Crescent City City Council
June 20, 2022

JCI furthermore agrees to insert the appropriate Goals and Timetables issued by the U.S. Department of Labor in such contracts and subcontracts.

19. OFFER OF ASSIGNMENT OF ANTITRUST ACTIONS. As provided by Sections 4550 and 4551 of the Government Code, in entering into a public works contract or a subcontract to supply goods, services, or materials pursuant to a public works contract, JCI and its subcontractors offer and agree to assign to the awarding body all rights, title, and interest in and to all causes of action it may have under Section 4 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. Sec. 15) or under the Cartwright Act (Chapter 2 [commencing with Section 16700] of Part 2 of Division 7 of the Business and Professions Code), arising from purchases of goods, services, or materials pursuant to the public works contract or the subcontract. This assignment is effective at the time the awarding body tenders final payment to JCI, without further acknowledgment by the parties.

20. NONDISCRIMINATION. JCI, its subcontractors, manufacturers and suppliers must not unlawfully discriminate, harass, or allow harassment against any employee or applicant for employment because of sex, sexual orientation, race, color, ancestry, religious creed, national origin, physical disability (including HIV and AIDS), mental disability, medical condition (cancer/genetic characteristics), age (over 40), marital status, denial of family and medical care leave, denial of pregnancy disability leave or reasonable accommodation. JCI, its subcontractors, manufacturers, and suppliers must ensure that the evaluation and treatment of their employees Johnson Controls, Inc. – Proprietary
© 2022 Johnson Controls, Inc. 7
and applicants for employment are free from such discrimination and harassment. JCI, its subcontractors, manufacturers, and suppliers must comply with the provisions of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (Government Code Section 12990 (a-f) et seq.) and the applicable regulations promulgated thereunder (California Code of Regulations, Title 2, Section 7285 et seq.). The applicable regulations of the Fair Employment and Housing Commission implementing Government Code Section 12990 (a-f), set forth in Chapter 5 of Division 4 of Title 2 of the California Code of Regulations, are incorporated into this Agreement by reference and made a part hereof as if set forth in full. JCI, its subcontractors, manufacturers, and suppliers must give written notice of their obligations under this clause to labor organizations with which they have a collective bargaining or other agreement. JCI must include the nondiscrimination and compliance provisions of this clause in all subcontracts to perform work under the Agreement.

21. DOMESTIC PREFERENCE. In accordance with 2 CFR 2003.22, as appropriate and to the extent consistent with law, JCI should, to the greatest extent practicable under this Agreement, provide a preference for the purchase, acquisition, or use of goods, products, or materials produced in the United States (including but not limited to iron, aluminum, steel, cement, and other manufactured products). The requirements of this paragraph must be included in all subawards and in all contracts and purchase orders for work or products under this Agreement.

22. COMPLIANCE WITH ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS. JCI must comply with all applicable standards, orders or regulations issued pursuant to the Clean Air Act (42 USC 7401-7671Q) and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act as amended (33 USAC 1251-1387). Violations must be reported to the Federal awarding agency and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

23. DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION. JCI represents and warrants that it is not listed on the government wise exclusions in the System for Award Management (SAM), in accordance with OMB guidelines at 2 CFR 180 that implements Executive Orders 12549 (3 CFR part 1986 Comp., p. 189) and 12689 (3 CFR part 1989 Comp., p. 235) “Debarment and Suspension.”

24. Should the Contractor, or the Contractor’s agent, or employee or any of them, be enjoined from furnishing or using any invention, article, material or plans supplied or required to be supplied or used under this contract, the Contractor at its election must promptly pay such royalties and secure the requisite licenses; subject to acceptance by the Owner, substitute other articles, materials or appliances in lieu thereof which are of equal efficiency, quality, finish, suitability, and market value to those planned or required under the contract; or issue a refund of amounts paid for the infringing work, less depreciation over a three (3) year period. Descriptive information of these substitutions must be submitted to the Owner or its construction manager for determination of general conformance to the design concept and the construction contract. Should the Owner elect to refuse the substitution, the Contractor agrees to pay such royalties and secure such valid licenses as may be requisite for the Owner, the Owner’s officers, agents, and employees or any of them, to use such invention, article, material, or appliance without being disturbed or in any way interfered with by any proceeding in law or equity arising from that use. Liability for infringement this Section should exclude: (i) misuse or modification of the product by Customer or its employees, or agents, (ii) use of the product or work in combination with other materials, goods, products, or services for which the product was not intended to be used (as demonstrated by JCI’s applicable product literature), (iii) failure of Customer to implement any update provided by JCI that would have prevented the claim, (iv) work that JCI made to Customer or its agents specifications or designs, (v) product that is not manufactured by JCI, and (iv) claims with respect to third party hardware, software or services.

25. INDEMNIFICATION. To the fullest extent permitted by applicable Law, JCI and Customer shall indemnify (each an “Indemnifying Party”) each other (“Indemnified Party”) for all damages, losses, and expenses with respect to any third-party claims against the Indemnified Party for personal injury (including death) or tangible property damage, but only to the extent such damages, losses, and expenses are caused by the negligence or willful misconduct of the Indemnifying Party in fulfilling its obligations under this Agreement.

Johnson Controls, Inc. – Proprietary
© 2022 Johnson Controls, Inc. 8

26. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY. NEITHER JCI NOR CUSTOMER WILL BE RESPONSIBLE TO THE OTHER FOR

ANY SPECIAL, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, REMOTE, PUNITIVE, EXEMPLARY, LOSS OF PROFITS OR

REVENUE, LOSS OF USE, OR SIMILAR DAMAGES, REGARDLESS OF HOW CHARACTERIZED AND

REGARDLESS OF A PARTY HAVING BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH POTENTIAL

LOSSES OR RELIEF, ARISING IN ANY MANNER FROM THIS AGREEMENT, THE WORK, THE IMPROVEMENT MEASURES, THE PREMISES, OR OTHERWISE.JCI’S LIABILITY UNDER THIS AGREEMENT, REGARDLESS OF THE FORM OF ACTION, SHALL IN NO EVENT EXCEED $5,000,000. .

The foregoing waivers and limitations are fundamental elements of the basis for this Agreement between JCI and Customer, and each party acknowledges that JCI would not be able to provide the work and services contemplated by this Agreement on an economic basis in the absence of such waivers and limitations and would not have entered into this Agreement without such waivers and limitations.

27. FORCE MAJEURE EVENTS. Neither party will be responsible to the other for damages, loss, injury, or delay caused by Force Majeure Events. As used herein, “Force Majeure Events” are conditions that are beyond the reasonable control and without the intentional misconduct or negligence of a party, either foreseeable or unforeseeable, including, without limitation, severe weather, flooding, seismic disturbances, acts of God, acts or omissions of government agencies, condemnation, strikes, labor disputes, epidemics, pandemics, disease, quarantines or other public health risks and/or responses, fires, explosions or other casualties, thefts, vandalism, riots or war, oracts of terrorism. If a party is delayed in achieving one or more of its schedule milestones set forth in the Agreement due to a Force Majeure Event, the affected party will be entitled to extend the relevant completion date by the magnitude of the Force Majeure Event plus additional time to overcome the effect of the delay. If the Force Majeure Event directly or indirectly increases JCI’s cost to perform, Customer is obligated to reimburse JCI for such increased costs.

28. PRICE ESCALATION. In the event the City issues the Notice to Proceed by June 24th 2022, JCI takes on the risk of price escalation. In the event the City does not issue the Notice to Proceed by June 24th, JCI shall be entitled to additional time and cost to overcome the effect of the delay. In the event of an increase for the cost of any parts, materials or supplies between the date of the Agreement and date of execution of Notice to Proceed, JCI shall be entitled to an increase in contract price to address the additional costs. In the event of an increase greater than 10% for the cost of any parts, materials, or supplies the parties shall discuss an appropriate risk sharing to be mutually agreed upon and in the event no agreement is reached, either party can terminate the Agreement for their own convenience with JCI to be reimbursed all reasonable costs associated with this Agreement incurred up to the date of termination and all reasonable costs associated with the termination of the Agreement

29. JCI'S PROPERTY. All materials furnished or used by JCI personnel and/or JCI subcontractors or agents at the installation-site, including documentation, schematics, test equipment, software, and associated media remain the exclusive property of JCI or such other third-party. Customer agrees not to use such materials for any purpose at any time without the express authorization of JCI. Customer agrees to allow JCI personnel and/or JCI subcontractors or agents to retrieve and remove all such materials remaining after installation or maintenance operations have been completed. Customer acknowledges that any software furnished in connection with the Work is proprietary and subject to the provisions of any software license agreement associated with such software.

30. TERMINATION.
a. For Convenience of Customer. Customer will have the option, in its sole discretion, to terminate this Agreement, at any time during the term hereof, for convenience and without cause. City may exercise this option by giving JCI written notice of termination of at least 30 days in advance. The notice shall specify the date on which termination will be effective. Customer will pay all reasonable costs associated with this Agreement that JCI has incurred up to the date of termination, and all reasonable costs associated with the termination of the Agreement.
b. For Cause. Either party may terminate this Agreement for cause if the other party fails to cure a material breach of this Agreement within 30 days of having received notice thereof. However, if the nature of the Johnson Controls, Inc. – Proprietary
© 2022 Johnson Controls, Inc. 9
breach makes it impractical to cure the breach within 30 days, then non-performing party shall have commenced to cure the breach within 30 days; and the other party shall not terminate the Agreement so long as the non-performing party diligently pursues the cure.

31. DISPUTES. JCI and Customer will attempt to settle any controversy, dispute, difference, or claim between them concerning the performance, enforcement, or interpretation of this Agreement (collectively, “Dispute”) through direct discussion in good faith, but if unsuccessful, will submit any Dispute to non-binding mediation in the nearest major metropolitan area of the state where the project is performed. If the parties are unable to agree on a mediator or a date for mediation, either party may request JAMS, Inc. to appoint a mediator and designate the time and procedure for mediation. Such mediator shall be knowledgeable, to each party’s reasonable satisfaction, with respect to matters concerning construction law. Neither JCI nor Customer will file a lawsuit against the other until not less than sixty (60) days after the mediation referred to herein has occurred, unless one or both parties is genuinely and reasonably concerned that any applicable statute of limitations is on the verge of expiring.

32. GOVERNING LAW. This Agreement and the construction and enforceability thereof shall be interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California.

33. ATTORNEY’S FEES. If civil litigation is ultimately filed in a court of competent jurisdiction by either party to enforce or interpret this Agreement, then the prevailing party will be entitled to an award of reasonable attorney’s fees and costs.

34. 179D BENEFITS. As a result of JCI’s design and implementation of this Project, a federal income tax deduction under Section 179D of the Internal Revenue Code (“IRC 179D”) may become available to JCI as the party primarily responsible for designing energy efficiency improvements implemented at Customer’s facilities.

Congress provided in IRC 179D(d)(4) for government owners, which do not pay income tax and are thus ineligible to use this deduction, to allocate the deduction to the party primarily responsible for designing the energy efficiency improvements, here JCI. Customer hereby agrees to allocate to JCI any such applicable deduction and any similar deduction enacted by Congress to replace IRC 179D. Customer shall cooperate with JCI by executing annually, during the term of this Agreement, and promptly returning to JCI, a written allocation, and declaration required by IRC 179D. JCI will prepare and is responsible for the accuracy of any allocation documents and all accompanying documentation provided for Customer’s execution. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, Customer makes no representation concerning the availability or applicability of any such tax deduction benefits or of their ability to be allocated to or claimed by JCI. JCI assumes all risks related to such allocation and deduction.

35. CONSENTS; APPROVALS; COOPERATION. Whenever Customer’s consent, approval, satisfaction, or determination shall be required or permitted under this Agreement, and this Agreement does not expressly state that Customer may act in its sole discretion, such consent, approval, satisfaction, or determination shall not be unreasonably withheld, qualified, conditioned, or delayed, whether or not such a “reasonableness” standard is expressly stated in this Agreement. Whenever Customer’s cooperation is required by JCI in order to carry out JCI’s obligations hereunder, Customer agrees that it shall act in good faith and reasonably in so cooperating with JCI and/or JCI’s designated representatives or assignees or subcontractors. Customer shall furnish decisions, information, and approvals required by this Agreement in a timely manner so as not to delay the performance of the Work.

36. NO IMPLIED WAIVER. Except as herein provided, no action or want of action on the part of the Contractor (JCI), Customer or Customer’s representative at any time with respect to the exercise of any right or remedies conferred upon them under this Agreement is a waiver on the part of the Contractor and Customer of any of their rights or remedies. No waiver is effective except in writing by the party to be charged. No waiver of one right or remedy acts as a waiver of any other right or remedy or as a subsequent waiver of the same right or remedy.

37. FURTHER ASSURANCES. The parties shall execute and deliver all documents and perform all further acts that may be reasonably necessary to effectuate the provisions of this Agreement.

Johnson Controls, Inc. – Proprietary
© 2022 Johnson Controls, Inc. 10

38. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The relationship of the parties hereunder shall be that of independent contractors. Nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed to create a partnership, joint venture, fiduciary, or similar relationship between the parties.

39. POWER AND AUTHORITY. Each party represents and warrants to the other that (i) it has all requisite power and authority to execute and deliver this Agreement and perform its obligations hereunder, (ii) all corporate, board, body politic, or other approvals necessary for its execution, delivery, and performance of this Agreement have been or will be obtained, and (iii) this Agreement constitutes its legal, valid, and binding obligation.

40. SEVERABILITY. In the event that any clause, provision, or portion of this Agreement or any part thereof shall be declared invalid, void, or unenforceable by any court having jurisdiction, such invalidity shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining portions of this Agreement unless the result would be manifestly inequitable or materially impair the benefits intended to inure to either party under this Agreement.

41. COMPLETE AGREEMENT. It is understood and agreed that this Agreement contains the entire agreement between the parties relating to all issues involving the subject matter of this Agreement. No binding understandings, statements, promises, or inducements contrary to this Agreement exist. This Agreement supersedes and cancels all previous agreements, negotiations, communications, commitments, and understandings with respect to the subject matter hereof, whether made orally or in writing. Each of the parties to this Agreement expressly warrants and represents to the other that no promise or agreement which is not herein expressed has been made to the other and that neither party is relying upon any statement or representation of the other that is not expressly set forth in this Agreement. Each party hereto is relying exclusively on the terms of this Agreement, its own judgment, and the advice of its own legal counsel and/or other advisors in entering into this Agreement. Customer acknowledges and agrees that any purchase order issued by Customer associated with this Agreement is intended only to establish payment authority for Customer’s internal accounting purposes. No purchase order shall be considered a counteroffer, amendment, modification, or other revision to the terms of this Agreement.

42. HEADINGS. The captions and titles in this Agreement are for convenience only and shall not affect the interpretation or meaning of this Agreement.

43. COUNTERPARTS. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, all of which when taken together shall constitute one single agreement between the parties.

44. NOTICES. All notices or communications related to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed served if and when sent by facsimile or mailed by certified or registered mail: to Johnson Controls, Inc. at the address listed on the first page of this Agreement, ATTN: Regional Solutions Manager, with a copy to Johnson Controls, Inc., ATTN: General Counsel – Building Efficiency Americas, 507 East Michigan Street, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53202: and to Customer at the address listed on the first page of this Agreement.

CITY OF CRESCENT CITY JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC.

Signature: Signature:

Printed Name: Printed Name:

Title: Title:

Date: Date:

Schedule 1
Johnson Controls, Inc. – Proprietary
© 2022 Johnson Controls, Inc. 11
Schedule 1 – Scope of Work for Swimming Pool Improvements Overview Summary
The Fred Endert Municipal Pool, located at 1000 Play St. Crescent City, CA 95531, was evaluated to identify potential Facility Improvement Measures (FIMs) to be applied to the swimming pool building systems. After the development of these potential identified FIMs, the Customer has agreed to the following FIMs which will be executed through this contract. The agreed upon FIMs are outlined in Table 1: Swimming Pool FIMs List.

Table 1: Swimming Pool FIMs List
FIM ID Name Description
FIM 1 Pool VSD Install a new premium efficiency motor and variable speed drive (VSD) on the main pool circulation pump
FIM 2 Pool Dehumidification Install new building dehumidifier units FIM 3 Spa Cover Provide new spa cover blanket only
FIM 4 Spa Booster Pump Timer Replace on/off switch with timer for spa jet booster pump FIM 5 Spa Heater Replacement Replace 11kW heater with heating hot water (HHW) heat exchanger FIM 6 Boiler Replacements Replace the pool and house existing boilers with new condensing boilers FIM 7 Building Envelope Repair building envelope
This project shall be performed under a Design-Build method. This will include the following:
• Phase One – Final Engineering Design shall be initiated and completed upon issuance of Notice to Proceed of this contract:
 Perform final engineering for construction.
 Prepare 100% final engineered construction drawings.
 100% final construction stamped engineered drawings shall be provided as outlined in Table 2: Engineering Drawing Deliverables.

Table 2: Engineering Drawing Deliverables
FIM ID Mechanical Electrical Structural
FIM 1 No Yes No
FIM 2 Yes Yes Yes
FIM 4 No Yes No
FIM 5 Yes Yes No
FIM 6 Yes Yes No
FIM 7 Yes No No
 Non-stamped drawings for FIMs used for final design and specifications listed in Table 3:

Non-Stamped engineered drawings.

Table 3: Non-Stamped Engineered Drawings
FIM ID Mechanical Electrical Structural
FIM 3 Yes No No
Schedule 1
Johnson Controls, Inc. – Proprietary
© 2022 Johnson Controls, Inc. 12
 The following lists the content of each construction drawing:
▪ Mechanical
o Equipment specification and sizing
o Equipment locations and installation details
o Material specifications
▪ Structural
o Equipment supporting infrastructure or building structure modifications ▪ Electrical
o Electrical power load study and confirmation
o MCC modifications
o Wiring system specifications
o Electrical equipment locations
 The Customer shall have final design acceptance before construction commences. • Phase Two – Implement design determined in Stage One through onsite installations and construction.

Scope of Work for Individual FIM
FIM 1: Pool VSD
General
This FIM scope shall modify the existing main pool circulation pumping system from a constant speed pumping to a variable speed pumping system. This modification will require the installation of a new VSD and a new replacement premium efficiency electric pump motor. Location and detailed information of the electric motor and VSD are listed in Table 4: VSD Installation below.

Table 4: VSD Installation
Customer
Asset ID #
Location Description Motor
hp
Motor
Volts /
Phase
Insulation
Class Efficiency Rating
Pool
Pump
Mechanical
Room
Main Pool
Circulation Pump 10 208/3 F

ENERGY STAR
Premium
Demolition and Removal Work
• Update/upgrade the existing main pool circulation pump motor MCC bucket starter as required. • Electrically disconnect the existing pool pump motor. • Remove existing pump 10 hp motor from pump frame.
• Properly dispose of removed motor, equipment, and waste materials.

New Installation Work
• Provide new VSD. VSD shall have the following features:
 Three Phase – contactor bypass.
 Harmonic filter.

Schedule 1
Johnson Controls, Inc. – Proprietary
© 2022 Johnson Controls, Inc. 13
 Fusible or circuit breaker disconnect needs will be determined, designed, and specified to meet electrical code requirements per final construction drawings. • Mount VSD, including required supports compliant with local seismic regulations per final construction drawings.
• Provide electrical power wiring from the main electrical panel MCC unit to the new VSD. Reuse existing electrical wiring where possible as noted on the final construction drawings. • Modify electrical power wiring and MCC starter bucket as noted on final construction drawings. • Perform startup and checkout procedures and verify the full range of operation and control features per manufacturers’ startup and checkout procedures. • Provide new premium efficiency VSD compatible motor to the existing pump housing. Motor size and location are listed in Table 4.
• Align the new motor drive shaft to the existing pump shaft. • Electrically connect the new premium motor to the new VSD electrical power output port. • Verify new motor rotation.
• Perform Startup and Testing to manufacturer supplied specifications.  VSD shall operate per final engineering drawing stated sequence of operation. ▪ VSD shall operate at reduce speed during unoccupied hours of building operation while still maintaining pool water quality through the use of a timer control system specified in final engineering drawings.
• JCI to provide required materials for this scope of work.

Inclusions and Exclusions
Inclusions
• Submittal of operations and maintenance documentation in PDF format. • Startup and checkout documents.

Exclusions:
• Repair or replacement of defective mechanical/controls equipment, other than the equipment specifically described in the FIM description. JCI will identify the location of defective equipment and notify the Customer.
• Temporary space conditioning or pool water circulation pumping, unless otherwise specified. • Resolution of existing design, service upgrades, and or distribution conditions known or unknown.

Schedule 1
Johnson Controls, Inc. – Proprietary
© 2022 Johnson Controls, Inc. 14
FIM 2: Pool Dehumidifier
General
This FIM is to replace the two (2) existing 1963 100% outside air-handling units (AHU) in the attic space above the administration offices with two (2) new dehumidifier AHUs.

Phase One – Complete Engineering Design
The following final and detailed engineering design shall be completed upon issuance of Notice to Proceed of this contract:
• Structural engineering
 Attic floor evaluation to support dehumidifiers.
 Roof evaluation to support the dehumidifier’s condenser units.  Roof or wall penetration specification for new outside air louver.  New roof hatch access design from attic to roof.
• Mechanical engineering
 Flexible fabric air supply ductwork.
▪ Routing and sizing along the pool room windows to minimize water condensation on windows:
o Will be reviewed by the dehumidifier manufacturer.
o Ensure AHU supply airflow properly inflates fabric sock ductwork.  Routing and sizing of supply and return ductwork.
 Routing and sizing of existing and new HHW supply and return lines.  Control valve sizing and specification.
 Insulation of the new piping and equipment location and specifications.  Outside air ventilation specifications and design inclusive of the dehumidifier’s intake and new exhaust fan airflow quantities.
 Control sequence to operate in accordance with regulations and maximize system performance.
• Electrical engineering
 Electrical one-line for power connection between the existing motor control center equipment and dehumidifier AHUs.
 MCC bucket motor starter specifications.
 Controls diagram.
▪ One dehumidifier programable BACnet compatible controller to operate both dehumidifier AHUs
o Programmed to maintain humidity and space air temperature setpoints. o Dehumidifier AHU blower fan to operate 24 hours/day 365 days/year to maintain humidity level balances in the building.
o Both dehumidifier AHUs shall be programmed to operate in parallel and sequence with each other.
▪ Specify the location of humidity and temperature sensors in return air ducts of each dehumidifier AHU.

Schedule 1
Johnson Controls, Inc. – Proprietary
© 2022 Johnson Controls, Inc. 15
Phase Two – Implement Design
Demolition and Removal Work
• Remove two (2) existing AHUs from the attic space, remove them from the site, and dispose of them according to local and State requirements in effect at the time of contract signing. • Remove supply and return ductwork transitions as required at the existing AHUs as indicated on engineering drawings.
• Modify or seal the existing outside louver vents from the building wall as indicated on engineering drawings.
• Remove HHW supply and return piping from AHUs to HHW supply and return headers in the mezzanine space to accommodate the new installation.
• Remove existing HHW AHU control valves; Valves shall be turned over to Crescent City. • Remove four (4) existing roof-mounted exhaust fans on the east side of the building from the roof. • Cap and seal three (3) existing exhaust fan curbs; one (1) to remain. • Existing four (4) exhaust fan inside ceiling grilles to remain • Disconnect and remove existing wiring and conduit from both AHU motors or reuse them for dehumidifier power circuitry installation based on engineering specifications. • Disconnect and remove control wiring to sensors and control valves.

New Installation Work
The following installation scope shall be performed based on the final design-build drawing package as stated above under engineering design for this FIM.
• Dehumidifier AHU system shall consist of two (2) dehumidifying units that consist of the following:
 Factory-built supplied dehumidification system.
 Use of refrigerant hot gas bypass system to maintain pool room humidity and temperature setpoint through latent heat recovery.
 Duct mounted HHW coil to supplement heat during hot gas bypass heat recovery and when the AHU is in heating mode only, no dehumidification, to maintain pool room space temperature.
 Outside air-cooled refrigerant condenser
 One (1) system controller to operate both units to set the humidity and temperature desired by occupants.
• New dehumidifiers to be installed compliant with local seismic regulations in effect at the time of contract signing.
• Install and route new flexible fabric type ductwork in pool room per engineering drawings. • Install mechanical mezzanine room rigid ductwork as required for supply and return per engineering drawings.
• Install and route new ductwork from building exterior to dehumidifier’s outside air intake port per engineering drawings.
• Install two (2) new dehumidifier condensers on the roof per engineering drawings Schedule 1
Johnson Controls, Inc. – Proprietary
© 2022 Johnson Controls, Inc. 16
• Install new roof hatch located in mechanical room mezzanine to access roof-mounted condensing units.
• Install new HHW piping from the existing HHW supply and return headers in the mezzanine space to the new dehumidifier’s integral HHW coils.
• Install new manufacturer supplied control valve in new HHW return lines per specifications. • Startup and check out both dehumidifiers.
• Install one (1) new exhaust fan on the existing exhaust fan curb. • Install new or reuse conduit and conductors as per engineering drawing to connect electrical power to new dehumidifiers and roof-mounted condensers. • Install new electric bucket starters in existing MCC unit per engineering drawings for dehumidifier AHUs.
• Install new electrical buckets or breakers in existing MCC or load center per engineering drawings for roof-mounted condensers.
• Connect dehumidifier systems and HHW valve control wiring to manufacturer supplied controller located in the mechanical mezzanine location.
• Mount dehumidifier humidity and temperature sensors in each dehumidifier’s return duct per engineering drawing specifications.
• Install and route dehumidifier AHU condensate discharge to the nearest drain location.

Inclusions and Exclusions
Inclusions
• Required cranes and rigging.
• Coordination of street or parking lot traffic control and closures. • Submit O&M documentation in PDF format.
• Water balance of final system installation with other FIMs. Air balance not required. • Structural analysis as stated in the scope.
• Startup, checkout, and 4 hours of operations staff training.

Exclusions
• Repair, replacement of existing unknown defective or non-code compliant mechanical, electrical, or controls equipment, except the equipment described in this FIM description. JCI will identify and locate defective equipment and notify the Customer. • Repair or upgrades required to bring adjacent controls, electrical and mechanical systems up to code.
• Existing building ventilation conditions, indoor air quality issues. • Existing duct and coil cleaning.
• Temporary space conditioning, unless otherwise specified. • Repair or upgrade to existing building HVAC system and indoor air quality issues. • Temporary building heating or cooling.

Schedule 1
Johnson Controls, Inc. – Proprietary
© 2022 Johnson Controls, Inc. 17
• Resolution of existing design, service upgrades, and or distribution conditions known or unknown.

FIM 3: Spa Pool Cover
General
This FIM scope is to provide and place one (1) Customer selected blanket-style spa cover for the spa located next to the main pool. This spa cover will be placed on the spa during unoccupied times meaning no building occupants will have access to the spa while covered.

Demolition and Removal Work
There is not any demolition or removal work for this FIM because there is no existing spa cover.

New Installation Work
Furnish and install a new spa cover with the following specifications:
• Insulated floating spa cover.
• Approximately 85 sq ft.
• Ultra-spa cover from Lincoln Aquatics Item# 84-061 or equivalent. • Heavy duty “ultra” material with hemmed edges.
• Custom cut to the spa specification provided before the project notice to proceed has been executed.
• Material color: blue top and black bottom.

Inclusions and Exclusions
Inclusions
• Submittals including product specifications, warranty information, installation instructions, operating instructions, and maintenance instructions.

Exclusions
• No specific FIM exclusions.

Schedule 1
Johnson Controls, Inc. – Proprietary
© 2022 Johnson Controls, Inc. 18
FIM 4: Spa Booster Pump Timer
General
This FIM is to remove the existing jet booster spa pump on-off switch in the mechanical room and install a new spa user interface timer. To operate the new system, the spa user will engage the timer located on the wall next to the spa which in turn will start the spa jets pump. Timer duration will be specified by Crescent City Facilities Department. When the timer expires, and the spa’s jet booster pump will turn off.

The jet booster pump is not required for spa circulation.

Phase One – Complete Engineering Design after Signing this Contract Complete the following and provide stamped engineering drawings:
• Timer and material specifications.
• Timer and controls installation location.
• Electrical wiring one-line.

Phase Two – Implement Design
Demolition and Removal Work
• Remove the existing on-off switch from the mechanical room.

New Installation Work
• Install a new timer user interface, (final location determined by engineering final acceptance) • Install electrical system connection wiring to operate the user interface and spa jet pump per final engineered drawings.

Inclusions and Exclusions
Inclusions
• Submittals including drawings, product data, warranty information, installation instructions, operating instructions, and maintenance instructions.

Exclusions
• Repair or upgrades required to bring adjacent electrical, mechanical, and control systems up to code.
• Repair or replacement of defective mechanical, controls, and electrical equipment and electrical distribution system, except the equipment described in the Scope of Work (Defective equipment identified by JCI during implementation of the Scope of Work will be brought to the attention of the Customer).

Schedule 1
Johnson Controls, Inc. – Proprietary
© 2022 Johnson Controls, Inc. 19
FIM 5 & 6: Boiler and Spa Heater Replacements
General
The existing building and pool water are heated by two 2008 RayPak HHW boilers as listed in Table 5.

One boiler heats the pool water while the other is used solely for building heat. These boilers will be replaced with a skid-mounted single redundant boiler configuration that will supply HHW to heat the pool, spa, and building. This new “skid” design shall also eliminate the need for the existing 11 kW electric spa heater. The new boiler skid shall meet the following performance requirements:
• Main pool water temperature at 80°F.
• Spa water temperature at 104ºF.
• Pool area space at heating setpoint of 82°F.
• Raise the temperature of pool and spa water as follows:
 Increase pool temperature by 10°F within 12 hours while pool cover is on pool  Increase spa temperature by 10°F within 3 hours while spa cover is on spa • Boiler turn down shall be adequate to operate the HHW system to meet the lowest heating load during the time at the warmest outside temperature and the pool and spa covered with insulated blankets.

Table 5: Existing Heating Boilers
Boiler Qty Make Model #
Max Input per
Boiler (MBH)
Power
(V/phase/Amp) Boiler Efficiency
Pool Boiler 1 Raypak P-2072B 2,070 120V/1/15 80%
House Boiler 1 Raypak P-1532B 1,530 120V/1/15 80%
Demolition and Removal Work
• Disconnect existing house and pool boiler’s waterside piping as required for the new installation, including valves and pumps.
• Remove supply and return HHW piping back to demolition point of connection. • Remove existing boiler exhaust piping and venting.
• Remove propane gas lines back as needed for the new installation. • Remove from the site and dispose of the pool and house boiler per local and State regulations in effect at the time of contract signing.
• Disconnect, remove, and secure electrical connections for two (2) boiler circulation pumps: one 1 hp the other 1.5 hp.
• Disconnect, remove, and secure electrical connections from the existing pool and house boiler to the power panel or MCC unit.
• Disconnect and remove electrical feed connections from spa electric heater to spa electric heater power transformer.
• Remove 208V to 240V spa electric heater power transformer from wall. • Remove electrical feed wiring and conduit from the transformer to the power panel. • Remove the existing 11 kW spa heater.

Schedule 1
Johnson Controls, Inc. – Proprietary
© 2022 Johnson Controls, Inc. 20
• Dispose of 11 kW spa heater; the Customer has first right of refusal. • Remove starters and breakers, per engineering drawings, to install a new boiler skid one-point power connection breaker bucket in the existing motor control center.

New Installation Work
The following installation scope shall be performed based on the final design-build drawing package.

JCI provided boiler pump skid shall contain the following:
• Two (2) new Lochinvar boilers or equivalent sized as necessary to meet the calculated heating load during the design phase.
• Two (2) heating water building skid loop pumps sized during the design phase. • One (1) pool heating plate and frame heat exchanger sized during the design phase. • One (1) spa heating plate and frame heat exchanger sized during the design phase. • Two (2) piped in on skid control valves for controlling HHW to pool and spa heat exchangers.

Valve function type and location determined during the design phase. • Piping between boilers, pumps, and exchangers within the skid and not to any external connections to building systems.
• Isolation and bypass valves installed for equipment safety and maintenance. • Anchor points.
• Air expansion tank.
• Water makeup system.
• Closed system chemical treatment pot.
• Skid size to allow for building obstacle avoidance.
• Skid controls for boiler and valves that will control the temperature of spa and pool water while maintaining boiler minimum flow.
• VSD for HHW circulation pump to base on flow needed to maintain:
 Boiler output temperature
 Pool water temperature
 Spa water temperature
 Safety shutdowns
Installation of Boiler Skid:
• Receive and unload skid from the delivery truck upon delivery. • Store skid per manufacturer’s specification until installation. • Rig and place skid on existing mechanical room boiler housekeeping pad. • Anchor skid per manufacturer’s specification and compliant with local seismic regulations.

Remove crating materials used to ship skid to site.
• Provide piping and connect pool heating water piping from the pool heat exchanger connection point to the main pool return line per engineering drawings.

Schedule 1
Johnson Controls, Inc. – Proprietary
© 2022 Johnson Controls, Inc. 21
• Provide, route, and connect spa heating piping from the skid heat exchanger connection points to the main spa return line per engineering drawings.
• Provide piping to connect new house heating piping from existing piping demolition termination point to skid per engineering drawings.
• Provide new stainless steel venting and PVC combustion air vent pipe.  Use existing roof exhaust penetrations. Run new 6” stainless steel combustion exhaust air piping from boilers to exterior.
 Route and install 8” PVC combustion supply air venting pipe per manufacturer instructions. • Route and provide new propane gas line from existing building propane service line to boiler skid one-point connection.
• Provide new conductors and MCC breaker as needed for new the new boiler skid; one-point connection point.
 Install new conduit and conductor for one point connection to boiler skid.  Verify skid boiler motor pumps for correct rotation.
• Provide cold water makeup piping, backflow preventer and / or pressure reducing valve as required to boiler skid.
• Insulate new HHW lines with fiberglass insulation per title 24 and engineering drawings. • Startup:
 Provide and complete skid flushing of waterside per manufacturer recommendations.  Provide tooling and labor to ensure the system meets performance criteria. ▪ Meets manufacture pump flows
▪ Systems free of leakage
▪ Meets manufacture heating performance levels
▪ Meets performance heating as stated in the “general” section of this FIM’s scope of work
 Pool and spa heat exchanger will shut down if discharge water temperature exceeds 110 degrees.
 Flush HHW system per manufacturer recommendations.
 Fill the HHW side of the system with Customer-supplied chemicals to treat house water.

Inclusions and Exclusions
Inclusions
• Submittals including drawings, product data, warranty information, installation instructions, operating instructions, and maintenance instructions.
• Startup, checkout, and 4 hours of operations staff training.

Exclusions
• 3rd party water balancing of systems, unless specified in the scope of work. • Coil cleaning of existing systems.
• Chemicals for water treatment will be provided by the City. • Temporary space conditioning or temporary spa and pool heating.

Schedule 1
Johnson Controls, Inc. – Proprietary
© 2022 Johnson Controls, Inc. 22
• Insulation of existing piping that is not in scope of work. • Equipment pad repair or replacement.

FIM 7: Building Envelope
Engineering Design:

Provide complete engineering drawings outlining the detailed scoped envelope improvement. The final detailed scope will be determined after the signing of this contract. However, the following shall be included in the final design for building envelope improvement to maximize building performance.

Demolition and Removal Work
• Modify or cover up to four (4) boiler combustion louvers from mechanical north wall.  Other louvers scope of work are stated in FIM 7: Pool Dehumidifiers.

New Installation Work
The quantity and materials for the scope below to be determined based on final engineering. • Install additional insulation in the attic above the locker rooms and administration offices. • Close and seal penetrations with foam / drywall in attic knee wall. • Weather seal windows.
• Weather seal exterior doors.
• Weather seal (3) skylights.

Inclusions and Exclusions
Inclusions
• Submittals, product data, warranty information, installation instructions, operating instructions, and maintenance instructions.

Exclusions
• Repair or replacement of existing doors, windows, and hatches are excluded in this scope of work other than as described in the scope. If any doors, windows, or hatches are found to be inoperable or broken, JCI will report the deficiency to the Customer for repair or replacement prior to JCI retrofitting the seals.
• Insulation at the attic knee wall
• Repair or installation of any structural systems.
• Building structural upgrades.
• Fire stopping, smoke sealing, closure, and other hardware adjustments, paid escorts/access, incidental work, rotted substrate, inoperable hardware, broken parts or members, missing window gaskets or parts, spline ceilings, exterior scaffolding or swing stages, hard ceilings, touch up painting, cutting, and patching.
• Repair or upgrades required necessary to rectify existing code violations, including ADA and egress.

Schedule 1
Johnson Controls, Inc. – Proprietary
© 2022 Johnson Controls, Inc. 23
• Repair, installation, or replacement of brick or other masonry materials. • Repair or replacement of any windows, including any existing damaged frames or cracked glass.

If any glass or frames are found to be damaged, JCI will report the deficiency to the Customer for repair or replacement.
• Engineering services, studies, and analyses associated with any deficiencies of the existing HVAC systems.

General Inclusions, Clarifications, and Exclusions
The following items apply to all FIMs included in the project.

General Inclusions
• Submittals, including as-built drawings, product data, warranty information, installation instructions, operating instructions, and maintenance instructions, one hard copy version, and one electronic version.
• Manufacturer’s authorized startup and testing, and operator training as indicated in each FIM description.

General Clarifications
This project scope describes the work and services that JCI will provide to the Customer. Certain items are excluded from the scope of work and are itemized within this section. The following are general clarifications and exclusions which apply to all measures. In the event that these conditions require the inclusion of these items, the Customer and JCI agree to negotiate in good faith a fair and equitable solution.
• During the construction phase of the project there may be periods when it is not possible to maintain conditions in accordance with standard levels. Included are such issues as, but are not limited to temperature, air circulation, odor control, sound level, electrical service, etc. JCI and the Customer will coordinate activities to minimize the inconvenience to occupants. • Items indicated within Schedule 1 are subject to change during final engineering and design. • The scope and costs were developed using codes in effect as of April 2022. If any code modifications after that date necessitate changes in the scope, JCI will promptly notify the Customer and help develop a plan to mitigate or minimize the additional cost associated with those changes.
• The construction phase of this project is expected to coincide with the Water meter improvement project during the months of September thru October 2022 and as equipment lead times allow. • A change in the Scope will be treated as a Change Order as described in the Terms and Conditions of the Agreement.

General Exclusions
The following items are excluded from the scope of the work for this project:
• Any work not specifically delineated within this scope of work. • Permits, plan check fees, Inspector of Record (IOR) fees, laboratory or testing fees. • Warranty, repair, or replacement of existing equipment or systems which are defective, in disrepair, or not compliant with current codes (including, but not limited to, requirements of California Building Code, ADA, or Fire & Life Safety system requirements. JCI will identify the location of defective equipment and notify the Customer.

Schedule 1
Johnson Controls, Inc. – Proprietary
© 2022 Johnson Controls, Inc. 24
• Remedies for encounters with unforeseen/undocumented site conditions. • With the current unpredictable cost of construction equipment and materials, JCI reserves the right to review project costing if the contract and notice to proceed issuance extends past June 24, 2022 provided JCI has provided insurance certificates and payment and performance bonds.

If market conditions change due to unforeseen conditions, the parties intend to modify the scope of work, and related savings or schedule as necessary to match the Customer’s total expenditures, to the total amount of the Total Price for the Work. All modifications will be made via the Change Order process described herein.
• Overtime is not anticipated or included. Overtime work caused by unforeseen circumstances beyond the control of JCI, such as scheduling changes will be negotiated between the Customer and JCI.
• When documentation is not available that suspected areas are free of asbestos or other hazardous containing materials (ACMs) the Customer will be responsible for providing timely spot testing and abatement, as necessary, of the work area. The Customer is responsible if hazardous materials are encountered during the implementation phase, JCI will immediately stop work, take measures to reduce any contamination, and notify the Customer facility manager of the possible hazardous material condition and location. JCI will then request that the Customer remove and dispose of the hazardous materials prior to any continuation of work. Hazardous materials encountered during the ongoing service phase of the project will remain the property and disposal responsibility of the Customer. JCI will work with the Customer and their abatement personnel to identify the areas and implications of any required abatement such that the Customer can adequately plan for this requirement.
• Engineering services, studies, and analysis associated with any exclusions or work clearly outside of the scope definition.
• JCI does not anticipate or include any cost for unknown permits, fees, or processes required by local or oversight jurisdiction and/or utilities.
• JCI has not included any engineering, installation scope or cost for ADA or Path of Travel upgrades within this contract.
• Repair or replacement of defective mechanical, controls, and electrical equipment and the electrical distribution system, except the equipment described in the FIM description. JCI will identify the location of defective equipment and notify Customer personnel. • JCI does not anticipate or include building structural upgrades for this scope of work, unless otherwise specified or stated in the scope of work.
• Repair or replacement of any equipment not included in this scope of work. If defective systems or equipment is found defective, JCI will notify Customer personnel for resolution. • JCI does not anticipate or include the cost to repair or upgrade unknown mechanical or electrical code violations or systems deficiencies.
• Existing building ventilation conditions and indoor air quality issues other than what is included in the scope of work are excluded.
• Temporary power or space conditioning is not included unless otherwise specified. • Re-roofing scope of work is not included. (Sealing or patching of the existing roof where new penetrations are made is included as required.)
• Major electrical panel upgrades are not included outside the scope of work. • Resolution of an existing design, service, and or distribution conditions are known or unknown.

Schedule 1
Johnson Controls, Inc. – Proprietary
© 2022 Johnson Controls, Inc. 25
• Correction of any existing applicable building code violations and Federal ADA violations identified by JCI during the execution of the Work. Such violations will be brought to the attention of the Customer for remedy.
• Test and balance existing air HVAC systems unless otherwise noted in scope of work. • Duct cleaning.
• Repairs/replacement of insulation, piping, electrical, or ductwork found to be corroded or rusted or otherwise unacceptable for installation of components or fittings required for installation other than what is specified in the scope of work.
• Required electrical building upgrade service entry upgrade requirements. • Required propane building service entry upgrade requirements. • Electric service entrance upgrades to increase electrical power supply to the building. • Propane meter upgrades or modifications.
• Water meter upgrades or modifications.
• New piping line flushing before connecting to an existing system. • Pool or spa water chemicals to meet required pool and spa Health Department chemistry levels before or after project implementation.

Schedule 3
Johnson Controls, Inc. – Proprietary
© 2022 Johnson Controls, Inc. 26
Schedule 3 – Customer Responsibilities
In order for JCI to perform its obligations under this Agreement with respect to the Work the Customer shall be responsible for:

1. Providing JCI, its subcontractors, and its agents reasonable and safe access to all facilities and properties that are subject to the Work;

2. Providing for shut down and scheduling of affected locations during installation, including timely shutdowns;

3. Providing timely reviews and approvals of design submissions, proposed change orders, and other project documents;

4. Providing the following information with respect to the project and project site as soon as practicable following JCI’s request:
a. surveys describing the property, boundaries, topography, and reference points for use during construction, including existing service and utility lines; b. geotechnical studies describing subsurface conditions, and other surveys describing other latent or concealed physical conditions at the project site; c. temporary and permanent easements, zoning, and other requirements and encumbrances affecting land-use, or necessary to permit the proper design and construction of the project and enable JCI to perform the Work;
d. a legal description of the project site;
e. as-built and record drawings of any existing structures at the project site; and f. environmental studies, reports, and impact statements describing the environmental conditions, including hazardous conditions or materials, in existence at the project site. g. Provide JCI adequate space onsite for storage laydown area to accomplish work.

5. Securing and executing all necessary agreements with adjacent land or property owners that are necessary to enable JCI to perform the Work;

6. Providing all records relating to energy and/or water usage and related maintenance of the premises and relevant equipment requested by JCI;

7. Providing and maintaining a dedicated telephone line and/or TCP/IP remote connection to facilitate remote monitoring of relevant equipment;

8. Provide electrical transformer and power service entrance upgrades through the local electrical utility. JCI is not responsible for providing labor or material to upgrade the building service entrance power system.

9. Customer understands that pool and spa chemical use quantities can increase or decrease for standard per project to post project building system operations. JCI is not responsible for suppling or the cost of any chemical treatment for the swimming pool or spa.

10. If any equipment under control is changed out it is the responsibility of the Customer to move the controls and the controls programming to the new equipment.

11. Customer is responsible for the covering and removal of the spa cover.

12. The new fabric ductwork is being installed with a high MERV filter. It is recommended that when Customer replaces filters they meet this MERV rating of MERV-13.

13. Draining and filling of pool and spa or any associated moisture mitigations.

Schedule 4
Johnson Controls, Inc. – Proprietary
© 2022 Johnson Controls, Inc. 27
Schedule 4 – Price and Payment Terms
Customer shall make payments to JCI pursuant to this Schedule 4.

1. Compensation The price to be paid by Customer for the Work shall be $1,100,000.00

2. Payments (including payment for materials delivered to JCI and work performed on and offsite) shall be made to JCI as follows:

A payment of $100,000 for project development costs will be due upon the Customer issuing a Notice to Proceed. A payment of $110,000 for mobilization will be invoiced in accordance with Public Contract Code 10264..

Except in cases where unit prices form the basis for payment under the contract, JCI Contractor must, within 20 days of receipt of the notice to proceed, submit a breakdown of the contract price showing the value assigned to each part of the work including an allowance for profit and overhead. In submitting the breakdown, the Contractor certifies that it is not unbalanced and that the value assigned to each part of the work represents his estimate of the actual cost, including profit and overhead, of performing that part of the work. The breakdown must be sufficiently detailed to permit its use by the Construction Manager as one of the bases for evaluating requests for payment.

Monthly progress payment based upon percent of work completed as defined by the project schedule of values for work. Included in the work completed calculation, will be all costs for stored materials. JCI may provide invoices for the remaining payments on a monthly basis, and shall be based upon the percentage of work completed to date. Such invoices will be paid once the work is inspected to ensure the work is in compliance with and in furtherance of the Agreement, including the guarantees provided herein. Such inspection, approval and payment by the Customer with respect to each invoice shall be done within thirty (30) days of Customer’s receipt of such invoice. In the event that Customer raises an issue regarding the compliance of the Work, Customer shall pay all amounts that are not in dispute within such thirty (30) day period. Each Payment shall have 5% withheld for retention and will continue up to ninety-five percent (95%) percent of the total price. The final five (5%) percent shall be billed once the Final Notice of Completion is approved by the Customer.

Attachment 1
Johnson Controls, Inc. – Proprietary
© 2022 Johnson Controls, Inc. 28

NOTICE TO PROCEED
Johnson Controls, Inc.
103 Woodmere Rd. Suite 110
Folsom, CA 95630
ATTN: Russell Garcia
Re: Notice to Proceed for Fred Endert Municipal Pool Building Improvements (Crescent City) Dear Russell Garcia:

This Notice to Proceed is being issued by City of Crescent City (“Customer”) to Johnson Controls, Inc. (“JCI”) pursuant to that certain Contract entered into between Customer and JCI for the purpose of notifying JCI to commence work under such contract.

In the event that this Notice to Proceed is delivered by Customer prior to the execution of the Contract by Customer and JCI, Customer understands and expects JCI will incur significant costs and expenses in complying with this Notice to Proceed. In the event the Contract is not executed by the parties, for any reason, Customer agrees to pay JCI for its costs and fees incurred in complying with this Notice to Proceed on a time and material basis. Customer also agrees JCI shall be entitled to a reasonable markup thereon for profit and overhead. Customer agrees to pay amounts billed by JCI no later than five (5) days after Customer receives JCI’s payment application. JCI will continue to submit payment applications to Customer until the Contract is executed. Once the Contract is executed, JCI will begin submitting its payment applications to Customer in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth therein. Any amounts already paid by Customer will be credited towards the Contract price.

By signing and dating this Notice to Proceed, the parties hereto agree to these terms and represent and warrant they have the authority to execute this Notice to Proceed on behalf of their respective organizations.

CITY OF CRESCENT CITY
Signature:

Printed Name:

Title:

Date:

ACKNOWLEDGED & AGREED TO:

JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC.

Signature:

Printed Name:

Title:

Date:

Attachment 2
Johnson Controls, Inc. – Proprietary
© 2022 Johnson Controls, Inc. 29

CHANGE ORDER
Contract dated , 20 between Johnson Controls, Inc.
and Customer
Change Order No. Date (mo/day/yr)

Customer

CITY OF CRESCENT CITY
The above referenced Contract is hereby modified to the extent described below in accordance with the Terms and Conditions of the CHANGE ORDERS section thereof.

Scope of Work changed as follows:

Total amount of this Change Order $
Total Contract amount as revised by this Change Order $ The time for completion is: increased, decreased, unchanged.

The new completion date resulting from this Change Order is:
(mo, day, yr)

[
Unless specifically changed by this Change Order, all terms, conditions and provisions of the above referenced Contract remain unchanged and in full effect.

JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC. CUSTOMER
Signature: Signature:

Printed Name: Printed Name:

Title: Title:

Attachment 3
Johnson Controls, Inc. – Proprietary
© 2022 Johnson Controls, Inc. 30

CERTIFICATE OF SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION
PARTIES: JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC. (“JCI”)
103 Woodmere Rd. Suite 110
Folsom, CA 95630
ATTN: Russell Garcia
CITY OF CRESCENT CITY (Customer”)
377 J Street
Crescent City, CA 95531
PROJECT: Fred Ender Municipal Pool Building Improvements; Contract dated _____________ __, 2022 between JCI and Customer
By executing this Certificate of Substantial Completion, Customer acknowledges the following:
a. The work set forth in the Contract is substantially complete. b. Customer has received the manuals, warranty information, and training required under the Contract.
c. The following punch list items must be completed by JCI (check as applicable):
punch list attached
punch list complete
d. Upon completion of the punch list items, or if such punch list items are complete, JCI and Customer shall sign the Certificate of Final Completion attached hereto.

Dated , 20__.

CUSTOMER: JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC.

Signature: Signature:

Printed Name: Printed Name:

Title: Title:

Attachment 4
Johnson Controls, Inc. – Proprietary
© 2022 Johnson Controls, Inc. 31

CERTIFICATE OF FINAL COMPLETION
PARTIES: JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC. (“JCI”)
103 Woodmere Rd. Suite 110
Folsom, CA 95630
ATTN: Russell Garcia
CITY OF CRESCENT CITY (Customer”)
377 J Street
Crescent City, CA 95531
PROJECT: Fred Endert Municipal Pool Building Improvements; Contract dated _____________ __, 2022 between JCI and Customer
By executing this Certificate of Final Completion, Customer acknowledges the following:
a. The work set forth in the Contract has been reviewed and determined by Customer to be fully complete.
b. Customer accepts the work as complete and hereby releases JCI’s obligations under any performance and payment bonds posted for the project as of the date set forth below.

Dated , 20__.

CUSTOMER: JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC.

Signature: Signature:

Printed Name: Printed Name:

Title: Title:

Exhibit A
Johnson Controls, Inc. – Proprietary
© 2022 Johnson Controls, Inc. 32

PAYMENT BOND
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, THAT:

WHEREAS, the City of Crescent City, hereinafter designated the "Owner," has on _______________, 2022, awarded to Johnson Controls, Inc., hereinafter designated as the "Principal," a contract for the construction of the “Fred Endert Municipal Pool Building Improvements”; and
WHEREAS, said Principal is required to furnish a bond in connection and with said contract, providing that if said Principal, or any of his or its subcontractors, should fail to pay for any materials, provisions, or other supplies used in, upon, for, or about the performance of the work contracted to be done, or for any work or labor done thereon of any kind, the Surety of this bond will pay the same to the extent hereinafter set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, WE, the Principal, and _______________________________, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the Owner the penal sum of ______________________________ dollars ($________________) lawful money of the United States, for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, and successors, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.

THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that if said Principal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors, or assigns, should fail to pay for any materials, provisions, or other supplies used in, upon, for, or about the performance of the work contracted to be done, or for any work or labor thereon of any kind or for amount due under the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such work or labor, or for any amounts due, or to be withheld pursuant to Sections l8806 of the Revenue and Taxation Code of the State of California with respect to such work or labor, as required by the provisions of Chapter III, Division V, Title I, of the Government Code of the State of California, and provided that the persons, companies, or corporations so furnishing said materials, provisions, or other supplies, appliances, or power use, in, upon, for, or about the performance of the work contracted to be executed or performed, or any person who performs work or labor upon same, or any person who supplies both work and materials, thereto, have complied with the provisions of said Government Code, then said surety will pay the same in or to an amount not exceeding the amount hereinabove set forth, and also will pay in case suit is brought upon this bond, such reasonable attorney's fees to the Owner as fixed by the court.

This bond will inure to the benefit of any and all persons, companies, and corporations entitled to file claims under said Government Code, so as to give a right of action to them or their assigns in any suit brought upon this bond.

And the said Surety, for value received, hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration, or addition of the terms of the contract or to the work to be performed thereunder or the specifications accompanying the same will, in any way, affect its obligations of this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the terms of the contract or to the work or to the specifications. Said Surety hereby waives the provisions of Sections 2819 and 2845 of the Civil Code of the State of California.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the above bounden parties have executed this instrument under their seals this ____ day of _________________, 2022, the name and corporate seal of each Exhibit A
Johnson Controls, Inc. – Proprietary
© 2022 Johnson Controls, Inc. 33
corporate party being hereto affixed and these presents duly signed by its undersigned representative, pursuant to authority of its governing body.

Principal
(Seal)

Signature for Principal Title

Surety
(Seal)

Signature for Surety Title
Exhibit B
Johnson Controls, Inc. – Proprietary
© 2022 Johnson Controls, Inc. 34

FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, THAT:

WHEREAS, the City of Crescent City, California, a municipal corporation (hereinafter "Owner") and Johnson Controls, Inc. (hereinafter "Principal") have entered into an agreement dated ____________, 2022 for the construction of the “Fred Endert Municipal Pool Building Improvements” (hereinafter “Project”), which agreement is hereby incorporated by reference and made a part hereof; and
WHEREAS, said Principal is required under the terms of said agreement to furnish a bond for the faithful performance thereof.

NOW, THEREFORE, WE, the Principal, and , a corporation
organized and existing under the laws of the State of ________________ and duly authorized to transact business under the laws of the State of California, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the Owner, as obligee, in the penal sum of dollars
($_______________________), lawful money of the United States, said sum being not less than one hundred percent (100%) of the estimated amount payable by Owner under the terms of the Agreement for which payment well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators and successors, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.

THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH THAT, if the above bounden Principal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors, or assigns, must in all things stand to and abide by, and well and truly keep and faithfully perform the covenants, conditions, and agreements in the said contract and any alterations made as therein provided, on his or their part, to be kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein specified, and in all respects according to their true intent and meaning, and will indemnify and save harmless, the Owner, its officers and agents as therein stipulated, then this obligation will become null and void; otherwise it will remain in full force and virtue and Principal and Surety, in the event suit is brought on this bond, will pay to the Owner such reasonable attorney's fees and costs as fixed by the court.

As a condition precedent to the satisfactory completion of the said contract, the above obligation in the said amount will hold good for a period of one (l) year after the completion and acceptance of the said work, during which time if the above bounden Principal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns should fail to make full, complete, and satisfactory repair and replacements or totally protect the said Owner from loss or damage made evident during said period of one year from the date of acceptance of said work, and resulting from or caused by defective materials and/or faulty workmanship in the prosecution of the work done, the above obligation in the said amount will remain in full force and effect. However, anything in this paragraph to the contrary notwithstanding, the obligation of the Surety hereunder will continue so long as any obligation of the Principal remains.

And the said Surety, for value received, hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the terms of the contract or to the work to be performed thereunder or the specifications accompanying the same will, in any way, affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the terms of the contract or to the work or to the specifications. Said Surety hereby waives the provisions of Sections 2819 and 2845 of the Civil Code of the State of California.

Exhibit B
Johnson Controls, Inc. – Proprietary
© 2022 Johnson Controls, Inc. 35
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the above bounden parties have executed this instrument under their seals this day of , 2022, the name and corporate seal of each corporate party being hereto affixed, and these presents duly signed by its undersigned representative, pursuant to authority of its governing body.

Principal
(Seal)
Signature for Principal
Title of Signatory
Surety
(Seal)
Signature for Surety
Title of Signatory
Exhibit C
Johnson Controls, Inc. – Proprietary
© 2022 Johnson Controls, Inc. 36

ANTI-LOBBYING CERTIFICATION
The following certification and disclosure regarding payments to influence certain federal transactions are made per the provisions contained in 2 CFR 200 – Appendix II and 31 U.S.C. 1352, the “Byrd Anti‐Lobbying Amendment.”
(a) 2 CFR 200 – Appendix II, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards” is hereby incorporated by reference into this certification. (b) JCI, by signing the agreement, hereby certifies to the best of his or her knowledge and belief that:
(1) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress on his or her behalf in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement;
(2) If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds (including profit or fee received under a covered Federal transaction) have been paid, or will be paid, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress on his or her behalf in connection with this solicitation, the offeror shall complete and submit, with its offer, OMB standard form LLL, Disclosure of Lobbying Activities, to the Contracting Officer; and (3) He or she will include the language of this certification in all subcontract awards at any tier and require that all recipients of subcontract awards in excess of $150,000 shall certify and disclose accordingly.
(c) This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance is placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification and disclosure is a prerequisite for making or entering into this contract imposed by section 1352, title 31, United States Code. Any person making an expenditure prohibited under this provision or who fails to file or amend the disclosure form to be filed or amended by this provision, shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000, and not more than $100,000, for each such failure.

SIGNATURE:________________________________________________________ COMPANY NAME:____________________________________________ DATE: _____________________

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
TO: MAYOR GREENOUGH AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ERIC WIER, CITY MANAGER
BY: JON OLSON, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
DATE: JUNE 20, 2022
SUBJECT: POLICE STATION AND CITY HALL DESIGN CONTRACTS
______________________________________________________________________

RECOMMENDATION
• Hear staff report
• Technical questions from the Council
• Receive public comment
• Further Council discussion
• Approve and authorize the City Manager to sign Task Order 1 – Police Station Renovation Design with Calpo Hom & Dong Architects in the amount of $110,000 to complete the Plans, Specifications, and Engineer’s estimate of construction cost for renovation.
• Approve and authorize the City Manager to sign Task Order – New City Hall Renovation Design with Calpo Hom & Dong Architects in the amount of $155,000 to complete the Plans, Specifications, and Engineer’s estimate of construction cost for renovation.

BACKGROUND
A Request for Qualifications (RFQ) was published for Engineering, Planning, Environmental, Architectural, & Related Services on February 15, 2022. There were 12 responsive statements of qualifications. Staff recommended issuing contracts to all of the responsive consultants for on-call / as-needed services over the next five years, and on May 16, 2022 Council authorized the City Manager to sign the contracts upon approval of the City Attorney.

The City now has an executed professional services agreement with the firm and each project on which they are engaged will be detailed (scope, cost, timeline, etc.) in a task order. Individual task orders in excess of $60,000 must be brought to the City Council for approval.

Staff interviewed two architects for the Police Station and City Hall design projects. While both interviewed architects were well qualified, Calpo Hom & Dong Architects (CH&D) stood out as the best fit for the proposed projects. Dennis Dong’s direct experience with

POLICE DEPARTMENT & NEW CITY HALL DESIGN
JUNE 20, 2022
2 police stations, public works offices, and understanding of our budget constraints were impressive.

The goal of the designs is to achieve “shovel” or construction ready projects to better position the City to apply for future grants and/or to seek other funding for actual construction. The proposed work includes completing a programing analysis of the projects, preparation of complete construction documents (plans and specifications), and associated construction bidding assistance once funding is acquired. These documents are needed to demonstrate to granting agencies or other funding source that the City is ready to receive funds and move into the construction phase. As directed by the Council, staff will continue to seek funding for these projects until they are constructed. If grant funding is not available, staff will bring debt financing options to the Council for consideration.

ITEM ANALYSIS
TASK ORDER 1
The professional services proposed in Task Order 1 provide for a partial renovation plan for the City Police Station located at 686 G Street. The scope of services includes design of needed structural upgrades, new locker/shower room, storage, and parking improvements.

The rehabilitation of the Police Station will include exterior and interior improvements, addition of a locker room, parking area improvements, and required exterior accessibility improvements in the public right-of-way. Both the City Council and Measure S Oversight Committee previously expressed a need to renovate the Police Station. Design is anticipated to be complete by June 30, 2023.

See Task Order 1 for the full scope of services.

TASK ORDER 2
The professional services proposed in Task Order 2 provide for a renovation plan for the proposed new City Hall located at 240 H Street; formerly the Bank of America. The scope of services includes review of programming needs, revisions to previously proposed layouts, and general architectural services.

The rehabilitation of the new City Hall will include minor exterior improvements, needed interior improvements to achieve programming needs, and required exterior accessibility improvements in the public right-of-way. The City Council has previously expressed a desire to move into new City Hall. Design is anticipated to be complete by June 30, 2023.

See Task Order 2 for the full scope of services.

POLICE DEPARTMENT & NEW CITY HALL DESIGN
JUNE 20, 2022
3 FISCAL ANALYSIS
Task Order 1 (Police Station Renovation Design) is funded by Measure S. This funding allocation was partially funded from Fiscal Year 2021/ 2022, with the remaining funding allocated in this Fiscal Year (FY2022/23).

Task Order 2 (New City Hall Renovation Design) is funded by the General Fund.

Authorization to proceed will be provided upon approval of the Fiscal Year 2023 budget.

Task Order 1 – Police Station Renovation Design $ 110,000 Task Order 2 – New City Hall Renovation Design $ 155,000 Total $ 265,000

STRATEGIC PLAN ASSESSMENT
This action supports Strategic Plan goals …
GOAL 1: Support quality services, community safety, and health to enhance the quality of life and experience of our residents and visitors.

D. Provide and maintain an efficient, adequate infrastructure to provide for both current and future community needs
F. Incorporate health considerations into decision-making across departments and policy areas by:
• Encouraging and supporting community participation in the implementation of the Beachfront Park Master Plan through avenues such as the Beachfront Park Fund
GOAL 2: Promote a thriving local economy
A. Evaluate and optimize additional revenue sources
D. Collaborate with other jurisdictions and non-profits to maximize regional effectiveness and amplify funding opportunities
F. Plan and prepare for the growth and future needs of the Crescent City community by:
• Expanding on the success of grant funding by maximizing utilization of opportunities with corresponding community needs

ATTACHMENTS

1. Calpo Hom & Dong Architects Task Order 1 – Police Station Renovation Design

2. Calpo Hom & Dong Architects Task Order 2 – New City Hall Renovation Design Task Order # 1

Task Order to Master Agreement
CLIENT: City of Crescent City
MASTER AGREEMENT DATE: May 16, 2022
JOB NUMBER: Client # 1038 CH&D # 22089
SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED:

1. Client shall provide:

A. Available background and reference documents available for the existing structure and previous version of layout and design.

B. Other available documents as requested by the Consultant.

2. Consultant shall perform the following services:

A. Architectural and Engineering Services for the design of the renovation of an existing building for the new Crescent City City Hall Building.

1. Discovery: review existing building documentation and onsite building visitation to become familiar with the specifics of the existing building, including construction type, infrastructure, code restrictions, fire & life safety issues, security, etc.

2. Program: Review previous Program requirements and compare with current needs and predictions.

Meet with User Groups to update program to current needs.

3. Schematic Plans: develop schematic space layouts to meet program and building requirements.

Review with User Groups for approval.

4. Construction Documents: based on approved Schematic Plans, prepare full Construction Documents, for Building Permit Approval, and Public Bidding. Consultant will include: Mechanical Engineer, Electrical Engineer. A Structural Engineer will be retained on an as-need basis.

5. Bidding: Assist City during Bidding; prepare Bid Addenda, assist with assessing bids.

6. Construction Administration: Assist City with Construction Administration, including RFI responses, submittal review, change order review, payment application review.

COMPENSATION:

Client agrees to compensate Consultant as follows:

Time and materials in accordance with the 2022 Schedule of Charges in the Master Agreement Total fees to not exceed $155,000.00 without the express written authorization of Client.

CONDITIONS AND OTHER PROVISIONS:

This Task Order shall be made to the original Agreement between Client and Calpo Hom & Dong Architects on the date referenced above. All other conditions and provisions of Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

Task Order # 1

APPROVED
CLIENT: CONSULTANT:

BY:__________________________________ BY:____________________________________ NAME:_______________________________ NAME: Dennis Dong
TITLE:________________________________ TITLE: Vice President DATE:________________________________ DATE: June 15, 2022 [End of Task Order]
Task Order # 2

Task Order to Master Agreement
CLIENT: City of Crescent City
MASTER AGREEMENT DATE: May 16, 2022
JOB NUMBER: Client # 1039 CH&D # 22090
SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED:

1. Client shall provide:

A. Available background and reference documents available for the existing structure and previous version of layout and design.

B. Other available documents as requested by the Consultant.

2. Consultant shall perform the following services:

A. Architectural and Engineering Services for the design of the renovation and building addition to the existing Police Department Building.

1. Discovery: review existing building documentation and onsite building visitation to become familiar with the specifics of the existing building, including construction type, infrastructure, code restrictions, fire & life safety issues, security, etc.

2. Program: Review existing Program requirements and compare with current needs and predictions.

Meet with User Groups to update program to current needs.

3. Schematic Plans: develop schematic space layouts to meet program and building requirements.

Review with User Groups for approval.

4. Construction Documents: based on approved Schematic Plans, prepare full Construction Documents, for Building Permit Approval, and Public Bidding. Consultant will include: Structural Engineer, Mechanical Engineer, Electrical Engineer.

5. Bidding: Assist City during Bidding; prepare Bid Addenda, assist with assessing bids.

6. Construction Administration: Assist City with Construction Administration, including RFI responses, submittal review, change order review, payment application review.

COMPENSATION:

Client agrees to compensate Consultant as follows:

Time and materials in accordance with the 2022 Schedule of Charges in the Master Agreement Total fees to not exceed $110,000.00 without the express written authorization of Client.

CONDITIONS AND OTHER PROVISIONS:

This Task Order shall be made to the original Agreement between Client and Calpo Hom & Dong Architects on the date referenced above. All other conditions and provisions of Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

Task Order # 2

APPROVED
CLIENT: CONSULTANT:

BY:__________________________________ BY:____________________________________ NAME:_______________________________ NAME: Dennis Dong
TITLE:________________________________ TITLE: Vice President DATE:________________________________ DATE: June 15, 2022 [End of Task Order]

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
TO: MAYOR GREENOUGH AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ERIC WIER, CITY MANAGER
BY: JON OLSON, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

ANDREW LEIGHTON, ENGINEERING PROJECT MANAGER
DATE: JUNE 20, 2022
SUBJECT: SELECTION OF GREENWORKS, PC FOR DESIGN OF BEACHFRONT PARK MASTER PLAN PHASE 1

RECOMMENDATION
• Hear staff report
• Technical questions from the Council
• Receive public comment
• Further Council discussion
• Approve and authorize the City Manager to sign a professional services agreement with GreenWorks, PC for the design of the Beachfront Park Master Plan Phase 1
• Appoint two members of the Council to a Beachfront Park Master Plan Implementation Adhoc Committee

BACKGROUND
On August 16, 2019, the City Council authorized staff to apply for a Coastal Conservancy Grant for $90,000, and on October 17, 2019, the Conservancy approved application and awarded the City grant funds to update the Beachfront Park Master Plan.

On March 2, 2020, the City Council approved a contract with PGAdesign to complete the updated Beachfront Park Master Plan. City staff worked closely with the PGAdesign team to develop a comprehensive Beachfront Park Master Plan in order to have a competitive Prop. 68 grant application ready by March 12, 2021.

On January 14, 2021, PGAdesign and staff presented the final Beachfront Park Master Plan to the Planning Commission, which approved the plan and determined it to be exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

On February 2, 2021, staff presented the final Master Plan to the community with the cost estimates for the entire project and the specific break down per feature, key area and phases of larger amenities with the focus being to identify priority projects for the Prop.

BFPMP GREENWORKS, PC CONTRACT
JUNE 20, 2022
2 68 Statewide Park Development and Community Revitalization Program (SPP) grant application due March 12, 2021 for a total of $8.5 million.

On February 16, 2021, the City Council directed staff to apply for funds available from the Parks and Water Bond Act of 2018 (Proposition 68) that was placed on the ballot via Senate Bill 5 (DeLeon, Chapter 852, statutes of 2017), and approved by voters on June 5, 2018. Funds for the program were appropriated via State Budget item 3790-101- 6088(b), which states that $185,000,000 shall be available for the Local Park Rehabilitation, Creation in Urban Areas Program, consistent with subdivision (a) of Section 80061 of the Public Resources Code.

In December 2021, the City was notified that it was one of only approximately 100 applications to be awarded Statewide Park funding. That funding was in the amount of $5 million and allocated to the following projects:
• Park Entry at Stamps Way
• Bike Park - Pump Track
• Tolowa Cultural Interpretive Area with Indigenous Plantings • One Mile Class 1 Trail/Exercise Loop
• New ADA Playground
The City was also granted $177,952 in Per Capita funding, and the Council approved this allocation to fund the Paths of Culture project on the west side of the park adjacent to the pool and Tolowa Cultural Interpretive Area.

The Request for Qualifications was published on April 15, 2022 and closed for submission on May 16, 2022. Three proposals from prospective consultants were received. A consultant selection panel was made up of seven members comprised of the City Manager, Public Works Director, Economic Development and Recreation Director, an independent landscape architect, one member of the Tolowa Cultural Committee, City Attorney, and one member of the City Council. Thorough vetting of the submitted qualifications showed all three candidates to be very capable and all three were invited to interview on May 25, 2022.

ITEM ANALYSIS
The panel selected, by unanimous decision, GreenWorks, PC based upon five weighted criteria as outlined in the Request for Qualifications and their outstanding interview.

The GreenWorks, PC design team will include the following sub-consultants:

1. Abbaté Designs: Overall Project Lead & Landscape Architecture

2. Stover Engineering: Survey Work

3. Sea Reach: Tolowa Cultural and Interpretive Elements

4. Camas LLC: Permitting

5. KPFF Consulting Engineers: Structural Design

6. PAE: Electrical Design

BFPMP GREENWORKS, PC CONTRACT
JUNE 20, 2022
3 7. American Ramp Company / Velosolutions: Bike Park Pump Track The GreenWorks, PC proposed scope of work is summarized as follows:

1.0 General Development Plan

1.1 Perform Background Research

1.2 Conduct Site Visit, Site Analysis & Kickoff Meeting (Concurrent with Tasks 1.3 - 1.6)

1.3 Prepare for and Conduct Tribal Cultural Committee Meeting 1

1.4 Interview Key Staff at Pool, Cultural/Visitor Center

1.5 Prepare for and Conduct Community Listening Post Meeting

1.6 Conduct Full-Day Brainstorming Work Session

1.7 Conduct 2-Day Field Visit to Eugene, Silver Falls, Portland parks, and Sea Reach HQ

1.8 Develop Visitor Experiential Objectives

1.9 Draft General Development Plan Outline

1.10 Conduct Review Meeting with Project Team Including Budget Review- Videoconference

1.11 Prepare Park Development Theme Memo

1.12 Conduct Site Topographic Survey

1.13 Prepare Draft General Development Plan

1.14 Review Meeting with Client - videoconference

1.15 Prepare for and Conduct Tribal Cultural Committee Meeting 2 - video conference

1.16 Prepare Continued Functions and Order of Operations Plan for Phase 1

1.17 Finalize General Development Plan

2.0 Design Elements - Phase 1

2.1 Beachfront Park Phase 1 - 30% Plans, Specs, and Cost Estimate

2.2 Prepare Paths of Culture Interpretive and Preliminary Design

2.3 Prepare for and Conduct Tribal Cultural Committee Meeting 3

2.4 Conduct Public Meeting

2.5 Conduct Review Meeting with Project Team

2.6 Prepare for and Present to a Joint Planning Commission and City Council Meeting

2.7 Initial CEQA and CA Coastline Commission Permit Application Materials

2.8 Prepare Paths of Culture PSE

2.9 Provide Bidding and Construction Services for Paths of Culture

2.10 Beachfront Park Phase 1 - 60% Plans, Specs, and Cost Estimate

2.11 Prepare for and Conduct Tribal Cultural Committee Meeting 5 (Concurrent with Tasks 2.12 & 2.13)

2.12 Conduct Community Listening Post Meeting

2.13 Conduct Review Meeting with Project Team

2.14 Beachfront Park Phase 1 - 90% Plans, Specs, and Cost Estimate

2.15 Conduct Review Meeting with Project Team - Videoconference

2.16 Prepare Local Permits & Final CEQA Submittal

2.17 Conduct Review Meeting with Project Team - Videoconference

2.18 Beachfront Park Phase 1 - 100% Plans, Specs, and Cost Estimate

2.19 Provide Bidding Services for Phase 1

2.20 Provide Construction Services for Phase 1 - TBD
Mike Abbaté, the project lead, has over 35 years of professional experience, the majority of which has been focused on the design of public spaces. He has successfully led teams that have planned, designed, and helped build a wide variety of parks projects, including National, State and local parks. In addition, Mr. Abbaté was the Director of Portland Parks and Recreation for 7 years, during which the department received the Gold Medal from the National Recreation & Parks Association as the best-managed municipal park system in the country. As a former parks department director for local government, Mr. Abbaté understands the nuances of grant funded projects, planning for park maintenance as part of design, and effectively communicating with the public.

BFPMP GREENWORKS, PC CONTRACT
JUNE 20, 2022
4 The GreenWorks team was able to communicate an understanding of both the importance of this project to this community and the City’s vision of creating a shared space inclusive of a multitude of uses that can be enjoyed by everyone that lives and visits here; uses such as recreational opportunities, historical and cultural education and experiences, live entertainment, venues for large and small celebrations or gatherings, etc.

FISCAL ANALYSIS
There is no cash match required for the Prop. 68 SPP or Per Capita grants due to the City serving a “severely disadvantaged community” (median household income is less than 60% of the statewide average). This project will require significant staff time to work with the consultants throughout the design phase to deliver a project on time and within budget.

Revenue From Prop 68 SPP $5,000,000
Budget from Prop 68 SPP for Design $ 650,000
Available budget for Construction $4,350,000
Revenue From Prop 68 Per Capita $ 177,952
Budget from Prop 68 Per Capita for Design $ 30,000
Available budget for Construction $ 147,952
GreenWorks Proposal by Task Code
Task Code 1.0 $ 154,470
Task Code 2.0 without Paths of Culture $ 427,679
Reimbursable Expenses $ 38,000
Tolowa Engagement Stipend $ 10,000
Total $ 630,149 < $650,000
Task Code 2.2 Paths of Culture $ 28,080 < $ 30,000
Please note that this is a multi-year capital project and as such will be rolled forward from year to year.

STRATEGIC PLAN ASSESSMENT
GOAL 1: SUPPORT QUALITY SERVICES, COMMUNITY SAFETY, AND HEALTH TO

ENHANCE THE QUALITY OF LIFE AND EXPERIENCE OF OUR RESIDENTS AND

VISITORS
D. Provide and maintain an efficient, adequate infrastructure to provide for both current and future community needs
E. Target economic development improvements that provide additional benefit by enhancing the quality of life for residents

BFPMP GREENWORKS, PC CONTRACT
JUNE 20, 2022
5 F. Incorporate health considerations into decision-making across departments and policy areas by:
• Encouraging and supporting community participation in the implementation of the Beachfront Park Master Plan through avenues such as the Beachfront Park Fund • Examining methods to maintain, enhance, and expand park and recreation facilities GOAL 2: PROMOTE A THRIVING LOCAL ECONOMY
E. Create an environment that is conducive to attracting and retaining strong, sustainable businesses that reflect community needs and culture

ATTACHMENTS

1. GreenWorks Professional Services Agreement

2. GreenWorks Statement of Qualifications

CITY OF CRESCENT CITY

AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
This agreement for professional services ("Agreement") is hereby entered into this 20th day of, June, 2022, by and between the City of Crescent City, a California municipal corporation ("CITY") and, GreenWorks, an Oregon Corporation ("CONSULTANT").

WHEREAS, CITY has determined it is necessary and desirable to secure certain technical and professional services; and
WHEREAS, CITY released an RFQ to select the most qualified team to perform the services necessary to design and manage the implementation of Phase 1 of the Beachfront Park Master Plan; and
WHEREAS, CONSULTANT was selected as the most qualified consultant to provide such services.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED by and between CITY and CONSULTANT as follows:

1. INCORPORATION OF RECITALS. The recitals set forth above, and all defined terms set forth in such recitals and in the introductory paragraph preceding the recitals, are hereby incorporated into this Agreement as if set forth herein in full.

2. SCOPE OF SERVICES.

2.1. SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED. Subject to policy direction and approvals as CITY through its staff may determine from time to time, CONSULTANT will perform the services set forth in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. It is expressly understood that the Project has strict budgetary constraints as it is grantfunded. CONSULTANT is to design the Project to fit within the available budget by designing for a base bid with additive alternates. CONSULTANT will work with CITY to identify priorities for base bid and for the add alternates.

2.2. SCHEDULE FOR PERFORMANCE. CONSULTANT must perform the services identified in Exhibit “A” as expeditiously as is consistent with generally accepted standards of professional skill and care and the orderly progress of work. Target completion dates for key date sensitive tasks are set forth in Exhibit “B” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Adjustments to these dates may be made upon the mutual agreement of both parties. Other less date sensitive tasks will be completed according to CONSULTANT’S project schedule, which will be routinely updated and shared with City.

2.3. STANDARD OF QUALITY. All work performed by CONSULTANT under this Agreement must be in accordance with all applicable legal requirements and must meet the standard of quality using that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under similar conditions by professional consultants practicing in the same field at the same time in the same or similar locality (hereinafter the “Standard of Care”). No warranty, express or implied, is made or intended related to the professional services provided”. The Architect shall perform its services as expeditiously as is consistent with such professional skill and care and the orderly progress of the Project.

2.4. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS. CONSULTANT must comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, codes, ordinances, regulations, orders, and decrees.

CONSULTANT represents and warrants to CITY that CONSULTANT will, at its own cost and expense, keep in effect or obtain at all times during the term of this Agreement any licenses, permits, insurance and approvals that are legally required for CONSULTANT to practice its profession or are necessary and incident to the lawful prosecution of the services it performs under this Agreement, including a City business license.

2.5. PERSONNEL. CONSULTANT agrees to assign only competent personnel according to the reasonable and customary standards of training and experience in the relevant field to perform services pursuant to this Agreement. Failure to assign such competent personnel will constitute grounds for termination of this Agreement by CITY.

2.6. COMMENCEMENT OF SERVICES. CONSULTANT may not commence services until this Agreement has been fully executed and CONSULTANT has obtained all required licenses, insurance policies, and other authorizations required by this Agreement.

3. COMPENSATION.

3.1. SCHEDULE OF PAYMENT. The compensation to be paid by CITY to CONSULTANT for the services rendered hereunder will be in the not-to-exceed amount of six hundred sixty-nine thousand, seven hundred and thirty-nine dollars ($669,739.00) and based upon the rates and terms included in Exhibit “C” attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.

3.2. ADDITIONAL SERVICES. CITY will make no payment to CONSULTANT for any extra, further, or additional services unless such services and payment have been mutually agreed to and this Agreement has been formally amended in accordance with Section

7. 3.3. INVOICING AND PAYMENT. CONSULTANT must submit monthly invoices based on work completed for each grant (Statewide Parks Program or Per Capita). CITY will pay CONSULTANT within 30 days of receipt of CONSULTANT’s invoice. If there is a dispute as to one or more line items on the invoice, CITY will pay the undisputed portion within 30 days of receipt. The parties will exercise good faith and diligence in the resolution of any disputed invoice amounts and CITY will pay promptly upon resolution of the dispute. The City does not make advance payment for services.

CITY OF CRESCENT CITY
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT PAGE 2 OF 10

4. WORK PRODUCT REVIEW. CONSULTANT must make its work product available to CITY for review. If additional review and/or revision is required by CITY, CITY will conduct reviews in a timely manner, however, CONSULTANT must build review time into it schedule.

5. TERM OF AGREEMENT. This Agreement is effective as of the date first above written and will remain in effect until the work is completed, the Agreement is amended pursuant to Section 7 or terminated pursuant to Section 6.

6. EARLY TERMINATION.

6.1 FOR LACK OF FUNDS. If grant funding for this project is reduced or deleted by the State of California, then CITY may terminate this Agreement or reduce the scope of services and compensation to reflect the reduced grant award. In such circumstances, mutual agreement is not required. CITY must notify CONSULTANT as soon as practical.

6.2 FOR CONVENIENCE. CITY and CONSULTANT have the right to terminate this Agreement if CITY or CONSULTANT determines that it is in the best interest for the City or CONSULTANT to do so by serving upon the other party thirty (30) calendar days’ advance written notice of termination. The notice is to be delivered and addressed to City or CONSULTANT as set forth in Section 11 of this Agreement.

Except as expressly provided herein, neither CITY nor CONSULTANT will incur any liability by virtue of terminating for convenience.

6.3 FOR CAUSE. CITY or CONSULTANT may, by written notice of default to the other party terminate this
Agreement in whole or in part if City or CONSULTANT defaults in the performance of any of its material obligations under this Agreement and does not or cannot cure such default within ten (10) days of receipt of a notice of default.

6.4 DELIVERY OF WRITINGS. If CITY issues a notice of termination, CONSULTANT must deliver to CITY copies of all writings, whether or not completed, which were prepared by CONSULTANT, its employees, or its subcontractors, if any, pursuant to this Agreement. The term "writings" includes, but is not limited to, handwriting, typewriting, computer files and records, drawings, blueprints, printing, photostatting, photographs, and every other means of recording upon any tangible thing, any form of communication or representation, including letters, words, pictures, sounds, symbols, or combinations thereof.

6.5 PAYMENT FOR SERVICES RENDERED. If CITY issues a notice of termination for lack of funds or for convenience, CONSULTANT will be entitled to receive compensation in accordance with Exhibit “C” for all services rendered prior to the effective date of termination.

CITY OF CRESCENT CITY
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT PAGE 3 OF 10

6.6 EFFECT OF TERMINATION. Termination of this Agreement will not affect the rights and/or obligations of the parties that arose prior to termination and such rights and/or obligations will survive termination.

6.7 NOT EXCLUSIVE. The rights and remedies of CITY contained in this Section 6 are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or this Agreement.

7. AMENDMENTS. Modifications or amendments to the terms of this Agreement must be in writing and executed by both representatives of parties to be valid and enforceable.

8. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION. Except as required by law, CONSULTANT must not, either during or after the term of this Agreement, disclose to any third party any confidential information relative to the work of CITY without the prior written consent of CITY.

9. DISCLOSURE. CONSULTANT must provide CITY with full disclosure of any other clients that it is currently serving in Del Norte County, including a brief description of the nature of the work being performed. If CONSULTANT initiates service to new clients within Del Norte County during the term of this agreement, CONSULTANT must disclose such service to CITY.

10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. In the performance of the services in this Agreement, CONSULTANT is an independent contractor and is not an agent or employee of CITY.

CONSULTANT, its officers, employees, agents, and subcontractors, if any, have no power to bind or commit CITY to any decision or course of action, and must not represent to any person or business that they have such power. CONSULTANT has the right to exercise full control of the supervision of the services and over the employment, direction, compensation, and discharge of all persons assisting CONSULTANT in the performance of said service hereunder. CONSULTANT is solely responsible for all matters relating to the payment of its employees, including compliance with social security and income tax withholding, workers' compensation insurance, and all other regulations governing such matters.

11. NOTICE.

11.1 DELIVERY. Any notices or other communications to be given to either party under this Agreement must be in writing, delivered to the addresses set forth below, and will be effective, as follows:
(a) by personal delivery, effective upon receipt by the addressee; (b) by facsimile, effective upon receipt by the addressee, so long as a copy is provided by certified U.S. mail, return receipt requested, postmarked the same day as the facsimile;
(c) by certified U.S. mail, return receipt requested, effective 72 hours after deposit in the mail.

CITY OF CRESCENT CITY
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT PAGE 4 OF 10
IF TO CITY: IF TO CONSULTANT:

City of Crescent City GreenWorks

11.2 CHANGE OF ADDRESS. Either party may change its address for notices by complying with the notice procedures in this Section.

12. DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVES. CITY’S designated representative is Eric Wier, City Manager [[email protected]; 707-464-7483 ext. 232]. Consultant’s designated representative is Paul Agrimis, Principal [[email protected]; 503-222-5612]. Each party’s designated representative is authorized to sign addenda, change orders, or other modifications to this Agreement.

13. OWNERSHIP OF MATERIALS. Except for Consultant’s pre-existing property, CITY will, upon payment of CONSULTANT’S uncontested fees, become the owner of all records and information created, produced, or generated as part of the services performed under this Agreement. At any time during the term of this Agreement, at the request of CITY, CONSULTANT must deliver to CITY all writings, records, and information created or maintained pursuant to this Agreement. The term "writings" in this Section has the same definition as provided in Section 6.4. Reuse of work products by CITY for any purpose other than that intended under this agreement without written permission of CONSULTANT is strictly prohibited. City will Hold Harmless, Defend and Indemnify CONSULTANT against any and all claims that arise should City use work products for any other purpose without written permission from CONSULTANT.

14. BINDING AGREEMENT. This Agreement binds the successors of CITY and CONSULTANT in the same manner as if they were expressly named herein.

15. WAIVER. Waiver by either party of any default, breach, or condition precedent may not be construed as a waiver of any other default, breach, or condition precedent or any other right under this Agreement. The failure of either party at any time to require performance by the other party of any provision hereof will not affect in any way the right to require such performance at a later time.

16. NONDISCRIMINATION.

16.1 COMPLIANCE. CONSULTANT must comply with all federal and state antidiscrimination and civil rights laws. CONSULTANT must not discriminate in the conduct of the work under this Agreement against any employee, applicant for employment, or volunteer because of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, ancestry, sex, gender (including pregnancy, childbirth, breastfeeding or related medical conditions, gender identity, gender expression, age (40 and above), marital status, sexual orientation, denial of family and medical care leave, medical condition, genetic information, physical or mental disability (including HIV and AIDS), military or veteran status, denial of pregnancy disability leave or reasonable accommodation.

CITY OF CRESCENT CITY
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT PAGE 5 OF 10
Attn: City Manager
377 J Street
Crescent City, CA 95531
PH: (707) 464-7483 ext. 232
FX: (707) 465-1719
Attn: Paul Agrimis
110 SE Main St., Suite 100
Portland, OR 97214
PH: (503) 222-5612

16.2 POSTING. CONSULTANT must post in conspicuous places, available to all employees and applicants for employment, notices that CONSULTANT will provide an atmosphere for employees, clients, and volunteers that is free from harassment or discrimination on the bases set forth above.

17. INSURANCE.

17.1 REQUIRED COVERAGE. CONSULTANT, at its sole cost and expense, must obtain and maintain in full force and effect throughout the entire term of this Agreement the following described insurance coverage with insurers authorized to conduct business in the State of California and with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise approved by CITY.

17.2 ADDITIONAL INSURED STATUS. CITY, its elected and appointed officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds on the CGL policy with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of CONSULTANT including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations. General liability coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to the CONSULTANT’S insurance.

17.3 PRIMARY COVERAGE. For any claims related to this Project, the CONSULTANT'S insurance coverage will be primary insurance as respects CITY, its elected and appointed officials, employees, and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by CITY, its elected and appointed officials, employees, agents or volunteers will be in excess of the CONSULTANT'S insurance and will not contribute with it.

CITY OF CRESCENT CITY
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT PAGE 6 OF 10
(a) Workers' Compensation Per California Law
(b) Employer’s Liability $1,000,000 per accident for BI/Disease (d) Commercial General Liability
(e) Professional Liability (E&O) $1,000,000 each claim; (c) Automobile Liability

POLICY TYPE MINIMUM COVERAGE LIMITS
ISO Form # CA 0001
ISO Form # CG 00 01
$1,000,000 per accident for BI/PD, for
all owned, non-owned and hired
vehicles
$1,000,000 per occurrence for BI/PD,
products and completed operations,
personal and advertising injury;
$2,000,000 aggregate
$2,000,000 aggregate

17.4 NOTICE OF CANCELLATION. Each insurance policy required by this Agreement must be endorsed to state that coverage may not be cancelled except after giving CITY 30 days’ prior written notice to CITY.

17.5 WAIVER OF SUBROGATION. Consultant hereby grants CITY a waiver of any right to subrogation which any insurer of said Consultant may acquire against CITY by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance. Consultant agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not CITY has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer.

17.6 SELF-INSURED RETENTIONS. Self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by CITY. CITY may require CONSULTANT to provide proof of ability to pay losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses within the retention. The policy language must provide, or be endorsed to provide, that the selfinsured retention may be satisfied by either the named insured or CITY.

17.7 CLAIMS-MADE POLICIES. If any of the required policies provide coverage on a claims-made basis, then: (a) the retroactive date must be shown and must be before the commencement of work; (b) insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five (5) years after completion of the work; and (c) if coverage is canceled or non-renewed, and not replaced with another claimsmade policy form with a retroactive date prior to the commencement of work, then CONSULTANT must purchase “extended reporting” coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of the work.

17.8 VERIFICATION OF COVERAGE. CONSULTANT must provide with Certificates of Insurance for all required coverages as well as Declarations and applicable Endorsement Pages prior to commencement of work. However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the commencement of work will not operate to waive CONSULTANT’S obligation to provide them at any time thereafter when requested.

CITY reserves the right to demand complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements, required by the specifications, at any time.

17.9 SUBCONTRACTORS. CONSULTANT must require and verify that all subcontractors, if any, maintain insurance meeting all of the requirements stated herein.

CONSULTANT must ensure that CITY, its elected and appointed officials, employees, agents and volunteers are additional insureds on all policies as required herein.

17.10 LACK OF COVERAGE. In the event that any required policy is canceled prior to the completion of the Project and CONSULTANT does not furnish a new Certificate of Insurance prior to cancellation, CITY may obtain the required insurance and deduct the premium(s) from contract monies due to CONSULTANT.

CITY OF CRESCENT CITY
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT PAGE 7 OF 10

18. WORKERS' COMPENSATION.

18.1 COVENANT TO PROVIDE. CONSULTANT warrants that it is aware of the provisions of the California Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code. CONSULTANT further agrees that it will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work under this Agreement.

18.2 WAIVER OF SUBROGATION. CONSULTANT and CONSULTANT'S insurance company agree to waive all rights of subrogation against CITY, its elected or appointed officials, agents, and employees for losses paid under CONSULTANT'S workers’ compensation insurance policy which arise from the work performed by CONSULTANT for CITY.

19. GENERAL PROVISIONS.

19.1 INDEMNIFICATION. CONSULTANT agrees to indemnify and save harmless CITY, its elected and appointed officers, employees, and volunteers from claims and losses, accruing or resulting to any person or other legal entity who may be injured or damaged to the extent caused by CONSULTANT, it’s agents or employees negligence resulting in wrongful acts, errors and omissions, , pertaining to the performance of this Agreement. CONSULTANT’S liability arising out of the performance of its obligations hereunder will be limited to the fees paid by CITY to CONSULTANT for services contemplated by this Agreement. This liability limitation does not apply to claims made by any third party, nor does it apply in the event of the willful misconduct or gross negligence of CONSULTANT, its principals, employees or agents.

19.2 CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONSULTANT must exercise reasonable care and diligence to prevent any actions or conditions which could result in a conflict with CITY’s interest. CONSULTANT must immediately notify CITY of any and all violations of this Section upon becoming aware of such violation.

19.3 TIME OF THE ESSENCE. CONSULTANT understands and agrees that time is of the essence in the completion of the work and services described herein.

19.4 SEVERABILITY. If a court of competent jurisdiction or subsequent preemptive legislation holds or renders any of the provisions of this Agreement unenforceable or invalid, the validity and enforceability of the remaining provisions, or portions thereof, will not be affected.

CITY OF CRESCENT CITY
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT PAGE 8 OF 10

19.5 GOVERNING LAW AND CHOICE OF FORUM. This Agreement must be administered and interpreted under California law as written by both parties. Any litigation arising from this Agreement must be brought in the Superior Court of California, in and for Del Norte County.

19.6 COSTS AND ATTORNEYS' FEES. If either party commences any legal action against the other party arising out of this Agreement or the performance thereof, each party will pay its’ own litigation expenses, including court costs, expert witness fees, discovery expenses, and attorneys' fees.

19.7 NO ASSIGNMENT. This Agreement and any amendments hereto are not assignable by CONSULTANT either voluntarily or by operation of law without the prior written consent of CITY. Any attempt to assign this Agreement will be legally void.

19.8 SURVIVAL. The parties' obligations under Sections 8 [confidential information], 17.3 [primary coverage] and 19.1 [indemnification] will survive the termination or expiration of this Agreement.

19.9 INTEGRATION. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement of the parties and supersedes and prior negotiations, agreements, understandings, representations or statements.

20. INCORPORATION OF RFQ. The Request for Qualifications for Design Engineering and Construction Management Services of the Beachfront Park Master Plan Phase 1 (RFQ No. 2022-02) is hereby incorporated into this Agreement by reference and is attached hereto as Exhibit “D”. If there is any contradiction or inconsistency between this Agreement and the RFQ, this Agreement will govern.

21. AUTHORIZATION TO EXECUTE. The signatories to this Agreement hereby represent and warrant that they have been duly authorized to legally bind and execute this Agreement on behalf of their respective parties.
[signature page to follow]

CITY OF CRESCENT CITY
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT PAGE 9 OF 10
Executed by CITY and CONSULTANT on this 20th day of June, 2022 at Crescent City, California.

CITY OF CRESCENT CITY CONSULTANT
By: Eric Wier, City Manager By: Paul Agrimis, Principal Its:

ATTEST:

By:

Robin Patch, City Clerk Its:

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Martha D. Rice, City Attorney

EXHIBITS
The following exhibits are attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference:

Exhibit A- Scope of Services
Exhibit BExhibit CExhibit DSchedule
Compensation
Request for Qualifications

CITY OF CRESCENT CITY
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT PAGE 10 OF 10

•••••
••••
•••••

2022 2023 2024 2025

JUL SEP JAN MAR MAY JUL SEP JAN MAR MAY JUL SEP JAN MAR MAY

GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN
DESIGN ELEMENTS - PHASE 1

1.1 PERFORM BACKGROUND RESEARCH/EVALUATE MASTER PLAN
#1 1.2 CONDUCT SITE VISIT, SITE ANALYSIS & KICKOFF MEETING - MTG 1 #1
#1
#1
#2
#2
#2
# SITE VISIT
#3
#3
#3
#3
#4
#4
#4
# SITE VISIT

1.3 CONDUCT TRIBAL CULTURAL COMMITTEE MEETING - MTG 2

1.4 INTERVIEW KEY STAFF AT POOL, CULTURAL/VISIT. CTR, ETC. - MTG 3

1.5 CONDUCT FULL-DAY BRAINSTORMING WORK SESSION - MTG 4

1.6 CONDUCT 2-DAY FIELD VISIT

1.8 DRAFT GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN OUTLINE

1.9 CONDUCT REVIEW MEETING WITH PROJECT TEAM - MTG 5

1.10 PREPARE PARK DEVELOPMENT THEME MEMO

1.13 PREPARE FOR AND CONDUCT TRIBAL CULTURAL COMMITTEE MEETING 2 - MTG 7

2.1 DEVELOP PARK PS&E - 30%

1.11 CONDUCT SITE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY

1.14 CONDUCT REVIEW MEETING WITH PROJECT TEAM - MTG 8

2.2 PREPARE PATHS OF CULTURE INTERPRETIVE & PRELIM. DESIGN

1.12 PREPARE FOR AND CONDUCT COMMUNITY LISTENING POST MEETING - MTG 6

1.15 PREPARE DRAFT GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN

1.17 CONDUCT REVIEW MEETING WITH PROJECT TEAM - MTG 9

OOPS - HOLD FOR CRESCENT CITY REVIEW

2.4 CONDUCT PUBLIC INPUT MEETING 2 - MTG 11

1.16 PREPARE CONTINUED FUNCTIONS AND ORDER OF OPERATIONS PLAN FOR PHASE 1

1.18 FINALIZE GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN

2.3 CONDUCT TRIBAL CULTURAL COMMITTEE MEETING 3 - MTG 10

2.5 CONDUCT REVIEW MEETING - MTG 12

2.6 PRESENT TO JOINT PLANNING COMM./CITY COUNCIL MTG - MTG 13

HOLD FOR CRESCENT CITY REVIEW

2.11 CONDUCT TRIBAL CULTURAL COMMITTEE MEETING 4 - MTG 14

2.12 CONDUCT COMMUNITY LISTENING POST MEETING 2 - MTG 15

2.13 CONDUCT REVIEW MEETING - MTG 16

HOLD FOR CRESCENT CITY REVIEW

2.15 CONDUCT REVIEW MEETING OOPS - MTG 17

2.17 CONDUCT REVIEW MEETING - MTG 18

2.16 FINALIZE CEQA AND OTHER PERMITS, CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL

2.7 PREPARE CEQA AND COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATIONS

2.10 DEVELOP PARK PS&E - 60%

2.14 DEVELOP PARK PS&E - 90%

2.8 PREPARE PATHS OF CULTURE PSE

2.9 PROVIDE BIDDING & CONSTRUCTION SERVICES FOR PATHS OF CULTURE

2.18 PREPARE PHASE 1-STAGE 2 FINAL PS&E

2.19 PROVIDE BIDDING SERVICES PHASE 1

2.20 PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES -TBD

1.7 DEVELOP VISITOR EXPERIENTIAL OBJECTIVES

AUG OCT NOV DEC FEB APR JUN AUG OCT NOV DEC FEB APR JUN AUG OCT NOV DEC FEB APR JUN Beachfront Park Master Plan - Phase 1
City of Crescent City
June 13, 2022
TASK Abbate'
Designs
Role:

Paul Agrimis
Principal in
Charge
Ben Johnson
Stamping
Professional
Ron Tendick
QA/QC
Rebecca
Shepard
Landscape
Designer
Madeline
Gambino Admin
Assistant
Mike Abbate'
Overall Lead
Ward Stover Civil
Engineer &
Surveyor
Assistant
Engineer
Sr Engineering
Tech
Survey Crew (2
Man) Admin Asst Susan Jurasz Design Director Sr. Designer Industrial designer Matt Robart
Environmental &
Regulatory Lead Alex Wolk
Craig Totten
Principal Structural
Engineer
Stuart Finney
Structural Engineer PE CAD
Robert Mills Lead
Electrical & Lighting
Engineer Staff Engineer Drafting PC/PM Assistant Design Manager Megan Bradley Bike
Facilities Designer Design Engineer Design Coordinator
Labor Cost by Task
Hourly Rate: Hours ($180/hr) Hours ($145/hr) Hours ($155/hr) Hours ($100/hr) Hours ($115/hr) Hours ($210/hr) Hours ($152/hr) Hours ($110/hr) Hours ($110/hr) Hours ($410/hr) Hours ($80/hr) Hours ($95/hr) Hours ($95/hr) Hours ($95/hr) Hours ($95/hr) Hours ($167/hr) Hours ($167/hr) Hours ($250/hr) Hours ($200/hr) Hours ($145/hr) Hours ($130/hr) Hours ($260/hr) Hours ($190/hr) Hours ($125/hr) Hours ($115/hr) Hours ($120/hr) Hours ($110/hr) Hours ($110/hr) Hours ($100/hr)

1.0 General Development Plan 96 108 6 218 40 194 56 36 40 60 2 78 76 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 2 10 0 0 4 8 0 6 $162,720 78 1.1 Perform Background Research 8 4 16 8 20 4 8 8 2 2 2 124

1.2 Conduct Site Visit, Site Analysis & Kickoff Meeting (Concurrent with Tasks 1.3 - 1.5) 12 12 20 12 8 24 32 4 1 8 8 2 30 1.3 Prepare for and Conduct Tribal Cultural Committee Meeting 1 4 8 8 2 8
20 1.4 Interview Key Staff at Pool, Cultural/Visitor Center 4 4 4 8 40 1.5 Conduct Full-Day Brainstorming Work Session 8 8 8 8 8 98 1.6 Conduct 2-Day Field Visit to Sea Reach HQ, Silver Falls, Salem/Independence, Portland parks 16 16 16 2 16 16 16 40 1.7 Develop Visitor Experiential Objectives 2 2 12 8 16 68 1.8 Draft General Development Plan Outline 2 2 40 4 16 4 16 1.9 Conduct Review Meeting with Project Team Including Budget Review- Videoconference 2 2 2 2 4 2 2 1 2 2 2
52 1.10 Prepare Park Development Theme Memo 2 2 8 4 12 8 16 122 1.11 Conduct Site Topographic Survey 2 4 8 8 40 60
98 1.12 Prepare for and Conduct Community Listening Post Meeting (Concurrent with Tasks 1.13 & 1.14) 20 20 32 2 24 28 1.13 Prepare for and Conduct Tribal Cultural Committee Meeting 2 4 4 8 4 8
8 1.14 Review Meeting with Client 2 2 2 2
66 1.15 Prepare Draft General Development Plan 4 8 4 24 2 12 4 8 42 1.16 Prepare Continued Functions and Order of
Operations Plan for Phase 1 2 8 8 2 12 4 4 2
16 1.17 Review Meeting with Client - videoconference 2 2 2 4 4 2 70 1.18 Finalize General Development Plan 2 4 20 4 12 4 8 4 12

2.0 Design Elements - Phase 1 150 356 80 1076 62 340 94 328 0 0 0 60 76 136 48 92 116 4 32 48 32 17 76 32 35 12 56 116 16 $460,019 453

2.1 Beachfront Park Phase 1 - 30% Plans, Specs, and
Cost Estimate 32 60 16 160 4 48 8 40 16 16 24 1 20 8 3 24 3 2 28 28 8 208

2.2 Prepare Paths of Culture Interpretive and Preliminary Design 12 16 80 40 4 8 8 8 16 8 8
46 2.3 Prepare for and Conduct Tribal Cultural Committee Meeting 3 4 4 24 4 8 2
48 2.4 Conduct Public Meeting 4 4 24 4 8 4 8
18 2.5 Conduct Review Meeting with Project Team 2 2 2 2 8 2 1 2 2 2 100

2.6 Prepare for and Present to a Joint Planning
Commission and City Council Meeting 32 32 4 32
174

2.7 Initial CEQA and CA Coastline Commission Permit
Application Materials 2 16 8 4 64 80
324 2.8 Prepare Paths of Culture PSE 8 60 16 80 4 24 8 60 8 16 40 142

2.9 Provide Bidding and Construction Services for Paths of Culture 2 8 24 4 12 8 40 8 8 8 20
494

2.10 Beachfront Park Phase 1 - 60% Plans, Specs, and
Cost Estimate 16 60 16 200 4 32 16 60 8 16 20 16 2 4 12 12 2 8 12 4 2 8 40 2 48 2.11 Prepare for and Conduct Tribal Cultural Committee Meeting 4 (Concurrent with Tasks 2.12 & 2.13) 4 4 24 4 12 64 2.12 Conduct Community Listening Post Meeting 8 8 40 8 18 2.13 Conduct Review Meeting with Project Team 2 2 2 2 8 2 1 2 476

2.14 Beachfront Park Phase 1 - 90% Plans, Specs, and
Cost Estimate 32 54 16 200 8 32 12 60 8 8 20 8 2 8 8 2 8 12 4 2 28 2 18 2.15 Conduct Review Meeting with Project Team -
Videoconference 2 2 2 2 8 2 1 2
124 2.16 Prepare Local Permits & Final CEQA Submittal 8 4 40 4 16 4 20 28 18 2.17 Conduct Review Meeting with Project Team -
Videoconference 2 2 2 2 8 2 1 2 2 2
311

2.18 Beachfront Park Phase 1 - 100% Plans, Specs, and
Cost Estimate 8 32 16 120 8 24 12 60 4 4 8 4 1 2 4 4 2 4 8 4 2 8 20 4 46 2.19 Provide Bidding Services for Phase 1 2 2 4 2 4 4 4 24 4 24 20

2.20 Provide Construction Services for Phase 1 - TBD
Individual Totals (hours) 246 464 86 1294 102 534 150 364 40 60 2 138 152 136 48 96 116 4 34 48 32 19 86 32 35 16 64 116 22 Firm Totals (cost) $266,020.00 $112,140.00 $92,000.00 $45,030.00 $35,404.00 $18,920.00 $29,305.00 $23,920.00 Reimbursable Expenses (Travel, Lodging, Meals, Meeting Materials) $20,000.00 $5,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,400.00 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 $3,000.00 $2,200.00 Tolowa Engagement Stipend $10,000.00
Consultant Total Fee $296,020.00 $117,140.00 $94,000.00 $47,430.00 $36,604.00 $20,120.00 $32,305.00 $26,120.00 TOTAL FEE $669,739.00
GreenWorks, PC Stover Engineering Sea Reach Camas KPFF PAE American Ramp Company/Velosolutions n
City of Crescent City, California
Public Works Department
377 J Street
Crescent City, CA 95531
(707) 464-9506
__________________________________________________________ Request for Qualifications
To Provide
Final Planning, Design, Engineering and Construction
Management Services
For The 2021
Beachfront Park Master Plan Phase 1 (Conformed)
RFQ NUMBER 2022-02
REGISTRATION DEADLINE: April 28, 2022
SUBMISSION DEADLINE: May 16, 2022 by 4:00 p.m.
2 CITY OF CRESCENT CITY

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS TO PROVIDE FINAL PLANNING, DESIGN,

ENGINEERING, AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES
FOR THE 2021 BEACHFRONT PARK MASTER PLAN PHASE 1
I. INTRODUCTION
The City of Crescent City, California, (“City”) is requesting statements of qualifications (SOQ) that will lead to the selection of a qualified consultant or consultant team that will provide final planning, design, engineering, permitting, bidding support, and construction management services for Phase 1 of the 2021 Beachfront Park Master Plan (“Project”).

This Request for Qualifications (RFQ) describes the scope of services, consultant selection process, and mandatory information that must be included in response to this RFQ.

The RFQ process is intended to establish the most qualified Consultant(s) who will then enter into a professional services agreement (“Contract”), the form of which is included as Attachment

1. The Contract will include services required to complete the scope of work identified within this RFQ for the City’s awarded prop 68 Statewide and Per Capita grant projects. Contract compensation will be based upon time and material with a maximum negotiated not-to-exceed price.

As additional funds are granted or allocated to expand the Project, then the Consultant’s scope of services may increase to include additional Beachfront Park Master Plan elements. The City currently has two such grant applications submitted. One for the design and construction of an amphitheater and waterfront plaza and the other to enhance the Tolowa Cultural Interpretive Area experience. Although this work is not yet funded, the consultant’s proposal should also include a project approach and a design team capable of planning for and designing these features. This work will be considered phase 2 of the project and should not be included in the cost proposal. If the City is awarded funding, the fees for this phase will be negotiated at a later date.

II. BACKGROUND
Crescent City is located in Del Norte County along the Northern California Coast approximately 15 miles south of the Oregon border. The town is a popular stopping point for tourists driving along the northern California Coast or visiting the Smith River National Recreational Area or the Redwood National and State Parks. It is also a popular commercial and recreational fishing area. Besides tourism, major industries in the region include agriculture, timber, fishing, local government, healthcare and the Pelican Bay State Prison. Crescent City is the county seat and only incorporated city in Del Norte County. 3 The principal north-south route through Del Norte County is US Highway 101, which provides access to coastal towns and cities to the north and south. Del Norte County has two main routes providing access to inland communities: SR 197/US Highway 199 to Hiouchi and Gasquet, and Route 169 to Klamath Glen. SR 197/US Highway 199 connects US Highway 101 to Interstate 5 in Oregon.

Del Norte County's diverse geography includes inland mountain ranges of coniferous forests, low coastal mountain ranges with temperate forests and rugged coastlines with gray sand beaches meeting the Pacific Ocean. The climate is consistently mild along the coast, becoming more variable inland. In Crescent City and along the coastal fringe, there is minimal temperature fluctuation. Coastal daytime temperatures average 45-55 degrees during winter months.

Temperatures increase to 55-65 degrees during mid-summer and early fall months, with higher temperatures when coastal fog disperses. Inland, temperature differences are more marked. Del Norte County/Crescent City area’s annual rainfall generally ranges between 50 - 60 inches, with the heaviest rainfall occurring from November through March.

The mission of the City of Crescent City is to promote high quality leadership, services, and life to our residents, businesses, and visitors by providing efficient, innovative, and economically sound municipal services.

The City owns and operates many municipal facilities, which include a wastewater treatment plant, sewer collection facilities, water distribution facilities including water tanks, elevated water tanks and water pumps, a public swimming pool, fire station, police station, Housing Authority, a Public Works service yard and an administrative office facility.

III. SCOPE OF WORK
A. BEACHFRONT PARK MASTERPLAN BACKGROUND
In 2020, the City retained PGA design to perform a Beachfront Park Master Plan (BFPMP) update. The conceptual Master Plan was completed in 2021. There was significant public participation in selecting the final park conceptual Master Plan and project prioritization. As Beachfront Park is over 35 acres and includes multiple amenities full implementation is expected to occur over multiple phases. This RFQ is seeking to complete a general development plan of the park including an interpretive plan and complete the design of Phase 1 of the BFPMP. The Beachfront Park Master Plan is included as Attachment 2.

B. SCOPE OF BEACHFRONT PARK MASTER PLAN PHASE 1
Phase 1 implementation of the Beachfront Park Master Plan (the Project) includes the following:

All work should include design features that incorporate the natural beauty of the area while also addressing the natural elements that are present. These elements include maintenance 4 considerations for the marine environment, strong winter storms, heavy rain, visibility for public safety concerns, and northwest summer winds which can make the area unusable if not addressed. To maximize the functionality, the consultant team will evaluate each amenity for its ability to function as a multiuse year round facility.

1. General Development Plan
Crescent City is located on the ancestral lands of the Tolowa People, along the Wild Rivers coast and uniquely situated adjacent to old growth redwoods, the Pacific Ocean, the wild and scenic Smith River. As this is the first phase of the new Beachfront Park Master Plan to be implemented, it will set the theme, style, and signage of the amenities throughout the park.

Consultant must demonstrate an understanding of the area and a vision to be able to convey this sense of place in all the features to be designed. This park should be an experiential journey for all who visit and should accentuate the natural beauty of the area.

Consultant will develop a General Development Plan (GDP) that will be the foundation for the future phases. This plan will evaluate the various proposed amenities to ensure continuity.

Incorporated within the GDP should be an interpretive plan that includes the overall vision of the park focusing around the cultural, natural resources, and park setting that defines the sense of place. The plan should include at a minimum: a storyline for the users anticipated experiential journey throughout the park; signage plan; and family of site details with a common thread between amenities.

The intent regarding the General Development Plan is for the consultant to take a moment, before the actual engineering design of Phase 1 amenities begin, to evaluate the conceptual park master plan, evaluate proposed amenities in the various phases, how they are orientated to each other, overall traffic flow between them (transit, pedestrian, vehicle), and their capability for multiuse functionality.

The Interpretive Plan should layout the intended experience of the user as they make their way through the park. This plan should evaluate the user’s experience as they are coming into the area from all aspects (pedestrian, bicycle, vehicle, etc.) and from all entry points. A successful project would be one that truly captures the essence (Natural Resources, History, Community) of the area.

2. General Master Plan Conflict Resolution
Only select portions of the Beachfront Park Master Plan will be fully designed in Phase 1.

Consultant will be required to review the complete master plan so that the work to be designed and constructed in Phase 1 will not conflict with future phases of the Beachfront Park Master Plan implementation or other currently planned projects such as the Front Street Plan especially the secondary storm drain outfall (Attachment 3), the Front Street Master Plan (Attachment 4), of-the Northcoast Marine Mammal Center Coastal Development Permit 5 (Attachment 5), or the 8’x7’ tile mural commemorating the Kamome boat which is integrated with the sister city relationship between Crescent City and Rikuzentakata. The mural needs to be immersed in the design physically and historically.

Consultant must also work to ensure continued function of existing park areas, facilities, disk golf, and adjacent features that are not included in Phase 1 but that could be impacted by Phase 1 implementation activities. Facilities such as the pool and Cultural/Visitor Center must be able to continue to receive deliveries and supplies, which may include heavy truck traffic to areas shown as unpaved in the BFPMP. Consultant must interview key staff, to be selected by the City team, at the various facilities to maximize Consultant’s understanding of each facility’s needs and uses. The City also envisions maintaining existing streets and walks in their current configurations to the extent practicable.

Consultant must work to minimize the need for reworking of utilities (power, water, sewer, drainage, storm drains, communications etc.) in future phases by anticipating future needs of the fully built-out Beachfront Park Master Plan. This may require upgrades to current infrastructure and utilities.

Consultant must include a comprehensive site survey as part of the Master Plan conflict resolution.

Consultant will also develop a proposed order of operations for Phase 1 and future phases of the Beachfront Park Master Plan with a goal of minimizing spatial and timing conflicts.

3. Design Elements – Phase 1
These elements are funded through Prop 68, Per Capita, and Statewide Parks Program grants already awarded to the City.

3.1 Park Entry at Stamps Way
The Beachfront Park entry at Stamps Way will include gateway features and signage. Consultant will develop a plan that includes English and Tolowa language signage in coordination with a cultural committee established by the City. The consultant will also be tasked with developing an overall signage plan including sign styles and theme to be incorporated in the funded amenities in Phase 1 as well as future amenities identified in the Master Plan.

3.2 Bike Park - Pump Track
The bike park will consist of paved pump tracks for intermediate and advanced riders, safety signage and fencing to discourage unsafe use after dusk. The feature is positioned at the southwest portion of the park along the California Coastal Trail but within close access to residential housing for easy commute for families and riders of all ages.

The bike park will also include seating areas and is located close to existing bathrooms and picnic areas along the waterfront to provide families the amenities they would need to 6 be able to spend longer amounts of time at the park. The location is also positioned close to the multi-use sport fields to allow parents and other adults the opportunity to have multiple youth engaging in separate activities close to each other.

A conceptual plan was developed for this feature by Trail Labs as shown below.

The final design should generally follow the conceptual plan shown below, but also be designed with a fixed budget in mind.

3.3 Tolowa Cultural Interpretive Area with Indigenous Plantings The Tolowa Cultural Interpretative Area with Indigenous Plantings will include informational displays regarding the “living culture” of the Tolowa people, their history until today, stewardship of lands and vision for future generations. This historical information will begin with carbon dating information going back 12,000 years and will include an account of the events of the early 1850s, including the second largest massacre recorded on American soil and Tolowa resiliency through trauma and repression. Displays will also celebrate the success and important values of the Tolowa people and encourage visitors and residents to be good stewards of the park, which was once part of the area identified by the Tolowa as Taa-‘at-dvn.

Tribal designs will be stamped into the pathways and added to various features in this area.
7 The Consultant will work with a cultural committee to finalize the design of this feature.

3.4 One Mile Class 1 Trail/Exercise Loop
This low risk, well-marked trail will allow residents and visitors to safely walk on a well-lit, one-mile loop with informational stops and accompanying exercise stations.

Exercise stations along the loop will introduce residents to healthy exercises and safe stretching to increase overall wellness for beginners and reminders for experienced athletes alike. Bollard lighting, signage and striping throughout the loop will create a safe environment for residents of all ages and abilities to exercise. The City does not plan to install the lighting in the construction of Phase 1 but it must be designed and incorporated so that it may be fully installed at a later date when funding is available.

This feature will maximize the use of the existing trails and walks and complete the needed connections to realize the vision presented in the master plan. The loop trail should be identified in a way that distinguishes it from other trails.

3.5 New ADA Playground
This ADA-compliant playground will be located beside the existing play area that is a community favorite (“Kidtown”). Components of the playground will include accessible pathways and ground surfaces, sensory play areas, varying climbing opportunities, and lighting.

The current playground was built in 1999 and at the time was a quality playground.

Since then, playgrounds, play features and overall access are being developed and designed in ways that provide opportunities for children with a broader spectrum of abilities and recreational needs. The City recently installed a wheelchair swing and is eager to develop an area of the park that will provide recreational opportunities for children of all abilities. The ADA playground will consist of approximately 20,000 square feet.

3.6 Paths of Culture
The Paths of Culture element will be a path of Tolowa patterned walks and interpretive signage in English and Tolowa linking the cultural elements in the park. It will connect the Tolowa Cultural Interpretive Area with the area adjacent to it, which will house other historical memorials and commemorative pieces. Stories of the City’s first settlers, the 1964 Tsunami (which killed eleven people and devastated 29 city blocks), the S.S.

Emidio (a piece of a World War II submarine which washed ashore), and the City’s Sister City relationship with Rikuzentakata, Japan are some of the stories that will be told in this area, highlighting even more of the unique culture that Crescent City has to offer.

The Paths of Culture will be co-located with a modified disk golf configuration. The design must incorporate the new disk golf elements in the vicinity. 8 4. Design Elements – Phase 2
These elements are not yet funded, but the City has applied for grants. If the City is successful in obtaining funding, then the selected consultants will be engaged through a contract amendment.

4.1 Outdoor Amphitheater (Prop 68 Rural Recreation and Tourism Grant Application)
The outdoor amphitheater will be a performing arts space with a sloping, grassy seating area situated close to disabled parking, which thoughtfully incorporates ADA access and seating into the design. This feature will include lighting to and from parking areas for safety during evening events and vendor hookups to accommodate additional services during performing arts and community events. The engineered, high wind safe canopy and supports will be removable during winter and inclement seasons to ensure longer lifespan of equipment. An area behind the sloped seating will incorporate new tree plantings for shade and shelter.

4.2 Waterfront Plaza (Prop 68 Rural Recreation and Tourism Grant Application) The waterfront plaza is envisioned as a civic scaled plaza along the waterfront with lighting, vendor hook-ups, seating and informational displays situated at a natural convergence of pedestrian, bicycling and automobile traffic connecting Howe Drive, Stamps Way, inter-park pathways and the Californian Coastal Trail at the safest access point to the sandy beach. This feature is also situated between two parking areas in order to support larger public events and/or increased visitor use due to the panoramic views of the mountains, ocean, lighthouse and harbor areas.

4.3 Cultural Interpretive Enhancements (Coastal Stories Grant Application) The City also has an application pending for the Coastal Conservancy Coastal Stories Grant Program to fund the expansion of the area in which the Tolowa stories are told and to use a more elaborate and engaging storytelling format by commemorating the tribe’s oral tradition with audio/video. The Tolowa Coastal Stories project would tell ten unique Tolowa stories along the Coastal Trail with 5-7 minute video clips linked to a scannable QR code or a hand-cranked ADA accessible outdoor audio platform with optional scavenger hunt questions built into the website hosting the videos. The questions would require participants to be in the space to get the answers. The Front Street Project will provide essential parking for this family friendly adventure which would start at the Visitor’s Center and end at Brother Jonathan Park 9 5. Scope of Professional Services

5.1 Scope of Services
The objective of this Scope of Services is to outline the general requirements and professional expertise necessary to successfully develop the Project. The Scope of Services is to be used as a general guide and is not intended to be a complete list of all work or requirements necessary to provide engineering design and other support services for the Project.

This scope includes final planning, design, engineering, construction management and other related professional services necessary to implement the elements of the Master Plan that will be included in the Project, and will specifically include the following services:
(1) Final planning and space design services – complete an evaluation of the concept master plan to ensure continuity between amenities and storyline throughout the park
(2) General engineering design services –perform data collection, mapping and surveying as necessary to design the Project
(3) Environmental review – conduct environmental review, any necessary studies and prepare CEQA documents for Phase 1
(4) Permitting as required – apply for and obtain required permits (Coastal Development Permit, etc.)
(5) Project Management / Coordination – scheduling, corresponding and tracking to insure timely completion and budget adherence (6) Field Investigations – conduct field investigations as necessary (7) Report preparation – prepare various reports for submission to City staff and / or City Council
(8) Minimum of 2 Meetings seeking public input and presentation of reports and draft layouts for the pump track in addition to City Council and Planning Commission
(9) Meetings and presentation of reports and draft layouts for signage to a City established tribal cultural committee and/or tribal councils (120 hours) (10) Minimum of 2 Meetings seeking public input and presentation of reports and draft layouts of kidtown expansion, park entry signage, and trail/exercise loop
(11) Preparation of General Development Plan
(12) Preparation of PS&E for Phase 1
(13) One presentation of the draft design to the Planning Commission (14) One presentation of the draft design to the City Council (15) Bid package preparation and bid review – prepare construction plans, specifications and bidding documents for construction, assist the City in all aspects of the bidding process with construction including respo9nding to 10 requests for information, preparing addendums, attending pre-bid meetings, review bid results and qualify lowest responsible bidder, make recommendations for award
(16) Construction Management – review and approved contractor’s shop drawings, schedules, insurance, submittals and make recommendation for Notice to Proceed; perform contract administration, review contractor’s payment requests and make recommendations for payment, conflict resolution, releases, bonds and final pay requests certificates of completion, negotiate proposed change orders, perform inspection services,
(17) Meeting all requirements of the funding source; see the following guides:

1. Per Capita Grant:
https://www.parks.ca.gov/pages/1008/files/Per_Capita_Progra m_Procedural_Guide_Sept_2020_9.1.20%20_8.4.21.pdf

2. Competitive Grant:
https://www.parks.ca.gov/pages/1008/files/Grant_Administratio n_Guide_Competitive_Grant_Programs_May_2020_Final_3_6
.4.20.pdf

5.2 Key Project Deliverables:
(1) General Development Plan as described in the Scope of work B.1 (2) Preliminary design estimates with contingency to ensure Project elements are scaled appropriately to fit within targeted construction budgets. (3) 30% plans including selection of equipment, signs, etc. selected by design committee.
(4) 60% plans, specifications, and estimate (PS&E) for staff review. Project permit applications submitted.
(5) Final (90%) draft PS&E.
(6) All AutoCAD files submitted to the City shall be 2017 or later DWG file format.
(7) Bid package documents for construction
(8) Bid Review / Award recommendation
(9) Conformed plans and specifications
(10) Complete construction management records
(11) Record drawings and project closeout documentation

5.3 Consultant Responsibilities:
(1) Consultant must maintain a current professional license that is applicable to the type of work being completed. This includes but is not limited to licensure from the California State Board for Professional Engineers, Land Surveyors and Geologists (BPELSG), the California Council of Landscape 11 Architectural Registration Boards (CLARB) as well as any other certifications or licenses as required by federal, state and local laws.. (2) Professional involvement throughout all phases of the project including but not limited to preparation of reports, periodic progress reports/meetings, processing of invoices for service, timely processing of project correspondence, consultants request for payment, and material and equipment submittals.
(3) Other types of professional and non-professional services consistent with the nature of this RFQ, potentially including subconsultants. (4) Consultant is solely responsible for providing adequate staff to perform the services on time and within budget.
(5) Adhere to facility site safety and access rules when performing work onsite including mandatory PPE including hardhats, safety glasses and protective footwear.
(6) Manage the project so that timelines are adhered to, and key deadlines are met.

IV. FUNDING AND PROJECT TIMING:

Funding for the Project is provided by the Parks and Water Bond Act of 2018 (Proposition 68), placed on the ballot via Senate Bill 5 (DeLeon, Chapter 852, statutes of 2017), and approved by voters on June 5, 2018.

The City received a $5,000,000 competitive grant from the Statewide Parks Program (SPP), a Proposition 68 (Prop. 68) funded grant. The funds will be used to design and implement specific features of the Beachfront Park Master Plan.

The selected Consultant will have a maximum budget of $650,000 for all pre-construction activities, such as design, environmental review, permitting, project management and bidding.

The targeted construction budget is $4.35 million to cover all construction and construction management costs. The Project elements are scalable, and the Consultant will be responsible for designing and permitting the Project in a way that includes each of the elements and meets the intent of the conceptual design. The Consultant is also responsible for developing the Project so that it can be constructed within the defined budget.

The City was also granted $177,952 in Per Capita funding, and the Council approved this allocation to fund the Paths of Culture project located on the west side of Beachfront Park adjacent to the pool and the Tolowa Cultural Interpretive Area.

The selected Consultant will have a maximum budget of $30,000 for all pre-construction activities, such as design, environmental review, permitting, project management and bidding.

The targeted construction budget is $147,952 to cover all construction and construction management costs of this element.
12 To meet the timeframe of the grants, the design and construction for Phase 1 will most likely need to be completed in two stages.

Phase 1:
 Stage 1  Per Capita grant funded project (Paths of Culture) and select elements within the Statewide Parks Program
grant
o Design in 2022
o Construction in 2023
o Final closeout June 30, 2024
 Stage 2  Remainder of the Statewide Parks Program grant elements described in the Project
o Design in 2023
o Construction in 2024
o Final closeout June 30, 2025
Phase 2:

The City is currently applying for additional grants and anticipates receiving additional funds that will be used to expand upon the scope of professional services that are requested herein to include the design of additional features within the Beachfront Park Master Plan. One grant is the Prop 68 Rural Recreation and Tourism Grant in which the City applied for $3 million to design and construct an amphitheater and waterfront plaza, and the other is a $200,000 Coastal Voices grant to expand the Tolowa cultural interpretive area experience.

If funded, the City anticipates the construction of the cultural interpretive enhancements will be completed by December 2023 and the design of the Amphitheater and Waterfront Plaza would be inline with the Phase 1, Stage 2 schedule (Design 2023, Construction 2024). Alternate phases or related projects that are funded may be added to the scope of services by contract amendment at a later date.

V. POLICY AND PROCEDURES:
 All Consultants are required to register to submit an SOQ. This will ensure that all Consultants receive addenda and other updates. Consultants may register their intent by emailing their contact information to [email protected] with a copy to [email protected]. The subject line should read: Registration of Intent – Beachfront Park Master Plan Phase 1 Design.
 Site visits are welcome. Upon request, City staff can join you on your site visit (depending on availability of staff at the time requested). Requests for site visits with staff must be submitted before April 29, 2022.
 The City reserves the right to amend this RFQ prior to the deadline for SOQ submission.

All addenda become part of the RFQ.
13  A submittal may be considered non-responsive if conditional, incomplete, or if it contains alterations of form, additions not called for, or other irregularities that may constitute a material change to the RFQ.
 The City also reserves the right to waive any minor irregularities or defects in any SOQ received.
 All submittals become the property of the City of Crescent City.  Consultants are solely responsible for the costs of preparation of an SOQ in response to this solicitation, regardless of the outcome of this RFQ process.  The City of Crescent City reserves the sole right to judge the Consultant's representation, either written or oral.
 The City of Crescent City may at its option, invite one or more of the Consultants to make a presentation to City staff or the City Council before a final selection is made.  This solicitation does not bind the City of Crescent City to award a contract, to pay any cost incurred with the preparation of a Consultant’s SOQ, or to procure or contract for services or supplies.
 The City of Crescent City reserves the right to accept or reject any or all qualifications received in response to this request, to negotiate with any qualified Consultant, or cancel in whole or in part this RFQ process if it is in the best interest of the City of Crescent City to do so.
 Consultants must furnish any documentation requested by the City within seven (7) business days from the date of request or they may be considered unresponsive.  The City reserves the right to reject any SOQ if the documentation submitted by the proposer fails to satisfy City and or the Consultant is unable to supply the documentation within the time period requested. Also, the City reserves the right to terminate the contract for cause after the award if any of the documentation is found later to be misleading or if the Consultant has misrepresented its qualifications and experience.  The City reserves the right to modify the form of professional services agreement in the interest of the City, in whole or in part, at any time up to the negotiation of the agreement with the selected Consultant.
 All submitted statements of qualifications will remain confidential until after a recommendation for award has been made. If Consultant claims that any information submitted as part of the SOQ is confidential / proprietary, then such documents must be marked “CONFIDENTIAL”. Following the award recommendation, all SOQ will be subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act (Gov. Code § 6250 et seq.) public records, except for those confidential / proprietary documents exempt from disclosure.

VI. DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION
Statements of qualifications must be received by the City on or before the due date and time.

Postmarks will not be considered in judging the timeliness of submissions. Statements of qualifications may be delivered in person or mailed to:

Location: City of Crescent City
14 Public Works Department
377 J Street
Crescent City, CA 95531
Attn: Jon Olson
Consultants interested in responding must submit 5 hard copies, and 1 electronic copy of their statement of qualifications. Label the outside of the package “Beachfront Park Master Plan Phase 1 Design SOQ, Attention: Jon Olson.” Statements of qualifications received after the Proposal Deadline will not be accepted by the City. Each SOQ received will be screened to ensure that the information required in this RFQ is included. Partial or incomplete submissions may disqualify a statement of qualifications from further consideration.

To ensure fair and equal access to information about this RFQ, all questions or requests for clarification must be submitted in writing via email to Jon Olson at: [email protected] with a copy to [email protected]. Questions and answers/clarifications will be distributed to each firm that registered its intent to submit a Statement of Qualifications.

RFQ SCHEDULE
Please be aware that each date contained in this RFQ is subject to change.

The tentative schedule and sequence of this RFQ is as follows:
 Issue Request for Qualifications 4/15/22
 Registration Deadline 4/28/22
 Last day for site visits 4/29/22
 Deadline for submitting questions 4/29/22
 Response to questions 5/5/22
 Proposals Deadline No later than 4:00 p.m. 5/16/22
 Selected Top Consultant Interviews 5/25/22
 Begin Contract Negotiations with selected firm(s) 5/31/22  Obtain City Council Approval of Contract 6/20/22
VII. CONTENTS OF SUBMISSIONS
Consideration of statements of qualifications by the City is contingent upon the submission of the mandatory information identified in this section. Failure to include any information item or to complete any form listed or referenced in this RFQ could result in the rejection of the SOQ without further consideration by the City. Any exceptions to the requirements of this RFQ or the form professional services agreement need to be noted. Additional and supplemental information may be submitted in so far as it pertains and clarifies the data sought by this RFQ. All information required by the RFQ must be completely and fully provided. If the City determines that any information submitted by a Consultant is false or misleading, the City will reject the SOQ. 15 For ease of review and to facilitate evaluation, the SOQ submitted for this Project must be organized in order as follows:

A. COVER PAGE
Indicate the name of the Consultant’s firm or association and the Project name as listed above.

B. COVER LETTER
This letter shall provide a brief introduction and executive summary including the name and address of the proposing Consultant and the name, title, address, telephone number and fax number of the person(s) authorized to represent the Consultant. The California license number (if applicable) and the name of the person who will serve as the Consultant’s contact must be included. The letter must be signed by a person authorized by to obligate the Consultant to perform the commitments contained in the SOQ.

Submission of the signed letter of introduction will constitute a representation by Consultant that the Consultant is willing and able to perform the commitments contained in the RFQ/SOQ. The cover letter must acknowledge all addenda received.

Limit of two (2) pages.

C. KEY PERSONNEL & QUALIFICATIONS
Provide a one-page resume for the Consultant’s lead in each of the following key areas:

Phase 1:

1. Overall Project Lead

2. General Masterplan Conflict Resolution

3. Survey work

4. Park Entry at Stamps Way

5. Bike Park - Pump Track

6. Tolowa Cultural Interpretive Area with Indigenous Plantings

7. One Mile Class 1 Trail/Exercise Loop

8. New ADA Playground Kidtown expansion

9. Paths of Culture
Phase 2:

10. Amphitheater

11. Waterfront Plaza

12. Tolowa Cultural Enhancement
Additionally, each resume may contain up to three (3) additional pages demonstrating the individual’s capability in the key area that they will be leading. The 16 additional pages should contain images, figures, explanatory text, etc. showing expertise in the selected field.

D. ORGANIZATION OF CONSULTANT FIRM

1. Information pertaining to the structure and organization of the Consultant’s firm, including the name of the sole proprietor, or if a corporation, partnership, or joint venture, the names of all individuals and firms which constitute the corporation, partnership, or joint venture.

2. Provide specific information concerning your Consultant in this section. Include the firm size, number and type of professional staff, number of years in the business and the location where the work will be performed.

3. If two or more firms are involved in an association or a joint venture for this Project, provide information concerning past associations and outline the working relationship for this Project between the firms, e.g., indicate where management responsibility resides and where quality control, design, and production coordination will be performed.

Limit of one (1) page per firm.

E. RELATED WORK EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS

1. For evaluation purposes, provide a statement of qualifications and illustrations of Consultant’s major projects associated with park projects with similarities to the Project.

2. Provide specific information concerning Consultant’s experience, and that of any sub-consultants, with engineering support services.

3. Consultant must be able to demonstrate to the City’s satisfaction its capabilities including evidence that they possess adequate facilities to fully comply with the requirements of the contract prior to award and at any time during the contract term or extension thereof. Also, Consultant’s experience record regarding past performance and the ability to perform on schedule may be requested.

4. Provide valuation of similar projects.

Limit of one (1) page per Consultant firm.

F. STAFFING AND SCHEDULE
17 1. Identify resources available within Consultant’s organization available to perform Scope of Work set forth in this RFQ.

Limit of one (1) page per Consultant firm.

2. Provide a schedule showing detailed steps and key milestones that align with the Project schedule outlined above.

Limit of one (1) page.

G. SCOPE OF WORK

1. Include a detailed Scope of Work Statement describing all services to be provided.

2. Describe project deliverables for the various services to be provided.

3. Describe Consultant’s cost control and budget methodology for this project.

Limit of five (5) pages total.

H. REFERENCES
Provide a minimum of three (3) references for the Consultant firm and each of the key personnel identified in the SOQ. For each reference, include a telephone number and the name of a key contact person.

Limit of one (1) page.

I. HOURLY RATES AND FEES
Each Consultant must submit a schedule of proposed hourly rates and fees for each staff member to be assigned to the Project. The schedule must also include a basic Project budget showing the level of effort (hours) for each element allocated among Consultant’s staff, subconsultant’s, etc. The rate sheet and budget must be submitted in a separate sealed envelope and marked “Rate Schedule”.

VIII. EVALUATION PROCEDURES AND CRITERIA
All submittals meeting the minimum threshold requirements set forth in Section VII - CONTENTS OF SUBMISSION, will be evaluated by a selection committee. Each SOQ will be scored on a scale of 100 points. The selection committee will be comprised of staff from the City and other persons selected for their expertise or involvement in the Project.

Any false, incomplete or otherwise unresponsive submission provided in connection with a SOQ or any documentation or other information supplied to the City by the Consultant may be 18 cause for rejection of the SOQ or disqualification of the Consultant at the City’s sole discretion.

Any judgment as to the significance of any falsity, incompleteness or unresponsiveness will be the prerogative of the City and its judgment is final.

The selection committee will evaluate the SOQs in accordance with the criteria below. The evaluation of the SOQs will be within the sole judgment and discretion of the selection committee.

The City reserves the right to request additional information which, in the City’s opinion, is necessary to evaluate whether a Consultant’s qualifications, experience, number of qualified employees, business organization, and financial resources are adequate to perform the services required for the Project.

Evaluation Criteria:

Metric Max Points
Understanding of project and completeness of SOQ. See areas VII-A, B, D & I. 5 Key personnel, specific experience, qualifications, and demonstrated level of proficiency in each of the areas listed in area VII-C.
35 Specific ability to bring the required level of staffing and support to complete the Project. See areas VII-E.
15 Project plan, scope of work, project deliverables, and methodology. See areas VII-F, G.
35 References providing feedback on individual’s/consultant’s/firm’s specific skill and ability to complete projects meeting the client’s desires and needs on time and within budget. Se area VII-H.
10 After evaluating the SOQs in accordance with the above criteria, the City will interview the top Consultant(s) to reach a final decision on the most qualified Consultant to perform the services required for the Project.

IX. SELECTION, NEGOTIATION OF FEE, AND ENGAGEMENT PROCESS The City will review all proposals to verify that the proposing firms and proposals meet the mandatory requirements set forth in this RFP and that the proposals are responsive to the RFP.

After determining that a proposing firm meets the mandatory requirements and that its proposal is responsive, the firm will receive a preliminary score/ranking. Based on the initial ranking, the City may select and conduct interviews with one or more qualified firms. The interview rankings, if conducted, will contribute to the selection of the most qualified firm(s).

The City will engage the most qualified Consultant in negotiations to reach a mutually agreeable professional services agreement. Fee and hourly rate information will not be disclosed except as contained in the final negotiated contract.
19 Should the City be unable to negotiate a satisfactory contract with the top qualified Consultant, then the City may choose to enter negotiations with the second highest qualified Consultant and so on until an agreement is reached. Upon reaching a satisfactory agreement, City staff will recommend award of the contract to the City Council.

Upon approval by the City Council, the City will tender the Professional Services Agreement to the Consultant who will have 14 days to return the signed contract and all required insurance certificates. The City will then officially authorize the commencement of work.

X. TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR SUBMISSIONS OF SOQs
A. Errors and Omissions in RFQ
Consultants are responsible for reviewing all portions of this RFQ and to promptly notify the City, in writing, if the Consultant discovers any ambiguity, discrepancy, omission, or other error in the RFQ. Any such notification should be directed to the City promptly after discovery, but in no event later than five (5) working days prior to the date for receipt of SOQs.

Modifications and clarifications will be made by addenda as provided below.

B. Inquiries Regarding RFQ
Inquiries regarding the RFQ and all oral notifications of intent to request written modification or clarification of the RFQ must be directed in writing via email to:

Jon Olson: [email protected]
With a copy to: [email protected]
Reference: RFQ, Beachfront Park MP Design Phase 1
C. Objections to RFQ Terms
Should a Consultant object on any ground to any provision or legal requirement set forth in this RFQ, the Consultant must, not more than ten (10) calendar days after the RFQ is issued, provide written notice to the City setting forth with specificity the grounds for the objection. The failure of a Consultant to object in the manner set forth in this paragraph will constitute a complete and irrevocable waiver of any such objection.

Any objections to RFQ Terms must be directed in writing via email to:

Jon Olson: [email protected]
With a copy to [email protected]
Reference: RFQ, Beachfront Park MP Design Phase 1
D. Addenda to RFQ
Any modifications, clarifications, or amendments to this RFQ will be done by issuing 20 Addenda. The Consultant is responsible for ensuring that its submission reflects any and all Addenda issued by the City prior to the due date regardless of when the SOQ is submitted.

E. Term of Proposal
Submission of a SOQ signifies that the proposed services and rates are valid for 180 calendar days from the SOQ due date and that the rates are genuine and not the result of collusion or any other anti-competitive activity.

F. Revision of Proposal
A Consultant may revise a SOQ on the Consultant’s own initiative at any time before the deadline for submission of SOQs. The Consultant must submit the revised SOQ in the same manner as the original. A revised SOQ must be received on or before the SOQ due date and time.

In no case will a statement of intent to submit a revised SOQ, or commencement of a revision process, extend the due date for any Consultant.

G. Errors and Omissions in Proposal
Failure by the City to object to an error, omission, or deviation in a SOQ will in no way modify the RFQ or excuse the Consultant from full compliance with the specifications of the RFQ or any contract awarded pursuant to the RFQ.

H. Protests of Consultant Selection Process

1. Eligibility. Only a Consultant who has submitted a SOQ in response to the RFQ may submit a protest.

2. Protest Deadline. Protest must be submitted before 5:00 pm. no later than two business following notice of the recommendation of award (“protest deadline”). The protest may be submitted by personal delivery, courier, or facsimile transmission to City Hall.

3. Protest Contents & Procedure. The protest must contain a complete statement of the basis for the protest and all supporting documentation. Material submitted after the bid protest deadline will not be considered. The protest must include the name, address, email address and telephone number of the person representing the protesting party.

A copy of the protest and any supporting documentation must be concurrently transmitted by facsimile transmission or electronic mail (email), before the protest deadline, to the Consultant recommended for award of the contract (“selected Consultant”).

4. Response to Protests. The selected Consultant may submit a written response to the protest, provided the response is received by the City before 5:00 p.m. within two business days after the bid protest deadline or after actual receipt of the bide protest, 21 whichever is sooner (the “response” deadline). The selected Consultant may submit the response to the protest by personal delivery, courier, or facsimile transmission.

The response must include all supporting documentation. Material submitted after the response deadline will not be considered. The response must include the name, address, email address, and telephone number of the person representing the selected Consultant. A copy of the response and all supporting documents must be concurrently transmitted by facsimile transmission or electronic mail (email), before the response deadline, to the protesting party.

5. Decision. Within five business days of the response deadline, the city manager will issue a decision on the protest. The decision of the city manager is final.

6. Exclusive Remedy. This protest procedure and the time limits set forth herein are mandatory and are the sole and exclusive remedy for Consultants who have submitted an SOQ in response to this RFQ to protest the selection process. A party’s failure to comply with these procedures will constitute a waiver of any right to further pursue a protest, including filing a Government Code claim or initiation of legal proceedings.

Attachments:

1. Form Professional Services Agreement

2. Beachfront Park Master Plan (Updated 2021)

3. Front Street Secondary Outfall Plan

4. Front Street Master Plan

5. Marine Mammal Center CDP

6. Proposition 68 Per Capita Application

7. Proposition 68 SPP Application

8. Proposition 68 RRT Application

9. Coastal Stories Application

CITY OF CRESCENT CITY
RFP No. 2022-02

BEACHFRONT PARK MASTER PLAN
May 16, 2022
110 SE MAIN ST. SUITE 100, PORTLAND, OR 97214 | 503.222.5612

Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City i
THIS PROPOSAL IS PRINTED ON 100% POST-CONSUMER CONTENT RECYCLED PAPER, MANUFACTURED IN THE U.S.A. USING WIND POWER. PLEASE RECYCLE.

Proposal
B. Cover Letter ii
C. Key Personnel & Qualifications 1
D. Organization of Consultant Firm 55
E. Related Work Experience & Qualifications 57
F. Staffing & Schedule 59
G. Scope of Work 61
H. References 65
TA
B
L
E
O
F
C
O
N
T
E
N
T
S
ii Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City
May 16, 2022
Jon Olson and Drew Leighton
City of Crescent City
Public Works Department
377 J Street
Crescent City, CA 95531
Re: Beachfront Park Master Plan Phase 1 Design SOQ
Dear Mr. Olson and Mr. Leighton -
“Comeback Town USA”, indeed!
Bill Stamps may have coined this description of his beloved Crescent City after the tsunami of 1964, but it is still valid today. We recognize that Beachfront Park can play a huge role in this generation’s contribution to the comeback of Crescent City. It is the place where the stories of the Tolowa and other tribes will merge with the spectacular natural setting of the park to create a public gathering and recreational space that is treasured by all.

This Beachfront Park Phase 1 project is complex, due to the physical and social histories of this site. The complexity of the project also creates opportunities we now understand, having traveled to the site. While there, we discussed the importance of the park with the Chamber of Commerce, Historical Society, and City staff. We came away from our visit highly enthusiastic about this project, and excited about how it could be transformative for Crescent City and Del Norte County.

We understand that the scope of work outlined in the RFQ is only the beginning of the metamorphosis of Beachfront Park. However, by engaging in this early work, we want to join you on this journey to realize the full transformation that will make the park a source of great pride for locals, and a must-see destination for travelers.

Mike Abbaté will be the Project Manager and Overall Project Lead as well as your primary contact for this contract, and Paul Agrimis will be the Principal-in-Charge for GreenWorks PC as the Prime Consultant.

Mike is one of two co-founders of the firm, and though no longer an employee of GreenWorks, we commonly collaborate to best align our skills with the needs of our clients. We currently have two other projects where we are teamed this way. Our familiarity with each other guarantees a seamless design process for you. Paul Agrimis is authorized to represent GreenWorks, Abbaté Designs and the entire Consultant Team for this contract. We have received all addenda.

Mike Abbaté’s career has been focused on the planning, design, construction, maintenance, and administration of parks. As a long-time Parks Director, he knows some of the issues that face municipal staff as they strive to meet the community’s expectations for parks, recreation, and special events. It is not possible to go to the grocery store without hearing some suggestions on how to improve things! We are also familiar with the disconnect between funding the implementation of beautiful, rendered plans and the ongoing maintenance that they require. Both sides of the question must be solved. We can help.

GREENWORKS, PC • LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE • ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN | 110 MAIN STREET, SUITE 100 PORTLAND, OREGON 97214 • P. 503.222.5612 • F. 503.222.2283 • GREENWORKSPC.COM B. Cover Letter
Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City iii We have assembled an incredible team of talented people and firms to provide the design, estimating, permitting, and documentation services you have requested for the implementation of the Beachfront Park Master Plan Preset. We have deep on-going relationships with most of the team members, and some like Stover Engineering, give us unique access to the history and on-going progress of Crescent City. Our team of landscape architects, interpretive designers, engineers, and permitting specialists are:

ACCOMPLISHED We are experts in helping small communities realize big dreams through excellence in park design and interpretive storytelling.

RESOURCEFUL We bring a creative process that finds surprising ways to maximize every dollar; accomplishing multiple objectives while inspiring communities.

COLLABORATIVE We are good listeners, ensuring that the process is as clear, thorough, and satisfying as our end products.

Though we have extensive experience in the planning, design, and construction of waterfront parks, what we really are is a team of creative problem solvers, especially accomplished in choreographing multidisciplinary teams in complex projects.

Ben Johnson of GreenWorks is our team’s Supervising Landscape Architect, and his California Landscape Architecture License number is 6182.

We look forward to discussing this further with you.

Mike Abbaté, Abbaté Designs Paul Agrimis, GreenWorks
Project Lead Principal in Charge
GREENWORKS, PC • LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE • ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN | 110 MAIN STREET, SUITE 100 PORTLAND, OREGON 97214 • P. 503.222.5612 • F. 503.222.2283 • GREENWORKSPC.COM B. Cover Letter
iv Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City
Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City v
Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City 1
BEACHFRONT PARK MASTER PLAN PHASE 1

7. One Mile Class 1 Trail / Exercise Loop: GreenWorks

8. New ADA Playground Kidtown Expansion: GreenWorks

9. Paths of Culture: Sea Reach

10. Amphitheater: Abbaté Designs

11. Waterfront Plaza: GreenWorks

12. Tolowa Cultural Enhancement: Sea Reach

13. Structural: KPFF Consulting Engineers

14. Permitting: Camas LLC

15. Electrical: PAE

16. Resilient Design: GreenWorks

17. Quality Control: GreenWorks
C. Key Personnel & Qualifications
Our proposal for Crescent City Beachfront
Master Plan is a joint venture between
Abbaté Designs and GreenWorks.

Together, Abbaté Designs and GreenWorks will manage a
team of eight specialized subconsultants to bring tailored expertise to the design, planning and execution of Beachfront Park. In the following section, we have outlined our key leads in each required area as well as five additional areas that we believe are critical components to a successful approach for Beachfront Park.

1. Overall Project Lead: Abbaté Designs

2. General Masterplan Conflict Resolution: GreenWorks

3. Survey Work: Stover Engineering

4. Park Entry at Stamps Way: Abbaté Designs

5. Bike Park Pump Track: Velosolutions

6. Tolowa Cultural Interpretive Area with Indigenous Plantings: Sea Reach
2 Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City
Mike is a landscape architect, parks leader, planner, and team leader with over 35 years of professional experience, the majority of which has been focused on the design of public spaces. He has led effective teams in both the private and public sectors that planned, designed, and helped build a wide variety of park projects, including National, State, and local parks.

In addition to planning and designing significant parks, Mike has been a public servant and recognized leader in Parks and Recreation administration for many years. First, he was the Urban Design & Planning Director for Gresham, Oregon where he oversaw current and long-range planning, as well as the CDBG program and instituted a new City Design Commission.

Then, he was the Director of Portland Parks and Recreation for 7 years, during which Portland Parks & Recreation received the Gold Medal from the National Recreation & Parks Association (NRPA) as the best-managed municipal park system in the U.S. He currently serves on the National Board of Directors for the National Recreation & Parks Association, and is LEED Accredited Professional, with expertise in sustainable design strategies. He is a Fellow in the American Society of Landscape Architects.

This unique public sector experience has helped him develop effective strategies for working with elected officials, listening to, and presenting to residents, and planning projects that are visionary, yet implementable. His 25 years in the private sector focusing on parks planning and design has demonstrated his ability to bring projects in on time and within budget.

Some of the key parks projects where he has led interdisciplinary teams include:
• Vietnam War Memorial at Oregon State Capitol, Salem,
OR
• Hood River Waterfront Park, OR
• Independence Plaza and Amphitheater, OR
• The Confluence Project at Cape Disappointment
• State Park, WA
These projects are described and illustrated in the following pages.

C. Key Personnel & Qualifications

1. Overall Project Lead: Mike Abbaté, PLA, Abbaté Designs

EDUCATION
Bachelor of Landscape Architecture
Cal Poly University, Pomona
• Magna cum laude
• Howard O. Boltz Medal as Outstanding Landscape
Architecture student
• Certificate of Honor, American Society of Landscape
Architects
• Distinguished Alumnus, 2007
Certificate in Business Administration
Portland State University

ACCREDITATIONS AND MEMBERSHIPS
• Registered Landscape Architect (Oregon, Washington,
Alaska, nationwide through CLARB)
• LEED Accredited Professional
• American Society of Landscape Architects
• Council of Fellows, American Society of Landscape
Architects
• National Recreation and Parks Association
Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City 3
Oregon Capitol Vietnam War Memorial, Salem, OR
This will be the official Vietnam War Memorial on the
State Capitol Grounds in Salem, OR, just south of the
WWII Memorial. The Memorial remembers the war and
those who served our country in a tumultuous time. The
design recognizes the fractured public sentiment about
the war and the way returning Veterans were treated.

Incorporating two dramatic sculptures, the Memorial
captures the fragmented reception returning Vietnam
Veterans faced, while embracing the love of nature of all Oregonians.

Overall Project Lead: Abbaté Designs
Hood River Waterfront Park*
Mike Abbaté served as Principal-In-Charge and team leader for this new waterfront park. This park transformed the public waterfront of Hood River, OR, making the Columbia River visible, accessible and swimmable for residents and visitors alike.

Residents consider this new park the “welcoming Front Door” of the community, built upon the prime location of the park, perched at the river’s edge. Since the completion of the park, economic development on the surrounding properties has been dramatic, creating a new place of vitality and community gatherings.

Restaurants, brewers, manufacturers, and shops have all popped up around the park. This is the kind of economic development potential that a newly invigorated beachfront park could have in Crescent City.
* GreenWorks project
Mike Abbaté was the designer for this new memorial, and is now coordinating the Design, Engineering, Interpretive Design and Construction Team as the Owner’s Representative. This team includes GreenWorks landscape architects as the Landscape Architect of Record. Abbaté and Greenworks have a long history of productive collaboration together as Mike was one of the co-founders of the firm in 1996. That will ensure that the Beachfront Park process in Crescent City will be seamless and well-coordinated.

C. Key Personnel & Qualifications
4 Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City

A NEW GATEWAY PLAZA FOR INDEPENDENCE
Independence Plaza and Amphitheater *
This new gateway plaza for Independence, OR features a major public plaza, a Veteran’s memorial, an iconic fountain, and an amphitheater for upwards of 5000 people. The creation of this new public space has led to a major downtown revitalization of this small town with a population of just over 10,000 people.

Mike Abbaté served as the Principal-in-Charge and lead
designer for this project, coordinating the efforts of
GreenWorks, Civil Engineering, Structural Engineering, and Lighting engineer. Multiple contractors were also involved in the construction, including a special Fountain fabricator and contractor.

This effort took a great deal of community involvement, and Mike Abbaté led the team in this. Of special concern were Veterans who were concerned that their Memorial on the
site woulf be diminished. Instead, Mike led them through a design process where the Veteran’s Memorial was given increased visibility and prestige, by placing it at a corner with flagpoles and lighting. Mike also led coordination with the City manager and Project Manager for Independence,
ensuring that they and the public were kept informed of the progress along the way.

Overall Project Lead: Abbaté Designs
* GreenWorks project
C. Key Personnel & Qualifications
Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City 5

THE FOCUS WAS ON THE EFFECT THAT LEWIS &

CLARK HAD ON INDIGENOUS PEOPLE
The Confluence Project at Cape Disapointment State Park, WA* This groundbreaking project with artist Maya Lin (designer of the Vietnam War Memorial in Washington DC), was timed to commemorate the 200th anniversary of Lewis and Clark’s Corps of Discovery. However, the focus was on the effect that Lewis and Clark had on the indigenous people that were living along their route. The Cape Disappointment site, where the Columbia River meets the Pacific Ocean, is a Cultural Landscape filled with many episodes of historical development since Lewis and Clark, such as two lighthouses, military batteries and fortifications, and a Coast Guard base. These and many other historic elements needed to be recognized and protected.

Mike Abbaté served as Principal-in-Charge of this effort for GreenWorks, helping ensure that Maya’s artistic vision for the various artworks were realized. This included coordination with tribes, Washington State Parks, and federal agencies that provided necessary permits for the project. Mike coordinated in-house staff, as well as consultants for structural engineering, civil engineering, environmental permitting, and artisans and contractors.

Overall Project Lead: Abbaté Designs
* GreenWorks project
C. Key Personnel & Qualifications
6 Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City
Ben is a landscape architect registered in California (#6182) with over 20 years of experience on parks master planning projects with a specialized skill in designing bike parks, community parks, regional trails, and inclusive playgrounds.

His skills weave knowledge of programming and design ranges in scale from small neighborhood sites to large, regional parks that require phasing. Ben has managed many recent, complex parks projects and has extensive experience from conceptual design through construction. Ben will provide solutions that are sensitive to the environment, and responsive to the needs and budget and addresses multi-phased approach for design and implementation. He is also adept at facilitating public meetings and presentations, cost estimating, and producing graphic illustrations to convey design ideas for stakeholder and public engagement.

Ben is known as an effective collaborator with design teams, clients, and public interest groups. His work relies heavily on garnering support for park designs during stakeholder and community engagement process. Building trust comes through listening, understanding perspectives, and building consensus.

Ben often assists clients develop Public Involvement Plans that can be easily implemented wither in-person, virtual, or combination of both. He utilizes value based planning methods, where values are identified early and as designs progress, decisions are made based on those values. Such values could be cost, feasibility, resiliency, accessibility, comfort, safety, place-making.

The overlap of his skills in design of recreational facilities, project management, and community engagement has been
proven on many award-winning projects. These projects are described in detail and are illustrated in the following pages, with additional pertinent professional experience shared as well.
• Geer Community Park Master Plan, Salem, OR
• Battle Creek Park Master Plan, Salem, OR
• Gateway Green, Portland, OR
• Couch Park Plaza and Inclusive Playground, Portland, OR These projects are described and illustrated in the following pages.

EDUCATION
Bachelor of Landscape Architecture, University of Florida

REGISTRATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS
• Professional Landscape Architect in Oregon (LA587),
California (6182)
• CLARB (2016)
AWARDS
Khunamokwst Park, Excellence in Planning, Oregon Parks
and Recreation Association, 2015
Organization Award for Outreach, Oregon Community Trees, 2014
Westmoreland Nature-Based Play Area - Americans for the Arts Public Art Network, Year in Review National Recognition to the Best in Public Art Projects Annually, 2015
Westmoreland Nature-Based Play Area - Honor Award,
Oregon Chapter of American Society of Landscape
Architects, 2014
Cape Horn Overlook* –Honor Award, Oregon Chapter of
American Society of Landscape Architects, 2012

2. General Masterplan Conflict Resolution:

Ben Johnson, PLA, GreenWorks
C. Key Personnel & Qualifications
Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City 7
Geer Community Park Master Plan (Salem, OR)
Ben was the Project Manager and lead designer for master planning this previously undeveloped 22-acre site on the large park property in Salem. This community park includes a man-made riparian slough that treats offsite and on-site stormwater. The Master Plan includes new ball fields, a destination skate park, inclusive playground, splash pad, expanded bike park, picnic shelters, and extensive walking paths, open space, parking and landscape enhancements. The Master Plan was completed in winter of 2022 and underwent a robust virtual community and stakeholder engagement process through COVID-19. The Master Plan addressed phasing, and such GreenWorks is currently designing phase-1 improvements which include a 20,000 square foot skatepark with support facilities that will be constructed in 2024.

This phase of work includes evaluating adjacent uses in order to not conflict with future improvements.

Battle Creek Master Plan (Salem, OR)
Ben led the GreenWorks team’s services to the City of
Salem in developing the Master Plan for Battle Creek
Park, a large, previously undeveloped 56-acre property
in South Salem. The goal for the project was to develop a multi-use park that balanced recreational use with
flood mitigation. Ben led the multidisciplinary team
exploration of ways to integrate flood plain mitigation so that the park would look and feel natural, which
included a robust public outreach program to engage
the community. Tools used to help achieve consensus
for the designs included creating very high quality
graphics that public could understand and get excited
about. The preferred design of blending wildlife habitat and recreation meant there was programming the
community needed while respecting the wishes of
the neighborhood by enhancing and expanding upon
the natural resources of the site. The design took into account the project could easily be built in phases
based on priorities.

General Masterplan Conflict Resolution: GreenWorks
C. Key Personnel & Qualifications
8 Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City
General Masterplan Conflict Resolution: GreenWorks
Gateway Green (Portland, OR)
Ben led the GreenWorks Team with Portland Parks and Recreation, Friends of Gateway Green and stakeholders to transform this 25-acre former brownfield hemmed between I-205 and I-84 in Portland into a destination bike park, open space, and trail sytem. The design incorporates principles of Universal Design.

Concepts were developed with Portland Parks & Recreation’s Project Advisory committee, where disability advocates reviewed design iterations. The design improves environmental conditions, provides habitat restoration, creates open space, and includes Portland’s first flagship bike park. The park opened in 2020.

Gateway Green was awarded the ORPA Design and Construction Award and the APWA Oregon Project of the Year: Structures Award in 2021. GreenWorks supported PP&R with robust community engagement and stakeholder involvement. The park is currently undergoing phase-2 design that includes a pedestrian bridge along a new segment of lightrail that will land on the south part of the site.

C. Key Personnel & Qualifications
Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City 9
3 REPRESENTATIVE EXPERIENCE
Ward is currently a consulting engineer as Principal of Stover Engineering. His focus is on overall management and design for small to large projects. He is personally involved with initial studies, design, and construction management. His diverse background provides a comprehensive approach to his clients’ projects while managing the best resources for a particular task. He is experienced in managing multi-firm and multioffice teams on large complex projects.

He is very familiar with land development and public works projects. Most major public works projects in Del Norte County have been designed or managed by Mr. Stover and his firm for nearly 30 years. Most notable include the Crescent City Wastewater Treatment Facility improvements, Crescent City Harbor District Storm and Tsunami damage projects, Tolowa Dee-ni Nation Dat-naa-svt Village. Major roads include Elk Valley Road, Inyo Street and Washington Boulevard
reconstruction projects.

OTHER STOVER PROJECTS NEAR BEACHFRONT PARK:
• Elk Creek Bridge, Parking & Coastal Trail
• Sunset Circle Coastal Trail
• Crescent City Harbor Coastal Trails
• Front Street Reconstruction Redesign
• City Water Pollution Control Facilities
• Battery Point Lighthouse Repairs

RELAVENT PROJECT DETAILS
City of Crescent City, On-Call Services
Principal-in-Charge for numerous City projects under a
current Master Services Agreement:
• Road Reconstruction projects
• Water System Evaluation
• Survey and Permitting Services
• Climate Change Study
• Water Reuse Study

3. Survey Work: Ward Stover, PE, Stover Engineering

EDUCATION
B.S, Civil Engineering, California State University, Chico (1985)

REGISTRATIONS, CERTIFICATIONS, AND LICENSES
• Civil Engineer, California 44,207 (1989) Civil Engineer, Oregon 14,834 (1990)
• Certified Nuclear Soils Gauge Operator and Radiation
Safety Officer
• California Registered Disaster Service Worker
SAPV10577
•

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
• Stover Engineering; 1992 to Present
• Oscar Larson & Associates; 1985 to 1992
• Caltrans; 1983 and 1984
Mr. Stover has over 35 years of experience in civil
engineering, permitting, design, and construction
management. He has focused on municipal engineering;
structural design and renovation, and drainage, water and wastewater systems. He is an experienced field engineer and supervisor of construction inspectors. He is also
experienced as an expert witness.

C. Key Personnel & Qualifications
10 Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City
California Highway Patrol Replacement Facility, Crescent City, CA The project was delivered to the State of California via a competitive DesignBuild procurement process. Stover Engineering was on two of the three short-listed teams of seven original teams and was ultimately selected as part of the joint venture of Clark/Sullivan and Broward Builders. Arrington Watkins was the Architect of Record. The Project received a LEED Silver rating.

Stover Engineering provided design surveying; site development plans for grading, drainage, stormwater retention, utilities, and parking; and specifications for a new 23,000 SF facility, encompassing an entire 4-acre parcel. The project requirements were very rigorous meeting the State’s standards for a high security essential services facility. The project included 113,000 SF of parking and hardscape area. Actual earthwork quantities balanced under the original design without any significant import or export of material. The project had very constrained site requirements including providing a truck path on-site to accommodate an STAA (Interstate Highway length) tractor/trailer that had to enter and exist on the same street with tight turning movements. Stover Engineering also provided the construction staking.

Client: Clark/Sullivan and Broward Builders Joint Venture Project Owner: State of California
Survey Work: Stover Engineering
Tolowa Dee-Ni Nation – Dat Naa-Svt Village
Site Improvements, Smith River, CA
Currentl y under construction, Stover Engineering
designed and is providing construction
management services for site improvements for
21 single-family residential housing project on
a 10-acre site. Project elements include, roads,
water and sewer utilities, sewer lift station
improvements, site drainage, and sidewalks.

This project was managed and designed under
a very tight timeline to qualify for $10 million
grant funds under a State-sponsored tax
credit program for low income housing. Stover
Engineering is also providing construction
management services for the construction of
the residences and a community center with
a construction cost of $7 million. The Owner,
Tolowa Dee-ni Nation, is a federally recognized
Native American Tribe.

Client: Tolowa Dee-ni Nation
C. Key Personnel & Qualifications
Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City 11
Mike is a landscape architect, parks leader, planner, and team leader with over 35 years of professional experience, the majority of which has been focused on the design of public spaces, including urban design and streetscapes.

As the Urban Design and Planning Director for the City of Gresham, Mike helped the Council and City Manager see
that the built environment in the city was lacking the kind of design excellence that the city aspired to. After engaging with citizens and researching best practices, Mike helped create the Gresham Design Commission, and developed
Design Standards tailored to various unique sections of the city. This effort has resulted in a dramatically improved built environment, including the “public realm”.

In the private sector, Mike has served as the principal urban designer on many projects that create dramatic gateways into cities, parks and neighborhoods. These projects are both visibly dramatic, while also safe for pedestrians, bicyclists, and drivers. For a new park entry like the one proposed at Stamps Way and Front Street, meeting both these functional and aesthetic criteria is critical.

Some of the key parks projects where he has led
interdisciplinary teams include:
• Fairview Gateway Roundabout and Halsey Streetscape,
Fairview, OR
• Gresham Center for the Arts Plaza, Gresham, OR
• Independence Plaza and Amphitheater, OR
• Tanner Springs Park, Portland OR
These projects are described and illustrated in the following three pages.

Park entry at Stamps Way: Mike Abbaté, PLA, Abbaté Designs

EDUCATION
Bachelor of Landscape Architecture
Cal Poly University, Pomona
• Magna cum laude
• Howard O. Boltz Medal as Outstanding Landscape
Architecture student
• Certificate of Honor, American Society of Landscape
Architects
• Distinguished Alumnus, 2007
Certificate in Business Administration
Portland State University

ACCREDITATIONS AND MEMBERSHIPS
• Registered Landscape Architect (Oregon, Washington,
Alaska, nationwide through CLARB)
• LEED Accredited Professional
• American Society of Landscape Architects
• Council of Fellows, American Society of Landscape
Architects
• National Recreation and Parks Association
C. Key Personnel & Qualifications
12 Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City
Fairview Gateway Roundabout and Halsey Streetscape
The City of Fairview’s Urban Renewal Agency asked Abbaté Designs to develop alternatives for streetscape improvements and a new gateway into the city after exiting the adjacent nearby Interstate Highway. The package of improvements presented to and approved by the City Council included a roundabout whose central core reflected the agricultural history, natural resources, and future of the community. A basalt masonry pyramid reflects the looming presence of Mount Hood, bands of ornamental plantings reflect the row crop heritage of this former agrarian area, A bronze Great Blue Heron and wetland planting reflect the many lakes and wetlands of the area, and a cluster of large conifer trees captures the many forested highland areas of the community. The concept illustrated here was further developed in construction documents and awaits construction.

The streetscape section of Halsey also includes new wayfinding monuments, center media plantings, street trees and on-street parking to promote a walkable retail street.

Park Entry at Stamps Way: Abbaté Designs
C. Key Personnel & Qualifications
Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City 13
Fairview Gateway Roundabout and Halsey Streetscape
The City of Fairview’s Urban Renewal Agency asked
Abbaté Designs to develop alternatives for streetscape
improvements and a new gateway into the city after
exiting the adjacent nearby Interstate Highway. The
package of improvements presented to and approved by
the City Council included a roundabout whose central
core reflected the agricultural history, natural resources, and future of the community. A basalt masonry pyramid
reflects the looming presence of Mount Hood, bands of
ornamental plantings reflect the row crop heritage of
this former agrarian area, a bronze Great Blue Heron and wetland planting reflect the many lakes and wetlands
of the area, and a cluster of large conifer trees captures the many forested highland areas of the community.

The concept illustrated here was further developed in
construction documents and awaits construction.

Park Entry at Stamps Way: Abbaté Designs
Independence Plaza and Amphitheater *
This new gateway plaza for Independence, OR features a major public plaza, a Veteran’s memorial, an iconic fountain, and an amphitheater for upwards of 5000 people. The creation of this new public space has led to a major downtown revitalization of this small town with a population of just over 10,000 people. While with GreenWorks, Mike Abbaté served as the design principal in charge and coordinated with the City Manager and City staff to plan, design and construct this new amenity.
* GreenWorks project

THE STREETSCAPE SECTION OF HALSEY ALSO INCLUDES NEW

WAY FINDING MONUMENTS, CENTER MEDIA PLANTINGS,

STREET TREES, AND ON-STREET PARKING TO PROMOTE A
WALKABLE RETAIL STREET.

C. Key Personnel & Qualifications
14 Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City
Tanner Springs Park *
This one-acre oasis in the middle of the bustling
Pearl District joins the site’s history with the future.

Designed in collaboration with Atelier Deiseitl, Tanner Springs Park harkens back to the site’s origins as
Couch Lake, an important wetland along the banks
of the Willamette River. The park is designed as a
plant transect of the Willamette Valley, using only
indigenous native plants from the newly constructed
freshwater pond to the oak woodlands along NW
11th Ave. Merging historic materials such as railroad
rails and basalt ballast cobblestones with a modern
wooden sidewalk and water features creates a unique
public space that celebrates its history while meeting
the needs of today’s inhabitants, both human and
animal. Osprey and herons hare commonly spotted
at the park, looking for fish and amphibians in the
chemical-free freshwater pond.
* GreenWorks project

4. Park Entry at Stamps Way: Abbaté Designs

HIS EXPERTISE IN LANDSCAPE DESIGN HAS MADE HIM A VALUABLE

CONTRIBUTOR TO MANY TRAIL NETWORKS AND COMMUNITY BIKE
PARKS ACROSS THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST.

C. Key Personnel & Qualifications
Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City 15
Our team uses state-of-the-art network infrastructure to operate a variety of design, engineering and management software. In addition, we operate a CNC router to cut with laser precision and ensure that all manufactured materials are perfect every time.

Our creative team is qualified in multiple disciplines to handle action sports projects from promotion to conception to
construction. Velosolutions offers custom design services to municipalities, architects, engineers, landscape architects, contractors, and private interest groups. All our designers are skateboarders or BMXers making them uniquely qualified to understand current action sports’ trends and safety issues.

MEGAN BRADLEY
Megan brings a unique collection of experience and knowledge to our team. She is a National Champion Mountain Biker with a degree in Landscape Architecture and a Lead Bike Park Designer. Megan will be a critical player in the overall layout and integration of any biking component of this project from both a rider perspective but also as a Landscape Professional. Working with both our professional Skate and Bike consultants and the broader project team, Megan will work to maximize the positive impact this facility brings to the community while minimizing the impact to the environment. Megan is also passionate about creating opportunities to bring more people to mountain biking and helping to diversify the sport.
• Champion Mountain Bicyclist since 2014, rider since 2008 • Master of Landscape Architecture, Berkeley
• Action sports park designer since 2018
• Female Athlete of the Year: University of California, Berkeley 2016; Mountain Bike Rider of the Year: Interbike International Bike Expo 2016; National Champion Cat 1 MX Mountain Biking: Mammoth, CA 2016; Omnium Champion:

WCCC Mountain Bike Series 2014, 2105, 2016, 2017.
• Extensive experience in GIS, Rhino, AutoCAD, Photoshop, Illustrator, and InDesign.

5. Bike Park Pump Track: Megan Bradley, Velosolutions
In 2012, Velosolutions built the world’s first asphalt pump track and initiated the growth of the global pump track community.

Today, our tracks are loved by beginners and pro athletes because of their unique design that provides fun, progress, and challenge for everyone.

With our long-lasting expertise in the sports industry, we are recognized as the pump track authority by the UCI and other governing bodies.

EXPERIENCE
350+ projects around the world enabled us to develop the skillset to design the most exciting, challenging yet safe tracks for all riders.

INNOVATION
The desire to make our sport accessible to everyone around the world pushes us to further improve the design and construction methods on every project

SUSTAINABILITY
We believe in green technologies and live by sustainable practices, implanting nature in the core of our value proposition

PASSION
Our experienced team of sports enthusiasts knows exactly how to combine the needs of our clients with the sophisticated expectations of the riders
C. Key Personnel & Qualifications
16 Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City
Bike Park Pump Track: Velosolutions
Pump Track; Columbia, South Carolina
Gateway Green Pump Track, Portland, Oregon
The design team curated a pump track suitable for beginner to advanced cyclists. Highly visible track features allow riders to intuit features they will feel comfortable on while allowing one to test more advanced features as their skills develop. Attention paid to sub-base construction ensures wearing surface durability and the track was coordinated with site drainage in to ensure fun can be had in dry and wet conditions.

Pump Track at Gateway Green; Portland, Oregon
C. Key Personnel & Qualifications
Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City 17

EMPLOYMENT
1985-91 - Sea Search, Instructor
Annual one month field program offered by Sea Search for teachers and students at high school and university levels focusing on field techniques and natural history of Southeast Alaska and surrounding Canadian territory.
1980-85 Scheduling and coordinating of Sea Search Ltd’s various research activities both under contract, and as independent research. Preparation of draft scientific journal articles, and inhouse educational essays, reports and documents. 1975-80 Field data collection and preliminary data analysis for Sea Search Ltd. Studies include oceanography, meteorology, ornithology, marine biology and cetacean behavior.

SUMMARY
Susan Jurasz’s life has involved planning and designing unique visitor experiences via interpretation and art for several decades. Passionate about engaging peoples minds and hearts (of all ages and abilities), Susan is a rare interpretive specialist.

She began Sea Reach Ltd, a design/build interpretive firm in 1985 and has completed literally thousands of projects ranging from $2500 to $1,000,000. Clients include federal, state, and local organizations (both public and private) all over the United States. Projects also include international work in Canada, Jordan, China, and Brazil. Susan’s work is defining interpretation.

Working with the tribes is a big part of the interpretive work at Sea Reach. Susan has worked directly with tribes and with tribal content for more than 30 years.

Though Susan did not work directly with the Tolowa Tribe, her company, Sea Reach was responsible for fabricating and installing the two large entry monuments at Smith River - the salmon and the fisherman.
• Spring Mountains National Recreation Area (SMNRA), Las Vegas, Nevada
• Powell Butte Nature Park, Portland, OR
• Wallowa Hydro Electric Project

6. Tolowa Cultural Interpretive Area: Susan Jurasz, Sea Reach Ltd.

EDUCATION
1988 Richard Rush Studio, Chicago, Illinois: Internship. 1986 University of Alaska, Juneau Alaska: Graduate Courses. 1985 Lewis and Clark College, Portland, OR: B.A. Fine Arts, B.S. Natural Sciences.
1984 American Museum of Natural History, New York, New
York: Internship
1978 University of Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California:

Undergraduate study.
1977 University of Alaska, Fairbanks, Alaska: Undergraduate study.

AWARDS
ASLA Merit Award (Gresham Signage Masterplan, Oregon);
Byway Best Practices Award (Historic
Columbia River Highway, Oregon); USDA Certificate of
Appreciation (National Recreation Strategy
Partner, National); Advocacy Planning Award (The Design Guide, National), Byways Best Practices Award
(Sheyenne River Valley National Scenic Byway, North
Dakota), SEGD Award for excellence in design and
fabrication (Great Salt Lake Shorelands Preserve, Utah).

Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Award
for excellence (Lowell Covered Bridge, Oregon).

EMPLOYMENT
1985- Present - Sea Reach Ltd., president
Business management, project management, exhibit design, site/access planning, interpretive writing, marketing.

C. Key Personnel & Qualifications
18 Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City
Spring Mountain National Recreation Area (SMNRA), Las Vegas, NV The Spring Mountains National Recreation Area (SMNRA) is part of the Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest. Better known to locals as Mount Charleston, it is located just 30 minutes from downtown Las Vegas and encompasses more than 316,000 acres of remarkable beauty and surprising diversity.

The Spring Mountains are approximately 78 miles in length and span from 5,000 feet to 11,918 at the top of Mt. Charleston. As one of southern Nevada’s main Sky Islands, visitors can experience many different environments in a day, traveling from the Mojave Desert to past the treeline on top of Mt. Charleston.

After developing an interpretive plan in 2010, Sea Reach produced all the interpretive elements for the project. Broken up into seven distinct areas that reflect many different ecosystems and human histories.

The Sea Reach team worked with the Southern Paiute to name a series of picnic structures in a newly constructed day use area. An interpretive display, constructed of weathering steel featuring a high pressure laminate graphic panel, was mounted at the entry of each of the seven shelters.

Susan lead this project from inception to completion. Oversaw all of the planning, interpretive workshops with the client, content development, design, fabrication and installation. She was an integral part of every aspect of this project.

Tolowa Cultural Interpretive Area: Sea Reach Ltd.

C. Key Personnel & Qualifications
Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City 19
Tolowa Cultural Interpretive Area: Sea Reach Ltd.

Powell Butte Nature Park, Portland, OR
To the general public, Powell Butte is a large park with acres of forests and grassy meadow…but hidden underneath the ground are two gigantic water reservoirs that are central to Portland’s water supply:
every drop from Portland taps passes through these tanks first. The first 50-million gallon tank was installed in 1979; the second one was installed in 2012. Long-range plans include two more.

Susan Jurasz and Peter Reedijk lead the Sea Reach team in the planning, design, fabrication and installation of interpretive exhibits for the visitor center and adjoining trails. Sea Reach Ltd worked as subconsultant to Nevue Ngan Associates (landscape architects) in the first phase of planning and design and ch2mHill (architecture and engineering) in the second phase of final design and fabrication
Susan was the project lead on the Powell Butte Nature Park interpretive project. Her company, Sea Reach, is responsible for all the interpretive exhibits for the entire park - inside and outside the Visitor Center. Sea Reach also designed, fabricated, and installed a wayfinding system for over 12 miles of trails that surround the VC.

C. Key Personnel & Qualifications
20 Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City
Paul is an award-winning landscape architect, professional engineer, and Professional Wetland Scientist Emeritus bringing over 25 years of leadership in parks master planning and design, in natural resources restoration and public infrastructure, and projects with extensive public involvement and stakeholder engagement skills. He has led numerous parks, open space, floodplain, and marshplain projects with challenging site conditions, sensitive natural and cultural resources, diverse stakeholder interests, and operational considerations. He is well-versed in environmental permitting processes and agency requirements including: Clean Water Act, National Environmental Policy Act, and Endangered Species Act.

Paul is an accomplished project manager who has led dozens of complex projects. He has contributed his leadership skills to many organizations as well. He is a Principal at GreenWorks. He co-founded Vigil-Agrimis, Inc. with Ken Vigil and operated the civil engineering/landscape architecture/natural resources firm for 14 years before merging with Environmental Science Associates. He has served in other leadership capacities as well. First, he was Vice President of The Wetlands Conservancy, an Oregon wetland conservation non-profit. Next, he was Secretary of River Restoration Northwest, the leader in advancing the science and art of stream restoration in the United States. Most recently, he served as Chair of the Portland Parks & Recreation Board and he currently continues to serve on the Board and as the Board representative on the Parks Levy Oversight Committee.

Paul brings multiple perspectives to trail design as an active trail user (running, cycling, hiking, walking), as a parent and former youth sports coach, and as a designer. He approaches trail and exercise loop design starting with functionality, promoting safety, resilience, and then layering in experiential opportunities to enjoy views, unique features such as
vegetation, geologic features, sounds, and other considerations that he might observe through site analysis or learn about by engaging with stakeholders.

Some of the key projects that he has led trail design for include:
• Birch Bay Drive & Pedestrian Facilities, Whatcom County, WA
• Cully Park Master Plan and Phase 1 Design, Portland, OR • Riley Ranch Nature Reserve, Bend, OR
• Cooper Mountain Nature Park, Washington County, OR
These projects are described in detail and illustrated in the following pages, with additional pertinent professional experience shared as well.

7. One Mile Class 1 Trail / Exercise Loop:

Paul Agrimis, ASLA, GreenWorks

EDUCATION
MLA, Landscape Architecture, University of Washington
BSE, Civil Engineering, University of Connecticut

REGISTRATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS
• Professional Landscape Architect, Washington (640)
• Registered Landscape Architect: Oregon (319), Alaska (13, 234)
• Professional Engineer: Washington (33054), Oregon
(14,851), Alaska (7,093)
• Professional Wetland Scientist Emeritus

PROFESSIONAL RECOGNITION (SELECTED)
American Society of Landscape Architects Awards - Oregon Chapter
• People’s Choice Award (2019) for 185-acre Riley Ranch Nature Reserve Management Plan, Bend Park &
Recreation District
• Merit Award and Peoples’ Choice Award (2018) for 25-Acre Cully Community Park, Portland Parks & Recreation
• Distinguished Practitioner (2016) inaugural award given to practitioners who have shaped landscape architecture in Oregon
• Merit Award (2013) for 165-acre Minto-Island Park
Floodplain Restoration, Salem Parks & Recreation
C. Key Personnel & Qualifications
Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City 21
Birch Bay Drive and Pedestrian Facilities, Whatcom County, WA* Birch Bay Drive and Pedestrian Facilities, Whatcom County Public Works, (Whatcom County, WA 2013-2018) Paul was Project Manager for this complex two-mile beach nourishment, natural resources management, and pedestrian trail project. The project team prepared a beach nourishment berm design using 110,000 cubic yards of native gravels and sand that dramatically reduced King Tide flooding while also improving forage fish and nearshore habitat while providing a hard/ soft surface trail along a busy road where pedestrians previously used the road shoulder.

Paul led the public involvement with multiple stakeholders; he conducted key stakeholder interviews to inform project planning; he led all three community open-house events. This project included extensive natural resources analysis for an Environmental Assessment (Washington State Environmental Policy Act); coordination with Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW), Corps of Engineers, and NOAA Fisheries.

Construction was $1.1M and was completed over two seasons in 2020.

One Mile Class 1 Trail / Exercise Loop: GreenWorks
Cully Park Master Plan and Phase 1 Design, Portland, OR* Paul was the Principal-in-Charge and Project
Manager for the master plan of this 25-acre
community park in the Cully neighborhood of NE
Portland that set the vision for transforming an
active landfill into a community park in 2008-
2009. There were numerous environmental and
geotechnical issues (management of methane
gas and landfill leachate, differential settlement,
wetlands, etc.) that needed to be skillfully addressed
to accommodate a Phase 1 program that includes
several athletic fields, facilities, and trails 2013/2018.

He led the team as Principal-in-Charge that created
designs that provide a safe and engaging park amidst
a mixture of industrial, commercial, and residential
land uses surrounding the site with very limited
existing pedestrian access. Paul worked closely with
PP&R and partner Verde to create a Native Gathering
Garden, youth soccer field, trails, restrooms, picnic
facilities, community garden expansion, off-leash
dog area, and a 900-foot green street reconstruction
of NE 72nd Avenue as the entry to the park.

This was a $13M construction effort completed
in 2018. This project won the Merit Award and
People’s Choice Award, Oregon ASLA, 2018.

C. Key Personnel & Qualifications
* Project completed at another firm
22 Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City
Riley Ranch Nature Reserve, Bend, OR
Riley Ranch Nature Reserve Master Plan and Phase 1 Design*, Bend Park & Recreation District, Bend (BPRD), OR. (People’s Choice Award, Oregon ASLA 2019). Paul was the Principal in Charge who guided the team’s services to BPRD in developing a master plan, resource management plan, and Phase 1 design for the 190-acre Riley Ranch along two miles of the Deschutes River. The plans provide BPRD with guidance in the management of the site for its existing and proposed facilities and the initial access and pedestrian trails. Trail design was modified to eliminate potential impacts to cultural resources. The team assessed the existing conditions, developed a resource management plan, engaged the local community, produced a final master plan, and prepared a 100-sheet construction document package for the Phase 1 development. Paul provided quality control oversight of all project documents and provided facilitation for stakeholder and public meetings.

One Mile Class 1 Trail / Exercise Loop: GreenWorks
Cooper Mountain Nature Park, Washington County, OR
Cooper Mountain Nature Park, Metro, Washington
County, OR. (Merit Award, Oregon ASLA 2010) Paul
was the Principal in Charge that led the consultant
team designing visitor facilities and trail access
throughout Cooper Mountain Nature Park. Design
services included a trailhead with educational
facilities, sustainable stormwater management,
and other site facilities on this 231-acre site. Paul
oversaw all design efforts and oversaw wetland
delineations and natural resource assessments,
wetland permitting, environmental, land use and
building permitting efforts for the project. The trails design for the 3.5-mile system avoided or minimized
impacts to habitat. The stormwater design features
treatment wetlands for the 40-car parking lot, and a
rain garden for the Nature House and adjacent plaza.

A disturbed wet meadow was enhanced by terracing
and native plantings as mitigation for unavoidable
wetland impacts.

C. Key Personnel & Qualifications
Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City 23
Ben is a landscape architect registered in California (#6182) with over 20 years of experience on parks master planning projects with a specialized skill in designing inclusive playgrounds. Ben believes an inclusive playground should strive to be above and beyond ADA compliance. Inclusive playgrounds should have a rich variety of play experiences for children of all ages and abilities and be well rounded to offer elements that encourage physical, social, emotional, and cognitive play. Ben is well versed in all aspects of ADA requirements for playground and keys to make a playground inclusive. Below is a list of principals Ben uses in designing inclusive playground:

1. Include Sensory, Physical & Social Activities on the playground to create a rich environment for everyone.

2. Ensure multiple levels of challenges are included. Each and every child coming to play must be challenged, provide will equipment and play features that are easy, medium, and hard.

We want there to be a range of challenge for each type of play in the playground.

3. Ensure that the “Coolest Thing” is accessible to all. Nothing excludes, separates, and creates differences between children more than having the special piece of equipment or feature that everyone wants to play on be inaccessible to some of them. It is important to include these “Cool Things” and ensure that they are accessible to children of all abilities.

4. Create a Layout that supports everyone. We will evaluate how the equipment and play features are placed, where the accessible routes are, places where a child with autism can get oriented and cozy places for reprieve, perimeter fencing to safely contain children that may be potential runners, and places that support caregivers, are all essential components to a successful inclusive playground.

Ben has become knows regionally in the Pacific Northwest for this expertise in playground design, which ranges in scale from small neighborhood sites to award winning destination playgrounds in regional parks. These projects are described in detail and are illustrated in the following pages, with additional pertinent professional experience shared as well.
• Couch Park Plaza and Inclusive Playground, Portland, OR • Cook Park Inclusive Playground, Tigard, OR
• Portland Public Schools Inclusive Playground Design
Standards, Portland, OR
• Columbia Tech Center Playground, Vancouver, WA

8. New ADA Playground Kidtown Expansion:

Ben Johnson, PLA, GreenWorks

EDUCATION
Bachelor of Landscape Architecture, University of Florida

REGISTRATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS
• Professional Landscape Architect in Oregon (LA587),
California (6182)
• CLARB (2016)
AWARDS
Khunamokwst Park, Excellence in Planning, Oregon Parks
and Recreation Association, 2015
Organization Award for Outreach, Oregon Community Trees, 2014
Westmoreland Nature-Based Play Area - Americans for the Arts Public Art Network, Year in Review National Recognition to the Best in Public Art Projects Annually, 2015
Westmoreland Nature-Based Play Area - Honor Award,
Oregon Chapter of American Society of Landscape
Architects, 2014
Cape Horn Overlook* –Honor Award, Oregon Chapter of
American Society of Landscape Architects, 2012
C. Key Personnel & Qualifications
24 Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City
Couch Park Plaza and Inclusive Playground, Portland, OR GreenWorks worked with Portland Parks & Recreation on the design for updates to this beloved park’s plaza and playground in Northwest Portland. Ben led the effort for GreenWorks to design Portland’s first inclusive playground on the west side, and was designed for kids of all ages and abilities. The forward thinking design showcases vegetated stormwater planters as the primary space-maker, incorporating sustainable stormwater practices into parks and urban plazas. Ben led the project as Project Manager and Lead Landscape Architect.

Community Engagement required good listening and a thoughtful process to find consensus with stakeholder groups with competing interests. Having an iterative design process allowed us to come up with solutions that responded to stakeholders desires. Ben also participated in engaging the adjacent school which used the playground for recess time – this included one meeting at the school and one meeting where they students came to GreenWorks to see the designs and tour the office.

Cook Park Inclusive Playground,
Tigard, OR
The City of Tigard is updating the
playground design and equipment at Cook
Park, the City’s flagship community park,
to be more accessible and inclusive for
children of all abilities. Tigard has heard
from local residents that have children
with disabilities that there are not usable
playgrounds for their children to play with
others, so they hired GreenWorks to have
Ben help lead a community engagement
process as inclusive play experts and
facilitate a design competition with
playground manufacturers, as well as
lead the design process. The end result
will be a regional playground where
parents and children can congregate and
play together.

New ADA Playground Kidtown Expansion: GreenWorks
C. Key Personnel & Qualifications
Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City 25
Portland Public Schools Inclusive Playground Design
Standards, Portland, OR
GreenWorks, with Ben as the lead designer and project
manager, is working with Portland Public Schools on Inclusive Playground Standards. Triggered by an ADA Transition Plan, these guidelines will be incorporated into the district’s Special Education Specifications to guide future playground projects to be more inclusive of children of all ages and abilities. The second phase of the project includes designing three inclusive playgrounds at three different elementary schools to test the standards’ ability to inform the outcome of new and retrofit playground projects.

New ADA Playground Kidtown Expansion: GreenWorks
Columbia Tech Center Playground, Vancouver, WA
GreenWorks was hired, by a development company to design a new nature play area within the Columbia Tech Center in Vancouver, Washington. Columbia Tech Center is a 410-acre mixed use development that includes a 12-acre park that promotes a live-work balance for the community. The new 25,000 square foot playground, led by Ben as the designer and project manager, has become the heart of the park
and has become a significant amenity for the development and a destination for children in Vancouver. The design for the playground encompasses a broad spectrum of play
experiences for children of all ages and abilities including a sand and water play area, boulder and log climbing, a large mound with a climbing tower, embankment slide, rope bridge, and discovery area with trails, musical instruments, log fort, and densely planted mounds so children can
imagine they are in a forest.

C. Key Personnel & Qualifications
26 Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City

PASSION
Susan Jurasz’s life has involved planning and designing unique visitor experiences via interpretation and art for several decades. Passionate about engaging peoples minds and hearts (of all ages and abilities), Susan is a rare interpretive specialist.

She began Sea Reach Ltd, a design/build interpretive firm in 1985 and has completed literally thousands of projects ranging from $2500 to $1,000,000. Clients include federal, state, and local organizations (both public and private) all over the United States. Projects also include international work in Canada, Jordan, China, and Brazil.

PATHS OF CULTURE
The three projects attached depict different approaches to cultural and natural history paths. An important characteristic in all three projects is the element of surprise. The installations impart relevant information in a way that satisfies the senses and entices a visitor to want more.

On all of these projects, Susan leads with an interpretive plan - it is her vision for what the visitor’s experience will feel and look like, that starts the process. She leads the Sea Reach team - developing content, overseeing and influencing design, and in these examples, Susan also assists in aspects of the fabrication within the Sea Reach shop and installation.

Being involved in projects from start to finish with a handons approach, is the mode of operation for both Sea Reach principals (Susan Jurasz and Peter Reedijk). As a creative duo, they have been designing and implementing projects across the nation for over 35 years.

Critical to producing long lasting exhibits, Susan has acquired a solid understanding of manufacturing processes, materials and their properties, and what works in an outdoor environment from intense sun to salt. She can speak from experience - describing the properties of metal alloys, hardware, sign panel materials, speciality printing processes, adhesives, finishes, and installation methods.
• East Bay Plaza, Olympia, Washington (award winning)
• Lewis Clark Corps of Discovery, St Helens, Oregon
• Auke Lake Trail, Juneau, Alaska

9. Paths of Culture: Susan Jurasz, Sea Reach Ltd.

EDUCATION
1988 Richard Rush Studio, Chicago, Illinois: Internship. 1986 University of Alaska, Juneau Alaska: Graduate Courses. 1985 Lewis and Clark College, Portland, OR: B.A. Fine Arts, B.S. Natural Sciences.
1984 American Museum of Natural History, New York, New
York: Internship
1978 University of Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California:

Undergraduate study.
1977 University of Alaska, Fairbanks, Alaska: Undergraduate study.

AWARDS
ASLA Merit Award (Gresham Signage Masterplan, Oregon);
Byway Best Practices Award (Historic
Columbia River Highway, Oregon); USDA Certificate of
Appreciation (National Recreation Strategy
Partner, National); Advocacy Planning Award (The Design Guide, National), Byways Best Practices Award
(Sheyenne River Valley National Scenic Byway, North
Dakota), SEGD Award for excellence in design and
fabrication (Great Salt Lake Shorelands Preserve, Utah).

Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Award
for excellence (Lowell Covered Bridge, Oregon).

EMPLOYMENT
1985- Present - Sea Reach Ltd., president
Business management, project management, exhibit design, site/access planning, interpretive writing, marketing.

C. Key Personnel & Qualifications
Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City 27
East Bay Plaza, Olympia, Washington
East Bay Plaza is downtown Olympia outside the LOTT (Lacey, Olympia, Tumwater, and Thurston County) water treatment center. At one end of the property is the Children’s Museum. The plaza is an urban open space with unique features and amenities in the heart of the East Bay district. The plaza features a wading stream and a demonstration wetland, both fed by Class A Reclaimed Water.

Sea Reach was contracted by Robert Droll Landscape Architects to help imagine an outdoor space in an urban setting that would celebrate water. Susan’s team designed a series of mosaics using a patented process called Lithomosaic. The Lithomosaic process developed by Robin Brailsford allows the artist to layout the mosaic in a studio on a cloth and then, roll it and take it to the site for installation.

Paths of Culture: Sea Reach Ltd.

C. Key Personnel & Qualifications
28 Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City
Lewis and Clark Corps of Discovery, St Helens, Oregon
The City of St. Helens contracted Sea Reach to
develop a cultural history story featuring the
Corps of Discovery in the last leg of their journey
to the Pacific Ocean highlighting the interactions
with the local tribes and their discoveries. Susan
designed a path of tiles that feature diary entires
and embedded artifacts and impressions to tell the
story. The plaza features over a dozen custom Sea
Reach lithomosaic designs.

Paths of Culture: Sea Reach Ltd.

Auke Lake Trail, Juneau Alaska
The City and Borough of Juneau, Alaska contracted Sea Reach to develop a trailside visitor experience. While visitors to Juneau, may venture out to the lake and discover this trail, it is well loved by residents. Adding a set of traditional 2x3 interpretive exhibits along this trail would feel out-of-place, particularly to families that know every turn and water crossing.

The approach to the trail’s interpretation began with a plan to make the exhibits feel more integrated with the landscape: smaller, irregularlyshaped, and with the client’s consent, placed in view of the trail, but not actually on the path. This would encourage hikers to leave the trail to discover a set of exhibits just out of sight. The first exhibit in each series is visible from the gravel path, but you cannot see the other three that accompany it until you are standing next to the first one.

This creates a little bit of a treasure hunt. One of the exhibit in each series has a QR code and a bronze medallion with a thematic icon.

There were 36 exhibits along the trail and trailhead orientation exhibits that set up the experience.

C. Key Personnel & Qualifications
Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City 29
During his practice as a Landscape Architect, Mike has had the opportunity to plan and design on several different types and sizes of amphitheaters.

Amphitheaters are outdoor venues that allow many people to gather with a focus on entertainment. They have proven to be important revenue-generators for Parks, Zoos, and a wide variety of public and private organizations.

There are several issues that must be addressed when
designing an amphitheater, and which we will consider when engaged in the siting and design of the Amphitheater for Beachfront Park.

From a visitor use perspective, the key issues are:
• Accessibility for people with disabilities
• View angles
• Types of seating preferred
From an event management perspective, the key issues are:
• Access control for ticketed events
• Emergency services access
• Sound impacts on adjacent neighborhoods
• Permanent or temporary stage, amplification and lighting systems
• “Back of house” areas for performers
There are also several environmental issues to be considered:
• Site drainage
• Site Utilities
• Turf recovery (if using lawn)
• Viewing and solar orientation
Though others on our design team also have experience in the design of amphitheaters, Mike Abbaté has worked on these specific projects:
• Athey Creek Church Amphitheater, West Linn, OR
• Gresham Center for the Arts Plaza, Gresham, OR
• Independence Plaza and Amphitheater,
• Independence, OR
• Oregon Zoo Concert Amphitheater, Portland, OR
These projects are described and illustrated in the following pages.

10. Amphitheater: Mike Abbaté, PLA, Abbaté Designs

EDUCATION
Bachelor of Landscape Architecture
Cal Poly University, Pomona
• Magna cum laude
• Howard O. Boltz Medal as Outstanding Landscape
Architecture student
• Certificate of Honor, American Society of Landscape
Architects
• Distinguished Alumnus, 2007
Certificate in Business Administration
Portland State University

ACCREDITATIONS AND MEMBERSHIPS
• Registered Landscape Architect (Oregon, Washington,
Alaska, nationwide through CLARB)
• LEED Accredited Professional
• American Society of Landscape Architects
• Council of Fellows, American Society of Landscape
Architects
• National Recreation and Parks Association
C. Key Personnel & Qualifications
30 Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City
Oregon Zoo Concert Amphitheater, Portland, OR
One of the most popular concert venues in the state,
the large grassy Oregon Zoo Concert Amphitheater
has hosted world renown performers and acts. Mike
Abbaté served as the landscape architect for this
project, while associated with another firm. This
has become an incredibly important revenue stream
for the zoo, which is operated by Metro, the threecounty regional government.

There is seating for up to 5,000 people in the large,
sloped lawn and seat wall terraces. The new raised
stage features a sculptural cover overhead, easy
access from the amphitheater and a beautiful water
feature that contains a few inches of water but can
be filled to create a 48” deep baptismal for up to four people at a time amongst the tall firs.

Amphitheater: Abbaté Designs
Gresham Center for the Arts Plaza and Children’s Fountain This 2 acre park in the heart of the fourth largest city in Oregon, serves as a new public gathering space for the community. The Arts Plaza hosts a popular summer concert series. Though it is visually striking, there is an intraicate number of measures to give the city of Gresham maximum flexibility to host various types of concerts, ceremonies and other large public events. The Children’s fountain can be turned off to allow for seating to be installed, a terraced plaza was created to ensure good audience sight lines, electrical, and sound hookups are available for event acts and producers. This dynamic public space is the home to many festivals, gatherings, concerts and of course waterplay in the Children’s Fountain.

C. Key Personnel & Qualifications
Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City 31
Amphitheater: Abbaté Designs
Independence Plaza and Amphitheater (GW Project)
This new gateway plaza for Independence, OR features a major public plaza, a Veteran’s memorial, an iconic fountain, and an amphitheater for upwards of 5,000 people. The amphitheater was build into the sloping site, with the upper plaza at the street level serving as the place for queuing and meeting people. It also acts as a crowd control device. The creation of this new public space has led to a major downtown revitalization of this small town with a population of just over 10,000 people. While with GreenWorks, Mike Abbaté served as the design principal in charge and coordinated with the City Manager and City staff to plan, design and construct this new amenity.

C. Key Personnel & Qualifications
32 Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City
Athey Creek Church Outdoor Amphitheater
This 2-acre portion of the Athey Creek campus will be used for outdoor services, concerts, and other events. Creating an attractive outdoor space includes a new stage and water feature, a gathering area at the base of the stage, separated public and service access, protecting existing large trees, and arced seating walls. There is seating for up to 5,000 people in the large, sloped lawn and seat wall terraces. The new raised stage features a sculptural cover overhead, easy access from the amphitheater and a beautiful water feature that contains a few inches of water but can be filled to create a 48” deep baptismal for up to four people at a time amongst the tall firs.

Amphitheater: Abbaté Designs
C. Key Personnel & Qualifications
Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City 33
Matthew is a landscape architect and project manager with over 15 years of professional experience. He has contributed to projects across the Pacific Northwest and California including waterfront designs, campus designs, downtown parks and
green infrastructure. His projects emphasize environmental responsibility and strive to support a culture of exploration in the landscape. Matthew works closely with clients to create projects that have special meaning for their cities and communities.

When Matthew is outside the design studio, you may find him exploring the regional hills on his mountain bike or supporting the local trail stewards on community trail building days.

When Matthew is outside the design studio, you may find him exploring the regional hills on his mountain bike or supporting the local trail stewards on community trail building days.

Some of the key parks projects where he has led
interdisciplinary teams include:
• Terminal 1 Waterfront, Vancouver, WA
• Independence Landing, Independence OR
• UC Santa Cruz Coastal Biology Campus, Santa
• Cruz, CA
These projects are described and illustrated in the
following pages.

11. Waterfront Plaza: Matt Crampton, PLA, GreenWorks

EDUCATION
MA, Landscape Architecture, University of
California at Berkeley.

BS, Environmental Psychology, Wesleyan
University
Postgraduate Studies, Architecture, Portland
State University

REGISTRATIONS
Professional Landscape Architect in Oregon (LA0819)
AWARDS
Eisner Landscape Design Award 2008 - UC Berkeley
Tommy Church Award 2006 - UC Berkeley

AREAS OF EXPERTISE
Landscape Architecture
Urban Planning and Design
Trail Design
Park & Open Space Planning
C. Key Personnel & Qualifications
34 Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City
Independence Landing Independence, OR
Matthew served as senior landscape architect and project manager when developing this waterfront park, the first implementation of a master plan completed by Greenworks in 2015. He worked with the City of Independence, OR to develop this key piece of public waterfront located immediately south of Riverview Park, the flagship of the Independence park system. Designed in tandem with the with the large waterfront re-development on the old Valley Concrete Site, Independence Landing is one piece in a larger orchestrated effort to revitalize downtown Independence and support commercial growth.

Included in the plan are a waterfront multi-use trail with a river overlook, a shaded patio and lawn space able to accommodate flexible programming, a sizeable restoration planting area braided by soft surface trails and a grove of shade trees in which the user can find informal, private seating areas. This implementation of the Open Space Master Plan sets the stage for the continued expansion of improved public waterfront southward along the Willamette River and strengthens the downtown, pedestrian connections to the waterfront.

Waterfront Plaza: GreenWorks
C. Key Personnel & Qualifications
Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City 35
UC Santa Cruz Coastal Biology Campus, Santa Cruz, CA
The Coastal Biology Campus is the first built implementation of the Coastal Biology Campus master plan. Designed to provide a natural transition from the built environment to the coastal wetlands, this project attempts to meld into the California coastal aesthetic by prioritizing the natural beauty of the coastline ecosystems. The resulting aesthetic draws from native plant communities, local materials, ecological function and subtle detailing.

Waterfront Plaza: GreenWorks
Matthew served as landscape architect and construction
administrator when bringing this project to life. Supporting his design ethos, this project demonstrates a prioritization of sustainable design. He worked closely with the engineering and architectural team to maximize solar exposure to public spaces while providing protection from predominant wind patterns, protect the sensitive hydrology of the site and neighboring wetlands, and ensure the preservation of open space and associated public viewing.

C. Key Personnel & Qualifications
36 Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City
Terminal 1, Vancouver, WA
Matthew worked with Port of Vancouver on a vibrant new urban development project along the Columbia River. Reflecting the industrial history of the site with modern amenities, the design includes development of public outdoor spaces, plazas, seating areas, boardwalks, stormwater gardens, and trails.

As the senior landscape designer for this project, Matthew lead a multi-disciplinary team through the visioning, design and construction of complex site improvements developed on a post-industrial fill site as well as on top of a pre-existing pier.

Waterfront Plaza: GreenWorks
C. Key Personnel & Qualifications
Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City 37

BUSINESS MANAGEMENT
On a daily basis, Susan works with her creative team overseeing the process from start to finish, maintains quality control on products and deliverables, oversees business finances, and reviews project budgets. Sea Reach ranges from 12-20 full time employees — all of whom report directly to Susan.

PROJECTS LARGE OR SMALL
With thirty-five years of experience in the field of interpretation, exhibit planning, and design — Susan’s company, 100% womanowned, has been providing vision to client’s storylines and landscapes. Working collaboratively, susan enjoys the dynamics of a team who understand the importance of every detail. To make site cohesive and to create an experience worth sharing with others, it requires good communication, intentional design, and a united effort. This tenacity to excellence is part of every project Susan works on regardless of size.

GENERAL CONTRACTOR IN WA AND OR
Susan holds general contractor’s licenses in Oregon and Washington. This license is renewed on an annual basis with continuing education regarding codes, safety and construction methods. Susan has been responsible for acquiring building permits, meeting with inspectors, choosing materials, fixtures, developing electrical, heating, and plumbing plans, and phasing the project to match budget constraints and subcontractor’s schedules.

INTERPRETIVE WORKSHOPS & PRESENTATIONS
Conducted interpretive workshops in planning and design at national and international conferences ; presentations regarding materials specifications for outdoor interpretive projects, and accessible interpretive programs. Presented to design commissions, city councils, public meetings, and project partners.

Key Projects on the following pages:
• Spring Mountains National Recreation Area, Nevada
• Chambers Covered Railroad Bridge, Cottage Grove,
Oregon (award winning)

12. Tolowa Cultural Interpretive Area: Susan Jurasz, Sea Reach Ltd.

EDUCATION
1988 Richard Rush Studio, Chicago, Illinois: Internship. 1986 University of Alaska, Juneau Alaska: Graduate Courses. 1985 Lewis and Clark College, Portland, OR: B.A. Fine Arts, B.S. Natural Sciences.
1984 American Museum of Natural History, New York, New
York: Internship
1978 University of Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California:

Undergraduate study.
1977 University of Alaska, Fairbanks, Alaska: Undergraduate study.

AWARDS
ASLA Merit Award (Gresham Signage Masterplan, Oregon);
Byway Best Practices Award (Historic
Columbia River Highway, Oregon); USDA Certificate of
Appreciation (National Recreation Strategy
Partner, National); Advocacy Planning Award (The Design Guide, National), Byways Best Practices Award
(Sheyenne River Valley National Scenic Byway, North
Dakota), SEGD Award for excellence in design and
fabrication (Great Salt Lake Shorelands Preserve, Utah).

Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Award
for excellence (Lowell Covered Bridge, Oregon).

C. Key Personnel & Qualifications
38 Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City
Chambers Covered Railroad Bridge, Cottage Grove, Oregon (award winning) In the 1920s, an Oregon pioneer built a lumber mill to cash in on the rich rain forests of the Pacific Northwest. The mill was separated from the main railline by a river, so he constructed a covered bridge just large enough for an engine and rail trucks full of logs to pass through. The mill closed in the late 1950s, and the bridge was left to decay. Money was raised to rehabilitate the bridge (on the national register of historic structures). Sea Reach was sub-contracted first by the engineering firm to develop plan and design the interpretive experience for the site and then, by the general contractor to fabricate and install the exhibits.

Today, the bridge is entered via a “grand staircase” that leads to a lifesize silhouette of the engine that once chugged through, laden with logs and lumber. Smaller exhibits share the history of the railroad, the mill and the town, present the story of the rehabilitation of the bridge, and suggest where to visit other covered bridges. Outside is another life size front view of the train (as if it had just passed through the bridge). This one doubles as an engaging climbing structure for kids and adults.

The Chambers Covered Railroad project was honored with several awards for ingenuity in the interpretive experience and for the engineering and design. Susan lead this project from inception to completion. Oversaw all of the planning, interpretive workshops with the client, content development, design, fabrication and installation. She was an integral part of every aspect of this project.

Paths of Culture: Sea Reach Ltd.

C. Key Personnel & Qualifications
Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City 39
Paths of Culture: Sea Reach Ltd.

The Great Salt Lake Shorelands Preserve, Layton, Utah (award winning) The Nature Conservancy (TNC) developed an interpretive site along the Great Salt Lake in Utah. The Board of Advisors, TNC staff, and consultants (including Sea Reach) met to design an interface between visitors and the Preserve. It was unanimously decided that this site should be different than all others. Rather than a visitor learning about the outdoors while inside a building (a visitor center), we decided design a visitor experience that would immerse them into the sights, sounds, and textures of the wetland.

The concept of “nature by design” fulfills itself at this location. The exhibits are an aesthetic blend of art and science—each node offers an unusual twist in the boardwalk and a unique set of exhibits. This project received international recognition for its excellence in design and fabrication by the Society of Environmental Graphic Designers (SEGD).

Susan Jurasz lead The Nature Conservancy through the interpretive process.

She and her Sea Reach team, notably creative director, Peter Reedijk, did all the interpretive planning and design for this project. Sea Reach was also contracted to fabricate and install. Susan saw this project through from beginning to end as an active project manager and producer.

C. Key Personnel & Qualifications
40 Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City
For more than 21 years, Stuart has worked on a wide range of projects, from basic structures to intricate, complex, and eye-catching designs. Highly responsive to client requests, he is invested in helping realize the aesthetic vision and programming needs of the project. Stuart’s vast experience in both building and bridge engineering allows him to examine challenges from a unique perspective. He has worked with a wide range of materials and produced an array of successful systems for new and renovated structures. Stuart draws upon this versatility and project diversity to produce new concepts that inform the design and has successfully filled the role of structural project manager on multiple recent coastal projects along the Pacific coastline as well as more than 30 parks and recreation projects throughout Oregon, Washington, and California.

Stuart’s relationship with Greenworks covers more than 15 years and numerous recreation projects, including projects along the Pacific coastline. Stuart’s design experience comprises all types of recreation structures, including canopies, interpretive signage, boardwalks, and retaining walls.

Some of the key park projects Stuart has worked on with relevant details include:
• Cape Disappointment State Park (with Greenworks), Ilwaco, WA • Red Electric Trail (with Greenworks), Portland, OR
• Newport Beach Access Study (with Greenworks), Newport, OR • Loma Alta Beach Boardwalk, Oceanside, CA
• Coquille Point Beach Access, Bandon, OR
These projects are described and illustrated in the following pages.

13. Structural: Stuart Finney, KPFF Engineering Consultants

EDUCATION
MEng, Engineering Science, Oxford University, England
BEng, Engineering Science, Oxford University, England

REGISTRATIONS
Professional Structural Engineer, OR
Professional Engineer, WA, OR

AFFILIATIONS
American Institute of Steel Construction
Structural Engineers Association of Oregon
American Society of Civil Engineers
C. Key Personnel & Qualifications
Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City 41
Cape Disappointment State Park, Ilwaco, WA *
Working with artist Maya Lin and landscape architect
GreenWorks, KPFF provided structural and civil engineering services for improvements to Cape Disappointment State
Park at the mouth of the Columbia River. The work was
part of the bicentennial celebrations of the Lewis and Clark expedition and included new pedestrian bridges, a 1,500sf elevated boardwalk, an overlook, an amphitheater, and a stone-clad concrete pier. Work also included a 12-foot by 15-foot fish cleaning station constructed of Columbia River basalt cantilevered over the existing riverbank, a viewing platform facing Ilwaco, a new restroom, and a 60-foot to 80-foot diameter “totem circle” that required a foundation system to support a large number of poles. Civil work
included redesigning a parking lot to accommodate buses and RVs as well trucks with boat trailers, creating a swale system that appears to be sand dunes, utility extensions to two new comfort stations, and rip rap repair.

Structural: KPFF Engineering Consultants
Red Electric Trail, Portland, OR *
KPFF is providing project management, structural and civil engineering for this multi-phased project that includes the design and construction of a trail and a shared pedestrian and bicycle bridge crossing over a ravine. The project
involves approximately 700 feet of new trail through steep terrain, heavy vegetation, and an environmentally protected canyon. The proposed 250-foot-long, 5-span, curved steel girder bridge will be connected to a combination of elevated walkways and retaining walls at on-grade sections of the alignment. The trail and bridge alignments were designed to limit impacts to adjacent properties.
*Projects with GreenWoks.

C. Key Personnel & Qualifications
Cape Disappointment State Park Red Electric Trail Red Electric Trail 42 Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City
Newport Beach Access Study, Newport, OR *
Serving as the Prime Consultant, KPFF provided structural engineering services to evaluate a eleven existing beach access points in Newport, OR and provide a concept-level seismic evaluation and concept-level seismic retrofits for the beach access points. Work included developing retrofit and realignment schemes to connect beach access to
existing City streets.
* Project with GreenWorks
Loma Alta Beach Wetland Restoration Boardwalk,
Oceanside, CA
KPFF is providing structural engineering services for an approximately 50-to-100-foot-long boardwalk. The boardwalk will be less than 30 inches above grade, eliminating the need for pedestrian rails. The structure is founded on highly liquifiable sand and is designed to accommodate substantial movement of the underlying subgrade during a major seismic event. Durable materials were selected with input from the owner to reduce future maintenance requirements.

Coquille Point Beach Access, Bandon, OR
KPFF provided structural engineering services (in addition to project management, civil design, and survey) for the rehabilitation, and strengthening of the existing timberframed beach access structure at Coquille Point near Bandon, OR. The 260-foot-long existing timber structure is located on a sloping bluff that continues to move laterally due to the underlying soil conditions. KPFF developed alternates to address the effects of this “landsliding,” including inspection and maintenance procedures that could be cost-effectively implemented by the owner.

The owner had previously closed the stair due to safety concerns associated with the soil-induced lateral movement.

KPFF inspected the structure and provided recommendations to the owner, allowing the re-opening of the stair to the public for a limited period, until a long-term solution could be implemented.

Structural: KPFF Engineering Consultants
C. Key Personnel & Qualifications
Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City 43
Matt is a permitting and hydrology specialist with over 19 years of experience in environmental compliance, coastal systems, and aquatic system investigations. He has worked with government agencies to complete federal, state, and local permitting compliance with NEPA, CEQA, Clean Water Act, and Endangered Species Act for projects in Oregon and California, and has conducted pollutant monitoring of NPDES permitted infrastructure. Matt is also an experienced project manager, coordinating between stakeholders’ processes to achieve project goals and deadlines and maintaining communication through annual reports of monitoring efforts.

In his role at Camas, LLC, Matt manages multiple projects including permitting and regulatory compliance for a large wind farm in the Mojave Desert of southern California, design and environmental review for repairs to a municipal drinking water system on the Oregon coast, regulatory processes for Klamath River dam removals, and development of a Water
Management and Conservation Plan for an irrigation district in Hood River County, Oregon. His background in coastal systems includes water quality and habitat investigations on the northcentral California coast and the design and regulatory process to construct a large artificial reef in southern California.

This experience in federal, state, and local regulation in California and Oregon, project coordination, and aquatic science has helped him build a broad background to tackle complex projects with interdisciplinary teams. Matt regularly coordinates with agency regulators, funding agencies, lawyers, municipal and district officials, engineers, and architects to find solutions and complete complex projects efficiently.

Some of the key regulatory projects he has led or supported include:
• Klamath Dam Removal Project, OR and CA*
• Middle Fork Irrigation District Water Management and
Conservation Plan, OR
• Palos Verdes Reef Restoration Project, CA
• Harbor Water People’s Utility District Drinking Water Rehabilitation, OR
These projects are described and illustrated in the following pages.

14. Permitting: Matt Robart, Camas LLC

EDUCATION
Oregon State University
Fisheries Science, Bachelor of Science
University of California - Davis
Ecology, Master of Science

SPECIALIZATIONS
• Compliance Management
• Agricultural and Municipal Water Supply
• Project Management
• Sustainability and Conservation
• Regulatory Approvals
• Marine and Freshwater Species Monitoring
• Water Quality
• Data Management
* Project with GreenWorks
C. Key Personnel & Qualifications
44 Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City
Klamath River Renewal Project, Klamath County, OR and Siskiyou County, CA Matt has been working to support regulatory processes for the Klamath River Renewal Project, the largest dam removal effort in the U.S. to-date. The project will remove four hydroelectric dams from the Klamath River to reestablish anadromous fish migration to hundreds of miles of river and tributary habitat. The project has undergone CEQA and NEPA review, Endangered Species Act compliance, Clean Water Act Sections 401, 402, and 404 requirements, Coastal Zone Management Act consistency, and dozens of other federal, state, and local regulatory requirements and permits.

In support of this project, Matt has developed several site management plans including the Water Quality Monitoring Plans for California and Oregon and the Public Drinking Water and Water Supply management plans for California, and has overseen the development of numerous other planning documents and permits. He recently coordinated closely with the California Coastal Commission for a consistency evaluation under the Coastal Zone Management Act and has been working as part of a broader team with the California State Water Resources Control Board to update the CEQA documents in support of an updated Clean Water Act Section 401 certification.

Permitting Approach for Crescent City
Based on the activities described in the City’s RFQ, it is anticipated that the Project will require preparation of an Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND), which will be determined through early consultation with the City and state resource agencies. The IS/MND will undergo a 30-day public comment period, at which time the California Coastal Commission (CCC) and other state agencies will have the opportunity to provide input on the Project. Input received from the CCC during the CEQA process will confirm CCC and the City’s requirements under the Coastal Zone Management Act and Local Coastal Program, and it is anticipated that a Coastal Development Permit will be required. Camas will prepare the permit application and will augment the application following an initial review by CCC staff. Following a 30-day review period, once CCC staff consider the application complete, they will write a staff report for the Commissioners, who then have 180 days to act on the application at a public hearing.

Additionally, because the Project will disturb an area greater than 1 acre, it will require a Construction General Permit (CGP) from the North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board. Camas will develop a Stormwater Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) in coordination with a Qualified SWPPP Developer and obtain the CGP.

Permitting: Camas LLC
C. Key Personnel & Qualifications
Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City 45
Middle Fork Irrigation District Water Management and
Conservation Plan, OR
Matt developed a document to replace the previous (2011) version of the Water Management and Conservation Plan for the Middle Fork Irrigation District. This plan adheres to the requirements of the Oregon Water Resources Department for agricultural water suppliers. Development of the plan involved coordination with district administrators to obtain accurate information regarding water rights, infrastructure, conservation accounting, and procedures for allocation and curtailment. Plan development also required outreach to stakeholders including neighboring municipalities and irrigation districts, tribes, and resource management agencies, as well as regulators from the Oregon Water Resources Department.

Permitting: Camas LLC
C. Key Personnel & Qualifications
46 Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City
Palos Verdes Reef Restoration Project, CA
Matt worked with government agencies to complete federal, state, and local permitting compliance with NEPA, CEQA, Clean Water Act, and ESA for a 70-acre restoration reef project on the Palos Verdes Peninsula in Southern California. This involved artificial reef design, coordination between federal and state entities to acquire CWA Section 401 and 404 approvals, working with the California State Lands Commission on the CEQA
process, and acquiring a Coastal Development Permit from the California Coastal Commission. Reef construction was completed in 2020.

Permitting: Camas LLC
Harbor Water People’s Utility District Drinking Water
Rehabilitation, OR
Matt currently manages a project to repair and protect the drinking water collector for the community of Harbor, Oregon.

The collector is located on the Chetco River, and has experienced significant erosion in recent years, leading to saltwater intrusion to the water supply and putting the structure at risk of collapse during high-water events.

Matt oversees a group of engineers who have completed
a structural and seismic analysis of the structure and are finalizing designs to protect the collector and riverbank from further erosion.

Matt is also pursuing funding opportunities through FEMA and the State of Oregon, and oversees the environmental review process including coordination with National Marine Fisheries Service, Army Corps of Engineers, Oregon Department of
Environmental Quality, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, and Oregon Division of State Lands.

C. Key Personnel & Qualifications
Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City 47
Robert is a skilled electrical engineer with 18 years of experience designing systems for community spaces,
government buildings, higher education facilities, K-12 schools, and commercial offices.

Through his diverse project experience and analytical savvy, Robert is skilled at providing innovative, maintainable, and reliable engineering solutions. As a Revit and AutoCAD subject matter expert, Robert utilizes computer modeling and analysis to fully develop construction documents.

His enthusiasm for forging collaborative relationships through good communication creates cohesive teams and successful designs.

Some of the key relevant projects where he has work with interdisciplinary teams include:
• Albany Waterfront Redevelopment, Albany, OR
• Eugene Town Center Farmers Market, Eugene, OR
• Eugene Riverfront Park, Phase I, Eugene, OR
These projects are described and illustrated in the following pages.

15. Electrical: Robert Mills, PAE

EDUCATION
University of Texas - San Antonio
Electrical Engineering, Bachelor of Science

REGISTRATIONS
Proffesional Engineer: OR, WA, TX, AZ, NV
C. Key Personnel & Qualifications
48 Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City
Eugene Town Center Farmers Market, Eugene, OR
Adjacent to the new City Hall, this development of a new Pavilion and Plaza will provide a year-round location to host the Lane County Farmers Market. The new Pavilion, which features roll-up doors to integrate indoor and outdoor space, is fully designed and constructed with cross-laminated timber.

Additionally, an expanded plaza provides additional space for vendors and recreational activities.

With Robert serving as Electrical Engineer of Record, PAE provided full MEP scope for the project, including lighting and technology, as well as sustainable design recommendations.

Albany Waterfront Redevelopment, Albany, OR
Designed to be a free, public space connecting the downtown area to the river, the Albany Waterfront Redevelopment is comprised of 13 acres of public parks and outdoor space, and 14 blocks of adjacent street reconstruction and streetscape.

As Project Manager and Engineer of Record, Robert provided electrical engineering design for the redevelopment, which includes new park facilities, improved street crossings, and access to the water. The waterfront is poised to become a premier venue for a variety of events, attracting visitors to downtown Albany.

Electrial: PAE
C. Key Personnel & Qualifications
Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City 49
Eugene Riverfront Park, Phase I, Eugene, OR
Robert served as Electrical Engineer of Record
for this park project, which is comprised of
three acres of urban waterfront design on the
Willamette River, alongside a one-acre public
plaza. Designed to revitalize the greater riverfront
as the heart of downtown Eugene, the park boasts
many river overlooks and open views. Located just
across the river from Alton Baker Park, the new
riverfront connects the University of Oregon’s
campus riverfront area to downtown Eugene.

Electrical: PAE
C. Key Personnel & Qualifications
50 Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City
Paul is an award-winning landscape architect, professional engineer, and Professional Wetland Scientist Emeritus bringing over 25 years of leadership in parks master planning and design, in natural resources restoration and public infrastructure, and projects with extensive public involvement and stakeholder engagement skills. Much of his work has addressed resilient design starting with a design approach centered in site analysis and understanding natural processes as guiding principles for shaping projects. His work is characterized by natureinspired forms, activating sites with Low Impact Development Approaches (LIDA) to stormwater management, and by
extensive use of native plant materials.

Paul’s early professional life was heavily influenced by his work for the US Geological Survey Water Resources Division in Alaska. While completing graduate school in landscape architecture in Seattle he worked for Washington State Parks & Recreation as a Planner in the Scenic Rivers Program.

Afterwards, he settled in Portland and was an early member of Portland’s Stormwater Advisory Committee. After a decade in consulting, he co-founded Vigil-Agrimis, Inc. with Ken Vigil and operated the civil engineering/landscape architecture/ natural resources consulting firm for 14 years before merging with Environmental Science Associates. Vigil-Agrimis earned a reputation for resilient design in parks, stream restoration, and wetland restoration.

Paul is an accomplished project manager who has led dozens of complex projects. He has shaped resilient projects in various ways including: designing recreation facilities on reclaimed lands, transforming low function landscapes to higher function landscapes, using coastal processes and natural materials to protect civic and natural infrastructure, and leading brownfield transformations of a landfill. He approaches resilient design as an opportunity to work with natural processes to make sites more functional, more attractive, and more durable.

These projects are described in detail and are illustrated in the following pages:
• Lower Klamath River Five Recreation Sites Design
and Construction Documents, Klamath County, OR and
Siskiyou County, CA
• Chehalem Heritage Trails Campground, Yamhill County,
OR
• Birch Bay Drive and Pedestrian Facilities, Whatcom
County, WA
• Cully Park Master Plan and Phase 1 Design, Portland, OR

16. Resilient Design: Paul Agrimis, PLA, PE, GreenWorks

EDUCATION
MLA, Landscape Architecture, University of Washington
BSE, Civil Engineering, University of Connecticut

REGISTRATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS
• Professional Landscape Architect, Washington (640)
• Registered Landscape Architect: Oregon (319), Alaska (13, 234)
• Professional Engineer: Washington (33054), Oregon
(14,851), Alaska (7,093)
• Professional Wetland Scientist Emeritus

PROFESSIONAL RECOGNITION (SELECTED)
• American Society of Landscape Architects Awards -
Oregon Chapter
• People’s Choice Award (2019) for 185-acre Riley Ranch Nature Reserve Management Plan, Bend Park &
Recreation District
• Merit Award and Peoples’ Choice Award (2018) for 25-Acre Cully Community Park, Portland Parks & Recreation
• Distinguished Practitioner (2016) inaugural award given to practitioners who have shaped landscape architecture in Oregon
• Merit Award (2013) for 165-acre Minto-Island Park
Floodplain Restoration, Salem Parks & Recreation
C. Key Personnel & Qualifications
Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City 51
Lower Klamath River Five Recreation Sites Design and Construction Documents, Klamath County, OR and Siskiyou County, CA*
Paul is the Principal in Charge for this transformation of the Lower Klamath River that will include five new recreation sites after four hydroelectric dams are removed. The scope includes designing resilient recreation facilities: water access for boating and non-boating interests, picnicking, trails, restrooms.

GreenWorks is leading a multidisciplinary team that convened a predesign tour with the Klamath and Shasta Tribes, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Bureau of Land Management, and a variety of stakeholders. The sites will be raw after reservoir drawdowns and as new streamflow patterns are established so the team is considering projected floodplain function and materials that fit the beautiful and sometimes stark landscapes.

Designs will be completed in 2023; reservoir drawdowns will begin in 2024 with construction following 2024-2025.

Resilient Design: GreenWorks
Birch Bay Drive and Pedestrian Facilities,
Whatcom County, WA*
Paul was Project Manager for this complex twomile beach nourishment, natural resources management, and pedestrian trail project. The
project team prepared a beach nourishment
berm design using 110,000 cubic yards of native
gravels and sand that dramatically reduced King
Tide flooding while also improving forage fish
and nearshore habitat while providing a hard/soft
surface trail along a busy road where pedestrians
previously used the road shoulder.

Paul led the public involvement with multiple
stakeholders; he conducted key stakeholder
interviews to inform project planning; he led all
three community open-house events. This project
included extensive natural resources analysis
for an Environmental Assessment (Washington
State Environmental Policy Act); coordination
with Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife
(WDFW), Corps of Engineers, and NOAA Fisheries.

Construction was $1.1M and was completed over
two seasons in 2020.

C. Key Personnel & Qualifications
* Project completed at another firm
52 Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City
Cully Park Master Plan and Phase 1 Design, Portland, OR Paul was the Principal in Charge and Project Manager for the master plan and Phase 1 development of this 25-acre community park in the Cully neighborhood of NE Portland that set the vision for transforming an active landfill into a community park 2007/2018.

There were numerous environmental and geotechnical issues (management of methane gas and landfill leachate, differential settlement, wetlands, etc.) that needed to be skillfully addressed to accommodate a Phase 1 program that includes several athletic fields, exercise facilities, and trails. He led the team in creating a safe and engaging park amidst a mixture of adjacent industrial, commercial, and residential land uses with very limited existing pedestrian access. Paul worked closely with the Tribal community, PP&R, and partner Verde to create a Native Gathering Garden which has native plants to be used by Native American elders for ceremonial fibers and food. The Phase 1 site also includes a youth soccer field, exercise loop, trails, restrooms, picnic facilities, community garden expansion, off-leash dog area, and a 900-foot green street reconstruction of NE 72nd Avenue as the entry to the park. This was a $13M construction effort completed in 2018.

Resilient Design: GreenWorks
C. Key Personnel & Qualifications
* Project completed at another firm
Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City 53
Ron is an accomplished landscape architect with over 35 years of professional experience in design, documentation, technical direction, mentoring and quality management. His work
features award winning design assignments encompassing
a diverse variety of project types, ranging from public and private plazas and courtyards to parks, housing, streetscapes, landscape restorations, and green infrastructure. He has worked professionally in California, Colorado, Oregon, and Texas on projects throughout the United States.

Recently, while leading the firm’s quality management efforts, Ron has been involved in all aspects of quality assessment and implementation. He has developed several quality control and work management mechanisms to ensure that all work
products are exceptional, timely, and complete.

The Internal quality assurance process Ron developed below illustrates the control baseline used to produce an effective documented drawing package delivered with the highest
regard for quality, on time and within budget.

17. Quality Control: Ron Tendick, PLA, GreenWorks

EDUCATION
Bachelor’s degree in Landscape Architecture from Texas
Tech University

REGISTRATION/CERTIFICATIONS
Registered Landscape Architect in Oregon (282) and Texas (1445)
AWARDS
• La Center Waste Water Treatment Plant, ACEC
Oregon Engineering Excellence Award and Water and
Stormwater Honor Award, Washington, 2011
• Portland State University, Shattuck Hall Renovation, AIA Honor Award, Built Category and Sustainability Award,
2009
• Organized Stormfest 2006 Conference –North Carolina
State University, Raleigh, NC a three day symposium
featuring lectures and workshops highlighting innovative and sustainable stormwater design
C. Key Personnel & Qualifications
54 Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City
The Prime Consultant is GreenWorks, PC. Mike Abbaté
was a co-founder of this professional services firm in
1996 but left in 2008 to enter the public sector. Although Mike Abbaté has no remaining ownership stake in
GreenWorks, the two firms have collaborated on many
projects in the past and currently, including a new
Vietnam War Memorial on the Oregon State Capitol
grounds. We have a seamless working relationship
which makes coordination straightforward.

For this Beachfront Park project, Paul Agrimis will be
the Principal in Charge and Mike Abbaté of Abbaté
Designs LLC will be the Overall Project Lead. Several
subconsultants support the team as shown below.

D. Organization of Consulting Firm
GreenWorks, PC is a C Corporation incorporated in the state of Oregon. The firm is located in Portland, Oregon.

Abbaté Designs LLC is an S Corporation, incorporated in the State of Oregon. It is solely owned by Mike Abbaté and is a Veteran-owned business. It is also an Emerging Small Business in the State of Oregon.

The GreenWorks Team
GreenWorks
Landscape Architecture/Trail Design/MP Conflict Resolution/ADA Playground/QA/QC Stover Engineering
Survey Work/Civil Engineering

SUBCONSULTANT TEAM
Sea Reach
Tolowa Cultural Interpretation/Paths of Culture

CITY OF CRESCENT CITY

PRIME FIRM
Velosolutions
Bike Park/Pump Track
KPFF Consulting Engineers
Structural Engineering
Camas LLC
Permitting
Abbaté Designs

PROJECT LEAD
PAE
Electrial Engineering, Lighting
Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City 55
For this Project, the overall project lead responsibility for the project will be Mike Abbaté of Abbaté Designs.

Mike Abbaté will be the Client’s primary point of contact and Overall Project Lead. Paul Agrimis, Principal of
GreenWorks will be the back-up contact. We will also
have overall responsibility for QA/QC for the project.

GreenWorks PC will provide Quality Assurance/
Quality Control for their work and that of other
subconsultants. This is very similar to the way the team for the Vietnam War Memorial is currently structured
and is working well. GreenWorks will also oversee
production coordination of drawings and documents.
+
PC/C Corp Structure LLC/S Corp
19 Firm Size 1
9 Landscape Architects
4 Landscape Designers
4 Administrative Staff
Number
and Type of
Professional
Staff
1 Landscape Architect
34 Years in
Business 5
Portland Where work
is performed Portland
D. Organization of Consulting Firm

WORKING RELATIONSHIP

BETWEEN OUR TWO FIRMS
& QUALITY CONTROL

RESPONSIBILITY
56 Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City
Gateway Green
Portland,OR | Contract: $250K
Gateway Green is a 25-acre parcel of land owned by Portland Parks & Recreation. The project began as a grassroots effort by local landowners and open-space advocates to catalyze economic growth and recreational opportunities in outer East Portland.

Hemmed between major Interstate I-205 and I-84, the site is a remnant, barren landscape viewed as unusable due to limited access, and poor user experience being adjacent to the highways. GreenWorks collaborated with local stakeholders to transform the brownfield, and create a program and vision that drastically improves environmental conditions and provides habitat restoration.

Founded in 1987, GreenWorks provides a broad range of services for clients in the Pacific Northwest and beyond. A regional leader in sustainable design, GreenWorks is dedicated to providing innovative solutions for clients by linking natural resources, urban environments, and people.

Fanno Creek Greenway
Tigard, OR | Design: $421K
Fanno Creek Trail is a regional trail that extends from Tualatin to Portland, passing through Tigard, Beaverton and unincorporated Washington County. The vision dates back to 1975: a 15-mile walking and biking trail from the Willamette River in Southwest Portland to Fanno Creek’s confluence with the Tualatin River. GreenWorks has been working with the City of Tigard and stakeholders on multiple s of the Fanno Creek Trail project since 2017.

GreenWorks has provided design and permitting work for four segments of the trail, worked on restoration and realignment of Fanno Creek, and performed trail alignment and amenities studies for the City of Tigard.

Independence Landing Riverfront Park,
Independence, OR | Design: $259K
Greenworks is honored to be working with the City of Independence to implement the vision set forth in the Open Space Master Plan completed in 2015. The current work on Independence Landing improves a key piece of public waterfront located immediately south of Riverview Park, the flagship of the Independence park system.

Designed in tandem with the large waterfront re-development on the old Valley Concrete Site, Independence Landing is one piece in a larger orchestrated effort to revitalize downtown Independence and support commercial growth.

E. Related Work Experience & Qualifications
Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City 57
E. Related Work Experience & Qualifications
Oregon Capitol Vietnam War Memorial
Salem, OR | Valuation: $4M
This will be the official Vietnam War Memorial on the State Capitol Grounds in Salem, OR, just south of the WWII Memorial. The Memorial remembers the war and those who served our country in a tumultuous time.

The design recognizes the fractured public sentiment about the war and the way returning Veterans were treated. Incorporating two dramatic sculptures, the Memorial captures the fragmented reception returning Vietnam Veterans faced, while embracing the love of nature of all Oregonians.

Mriya Square Inclusive Park, Plaza and Play Areas
Slovyansk, Ukraine | Valuation: $12M
Designed to be universally accessible for kids and adults with disabilities, Mriya Square Park was designed in collaboration with the citizens and City Council of Slovyansk, Ukraine.

The new park is about 1 hectare (2.5 acres) in size and includes play areas for all ages, including a nature play area, a picnic shelter and adjoining civic plaza, interactive play fountain, and a calm area for park goers needing a quiet and contemplative space.

Paradise Visitor Center
Mount Rainier National Park, WA | Valuation: $24M
As Principal-In-Charge for GreenWorks, Mike Abbaté led the Cultural Landscape Analysis and Landscape Architectural design services components for a new Visitor Center at Paradise, a National Historic Landmark.

This included extensive analysis of historical development, clear wayfinding for visitors, and complex restoration plantings in this fragile alpine meadow. The design team was led by FFA Architects, of Portland.

Abbaté Designs, through its principal Mike Abbaté, has been involved in the Planning, Design and Construction of countless park projects. These include projects in National Parks, National Forests, State Parks, County and Regional parks, and Municipal Parks. In addition, as Director of Portland Parks & Recreation, Mike Abbaté oversaw the development of about $50 million of new parks in the city.
58 Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City
Staffing and Schedule
Mike Abbaté of Abbaté Designs will be our Project Manager and Overall Project Lead for the Beachfront Park Master Plan Phase 1. Paul Agrimis of GreenWorks will serve as his alternate/backup. Following is a summary table of our team staffing and a detailed schedule:

Key Team
Member
Project Role(s) Education &
Experience
Registration Key Skills & Experience
Mike Abbaté PLA,
FASLA - Abbaté
Designs
Overall Project
Lead/
Park Entry/
Amphitheater
BLA – Cal
Poly Pomona
University
35 years
PLA – OR, WA,
AK
• National public space design leader • 25 years as consultant leading design projects • 7 years as Director Portland Parks &
Recreation
Paul Agrimis, RLA,
PE - GreenWorks
Assist. Proj.

Manager/
Trail & Exercise
Loop/Resilient
Design
MLA - Univ.

Washington
BSE, Univ. of
Connecticut
35 years
PLA – OR, WA,
AK
PE – OR, WA,
AK
• 25 years as consultant leading multiobjective design projects • Active trail user as well as designer
• Past Chair Portland Parks & Recreation
Board
Ward Stover, PE – Stover
Engineering
Survey/
Civil Engineering/
Construction
Management
BSE -
California
State Univ. at
Chico
35 years
PE – CA, OR • 30+ years leading public works projects in Crescent City & Del Norte County • Strong relationship with Tolowa Dee-ni Nation
Megan Bradley – VeloSolutionsBike Park MLA – UC
Berkeley
5 years
• Skilled action sports designer • Champion Mountain Bicyclist Susan Jurasz –
Sea Reach
Tolowa Cultural
Interpretive Area/
Paths of Culture/
Tolowa Cultural Enh.

BFA & BS –
Lewis and
Clark College
34 years
• 35 years and thousands of projects
• 30 years working with Tribes on
interpretive exhibits
• Consummate visitor experience designer
Ben Johnson, PLA
- GreenWorks
MP Conflict
Resolution/New
ADA Playground
BLA – Univ. of
Florida
21 years
PLA – CA, OR • Excellent parks designer
• Strong collaborator
• Adept public meeting facilitator
Stuart Finney, PE
- KPFF
Structural
Engineering
MEng & BEng –
Oxford Univ.
21+ years
PE – CA, OR,
WA
• Vast structural experience
• 30+ parks throughout CA, OR, WA
Matt Robart –
Camas, LLC
Permitting MS, Ecology -
UC Davis
BS -Oregon
State Univ.
19+ years
• Outstanding CEQA experience
• Strong experience on north-central
California coast
Ron Tendick, PLAGreenWorksQA/QC BLA -
Texas Tech
University
33+ years
PLA – OR, TX • Deep experience in Construction
Document development and Quality
Management
• Hundreds of park projects in CA, OR, CO
and TX
Robert Mills, PE
PAE
Electrical
Engineering &
Lighting
BSE -
University
of Texas San
Antonio
PE – CA, OR • Excellent Reputation for innovation and
reliability
• Good collaborator and communicator
F. Staffing & Schedule
Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City 59
F. Staffing & Schedule
Crescent City Beachfront Park Schedule
60 Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City

1. General Development Plan
We will set the theme, style, and signage of the Park by beginning our work with a thoughtful consideration of the arc of the region from the Tolowa People through today. With the long and complicated history and the changing economy of Del Norte County in mind, we will focus on the current and future visitor experience that is desired.

Beachfront Park sits at an incredibly unique, beautiful, and historic location where the land meets the sea. Few cities have their major parks right at the ocean shore, with a beautiful lighthouse, shoreline, wildlife, and incredible views; nor do they have such a visceral connection to a Sister City as Crescent City does. There are many potential stories to tell, and we will help you to sort out which stories are told and how they are told.

To ensure that we get valued input from Tolowa and other tribal representatives on the Cultural Committee, other interviews, and work sessions, we recommend creating an allowance of up to $10,000 for their participation and consultation. We recommend this engagement based on our experience that demonstrating that tribal input is valued goes a long way to building good will and meaningful participation. We have included this as an allowance for the entire duration of the project in the fee breakdown which we have provided.

During this phase we would like to explore opportunities for the site that may not have been fully realized on in the Beachfront Master Plan. Before we go too far into implementation of the Design Elements included in the Master Plan, we believe it would be helpful to investigate issues such as connctivity of the park to adjacent properties, environmental resiliency, and design strategies to make Crescent City’s Beachfront Park a “don’t miss” attraction on the North Pacific Coast.

1.1 Perform Background Research
The GreenWorks/Abbaté Designs team will review the previous Master Plan and background documents, natural and cultural history, and current City and County plans that could affect the site. We anticipate accessing available City surveys, GIS, and other resources in digital formats to produce an initial set of base maps of surface features and utilities.

1.2 Conduct Site Visit, Site Analysis & Kickoff Meeting We will meet with the city to explore the site and adjacent areas together, to review project scope and schedule and clarify communication protocols. Attending will be representatives from Abbaté Designs, GreenWorks, Sea Reach and Stover Engineering. After our meetings and site visit with City staff, this will allow us extended time as a team to conduct site analysis and investigation. This will be Site Visit #1

1.3 Conduct Tribal Cultural Committee Meeting
Concurrent with Task 1.2,The GreenWorks/Abbaté Designs team will facilitate a meeting with the City’s established Tribal Cultural Committee. We will prepare a draft agenda, ask for Tribal input on the draft agenda, facilitate the meeting in Crescent City, and prepare notes.

It may also be helpful to include a site walkabout for all participants to better understand the site and each other at this first meeting.

1.4 Interview Key Staff at Pool, Cultural/Visitor Center, etc.

In conjunction with 1.2 and 1.3 above, we will conduct up to 15 in-person interviews with key staff at the Pool, Cultural/Visitor Center, local businesses, and potentially key community members to learn their perspectives on key design matters, themes, stories, and the future of Beachfront Park. We will prepare notes and anonymously attribute comments.

1.5 Conduct Community Listening Post Meeting
The GreenWorks/Abbaté Designs team will prepare for and conduct a Community Listening Post Meeting at the Cultural Center. We will prepare materials for several stations sharing Basic Site Information, Site Analysis, Emerging Themes and Stories and ask people to comment.

We will consider how to make Beachfront Park a driver of economic development and will look at the site through the eyes of both residents (up to 15 intercept surveys) and visitors (up to 15 intercept surveys) to understand what each of these groups would desire, and what could make them visit more often. This will also be presented as a virtual listening post. We will prepare summary notes. This will be Site Visit #2.

1.6 Develop Visitor Experiential Objectives
Based on what we have heard from meetings, interviews, and the Listening Post, we will look at the site through the eyes of both residents and visitors to understand what each of these groups would desire, and what could make them visit more often. We will capture these recommendations in the Park Development Theme Memo described in Task 1.9 below.

1.7 Draft General Development Plan Outline
Based on our work from Tasks 1.1-1.3 we will prepare an outline of where the refinement of the Master Plan appears to need to go to define the sense of place. This will include a Site Analysis figure identifying opportunities such as views, connections to downtown and other nearby properties, existing structures. The Site Analysis will also identify constraints such as areas prone to flooding, particularly windy portions of the site, site utilities or easements and other site factors and illustrate them based on direct observations and based on the digital materials provided by the City in Task 1.1

1.8 Conduct Review Meeting with Project Team
The GreenWorks/Abbaté Designs team will conduct a videoconference with the City to review of the Draft Development Plan outline. We will prepare meeting notes identifying key findings.

1.9 Park Development Theme Memo
The GreenWorks/Abbaté Designs team will prepare a brief memo describing key development issues and tie them together to begin building a cohesive story for Beachfront Park Master Plan Phase 1. Sea Reach will include an Interpretive Framework for the site which will help further Interpretive, Site Planning and Site Design efforts in all phases of Beachfront Park Development. This memo will have several sections:
• Interpretive Framework, including Story themes, why they are important, and how they can work together • How the storyline(s) can be supported with signage, art, the built environment, and other media • Stormwater management strategy for water quality, quantity and integration into park design
• Identify key details to help communicate themes and stories • Visitor Experiential Objectives

1.10 Prepare General Development Plan
The GreenWorks/Abbaté Designs team will prepare the Draft General Development Plan. This plan will also include a Continuation of Operations component, with a goal of disrupting as few current functions and G. Scope of Work
Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City 61
community events as possible. This will also include an overall State and Local permitting overview and timeline for both the Paths of Culture and Phase 1 elements.

1.11 Review Meeting with Client
The GreenWorks/Abbaté Designs team will conduct a videoconference with the City to review the Draft Development Plan. We will prepare meeting notes identifying key findings.

1.12 Finalize General Development Plan
The GreenWorks/Abbaté Designs team will incorporate City comments and submit the final General Development Plan. Development Deliverables General Development Plan:

1. General Development Plan

2. Interpretive Framework

3. Site Analysis

4. Park Development Theme Memo

5. Meeting Notes

2. General Master Plan Conflict Resolution
We will ensure continued function of the existing park areas, facilities, disc golf, and adjacent facilities that could be impacted by Phase 1 development by developing the Continued Functional Plan. The intention will be to minimize the need for reworking of utilities in future phases.

2.1 Conduct Site Topographic Survey
Prior work in Task 1 will inform what additional areas and features might need to be included in the survey. Stover Engineering will perform this comprehensive site topographic survey anticipated to span from tidewater to across Front Street, and from Elk Creek edge of water to across A Street.

2.2 Develop Continued Functions and Order of Operations Plan for Phase 1 The GreenWorks/Abbaté Designs team will develop this plan for Phase 1 operations and future phases to minimize spatial and timing conflicts.

This will also include an assessment of current and future utilities to ensure that future needs of the final build-out of Beachfront Park have been considered and accounted for. We will work with the City to first eliminate or reduce conflicts, and then propose potential mitigation for the conflicts that can’t be eliminated or minimized. This plan will be presented as a brief memo with illustrative figures.

2.3 Conduct Tribal Cultural Committee Meeting 2
The GreenWorks/Abbaté Designs team will prepare for and conduct a second Tribal Cultural Committee Meeting. The focus of this meeting will be to review the Draft Interpretive Plan and the Continued Functional Plan for Phase 1 and to solicit input. We will work with the City prepare a draft agenda, ask for Tribal input on the draft agenda, facilitate the meeting in Crescent City, and prepare notes. This will be Site Visit #3.

2.4 Conduct Review Meeting with Project Team
The GreenWorks/Abbaté Designs team will meet with the city in conjunction with the site visit in 2.3 to discuss the Continued Functions and Order of Operations Plan. We will prepare meeting notes identifying key findings.

General Masterplan Conflict Resolution Deliverables

1. Topographic Site Survey

2. Continued Functions in Order of Operations Plan

3. Meeting Notes

3. Design Elements – Phase 1
Several key park elements are funded through Prop 68, Per Capita, and Statewide Parks Program grants. These include the Park Entry at Stamps Way, the Bike Park – Pump Track, Tolowa Cultural Interpretive Area with Indigenous Plantings, One Mile Class 1 Trail/Exercise Loop, New ADA Playground, and Paths of Culture. We will develop these facilities consistent with the themes and style clarified through the General Development Plan and the General Master Plan Conflict Resolution tasks.

We believe it would be preferable to complete the Interpretive Framework, General Development Plan, and begin CEQA permitting before beginning work on the Paths of Culture. This would keep the same construction schedule and provide the benefit of CEQA compliance for the Paths of Culture. We have shown this in the Schedule, with Paths of Culture beginning in Task 3.7. However, if terms of the Per Capita Grant do not allow this sequencing, we can schedule this work to begin concurrently with task 3.1 below.

A second recommendation for your consideration is to have a conversation about how best to achieve the overall Interpretive objectives for the entire park and how the Paths of Culture can contribute to achieving those. Working strictly with the $30,000 design fee and $148,000 construction budget set aside for the Paths of Culture is likely to only allow a very simple interpretive story to be told through interpretive and site design elements. In any case, we are happy to work with you to accomplish as much as possible within the schedule and budget defined in the RFQ.

3.1 Develop Beachfront Park Phase 1 - 30% Plans, Specifications, and Cost Estimate
The GreenWorks/Abbaté Designs team will prepare the schematic plans for City review. We will concurrently prepare a specification outline, and the initial cost estimate. The drawings will be developed in AutoCAD 2020.

We estimate approximately x drawings in the submittal. The specification outline will be a Word document. The cost estimate will be an Excel spreadsheet. We have built into our schedule a two-week review by City staff.

3.2 Prepare Paths of Culture Interpretive and Preliminary Design Based on the Interpretive Framework and General Development Plan, the GreenWorks/Abbaté Designs team will work closely together with Sea Reach to develop the initial concepts, storylines, and site design for the Paths of Culture element. To achieve the schedule outlined in the RFQ, we believe that this element may need to be designed in ways that will allow exemption from CEQA and Coastal Development Permit requirements.

This integrated Interpretive Site Plan will serve as the basis for the Paths of Culture Site Plan PSE described in task 3.9.

3.3 Conduct Tribal Cultural Committee Meeting 3
The GreenWorks/Abbaté Designs team will prepare for and conduct a third Tribal Cultural Committee Meeting. The focus of this meeting will be to review the Paths of Culture Interpretive and Preliminary Design and the Phase 1 30% plans and to solicit input. We will work with the City to prepare a draft agenda, ask for Tribal input on the draft agenda, facilitate the meeting in Crescent City, and prepare notes. This will be Site Visit #4.

3.4 Conduct Public Meeting
In conjunction with the Cultural Committee Meeting in 3.2, The GreenWorks/Abbaté Designs team will prepare for and conduct a Public Meeting at the Cultural Center. We will prepare materials to present the schematic plans and ask people to comment. This will also be presented as a virtual listening post. We will prepare summary notes.

G. Scope of Work
62 Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City

3.5 Conduct Review Meeting with Project Team
In conjunction with 3.2 and 3.3 above, The GreenWorks/Abbaté Designs team will meet with the City to review input from the Tribal Cultural Committee and the Public Meeting as well as City comments on the schematic plans. We will also discuss upcoming presentations to the Planning Commission and City Council. We will prepare meeting notes and identify key conclusions.

3.6 Present to a Joint Planning Commission and City Council Meeting The GreenWorks/Abbaté Designs team will make Site Visit #5 to present the schematic plans to the Planning Commission and the City Council for their review and comment. We will prepare summary notes.

3.7 Begin CEQA Document and California Coastal Commission Permit Application Materials
Based on the 30% PSE documents developed for Phase 1 in Task 3.1, Camas will begin preparing the CEQA document and Coastal Development permit materials needed for Phase 1. Based on the activities described in the City’s RFQ, it is anticipated that the Project will require preparation of an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND), which will be determined through early consultation with the City and state resource agencies. More details on the expected permitting process are included in our Permitting Qualifications section.

3.8 Prepare Paths of Culture PSE
Assuming the Paths of Culture is determined exempt from CEQA, the GreenWorks/Abbaté Designs team will prepare the Interpretive Design Development and Site construction documents for the Paths of Culture. The drawings will be developed in AutoCAD 2020. We estimate approximately 8 sheets of drawings in the submittal. The specifications will be a Word document. The cost estimate will be an Excel spreadsheet.

For increased efficiency, Sea Reach also can fabricate and install all interpretive elements, so the Interpretive Design Development fee could come from the $147,952 allocated for construction. This would result in significantly lower costs than if the Interpretive package was to go out to bid. We have built into our schedule a two-week review by City staff.

3.9 Provide Bidding and Construction Services for Paths of Culture The GreenWorks/Abbaté Designs team will assist the City in bidding the Paths of Culture portion of the project and then in providing construction services. These will include demolition, grading, paving, irrigation, planting, and construction details for the construction of the Paths of Culture element. Four construction meetings are anticipated. Final Closeout will be completed by June 30, 2024.

3.10 Develop Beachfront Park Phase 1 - 60% Plans, Specifications, and Cost Estimate
The GreenWorks/Abbaté Designs team will prepare the design development documents for rest of the Park. The drawings will be developed in AutoCAD 2020. We estimate approximately z drawings in the submittal. The specifications will be a Word document. The cost estimate will be an Excel spreadsheet. We have built into our schedule a two-week review by City staff.

3.11 Conduct Tribal Cultural Committee Meeting 5
Construction of the Paths of Culture may be subject to completion of the CEQA process since it is part of the aggregate project. The Camas and GreenWorks/Abbaté Designs team will work with the City to determine a path forward.

The GreenWorks/Abbaté Designs team will prepare for and conduct a fifth Tribal Cultural Committee Meeting. The focus of this meeting will be to review the 60% plans and to solicit input. We will work with the City to prepare a draft agenda, ask for Tribal input on the draft agenda, facilitate the meeting in Crescent City, and prepare notes. This will be site Visit #6.

3.12 Conduct Community Listening Post Meeting
In conjunction with 3.11 above, the GreenWorks/Abbaté Designs team will prepare for and conduct a Community Listening Post Meeting at the Cultural Center. We will prepare materials for several stations sharing the 60% plans and ask people to comment. This will also be presented as a virtual listening post. We will prepare summary notes.

3.13 Conduct Review Meeting with Project Team
In conjunction with 3.12 above, the GreenWorks/Abbaté Designs team will meet with the City to review input from the Tribal Cultural Committee and the second Listening Post Meeting as well as City comments on the 60% plans. We will prepare meeting notes identifying key conclusions.

3.14 Develop Beachfront Park Phase 1 - 90% Plans, Specifications, and Cost Estimate
The GreenWorks/Abbaté Designs team will prepare the construction documents for the Park. The drawings will be developed in AutoCAD 2020.

The specifications will be in MS Word document. The cost estimate will be an Excel spreadsheet. We have built into our schedule a two-week review by City staff.

3.15 Conduct Review Meeting with Project Team
The GreenWorks/Abbaté Designs team will conduct a videoconference with the City to review the 90% plans and City comments. We will prepare meeting notes identifying key conclusions.

3.16 Prepare Local Permits & Finalize CEQA Document
Camas and the GreenWorks/Abbaté Designs team will update and finalize the CEQA document with the 90% documents, review with the City, and will submit materials to the State Clearinghouse and apply for local permits.

3.17 Conduct Review Meeting with Project Team
The GreenWorks/Abbaté Designs team will conduct a videoconference with the City to review the permit feedback on the submittals. We will prepare meeting notes identifying key conclusions.

3.18 Develop Beachfront Park Phase 1 - 100% Plans, Specifications, and Cost Estimate
The GreenWorks/Abbaté Designs team will prepare the final construction documents for the Park. The drawings will be developed in AutoCAD 2020.

The specifications will be a Word document. The cost estimate will be an Excel spreadsheet. We have built into our schedule a two-week review by City staff.

3.19 Provide Bidding and Construction Services for Phase 1 The GreenWorks/Abbaté Designs team will assist the City in bidding the Phase 1 of the project and then in providing construction services. We will be available to assist with Construction Management of the Phase 1 project, using the expertise and local availability of Stover Engineering.

Final Closeout will be completed by June 30, 2025.

Design Elements Phase 1 Deliverables:

1. Preliminary Design Estimates

2. Paths of Culture Interpretive & Preliminary Design

3. Paths of Culture Plans, Specifications and Estimate (PS&E)

4. Phase 1 - 30% PS&E

5. CEQA, CCC and LocalPermit applications

6. Phase 1 - 60% PS&E

7. Phase 2 - 90& PS&E

8. Final CEQA, CCC and Local Permit Submittals

9. Phase 1 - 100% Bid Documents
Final Closeout will be completed by June 30,
2025.

G. Scope of Work
Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City 63
64 Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City
Abbaté Designs

1. Colleen Chiochetti ; Mriya Square Park, Plaza & Play Area; Slovyansk, Ukraine; Chemonics International/
USAID; +370-6611-8336

2. Eric Schmidt; Gresham Center for the Arts Park &
Plaza; City of Gresham, OR; 503-618-2877

3. Steve Bates; Oregon Capitol Vietnam War Memorial;
President, Vietnam War Memorial Fund; 503-663-6271
GreenWorks

1. Rob Romanek; Geer Park Master Plan Update; Parks
Planner, City of Salem; Public Works Department; 503-
588-6211

2. Patricia Farrell, retired; Battle Creek Wetland Park; Parks and Natural Resources Planning Manager, City of
Salem; (503) 588-6211

3. Ross Swanson; Gateway Green; Project Manager,
Portland Parks & Recreation; 503-823-3577
Camas LLC

1. Laura Hazlett; Klamath River Renewal Corporation,
Chief Operating Officer/Chief Financial Officer;
Klamath Dam Removal – Permitting and CEQA Support;
510-325-3179

2. Angela Durant; City of Medford, OR; Planning
Department Principal Planner; NEPA Compliance;
541.774.2390

3. Andrew Pinger; EDP Renewables North America, LLC;
Senior Manager, Environmental Affairs, Rising Tree
Wind Energy Facilities I/II and III; 281-636-8426
KPFF

1. Marlo Medellin; Springwater Trail Bridge; Portland
Parks and Recreation; 971 940 5739

2. Allan Schmidt; St. Johns Prairie Trail; Metro; 503 473 7341

3. Cameron Glasgow; On Call Services - Bridge
and Structural Engineering; Portland Bureau of
Transportation; 503 823 9726
PAE

1. Paul Agrimis; GreenWorks; | Chehalem Parks
& Recreation District, Chehalem Heritage Trails
Campground; 222-5612

2. Tanner Perrine; Lease Crutcher Lewis; Eugene Town
Square; Farmers Market; 503-969-0202

3. Nathan Kappen; Walker | Macy; Eugene Riverfront
Park; 509-290-4183
Sea Reach Ltd

1. Carol Ryan, retired; Contracting Officer Representative, USDA Forest Service; Region 4; 801-866-4992

2. Larisa Bowen; Project Coordinator, The Nature
Conservancy; 801-574-0599

3. Greg Ausland; Ausland Group, formerly OBEC
Consulting Engineers; 541-914-1725
Stover Engineering

1. Tim Hoone; Dat Naa-svt Village Site Improvements;
Planning Director, Tolowa Dee-ni Nation; 707-487-9255

2. Dennis Broward; California Highway Patrol
Replacement Facility; Contractor, Clark/Sullivan and
Broward; Builders Joint Venture; Crescent City, CA 530- 681-1795

3. Ernest Perry, retired; Harbor Planner, City of Crescent City; 707-954-1423
Velosolutions

1. Bryce Howell; Menifee CA: Evans Bike Park; 951-723-
3752

2. Sean Coleman Port Angeles WA: Design and Build 360-
460-1435

3. Ryan Castillo Temecula, CA: Pump Track Design and
Build 951-693-3964
Project Team References
H. References
Beachfront Park Master Plan / City of Crescent City 65
110 SE MAIN ST. SUITE 100, PORTLAND, OR 97214 | 503.222.5612

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
TO: MAYOR GREENOUGH AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ERIC WIER, CITY MANAGER
BY: JON OLSON, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
DATE: JUNE 20, 2022
SUBJECT: 2022 MEASURE S COLLECTOR STREET MAINTENANCE AND

PRESERVATION PROJECT
______________________________________________________________________

RECOMMENDATION
• Hear staff report
• Technical questions from the Council
• Receive public comment
• Further Council discussion
• Approve the plans and specifications and award the 2022 Measure S Collector Street Maintenance and Preservation Project to Hemmingsen Contracting Co., Inc., authorize the City Manager to sign an agreement with said contractor, and authorize the City Manager to approve and sign change orders in an aggregate amount not to exceed available contingency funds.

BACKGROUND
The Measure S Collector Street Maintenance and Preservation Project (the “Project”) will extend the useful life of Harding Avenue, 9
th Street, and H Street in Crescent City. The
work will involve milling existing asphalt and inlaying new, crack sealing, pothole repairs, accessibility improvements, and various other maintenance items.

On November 3, 2020, the voters of the City approved Measure S, authorizing the imposition of a local 1% transactions and use tax (sales) within the City. The Ordinance was formally adopted by the City Council on December 7, 2020. The collection of the tax began on April 1, 2021.

Through a series of public meetings, the Measure S committee recommended, and the City Council adopted a budget detailing how the Measure S funds were to be spent. The proposed project will carry out the recommendations based on the adopted budget. As discussed in the Measure S – Streets workshop held on March 9, 2021, this project is based on the “best first” approach.

MEASURE S COLLECTOR STREET PROJECT
JUNE 20, 2022
2 There are many streets within the City in need of maintenance and repair. Accepted best practice where budgets are limited is to invest in preserving the streets that are still in good condition, to prevent them falling into complete disrepair. Evaluating the total longterm cost of such streets shows that periodic maintenance and preservation while streets are still “good” is much less costly than reconstructing the street after it has degraded to poor condition.

The City does have several streets in poor condition and is actively pursuing strategies to fund the reconstruction of those areas. For those streets, Measure S funding alone cannot fund the project. For example, the City is currently working on a project to reconstruct Front Street between G Street and I Street. That project is estimated at $2.2 million and is funded by a combination of Measure S, ARPA, City General Fund, and Local Transportation Commission. Measure S funding would not have been sufficient for that project or others like it.

On May 2, 2022, the City Council authorized staff to advertise and receive bids for the Project. The full contract is attached to this staff report.

Bids were advertised on May 23, 2022. Bids were received and opened on June 13, 2022 at 2:00 pm.

ITEM ANALYSIS
There is one alternative included in this bid. The project award must be made to the lowest, responsible bidder based on the grand total including alternative 1.

A total of three responsive bids were received. The following table shows the bids received:

Bidder Base Bid Amount
Hemmingsen Contracting Co. Inc. $ 417,222
Tidewater Contractors, Inc. $ 590,145
GR Sundberg $ 669,660
Hemmingsen Contractors is the lowest, responsible bidder. Staff is recommending Council authorize the City Manager to sign an agreement with Hemmingsen.

If approved the estimated construction schedule is as follows:

Council Authorizes Award of Contract June 20, 2022
Notice of award June 21, 2022
Notice to Proceed August, 2022
Construction Complete October, 2022

MEASURE S COLLECTOR STREET PROJECT
JUNE 20, 2022
3 This project is scheduled to be completed within 3 months after award of the contract.

Staff foresees no issues in completing the project within the allotted timeframe.

The scope of work includes the following street improvements:
• Harding Avenue from Truman Ct. to Northcrest Dr. will include asphalt inlay, crack sealing and replacement striping.
• Ninth Street from Gainard to A Street will include some asphalt inlay, crack sealing, replacement striping, and sidewalk replacement. • Ninth Street from A to H Street will include some asphalt inlay, crack sealing, replacement striping and some sidewalk replacement.
• H street from 7
th to Front Street will include asphalt inlay and repaving, crack sealing, replacement striping and some sidewalk replacement.

FISCAL ANALYSIS
This project is funded with Measure S funds. As recommended by the Measure S Oversight Committee and adopted by the City Council, a budget of $250,000 was allocated in FY 21-22 to fund half of this project. The Oversight Committee further recommended the second $250,000 in the FY 22-23 budget, which the Council is scheduled to hear in another item on tonight’s agenda. The total funding for the project, all of which comes from Measure S funds, is $500,000.The contract amount is $417,222 which is below the Measure S budget. The contingency for this project is $82,778 which is 17% of the total project. In the event of change orders exceeding the available funds staff would seek additional funding sources.

STRATEGIC PLAN ASSESSMENT
This project was listed as a priority project in meeting the goals and objectives of Goal 1 “Support quality services and community safety to enhance the lives of our citizens and visitors”.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Bid Result Tabulation June 20, 2022

2. Contract with Hemmingsen Contracting Co., Inc.

CRESCENT CITY SMALL PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT P a g e | 1

CITY OF CRESCENT CITY

AGREEMENT FOR

SMALL PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT
This Agreement is entered into by and between the City of Crescent City, a California municipal corporation, and Contractor identified below, for the construction of a small public works project.

1. IDENTIFICATION OF PARTIES.
a. City: City of Crescent City
Attn: City Manager
377 J Street
Crescent City, CA 95531
707-464-7483
b. Contractor: Hemmingsen Contracting Co. Inc. / Lic. No. 957852 Attn: David Yeager
1841 Northcrest Drive
Crescent City, CA 95531
(707) 464-5225

2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION. The “Project” to be completed under this Agreement is for Measure S Collector Street Maintenance & Preservation. City has provided plans and specifications for the Project to Contractor, which are attached hereto as “Exhibit A” and incorporated herein by this reference. All work is to be completed in a workmanlike manner according to standard industry practices. The Project includes the following work:
a. Harding Street from Truman Ct to Northcrest Dr.
b. 9th Street from Gainard to A street
c. 9th Street from A to H street
d. H Street from Front to 5th street
e. H Street from 5th to 7th street

3. COMPENSATION. The total compensation City will pay Contractor for construction and completion of the Project is Four Hundred and Seventeen Thousand and Two Hundred and Twenty-Two Dollars ($417,222.00) (“Contract Price”) as detailed on the cost sheet attached hereto as “Exhibit B” and incorporated herein by this reference.

4. PREVAILING WAGE. Contractor is required to pay prevailing wages on this Project as determined by the Department of Industrial Relations.

5. DIR REGISTRATION. If the Project is for construction work and exceeds $25,000 or is for maintenance work and exceeds $15,000, Contractor represents and warrants that Contractor is registered with the Department of Industrial Relations.

CRESCENT CITY SMALL PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT P a g e | 2

6. SCHEDULE. The Project is to be commenced upon a date mutually agreed upon between Hemmingsen Contracting Co, Inc. and the City Engineer. The work will begin with a pre-construction meeting between Contractor and the City’s Public Works Director / City Engineer.

7. PAYMENT TERMS. The Contractor will be paid in monthly progress payments with a 5% retention. Contractor is responsible to provide and pay for all costs associated with the prosecution of the Project, including, but not limited to: (i) labor, materials, equipment, tools, permits, and licenses necessary for the proper execution and completion of the work; (ii) required sales, consumer, and use taxes; and (iii) the cost of insurance premiums required by this Agreement.

8. CHANGES IN WORK. If City directs any modification or addition to the work covered by this Agreement, this Agreement will be adjusted accordingly. Modification or addition to the work will be effective when both City and Contractor have signed a Change Order. Contractor must promptly notify City of any unknown physical conditions that differ materially from those ordinarily encountered and recognized as inherent in work of the character provided in this Agreement. City as “extra work” agrees to pay for any expenses due to such conditions.

9. CONTRACTOR’S REPRESENTATIONS. Contractor represents that Contractor has familiarized itself with the work site, locality, and all local conditions and laws and regulations that in any manner may affect cost, progress, or performance of the work.

Contractor represents that it is duly licensed to perform the work as required by state and local laws and regulations.

10.DELAYS. Contractor agrees to start and diligently perform the work through to completion, but shall not be responsible for delay for any of the following reasons:
acts of neglect or omission of City, its elected and appointed officials, employees or agents, acts of God, inclement weather, strikes, lockouts, boycotts, or other labor unrest, extra work ordered by City, delays caused by inspection or changes ordered by authorized governmental bodies, or for other causes beyond the reasonable control of Contractor. Contractor must notify City of any anticipated delays.

11.PERSONNEL. Contractor will provide competent, suitable personnel to perform the work under this Agreement and at all times must maintain good discipline and order at the Project location.

12.SAFETY. Contractor is responsible for initiating, maintaining and supervising all safety precautions in connection with the work. Contractor must comply with all applicable laws and regulations relating to the safety of persons or property.

Interruptions to the flow of vehicular traffic must be kept to a minimum.

13.BOND REQUIREMENTS. Contractor is required to provide the following bonds for the Project (check all that apply):
☐ None. No bonds are required as part of this Agreement.

CRESCENT CITY SMALL PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT P a g e | 3
☒ Payment Bond in the amount of 100% of the Contract Price. (Required for Projects with a Contract Price of more than $25,000.)
☒Performance Bond in the amount of 100% of the Contract Price. (Discretionary.)

14.INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. Contractor must maintain insurance policies with the following coverages and minimum amounts for the duration of this Agreement:

Coverage Type Minimum Limits
a. Commercial General Liability (CGL)
ISO Form CG 00 01, including products completed
operations, covering bodily injury, personal injury,
and property damage.
$1 million per occurrence; $2
million aggregate
b. Automobile Liability
ISO Form CA 0001 covering Code 1 – any auto,
property damage and bodily injury
$1 million per accident
c. Workers’ Compensation Statutory Limits
d. Employer’s Liability - for bodily injury or disease $1 million per accident

15.INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. Contractor is operating as an independent contractor and not as an employee of City. Neither Contractor nor any of its employees are eligible to receive any of the rights or benefits otherwise available to City’s employees. Contractor is free from the direction and control of City over the means and manner of performing services under this Agreement, subject only to the right of City to specify the desired results. Contractor is solely responsible for payment of all taxes, fees, and salaries due its employees as required by law or other agreement.

16.ASBESTOS AND HAZARDOUS WASTE. If Contractor encounters asbestos or other hazardous materials, Contractor must immediately stop work and allow City to obtain a duly qualified asbestos and/or hazardous materials Contractor to perform the necessary work. If Contractor is qualified to remove asbestos or other hazardous materials, City may engage Contractor to do the work. Said work will be treated as extra work under this Agreement.

17.GENERAL PROVISIONS.
a. INDEMNIFICATION. Contractor agrees to indemnify and hold harmless City, its elected and appointed officials, employees and agents against any loss, liability, cost, expense, or damages of any kind whatsoever (including reasonably attorney’s fees) that arise out of or result from the performance of work under this Agreement but only to the extent caused in whole or in part by the acts or omissions, negligent or otherwise, of Contractor, its employees, agents or subcontractors.

CRESCENT CITY SMALL PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT P a g e | 4
b. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS. Contractor is required to comply with all state, county and local laws, ordinances and regulations in the performance of work under this Agreement.
c. ASSIGNMENT. Contractor may not assign any right or delegate any obligation hereunder without the written consent of City. Any purported assignment or delegation without such consent will be void and unenforceable and constitute a material breach of this Agreement.
d. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS. This Agreement is binding upon and insures to the benefit of the parties and their respective successors and permitted assigns.
e. GOVERNING LAW. This Agreement is to be construed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Contractor have caused this Agreement to be executed this ____ day of _____________, 20_____ at Crescent City, California.

CITY OF CRESCENT CITY: CONTRACTOR:

By: Eric Wier, City Manager By:

Its:

MEASURE S COLLECTOR STREET MAINTENANCE & PRESERVATION 13 June 2022 JN 2022-1043 00 10 00 – INVITATION TO BID 1 of 4

CITY OF CRESCENT CITY

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
________________________________________________________

NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS FOR

MEASURE S COLLECTOR STREET MAINTENANCE &

PRESERVATION

CRESCENT CITY, DEL NORTE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
_______________________________________________________ Bid Posting: May 23, 2022
Bids Open: June 13, 2022
Items included in the bid package:

Bidding Schedule
Plan Sheets for Harding, H, & 9th Streets
s
<p
i
CJ
1 f
/'NJ^LAV
MEASURE S COLLECTOR STREET MAINTENANCE & PRESERVATION 13 June 2022 JN 2022-1043 00 10 00 – INVITATION TO BID 2 of 4

INVITATION TO BID

CRESCENT CITY MEASURE S COLLECTOR STREET MAINTENANCE &

PRESERVATION
CONTRACT #2022-1043
Sealed bids for the construction of the Measure S Collector Street Maintenance & Preservation project will be received by the Owner, the City of Crescent City at the Crescent City Public Works Department office until 2:00 PM on 13 June 2022. The bids will be opened publicly and read aloud at 2:00 PM on the same day in the Public Works Office. Bids must be addressed to:

City of Crescent City
Public Works Department
377 J Street
Crescent City, CA 95501
Or submitted by email to [email protected] & [email protected] and labeled "Bids for the MEASURE S COLLECTOR STREET MAINTENANCE & PRESERVATION."
The work includes the furnishing of the labor, materials, and equipment for Mill & Inlay, General Paving, Crack Sealing, Curb & Gutter, Reinforced Driveways, Sidewalks & Ramps, Collars, and Striping as specified per the drawings attached. The project is located at Harding, 9th and H streets, Crescent City, CA.

The project manual may be inspected at the following locations:
https://www.crescentcity.org/bids
City of Crescent City
Public Works Department
377 J Street
Crescent City CA 95531
Humboldt Builders Exchange
624 C Street
Eureka, CA 95501
(707) 442-3708
Shasta Builders Exchange
2985 Innsbruck Drive
Redding, CA 96003
(530) 221-5556

MEASURE S COLLECTOR STREET MAINTENANCE & PRESERVATION 13 June 2022 JN 2022-1043 00 10 00 – INVITATION TO BID 3 of 4
Medford Builders Exchange
2330 Crater Lake Ave
Medford, OR 97504
(541) 773-5327
San Francisco Builders Exchange
850 S Van Ness Ave
San Francisco, CA 94110
(925) 324-2727
Placer County Contractors Association
10656 Industrial Ave #160
Roseville, CA 95678
(916) 771-7229
Dodge Data & Analytics
www.construction.com
(800) 393-6343
Construction Bidboard
11622 El Camino Real #100
San Diego, CA 92130
(619) 688-0588
Each bid must be accompanied by a bid guaranty bond, or a certified or cashier's check payable to the order of the Owner in an amount not less than ten percent (10%) of the amount of the bid as a guaranty that the bidder will execute the contract if it is awarded in conformity with the bid form. The successful bidder will be required to furnish performance and payment bonds, each in an amount not less than one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price.

At the successful Bidder's option, securities may be substituted for the required retention, in accordance with the provisions of Section 22300 of the State of California Public Contract Code.

The Owner reserves the right to reject any or all bids and to determine which bid is, in the Owner's judgment, the lowest responsive bid of a bidder or group of bidders. The Owner also reserves the right to waive any informalities in any bid and to delete items listed in the bid.

Bids received after the time established for receiving bids will not be considered.

Except as provided in paragraph 00 20 10-1.04, no bidder may withdraw his bid after the time established for receiving bids or before the award and execution of the contract, unless the award is delayed for a period exceeding ninety (90) calendar days.

Bidders are hereby notified that pursuant to Section 1773 et seq. of the Labor Code of the Statutes of the State of California, the Owner has obtained from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations the general prevailing rate of wages and employer payments for health and welfare, vacation, pension, and similar purposes for work to be done within Del Norte County, California. Regulations regarding the application of these wage rates are given in paragraph
00 20 00-1.04
WITHDRAWAL OF BIDS: Within five days after the opening of bids, a bidder may withdraw his bid, if he establishes to the Owner's satisfaction that a mistake was made in preparing the bid. A bidder who wants to withdraw must give written notice to the Owner, specifying, in detail, how the mistake occurred and how the mistake made the bid materially different than it was intended to be. Withdrawal is not permitted for mistakes resulting from errors in judgment or carelessness in inspecting the site of the work or in reading the project manual.
00 20 00-1.12.

No contractor or subcontractor may be listed on a bid proposal for a public works project unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code section 1725.5 [with limited exceptions from this requirement for bid purposes only under Labor Code section 1771.1(a)].

No contractor or subcontractor may be awarded a contract for public work on a public works project unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code section 1725.5.

This project is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations.
^
Bidders on this work must comply with all applicable governmental and local agency requirements.

Schedule:

Issue Invitation to Bid
Bids Due
Bid Opening
Contract before Council
May 23, 2022
June 13, 2022 before 2:00pm
June^13, 2022 @ 2:00pm
Ju/
fe 20, 2022
Date: 23 May 2022 B}c Jonathan Olson, City Engineer

END OF SECTION

MEASURE S COLLECTOR STREET MAINTENANCE & PRESERVATION
00 10 00 -INVITATION TO BID
13 June 2022
JN 2022-1043 4 of 4
2022-1043 MEASURE S COLLECTOR STREET

MAINTENANCE & PRESERVATION

SHEET INDEX

VICINITY MAP

CRESCENT CITY

LOS ANGELES
EUREKA

LOCATION MAP
NTS

1. COVER SHEET

2. LEGEND AND NOTES

3. HARDING PLANS STATION 7+50 TO 19+00

4. HARDING PLANS STATION 19+00 TO 22+50

5. H STREET PLANS

6. 9TH STREET PLANS STATION 00 TO 16+50

7. 9TH STREET PLANS STATION 16+50 TO 31+00

8. ADA DRIVEWAY DETAIL 1 AND 2

9. ADA CURB RAMP AND CURB DETAIL 3, 3A AND 4
HWY101
HARDING AVE.

H ST.
9TH ST.

FO Y
IT
C

CRES ENT CITY
I

CAL FOR N I A
C
1854

C I V I L
J

ONATHAN OLSON
3 7
7 J
S
tre
e
t
C
re
s
c
e
n
t
City, CA
9 5
5 3
1 (
7 0
7)
4 6
4 -
9 5
0 6
p
h
o
n
e
(
7 0
7)
4 6
5 -
4 4
0 5
fax
C
I
T
Y
o
f
C
R
E
S
C
EN
T
C
I
T
Y

CHECKED BY
DATE
SCALE
JOB NO

DESIGN BY DRAWN BY

PRELIMINARY
N
O. R
E
VISIO
N
D
A
T
E
SHEET
FO
R
RED
U

CED PLA
N
S
O
RIGIN
AL S
C

ALE IS IN IN
C
HES
0 1
APRIL 2022
NTS
1 2022-1043
2 0
2 2
-
1 0
4 3
M
E
A
S
U
R
E
S
C
R
E
S
C
E
N
T
CIT
Y, C
A
C
O
V
E
R
S
H
E
E
T
JDO

ABBREVIATIONS LEGEND
- MILL AND INLAY/ DIG OUT AND PATCH AS DIRECTED
- ADA RAMP
- ADA DRIVEWAY, LENGTH SHOWN
- CRACK SEAL
- CONCRETE COLLARS AT MANHOLE
- STORM DRAIN
- SIDEWALK

REPAIR NOTES & SPECIFICATIONS

1. MINIMUM DEPTH OF HMA MILL SHALL BE 0.15' MIN.

2. ALL LOOSE PAVING SHALL BE REMOVED FROM EDGES

3. FOLLOW CALTRANS STANDARDS FOR PATCHING

4.CONCRETE COLLAR SHALL BE 5 FEET IN DIAMETER & 6" THICK MIN.

5. BROKEN CONCRETE COLLARS REPLACED AS DESIGNATED

6. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN

7. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY RESIDENTS & BUSINESS OWNERS

IMPACTED BY WORK

8. CONCRETE SHALL BE SIX SACK MINIMUM

9. CONTRACTOR SHALL MARK OUT ALL WORK & VERIFY LOCATIONS OF WORK W/ CITY ENGINEER PRIOR TO PERFORMING ANY WORK.

10. SOME COMPONENTS SHOWN ARE DIAGRAMMATIC ONLY.

CITY STANDARDS FOR CRACK SEAL

1. SURFACES SHALL BE CLEAN & DRY

2. HOT AIR BLASTER/ HEAT LANCES SHALL BE USED TO CLEAN ALL CRACKS.

3. CRACK SIDES MUST BE SOUND.

4. ANY CRACKS FOUND WITH LOOSE PAVEMENT, DUST, DIRT OR DEBRIS

SHALL BE RECLEANED

5. MOIST CRACKS MUST BE BLASTED DRY.

6. CLEANING/ BLASTING SHALL BE PERFORMED WITHIN 5 MINUTES PRIOR TO SEALING TO MAINTAIN WARM PAVEMENT TEMPERATURES.

7. USE EXTREME CAUTION TO NOT BURN EXISTING PAVING

8. ENSURE PROPER TEMPERATURE RANGE FOR SEALANT. PROVIDE MANUFACTURES INSTRUCTIONS.

9. FILL CRACKS FROM BOTTOM UP TO ELIMINATE VOIDS

10. RE APPLY SEALANT TO LOW AREAS WHERE SEALANT HAS SETTLED OR INSUFFICIENT MATERIAL WAS USED.

11. REMOVE ALL LOOSE OR EXCESSIVE SEALANT

12. CRACK SEAL PAVEMENT EDGE AT GUTTER.

STREET STRIPING

1. ALL STRIPING REMOVED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE REPLACED IN KIND.

2. WHERE ACCESSIBLE RAMPS OCCUR, CROSSWALK STRIPING SHALL BE ADDED.

3. CENTER LINE AND FOG LINE SHALL BE RESTORED TO LIKE NEW CONDITION.
@ AT R RADIUS OR RIGHT Ø DIAMETER RC RELATIVE COMPACTION Δ DELTA SC SAWCUT & AMPERSAND (AND) SD STORM DRAIN ± PLUS OR MINUS, APPROXIMATE SDMH STORM DRAIN MANHOLE -OR- OFFICIAL RECORD (DEED, DCR) SF SQUARE FOOT

AB AGGREGATE BASE SPK WATER SPIGOT

AC ASPHALT CONCRETE SS SANITARY SEWER (GRAVITY)

APN ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER SSMH SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE

ARV AIR RELEASE VALVE TC TOP FACE OF CURB

BC BACK OF CURB TOB TOP OF BANK

BEG BEGIN TOS TOE OF SLOPE

BH BORE HOLE TRANS TRANSITION

BLDG BUILDING TYP TYPICAL

BM BENCH MARK UNO UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE

BMP BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES VG VALLEY GUTTER

BO BLOW-OFF WM WATER METER

BOLL BOLLARD WV WATER VALVE

BSW BACK OF SIDEWALK WW WALK WAY

CATV CABLE TELEVISION W/ WITH

CC CURB CUT

CCHD CRESCENT CITY HARBOR DISTRICT

CLR CLEAR

CO CLEAN OUT

CONCCONCRETE

CP CONTROL POINT

CY CUBIC YARD

DCR DEL NORTE COUNTY RECORDS

DEMODEMOLISH

DI DRAIN INLET

DIA DIAMETER
DOC# DOCUMENT NUMBER (DCR)

DW DRIVEWAY

EG EXISTING GROUND

ELEC ELECTRICAL

ELEV ELEVATION

EP EDGE OF PAVEMENT
<E> EXISTING

ENCL ENCLOSURE

FD FRENCH DRAIN

FF FINISH FLOOR

FG FINISH GRADE

FL FLOWLINE

FT FOOT

GB GRADE BREAK

GTE PHONE UTILITY

GTD GRADE TO DRAIN

HP HIGH POINT

HMA HOT MIX ASPHALT

HWY HIGHWAY

HYD FIRE HYDRANT

IMP IMPROVEMENT
IN: INVERT IN

JT JOINT TRENCH L LENGTH OR LEFT

LF LINEAR FEET

LP LIGHT POLE

MAX MAXIMUM

MH MANHOLE

MIN MINIMUM

MISC MISCELLANEOUS

MW MONITORING WELL

NGS NATIONAL GEODETIC SURVEY
No NUMBER
<N> NEW
OUT: INVERT OUT

PAV PAVEMENT

PC POINT OF CURVATURE

PCC POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE

PRC POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE

PS PRESSURE SEWER

PT POINT OF TANGENCY OR PERCOLATION TEST

PVC POLYVINYL CHLORIDE
XXXX
C
I
V
I
L

JONATHA
N
OLSON
377 J Street
Crescent City, CA 95531
(707) 464-9506 phone
(707) 465-4405 fax
CITY of CRESCENT CITY

CHECKED BY
DATE
SCALE
JOB NO
DESIGN BY DRAWN BY PRELIMINARY NO. REVISION DATE
SHEET

FOR REDUCED PLANS

ORIGINAL SCALE IS IN INCHES
0 1
APRIL 2022
NTS 2
2022-1043
2022-1043 MEASURE S

CRESCENT CITY, CA

LEGEND AND NOTES
JDO
+/- 13+75+/- 13+98+/-
2'R+/- 4'R+/-
O
R
E
G
O
N
S
T.

M
A
R
S
H
A
L
L
S
T.
14+44+/-
14+56+/-
2'R+/-
4'R+/-
14+77+/-
14+87+/-
2'R+/-
4'R+/-
15+19+/-
15+42+/-
2'R+/-
10'R+/-
15+77+/-
15+82+/-
2'R+/-
4'R+/-
16+67+/-
16+77+/-
5'R+/-
10'R+/-
17+71+/-
17+74+/-
8'L+/-
6'L+/-

SS MANHOLE COLLAR REPLACE

SS MANHOLE COLLAR REPLACE
13+50 14+00 14+50 15+00 15+50 16+00 16+50 17+00 17+50 18+00 18+50 19+00 19+00

MATCHLINE
19+00

MATCHLINE
13+25

MATCHLINE
14+22+/-
8'L+/-
13+32+/-
11'L+/-
15+85+/-
6'L+/-
15+70+/-
15'L+/-
16+04+/-
8'L+/-
15+95+/-
15'L+/-
17+17+/-
3'L+/-
17+04+/-
9'L+/-
17+22+/-
8'L+/-
17+36+/-
4'L+/-
10+00
10+31+/-
10+55+/-
2'R+/-
9+92+/- 9+97+/-
2'R+/-
LIN
C
O
L
N
C
T.

HARDING AVE.
11+06+/-
11+16+/-
2'R+/-
11+31+/-
11+46+/-
2'R+/-
11+54+/-
11+86+/-
2'R+/-
8'R+/-
12+78+/-
12+99+/-
2'R+/- 6'R+/-
13+02+/- 13+06+/-
6'R+/-
8'R+/-
C
A
LIF
O
R
NIA
S
T.
4'R+/- 4'R+/-
4'R+/- 4'R+/-

INTERSECTION OF HARDING
& LINCOLN CT. CL
10+00
8+31+/- 4'L+/- 2'L+/-
8+04+/-
T
R
U
M
A
N
C
T.
7+50 8+00 8+50 9+00 9+50 10+50 11+00 11+50 12+00 12+50 13+00 13+25
13+25

MATCHLINE

MATCHLINE
13+25
MATC

C I V I L
J

ONATHAN OLSON
3 7
7 J
S
tre
e
t
C
re
s
c
e
n
t
City, CA
9 5
5 3
1 (
7 0
7)
4 6
4 -
9 5
0 6
p
h
o
n
e
(
7 0
7)
4 6
5 -
4 4
0 5
fax
C
I
T
Y
o
f
C
R
E
S
C
EN
T
C
I
T
Y

CHECKED BY
DATE
SCALE
JOB NO

DESIGN BY DRAWN BY

PRELIMINARY
N
O. R
E
VISIO
N
D
A
T
E
SHEET
FO
R
RED
U

CED PLA
N
S
O
RIGIN
AL S
C

ALE IS IN IN
C
HES
0 1
APRIL 2022
NTS
3 2022-1043
2 0
2 2
-
1 0
4 3
M
E
A
S
U
R
E
S
C
R
E
S
C
E
N
T
CIT
Y, C
A
H
A
R
DIN
G
A
V
E. P
L
A
N
S
T
A
TIO
N
7 +
5 0
T
O
1 9
+
0 0
JDO
NOTE: (E) HARDING HAS A 1" LIFT OF HMA OVER PETRO MAT.

NORTHCREST DR.
20+65+/-
20+79+/-
2'R+/-
4'R+/-
21+14+/-
21+45+/-
4'L+/-
2'L+/-
19+00 19+50 20+00 20+50 21+00 21+50 22+00 22+50
19+00

MATCHLINE
19+00

MATCHLINE

CRACK SEAL AT MANHOLE
19+24+/-
19+54+/-
10'L+/-
7'L+/-
19+81+/-
20+02+/-
2'R+/-
6'R+/-
19+91+/-
21+12+/-
6'R+/-
9'R+/-
C
I
V
I
L

JONATHA
N
OLSON
377 J Street
Crescent City, CA 95531
(707) 464-9506 phone
(707) 465-4405 fax
CITY of CRESCENT CITY

CHECKED BY
DATE
SCALE
JOB NO
DESIGN BY DRAWN BY PRELIMINARY NO. REVISION DATE
SHEET

FOR REDUCED PLANS

ORIGINAL SCALE IS IN INCHES
0 1
APRIL 2022
NTS 4
2022-1043
2022-1043 MEASURE S

CRESCENT CITY, CA
HARDING AVE. PLAN STATION 19+00 TO 22+50
JDO
7 T
H
S
T.
6 T
H
S
T.
5 T
H
S
T.
10+00 STARTING AT C OF 7TH ST. & H ST.

H ST.
11+68+/-
12+18+/-
12+24+/-
12+68+/-
11+88+/-
13+44+/-
15+02+/-
13+92+/-
14+28+/-
15+23+/-
10'R+/-
4'R+/-
8'R+/-
15'L+/-
3'R+/-
16+00
16+74+/- 16+68+/-
14'L+/- 6'L+/-
11+45
11+26
12+05
14+96 13+38
17+95 17+21
44' 16'
12' 26'
12' 26'
10'

STREET SIGN
8+50 18+00 17+50 17+00 16+50 16+00 15+50 15+00 14+50 14+00 13+50 13+00 12+50 12+00 11+50 11+00 10+50

RAISE VALVES TO GRADE SIDEWALK REPAIR

SIDEWALK REPAIR
2' WIDE
2' WIDE

WALK AROUND WALK AROUND

WALK AROUND

WALK AROUND

WALK AROUND WALK AROUND
18+50
E

MATCHLINE
8'R
13'R+/-
6'R+/-
4'L+/-
13'R
9+80+/-
10+18+/-
40'R+/-
12+82+/-
40'R+/-
13+18+/-
12+90+/-
28'R+/-
13+10+/-
28'R+/-
50'L+/-
16+00+/-
14+98+/-
11'L+/-
68'L+/-
20'L+/-
4 T
H
S
T.
3 R
D
S
T.
2 N
D
S
T.

F
R
O
N
T
S
T.
25+18+/-
26+09+/- 1'R+/-
26+66+/-
5'R+/-
11'R+/-
24+66+/-
18'L+/-
24+82+/-
38'R+/-
19+30
20+36
20+07
23+68
24+27
26+64 25+77 27+25
26+08
26+53
20' 20' 24'
24' 24' 18'
18'
28'
10'
10'

POWER POLE
28+00 27+50 27+00 26+50 26+00 25+50 25+00 24+50 24+00 23+50 23+00 22+50 22+00 21+50 21+00 20+50 20+00 19+50 19+00 18+5

RAISE TO GRADE

NEW CURB AND GUTTER

WALK AROUND

WALK AROUND

WALK AROUND

WALK AROUND

WALK AROUND

WALK AROUND WALK AROUND

REPLACE SIDEWALK
AT TREE WELL 18+50

MATCHLINE

WALK AROUND WALK AROUND
26+37+/- RAISE TO GRADE
18'R+/-
25+95+/-
18'R+/-
25+18+/-
18'R+/-

C I V I L
J

ONATHAN OLSON
3 7
7 J
S
tre
e
t
C
re
s
c
e
n
t
City, CA
9 5
5 3
1 (
7 0
7)
4 6
4 -
9 5
0 6
p
h
o
n
e
(
7 0
7)
4 6
5 -
4 4
0 5
fax
C
I
T
Y
o
f
C
R
E
S
C
EN
T
C
I
T
Y

CHECKED BY
DATE
SCALE
JOB NO

DESIGN BY DRAWN BY

PRELIMINARY
N
O. R
E
VISIO
N
D
A
T
E
SHEET
FO
R
RED
U

CED PLA
N
S
O
RIGIN
AL S
C

ALE IS IN IN
C
HES
0 1
APRIL 2022
NTS
5 2022-1043
2 0
2 2
-
1 0
4 3
M
E
A
S
U
R
E
S
C
R
E
S
C
E
N
T
CIT
Y, C
A
H
S
T
R
E
E
T
P
L
A
N
S
T
A
TIO
N
1 0
+
0 0
T
O
2 8
+
0 0
JDO
C
S
T.

B
S
T.

A
S
T.
10+00 AT C OF A ST &
9TH ST. INTERSECTION
11+17+/- 11+91+/-
11+45+/- 11+91+/- 12+54+/-
13+95+/- 15+22+/-
8+73+/- 9+50+/-
8+47+/-
8+00 8+50 9+00 9+50 10+50 11+00 11+50 12+00 12+50 13+00 13+50 14+00 14+50 15+00 15+50 16+00 16+5

SIDEWALK PATCH

AT WATER METER
7+75

MATCHLINE
16+50

MATCHLINE

FILL W/ BACKER ROD
& CRACK SEAL
13+27+/-
13'L+/-
13+47+/-
9'L+/-
H
U
N
TIN
G
T
O
N
S
T.

J
A
C
C
A
R
D
S
T.

A
N
ZIO
S
T.

G
AIN
A
R
D
S
T.

T
A
Y
L
O
R
S
T.

W
E
N
D
A
L
L
S
T.
9TH ST.
6+49+/-
6+09+/-
5+45+/-
1+00+/- 2+02+/- 3+66+/- 4+08+/- 4+52+/- 6+09+/-
+00 +50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+00 4+50 5+00 5+50 6+00 6+50 7+00 7+50

NEW ADA

NEW CROSSWALK STRIPING

SIDEWALK GRIND

SIDEWALK GRIND

REPLACE SIDEWALK

REPLACE SIDEWALK REPLACE SIDEWALK

SIDEWALK GRIND

SIDEWALK GRIND
7+75

MATCHLINE
5+52+/-
MAJOR LIFTING OF 2

PANELS ON SIDEWALK
REPLACE.

COORDINATE W/

SPECTRUM/FRONTIER
4+98+/-
33'L+/-
5+18+/-
23'L+/-

C I V I L
J

ONATHAN OLSON
3 7
7 J
S
tre
e
t
C
re
s
c
e
n
t
City, CA
9 5
5 3
1 (
7 0
7)
4 6
4 -
9 5
0 6
p
h
o
n
e
(
7 0
7)
4 6
5 -
4 4
0 5
fax
C
I
T
Y
o
f
C
R
E
S
C
EN
T
C
I
T
Y

CHECKED BY
DATE
SCALE
JOB NO

DESIGN BY DRAWN BY

PRELIMINARY
N
O. R
E
VISIO
N
D
A
T
E
SHEET
FO
R
RED
U

CED PLA
N
S
O
RIGIN
AL S
C

ALE IS IN IN
C
HES
0 1
APRIL 2022
NTS
6 2022-1043
2 0
2 2
-
1 0
4 3
M
E
A
S
U
R
E
S
C
R
E
S
C
E
N
T
CIT
Y, C
A
9 T
H
S
T
R
E
E
T
P
L
A
N
S
T
A
TIO
N
0 0
T
O
1 6
+
5 0
JDO
E ST.

D ST.
16+88+/- 17+92+/-
17+84+/- 20+11+/- 20+67+/-
20+28+/- 21+41+/-
24+21+/-
6+50 17+00 17+50 18+00 18+50 19+00 19+50 20+00 20+50 21+00 21+50 22+00 22+50 23+00 23+50 24+00 24+5 24+50

MATCHLINE
16+50
E

MATCHLINE

REPLACE
H ST.

G ST.

F ST.
9TH ST.
25+41+/- 25+95+/- 29+02+/-
29+90+/-
28+78+/- 29+30+/- 29+90+/-
4+50 25+00 25+50 26+00 26+50 27+00 27+50 28+00 28+50 29+00 29+50 30+00 30+50 31+00

RAISE TO GRADE

RAISE TO GRADE

SIDEWALK REPAIR
AT WATER METER 30+25+/-
10'R+/-
30+19+/-
0'L+/-
24+50
E

MATCHLINE

NEW COLLAR
28+04+/-
21'L+/-
28+14+/-
12'L+/-
28+15+/-
17'R+/-
28+05+/-
7'L+/-
C
I
V
I
L

JONATHA
N
OLSON
377 J Street
Crescent City, CA 95531
(707) 464-9506 phone
(707) 465-4405 fax
CITY of CRESCENT CITY

CHECKED BY
DATE
SCALE
JOB NO
DESIGN BY DRAWN BY PRELIMINARY NO. REVISION DATE
SHEET

FOR REDUCED PLANS

ORIGINAL SCALE IS IN INCHES
0 1
APRIL 2022
NTS 7
2022-1043
2022-1043 MEASURE S

CRESCENT CITY, CA
9TH STREET PLAN STATION 16+50 TO 31+00
JDO
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10% Max . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

R/W (Typ)
45°
RAMP

DRIVEWAY WIDTH

4.5' 3.0'
W Var 3.0'

4.5'
Var

3.0'
45°
10% Max

DEPRESSED

SIDEWALK
Var
CASE A
Typical driveway, sidewalk not depressed
CASE B
Driveway with depressed sidewalk
PLAN

ELEVATION

DRIVEWAYS

SECTIONS

ROUNDED

SIDEWALK

SIDEWALK

GUTTER GRADE

ROUNDED

CURB FACE

BOTTOM OF CURB
~

LIP AT BOTTOM OF

DRIVEWAY RAMP,
1/2" ABOVE

GUTTER GRADE

LIP AT BOTTOM OF

DRIVEWAY RAMP,
1/2" ABOVE

GUTTER GRADE
1 .5
%
M
a
x
1 .5
%
M
a
x
~

STRAIGHT
GRADE
T, SEE NOTE 3

SIDEWALK,
SEE NOTE 5
SEE NOTE 5
T, SEE NOTE 3

3.0'
SEE
NOTE 2
1" LIP 6"

4.2'

9.5' COMM SW

7.5% Max

5.5' RES

7.5%
Max

TYP TYP

DRIVEWAY
VARIABLE WIDTH ("THROAT")

5.5'

10.0' 4.0'

ADDITIONAL FLARE

COMMERCIAL/ RESIDENTIAL

3.0'

PW STYLE WING UP

5.5'

PROPERTY LINE- R/W PROPERTY LINE- R/W

CALTRANS STYLE WING UP

GUTTER PAN

5.5'
12 " OR
34 " LIP OK

5.5'

12.0'-24.0' RESIDENTIAL

24.0'-30.0' COMMERCIAL

30.0'-40.0' INDUSTRIAL

ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL
6"

VARIABLE SLOPE

ADJUST DRIVEWAY
TO MEET 13%

EXISTING STREET SLOPE
+ DRIVEWAY SLOPE SHALL BE
LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO 13%
10"
MAINTAIN 48"

AT CORNERS

TYPICAL
45°

STANDARD WIDTHS

14.5" 20.5"

4.5% MAX 4.5% MAX

5.0' TRANSITION PANEL

IF MATCHING SIDEWALK
GREATER THAN 2%

TYPICAL

1.5% MAX
8% MAX

MATCH EXISTING
ELEVATION AT B.O.W.
= FLOW LINE PLUS 6" MIN
45°
6" THICKNESS WITH REBAR

PERIMETER OF NEW DRIVEWAY

1.5% MAX
#3 - 24" O.C. E.W.

INTERSECTS AT

BACK OF WALK

TYPICAL

INDUSTRIAL

ADA DRIVEWAY

ADA DRIVEWAY
1 2
12 12
C
I
V
I
L

JONATHA
N
OLSON
377 J Street
Crescent City, CA 95531
(707) 464-9506 phone
(707) 465-4405 fax
CITY of CRESCENT CITY

CHECKED BY
DATE
SCALE
JOB NO
DESIGN BY DRAWN BY PRELIMINARY NO. REVISION DATE
SHEET

FOR REDUCED PLANS

ORIGINAL SCALE IS IN INCHES
0 1
APRIL 2022
VARIES 8
2022-1043
2022-1043 MEASURE S

CRESCENT CITY, CA

ADA DRIVEWAY DETAIL
JDO
1"=4'
1"=4'
5'-10"

9.0% MAX

AT CURB

PROPERTY LINE
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y
LIN
E

7.5% MAX

1.5% MAX

1.5% MAX

7.5% MAX

5.0'

1.5% MAX

1.5% MAX

7.5% MAX
4'-2" MIN
4'-0"

9.0%
MAX
AT
CU
RB

7.5% MAX
RADIUS 10.0'
+/- 1
2 " MAX
10'-0"
C
R
O
S
S
W
A
L
K IF
P
R
O
VID
E
D
5% MAX
AT FL

1.5% MAX

1.5% MAX
6'-0"
10'-0"
6"
5%
MAX
AT
FL
5% MAX
FLARE
24" MIN
A
B
A
B
4'-2"
FLARE

TRANSITION
"W2"
R=1"
R=1"
R=1"
1"
R=1/2"
2"
R=1/2"
"W2" "W2"
R=1"
"W2"
3"
"H1"
"W1"
"H2"
"W1"
"H1"
"H2"
"W1"
"H1"
"H2"
"H1"
"H2"
"W1" "W1"
"W2"
"H2"
"H1"
"W1"
"W2"
"H1"
"H2"
"W1"
"W2"
"H1"
"H2"
ES

FINISHED

ROADWAY

SURFACE

TABLE A
CURB

QUANTITIES
TYPE A1 CURBS
See Table A
TYPE A3 CURBS
Superimposed on existing pavement
See Table A
TYPE A2 CURBS
See Table A
TYPE B1 CURBS
See Table A
TYPE B3 CURBS
Superimposed on existing pavement
See Table A
TYPE B2 CURBS
See Table A
TYPE B4 CURBS
See Table A

TYPE D CURBS TYPE E CURB

TYPE H CURB
On Bridges
CURBS
4:1
6"
6"
R=1/2"
6"
R=1/2"
5"
R=1/2" R=1/2"
8"
5" 2'-0"
6"
R=1/2"
R=1/2"
6"
#4

LONGITUDINAL
BAR #4 DOWEL SPACED 4'-0"
Min LENGTH 8"
5" R=1/2"
#4

LONGITUDINAL
BAR #4 DOWEL SPACED 4'-0"
Min LENGTH 8"
5"
8"
7" 2" 2'-0"
R=1/2"
R=1/2"
9"
6"
2'-9"
R=1/2"
R=1/2"
1'-0"
3"
1'-0"
R=6"
4"
R=1'-0"
2'-0"
6"
"H1"
1'-2"
1'-4"
1'-0"
1'-2"
6"
8"
1'-0"
1'-2"
10"
1'-0"
4"
6"
10"
1'-0"
"H2"
6"
8"
6"
8"
5"
7"
4"
6"
4"
6"
3"
5"
4"
6"
"W1"
71/2"
8"
2'-71/2"
2'-8"
71/4"
73/4"
71/2"
9"
2'-71/2"
2'-9"
7"
81/2"
1'-6"
2'-2"
2'-0"

BRIDGE SIDEWALK

FACE OF CURB
2" OR Var
2" OR Var
2" OR Var
"W2"
11/2"
2"
11/2"
2"
11/4"
13/4"
21/2"
4"
21/2"
4"
2"
31/2"
1'-1"
1'-9"
NOTES:

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

0.02585

0.03084

0.05903

0.06379

0.01036

0.01435

0.02185

0.02930

0.05515

0.06171

0.00641

0.01074

0.05709

0.04083

0.06804

0.06661

CUBIC YARDS

PER LINEAR FOOT

CURB DIMENSIONS
TYPE
A1-6
A1-8
A2-6
A2-8
A3-6
A3-8
B1-4
B1-6
B2-4
B2-6
B3-4
B3-6
D-4
D-6
A1-6
A1-8
A2-6
A2-8
A3-6
A3-8
B1-4
B1-6
B2-4
B2-6
B3-4
B3-6
B4
D-4
D-6
E
TYPE

CURBS AND DRIVEWAYS

1.5% Max
SEE NOTE 7
SEE NOTE 7 SEE NOTE 7
Case A driveway section typically applies.

X=3'-0" except for curb heights over 10" where
4:1 slopes shall be used on curb slope.

Sidewalk and ramp thickness "T" at driveway shall
be 4" for residential and 6" for commercial.

Difference in slope of the driveway ramp and the
slope of a line between the gutter and a point on
the roadway 5'-0" from gutter line shall not
exceed 15%. Reduce driveway ramp slope, not
gutter slope, where required.

1. 2.

3. 4.

5. 6.

7. Minimum width of clear passageway for sidewalk
shall be 4'-2".

Retaining curbs and acquisition of construction
easement may be necessary for narrow sidewalks
or curb heights in excess of 6".

Across the pedestrian route at curb ramp locations,
the gutter pan slope shall not exceed 1" of depth
for each 2'-0" of width.
2018 STANDARD PLAN A87A
A87A

SECTION A-A
1:30
4'-2" 5'-0" 10" 24" VARIABLE-48" MAX

1.5% MAX

7.5% MAX
5% MAX

VARIABLE
SLOPE
1"=4'

ADA CURB RAMP

ADA CURB RAMP CROSS SECTION
2 1 CURBS
13 A
13 13

C I V I L
J

ONATHAN OLSON
3 7
7 J
S
tre
e
t
C
re
s
c
e
n
t
City, CA
9 5
5 3
1 (
7 0
7)
4 6
4 -
9 5
0 6
p
h
o
n
e
(
7 0
7)
4 6
5 -
4 4
0 5
fax
C
I
T
Y
o
f
C
R
E
S
C
EN
T
C
I
T
Y

CHECKED BY
DATE
SCALE
JOB NO

DESIGN BY DRAWN BY

PRELIMINARY
N
O. R
E
VISIO
N
D
A
T
E
SHEET
FO
R
RED
U

CED PLA
N
S
O
RIGIN
AL S
C

ALE IS IN IN
C
HES
0 1
APRIL 2022
VARIES
9 2022-1043
2 0
2 2
-
1 0
4 3
M
E
A
S
U
R
E
S
C
R
E
S
C
E
N
T
CIT
Y, C
A
A
D
A
C
U
R
B
R
A
M
P
S
A
N
D
C
U
R
B
S
JDO
NTS
ADDENDUM NO. 1 FOR

INVITATION TO BID

MEASURE S COLLECTOR STREET MAINTENANCE & PRESERVATION