Covina City Council
November 15, 2022

Total 220.6958 13.0428 0.0000 546.7646

30.5563
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
963.9 195.6630 11.5634 0.0000 484.7468
General Light
Industry

60.76 12.3337 0.7289 0.0000

31.4615
Enclosed Parking
Structure
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Land Use tons t
o
n
MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise

62.56 12.6991 0.7505 0.0000
546.7646
Mitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Total 220.6958 13.0428 0.0000

30.5563
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
963.9 195.6630 11.5634 0.0000 484.7468
General Light
Industry

60.76 12.3337 0.7289 0.0000

31.4615
Enclosed Parking
Structure
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Land Use tons t
o
n
MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise

62.56 12.6991 0.7505 0.0000

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Unmitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Unmitigated 220.6958 13.0428 0.0000 546.7646
t
o
n
MT/yr
Mitigated 220.6958 13.0428 0.0000 546.7646
179.0586

8.0 Waste Detail

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
Category/Year
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Total 131.7079 1.4690 0.0357

41.7250
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)

24.5862 /

1.56933

67.6671 0.8062 0.0195 93.6417
General Light
Industry

11.3313 / 0 29.7612 0.3714 8.9900e003

43.6920
Enclosed Parking
Structure
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Land Use Mgal t
o
n
MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise

8.86095 /

5.58625

34.2797 0.2914 7.1400e003
Indoor/Outd
oor Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e I
I
I I I

User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number

11.0 Vegetation
Load Factor Fuel Type
Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year

Appendix A. Air Quality, Energy and Greenhouse Gases
A-2 Energy Assumptions
and Calculations

Covina MUOD
Construction Energy Analysis
Annual Fuel Summary
10% Buildout Full Buildout Heavy-Duty Construction Equipment 40,890 408,899 Total Project Consumption
33,389 333,889 Annual Consumption
Haul Trucks
28,532 285,315 Total Project Consumption
23,298 232,975 Annual Consumption
Vendor Trucks
45 450 Total Project Consumption
37 367 Annual Consumption
Workers
158 1,584 Total Project Consumption
129 1,293 Annual Consumption
28,576 285,765 Project Consumption of diesel for Haul Trucks and Vendors 23,334 23,334 Annual Consumption
69,466 694,664 Total Gallons Diesel
158 1,584 Total Gallons Gasoline

1.2 12.2 Estimated Project Construction Duration (years) 56,723 56,723 Annual Average Gallons Diesel
129 129 Annual Average Gallons Gasoline
Percent of Annual Project Compared to Los Angeles County Source Fuel Type Gallons 10% Buildout Full Buildout
Workers Gasoline 2,770,000,000 0.000005% 0.000047%
Off-Road/Vendor/Haul Trucks Diesel 610,204,082 0.009% 0.093% Notes:
1 Annual Electricity Summary
Construction Water Energy Estimates 166,688 kWh/year
Total 166,688 kWh/year
Los Angeles County
Gasoline and diesel amounts from CEC, 2019. Available: https://www.energy.ca.gov/data-reports/energy-almanac/transportationenergy/california-retail-fuel-outlet-annual-reporting

Covina MUOD
Construction Energy Analysis
Off-Road Equipment
Equipment ≤ 100 hp
pounds diesel fuel/hp-hr (lb/hp-hr):1 0.408 lb/hp-hr
diesel density (lb/gal):1 7.11 lb/gal
diesel gallons/hp-hr: 0.0574 gal/hp-hr
Total <100 476,461 hp-hr
Total diesel gallons: 27,345 gal
Equipment > 100 hp
pounds diesel fuel/hp-hr (lb/hp-hr):1 0.367 lb/hp-hr
diesel density (lb/gal):1 7.11 lb/gal
diesel gallons/hp-hr: 0.0516 gal/hp-hr
Total >100 262,361 hp-hr
Total diesel gallons: 13,545 gal
diesel density (lb/gal):1 40,890 gal

1. OFFROAD2017 Emission Factor Documentation
Construction Phase Equipment Number Hours/Day HP Load Days Total hp-hr Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8 81 0.73 20 9,461 Demolition Excavators 3 8 158 0.38 20 28,819
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8 247 0.4 20 31,616
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8 247 0.4 10 23,712 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8 97 0.37 10 11,485 Grading Excavators 1 8 158 0.38 20 9,606
Grading Graders 1 8 187 0.41 20 12,267
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8 247 0.4 20 15,808
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8 97 0.37 20 17,227 Building Construction Cranes 1 7 231 0.29 230 107,854
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8 89 0.2 230 98,256
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8 84 0.74 230 114,374 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7 97 0.37 230 173,349 Building Construction Welders 1 8 46 0.45 230 38,088
Paving Pavers 2 8 130 0.42 20 17,472
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8 132 0.36 20 15,206
Paving Rollers 2 8 80 0.38 20 9,728
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6 78 0.48 20 4,493 Total >100 262,361
Total <100 476,461

Covina MUOD
Construction Energy Analysis
Construction Water Energy Estimates
Project Acres 9.01
Construction Duration 1.22
Source
Construction Water Use per
Day (Mgal)
Total Construction Water
Use (Mgal)
Total Electricity Demand from
water Demand (kWh)
Annual Electricity Demand
from water Demand (kWh)
Project 0.027 15.677 204,135 166,688
CalEEMod Water Electricity Factors
Electricity Intensity Factor To
Supply (kWh/Mgal)
Electricity Intensity Factor To
Treat (kWh/Mgal)
Electricity Intensity Factor To
Distribute (kWh/Mgal)
Electricity Intensity Factor For
Wastewater Treatment
(kWh/Mgal)
Project 9727 111 1272 1911
Sources:

Electricity Intensity Factors - California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod).

Estimated construction water use assumed to be generally equivalent to landscape irrigation, based on a factor of 20.94 gallons per year per square foot of landscaped area within the Los Angeles area (Mediterranean climate), which assumes high water demand landscaping materials and an irrigation system efficiency of 85%.

Factor is therefore (20.94 GAL/SF/year) x (43,560 SF/acre) / (365 days/year) / (0.85) = 2,940 gallons/acre/day, rounded up to 3,000 gallons/acre/day. (U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy, Federal Energy Management Program. “Guidelines for Estimating Unmetered Landscaping Water Use." July 2010. Page 12, Table 4 - Annual Irrigation Factor – Landscaped Areas with High Water Requirements).

Covina MUOD
Operational Energy Demand
Electricity kWh/yr GWh/yr Electricity GWh/yr
Apartments Mid Rise 523,512 0.524 LADWP 2025-2026 Total Energy Sales 26,748 Enclosed Parking Structure 571,200 0.571 Project Annual 5.808 General Light Industry 532,140 0.532 Existing Annual 0.806 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 3,504,870 3.505
Net Project Annual 5.002127
Percent Net Project of LADWP 0.0187%
Total Building Energy 5,131,722 5.132
Total 5,131,722 5.132
Total (including water, see below) 5,807,955 5.808 Source: Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, 2017 Long-Term Resource Plan, Appendix A, 2017.

Source: California Air Resources Board, CalEEMod, Version 2016.3.2.

Water Mgal/yr MWh/yr
Apartments Mid Rise 14.45 188.12
Enclosed Parking Structure 0.00 -
General Light Industry 11.33 147.54
High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 26.16 340.57
Total 51.934 676.23
Electricity Intensity Factors kWh/Mgal
Electricity Factor - Supply 9,727
Electricity Factor - Treat 111
Electricity Factor - Distribute 1,272
Electricity Factor - Wastewater Treatment 1,911
Electricity from Water Demand kWh/yr GWh/yr
Total 676,233.00 0.676
Source: California Air Resources Board, CalEEMod, Version 2016.3.2.

Water Demand based on Project Water supply Assessment
Sewage Facilities Charge, Sewage Generation Factor for Residential and Commercial Categories, 2012.

Natural Gas kBtu/yr cubic foot (cf) Natural Gas million cubic foot (cf) SoCalGas 2025 854,830
Apartments Mid Rise 1,777,060 1,716,966 Project Annual 20.594 Enclosed Parking Structure 0 - 18,876,077 Existing Annual 0.010 General Light Industry 880,040 850,280
High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 18,656,700 18,025,797 Mobile Sources 630 609
Total 21,314,430 20,593,653 Net Project Annual 20.584049 Percent Net Project of SoCalGas 0.0024%
Source: California Air Resources Board, CalEEMod, Version 2016.3.2. Source: California Gas and Electric Utilities, 2020 California Gas Conversion factor of 1,035 Btu per cubic foot based on United States Energy Information Administration data Report, p. 145,2020. (see: USEIA, Natural Gas, Heat Content of Natural Gas Consumed, February 28, 2018, https://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/ng_cons_heat_a_EPG0_VGTH_btucf_a.htm. Accessed March 2020.)

0.00061

Covina MUOD
Operational Energy Analysis
Fuel Usage from VMT
Annual VMT (Traffic Study)4
: 16,120,299 miles/year
Fuel Type:1 GAS DSL ELEC NG
Percent: 93.9% 4.1% 1.9% 0.1%
Miles per Gallon Fuel: 27.0 11.0 - 3.42
Annual VMT by Fuel Type (miles): 15,133,411 660,093 311,839 14,957 Annual Fuel Usage (gallons): 560,406 59,762 - 630
Annual Fuel Savings from Electric Vehicles:2 - - 11,548 Gasoline Diesel
Los Angeles County: 3,559,000,000 610,204,082
Project Annual: 560,406 59,762
Existing Annual: - -
Net Annual: 560,406 59,762
Percent Net Project of Los Angeles County: 0.0157% 0.0098% Notes:

1. California Air Resources Board, EMFAC2017 (South Coast Air Basin; Annual; 2024', Aggregate Fleet).

2. Assumes electric vehicles would replace traditional gasoline-fueled vehicles.

3. 4. CalEEMod Output
Los Angeles County Fuel Consumption 3
California Energy Commission, California Retail Fuel Outlet Annual Reporting (CEC-A15) Results, 2018. Available at:
https://ww2.energy.ca.gov/almanac/transportation_data/gasoline/piira_retail_survey.html. Accessed March 2020. Diesel is adjusted to account for retail (48%) and non-retail (52%) diesel sales.

Retail Gasoline Sales by County
(Millions of Gallons)
2010 2011 2012#
County
2010 Survey
Responses
(Millions of
Gallons)
2010 Estimated
Totals (Millions of
Gallons)
2011 Survey
Responses
(Millions of
Gallons)
2011 Estimated
Totals (Millions of
Gallons)
2012A Survey
Responses
(Millions of
Gallons)
2012A Estimated
Totals (Millions of
Gallons)
2013A
Survey
Responses
(Millions of
Gallons)
2013A
Estimated
Totals (Millions of
Gallons)
2014A
Survey
Responses
(Millions of
Gallons)
2014A Estimated
Totals (Millions of
Gallons)
2015A Survey
Responses
(Millions of
Gallons)
2015A Estimated
Totals (Millions of
Gallons)
Alameda 456 551 476 548 480 568 473 603 341 491 432 542 Amador 12 15 12 14 12 14 10 12 11 15 10 13
Butte 66 81 70 81 66 78 64 81 59 85 62 78
Calaveras 11 14 12 14 10 12 10 13 10 14 11 14
Colusa 13 17 9 11 8 10 10 13 7 10 7 9
Contra Costa 332 403 344 395 354 419 331 422 272 392 303 380 Del Norte 6 8 6 7 6 7 4 5 5 7 5 6
El Dorado 55 68 57 67 64 75 56 72 36 52 65 81
Fresno 285 342 290 335 288 341 269 344 209 300 264 331
Glenn 12 14 12 14 11 12 11 14 11 16 13 16
Humboldt 44 54 46 54 45 53 51 64 31 44 47 59
Imperial 56 69 51 60 46 54 46 58 58 83 63 79
Inyo 16 19 16 18 13 16 12 16 12 17 14 18
Kern 293 362 309 359 301 356 287 367 267 384 299 375
Kings 42 51 41 48 40 47 38 49 31 45 41 51
Lake 20 25 18 22 17 20 19 24 17 25 19 23
Lassen 6 7 6 7 5 6 5 6 6 8 7 9
Los Angeles 3,005 3,658 3,069 3,554 2,916 3,451 2,700 3,445 2,606 3,749 2,762 3,465 Madera 47 57 54 61 44 53 43 54 31 45 35 44
Marin 78 94 91 103 91 107 83 106 52 75 83 105
Mariposa 6 7 6 7 5 6 4 5 6 9 5 6
Mendocino 33 41 34 40 36 43 33 42 28 40 32 40
Merced 86 106 81 95 78 92 74 94 58 83 84 105
Mono 6 7 5 6 2 2 6 8 6 8 6 7
Monterey 124 152 134 155 124 147 139 177 87 126 147 184 Napa 42 52 42 47 49 58 41 52 27 39 50 63
Nevada 34 42 30 35 29 34 19 25 19 27 31 40
Orange 1,162 1,406 1,162 1,338 1,145 1,355 1,044 1,332 1,018 1,465 1,092 1,370 Placer 154 190 162 189 162 192 131 167 118 170 167 209
Plumas 6 7 7 8 6 7 3 4 5 8 5 7
Riverside 781 952 792 916 756 895 725 925 702 1,010 828 1,039 Sacramento 467 566 482 553 473 560 446 568 308 442 465 584 San Benito 15 18 14 16 17 20 5 7 10 14 12 15
San Bernardino 747 902 761 871 742 878 697 889 659 948 725 909 San Diego 1,094 1,320 1,122 1,291 1,079 1,277 972 1,241 940 1,352 1,123 1,408 San Francisco 112 138 129 151 126 149 126 161 71 102 107 134 San Joaquin 248 303 260 301 253 299 254 325 217 312 287 360 San Luis Obispo 121 147 123 144 105 124 109 140 101 145 117 147 San Mateo 232 275 272 310 258 306 244 311 159 229 243 304 Santa Barbara 141 174 140 164 140 166 135 172 124 178 148 186 Santa Clara 514 621 600 691 589 697 546 696 460 661 580 727 Santa Cruz 84 103 91 106 89 105 79 101 53 77 77 96
Shasta 72 88 73 85 77 91 65 83 55 79 76 95
Siskiyou 20 25 17 19 19 23 9 12 10 14 21 27
Solano 158 190 191 218 180 213 158 202 116 167 160 201
Sonoma 157 189 155 178 160 189 163 208 146 210 160 201
Stanislaus 191 230 184 212 173 205 144 183 159 229 201 252 Sutter 30 37 31 37 34 40 33 42 17 24 30 38
Tehama 27 33 24 28 23 27 19 24 18 26 24 30
Trinity 3 4 3 4 1 2 3 4 3 4 3 4
Tulare 109 132 121 139 120 142 91 116 107 155 114 143
Tuolumne 14 17 13 16 15 18 12 15 14 21 18 23
Ventura 285 345 290 335 262 310 246 314 249 358 256 321 Yolo 82 100 76 87 74 87 75 96 63 90 82 103
Yuba 24 29 26 30 22 26 23 30 14 20 24 30
Other Counties* 2 3 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 2
Total 12,238 14,860 12,644 14,596 12,241 14,486 11,396 14,540 10,220 14,701 12,044 15,108 A - 2012 to 2020 data are not directly comparable to other years since an improved methodology is used, but is within 5 percent compared to the previous methodology. *
Other Counties include Alpine, Modoc and Sierra.
2013# 2014# 2015#

Retail Gasoline Sales by County
(Millions of Gallons)
2016A Survey
Responses
(Millions of
Gallons)
2016A
Estimated
Totals (Millions of
Gallons)
2017A Survey
Responses
(Millions of
Gallons)
2017A
Estimated
Totals (Millions of
Gallons)
2018A
Survey
Responses (Millions of
Gallons)
2018A
Estimated Totals
(Millions of Gallons)
2019A
Survey
Responses (Millions of
Gallons)
2019A
Estimated Totals
(Millions of Gallons)
2020A Survey Responses
(Millions of Gallons)
2020A Estimated
Totals (Millions
of Gallons)
518 582 521 583 495 569 505 591 400 442
12 14 13 15 14 17 16 18 12 13
74 83 78 87 75 86 62 78 58 68
13 15 14 15 13 15 14 15 14 15
10 11 11 12 11 13 11 13 12 15
384 431 385 430 346 397 374 427 304 336
6 7 6 7 6 7 4 6 5 5
72 81 73 82 66 76 64 74 58 62
318 358 328 367 320 368 306 376 296 347
15 17 17 18 15 17 14 18 13 15
54 61 49 55 51 58 42 53 51 56
77 86 74 83 78 89 73 86 59 64
16 18 16 18 16 18 14 17 14 16
362 407 349 390 345 396 340 392 318 364
50 57 54 60 52 60 67 76 49 52
19 21 19 21 20 23 18 24 17 20
7 8 5 6 4 5 5 7 6 6
3,184 3,577 3,272 3,659 3,169 3,638 3,189 3,559 2,513 2,770 52 59 56 62 49 57 44 62 45 63
91 102 90 101 71 82 86 96 72 77
7 8 5 6 6 7 7 8 4 5
37 42 34 38 35 40 27 44 35 37
101 114 105 117 115 132 100 119 91 106
7 8 5 5 6 7 7 8 6 7
157 177 155 174 157 181 148 174 123 141
50 57 47 53 53 61 54 57 40 44
36 40 35 39 33 38 29 39 31 36
1,224 1,375 1,236 1,382 1,222 1,402 1,198 1,325 943 1,029 181 204 182 203 179 206 177 198 150 163
5 5 5 6 5 6 5 6 5 6
921 1,035 941 1,052 916 1,052 921 1,046 799 876
534 600 535 599 511 586 536 600 475 689
15 17 18 20 15 17 12 21 10 18
899 1,010 888 993 862 990 851 977 757 823
1,221 1,372 1,231 1,377 1,208 1,387 1,197 1,325 973 1,055 119 134 120 134 105 120 107 118 76 91
303 340 310 347 293 336 289 352 255 292
127 142 127 142 131 150 125 138 103 115
289 325 291 326 264 304 293 322 215 238
161 181 152 170 167 191 166 177 136 146
638 717 613 685 560 643 614 713 446 511
85 95 84 94 78 90 72 90 69 74
73 82 83 92 76 87 72 82 68 76
24 27 26 29 25 28 26 27 22 25
187 210 194 217 188 216 182 216 155 180
186 209 186 208 167 192 169 204 146 167
217 244 227 253 212 244 196 245 178 197
35 39 35 39 35 40 27 38 28 30
25 29 26 29 27 31 28 30 25 26
4 5 4 5 4 4 2 4 3 4
136 152 149 167 147 168 144 174 126 149
21 23 22 25 22 25 21 23 19 20
294 330 302 338 298 342 297 329 242 262
98 110 101 113 96 110 97 114 76 91
32 36 30 34 40 46 27 32 26 35
2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 2
13,785 15,491 13,936 15,584 13,475 15,471 13,473 15,365 11,174 12,572 2020# 2019# 2016# 2017# 2018#

Retail Diesel Sales by County
(Millions of Gallons)
2010 2011
County
2010 Survey
Responses
(Millions of
Gallons)
2010 Estimated
Totals (Millions of
Gallons)
2011 Survey
Responses
(Millions of
Gallons)
2011 Estimated
Totals (Millions of
Gallons)
2012A Survey
Responses
(Millions of
Gallons)
2012A
Estimated
Totals (Millions of
Gallons)
2013A Survey
Responses
(Millions of
Gallons)
2013A Estimated
Totals (Millions of
Gallons)
2014A Survey
Responses
(Millions of
Gallons)
2014A Estimated
Totals (Millions of
Gallons)
2015A
Survey
Responses
(Millions of
Gallons)
2015A
Estimated
Totals (Millions of
Gallons)
Alameda 29 32 26 28 30 36 27 34 19 27 38 49
Amador 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 1 2 1 2
Butte 9 10 9 10 7 9 8 10 8 10 9 11
Calaveras 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 1 2 2 2
Colusa 3 3 2 3 4 5 4 5 2 2 3 4
Contra Costa 15 18 19 21 17 20 17 21 12 17 19 24
Del Norte 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2
El Dorado 6 8 6 7 6 7 5 6 4 6 7 9
Fresno 30 33 35 38 33 40 23 29 18 25 39 50
Glenn 5 5 4 4 4 5 4 5 4 5 5 6
Humboldt 10 12 10 12 10 12 11 14 4 5 10 13
Imperial 9 10 8 9 7 8 8 10 8 11 9 11
Inyo 3 4 3 4 2 2 3 4 3 3 3 4
Kern 111 117 125 129 133 158 118 148 124 171 125 160
Kings 7 7 7 8 7 9 5 6 4 6 7 9
Lake 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 3 2 3 3 3
Lassen 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 3
Los Angeles 212 235 221 239 205 245 190 239 194 267 257 328 Madera 23 24 23 24 24 28 18 23 22 31 26 33
Marin 3 4 2 3 3 3 2 3 2 2 2 3
Mariposa 1 1 1 1 1 1 - 1 2 2 1 1
Mendocino 6 7 7 8 7 9 6 6 4 5 6 7
Merced 44 45 37 38 46 55 49 62 49 68 54 69
Mono 1 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Monterey 21 23 24 26 25 30 22 27 13 18 23 29
Napa 2 2 2 2 6 7 2 3 2 3 6 8
Nevada 5 5 5 5 4 4 1 2 4 6 7 8
Orange 38 47 36 42 38 46 33 42 37 51 46 59
Placer 13 16 13 15 12 15 9 12 10 13 13 16
Plumas 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Riverside 84 93 87 94 89 107 86 109 100 138 119 152
Sacramento 33 37 32 35 27 32 18 21 21 29 28 36
San Bernardino 141 149 136 142 158 189 164 206 152 210 198 253 San Diego 69 80 64 72 62 74 58 73 67 93 87 111
San Francisco 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 5 1 2 5 6
San Joaquin 73 75 85 87 84 99 90 113 86 119 102 131
San Luis Obispo 12 14 16 18 11 13 9 12 12 17 19 24
San Mateo 10 12 8 10 8 10 8 10 4 6 15 19
Santa Barbara 13 14 16 17 10 13 12 15 13 18 20 26
Santa Clara 23 26 26 28 27 32 28 35 25 35 36 47
Santa Cruz 4 5 5 6 4 5 4 6 2 3 5 6
Shasta 20 23 19 21 16 19 18 22 13 18 21 27
Siskiyou 5 6 11 11 16 20 15 19 16 20 20 26
Solano 14 17 18 20 14 16 14 17 8 11 14 18
Sonoma 14 16 18 19 13 16 14 18 12 17 15 20
Stanislaus 33 36 27 29 25 30 15 19 20 27 26 33
Sutter 4 5 2 3 3 4 4 5 2 3 4 5
Tehama 31 32 38 39 35 42 37 47 25 35 37 48
Tulare 23 25 33 35 27 32 31 39 31 43 34 43
Tuolumne 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 3
Ventura 20 23 32 34 23 27 23 29 25 34 27 34
Yolo 33 34 26 27 27 33 30 37 29 40 27 35
Yuba 4 4 4 5 3 4 3 4 2 3 2 3
Other Counties* 1 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 2
Total 1,285 1,414 1,346 1,447 1,327 1,589 1,261 1,587 1,226 1,691 1,592 2,033 A - 2012-2020 data are not directly comparable to other years since an improved methodology is used, but is within 5 percent compared to the previous methodology. * Other Counties include Alpine, Modoc, San Benito, Sierra and Trinity.

Note: Non-Retail diesel sales, which comprise approximately 51% of all diesel sales, are not reported in this chart. 2012# 2013# 2014# 2015#

Retail Diesel Sales by County
(Millions of Gallons)
2016A Survey
Responses
(Millions of
Gallons)
2016A Estimated
Totals (Millions of
Gallons)
2017A Survey
Responses
(Millions of
Gallons)
2017A Estimated
Totals (Millions of
Gallons)
2018A Survey
Responses
(Millions of
Gallons)
2018A
Estimated
Totals (Millions of
Gallons)
2019A Survey
Responses
(Millions of
Gallons)
2019A Estimated
Totals (Millions of
Gallons)
2020A Survey
Responses
(Millions of
Gallons)
2020A Estimated
Totals (Millions of
Gallons)
47 54 51 58 56 62 48 55 47 51
2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 2
11 13 11 13 12 13 12 15 10 11
3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3
4 4 2 3 4 4 7 7 10 11
23 26 24 28 31 34 24 27 22 23
2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 1 2
8 9 8 10 8 9 8 10 8 8
40 46 40 45 46 51 39 49 62 66
12 14 16 19 16 17 18 19 17 18
13 14 8 9 7 8 6 7 6 6
14 16 11 12 20 22 21 25 22 24
3 4 3 4 3 3 3 4 3 4
131 149 107 121 97 108 96 105 108 116
5 6 7 7 8 9 8 9 7 7
1 1 3 3 3 4 3 4 3 4
4 4 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1
273 309 267 301 228 253 246 276 279 299
28 31 29 33 28 31 23 24 30 32
4 4 4 4 3 3 4 4 4 4
1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
9 10 6 6 5 6 5 8 9 9
59 66 38 42 35 39 28 36 28 30
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
24 28 24 27 24 26 23 26 21 22
6 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 6
8 9 8 9 7 8 5 8 7 8
52 59 54 61 49 55 51 56 49 53
15 17 15 17 16 17 16 17 32 35
1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1
128 145 131 148 119 132 108 122 134 144
38 42 42 48 41 45 37 41 41 44
223 252 235 265 176 195 165 178 148 159
93 105 92 103 92 103 94 110 88 94
6 6 5 6 5 5 5 5 4 4
116 131 111 126 105 117 101 113 86 93
20 23 19 21 20 22 20 22 19 20
13 14 15 17 16 17 18 19 12 13
22 25 17 19 21 24 18 19 16 17
30 34 32 36 43 48 33 42 32 35
5 6 6 6 6 7 4 6 7 8
21 24 22 25 21 24 14 16 13 14
19 22 18 21 16 17 16 17 17 18
17 19 22 24 23 25 24 27 25 27
20 23 20 23 20 22 28 32 28 30
20 22 30 34 32 36 33 35 36 39
5 6 3 4 4 5 5 6 5 5
35 39 34 38 18 20 17 18 7 8
37 42 37 41 31 34 42 45 47 51
2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
29 32 32 36 30 33 33 35 29 32
32 37 27 30 25 28 24 26 21 22
4 5 8 9 11 12 4 5 4 4
3 3 3 3 2 2 2 3 2 2
1,742 1,971 1,717 1,937 1,602 1,777 1,559 1,756 1,624 1,744 2020# 2018# 2019# 2016# 2017#

Appendix A. Air Quality, Energy and Greenhouse Gases
A-3 Greenhouse Gas
Emissions
Assumptions and
Modeling

CalEEMod Inputs (Non-Default information only)
Project Location
County Los Angeles
Air District South Coast
Climate Zone 9
Construction Year 2022
Operational Year 2024
Utility Provider Southern California Edison
Note: 10% of construction occuring at any time assumed.

Land Use

SF/ DU/
Seat/ Room
/Spaces KSF Acres
Residential 4.49
Residential 136 3.49
Parking garage 272 1.00 Parking underground structure
Commercial/Industrial 2.99
Recreational 81,000 81.000 1.495
Industrial 49,000 49.000 1.495
Note:

General Construction Notes:
1 Construction schedule based on CalEEMod defaults.
2 Assuming 2 parking spots per dwelling unit.
3 Assuming no parking associated with non-residential land uses to capture most construction and operational emissions. 4 CalEEMod limits size of general light industry to < 50,000 sq ft; rest of 130 ksf split into commercial 5 High turnover restaurant land use expected to produce worst-case operational emissions; 6 VOC Painting for Parking/Roadways.
7 Assuming no offroad equipment mitigation at this time General Operations Notes:
1 Only natural gas fireplaces
2 Low-VOC painting for architectural coatings.
3 Not assuming any generators or other stationary equipment at this time. 4 Not assuming any electrify landscape equipment at this time. 5 Residential VMT from Traffic Report, non-residential VMT from CalEEMod 6 Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers, provided the Transportation Assessment Report Covina Mixed-Use Overlay District , dated March 3, 2022. 7 Total project-related trips from residential land-uses were provided, and were reported as 6174 trips per day. 8 6174 trips per day corresponds to Residential Work Trip / Size / Day of 4.54 for input into CalEEMod.

Demolition
Debris Amounts Acres Sq Ft CY
Construction Area 7.48 325830
Building (25%) 81458 9051
Hardscape (75%) 244373 4525
13576
Density of Asphalt or Concrete
Debris (ref 1) (lb/CY) 2400
Debris Weight (ton) - PROJECT 16292
City of Covina Mixed Use Overlay District (MUOD)
Construction and Operational Assumptions
CalEEMod Land Use Type
Mid-rise Apartment
High Turnover Restaurant
General Light Industry
- - >-- - >--- - >-- - >--- - >-- - >--

Truck Trip Calculations
Truck Size (CY) 10
Round Truck Trip Counts 1,358
Total 1-Way Truck Trip Counts 2,715
Construction Days 20
Truck Trips/Day 136
Demolition Notes:
1 Assuming 25% of acreage contains a 1-story building.
2 Assuming 12 foot building height and 25% of total construction area square footage due to empty space in buidings. 3 Assuming 1/2 foot thickness for hardscape.
4 Truck size of 10 CY assuming void space for construction debris. 5 Construction days from the demolition phase in CalEEmod file.

References:
1 Density of Asphalt and Concrete Debris , 2400 lb/CY (1.2 ton/CY) https://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/swfacilities/cdi/tools/calculations Material Export
Square Footage per Parking Space1 400
# of Underground Parking Spaces 272
Parking Area (Sq Ft) 108800
Soil Export (CY)1 48356
Truck Size (CY) 14
Round Truck Trip Counts 3454
Total 1-Way Truck Trip Counts 6908
Construction Days 10
Truck Trips/Day 691
Material Export Notes:
1 It is assumed underground parking activities will occur and require material export. 2 However, it is assume that no material import will be necessary. 3 Square footage per parking space is an assumption used in CalEEMod. 4 Soil export assumes a 12-foot excavation height.
5 Construction days from the site prep phase in CalEEmod file.

Greenhouse Gas Emissions Calculations
Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Construction Emissions - 10% Buildout Scenario
2022 Project Emissions (MT/yr) 0.00 741.8 741.8 0.09 0.06 761.9 2023 Project Emissions (MT/yr) 0.00 237.4 237.4 0.03 0.01 240.5 Total 10% Buildout Scenario Emissions (MT) 0.00 979.2 979.2 0.12 0.07 1,002.4 Total Project Buildout Scenario Emissions (MT) 0.00 9,792 9,792 1.19 0.68 10,024 Total Project Duration (Years)
Amortized Over 30 Years (MT/yr) 0.00 3,997 3,997 0.48 0.28 4,092 Operation Emissions
10% Buildout Scenario
Area 0.00 30.06 30.06 0.00 0.00 30.28
Energy 0.00 2,047.47 2,047.47 0.10 0.03 2,058.93
Mobile 0.00 5,479.52 5,479.52 0.45 0.29 5,576.03
Waste 220.70 0.00 220.70 13.04 0.00 546.76
Water 14.21 117.50 131.71 1.47 0.04 179.06
Total 10% Buildout Scenario Emissions (MT/yr) 234.90 7,674.56 7,909.46 15.06 0.35 8,391.06 Total Project Buildout Emissions (MT/yr) 2,349.0 76,746 79,095 150.59 3.53 83,911 Total net operational + amortized construction GHGs (MT/yr) 2,349 80,743 83,092 151.1 3.81 88,003

12.25 City of Covina Mixed Use Overlay District (MUOD)
Emissions Summary
- -- -- -- -- --
-

0.0000 49,729.424
7 49,729.424
7 3.6602 7.2843 51,991.639
4 Maximum 104.6366 140.9068 46.1423 0.4580 32.4884 2.5150 35.0033 13.5507 2.3469 15.8976 2023 104.6366 16.7696 23.9800 0.0562 2.5589 0.7236 3.2826 0.6865 0.6808 1.3673 0.0000 5,597.7352 5,597.7352 0.7176 0.1980 5,674.0125

0.0000 49,729.424
7 49,729.424
7 3.6602 7.2843 51,991.639
4 2022 6.1510 140.9068 46.1423 0.4580 32.4884 2.5150 35.0033 13.5507 2.3469 15.8976 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2

2.0 Emissions Summary

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 4.09 4.54
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 5.44 4.54
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 6,045.00 6,908.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 4.91 4.54
tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 48,356.00
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 1,611.00 2,715.00
tblAreaMitigation UseLowVOCPaintParkingCheck False True tblFireplaces NumberWood 6.80 0.00
Vehicle Trips - Residential trips provided from traffic study. Light Industrial and Commercial trips used CalEEMod defaults.

Woodstoves - No wood fireplaces permitted.

Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation -
Area Mitigation -
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
Project Characteristics -
Land Use -
Trips and VMT - Trips conservatively calculated outside of CalEEMod. Haul truck trip numbers conservatively assuming 10 CY for demo and 14 CY site prep. The remaining construction trips are CalEEMod defaults Demolition - Grading -
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
390.98 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.033 N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.004
31 Climate Zone 9 Operational Year 2024
Utility Company Southern California Edison

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) Apartments Mid Rise 136.00 Dwelling Unit 3.58 136,000.00 389 Enclosed Parking Structure 272.00 Space 2.45 108,800.00 0 General Light Industry 49.00 1000sqft 1.12 49,000.00 0
High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 81.00 1000sqft 1.86 81,000.00 0 South Coast AQMD Air District, Summer

1.0 Project Characteristics

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 3/29/2022 2:14 PM
City of Covina MUOD Construction - South Coast AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied City of Covina MUOD Construction

I I I I

3 Grading Grading 5/13/2022 6/9/2022 5 20
20 2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 4/29/2022 5/12/2022 5 10 End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 4/1/2022 4/28/2022 5

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date

0.00 85.16 11.75 0.00 85.44 31.99 100.00 0.00 1.59 53.53 0.00 1.74 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

9.90 1.81 13.46 19.92
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Bio- CO2
PM10
Total 33.4096 29.579 214.3346 0.4373 39.9088 0.9476 40.8563 10.6349 0.9267 11.5616 0 49,777.25 49,777.25 3.2577 2.1349 50,494.88 Mobile 26.3376 21.8355 197.6632 0.3901 39.9088 0.2951 40.2039 10.6349 0.2743 10.9091 40,439.07 40,439.07 3.0595 1.9641 41,100.84 Energy 0.6297 5.6963 4.5989 0.0344 0.4351 0.4351 0.4351 0.4351 6,869.89 6,869.89 0.1317 0.126 6,910.71 Area 6.4424 2.0472 12.0724 0.0128 0.2174 0.2174 0.2174 0.2174 0 2,468.29 2,468.29 0.0665 0.0449 2,483.33 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
802.6228 49,777.247
2 50,579.870
1 7.0098 2.1349 51,391.309
1 Total 37.0802 30.1228 247.6684 0.5460 39.9088 6.3854 46.2941 10.6349 6.3645 16.9994 40,439.068
6 40,439.068
6 3.0595 1.9641 41,100.843
2 Mobile 26.3376 21.8355 197.6632 0.3901 39.9088 0.2951 40.2039 10.6349 0.2743 10.9091 Energy 0.6297 5.6963 4.5989 0.0344 0.4351 0.4351 0.4351 0.4351 6,869.8876 6,869.8876 0.1317 0.1260 6,910.7119 Area 10.1129 2.5910 45.4063 0.1216 5.6552 5.6552 5.6552 5.6552 802.6228 2,468.2911 3,270.9139 3.8186 0.0449 3,379.7540 Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

2.2 Overall Operational
Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

35.16 0.00 32.19 43.64 0.00 35.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Bio- CO2
PM10

0.00 Maximum 104.6366 140.9068 46.1423 0.458 20.164 2.515 22.679 7.3377 2.3469 9.6846 0 49,729.42 49,729.42 3.6602 7.2843 51,991.64 2023 104.6366 16.7696 23.98 0.0562 2.5589 0.7236 3.2826 0.6865 0.6808 1.3673 0 5,597.74 5,597.74 0.7176 0.198 5,674.01 2022 6.151 140.9068 46.1423 0.458 20.164 2.515 22.679 7.3377 2.3469 9.6846 0 49,729.42 49,729.42 3.6602 7.2843 51,991.64 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I
I
I
I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I ! I I I

1.2427 18.6743

1.1553

0.0000 0.0000

1.0524 3,773.0920
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
Total 2.6392 25.7194 20.5941 0.0388 17.4316 2.6393 1.1553 3.7946 3,746.7812 3,746.7812 Off-Road 2.6392 25.7194 20.5941

0.0000 17.4316 2.6393 0.0000 2.6393
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 17.4316

0.0388 1.2427 1.2427 1.1553 3,746.7812 3,746.7812 1.0524 3,773.0920 Fugitive Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Water Exposed Area

3.2 Demolition - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2

14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Architectural Coating 1 40.00 0.00 0.00
Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70

14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Building Construction 9 198.00 54.00 0.00
Grading 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70

14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 6,908.00
Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 2,715.00 14.70
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40
Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38
Load Factor
Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 15
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 20
Acres of Paving: 2.45
Residential Indoor: 275,400; Residential Outdoor: 91,800; Non-Residential Indoor: 195,000; Non-Residential Outdoor: 65,000; Striped Parking Area:

OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power 20 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 5/26/2023 6/22/2023 5 20 5 Paving Paving 4/28/2023 5/25/2023 5
4 Building Construction Building Construction 6/10/2022 4/27/2023 5 230 I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
Total 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 20.2039 1.6126 21.8164 10.1853 1.4836 11.6688 3,686.0619 3,686.0619 1.1922 3,715.8655 Off-Road 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 1.6126 1.6126 1.4836 1.4836 3,686.0619 3,686.0619 1.1922 3,715.8655 Fugitive Dust 20.2039 0.0000 20.2039 10.1853 0.0000 10.1853 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.3 Site Preparation - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.6253 21.2163 5.6342 0.0837 2.5422 0.1781 2.7203 0.6953 0.1704 0.8657 9,166.0097 9,166.0097 0.4881 1.4342 9,605.6160 154.3721 154.3721 4.0100e0033.6700e0030.1677 1.0000e- 155.5659 003

0.1687 0.0445 9.2000e004Worker 0.0517 0.0363 0.5726 1.5200e- 0.0454 003
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.5736 21.1799 5.0616 0.0822 2.3745 0.1771 2.5516 0.6509 0.1694 0.8203 9,011.6377 9,011.6377 0.4841 1.4306 9,450.0501 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 2.6392 25.7194 20.5941 0.0388 6.7983 1.2427 8.0410 1.0293 1.1553 2.1846 0.0000 3,746.7812 3,746.7812 1.0524 3,773.0920 Off-Road 2.6392 25.7194 20.5941 0.0388 1.2427 1.2427 1.1553 1.1553 0.0000 3,746.7812 3,746.7812 1.0524 3,773.0920 Fugitive Dust 6.7983 0.0000 6.7983 1.0293 0.0000 1.0293 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.6253 21.2163 5.6342 0.0837 2.5422 0.1781 2.7203 0.6953 0.1704 0.8657 9,166.0097 9,166.0097 0.4881 1.4342 9,605.6160 154.3721 154.3721 4.0100e0033.6700e0030.1677 1.0000e- 155.5659 003

0.1687 0.0445 9.2000e004Worker 0.0517 0.0363 0.5726 1.5200e- 0.0454 003
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2.3745 0.1771 2.5516 0.6509 0.1694 0.8203 9,011.6377 9,011.6377 0.4841 1.4306 9,450.0501 CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.5736 21.1799 5.0616 0.0822
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O PM10
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 1.9486 20.8551 15.2727 0.0297 7.0826 0.9409 8.0234 3.4247 0.8656 4.2903 2,872.0464 2,872.0464 0.9289 2,895.2684 Off-Road 1.9486 20.8551 15.2727 0.0297 0.9409 0.9409 0.8656 0.8656 2,872.0464 2,872.0464 0.9289 2,895.2684 Fugitive Dust 7.0826 0.0000 7.0826 3.4247 0.0000 3.4247 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.4 Grading - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
46,043.362
9 46,043.362
9 2.4681 7.2843 48,275.773
9 Total 2.9809 107.8232 26.4446 0.4199 12.2845 0.9024 13.1869 3.3655 0.8633 4.2288 185.2465 185.2465 4.8100e0034.4000e0030.2012 1.2000e- 186.6790 003

0.2024 0.0534 1.1100e003Worker 0.0620 0.0436 0.6871 1.8200e- 0.0545 003
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 45,858.116
4 45,858.116
4 2.4632 7.2799 48,089.094
9 Hauling 2.9189 107.7796 25.7575 0.4181 12.0833 0.9012 12.9845 3.3121 0.8622 4.1743 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 7.8795 1.6126 9.4921 3.9723 1.4836 5.4558 0.0000 3,686.0619 3,686.0619 1.1922 3,715.8655 Off-Road 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 1.6126 1.6126 1.4836 1.4836 0.0000 3,686.0619 3,686.0619 1.1922 3,715.8655 Fugitive Dust 7.8795 0.0000 7.8795 3.9723 0.0000 3.9723 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
46,043.362
9 46,043.362
9 2.4681 7.2843 48,275.773
9 Total 2.9809 107.8232 26.4446 0.4199 12.2845 0.9024 13.1869 3.3655 0.8633 4.2288 185.2465 185.2465 4.8100e0034.4000e0030.2012 1.2000e- 186.6790 003

0.2024 0.0534 1.1100e003Worker 0.0620 0.0436 0.6871 1.8200e- 0.0545 003
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 45,858.116
4 45,858.116
4 2.4632 7.2799 48,089.094
9 Hauling 2.9189 107.7796 25.7575 0.4181 12.0833 0.9012 12.9845 3.3121 0.8622 4.1743 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I

Worker 0.6819 0.4797 7.5577 0.0200 2.2132 0.0132 2.2264 0.5869 0.0122 0.5991 2,037.7114 2,037.7114 0.0529 0.0484 2,053.4692 Vendor 0.0985 2.5127 0.8615 0.0103 0.3458 0.0263 0.3721 0.0996 0.0251 0.1247 1,110.6145 1,110.6145 0.0372 0.1610 1,159.5276 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.3336 2,554.3336 0.6120 2,569.6322 Off-Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.3336 2,554.3336 0.6120 2,569.6322 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
154.3721 154.3721 4.0100e0033.6700e0030.1677 1.0000e- 155.5659 003

0.1687 0.0445 9.2000e004Total 0.0517 0.0363 0.5726 1.5200e- 0.0454 003
154.3721 154.3721 4.0100e0033.6700e0030.1677 1.0000e- 155.5659 003

0.1687 0.0445 9.2000e004Worker 0.0517 0.0363 0.5726 1.5200e- 0.0454 003
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 1.9486 20.8551 15.2727 0.0297 2.7622 0.9409 3.7031 1.3357 0.8656 2.2012 0.0000 2,872.0464 2,872.0464 0.9289 2,895.2684 Off-Road 1.9486 20.8551 15.2727 0.0297 0.9409 0.9409 0.8656 0.8656 0.0000 2,872.0464 2,872.0464 0.9289 2,895.2684 Fugitive Dust 2.7622 0.0000 2.7622 1.3357 0.0000 1.3357 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
154.3721 154.3721 4.0100e0033.6700e0030.1677 1.0000e- 155.5659 003

0.1687 0.0445 9.2000e004Total 0.0517 0.0363 0.5726 1.5200e- 0.0454 003
154.3721 154.3721 4.0100e0033.6700e0030.1677 1.0000e- 155.5659 003

0.1687 0.0445 9.2000e004Worker 0.0517 0.0363 0.5726 1.5200e- 0.0454 003
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Mitigated Construction On-Site
Total 0.6922 2.3847 7.7360 0.0292 2.5589 0.0239 2.5828 0.6865 0.0224 0.7089 3,042.5253 3,042.5253 0.0831 0.1980 3,103.6064 Worker 0.6325 0.4245 6.9643 0.0194 2.2132 0.0125 2.2256 0.5869 0.0115 0.5984 1,983.9583 1,983.9583 0.0475 0.0448 1,998.4821 Vendor 0.0597 1.9602 0.7717 9.8300e- 0.3458 0.0114 0.3572 0.0996 0.0109 0.1105 1,058.5670 1,058.5670 0.0356 0.1533 1,105.1243 003
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.2099 2,555.2099 0.6079 2,570.4061 Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.2099 2,555.2099 0.6079 2,570.4061 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.7804 2.9924 8.4192 0.0304 2.5590 0.0395 2.5985 0.6865 0.0373 0.7238 3,148.3258 3,148.3258 0.0902 0.2095 3,212.9968 Worker 0.6819 0.4797 7.5577 0.0200 2.2132 0.0132 2.2264 0.5869 0.0122 0.5991 2,037.7114 2,037.7114 0.0529 0.0484 2,053.4692 Vendor 0.0985 2.5127 0.8615 0.0103 0.3458 0.0263 0.3721 0.0996 0.0251 0.1247 1,110.6145 1,110.6145 0.0372 0.1610 1,159.5276 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.3336 2,554.3336 0.6120 2,569.6322 Off-Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.3336 2,554.3336 0.6120 2,569.6322 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.7804 2.9924 8.4192 0.0304 2.5590 0.0395 2.5985 0.6865 0.0373 0.7238 3,148.3258 3,148.3258 0.0902 0.2095 3,212.9968 I

PM10 Total Fugitive Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
150.2999 150.2999 3.6000e0033.3900e0030.1677 9.4000e- 151.4002 004

0.1686 0.0445 8.7000e004Total 0.0479 0.0322 0.5276 1.4700e- 0.0453 003
150.2999 150.2999 3.6000e0033.3900e0030.1677 9.4000e- 151.4002 004

0.1686 0.0445 8.7000e004Worker 0.0479 0.0322 0.5276 1.4700e- 0.0453 003
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.5841 2,207.5841 0.7140 2,225.4336 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.5841 2,207.5841 0.7140 2,225.4336 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.6 Paving - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.6922 2.3847 7.7360 0.0292 2.5589 0.0239 2.5828 0.6865 0.0224 0.7089 3,042.5253 3,042.5253 0.0831 0.1980 3,103.6064 Worker 0.6325 0.4245 6.9643 0.0194 2.2132 0.0125 2.2256 0.5869 0.0115 0.5984 1,983.9583 1,983.9583 0.0475 0.0448 1,998.4821 Vendor 0.0597 1.9602 0.7717 9.8300e- 0.3458 0.0114 0.3572 0.0996 0.0109 0.1105 1,058.5670 1,058.5670 0.0356 0.1533 1,105.1243 003
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.2099 2,555.2099 0.6079 2,570.4061 Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.2099 2,555.2099 0.6079 2,570.4061 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
I

Archit. Coating 104.3172 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
400.7997 400.7997 9.5900e0039.0400e0030.4471 2.5200e- 403.7338 003

0.4496 0.1186 2.3200e003Total 0.1278 0.0858 1.4069 3.9200e- 0.1209 003
400.7997 400.7997 9.5900e0039.0400e0030.4471 2.5200e- 403.7338 003

0.4496 0.1186 2.3200e003Worker 0.1278 0.0858 1.4069 3.9200e- 0.1209 003
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 104.5088 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e- 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 003
Off-Road 0.1917 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e- 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 003
Archit. Coating 104.3172 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
150.2999 150.2999 3.6000e0033.3900e0030.1677 9.4000e- 151.4002 004

0.1686 0.0445 8.7000e004Total 0.0479 0.0322 0.5276 1.4700e- 0.0453 003
150.2999 150.2999 3.6000e0033.3900e0030.1677 9.4000e- 151.4002 004

0.1686 0.0445 8.7000e004Worker 0.0479 0.0322 0.5276 1.4700e- 0.0453 003
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 2,207.5841 2,207.5841 0.7140 2,225.4336 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 2,207.5841 2,207.5841 0.7140 2,225.4336 Category lb/day lb/day I I
I I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

0.000751 0.003721

5.0 Energy Detail
Historical Energy Use: N
High Turnover (Sit Down 0.006448 0.011958 0.009209 0.000810 0.000503 0.024446 Restaurant)

0.542450 0.061470 0.185138 0.129299 0.023799

0.009209 0.000810 0.000503 0.024446 0.000751 0.003721

0.000751 0.003721
General Light Industry 0.542450 0.061470 0.185138 0.129299 0.023799 0.006448 0.011958 Enclosed Parking Structure 0.542450 0.061470 0.185138 0.129299 0.023799 0.006448 0.011958 0.009209 0.000810 0.000503 0.024446

0.009209 0.000810 0.000503 0.024446 0.000751 0.003721

SBUS MH
Apartments Mid Rise 0.542450 0.061470 0.185138 0.129299 0.023799 0.006448 0.011958 Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY

72.50 19.00 37 20 43

4.4 Fleet Mix

28.00 13.00 92 5 3
High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)

16.60 8.40 6.90 8.50

0.00 0.00 0 0 0
General Light Industry 16.60 8.40 6.90 59.00

19.20 40.60 86 11 3
Enclosed Parking Structure 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00
H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by
Apartments Mid Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20

4.3 Trip Type Information
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W
Total 9,947.06 10,629.35 12,416.28 16,120,299 16,120,299 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 9,086.58 9,914.40 11553.84 13,024,988 13,024,988 General Light Industry 243.04 97.51 245.00 985,425 985,425 Enclosed Parking Structure 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual VMT
Apartments Mid Rise 617.44 617.44 617.44 2,109,886 2,109,886

4.2 Trip Summary Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT
40,439.068
6 40,439.068
6 3.0595 1.9641 41,100.843
2 39.9088 0.2951 40.2039 10.6349 0.2743 10.9091
40,439.068
6 40,439.068
6 3.0595 1.9641 41,100.843
2 Unmitigated 26.3376 21.8355 197.6632 0.3901
Mitigated 26.3376 21.8355 197.6632 0.3901 39.9088 0.2951 40.2039 10.6349 0.2743 10.9091 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
400.7997 400.7997 9.5900e0039.0400e0030.4471 2.5200e- 403.7338 003

0.4496 0.1186 2.3200e003Total 0.1278 0.0858 1.4069 3.9200e- 0.1209 003
400.7997 400.7997 9.5900e0039.0400e0030.4471 2.5200e- 403.7338 003

0.4496 0.1186 2.3200e003Worker 0.1278 0.0858 1.4069 3.9200e- 0.1209 003
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 104.5088 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e- 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 003
Off-Road 0.1917 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e- 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 003 i
I ! ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; I ; ; ; ; ; I

I I I I I I I
I I
I I
l I I I I l I I l l l I I

Use Low VOC Paint - Non-Residential Exterior
Use only Natural Gas Hearths
6,910.7119

6.0 Area Detail

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
Use Low VOC Paint - Residential Interior
Use Low VOC Paint - Residential Exterior
Use Low VOC Paint - Non-Residential Interior

0.0344 0.4351 0.4351 0.4351 0.4351 6,869.8876 6,869.8876 0.1317 0.1260 6,013.4504 0.1153 0.1103 6,049.1854
Total 0.6297 5.6963 4.5989

0.3809 0.3809 0.3809 6,013.4504
285.3407
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)

51.1143 0.5512 5.0112 4.2094 0.0301 0.3809

0.0180 283.6551 283.6551 5.4400e0035.2000e0031.4200e0030.0180 0.0180 0.0180

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
General Light
Industry

2.41107 0.0260 0.2364 0.1986
Enclosed Parking 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Structure
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2.8600e- 0.0363 572.7820 572.7820 0.0110 0.0105
003

0.0363 0.0363 0.0363
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Apartments Mid
Rise

4.86865 0.0525 0.4487 0.1909
Fugitive Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
576.1858
6,910.7119
Mitigated
NaturalGas
Use
ROG NOx CO SO2

0.0344 0.4351 0.4351 0.4351 0.4351 6,869.8876 6,869.8876 0.1317 0.1260 6,013.4504 0.1153 0.1103 6,049.1854
Total 0.6297 5.6963 4.5989

0.3809 0.3809 0.3809 6,013.4504
285.3407
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
51114.3 0.5512 5.0112 4.2094 0.0301 0.3809

0.0180 283.6551 283.6551 5.4400e0035.2000e0031.4200e0030.0180 0.0180 0.0180

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
General Light
Industry
2411.07 0.0260 0.2364 0.1986

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
576.1858
Enclosed Parking
Structure
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2.8600e- 0.0363 572.7820 572.7820 0.0110 0.0105
003
Apartments Mid 0.0363 0.0363 0.0363
Rise
4868.65 0.0525 0.4487 0.1909
NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Unmitigated
NaturalGas
Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
NaturalGas 0.4351 0.4351 0.4351 0.4351 6,869.8876 6,869.8876 0.1317 0.1260 6,910.7119 Unmitigated

0.6297 5.6963 4.5989 0.0344

0.4351 0.4351 0.4351 0.4351 6,869.8876 6,869.8876 0.1317 0.1260 6,910.7119 CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.6297 5.6963 4.5989 0.0344
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
ROG NOx CO I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

User Defined Equipment
Load Factor Fuel Type
Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power
Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment

7.0 Water Detail

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

8.0 Waste Detail

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number
Total 6.4424 2.0472 12.0724 0.0128 0.2174 0.2174 0.2174 0.2174 0.0000 2,468.2911 2,468.2911 0.0665 0.0449 2,483.3287 Landscaping 0.3410 0.1296 11.2564 6.0000e- 0.0623 0.0623 0.0623 0.0623 20.2911 20.2911 0.0196 20.7815 004
Hearth 0.2244 1.9176 0.8160 0.0122 0.1550 0.1550 0.1550 0.1550 0.0000 2,448.0000 2,448.0000 0.0469 0.0449 2,462.5472 Consumer 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Products

5.3053
Architectural 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating

0.5716
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 10.1129 2.5910 45.4063 0.1216 5.6552 5.6552 5.6552 5.6552 802.6228 2,468.2911 3,270.9139 3.8186 0.0449 3,379.7540 Landscaping 0.3410 0.1296 11.2564 6.0000e- 0.0623 0.0623 0.0623 0.0623 20.2911 20.2911 0.0196 20.7815 004
Hearth 3.8949 2.4614 34.1499 0.1210 5.5929 5.5929 5.5929 5.5929 802.6228 2,448.0000 3,250.6228 3.7990 0.0449 3,358.9725 Consumer 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Products

5.3053
Architectural 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating

0.5716
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

6.2 Area by SubCategory
Unmitigated
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Unmitigated 10.1129 2.5910 45.4063 0.1216 5.6552 5.6552 5.6552 5.6552 802.6228 2,468.2911 3,270.9139 3.8186 0.0449 3,379.7540 Mitigated 6.4424 2.0472 12.0724 0.0128 0.2174 0.2174 0.2174 0.2174 0.0000 2,468.2911 2,468.2911 0.0665 0.0449 2,483.3287 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I
I
I
I
I

Equipment Type Number

11.0 Vegetation

0.0000 49,735.545
3 49,735.545
3 3.6559 7.2874 51,998.580
9 Maximum 104.6437 145.6467 46.5607 0.4580 32.4884 2.5166 35.0050 13.5507 2.3485 15.8992 2023 104.6437 16.9065 23.3431 0.0551 2.5589 0.7237 3.2826 0.6865 0.6809 1.3674 0.0000 5,484.5118 5,484.5118 0.7176 0.2011 5,561.7331

0.0000 49,735.545
3 49,735.545
3 3.6559 7.2874 51,998.580
9 2022 6.0735 145.6467 46.5607 0.4580 32.4884 2.5166 35.0050 13.5507 2.3485 15.8992 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2

2.0 Emissions Summary

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 4.09 4.54
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 5.44 4.54
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 6,045.00 6,908.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 4.91 4.54
tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 48,356.00
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 1,611.00 2,715.00
tblAreaMitigation UseLowVOCPaintParkingCheck False True tblFireplaces NumberWood 6.80 0.00
Vehicle Trips - Residential trips provided from traffic study. Light Industrial and Commercial trips used CalEEMod defaults.

Woodstoves - No wood fireplaces permitted.

Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation -
Area Mitigation -
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
Project Characteristics -
Land Use -
Trips and VMT - Trips conservatively calculated outside of CalEEMod. Haul truck trip numbers conservatively assuming 10 CY for demo and 14 CY site prep. The remaining construction trips are CalEEMod defaults Demolition - Grading -
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
390.98 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.033 N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.004
31 Climate Zone 9 Operational Year 2024
Utility Company Southern California Edison

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) Apartments Mid Rise 136.00 Dwelling Unit 3.58 136,000.00 389 Enclosed Parking Structure 272.00 Space 2.45 108,800.00 0 General Light Industry 49.00 1000sqft 1.12 49,000.00 0
High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 81.00 1000sqft 1.86 81,000.00 0 South Coast AQMD Air District, Winter

1.0 Project Characteristics

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 3/29/2022 2:13 PM
City of Covina MUOD Construction - South Coast AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied City of Covina MUOD Construction

I I I I

3 Grading Grading 5/13/2022 6/9/2022 5 20
20 2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 4/29/2022 5/12/2022 5 10 End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 4/1/2022 4/28/2022 5

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date

0.00 85.16 11.75 0.00 85.44 31.99 100.00 0.00 1.65 52.32 0.00 1.81 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

10.28 1.71 13.48 20.58
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Bio- CO2
PM10

0.0000 47,960.169
4 47,960.169
4 3.4190 2.2180 48,706.614
6 Total 32.0393 31.2097 214.0103 0.4197 39.9088 0.9478 40.8566 10.6349 0.9270 11.5618 38,621.990
7 38,621.990
7 3.2208 2.0472 39,312.574
1 Mobile 24.9672 23.4662 197.3390 0.3725 39.9088 0.2954 40.2042 10.6349 0.2745 10.9094 Energy 0.6297 5.6963 4.5989 0.0344 0.4351 0.4351 0.4351 0.4351 6,869.8876 6,869.8876 0.1317 0.1260 6,910.7119 Area 6.4424 2.0472 12.0724 0.0128 0.2174 0.2174 0.2174 0.2174 0.0000 2,468.2911 2,468.2911 0.0665 0.0449 2,483.3287 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
802.6228 47,960.169
4 48,762.792
2 7.1711 2.2180 49,603.039
9 Total 35.7099 31.7535 247.3442 0.5284 39.9088 6.3857 46.2944 10.6349 6.3648 16.9997 38,621.990
7 38,621.990
7 3.2208 2.0472 39,312.574
1 Mobile 24.9672 23.4662 197.3390 0.3725 39.9088 0.2954 40.2042 10.6349 0.2745 10.9094 Energy 0.6297 5.6963 4.5989 0.0344 0.4351 0.4351 0.4351 0.4351 6,869.8876 6,869.8876 0.1317 0.1260 6,910.7119 Area 10.1129 2.5910 45.4063 0.1216 5.6552 5.6552 5.6552 5.6552 802.6228 2,468.2911 3,270.9139 3.8186 0.0449 3,379.7540 Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

2.2 Overall Operational
Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

35.16 0.00 32.19 43.64 0.00 35.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Bio- CO2
PM10

0.00 0.0000 49,735.545
3 49,735.545
3 3.6559 7.2874 51,998.580
9 Maximum 104.6437 145.6467 46.5607 0.4580 20.1640 2.5166 22.6806 7.3377 2.3485 9.6862 2023 104.6437 16.9065 23.3431 0.0551 2.5589 0.7237 3.2826 0.6865 0.6809 1.3674 0.0000 5,484.5118 5,484.5118 0.7176 0.2011 5,561.7331

0.0000 49,735.545
3 49,735.545
3 3.6559 7.2874 51,998.580
9 2022 6.0735 145.6467 46.5607 0.4580 20.1640 2.5166 22.6806 7.3377 2.3485 9.6862 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I
I
I
I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I ! I I I

1.0524 3,773.0920
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
Total 2.6392 25.7194 20.5941 0.0388 17.4316 1.2427 18.6743 2.6393 1.1553 3.7946 3,746.7812 3,746.7812

0.0388 1.2427 1.2427 1.1553 1.1553 3,746.7812 3,746.7812 1.0524

0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 2.6392 25.7194 20.5941

0.0000 17.4316 2.6393 0.0000 2.6393
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 17.4316
3,773.0920
Fugitive Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Water Exposed Area

3.2 Demolition - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2

14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Architectural Coating 1 40.00 0.00 0.00
Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70

14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Building Construction 9 198.00 54.00 0.00
Grading 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70

14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 6,908.00
Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 2,715.00 14.70
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40
Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38
Load Factor
Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 15
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 20
Acres of Paving: 2.45
Residential Indoor: 275,400; Residential Outdoor: 91,800; Non-Residential Indoor: 195,000; Non-Residential Outdoor: 65,000; Striped Parking Area:

OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power 20 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 5/26/2023 6/22/2023 5 20 5 Paving Paving 4/28/2023 5/25/2023 5
4 Building Construction Building Construction 6/10/2022 4/27/2023 5 230 I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
Total 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 20.2039 1.6126 21.8164 10.1853 1.4836 11.6688 3,686.0619 3,686.0619 1.1922 3,715.8655 Off-Road 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 1.6126 1.6126 1.4836 1.4836 3,686.0619 3,686.0619 1.1922 3,715.8655 Fugitive Dust 20.2039 0.0000 20.2039 10.1853 0.0000 10.1853 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.3 Site Preparation - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.6121 22.1503 5.6744 0.0836 2.5422 0.1784 2.7206 0.6953 0.1707 0.8660 9,160.3530 9,160.3530 0.4873 1.4350 9,600.1725 145.3958 145.3958 4.0600e0033.8900e0030.1677 1.0000e- 146.6576 003

0.1687 0.0445 9.2000e004Worker 0.0544 0.0398 0.5176 1.4300e- 0.0454 003
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.5577 22.1106 5.1568 0.0822 2.3745 0.1774 2.5519 0.6509 0.1697 0.8206 9,014.9572 9,014.9572 0.4832 1.4311 9,453.5149 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 2.6392 25.7194 20.5941 0.0388 6.7983 1.2427 8.0410 1.0293 1.1553 2.1846 0.0000 3,746.7812 3,746.7812 1.0524 3,773.0920 Off-Road 2.6392 25.7194 20.5941 0.0388 1.2427 1.2427 1.1553 1.1553 0.0000 3,746.7812 3,746.7812 1.0524 3,773.0920 Fugitive Dust 6.7983 0.0000 6.7983 1.0293 0.0000 1.0293 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.6121 22.1503 5.6744 0.0836 2.5422 0.1784 2.7206 0.6953 0.1707 0.8660 9,160.3530 9,160.3530 0.4873 1.4350 9,600.1725 145.3958 145.3958 4.0600e0033.8900e0030.1677 1.0000e- 146.6576 003

0.1687 0.0445 9.2000e004Worker 0.0544 0.0398 0.5176 1.4300e- 0.0454 003
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2.3745 0.1774 2.5519 0.6509 0.1697 0.8206 9,014.9572 9,014.9572 0.4832 1.4311 9,453.5149 CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.5577 22.1106 5.1568 0.0822
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 1.9486 20.8551 15.2727 0.0297 7.0826 0.9409 8.0234 3.4247 0.8656 4.2903 2,872.0464 2,872.0464 0.9289 2,895.2684 Off-Road 1.9486 20.8551 15.2727 0.0297 0.9409 0.9409 0.8656 0.8656 2,872.0464 2,872.0464 0.9289 2,895.2684 Fugitive Dust 7.0826 0.0000 7.0826 3.4247 0.0000 3.4247 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.4 Grading - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
46,049.483
4 46,049.483
4 2.4638 7.2874 48,282.715
4 Total 2.9034 112.5631 26.8629 0.4200 12.2845 0.9040 13.1885 3.3655 0.8649 4.2304 174.4750 174.4750 4.8700e0034.6700e0030.2012 1.2000e- 175.9891 003

0.2024 0.0534 1.1100e003Worker 0.0652 0.0477 0.6211 1.7200e- 0.0545 003
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 45,875.008
5 45,875.008
5 2.4589 7.2827 48,106.726
3 Hauling 2.8382 112.5154 26.2418 0.4183 12.0833 0.9028 12.9861 3.3121 0.8638 4.1759 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 7.8795 1.6126 9.4921 3.9723 1.4836 5.4558 0.0000 3,686.0619 3,686.0619 1.1922 3,715.8655 Off-Road 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 1.6126 1.6126 1.4836 1.4836 0.0000 3,686.0619 3,686.0619 1.1922 3,715.8655 Fugitive Dust 7.8795 0.0000 7.8795 3.9723 0.0000 3.9723 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
46,049.483
4 46,049.483
4 2.4638 7.2874 48,282.715
4 Total 2.9034 112.5631 26.8629 0.4200 12.2845 0.9040 13.1885 3.3655 0.8649 4.2304 174.4750 174.4750 4.8700e0034.6700e0030.2012 1.2000e- 175.9891 003

0.2024 0.0534 1.1100e003Worker 0.0652 0.0477 0.6211 1.7200e- 0.0545 003
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 45,875.008
5 45,875.008
5 2.4589 7.2827 48,106.726
3 Hauling 2.8382 112.5154 26.2418 0.4183 12.0833 0.9028 12.9861 3.3121 0.8638 4.1759 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I

Worker 0.7174 0.5248 6.8321 0.0189 2.2132 0.0132 2.2264 0.5869 0.0122 0.5991 1,919.2247 1,919.2247 0.0536 0.0514 1,935.8803 Vendor 0.0967 2.6224 0.8925 0.0103 0.3458 0.0264 0.3721 0.0996 0.0252 0.1248 1,111.1705 1,111.1705 0.0371 0.1612 1,160.1428 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.3336 2,554.3336 0.6120 2,569.6322 Off-Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.3336 2,554.3336 0.6120 2,569.6322 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
145.3958 145.3958 4.0600e0033.8900e0030.1677 1.0000e- 146.6576 003

0.1687 0.0445 9.2000e004Total 0.0544 0.0398 0.5176 1.4300e- 0.0454 003
145.3958 145.3958 4.0600e0033.8900e0030.1677 1.0000e- 146.6576 003

0.1687 0.0445 9.2000e004Worker 0.0544 0.0398 0.5176 1.4300e- 0.0454 003
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 1.9486 20.8551 15.2727 0.0297 2.7622 0.9409 3.7031 1.3357 0.8656 2.2012 0.0000 2,872.0464 2,872.0464 0.9289 2,895.2684 Off-Road 1.9486 20.8551 15.2727 0.0297 0.9409 0.9409 0.8656 0.8656 0.0000 2,872.0464 2,872.0464 0.9289 2,895.2684 Fugitive Dust 2.7622 0.0000 2.7622 1.3357 0.0000 1.3357 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
145.3958 145.3958 4.0600e0033.8900e0030.1677 1.0000e- 146.6576 003

0.1687 0.0445 9.2000e004Total 0.0544 0.0398 0.5176 1.4300e- 0.0454 003
145.3958 145.3958 4.0600e0033.8900e0030.1677 1.0000e- 146.6576 003

0.1687 0.0445 9.2000e004Worker 0.0544 0.0398 0.5176 1.4300e- 0.0454 003
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Mitigated Construction On-Site
Total 0.7248 2.5216 7.0991 0.0281 2.5589 0.0239 2.5829 0.6865 0.0225 0.7090 2,929.3019 2,929.3019 0.0836 0.2011 2,991.3270 Worker 0.6677 0.4642 6.3025 0.0183 2.2132 0.0125 2.2256 0.5869 0.0115 0.5984 1,868.8210 1,868.8210 0.0482 0.0475 1,884.1706 Vendor 0.0572 2.0574 0.7966 9.8500e- 0.3458 0.0115 0.3573 0.0996 0.0110 0.1105 1,060.4809 1,060.4809 0.0354 0.1537 1,107.1564 003
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.2099 2,555.2099 0.6079 2,570.4061 Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.2099 2,555.2099 0.6079 2,570.4061 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.8141 3.1472 7.7246 0.0292 2.5590 0.0396 2.5985 0.6865 0.0374 0.7239 3,030.3952 3,030.3952 0.0906 0.2126 3,096.0231 Worker 0.7174 0.5248 6.8321 0.0189 2.2132 0.0132 2.2264 0.5869 0.0122 0.5991 1,919.2247 1,919.2247 0.0536 0.0514 1,935.8803 Vendor 0.0967 2.6224 0.8925 0.0103 0.3458 0.0264 0.3721 0.0996 0.0252 0.1248 1,111.1705 1,111.1705 0.0371 0.1612 1,160.1428 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.3336 2,554.3336 0.6120 2,569.6322 Off-Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.3336 2,554.3336 0.6120 2,569.6322 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.8141 3.1472 7.7246 0.0292 2.5590 0.0396 2.5985 0.6865 0.0374 0.7239 3,030.3952 3,030.3952 0.0906 0.2126 3,096.0231 I

PM10 Total Fugitive Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
141.5774 141.5774 3.6500e0033.6000e0030.1677 9.4000e- 142.7402 004

0.1686 0.0445 8.7000e004Total 0.0506 0.0352 0.4775 1.3800e- 0.0453 003
141.5774 141.5774 3.6500e0033.6000e0030.1677 9.4000e- 142.7402 004

0.1686 0.0445 8.7000e004Worker 0.0506 0.0352 0.4775 1.3800e- 0.0453 003
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.5841 2,207.5841 0.7140 2,225.4336 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.5841 2,207.5841 0.7140 2,225.4336 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.6 Paving - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.7248 2.5216 7.0991 0.0281 2.5589 0.0239 2.5829 0.6865 0.0225 0.7090 2,929.3019 2,929.3019 0.0836 0.2011 2,991.3270 Worker 0.6677 0.4642 6.3025 0.0183 2.2132 0.0125 2.2256 0.5869 0.0115 0.5984 1,868.8210 1,868.8210 0.0482 0.0475 1,884.1706 Vendor 0.0572 2.0574 0.7966 9.8500e- 0.3458 0.0115 0.3573 0.0996 0.0110 0.1105 1,060.4809 1,060.4809 0.0354 0.1537 1,107.1564 003
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.2099 2,555.2099 0.6079 2,570.4061 Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.2099 2,555.2099 0.6079 2,570.4061 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
I

Archit. Coating 104.3172 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
377.5396 377.5396 9.7300e0039.5900e0030.4471 2.5200e- 380.6405 003

0.4496 0.1186 2.3200e003Total 0.1349 0.0938 1.2732 3.6900e- 0.1209 003
377.5396 377.5396 9.7300e0039.5900e0030.4471 2.5200e- 380.6405 003

0.4496 0.1186 2.3200e003Worker 0.1349 0.0938 1.2732 3.6900e- 0.1209 003
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 104.5088 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e- 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 003
Off-Road 0.1917 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e- 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 003
Archit. Coating 104.3172 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
141.5774 141.5774 3.6500e0033.6000e0030.1677 9.4000e- 142.7402 004

0.1686 0.0445 8.7000e004Total 0.0506 0.0352 0.4775 1.3800e- 0.0453 003
141.5774 141.5774 3.6500e0033.6000e0030.1677 9.4000e- 142.7402 004

0.1686 0.0445 8.7000e004Worker 0.0506 0.0352 0.4775 1.3800e- 0.0453 003
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 2,207.5841 2,207.5841 0.7140 2,225.4336 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 2,207.5841 2,207.5841 0.7140 2,225.4336 Category lb/day lb/day I I
I I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

0.000751 0.003721

5.0 Energy Detail
Historical Energy Use: N
High Turnover (Sit Down 0.006448 0.011958 0.009209 0.000810 0.000503 0.024446 Restaurant)

0.542450 0.061470 0.185138 0.129299 0.023799

0.009209 0.000810 0.000503 0.024446 0.000751 0.003721

0.000751 0.003721
General Light Industry 0.542450 0.061470 0.185138 0.129299 0.023799 0.006448 0.011958 Enclosed Parking Structure 0.542450 0.061470 0.185138 0.129299 0.023799 0.006448 0.011958 0.009209 0.000810 0.000503 0.024446

0.009209 0.000810 0.000503 0.024446 0.000751 0.003721

SBUS MH
Apartments Mid Rise 0.542450 0.061470 0.185138 0.129299 0.023799 0.006448 0.011958 Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY

72.50 19.00 37 20 43

4.4 Fleet Mix

28.00 13.00 92 5 3
High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)

16.60 8.40 6.90 8.50

0.00 0.00 0 0 0
General Light Industry 16.60 8.40 6.90 59.00

19.20 40.60 86 11 3
Enclosed Parking Structure 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00
H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by
Apartments Mid Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20

4.3 Trip Type Information
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W
Total 9,947.06 10,629.35 12,416.28 16,120,299 16,120,299 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 9,086.58 9,914.40 11553.84 13,024,988 13,024,988 General Light Industry 243.04 97.51 245.00 985,425 985,425 Enclosed Parking Structure 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual VMT
Apartments Mid Rise 617.44 617.44 617.44 2,109,886 2,109,886

4.2 Trip Summary Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT
38,621.990
7 38,621.990
7 3.2208 2.0472 39,312.574
1 39.9088 0.2954 40.2042 10.6349 0.2745 10.9094
38,621.990
7 38,621.990
7 3.2208 2.0472 39,312.574
1 Unmitigated 24.9672 23.4662 197.3390 0.3725
Mitigated 24.9672 23.4662 197.3390 0.3725 39.9088 0.2954 40.2042 10.6349 0.2745 10.9094 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
377.5396 377.5396 9.7300e0039.5900e0030.4471 2.5200e- 380.6405 003

0.4496 0.1186 2.3200e003Total 0.1349 0.0938 1.2732 3.6900e- 0.1209 003
377.5396 377.5396 9.7300e0039.5900e0030.4471 2.5200e- 380.6405 003

0.4496 0.1186 2.3200e003Worker 0.1349 0.0938 1.2732 3.6900e- 0.1209 003
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 104.5088 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e- 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 003
Off-Road 0.1917 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e- 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 003 i
I ! ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; I ; ; ; ; ; I

I I I I I I I
I I
I I
l I I I I l I I l l l I I

Use Low VOC Paint - Non-Residential Exterior
Use only Natural Gas Hearths
6,910.7119

6.0 Area Detail

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
Use Low VOC Paint - Residential Interior
Use Low VOC Paint - Residential Exterior
Use Low VOC Paint - Non-Residential Interior

0.0344 0.4351 0.4351 0.4351 0.4351 6,869.8876 6,869.8876 0.1317 0.1260 6,013.4504 0.1153 0.1103 6,049.1854
Total 0.6297 5.6963 4.5989

0.3809 0.3809 0.3809 6,013.4504
285.3407
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)

51.1143 0.5512 5.0112 4.2094 0.0301 0.3809

0.0180 283.6551 283.6551 5.4400e0035.2000e0031.4200e0030.0180 0.0180 0.0180

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
General Light
Industry

2.41107 0.0260 0.2364 0.1986
Enclosed Parking 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Structure
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2.8600e- 0.0363 572.7820 572.7820 0.0110 0.0105
003

0.0363 0.0363 0.0363
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Apartments Mid
Rise

4.86865 0.0525 0.4487 0.1909
Fugitive Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total
576.1858
6,910.7119
Mitigated
NaturalGas
Use
ROG NOx CO SO2

0.0344 0.4351 0.4351 0.4351 0.4351 6,869.8876 6,869.8876 0.1317 0.1260 6,013.4504 0.1153 0.1103 6,049.1854
Total 0.6297 5.6963 4.5989

0.3809 0.3809 0.3809 6,013.4504
285.3407
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
51114.3 0.5512 5.0112 4.2094 0.0301 0.3809

0.0180 283.6551 283.6551 5.4400e0035.2000e0031.4200e0030.0180 0.0180 0.0180

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
General Light
Industry
2411.07 0.0260 0.2364 0.1986

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
576.1858
Enclosed Parking
Structure
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2.8600e- 0.0363 572.7820 572.7820 0.0110 0.0105
003
Apartments Mid 0.0363 0.0363 0.0363
Rise
4868.65 0.0525 0.4487 0.1909
NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Unmitigated
NaturalGas
Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
NaturalGas 0.4351 0.4351 0.4351 0.4351 6,869.8876 6,869.8876 0.1317 0.1260 6,910.7119 Unmitigated

0.6297 5.6963 4.5989 0.0344

0.4351 0.4351 0.4351 0.4351 6,869.8876 6,869.8876 0.1317 0.1260 6,910.7119 CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.6297 5.6963 4.5989 0.0344
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
ROG NOx CO I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

User Defined Equipment
Load Factor Fuel Type
Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power
Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment

7.0 Water Detail

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

8.0 Waste Detail

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number
Total 6.4424 2.0472 12.0724 0.0128 0.2174 0.2174 0.2174 0.2174 0.0000 2,468.2911 2,468.2911 0.0665 0.0449 2,483.3287 Landscaping 0.3410 0.1296 11.2564 6.0000e- 0.0623 0.0623 0.0623 0.0623 20.2911 20.2911 0.0196 20.7815 004
Hearth 0.2244 1.9176 0.8160 0.0122 0.1550 0.1550 0.1550 0.1550 0.0000 2,448.0000 2,448.0000 0.0469 0.0449 2,462.5472 Consumer 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Products

5.3053
Architectural 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating

0.5716
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 10.1129 2.5910 45.4063 0.1216 5.6552 5.6552 5.6552 5.6552 802.6228 2,468.2911 3,270.9139 3.8186 0.0449 3,379.7540 Landscaping 0.3410 0.1296 11.2564 6.0000e- 0.0623 0.0623 0.0623 0.0623 20.2911 20.2911 0.0196 20.7815 004
Hearth 3.8949 2.4614 34.1499 0.1210 5.5929 5.5929 5.5929 5.5929 802.6228 2,448.0000 3,250.6228 3.7990 0.0449 3,358.9725 Consumer 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Products

5.3053
Architectural 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating

0.5716
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

6.2 Area by SubCategory
Unmitigated
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Unmitigated 10.1129 2.5910 45.4063 0.1216 5.6552 5.6552 5.6552 5.6552 802.6228 2,468.2911 3,270.9139 3.8186 0.0449 3,379.7540 Mitigated 6.4424 2.0472 12.0724 0.0128 0.2174 0.2174 0.2174 0.2174 0.0000 2,468.2911 2,468.2911 0.0665 0.0449 2,483.3287 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I
I
I
I
I

Equipment Type Number

11.0 Vegetation

Maximum 1.1516 2.7947 2.4230 7.9400e- 0.6167 0.0982 0.7148 0.1847 0.0920 0.2767 0.0000 741.8276 741.8276 0.0856 0.0602 761.9163 003

0.0000 237.3786 237.3786 0.0331 7.8100e0032023 1.1516 0.8268 1.1692 2.6300e- 0.1116 0.0362 0.1478 0.0300 0.0340 0.0640 240.5326 003
2022 0.2633 2.7947 2.4230 7.9400e- 0.6167 0.0982 0.7148 0.1847 0.0920 0.2767 0.0000 741.8276 741.8276 0.0856 0.0602 761.9163 003
NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2

2.0 Emissions Summary

2.1 Overall Construction
Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 4.09 4.54
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 5.44 4.54
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 6,045.00 6,908.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 4.91 4.54
tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 48,356.00
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 1,611.00 2,715.00
tblAreaMitigation UseLowVOCPaintParkingCheck False True tblFireplaces NumberWood 6.80 0.00
Vehicle Trips - Residential trips provided from traffic study. Light Industrial and Commercial trips used CalEEMod defaults.

Woodstoves - No wood fireplaces permitted.

Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation -
Area Mitigation -
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
Project Characteristics -
Land Use -
Trips and VMT - Trips conservatively calculated outside of CalEEMod. Haul truck trip numbers conservatively assuming 10 CY for demo and 14 CY site prep. The remaining construction trips are CalEEMod defaults Demolition -
Grading -
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
390.98 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.033 N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.004
31 Climate Zone 9 Operational Year 2024
Utility Company Southern California Edison

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) Apartments Mid Rise 136.00 Dwelling Unit 3.58 136,000.00 389 Enclosed Parking Structure 272.00 Space 2.45 108,800.00 0 General Light Industry 49.00 1000sqft 1.12 49,000.00 0
High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 81.00 1000sqft 1.86 81,000.00 0 South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual

1.0 Project Characteristics

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 3/29/2022 2:16 PM
City of Covina MUOD Construction - South Coast AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied City of Covina MUOD Construction

I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Total 4.9807 4.7173 32.7994 0.0648 6.0687 0.1347 6.2034 1.6196 0.1315 1.7510 234.902 7,674.56 7,909.46 15.0585 0.3528 8,391.06 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 14.2061 117.5018 131.7079 1.469 0.0357 179.0586 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 220.6958 0 220.6958 13.0428 0 546.7646 Mobile 3.7478 3.6376 30.5429 0.0583 6.0687 0.0456 6.1142 1.6196 0.0423 1.6619 0 5,479.52 5,479.52 0.4454 0.2865 5,576.03 Energy 0.1149 1.0396 0.8393 6.2700e- 0.0794 0.0794 0.0794 0.0794 0 2,047.47 2,047.47 0.0986 0.0302 2,058.93 003

9.7300e- 0 30.0608 30.0608 2.76E-03 5.10E-04 30.2814
003

9.7300e0039.7300e003Area 1.1180 0.0402 1.4173 2.3000e- 9.7300e-003 004
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 5.0266 4.7241 33.2161 0.0661 6.0687 0.2027 6.2713 1.6196 0.1994 1.8190 244.0036 7,674.5593 7,918.5629 15.1011 0.3528 8,401.2260 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 14.2061 117.5018 131.7079 1.4690 0.0357 179.0586 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 220.6958 0.0000 220.6958 13.0428 0.0000 546.7646 Mobile 3.7478 3.6376 30.5429 0.0583 6.0687 0.0456 6.1142 1.6196 0.0423 1.6619 0.0000 5,479.5218 5,479.5218 0.4454 0.2865 5,576.0273 Energy 0.1149 1.0396 0.8393 6.2700e- 0.0794 0.0794 0.0794 0.0794 0.0000 2,047.4749 2,047.4749 0.0986 0.0302 2,058.9288 003

9.1016 30.0608 39.1624 0.0453 5.1000e004Area 1.1639 0.0470 1.8339 1.5900e- 0.0777 0.0777 0.0777 0.0777 40.4467 003
CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total
Highest 1.6244 1.6244

2.2 Overall Operational
4 1-1-2023 3-31-2023 0.6173 0.6173
5 4-1-2023 6-30-2023 1.3568 1.3568
2 7-1-2022 9-30-2022 0.6931 0.6931
3 10-1-2022 12-31-2022 0.6993 0.6993
Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 4-1-2022 6-30-2022 1.6244 1.6244

29.00 0.00 24.48 31.70 0.00 19.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2
PM10
Maximum 1.1516 2.7947 2.4230 7.9400e- 0.4055 0.0982 0.5037 0.1167 0.0920 0.2086 0 741.8273 741.8273 0.0856 0.0602 761.916 003
2023 1.1516 0.8268 1.1692 2.6300e- 0.1116 0.0362 0.1478 0.0300 0.0340 0.0640 0 237.3784 237.3784 0.0331 7.81E-03 240.5324 003
2022 0.2633 2.7947 2.4230 7.9400e- 0.4055 0.0982 0.5037 0.1167 0.0920 0.2086 0 741.8273 741.8273 0.0856 0.0602 761.916 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I
I
I
I

Fugitive Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Water Exposed Area

3.2 Demolition - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2

14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Architectural Coating 1 40.00 0.00 0.00
Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70

14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Building Construction 9 198.00 54.00 0.00
Grading 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70

14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 6,908.00
Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 2,715.00 14.70
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40
Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38
Load Factor
Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 15
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 20
Acres of Paving: 2.45
Residential Indoor: 275,400; Residential Outdoor: 91,800; Non-Residential Indoor: 195,000; Non-Residential Outdoor: 65,000; Striped Parking Area: 6,528

OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power 20 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 5/26/2023 6/22/2023 5 20 5 Paving Paving 4/28/2023 5/25/2023 5
20 4 Building Construction Building Construction 6/10/2022 4/27/2023 5 230 3 Grading Grading 5/13/2022 6/9/2022 5
20 2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 4/29/2022 5/12/2022 5 10 End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 4/1/2022 4/28/2022 5

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date

0.00 33.54 1.08 0.00 34.08 3.74 3.73 0.00 0.11 0.28 0.00 0.12 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent Reduction 0.91 0.14 1.25 2.06
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Bio- CO2
PM10

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I

Fugitive Dust 0.1010 0.0000 0.1010 0.0509 0.0000 0.0509 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.3 Site Preparation - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

0.0000 83.1041 83.1041 4.4300e0030.0250 1.7800e- 0.0130 87.0935 003

0.0268 6.8600e0031.7100e003Total 6.1700e- 8.5600e-003 003

0.2235 0.0563 8.3000e004

0.0000 1.3393 1.3393 4.0000e0054.0000e0051.6500e- 1.3509 003

1.0000e0051.6600e0034.4000e0041.0000e005Worker 5.0000e- 4.5000e-004 004

4.1000e0045.3200e0031.0000e005
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 81.7648 81.7648 4.3900e0030.0234 1.7700e- 0.0130 85.7427 003

0.0251 6.4200e0031.7000e003Hauling 5.6700e- 8.1100e-003 003

0.2231 0.0510 8.2000e004
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

0.0000 33.9902 33.9902 9.5500e003Total 0.0264 0.2572 0.2059 3.9000e- 0.0680 0.0124 0.0804 0.0103 0.0116 0.0218 0.0000 34.2289 004

0.0000 33.9902 33.9902 9.5500e003Off-Road 0.0264 0.2572 0.2059 3.9000e- 0.0124 0.0124 0.0116 0.0116 0.0000 34.2289 004
Fugitive Dust 0.0680 0.0000 0.0680 0.0103 0.0000 0.0103 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

0.0000 83.1041 83.1041 4.4300e0030.0250 1.7800e- 0.0130 87.0935 003

0.0268 6.8600e0031.7100e003Total 6.1700e- 8.5600e-003 003

0.2235 0.0563 8.3000e004

0.0000 1.3393 1.3393 4.0000e0054.0000e0051.6500e- 1.3509 003

1.0000e0051.6600e0034.4000e0041.0000e005Worker 5.0000e- 4.5000e-004 004

4.1000e0045.3200e0031.0000e005
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0124 0.1868

0.0000 81.7648 81.7648 4.3900e0030.0234 1.7700e- 0.0130 85.7427 003

0.0251 6.4200e0031.7000e0038.1100e-003
CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 5.6700e0030.2231 0.0510 8.2000e004
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O PM10

0.0116

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5

9.5500e0030.0000 34.2289
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO
Total 0.0264 0.2572 0.2059 3.9000e- 0.0264 0.0116 0.0379 0.0000 33.9902 33.9902 004

0.1743
Off-Road 0.0264 0.2572 0.2059

0.0000 0.1743 0.0264 0.0000 0.0264 0.0000
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.1743

0.0116 0.0000 33.9902 33.9902 9.5500e- 34.2289
003

3.9000e- 0.0000
004

0.0124 0.0124
I I
I I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

0.0000 26.0548 26.0548 8.4300e003

0.0708 9.4100e- 0.0000 26.2654
003

0.0802 0.0343 8.6600e003Total 0.0195 0.2086 0.1527 3.0000e- 0.0429 004

0.0000 26.0548 26.0548 8.4300e0039.4100e- 0.0000 26.2654 003

9.4100e0038.6600e003Off-Road 0.0195 0.2086 0.1527 3.0000e- 8.6600e-003 004
Fugitive Dust 0.0708 0.0000 0.0708 0.0343 0.0000 0.0343 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.4 Grading - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

0.0604 4.5200e- 0.0000 208.8446 208.8446 0.0112 0.0331 218.9727 003

0.0650 0.0166 4.3200e003Total 0.0147 0.5679 0.1330 2.1000e- 0.0209 003

0.0000 0.8036 0.8036 2.0000e0052.0000e0059.9000e- 0.8105 004

1.0000e0059.9000e0042.6000e0041.0000e005Worker 3.0000e- 2.7000e-004 004

2.4000e0043.1900e0031.0000e005
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0595 4.5100e- 0.0000 208.0411 208.0411 0.0112 0.0330 218.1622 003

0.0640 0.0163 4.3100e003Hauling 0.0144 0.5677 0.1298 2.0900e- 0.0206 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

0.0000 16.7197 16.7197 5.4100e0030.0394 8.0600e- 0.0000 16.8549 003

0.0475 0.0199 7.4200e003Total 0.0159 0.1654 0.0985 1.9000e- 0.0273 004

0.0000 16.7197 16.7197 5.4100e0038.0600e- 0.0000 16.8549 003

8.0600e0037.4200e003Off-Road 0.0159 0.1654 0.0985 1.9000e- 7.4200e-003 004
Fugitive Dust 0.0394 0.0000 0.0394 0.0199 0.0000 0.0199 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

0.0604 4.5200e- 0.0000 208.8446 208.8446 0.0112 0.0331 218.9727 003

0.0650 0.0166 4.3200e003Total 0.0147 0.5679 0.1330 2.1000e- 0.0209 003

0.0000 0.8036 0.8036 2.0000e0052.0000e0059.9000e- 0.8105 004

1.0000e0059.9000e0042.6000e0041.0000e005Worker 3.0000e- 2.7000e-004 004

2.4000e0043.1900e0031.0000e005
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0595 4.5100e- 0.0000 208.0411 208.0411 0.0112 0.0330 218.1622 003

0.0640 0.0163 4.3100e003Hauling 0.0144 0.5677 0.1298 2.0900e- 0.0206 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

0.0000 16.7197 16.7197 5.4100e0030.1010 8.0600e- 0.0000 16.8549 003

0.1091 0.0509 7.4200e003Total 0.0159 0.1654 0.0985 1.9000e- 0.0584 004

0.0000 16.7197 16.7197 5.4100e0038.0600e- 0.0000 16.8549 003

8.0600e0037.4200e003Off-Road 0.0159 0.1654 0.0985 1.9000e- 7.4200e-003 004 I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
Total 0.1246 1.1399 1.1945 1.9700e- 0.0591 0.0591 0.0556 0.0556 0.0000 169.1594 169.1594 0.0405 0.0000 170.1726 003
Off-Road 0.1246 1.1399 1.1945 1.9700e- 0.0591 0.0591 0.0556 0.0556 0.0000 169.1594 169.1594 0.0405 0.0000 170.1726 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

0.0000 1.3393 1.3393 4.0000e0054.0000e0051.6500e- 1.3509 003

1.0000e0051.6600e0034.4000e0041.0000e005Total 5.0000e- 4.5000e-004 004

4.1000e0045.3200e0031.0000e005

0.0000 1.3393 1.3393 4.0000e0054.0000e0051.6500e- 1.3509 003

1.0000e0051.6600e0034.4000e0041.0000e005Worker 5.0000e- 4.5000e-004 004

4.1000e0045.3200e0031.0000e005
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

0.0000 26.0547 26.0547 8.4300e0030.0276 9.4100e- 0.0000 26.2654 003

0.0370 0.0134 8.6600e003Total 0.0195 0.2086 0.1527 3.0000e- 0.0220 004

0.0000 26.0547 26.0547 8.4300e0039.4100e- 0.0000 26.2654 003

9.4100e0038.6600e003Off-Road 0.0195 0.2086 0.1527 3.0000e- 8.6600e-003 004
Fugitive Dust 0.0276 0.0000 0.0276 0.0134 0.0000 0.0134 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

0.0000 1.3393 1.3393 4.0000e0054.0000e0051.6500e- 1.3509 003

1.0000e0051.6600e0034.4000e0041.0000e005Total 5.0000e- 4.5000e-004 004

4.1000e0045.3200e0031.0000e005

0.0000 1.3393 1.3393 4.0000e0054.0000e0051.6500e- 1.3509 003

1.0000e0051.6600e0034.4000e0041.0000e005Worker 5.0000e- 4.5000e-004 004

4.1000e0045.3200e0031.0000e005
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.0661 0.6042 0.6823 1.1300e- 0.0294 0.0294 0.0277 0.0277 0.0000 97.3580 97.3580 0.0232 0.0000 97.9370 003
Off-Road 0.0661 0.6042 0.6823 1.1300e- 0.0294 0.0294 0.0277 0.0277 0.0000 97.3580 97.3580 0.0232 0.0000 97.9370 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

0.0000 202.6155 202.6155 6.0100e0030.1834 2.8900e- 0.0141 206.9773 003

0.1863 0.0493 2.7300e003Total 0.0557 0.2317 0.5767 2.1500e- 0.0520 003

0.0000 129.0501 129.0501 3.5500e0033.4600e0030.1586 9.7000e- 130.1693 004

0.1595 0.0421 8.9000e004Worker 0.0485 0.0392 0.5128 1.4000e- 0.0430 003

0.0000 73.5655 73.5655 2.4600e0030.0249 1.9200e- 0.0107 76.8080 003

0.0268 7.1700e0031.8400e003Vendor 7.1100e- 9.0100e-003 003

0.1925 0.0639 7.5000e004
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.1246 1.1399 1.1945 1.9700e- 0.0591 0.0591 0.0556 0.0556 0.0000 169.1592 169.1592 0.0405 0.0000 170.1724 003
Off-Road 0.1246 1.1399 1.1945 1.9700e- 0.0591 0.0591 0.0556 0.0556 0.0000 169.1592 169.1592 0.0405 0.0000 170.1724 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

0.0000 202.6155 202.6155 6.0100e0030.1834 2.8900e- 0.0141 206.9773 003

0.1863 0.0493 2.7300e003Total 0.0557 0.2317 0.5767 2.1500e- 0.0520 003

0.0000 129.0501 129.0501 3.5500e0033.4600e0030.1586 9.7000e- 130.1693 004

0.1595 0.0421 8.9000e004Worker 0.0485 0.0392 0.5128 1.4000e- 0.0430 003

0.0000 73.5655 73.5655 2.4600e0030.0249 1.9200e- 0.0107 76.8080 003

0.0268 7.1700e0031.8400e003Vendor 7.1100e- 9.0100e-003 003

0.1925 0.0639 7.5000e004
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
I

0.0000 1.3040 1.3040 3.0000e005

3.0000e0051.6500e- 1.3147
003

1.0000e0051.6600e0034.4000e0041.0000e005Worker 4.7000e- 4.5000e-004 004

3.6000e0044.9100e0031.0000e005
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

0.0000 20.0269 20.0269 6.4800e0035.1000e- 0.0000 20.1888 003

5.1000e0034.6900e003Total 0.0103 0.1019 0.1458 2.3000e- 4.6900e-003 004
Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 20.0269 20.0269 6.4800e0035.1000e- 0.0000 20.1888 003

5.1000e0034.6900e003Off-Road 0.0103 0.1019 0.1458 2.3000e- 4.6900e-003 004
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.6 Paving - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

0.0000 112.6591 112.6591 3.1900e0037.6900e0030.1055 1.0000e- 115.0290 003

0.1065 0.0284 9.4000e004Total 0.0284 0.1063 0.3050 1.1900e- 0.0293 003

0.0000 72.2951 72.2951 1.8400e0031.8400e0030.0912 5.2000e- 72.8884 004

0.0918 0.0242 4.8000e004Worker 0.0259 0.0199 0.2721 7.8000e- 0.0247 004

0.0000 40.3640 40.3640 1.3500e0035.8500e0030.0143 4.8000e- 42.1406 004

0.0148 4.1300e0034.6000e004Vendor 2.4500e- 4.5900e-003 003

0.0864 0.0329 4.1000e004
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Total 0.0661 0.6042 0.6823 1.1300e- 0.0294 0.0294 0.0277 0.0277 0.0000 97.3579 97.3579 0.0232 0.0000 97.9369 003
Off-Road 0.0661 0.6042 0.6823 1.1300e- 0.0294 0.0294 0.0277 0.0277 0.0000 97.3579 97.3579 0.0232 0.0000 97.9369 003
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

0.0000 112.6591 112.6591 3.1900e0037.6900e0030.1055 1.0000e- 115.0290 003

0.1065 0.0284 9.4000e004Total 0.0284 0.1063 0.3050 1.1900e- 0.0293 003

0.0000 72.2951 72.2951 1.8400e0031.8400e0030.0912 5.2000e- 72.8884 004

0.0918 0.0242 4.8000e004Worker 0.0259 0.0199 0.2721 7.8000e- 0.0247 004

0.0000 40.3640 40.3640 1.3500e0035.8500e0030.0143 4.8000e- 42.1406 004

0.0148 4.1300e0034.6000e004Vendor 2.4500e- 4.5900e-003 003

0.0864 0.0329 4.1000e004
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

0.0000 3.4774 3.4774 9.0000e005

9.0000e0054.3900e- 3.5059
003

3.0000e0054.4100e0031.1700e0032.0000e005Total 1.2500e- 1.1900e-003 003

9.6000e0040.0131 4.0000e005

0.0000 3.4774 3.4774 9.0000e0059.0000e0054.3900e- 3.5059 003

3.0000e0054.4100e0031.1700e0032.0000e005Worker 1.2500e- 1.1900e-003 003

9.6000e0040.0131 4.0000e005
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

0.0000 2.5533 2.5533 1.5000e0047.1000e- 0.0000 2.5571
004

7.1000e0047.1000e004Total 1.0451 0.0130 0.0181 3.0000e- 7.1000e-004 005

0.0000 2.5533 2.5533 1.5000e0047.1000e- 0.0000 2.5571
004

7.1000e0047.1000e004Off-Road 1.9200e- 7.1000e-004
003

0.0130 0.0181 3.0000e005
Archit. Coating 1.0432 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

0.0000 1.3040 1.3040 3.0000e0053.0000e0051.6500e- 1.3147 003

1.0000e0051.6600e0034.4000e0041.0000e005Total 4.7000e- 4.5000e-004 004

3.6000e0044.9100e0031.0000e005

0.0000 1.3040 1.3040 3.0000e0053.0000e0051.6500e- 1.3147 003

1.0000e0051.6600e0034.4000e0041.0000e005Worker 4.7000e- 4.5000e-004 004

3.6000e0044.9100e0031.0000e005
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

0.0000 20.0268 20.0268 6.4800e0035.1000e- 0.0000 20.1888 003

5.1000e0034.6900e003Total 0.0103 0.1019 0.1458 2.3000e- 4.6900e-003 004
Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 20.0268 20.0268 6.4800e0035.1000e- 0.0000 20.1888 003

5.1000e0034.6900e003Off-Road 0.0103 0.1019 0.1458 2.3000e- 4.6900e-003 004
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

0.0000 1.3040 1.3040 3.0000e0053.0000e0051.6500e- 1.3147 003

1.0000e0051.6600e0034.4000e0041.0000e005Total 4.7000e- 4.5000e-004 004

3.6000e0044.9100e0031.0000e005 I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

72.50 19.00 37 20 43

28.00 13.00 92 5 3
High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)

16.60 8.40 6.90 8.50

0.00 0.00 0 0 0
General Light Industry 16.60 8.40 6.90 59.00

19.20 40.60 86 11 3
Enclosed Parking Structure 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00
H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by
Apartments Mid Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20

4.3 Trip Type Information
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W
Total 9,947.06 10,629.35 12,416.28 16,120,299 16,120,299 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 9,086.58 9,914.40 11553.84 13,024,988 13,024,988 General Light Industry 243.04 97.51 245.00 985,425 985,425 Enclosed Parking Structure 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual VMT
Apartments Mid Rise 617.44 617.44 617.44 2,109,886 2,109,886

4.2 Trip Summary Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT
Unmitigated 3.7478 3.6376 30.5429 0.0583 6.0687 0.0456 6.1142 1.6196 0.0423 1.6619 0.0000 5,479.5218 5,479.5218 0.4454 0.2865 5,576.0273 Mitigated 3.7478 3.6376 30.5429 0.0583 6.0687 0.0456 6.1142 1.6196 0.0423 1.6619 0.0000 5,479.5218 5,479.5218 0.4454 0.2865 5,576.0273 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10

0.0000 3.4774 3.4774 9.0000e0059.0000e0054.3900e- 3.5059 003

3.0000e0054.4100e0031.1700e0032.0000e005Total 1.2500e- 1.1900e-003 003

9.6000e0040.0131 4.0000e005

0.0000 3.4774 3.4774 9.0000e0059.0000e0054.3900e- 3.5059 003

3.0000e0054.4100e0031.1700e0032.0000e005Worker 1.2500e- 1.1900e-003 003

9.6000e0040.0131 4.0000e005
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

0.0000 2.5533 2.5533 1.5000e0047.1000e- 0.0000 2.5571
004

7.1000e0047.1000e004Total 1.0451 0.0130 0.0181 3.0000e- 7.1000e-004 005

0.0000 2.5533 2.5533 1.5000e0047.1000e- 0.0000 2.5571
004

7.1000e0047.1000e004Off-Road 1.9200e- 7.1000e-004
003

0.0130 0.0181 3.0000e005
Archit. Coating 1.0432 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
--1 -I -I 1--1

I I I I I I I I I I

6.2700e- 0.0794 0.0000 1,137.3869 1,137.3869 0.0218 0.0209 1,144.1459 003

0.0794 0.0794 0.0794
995.5942 0.0191 0.0183 1,001.5105
Total 0.1149 1.0396 0.8393

0.0695 0.0695 0.0695 0.0000 995.5942

47.2414
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)

1.86567e+0
07 0.1006 0.9146 0.7682 5.4900e0030.0695

3.2800e-003 0.0000 46.9623 46.9623 9.0000e0048.6000e0042.6000e0043.2800e0033.2800e0033.2800e003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
General Light
Industry
880040 4.7500e0030.0431 0.0362
Enclosed Parking 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Structure
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

6.6200e-003 0.0000 94.8305 94.8305 1.8200e0031.7400e0035.2000e0046.6200e0036.6200e0036.6200e003 Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise

1.77706e+0
06 9.5800e0030.0819 0.0348
Fugitive Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total

95.3940
1,144.1459
Mitigated
NaturalGas
Use
ROG NOx CO SO2

6.2700e- 0.0794 0.0000 1,137.3869 1,137.3869 0.0218 0.0209 003

0.0794 0.0794 0.0794
995.5942 0.0191 0.0183 1,001.5105
Total 0.1149 1.0396 0.8393

0.0695 0.0695 0.0695 0.0000 995.5942

47.2414
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)

1.86567e+0
07 0.1006 0.9146 0.7682 5.4900e0030.0695

3.2800e-003 0.0000 46.9623 46.9623 9.0000e0048.6000e0042.6000e0043.2800e0033.2800e0033.2800e003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
General Light
Industry
880040 4.7500e0030.0431 0.0362

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

95.3940
Enclosed Parking
Structure
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

6.6200e-003 0.0000 94.8305 94.8305 1.8200e0031.7400e0035.2000e0046.6200e0036.6200e0036.6200e003Apartments Mid Rise

1.77706e+0
06 9.5800e0030.0819 0.0348
NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Unmitigated
NaturalGas
Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
NaturalGas 0.0794 0.0794 0.0794 0.0794 0.0000 1,137.3869 1,137.3869 0.0218 0.0209 1,144.1459 Unmitigated

0.1149 1.0396 0.8393 6.2700e003
NaturalGas 0.0794 0.0794 0.0794 0.0794 0.0000 1,137.3869 1,137.3869 0.0218 0.0209 1,144.1459 Mitigated

0.1149 1.0396 0.8393 6.2700e003

0.0000 910.0880 910.0880 0.0768 9.3100e003Electricity 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 914.7830 Unmitigated

0.0000 910.0880 910.0880 0.0768 9.3100e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 914.7830 CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity Mitigated
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5

0.000751 0.003721

5.0 Energy Detail
Historical Energy Use: N

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
ROG NOx CO
High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 0.542450 0.061470 0.185138 0.129299 0.023799 0.006448 0.011958 0.009209 0.000810 0.000503 0.024446

0.009209 0.000810 0.000503 0.024446 0.000751 0.003721

0.000751 0.003721
General Light Industry 0.542450 0.061470 0.185138 0.129299 0.023799 0.006448 0.011958 Enclosed Parking Structure 0.542450 0.061470 0.185138 0.129299 0.023799 0.006448 0.011958 0.009209 0.000810 0.000503 0.024446

0.009209 0.000810 0.000503 0.024446 0.000751 0.003721

SBUS MH
Apartments Mid Rise 0.542450 0.061470 0.185138 0.129299 0.023799 0.006448 0.011958 Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY

4.4 Fleet Mix
l l I I I I I Ill l 11

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

6.2 Area by SubCategory
Unmitigated
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

9.1016 30.0608 39.1624 0.0453 5.1000e004Unmitigated 1.1639 0.0470 1.8339 1.5900e- 0.0777 0.0777 0.0777 0.0777 40.4467 003

0.0000 30.0608 30.0608 2.7600e0035.1000e0049.7300e- 30.2814 003

9.7300e0039.7300e003Mitigated 1.1180 0.0402 1.4173 2.3000e- 9.7300e-003 004
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Use Low VOC Paint - Non-Residential Exterior
Use only Natural Gas Hearths
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
914.7830

6.0 Area Detail

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
Use Low VOC Paint - Residential Interior
Use Low VOC Paint - Residential Exterior
Use Low VOC Paint - Non-Residential Interior
Total 910.0880 0.0768 9.3200e003

94.8595
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)

3.50487e+0
06 621.5731 0.0525 6.3600e003624.7797
General Light
Industry
532140 94.3727 7.9700e-003 9.7000e004

93.3214
Enclosed Parking
Structure
571200 101.2998 8.5500e-003 1.0400e003101.8224
Land Use kWh/yr t
o
n
MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise
523512 92.8425 7.8400e-003 9.5000e004
914.7830
Mitigated
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Total 910.0880 0.0768 9.3200e003

94.8595
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)

3.50487e+0
06 621.5731 0.0525 6.3600e003624.7797
General Light
Industry
532140 94.3727 7.9700e-003 9.7000e004

93.3214
Enclosed Parking
Structure
571200 101.2998 8.5500e-003 1.0400e003101.8224
Land Use kWh/yr t
o
n
MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise
523512 92.8425 7.8400e-003 9.5000e004

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Unmitigated
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I

179.0586
Mitigated
Total 131.7079 1.4690 0.0357

41.7250
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)

24.5862 /

1.56933

67.6671 0.8062 0.0195 93.6417
General Light
Industry

11.3313 / 0 29.7612 0.3714 8.9900e003

43.6920
Enclosed Parking
Structure
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Land Use Mgal t
o
n
MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise

8.86095 /

5.58625

34.2797 0.2914 7.1400e003

7.2 Water by Land Use
Unmitigated
Indoor/Outd
oor Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Unmitigated 131.7079 1.4690 0.0357 179.0586
Category t
o
n
MT/yr
Mitigated 131.7079 1.4690 0.0357 179.0586

7.0 Water Detail

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

0.0000 30.0608 30.0608 2.7500e0035.1000e0049.7300e- 30.2814 003

9.7300e0039.7300e003Total 1.1180 0.0402 1.4173 2.2000e- 9.7300e-003 004

0.0000 2.3010 2.3010 2.2200e0037.7900e- 0.0000 2.3566
003

7.7900e0037.7900e003Landscaping 0.0426 0.0162 1.4071 7.0000e- 7.7900e-003 005

0.0000 27.7599 27.7599 5.3000e0045.1000e0041.9400e- 27.9248 003

1.9400e0031.9400e003Hearth 2.8100e- 1.9400e-003
003

0.0240 0.0102 1.5000e004
Consumer Products 0.9682 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Architectural 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating

0.1043
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Mitigated
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10

9.1016 30.0608 39.1624 0.0453 5.1000e004Total 1.1639 0.0470 1.8339 1.5800e- 0.0777 0.0777 0.0777 0.0777 40.4467 003

0.0000 2.3010 2.3010 2.2200e0037.7900e- 0.0000 2.3566
003

7.7900e0037.7900e003Landscaping 0.0426 0.0162 1.4071 7.0000e- 7.7900e-003 005

9.1016 27.7599 36.8614 0.0431 5.1000e004Hearth 0.0487 0.0308 0.4269 1.5100e- 0.0699 0.0699 0.0699 0.0699 38.0901 003
Consumer Products 0.9682 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Architectural 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating

0.1043
I
I

I I I I
I
I
I

Total 220.6958 13.0428 0.0000 546.7646

30.5563
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
963.9 195.6630 11.5634 0.0000 484.7468
General Light
Industry

60.76 12.3337 0.7289 0.0000

31.4615
Enclosed Parking
Structure
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Land Use tons t
o
n
MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise

62.56 12.6991 0.7505 0.0000
546.7646
Mitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Total 220.6958 13.0428 0.0000

30.5563
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
963.9 195.6630 11.5634 0.0000 484.7468
General Light
Industry

60.76 12.3337 0.7289 0.0000

31.4615
Enclosed Parking
Structure
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Land Use tons t
o
n
MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise

62.56 12.6991 0.7505 0.0000

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Unmitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Unmitigated 220.6958 13.0428 0.0000 546.7646
t
o
n
MT/yr
Mitigated 220.6958 13.0428 0.0000 546.7646
179.0586

8.0 Waste Detail

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
Category/Year
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Total 131.7079 1.4690 0.0357

41.7250
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)

24.5862 /

1.56933

67.6671 0.8062 0.0195 93.6417
General Light
Industry

11.3313 / 0 29.7612 0.3714 8.9900e003

43.6920
Enclosed Parking
Structure
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Land Use Mgal t
o
n
MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise

8.86095 /

5.58625

34.2797 0.2914 7.1400e003
Indoor/Outd
oor Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e I
I
I I I

User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number

11.0 Vegetation
Load Factor Fuel Type
Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year

Appendix B
Cultural Resources Supporting
Documentation

STATE OF CALIFORNIA Gavin Newsom, Governor

NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION

December 3, 2021
Fatima Clark
ESA
Via Email to: [email protected]
Re: City of Covina’s Mixed Use Overlay Project, Los Angeles County Dear Ms. Clark:

A record search of the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) Sacred Lands File (SLF) was completed for the information submitted for the above referenced project. The results were positive. Please contact the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation on the attached list for information. Please note that tribes do not always record their sacred sites in the SLF, nor are they required to do so. A SLF search is not a substitute for consultation with tribes that are traditionally and culturally affiliated with a project’s geographic area. Other sources of cultural resources should also be contacted for information regarding known and recorded sites, such as the appropriate regional California Historical Research Information System (CHRIS) archaeological Information Center for the presence of recorded archaeological sites.

Attached is a list of Native American tribes who may also have knowledge of cultural resources in the project area. This list should provide a starting place in locating areas of potential adverse impact within the proposed project area. Please contact all of those listed; if they cannot supply information, they may recommend others with specific knowledge. By contacting all those listed, your organization will be better able to respond to claims of failure to consult with the appropriate tribe. If a response has not been received within two weeks of notification, the Commission requests that you follow-up with a telephone call or email to ensure that the project information has been received.

If you receive notification of change of addresses and phone numbers from tribes, please notify the NAHC. With your assistance, we can assure that our lists contain current information.

If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at my email address: [email protected].

Sincerely,
Andrew Green
Cultural Resources Analyst
Attachment

CHAIRPERSON
Laura Miranda
Luiseño

VICE CHAIRPERSON
Reginald Pagaling
Chumash

PARLIAMENTARIAN
Russell Attebery
Karuk

COMMISSIONER
William Mungary
Paiute/White Mountain
Apache

COMMISSIONER
Isaac Bojorquez
Ohlone-Costanoan

COMMISSIONER
Sara Dutschke
Miwok

COMMISSIONER
Buffy McQuillen
Yokayo Pomo, Yuki,
Nomlaki

COMMISSIONER
Wayne Nelson
Luiseño

COMMISSIONER
Stanley Rodriguez
Kumeyaay

EXECUTIVE SECRETARY
Christina Snider
Pomo

NAHC HEADQUARTERS
1550 Harbor Boulevard
Suite 100
West Sacramento,
California 95691
(916) 373-3710
[email protected]
NAHC.ca.gov
~~

Gabrieleno Band of Mission
Indians - Kizh Nation
Andrew Salas, Chairperson
P.O. Box 393
Covina, CA, 91723
Phone: (626) 926 - 4131
[email protected]
Gabrieleno
Gabrieleno/Tongva San Gabriel
Band of Mission Indians
Anthony Morales, Chairperson
P.O. Box 693
San Gabriel, CA, 91778
Phone: (626) 483 - 3564
Fax: (626) 286-1262
[email protected]
Gabrieleno
Gabrielino /Tongva Nation
Sandonne Goad, Chairperson
106 1/2 Judge John Aiso St.,
#231
Los Angeles, CA, 90012
Phone: (951) 807 - 0479
[email protected]
Gabrielino
Gabrielino Tongva Indians of
California Tribal Council
Robert Dorame, Chairperson
P.O. Box 490
Bellflower, CA, 90707
Phone: (562) 761 - 6417
Fax: (562) 761-6417
[email protected]
Gabrielino
Gabrielino Tongva Indians of
California Tribal Council
Christina Conley, Tribal
Consultant and Administrator
P.O. Box 941078
Simi Valley, CA, 93094
Phone: (626) 407 - 8761
[email protected]
u
Gabrielino
Gabrielino-Tongva Tribe
Charles Alvarez,
23454 Vanowen Street
West Hills, CA, 91307
Phone: (310) 403 - 6048
[email protected]
Gabrielino
San Manuel Band of Mission
Indians
Jessica Mauck, Director of
Cultural Resources
26569 Community Center Drive
Highland, CA, 92346
Phone: (909) 864 - 8933
Jessica.Mauck@sanmanuelnsn.gov
Serrano
Santa Rosa Band of Cahuilla
Indians
Lovina Redner, Tribal Chair
P.O. Box 391820
Anza, CA, 92539
Phone: (951) 659 - 2700
Fax: (951) 659-2228
[email protected]
Cahuilla
Soboba Band of Luiseno
Indians
Joseph Ontiveros, Cultural
Resource Department
P.O. BOX 487
San Jacinto, CA, 92581
Phone: (951) 663 - 5279
Fax: (951) 654-4198
[email protected]
Cahuilla
Luiseno
Soboba Band of Luiseno
Indians
Isaiah Vivanco, Chairperson
P. O. Box 487
San Jacinto, CA, 92581
Phone: (951) 654 - 5544
Fax: (951) 654-4198
[email protected]
Cahuilla
Luiseno
1 of 1
This list is current only as of the date of this document. Distribution of this list does not relieve any person of statutory responsibility as defined in Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code, Section 5097.94 of the Public Resource Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code.

This list is only applicable for contacting local Native Americans with regard to cultural resources assessment for the proposed City of Covina’s Mixed Use Overlay Project, Los Angeles County.

PROJ-2021-
005816
12/03/2021 01:57 PM
Native American Heritage Commission
Native American Contact List
Los Angeles County
12/3/2021

Appendix C
Noise Measurements and
Modeling

TRAFFIC NOISE ANALYSIS TOOL
Project Name: Covina MUOD
Analysis Scenario: Summary
Source of Traffic Volumes: Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers Existing Existing with
project
Increase over
Existing
Arrow Highway between Arrow Grand Circle and Grand Ave Hard 30 71.2 71.6 0.3 No Arrow Highway between Grand Ave and 1000' Easterly Hard 30 71.3 71.7 0.3 No Cypress Street between Leaf Ave and Hollenbeck Ave Hard 30 70.0 70.3 0.2 No Cypress Street between Hollenbeck Ave and Citrus Ave Hard 30 69.0 69.3 0.3 No Cypress Street between Citrus Ave and Barranca Ave Hard 30 67.9 68.2 0.4 No Cypress Street between Barranca Ave and Grand Ave Hard 30 67.4 67.8 0.4 No Cypress Street between Grand Ave and Glendora Ave Hard 30 67.7 68.1 0.4 No Cypress Street between Glendora Ave and Bonnie Cove Ave Hard 30 67.0 67.5 0.4 No Cypress Street between Bonnie Cove Ave and Sunflower Ave Hard 30 66.5 67.0 0.5 No San Bernardino Road between Vincent Ave and Lark Ellen Ave Hard 30 69.5 69.9 0.5 No San Bernardino Road between Lark Ellen Ave and Azusa Ave Hard 30 70.4 70.8 0.4 No San Bernardino Road between Azusa Ave and Hollenbeck Ave Hard 30 69.4 69.8 0.5 No San Bernardino Road between Hollenbeck Ave and Citrus Ave Hard 30 68.8 69.2 0.4 No San Bernardino Road between Citrus Ave and Barranca Ave Hard 30 68.9 69.3 0.4 No San Bernardino Road between Barranca Ave and Grand Ave Hard 30 68.2 68.6 0.5 No Covina Blvd between Firecroft Ave and Citrus Ave Hard 30 67.5 67.9 0.4 No Covina Blvd between Citrus Ave and Grand Ave Hard 30 68.1 68.4 0.4 No Covina Blvd between Grand Ave and Rimhurst Ave Hard 30 67.7 68.1 0.4 No Covina Blvd between Bonnie Cove Ave and Sunflower Ave Hard 30 66.8 67.3 0.5 No Citrus Ave between Workman Ave and Rowland Ave Hard 30 72.8 73.1 0.4 No Citrus Ave between Rowland Ave and Puente St Hard 30 71.2 71.7 0.5 No Citrus Ave between Puente St and Badillo St Hard 30 70.9 71.4 0.6 No Citrus Ave between Badillo St and San Bernardino Rd Hard 30 69.1 70.3 1.1 No Citrus Ave between San Bernardino Rd and Covina Blvd Hard 30 69.7 70.3 0.6 No Citrus Ave between Covina Blvd and Arrow Hwy Hard 30 70.6 71.0 0.4 No Hollenbeck Ave between South City Limits and Rowland Ave Hard 30 68.0 68.3 0.3 No Hollenbeck Ave between Rowland Ave and Badillo St Hard 30 68.3 68.6 0.3 No Hollenbeck Ave between Badillo St and Edna Pl Hard 30 69.0 69.3 0.2 No Hollenbeck Ave between Covina Blvd and Arrow Hwy Hard 30 68.3 68.5 0.3 No Significant
Impact? Segment
Ground
Type
Existing
Landuses
Traffic Noise Levels (dBA CNEL)
Traffic Noise Summary Page 336 of 858 ESA 4/6/2022

TRAFFIC NOISE ANALYSIS TOOL
Project Name: Covina MUOD
Analysis Scenario: Project
Source of Traffic Volumes: Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers Auto MT HT Auto MT HT
Arrow Highway between Arrow Grand Circle and Grand Ave Hard 30 40 40 35 1784 39 20 71.3 71.6 Arrow Highway between Grand Ave and 1000' Easterly Hard 30 40 40 35 1818 39 21 71.4 71.7 Cypress Street between Leaf Ave and Hollenbeck Ave Hard 30 40 40 35 1330 28 14 70.0 70.3 Cypress Street between Hollenbeck Ave and Citrus Ave Hard 30 40 40 25 1068 23 11 69.0 69.3 Cypress Street between Citrus Ave and Barranca Ave Hard 30 40 40 35 829 18 9 67.9 68.2 Cypress Street between Barranca Ave and Grand Ave Hard 30 40 40 35 759 16 8 67.5 67.8 Cypress Street between Grand Ave and Glendora Ave Hard 30 40 40 35 809 17 9 67.8 68.1 Cypress Street between Glendora Ave and Bonnie Cove Ave Hard 30 40 40 35 698 15 8 67.2 67.5 Cypress Street between Bonnie Cove Ave and Sunflower Ave Hard 30 40 40 35 623 14 7 66.7 67.0 San Bernardino Road between Vincent Ave and Lark Ellen Ave Hard 30 40 40 35 1221 26 14 69.6 69.9 San Bernardino Road between Lark Ellen Ave and Azusa Ave Hard 30 40 40 35 1480 31 17 70.5 70.8 San Bernardino Road between Azusa Ave and Hollenbeck Ave Hard 30 40 40 35 1189 25 14 69.5 69.8 San Bernardino Road between Hollenbeck Ave and Citrus Ave Hard 30 40 40 35 1018 23 13 68.9 69.2 San Bernardino Road between Citrus Ave and Barranca Ave Hard 30 40 40 35 1035 23 13 69.0 69.3 San Bernardino Road between Barranca Ave and Grand Ave Hard 30 40 40 35 887 20 11 68.3 68.6 Covina Blvd between Firecroft Ave and Citrus Ave Hard 30 40 40 35 762 16 8 67.6 67.9 Covina Blvd between Citrus Ave and Grand Ave Hard 30 40 40 35 871 19 9 68.1 68.4 Covina Blvd between Grand Ave and Rimhurst Ave Hard 30 40 40 35 804 17 9 67.8 68.1 Covina Blvd between Bonnie Cove Ave and Sunflower Ave Hard 30 40 40 35 662 14 7 67.0 67.3 Citrus Ave between Workman Ave and Rowland Ave Hard 30 40 40 35 2556 55 28 72.8 73.1 Citrus Ave between Rowland Ave and Puente St Hard 30 40 40 35 1824 40 21 71.4 71.7 Citrus Ave between Puente St and Badillo St Hard 30 40 40 35 1724 38 20 71.1 71.4 Citrus Ave between Badillo St and San Bernardino Rd Hard 30 40 40 35 1273 30 18 70.0 70.3 Citrus Ave between San Bernardino Rd and Covina Blvd Hard 30 40 40 35 1307 29 16 70.0 70.3 Citrus Ave between Covina Blvd and Arrow Hwy Hard 30 40 40 35 1565 34 17 70.7 71.0 Hollenbeck Ave between South City Limits and Rowland Ave Hard 30 35 35 30 1193 25 14 68.0 68.3 Hollenbeck Ave between Rowland Ave and Badillo St Hard 30 35 35 30 1276 27 15 68.3 68.6 Hollenbeck Ave between Badillo St and Edna Pl Hard 30 35 35 30 1501 32 17 69.0 69.3 Hollenbeck Ave between Covina Blvd and Arrow Hwy Hard 30 35 35 30 1264 27 14 68.2 68.5 Segment Ground
Type
Distance from
Roadway
Traffic Segment Speed Limit Peak Hour Volume Peak Hour
Noise Level
(Leq(h) dBA)
Noise Level
dBA CNEL
Traffic Noise Summary Page 337 of 858 ESA 4/6/2022

TRAFFIC NOISE ANALYSIS TOOL
Project Name: Covina MUOD
Analysis Scenario: Existing
Source of Traffic Volumes: Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers Auto MT HT Auto MT HT
Arrow Highway between Arrow Grand Circle and Grand Ave Hard 30 40 40 35 1676 35 17 70.9 71.2 Arrow Highway between Grand Ave and 1000' Easterly Hard 30 40 40 35 1710 35 18 71.0 71.3 Cypress Street between Leaf Ave and Hollenbeck Ave Hard 30 40 40 35 1269 26 13 69.7 70.0 Cypress Street between Hollenbeck Ave and Citrus Ave Hard 30 40 40 25 1007 21 10 68.7 69.0 Cypress Street between Citrus Ave and Barranca Ave Hard 30 40 40 35 768 16 8 67.6 67.9 Cypress Street between Barranca Ave and Grand Ave Hard 30 40 40 35 698 14 7 67.1 67.4 Cypress Street between Grand Ave and Glendora Ave Hard 30 40 40 35 748 15 8 67.4 67.7 Cypress Street between Glendora Ave and Bonnie Cove Ave Hard 30 40 40 35 637 13 7 66.7 67.0 Cypress Street between Bonnie Cove Ave and Sunflower Ave Hard 30 40 40 35 562 12 6 66.2 66.5 San Bernardino Road between Vincent Ave and Lark Ellen Ave Hard 30 40 40 35 1115 23 11 69.2 69.5 San Bernardino Road between Lark Ellen Ave and Azusa Ave Hard 30 40 40 35 1374 28 14 70.1 70.4 San Bernardino Road between Azusa Ave and Hollenbeck Ave Hard 30 40 40 35 1083 22 11 69.1 69.4 San Bernardino Road between Hollenbeck Ave and Citrus Ave Hard 30 40 40 35 954 20 10 68.5 68.8 San Bernardino Road between Citrus Ave and Barranca Ave Hard 30 40 40 35 971 20 10 68.6 68.9 San Bernardino Road between Barranca Ave and Grand Ave Hard 30 40 40 35 823 17 8 67.9 68.2 Covina Blvd between Firecroft Ave and Citrus Ave Hard 30 40 40 35 701 14 7 67.2 67.5 Covina Blvd between Citrus Ave and Grand Ave Hard 30 40 40 35 810 17 8 67.8 68.1 Covina Blvd between Grand Ave and Rimhurst Ave Hard 30 40 40 35 743 15 8 67.4 67.7 Covina Blvd between Bonnie Cove Ave and Sunflower Ave Hard 30 40 40 35 601 12 6 66.5 66.8 Citrus Ave between Workman Ave and Rowland Ave Hard 30 40 40 35 2376 49 24 72.5 72.8 Citrus Ave between Rowland Ave and Puente St Hard 30 40 40 35 1644 34 17 70.9 71.2 Citrus Ave between Puente St and Badillo St Hard 30 40 40 35 1544 32 16 70.6 70.9 Citrus Ave between Badillo St and San Bernardino Rd Hard 30 40 40 35 1029 21 11 68.8 69.1 Citrus Ave between San Bernardino Rd and Covina Blvd Hard 30 40 40 35 1182 24 12 69.4 69.7 Citrus Ave between Covina Blvd and Arrow Hwy Hard 30 40 40 35 1453 30 15 70.3 70.6 Hollenbeck Ave between South City Limits and Rowland Ave Hard 30 35 35 30 1136 23 12 67.7 68.0 Hollenbeck Ave between Rowland Ave and Badillo St Hard 30 35 35 30 1219 25 13 68.0 68.3 Hollenbeck Ave between Badillo St and Edna Pl Hard 30 35 35 30 1444 30 15 68.7 69.0 Hollenbeck Ave between Covina Blvd and Arrow Hwy Hard 30 35 35 30 1207 25 12 68.0 68.3 Peak Hour
Noise Level
(Leq(h) dBA)
Segment
Ground
Type
Distance from
Roadway
Traffic Segment Speed Limit Peak Hour Volume Noise Level dBA CNEL
Traffic Noise Summary Page 338 of 858 ESA 4/6/2022

Appendix D
Transportation Assessment
Report

TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT REPORT

COVINA MIXED-USE OVERLAY DISTRICT
City of Covina, California
March 3, 2022
Prepared for:

Environmental Science Associates
626 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1100
Los Angeles, California 90017
LLG Ref. 1-21-4451-1
Prepared by: Under the Supervision of:

Francesca S. Bravo Clare M. Look-Jaeger, P.E.

Senior Transportation Engineer Principal

LINSCOTT
LAW &

GREENSPAN
engineers
Linscott, Law &
Greenspan, Engineers
600 S. Lake Avenue
Suite 500
Pasadena, CA 911 06
626.796.2322 T
626.792.0941 F
www.llgengineers.com Page 342 of 858
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-21-4451-1 Covina Mixed-Use Overlay District
O:\JOB_FILE\4451\Report\4451-Rpt.doc
i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION PAGE

1.0 Introduction............................................................................................................................. 1

1.1 Transportation Assessment Overview............................................................................. 1

1.2 Study Methodology ......................................................................................................... 1

2.0 Project Description.................................................................................................................. 3

2.1 Project Location .............................................................................................................. 3

2.2 Existing Project Conditions............................................................................................. 3

2.3 Proposed Project Description .......................................................................................... 3

2.4 Project Construction ........................................................................................................ 6

2.5 Project Trip Generation

2.5.1 Project Trip Generation Forecast ........................................................................ 6

3.0 Vehicle Miles Traveled Analysis............................................................................................ 10

3.1 Transit Priority Screening ................................................................................................ 10

3.2 Low VMT Area Screening .............................................................................................. 11

3.3 Project Type Screening.................................................................................................... 11

3.4 Impact Criteria and Methodology ................................................................................... 13

3.5 Transportation Demand Management Measures............................................................ 13

3.6 Project VMT Analysis..................................................................................................... 13

3.7 Summary of Cumulative VMT Analysis ........................................................................ 14

4.0 Summary and Conclusions.................................................................................................... 16

APPENDICES

APPENDIX
A. VMT Evaluation Tool Worksheets

LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-21-4451-1 Covina Mixed-Use Overlay District
O:\JOB_FILE\4451\Report\4451-Rpt.doc
ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)

LIST OF TABLES
SECTION—TABLE # PAGE
2–1 General Plan Designations and Zoning Classifications by Project Area .............................. 5 2–2 Potential Dwelling Units by Project Area ............................................................................. 7 2–3 Mixed-Use Overlay District Trip Generation ........................................................................ 8 3–1 VMT Assessment Summary by Project Area........................................................................ 15

LIST OF FIGURES
SECTION—FIGURE # PAGE
1–1 Regional Vicinity Map........................................................................................................... 2 2–1 Proposed Project Areas and Mixed-Use Parcels................................................................. 4

LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-21-4451-1 Covina Mixed-Use Overlay District
O:\JOB_FILE\4451\Report\4451-Rpt.doc

TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT REPORT

COVINA MIXED-USE OVERLAY DISTRICT
City of Covina, California
March 3, 2022

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Transportation Assessment Overview
This transportation assessment report has been prepared to identify and evaluate the potential transportation impacts of the proposed Covina Mixed-Use Overlay District (“proposed project”).

The Project is located in the City of Covina within the San Gabriel Valley of the County of Los Angeles. The surrounding jurisdictions include Duarte, Azusa, and Glendora to the north, San Dimas to the east, West Covina to the south, and Irwindale and Baldwin Park to west and pockets of Los Angeles County unincorporated areas adjacent and within city limits. The general vicinity is shown in Figure 1-1.

The transportation assessment follows the City of Covina Transportation Study Guidelines1 (“Guidelines”). The Guidelines are focused on transportation metrics that promote: the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, the development of multimodal networks and access to diverse land uses, as well as safety, sustainability and smart growth. In compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Guidelines identify vehicle miles traveled (VMT) as the primary metric for evaluating a project’s transportation impacts.

This assessment report (i) presents the proposed project’s location and potential future development, (ii) forecasts project-generated traffic, (iii) presents a CEQA assessment of project-related VMT, and (iv) recommends transportation network improvement measures, where necessary.

1.2 Study Methodology
The CEQA review for this transportation assessment was determined based on the City’s Guidelines, the proposed project description and location, and the characteristics of the surrounding transportation system. Based on the City’s adoption of Resolution CC 2020-56 and the City’s new guidelines regarding the VMT thresholds of significance for the purposes of analyzing transportation impacts under CEQA, the proposed project’s VMT is evaluated herein against these thresholds.

These thresholds are also consistent with the recommended screening criteria contained in the State of California Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR)’s 2018 Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA2.
1 City of Covina Transportation Study Guidelines for Vehicle Miles Traveled and Level of Service Assessment, October 2020.
2 Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA, State of California Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, December 2018.
-1-

-2-
_,
l l L~, 1111 µ_t=j-LJ LJ
Er I =-~
~11 i:-11 1111~-h-h _i_'. -,1 r _:__- 1/
b-~~ -,,..y-
__ .'! I H--_ .. -:,'"1
e
,,.,
.;;
N N
:;,-
s
0 '
.
;,- N
!
?
A
0 LINSCOTT
LAW &

GREENSPAN
eng i n ee r s
·-- - ·- - ·- - ·- - i I
I I City of Covina 1-- - -- - -- - -- - I
Figure 1-1
Regional Vicinity Map
Covina Mixed-Use Overlay District

LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-21-4451-1 Covina Mixed-Use Overlay District
O:\JOB_FILE\4451\Report\4451-Rpt.doc

2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

2.1 Project Location
The Project comprises a total of 141 parcels within 13 Project Areas (Areas A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J K, L, M) consisting of approximately 74.83 acres located throughout the City. The 141 parcels within the 13 Project Areas are referred to as the Project Site. The proposed Project Areas and Mixed-Use Parcels are illustrated in Figure 2-1.

Regional access to the Project Site is provided via Interstate 210 (I-210) Freeway to the north, Interstate 10 (I-10) Freeway to the south, and South Azusa Avenue/California State Route 39 (SR39) to the east of Project Areas L, K, and M and to the west for the remainder of the Project Areas.

Local access to/from the Project Areas is provided via various local, collector and secondary and primary arterials roadways throughout the City.

2.2 Existing Project Conditions
The existing site conditions associated with the 13 Project Areas consist of developed lots and generally comprise commercial uses, asphalt surface parking lots, and ornamental landscaping and trees. The existing general plan designations for the 141 parcels within the 13 Project Areas consist of General Commercial (GC), Town Center Commercial (TC-C), and General Industrial (GI). The existing zoning classifications for the 141 parcels within the 13 Project Areas consist of C-P (Administrative and Professional Office), C-2 (Neighborhood Shopping Center), C-3 (Central Business), C-3A (Commercial Zone, Regional or Community Shopping Center), C-3A (Planned Community Development [PCD]) (PCD Administrative and Professional Office), C-4 (Commercial Zone, Highway), C-5 (Specified Highway), M-1 (Industrial Zone), TC-C (Town Center Zone), and RD-1500 (Multiple-Family). The existing general plan designations and zoning classification for each of the 13 Project Areas are provided in Table 2-1.

2.3 Proposed Project Description
The purpose of the City’s Mixed-Use Overlay District (MUOD) is to guide and regulate future mixed-use development and redevelopment under the policies and objectives of the Mixed-Use general plan designation as established in the City’s General Plan. The MUOD allows horizontal mixed-use and vertical mixed-use development and redevelopment and creates specific development regulations and design criteria and standards to achieve a high-quality mixed-use residential project.

The MUOD applies on an as-requested, project-by-project basis, to General Commercial (GC), Town Center Commercial (TC-C), and General Industrial (GI) general plan designations. The MUOD is an overlay zone, that may be added to, but not replace, the underlying zoning classification of the existing parcel. In addition to establishing a new chapter of the MUOD zoning regulations, the City desires to initiate a Citywide Zone Change and to amend the City’s Official Zoning Map to add the MUOD to various sites.

The Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) assignment for the City of Covina is 1,908 new housing units. With the proposed updates to the Housing Element (6th Cycle), the City must -3-

-4-
Is
I
k
.•.
..
--
Mixed-Use Pa
MAP SOURCE:
__ ,
------.r---~--
--~ _j
-=-r::i-_J
HJ
-·u r--t ' I I -"U' ,I .--- , I p r ....... ! L
l~
~ -----:--n_ ..
~1 11 11
--,
'--~"~
, j ! I ih ; •
• ' . 1 1 -"" _ ....... , ,-•-.--. L-=-- l [Et,· - I,~
~'·. ----, i
• ! • t -•"' F • ' ,I ! I r::_:_
_
• 11 ! ! . I ., • ;I -
I j ' . "
~
_______J I j'
I
i- I ' I
I I I I I . ! !- ! . t ' . . _J1 __ ! L- ! 1 t- ' ,_.J r . . - ..- •--- - ... ,---~
: ·-· ... ~-,, r ,... , •· . : . . - • '•Pl ' ,t,;· wM; ' . ··'· =
, . . .. . -, • ;11 ~, ,, l, -·"••- I 'L,.,,. ·-· :··-··· ' l. ~- • °"'I ' - • ".;"''" "i , ! + •• .;.-;- ~ •· - I I ••• ' • y ·,!, • ·- . . ' , -, ! -, ·-· • ;. r '·;r· ",·, '" .. , . _.,,__ .. :.-,Ii r ' , ;... ' ·~ . -· r, '""J,r"" ,~ ~ea ..;:-...d 1 ' I ' ' . ' [' 2.''il - ' --• I • .•. . ,--!. .:I! . . __ . -;- '• ~ • j_ " ;:::::"' ' :nl'.'"1- _..- - ' We<.J' \j ",. ' .::....~~:..~ __ , .!: - L , ,-·' -"11,.. : · · " '"' .. ~•I ... I I ·1•1 1. ,, • • 7.':' ,.,..' • ~- . ,' • E ' • • ' .~' - '~" . . ' : " i ; .· ' ,._,,., ·--, . ·-;:· '. ·-· : ,,_ .. ,,. , ··-;; i~ ./0 ·""'1 6 '~ -~ . ·-:·" ... , .. ......... ' . • • •.--,;,,;,.,; I _ /u-"""'""'7 - · ! r • t -• . ••'•• ff 1-• "" • I 1 ..... , J--' P..rea _ ...... 1 I_-_~, i'-=-iH:~ ,h .. ,_,. I'_ Ir ...: -~-- 2, · ,_, .. ! --~ , .~ ..... -.t!I:__,_ ! ! ,.,. ::f l', .•• C • • I ~~---:7 I f<ea F •'-· --• · ,, I .. .,,-'\,..r · . <:
•.r-i / \
r-~ /1. l, __ ,, I 7.-=,,,.... 'Ar'ea ,GI ~-;~~·=::···/ .. ! ! \~-w:_ 6 r ... I' l •,__ . ' • -. 'l,, ·--1 '~ I ,r.::. -- I . #"' :z-! I :
- ~..,,.~---\ l
"\ ' _::::-.i - '"""----
1,000
1 2,000 Feel
t
Proposed Project Area
Figure 2-1
s and Mixed-Use Parcels
Covina Mixed-Use Overlay District Project

Table 2-1

GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS AND ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS BY PROJECT AREA PROJECT AREA GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION [1] ZONING CLASSIFICATION [1] Area A General Commercial (GC)
Area B General Commercial (GC)
Area C General Commercial (GC)
Area D General Commercial (GC)
Area E Town Center Commercial (TC-C)
Area F General Commercial (GC)
Area G General Commercial (GC)
Area H General Commercial (GC)
Area I General Commercial (GC)
Area J General Commercial (GC)
Area K General Commercial (GC)
Area L General Industrial (GI)
Area M General Commercial (GC)
[1] Sources: City of Covina Community Development Department and Environmental Science Associates, January 2022.

C-2 (Neighborhood Shopping Center)
C-2 (Neighborhood Shopping Center), C-3A (Commercial Zone, Regional or Community Shopping Center), C-P (Administrative and Professional Office), and RD-1500 (Multiple-Family). RD-1500 (Multiple Family)
C-2 (Neighborhood Shopping Center), C-5 (Specified Highway), and CP (Administrative and Professional Office) C-2 (Neighborhood Shopping Center) and C-4 (Commercial Zone, Highway)
C-5 (Specified Highway), C-4 (Commercial Zone, Highway), and C-P (Administrative and Professional Office)
C-4 (Commercial Zone, Highway) and C-P (Administrative and Professional Office)
M-1 (Industrial Zone)
C-3A (Commercial Zone, Regional or Community Shopping Center) and C-4 (Commercial Zone, Highway)
C-3A (PCD) (PCD Administrative and Professional Office) C-2 (Neighborhood Shopping Center)
C-2 (Neighborhood Shopping Center) and C-4 (Commercial Zone, Highway)
C-3 (Central Business) and TC-C (Town Center Zone)
C-3A (Commercial Zone, Regional or Community Shopping Center), C-3 (Central Business), and C-4 (Commercial Zone, Highway)
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-21-4451-1 Covina Mixed-Use Overlay District
-5-

LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-21-4451-1 Covina Mixed-Use Overlay District
O:\JOB_FILE\4451\Report\4451-Rpt.doc
demonstrate to the State Housing and Community Development (HCD) that the City will address several required components. One component is an inventory of sites available for future housing developments. Another component is that the City has reduced the CEQA and land use obstacles by rezoning potential sites within the MUOD. The City’s second objective is to comply with the proposed updated Housing Element (6th Cycle). The City’s proposed updated Housing Element (6th Cycle) is on a different time track, while the proposed MUOD will follow after the Housing Element.

The Project consists of adding a new chapter of mixed-use overlay regulations to the City’s Zoning Ordinance and amending the City’s Official Zoning Map through the addition of a MUOD to various sites comprising a total of 141 parcels within 13 Project Areas throughout the City, excluding the Covina Town Center Specific Plan (TCSP). The total acreage is approximately 74.83 with parcels less than 1 acre in size having a density range of 14 to 22 units per acre and parcels of more than

1.01 acres in size having a density range of 22 to 40 units per acre. City staff assumed that 60 percent of the acreage for mixed-use development and redevelopment is for residential uses and the remaining 40 percent is for either commercial or industrial uses. The assumption is that 60 percent of the total approximate 74.83 acres would be allocated for residential uses at an average density of 30 dwelling units per acre, resulting in an estimated 1,360 proposed dwelling units. A summary of each Project Area parcel designation, acreage, and potential number of future dwelling units is provided in Table 2-2.

2.4 Project Construction
The MUOD applies on an as-requested, project-by-project basis, to General Commercial (GC) and General Industrial (GI) general plan designations. As such, the construction schedule and activities associated with the future development and redevelopment of the Project Site is indeterminant at this time, until specific projects are proposed and Applicants have submitted entitlement applications to the City for review.

2.5 Project Trip Generation

2.5.1 Project Trip Generation Forecast
Traffic trip generation is expressed in vehicle trip ends, defined as one-way vehicular movements, either entering or exiting the generating land use. Traffic volumes to be generated by the proposed project were forecast for the weekday AM and PM peak hours, and over a 24-hour period. Trip generation rates provided in the Institute of Transportation Engineers’ (ITE) Trip Generation Manual3 were utilized to forecast project traffic generation for the proposed project. ITE Land Use Code 221 (Multi-Family Housing [Mid-Rise]) trip generation rates were used to forecast the traffic volumes expected to be generated by the proposed residential units.

The trip generation forecast for the proposed project is summarized in Table 2-3. As presented in Table 2-3, the proposed project is expected to generate 504 vehicle trips (117 inbound trips and 387 outbound trips) during the weekday AM peak hour. During the weekday PM peak hour, the 3 Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition, Washington, D.C., 2021. -6-

TABLE 2-2

POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS BY PROJECT AREA
Project Area Number of Parcels Acreage
Potential Dwelling
Units [a]
A 9 7.4395 133
B 1 6.328 113
C 5 2.0528 37
D 10 8.9483 159
E 4 1.3815 24
F 4 8.6438 154
G 54 16.3965 295
H 11 3.0056 54
I 5 1.3362 24
J 13 4.9018 90
K 20 5.2349 95
L 1 2.2735 59
M 4 6.8869 123
TOTAL 141 74.8293 1,360
[a] Source: City of Covina Community Development Department, January 2022. City staff used 60% of the land area in the calculations to satisfy HCD’s criteria. City staff employed 30 units per acre for the density.

LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-21-4451-1 Covina Mixed-Use Overlay District
-7-

Table 2-3
MIXED-USE OVERLAY DISTRICT TRIP GENERATION [1]

DAILY AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR
PROJECT AREA/ TRIP ENDS [2] VOLUMES [2] VOLUMES [2]

LAND USE SIZE VOLUMES IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL
Area A
Residential [3] 133 DU 604 11 38 49 32 20 52
Area B
Residential [3] 113 DU 513 10 32 42 27 17 44
Area C
Residential [3] 37 DU 168 3 11 14 9 5 14
Area D
Residential [3] 159 DU 722 14 45 59 38 24 62
Area E
Residential [3] 24 DU 109 2 7 9 5 4 9
Area F
Residential [3] 154 DU 699 13 44 57 37 23 60
Area G
Residential [3] 295 DU 1,339 25 84 109 70 45 115
Area H
Residential [3] 54 DU 245 5 15 20 13 8 21
Area I
Residential [3] 24 DU 109 2 7 9 5 4 9
Area J
Residential [3] 90 DU 409 8 25 33 21 14 35
Area K
Residential [3] 95 DU 431 8 27 35 23 14 37
Area L
Residential [3] 59 DU 268 5 17 22 14 9 23
Area M
Residential [3] 123 DU 558 11 35 46 29 19 48
TOTAL 1,360 DU 6,174 117 387 504 323 206 529
[1] Source: ITE "Trip Generation Manual", 11th Edition, 2021. [2] Trips are one-way traffic movements, entering or leaving. [3] ITE Land Use Code 221 (Multifamily Housing Mid-Rise [General Urban/Suburban]) trip generation average rates. - Daily Trip Rate: 4.54 trips/dwelling unit; 50% inbound/50% outbound - AM Peak Hour Trip Rate: 0.37 trips/dwelling units; 23% inbound/77% outbound - PM Peak Hour Trip Rate: 0.39 trips/dwelling units; 61% inbound/39% outbound LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-21-4451-1 Covina Mixed-Use Overlay District
-8-

LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-21-4451-1 Covina Mixed-Use Overlay District
O:\JOB_FILE\4451\Report\4451-Rpt.doc
proposed project is expected to generate 529 vehicle trips (323 inbound trips and 206 outbound trips). Over a 24-hour period, the proposed project is forecast to generate 6,174 daily trip ends during a typical weekday (3,087 inbound trips and 3,087 outbound trips). The above trip generation forecast is considered very conservative, in that no specific vehicle trip generation credits have been applied to the forecast to account for existing and occupied land uses that may be demolished as part of any future entitlement application.
-9-

LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-21-4451-1 Covina Mixed-Use Overlay District
O:\JOB_FILE\4451\Report\4451-Rpt.doc

3.0 VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED ANALYSIS
The State of California Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) issued proposed updates to the CEQA guidelines in November 2017 and an accompanying technical advisory guidance finalized in December 2018 (OPR Technical Advisory) that amends the Appendix G question for transportation impacts to delete reference to vehicle delay and level of service and instead refer to Section 15064.3, subdivision (b)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines asking if the project will result in a substantial increase in vehicle miles traveled (VMT). The California Natural Resources Agency certified and adopted the CEQA Guidelines in December of 2018, and are now in effect.

The City of Covina is a member agency of the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments (SGVCOG). The SGVCOG undertook the SGVCOG SB 743 Implementation Study to assist with answering important implementation questions about the methodology, thresholds, and mitigation approaches for VMT impact analysis for its member agencies. As part of the SGVCOG SB 743 Implementation Study, a VMT Evaluation Tool was developed, which is a web-based tool that can be used for VMT screening and mitigation recommendation.

As a member agency of the SGVCOG, the City of Covina utilized the information produced through the Implementation Study to adopt a methodology and significance thresholds for use in CEQA compliance. The City of Covina has adopted VMT as the metric for determining environmental impacts and released its Transportation Study Guidelines on Vehicle Miles Traveled and Level of Service Assessment, dated October 2020. The guidelines outline the steps for complying with the new CEQA VMT analysis. The guidelines have established screening criteria pertaining to project trip generation forecasts, project land use types (i.e., local serving retail, affordable housing, etc.), proximity to transit, and locality within a low VMT-generating area. The guidelines provide the following three (3) types of potential screening criteria that may be applied to screen projects from project-level assessment:
• Transit Priority Areas Screening
• Low VMT-generating Areas Screening
• Project Type Screening

3.1 Transit Priority Area Screening
Projects located within a Transit Priority Area (TPA) may be presumed to have a less than significant impact. A TPA is defined as one-half mile of either an existing major transit stop4 or an existing stop along a high-quality transit corridor5. Thus development projects that are located within one-half mile of either an existing major transit stop or a stop along an existing high-quality transit corridor may also be presumed to cause a less than significant transportation impact. 4 Pub. Resources Code 21064.3: Major transit stop means a site containing an existing rail transit station, a ferry terminal served by either a bus or rail transit service, or the intersection of two or more major bus routes with a frequency of service interval of 15 minutes or less during the morning and afternoon peak commute periods. 5 Pub. Resources Code 21155: A high-quality transit corridor means a corridor with fixed route bus service with service intervals no longer than 15 minutes during peak commute hours. -10-

LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-21-4451-1 Covina Mixed-Use Overlay District
O:\JOB_FILE\4451\Report\4451-Rpt.doc
Similarly, development projects that decrease VMTs in the project area compared to existing conditions may be considered to have a less than significant transportation impact. However, according to the City’s guidelines, the presumption might not be appropriate if the project:
 Has a floor area ratio of less than 0.75;
 Includes more parking for use by residents, customers, or employees of the project than required by the jurisdiction (if the jurisdiction requires the project to supply parking);  Is inconsistent with the applicable Sustainable Communities Strategy (as determined by the Lead Agency with input from the Metropolitan Planning Organization).  Replaces affordable residential units with a smaller number of moderate- or high-income residential units.

3.2 Low VMT Area Screening
As outlined in the City’s guidelines, residential and office development projects located within a low VMT-generating area may be presumed to have a less than significant impact absent any substantial evidence to the contrary. Other employment-related and mixed-use land use projects may also qualify for the screening if the project can reasonably be expected to generate VMT per resident, per worker or per service population that is similar to the existing land uses in the low VMT-generating area.

If the proposed project is residential, the project is considered screened out if it is located within the Low VMT areas of the “PA/Residential Home-Based VMT per Capita”. Alternatively, if the predominant land uses in the vicinity are nominally of the same type as the proposed project and the proposed project is reasonably expected to generate similar VMT as the existing land uses, the project is considered screened out if it is in the low VMT area for the “Total Daily VMT per Service Population”.

3.3 Project Type Screening
Some project types have been identified in the City’s guidelines as having the presumption of a less than significant impact. The following uses can be presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary as their uses are local serving in nature:
• Local-serving K-12 schools
• Local parks
• Day care centers
• Local-serving retail uses less than 50,000 square feet, including:
• Gas stations
• Banks
-11-

LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-21-4451-1 Covina Mixed-Use Overlay District
O:\JOB_FILE\4451\Report\4451-Rpt.doc
• Restaurants
• Shopping Center
• Local-serving hotels (e.g., non-destination hotels)
• Local-serving assembly uses (places of worship, community organizations) • Community institutions (public libraries, fire stations, local government) • Affordable, supportive, or transitional housing
• Assisted living facilities
• Senior housing (as defined by HUD)
• Local serving community colleges that are consistent with the assumptions noted in the

RTP/SCS
• Student housing projects on or adjacent to a college campus • Other local-serving uses as approved by the City Traffic Engineer • Projects generating less than 110 daily vehicle trips6, 7 • This generally corresponds to the following “typical” development potentials:
o 11 single family housing units
o 16 multi-family, condominiums, or townhouse housing units o 10,000 sq. ft. of office
o 15,000 sq. ft. of light industrial8
o 63,000 sq. ft. of warehousing6
o 79,000 sq. ft. of high cube transload and short-term storage warehouse Local serving retail projects with a total square footage less than 50,000 square feet may be presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary. Local serving retail generally improves the convenience of shopping close to home and has the effect of 6 Note that a redevelopment project replacing an existing use would estimate the net increase in trips above trips what already exists.
7 This threshold ties directly to the OPR technical advisory and notes that CEQA provides a categorical exemption for existing facilities, including additions to existing structures of up to 10,000 square feet, so long as the project is in an area where public infrastructure is available to allow for maximum planned development and the project is not in an environmentally sensitive area. (CEQA Guidelines, § 15301, subd.(e)(2).) Typical project types for which trip generation increases relatively linearly with building footprint (i.e., general office building, single tenant office building, office park, and business park) generate or attract an additional 110-124 trips per 10,000 square feet. Therefore, absent substantial evidence otherwise, it is reasonable to conclude that the addition of 110 or fewer trips could be considered not to lead to a significant impact. 8 This number was estimated using rates from ITE’s Trip Generation Manual. Some industrial and warehousing tenants may generate traffic differently than what is documented in ITE. In these cases, documentation of the project generating less than 110 daily trips will be required for review and approval by the City Traffic Engineer. -12-

LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-21-4451-1 Covina Mixed-Use Overlay District
O:\JOB_FILE\4451\Report\4451-Rpt.doc
reducing vehicle travel. Any project that uses the designation of “local-serving” should be able to demonstrate that its users (employees, customers, visitors) would be existing within the community.

The project would not generate new “demand” for the project land uses but would meet the existing demand that would shorten the distance existing residents, employees, customers, or visitors would need to travel.

3.4 Impact Criteria and Methodology
As outlined in the City’s guidelines, a project would result in a significant project-generated VMT impact if either of the following conditions are satisfied:

1. The baseline project-generated VMT per service population exceeds the 15% below the SGVCOG Southeast subarea baseline VMT per service population, or

2. The cumulative project-generated VMT per service population exceeds 15% below the SGVCOG Southeast subarea baseline VMT per service population

3.5 Transportation Demand Management Measures
The VMT expected to be generated by each Project Area was forecast using the SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool. The SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool is designed to assist in screening and estimating project‐generated VMT for certain types of land use projects in the San Gabriel Valley and calculating VMT reductions associated with certain VMT‐reducing measures. The SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool utilizes the Southern California Association of Governments Regional Travel Demand Model (SCAG RTDM).

The SGVCOG VMT Estimation Tool estimates the effectiveness of potential VMT reduction strategies in addition to estimating whether a development project exceeds the VMT thresholds.

Strategies are built into the VMT Estimation Tool, covering several categories including parking, transit, education and encouragement, commute trip reductions, shared mobility, bicycle infrastructure, and neighborhood enhancements. These strategies address the potential VMT reductions available due to certain types of project site modifications, programming, and operational changes which are collectively known as Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies.

The effectiveness of each strategy is primarily based on research documented in Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures (CAPCOA, 2010)9
. The VMT Estimation Tool utilizes the
methodology provided in the CAPCOA document directly. A detailed review of the TDM strategies included in the VMT Estimation Tool, including the definitions, benefits, and applicability of each measure, is presented in Attachment D to the City’s Guidelines, VMT Reduction Strategies.

3.6 Project VMT Analysis
The VMT expected to be generated by each Project Area was forecast using the SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool. A summary of the VMT assessment for each Project Area is provided in Table 3- 9 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures, California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), 2010.
-13-

LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-21-4451-1 Covina Mixed-Use Overlay District
O:\JOB_FILE\4451\Report\4451-Rpt.doc

1. As shown, 10 of the 13 Project Areas screen out from a full VMT assessment. The remaining 3 Project Areas result in Low VMT with application of the Increase Density TDM Measure, as described below.
• Increase Residential Density (T-1)
This measure accounts for the VMT reduction achieved by a project that is designed with a higher density of dwelling units (du) compared to the average residential density in the U.S.

Increased densities affect the distance people travel and provide greater options for the mode of travel they choose. Increasing residential density results in shorter and fewer trips by single-occupancy vehicles and thus a reduction in GHG emissions.

Therefore, the project is presumed to result in a less than significant transportation impact. Copies of the detailed SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool reports for each Project Area are contained in Appendix A.

3.7 Summary of Cumulative VMT Analysis
As stated in the City’s Guidelines (refer to page 18), analyses should consider both short-term and long-term project effects on VMT. Short-term effects are evaluated in the detailed project-level VMT analysis summarized above. Long-term, or cumulative, effects are determined through a consistency check with the Southern California Association of Government’s (SCAG’s) Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS). The RTP/SCS is the regional plan that demonstrates compliance with air quality conformity requirements and greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction targets. As such, projects that are consistent with this plan in terms of development, location, density, and intensity, are part of the regional solution for meeting air pollution and GHG reduction goals. Projects that are deemed to be consistent would have a less than significant cumulative impact on VMT. Development in a location where the RTP/SCS does not specify any development may indicate a significant impact on transportation. However, as noted in the City’s Guidelines, for projects that do not demonstrate a project impact by applying an efficiency-based impact threshold (i.e., VMT per capita, VMT per employee, or VMT per service population) in the impact analysis, a less than significant project impact conclusion is sufficient in demonstrating there is no cumulative VMT impact. Projects that fall under the City’s efficiencybased impact thresholds are already shown to align with the long-term VMT and GHG reduction goals of SCAG’s RTP/SCS. The City’s Guidelines also note that projects which do demonstrate VMT impacts through application of efficiency-based thresholds, and which are deemed inconsistent with the RTP/SCS, could contribute toward a significant cumulative impact on VMT. Therefore, no cumulative VMT impacts are anticipated.
-14-

Table 3-1

VMT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY
Project
Area Inside TPA Low VMT Project Type With Project Project + Reductions VMT Reductions Area A X 31.9 -
Area B X 31.9 -
Area C X 40.3 -
Area D X 35.6/33.2 -
Area E X 34.1 -
Area F 34.7/34.7 28.6/31.2 Increase Density
Area G 34.7/34.7 31.3/24.8 Increase Density
Area H X 38.9 -
Area I X X 38.9 -
Area J 34 32.4 Increase Density
Area K X X 33 -
Area L X 33 -
Area M X 24.2 -
[1] Sources: San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments' VMT Estimation Tool and City of Covina Transportation Study Guidelines, October 2020.

Screening Summary Total VMT per Service Population
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-21-4451-1 Covina Mixed-Use Overlay District
-15-

LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-21-4451-1 Covina Mixed-Use Overlay District
O:\JOB_FILE\4451\Report\4451-Rpt.doc

4.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
• Project Description – The Project consists of adding a new chapter of mixed-use overlay regulations to the City’s Zoning Ordinance and amending the City’s Official Zoning Map through the addition of a MUOD to various sites. The sites comprise a total of 141 parcels within 13 Project Areas throughout the City, excluding the Covina Town Center Specific Plan area. The total acreage is approximately 74.83 with parcels less than 1 acre in size having a density range of 14 to 22 units per acre and parcels of more than 1.01 acres in size having a density range of 22 to 40 units per acre. The assumption is that 60 percent of the total approximate 74.83 acres would be allocated for residential uses at an average density of 30 dwelling units per acre, resulting in an estimated 1,360 proposed dwelling units. • Project Trip Generation – The proposed project is expected to generate 504 vehicle trips (117 inbound trips and 387 outbound trips) during the weekday AM peak hour. During the weekday PM peak hour, the proposed project is expected to generate 529 vehicle trips (323 inbound trips and 206 outbound trips). Over a 24-hour period, the proposed project is forecast to generate 6,174 daily trip ends during a typical weekday (3,087 inbound trips and 3,087 outbound trips).

This trip generation forecast is considered very conservative, in that no specific vehicle trip generation credits have been applied to the forecast to account for existing and occupied land uses that may be demolished as part of any future entitlement application. • VMT Analysis: The project is presumed to result in a less than significant transportation impact.

Further, based on the project-related VMT analysis and the conclusions reported in Section 3.6, no cumulative VMT impacts are anticipated.
-16-

LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 1-21-4451-1 Covina Mixed-Use Overlay District

APPENDIX A

SGVCOG VMT ESTIMATION TOOL WORKSHEETS

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Project Details
Timestamp of Analysis: March 02, 2022, 05:09:53 PM
Project Name: Covina MUOD
Project Description: Area A
Project Location
jurisdiction:

Covina
Inside a TPA?
No (Fail)
apn TAZ 8406-001-018 22355100 8406-001-021 22355100
8406-001-028 22355100 8406-001-029 22355100 8406-001-034 22355100 8406-001-037 22355100 8406-001-042 22355100 8406-001-044 22355100 8406-001-045 22355100
Analysis Details
Data Version: SCAG Regional Travel Demand Model
2016 RTP Base Year 2012
Analysis Methodology: TAZ
Baseline Year: 2022
Project Land Use
Residential:

Single Family DU:

Multifamily DU: 133
Total DUs: 133
Non-Residential:

OKce bSF:

Local Serving Retail bSF:

Industrial bSF:

Residential Affordaxility (percent of all units):

Ewtremely Lo% Income: 0 k
Very Lo% Income: 0 k
Lo% Income: 0 k
ParWing:

Motor Vehicle ParWing:

Bicycle ParWing:
.c
l/l
...,
IU
"O
0 C
..,
....
"' \!)
0 ..,

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Residential Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Results Land Use Type 1: Residential
VMT .ithout Project 1: Total VMT per Service Population VMT Baseline Description 1: Suxarea
VMT Baseline Value 1: 39J5
VMT Threshold Description 1: -15k
Land Use 1 has xeen Pre-Screened xy the Local /urisdiction: N&A .ithout Project .ith Project E Tier 1-3 VMT
Reductions
.ith Project E All VMT Reductions
Project Generated Vehicle Miles
Traveled (VMT) Rate
31J9 31J9 31J9
Lo% VMT Screening Analysis Yes (Pass) Yes (Pass) Yes (Pass) 35 30 . . . . .
. ('O 25 . . . ......
·5.
8 20 II ■■■■
. .
-.. 15 t-
. . ~
> 10 . . . . . 5 . . 0

33.57 . . - - - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • 19.1 • • " • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • 31.9 . . . . . . . . . . VMT Metric Value Before Project 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ••••••••• .
.
.
.
.

VMT With Project and
Tier 1-3 VMT
Reductions
•••••••••
VMT With Project and
All VMT Reductions
- Land Use 1 Threshold VMT: 33.57 ■ ■ ■ Land Use 1 Max Reduction Possible: 19.1 ■ VMT Values

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Project Details
Timestamp of Analysis: March 02, 2022, 05:14:44 PM
Project Name: Covina MUOD
Project Description: Area B
Project Location
jurisdiction:

Covina
Inside a TPA?
No (Fail)
apn TAZ
8407-032-002 22355200
Analysis Details
Data Version: SCAG Regional Travel Demand Model
2016 RTP Base Year 2012
Analysis Methodology: TAZ
Baseline Year: 2022
Project Land Use
Residential:

Single Family DU:

Multifamily DU: 113
Total DUs: 113
Non-Residential:

OKce bSF:

Local Serving Retail bSF:

Industrial bSF:

Residential Affordaxility (percent of all units):

Ewtremely Lo% Income: 0 k
Very Lo% Income: 0 k
Lo% Income: 0 k
ParWing:

Motor Vehicle ParWing:

Bicycle ParWing:

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Residential Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Results Land Use Type 1: Residential
VMT 9ithout Project 1: Total VMT per Service Population VMT Baseline Description 1: Suxarea
VMT Baseline Value 1: 3.J5
VMT Threshold Description 1: -15k
Land Use 1 has xeen Pre-Screened xy the Local /urisdiction: N&A 9ithout Project 9ith Project E Tier 1-3 VMT
Reductions
9ith Project E All VMT Reductions
Project Generated Vehicle Miles
Traveled (VMT) Rate
31J. 31J. 31J.

Lo% VMT Screening Analysis Yes (Pass) Yes (Pass) Yes (Pass) 35 30 . . . . .
. ('O 25 . . . ......
·5.
8 20 II ■■■■
. .
-.. 15 t-
. . ~
> 10 . . . . . 5 . . 0

33.57 . . - - - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • 19.1 • • " • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • 31.9 . . . . . . . . . . VMT Metric Value Before Project 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ••••••••• .
.
.
.
.

VMT With Project and
Tier 1-3 VMT
Reductions
•••••••••
VMT With Project and
All VMT Reductions
- Land Use 1 Threshold VMT: 33.57 ■ ■ ■ Land Use 1 Max Reduction Possible: 19.1 ■ VMT Values

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Project Details
Timestamp of Analysis: March 02, 2022, 05:37:34 PM
Project Name: Covina MUOD
Project Description: Area C
Project Location
jurisdiction:

Covina
Inside a TPA?
Yes (Pass)
apn TAZ 8408-020-015 22330100 8408-020-018 22330100
8408-020-020 22330100 8408-020-022 22330100 8408-020-023 22330100 Analysis Details
Data Version: SCAG Regional Travel Demand Model
2016 RTP Base Year 2012
Analysis Methodology: TAZ
Baseline Year: 2022
Project Land Use
Residential:

Single Family DU:

Multifamily DU: 37
Total DUs: 37
Non-Residential:

OKce bSF:

Local Serving Retail bSF:

Industrial bSF:

Residential Affordaxility (percent of all units):

Ewtremely Lo% Income: 0 k
Very Lo% Income: 0 k
Lo% Income: 0 k
ParWing:

Motor Vehicle ParWing:

Bicycle ParWing:

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Residential Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Results Land Use Type 1: Residential
VMT 9ithout Project 1: Total VMT per Service Population VMT Baseline Description 1: Suxarea
VMT Baseline Value 1: 3.J5
VMT Threshold Description 1: -15k
Land Use 1 has xeen Pre-Screened xy the Local /urisdiction: N&A 9ithout Project 9ith Project E Tier 1-3 VMT
Reductions
9ith Project E All VMT Reductions
Project Generated Vehicle Miles
Traveled (VMT) Rate
40J3 40J3 40J3
Lo% VMT Screening Analysis No (Fail) No (Fail) No (Fail) ('O
......
·5.
('O
(.)
-..
t-
~
>
45 40
35 ' 33.57 . 30 . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 II ■■■■ 24.2 "." • 20 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 . . . . . . . . . • 40.3 . . 5 . . . . . . . . . . 0 VMT Metric Value
Before Project 1
••••••••• .
.
.
. .
.
.
.

VMT With Project and
Tier 1-3 VMT
Reductions
•••••••••
VMT With Project and
All VMT Reductions
- Land Use 1 Threshold VMT: 33.57 • • • Land Use 1 Max Reduction Possible: 24.2 ■ VMT Values

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Project Details
Timestamp of Analysis: March 02, 2022, 05:49:25 PM
Project Name: Covina MUOD
Project Description: Area D
Project Location
jurisdiction:

Covina
Inside a TPA?
Yes (Pass)
apn TAZ 8421-026-024 22336100 8421-026-025 22336100
8421-026-028 22336100 8422-001-008 22363300 8422-001-009 22363300 8422-001-011 22363300 8422-001-012 22363300 8422-001-013 22363300 8422-001-015 22363300 8422-001-016 22363300
Analysis Details
Data Version: SCAG Regional Travel Demand Model
2016 RTP Base Year 2012
Analysis Methodology: TAZ
Baseline Year: 2022
Project Land Use
Residential:

Single Family DU:

Multifamily DU: 159
Total DUs: 159
Non-Residential:

OKce bSF:

Local Serving Retail bSF:

Industrial bSF:

Residential Affordaxility (percent of all units):

Ewtremely Lo% Income: 0 k
Very Lo% Income: 0 k
Lo% Income: 0 k
ParWing:

Motor Vehicle ParWing:

Bicycle ParWing:
"O
:::J
lJ.J
f-
._
0 -0
3 1-
::i
...,
..., Vl Vl
"O 5'.
0 0
0 5'. .0 C C Cl) Cl) aJ
lJ.J
aJ
lJ.J
N FircroftAve
lJ.J
I
:::J
,._
Vl
...,
Vl
...,
°' lJ")
.....

JO JepaJ N

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Residential Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Results Land Use Type 1: Residential
VMT .ithout Project 1: Total VMT per Service Population VMT Baseline Description 1: Suxarea
VMT Baseline Value 1: 39J5
TAZ: 22336100
VMT Threshold Description 1: -15k
Land Use 1 has xeen Pre-Screened xy the Local /urisdiction: N&A .ithout Project .ith Project D Tier 1-3 VMT
Reductions
.ith Project D All VMT Reductions
Project Generated Vehicle Miles
Traveled (VMT) Rate
35J6 35J6 35J6
Lo% VMT Screening Analysis No (Fail) No (Fail) No (Fail) 40 35 ".".". '33.57 . . 30 . . . .. . . . . . . . . . ('O . . . . . . . . E. 25 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ('O (.) 20 ...... -.. 21.4 ". .
. . . . . t-
~ 15
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . > 10
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • 35.6 . . 5 • . . . . . . . . . 0 VMT Metric Value
Before Project 1
. .
.
.
.
.
. .
.
.
.
.
.
• ••••••••
VMT With Project and
Tier 1-3 VMT
Reductions
•••••••••
VMT With Project and
All VMT Reductions
- Land Use 1 Threshold VMT: 33.57 ■■■ Land Use 1 Max Reduction Possible: 21.4 ■ VMT Values

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Residential Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Results Land Use Type 1: Residential
VMT .ithout Project 1: Total VMT per Service Population VMT Baseline Description 1: Suxarea
VMT Baseline Value 1: 39J5
TAZ: 22363300
VMT Threshold Description 1: -15k
Land Use 1 has xeen Pre-Screened xy the Local /urisdiction: N&A .ithout Project .ith Project D Tier 1-3 VMT
Reductions
.ith Project D All VMT Reductions
Project Generated Vehicle Miles
Traveled (VMT) Rate
33J2 33J2 33J2
Lo% VMT Screening Analysis Yes (Pass) Yes (Pass) Yes (Pass) 35 ,33.57 . 30 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ('O 25 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... ·5.

C'O 20 II ■■•• (.)
. . . . . . . . . . . . •• 19.9' .•• . . . . . . ......... ~~~········· -.. 15 t- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . > 10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 . . • 33.2 . . • . . . . . . . . . . 0 VMT Metric Value VMT With Project and VMT With Project and Before Project 1 Tier 1-3 VMT All VMT Reductions
Reductions
- Land Use 1 Threshold VMT: 33.57 ••• Land Use 1 Max Reduction Possible: 19.9 ■ VMT Values

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Project Details
Timestamp of Analysis: March 03, 2022, 05:01:01 PM
Project Name: Covina MUOD
Project Description: Area E
Project Location
jurisdiction:

Covina
Inside a TPA?
No (Fail)
apn TAZ 8444-008-017 22353300 8444-008-019 22353300
8444-008-031 22353300 8444-008-032 22353300
Analysis Details
Data Version: SCAG Regional Travel Demand Model
2016 RTP Base Year 2012
Analysis Methodology: TAZ
Baseline Year: 2022
Project Land Use
Residential:

Single Family DU:

Multifamily DU: 24
Total DUs: 24
Non-Residential:

OKce bSF:

Local Serving Retail bSF:

Industrial bSF:

Residential Affordaxility (percent of all units):

Ewtremely Lo% Income: 0 k
Very Lo% Income: 0 k
Lo% Income: 0 k
ParWing:

Motor Vehicle ParWing:

Bicycle ParWing:

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Project Details
Timestamp of Analysis: March 02, 2022, 05:09:53 PM
Project Name: Covina MUOD
Project Description: Area A
Project Location
jurisdiction:

Covina
Inside a TPA?
No (Fail)
apn TAZ 8406-001-018 22355100 8406-001-021 22355100
8406-001-028 22355100 8406-001-029 22355100 8406-001-034 22355100 8406-001-037 22355100 8406-001-042 22355100 8406-001-044 22355100 8406-001-045 22355100
Analysis Details
Data Version: SCAG Regional Travel Demand Model
2016 RTP Base Year 2012
Analysis Methodology: TAZ
Baseline Year: 2022
Project Land Use
Residential:

Single Family DU:

Multifamily DU: 133
Total DUs: 133
Non-Residential:

OKce bSF:

Local Serving Retail bSF:

Industrial bSF:

Residential Affordaxility (percent of all units):

Ewtremely Lo% Income: 0 k
Very Lo% Income: 0 k
Lo% Income: 0 k
ParWing:

Motor Vehicle ParWing:

Bicycle ParWing:
.c
l/l
...,
IU
"O
0 C
..,
....
"' \!)
0 ..,

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Project Details
Timestamp of Analysis: March 02, 2022, 05:14:44 PM
Project Name: Covina MUOD
Project Description: Area B
Project Location
jurisdiction:

Covina
Inside a TPA?
No (Fail)
apn TAZ
8407-032-002 22355200
Analysis Details
Data Version: SCAG Regional Travel Demand Model
2016 RTP Base Year 2012
Analysis Methodology: TAZ
Baseline Year: 2022
Project Land Use
Residential:

Single Family DU:

Multifamily DU: 113
Total DUs: 113
Non-Residential:

OKce bSF:

Local Serving Retail bSF:

Industrial bSF:

Residential Affordaxility (percent of all units):

Ewtremely Lo% Income: 0 k
Very Lo% Income: 0 k
Lo% Income: 0 k
ParWing:

Motor Vehicle ParWing:

Bicycle ParWing:

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Project Details
Timestamp of Analysis: March 02, 2022, 05:09:53 PM
Project Name: Covina MUOD
Project Description: Area A
Project Location
jurisdiction:

Covina
Inside a TPA?
No (Fail)
apn TAZ 8406-001-018 22355100 8406-001-021 22355100
8406-001-028 22355100 8406-001-029 22355100 8406-001-034 22355100 8406-001-037 22355100 8406-001-042 22355100 8406-001-044 22355100 8406-001-045 22355100
Analysis Details
Data Version: SCAG Regional Travel Demand Model
2016 RTP Base Year 2012
Analysis Methodology: TAZ
Baseline Year: 2022
Project Land Use
Residential:

Single Family DU:

Multifamily DU: 133
Total DUs: 133
Non-Residential:

OKce bSF:

Local Serving Retail bSF:

Industrial bSF:

Residential Affordaxility (percent of all units):

Ewtremely Lo% Income: 0 k
Very Lo% Income: 0 k
Lo% Income: 0 k
ParWing:

Motor Vehicle ParWing:

Bicycle ParWing:
.c
l/l
...,
IU
"O
0 C
..,
....
"' \!)
0 ..,

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Project Details
Timestamp of Analysis: March 02, 2022, 05:14:44 PM
Project Name: Covina MUOD
Project Description: Area B
Project Location
jurisdiction:

Covina
Inside a TPA?
No (Fail)
apn TAZ
8407-032-002 22355200
Analysis Details
Data Version: SCAG Regional Travel Demand Model
2016 RTP Base Year 2012
Analysis Methodology: TAZ
Baseline Year: 2022
Project Land Use
Residential:

Single Family DU:

Multifamily DU: 113
Total DUs: 113
Non-Residential:

OKce bSF:

Local Serving Retail bSF:

Industrial bSF:

Residential Affordaxility (percent of all units):

Ewtremely Lo% Income: 0 k
Very Lo% Income: 0 k
Lo% Income: 0 k
ParWing:

Motor Vehicle ParWing:

Bicycle ParWing:

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Project Details
Timestamp of Analysis: March 02, 2022, 05:37:34 PM
Project Name: Covina MUOD
Project Description: Area C
Project Location
jurisdiction:

Covina
Inside a TPA?
Yes (Pass)
apn TAZ 8408-020-015 22330100 8408-020-018 22330100
8408-020-020 22330100 8408-020-022 22330100 8408-020-023 22330100 Analysis Details
Data Version: SCAG Regional Travel Demand Model
2016 RTP Base Year 2012
Analysis Methodology: TAZ
Baseline Year: 2022
Project Land Use
Residential:

Single Family DU:

Multifamily DU: 37
Total DUs: 37
Non-Residential:

OKce bSF:

Local Serving Retail bSF:

Industrial bSF:

Residential Affordaxility (percent of all units):

Ewtremely Lo% Income: 0 k
Very Lo% Income: 0 k
Lo% Income: 0 k
ParWing:

Motor Vehicle ParWing:

Bicycle ParWing:

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Project Details
Timestamp of Analysis: March 02, 2022, 05:49:25 PM
Project Name: Covina MUOD
Project Description: Area D
Project Location
jurisdiction:

Covina
Inside a TPA?
Yes (Pass)
apn TAZ 8421-026-024 22336100 8421-026-025 22336100
8421-026-028 22336100 8422-001-008 22363300 8422-001-009 22363300 8422-001-011 22363300 8422-001-012 22363300 8422-001-013 22363300 8422-001-015 22363300 8422-001-016 22363300
Analysis Details
Data Version: SCAG Regional Travel Demand Model
2016 RTP Base Year 2012
Analysis Methodology: TAZ
Baseline Year: 2022
Project Land Use
Residential:

Single Family DU:

Multifamily DU: 159
Total DUs: 159
Non-Residential:

OKce bSF:

Local Serving Retail bSF:

Industrial bSF:

Residential Affordaxility (percent of all units):

Ewtremely Lo% Income: 0 k
Very Lo% Income: 0 k
Lo% Income: 0 k
ParWing:

Motor Vehicle ParWing:

Bicycle ParWing:
"O
:::J
lJ.J
f-
._
0 -0
3 1-
::i
...,
..., Vl Vl
"O 5'.
0 0
0 5'. .0 C C Cl) Cl) aJ
lJ.J
aJ
lJ.J
N FircroftAve
lJ.J
I
:::J
,._
Vl
...,
Vl
...,
°' lJ")
.....

JO JepaJ N

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Project Details
Timestamp of Analysis: March 03, 2022, 05:01:01 PM
Project Name: Covina MUOD
Project Description: Area E
Project Location
jurisdiction:

Covina
Inside a TPA?
No (Fail)
apn TAZ 8444-008-017 22353300 8444-008-019 22353300
8444-008-031 22353300 8444-008-032 22353300
Analysis Details
Data Version: SCAG Regional Travel Demand Model
2016 RTP Base Year 2012
Analysis Methodology: TAZ
Baseline Year: 2022
Project Land Use
Residential:

Single Family DU:

Multifamily DU: 24
Total DUs: 24
Non-Residential:

OKce bSF:

Local Serving Retail bSF:

Industrial bSF:

Residential Affordaxility (percent of all units):

Ewtremely Lo% Income: 0 k
Very Lo% Income: 0 k
Lo% Income: 0 k
ParWing:

Motor Vehicle ParWing:

Bicycle ParWing:

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Project Details
Timestamp of Analysis: March 02, 2022, 05:37:34 PM
Project Name: Covina MUOD
Project Description: Area C
Project Location
jurisdiction:

Covina
Inside a TPA?
Yes (Pass)
apn TAZ 8408-020-015 22330100 8408-020-018 22330100
8408-020-020 22330100 8408-020-022 22330100 8408-020-023 22330100 Analysis Details
Data Version: SCAG Regional Travel Demand Model
2016 RTP Base Year 2012
Analysis Methodology: TAZ
Baseline Year: 2022
Project Land Use
Residential:

Single Family DU:

Multifamily DU: 37
Total DUs: 37
Non-Residential:

OKce bSF:

Local Serving Retail bSF:

Industrial bSF:

Residential Affordaxility (percent of all units):

Ewtremely Lo% Income: 0 k
Very Lo% Income: 0 k
Lo% Income: 0 k
ParWing:

Motor Vehicle ParWing:

Bicycle ParWing:

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Project Details
Timestamp of Analysis: March 02, 2022, 05:49:25 PM
Project Name: Covina MUOD
Project Description: Area D
Project Location
jurisdiction:

Covina
Inside a TPA?
Yes (Pass)
apn TAZ 8421-026-024 22336100 8421-026-025 22336100
8421-026-028 22336100 8422-001-008 22363300 8422-001-009 22363300 8422-001-011 22363300 8422-001-012 22363300 8422-001-013 22363300 8422-001-015 22363300 8422-001-016 22363300
Analysis Details
Data Version: SCAG Regional Travel Demand Model
2016 RTP Base Year 2012
Analysis Methodology: TAZ
Baseline Year: 2022
Project Land Use
Residential:

Single Family DU:

Multifamily DU: 159
Total DUs: 159
Non-Residential:

OKce bSF:

Local Serving Retail bSF:

Industrial bSF:

Residential Affordaxility (percent of all units):

Ewtremely Lo% Income: 0 k
Very Lo% Income: 0 k
Lo% Income: 0 k
ParWing:

Motor Vehicle ParWing:

Bicycle ParWing:
"O
:::J
lJ.J
f-
._
0 -0
3 1-
::i
...,
..., Vl Vl
"O 5'.
0 0
0 5'. .0 C C Cl) Cl) aJ
lJ.J
aJ
lJ.J
N FircroftAve
lJ.J
I
:::J
,._
Vl
...,
Vl
...,
°' lJ")
.....

JO JepaJ N

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Project Details
Timestamp of Analysis: March 03, 2022, 05:01:01 PM
Project Name: Covina MUOD
Project Description: Area E
Project Location
jurisdiction:

Covina
Inside a TPA?
No (Fail)
apn TAZ 8444-008-017 22353300 8444-008-019 22353300
8444-008-031 22353300 8444-008-032 22353300
Analysis Details
Data Version: SCAG Regional Travel Demand Model
2016 RTP Base Year 2012
Analysis Methodology: TAZ
Baseline Year: 2022
Project Land Use
Residential:

Single Family DU:

Multifamily DU: 24
Total DUs: 24
Non-Residential:

OKce bSF:

Local Serving Retail bSF:

Industrial bSF:

Residential Affordaxility (percent of all units):

Ewtremely Lo% Income: 0 k
Very Lo% Income: 0 k
Lo% Income: 0 k
ParWing:

Motor Vehicle ParWing:

Bicycle ParWing:

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Project Details
Timestamp of Analysis: March 02, 2022, 05:09:53 PM
Project Name: Covina MUOD
Project Description: Area A
Project Location
jurisdiction:

Covina
Inside a TPA?
No (Fail)
apn TAZ 8406-001-018 22355100 8406-001-021 22355100
8406-001-028 22355100 8406-001-029 22355100 8406-001-034 22355100 8406-001-037 22355100 8406-001-042 22355100 8406-001-044 22355100 8406-001-045 22355100
Analysis Details
Data Version: SCAG Regional Travel Demand Model
2016 RTP Base Year 2012
Analysis Methodology: TAZ
Baseline Year: 2022
Project Land Use
Residential:

Single Family DU:

Multifamily DU: 133
Total DUs: 133
Non-Residential:

OKce bSF:

Local Serving Retail bSF:

Industrial bSF:

Residential Affordaxility (percent of all units):

Ewtremely Lo% Income: 0 k
Very Lo% Income: 0 k
Lo% Income: 0 k
ParWing:

Motor Vehicle ParWing:

Bicycle ParWing:
.c
l/l
...,
IU
"O
0 C
..,
....
"' \!)
0 ..,

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Project Details
Timestamp of Analysis: March 02, 2022, 05:14:44 PM
Project Name: Covina MUOD
Project Description: Area B
Project Location
jurisdiction:

Covina
Inside a TPA?
No (Fail)
apn TAZ
8407-032-002 22355200
Analysis Details
Data Version: SCAG Regional Travel Demand Model
2016 RTP Base Year 2012
Analysis Methodology: TAZ
Baseline Year: 2022
Project Land Use
Residential:

Single Family DU:

Multifamily DU: 113
Total DUs: 113
Non-Residential:

OKce bSF:

Local Serving Retail bSF:

Industrial bSF:

Residential Affordaxility (percent of all units):

Ewtremely Lo% Income: 0 k
Very Lo% Income: 0 k
Lo% Income: 0 k
ParWing:

Motor Vehicle ParWing:

Bicycle ParWing:

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Project Details
Timestamp of Analysis: March 03, 2022, 05:01:01 PM
Project Name: Covina MUOD
Project Description: Area E
Project Location
jurisdiction:

Covina
Inside a TPA?
No (Fail)
apn TAZ 8444-008-017 22353300 8444-008-019 22353300
8444-008-031 22353300 8444-008-032 22353300
Analysis Details
Data Version: SCAG Regional Travel Demand Model
2016 RTP Base Year 2012
Analysis Methodology: TAZ
Baseline Year: 2022
Project Land Use
Residential:

Single Family DU:

Multifamily DU: 24
Total DUs: 24
Non-Residential:

OKce bSF:

Local Serving Retail bSF:

Industrial bSF:

Residential Affordaxility (percent of all units):

Ewtremely Lo% Income: 0 k
Very Lo% Income: 0 k
Lo% Income: 0 k
ParWing:

Motor Vehicle ParWing:

Bicycle ParWing:

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Project Details
Timestamp of Analysis: March 02, 2022, 05:09:53 PM
Project Name: Covina MUOD
Project Description: Area A
Project Location
jurisdiction:

Covina
Inside a TPA?
No (Fail)
apn TAZ 8406-001-018 22355100 8406-001-021 22355100
8406-001-028 22355100 8406-001-029 22355100 8406-001-034 22355100 8406-001-037 22355100 8406-001-042 22355100 8406-001-044 22355100 8406-001-045 22355100
Analysis Details
Data Version: SCAG Regional Travel Demand Model
2016 RTP Base Year 2012
Analysis Methodology: TAZ
Baseline Year: 2022
Project Land Use
Residential:

Single Family DU:

Multifamily DU: 133
Total DUs: 133
Non-Residential:

OKce bSF:

Local Serving Retail bSF:

Industrial bSF:

Residential Affordaxility (percent of all units):

Ewtremely Lo% Income: 0 k
Very Lo% Income: 0 k
Lo% Income: 0 k
ParWing:

Motor Vehicle ParWing:

Bicycle ParWing:
.c
l/l
...,
IU
"O
0 C
..,
....
"' \!)
0 ..,

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Project Details
Timestamp of Analysis: March 02, 2022, 05:14:44 PM
Project Name: Covina MUOD
Project Description: Area B
Project Location
jurisdiction:

Covina
Inside a TPA?
No (Fail)
apn TAZ
8407-032-002 22355200
Analysis Details
Data Version: SCAG Regional Travel Demand Model
2016 RTP Base Year 2012
Analysis Methodology: TAZ
Baseline Year: 2022
Project Land Use
Residential:

Single Family DU:

Multifamily DU: 113
Total DUs: 113
Non-Residential:

OKce bSF:

Local Serving Retail bSF:

Industrial bSF:

Residential Affordaxility (percent of all units):

Ewtremely Lo% Income: 0 k
Very Lo% Income: 0 k
Lo% Income: 0 k
ParWing:

Motor Vehicle ParWing:

Bicycle ParWing:

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Project Details
Timestamp of Analysis: March 02, 2022, 05:09:53 PM
Project Name: Covina MUOD
Project Description: Area A
Project Location
jurisdiction:

Covina
Inside a TPA?
No (Fail)
apn TAZ 8406-001-018 22355100 8406-001-021 22355100
8406-001-028 22355100 8406-001-029 22355100 8406-001-034 22355100 8406-001-037 22355100 8406-001-042 22355100 8406-001-044 22355100 8406-001-045 22355100
Analysis Details
Data Version: SCAG Regional Travel Demand Model
2016 RTP Base Year 2012
Analysis Methodology: TAZ
Baseline Year: 2022
Project Land Use
Residential:

Single Family DU:

Multifamily DU: 133
Total DUs: 133
Non-Residential:

OKce bSF:

Local Serving Retail bSF:

Industrial bSF:

Residential Affordaxility (percent of all units):

Ewtremely Lo% Income: 0 k
Very Lo% Income: 0 k
Lo% Income: 0 k
ParWing:

Motor Vehicle ParWing:

Bicycle ParWing:
.c
l/l
...,
IU
"O
0 C
..,
....
"' \!)
0 ..,

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Project Details
Timestamp of Analysis: March 02, 2022, 05:14:44 PM
Project Name: Covina MUOD
Project Description: Area B
Project Location
jurisdiction:

Covina
Inside a TPA?
No (Fail)
apn TAZ
8407-032-002 22355200
Analysis Details
Data Version: SCAG Regional Travel Demand Model
2016 RTP Base Year 2012
Analysis Methodology: TAZ
Baseline Year: 2022
Project Land Use
Residential:

Single Family DU:

Multifamily DU: 113
Total DUs: 113
Non-Residential:

OKce bSF:

Local Serving Retail bSF:

Industrial bSF:

Residential Affordaxility (percent of all units):

Ewtremely Lo% Income: 0 k
Very Lo% Income: 0 k
Lo% Income: 0 k
ParWing:

Motor Vehicle ParWing:

Bicycle ParWing:

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Project Details
Timestamp of Analysis: March 02, 2022, 05:37:34 PM
Project Name: Covina MUOD
Project Description: Area C
Project Location
jurisdiction:

Covina
Inside a TPA?
Yes (Pass)
apn TAZ 8408-020-015 22330100 8408-020-018 22330100
8408-020-020 22330100 8408-020-022 22330100 8408-020-023 22330100 Analysis Details
Data Version: SCAG Regional Travel Demand Model
2016 RTP Base Year 2012
Analysis Methodology: TAZ
Baseline Year: 2022
Project Land Use
Residential:

Single Family DU:

Multifamily DU: 37
Total DUs: 37
Non-Residential:

OKce bSF:

Local Serving Retail bSF:

Industrial bSF:

Residential Affordaxility (percent of all units):

Ewtremely Lo% Income: 0 k
Very Lo% Income: 0 k
Lo% Income: 0 k
ParWing:

Motor Vehicle ParWing:

Bicycle ParWing:

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Project Details
Timestamp of Analysis: March 02, 2022, 05:49:25 PM
Project Name: Covina MUOD
Project Description: Area D
Project Location
jurisdiction:

Covina
Inside a TPA?
Yes (Pass)
apn TAZ 8421-026-024 22336100 8421-026-025 22336100
8421-026-028 22336100 8422-001-008 22363300 8422-001-009 22363300 8422-001-011 22363300 8422-001-012 22363300 8422-001-013 22363300 8422-001-015 22363300 8422-001-016 22363300
Analysis Details
Data Version: SCAG Regional Travel Demand Model
2016 RTP Base Year 2012
Analysis Methodology: TAZ
Baseline Year: 2022
Project Land Use
Residential:

Single Family DU:

Multifamily DU: 159
Total DUs: 159
Non-Residential:

OKce bSF:

Local Serving Retail bSF:

Industrial bSF:

Residential Affordaxility (percent of all units):

Ewtremely Lo% Income: 0 k
Very Lo% Income: 0 k
Lo% Income: 0 k
ParWing:

Motor Vehicle ParWing:

Bicycle ParWing:
"O
:::J
lJ.J
f-
._
0 -0
3 1-
::i
...,
..., Vl Vl
"O 5'.
0 0
0 5'. .0 C C Cl) Cl) aJ
lJ.J
aJ
lJ.J
N FircroftAve
lJ.J
I
:::J
,._
Vl
...,
Vl
...,
°' lJ")
.....

JO JepaJ N

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Project Details
Timestamp of Analysis: March 03, 2022, 05:01:01 PM
Project Name: Covina MUOD
Project Description: Area E
Project Location
jurisdiction:

Covina
Inside a TPA?
No (Fail)
apn TAZ 8444-008-017 22353300 8444-008-019 22353300
8444-008-031 22353300 8444-008-032 22353300
Analysis Details
Data Version: SCAG Regional Travel Demand Model
2016 RTP Base Year 2012
Analysis Methodology: TAZ
Baseline Year: 2022
Project Land Use
Residential:

Single Family DU:

Multifamily DU: 24
Total DUs: 24
Non-Residential:

OKce bSF:

Local Serving Retail bSF:

Industrial bSF:

Residential Affordaxility (percent of all units):

Ewtremely Lo% Income: 0 k
Very Lo% Income: 0 k
Lo% Income: 0 k
ParWing:

Motor Vehicle ParWing:

Bicycle ParWing:

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Project Details
Timestamp of Analysis: March 02, 2022, 05:37:34 PM
Project Name: Covina MUOD
Project Description: Area C
Project Location
jurisdiction:

Covina
Inside a TPA?
Yes (Pass)
apn TAZ 8408-020-015 22330100 8408-020-018 22330100
8408-020-020 22330100 8408-020-022 22330100 8408-020-023 22330100 Analysis Details
Data Version: SCAG Regional Travel Demand Model
2016 RTP Base Year 2012
Analysis Methodology: TAZ
Baseline Year: 2022
Project Land Use
Residential:

Single Family DU:

Multifamily DU: 37
Total DUs: 37
Non-Residential:

OKce bSF:

Local Serving Retail bSF:

Industrial bSF:

Residential Affordaxility (percent of all units):

Ewtremely Lo% Income: 0 k
Very Lo% Income: 0 k
Lo% Income: 0 k
ParWing:

Motor Vehicle ParWing:

Bicycle ParWing:

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Project Details
Timestamp of Analysis: March 02, 2022, 05:49:25 PM
Project Name: Covina MUOD
Project Description: Area D
Project Location
jurisdiction:

Covina
Inside a TPA?
Yes (Pass)
apn TAZ 8421-026-024 22336100 8421-026-025 22336100
8421-026-028 22336100 8422-001-008 22363300 8422-001-009 22363300 8422-001-011 22363300 8422-001-012 22363300 8422-001-013 22363300 8422-001-015 22363300 8422-001-016 22363300
Analysis Details
Data Version: SCAG Regional Travel Demand Model
2016 RTP Base Year 2012
Analysis Methodology: TAZ
Baseline Year: 2022
Project Land Use
Residential:

Single Family DU:

Multifamily DU: 159
Total DUs: 159
Non-Residential:

OKce bSF:

Local Serving Retail bSF:

Industrial bSF:

Residential Affordaxility (percent of all units):

Ewtremely Lo% Income: 0 k
Very Lo% Income: 0 k
Lo% Income: 0 k
ParWing:

Motor Vehicle ParWing:

Bicycle ParWing:
"O
:::J
lJ.J
f-
._
0 -0
3 1-
::i
...,
..., Vl Vl
"O 5'.
0 0
0 5'. .0 C C Cl) Cl) aJ
lJ.J
aJ
lJ.J
N FircroftAve
lJ.J
I
:::J
,._
Vl
...,
Vl
...,
°' lJ")
.....

JO JepaJ N

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Project Details
Timestamp of Analysis: March 03, 2022, 05:01:01 PM
Project Name: Covina MUOD
Project Description: Area E
Project Location
jurisdiction:

Covina
Inside a TPA?
No (Fail)
apn TAZ 8444-008-017 22353300 8444-008-019 22353300
8444-008-031 22353300 8444-008-032 22353300
Analysis Details
Data Version: SCAG Regional Travel Demand Model
2016 RTP Base Year 2012
Analysis Methodology: TAZ
Baseline Year: 2022
Project Land Use
Residential:

Single Family DU:

Multifamily DU: 24
Total DUs: 24
Non-Residential:

OKce bSF:

Local Serving Retail bSF:

Industrial bSF:

Residential Affordaxility (percent of all units):

Ewtremely Lo% Income: 0 k
Very Lo% Income: 0 k
Lo% Income: 0 k
ParWing:

Motor Vehicle ParWing:

Bicycle ParWing:

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Project Details
Timestamp of Analysis: March 02, 2022, 05:09:53 PM
Project Name: Covina MUOD
Project Description: Area A
Project Location
jurisdiction:

Covina
Inside a TPA?
No (Fail)
apn TAZ 8406-001-018 22355100 8406-001-021 22355100
8406-001-028 22355100 8406-001-029 22355100 8406-001-034 22355100 8406-001-037 22355100 8406-001-042 22355100 8406-001-044 22355100 8406-001-045 22355100
Analysis Details
Data Version: SCAG Regional Travel Demand Model
2016 RTP Base Year 2012
Analysis Methodology: TAZ
Baseline Year: 2022
Project Land Use
Residential:

Single Family DU:

Multifamily DU: 133
Total DUs: 133
Non-Residential:

OKce bSF:

Local Serving Retail bSF:

Industrial bSF:

Residential Affordaxility (percent of all units):

Ewtremely Lo% Income: 0 k
Very Lo% Income: 0 k
Lo% Income: 0 k
ParWing:

Motor Vehicle ParWing:

Bicycle ParWing:
.c
l/l
...,
IU
"O
0 C
..,
....
"' \!)
0 ..,

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Project Details
Timestamp of Analysis: March 02, 2022, 05:14:44 PM
Project Name: Covina MUOD
Project Description: Area B
Project Location
jurisdiction:

Covina
Inside a TPA?
No (Fail)
apn TAZ
8407-032-002 22355200
Analysis Details
Data Version: SCAG Regional Travel Demand Model
2016 RTP Base Year 2012
Analysis Methodology: TAZ
Baseline Year: 2022
Project Land Use
Residential:

Single Family DU:

Multifamily DU: 113
Total DUs: 113
Non-Residential:

OKce bSF:

Local Serving Retail bSF:

Industrial bSF:

Residential Affordaxility (percent of all units):

Ewtremely Lo% Income: 0 k
Very Lo% Income: 0 k
Lo% Income: 0 k
ParWing:

Motor Vehicle ParWing:

Bicycle ParWing:

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Project Details
Timestamp of Analysis: March 02, 2022, 05:37:34 PM
Project Name: Covina MUOD
Project Description: Area C
Project Location
jurisdiction:

Covina
Inside a TPA?
Yes (Pass)
apn TAZ 8408-020-015 22330100 8408-020-018 22330100
8408-020-020 22330100 8408-020-022 22330100 8408-020-023 22330100 Analysis Details
Data Version: SCAG Regional Travel Demand Model
2016 RTP Base Year 2012
Analysis Methodology: TAZ
Baseline Year: 2022
Project Land Use
Residential:

Single Family DU:

Multifamily DU: 37
Total DUs: 37
Non-Residential:

OKce bSF:

Local Serving Retail bSF:

Industrial bSF:

Residential Affordaxility (percent of all units):

Ewtremely Lo% Income: 0 k
Very Lo% Income: 0 k
Lo% Income: 0 k
ParWing:

Motor Vehicle ParWing:

Bicycle ParWing:

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Project Details
Timestamp of Analysis: March 02, 2022, 05:49:25 PM
Project Name: Covina MUOD
Project Description: Area D
Project Location
jurisdiction:

Covina
Inside a TPA?
Yes (Pass)
apn TAZ 8421-026-024 22336100 8421-026-025 22336100
8421-026-028 22336100 8422-001-008 22363300 8422-001-009 22363300 8422-001-011 22363300 8422-001-012 22363300 8422-001-013 22363300 8422-001-015 22363300 8422-001-016 22363300
Analysis Details
Data Version: SCAG Regional Travel Demand Model
2016 RTP Base Year 2012
Analysis Methodology: TAZ
Baseline Year: 2022
Project Land Use
Residential:

Single Family DU:

Multifamily DU: 159
Total DUs: 159
Non-Residential:

OKce bSF:

Local Serving Retail bSF:

Industrial bSF:

Residential Affordaxility (percent of all units):

Ewtremely Lo% Income: 0 k
Very Lo% Income: 0 k
Lo% Income: 0 k
ParWing:

Motor Vehicle ParWing:

Bicycle ParWing:
"O
:::J
lJ.J
f-
._
0 -0
3 1-
::i
...,
..., Vl Vl
"O 5'.
0 0
0 5'. .0 C C Cl) Cl) aJ
lJ.J
aJ
lJ.J
N FircroftAve
lJ.J
I
:::J
,._
Vl
...,
Vl
...,
°' lJ")
.....

JO JepaJ N

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Project Details
Timestamp of Analysis: March 02, 2022, 05:37:34 PM
Project Name: Covina MUOD
Project Description: Area C
Project Location
jurisdiction:

Covina
Inside a TPA?
Yes (Pass)
apn TAZ 8408-020-015 22330100 8408-020-018 22330100
8408-020-020 22330100 8408-020-022 22330100 8408-020-023 22330100 Analysis Details
Data Version: SCAG Regional Travel Demand Model
2016 RTP Base Year 2012
Analysis Methodology: TAZ
Baseline Year: 2022
Project Land Use
Residential:

Single Family DU:

Multifamily DU: 37
Total DUs: 37
Non-Residential:

OKce bSF:

Local Serving Retail bSF:

Industrial bSF:

Residential Affordaxility (percent of all units):

Ewtremely Lo% Income: 0 k
Very Lo% Income: 0 k
Lo% Income: 0 k
ParWing:

Motor Vehicle ParWing:

Bicycle ParWing:

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Project Details
Timestamp of Analysis: March 02, 2022, 05:49:25 PM
Project Name: Covina MUOD
Project Description: Area D
Project Location
jurisdiction:

Covina
Inside a TPA?
Yes (Pass)
apn TAZ 8421-026-024 22336100 8421-026-025 22336100
8421-026-028 22336100 8422-001-008 22363300 8422-001-009 22363300 8422-001-011 22363300 8422-001-012 22363300 8422-001-013 22363300 8422-001-015 22363300 8422-001-016 22363300
Analysis Details
Data Version: SCAG Regional Travel Demand Model
2016 RTP Base Year 2012
Analysis Methodology: TAZ
Baseline Year: 2022
Project Land Use
Residential:

Single Family DU:

Multifamily DU: 159
Total DUs: 159
Non-Residential:

OKce bSF:

Local Serving Retail bSF:

Industrial bSF:

Residential Affordaxility (percent of all units):

Ewtremely Lo% Income: 0 k
Very Lo% Income: 0 k
Lo% Income: 0 k
ParWing:

Motor Vehicle ParWing:

Bicycle ParWing:
"O
:::J
lJ.J
f-
._
0 -0
3 1-
::i
...,
..., Vl Vl
"O 5'.
0 0
0 5'. .0 C C Cl) Cl) aJ
lJ.J
aJ
lJ.J
N FircroftAve
lJ.J
I
:::J
,._
Vl
...,
Vl
...,
°' lJ")
.....

JO JepaJ N

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Project Details
Timestamp of Analysis: March 03, 2022, 05:01:01 PM
Project Name: Covina MUOD
Project Description: Area E
Project Location
jurisdiction:

Covina
Inside a TPA?
No (Fail)
apn TAZ 8444-008-017 22353300 8444-008-019 22353300
8444-008-031 22353300 8444-008-032 22353300
Analysis Details
Data Version: SCAG Regional Travel Demand Model
2016 RTP Base Year 2012
Analysis Methodology: TAZ
Baseline Year: 2022
Project Land Use
Residential:

Single Family DU:

Multifamily DU: 24
Total DUs: 24
Non-Residential:

OKce bSF:

Local Serving Retail bSF:

Industrial bSF:

Residential Affordaxility (percent of all units):

Ewtremely Lo% Income: 0 k
Very Lo% Income: 0 k
Lo% Income: 0 k
ParWing:

Motor Vehicle ParWing:

Bicycle ParWing:

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Residential Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Results Land Use Type 1: Residential
VMT .ithout Project 1: Total VMT per Service Population VMT Baseline Description 1: Suxarea
VMT Baseline Value 1: 39J5
VMT Threshold Description 1: -15k
Land Use 1 has xeen Pre-Screened xy the Local /urisdiction: N&A .ithout Project .ith Project E Tier 1-3 VMT
Reductions
.ith Project E All VMT Reductions
Project Generated Vehicle Miles
Traveled (VMT) Rate
34J7 34J7 34J7
Lo% VMT Screening Analysis No (Fail) No (Fail) No (Fail) 35 30 . . . . .
. ('O 25 . . . ......
·g- 20 111 • • • •
(.)
. .
. -.. 15 t-
. . . . . ~ . > 10 . . . . . 5 . . 0
,33.57 . . . - - - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • ■ • ■ llf 210.8 ■ • ■ • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • 34.7 . . . . . . . . . . VMT Metric Value Before Project 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ••••••••• .
.
.
.
. .
.
.
.

VMT With Project and
Tier 1-3 VMT
Reductions
•••••••••
VMT With Project and
All VMT Reductions
- Land Use 1 Threshold VMT: 33.57 ■■■ Land Use 1 Max Reduction Possible: 20.8 ■ VMT Values

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Project Details
Timestamp of Analysis: March 02, 2022, 11:48:01 PM
Project Name: Covina MUOD
Project Description: Area F
Project Location
jurisdiction:

Covina
Inside a TPA?
No (Fail)
apn TAZ 8444-009-010 22353300 8444-021-004 22353200
8444-021-005 22353200 8444-022-001 22353200
Analysis Details
Data Version: SCAG Regional Travel Demand Model
2016 RTP Base Year 2012
Analysis Methodology: TAZ
Baseline Year: 2022
Project Land Use
Residential:

Single Family DU:

Multifamily DU: 154
Total DUs: 154
Non-Residential:

OKce bSF:

Local Serving Retail bSF:

Industrial bSF:

Residential Affordaxility (percent of all units):

Ewtremely Lo% Income: 0 k
Very Lo% Income: 0 k
Lo% Income: 0 k
ParWing:

Motor Vehicle ParWing:

Bicycle ParWing:
..__
-
-
S San Jose Ave
V)
...,
S 3rd Ave
V)
...,
3;:
u
<l)
c::
...,
<l)
....
3;:
0 <l)
X
...,
<l)
....

V)
...,
3;:
n:J
>,
a..
..., 0 n:J
V) "O
<l) c:: >
..., n:J n:J
c:: .:: z
<l) 0 :::J UJ
a.. UJ
S 1st Ave

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Residential Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Results Land Use Type 1: Residential
VMT .ithout Project 1: Total VMT per Service Population VMT Baseline Description 1: Suxarea
VMT Baseline Value 1: 39J5
TAZ: 22353200
VMT Threshold Description 1: -15k
Land Use 1 has xeen Pre-Screened xy the Local /urisdiction: N&A .ithout Project .ith Project 7 Tier 1-3 VMT
Reductions
.ith Project 7 All VMT Reductions
Project Generated Vehicle Miles
Traveled (VMT) Rate
34JE 28J6 28J6
Lo% VMT Screening Analysis No (Fail) Yes (Pass) Yes (Pass) 35 ,33.57 . 30 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ('O 25 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... ·g- 20 " ■ ■ ■ ■ (.)
. . . . . . . . . . • 20.8 . • • . . . . . ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ l"'ll al&£&£tm.W:aa_C&L Gil.~ ■■■■■■■■■ -.. 15 t-
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . > 10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 . . • 34.7 . . • . . . . . . . . . . 0 VMT Metric Value VMT With Project and VMT With Project and Before Project 1 Tier 1-3 VMT All VMT Reductions
Reductions
- Land Use 1 Threshold VMT: 33.57 ■■■ Land Use 1 Max Reduction Possible: 20.8 ■ VMT Values

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Residential Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Results Land Use Type 1: Residential
VMT .ithout Project 1: Total VMT per Service Population VMT Baseline Description 1: Suxarea
VMT Baseline Value 1: 39J5
TAZ: 22353300
VMT Threshold Description 1: -15k
Land Use 1 has xeen Pre-Screened xy the Local /urisdiction: N&A .ithout Project .ith Project 7 Tier 1-3 VMT
Reductions
.ith Project 7 All VMT Reductions
Project Generated Vehicle Miles
Traveled (VMT) Rate
34JE 31J2 31J2
Lo% VMT Screening Analysis No (Fail) Yes (Pass) Yes (Pass) 35 ,33.57 . 30 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ('O 25 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... ·g- 20 " ■ ■ ■ ■ (.)
. . . . . . . . . . • 20.8 . • • . . . . . ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ l"'ll al&£&£tm.W:aa_C&L Gil.~ ■■■■■■■■■ -.. 15 t-
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . > 10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 . . • 34.7 . . • . . . . . . . . . . 0 VMT Metric Value VMT With Project and VMT With Project and Before Project 1 Tier 1-3 VMT All VMT Reductions
Reductions
- Land Use 1 Threshold VMT: 33.57 ■■■ Land Use 1 Max Reduction Possible: 20.8 ■ VMT Values

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Tier 1 Project Characteristics
PC01 Increase Residential Density
Ewisting Residential Density: 8JE5
.ith Project Residential Density: 13J63 Page 406 of 858 SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Project Details
Timestamp of Analysis: March 03, 2022, 12:37:37 AM
Project Name: Covina MUOD
Project Description: Area G
Project Location
jurisdiction:

Covina
Inside a TPA?
No (Fail)
apn TAZ 8445-024-009 22353100 8445-024-010 22353100
8445-024-021 22353100 8445-025-006 22353100 8445-025-009 22353100 8445-025-010 22353100 8445-025-011 22353100 8445-025-022 22353100 8445-026-028 22353100 8445-026-029 22353100 8445-027-009 22353100 8445-027-010 22353100 8445-027-018 22353100 8445-027-023 22353100 8445-027-024 22353100 8445-027-029 22353100 8445-027-030 22353100 8445-028-011 22353100 8445-028-012 22353100 8445-028-025 22353100 8445-029-008 22353200 8445-029-014 22353200 8451-001-019 22353200 8451-001-020 22353200 8451-003-018 22353100 8451-003-019 22353100 8451-003-020 22353100 8451-003-024 22353100 8451-007-023 22353100 8451-007-024 22353100 8451-007-025 22353100 8451-007-026 22353100 8451-007-027 22353100 8451-007-028 22353100 8451-007-029 22353100 8451-007-030 22353100 8451-007-031 22353100 8451-007-032 22353100 8451-007-033 22353100 8451-007-034 22353100 8451-007-035 22353100 8451-007-048 22353100 8451-007-049 22353100 8451-007-050 22353100 8451-007-051 22353100 8451-007-052 22353100 8451-007-053 22353100 8451-007-054 22353100 8451-007-055 22353100 8451-008-009 22353100 8451-008-010 22353100 8451-008-011 22353100 8451-018-026 22353100 Analysis Details
Data Version: SCAG Regional Travel Demand Model
2016 RTP Base Year 2012
Analysis Methodology: TAZ
Baseline Year: 2022
Project Land Use
Residential:

Single Family DU:

Multifamily DU: 295
Total DUs: 295
Non-Residential:

OKce bSF:

Local Serving Retail bSF:

Industrial bSF:

Residential Affordaxility (percent of all units):

Ewtremely Lo% Income: 0 k
Very Lo% Income: 0 k
Lo% Income: 0 k
ParWing:

Motor Vehicle ParWing:

Bicycle ParWing:
- -0
V) 0
-0 0
C :;: QJ ro
en
QJ >
C <(
ro C
\,.. ro 0 E
LU -""
0 ,._
LU
$
3;:
ro
>,
a..
- 0 ro
V) -0
QJ C >
- ro ro
C I.. z
QJ 0 ::::, LU
a.. LU
LU

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Residential Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Results Land Use Type 1: Residential
VMT .ithout Project 1: Total VMT per Service Population VMT Baseline Description 1: Suxarea
VMT Baseline Value 1: 39J5
TAZ: 22353100
VMT Threshold Description 1: -15k
Land Use 1 has xeen Pre-Screened xy the Local /urisdiction: N&A .ithout Project .ith Project E Tier 1-3 VMT
Reductions
.ith Project E All VMT Reductions
Project Generated Vehicle Miles
Traveled (VMT) Rate
34J7 31J3 31J3
Lo% VMT Screening Analysis No (Fail) Yes (Pass) Yes (Pass) 35 ,33.57 . 30 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ('O 25 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... ·g- 20 " ■ ■ ■ ■ (.)
. . . . . . . . . . • 20.8 . • • . . . . . ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ l"'ll al&£&£tm.W:aa_C&L Gil.~ ■■■■■■■■■ -.. 15 t-
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . > 10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 . . • 34.7 . . • . . . . . . . . . . 0 VMT Metric Value VMT With Project and VMT With Project and Before Project 1 Tier 1-3 VMT All VMT Reductions
Reductions
- Land Use 1 Threshold VMT: 33.57 ■■■ Land Use 1 Max Reduction Possible: 20.8 ■ VMT Values

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Residential Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Results Land Use Type 1: Residential
VMT .ithout Project 1: Total VMT per Service Population VMT Baseline Description 1: Suxarea
VMT Baseline Value 1: 39J5
TAZ: 22353200
VMT Threshold Description 1: -15k
Land Use 1 has xeen Pre-Screened xy the Local /urisdiction: N&A .ithout Project .ith Project E Tier 1-3 VMT
Reductions
.ith Project E All VMT Reductions
Project Generated Vehicle Miles
Traveled (VMT) Rate
34J7 24J8 24J8
Lo% VMT Screening Analysis No (Fail) Yes (Pass) Yes (Pass) 35 ,33.57 . 30 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ('O 25 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... ·g- 20 " ■ ■ ■ ■ (.)
. . . . . . . . . . • 20.8 . • • . . . . . ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ l"'ll al&£&£tm.W:aa_C&L Gil.~ ■■■■■■■■■ -.. 15 t-
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . > 10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 . . • 34.7 . . • . . . . . . . . . . 0 VMT Metric Value VMT With Project and VMT With Project and Before Project 1 Tier 1-3 VMT All VMT Reductions
Reductions
- Land Use 1 Threshold VMT: 33.57 ■■■ Land Use 1 Max Reduction Possible: 20.8 ■ VMT Values

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Tier 1 Project Characteristics
PC01 Increase Residential Density
Ewisting Residential Density: 19J54
.ith Project Residential Density: 23J4 Page 410 of 858
SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Project Details
Timestamp of Analysis: March 03, 2022, 12:02:41 AM
Project Name: Covina MUOD
Project Description: Area H
Project Location
jurisdiction:

Covina
Inside a TPA?
Yes (Pass)
apn TAZ 8430-030-012 22356100 8430-030-027 22356100
8430-030-031 22356100 8430-030-033 22356100 8430-030-034 22356100 8430-030-035 22356100 8430-030-036 22356100 8430-030-037 22356100 8430-030-038 22356100 8430-032-012 22356100 8430-032-016 22356100 Analysis Details
Data Version: SCAG Regional Travel Demand Model
2016 RTP Base Year 2012
Analysis Methodology: TAZ
Baseline Year: 2022
Project Land Use
Residential:

Single Family DU:

Multifamily DU: 54
Total DUs: 54
Non-Residential:

OKce bSF:

Local Serving Retail bSF:

Industrial bSF:

Residential Affordaxility (percent of all units):

Ewtremely Lo% Income: 0 k
Very Lo% Income: 0 k
Lo% Income: 0 k
ParWing:

Motor Vehicle ParWing:

Bicycle ParWing:

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Residential Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Results Land Use Type 1: Residential
VMT 9ithout Project 1: Total VMT per Service Population VMT Baseline Description 1: Suxarea
VMT Baseline Value 1: 3.J5
VMT Threshold Description 1: -15k
Land Use 1 has xeen Pre-Screened xy the Local /urisdiction: N&A 9ithout Project 9ith Project F Tier 1-3 VMT
Reductions
9ith Project F All VMT Reductions
Project Generated Vehicle Miles
Traveled (VMT) Rate
38J. 38J. 38J.

Lo% VMT Screening Analysis No (Fail) No (Fail) No (Fail) 40 35 . . . . . . . •• •• •• '33.57 . 30 . . .. . . . . . . . . . . ('O . . . . . . . . . E. 25 ('O •••••
. . . . . . . . • ■ ■ • : 23.3 ia ■ 11 ■ . ......... ~~········· (.) 20 -... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . t- ~ 15
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . > 10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • 3-8.9 . . 5 . . . . . . . . . . . 0 VMT Metric Value VMT With Project and VMT With Project and Before Project 1 Tier 1-3 VMT All VMT Reductions
Reductions
- Land Use 1 Threshold VMT: 33.57 ■■■ Land Use 1 Max Reduction Possible: 23-.3 ■ VMT Values

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Project Details
Timestamp of Analysis: March 03, 2022, 12:05:23 AM
Project Name: Covina MUOD
Project Description: Area I
Project Location
jurisdiction:

Covina
Inside a TPA?
Yes (Pass)
apn TAZ 8430-034-006 22356100 8430-034-024 22356100
8430-034-028 22356100 8430-034-029 22356100 8430-034-030 22356100 Analysis Details
Data Version: SCAG Regional Travel Demand Model
2016 RTP Base Year 2012
Analysis Methodology: TAZ
Baseline Year: 2022
Project Land Use
Residential:

Single Family DU:

Multifamily DU: 24
Total DUs: 24
Non-Residential:

OKce bSF:

Local Serving Retail bSF:

Industrial bSF:

Residential Affordaxility (percent of all units):

Ewtremely Lo% Income: 0 k
Very Lo% Income: 0 k
Lo% Income: 0 k
ParWing:

Motor Vehicle ParWing:

Bicycle ParWing:
:.i -
r

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Residential Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Results Land Use Type 1: Residential
VMT .ithout Project 1: Total VMT per Service Population VMT Baseline Description 1: Suxarea
VMT Baseline Value 1: 39J5
VMT Threshold Description 1: -15k
Land Use 1 has xeen Pre-Screened xy the Local /urisdiction: N&A .ithout Project .ith Project D Tier 1-3 VMT
Reductions
.ith Project D All VMT Reductions
Project Generated Vehicle Miles
Traveled (VMT) Rate
38J9 38J9 38J9
Lo% VMT Screening Analysis No (Fail) No (Fail) No (Fail) 40 35 . . . . . . . •• •• •• '33.57 . 30 . . .. . . . . . . . . . . ('O . . . . . . . . . E. 25 ('O •••••
. . . . . . . . • ■ ■ • : 23.3 ia ■ 11 ■ . ......... ~~········· (.) 20 -... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . t- ~ 15
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . > 10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • 3-8.9 . . 5 . . . . . . . . . . . 0 VMT Metric Value VMT With Project and VMT With Project and Before Project 1 Tier 1-3 VMT All VMT Reductions
Reductions
- Land Use 1 Threshold VMT: 33.57 ■■■ Land Use 1 Max Reduction Possible: 23-.3 ■ VMT Values

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Project Details
Timestamp of Analysis: March 03, 2022, 12:10:08 AM
Project Name: Covina MUOD
Project Description: Area J
Project Location
jurisdiction:

Covina
Inside a TPA?
No (Fail)
apn TAZ 8429-032-001 22367300 8429-035-001 22367300
8429-035-004 22367300 8429-035-005 22367300 8429-035-006 22367300 8429-035-007 22367300 8429-035-008 22367300 8429-035-009 22367300 8429-035-012 22367300 8429-035-018 22367300 8429-035-019 22367300 8429-035-020 22367300 8429-035-021 22367300
Analysis Details
Data Version: SCAG Regional Travel Demand Model
2016 RTP Base Year 2012
Analysis Methodology: TAZ
Baseline Year: 2022
Project Land Use
Residential:

Single Family DU:

Multifamily DU: 90
Total DUs: 90
Non-Residential:

OKce bSF:

Local Serving Retail bSF:

Industrial bSF:

Residential Affordaxility (percent of all units):

Ewtremely Lo% Income: 0 k
Very Lo% Income: 0 k
Lo% Income: 0 k
ParWing:

Motor Vehicle ParWing:

Bicycle ParWing:

E Hurst St E Hurst St
E Edna Pl a Page 415 of 858
SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Residential Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Results Land Use Type 1: Residential
VMT .ithout Project 1: Total VMT per Service Population VMT Baseline Description 1: Suxarea
VMT Baseline Value 1: 39/5
VMT Threshold Description 1: -15k
Land Use 1 has xeen Pre-Screened xy the Local Jurisdiction: N&A .ithout Project .ith Project E Tier 1-3 VMT
Reductions
.ith Project E All VMT Reductions
Project Generated Vehicle Miles
Traveled (VMT) Rate
34 32/4 32/4
Lo% VMT Screening Analysis No (Fail) Yes (Pass) Yes (Pass) 35 30
('O 25 ......
·g- 20
(.)
-.. 15 t-
~
> 10
5 0
,33.57 . . . . . - - - . . • . . ~--·· 27.2 " • • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . 34 • . . . . . . . . . . . . VMT Metric Value Before Project 1
. ••••••••• .
.
.
. .
.
.
.
.
. .
.
.
• •••••••••
VMT With Project and
Tier 1-3 VMT
Reductions
VMT With Project and
All VMT Reductions
- Land Use 1 Threshold VMT: 33.57 ••• Land Use 1 Max Reduction Possible: 27.2 ■ VMT Values

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Tier 1 Project Characteristics
PC01 Increase Residential Density
Ewisting Residential Density: 8/95
.ith Project Residential Density: 10/11 Page 417 of 858 SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Project Details
Timestamp of Analysis: March 03, 2022, 12:15:34 AM
Project Name: Covina MUOD
Project Description: Area K
Project Location
jurisdiction:

Covina
Inside a TPA?
Yes (Pass)
apn TAZ 8434-002-011 22327200 8434-002-013 22327200
8434-002-014 22327200 8434-002-018 22327200 8434-002-021 22327200 8434-002-024 22327200 8434-003-014 22327200 8434-003-015 22327200 8434-003-016 22327200 8434-003-017 22327200 8434-003-018 22327200 8434-003-019 22327200 8434-003-022 22327200 8434-004-020 22327200 8434-004-023 22327200 8434-004-033 22327200 8434-016-010 22327200 8434-016-011 22327200 8434-016-033 22327200 8434-016-037 22327200 Analysis Details
Data Version: SCAG Regional Travel Demand Model
2016 RTP Base Year 2012
Analysis Methodology: TAZ
Baseline Year: 2022
Project Land Use
Residential:

Single Family DU:

Multifamily DU: 95
Total DUs: 95
Non-Residential:

Obce KSF:

Local Serving Retail KSF:

Industrial KSF:

Residential Affordaxility (percent of all units):

Ewtremely Lo% Income: 0 k
Very Lo% Income: 0 k
Lo% Income: 0 k
ParWing:

Motor Vehicle ParWing:

Bicycle ParWing:

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Residential Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Results Land Use Type 1: Residential
VMT .ithout Project 1: Total VMT per Service Population VMT Baseline Description 1: Suxarea
VMT Baseline Value 1: 39J5
VMT Threshold Description 1: -15k
Land Use 1 has xeen Pre-Screened xy the Local /urisdiction: N&A .ithout Project .ith Project E Tier 1-3 VMT
Reductions
.ith Project E All VMT Reductions
Project Generated Vehicle Miles
Traveled (VMT) Rate
33 33 33
Lo% VMT Screening Analysis Yes (Pass) Yes (Pass) Yes (Pass) 35 30
('O 25

33.57 . . . . - - - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ·5. ......
ro 20 ., ■ ■ ■ ■
. . . . . . . . . -
(.)
. . . . . . . . . . . . •• 19.8 •. . . . . . . . . . ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ~~~ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ -.. 15 t-
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . > 10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . 5 . . . 33 • . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 VMT Metric Value VMT With Project and VMT With Project and Before Project 1 Tier 1-3 VMT All VMT Reductions
Reductions
- Land Use 1 Threshold VMT: 33.57 ■■■ Land Use 1 Max Reduction Possible: 19.8 ■ VMT Values

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Project Details
Timestamp of Analysis: March 03, 2022, 12:18:42 AM
Project Name: Covina MUOD
Project Description: Area L
Project Location
jurisdiction:

Covina
Inside a TPA?
No (Fail)
apn TAZ
8434-013-010 22327200
Analysis Details
Data Version: SCAG Regional Travel Demand Model
2016 RTP Base Year 2012
Analysis Methodology: TAZ
Baseline Year: 2022
Project Land Use
Residential:

Single Family DU:

Multifamily DU: 59
Total DUs: 59
Non-Residential:

OKce bSF:

Local Serving Retail bSF:

Industrial bSF:

Residential Affordaxility (percent of all units):

Ewtremely Lo% Income: 0 k
Very Lo% Income: 0 k
Lo% Income: 0 k
ParWing:

Motor Vehicle ParWing:

Bicycle ParWing:

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Residential Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Results Land Use Type 1: Residential
VMT .ithout Project 1: Total VMT per Service Population VMT Baseline Description 1: Suxarea
VMT Baseline Value 1: 39J5
VMT Threshold Description 1: -15k
Land Use 1 has xeen Pre-Screened xy the Local /urisdiction: N&A .ithout Project .ith Project E Tier 1-3 VMT
Reductions
.ith Project E All VMT Reductions
Project Generated Vehicle Miles
Traveled (VMT) Rate
33 33 33
Lo% VMT Screening Analysis Yes (Pass) Yes (Pass) Yes (Pass) 35 30
('O 25

33.57 . . . . - - - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ·5. ......
ro 20 ., ■ ■ ■ ■
. . . . . . . . . -
(.)
. . . . . . . . . . . . •• 19.8 •. . . . . . . . . . ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ~~~ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ -.. 15 t-
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . > 10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . 5 . . . 33 • . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 VMT Metric Value VMT With Project and VMT With Project and Before Project 1 Tier 1-3 VMT All VMT Reductions
Reductions
- Land Use 1 Threshold VMT: 33.57 ■■■ Land Use 1 Max Reduction Possible: 19.8 ■ VMT Values

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Project Details
Timestamp of Analysis: March 03, 2022, 12:25:17 AM
Project Name: Covina MUOD
Project Description: Area M
Project Location
jurisdiction:

Covina
Inside a TPA?
No (Fail)
apn TAZ 8435-033-017 22311200 8435-033-023 22311200
8435-033-024 22311200 8435-033-028 22311200
Analysis Details
Data Version: SCAG Regional Travel Demand Model
2016 RTP Base Year 2012
Analysis Methodology: TAZ
Baseline Year: 2022
Project Land Use
Residential:

Single Family DU:

Multifamily DU: 123
Total DUs: 123
Non-Residential:

OKce bSF:

Local Serving Retail bSF:

Industrial bSF:

Residential Affordaxility (percent of all units):

Ewtremely Lo% Income: 0 k
Very Lo% Income: 0 k
Lo% Income: 0 k
ParWing:

Motor Vehicle ParWing:

Bicycle ParWing:
,vi
I I II I 11 I I
E Badillo St
E Elgenia St
Jubilee
Christian
School
E G rovece nter St
E Louisa Ave

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Residential Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Results Land Use Type 1: Residential
VMT 9ithout Project 1: Total VMT per Service Population VMT Baseline Description 1: Suxarea
VMT Baseline Value 1: 3.J5
VMT Threshold Description 1: -15k
Land Use 1 has xeen Pre-Screened xy the Local /urisdiction: N&A 9ithout Project 9ith Project E Tier 1-3 VMT
Reductions
9ith Project E All VMT Reductions
Project Generated Vehicle Miles
Traveled (VMT) Rate
24J2 24J2 24J2
Lo% VMT Screening Analysis Yes (Pass) Yes (Pass) Yes (Pass) 35 30
('O 25 ......
·g- 20
(.) . .
. -.. 15 ., •••• t-
. . ~
> 10 . . . . . 5 . . 0
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 ••• 14.5,. 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • 24.2 . . . . . . . . . . VMT Metric Value Before Project 1
.
.
. ••••••••• .
.
.
.

VMT With Project and
Tier 1-3 VMT
Reductions
•••••••••
VMT With Project and
All VMT Reductions
- Land Use 1 Threshold VMT: 33.57 ••• Land Use 1 Max Reduction Possible: 14.5 ■ VMT Values

Appendix E
Tribal Consultation Supporting
Documentation

125 East College Street• Covina, CA 91 723-2 199
March 29, 2022
Andrew Salas, Chairperson
Gabrielino Band of Mission Indian-Kish Nation
P.O. Box 393
Covina, CA 91723
www.covinaca.gov
(626) 384-5400
Re: Formal Notification of City of Covina's Mixed-Use Overlay District Project Pursuant toAssembly Bill 52 Dear Mr. Andrew Salas:

The City of Covina (City) is contacting you in compliance with the California Assembly Bill (AB) 52 (including the California Public Resources Code Section 21080.3.1) because you are listed as the contact person in a tribal request for notice of proposed projects in this geographic area for which the City is the lead agency in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act.

The City proposes the addition of a new chapter of mixed-use overlay regulations to the City's Zoning Code, as well as amending the City's Official Zoning Map through the addition of a mixeduse overlay district (MUOD) to various sites located in 141 parcels within 13 Project Areas throughout the City (excluding the Covina Town Center Specific Plan) within the San Gabriel Valley of Los Angeles County (Figures 1 and 2). The purpose of the MUOD is to guide and regulate future mixed-use development under the policies and objectives of the Mixed-Use land use category as established in the City's General Plan. The total acreage for the parcels is approximately 74.83. The existing site conditions of the 13 Project Areas consist of developed lots generally comprising of commercial uses, asphalt surface parking lots, and ornamental landscaping and trees.

If you wish to initiate formal consultation under AB 52, the deadline to request consultation with the City is set by State law [California Public Resources Code Section 21080.3. I ( d)] and requires that you send a written request for consultation to the address below within 30 days of the receipt of this notice. Please send written responses for the proposed project to:

Nancy Fong, AICP
Community Development Consultant
City of Covina
125 E College Street
Covina, CA 91 723

If you do not wish to initiate formal consultation on this proposed project, no response to this notice is needed. If you do not wish to formally consult under AB 52 on this proposed project, you may participate in the California Environmental Quality Act process for this project on any issue of concern as an interested California Native American tribe, person, citizen, or member of the public.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 626-384-5463 or email address at [email protected].

Enclosures:

Figure 1: Regional Location Map
Figure 2: Local Vicinity Map

SOURCE: ESRI
r- ESA
City of Covina's Mixed-Use Overlay District Project
Figure 1
Regional Location Map

N Lark Ellen Ave
N Enid Ave
E Orkney St
E Queenside Dr N Vincent Ave
N Azusa Ave
Irwindale
Vincent
S California Ave
N Lark Ellen Ave
E Workman Ave
W Service Ave
E Service Ave
E Idahome St
W San Bernardino Rd
N Vincent Ave
N Su
nset Ave
W Puente Ave E Puente Ave
N Azusa Ave
E Badillo St
S Azusa Ave
W Badillo St
The Lakes
Plaza West
Covina
West Covina
High School
st Covina
E Cienega Ave
E Covina Blvd
W Edna Pl
E Ruddock St
E Benbow St
E Edna Pl
E Benwood St
E Front St
E Cypress St
E San Bernardino Rd
N Citrus Ave
W San Bernardino Rd
S Grand Ave N Grand Ave
E Ar
W Arrow Hwy row Hwy
Oakdale
Memorial Park
Kahler Russell
Park
Charter Oak
W Rowland St E Rowland St
E Italia St
E Ga rvey Ave N
E Workman AveS Barranca St
E Garve y Ave S
E Cortez St
S Hollenbeck St
E Virginia Ave
E Holt Ave
E Rio Verde Dr
W Center St
S 2nd Av
S Citrus A
e
ve
W Puente St E Puente St E Puente St S Citrus St S Grand Ave S
Grand
Ave
W Badillo St E Badillo St
San Bernardino Fwy
Eastland Center
The Row
Royal Oak
Middle School
Covina
E Covina Blvd
E Ruddock St
W Cypress Ave
Eaton Rd
E Juanita Ave
Bonnie Cove Ave N Bonnie Cove Ave
S Valley Center Ave
Claraday St
N Sunflower Ave
E Cypress St
E Arrow Hwy
E Badillo St
Charter Oak
High School
10 Avenida Loma Vis
E Holt Ave
E Covina Hills Rd
E Mesarica Rd
Calle Cristina
Puente Ave
E Puente St
San Bernardino Fwy
Forest Lawn
Memorial Park
Covina Hills
Via Verde
Country Club
Path: U:\GIS\GIS\Projects\2021xxx\D202100759_01_Covina_MUOD\03_MXDs_Projects\Project_Description.aprx, sgeissler 6/1/2022 SOURCE: Mapbox, 2021
0 2,000
Feet
City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project
Figure 2
Local Vicinity Map
N
Proposed Mixed-Use Parcels
City of Covina
r- ESA
~

1 Fatima Clark
From: Brian Allee
Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2022 10:18 AM
To: Fatima Clark; Candace Ehringer
Subject: FW: Early Consultation per AB 52
Attachments: AB 52_ Covina MUOD_03-29-22 consultation request ltr.pdf Please see below for your records and for you to save in the folder. Thanks.

Brian J. Allee
Managing Associate
ESA | Environmental Science Associates
949.870.1536 direct
559.901.7985 mobile
From: Nancy Fong <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2022 10:11 AM
To: Brian Allee <[email protected]>
Subject: FW: Early Consultation per AB 52
Hi Brian,
FYI and for your record. I did not send the SB 18 letter of request because there is no general plan amendment. Thanks.

Nancy
From: Gabrieleno Administration <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, April 4, 2022 2:54 PM
To: Nancy Fong <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Early Consultation per AB 52
Hello Nancy
Thank you for your email. If there isn't going to be any ground disturbance taking place there will be no need for consultation. However we ask that you please notify us in the future if there will be ground disturbance occurring.

Thank you
Brandy Salas
Admin Specialist
Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians - Kizh Nation
PO Box 393
Covina, CA 91723
Office: 844-390-0787
website: www.gabrielenoindians.org

2 The region where Gabrieleño culture thrived for more than eight centuries encompassed most of Los Angeles County, more than half of Orange County and portions of Riverside and San Bernardino counties. It was the labor of the Gabrieleño who built the missions, ranchos and the pueblos of Los Angeles. They were trained in the trades, and they did the construction and maintenance, as well as the farming and managing of herds of livestock. “The Gabrieleño are the ones who did all this work, and they really are the foundation of the early economy of the Los Angeles area “ . “That’s a contribution that Los Angeles has not recognized--the fact that in its early decades, without the Gabrieleño, the community simply would not have survived.” On Mon, Apr 4, 2022 at 9:19 AM Nancy Fong <[email protected]> wrote:

Good morning,

There will not be any ground disturbances. However, Kizh Nation may provide comments indicating that any future physical development or redevelopment of the sites will require compliance with AB 52.

Nancy

From: Gabrieleno Administration <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2022 3:18 PM
To: Nancy Fong <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Early Consultation per AB 52

Hello Nancy

Thank you for your email. Will there be any type of Ground disturbances taking place?

Admin Specialist
Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians - Kizh Nation
PO Box 393
Covina, CA 91723
, !l OFAfzy
- >
,1 ~

3 Office: 844-390-0787
website: www.gabrielenoindians.org
The region where Gabrieleño culture thrived for more than eight centuries encompassed most of Los Angeles County, more than half of Orange County and portions of Riverside and San Bernardino counties. It was the labor of the Gabrieleño who built the missions, ranchos and the pueblos of Los Angeles. They were trained in the trades, and they did the construction and maintenance, as well as the farming and managing of herds of livestock. “The Gabrieleño are the ones who did all this work, and they really are the foundation of the early economy of the Los Angeles area “ . “That’s a contribution that Los Angeles has not recognized--the fact that in its early decades, without the Gabrieleño, the community simply would not have survived.”

On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 3:41 PM Nancy Fong <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi Andy,

Attached is a letter of request for early consultation for establishing a new Mixed-Use Overlay Regulations for the Zoning Code and Zone Changes for 141 parcels by adding the Mixed-Use Overlay District to the underlying Commercial or industrial zoned properties. The purpose of the proposed Mixed-Use Overlay regulations and related Zone Changes is to meet the Housing Element RHNA numbers. The 141 parcels we have selected to receive the proposed Mixed-Use Overlay Zone are all developed with buildings and parking areas except for one parcel. We are hoping for repurposing and redeveloping these parcels sometime in the future. There is absolutely no disturbances of the ground for these selected 141 parcels. If and when there is a future development project in those Mixed-Use Overlay zoned properties, additional early consultation will be required per AB 52.

Please let us know whether your tribe request a consultation and if so please provide us with your written comments. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 626-384-5463 or mobile at 909-856-0307. Thanks.

Sincerely,

4 Nancy

Nancy Fong, AICP | Community Development Consultant
Community Development | 125 E. College Street | Covina, CA 91723 (626) 384-5463| Email: [email protected] | www.covinaca.gov Go Green! Please consider the environment before printing this email.

This email and any information and/or files transmitted /attached with it may contain confidential information that is exempt from disclosure under applicable law, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. No right to confidentiality is waived by this email transmission. If you are not the intended recipient, or responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, dissemination, distribution, or use of any of the information contained in or attached to this transmission is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please destroy the original transmission and its attachments without reading or saving them in any manner. Thank you.

-7-

EXHIBIT C
ZONE CHANGE (ZCH) 22-03

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

EXHIBIT C
ZONING CODE AMENDMENT 22-03

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING

PROGRAM

0 Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program
SECTION 4
Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program

1.1 CEQA Requirements
Table 4-1 is a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) for the City’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project, which has been prepared pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15097 and Public Resources Code Section 21081.6. This MMRP lists all applicable mitigation measures from the IS/MND. The appropriate timing of implementation and responsible party are identified to ensure proper enforcement of the mitigation measures from the IS/MND to reduce Project impacts to less than significant levels. Mitigation measures are presented in the same order as they occur in the IS/MND.

The columns in the MMRP table provide the following information:
• Mitigation Measure(s): The action(s) that will be taken to reduce the impact to a less than significant level.
• Implementation Action: The action(s) listed out, according to the identified mitigation measure that would be implemented by the responsible agency. • Responsible Implementation Agency: The agency or private entity responsible for ensuring implementation of the mitigation measure. For the Project, the City of Covina, as the CEQA Lead Agency, remains responsible for ensuring that implementation of the mitigation measures occur in accordance with the MMRP (CEQA Guidelines Section 15097(a)). • Timing of Verification: The general timing for implementing each mitigation measure. • Verification Date: The date in which the mitigation measure has been completed.

The MMRP will be kept on file at the following address:

City of Covina, Community Development Department
125 E. College Avenue
Covina CA 91723

0 Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program
TABLE 4-1
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM FOR THE CITY OF COVINA’S MIXED-USE OVERLAY DISTRICT PROJECT Mitigation Measure Implementation Action
Responsible Implementation
Agency/Party
Timing of
Verification
Verification
Date
Air Quality
Mitigation Measure AIR-1: Construction Emissions. If, during subsequent project-level environmental review, construction-related criteria air pollutants are determined to have the potential to exceed the applicable South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) thresholds of significance, the City shall require applicants for future development and redevelopment associated with the Project to incorporate one or more of the following mitigation measures as necessary to reduce air pollutant emissions during construction activities to below the applicable SCAQMD thresholds of significance. Mitigation measures that may be identified during the environmental review include, but are not limited to:

1. Using construction equipment rated by the USEPA as having Tier 3 (model year 2006 or newer) or Tier 4 (model year 2008 or newer) emission limits, applicable for engines between 50 and 750 horsepower, as commercially available.

2. Using construction equipment that are equipped with a California Air Resources Board (CARB) verified Level 3 diesel particulate matter filter, applicable for engines between 50 and 750 horsepower, as commercially available.

3. Ensuring construction equipment is properly serviced and maintained to the manufacturer’s standards.

4. Limiting nonessential idling of construction equipment to less than five consecutive minutes at a location.

5. Water all active construction areas at least three times daily or four times daily if needed to control dust emissions. Watering should be sufficient to prevent airborne dust from leaving the site. Reclaimed water should be used whenever possible.

6. Increased watering frequency may be necessary whenever wind speeds exceed 15 miles per hour. Construction activities should be suspended during periods with wind speed gusts of 25 miles per hour or more.

7. Apply non-toxic chemical soil stabilizers, in lieu of watering, in sufficient quantities to control dust emissions and prevent visible dust from leaving the construction site.

8. Pave, apply water three times daily or as often as necessary to control dust, or apply non-toxic chemical soil stabilizers on all unpaved access roads, parking areas, and staging areas at construction sites.

The City shall require
applicants for future
development and
redevelopment associated
with the Project to
incorporate one or more of
the following mitigation
measures as necessary to
reduce air pollutant
emissions during
construction activities to
below the applicable
SCAQMD thresholds of
significance.

City of Covina During project-level
environmental review.

0 Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Implementation Action
Responsible Implementation
Agency/Party
Timing of
Verification
Verification
Date

9. Cover all trucks hauling soil, sand, and other loose materials or require all trucks to maintain at least two feet of freeboard (i.e., the minimum required space between the top of the load and the top of the trailer).

10. Sweep daily (with water sweepers using reclaimed water if possible), or as often as needed, all paved access roads, parking areas, and staging areas at the construction site to control dust.

11. Sweep public streets daily (with water sweepers using reclaimed water if possible) in the vicinity of the Project Sites, or as often as needed, to keep streets free of visible soil material.

12. Hydroseed or apply non-toxic soil stabilizers to inactive construction areas.

13. Enclose, cover, water three times daily, or apply non-toxic chemical soil binders to exposed stockpiles (dirt, sand, etc.).

AIR-2: Architectural Coating VOC Emissions. If, during subsequent project-level environmental review, it is determined that construction or operation of a project has the potential to exceed the applicable South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) thresholds of significance for volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from architectural coating activities, the City shall require the use of Super-Compliant VOC-content architectural coatings (10 grams per liter or less of VOCs) to be used during application of paints and other architectural coatings. If Super-Compliant VOC-content architectural coatings cannot be utilized, the developer shall reduce the quantity of paints and other architectural coatings applied in any one day as necessary to reduce VOC emissions from all project sources to below the SCAQMD thresholds of significance for VOCs (i.e., to below 75 pounds of VOC per day during construction activities and below 55 pounds of VOC per day during operational activities).

The City shall require the use
of Super-Compliant VOCcontent architectural coatings
(10 grams per liter or less of
VOCs) to be used during
application of paints and
other architectural coatings.

City of Covina During project-level
environmental review.

AIR-3: Energy Conservation. The City shall require energy conservation measures during future project-level environmental review, which may include the following:
• Install Energy Star rated heating, cooling, lighting, and appliances. • Use of Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) equipment with a Seasonal Energy Efficiency Ratio (SEER) of 12 or higher. • Installation of water heaters with an energy factor of 0.92 or higher. • Install solar water heaters or tank-less water heaters. • Use passive solar cooling/heating.
• Use cool roofs and surfaces for residential and non-residential buildings. • Encourage strategic tree planting and shading to reduce building energy demand for cooling.

The City shall require energy
conservation measures
during future project-level
environmental review.

City of Covina During project-level
environmental review.

0 Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Implementation Action
Responsible Implementation
Agency/Party
Timing of
Verification
Verification
Date
• Encourage the use of electric building energy systems in place of building natural gas systems.

AIR-4: Transportation Efficiency. The City shall require transportation efficiency measures during future project-level environmental review, which may include the following:
• Implement transportation demand management (TDM) strategies to reduce VMT from project operations.
• Provide residents and employees of projects with information regarding public transportation options.
• Provide residents and employees of projects with bicycle parking facilities that meet or exceed municipal code requirements. • Provide residents and employees of projects with electric vehicle supply equipment that meet or exceed municipal code requirements.

The City shall require
transportation efficiency
measures during future
project-level environmental
review.

City of Covina During project-level
environmental review.

AIR-5: Stationary Sources. Applicants for new or modified stationary sources associated with the Project that: 1) have the potential to generate 40 or more diesel trucks per day and 2) are located within 1,000 feet of a sensitive land use (e.g. residential, schools, hospitals, nursing homes), as measured from the property line of the Project to the property line of the nearest sensitive use, shall submit a health risk assessment (HRA) to the County Department of Regional Planning prior to future discretionary project approval. The HRA shall be prepared in accordance with policies and procedures of the state Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) and the applicable air quality management district. If the HRA shows that the incremental cancer risk exceeds ten in one million (10E-06), particulate matter concentrations would exceed 2.5 μg/m3, or the appropriate noncancer hazard index exceeds 1.0, the applicant will be required to identify and demonstrate that best available control technologies for toxics (T BACTs) are capable of reducing potential cancer and noncancer risks to an acceptable level, including appropriate enforcement mechanisms.

T-BACTs may include, but are not limited to, restricting idling onsite or electrifying warehousing docks to reduce diesel particulate matter, or requiring use of newer equipment and/or vehicles. T-BACTs identified in the HRA shall be identified as mitigation measures in the environmental document and/or incorporated into the site development plan as a component of the Project.

Submit a health risk
assessment (HRA) to the
County Department of
Regional Planning prior to
future discretionary project
approval.

City of Covina
County Department of
Regional Planning
During project-level
environmental review.

Prior to future
discretionary project
approval.

AIR 6: Health Risk Assessment. Applicants shall submit a HRA to the County prior to future discretionary project approval for sensitive land uses associated with the Project within the following distances as measured from the property line of the Project to the property line of the source/edge of the nearest travel lane, from these facilities:
• Industrial facilities within 1,000 feet.

Applicants shall submit a
HRA to the County prior to
future discretionary project
approval for sensitive land
uses associated with the
Project.

City of Covina During project-level
environmental review.

Prior to future
discretionary project
approval.

0 Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Implementation Action
Responsible Implementation
Agency/Party
Timing of
Verification
Verification
Date
• Distribution centers (40 or more trucks per day) within 1,000 feet. • Major transportation projects (50,000 or more vehicles per day) within 1,000 feet.
• Gasoline dispensing facilities within 300 feet.
• The HRA shall be prepared in accordance with policies and procedures of the applicable Air Quality Management District. If the HRA shows that the incremental cancer risk exceeds ten in one million (10E-06) or the appropriate noncancer hazard index exceeds 1.0, the applicant will be required to identify and demonstrate that mitigation measures are capable of reducing potential cancer and non-cancer risks to an acceptable level (i.e., below ten in one million or a hazard index of 1.0), including appropriate enforcement mechanisms. Measures to reduce risk may include but are not limited to:
• Air intakes located away from high volume roadways and/or truck loading zones, unless it can be demonstrated to the County Department of Regional Planning that there are operational limitations. • Heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems of the buildings provided with appropriately sized maximum efficiency rating value (MERV) filters.

Biological Resources
Mitigation Measure BIO-1: Nesting Birds. Vegetation removal shall be conducted between September 1 and January 31, outside the typical nesting season for birds in the region. If vegetation removal must occur during the typical nesting season (February 1 – August 31), a qualified biologist shall conduct a pre-construction survey for active nests within areas that will be subject to vegetation removal, construction noise, and/or ground disturbances, including a 100 to 300-foot buffer around existing trees and landscaped areas, to identify any potential active nests. Buffer distances should be adjusted at the discretion of the biologist based on the location of the nest, species, and surrounding land uses. If no sign of nesting activity is observed, construction may proceed without potential impacts to nesting birds.

If an active nest is observed during the pre-construction clearance survey, an adequate buffer determined by the qualified biologist shall be established around the active nest depending on sensitivity of the species and proximity to construction activity and impact areas. Onsite construction monitoring may also be required to ensure that no direct or indirect impacts occur to the active nest or nesting activities. Construction activities shall be avoided within the buffer, unless otherwise approved by the monitoring biologist (e.g., vehicles could pass through buffer areas while jackhammering would be restricted). Buffers shall be clearly marked and defined to restrict certain Conduct all vegetation
removal between September
1 and January 31, outside
the typical nesting season for
birds in the region.

If vegetation removal must
occur during the typical
nesting season (February 1 –
August 31), a qualified
biologist shall conduct a preconstruction survey for active nests within areas that will be
subject to vegetation
removal, construction noise,
and/or ground disturbances,
including a 100 to 300-foot
buffer around existing trees
and landscaped areas, to
identify any potential active
nests.

City of Covina
Qualified Project Biologist
Project Contractor
Prior to and during
grading and/or
construction.

0 Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Implementation Action
Responsible Implementation
Agency/Party
Timing of
Verification
Verification
Date
activities where they could result in nest failure, and shall remain in place until nests are no longer active, as determined by the monitoring biologist.

If an active nest is observed
during the pre-construction
clearance survey, an
adequate buffer determined
by the qualified biologist shall
be established around the
active nest depending on
sensitivity of the species and
proximity to construction
activity and impact areas.

Cultural Resources
Mitigation Measure CUL-1: Prior to the issuance of ground disturbing activities of future development and redevelopment associated with the Project, the City shall retain a qualified archaeologist, defined as meeting the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards for archaeology, to conduct an archaeological resources assessment including:
a records search at the South Central Coastal Information Center; a Sacred Lands File search at the Native American Heritage Commission; a pedestrian field survey, where deemed appropriate by the qualified archaeologist; recordation of all identified archaeological resources on California Department of Parks and Recreation 523 forms; a subsurface archaeological sensitivity assessment; and preparation of a technical report documenting the methods and results of the study. If an archaeological resource is identified as a result of the survey, the qualified archaeologist will prepare and conduct a testing program to delineate the resource’s boundaries and identify presence/absence of subsurface deposits. The results of the testing will be included in the technical report. If an archaeological resource cannot be avoided, it shall be evaluated for significance. The qualified archaeologist shall also provide recommendations regarding archaeological and Native American monitoring, protection of avoided resources and/or recommendations for additional work or treatment of significant resources that will be affected by the Project. When assessing significance and developing treatment for resources that are Native American in origin, the City shall consult with local Native American Tribes.

Prior to the issuance of
ground disturbing activities of
future development and
redevelopment associated
with the Project, the City shall
retain a qualified
archaeologist.

If an archaeological resource
is identified as a result of the
survey, the qualified
archaeologist will prepare
and conduct a testing
program to delineate the
resource’s boundaries and
identify presence/absence of
subsurface deposits.

City of Covina
Qualified Archaeologist
Project Contractor
Prior to the issuance
of ground disturbing
activities.

Prior to
commencement of
excavation activities.

Mitigation Measure CUL-2: Prior to the issuance of ground disturbing activities of future development and redevelopment associated with the Project on parcels that contain or are adjacent to buildings or structures more than 45 years old, the City shall retain a qualified architectural historian, defined as meeting the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards for architectural history, to conduct a historic resources assessment including: a records search at the South Central Coastal Information Center; a review of pertinent archives and sources; a pedestrian field survey; recordation of all identified historic architectural Prior to the issuance of
ground disturbing activities of
future development and
redevelopment associated
with the Project on parcels
that contain or are adjacent
to buildings or structures
more than 45 years old, the
City of Covina
Qualified Architectural
Historian
Project Contractor
Prior to and during
grading and/or
construction.

0 Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Implementation Action
Responsible Implementation
Agency/Party
Timing of
Verification
Verification
Date
resources on California Department of Parks and Recreation 523 forms; evaluation of resources for listing in the California Register and for local listing; and preparation of a technical report documenting the methods and results of the assessment. All identified historical resources will be assessed for the Project’s potential to result in direct and/or indirect effects to those resources. The qualified architectural historian shall provide recommendations regarding additional work or treatment for historical resources that will be affected by the Project prior to their demolition or alteration. This could include but is not limited to compliance with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties, Historic American Buildings Survey (HABS) recordation, incorporation of interpretive elements into new construction, or commemoration.

In addition, the qualified architectural historian shall review project plans for future development and redevelopment associated with the Project adjacent to historical resources to ensure there will be no indirect effects.

City shall retain a qualified
architectural historian.

The qualified architectural
historian shall provide
recommendations regarding
additional work or treatment
for historical resources that
will be affected by the Project
prior to their demolition or
alteration.

Mitigation Measure CUL-3: If human remains are encountered, then the City or its contractor shall immediately halt work in the vicinity (within 50 feet) of the discovery and contact the Los Angeles County Coroner in accordance with Public Resources Code Section 5097.98 and Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, which requires that no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to the remains’ origin and disposition pursuant. If the County Coroner determines the remains are Native American, then the Coroner will notify the NAHC within 24 hours in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5(c), and Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. The NAHC shall then identify the person(s) thought to be the MLD. The MLD may, with the permission of the land owner, or their authorized representative, inspect the site of the discovery of the Native American remains and may recommend to the owner or the person responsible for the excavation work means for treating or disposing, with appropriate dignity, the human remains and any associated grave goods. The MLD shall complete their inspection and make their recommendation within 48 hours of being granted access by the landowner to inspect the discovery. The recommendation may include the scientific removal and nondestructive analysis of human remains and items associated with Native American burials. The City and the landowner shall discuss and confer with the MLD on all reasonable options regarding the MLD’s preferences for treatment.

Until the City and the landowner have conferred with the MLD, the contractor shall ensure that the immediate vicinity where the discovery occurred is not disturbed by further activity and is adequately protected according to generally accepted cultural or archaeological standards or practices, and that further activities take into account the possibility of multiple burials.

If human remains are
encountered, the contractor
should halt work in the
vicinity (within 100 feet) of
the find and contact the Los
Angeles County Coroner in
accordance with PRC
Section 5097.98 and Health
and Safety Code Section
7050.5. If the County
Coroner determines that the
remains are Native
American, the California
Native American Heritage
Commission (NAHC) will be
notified in accordance with
Health and Safety Code
Section 7050.5, subdivision
(c), and PRC Section
5097.98 (as amended by
Assembly Bill 2641). The
NAHC will designate a Most
Likely Descendent (MLD) for
the remains per PRC Section
5097.98.

City of Covina
Qualified Archaeologist
Project Contractor
Prior to and during
grading and/or
construction.