Agenda — Covina City Council, November 15, 2022 (part 8 of 8)

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Page 1 ends

Project Details
Timestamp of Analysis: March 03, 2022, 05:01:01 PM
Project Name: Covina MUOD
Project Description: Area E
Project Location
jurisdiction:

Covina
Inside a TPA?
No (Fail)
apn TAZ 8444-008-017 22353300 8444-008-019 22353300
8444-008-031 22353300 8444-008-032 22353300
Analysis Details
Data Version: SCAG Regional Travel Demand Model
2016 RTP Base Year 2012
Analysis Methodology: TAZ
Baseline Year: 2022
Project Land Use
Residential:

Single Family DU:

Multifamily DU: 24
Total DUs: 24
Non-Residential:

OKce bSF:

Local Serving Retail bSF:

Industrial bSF:

Residential Affordaxility (percent of all units):

Ewtremely Lo% Income: 0 k
Very Lo% Income: 0 k
Lo% Income: 0 k
ParWing:

Motor Vehicle ParWing:

Bicycle ParWing:

Page 806 of 858 ends

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Page 1 ends

Project Details
Timestamp of Analysis: March 02, 2022, 05:09:53 PM
Project Name: Covina MUOD
Project Description: Area A
Project Location
jurisdiction:

Covina
Inside a TPA?
No (Fail)
apn TAZ 8406-001-018 22355100 8406-001-021 22355100
8406-001-028 22355100 8406-001-029 22355100 8406-001-034 22355100 8406-001-037 22355100 8406-001-042 22355100 8406-001-044 22355100 8406-001-045 22355100
Analysis Details
Data Version: SCAG Regional Travel Demand Model
2016 RTP Base Year 2012
Analysis Methodology: TAZ
Baseline Year: 2022
Project Land Use
Residential:

Single Family DU:

Multifamily DU: 133
Total DUs: 133
Non-Residential:

OKce bSF:

Local Serving Retail bSF:

Industrial bSF:

Residential Affordaxility (percent of all units):

Ewtremely Lo% Income: 0 k
Very Lo% Income: 0 k
Lo% Income: 0 k
ParWing:

Motor Vehicle ParWing:

Bicycle ParWing:
.c
l/l
...,
IU
"O
0 C
..,
....
"' \!)
0 ..,

Page 807 of 858 ends

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Page 1 ends

Project Details
Timestamp of Analysis: March 02, 2022, 05:14:44 PM
Project Name: Covina MUOD
Project Description: Area B
Project Location
jurisdiction:

Covina
Inside a TPA?
No (Fail)
apn TAZ
8407-032-002 22355200
Analysis Details
Data Version: SCAG Regional Travel Demand Model
2016 RTP Base Year 2012
Analysis Methodology: TAZ
Baseline Year: 2022
Project Land Use
Residential:

Single Family DU:

Multifamily DU: 113
Total DUs: 113
Non-Residential:

OKce bSF:

Local Serving Retail bSF:

Industrial bSF:

Residential Affordaxility (percent of all units):

Ewtremely Lo% Income: 0 k
Very Lo% Income: 0 k
Lo% Income: 0 k
ParWing:

Motor Vehicle ParWing:

Bicycle ParWing:

Page 808 of 858 ends

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Page 1 ends

Project Details
Timestamp of Analysis: March 02, 2022, 05:37:34 PM
Project Name: Covina MUOD
Project Description: Area C
Project Location
jurisdiction:

Covina
Inside a TPA?
Yes (Pass)
apn TAZ 8408-020-015 22330100 8408-020-018 22330100
8408-020-020 22330100 8408-020-022 22330100 8408-020-023 22330100 Analysis Details
Data Version: SCAG Regional Travel Demand Model
2016 RTP Base Year 2012
Analysis Methodology: TAZ
Baseline Year: 2022
Project Land Use
Residential:

Single Family DU:

Multifamily DU: 37
Total DUs: 37
Non-Residential:

OKce bSF:

Local Serving Retail bSF:

Industrial bSF:

Residential Affordaxility (percent of all units):

Ewtremely Lo% Income: 0 k
Very Lo% Income: 0 k
Lo% Income: 0 k
ParWing:

Motor Vehicle ParWing:

Bicycle ParWing:

Page 809 of 858 ends

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Page 1 ends

Project Details
Timestamp of Analysis: March 02, 2022, 05:49:25 PM
Project Name: Covina MUOD
Project Description: Area D
Project Location
jurisdiction:

Covina
Inside a TPA?
Yes (Pass)
apn TAZ 8421-026-024 22336100 8421-026-025 22336100
8421-026-028 22336100 8422-001-008 22363300 8422-001-009 22363300 8422-001-011 22363300 8422-001-012 22363300 8422-001-013 22363300 8422-001-015 22363300 8422-001-016 22363300
Analysis Details
Data Version: SCAG Regional Travel Demand Model
2016 RTP Base Year 2012
Analysis Methodology: TAZ
Baseline Year: 2022
Project Land Use
Residential:

Single Family DU:

Multifamily DU: 159
Total DUs: 159
Non-Residential:

OKce bSF:

Local Serving Retail bSF:

Industrial bSF:

Residential Affordaxility (percent of all units):

Ewtremely Lo% Income: 0 k
Very Lo% Income: 0 k
Lo% Income: 0 k
ParWing:

Motor Vehicle ParWing:

Bicycle ParWing:
"O
:::J
lJ.J
f-
._
0 -0
3 1-
::i
...,
..., Vl Vl
"O 5'.
0 0
0 5'. .0 C C Cl) Cl) aJ
lJ.J
aJ
lJ.J
N FircroftAve
lJ.J
I
:::J
,._
Vl
...,
Vl
...,
°' lJ")
.....

JO JepaJ N

Page 810 of 858 ends

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Page 1 ends

Project Details
Timestamp of Analysis: March 02, 2022, 05:37:34 PM
Project Name: Covina MUOD
Project Description: Area C
Project Location
jurisdiction:

Single Family DU:

Multifamily DU: 37
Total DUs: 37
Non-Residential:

OKce bSF:

Local Serving Retail bSF:

Industrial bSF:

Residential Affordaxility (percent of all units):

Ewtremely Lo% Income: 0 k
Very Lo% Income: 0 k
Lo% Income: 0 k
ParWing:

Motor Vehicle ParWing:

Bicycle ParWing:

Page 811 of 858 ends

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Page 1 ends

Project Details
Timestamp of Analysis: March 02, 2022, 05:49:25 PM
Project Name: Covina MUOD
Project Description: Area D
Project Location
jurisdiction:

Single Family DU:

Multifamily DU: 159
Total DUs: 159
Non-Residential:

OKce bSF:

Local Serving Retail bSF:

Industrial bSF:

Residential Affordaxility (percent of all units):

Ewtremely Lo% Income: 0 k
Very Lo% Income: 0 k
Lo% Income: 0 k
ParWing:

Motor Vehicle ParWing:

Bicycle ParWing:
"O
:::J
lJ.J
f-
._
0 -0
3 1-
::i
...,
..., Vl Vl
"O 5'.
0 0
0 5'. .0 C C Cl) Cl) aJ
lJ.J
aJ
lJ.J
N FircroftAve
lJ.J
I
:::J
,._
Vl
...,
Vl
...,
°' lJ")
.....

JO JepaJ N

Page 812 of 858 ends

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Page 1 ends

Project Details
Timestamp of Analysis: March 03, 2022, 05:01:01 PM
Project Name: Covina MUOD
Project Description: Area E
Project Location
jurisdiction:

Single Family DU:

Multifamily DU: 24
Total DUs: 24
Non-Residential:

OKce bSF:

Local Serving Retail bSF:

Industrial bSF:

Residential Affordaxility (percent of all units):

Ewtremely Lo% Income: 0 k
Very Lo% Income: 0 k
Lo% Income: 0 k
ParWing:

Motor Vehicle ParWing:

Bicycle ParWing:

Page 813 of 858 ends

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Page 2 ends

Residential Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Results Land Use Type 1: Residential
VMT .ithout Project 1: Total VMT per Service Population VMT Baseline Description 1: Suxarea
VMT Baseline Value 1: 39J5
VMT Threshold Description 1: -15k
Land Use 1 has xeen Pre-Screened xy the Local /urisdiction: N&A .ithout Project .ith Project E Tier 1-3 VMT
Reductions
.ith Project E All VMT Reductions
Project Generated Vehicle Miles
Traveled (VMT) Rate
34J7 34J7 34J7
Lo% VMT Screening Analysis No (Fail) No (Fail) No (Fail) 35 30 . . . . .
. ('O 25 . . . ......
·g- 20 111 • • • •
(.)
. .
. -.. 15 t-
. . . . . ~ . > 10 . . . . . 5 . . 0
,33.57 . . . - - - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • ■ • ■ llf 210.8 ■ • ■ • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • 34.7 . . . . . . . . . . VMT Metric Value Before Project 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ••••••••• .
.
.
.
. .
.
.
.

VMT With Project and
Tier 1-3 VMT
Reductions
•••••••••
VMT With Project and
All VMT Reductions
- Land Use 1 Threshold VMT: 33.57 ■■■ Land Use 1 Max Reduction Possible: 20.8 ■ VMT Values

Page 814 of 858 ends

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Page 1 ends

Project Details
Timestamp of Analysis: March 02, 2022, 11:48:01 PM
Project Name: Covina MUOD
Project Description: Area F
Project Location
jurisdiction:

Covina
Inside a TPA?
No (Fail)
apn TAZ 8444-009-010 22353300 8444-021-004 22353200
8444-021-005 22353200 8444-022-001 22353200
Analysis Details
Data Version: SCAG Regional Travel Demand Model
2016 RTP Base Year 2012
Analysis Methodology: TAZ
Baseline Year: 2022
Project Land Use
Residential:

Single Family DU:

Multifamily DU: 154
Total DUs: 154
Non-Residential:

OKce bSF:

Local Serving Retail bSF:

Industrial bSF:

Residential Affordaxility (percent of all units):

Ewtremely Lo% Income: 0 k
Very Lo% Income: 0 k
Lo% Income: 0 k
ParWing:

Motor Vehicle ParWing:

Bicycle ParWing:
..__
-
-
S San Jose Ave
V)
...,
S 3rd Ave
V)
...,
3;:
u
<l)
c::
...,
<l)
....
3;:
0 <l)
X
...,
<l)
....

V)
...,
3;:
n:J
>,
a..
..., 0 n:J
V) "O
<l) c:: >
..., n:J n:J
c:: .:: z
<l) 0 :::J UJ
a.. UJ
S 1st Ave

Page 815 of 858 ends

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Page 2 ends

Residential Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Results Land Use Type 1: Residential
VMT .ithout Project 1: Total VMT per Service Population VMT Baseline Description 1: Suxarea
VMT Baseline Value 1: 39J5
TAZ: 22353200
VMT Threshold Description 1: -15k
Land Use 1 has xeen Pre-Screened xy the Local /urisdiction: N&A .ithout Project .ith Project 7 Tier 1-3 VMT
Reductions
.ith Project 7 All VMT Reductions
Project Generated Vehicle Miles
Traveled (VMT) Rate
34JE 28J6 28J6
Lo% VMT Screening Analysis No (Fail) Yes (Pass) Yes (Pass) 35 ,33.57 . 30 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ('O 25 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... ·g- 20 " ■ ■ ■ ■ (.)
. . . . . . . . . . • 20.8 . • • . . . . . ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ l"'ll al&£&£tm.W:aa_C&L Gil.~ ■■■■■■■■■ -.. 15 t-
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . > 10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 . . • 34.7 . . • . . . . . . . . . . 0 VMT Metric Value VMT With Project and VMT With Project and Before Project 1 Tier 1-3 VMT All VMT Reductions
Reductions
- Land Use 1 Threshold VMT: 33.57 ■■■ Land Use 1 Max Reduction Possible: 20.8 ■ VMT Values

Page 816 of 858 ends

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Page 3 ends

Residential Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Results Land Use Type 1: Residential
VMT .ithout Project 1: Total VMT per Service Population VMT Baseline Description 1: Suxarea
VMT Baseline Value 1: 39J5
TAZ: 22353300
VMT Threshold Description 1: -15k
Land Use 1 has xeen Pre-Screened xy the Local /urisdiction: N&A .ithout Project .ith Project 7 Tier 1-3 VMT
Reductions
.ith Project 7 All VMT Reductions
Project Generated Vehicle Miles
Traveled (VMT) Rate
34JE 31J2 31J2
Lo% VMT Screening Analysis No (Fail) Yes (Pass) Yes (Pass) 35 ,33.57 . 30 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ('O 25 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... ·g- 20 " ■ ■ ■ ■ (.)
. . . . . . . . . . • 20.8 . • • . . . . . ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ l"'ll al&£&£tm.W:aa_C&L Gil.~ ■■■■■■■■■ -.. 15 t-
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . > 10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 . . • 34.7 . . • . . . . . . . . . . 0 VMT Metric Value VMT With Project and VMT With Project and Before Project 1 Tier 1-3 VMT All VMT Reductions
Reductions
- Land Use 1 Threshold VMT: 33.57 ■■■ Land Use 1 Max Reduction Possible: 20.8 ■ VMT Values

Page 817 of 858 ends

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Page 4 ends

Tier 1 Project Characteristics
PC01 Increase Residential Density
Ewisting Residential Density: 8JE5
.ith Project Residential Density: 13J63 Page 818 of 858 SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Page 1 ends

Project Details
Timestamp of Analysis: March 03, 2022, 12:37:37 AM
Project Name: Covina MUOD
Project Description: Area G
Project Location
jurisdiction:

Covina
Inside a TPA?
No (Fail)
apn TAZ 8445-024-009 22353100 8445-024-010 22353100
8445-024-021 22353100 8445-025-006 22353100 8445-025-009 22353100 8445-025-010 22353100 8445-025-011 22353100 8445-025-022 22353100 8445-026-028 22353100 8445-026-029 22353100 8445-027-009 22353100 8445-027-010 22353100 8445-027-018 22353100 8445-027-023 22353100 8445-027-024 22353100 8445-027-029 22353100 8445-027-030 22353100 8445-028-011 22353100 8445-028-012 22353100 8445-028-025 22353100 8445-029-008 22353200 8445-029-014 22353200 8451-001-019 22353200 8451-001-020 22353200 8451-003-018 22353100 8451-003-019 22353100 8451-003-020 22353100 8451-003-024 22353100 8451-007-023 22353100 8451-007-024 22353100 8451-007-025 22353100 8451-007-026 22353100 8451-007-027 22353100 8451-007-028 22353100 8451-007-029 22353100 8451-007-030 22353100 8451-007-031 22353100 8451-007-032 22353100 8451-007-033 22353100 8451-007-034 22353100 8451-007-035 22353100 8451-007-048 22353100 8451-007-049 22353100 8451-007-050 22353100 8451-007-051 22353100 8451-007-052 22353100 8451-007-053 22353100 8451-007-054 22353100 8451-007-055 22353100 8451-008-009 22353100 8451-008-010 22353100 8451-008-011 22353100 8451-018-026 22353100 Analysis Details
Data Version: SCAG Regional Travel Demand Model
2016 RTP Base Year 2012
Analysis Methodology: TAZ
Baseline Year: 2022
Project Land Use
Residential:

Single Family DU:

Multifamily DU: 295
Total DUs: 295
Non-Residential:

OKce bSF:

Local Serving Retail bSF:

Industrial bSF:

Residential Affordaxility (percent of all units):

Ewtremely Lo% Income: 0 k
Very Lo% Income: 0 k
Lo% Income: 0 k
ParWing:

Motor Vehicle ParWing:

Bicycle ParWing:
- -0
V) 0
-0 0
C :;: QJ ro
en
QJ >
C <(
ro C
\,.. ro 0 E
LU -""
0 ,._
LU
$
3;:
ro
>,
a..
- 0 ro
V) -0
QJ C >
- ro ro
C I.. z
QJ 0 ::::, LU
a.. LU
LU

Page 819 of 858 ends

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Page 2 ends

Residential Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Results Land Use Type 1: Residential
VMT .ithout Project 1: Total VMT per Service Population VMT Baseline Description 1: Suxarea
VMT Baseline Value 1: 39J5
TAZ: 22353100
VMT Threshold Description 1: -15k
Land Use 1 has xeen Pre-Screened xy the Local /urisdiction: N&A .ithout Project .ith Project E Tier 1-3 VMT
Reductions
.ith Project E All VMT Reductions
Project Generated Vehicle Miles
Traveled (VMT) Rate
34J7 31J3 31J3
Lo% VMT Screening Analysis No (Fail) Yes (Pass) Yes (Pass) 35 ,33.57 . 30 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ('O 25 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... ·g- 20 " ■ ■ ■ ■ (.)
. . . . . . . . . . • 20.8 . • • . . . . . ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ l"'ll al&£&£tm.W:aa_C&L Gil.~ ■■■■■■■■■ -.. 15 t-
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . > 10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 . . • 34.7 . . • . . . . . . . . . . 0 VMT Metric Value VMT With Project and VMT With Project and Before Project 1 Tier 1-3 VMT All VMT Reductions
Reductions
- Land Use 1 Threshold VMT: 33.57 ■■■ Land Use 1 Max Reduction Possible: 20.8 ■ VMT Values

Page 820 of 858 ends

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Page 3 ends

Residential Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Results Land Use Type 1: Residential
VMT .ithout Project 1: Total VMT per Service Population VMT Baseline Description 1: Suxarea
VMT Baseline Value 1: 39J5
TAZ: 22353200
VMT Threshold Description 1: -15k
Land Use 1 has xeen Pre-Screened xy the Local /urisdiction: N&A .ithout Project .ith Project E Tier 1-3 VMT
Reductions
.ith Project E All VMT Reductions
Project Generated Vehicle Miles
Traveled (VMT) Rate
34J7 24J8 24J8
Lo% VMT Screening Analysis No (Fail) Yes (Pass) Yes (Pass) 35 ,33.57 . 30 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ('O 25 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... ·g- 20 " ■ ■ ■ ■ (.)
. . . . . . . . . . • 20.8 . • • . . . . . ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ l"'ll al&£&£tm.W:aa_C&L Gil.~ ■■■■■■■■■ -.. 15 t-
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . > 10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 . . • 34.7 . . • . . . . . . . . . . 0 VMT Metric Value VMT With Project and VMT With Project and Before Project 1 Tier 1-3 VMT All VMT Reductions
Reductions
- Land Use 1 Threshold VMT: 33.57 ■■■ Land Use 1 Max Reduction Possible: 20.8 ■ VMT Values

Page 821 of 858 ends

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Page 4 ends

Tier 1 Project Characteristics
PC01 Increase Residential Density
Ewisting Residential Density: 19J54
.ith Project Residential Density: 23J4 Page 822 of 858
SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Page 1 ends

Project Details
Timestamp of Analysis: March 03, 2022, 12:02:41 AM
Project Name: Covina MUOD
Project Description: Area H
Project Location
jurisdiction:

Covina
Inside a TPA?
Yes (Pass)
apn TAZ 8430-030-012 22356100 8430-030-027 22356100
8430-030-031 22356100 8430-030-033 22356100 8430-030-034 22356100 8430-030-035 22356100 8430-030-036 22356100 8430-030-037 22356100 8430-030-038 22356100 8430-032-012 22356100 8430-032-016 22356100 Analysis Details
Data Version: SCAG Regional Travel Demand Model
2016 RTP Base Year 2012
Analysis Methodology: TAZ
Baseline Year: 2022
Project Land Use
Residential:

Single Family DU:

Multifamily DU: 54
Total DUs: 54
Non-Residential:

OKce bSF:

Local Serving Retail bSF:

Industrial bSF:

Residential Affordaxility (percent of all units):

Ewtremely Lo% Income: 0 k
Very Lo% Income: 0 k
Lo% Income: 0 k
ParWing:

Motor Vehicle ParWing:

Bicycle ParWing:

Page 823 of 858 ends

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Page 2 ends

Lo% VMT Screening Analysis No (Fail) No (Fail) No (Fail) 40 35 . . . . . . . •• •• •• '33.57 . 30 . . .. . . . . . . . . . . ('O . . . . . . . . . E. 25 ('O •••••
. . . . . . . . • ■ ■ • : 23.3 ia ■ 11 ■ . ......... ~~········· (.) 20 -... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . t- ~ 15
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . > 10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • 3-8.9 . . 5 . . . . . . . . . . . 0 VMT Metric Value VMT With Project and VMT With Project and Before Project 1 Tier 1-3 VMT All VMT Reductions
Reductions
- Land Use 1 Threshold VMT: 33.57 ■■■ Land Use 1 Max Reduction Possible: 23-.3 ■ VMT Values

Page 824 of 858 ends

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Page 1 ends

Project Details
Timestamp of Analysis: March 03, 2022, 12:05:23 AM
Project Name: Covina MUOD
Project Description: Area I
Project Location
jurisdiction:

Covina
Inside a TPA?
Yes (Pass)
apn TAZ 8430-034-006 22356100 8430-034-024 22356100
8430-034-028 22356100 8430-034-029 22356100 8430-034-030 22356100 Analysis Details
Data Version: SCAG Regional Travel Demand Model
2016 RTP Base Year 2012
Analysis Methodology: TAZ
Baseline Year: 2022
Project Land Use
Residential:

Single Family DU:

Multifamily DU: 24
Total DUs: 24
Non-Residential:

OKce bSF:

Local Serving Retail bSF:

Industrial bSF:

Residential Affordaxility (percent of all units):

Ewtremely Lo% Income: 0 k
Very Lo% Income: 0 k
Lo% Income: 0 k
ParWing:

Motor Vehicle ParWing:

Bicycle ParWing:
:.i -
r

Page 825 of 858 ends

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Page 2 ends

Residential Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Results Land Use Type 1: Residential
VMT .ithout Project 1: Total VMT per Service Population VMT Baseline Description 1: Suxarea
VMT Baseline Value 1: 39J5
VMT Threshold Description 1: -15k
Land Use 1 has xeen Pre-Screened xy the Local /urisdiction: N&A .ithout Project .ith Project D Tier 1-3 VMT
Reductions
.ith Project D All VMT Reductions
Project Generated Vehicle Miles
Traveled (VMT) Rate
38J9 38J9 38J9
Lo% VMT Screening Analysis No (Fail) No (Fail) No (Fail) 40 35 . . . . . . . •• •• •• '33.57 . 30 . . .. . . . . . . . . . . ('O . . . . . . . . . E. 25 ('O •••••
. . . . . . . . • ■ ■ • : 23.3 ia ■ 11 ■ . ......... ~~········· (.) 20 -... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . t- ~ 15
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . > 10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • 3-8.9 . . 5 . . . . . . . . . . . 0 VMT Metric Value VMT With Project and VMT With Project and Before Project 1 Tier 1-3 VMT All VMT Reductions
Reductions
- Land Use 1 Threshold VMT: 33.57 ■■■ Land Use 1 Max Reduction Possible: 23-.3 ■ VMT Values

Page 826 of 858 ends

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Page 1 ends

Project Details
Timestamp of Analysis: March 03, 2022, 12:10:08 AM
Project Name: Covina MUOD
Project Description: Area J
Project Location
jurisdiction:

Covina
Inside a TPA?
No (Fail)
apn TAZ 8429-032-001 22367300 8429-035-001 22367300
8429-035-004 22367300 8429-035-005 22367300 8429-035-006 22367300 8429-035-007 22367300 8429-035-008 22367300 8429-035-009 22367300 8429-035-012 22367300 8429-035-018 22367300 8429-035-019 22367300 8429-035-020 22367300 8429-035-021 22367300
Analysis Details
Data Version: SCAG Regional Travel Demand Model
2016 RTP Base Year 2012
Analysis Methodology: TAZ
Baseline Year: 2022
Project Land Use
Residential:

Single Family DU:

Multifamily DU: 90
Total DUs: 90
Non-Residential:

OKce bSF:

Local Serving Retail bSF:

Industrial bSF:

Residential Affordaxility (percent of all units):

Ewtremely Lo% Income: 0 k
Very Lo% Income: 0 k
Lo% Income: 0 k
ParWing:

Motor Vehicle ParWing:

Bicycle ParWing:

E Hurst St E Hurst St
E Edna Pl a Page 827 of 858
SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Page 2 ends

Residential Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Results Land Use Type 1: Residential
VMT .ithout Project 1: Total VMT per Service Population VMT Baseline Description 1: Suxarea
VMT Baseline Value 1: 39/5
VMT Threshold Description 1: -15k
Land Use 1 has xeen Pre-Screened xy the Local Jurisdiction: N&A .ithout Project .ith Project E Tier 1-3 VMT
Reductions
.ith Project E All VMT Reductions
Project Generated Vehicle Miles
Traveled (VMT) Rate
34 32/4 32/4
Lo% VMT Screening Analysis No (Fail) Yes (Pass) Yes (Pass) 35 30
('O 25 ......
·g- 20
(.)
-.. 15 t-
~
> 10
5 0
,33.57 . . . . . - - - . . • . . ~--·· 27.2 " • • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . 34 • . . . . . . . . . . . . VMT Metric Value Before Project 1
. ••••••••• .
.
.
. .
.
.
.
.
. .
.
.
• •••••••••
VMT With Project and
Tier 1-3 VMT
Reductions
VMT With Project and
All VMT Reductions
- Land Use 1 Threshold VMT: 33.57 ••• Land Use 1 Max Reduction Possible: 27.2 ■ VMT Values

Page 828 of 858 ends

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Page 3 ends

Tier 1 Project Characteristics
PC01 Increase Residential Density
Ewisting Residential Density: 8/95
.ith Project Residential Density: 10/11 Page 829 of 858 SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Page 1 ends

Project Details
Timestamp of Analysis: March 03, 2022, 12:15:34 AM
Project Name: Covina MUOD
Project Description: Area K
Project Location
jurisdiction:

Covina
Inside a TPA?
Yes (Pass)
apn TAZ 8434-002-011 22327200 8434-002-013 22327200
8434-002-014 22327200 8434-002-018 22327200 8434-002-021 22327200 8434-002-024 22327200 8434-003-014 22327200 8434-003-015 22327200 8434-003-016 22327200 8434-003-017 22327200 8434-003-018 22327200 8434-003-019 22327200 8434-003-022 22327200 8434-004-020 22327200 8434-004-023 22327200 8434-004-033 22327200 8434-016-010 22327200 8434-016-011 22327200 8434-016-033 22327200 8434-016-037 22327200 Analysis Details
Data Version: SCAG Regional Travel Demand Model
2016 RTP Base Year 2012
Analysis Methodology: TAZ
Baseline Year: 2022
Project Land Use
Residential:

Single Family DU:

Multifamily DU: 95
Total DUs: 95
Non-Residential:

Obce KSF:

Local Serving Retail KSF:

Industrial KSF:

Residential Affordaxility (percent of all units):

Ewtremely Lo% Income: 0 k
Very Lo% Income: 0 k
Lo% Income: 0 k
ParWing:

Motor Vehicle ParWing:

Bicycle ParWing:

Page 830 of 858 ends

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Page 2 ends

33.57 . . . . - - - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ·5. ......
ro 20 ., ■ ■ ■ ■
. . . . . . . . . -
(.)
. . . . . . . . . . . . •• 19.8 •. . . . . . . . . . ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ~~~ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ -.. 15 t-
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . > 10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . 5 . . . 33 • . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 VMT Metric Value VMT With Project and VMT With Project and Before Project 1 Tier 1-3 VMT All VMT Reductions
Reductions
- Land Use 1 Threshold VMT: 33.57 ■■■ Land Use 1 Max Reduction Possible: 19.8 ■ VMT Values

Page 831 of 858 ends

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Page 1 ends

Project Details
Timestamp of Analysis: March 03, 2022, 12:18:42 AM
Project Name: Covina MUOD
Project Description: Area L
Project Location
jurisdiction:

Covina
Inside a TPA?
No (Fail)
apn TAZ
8434-013-010 22327200
Analysis Details
Data Version: SCAG Regional Travel Demand Model
2016 RTP Base Year 2012
Analysis Methodology: TAZ
Baseline Year: 2022
Project Land Use
Residential:

Single Family DU:

Multifamily DU: 59
Total DUs: 59
Non-Residential:

OKce bSF:

Local Serving Retail bSF:

Industrial bSF:

Residential Affordaxility (percent of all units):

Ewtremely Lo% Income: 0 k
Very Lo% Income: 0 k
Lo% Income: 0 k
ParWing:

Motor Vehicle ParWing:

Bicycle ParWing:

Page 832 of 858 ends

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Page 2 ends

Page 833 of 858 ends

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Page 1 ends

Project Details
Timestamp of Analysis: March 03, 2022, 12:25:17 AM
Project Name: Covina MUOD
Project Description: Area M
Project Location
jurisdiction:

Covina
Inside a TPA?
No (Fail)
apn TAZ 8435-033-017 22311200 8435-033-023 22311200
8435-033-024 22311200 8435-033-028 22311200
Analysis Details
Data Version: SCAG Regional Travel Demand Model
2016 RTP Base Year 2012
Analysis Methodology: TAZ
Baseline Year: 2022
Project Land Use
Residential:

Single Family DU:

Multifamily DU: 123
Total DUs: 123
Non-Residential:

OKce bSF:

Local Serving Retail bSF:

Industrial bSF:

Residential Affordaxility (percent of all units):

Ewtremely Lo% Income: 0 k
Very Lo% Income: 0 k
Lo% Income: 0 k
ParWing:

Motor Vehicle ParWing:

Bicycle ParWing:
,vi
I I II I 11 I I
E Badillo St
E Elgenia St
Jubilee
Christian
School
E G rovece nter St
E Louisa Ave

Page 834 of 858 ends

SGVCOG VMT Evaluation Tool Report

Page 2 ends

Residential Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Results Land Use Type 1: Residential
VMT 9ithout Project 1: Total VMT per Service Population VMT Baseline Description 1: Suxarea
VMT Baseline Value 1: 3.J5
VMT Threshold Description 1: -15k
Land Use 1 has xeen Pre-Screened xy the Local /urisdiction: N&A 9ithout Project 9ith Project E Tier 1-3 VMT
Reductions
9ith Project E All VMT Reductions
Project Generated Vehicle Miles
Traveled (VMT) Rate
24J2 24J2 24J2
Lo% VMT Screening Analysis Yes (Pass) Yes (Pass) Yes (Pass) 35 30
('O 25 ......
·g- 20
(.) . .
. -.. 15 ., •••• t-
. . ~
> 10 . . . . . 5 . . 0
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 ••• 14.5,. 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • 24.2 . . . . . . . . . . VMT Metric Value Before Project 1
.
.
. ••••••••• .
.
.
.

VMT With Project and
Tier 1-3 VMT
Reductions
•••••••••
VMT With Project and
All VMT Reductions
- Land Use 1 Threshold VMT: 33.57 ••• Land Use 1 Max Reduction Possible: 14.5 ■ VMT Values

Page 835 of 858 ends

Appendix E
Tribal Consultation Supporting
Documentation

Page 836 of 858 ends

Page 837 of 858 ends

125 East College Street• Covina, CA 91 723-2 199
March 29, 2022
Andrew Salas, Chairperson
Gabrielino Band of Mission Indian-Kish Nation
P.O. Box 393
Covina, CA 91723
www.covinaca.gov
(626) 384-5400
Re: Formal Notification of City of Covina's Mixed-Use Overlay District Project Pursuant toAssembly Bill 52 Dear Mr. Andrew Salas:

The City of Covina (City) is contacting you in compliance with the California Assembly Bill (AB) 52 (including the California Public Resources Code Section 21080.3.1) because you are listed as the contact person in a tribal request for notice of proposed projects in this geographic area for which the City is the lead agency in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act.

The City proposes the addition of a new chapter of mixed-use overlay regulations to the City's Zoning Code, as well as amending the City's Official Zoning Map through the addition of a mixeduse overlay district (MUOD) to various sites located in 141 parcels within 13 Project Areas throughout the City (excluding the Covina Town Center Specific Plan) within the San Gabriel Valley of Los Angeles County (Figures 1 and 2). The purpose of the MUOD is to guide and regulate future mixed-use development under the policies and objectives of the Mixed-Use land use category as established in the City's General Plan. The total acreage for the parcels is approximately 74.83. The existing site conditions of the 13 Project Areas consist of developed lots generally comprising of commercial uses, asphalt surface parking lots, and ornamental landscaping and trees.

If you wish to initiate formal consultation under AB 52, the deadline to request consultation with the City is set by State law [California Public Resources Code Section 21080.3. I ( d)] and requires that you send a written request for consultation to the address below within 30 days of the receipt of this notice. Please send written responses for the proposed project to:

Nancy Fong, AICP
Community Development Consultant
City of Covina
125 E College Street
Covina, CA 91 723

Page 838 of 858 ends

If you do not wish to initiate formal consultation on this proposed project, no response to this notice is needed. If you do not wish to formally consult under AB 52 on this proposed project, you may participate in the California Environmental Quality Act process for this project on any issue of concern as an interested California Native American tribe, person, citizen, or member of the public.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 626-384-5463 or email address at [email protected].

Enclosures:

Figure 1: Regional Location Map
Figure 2: Local Vicinity Map

Page 839 of 858 ends

SOURCE: ESRI
r- ESA
City of Covina's Mixed-Use Overlay District Project
Figure 1
Regional Location Map

Page 840 of 858 ends

N Lark Ellen Ave
N Enid Ave
E Orkney St
E Queenside Dr N Vincent Ave
N Azusa Ave
Irwindale
Vincent
S California Ave
N Lark Ellen Ave
E Workman Ave
W Service Ave
E Service Ave
E Idahome St
W San Bernardino Rd
N Vincent Ave
N Su
nset Ave
W Puente Ave E Puente Ave
N Azusa Ave
E Badillo St
S Azusa Ave
W Badillo St
The Lakes
Plaza West
Covina
West Covina
High School
st Covina
E Cienega Ave
E Covina Blvd
W Edna Pl
E Ruddock St
E Benbow St
E Edna Pl
E Benwood St
E Front St
E Cypress St
E San Bernardino Rd
N Citrus Ave
W San Bernardino Rd
S Grand Ave N Grand Ave
E Ar
W Arrow Hwy row Hwy
Oakdale
Memorial Park
Kahler Russell
Park
Charter Oak
W Rowland St E Rowland St
E Italia St
E Ga rvey Ave N
E Workman AveS Barranca St
E Garve y Ave S
E Cortez St
S Hollenbeck St
E Virginia Ave
E Holt Ave
E Rio Verde Dr
W Center St
S 2nd Av
S Citrus A
e
ve
W Puente St E Puente St E Puente St S Citrus St S Grand Ave S
Grand
Ave
W Badillo St E Badillo St
San Bernardino Fwy
Eastland Center
The Row
Royal Oak
Middle School
Covina
E Covina Blvd
E Ruddock St
W Cypress Ave
Eaton Rd
E Juanita Ave
Bonnie Cove Ave N Bonnie Cove Ave
S Valley Center Ave
Claraday St
N Sunflower Ave
E Cypress St
E Arrow Hwy
E Badillo St
Charter Oak
High School
10 Avenida Loma Vis
E Holt Ave
E Covina Hills Rd
E Mesarica Rd
Calle Cristina
Puente Ave
E Puente St
San Bernardino Fwy
Forest Lawn
Memorial Park
Covina Hills
Via Verde
Country Club
Path: U:\GIS\GIS\Projects\2021xxx\D202100759_01_Covina_MUOD\03_MXDs_Projects\Project_Description.aprx, sgeissler 6/1/2022 SOURCE: Mapbox, 2021
0 2,000
Feet
City of Covina’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project
Figure 2
Local Vicinity Map
N
Proposed Mixed-Use Parcels
City of Covina
r- ESA
~

Page 841 of 858 ends

1 Fatima Clark
From: Brian Allee
Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2022 10:18 AM
To: Fatima Clark; Candace Ehringer
Subject: FW: Early Consultation per AB 52
Attachments: AB 52_ Covina MUOD_03-29-22 consultation request ltr.pdf Please see below for your records and for you to save in the folder. Thanks.

Brian J. Allee
Managing Associate
ESA | Environmental Science Associates
949.870.1536 direct
559.901.7985 mobile
From: Nancy Fong <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2022 10:11 AM
To: Brian Allee <[email protected]>
Subject: FW: Early Consultation per AB 52
Hi Brian,
FYI and for your record. I did not send the SB 18 letter of request because there is no general plan amendment. Thanks.

Nancy
From: Gabrieleno Administration <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, April 4, 2022 2:54 PM
To: Nancy Fong <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Early Consultation per AB 52
Hello Nancy
Thank you for your email. If there isn't going to be any ground disturbance taking place there will be no need for consultation. However we ask that you please notify us in the future if there will be ground disturbance occurring.

Thank you
Brandy Salas
Admin Specialist
Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians - Kizh Nation
PO Box 393
Covina, CA 91723
Office: 844-390-0787
website: www.gabrielenoindians.org

Page 842 of 858 ends

2 The region where Gabrieleño culture thrived for more than eight centuries encompassed most of Los Angeles County, more than half of Orange County and portions of Riverside and San Bernardino counties. It was the labor of the Gabrieleño who built the missions, ranchos and the pueblos of Los Angeles. They were trained in the trades, and they did the construction and maintenance, as well as the farming and managing of herds of livestock. “The Gabrieleño are the ones who did all this work, and they really are the foundation of the early economy of the Los Angeles area “ . “That’s a contribution that Los Angeles has not recognized--the fact that in its early decades, without the Gabrieleño, the community simply would not have survived.” On Mon, Apr 4, 2022 at 9:19 AM Nancy Fong <[email protected]> wrote:

Good morning,

There will not be any ground disturbances. However, Kizh Nation may provide comments indicating that any future physical development or redevelopment of the sites will require compliance with AB 52.

Nancy

From: Gabrieleno Administration <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2022 3:18 PM
To: Nancy Fong <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Early Consultation per AB 52

Hello Nancy

Thank you for your email. Will there be any type of Ground disturbances taking place?

Admin Specialist
Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians - Kizh Nation
PO Box 393
Covina, CA 91723
, !l OFAfzy
- >
,1 ~

Page 843 of 858 ends

3 Office: 844-390-0787
website: www.gabrielenoindians.org
The region where Gabrieleño culture thrived for more than eight centuries encompassed most of Los Angeles County, more than half of Orange County and portions of Riverside and San Bernardino counties. It was the labor of the Gabrieleño who built the missions, ranchos and the pueblos of Los Angeles. They were trained in the trades, and they did the construction and maintenance, as well as the farming and managing of herds of livestock. “The Gabrieleño are the ones who did all this work, and they really are the foundation of the early economy of the Los Angeles area “ . “That’s a contribution that Los Angeles has not recognized--the fact that in its early decades, without the Gabrieleño, the community simply would not have survived.”

On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 3:41 PM Nancy Fong <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi Andy,

Attached is a letter of request for early consultation for establishing a new Mixed-Use Overlay Regulations for the Zoning Code and Zone Changes for 141 parcels by adding the Mixed-Use Overlay District to the underlying Commercial or industrial zoned properties. The purpose of the proposed Mixed-Use Overlay regulations and related Zone Changes is to meet the Housing Element RHNA numbers. The 141 parcels we have selected to receive the proposed Mixed-Use Overlay Zone are all developed with buildings and parking areas except for one parcel. We are hoping for repurposing and redeveloping these parcels sometime in the future. There is absolutely no disturbances of the ground for these selected 141 parcels. If and when there is a future development project in those Mixed-Use Overlay zoned properties, additional early consultation will be required per AB 52.

Please let us know whether your tribe request a consultation and if so please provide us with your written comments. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 626-384-5463 or mobile at 909-856-0307. Thanks.

Sincerely,

Page 844 of 858 ends

4 Nancy

This email and any information and/or files transmitted /attached with it may contain confidential information that is exempt from disclosure under applicable law, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. No right to confidentiality is waived by this email transmission. If you are not the intended recipient, or responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, dissemination, distribution, or use of any of the information contained in or attached to this transmission is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please destroy the original transmission and its attachments without reading or saving them in any manner. Thank you.

Page 845 of 858 ends

-7-

EXHIBIT C
ZONE CHANGE (ZCH) 22-03

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

Page 846 of 858 ends

EXHIBIT C
ZONING CODE AMENDMENT 22-03

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING

PROGRAM

Page 847 of 858 ends

0 Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program
SECTION 4
Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program

1.1 CEQA Requirements
Table 4-1 is a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) for the City’s Mixed-Use Overlay District Project, which has been prepared pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15097 and Public Resources Code Section 21081.6. This MMRP lists all applicable mitigation measures from the IS/MND. The appropriate timing of implementation and responsible party are identified to ensure proper enforcement of the mitigation measures from the IS/MND to reduce Project impacts to less than significant levels. Mitigation measures are presented in the same order as they occur in the IS/MND.

The columns in the MMRP table provide the following information:
• Mitigation Measure(s): The action(s) that will be taken to reduce the impact to a less than significant level.
• Implementation Action: The action(s) listed out, according to the identified mitigation measure that would be implemented by the responsible agency. • Responsible Implementation Agency: The agency or private entity responsible for ensuring implementation of the mitigation measure. For the Project, the City of Covina, as the CEQA Lead Agency, remains responsible for ensuring that implementation of the mitigation measures occur in accordance with the MMRP (CEQA Guidelines Section 15097(a)). • Timing of Verification: The general timing for implementing each mitigation measure. • Verification Date: The date in which the mitigation measure has been completed.

The MMRP will be kept on file at the following address:

City of Covina, Community Development Department
125 E. College Avenue
Covina CA 91723

Page 848 of 858 ends

0 Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program
TABLE 4-1
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM FOR THE CITY OF COVINA’S MIXED-USE OVERLAY DISTRICT PROJECT Mitigation Measure Implementation Action
Responsible Implementation
Agency/Party
Timing of
Verification
Verification
Date
Air Quality
Mitigation Measure AIR-1: Construction Emissions. If, during subsequent project-level environmental review, construction-related criteria air pollutants are determined to have the potential to exceed the applicable South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) thresholds of significance, the City shall require applicants for future development and redevelopment associated with the Project to incorporate one or more of the following mitigation measures as necessary to reduce air pollutant emissions during construction activities to below the applicable SCAQMD thresholds of significance. Mitigation measures that may be identified during the environmental review include, but are not limited to:

1. Using construction equipment rated by the USEPA as having Tier 3 (model year 2006 or newer) or Tier 4 (model year 2008 or newer) emission limits, applicable for engines between 50 and 750 horsepower, as commercially available.

2. Using construction equipment that are equipped with a California Air Resources Board (CARB) verified Level 3 diesel particulate matter filter, applicable for engines between 50 and 750 horsepower, as commercially available.

3. Ensuring construction equipment is properly serviced and maintained to the manufacturer’s standards.

4. Limiting nonessential idling of construction equipment to less than five consecutive minutes at a location.

5. Water all active construction areas at least three times daily or four times daily if needed to control dust emissions. Watering should be sufficient to prevent airborne dust from leaving the site. Reclaimed water should be used whenever possible.

6. Increased watering frequency may be necessary whenever wind speeds exceed 15 miles per hour. Construction activities should be suspended during periods with wind speed gusts of 25 miles per hour or more.

7. Apply non-toxic chemical soil stabilizers, in lieu of watering, in sufficient quantities to control dust emissions and prevent visible dust from leaving the construction site.

8. Pave, apply water three times daily or as often as necessary to control dust, or apply non-toxic chemical soil stabilizers on all unpaved access roads, parking areas, and staging areas at construction sites.

The City shall require
applicants for future
development and
redevelopment associated
with the Project to
incorporate one or more of
the following mitigation
measures as necessary to
reduce air pollutant
emissions during
construction activities to
below the applicable
SCAQMD thresholds of
significance.

City of Covina During project-level
environmental review.

Page 849 of 858 ends

0 Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Implementation Action
Responsible Implementation
Agency/Party
Timing of
Verification
Verification
Date

9. Cover all trucks hauling soil, sand, and other loose materials or require all trucks to maintain at least two feet of freeboard (i.e., the minimum required space between the top of the load and the top of the trailer).

10. Sweep daily (with water sweepers using reclaimed water if possible), or as often as needed, all paved access roads, parking areas, and staging areas at the construction site to control dust.

11. Sweep public streets daily (with water sweepers using reclaimed water if possible) in the vicinity of the Project Sites, or as often as needed, to keep streets free of visible soil material.

12. Hydroseed or apply non-toxic soil stabilizers to inactive construction areas.

13. Enclose, cover, water three times daily, or apply non-toxic chemical soil binders to exposed stockpiles (dirt, sand, etc.).

AIR-2: Architectural Coating VOC Emissions. If, during subsequent project-level environmental review, it is determined that construction or operation of a project has the potential to exceed the applicable South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) thresholds of significance for volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from architectural coating activities, the City shall require the use of Super-Compliant VOC-content architectural coatings (10 grams per liter or less of VOCs) to be used during application of paints and other architectural coatings. If Super-Compliant VOC-content architectural coatings cannot be utilized, the developer shall reduce the quantity of paints and other architectural coatings applied in any one day as necessary to reduce VOC emissions from all project sources to below the SCAQMD thresholds of significance for VOCs (i.e., to below 75 pounds of VOC per day during construction activities and below 55 pounds of VOC per day during operational activities).

The City shall require the use
of Super-Compliant VOCcontent architectural coatings
(10 grams per liter or less of
VOCs) to be used during
application of paints and
other architectural coatings.

City of Covina During project-level
environmental review.

AIR-3: Energy Conservation. The City shall require energy conservation measures during future project-level environmental review, which may include the following:
• Install Energy Star rated heating, cooling, lighting, and appliances. • Use of Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) equipment with a Seasonal Energy Efficiency Ratio (SEER) of 12 or higher. • Installation of water heaters with an energy factor of 0.92 or higher. • Install solar water heaters or tank-less water heaters. • Use passive solar cooling/heating.
• Use cool roofs and surfaces for residential and non-residential buildings. • Encourage strategic tree planting and shading to reduce building energy demand for cooling.

The City shall require energy
conservation measures
during future project-level
environmental review.

City of Covina During project-level
environmental review.

Page 850 of 858 ends

0 Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Implementation Action
Responsible Implementation
Agency/Party
Timing of
Verification
Verification
Date
• Encourage the use of electric building energy systems in place of building natural gas systems.

AIR-4: Transportation Efficiency. The City shall require transportation efficiency measures during future project-level environmental review, which may include the following:
• Implement transportation demand management (TDM) strategies to reduce VMT from project operations.
• Provide residents and employees of projects with information regarding public transportation options.
• Provide residents and employees of projects with bicycle parking facilities that meet or exceed municipal code requirements. • Provide residents and employees of projects with electric vehicle supply equipment that meet or exceed municipal code requirements.

The City shall require
transportation efficiency
measures during future
project-level environmental
review.

City of Covina During project-level
environmental review.

AIR-5: Stationary Sources. Applicants for new or modified stationary sources associated with the Project that: 1) have the potential to generate 40 or more diesel trucks per day and 2) are located within 1,000 feet of a sensitive land use (e.g. residential, schools, hospitals, nursing homes), as measured from the property line of the Project to the property line of the nearest sensitive use, shall submit a health risk assessment (HRA) to the County Department of Regional Planning prior to future discretionary project approval. The HRA shall be prepared in accordance with policies and procedures of the state Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) and the applicable air quality management district. If the HRA shows that the incremental cancer risk exceeds ten in one million (10E-06), particulate matter concentrations would exceed 2.5 μg/m3, or the appropriate noncancer hazard index exceeds 1.0, the applicant will be required to identify and demonstrate that best available control technologies for toxics (T BACTs) are capable of reducing potential cancer and noncancer risks to an acceptable level, including appropriate enforcement mechanisms.

T-BACTs may include, but are not limited to, restricting idling onsite or electrifying warehousing docks to reduce diesel particulate matter, or requiring use of newer equipment and/or vehicles. T-BACTs identified in the HRA shall be identified as mitigation measures in the environmental document and/or incorporated into the site development plan as a component of the Project.

Submit a health risk
assessment (HRA) to the
County Department of
Regional Planning prior to
future discretionary project
approval.

City of Covina
County Department of
Regional Planning
During project-level
environmental review.

Prior to future
discretionary project
approval.

AIR 6: Health Risk Assessment. Applicants shall submit a HRA to the County prior to future discretionary project approval for sensitive land uses associated with the Project within the following distances as measured from the property line of the Project to the property line of the source/edge of the nearest travel lane, from these facilities:
• Industrial facilities within 1,000 feet.

Applicants shall submit a
HRA to the County prior to
future discretionary project
approval for sensitive land
uses associated with the
Project.

City of Covina During project-level
environmental review.

Prior to future
discretionary project
approval.

Page 851 of 858 ends

0 Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Implementation Action
Responsible Implementation
Agency/Party
Timing of
Verification
Verification
Date
• Distribution centers (40 or more trucks per day) within 1,000 feet. • Major transportation projects (50,000 or more vehicles per day) within 1,000 feet.
• Gasoline dispensing facilities within 300 feet.
• The HRA shall be prepared in accordance with policies and procedures of the applicable Air Quality Management District. If the HRA shows that the incremental cancer risk exceeds ten in one million (10E-06) or the appropriate noncancer hazard index exceeds 1.0, the applicant will be required to identify and demonstrate that mitigation measures are capable of reducing potential cancer and non-cancer risks to an acceptable level (i.e., below ten in one million or a hazard index of 1.0), including appropriate enforcement mechanisms. Measures to reduce risk may include but are not limited to:
• Air intakes located away from high volume roadways and/or truck loading zones, unless it can be demonstrated to the County Department of Regional Planning that there are operational limitations. • Heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems of the buildings provided with appropriately sized maximum efficiency rating value (MERV) filters.

Biological Resources
Mitigation Measure BIO-1: Nesting Birds. Vegetation removal shall be conducted between September 1 and January 31, outside the typical nesting season for birds in the region. If vegetation removal must occur during the typical nesting season (February 1 – August 31), a qualified biologist shall conduct a pre-construction survey for active nests within areas that will be subject to vegetation removal, construction noise, and/or ground disturbances, including a 100 to 300-foot buffer around existing trees and landscaped areas, to identify any potential active nests. Buffer distances should be adjusted at the discretion of the biologist based on the location of the nest, species, and surrounding land uses. If no sign of nesting activity is observed, construction may proceed without potential impacts to nesting birds.

If an active nest is observed during the pre-construction clearance survey, an adequate buffer determined by the qualified biologist shall be established around the active nest depending on sensitivity of the species and proximity to construction activity and impact areas. Onsite construction monitoring may also be required to ensure that no direct or indirect impacts occur to the active nest or nesting activities. Construction activities shall be avoided within the buffer, unless otherwise approved by the monitoring biologist (e.g., vehicles could pass through buffer areas while jackhammering would be restricted). Buffers shall be clearly marked and defined to restrict certain Conduct all vegetation
removal between September
1 and January 31, outside
the typical nesting season for
birds in the region.

If vegetation removal must
occur during the typical
nesting season (February 1 –
August 31), a qualified
biologist shall conduct a preconstruction survey for active nests within areas that will be
subject to vegetation
removal, construction noise,
and/or ground disturbances,
including a 100 to 300-foot
buffer around existing trees
and landscaped areas, to
identify any potential active
nests.

City of Covina
Qualified Project Biologist
Project Contractor
Prior to and during
grading and/or
construction.

Page 852 of 858 ends

0 Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Implementation Action
Responsible Implementation
Agency/Party
Timing of
Verification
Verification
Date
activities where they could result in nest failure, and shall remain in place until nests are no longer active, as determined by the monitoring biologist.

Cultural Resources
Mitigation Measure CUL-1: Prior to the issuance of ground disturbing activities of future development and redevelopment associated with the Project, the City shall retain a qualified archaeologist, defined as meeting the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards for archaeology, to conduct an archaeological resources assessment including:
a records search at the South Central Coastal Information Center; a Sacred Lands File search at the Native American Heritage Commission; a pedestrian field survey, where deemed appropriate by the qualified archaeologist; recordation of all identified archaeological resources on California Department of Parks and Recreation 523 forms; a subsurface archaeological sensitivity assessment; and preparation of a technical report documenting the methods and results of the study. If an archaeological resource is identified as a result of the survey, the qualified archaeologist will prepare and conduct a testing program to delineate the resource’s boundaries and identify presence/absence of subsurface deposits. The results of the testing will be included in the technical report. If an archaeological resource cannot be avoided, it shall be evaluated for significance. The qualified archaeologist shall also provide recommendations regarding archaeological and Native American monitoring, protection of avoided resources and/or recommendations for additional work or treatment of significant resources that will be affected by the Project. When assessing significance and developing treatment for resources that are Native American in origin, the City shall consult with local Native American Tribes.

Prior to the issuance of
ground disturbing activities of
future development and
redevelopment associated
with the Project, the City shall
retain a qualified
archaeologist.

If an archaeological resource
is identified as a result of the
survey, the qualified
archaeologist will prepare
and conduct a testing
program to delineate the
resource’s boundaries and
identify presence/absence of
subsurface deposits.

City of Covina
Qualified Archaeologist
Project Contractor
Prior to the issuance
of ground disturbing
activities.

Prior to
commencement of
excavation activities.

Mitigation Measure CUL-2: Prior to the issuance of ground disturbing activities of future development and redevelopment associated with the Project on parcels that contain or are adjacent to buildings or structures more than 45 years old, the City shall retain a qualified architectural historian, defined as meeting the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards for architectural history, to conduct a historic resources assessment including: a records search at the South Central Coastal Information Center; a review of pertinent archives and sources; a pedestrian field survey; recordation of all identified historic architectural Prior to the issuance of
ground disturbing activities of
future development and
redevelopment associated
with the Project on parcels
that contain or are adjacent
to buildings or structures
more than 45 years old, the
City of Covina
Qualified Architectural
Historian
Project Contractor
Prior to and during
grading and/or
construction.

Page 853 of 858 ends

0 Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Implementation Action
Responsible Implementation
Agency/Party
Timing of
Verification
Verification
Date
resources on California Department of Parks and Recreation 523 forms; evaluation of resources for listing in the California Register and for local listing; and preparation of a technical report documenting the methods and results of the assessment. All identified historical resources will be assessed for the Project’s potential to result in direct and/or indirect effects to those resources. The qualified architectural historian shall provide recommendations regarding additional work or treatment for historical resources that will be affected by the Project prior to their demolition or alteration. This could include but is not limited to compliance with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties, Historic American Buildings Survey (HABS) recordation, incorporation of interpretive elements into new construction, or commemoration.

In addition, the qualified architectural historian shall review project plans for future development and redevelopment associated with the Project adjacent to historical resources to ensure there will be no indirect effects.

City shall retain a qualified
architectural historian.

The qualified architectural
historian shall provide
recommendations regarding
additional work or treatment
for historical resources that
will be affected by the Project
prior to their demolition or
alteration.

Mitigation Measure CUL-3: If human remains are encountered, then the City or its contractor shall immediately halt work in the vicinity (within 50 feet) of the discovery and contact the Los Angeles County Coroner in accordance with Public Resources Code Section 5097.98 and Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, which requires that no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to the remains’ origin and disposition pursuant. If the County Coroner determines the remains are Native American, then the Coroner will notify the NAHC within 24 hours in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5(c), and Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. The NAHC shall then identify the person(s) thought to be the MLD. The MLD may, with the permission of the land owner, or their authorized representative, inspect the site of the discovery of the Native American remains and may recommend to the owner or the person responsible for the excavation work means for treating or disposing, with appropriate dignity, the human remains and any associated grave goods. The MLD shall complete their inspection and make their recommendation within 48 hours of being granted access by the landowner to inspect the discovery. The recommendation may include the scientific removal and nondestructive analysis of human remains and items associated with Native American burials. The City and the landowner shall discuss and confer with the MLD on all reasonable options regarding the MLD’s preferences for treatment.

Until the City and the landowner have conferred with the MLD, the contractor shall ensure that the immediate vicinity where the discovery occurred is not disturbed by further activity and is adequately protected according to generally accepted cultural or archaeological standards or practices, and that further activities take into account the possibility of multiple burials.

If human remains are
encountered, the contractor
should halt work in the
vicinity (within 100 feet) of
the find and contact the Los
Angeles County Coroner in
accordance with PRC
Section 5097.98 and Health
and Safety Code Section
7050.5. If the County
Coroner determines that the
remains are Native
American, the California
Native American Heritage
Commission (NAHC) will be
notified in accordance with
Health and Safety Code
Section 7050.5, subdivision
(c), and PRC Section
5097.98 (as amended by
Assembly Bill 2641). The
NAHC will designate a Most
Likely Descendent (MLD) for
the remains per PRC Section
5097.98.

City of Covina
Qualified Archaeologist
Project Contractor
Prior to and during
grading and/or
construction.

Page 854 of 858 ends

0 Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Implementation Action
Responsible Implementation
Agency/Party
Timing of
Verification
Verification
Date
If the NAHC is unable to identify an MLD, or the MLD identified fails to make a recommendation, or the landowner rejects the recommendation of the MLD and the mediation provided for in Section 5097.94(k), if invoked, fails to provide measures acceptable to the landowner, the landowner or his or her authorized representative shall inter the human remains and items associated with Native American human remains with appropriate dignity on the property in a location not subject to further and future subsurface disturbance.

Geology and Soils
Mitigation Measure GEO-1: Prior to construction of future development and redevelopment associated with the Project that involve ground disturbance below 10 feet in Pleistocene alluvium or marine Puente Formation sediments, the City shall retain a qualified paleontologist who meets the (SVP) Standards (SVP, 2010) to develop and oversee construction worker paleontological resources sensitivity training program and paleontological monitoring. All initial ground disturbance below 10 feet deep shall be monitored full-time by a qualified paleontological monitor (SVP 2010) working under the direct supervision of the qualified paleontologist.

Monitoring may be reduced to periodic spot checks or ceased entirely at the discretion of the qualified paleontologist, based on subsurface observations and the likelihood of encountering fossiliferous sediments. The qualified paleontologist shall also consider whether screen washing sediments is necessary to recover smaller specimens. All recovered fossils shall be prepared for identification to the lowest taxonomic level possible, cataloged, and curated at an accredited facility with retrievable storage. The qualified paleontologist shall prepare a final report to be submitted to the City and filed with the curation facility and Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County.

Prior to construction of future
development and
redevelopment associated
with the Project that involve
ground disturbance below 10
feet in Pleistocene alluvium
or marine Puente Formation
sediments, the City shall
retain a qualified
paleontologist.

All initial ground disturbance
below 10 feet deep shall be
monitored full-time by a
qualified paleontological
monitor (SVP 2010) working
under the direct supervision
of the qualified
paleontologist.

All recovered fossils shall be
prepared for identification to
the lowest taxonomic level
possible, cataloged, and
curated at an accredited
facility with retrievable
storage.

The qualified paleontologist
shall prepare a final report to
be submitted to the City and
filed with the curation facility
and Natural History Museum
of Los Angeles County.

City of Covina
Qualified Paleontologist
Project Contractor
Prior to and during
grading and/or
construction.

Page 855 of 858 ends

0 Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Implementation Action
Responsible Implementation
Agency/Party
Timing of
Verification
Verification
Date
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Mitigation Measure GHG-1: Water Conservation. The City shall require water conservation measures during future project-level environmental review, which may include the following:
• Utilize the model energy efficiency code to encourage drought-tolerant landscaping and the use of water-efficient irrigation systems. • Use drought-tolerant, low water, and/or native vegetation for landscaping.
• Use water efficient irrigation systems.

The City shall require water
conservation measures
during future project-level
environmental review.

City of Covina Project-level
environmental review.

Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Mitigation Measure HAZ-1: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment:

Prior to the initiation of any construction requiring ground-disturbing activities on industrial and commercial properties, as well as listed active hazardous materials cleanup sites, Project Applicants shall complete a Phase I environmental site assessment for that property in accordance with American Society for Testing and Materials Standard E1527 for those active hazardous materials sites to ascertain their current status. Any recommended follow up sampling (i.e., Phase II activities) set forth in the Phase I assessment shall be implemented prior to construction. The results of Phase II studies, if necessary, shall be submitted to the local overseeing agency and any required remediation or further delineation of identified contamination shall be completed prior to commencement of construction.

Project Applicants shall
complete a Phase I
environmental site
assessment for that property
in accordance with American
Society for Testing and
Materials Standard E1527 for
those active hazardous
materials sites to ascertain
their current status.

City of Covina Prior to the initiation
of any construction
requiring grounddisturbing activities,
as well as listed
active hazardous
materials cleanup
sites.

Mitigation Measure HAZ-2: Health and Safety Plan: For those properties for which the Phase I assessment identifies hazardous materials issues, before the start of ground-disturbing activities, including grading, trenching, or excavation, or structure demolition, the Project Applicants for the specific work proposed shall require that the construction contractor(s) retain a qualified professional to prepare a site-specific health and safety plan (HASP) in accordance with federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration regulations (29 CFR 1910.120) and California Occupational Safety and Health Administration regulations (8 CCR Section 5192).

The HASP shall be implemented by the construction contractor to protect construction workers, the public, and the environment during all grounddisturbing and structure demolition activities. The HASP shall include designation of a site health and safety officer, a summary of the anticipated risks, a description of personal protective equipment and decontamination procedures, and procedures to follow if evidence of potential soil or groundwater contamination is encountered.

Project Applicants for the
specific work proposed shall
require that the construction
contractor(s) retain a
qualified professional to
prepare a site-specific health
and safety plan (HASP).

City of Covina
Project Contractor
Qualified Professional to
prepare HASP
Before the start of
ground-disturbing
activities, including
grading, trenching, or
excavation, or
structure demolition.

Mitigation Measure HAZ-3: Soil and Groundwater Management Plan: In support of the HASP described in Mitigation Measure HAZ-2, the Project The Project Applicants shall
require that its contractor(s)
City of Covina Before the start of
ground-disturbing

Page 856 of 858 ends

0 Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Implementation Action
Responsible Implementation
Agency/Party
Timing of
Verification
Verification
Date
Applicants shall require that its contractor(s) develop and implement a Soil and Groundwater Management Plan (SGMP) for the management of soil and groundwater before any ground-disturbing activity. The SGMP shall describe the hazardous materials that may be encountered, the roles and responsibilities of on-site workers and supervisors, training for site workers focused on the recognition of and response to encountering hazardous materials, and protocols for the materials (soil and/or dewatering effluent) testing, handling, removing, transporting, and disposing of all excavated materials and dewatering effluent in a safe, appropriate, and lawful manner. develop and implement a Soil
and Groundwater
Management Plan (SGMP).

Project Contractor activities, including
grading, trenching, or
excavation, or
structure demolition.

Noise
Mitigation Measure NOI-1: Construction Hours. Construction activities occurring as part of the future development and redevelopment associated with the Project shall be subject to the limitations which states that construction activities may occur between 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. Mondays through Saturdays. No construction activities shall be permitted outside of these hours or on Sundays and federal holidays unless a temporary waiver is granted by the City.

Construction activities shall
be subject to the limitations
which states that construction
activities may occur between
7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m.

Mondays through Saturdays.

City of Covina
Project Contractor
During construction.

Mitigation Measure NOI-2: Construction Best Management Practices.

Prior to issuance of grading permits for future development and redevelopment associated with the Project, the Project Applicants shall incorporate the following measures as a note on the grading plan cover sheet to ensure that the greatest distance between noise sources and sensitive receptors during construction activities have been achieved. • Construction equipment, fixed or mobile, shall be equipped with properly operating and maintained noise mufflers consistent with manufacturers’ standards.
• Construction staging areas shall be located away from off-site sensitive uses during construction of the Project.
• The Project Contractors shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the Project Sites, whenever feasible.

The Project Applicants shall
incorporate measures as a
note on the grading plan
cover sheet to ensure that
the greatest distance
between noise sources and
sensitive receptors during
construction activities have
been achieved.

City of Covina
Project Applicants
Prior to issuance of
grading permits.

Mitigation Measure NOI-3: Building Design Noise Control Measures.

Design standards for proposed new multifamily residential uses within the Project Sites may include but are not limited to:
• Dwelling units that would be exposed to traffic noise levels exceeding 57 dBA CNEL: A form of fresh air supply, such as air conditioning systems, will be required.
• Dwelling units that would be exposed to traffic noise levels exceeding 65 dBA CNEL: Outdoor living areas such as balcony or deck on the side of the buildings exposed to high traffic noise should not be allowed unless noise mitigation measures, such as barrier walls with a minimum height Building design noise control
measures.

City of Covina
Project Contractor
During project-level
environmental review.

Prior to construction.

Page 857 of 858 ends

0 Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Implementation Action
Responsible Implementation
Agency/Party
Timing of
Verification
Verification
Date
of 5 feet with adequate materials (CMU, wood, Plexiglas) with no holes or gaps, along the perimeter of the outdoor living areas are included. • Dwelling units that would be exposed to traffic noise levels exceeding 69 dBA CNEL: Windows associated with bedrooms and living/family rooms on the side of the buildings exposed to high traffic noise will be required to have building façade upgrades, such as using windows with Sound Transmission Class (STC) ratings higher than standard building practice (up to STC-28).

Mitigation Measure NOI-4: Stationary Sources Noise Control Measures. Due to the nature of mixed use overlay, some residences may be exposed to noise sources from the operations of the commercial uses nearby or down below. Such noise sources include loading/unloading activity and outdoor mechanical equipment and the following design standards are recommended.
• Loading areas associated with commercial uses within the Project Sites should be placed away from outdoor living areas associated with residential uses. Noise barriers with sufficient height to block the line-ofsight between the loading areas and outdoor living areas in proximity of the loading areas will be required.
• Stationary outdoor mechanical equipment should be placed away from residential outdoor living areas or be enclosed with a structure to minimize the potential noise impacts.
• All noise sources shall follow the City’s Municipal Code noise control ordinance requirements.

Stationary sources noise
control measures
City of Covina
Project Contractor
During project-level
environmental review.

Prior to construction.

Page 858 of 858 ends

CC Regular Meeting

AGENDA ITEM REPORT
ITEM NO. CC 12
Meeting: CC Regular Meeting - Nov 15 2022
Title: Memorandum of Understanding Between the City and Charter Oak Unified School District Related to the Improvement and Joint Use of School Site Athletic Field Facilities Presented By: Chris Marcarello, City Manager
Brian Lee, Director of Community Development
Lisa Evans, Director of Parks, Recreation and Library Services Andy Bullington, Director of Public Works
Recommendation: That the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute a Memorandum of Understanding with Charter Oak Unified School District.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

Over the last several months, staff from the City of Covina (“City”) and Charter Oak Unified School District (“District”) have held exploratory conversations related to the future enhancement and joint use of District athletic fields/facilities. As proposed, a City/District partnership could provide significant community benefit, including enhancing fields for student use, utilizing drought-tolerant landscape and irrigation systems to reduce water consumption and expanding the public’s use of renovated fields during school off-hours.

The proposed Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) seeks to continue this cooperative effort – whereby the City would provide in-kind staff resources to participate with the District in designing field improvements and share costs for the preparation and submittal of grant applications to fund renovation work. Additionally, the City/District would work to update its existing joint use agreements so that renovated facilities would be accessible to the general public and youth sports organizations during school off-hours, including weekday evenings, weekends and other times when school is not in session. It is envisioned that funding sources for field/facilities improvements could include regional water conservation grants, local water conservation funds and Federal/State/Regional parks grant programs.

BACKGROUND:

As proposed, the City and District’s collaborative approach to the modernization of athletic fields/facilities would occur as follows:
• Selection of Locations – The District shall identify locations that could be viable for renovation work.

City/District shall work cooperatively to develop a priority list of project locations based on existing conditions, field sizes, existing activities/field usage, potential future field usage and water savings, among others.
• Design Work/Grant Applications – The City has a unique understanding of available grant programs that pertain to park improvements, water conservation and storm water retention. As such, the City would work to identify available grant programs that may be appropriate for project locations. The City/District would then work cooperatively and share costs to develop designs and grant applications for the renovation of District athletic fields – with the City paying costs up front and the District reimbursing 50% of costs. Grant applications shall be submitted with District as lead agency and City as co-sponsor. • Grant Administration, Project Bidding/Administration/Management – Since locations are owned by the District, most project-related activities are subject to State and/or County of Los Angeles Office of Education bidding/construction requirements, it is prudent for the District to take the lead in managing related activities and serving as lead agency for grant awards. As the need arises, the City may provide support related to bid analysis, value engineering, and construction management activities in support of projects.
• Ongoing Operations – The City/District shall work cooperatively to update existing joint use agreements for the long-term management and operation of athletic fields/facilities.

To begin this collaborative effort, the City and District have identified the Royal Oak Middle School athletic fields as a priority location for modernization efforts. Should the MOU be approved by the City/District, it is the intent of both parties to begin design plans and pursue grant applications for this location. Both parties will continue to work on additional locations, as they are identified by the District.

FISCAL IMPACT:

As proposed, the City and District would provide in-kind resources and share costs related to the preparation of grant applications and the design of enhancements at District fields/facilities. The City’s share of related to costs will be derived from existing local and regional water conservation funds that are available to replace nonrecreational turf with drought-tolerant landscaping and irrigation systems.

CEQA (CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT):

Each project would be evaluated on a case-by-case basis to determine potential environmental impacts.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment A - MOU with Charter Oak Unified School District for Grant Application and Administration Respectfully submitted,

Page 2 of 6 ends

A-1
12923-0001\2736699v2.doc

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF

COVINA AND CHARTER OAK UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT FOR THE

JOINT APPLICATION OF GRANT FUNDING FOR IMPROVEMENTS OF

SCHOOL FACILITIES AT ROYAL OAK MIDDLE SCHOOL
THIS MOU is made and entered into as of November 16, 2022 and between the City of Covina, a municipal corporation (“City”), and the Charter Oak Unified School District (“District”).

In consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties do hereby agree as follows:

1. Recitals. This MOU is entered into with respect to the following facts and for the following purposes, each of which is acknowledged as true and correct by the parties:
a. It is the desire of the City and the District to memorialize the protocol for joint application and administration of grant applications for the improvement and maintenance of existing athletic fields at Royal Oak Middle School and other District properties (“School Facilities”) and the joint use and maintenance of School Facilities, where practicable. b. As part of the joint effort, it is the intent of the parties to jointly and cooperatively prepare and submit grant applications for funding to install synthetic turf surfaces in the athletic fields and drought tolerant landscaping in passive spaces surrounding the athletic fields at Royal Oak Middle School (the “Project”) to promote the City’s and District’s efforts to conserve water and to enable both the District and the City to jointly use the School Facilities for the benefit of both District students and City residents.
c. The parties also desire to share in the costs of preparing the grant applications for the Project.
d. The parties also intend to prepare a separate joint use agreement to set forth the parameters for the City’s use of District’s School Facilities and other District-owned recreational, athletic and other school facilities when school is not in session during Winter Break, Summer Break and non-school hours, including evenings on Monday through Friday and all-day Saturday and Sunday.

2. Term of Agreement. The term of this MOU shall commence on the date of this MOU and shall terminate on November 15, 2027, unless sooner terminated pursuant to this MOU.

3. Responsibilities.
a. Shared Costs. The parties agree to equally split (50/50) the costs of:
(1) Preparation, legal review and consultant costs relating to any joint grant applications for the Project;
(2) Design of the Project;

Page 3 of 6 ends

A-2
12923-0001\2736699v2.doc
(3) Preparation of Project construction documents (i.e., plans, specifications, and estimates);
(4) Project contract administration;
(5) Project construction management for the term of this MOU; and (6) Any necessary and related special studies and related due diligence work, legal review, engineering work, design work, and other consultant work required for the Project.
b. Parties shall meet/confer and provide written authorization to issue a noticeto-proceed prior to the execution of any agreement for grant preparation, project design or related services.
c. The City shall establish an account to fund the preparation of grant applications (with conceptual design illustrations and special studies and related due diligence as necessary) and related legal review, engineering work, design work, and other necessary consultant work (collectively “Grant Application Work”). The City shall invoice the School District for shared project expenses.
d. The City shall invoice the District on a monthly basis, and the District shall reimburse the City fifty percent (50%) of all costs incurred by the City on a monthly basis in connection with the Grant Application Work.
e. On behalf of the parties, the City shall administer the preparation and submission of joint applications for grant funding to pay for or off-set the costs of the Project; f. Once grant funding is obtained, the parties shall use said grant funding to construct and install the Project at Royal Oak Middle School to promote the City’s and District’s efforts to conserve water. District shall serve as lead agency for any successful grant awards, with City participating as a project co-sponsor.
g. District shall administer the Project competitive bid process for construction and installation of the Project, award the Project contract, and manage the contractor to complete the Project.
h. District and City shall work cooperatively to maintain the Project in good working condition after the Project is completed.
i. In exchange for the City’s staff time, investment of City funds and overall participation in the Project and the related grant application preparation process, District agrees to allow the City joint use of the School Facilities pursuant to the terms of the forthcoming Joint Use Agreement for use of the School Facilities.
j. As part of the Joint Use Agreement, City and District agree to further analyze the provision of long-term maintenance activities and costs at School Facilities, including the potential development of a cost-sharing mechanism for each parties proportionate use.

Page 4 of 6 ends

A-3
12923-0001\2736699v2.doc

4. Termination Clause. This Agreement may be terminated at any time, with or without cause, by either of the Parties upon thirty (30) days written notice to the other party as provided in this Agreement.

5. Agreement Contingent on Governing Board/Council Approval. The City nor District shall not be bound by the terms of this MOU or any joint grant application for School Improvements until this MOU and any joint application has been formally approved or ratified by, respectively, the City Council and the District's Board.

6. Notices to Parties. Written notices, demands and communications among the District and City, shall be sufficiently given by personal service or dispatched by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, to the principal offices of the District or City as follows:

District: Charter Oak Unified School District
20240 E. Cienega Avenue
Covina, CA 91724
Attention: Superintendent
City: City of Covina
125 E. College Street
Covina, California 91723
Attention: City Manager
Such written notices, demands and communications may be sent in the same manner to such other addresses as either party may from time to time designate by mail as provided in this Section.

7. Assignment. Neither Party shall assign or transfer this MOU or any portion thereof without the prior written consent of the other party.

8. Severability. Any provision of this MOU which proves to be invalid, void, or illegal, shall in no way affect, impair or invalidate any other provision, and such other provisions shall remain in full force and effect.

9. Counterparts. This MOU and all amendments and supplements to it may be executed in counterparts, and all counterparts together shall be construed as one document, and all such executed counterparts shall constitute the same MOU, and the signature of any party to any counterpart shall be deemed a signature to, and may be appended to, any other counterpart.

10. Annual Review. The parties agree to any annual review of this MOU, commencing in December 2023.

11. Entire Agreement and Amendments. This MOU and all exhibits referred to in this MOU constitute the final, complete and exclusive statement of the terms of the agreement between the Parties pertaining to the subject matter of this MOU and supersede all other prior or

Page 5 of 6 ends

A-4
12923-0001\2736699v2.doc
contemporaneous oral or written understandings and agreements of the Parties. This MOU may not be amended, nor any provision or breach hereof waived, except in a writing signed by representatives of both Parties.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF this MOU has been executed by the authorized representatives of the parties hereto.

CITY OF COVINA CHARTER OAK UNIFIED SCHOOL

DISTRICT
Attest:
______________, City Clerk
Attest:

Secretary to the School Board

Page 6 of 6 ends

Covina City CouncilNovember 15, 2022

Covina City Council
November 15, 2022