Agenda packet — Covina City Council, June 18, 2024 (part 6 of 17)

_____________________________________________________________________________________________ City of Covina Avid Hotel Project
July 2023 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
92 that the proposed outdoor seating area would be separated from the multifamily residence by proposed surface parking, a new driveway, and the existing vacant (landscaped) land to the east.

As such, noise generated from Project construction would be further screened and attenuated.

Impacts would be less than significant in this regard.

Mitigation Measure NOI-1: To reduce noise impacts due to construction activities, the Project applicant shall demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the City of Covina Community Development Director, that the Project complies with the following:
· Prior to approval of grading plans and/or issuance of building permits, Project plans and specifications shall include a note indicating that noise‐generating construction activities shall only occur between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m.

Monday through Saturday, with no activity allowed on Sundays or public holidays, per Covina Noise Ordinance Section 9.40.110. The construction supervisor shall ensure compliance with the Project plans and specifications, and the City of Covina shall conduct periodic inspections, at its discretion.
· Prior to initiation of construction, the contractor shall demonstrate to the City of Covina Community Development Director that equipment is properly muffled, shielded and maintained. During all Project construction, the construction contractor shall ensure that power construction equipment (including combustion or electric engines), fixed or mobile, shall be equipped with noise shielding and muffling devices (consistent with manufacturers’ standards) during the entirety of construction of the proposed Project. The combination of muffling devices and noise shielding shall be capable of reducing noise by at least 5 dBA from nonmuffled and shielded noise levels. All equipment shall be properly maintained to ensure that no additional noise, due to worn or improperly maintained parts, would be generated.
· The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that would create the greatest distance between construction‐related noise sources and noise‐sensitive receivers nearest to the Project Site during all construction activities.
b. Would the project result in generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels?
Less Than Significant. Project construction can generate varying degrees of groundborne vibration, depending on the construction procedure and the construction equipment used.

Operation of some heavy-duty construction equipment generates vibrations that spread through the ground and diminish in amplitude with distance from the source. The effect on buildings in the vicinity of the construction site often varies depending on soil type, ground strata, and construction characteristics of the receiver building(s). The results from vibration can range from no perceptible effects at the lowest vibration levels, to low rumbling sounds and perceptible vibration at moderate levels, to slight damage at the highest levels. Groundborne vibrations from construction activities rarely reach levels that significantly damage structures.

The types of construction vibration impact include human annoyance and building damage.

Human annoyance occurs when construction vibration rises significantly above the threshold of human perception for extended periods of time. Building damage can be cosmetic or structural.

Project construction would involve the use of typical construction equipment and would not involve

Page 786 of 2700 ends

_____________________________________________________________________________________________ City of Covina Avid Hotel Project
July 2023 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
93 heavy-duty equipment capable of generating excessive vibration impact. Construction for the Project (approximately 11 months) would be short term and vibration-generating equipment would not stay in one place. As such, this analysis focuses on building damage.

Typical vibration produced by construction equipment is illustrated in Table XIII-5, Typical Vibration Levels for Construction Equipment.

Table XIII-5
Typical Vibration Levels for Construction Equipment
Equipment
Reference Approximate Peak
Particle Velocity at 25 Feet
(inch/second)
Approximate Peak Particle
Velocity at 180 Feet
(inch/second)1
Large bulldozer 0.089 0.0046
Loaded trucks 0.076 0.0039
Jackhammer 0.035 0.0018
Small bulldozer 0.003 0.0002
Notes:

1. The nearest sensitive receptor (i.e., multifamily residence to the east) is located approximately 180 feet from the Project boundary.

Calculated using the following formula:

PPV equip = PPVref x (25/D)1.5
where: PPV (equip) = the peak particle velocity in inch-per-second of the equipment adjusted for the distance; PPV (ref) = the reference vibration level in inch-per-second from Table 7-4 of the FTA Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual; D = the distance from the equipment to the receiver.

Source: Federal Transit Administration, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual, September 2018. Table 7-4 Vibration Source Levels for Construction Equipment.

The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) has published standard vibration velocities for construction equipment operations. For non-engineered timber and masonry buildings (i.e., most residential structures), the FTA architectural damage criterion for continuous vibrations is 0.2 inch‐ per‐second. The nearest sensitive receptor would be the multifamily residence located approximately 180 feet from proposed construction areas. As shown in Table XIII-5, vibration velocities from heavy construction equipment operations typically used during construction range from 0.0002 to 0.0046 inch‐per‐second PPV at 180 feet. Therefore, vibration from construction equipment vibration would not exceed the FTA architectural damage criterion for residential buildings and building damage would not occur at the nearest sensitive receptor. Impacts would be less than significant.
c. For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project exposure of people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?
No Impact. The nearest public use airport to the Project Site is the Brackett Field Airport, located approximately 6.5 miles east. Additionally, the Project Site is not in the vicinity of a private airstrip.

Therefore, no impact would occur.

Page 787 of 2700 ends

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
a. Induce substantial unplanned population
growth in an area, either directly (for
example, by proposing new homes and
businesses) or indirectly (for example,
through extension of roads or other
infrastructure)?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
b. Displace substantial numbers of existing
people or housing, necessitating the
construction of replacement housing
elsewhere?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
Explanation of Checklist Responses
a. Would the project induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? Less Than Significant Impact. The Project includes the development of a 68-room hotel with the employment of 15 hotel staff. As discussed in Checklist Section XI, Land Use and Planning, of this IS/MND, the proposed hotel uses would be consistent with the permitted land uses on-site.

No housing units would be developed as part of the Project, and no new or expanded urban infrastructure would be constructed that could foster increased development intensity on-site or at surrounding properties. Similar to other construction projects in the region, the Project construction workers are expected to be drawn from the large, available regional labor force, who would commute to the Project Site during the estimated 11-month construction period. As such, the Project would not induce construction employees to move to the Project vicinity. During operation, the Project would provide short-term stays for guests and would not provide long-term residences. Under existing conditions, the Project Site is occupied by a 6,221-square-foot building and a 485-square-foot building with commercial uses, which are estimated to employ approximately 33 employees.62 The Project would require 15 employees, which would be a net reduction of employees on-site. As the Project’s employment opportunities would be nominal and likely filled by individuals who already reside in the area, the Project’s employment opportunities would be within the planned growth for the City. Therefore, the Project would not induce substantial unplanned population growth in the City, and impacts would be less than significant. b. Would the project displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? No Impact. The Project Site does not currently provide housing and is zoned for commercial uses. Construction or operation of the Project would not displace any people or housing. Thus, the Project would not necessitate the construction of replacement housing elsewhere, and no impact would occur.
62 (6,706 square feet) × (0.0047897 employees per square foot) = approximately 33 employees, based on the CovinaValley Unified Developer Fee Justification Study, September 7, 2021.

Page 788 of 2700 ends

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
a. Result in substantial adverse physical
impacts associated with the provision of new
or physically altered governmental facilities,
need for new or physically altered
governmental facilities, the construction of
which could cause significant environmental
impacts, in order to maintain acceptable
service ratios, response times, or other
performance objectives for any of the public
services:
i) Fire protection? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
ii) Police protection? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
iii) Schools? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
iv) Parks? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
v) Other public facilities? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
Explanation of Checklist Responses
a.i) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for fire protection services? Less Than Significant Impact. The City of Covina, which is served by Los Angeles County Fire Department (LACoFD) Battalions 2 and 16 in Division II, has three fire stations: Station 152 at 807 West Cypress Avenue (approximately 0.38 miles northeast of the Project Site); Station 154 at 401 North Second Avenue (approximately 1.1 miles southeast of the Project Site); and Station 153 at 1577 East Cypress Avenue (approximately 2.9 miles northeast of the Project Site).63 LACoFD services include fire suppression, emergency medical service (paramedics), hazardous materials, health hazmat, urban search and rescue, lifeguard services, K-9 (search and arson), fire & rescue helicopters, and large animal rescue operations.64 According to CalFire, the Project Site is not located within a Fire Hazard Area or a state responsibility area.65 During construction 63 City of Covina, Fire Department & Paramedic Services, https://covinaca.gov/administration/page/fire-departmentparamedic-services, accessed June 30, 2022. 64 City of Covina, Adopted Budget FY 2021–22.
65 California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, Fire Hazard Severity Zones Maps, FHSZ Viewer, https://egis.fire.ca.gov/FHSZ/, accessed April 5, 2022.

Page 789 of 2700 ends

_____________________________________________________________________________________________ City of Covina Avid Hotel Project
July 2023 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
96 of the Project, staging would occur within the Project Site. Access to and along Azusa Avenue adjacent to the Project Site would remain unobstructed, and Glentana Street would remain accessible to emergency vehicles. During operation, as the Project would not develop residential uses, the Project would not generate a permanent residential service population. While the Project would result in an estimated net reduction of 18 employees on-site, the Project’s hotel uses would introduce short-term guests on-site. As such, the Project would have an increased demand of fire protection services when compared to existing conditions. However, the Project would be required to comply with the California Fire Code, which the City has adopted by reference per CMC Section

14.12.010. The City of Covina’s fire suppression, prevention, education, permitting/planning, and inspection services are provided pursuant to a contract with the LACoFD.66 Specifically, the Project would comply with LACoFD requirements related to fire sprinkler systems, fire flow, fire alarms, and emergency access. Adequate access for emergency vehicles to Azusa Avenue would be provided by a new Project driveway. While the Project would not propose changes within major public streets such as Azusa Avenue, the Project would relocate an existing alley less than 100 feet to the east within the Project Site. The relocated alley would still provide ingress and egress along Glentana Street, which is a dead-end street to the east (i.e., not an evacuation route).

Furthermore, the Project would be required to undergo site plan review and obtain approval from the City to verify that the Project complies with all applicable safety and access requirements.

Furthermore, in City of Hayward v. Board of Trustees of California State University Ruling (2015) 242 Cal. App. 4th 833, the court found that Section 35 of Article XIII of the California Constitution requires local agencies to provide public safety services, including fire protection, and that it is reasonable to conclude that the City will comply with that provision to ensure that public safety services are provided.67 Therefore, the Project is not anticipated to affect fire protection demands to the extent that new or physically altered fire facilities would be required. Impacts on fire protection services are anticipated to be less than significant. a.ii) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for police protection services? Less Than Significant Impact. The Covina Police Department (CPD) employs 99 personnel to provide full public safety services to the City’s 48,619 citizens over a 7-square-mile area.68 The department is located at 444 N. Citrus Avenue, approximately 1.1 miles east of the Project Site.

Specifically, the Project Site is located within the CPD West Service Area.69 As the Project does not involve the development of housing, the Project would not increase the permanent service population on-site and law enforcement demands from the Project Site. The Project would generate 15 employees (a net reduction of 18 employees) and short-term hotel guests on-site.

During construction, the Project Site would implement temporary security measures, such as fencing, lighting, and locked entry to secure the site. During operation, the Project would include surveillance security devices and safety lighting in interior and exterior areas of the Project. In addition, as with other projects, the Project would be required to pay any development fees and local taxes, which would support any expansion of police protection services that may be required 66 City of Covina, Adopted Budget FY 2021–22.
67 City of Hayward v. Board of Trustees of the California State University (2015) 242 Cal. App. 4th 833, 843, 847. 68 City of Covina, Adopted Budget FY 2021–22.
69 City of Covina, Service Area Policing, https://covinapd.org/operations-division/#service-area-policing, accessed July 28, 2022.

Page 790 of 2700 ends

_____________________________________________________________________________________________ City of Covina Avid Hotel Project
July 2023 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
97 based on growth within the City. However, no capital improvements related to police services within the City are currently being planned.70 Furthermore, in City of Hayward v. Board of Trustees of California State University Ruling (2015) 242 Cal. App. 4th 833, the court found that Section 35 of Article XIII of the California Constitution requires local agencies to provide public safety services, including police protection, and that it is reasonable to conclude that the city will comply with that provision to ensure that public safety services are provided.71 Therefore, the Project is not anticipated to affect police protection demands to the extent that new or physically altered police protection facilities would be required. Impacts on police protection services are anticipated to be less than significant.
a.iii) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for schools? No Impact. The Project Site is located within the Covina-Valley Unified School District and is served by Workman Elementary School (grades K-5), Traweek Middle School (grades 6-8), and Covina High School (grades 9-12).72 The Project would provide hotel uses and would not house residents that could, in turn, generate school students. In addition, under existing conditions, the Project Site is occupied by a 6,221-square-foot building and a 485-square-foot building with commercial uses, which are estimated to currently provide approximately 33 employees.73 The Project would provide 15 employment opportunities; thus, the Project would result in a net reduction of 18 employment opportunities and would not result in a new student population from the Project Site. Furthermore, the Project would be subjected to levied developer fees applicable to both new construction and reconstruction projects, pursuant to Education Code Section 17620, to support school facilities. The Project is not anticipated to create demands on public school facilities to the extent that new or physically altered facilities would be required. Therefore, no impact would occur.
a.iv) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for parks? Less Than Significant Impact. Parks and recreational facilities in the vicinity of the Project Site are operated and maintained by the City of Covina Parks & Recreation Department. Nearby parks and recreational facilities include Covina Park at 301 4th Avenue (0.71 miles southeast); Edna Park at 220 W. Edna Place (0.84 miles northeast); Hollenbeck Park at 1250 N. Hollenbeck Avenue (0.93 miles northeast); Heritage Plaza Park at 400 N. Citrus Avenue (1 mile east); Cougar Park at 150 W. Puente Street (1.1 miles southeast); Covina Senior and the Community Center at 815 70 City of Covina, Capital Improvement Program, Fiscal Year 2022. The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is a projection of the City’s capital investments over a five‐year period. 71 City of Hayward v. Board of Trustees of the California State University (2015) 242 Cal. App. 4th 833, 843, 847. 72 Covina-Valley Unified School District, School Locator, http://apps.schoolsitelocator.com/?districtCode=75922&address=578%20n%20azusa%20ave, accessed April 6, 2022.
73 (6,706 square feet) × (0.0047897 employees per square foot) = approximately 33 employees, based on the CovinaValley Unified Developer Fee Justification Study, September 7, 2021.

Page 791 of 2700 ends

_____________________________________________________________________________________________ City of Covina Avid Hotel Project
July 2023 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
98 N. Barranca Avenue (1.4 miles northeast), and Kelby Park at 815 Barranca Avenue (1.47 miles northeast).74
As discussed above, the Project proposes the development of a 68-room hotel and employment of 15 hotel staff. The Project would also provide an indoor fitness area and outdoor patio area onsite for use by hotel guests. The Project would not develop residential uses and would not increase demands for park facilities from permanent residents. As such, the Project would not affect the City’s current parkland to population ratio of 1.3 acres of open space for each 1,000 residents.75 In addition, as described above, the Project would result in a net reduction of employees on-site. During Project construction and operation, employees would be anticipated to use the parks near their homes during non-work hours. As such, the demand that employees would have on parks would not increase when compared to existing conditions. Furthermore, the Project would provide short-term stays for hotel guests and would not provide long-term residences. Thus, any demand for usage of parks by hotel guests would be negligible. Overall, the Project is not anticipated to create new or additional demands to the extent that new or physically altered parks would be required. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. a.v) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for other public facilities? Less Than Significant Impact. The Covina Public Library provides library services to the City from its location at 234 N. Second Avenue, approximately 1.15 miles southeast of the Project Site. As discussed above, the Project’s hotel uses would result in a net reduction of employees on-site. During Project construction and operation, employees would be anticipated to use the libraries or near their homes during non-work hours. As such, the demand that employees would have on libraries would not increase when compared to existing conditions. In addition, the Project would provide short-term stays for hotel guests and would not provide long-term residences.

Thus, any demand for usage of libraries by hotel guests would be negligible. Overall, the Project is not anticipated to create new or additional demands to the extent that new or physically altered libraries would be required. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. 74 City of Covina, Parks & Facilities, https://covinaca.gov/parksrec/page/parks-facilities, accessed July 28, 2022. 75 City of Covina, General Plan, Natural Resources and Open Space Element, 2000, page D-20.

Page 792 of 2700 ends

_____________________________________________________________________________________________ City of Covina Avid Hotel Project
July 2023 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
99 XVI. RECREATION
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
a. Would the project increase the use of existing
neighborhood and regional parks or other
recreational facilities such that substantial
physical deterioration of the facility would
occur or be accelerated?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
b. Does the project include recreational facilities
or require the construction or expansion of
recreational facilities which might have an
adverse physical effect on the environment?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
Explanation of Checklist Responses
a. Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated?
Less Than Significant Impact. As described above for Checklist Question XV.a.iv, the Project would not develop residential uses and would not increase demands for park and recreational facilities from permanent residents. As such, the Project would not affect the City’s current parkland to population ratio of 1.3 acres of open space for each 1,000 residents.76 In addition, the Project would result in a net reduction of employees on-site. During Project construction and operation, employees would be anticipated to use the parks near their homes during non-work hours. As such, the demand that employees would have on parks would not increase when compared to existing conditions. Furthermore, the Project would provide short-term stays for hotel guests with an indoor fitness area and outdoor patio area on-site. The demand for existing parks and recreational facilities by hotel guests would be negligible. Thus, the Project would not increase the use of existing parks and recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of facilities would occur or be accelerated. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.
b. Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment?
No Impact. The Project proposes the development of a 68-room hotel including an indoor fitness area and outdoor patio area on-site for use by hotel guests. As stated above, the Project is not anticipated to substantially increase the demand on parks and recreation facilities in the City. The Project would not require construction or expansion of recreational facilities. Therefore, no impact would occur.
76 City of Covina, General Plan, Natural Resources and Open Space Element, 2000, page D-20.

Page 793 of 2700 ends

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
a. Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or
policy addressing the circulation system,
including transit, roadway, bicycle, and
pedestrian facilities?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
b. Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA
Guidelines Section 15064.3, subdivision (b)? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
c. Substantially increase hazards due to a
geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves
or dangerous intersections) or incompatible
uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
d. Result in inadequate emergency access? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
Explanation of Checklist Responses
The discussion and analysis in this section are based, in part, on the Avid Hotel – Technical Memorandum (Transportation Memo) prepared by Jano Baghdanian & Associates for the Project, which is included as Appendix G of this IS/MND. Documentation of the City’s completed review and approval of the Transportation Memo is also included in Appendix G of this IS/MND. a. Would the project conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities? Less Than Significant Impact. The Project was reviewed in accordance with the City of Covina Transportation Study Guidelines for Vehicle Miles Traveled and Level of Service Assessment (October 2020). The discussion related to VMT is provided below in response to Checklist Question XVII.b. According to the guidelines, a LOS analysis shall be required for a proposed project when either the a.m. or p.m. peak hour trip generation from the proposed development is expected to exceed 100 vehicle trips and for projects that will add 51 or more trips during either the a.m. or p.m. peak hours to any intersection.

As detailed in the Transportation Memo, the Project would generate 21 net trips in the a.m. peak hour on weekdays, 27 net trips in the p.m. peak hour on weekdays, and 49 peak hour trips on Saturdays. The Project would generate fewer than 100 a.m. and p.m. peak hour trips, and the Project would not add 51 or more trips during the a.m. or p.m. peak hour to any nearby intersection. Therefore, a comprehensive traffic study with LOS analysis is not required.

With regard to transit, the nearest bus stop is approximately 443 feet south of the Project Site, and the Covina Metrolink Station is located approximately 1 mile northeast of the Project Site. As the Project construction staging would be limited to the Project Site, the Project would not obstruct the transit stops or impede operation of the vicinity’s transit options. During operation, the Project would result in a net reduction of employees on-site and a generation of short-term hotel guests.

Page 794 of 2700 ends

_____________________________________________________________________________________________ City of Covina Avid Hotel Project
July 2023 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
101
As such, the Project would not be anticipated to generate an increase in ridership that would impair transit services.

Per the City of Covina Bicycle Master Plan, a Class II bike lane is proposed along Azusa Avenue adjacent to the Project Site.77 As the Project construction staging would be limited to the Project Site, the Project would not impede the planning or construction of the bicycle lane during the Project’s construction activities. In addition, the Project’s new right-turn ingress and egress driveway along Azusa Avenue would not have any visual or physical obstructions that would impede the construction or operation of the bicycle lane or pedestrian safety. Furthermore, as detailed in response to Checklist Question No. XVII.c, the Project’s generated outbound trips from the Azusa Avenue driveway in the a.m. and p.m. peak hours would not impact the northbound left-turn lane on Azusa Avenue at the intersection with Front Street. Moreover, the Project’s new driveway along Azusa Avenue and relocated alley along Glentana Street provide adequate widths for vehicle access and proper placement for clear visibility to ensure the safety of pedestrians and cyclists.

Therefore, the Project would not conflict with programs, plans, ordinances, or policies addressing the circulation system, and impacts would be less than significant. b. Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, subdivision (b)?
Less Than Significant Impact. The Project was reviewed in accordance with the City of Covina Transportation Study Guidelines for Vehicle Miles Traveled and Level of Service Assessment (October 2020). As provided in the Transportation Memo, three types of screening from the City Transportation Study Guidelines were applied to the Project. A Project may be screened out from project-level assessment using three types of screening methods: Transit Priority Area (TPA) Screening; Low VMT Area Screening; and Project Type Screening. Should a project comply with at least one of the three above-mentioned screening steps, the project’s VMT impacts would be considered to be less than significant.

Transit Priority Area (TPA) Screening—Projects located within a TPA may be presumed to have a less-than-significant VMT impact if there is no substantial evidence otherwise.78 However, this presumption may not be appropriate if the project: 1) has a FAR of less than 0.75; 2) includes more parking than required by the City; 3) is inconsistent with the applicable SCS (as determined by the lead agency, with input from SCAG); or 4) replaces affordable residential units with a smaller number of moderate- or high-income residential units.

According to the City’s VMT Screening Tool, the Project is located in a TPA. In addition, the Project would result in a FAR of 0.82 and would provide less parking (55 spaces) than required (68 spaces). Furthermore, as described in the Checklist Section XI, the Project would be consistent with the SCAG RTP/SCS. As there are no existing residential units on-site, the 77 City of Covina, Bicycle Master Plan, 2011, Figure 4-1. 78 A TPA is defined as a half-mile area around an existing major transit stop or an existing stop along a high-quality transit corridor per Public Resources Code definitions. Public Resources Code Section 21064.3 defines a “major transit stop” as a site containing an existing rail transit station, a ferry terminal served by either a bus or rail transit service, or the intersection of two or more major bus routes with a frequency of service interval of 15 minutes or less during the morning and afternoon peak commute periods. Public Resources Code Section 21155 defines a “high-quality transit corridor” as a corridor with fixed route bus service with service intervals no longer than 15 minutes during peak commute hours.

Page 795 of 2700 ends

_____________________________________________________________________________________________ City of Covina Avid Hotel Project
July 2023 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
102
proposed hotel would not replace affordable residential units with a smaller number of moderateor high-income residential units. As such, the Project would satisfy the TPA screening criteria such that Project VMT impacts would be less than significant.

Low VMT Area Screening—Residential and office projects located within a low VMT-generating area may be presumed to have a less-than-significant VMT impact if there is no substantial evidence otherwise. In addition, other employment-related and mixed-use land use projects may qualify for the use of screening if the project can reasonably be expected to generate VMT per resident, per worker, or per service population that is similar to the existing land uses in the low VMT area. Although the 68-room hotel is local-serving in nature and there is nothing unique about the Project that would attract patrons from outside of the City, as detailed in the Transportation Memo, use of the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments VMT Screening Tool showed that the Project is not located within a low VMT area. As such, the Project would not satisfy the Low VMT Area Screening criteria.

Project Type Screening—Some project types have been identified as having the presumption of a less than significant impact. The City’s Transportation Study Guidelines include a list of uses that can be presumed to have a less-than-significant VMT impact, if there is no substantial evidence otherwise, as their uses are local serving in nature. Included on this list are “Localserving hotels (e.g., non-destination hotels)” and “Local serving retail projects with a total square footage less than 50,000 square feet.”
The Project would include 68 hotel rooms and comprise 30,200 square feet, which would fall within the 50,000 square feet limit identified by the Transportation Study Guidelines. The Project is designed to provide lodging to visitors and guests of local businesses and would not include a restaurant or large indoor and outdoor gathering spaces for events or conferences. No unique features that would attract patrons from outside of the City would be proposed. Given the Project’s size and amenities provided, the Project would be considered a local serving, non-destination hotel. As such, the Project would satisfy the Project Type Screening criteria such that Project VMT impacts would be considered less than significant.

Therefore, based on the above and as detailed in the Transportation Memo, the Project would satisfy two of three screening criteria and would not require a comprehensive VMT analysis.

Project impacts related to VMT would be less than significant. c. Would the project substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
Less Than Significant Impact. Impacts regarding the potential increase of hazards due to a geometric design feature generally relate to the design of access points to and from a site, and may include safety, operational, or capacity impacts. Impacts can be related to vehicle/vehicle, vehicle/bicycle, or vehicle/pedestrian conflicts as well as to operational delays caused by vehicles slowing and/or queuing to access a site. These conflicts may be created by the driveway configuration or through the placement of driveway(s) in areas of inadequate visibility, adjacent to bicycle or pedestrian facilities, or too close to busy or congested intersections.

The Project would provide a new 26-foot-wide driveway along Azusa Avenue, which would be limited to right-turn ingress and egress due to the raised median located along the center of Azusa Avenue. Vehicles that exist the Project Site from this driveway can proceed northbound along

Page 796 of 2700 ends

_____________________________________________________________________________________________ City of Covina Avid Hotel Project
July 2023 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
103
Azusa Avenue and make a U-turn where the raised median ends at the intersection of Front Street and Azusa Avenue. As calculated in the Transportation Memo, the Project would generate 12 net outbound trips in the a.m. peak hour and 11 net outbound trips in the p.m. peak hour. The analysis provided therein concluded that even if all of the outbound trips proceed to make a U-turn at the intersection of Front Street and Azusa Avenue, the northbound left-turn lane has 220 feet length of capacity and would not be projected to be impacted by the Project.

The Project would relocate the existing alley along Glentana Street to less than 100 feet to the east within the Project Site. This new driveway and portion of an alley would be 25 feet wide along Glentana Street. Access from this driveway will have no right- or left-turn restrictions given the low volume of inbound and outbound traffic during the a.m. and p.m. peak hour. (The Project would generate a net 9 inbound trips in the a.m. peak hour and 16 inbound trips in the p.m. peak hour. The outbound trips are described above.)
Both Project driveways would provide adequate widths for vehicle access and proper placement for clear visibility to ensure the safety of pedestrians and cyclists.

In addition, the Project would provide a 30-minute pickup/drop-off area along a segment of Glentana Street near the street entrance of the proposed building within the southwestern portion of the Project Site. This area is proposed to have a length of 40 feet and is subject to approval by the City’s traffic engineer.

Furthermore, the proposed uses would be consistent with the surrounding uses (i.e., commercial and retail) and would not introduce hazards due to incompatible uses. Therefore, based on the above, the Project would not substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature or incompatible uses, and impacts would be less than significant. d. Would the project result in inadequate emergency access? Less Than Significant Impact. Construction activities associated with the Project could potentially impact the provision of emergency services by the LACoFD and the CPD in the vicinity of the Project Site as a result of construction impacts to the surrounding roadways. As stated in the City’s Safety Element, all major public streets serve as the principal evacuation routes.79 For the Project, the nearest disaster routes would include Azusa Avenue, which is immediately west of the Project Site, and the San Bernardino Freeway (I-10), which is located approximately 1.25 miles south of the Project Site. During Project construction, staging would occur only within the Project Site. Access to and along Azusa Avenue adjacent to the Project Site would remain unobstructed, and Glentana Street would remain accessible to emergency vehicles. The Project would also be required to undergo site plan review and obtain approval from the City to verify that the Project complies with all applicable safety and access requirements. The completed Project would provide a new driveway along Azusa Avenue, which would provide adequate access for emergency vehicles to the site. While the Project would not propose changes within major public streets such as Azusa Avenue, the Project would relocate an existing alley along Glentana Street to less than 100 feet to the east within the Project Site. However, the relocated alley would still provide ingress and egress along Glentana Street, which is a dead-end street to the east (i.e., not an evacuation route). As such, the Project would not result in inadequate emergency access, and impacts would be less than significant.
79 City of Covina, General Plan, Safety Element, 2000, Section VII.

Page 797 of 2700 ends

_____________________________________________________________________________________________ City of Covina Avid Hotel Project
July 2023 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
104
XVIII. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES
Would the project cause a substantial adverse
change in the significance of a tribal cultural
resource, defined in Public Resources Code
Section 21074 as either a site, feature, place,
cultural landscape that is geographically
defined in terms of the size and scope of the
landscape, sacred place or object with cultural
value to a California Native American tribe,
and that is:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
a. Listed or eligible for listing in the California
Register of Historical Resources, or in a local
register of historical resources as defined in
Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(k)?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
b. A resource determined by the lead agency, in
its discretion and supported by substantial
evidence to be significant pursuant to criteria
set forth in subdivision (c) of Public
Resources Code Section 5024.1? In applying
the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of
Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the
lead agency shall consider the significance of
the resource to a California Native American
tribe.
☐ ☒ ☐ ☐
Explanation of Checklist Responses
a. Would the Project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(k)?
Less Than Significant Impact. As discussed above for Checklist Question V.a and evaluated in the Cultural Resources Identification Memorandum (Appendix B of this IS/MND), no historical resources were identified within the Project Site as a result of the SCCIC records search; literature, map, and aerial photo reviews; historical society consultation; pedestrian survey; and California and City Register evaluations. As such, there are no known tribal cultural resources that exist on the site that are eligible for listing on the California Register of Historical Resources or in a local register. Therefore, the Project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource that is listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources. Impacts would be less than significant.
b. Would the Project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place or object with cultural value to a California Native

Page 798 of 2700 ends

_____________________________________________________________________________________________ City of Covina Avid Hotel Project
July 2023 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
105
American tribe, and that is a resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1? In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe.

Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. In compliance with AB 52 (PRC 21074), which requires tribal consultation as part of the CEQA process, the City initiated consultation in April 2022. The City received a request for consultation from Chairman Andrew Salas, chairperson of the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians—Kizh Nation (Kizh Nation).

Consultation occurred on May 10, 2022, between the City and Kizh Nation representatives regarding the Project. As discussed in more detail in Appendix H, the Kizh Nation asserted that the area was sensitive for tribal cultural resources based on ethnographic and historical documentation of past Native American use. In discussion with the City and as provided in correspondence dated October 22, 2021, Chairperson Salas stated that the Project Site is located within the boundaries of Kizh ancestral territory and that there is a potential to impact Kizh Nation tribal cultural resources during Project construction.

As a result, Mitigation Measures TCR-1, TCR-2, and TCR-3 provided by the Kizh Nation will be implemented such that in the event of any discovery of unknown tribal cultural resources during Project construction activities, impacts would be reduced to a less-than-significant level.

Mitigation Measure TCR-1: Retain a Native American Monitor Prior to Commencement of Ground-Disturbing Activities
A. The Project applicant shall retain a Native American Monitor from or approved by the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians—Kizh Nation. The monitor shall be retained prior to the commencement of any “ground-disturbing activity” for the subject project at the Project Site. “Ground disturbing activity” shall include, but is not limited to, demolition, pavement removal, potholing, auguring, grubbing, tree removal, boring, grading, excavation, drilling, and trenching.

B. A copy of the executed monitoring agreement shall be submitted to the Project applicant prior to the earlier of the commencement of any ground-disturbing activity, or the issuance of any permit necessary to commence a ground-disturbing activity.

Monitor logs will identify and describe any discovered TCRs, including but not limited to, Native American cultural and historical artifacts, remains, places of significance, etc., (collectively, tribal cultural resources, or “TCR”), as well as any discovered Native American (ancestral) human remains and burial goods. Copies of monitor logs will be provided to the Project applicant upon written request to the Tribe.

Page 799 of 2700 ends

_____________________________________________________________________________________________ City of Covina Avid Hotel Project
July 2023 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
106
D. On-site tribal monitoring shall conclude upon the latter of the following (1) written confirmation to the Kizh from a designated point of contact for the Project applicant that all ground-disturbing activities and phases that may involve ground-disturbing activities on the Project Site or in connection with the project are complete; or (2) a determination and written notification by the Kizh to the Project applicant that no future, planned construction activity and/or development/construction phase at the Project Site possesses the potential to impact Kizh TCRs.

Mitigation Measure TCR-2: Unanticipated Discovery of Human Remains and Associated Funerary Objects
A. Native American human remains are defined in PRC 5097.98 (d)(1) as an inhumation or cremation, and in any state of decomposition or skeletal completeness. Funerary objects, called associated grave goods in Public Resources Code Section 5097.98, are also to be treated according to this statute.

B. If Native American human remains and/or grave goods discovered or recognized on the Project Site, then all construction activities shall immediately cease. Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 dictates that any discoveries of human skeletal material shall be immediately reported to the County Coroner and all grounddisturbing activities shall immediately halt and shall remain halted until the coroner has determined the nature of the remains. If the coroner recognizes the human remains to be those of a Native American or has reason to believe they are Native American, he or she shall contact, by telephone within 24 hours, the Native American Heritage Commission, and Public Resources Code Section 5097.98 shall be followed.

C. Human remains and grave/burial goods shall be treated alike per California Public Resources Code section 5097.98(d)(1) and (2).

D. Construction activities may resume in other parts of the Project Site at a minimum of 200 feet away from discovered human remains and/or burial goods, if the Kizh determines in its sole discretion that resuming construction activities at that distance is acceptable and provides the project manager express consent of that determination (along with any other mitigation measures the Kizh monitor and/or archaeologist deems necessary). (CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f).) E. Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment for discovered human remains and/or burial goods. Any historic archaeological material that is not Native American in origin (non-TCR) shall be curated at a public, non-profit institution with a research interest in the materials, such as the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County or the Fowler Museum, if such an

Page 800 of 2700 ends

_____________________________________________________________________________________________ City of Covina Avid Hotel Project
July 2023 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
107
institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the archaeological material, it shall be offered to a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes.

F. Any discovery of human remains/burial goods shall be kept confidential to prevent further disturbance.

Mitigation Measure TCR-3: Procedures for Burials and Funerary Remains A. As the Most Likely Descendant (“MLD”), the Koo-nas-gna Burial Policy shall be implemented. To the Tribe, the term “human remains” encompasses more than human bones. In ancient as well as historic times, Tribal Traditions included, but were not limited to, the preparation of the soil for burial, the burial of funerary objects with the deceased, and the ceremonial burning of human remains.

B. If the discovery of human remains includes four or more burials, the discovery location shall be treated as a cemetery and a separate treatment plan shall be created.

C. The prepared soil and cremation soils are to be treated in the same manner as bone fragments that remain intact. Associated funerary objects are objects that, as part of the death rite or ceremony of a culture, are reasonably believed to have been placed with individual human remains either at the time of death or later; other items made exclusively for burial purposes or to contain human remains can also be considered as associated funerary objects. Cremations will either be removed in bulk or by means as necessary to ensure complete recovery of all sacred materials.

D. In the case where discovered human remains cannot be fully documented and recovered on the same day, the remains will be covered with muslin cloth and a steel plate that can be moved by heavy equipment placed over the excavation opening to protect the remains. If this type of steel plate is not available, a 24-hour guard should be posted outside of working hours. The Tribe will make every effort to recommend diverting the project and keeping the remains in situ and protected.

If the project cannot be diverted, it may be determined that burials will be removed.

E. In the event preservation in place is not possible despite good faith efforts by the project applicant/developer and/or landowner, before ground-disturbing activities may resume on the Project Site, the landowner shall arrange a designated site location within the footprint of the project for the respectful reburial of the human remains and/or ceremonial objects.

F. Each occurrence of human remains and associated funerary objects will be stored using opaque cloth bags. All human remains, funerary objects, sacred objects and objects of cultural patrimony will be removed to a secure container on site if possible. These items should be retained and reburied within six months of recovery. The site of reburial/repatriation shall be on the Project Site but at a location agreed upon between the Tribe and the landowner at a site to be protected in perpetuity. There shall be no publicity regarding any cultural materials recovered.

Page 801 of 2700 ends

_____________________________________________________________________________________________ City of Covina Avid Hotel Project
July 2023 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
108
G. The Tribe will work closely with the project’s qualified archaeologist to ensure that the excavation is treated carefully, ethically and respectfully. If data recovery is approved by the Tribe, documentation shall be prepared and shall include (at a minimum) detailed descriptive notes and sketches. All data recovery-related forms of documentation shall be approved in advance by the Tribe. If any data recovery is performed, once complete, a final report shall be submitted to the Tribe and the NAHC. The Tribe does NOT authorize any scientific study or the utilization of any invasive and/or destructive diagnostics on human remains.

Page 802 of 2700 ends

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
a. Require or result in the relocation or
construction of new or expanded water,
wastewater treatment, or storm water
drainage, electric power, natural gas, or
telecommunications facilities, the
construction or relocation of which could
cause significant environmental effects?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
b. Have sufficient water supplies available to
serve the project and reasonably foreseeable
future development during normal, dry, and
multiple dry years?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
c. Result in a determination by the wastewater
treatment provider which serves or may
serve the project that it has adequate
capacity to serve the project’s projected
demand in addition to the provider’s existing
commitments?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
d. Generate solid waste in excess of State or
local standards, or in excess of the capacity
of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the
attainment of solid waste reduction goals?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
e. Comply with federal, state, and local
management and reduction statutes and
regulations related to solid waste?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
Explanation of Checklist Responses
a. Would the project require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment, or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects?
Less Than Significant Impact. The Project would involve the demolition of a single-story, 6,221- square-foot commercial building and a single-story, 485-square-foot commercial building and the construction of a three-story, 30,200-square-foot hotel building. As such, the Project Site would undergo a net increase of 23,494 square feet of development. Also, given the increase in intensity of uses, the Project would result in an increase in water demand and wastewater generation, as well as an increase in demand on other utilities, such as electricity, natural gas, and telecommunications. The existing commercial uses on-site are currently served by these utilities.

Page 803 of 2700 ends

_____________________________________________________________________________________________ City of Covina Avid Hotel Project
July 2023 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
110
Water
Water service is provided to the Project Site by the Water Utility Division of the Department of Public Works. Based on the proposed uses, the Project would increase the water demand on-site when compared to existing conditions.

According to the City’s 2020 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP), the reliable quantities of projected water supply for Year 2023 and Year 2024 are 5,552 acre-feet per year (afy) and 5,607 afy, respectively.80 As shown in Table XIX-1, the Project would result in a net increase of 7,159 gallons per day (or approximately 8.0 afy) in water demand. The estimated water consumption of the Project is less than 1 percent of the Water Utility Division’s projected water supply for 2023 and 2024 and would not, therefore, significantly impact existing water service. In addition, the Project would be in compliance with CalGreen (i.e., would provide water-efficient appliances and fixtures) and the City’s Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance, thereby ensuring efficient use of water on-site. Furthermore, the Project would be required to pay water connection fees as applicable. Therefore, the Project would not require or result in the relocation or construction of new water facilities, and impacts would be less than significant.

Table XIX-1
Project Net Water Demand
Land Use Size Generation Rate1 Total (gpd)
Existing Uses to be Removed
Commercial building 6,221 sf 0.200 gpd/sf 1,244 gpd
Commercial building 485 sf 0.200 gpd/sf 97 gpd
Subtotal Existing 1,341 gpd
Proposed Uses
Hotel 68 rm 125 gpd/rm 8,500 gpd
Total Net Water Demand 7,159 gpd

8.0 afy
gpd = gallons per day
sf = square feet
afy = acre-feet per year
Note:

1. Los Angeles County Sanitation District, Table 1 – Loadings for Each Class of Land Use. Consistent with County methodology, the analysis of the Project’s impacts relative to water supply is based on a calculation of the Project’s water demand by applying the sewage generation rates, which also serve to estimate water demand.

Wastewater
The City’s sanitary sewer collection system is managed by the City of Covina Public Works Department. The collection system consists of about 120.5 miles of gravity sewer lines and one pump station. About 98 percent of flows from these local sewers discharge into the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts (LACSD) trunk sewers throughout the community, for transmission, 80 City of Covina, 2020 Urban Water Management Plan, Tables 6-8 and 6-9, based on linear interpolation of 2020 and 2025 data.

Page 804 of 2700 ends

_____________________________________________________________________________________________ City of Covina Avid Hotel Project
July 2023 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
111
treatment, and disposal.81 The remaining sewage generated within City limits is discharged into the adjacent unincorporated areas and the City of West Covina sewer systems, which subsequently discharge into LACSD trunk sewers for transmission, treatment, and disposal. The regional trunk sewer lines deliver wastewater to one or more water reclamation plants owned by LACSD for treatment. The water reclamation plants serving the City include the San Jose Creek Water Reclamation Plant (SJCWRP) in the City of Whittier and the Joint Water Pollution Control Plant (JWPCP) in the City of Carson. According to the City’s 2020 UWMP, the percentage breakdown between these two plants in treating the City’s wastewater in unknown; however, the SJCWRP has a treatment capacity of 100 million gpd, and the JWPCP has a treatment capacity of 300 million gpd.82 As shown in Table XIX-2, the Project would generate a net increase of 7,159 gallons of wastewater per day. As such, the Project would result in a nominal amount of wastewater relative to the treatment capacities. Furthermore, the Project would be required to pay sewer connection fees to the sewer lines available along Azusa Avenue and Glentana Street as applicable.83 Therefore, the Project would not require or result in the relocation or construction of new wastewater facilities, and impacts would be less than significant.

Table XIX-2
Project Net Wastewater Generation
Land Use Size Generation Rate1 Total (gpd)
Existing Uses to be Removed
Commercial building 6,221 sf 0.200 gpd/sf 1,244 gpd
Commercial building 485 sf 0.200 gpd/sf 97 gpd
Subtotal Existing 1,341 gpd
Proposed Uses
Hotel 68 rm 125 gpd/rm 8,500 gpd
Total Net Wastewater Generation 7,159 gpd

8.0 afy
gpd = gallons per day
sf = square feet
afy = acre-feet per year
Note:

1. Los Angeles County Sanitation District, Table 1 – Loadings for Each Class of Land Use.

Stormwater Drainage
As discussed in Checklist Section X, Hydrology and Water Quality, of this IS, the existing storm drainage facilities, coupled with the Project’s proposed drywell ground infiltration system, would be adequate to accommodate Project runoff. As described in the Preliminary Hydrology/LID Memorandum, the proposed drywell ground infiltration system would retain 100 percent of the SWQDv on-site.84 The dry well overflow drains would spill the extra runoff through the curb in Azusa Avenue to mimic existing drainage conditions. No physical modifications to the existing 81 City of Covina, Sewer System Management Plan, Final Report, December 2014. 82 City of Covina, 2020 Urban Water Management Plan.
83 City of Covina, 2014 Sewer System Management Plan, Sewer System Index Map. 84 Rhyton Engineering, Preliminary Hydrology/LID Memorandum, Avid Hotel – Covina, March 23, 2023. See Appendix E of this IS/MND.

Page 805 of 2700 ends

_____________________________________________________________________________________________ City of Covina Avid Hotel Project
July 2023 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
112
municipal stormwater infrastructure in the Project vicinity would be required to handle the Project stormwater runoff. Furthermore, in compliance with CMC Section 8.50.100, the Project’s shortterm construction activities would be required to include implementation of an erosion and sediment control plan and BMPs to ensure that discharges of pollutants are effectively prohibited and will not cause or contribute to an exceedance of water quality standards. All construction and grading activities would comply with applicable laws and regulatory documents, including all applicable City ordinances and the City’s permit regulating discharges into and from the storm drain system. Through such compliance, potential water quality impacts during construction and operation would be avoided or reduced to less than significant levels and would avoid conflicts with water quality standards. Thus, the Project would not require the construction or relocation of new or expanded stormwater facilities and impacts would be less than significant.

Dry Utilities (Electricity, Natural Gas, Telecommunications) SCE and SoCalGas provide electricity and natural gas services, respectively, to the Project Site.

These providers service the existing buildings on the Project Site. As such, Project-related improvements would include connection of existing electricity and natural gas service lines to the proposed hotel building.

SCE’s existing portfolio of resources includes renewable energy (31.4 percent), large hydroelectric (2.3 percent), natural gas (22.3 percent), nuclear (9.2 percent), and other/unspecified power sources (34.8 percent).85 This mix of resources enhances electrical system resilience by not relying on a single transmission source. SCE’s Integrated Resource Plan has a primary objective that includes system reliability, as well as establishing SCE’s planned procurement of energy to meet demands through 2030.86 Therefore, SCE’s long-term forecasts for electricity demand within its service area, which includes the Project Site, would account for Project-related electricity demand. However, should SCE determine that upgrades to existing electrical energy infrastructure would be necessary, resulting from either the demand of the proposed Project or cumulative demand increases, such off-site upgrade projects would be undertaken by SCE and would be subject to environmental review pursuant to CEQA. Attempting to estimate what environmental impacts may result from such electrical utility infrastructure improvements without knowledge of when and where the improvements would take place would be speculative.

SoCalGas is the principal distributor of natural gas in Southern California. Utility-served, statewide natural gas demand is projected to decrease at an annual average rate of 1.1 percent per year through 2035, and total statewide residential gas demand is projected to decrease at an annual average rate of 2.4 percent per year, which is faster than the 1.7 percent annual rate of decline that had been forecasted previously in the 2020 California Gas Report.87 Furthermore, SoCalGas is anticipated to meet a projected extreme peak day demand of 2,827 million cubic feet of natural gas per day in 2023 through a combination of withdrawals from underground storage facilities and flowing pipeline supplies.88 As such, because of its extremely large service area and natural gas supplies, in addition to decreasing natural gas demand, SoCalGas would have adequate capacity to support the Project. Should SoCal Gas determine that upgrades to existing natural gas infrastructure would be necessary, resulting from either the demand of the proposed Project or 85 Southern California Edison, 2021 Power Content Label. 86 Southern California Edison, 2017-2018 Integrated Resource Plan, August 1, 2018. 87 California Gas and Electric Utilities, 2022 California Gas Report. 88 California Gas and Electric Utilities, 2022 California Gas Report.

Page 806 of 2700 ends

_____________________________________________________________________________________________ City of Covina Avid Hotel Project
July 2023 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
113
cumulative demand increases, such off-site upgrade projects would be undertaken by SoCal Gas and would be subject to environmental review pursuant to CEQA.

Telecommunication services are provided to the existing office buildings on the Project Site by private companies. Upgrades to the existing telecommunication infrastructure on the Project Site would involve connecting the proposed hotel building to existing telecommunications connections within the Project Site and in adjacent streets. Upgrades to existing telecommunication facilities and construction of new facilities to meet user demand are determined by telecommunication providers and subject to its own environmental review. Any traffic disruptions associated with telecommunication utility activities within the travel lanes would be addressed through routine traffic control measures.

In summary, the Project would not result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment, stormwater drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities and impacts would be less than significant. b. Would the project have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry, and multiple dry years? Less Than Significant Impact. Due to the proposed size and uses, the Project is not subject to a water supply assessment pursuant to California Water Code Section 10912 criteria.89 As discussed above, water service is provided to the Project Site by the Water Utility Division of the Department of Public Works. The City’s service area covers approximately 7 square miles encompassing the majority of the City of Covina, a portion of the City of West Covina, and an unincorporated portion of Los Angeles County. The City’s main water supply sources include surface water diversions from the San Gabriel River, groundwater pumped from the Main San Gabriel Basin, and imported water, all of which are purchased from the Covina Irrigating Company (CIC).90 According to the City’s 2020 UWMP, the CIC has significantly reduced its reliance on surface water diversions from the San Gabriel River. The City’s secondary water supply source includes treated, imported surface water from the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD) conveyed from the Colorado River Aqueduct and the California Aqueduct and purchased through the Three Valleys Municipal Water District. In the event that CIC water supplies are impacted, the City has the flexibility of relying on its treated imported water connection with Three Valleys District. In compliance with legislative requirements, the UWMP assessed the water service reliability during a normal year, a single dry year, and a five consecutive year drought, along with projections through fiscal year 2044-2045. As detailed in the UWMP, the City would be able to meet the water demands during normal years, single dry years, and five consecutive year drought periods over the next 25 years. Although adequate supplies are anticipated, the cost of those water supplies may become incrementally more expensive.

Therefore, the City will continue to maintain its water shortage contingency plan to encourage 89 In accordance with California Water Code Section 10912, projects subject to CEQA that require a water supply assessment include: (1) a proposed residential development of more than 500 dwelling units; (2) a proposed shopping center or business establishment employing more than 1,000 persons or having more than 500,000 square feet of floor space; (3) a proposed commercial office building employing more than 1,000 persons or having more than 250,000 square feet of floor space; (4) a proposed hotel or motel, or both, having more than 500 rooms; (5) a proposed industrial, manufacturing, or processing plant, or industrial park planned to house more than 1,000 persons, occupying more than 40 acres of land, or having more than 650,000 square feet of floor area; (6) a mixed-use project that includes one or more of the projects specified in this subdivision; or (7) a project that would demand an amount of water equivalent to, or greater than, the amount of water required by a 500 dwelling unit project.
90 City of Covina, 2020 Urban Water Management Plan.

Page 807 of 2700 ends

_____________________________________________________________________________________________ City of Covina Avid Hotel Project
July 2023 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
114
retail customers to reduce water consumption. Furthermore, the City will adhere to mandated statewide reductions. No new water supply, storage, or distribution facilities are identified in the UWMP to address water demands of the City. Accordingly, there would be sufficient water supplies available to serve the Project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry, and multiple dry years. Therefore, impacts to water supplies would be less than significant.
c. Would the project result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments? Less Than Significant Impact. As discussed above, the Project would connect to existing sewer infrastructure surrounding the Project Site. The Project would result in a net increase of wastewater generation of 7,159 gpd. As discussed in Checklist Question XIX.a, the Project would result in a nominal amount of wastewater relative to the combined 400-million-gpd capacity of the SJCWRP and JWPCP. Furthermore, the Project would be required to pay sewer connection fees to the sewer lines available along Azusa Avenue and Glentana Street as applicable. Therefore, Project impacts related to wastewater treatment capacity would be less than significant. d. Would the project generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals?
Less Than Significant Impact. According to the most recently available information from the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle), in 2019, the City of Covina disposed of approximately 48,285 tons of solid waste at a solid waste facility, 239 tons at the Southeast Resource Recovery Facility (a transformation facility), and 3,044 tons of alternative daily cover.91 Of the 16 facilities that received waste from the City, six facilities that accept both construction and demolition waste and municipal solid waste received more than 1,000 tons of waste, including those within and outside Los Angeles County: Azusa Land Reclamation Co.

Landfill, Chiquita Canyon Sanitary Landfill, El Sobrante Landfill, Mid-Valley Sanitary Landfill, Olinda Alpha Landfill, and San Timoteo Sanitary Landfill.

Construction, demolition, and remodel activities occurring within the City generate a significant volume of debris that could be destined for landfills. In order to preserve available landfill space and maintain compliance with SB 1374, pursuant to CMC Chapter 8.09 and Ordinance 18-03, the City requires the recycling or reuse of material generated by construction, demolition, and remodel activities. All covered projects shall reuse, recycle, or divert at least 75 percent (or the statemandated diversion percentage, whichever is greater), of all construction and demolition debris from landfills or disposal sites. Accordingly, the Project would be required to prepare a pre-project recycling plan (PPRP) pursuant to CMC Section 8.09.070 to document the amount and type of materials and waste, the hauler and hauling destination, and the diversion rate. The PPRP would be approved by the City prior to issuance of a building, demolition, or grading permit. As previously discussed, the Project would demolish the existing 6,221-square-foot commercial building and 91 CalRecycle, Jurisdiction Disposal by Facility and Alternative Daily Cover Tons by Facility, Year 2021 for Los Angeles–Covina, https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/LGCentral/DisposalReporting/Destination/DisposalByFacility, accessed April 14, 2022; alternative daily cover refers to cover material other than earthen material placed on the surface of the active face of a municipal solid waste landfill at the end of each operating day to control vectors, fires, odors, blowing litter, and scavenging.

Page 808 of 2700 ends

_____________________________________________________________________________________________ City of Covina Avid Hotel Project
July 2023 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
115
485-square-foot commercial building to construct a 30,200-square-foot hotel building. As shown in Table XIX-3, the Project would generate 595 tons of demolition and construction waste. After accounting for a 75 percent diversion rate, the Project would dispose of approximately 149 tons of waste to landfills.

Table XIX-3
Project Demolition and Construction Waste Generation
Land Use Size
Generation Rate
(lbs/sf)1 Total (tons)
Demolition Waste
Existing commercial building 6,221 sf 158 lbs/sf 491
Existing commercial building 485 sf 158 lbs/sf 38
Construction Waste
Proposed building 30,200 sf 4.34 lbs/sf 66
Total Waste prior to diversion 595
Total Waste after 75% diversion 149
lbs = pounds
sf = square feet
1 lb = 0.0005 ton
Note:

1. USEPA, Estimating 2003 Building-Related Construction and Demolition Materials Amounts, Report No. EPA530-R-09-002, March 2009, Tables 2-2 and 2-4.

Based on available remaining permitted disposal capacity information provided by the Los Angeles County Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan (ColWMP) 2020 Annual Report, the Project’s 149 tons of demolition and construction waste would represent approximately 0.0002 percent of the Azusa Land Reclamation Landfill’s remaining disposal capacity of 64.64 million tons; approximately 0.0003 percent of the Chiquita Canyon Sanitary Landfill’s remaining disposal capacity of 54.42 million tons; approximately 0.0001 percent of the El Sobrante Landfill’s remaining disposal capacity of 137 million tons; approximately 0.0004 percent of the Mid-Valley Sanitary Landfill’s remaining disposal capacity of 35 million tons; approximately 0.001 percent of the Olinda Alpha Landfill’s remaining disposal capacity of 13 million tons; and approximately 0.002 percent of the San Timoteo Sanitary Landfill’s remaining disposal capacity of 6 million tons.92 As such, such landfills would be able to accommodate the estimated 149 tons of post-diversion waste from the Project’s construction activities.

Once operational, solid waste generated by the Project would consist of typical waste from a hotel building. It is anticipated that Project-generated waste would continue to be accepted by the same multiple refuse disposal facilities that currently receive the City’s municipal solid wastes, including those identified above. During operation of the Project, as shown in Table XIX-4, solid waste generated by the hotel rooms and employees would amount to approximately 79 tons per year.

Based on available remaining permitted disposal capacity information provided by the ColWMP 2020 Annual Report, the Project’s 79 tons of operational solid waste would represent the following 92 Los Angeles County, Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan 2020 Annual Report, Appendix E-2, Tables 4 and 6.

Page 809 of 2700 ends

_____________________________________________________________________________________________ City of Covina Avid Hotel Project
July 2023 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
116
percentages at landfills accepting municipal waste from the City: approximately 0.0001 percent of the Azusa Land Reclamation Landfill’s remaining disposal capacity of 64.64 million tons; approximately 0.0001 percent of the Chiquita Canyon Sanitary Landfill’s remaining disposal capacity of 54.42 million tons; approximately 0.00006 percent of the El Sobrante Landfill’s remaining disposal capacity of 137 million tons; approximately 0.0002 percent of the Mid-Valley Sanitary Landfill’s remaining disposal capacity of 35 million tons; approximately 0.0006 percent of the Olinda Alpha Landfill’s remaining disposal capacity of 13 million tons; and approximately

0.001 percent of the San Timoteo Sanitary Landfill’s remaining disposal capacity of 6 million tons.93 As such, such landfills would be able to accommodate waste from the Project’s operations.

Based on the above, Project construction and operation activities would not generate solid waste in excess of state or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals. Therefore, Project impacts to solid waste facilities would be less than significant.

Table XIX-4
Project Operation Waste Generation
Land Use Size Generation Rate1
Total
(tons/year)
Hotel 68 rm 4 lbs/rm/day 50
Hotel 15 emp 10.53 lbs/emp/day 29
Total Waste 79
lbs = pounds
sf = square feet
1 lb = 0.0005 ton
Note:

1. CalRecycle, Estimated Solid Waste Generation Rates,
https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/wastecharacterization/general/rates, accessed April 14, 2022.
e. Would the project comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste?
Less Than Significant Impact. As discussed above, the Project would comply with the state and City diversion requirements by reusing, recycling, or diverting at least 75 percent (or the statemandated diversion percentage, whichever is greater) of all construction and demolition debris from landfills or disposal sites. The Project would prepare a PPRP for approval by the City prior to issuance of a building, demolition, or grading permit. Furthermore, the Project would comply with City requirements to document a Post-Project Compliance Report. Specifically, within 90 calendar days following Project completion, the report must be submitted to the City with weight tickets from all haulers and facilities that handled the Project waste stream. The Project would also comply with AB 341, which set a statewide goal of 75 percent disposal reduction by 2020, by providing clearly marked, source-sorted receptacles to facilitate recycling. The Project would place these waste receptacles separate from the hotel building and, in accordance with CMC Section 8.08.140.A.2, in locations that allow for mechanical collection and which minimize 93 Los Angeles County, Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan 2020 Annual Report, Appendix E-2, Tables 4 and 6.

Page 810 of 2700 ends

_____________________________________________________________________________________________ City of Covina Avid Hotel Project
July 2023 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
117
interference with public rights-of-way, off-street parking, and/or ingress and egress serving the premises. SB 1383 mandates organics recycling for businesses, including hotels with at least 200 rooms and on-site food facility. With 68 rooms and no on-site food facility, the Project would not be subject to organics recycling.

Based on the above, the Project would comply with adopted programs and regulations pertaining to solid waste, and City waste diversion goals, as applicable. Thus, participation in the City’s recycling programs during construction and operation would ensure that the Project would not conflict with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste. Accordingly, the Project would not generate solid waste in excess of state or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals. Therefore, impacts related to solid waste generation would be less than significant.

Page 811 of 2700 ends

_____________________________________________________________________________________________ City of Covina Avid Hotel Project
July 2023 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
118
XX. WILDFIRE
If located in or near state responsibility areas
or lands classified as very high fire hazard
severity zones would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
a. Substantially impair an adopted emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation
plan?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
b. Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other
factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby
expose project occupants to, pollutant
concentrations from a wildfire or the
uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
c. Require the installation or maintenance of
associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel
breaks, emergency water sources, power
lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate
fire risk or that may result in temporary or
ongoing impacts to the environment?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
d. Expose people or structures to significant
risks, including downslope or downstream
flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff,
post-fire slope instability, or drainage
changes?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
Explanation of Checklist Responses
a. If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
No Impact. The Project Site is located in an urbanized area and is not adjacent to any wildland areas. According to CalFire, the Project Site is not located within a Fire Hazard Area or a state responsibility area.94 The nearest Fire Hazard Areas are a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (VHFHSZ) located approximately 2.4 miles southeast of the Project Site near Covina Hills, and a VHFHSZ located approximately 2.6 miles northwest of the Project Site near the Santa Fe Dam.

Therefore, no impact would occur.
b. If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project, due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire? 94 California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, Fire Hazard Severity Zones Maps, FHSZ Viewer, https://egis.fire.ca.gov/FHSZ/, accessed April 5, 2022.

Page 812 of 2700 ends

_____________________________________________________________________________________________ City of Covina Avid Hotel Project
July 2023 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
119
No Impact. The Project Site is not located within or adjacent to a VHFHSZ or state responsibility area. Therefore, no impact would occur.
c. If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment?
No Impact. The Project Site is not located within or adjacent to a VHFHSZ or state responsibility area. Therefore, no impact would occur.
d. If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes?
No Impact. The Project Site is not located within or adjacent to a VHFHSZ or state responsibility area. Therefore, no impact would occur.

Page 813 of 2700 ends

_____________________________________________________________________________________________ City of Covina Avid Hotel Project
July 2023 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
120
XXI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
a. Does the project have the potential to
degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or
wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or restrict the
range of a rare or endangered plant or
animal, or eliminate important examples of
the major periods of California history or
prehistory?
☐ ☒ ☐ ☐
b. Does the project have impacts that are
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable”
means that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed in
connection with the effects of past projects,
the effects of other current projects, and the
effects of probable future projects.)
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
c. Does the project have environmental effects
which will cause substantial adverse effects
on human beings, either directly or indirectly?
☐ ☒ ☐ ☐
Explanation of Checklist Responses
a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory?
Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. As discussed in Checklist Question IV.d, the Project’s removal of three on-site trees has the potential to interfere with a nesting bird or raptor protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. Construction could also potentially occur during breeding, reproduction, and juvenile rearing periods for nesting birds and raptors (i.e., between February 15–August 31). As such, the Project would comply with Mitigation Measure BIO-1 to reduce potential impacts to nesting birds to less than significant.

As discussed in Checklist Section V, the Project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource, and no related impacts would occur. With regard to archaeological resources, there is low sensitivity for significant prehistoric or historic period archaeological resources within the Project Site. Nonetheless, Mitigation Measure CUL-1 is included to require the proper handling and disposition of archaeological resources in the

Page 814 of 2700 ends

Mitigation Measure CUL-1 would ensure that any impacts to archaeological resources would be less than significant.

As discussed in Checklist Question VII.f, the Project Site can be considered to have low to no sensitivity for fossils. Nonetheless, Mitigation Measure GEO-1 is included to require the proper handling and disposition of paleontological resources in the unexpected event that such resources are inadvertently discovered during Project construction. Mitigation Measure GEO-1 would ensure that any impacts to paleontological resources would be less than significant. b. Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects? Less Than Significant Impact. CEQA requires that the analysis of potential project impacts include cumulative impacts. CEQA defines cumulative impacts as “two or more individual effects which, when considered together are considerable or which compound or increase other environmental impacts.”95 This analysis of cumulative impacts need not be as in-depth as the analysis of the Project’s impacts, but instead is to “be guided by the standards of practicality and reasonableness.”96
The City has several proposed development projects under review. The closest project is 0.44 miles from the Project Site, while the others are located 1.0 mile or farther.97 Due to these distances, the physical and site-specific conditions of the Project Site, and with the incorporation of the mitigation measures identified in this IS/MND, the Project would not have impacts that are cumulatively considerable. In addition, although the Project would generate new short-term construction jobs in the Project area, the Project would only generate a limited number of employees to support hotel operations. The Project also does not include residential or commercial components. As such, the Project is not expected to induce any growth in the region.

In addition, as detailed in the preceding sections, the Project would not result in any significant and unmitigable impacts in any environmental categories. The Project would be consistent with regional plans and programs that address environmental factors such as air quality, energy, GHG emissions, transportation, utilities, and other applicable regulations that have been adopted by public agencies. In many cases, including aesthetics, agriculture, biological resources, cultural resources, geology, hazards, land use, mineral resources, noise, public services and recreation, tribal cultural resources, and wildfire, the impacts associated with the Project are either localized to the Project Site or are of such a negligible degree that they would not result in a considerable contribution to any significant cumulative impacts. Therefore, cumulative impacts would be less than significant (not cumulatively considerable) and the Project would not result in a mandatory finding of significance in this regard.
95 State CEQA Guideline, 14 California Code of Regulations, Section 15355, et seq. 96 State CEQA Guideline, 14 California Code of Regulations, Section 15355, et seq. 97 City of Covina, Projects Under Review, https://covinaca.gov/pc/page/projects-under-review, accessed February 2, 2023.

Page 815 of 2700 ends

_____________________________________________________________________________________________ City of Covina Avid Hotel Project
July 2023 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
122
c. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. As discussed in Checklist Sections I through XX of this document, the Project has been determined to have no impacts, less-than-significant impacts, and impacts that are less than significant with incorporation of mitigation measures. Therefore, the Project would not have environmental effects that would cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly, and the impacts would be less than significant.

Page 816 of 2700 ends

_____________________________________________________________________________________________ City of Covina Avid Hotel Project
July 2023 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
123

5. PREPARERS
Lead Agency
City of Covina
Planning Department
125 East College Street
Covina, CA 91723
Brian Lee, Director of Community Development
Mercenia Lugo, Planning Manager
Michael Baker International
3760 Kilroy Airport Way, Suite 270
Long Beach, CA 90806
John Bellas, Project Director
Fareeha Kibriya, QA/QC Manager
Frankie Tong, Project Manager
Eddie Torres, Technical Manager–Air Quality & Noise
Zhe Chen, Technical Manager–Air Quality & Noise
Margo Nayyar, Senior Associate, Department Manager—Cultural Resources Nicholas Hearth, Senior Archaeologist/Principal Investigator Jacob Parsley, Archaeologist
Peter Kloess, Environmental Specialist
Darshan Shivaiah, Technical Specialist–Air Quality & Noise Tina Yuan, Environmental Associate
Winnie Woo, Environmental Associate

Page 817 of 2700 ends

1. Introduction
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City of Covina, as Lead Agency, completed an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) to address and disclose the potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed Avid Hotel Project.

The purpose of the IS/MND is to determine if the proposed project may have a significant effect on the environment and to serve as an informational document for the public and the decisionmakers. The Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the proposed project was posted by the Los Angeles County Clerk on July 6, 2023, and distributed to organizations and individuals have requested the notice. The notice was also published by the City in the local newspaper and submitted to the State Clearinghouse. The comment period for the IS/MND began on July 6, 2023 and ended on August 7, 2023. One comment letter was received and is included herein with responses to the comment letter.

2. Comment Letters
Comment Letter No. 1
Karen Herrera
Transportation Planner, Division of Planning
California Department of Transportation, District 7
100 S. Main Street, MS 16
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Miya Edmonson
Local Development Review/CEQA Branch Chief
California Department of Transportation, District 7
100 S. Main Street, MS 16
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Comment No. 1-1
Thank you for including the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) in the environmental review process for the above referenced MND. The proposed Project includes the development of a hotel consisting of 68 rooms and 55 surface parking spaces on a 36,732-squarefoot site in the City of Covina, California. A total of 30,200 square feet of floor area would be developed, resulting in a total FAR of 0.82:1. The proposed building would consist of three stories and a maximum height of 35 feet. The Project would be located at 578 N. Azusa Avenue on Assessor Parcel Numbers 8432-006-015 and 8432-006-017. The City of Covina is the Lead Agency under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

Response to Comment No. 1-1
This introductory comment provides an overview of the Project and is noted for the record.

Page 818 of 2700 ends

_____________________________________________________________________________________________ City of Covina Avid Hotel Project
October 2023 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration—Responses to Comments 2 Comment No. 1-2
The project locations are near Interstate 10 (I-10). After reviewing the MND, Caltrans has the following comments applicable to the construction period only:
 Cover construction trucks with tarpaulin to avoid spilling debris onto State facilities.

Response to Comment No. 1-2
This comment advises the Project to cover construction trucks with tarpaulin to avoid spilling debris onto State facilities. This comment is noted for the record but does not relate to the Project’s environmental impacts or to the adequacy of the Project’s CEQA document. The City has forwarded this comment to the Project applicant, and the applicant has agreed to comply. The comment will also be forwarded to the decision-makers for review and consideration.

Comment No. 1-3
As a reminder, any transportation of heavy construction equipment and/or materials which requires use of oversized-transport vehicles on State Highways will need a Caltrans transportation permit. Caltrans recommends that the Project limit construction traffic to off-peak periods to minimize the potential impact on State facilities. If construction traffic is expected to cause issues on any State facilities, please submit a construction traffic control plan detailing these issues for Caltrans’ review.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Karen Herrera, the project coordinator, at [email protected] and refer to GTS # 07-LA-2023-04270.

Response to Comment No. 1-3
This comment describes circumstances in which a Caltrans transportation permit and construction traffic control plan would be required. This comment also advises limiting construction traffic to off-peak periods. This comment is noted for the record but does not relate to the Project’s environmental impacts or to the adequacy of the Project’s CEQA document. The City has forwarded this comment to the Project applicant, and the applicant has agreed to comply. The comment will also be forwarded to the decision-makers for review and consideration. The City will contact Caltrans with any comments or questions.

Page 819 of 2700 ends

1. Introduction
This Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) has been prepared in compliance with the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15074(d). Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 requires a Lead Agency to adopt a “reporting or monitoring program for the changes made to the project or conditions of project approval, adopted in order to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment.” State CEQA Guidelines Section 15074(d)requires that a public agency “adopt a program for reporting or monitoring on the changes which it has either required in the project or made a condition of approval to mitigate or avoid significant environmental effects.” The City of Covina is the Lead Agency for the Project and therefore is responsible for administering and implementing the MMRP. According to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15097, a public agency may also delegate reporting or monitoring responsibilities to another public agency or to a private entity which accepts the delegation; however, until mitigation measures have been completed the lead agency remains responsible for ensuring that implementation of the mitigation measures occurs in accordance with the program.

A Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) has been prepared to address the environmental impacts of the Project. The evaluation of impacts in the MND applies mitigation measures needed to avoid or reduce potentially significant environmental impacts. This MMRP is designed to monitor the implementation of mitigation measures identified for the Project.

2. Administrative Procedures and Enforcement
The MMRP shall be enforced throughout all phases of the Project. The Project applicant shall be responsible for implementing each mitigation measure and shall be obligated to provide certification to the appropriate monitoring and/or enforcement agency that each mitigation measure has been implemented. The Project applicant shall maintain records demonstrating compliance with each mitigation measure, and such records shall be made available to the City upon request.

3. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Biological Resources
Mitigation Measure BIO-1: Initiation of construction activities (i.e., initial vegetation clearing) should avoid the migratory bird nesting season (February 15 through August 31), to reduce impacts to migratory birds that may be nesting on the Project site. If construction activities must be initiated during the migratory bird-nesting season, a pre-construction nesting bird survey should be conducted for by a qualified biologist within 3 days (72 hours) prior to the start of project construction activities to determine whether active nests are present within or directly adjacent to the construction zone, in accordance with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act.

If an active nest is found, the nest shall be flagged and mapped on the construction plans along with an appropriate no-work buffer, which will be determined by the biologist based on the species’

Page 820 of 2700 ends

_____________________________________________________________________________________________ City of Covina Avid Hotel Project
October 2023 Mitigated Monitoring and Reporting Program 2 sensitivity to disturbance (typically 50 feet for common, urban-adapted species, 300 feet for other passerine species, and 500 feet for raptors and special-status species). A qualified biologist (with the ability to stop work) shall monitor the nest, and the buffers may be adjusted (including increases or reductions to the buffer) by the qualified biologist on a case-by-case basis taking into consideration the location, type, duration and timing, and severity of work, distance of nest from project activities, surrounding vegetation and line-of-sight between the nest and work areas, and the species’ site-specific level of habituation to the disturbance. The nest area shall be avoided until the nest is vacated and the juveniles have fledged. The nest area shall be demarcated in the field with flagging and stakes or construction fencing. A qualified biologist shall serve as a construction monitor during those periods when construction activities will occur near active nest areas to ensure that no inadvertent impacts on these nests occur. A brief memo report should be prepared by the qualified biologist to document the location of all nests found (if any), their status (i.e., eggs or hatchlings present), existing biological conditions of the project area, and the bird species detected during the survey.
o Enforcement Agency: City of Covina Community Development Department o Monitoring Agency: City of Covina Community Development Department o Monitoring Phase: Pre-construction; construction
o Monitoring Frequency: Once at Project plan check (inclusion in Project construction specifications and submittal of proof of retention of qualified biologist); Monitoring and buffer zones, if necessary, to be determined by qualified biologist and the City (at its discretion) will inspect such monitoring activities and buffer zones periodically during construction o Action(s) Indicating Compliance: Pre-construction nesting bird survey conducted by a qualified biologist; Submittal of compliance report by a qualified biologist
Cultural Resources (Archaeological Resources)
Mitigation Measure CUL-1: Archaeological Resources Inadvertent Discovery. In the event that cultural resources are unearthed during ground-disturbing activities, ground-disturbing activities must be halted or diverted away from the vicinity of the find so that the find can be evaluated. A buffer area of at least 50 feet must be established around the find where construction activities cannot be allowed to continue until a qualified archaeologist examines the newly discovered resource(s) and evaluates the area of the find. Work may be allowed to continue outside of the buffer area. All archaeological resources unearthed by Project construction activities must be evaluated by a qualified professional archaeologist who meets the US Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards. If the resource appears to be significant, the qualified professional archaeologist, working under the direction of the lead agency and in coordination with Native American tribes and/or other stakeholders, will prepare an appropriate treatment plan for the resources. The plan may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to address treatment of the resource(s) along with subsequent laboratory processing, analysis, and curation.
o Enforcement Agency: City of Covina Community Development Department o Monitoring Agency: City of Covina Community Development Department o Monitoring Phase: Construction

Page 821 of 2700 ends

_____________________________________________________________________________________________ City of Covina Avid Hotel Project
October 2023 Mitigated Monitoring and Reporting Program 3 o Monitoring Frequency: Once at Project plan check (inclusion in Project construction specifications and submittal of proof of retention of qualified archaeologist); Monitoring to be determined by qualified archaeologist and the City (at its discretion) will inspect any monitoring activities periodically during construction
o Action(s) Indicating Compliance: Submittal of compliance report and treatment plan (as necessary) by a qualified archaeologist Geology and Soils (Paleontological Resources)
Mitigation Measure GEO-1: Paleontological Resources Inadvertent Discovery. Prior to commencement of any grading activity on-site, the applicant shall retain a qualified paleontologist, subject to the review and approval of the City’s Building Official, or designee. In the event that paleontological resources (e.g., fossils) are unearthed during grading, the paleontology monitor will temporarily halt and/or divert grading activity to allow recovery of paleontological resources.

The area of discovery will be roped off with a 50-foot radius buffer. Once documentation and collection of the find is completed, the monitor will remove the rope and allow grading to recommence in the area of the find. The paleontologist shall prepare a Paleontological Resources Impact Mitigation Program (PRIMP) for the proposed project. The PRIMP shall be consistent with the guidelines of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology (SVP). o Enforcement Agency: City of Covina Community Development Department o Monitoring Agency: City of Covina Community Development Department o Monitoring Phase: Construction
o Monitoring Frequency: Once at Project plan check (inclusion in Project construction specifications and submittal of proof of retention of qualified paleontologist); Monitoring to be determined by qualified paleontologist and the City (at its discretion) will inspect any monitoring activities periodically during construction
o Action(s) Indicating Compliance: Submittal of compliance report and PRIMP (as necessary) by a qualified paleontologist.

Noise
Mitigation Measure NOI-1: To reduce noise impacts due to construction activities, the Project applicant shall demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the City of Covina Community Development Director, that the Project complies with the following:
 Prior to approval of grading plans and/or issuance of building permits, Project plans and specifications shall include a note indicating that noise‐generating construction activities shall only occur between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday, with no activity allowed on Sundays or public holidays, per Covina Noise Ordinance Section 9.40.110. The construction supervisor shall ensure compliance with the Project plans and specifications, and the City of Covina shall conduct periodic inspections, at its discretion.
 Prior to initiation of construction, the contractor shall demonstrate to the City of Covina Community Development Director that equipment is properly muffled, shielded and

Page 822 of 2700 ends

_____________________________________________________________________________________________ City of Covina Avid Hotel Project
October 2023 Mitigated Monitoring and Reporting Program 4 maintained. During all Project construction, the construction contractor shall ensure that power construction equipment (including combustion or electric engines), fixed or mobile, shall be equipped with noise shielding and muffling devices (consistent with manufacturers’ standards) during the entirety of construction of the proposed Project.

The combination of muffling devices and noise shielding shall be capable of reducing noise by at least 5 dBA from non-muffled and shielded noise levels. All equipment shall be properly maintained to ensure that no additional noise, due to worn or improperly maintained parts, would be generated.
 The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that would create the greatest distance between construction‐related noise sources and noise‐sensitive receivers nearest to the Project Site during all construction activities. o Enforcement Agency: City of Covina Community Development Department o Monitoring Agency: City of Covina Community Development Department o Monitoring Phase: Pre-construction; Construction
o Monitoring Frequency: Prior to approval of grading plans and/or issuance of building permits; Periodic inspections by the City (at its discretion) during construction
o Action(s) Indicating Compliance: Submittal of plans indicating that noise‐ generating construction activities shall only occur between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday, with no activity allowed on Sundays or public holidays, per Covina Noise Ordinance Section 9.40.110; Provision of equipment that is properly muffled, shielded and maintained; Supervision by construction supervisor
Tribal Cultural Resources
Mitigation Measure TCR-1: Retain a Native American Monitor Prior to Commencement of Ground-Disturbing Activities
A. The Project applicant shall retain a Native American Monitor from or approved by the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians—Kizh Nation. The monitor shall be retained prior to the commencement of any “ground-disturbing activity” for the subject project at the Project Site. “Ground disturbing activity” shall include, but is not limited to, demolition, pavement removal, potholing, auguring, grubbing, tree removal, boring, grading, excavation, drilling, and trenching.

C. The monitor will complete daily monitoring logs that will provide descriptions of the relevant ground-disturbing activities, the type of construction activities performed, locations of ground disturbing activities, soil types, cultural-related materials, and any other facts, conditions, materials, or discoveries of significance to the Tribe. Monitor logs will identify and describe any discovered TCRs, including but not limited to, Native American cultural and historical artifacts, remains, places of significance, etc.,

Page 823 of 2700 ends

_____________________________________________________________________________________________ City of Covina Avid Hotel Project
October 2023 Mitigated Monitoring and Reporting Program 5 (collectively, tribal cultural resources, or “TCR”), as well as any discovered Native American (ancestral) human remains and burial goods. Copies of monitor logs will be provided to the Project applicant upon written request to the Tribe.

D. On-site tribal monitoring shall conclude upon the latter of the following (1) written confirmation to the Kizh from a designated point of contact for the Project applicant that all ground-disturbing activities and phases that may involve ground-disturbing activities on the Project Site or in connection with the project are complete; or (2) a determination and written notification by the Kizh to the Project applicant that no future, planned construction activity and/or development/construction phase at the Project Site possesses the potential to impact Kizh TCRs.

E. Upon discovery of any TCRs, all construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the discovery shall cease (i.e., not less than the surrounding 50 feet) and shall not resume until the discovered TCR has been fully assessed by the Kizh monitor and/or Kizh archaeologist. The Kizh will recover and retain all discovered TCRs in the form and/or manner the Tribe deems appropriate, in the Tribe’s sole discretion, and for any purpose the Tribe deems appropriate, including for educational, cultural and/or historic purposes.
o Enforcement Agency: City of Covina Community Development Department o Monitoring Agency: City of Covina Community Development Department o Monitoring Phase: Construction
o Monitoring Frequency: Daily during ground-disturbing activities by Native American Monitor
o Action(s) Indicating Compliance: Retention of Native American Monitor by project applicant and submittal of executed monitoring agreement; Daily monitoring logs; Written confirmation to Kizh Nation stating completion of ground-disturbing activities, or determination and written notification by Kizh Nation to the Project applicant that no future, planned construction activity and/or development/construction phase at the Project Site possesses the potential to impact Kizh TCRs
Mitigation Measure TCR-2: Unanticipated Discovery of Human Remains and Associated Funerary Objects
A. Native American human remains are defined in PRC 5097.98 (d)(1) as an inhumation or cremation, and in any state of decomposition or skeletal completeness. Funerary objects, called associated grave goods in Public Resources Code Section 5097.98, are also to be treated according to this statute.

B. If Native American human remains and/or grave goods discovered or recognized on the Project Site, then all construction activities shall immediately cease. Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 dictates that any discoveries of human skeletal material shall be immediately reported to the County Coroner and all ground-disturbing activities shall immediately halt and shall remain halted until the coroner has determined the nature of the remains. If the coroner recognizes the human remains to be those of a Native American or has reason to believe they are Native American, he

Page 824 of 2700 ends

_____________________________________________________________________________________________ City of Covina Avid Hotel Project
October 2023 Mitigated Monitoring and Reporting Program 6 or she shall contact, by telephone within 24 hours, the Native American Heritage Commission, and Public Resources Code Section 5097.98 shall be followed.

C. Human remains and grave/burial goods shall be treated alike per California Public Resources Code section 5097.98(d)(1) and (2).

F. Any discovery of human remains/burial goods shall be kept confidential to prevent further disturbance.
o Enforcement Agency: City of Covina Community Development Department o Monitoring Agency: City of Covina Community Development Department o Monitoring Phase: Construction
o Monitoring Frequency: Upon discovery of human remains o Action(s) Indicating Compliance: Reporting of discoveries to the County Coroner; Construction continued at a 200-foot buffer from discovery; Preservation in place; Curation or offering of verified material Mitigation Measure TCR-3: Procedures for Burials and Funerary Remains A. As the Most Likely Descendant (“MLD”), the Koo-nas-gna Burial Policy shall be implemented. To the Tribe, the term “human remains” encompasses more than human bones. In ancient as well as historic times, Tribal Traditions included, but were not limited to, the preparation of the soil for burial, the burial of funerary objects with the deceased, and the ceremonial burning of human remains.

B. If the discovery of human remains includes four or more burials, the discovery location shall be treated as a cemetery and a separate treatment plan shall be created.

Page 825 of 2700 ends

_____________________________________________________________________________________________ City of Covina Avid Hotel Project
October 2023 Mitigated Monitoring and Reporting Program 7 as associated funerary objects. Cremations will either be removed in bulk or by means as necessary to ensure complete recovery of all sacred materials.

These items should be retained and reburied within six months of recovery. The site of reburial/repatriation shall be on the Project Site but at a location agreed upon between the Tribe and the landowner at a site to be protected in perpetuity. There shall be no publicity regarding any cultural materials recovered.

G. The Tribe will work closely with the project’s qualified archaeologist to ensure that the excavation is treated carefully, ethically and respectfully. If data recovery is approved by the Tribe, documentation shall be prepared and shall include (at a minimum) detailed descriptive notes and sketches. All data recovery-related forms of documentation shall be approved in advance by the Tribe. If any data recovery is performed, once complete, a final report shall be submitted to the Tribe and the NAHC.

The Tribe does NOT authorize any scientific study or the utilization of any invasive and/or destructive diagnostics on human remains.
o Enforcement Agency: City of Covina Community Development Department o Monitoring Agency: City of Covina Community Development Department o Monitoring Phase: Construction
o Monitoring Frequency: Upon discovery of human remains of Native American origin
o Action(s) Indicating Compliance: Designation of cemetery and a separate treatment plan, preservation in place, or reburial/repatriation of human remains; Documentation of data recovery and final report submittal to Tribe and NAHC;

Page 826 of 2700 ends

APPENDIX A
Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas Emissions/Energy Data

Page 827 of 2700 ends

Avid Hotel
Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - per PD
Construction Phase - per AQ Questionnaire
Demolition - Per CalEEMod user's guide and AQ construction questionnaire Grading -
Vehicle Trips - Per Traffic Memo
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - SCAQMD RULE 403 Energy Mitigation - per AQ Operational Questionnaire
Water Mitigation - per AQ Operational questionnaire
Waste Mitigation - AB341

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Parking Lot 55.00 Space 0.49 22,000.00 0
City Park 0.15 Acre 0.15 6,438.17 0
Hotel 68.00 Room 2.27 30,200.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
9 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 33

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Southern California Edison
Operational Year 2024
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
390.98 CH4 Intensity 0.033
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.004
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 30 Date: 7/11/2022 9:25 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 828 of 2700 ends

Mobile Land Use Mitigation -
Mobile Commute Mitigation -
Area Mitigation - Per AQ operational questionnaire

2.0 Emissions Summary
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 22.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 220.00 196.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 5.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 6.00 5.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 6,534.00 6,438.17
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 98,736.00 30,200.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 1.96 0.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.19 8.08
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 2.19 0.00
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.95 8.08
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 0.78 0.00
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 8.36 7.99
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 30 Date: 7/11/2022 9:25 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied !
:
-+'
!
:
!
:
-+'
!
:
!
:
-+'
!
:
!
:
-+'
!
:
!
:
-+'
!
:
-4 ■

Page 829 of 2700 ends

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2023 0.1174 0.9383 0.9875 1.9300e0030.0503 0.0409 0.0912 0.0161 0.0391 0.0552 0.0000 164.4213 164.4213 0.0277 2.4100e003165.8307 2024 0.2074 0.5050 0.5783 1.1200e0030.0131 0.0207 0.0338 3.5300e0030.0199 0.0234 0.0000 94.7665 94.7665 0.0149 1.1600e00395.4852 Maximum 0.2074 0.9383 0.9875 1.9300e0030.0503 0.0409 0.0912 0.0161 0.0391 0.0552 0.0000 164.4213 164.4213 0.0277 2.4100e003165.8307 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2023 0.1174 0.9383 0.9875 1.9300e0030.0325 0.0409 0.0734 9.7100e0030.0391 0.0488 0.0000 164.4212 164.4212 0.0277 2.4100e003165.8305 2024 0.2074 0.5050 0.5783 1.1200e0030.0131 0.0207 0.0338 3.5300e0030.0199 0.0234 0.0000 94.7664 94.7664 0.0149 1.1600e00395.4851 Maximum 0.2074 0.9383 0.9875 1.9300e0030.0325 0.0409 0.0734 9.7100e0030.0391 0.0488 0.0000 164.4212 164.4212 0.0277 2.4100e003165.8305 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 30 Date: 7/11/2022 9:25 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 830 of 2700 ends

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.09 0.00 14.24 32.59 0.00 8.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 7-3-2023 10-2-2023 0.5374 0.5374
2 10-3-2023 1-2-2024 0.5217 0.5217
3 1-3-2024 4-2-2024 0.4865 0.4865
4 4-3-2024 7-2-2024 0.2026 0.2026
Highest 0.5374 0.5374

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 0.1251 1.0000e0051.5700e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0050.0000 3.0600e0033.0600e0031.0000e0050.0000 3.2600e003 Energy 3.8700e0030.0352 0.0296 2.1000e0042.6800e0032.6800e0032.6800e0032.6800e0030.0000 78.8403 78.8403 4.1500e0031.1200e00379.2770 Mobile 0.2405 0.2516 2.2675 4.6600e0030.4887 3.5000e0030.4922 0.1304 3.2500e0030.1336 0.0000 438.0334 438.0334 0.0324 0.0201 444.8223 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 7.5594 0.0000 7.5594 0.4468 0.0000 18.7281 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.5472 4.7130 5.2603 0.0566 1.3800e0037.0853 Total 0.3695 0.2868 2.2986 4.8700e0030.4887 6.1900e0030.4948 0.1304 5.9400e0030.1363 8.1066 521.5898 529.6964 0.5399 0.0226 549.9159 Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 30 Date: 7/11/2022 9:25 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 831 of 2700 ends

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 0.1250 1.0000e0059.1000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.6500e0031.6500e0030.0000 0.0000 1.7300e003 Energy 3.8700e0030.0352 0.0296 2.1000e0042.6800e0032.6800e0032.6800e0032.6800e0030.0000 78.1333 78.1333 4.0900e0031.1100e00378.5664 Mobile 0.2405 0.2516 2.2675 4.6600e0030.4887 3.5000e0030.4922 0.1304 3.2500e0030.1336 0.0000 438.0334 438.0334 0.0324 0.0201 444.8223 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.8899 0.0000 1.8899 0.1117 0.0000 4.6820 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.4378 3.8719 4.3097 0.0453 1.1000e0035.7702 Total 0.3694 0.2868 2.2979 4.8700e0030.4887 6.1800e0030.4948 0.1304 5.9300e0030.1363 2.3277 520.0402 522.3679 0.1935 0.0223 533.8426 Mitigated Operational

0.02 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.01 71.29 0.30 1.38 64.16 1.29 2.92 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 30 Date: 7/11/2022 9:25 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 832 of 2700 ends

4 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 4/11/2024 5/10/2024 5 22 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 7.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 8.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 2 7.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 3 8.00 46 0.45
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 5 13.00 0.00 98.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 4 10.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 8 25.00 10.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 45,300; Non-Residential Outdoor: 15,100; Striped Parking Area: 1,320 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 5
Acres of Paving: 0.49
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 30 Date: 7/11/2022 9:25 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 833 of 2700 ends

3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0106 0.0000 0.0106 1.6000e0030.0000 1.6000e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.6800e0030.0358 0.0336 6.0000e0051.6900e0031.6900e0031.5800e0031.5800e0030.0000 5.2716 5.2716 1.3400e0030.0000 5.3051 Total 3.6800e0030.0358 0.0336 6.0000e0050.0106 1.6900e0030.0123 1.6000e0031.5800e0033.1800e0030.0000 5.2716 5.2716 1.3400e0030.0000 5.3051 Unmitigated Construction On-Site

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Replace Ground Cover
Water Exposed Area
Architectural Coating 1 5.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 30 Date: 7/11/2022 9:25 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 834 of 2700 ends

3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 1.0000e0046.7400e0031.7200e0033.0000e0058.4000e0044.0000e0058.8000e0042.3000e0044.0000e0052.7000e0040.0000 2.8580 2.8580 1.6000e0044.5000e0042.9972 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.0000e0048.0000e0051.1100e0030.0000 3.6000e0040.0000 3.6000e0049.0000e0050.0000 1.0000e0040.0000 0.2870 0.2870 1.0000e0051.0000e0050.2894 Total 2.0000e0046.8200e0032.8300e0033.0000e0051.2000e0034.0000e0051.2400e0033.2000e0044.0000e0053.7000e0040.0000 3.1451 3.1451 1.7000e0044.6000e0043.2866 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 3.9100e0030.0000 3.9100e0035.9000e0040.0000 5.9000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.6800e0030.0358 0.0336 6.0000e0051.6900e0031.6900e0031.5800e0031.5800e0030.0000 5.2716 5.2716 1.3400e0030.0000 5.3051 Total 3.6800e0030.0358 0.0336 6.0000e0053.9100e0031.6900e0035.6000e0035.9000e0041.5800e0032.1700e0030.0000 5.2716 5.2716 1.3400e0030.0000 5.3051 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 30 Date: 7/11/2022 9:25 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 835 of 2700 ends

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0177 0.0000 0.0177 8.5600e0030.0000 8.5600e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.3300e0030.0362 0.0218 5.0000e0051.5100e0031.5100e0031.3900e0031.3900e0030.0000 4.5260 4.5260 1.4600e0030.0000 4.5626 Total 3.3300e0030.0362 0.0218 5.0000e0050.0177 1.5100e0030.0192 8.5600e0031.3900e0039.9500e0030.0000 4.5260 4.5260 1.4600e0030.0000 4.5626 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 30 Date: 7/11/2022 9:25 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 836 of 2700 ends

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 8.0000e0056.0000e0058.5000e0040.0000 2.7000e0040.0000 2.8000e0047.0000e0050.0000 7.0000e0050.0000 0.2208 0.2208 1.0000e0051.0000e0050.2226 Total 8.0000e0056.0000e0058.5000e0040.0000 2.7000e0040.0000 2.8000e0047.0000e0050.0000 7.0000e0050.0000 0.2208 0.2208 1.0000e0051.0000e0050.2226 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 6.5600e0030.0000 6.5600e0033.1700e0030.0000 3.1700e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.3300e0030.0362 0.0218 5.0000e0051.5100e0031.5100e0031.3900e0031.3900e0030.0000 4.5260 4.5260 1.4600e0030.0000 4.5626 Total 3.3300e0030.0362 0.0218 5.0000e0056.5600e0031.5100e0038.0700e0033.1700e0031.3900e0034.5600e0030.0000 4.5260 4.5260 1.4600e0030.0000 4.5626 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 30 Date: 7/11/2022 9:25 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 837 of 2700 ends

3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1045 0.8311 0.8671 1.5300e0030.0374 0.0374 0.0359 0.0359 0.0000 126.6983 126.6983 0.0240 0.0000 127.2973 Total 0.1045 0.8311 0.8671 1.5300e0030.0374 0.0374 0.0359 0.0359 0.0000 126.6983 126.6983 0.0240 0.0000 127.2973 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 30 Date: 7/11/2022 9:25 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 838 of 2700 ends

3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 6.9000e0040.0246 9.2000e0031.1000e0043.8400e0031.2000e0043.9600e0031.1100e0031.1000e0041.2200e0030.0000 11.0912 11.0912 3.7000e0041.6000e00311.5761 Worker 4.8400e0033.8400e0030.0521 1.5000e0040.0167 1.0000e0040.0168 4.4400e0039.0000e0054.5300e0030.0000 13.4684 13.4684 3.5000e0043.5000e00413.5805 Total 5.5300e0030.0284 0.0613 2.6000e0040.0206 2.2000e0040.0208 5.5500e0032.0000e0045.7500e0030.0000 24.5596 24.5596 7.2000e0041.9500e00325.1566 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1045 0.8311 0.8671 1.5300e0030.0374 0.0374 0.0359 0.0359 0.0000 126.6981 126.6981 0.0240 0.0000 127.2971 Total 0.1045 0.8311 0.8671 1.5300e0030.0374 0.0374 0.0359 0.0359 0.0000 126.6981 126.6981 0.0240 0.0000 127.2971 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 30 Date: 7/11/2022 9:25 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 839 of 2700 ends

3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0591 0.4745 0.5217 9.3000e0040.0199 0.0199 0.0191 0.0191 0.0000 76.8542 76.8542 0.0143 0.0000 77.2120 Total 0.0591 0.4745 0.5217 9.3000e0040.0199 0.0199 0.0191 0.0191 0.0000 76.8542 76.8542 0.0143 0.0000 77.2120 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 30 Date: 7/11/2022 9:25 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 840 of 2700 ends

3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 4.0000e0040.0149 5.4600e0037.0000e0052.3300e0037.0000e0052.4000e0036.7000e0047.0000e0057.4000e0040.0000 6.6265 6.6265 2.3000e0049.5000e0046.9166 Worker 2.7400e0032.0800e0030.0294 9.0000e0050.0101 6.0000e0050.0102 2.6900e0036.0000e0052.7500e0030.0000 8.0015 8.0015 1.9000e0042.0000e0048.0646 Total 3.1400e0030.0170 0.0349 1.6000e0040.0125 1.3000e0040.0126 3.3600e0031.3000e0043.4900e0030.0000 14.6280 14.6280 4.2000e0041.1500e00314.9812 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0591 0.4745 0.5217 9.3000e0040.0199 0.0199 0.0191 0.0191 0.0000 76.8541 76.8541 0.0143 0.0000 77.2119 Total 0.0591 0.4745 0.5217 9.3000e0040.0199 0.0199 0.0191 0.0191 0.0000 76.8541 76.8541 0.0143 0.0000 77.2119 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 30 Date: 7/11/2022 9:25 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 841 of 2700 ends

Page 842 of 2700 ends

3.5 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.6000e0041.2000e0041.7500e0031.0000e0056.0000e0040.0000 6.1000e0041.6000e0040.0000 1.6000e0040.0000 0.4758 0.4758 1.0000e0051.0000e0050.4795 Total 1.6000e0041.2000e0041.7500e0031.0000e0056.0000e0040.0000 6.1000e0041.6000e0040.0000 1.6000e0040.0000 0.4758 0.4758 1.0000e0051.0000e0050.4795 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 0.1430 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.9900e0030.0134 0.0199 3.0000e0056.7000e0046.7000e0046.7000e0046.7000e0040.0000 2.8086 2.8086 1.6000e0040.0000 2.8125 Total 0.1450 0.0134 0.0199 3.0000e0056.7000e0046.7000e0046.7000e0046.7000e0040.0000 2.8086 2.8086 1.6000e0040.0000 2.8125 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 30 Date: 7/11/2022 9:25 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 843 of 2700 ends

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 30 Date: 7/11/2022 9:25 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 844 of 2700 ends

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.2405 0.2516 2.2675 4.6600e0030.4887 3.5000e0030.4922 0.1304 3.2500e0030.1336 0.0000 438.0334 438.0334 0.0324 0.0201 444.8223 Unmitigated 0.2405 0.2516 2.2675 4.6600e0030.4887 3.5000e0030.4922 0.1304 3.2500e0030.1336 0.0000 438.0334 438.0334 0.0324 0.0201 444.8223

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH City Park 0.542464 0.063735 0.188241 0.126899 0.023249 0.006239 0.010717 0.008079 0.000923 0.000604 0.024795 0.000702 0.003352 Hotel 0.542464 0.063735 0.188241 0.126899 0.023249 0.006239 0.010717 0.008079 0.000923 0.000604 0.024795 0.000702 0.003352 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 30 Date: 7/11/2022 9:25 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied i
»
......................................"•
; I
......................................■*
i i i i i i i i i i i
i i i i i i i i i i i
i i i i i i i i i i i

Page 845 of 2700 ends

Parking Lot 0.542464 0.063735 0.188241 0.126899 0.023249 0.006239 0.010717 0.008079 0.000923 0.000604 0.024795 0.000702 0.003352

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 39.8098 39.8098 3.3600e0034.1000e00440.0151 Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 40.5167 40.5167 3.4200e0034.1000e00440.7257 NaturalGas
Mitigated

3.8700e0030.0352 0.0296 2.1000e0042.6800e0032.6800e0032.6800e0032.6800e0030.0000 38.3235 38.3235 7.3000e0047.0000e00438.5513 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

3.8700e0030.0352 0.0296 2.1000e0042.6800e0032.6800e0032.6800e0032.6800e0030.0000 38.3235 38.3235 7.3000e0047.0000e00438.5513

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Install Energy Efficient Appliances
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 30 Date: 7/11/2022 9:25 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 846 of 2700 ends

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hotel 718156 3.8700e0030.0352 0.0296 2.1000e0042.6800e0032.6800e0032.6800e0032.6800e0030.0000 38.3235 38.3235 7.3000e0047.0000e00438.5513 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 3.8700e0030.0352 0.0296 2.1000e0042.6800e0032.6800e0032.6800e0032.6800e0030.0000 38.3235 38.3235 7.3000e0047.0000e00438.5513 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 30 Date: 7/11/2022 9:25 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 847 of 2700 ends

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hotel 718156 3.8700e0030.0352 0.0296 2.1000e0042.6800e0032.6800e0032.6800e0032.6800e0030.0000 38.3235 38.3235 7.3000e0047.0000e00438.5513 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 3.8700e0030.0352 0.0296 2.1000e0042.6800e0032.6800e0032.6800e0032.6800e0030.0000 38.3235 38.3235 7.3000e0047.0000e00438.5513 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 30 Date: 7/11/2022 9:25 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 848 of 2700 ends

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hotel 220762 39.1512 3.3000e0034.0000e00439.3531
Parking Lot 7700 1.3656 1.2000e0041.0000e0051.3726
Total 40.5167 3.4200e0034.1000e00440.7257
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 30 Date: 7/11/2022 9:25 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 849 of 2700 ends

Use Electric Lawnmower
Use Electric Leafblower
Use Electric Chainsaw

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hotel 216776 38.4442 3.2400e0033.9000e00438.6425
Parking Lot 7700 1.3656 1.2000e0041.0000e0051.3726
Total 39.8098 3.3600e0034.0000e00440.0151
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 30 Date: 7/11/2022 9:25 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 850 of 2700 ends

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.1250 1.0000e0059.1000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.6500e0031.6500e0030.0000 0.0000 1.7300e003 Unmitigated 0.1251 1.0000e0051.5700e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0050.0000 3.0600e0033.0600e0031.0000e0050.0000 3.2600e003

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.0143 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.1106 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 1.4000e0041.0000e0051.5700e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0050.0000 3.0600e0033.0600e0031.0000e0050.0000 3.2600e003 Total 0.1251 1.0000e0051.5700e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0050.0000 3.0600e0033.0600e0031.0000e0050.0000 3.2600e003 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 30 Date: 7/11/2022 9:25 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 851 of 2700 ends

Install Low Flow Bathroom Faucet
Install Low Flow Kitchen Faucet
Install Low Flow Toilet
Install Low Flow Shower
Use Water Efficient Irrigation System

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

0.0143 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.1106 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 6.0000e0051.0000e0059.1000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.6500e0031.6500e0030.0000 0.0000 1.7300e003 Total 0.1250 1.0000e0059.1000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.6500e0031.6500e0030.0000 0.0000 1.7300e003 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 30 Date: 7/11/2022 9:25 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 852 of 2700 ends

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 4.3097 0.0453 1.1000e0035.7702
Unmitigated 5.2603 0.0566 1.3800e0037.0853

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
City Park 0 /

0.178722

0.3521 3.0000e0050.0000 0.3540
Hotel 1.72494 /

0.19166

4.9081 0.0566 1.3700e0036.7313
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 5.2603 0.0566 1.3700e0037.0853
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 26 of 30 Date: 7/11/2022 9:25 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 853 of 2700 ends

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
City Park 0 /

0.16782

0.3307 3.0000e0050.0000 0.3324
Hotel 1.37995 /

0.179969

3.9790 0.0453 1.1000e0035.4378
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 4.3097 0.0453 1.1000e0035.7702
Mitigated

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
Institute Recycling and Composting Services

8.0 Waste Detail
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 27 of 30 Date: 7/11/2022 9:25 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 854 of 2700 ends

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 1.8899 0.1117 0.0000 4.6820
Unmitigated 7.5594 0.4468 0.0000 18.7281
Category/Year

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
City Park 0.01 2.0300e0031.2000e0040.0000 5.0300e003 Hotel 37.23 7.5574 0.4466 0.0000 18.7230
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 7.5594 0.4468 0.0000 18.7281
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 28 of 30 Date: 7/11/2022 9:25 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 855 of 2700 ends

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
City Park 0.0025 5.1000e0043.0000e0050.0000 1.2600e003 Hotel 9.3075 1.8893 0.1117 0.0000 4.6808
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 1.8899 0.1117 0.0000 4.6820
Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 29 of 30 Date: 7/11/2022 9:25 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 856 of 2700 ends

11.0 Vegetation
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 30 of 30 Date: 7/11/2022 9:25 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 857 of 2700 ends

Avid Hotel
Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - per PD
Construction Phase - per AQ Questionnaire
Demolition - Per CalEEMod user's guide and AQ construction questionnaire Grading -
Vehicle Trips - Per Traffic Memo
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - SCAQMD RULE 403 Energy Mitigation - per AQ Operational Questionnaire
Water Mitigation - per AQ Operational questionnaire
Waste Mitigation - AB341

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Parking Lot 55.00 Space 0.49 22,000.00 0
City Park 0.15 Acre 0.15 6,438.17 0
Hotel 68.00 Room 2.27 30,200.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
9 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 33

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Southern California Edison
Operational Year 2024
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
390.98 CH4 Intensity 0.033
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.004
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:24 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 858 of 2700 ends

Mobile Land Use Mitigation -
Mobile Commute Mitigation -
Area Mitigation - Per AQ operational questionnaire

2.0 Emissions Summary
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 22.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 220.00 196.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 5.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 6.00 5.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 6,534.00 6,438.17
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 98,736.00 30,200.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 1.96 0.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.19 8.08
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 2.19 0.00
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.95 8.08
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 0.78 0.00
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 8.36 7.99
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:24 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied !
:
-+'
!
:
!
:
-+'
!
:
!
:
-+'
!
:
!
:
-+'
!
:
!
:
-+'
!
:
-4 ■

Page 859 of 2700 ends

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2023 3.1702 31.3950 24.3352 0.0585 11.9069 1.2987 13.2056 4.2266 1.2056 5.4322 0.0000 5,812.525 3 5,812.525
3 1.3099 0.2053 5,906.462
6 2024 14.8819 14.4867 17.0677 0.0327 0.3994 0.6029 1.0023 0.1074 0.5798 0.6872 0.0000 3,065.898 5 3,065.898
5 0.4559 0.0348 3,087.675
2 Maximum 14.8819 31.3950 24.3352 0.0585 11.9069 1.2987 13.2056 4.2266 1.2056 5.4322 0.0000 5,812.525 3 5,812.525
3 1.3099 0.2053 5,906.462
6 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2023 3.1702 31.3950 24.3352 0.0585 4.7893 1.2987 6.0880 1.6681 1.2056 2.8737 0.0000 5,812.525 3 5,812.525
3 1.3099 0.2053 5,906.462
6 2024 14.8819 14.4867 17.0677 0.0327 0.3994 0.6029 1.0023 0.1074 0.5798 0.6872 0.0000 3,065.898 5 3,065.898
5 0.4559 0.0348 3,087.675
2 Maximum 14.8819 31.3950 24.3352 0.0585 4.7893 1.2987 6.0880 1.6681 1.2056 2.8737 0.0000 5,812.525 3 5,812.525
3 1.3099 0.2053 5,906.462
6 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:24 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 860 of 2700 ends

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 57.84 0.00 50.10 59.03 0.00 41.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:24 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 861 of 2700 ends

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 0.6856 1.1000e0040.0126 0.0000 4.0000e0054.0000e0054.0000e0054.0000e0050.0270 0.0270 7.0000e0050.0287 Energy 0.0212 0.1929 0.1620 1.1600e0030.0147 0.0147 0.0147 0.0147 231.4766 231.4766 4.4400e0034.2400e003232.8521 Mobile 1.3903 1.2755 12.6031 0.0266 2.7602 0.0194 2.7797 0.7352 0.0180 0.7533 2,762.448 7 2,762.448
7 0.1921 0.1167 2,802.020
7 Total 2.0971 1.4685 12.7776 0.0278 2.7602 0.0341 2.7944 0.7352 0.0327 0.7680 2,993.952 2 2,993.952
2 0.1966 0.1209 3,034.901
5 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 0.6850 6.0000e0057.2800e0030.0000 2.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0050.0145 0.0145 3.0000e0050.0153 Energy 0.0212 0.1929 0.1620 1.1600e0030.0147 0.0147 0.0147 0.0147 231.4766 231.4766 4.4400e0034.2400e003232.8521 Mobile 1.3903 1.2755 12.6031 0.0266 2.7602 0.0194 2.7797 0.7352 0.0180 0.7533 2,762.448 7 2,762.448
7 0.1921 0.1167 2,802.020
7 Total 2.0965 1.4685 12.7724 0.0278 2.7602 0.0341 2.7944 0.7352 0.0327 0.7680 2,993.939 8 2,993.939
8 0.1966 0.1209 3,034.888
0 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:24 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 862 of 2700 ends

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 7/3/2023 7/7/2023 5 5
2 Grading Grading 7/7/2023 7/13/2023 5 5
3 Building Construction Building Construction 7/13/2023 4/11/2024 5 196 4 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 4/11/2024 5/10/2024 5 22 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 7.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 8.00 231 0.29
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.03 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 45,300; Non-Residential Outdoor: 15,100; Striped Parking Area: 1,320 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 5
Acres of Paving: 0.49
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:24 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 863 of 2700 ends

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Replace Ground Cover
Water Exposed Area
Building Construction Forklifts 2 7.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 3 8.00 46 0.45
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 5 13.00 0.00 98.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 4 10.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 8 25.00 10.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 5.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:24 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 864 of 2700 ends

3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 4.2242 0.0000 4.2242 0.6396 0.0000 0.6396 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.4725 14.3184 13.4577 0.0241 0.6766 0.6766 0.6328 0.6328 2,324.395 9 2,324.395
9 0.5893 2,339.127
8 Total 1.4725 14.3184 13.4577 0.0241 4.2242 0.6766 4.9008 0.6396 0.6328 1.2724 2,324.395 9 2,324.395
9 0.5893 2,339.127
8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0425 2.5576 0.6826 0.0115 0.3431 0.0161 0.3592 0.0941 0.0154 0.1095 1,259.613 8 1,259.613
8 0.0694 0.2000 1,320.956
7 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0416 0.0290 0.4711 1.2900e0030.1453 8.8000e0040.1462 0.0385 8.1000e0040.0393 131.6397 131.6397 3.2800e0033.0000e003132.6157 Total 0.0841 2.5866 1.1537 0.0128 0.4884 0.0170 0.5054 0.1326 0.0162 0.1488 1,391.253 5 1,391.253
5 0.0727 0.2030 1,453.572
4 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:24 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 865 of 2700 ends

3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 1.5651 0.0000 1.5651 0.2370 0.0000 0.2370 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.4725 14.3184 13.4577 0.0241 0.6766 0.6766 0.6328 0.6328 0.0000 2,324.395 9 2,324.395
9 0.5893 2,339.127
8 Total 1.4725 14.3184 13.4577 0.0241 1.5651 0.6766 2.2417 0.2370 0.6328 0.8697 0.0000 2,324.395 9 2,324.395
9 0.5893 2,339.127
8 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0425 2.5576 0.6826 0.0115 0.3431 0.0161 0.3592 0.0941 0.0154 0.1095 1,259.613 8 1,259.613
8 0.0694 0.2000 1,320.956
7 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0416 0.0290 0.4711 1.2900e0030.1453 8.8000e0040.1462 0.0385 8.1000e0040.0393 131.6397 131.6397 3.2800e0033.0000e003132.6157 Total 0.0841 2.5866 1.1537 0.0128 0.4884 0.0170 0.5054 0.1326 0.0162 0.1488 1,391.253 5 1,391.253
5 0.0727 0.2030 1,453.572
4 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:24 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 866 of 2700 ends

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 7.0826 0.0000 7.0826 3.4247 0.0000 3.4247 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.3330 14.4676 8.7038 0.0206 0.6044 0.6044 0.5560 0.5560 1,995.614 7 1,995.614
7 0.6454 2,011.750
3 Total 1.3330 14.4676 8.7038 0.0206 7.0826 0.6044 7.6869 3.4247 0.5560 3.9807 1,995.614 7 1,995.614
7 0.6454 2,011.750
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0320 0.0223 0.3624 9.9000e0040.1118 6.7000e0040.1125 0.0296 6.2000e0040.0303 101.2613 101.2613 2.5200e0032.3100e003102.0121 Total 0.0320 0.0223 0.3624 9.9000e0040.1118 6.7000e0040.1125 0.0296 6.2000e0040.0303 101.2613 101.2613 2.5200e0032.3100e003102.0121 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:24 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 867 of 2700 ends

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 2.6241 0.0000 2.6241 1.2689 0.0000 1.2689 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.3330 14.4676 8.7038 0.0206 0.6044 0.6044 0.5560 0.5560 0.0000 1,995.614 7 1,995.614
7 0.6454 2,011.750
3 Total 1.3330 14.4676 8.7038 0.0206 2.6241 0.6044 3.2285 1.2689 0.5560 1.8249 0.0000 1,995.614 7 1,995.614
7 0.6454 2,011.750
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0320 0.0223 0.3624 9.9000e0040.1118 6.7000e0040.1125 0.0296 6.2000e0040.0303 101.2613 101.2613 2.5200e0032.3100e003102.0121 Total 0.0320 0.0223 0.3624 9.9000e0040.1118 6.7000e0040.1125 0.0296 6.2000e0040.0303 101.2613 101.2613 2.5200e0032.3100e003102.0121 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:24 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 868 of 2700 ends

3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7136 13.6239 14.2145 0.0250 0.6136 0.6136 0.5880 0.5880 2,289.523 3 2,289.523
3 0.4330 2,300.347
9 Total 1.7136 13.6239 14.2145 0.0250 0.6136 0.6136 0.5880 0.5880 2,289.523 3 2,289.523
3 0.4330 2,300.347
9 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0115 0.3838 0.1487 1.8600e0030.0641 1.9300e0030.0660 0.0184 1.8500e0030.0203 200.2825 200.2825 6.7100e0030.0288 209.0311 Worker 0.0801 0.0558 0.9059 2.4700e0030.2794 1.6900e0030.2811 0.0741 1.5500e0030.0757 253.1532 253.1532 6.3000e0035.7700e003255.0302 Total 0.0916 0.4396 1.0546 4.3300e0030.3435 3.6200e0030.3471 0.0926 3.4000e0030.0960 453.4357 453.4357 0.0130 0.0346 464.0613 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:24 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 869 of 2700 ends

3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7136 13.6239 14.2145 0.0250 0.6136 0.6136 0.5880 0.5880 0.0000 2,289.523 3 2,289.523
3 0.4330 2,300.347
9 Total 1.7136 13.6239 14.2145 0.0250 0.6136 0.6136 0.5880 0.5880 0.0000 2,289.523 3 2,289.523
3 0.4330 2,300.347
9 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0115 0.3838 0.1487 1.8600e0030.0641 1.9300e0030.0660 0.0184 1.8500e0030.0203 200.2825 200.2825 6.7100e0030.0288 209.0311 Worker 0.0801 0.0558 0.9059 2.4700e0030.2794 1.6900e0030.2811 0.0741 1.5500e0030.0757 253.1532 253.1532 6.3000e0035.7700e003255.0302 Total 0.0916 0.4396 1.0546 4.3300e0030.3435 3.6200e0030.3471 0.0926 3.4000e0030.0960 453.4357 453.4357 0.0130 0.0346 464.0613 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:24 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 870 of 2700 ends

3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5971 12.8235 14.1002 0.0250 0.5381 0.5381 0.5153 0.5153 2,289.654 1 2,289.654
1 0.4265 2,300.315
4 Total 1.5971 12.8235 14.1002 0.0250 0.5381 0.5381 0.5153 0.5153 2,289.654 1 2,289.654
1 0.4265 2,300.315
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0112 0.3846 0.1455 1.8300e0030.0641 1.9400e0030.0660 0.0184 1.8600e0030.0203 197.2746 197.2746 6.7400e0030.0284 205.9040 Worker 0.0746 0.0498 0.8433 2.4000e0030.2794 1.6200e0030.2811 0.0741 1.4900e0030.0756 247.9347 247.9347 5.7000e0035.3700e003249.6763 Total 0.0858 0.4345 0.9888 4.2300e0030.3435 3.5600e0030.3471 0.0926 3.3500e0030.0959 445.2094 445.2094 0.0124 0.0338 455.5803 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:24 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 871 of 2700 ends

3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5971 12.8235 14.1002 0.0250 0.5381 0.5381 0.5153 0.5153 0.0000 2,289.654 1 2,289.654
1 0.4265 2,300.315
4 Total 1.5971 12.8235 14.1002 0.0250 0.5381 0.5381 0.5153 0.5153 0.0000 2,289.654 1 2,289.654
1 0.4265 2,300.315
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0112 0.3846 0.1455 1.8300e0030.0641 1.9400e0030.0660 0.0184 1.8600e0030.0203 197.2746 197.2746 6.7400e0030.0284 205.9040 Worker 0.0746 0.0498 0.8433 2.4000e0030.2794 1.6200e0030.2811 0.0741 1.4900e0030.0756 247.9347 247.9347 5.7000e0035.3700e003249.6763 Total 0.0858 0.4345 0.9888 4.2300e0030.3435 3.5600e0030.3471 0.0926 3.3500e0030.0959 445.2094 445.2094 0.0124 0.0338 455.5803 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:24 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 872 of 2700 ends

3.5 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 13.0033 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 13.1840 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0149 9.9700e0030.1687 4.8000e0040.0559 3.2000e0040.0562 0.0148 3.0000e0040.0151 49.5870 49.5870 1.1400e0031.0700e00349.9353 Total 0.0149 9.9700e0030.1687 4.8000e0040.0559 3.2000e0040.0562 0.0148 3.0000e0040.0151 49.5870 49.5870 1.1400e0031.0700e00349.9353 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:24 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 873 of 2700 ends

3.5 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 13.0033 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 13.1840 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0149 9.9700e0030.1687 4.8000e0040.0559 3.2000e0040.0562 0.0148 3.0000e0040.0151 49.5870 49.5870 1.1400e0031.0700e00349.9353 Total 0.0149 9.9700e0030.1687 4.8000e0040.0559 3.2000e0040.0562 0.0148 3.0000e0040.0151 49.5870 49.5870 1.1400e0031.0700e00349.9353 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:24 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 874 of 2700 ends

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 1.3903 1.2755 12.6031 0.0266 2.7602 0.0194 2.7797 0.7352 0.0180 0.7533 2,762.448 7 2,762.448
7 0.1921 0.1167 2,802.020
7 Unmitigated 1.3903 1.2755 12.6031 0.0266 2.7602 0.0194 2.7797 0.7352 0.0180 0.7533 2,762.448 7 2,762.448
7 0.1921 0.1167 2,802.020
7 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hotel 543.32 549.44 549.44 1,300,627 1,300,627
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 543.32 549.44 549.44 1,300,627 1,300,627
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by City Park 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 66 28 6
Hotel 16.60 8.40 6.90 19.40 61.60 19.00 58 38 4
Parking Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:24 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1 ..............................................."»
..............................................."■
1

Page 875 of 2700 ends

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0212 0.1929 0.1620 1.1600e0030.0147 0.0147 0.0147 0.0147 231.4766 231.4766 4.4400e0034.2400e003232.8521 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.0212 0.1929 0.1620 1.1600e0030.0147 0.0147 0.0147 0.0147 231.4766 231.4766 4.4400e0034.2400e003232.8521

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Install Energy Efficient Appliances
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:24 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 11111 11 1 1 11 1 1 111 1 1 1111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Page 876 of 2700 ends

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hotel 1967.55 0.0212 0.1929 0.1620 1.1600e0030.0147 0.0147 0.0147 0.0147 231.4766 231.4766 4.4400e0034.2400e003232.8521 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0212 0.1929 0.1620 1.1600e0030.0147 0.0147 0.0147 0.0147 231.4766 231.4766 4.4400e0034.2400e003232.8521 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:24 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 877 of 2700 ends

Use Electric Lawnmower
Use Electric Leafblower
Use Electric Chainsaw

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hotel 1.96755 0.0212 0.1929 0.1620 1.1600e0030.0147 0.0147 0.0147 0.0147 231.4766 231.4766 4.4400e0034.2400e003232.8521 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0212 0.1929 0.1620 1.1600e0030.0147 0.0147 0.0147 0.0147 231.4766 231.4766 4.4400e0034.2400e003232.8521 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:24 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 878 of 2700 ends

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 0.6850 6.0000e0057.2800e0030.0000 2.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0050.0145 0.0145 3.0000e0050.0153 Unmitigated 0.6856 1.1000e0040.0126 0.0000 4.0000e0054.0000e0054.0000e0054.0000e0050.0270 0.0270 7.0000e0050.0287

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating

0.0784 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

0.6061 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 1.1600e0031.1000e0040.0126 0.0000 4.0000e0054.0000e0054.0000e0054.0000e0050.0270 0.0270 7.0000e0050.0287 Total 0.6856 1.1000e0040.0126 0.0000 4.0000e0054.0000e0054.0000e0054.0000e0050.0270 0.0270 7.0000e0050.0287 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:24 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 879 of 2700 ends

Install Low Flow Bathroom Faucet
Install Low Flow Kitchen Faucet
Install Low Flow Toilet
Install Low Flow Shower
Use Water Efficient Irrigation System

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

0.0784 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

0.6061 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 4.9000e0046.0000e0057.2800e0030.0000 2.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0050.0145 0.0145 3.0000e0050.0153 Total 0.6850 6.0000e0057.2800e0030.0000 2.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0050.0145 0.0145 3.0000e0050.0153 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:24 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 880 of 2700 ends

11.0 Vegetation

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
Institute Recycling and Composting Services

8.0 Waste Detail

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:24 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 881 of 2700 ends

Avid Hotel
Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - per PD
Construction Phase - per AQ Questionnaire
Demolition - Per CalEEMod user's guide and AQ construction questionnaire Grading -
Vehicle Trips - Per Traffic Memo
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - SCAQMD RULE 403 Energy Mitigation - per AQ Operational Questionnaire
Water Mitigation - per AQ Operational questionnaire
Waste Mitigation - AB341

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Parking Lot 55.00 Space 0.49 22,000.00 0
City Park 0.15 Acre 0.15 6,438.17 0
Hotel 68.00 Room 2.27 30,200.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
9 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 33

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Southern California Edison
Operational Year 2024
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
390.98 CH4 Intensity 0.033
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.004
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:22 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 882 of 2700 ends

Mobile Land Use Mitigation -
Mobile Commute Mitigation -
Area Mitigation - Per AQ operational questionnaire

2.0 Emissions Summary
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 22.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 220.00 196.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 5.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 6.00 5.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 6,534.00 6,438.17
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 98,736.00 30,200.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 1.96 0.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.19 8.08
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 2.19 0.00
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.95 8.08
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 0.78 0.00
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 8.36 7.99
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:22 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied !
:
-+'
!
:
!
:
-+'
!
:
!
:
-+'
!
:
!
:
-+'
!
:
!
:
-+'
!
:
-4 ■

Page 883 of 2700 ends

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2023 3.1782 31.5131 24.2374 0.0584 11.9069 1.2987 13.2056 4.2266 1.2057 5.4322 0.0000 5,801.574 3 5,801.574
3 1.3099 0.2059 5,895.682
0 2024 14.8884 14.5110 16.9914 0.0326 0.3994 0.6029 1.0023 0.1074 0.5798 0.6872 0.0000 3,050.578 4 3,050.578
4 0.4560 0.0354 3,072.509
3 Maximum 14.8884 31.5131 24.2374 0.0584 11.9069 1.2987 13.2056 4.2266 1.2057 5.4322 0.0000 5,801.574 3 5,801.574
3 1.3099 0.2059 5,895.682
0 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2023 3.1782 31.5131 24.2374 0.0584 4.7893 1.2987 6.0880 1.6681 1.2057 2.8737 0.0000 5,801.574 3 5,801.574
3 1.3099 0.2059 5,895.682
0 2024 14.8884 14.5110 16.9914 0.0326 0.3994 0.6029 1.0023 0.1074 0.5798 0.6872 0.0000 3,050.578 4 3,050.578
4 0.4560 0.0354 3,072.509
3 Maximum 14.8884 31.5131 24.2374 0.0584 4.7893 1.2987 6.0880 1.6681 1.2057 2.8737 0.0000 5,801.574 3 5,801.574
3 1.3099 0.2059 5,895.682
0 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:22 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 884 of 2700 ends

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 57.84 0.00 50.10 59.03 0.00 41.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:22 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 885 of 2700 ends

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 0.6856 1.1000e0040.0126 0.0000 4.0000e0054.0000e0054.0000e0054.0000e0050.0270 0.0270 7.0000e0050.0287 Energy 0.0212 0.1929 0.1620 1.1600e0030.0147 0.0147 0.0147 0.0147 231.4766 231.4766 4.4400e0034.2400e003232.8521 Mobile 1.3590 1.3776 12.4795 0.0255 2.7602 0.0194 2.7797 0.7352 0.0180 0.7533 2,646.381 4 2,646.381
4 0.1992 0.1220 2,687.709
8 Total 2.0658 1.5706 12.6541 0.0267 2.7602 0.0341 2.7944 0.7352 0.0327 0.7680 2,877.884 9 2,877.884
9 0.2038 0.1262 2,920.590
6 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 0.6850 6.0000e0057.2800e0030.0000 2.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0050.0145 0.0145 3.0000e0050.0153 Energy 0.0212 0.1929 0.1620 1.1600e0030.0147 0.0147 0.0147 0.0147 231.4766 231.4766 4.4400e0034.2400e003232.8521 Mobile 1.3590 1.3776 12.4795 0.0255 2.7602 0.0194 2.7797 0.7352 0.0180 0.7533 2,646.381 4 2,646.381
4 0.1992 0.1220 2,687.709
8 Total 2.0652 1.5706 12.6488 0.0267 2.7602 0.0341 2.7944 0.7352 0.0327 0.7680 2,877.872 5 2,877.872
5 0.2037 0.1262 2,920.577
1 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:22 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 886 of 2700 ends

0.03 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 45,300; Non-Residential Outdoor: 15,100; Striped Parking Area: 1,320 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 5
Acres of Paving: 0.49
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:22 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 887 of 2700 ends

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Replace Ground Cover
Water Exposed Area
Building Construction Forklifts 2 7.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 3 8.00 46 0.45
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 5 13.00 0.00 98.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 4 10.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 8 25.00 10.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 5.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:22 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 888 of 2700 ends

3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 4.2242 0.0000 4.2242 0.6396 0.0000 0.6396 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.4725 14.3184 13.4577 0.0241 0.6766 0.6766 0.6328 0.6328 2,324.395 9 2,324.395
9 0.5893 2,339.127
8 Total 1.4725 14.3184 13.4577 0.0241 4.2242 0.6766 4.9008 0.6396 0.6328 1.2724 2,324.395 9 2,324.395
9 0.5893 2,339.127
8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0398 2.6704 0.6920 0.0115 0.3431 0.0162 0.3593 0.0941 0.0155 0.1095 1,260.941 5 1,260.941
5 0.0693 0.2002 1,322.345
1 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0447 0.0321 0.4330 1.2200e0030.1453 8.8000e0040.1462 0.0385 8.1000e0040.0393 124.6995 124.6995 3.3200e0033.2000e003125.7376 Total 0.0845 2.7024 1.1250 0.0127 0.4884 0.0171 0.5055 0.1326 0.0163 0.1489 1,385.641 0 1,385.641
0 0.0726 0.2034 1,448.082
7 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:22 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 889 of 2700 ends

3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 1.5651 0.0000 1.5651 0.2370 0.0000 0.2370 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.4725 14.3184 13.4577 0.0241 0.6766 0.6766 0.6328 0.6328 0.0000 2,324.395 9 2,324.395
9 0.5893 2,339.127
8 Total 1.4725 14.3184 13.4577 0.0241 1.5651 0.6766 2.2417 0.2370 0.6328 0.8697 0.0000 2,324.395 9 2,324.395
9 0.5893 2,339.127
8 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0398 2.6704 0.6920 0.0115 0.3431 0.0162 0.3593 0.0941 0.0155 0.1095 1,260.941 5 1,260.941
5 0.0693 0.2002 1,322.345
1 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0447 0.0321 0.4330 1.2200e0030.1453 8.8000e0040.1462 0.0385 8.1000e0040.0393 124.6995 124.6995 3.3200e0033.2000e003125.7376 Total 0.0845 2.7024 1.1250 0.0127 0.4884 0.0171 0.5055 0.1326 0.0163 0.1489 1,385.641 0 1,385.641
0 0.0726 0.2034 1,448.082
7 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:22 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 890 of 2700 ends

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 7.0826 0.0000 7.0826 3.4247 0.0000 3.4247 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.3330 14.4676 8.7038 0.0206 0.6044 0.6044 0.5560 0.5560 1,995.614 7 1,995.614
7 0.6454 2,011.750
3 Total 1.3330 14.4676 8.7038 0.0206 7.0826 0.6044 7.6869 3.4247 0.5560 3.9807 1,995.614 7 1,995.614
7 0.6454 2,011.750
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0344 0.0247 0.3331 9.4000e0040.1118 6.7000e0040.1125 0.0296 6.2000e0040.0303 95.9227 95.9227 2.5600e0032.4700e00396.7212 Total 0.0344 0.0247 0.3331 9.4000e0040.1118 6.7000e0040.1125 0.0296 6.2000e0040.0303 95.9227 95.9227 2.5600e0032.4700e00396.7212 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:22 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 891 of 2700 ends

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 2.6241 0.0000 2.6241 1.2689 0.0000 1.2689 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.3330 14.4676 8.7038 0.0206 0.6044 0.6044 0.5560 0.5560 0.0000 1,995.614 7 1,995.614
7 0.6454 2,011.750
3 Total 1.3330 14.4676 8.7038 0.0206 2.6241 0.6044 3.2285 1.2689 0.5560 1.8249 0.0000 1,995.614 7 1,995.614
7 0.6454 2,011.750
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0344 0.0247 0.3331 9.4000e0040.1118 6.7000e0040.1125 0.0296 6.2000e0040.0303 95.9227 95.9227 2.5600e0032.4700e00396.7212 Total 0.0344 0.0247 0.3331 9.4000e0040.1118 6.7000e0040.1125 0.0296 6.2000e0040.0303 95.9227 95.9227 2.5600e0032.4700e00396.7212 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:22 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 892 of 2700 ends

3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7136 13.6239 14.2145 0.0250 0.6136 0.6136 0.5880 0.5880 2,289.523 3 2,289.523
3 0.4330 2,300.347
9 Total 1.7136 13.6239 14.2145 0.0250 0.6136 0.6136 0.5880 0.5880 2,289.523 3 2,289.523
3 0.4330 2,300.347
9 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0111 0.4019 0.1534 1.8600e0030.0641 1.9400e0030.0660 0.0184 1.8600e0030.0203 200.6203 200.6203 6.6800e0030.0289 209.3911 Worker 0.0860 0.0617 0.8327 2.3400e0030.2794 1.6900e0030.2811 0.0741 1.5500e0030.0757 239.8067 239.8067 6.3900e0036.1600e003241.8030 Total 0.0971 0.4635 0.9861 4.2000e0030.3435 3.6300e0030.3471 0.0926 3.4100e0030.0960 440.4270 440.4270 0.0131 0.0350 451.1941 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:22 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 893 of 2700 ends

3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7136 13.6239 14.2145 0.0250 0.6136 0.6136 0.5880 0.5880 0.0000 2,289.523 3 2,289.523
3 0.4330 2,300.347
9 Total 1.7136 13.6239 14.2145 0.0250 0.6136 0.6136 0.5880 0.5880 0.0000 2,289.523 3 2,289.523
3 0.4330 2,300.347
9 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0111 0.4019 0.1534 1.8600e0030.0641 1.9400e0030.0660 0.0184 1.8600e0030.0203 200.6203 200.6203 6.6800e0030.0289 209.3911 Worker 0.0860 0.0617 0.8327 2.3400e0030.2794 1.6900e0030.2811 0.0741 1.5500e0030.0757 239.8067 239.8067 6.3900e0036.1600e003241.8030 Total 0.0971 0.4635 0.9861 4.2000e0030.3435 3.6300e0030.3471 0.0926 3.4100e0030.0960 440.4270 440.4270 0.0131 0.0350 451.1941 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:22 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 894 of 2700 ends

3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5971 12.8235 14.1002 0.0250 0.5381 0.5381 0.5153 0.5153 2,289.654 1 2,289.654
1 0.4265 2,300.315
4 Total 1.5971 12.8235 14.1002 0.0250 0.5381 0.5381 0.5153 0.5153 2,289.654 1 2,289.654
1 0.4265 2,300.315
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0108 0.4027 0.1502 1.8300e0030.0641 1.9500e0030.0660 0.0184 1.8700e0030.0203 197.6143 197.6143 6.7100e0030.0285 206.2652 Worker 0.0804 0.0550 0.7758 2.2800e0030.2794 1.6200e0030.2811 0.0741 1.4900e0030.0756 234.8850 234.8850 5.7900e0035.7300e003236.7370 Total 0.0912 0.4577 0.9259 4.1100e0030.3435 3.5700e0030.3471 0.0926 3.3600e0030.0959 432.4993 432.4993 0.0125 0.0342 443.0023 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:22 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 895 of 2700 ends

3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5971 12.8235 14.1002 0.0250 0.5381 0.5381 0.5153 0.5153 0.0000 2,289.654 1 2,289.654
1 0.4265 2,300.315
4 Total 1.5971 12.8235 14.1002 0.0250 0.5381 0.5381 0.5153 0.5153 0.0000 2,289.654 1 2,289.654
1 0.4265 2,300.315
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0108 0.4027 0.1502 1.8300e0030.0641 1.9500e0030.0660 0.0184 1.8700e0030.0203 197.6143 197.6143 6.7100e0030.0285 206.2652 Worker 0.0804 0.0550 0.7758 2.2800e0030.2794 1.6200e0030.2811 0.0741 1.4900e0030.0756 234.8850 234.8850 5.7900e0035.7300e003236.7370 Total 0.0912 0.4577 0.9259 4.1100e0030.3435 3.5700e0030.3471 0.0926 3.3600e0030.0959 432.4993 432.4993 0.0125 0.0342 443.0023 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:22 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 896 of 2700 ends

3.5 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 13.0033 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 13.1840 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0161 0.0110 0.1552 4.6000e0040.0559 3.2000e0040.0562 0.0148 3.0000e0040.0151 46.9770 46.9770 1.1600e0031.1500e00347.3474 Total 0.0161 0.0110 0.1552 4.6000e0040.0559 3.2000e0040.0562 0.0148 3.0000e0040.0151 46.9770 46.9770 1.1600e0031.1500e00347.3474 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:22 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 897 of 2700 ends

3.5 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 13.0033 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 13.1840 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0161 0.0110 0.1552 4.6000e0040.0559 3.2000e0040.0562 0.0148 3.0000e0040.0151 46.9770 46.9770 1.1600e0031.1500e00347.3474 Total 0.0161 0.0110 0.1552 4.6000e0040.0559 3.2000e0040.0562 0.0148 3.0000e0040.0151 46.9770 46.9770 1.1600e0031.1500e00347.3474 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:22 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 898 of 2700 ends

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 1.3590 1.3776 12.4795 0.0255 2.7602 0.0194 2.7797 0.7352 0.0180 0.7533 2,646.381 4 2,646.381
4 0.1992 0.1220 2,687.709
8 Unmitigated 1.3590 1.3776 12.4795 0.0255 2.7602 0.0194 2.7797 0.7352 0.0180 0.7533 2,646.381 4 2,646.381
4 0.1992 0.1220 2,687.709
8 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hotel 543.32 549.44 549.44 1,300,627 1,300,627
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 543.32 549.44 549.44 1,300,627 1,300,627
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by City Park 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 66 28 6
Hotel 16.60 8.40 6.90 19.40 61.60 19.00 58 38 4
Parking Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:22 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1 ..............................................."»
..............................................."■
1

Page 899 of 2700 ends

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0212 0.1929 0.1620 1.1600e0030.0147 0.0147 0.0147 0.0147 231.4766 231.4766 4.4400e0034.2400e003232.8521 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.0212 0.1929 0.1620 1.1600e0030.0147 0.0147 0.0147 0.0147 231.4766 231.4766 4.4400e0034.2400e003232.8521

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Install Energy Efficient Appliances
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:22 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Page 900 of 2700 ends

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hotel 1967.55 0.0212 0.1929 0.1620 1.1600e0030.0147 0.0147 0.0147 0.0147 231.4766 231.4766 4.4400e0034.2400e003232.8521 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0212 0.1929 0.1620 1.1600e0030.0147 0.0147 0.0147 0.0147 231.4766 231.4766 4.4400e0034.2400e003232.8521 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:22 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 901 of 2700 ends

Use Electric Lawnmower
Use Electric Leafblower
Use Electric Chainsaw

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hotel 1.96755 0.0212 0.1929 0.1620 1.1600e0030.0147 0.0147 0.0147 0.0147 231.4766 231.4766 4.4400e0034.2400e003232.8521 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0212 0.1929 0.1620 1.1600e0030.0147 0.0147 0.0147 0.0147 231.4766 231.4766 4.4400e0034.2400e003232.8521 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:22 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 902 of 2700 ends

0.0784 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

0.6061 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 1.1600e0031.1000e0040.0126 0.0000 4.0000e0054.0000e0054.0000e0054.0000e0050.0270 0.0270 7.0000e0050.0287 Total 0.6856 1.1000e0040.0126 0.0000 4.0000e0054.0000e0054.0000e0054.0000e0050.0270 0.0270 7.0000e0050.0287 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:22 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 903 of 2700 ends

Install Low Flow Bathroom Faucet
Install Low Flow Kitchen Faucet
Install Low Flow Toilet
Install Low Flow Shower
Use Water Efficient Irrigation System

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

0.0784 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

0.6061 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 4.9000e0046.0000e0057.2800e0030.0000 2.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0050.0145 0.0145 3.0000e0050.0153 Total 0.6850 6.0000e0057.2800e0030.0000 2.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0050.0145 0.0145 3.0000e0050.0153 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:22 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 904 of 2700 ends

11.0 Vegetation

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
Institute Recycling and Composting Services

8.0 Waste Detail

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 24 Date: 7/11/2022 9:22 AM Avid Hotel - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 905 of 2700 ends

Avid Hotel Project
Energy Calculations
(kBTU/yr) (Therms) (kWh/yr) (MWh/yr)
City Park 0 0 0 0
Hotel 718,156 7,182 216,776 217
Parking Lot 0 0 7,700 8
Totals 718,156 7,182 224,476 224
1 kBTU = 0.01 therms
Electricity (MWh) 224 65,649,878 0.0003%
Natural Gas (Therms) 7,182 2,936,687,098 0.0002%
Source: Refer to CalEEMod outputs for assumptions used in this analysis.

Energy Type
Riverside County
Energy
Consumption (2020)
Project Annual
Energy
Consumption
Operational Elelctritcy and Naural Gas Consumption
Land Use Natural Gas Use Electricity Use
Percentage Increase
Countywide

Page 906 of 2700 ends

Avid Hotel Project
Energy Calculations
Vehicle Type Percent of Vehicle Trips1 Daily Trips2 Annual Vehicle Miles Traveled Average Fuel
Economy (miles per
gallon)3
Total Annual Fuel
Consumption
(gallons)4
Passenger Cars 0.54 298 705,543 22 32,070
Light/Medium Trucks 0.38 208 492,775 17.3 28,484
Heavy Trucks/Other 0.08 43 102,229 6.4 15,973
TOTAL 6 1.00 549 1,300,627 -- 76,528
County On-Road (Gallons) 3,845,945,898

5. Values may be slightly off due to rounding.

Source: Refer to CalEEMod outputs for assumptions used in this analysis.

Notes:

1. Percent of Vehicle Trip distribution based on trip characteristics within the CalEEMod model.

2. Daily Trips Distribution based on ITE manual.

3. Average fuel economy derived from the Department of Transportation.

4. Total Daily Fuel Consumption calculated by dividing the daily VMT by the average fuel economy (i.e., VMT/Average Fuel Economy).

Page 907 of 2700 ends

Avid Hotel Project
Energy Calculations
Phase Phase Length
(# days) # Worker Trips Worker Trip Length Total VMT Fuel Consumption Factor (Miles/Gallon/Day) Total Fuel Consumption Demolition 5 13 14.7 956 38.37
Grading 5 10 14.7 735 29.51
Building Construction 196 25 14.7 72,030 2,892.44
Architectural Coating 22 5 14.7 1,617 64.93
3,025.26
Phase Phase Length
(# days) # Vendor Trips Vendor Trip Length Total VMT Fuel Consumption Factor (Miles/Gallon/Day) Total Fuel Consumption Demolition 5 0 6.9 - -
Grading 5 0 6.9 - -
Building Construction 196 10 6.9 69 8.27
Architectural Coating 22 0 6.9 - -

8.27 Phase Phase Length
(# days) # Hauling Trips Hauling Trip Length Total VMT Fuel Consumption Factor (Miles/Gallon/Day)1 Total Fuel Consumption
Demolition 5 98 20 1,960 234.90
Grading 5 0 20 - -
Building Construction 196 0 20 - -
Architectural Coating 22 0 20 - -
234.90
TOTAL OFF-SITE MOBILE FUEL (GALLONS) CONSUMED DURING CONSTRUCTION 3,268.43

WORKER TRIPS

VENDOR TRIPS

HAULING TRIPS

24.90284233

8.343886151

Page 908 of 2700 ends

Avid Hotel Project
Energy Calculations
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Consumption Rate (gallons per hour)
Duration (total
hours/day) # days Total Fuel Consumption (gallons)
Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8 81 0.73 2.3652 8 22 416.28 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8 247 0.40 3.952 8 22 695.55 Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8 97 0.37 1.4356 24 22 758.00 Grading Graders 1 8 187 0.41 3.0668 8 20 490.69
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8 247 0.40 3.952 8 20 632.32 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 7 97 0.37 1.4356 14 20 401.97 Building Construction Cranes 1 8 231 0.29 2.6796 8 66 1,414.83 Building Construction Forklifts 2 7 89 0.20 0.712 14 66 657.89 Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8 84 0.74 2.4864 8 66 1,312.82 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6 97 0.67 2.5996 6 66 1,029.44 Building Construction Welders 3 8 46 0.45 0.828 24 66 1,311.55 Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6 78 0.48 1.4976 6 10 89.86 TOTAL ON-SITE FUEL (GALLONS) CONSUMED DURING CONSTRUCTION 9,211.19 Notes: TOTAL OFF-SITE MOBILE FUEL (GALLONS) CONSUMED DURING CONSTRUCTION 3,268.43 Fuel Consumption Rate = Horsepower x Load Factor x Fuel Consumption Factor TOTAL FUEL (GALLONS) CONSUMED DURING CONSTRUCTION 12,479.61 Where:

Fuel Consumption Factor for a diesel engine is 0.04 gallons per horsepower per hour (gal/hp/hr) and a gasoline engine is 0.06 gal/hp/hr.

Source: Refer to CalEEMod outputs for assumptions used in this analysis.

On-Site Construction Fuel Consumption

Page 909 of 2700 ends

APPENDIX B
Cultural Resources Identification Memorandum

Page 910 of 2700 ends

September 9, 2022
Brian Lee, Community Development Director

CITY OF COVINA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
125 East College Street
Covina, CA 91723
RE: CULTURAL RESOURCES IDENTIFICATION AND EVALUATION MEMORANDUM FOR

THE AVID HOTEL PROJECT, CITY OF COVINA, LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Dear Mr. Lee:

In support of the Avid Hotel Project (project), Michael Baker International completed a cultural resources identification and evaluation study, which includes a South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) records search; literature, historical map, and aerial photo review; local historical society consultation; pedestrian survey; archaeological buried site sensitivity analysis; and evaluation of the property for inclusion in the California Register of Historical Resources (California Register) and for designation as a City of Covina historic landmark or structure of merit. These efforts were completed to determine whether the project could result in significant impacts to historical and archaeological resources as defined by California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Section 15064.5. Methods, results, and recommendations are summarized below.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project consists of building demolition, site preparation, and construction of a new hotel. The hotel building would contain a total of 68 guest rooms. Vehicular access is proposed from a driveway along Azusa Avenue and a driveway along Glentana Street. The project is anticipated to require removal of soil and materials of 5 to 6 feet below existing grade. The project will also include the installation a drywell infiltration system that will reach a depth of 40 feet below grade which is the maximum depth of ground distrubance. .

PROJECT LOCATION
The project is located at the adjacent addresses of 578-580 North Azusa Avenue and 865-867 West Glentana Street, both in Covina, Los Angeles County, California. The project is in Township 1 South, Range 10 West, Section 14 of the US Geologic Service Baldwin Park, Calif. 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle map (see Attachment 1 - Figures). The project area totals 0.85 acres within two adjacent parcels Assessor Parcel Numbers (APNs) 8432-006-015 and 8432-006-017.

APN 8432-006-017 has two extant buildings and APN 8432-006-015 is vacant.

Michael Baker

INTERNATIONAL
We Make a Difference
MBAKERINTL.COM
2729 Prospect Park Drive, Suite 220, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 P: (916) 361-8384 F: (916) 361-1574

Page 911 of 2700 ends

MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL

CULTURAL RESOURCES IDENTIFICATION MEMORANDUM FOR THE AVID HOTEL PROJECT, COVINA,

CALIFORNIA

Page 2 ends

NATURAL SETTING
The project area is within the northwest portion of the Peninsular Ranges geomorphic province.

The Peninsular Ranges geomorphic province is distinguished by northwest-trending mountain ranges and valleys following faults branching from the San Andreas Fault. The Peninsular Ranges are bound to the east by the Colorado Desert and extend north to the San Bernardino–Riverside county line, west into the submarine continental shelf, and south into Baja California (Norris and Webb 1976). The City of Covina is located in the northeastern San Gabriel Basin and is bounded by the San Jose Hills to the southeast. Geologically, the project area is situated upon surficial sediments of alluvial gravel, sand, and silt (Qa) (Dibblee and Ehrenspeck 1999). Soil survey data indicates that the entire project area is composed primarily of urban land composed of the Palmview-Tujunga soils series complex. These two soil series are deep to very deep, well-drained soils that formed in alluvial fans from granitic or related rock sources which have slopes between 0 to 15 percent (NRCS 2022).

The project area is located within the San Gabriel Valley, which is bordered by the San Gabriel Mountains on the north, the San Jose Hills on the east, the San Rafael Hills on the west, and the Puente Hills on the south. The elevation is approximately 495 feet above mean sea level. The project area is heavily urbanized and is located within the Los Angeles Plain ecoregion. Moist and cool marine air greatly moderates temperatures and rainfall in the Los Angeles Plain with annual precipitation ranging from 10 to 17 inches. The ecoregion is nearly level with flat floodplains and terraces and very gently to gently sloping alluvial fans. The soil temperature regime is thermic.

Hydrology has been greatly modified and channelized. The San Gabriel River drains the San Gabriel Valley and Mountains (Griffith et al. 2016).

CULTURAL RESOURCES IDENTIFICATION METHODS
The methods and results of the SCCIC records search, literature, historical map, aerial photo review, local historical society consultation, pedestrian survey, archaeological sensitivity analysis, and California Register evaluation are presented below.

SOUTH CENTRAL COASTAL INFORMATION CENTER
SCCIC staff conducted a cultural resource records search (File No. 23619.9708) of the project area and a half-mile area around it on April 18, 2022 (Attachment 2). The SCCIC at California State University, Fullerton, is part of the California Historical Resources Information System, an affiliate of the California Office of Historic Preservation (OHP). The SCCIC is the official state repository of cultural resources records and reports for Los Angeles County. As part of the records search and background research, the following federal and California inventories were reviewed:
• National Register of Historic Places (National Register) (National Park Service 2022). • California Inventory of Historic Resources (OHP 1976). • California Points of Historical Interest (OHP 1992 and updates).

MBAKERINTL.COM
2729 Prospect Park Drive, Suite 220, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 P: (916) 361-8384 F: (916) 361-1574

Page 912 of 2700 ends

MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL

CULTURAL RESOURCES IDENTIFICATION MEMORANDUM FOR THE AVID HOTEL PROJECT, COVINA,

CALIFORNIA

Page 3 ends

• California Historical Landmarks (OHP 1996).
• Archaeological Determinations of Eligibility (OHP 2012) for Los Angeles County. • Built Environment Resources Directory for Los Angeles County (OHP 2022a). • California Historical Resources listing (OHP 2022b).

Results
No cultural resources studies have been previously completed within the project area; one has been completed within a half-mile, as summarized below.

Report
No.

Author(s) Date Report Title Identified Cultural
Resources in Project
Area?
LA10641Tang, Bai
Tom
2010 Preliminary Historical/Archaeological Resources
Study, San Bernardino Line Positive Train Control
Project, Southern California Regional Rail Authority,
Counties of Los Angeles and San Bernardino.

No
No cultural resources were identified within the project area; one was identified within the halfmile search distance of the project area as described below:

Primary/
Trinomial No.

Address Type/Name Eligibility Status Proximity to
Project Site
P-19-187085 N/A Historic era road/
Mojave Road
A segment has been designated
California Historical Landmark
No. 963, while another segment
was recommended ineligible for
the National Register and
California Register.

Within 0.2
miles

LITERATURE, HISTORICAL MAP, AND AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH REVIEW Michael Baker staff reviewed historical maps and aerial photographs for historical information about the project area and the vicinity. Below is a list of maps and photographs reviewed followed by a narrative description of the results:
• Survey Plat Map of Township No. 1 South, Range No. 10 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian (BLM 1865, 1869, 1877)
• Covina, California Sanborn Map, 1911 (Sanborn Map Company 1911) • Covina, California Sanborn Map, 1929, revised 1932 (Sanborn Map Company 1929) • Pomona, Calif. 1:62,500 scale topographic quadrangle map (USGS 1897) • Puente, Calif. 1:24,000 scale topographic quadrangle map (USGS 1927) MBAKERINTL.COM
2729 Prospect Park Drive, Suite 220, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 P: (916) 361-8384 F: (916) 361-1574

Page 913 of 2700 ends

MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL

CULTURAL RESOURCES IDENTIFICATION MEMORANDUM FOR THE AVID HOTEL PROJECT, COVINA,

CALIFORNIA

Page 4 ends

• Aerial photograph: Flight C-300, Frame I-123 (UCSB 1928) • Aerial photograph: Flight C-13990, Frame 1-117X (UCSB 1949) • Aerial photograph: Flight AXJ-1952, Frame 19K-163 (UCSB 1954) • Aerial photograph: Flight C-23870, Frame 1054 (UCSB 1960) • Aerial photograph: Flight TG-2400, Frame 1-230 (UCSB 1968) Results
In eastern Los Angeles County, where the project is located, archaeology sites have demonstrated traits of both coastal and inland desert cultural traditions. Models of California prehistory hypothesize that its first inhabitants were big game-hunting Paleoindians who lived at the close of the last Ice Age (~11,000 years before present [BP] through the early Holocene 7,600 BP). As the environment warmed and dried, Ice Age megafauna died out, requiring adaption to local resources by groups to survive. The coastal manifestation is the San Dieguito Complex and within a lifeway known as the Paleocoastal Tradition, whereas further inland this lifeway is known as the Western Pluvial Lakes Tradition (Moratto 1984). Along the coast, rising sea levels created bays and estuaries and groups adopted marine subsistence, including fish and shellfish. These resulting shell middens contain flaked cobble tools, metates, manos, discoidals, and flexed burials and indicate a semi-sedentary lifestyle (Byrd and Raab 2007). In contrast, the Western Pluvial Lakes Tradition is generally identified by an advanced flaked-stone industry of foliate, lanceolate, and long-stemmed bifaces. People hunted diverse animal species and collected a wide number of plants from diverse ecozones, but this period lacks widespread evidence of milling stones.

Therefore, hard seed processing was likely not widely practiced and inland populations were more mobile than coastal populations (Moratto 1984). The inland tradition may continue as late as 7,000 BP (Warren and Crabtree 1986).

The middle Holocene (7,600–3,650 BP) is a time of change and transition. As conditions continued to warm and dry, lakes and streams in the desert disappeared. This resulted in a shift in subsistence strategies, namely a shift to the gathering of plant seeds, grasses, and shellfish along the coast as the primary dietary staple. This shift in subsistence is what Wallace (1955) named the Millingstone Horizon. Characteristics of the middle Holocene sites include ground stone artifacts (manos and metates) used for processing plant material and shellfish, flexed burial beneath rock or milling stone cairns, flaked core or cobble tools, dart points, cogstones, discoidals, and crescentics. Large habitations are seen in the inland areas and considerable variability of site size and population are seen along the coasts.

Characteristics of the late Holocene (3,650–233 BP) include the increased dependence on mortar and pestle for food processing, including the acorn, a change to more complex and elaborate mortuary behaviors, and the introduction of the bow and arrow and ceramic technologies toward the end of the late Holocene. Marine resource exploitation proliferated and diversified. The climate fluctuated with periods of drought alternating with cooler and moister periods (Vellanoweth and Grenda 2002; Byrd and Raab 2007; Jones et al. 2004). These fluctuations resulted MBAKERINTL.COM
2729 Prospect Park Drive, Suite 220, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 P: (916) 361-8384 F: (916) 361-1574

Page 914 of 2700 ends

MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL

CULTURAL RESOURCES IDENTIFICATION MEMORANDUM FOR THE AVID HOTEL PROJECT, COVINA,

CALIFORNIA

Page 5 ends

in dynamic regional cultural patterns with considerable local variation. Settlement strategies shifted toward permanent settlement during this period.

The project area is located within the ethnographic territory of the Gabrielino Indians approximately equidistant between the ethnographic placenames: Weniinga, located approximately 3 miles south, and Ashuukshanga, located approximately 3 miles north (McCawley 1996). The Gabrielino are Takic speakers and are descended from Late Prehistoric populations of the region. The name Gabrielino was given to the local inhabitants by Spanish missionaries who established a mission in Gabrieleno territory in 1771. Important food resources would have been acorns, agave, wild seeds and nuts, hunting game, and fishing. Due to Spanish subjugation and absorption into the mission system, the Gabrielinos’ political structure, social organization, and cultural practices were heavily impacted. Gabrielino villages were generally self-contained and had an autonomous political structure comprising non-localized lineages, in which the largest and dominant lineage’s leader was usually the village chief. Village houses were domed, circularshaped structures, constructed from tree branches and thatched with tule, fern, or carrizo. The villages would have been located near fresh water and raw material resources. Villagers would have utilized temporary camps throughout their localized territories for hunting, gathering, and raw material trips away from the main village (Bean and Shipek 1978).

The early Bureau of Land Management General Land Office survey plat depicts the project area as located due north of the lands of Rancho La Puente, although no details were mapped for the area (BLM 1865, 1869, 1877). By the late 1800s, the Southern Pacific Railroad Covina Branch traversed the area in an east-west direction approximately 500 feet north of the project area (USGS 1897). The project area was in a rural area outside of the Covina city limits in the early 1900s (Sanborn Map Company 1911, 1929). The extensive fruit-growing industry led to the development of several fruit packing houses flanking the Southern Pacific Railroad near Azusa Avenue by the 1920s (Sanborn Map Company 1929; UCSB 1928). It appears that present-day Glentana Street follows the alignment of what was a long residential driveway leading to a residence set back from Azusa Avenue (USGS 1927). The project area and surrounding vicinity consisted of orchard land dotted with single-family residences through the 1940s (UCSB 1949).

By the mid-1950s, the orchard rows in the project area were partially cleared, and at least one— possibly two—buildings were located on the site. These appear to have been single-family residences that had driveways branching off the aforementioned longer drive. Much of the surrounding orchard land to the north, east, and southeast had been replaced by residential tracts by this time (UCSB 1954).

Within a few years, the area had dramatically changed and the majority of the orchards had been lost to residential and commercial development. In 1960, Northview High School was under construction across Azusa Avenue to the northwest of the project area. Glentana Street was developed into a public street in place of the previously existing residential drive. One building had been constructed at 835 Glentana Street, but the remainder of the block west to Azusa MBAKERINTL.COM
2729 Prospect Park Drive, Suite 220, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 P: (916) 361-8384 F: (916) 361-1574

Page 915 of 2700 ends

MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL

CULTURAL RESOURCES IDENTIFICATION MEMORANDUM FOR THE AVID HOTEL PROJECT, COVINA,

CALIFORNIA

Page 6 ends

Avenue, including the project area, was undeveloped, except for the north-south alley through the project area (UCSB 1960). The extant buildings in the western portion of the project area were constructed in 1963 (Los Angeles County Assessor 2022). Additional development occurred in the immediately surrounding area during the 1960s, including the construction of the multifamily buildings at the eastern end of Glentana Street and commercial buildings along Front Street to the north (UCSB 1968).

LOCAL HISTORICAL SOCIETY CONSULTATION
On March 31, 2022, Michael Baker International mailed a letter and figures describing the project to the Covina Valley Historical Society. The letter requested information or concerns regarding historical resources within the project area (Attachment 3). A follow-up call to the Covina Valley Historical Society was completed on April 19, 2022, at which time curator Rosemarie Lippman stated she did not know of any historical resources in the area of the project. She stated Michael Baker International could send her a copy of the letter via email and she would distribute it to other historical society staff for input. Michael Baker International emailed the letter and figures to Ms. Lippman the same day.

ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND BUILT ENVIRONMENT SURVEY
On April 7, 2022, Michael Baker International cross-trained archaeologist/built environment technician Marcel Young conducted a pedestrian survey of the project area. The exposed ground surface was walked over in single transects spaced approximately 10 meters apart. The slope of the survey was flat with approximately 15 percent ground visibility due to development.

Disturbances include landscaping, grading, bioturbation, human habitation/camping, and modern refuse dumping. The majority of exposed ground surface was located on the east half of the project area in APN 8432-006-015. No cultural materials or anthropogenic soils were identified within the project area during the survey.

Mr. Young also examined the two existing buildings in the project area and noted their current condition, construction, materials, and visible alterations. Documentation included photographs and field notes. A development history, description, and photographs of the property addressed as 578-580 North Azusa Avenue are included in the California Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) 523 series forms in Attachment 4.

ARCHAEOLOGICAL BURIED SITE SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS
Sensitivity for cultural resources consisting of archaeological sites is considered low based upon no known cultural resources, various natural factors, and the previous disturbance in the project area. The SCCIC records search results and the field survey identified no cultural resources within the project area and only one historic-period resource, the Mojave Road (P-19-187085), was identified within a half-mile of the project area. The project area is located approximately 0.61 miles south of San Dimas Wash. Proximity to water, a critical resource, is significant and this distance from water indicates a lower sensitivity to prehistoric occupation. While the project is MBAKERINTL.COM
2729 Prospect Park Drive, Suite 220, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 P: (916) 361-8384 F: (916) 361-1574

Page 916 of 2700 ends

MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL

CULTURAL RESOURCES IDENTIFICATION MEMORANDUM FOR THE AVID HOTEL PROJECT, COVINA,

CALIFORNIA

Page 7 ends

underlain by Holocene-age young alluvium (11,700 years ago to today), the soil has been heavily disturbed by modern development and is urban land according to soil mapping. According to the historical map review, the project area was first developed in the 1920s as an orchard with several buildings on the property starting in 1962.

CALIFORNIA REGISTER OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION
The criteria for eligibility in the California Register are based on the National Register of Historic Places. To be eligible for listing in the California Register, a property must be at least 50 years of age (resources less than 50 years of age may be eligible if they can demonstrate that sufficient time has passed to understand its historical importance) and possess significance at the local, state, or national level, under one or more of the following criteria:

Criterion 1. It is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California’s history and cultural heritage; Criterion 2. It is associated with the lives of persons important in our past; Criterion 3. It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic value;
Criterion 4. It has yielded, or may yield, information important in history or prehistory.

In addition to meeting a significance criterion, a property must also have integrity or the ability to convey its significance under a majority of the seven aspects of integrity, which are location, design, materials, workmanship, setting, feeling, and association.

Below is the California Register evaluation for 578-580 North Azusa Avenue. The full historic context, evaluation, and photographs are located in Attachment 4.

Criterion 1 – Constructed in 1962, the buildings on the property were originally a combination of residential and office space. They were used as model homes and offices for a real estate development company which was not particularly productive or successful. Archival research did not indicate the property is associated with any significant events or trends in national, state, regional, or local history. While it is generally associated with post-World War II residential and commercial development, the property did not play an important role in the history of residential or commercial development in Covina and is not significant within those contexts. Thus, it is recommended ineligible under Criterion 1.

Criterion 2 – Archival research did not demonstrate that commercial property is associated with individuals who have made significant contributions to national, state, or local history. Therefore, the property is recommended ineligible under Criterion 2.

MBAKERINTL.COM
2729 Prospect Park Drive, Suite 220, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 P: (916) 361-8384 F: (916) 361-1574

Page 917 of 2700 ends

MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL

CULTURAL RESOURCES IDENTIFICATION MEMORANDUM FOR THE AVID HOTEL PROJECT, COVINA,

CALIFORNIA

Page 8 ends

Criterion 3 – The two buildings fronting Azusa Avenue and Glentana Street were built in a Modern Ranch style, and feature long footprints, low horizontal massing, variation in elevation bays, stucco cladding, stone and brick veneer, and low-pitched hipped and Dutch gable roofs. However, they are not outstanding or high-style examples of Modern Ranch homes. The buildings are also not good examples of residential construction because they were constructed to be used as both residential and office spaces. In addition, the two buildings exhibit alterations. For example, the incongruous roof style at the location where the two buildings meet suggests the buildings may have been separate at one time, and appear to have been bridged by that section clad with rock veneer. 865-867 Glentana Street’s appearance has been notably changed by the replacement of its original wood shake roof with two different types of non-original roof tile, one of which is Spanish in style.

Additionally, the smaller ancillary building at the rear of the property does not have any stylistic features and is not representative of any particular architectural style. The buildings were not designed or built by a master architect or builder. They do not embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, nor do they represent the work of a master or possess high artistic values. Thus, the property is recommended ineligible under Criterion 3.

Criterion 4 – National Park Service guidance for the equivalent National Register Criterion D states that certain important research questions about human history can only be answered by the actual physical material of cultural resources. The buildings do not meet the two requirements identified for eligibility under Criterion 4. The buildings on the subject property have not been used as a source of data and do not contain more, as yet unretrieved data. The buildings have not been determined, through testing or research, to be a likely source of data. Therefore, they are recommended ineligible under California Register Criterion 4, as they have not yielded and do not have the potential to yield information important to our understanding of prehistory or history of the local area, state, or nation.

COVINA HISTORIC LANDMARK/STRUCTURE OF MERIT EVALUATION
Covina Municipal Code Title 17, Chapter 17.81 states the following criteria shall be used by the planning commission and city council in designating any property as a historic landmark or structure of merit:

Criterion 1. It exemplifies or reflects special elements of the city’s cultural, social, economic, political, aesthetic, engineering, architectural or natural history; or Criterion 2. It is identified with persons or events significant in local, state, or national history; or
Criterion 3. It represents the work of a notable builder, designer, or architect; or MBAKERINTL.COM
2729 Prospect Park Drive, Suite 220, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 P: (916) 361-8384 F: (916) 361-1574

Page 918 of 2700 ends

MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL

CULTURAL RESOURCES IDENTIFICATION MEMORANDUM FOR THE AVID HOTEL PROJECT, COVINA,

CALIFORNIA

Page 9 ends

Criterion 4. It embodies distinctive characteristics of a style, type, period, or method of construction, or is a valuable example of the use of indigenous materials or craftsmanship; or
Criterion 5. It contributes to the significance of an historic area, being a geographically definable area possessing a concentration of historic or scenic properties or thematically related grouping of properties which contribute to each other and are unified aesthetically by plan or physical development; or
Criterion 6. It is one of the few remaining examples in the city of Covina, region, state, or nation possessing distinguishing characteristics of an architectural or historic type or specimen.

Below is the Covina Municipal Code evaluation for 578-580 North Azusa Avenue. The full historic context, evaluation, and photographs are located in Attachment 4.

Criterion 1 – The buildings on the property were constructed to serve a combined use of model homes and office space for a real estate development company. Archival research did not indicate the property exemplifies or reflects special elements of Covina’s cultural, social, economic, political, aesthetic, engineering, architectural, or natural history. No associations with important events or trends within the above themes were identified. Therefore, the property is recommended ineligible under Criterion 1.

Criterion 2 – As discussed above, archival research did not indicate the property is associated with persons or events significant in local, state, or national history. Thus, the property is recommended ineligible under Criterion 2.

Criterion 3 – The buildings on the property were constructed by a real estate development company that was not particularly productive or successful. The buildings were not architectdesigned; thus, they do not represent the work of a notable architect, designer, or builder. The property is recommended ineligible under Criterion 3.

Criterion 4 – None of the buildings on the property embody distinctive characteristics of a style, type, period, or method of construction, or are valuable examples of the use of indigenous materials or craftsmanship. The two primary buildings fronting Azusa Avenue and Glentana Street were built in a Modern Ranch style, and feature long footprints, low horizontal massing, variation in elevation bays, stucco cladding, stone and brick veneer, and low-pitched hipped and Dutch gable roofs. However, they are not outstanding or high-style examples of Modern Ranch style homes. The buildings are also not good examples of residential construction because they were constructed to be used as both residential and office spaces. In addition, the two buildings exhibit alterations. For example, the incongruous roof style at the location where the two buildings meet suggests the buildings may have been separate at one time, and appear to have been bridged by that section clad with rock veneer. 865-867 Glentana Street’s appearance has been notably MBAKERINTL.COM
2729 Prospect Park Drive, Suite 220, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 P: (916) 361-8384 F: (916) 361-1574

Page 919 of 2700 ends

MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL

CULTURAL RESOURCES IDENTIFICATION MEMORANDUM FOR THE AVID HOTEL PROJECT, COVINA,

CALIFORNIA

Page 10 ends

changed by the replacement of its original wood shake roof with two different types of nonoriginal roof tile, one of which is Spanish in style. Lastly, the smaller ancillary building at the rear of the property does not have any stylistic features and is not representative of any particular architectural style. The property is recommended ineligible under Criterion 4.

Criterion 5 – The subject property does not contribute to the significance of a geographically definable historic area with a concentration of historic or scenic properties, or a thematically related grouping of properties which contribute to each other and are unified aesthetically by plan or physical development.

Criterion 6 – The subject property is not one of a few remaining examples of an architectural or historic type or specimen in Covina, the state, or the nation.

In summary, the property does not appear to meet any of the criteria for designation as a Covina Historic Landmark or Structure of Merit.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
No historical or archaeological resources as defined by CEQA Section 15064.5(a) or Covina Municipal Code Title 17, Chapter 17.81 were identified within the project area as a result of the SCCIC records search; literature, map, and aerial photo review; historical society consultation; pedestrian survey; and California and City Register evaluations. Sensitivity for buried archaeological resources is low. There is a low potential for disturbing previously unknown archaeological resources during ground-disturbing activities associated with project construction.

Impacts will be avoided through the implementation of the below mitigation measures for the inadvertent discovery of archaeological cultural resources or human remains.

Archaeological Resources Inadvertent Discovery. In the event that cultural resources are unearthed during ground-disturbing activities, ground-disturbing activities must be halted or diverted away from the vicinity of the find so that the find can be evaluated. A buffer area of at least 50 feet must be established around the find where construction activities cannot be allowed to continue until a qualified archaeologist examines the newly discovered resource(s) and evaluates the area of the find. Work may be allowed to continue outside of the buffer area. All archaeological resources unearthed by project construction activities must be evaluated by a qualified professional archaeologist who meets the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards. If the resource appears to be significant, the qualified professional archaeologist, working under the direction of the lead agency and in coordination with Native American tribes and/or other stakeholders, will prepare an appropriate treatment plan for the resources. The plan may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to address treatment of the resource(s) along with subsequent laboratory processing, analysis, and curation.

MBAKERINTL.COM
2729 Prospect Park Drive, Suite 220, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 P: (916) 361-8384 F: (916) 361-1574

Page 920 of 2700 ends

MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL

CULTURAL RESOURCES IDENTIFICATION MEMORANDUM FOR THE AVID HOTEL PROJECT, COVINA,

CALIFORNIA

Page 11 ends

Human Remains Inadvertent Discovery. If human remains are discovered during construction, there shall be no further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent remains until the coroner determines that the remains are not subject to the provisions of Section 27491 of the Government Code, or any successor statute, or any other related provisions of law concerning the investigation of the circumstances, manner and cause of any death, and the recommendations concerning the treatment and disposition of the human remains have been made to the person responsible for the excavation, or their authorized representative, in the manner provided in Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code, or any successor statute. The coroner shall make his or her determination within two working days from the time the person responsible for the excavation or his or her authorized representative notifies the coroner of the discovery or recognition of the human remains. If the coroner determines that the remains are not subject to his or her authority and if the coroner recognizes the human remains to be those of a Native American or has reason to believe that they are those of a Native American, he or she shall contact, by telephone within 24 hours, the Native American Heritage Commission and the Covina Building Official.

Applicable state and federal laws include California Health and Safety Code Sections 7050.5–7055 and Section 5097.98 of the California Public Resources Code.

PREPARER QUALIFICATIONS
This report was prepared by Michael Baker International Senior Archaeologist and Principal Investigator Nicholas F. Hearth, MA, Senior Architectural Historian Susan Zamudio Gurrola, MHP, and Archaeologist Jacob Parsley, BA. Archaeologist Marcel Young, BA, completed the pedestrian survey. This report was reviewed for quality assurance and quality control by Senior Associate and Department Manager Margo Nayyar, MA.

Mr. Hearth has worked as an archaeologist in cultural resource management since 2002. He meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards for prehistoric archaeology.

He received his BA in anthropology in 2003 from the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, and his MA in anthropology in 2006 from the University of California, Riverside. Mr. Hearth has worked in California, Utah, Nevada, Arizona, New Mexico, and multiple states both in the Midwest and New England. Mr. Hearth is well versed in applying Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), CEQA, and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) on various projects across many market sectors. He has completed projects in all phases of archaeology: Phase I pedestrian and shovel test surveys, extended Phase I survey, buried site testing, archaeological sensitivity assessments, Phase II testing and evaluations, Phase III data recovery, and Phase IV monitoring. His project responsibilities include overseeing archaeological, historical, and paleontological studies, directing all phases of archaeological field and laboratory work, and ensuring that the quality of analysis and reporting meets or exceeds appropriate local, state, and federal standards.

MBAKERINTL.COM
2729 Prospect Park Drive, Suite 220, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 P: (916) 361-8384 F: (916) 361-1574

Page 921 of 2700 ends

MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL

CULTURAL RESOURCES IDENTIFICATION MEMORANDUM FOR THE AVID HOTEL PROJECT, COVINA,

CALIFORNIA

Page 12 ends

Ms. Zamudio-Gurrola is an architectural historian with over nine years of experience in cultural resource management. Her experience includes conducting archival research and built environment surveys, conducting evaluations for the National and California Registers and local designations, assessing the integrity of historic resources, developing historic context statements, reviewing projects for conformance with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards, and preparing cultural resources studies in compliance with CEQA, NEPA, Section 106 of the NHPA, and local ordinances. She also prepares cultural resources sections for CEQA environmental documents such as initial studies and environmental impact reports and has demonstrated experience preparing Caltrans-format cultural resources studies, finding of effect documents, and Historic American Buildings Survey/Historic American Engineering Record documentation for buildings and structures. Ms. Zamudio-Gurrola meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards for history and architectural history.

Mr. Parsley has worked in various capacities in cultural resource management since 2018. He is experienced in surveying, monitoring, and writing cultural resources constraints reports within the frameworks of Section 106 of the NHPA, NEPA, and CEQA. He has participated in projects in several phases of archaeology: Phase I pedestrian and shovel test surveys, buried site testing, Phase III data recovery, and Phase IV monitoring. His project highlights include archaeological surveying to update and verify cultural resources found mostly in remote areas of California, many of which have included prehistoric components. Other project responsibilities include identifying and flagging historic and prehistoric resources, delineating best access routes, conducting postimpact assessments, and reporting to the National Park Service, National Forest System, Pacific Gas and Electric, and private clients.

Mr. Young has worked in various capacities in cultural resource management since 2013. He is experienced in surveying and conducting recording and evaluations of historic and prehistoric archaeological sites in California. Mr. Young is versed in conducting fieldwork within frameworks of Section 106 of the NHPA, NEPA, and CEQA. He has participated in projects in several phases of archaeology: Phase I pedestrian, extended Phase I testing, shovel test surveys, buried site testing, Phase III data recovery, and monitoring.

Ms. Nayyar is a senior cultural resources manager with 12 years of experience in California, Nevada, Arizona, Idaho, Texas, and Mississippi. Her experience includes built environment surveys, evaluation of historic-era resources using guidelines outlined in the National and California Registers, and preparation of cultural resources technical studies pursuant to CEQA and Section 106 of the NHPA, including identification studies, finding of effect documents, memorandum of agreements, programmatic agreements, and Historic American Buildings Survey, Historic American Engineering Record, and Historic American Landscapes Survey mitigation documentation. She prepares cultural resources environmental document sections for CEQA environmental documents, including infill checklists, initial studies, environmental impact reports, and NEPA environmental documents such as environmental impact statements. She also specializes in municipal preservation planning, historic preservation ordinance updates, Native MBAKERINTL.COM
2729 Prospect Park Drive, Suite 220, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 P: (916) 361-8384 F: (916) 361-1574

Page 922 of 2700 ends

MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL

CULTURAL RESOURCES IDENTIFICATION MEMORANDUM FOR THE AVID HOTEL PROJECT, COVINA,

CALIFORNIA

Page 13 ends

American consultation, and provision of Certified Local Government training to interested local governments. She develops Survey 123 and Esri Collector applications for large-scale historic resources surveys and authors National Register nomination packets. Ms. Nayyar meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards for history and architectural history.

Sincerely,
Attachments:

Attachment 1 – Figures
Attachment 2 – Cultural Resource Records Search Results Attachment 3 – Local Historical Society Consultation
Attachment 4 – DPR 523 series forms
Nicholas Hearth, MA, RPA
Senior Archaeologist
Susan Zamudio-Gurrola, MHP
Senior Architectural Historian Jacob Parsley, BA
Archaeologist
MBAKERINTL.COM
2729 Prospect Park Drive, Suite 220, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 P: (916) 361-8384 F: (916) 361-1574

Page 923 of 2700 ends

MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL

CULTURAL RESOURCES IDENTIFICATION MEMORANDUM FOR THE AVID HOTEL PROJECT, COVINA,

CALIFORNIA

Page 14 ends

REFERENCES
Bean, Lowell J., and Florence C. Shipek. 1978. “Gabrielino.” In California, edited by Robert F.

Heizer, 538-549. Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 8, William C. Sturtevant, general editor. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.

BLM (Bureau of Land Management General Land Office). 1865. Map of Township No. 1 South, Range No. 10 West, San Bernardino Meridian.
https://glorecords.blm.gov/search/default.aspx.
———. 1869. Map of Township No. 1 South, Range No. 10 West, San Bernardino Meridian. https://glorecords.blm.gov/search/default.aspx.
———. 1877. Map of Township No. 1 South, Range No. 10 West, San Bernardino Meridian. https://glorecords.blm.gov/search/default.aspx.

Byrd, Brian F. and L. Mark Raab. 2007. "Prehistory of the Southern Bight: Models for a New Millennium." In California Prehistory: Colonization, Culture, and Complexity, edited by Terry L. Jones and Kathryn A. Klar, 215–227. New York: AltaMira Press.

Dibblee, Thomas W, and Helmut E. Ehrenspeck. 1999. Geologic map of the El Monte and Baldwin Park quadrangles, Los Angeles County, California. Dibblee Foundation Map DF-69, 1:24,000. Santa Barbara, California: Dibblee Geological Foundation.

Griffith, Glenn E., James M. Omernik, David W. Smith, Terry D. Cook, Ed Tallyn, Kendra Moseley, and Colleen B. Johnson. 2016. Ecoregions of California. Ecoregion map, 1:1,100,000.

Washington DC. US Geological Open-File Report 2016-1021.

Jones, Terry L., Gary M. Brown, L. Mark Raab, Janet L. McVickar, W. Geoffrey Spaulding, Douglas M. Kennett, Andrew York, and Phillip L. Walker. 2004. "Environmental Imperatives Reconsidered: Demographic Crises in Western North America During the Medieval Climatic Anomaly." Prehistoric California: Archaeology and the Myth of Paradise. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.

Los Angeles County Assessors Office. 2022. Accessed May 2022. https://assessor.lacounty.gov/homeowners/property-search.

McCawley, William. 1996. The First Angelinos: The Gabrielino Indians of Los Angeles. Banning, CA:

Malki Museum Press.

Moratto, Michael J. 1984. California Archaeology. San Diego: Academic Press.

MBAKERINTL.COM
2729 Prospect Park Drive, Suite 220, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 P: (916) 361-8384 F: (916) 361-1574

Page 924 of 2700 ends

MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL

CULTURAL RESOURCES IDENTIFICATION MEMORANDUM FOR THE AVID HOTEL PROJECT, COVINA,

CALIFORNIA

Page 15 ends

National Park Service. 2022. “National Register Database and Research.” Accessed April 1, 2022. https://www.nps.gov/subjects/nationalregister/database-research.htm.

Norris, Robert M., and Robert W. Webb. 1976. Geology of California. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service). 2022. Web-based soil mapping interface.

Accessed May 2022. https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/WebSoilSurvey.aspx.

OHP (California Office of Historic Preservation). 1976. California Inventory of Historic Resources.

On file with the SCCIC.
———. 1992. California Points of Historical Interest. Sacramento: California Department of Parks and Recreation.
———. 1996. California Historical Landmarks. Sacramento: California Department of Parks and Recreation.
———. 2012. Archaeological Determinations of Eligibility for Los Angeles County. On file with the SCCIC.
———. 2022a. Built Environment Resources Directory for Los Angeles County. Accessed May 2022. https://ohp.parks.ca.gov/?page_id=30338.
———. 2022b. “California Historical Resources.”
https://ohp.parks.ca.gov/ListedResources/?view=county&criteria=19 Sanborn Map Company. 1911. Covina map, sheet 1. Accessed April 1, 2022. https://lacountylibrary.org/database/.
———. 1929. Covina map, sheet 17. Accessed April 1, 2022. https://lacountylibrary.org/database/.

UCSB (University of California, Santa Barbara Library). 1928. “Flight C-300, Frame I-123.” Aerial photograph. Accessed May 2022. https://mil.library.ucsb.edu/ap_indexes/FrameFinder. _______. 1949. “Flight C-13990, Frame 1-117X.” Aerial photograph. Accessed May 2022. https://mil.library.ucsb.edu/ap_indexes/FrameFinder.
_______. 1954. “Flight AXJ-1952, Frame 19K-163.” Aerial photograph. Accessed May 2022. https://mil.library.ucsb.edu/ap_indexes/FrameFinder.

MBAKERINTL.COM
2729 Prospect Park Drive, Suite 220, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 P: (916) 361-8384 F: (916) 361-1574

Page 925 of 2700 ends

MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL

CULTURAL RESOURCES IDENTIFICATION MEMORANDUM FOR THE AVID HOTEL PROJECT, COVINA,

CALIFORNIA

Page 16 ends

_______. 1960. “Flight C-23870, Frame 1054.” Aerial photograph. Accessed May 2022. https://mil.library.ucsb.edu/ap_indexes/FrameFinder.
_______. 1968. “Flight TG-2400, Frame 1-230.” Aerial photograph. Accessed May 2022. https://mil.library.ucsb.edu/ap_indexes/FrameFinder.

USGS (US Geological Survey). 1897. Pomona, Calif. 1:62,500 scale topographic quadrangle map.

Reston, VA: US Department of the Interior.
_______. 1927. Puente, Calif. 1:24,000 scale topographic quadrangle. Accessed May 2022. https://ngmdb.usgs.gov/ht-bin/tv_browse.pl?id= 50316982b524b5b4e3dbf7901dcda5d8 Vellanoweth, René L. and Donn R. Grenda. 2002. "Paradise or Purgatory: Environments, Past and Present." In Islanders and Mainlanders: Prehistoric Context for the Southern California Bight, edited by Jeffrey H. Altschul and Donn R. Grenda 67–84. Tucson, Arizona: SRI Press.

Wallace, William. 1955. “A Suggested Chronology for Southern California Coastal Archaeology.” Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 2:214-230.

Warren, Claude N. and Robert H. Crabtree. 1986. “Prehistory of the Southwestern Area.” In Great Basin, edited by Warren L. D’Azevedo, 183-193. Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 11, William C. Sturtevant, general editor. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.

MBAKERINTL.COM
2729 Prospect Park Drive, Suite 220, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 P: (916) 361-8384 F: (916) 361-1574

Page 926 of 2700 ends

Attachment 1
Figures

Page 927 of 2700 ends

Regional Vicinity
Figure 1

AVID HOTEL PROJECT

COVINA, CA
Source: Esri, ArcGIS Online, National Geographic World Map: Covina, California Project Location
¯
0 2.5 5 10
Miles
Los Angeles
County
Map Detail
PN: 188785
&
I N J
N T A 2171 m

PLEASANT

VIEW RID GE
MAGIC

MOUNTAIN
MAGIC

MOUNTAIN
\
0 Ta tuts
La Canada
,^lintridge
Altaden#a
- c<t£ W
^FALLS*
CANYON
Foothill F
Pasadena
w
SAN
GABRIEL '■

SAN A GABRIEL
r^A
Vl
n
t
L
V
Sierra Madre SA’f
Monrovia
Duarte Glendora .Azusa •
•^C able Airport Foot!
Claremont Upland Rancfio
Cucamonga
S^p Dimas
La Verne*
Brackett FlifT
Arcadia1

SM ,J ILL
South Pasadena. *San Marino
<^Al. 1 Temple City* _
Alhambra. .San Gabriel ^
Rosemead rfe.Mon* Lva 6a|dwin^
^1 Monte *west Covina
Monterey Park
South EI*Monte
jz&f'. X i a n Jes 3
•East Los <A La Puente ... .

Angeles Montebello - e Walnyt
A^nty u . ,
U»»w.00<l . ^ Chino H,1I
J J PkA Rivera .Whittier Rowland *«—«•»
Heights
t / axk// r
, t ~r \(f7
Maywood
^ 6 ell
Bell Gardens’
outh Gate Cudahy Springs
Lynwood Downey
W T''
Ontario
Montclair “Fontario Ir
Pomona
Chino* .d>4re\
Edison Ave
-lie <
o ^ *Chino Airport
X’ Sj. T
SantaFe South Whittier
.. e* *0^ V , ' rf' -■ 4
II ■ Y... \ _ l A CMINO £Vv CHIN
' . »Brea Hin v A L l LaM,rada A LI
.Compton Norwalk \ Yorba Linda MmiAir„ «*f
VT Paraftiount ^e||flower
i
La Mirada *
Brea
__ |
Fullerton
Jiiun. a.,port x .Placentia
Artesia* Buena Park* Fullerton
Lakewood* *Cerritos
La Palma
/ ffr ‘ * r II 7'(pikauawus
Long Beach Xawaiian Gardens 57
^ A'?"* Cyfrress
Corona*
Cypress
Los Alarqitos ,r , ...

Stanton Anaheim Lo^Alaftlms Aati.X //1
★
Michael Baker

INTERNATIONAL

Page 928 of 2700 ends

Project Vicinity
Figure 2

AVID HOTEL PROJECT

COVINA, CA
Source: Esri, ArcGIS Online, USGS 7.5-Minute topographic quadrangle maps: Covina, California PN: 188785
Project Area
¯
0 0.25 0.5 1
Miles
Baldwin Park Quad
Baldwin Park Quad
5Tvr
*7VT
mm
fit III1
** l*___ a
■ I
■ rr“«Tr^ • i
ncW&u*
"Spreadinj^JL
r^U0- OV<yOn<Js. ;/
si Valley i
inrtanuml
Valle
fait* JL£322fi£fi££=^»i',
•a^ lr^ ~_LL
umiiiumig I mm ?RO »0<r
i : 4IJ.1 !■■ /wuiu1
*wf i 'a M ill KB c—
a % L .T *
==
rfMg
NA
l!cy
■ >...... Sch /
.v • It-3
HS
rJL, j- » ••.»••*• n
, !»•■**• C
*/7 ff A Valencia
w Sch
:

Hoileo
\ i 5: : P»»t
4* •;o<
*c/z
I' V
i •!) i2JL3*§"-«vi
.
*•5 AMflUN
iilPOSs^sr •—1 T --S
, SSTJ f
w&L
j i
* i
i
’ 5
1 ' ■.., SI
/ " «& :h^ e v
lJl2
8M
tTTV^ ss
P S
fe3
- -f
-• z
r-v h o
HH
[NOrllTMW ^
H;gh S<h ' a r~!
“ hr-rf?P. *»■■■ ‘~WF{i
Pj K
old
p'l ifll ^* S<h 1
Or Sch
! ic^-
IJS A i 7J1 Coy
^w^»*hi n« Bb> r
r^*
1 ryOff*
HOC# 11; asr rj “ j*!4
*
2 JL] ii ■ a^*Tl ••■ ho5ea u
PC'
MS 5 7- BN 84O/Li0» V
iewwbIlb . 4-
cov
3unV»t
H
'ttuTt L*r '
koy.'&j
v—«=
I
U< V
sor
• 5' Of* VE Ml
M =3 Park -----------i
JLEB a*
[Covina
HS
sdb^r ?>
gS*lAH*W 1
HI Mm A ve M M
=-f °T‘* cfl- ] >
gjnt 7
t □□ &rkjfA
5 ,DD
I
S ii &
3ttW
:
:
c a f
BDY Bv
V
43’
vihcen
■
uu Ko isnuQ fAeewXy LAM S>JAy BERN A
i*;. n»*B -
c»
*.•
i nx^ /
vr>
'
Michael Baker

Page 929 of 2700 ends

Project Area
Figure 3

AVID HOTEL PROJECT

COVINA, CA
Source: Esri, ArcGIS Online, 2021 Nearmap Imagery: Covina, California W Front St
Glentana St
N Azusa Ave
N Azusa Ave
PN: 188785
Project Area
¯
0 50 100 200
Feet
39 39
«! I
*
P
•»
-
. B
w Front St □ _ \
*
C
-..
•».
>
*■ <D
>
m
l
ff
na
■
□
1 -.
__
Michael Baker

INTERNATIONAL

Page 930 of 2700 ends

Attachment 2
Cultural Resource Records Search
Results

Page 931 of 2700 ends

South Central Coastal Information Center
California State University, Fullerton
Department of Anthropology MH-426
800 North State College Boulevard
Fullerton, CA 92834-6846
657.278.5395 / FAX 657.278.5542
[email protected]
California Historical Resources Information System
Orange, Los Angeles, and Ventura Counties
_____________________________________________________________________________ 4/18/2022 Records Search File No.: 23619.9708

Susan Zamudio-Gurrola
Michael Baker International
2729 Prospect Park Drive Suite 220
Rancho Cordova CA 95670
Re: Records Search Results for the Avid Hotel Project #188785 The South Central Coastal Information Center received your records search request for the project area referenced above, located on the Baldwin Park, CA USGS 7.5’ quadrangle. Due to the COVID-19 emergency, we have temporarily implemented new records search protocols. With the exception of some reports that have not yet been scanned, we are operationally digital for Los Angeles, Orange, and Ventura Counties. See attached document for your reference on what data is available in this format.

The following reflects the results of the records search for the project area and a ½-mile radius:

As indicated on the data request form, the locations of resources and reports are provided in the following format: ☐ custom GIS maps ☒ shape files ☐ hand drawn maps Resources within project area: 0 None
Resources within ½-mile radius: 1 SEE ATTACHED LIST
Reports within project area: 0 None
Reports within ½-mile radius: 1 SEE ATTACHED LIST
Resource Database Printout (list): ☐ enclosed ☒ not requested ☐ nothing listed Resource Database Printout (details): ☒ enclosed ☐ not requested ☐ nothing listed Resource Digital Database (spreadsheet): ☒ enclosed ☐ not requested ☐ nothing listed Report Database Printout (list): ☐ enclosed ☒ not requested ☐ nothing listed Report Database Printout (details): ☒ enclosed ☐ not requested ☐ nothing listed Report Digital Database (spreadsheet): ☒ enclosed ☐ not requested ☐ nothing listed Resource Record Copies: ☒ enclosed ☐ not requested ☐ nothing listed Report Copies: ☒ enclosed ☐ not requested ☐ nothing listed OHP Built Environment Resources Directory (BERD) 2019: ☒ available online; please go to https://ohp.parks.ca.gov/?page_id=30338
Archaeo Determinations of Eligibility 2012: ☐ enclosed ☐ not requested ☒ nothing listed Los Angeles Historic-Cultural Monuments ☐ enclosed ☒ not requested ☐ nothing listed

Page 932 of 2700 ends

Historical Maps: ☐ enclosed ☒ not requested ☐ nothing listed Ethnographic Information: ☒ not available at SCCIC
Historical Literature: ☒ not available at SCCIC
GLO and/or Rancho Plat Maps: ☒ not available at SCCIC
Caltrans Bridge Survey: ☒ not available at SCCIC; please go to http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/structur/strmaint/historic.htm Shipwreck Inventory: ☒ not available at SCCIC; please go to http://shipwrecks.slc.ca.gov/ShipwrecksDatabase/Shipwrecks_Database.asp Soil Survey Maps: (see below) ☒ not available at SCCIC; please go to http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx Please forward a copy of any resulting reports from this project to the office as soon as possible. Due to the sensitive nature of archaeological site location data, we ask that you do not include resource location maps and resource location descriptions in your report if the report is for public distribution. If you have any questions regarding the results presented herein, please contact the office at the phone number listed above.

The provision of CHRIS Data via this records search response does not in any way constitute public disclosure of records otherwise exempt from disclosure under the California Public Records Act or any other law, including, but not limited to, records related to archeological site information maintained by or on behalf of, or in the possession of, the State of California, Department of Parks and Recreation, State Historic Preservation Officer, Office of Historic Preservation, or the State Historical Resources Commission.

Due to processing delays and other factors, not all of the historical resource reports and resource records that have been submitted to the Office of Historic Preservation are available via this records search. Additional information may be available through the federal, state, and local agencies that produced or paid for historical resource management work in the search area. Additionally, Native American tribes have historical resource information not in the CHRIS Inventory, and you should contact the California Native American Heritage Commission for information on local/regional tribal contacts.

Should you require any additional information for the above referenced project, reference the record search number listed above when making inquiries. Requests made after initial invoicing will result in the preparation of a separate invoice.

Thank you for using the California Historical Resources Information System, Michelle Galaz Cornforth
Assistant Coordinator

Page 933 of 2700 ends

Covina City CouncilJune 18, 2024

Covina City Council
June 18, 2024