Section 3 Initial Study/Environmental Checklist
3.3 Environmental Checklist | Noise
City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 3-88 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022 commercial and industrial sources, miscellaneous stationary sources (e.g., heating and cooling systems, mechanical rooms, etc.), and construction sources (Covina, 2000). Potentially sensitive land uses in the City include residences (including residences for the elderly), schools, churches, and libraries. Commercial uses are not defined as noise sensitive receptors. Chapter 9.40, Noise, of the City’s Municipal Code, includes the following noise standards and regulations:
Section 9.40.050, Time Duration Correction Factors, prohibits any person from operating machinery or mechanical devices in a manner which creates a noise increase of more than 5 dBA for a cumulative period of more than 15 minutes in any hour; 10 dBA for a cumulative period of more than 5 minutes in any hour; 15 dBA for a cumulative period of more than 1minute in any hour; or 20 dBA for any period above the ambient noise level at any property outside the hours permitted by the City’s noise ordinance for construction activity.
Section 9.40.110, Construction, prohibits construction activity between the hours of 8:00 PM and 7:00 AM any day, and at any time on Sundays and public holidays.
Section 10.44.010, Designation, establishes truck routes for vehicles exceeding a maximum gross weight of three tons.
Would the Project result in:
a) Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the Project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated.
Construction
Implementation of the Project and the associated future development and redevelopment would result in construction activity that could adversely affect existing land uses adjacent to the Project Sites. As discussed above, the City’s Municipal Code, Chapter 9.40, Section 9.40.110 Construction, contains noise regulations and standards that limit unnecessary, excessive, and annoying noise in the City including noise generated by construction, machinery, motor vehicles, and animals (Covina, 2022).
It is unlawful for any person within any residential land use category or within a radius of 500 feet therefrom to operate equipment or perform any outside construction or repair work on any building, structure, or project; or to operate any pile driver, steam shovel, pneumatic hammer, electric saw, grinder, steam or electric hoist, or other construction-type equipment or device between the hours of 8:00 p.m. of any one day and 7:00 a.m. of the next day, at any time on any Sunday or at any time on any public holiday in such a manner that a reasonable person of normal sensitivity residing in the area is caused discomfort or annoyance, unless beforehand a permit therefor has been duly obtained in accordance with the provisions of subsection (B) of this section. No permit shall be required to perform emergency work.
Section 3 Initial Study/Environmental Checklist
3.3 Environmental Checklist | Noise
City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 3-89 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022 The noise regulations and standards are designed to allow construction activities and the use of construction equipment during daytime hours when people are normally awake and less sensitive to potentially offending noise sources and prohibit such activities and equipment during late evening and nighttime hours or during Sundays or holidays when people are normally asleep or resting and more sensitive to potentially offending noise sources. Compliance with the City’s Municipal Code noise regulations and standards is required and enforceable through the City building official and would be protective of potentially offending noise from construction activities associated with buildout of the future development and redevelopment associated with the Project.
The MUOD applies on an as-requested, project-by-project basis, to General Commercial (GC) and General Industrial (GI) general plan designations. As such, the construction schedule and activities associated with the future development and redevelopment of the Project has not been determined until specific projects have been proposed and submitted to the City. With implementation of Mitigation Measures NOI-1 and NOI-2, the Project would comply with construction hours per the City’s Municipal Code and would incorporate construction BMPs.
Implementation of the Project and the associated future development and redevelopment would not result in the generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the Project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies. As such, impacts would be less than significant in this regard.
Operation
This section describes the activities relating to operation of the future development and redevelopment associated with the Project; including project-related vehicular traffic and any onsite noise-generating equipment and activity.
Traffic Noise Impacts on Off-Site Land Uses
To characterize the Project Area’s future day/night noise environment, the noise levels attributed to future traffic volumes on local roadways were evaluated (Appendix C, of this Draft IS/MND).
The City adopted Resolution CC 2020-56 (Covina, 2020) regarding the VMT thresholds of significance for the purposes of analyzing transportation impacts under CEQA. These thresholds are consistent with the recommended screening criteria contained in the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA (ORP, 2018). Consistent with the OPR Technical Advisory, the City recommends that a project generating 110 average daily trips (ADT) or less be screened out of a VMT analysis due to the presumption of a less than significant impact.
According to the Project’s Transportation Assessment Report (Appendix D, of this Draft IS/MND), over a 24-hour period, the buildout of the potential for 1,360 additional dwelling units would generate 6,174 daily trip ends during a typical weekday (3,087 inbound trips and 3,087 outbound trips). The above trip generation forecast is considered very conservative, in that no specific vehicle trip generation credits have been applied to the forecast to account for existing and occupied land uses that may be demolished as part of any future development and
Section 3 Initial Study/Environmental Checklist
3.3 Environmental Checklist | Noise
City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 3-90 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022 redevelopment associated with the Project.
14 These estimated daily trips would occur as a result
of buildout of the potential residential dwelling units throughout the various Project Areas. Thus, the trips that would result from future development and redevelopment associated with the Project would not occur on any one roadway segment in the City, but would be distributed throughout various roadway segments in the City. As a result, implementation of the Project would not result in substantially more vehicle trips to the existing conditions on any one roadway segment and would result in minimal changes in the traffic noise levels compared to the corresponding baseline traffic noise level along roadway segments in the Project Areas. A doubling of traffic volumes along a roadway segment is required to increase traffic noise by 3 dBA and such an increase is not anticipated to occur with implementation of the Project given the anticipated number of vehicle trips and the distribution of those trips throughout various roadway segments in the City. Therefore, no significant traffic noise impact under the existing plus project scenario would occur from the implementation of the Project.
Noise Impacts on Land Uses Proposed within the Mixed-Use Overlay District Chapter IV of the City’s General Plan Noise Element states that “the goal is: An environment in which potential adverse impacts of noise on the City’s residents and workers are identified and prevented and mitigated” (Covina, 2000). Among the Policy Areas, Policy Area 1 (Transportation Noise Sources) has the following relevant policies:
The City shall:
1. Examine the noise environment of proposed residential or other noisesensitive uses located within all 60 Ldn noise contours to ensure compatibility and, pertaining to residential activities, adherence to applicable State noise insulation standards.
2. Attempt to mitigate or eliminate the possible noise problems of proposed residential or other noise-sensitive uses located within all 65 Ldn noise contours to ensure compatibility and, pertaining to residential activities, adherence to applicable State noise insulation standards.
3. Consider “noise-sensitive uses” to include, but not be limited to, all residential housing types, public and private primary and secondary schools, libraries, parks/recreation areas, hospitals/medical facilities, nursing homes, and churches.
4. Consider establishing acceptable limits of noise levels for various land uses throughout the community, in accordance with State guidelines, as a means of determining noise-compatible land uses.
5. Ensure the inclusion of noise-mitigation measures and features in the design, orientation, and routing of new and improved streets and circulation and transportation facilities, where necessary and consistent with funding capability.
14 Linscott Law & Greenspan, Transportation Assessment Report, Covina Mixed-Use Overlay District, March 2022 (Appendix D, of this Draft IS/MND).
Section 3 Initial Study/Environmental Checklist
3.3 Environmental Checklist | Noise
City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 3-91 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022
6. Require noise-reduction techniques and features in site planning, architectural design, project landscaping, building materials, and/or construction, where necessary or required by law.
14. Require that new or expanded developments minimize the noise impacts of trips that they generate on residential neighborhoods by controlling the location of driveways and parking.
California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 24 establishes the CBC. The most recent building standard adopted by the legislature and used throughout the state is the 2016 version, which took effect on January 1, 2017 (CCR, 2017). The State of California’s noise insulation standards are codified in the CBC (Title 24, Part 2, Chapter 12) (CBC, 2017). These noise standards are for new construction in California for the purposes of interior compatibility with exterior noise sources. The regulations specify that acoustical studies must be prepared when noise-sensitive structures, such as residences, schools, or hospitals, are near major transportation noises, and where such noise sources create an exterior noise level of 60 dBA Community Noise Level Equivalent (CNEL), or higher. Acoustical studies that accompany building plans must demonstrate that the structure has been designed to limit interior noise in habitable rooms to acceptable noise levels. For new residential buildings, schools, and hospitals, the acceptable interior noise limit for new construction is 45 dBA CNEL.
Based on the U.S. EPA Levels Document, standard buildings in warm climate areas would provide a 24 dBA exterior-to-interior noise attenuation with windows and doors closed, and 12 dBA noise attenuation with windows open. In order to meet the 45 dBA CNEL interior noise standard for residential uses, residences proposed within the impact zone of 57 dBA CNEL should be equipped with mechanical ventilation (e.g., air conditioning) to ensure that windows can remain closed for prolonged periods of time. For residences proposed within the impacts zone of 69 dBA CNEL, building façade upgrades (e.g., windows upgrades with sound transmission class ratings higher than the STC-28 standard building design would provide) would be required.
New residential units within the Project Sites would be potentially exposed to traffic noise levels in the Conditionally Acceptable or Normally Unacceptable zones, with traffic noise levels ranging from 60 to 75 dBA CNEL. All proposed new multifamily residential uses in the Project Sites will be required to prepare a detailed noise impact analysis as a part of their environmental review process.
With the implementation of the Mitigation Measures NOI-3 and NOI-4, the Project would comply with the requirements of the City’s General Plan Noise Element and City’s Municipal Code noise ordinance. Implementation of the future development and redevelopment of the Project would not result in the generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the Project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies. As such, impacts would be less than significant.
Mitigation Measures
NOI-1: Construction Hours. Construction activities occurring as part of the future development and redevelopment associated with the Project shall be subject to the limitations which states that construction activities may occur between 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. Mondays through Saturdays. No construction activities shall be permitted outside of these hours or on Sundays and federal holidays unless a temporary waiver is granted by the City.
Section 3 Initial Study/Environmental Checklist
3.3 Environmental Checklist | Noise
City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 3-92 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022 NOI-2: Construction Best Management Practices. Prior to issuance of grading permits for future development and redevelopment associated with the Project, the Project Applicants shall incorporate the following measures as a note on the grading plan cover sheet to ensure that the greatest distance between noise sources and sensitive receptors during construction activities have been achieved. • Construction equipment, fixed or mobile, shall be equipped with properly operating and maintained noise mufflers consistent with manufacturers’ standards.
• Construction staging areas shall be located away from off-site sensitive uses during project construction.
• The Project Contractors shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the Project Sites, whenever feasible.
NOI-3: Building Design Noise Control Measures. Design standards for proposed new multifamily residential uses within the Project Sites may include but are not limited to:
• Dwelling units that would be exposed to traffic noise levels exceeding 57 dBA CNEL: A form of fresh air supply, such as air conditioning systems, will be required.
• Dwelling units that would be exposed to traffic noise levels exceeding 65 dBA CNEL: Outdoor living areas such as balcony or deck on the side of the buildings exposed to high traffic noise should not be allowed unless noise mitigation measures, such as barrier walls with a minimum height of 5 feet with adequate materials (CMU, wood, Plexiglas) with no holes or gaps, along the perimeter of the outdoor living areas are included.
• Dwelling units that would be exposed to traffic noise levels exceeding 69 dBA CNEL: Windows associated with bedrooms and living/family rooms on the side of the buildings exposed to high traffic noise will be required to have building façade upgrades, such as using windows with Sound Transmission Class (STC) ratings higher than standard building practice (up to STC-28).
NOI-4: Stationary Sources Noise Control Measures. Due to the nature of mixed use overlay, some residences may be exposed to noise sources from the operations of the commercial uses nearby or down below. Such noise sources include loading/unloading activity and outdoor mechanical equipment and the following design standards are recommended.
• Loading areas associated with commercial uses within the Project Sites should be placed away from outdoor living areas associated with residential uses. Noise barriers with sufficient height to block the line-of-sight between the loading areas and outdoor living areas in proximity of the loading areas will be required. • Stationary outdoor mechanical equipment should be placed away from residential outdoor living areas or be enclosed with a structure to minimize the potential noise impacts.
• All noise sources shall follow the City’s Municipal Code noise control ordinance requirements.
Section 3 Initial Study/Environmental Checklist
3.3 Environmental Checklist | Noise
City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 3-93 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022 b) Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated.
Construction
As shown in Table XIII-1, Construction Vibration Damage Criteria, Federal Transportation Administration (FTA) guidelines show that a vibration level of up to 0.5 inch/sec peak particle velocity (PPV) (FTA, 2018) is considered safe for buildings consisting of reinforced concrete, steel, or timber (no plaster), and would not result in any construction vibration damage. For a non-engineered timber and masonry building, the construction vibration damage criterion is
0.2 inch/sec PPV. The PPV values for human annoyance thresholds shown in Table XIII-2, Caltrans Vibration Annoyance Potential Criteria, which is taken from the Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual (Caltrans, 2020). Table XII-3, Guidelines Vibration Damage Potential Threshold Criteria, taken from the Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual (Caltrans, 2020), shows additional vibration damage thresholds for various buildings.
TABLE XIII-1
CONSTRUCTION VIBRATION DAMAGE CRITERIA
Building Category PPV (inch/sec) Approximate LV
a
Reinforced-concrete, steel or timber (no plaster) 0.50 102 Engineered concrete and masonry (no plaster) 0.30 98
Non-engineered timber and masonry buildings 0.20 94
Buildings extremely susceptible to vibration damage 0.12 90 NOTES:
PPV = peak particle velocity; LV = velocity in decibels; inch/sec = inches per second a Root-mean-square velocity in decibels (VdB) re 1 microinch per second.
SOURCE: Federal Transit Administration. Table 12-3, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment (2008).
TABLE XIII-2
CALTRANS VIBRATION ANNOYANCE POTENTIAL CRITERIA
Structure and Condition
Maximum PPV (in/sec)
Transient Sources
Continuous/
Frequent Intermittent Sources
Barely perceptible 0.04 0.01
Distinctly perceptible 0.25 0.04
Strongly perceptible 0.9 0.1
Severe 2.0 0.4
NOTE: Transient sources create a single isolated vibration event, such as blasting or drop balls. Continuous/frequent intermittent sources include impact pile drivers, pogo-stick compactors, crack and-seat equipment, vibratory pile drivers, and vibratory compaction equipment.
SOURCE: Caltrans, Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual. September 2020.
Section 3 Initial Study/Environmental Checklist
3.3 Environmental Checklist | Noise
City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 3-94 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022 TABLE XIII-3
GUIDELINE VIBRATION DAMAGE POTENTIAL THRESHOLD CRITERIA Structure and Condition
Maximum PPV (inch/sec)
Transient
Sourcesa
Continuous/Frequent
Intermittent Sourcesb
Extremely fragile historic buildings, ruins, ancient monuments 0.12 0.08 Fragile buildings 0.20 0.10
Historic and some old buildings 0.50 0.25
Older residential structures 0.50 0.30
New residential structures 1.00 0.50
Modern industrial/commercial buildings 2.00 0.50
NOTES:
PPV = peak particle velocity; inch/sec = inches per second a Transient sources create a single, isolated vibration event, such as blasting or drop balls. b Continuous/frequent intermittent sources include impact pile drivers, pogo-stick compactors, crack-and-seat equipment, vibratory pile drivers, and vibratory compaction equipment.
SOURCE: California Department of Transportation, Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual (Caltrans, 2020), Table 19.
Construction of the future development and redevelopment associated with the Project would be required to avoid causing structural damage to any buildings adjacent to the construction sites.
Due to the proximity of potential sites within the Project Areas, there is the potential for structural damage impacts during construction activity. With implementation of Mitigation NOI-5, the Project would incorporate the construction vibration measures below as a note on the grading plan to ensure the greatest distance between vibration sources and sensitive receptors/buildings during construction have been achieved. As such, impacts would be less than significant in this regard.
NOI-5: Construction Vibration Management Plan. Prior to issuance of grading permits for future development and redevelopment associated with the Project, the Project Applicants shall incorporate the following measures as a note on the grading plan cover sheet to ensure that the greatest distance between vibration sources and sensitive receptors/buildings during construction activities have been achieved. • Construction on any individual Project Site that would result in vibration levels exceeding 0.5 in/sec PPV at adjacent buildings shall submit a Construction Vibration Management Plan to the City for approval and ensure that no building damages would occur as a result of construction of the Project. • Construction on any individual Project Site that would result in vibration levels exceeding 0.04 in/sec PPV or 80 VdB shall submit a Construction Vibration Management Plan to the City for approval and ensure that human annoyance by Project construction vibration is reduced to the level considered less than distinctly perceptible by adjacent building occupants.
Operation
Operation of future development and redevelopment associated with the Project would include typical residential and commercial- or light industrial-grade stationary mechanical and electrical
Section 3 Initial Study/Environmental Checklist
3.3 Environmental Checklist | Noise
City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 3-95 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022 equipment, such as air handling units, condenser units, and exhaust fans, which could produce vibration. In addition, the primary sources of transient vibration would include vehicle circulation within designated parking areas. Groundborne vibration generated by each of the abovementioned activities would generate approximately up to 0.005 in/sec PPV in the vicinity of these vibration sources,15 which would not be substantial to cause building damage or human annoyance. As such, implementation of the Project would not generate substantial ground vibration and impacts would be less than significant. No mitigation is required during operations. c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the Project expose people residing or working in the Project area to excessive noise levels?
No Impact. Future development and redevelopment associated with the Project would not result in impacts relevant to airport land use plans, airports, or private airstrips as the Project is not located within the vicinity of a private airstrip, airport land use plan, or public or public use airport. The nearest airport to the Project Sites is Brackett Field Airport which is not located within two miles of the Project Sites. No impacts would occur in this regard.
References
CBC, 2017. California Building Code, Title 24, Part 2, Chapter 12, January 1, 2017.
CCR, 2017. California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 15168(c), January 1, 2017.
Caltrans, 2013. California Department of Transportation, Technical Noise Supplement (TeNS), September 2013.
Caltrans, 2020. California Department of Transportation, Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual, 2020.
OPR, 2018. California Office of Planning and Research, Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA, April 2018.
Covina, 2000. City of Covina’s General Plan, Noise Element, adopted April 18, 2000.
Covina, 2022. City of Covina Municipal Code, passed January 18, 2022, https://www.codepublishing.com/CA/Covina/, accessed April 2022.
Covina, 2020. City of Covina, Resolution CC 2020-56, to adopt Vehicle Miles Traveled Thresholds of Significance for the Purposes of Analyzing Transportation Impacts under the California Environmental Quality Act, June 2020.
FHA, 2006. Federal Highway Administration, Roadway Construction Noise Model User’s Guide, 2006.
FTA, 2018. Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual, September 2018.
15 This vibration estimate is based on data presented in the USDOT FTA, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual, 2018.
Section 3 Initial Study/Environmental Checklist
3.3 Environmental Checklist | Noise
City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 3-96 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022 USEPA, 1974. EPA Identifies Noise Levels Affecting Health and Welfare, April 1974.
USEPA, 1978. Protective Noise Levels, Condensed Version of EPA Levels Document (EPA 550/9-79-100, November 1978).
Section 3 Initial Study/Environmental Checklist
3.3 Environmental Checklist | Population and Housing
City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 3-97 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022 Population and Housing
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources):
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-thanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
XIV. POPULATION AND HOUSING—Would the Project:
a) Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing
elsewhere?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
Discussion
Would the Project:
a) Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
Less than Significant Impact. No development projects are currently proposed as part of the MUOD amendment; therefore, no direct impacts to population growth would be caused by the amendment. However, the proposed MUOD amendment would be expected to induce population growth in the City by allowing multi-family housing or mixed-use development within an area where new housing is not currently allowed. The proposed MUOD amendment is required by State law in order to create additional opportunities for housing development consistent with the RHNA and the RTP/SCS. If the City fails to adopt the MUOD, or other similar amendment to facilitate additional housing development commensurate with the RHNA, the City would be subject to sanctions and enforcement actions by HCD and the Attorney General including potential fines, litigation, and court-imposed zoning changes and development project approvals, as well as litigation from other interested parties. As such, impacts would be less than significant in this regard.
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
Less Than Significant Impact. The Project and the associated future development and redevelopment are located in 141 parcels within 13 Project Areas located throughout the City.
The existing site conditions of the 13 Project Areas consist of developed lots generally comprising of commercial uses, asphalt surface parking lots, and ornamental landscaping and trees. While residential uses are not permitted within the areas where the MUOD would be applied and there are no known dwelling units currently located on the Project Sites, a comprehensive survey of every parcel within the proposed MUOD area has not been conducted to confirm existing uses. Therefore, it is possible that one or more non-conforming residential uses may be present. California Government Code Sec. 66300 requires that any housing units
Section 3 Initial Study/Environmental Checklist
3.3 Environmental Checklist | Population and Housing
City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 3-98 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022 demolished as part of a housing development project must be replaced. The proposed MUOD regulations include a provision requiring conformance with this State requirement, which would avoid or substantially mitigate potential displacement of people or housing. Required compliance with existing State law would substantially reduce this impact to a level that is less than significant.
References
SCAG, 2020. Southern California Association of Governments. 2020–2045 RTP/SCS, Demographics & Growth Forecast. May 7, 2020.
SCAG, 2021. 6th cycle Final RHNA Allocation Plan. March 4, 2021. https://scag.ca.gov/rhna, accessed May 2022.
U.S. Census, 2021. United States Census Bureau, QuickFacts, Covina City, California.
Population Estimates, July 1, 2021. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/covinacitycalifornia, accessed April 2022.
Section 3 Initial Study/Environmental Checklist
3.3 Environmental Checklist | Public Services
City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 3-99 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022 Public Services
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources):
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-thanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
XV. PUBLIC SERVICES—Would the Project:
a) Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable
service ratios, response times or other performance
objectives for any of the following public services:
i) Fire protection? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
ii) Police protection? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
iii) Schools? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
iv) Parks? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
v) Other public facilities? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
Discussion
Would the Project:
a) Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the following public services:
i) Fire Protection?
Less than Significant Impact. Fire protection and emergency medical services for the City, including the Project Sites, are provided by the Los Angeles County Fire Department (LACFD), who is contracted with the City. The LACFD provides 24-hour, all-risk emergency services to a population of approximately 4.1 million residents living and working in 60 cities and all of the County’s unincorporated communities in a service area of approximately 2,311 square miles. The LACFD is comprised of the Emergency Operations Bureau, the Business Operations Bureau, and the Leadership and Professional Standards Bureau. The emergency operations field divisions are comprised of the North Region, the Central Region, and the East Region within the LACFD service area, which are divided into nine divisions and 22 battalions (LACFD, 2021). The LACFD provides emergency services in response to a wide range of incidents including structure fires, wildfires, commercial fires, hazardous materials incidents, urban search and rescue, and swift water rescue. In 2020, the LACFD responded to a total of 379,517 incidents which included 307,025 emergency medical responses, 9,813 fire incidents (i.e., structures, vehicles, rubbish, brush/grass, outside storage, and miscellaneous property), and 62,679 other incidents (i.e., false alarms, mutual aid provided, hazardous materials, and miscellaneous incidents). In 2020, the LACFD lifeguard division responded to 26,103 incidents which included medical calls, ocean
Section 3 Initial Study/Environmental Checklist
3.3 Environmental Checklist | Public Services
City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 3-100 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022 rescues, missing persons, boat rescues/distress, oxygen therapy, and drownings. The LACFD consists of approximately 4,775 personnel including chief officers, captains, firefighter specialists, firefighter paramedics, firefighters, call firefighters, fire suppression aides, pilots, administrative support, lifeguards, dispatchers, foresters, and hazardous materials specialists. The LACFD is comprised of 177 fire stations with 228 engine companies (i.e., type I, type III, and type VI), 34 truck companies (i.e., quints and light forces), 112 paramedic units (i.e., squads, assessment engines, air squads, and assessment quint/light force), and reserve equipment. The lifeguard division includes 24 lifeguard stations, 159 lifeguard towers, 58 beach patrol vehicles, 8 rescue boats, 2 paramedic rescue boats, and 2 baywatch paramedic squads. The air and wildland division includes 10 helicopters, 9 fire suppression camps, 18 fire suppression crews, and 19 pieces of heavy equipment (i.e., excavators, heavy dump trucks, track loaders, and rubber tire loaders) (LACFD, 2020).
The City, including the Project Sites, are located within Division II of the East Region’s emergency operations field division. Division II includes Battalions No. 2 and 16 and serves the cities of Azusa, Baldwin Park, Bradbury, Claremont, Covina, Duarte, Glendora, Irwindale, and San Dimas. Three LACFD fire stations provide fire protection and emergency medical services for the City, including the Project Sites: Fire Station No. 152, located at 807 Cypress Street, Covina; Fire Station No. 153, located at 1577 East Cypress Street, Covina; and Fire Station No. 154, located at 401 North Second Avenue, Covina (LACFD, 2020). The LACFD operates under a regional concept in its approach to providing fire protection and emergency medical services, wherein emergency response units are dispatched as needed to an incident anywhere in the LACFD’s service territory based on distance and availability, without regard to jurisdictional or municipal boundaries.
Construction
Construction activities for future development and redevelopment associated with the Project may temporarily increase the demand for fire protection and emergency medical services, and may cause the occasional exposure of combustible materials, such as wood, plastics, sawdust, coverings and coatings, to heat sources including machinery and equipment sparking, exposed electrical lines, welding activities, and chemical reactions in combustible materials and coatings.
However, in compliance with the requirements of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), all construction managers and personnel would be trained in fire prevention and emergency response. Further, fire suppression equipment specific to construction would be maintained on the Project Sites. As applicable, construction activities of future development and redevelopment associated with the Project would be required to comply with the 2019 CBC and the 2019 CFC, of which the City has adopted as the City’s Fire Code.
Construction activities for future development and redevelopment may involve temporary lane closures for curbside improvements (e.g., sidewalks, driveways, underground facilities and infrastructure). Construction-related traffic could result in increased travel time due to flagging or stopping of traffic to accommodate trucks entering and exiting the Project Sites during construction. As such, construction activities could increase response times for emergency vehicles to local business and/or residences within the Project Areas, due to travel time delays to through traffic. However, the impacts of such construction activity would be temporary and on an
Section 3 Initial Study/Environmental Checklist
3.3 Environmental Checklist | Public Services
City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 3-101 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022 intermittent basis. Further, a Construction Management Plan for future development and redevelopment associated with the Project would be prepared in order to minimize disruptions to through traffic flow, maintain emergency vehicle access to the Project Sites and neighboring land uses, and schedule worker and construction equipment delivery to avoid peak traffic hours. As a component of the Construction Management Plan, the times of day and locations of all temporary lane closures would be coordinated so that they do not occur during peak periods of traffic congestion, to the extent feasible. Truck routes for material and equipment deliveries, as well as for soil export and disposal, would require approval by the City’s Public Works Department prior to construction activities. The Construction Management Plan would be prepared for review and approval prior to commencement of any construction activity. These practices, as well as techniques typically employed by emergency vehicles to clear or circumvent traffic (i.e., lights and sirens), are expected to limit the potential for significant delays in emergency response times during construction of future development and redevelopment. Therefore, impacts regarding emergency response times and emergency access during construction of future development and redevelopment associated with the Project would be less than significant. No mitigation is required.
Operation
The Project consists of adding a new chapter of mixed-use overlay regulations to the City’s Zoning Ordinance and amending the City’s Official Zoning Map through the addition of a MUOD to various sites located in 141 parcels within 13 Project Areas. Future development and redevelopment associated with the Project would result in the potential for 1,360 additional dwelling units and commercial and general light industrial land uses. As discussed in Section XIV, Population and Housing, implementation of the Project would increase the residential population, temporary and permanent employment, and visitors in the City, which would increase the demand for fire protection and emergency medical services. As discussed above, three LACFD fire stations provide fire protection and emergency medical services for the City, including the Project Sites (LACFD, 2020). The LACFD operates under a regional concept in its approach to providing fire protection and emergency medical services, wherein emergency response units are dispatched as needed to an incident anywhere in the LACFD’s service territory based on distance and availability, without regard to jurisdictional or municipal boundaries. Due to the close proximity of multiple fire stations to the Project Sites, service calls are anticipated to be responded to within LACFD’s desired response times.
Future development and redevelopment associated with the Project would be subject to compliance with fire protection design standards, as necessary, per the 2019 CBC, 2019 CFC, and LACFD, to ensure adequate fire protection and emergency medical services. The LACFD’s standard conditions of approval generally require that plans for building construction, fire flow requirements, fire protection devices (i.e., fire sprinklers and alarms), fire hydrants and spacing, fire access including ingress/egress, turning radii, driveway width, and grading would be prepared for review and approval by the City and LACFD. It is anticipated that future development and redevelopment associated with the Project would be considered infill and/or redevelopment and would likely replace an existing building of similar type and intensity, thereby not substantially altering the current land use intensity or land use patters within the City. Further, improvement plans of future development and redevelopment would be subject to review and approval by the
Section 3 Initial Study/Environmental Checklist
3.3 Environmental Checklist | Public Services
City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 3-102 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022 City and LACFD at the time such development is proposed. As such, impacts regarding fire protection and medical services would be less than significant. No mitigation is required. ii) Police Protection?
Less than Significant Impact. Police protection services for the City, including the Project Sites, are provided by the Covina Police Department (CPD). The CPD is comprised of the Operations Division and the Police Support Services Division. The Operations Division is comprised of those divisions which provide the basic police function and is made up of patrol, service area policing, traffic unit, school resource officers, Covina Jail, helicopter support, special response team, and parking enforcement. The Administration Services Division supports the CPD and is comprised of investigations, police records, police communications, police administration, crime prevention, and animal control (CPD, 2022). The CPD police station is located at 444 North Citrus Avenue.
Construction
During construction activities for future development and redevelopment associated with the Project, equipment and building materials could be temporarily stored on-site, which could result in theft, graffiti, and vandalism. However, the Project Sites are located in areas with high vehicular activity from adjacent roadways. In addition, future construction sites would be fenced along the perimeter, with the height and fence materials subject to review and approval by the City’s Public Works Department. As discussed above, temporary lane closures may be required for curbside improvements (e.g., sidewalks, driveways, underground facilities and infrastructure).
However, these closures would be temporary in nature and in the event of partial lane closures, both directions of travel on area roadways and access to the Project Sites would be maintained.
Further, as discussed above, a Construction Management Plan for future development and redevelopment associated with the Project would be prepared in order to minimize disruptions to through traffic flow, maintain emergency vehicle access to the Project Sites and neighboring land uses, and schedule worker and construction equipment delivery to avoid peak traffic hours.
Emergency vehicle drivers have a variety of options for avoiding traffic, such as using their sirens to clear a path of travel or driving in the lanes of opposing traffic. Given the visibility of the Project Sites from adjacent roadways and surrounding properties, existing CPD presence in the City, maintained emergency access, and construction fencing, the Project is not expected to increase demand on existing police services to a meaningful extent. As such, future development and redevelopment associated with the Project would have a less than significant temporary impact on police protection during the construction phases. No mitigation is required.
Operation
The Project consists of adding a new chapter of mixed-use overlay regulations to the City’s Zoning Ordinance and amending the City’s Official Zoning Map through the addition of a MUOD to various sites located in 141 parcels within 13 Project Areas. Future development and redevelopment associated with the Project would result in the potential for 1,360 additional dwelling units and commercial and general light industrial land uses. As discussed in Section XIV, Population and Housing, implementation of the Project would increase the residential population, temporary and permanent employment, and visitors in the City, which would increase
Section 3 Initial Study/Environmental Checklist
3.3 Environmental Checklist | Public Services
City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 3-103 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022 the demand for police protection. With future development and redevelopment on the Project Sites, patrol routes in the Project Areas would be slightly modified to include the Project Sites, as necessary. It is expected that future development and redevelopment would incorporate typical defensible design techniques, such as lighting of entry-ways and public areas, landscaping, and open fencing designed to minimize dead spaces hidden from public view. Defensible design techniques would help prevent loitering and crime, thereby lessening the demand for police protection services associated with future development and redevelopment. To ensure that police protection considerations are incorporated into the Project design, prior to issuance of building permits for future development and redevelopment, the CPD would be provided the opportunity to review and comment upon improvement plans in order to facilitate opportunities for improved emergency access and response; ensure the consideration of design strategies that facilitate public safety and police surveillance; and other specific design recommendations to enhance public safety and reduce potential demands upon police protection services. It is anticipated that future development and redevelopment associated with the Project would be considered infill and/or redevelopment and would likely replace an existing building of similar type and intensity, thereby not substantially altering the current land use intensity or land use patters within the City. Further, improvement plans of future development and redevelopment would be subject to review and approval by the City and CPD at the time such development is proposed. As such, impacts regarding police protection services would be less than significant. No mitigation is required. iii) Schools?
Less than Significant Impact. The City and Project Sites are served by the Covina Valley Unified School District (CVUSD). There are 5 schools within the City limits that are within close proximity (i.e., 0.25 mile) of one of the Project Sites. The name of the school, the address, and the distance from the Project Sites are listed below.
• Covina Elementary School – 160 Barranca Avenue, immediately adjacent to the south of Area I;
• Barranca Elementary School – 727 S. Barranca Avenue, approximately 0.10 miles south of Area G;
• Northview High School – 1016 Cypress Street, approximately 0.18 miles northwest of Area K;
• Cypress Elementary School – 351 Cypress Street, approximately 0.20 miles west of Area D; and
• Fairvalley High School – 758 W. Grondahl Street, approximately 0.25 miles southeast of Area C.
The need for new school facilities is typically associated with a population increase that generates an increase in enrollment large enough to cause new schools to be constructed. As discussed in Section XIV, Population and Housing, the potential for 1,360 additional dwelling units associated with the Project could potentially result in approximately 4,216 additional residents in the City, assuming that all residents of the Project would relocate to the City. Employment increases have the potential to generate indirect population growth, as they may draw additional persons and their households to the City. The MUOD applies on an as-requested, project-byPage 170 of 858 Section 3 Initial Study/Environmental Checklist
3.3 Environmental Checklist | Public Services
City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 3-104 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022 project basis. As such, the estimated indirect residential population generated from future commercial and industrial development and redevelopment has not been determined as specific commercial and industrial projects have not been proposed and submitted to the City. Using the State of California Student Yield Factor for Unified School Districts, which is 0.7 students per dwelling unit, future development and redevelopment associated with the Project would generate approximately 95216 new students within the CVUSD (California, 2008). The Project and associated future development and redevelopment are located in 141 parcels within 13 Project Areas located throughout the City. As such, the Project Sites would be served by different school facilities, which would lessen the number of students that each school would support. Pursuant to Education Code Section 17620 and California Government Code Section 65995, development impact fees may be levied for residential, commercial, and industrial construction. Further, as stated in California Government Code Section 65996, payment of school impact fees in accordance with California Government Code Section 65995 and/or Education Code Section 17620 is deemed to constitute full and complete mitigation for potential impacts to schools caused by development. As such, impacts regarding schools would be less than significant. No mitigation is required.
iv) Parks?
Less than Significant Impact. The residents, temporary and permanent employees, and visitors generated from future development and redevelopment of the Project could use nearby park facilities. The City’s park system consists of nine parks and two ball fields. The City owns seven of nine parks, two parks are leased from the CVUSD, and recreational activities in the ball fields are conducted under leases with the Charter Oak Unified School District (COUSD). The parks in the City vary in size and facilities from the Three Oak Park, a 0.2-acre passive area oriented for employees of an adjacent office park in the southeastern portion of the City, to Wingate Park, a 16-acre park which contains ball fields, basketball courts, tennis courts, a roller rink, trails and picnic areas in the eastern portion of the City. Covina Park, a 10-acre multi-amenity facility located west of the City’s downtown, is the City’s oldest and most heavily used park.
Additionally, the 11-acre Walnut Creek Regional Park, which is owned and operated by the County, lies within the City limits. At the time of adoption of the City’s General Plan, the City had 1.3 acres of open space for every 1,000 residents. This ratio is considered significantly below the National Park and Recreation Association’s guideline of 2.5-4.0 acres of parkland for every 1,000 residents (Covina, 2000). While the City is currently deficient in parkland acreage, implementation of the Project would not substantially exacerbate this issue. The Project and associated future development and redevelopment are located in 141 parcels within 13 Project Areas located throughout the City. As such, the Project Sites would be served by different parks, which would lessen the number of residents, temporary and permanent employees, and visitors that each park facility would support. Further, Project Applicants of future development and redevelopment associated with the Project would be required to pay development fees that would help support park facilities. Payment of fees would help address any incremental increase in
16 1,360 dwelling units x 0.7 students per dwelling unit = 952 new students.
Section 3 Initial Study/Environmental Checklist
3.3 Environmental Checklist | Public Services
City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 3-105 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022 demand for parks facilities that may be caused by future development and redevelopment. As such, impacts regarding parks would be less than significant. No mitigation is required. v) Other public facilities?
Less than Significant Impact. Library services within the City are provided by the Covina Public Library (CPL), located at 234 North Second Avenue. The residents, temporary and permanent employees, and visitors generated from the future development and redevelopment of the Project could use the City’s library facilities and services, but the increase in use would not be significant relevant to the Citywide demand. Further, Project Applicants of future development and redevelopment associated with the Project would be required to pay development fees that would help support library facilities and services. As such, impacts regarding libraries would be less than significant.
The residents, temporary and permanent employees, and visitors generated from the future development and redevelopment associated with the Project would utilize and, to some extent, impact the maintenance of public facilities, including roads. However, it is not anticipated that development of the Project would significantly increase the use of government services beyond current levels. Construction activities would result in temporary increased use of the surrounding roads. However, the use of such facilities would not require maintenance beyond normal requirements. The Project Applicants of future development and redevelopment associated with the Project would be required to pay all applicable impact fees of the City. Overall, less than significant impacts to governmental services, including roads, would occur. No mitigation is required.
References
Covina, 2000. City of Covina’s General Plan, Natural Resources and Open Space Element, adopted April 18, 2000.
CPD, 2022. City of Covina Police Department Website. Police Operations Division Website, https://covinapd.org/ and https://covinapd.org/services/, accessed April 2022.
LACFD, 2021. Los Angeles County Fire Department Overview Booklet, August 2021, https://fire.lacounty.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Department-Overview-Booklet_singlepages_9.09.21-A.pdf, accessed April 2022.
LACFD, 2020. Los Angeles County Fire Department 2020 Statistical Summary, https://fire.lacounty.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/2020-Statistical-Summary-FINALDRAFT.pdf, accessed April 2022.
State of California Enrollment Certification/Projection School Facility Program, revised June 2008, https://www.dgsapps.dgs.ca.gov/OPSC/ab1014/sab50-01instructions.pdf, accessed April 2018.
Section 3 Initial Study/Environmental Checklist
3.3 Environmental Checklist | Recreation
City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 3-106 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022 Recreation
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources):
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-thanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
XVI. RECREATION—
a) Would the Project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
b) Does the Project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
Discussion
Would the Project:
a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated?
Less than Significant Impact. The residents, temporary and permanent employees, and visitors generated from future development and redevelopment of the Project could use nearby park and recreational facilities. The City’s park system consists of nine parks and two ball fields. Additionally, the 11-acre Walnut Creek Regional Park, which is owned and operated by the County, lies within the City limits. The City has a limited trailrelated network that supplements the park system, include a few streets that are designated as bicycle ways and two equestrian/hiking trails that run through the City. As discussed under Section XV, Public Services, at the time of adoption of the City’s General Plan, the City had 1.3 acres of open space for every 1,000 residents. This ratio is considered significantly below the National Park and Recreation Association’s guideline of 2.5-4.0 acres of parkland for every 1,000 residents. As such, the City is currently deficient in parkland acreage (Covina, 2000). The Project and associated future development and redevelopment are located in 141 parcels within 13 Project Areas located throughout the City. As such, the Project Sites would be served by different parks and recreational facilities, which would lessen the number of residents, temporary and permanent employees, and visitors that each park and recreational facility would support.
Further, Project Applicants of future development and redevelopment associated with the Project would be required to pay development fees that would help support parks and recreational facilities. Payment of fees would help address any incremental increase in demand for parks and recreational facilities that may be caused by future development and redevelopment. As such, impacts regarding recreational facilities would be less than significant. No mitigation is required.
Section 3 Initial Study/Environmental Checklist
3.3 Environmental Checklist | Recreation
City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 3-107 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022 b) Does the Project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment?
No Impact. The Project consists of adding a new chapter of mixed-use overlay regulations to the City’s Zoning Ordinance and amending the City’s Official Zoning Map through the addition of a MUOD to various sites located in 141 parcels within 13 Project Areas. Future development and redevelopment associated with the Project would result in the potential for 1,360 additional dwelling units and commercial and general light industrial land uses. The future development and redevelopment does not include recreational facilities and does not require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities. As such, no impacts would occur in this regard.
References
Covina, 2000. City of Covina’s General Plan, Natural Resources and Open Space Element, adopted April 18, 2000.
Section 3 Initial Study/Environmental Checklist
3.3 Environmental Checklist | Transportation
City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 3-108 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022 Transportation
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources):
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-thanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
XVII. TRANSPORTATION—Would the Project:
a) Conflict with a program plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
b) Would the Project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b)?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
d) Result in inadequate emergency access? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
Discussion
The following analysis is based on the Transportation Assessment Report: Covina Mixed-Use Overlay District (Transportation Assessment) (LLG, 2022), located in Appendix D, of this Draft IS/MND. The Transportation Assessment was conducted following the City’s Transportation Study Guidelines (Guidelines) (Covina, 2020), which are focused on transportation metrics that promote: the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, the development of multimodal networks and access to diverse land uses, as well as safety, sustainability and smart growth. In compliance with CEQA, the Guidelines identify VMT as the primary metric for evaluating a project’s transportation impacts.
Would the Project:
a) Conflict with a program plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities? Less than Significant Impact. The Project Sites are located in the City within the San Gabriel Valley of the County of Los Angeles. Regional access to the Project Sites is provided via I-210 Freeway to the north, I-10 Freeway to the south, and South Azusa Avenue/California State SR-39 to the east of Project Areas L, K, and M and to the west for the remainder of the Project Areas.
Local access to/from the Project Areas is provided via various local, collector, and secondary and primary arterial roadways throughout the City.
If implemented, the Project would apply on an as-requested, project-by-project basis, to General Commercial (GC) and General Industrial (GI) General Plan designations. As such, the construction schedule and activities associated with the future development and redevelopment of the Project Sites is indeterminate at this time, until specific projects are proposed and the Project Applicants have submitted entitlement applications to the City for review. The City’s Municipal Code currently limits construction hours to no earlier than 7:00 A.M. and no later than 5:00 P.M., on Monday through Friday, except on Sundays and federal holidays. Construction on Saturdays would require pre-approval by the City Engineer (Covina, 2022).
Section 3 Initial Study/Environmental Checklist
3.3 Environmental Checklist | Transportation
City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 3-109 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022 During the construction period, construction vehicles would use the roadways that surround the Project Sites to deliver materials and haul waste. Workers’ vehicles and construction vehicles could access the Project Sites from any of the regional facilities described above, as well as various local, collector, and secondary and primary arterial roadways throughout the City.
Roadway users could experience temporary delays from material deliveries, but these delays would be both brief and infrequent. Therefore, they would not affect overall traffic circulation in the vicinity of the Project Sites. Construction staging would generally occur on-site and would not affect traffic operations on adjacent roadways. Construction activities would not impede nonmotorized travel or public transportation in the vicinity of the Project Sites. The Project could, however, require temporary sidewalk and/or lane closures along roadways adjacent to the Project Sites while curbside improvements are being made (e.g., sidewalks, driveways, underground facilities and infrastructure). However, through-access for vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians along all roadways will still be provided. In these instances, the construction contractors of future development and redevelopment associated with the Project would implement traffic control measures (e.g., construction flagmen, signage, etc.) consistent with required City encroachment permit(s) to maintain flow and access. Any delays would be temporary and would be considered to be less than significant.
The Project would not conflict with any applicable plans, ordinances, or policies establishing measures for effectiveness of the performance of the circulation system, such as the Covina General Plan Mobility Element (Covina, 2000) or the City of Covina Bicycle Master Plan (Covina, 2011). Consistent with the City’s requirements, trip generation for the Project was calculated using the Institute of Transportation Engineers’ (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (ITE, 2021). As detailed in the Transportation Assessment (Appendix D, of this Draft IS/MND), future development and redevelopment associated with the Project is expected to generate 504 vehicle trips during the weekday AM peak hour and 529 vehicle trips during the weekday PM peak hour.
The above trip generation forecast is considered to be very conservative, in that no specific vehicle trip generation credits were applied to the forecast to account for existing and occupied land uses that may be demolished as part of any future entitlement application. Considering that these vehicle trips would be spread across a vast geographic area representing all 13 Project Areas, future development and redevelopment associated with the Project is not expected to substantially degrade traffic operations or roadways in the Project vicinity, nor would it impede non-motorized travel or public transportation. As such, impacts would be less than significant.
Based on the above discussion, the Project would not conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities. As mentioned above, the Project would not impede travel in the vicinity of the Project Sites, and would not decrease the performance or safety of such facilities. As a result, impacts would be less than significant. No mitigation is required. b) Would the Project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b)?
Less than Significant Impact. Based on the City’s adoption of Resolution CC 2020-56 and the City’s new guidelines regarding the VMT thresholds of significance for the purposes of analyzing
Section 3 Initial Study/Environmental Checklist
3.3 Environmental Checklist | Transportation
City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 3-110 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022 transportation impacts under CEQA, the Project’s VMT is evaluated herein against these thresholds. These thresholds are also consistent with the recommended screening criteria contained in the State of California Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR)’s 2018 Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA (OPR, 2018).
The City’s Guidelines have established screening criteria pertaining to project trip generation forecasts, project land use types (i.e., local serving retail, affordable housing, etc.), proximity to transit, and locality within a low VMT-generating area. The City’s Guidelines provide the following three (3) types of potential screening criteria that may be applied to screen projects from project-level assessment: Transit Priority Areas Screening, Low VMT-generating Areas Screening, and Project Type Screening, all of which are described in detail in the Transportation Assessment (Appendix D, of this Draft IS/MND). Ten of the 13 Project Areas qualify for screening under one or more of the screening criteria described above, meaning that a less than significant impact to VMT can be assumed without further analysis. For the three Project Areas that do not qualify for screening (Area F, Area G, and Area J), further analysis was required, as described below.
As outlined in the City’s Guidelines, a project would result in a significant project-generated VMT impact if either of the following conditions are satisfied:
1. The baseline project-generated VMT per service population exceeds the 15 percent below the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments (SGVCOG) Southeast subarea baseline VMT per service population, or
2. The cumulative project-generated VMT per service population exceeds 15 percent below the SGVCOG Southeast subarea baseline VMT per service population The VMT expected to be generated by each of the 13 Project Areas was forecast using the SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool. As noted above, 10 of the 13 Project Areas screen out from a full VMT assessment. After applying the Increase Density TDM Measure (described below), the remaining three Project Areas would result in VMT per capita that is below the City’s threshold of 15 percent below the SGVCOG Southeast subarea baseline VMT per service population, as calculated by the SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool:
• Increase Residential Density (T-1): This measure accounts for the VMT reduction achieved by a project that is designed with a higher density of dwelling units (du) compared to the average residential density in the U.S. Increased densities affect the distance people travel and provide greater options for the mode of travel they choose. Increasing residential density results in shorter and fewer trips by single-occupancy vehicles and thus a reduction in GHG emissions.
Therefore, the Project is presumed to result in a less than significant transportation impact. The detailed SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool reports for each Project Area are contained in Appendix A of the Transportation Assessment (Appendix D, of this Draft IS/MND).
Long-term, or cumulative, effects of the Project on VMT were determined through a consistency check with the SCAG’s RTP/SCS. The RTP/SCS is the regional plan that demonstrates compliance with air quality conformity requirements and greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction
Section 3 Initial Study/Environmental Checklist
3.3 Environmental Checklist | Transportation
City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 3-111 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022 targets. As such, projects that are consistent with this plan in terms of development, location, density, and intensity, are part of the regional solution for meeting air pollution and GHG reduction goals. Projects that are deemed to be consistent would have a less than significant cumulative impact on VMT. Development in a location where the RTP/SCS does not specify any development may indicate a significant impact on transportation. However, as noted in the City’s Guidelines, for projects that do not demonstrate a project impact by applying an efficiency-based impact threshold (i.e., VMT per capita, VMT per employee, or VMT per service population) in the impact analysis, a less than significant project impact conclusion is sufficient in demonstrating there is no cumulative VMT impact. Projects that fall under the City’s efficiencybased impact thresholds are already shown to align with the long-term VMT and GHG reduction goals of SCAG’s RTP/SCS. Therefore, no cumulative VMT impacts are anticipated. A less than significant impact would occur in this regard. No mitigation is required. c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? Less than Significant Impact. While it is expected that the majority of construction activities for future development and redevelopment associated with the Project would be mostly confined onsite, construction activities could encroach into the public right-of-way along roadways adjacent to the Project Sites while curbside improvements are being made (e.g., sidewalks, driveways, underground facilities and infrastructure). In addition, slow-moving and large construction vehicles may be present in and around the Project Sites, which could reduce visibility and increase roadway congestion for other roadway users. However, in accordance with the City’s Public Works Department, construction contractors would develop a Construction Management Plan, subject to City review and approval, that would ensure that safe travel conditions are maintained for vehicles, bicycles, pedestrians, and transit vehicles. Therefore, construction of the Project would not introduce any geometric design features or incompatible uses, and this impact would be less than significant.
Future development and redevelopment associated with the Project would not make any modifications to the public roadway network, as all development would occur within existing parcels. Conceptual on-site circulation for the 141 parcels within 13 Project Areas that could be developed with implementation of the Project have not yet been developed. As detailed on-site circulation designs are developed, any new or reconfigured driveways and internal circulation would need to comply with the City’s Engineering Standards, which include design specifications to ensure safe and efficient travel of vehicles, bicycles, pedestrians, and transit vehicles.
Therefore, the Project would not introduce any geometric design features or incompatible uses, and this impact would be less than significant. No mitigation is required. d) Result in inadequate emergency access?
Less than Significant Impact. The Project Sites are located in an established urban area that is well served by the surrounding roadway network. While it is expected that the majority of construction activities associated with future development and redevelopment associated with the Project would be mostly confined on-site, construction activities may involve temporary lane
Section 3 Initial Study/Environmental Checklist
3.3 Environmental Checklist | Transportation
City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 3-112 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022 closures along roadways adjacent to the Project Sites while curbside improvements are being made (e.g., sidewalks, driveways, underground facilities and infrastructure). However, through-access for drivers, including emergency personnel, along all roadways will still be provided. In these instances, the construction contractors of future development and redevelopment associated with the Project would implement traffic control measures (e.g., construction flagmen, signage, etc.) consistent with required City encroachment permit(s) to maintain flow and access. Furthermore, in accordance with the City’s Public Works Department, construction contractors would develop a Construction Management Plan, subject to City review and approval, that includes designation of a haul routes to ensure that adequate emergency access is maintained during construction. Therefore, construction of the Project is not expected to result in inadequate emergency access, and a less than significant construction impact would occur.
With respect to operation of the Project, the LACFD, which provides fire and paramedic services for the City, and other relevant City departments would review the final design and on-site circulation of future development and redevelopment associated with the Project, to ensure that there is adequate emergency access. Therefore, operation of the Project is not expected to result in inadequate emergency access, and a less than significant construction impact would occur. No mitigation is required.
References
Covina, 2000. City of Covina, Covina General Plan Circulation Element, April 2000.
Covina, 2011. City of Covina, City of Covina Bicycle Master Plan, September 2011.
Covina, 2020. City of Covina, Transportation Study Guidelines for Vehicle Miles Traveled and Level of Service (LOS) Assessment, October 2020.
Covina, 2022. City of Covina Municipal Code, passed January 18, 2022, https://www.codepublishing.com/CA/Covina/, accessed April 2022.
LLG, 2022. Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers, Transportation Assessment Report: Covina Mixed-Use Overlay District, March 3, 2022.
ITE, 2021. Institute of Transportation Engineer’s Trip Generation Manual, 2021.
OPR, 2018. California Office of Planning and Research, Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA, April 2018.
State of California Governor’s OPR, Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA, December 2018.
Section 3 Initial Study/Environmental Checklist
3.3 Environmental Checklist | Tribal Cultural Resources City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 3-113 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022 Tribal Cultural Resources
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources):
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-thanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
XVIII. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES—Would the Project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is:
i) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources. Code
Section 5020.1(k), or
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
ii) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code
Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the
significance of the resource to a California Native
American tribe.
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
Discussion
Would the Project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is:
i) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources. Code Section 5020.1(k), or
ii) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe.
No Impact (ai–aii). The California NAHC, which maintains a confidential SLF containing sites of traditional, cultural, or religious value to the Native American community, was contacted on October 21, 2021, to request a search of the SLF. The NAHC indicated that the results of the SLF search were positive, but did not provide details on the resource(s) identified within the Project Sites. The NAHC recommended that the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation be
Section 3 Initial Study/Environmental Checklist
3.3 Environmental Checklist | Tribal Cultural Resources City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 3-114 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022 contacted for additional information. No additional information is available regarding the nature or location of the sacred land on file at the NAHC. The City conducted consultation with California Native American tribes pursuant to AB 52 to identify tribal cultural resources in or near the Project Sites (see Appendix E, of this Draft IS/MND).
On March 29, 2022, the City sent notification letters via email to the designated representative of one California Native American tribe (Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation). The letter provided brief descriptions of the Project and its locations, with maps, the lead agency’s contact information, and a notification that the tribe has 30 days to request consultation pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21080.3.1.
In an email dated March 31, 2022, the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation asked the City if ground disturbance was planned as part future development and redevelopment associated with the Project. On April 4, 2022, the City indicated that no ground disturbance was proposed, and as a result, the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation stated that there was no need for consultation. However, the tribe asked to be notified in the future if ground disturbance is proposed. As no tribal cultural resources were identified, the Project would have no impact on tribal cultural resources. Nevertheless, future development and redevelopment associated with the Project would be required to comply with applicable federal, state, and local regulations and, as appropriate, to undergo the City’s discretionary review process, including completion of subsequent project-level planning and environmental review under CEQA. These projects would similarly require compliance with AB 52 to ensure that tribal cultural resources are properly identified.
Section 3 Initial Study/Environmental Checklist
3.3 Environmental Checklist | Utilities and Service Systems City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 3-115 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022 Utilities and Service Systems
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources):
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-thanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
XIX. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS—Would the Project:
a) Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water
drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the Project and reasonably foreseeable future development during
normal, dry and multiple dry years?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
c) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the Project that it has adequate capacity to serve the Project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
e) Comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
Discussion
Would the Project:
a) Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects?
Less than Significant Impact. The Project consists of adding a new chapter of mixed-use overlay regulations to the City’s Zoning Ordinance and amending the City’s Official Zoning Map through the addition of a MUOD to various sites located in 141 parcels within 13 Project Areas.
As discussed in Section XIV, Population and Housing, the potential for 1,360 additional dwelling units associated with the Project could potentially result in approximately 4,216 additional residents in the City, assuming that all residents of the Project would relocate to the City.
Employment increases have the potential to generate indirect population growth, as they may draw additional persons and their households to the City. The MUOD applies on an as-requested, project-by-project basis. As such, the estimated indirect residential population generated from future commercial and industrial development and redevelopment associated with the Project has not been determined as specific commercial and industrial projects have not been proposed and submitted to the City. As such, implementation of the Project would result in increased water demand, wastewater generation, storm water drainage, electricity usage, natural gas usage, and demand for telecommunication services. However, due to the presence of existing infrastructure within the vicinity of the Project Sites, construction or relocation of facilities and services is not anticipated as further detailed below.
Section 3 Initial Study/Environmental Checklist
3.3 Environmental Checklist | Utilities and Service Systems City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 3-116 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022 Water
Water service is provided to the Project Site through the CIC, which obtains water from the Main San Gabriel Groundwater Basin and from the San Gabriel River (Covina, 2022). The City’s water supply sources include purchased treated local groundwater and treated surface water from the CIC and imported surface water supplies from the Three Valleys Municipal Water District, which is water that is imported by the Metropolitan Water District (MWD) of Southern California (Covina, 2022).
During construction of future development and redevelopment, there would be a temporary, intermittent demand for water for such activities as soil watering for site preparation, fugitive dust control, concrete preparation, cleanup, and other short-term activities. Construction-related water usage is not expected to have an adverse impact on available water supplies or the existing water distribution system.
Future development and redevelopment associated with the Project would involve the connection of new on-site water lines with surrounding existing infrastructure. However, due to the presence of existing infrastructure within the vicinity of the Project Sites, relocation or construction of water facilities and services is not anticipated. Implementation of future development and redevelopment associated with the Project could increase the intensity of uses on the Project Sites, resulting in increased water demand when compared to existing conditions of the Project Sites. According to the City’s 2015 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP), the reliable quantities of projected water supply for Year 2025 is 5,762 acre-feet (AF) per year; Year 2030 is 5,821 AF; Year 2035 is 5,800 AF; and Year 2040 is 5,940 AF (Covina, 2017). Because the exact nature, location, and operation of future development and redevelopment associated with the Project are unknown, quantification of water consumption would not be feasible and would be too speculative. However, it is anticipated that the estimated water consumption of future development and redevelopment associated with the Project would be within the CIC’s future projected water supply and would not, therefore, significantly impact existing and future water service. Further, the Project would comply with CALGreen, which requires water-efficient appliances and fixtures, thereby ensuring efficient use of water at the Project Sites. Lastly, the Project Applicants would be required to pay water connection fees. The CIC would use these fees, at least in part, to fund projects and programs necessary to meet the regulatory obligation with respect to treatment requirements, treatment capacity, and supply reliability. As such, the Project not require or result in the construction or expansion of water facilities. Impact would be less than significant in this regard. No mitigation is required.
Wastewater
Wastewater service is provided to the Project Site by the Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County (LACSD) (Covina, 2017). During construction of the Project, a negligible amount of wastewater would be generated by construction workers. It is anticipated that portable toilets would be provided by a private company and the waste disposed off-site. Wastewater generation from construction activities is not anticipated to cause a measureable increase in wastewater flows at a point where, and at a time when, a sewer’s capacity is already constrained or that would cause a sewer’s capacity to become constrained.
Section 3 Initial Study/Environmental Checklist
3.3 Environmental Checklist | Utilities and Service Systems City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 3-117 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022 Future development and redevelopment associated with the Project would tie into existing sewer lines surrounding the Project Sites. However, due to the presence of existing infrastructure within the vicinity of the Project Sites, relocation or construction of wastewater facilities and services is not anticipated. Implementation of future development and redevelopment associated with the Project could increase the intensity of uses on the Project Sites, resulting in increased demand for wastewater treatment services when compared to existing conditions of the Project Sites. The Project would deliver sewage into the City’s sewer collection system, which is operated and maintained by the City’s Public Works Department and treated by LACSD. The water reclamation plants serving the City include the San Jose Creek Water Reclamation Plant (SJCWRP) and the Joint Water Pollution Control Plant. The SJCWRP has the capacity to provide tertiary treatment for approximately 100 million gallons per day (MGD) and serves an estimated population of one million persons (LACSD, 2022a). The Joint Water Pollution Control Plant currently has the capacity to provide primary and secondary treatment for approximately 400 MGD of wastewater and serves an estimated population of 4.8 million persons (LACSD, 2022b).
Because the exact nature, location, and operation of future development and redevelopment associated with the Project are unknown, quantification of wastewater generation would not be feasible and would be too speculative. However, based on the capacities of the SJCWRP and the Joint Water Pollution Control Plant, it is anticipated the wastewater generated by the future development and redevelopment associated with the Project would be minimal. As such, the Project would not exceed current capacities of the wastewater treatment system and would not significantly impact existing wastewater treatment systems such that new facilities would be required. Further, the Project Applicants would be required to pay sewer connection fees. The providers would use these fees, at least in part, to fund projects and programs necessary to meet their regulatory obligation with respect to treatment requirements and treatment capacity. As such, the Project not require or result in the construction or expansion of wastewater facilities.
Impact would be less than significant in this regard. No mitigation is required.
Stormwater
Stormwater runoff is collected through existing inlets, catchment basins and underground storm drains that are maintained either privately or by the City (LARWQCB, 2014). Construction of future development and redevelopment associated with the Project would result in ground surface disruption during typical construction activities such as demolition, site preparation, and grading and excavation. However, compliance with project-specific erosion and sediment control plans that are required per the City’s Stormwater Quality and Urban Runoff Control Ordinance would ensure that stormwater runoff is minimized during construction, the extent feasible. Further, consistent with the requirements of the LA County NPDES, a SWPPP would be prepared that incorporates BMPs set forth in the project specific erosion and sediment control plans that would ensure a less than significant impact would occur to stormwater drainage infrastructure during construction.
As discussed in Section X, Hydrology and Water Quality, it is anticipated that the drainage patters of the Project Sites would not substantially change relative to existing conditions. The City would design and construct new facilities to capture and convey stormwater runoff and pollution in accordance with the existing LA County NPDES permits and the new MUOD Special Development Regulations Chapter. Permits to connect to existing storm drainage systems would be required to obtain prior to construction. All drainage plans are subject to City review
Section 3 Initial Study/Environmental Checklist
3.3 Environmental Checklist | Utilities and Service Systems City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 3-118 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022 and approval. In accordance with the LA County NPDES and the City’s Stormwater Quality and Urban Runoff Control Ordinance, the Project Applicants would be required to prepare and comply with a Low Impact Development (LID) Plan. Compliance with the City’s Stormwater Quality and Urban Runoff Control Ordinance would reduce the peak volume of stormwater runoff discharged into the City’s storm drain system and would ensure that stormwater is retained on-site, to the extent feasible. As such, future development and redevelopment of the Project would not require the construction or expansion of off-site stormwater drainage facilities. As such, impacts would be less than significant in this regard. No mitigation is required.
Electric Power
As discussed in Section VI, Energy, future development and redevelopment associated with the Project would be serviced by SCE. The electricity used for construction activities would be temporary and minimal; it would be within the supply and infrastructure service capabilities of SCE and it would not require additional local or regional capacity. The Project Sites would connect to the existing power grid. New electrical connections to the Project Sites would be install via undergrounded lines. Although future development and redevelopment would require new electrical line tie-ins for service, Project implementation would not result in the need for new electrical substations or electrical generating facilities. SCE conditions of approval would apply to the Project. As such, a less than significant impact would occur in this regard. No mitigation is required.
Natural Gas
As discussed in Section VI, Energy, SoCalGas would provide natural gas services to the Project Sites. The majority of the gas supply is transported via transmission pipelines owned by private companies. The Project Sites would utilize the existing SoCalGas distribution grid to service future development and redevelopment. All new connections and service installation would be reviewed and approved by SoCalGas and City’s Public Works Department. Any use of natural gas is anticipated to be sufficiently served by existing supply from SoCalGas and would not require additional local or regional capacity. Although future development and redevelopment would require new natural gas service connections, Project implementation would not result in the need for new natural gas supplies or infrastructure. As such, a less than significant impact would occur in this regard. No mitigation is required.
Telecommunication Facilities
The Project Sites are supported by telecommunication services from a variety of providers.
Spectrum provides residential and business services throughout the City. Fiber optic cables and high-speed connection services from wireless providers such as Spectrum are available to service the Project Sites. The Project Sites would be required to comply with all Federal, State and local regulations for installation and wiring of telecommunications to future development and redevelopment associated with the Project. With adherence to existing City and State electrical, building and safety code requirements, Project implementation would have a less than significant impact. No mitigation is required.
Section 3 Initial Study/Environmental Checklist
3.3 Environmental Checklist | Utilities and Service Systems City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 3-119 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022 b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the Project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years? Less than Significant Impact. As discussed in Section XIX(a), water service is provided to the Project Site through the CIC, which obtains water from the Main San Gabriel Groundwater Basin and from the San Gabriel River (Covina, 2022). The City’s water supply sources include purchased treated local groundwater and treated surface water from the CIC and imported surface water supplies from the Three Valleys Municipal Water District, which is water that is imported by the MWD of Southern California (Covina, 2022). According to the City’s 2015 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP), the reliable quantities of projected normal year water supply for Year 2025 is 5,762 AF per year; Year 2030 is 5,821 AF; Year 2035 is 5,800 AF; and Year 2040 is 5,940 AF. The projected single dry year water supply for Year 2025 is 5,506 AF per year; Year 2030 is 5,562 AF per year; Year 2035 is 5,618 AF per year; and Year 2040 is 5,676 per year. The projected multiple dry year water supply for Year 2025 is 5,506 AF per year for the first year, 5,734 AF per year for the second year, and 5,751 AF per year for the third year; Year 2030 is 5,562 AF per year for the first year, 5,792 AF per year for the second year, and 5,809 AF per year for the third year; Year 2035 is 5,618 AF per year for the first year, 5,851 AF per year for the second year, and 5,868 AF per year for the third year; and Year 2040 is 5,676 AF per year for the first year, 5,911 AF per year for the second year, and 5,928 AF per year for the third year (Covina, 2017). Because the exact nature, location, and operation of future development and redevelopment associated with the Project are unknown, quantification of water consumption would not be feasible and would be too speculative. However, it is anticipated that the estimated water consumption of future development and redevelopment associated with the Project would be within the CIC’s future projected water supply for normal, dry, and multiple dry years.
Further, the Project would comply with CALGreen, which requires water-efficient appliances and fixtures, thereby ensuring efficient use of water at the Project Sites. Lastly, the Project Applicants would be required to pay water connection fees. The CIC would use these fees, at least in part, to fund projects and programs necessary to meet the regulatory obligation with respect to treatment requirements, treatment capacity, and supply reliability. As such, a less than significant impact would occur in this regard. No mitigation is required.
c) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the Project that it has adequate capacity to serve the Project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments? Less than Significant Impact. As discussed in Section XIX(b), the Project would deliver sewage into the City’s sewer collection system, which is operated and maintained by the City’s Public Works Department and treated by LACSD. The water reclamation plants serving the City include SJCWRP and the Joint Water Pollution Control Plant. The SJCWRP has the capacity to provide tertiary treatment for approximately 100 MGD (LACSD, 2022a). The Joint Water Pollution Control Plant currently has the capacity to provide primary and secondary treatment for approximately 400 MGD of wastewater (LACSD, 2022b). Because the exact nature, location, and operation of future development and redevelopment associated with the Project are unknown, quantification of wastewater generation would not be feasible and would be too speculative.
However, based on the capacities of the SJCWRP and the Joint Water Pollution Control Plant, it
Section 3 Initial Study/Environmental Checklist
3.3 Environmental Checklist | Utilities and Service Systems City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 3-120 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022 is anticipated the wastewater generated by the future development and redevelopment associated with the Project would be minimal and would not exceed current capacities of these wastewater plants. As such, impacts would be less than significant in this regard. No mitigation is required. d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals?
Less than Significant Impact. Construction activities associated with future development and redevelopment of the Project would generate minor amounts of solid waste. The City’s Construction and Demolition Debris Management Program requires 75 percent of all construction waste materials be recycled. The City maintains an exclusive franchise agreement with Athens Services to carry out the City’s Construction and Demolition Diversion Program for construction contractor (Covina, 2022b). The City’s requirement of 75 percent construction waste diversion rate would reduce solid waste from construction associated with the future development and redevelopment associated with the Project. The remaining 25 percent of construction materials that are not required to be recycled would either be disposed of or voluntarily recycled at a solid waste facility with available capacity. Any hazardous wastes that are generated during construction activities would be managed and disposed of in compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws.
Future development and redevelopment would produce solid waste on a regular basis, in association with operation and maintenance activities. As discussed above, solid waste generated by the Project would be collected by Athens Services and transported to a local or regional landfill. Athens Services uses regional landfills in both Los Angeles County and San Bernardino County to dispose of waste from its collection, transfer, and disposal services. The Los Angeles County landfills have an estimated remaining permitted capacity of 142.67 million tons (County of Los Angeles, 2020). The remaining life of Los Angeles County landfills ranges from approximately 8 years for the Pebbly Beach Landfill to 35 years for the Savage Canyon Landfills (County of Los Angeles, 2020). San Bernardino County landfills have an estimated remaining capacity of 164,209,140 tons (County of San Bernardino, 2018). The remaining life of the San Bernardino County landfills is over 15 years (County of San Bernardino, 2018). Because the exact nature, location, and operation of future development and redevelopment associated with the Project are unknown, quantification of solid waste generation would not be feasible and would be too speculative. It is anticipated that solid waste generated by future development and redevelopment associated with the Project each year would be negligible relative to the remaining permitted capacity of both County landfills. As such, a less than significant impact would occur in this regard. No mitigation is required.
e) Comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste?
Less than Significant Impact. All local governments, including the City, are required under Assembly Bill 939 (AB 939), the Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989, to develop source reduction, reuse, recycling, and composting programs to reduce tonnage of solid waste going to
Section 3 Initial Study/Environmental Checklist
3.3 Environmental Checklist | Utilities and Service Systems City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 3-121 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022 landfills. The Project Applicants of future development and redevelopment associated with the Project are required to comply with all local, state, and federal requirements for integrated waste management (i.e., recycling, green waste) and solid waste disposal. Specifically, all future development and redevelopment would require to comply with the City’s Recycling and Waste Handling Requirement for construction and demolition debris, which requires at least 75 percent of all building and demolition materials to be recycled (Covina, 2022a). As discussed above, Athens Services currently transports all of the City’s residential and commercial recycling to a material recovery facility (MRF), where recyclable materials are sorted, and recyclables are separated and processed (Covina, 2022b). As a result, future development and redevelopment, which would be served by Athens Services, would be in compliance with applicable laws for recycling and disposal of solid waste. As such, a less than significant impact would occur in this regard. No mitigation is required.
References
County of Los Angeles, 2020. Los Angeles County Public Works, County of Los Angeles Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan, 2020 Annual Report, dated October 2021.
County of San Bernardino, 2018. County of San Bernardino Solid Waste Management Division, County of San Bernardino Countywide Siting Element, Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan, amended 2018.
Covina, 2017. City of Covina, 2015 Urban Water Management Plan, February 2017, https://covinaca.gov/sites/default/files/fileattachments/public_works/page/451/final_2015_uw mp_-_city_of_covina.pdf, accessed April 2022.
Covina, 2022a. City of Covina Website, Construction & Demolition Debris Management, https://covinaca.gov/publicworks/page/construction-demolition-debris-management, accessed April 2022.
Covina, 2022b. City of Covina Website, Construction & Demolition Debris Management Program, Background and Reference,
https://covinaca.gov/sites/default/files/fileattachments/public_works/page/579/background_a nd_reference.pdf, accessed April 2022.
LACSD, 2022a. San Jose Creek Water Reclamation Plant website, https://www.lacsd.org/services/wastewater-sewage/facilities/san-jose-creek-waterreclamationplant#:~:text=The%20facility%20currently%20has%20a,some%20of%20the%20attached%2 0documents., accessed April 2022.
LACSD, 2022b. Joint Water Pollution Control Plan (JWPCP) website, https://www.lacsd.org/services/wastewater-sewage/facilities/joint-water-pollution-controlplant, accessed April 2022.
LARWQCB, 2014. Los Angeles County Regional Water Quality Control Board (LARWQCB) Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) 2014.
Section 3 Initial Study/Environmental Checklist
3.3 Environmental Checklist | Wildfire
City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 3-122 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022 Wildfire
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources):
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-thanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
XX. WILDFIRE—If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the Project:
a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose Project occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
Discussion
Would the Project:
a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose Project occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment?
d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes?
No Impact (a–d). The CAL FIRE maps FHSZs, based on factors such as fuel, slope, and fire weather to identify the degree of fire hazard throughout California (i.e., moderate, high, or very high). While FHSZs do not predict when or where a wildfire will occur, they do identify areas where wildfire hazards could be more severe and therefore are of greater concern. The Project Sites are not designated as a State Responsibility Area nor are the Project Sites near a State Responsibility Area (CAL FIRE, 2020). According to the CAL FIRE, Covina Fire Hazards Severity Zone Map for the Local Responsible Areas, the Project Sites are designated as a nonVery High FHSZ (CAL FIRE, 2020). The Project Sites are outside of areas identified by CAL
Section 3 Initial Study/Environmental Checklist
3.3 Environmental Checklist | Wildfire
City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 3-123 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022 FIRE as having substantial or very high risk (CAL FIRE, 2020). Further, the Project Sites are located in a highly urbanized areas of the City and consist of developed lots generally comprising of commercial uses, asphalt surface parking lots, and ornamental landscaping and trees. No increase of wildfire hazard is expected as a result of the Project and the associated future development and redevelopment. Therefore, no impacts would occur in this regard.
References
CAL FIRE, 2020. California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, California Fire Hazard Severity Zone Viewer. [online]: https://egis.fire.ca.gov/FHSZ/, accessed April 2022.
Covina, 2000. City of Covina’s General Plan, Safety Element, adopted April 18, 2000.
Section 3 Initial Study/Environmental Checklist
3.3 Environmental Checklist | Mandatory Findings of Significance City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 3-124 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022 Mandatory Findings of Significance
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources):
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-thanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
XXI. Mandatory Findings of Significance—
a) Does the Project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major
periods of California history or prehistory?
☐ ☒ ☐ ☐
b) Does the Project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are
considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)?
☐ ☒ ☐ ☐
c) Does the Project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly?
☐ ☒ ☐ ☐
Discussion
a) Does the Project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory?
Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. As discussed under Section IV, Biological Resources, almost all native bird species, except game birds, are protected by State and federal statutes when they are actively nesting. Some avian species may nest, forage, and roost within ornamental shrubs and trees planted as part of existing landscaping and some species will nest on or in buildings and other man-made structures. Therefore, Project implementation may result in demolition, new construction, or substantial renovations of structures, such activities may affect nesting birds within the Project Sites. Therefore, measures to avoid adverse effects on nesting birds are recommended to be implemented prior to or during construction and demolition activities associated with Project and future development and redevelopment.
Implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-1 will reduce any potentially significant impacts to nesting birds to less than significant. No impacts to riparian or sensitive natural communities will occur as the result of implementation of the Project.
As discussed under Section V, Cultural Resources, there could be as-yet-unidentified subsurface archaeological resources present. Impacts to unknown archaeological resources qualifying as historical resources could result in a significant impact to historical resources. However,
Section 3 Initial Study/Environmental Checklist
3.3 Environmental Checklist | Mandatory Findings of Significance City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 3-125 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022 implementation of Mitigation Measure CUL-1, which would require the retention of a qualified archaeologist to oversee the preparation of an archaeological resources assessment, would reduce impacts to less than significant.
One historic architectural resource, consisting of a 1920s residence, is located within the Project Sites (Project Area K). This resource has not been previously evaluated for listing in the California Register or Covina’s local historic register, and it may qualify as a historical resource.
In addition, there are two adjacent historic architectural resources, one of which is listed in the California Register (Covina Bowl) and qualifies as a historical resource and one of which has not been previously evaluated for listing in the California Register or Covina’s local historic register and may qualify as a historical resource. There may also be other historic architectural resources in or adjacent to the Project Sites that could also qualify as historical resources. Impacts to historic architectural resources qualifying as historical resources could result in a significant impact to historical resources. However, implementation of Mitigation Measure CUL-2, which would require the retention of a qualified architectural historian to conduct a historic resources assessment, would reduce impacts to less than significant.
Future development and redevelopment associated with the Project would involve ground disturbing activities that, depending on their location, could result in disturbance of human remains or a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature. Such development could result in significant impacts to human remains under CEQA. However, implementation of Mitigation Measure CUL-3 and GEO-1 would reduce impacts to less than significant.
Mitigation Measure
Refer to Mitigation Measure BIO-1, CUL-1 through CUL-3, and GEO-1. b) Does the Project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. A cumulative impact could occur if the Project would result in an incrementally considerable contribution to a significant cumulative impact in consideration of the past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects for each resource area. The Project consists of adding a new chapter of mixed-use overlay regulations to the City’s Zoning Ordinance and amending the City’s Official Zoning Map through the addition of a MUOD to various sites located in 141 parcels within 13 Project Areas. The MUOD applies on an as-requested, project-by-project basis, to General Commercial (GC), Town Center Commercial (TC-C), and General Industrial (GI) general plan designations. The types and sizes of future development and redevelopment associated with the Project cannot be determined until specific projects have been proposed and submitted to the City. Because the exact nature, location, and operation of future development and redevelopment associated with the Project are unknown, defining a cumulative study area would be too speculative at this time. However, with implementation of Mitigation Measures AIR-1 through AIR-6, BIO-1, CUL-1 through CUL-3,
Section 3 Initial Study/Environmental Checklist
3.3 Environmental Checklist | Mandatory Findings of Significance City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 3-126 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022 GEO-1, GHG-1, HAZ-1 through HAZ-3, and NOI-1 through NOI-4, future development and redevelopment of the Project would not have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable and a less than significant impact would occur.
Mitigation Measures
Refer to Mitigation Measure AIR-1 through AIR-6, BIO-1, CUL-1 through CUL-3, GEO-1, GHG-1, HAZ-1 through HAZ-3, and NOI-1 through NOI-4. c) Does the Project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. Based on the analysis of the Project’s impacts in Sections I through XX, there is no indication that future development and redevelopment associated with the Project could result in substantial adverse effects on human beings. While there would be a variety of effects related to air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, paleontological resources, greenhouse gas emissions, hazards and hazardous materials, and noise, these impacts would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated, as necessary. The analysis herein concludes that direct and indirect environmental effects will, at most, require mitigation to reduce potentially significant impacts to less than significant levels.
Generally, environmental effects will result in less than significant impacts. Based on the analysis in this Draft IS/MND, the City finds that direct and indirect impacts to human beings will be less than significant with mitigation incorporated, as necessary.
Mitigation Measures
Refer to Mitigation Measure AIR-1 through AIR-6, BIO-1, CUL-1 through CUL-3, GEO-1, GHG-1, HAZ-1 through HAZ-3, and NOI-1 through NOI-4.
City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 4-1 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022 SECTION 4
Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program
4.1 CEQA Requirements
Table 4-1 is a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) for the City’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project, which has been prepared pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15097 and Public Resources Code Section 21081.6. This MMRP lists all applicable mitigation measures from the IS/MND. The appropriate timing of implementation and responsible party are identified to ensure proper enforcement of the mitigation measures from the IS/MND to reduce Project impacts to less than significant levels. Mitigation measures are presented in the same order as they occur in the IS/MND.
The columns in the MMRP table provide the following information:
• Mitigation Measure(s): The action(s) that will be taken to reduce the impact to a less than significant level.
• Implementation Action: The action(s) listed out, according to the identified mitigation measure that would be implemented by the responsible agency. • Responsible Implementation Agency: The agency or private entity responsible for ensuring implementation of the mitigation measure. For the Project, the City of Covina, as the CEQA Lead Agency, remains responsible for ensuring that implementation of the mitigation measures occur in accordance with the MMRP (CEQA Guidelines Section 15097(a)). • Timing of Verification: The general timing for implementing each mitigation measure. • Verification Date: The date in which the mitigation measure has been completed.
The MMRP will be kept on file at the following address:
City of Covina, Community Development Department
125 E. College Avenue
Covina CA 91723
Section 4 Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program
4.1 CEQA Requirements
City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 4-2 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022 TABLE 4-1
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM FOR THE CITY OF COVINA’S MIXED-USE OVERLAY DISTRICT PROJECT Mitigation Measure Implementation Action
Responsible Implementation
Agency/Party
Timing of
Verification
Verification
Date
Air Quality
Mitigation Measure AIR-1: Construction Emissions. If, during subsequent project-level environmental review, construction-related criteria air pollutants are determined to have the potential to exceed the applicable South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) thresholds of significance, the City shall require applicants for future development and redevelopment associated with the Project to incorporate one or more of the following mitigation measures as necessary to reduce air pollutant emissions during construction activities to below the applicable SCAQMD thresholds of significance. Mitigation measures that may be identified during the environmental review include, but are not limited to:
1. Using construction equipment rated by the USEPA as having Tier 3 (model year 2006 or newer) or Tier 4 (model year 2008 or newer) emission limits, applicable for engines between 50 and 750 horsepower, as commercially available.
2. Using construction equipment that are equipped with a California Air Resources Board (CARB) verified Level 3 diesel particulate matter filter, applicable for engines between 50 and 750 horsepower, as commercially available.
3. Ensuring construction equipment is properly serviced and maintained to the manufacturer’s standards.
4. Limiting nonessential idling of construction equipment to less than five consecutive minutes at a location.
5. Water all active construction areas at least three times daily or four times daily if needed to control dust emissions. Watering should be sufficient to prevent airborne dust from leaving the site. Reclaimed water should be used whenever possible.
6. Increased watering frequency may be necessary whenever wind speeds exceed 15 miles per hour. Construction activities should be suspended during periods with wind speed gusts of 25 miles per hour or more.
7. Apply non-toxic chemical soil stabilizers, in lieu of watering, in sufficient quantities to control dust emissions and prevent visible dust from leaving the construction site.
8. Pave, apply water three times daily or as often as necessary to control dust, or apply non-toxic chemical soil stabilizers on all unpaved access roads, parking areas, and staging areas at construction sites.
The City shall require
applicants for future
development and
redevelopment associated
with the Project to
incorporate one or more of
the following mitigation
measures as necessary to
reduce air pollutant
emissions during
construction activities to
below the applicable
SCAQMD thresholds of
significance.
City of Covina During project-level
environmental review.
Section 4 Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program
4.1 CEQA Requirements
City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 4-3 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022 Mitigation Measure Implementation Action
Responsible Implementation
Agency/Party
Timing of
Verification
Verification
Date
9. Cover all trucks hauling soil, sand, and other loose materials or require all trucks to maintain at least two feet of freeboard (i.e., the minimum required space between the top of the load and the top of the trailer).
10. Sweep daily (with water sweepers using reclaimed water if possible), or as often as needed, all paved access roads, parking areas, and staging areas at the construction site to control dust.
11. Sweep public streets daily (with water sweepers using reclaimed water if possible) in the vicinity of the Project Sites, or as often as needed, to keep streets free of visible soil material.
12. Hydroseed or apply non-toxic soil stabilizers to inactive construction areas.
13. Enclose, cover, water three times daily, or apply non-toxic chemical soil binders to exposed stockpiles (dirt, sand, etc.).
AIR-2: Architectural Coating VOC Emissions. If, during subsequent project-level environmental review, it is determined that construction or operation of a project has the potential to exceed the applicable South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) thresholds of significance for volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from architectural coating activities, the City shall require the use of Super-Compliant VOC-content architectural coatings (10 grams per liter or less of VOCs) to be used during application of paints and other architectural coatings. If Super-Compliant VOC-content architectural coatings cannot be utilized, the developer shall reduce the quantity of paints and other architectural coatings applied in any one day as necessary to reduce VOC emissions from all project sources to below the SCAQMD thresholds of significance for VOCs (i.e., to below 75 pounds of VOC per day during construction activities and below 55 pounds of VOC per day during operational activities).
The City shall require the use
of Super-Compliant VOCcontent architectural coatings
(10 grams per liter or less of
VOCs) to be used during
application of paints and
other architectural coatings.
City of Covina During project-level
environmental review.
AIR-3: Energy Conservation. The City shall require energy conservation measures during future project-level environmental review, which may include the following:
• Install Energy Star rated heating, cooling, lighting, and appliances. • Use of Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) equipment with a Seasonal Energy Efficiency Ratio (SEER) of 12 or higher. • Installation of water heaters with an energy factor of 0.92 or higher. • Install solar water heaters or tank-less water heaters. • Use passive solar cooling/heating.
• Use cool roofs and surfaces for residential and non-residential buildings. • Encourage strategic tree planting and shading to reduce building energy demand for cooling.
The City shall require energy
conservation measures
during future project-level
environmental review.
City of Covina During project-level
environmental review.
Section 4 Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program
4.1 CEQA Requirements
City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 4-4 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022 Mitigation Measure Implementation Action
Responsible Implementation
Agency/Party
Timing of
Verification
Verification
Date
• Encourage the use of electric building energy systems in place of building natural gas systems.
AIR-4: Transportation Efficiency. The City shall require transportation efficiency measures during future project-level environmental review, which may include the following:
• Implement transportation demand management (TDM) strategies to reduce VMT from project operations.
• Provide residents and employees of projects with information regarding public transportation options.
• Provide residents and employees of projects with bicycle parking facilities that meet or exceed municipal code requirements. • Provide residents and employees of projects with electric vehicle supply equipment that meet or exceed municipal code requirements.
The City shall require
transportation efficiency
measures during future
project-level environmental
review.
City of Covina During project-level
environmental review.
AIR-5: Stationary Sources. Applicants for new or modified stationary sources associated with the Project that: 1) have the potential to generate 40 or more diesel trucks per day and 2) are located within 1,000 feet of a sensitive land use (e.g. residential, schools, hospitals, nursing homes), as measured from the property line of the Project to the property line of the nearest sensitive use, shall submit a health risk assessment (HRA) to the County Department of Regional Planning prior to future discretionary project approval. The HRA shall be prepared in accordance with policies and procedures of the state Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) and the applicable air quality management district. If the HRA shows that the incremental cancer risk exceeds ten in one million (10E-06), particulate matter concentrations would exceed 2.5 μg/m3, or the appropriate noncancer hazard index exceeds 1.0, the applicant will be required to identify and demonstrate that best available control technologies for toxics (T BACTs) are capable of reducing potential cancer and noncancer risks to an acceptable level, including appropriate enforcement mechanisms.
T-BACTs may include, but are not limited to, restricting idling onsite or electrifying warehousing docks to reduce diesel particulate matter, or requiring use of newer equipment and/or vehicles. T-BACTs identified in the HRA shall be identified as mitigation measures in the environmental document and/or incorporated into the site development plan as a component of the Project.
Submit a health risk
assessment (HRA) to the
County Department of
Regional Planning prior to
future discretionary project
approval.
City of Covina
County Department of
Regional Planning
During project-level
environmental review.
Prior to future
discretionary project
approval.
AIR 6: Health Risk Assessment. Applicants shall submit a HRA to the County prior to future discretionary project approval for sensitive land uses associated with the Project within the following distances as measured from the property line of the Project to the property line of the source/edge of the nearest travel lane, from these facilities:
• Industrial facilities within 1,000 feet.
Applicants shall submit a
HRA to the County prior to
future discretionary project
approval for sensitive land
uses associated with the
Project.
City of Covina During project-level
environmental review.
Prior to future
discretionary project
approval.
Section 4 Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program
4.1 CEQA Requirements
City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 4-5 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022 Mitigation Measure Implementation Action
Responsible Implementation
Agency/Party
Timing of
Verification
Verification
Date
• Distribution centers (40 or more trucks per day) within 1,000 feet. • Major transportation projects (50,000 or more vehicles per day) within 1,000 feet.
• Gasoline dispensing facilities within 300 feet.
• The HRA shall be prepared in accordance with policies and procedures of the applicable Air Quality Management District. If the HRA shows that the incremental cancer risk exceeds ten in one million (10E-06) or the appropriate noncancer hazard index exceeds 1.0, the applicant will be required to identify and demonstrate that mitigation measures are capable of reducing potential cancer and non-cancer risks to an acceptable level (i.e., below ten in one million or a hazard index of 1.0), including appropriate enforcement mechanisms. Measures to reduce risk may include but are not limited to:
• Air intakes located away from high volume roadways and/or truck loading zones, unless it can be demonstrated to the County Department of Regional Planning that there are operational limitations. • Heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems of the buildings provided with appropriately sized maximum efficiency rating value (MERV) filters.
Biological Resources
Mitigation Measure BIO-1: Nesting Birds. Vegetation removal shall be conducted between September 1 and January 31, outside the typical nesting season for birds in the region. If vegetation removal must occur during the typical nesting season (February 1 – August 31), a qualified biologist shall conduct a pre-construction survey for active nests within areas that will be subject to vegetation removal, construction noise, and/or ground disturbances, including a 100 to 300-foot buffer around existing trees and landscaped areas, to identify any potential active nests. Buffer distances should be adjusted at the discretion of the biologist based on the location of the nest, species, and surrounding land uses. If no sign of nesting activity is observed, construction may proceed without potential impacts to nesting birds.
If an active nest is observed during the pre-construction clearance survey, an adequate buffer determined by the qualified biologist shall be established around the active nest depending on sensitivity of the species and proximity to construction activity and impact areas. Onsite construction monitoring may also be required to ensure that no direct or indirect impacts occur to the active nest or nesting activities. Construction activities shall be avoided within the buffer, unless otherwise approved by the monitoring biologist (e.g., vehicles could pass through buffer areas while jackhammering would be restricted). Buffers shall be clearly marked and defined to restrict certain Conduct all vegetation
removal between September
1 and January 31, outside
the typical nesting season for
birds in the region.
If vegetation removal must
occur during the typical
nesting season (February 1 –
August 31), a qualified
biologist shall conduct a preconstruction survey for active nests within areas that will be
subject to vegetation
removal, construction noise,
and/or ground disturbances,
including a 100 to 300-foot
buffer around existing trees
and landscaped areas, to
identify any potential active
nests.
City of Covina
Qualified Project Biologist
Project Contractor
Prior to and during
grading and/or
construction.
Section 4 Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program
4.1 CEQA Requirements
City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 4-6 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022 Mitigation Measure Implementation Action
Responsible Implementation
Agency/Party
Timing of
Verification
Verification
Date
activities where they could result in nest failure, and shall remain in place until nests are no longer active, as determined by the monitoring biologist.
If an active nest is observed
during the pre-construction
clearance survey, an
adequate buffer determined
by the qualified biologist shall
be established around the
active nest depending on
sensitivity of the species and
proximity to construction
activity and impact areas.
Cultural Resources
Mitigation Measure CUL-1: Prior to the issuance of ground disturbing activities of future development and redevelopment associated with the Project, the City shall retain a qualified archaeologist, defined as meeting the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards for archaeology, to conduct an archaeological resources assessment including:
a records search at the South Central Coastal Information Center; a Sacred Lands File search at the Native American Heritage Commission; a pedestrian field survey, where deemed appropriate by the qualified archaeologist; recordation of all identified archaeological resources on California Department of Parks and Recreation 523 forms; a subsurface archaeological sensitivity assessment; and preparation of a technical report documenting the methods and results of the study. If an archaeological resource is identified as a result of the survey, the qualified archaeologist will prepare and conduct a testing program to delineate the resource’s boundaries and identify presence/absence of subsurface deposits. The results of the testing will be included in the technical report. If an archaeological resource cannot be avoided, it shall be evaluated for significance. The qualified archaeologist shall also provide recommendations regarding archaeological and Native American monitoring, protection of avoided resources and/or recommendations for additional work or treatment of significant resources that will be affected by the Project. When assessing significance and developing treatment for resources that are Native American in origin, the City shall consult with local Native American Tribes.
Prior to the issuance of
ground disturbing activities of
future development and
redevelopment associated
with the Project, the City shall
retain a qualified
archaeologist.
If an archaeological resource
is identified as a result of the
survey, the qualified
archaeologist will prepare
and conduct a testing
program to delineate the
resource’s boundaries and
identify presence/absence of
subsurface deposits.
City of Covina
Qualified Archaeologist
Project Contractor
Prior to the issuance
of ground disturbing
activities.
Prior to
commencement of
excavation activities.
Mitigation Measure CUL-2: Prior to the issuance of ground disturbing activities of future development and redevelopment associated with the Project on parcels that contain or are adjacent to buildings or structures more than 45 years old, the City shall retain a qualified architectural historian, defined as meeting the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards for architectural history, to conduct a historic resources assessment including: a records search at the South Central Coastal Information Center; a review of pertinent archives and sources; a pedestrian field survey; recordation of all identified historic architectural Prior to the issuance of
ground disturbing activities of
future development and
redevelopment associated
with the Project on parcels
that contain or are adjacent
to buildings or structures
more than 45 years old, the
City of Covina
Qualified Architectural
Historian
Project Contractor
Prior to and during
grading and/or
construction.
Section 4 Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program
4.1 CEQA Requirements
City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 4-7 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022 Mitigation Measure Implementation Action
Responsible Implementation
Agency/Party
Timing of
Verification
Verification
Date
resources on California Department of Parks and Recreation 523 forms; evaluation of resources for listing in the California Register and for local listing; and preparation of a technical report documenting the methods and results of the assessment. All identified historical resources will be assessed for the Project’s potential to result in direct and/or indirect effects to those resources. The qualified architectural historian shall provide recommendations regarding additional work or treatment for historical resources that will be affected by the Project prior to their demolition or alteration. This could include but is not limited to compliance with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties, Historic American Buildings Survey (HABS) recordation, incorporation of interpretive elements into new construction, or commemoration.
In addition, the qualified architectural historian shall review project plans for future development and redevelopment associated with the Project adjacent to historical resources to ensure there will be no indirect effects.
City shall retain a qualified
architectural historian.
The qualified architectural
historian shall provide
recommendations regarding
additional work or treatment
for historical resources that
will be affected by the Project
prior to their demolition or
alteration.
Mitigation Measure CUL-3: If human remains are encountered, then the City or its contractor shall immediately halt work in the vicinity (within 50 feet) of the discovery and contact the Los Angeles County Coroner in accordance with Public Resources Code Section 5097.98 and Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, which requires that no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to the remains’ origin and disposition pursuant. If the County Coroner determines the remains are Native American, then the Coroner will notify the NAHC within 24 hours in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5(c), and Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. The NAHC shall then identify the person(s) thought to be the MLD. The MLD may, with the permission of the land owner, or their authorized representative, inspect the site of the discovery of the Native American remains and may recommend to the owner or the person responsible for the excavation work means for treating or disposing, with appropriate dignity, the human remains and any associated grave goods. The MLD shall complete their inspection and make their recommendation within 48 hours of being granted access by the landowner to inspect the discovery. The recommendation may include the scientific removal and nondestructive analysis of human remains and items associated with Native American burials. The City and the landowner shall discuss and confer with the MLD on all reasonable options regarding the MLD’s preferences for treatment.
Until the City and the landowner have conferred with the MLD, the contractor shall ensure that the immediate vicinity where the discovery occurred is not disturbed by further activity and is adequately protected according to generally accepted cultural or archaeological standards or practices, and that further activities take into account the possibility of multiple burials.
If human remains are
encountered, the contractor
should halt work in the
vicinity (within 100 feet) of
the find and contact the Los
Angeles County Coroner in
accordance with PRC
Section 5097.98 and Health
and Safety Code Section
7050.5. If the County
Coroner determines that the
remains are Native
American, the California
Native American Heritage
Commission (NAHC) will be
notified in accordance with
Health and Safety Code
Section 7050.5, subdivision
(c), and PRC Section
5097.98 (as amended by
Assembly Bill 2641). The
NAHC will designate a Most
Likely Descendent (MLD) for
the remains per PRC Section
5097.98.
City of Covina
Qualified Archaeologist
Project Contractor
Prior to and during
grading and/or
construction.
Section 4 Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program
4.1 CEQA Requirements
City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 4-8 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022 Mitigation Measure Implementation Action
Responsible Implementation
Agency/Party
Timing of
Verification
Verification
Date
If the NAHC is unable to identify an MLD, or the MLD identified fails to make a recommendation, or the landowner rejects the recommendation of the MLD and the mediation provided for in Section 5097.94(k), if invoked, fails to provide measures acceptable to the landowner, the landowner or his or her authorized representative shall inter the human remains and items associated with Native American human remains with appropriate dignity on the property in a location not subject to further and future subsurface disturbance.
Geology and Soils
Mitigation Measure GEO-1: Prior to construction of future development and redevelopment associated with the Project that involve ground disturbance below 10 feet in Pleistocene alluvium or marine Puente Formation sediments, the City shall retain a qualified paleontologist who meets the (SVP) Standards (SVP, 2010) to develop and oversee construction worker paleontological resources sensitivity training program and paleontological monitoring. All initial ground disturbance below 10 feet deep shall be monitored full-time by a qualified paleontological monitor (SVP 2010) working under the direct supervision of the qualified paleontologist.
Monitoring may be reduced to periodic spot checks or ceased entirely at the discretion of the qualified paleontologist, based on subsurface observations and the likelihood of encountering fossiliferous sediments. The qualified paleontologist shall also consider whether screen washing sediments is necessary to recover smaller specimens. All recovered fossils shall be prepared for identification to the lowest taxonomic level possible, cataloged, and curated at an accredited facility with retrievable storage. The qualified paleontologist shall prepare a final report to be submitted to the City and filed with the curation facility and Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County.
Prior to construction of future
development and
redevelopment associated
with the Project that involve
ground disturbance below 10
feet in Pleistocene alluvium
or marine Puente Formation
sediments, the City shall
retain a qualified
paleontologist.
All initial ground disturbance
below 10 feet deep shall be
monitored full-time by a
qualified paleontological
monitor (SVP 2010) working
under the direct supervision
of the qualified
paleontologist.
All recovered fossils shall be
prepared for identification to
the lowest taxonomic level
possible, cataloged, and
curated at an accredited
facility with retrievable
storage.
The qualified paleontologist
shall prepare a final report to
be submitted to the City and
filed with the curation facility
and Natural History Museum
of Los Angeles County.
City of Covina
Qualified Paleontologist
Project Contractor
Prior to and during
grading and/or
construction.
Section 4 Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program
4.1 CEQA Requirements
City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 4-9 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022 Mitigation Measure Implementation Action
Responsible Implementation
Agency/Party
Timing of
Verification
Verification
Date
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Mitigation Measure GHG-1: Water Conservation. The City shall require water conservation measures during future project-level environmental review, which may include the following:
• Utilize the model energy efficiency code to encourage drought-tolerant landscaping and the use of water-efficient irrigation systems. • Use drought-tolerant, low water, and/or native vegetation for landscaping.
• Use water efficient irrigation systems.
The City shall require water
conservation measures
during future project-level
environmental review.
City of Covina Project-level
environmental review.
Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Mitigation Measure HAZ-1: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment:
Prior to the initiation of any construction requiring ground-disturbing activities on industrial and commercial properties, as well as listed active hazardous materials cleanup sites, Project Applicants shall complete a Phase I environmental site assessment for that property in accordance with American Society for Testing and Materials Standard E1527 for those active hazardous materials sites to ascertain their current status. Any recommended follow up sampling (i.e., Phase II activities) set forth in the Phase I assessment shall be implemented prior to construction. The results of Phase II studies, if necessary, shall be submitted to the local overseeing agency and any required remediation or further delineation of identified contamination shall be completed prior to commencement of construction.
Project Applicants shall
complete a Phase I
environmental site
assessment for that property
in accordance with American
Society for Testing and
Materials Standard E1527 for
those active hazardous
materials sites to ascertain
their current status.
City of Covina Prior to the initiation
of any construction
requiring grounddisturbing activities,
as well as listed
active hazardous
materials cleanup
sites.
Mitigation Measure HAZ-2: Health and Safety Plan: For those properties for which the Phase I assessment identifies hazardous materials issues, before the start of ground-disturbing activities, including grading, trenching, or excavation, or structure demolition, the Project Applicants for the specific work proposed shall require that the construction contractor(s) retain a qualified professional to prepare a site-specific health and safety plan (HASP) in accordance with federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration regulations (29 CFR 1910.120) and California Occupational Safety and Health Administration regulations (8 CCR Section 5192).
The HASP shall be implemented by the construction contractor to protect construction workers, the public, and the environment during all grounddisturbing and structure demolition activities. The HASP shall include designation of a site health and safety officer, a summary of the anticipated risks, a description of personal protective equipment and decontamination procedures, and procedures to follow if evidence of potential soil or groundwater contamination is encountered.
Project Applicants for the
specific work proposed shall
require that the construction
contractor(s) retain a
qualified professional to
prepare a site-specific health
and safety plan (HASP).
City of Covina
Project Contractor
Qualified Professional to
prepare HASP
Before the start of
ground-disturbing
activities, including
grading, trenching, or
excavation, or
structure demolition.
Mitigation Measure HAZ-3: Soil and Groundwater Management Plan: In support of the HASP described in Mitigation Measure HAZ-2, the Project The Project Applicants shall
require that its contractor(s)
City of Covina Before the start of
ground-disturbing
Section 4 Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program
4.1 CEQA Requirements
City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 4-10 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022 Mitigation Measure Implementation Action
Responsible Implementation
Agency/Party
Timing of
Verification
Verification
Date
Applicants shall require that its contractor(s) develop and implement a Soil and Groundwater Management Plan (SGMP) for the management of soil and groundwater before any ground-disturbing activity. The SGMP shall describe the hazardous materials that may be encountered, the roles and responsibilities of on-site workers and supervisors, training for site workers focused on the recognition of and response to encountering hazardous materials, and protocols for the materials (soil and/or dewatering effluent) testing, handling, removing, transporting, and disposing of all excavated materials and dewatering effluent in a safe, appropriate, and lawful manner. develop and implement a Soil
and Groundwater
Management Plan (SGMP).
Project Contractor activities, including
grading, trenching, or
excavation, or
structure demolition.
Noise
Mitigation Measure NOI-1: Construction Hours. Construction activities occurring as part of the future development and redevelopment associated with the Project shall be subject to the limitations which states that construction activities may occur between 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. Mondays through Saturdays. No construction activities shall be permitted outside of these hours or on Sundays and federal holidays unless a temporary waiver is granted by the City.
Construction activities shall
be subject to the limitations
which states that construction
activities may occur between
7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m.
Mondays through Saturdays.
City of Covina
Project Contractor
During construction.
Mitigation Measure NOI-2: Construction Best Management Practices.
Prior to issuance of grading permits for future development and redevelopment associated with the Project, the Project Applicants shall incorporate the following measures as a note on the grading plan cover sheet to ensure that the greatest distance between noise sources and sensitive receptors during construction activities have been achieved. • Construction equipment, fixed or mobile, shall be equipped with properly operating and maintained noise mufflers consistent with manufacturers’ standards.
• Construction staging areas shall be located away from off-site sensitive uses during construction of the Project.
• The Project Contractors shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the Project Sites, whenever feasible.
The Project Applicants shall
incorporate measures as a
note on the grading plan
cover sheet to ensure that
the greatest distance
between noise sources and
sensitive receptors during
construction activities have
been achieved.
City of Covina
Project Applicants
Prior to issuance of
grading permits.
Mitigation Measure NOI-3: Building Design Noise Control Measures.
Design standards for proposed new multifamily residential uses within the Project Sites may include but are not limited to:
• Dwelling units that would be exposed to traffic noise levels exceeding 57 dBA CNEL: A form of fresh air supply, such as air conditioning systems, will be required.
• Dwelling units that would be exposed to traffic noise levels exceeding 65 dBA CNEL: Outdoor living areas such as balcony or deck on the side of the buildings exposed to high traffic noise should not be allowed unless noise mitigation measures, such as barrier walls with a minimum height Building design noise control
measures.
City of Covina
Project Contractor
During project-level
environmental review.
Prior to construction.
Section 4 Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program
4.1 CEQA Requirements
City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 4-11 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022 Mitigation Measure Implementation Action
Responsible Implementation
Agency/Party
Timing of
Verification
Verification
Date
of 5 feet with adequate materials (CMU, wood, Plexiglas) with no holes or gaps, along the perimeter of the outdoor living areas are included. • Dwelling units that would be exposed to traffic noise levels exceeding 69 dBA CNEL: Windows associated with bedrooms and living/family rooms on the side of the buildings exposed to high traffic noise will be required to have building façade upgrades, such as using windows with Sound Transmission Class (STC) ratings higher than standard building practice (up to STC-28).
Mitigation Measure NOI-4: Stationary Sources Noise Control Measures. Due to the nature of mixed use overlay, some residences may be exposed to noise sources from the operations of the commercial uses nearby or down below. Such noise sources include loading/unloading activity and outdoor mechanical equipment and the following design standards are recommended.
• Loading areas associated with commercial uses within the Project Sites should be placed away from outdoor living areas associated with residential uses. Noise barriers with sufficient height to block the line-ofsight between the loading areas and outdoor living areas in proximity of the loading areas will be required.
• Stationary outdoor mechanical equipment should be placed away from residential outdoor living areas or be enclosed with a structure to minimize the potential noise impacts.
• All noise sources shall follow the City’s Municipal Code noise control ordinance requirements.
Stationary sources noise
control measures
City of Covina
Project Contractor
During project-level
environmental review.
Prior to construction.
Section 4 Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program
4.1 CEQA Requirements
City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 4-12 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022
INTENTIONALLY BLANK
City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 5-1 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022 SECTION 5
List of Preparers and Acronyms
5.1 List of Preparers
5.1.1 Lead Agency
City of Covina, Community Development Department
125 E. College Avenue, Covina, CA 91723
• Nancy Fong, AICP, Principal Planner
5.1.2 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
Preparation
ESA
80 South Lake Avenue
Pasadena, CA 91101
• Ruta K. Thomas, Senior Vice President/Southern CA Regional Director (Project Director) • Brian Allee, Managing Associate (Project Manager)
• Alan Sako, Director (Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Energy, Noise) • Tony Chung, Principal Associate (Noise)
• Michael Stewart, Air Quality and Acoustical Analyst (Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Energy, Noise)
• Scott Holbrook, Principal Ecologist (Biological Resources) • Amanda French, Biologist (Biological Resources)
• Fatima Clark, Cultural Resources Specialist (Cultural Resources) • Brandon Carroll, Environmental Scientist (Hazards and Hazardous Materials) • Stephanie Breeden, Senior Managing Associate (Hydrology and Water Quality) • Shadde Rosenblum, Senior Technical Associate (Transportation) • Stephan Geissler, Managing Associate (GIS/Graphics)
• Denise Kaneshiro, Senior Graphic Designer (Graphics)
Section 5 List of Preparers and Acronyms
5.2 Acronyms
City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 5-2 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022
5.1.3 Technical Subconsultant
Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers
600 South Lake Avenue, Suite 500
Pasadena, CA 91106
• Clare Look-Jaeger, P.E., Principal
• Francesca Bravo, Senior Transportation Engineer
5.2 Acronyms
Acronym/Abbreviation Definition
AB Assembly Bill
ACM Asbestos-Containing Material
ADT Average Daily Traffic
AF Acre-Feet
AQMP Air Quality Management Plan
BACT Best Available Control Technology
BERD Built Environment Resource Directory
BMPs Best Management Practices
CAAQS California Ambient Air Quality Standards
CAISO California Independent System Operator
CBC California Building Code
CalEEMod California Emissions Estimator Model
Cal Fire California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection CalRecycle California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery CAPCOA California Air Pollution Control Officers Association CARB California Air Resources Board
CBC California Building Code
CCR California Code of Regulations
CDFA California Department of Food and Agriculture
CDFW California Department of Fish and Wildlife
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
CFC California Fire Code
CGS California Geological Survey
CH4 Methane
CHL California Historical Landmark
CIC Covina Irrigating Company
City City of Covina
CNDDB California Natural Diversity Database
CNEL Community Noise Level Equivalent
CNPS California Native Plant Society
Section 5 List of Preparers and Acronyms
5.2 Acronyms
City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 5-3 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022 Acronym/Abbreviation Definition
CNRA California Natural Resources Agency
CO Carbon Monoxide
CO2 Carbon Dioxide
CO2e Carbon Dioxide Equivalents
COUSD Charter Oak Unified School District
County County of Los Angeles
CPD Covina Police Department
CPL Covina Public Library
CUPA Certified Unified Program Agency
CVRP Clean Vehicle Rebate Pilot
CVUSD Covina Valley Unified School District
CWA Clean Water Act
DB Decibels
dBA A-weighted Sound Pressure Level
DBH Diameter at Breast Height
DPM Diesel Particulate Matter
DTSC California Department of Toxic Substances Control
DU Dwelling Unit
EFMP Enhanced Fleet Modernization Program
EIR Environmental Impact Report
FHSZ Fire Hazard Severity Zone
FRAP Fire and Resource Assessment Program
FTA Federal Transportation Administration
GC General Commercial
GHG Greenhouse Gas Emissions
GI General Industrial
GVW Gross Vehicle Weight
GWP Global Warming Potential
HABS Historic American Buildings Survey
HASP Health and Safety Plan
HCD Housing and Community Development
HFCs Hydrofluorocarbons
HMBPs Hazardous Materials Business Plans
HQTA High-Quality Transit Areas
HRA Health Risk Assessment
HVAC Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditions
I- Interstate
IN/SEC Inches per Second
IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
IS/MND Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
Section 5 List of Preparers and Acronyms
5.2 Acronyms
City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 5-4 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022 Acronym/Abbreviation Definition
ITE Institute of Transportation Engineers
LACFD Los Angeles County Fire Department
LACM Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County
LACSD Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County
LARWQCB Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board LBP Lead-Based Paint
Ldn Average Equivalent Sound Level Over a 24 Hour Period LEV Low-Emission Vehicle
LID Low Impact Development
LOS Level of Service
LRA Local Responsibility Area
LSAA Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement
LST Localized Significant Threshold
LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tank
mBTUyr One million British thermal units
MERV Maximum Efficiency Rating Value
MGD Million Gallons Per Day
MMT Million Metric Ton
MND Mitigated Negative Declaration
MPO Metropolitan Planning Organization
MRF Material Recovery Facility
MRZ Mineral Resource Zone
MS4 Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System
MT Metric Ton
MTCO2e Metric Ton CO2 Equivalents
MUOD Mixed-Use Overlay District
MWD Metropolitan Water District of Southern California
mWH/yr Megawatt-hours
NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards
NAHC Native American Heritage Commission
ND Negative Declaration
NF3 Nitrogen Trifluoride
NOX Oxides of Nitrogen
NO2 Nitrogen Dioxide
N2O Nitrous Oxide
NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
NWI National Wetlands Inventory
O3 Ozone
OEHHA Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment
OPR Office of Planning and Research
Section 5 List of Preparers and Acronyms
5.2 Acronyms
City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 5-5 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022 Acronym/Abbreviation Definition
OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration
PCBs Polychlorinated Biphenyls
PCD Planned Community Development
PFCs Perfluorocarbons
PHEV Plug-In Hybrid Vehicle
PM Particulate Matter
PM2.5 Particulate matter, aerodynamic diameter of 2.5 micrometers or less PM10 Particulate matter, aerodynamic diameter of 10 micrometers or less PPM Parts per million
PPV Peak Particle Velocity
Qa Quaternary Alluvium
RHNA Regional Housing Needs Assessment
RPS Renewables Portfolio Standards
RWQCB Regional Water Quality Control Board
RTP Regional Transportation Plan
SB Senate Bill
SCAB South Coast Air Basin
SCAG Southern California Association of Governments
SCAQMD South Coast Air Quality Management District
SCCIC South Central Coast Information Center
SCE Southern California Edison
SCS Sustainable Communities Strategy
SEAs Sensitive Ecological Areas
SEER Seasonal Energy Efficiency Radio
SF6 Sulfur Hexafluoride
SGMP Soil and Groundwater Management Plan
SGVCOG San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments
SJCWRP San Jose Creek Water Reclamation Plant
SLCP Short-Lived Climate Pollutant
SLF Sacred Lands File
SoCalGas Southern California Gas
SOX Sulfur Oxides
SOON Surplus Off-Road for NOx
SORE Small Off-Road Equipment
SR- State Route
STC Sound Transmission Class
SWPPP Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
SWRCB State Water Resources Control Board
T-BACTs That Best Available Control Technologies for Toxics TACs Toxic Air Contaminants
Section 5 List of Preparers and Acronyms
5.2 Acronyms
City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 5-6 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022 Acronym/Abbreviation Definition
TC-C Town Center Commercial
TCSP Town Center Specific Plan
TDM Transportation Demand Management
TeNS Technical Noise Supplement
TPD Tons per day
USACE U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
USDOT U.S. Department of Transportation
USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency
USFWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
UWMP Urban Water Management Plan
VdB Vibratory Decibel
VHFHSZ Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone
VMT Vehicle Miles Traveled
VOC Volatile Organic Compounds
WDR Waste Discharge Requirement
ZEV Zero-Emission Vehicle
City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 6-1 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022 SECTION 6
Introduction to the Response to Comments
The Response to Comments was prepared to respond to comments that were received on the Public Review Draft IS/MND. The Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (Final IS/MND) consists of the Public Review Draft IS/MND and the Response to Comments (Section 6, Introduction to the Response to Comments, and Section 7, Commenters and Response to Comments). The Final IS/MND has been prepared in accordance with CEQA as amended (Public Resources Code Sec. 21000 et seq.) and CEQA Guidelines (California Administrative Code Section 15000 et seq.). Documents relating to this Final IS/MND were cited and incorporated. All documents are available for review at the City of Covina Planning Division located at 125 E.
College Street, Covina, California 91723, and at https://www.covinaca.gov/pc/page/mixed-useoverlay-district.
6.1 CEQA Requirements
Before the City may approve the Project, it must certify that the Final IS/MND: a) has been completed in compliance with CEQA; b) was presented to the City Council who reviewed and considered it prior to approval of the Project; and c) reflects the City’s independent judgement and analysis (CEQA Guidelines Sec. 15074(b)).
CEQA Guidelines Sec. 15074 states that prior to approving a project, the decision-making body of the lead agency shall consider the proposed mitigated negative declaration together with any comments received during the public review process. Therefore, the decision-making body will be considering the following documents that constitute the Final IS/MND prior to making a decision on the Project:
• The Public Review Draft IS/MND;
• The Response to Comments which includes:
– Comments and recommendations received on the Public Review Draft IS/MND; – A list of persons, organizations, and public agencies commenting on the Public Review Draft IS/MND; and
– The response of the Lead Agency to significant environmental points raised in the review and consultation process.
The Response to Comments for the Project presents the following sections:
• Section 6: Introduction to the Response to Comments – this section includes an introduction to the Response to Comments and the CEQA process and requirements; and
Section 6 Introduction to the Response to Comments
6.2 CEQA Process
City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 6-2 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022 • Section 7: Commenters and Response to Comments – this section the persons, organizations, and public agencies commenting on the Public Review Draft IS/MND; the written comments received on the Public Review Draft IS/MND; and the written responses to each comment identified.
An Errata was not included in the Response to Comments as there were no revisions made to the Public Review Draft IS/MND in response to comments received or initiated by the Lead Agency.
6.2 CEQA Process
6.2.1 Public Participation Process
Notice of Intent of the Public Review Draft IS/MND
The Notice of Intent (NOI) of the Public Review Draft IS/MND was posted on Thursday, June 9, 2022, with the City Clerk and the State Clearinghouse. The Public Review Draft IS/MND was circulated for a 30-day public review until July 8, 2022. A 30-day public review period was provided in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Sec. 15105(b). The Public Review Draft IS/MND was circulated to state and local agencies and interested parties requesting a copy of the Public Review Draft IS/MND. The Public Review Draft IS/MND was made available to the public at the City of Covina Planning Division located at 125 E. College Street, Covina, California 91723 and at https://www.covinaca.gov/pc/page/mixed-use-overlay-district.
6.2.2 Evaluation and Response to Comments
In accordance with Article 6 of the CEQA Guidelines, the City of Covina, as the Lead Agency, was required to evaluate substantive environmental comments received on the Public Review Draft IS/MND. The Response to Comments provides written responses to each comment received on the Public Review Draft IS/MND.
6.2.3 Final IS/MND Approval
As Lead Agency, the City is required to determine the adequacy of the Final IS/MND (Public Review Draft IS/MND and Response to Comments). The City can adopt the Final IS/MND if they find on the basis of the whole record before it (including the Public Review Draft IS/MND and Response to Comments) that there is no substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment and that the Final IS/MND reflects the City’s independent judgment and analysis.
6.2.4 Notice of Determination
Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sec. 15094, the City will file a Notice of Determination (NOD) with the City Clerk and the Office of Planning and Research, State Clearinghouse, within five working days of project approval.
6.3 Summary of Response to Comments Findings
As discussed above, an Errata was not included in the Response to Comments as there were no revisions made to the Public Review Draft IS/MND in response to comments received or initiated
Section 6 Introduction to the Response to Comments
6.3 Summary of Response to Comments Findings
City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 6-3 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022 by the Lead Agency. CEQA Guidelines Sec. 15073.5 makes clear a IS/MND needs to be recirculated if the IS/MND was substantially revised after the public notice of availability of the MND. CEQA Sec. 15073.5(b) states that a substantial revision means:
• A new, avoidable significant effect is identified and mitigation measures or project revisions must be added in order to reduce the effect to insignificance, or • The lead agency determines that the proposed mitigation measures or project revisions will not reduce potential effects to less than significant and new measures or revisions must be required.
As set forth in more detail in the Response to Comments, none of the responses set forth herein change the significance conclusions presented in the Public Review Draft IS/MND or substantially alters the analysis presented for public review. Furthermore, the Public Review Draft IS/MND circulated for public review was fully adequate under CEQA such that meaningful public review was not precluded. Thus, the clarifications provided in the Response to Comments does not constitute significant new information that might trigger recirculation.
Section 6 Introduction to the Response to Comments
6.3 Summary of Response to Comments Findings
City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 6-4 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022
INTENTIONALLY BLANK
City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 7-1 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022 SECTION 7
Commenters and Response to Comments
The Public Review Draft IS/MND for the Project was circulated for public review for 30 days (June 9, 2022, through July 8, 2022). The City received one comment letter from the County of Los Angeles Fire Department, dated July 1, 2022. The comment letter was assigned an alphabetical designation (A). Each comment within the letter was assigned a numerical designation so that each comment could be cross-referenced with an individual response.
Following is the comment letter and written responses to each of the comments that were received during the public review period of the Public Review Draft IS/MND.
Section 7 Commenters and Response to Comments
7.1 Comment Letter A: County of Los Angeles Fire Department – July 1, 2022 City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 7-2 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022
7.1 Comment Letter A: County of Los Angeles Fire
Department – July 1, 2022
Section 7 Commenters and Response to Comments
7.1 Comment Letter A: County of Los Angeles Fire Department – July 1, 2022 City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 7-3 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022 Comment Letter A: County of Los Angeles Fire Department – July 1, 2022
Section 7 Commenters and Response to Comments
7.1 Comment Letter A: County of Los Angeles Fire Department – July 1, 2022 City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 7-4 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022 Comment Letter A: County of Los Angeles Fire Department – July 1, 2022
Section 7 Commenters and Response to Comments
7.1 Comment Letter A: County of Los Angeles Fire Department – July 1, 2022 City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 7-5 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022 Comment Letter A: County of Los Angeles Fire Department – July 1, 2022
Section 7 Commenters and Response to Comments
7.1 Comment Letter A: County of Los Angeles Fire Department – July 1, 2022 City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 7-6 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022
7.1.1 Response to Comment Letter A: County of Los
Angeles Fire Department – July 1, 2022
Response to Comment A-1
The comment states the Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been reviewed by the Planning Division, Land Development Unit, Forestry Division, and Health Hazardous Materials Division of the County of Los Angeles Fire Department. The comment is noted and saved in the project record. No response is required because there are no specific comments on the contents of the Public Review IS/MND.
Response to Comment A-2
The Planning Division has no comments. The comment is noted and saved in the project record.
No response is required because there are no specific comments on the contents of the Public Review IS/MND.
Response to Comment A-3
The comment states that Land Development Unit comments are only preliminary requirements.
Specific fire and life safety requirements will be addressed during the review for building and fire plan check phases. Once the official plans are submitted for review there may be additional requirements. The comment states the development of this project must comply with all applicable code and ordinance requirements for construction, access, water mains, fire flows and fire hydrants. Future development and redevelopment associated with the Project would comply with all applicable code and ordinance requirements of the County of Los Angeles Fire Department as stated in Section XV, Public Services.
Response to Comment A-4
The comment provides 12 access requirements. Future development and redevelopment associated with the Project would comply with all access requirements of the County of Los Angeles Fire Department as stated in Section XV, Public Services.
Response to Comment A-5
The comment provides 5 water system requirements. Future development and redevelopment associated with the Project would comply with all water systems requirements of the County of Los Angeles Fire Department as stated in Section XV, Public Services.
Response to Comment A-6
The comment states the statutory responsibilities of the Forestry Division include erosion control, watershed management, rare and endangered species, brush clearance, vegetation management, fuel modification for Fire Hazard Severity Zones, archaeological and cultural resources, and the County Oak Tree Ordinance. No response is required because there are no specific comments on the contents of the Public Review IS/MND.
Section 7 Commenters and Response to Comments
7.1 Comment Letter A: County of Los Angeles Fire Department – July 1, 2022 City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 7-7 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022 Response to Comment A-7
The Health Hazardous Materials Division has no comments or requirements for the Project at this time. No response is required because there are no specific comments on the contents of the Public Review IS/MND.
Section 7 Commenters and Response to Comments
7.1 Comment Letter A: County of Los Angeles Fire Department – July 1, 2022 City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project 7-8 ESA / D202100759.01 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 2022
INTENTIONALLY BLANK
Appendix A
Air Quality, Energy and
Greenhouse Gases
Appendix A. Air Quality, Energy and Greenhouse Gases
A-1 Air Quality Emissions
Assumptions and
Modeling
CalEEMod Inputs (Non-Default information only)
Project Location
County Los Angeles
Air District South Coast
Climate Zone 9
Construction Year 2022
Operational Year 2024
Utility Provider Southern California Edison
Note: 10% of construction occuring at any time assumed.
Land Use
SF/ DU/
Seat/ Room
/Spaces KSF Acres
Residential 4.49
Residential 136 3.49
Parking garage 272 1.00 Parking underground structure
Commercial/Industrial 2.99
Recreational 81,000 81.000 1.495
Industrial 49,000 49.000 1.495
Note:
General Construction Notes:
1 Construction schedule based on CalEEMod defaults.
2 Assuming 2 parking spots per dwelling unit.
3 Assuming no parking associated with non-residential land uses to capture most construction and operational emissions. 4 CalEEMod limits size of general light industry to < 50,000 sq ft; rest of 130 ksf split into commercial 5 High turnover restaurant land use expected to produce worst-case operational emissions; 6 VOC Painting for Parking/Roadways.
7 Assuming no offroad equipment mitigation at this time General Operations Notes:
1 Only natural gas fireplaces
2 Low-VOC painting for architectural coatings.
3 Not assuming any generators or other stationary equipment at this time. 4 Not assuming any electrify landscape equipment at this time. 5 Residential VMT from Traffic Report, non-residential VMT from CalEEMod 6 Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers, provided the Transportation Assessment Report Covina Mixed-Use Overlay District , dated March 3, 2022. 7 Total project-related trips from residential land-uses were provided, and were reported as 6174 trips per day. 8 6174 trips per day corresponds to Residential Work Trip / Size / Day of 4.54 for input into CalEEMod.
Demolition
Debris Amounts Acres Sq Ft CY
Construction Area 7.48 325830
Building (25%) 81458 9051
Hardscape (75%) 244373 4525
13576
Density of Asphalt or Concrete
Debris (ref 1) (lb/CY) 2400
Debris Weight (ton) - PROJECT 16292
City of Covina Mixed Use Overlay District (MUOD)
Construction and Operational Assumptions
CalEEMod Land Use Type
Mid-rise Apartment
High Turnover Restaurant
General Light Industry
- - >-- - >--- - >-- - >--- - >-- - >--
Truck Trip Calculations
Truck Size (CY) 10
Round Truck Trip Counts 1,358
Total 1-Way Truck Trip Counts 2,715
Construction Days 20
Truck Trips/Day 136
Demolition Notes:
1 Assuming 25% of acreage contains a 1-story building.
2 Assuming 12 foot building height and 25% of total construction area square footage due to empty space in buidings. 3 Assuming 1/2 foot thickness for hardscape.
4 Truck size of 10 CY assuming void space for construction debris. 5 Construction days from the demolition phase in CalEEmod file.
References:
1 Density of Asphalt and Concrete Debris , 2400 lb/CY (1.2 ton/CY) https://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/swfacilities/cdi/tools/calculations Material Export
Square Footage per Parking Space1 400
# of Underground Parking Spaces 272
Parking Area (Sq Ft) 108800
Soil Export (CY)1 48356
Truck Size (CY) 14
Round Truck Trip Counts 3454
Total 1-Way Truck Trip Counts 6908
Construction Days 10
Truck Trips/Day 691
Material Export Notes:
1 It is assumed underground parking activities will occur and require material export. 2 However, it is assume that no material import will be necessary. 3 Square footage per parking space is an assumption used in CalEEMod. 4 Soil export assumes a 12-foot excavation height.
5 Construction days from the site prep phase in CalEEmod file.
Regional Emissions Calculations
Pollutant VOC NOx CO SOx PM10 PM2.5
Construction Emissions - 10% Buildout Scenario
Project Emissions (lb/day) 104.6 140.9 46.1 0.5 22.7 9.7 Significance Threshold (lb/day) 75 100 550 150 150 55
Exceed? YES YES no no no no
Operation Emissions
10% Buildout Scenario
Area 6.4424 2.05 12.1 0.01 0.22 0.22
Energy 0.6297 5.70 4.60 0.03 0.44 0.44
Mobile 26.3376 21.8 198 0.39 40.2 10.9
Project Emissions (lb/day) 33.4096 29.6 214 0.44 40.9 11.6 Total Project Buildout Scenario
Area 64.42 20.47 120.7 0.13 2.17 2.17
Energy 6.30 56.96 45.99 0.34 4.35 4.35
Mobile 263.4 218.4 1976.6 3.9 402.0 109.1
Total Project Buildout Emissions (lb/day) 334.1 295.8 2143.3 4.4 408.6 115.6 Significance Threshold (lb/day) 55 55 550 150 150 55
Exceed? YES YES YES no YES YES
Optimized Project Buildout Scenario
Maximum Allowable Percent Buildout of Total (%) 15% 15% 25% 100% 35% 45% Total Project Buildout Emissions (lb/day) 50.1 44.4 535.8 4.4 143.0 52.0 Significance Threshold (lb/day) 55 55 550 150 150 55
Exceed? no no no no no no
City of Covina Mixed Use Overlay District (MUOD)
Emissions Summary
-----
0.0000 49,729.424
7 49,729.424
7 3.6602 7.2843 51,991.639
4 Maximum 104.6366 140.9068 46.1423 0.4580 32.4884 2.5150 35.0033 13.5507 2.3469 15.8976 2023 104.6366 16.7696 23.9800 0.0562 2.5589 0.7236 3.2826 0.6865 0.6808 1.3673 0.0000 5,597.7352 5,597.7352 0.7176 0.1980 5,674.0125
0.0000 49,729.424
7 49,729.424
7 3.6602 7.2843 51,991.639
4 2022 6.1510 140.9068 46.1423 0.4580 32.4884 2.5150 35.0033 13.5507 2.3469 15.8976 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2
2.0 Emissions Summary
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 4.09 4.54
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 5.44 4.54
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 6,045.00 6,908.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 4.91 4.54
tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 48,356.00
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 1,611.00 2,715.00
tblAreaMitigation UseLowVOCPaintParkingCheck False True tblFireplaces NumberWood 6.80 0.00
Vehicle Trips - Residential trips provided from traffic study. Light Industrial and Commercial trips used CalEEMod defaults.
Woodstoves - No wood fireplaces permitted.
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation -
Area Mitigation -
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
Project Characteristics -
Land Use -
Trips and VMT - Trips conservatively calculated outside of CalEEMod. Haul truck trip numbers conservatively assuming 10 CY for demo and 14 CY site prep. The remaining construction trips are CalEEMod defaults Demolition - Grading -
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
390.98 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.033 N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.004
31 Climate Zone 9 Operational Year 2024
Utility Company Southern California Edison
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) Apartments Mid Rise 136.00 Dwelling Unit 3.58 136,000.00 389 Enclosed Parking Structure 272.00 Space 2.45 108,800.00 0 General Light Industry 49.00 1000sqft 1.12 49,000.00 0
High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 81.00 1000sqft 1.86 81,000.00 0 South Coast AQMD Air District, Summer
1.0 Project Characteristics
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 3/29/2022 2:14 PM
City of Covina MUOD Construction - South Coast AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied City of Covina MUOD Construction
I I I I
3 Grading Grading 5/13/2022 6/9/2022 5 20
20 2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 4/29/2022 5/12/2022 5 10 End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 4/1/2022 4/28/2022 5
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date
0.00 85.16 11.75 0.00 85.44 31.99 100.00 0.00 1.59 53.53 0.00 1.74 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
9.90 1.81 13.46 19.92
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Bio- CO2
PM10
Total 33.4096 29.579 214.3346 0.4373 39.9088 0.9476 40.8563 10.6349 0.9267 11.5616 0 49,777.25 49,777.25 3.2577 2.1349 50,494.88 Mobile 26.3376 21.8355 197.6632 0.3901 39.9088 0.2951 40.2039 10.6349 0.2743 10.9091 40,439.07 40,439.07 3.0595 1.9641 41,100.84 Energy 0.6297 5.6963 4.5989 0.0344 0.4351 0.4351 0.4351 0.4351 6,869.89 6,869.89 0.1317 0.126 6,910.71 Area 6.4424 2.0472 12.0724 0.0128 0.2174 0.2174 0.2174 0.2174 0 2,468.29 2,468.29 0.0665 0.0449 2,483.33 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
802.6228 49,777.247
2 50,579.870
1 7.0098 2.1349 51,391.309
1 Total 37.0802 30.1228 247.6684 0.5460 39.9088 6.3854 46.2941 10.6349 6.3645 16.9994 40,439.068
6 40,439.068
6 3.0595 1.9641 41,100.843
2 Mobile 26.3376 21.8355 197.6632 0.3901 39.9088 0.2951 40.2039 10.6349 0.2743 10.9091 Energy 0.6297 5.6963 4.5989 0.0344 0.4351 0.4351 0.4351 0.4351 6,869.8876 6,869.8876 0.1317 0.1260 6,910.7119 Area 10.1129 2.5910 45.4063 0.1216 5.6552 5.6552 5.6552 5.6552 802.6228 2,468.2911 3,270.9139 3.8186 0.0449 3,379.7540 Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
2.2 Overall Operational
Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
35.16 0.00 32.19 43.64 0.00 35.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Bio- CO2
PM10
0.00 Maximum 104.6366 140.9068 46.1423 0.458 20.164 2.515 22.679 7.3377 2.3469 9.6846 0 49,729.42 49,729.42 3.6602 7.2843 51,991.64 2023 104.6366 16.7696 23.98 0.0562 2.5589 0.7236 3.2826 0.6865 0.6808 1.3673 0 5,597.74 5,597.74 0.7176 0.198 5,674.01 2022 6.151 140.9068 46.1423 0.458 20.164 2.515 22.679 7.3377 2.3469 9.6846 0 49,729.42 49,729.42 3.6602 7.2843 51,991.64 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I
I
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I ! I I I
1.2427 18.6743
1.1553
0.0000 0.0000
1.0524 3,773.0920
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
Total 2.6392 25.7194 20.5941 0.0388 17.4316 2.6393 1.1553 3.7946 3,746.7812 3,746.7812 Off-Road 2.6392 25.7194 20.5941
0.0000 17.4316 2.6393 0.0000 2.6393
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 17.4316
0.0388 1.2427 1.2427 1.1553 3,746.7812 3,746.7812 1.0524 3,773.0920 Fugitive Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Water Exposed Area
3.2 Demolition - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2
14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Architectural Coating 1 40.00 0.00 0.00
Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70
14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Building Construction 9 198.00 54.00 0.00
Grading 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70
14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 6,908.00
Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 2,715.00 14.70
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40
Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38
Load Factor
Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 15
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 20
Acres of Paving: 2.45
Residential Indoor: 275,400; Residential Outdoor: 91,800; Non-Residential Indoor: 195,000; Non-Residential Outdoor: 65,000; Striped Parking Area:
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power 20 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 5/26/2023 6/22/2023 5 20 5 Paving Paving 4/28/2023 5/25/2023 5
4 Building Construction Building Construction 6/10/2022 4/27/2023 5 230 I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
Total 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 20.2039 1.6126 21.8164 10.1853 1.4836 11.6688 3,686.0619 3,686.0619 1.1922 3,715.8655 Off-Road 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 1.6126 1.6126 1.4836 1.4836 3,686.0619 3,686.0619 1.1922 3,715.8655 Fugitive Dust 20.2039 0.0000 20.2039 10.1853 0.0000 10.1853 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
3.3 Site Preparation - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.6253 21.2163 5.6342 0.0837 2.5422 0.1781 2.7203 0.6953 0.1704 0.8657 9,166.0097 9,166.0097 0.4881 1.4342 9,605.6160 154.3721 154.3721 4.0100e0033.6700e0030.1677 1.0000e- 155.5659 003
0.1687 0.0445 9.2000e004Worker 0.0517 0.0363 0.5726 1.5200e- 0.0454 003
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.5736 21.1799 5.0616 0.0822 2.3745 0.1771 2.5516 0.6509 0.1694 0.8203 9,011.6377 9,011.6377 0.4841 1.4306 9,450.0501 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 2.6392 25.7194 20.5941 0.0388 6.7983 1.2427 8.0410 1.0293 1.1553 2.1846 0.0000 3,746.7812 3,746.7812 1.0524 3,773.0920 Off-Road 2.6392 25.7194 20.5941 0.0388 1.2427 1.2427 1.1553 1.1553 0.0000 3,746.7812 3,746.7812 1.0524 3,773.0920 Fugitive Dust 6.7983 0.0000 6.7983 1.0293 0.0000 1.0293 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.6253 21.2163 5.6342 0.0837 2.5422 0.1781 2.7203 0.6953 0.1704 0.8657 9,166.0097 9,166.0097 0.4881 1.4342 9,605.6160 154.3721 154.3721 4.0100e0033.6700e0030.1677 1.0000e- 155.5659 003
0.1687 0.0445 9.2000e004Worker 0.0517 0.0363 0.5726 1.5200e- 0.0454 003
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
2.3745 0.1771 2.5516 0.6509 0.1694 0.8203 9,011.6377 9,011.6377 0.4841 1.4306 9,450.0501 CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.5736 21.1799 5.0616 0.0822
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O PM10
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 1.9486 20.8551 15.2727 0.0297 7.0826 0.9409 8.0234 3.4247 0.8656 4.2903 2,872.0464 2,872.0464 0.9289 2,895.2684 Off-Road 1.9486 20.8551 15.2727 0.0297 0.9409 0.9409 0.8656 0.8656 2,872.0464 2,872.0464 0.9289 2,895.2684 Fugitive Dust 7.0826 0.0000 7.0826 3.4247 0.0000 3.4247 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
3.4 Grading - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
46,043.362
9 46,043.362
9 2.4681 7.2843 48,275.773
9 Total 2.9809 107.8232 26.4446 0.4199 12.2845 0.9024 13.1869 3.3655 0.8633 4.2288 185.2465 185.2465 4.8100e0034.4000e0030.2012 1.2000e- 186.6790 003
0.2024 0.0534 1.1100e003Worker 0.0620 0.0436 0.6871 1.8200e- 0.0545 003
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 45,858.116
4 45,858.116
4 2.4632 7.2799 48,089.094
9 Hauling 2.9189 107.7796 25.7575 0.4181 12.0833 0.9012 12.9845 3.3121 0.8622 4.1743 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 7.8795 1.6126 9.4921 3.9723 1.4836 5.4558 0.0000 3,686.0619 3,686.0619 1.1922 3,715.8655 Off-Road 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 1.6126 1.6126 1.4836 1.4836 0.0000 3,686.0619 3,686.0619 1.1922 3,715.8655 Fugitive Dust 7.8795 0.0000 7.8795 3.9723 0.0000 3.9723 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
46,043.362
9 46,043.362
9 2.4681 7.2843 48,275.773
9 Total 2.9809 107.8232 26.4446 0.4199 12.2845 0.9024 13.1869 3.3655 0.8633 4.2288 185.2465 185.2465 4.8100e0034.4000e0030.2012 1.2000e- 186.6790 003
0.2024 0.0534 1.1100e003Worker 0.0620 0.0436 0.6871 1.8200e- 0.0545 003
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 45,858.116
4 45,858.116
4 2.4632 7.2799 48,089.094
9 Hauling 2.9189 107.7796 25.7575 0.4181 12.0833 0.9012 12.9845 3.3121 0.8622 4.1743 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I
Worker 0.6819 0.4797 7.5577 0.0200 2.2132 0.0132 2.2264 0.5869 0.0122 0.5991 2,037.7114 2,037.7114 0.0529 0.0484 2,053.4692 Vendor 0.0985 2.5127 0.8615 0.0103 0.3458 0.0263 0.3721 0.0996 0.0251 0.1247 1,110.6145 1,110.6145 0.0372 0.1610 1,159.5276 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.3336 2,554.3336 0.6120 2,569.6322 Off-Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.3336 2,554.3336 0.6120 2,569.6322 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
154.3721 154.3721 4.0100e0033.6700e0030.1677 1.0000e- 155.5659 003
0.1687 0.0445 9.2000e004Total 0.0517 0.0363 0.5726 1.5200e- 0.0454 003
154.3721 154.3721 4.0100e0033.6700e0030.1677 1.0000e- 155.5659 003
0.1687 0.0445 9.2000e004Worker 0.0517 0.0363 0.5726 1.5200e- 0.0454 003
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 1.9486 20.8551 15.2727 0.0297 2.7622 0.9409 3.7031 1.3357 0.8656 2.2012 0.0000 2,872.0464 2,872.0464 0.9289 2,895.2684 Off-Road 1.9486 20.8551 15.2727 0.0297 0.9409 0.9409 0.8656 0.8656 0.0000 2,872.0464 2,872.0464 0.9289 2,895.2684 Fugitive Dust 2.7622 0.0000 2.7622 1.3357 0.0000 1.3357 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
154.3721 154.3721 4.0100e0033.6700e0030.1677 1.0000e- 155.5659 003
0.1687 0.0445 9.2000e004Total 0.0517 0.0363 0.5726 1.5200e- 0.0454 003
154.3721 154.3721 4.0100e0033.6700e0030.1677 1.0000e- 155.5659 003
0.1687 0.0445 9.2000e004Worker 0.0517 0.0363 0.5726 1.5200e- 0.0454 003
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Mitigated Construction On-Site
Total 0.6922 2.3847 7.7360 0.0292 2.5589 0.0239 2.5828 0.6865 0.0224 0.7089 3,042.5253 3,042.5253 0.0831 0.1980 3,103.6064 Worker 0.6325 0.4245 6.9643 0.0194 2.2132 0.0125 2.2256 0.5869 0.0115 0.5984 1,983.9583 1,983.9583 0.0475 0.0448 1,998.4821 Vendor 0.0597 1.9602 0.7717 9.8300e- 0.3458 0.0114 0.3572 0.0996 0.0109 0.1105 1,058.5670 1,058.5670 0.0356 0.1533 1,105.1243 003
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.2099 2,555.2099 0.6079 2,570.4061 Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.2099 2,555.2099 0.6079 2,570.4061 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.7804 2.9924 8.4192 0.0304 2.5590 0.0395 2.5985 0.6865 0.0373 0.7238 3,148.3258 3,148.3258 0.0902 0.2095 3,212.9968 Worker 0.6819 0.4797 7.5577 0.0200 2.2132 0.0132 2.2264 0.5869 0.0122 0.5991 2,037.7114 2,037.7114 0.0529 0.0484 2,053.4692 Vendor 0.0985 2.5127 0.8615 0.0103 0.3458 0.0263 0.3721 0.0996 0.0251 0.1247 1,110.6145 1,110.6145 0.0372 0.1610 1,159.5276 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.3336 2,554.3336 0.6120 2,569.6322 Off-Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.3336 2,554.3336 0.6120 2,569.6322 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.7804 2.9924 8.4192 0.0304 2.5590 0.0395 2.5985 0.6865 0.0373 0.7238 3,148.3258 3,148.3258 0.0902 0.2095 3,212.9968 I
PM10 Total Fugitive Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
150.2999 150.2999 3.6000e0033.3900e0030.1677 9.4000e- 151.4002 004
0.1686 0.0445 8.7000e004Total 0.0479 0.0322 0.5276 1.4700e- 0.0453 003
150.2999 150.2999 3.6000e0033.3900e0030.1677 9.4000e- 151.4002 004
0.1686 0.0445 8.7000e004Worker 0.0479 0.0322 0.5276 1.4700e- 0.0453 003
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.5841 2,207.5841 0.7140 2,225.4336 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.5841 2,207.5841 0.7140 2,225.4336 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
3.6 Paving - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.6922 2.3847 7.7360 0.0292 2.5589 0.0239 2.5828 0.6865 0.0224 0.7089 3,042.5253 3,042.5253 0.0831 0.1980 3,103.6064 Worker 0.6325 0.4245 6.9643 0.0194 2.2132 0.0125 2.2256 0.5869 0.0115 0.5984 1,983.9583 1,983.9583 0.0475 0.0448 1,998.4821 Vendor 0.0597 1.9602 0.7717 9.8300e- 0.3458 0.0114 0.3572 0.0996 0.0109 0.1105 1,058.5670 1,058.5670 0.0356 0.1533 1,105.1243 003
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.2099 2,555.2099 0.6079 2,570.4061 Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.2099 2,555.2099 0.6079 2,570.4061 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
I
Archit. Coating 104.3172 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
400.7997 400.7997 9.5900e0039.0400e0030.4471 2.5200e- 403.7338 003
0.4496 0.1186 2.3200e003Total 0.1278 0.0858 1.4069 3.9200e- 0.1209 003
400.7997 400.7997 9.5900e0039.0400e0030.4471 2.5200e- 403.7338 003
0.4496 0.1186 2.3200e003Worker 0.1278 0.0858 1.4069 3.9200e- 0.1209 003
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 104.5088 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e- 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 003
Off-Road 0.1917 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e- 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 003
Archit. Coating 104.3172 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
150.2999 150.2999 3.6000e0033.3900e0030.1677 9.4000e- 151.4002 004
0.1686 0.0445 8.7000e004Total 0.0479 0.0322 0.5276 1.4700e- 0.0453 003
150.2999 150.2999 3.6000e0033.3900e0030.1677 9.4000e- 151.4002 004
0.1686 0.0445 8.7000e004Worker 0.0479 0.0322 0.5276 1.4700e- 0.0453 003
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 2,207.5841 2,207.5841 0.7140 2,225.4336 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 2,207.5841 2,207.5841 0.7140 2,225.4336 Category lb/day lb/day I I
I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
0.000751 0.003721
5.0 Energy Detail
Historical Energy Use: N
High Turnover (Sit Down 0.006448 0.011958 0.009209 0.000810 0.000503 0.024446 Restaurant)
0.542450 0.061470 0.185138 0.129299 0.023799
0.009209 0.000810 0.000503 0.024446 0.000751 0.003721
0.000751 0.003721
General Light Industry 0.542450 0.061470 0.185138 0.129299 0.023799 0.006448 0.011958 Enclosed Parking Structure 0.542450 0.061470 0.185138 0.129299 0.023799 0.006448 0.011958 0.009209 0.000810 0.000503 0.024446
0.009209 0.000810 0.000503 0.024446 0.000751 0.003721
SBUS MH
Apartments Mid Rise 0.542450 0.061470 0.185138 0.129299 0.023799 0.006448 0.011958 Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY
72.50 19.00 37 20 43
4.4 Fleet Mix
28.00 13.00 92 5 3
High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)
16.60 8.40 6.90 8.50
0.00 0.00 0 0 0
General Light Industry 16.60 8.40 6.90 59.00
19.20 40.60 86 11 3
Enclosed Parking Structure 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00
H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by
Apartments Mid Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20
4.3 Trip Type Information
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W
Total 9,947.06 10,629.35 12,416.28 16,120,299 16,120,299 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 9,086.58 9,914.40 11553.84 13,024,988 13,024,988 General Light Industry 243.04 97.51 245.00 985,425 985,425 Enclosed Parking Structure 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual VMT
Apartments Mid Rise 617.44 617.44 617.44 2,109,886 2,109,886
4.2 Trip Summary Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT
40,439.068
6 40,439.068
6 3.0595 1.9641 41,100.843
2 39.9088 0.2951 40.2039 10.6349 0.2743 10.9091
40,439.068
6 40,439.068
6 3.0595 1.9641 41,100.843
2 Unmitigated 26.3376 21.8355 197.6632 0.3901
Mitigated 26.3376 21.8355 197.6632 0.3901 39.9088 0.2951 40.2039 10.6349 0.2743 10.9091 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
400.7997 400.7997 9.5900e0039.0400e0030.4471 2.5200e- 403.7338 003
0.4496 0.1186 2.3200e003Total 0.1278 0.0858 1.4069 3.9200e- 0.1209 003
400.7997 400.7997 9.5900e0039.0400e0030.4471 2.5200e- 403.7338 003
0.4496 0.1186 2.3200e003Worker 0.1278 0.0858 1.4069 3.9200e- 0.1209 003
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 104.5088 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e- 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 003
Off-Road 0.1917 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e- 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 003 i
I ! ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; I ; ; ; ; ; I
I I I I I I I
I I
I I
l I I I I l I I l l l I I
Use Low VOC Paint - Non-Residential Exterior
Use only Natural Gas Hearths
6,910.7119
6.0 Area Detail
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
Use Low VOC Paint - Residential Interior
Use Low VOC Paint - Residential Exterior
Use Low VOC Paint - Non-Residential Interior
0.0344 0.4351 0.4351 0.4351 0.4351 6,869.8876 6,869.8876 0.1317 0.1260 6,013.4504 0.1153 0.1103 6,049.1854
Total 0.6297 5.6963 4.5989
0.3809 0.3809 0.3809 6,013.4504
285.3407
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
51.1143 0.5512 5.0112 4.2094 0.0301 0.3809
0.0180 283.6551 283.6551 5.4400e0035.2000e0031.4200e0030.0180 0.0180 0.0180
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
General Light
Industry
2.41107 0.0260 0.2364 0.1986
Enclosed Parking 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Structure
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
2.8600e- 0.0363 572.7820 572.7820 0.0110 0.0105
003
0.0363 0.0363 0.0363
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Apartments Mid
Rise
4.86865 0.0525 0.4487 0.1909
Fugitive Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
576.1858
6,910.7119
Mitigated
NaturalGas
Use
ROG NOx CO SO2
0.0344 0.4351 0.4351 0.4351 0.4351 6,869.8876 6,869.8876 0.1317 0.1260 6,013.4504 0.1153 0.1103 6,049.1854
Total 0.6297 5.6963 4.5989
0.3809 0.3809 0.3809 6,013.4504
285.3407
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
51114.3 0.5512 5.0112 4.2094 0.0301 0.3809
0.0180 283.6551 283.6551 5.4400e0035.2000e0031.4200e0030.0180 0.0180 0.0180
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
General Light
Industry
2411.07 0.0260 0.2364 0.1986
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
576.1858
Enclosed Parking
Structure
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
2.8600e- 0.0363 572.7820 572.7820 0.0110 0.0105
003
Apartments Mid 0.0363 0.0363 0.0363
Rise
4868.65 0.0525 0.4487 0.1909
NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Unmitigated
NaturalGas
Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
NaturalGas 0.4351 0.4351 0.4351 0.4351 6,869.8876 6,869.8876 0.1317 0.1260 6,910.7119 Unmitigated
0.6297 5.6963 4.5989 0.0344
0.4351 0.4351 0.4351 0.4351 6,869.8876 6,869.8876 0.1317 0.1260 6,910.7119 CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated
0.6297 5.6963 4.5989 0.0344
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
ROG NOx CO I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
User Defined Equipment
Load Factor Fuel Type
Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power
Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
7.0 Water Detail
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
8.0 Waste Detail
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number
Total 6.4424 2.0472 12.0724 0.0128 0.2174 0.2174 0.2174 0.2174 0.0000 2,468.2911 2,468.2911 0.0665 0.0449 2,483.3287 Landscaping 0.3410 0.1296 11.2564 6.0000e- 0.0623 0.0623 0.0623 0.0623 20.2911 20.2911 0.0196 20.7815 004
Hearth 0.2244 1.9176 0.8160 0.0122 0.1550 0.1550 0.1550 0.1550 0.0000 2,448.0000 2,448.0000 0.0469 0.0449 2,462.5472 Consumer 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Products
5.3053
Architectural 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating
0.5716
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 10.1129 2.5910 45.4063 0.1216 5.6552 5.6552 5.6552 5.6552 802.6228 2,468.2911 3,270.9139 3.8186 0.0449 3,379.7540 Landscaping 0.3410 0.1296 11.2564 6.0000e- 0.0623 0.0623 0.0623 0.0623 20.2911 20.2911 0.0196 20.7815 004
Hearth 3.8949 2.4614 34.1499 0.1210 5.5929 5.5929 5.5929 5.5929 802.6228 2,448.0000 3,250.6228 3.7990 0.0449 3,358.9725 Consumer 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Products
5.3053
Architectural 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating
0.5716
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
6.2 Area by SubCategory
Unmitigated
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Unmitigated 10.1129 2.5910 45.4063 0.1216 5.6552 5.6552 5.6552 5.6552 802.6228 2,468.2911 3,270.9139 3.8186 0.0449 3,379.7540 Mitigated 6.4424 2.0472 12.0724 0.0128 0.2174 0.2174 0.2174 0.2174 0.0000 2,468.2911 2,468.2911 0.0665 0.0449 2,483.3287 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I
I
I
I
I
Equipment Type Number
11.0 Vegetation
0.0000 49,735.545
3 49,735.545
3 3.6559 7.2874 51,998.580
9 Maximum 104.6437 145.6467 46.5607 0.4580 32.4884 2.5166 35.0050 13.5507 2.3485 15.8992 2023 104.6437 16.9065 23.3431 0.0551 2.5589 0.7237 3.2826 0.6865 0.6809 1.3674 0.0000 5,484.5118 5,484.5118 0.7176 0.2011 5,561.7331
0.0000 49,735.545
3 49,735.545
3 3.6559 7.2874 51,998.580
9 2022 6.0735 145.6467 46.5607 0.4580 32.4884 2.5166 35.0050 13.5507 2.3485 15.8992 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2
2.0 Emissions Summary
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 4.09 4.54
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 5.44 4.54
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 6,045.00 6,908.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 4.91 4.54
tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 48,356.00
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 1,611.00 2,715.00
tblAreaMitigation UseLowVOCPaintParkingCheck False True tblFireplaces NumberWood 6.80 0.00
Vehicle Trips - Residential trips provided from traffic study. Light Industrial and Commercial trips used CalEEMod defaults.
Woodstoves - No wood fireplaces permitted.
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation -
Area Mitigation -
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
Project Characteristics -
Land Use -
Trips and VMT - Trips conservatively calculated outside of CalEEMod. Haul truck trip numbers conservatively assuming 10 CY for demo and 14 CY site prep. The remaining construction trips are CalEEMod defaults Demolition - Grading -
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
390.98 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.033 N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.004
31 Climate Zone 9 Operational Year 2024
Utility Company Southern California Edison
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) Apartments Mid Rise 136.00 Dwelling Unit 3.58 136,000.00 389 Enclosed Parking Structure 272.00 Space 2.45 108,800.00 0 General Light Industry 49.00 1000sqft 1.12 49,000.00 0
High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 81.00 1000sqft 1.86 81,000.00 0 South Coast AQMD Air District, Winter
1.0 Project Characteristics
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 3/29/2022 2:13 PM
City of Covina MUOD Construction - South Coast AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied City of Covina MUOD Construction
I I I I
3 Grading Grading 5/13/2022 6/9/2022 5 20
20 2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 4/29/2022 5/12/2022 5 10 End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 4/1/2022 4/28/2022 5
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date
0.00 85.16 11.75 0.00 85.44 31.99 100.00 0.00 1.65 52.32 0.00 1.81 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
10.28 1.71 13.48 20.58
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Bio- CO2
PM10
0.0000 47,960.169
4 47,960.169
4 3.4190 2.2180 48,706.614
6 Total 32.0393 31.2097 214.0103 0.4197 39.9088 0.9478 40.8566 10.6349 0.9270 11.5618 38,621.990
7 38,621.990
7 3.2208 2.0472 39,312.574
1 Mobile 24.9672 23.4662 197.3390 0.3725 39.9088 0.2954 40.2042 10.6349 0.2745 10.9094 Energy 0.6297 5.6963 4.5989 0.0344 0.4351 0.4351 0.4351 0.4351 6,869.8876 6,869.8876 0.1317 0.1260 6,910.7119 Area 6.4424 2.0472 12.0724 0.0128 0.2174 0.2174 0.2174 0.2174 0.0000 2,468.2911 2,468.2911 0.0665 0.0449 2,483.3287 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
802.6228 47,960.169
4 48,762.792
2 7.1711 2.2180 49,603.039
9 Total 35.7099 31.7535 247.3442 0.5284 39.9088 6.3857 46.2944 10.6349 6.3648 16.9997 38,621.990
7 38,621.990
7 3.2208 2.0472 39,312.574
1 Mobile 24.9672 23.4662 197.3390 0.3725 39.9088 0.2954 40.2042 10.6349 0.2745 10.9094 Energy 0.6297 5.6963 4.5989 0.0344 0.4351 0.4351 0.4351 0.4351 6,869.8876 6,869.8876 0.1317 0.1260 6,910.7119 Area 10.1129 2.5910 45.4063 0.1216 5.6552 5.6552 5.6552 5.6552 802.6228 2,468.2911 3,270.9139 3.8186 0.0449 3,379.7540 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
2.2 Overall Operational
Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
35.16 0.00 32.19 43.64 0.00 35.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Bio- CO2
PM10
0.0000 49,735.545
3 49,735.545
3 3.6559 7.2874 51,998.580
9 Maximum 104.6437 145.6467 46.5607 0.4580 20.1640 2.5166 22.6806 7.3377 2.3485 9.6862 2023 104.6437 16.9065 23.3431 0.0551 2.5589 0.7237 3.2826 0.6865 0.6809 1.3674 0.0000 5,484.5118 5,484.5118 0.7176 0.2011 5,561.7331
0.0000 49,735.545
3 49,735.545
3 3.6559 7.2874 51,998.580
9 2022 6.0735 145.6467 46.5607 0.4580 20.1640 2.5166 22.6806 7.3377 2.3485 9.6862 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I
I
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I ! I I I
1.0524 3,773.0920
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
2.6393 1.1553 3.7946 3,746.7812 3,746.7812
3,773.0920
Total 2.6392 25.7194 20.5941 0.0388 17.4316 1.2427 18.6743
0.0388 1.2427 1.2427 1.1553 1.1553 3,746.7812 3,746.7812 1.0524
0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 2.6392 25.7194 20.5941
0.0000 17.4316 2.6393 0.0000 2.6393
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 17.4316
Fugitive Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Water Exposed Area
3.2 Demolition - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2
14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Architectural Coating 1 40.00 0.00 0.00
Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70
14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Building Construction 9 198.00 54.00 0.00
Grading 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70
14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 6,908.00
Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 2,715.00 14.70
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40
Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38
Load Factor
Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 15
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 20
Acres of Paving: 2.45
Residential Indoor: 275,400; Residential Outdoor: 91,800; Non-Residential Indoor: 195,000; Non-Residential Outdoor: 65,000; Striped Parking Area:
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power 20 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 5/26/2023 6/22/2023 5 20 5 Paving Paving 4/28/2023 5/25/2023 5
4 Building Construction Building Construction 6/10/2022 4/27/2023 5 230 I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
Total 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 20.2039 1.6126 21.8164 10.1853 1.4836 11.6688 3,686.0619 3,686.0619 1.1922 3,715.8655 Off-Road 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 1.6126 1.6126 1.4836 1.4836 3,686.0619 3,686.0619 1.1922 3,715.8655 Fugitive Dust 20.2039 0.0000 20.2039 10.1853 0.0000 10.1853 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
3.3 Site Preparation - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.6121 22.1503 5.6744 0.0836 2.5422 0.1784 2.7206 0.6953 0.1707 0.8660 9,160.3530 9,160.3530 0.4873 1.4350 9,600.1725 145.3958 145.3958 4.0600e0033.8900e0030.1677 1.0000e- 146.6576 003
0.1687 0.0445 9.2000e004Worker 0.0544 0.0398 0.5176 1.4300e- 0.0454 003
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.5577 22.1106 5.1568 0.0822 2.3745 0.1774 2.5519 0.6509 0.1697 0.8206 9,014.9572 9,014.9572 0.4832 1.4311 9,453.5149 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 2.6392 25.7194 20.5941 0.0388 6.7983 1.2427 8.0410 1.0293 1.1553 2.1846 0.0000 3,746.7812 3,746.7812 1.0524 3,773.0920 Off-Road 2.6392 25.7194 20.5941 0.0388 1.2427 1.2427 1.1553 1.1553 0.0000 3,746.7812 3,746.7812 1.0524 3,773.0920 Fugitive Dust 6.7983 0.0000 6.7983 1.0293 0.0000 1.0293 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.6121 22.1503 5.6744 0.0836 2.5422 0.1784 2.7206 0.6953 0.1707 0.8660 9,160.3530 9,160.3530 0.4873 1.4350 9,600.1725 145.3958 145.3958 4.0600e0033.8900e0030.1677 1.0000e- 146.6576 003
0.1687 0.0445 9.2000e004Worker 0.0544 0.0398 0.5176 1.4300e- 0.0454 003
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
2.3745 0.1774 2.5519 0.6509 0.1697 0.8206 9,014.9572 9,014.9572 0.4832 1.4311 9,453.5149 CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.5577 22.1106 5.1568 0.0822
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 1.9486 20.8551 15.2727 0.0297 7.0826 0.9409 8.0234 3.4247 0.8656 4.2903 2,872.0464 2,872.0464 0.9289 2,895.2684 Off-Road 1.9486 20.8551 15.2727 0.0297 0.9409 0.9409 0.8656 0.8656 2,872.0464 2,872.0464 0.9289 2,895.2684 Fugitive Dust 7.0826 0.0000 7.0826 3.4247 0.0000 3.4247 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
3.4 Grading - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
46,049.483
4 46,049.483
4 2.4638 7.2874 48,282.715
4 Total 2.9034 112.5631 26.8629 0.4200 12.2845 0.9040 13.1885 3.3655 0.8649 4.2304 174.4750 174.4750 4.8700e0034.6700e0030.2012 1.2000e- 175.9891 003
0.2024 0.0534 1.1100e003Worker 0.0652 0.0477 0.6211 1.7200e- 0.0545 003
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 45,875.008
5 45,875.008
5 2.4589 7.2827 48,106.726
3 Hauling 2.8382 112.5154 26.2418 0.4183 12.0833 0.9028 12.9861 3.3121 0.8638 4.1759 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 7.8795 1.6126 9.4921 3.9723 1.4836 5.4558 0.0000 3,686.0619 3,686.0619 1.1922 3,715.8655 Off-Road 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 1.6126 1.6126 1.4836 1.4836 0.0000 3,686.0619 3,686.0619 1.1922 3,715.8655 Fugitive Dust 7.8795 0.0000 7.8795 3.9723 0.0000 3.9723 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
46,049.483
4 46,049.483
4 2.4638 7.2874 48,282.715
4 Total 2.9034 112.5631 26.8629 0.4200 12.2845 0.9040 13.1885 3.3655 0.8649 4.2304 174.4750 174.4750 4.8700e0034.6700e0030.2012 1.2000e- 175.9891 003
0.2024 0.0534 1.1100e003Worker 0.0652 0.0477 0.6211 1.7200e- 0.0545 003
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 45,875.008
5 45,875.008
5 2.4589 7.2827 48,106.726
3 Hauling 2.8382 112.5154 26.2418 0.4183 12.0833 0.9028 12.9861 3.3121 0.8638 4.1759 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I
Worker 0.7174 0.5248 6.8321 0.0189 2.2132 0.0132 2.2264 0.5869 0.0122 0.5991 1,919.2247 1,919.2247 0.0536 0.0514 1,935.8803 Vendor 0.0967 2.6224 0.8925 0.0103 0.3458 0.0264 0.3721 0.0996 0.0252 0.1248 1,111.1705 1,111.1705 0.0371 0.1612 1,160.1428 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.3336 2,554.3336 0.6120 2,569.6322 Off-Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.3336 2,554.3336 0.6120 2,569.6322 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
145.3958 145.3958 4.0600e0033.8900e0030.1677 1.0000e- 146.6576 003
0.1687 0.0445 9.2000e004Total 0.0544 0.0398 0.5176 1.4300e- 0.0454 003
145.3958 145.3958 4.0600e0033.8900e0030.1677 1.0000e- 146.6576 003
0.1687 0.0445 9.2000e004Worker 0.0544 0.0398 0.5176 1.4300e- 0.0454 003
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 1.9486 20.8551 15.2727 0.0297 2.7622 0.9409 3.7031 1.3357 0.8656 2.2012 0.0000 2,872.0464 2,872.0464 0.9289 2,895.2684 Off-Road 1.9486 20.8551 15.2727 0.0297 0.9409 0.9409 0.8656 0.8656 0.0000 2,872.0464 2,872.0464 0.9289 2,895.2684 Fugitive Dust 2.7622 0.0000 2.7622 1.3357 0.0000 1.3357 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
145.3958 145.3958 4.0600e0033.8900e0030.1677 1.0000e- 146.6576 003
0.1687 0.0445 9.2000e004Total 0.0544 0.0398 0.5176 1.4300e- 0.0454 003
145.3958 145.3958 4.0600e0033.8900e0030.1677 1.0000e- 146.6576 003
0.1687 0.0445 9.2000e004Worker 0.0544 0.0398 0.5176 1.4300e- 0.0454 003
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Mitigated Construction On-Site
Total 0.7248 2.5216 7.0991 0.0281 2.5589 0.0239 2.5829 0.6865 0.0225 0.7090 2,929.3019 2,929.3019 0.0836 0.2011 2,991.3270 Worker 0.6677 0.4642 6.3025 0.0183 2.2132 0.0125 2.2256 0.5869 0.0115 0.5984 1,868.8210 1,868.8210 0.0482 0.0475 1,884.1706 Vendor 0.0572 2.0574 0.7966 9.8500e- 0.3458 0.0115 0.3573 0.0996 0.0110 0.1105 1,060.4809 1,060.4809 0.0354 0.1537 1,107.1564 003
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.2099 2,555.2099 0.6079 2,570.4061 Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.2099 2,555.2099 0.6079 2,570.4061 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.8141 3.1472 7.7246 0.0292 2.5590 0.0396 2.5985 0.6865 0.0374 0.7239 3,030.3952 3,030.3952 0.0906 0.2126 3,096.0231 Worker 0.7174 0.5248 6.8321 0.0189 2.2132 0.0132 2.2264 0.5869 0.0122 0.5991 1,919.2247 1,919.2247 0.0536 0.0514 1,935.8803 Vendor 0.0967 2.6224 0.8925 0.0103 0.3458 0.0264 0.3721 0.0996 0.0252 0.1248 1,111.1705 1,111.1705 0.0371 0.1612 1,160.1428 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.3336 2,554.3336 0.6120 2,569.6322 Off-Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.3336 2,554.3336 0.6120 2,569.6322 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.8141 3.1472 7.7246 0.0292 2.5590 0.0396 2.5985 0.6865 0.0374 0.7239 3,030.3952 3,030.3952 0.0906 0.2126 3,096.0231 I
PM10 Total Fugitive Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
141.5774 141.5774 3.6500e0033.6000e0030.1677 9.4000e- 142.7402 004
0.1686 0.0445 8.7000e004Total 0.0506 0.0352 0.4775 1.3800e- 0.0453 003
141.5774 141.5774 3.6500e0033.6000e0030.1677 9.4000e- 142.7402 004
0.1686 0.0445 8.7000e004Worker 0.0506 0.0352 0.4775 1.3800e- 0.0453 003
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.5841 2,207.5841 0.7140 2,225.4336 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.5841 2,207.5841 0.7140 2,225.4336 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
3.6 Paving - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.7248 2.5216 7.0991 0.0281 2.5589 0.0239 2.5829 0.6865 0.0225 0.7090 2,929.3019 2,929.3019 0.0836 0.2011 2,991.3270 Worker 0.6677 0.4642 6.3025 0.0183 2.2132 0.0125 2.2256 0.5869 0.0115 0.5984 1,868.8210 1,868.8210 0.0482 0.0475 1,884.1706 Vendor 0.0572 2.0574 0.7966 9.8500e- 0.3458 0.0115 0.3573 0.0996 0.0110 0.1105 1,060.4809 1,060.4809 0.0354 0.1537 1,107.1564 003
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.2099 2,555.2099 0.6079 2,570.4061 Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.2099 2,555.2099 0.6079 2,570.4061 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
I
Archit. Coating 104.3172 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
377.5396 377.5396 9.7300e0039.5900e0030.4471 2.5200e- 380.6405 003
0.4496 0.1186 2.3200e003Total 0.1349 0.0938 1.2732 3.6900e- 0.1209 003
377.5396 377.5396 9.7300e0039.5900e0030.4471 2.5200e- 380.6405 003
0.4496 0.1186 2.3200e003Worker 0.1349 0.0938 1.2732 3.6900e- 0.1209 003
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 104.5088 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e- 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 003
Off-Road 0.1917 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e- 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 003
Archit. Coating 104.3172 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
141.5774 141.5774 3.6500e0033.6000e0030.1677 9.4000e- 142.7402 004
0.1686 0.0445 8.7000e004Total 0.0506 0.0352 0.4775 1.3800e- 0.0453 003
141.5774 141.5774 3.6500e0033.6000e0030.1677 9.4000e- 142.7402 004
0.1686 0.0445 8.7000e004Worker 0.0506 0.0352 0.4775 1.3800e- 0.0453 003
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 2,207.5841 2,207.5841 0.7140 2,225.4336 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 2,207.5841 2,207.5841 0.7140 2,225.4336 Category lb/day lb/day I I
I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
0.000751 0.003721
5.0 Energy Detail
Historical Energy Use: N
High Turnover (Sit Down 0.006448 0.011958 0.009209 0.000810 0.000503 0.024446 Restaurant)
0.542450 0.061470 0.185138 0.129299 0.023799
0.009209 0.000810 0.000503 0.024446 0.000751 0.003721
0.000751 0.003721
General Light Industry 0.542450 0.061470 0.185138 0.129299 0.023799 0.006448 0.011958 Enclosed Parking Structure 0.542450 0.061470 0.185138 0.129299 0.023799 0.006448 0.011958 0.009209 0.000810 0.000503 0.024446
0.009209 0.000810 0.000503 0.024446 0.000751 0.003721
SBUS MH
Apartments Mid Rise 0.542450 0.061470 0.185138 0.129299 0.023799 0.006448 0.011958 Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY
72.50 19.00 37 20 43
4.4 Fleet Mix
28.00 13.00 92 5 3
High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)
16.60 8.40 6.90 8.50
0.00 0.00 0 0 0
General Light Industry 16.60 8.40 6.90 59.00
19.20 40.60 86 11 3
Enclosed Parking Structure 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00
H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by
Apartments Mid Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20
4.3 Trip Type Information
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W
Total 9,947.06 10,629.35 12,416.28 16,120,299 16,120,299 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 9,086.58 9,914.40 11553.84 13,024,988 13,024,988 General Light Industry 243.04 97.51 245.00 985,425 985,425 Enclosed Parking Structure 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual VMT
Apartments Mid Rise 617.44 617.44 617.44 2,109,886 2,109,886
4.2 Trip Summary Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT
38,621.990
7 38,621.990
7 3.2208 2.0472 39,312.574
1 39.9088 0.2954 40.2042 10.6349 0.2745 10.9094
38,621.990
7 38,621.990
7 3.2208 2.0472 39,312.574
1 Unmitigated 24.9672 23.4662 197.3390 0.3725
Mitigated 24.9672 23.4662 197.3390 0.3725 39.9088 0.2954 40.2042 10.6349 0.2745 10.9094 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
377.5396 377.5396 9.7300e0039.5900e0030.4471 2.5200e- 380.6405 003
0.4496 0.1186 2.3200e003Total 0.1349 0.0938 1.2732 3.6900e- 0.1209 003
377.5396 377.5396 9.7300e0039.5900e0030.4471 2.5200e- 380.6405 003
0.4496 0.1186 2.3200e003Worker 0.1349 0.0938 1.2732 3.6900e- 0.1209 003
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 104.5088 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e- 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 003
Off-Road 0.1917 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e- 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 003 i
I ! ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; I ; ; ; ; ; I
I I I I I I I
I I
I I
l I I I I l I I l l l I I
Use Low VOC Paint - Non-Residential Exterior
Use only Natural Gas Hearths
6,910.7119
6.0 Area Detail
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
Use Low VOC Paint - Residential Interior
Use Low VOC Paint - Residential Exterior
Use Low VOC Paint - Non-Residential Interior
0.0344 0.4351 0.4351 0.4351 0.4351 6,869.8876 6,869.8876 0.1317 0.1260 6,013.4504 0.1153 0.1103 6,049.1854
Total 0.6297 5.6963 4.5989
0.3809 0.3809 0.3809 6,013.4504
285.3407
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
51.1143 0.5512 5.0112 4.2094 0.0301 0.3809
0.0180 283.6551 283.6551 5.4400e0035.2000e0031.4200e0030.0180 0.0180 0.0180
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
General Light
Industry
2.41107 0.0260 0.2364 0.1986
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
576.1858
Enclosed Parking
Structure
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
2.8600e- 0.0363 572.7820 572.7820 0.0110 0.0105
003
0.0363 0.0363 0.0363
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Apartments Mid
Rise
4.86865 0.0525 0.4487 0.1909
Fugitive Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
6,910.7119
Mitigated
NaturalGas
Use
ROG NOx CO SO2
0.0344 0.4351 0.4351 0.4351 0.4351 6,869.8876 6,869.8876 0.1317 0.1260 6,013.4504 0.1153 0.1103 6,049.1854
Total 0.6297 5.6963 4.5989
0.3809 0.3809 0.3809 6,013.4504
285.3407
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
51114.3 0.5512 5.0112 4.2094 0.0301 0.3809
0.0180 283.6551 283.6551 5.4400e0035.2000e0031.4200e0030.0180 0.0180 0.0180
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
General Light
Industry
2411.07 0.0260 0.2364 0.1986
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
576.1858
Enclosed Parking
Structure
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
2.8600e- 0.0363 572.7820 572.7820 0.0110 0.0105
003
Apartments Mid 0.0363 0.0363 0.0363
Rise
4868.65 0.0525 0.4487 0.1909
NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Unmitigated
NaturalGas
Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
NaturalGas 0.4351 0.4351 0.4351 0.4351 6,869.8876 6,869.8876 0.1317 0.1260 6,910.7119 Unmitigated
0.6297 5.6963 4.5989 0.0344
0.4351 0.4351 0.4351 0.4351 6,869.8876 6,869.8876 0.1317 0.1260 6,910.7119 CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated
0.6297 5.6963 4.5989 0.0344
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
ROG NOx CO I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
User Defined Equipment
Load Factor Fuel Type
Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power
Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
7.0 Water Detail
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
8.0 Waste Detail
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number
Total 6.4424 2.0472 12.0724 0.0128 0.2174 0.2174 0.2174 0.2174 0.0000 2,468.2911 2,468.2911 0.0665 0.0449 2,483.3287 Landscaping 0.3410 0.1296 11.2564 6.0000e- 0.0623 0.0623 0.0623 0.0623 20.2911 20.2911 0.0196 20.7815 004
Hearth 0.2244 1.9176 0.8160 0.0122 0.1550 0.1550 0.1550 0.1550 0.0000 2,448.0000 2,448.0000 0.0469 0.0449 2,462.5472 Consumer 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Products
5.3053
Architectural 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating
0.5716
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 10.1129 2.5910 45.4063 0.1216 5.6552 5.6552 5.6552 5.6552 802.6228 2,468.2911 3,270.9139 3.8186 0.0449 3,379.7540 Landscaping 0.3410 0.1296 11.2564 6.0000e- 0.0623 0.0623 0.0623 0.0623 20.2911 20.2911 0.0196 20.7815 004
Hearth 3.8949 2.4614 34.1499 0.1210 5.5929 5.5929 5.5929 5.5929 802.6228 2,448.0000 3,250.6228 3.7990 0.0449 3,358.9725 Consumer 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Products
5.3053
Architectural 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating
0.5716
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
6.2 Area by SubCategory
Unmitigated
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Unmitigated 10.1129 2.5910 45.4063 0.1216 5.6552 5.6552 5.6552 5.6552 802.6228 2,468.2911 3,270.9139 3.8186 0.0449 3,379.7540 Mitigated 6.4424 2.0472 12.0724 0.0128 0.2174 0.2174 0.2174 0.2174 0.0000 2,468.2911 2,468.2911 0.0665 0.0449 2,483.3287 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I
I
I
I
I
Equipment Type Number
11.0 Vegetation
Maximum 1.1516 2.7947 2.4230 7.9400e- 0.6167 0.0982 0.7148 0.1847 0.0920 0.2767 0.0000 741.8276 741.8276 0.0856 0.0602 761.9163 003
0.0000 237.3786 237.3786 0.0331 7.8100e0032023 1.1516 0.8268 1.1692 2.6300e- 0.1116 0.0362 0.1478 0.0300 0.0340 0.0640 240.5326 003
2022 0.2633 2.7947 2.4230 7.9400e- 0.6167 0.0982 0.7148 0.1847 0.0920 0.2767 0.0000 741.8276 741.8276 0.0856 0.0602 761.9163 003
NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2
2.0 Emissions Summary
2.1 Overall Construction
Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 4.09 4.54
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 5.44 4.54
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 6,045.00 6,908.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 4.91 4.54
tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 48,356.00
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 1,611.00 2,715.00
tblAreaMitigation UseLowVOCPaintParkingCheck False True tblFireplaces NumberWood 6.80 0.00
Vehicle Trips - Residential trips provided from traffic study. Light Industrial and Commercial trips used CalEEMod defaults.
Woodstoves - No wood fireplaces permitted.
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation -
Area Mitigation -
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
Project Characteristics -
Land Use -
Trips and VMT - Trips conservatively calculated outside of CalEEMod. Haul truck trip numbers conservatively assuming 10 CY for demo and 14 CY site prep. The remaining construction trips are CalEEMod defaults Demolition -
Grading -
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
390.98 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.033 N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.004
31 Climate Zone 9 Operational Year 2024
Utility Company Southern California Edison
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) Apartments Mid Rise 136.00 Dwelling Unit 3.58 136,000.00 389 Enclosed Parking Structure 272.00 Space 2.45 108,800.00 0 General Light Industry 49.00 1000sqft 1.12 49,000.00 0
High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 81.00 1000sqft 1.86 81,000.00 0 South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual
1.0 Project Characteristics
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 3/29/2022 2:16 PM
City of Covina MUOD Construction - South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied City of Covina MUOD Construction
I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
Total 4.9807 4.7173 32.7994 0.0648 6.0687 0.1347 6.2034 1.6196 0.1315 1.7510 234.902 7,674.56 7,909.46 15.0585 0.3528 8,391.06 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 14.2061 117.5018 131.7079 1.469 0.0357 179.0586 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 220.6958 0 220.6958 13.0428 0 546.7646 Mobile 3.7478 3.6376 30.5429 0.0583 6.0687 0.0456 6.1142 1.6196 0.0423 1.6619 0 5,479.52 5,479.52 0.4454 0.2865 5,576.03 Energy 0.1149 1.0396 0.8393 6.2700e- 0.0794 0.0794 0.0794 0.0794 0 2,047.47 2,047.47 0.0986 0.0302 2,058.93 003
9.7300e- 0 30.0608 30.0608 2.76E-03 5.10E-04 30.2814
003
9.7300e0039.7300e003Area 1.1180 0.0402 1.4173 2.3000e- 9.7300e-003 004
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 5.0266 4.7241 33.2161 0.0661 6.0687 0.2027 6.2713 1.6196 0.1994 1.8190 244.0036 7,674.5593 7,918.5629 15.1011 0.3528 8,401.2260 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 14.2061 117.5018 131.7079 1.4690 0.0357 179.0586 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 220.6958 0.0000 220.6958 13.0428 0.0000 546.7646 Mobile 3.7478 3.6376 30.5429 0.0583 6.0687 0.0456 6.1142 1.6196 0.0423 1.6619 0.0000 5,479.5218 5,479.5218 0.4454 0.2865 5,576.0273 Energy 0.1149 1.0396 0.8393 6.2700e- 0.0794 0.0794 0.0794 0.0794 0.0000 2,047.4749 2,047.4749 0.0986 0.0302 2,058.9288 003
9.1016 30.0608 39.1624 0.0453 5.1000e004Area 1.1639 0.0470 1.8339 1.5900e- 0.0777 0.0777 0.0777 0.0777 40.4467 003
CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total
Highest 1.6244 1.6244
2.2 Overall Operational
4 1-1-2023 3-31-2023 0.6173 0.6173
5 4-1-2023 6-30-2023 1.3568 1.3568
2 7-1-2022 9-30-2022 0.6931 0.6931
3 10-1-2022 12-31-2022 0.6993 0.6993
Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 4-1-2022 6-30-2022 1.6244 1.6244
29.00 0.00 24.48 31.70 0.00 19.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2
PM10
Maximum 1.1516 2.7947 2.4230 7.9400e- 0.4055 0.0982 0.5037 0.1167 0.0920 0.2086 0 741.8273 741.8273 0.0856 0.0602 761.916 003
2023 1.1516 0.8268 1.1692 2.6300e- 0.1116 0.0362 0.1478 0.0300 0.0340 0.0640 0 237.3784 237.3784 0.0331 7.81E-03 240.5324 003
2022 0.2633 2.7947 2.4230 7.9400e- 0.4055 0.0982 0.5037 0.1167 0.0920 0.2086 0 741.8273 741.8273 0.0856 0.0602 761.916 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I
I
I
I
Fugitive Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Water Exposed Area
3.2 Demolition - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2
14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Architectural Coating 1 40.00 0.00 0.00
Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70
14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Building Construction 9 198.00 54.00 0.00
Grading 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70
14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 6,908.00
Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 2,715.00 14.70
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40
Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38
Load Factor
Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 15
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 20
Acres of Paving: 2.45
Residential Indoor: 275,400; Residential Outdoor: 91,800; Non-Residential Indoor: 195,000; Non-Residential Outdoor: 65,000; Striped Parking Area: 6,528
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power 20 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 5/26/2023 6/22/2023 5 20 5 Paving Paving 4/28/2023 5/25/2023 5
20 4 Building Construction Building Construction 6/10/2022 4/27/2023 5 230 3 Grading Grading 5/13/2022 6/9/2022 5
20 2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 4/29/2022 5/12/2022 5 10 End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 4/1/2022 4/28/2022 5
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date
0.00 33.54 1.08 0.00 34.08 3.74 3.73 0.00 0.11 0.28 0.00 0.12 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent Reduction 0.91 0.14 1.25 2.06
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Bio- CO2
PM10
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I
Fugitive Dust 0.1010 0.0000 0.1010 0.0509 0.0000 0.0509 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
3.3 Site Preparation - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 83.1041 83.1041 4.4300e0030.0250 1.7800e- 0.0130 87.0935 003
0.0268 6.8600e0031.7100e003Total 6.1700e- 8.5600e-003 003
0.2235 0.0563 8.3000e004
0.0000 1.3393 1.3393 4.0000e0054.0000e0051.6500e- 1.3509 003
1.0000e0051.6600e0034.4000e0041.0000e005Worker 5.0000e- 4.5000e-004 004
4.1000e0045.3200e0031.0000e005
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 81.7648 81.7648 4.3900e0030.0234 1.7700e- 0.0130 85.7427 003
0.0251 6.4200e0031.7000e003Hauling 5.6700e- 8.1100e-003 003
0.2231 0.0510 8.2000e004
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 33.9902 33.9902 9.5500e003Total 0.0264 0.2572 0.2059 3.9000e- 0.0680 0.0124 0.0804 0.0103 0.0116 0.0218 0.0000 34.2289 004
0.0000 33.9902 33.9902 9.5500e003Off-Road 0.0264 0.2572 0.2059 3.9000e- 0.0124 0.0124 0.0116 0.0116 0.0000 34.2289 004
Fugitive Dust 0.0680 0.0000 0.0680 0.0103 0.0000 0.0103 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 83.1041 83.1041 4.4300e0030.0250 1.7800e- 0.0130 87.0935 003
0.0268 6.8600e0031.7100e003Total 6.1700e- 8.5600e-003 003
0.2235 0.0563 8.3000e004
0.0000 1.3393 1.3393 4.0000e0054.0000e0051.6500e- 1.3509 003
1.0000e0051.6600e0034.4000e0041.0000e005Worker 5.0000e- 4.5000e-004 004
4.1000e0045.3200e0031.0000e005
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0124 0.1868
0.0000 81.7648 81.7648 4.3900e0030.0234 1.7700e- 0.0130 85.7427 003
0.0251 6.4200e0031.7000e0038.1100e-003
CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 5.6700e0030.2231 0.0510 8.2000e004
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O PM10
0.0116
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
9.5500e0030.0000 34.2289
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO
Total 0.0264 0.2572 0.2059 3.9000e- 0.0264 0.0116 0.0379 0.0000 33.9902 33.9902 004
0.1743
Off-Road 0.0264 0.2572 0.2059
0.0000 0.1743 0.0264 0.0000 0.0264 0.0000
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.1743
0.0116 0.0000 33.9902 33.9902 9.5500e- 34.2289
003
3.9000e- 0.0000
004
0.0124 0.0124
I I
I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
0.0000 26.0548 26.0548 8.4300e003
0.0708 9.4100e- 0.0000 26.2654
003
0.0802 0.0343 8.6600e003Total 0.0195 0.2086 0.1527 3.0000e- 0.0429 004
0.0000 26.0548 26.0548 8.4300e0039.4100e- 0.0000 26.2654 003
9.4100e0038.6600e003Off-Road 0.0195 0.2086 0.1527 3.0000e- 8.6600e-003 004
Fugitive Dust 0.0708 0.0000 0.0708 0.0343 0.0000 0.0343 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
3.4 Grading - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0604 4.5200e- 0.0000 208.8446 208.8446 0.0112 0.0331 218.9727 003
0.0650 0.0166 4.3200e003Total 0.0147 0.5679 0.1330 2.1000e- 0.0209 003
0.0000 0.8036 0.8036 2.0000e0052.0000e0059.9000e- 0.8105 004
1.0000e0059.9000e0042.6000e0041.0000e005Worker 3.0000e- 2.7000e-004 004
2.4000e0043.1900e0031.0000e005
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0595 4.5100e- 0.0000 208.0411 208.0411 0.0112 0.0330 218.1622 003
0.0640 0.0163 4.3100e003Hauling 0.0144 0.5677 0.1298 2.0900e- 0.0206 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 16.7197 16.7197 5.4100e0030.0394 8.0600e- 0.0000 16.8549 003
0.0475 0.0199 7.4200e003Total 0.0159 0.1654 0.0985 1.9000e- 0.0273 004
0.0000 16.7197 16.7197 5.4100e0038.0600e- 0.0000 16.8549 003
8.0600e0037.4200e003Off-Road 0.0159 0.1654 0.0985 1.9000e- 7.4200e-003 004
Fugitive Dust 0.0394 0.0000 0.0394 0.0199 0.0000 0.0199 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0604 4.5200e- 0.0000 208.8446 208.8446 0.0112 0.0331 218.9727 003
0.0650 0.0166 4.3200e003Total 0.0147 0.5679 0.1330 2.1000e- 0.0209 003
0.0000 0.8036 0.8036 2.0000e0052.0000e0059.9000e- 0.8105 004
1.0000e0059.9000e0042.6000e0041.0000e005Worker 3.0000e- 2.7000e-004 004
2.4000e0043.1900e0031.0000e005
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0595 4.5100e- 0.0000 208.0411 208.0411 0.0112 0.0330 218.1622 003
0.0640 0.0163 4.3100e003Hauling 0.0144 0.5677 0.1298 2.0900e- 0.0206 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 16.7197 16.7197 5.4100e0030.1010 8.0600e- 0.0000 16.8549 003
0.1091 0.0509 7.4200e003Total 0.0159 0.1654 0.0985 1.9000e- 0.0584 004
0.0000 16.7197 16.7197 5.4100e0038.0600e- 0.0000 16.8549 003
8.0600e0037.4200e003Off-Road 0.0159 0.1654 0.0985 1.9000e- 7.4200e-003 004 I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
Total 0.1246 1.1399 1.1945 1.9700e- 0.0591 0.0591 0.0556 0.0556 0.0000 169.1594 169.1594 0.0405 0.0000 170.1726 003
Off-Road 0.1246 1.1399 1.1945 1.9700e- 0.0591 0.0591 0.0556 0.0556 0.0000 169.1594 169.1594 0.0405 0.0000 170.1726 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 1.3393 1.3393 4.0000e0054.0000e0051.6500e- 1.3509 003
1.0000e0051.6600e0034.4000e0041.0000e005Total 5.0000e- 4.5000e-004 004
4.1000e0045.3200e0031.0000e005
0.0000 1.3393 1.3393 4.0000e0054.0000e0051.6500e- 1.3509 003
1.0000e0051.6600e0034.4000e0041.0000e005Worker 5.0000e- 4.5000e-004 004
4.1000e0045.3200e0031.0000e005
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 26.0547 26.0547 8.4300e0030.0276 9.4100e- 0.0000 26.2654 003
0.0370 0.0134 8.6600e003Total 0.0195 0.2086 0.1527 3.0000e- 0.0220 004
0.0000 26.0547 26.0547 8.4300e0039.4100e- 0.0000 26.2654 003
9.4100e0038.6600e003Off-Road 0.0195 0.2086 0.1527 3.0000e- 8.6600e-003 004
Fugitive Dust 0.0276 0.0000 0.0276 0.0134 0.0000 0.0134 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 1.3393 1.3393 4.0000e0054.0000e0051.6500e- 1.3509 003
1.0000e0051.6600e0034.4000e0041.0000e005Total 5.0000e- 4.5000e-004 004
4.1000e0045.3200e0031.0000e005
0.0000 1.3393 1.3393 4.0000e0054.0000e0051.6500e- 1.3509 003
1.0000e0051.6600e0034.4000e0041.0000e005Worker 5.0000e- 4.5000e-004 004
4.1000e0045.3200e0031.0000e005
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.0661 0.6042 0.6823 1.1300e- 0.0294 0.0294 0.0277 0.0277 0.0000 97.3580 97.3580 0.0232 0.0000 97.9370 003
Off-Road 0.0661 0.6042 0.6823 1.1300e- 0.0294 0.0294 0.0277 0.0277 0.0000 97.3580 97.3580 0.0232 0.0000 97.9370 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 202.6155 202.6155 6.0100e0030.1834 2.8900e- 0.0141 206.9773 003
0.1863 0.0493 2.7300e003Total 0.0557 0.2317 0.5767 2.1500e- 0.0520 003
0.0000 129.0501 129.0501 3.5500e0033.4600e0030.1586 9.7000e- 130.1693 004
0.1595 0.0421 8.9000e004Worker 0.0485 0.0392 0.5128 1.4000e- 0.0430 003
0.0000 73.5655 73.5655 2.4600e0030.0249 1.9200e- 0.0107 76.8080 003
0.0268 7.1700e0031.8400e003Vendor 7.1100e- 9.0100e-003 003
0.1925 0.0639 7.5000e004
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.1246 1.1399 1.1945 1.9700e- 0.0591 0.0591 0.0556 0.0556 0.0000 169.1592 169.1592 0.0405 0.0000 170.1724 003
Off-Road 0.1246 1.1399 1.1945 1.9700e- 0.0591 0.0591 0.0556 0.0556 0.0000 169.1592 169.1592 0.0405 0.0000 170.1724 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 202.6155 202.6155 6.0100e0030.1834 2.8900e- 0.0141 206.9773 003
0.1863 0.0493 2.7300e003Total 0.0557 0.2317 0.5767 2.1500e- 0.0520 003
0.0000 129.0501 129.0501 3.5500e0033.4600e0030.1586 9.7000e- 130.1693 004
0.1595 0.0421 8.9000e004Worker 0.0485 0.0392 0.5128 1.4000e- 0.0430 003
0.0000 73.5655 73.5655 2.4600e0030.0249 1.9200e- 0.0107 76.8080 003
0.0268 7.1700e0031.8400e003Vendor 7.1100e- 9.0100e-003 003
0.1925 0.0639 7.5000e004
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
I
0.0000 1.3040 1.3040 3.0000e005
3.0000e0051.6500e- 1.3147
003
1.0000e0051.6600e0034.4000e0041.0000e005Worker 4.7000e- 4.5000e-004 004
3.6000e0044.9100e0031.0000e005
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 20.0269 20.0269 6.4800e0035.1000e- 0.0000 20.1888 003
5.1000e0034.6900e003Total 0.0103 0.1019 0.1458 2.3000e- 4.6900e-003 004
Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 20.0269 20.0269 6.4800e0035.1000e- 0.0000 20.1888 003
5.1000e0034.6900e003Off-Road 0.0103 0.1019 0.1458 2.3000e- 4.6900e-003 004
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
3.6 Paving - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 112.6591 112.6591 3.1900e0037.6900e0030.1055 1.0000e- 115.0290 003
0.1065 0.0284 9.4000e004Total 0.0284 0.1063 0.3050 1.1900e- 0.0293 003
0.0000 72.2951 72.2951 1.8400e0031.8400e0030.0912 5.2000e- 72.8884 004
0.0918 0.0242 4.8000e004Worker 0.0259 0.0199 0.2721 7.8000e- 0.0247 004
0.0000 40.3640 40.3640 1.3500e0035.8500e0030.0143 4.8000e- 42.1406 004
0.0148 4.1300e0034.6000e004Vendor 2.4500e- 4.5900e-003 003
0.0864 0.0329 4.1000e004
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.0661 0.6042 0.6823 1.1300e- 0.0294 0.0294 0.0277 0.0277 0.0000 97.3579 97.3579 0.0232 0.0000 97.9369 003
Off-Road 0.0661 0.6042 0.6823 1.1300e- 0.0294 0.0294 0.0277 0.0277 0.0000 97.3579 97.3579 0.0232 0.0000 97.9369 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 112.6591 112.6591 3.1900e0037.6900e0030.1055 1.0000e- 115.0290 003
0.1065 0.0284 9.4000e004Total 0.0284 0.1063 0.3050 1.1900e- 0.0293 003
0.0000 72.2951 72.2951 1.8400e0031.8400e0030.0912 5.2000e- 72.8884 004
0.0918 0.0242 4.8000e004Worker 0.0259 0.0199 0.2721 7.8000e- 0.0247 004
0.0000 40.3640 40.3640 1.3500e0035.8500e0030.0143 4.8000e- 42.1406 004
0.0148 4.1300e0034.6000e004Vendor 2.4500e- 4.5900e-003 003
0.0864 0.0329 4.1000e004
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
0.0000 3.4774 3.4774 9.0000e005
9.0000e0054.3900e- 3.5059
003
3.0000e0054.4100e0031.1700e0032.0000e005Total 1.2500e- 1.1900e-003 003
9.6000e0040.0131 4.0000e005
0.0000 3.4774 3.4774 9.0000e0059.0000e0054.3900e- 3.5059 003
3.0000e0054.4100e0031.1700e0032.0000e005Worker 1.2500e- 1.1900e-003 003
9.6000e0040.0131 4.0000e005
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 2.5533 2.5533 1.5000e0047.1000e- 0.0000 2.5571
004
7.1000e0047.1000e004Total 1.0451 0.0130 0.0181 3.0000e- 7.1000e-004 005
0.0000 2.5533 2.5533 1.5000e0047.1000e- 0.0000 2.5571
004
7.1000e0047.1000e004Off-Road 1.9200e- 7.1000e-004
003
0.0130 0.0181 3.0000e005
Archit. Coating 1.0432 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 1.3040 1.3040 3.0000e0053.0000e0051.6500e- 1.3147 003
1.0000e0051.6600e0034.4000e0041.0000e005Total 4.7000e- 4.5000e-004 004
3.6000e0044.9100e0031.0000e005
0.0000 1.3040 1.3040 3.0000e0053.0000e0051.6500e- 1.3147 003
1.0000e0051.6600e0034.4000e0041.0000e005Worker 4.7000e- 4.5000e-004 004
3.6000e0044.9100e0031.0000e005
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 20.0268 20.0268 6.4800e0035.1000e- 0.0000 20.1888 003
5.1000e0034.6900e003Total 0.0103 0.1019 0.1458 2.3000e- 4.6900e-003 004
Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 20.0268 20.0268 6.4800e0035.1000e- 0.0000 20.1888 003
5.1000e0034.6900e003Off-Road 0.0103 0.1019 0.1458 2.3000e- 4.6900e-003 004
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 1.3040 1.3040 3.0000e0053.0000e0051.6500e- 1.3147 003
1.0000e0051.6600e0034.4000e0041.0000e005Total 4.7000e- 4.5000e-004 004
3.6000e0044.9100e0031.0000e005 I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
72.50 19.00 37 20 43
28.00 13.00 92 5 3
High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)
16.60 8.40 6.90 8.50
0.00 0.00 0 0 0
General Light Industry 16.60 8.40 6.90 59.00
19.20 40.60 86 11 3
Enclosed Parking Structure 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00
H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by
Apartments Mid Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20
4.3 Trip Type Information
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W
Total 9,947.06 10,629.35 12,416.28 16,120,299 16,120,299 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 9,086.58 9,914.40 11553.84 13,024,988 13,024,988 General Light Industry 243.04 97.51 245.00 985,425 985,425 Enclosed Parking Structure 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual VMT
Apartments Mid Rise 617.44 617.44 617.44 2,109,886 2,109,886
4.2 Trip Summary Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT
Unmitigated 3.7478 3.6376 30.5429 0.0583 6.0687 0.0456 6.1142 1.6196 0.0423 1.6619 0.0000 5,479.5218 5,479.5218 0.4454 0.2865 5,576.0273 Mitigated 3.7478 3.6376 30.5429 0.0583 6.0687 0.0456 6.1142 1.6196 0.0423 1.6619 0.0000 5,479.5218 5,479.5218 0.4454 0.2865 5,576.0273 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
0.0000 3.4774 3.4774 9.0000e0059.0000e0054.3900e- 3.5059 003
3.0000e0054.4100e0031.1700e0032.0000e005Total 1.2500e- 1.1900e-003 003
9.6000e0040.0131 4.0000e005
0.0000 3.4774 3.4774 9.0000e0059.0000e0054.3900e- 3.5059 003
3.0000e0054.4100e0031.1700e0032.0000e005Worker 1.2500e- 1.1900e-003 003
9.6000e0040.0131 4.0000e005
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
0.0000 2.5533 2.5533 1.5000e0047.1000e- 0.0000 2.5571
004
7.1000e0047.1000e004Total 1.0451 0.0130 0.0181 3.0000e- 7.1000e-004 005
0.0000 2.5533 2.5533 1.5000e0047.1000e- 0.0000 2.5571
004
7.1000e0047.1000e004Off-Road 1.9200e- 7.1000e-004
003
0.0130 0.0181 3.0000e005
Archit. Coating 1.0432 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
--1 -I -I 1--1
I I I I I I I I I I
6.2700e- 0.0794 0.0000 1,137.3869 1,137.3869 0.0218 0.0209 1,144.1459 003
0.0794 0.0794 0.0794
995.5942 0.0191 0.0183 1,001.5105
Total 0.1149 1.0396 0.8393
0.0695 0.0695 0.0695 0.0000 995.5942
47.2414
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
1.86567e+0
07 0.1006 0.9146 0.7682 5.4900e0030.0695
3.2800e-003 0.0000 46.9623 46.9623 9.0000e0048.6000e0042.6000e0043.2800e0033.2800e0033.2800e003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
General Light
Industry
880040 4.7500e0030.0431 0.0362
Enclosed Parking 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Structure
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
6.6200e-003 0.0000 94.8305 94.8305 1.8200e0031.7400e0035.2000e0046.6200e0036.6200e0036.6200e003 Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise
1.77706e+0
06 9.5800e0030.0819 0.0348
Fugitive Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
95.3940
1,144.1459
Mitigated
NaturalGas
Use
ROG NOx CO SO2
6.2700e- 0.0794 0.0000 1,137.3869 1,137.3869 0.0218 0.0209 003
0.0794 0.0794 0.0794
995.5942 0.0191 0.0183 1,001.5105
Total 0.1149 1.0396 0.8393
0.0695 0.0695 0.0695 0.0000 995.5942
47.2414
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
1.86567e+0
07 0.1006 0.9146 0.7682 5.4900e0030.0695
3.2800e-003 0.0000 46.9623 46.9623 9.0000e0048.6000e0042.6000e0043.2800e0033.2800e0033.2800e003
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
General Light
Industry
880040 4.7500e0030.0431 0.0362
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
95.3940
Enclosed Parking
Structure
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
6.6200e-003 0.0000 94.8305 94.8305 1.8200e0031.7400e0035.2000e0046.6200e0036.6200e0036.6200e003Apartments Mid Rise
1.77706e+0
06 9.5800e0030.0819 0.0348
NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Unmitigated
NaturalGas
Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
NaturalGas 0.0794 0.0794 0.0794 0.0794 0.0000 1,137.3869 1,137.3869 0.0218 0.0209 1,144.1459 Unmitigated
0.1149 1.0396 0.8393 6.2700e003
NaturalGas 0.0794 0.0794 0.0794 0.0794 0.0000 1,137.3869 1,137.3869 0.0218 0.0209 1,144.1459 Mitigated
0.1149 1.0396 0.8393 6.2700e003
0.0000 910.0880 910.0880 0.0768 9.3100e003Electricity 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 914.7830 Unmitigated
0.0000 910.0880 910.0880 0.0768 9.3100e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 914.7830 CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity Mitigated
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
0.000751 0.003721
5.0 Energy Detail
Historical Energy Use: N
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
ROG NOx CO
High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 0.542450 0.061470 0.185138 0.129299 0.023799 0.006448 0.011958 0.009209 0.000810 0.000503 0.024446
0.009209 0.000810 0.000503 0.024446 0.000751 0.003721
0.000751 0.003721
General Light Industry 0.542450 0.061470 0.185138 0.129299 0.023799 0.006448 0.011958 Enclosed Parking Structure 0.542450 0.061470 0.185138 0.129299 0.023799 0.006448 0.011958 0.009209 0.000810 0.000503 0.024446
0.009209 0.000810 0.000503 0.024446 0.000751 0.003721
SBUS MH
Apartments Mid Rise 0.542450 0.061470 0.185138 0.129299 0.023799 0.006448 0.011958 Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY
4.4 Fleet Mix
l l I I I I I Ill l 11
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
6.2 Area by SubCategory
Unmitigated
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
9.1016 30.0608 39.1624 0.0453 5.1000e004Unmitigated 1.1639 0.0470 1.8339 1.5900e- 0.0777 0.0777 0.0777 0.0777 40.4467 003
0.0000 30.0608 30.0608 2.7600e0035.1000e0049.7300e- 30.2814 003
9.7300e0039.7300e003Mitigated 1.1180 0.0402 1.4173 2.3000e- 9.7300e-003 004
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Use Low VOC Paint - Non-Residential Exterior
Use only Natural Gas Hearths
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
914.7830
6.0 Area Detail
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
Use Low VOC Paint - Residential Interior
Use Low VOC Paint - Residential Exterior
Use Low VOC Paint - Non-Residential Interior
Total 910.0880 0.0768 9.3200e003
94.8595
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
3.50487e+0
06 621.5731 0.0525 6.3600e003624.7797
General Light
Industry
532140 94.3727 7.9700e-003 9.7000e004
93.3214
Enclosed Parking
Structure
571200 101.2998 8.5500e-003 1.0400e003101.8224
Land Use kWh/yr t
o
n
MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise
523512 92.8425 7.8400e-003 9.5000e004
914.7830
Mitigated
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Total 910.0880 0.0768 9.3200e003
94.8595
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
3.50487e+0
06 621.5731 0.0525 6.3600e003624.7797
General Light
Industry
532140 94.3727 7.9700e-003 9.7000e004
93.3214
Enclosed Parking
Structure
571200 101.2998 8.5500e-003 1.0400e003101.8224
Land Use kWh/yr t
o
n
MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise
523512 92.8425 7.8400e-003 9.5000e004
5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Unmitigated
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I
179.0586
Mitigated
Total 131.7079 1.4690 0.0357
41.7250
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
24.5862 /
1.56933
67.6671 0.8062 0.0195 93.6417
General Light
Industry
11.3313 / 0 29.7612 0.3714 8.9900e003
43.6920
Enclosed Parking
Structure
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Land Use Mgal t
o
n
MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise
8.86095 /
5.58625
34.2797 0.2914 7.1400e003
7.2 Water by Land Use
Unmitigated
Indoor/Outd
oor Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Unmitigated 131.7079 1.4690 0.0357 179.0586
Category t
o
n
MT/yr
Mitigated 131.7079 1.4690 0.0357 179.0586
7.0 Water Detail
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
0.0000 30.0608 30.0608 2.7500e0035.1000e0049.7300e- 30.2814 003
9.7300e0039.7300e003Total 1.1180 0.0402 1.4173 2.2000e- 9.7300e-003 004
0.0000 2.3010 2.3010 2.2200e0037.7900e- 0.0000 2.3566
003
7.7900e0037.7900e003Landscaping 0.0426 0.0162 1.4071 7.0000e- 7.7900e-003 005
0.0000 27.7599 27.7599 5.3000e0045.1000e0041.9400e- 27.9248 003
1.9400e0031.9400e003Hearth 2.8100e- 1.9400e-003
003
0.0240 0.0102 1.5000e004
Consumer Products 0.9682 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Architectural 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating
0.1043
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
9.1016 30.0608 39.1624 0.0453 5.1000e004Total 1.1639 0.0470 1.8339 1.5800e- 0.0777 0.0777 0.0777 0.0777 40.4467 003
0.0000 2.3010 2.3010 2.2200e0037.7900e- 0.0000 2.3566
003
7.7900e0037.7900e003Landscaping 0.0426 0.0162 1.4071 7.0000e- 7.7900e-003 005
9.1016 27.7599 36.8614 0.0431 5.1000e004Hearth 0.0487 0.0308 0.4269 1.5100e- 0.0699 0.0699 0.0699 0.0699 38.0901 003
Consumer Products 0.9682 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Architectural 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating
0.1043
I
I
I I I I
I
I
I