1 | P a g e
6/20/22 COUNCIL AGENDA
CITY OF CRESCENT CITY
Mayor Jason Greenough Mayor Pro Tem Isaiah Wright
Council Member Raymond Altman Council Member Beau Smith Council Member Blake Inscore
MONDAY JUNE 20, 2022 6:00 P.M.
ZOOM PHONE NUMBER: (253) 215-8782
ZOOM WEBINAR ID: 884 8959 0916
MUTE / UNMUTE PRESS *6
RAISE HAND PRESS *9
The public may access and participate in the public meeting using one or more of the following methods:
1) Attend the meeting in person, public comment at the podium will be allowed. 2) Participate live online via Zoom (details below) or by utilizing the link to join the meeting posted on both the City of Crescent City – City Hall Facebook page and the City of Crescent City website (www.crescentcity.org), public comment may be made by using the raise hand feature on Zoom;
3) Watch the meeting via livestream on YouTube (channel: City of Crescent City, California), public comment may be made by calling in to the meeting using the Zoom phone number; 4) Public comments may be made in advance by submitting written comment via [email protected] or by filing it with the City Clerk at 377 J Street, Crescent City, California, 95531. All public comments (via email or mail) must be received by the City Clerk prior to 12:00 p.m. the day of the meeting. Please identify the meeting date and agenda item to which your comment pertains in the subject line. Public comments so received will be forwarded to the City Council and posted on the website next to the agenda. Written public comments will not be read aloud during the meeting.
Notice regarding Americans with Disabilities Act: In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in the meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s office at (707)464-7483, ext. 223. Notification 48 hours before the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting [28 CFR 35.102-
35.104 ADA Title II]. For TTYDD use for speech and hearing impaired, please dial 711. A full agenda packet may be reviewed at City Hall, 377 J Street, Crescent City, CA or on our website:
www.crescentcity.org
OPEN SESSION
Call to order
Roll call
Pledge of Allegiance
AGENDA
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
FLYNN CENTER BOARD CHAMBERS
981 H STREET
CRESCENT CITY, CA 95531
2 | P a g e
6/20/22 COUNCIL AGENDA
CEREMONIAL ITEMS
1. Recognition of Police Officer Tyler Balch
2. Proclamation in recognition of Sunrise Rotary
PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD
Any member of the audience is invited to address the City Council on any matter that is within the jurisdiction of the City of Crescent City. Comments of public interest or on matters appearing on the agenda are accepted. Note, however, that the Council is not able to undertake extended discussion or act on non-agendized items. Such items can be referred to staff for appropriate action, which may include placement on a future agenda. All comments shall be directed toward the entire Council. Any comments that are not at the microphone are out of order and will not be a part of the public record. After receiving recognition from the Mayor, please state your name and city or county residency for the record. Public comment is limited to three (3) minutes. The public is additionally allotted three minutes each in which to speak on any item on the agenda prior to any action taken by the Council.
REPORTS AND PRESENTATIONS
3. Performing Arts Center Presentation
CONSENT CALENDAR
4. Council Meeting Minutes
• Recommendation: Approve the June 6, 2022 regular meeting minutes of the City Council.
5. Warrant Claims List
• Recommendation: Receive and file the warrant claims list for the period May 28, 2022, through June 10, 2022.
6. Payroll Report
• Recommendation: Receive and file the biweekly payroll report for the period ending June 4, 2022, paid June 10, 2022.
7. COWI contract extension
• Recommendation: Approve and authorize the City Manager to sign Task Order 2.0 with COWI to extend the term of the contract from September 30, 2020 to June 30, 2023
8. Note restructure with Keven Bingham for 308 G Street • Recommendation: Approve and authorize the City Manager to sign an Amendment to Installment Note with Keven Bingham as presented
9. Human Resources Department budget amendment
• Recommendation: Approve and adopt Resolution No. 2022-41, A RESOLUTION OF
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CRESCENT CITY AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2021-22 BUDGET OF THE CITY OF CRESCENT CITY
3 | P a g e
6/20/22 COUNCIL AGENDA
CONTINUING BUSINESS - None
RESERVE POLICY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CRESCENT CITY APPROVING A GENERAL FUND • Approve and adopt Resolution No. 2022-47, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
FOR CERTAIN CONTRACT POSITIONS
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CRESCENT CITY REVISING THE SALARY SCHEDULE • Approve and adopt Resolution No. 2022-46, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY 23 APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR THE CITY OF CRESCENT CITY
ADJUSTMENT FACTORS FOR THE CALCULATION OF THE FISCAL YEAR 2022-
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CRESCENT CITY SELECTING THE ANNUAL • Approve and adopt Resolution No. 2022-45, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY APPENDICES, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-23
OF THE CITY OF CRESCENT CITY, INCLUDING ANY ATTACHMENTS AND/OR
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CRESCENT CITY ADOPTING THE ANNUAL BUDGET • Approve and adopt Resolution No. 2022-44, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY • Close public hearing
• Further Council discussion
• Receive public comment
• Technical questions from the Council
• Hear staff report
• Recommendation: Open public hearing
Reserve Policy
15. Fiscal Year 2022-23 Budget, Position Control, Appropriations Limit, and General Fund
PUBLIC HEARING
communities strategies: climate goals
Transportation planning: regional transportation improvement plan: sustainable • Recommendation: Direct staff to draft a letter in opposition to AB 2237 –
14. AB 2237 – Transportation Planning
Hospital’s application for Hospice Licensing
• Recommendation: Authorize the Mayor to sign a letter of support for Sutter Coast
13. Letter of support for Sutter Coast Hospital’s application for Hospice License • Recommendation: Council direction to staff as necessary and appropriate regulation to reduce water demand and improve water conservation
12. Report on annual water supply and demand assessment and recent emergency BOARD (ORDER R1-2022-0021)
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WITH THE REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CRESCENT CITY APPROVING A • Recommendation: Approve and adopt Resolution No. 2022-42, A RESOLUTION OF (WWTP) effluent limitation exceedances
11. Settlement Agreement with the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) for Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) grants
• Authorize City staff in conjunction with PlanWest Partners, Inc. to apply for two the City of Crescent City
• Recommendation: Receive and file the final report of the Local Road Safety Plan for
10. Local Road Safety Plan for the City of Crescent City 4 | P a g e
6/20/22 COUNCIL AGENDA
NEW BUSINESS
16. General Plan Annual Progress Report
• Recommendation: Hear staff report
• Technical questions from the Council
• Receive public comment
• Further Council discussion
• Provide further direction to staff about the General Plan Annual Progress Report
17. Johnson Controls Agreement for Pool Renovation
• Recommendation: Hear staff report
• Technical questions from the Council
• Receive public comment
• Further Council discussion
• Approve and authorize the City Manager to sign the Agreement for Fred Endert Municipal Pool Building Improvements with Johnson Controls, for the renovation of the Fred Endert Municipal Swimming Pool HVAC and other systems
18. Police Station and City Hall Design Contracts
• Recommendation: Hear staff report
• Technical questions from the Council
• Receive public comment
• Further Council discussion
• Approve and authorize the City Manager to sign Task Order 1 – Police Station Renovation Design with Calpo Hom & Dong Architects in the amount of $110,000 to complete the Plans, Specifications, and Engineer’s estimate of construction cost for renovation
• Approve and authorize the City Manager to sign Task Order – New City Hall Renovation Design with Calpo Hom & Dong Architects in the amount of $155,000 to complete the Plans, Specifications, and Engineer’s estimate of construction cost for renovation
19. Selection of GreenWorks, PC for design of Beachfront Park Master Plan Phase 1 • Recommendation: Hear staff report
• Technical questions from the Council
• Receive public comment
• Further Council discussion
• Approve and authorize the City Manager to sign a professional services agreement with GreenWorks, PC for the Design of the Beachfront Park Master Plan Phase 1
20. 2022 Measure S Street collector street maintenance and preservation project • Recommend: Hear staff report
• Technical questions from the Council
• Receive public comment
• Further Council discussion
• Approve the plans and specifications and award the 2022 Measure S Collector Street Maintenance and Preservation Project to Hemmingsen Contracting Co., Inc., authorize the City Manager to sign an agreement with said contractor, and authorize the City Manager to approve and sign change orders in an aggregate amount not to exceed available contingency funds
5 | P a g e
6/20/22 COUNCIL AGENDA
21. Initiative to repeal Measure S
• Recommendation: Hear staff report
• Technical questions from the Council
• Receive public comment
• Further Council discussion
• Approve and adopt Resolution No. 2022-48, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CRESCENT CITY CALLING FOR THE ADDITION OF AN INITIATIVE MEASURE TO THE NOVEMBER 8, 2022 MUNICIPAL ELECTION BALLOT
• Direct staff to report back to the Council on the impact to essential City services of a successful repeal of Measure S
22. Selection of City District Representative for Golden State Risk Management Authority (GSRMA) Board of Directors
• Recommendation: Hear staff report
• Technical question from the Council
• Receive public comment
• Further Council discussion
• Select one City Council Member to serve on the GSRMA Board of Directors for 2022- 2024
CITY COUNCIL ITEMS
➢ Legislative Matters – Consider miscellaneous legislative matters pertinent to the City of Crescent City. Authorize the Mayor to sign the appropriate letters and/or positions with respect to such matters.
➢ City Manager Report and City Council Directives – Pursuant to Crescent City Municipal Code § 2.08.200, the City Council may instruct the city manager on matters of importance to the administrative services of the City and provide direction with respect to subordinates of the City Manager. (Directives from individual Council Members that are not objected to by any member present shall be considered an order of the City Council.) • Pool ceiling update
➢ Reports, Concerns, Referrals, Council travel and training reports – In accordance with Gov’t Code § 54954.2(a), City Council Members may make brief announcements or brief reports on their own activities. They may ask questions for clarification, make a referral to staff or take action to have staff place a matter of business on a future agenda.
ADJOURNMENT
Adjourn to the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Crescent City scheduled for Tuesday, July 5, 2022 at 6:00 p.m. in the Flynn Center, 981 H Street, Crescent City, CA 95531.
POSTED:
June16, 2022
/s/ Robin Patch
City Clerk/Administrative Analyst
6 | P a g e
6/20/22 COUNCIL AGENDA
Vision:
The City of Crescent City will continue to stand the test of time and promote quality of life and community pride for our residents, businesses and visitors through leadership, diversity, and teamwork.
Mission:
The purpose of our city is to promote a high quality of life, leadership and services to the residents, businesses, and visitors we serve. The City is dedicated to providing the most efficient, innovative and economically sound municipal services building on our diverse history, culture and unique natural resources.
Values:
Accountability
Honesty & Integrity
Excellent Customer Service
Effective & Active Communication
Teamwork
Fiscally Responsible
Recognition
of
Police Officer Tyler Balch
Proclamation
of the
City of Crescent City
WHEREAS, the Del Norte Sunrise Rotary was chartered in 1995 when the Crescent City Rotary Club’s membership grew too large; and
WHEREAS, members have been very active around the community not only with numerous infrastructure projects, but empowering Del Norte youth; and WHEREAS, the members of the Sunrise Rotary helped build Kid Town and recently had a special needs swing installed. They have built and landscaped an outdoor meeting center for CASA, built and landscaped houses for Habitat for Humanity; and
WHEREAS, they have built computer labs, classrooms, medical facilities, water lines, and cafeterias for villages in Mexico; and
WHEREAS, they have painted and refurbished bleachers at the high school, the fairgrounds restrooms, the library, the Harrington House playground, Bess Maxwell and Redwood School playgrounds, Battery Point Lighthouse fences and picnic area, as well as painting the Veteran’s Hall and refinishing the floor; and
WHEREAS, Rotary has been involved in Crescent City’s Sister City relationship by installing two Peace Poles, one here in Crescent City and one in Rikuzentakata and they helped finance the return of Kamome; and
WHEREAS, they have distributed over $100,000 in scholarships for Del Norte High seniors, helped over 50 students to build life changing experiences through their Student Exchange Program for both incoming and outgoing students, they yearly send 4-6 students to leadership training opportunities; and
WHEREAS, Del Norte Sunrise Rotary has countless community support endeavors that have enriched the lives of our youth and elderly; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Crescent City does hereby recognize the Del Norte Sunrise Rotary for their years of community engagement and involvement, beautifying Crescent City and enriching the lives of our young people. The City Council encourages all citizens to consider joining a volunteer group and make a difference in our community. _________________________________
Mayor Jason Greenough
PERFORMING
ARTS
CENTER
PRESENTATION
1 | P a g e
6/6/22 COUNCIL MINUTES
CITY OF CRESCENT CITY
Mayor Jason Greenough Mayor Pro Tem Isaiah Wright
Council Member Raymond Altman Council Member Beau Smith Council Member Blake Inscore
MONDAY JUNE 6, 2022 6:00 P.M.
**CLOSED SESSION HAD BEEN CANCELLED**
OPEN SESSION
Call to order Mayor Pro Tem Wright called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
Roll call Council Members present: Council Member Ray Altman, Council Member Blake Inscore, Council Member Beau Smith, and Mayor Pro Tem Isaiah Wright
Council Member absent: Mayor Jason Greenough
Staff present: City Manager Eric Wier, City
Clerk/Administrative Analyst Robin Patch, Human Resources Manager Sunny Valero, City Engineer Jon Olson, Finance
Director Linda Leaver, Public Works Maintenance Manager Jason Wylie, Fire Chief Bill Gillespie, Fire Chief Kevin Carey, and Police Chief Richard Griffin
Pledge of Allegiance led by Mayor Pro Tem Wright
CEREMONIAL ITEMS
1. Fire Chief Bill Gillespie retirement
City Manager Wier gave a detailed history of Chief Gillespie’s employment as Fire Chief for the City of Crescent City to include a PowerPoint presentation of photos throughout his career as a firefighter. Chief Gillespie thanked the Council for the recognition and spoke of his appreciation of the firefighters.
2. Recognition of Police Officer Tyler Balch
City Manager Wier explained that this item will be postponed until the following meeting so that Yurok Tribal Police Chief O’Rourke could attend to honor Officer Balch.
MINUTES
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
FLYNN CENTER BOARD CHAMBERS
981 H STREET
CRESCENT CITY, CA 95531
2 | P a g e
6/6/22 COUNCIL MINUTES
On a motion by Council Member Smith, seconded by Council Member Inscore, and carried on a 4-0 polled vote, with Mayor Greenough being absent, the City Council of the City of Crescent City approved moving the recognition of Police Officer Balch until the June 20, 2022 Council meeting.
3. Introduction of Crescent City Police Department Volunteers – Gloria Bobertz and Ranell Chisman
Police Chief Griffin introduced Gloria Bobertz and Ranell Chisman who have been volunteering at the police department to help with missing persons cases. Ms. Bobertz explained that she and Ms. Chisman will be having trained cadaver dogs to help in searching for missing people as well.
4. Introduction of new employees: Tim Corcilius, Seasonal Maintenance Worker 1; Jonathan Gaetke, Seasonal Maintenance Worker 1; Grant Hodges, Electrical Maintenance Operations Technician 1
Public Works Maintenance Manager introduced the new employees to the Council and what each one of them brings to offer the City. In particular, Jonathan Gaetke has painted a lot of different pieces around town such as the anchor on Front Street which now says “Crescent City” as well as the wooden teddy bear by Kid Town.
PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD
The following citizen addressed the Council:
Roger Gitlin: would like to see Seasonal Maintenance Worker Gaetke paint an American flag on a spot just outside of the city limits where an old painted flag is. Spoke about code enforcement for the weeds growing in the sidewalks, curbs and gutters. Asked for the Council to take up action on a future agenda to support Sutter Coast Hospital to obtain Hospice licensing.
CONSENT CALENDAR
5. Council Meeting Minutes
• Recommendation: Approve the April 4, 2022 regular meeting minutes, the April 18, 2022 regular meeting minutes, and the May 2, 2022 regular meeting minutes of the City Council.
6. Warrant Claims List
• Recommendation: Receive and file the warrant claims list for the period May 7, 2022, through May 27, 2022.
7. Payroll Report
• Recommendation: Receive and file the biweekly payroll report for the period ending May 21, 2022, paid May 27, 2022.
8. Budget-to-Actual for the month of April 2022
• Recommendation: Receive and file the budget-to-actual for the month of April 2022
9. Consolidation of the 2022 General Municipal Election • Recommendation: Approve and adopt Resolution No. 2022-40, A RESOLUTION OF
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CRESCENT CITY DECLARING THE DATE OF THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION OF 2022, SPECIFYING THE OFFICES TO BE FILLED, AND REQUESTING CONSOLIDATION OF THE NOVEMBER 8, 2022 CITY OF CRESCENT CITY ELECTION WITH THE NOVEMBER 8, 2022
STATEWIDE GENERAL ELECTION
3 | P a g e
6/6/22 COUNCIL MINUTES
10. SyTec Solutions Budget Amendment
• Recommendation: Approve and adopt Resolution No. 2022-31, A RESOLUTION OF
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CRESCENT CITY AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2021-22 BUDGET OF THE CITY OF CRESCENT CITY
11. Review of Draft Budget and Approval Process for the Del Norte Solid Waste Management Authority
• Recommendation: Take no action; a lack of response is to be treated as approval of the budget as presented, or:
• If there are any specific comments that should be addressed by the Del Norte Solid Waste Management Authority Board before adoption of this budget, such written comments should be approved and submitted to the Authority. If there is a written objection to the proposed Authority budget, this body should also designate a representative to be present at the Authority meeting scheduled for June 21st so such concerns may be resolved and the Authority may adopt a budget for Fiscal Year 2022/2023 before June 30, 2022.
There were no public comments on the consent calendar.
On a motion by Council Member Inscore, seconded by Council Member Smith, and carried on a 4-0 polled vote with Mayor Greenough being absent, the City Council of the City of Crescent City adopted the consent calendar consisting of items 5-11 as presented.
PUBLIC HEARING
12. Military Equipment Use Policy (AB 481)
• Recommendation: Open public hearing
• Hear staff report
• Technical questions from the Council
• Receive public comment
• Close public hearing
• Further Council discussion
• Waive full reading, read by title only and adopt Ordinance No. 830, AN ORDINANCE
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CRESCENT CITY APPROVING A MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE POLICY AS REQUIRED BY AB 481
Mayor Pro Tem Wright opened the public hearing at 6:44 p.m. City Attorney Rice reported to the Council stated that this is a policy required by AB 481 which was introduced over a month ago.
The Policy defines what is considered military equipment, which includes equipment that are used by law enforcement agencies all over the country, to include, but not limited to, unmanned aerial or ground vehicles, armored vehicles, command and control vehicles, pepper balls, less lethal shotguns, less lethal 40mm projectile launchers, long range acoustic devices, and flashbangs.
Some of items deemed to be “military equipment” by AB 481 are in fact employed by CCPD, and LEA’s across the country, in order to specifically reduce risk to community members. The policy must address the following matters for each type of military equipment:
(1) description, quantity, capabilities, lifespan, and manufacturer product descriptions; (2) the purposes and authorized uses for each type of military equipment; (3) fiscal impact including the initial costs of obtaining the equipment and annual costs of maintenance;
(4) the legal and procedural rules that govern each authorize use; and (5) the training, including any course required by POST, that must be completed before an officer may use each specific type of military equipment.
4 | P a g e
6/6/22 COUNCIL MINUTES
The policy must also detail the mechanisms to ensure compliance with the policy, and must also provide procedures by which members of the public may register complaints or concerns or submit questions about the use of each specific type of military equipment. After the policy is in effect, the police department will have to annually report to the community and the City Council on its use of military equipment for each year. The City Council will have to also approve the policy, even if there are no changes, on an annual basis. She outlined the public hearing procedures and how it had been published. Chief Griffin clarified that this is not like the 1033 program, which is borrowing military equipment. He further stated he is working with OES to get funding for a drone for any emergencies that make it difficult for an officer to gain access, such as a tsunami. He also stated that this is basic equipment that all law enforcement agencies use.
There were no public comments.
Mayor Pro Tem Wright closed the public hearing at 6:51 p.m.
On a motion by Council Member Inscore, seconded by Council Member Altman, and carried on a 4-0 polled vote with Mayor Greenough being absent, the City Council of the City of Crescent City waived full reading, read by title only and adopted Ordinance No. 830, AN ORDINANCE OF
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CRESCENT CITY APPROVING A MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE POLICY AS REQUIRED BY AB 481
CONTINUING BUSINESS - None
REPORTS AND PRESENTATIONS – None
NEW BUSINESS
13. AB 1944 – Brown Act Modernization
• Recommendation: Hear staff report
• Technical questions from the Council
• Receive public comment
• Further Council discussion
• Direct staff to draft a letter of support to AB 1944 – Local Government: open and public meetings
City Manager Wier stated that this would make it possible for Council Members to utilize teleconferencing should they be unable to attend a meeting due to sickness. However, they would no longer be required to post their location.
The Council was in consensus to send a letter of support with Mayor Greenough being absent.
CITY COUNCIL ITEMS
➢ Legislative Matters – None at this time
➢ City Manager Report and City Council Directives – City Manager Wier reported the following to the Council:
o Budget Workshop- good attendance and discussion by the Council, will be back before the Council on June 20th for adoption.
o The City did the annual Clean Sweep which was a success for the community o There will be a community clean up on June 17th sponsored by Green Diamond near Elk Creek and will also do one at the cemetery
5 | P a g e
6/6/22 COUNCIL MINUTES
➢ Reports, Concerns, Referrals, Council travel and training reports – Mayor Pro Tem Wright: stated that Golden State Risk Management Authority will need to have a City appointment of the representative to the Board; attended First Friday.
Council Member Inscore: supported putting a letter of support on the next agenda for Sutter Coast’s application for Hospice licensing; there was a sold Singing With the Del Norte Stars event and raised $15k for the Humane Society; attended as a Chamber Board Member, the first dinner/comedy event at Lucky Seven.
Council Member Beau Smith: attended the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation Dinner and it was reported that they had the best fundraising they have had at this event.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Council, Mayor Pro Tem Wright adjourned the meeting at 7:09 p.m. to the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Crescent City scheduled for Monday, June 20, 2022 at 6:00 p.m. in the Flynn Center, 981 H Street, Crescent City, CA 95531.
ATTEST:
_____________________________
Robin Patch
City Clerk/Administrative Analyst
Accounts Payable
User:
Printed:
crawlings
6/13/2022 12:33 PM
Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number
Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount ACH PERS1 PERS Health 06/10/2022 0.00 66,901.17
ACH EDDTAX State of California EDD TAX Auto Pay 05/31/2022 0.00 4,241.07 ACH FITTAX FIT Payroll Taxes Auto Pay 05/31/2022 0.00 19,104.66 ACH PERS2 Public Emp Retirement Sys 05/31/2022 0.00 26,341.23 440704 CASTATE CA State Disbursement Unit 05/31/2022 0.00 158.76 440705 WAMUTU Crescent City Employees Association 05/31/2022 0.00 70.00 440706 CCPOLI Crescent City Police Officer's Association 05/31/2022 0.00 450.00 440707 ICMARE Icma Retirement Trust-457 05/31/2022 0.00 2,429.69 440708 PORACRMT PORAC RMT 05/31/2022 0.00 900.00
440709 ATTClets A T & T Corp 06/06/2022 0.00 95.99
440710 UB*05523 A.R. MAYS CONSTRUCTION 06/06/2022 0.00 733.74 440711 AMARANTE Daniel Amarante 06/06/2022 0.00 159.95
440712 AZCO Azco Supply 06/06/2022 0.00 17,536.50
440713 UB*05520 BABICH TRUCKING LLC 06/06/2022 0.00 717.59 440714 BATTSYS Battery Systems, Inc. 06/06/2022 0.00 328.47 440715 BBEST&KR Best Best & Krieger LLP 06/06/2022 0.00 7,733.50 440716 BLUEST Blue Star Gas Associates 06/06/2022 0.00 7,117.43 440717 BOOKCTR BookingCenter.com LLC 06/06/2022 0.00 150.00 440718 UB*05527 CURTIS BORDER 06/06/2022 0.00 41.03
440719 UB*05528 BOUNTIFUL OCEANS INC. 06/06/2022 0.00 250.00 440720 CURRYE Brad Coleman Inc 06/06/2022 0.00 277.09
440721 UB*05533 VALERIA BUTCHER 06/06/2022 0.00 196.33
440722 CCVOLU C C Volunteer Fire Fighters Assoc. 06/06/2022 0.00 10,000.00 440723 CALLEJAR Rose Calleja 06/06/2022 0.00 575.00
440724 UB*05532 EMILY CATER 06/06/2022 0.00 227.16
440725 CCDNCH Cc-Dn Chamber Of Commerce 06/06/2022 0.00 36,000.00 440726 CHARTEC Charter Communications 06/06/2022 0.00 223.69 440727 UB*05522 SEAN CLEVENGER 06/06/2022 0.00 93.70
440728 COUNTRYG Country Garden Nursery LLC 06/06/2022 0.00 6,191.90 440729 DAILYT Country Media Inc. 06/06/2022 0.00 690.38 440730 DNCOUN D N Co Unified School Dst 06/06/2022 0.00 5,230.33 440731 UB*05526 DON DAINES 06/06/2022 0.00 55.02
440732 DNCO Del Norte County 06/06/2022 0.00 118,812.62 440733 MISSVS Virginia Delatorre 06/06/2022 0.00 1,540.00 440734 LULIISH Dezire Inc. 06/06/2022 0.00 5,201.72
440735 DOWNRI Down Range Investments, LLC 06/06/2022 0.00 3,141.15 440736 ENGLUN Englund Marine Supply Co. 06/06/2022 0.00 28.27 440737 FRESWATE Freshwater Environmental Services Inc 06/06/2022 0.00 1,425.00 440738 VERIZO2 Frontier California Inc 06/06/2022 0.00 221.73 440739 NAPA GDMI ENT INC 06/06/2022 0.00 284.15
440740 UB*05531 PAUL & RHONDA GENN 06/06/2022 0.00 139.31 440741 GRAING Grainger 06/06/2022 0.00 387.70
440742 HDFOWLER H. D. Fowler Company, Inc 06/06/2022 0.00 11,887.07 440743 HARPER Harvey M. Harper Company 06/06/2022 0.00 1,689.06 440744 UB*05525 TERESA HEGNES 06/06/2022 0.00 86.87
440745 Home Dep Home Depot Credit Services 06/06/2022 0.00 7,362.48 440746 IDEXX IDEXX Distribution Inc. 06/06/2022 0.00 702.30 AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number (6/13/2022 12:33 PM) Page 1 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount 440747 INDEPE Independent Business Forms, Inc 06/06/2022 0.00 759.40 440748 INDUSTST Industrial Steel & Supply Co., Inc 06/06/2022 0.00 238.58 440749 RECALL Iron Mountain 06/06/2022 0.00 198.21
440750 UB*05534 THOMAS JACOBS 06/06/2022 0.00 40.69
440751 LNCURT L.N. Curtis & Sons 06/06/2022 0.00 1,674.99 440752 UB*05535 LINDA LEE 06/06/2022 0.00 315.65
440753 LESSCH Les Schwab Tire Centers of California Inc 06/06/2022 0.00 20.00 440754 Lexipol Lexipol LLC 06/06/2022 0.00 1,693.20
440755 UB*05510 MICHAEL LILIENTHAL 06/06/2022 0.00 50.50 440756 THRIFT Malcolm Kelly Inc. 06/06/2022 0.00 838.85 440757 UB*05529 DAVID MC PHAIL 06/06/2022 0.00 201.78
440758 MCINTYRE Tammy & Mike McIntyre 06/06/2022 0.00 144.56 440759 UB*05530 KRISTI MERCHANT 06/06/2022 0.00 227.16
440760 MILMEG Megan Miller 06/06/2022 0.00 11.90
440761 MISSIO Mission Linen Supply 06/06/2022 0.00 303.86 440762 MITCHM Mickey Mitchell 06/06/2022 0.00 575.00
440763 MORENOAR Ariana Moreno 06/06/2022 0.00 345.43
440764 MORJON Mor-Jon Inc 06/06/2022 0.00 17.10
440765 NCLAB North Coast Laboratories LTD 06/06/2022 0.00 265.00 440766 OFFICEDE Office Depot 06/06/2022 0.00 131.83
440767 FRANKO Orca Heating & Refrigeration Inc 06/06/2022 0.00 527.00 440768 OREILLY O'Reilly Auto Enterprises LLC 06/06/2022 0.00 261.32 440769 OTIS E Otis Elevator Company Inc 06/06/2022 0.00 323.09 440770 MENDES Pacific Packaging & Supply Co Inc 06/06/2022 0.00 90.64 440771 PATCHROB Robin Patch 06/06/2022 0.00 72.14
440772 CCGLAS Alan Porteous 06/06/2022 0.00 319.95
440773 UB*05521 JUAN RAIGOZA 06/06/2022 0.00 170.08
440774 DNDISP Recology Del Norte 06/06/2022 0.00 2,503.59 440775 RHODA Ashley Rhodes 06/06/2022 0.00 25.00
440776 SMITHMJ Mary Jo Smith 06/06/2022 0.00 282.44
440777 UPLIFT Square Grove LLC. 06/06/2022 0.00 2,476.76 440778 ZCAHEAL3 State of California 06/06/2022 0.00 175,000.00 440779 DNOFFI Debra Stover 06/06/2022 0.00 1,252.54
440780 UB*05524 DONNA THOMPSON 06/06/2022 0.00 151.41
440781 TIDEWA Tidewater Contractors Inc 06/06/2022 0.00 393.60 440782 UNIVAR Univar Solutions USA Inc. 06/06/2022 0.00 6,996.60 440783 CALCARDS US Bank Corporate Pmt Systems 06/06/2022 0.00 4,901.71 440784 VERIZO3 Verizon Wireless Services LLC 06/06/2022 0.00 3,187.92 440785 WIILIAMK Kathy Williams 06/06/2022 0.00 9.08
440786 UB*05519 DENNIS WOLFE 06/06/2022 0.00 84.26
440787 AMFAM American Family Life 06/10/2022 0.00 1,799.45 440788 AMLIF Ameritas Life Ins. Corp. 06/10/2022 0.00 4,945.92 440789 CLEA California Law Enforcement Association 06/10/2022 0.00 220.50 440790 NCHEAL Sydney M Clinton 06/10/2022 0.00 280.00
440791 REDWMO Kevin J Caldwell MD Inc 06/10/2022 0.00 1,220.00 440792 MYERSS Myers-Stevens & Toohey Co Inc 06/10/2022 0.00 94.50 440793 PARS PARS, Public Agency Retirement 06/10/2022 0.00 300.00 440794 CAPLIVE Secure Screening Solutions, Inc 06/10/2022 0.00 88.00 440795 STANDAI Standard Insurance Company 06/10/2022 0.00 2,487.55 440796 VISION Vision Service Plan 06/10/2022 0.00 1,146.75 Report Total (97 checks): 0.00 587,796.30
AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number (6/13/2022 12:33 PM) Page 2 AP
5-28-22 to 6-10-22 Council
User: crawlings
Printed: 6/13/2022 12:31:18 PM
Check Num Check Date Acct 1 Description Amount Selected For V 0 5/31/2022 610-000-2185-00000 PR Batch 00002.05.2022 State Income Tax 2,376.49 False 0 5/31/2022 610-000-2185-00000 PR Batch 00022.05.2022 State Income Tax 1,864.58 False 0 5/31/2022 610-000-2188-00000 PR Batch 00022.05.2022 Medicare Employer Portion 883.91 False 0 5/31/2022 610-000-2188-00000 PR Batch 00022.05.2022 Medicare Employee Portion 883.91 False 0 5/31/2022 610-000-2188-00000 PR Batch 00002.05.2022 Medicare Employer Portion 1,339.19 False 0 5/31/2022 610-000-2188-00000 PR Batch 00002.05.2022 Medicare Employee Portion 1,339.19 False 0 5/31/2022 610-000-2189-00000 PR Batch 00022.05.2022 Federal Income Tax 6,213.39 False 0 5/31/2022 610-000-2189-00000 PR Batch 00002.05.2022 Federal Income Tax 8,445.07 False 0 5/31/2022 610-000-2187-00000 PR Batch 00022.05.2022 EE Contribution 4,553.44 False 0 5/31/2022 610-000-2187-00000 PR Batch 00022.05.2022 ER Contribution 6,407.42 False 0 5/31/2022 610-000-2187-00000 PR Batch 00002.05.2022 EE Contribution 6,524.14 False 0 5/31/2022 610-000-2187-00000 PR Batch 00002.05.2022 Service Credit Purchase 413.20 False 0 5/31/2022 610-000-2187-00000 PR Batch 00002.05.2022 Survivor Benefit 33.48 False 0 6/10/2022 610-000-2173-00000 Jun 22 Premiums 61,089.68 False 0 6/10/2022 630-111-4409-00000 Jun 22 Admin Fee-Retirees 26.77 False 0 5/31/2022 610-000-2187-00000 PR Batch 00002.05.2022 ER Contribution 8,391.72 False 0 5/31/2022 610-000-2187-00000 PR Batch 00022.05.2022 Survivor Benefit 17.83 False 0 6/10/2022 001-111-4125-00000 Jun 22 Admin Fee 152.72 False 0 6/10/2022 630-000-4125-00000 Jun 22 Premiums-Retirees 5,632.00 False 440704 5/31/2022 610-000-2170-00000 PR Batch 00002.05.2022 Child Support-CA 158.76 False 440705 5/31/2022 610-000-2184-00000 PR Batch 00002.05.2022 CCEA Monthly Dues 65.00 False 440705 5/31/2022 610-000-2184-00000 PR Batch 00022.05.2022 CCEA Monthly Dues 5.00 False 440706 5/31/2022 610-000-2181-00000 PR Batch 00022.05.2022 CCPOA Dues 450.00 False 440707 5/31/2022 610-000-2178-00000 Plan #300878 800.00 False 440707 5/31/2022 610-000-2186-00000 Plan #306752 40.73 False 440707 5/31/2022 610-000-2178-00000 Plan #300878 515.00 False 440707 5/31/2022 610-000-2186-00000 Plan #306752 390.05 False 440707 5/31/2022 610-000-2186-00000 Plan #306752 8.54 False 440707 5/31/2022 610-000-2186-00000 Plan #306752 81.80 False 440707 5/31/2022 610-000-2178-00000 Plan #300878 593.57 False 440708 5/31/2022 610-000-2182-00000 PR Batch 00022.05.2022 PORAC RMT 450.00 False 440708 5/31/2022 610-000-2182-00000 PR Batch 00011.05.2022 PORAC RMT 450.00 False 440709 6/6/2022 001-240-4230-00000 Clets Line Maintenance - Apr 22 95.99 False 440710 6/6/2022 419-000-2110-00000 Refund Check 110545-000, HYDRANT METER- E- SOUTH OF TOWN 733.74 False 440711 6/6/2022 413-353-4320-04320 Boot Reimbursement 159.95 False 440712 6/6/2022 001-364-4350-10023 60 streetlights 17,536.50 False 440713 6/6/2022 419-000-2110-00000 Refund Check 109997-001, HYDRANT METER- C- STANDARD VENEER 717.59 False 440714 6/6/2022 508-508-4390-00000 batteries-core return -66.00 False 440714 6/6/2022 508-508-4390-00000 batteries 394.47 False 440715 6/6/2022 413-130-4410-00000 Legal Services: River Watch 7,733.50 False 440716 6/6/2022 001-480-4220-2020s Propane 4/14-5/13/22 6,589.31 False 440716 6/6/2022 001-471-4220-00000 Propane 4/14-5/13/22 33.89 False 440716 6/6/2022 001-471-4220-00000 Propane - CREDIT -5.00 False 440716 6/6/2022 001-230-4220-00000 fuel 232.41 False
440716 6/6/2022 001-240-4220-00000 fuel - 4/14-5/13/22 16.72 False AP - 5-28-22 to 6-10-22 Council (6/13/2022) Page 1 of 7 Check Num Check Date Acct 1 Description Amount Selected For V 440716 6/6/2022 001-230-4220-00000 fuel 250.10 False
440717 6/6/2022 412-100-4409-00000 RV Park Reservation services 150.00 False 440718 6/6/2022 419-000-2110-00000 Refund Check 110509-000, 1230 LINNETT CT 41.03 False 440719 6/6/2022 419-000-2110-00000 Refund Check 108251-000, 1050 SUNSET CIRCLE 250.00 False 440720 6/6/2022 001-470-4390-00000 brush guard, brush attachment 114.73 False 440720 6/6/2022 412-100-4390-00000 Stihl BG50 162.36 False 440721 6/6/2022 419-000-2110-00000 Refund Check 104989-002, 1460 GARY ST 196.33 False 440722 6/6/2022 001-230-4670-00000 Annual contributions - 2nd installment 10,000.00 False 440723 6/6/2022 001-000-2230-00000 CC rental deposit refund: 4/30-5/1/22 575.00 False 440724 6/6/2022 419-000-2110-00000 Refund Check 105122-003, 586 MURPHY AVE 227.16 False 440725 6/6/2022 001-112-4431-00000 Chamber of Commerce/Visitor's Bureau annul Cint: 3rd Qtr FY 22 18,000.00 False 440725 6/6/2022 001-112-4431-00000 Chamber of Commerce/Visitor's Bureau annual cont: 4th Qtr FY 22 18,000.00 False 440726 6/6/2022 001-230-4230-00000 Cable & Internet Service- 4/20-5/19/22 118.71 False 440726 6/6/2022 413-352-4230-00000 broadband for security 5/8-6/7/22 104.98 False 440727 6/6/2022 419-000-2110-00000 Refund Check 109381-000, 2844 PRINCE RD 93.70 False 440728 6/6/2022 001-470-4390-00000 40x18" Sun Basket with frame credit 6,191.90 False 440729 6/6/2022 001-120-4407-00000 Finance Technician Ad 8.90 False 440729 6/6/2022 413-120-4407-00000 Finance Technician Ad 8.90 False 440729 6/6/2022 419-120-4407-00000 Finance Technician Ad 8.90 False 440729 6/6/2022 001-120-4407-00000 Finance Technician Ad 8.90 False 440729 6/6/2022 001-240-4407-00000 Police Recruit Ad 156.00 False 440729 6/6/2022 419-120-4407-00000 Fiannce Technician Ad 8.90 False 440729 6/6/2022 001-113-4430-00000 Summary of Ordinance #828 100.13 False 440729 6/6/2022 001-113-4430-00000 Summary of Ordinance #830 106.80 False 440729 6/6/2022 001-113-4430-00000 Summary of Ordinance #829 66.75 False 440729 6/6/2022 001-120-4407-00000 Fiannce Technician Ad 8.90 False 440729 6/6/2022 413-120-4407-00000 Fiannce Technician Ad 8.90 False 440729 6/6/2022 413-120-4407-00000 Finance Technician Ad 8.90 False 440729 6/6/2022 419-120-4407-00000 Finance Technician Ad 8.90 False 440729 6/6/2022 001-240-4407-00000 Police Officer (Lateral) Ad 180.60 False 440730 6/6/2022 001-230-4330-00000 Fuel for fire apparatus-Apr 22 2,892.50 False 440730 6/6/2022 001-230-4330-00000 Fuel for fire apparatus- Mar 22 2,337.83 False 440731 6/6/2022 419-000-2110-00000 Refund Check 108513-000, 100 GRACE LN 55.02 False 440732 6/6/2022 001-000-3110-00000 Return overpayment to County (secured tax calculated incorrectly 118,812.62 False 440733 6/6/2022 001-470-4450-00000 Janitorial services for public restrooms-5/15-5/28/22 980.00 False 440733 6/6/2022 412-100-4450-00000 Janitorial services for public restrooms-5/15-5/28/22 560.00 False 440734 6/6/2022 001-470-4430-00000 Marketing Servicecs through June 2022 - 10/8/21-4/8/22 500.01 False 440734 6/6/2022 412-100-4430-00000 Marketing Servicecs through June 2022 - 10/8/21-4/8/22 1,272.74 False 440734 6/6/2022 001-480-4430-00000 Marketing Servicecs through June 2022 - 10/8/21-4/8/22 500.00 False 440734 6/6/2022 412-100-4430-00000 Marketing Servicecs through June 2022 - 4/9-5/12/22 1,640.23 False 440734 6/6/2022 001-470-4430-00000 Marketing Servicecs through June 2022 - 4/9-5/12/22 644.37 False 440734 6/6/2022 001-480-4430-00000 Marketing Servicecs through June 2022 - 4/9-5/12/22 644.37 False 440735 6/6/2022 001-240-4320-00000 Uniforms - Griffin 416.97 False 440735 6/6/2022 001-240-4320-00000 Uniforms - Sanders 360.68 False 440735 6/6/2022 001-240-4320-00000 Uniforms - Lo 360.68 False 440735 6/6/2022 001-240-4320-00000 Uniforms - Wilson 360.68 False 440735 6/6/2022 001-240-4320-00000 Uniforms - Miller 268.68 False 440735 6/6/2022 001-240-4320-00000 Uniforms - Balch 360.68 False 440735 6/6/2022 001-240-4320-00000 Uniforms - Pearson 360.68 False 440735 6/6/2022 001-240-4320-00000 Uniforms - Valero 349.86 False 440735 6/6/2022 001-240-4320-00000 Uniforms - Lopez 302.24 False 440736 6/6/2022 001-470-4390-00000 U bolt for jetty sign 28.27 False 440737 6/6/2022 413-352-4409-00000 Regulatory compliance 1,425.00 False 440738 6/6/2022 419-371-4230-00000 707-465-3386 Water Scada Phone 5/14-6/13/22 86.43 False 440738 6/6/2022 001-240-4230-00000 Radio to Sherriff - 5/13-6/12/22 31.11 False AP - 5-28-22 to 6-10-22 Council (6/13/2022) Page 2 of 7 Check Num Check Date Acct 1 Description Amount Selected For V 440738 6/6/2022 419-371-4230-00000 Water System Phone Bill 707-1006 - 5/13-6/12/22 29.94 False 440738 6/6/2022 419-371-4230-00000 Water System Phone 464-2826 -05/13-06/12/2022 74.25 False 440739 6/6/2022 508-508-4390-00000 camshaft & crankshaft 96.79 False 440739 6/6/2022 508-508-4390-00000 wheel seal 36.14 False 440739 6/6/2022 508-508-4390-00000 Ignition coil 68.20 False 440739 6/6/2022 001-240-4391-00000 oil filter #57 10.03 False 440739 6/6/2022 508-508-4390-00000 plug wire set 72.99 False 440740 6/6/2022 419-000-2110-00000 Refund Check 105060-000, 407 GLENN ST 139.31 False 440741 6/6/2022 508-508-4390-00000 Absorbant Pads 165.26 False 440741 6/6/2022 001-470-4390-00000 pet waste bags for Dog Park 222.44 False 440742 6/6/2022 419-371-4390-00000 Water main parts and fittings 11,887.07 False 440743 6/6/2022 508-508-4390-00000 gaskets, seals, fuel regulator #8 803.27 False 440743 6/6/2022 508-508-4390-00000 AC pretensioner #45 392.18 False 440743 6/6/2022 508-508-4390-00000 tube assembly #4 472.18 False 440743 6/6/2022 508-508-4390-00000 lock assembly #10 21.43 False 440744 6/6/2022 419-000-2110-00000 Refund Check 005885-002, 1111 SUNRISE AVE 86.87 False 440745 6/6/2022 508-508-4390-00000 window & door tape 40.01 False 440745 6/6/2022 508-508-4390-00000 window & door tape 86.06 False 440745 6/6/2022 506-506-4390-00000 scour pads/water/grabber/grease/simple green 188.57 False 440745 6/6/2022 001-240-4390-00000 latex brushes/microfiber towels 44.86 False 440745 6/6/2022 001-480-4340-00000 muratic acid 51.79 False 440745 6/6/2022 001-470-4390-00000 ear muff 29.20 False 440745 6/6/2022 508-508-4390-00000 hole saw 25.92 False 440745 6/6/2022 412-100-4390-00000 hex nuts/bolts/washer/hammer 50.12 False 440745 6/6/2022 508-508-4390-00000 hole saw 38.87 False 440745 6/6/2022 001-230-4390-00000 mechanical lubricants/wall plate 12.69 False 440745 6/6/2022 001-480-4390-00000 conduit 22.02 False
440745 6/6/2022 001-470-4390-00000 construction screws 10.79 False 440745 6/6/2022 001-471-4390-00000 aluminum rail end/tension band 13.63 False 440745 6/6/2022 413-353-4390-00000 gas can/oil/water 32.49 False 440745 6/6/2022 506-506-4390-00000 miter saw/diablo saw 753.17 False 440745 6/6/2022 412-100-4390-00000 toilpaint brush/sharpie markers 23.01 False 440745 6/6/2022 412-100-4390-00000 toilet seat 29.21 False 440745 6/6/2022 419-371-4390-00000 utility blade 10.79 False 440745 6/6/2022 506-506-4390-00000 phone line cord/cable 258.86 False 440745 6/6/2022 413-353-4390-00000 rat trap/mouse trap/ant bait 22.06 False 440745 6/6/2022 001-240-4390-00000 tarp 52.37 False
440745 6/6/2022 001-240-4390-00000 tarp-RETURN -85.82 False 440745 6/6/2022 413-353-4390-00000 diablo blade/search light/metel cutter 59.70 False 440745 6/6/2022 506-506-4390-00000 mud mixer/bit set 243.53 False 440745 6/6/2022 506-506-4390-00000 chisel/marker 9.15 False 440745 6/6/2022 001-240-4390-00000 drywall sand screen/pole sander 36.21 False 440745 6/6/2022 001-240-4390-00000 tarp 85.82 False
440745 6/6/2022 506-506-4390-00000 boxes/conduit 30.13 False 440745 6/6/2022 001-240-4390-00000 drywall/lumber stud/drywall screws/jc box/taping knives/tape 63.25 False 440745 6/6/2022 506-506-4390-00000 coupling/plumber tool/cordmates 83.86 False 440745 6/6/2022 506-506-4390-00000 shears 75.73 False
440745 6/6/2022 419-371-4390-00000 40 master locks 659.25 False 440745 6/6/2022 001-240-4390-00000 utility blades 29.67 False 440745 6/6/2022 412-100-4390-00000 hand saw/screws/fileset/lumber/sawhorse 90.99 False 440745 6/6/2022 508-508-4390-00000 couplers 14.57 False 440745 6/6/2022 419-371-4390-00000 tape measure/gloves 23.75 False 440745 6/6/2022 001-240-4390-00000 flooring 1,379.84 False 440745 6/6/2022 413-353-4390-00000 disinfectant/water 11.64 False 440745 6/6/2022 001-470-4390-00000 canvas gloves/water 26.57 False AP - 5-28-22 to 6-10-22 Council (6/13/2022) Page 3 of 7 Check Num Check Date Acct 1 Description Amount Selected For V 440745 6/6/2022 001-470-4390-00000 loppers/leaf rakes 92.99 False 440745 6/6/2022 001-471-4390-00000 vinegar/cleaner/block/lighters 91.14 False 440745 6/6/2022 508-508-4390-00000 spray paint 11.86 False 440745 6/6/2022 508-508-4390-00000 tape 8.09 False
440745 6/6/2022 001-470-4390-00000 smart control gas can 81.09 False 440745 6/6/2022 412-100-4390-00000 pegboard/hooks 58.10 False 440745 6/6/2022 001-364-4390-10025 diablo blade/search light/metel cutter 59.69 False 440745 6/6/2022 001-240-4391-00000 utility floor mat 7.31 False 440745 6/6/2022 001-240-4390-00000 drywall saw/drywall rasp 19.44 False 440745 6/6/2022 001-240-4391-00000 self stick door for #56 10.26 False 440745 6/6/2022 419-371-4390-00000 tape measure/utility knife/pliers/hammer/tool bag 193.88 False 440745 6/6/2022 419-371-4390-00000 post cap/tension band/fence line 34.94 False 440745 6/6/2022 412-100-4390-00000 Picnic Tables/paint 1,999.66 False 440745 6/6/2022 419-371-4390-00000 diablo blade/search light/metel cutter 59.70 False 440746 6/6/2022 413-351-4390-00000 Microbiology supplies 702.30 False 440748 6/6/2022 508-508-4390-00000 steel tube/angle iron 238.58 False 440749 6/6/2022 001-113-4450-00000 Document Shredding service for 3/23-4/26/22 198.21 False 440750 6/6/2022 419-000-2110-00000 Refund Check 110322-000, 1010 HUMBOLDT ST 40.69 False 440751 6/6/2022 001-230-4450-00000 Mako compressor servicing 1,674.99 False 440752 6/6/2022 419-000-2110-00000 Refund Check 110771-000, 885 MURPHY AVE 315.65 False 440753 6/6/2022 508-508-4390-00000 flat tire repair 20.00 False 440754 6/6/2022 001-240-4530-00000 Online training-PoliceOne Academy 1,693.20 False 440755 6/6/2022 419-000-2110-00000 Refund Check 109790-000, 1768 GAINARD ST 50.50 False 440756 6/6/2022 419-371-4390-00000 Couplings 305.14 False 440756 6/6/2022 419-371-4390-00000 PVC pipe 104.86 False 440756 6/6/2022 419-371-4390-00000 couplings 237.65 False 440756 6/6/2022 419-371-4390-00000 gate valves 58.05 False 440756 6/6/2022 412-100-4390-00000 wall hung toilet 133.15 False 440757 6/6/2022 419-000-2110-00000 Refund Check 007016-003, 140 BREAKWATER DR 201.78 False 440758 6/6/2022 001-000-3221-00000 Refund RV Space Rent TOT for 5/22-5/26/22 13.12 False 440758 6/6/2022 412-100-3825-00000 Refund RV Space Rent for 5/22-5/26/22 131.44 False 440759 6/6/2022 419-000-2110-00000 Refund Check 109119-000, 1134 SEVILLE AVE 227.16 False 440761 6/6/2022 001-120-4370-00000 Laundry service mats City Hall 17.03 False 440761 6/6/2022 508-508-4320-00000 Laundry service/uniforms 22.75 False 440761 6/6/2022 413-351-4320-00000 Laundry service/uniforms 14.32 False 440761 6/6/2022 413-351-4320-00000 Laundry service/uniforms 20.27 False 440761 6/6/2022 413-353-4320-00000 Laundry service/uniforms 29.09 False 440761 6/6/2022 001-120-4370-00000 Laundry service mats City Hall 17.03 False 440761 6/6/2022 001-480-4390-2020S Pool mats 23.64 False 440761 6/6/2022 413-351-4320-00000 Laundry service/uniforms 14.32 False 440761 6/6/2022 508-508-4320-00000 Laundry service/uniforms 22.75 False 440761 6/6/2022 413-353-4320-00000 Laundry service/uniforms 29.09 False 440761 6/6/2022 001-480-4320-00000 Pool Mats 93.57 False 440762 6/6/2022 001-000-2230-00000 CC Deposit Refund 05/13-5/15/2022 575.00 False 440763 6/6/2022 001-000-2230-00000 CC rental deposit refund: 4/23-4/24/22 575.00 False 440763 6/6/2022 001-471-4390-00000 CC rental deposit refund: 4/23-4/24/22( Credit for table damages -229.57 False 440764 6/6/2022 508-508-4390-00000 welding rod 17.10 False 440765 6/6/2022 419-371-4470-00000 External regulatory lab tests for water utilities, lead and copp 100.00 False 440765 6/6/2022 413-352-4470-00000 external regulatory lab tests for sewer 165.00 False 440766 6/6/2022 001-120-4310-00000 PR Envelopes 43.95 False 440766 6/6/2022 419-120-4310-00000 PR Envelopes 43.94 False 440766 6/6/2022 413-120-4310-00000 PR Envelopes 43.94 False 440767 6/6/2022 506-506-4390-00000 Headstart Furnace Service 527.00 False 440768 6/6/2022 508-508-4390-00000 brake rotor 178.37 False 440768 6/6/2022 508-508-4390-00000 A/C ignition #17 18.01 False AP - 5-28-22 to 6-10-22 Council (6/13/2022) Page 4 of 7 Check Num Check Date Acct 1 Description Amount Selected For V 440768 6/6/2022 508-508-4390-00000 Axle seal #10 27.11 False 440768 6/6/2022 508-508-4390-00000 shift tube #10 37.83 False 440769 6/6/2022 001-471-4450-00000 Elevator maintenance - 6/1-6/30/22 323.09 False 440770 6/6/2022 001-471-4370-00000 janitorial supplies 3.63 False 440770 6/6/2022 001-350-4370-00000 janitorial supplies 10.33 False 440770 6/6/2022 420-115-4370-00000 janitorial supplies 0.36 False 440770 6/6/2022 413-352-4370-00000 janitorial supplies 3.63 False 440770 6/6/2022 001-114-4370-00000 janitorial supplies 0.36 False 440770 6/6/2022 506-506-4370-00000 janitorial supplies 3.63 False 440770 6/6/2022 412-100-4370-00000 janitorial supplies 3.63 False 440770 6/6/2022 001-120-4370-00000 janitorial supplies 1.45 False 440770 6/6/2022 001-111-4370-00000 janitorial supplies 0.36 False 440770 6/6/2022 419-120-4370-00000 janitorial supplies 0.36 False 440770 6/6/2022 001-240-4370-00000 janitorial supplies 3.63 False 440770 6/6/2022 508-508-4370-00000 janitorial supplies 4.53 False 440770 6/6/2022 001-470-4370-00000 janitorial supplies 40.79 False 440770 6/6/2022 001-313-4370-00000 janitorial supplies 0.36 False 440770 6/6/2022 001-251-4370-00000 janitorial supplies 0.18 False 440770 6/6/2022 001-480-4370-00000 janitorial supplies 9.06 False 440770 6/6/2022 001-113-4370-00000 janitorial supplies 0.36 False 440770 6/6/2022 413-120-4370-00000 janitorial supplies 0.36 False 440771 6/6/2022 001-110-4400-00000 Food for Budget Workshop 72.14 False 440772 6/6/2022 001-471-4390-00000 service call 170.00 False 440772 6/6/2022 001-480-4390-00000 door handle 149.95 False 440773 6/6/2022 419-000-2110-00000 Refund Check 110984-000, 525 LEIF CIRCLE 170.08 False 440774 6/6/2022 412-100-4225-00000 Disposal Services for 5/1-5/31/22 2,503.59 False 440775 6/6/2022 001-480-3716-00000 Rental refund due to pool closure 25.00 False 440776 6/6/2022 001-114-4390-00000 HSI Skill Guides/Digital Cert Cards 282.44 False 440777 6/6/2022 419-120-4311-00000 L-shaped standing desk 80x78x30 825.58 False 440777 6/6/2022 001-120-4311-00000 L-shaped standing desk 80x78x30 825.59 False 440777 6/6/2022 413-120-4311-00000 L-shaped standing desk 80x78x30 825.59 False 440778 6/6/2022 419-000-2770-00000 FY 21/22 Safe Drinking Water Loan Payment 175,000.00 False 440779 6/6/2022 001-120-4310-00000 Paper for Business License renewals 12.97 False 440779 6/6/2022 419-120-4310-00000 Toner Cartridge 100.00 False 440779 6/6/2022 001-120-4310-00000 Toner Cartridge 99.99 False 440779 6/6/2022 001-112-4311-00000 office chair 354.42 False 440779 6/6/2022 413-120-4310-00000 Toner Cartridge 100.00 False 440779 6/6/2022 412-100-4310-00000 carrying case 84.35 False 440779 6/6/2022 001-480-4390-2020S Thermal Paper 20.97 False 440779 6/6/2022 001-350-4310-00000 office supplies for Front St Presentation 40.59 False 440779 6/6/2022 001-480-4390-2020S Stapler 22.03 False
440779 6/6/2022 001-480-4390-2020S Toner Cartridge 150.10 False 440779 6/6/2022 001-480-4390-2020S Paper & tape 67.73 False 440779 6/6/2022 001-240-4310-00000 office supplies 8.79 False 440779 6/6/2022 001-240-4310-00000 office supplies 35.77 False 440779 6/6/2022 001-113-4310-00000 certificate holder 41.22 False 440779 6/6/2022 001-480-4390-2020S paper 48.25 False
440779 6/6/2022 001-240-4310-00000 office supplies 45.59 False 440779 6/6/2022 001-111-4310-00000 office supplies 7.87 False 440780 6/6/2022 419-000-2110-00000 Refund Check 106264-000, 2542 QUINLAN AVE 151.41 False 440781 6/6/2022 001-364-4390-10025 Asphalt to patch various roads 118.08 False 440781 6/6/2022 413-353-4390-00000 Asphalt to patch various roads 39.42 False 440781 6/6/2022 419-371-4390-00000 Asphalt to patch various roads 236.10 False 440782 6/6/2022 413-000-1202-00000 Sodium Hypochlorite 5,359.97 False 440782 6/6/2022 001-480-4340-00000 Sodium Hypochlorite 163.66 False AP - 5-28-22 to 6-10-22 Council (6/13/2022) Page 5 of 7 Check Num Check Date Acct 1 Description Amount Selected For V 440782 6/6/2022 419-371-4340-00000 Sodium Hypochlorite 1,472.97 False 440783 6/6/2022 413-353-4390-00000 3M CREDIT: respirator clearance 29.00 False 440783 6/6/2022 413-351-4550-00000 CALIFORNIA WATER ENVIRON: LA-2 renewal for Fuoco 96.00 False 440783 6/6/2022 506-506-4390-00000 AMAZON: heater for Econ Dev/Rec director's office 32.46 False 440783 6/6/2022 412-100-4390-00000 SEARSPARTS: washer door strike 40.77 False 440783 6/6/2022 413-120-4310-00000 AMAZON: flags 2.00 False 440783 6/6/2022 001-120-4310-00000 AMAZON: flags 1.99 False 440783 6/6/2022 419-120-4310-00000 AMAZON: office supplies 39.41 False 440783 6/6/2022 412-100-4390-00000 SEARSPARTS: dryer heating element 181.68 False 440783 6/6/2022 001-350-4310-00000 AMAZON: plotter paper 33.54 False 440783 6/6/2022 419-371-4530-00000 AMERICAN WATER COLLEGE: course for D Lovdahl 299.99 False 440783 6/6/2022 001-230-4390-00000 WALMART: flash drives 21.63 False 440783 6/6/2022 419-371-4310-00000 AMAZON: batteries for supply 13.45 False 440783 6/6/2022 420-115-4310-00000 AMAZON: plotter paper 36.80 False 440783 6/6/2022 419-371-4310-00000 AMAZON: plotter paper 36.81 False 440783 6/6/2022 001-114-4390-00000 HARBOR FREIGHT: 1st Aid supplies 54.00 False 440783 6/6/2022 001-112-4390-00000 supplies for community meeting 12.57 False 440783 6/6/2022 001-230-4370-00000 THE HOME DEPOT: janitorial supplies 20.43 False 440783 6/6/2022 419-120-4310-00000 AMAZON: flags 2.00 False 440783 6/6/2022 413-351-4310-00000 AMAZON: Cretificate paper 14.06 False 440783 6/6/2022 001-230-4395-00000 AMAZON: Bugle Pin for New Chief 12.94 False 440783 6/6/2022 001-114-4390-00000 AMAZON: 1st Aid supplies 95.81 False 440783 6/6/2022 001-350-4310-00000 AMAZON: batteries for supply 13.45 False 440783 6/6/2022 413-120-4310-00000 AMAZON: office supplies 39.41 False 440783 6/6/2022 001-230-4395-00000 FIREFIGHTERS' SAFEETY INC: Nomex parts for new chief 304.13 False 440783 6/6/2022 508-508-4390-00000 SIMPLE TIRE: tractor tines 884.56 False 440783 6/6/2022 419-371-4310-00000 AMAZON: plotter paper 33.54 False 440783 6/6/2022 001-350-4310-00000 AMAZON: plotter paper 36.81 False 440783 6/6/2022 001-230-4395-00000 GALLS: New Chief uniforms 401.09 False 440783 6/6/2022 413-353-4310-00000 AMAZON: batteries for supply closet 5.14 False 440783 6/6/2022 412-100-4230-00000 DISH: cable service 4/25-5/24/22 773.58 False 440783 6/6/2022 419-371-4530-00000 AMERICAN WATER COLLEGE: course for E Eiler 299.99 False 440783 6/6/2022 412-100-4390-00000 COAST TO COAST BREAKER: circuit breakers 461.76 False 440783 6/6/2022 420-115-4310-00000 AMAZON: plotter paper 33.54 False 440783 6/6/2022 001-230-4390-00000 RV PARTS COUNTRY: Lite Kit for rig -458.37 False 440783 6/6/2022 001-120-4310-00000 AMAZON: office supplies 39.40 False 440783 6/6/2022 001-230-4530-00000 THE MAIL ROOM: return drysuits for swiftwater training 29.97 False 440783 6/6/2022 001-480-4390-00000 AMAZON: lanyards w/whistles 32.46 False 440783 6/6/2022 001-350-4310-00000 AMAZON: batteries for supply closet 5.13 False 440783 6/6/2022 413-351-4390-00000 LABSTRONG: Heating Element for distillation unit 883.64 False 440783 6/6/2022 419-371-4310-00000 AMAZON: batteries for supply closet 5.14 False 440784 6/6/2022 413-130-4230-00000 Services for 4/13-5/12/22 10.13 False 440784 6/6/2022 001-130-4230-00000 Services for 4/13-5/12/22 20.25 False 440784 6/6/2022 001-471-4230-00000 Services for 4/13-5/12/22 4.55 False 440784 6/6/2022 001-111-4230-00000 Services for 4/13-5/12/22 15.15 False 440784 6/6/2022 001-112-4230-00000 Services for 4/13-5/12/22 30.24 False 440784 6/6/2022 001-350-4230-00000 Services for 4/13-5/12/22 121.07 False 440784 6/6/2022 419-111-4230-00000 Services for 4/13-5/12/22 15.20 False 440784 6/6/2022 413-120-4230-00000 Services for 4/13-5/12/22 76.92 False 440784 6/6/2022 001-230-4230-00000 Services for 4/13-5/12/22 243.92 False 440784 6/6/2022 419-371-4230-00000 Services for 4/13-5/12/22 231.70 False 440784 6/6/2022 001-250-4230-00000 Services for 4/13-5/12/22 20.25 False 440784 6/6/2022 001-470-4230-00000 Services for 4/13-5/12/22 19.90 False 440784 6/6/2022 001-480-4230-00000 Services for 4/13-5/12/22 109.68 False 440784 6/6/2022 001-120-4230-00000 Services for 4/13-5/12/22 48.57 False AP - 5-28-22 to 6-10-22 Council (6/13/2022) Page 6 of 7 Check Num Check Date Acct 1 Description Amount Selected For V 440784 6/6/2022 001-114-4230-00000 Services for 4/13-5/12/22 40.50 False 440784 6/6/2022 420-115-4230-00000 Services for 4/13-5/12/22 81.00 False 440784 6/6/2022 413-111-4230-00000 Services for 4/13-5/12/22 15.15 False 440784 6/6/2022 413-351-4230-00000 Services for 4/13-5/12/22 214.47 False 440784 6/6/2022 412-100-4230-00000 Services for 4/13-5/12/22 104.38 False 440784 6/6/2022 413-353-4230-00000 Services for 4/13-5/12/22 149.00 False 440784 6/6/2022 001-110-4230-00000 Services for 4/13-5/12/22 207.50 False 440784 6/6/2022 508-508-4230-00000 Services for 4/13-5/12/22 60.56 False 440784 6/6/2022 413-112-4230-0ARPAServices for 4/13-5/12/22 10.81 False 440784 6/6/2022 001-240-4230-00000 Services for 4/13-5/12/22 445.67 False 440784 6/6/2022 413-352-4230-00000 Services for 4/13-5/12/22 272.04 False 440784 6/6/2022 001-364-4230-00000 Services for 4/13-5/12/22 58.61 False 440784 6/6/2022 419-112-4230-0ARPAServices for 4/13-5/12/22 10.82 False 440784 6/6/2022 001-113-4230-00000 Services for 4/13-5/12/22 40.50 False 440784 6/6/2022 419-120-4230-00000 Services for 4/13-5/12/22 149.89 False 440784 6/6/2022 419-130-4230-00000 Services for 4/13-5/12/22 10.12 False 440784 6/6/2022 506-506-4230-00000 Services for 4/13-5/12/22 35.24 False 440785 6/6/2022 412-100-4390-00000 supplies 9.08 False
440786 6/6/2022 419-000-2110-00000 Refund Check 109841-000, 420 CAMP 5 LN 84.26 False 440787 6/10/2022 610-000-2174-00000 Jun 22 Premiums 1,799.45 False 440788 6/10/2022 610-000-2177-00000 Jun 22 Premiums 4,945.92 False 440789 6/10/2022 610-000-2179-00000 Jun 22 Premiums 220.50 False 440790 6/10/2022 001-230-4407-00000 Pre-employment screening 80.00 False 440790 6/10/2022 001-470-4407-00000 Pre-employment screening 120.00 False 440790 6/10/2022 001-480-4407-00000 Pre-employment screening 80.00 False 440791 6/10/2022 001-470-4407-00000 Pre-employment exams 230.00 False 440791 6/10/2022 001-240-4407-00000 Fire Exams 990.00 False 440792 6/10/2022 001-240-4125-00000 Jun 22 Premiums 94.50 False 440793 6/10/2022 630-111-4409-00000 Mar 22 Admin Fees 300.00 False 440794 6/10/2022 001-470-4407-00000 fingerprinting 44.00 False 440794 6/10/2022 001-240-4411-00000 fingerprinting-Hensel 22.00 False 440794 6/10/2022 001-240-4407-00000 fingerprinting 22.00 False 440795 6/10/2022 610-000-2179-00000 Jun 22 Premiums 2,487.55 False 440796 6/10/2022 610-000-2175-00000 Jun 22 Premiums 1,146.75 False 586,695.34
AP - 5-28-22 to 6-10-22 Council (6/13/2022) Page 7 of 7 AP
5-28-22 to 6-10-22 Housing
User: crawlings
Printed: 6/13/2022 12:32:21 PM
Check Date Check Number Description Amount Selected For Void 6/6/2022 440770 janitorial supplies 3.63 False
6/6/2022 440760 GFI tester for inpections 11.90 False
6/6/2022 440779 office supplies 11.90 False
6/6/2022 440784 Services for 4/13-5/12/22 314.13 False
6/6/2022 440747 Forms and printing 759.40 False
1,100.96
AP - 5-28-22 to 6-10-22 Housing (6/13/2022) Page 1 of 1 June 4, 2022
June 10, 2022
110666-110674
Regular Pay Overtime Gross Pay # Empl Notes
Dept #110
City Council 2,809.84 2,809.84 5
Dept #111
Admin/City Manager 13,353.05 790.98 14,144.03 4
Dept #112
Comm Dev/Recreation 6,023.31 261.39 6,284.70 2
Dept #114
Human Resources 4,318.70 4,318.70 1
Dept #120
Finance/Utility Billing 12,901.39 12,901.39 5
Dept #130
City Attorney 4,544.77 4,544.77 1
Dept #230
Fire Department 11,086.00 11,086.00 3
Dept #240
Police Department 30,253.16 1,973.66 32,226.82 10
Dept #313
Planning - 1 Part-time
Dept #350
Public Works-All Depts 50,479.32 1,700.02 52,179.34 19 + 1 part-time Dept #450
Recreation & Events 23.39 2,304.51 1 + 1 Part-time
Dept #480
Swimming Pool Fund 8,675.70 237.23 8,912.93 2 + 15 Part-time Dept #490
Housing Authority 9,514.91 9,514.91 4
TOTALS 153,960.15 4,986.67 161,227.94 60 + 18 Part-time The payroll summarized above is listed where assigned. The actual costs of each employee are allocated each pay period to the department and/or fund where the actual work was performed.
CHECK NUMBERS
CITY OF CRESCENT CITY PAYROLL END DATE
BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL REPORT PAYROLL PAID DATE
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
TO: MAYOR GREENOUGH AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ERIC WIER, CITY MANAGER
BY: JON OLSON, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
ANDREW LEIGHTON, ENGINEERING PROJECT MANAGER
DATE: JUNE 20, 2022
SUBJECT: COWI CONTRACT TIME EXTENSION
______________________________________________________________________
RECOMMENDATION
• Approve and authorize the City Manager to sign Task Order 2.0 with COWI to extend the term of the contract from September 30, 2020 to June 30, 2023.
BACKGROUND
The December 2016 storms caused significant erosion along Pebble Beach Drive from Preston Island to Sixth Street. This is evidenced by the visible road cracks indicating loss of road foundation and loss of bluff. Initial efforts to secure Federal funding through the emergency relief program for bank stabilization were taken. These efforts included filling out and receiving approval of a Damage Assessment Form (DAF) and contracting SHN to provide a geotechnical report of the affected area. Staff met with the California Coastal Commission (CCC), spoke with geotechnical design and construction firms and developed a project cost estimate of approximately $3.8 million in 2018. Staff received approval for the project cost estimate on November 1, 2018 from Caltrans (the implementing Agency) which was then followed by the authorization to proceed with Preliminary Engineering (PE) work. Emergency relief funding administered through Federal Highways Administration (FHWA) and CalOES was approved.
The City of Crescent City signed a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) on May 11, 2020, with COWI a consulting engineering firm, to proceed with relevant environmental, archaeological, and geotechnical studies, design of an engineering solution to the failure, and development of permit applications based on input from the various agencies. The term of the agreement was set to end September 30, 2020.
The City and COWI presented a progress report to CCC on February 25, 2021. The information and data being requested from Coastal Staff was significantly increased over the original requests. The first application of the Coastal Development Permit was made COWI Contract Time Extension
June 20, 2022
2 to CCC on August 11, 2021. The CCC responded on October 1, 2021 with a request for 11 additional requirements/clarifications. Additional information was submitted to CCC on February 22, 2022. CCC requested 9 additional clarifications on March 25, 2022. The City and COWI are presently working on a response.
ITEM ANALYSIS
The many requests from Coastal Commission staff caused a 2-year delay while COWI and the City generated 30% plans, and many reports (geotechnical, biological, environmental and social). The requirements were delayed a further 6 months while questions and clarifications were researched and then submitted to Coastal staff. The third response is close to submission but has taken 3 months to develop. There is no guarantee that Coastal staff will approve our third submission without additional questions. Based upon this uncertainty, we request extending the original contract term from September 30, 2020 to June 30, 2023 anticipating that COWI will be able to gain permits and complete the Preliminary Engineering (PE) phase of the Pebble Beach Bank Stabilization project within this new time frame.
FISCAL ANALYSIS
There is no change in the financial portion of the COWI professional services agreement at this time due to a delay in the latest DAF (revision KCB-CRC-001-3). It is anticipated that City staff will accumulate a small number of billable hours against the federally funded project over the next year.
STRATEGIC PLAN ASSESSMENT
GOAL 1: SUPPORT QUALITY SERVICES, COMMUNITY SAFETY, AND HEALTH TO
ENHANCE THE QUALITY OF LIFE AND EXPERIENCE OF OUR RESIDENTS AND
VISITORS
D. Provide and maintain an efficient, adequate infrastructure to provide for both current and future community needs
ATTACHMENTS
1. Task Order 2.0 with COWI
Task Order 2.0
Task Order to Master Agreement
CLIENT: City of Crescent City
MASTER AGREEMENT DATE: 11 May 2020
JOB NUMBER: Caltrans Project # ER-32D0(013)
SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED:
1. Client shall provide:
A. Information requested by Consultant and all other items required in the Master Agreement
2. Consultant shall perform the following services:
A. All items identified in the full Scope of Work called out in the Master Agreement for professional services dated May 11, 2020.
B. Performance Period found in paragraph 4.01 is modified to extend term of contract from September 30, 2020 to June 30, 2023.
COMPENSATION:
Client agrees to compensate Consultant as follows:
Time and materials remain unchanged as called out in the Master Agreement for professional services dated May 11, 2020. Not to Exceed $1,109,738.40 without written authorization.
CONDITIONS AND OTHER PROVISIONS:
This Task Order shall be made to the original Agreement between Client and COWI on the date referenced above. All other conditions and provisions of Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
APPROVED
CLIENT: CONSULTANT:
BY:__________________________________ BY:____________________________________ NAME:_______________________________ NAME:_________________________________ TITLE:________________________________ TITLE:__________________________________ DATE:________________________________ DATE:__________________________________ [End of Task Order]
Jack Gerwick Vice President 5/27/22
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
TO: MAYOR GREENOUGH AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ERIC WIER, CITY MANAGER
BY: ASHLEY TAYLOR, ECON DEVELOPMENT & RECREATION DIRECTOR MARTHA D. RICE, CITY ATTORNEY
DATE: JUNE 20, 2022
SUBJECT: NOTE RESTRUCTURE WITH KEVEN BINGHAM FOR 308 G STREET ______________________________________________________________________
RECOMMENDATION
• Hear staff report
• Technical questions from the Council
• Receive public comment
• Further Council discussion
• Approve and Authorize the City Manager to sign an Amendment to Installment Note with Keven Bingham as presented
BACKGROUND
In 2013, the City instituted a receivership petition regarding 308 “G” Street in Crescent City. The property was owned by James Snow and constituted a public nuisance, fire hazard, and an immediate danger to the public health and safety. The property contained three structures all of which had been vacant for years and had fallen into a severe state of disrepair – visible dry rot, exposed wiring, broken and boarded windows, collapsing roofs, overgrown vegetation, and moldy asbestos siding. The City had been seeking compliance from Mr. Snow to cleanup the property for more than 10 years.
The court ordered the appointment of a receiver who oversaw the cleanup of the property, which consisted of safely demolishing the then-existing structures. As a result of the abatement of the conditions on the property, the City had obtained a lien on the property in the approximate amount of $56,500. As part of the receivership process, the property was sold in 2014 to Keven Bingham who had recently purchased the old Glen’s Bakery property across the street. Rather than pay the lien off immediately, Keven requested that the City take a note in the amount of the lien and allow Keven to pay it off over time. The City agreed.
Unfortunately, Mr. Bingham has had several setbacks in bringing his dreams of a bakery and restaurant to life. However, Mr. Bingham is not giving up on his dream and is working
BINGHAM NOTE
JUNE 20, 2022
2 on a new business plan for opening his bakery. As part of that plan, Mr. Bingham is requesting that the City amend the installment note for the debt to provide an interest only period for 24 months and then transition to interest and principal payments, to be fully amortized and paid in full in 15 years. The note is secured by a deed of trust on the property.
ITEM ANALYSIS
The original note was in the amount of $56,500 bearing interest at the rate of 6% per annum and due in five years (2019). Mr. Bingham is currently in default under that note.
The unpaid interest accrued under that note is due to the City according to the terms of the existing note.
The proposed Amendment to Installment Note sets forth the following amended terms:
• Outstanding principal amount of $58,363
• Interest rate of 3.0% per annum
• Interest-only payments for the first 24 months ($145.91 per month) • Interest and principal payments for the remaining 156 months ($452.27 per month)
• All amounts due and owing under the Note are to be paid in full within 15 years.
Mr. Bingham’s business advisor states that based on Mr. Bingham’s pro forma, he will be able to make these payments without hardship in the coming years.
FISCAL ANALYSIS
This action will secure the payment of $58,363, which is owed to the City, in a manner that will also allow a local business owner the flexibility he needs to get his business up and running.
STRATEGIC PLAN ASSESSMENT
GOAL 2: Promote a thriving local economy
E. Create an environment that is conducive to attracting and retaining strong, sustainable businesses that reflect community needs and culture.
ATTACHMENTS
• Proposed Amendment to Installment Note
• Bingham Installment Note (2014)
• Bingham Deed of Trust (2014)
DO NOT DESTROY THIS NOTE
AMENDMENT TO INSTALLMENT NOTE
Date: June 20, 2022
THIS AMENDMENT TO INSTALLMENT NOTE (this “Amendment”) is entered into by and between Keven J.
Bingham (“Obligor”) and the City of Crescent City, a California municipal corporation (“Holder”).
WHEREAS, Obligor executed and delivered an Installment Note dated as of September 10, 2014 for the benefit of Holder in the original principal amount of $56,500 (the “Note”); WHEREAS, Holder and Obligor are parties to that certain Deed of Trust dated as of September 10, 2014 and recorded on 9/24/2014 as Doc# 20143761 in the Official Records of Del Norte County, California “Deed of Trust”);
WHEREAS, the Holder and Obligor desire to amend the Note to reflect the terms set forth herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, for other good and valuable consideration, the parties agree to amend the Note to reflect the following terms:
1. PRINCIPAL AMOUNT. From and after the date hereof, the principal amount owing by Obligor shall be $58,363. Total interest payments under the Note will equal $15,692.51.
2. INTEREST RATE. From and after the date hereof, the interest rate shall be 3.0% per annum. Each payment will be credited on interest then due, and the remainder on principal; and interest will thereupon cease upon the principal so credited.
3. INTEREST-ONLY PAYMENTS. Obligor promises to make payments of $145.91 or more on the 20th day of each month, said amount representing interest only, and commencing on July 20, 2022 and continuing through June 20, 2024.
4. INTEREST AND PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS. Commencing July 20, 2024, Obligor promises to pay $452.27, or more to Holder, representing principal and interest, and continuing until June 20, 2037, when all amounts due and owing under the Note as amended hereby are due.
5. REMAINING PROVISIONS. The remaining provisions of the Note not the subject of this Amendment continue in full force and affect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Note as of the date first written above.
OBLIGOR HOLDER
Keven J. Bingham Eric Wier, City Manager
City of Crescent City
ATTEST:
Robin Patch, City Clerk
City of Crescent City
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
TO: MAYOR GREENOUGH AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ERIC WIER, CITY MANAGER
BY: SUNNY VALERO, HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGER
DATE: JUNE 20, 2022
SUBJECT: HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT BUDGET AMENDMENT
______________________________________________________________________
RECOMMENDATION
• Approve and adopt Resolution No. 2022-41, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CRESCENT CITY AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2021-22 BUDGET OF THE CITY OF CRESCENT CITY
BACKGROUND / ANALYSIS
The City’s Human Resources Department is a department of one handling all of the HR needs of the City. Recruiting for new employees is a very time-consuming task of Human Resources. And because the City cannot always control when the need for a recruitment will arise, the demand can be unpredictable from year to year. Over the last six months, the City has had a significant number of recruitments and a number of the recruitments required extensive recruiting efforts. These efforts have led to the need for unanticipated overtime expenses.
FISCAL ANALYSIS
The budget amendment in the amount of $5,000 is needed to cover additional overtime for Human Resources. This amount will have minimal impact to any single fund as it is shared across several City funds.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution No. 2022-41
CITY OF CRESCENT CITY RESOLUTION NO. 2022-41 Page 1
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-41
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CRESCENT CITY AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2021-22 BUDGET OF THE CITY OF CRESCENT CITY WHEREAS, the budget for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2021, as submitted by the City Manager, was reviewed by the City Council and a public hearing was held thereon the 21 st day of June 2021; and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted said budget and has the authority to amend said budget from time to time; and
WHEREAS, the City has had an unusual number open recruitments for the City; and WHEREAS, the City has one employee that manages all services of Human Resources, and increased recruitment needs have led to an increase in overtime costs; and WHEREAS, appropriation of funds necessitates City Council approval; and WHEREAS, fulfillment of these priorities requires an amendment to the City’s Fiscal Year 2021-2022 budget.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CRESCENT CITY AS FOLLOWS:
1. That the Fiscal Year 2021-22 City of Crescent City Annual Budget is hereby amended and appropriated in the amounts identified below:
Revenue Increase (Decrease) Expenditure Increase (Decrease) General Fund $0 $5,000
APPROVED and ADOPTED and made effective the same day at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Crescent City held on the 20th day of June 2022 by the following polled vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
_______________________________
Jason Greenough, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________
Robin Patch, City Clerk
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
TO: MAYOR GREENOUGH AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ERIC WIER, CITY MANAGER
BY: JON OLSON, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
ANDREW LEIGHTON, ENGINEERING PROJECT MANAGER
DATE: JUNE 20, 2022
SUBJECT: LOCAL ROAD SAFETY PLAN FOR THE CITY OF CRESCENT CITY ______________________________________________________________________
RECOMMENDATION
• Approve the Local Road Safety Plan for the City of Crescent City prepared by PlanWest Partners, Inc.
• Direct City staff in conjunction with PlanWest Partners, Inc. to prepare for two Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) grants applications for Council consideration at a future meeting.
BACKGROUND
The Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP) offers a proactive approach to addressing safety needs and demonstrates agency responsiveness to safety challenges. The development process provides a framework for organizing stakeholders to systematically identify, analyze, and prioritize roadway safety improvements on local roads. The process must be consistent with federal and state project funding requirements if those funds are to be used for project implementation.
The federal Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) is legislated under Section 148 of Title 23, United States Code (23 U.S.C. 148) and regulated under Part 924 of Title 23, Code of Federal Regulations (23 CFR Part 924). The HSIP consists of four main components, the Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP), State HSIP or program of highway safety improvement projects, the Railway-Highway Crossing Program (RHCP), and the High-Risk Rural Roads (HRRR) program.
Each State has a data driven and comprehensive SHSP that defines goals, objectives, and strategies to reduce fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads. SHSP development is typically led by the State Department of Transportation (DOT) in collaboration with the Governor's Office of Highway Safety, local governments, law enforcement, educators, emergency services, and other stakeholders.
LOCAL ROAD SAFETY PLAN
June 20, 2022
2 The HRRR can specifically include local and rural roads as safety emphasis areas. This makes local and rural road owners important partners in developing an LRSP because nearly 80% of all public roads are operated by local or rural governments and approximately 56% of all fatalities occur on these roads.
Agencies use three major project selection methodologies in LRSP development: risk factor analysis, high-crash locations, or a combination of the two. Projects can be identified through a systemic safety analysis using a risk factor analysis to identify locations with a high potential for crashes, and not necessarily a history of crashes. Since fatalities and serious injuries can be random in nature and spread throughout a local roadway system, this methodology allows for a proactive approach to reducing fatalities and serious injuries based on roadway, intersection, or curve features along the system.
The City signed a professional services agreement with PlanWest Partners, Inc. on August 2, 2021 to develop the LRSP. The final LRSP report is well ahead of the grant requirements which does not require completion until 2024. The project remains under budget.
ITEM ANALYSIS
The Crescent City LRSP provides a data-driven framework for identifying, analyzing, and prioritizing roadway safety improvement project. Plan development included the following:
• Review and analysis of ten years of collision data from Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS), and local data.
• In coordination with the County, a project website was created to host a survey and interactive map which allowed members of the public to comment on safety issues in the City.
• Following the data collection and analysis, there were two virtual stakeholder working group meetings. Stakeholders included representatives from law enforcement, emergency services, education, transportation planning organizations, tribes, and others.
• Based on the collision data analysis and the stakeholder working group input, the LRSP identified multiple Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) Challenge Areas such as pedestrians, bicyclists, lane departures, intersections, and aggressive driving.
• Data analysis, public input, and City feedback helped to determine the priority locations within Crescent City. Some of the intersection locations are along state highways and fall within Caltrans jurisdiction.
LOCAL ROAD SAFETY PLAN
June 20, 2022
3 The LRSP provides a list of countermeasures for priority intersections and roadways segments based on collision analysis and the feedback from the City, stakeholders, and public. The non-engineering strategies were also developed through stakeholder engagement. The engineering countermeasures in the plan coincide with HSIP funding and include but are not limited to: upgrade intersection pavement markings, install/upgrade larger or additional stop signs or other intersection warning/regulatory signs, install/upgrade pedestrian crossing (with enhanced safety features), and install sidewalk/pathway (to avoid walking along roadway). Pedestrian crossing enhancements and bicycle safety improvements are fundable through set-aside funding in the HSIP grant program. Improvements for these can qualify for funding without having prior collision history. Systemic countermeasures regarding pedestrian crossings can be implemented at crossing locations at schools, downtown, and other mid-block locations.
The findings and recommended projects contained within the LRSP can be used to help guide project development and funding applications over the coming years. The intent of the plan is to be a ‘living document’ and as such staff will work to update the plan every five years. As this is a living document, any and all are encouraged to continue to provide feedback to the City for future safety improvement needs.
PlanWest Partners, Inc has contracted to assist the City in the application for two HSIP grants for the current cycle 11 to be selected and presented to council at a future date..
Applications are due before September 12, 2022.
FISCAL ANALYSIS
This project is grant-funded through Regional Planning Assistance (RPA), with no required match. The City issued a Request for Proposals in May 2021 and received two proposals from qualified firms. The selection panel chose Planwest Partners as the best fit for this project. The Planwest Proposal is included with the professional services agreement attached to this report.
As shown in the below summary, the proposal meets the funding limit with a contingency of $199.
Grant Funding: $40,000
Planwest Partners, Inc. proposal: $39,801
Change Orders / Extra work: N/A
City Labor: N/A
Total Estimated Remaining Funds: $199
At present PlanWest Partners is at or under budget based upon current invoicing.
STRATEGIC PLAN ASSESSMENT
GOAL 1: Support quality services, community safety, and health to enhance the quality of life and experience of our residents and visitors.
LOCAL ROAD SAFETY PLAN
June 20, 2022
4 C. Empower and utilize Police, Fire, and Public Works departments to make Crescent City one of the safest cities in the United States D. Provide and maintain an efficient, adequate infrastructure to provide for both current and future community needs
GOAL 2: Promote a thriving local economy
A. Evaluate and optimize additional revenue sources
D. Collaborate with other jurisdictions and non-profits to maximize regional effectiveness and amplify funding opportunities
F. Plan and prepare for the growth and future needs of the Crescent City community by:
• Expanding on the success of grant funding by maximizing utilization of opportunities with corresponding community needs
ATTACHMENTS
1. Local Road Safety Plan Final Report
Local Road Safety Plan
City of Crescent City
June2022
Acknowledgements
A special thanks to all the Safety Partners that contributed to this plan.
The Stakeholder Working Group included the following representatives:
• County of Del Norte
• City of Crescent City
• Del Norte Local Transportation Commission
• Caltrans, District 1
• Del Norte County Department of Health and
Human Services
• Elk Valley Rancheria
• Tolowa Dee-ni’ Nation
• Yurok Tribe
• Resighini Rancheria
• Downtown Divas
• College of the Redwoods
• Crescent City Harbor District
• Redwood Coast Transit
• Del Norte Trail Alliance
• Del Norte Unified School District
Law enforcement and emergency responders including:
• Crescent City Police Department
• California Highway Patrol
• Crescent City Fire and Rescue
• Fort Dick Fire Protection District (FPD)
• Gasquet FPD
• Klamath FPD
• Smith River FPD
• Del Norte Ambulance
• Del Norte County Sheriff’s Office
City of Crescent City
Local Road Safety Plan – June 2022 [i]
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 1
1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 3
2. BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................... 4
2.1 Purpose and Need ...................................................................................................................................4
2.2 Methodology ...........................................................................................................................................6
3. SAFETY PARTNERS/ STAKEHOLDERS ........................................................................................ 8
3.1 Stakeholder Working Group Members...................................................................................................8
3.2 SHSP Challenge Areas..............................................................................................................................9
3.3 Guiding Principles....................................................................................................................................9
4. ANALYZE SAFETY DATA ..................................................................................................... 11
4.1 Recently Completed Projects ............................................................................................................... 11
4.2 Collision Data........................................................................................................................................ 12
4.3 Collision Characteristics........................................................................................................................ 14
4.4 Field Reconnaissance............................................................................................................................ 18
5. PUBLIC OUTREACH .......................................................................................................... 19
5.1 Public Website...................................................................................................................................... 19
5.2 Interactive Map .................................................................................................................................... 19
5.3 Public Survey ........................................................................................................................................ 20
5.4 Public Workshop................................................................................................................................... 21
6. IDENTIFY STRATEGIES ........................................................................................................ 21
6.1 Engineering Strategies.......................................................................................................................... 21
6.2 Non-Engineering Strategies.................................................................................................................. 27
7. PRIORITIZE AND INCORPORATE STRATEGIES ............................................................................ 27
7.1 Funding Sources ................................................................................................................................... 27
7.2 Prioritized Projects ............................................................................................................................... 28
8. EVALUATION PROCESS ...................................................................................................... 28
9. NEXT STEPS .................................................................................................................... 29
10. REFERENCES ................................................................................................................. 30
City of Crescent City
Local Road Safety Plan – June 2022 [ii]
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: Priority Intersections and Recommended Countermeasures .......................................................................2 Table 2: Priority Segments and Recommended Countermeasures.............................................................................2 Table 3: Comprehensive Collison Costs and EPDO Weights (2020 dollars).............................................................. 16 Table 4: Top Intersections on Roadways in Crescent City (Per Collision Analysis)................................................... 16 Table 5: Top Segments on Roadways in Crescent City (Per Collision Analysis)........................................................ 16 Table 6: Priority Intersection Characteristics........................................................................................................... 22 Table 7: Recommended Countermeasures for Priority Intersections...................................................................... 23 Table 8: Priority Segments Characteristics............................................................................................................... 24 Table 9: Recommended Countermeasures for Priority Segments........................................................................... 24 Table 10: Systemic Countermeasures...................................................................................................................... 25 Table 11: Project Recommendations from Public Outreach.................................................................................... 26
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1: California SHSP (2020-2024) ........................................................................................................................3 Figure 2: FHWA’s LRSP Development Process ............................................................................................................3 Figure 3: Fatal and Severe Injury Collisions in the City of Crescent City (2011-2020).................................................5 Figure 4: SHSP Challenge Areas ..................................................................................................................................6 Figure 5: FHWA’s LRSP Development Map (Source: Federal Highway Administration)..............................................7 Figure 6: Collision Density Map (2011-2020)........................................................................................................... 13 Figure 6: Total Collisions within the City of Crescent City (2011-2020) ................................................................... 14 Figure 8: Collision Characteristics (Severity and Collision Type) .............................................................................. 14 Figure 9: Top Causes of Collisions (City Jurisdiction)................................................................................................ 15 Figure 10: Bicycle Collisions from 2011 to 2020 ...................................................................................................... 17 Figure 11: Pedestrian Collisions from 2011 to 2020)............................................................................................... 18 Figure 12: Front Street at Play Street....................................................................................................................... 19 Figure 13: Public Website Interactive Map.............................................................................................................. 20 Figure 14: Public Survey Areas of Concern .............................................................................................................. 20
APPENDICES
Appendix A Stakeholder and Public Input
Appendix B Collision Data
Appendix C Field Reconnaissance
City of Crescent City
Local Road Safety Plan – June 2022 [iii]
List of Abbreviations
AASHTO American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials APS Accessible Pedestrian Signal
ATP Active Transportation Program or Plan
BCR Benefit to Cost Ratio
BUI Biking Under the Influence
CA MUTCD California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices CMAQ Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality
DUI Driving Under the Influence
EPDO Equivalent Property Damage Only
FHWA Federal Highway Administration
FSI Fatal or Severe Injury
HSIP Highway Safety Improvement Program
HSM Highway Safety Manual
LRSM Local Roadway Safety Manual
LRSP Local Road (or Roadway) Safety Plan
SHSP Strategic Highway Safety Plan
SSAR Systemic Safety Analysis Report
SWITRS Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System
TIMS Transportation Injury Mapping System
City of Crescent City
Local Road Safety Plan – June 2022 [1]
Executive Summary
In 2020, the City of Crescent City was awarded a state grant from Caltrans to perform a Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP). The LRSP is a requirement for Cycle 11 of the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP). The LRSP grant application included a citywide analysis of the roadway system evaluating the current collisions patterns and high-risk roadway characteristics (systemic analysis). Crescent City’s goal is to identify safety countermeasures to help mitigate the City’s primary crash type trends and reduce the overall collision severity.
This LRSP is a collaborative process with a local leadership group that represents the 5 E’s (not just engineering) and public outreach. The 5 E’s of traffic safety include Engineering, Enforcement, Education, Emergency Services, and Emerging Technologies.
This holistic approach allows certain areas of concern not showing a crash pattern to be analyzed. Also, it fosters local, state, and agency partnerships to advance local road safety.
In following the overall LRSP process, a Stakeholder Working Group (Working Group) was formed with the City of Crescent City and Del Norte County as the leads and local organizations from the 5 E’s and anyone with an interest in improving the City and County’s roadway safety. This group gathered for meetings to discuss the overall collision analysis, goals, priorities, safety recommendations, and overall development of the safety plan.
Based on the past 5 years’ collision analysis and the Stakeholder Working Group Meetings, this LRSP will address multiple Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) Challenge/Emphasis Areas including but not limited to:
1. Intersections
2. Aggressive Driving/ Speed Management
3. Bicyclists
4. Lane Departures
5. Pedestrians
6. Impaired Driving
In addition, the vision, mission statement, and goals were established in guiding the development of the LRSP. It was also decided that the LRSP for the City of Crescent City would be a living document with desired updates every five (5) years.
Data analysis, public input, and City feedback helped to determine the priority locations within Crescent City.
Some of the intersection locations are along state highways and fall within Caltrans jurisdiction. These locations have been separated from the City jurisdiction intersections. All the locations, along with their proposed countermeasures, are shown in the tables below.
City of Crescent City
Local Road Safety Plan – June 2022 [2]
Table 1: Priority Intersections and Recommended Countermeasures Location (North/South Road) Recommended Countermeasures J St/ 7th St Install/update warning signs, upgrade intersection pavement markings, improve sight distance to intersection, re-evaluate parking near intersection
H St/ 8th St Install/update warning signs, upgrade intersection pavement markings, re-evaluate parking near intersection, re-evaluate stop sign location
Gary St/ Becky Ct. Install/update signs with new florescent sheeting, Install variable speed warning signs, speed enforcement
A St/ Essex St Speed enforcement
Breen St./ Coolidge Ave Improve sight distance to intersection, speed enforcement Table 2: Priority Segments and Recommended Countermeasures Location (City Jurisdiction) Recommended Countermeasures E Cooper Ave from Cemetery Rd to US 101 No Countermeasure Proposed: The single collision at this segment was driveway related.
Systemic Add intersection lighting, Install/upgrade larger or additional stop signs or other intersection warning/regulatory signs, Upgrade intersection pavement markings, Install/upgrade pedestrian crossing at uncontrolled locations, Install/Upgrade signs with new fluorescent sheeting (regulatory or warning), Install sidewalk/pathway (to avoid walking along roadway)
Location (Caltrans Jurisdiction) Recommended Countermeasures US 101 from Front St to Elk Valley Rd Install sidewalk/pathway (to avoid walking along roadway) between N Street and Front Street, Install/upgrade pedestrian crossing (with enhanced safety features), pedestrian education campaign, DUI enforcement
US 101 from E Cooper Ave to 9th St No Countermeasure Proposed: The single collision at this segment was a sideswipe.
It is important to understand the upcoming funding opportunities in the successful implementation of these safety projects. Most of the proposed countermeasures are HSIP fundable (next cycle 11 is scheduled to open in April/May 2022). However, countermeasures can be implemented through other funding sources including:
• Rural Surface Transportation Grant
• Active Transportation Program (ATP)
• Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant (Sustainable Communities) • Stimulus funding sources
• Capital Improvement Program or with on-going maintenance work City of Crescent City
Local Road Safety Plan – June 2022 [3]
1. Introduction
The Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP) provides local agencies an opportunity to address unique roadway safety needs in their jurisdictions. This comprehensive document will both help to guide the City in safety countermeasures and allow eligibility for funding in future HSIP applications. The process of preparing an LRSP creates a framework to systematically identify and analyze local safety problems and recommend engineering safety improvements for future Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) funding.
Preparing an LRSP facilitates local agency partnerships and collaboration, resulting in a prioritized list of improvements and actions that contribute to California’s Strategic
Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) overall vision and goals. This SHSP focuses on reducing fatal and severe injury collisions (FSI collisions) within challenge/emphasis areas with a focus on the Five “E’s” of Traffic Safety (see Figure 1).
The City will follow the Federal Highway Administration’s (FHWA) Local Road Safety process in the following six (6) steps as shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2: FHWA’s LRSP Development Process
For the first step of establishing leadership, the City of Crescent City, the County of Del Norte, and the consultant team, reached out to the various stakeholder representative for the LRSP working group in capturing the “5E’s” and local community members that can contribute to the overall safety plan for the City of Crescent City. This working group was key in creating a comprehensive safety plan that is tailored to address local needs and issues.
Figure 1: California SHSP (2020-2024)
City of Crescent City
Local Road Safety Plan – June 2022 [4]
2. Background
2.1 Purpose and Need
The City of Crescent City has an estimated population of 6,673 as of the 2020 U.S. Census. It is the only incorporated city in Del Norte County and has US Highway 101 running through the City. The City roadways serve a variety of users including pedestrians, bicyclists, transit riders, passenger cars, and heavy trucks, with a mix of local, recreational, and regional trips.
Crescent City adopted the Economic Development Strategic Action Plan (also known as the Economic Cookbook) on June 21, 2021. This plan was created to envision the future economic characteristics of the City and provides a framework to achieve this vision. The plan contains nine economic developmental goals, establishes over a dozen targeted industry sectors, and presents over eighty projects relating to meeting the economic developmental goals. The following goals from this plan relate to the LRSP:
Goal 6: Pursue infrastructure improvement as a form of economic development Goal 7: Focus on efforts to enhance downtown
Additionally, some of the projects set forth in this plan may correlate or be part of safety projects that will be recommended through the LRSP. Some examples of these projects and how the LRSP relates to the project are described below:
1K: Partner with Del Norte School District. The LRSP includes representation from the school district in its stakeholder working group.
1N: Partner with Chamber of Commerce. The LRSP includes representation from the Chamber of Commerce in its stakeholder working group.
1O: Other Key Partnership. The LRSP development process was a collaborative effort between Del Norte County and the City.
2C: Grant Availability Inventory. The LRSP will contain a list of potential grant programs relating to transportation funding. Some of the countermeasures recommended in the LRSP are fundable through the HSIP grant program. 6A: City Management Planning. This LRSP can serve as a management plan for the City’s road system in terms of roadway safety.
6B: Think of all City Activities as Economic Development. Safety improvements, which are infrastructure improvements in general, are a City activity that can encourage further economic development. 6D: Front Street Improvements. There are no specific improvements currently identified for the remaining section of Front Street. However, systemic countermeasures can be implemented to reduce collision risks. 6M: Utility Underground. Roadway lighting needs can be incorporated with this effort. 6P: Support Regional Transportation Infrastructure. US 101 is a regional highway that runs through the City. The LRSP recommended potential countermeasures along US 101. 6Q: Enhancements to Pedestrian and Bicycle Infrastructure. The LRSP proposed countermeasures (specific and systemic locations) to address pedestrian and bicycle safety deficiencies.
City of Crescent City
Local Road Safety Plan – June 2022 [5]
8A: Re-envision Downtown. The LRSP proposed systemic countermeasures that can be applied to downtown roadways relating to pedestrian and bicycle safety. Improving pedestrian and bicycle safety will potentially encourage more activity.
8Q: Highway 101 Improvements through Downtown East. Some systemic countermeasures recommended in the LRSP can be implemented through downtown segments of US 101. Improvements along US 101 will need to be coordinated with Caltrans.
City Roadways
During the ten-year period (2011-2020), there were no fatal and one severe injury collisions recorded for the roadways under the City of Crescent City’s jurisdiction. There was one fatal and one severe injury collision on Caltrans roadways at the intersections of City roadways. The fatal incident was an alcohol related vehicle-pedestrian collision where the pedestrian was not crossing the street in a crosswalk in the dark with no streetlights.
See Figure 3 for a map of the fatal and severe injury collisions on City and Caltrans roadways between 2011 and 2020. In improving roadway safety for the City of Crescent City, it is important to focus on mitigating these high injury and loss of life collisions.
Figure 3: Fatal and Severe Injury Collisions in the City of Crescent City (2011-2020) City of Crescent City
Local Road Safety Plan – June 2022 [6]
Standards and Guidelines
In developing the City of Crescent City’s LRSP, the following standards and guidelines were followed:
• “Local Roadway Safety, A Manual for California’s Local Road Owners”, Caltrans, Version 1.5, April 2020. • 2020-2024 California’s Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP), “California Safe Roads: 2020-2024 Strategic Highway Safety Plan”, Caltrans.
• “Developing Safety Plans, A Manual for Local Rural Road Owners”, Federal Highway Administration, March 2012.
• “Highway Safety Manual”, American Association of State Highway Officials (AASHTO), 1st Edition, 2014 supplement.
• “California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD)”, Revision 5, 2014.
California Strategic Highway Safety Plan
The LRSP will complement California’s SHSP 2020-2024. Per this plan, the recommended challenge areas are shown in Figure 4. This plan will focus on challenge/emphasis areas that are determined through data analysis and stakeholder input.
Figure 4: SHSP Challenge Areas
2.2 Methodology
The LRSP methodology followed the FHWA’s LRSP development process as shown in Figure 5.
Below is a roadmap created by the Federal Highway Administration to show the process of creating the Local Road Safety Plan. Here are the primary steps used to create this plan:
1. Identify Stakeholders
• Working Group was formed of the 5 E’s and other interested representatives.
2. Use Safety Data
• Past 5 years of collisions were analyzed with discussion of other high-risk locations.
City of Crescent City
Local Road Safety Plan – June 2022 [7]
3. Chose Proven Solutions
• FHWA Proven Countermeasures and Caltrans safety countermeasures were used in mitigation collision trends and risk characteristics.
4. Implement Solutions
• Projects were identified for specific location and systemically.
Figure 5: FHWA’s LRSP Development Map (Source: Federal Highway Administration) City of Crescent City
Local Road Safety Plan – June 2022 [8]
3. Safety Partners/ Stakeholders
3.1 Stakeholder Working Group Members
Based on community connections, the City of Crescent City and the County of Del Norte led the formation of the LRSP Stakeholder Working Member Group. This leadership group was crucial in the development of the LRSP and helped in capturing the safety needs, goals, and priorities including safety countermeasures for the City of Crescent City.
The Stakeholder Working Group included the following representatives:
• County of Del Norte
• City of Crescent City
• Del Norte Local Transportation Commission
• Caltrans, District 1
• Del Norte County Department of Health and
Human Services
• Elk Valley Rancheria
• Tolowa Dee-ni’ Nation
• Yurok Tribe
• Resighini Rancheria
• Downtown Divas
• College of the Redwoods
• Crescent City Harbor District
• Redwood Coast Transit
• Del Norte Trail Alliance
School Districts and Education representatives including: Del Norte Unified School District • Bess Maxwell Elementary School
• Joe Hamilton Elementary School
• Margaret Keating Elementary School
• Mountain Elementary School
• Pine Grove Elementary School
• Redwood Elementary School
• Smith River Elementary School
• Crescent Elk Elementary School
• Del Norte High School
• Sunset High School
• Adult Education School
• Del Norte Community School
• Castle Rock Charter School
• Uncharted Shores Academey
Law enforcement and public assistance members including:
• Crescent City Police Department
• California Highway Patrol
• Crescent City Fire and Rescue
• Fort Dick Fire Protection District (FPD)
• Gasquet FPD
• Klamath FPD
• Smith River FPD
• Del Norte Ambulance
• Del Norte County Sheriff’s Office
City of Crescent City
Local Road Safety Plan – June 2022 [9]
Stakeholder Working Group Meetings
Three meetings were held with the stakeholder working group and facilitated by the consultant team. The virtual meetings were as follows:
• Monday, December 6, 2021 from 1 p.m. to 3 p.m. / Wednesday, December 8, 2021 from 2 p.m. to 4 p.m. o Discussed the LRSP overall process, working group members’ safety priorities, past 6 years of collisions (County and Caltrans roadways), vision, goals, and priorities. • Monday, February 7, 2022 from 2 p.m. to 4 p.m.
o Reviewed first meeting, discussed public comments and ways to address their concerns, recent developments, safety countermeasures and projects, refined of LRSP’s guiding principles, and coordinated next steps.
The meeting agendas for the stakeholder working group meetings are in Appendix A: Stakeholder and Public Input.
The stakeholder working group also provided their feedback and comments on the Draft Local Road Safety Plan document before the plan was finalized. With many of the safety countermeasures to include engineering, enforcement, and emergency response, it is important to have buy off from the stakeholders in understanding how the plan will be implemented.
3.2 SHSP Challenge Areas
Based on the LRSP Working Group Meetings, this LRSP will address multiple Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) Challenge Areas including:
1. Intersections
2. Aggressive Driving/ Speed Management
3. Bicyclists
4. Lane Departures
5. Pedestrians
6. Impaired Driving
3.3 Guiding Principles
The City along with members of the working group coordinated to establish the vision, mission statement, and goals that guided the development of the document. Ideally, this document will help the City move toward Vision Zero. The aim of Vision Zero is to eliminate all traffic fatalities and severe injuries, while increasing safe, healthy, and equitable mobility for all. Traditionally, traffic deaths and severe injuries have been considered as inevitable side effects of modern life. The reality is that these tragedies can be addressed over time by taking a proactive, preventative approach that prioritizes traffic safety as a public health issue.
Safe System Approach
The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) is using the Safe System approach to work towards their goal of zero fatalities in vehicles. In providing a comprehensive approach to safety, the Safe System approach is to design our vehicles and infrastructure in a manner that anticipates human error and accommodates human tolerances with a goal of reducing fatal and serious injuries. The following framework is intended to assist the vehicle and infrastructure communities in making decisions in alignment with Safe System principles. Implementing and selecting safe system practices and design will incrementally improve safety over time.
City of Crescent City
Local Road Safety Plan – June 2022 [10]
FHWA defines the Safe System Approach Principles and Elements as follows:
• Safe Road Users—The safety of all road users is equitably addressed, including those who walk, bike, drive, ride transit, or travel by other modes.
• Safe Vehicles—Vehicles are designed and regulated to minimize the frequency and severity of collisions using safety measures that incorporate the latest technology. • Safe Speeds—Humans are less likely to survive high-speed crashes. Reducing speeds can accommodate human-injury tolerances in three ways: reducing impact forces, providing additional time for drivers to stop, and improving visibility.
• Safe Roads—Designing transportation infrastructure to accommodate human mistakes and injury tolerances can greatly reduce the severity of crashes that do occur. Examples include physically separating people traveling at different speeds, providing dedicated times for different users to move through a space, and alerting users to hazards and other road users. • Post-Crash Care—People who are injured in collisions rely on emergency first responders to quickly locate and stabilize their injuries and transport them to medical facilities. Post-crash care also includes forensic analysis at the crash site, traffic incident management, and other activities.
Adopting a Safe System approach does not absolve users of their responsibility. Other safety practices such as speed management strategies, driver education, enforcement, and effective emergency response will remain essential to improving road safety.
Vision
A vision statement describes what the Local Road Safety Plan is trying to achieve. Crescent City’s vision is as follows.
The City of Crescent City will strive toward the elimination of all traffic fatalities and severe injuries, while increasing safe, healthy, and equitable mobility for all.
Mission Statement
The mission statement defines the purpose of the plan, what it does, and what it is about. The mission statement was developed in collaboration with the working group. Crescent City’s mission statement is as follows.
Crescent City will provide a safe, innovative, efficient, and equitable multimodal transportation system for all users of the public roadways in the City in order to promote a high quality of life for residents, businesses, and visitors.
Goals
Safety goals were developed for the Local Roadway Safety Plan. It is important to capture realistic goals that can be measurable or evolve over time.
1. Create a safe, livable, healthy, and welcoming community by developing a roadway safety plan that targets Crescent City’s transportation and roadway safety needs.
2. Reduce fatal and injury collisions Citywide by increased maintenance, grant funded projects, and increased education and enforcement.
City of Crescent City
Local Road Safety Plan – June 2022 [11]
3. Identify cost-effective countermeasures and safety investments that can be applied systemically (i.e., flashing yellow arrow, retroreflective backplates, leading pedestrian interval, etc.).
4. Reduce hit object and lane departures collisions by implementing safety countermeasures and strategies.
5. Improve multimodal transportation safety by expanding the City’s opportunities for non-motorized transportation infrastructure.
6. Improve safety around schools by increasing multimodal infrastructure, enhanced crossings, and education and enforcement.
7. Reduce speeding and improper turning related collisions through engineering, enforcement, emerging technologies, and education strategies.
4. Analyze Safety Data
4.1 Recently Completed Projects
Front Street Project
The City secured a Community Development Block Grant to help reduce flooding of residential properties. This Project installed a redundant storm drain piping system within the C Street drainage basin between 5th Street and Front Street, and F Street drainage basin between Front Street and 4th Street. The Project also includes street improvements, ADA compliant curb ramps, sidewalks and curb and gutter on the affected streets.
Sunset Circle Multi-Use Trail Project
The Sunset Circle Multi-Use Trail Project connects the existing North Harbor Trail along Beachfront Park to the Promenade Trail at the Harbor with a multi-use path. Sunset Circle is the last significant segment of the California Coastal Trail to be upgraded to a shared-use facility in the immediate Crescent City area. The completion of this project has created a safe and convenient route for tourists and recreational users who actively use the two trail systems today. The trail is conveniently located adjacent to established lodging, tourist destinations, and a recreational vehicle campground. This project has created an apparent route for visitors and tourists unfamiliar City of Crescent City
Local Road Safety Plan – June 2022 [12]
with the City to both the Harbor and Downtown Crescent City. For local residents already using Sunset Circle as a connection, the trail has created a safer and more inviting environment for recreational activities.
4.2 Collision Data
The City of Crescent City collision data was gathered using the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) and Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS). Each data set was analyzed, crosschecked, and compiled into one complete comprehensive data set. The data set contains ten years’ worth of collisions spanning from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2020. A heat map of collisions is shown in Figure 6.
Between 2011 and 2020, 40 collisions were reported in the City of Crescent City. These collisions were classified based on roadway jurisdiction (City or Caltrans). Collisions were further categorized into intersection related collisions and roadway segment related collisions with a separate focus on City streets and Caltrans roadways.
The pie chart in Figure 7 depicts the number of collisions by collision location (intersection or segment) and jurisdiction (City, US 101). The highest number of collisions was along US Highway 101 Intersections (17 collisions).
City of Crescent City
Local Road Safety Plan – June 2022 [13]
Figure 6: Collision Density Map (2011-2020)
City of Crescent City
Local Road Safety Plan – June 2022 [14]
Figure 7: Total Collisions within the City of Crescent City (2011-2020) As shown on the collision density map for 2011 to 2020, areas with high density of collisions include intersections along Highway 101 (Caltrans jurisdiction) and intersections along H Street. It should be noted however that these locations only include a small number of accidents.
4.3 Collision Characteristics
Of the 40 collisions recorded within Crescent City between 2011 and 2020, there was 1 fatal and 3 severe injury collisions. The fatal collision occurred on US 101 just north of Elk Valley Road in Caltrans jurisdiction. Since the incident occurred, pedestrian safety projects have been completed in that area. One of the severe injury collisions also took place on US 101 at Citizens Dock Road which is also Caltrans jurisdiction. Hit object and broadside were the most common types of collisions within the City. Figure 8 below summarized the City jurisdiction collisions based on severity and type.
Figure 8: Collision Characteristics (Severity and Collision Type) City of Crescent City
Local Road Safety Plan – June 2022 [15]
The top violation categories for City jurisdiction roadways are presented in Figure 9. The top violation category on City roadways (not including unknown or not stated collisions) was unsafe speed followed by automobile right of way.
With the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) funding concentrating on the past five (5) years of collision data, further collision analysis focused on 2016 to 2020. The total number of collisions and Equivalent Property Damage Only (EPDO) rating were assessed to determine the top study intersections (refer to Appendix B: Collision Data). Per the Caltrans Local Roadway Safety Manual, it is recommended to rank locations with higher severity as higher focus. The Highway Safety Manual (HSM) methodology of Equivalent Property Damage Only (EPDO) rating assigns a weight to collisions in capturing the relative severity in equivalent property damage only (PDO =1).
Table 3 provides the comprehensive collision costs and EPDO weights that were used in ranking the collisions.
Collision costs include both direct and indirect costs. Direct crash costs include ambulance service, police and fire services, property damage, insurance, and other costs directly related to the crashes. Indirect collision costs account for the value society would place on pain and suffering or loss of life associated with the crash.
Figure 9: Top Causes of Collisions (City Jurisdiction)
City of Crescent City
Local Road Safety Plan – June 2022 [16]
Table 3: Comprehensive Collison Costs and EPDO Weights (2020 dollars) Severity Location Comprehensive Costs EPDO Ranking
Fatal & Severe Injury Signalized Intersection $1,590,000 120 Non-Signalized Intersection $2,530,000 190
Roadway $2,190,000 165
Other Visible Injury - $142,000 11
Complaint of Pain - $80,900 6
Property Damage Only - $13,300 1
The intersection of H and 8th Streets had the highest severity ranking or EPDO (7), and the highest number of collisions (2). Table 4 shows the top intersections, per collision analysis. Further detailed collision analysis is in Appendix A: Collision Data.
Table 4: Top Intersections on Roadways in Crescent City (Per Collision Analysis) North/ South Road East/ West Road LRSM EPDO Total Collisions H St 8th St 7 2
US 101 Elk Valley Rd 6 1
J St 7th St 1 1
Breen St. Coolidge Ave 1 1
The segment collisions were also analyzed by EPDO and total number of collisions. Table 5 shows the top segments, per collision analysis. The segment with the highest EPDO is US 101 from Front Street to Elk Valley Road. This falls within Caltrans jurisdiction and is currently being upgraded with sidewalks and other safety improvements.
Within the City’s jurisdiction, E Cooper Avenue from Cemetery Road to US 101 saw one collision during the analysis period. Due to the low EDPO rating and lack of other priority segments, the City will focus on systemic safety upgrades and intersection projects to help improve overall safety.
Table 5: Top Segments on Roadways in Crescent City (Per Collision Analysis) Segment
Length
(mi)
LRSM
EPDO
Total
Collisions
US 101 (Front St to Elk Valley Rd) 0.41 167 3
US 101 (E Cooper Ave to 9th St) 0.41 11 1
E Cooper Ave (from Cemetery Rd. to US 101) 0.13 1 1
City of Crescent City
Local Road Safety Plan – June 2022 [17]
Collisions Related to Challenge/ Emphasis Areas
Intersections
Between 2011 and 2020, 40 collisions took place on roadways in Crescent City including state highways in Caltrans jurisdiction. Of those, 32 (80%) occurred at intersections with 15 at intersections under the City’s jurisdiction and 17 occurring at intersections under Caltrans jurisdiction. The City intersection collisions were attributed to a number of factors including unsafe speed, following too closely, improper turning, automobile right of way, pedestrian right of way, and traffic signals/ signs.
Aggressive Driving / Speed Management
Aggressive driving including speeding can be assessed through collision violation categories for unsafe speed and traffic signals/ signs violations. There were 8 total unsafe speed collisions at City intersections from 2011 to 2020 and 1 collision related to traffic signals/ signs. There was 1 additional unsafe speed collision and 4 traffic signals/ signs collision on Caltrans roadways. Many of these incidents resulted in broadside or hit object collisions.
Bicyclists
There were 7 total bicycle collisions in the
City from 2011 to 2020 including 6 under
Caltrans jurisdiction (Figure 10). Broadside
incidents accounted for two collisions with
the other collision types being vehiclepedestrian interactions, or other/not stated.
The majority of these collisions took place
along Highway 101.
Pedestrians
There were three total collisions involving
pedestrians from 2011 to 2020. These
largely took place on roadways under
Caltrans jurisdiction including a fatal
incident on Highway 101 after the
intersection with Elk Valley Rd. The
pedestrian location at the time of collision,
along with corresponding severity, is shown
in Figure 11. Of the 3 collisions, one
included pedestrians in the road (including
the shoulder), and two involved pedestrians
crossing the road not in a crosswalk
(jaywalking).
Figure 10: Bicycle Collisions from 2011 to 2020
City of Crescent City
Local Road Safety Plan – June 2022 [18]
Figure 11: Pedestrian Collisions from 2011 to 2020)
Distracted Driving
Distracted driving is categorized in collision data as inattention. Categories for inattention include cell phones (handheld or hands-free), electronic equipment, smoking, eating, children, animal, personal hygiene, and reading.
From 2011 to 2020 there were 2 collisions related to distracted driving including one attributed to eating that resulted in a rear end collision on US 101 and another categorized as “Other”.
Impaired Driving
Impaired driving refers to driving under the influence of alcohol, controlled substances, or other substances that impairs a person’s mental capacity. Of the 40 collisions that occurred on City roadways, 4 involved alcohol with 1 incident directly attributed to driving under the influence that resulted in a head on collision.
4.4 Field Reconnaissance
A field visit was performed on February 23, 2022 to analyze the roadways throughout the City of Crescent City and observe areas with high densities of public comments and collisions. Notes and photos from this visit have been compiled in Appendix C: Field Reconnaissance.
Some key findings from the field review are noted below. • Faded pavement markings, including crosswalks, and lack of edge lines. • Discontinuous sidewalks were observed in several locations. • Uneven pavement and limited ADA curb ramps.
City of Crescent City
Local Road Safety Plan – June 2022 [19]
5. Public Outreach
5.1 Public Website
A project website was created on the Social Pinpoint platform to inform the public about the LRSP and provide a platform for public engagement for both the City and Del Norte County LRSPs. The project website had the Google Translate option enabled that could translate the webpage in over 100 languages and detect the user’s browsers settings to automatically display the website in their language preference. In addition, the user could toggle the preferred language on the upper right corner of the webpage. Visitors to the page were invited to provide comments on an interactive project map and share their thoughts through a project survey. Comments from the interactive map and detailed results from the survey are included in Appendix A: Stakeholder and Public Input.
5.2 Interactive Map
The interactive map feature on the website allowed the public to drag icons to a location within the City and County and leave a comment regarding driving, transit, schools biking, or pedestrians at that location. Figure 13 shows the interactive map feature from the website. Areas with high densities of interactive map comments within the City of Crescent City included areas along Front St, along 9th St, along A St, on 5th St at US 101, E Cooper Ave at US 101 and on H St near 11th St.
Figure 12: Front Street at Play Street
City of Crescent City
Local Road Safety Plan – June 2022 [20]
5.3 Public Survey
The City of Crescent City and the County of Del Norte Public Survey asked nine questions relating to the LRSP. In total, 53 survey responses were received. The interactive map received 94 total comments with 30 comments relating directly to the City. According to the survey, the primary safety issues identified were lack of infrastructure, speeding, driving under the influence (DUIs), distracted driving, and lack of enforcement (Figure 14). Other identified issues included pavement condition, lack of streetlights, lack of turn lanes on highways, inadequate bicycle lanes and pedestrian crossings on bridges, faded pavement markers, and unlicensed drivers.
Figure 14: Public Survey Areas of Concern
Figure 13: Public Website Interactive Map
City of Crescent City
Local Road Safety Plan – June 2022 [21]
5.4 Public Workshop
A joint public workshop was hosted through the Zoom platform on February 15, 2022 to discuss details about the Crescent City and Del Norte County LRSPs. This workshop updated the public with the work completed on the plans and provided time at the end of the presentation for the attendees to address any questions or concerns they had. A summary from this workshop is included in Appendix A. Stakeholder and Public Input.
Public-Identified Strategies
Areas with high densities of interactive map comments within the City of Crescent City included areas along Front St, along 9th St, along A St, on 5th St at US 101, E Cooper Ave at US 101 and on H St near 11th St. Repaving Front Street in its entirety was mentioned multiple times. Lack of infrastructure was also identified by many as a safety concern. Public comments suggested building additional sidewalks, adding additional street lighting, adding more bike lanes and multi-use paths, and increasing overall safety as some main priorities for improvements to encourage alternate modes of travel.
6. Identify Strategies
Through coordination and feedback from the City of Crescent City, LRSP stakeholder working group, and public outreach, safety projects and strategies were identified for the Local Road Safety Plan.
The LRSP references specific location engineering projects and systemic safety applications. In addition, safety strategies and projects that address the other E’s to include Enforcement, Education, Emergency Response, and Emerging Technologies will be discussed below.
6.1 Engineering Strategies
Recommended countermeasures for the priority locations were chosen per the most recent Caltrans, Local Roadway Safety Manual (Version 1.5), April 2020, guidance from the City and stakeholders on preferred countermeasures, crash characteristics, and observations from Google Maps.
Collisions from the past five years (2016-2020) were used to determine crash characteristics for priority intersections and segments throughout the City, including along US 101 within Caltrans jurisdiction. Based on these characteristics, the most suitable countermeasures were developed.
Intersection Projects
The locations and characteristics of the 5 priority intersections are shown in Table 6 below. The countermeasures recommended for these locations are presented in Table 7.
City of Crescent City
Local Road Safety Plan – June 2022 [22]
Table 6: Priority Intersection Characteristics
Crash Characteristics
Location Control
Total Crashes
Top Type
of
Collision
(Number of
Collisions)
Top
Violation
Category
(Number of
Collisions)
Fatal + Severe Injury
% Night
Wet
Pedestrian
Pedestrian Not in
Crosswalk
Bicycle
Ran Off Road
Involv. w/Fixed Object
Alcohol Involved
J St/7th St TWSC 1 Broadside
(1)
Auto (R/W)
(1) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
H St/8th St Two-way
Stop Control
(TWSC)
2 Sideswipe
(1), Other
(1)
Unsafe
backing (1),
Unknown (1)
0 50% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gary St/Becky
Ct Uncontrolled 1 Overturned (1)
Unsafe
speed (1) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
A St./Essex St TWSC 1 Hit-object
(1)
Unsafe
Speed (1) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
Breen
St/Coolidge
Ave
TWSC 1 Hit-object
(1)
Unsafe
Speed (1) 0 100% 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
Some of the proposed Intersection Countermeasures for City Roadways are highlighted below:
Install/upgrade larger or additional stop signs or other intersection warning/regulatory signs • J Street / 7th Street
• H Street / 8th Street
Upgrade intersection pavement markings
• J Street / 7th Street
• H Street / 8th Street
Improve sight distance to intersection (Clear Sight Triangles) • J Street / 7th Street
• Breen Street / Coolidge Avenue
Update school warning sign and install dynamic/variable speed warning signs • Gary Street / Becky Court
City of Crescent City
Local Road Safety Plan – June 2022 [23]
Table 7: Recommended Countermeasures for Priority Intersections Segment Projects
From 2016 to 2020 a total of 8 collisions were reported on City roadway segments (non-intersection related).
Priority segments and their crash characteristics for the City are displayed in Table 8 below. The countermeasures recommended for these locations are presented in Table 9.
City of Crescent City
Local Road Safety Plan – June 2022 [24]
Table 8: Priority Segments Characteristics
Crash Characteristics
Primary
Road Limits
Length (mi)
Total Crashes
Top Type
of
Collision
(Number of
Collisions)
Top
Violation
Category
(Number of
Collisions)
Fatal + Severe Injury
% Night
Wet
Pedestrian
Pedestrian Not in
Crosswalk
Bicycle
Ran Off Road
Involv. w/Fixed Object
Alcohol Involved
E Cooper
Ave
Cemetery
Rd to US
101
0.13 1 Broadside
(1)
Automobile
Right of
Way (1)
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
US 101
Front St to
Elk Valley
Rd
0.41 4 Broadside
(2)
Automobile
Right of
Way (1),
Unsafe
speed (1),
Unsafe
starting or
backing (1)
1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0
US 101 E Cooper
Ave to 9th St 0.41 4 Sideswipe
(1)
Unsafe lane
change (1) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Table 9: Recommended Countermeasures for Priority Segments Systemic Countermeasures
When selecting countermeasures, just focusing on locations with current collision issues is a reactive approach to roadway safety planning. A reactive approach targets recent hot-spots and specific problems that are associated with these locations. As a result, locations with low traffic volumes but similar safety issues as hot spot locations, are not addressed. To mitigate collisions in both a reactive and proactive approach, Caltrans’ Local Roadway Safety Manual suggests agencies utilize a comprehensive approach that includes systemic and hot spot location improvements in developing a safety plan.
City of Crescent City
Local Road Safety Plan – June 2022 [25]
There are six Citywide Recommended Countermeasures that include adding intersection lighting, installing additional intersection warning/regulatory signs, upgrading intersection pavement markers, installing or upgrading pedestrian crossings at uncontrolled locations, enhanced pedestrian safety features, install or upgrade signs with new florescent sheeting, and installing sidewalks or pathways. More information can be seen in Table 10 below.
Table 10: Systemic Countermeasures
One of the roadways that is identified in City’s Economic Development Strategic Action Plan is Front Street. Phase 1 of Front Street Improvements is already constructed between B Street to G Street. The City is in the process of acquiring funding for Phase 2 of the project. Currently, the unimproved segment of Front Street is 4-lane roadway with a painted median leading to a long pedestrian crossing distance. Systemic countermeasures mentioned above can be implemented to reduce collision risks. There are some limitations to the application of Countermeasure R22 – Install/Upgrade signs with new fluorescent sheeting as mentioned in the LRSM:
This CM only applies to crashes occurring within the influence area of the new/upgraded signs. This CM is not intended for maintenance upgrades of street-name, parking, guide, or any other signs without a primary focus on roadway safety. This CM is not eligible unless it is done as part of a larger sign audit project, including the study of:
City of Crescent City
Local Road Safety Plan – June 2022 [26]
1) the existing signs' locations, sizes, and information per MUTCD standards, 2) missing signs per MUTCD standards, and
3) sign retroreflectivity.
The overall sign audit scope (or a special exception from the HSIP program manager) must be documented in the Narrative Questions in the application. Based on the scope of the project/audit, it may be appropriate to combine other CMs in the B/C calculation.
Pedestrian crossing enhancements and bicycle safety improvements are fundable through set-aside funding in the HSIP grant program. Improvements for these can qualify for funding without having prior collision history.
Systemic countermeasures regarding pedestrian crossings (NS20PB, NS21PB, NS22PB and R35PB) can be implemented at crossing locations at schools, downtown, and other mid-block locations.
Projects Suggested through Public Input
The interactive map tool on the public website for the plan gathered many suggestions from residents of the County for areas of improvement. These suggestions were summarized and are shown in Table 11 below.
Table 11: Project Recommendations from Public Outreach
Suggestion Location (*Location is either fully/partially not in City jurisdiction) Improve Pavement Quality
Front Street
K Street
West Harding Street*
2nd Street at A Street
E Essex Street
8th Street
5th Street east of M (Hwy 101)
Highway 101 side streets
Wendell Street at W 8th Street
Improve Vegetation Maintenance E Essex Street
Improve Turning
E Cooper Avenue
H Street from 9th Street to Pacific Avenue
H Street at Pacific Avenue*
Arlington Drive at W Washington Blvd*
Install/ Upgrade pedestrian facilities
H Street at Pacific Avenue*
H Street from 9th Street to Pacific Avenue
3rd Street at G Street
A Street
Highway 101 at Cooper Avenue
10th Street at B Street
Evaluate speed limit and/or implement speed
mitigation measures
H Street from 9th Street to Pacific Avenue
9th Street at D Street
Highway 101 at Cooper Avenue
Improve Signage Citywide
A Street between E Condor Street and 10th Street
Improve Lighting
I Street from Front Street to 3rd Street
Pacific Avenue*
Wendell Street at W 8th Street
City of Crescent City
Local Road Safety Plan – June 2022 [27]
6.2 Non-Engineering Strategies
A comprehensive approach to selecting countermeasure recognizes that not all safety issues can be addressed through infrastructure improvements. The comprehensive approach to safety involves the 5 E’s of traffic safety.
Besides engineering safety countermeasures, it is important to recommend safety countermeasures to coincide with the other safety E’s.
7. Prioritize and Incorporate Strategies
7.1 Funding Sources
Funding opportunities can come through grant funding such as HSIP, Active Transportation Program (ATP), and other state and federally funded grants. It should be noted that the Active Transportation Program (ATP) funding is very competitive and typically awarded for larger projects in high-density communities but does consider disadvantaged communities. With these constraints, it may be difficult for the City of Crescent City to submit a competitive project. Crescent City can also look for opportunities to incorporate safety enhancements with the Capital Improvement Program. However, it is noted that funding is very limited and typically used from roadway paving.
Each HSIP cycle has available project funding for Benefit to Cost Ratio (BCR) and funding set-aside projects. BCR projects use expected benefit and estimated cost to determine eligibility and likelihood for receiving funding. The expected benefit is determined using the crash history and the predicted collision reduction from the recommended countermeasures. Since there were a limited number of collisions within the City and the majority were low-severity, it is unlikely any of the projects could meet the minimum BCR for the majority of HSIP funding.
However, HSIP also provides funding set-aside projects that do not require a collision history. Per HSIP Cycle 11 City of Crescent City
Local Road Safety Plan – June 2022 [28]
call for projects released May 9, 2022, set-aside funding categories include guardrail upgrades, pedestrian crossing enhancements, installing edgelines, bike safety improvements, and tribes.
For funding for the non-engineering strategies, the California Office of Traffic Safety has resources that can be used by the City to help in traffic safety education for residents. Some campaigns highlighted in their website include impaired driving, distracted driving, pedestrian & bicycle safety, and speeding. The website provides educational materials, safety tips, facts, and resources to use in educating the public on traffic safety.
7.2 Prioritized Projects
As there were a limited number of collisions in the City with overall low-severity, it is difficult to prioritize specific intersection and segment projects. As such, it is recommended that the City focus on systemic countermeasures in order to improve overall safety. Based on stakeholder, public, and City recommendations, the following is a prioritized list of systemic countermeasures for the City.
1. Upgrade intersection pavement markings.
2. Install/upgrade larger or additional stop signs or other intersection warning/regulatory signs.
3. Install/upgrade pedestrian crossing (with enhanced safety features).
4. Install sidewalk/pathway (to avoid walking along roadway).
Pedestrian crossing enhancements and bicycle safety improvements are fundable through set-aside funding in the HSIP grant program. Improvements for these can qualify for funding without having prior collision history.
Systemic countermeasures regarding pedestrian crossings can be implemented at crossing locations at schools, downtown, and other mid-block locations.
8. Evaluation Process
To evaluate the success of this plan, yearly collision analysis, along with requests for public feedback, can take place and be compared to the established goals.
Goal 1: Create a safe, livable, healthy, and welcoming community by developing a roadway safety plan that targets Crescent City’s transportation and roadway safety needs Measure of success: A Local Road Safety Plan developed with stakeholder and community engagement that is updated and adopted every 5 years.
Goal 2: Reduce fatal and injury collisions Citywide by increased maintenance, grant funded projects, and increased education and enforcement
Measure(s) of success: A downward trend of fatal and injury collisions as a result of safety improvement projects and/or education and enforcement efforts. Obtain grant funds including a potential HSIP grant for recommended safety countermeasures. Increased education and enforcement including collaboration with CHP, the Crescent City Police Department and the Del Norte County Sherriff’s Office to increase enforcement in areas with speeding violations or areas of concern.
Goal 3: Identify cost-effective countermeasures and safety investments that can be applied systemically (i.e., flashing yellow arrow, retroreflective backplates, leading pedestrian interval, etc.) City of Crescent City
Local Road Safety Plan – June 2022 [29]
Measure of success: Develop a list of countermeasures that can be implemented City wide and can easily be included in grant funding applications.
Goal 4: Reduce hit object and lane departures collisions by implementing safety countermeasures and strategies Measure of success: A measured reduction in hit object and lane departure collisions. To achieve this reduction: paint all pavement markings every other year where pavement markings are not thermoplastic or epoxy. Where pavement markings are thermoplastic or epoxy, rehabilitate pavement markings every ten years or as needed.
Goal 5: Improve multimodal transportation safety by expanding the City’s opportunities for non-motorized transportation infrastructure
Measure of success: Implement SB 743 to mitigate vehicle miles generated by development and promote improvements to active transportation facilities including bike trail and pedestrian path construction.
Goal 6: Improve safety around schools by increasing multimodal infrastructure, enhanced crossings, and education and enforcement
Measure of success: Encourage each school site from elementary to high school to develop and implement a school route plan for pedestrians consistent with the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Additionally, include provisions in the school route plan for active transportation users.
Goal 7: Reduce speeding and improper turning related collisions through engineering, enforcement, emerging technologies, and education strategies
Measure of Success: Within 5 years after implementing speed management strategies outlined in this plan, “Unsafe Speed” and “Improper Turning” will report less collisions.
9. Next Steps
The City of Crescent City plans to present the Local Road Safety Plan to the City Council for adoption in June 2022.
This safety plan will be a living document and will guide the City’s roadway safety needs for at least the next five years. It will be updated as needed and the goals will be monitored.
City of Crescent City
Local Road Safety Plan – June 2022 [30]
10. References
Recent/Planned Projects
City of Crescent City Front Street Storm Drain Project
https://www.crescentcity.org/departments/PublicWorks
City of Crescent City Sunset Circle Multi-Use Trail Project.
Traffic Data
City of Crescent City Collision Data, Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System, 2011-2020.
City of Crescent City Collision Data, Transportation Injury Mapping System, 2011-2020.
Plans/Manuals/Articles
“Developing Safety Plans, A Manual for Local Rural Road Owners”, Federal Highway Administration, March 2012, http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/local_rural/training/fhwasa12017/. 2020-2024 California’s Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP), “California Safe Roads: 2020-2024 Strategic Highway Safety Plan”, Caltrans.
“Local Roadway Safety, A Manual for California’s Local Road Owners”, Caltrans, Version 1.5, April 2020 “Highway Safety Manual”, American Association of State Highway Officials (AASHTO), 1st Edition, 2014 supplement.
“California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD)”, Revision 5, 2014.
County of Del Norte and City of Crescent City, Final Regional Systemic Safety Analysis Report. June 25, 2019.
City of Crescent City Economic Developmnet Startegic Action Plan, Adopted June 2021.
Websites
California Department of Transportation, “Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP)”, https://dot.ca.gov/programs/safety-programs/shsp.
California Department of Transportation, “Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP) and Systemic Safety Analysis Report Program (SSARP)”, https://dot.ca.gov/programs/local-assistance/fed-and-stateprograms/highway-safety-improvement-program/local-roadway-safety-plans.
California Department of Transportation, “HSIP Cycle 10”, https://dot.ca.gov/programs/localassistance/fed-and-state-programs/highway-safety-improvement-program/apply-now.
County of Del Norte Local Road Safety Plan, https://lrsp.mysocialpinpoint.com/delnorte.
Institute of Transportation Engineers, https://www.ite.org/technical-resources/topics/safe-systems/.
Surveys
Local Road Safety Plan Project Survey, https://lrsp.mysocialpinpoint.com/delnort APPENDIX A – STAKEHOLDER AND PUBLIC INPUT
Agenda
The Power of Commitment
12565978 / 12559663 | Del Norte Local Roadway Safety Plan / Crescent City Local Roadway Safety Plan 1 December 06, 2021
Project Del Norte Local Roadway Safety Plan /
Crescent City Local Roadway Safety
Plan
From Kathryn Kleinschmidt
Subject Stakeholder Working Group Meeting #1 Tel +1 805 858-3147 Date/Time December 6, 2021 from 1 p.m. to 3
p.m.
Project no. 12565978 / 12559663
1. Introductions
a. Background on stakeholder working group
b. Facilitators
c. Safety Champion/Project Manager for the City/County
d. LRSP Stakeholder Working Group members
i. Role and interest in serving on this committee
2. Background
a. Purpose of the LRSP
i. Focused Challenge Areas per Strategic Safety Highway Plan ii. Engages stakeholders representing all E’s and other local community stakeholders (neighboring jurisdictions, advocacy groups, and officials) in developing a plan of action to increase safety and create a prioritized list of projects b. LRSP Process
c. Plan updates
i. Living document that is updated as needed
ii. Official update every 5 years
iii. LRSP schedule for completion
3. Safety Projects
a. County of Del Norte
i. Elk Valley Cross Road Corridor Plan
ii. Elk Valley Road Multimodal Corridor Plan
b. City of Crescent City
i. Front Street Project
ii. Sunset Circle Multi-Use Trail Project
4. Data Analysis
a. Collision Data (2011-2020)
i. All Collisions in the County and the City
1. Intersection vs. Segment
2. Hot Spot Locations
3. Severity
4. Collision Type
ii. Fatal and Severe Injury Collision Locations
iii. Top Violation Categories
iv. Pedestrian Collisions
The Power of Commitment
12565978 / 12559663 | Del Norte Local Roadway Safety Plan / Crescent City Local Roadway Safety Plan 2 v. Bicycle Collisions
b. Top ranking intersections and segments
c. Identify the approach to evaluating collisions (spot, systemic, or comprehensive). i. Currently using a comprehensive approach
ii. Implement low-cost safety countermeasures systemically
5. Guiding Principles
a. Identify a vision, goals, and mission statement for the LRSP i. LRSP needs a vision, goals, and mission statement to guide the document ii. Identify countermeasures to correlate to emphasis area
1. Engineering, Enforcement, Emergency Response, Education, and Emerging Technologies (5Es)
6. Other Items to Discuss
a. Public Outreach
b. Next Meeting
i. Action Items
1. Complete survey for Vision, Mission, and Goals
2. Provide feedback on meeting topics
3. Participate in the public website
4. Share the public website
Agenda
The Power of Commitment
12565978 / 12559663 | Del Norte Local Roadway Safety Plan / Crescent City Local Roadway Safety Plan 1 December 08, 2021
Project Del Norte Local Roadway Safety Plan /
Crescent City Local Roadway Safety
Plan
From Kathryn Kleinschmidt
Subject Stakeholder Working Group Meeting #1 Tel +1 805 858-3147 Date/Time December 8, 2021 from 2 p.m. to 4
p.m.
Project no. 12565978 / 12559663
1. Introductions
a. Background on stakeholder working group
b. Facilitators
c. Safety Champion/Project Manager for the City/County
d. LRSP Stakeholder Working Group members
i. Role and interest in serving on this committee
2. Background
a. Purpose of the LRSP
i. Focused Challenge Areas per Strategic Safety Highway Plan ii. Engages stakeholders representing all E’s and other local community stakeholders (neighboring jurisdictions, advocacy groups, and officials) in developing a plan of action to increase safety and create a prioritized list of projects b. LRSP Process
c. Plan updates
i. Living document that is updated as needed
ii. Official update every 5 years
iii. LRSP schedule for completion
3. Safety Projects
a. County of Del Norte
i. Elk Valley Cross Road Corridor Plan
ii. Elk Valley Road Multimodal Corridor Plan
b. City of Crescent City
i. Front Street Project
ii. Sunset Circle Multi-Use Trail Project
4. Data Analysis
a. Collision Data (2011-2020)
i. All Collisions in the County and the City
1. Intersection vs. Segment
2. Hot Spot Locations
3. Severity
4. Collision Type
ii. Fatal and Severe Injury Collision Locations
iii. Top Violation Categories
iv. Pedestrian Collisions
The Power of Commitment
12565978 / 12559663 | Del Norte Local Roadway Safety Plan / Crescent City Local Roadway Safety Plan 2 v. Bicycle Collisions
b. Top ranking intersections and segments
c. Identify the approach to evaluating collisions (spot, systemic, or comprehensive). i. Currently using a comprehensive approach
ii. Implement low-cost safety countermeasures systemically
5. Guiding Principles
a. Identify a vision, goals, and mission statement for the LRSP i. LRSP needs a vision, goals, and mission statement to guide the document ii. Identify countermeasures to correlate to emphasis area
1. Engineering, Enforcement, Emergency Response, Education, and Emerging Technologies (5Es)
6. Other Items to Discuss
a. Public Outreach
b. Next Meeting
i. Action Items
1. Complete survey for Vision, Mission, and Goals
2. Provide feedback on meeting topics
3. Participate in the public website
4. Share the public website
Agenda
The Power of Commitment
12565978 / 12559663 | Del Norte Local Roadway Safety Plan / Crescent City Local Roadway Safety Plan 1 February 07, 2022
Project Del Norte Local Roadway Safety Plan /
Crescent City Local Roadway Safety
Plan
From Kathryn Kleinschmidt
Subject Stakeholder Working Group Meeting #2 Tel +1 805 858-3147 Date/Time February 7, 2022 from 2 p.m. to 4 p.m. Project no. 12565978 / 12559663
1. Introductions
a. Facilitators
b. Safety Champion/Project Manager for the County/City
c. LRSP Stakeholder Working Group members
2. 1st Meeting Summary
a. Meeting summary
i. Challenge/emphasis areas
ii. Sample mission, vision, and goals
iii. Collision analysis from past 10 years
b. Guiding principles
i. Finalize mission, vision, and goals
3. Recent Developments
a. Public website engagement
i. Overall engagement
ii. Summarized interactive map comments
iii. Summarized survey results
4. Safety Countermeasures
a. Methodology
b. Countermeasures for County roadways
i. Recent projects
ii. Priority locations
1. Intersection countermeasures
2. Segment countermeasures
iii. Systemic countermeasures
iv. Non-engineering strategies
v. Public suggestions
c. Countermeasures for City roadways
i. Recent projects
ii. Priority locations
1. Intersection countermeasures
2. Segment countermeasures
iii. Systemic countermeasures
iv. Non-engineering strategies
v. Public suggestions
The Power of Commitment
12565978 / 12559663 | Del Norte Local Roadway Safety Plan / Crescent City Local Roadway Safety Plan 2
5. Next Steps
a. Provide feedback on meeting topics
b. Public meeting on February 15, 2022 at 5 p.m.
c. Draft LRSP document
Request for Public Input:
We want to hear from you! Provide your input on the safety of the roadways in our community and learn more about
the Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP) by visiting the
following link before January 31, 2022.
Local Roadway Safety Plan
lrsp.mysocialpinpoint.com/delnorte
Jon Olson, PE
Director of Public Works
377 J St, Crescent City, CA 95531
[email protected]
(707) 464-9506, ext. 234
Want to participate in helping to
make YOUR local roads safer?
Scan this QR code to access the LRSP website, which
includes an interactive map, a survey, and project details.
Rosanna Bower, PE
Assistant County Engineer
981 H St, Suite 110, Crescent City, CA 95531
[email protected]
(707) 464-7229
For further information, contact:
County of Del Norte City of Crescent City
Join Us for a Public Meeting!
To discuss details about the Local Roadway Safety Plan
Short presentation followed by a Q&A
February 15, 2022 at 5:00 PM
Join online: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/86143469603
Or use the Zoom Webinar ID: 861 4346 9603
Or call: (669) 900 6833
Note: For call-in only attendees, you can mute/unmute by pressing *6 and raise your hand by pressing *9.
Local Roadway Safety Plan
Jon Olson, PE
Director of Public Works
377 J St, Crescent City, CA 95531
[email protected]
(707) 464-9506, ext. 234
Want to participate in helping to make YOUR
local roads safer?
Scan this QR code to access the LRSP website, which includes an interactive map, a survey, and project details. You can also navigate to lrsp.mysocialpinpoint.com/delnorte using your web browser.
Rosanna Bower, PE
Assistant County Engineer
981 H St, Suite 110, Crescent City, CA 95531
[email protected]
(707) 464-7229
County of Del Norte City of Crescent City
ID Created on Type Comment Up Votes Down Votes Latitude Longitude View on map Within City? Location 4 12/22/2021 8:01 Driving Comment Front Street from H St. to Hwy 101 north needs to be fixed. Too many potholes and dips in the road. I wonder what tourists think of this road that leads to the Battery Point Lighthouse and Beachfront Park?? 15 0 41.751409 -124.194689 https://lrsp.mysocial pinpoint.com/delnor te/map#/marker/26 7027 Crescent City Front Street 5 12/22/2021 8:05 Driving Comment K Street from Front Street to Third Street. The roadway has many dips and potholes and needs to be fixed. This would help drivers and parade entries in our many parades that travel down K Street. 6 0 41.752492 -124.194067 https://lrsp.mysocial pinpoint.com/delnor te/map#/marker/26 7029 Crescent City K Street 6 12/22/2021 8:17 Driving Comment
West Harding Street between El Dorado Street and Northcrest Drive. Many, many potholes, broken asphalt, crack sealing that just needs to be replaced with releveled surface and new asphalt or asphalt/concrete. When cars are parked along the side of the street, through traffic CANNOT avoid the potholes, etc. which isn't good for one's car alignment or tires. 7 0 41.767315 -124.201502
https://lrsp.mysocial
pinpoint.com/delnorte/map#/marker/267030
Crescent City
West Harding
Street
17 12/27/2021 18:06 Driving Comment Please finish Front St. It's a rough road. It needs to be leveled out and resurfaced. For a city street that's terrible. 13 0 41.751753 -124.193187 https://lrsp.mysocial
pinpoint.com/delnorte/map#/marker/267558
Crescent City Front Street
18 12/27/2021 18:10 Driving Comment Second & A street needs to be fixed. The surface of the road is in very bad condition. 7 0 41.747832 -124.203379 https://lrsp.mysocial
pinpoint.com/delnorte/map#/marker/267559
Crescent City
2nd Street at A
Street
19 12/30/2021 17:26 Driving Comment big pothole on E essex. bushes at curb obstructing view of vehicles turning onto A street from E. essex 2 0 41.755661 -124.210181 https://lrsp.mysocial
pinpoint.com/delnorte/map#/marker/268320
Crescent City E Essex Street
20 12/30/2021 17:27 Driving Comment people pulling out of starbucks, and homedepot almost cause accident every time I drive down cooper... 4 0 41.761695 -124.198487 https://lrsp.mysocial
pinpoint.com/delnorte/map#/marker/268321
Crescent City
E Cooper
Avenue
21 12/30/2021 17:29 Driving Comment how come front street only got repaved in front of sea quake? the whole street needs work 13 0 41.750076 -124.197006 https://lrsp.mysocial
pinpoint.com/delnorte/map#/marker/268322
Crescent City Front Street
23 1/4/2022 23:28 Driving Comment
Drivers use H St., from 9th through the turn onto Pacific and from Pacific to the stop sign at 9th as a super speedway with nothing in the way to slow them down. There is a LOT of pedestrians in this area, especially during sporting events. I have witnessed many near misses with a speeding vehicle involving Children and adults. I believe there should be a three way stop at the junction of Pacific/H St/ Meridian. Also allowing east bound traffic on Pacific to turn left on Meridian . 4 2 41.756851 -124.202478
https://lrsp.mysocial
pinpoint.com/delnorte/map#/marker/268955
Crescent City
H Street from 9th
Street to Pacific
Avenue
24 1/4/2022 23:38 Driving Comment
I believe there should be a three way stop at the junction of Pacific/H St/ Meridian. Also allowing east bound traffic on Pacific to turn left (north) on Meridian. Making access to Cooper-highway more convenient. Also, This would decrease speeding drivers from taking these turns too fast and would eliminate the “Pacific/H St speedway. Also would increase safety for the many pedestrians in this area, especially during the multitude of sporting events at the ball park and gym. 2 2 41.758028 -124.203701
https://lrsp.mysocial
pinpoint.com/delnorte/map#/marker/268956
Crescent City
H Street at
Pacific Avenue*
25 1/4/2022 23:41 Pedestrian Comment Please see comments for driving in same location 1 0 41.757923 -124.203508 https://lrsp.mysocial
pinpoint.com/delnorte/map#/marker/268957
Crescent City
H Street at
Pacific Avenue*
26 1/4/2022 23:43 Pedestrian Comment Please see driving comment for same location 0 0 41.757059 -124.202628 https://lrsp.mysocial
pinpoint.com/delnorte/map#/marker/268958
Crescent City
H Street from 9th
Street to Pacific
Avenue
ID Created on Type Comment Up Votes Down Votes Latitude Longitude View on map Within City? Location 27 1/4/2022 23:52 Driving Comment
There is no posted speed limit signs anywhere on H St. that I have seen. It is a mix of residential and commercial so is the speed limit 25 or 35? Believe most people drive it at 45mph + going north and south between Pacific and 9th St. my neighbor was hit by a truck while walking her dog. PLEASE, make the needed improvements and chaotic make this area safe for the many pedestrians that travel it daily and especially during the sporting events at the ball field and gym. 2 0 41.755274 -124.201641
https://lrsp.mysocial
pinpoint.com/delnorte/map#/marker/268959
Crescent City
H Street from 9th
Street to Pacific
Avenue
28 1/5/2022 0:15 Driving Comment
Each intersection in the city should have street signs identifying the names of the streets that are intersecting . There are too many intersections that are lacking street identification signs. Why? I’ve never seen a city with so many missing street name signs. I don’t believe there is any excuse for this to be overlooked. Please label each intersection with the appropriate identifying signage and while you’re at it, add some speed limit signs along these roads. These would be very helpful. 5 1 41.756299 -124.196534
https://lrsp.mysocial
pinpoint.com/delnorte/map#/marker/268960
Crescent City Citywide
29 1/5/2022 0:20 Driving Comment This comment is for all of 8th St. The city should be ashamed by the condition of this road!!! Please take a drive on 8th St and see for yourself. I feel so bad for the residents on this road. 2 0 41.75425 -124.20265 https://lrsp.mysocial pinpoint.com/delnor te/map#/marker/26 8961 Crescent City 8th Street 31 1/5/2022 13:47 Driving Comment
5th Street, east from M Street, needs to be leveled and repaved with attention paid to the steepness of the drainage channel along the curbs and driveways in and out of the Safeway parking lot and Rite Aid parking lot. I am so tired of scraping the bottom front of my vehicle when I exit both parking lots. Especially bad is the rodeway and driveway into and out of Safeway, nearest to the Safeway building itself. 6 0 41.756322 -124.193766
https://lrsp.mysocial
pinpoint.com/delnorte/map#/marker/269103
Crescent City
5th Street east of
M (Hwy 101)
32 1/5/2022 15:10 Driving Comment Unsafe speed...showing off. Offensively and intentional noisy vehicles. No enforcement...children often present. 1 0 41.754107 -124.204972 https://lrsp.mysocial
pinpoint.com/delnorte/map#/marker/269119
Crescent City
9th Street at D
Street
36 1/6/2022 11:59 Driving Comment "A" Street from 2nd St to Pacific Avenue needs to be repaved! It is a driving hazard! 2 0 41.748187 -124.203563 https://lrsp.mysocial
pinpoint.com/delnorte/map#/marker/269276
Crescent City
2nd Street at A
Street
42 1/6/2022 12:51 Driving Comment The road is full of potholes and is very hard to drive on. 3 0 41.752851 -124.205858 https://lrsp.mysocial
pinpoint.com/delnorte/map#/marker/269301
Crescent City 8th Street
45 1/6/2022 13:02 Driving Comment Drivers coming off Arlington and in and out of DNHS have multiple near misses every school morning. Instead of yielding, a center turning lane could help. 2 0 41.772185 -124.210138 https://lrsp.mysocial
pinpoint.com/delnorte/map#/marker/269308
Crescent City
Arlington Drive at
W Washington
Blvd*
47 1/6/2022 13:09 Driving Comment Street lights have not worked in years. The lighting is terrible and it is unsafe at night. 1 0 41.752143 -124.196525 https://lrsp.mysocial
pinpoint.com/delnorte/map#/marker/269310
Crescent City
I Street from
Front Street to
3rd Street
49 1/6/2022 13:49 Driving Comment Many of the streets that run parallel to the highway need repaving, not just patching once in a decade. 2 0 41.751025 -124.200697 https://lrsp.mysocial
pinpoint.com/delnorte/map#/marker/269316
Crescent City
Highway 101
side streets
50 1/6/2022 13:50 Driving Comment Front street from 101 to H St needs repair so drastically. Why it has been left to a state of such disrepair is appalling. 4 0 41.752324 -124.193546 https://lrsp.mysocial
pinpoint.com/delnorte/map#/marker/269317
Crescent City Front Street
ID Created on Type Comment Up Votes Down Votes Latitude Longitude View on map Within City? Location 51 1/6/2022 13:53 Pedestrian Comment The sidewalk stops for one block each on opposing sides of the street. It makes for poor walkability ( I don't want to bit hit by a car or splashed by water when the streets are wet and a car drives too close) 2 0 41.751853 -124.19838 https://lrsp.mysocial pinpoint.com/delnor te/map#/marker/26 9318 Crescent City 3rd Street at G Street 52 1/6/2022 13:56 Pedestrian Comment It's very dark at night. Unsafe and scary! This area needs street lamps! 2 0 41.7576 -124.20295 https://lrsp.mysocial
pinpoint.com/delnorte/map#/marker/269321
Crescent City
H Street from 9th
Street to Pacific
Avenue
58 1/6/2022 15:56 Pedestrian Comment
Sidewalks they length of A street are intermittent and not ADA compliant. Placement of electric poles and light poles make it impossible to navigate what little sidewalk there is with a wheelchair. I see folks I. Wheel chair going down the middle of the street. It is a lawsuit waiting to happen. Lots of speeding on A st. Very dangerous to cross. 1 0 41.75389 -124.20898
https://lrsp.mysocial
pinpoint.com/delnorte/map#/marker/269364
Crescent City A Street
73 1/7/2022 9:21 Driving Comment so dark at night, we need street lights 2 0 41.757871 -124.211383 https://lrsp.mysocial
pinpoint.com/delnorte/map#/marker/269454
Crescent City Pacific Avenue*
75 1/8/2022 19:25 Pedestrian Comment Have almost been hit several times, crossing Hwy 101 at Cooper. I use the signal, but even when the sign says "WALK," vehicles race through this intersection without even seeing pedestrians. 0 0 41.761647 -124.197425 https://lrsp.mysocial pinpoint.com/delnor te/map#/marker/26 9704 Crescent City Highway 101 at Cooper Avenue 79 1/13/2022 22:31 Driving Comment
There are several potholes on this block, including one that is in front of my driveway that is big enough to chew up the front end of my car every time I back out! There is also a faulty streetlamp on this block that is constantly cycling on and off and makes it hard to see and is distracting to drive. 0 0 41.751984 -124.208481
https://lrsp.mysocial
pinpoint.com/delnorte/map#/marker/270885
Crescent City
Wendell Street at
W 8th Street
80 1/13/2022 22:33 Driving Comment There is a rather large dip in the road here, and people often race down our block so they can "catch air" bouncing over that dip. It makes it unsafe for kids, pedestrians and people living in our area. 0 0 41.751689 -124.208212 https://lrsp.mysocial pinpoint.com/delnor te/map#/marker/27 0886 Crescent City Wendell Street at W 8th Street81 1/13/2022 22:37 Transit Comment There is no bus stop sign in front of the church on A street. Just a pole. 0 0 41.753971 -124.209055 https://lrsp.mysocial
pinpoint.com/delnorte/map#/marker/270887
Crescent City
A Street between
E Condor Street
and 10th Street
82 1/13/2022 22:39 Pedestrian Comment the sidewalk is very uneven here, full of trip hazards 0 0 41.753898 -124.207671 https://lrsp.mysocial
pinpoint.com/delnorte/map#/marker/270888
Crescent City
10th Street at B
Street
APPENDIX B – COLLISION DATA
Year Primary Road Secondary Road
Collision Severity
# of Fatalities
# of Injuries
Violation Category
Type of Collision
Pedestrian Involved
Bicycle Involved
Motorcycle Involved
2011 RT 101 N ST 4 0 1 Improper Turning Broadside Y2011 M ST 4TH ST 4 0 2 Following Too Closely Rear End2011 RT 101 NORTHCREST DR 4 0 1 - Vehicle/Pedestrian Y2011 9TH ST H ST 3 0 1 Pedestrian Right of Way Vehicle/Pedestrian Y2011 H ST 3RD ST 4 0 1 - Rear End2011 M ST 7TH ST 4 0 1 Improper Turning Sideswipe2011 RT 101 COOPER AV 3 0 1 - Other Y2011 9TH ST J ST 4 0 2 Following Too Closely Rear End2011 A ST 5TH ST 3 0 1 Unsafe Speed Rear End2011 B ST BATTERY ST 2 0 1 Unsafe Speed Vehicle/Pedestrian Y2011 M ST 9TH ST 3 0 1 Traffic Signals and Signs Sideswipe Y2011 L ST 3RD ST 4 0 1 Automobile Right of Way Broadside2011 6TH ST WENDELL ST 4 0 1 - -2011 L ST 9TH ST 4 0 2 Traffic Signals and Signs Broadside2011 RT 101 COOPER AV 4 0 2 - Rear End2012 3RD ST L ST 4 0 1 Other Hazardous Violation Other Y2012 L ST 5TH ST 4 0 2 Traffic Signals and Signs Broadside2012 L ST 3RD ST 2 0 2 Traffic Signals and Signs Broadside2012 M ST 7TH ST 4 0 1 Following Too Closely Rear End Y2012 NORTHCREST DR RT 101 0 0 0 Unsafe Starting or Backing Rear End2012 FRONT ST H ST 3 0 1 Improper Turning Head-On Y2013 WILSON AV DOUGLAS ST 0 0 0 Unsafe Speed Broadside2013 RT 101 NORTHCREST DR 0 0 0 Unsafe Speed Hit Object2013 5TH ST C ST 0 0 0 Traffic Signals and Signs Broadside2013 M ST/US 101 FRONT ST 3 0 1 - Vehicle/Pedestrian Y2015 B ST FRONT ST 0 0 0 Unsafe Speed Hit Object2015 WILLIAMS DR UNITED STATES HIGHWAY 101 0 0 0 DUI/BUI Rear End2015 1198 WILLIAMS DRIVE UNITED STATES HIGHWAY 101 0 0 0 Other Than Driver/Ped Hit Object2016 H ST 8TH ST 4 0 1 - Sideswipe2016 J ST 7TH ST 0 0 0 Automobile Right of Way Broadside2016 US101 ELK VALLEY RD 0 0 0 Automobile Right of Way Broadside2017 RT 101 ELK VALLEY RD 1 1 0 - Vehicle/Pedestrian Y2017 US-101 HUSTON ST 4 0 1 Unsafe Starting or Backing Broadside Y2019 US-101 COOPER AVE. 3 0 1 Unsafe Lane Change Sideswipe2019 GARY STREET BECKY STREET 3 0 1 Unsafe Speed Overturned Y2019 COOPER AVENUE US-101 0 0 0 Automobile Right of Way Broadside Year Primary Road Secondary Road
Collision Severity
# of Fatalities
# of Injuries
Violation Category
Type of Collision
Pedestrian Involved
Bicycle Involved
Motorcycle Involved
2019 H ST 8TH ST 0 0 0 Unsafe Starting or Backing Other2020 US-101 S/B FRONT ST 0 0 0 Unsafe Speed Hit Object2020 COOLIDGE AVENUE BREEN STREET 0 0 0 Unsafe Speed Hit Object2020 A ST W. ESSEX ST. 0 0 0 Unsafe Speed Hit Object APPENDIX C – FIELD RECONNAISSANCE
Crescent City and Del Norte County LRSP Site Visits
Road Segment/Intersection:
Highway 101 at Timbers Blvd
Date:
02/23/2022
Time:
10:00
Recommended Countermeasures:
None. Site visit based on public comment.
Notes:
Sidewalk is not complete up to intersection. No existing sidewalk along Highway 101 in either direction. No existing turn lanes on Highway 101. Timber Blvd dead ends just west of Dollar General. No cross traffic from east of Highway 101 (property on east side is private and gated).
Road Segment/Intersection:
S. Fred D. Haight Road near house number 465
Date:
02/23/2022
Time:
10:15
Recommended Countermeasures:
Install delineators, reflectors, and/or object markers. Install edge-lines and centerlines. DUI enforcement.
Notes:
Narrow to no shoulder. Existing center and side lines are faded. Driveways come out on to main road and irregular intervals. No apparent speed calming measures. Tractor seen on roadway.
Road Segment/Intersection:
Lake Earl Drive at Redwood Elementary School
Date:
02/23/2022
Time:
10:30
Recommended Countermeasures:
At Redhawk Lane just north of school: Monitor location over next five years.
Notes:
Two lanes of one way traffic exist through school parking lot. Existing turn lane for northbound traffic on Lake Earl Drive. No separate turn lane for southbound traffic. No sidewalks present on Lake Earl. Existing crosswalk with signage near school parking lot exit to the south. Approximate 6 ft shoulder on either side of Lake Earl near school.
Road Segment/Intersection:
Elk Valley Crossroad at Cunningham Ln (near Sunset HS)
Date:
02/23/2022
Time:
10:50
Recommended Countermeasures:
None. Site visit based on public comment.
Notes:
No stop pavement marking on Cunningham Ln. Low visibility turning right onto Elk Valley Crossroad. Narrow shoulders. Visible drainage issues along roadway. High speed traffic observed on Elk Valley Crossroad near Sunset HS. No visible markings or signage for school zone/ intersection.
Road Segment/Intersection:
Kings Valley Road at Highway 199
Date:
02/23/2022
Time:
11:05
Recommended Countermeasures:
For Kings Valley Road: New/ upgraded signs. Speed warning signs. Widen shoulder. Install delineators. Install edge lines.
Notes:
Narrow shoulders along all roadways. Existing markings are clear but there are a lot of them which makes it difficult to tell where lanes are. Crossing Highway 199 from north to south there is dip before traveling slightly uphill. High speed westbound traffic on Highway 199 (traveling downhill likely increases speed in this area).
Kings Valley Road is narrow with limited to no shoulder.
Road Segment/Intersection:
Elk Valley Road at Parkway Drive
Date:
02/23/2022
Time:
11:15
Recommended Countermeasures:
For Parkway Dr: Road segment recently went through safety updates and should be monitored to track improvement.
Notes:
Existing bike lanes on Parkway. Narrow shoulders on Elk Valley Crossroad where it meets Parkway Dr. No merging lane for Elk Valley Crossroad traffic turning left onto Parkway Dr which then merges quickly with Elk Valley Rd traffic turning right onto Parkway (all northbound). No edge lines on small connector between Elk Valley Road and Parkway (connecting with Elk Valley Crossroad).
Road Segment/Intersection:
Parkway Drive at Washington Blvd
Date:
02/23/2022
Time:
11:28
Recommended Countermeasures:
Roundabout or upgrade signs and intersection markings.
Notes:
Existing approximate 5 foot sidewalk by DMV parking lot. Existing bike lanes on Parkway Dr. Center turn land on Parkway before and after intersection. Raised cement/ asphalt island has limited markings or object markers which may make it difficult to see at night. Parkway Dr traffic does not stop.
Road Segment/Intersection:
E. Washington Blvd at Summer Lane
Date:
02/23/2022
Time:
11:45
Recommended Countermeasures:
Improve signal hardware.
Notes:
Traffic coming from ACE and WalMart parking lots. Existing sidewalks along Summer Ln. Crosswalk pavement markings are faded. No sidewalk on south side of E. Washington Blvd (sidewalk to west starting at 785 E. Washington). Push button crosswalk lights with count down timer. Observed limited traffic coming from Summer Lane (mostly vehicles coming out of WalMart parking lot).
Road Segment/Intersection:
E. Washington Blvd at Northcrest Drive
Date:
02/23/2022
Time:
11:55
Recommended Countermeasures:
Improve signal hardware. Provide advanced dilemma zone. Install vehicle/ bicycle detection system.
Notes:
Four way signaled intersection. Push button crosswalks. ADA sidewalks/ curb could be updated to create easier use. Pavement markings are fading.
Road Segment/Intersection:
E. Washington at Arlington Drive
Date:
02/23/2022
Time:
12:05
Recommended Countermeasures:
None. Site visit based on public comment.
Notes:
Sidewalk does not continue down Arlington to high school. No edge lines present on Arlington Dr. Existing four-way signaled traffic stop. Existing pavement markings are fading/ chipping away. Westbound E.
Washington sidewalk stops just after light. No bike lane markings present at intersection.
Road Segment/Intersection:
Butte Street from Keller to E. Macken
Date:
02/23/2022
Time:
12:25
Recommended Countermeasures:
At E. Macken: evaluate conversion to all way stop or; upgrade signs and crosswalks.
Notes:
No pavement markings along much of Butte St. No existing curb or sidewalk along majority of roadway. Deep drainage channel along western edge of road. Edge of pavement is deteriorating in some locations (observed near Childs Ave.
Road Segment/Intersection:
H Street at 10th Street
Date:
02/23/2022
Time:
12:30
Recommended Countermeasures:
For H and 8th: Upgrade signs and pavement markings/ Re-evaluate parking near intersection and stop sign positions.
Notes:
Sidewalk incomplete near 10th Street. Pavement markings are fading. Uneven sidewalk. Existing parking and street name signs are present.
Road Segment/Intersection:
Front Street
Date:
02/23/2022
Time:
14:30
Recommended Countermeasures:
None. Site visit based on public comment.
Notes:
Near E Street: roadway has recently been upgraded. Two lanes of traffic with separated parking along park.
Short crosswalk distance. Even pavement with clear markings.
Near Play Street: Four lanes of traffic with a center turn lane. Existing crosswalks are long and, in some places, uneven. Uneven pavement with multiple dips in roadway on southwest corner of intersection near park.
Pavement markings are fading. Existing sidewalk along park is wide and allows room for multiple users. Street pavement quality is deteriorating.
Road Segment/Intersection:
Elk Valley Road at Howland Hill Road
Date:
02/23/2022
Time:
15:30
Recommended Countermeasures:
Install street lighting and improve sight triangles or install a roundabout.
Notes:
Elk Valley traffic does not stop. Stop sign on Howland Hill is faded and likely non-reflective. Pavement markings are faded. No bike lane markings at intersection (existing markings further east on Howland Hill).
High speed traffic observed coming off of Elk Valley onto Howland Hill.
Road Segment/Intersection:
Howland Hill Road at Humboldt Road
Date:
02/23/2022
Time:
15:40
Recommended Countermeasures:
Install/ upgrade signs. Install/ upgrade pedestrian crossings.
Notes:
Narrow shoulders. Existing sidewalk in front of tribal office does not connect to crosswalk across Howland Hill. No existing intersection lighting. Limited crosswalk signage. Bike lane and crosswalk pavement markings are very faded. No sidewalk along Humboldt Road.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
TO: MAYOR GREENOUGH AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ERIC WIER, CITY MANAGER
BY: JON OLSON, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
MARTHA D. RICE, CITY ATTORNEY
DATE: JUNE 20, 2022
SUBJECT: SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WITH REGIONAL WATER QUALITY
CONTROL BOARD (RWQCB) FOR WWTP EFFLUENT LIMITATION
EXCEEDANCES
______________________________________________________________________
RECOMMENDATION
• Approve and adopt Resolution No. 2022-42, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CRESCENT CITY APPROVING A SETTLEMENT
AGREEMENT WITH THE REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD (ORDER R1-2022-0021)
BACKGROUND
The City owns the Wastewater Treatment Plant located at 210 Battery Street, Crescent City. The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program regulates wastewater discharges to surface waters pursuant to the federal Clean Water Act and California’s Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act. In California, NPDES permits are also referred to as Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs). The City discharges treated wastewater to the Pacific Ocean under NPDES permit no. CA0022756 issued by the North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board. The permit contains specific requirements that limit the pollutants in discharges and requires monitoring to ensure that the discharges meet those requirements. All exceedances of permit constituent limits are self-reported to the State. Periodically, the RWQCB will review reported exceedances and evaluate applicable fines (per statute). In small communities, the RWQCB is authorized to negotiate an agreement with the discharger (City) to put the money toward projects that will address the cause of violations rather than simply paying fines (referred to as compliance projects).
The RWQCB recently conducted a review of the period September 15, 2015 and April 15, 2022 finding 20 total violations for exceeding effluent limits for Fecal Coliform, Total Residual Chlorine, Copper, Oil and Grease, and Total Settleable Solids. The applicable RWQCB Settlement
JUNE 20, 2022
2 administrative penalty is $48,000. All of the violations were self-reported as required by law.
ITEM ANALYSIS
RWQCB staff have determined that the City is eligible for a compliance project in lieu of fines. The City has proposed a project that will cost an estimated $67,000 and will address the cause of the violations. The compliance project consists of the following:
1. Phase 1: replace outdated, manual computer system with modern System Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) computers and software. SCADA systems are used to control, monitor and analyze industrial wastewater treatment. Many of the effluent limitation violations were the result of power outages, which caused the chemical dosing pumps to shutdown and await a manual restart. Even with a backup generator, the brief interruption in electricity disrupts the treatment process. Through SCADA, the chemical treatment system will be automated and such circumstantial effluent limitation violations will be reduced.
2. Phase 2: replace the outdated reagent-based chlorine analyzers with modern amperometric monitoring devices. The current devices require daily, manual maintenance. Many of the effluent limit exceedances were the result of power outages that interrupt the chemical dosing pumps and chlorine monitoring devices.
The new chorine analyzers will require minimal maintenance no reagents and be less susceptible to failure following a power outage.
Since 2019, Operations Management, Inc. (“Jacobs”) has operated the plant under a contract with the City. Jacobs will be sharing the cost of the compliance project with the City. If the City fails to implement the compliance project, then the City will be liable for the full $48,000 administrative penalty. Upon approval of the City, the settlement agreement will be presented to the RWQCB for final approval.
Note: Some of the completion dates in the agreement are quickly approaching, however, staff have already begun implementation of the projects and will be able to the meet those deadlines.
FISCAL ANALYSIS
The implementation of the compliance project will be at a total cost to the sewer fund of approximately $67,000. Phase 1 (replacement of WWTP SCADA Hardware) is estimated to cost approximately $36,000, will be completed by June 30, 2022, and was budgeted in FY2021/22. Phase 2 (upgrading of the chlorine analyzers) is estimated to cost $31,000 and is included in the proposed budget for FY22/23, presented in another item on tonight’s agenda.
Jacobs’ share of the cost of the required compliance project is estimated at $24,000 and will be reimbursed as a credit to the City.
RWQCB Settlement
JUNE 20, 2022
3 STRATEGIC PLAN ASSESSMENT
GOAL 1: Support quality services, community, safety, and health to enhance the quality of life and experience of our residents and visitors
D. Provide and maintain an efficient, adequate infrastructure to provide for both current and future community needs
ATTACHMENTS
• Resolution No. 2022-42
• Proposed Settlement Agreement and Stipulation for Entry of Administrative Civil Liability Order (Order R1-2022-0021)
CITY OF CRESCENT CITY RESOLUTION NO. 2022-42 Page 1
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-42
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CRESCENT CITY
APPROVING A SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WITH THE REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD (ORDER R1-2022-0021)
WHEREAS, the City owns the Wastewater Treatment Plant located at 210 Battery Street, Crescent City and discharges treated wastewater to the Pacific Ocean pursuant to a permit issued by the North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB); and WHEREAS, the permit contains specific requirements that limit the pollutants in discharges and requires monitoring to ensure that the discharges meet those requirements; and WHEREAS, all exceedances of permit constituent limits are self-reported to the State; and WHEREAS, the State periodically reviews effluent limitation exceedances and assesses statutory penalties; and
WHEREAS, as a small community, the City qualifies for the option of implementing a compliance project in an amount equal to or greater than the potential fines that will directly address the limitation violations; and
WHEREAS, the Council has reviewed the proposed Order, which details the proposed compliance project, and agrees with the terms contained therein.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Crescent City that the Settlement Agreement and Stipulation for Entry of Administrative Civil Liability Order (Order R1- 2022-0021) signed June 2, 2022 by Claudia E. Villacorta, Assistant Executive Officer is hereby approved and Jon Olson, Director of Public Works is hereby authorized to sign the Order on behalf of the City of Crescent City.
PASSED AND ADOPTED and made effective the same day by the City Council of the City of Crescent City on this 20th day of June 2022, by the following polled vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Jason Greenough, Mayor
ATTEST:
__________________________
Robin Patch, City Clerk
CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD
NORTH COAST REGION
In the matter of:
City of Crescent City,
Wastewater Treatment Facility
Attn: Jonathan Olson
Director of Public Works
City of Crescent City
WDID No. 1A84006ODN
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Order R1-2022-0021
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND
STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF
ADMINISTRATIVE CIVIL LIABILITY
ORDER
Section I: Introduction
This Settlement Agreement and Stipulation for Entry of Administrative Civil Liability Order (Stipulated Order) is entered into by and between the Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region, Prosecution Team (Prosecution Team) and The City of Crescent City (Discharger) (collectively, “Parties”) and is presented to the Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region (Regional Water Board), or its delegate, for adoption as an Order by settlement pursuant to Government Code section 11415.60. This Stipulated Order resolves the violations reported by the Discharger, from September 22, 2015, through April 15, 2022, by the imposition of administrative civil liability against Discharger in the amount of $48,000.
Section II: Recitals
1. The Discharger owns and operates a Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF), a publicly owned treatment works (POTW), located at 210 Battery Street in Crescent City, California. From September 22, 2015, to the effective date of this Stipulated Order, the Discharger is or was subject to the following requirements issued by the Regional Water Board:
Regulatory Measure Order Number Effective Dates
NPDES Permit R1-2011-0019 06/30/2011 - 03/31/2017
NPDES Permit R1-2017-0002 04/01/2017 - Present
2. During the respective effective dates listed above, Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs) Order Nos. R1-2011-0019 and R1-2017-0002 (National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit No. CA0022756) established, among other things, final effluent limitations for the discharges from Discharger’s permitted discharge location, Discharge Point 001.
Order R1-2022-0021
Stipulated Administrative Civil Liability Order
Crescent City WWTF
3. On November 16, 2021, Regional Water Board staff invited Discharger to enter settlement negotiations prior to the Regional Water Board issuing an administrative civil liability complaint (ACLC). The Parties have agreed to resolve 20 violations for exceeding effluent limits for Fecal Coliform, Total Residual Chlorine, Copper, Oil and Grease, and Total Settleable Solids. These violations, which occurred between September 2015 and December 2021, are subject to MMPs pursuant to Water Code section 13385(h) and (i), as identified in Exhibit A to this Stipulated Order, for an administrative civil liability amount of $48,000.
4. Pursuant to Water Code section 13385(h), the Regional Water Board shall assess a $3,000 mandatory minimum penalty (MMP) for each serious violation. A “serious violation” means any waste discharge that violates the effluent limitations contained in the applicable WDRs for a Group II pollutant by 20 percent or more or for a Group I pollutant by 40 percent or more.
5. Pursuant to Water Code section 13385(i), the Regional Water Board shall assess a $3,000 MMP for each violation whenever a discharger does any of the following four or more times in period of six consecutive months, except that the requirement to assess the MMP shall not be applicable to the first three violations:
a. Violates a WDRs effluent limitation.
b. Fails to file a report pursuant to Water Code section 13260. c. Files an incomplete report pursuant to Water Code section 13260. d. Violates a toxicity effluent limitation contained in the applicable WDRs where the WDRs do not contain pollutant-specific effluent limitations for toxic pollutants.
6. The Discharger’s self-monitoring reports, from September 22, 2015 to April 15, 2022, document 20 violations of effluent limitations set forth in WDRs Order Nos.
R1-2011-0019 and R1-2017-0002. Of the 20 effluent limitation violations, 4 violations were exempt based on the exceedance count during the initial 180-day period. 16 (sixteen) violations are subject to MMPs pursuant to Water Code section 13385(h) and (i), as identified in Exhibit A.
Order R1-2022-0021
Stipulated Administrative Civil Liability Order
Crescent City WWTF
7. This Stipulated Order resolves 20 effluent limitation violations subject to MMPs pursuant to Water Code section 13385(h) and (i), as identified in Exhibit A, incorporated herein by reference. The total proposed administrative civil liability amount is $48,000 (16 violations x $3,000 per violation).
8. Pursuant to Water Code section 13385(k)(1), in lieu of assessing all or a portion of MMPs, the Regional Water Board may require a POTW serving a small community to spend an equivalent amount towards completion of a compliance project proposed by the POTW if the Regional Water Board finds all of the following:
a. The compliance project is designed to correct the violations within five years; b. The compliance project is in accordance with the State Water Resource Control Board’s (State Water Board) 2017 Water Quality Enforcement Policy (Enforcement Policy); and
c. The POTW has prepared a financing plan to complete the compliance project.
9. For the reasons discussed in Exhibit B, Regional Water Board staff have determined that Discharger meets the requirements under Water Code section 13385(k), and the Enforcement Policy to be recognized as a POTW serving a small community with a financial hardship. This determination makes Discharger eligible for a compliance project (CP).
10. Pursuant to the Enforcement Policy, Discharger must spend an amount of money on an approved CP that is equal to, or more than the total administrative liability amount held in abeyance pending completion of the project. Discharger has proposed a CP with an estimated cost of $67,000. The balance in excess of the administrative civil liability amount ($48,000) will be paid for with Discharger’s reserve funds.
11. To resolve the alleged violations set forth in Exhibit A, by consent and without further administrative proceedings, the Parties have agreed to the imposition of an administrative civil liability amount of $48,000 against Discharger. Discharger may offset up to $48,000 of this penalty through costs incurred to implement the CP. Up to $48,000 shall be permanently suspended upon timely completion of the project required herein.
12. The Parties have agreed to settle the matter without administrative or civil litigation and to present this Stipulated Order to the Regional Water Board, or its delegate, for adoption as an Order by settlement pursuant to Government Code section 11415.60.
Order R1-2022-0021
Stipulated Administrative Civil Liability Order
Crescent City WWTF
13. The Prosecution Team has determined that resolution of the alleged violations is fair and reasonable and fulfills its enforcement objectives, that no further action is warranted concerning the alleged violations except as provided in this Stipulated Order, and that this Stipulated Order is in the public’s best interest.
Section III: Stipulations
The Parties incorporate the foregoing Recitals and stipulate to the following:
14. Administrative Civil Liability: Discharger hereby agrees to pay the administrative civil liability totaling $48,000 to resolve the alleged violations. The Parties agree that up to the full $48,000 of this administrative civil liability shall be permanently suspended pending completion of the compliance project described in Section III, paragraph 17. If the suspended liability amount becomes due and payable pursuant to Section III, paragraphs 23 and 24, the assessed amount shall be submitted by check made payable to the “State Water Pollution Cleanup and Abatement Account,” no later than 30 days following notification from the Executive Officer. The check shall reference the Order number on page one of the Stipulated Order, and mailed to:
State Water Resources Control Board Accounting Office
Attn: ACL Payment
P.O. Box 1888
Sacramento, CA 95812-1888
Discharger shall provide a copy of the check via e-mail to the Regional Water Board ([email protected]).
15. Compliance Project Description: Discharger has proposed a two-part project with the objective of updating Crescent City WWTP’s computer system and monitoring devices in order to correct the alleged violations and return to compliance.
The first phase of the project will replace the outdated computer system with modern System Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) computers, as well as replacing the outdated hardware/software. SCADA computers are used to control, monitor, and analyze industrial wastewater treatment. Many of Discharger’s effluent limitation violations were the result of the facility’s outdated, manual computer system. The facility experiences frequent power outages, causing the chemical dosing pumps to shut down and require a manual restart. While the facility has a backup generator, even a brief interruption in electricity disrupts the treatment process. Through the installation of new hardware and software, Crescent City will be able to automate the chemical treatment system and reduce circumstantial effluent limitation violations.
Order R1-2022-0021
Stipulated Administrative Civil Liability Order
Crescent City WWTF
The second phase of the project aims to replace the Facility's outdated reagentbased chlorine analyzers with modern amperometric monitoring devices. Similar to the current computer system at Crescent City WWTP, the facility’s current monitoring devices require daily, manual maintenance. Many of the effluent limit violations that Crescent City WWTP has experienced during the violation review period are the result of power outages that interrupt the chemical dosing pumps and chlorine monitoring devices. The new chlorine analyzers will require minimal maintenance, no reagents, and be less susceptible to failure proceeding a power outage. Crescent City plans to buy three new chlorine analyzers (one for chlorine dose, one for chlorine residual, and one spare in case either of the other two needs replacement).
This Compliance Project will allow Crescent City WWTP to automate their wastewater treatment process, resulting in a reduction of effluent limit violations and a return to compliance.
16. CP Milestone Requirements: Discharger agrees that this Stipulated Order includes the Milestone Requirements set forth below. The Discharger acknowledges that credit for completing any Milestone Requirement is dependent on the Regional Water Board’s adoption of this Stipulated Order. The implementation schedule for completion of the CP, and current completion status for milestones, is set forth below:
Task Description Proposed
Completion Date Status
1 SCADA computers, software,
and licensing Purchase and
Install
June 30, 2022 Incomplete
2 SCADA computer programing
and startup at Crescent City
WWTF
July 31, 2022 Incomplete
3 Purchase new Chlorine
Analyzers July 31, 2022 Incomplete
4 First Quarterly Progress
Report
September 30,
2022 Incomplete
5 Complete Installation, testing,
commissioning of new chlorine
analyzers with new SCADA
System
December 31,
2022 Incomplete
Order R1-2022-0021
Stipulated Administrative Civil Liability Order
Crescent City WWTF
Task Description Proposed
Completion Date Status
6 Second Quarterly Progress
Report
December 31,
2022 Incomplete
7 Running new analyzers side
by side with existing system to
verify correct operation and
get Regional Water Board
approval to remove old system
December 31,
2022 – May 31,
2023
Incomplete
8 Third Quarterly Progress
Report March 31, 2023 Incomplete
9 Fourth Quarterly Progress
Report June 30, 2023 Incomplete
10 Submit Final Report/
Certification of CP completion
within 30 days of CP
completion
June 30, 2023 Incomplete
17. Representations and Agreements Regarding the Compliance Project:
a. As a material condition for the Regional Water Board’s acceptance of this Settlement Agreement, Discharger represents that it will use the suspended liability amount of $48,000 to implement the CP. The Discharger understands that its promise to implement the CP, in its entirety and in accordance with the schedule for implementation, is a material condition of this Settlement Agreement of between the Parties.
b. Discharger agrees to: (1) spend the total administrative liability amount as described herein, (2) provide certified, written reports on CP implementation to the Regional Water Board consistent with the terms of this agreement, and (3) within 30 days of the CP Completion Date, provide a certification by a responsible official, signed under penalty of perjury, that Discharger followed all applicable environmental laws and regulations in implementing the CP, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act, and the federal Clean Water Act. Discharger further agrees that the Regional Water Board has the right to require a third-party audit of the funds expended to implement the CP at Discharger’s cost, and that Discharger bears ultimate responsibility for meeting all deadlines specified in this Stipulated Order.
Order R1-2022-0021
Stipulated Administrative Civil Liability Order
Crescent City WWTF
18. Publicity Associated with the Compliance Project: Whenever Discharger or its agents or subcontractors publicize one or more elements of the CP, they shall state in a prominent manner that the project is undertaken as part of a settlement to a Regional Water Board enforcement action against Discharger.
19. Progress Reports: Because the CP is expected to be completed within approximately one year, this Order requires submission of quarterly progress reports while the project is underway. The Final Report is due by June 30, 2023, and shall include a description of work completed, authenticated photographs of the project and documentation of monies expended.
20. Certification of Compliance Project Completion: No later than June 30, 2023, after the CP Completion Date, a responsible official of Discharger shall submit a final progress report and certified statement, signed under penalty of perjury, which documents Discharger’s expenditures during the CP completion period and documents that Discharger completed the CP in accordance with the terms of this Stipulated Order. The expenditures may include external payments to outside vendors, but may not include the normal, routine work undertaken by Discharger staff. In making such certification, the signatories may rely upon normal organizational project tracking systems that capture employee time expenditures and external payments to outside vendors, such as environmental and information technology contractors or consultants. Documentation of CP completion may include photographs, invoices, receipts, certifications, and other materials reasonably necessary for the Regional Water Board to evaluate CP completion and the costs incurred. Discharger shall provide Regional Water Board staff with any additional information reasonably necessary to verify Discharger’s CP expenditures and completion.
21. Time Extension for CP: The Executive Officer of the Regional Water Board may extend the deadlines contained in this Stipulated Order if Discharger demonstrates delays from unforeseeable contingencies, provided that Discharger continues to undertake all appropriate measures to meet its deadlines. Discharger shall make any deadline extension request in writing at least 30 days prior to the applicable deadline if practicable.
Under no circumstances may the completion of the CP extend past five (5) years from the effective date of this Stipulated Order. Any approval of extension by the Executive Officer must be in writing.
22. Regional Water Board Acceptance of Completed CP: Upon Discharger’s satisfaction of its obligations under this Stipulated Order, completion of the CP, and any audits, the Executive Officer will issue a “Satisfaction of Order.” The Satisfaction of Order shall terminate any further obligations of Discharger under this Stipulated Order and permanently suspend the remaining penalty amount.
Order R1-2022-0021
Stipulated Administrative Civil Liability Order
Crescent City WWTF
23. Failure to Expend All Suspended Funds on the Approved CP: If Discharger is not able to demonstrate to the reasonable satisfaction of the Executive Officer that the entire civil administrative liability amount was spent on the completed CP, Discharger shall pay the difference between the civil administrative liability amount and the amount Discharger can demonstrate was actually spent on the CP (the Difference). If the Parties do not agree on the amount of suspended liability owed it shall be determined via a Motion for Payment of Suspended Liability before the Regional Water Board or its delegate. Unless the Regional Water Board or its delegate determines otherwise, Discharger shall not be entitled to any credit, offset, or reimbursement from the Regional Water Board for expenditures made on the CP prior to the Notice of Violation’s issuance date. If there is a material failure to satisfy a project milestone, the Executive Officer shall issue a “Notice of Violation” that will inform Discharger to pay the Difference (supra) to the State Water Pollution Cleanup and Abatement Account. Within 30 days of the Regional Water Board’s or its delegate’s determination of the suspended liability amount assessed for Discharger to pay, Discharger shall submit payment consistent with the payment method described in Section III, paragraph 15. Discharger shall submit payment consistent with the payment method described in Section III, paragraph 15. Timely payment of the Difference shall satisfy Discharger’s obligations to implement the CP.
24. Regional Water Board is not Liable: Neither the Regional Water Board members nor the Regional Water Board staff, attorneys, or representatives shall be liable for any injury or damage to persons or property resulting from negligent or intentional acts or omissions by Discharger, its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives or contractors in carrying out activities pursuant to this Stipulated Order, nor shall the Regional Water Board, its members or staff be held as parties to or guarantors of any contract entered into by Discharger, its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives or contractors in carrying out activities pursuant to this Stipulated Order.
25. Party Contacts for Communications related to Stipulation/Order:
For the Regional Water Board: For the Discharger:
Zane Stromberg
Environmental Scientist
North Coast Regional Water Quality
Control Board
5550 Skylane Boulevard, Suite A
Santa Rosa, CA 95403
[email protected]
(707) 576-2674
Jonathan Olson
Director of Public Works
City of Crescent City,
Wastewater Treatment Facility
377 J Street
Crescent City, CA 95531
[email protected]
(707) 951-3275
Order R1-2022-0021
Stipulated Administrative Civil Liability Order
Crescent City WWTF
26. Compliance with Applicable Laws: Discharger understands that payment of administrative civil liability in accordance with the terms of this Stipulated Order or compliance with the terms of this Stipulated Order is not a substitute for compliance with applicable laws, and that continuing violations of the type alleged herein may subject it to further enforcement, including additional administrative civil liability.
27. Matters Addressed by Stipulation: This Stipulated Order represents a final and binding resolution and settlement of the alleged violations as of the effective date of this Stipulated Order. The provisions of this paragraph are expressly conditioned on the completion of the Compliance Project as specified herein.
28. No Waiver of Right to Enforce: The failure of the Prosecution Team or Regional Water Board to enforce any provision of this Stipulated Order shall in no way be deemed a waiver of such provision, or in any way affect the validity of this Stipulated Order.
The failure of the Prosecution Team or Regional Water Board to enforce any such provision shall not preclude it from later enforcing the same or any other provision of this Stipulated Order. No oral advice, guidance, suggestions or comments by employees or officials of any Party regarding matters covered under this Stipulated Order shall be construed to relieve any Party regarding matters covered in this Stipulated Order. The Regional Water Board reserves all rights to take additional enforcement actions, including without limitation the issuance of administrative civil liability complaints or orders for violations other than those addressed by this Stipulated Order.
29. Attorney’s Fees and Costs: Except as otherwise provided herein, each Party shall bear all attorneys’ fees and costs arising from the Party’s own counsel in connection with the matters set forth herein.
30. Public Notice: The Discharger understands that this Stipulated Order must be noticed for a 30-day public review and comment period prior to consideration by the Regional Water Board or its delegate. If significant new information is received that reasonably affects the propriety of presenting this Stipulated Order to the Regional Water Board, or its delegate, for adoption, the Prosecution Team may unilaterally declare this Stipulated Order void and decide not to present it to the Regional Water Board or its delegate. Discharger agrees that it may not rescind or otherwise withdraw its approval of this Stipulated Order.
31. Addressing Objections Raised During Public Comment Period: The Parties agree that the procedure contemplated for the Regional Water Board’s or its delegate’s adoption of the Order, and public review of this Stipulated Order is Order R1-2022-0021
Stipulated Administrative Civil Liability Order
Crescent City WWTF
lawful and adequate. The Parties understand that the Regional Water Board, or its delegate, have the authority to require a public hearing on this Stipulated Order. In the event procedural objections are raised or the Regional Water Board requires a public hearing prior to the Order becoming effective, the Parties agree to meet and confer concerning any such objections and may agree to revise or adjust the procedure and/or this Stipulated Order as necessary or advisable under the circumstances.
32. Interpretation: This Stipulated Order shall be construed as if the Parties prepared it jointly. Any uncertainty or ambiguity shall not be interpreted against any one Party. The Parties are represented by counsel in this matter.
33. If Order Does Not Take Effect: In the event that the Order does not take effect because the Regional Water Board or its delegate does not approve it, or the State Water Board or a court vacates it in whole or in part, the Parties acknowledge that they expect to proceed to a contested evidentiary hearing before the Regional Water Board to determine whether to assess administrative civil liabilities for the underlying alleged violation(s), unless the Parties agree otherwise. The Parties agree that all oral and written statements and agreements made settlement discussions will not be admissible as evidence in the hearing. The Parties agree to waive any and all objections based on settlement communications in this matter, including, but not limited to the following:
a. Objections related to prejudice or bias of any of the Regional Water Board members or their advisors and any other objections that are premised in whole or in part on the fact that the Regional Water Board members or their advisors were exposed to some of the material facts and the Parties’ settlement positions as a consequence of reviewing the Stipulated Order, and therefore may have formed impressions or conclusions prior to any contested evidentiary hearing on the violations alleged in this matter; or b. Laches or delay or other equitable defenses based on the time period for administrative or judicial review to the extent this period has been extended by these settlement proceedings.
34. Waiver of Hearing: Discharger has been informed of the rights Water Code section 13323(b) provides, and hereby waives its right to a hearing before the Regional Water Board prior to the Order’s adoption.
35. Waiver of Right to Petition or Appeal: Discharger hereby waives its right to petition the Regional Water Board’s adoption of the Order for review by the State Water Board, and further waives its rights, if any, to appeal the same to a California Superior Court and/or any California appellate level court. This explicit waiver of rights includes potential future decisions by the Regional Water Board, or its delegate directly related to this Stipulated Order, including, but not limited to Order R1-2022-0021
Stipulated Administrative Civil Liability Order
Crescent City WWTF
time extensions, Compliance Project completion, and other terms contained in this Stipulated Order.
36. Covenant Not to Sue: Discharger covenants not to sue or pursue any administrative or civil claim(s) against any state agency or the State of California, their officers, Board Members, employees, representatives, agents, or attorneys arising out of or relating to any matter expressly addressed by the Complaint, this Stipulated Order or the Compliance Project.
37. Necessity for Written Modifications and Approvals: All modifications to this Stipulated Order and approvals and decisions of the Regional Water Board under the terms of this Stipulated Order shall be communicated to the Discharger in writing.
No oral advice, guidance, suggestions, or comments from Regional Water Board employees or officials regarding submissions or notices shall be construed to relieve the Discharger of its obligation to obtain any final written approval this Stipulated Order requires.
38. Authority to Bind: Each person executing this Stipulated Order in a representative capacity represents and warrants that he or she is authorized to execute this Stipulated Order on behalf of and to bind the entity on whose behalf he or she executes the Stipulated Order.
39. Severability: This Stipulated Order is severable; should any provision be found invalid; the remainder shall remain in full force and effect.
40. Counterpart Signatures; Facsimile and Electronic Signature: This Stipulated Order may be executed and delivered in any number of counterparts, each of which, when executed and delivered, shall be deemed to be an original, but such counterparts shall together constitute one document. Further, this Stipulated Order may be executed by facsimile or electronic signature, and any such facsimile or electronic signature by any Party hereto shall be deemed to be an original signature and shall be binding on such Party to the same extent as if such facsimile or electronic signature were an original signature.
41. Effective Date: This Stipulated Order shall be effective and binding on the Parties upon the date the Regional Water Board, or its delegate, enters the Order incorporating the terms of this Stipulated Order.
(Continued on next page)
Order R1-2022-0021
Stipulated Administrative Civil Liability Order
Crescent City WWTF
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
California Regional Water Quality Control Board,
North Coast Region Prosecution Team
Date: By:
Claudia Villacorta, P.E.
Assistant Executive Officer
Order R1-2022-0021
Stipulated Administrative Civil Liability Order
Crescent City WWTF
City of Crescent City,
Date: By:
Jonathan Olson, Director of Public Works
Order R1-2022-0021
Stipulated Administrative Civil Liability Order
Crescent City WWTF
ORDER OF THE REGIONAL WATER BOARD
42. This Order incorporates the foregoing Sections I through III by this reference as if set forth fully herein.
43. Issuance of this Order is being taken for the protection of the environment and to enforce the laws and regulations administered by the Regional Water Board and is exempt from provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code §21000 et seq.) in accordance with California Code of Regulations, title 14, section 15321(a)(2). This Order includes a Compliance Project in the North Coast Region. This Order generally accepts the plans proposed for the compliance project prior to implementation. Mere submittal of plans is exempt from CEQA as submittal will not cause a direct or indirect physical change in the environment.
44. The Executive Officer is authorized to refer this matter directly to the Attorney General for enforcement if Discharger fails to perform any of its obligations under the Order.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED pursuant to Water Code section 13323 and Government Code section 11415.60, on behalf of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region.
Date: By:
Matthias St. John
Executive Officer
Exhibits:
A. Effluent Limitation Violations Requiring Mandatory Minimum Penalties B. Determination of Financial Hardship Memo
C. Compliance Project Proposal
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
TO: MAYOR GREENOUGH AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ERIC WIER CITY MANAGER
BY: JON OLSON, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
ORRIN PLOCHER, FRESHWATER ENVIRONMENTAL
DATE: JUNE 20, 2022
SUBJECT: REPORT ON ANNUAL WATER SUPPLY AND DEMAND ASSESSMENT
AND RECENT EMERGENCY REGULATION TO REDUCE WATER
DEMAND AND IMPROVE WATER CONSERVATION
RECOMMENDATION
• Council direction to staff as necessary and appropriate
REPORT ON ANNUAL WATER SUPPLY AND DEMAND ASSESSMENT
According to the California Water Code 10632.1, “[a]n urban water supplier shall conduct an annual water supply and demand assessment pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 10632 and, on or before July 1 of each year, submit an annual water shortage assessment report to the department with information for anticipated shortage, triggered shortage response actions, compliance and enforcement actions, and communication actions consistent with the supplier’s water shortage contingency plan.” The City Water Shortage Contingency Plan (WSCP) includes the method and annual schedule for completing the Annual Water Supply Demand Assessment (AWSDA). The WSCP indicates that:
• The results of the Annual Assessment will be communicated to the Public Works Director and the City Manager, and
• The City Manager will report the findings of the Annual Assessment to the City Council before the end of June. The City Manager may recommend a water shortage emergency resolution to the city council if warranted.
The AWSDA (attached) concluded that based on the analysis of local precipitation trends, Smith River discharge trends, groundwater elevation trends, observations from the City’s
ANNUAL WATER SUPPLY AND DEMAND ASSESSMENT
June 20, 2022
2 Ranney Collector Well, and documented sustainability of the Smith River Groundwater Basin, the water supply will likely meet the projected demand over the next 12-months.
REPORT ON EMERGENCY REGULATION TO REDUCE WATER DEMAND AND
IMPROVE WATER CONSERVATION
State Water Resources Control Board Resolution No. 2022-0018 contains the following requirements that affect Crescent City:
• Each urban water supplier shall submit to the Department of Water Resources a preliminary annual water supply and demand assessment consistent with section 6 10632.1 of the Water Code no later than June 1, 2022. √ completed
• Each urban water supplier that has submitted a water shortage contingency plan to the Department of Water Resources shall implement by June 10, 2022, at a minimum, [implement] all demand reduction actions identified in the supplier’s water shortage contingency plan adopted under Water Code 10632 for a shortage level of ten (10) to twenty (20) percent (Level 2). √ completed
• To prevent the unreasonable use of water and to promote water conservation, the use of potable water is prohibited for the irrigation of nonfunctional turf at commercial, industrial, and institutional sites. • The use of water is not prohibited by this section to the extent necessary to ensure the health of trees and other perennial non-turf plantings or to the extent necessary to address an immediate health and safety need.
State Water Resources Control Board Resolution No. 2022-0018 additionally contains:
• Public information and awareness are critical to achieving conservation goals, and the Save Our Water campaign (SaveOurWater.com), run jointly by the Department of Water Resources (DWR) and the Association of California Water Agencies, is an excellent resource for conservation information and messaging that is integral to effective drought response.
Crescent City’s responsibilities include:
• Although the City is currently not experiencing or anticipating a water shortage per the above State requirements the City needs to implement all demand reduction actions identified in the City’s WSCP adopted under Water Code 10632 for a shortage level of ten (10) to twenty (20) percent.
In the City’s case, this is Level 1 demand reduction measures.
During a Stage I water shortage, voluntary water conservation is requested of all customers including the specific voluntary measures below:
ANNUAL WATER SUPPLY AND DEMAND ASSESSMENT
June 20, 2022
3 • Use water efficient indoor devices,
• Use of hose-end shutoff nozzles on all garden and utility hoses. • Refrain from washing cars, boats, trailers, or other vehicles except by hose with shutoff nozzle and bucket.
• Installation of low-flow shower heads, low-flush toilets, and faucet aerators. • Promptly repair all leaks in plumbing fixtures, water lines, and sprinkler systems.
The City will include the voluntary water conservation measures indicated above on the City Webpage and the City will also include a link to SaveOurWater.com on the City webpage.
FISCAL IMPACT
The total fiscal impact is limited.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Annual Water Supply and Demand Assessment (2022)
2. State Water Resources Control Board Resolution No. 2022-0018 “Emergency Regulation to Reduce Water Demand and Improve Water Conservation” 2022 ANNUAL WATER SUPPLY AND DEMAND ASSESSMENT
FOR
CRESCENT CITY, CALIFORNIA
Prepared for:
The City of Crescent City
Crescent City, California 95531
June 2022
Prepared by:
Orrin Plocher
78 Sunny Brae Center
Arcata, California 95521
Phone (707) 839-0091
Freshwater Environmental Services
2022 Annual Water Supply and Demand Assessment i June 2022 The City of Crescent City, Crescent City California Freshwater Environmental Services
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF APPENDICES ........................................................................................ ii
1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................1
1.1 Decision Making Process ............................................................................1
1.2 Data and Methodologies .............................................................................2
2.0 PRECIPITATION ............................................................................................3
3.0 SMITH RIVER DISCHARGE...........................................................................4
3.1 Time Period From 2002 through 2003.........................................................4
3.2 Time Period From 2012 through 2014.........................................................6
3.3 Time Period From 2020 through 2022.........................................................8
3.4 Smith River – Median Discharge Pattern ....................................................9
3.5 Historical Low Smith River Discharges......................................................10
4.0 GROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS...........................................................12
5.0 SMITH RIVER GROUNDWATER BASIN ....................................................14
6.0 CITY RANNEY COLLECTOR WELL OBSERVATIONS ..............................16
7.0 INFRASTRUCTURE CAPABILITIES AND PLAUSIBLE CONSTRAINTS.....17
8.0 PROJECTED WATER DEMAND AND SUPPLY ..........................................18
9.0 CONCLUSIONS............................................................................................19 2022 Annual Water Supply and Demand Assessment ii June 2022 The City of Crescent City, Crescent City California Freshwater Environmental Services
LIST OF APPENDICES
APPENDIX A Annual Water Supply and Demand Assessment Reporting Tables 2022 Annual Water Supply and Demand Assessment 1 June 2022 Crescent City, California Freshwater Environmental Services
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The City of Crescent City’s (City's) Annual Water Supply and Demand Assessment is intended to meet the requirements established in Water Code Section 10632(a)(2) which includes the following minimum procedures:
• The written decision-making process that an urban water supplier will use each year to determine its water supply reliability. • The key data inputs and assessment methodology used to evaluate the urban water supplier’s water supply reliability for the current year and one dry year, including all of the following:
o (i) Current year unconstrained demand, considering weather, growth, and other influencing factors, such as policies to manage current supplies to meet demand objectives in future years, as applicable.
o (ii) Current year available supply, considering hydrological and regulatory conditions in the current year and one dry year.
The annual supply and demand assessment may consider
more than one dry year solely at the discretion of the urban water supplier.
o (iii) Existing infrastructure capabilities and plausible constraints.
o (iv) A defined set of locally applicable evaluation criteria that are consistently relied upon for each annual water supply and demand assessment.
o (v) A description and quantification of each source of water supply. Water Code Section 10632.1
1.1 Decision Making Process
The City's Annual Water Supply and Demand Assessment will follow the approximate schedule listed below:
• Second week of May – Data collection, precipitation data, Smith River discharge data, groundwater elevation data from CASGEM well(s), and water elevation data from the City’s Ranney collector well. • Third week of May – Data evaluation. Determine current year unconstrained demand, current year available supply, identify existing infrastructure capabilities and plausible constraints, and generate the DraftAnnual Water Supply and Demand Assessment. • Fourth week of May – Annual Water Supply and Demand Assessment reviewed by Public Works Director and City Manager and finalized. 2022 Annual Water Supply and Demand Assessment 2 June 2022 Crescent City, California Freshwater Environmental Services • First week in June – Notice of public meeting.
• Third week in June – Report presented to City Council. • July 1 - Annual Water Supply and Demand Assessment provided to the Department of Water Resources.
1.2 Data and Methodologies
Crescent City has prepared Annual Water Supply and Demand Assessments utilizing the following data:
• Precipitation data from the Gasquet Ranger Station (GAS). https://cdec.water.ca.gov/dynamicapp/staMeta?station_id=GAS • Discharge data from the Smith River (USGS gauging station 11532500). https://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis/uv?11532500
• Groundwater elevation data from CASGEM wells within the Smith River Plain Groundwater Basin
https://www.casgem.water.ca.gov/OSS/(S(z5rtdpg2arwitxj1fodm0s5m))/D efault.aspx?ReturnUrl=%2fOSS%2f
• Projected current year unconstrained demand, and
• Projected current year available supply.
The above data was evaluated with similar methodologies and added to the analysis of water supply reliability contained in the Crescent City Water Shortage Contingency Plan (June 2021). A finer time increment of analysis was employed in the methodologies.
2022 Annual Water Supply and Demand Assessment 3 June 2022 Crescent City, California Freshwater Environmental Services
2.0 PRECIPITATION
Precipitation data was retrieved from the Gasquet Ranger Station (GAS). The Gasquet Ranger Station was selected due to its near proximity to the City Ranney collector well and range of continuous precipitation data (1940 through present).
Monthly precipitation data was used to determine precipitation totals for rolling 6- month periods representing wet and dry seasons (April-October, dry) and (October-April, wet) as shown below.
Driest two 6-month periods (2002 and 2003)
Single driest calendar year (2013)
Recent measurements (2020-present)
The three time periods shown above are historical examples of extreme dry conditions and were used for detailed comparison to Smith River discharge, CASGEM groundwater well elevations, and recent conditions at the City Ranney collector well.
2022 Annual Water Supply and Demand Assessment 4 June 2022 Crescent City, California Freshwater Environmental Services
3.0 SMITH RIVER DISCHARGE
Previous investigations have found that the Smith River discharge and corresponding gauge height elevation is correlated to the water levels observed in the City Ranney collector well under static (non-pumping) conditions. This is due to proximity of the well to the river. Examination of Smith River discharge trends during the three identified extreme dry periods is used as a proxy for conditions in the Ranney Collector well since data collection of water levels from the Ranney Collector well only began recently.
3.1 Time Period From 2002 through 2003
The period between 2002 and 2003 included 2 of the 3 recorded lowest 6-month precipitation totals including, May-October 2002 (2.12 inches), and May-October 2003 (4.04 inches). Smith River discharge (cfs) from 2002-2003 and monthly total precipitation are shown in the plots below:
Monthly Precipitation
(inches)
Discharge (cfs) Discharge (cfs)
2022 Annual Water Supply and Demand Assessment 5 June 2022 Crescent City, California Freshwater Environmental Services Below is a plot of the monthly precipitation compared to corresponding Smith River minimum monthly discharge (cfs) during the period of 2002 through 2004.
In the period of 2002 thru 2003, as precipitation totals approach zero inches per month, the influence of the surrounding groundwater basin feeding the Smith River is apparent, resulting in a “resistance”, keeping the discharge from falling below approximately 188 cfs.
Monthly Precipitation (inches)
Minimum Monthly Discharge (cfs)
2022 Annual Water Supply and Demand Assessment 6 June 2022 Crescent City, California Freshwater Environmental Services
3.2 Time Period From 2012 through 2014
The period between 2012 and 2014 includes the driest calendar year 2013. Smith River discharge (cfs) from 2012-2014 and monthly total precipitation are shown in the plots below:
From 2012 through 2014 the lowest discharge for the Smith River was 223 cfs.
Monthly Precipitation
(inches) Discharge (cfs) Discharge (cfs)
2022 Annual Water Supply and Demand Assessment 7 June 2022 Crescent City, California Freshwater Environmental Services Below is a plot of the monthly precipitation compared to corresponding Smith River minimum monthly discharge (cfs) during the period of 2012 through 2014.
In the period of 2012 thru 2014, as precipitation totals approach zero inches per month, the influence of the surrounding groundwater basin feeding the Smith River is apparent, resulting in a “resistance”, keeping the discharge from falling below approximately 223 cfs.
Monthly Precipitation (inches)
Minimum Monthly Discharge (cfs)
2022 Annual Water Supply and Demand Assessment 8 June 2022 Crescent City, California Freshwater Environmental Services
3.3 Time Period From 2020 through 2022
The period between 2020 and 2022 includes lowest historical Smith River discharge.
Smith River discharge (cfs) from 2020-2022 and monthly total precipitation are shown in the plots below:
From 2020 through 2022 the historical lowest discharge for the Smith River was 157 cfs in September 2021.
Monthly Precipitation
(inches) Discharge (cfs) Discharge (cfs)
2022 Annual Water Supply and Demand Assessment 9 June 2022 Crescent City, California Freshwater Environmental Services Below is a plot of the monthly precipitation compared to corresponding Smith River minimum monthly discharge (cfs) during the period of 2020 through 2022.
In the period of 2020 thru 2022, as precipitation totals approach zero inches per month, the influence of the surrounding groundwater basin feeding the Smith River is apparent, resulting in a “resistance”, keeping the discharge from falling below approximately 157 cfs.
3.4 Smith River – Median Discharge Pattern
The USGS has calculated a median discharge of the period of their recording Smith River discharge. The plots below show actual Smith River discharge (cfs) and median discharge for the three extreme dry time periods used in this assessment. The median discharge pattern can be compared to the actual discharge for specific years to get a sense of whether discharge in a specific year is generally above average, generally below average, average, or chaotic and irregular. Monthly Precipitation (inches) Minimum Monthly Discharge (cfs)
2022 Annual Water Supply and Demand Assessment 10 June 2022 Crescent City, California Freshwater Environmental Services Below normal winter discharge patterns are shown for 2020, 2021 and 2022. A chaotic and irregular pattern is shown for 2020 and 2022 which reduces the ability to forecast future conditions based on historical trends.
3.5 Historical Low Smith River Discharges
Since 1988 the Smith River discharge has been below 200 cfs ten times for various numbers of days as listed below:
2022 Annual Water Supply and Demand Assessment 11 June 2022 Crescent City, California Freshwater Environmental Services Start Date End Date Days <200 cfs Min cfs
10/19/1991 10/21/1991 2 199
9/14/1992 10/28/1992 44 180
9/21/1994 10/12/1994 21 189
10/20/1995 11/8/1995 19 184
9/8/2001 10/2/2001 24 166
9/26/2002 11/6/2002 41 188
9/25/2008 10/2/2008 7 188
9/21/2018 10/27/2018 36 185
9/8/2020 9/23/2020 15 194
8/12/2021 10/17/2021 66 157
The lowest recorded discharge occurred in September 2021 during a period of 66 days with discharge generally below 200 cfs.
2022 Annual Water Supply and Demand Assessment 12 June 2022 Crescent City, California Freshwater Environmental Services
4.0 GROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS
Groundwater elevations data were accumulated and analyzed from a CASGEM monitored groundwater well (ID 17N01W02P001H) located in the Smith River groundwater plain further downstream from the City’s Ranney well collector, but with a similar proximity to the Smith River.
Below is a plot of groundwater elevations in feet msl (shown in red) for 1990-2022 and 6- month precipitation totals prior to groundwater measurements in inches (shown in blue) and measured groundwater elevations
A focused look at the precipitation lows is provided below to better view the impact on the water table elevation.
During periods of extremely low precipitation, groundwater elevations have not fallen below 10 feet msl.
2022 Annual Water Supply and Demand Assessment 13 June 2022 Crescent City, California Freshwater Environmental Services Groundwater elevation is plotted against the past 6-month precipitation totals below:
As seen in the Smith River, as precipitation totals approach zero inches per month, the influence of the surrounding groundwater basin is apparent, resulting in a “resistance”, generally keeping the groundwater elevation from falling below 10 feet msl. 6-Month Precipitation (inches)
Groundwater Elevation (feet msl)
2022 Annual Water Supply and Demand Assessment 14 June 2022 Crescent City, California Freshwater Environmental Services
5.0 SMITH RIVER GROUNDWATER BASIN
The Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) requires the Department of Water Resources to prioritize each of California’s 515 groundwater basins and subbasins basin based on eight components. Basin prioritization is a technical process that utilizes the best available data and information to classify groundwater basins into one of four categories high-, medium-, low-, or very low-priority. The technical process is based on eight components that are identified in the California Water Code Section 10933(b). (1) The population overlying the basin or subbasin.
(2) The rate of current and projected growth of the population overlying the basin or subbasin.
(3) The number of public supply wells that draw from the basin or subbasin. (4) The total number of wells that draw from the basin or subbasin. (5) The irrigated acreage overlying the basin or subbasin. (6) The degree to which persons overlying the basin or subbasin rely on groundwater as their primary source of water.
(7) Any documented impacts on the groundwater within the basin or subbasin, including overdraft, subsidence, saline intrusion, and other water quality degradation.
(8) Any other information determined to be relevant by the department, including adverse impacts on local habitat and local streamflows.
Selected data from the prioritization of the Smith Groundwater Basin are included below:
Basin ID 1-001
Basin Name Smith River Plain
Subbasin Name
Basin Area (Acre) 40434.48606
Basin Area (Sq. Mile) 63.17888447
Hydrologic Region North Coast
Basin Status Final
Active Groundwater Level Monitoring
0 = No 1 = Yes 1
Critical Overdraft (B118-16)
0=No 1=Yes 0
Final Priority Points 0
Final Basin Priority Very Low
Public Supply Wells 19
Production Wells 1309
Production Well /Sq. mile 20.71
Irrigated 5457
Irrigated Acreage /Sq. Mile 86.37
2022 Annual Water Supply and Demand Assessment 15 June 2022 Crescent City, California Freshwater Environmental Services Decline Comment(s)/Source(s) No documented Groundwater Level Declines Subsidence Comment(s)/Source(s) No documented groundwater extraction induced inelastic Subsidence
Component 7.c
Salt Intrusion Points 0
Saline Intrusion Comment(s)/Source(s) No documented Saline Intrusion SGMA 2019 Basin Prioritization
Basin Priority Very Low
The analysis indicated that the Smith River Groundwater Basin was classified as very low priority. As a result of the documented sustainability of the Smith River Groundwater Basin it did not warrant additional assessment and management planning. 2022 Annual Water Supply and Demand Assessment 16 June 2022 Crescent City, California Freshwater Environmental Services
6.0 CITY RANNEY COLLECTOR WELL OBSERVATIONS
Water levels have been collected from the City Ranney collector well through a SCADA system since September 2019. Water thickness measurements were converted to elevation (feet msl) by adding the elevation of the bottom of the well 7.13 feet to the water thicknesses. Monthly maximum drawdown and static water level elevation (feet msl) are plotted below with monthly precipitation totals and minimum monthly Smith River discharge (cfs).
During the lowest historical Smith River discharge (157 cfs) the maximum drawdown elevation was 20.9 feet msl. Since the effective pump intake elevation is 12.13 feet msl during the lowest historical Smith River discharge there was 8.77 feet of water above the pump intake elevation.
Elevation (feet msl) Discharge (cfs) Precipitation
(inches)
2022 Annual Water Supply and Demand Assessment 17 June 2022 Crescent City, California Freshwater Environmental Services
7.0 INFRASTRUCTURE CAPABILITIES AND PLAUSIBLE CONSTRAINTS The City relies on a single Ranney Collector Well located adjacent to the Smith River.
Historic low river conditions (September 2021) resulted in a drawdown that left over 8 feet of water remaining above the pump intake. Historical patterns of precipitation and Smith River discharge have become less regular and unpredictable making forecasting based on historical performance less certain.
One plausible constraint is that the water level within the Ranney Collector Well could fall below the vertical position of the pump intake. The pump intake elevation is 12.13 feet msl. The elevation of the laterals entering the Ranney Collector well range from 11.63 to
9.13 feet msl and the elevation of the top of the plug at the bottom of the well is 7.13 feet msl.
2022 Annual Water Supply and Demand Assessment 18 June 2022 Crescent City, California Freshwater Environmental Services
8.0 PROJECTED WATER DEMAND AND SUPPLY
Projected water demand for the next 12 months is based on the demand in the last 12 months. Population is not projected to increase, and demand is anticipated to remain steady reflecting the seasonal trends as shown below:
Based on historical conditions and our understanding of the Smith River Groundwater Basin, supply is anticipated to equal demand over the next 12 months. 50 55
60 65
70 75
80 Monthly Demand (Million Gallons)
2022 Annual Water Supply and Demand Assessment 19 June 2022 Crescent City, California Freshwater Environmental Services
9.0 CONCLUSIONS
This Section describes the conclusion of the 2022 Annual Water Demand and Supply Analysis.
Based on the analysis of local precipitation trends, Smith River discharge trends, groundwater elevation trends, observations from the City’s Ranney Collector Well, and documented sustainability of the Smith River Groundwater Basin, the water supply will likely meet the projected demand over the next 12-months.
APPENDIX A
ANNUAL WATER SUPPLY AND DEMAND ASSESSMENT REPORTING
TABLES
Table 1. Annual Assessment Information
Annual Assessment Information (Required)
Year Covered By This Shortage Report
Start: July 1, 2022
End: June 30, 2023
Volume Unit for Reported Supply and Demand (Must
use the same unit throughout) MG
Water Supplier's Contact Information
Agency Name: City of Crescent City
Contact Name: Jon Olson
Contact Title: Director of Public Works
Street Address: 377 J Street
ZIP Code: 95531
Phone Number: (707) 464-7483 ext. 234
Email Address: [email protected]
Report Preparer's Contact Information
(if different from above)
Preparer's Organization Name: Freshwater Environmental Services Preparer's Contact Name: Orrin Plocher
Phone Number: 707-498-9071
Email Address: [email protected] Supplier's Water Shortage Contingency Plan
WSCP Title Crescent City Water Shortage Contingency Plan WSCP Adoption Date 6/21/2021
Other Annual Assessment Related Activities (Optional)
Activity Timeline/ Outcomes / Links / Notes
Annual Assessment/ Shortage Report Title: Optional
Annual Assessment / Shortage Report Approval Date: Optional Other Annual Assessment Related Activities: Optional
Other Annual Assessment Related Activities: Optional
Other Annual Assessment Related Activities: Optional
= From prior tables
= Auto calculated
Use Type Start Year: 2022 Volumetric Unit Used: MG
Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun3
Total by Water
Demand Type
Landscape 0
Single Family 24 25 25 20.23 18 18 19 18 16 16 20 24.221 243.9212666 Commercial 30 30 32 29.14 27 25 27 26 25 25 28 29.689 332.9994496 Industrial 0 0 0 0.033 0.1 0.4 0 0 0 0 0 0.0284 0.81641208 Losses 24 21 16 13.95 15 19 18 14 21 23 26 17.591 227.4928717 0 0
0 0
Other Potable 0
77 77 72 63.35 60 63 63 58 62 64 74 71.53 805.23
Transfers to other agencies
Primary 0
Industrial Secondary 0
Groundwater recharge Tertiary 0
Wetlands or wildlife habitat Secondary 0
Other Nonpotable Advanced 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Total
84 80 75 74 64 63 64 61 66 63 67 71 833
0 0
0 Table 2: Water Demands1
Projected Water Demands - Volume2
Total by Month (Non-Potable)
1 Projections are based on best available data at time of submitting the report and actual demand volumes could be different due to many factors. 2 Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent. 3When optional monthly volumes aren't provided, please enter yearly volumes in the June column (Jun3 ).
Notes: Demand is projected to be consistent with 2021 consumption data Total by Month (Potable)
Additional
Description (as
needed)
Level of
Treatment
for NonPotable
Supplies
Drop down
list
Drop down list
May select each use multiple times
These are the only Use Types that will
be recognized by the WUEdata online
submittal tool
(Add additional rows as needed)
Demands Served by Potable Supplies
Demands Served by Non-Potable Supplies
Three years ago total demand
Four years ago total demand
Optional (for comparison purposes)
Last year's total demand
Two years ago total demand
= From prior tables
= Auto calculated
Water Supply Start Year: 2022 Volumetric Unit Used: MG
Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun3
Total by
Water Supply
Type
Groundwater (not desal.) 77 77 72.19 63 60 63 63 58 62 64 74 71.53 805.23 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 77 77 72.19 63 60 63 63 58 62 64 74 71.53 805.23 0
Recycled Water 0 Primary
Groundwater (not desal.) 0 Secondary
Stormwater Use 0 Tertiary
Source 4 0 Advanced
Source 5 4 4
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0
Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Total
0 Table 3: Water Supplies1
Projected Water Supplies - Volume2
Water
Quality
Drop
Down List
Total Right
or Safe
Yield*
(optional)
Additional
Detail on
Water Supply
Drop Down List
May use each category multiple
times.These are the only water
supply categories that will be
recognized by the WUEdata online
submittal tool
(Add additional rows as needed)
Potable Supplies
Non-Potable Supplies
eAR Reported Total Water Supplies
Optional (for comparison purposes)
1 Projections are based on best available data at time of submitting the report and actual supply volumes could be different due to many factors. 2 Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent. 3When optional monthly volumes aren't provided, please enter yearly volumes in the June column (Jun3 ).
Notes: List hydrological and regulatory conditions, infrastructure capabilities, and plausible constraints which may impact the water supplies Total by Month (Potable)
Total by Month (Non-Potable)
= Auto calculated
= For manual input
Table 4(P): Potable Water Shortage Assessment1
Start Year: 2022 Volumetric Unit Used2
: MG
Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun3Total
Anticipated Unconstrained Demand 77.21 76.53 72.19 63.35 60.23 62.89 63.33 57.55 62.27 64.35 73.80 71.53 805.23 Anticipated Total Water Supply 77.21 76.53 72.19 63.35 60.23 62.89 63.33 57.55 62.27 64.35 73.8 71.53 805.23 Surplus/Shortage w/o WSCP Action 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 % Surplus/Shortage w/o WSCP Action 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% State Standard Shortage Level 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 Benefit from WSCP: Supply Augmentation 0.0
Benefit from WSCP: Demand Reduction 0.0
Revised Surplus/Shortage with WSCP 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 % Revised Surplus/Shortage with WSCP 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% = Auto calculated
= For manual input
Table 4(NP): Non-Potable Water Shortage Assessment1
Start Year: Volumetric Unit Used2
:
Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun3Total
Anticipated Unconstrained Demand: Non-Potable 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 Anticipated Total Water Supply: Non-Potable 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Surplus/Shortage w/o WSCP Action: Non-Potable 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 % Surplus/Shortage w/o WSCP Action: Non-Potable #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! Benefit from WSCP: Supply Augmentation 0.0
Benefit from WSCP: Demand Reduction 0.0
Revised Surplus/Shortage with WSCP 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 % Revised Surplus/Shortage with WSCP #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! Annual Water Supply and Demand Assessment for §10632.1
= From prior tables
Planned WSCP Actions
1 Assessments are based on best available data at time of submitting the report and actual volumes could be different due to many factors. 2 Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent. 3When optional monthly volumes aren't provided, please enter yearly volumes in the June column (Jun3 ). If a shortage is projected, the supplier is highly recommended to perform a monthly analysis to more accurately identify the time of shortage.
Annual Water Supply and Demand Assessment for §10632.1
= From prior tables
Planned WSCP Actions
1 Assessments are based on best available data at time of submitting the report and actual volumes could be different due to many factors. 2 Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent. 3When optional monthly volumes aren't provided, please enter yearly volumes in the June column (Jun3 ). If a shortage is projected, the supplier is highly recommended to perform a monthly analysis to more accurately identify the time of shortage.
July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2023
Enter Amount
(Drop Down
List)
Select % or
Volume Unit
Start Month End Month
1 Expand Public Information Campaign Yes NA MG July June Table 5: Planned Water Shortage Response Actions
NOTES: Crescent City is always in Stage 1 which is a voluntery stage. No shortage gap is anticipated based on historic and current conditions.
Add additional rows as needed
How much is action going to
reduce the shortage gap?
When is shortage response
action anticipated to be
implemented? Is Action
Already Being
Implemented?
(Y/N)
ACTIONS: Demand Reduction, Supply
Augmentation, and Other Actions.
(Drop Down List)
These are the only categories that will be
accepted by the WUEdata online submittal
tool. Select those that apply.
Anticipated
Shortage
Level
(Drop Down List of
State Standard
Levels 1 - 6)
STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-0018
TO ADOPT AN EMERGENCY REGULATION
TO REDUCE WATER DEMAND AND IMPROVE WATER CONSERVATION
WHEREAS:
1. On April 21, May 10, July 8, and October 19, 2021, Governor Newsom issued proclamations that a state of emergency exists statewide due to severe drought conditions and directed state agencies to take immediate action to preserve critical water supplies and mitigate the effects of drought and ensure the protection of health, safety, and the environment.
2. These proclamations urge Californians to reduce their water use.
3. On March 28, 2022, Governor Newsom signed an Executive Order directing the State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board or Board) to consider adopting emergency regulations to increase water conservation. The Executive Order includes a request that the Board require urban water suppliers to implement Level 2 of their water shortage contingency plans, establish water shortage response actions for urban water suppliers that have not submitted water shortage contingency plans, taking into consideration model actions that the Department of Water Resources, and establish a ban on the irrigation of nonfunctional turf by entities in the commercial, industrial, and institutional sectors.
4. Many Californians and urban water suppliers have taken bold steps over the years to reduce water use; nevertheless, the severity of the current drought requires additional conservation actions from urban water suppliers, residents, and the commercial, industrial, and institutional sectors.
5. Water conservation is the easiest, most efficient, and most cost-effective way to quickly reduce water demand and extend limited water supplies through this summer and into the next year, providing flexibility for all California communities.
Water saved is water available next year, giving water suppliers added flexibility to manage their systems effectively over time. The more water that is conserved now, the less likely it is that a community will experience dire shortages that may require water rationing or other emergency actions.
6. Most Californians use more water outdoors than indoors. In many areas, 50 percent or more of daily water use is for irrigation of lawns and outdoor landscaping irrigation. Outdoor water use is generally discretionary, and many irrigated landscapes would not suffer greatly from receiving a decreased amount of water.
2 7. The use of potable water to irrigate turf on commercial, industrial, or institutional properties that is not regularly used for human recreational purposes or for civic or community events can be reduced in commercial, industrial, and institutional areas to protect local water resources and enhance water resiliency.
8. Public information and awareness are critical to achieving conservation goals, and the Save Our Water campaign (SaveOurWater.com), run jointly by the Department of Water Resources (DWR) and the Association of California Water Agencies, is an excellent resource for conservation information and messaging that is integral to effective drought response.
9. SaveWater.CA.Gov is an online tool designed to help save water in communities.
This website lets anyone easily report water waste from their phone, tablet, or computer by simply selecting the type of water waste they see, typing in the address where the waste is occurring, and clicking send. These reports are filed directly with the State Water Board and relevant local water supplier.
10.Enforcement against water waste is a key tool in conservation programs. When conservation becomes a social norm in a community, the need for enforcement is reduced or eliminated.
11.On March 28, 2022, the Governor suspended the environmental review required by the California Environmental Quality Act to allow State Water Board-adopted drought conservation emergency regulations and other actions to take place quickly to respond to emergency conditions.
12.Water Code section 1058.5 grants the State Water Board the authority to adopt emergency regulations in certain drought years in order to: “prevent the waste, unreasonable use, unreasonable method of use, or unreasonable method of diversion, of water, to promote water recycling or water conservation, to require curtailment of diversions when water is not available under the diverter’s priority of right, or in furtherance of any of the foregoing, to require reporting of diversion or use or the preparation of monitoring reports.”
13.On May 13, 2022, the State Water Board issued public notice that it will consider the adoption of the regulation at the Board’s regularly scheduled May 24, 2022 public meeting, in accordance with applicable State laws and regulations. The State Water Board also distributed for public review and comment a Finding of Emergency that complies with State laws and regulations.
14.The emergency regulation exempts suppliers from enforcing connection moratoria, if their Level 2 demand management actions call for them, because new residential connections are critical to addressing the state’s housing supply shortage. However, the Board recognizes connections for other projects may not be appropriate given the shortage conditions and urges water suppliers to carefully evaluate new development projects for their water use impacts. 3 15.Disadvantaged communities may require assistance responding to Level 2 conservation requirements, including irrigation restrictions, temporary changes to rate structures, and prohibited water uses. State shortage contingency plans aimed at increasing water conservation, and state and local agencies should look for opportunities to provide assistance in promoting water conservation. This assistance should include but not be limited to translation of regulation text and dissemination of water conservation announcements into languages spoken by at least 10 percent of the people who reside in a water supplier’s service area, such as in newspaper advertisements, bill inserts, website homepage, social media, and notices in public libraries.
16.The Board directs staff to consider the following in pursuing any enforcement of section 996, subdivision (e): before imposing monetary penalties, staff shall provide one or more warnings; monetary penalties must be based on an ability to pay determination, consider allowing a payment plan of at least 12 months, and shall not result in a tax lien; and Board enforcement shall not result in shutoff.
17.The Board encourages entities other than Board staff that consider any enforcement of this regulation to apply these same factors identified in resolved paragraph 16. Nothing in the regulation or in the enforcement provisions of the regulation precludes a local agency from exercising its authority to adopt more stringent conservation measures. Moreover, the Water Code does not impose a mandatory penalty for violations of the regulation adopted by this resolution, and local agencies retain their enforcement discretion in enforcing the regulation, to the extent authorized, and may develop their own progressive enforcement practices to encourage conservation.
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT:
1. The State Water Board adopts California Code of Regulations, title 23, section 996, as appended to this resolution as an emergency regulation that applies to urban water suppliers, as defined by Water Code section 10617.
2. State Water Board staff shall submit the regulation to the Office of Administrative Law (OAL) for final approval.
3. If, during the approval process, State Water Board staff, the State Water Board, or OAL determines that minor corrections to the language of the regulation or supporting documentation are needed for clarity or consistency, the State Water Board Executive Director or designee may make such changes. 4 4. This regulation shall remain in effect for one year after filing with the Secretary of State unless the State Water Board determines that it is no longer necessary due to changed conditions or unless the State Water Board renews the regulation due to continued drought conditions, as described in Water Code section 1058.5.
5. The State Water Board directs State Water Board staff to work with the Department of Water Resources and the Save Our Water campaign to disseminate information regarding the emergency regulation.
6. The State Water Board directs staff to, by January 1, 2023, survey urban water suppliers on their experience protecting trees and tree cover during drought, with attention to disadvantaged communities. The survey shall inquire about challenges encountered, strategies used, costs, and successes in protecting trees.
7. Nothing in the regulation or in the enforcement provisions of the regulation precludes a local agency from exercising its authority to adopt more stringent conservation measures. Local agencies are encouraged to develop their own progressive enforcement practices to promote conservation.
CERTIFICATION
The undersigned Clerk to the Board does hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true, and correct copy of a resolution duly and regularly adopted at a meeting of the State Water Resources Control Board held on May 24, 2022.
AYE: Chair E. Joaquin Esquivel
Vice Chair Dorene D’Adamo
Board Member Sean Maguire
Board Member Laurel Firestone
NAY: None
ABSENT: Board Member Nichole Morgan
ABSTAIN: None
Jeanine Townsend
Clerk to the Board
5 ADOPTED EMERGENCY REGULATION TEXT
Version: May 24, 2022
Title 23. Waters
Division 3. State Water Resources Control Board and Regional Water Quality Control Boards
Chapter 3.5. Urban Water Use Efficiency and Conservation Article 2. Prevention of Drought Wasteful Water Uses
§ 996. Urban Drought Response Actions
(a) As used in this section:
(1) “Commercial, industrial and institutional” refers to commercial water users, industrial water users, and institutional water users as respectively defined in Water Code, section 10608.12, subdivisions (e), (i), and (j), and includes homeowners’ associations, common interest developments, community service organizations, and other similar entities but does not include the residences of these entities’ members or separate interests.
(2) “Common interest development” has the same meaning as in section 4100 of the Civil Code.
(3) “Community service organization or similar entity” has the same meaning as in section 4110 of the Civil Code.
(4) “Homeowners’ association” means an “association” as defined in section 4080 of the Civil Code.
(5) “Non-functional turf” means turf that is solely ornamental and not regularly used for human recreational purposes or for civic or community events. Nonfunctional turf does not include sports fields and turf that is regularly used for human recreational purposes or for civic or community events. (6) “Plant factor” has the same meaning as in section 491. (7) “Separate interest” has the same meaning as in section 4185 of the Civil Code.
(8) “Turf” has the same meaning as in section 491.
(9) “Urban water supplier” has the same meaning as Water Code section 10617. (10) “Water shortage contingency plan” means the plan required by Water Code section 10632.
(b) Each urban water supplier shall submit to the Department of Water Resources a preliminary annual water supply and demand assessment consistent with section 6 10632.1 of the Water Code no later than June 1, 2022, and submit a final annual water supply and demand assessment to the Department of Water Resources no later than the deadline set by section 10632.1 of the Water Code. (c) (1) Each urban water supplier that has submitted a water shortage contingency plan to the Department of Water Resources shall implement by June 10, 2022, at a minimum, all demand reduction actions identified in the supplier’s water shortage contingency plan adopted under Water Code 10632 for a shortage level of ten (10) to twenty (20) percent (Level 2).
(2) Notwithstanding subdivision (c)(1), urban water suppliers shall not be required to implement new residential connection moratoria pursuant to this section. (3) Notwithstanding subdivision (c)(1), an urban water supplier may implement the actions identified in subdivision (d) in lieu of implementing the demand reduction actions identified in the supplier’s water shortage contingency plan adopted under Water Code section 10632 for a shortage level of ten (10) to twenty (20) percent (Level 2), provided the supplier meets all of the following:
(i) The supplier’s annual water supply and demand assessment submitted to the Department of Water Resources demonstrates an ability to maintain reliable supply until September 30, 2023.
(ii) The supplier does not rely on, for any part of its supply, the Colorado River, State Water Project, or Central Valley Project, and no more than ten (10) percent of its supply comes from critically overdrafted groundwater basins as designated by the Department of Water Resources.
(iii) The supplier's average number of gallons of water used per person per day by residential customers for the year 2020 is below 55 gallons, as reported to the Board in the Electronic Annual Report.
(d) Each urban water supplier that has not submitted a water shortage contingency plan to the Department of Water Resources shall, by June 10, 2022, and continuing until the supplier has implemented all demand reduction actions identified in the supplier’s water shortage contingency plan adopted under Water Code 10632 for a shortage level of ten (10) to twenty (20) percent (Level 2), implement at a minimum the following actions:
(1) Initiate a public information and outreach campaign for water conservation and promptly and effectively reach the supplier’s customers, using efforts such as email, paper mail, bill inserts, customer app notifications, news articles, websites, community events, radio and television, billboards, and social media. (2) Implement and enforce a rule or ordinance limiting landscape irrigation with potable water to no more than two (2) days per week and prohibiting landscape irrigation with potable water between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. (3) Implement and enforce a rule or ordinance banning, at a minimum, the water uses prohibited by section 995. Adoption of a rule or ordinance is not required if the supplier has authority to enforce, as infractions, the prohibitions in section 995 and takes enforcement against violations.
7 (e) (1) To prevent the unreasonable use of water and to promote water conservation, the use of potable water is prohibited for the irrigation of non-functional turf at commercial, industrial, and institutional sites.
(2) Notwithstanding subdivision (e)(1), the use of water is not prohibited by this section to the extent necessary to ensure the health of trees and other perennial non-turf plantings or to the extent necessary to address an immediate health and safety need.
(3) Notwithstanding subdivision (e)(1), an urban water supplier may approve a request for continued irrigation of non-functional turf where the user certifies that the turf is a low water use plant with a plant factor of 0.3 or less, and demonstrates the actual use is less than 40% of reference evapotranspiration. (f) The taking of any action prohibited in subdivision (e) is an infraction punishable by a fine of up to five hundred dollars ($500) for each day in which the violation occurs. The fine for the infraction is in addition to, and does not supersede or limit, any other remedies, civil or criminal.
(g) A decision or order issued under this section by the Board, or an officer or employee of the Board, is subject to reconsideration under article 2 (commencing with section 1122) of chapter 4 of part 1 of division 2 of the Water Code.
Authority: Section 1058.5, Water Code.
References: Article X, Section 2, California Constitution; Sections 4080, 4100, 4110, and 4185, Civil Code; Section 8627.7, Government Code; Sections 102, 104, 105, 275, 350, 377, 491, 1122, 10608.12, 10617, 10632, and 10632.1, Water Code; Light v. State Water Resources Control Board (2014) 226 Cal.App.4th 1463; Stanford Vina Ranch Irrigation Co. v. State of California (2020) 50 Cal.App.5th 976.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
TO: MAYOR GREENOUGH AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ERIC WIER, CITY MANAGER
DATE: JUNE 20, 2022
SUBJECT: LETTER OF SUPPORT FOR SUTTER COAST HOSPITAL’S APPLICATION
FOR HOSPICE LICENSE
______________________________________________________________________
RECOMMENDATION
• Authorize the Mayor to sign letter of support for Sutter Coast Hospital’s application for Hospice license
BACKGROUND
Del Norte County has been without Hospice care for two decades and due to the need in our community for end-of-life care, Sutter Coast Hospital is applying for Hospice licensing. Presently, there is a moratorium in place for new hospice licensure due to larger metropolitan communities and the existence of excessive fraud (SB 664). The law does, however, allow for an exception to the moratorium for new license applications in areas that show a demonstrable need for hospice services. Del Norte County has not had hospice care for 20 years and the need is only increasing.
Sutter Coast Hospital is asking for an exception to the moratorium and that its application be considered due to the demonstrable need for hospice services in Del Norte County.
FISCAL ANALYSIS
Authorizing one or more letters of support as requested has no direct fiscal impact.
STRATEGIC PLAN ASSESSMENT
The Council’s consideration of this action is consistent with Strategic Plan Goal 1: Support Quality Services, Community Safety, and Health to Enhance the Quality of Life and Experience of Our Residents and Visitors.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Draft Letter of Support
June 16, 2022
California Department of Public Health
Licensing and Certification Program
Centralized Applications Branch
PO Box 997377, MS 3207
Sacramento, CA 95899-7377
Subject: Letter to support Sutter Coast Hospital’s application for Hospice Licensing To Whom it May Concern:
On behalf of the City Council of the City of Crescent City, I am writing this letter to support Sutter Coast Hospital’s request for exception to apply for a Hospice license in Del Norte County pursuant to SB 664. This important service in our community has ben absent for two decades and there is a growing need to provide end of life care within our rural community.
Sutter Coast Hospital operates the sole not-for-profit hospital and home health agency in Del Norte County servicing the county’s roughly 28,000 residents. We recognize that there is a moratorium in place for new hospice licensure; however, Del Norte County does not have a hospice program serving the community. The lack of a hospice service means that members of our community end up spending the last days of their lives either in a hospital when they would much prefer to be home surrounded by those who love them, or in their home without the muchneeded support services inclusive of pain management, medical, emotional, and spiritual support.
Del Norte County oftentimes is a casualty of larger metropolitan missteps, as it is in this case.
We understand the reasoning for the moratorium in larger communities where the fraud was excessive, but Del Norte County has not had a hospice program for nearly 20 years. This program would be run by Sutter Coast Hospital and regulated by their policy and procedures in addition to State requirements.
On behalf of our citizens, the City Council of the City of Crescent City strongly encourages you to consider Sutter Coast Hospital’s request for exemption in applying for a hospice license that will serve Del Norte County.
Sincerely,
Jason Greenough
Mayor
City of Crescent City
CC:
Office of Senator Mike McGuire
Office of Assemblyman Jim Wood
Mitch Hanna, CEO Del Norte Sutter Coast
Ellie Popadic, Director of Ambulatory Services, Strategy and Business Development
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
TO: MAYOR GREENOUGH AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ERIC WIER, CITY MANAGER
BY: ROBIN PATCH, CITY CLERK/ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST
DATE: JUNE 20, 2022
SUBJECT: AB 2237 – TRANSPORTATION PLANNING
______________________________________________________________________
RECOMMENDATION
• Direct staff to draft a letter in opposition to AB 2237 – Transportation planning:
regional transportation improvement plan: sustainable communities strategies:
climate goals
BACKGROUND
As stated in the action alert drafted by the League of California Cities, this bill would condition state and local transportation funding on a project’s consistency with applicable Sustainable Communities Strategy and the state’s climate goals. Further, it would institute a zero tolerance threshold for transportation projects that are thought to increase vehicle miles traveled, threatening many fix it first and safety projects. If this bill is passed, it would surpass local control and bind transportation and spending decision making by allowing the California Air Resources Board to use unclear benchmarks to reject critical transportation projects and reallocate those funds for active transportation projects regardless of the needs of the community.
FISCAL ANALYSIS
Writing a letter of support has no financial impact.
ATTACHMENTS
• AB 2237 – Action Alert
• Draft opposition letter
ACTION ALERT
AB 2237 (Friedman)
Transportation planning: regional transportation improvement plan:
sustainable communities strategies: climate goals.
Oppose
ACTION:
AB 2237 may be heard on the Assembly floor no later than May 27, 2022.
All Assembly Members need to hear from their cities. Voice your opposition to AB 2237 by calling your Assembly Member and submitting a letter TODAY. A sample letter is attached.
Background: Current law requires each Metropolitan Planning Organization to develop a sustainable communities strategy to achieve per-capital greenhouse gas reduction targets set by the California Air Resources Board.
What does AB 2237 specifically do?
• Would condition state and local transportation funding on a project’s consistency with the applicable Sustainable Communities Strategy and the state’s climate goals. • Would institute a zero-tolerance threshold for transportation projects that are thought to increase vehicle miles traveled, threatening many fix-it-first and safety projects.
• Would usurp local control and bind transportation and spending decision-making by allowing the California Air Resources Board to use unclear benchmarks to reject critical transportation projects and reallocate those funds for active transportation projects regardless of the needs of a community.
Talking Points:
• We ask you to oppose AB 2237.
• AB 2237 is based on incorrect conclusions from the California Transportation Assessment Report which excluded many local expenditures and local project-level data.
• AB 2237 would create a new ranking system for transportation projects and allow the California Air Resources Board to reallocate funding without taking into consideration local needs.
• A zero-tolerance policy for vehicle miles traveled or greenhouse gas emissions is an impractical and unworkable one-size-fits-all solution. Projects should be evaluated based on greenhouse gas reductions relative to existing infrastructure and safety needs.
• Local governments are already working collaboratively to develop sustainable community strategies to align regional transportation projects with the state’s climate goals.
ALL LETTERS MUST BE UPLOADED INTO THE ELECTRONIC PORTAL. The portal automatically sends letters to the author’s office and the committee(s) of jurisdiction. Please visit https://calegislation.lc.ca.gov/advocates/ to create an account and upload the letter.
If you are having difficulty accessing the portal, please contact Meg Desmond at [email protected].
In addition to submitting the letter through the portal, please send a physical copy to your Legislator(s)and email a copy to [email protected] as well as your Regional Public Affairs Manager.
***CITY LETTERHEAD***
DATE
The Honorable Laura Friedman
Member, California State Assembly
1021 O Street, Suite 8220
Sacramento, CA 95814
RE: AB 2237 (Friedman): Transportation planning: regional transportation improvement plan: sustainable communities strategies: climate goals.
Notice of OPPOSITION (As amended April 18, 2022)
Dear Assembly Member Friedman,
The City/Town of __________ must respectfully oppose your measure AB 2237, which takes an overly prescriptive approach that impacts regional and local flexibility to meet the greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction targets expected under SB 375 (Steinberg, 2008).
We are concerned that AB 2237 is based on the conclusions of the California Transportation Assessment Report (AB 285, 2019) which used limited data and excluded local project-level data provided pursuant to SB 1 (Beall, 2017). Also, the report relies heavily on Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP) data sets, which exclude many local complete streets and maintenance expenditures that are broadly consistent with state transportation climate goals, as well as significant transit funding.
As a result, the report incorrectly concludes that a disproportionate amount of transportation funds have been, and continue to be, spent on capacity-increasing highway and road projects. The report lacks important granular data such as transit operating and maintenance costs and local fix-it-first expenditures, which are not included in the FTIPs.
AB 2237 would also upend the existing framework for regional transportation planning in the state’s metropolitan areas in favor of a new ranking process, which would prohibit any project that increases vehicle miles traveled. Local governments are working collaboratively to develop sustainable community strategies (SCS) to align regional transportation projects with the state’s climate goals.
Our communities rely on a safe and strong transportation infrastructure network. AB 2237 would threaten many fix-it-first and safety enhancement projects that may reach the state’s climate goals, but don’t reduce vehicle miles traveled.
PLEASE CITE HOW YOUR CITY IS ALIGNING LOCAL TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS WITH GHG REDUCTIONS HERE.
For these reasons, the City/Town of _______ opposes AB 2237.
Sincerely,
NAME
TITLE
CITY/TOWN of ______________
cc: Your Assembly Member and Senator
Your Cal Cities Regional Public Affairs Manager (via email) League of California Cities (via email: [email protected])
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
TO: MAYOR GREENOUGH AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ERIC WIER, CITY MANAGER
BY: LINDA LEAVER, FINANCE DIRECTOR
DATE: JUNE 20, 2022
SUBJECT: FISCAL YEAR 2022-23 BUDGET, POSITION CONTROL,
APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT, AND GENERAL FUND RESERVE POLICY
______________________________________________________________________
RECOMMENDATION
• Open public hearing
o Receive staff report
o Technical questions from Council
o Receive public comment
• Close public hearing
• Further Council discussion
• Adopt Resolution No. 2022-44, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF CRESCENT CITY ADOPTING THE ANNUAL BUDGET OF
THE CITY OF CRESCENT CITY, INCLUDING ANY ATTACHMENTS
AND/OR APPENDICES, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-23
• Adopt Resolution No. 2022-45, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF CRESCENT CITY SELECTING THE ANNUAL ADJUSTMENT FACTORS FOR THE CALCULATION OF THE FISCAL YEAR 2022-23
APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR THE CITY OF CRESCENT CITY
• Adopt Resolution No. 2022-46, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF CRESCENT CITY REVISING THE SALARY SCHEDULE FOR
CERTAIN CONTRACT POSITIONS
• Adopt Resolution No. 2022-47, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF CRESCENT CITY APPROVING A GENERAL FUND
RESERVE POLICY
BACKGROUND
The process of creating the coming fiscal year’s budget typically begins as soon as the mid-year budget review for the current fiscal year is completed. The City Manager, Finance Director, Department Heads, and Managers review current trends and forecast the next year’s revenues and expenses in detail. Once the initial budget requests are FISCAL YEAR 2022-23 BUDGET ADOPTION
JUNE 20, 2022
2 received, the Finance Director compiles all of the data and presents an overview to the City Manager. Typically, the initial requests will exceed the forecasted revenues, and the Finance Director and City Manager meet with each department to make adjustments. The goal is to present a budget proposal that matches ongoing revenues to ongoing expenses, with strategic use of reserve funds for priority projects.
The Measure S Oversight Committee is also an important part of the budget process. The Committee is charged with reviewing and reporting on the revenues and expenses of Measure S funds, as well as providing recommendations to the City Council on future expenditures. The Committee met February 9, March 15, April 27, and May 11 to review the status of Measure S funds and develop a recommendation for FY 2022-23 expenditures. The final result of those meetings was the adoption of Resolution MS 2022- 02 recommending priorities to be funded with Measure S. Those recommendations were incorporated into the proposed budget discussed at the City Council’s budget workshop.
The City Council held a public workshop May 31 and June 2, 2022 to discuss the Fiscal Year 2022-23 budget. The City Manager and Finance Director presented the proposed budget and City staff were present to provide additional information on their respective departments. The Chair of the Measure S Oversight Committee also presented the Committee’s budget recommendations for Measure S funds.
The Council directed staff to bring back the FY 2022-23 budget for adoption, including all of the Measure S Oversight Committee’s recommendations, and to incorporate some additional priorities:
• Additional payment toward the unfunded pension liability ($70,000 allocated across multiple funds)
• Set aside for possible cash flow financing needs for large grant projects ($65,000 General Fund)
• Additional contribution as requested by the Crescent City/Del Norte Chamber of Commerce and Visitors Bureau ($30,000 General Fund)
• Marketing campaign ($24,000 General Fund and RV Park Fund) • New tables for the Cultural Center ($8,500 to be paid out of RMAP funds) • Asset management software implementation ($25,000 RV Park Fund) • Begin design for updated RV Park bathrooms ($10,000 RV Park Fund) • Plans and begin improvements for Corporation Yard ($50,000 Buildings Fund)
ITEM ANALYSIS
The budget presented here includes the direction received from the Council at the budget workshop.
Important trends impacting the budget include:
• Consumer Price Index (CPI) for March 2022 over March 2021 was 8.5% (based on CPI-U Los Angeles). This factor directly impacts wages, as all of the City’s employee bargaining units agreed (in the contracts approved last year) to a FISCAL YEAR 2022-23 BUDGET ADOPTION
JUNE 20, 2022
3 Cost-of-Living Adjustment (COLA) for FY 22-23 tied to this index. All four units agreed to a COLA based on this index but capped at 3.0%. Therefore, a 3% COLA is included in this budget. Inflation also impacts the City’s costs for utilities, supplies, etc. Staff has included some inflation assumptions into the proposed budget, although the current rate of inflation is concerning. The Finance Department provides monthly budget reports to the Council and will be monitoring the trends.
• Staff plans to pay the required unfunded pension liability payment to CalPERS as a lump sum (rather than spread out over monthly payments), which results in interest savings of approximately $32,000. That savings plus an additional $38,000 will be used to make an extra payment of $70,000 toward the unfunded liability.
• The City’s annual insurance premium, which includes workers compensation, general liability, property, auto, etc., has increased by 11.5% this year. These costs are allocated across all funds.
• Sales tax, Measure S, and Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) have increased.
Staff has included a somewhat conservative budget projection for these revenues, considering current inflation and gas prices. This will continue to be monitored and reported to Council.
• The City follows best practice in setting conservative budgets. Staff attempts to forecast revenues in a conservative but realistic manner, and all anticipated expenses and positions are included in the budget. Actual expenses typically come in lower than the approved budget, due to a variety of factors (unfilled staff positions, deferred projects, routine expenses coming in under budget, etc.). Budget-to-actual variances are reported to the Council monthly.
Projects that span multiple years are included in the budget resolution to be carried over automatically. The proposed budget includes the estimated amounts remaining in each of these projects. After the Fiscal Year 2021-22 books are closed and the actual amounts are finalized, the Fiscal Year 2022-23 budget will be updated to reflect the actual remaining amounts. This practice of carry-over budgeting will allow these projects to continue moving forward while staff works to close the books for this year.
Staffing
The staffing budget includes the addition of five positions in public safety (two in the Police Department and three in the Fire Department).
The long-term staffing plan for the police department included adding one officer in FY 21-22, one in FY 22-23, and one in FY 23-24 using Measure S funds. One position was approved in FY 21-22 but has not been able to be filled. The second position is approved in this budget, and both of these new positions are on track to be filled by recruits who will attend the Police Academy this year and become sworn officers in January. The third police officer added this year is funded through a DOJ tobacco grant and will be filled by an officer providing School Resource Officer and tobacco-related duties. That grant will FISCAL YEAR 2022-23 BUDGET ADOPTION
JUNE 20, 2022
4 fund the position for three years, after which the position will either be funded as the third Measure S position, or possibly funded by an agreement with the School District.
The three new positions in the Fire Department are full-time Fire Captains. These positions are an important part of the Fire Department Master Plan approved by the City Council and Fire District Board in 2019 to improve the long-term sustainability of the department. The City and Fire District jointly operate and fund Crescent City Fire and Rescue, which consisted of a Fire Chief, Administrative Assistant, and volunteer firefighters for many years. In order to meet the needs of the community, the Fire Chief was on call 24 hours a day, seven days a week, with support from volunteers. As calls for service have increased, this model is not sustainable. In order to guarantee response around-the-clock, the Master Plan calls for three full-time captains responding to calls with the help of volunteers. The Master Plan also creates a station staffing program providing stipends to volunteers who stay at the fire station for 12-hour shifts to respond to calls.
One other change in approved positions is in the Lab. The Lab operates seven days a week, providing sampling and testing for the City’s water and sewer systems as well as outside clients. The current position control authorizes a Lab Director and two Lab Technicians. One of the Lab Technician positions has been vacant for some time, and following discussions with the Lab Director and Public Works Director, staff recommends changing this vacancy to a part-time position.
The proposed budget includes a 3% Cost of Living Adjustment for all bargaining units and contract employees, as agreed in the Memorandums of Understanding that cover July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2023. The wages for positions covered by the four bargaining units will be updated automatically and attached to the MOUs. Contract employees are provided the same COLA as the Crescent City Management Employees Association per the standard contract terms. A resolution is attached to this staff report showing the new wages for those positions.
All four MOUs are expiring at the end of FY 22-23, and the City will be entering negotiations this year will all bargaining groups.
Major Funds
A brief summary of each of the City’s major funds is provided below. More detail is included in the attached budget document. The budget document includes every fund of the City, actual revenues and expenses for three prior fiscal years, budgeted revenues and expenses for the current fiscal year, estimated actual revenues and expenses for the current fiscal year, and the proposed budget for Fiscal Year 2022-23. Additional information in the budget document includes the City’s organizational chart, projected fund balances, authorized position control, and appropriations limit. A copy of Resolution MS 2022-02, the recommendations from the Measure S Oversight Committee, is also included.
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23 BUDGET ADOPTION
JUNE 20, 2022
5 General Fund
The General Fund contains all governmental services that are not accounted for in other funds. These services include public safety (police and fire), community development (code enforcement, building inspection, planning, and engineering), streets, economic development, recreation (swimming pool, parks, and Cultural Center), and administration.
These services are largely funded through tax revenues, although some are partially or fully funded through charges for service, cost recoveries, and grants.
The largest revenue sources in the General Fund are sales tax, Measure S, and Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT). In November 2020, the voters of Crescent City approved Measure S, a 1% local tax (technically a “transactions and use tax” but often referred to as an addon sales tax). Measure S began to be collected by retailers in April 2021. This revenue is intended to fund essential services in the General Fund, including police, fire, streets, and the swimming pool.
Other revenue sources in the General Fund include property taxes, charges for services, licenses and permits, grants, transfers, and other sources. Total General Fund revenues are projected to be slightly higher (3%) than estimated revenues this year. Staff tries to budget revenues with a reasonable but conservative approach and provide updates to Council throughout the year. Revenue projections include sales tax and Measure S budgeted the same as this year, TOT slightly decreased (in case the recent increase in gas prices results in less travel), and an increase in charges for service (largely related to increased costs in the Fire Department to implement the Master Plan, with a corresponding revenue from the Fire District for its share of those costs). -
200,000
400,000
600,000
800,000
1,000,000
1,200,000
1,400,000
1,600,000
1,800,000
2,000,000
FY 19-20 Actual FY 20-21 Actual FY 21-22 Budget FY 22-23 Proposed
Sales Tax Measure S TOT
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23 BUDGET ADOPTION
JUNE 20, 2022
6 FY 21-22
Budget
FY 21-22
Estimated
FY 22-23
Proposed
Sales tax 2,000,000 2,007,812 2,000,000
Measure S
2,000,000
2,050,236
2,000,000
TOT
1,840,000
1,842,910
1,580,000
Other taxes
814,700
796,544
834,200
Grants
606,083
390,107
576,358
Charges for service
762,792
678,099
967,495
Licenses and permits
345,800
318,256
325,300
Transfers in
350,144
309,172
355,580
ISF provided
225,066
217,164
235,587
Other
147,682
131,209
145,962
Total
9,092,267
8,741,509
9,020,482
Expenditures in the General Fund include staffing, materials, utilities, contract services, transfers, and other expenses in order to provide the services listed above. As a servicedriven organization, the largest share of expenditures in the General Fund is wages and benefits (approximately 51%) which is typical for a full-service City. The proposed budget includes both ongoing operational costs and one-time costs, which may be funded by grants, Measure S, or general City revenues. Significant one-time costs (not including those funded by Measure S, which is discussed separately) include:
Front Street (G Street to I Street) – General Fund
transfer, in addition to Measure S, ARPA, and LTCO 767,534 Cultural diversity project (grant) 30,000
Economic resiliency project (grant) 60,000
SB2 planning project (grant) 143,000
LEAP project (grant) 55,000
Second K9 – in addition to Measure S 12,000
Safety improvements (sidewalk repair, removal of
dangerous trees) – funded with RMAP 30,000
Replace damaged light poles on Hwy 101 25,000
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23 BUDGET ADOPTION
JUNE 20, 2022
7 Repair light pole foundations in K Street parking lot 15,000 Marketing campaign (General Fund portion) 12,240
Set-aside for possible cash flow financing needs for
large grant projects 65,000
Additional Chamber of Commerce / Visitors Bureau
request 30,000
Additional PERS unfunded liability payment (General
Fund portion) 35,000
The budget includes all of the items that were recommended by the Measure S Oversight Committee.
• Fire Department ($362,450 net)
o Create 3 full-time Fire Captain positions
o Continue stipend updates
o Overnight volunteer staffing at fire station
o Increased training
o Small equipment replacement
o Computers for emergency response vehicles
o Firefighter escape bags
o SCBA compressor for City fire station
o SCBA packs and bottles
o Facility improvements to City fire station (drainage) o Deposit into vehicle/apparatus replacement fund
o Note the Fire Department costs are shared with the Fire District. Due to the cost allocation, the net City cost is slightly less than the total expenditure recommended by the Committee, but all recommended items are included in the budget.
• Police Department ($510,739)
o Two additional officers (to begin as recruits)
o Assign one officer to Detective duty
o Promote one Sergeant to Lieutenant
o Second K9
o Tasers, body cams, dash cams
o Firearms and PPE
o Replace 10 radios
o New lockers for officers
o Design for facility improvements
o Two vehicle replacements
• Streets ($605,000*)
o Additional street light repairs
o Additional sidewalk repairs
o Additional striping
o Minor repairs of potholes, crack sealing
o Contribution toward purchase of mini excavator
o Deposit to Capital Improvement Fund for second half of large maintenance project
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23 BUDGET ADOPTION
JUNE 20, 2022
8 o * The Committee recommended (and this budget includes) $550,000 in new spending for FY 22-23. The proposed budget total is $605,000 due to rolling over unspent design funds from the current fiscal year, also recommended by the Committee.
• Swimming pool ($511,701)
o Parts and equipment replacements and spares, including primary chlorine storage tank, chemical day tanks, chemical control sensor replacement, ADA door sensor replacement, online reservation system, and slide repair
o Support operations including staffing and utilities
o Transfer to Capital Improvement Fund for locker room flooring project Measure S funds are tracked, and if any Measure S revenues are not spent, the balance is carried forward to be used on future Measure S projects and activities. Staff estimates the current year projection plus the proposed budget will result in a Measure S balance of approximately $200,000 at the end of FY 22-23.
Total General Fund expenditures are proposed to increase approximately 8% over the current budget.
FY 21-22
Budget
FY 21-22
Estimated
FY 22-23
Proposed
Wages and benefits
4,296,414
4,014,237
5,290,776
Utilities
343,010
287,663
335,959
Materials and supplies
700,151
477,722
867,984
Contract services
1,534,824
1,154,702
1,419,141
Employee support, training
184,493
101,602
210,644
Contributions
140,000
139,853
163,000
Interest
-
-
65,000
Transfers out
1,931,530
1,931,483
1,416,134
ISF charges
393,200
376,044
428,500
Other
208,181
162,896
196,242
Total
9,731,803
8,646,202
10,393,380
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23 BUDGET ADOPTION
JUNE 20, 2022
9 The City has a policy of maintaining a General Fund balance of at least 25% of total expenditures. The current policy, adopted in 2013, does not clearly define the purpose of the reserve or what counts as an expenditure. The Council discussed the reserve policy at the budget workshop and directed staff to update the policy to clarify:
• The purpose of the reserve is to maintain operations for at least 90 days in an emergency.
• The reserve should be calculated as 25% of operational expenditures, not including one-time projects that are reimbursed by grants, capital purchases, or transfers to the capital improvement fund.
• When estimating the future balance in the reserve, it is reasonable to assume that 5% of the operating budget will not be spent, as historical data shows we have come in an average of 10% under budget.
An updated policy with these clarifications is attached to this staff report for Council approval.
The fund balance was $3,497,523 at the last audit (June 30, 2021). The estimated fund balance for June 30, 2022 is $3,592,828. It is important to note this estimate is based on year-to-date results through April plus estimates for the remainder of the year. Actual results will not be known until the fiscal year is closed, and results will vary from this estimate.
The proposed budget, if all revenues come in exactly as budgeted and all expenses are fully spent, would reduce the estimated fund balance by $1,372,898 leaving a fund balance of $2,219,930. Assuming that 5% of the operating budget (not including capital expenses or one-time projects funded by grants) is not spent, the ending fund balance would be estimated at $2,555,899.
Fund balance at 6/30/21
3,497,523
Estimated fund balance at 6/30/22
3,592,828
FY 22-23 budgeted revenues
9,020,482
FY 22-23 budgeted expenditures
(10,393,380)
Fund balance at 6/30/23 if budget fully spent
2,219,930
Fund balance at 6/30/23 with 5% operational budget savings
2,555,899
Of the budgeted expenditures for FY 22-23, one-time projects funded by grants total $323,074 and capital purchases / transfers to capital improvement funds total $1,481,134.
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23 BUDGET ADOPTION
JUNE 20, 2022
10 Therefore, of the $10,393,380 total budget, $1,804,208 should be removed from the calculation of the required reserve.
Total budgeted expenditures
10,393,380
One-time projects reimbursed by grants
(323,074)
Capital expenses / transfers to capital improvement funds
(1,481,134)
Operational expenses
8,589,172
Reserve 25% of operational expenses
2,147,293
The estimated ending fund balance at 6/30/23, using the projection for the current year, and assuming 5% budget-to-actual savings in operating expenses, is $2,555,899. Of that amount, approximately $200,000 is estimated to be Measure S. Calculating the reserve, this leaves slightly over $200,000 in unallocated fund balance remaining. This amount can be left in reserve for additional security against inflation or emergency or allocated to a priority project by the Council.
Fund balance at 6/30/21
3,497,523
Estimated fund balance at 6/30/22
3,592,828
Fund balance at 6/30/23 with 5% operational budget savings
2,555,899
Estimated Measure S balance
200,000
Reserve 25% operating expenses
2,147,293
Fund balance remaining unallocated
208,606
Housing Authority
The Housing Authority is federally funded through the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and assists low-income individuals and families throughout Del Norte County with housing vouchers. We are currently providing assistance to 558 families per month.
Revenues for the Housing Authority are determined on a calendar year basis by Congress. The proposed budget for FY 2022-23 revenues and expenses is increased compared to the current year. This is due partly to the expansion of programs (Emergency FISCAL YEAR 2022-23 BUDGET ADOPTION
JUNE 20, 2022
11 Housing Vouchers, VASH, Mainstream Vouchers, and project-based vouchers) and partly to efforts to increase utilization rates, which have suffered during COVID. The current year is budgeted to close with a fund balance of $417,308. The proposed budget for FY 2022-23 would close with a fund balance of $434,687.
FY 2021-22
Budget
FY 2022-23
Proposed
Revenues
4,068,629
4,374,671
Expenditures
4,091,169
4,357,292
Net
(22,540)
17,379
Ending Fund Balance
417,308
434,687
RV Park Fund
The City owns and operates Lighthouse Cove RV Park, which is a 94-space RV park just across Elk Creek from Beachfront Park. This is an enterprise fund, which means revenues from the users of this service are intended to cover the fund’s expenses.
Revenues in this fund remain difficult to predict. In the last two years, we have implemented a new fee structure, dealt with COVID impacts, and are now projecting the impacts of high inflation and gas prices. Staff has proposed a conservative revenue projection and will provide updates to the Council in its monthly budget-to-actual reports.
Expenses include the new staffing structure that was recently implemented, marketing, selection and implementation of an asset management program, and design for updated bathrooms.
FY 2021-22
Budget
FY 2021-22
Estimated
FY 2022-23
Proposed
Revenues
419,800
522,510
519,500
Expenses
526,860
475,109
583,004
Net
(107,060)
47,401
(63,504)
Ending Working Capital
262,104
416,565
353,061
Sewer Fund
The Sewer Fund is an enterprise fund, and users are charged for the services provided.
User fees and other revenues are intended to cover the ongoing costs of providing the FISCAL YEAR 2022-23 BUDGET ADOPTION
JUNE 20, 2022
12 services and are set through a rate study and Prop 218 process. The last rate study was completed in 2015 and recommended a rate increase. Although the Prop 218 process to increase rates was successful, the rates were stopped by referendum on the 2016 ballot.
The City has not increased sewer rates since 2014. Staff has worked to stabilize this fund on multiple fronts, including restructuring the loan, contracting operations to Jacobs Engineering, and revising and deferring capital improvements and major maintenance.
The state recently allocated funding to the City to complete a new rate study. As there are currently no rate increases proposed, revenue projections for FY 22-23 are largely stable, with some fluctuation in grant revenues due to projects being carried over for completion.
Expenses in the proposed budget include large investments in needed major maintenance and capital costs. The most significant major maintenance items are a project to camera and assess half of the City’s sewer lines and manholes for $175,000 (the other half to be budgeted next year), and maintenance of the belt press at the WWTP for $70,000. CIP that is budgeted in the current year but not complete will be automatically carried over until finished. The proposed budget includes an estimate of these carry-over amounts, which will be updated when exact expenses from this year are finalized.
Membrane replacement / mem pulse
560,000
RBC gear box and bearing rehab
120,000
RBC valve
90,000
Boiler
300,000
Influent gate
184,000
Secondary clarifiers - valves and meters
80,000
C water meter
12,000
Primary effluent flow
120,000
MBR lighting and outlets
28,000
Chemical room lighting
50,000
Chlorine analyzers
31,000
Digester valves
80,000
Laser alignment tool
18,000
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23 BUDGET ADOPTION
JUNE 20, 2022
13 West hypo storage tank
140,000
CIP budget
1,813,000
The budget also includes the annual loan payment of $1,697,663 which will continue until the loan is paid off in 2041.
FY 2021-22
Budget
FY 2021-22
Estimated
FY 2022-23
Proposed
Revenues (net of CIP transfers)
5,364,049
5,281,483
5,312,491
Operating expenses (net of CIP transfers)
4,417,760
3,764,327
4,624,359
CIP
1,161,204
-
1,813,000
Debt service
1,697,663
1,697,663
1,697,663
Net
(1,912,578)
(180,507)
(2,822,531)
Ending working capital
3,775,317
5,507,388
2,684,857
Water Fund
The Water Fund is an enterprise fund, and users are charged for the services provided.
User fees and other revenues are intended to cover the ongoing costs of providing the services and are set through a rate study and Prop 218 process. The City has not increased water rates since 2017.
Expenses in the proposed budget include significant investment in important capital improvements. CIP that is budgeted in the current year but not complete will be automatically carried over until finished. The proposed budget includes an estimate of these carry-over amounts, which will be updated when exact expenses from this year are finalized.
Elevated tank
98,139
Amador tank rehabilitation
748,417
Washington tank rehabilitation (design)
75,000
PRV generator
60,000
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23 BUDGET ADOPTION
JUNE 20, 2022
14 Ranney VFD
30,000
Water main replacement - Front Street (G to I Street)
150,000
Surge protection (design)
70,000
Large valve replacements
100,000
CIP budget
1,331,556
The City has been working with Johnson Controls to design a project to replace the current water meters (most of which are 40 years old) and implement an automated meter reading system. This project will be presented to the Council at an upcoming meeting. If approved, this project is anticipated to be debt financed. The current Water Fund loan will be paid off in 2024. Estimated debt financing of the water meter project should be similar to the current annual loan payment.
FY 2021-22
Budget
FY 2021-22
Estimated
FY 2022-23
Proposed
Revenues (net of CIP transfers)
2,885,295
2,947,245
2,818,992
Operating expenses (net of CIP transfers)
2,449,015
2,245,451
2,536,283
CIP
1,164,966
38,733
1,331,556
Debt service
350,000
350,000
350,000
Net
(1,078,686)
313,061
(1,398,847)
Ending working capital
1,947,437
3,339,184
1,940,337
American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA)
The American Rescue Plan Act was passed in March 2021 and includes funding allocated to cities to respond to and recover from the COVID-19 pandemic. Crescent City will be allocated approximately $1.6 million. Based on discussions with the City Council and Measure S Oversight Committee at the March 15, 2022 priorities workshop and the FY 22-23 budget workshop, these funds will be allocated to fund economic development staffing and operations, partial funding of Front Street, and partial funding of the pool HVAC / dehumidification project. Estimated amounts are included in the proposed budget and will be updated as exact costs become known.
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23 BUDGET ADOPTION
JUNE 20, 2022
15 Appropriations Limit (GANN Limit)
In 1979, the voters of California approved Proposition 4, commonly known as the Gann Limit (“Limit” or “Appropriations Limit”), to limit the growth of government taxation and spending. This proposition created Article XIIIB of the Constitution, which provides a formula for calculating these limits. In 1990, the voters adopted Proposition 111, which revises the formulas for calculating adjustments to the limit.
The limit is based on actual appropriations during the base year and increases each year using specified growth factors. The appropriations limit does not apply to all City revenues, but only to those revenues defined as “proceeds of taxes” with certain exceptions for voter-approved debt, qualified capital outlay, and the costs of complying with court orders and federal mandates. During any fiscal year, a government entity may not appropriate (spend) proceeds of taxes that are received in excess of the entity’s limit.
If the entity receives proceeds of taxes in excess of the limit, it may carry those funds into the subsequent year for use. Any excess remaining after the second year must be returned to the taxpayers by reducing tax rates or fees. Alternatively, a majority of voters may approve an override to increase the appropriations limit for a maximum of four years.
In accordance with Proposition 111, the Council must adopt the Appropriations Limit each year as part of the annual budget process. The annual change in the limit is determined by two factors: (1) change in population and (2) change in cost of living (inflation).
Population factor: The population figures are provided to the City each year by the State Department of Finance. The City may choose to use either the population growth figure for the City’s population or the growth figure for the County’s population. For FY 2022-23, the City population factor is -0.88% and the County factor is -0.56%. Staff recommends using the County factor.
Inflation factor: The City may use the California per Capita Income figure (provided by the State Department of Finance) or the percentage change in the local assessment roll from the preceding year due to the addition of local non-residential construction in the City.
The City has used the California per Capita Income figure in previous years, and staff continues to recommend this action. This year’s per capita income factor is 7.55%.
The total calculated appropriations limit for FY 2022-23, using the recommended factors, is $34,838,769 which is an increase of $2,263,255 over the FY 2021-22 limit. Only the General Fund includes budgeted revenues properly classified as proceeds of taxes, although the other types of funds are also presented consistent with previous years.
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23 BUDGET ADOPTION
JUNE 20, 2022
16 FISCAL ANALYSIS
The effects of the proposed budget on the City’s major funds are discussed above. Below is a chart summarizing the proposed budget for each City fund (not including fiduciary funds). The projected ending fund balance / working capital is calculated as the estimated ending fund balance for the current fiscal year plus the net impact of the proposed budget for FY 2022-23 (not including any budget-to-actual savings for FY 2022-23). It is important to note that projections are only an estimate, and actual results will vary from projections.
This chart is included with additional details in the attached budget document. % Change
over prior year
A. Price Factor
Per capita personal income 2022-23 7.55%
Population Factor
City 2022-23 -0.88%
County 2022-23 -0.56%
B. Calculation
Per capita personal income ratio 1.0755
Population ratio 0.9944
Calculation of factor for FY 2022-23 A times B 1.0695
2021-22 2022-23 2022-23 2022-23 2022-23 2022-23
Limit Limit
Proceeds of
Taxes
Exclusions Appropriations
Subject to Limit
Under (Over)
Limit
General Fund 6,391,539 6,835,606 6,421,832 (1,097,534) 5,324,298 1,511,308 Special Revenue Funds 6,242,320 6,676,019 - - - 6,676,019 Enterprise Funds 15,969,184 17,078,678 - - - 17,078,678 Internal Service Funds 1,839,543 1,967,350 - - - 1,967,350 Public Financing Authority 1,560,913 1,669,361 - - - 1,669,361 Fiduciary Funds 572,014 611,756 - - - 611,756
32,575,514 34,838,769 6,421,832 (1,097,534) 5,324,298 29,514,471 APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT: Fiscal Year 2022-23
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23 BUDGET ADOPTION
JUNE 20, 2022
17 STRATEGIC PLAN ASSESSMENT
This report is consistent with the Strategic Plan Goal of “Maintaining a balanced budget while executing strong fiscal management, optimized staffing levels, and through maximizing services with available resources.”
ATTACHMENTS
• Resolution No. 2022-44, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Crescent City Adopting the Annual Budget, including any Attachments and/or Appendices, for Fiscal Year 2022-23
• Resolution No. 2022-45, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Crescent City Selecting the Annual Adjustment Factors for the Calculation of the 2022-23 Appropriations Limit for the City of Crescent City Proposed Proposed Proposed Estimated
Revenues Expenditures Net Activity
Working
Capital or
Fund Balance *
FY 2022-23 FY 2022-23 FY 2022-23 @ 6/30/23
General Fund
001 General Fund 9,020,482 (10,393,380) (1,372,898) 2,219,930 Special Revenue Funds
104 CDBG Program Income (PI) 1,500 (1,500) - 1,500
106 Rehab and Sidewalk Loans - - - 89,871
107 2003/04 CDBG Loan Program - (1,500) (1,500) 37,588
152 CDBG 17-CDBG-12092 - - - -
153 2020 CDBG 1,087,862 (1,087,862) - -
154 CDBG COVID 336,146 (336,146) - -
110 Housing Authority 4,374,671 (4,357,292) 17,379 434,687 115 Gas Tax 220,513 (220,513) - 17,465
116 Successor Housing - - - 407,394
117 RMRA 174,220 (199,617) (25,397) 16,277
120 American Rescue Plan Act 1,358,201 (1,358,201) - -
Enterprise Funds
412 RV Park 519,500 (583,004) (63,504) 353,061
413 Sewer 5,312,491 (7,064,022) (1,751,531) 2,546,709
913 Sewer CIP 742,000 (1,813,000) (1,071,000) 138,148
419 Water 2,818,992 (3,106,283) (287,291) 1,914,299
919 Water CIP 220,000 (1,331,556) (1,111,556) 26,038
Internal Service Funds
420 Info Tech Services 371,116 (371,116) - -
506 Building Services 266,170 (266,170) - -
508 Equipment Services 612,343 (612,343) - 91,515
620 Insurance Reserve 374,191 (427,291) (53,100) 57,702 630 OPEB 144,237 (144,237) - -
Capital Project & Acquisition Funds
901 Capital Improvement Projects 8,532,881 (9,980,879) (1,447,998) 44,512 902 Beachfront Park Donations - - - 1,070
930 Fire Vehicle Replacement 38,000 - 38,000 190,697
940 Police Vehicle Replacement 120,000 (120,000) - -
FISCAL YEAR 2022-23 BUDGET ADOPTION
JUNE 20, 2022
18 • Resolution No. 2022-46, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Crescent City Updating Wages for Certain Positions
• Resolution No. 2022-47, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Crescent City Approving a General Fund Reserve Policy
• Fiscal Year 2022-23 proposed budget
• Appropriations limit factors from State Department of Finance CITY OF CRESCENT CITY RESOLUTION NO. 2022-44 Page 1
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-44
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CRESCENT CITY
ADOPTING THE ANNUAL BUDGET OF THE CITY OF CRESCENT CITY, INCLUDING ANY ATTACHMENTS AND/OR APPENDICES, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-23
WHEREAS, the budget for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2022 and ending June 30, 2023, as submitted by the City Manager, has been reviewed by the City Council and a duly-noticed public hearing held thereon the 20th day of June 2022.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CRESCENT CITY, CALIFORNIA AS FOLLOWS:
1. That the Fiscal Year 2022-23 City of Crescent City Annual Budget is hereby appropriated in the amounts identified below:
Fund Expense / Expenditure
General Fund 10,393,380
Special Revenue Funds 7,408,706
Enterprise Funds (including Enterprise CIP) 13,897,865
Internal Service Funds 1,821,157
General CIP Funds 9,946,954
Fiduciary Funds 150,000
Total 43,618,062
2. That the appropriated amounts do not include depreciation;
3. That the appropriated amounts do include transfers between funds;
4. That the unused appropriations at the end of Fiscal Year 2021-22 for capital projects, special projects, and grant projects that are unfinished and continuing into Fiscal Year 2022-23 shall be carried forward and become part of the Fiscal Year 2022-23 budget;
5. That during the Fiscal Year 2022-23, the annual budget may be amended by modification action when such amendments do not exceed the Appropriations Limit as calculated and set forth pursuant to Article XIIB of the Constitution of the State of California;
6. That during the Fiscal Year 2022-23, the General Fund and other previously authorized funds are hereby established in said budget, provided however, that additional funds may be established by appropriate action;
7. That the Position Control in the attached budget document is hereby approved; CITY OF CRESCENT CITY RESOLUTION NO. 2022-44 Page 2
8. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 2.08.050 of the Crescent City Municipal Code, the City Manager shall administer said budget in accordance with the appropriate provisions of the ordinances and resolutions of the City;
9. That during the Fiscal Year 2022-23, the City Manager may authorize budget transfers between various expense categories within the same fund and department;
10. That the Director of Finance / Treasurer is hereby authorized to execute interfund transfers during the course of the fiscal year in accordance with the budget;
11. That a true and correct copy of the Fiscal Year 2022-23 Annual Budget shall be filed in the office of the City Clerk.
PASSED AND ADOPTED and made effective the same day by the City Council of the City of Crescent City on this 20th day of June 2022, by the following polled vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
_______________________________
Jason Greenough, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________
Robin Patch, City Clerk
CITY OF CRESCENT CITY RESOLUTION NO. 2022-45 Page 1
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-45
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CRESCENT CITY, CALIFORNIA SELECTING THE ANNUAL ADJUSTMENT FACTORS FOR THE CALCULATION OF THE 2022-23
APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR THE CITY OF CRESCENT CITY
WHEREAS, Article XIII B of the California Constitution does specify that the Appropriations Limit for cities may increase annually if selection of the adjustment factors for calculation thereof has been made; and
WHEREAS, the net change in the total county population or the net change in the total city population may be selected for the population adjustment factor; and WHEREAS, the change in California per capita personal income or the change in the local assessment roll due to local non-residential construction may be selected for the inflationary adjustment factor.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Crescent City as follows:
1. The net change in total county population and the change in California per capita personal income are hereby selected as the annual adjustment factors for calculation of the 2022-23 Appropriations Limit for Crescent City, California.
2. The annual appropriations limit for fiscal year 2022-23 is $34,838,769.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that in the absence of the data necessary to calculate the increase in the non-residential assessed valuation, the fiscal year 2022-23 Appropriations Limit for Crescent City is hereby adopted on a provisional basis using the alternative factor of per capita income for the inflationary adjustment and may need to be adjusted once the assessment data is available.
The above and foregoing Resolution No. 2022-45 was introduced by Council Member ________________, seconded by Council Member _______________ and passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Crescent City held on the 20th day of June 2022 by the following polled vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Jason Greenough, Mayor
ATTEST:
Robin Patch, City Clerk
CITY OF CRESCENT CITY RESOLUTION NO. 2022-46 Page 1
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-46
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CRESCENT CITY REVISING
THE SALARY SCHEDULE FOR CERTAIN CONTRACT POSITIONS
WHEREAS, the Crescent City Municipal Code provides that the City Council set employee compensation by resolution; and
WHEREAS, the City has certain employees who are under contract and are not represented by an employee bargaining unit, and those contracts specify that contract employees shall receive the same Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA) as that received by the Crescent City Management Employees Association (CCMEA); and
WHEREAS, under the current Memorandum of Understanding, the CCMEA will receive a 3% COLA effective the first full pay period in July 2022, and best practice is to clearly state the new salary ranges for contract employees.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CRESCENT CITY AS FOLLOWS:
That the salary ranges for contract employees listed below is approved and effective as of the first full pay period in July 2022:
APPROVED and ADOPTED and made effective the same day at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Crescent City held on the 20th day of June 2022 by the following polled vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
_______________________________
Jason Greenough, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________
Robin Patch, City Clerk
Annual Min Annual Max
City Manager 107,641 137,542
City Attorney 102,259 128,202
Fire Chief 94,709 118,735
Chief of Police 94,709 118,735
Public Works Director 94,709 118,735
Finance Director 94,709 118,735
Housing Authority Director 89,055 111,671
Econ Dev / Rec Director 89,055 111,671
CITY OF CRESCENT CITY RESOLUTION NO. 2022-47 Page 1
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-47
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CRESCENT CITY APPROVING
A GENERAL FUND RESERVE POLICY
WHEREAS, best practice and prudent financial management recommend the adoption of a policy setting forth goals for the General Fund reserve; and WHEREAS, the General Fund reserve policy was last adopted in 2013 and requires updating; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to clarify the policy and ensure it reflects current best practice.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CRESCENT CITY AS FOLLOWS:
1. The purpose of the General Fund reserve is to maintain operations for a minimum of 90 days in the event of an emergency or disruption in revenues.
2. The calculation of the reserve is to be based on 25% of budgeted operating expenses.
3. Operating expenses do not include one-time projects that are reimbursed by grants, capital expenditures, or transfers to capital improvement funds.
4. Based on historical trends, it is prudent and reasonable when estimating future reserve balances to assume 5% of the operating budget will not be spent.
5. This policy does not prevent the Council from allocating funds from the reserve, even if such allocations would reduce the reserve below the goal of 25% of operating expenses.
6. This policy does not prevent the Council from maintaining a General Fund reserve greater than 25% of operating expenses.
7. This policy replaces any previously adopted General Fund reserve policy.
8. This policy may be updated as needed by the City Council.
APPROVED and ADOPTED and made effective the same day at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Crescent City held on the 20th day of June 2022 by the following polled vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
_______________________________
Jason Greenough, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________
Robin Patch, City Clerk
City of Crescent City
Original Budget
Fiscal Year 2022-23
* DRAFT *
* Subject to change by future Council resolution
Public Hearing: June 20, 2022
Adopted by Resolution 2022-44
Budget Resolution 2 - 3
Organizational Chart 4
Council Members 5
Projected Fund Balances 6
Fund #
001 General Fund 8 - 26
Special Revenue Funds
104 CDBG Program Income 28
106 Rehab & Sidewalk Loans 29
107 CDBG Rehab Loans 30
150 CDBG 2014 31
151 CDBG 2016 32
152 CDBG 2017 33
153 CDBG 2020 34
154 CDBG Covid 35
110 Housing Authority 36
115 Gas Tax (HUTA) 37
116 Successor Housing 38
117 Gas Tax (Road Maint & Rehabilitation Account) 39
119 CARES Act 40
120 American Rescue Plan Act 41
Enterprise Funds
412 RV Park 43
413 + 913 Sewer 44 - 52
419 + 919 Water 53 - 58
Internal Service Funds
420 Information Services 60
506 Building Maintenance 61
508 Equipment 62
620 Insurance 63
630 OPEB 64
General (Non-Enterprise) CIP
901 General CIP 66 - 67
902 Beachfront Park Donations CIP 68
930 Fire Vehicle Replacement 69
940 Police Vehicle Replacement 70
Fiduciary Funds
991 RDA Successor Agency 72
Cost Allocations 74 - 79
Interfund Transfers 81
Position Control 83
Appropriations Limit 85 - 86
Measure S Oversight Committee Recommendations 88 - 93
City of Crescent City
FY 2022-23 Annual Budget
* DRAFT * 1
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-XX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CRESCENT CITY
ADOPTING THE ANNUAL BUDGET OF THE CITY OF CRESCENT CITY, INCLUDING ANY ATTACHMENTS AND/OR APPENDICES, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-23
WHEREAS, the budget for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2022, as submitted by the City Manager, has been reviewed by the City Council and a public hearing held thereon the 20th day of June 2022
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CRESCENT CITY, CALIFORNIA AS FOLLOWS:
1. That the Fiscal Year 2022-23 City of Crescent City Annual Budget is hereby appropriated in the amounts identified below:
Fund Expense / Expenditure
General Fund 10,393,380
Special Revenue Funds 7,408,706
Enterprise Funds (including Enterprise CIP) 13,897,865
Internal Service Funds 1,821,157
General CIP Funds 9,946,954
Fiduciary Funds 150,000
Total 43,618,062
2. That the appropriated amounts do not include depreciation;
3. That the appropriated amounts do include transfers between funds;
4. That the unused appropriations at the end of Fiscal Year 2021-22 for capital projects, special projects, and grant projects that are unfinished and continuing into Fiscal Year 2022-23 shall be carried forward and become part of the Fiscal Year 2022-23 budget;
5. That during the Fiscal Year 2022-23, the annual budget may be amended by modification action when such amendments do not exceed the Appropriations Limit as calculated and set forth pursuant to Article XIIB of the Constitution of the State of California;
6. That during the Fiscal Year 2022-23, the General Fund and other previously authorized funds are hereby established in said budget, provided however, that additional funds may be established by appropriate action;
7. That the Position Control in the attached budget document is hereby approved; * DRAFT * 2
8. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 2.08.050 of the Crescent City Municipal Code, the City Manager shall administer said budget in accordance with the appropriate provisions of the ordinances and resolutions of the City;
9. That during the Fiscal Year 2022-23, the City Manager may authorize budget transfers between various expense categories within the same fund and department;
10. That the Director of Finance / Treasurer is hereby authorized to execute interfund transfers during the course of the fiscal year in accordance with the budget;
11. That a true and correct copy of the Fiscal Year 2022-23 Annual Budget shall be filed in the office of the City Clerk.
PASSED AND ADOPTED and made effective the same day by the City Council of the City of Crescent City on this 20th day of June 2022, by the following polled vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
_______________________________
Jason Greenough, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________
Robin Patch, City Clerk
* DRAFT * 3
City of Crescent City
FY 2022-23 Organizational Chart
Residents
City Council
City
Attorney
City
Manager
Police
Fire
Public Works
Econ Dev /
Recreation /
Grants
Community
Development
Housing
Authority
Admin
Finance
Commissions &
Committees
* Planning
* Housing Advisory
* Measure S
Oversight
* DRAFT * 4
Jason Greenough Mayor
Isaiah Wright Mayor Pro Tem
Raymond Altman Council Member
Blake Inscore Council Member
Beau Smith Council Member
City of Crescent City
FY 2022-23 Annual Budget
* DRAFT * 5
City of Crescent City FY 2022-23 Budget
Fund Summaries
Audited Budgeted Budgeted Estimated ** Estimated ** Proposed Proposed Proposed Estimated Working Capital
or
Fund Balance *
Net Activity
Working Capital
or
Fund Balance *
Net Activity
Working Capital
or
Fund Balance *
Revenues Expenditures Net Activity
Working Capital
or
Fund Balance *
@ 6/30/21 FY 2021-22 @ 6/30/22 FY 2021-22 @ 6/30/22 FY 2022-23 FY 2022-23 FY 2022-23 @ 6/30/23 General Fund
001 General Fund 3,497,519 (626,642) 2,870,877 95,309 3,592,828 9,020,482 (10,393,380) (1,372,898) 2,219,930 Special Revenue Funds
104 CDBG Program Income (PI) 1,569 - 1,569 (69) 1,500 1,500 (1,500) - 1,500 106 Rehab and Sidewalk Loans 89,871 100 89,971 - 89,871 - - - 89,871 107 2003/04 CDBG Loan Program 40,588 (7,800) 32,788 (1,500) 39,088 - (1,500) (1,500) 37,588 152 CDBG 17-CDBG-12092 (898,672) 182,863 (715,809) 898,672 - - - - - 153 2020 CDBG (59,947) 59,950 3 59,947 - 1,087,862 (1,087,862) - - 154 CDBG COVID (10,395) 10,395 - 10,395 - 336,146 (336,146) - - 110 Housing Authority 439,848 (22,540) 417,308 (22,540) 417,308 4,374,671 (4,357,292) 17,379 434,687 115 Gas Tax 17,465 - 17,465 - 17,465 220,513 (220,513) - 17,465 116 Successor Housing 407,394 - 407,394 - 407,394 - - - 407,394 117 RMRA 160,594 (118,920) 41,674 (118,920) 41,674 174,220 (199,617) (25,397) 16,277 120 American Rescue Plan Act - 731,147 731,147 - - 1,204,276 (1,204,276) - - Enterprise Funds
412 RV Park 369,164 (107,060) 262,104 47,401 416,565 519,500 (583,004) (63,504) 353,061 413 Sewer 5,079,747 (1,352,374) 3,727,373 (781,507) 4,298,240 5,312,491 (7,064,022) (1,751,531) 2,546,709 913 Sewer CIP 608,148 (560,204) 47,944 601,000 1,209,148 742,000 (1,813,000) (1,071,000) 138,148 419 Water 2,823,354 (887,278) 1,936,076 (621,764) 2,201,590 2,818,992 (3,106,283) (287,291) 1,914,299 919 Water CIP 202,769 (191,408) 11,361 934,825 1,137,594 220,000 (1,331,556) (1,111,556) 26,038 Internal Service Funds
420 Info Tech Services - - - - - 371,116 (371,116) - -
506 Building Services - - - - - 266,170 (266,170) - -
508 Equipment Services 91,515 - 91,515 - 91,515 612,343 (612,343) - 91,515 620 Insurance Reserve 193,511 (153,093) 40,418 (82,709) 110,802 374,191 (427,291) (53,100) 57,702 630 OPEB - - - - - 144,237 (144,237) - -
Capital Project & Acquisition Funds
901 Capital Improvement Projects (581,427) 353,687 (227,740) 2,073,937 1,492,510 8,378,956 (9,826,954) (1,447,998) 44,512 902 Beachfront Park Donations 1,070 - 1,070 - 1,070 - - - 1,070 930 Fire Vehicle Replacement 54,697 98,000 152,697 98,000 152,697 38,000 - 38,000 190,697 940 Police Vehicle Replacement 18,297 (18,300) (3) (18,297) - 120,000 (120,000) - - .
* General Fund, Special Revenue, and General Capital Funds show Fund Balance. Enterprise Funds and Internal Service Funds show Working Capital.
Audited Budgeted Budgeted Estimated ** Estimated ** Proposed Proposed Proposed Estimated Fund Balance Net Activity Fund Balance Net Activity Fund Balance Revenues Expenditures Net Activity Fund Balance @ 6/30/21 FY 2021-22 @ 6/30/22 FY 2021-22 @ 6/30/22 FY 2022-23 FY 2022-23 FY 2022-23 @ 6/30/23 Fiduciary Funds
991 Successor Agency (603,826) (12,604) (616,430) (5,000) (608,826) 87,000 - 87,000 (521,826) ** Projected activity is an estimate only, based on year-to-date experience. Actual results will not be known until the fiscal year ends and the audit is complete. Results may vary from estimated amounts. * DRAFT * 6
General Fund
* DRAFT * 7
City of Crescent City FY 2022-23 Budget
Fund: 001 General Fund
Dept: n/a General Fund - All Cost Centers Combined
FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Var Var Actual Actual Actual Budget Estimated Proposed $ %
Operating Sources
Taxes 3,775,287 3,532,340 4,813,919 6,654,700 6,697,501 6,374,200 (323,301) -5% Special Assessments - - - - - - -
Licenses & Permits 351,552 372,256 338,553 325,300 314,179 325,300 11,121 4% Fines & Penalties 5,679 31,449 8,126 7,000 8,282 7,000 (1,282) -15% Other Operating Sources 70,635 137,567 148,288 131,687 168,841 141,780 (27,061) -16% Operating Grants/Contributions 431,297 235,795 496,196 617,083 420,501 576,358 155,857 37% Charges for Services 775,003 649,986 403,577 731,999 602,958 967,495 364,537 60% Subtotal 5,409,453 4,959,393 6,208,659 8,467,769 8,212,262 8,392,133 179,871 2% Financing Sources
Interest Income 63,872 52,282 2,824 20,000 (39,166) 7,000 46,166 -118% Debt Proceeds - - - - - - -
Other Financing Sources - - - - - - -
Subtotal 63,872 52,282 2,824 20,000 (39,166) 7,000 46,166 -118% Capital Sources
Capital Leases/Rentals 30,513 28,264 29,413 30,182 30,182 30,182 - 0% Capital Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Gain on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal 30,513 28,264 29,413 30,182 30,182 30,182 - 0% Internal Sources
Interfund Transfers In 138,053 186,290 884,661 362,144 321,068 355,580 34,512 11% Interfund Loans In - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Provided 153,371 186,785 202,074 225,066 217,165 235,587 18,422 8% Subtotal 291,424 373,075 1,086,735 587,210 538,233 591,167 52,934 10% TOTAL SOURCES 5,795,262 5,413,014 7,327,631 9,105,161 8,741,511 9,020,482 278,971 3% Operating Uses
Wages & Salaries 2,131,450 2,174,551 1,953,733 2,513,299 2,439,696 3,130,911 691,215 28% Employee Benefits 1,346,450 1,417,792 1,420,039 1,783,115 1,574,541 2,159,865 585,324 37% Utilities & Telephone 319,721 241,905 204,714 343,010 287,663 335,959 48,296 17% Materials & Supplies 421,896 557,701 298,617 700,151 477,722 867,984 390,262 82% Contracts & Services 484,289 767,617 702,518 1,534,824 1,154,702 1,419,141 264,439 23% Employee Support 70,710 71,632 38,319 184,493 101,602 210,644 109,042 107% Grants/Contributions to Others 151,769 147,844 132,861 140,000 139,853 163,000 23,147 17% Other Operating Uses 213,250 165,925 152,871 208,181 162,896 196,242 33,346 20% Subtotal 5,139,535 5,544,967 4,903,672 7,407,073 6,338,675 8,483,746 2,145,071 34% Capital Uses
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Equipment - - - - - - -
Capital Improvements - - - - - - -
Loss on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Financing Uses
Debt Principal Repaid - - - - - - -
Debt Interest Paid - - 6,615 - - 65,000 65,000
Other Financing Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - 6,615 - - 65,000 65,000
Internal Uses
Interfund Transfers Out 2,958 656,738 12,255 1,931,530 1,931,483 1,416,134 (515,349) -27% Interfund Loans Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Used 300,037 382,634 335,141 393,200 376,044 428,500 52,456 14% Subtotal 302,995 1,039,372 347,396 2,324,730 2,307,527 1,844,634 (462,893) -20% Extraordinary Items
Extraordinary Item - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL USES 5,442,530 6,584,339 5,257,683 9,731,803 8,646,202 10,393,380 1,747,178 20% NET 352,732 (1,171,325) 2,069,948 (626,642) 95,309 (1,372,898) (1,468,207) -1540% ENDING FUND BALANCE 2,598,700 1,427,571 3,497,519 2,870,877 3,592,828 2,219,930 (1,372,898) -38% * DRAFT * 8
City of Crescent City FY 2022-23 Budget
Fund: 001 General Fund
Dept: 000 Non-Departmental
FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Var Var Actual Actual Actual Budget Estimated Proposed $ %
Operating Sources
Taxes 3,775,287 3,532,340 4,813,919 6,654,700 6,697,501 6,374,200 (280,500) -4% Special Assessments - - - - - - -
Licenses & Permits 282,917 288,018 259,659 259,650 254,820 259,650 - 0% Fines & Penalties 906 25,917 4,868 1,000 1,931 1,000 - 0% Other Operating Sources 8,760 (1,124) 2,141 10,150 7,252 10,150 - 0% Operating Grants/Contributions 584 - 33,907 - 5,892 - - Charges for Services - - - - - - -
Subtotal 4,068,454 3,845,151 5,114,494 6,925,500 6,967,396 6,645,000 (280,500) -4% Financing Sources
Interest Income 63,872 52,282 2,824 20,000 (39,166) 7,000 (13,000) -65% Debt Proceeds - - - - - - -
Other Financing Sources - - - - - - -
Subtotal 63,872 52,282 2,824 20,000 (39,166) 7,000 (13,000) -65% Capital Sources
Capital Leases/Rentals 30,513 28,264 29,413 30,182 30,182 30,182 - 0% Capital Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Gain on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal 30,513 28,264 29,413 30,182 30,182 30,182 - 0% Internal Sources
Interfund Transfers In - 6,059 57,731 - - - -
Interfund Loans In - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Provided - - - - - - -
Subtotal - 6,059 57,731 - - - -
TOTAL SOURCES 4,162,839 3,931,756 5,204,462 6,975,682 6,958,412 6,682,182 (293,500) -4% Operating Uses
Wages & Salaries - - - - - - -
Employee Benefits - - - - - - -
Utilities & Telephone - - - - - - -
Materials & Supplies - - - - - - -
Contracts & Services - - - - - - -
Employee Support - - - - - - -
Grants/Contributions to Others - - - - - - -
Other Operating Uses 205,644 160,568 150,777 199,589 156,865 185,650 (13,939) -7% Subtotal 205,644 160,568 150,777 199,589 156,865 185,650 (13,939) -7% Capital Uses
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Equipment - - - - - - -
Capital Improvements - - - - - - -
Loss on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Financing Uses
Debt Principal Repaid - - - - - -
Debt Interest Paid - - 6,615 - - 65,000 65,000
Other Financing Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - 6,615 - - 65,000 65,000
Internal Uses
Interfund Transfers Out - - - 144,284 144,284 - (144,284) -100% Interfund Loans Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Used - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - 144,284 144,284 - (144,284) -100%
Extraordinary Items
Extraordinary Item - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL USES 205,644 160,568 157,392 343,873 301,149 250,650 (93,223) -27% NET 3,957,195 3,771,188 5,047,070 6,631,809 6,657,263 6,431,532 (200,277) -3% * DRAFT * 9
City of Crescent City FY 2022-23 Budget
Fund: 001 General Fund
Dept: 110 City Council
FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Var Var Actual Actual Actual Budget Estimated Proposed $ %
Operating Sources
Taxes - - - - - - -
Special Assessments - - - - - - -
Licenses & Permits - - - - - - -
Fines & Penalties - - - - - - -
Other Operating Sources - - 6,721 - - - -
Operating Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Charges for Services - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - 6,721 - - - -
Financing Sources
Interest Income - - - - - - -
Debt Proceeds - - - - - - -
Other Financing Sources - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Capital Sources
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Gain on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Sources
Interfund Transfers In - - - - - - -
Interfund Loans In - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Provided 58,001 56,369 62,041 83,746 75,702 92,065 16,363 22% Subtotal 58,001 56,369 62,041 83,746 75,702 92,065 16,363 22% TOTAL SOURCES 58,001 56,369 68,762 83,746 75,702 92,065 16,363 22% Operating Uses
Wages & Salaries 37,267 36,938 37,596 36,655 36,655 36,655 - 0% Employee Benefits 38,591 38,986 56,518 69,856 69,543 78,839 9,296 13% Utilities & Telephone 2,553 2,089 2,265 2,645 2,249 2,645 396 18% Materials & Supplies 507 494 700 1,500 729 4,750 4,021 552% Contracts & Services - - 330 - - -
Employee Support 6,375 4,387 550 12,500 2,149 12,500 10,351 482% Grants/Contributions to Others - - - - - - -
Other Operating Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal 85,293 82,894 97,959 123,156 111,325 135,389 24,064 22% Capital Uses
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Equipment - - - - - - -
Capital Improvements - - - - - - -
Loss on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Financing Uses
Debt Principal Repaid - - - - - - -
Debt Interest Paid - - - - - - -
Other Financing Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Uses
Interfund Transfers Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Loans Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Used 4,787 4,901 4,367 4,851 4,479 5,939 1,460 33% Subtotal 4,787 4,901 4,367 4,851 4,479 5,939 1,460 33%
Extraordinary Items
Extraordinary Item - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL USES 90,080 87,795 102,326 128,007 115,804 141,328 25,524 22% NET (32,079) (31,426) (33,564) (44,261) (40,102) (49,263) (9,161) 23% * DRAFT * 10
City of Crescent City FY 2022-23 Budget
Fund: 001 General Fund
Dept: 111 City Manager
FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Var Var Actual Actual Actual Budget Estimated Proposed $ %
Operating Sources
Taxes - - - - - - -
Special Assessments - - - - - - -
Licenses & Permits - - - - - - -
Fines & Penalties - - - - - - -
Other Operating Sources - - 54 - - - -
Operating Grants/Contributions 1,000 - 29,294 135,000 40,000 90,000 50,000 125% Charges for Services - - - - - - -
Subtotal 1,000 - 29,348 135,000 40,000 90,000 50,000 125% Financing Sources
Interest Income - - - - - - -
Debt Proceeds - - - - - - -
Other Financing Sources - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Capital Sources
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Gain on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Sources
Interfund Transfers In - - - - - - -
Interfund Loans In - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Provided - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL SOURCES 1,000 - 29,348 135,000 40,000 90,000 50,000 125% Operating Uses
Wages & Salaries 24,188 38,776 35,917 39,580 39,019 43,184 4,165 11% Employee Benefits 16,560 21,576 22,027 21,686 22,659 21,172 (1,487) -7% Utilities & Telephone 5,167 770 727 1,105 726 762 36 5% Materials & Supplies 339 255 197 431 283 931 648 229%
Contracts & Services 4,071 43,063 31,919 136,085 40,000 91,000 51,000 128% Employee Support 2,658 3,049 1,962 4,901 2,485 4,689 2,204 89% Grants/Contributions to Others - - - - - - -
Other Operating Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal 52,983 107,489 92,749 203,788 105,172 161,738 56,566 54% Capital Uses
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Equipment - - - - - - -
Capital Improvements - - - - - - -
Loss on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Financing Uses
Debt Principal Repaid - - - - - - -
Debt Interest Paid - - - - - - -
Other Financing Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Uses
Interfund Transfers Out - - - 150,000 150,000 - (150,000) -100% Interfund Loans Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Used 4,492 5,965 5,976 6,415 5,766 6,155 389 7% Subtotal 4,492 5,965 5,976 156,415 155,766 6,155 (149,611) -96% Extraordinary Items
Extraordinary Item - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL USES 57,475 113,454 98,725 360,203 260,938 167,893 (93,045) -36% NET (56,475) (113,454) (69,377) (225,203) (220,938) (77,893) 143,045 -65% * DRAFT * 11
City of Crescent City FY 2022-23 Budget
Fund: 001 General Fund
Dept: 112 Economic Dev / Community Support / Grants
FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Var Var Actual Actual Actual Budget Estimated Proposed $ %
Operating Sources
Taxes - - - - - - -
Special Assessments - - - - - - -
Licenses & Permits - - - - - - -
Fines & Penalties - - - - - - -
Other Operating Sources - 354 - - - - -
Operating Grants/Contributions - - - - - 1,000 1,000
Charges for Services - - - - - - -
Subtotal - 354 - - - 1,000 1,000
Financing Sources
Interest Income - - - - - - -
Debt Proceeds - - - - - - -
Other Financing Sources - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Capital Sources
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Gain on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Sources
Interfund Transfers In - - - 54,372 40,682 113,802 73,120 180% Interfund Loans In - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Provided - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - 54,372 40,682 113,802 73,120 180%
TOTAL SOURCES - 354 - 54,372 40,682 114,802 74,120 182% Operating Uses
Wages & Salaries 2,634 3,690 3,984 33,140 26,390 69,125 42,735 162% Employee Benefits 2,130 2,517 2,708 13,554 10,854 37,543 26,689 246% Utilities & Telephone - - - 174 173 943 770 445%
Materials & Supplies 4,188 7,168 407 19,763 13,996 22,018 8,022 57% Contracts & Services - - 5 18,000 11,790 48,896 37,106 315% Employee Support - - - 2,410 1,205 2,505 1,300 108%
Grants/Contributions to Others 92,000 88,000 73,008 80,000 80,000 103,000 23,000 29% Other Operating Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal 100,952 101,375 80,112 167,041 144,408 284,030 139,622 97% Capital Uses
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Equipment - - - - - - -
Capital Improvements - - - - - - -
Loss on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Financing Uses
Debt Principal Repaid - - - - - - -
Debt Interest Paid - - - - - - -
Other Financing Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Uses
Interfund Transfers Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Loans Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Used 226 383 353 404 374 5,485 5,111 1367% Subtotal 226 383 353 404 374 5,485 5,111 1367%
Extraordinary Items
Extraordinary Item - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL USES 101,178 101,758 80,465 167,445 144,782 289,515 144,733 100% NET (101,178) (101,404) (80,465) (113,073) (104,100) (174,713) (70,613) 68% * DRAFT * 12
City of Crescent City FY 2022-23 Budget
Fund: 001 General Fund
Dept: 113 City Clerk
FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Var Var Actual Actual Actual Budget Estimated Proposed $ %
Operating Sources
Taxes - - - - - - -
Special Assessments - - - - - - -
Licenses & Permits - - - - - - -
Fines & Penalties - - - - - - -
Other Operating Sources 6,728 8,364 14,649 - 5,200 - (5,200) -100% Operating Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Charges for Services - - - - - - -
Subtotal 6,728 8,364 14,649 - 5,200 - (5,200) -100%
Financing Sources
Interest Income - - - - - - -
Debt Proceeds - - - - - - -
Other Financing Sources - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Capital Sources
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Gain on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Sources
Interfund Transfers In - - - - - - -
Interfund Loans In - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Provided 95,370 95,951 102,006 101,468 101,178 104,811 3,633 4% Subtotal 95,370 95,951 102,006 101,468 101,178 104,811 3,633 4% TOTAL SOURCES 102,098 104,315 116,655 101,468 106,378 104,811 (1,567) -1% Operating Uses
Wages & Salaries 66,719 71,251 76,822 75,193 76,662 77,449 787 1% Employee Benefits 45,551 43,917 45,759 45,020 43,689 44,373 684 2% Utilities & Telephone 2,375 2,038 1,890 2,449 1,889 2,107 218 12% Materials & Supplies 1,718 2,322 2,186 4,710 3,933 2,660 (1,273) -32% Contracts & Services 20,778 21,181 23,088 16,570 19,295 23,270 3,975 21% Employee Support 3,108 355 265 5,275 3,322 4,275 953 29% Grants/Contributions to Others - - - - - - -
Other Operating Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal 140,249 141,064 150,010 149,217 148,790 154,134 5,344 4% Capital Uses
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Equipment - - - - - - -
Capital Improvements - - - - - - -
Loss on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Financing Uses
Debt Principal Repaid - - - - - - -
Debt Interest Paid - - - - - - -
Other Financing Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Uses
Interfund Transfers Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Loans Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Used 5,073 6,229 5,847 6,417 5,926 6,264 338 6% Subtotal 5,073 6,229 5,847 6,417 5,926 6,264 338 6%
Extraordinary Items
Extraordinary Item - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL USES 145,322 147,293 155,857 155,634 154,716 160,398 5,682 4% NET (43,224) (42,978) (39,202) (54,166) (48,338) (55,587) (7,249) 15% * DRAFT * 13
City of Crescent City FY 2022-23 Budget
Fund: 001 General Fund
Dept: 114 Human Resources and Safety
* Prior to FY 2019-20, HR costs were charged directly to all major funds. Beginning in FY 2019-20, HR includes Safety and is allocated as an ISF.
FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Var Var Actual Actual Actual Budget Estimated Proposed $ %
Operating Sources
Taxes - - - - - - -
Special Assessments - - - - - - -
Licenses & Permits - - - - - - -
Fines & Penalties - - - - - - -
Other Operating Sources - - - 1,000 - - -
Operating Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Charges for Services - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - 1,000 - - -
Financing Sources
Interest Income - - - - - - -
Debt Proceeds - - - - - - -
Other Financing Sources - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Capital Sources
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Gain on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Sources
Interfund Transfers In - 4,736 - 2,600 - 2,600 2,600
Interfund Loans In - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Provided - 34,465 38,027 39,852 40,285 38,711 (1,574) -4% Subtotal - 39,201 38,027 42,452 40,285 41,311 1,026 3%
TOTAL SOURCES - 39,201 38,027 43,452 40,285 41,311 1,026 3% Operating Uses
Wages & Salaries 33,453 60,837 62,713 71,411 76,052 78,010 1,958 3% Employee Benefits 16,140 36,543 36,461 41,560 40,271 41,372 1,101 3% Utilities & Telephone 2,376 3,161 1,890 3,794 1,863 3,249 1,386 74% Materials & Supplies 386 6,822 1,058 6,777 3,533 6,527 2,994 85% Contracts & Services 44 - - 600 575 850 275 48%
Employee Support 831 4,448 1,660 3,410 2,041 4,710 2,669 131% Grants/Contributions to Others - - - - - - -
Other Operating Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal 53,230 111,811 103,782 127,552 124,335 134,718 10,383 8% Capital Uses
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Equipment - - - - - - -
Capital Improvements - - - - - - -
Loss on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Financing Uses
Debt Principal Repaid - - - - - - -
Debt Interest Paid - - - - - - -
Other Financing Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Uses
Interfund Transfers Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Loans Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Used 2,212 5,196 4,840 5,963 5,507 6,139 632 11% Subtotal 2,212 5,196 4,840 5,963 5,507 6,139 632 11%
Extraordinary Items
Extraordinary Item - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL USES 55,442 117,007 108,622 133,515 129,842 140,857 11,015 8% NET (55,442) (77,806) (70,595) (90,063) (89,557) (99,546) (9,989) 11% * DRAFT * 14
City of Crescent City FY 2022-23 Budget
Fund: 001 General Fund
Dept: 120 Finance
FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Var Var Actual Actual Actual Budget Estimated Proposed $ %
Operating Sources
Taxes - - - - - - -
Special Assessments - - - - - - -
Licenses & Permits - - - - - - -
Fines & Penalties 2,100 (1,100) (1,600) - - - -
Other Operating Sources - - - - - - -
Operating Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Charges for Services - - - - - - -
Subtotal 2,100 (1,100) (1,600) - - - -
Financing Sources
Interest Income - - - - - - -
Debt Proceeds - - - - - - -
Other Financing Sources - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Capital Sources
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Gain on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Sources
Interfund Transfers In - - - - - - -
Interfund Loans In - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Provided - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL SOURCES 2,100 (1,100) (1,600) - - - -
Operating Uses
Wages & Salaries 101,505 122,427 110,120 131,160 118,909 133,330 14,421 12% Employee Benefits 65,303 77,553 71,020 76,874 68,857 78,693 9,836 14% Utilities & Telephone 7,452 3,943 3,604 4,500 3,604 4,550 946 26% Materials & Supplies 6,256 14,067 6,327 7,935 8,051 9,360 1,309 16% Contracts & Services 19,286 25,569 25,187 69,754 47,564 49,810 2,246 5% Employee Support 1,920 1,507 316 2,247 1,874 4,595 2,721 145% Grants/Contributions to Others - - - - - - -
Other Operating Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal 201,722 245,066 216,574 292,470 248,859 280,338 31,479 13% Capital Uses
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Equipment - - - - - - -
Capital Improvements - - - - - - -
Loss on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Financing Uses
Debt Principal Repaid - - - - - - -
Debt Interest Paid - - - - - - -
Other Financing Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Uses
Interfund Transfers Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Loans Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Used 7,804 10,252 9,224 10,949 10,114 10,902 788 8% Subtotal 7,804 10,252 9,224 10,949 10,114 10,902 788 8% Extraordinary Items
Extraordinary Item - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL USES 209,526 255,318 225,798 303,419 258,973 291,240 32,267 12% NET (207,426) (256,418) (227,398) (303,419) (258,973) (291,240) (32,267) 12% * DRAFT * 15
City of Crescent City FY 2022-23 Budget
Fund: 001 General Fund
Dept: 130 City Attorney
FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Var Var Actual Actual Actual Budget Estimated Proposed $ %
Operating Sources
Taxes - - - - - - -
Special Assessments - - - - - - -
Licenses & Permits - - - - - - -
Fines & Penalties - - - - - - -
Other Operating Sources - - 1,476 - - - -
Operating Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Charges for Services - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - 1,476 - - - -
Financing Sources
Interest Income - - - - - - -
Debt Proceeds - - - - - - -
Other Financing Sources - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Capital Sources
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Gain on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Sources
Interfund Transfers In - - - - - - -
Interfund Loans In - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Provided - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL SOURCES - - 1,476 - - - -
Operating Uses
Wages & Salaries - - - 11,169 11,383 43,908 32,525 286% Employee Benefits - - - 7,779 7,311 20,363 13,052 179%
Utilities & Telephone - - - 1,665 100 1,645 1,545 1545% Materials & Supplies 50 46 - 2,425 1,800 425 (1,375) -76% Contracts & Services 61,038 64,884 55,748 32,196 37,964 3,000 (34,964) -92% Employee Support 3,800 2,203 250 3,760 2,189 3,760 1,571 72% Grants/Contributions to Others - - - - - - -
Other Operating Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal 64,888 67,133 55,998 58,994 60,747 73,101 12,354 20% Capital Uses
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Equipment - - - - - - -
Capital Improvements - - - - - - -
Loss on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Financing Uses
Debt Principal Repaid - - - - - - -
Debt Interest Paid - - - - - - -
Other Financing Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Uses
Interfund Transfers Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Loans Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Used - - - 1,600 1,478 3,305 1,827 124% Subtotal - - - 1,600 1,478 3,305 1,827 124%
Extraordinary Items
Extraordinary Item - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL USES 64,888 67,133 55,998 60,594 62,225 76,406 14,181 23% NET (64,888) (67,133) (54,522) (60,594) (62,225) (76,406) (14,181) 23% * DRAFT * 16
City of Crescent City FY 2022-23 Budget
Fund: 001 General Fund
Dept: 230 Fire
FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Var Var Actual Actual Actual Budget Estimated Proposed $ %
Operating Sources
Taxes - - - - - - -
Special Assessments - - - - - - -
Licenses & Permits - - - - - - -
Fines & Penalties - - - - - - -
Other Operating Sources 37 214 41,363 45,000 51,880 46,800 (5,080) -10% Operating Grants/Contributions 22,918 20,000 33,768 19,086 14,724 - (14,724) -100% Charges for Services 540,967 447,745 328,781 494,153 414,294 710,320 296,026 71% Subtotal 563,922 467,959 403,912 558,239 480,898 757,120 276,222 57% Financing Sources
Interest Income - - - - - - -
Debt Proceeds - - - - - - -
Other Financing Sources - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Capital Sources
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Gain on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Sources
Interfund Transfers In - - 13,816 14,430 12,883 - (12,883) -100% Interfund Loans In - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Provided - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - 13,816 14,430 12,883 - (12,883) -100%
TOTAL SOURCES 563,922 467,959 417,728 572,669 493,781 757,120 263,339 53% Operating Uses
Wages & Salaries 195,867 188,300 163,153 206,788 202,155 372,956 170,801 84% Employee Benefits 284,509 270,455 257,902 448,932 314,291 554,064 239,773 76% Utilities & Telephone 14,812 11,222 12,636 14,045 14,830 15,545 715 5% Materials & Supplies 107,578 106,436 90,079 157,216 138,412 312,600 174,188 126% Contracts & Services 56,360 62,549 76,724 43,215 39,615 40,563 948 2% Employee Support 14,453 7,637 5,932 68,200 34,809 54,155 19,346 56% Grants/Contributions to Others 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 - 0% Other Operating Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal 693,579 666,599 626,426 958,396 764,112 1,369,883 605,771 79% Capital Uses
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Equipment - - - - - - -
Capital Improvements - - - - - - -
Loss on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Financing Uses
Debt Principal Repaid - - - - - - -
Debt Interest Paid - - - - - - -
Other Financing Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Uses
Interfund Transfers Out - - - 138,000 138,000 48,000 (90,000) -65% Interfund Loans Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Used 52,202 74,038 58,453 67,708 72,678 84,442 11,764 16% Subtotal 52,202 74,038 58,453 205,708 210,678 132,442 (78,236) -37% Extraordinary Items
Extraordinary Item - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL USES 745,781 740,637 684,879 1,164,104 974,790 1,502,325 527,535 54% NET (181,859) (272,678) (267,151) (591,435) (481,009) (745,205) (264,196) 55% * DRAFT * 17
City of Crescent City FY 2022-23 Budget
Fund: 001 General Fund
Dept: 240 Police
FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Var Var Actual Actual Actual Budget Estimated Proposed $ %
Operating Sources
Taxes - - - - - - -
Special Assessments - - - - - - -
Licenses & Permits - - - - - - -
Fines & Penalties 2,673 6,632 4,858 4,000 6,351 4,000 (2,351) -37% Other Operating Sources 18,615 87,509 75,688 60,207 74,649 2,500 (72,149) -97% Operating Grants/Contributions 164,213 186,655 206,788 178,058 221,005 279,558 58,553 26% Charges for Services 2,592 4,180 4,318 2,700 3,577 2,700 (877) -25% Subtotal 188,093 284,976 291,652 244,965 305,582 288,758 (16,824) -6% Financing Sources
Interest Income - - - - - - -
Debt Proceeds - - - - - - -
Other Financing Sources - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Capital Sources
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Gain on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Sources
Interfund Transfers In - 5,467 8,066 1,400 - - -
Interfund Loans In - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Provided - - - - - - -
Subtotal - 5,467 8,066 1,400 - - -
TOTAL SOURCES 188,093 290,443 299,718 246,365 305,582 288,758 (16,824) -6% Operating Uses
Wages & Salaries 1,003,573 1,037,717 990,736 1,115,129 1,117,476 1,335,292 217,816 19% Employee Benefits 544,615 602,297 636,826 710,654 678,890 853,956 175,066 26% Utilities & Telephone 17,476 17,887 18,317 20,595 19,496 23,300 3,804 20% Materials & Supplies 96,997 223,088 105,664 163,844 113,933 250,734 136,801 120% Contracts & Services 149,756 176,723 175,570 250,425 246,200 275,450 29,250 12% Employee Support 24,052 36,121 22,747 41,700 34,927 82,600 47,673 136% Grants/Contributions to Others - - - - - - -
Other Operating Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal 1,836,469 2,093,833 1,949,860 2,302,347 2,210,922 2,821,332 610,410 28% Capital Uses
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Equipment - - - - - - -
Capital Improvements - - - - - - -
Loss on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Financing Uses
Debt Principal Repaid - - - - - - -
Debt Interest Paid - - - - - - -
Other Financing Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Uses
Interfund Transfers Out - - 12,255 165,000 165,000 180,000 15,000 9% Interfund Loans Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Used 89,118 129,094 111,576 123,641 120,900 136,343 15,443 13% Subtotal 89,118 129,094 123,831 288,641 285,900 316,343 30,443 11% Extraordinary Items
Extraordinary Item - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL USES 1,925,587 2,222,927 2,073,691 2,590,988 2,496,822 3,137,675 640,853 26% NET (1,737,494) (1,932,484) (1,773,973) (2,344,623) (2,191,240) (2,848,917) (657,677) 30% * DRAFT * 18
City of Crescent City FY 2022-23 Budget
Fund: 001 General Fund
Dept: 250 Code Enforcement
* FY 2014-15 through FY 2018-19, Code Enforcement was included in Dept. 251. Beginning FY 2019-20, Code Enforcement is a separate department.
FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Var Var Actual Actual Actual Budget Estimated Proposed $ %
Operating Sources
Taxes - - - - - - -
Special Assessments - - - - - - -
Licenses & Permits - - - - - - -
Fines & Penalties - - - 1,000 - 1,000 1,000
Other Operating Sources - 450 605 - - 48,000 48,000
Operating Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Charges for Services - - - - - - -
Subtotal - 450 605 1,000 - 49,000 49,000
Financing Sources
Interest Income - - - - - - -
Debt Proceeds - - - - - - -
Other Financing Sources - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Capital Sources
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Gain on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Sources
Interfund Transfers In - - - - - - -
Interfund Loans In - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Provided - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL SOURCES - 450 605 1,000 - 49,000 49,000
Operating Uses
Wages & Salaries - 6,980 8,761 16,299 15,323 27,361 12,038 79% Employee Benefits - 2,993 3,746 7,007 6,307 13,091 6,784 108% Utilities & Telephone - 410 436 538 410 498 88 21%
Materials & Supplies - 16 205 1,362 706 762 56 8%
Contracts & Services - 1,234 552 51,700 41,116 30,000 (11,116) -27% Employee Support - - - 3,400 1,700 3,400 1,700 100%
Grants/Contributions to Others - - - - - - -
Other Operating Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal - 11,633 13,700 80,306 65,562 75,112 9,550 15% Capital Uses
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Equipment - - - - - - -
Capital Improvements - - - - - - -
Loss on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Financing Uses
Debt Principal Repaid - - - - - - -
Debt Interest Paid - - - - - - -
Other Financing Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Uses
Interfund Transfers Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Loans Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Used - 553 634 1,498 1,383 2,081 698 50% Subtotal - 553 634 1,498 1,383 2,081 698 50%
Extraordinary Items
Extraordinary Item - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL USES - 12,186 14,334 81,804 66,945 77,193 10,248 15% NET - (11,736) (13,729) (80,804) (66,945) (28,193) 38,752 -58% * DRAFT * 19
City of Crescent City FY 2022-23 Budget
Fund: 001 General Fund
Dept: 251 Building Inspection
* FY 2014-15 through FY 2018-19, Code Enforcement was included in Dept. 251. Beginning FY 2019-20, Code Enforcement is a separate department.
FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Var Var Actual Actual Actual Budget Estimated Proposed $ %
Operating Sources
Taxes - - - - - - -
Special Assessments - - - - - - -
Licenses & Permits 68,035 83,763 77,994 65,200 59,111 65,200 6,089 10% Fines & Penalties - - - 1,000 - 1,000 1,000
Other Operating Sources 26,951 77 - - - -
Operating Grants/Contributions - - - - - -
Charges for Services 19,376 34,145 27,360 30,000 12,662 20,000 7,338 58% Subtotal 114,362 117,985 105,354 96,200 71,773 86,200 14,427 20% Financing Sources
Interest Income - - - - - - -
Debt Proceeds - - - - - - -
Other Financing Sources - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Capital Sources
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Gain on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Sources
Interfund Transfers In - - - - - - -
Interfund Loans In - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Provided - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL SOURCES 114,362 117,985 105,354 96,200 71,773 86,200 14,427 20% Operating Uses
Wages & Salaries 43,122 26,479 26,827 28,657 26,054 30,727 4,673 18% Employee Benefits 21,001 10,937 9,867 11,103 9,687 11,238 1,551 16% Utilities & Telephone 1,160 738 677 790 690 704 14 2%
Materials & Supplies 362 318 413 2,235 1,153 2,235 1,082 94% Contracts & Services 12,076 3,960 2,051 19,500 8,156 13,000 4,844 59% Employee Support 2,591 4,436 96 9,380 2,475 9,250 6,775 274% Grants/Contributions to Others - - - - - - -
Other Operating Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal 80,312 46,868 39,931 71,665 48,215 67,154 18,939 39% Capital Uses
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Equipment - - - - - - -
Capital Improvements - - - - - - -
Loss on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Financing Uses
Debt Principal Repaid - - - - - - -
Debt Interest Paid - - - - - - -
Other Financing Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Uses
Interfund Transfers Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Loans Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Used 3,218 2,146 1,903 2,073 1,915 2,157 242 13% Subtotal 3,218 2,146 1,903 2,073 1,915 2,157 242 13%
Extraordinary Items
Extraordinary Item - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL USES 83,530 49,014 41,834 73,738 50,130 69,311 19,181 38% NET 30,832 68,971 63,520 22,462 21,643 16,889 (4,754) -22% * DRAFT * 20
City of Crescent City FY 2022-23 Budget
Fund: 001 General Fund
Dept: 313 Planning
FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Var Var Actual Actual Actual Budget Estimated Proposed $ %
Operating Sources
Taxes - - - - - - -
Special Assessments - - - - - - -
Licenses & Permits 600 475 900 450 248 450 202 81%
Fines & Penalties - - - - - - -
Other Operating Sources - - 695 - - - -
Operating Grants/Contributions - - 44,741 229,139 65,836 198,000 132,164 201% Charges for Services 3,573 7,775 16,404 23,000 5,482 14,000 8,518 155% Subtotal 4,173 8,250 62,740 252,589 71,566 212,450 140,884 197% Financing Sources
Interest Income - - - - - - -
Debt Proceeds - - - - - - -
Other Financing Sources - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Capital Sources
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Gain on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Sources
Interfund Transfers In - - - - - - -
Interfund Loans In - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Provided - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL SOURCES 4,173 8,250 62,740 252,589 71,566 212,450 140,884 197% Operating Uses
Wages & Salaries 35,740 16,075 14,411 31,326 30,411 44,166 13,755 45% Employee Benefits 23,281 10,508 9,230 14,774 13,466 22,483 9,017 67% Utilities & Telephone 2,018 583 470 1,918 476 1,318 842 177% Materials & Supplies 433 359 633 2,525 1,462 2,325 863 59% Contracts & Services 14,368 152,632 137,786 296,498 130,306 290,500 160,194 123% Employee Support 2,758 4,436 115 13,500 22 9,000 8,978 40809% Grants/Contributions to Others 39,769 39,844 39,853 40,000 39,853 40,000 147 0% Other Operating Uses 1,275 975 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 - 0% Subtotal 119,642 225,412 203,998 402,041 217,496 411,292 193,796 89% Capital Uses
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Equipment - - - - - - -
Capital Improvements - - - - - - -
Loss on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Financing Uses
Debt Principal Repaid - - - - - - -
Debt Interest Paid - - - - - - -
Other Financing Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Uses
Interfund Transfers Out - 5,000 - - - - -
Interfund Loans Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Used 3,136 1,617 1,473 3,093 2,857 3,427 570 20% Subtotal 3,136 6,617 1,473 3,093 2,857 3,427 570 20%
Extraordinary Items
Extraordinary Item - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL USES 122,778 232,029 205,471 405,134 220,353 414,719 194,366 88% NET (118,605) (223,779) (142,731) (152,545) (148,787) (202,269) (53,482) 36% * DRAFT * 21
City of Crescent City FY 2022-23 Budget
Fund: 001 General Fund
Dept: 350 Public Works - Admin
FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Var Var Actual Actual Actual Budget Estimated Proposed $ %
Operating Sources
Taxes - - - - - - -
Special Assessments - - - - - - -
Licenses & Permits - - - - - - -
Fines & Penalties - - - - - - -
Other Operating Sources 1,808 938 54 1,500 - - -
Operating Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Charges for Services - - - - - - -
Subtotal 1,808 938 54 1,500 - - -
Financing Sources
Interest Income - - - - - - -
Debt Proceeds - - - - - - -
Other Financing Sources - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Capital Sources
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Gain on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Sources
Interfund Transfers In - - - - - - -
Interfund Loans In - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Provided - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL SOURCES 1,808 938 54 1,500 - - -
Operating Uses
Wages & Salaries 75,941 43,094 33,332 45,059 41,905 57,743 15,838 38% Employee Benefits 50,414 27,270 22,678 29,260 26,267 33,030 6,763 26% Utilities & Telephone 9,631 4,397 4,085 5,750 4,530 4,450 (80) -2% Materials & Supplies 8,408 5,068 4,210 6,350 6,292 7,552 1,260 20% Contracts & Services 5,954 4,867 5,540 8,002 6,071 7,502 1,431 24% Employee Support 2,956 843 2,129 4,005 4,795 4,005 (790) -16% Grants/Contributions to Others - - - - - - -
Other Operating Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal 153,304 85,539 71,974 98,426 89,860 114,282 24,422 27% Capital Uses
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Equipment - - - - - - -
Capital Improvements - - - - - - -
Loss on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Financing Uses
Debt Principal Repaid - - - - - - -
Debt Interest Paid - - - - - - -
Other Financing Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Uses
Interfund Transfers Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Loans Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Used 6,411 4,411 3,743 4,859 4,488 4,668 180 4% Subtotal 6,411 4,411 3,743 4,859 4,488 4,668 180 4%
Extraordinary Items
Extraordinary Item - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL USES 159,715 89,950 75,717 103,285 94,348 118,950 24,602 26% NET (157,907) (89,012) (75,663) (101,785) (94,348) (118,950) (24,602) 26% * DRAFT * 22
City of Crescent City FY 2022-23 Budget
Fund: 001 General Fund
Dept: 364 Public Works - Streets
FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Var Var Actual Actual Actual Budget Estimated Proposed $ %
Operating Sources
Taxes - - - - - - -
Special Assessments - - - - - - -
Licenses & Permits - - - - - - -
Fines & Penalties - - - - - - -
Other Operating Sources - 8,561 4,466 7,000 13,609 24,000 10,391 76% Operating Grants/Contributions 225,382 - 48,981 45,800 48,642 7,800 (40,842) -84% Charges for Services 8,176 7,693 2,110 5,000 2,099 5,000 2,901 138% Subtotal 233,558 16,254 55,557 57,800 64,350 36,800 (27,550) -43% Financing Sources
Interest Income - - - - - - -
Debt Proceeds - - - - - - -
Other Financing Sources - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Capital Sources
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Gain on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Sources
Interfund Transfers In 138,053 165,028 805,048 277,342 255,608 230,678 (24,930) -10% Interfund Loans In - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Provided - - - - - - -
Subtotal 138,053 165,028 805,048 277,342 255,608 230,678 (24,930) -10% TOTAL SOURCES 371,611 181,282 860,605 335,142 319,958 267,478 (52,480) -16% Operating Uses
Wages & Salaries 120,052 138,581 156,821 150,802 146,680 171,190 24,510 17% Employee Benefits 72,711 86,775 100,084 96,589 92,894 103,017 10,123 11% Utilities & Telephone 76,905 67,928 58,758 82,600 65,772 75,440 9,668 15% Materials & Supplies 63,017 87,922 38,595 165,933 71,096 113,200 42,104 59% Contracts & Services 39,036 43,040 55,174 340,363 337,670 419,285 81,615 24% Employee Support - - - 5,500 3,779 4,000 221 6%
Grants/Contributions to Others - - - - - - -
Other Operating Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal 371,721 424,246 409,432 841,787 717,891 886,132 168,241 23% Capital Uses
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Equipment - - - - - - -
Capital Improvements - - - - - - -
Loss on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Financing Uses
Debt Principal Repaid - - - - - - -
Debt Interest Paid - - - - - - -
Other Financing Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Uses
Interfund Transfers Out - 651,738 - 778,673 778,626 1,050,734 272,108 35% Interfund Loans Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Used 57,347 63,408 68,122 71,911 64,304 66,998 2,694 4% Subtotal 57,347 715,146 68,122 850,584 842,930 1,117,732 274,802 33% Extraordinary Items
Extraordinary Item - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL USES 429,068 1,139,392 477,554 1,692,371 1,560,821 2,003,864 443,043 28% NET (57,457) (958,110) 383,051 (1,357,229) (1,240,863) (1,736,386) (495,523) 40% * DRAFT * 23
City of Crescent City FY 2022-23 Budget
Fund: 001 General Fund
Dept: 470 Public Works - Parks
FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Var Var Actual Actual Actual Budget Estimated Proposed $ %
Operating Sources
Taxes - - - - - - -
Special Assessments - - - - - - -
Licenses & Permits - - - - - - -
Fines & Penalties - - - - - - -
Other Operating Sources - 51 - 3,000 12,219 3,000 (9,219) -75% Operating Grants/Contributions - 29,115 82,512 - 24,396 - (24,396) -100% Charges for Services 1,649 1,160 64 1,000 359 1,000 641 179% Subtotal 1,649 30,326 82,576 4,000 36,974 4,000 (32,974) -89% Financing Sources
Interest Income - - - - - - -
Debt Proceeds - - - - - - -
Other Financing Sources - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Capital Sources
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Gain on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Sources
Interfund Transfers In - 5,000 - 12,000 11,895 - (11,895) -100% Interfund Loans In - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Provided - - - - - - -
Subtotal - 5,000 - 12,000 11,895 - (11,895) -100%
TOTAL SOURCES 1,649 35,326 82,576 16,000 48,869 4,000 (44,869) -92% Operating Uses
Wages & Salaries 110,103 131,542 101,075 139,341 114,472 190,055 75,583 66% Employee Benefits 67,941 80,440 50,548 60,397 58,771 85,217 26,446 45% Utilities & Telephone 14,904 13,666 28,905 32,012 29,370 31,030 1,660 6% Materials & Supplies 53,218 46,144 21,617 66,600 48,266 42,470 (5,796) -12% Contracts & Services 21,299 56,284 101,191 52,068 47,955 38,226 (9,729) -20% Employee Support - 404 50 800 402 1,800 1,398 348%
Grants/Contributions to Others - - - - - - -
Other Operating Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal 267,465 328,480 303,386 351,218 299,236 388,798 89,562 30% Capital Uses
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Equipment - - - - - - -
Capital Improvements - - - - - - -
Loss on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Financing Uses
Debt Principal Repaid - - - - - - -
Debt Interest Paid - - - - - - -
Other Financing Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Uses
Interfund Transfers Out 2,958 - - 39,350 39,350 7,400 (31,950) -81% Interfund Loans Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Used 46,242 52,095 52,161 56,027 50,046 54,312 4,266 9% Subtotal 49,200 52,095 52,161 95,377 89,396 61,712 (27,684) -31% Extraordinary Items
Extraordinary Item - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL USES 316,665 380,575 355,547 446,595 388,632 450,510 61,878 16% NET (315,016) (345,249) (272,971) (430,595) (339,763) (446,510) (106,747) 31% * DRAFT * 24
City of Crescent City FY 2022-23 Budget
Fund: 001 General Fund
Dept: 471 Cultural Center
FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Var Var Actual Actual Actual Budget Estimated Proposed $ %
Operating Sources
Taxes - - - - - - -
Special Assessments - - - - - - -
Licenses & Permits - - - - - - -
Fines & Penalties - - - - - - -
Other Operating Sources - 36 - - - - -
Operating Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Charges for Services 12,068 10,896 6,492 10,000 8,725 16,400 7,675 88% Subtotal 12,068 10,932 6,492 10,000 8,725 16,400 7,675 88% Financing Sources
Interest Income - - - - - - -
Debt Proceeds - - - - - - -
Other Financing Sources - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Capital Sources
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Gain on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Sources
Interfund Transfers In - - - - - 8,500 8,500
Interfund Loans In - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Provided - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - 8,500 8,500
TOTAL SOURCES 12,068 10,932 6,492 10,000 8,725 24,900 16,175 185% Operating Uses
Wages & Salaries 6,070 26,345 27,779 27,584 22,445 35,312 12,867 57% Employee Benefits 2,768 16,860 17,622 15,653 14,488 15,876 1,388 10% Utilities & Telephone 26,889 28,350 19,970 28,750 22,765 33,334 10,569 46% Materials & Supplies 7,749 27,248 589 10,000 3,254 17,250 13,996 430% Contracts & Services 7,162 93,045 5,031 70,825 60,767 10,720 (50,047) -82% Employee Support - - - - - - -
Grants/Contributions to Others - - - - - - -
Other Operating Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal 50,638 191,848 70,991 152,812 123,719 112,492 (11,227) -9% Capital Uses
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Equipment - - - - - - -
Capital Improvements - - - - - - -
Loss on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Financing Uses
Debt Principal Repaid - - - - - - -
Debt Interest Paid - - - - - - -
Other Financing Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Uses
Interfund Transfers Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Loans Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Used 421 2,759 2,274 3,057 2,825 2,633 (192) -7% Subtotal 421 2,759 2,274 3,057 2,825 2,633 (192) -7%
Extraordinary Items
Extraordinary Item - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL USES 51,059 194,607 73,265 155,869 126,544 115,125 (11,419) -9% NET (38,991) (183,675) (66,773) (145,869) (117,819) (90,225) 27,594 -23% * DRAFT * 25
City of Crescent City FY 2022-23 Budget
Fund: 001 General Fund
Dept: 480 Fred Endert Municipal Swimming Pool
FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Var Var Actual Actual Actual Budget Estimated Proposed $ %
Operating Sources
Taxes - - - - - - -
Special Assessments - - - - - - -
Licenses & Permits - - - - - - -
Fines & Penalties - - - - - - -
Other Operating Sources 7,736 32,137 376 3,830 4,032 7,330 3,298 82% Operating Grants/Contributions 17,200 25 16,205 10,000 6 - (6) -100% Charges for Services 186,602 136,392 18,048 166,146 155,760 198,075 42,315 27% Subtotal 211,538 168,554 34,629 179,976 159,798 205,405 45,607 29% Financing Sources
Interest Income - - - - - - -
Debt Proceeds - - - - - - -
Other Financing Sources - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Capital Sources
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Gain on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Sources
Interfund Transfers In - - - - - - -
Interfund Loans In - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Provided - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL SOURCES 211,538 168,554 34,629 179,976 159,798 205,405 45,607 29% Operating Uses
Wages & Salaries 275,216 225,519 103,686 354,006 337,705 384,448 46,743 14% Employee Benefits 94,935 88,165 77,043 112,417 96,296 145,538 49,242 51% Utilities & Telephone 136,003 84,723 50,084 139,680 118,720 134,439 15,719 13% Materials & Supplies 70,690 29,928 25,737 80,545 60,823 72,185 11,362 19% Contracts & Services 73,061 18,586 6,622 129,023 79,658 77,069 (2,589) -3% Employee Support 5,208 1,806 2,247 3,505 3,428 5,400 1,972 58% Grants/Contributions to Others - - - - - - -
Other Operating Uses 6,331 4,382 594 7,092 4,531 9,092 4,561 101% Subtotal 661,444 453,109 266,013 826,268 701,161 828,171 127,010 18% Capital Uses
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Equipment - - - - - - -
Capital Improvements - - - - - - -
Loss on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Financing Uses
Debt Principal Repaid - - - - - - -
Debt Interest Paid - - - - - - -
Other Financing Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Uses
Interfund Transfers Out - - - 516,223 516,223 130,000 (386,223) -75% Interfund Loans Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Used 17,348 19,587 4,195 22,734 21,004 27,250 6,246 30% Subtotal 17,348 19,587 4,195 538,957 537,227 157,250 (379,977) -71% Extraordinary Items
Extraordinary Item - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL USES 678,792 472,696 270,208 1,365,225 1,238,388 985,421 (252,967) -20% NET (467,254) (304,142) (235,579) (1,185,249) (1,078,590) (780,016) 298,574 -28% * DRAFT * 26
Special Revenue Funds
* DRAFT * 27
City of Crescent City FY 2022-23 Budget
Fund: 104 CDBG Program Income
Dept: 485 CDBG
FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Var Var Actual Actual Actual Budget Estimated Proposed $ %
Operating Sources
Taxes - - - - - - -
Special Assessments - - - - - - -
Licenses & Permits - - - - - - -
Fines & Penalties - - - - - - -
Other Operating Sources - - - - - - -
Operating Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Charges for Services - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Financing Sources
Interest Income 4 1 - - - - -
Debt Proceeds - - - - - - -
Other Financing Sources - - - - - - -
Subtotal 4 1 - - - - -
Capital Sources
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Gain on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Sources
Interfund Transfers In 34,053 14,216 1,570 7,800 1,500 1,500 - 0% Interfund Loans In - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Provided - - - - - - -
Subtotal 34,053 14,216 1,570 7,800 1,500 1,500 - 0%
TOTAL SOURCES 34,057 14,217 1,570 7,800 1,500 1,500 - 0% Operating Uses
Wages & Salaries - - - - - - -
Employee Benefits - - - - - - -
Utilities & Telephone - - - - - - -
Materials & Supplies - - - - - - -
Contracts & Services - - - - - - -
Employee Support - - - - - - -
Grants/Contributions to Others - - - - - - -
Other Operating Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Capital Uses
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Equipment - - - - - - -
Capital Improvements - - - - - - -
Loss on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Financing Uses
Debt Principal Repaid - - - - - - -
Debt Interest Paid - - - - - - -
Other Financing Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Uses
Interfund Transfers Out 6,125 34,059 14,218 7,800 1,569 1,500 (69) -4% Interfund Loans Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Used - - - - - - -
Subtotal 6,125 34,059 14,218 7,800 1,569 1,500 (69) -4% Extraordinary Items
Extraordinary Item - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL USES 6,125 34,059 14,218 7,800 1,569 1,500 (69) -4% NET 27,932 (19,842) (12,648) - (69) - 69 -100%
FUND BALANCE 34,059 14,217 1,569 1,569 1,500 1,500 - 0% * DRAFT * 28
City of Crescent City FY 2022-23 Budget
Fund: 106 Rehab & Sidewalk Loan Fund
Dept: n/a Rehab & Sidewalk Loan Fund - All Cost Centers Combined FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Var Var Actual Actual Actual Budget Estimated Proposed $ %
Operating Sources
Taxes - - - - - - -
Special Assessments - - - - - - -
Licenses & Permits - - - - - - -
Fines & Penalties - - - - - - -
Other Operating Sources - - - - - - -
Operating Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Charges for Services - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Financing Sources
Interest Income 452 443 (3) 100 - - -
Debt Proceeds - - - - - - -
Other Financing Sources - - - - - - -
Subtotal 452 443 (3) 100 - - -
Capital Sources
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Gain on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Sources
Interfund Transfers In - - - - - - -
Interfund Loans In - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Provided - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL SOURCES 452 443 (3) 100 - - -
Operating Uses
Wages & Salaries - - - - - - -
Employee Benefits - - - - - - -
Utilities & Telephone - - - - - - -
Materials & Supplies - - - - - - -
Contracts & Services - - - - - - -
Employee Support - - - - - - -
Grants/Contributions to Others - - - - - - -
Other Operating Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Capital Uses
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Equipment - - - - - - -
Capital Improvements - - - - - - -
Loss on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Financing Uses
Debt Principal Repaid - - - - - - -
Debt Interest Paid - - - - - - -
Other Financing Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal -
Internal Uses
Interfund Transfers Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Loans Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Used - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Extraordinary Items
Extraordinary Item - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL USES - - - - - - -
NET 452 443 (3) 100 - - -
FUND BALANCE 89,432 89,875 89,871 89,971 89,871 89,871 - 0% * DRAFT * 29
City of Crescent City FY 2022-23 Budget
Fund: 107 CDBG Loan Fund
Dept: 485 CDBG
FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Var Var Actual Actual Actual Budget Estimated Proposed $ %
Operating Sources
Taxes - - - - - - -
Special Assessments - - - - - - -
Licenses & Permits - - - - - - -
Fines & Penalties - - - - - - -
Other Operating Sources 44,833 - - - - - -
Operating Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Charges for Services - - - - - - -
Subtotal 44,833 - - - - - -
Financing Sources
Interest Income 163 28 1 - - - -
Debt Proceeds - - - - - - -
Other Financing Sources - - - - - - -
Subtotal 163 28 1 - - - -
Capital Sources
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Gain on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Sources
Interfund Transfers In - - - - - - -
Interfund Loans In - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Provided - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL SOURCES 44,996 28 1 - - - -
Operating Uses
Wages & Salaries - - - - - - -
Employee Benefits - - - - - - -
Utilities & Telephone - - - - - - -
Materials & Supplies - - - - - - -
Contracts & Services - - - - - - -
Employee Support - - - - - - -
Grants/Contributions to Others - - - - - - -
Other Operating Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Capital Uses
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Equipment - - - - - - -
Capital Improvements - - - - - - -
Loss on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Financing Uses
Debt Principal Repaid - - - - - - -
Debt Interest Paid - - - - - - -
Other Financing Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal -
Internal Uses
Interfund Transfers Out 34,053 14,216 1,445 7,800 1,500 1,500 - 0% Interfund Loans Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Used - - - - - - -
Subtotal 34,053 14,216 1,445 7,800 1,500 1,500 - 0%
Extraordinary Items
Extraordinary Item - - - - - - -
- - - - - - -
TOTAL USES 34,053 14,216 1,445 7,800 1,500 1,500 - 0%
NET 10,943 (14,188) (1,444) (7,800) (1,500) (1,500) - 0% FUND BALANCE 56,219 42,031 40,588 32,788 39,088 37,588 (1,500) -4% * DRAFT * 30
City of Crescent City FY 2022-23 Budget
Fund: 150 14-CDBG-9880 Fund
Dept: 485 CDBG
* Grant closed in FY18
FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Var Var Actual Actual Actual Budget Estimated Proposed $ %
Operating Sources
Taxes - - - - - - -
Special Assessments - - - - - - -
Licenses & Permits - - - - - - -
Fines & Penalties - - - - - - -
Other Operating Sources - - - - - - -
Operating Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Charges for Services - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Financing Sources
Interest Income - - - - - - -
Debt Proceeds - - - - - - -
Other Financing Sources - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Capital Sources
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Gain on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Sources
Interfund Transfers In - - - - - - -
Interfund Loans In - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Provided - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL SOURCES - - - - - - -
Operating Uses
Wages & Salaries - - - - - - -
Employee Benefits - - - - - - -
Utilities & Telephone - - - - - - -
Materials & Supplies - - - - - - -
Contracts & Services - - - - - - -
Employee Support - - - - - - -
Grants/Contributions to Others - - - - - - -
Other Operating Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Capital Uses
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Equipment - - - - - - -
Capital Improvements - - - - - - -
Loss on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Financing Uses
Debt Principal Repaid - - - - - - -
Debt Interest Paid - - - - - - -
Other Financing Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal -
Internal Uses
Interfund Transfers Out - - 15 - - - -
Interfund Loans Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Used - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - 15 - - - -
Extraordinary Items
Extraordinary Item - - - - - - -
- - - - - - -
TOTAL USES - - 15 - - - -
NET - - (15) - - - -
FUND BALANCE 14 15 - - - - -
* DRAFT * 31
City of Crescent City FY 2022-23 Budget
Fund: 151 16-CDBG-11136 Fund
Dept: 485 CDBG
* Grant closed in FY20
FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Var Var Actual Actual Actual Budget Estimated Proposed $ %
Operating Sources
Taxes - - - - - - -
Special Assessments - - - - - - -
Licenses & Permits - - - - - - -
Fines & Penalties - - - - - - -
Other Operating Sources - - - - - - -
Operating Grants/Contributions 151,679 319,880 - - - - - Charges for Services - - - - - - -
Subtotal 151,679 319,880 - - - - -
Financing Sources
Interest Income - - - - - - -
Debt Proceeds - - - - - - -
Other Financing Sources - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Capital Sources
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Gain on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Sources
Interfund Transfers In - - 1 - - - -
Interfund Loans In - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Provided - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - 1 - - - -
TOTAL SOURCES 151,679 319,880 1 - - - -
Operating Uses
Wages & Salaries 8,777 - - - - - -
Employee Benefits 3,071 - - - - - -
Utilities & Telephone - - - - - - -
Materials & Supplies 249 - - - - - -
Contracts & Services 8,924 51,162 - - - - -
Employee Support - - - - - - -
Grants/Contributions to Others 273,056 85,798 - - - - - Other Operating Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal 294,077 136,960 - - - - -
Capital Uses
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Equipment - - - - - - -
Capital Improvements - - - - - - -
Loss on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Financing Uses
Debt Principal Repaid - - - - - - -
Debt Interest Paid - - - - - - -
Other Financing Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal -
Internal Uses
Interfund Transfers Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Loans Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Used - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Extraordinary Items
Extraordinary Item - - - - - - -
- - - - - - -
TOTAL USES 294,077 136,960 - - - - -
NET (142,398) 182,920 1 - - - -
FUND BALANCE (182,921) (1) - - - - -
* DRAFT * 32
City of Crescent City FY 2022-23 Budget
Fund: 152 17-CDBG-12092 Fund
Dept: 485 CDBG
* Grant closed in FY22
FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Var Var Actual Actual Actual Budget Estimated Proposed $ %
Operating Sources
Taxes - - - - - - -
Special Assessments - - - - - - -
Licenses & Permits - - - - - - -
Fines & Penalties - - - - - - -
Other Operating Sources - - - - - - -
Operating Grants/Contributions - 717,093 3,958,027 280,534 909,163 - (909,163) -100% Charges for Services - - - - - - -
Subtotal - 717,093 3,958,027 280,534 909,163 - (909,163) -100% Financing Sources
Interest Income - - - - - - -
Debt Proceeds - - - - - - -
Other Financing Sources - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Capital Sources
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Gain on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Sources
Interfund Transfers In - 5,000 - - 159 - (159) -100%
Interfund Loans In - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Provided - - - - - - -
Subtotal - 5,000 - - 159 - (159) -100%
TOTAL SOURCES - 722,093 3,958,027 280,534 909,322 - (909,322) -100% Operating Uses
Wages & Salaries 11,496 70,936 9,306 6,152 268 - (268) -100% Employee Benefits 3,962 19,780 3,285 1,625 124 - (124) -100% Utilities & Telephone - 364 - - - - -
Materials & Supplies 125 62,970 - - - - -
Contracts & Services 25,316 123,156 129,690 2,483 1,808 - (1,808) -100% Employee Support 1,998 916 - 350 349 - (349) -100%
Grants/Contributions to Others 26,579 48,929 55,768 8,725 - - - Other Operating Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal 69,476 327,051 198,049 19,335 2,549 - (2,549) -100% Capital Uses
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Equipment - - - - - - -
Capital Improvements - 747,623 4,235,905 78,336 8,101 - (8,101) -100% Loss on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - 747,623 4,235,905 78,336 8,101 - (8,101) -100% Financing Uses
Debt Principal Repaid - - - - - - -
Debt Interest Paid - - 689 - - - -
Other Financing Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - 689 - - - -
Internal Uses
Interfund Transfers Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Loans Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Used - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Extraordinary Items
Extraordinary Item - - - - - - -
- - - - - - -
TOTAL USES 69,476 1,074,674 4,434,643 97,671 10,650 - (10,650) -100% NET (69,476) (352,581) (476,616) 182,863 898,672 - (898,672) -100% FUND BALANCE (69,476) (422,057) (898,672) (715,809) - - - * DRAFT * 33
City of Crescent City FY 2022-23 Budget
Fund: 153 2020 CDBG Fund
Dept: 485 CDBG
FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Var Var Actual Actual Actual Budget Estimated Proposed $ %
Operating Sources
Taxes - - - - - - -
Special Assessments - - - - - - -
Licenses & Permits - - - - - - -
Fines & Penalties - - - - - - -
Other Operating Sources - - - - - - -
Operating Grants/Contributions - - - 1,400,500 312,638 1,087,862 775,224 248% Charges for Services - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - 1,400,500 312,638 1,087,862 775,224 248% Financing Sources
Interest Income - - - - - - -
Debt Proceeds - - - - - - -
Other Financing Sources - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Capital Sources
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Gain on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Sources
Interfund Transfers In - - - - - - -
Interfund Loans In - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Provided - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL SOURCES - - - 1,400,500 312,638 1,087,862 775,224 248% Operating Uses
Wages & Salaries - - 12,843 19,077 6,805 12,275 5,470 80% Employee Benefits - - 4,766 8,795 2,539 6,256 3,717 146% Utilities & Telephone - - - - - - -
Materials & Supplies - - - 730 - 730 730
Contracts & Services - - 26,246 24,189 7,480 16,709 9,229 123% Employee Support - - - 1,350 - 1,350 1,350
Grants/Contributions to Others - - 16,092 1,286,409 235,867 1,050,542 814,675 345% Other Operating Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - 59,947 1,340,550 252,691 1,087,862 835,171 331% Capital Uses
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Equipment - - - - - - -
Capital Improvements - - - - - - -
Loss on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Financing Uses
Debt Principal Repaid - - - - - - -
Debt Interest Paid - - - - - - -
Other Financing Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal -
Internal Uses
Interfund Transfers Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Loans Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Used - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Extraordinary Items
Extraordinary Item - - - - - - -
- - - - - - -
TOTAL USES - - 59,947 1,340,550 252,691 1,087,862 835,171 331% NET - - (59,947) 59,950 59,947 - (59,947) -100%
FUND BALANCE - - (59,947) 3 - - -
* DRAFT * 34
City of Crescent City FY 2022-23 Budget
Fund: 154 CDBG COVID Grant Fund
Dept: 485 CDBG
FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Var Var Actual Actual Actual Budget Estimated Proposed $ %
Operating Sources
Taxes - - - - - - -
Special Assessments - - - - - - -
Licenses & Permits - - - - - - -
Fines & Penalties - - - - - - -
Other Operating Sources - - - - - - -
Operating Grants/Contributions - - - 432,766 96,620 336,146 239,526 248% Charges for Services - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - 432,766 96,620 336,146 239,526 248%
Financing Sources
Interest Income - - - - - - -
Debt Proceeds - - - - - - -
Other Financing Sources - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Capital Sources
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Gain on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Sources
Interfund Transfers In - - - - - - -
Interfund Loans In - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Provided - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL SOURCES - - - 432,766 96,620 336,146 239,526 248% Operating Uses
Wages & Salaries - - 3,557 27,894 4,395 23,499 19,104 435% Employee Benefits - - 1,410 13,749 1,774 11,975 10,201 575% Utilities & Telephone - - - - - - -
Materials & Supplies - - - 300 - 300 300
Contracts & Services - - 2,770 24,071 472 23,599 23,127 4900% Employee Support - - - 650 - 650 650
Grants/Contributions to Others - - 2,658 355,707 79,584 276,123 196,539 247% Other Operating Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - 10,395 422,371 86,225 336,146 249,921 290% Capital Uses
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Equipment - - - - - - -
Capital Improvements - - - - - - -
Loss on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Financing Uses
Debt Principal Repaid - - - - - - -
Debt Interest Paid - - - - - - -
Other Financing Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal -
Internal Uses
Interfund Transfers Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Loans Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Used - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Extraordinary Items
Extraordinary Item - - - - - - -
- - - - - - -
TOTAL USES - - 10,395 422,371 86,225 336,146 249,921 290% NET - - (10,395) 10,395 10,395 - (10,395) -100%
FUND BALANCE - - (10,395) - - - -
* DRAFT * 35
City of Crescent City FY 2022-23 Budget
Fund: 110 Housing Authority
Dept: n/a Housing Authority - All Cost Centers Combined FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Var Var Actual Actual Actual Budget Estimated Proposed $ %
Operating Sources
Taxes - - - - - - -
Special Assessments - - - - - - -
Licenses & Permits - - - - - - -
Fines & Penalties - - - - - - -
Other Operating Sources 26,379 43,111 42,710 27,000 27,000 36,000 9,000 33% Operating Grants/Contributions 3,469,488 3,835,595 3,771,794 4,041,489 4,041,489 4,338,531 297,042 7% Charges for Services 197 838 104 - - - -
Subtotal 3,496,064 3,879,544 3,814,608 4,068,489 4,068,489 4,374,531 306,042 8% Financing Sources
Interest Income 1,330 1,224 1,246 140 140 140 - 0%
Debt Proceeds - - - - - - -
Other Financing Sources - - - - - - -
Subtotal 1,330 1,224 1,246 140 140 140 - 0%
Capital Sources
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Gain on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Sources
Interfund Transfers In - - 42 - - - -
Interfund Loans In - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Provided - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - 42 - - - -
TOTAL SOURCES 3,497,394 3,880,768 3,815,896 4,068,629 4,068,629 4,374,671 306,042 8% Operating Uses
Wages & Salaries 219,158 246,305 266,830 291,026 291,026 296,701 5,675 2% Employee Benefits 133,634 152,208 157,320 169,228 169,228 176,466 7,238 4% Utilities & Telephone 7,447 7,889 10,132 9,612 9,612 9,312 (300) -3% Materials & Supplies 17,662 22,942 23,495 82,617 82,617 47,068 (35,549) -43% Contracts & Services 19,441 29,059 30,284 77,725 77,725 72,157 (5,568) -7% Employee Support 4,696 5,694 2,723 5,720 5,720 7,420 1,700 30% Grants/Contributions to Others 3,110,354 3,200,440 3,197,165 3,433,715 3,433,715 3,723,598 289,883 8% Other Operating Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal 3,512,392 3,664,537 3,687,949 4,069,643 4,069,643 4,332,722 263,079 6% Capital Uses
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Equipment - - - - - - -
Capital Improvements - - - - - - -
Loss on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Financing Uses
Debt Principal Repaid - - - - - - -
Debt Interest Paid - - - - - - -
Other Financing Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal -
Internal Uses
Interfund Transfers Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Loans Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Used 10,964 18,657 18,391 21,526 21,526 24,570 3,044 14% Subtotal 10,964 18,657 18,391 21,526 21,526 24,570 3,044 14% Extraordinary Items
Extraordinary Item - - - - - - -
- - - - - - -
TOTAL USES 3,523,356 3,683,194 3,706,340 4,091,169 4,091,169 4,357,292 266,123 7% NET (25,962) 197,574 109,556 (22,540) (22,540) 17,379 39,919 -177% FUND BALANCE 132,716 330,291 439,848 417,308 417,308 434,687 17,379 4% * DRAFT * 36
City of Crescent City FY 2022-23 Budget
Fund: 115 Gas Tax Fund (HUTA)
Dept: 364 Streets
FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Var Var Actual Actual Actual Budget Estimated Proposed $ %
Operating Sources
Taxes - - - - - - -
Special Assessments - - - - - - -
Licenses & Permits - - - - - - -
Fines & Penalties - - - - - - -
Other Operating Sources - - - - - - -
Operating Grants/Contributions 155,044 173,474 166,678 198,337 198,337 220,513 22,176 11% Charges for Services - - - - - - -
Subtotal 155,044 173,474 166,678 198,337 198,337 220,513 22,176 11% Financing Sources
Interest Income 458 624 94 - - - -
Debt Proceeds - - - - - - -
Other Financing Sources - - - - - - -
Subtotal 458 624 94 - - - -
Capital Sources
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Gain on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Sources
Interfund Transfers In - - - - - - -
Interfund Loans In - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Provided - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL SOURCES 155,502 174,098 166,772 198,337 198,337 220,513 22,176 11% Operating Uses
Wages & Salaries - - - - - - -
Employee Benefits - - - - - - -
Utilities & Telephone - - - - - - -
Materials & Supplies - - - - - - -
Contracts & Services - - - - - - -
Employee Support - - - - - - -
Grants/Contributions to Others 17,449 16,565 13,369 18,158 18,158 19,835 1,677 9% Other Operating Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal 17,449 16,565 13,369 18,158 18,158 19,835 1,677 9% Capital Uses
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Equipment - - - - - - -
Capital Improvements - - - - - - -
Loss on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Financing Uses
Debt Principal Repaid - - - - - - -
Debt Interest Paid - - - - - - -
Other Financing Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Uses
Interfund Transfers Out 138,053 157,528 153,310 180,179 180,179 200,678 20,499 11% Interfund Loans Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Used - - - - - - -
Subtotal 138,053 157,528 153,310 180,179 180,179 200,678 20,499 11% Extraordinary Items
Extraordinary Item - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL USES 155,502 174,093 166,679 198,337 198,337 220,513 22,176 11% NET - 5 93 - - - -
FUND BALANCE 17,366 17,372 17,465 17,465 17,465 17,465 - 0% * DRAFT * 37
City of Crescent City FY 2022-23 Budget
Fund: 116 Successor Housing
Dept: n/a Successor Housing - All Cost Centers Combined FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Var Var Actual Actual Actual Budget Estimated Proposed $ %
Operating Sources
Taxes - - - - - - -
Special Assessments - - - - - - -
Licenses & Permits - - - - - - -
Fines & Penalties - - - - - - -
Other Operating Sources - - - - - - -
Operating Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Charges for Services - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Financing Sources
Interest Income 4,434 5,784 (13) - - - -
Debt Proceeds - - - - - - -
Other Financing Sources - - - - - - -
Subtotal 4,434 5,784 (13) - - - -
Capital Sources
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Gain on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Sources
Interfund Transfers In - - - - - - -
Interfund Loans In - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Provided - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL SOURCES 4,434 5,784 (13) - - - -
Operating Uses
Wages & Salaries - - - - - - -
Employee Benefits - - - - - - -
Utilities & Telephone - - - - - - -
Materials & Supplies - - - - - - -
Contracts & Services - - - - - - -
Employee Support - - - - - - -
Grants/Contributions to Others - - - - - - -
Other Operating Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Capital Uses
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Equipment - - - - - - -
Capital Improvements - - - - - - -
Loss on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Financing Uses
Debt Principal Repaid - - - - - - -
Debt Interest Paid - - - - - - -
Other Financing Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal -
Internal Uses
Interfund Transfers Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Loans Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Used - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Extraordinary Items
Extraordinary Item - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL USES - - - - - - -
NET 4,434 5,784 (13) - - - -
FUND BALANCE 401,624 407,407 407,394 407,394 407,394 407,394 - 0% * DRAFT * 38
City of Crescent City FY 2022-23 Budget
Fund: 117 Gas Tax (Road Maintenance & Rehabilitation Account) Dept: 364 Streets
FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Var Var Actual Actual Actual Budget Estimated Proposed $ %
Operating Sources
Taxes - - - - - - -
Special Assessments - - - - - - -
Licenses & Permits - - - - - - -
Fines & Penalties - - - - - - -
Other Operating Sources - - - - - - -
Operating Grants/Contributions 140,159 132,376 141,690 158,306 158,306 174,220 15,914 10% Charges for Services - - - - - - -
Subtotal 140,159 132,376 141,690 158,306 158,306 174,220 15,914 10% Financing Sources
Interest Income 808 237 375 - - - -
Debt Proceeds - - - - - - -
Other Financing Sources - - - - - - -
Subtotal 808 237 375 - - - -
Capital Sources
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Gain on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Sources
Interfund Transfers In - - - - - - -
Interfund Loans In - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Provided - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL SOURCES 140,967 132,613 142,065 158,306 158,306 174,220 15,914 10% Operating Uses
Wages & Salaries - - - - - - -
Employee Benefits - - - - - - -
Utilities & Telephone - - - - - - -
Materials & Supplies - - - - - - -
Contracts & Services 92,188 89,495 6,370 250,314 250,314 170,000 (80,314) -32% Employee Support - - - - - - -
Grants/Contributions to Others 23,671 22,676 20,650 26,912 26,912 29,617 2,705 10% Other Operating Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal 115,859 112,171 27,020 277,226 277,226 199,617 (77,609) -28% Capital Uses
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Equipment - - - - - - -
Capital Improvements - - - - - - -
Loss on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Financing Uses
Debt Principal Repaid - - - - - - -
Debt Interest Paid - - - - - - -
Other Financing Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal -
Internal Uses
Interfund Transfers Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Loans Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Used - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Extraordinary Items
Extraordinary Item - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL USES 115,859 112,171 27,020 277,226 277,226 199,617 (77,609) -28% NET 25,108 20,442 115,045 (118,920) (118,920) (25,397) 93,523 -79% FUND BALANCE 25,108 45,551 160,594 41,674 41,674 16,277 (25,397) -61% * DRAFT * 39
City of Crescent City FY 2022-23 Budget
Fund: 119 CARES Act Fund
Dept: n/a CARES Act Fund - All Cost Centers Combined
FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Var Var Actual Actual Actual Budget Estimated Proposed $ %
Operating Sources
Taxes - - - - - - -
Special Assessments - - - - - - -
Licenses & Permits - - - - - - -
Fines & Penalties - - - - - - -
Other Operating Sources - - - - - - -
Operating Grants/Contributions - - 82,392 - - - -
Charges for Services - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - 82,392 - - - -
Financing Sources
Interest Income - - - - - - -
Debt Proceeds - - - - - - -
Other Financing Sources - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Capital Sources
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Gain on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Sources
Interfund Transfers In - - - - - - -
Interfund Loans In - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Provided - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL SOURCES - - 82,392 - - - -
Operating Uses
Wages & Salaries - - - - - - -
Employee Benefits - - - - - - -
Utilities & Telephone - - - - - - -
Materials & Supplies - - - - - - -
Contracts & Services - - - - - - -
Employee Support - - - - - - -
Grants/Contributions to Others - - - - - - -
Other Operating Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Capital Uses
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Equipment - - - - - - -
Capital Improvements - - - - - - -
Loss on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Financing Uses
Debt Principal Repaid - - - - - - -
Debt Interest Paid - - - - - - -
Other Financing Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal -
Internal Uses
Interfund Transfers Out - - 82,392 - - - -
Interfund Loans Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Used - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - 82,392 - - - -
Extraordinary Items
Extraordinary Item - - - - - - -
- - - - - - -
TOTAL USES - - 82,392 - - - -
NET - - - - - - -
FUND BALANCE - - - - - - -
* DRAFT * 40
City of Crescent City FY 2022-23 Budget
Fund: 120 American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Fund
Dept: n/a ARPA Fund - All Cost Centers Combined
FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Var Var Actual Actual Actual Budget Estimated Proposed $ %
Operating Sources
Taxes - - - - - - -
Special Assessments - - - - - - -
Licenses & Permits - - - - - - -
Fines & Penalties - - - - - - -
Other Operating Sources - - - - - - -
Operating Grants/Contributions - - - 811,797 80,650 1,358,201 1,277,551 1584% Charges for Services - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - 811,797 80,650 1,358,201 1,277,551 1584% Financing Sources
Interest Income - - - - - - -
Debt Proceeds - - - - - - -
Other Financing Sources - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Capital Sources
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Gain on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Sources
Interfund Transfers In - - - - - - -
Interfund Loans In - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Provided - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL SOURCES - - - 811,797 80,650 1,358,201 1,277,551 1584% Operating Uses
Wages & Salaries - - - - - - -
Employee Benefits - - - - - - -
Utilities & Telephone - - - - - - -
Materials & Supplies - - - - - - -
Contracts & Services - - - - - - -
Employee Support - - - - - - -
Grants/Contributions to Others - - - - - - -
Other Operating Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Capital Uses
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Equipment - - - - - - -
Capital Improvements - - - - - - -
Loss on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Financing Uses
Debt Principal Repaid - - - - - - -
Debt Interest Paid - - - - - - -
Other Financing Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal -
Internal Uses
Interfund Transfers Out - - - 80,650 80,650 1,358,201 1,277,551 1584% Interfund Loans Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Used - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - 80,650 80,650 1,358,201 1,277,551 1584%
Extraordinary Items
Extraordinary Item - - - - - - -
- - - - - - -
TOTAL USES - - - 80,650 80,650 1,358,201 1,277,551 1584% NET - - - 731,147 - - -
FUND BALANCE - - - 731,147 - - -
* DRAFT * 41
Enterprise Funds
* DRAFT * 42
City of Crescent City FY 2022-23 Budget
Fund: 412 RV Park Fund
Dept: n/a RV Park Fund - All Cost Centers Combined
FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Var Var Actual Actual Actual Budget Estimated Proposed $ %
Operating Sources
Taxes - - - - - - -
Special Assessments - - - - - - -
Licenses & Permits - - - - - - -
Fines & Penalties - - - - - - -
Other Operating Sources 4,184 7,290 12,246 15,000 10,551 19,500 8,949 85% Operating Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Charges for Services 362,612 342,376 473,332 400,000 511,959 500,000 (11,959) -2% Subtotal 366,796 349,666 485,578 415,000 522,510 519,500 (3,010) -1% Financing Sources
Interest Income 8,194 4,943 588 4,800 - -
Debt Proceeds - - - - - - -
Other Financing Sources - - - - - - -
Subtotal 8,194 4,943 588 4,800 - - -
Capital Sources
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Gain on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Sources
Interfund Transfers In - - 2,394 - - - -
Interfund Loans In - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Provided - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - 2,394 - - - -
TOTAL SOURCES 374,990 354,609 488,560 419,800 522,510 519,500 (3,010) -1% Operating Uses
Wages & Salaries 43,024 74,405 77,007 103,397 103,397 138,346 34,949 34% Employee Benefits 28,712 32,300 39,404 48,725 38,606 71,176 32,570 84% Utilities & Telephone 85,160 89,245 102,320 129,515 124,914 127,867 2,953 2% Materials & Supplies 20,968 18,670 30,970 59,525 57,679 57,258 (421) -1% Contracts & Services 33,694 27,326 48,841 127,384 95,385 119,559 24,174 25% Employee Support - - - 55 55 55 - 0%
Grants/Contributions to Others - - - - - - -
Other Operating Uses 973 973 973 1,000 1,148 1,000 (148) -13% Subtotal 212,531 242,919 299,515 469,601 421,184 515,261 94,077 22% Capital Uses
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Equipment - - - - - - -
Capital Improvements - - - - - - -
Loss on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Financing Uses
Debt Principal Repaid 230,000 - - - - - -
Debt Interest Paid 5,175 - - - - - -
Other Financing Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal 235,175 - - - - - -
Internal Uses
Interfund Transfers Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Loans Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Used 40,694 48,625 46,554 57,259 53,925 67,743 13,818 26% Subtotal 40,694 48,625 46,554 57,259 53,925 67,743 13,818 26% Extraordinary Items
Extraordinary Item - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL USES 488,400 291,544 346,069 526,860 475,109 583,004 107,895 23% NET (113,410) 63,065 142,491 (107,060) 47,401 (63,504) (110,905) -234% FUND BALANCE 1,108,042 1,112,129 1,195,642 1,088,582 1,243,043 1,179,539 (63,504) -5% WORKING CAPITAL BALANCE 157,997 224,882 369,164 262,104 416,565 353,061 (63,504) -15% Depreciation expense is not included in current year budget / estimated or upcoming year proposed columns * DRAFT * 43
City of Crescent City FY 2022-23 Budget
Fund: 413 / 913 Sewer Fund and Sewer CIP Fund
Dept: n/a Sewer Fund - All Cost Centers Combined
FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Var Var Actual Actual Actual Budget Estimated Proposed $ %
Operating Sources
Taxes - - - - - - -
Special Assessments - - - - - - -
Licenses & Permits - - - - - - -
Fines & Penalties - - - - - - -
Other Operating Sources 43,459 (18,430) 70,046 25,431 19,534 25,431 5,897 30% Operating Grants/Contributions 3,995 - - 543,405 229,870 419,405 189,535 82% Charges for Services 4,714,073 4,396,107 4,603,780 4,709,346 4,652,183 4,728,651 76,468 2% Subtotal 4,761,527 4,377,677 4,673,826 5,278,182 4,901,587 5,173,487 271,900 6% Financing Sources
Interest Income 142,383 150,645 (4,818) 34,000 (37,467) - 37,467 -100% Debt Proceeds - - - - - - -
Other Financing Sources - - - - - - -
Subtotal 142,383 150,645 (4,818) 34,000 (37,467) - 37,467 -100% Capital Sources
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Grants/Contributions 566,808 248,028 111,348 38,728 404,224 110,000 (294,224) -73% Gain on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal 566,808 248,028 111,348 38,728 404,224 110,000 (294,224) -73% Internal Sources
Interfund Transfers In 65,752 1,000,000 371 614,139 614,139 771,004 156,865 26% Interfund Loans In - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Provided - - - - - - -
Subtotal 65,752 1,000,000 371 614,139 614,139 771,004 156,865 26% TOTAL SOURCES 5,536,470 5,776,350 4,780,727 5,965,049 5,882,483 6,054,491 172,008 3% Operating Uses
Wages & Salaries 900,997 494,057 480,837 590,881 496,535 612,476 115,941 23% Employee Benefits 557,647 546,241 445,753 450,858 406,824 476,837 70,013 17% Utilities & Telephone 403,418 122,746 44,139 50,408 44,989 50,227 5,238 12% Materials & Supplies 221,612 165,564 118,307 215,055 193,740 148,023 (45,717) -24% Contracts & Services 197,456 1,565,592 1,695,613 2,492,772 1,974,808 2,652,264 677,456 34% Employee Support 13,592 6,329 2,031 24,375 17,965 27,974 10,009 56% Grants/Contributions to Others - - - - 104,000 - (104,000) -100% Other Operating Uses 51,143 54,027 56,467 82,100 85,106 93,150 8,044 9% Subtotal 2,345,865 2,954,556 2,843,147 3,906,449 3,323,967 4,060,951 736,984 22% Capital Uses
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Equipment - - - - - - -
Capital Improvements 93,432 188,158 371,083 1,161,204 - 1,813,000 1,813,000 Loss on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal 93,432 188,158 371,083 1,161,204 - 1,813,000 1,813,000 Financing Uses
Debt Principal Repaid 1,400,000 1,500,000 1,600,000 1,697,663 1,697,663 1,697,663 - 0% Debt Interest Paid - - - - - - -
Other Financing Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal 1,400,000 1,500,000 1,600,000 1,697,663 1,697,663 1,697,663 - 0% Internal Uses
Interfund Transfers Out 65,752 1,000,000 24,188 673,650 673,466 808,100 134,634 20% Interfund Loans Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Used 323,430 331,824 373,043 438,661 367,894 497,308 129,414 35% Subtotal 389,182 1,331,824 397,231 1,112,311 1,041,360 1,305,408 264,048 25% Extraordinary Items
Extraordinary Item - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL USES 4,228,479 5,974,538 5,211,461 7,877,627 6,062,990 8,877,022 2,814,032 46% NET 1,307,991 (198,188) (430,734) (1,912,578) (180,507) (2,822,531) (2,642,024) 1464% FUND BALANCE 8,140,401 7,747,435 7,531,480 5,618,902 7,350,973 4,528,442 (2,822,531) -38% WORKING CAPITAL BALANCE 6,305,740 6,111,419 5,687,895 3,775,317 5,507,388 2,684,857 (2,822,531) -51% Interfund Transfers between the Sewer Enterprise and Sewer CIP Funds are shown for transparency, but should be netted for analysis purposes Depreciation expense is not included in current year budget / estimated or upcoming year proposed columns * DRAFT * 44
City of Crescent City FY 2022-23 Budget
Fund: 413 Sewer Fund
Dept: 111/112/120/130 City Manager, Econ Dev / Grants, Finance, City Attorney * Prior to FY 19-20, Admin included Human Resources as Dept. 114. Beginning FY 19-20, HR is billed as an ISF to each operational department.
FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Var Var Actual Actual Actual Budget Estimated Proposed $ %
Operating Sources
Taxes - - - - - - -
Special Assessments - - - - - - -
Licenses & Permits - - - - - - -
Fines & Penalties - - - - - - -
Other Operating Sources - - - - - - -
Operating Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Charges for Services - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Financing Sources
Interest Income - - - - - - -
Debt Proceeds - - - - - - -
Other Financing Sources - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Capital Sources
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Gain on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Sources
Interfund Transfers In - - - 13,139 13,139 29,004 15,865 121% Interfund Loans In - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Provided - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - 13,139 13,139 29,004 15,865 121%
TOTAL SOURCES - - - 13,139 13,139 29,004 15,865 121%
Operating Uses
Wages & Salaries 172,811 150,027 156,007 173,295 177,128 209,201 32,073 18% Employee Benefits 101,494 92,656 112,064 130,000 129,622 168,187 38,565 30% Utilities & Telephone 3,374 4,437 4,700 6,898 5,275 6,467 1,192 23% Materials & Supplies 14,266 23,285 11,831 19,102 17,328 20,549 3,221 19% Contracts & Services 70,687 66,430 74,354 94,195 74,507 108,994 34,487 46% Employee Support 4,652 4,061 1,231 8,940 7,530 13,374 5,844 78% Grants/Contributions to Others - - - - - - -
Other Operating Uses 907 - 927 1,000 944 1,000 56 6%
Subtotal 368,191 340,896 361,114 433,430 412,334 527,772 115,438 28% Capital Uses
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Equipment - - - - - - -
Capital Improvements - - - - - - -
Loss on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Financing Uses
Debt Principal Repaid - - - - - - -
Debt Interest Paid - - - - - - -
Other Financing Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Uses
Interfund Transfers Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Loans Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Used 48,560 46,537 87,012 106,127 90,616 151,116 60,500 67% Subtotal 48,560 46,537 87,012 106,127 90,616 151,116 60,500 67% Extraordinary Items
Extraordinary Item - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL USES 416,751 387,433 448,126 539,557 502,950 678,888 175,938 35% NET (416,751) (387,433) (448,126) (526,418) (489,811) (649,884) (160,073) 33% Interfund Transfers between the Sewer Enterprise and Sewer CIP Funds are shown for transparency but should be netted for analysis purposes Depreciation expense is not included in current year budget / estimated or upcoming year proposed columns * DRAFT * 45
City of Crescent City FY 2022-23 Budget
Fund: 413 Sewer Fund
Dept: 351 Lab
FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Var Var Actual Actual Actual Budget Estimated Proposed $ %
Operating Sources
Taxes - - - - - - -
Special Assessments - - - - - - -
Licenses & Permits - - - - - - -
Fines & Penalties - - - - - - -
Other Operating Sources - - - - - - -
Operating Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Charges for Services 108,839 96,892 118,367 116,000 116,000 116,000 - 0% Subtotal 108,839 96,892 118,367 116,000 116,000 116,000 - 0% Financing Sources
Interest Income - - - - - - -
Debt Proceeds - - - - - - -
Other Financing Sources - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Capital Sources
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Gain on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Sources
Interfund Transfers In - - - - - - -
Interfund Loans In - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Provided - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL SOURCES 108,839 96,892 118,367 116,000 116,000 116,000 - 0% Operating Uses
Wages & Salaries 148,939 96,023 110,740 128,094 104,381 149,229 44,848 43% Employee Benefits 82,719 115,574 117,542 99,812 88,445 103,604 15,159 17% Utilities & Telephone 16,313 13,716 16,364 17,100 17,623 17,100 (523) -3% Materials & Supplies 44,014 45,337 66,615 59,720 56,384 64,600 8,216 15% Contracts & Services 10,245 5,631 6,444 18,200 17,862 53,200 35,338 198% Employee Support 2,726 1,536 576 4,500 1,500 4,500 3,000 200% Grants/Contributions to Others - - - - - - -
Other Operating Uses 10,534 12,720 12,387 15,050 15,050 15,500 450 3% Subtotal 315,490 290,537 330,668 342,476 301,245 407,733 106,488 35% Capital Uses
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Equipment - - - - - - -
Capital Improvements - - - - - - -
Loss on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Financing Uses
Debt Principal Repaid - - - - - - -
Debt Interest Paid - - - - - - -
Other Financing Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Uses
Interfund Transfers Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Loans Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Used 36,754 41,145 80,151 86,962 74,247 101,241 26,994 36% Subtotal 36,754 41,145 80,151 86,962 74,247 101,241 26,994 36% Extraordinary Items
Extraordinary Item - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL USES 352,244 331,682 410,819 429,438 375,492 508,974 133,482 36% NET (243,405) (234,790) (292,452) (313,438) (259,492) (392,974) (133,482) 51% Interfund Transfers between the Sewer Enterprise and Sewer CIP Funds are shown for transparency but should be netted for analysis purposes Depreciation expense is not included in current year budget / estimated or upcoming year proposed columns * DRAFT * 46
City of Crescent City FY 2022-23 Budget
Fund: 413 Sewer Fund
Dept: 352 WWTP Operations
FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Var Var Actual Actual Actual Budget Estimated Proposed $ %
Operating Sources
Taxes - - - - - - -
Special Assessments - - - - - - -
Licenses & Permits - - - - - - -
Fines & Penalties - - - - - - -
Other Operating Sources - 2,880 7,345 - - - -
Operating Grants/Contributions - - - 543,405 104,000 419,405 315,405 303% Charges for Services - - - - - - -
Subtotal - 2,880 7,345 543,405 104,000 419,405 315,405 303% Financing Sources
Interest Income - - - - - - -
Debt Proceeds - - - - - - -
Other Financing Sources - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Capital Sources
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Gain on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Sources
Interfund Transfers In - - - - - - -
Interfund Loans In - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Provided - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL SOURCES - 2,880 7,345 543,405 104,000 419,405 315,405 303% Operating Uses
Wages & Salaries 276,128 76,478 28,201 43,149 43,777 66,868 23,091 53% Employee Benefits 167,088 128,435 29,903 29,939 29,939 55,939 26,000 87% Utilities & Telephone 373,708 95,774 14,857 15,000 13,702 15,000 1,298 9% Materials & Supplies 101,509 39,602 1,553 2,000 2,982 2,000 (982) -33% Contracts & Services 71,733 1,467,699 1,586,586 2,165,087 1,723,997 2,126,210 402,213 23% Employee Support 5,156 - - 2,000 - 2,000 2,000
Grants/Contributions to Others - - - - 104,000 - (104,000) -100% Other Operating Uses 37,153 38,411 39,473 61,800 61,800 42,800 (19,000) -31% Subtotal 1,032,475 1,846,399 1,700,573 2,318,975 1,980,197 2,310,817 330,620 17% Capital Uses
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Equipment - - - - - - -
Capital Improvements - - - - - - -
Loss on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Financing Uses
Debt Principal Repaid 1,400,000 1,500,000 1,600,000 1,697,663 1,697,663 1,697,663 - 0% Debt Interest Paid - - - - - - -
Other Financing Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal 1,400,000 1,500,000 1,600,000 1,697,663 1,697,663 1,697,663 - 0% Internal Uses
Interfund Transfers Out 65,752 950,000 - 601,000 601,000 742,000 141,000 23% Interfund Loans Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Used 148,350 91,295 23,907 26,042 21,708 55,498 33,790 156% Subtotal 214,102 1,041,295 23,907 627,042 622,708 797,498 174,790 28% Extraordinary Items
Extraordinary Item - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL USES 2,646,577 4,387,694 3,324,480 4,643,680 4,300,568 4,805,978 505,410 12% NET (2,646,577) (4,384,814) (3,317,135) (4,100,275) (4,196,568) (4,386,573) (190,005) 5% Interfund Transfers between the Sewer Enterprise and Sewer CIP Funds are shown for transparency but should be netted for analysis purposes Depreciation expense is not included in current year budget / estimated or upcoming year proposed columns * DRAFT * 47
City of Crescent City FY 2022-23 Budget
Fund: 413 Sewer Fund
Dept: 353 Collection System
FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Var Var Actual Actual Actual Budget Estimated Proposed $ %
Operating Sources
Taxes - - - - - - -
Special Assessments - - - - - - -
Licenses & Permits - - - - - - -
Fines & Penalties - - - - - - -
Other Operating Sources 43,459 (21,310) 62,701 25,431 19,534 25,431 5,897 30% Operating Grants/Contributions 3,995 - - - 125,870 - (125,870) -100% Charges for Services 4,530,738 4,235,694 4,398,255 4,351,690 4,479,282 4,434,228 (45,054) -1% Subtotal 4,578,192 4,214,384 4,460,956 4,377,121 4,624,686 4,459,659 (165,027) -4% Financing Sources
Interest Income 138,736 128,312 (3,703) 34,000 (37,467) - 37,467 -100% Debt Proceeds - - - - - - -
Other Financing Sources - - - - - - -
Subtotal 138,736 128,312 (3,703) 34,000 (37,467) - 37,467 -100% Capital Sources
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Grants/Contributions 566,808 248,028 111,348 38,728 404,224 110,000 (294,224) -73% Gain on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal 566,808 248,028 111,348 38,728 404,224 110,000 (294,224) -73% Internal Sources
Interfund Transfers In - - 371 - - - -
Interfund Loans In - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Provided - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - 371 - - - -
TOTAL SOURCES 5,283,736 4,590,724 4,568,972 4,449,849 4,991,443 4,569,659 (421,784) -8% Operating Uses
Wages & Salaries 105,896 86,272 92,634 107,541 103,322 75,378 (27,944) -27% Employee Benefits 76,266 97,529 97,712 94,660 86,127 63,825 (22,302) -26% Utilities & Telephone 10,019 8,819 8,218 11,410 8,389 11,660 3,271 39% Materials & Supplies 17,140 19,727 23,303 52,733 49,547 39,374 (10,173) -21% Contracts & Services 912 10,074 3,638 46,550 46,374 221,750 175,376 378% Employee Support 423 141 139 2,100 2,100 6,100 4,000 190% Grants/Contributions to Others - - - - - - -
Other Operating Uses 2,286 2,625 3,373 3,700 3,700 33,300 29,600 800% Subtotal 212,942 225,187 229,017 318,694 299,559 451,387 151,828 51% Capital Uses
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Equipment - - - - - - -
Capital Improvements - - - - - - -
Loss on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Financing Uses
Debt Principal Repaid - - - - - - -
Debt Interest Paid - - - - - - -
Other Financing Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Uses
Interfund Transfers Out - 50,000 - 72,650 72,466 66,100 (6,366) -9% Interfund Loans Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Used 27,473 78,959 110,729 135,719 109,969 110,537 568 1% Subtotal 27,473 128,959 110,729 208,369 182,435 176,637 (5,798) -3% Extraordinary Items
Extraordinary Item - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL USES 240,415 354,146 339,746 527,063 481,994 628,024 146,030 30% NET 5,043,321 4,236,578 4,229,226 3,922,786 4,509,449 3,941,635 (567,814) -13% Interfund Transfers between the Sewer Enterprise and Sewer CIP Funds are shown for transparency but should be netted for analysis purposes Depreciation expense is not included in current year budget / estimated or upcoming year proposed columns * DRAFT * 48
City of Crescent City FY 2022-23 Budget
Fund: 413 Sewer Fund
Dept: 356 County Community Service Area
FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Var Var Actual Actual Actual Budget Estimated Proposed $ %
Operating Sources
Taxes - - - - - - -
Special Assessments - - - - - - -
Licenses & Permits - - - - - - -
Fines & Penalties - - - - - - -
Other Operating Sources - - - - - - -
Operating Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Charges for Services 74,496 63,521 87,158 241,656 56,901 178,423 121,522 214% Subtotal 74,496 63,521 87,158 241,656 56,901 178,423 121,522 214% Financing Sources
Interest Income - - - - - - -
Debt Proceeds - - - - - - -
Other Financing Sources - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Capital Sources
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Gain on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Sources
Interfund Transfers In - - - - - - -
Interfund Loans In - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Provided - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL SOURCES 74,496 63,521 87,158 241,656 56,901 178,423 121,522 214% Operating Uses
Wages & Salaries 25,309 27,716 39,025 83,849 20,027 53,963 33,936 169% Employee Benefits 12,638 18,247 34,281 56,973 36,292 41,400 5,108 14% Utilities & Telephone - - - - - - -
Materials & Supplies 7,689 14,003 11,251 20,000 5,999 21,500 15,501 258% Contracts & Services 27,461 3,815 11,689 37,110 17,142 37,110 19,968 116% Employee Support - - - - - - -
Grants/Contributions to Others - - - - - - -
Other Operating Uses 263 271 307 550 3,612 550 (3,062) -85% Subtotal 73,360 64,052 96,553 198,482 83,072 154,523 71,451 86% Capital Uses
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Equipment - - - - - - -
Capital Improvements - - - - - - -
Loss on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Financing Uses
Debt Principal Repaid - - - - - - -
Debt Interest Paid - - - - - - -
Other Financing Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Uses
Interfund Transfers Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Loans Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Used 10,860 16,799 41,003 52,436 44,564 38,186 (6,378) -14% Subtotal 10,860 16,799 41,003 52,436 44,564 38,186 (6,378) -14% Extraordinary Items
Extraordinary Item - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL USES 84,220 80,851 137,556 250,918 127,636 192,709 65,073 51% NET (9,724) (17,330) (50,398) (9,262) (70,735) (14,286) 56,449 -80% Interfund Transfers between the Sewer Enterprise and Sewer CIP Funds are shown for transparency but should be netted for analysis purposes Depreciation expense is not included in current year budget / estimated or upcoming year proposed columns * DRAFT * 49
City of Crescent City FY 2022-23 Budget
Fund: 413 Sewer Fund
Dept: 357 WWTP Maintenance
FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Var Var Actual Actual Actual Budget Estimated Proposed $ %
Operating Sources
Taxes - - - - - - -
Special Assessments - - - - - - -
Licenses & Permits - - - - - - -
Fines & Penalties - - - - - - -
Other Operating Sources - - - - - - -
Operating Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Charges for Services - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Financing Sources
Interest Income - - - - - - -
Debt Proceeds - - - - - - -
Other Financing Sources - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Capital Sources
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Gain on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Sources
Interfund Transfers In - - - - - - -
Interfund Loans In - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Provided - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL SOURCES - - - - - - -
Operating Uses
Wages & Salaries 171,914 57,541 54,230 54,953 47,900 57,837 9,937 21% Employee Benefits 117,442 93,800 54,251 39,474 36,399 43,882 7,483 21% Utilities & Telephone 4 - - - - - -
Materials & Supplies 36,994 23,610 3,754 61,500 61,500 - (61,500) -100% Contracts & Services 16,418 11,943 12,902 131,630 94,926 105,000 10,074 11% Employee Support 635 591 85 6,835 6,835 2,000 (4,835) -71% Grants/Contributions to Others - - - - - - -
Other Operating Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal 343,407 187,485 125,222 294,392 247,560 208,719 (38,841) -16% Capital Uses
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Equipment - - - - - - -
Capital Improvements - - - - - - -
Loss on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Financing Uses
Debt Principal Repaid - - - - - - -
Debt Interest Paid - - - - - - -
Other Financing Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Uses
Interfund Transfers Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Loans Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Used 51,433 57,089 30,241 31,375 26,790 40,730 13,940 52% Subtotal 51,433 57,089 30,241 31,375 26,790 40,730 13,940 52% Extraordinary Items
Extraordinary Item - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL USES 394,840 244,574 155,463 325,767 274,350 249,449 (24,901) -9% NET (394,840) (244,574) (155,463) (325,767) (274,350) (249,449) 24,901 -9% Interfund Transfers between the Sewer Enterprise and Sewer CIP Funds are shown for transparency but should be netted for analysis purposes Depreciation expense is not included in current year budget / estimated or upcoming year proposed columns * DRAFT * 50
City of Crescent City FY 2022-23 Budget
Fund: 913 Sewer CIP Fund
Dept: n/a Sewer CIP Fund - All Cost Centers Combined
FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Var Var Actual Actual Actual Budget Estimated Proposed $ %
Operating Sources
Taxes - - - - - - -
Special Assessments - - - - - - -
Licenses & Permits - - - - - - -
Fines & Penalties - - - - - - -
Other Operating Sources - - - - - - -
Operating Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Charges for Services - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Financing Sources
Interest Income 3,647 22,333 (1,115) - - - -
Debt Proceeds - - - - - - -
Other Financing Sources - - - - - - -
Subtotal 3,647 22,333 (1,115) - - - -
Capital Sources
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Gain on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Sources
Interfund Transfers In 65,752 1,000,000 - 601,000 601,000 742,000 141,000 23% Interfund Loans In - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Provided - - - - - - -
Subtotal 65,752 1,000,000 - 601,000 601,000 742,000 141,000 23% TOTAL SOURCES 69,399 1,022,333 (1,115) 601,000 601,000 742,000 141,000 23% Operating Uses
Wages & Salaries - - - - - - -
Employee Benefits - - - - - - -
Utilities & Telephone - - - - - - -
Materials & Supplies - - - - - - -
Contracts & Services - - - - - - -
Employee Support - - - - - - -
Grants/Contributions to Others - - - - - - -
Other Operating Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Capital Uses
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Equipment - - - - - - -
Capital Improvements 93,432 188,158 371,083 1,161,204 - 1,813,000 1,813,000 Loss on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal 93,432 188,158 371,083 1,161,204 - 1,813,000 1,813,000 Financing Uses
Debt Principal Repaid - - - - - - -
Debt Interest Paid - - - - - - -
Other Financing Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Uses
Interfund Transfers Out - - 24,188 - - - -
Interfund Loans Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Used - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - 24,188 - - - -
Extraordinary Items
Extraordinary Item - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL USES 93,432 188,158 395,271 1,161,204 - 1,813,000 1,813,000 NET (24,033) 834,175 (396,386) (560,204) 601,000 (1,071,000) (1,672,000) -278% Interfund Transfers between the Sewer Enterprise and Sewer CIP Funds are shown for transparency but should be netted for analysis purposes Depreciation expense is not included in current year budget / estimated or upcoming year proposed columns * DRAFT * 51
City of Crescent City FY 2022-23 Budget
Fund: 913 Sewer Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) Fund Dept: n/a All Cost Centers Combined
Summary of Sewer CIP Projects
Capital projects often take place over more than one fiscal year. The project is budgeted when funded and approved, and the unspent budget amount carries forward until the project is complete. The following shows planned projects and their estimated budget amounts for this fiscal year. For projects that began in a prior year, the amount shown below is the estimated amount remaining.
Project Funding Source(s) Estimated Budget FY 22-23
Membrane replacement / mem pulse City Sewer Fund 560,000 RBC gear box and bearing rehab City Sewer Fund 120,000
RBC valve City Sewer Fund 90,000
Boiler City Sewer Fund 300,000
Influent gate City Sewer Fund 184,000
Secondary clarifiers - valves and meters City Sewer Fund 80,000 C water meter City Sewer Fund 12,000
Primary effluent flow City Sewer Fund 120,000
MBR lighting and outlets City Sewer Fund 28,000
Chemical room lighting City Sewer Fund 50,000
Chlorine analyzers City Sewer Fund 31,000
Digester valves City Sewer Fund 80,000
Laser alignment tool City Sewer Fund 18,000
West hypo storage tank City Sewer Fund 140,000
1,813,000
* DRAFT * 52
City of Crescent City FY 2022-23 Budget
Fund: 419 / 919 Water Fund and Water CIP Fund
Dept: n/a Water Fund - All Cost Centers Combined
FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Var Var Actual Actual Actual Budget Estimated Proposed $ %
Operating Sources
Taxes - - - - - - -
Special Assessments - - - - - - -
Licenses & Permits - - - - - - -
Fines & Penalties - - - - - - -
Other Operating Sources 11,774 (17,437) 15,597 40,080 13,394 25,080 11,686 87% Operating Grants/Contributions 1,167 - - - 74,144 - (74,144) -100% Charges for Services 2,870,210 2,763,233 2,746,114 2,751,807 2,713,053 2,690,039 (23,014) -1% Subtotal 2,883,151 2,745,796 2,761,711 2,791,887 2,800,591 2,715,119 (85,472) -3% Financing Sources
Interest Income 65,884 63,309 10,044 28,000 (18,315) - 18,315 -100% Debt Proceeds - - - - - - -
Other Financing Sources - - - - - - -
Subtotal 65,884 63,309 10,044 28,000 (18,315) - 18,315 -100% Capital Sources
Capital Leases/Rentals 19,512 23,060 19,512 19,869 19,869 19,869 - 0% Capital Grants/Contributions 75,840 57,525 267,590 32,400 131,625 55,000 (76,625) -58% Gain on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal 95,352 80,585 287,102 52,269 151,494 74,869 (76,625) -51% Internal Sources
Interfund Transfers In 656,914 442,000 131,001 986,697 987,033 249,004 (738,029) -75% Interfund Loans In - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Provided - - - - - - -
Subtotal 656,914 442,000 131,001 986,697 987,033 249,004 (738,029) -75% TOTAL SOURCES 3,701,301 3,331,690 3,189,858 3,858,853 3,920,803 3,038,992 (881,811) -22% Operating Uses
Wages & Salaries 534,209 558,089 562,859 558,790 551,019 665,456 114,437 21% Employee Benefits 362,146 439,522 400,182 372,966 333,409 424,621 91,212 27% Utilities & Telephone 221,637 226,641 200,893 238,532 204,725 230,721 25,996 13% Materials & Supplies 131,160 159,390 243,194 168,125 122,467 179,963 57,496 47% Contracts & Services 173,681 229,318 258,755 505,454 438,033 302,169 (135,864) -31% Employee Support 7,879 6,257 3,975 20,815 19,017 27,974 8,957 47% Grants/Contributions to Others - - - - 74,144 - (74,144) -100% Other Operating Uses 12,191 13,569 15,093 21,200 18,955 21,800 2,845 15% Subtotal 1,442,903 1,632,786 1,684,951 1,885,882 1,761,769 1,852,704 90,935 5% Capital Uses
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Equipment - - - - - - -
Capital Improvements 360,115 158,630 440,968 1,164,966 38,733 1,331,556 1,292,823 3338% Loss on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal 360,115 158,630 440,968 1,164,966 38,733 1,331,556 1,292,823 3338% Financing Uses
Debt Principal Repaid 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 - 0% Debt Interest Paid - - - - - - -
Other Financing Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 - 0% Internal Uses
Interfund Transfers Out 656,914 442,000 130,500 1,064,650 1,063,702 373,300 (690,402) -65% Interfund Loans Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Used 351,872 426,648 401,542 472,041 393,538 530,279 136,741 35% Subtotal 1,008,786 868,648 532,042 1,536,691 1,457,240 903,579 (553,661) -38% Extraordinary Items
Extraordinary Item - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL USES 3,161,804 3,010,064 3,007,961 4,937,539 3,607,742 4,437,839 830,097 23% NET 539,497 321,626 181,897 (1,078,686) 313,061 (1,398,847) (1,711,908) -547% FUND BALANCE 9,631,710 10,234,212 10,980,479 9,901,793 11,293,540 9,894,693 (1,398,847) -12% WORKING CAPITAL BALANCE 2,580,622 2,345,977 3,026,123 1,947,437 3,339,184 1,940,337 (1,398,847) -42% Interfund Transfers between the Water Enterprise and Water CIP Funds are shown for transparency, but should be netted for analysis purposes Depreciation expense is not included in current year budget / estimated or upcoming year proposed columns * DRAFT * 53
City of Crescent City FY 2022-23 Budget
Fund: 419 Water Fund
Dept: 111/112/120/130 City Manager, Econ Dev / Grants, Finance, City Attorney * Prior to FY 19-20, Admin included Human Resources as Dept. 114. Beginning FY 19-20, HR is billed as an ISF to each operational department.
FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Var Var Actual Actual Actual Budget Estimated Proposed $ %
Operating Sources
Taxes - - - - - - -
Special Assessments - - - - - - -
Licenses & Permits - - - - - - -
Fines & Penalties - - - - - - -
Other Operating Sources - - - - - - -
Operating Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Charges for Services - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Financing Sources
Interest Income - - - - - - -
Debt Proceeds - - - - - - -
Other Financing Sources - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Capital Sources
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Gain on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Sources
Interfund Transfers In - - - 13,139 13,475 29,004 15,529 115% Interfund Loans In - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Provided - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - 13,139 13,475 29,004 15,529 115%
TOTAL SOURCES - - - 13,139 13,475 29,004 15,529 115%
Operating Uses
Wages & Salaries 163,047 158,852 158,749 177,763 170,722 213,548 42,826 25% Employee Benefits 93,294 96,009 93,907 111,406 101,047 133,655 32,608 32% Utilities & Telephone 4,253 5,286 5,611 7,698 6,023 7,331 1,308 22% Materials & Supplies 13,967 22,401 11,858 18,352 17,450 20,989 3,539 20% Contracts & Services 59,536 71,536 87,093 87,070 70,687 73,369 2,682 4% Employee Support 4,902 4,136 1,231 9,280 8,073 13,374 5,301 66% Grants/Contributions to Others - - - - - - -
Other Operating Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal 338,999 358,220 358,449 411,569 374,002 462,266 88,264 24% Capital Uses
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Equipment - - - - - - -
Capital Improvements - - - - - - -
Loss on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Financing Uses
Debt Principal Repaid - - - - - - -
Debt Interest Paid - - - - - - -
Other Financing Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Uses
Interfund Transfers Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Loans Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Used 81,636 96,259 83,914 112,323 96,077 139,552 43,475 45% Subtotal 81,636 96,259 83,914 112,323 96,077 139,552 43,475 45% Extraordinary Items
Extraordinary Item - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL USES 420,635 454,479 442,363 523,892 470,079 601,818 131,739 28% NET (420,635) (454,479) (442,363) (510,753) (456,604) (572,814) (116,210) 25% Interfund Transfers between the Water Enterprise and Water CIP Funds are shown for transparency, but should be netted for analysis purposes Depreciation expense is not included in current year budget / estimated or upcoming year proposed columns * DRAFT * 54
City of Crescent City FY 2022-23 Budget
Fund: 419 Water Fund
Dept: 371 Water Operations
FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Var Var Actual Actual Actual Budget Estimated Proposed $ %
Operating Sources
Taxes - - - - - - -
Special Assessments - - - - - - -
Licenses & Permits - - - - - - -
Fines & Penalties - - - - - - -
Other Operating Sources 11,774 (17,437) 15,597 40,080 13,394 25,080 11,686 87% Operating Grants/Contributions 1,167 - - - 74,144 - (74,144) -100% Charges for Services 2,866,639 2,759,665 2,742,810 2,748,507 2,709,753 2,686,739 (23,014) -1% Subtotal 2,879,580 2,742,228 2,758,407 2,788,587 2,797,291 2,711,819 (85,472) -3% Financing Sources
Interest Income 65,772 53,245 9,782 28,000 (18,315) - 18,315 -100% Debt Proceeds - - - - - - -
Other Financing Sources - - - - - - -
Subtotal 65,772 53,245 9,782 28,000 (18,315) - 18,315 -100% Capital Sources
Capital Leases/Rentals 19,512 23,060 19,512 19,869 19,869 19,869 - 0% Capital Grants/Contributions 75,840 57,525 267,590 32,400 131,625 55,000 (76,625) -58% Gain on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal 95,352 80,585 287,102 52,269 151,494 74,869 (76,625) -51% Internal Sources
Interfund Transfers In - - 36,001 - - - -
Interfund Loans In - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Provided - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - 36,001 - - - -
TOTAL SOURCES 3,040,704 2,876,058 3,091,292 2,868,856 2,930,470 2,786,688 (143,782) -5% Operating Uses
Wages & Salaries 354,239 383,368 378,831 359,531 348,592 430,069 81,477 23% Employee Benefits 257,910 333,809 292,983 246,623 223,049 276,142 53,093 24% Utilities & Telephone 217,384 221,355 195,282 230,834 198,702 223,390 24,688 12% Materials & Supplies 116,806 136,119 230,877 139,773 102,225 148,974 46,749 46% Contracts & Services 112,986 156,889 171,662 415,584 364,546 226,000 (138,546) -38% Employee Support 2,977 2,121 2,744 11,535 10,944 14,600 3,656 33% Grants/Contributions to Others - - - - 74,144 - (74,144) -100% Other Operating Uses 11,797 13,163 12,859 18,800 16,555 19,400 2,845 17% Subtotal 1,074,099 1,246,824 1,285,238 1,422,680 1,338,757 1,338,575 (182) 0% Capital Uses
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Equipment - - - - - - -
Capital Improvements - - - - - - -
Loss on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Financing Uses
Debt Principal Repaid 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 - 0% Debt Interest Paid - - - - - - -
Other Financing Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 - 0% Internal Uses
Interfund Transfers Out 656,914 442,000 95,000 1,064,650 1,063,702 373,300 (690,402) -65% Interfund Loans Out - - - - - -
Interfund Services Used 264,759 323,774 311,829 346,302 286,010 375,991 89,981 31% Subtotal 921,673 765,774 406,829 1,410,952 1,349,712 749,291 (600,421) -44% Extraordinary Items
Extraordinary Item - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL USES 2,345,772 2,362,598 2,042,067 3,183,632 3,038,469 2,437,866 (600,603) -20% NET 694,932 513,460 1,049,225 (314,776) (107,999) 348,822 456,821 -423% Interfund Transfers between the Water Enterprise and Water CIP Funds are shown for transparency, but should be netted for analysis purposes Depreciation expense is not included in current year budget / estimated or upcoming year proposed columns * DRAFT * 55
City of Crescent City FY 2022-23 Budget
Fund: 419 Water Fund
Dept: 372 Community Service Districts
FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Var Var Actual Actual Actual Budget Estimated Proposed $ %
Operating Sources
Taxes - - - - - - -
Special Assessments - - - - - - -
Licenses & Permits - - - - - - -
Fines & Penalties - - - - - - -
Other Operating Sources - - - - - - -
Operating Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Charges for Services 3,571 3,568 3,304 3,300 3,300 3,300 - 0% Subtotal 3,571 3,568 3,304 3,300 3,300 3,300 - 0%
Financing Sources
Interest Income - - - - - - -
Debt Proceeds - - - - - - -
Other Financing Sources - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Capital Sources
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Gain on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Sources
Interfund Transfers In - - - - - - -
Interfund Loans In - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Provided - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL SOURCES 3,571 3,568 3,304 3,300 3,300 3,300 - 0%
Operating Uses
Wages & Salaries 16,923 15,869 25,279 21,496 31,705 21,839 (9,866) -31% Employee Benefits 10,942 9,704 13,292 14,937 9,313 14,824 5,511 59% Utilities & Telephone - - - - - - -
Materials & Supplies 387 870 459 10,000 2,792 10,000 7,208 258% Contracts & Services 1,159 893 - 2,800 2,800 2,800 - 0% Employee Support - - - - - - -
Grants/Contributions to Others - - - - - - -
Other Operating Uses 394 406 2,234 2,400 2,400 2,400 - 0% Subtotal 29,805 27,742 41,264 51,633 49,010 51,863 2,853 6% Capital Uses
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Equipment - - - - - - -
Capital Improvements - - - - - - -
Loss on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Financing Uses
Debt Principal Repaid - - - - - - -
Debt Interest Paid - - - - - - -
Other Financing Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Uses
Interfund Transfers Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Loans Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Used 5,477 6,615 5,799 13,416 11,451 14,736 3,285 29% Subtotal 5,477 6,615 5,799 13,416 11,451 14,736 3,285 29% Extraordinary Items
Extraordinary Item - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL USES 35,282 34,357 47,063 65,049 60,461 66,599 6,138 10% NET (31,711) (30,789) (43,759) (61,749) (57,161) (63,299) (6,138) 11% Interfund Transfers between the Water Enterprise and Water CIP Funds are shown for transparency, but should be netted for analysis purposes Depreciation expense is not included in current year budget / estimated or upcoming year proposed columns * DRAFT * 56
City of Crescent City FY 2022-23 Budget
Fund: 919 Water CIP Fund
Dept: n/a Water CIP Fund - All Cost Centers Combined
FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Var Var Actual Actual Actual Budget Estimated Proposed $ %
Operating Sources
Taxes - - - - - - -
Special Assessments - - - - - - -
Licenses & Permits - - - - - - -
Fines & Penalties - - - - - - -
Other Operating Sources - - - - - - -
Operating Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Charges for Services - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Financing Sources
Interest Income 112 10,064 262 - - - -
Debt Proceeds - - - - - - -
Other Financing Sources - - - - - - -
Subtotal 112 10,064 262 - - - -
Capital Sources
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Gain on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Sources
Interfund Transfers In 656,914 442,000 95,000 973,558 973,558 220,000 (753,558) -77% Interfund Loans In - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Provided - - - - - - -
Subtotal 656,914 442,000 95,000 973,558 973,558 220,000 (753,558) -77% TOTAL SOURCES 657,026 452,064 95,262 973,558 973,558 220,000 (753,558) -77% Operating Uses
Wages & Salaries - - - - - - -
Employee Benefits - - - - - - -
Utilities & Telephone - - - - - - -
Materials & Supplies - - - - - - -
Contracts & Services - - - - - - -
Employee Support - - - - - - -
Grants/Contributions to Others - - - - - - -
Other Operating Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Capital Uses
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Equipment - - - - - - -
Capital Improvements 360,115 158,630 440,968 1,164,966 38,733 1,331,556 1,292,823 3338% Loss on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal 360,115 158,630 440,968 1,164,966 38,733 1,331,556 1,292,823 3338% Financing Uses
Debt Principal Repaid - - - - - - -
Debt Interest Paid - - - - - - -
Other Financing Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Uses
Interfund Transfers Out - - 35,500 - - - -
Interfund Loans Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Used - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - 35,500 - - - -
Extraordinary Items
Extraordinary Item - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL USES 360,115 158,630 476,468 1,164,966 38,733 1,331,556 1,292,823 3338% NET 296,911 293,434 (381,206) (191,408) 934,825 (1,111,556) (2,046,381) -219% Interfund Transfers between the Water Enterprise and Water CIP Funds are shown for transparency, but should be netted for analysis purposes Depreciation expense is not included in current year budget / estimated or upcoming year proposed columns * DRAFT * 57
City of Crescent City FY 2022-23 Budget
Fund: 919 Water Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) Fund Dept: n/a All Cost Centers Combined
Summary of Water CIP Projects
Capital projects often take place over more than one fiscal year. The project is budgeted when funded and approved, and the unspent budget amount carries forward until the project is complete. The following shows planned projects and their estimated budget amounts for this fiscal year. For projects that began in a prior year, the amount shown below is the estimated amount remaining.
Project Funding Source(s) Estimated Budget FY 22-23
Elevated tank City Water Fund 98,139
Amador tank rehabilitation City Water Fund 748,417
Washington tank rehabilitation (design) City Water Fund 75,000 PRV generator City Water Fund 60,000
Ranney VFD City Water Fund 30,000
Water main replacement - Front Street (G to I Street) City Water Fund 150,000 Surge protection (design) City Water Fund 70,000
Large valve replacements City Water Fund 100,000
1,331,556
* DRAFT * 58
Internal Service Funds
* DRAFT * 59
City of Crescent City FY 2022-23 Budget
Fund: 420 Information Technology Fund
Dept: 115 Information Technology
FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Var Var Actual Actual Actual Budget Estimated Proposed $ %
Operating Sources
Taxes - - - - - - -
Special Assessments - - - - - - -
Licenses & Permits - - - - - - -
Fines & Penalties - - - - - - -
Other Operating Sources - - - - - - -
Operating Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Charges for Services - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Financing Sources
Interest Income - - - - - - -
Debt Proceeds - - - - - - -
Other Financing Sources - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Capital Sources
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Gain on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Sources
Interfund Transfers In - - 21,331 18,000 18,000 4,500 (13,500) -75% Interfund Loans In - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Provided 199,852 261,115 213,816 293,427 293,427 366,616 73,189 25% Subtotal 199,852 261,115 235,147 311,427 311,427 371,116 59,689 19% TOTAL SOURCES 199,852 261,115 235,147 311,427 311,427 371,116 59,689 19% Operating Uses
Wages & Salaries 86,205 93,664 94,274 121,515 121,515 152,760 31,245 26% Employee Benefits 59,667 51,258 53,052 70,392 70,392 89,232 18,840 27% Utilities & Telephone 4,205 6,922 6,705 8,249 8,249 15,249 7,000 85% Materials & Supplies 12,749 56,468 10,345 22,690 22,690 13,690 (9,000) -40% Contracts & Services 32,040 51,938 68,960 83,651 83,651 94,255 10,604 13% Employee Support 4,986 821 1,855 4,930 4,930 5,930 1,000 20% Grants/Contributions to Others - - - - - - -
Other Operating Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal 199,852 261,071 235,191 311,427 311,427 371,116 59,689 19% Capital Uses
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Equipment - - - - - - -
Capital Improvements - - - - - - -
Loss on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Financing Uses
Debt Principal Repaid - - - - - - -
Debt Interest Paid - - - - - - -
Other Financing Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Uses
Interfund Transfers Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Loans Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Used - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Extraordinary Items
Extraordinary Item - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL USES 199,852 261,071 235,191 311,427 311,427 371,116 59,689 19% NET - 44 (44) - - - -
FUND BALANCE - 44 - - - - -
WORKING CAPITAL BALANCE - 44 - - - - -
* DRAFT * 60
City of Crescent City FY 2022-23 Budget
Fund: 506 Building Maintenance Fund
Dept: 506 Building Maintenance
FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Var Var Actual Actual Actual Budget Estimated Proposed $ %
Operating Sources
Taxes - - - - - - -
Special Assessments - - - - - - -
Licenses & Permits - - - - - - -
Fines & Penalties - - - - - - -
Other Operating Sources - - - - - - -
Operating Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Charges for Services - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Financing Sources
Interest Income - - - - - - -
Debt Proceeds - - - - - - -
Other Financing Sources - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Capital Sources
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Gain on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Sources
Interfund Transfers In - - 21 7,500 - 7,500 7,500
Interfund Loans In - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Provided 149,579 187,699 141,863 183,172 183,172 258,670 75,498 41% Subtotal 149,579 187,699 141,884 190,672 183,172 266,170 82,998 45% TOTAL SOURCES 149,579 187,699 141,884 190,672 183,172 266,170 82,998 45% Operating Uses
Wages & Salaries 77,464 80,559 85,972 76,927 76,927 96,857 19,930 26% Employee Benefits 46,073 49,879 42,933 44,027 44,027 53,185 9,158 21% Utilities & Telephone 4,228 5,172 5,186 5,428 5,428 5,428 - 0% Materials & Supplies 17,513 11,879 6,716 16,400 8,900 17,400 8,500 96% Contracts & Services 4,303 40,310 1,077 47,890 47,890 93,300 45,410 95% Employee Support - - - - - - -
Grants/Contributions to Others - - - - - - -
Other Operating Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal 149,581 187,799 141,884 190,672 183,172 266,170 82,998 45% Capital Uses
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Equipment - - - - - - -
Capital Improvements - - - - - - -
Loss on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Financing Uses
Debt Principal Repaid - - - - - - -
Debt Interest Paid - - - - - - -
Other Financing Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Uses
Interfund Transfers Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Loans Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Used - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Extraordinary Items
Extraordinary Item - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL USES 149,581 187,799 141,884 190,672 183,172 266,170 82,998 45% NET (2) (100) - - - - -
FUND BALANCE 100 - - - - - -
WORKING CAPITAL BALANCE - - - - - - -
* DRAFT * 61
City of Crescent City FY 2022-23 Budget
Fund: 508 Equipment Fund
Dept: 508 Equipment
FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Var Var Actual Actual Actual Budget Estimated Proposed $ %
Operating Sources
Taxes - - - - - - -
Special Assessments - - - - - - -
Licenses & Permits - - - - - - -
Fines & Penalties - - - - - - -
Other Operating Sources - - - - - - -
Operating Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Charges for Services 7,202 9,465 14,792 9,000 9,000 9,000 - 0% Subtotal 7,202 9,465 14,792 9,000 9,000 9,000 - 0%
Financing Sources
Interest Income 1,174 1,254 76 - - - -
Debt Proceeds - - - - - - -
Other Financing Sources - - - - - - -
Subtotal 1,174 1,254 76 - - - -
Capital Sources
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Gain on Sale of Assets - - 7,721 - - 30,000 30,000
Subtotal - - 7,721 - - 30,000 30,000
Internal Sources
Interfund Transfers In - 282 36,443 210,000 210,000 260,000 50,000 24% Interfund Loans In - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Provided 285,417 318,579 327,474 342,406 342,406 313,343 (29,063) -8% Subtotal 285,417 318,861 363,917 552,406 552,406 573,343 20,937 4% TOTAL SOURCES 293,793 329,580 386,506 561,406 561,406 612,343 50,937 9% Operating Uses
Wages & Salaries 97,525 120,184 122,801 126,987 126,987 129,619 2,632 2% Employee Benefits 73,136 72,576 77,263 82,003 82,003 80,608 (1,395) -2% Utilities & Telephone 14,421 14,945 13,416 15,891 15,891 13,891 (2,000) -13% Materials & Supplies 101,807 89,742 91,625 121,100 121,100 121,100 - 0% Contracts & Services 2,367 2,534 1,504 1,325 1,325 3,025 1,700 128% Employee Support 1,767 217 60 4,100 4,100 4,100 - 0%
Grants/Contributions to Others - - - - - - -
Other Operating Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal 291,023 300,198 306,669 351,406 351,406 352,343 937 0% Capital Uses
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Equipment - 35,413 63,063 210,000 210,000 260,000 50,000 24% Capital Improvements - - - - - - -
Loss on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - 35,413 63,063 210,000 210,000 260,000 50,000 24% Financing Uses
Debt Principal Repaid - - - - - - -
Debt Interest Paid - - - - - - -
Other Financing Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Uses
Interfund Transfers Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Loans Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Used - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Extraordinary Items
Extraordinary Item - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL USES 291,023 335,611 369,732 561,406 561,406 612,343 50,937 9% NET 2,770 (6,031) 16,774 - - - -
FUND BALANCE 1,117,032 1,042,217 1,019,469 1,019,469 1,019,469 1,019,469 - 0% WORKING CAPITAL BALANCE 80,772 74,741 91,515 91,515 91,515 91,515 - 0% Depreciation expense is not included in current year budget / estimated or upcoming year proposed columns * DRAFT * 62
City of Crescent City FY 2022-23 Budget
Fund: 620 Insurance Services Fund
Dept: 620 Insurance
FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Var Var Actual Actual Actual Budget Estimated Proposed $ %
Operating Sources
Taxes - - - - - - -
Special Assessments - - - - - - -
Licenses & Permits - - - - - - -
Fines & Penalties - - - - - - -
Other Operating Sources 58,343 66,650 65,440 - 58,884 - (58,884) -100% Operating Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Charges for Services - - - - - - -
Subtotal 58,343 66,650 65,440 - 58,884 - (58,884) -100% Financing Sources
Interest Income 542 734 333 - - - -
Debt Proceeds - - - - - - -
Other Financing Sources - - - - - - -
Subtotal 542 734 333 - - - -
Capital Sources
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Gain on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Sources
Interfund Transfers In - - - - - - -
Interfund Loans In - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Provided 238,779 249,239 289,446 326,367 326,367 374,191 47,824 15% Subtotal 238,779 249,239 289,446 326,367 326,367 374,191 47,824 15% TOTAL SOURCES 297,664 316,623 355,219 326,367 385,251 374,191 (11,060) -3% Operating Uses
Wages & Salaries - - - - - - -
Employee Benefits - - - - - - -
Utilities & Telephone - - - - - - -
Materials & Supplies - - - - - - -
Contracts & Services 238,779 249,239 289,446 326,367 326,367 374,191 47,824 15% Employee Support - - - - - - -
Grants/Contributions to Others - - - - - - -
Other Operating Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal 238,779 249,239 289,446 326,367 326,367 374,191 47,824 15% Capital Uses
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Equipment - - - - - - -
Capital Improvements - - - - - - -
Loss on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Financing Uses
Debt Principal Repaid - - - - - - -
Debt Interest Paid - - - - - - -
Other Financing Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Uses
Interfund Transfers Out - 22,703 21,882 153,093 141,593 53,100 (88,493) -62% Interfund Loans Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Used - - - - - - -
Subtotal - 22,703 21,882 153,093 141,593 53,100 (88,493) -62% Extraordinary Items
Extraordinary Item - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL USES 238,779 271,942 311,328 479,460 467,960 427,291 (40,669) -9% NET 58,885 44,681 43,891 (153,093) (82,709) (53,100) 29,609 -36% FUND BALANCE 104,939 149,620 193,511 40,418 110,802 57,702 (53,100) -48% WORKING CAPITAL BALANCE 104,939 149,620 193,511 40,418 110,802 57,702 (53,100) -48% * DRAFT * 63
City of Crescent City FY 2022-23 Budget
Fund: 630 Other Post Employment Benefits Trust
Dept: n/a All Cost Centers Combined
FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Var Var Actual Actual Actual Budget Estimated Proposed $ %
Operating Sources
Taxes - - - - - - -
Special Assessments - - - - - - -
Licenses & Permits - - - - - - -
Fines & Penalties - - - - - - -
Other Operating Sources - - - - - - -
Operating Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Charges for Services - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Financing Sources
Interest Income 473 324 105 - - - -
Debt Proceeds - - - - - - -
Other Financing Sources - - - - - - -
Subtotal 473 324 105 - - - -
Capital Sources
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Gain on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Sources
Interfund Transfers In - - - - - - -
Interfund Loans In - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Provided 159,638 164,738 140,308 144,237 144,237 144,237 - 0% Subtotal 159,638 164,738 140,308 144,237 144,237 144,237 - 0% TOTAL SOURCES 160,111 165,062 140,413 144,237 144,237 144,237 - 0% Operating Uses
Wages & Salaries - - - - - - -
Employee Benefits 156,511 161,094 136,471 140,237 140,237 140,237 - 0% Utilities & Telephone - - - - - - -
Materials & Supplies - - - - - - -
Contracts & Services 3,600 3,968 3,942 4,000 4,000 4,000 - 0% Employee Support - - - - - - -
Grants/Contributions to Others - - - - - - -
Other Operating Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal 160,111 165,062 140,413 144,237 144,237 144,237 - 0% Capital Uses
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Equipment - - - - - - -
Capital Improvements - - - - - - -
Loss on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Financing Uses
Debt Principal Repaid - - - - - - -
Debt Interest Paid - - - - - - -
Other Financing Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Uses
Interfund Transfers Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Loans Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Used - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Extraordinary Items
Extraordinary Item - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL USES 160,111 165,062 140,413 144,237 144,237 144,237 - 0%
NET - - - - - - -
FUND BALANCE - - - - - - -
WORKING CAPITAL BALANCE - - - - - - -
* DRAFT * 64
General
Capital Improvements
and
Public Safety
Vehicle Replacements
* DRAFT * 65
City of Crescent City FY 2022-23 Budget
Fund: 901 Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) Fund
Dept: n/a CIP Fund - All Cost Centers Combined
FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Var Var Actual Actual Actual Budget Estimated Proposed $ %
Operating Sources
Taxes - - - - - - -
Special Assessments - - - - - - -
Licenses & Permits - - - - - - -
Fines & Penalties - - - - - - -
Other Operating Sources - - - - - - -
Operating Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Charges for Services - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Financing Sources
Interest Income 224 4,153 (1,695) - - - -
Debt Proceeds - - - - - - -
Other Financing Sources - - - - - - -
Subtotal 224 4,153 (1,695) - - - -
Capital Sources
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Grants/Contributions 225,633 60,414 829,427 6,127,726 660,687 6,127,456 5,466,769 827% Gain on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal 225,633 60,414 829,427 6,127,726 660,687 6,127,456 5,466,769 827% Internal Sources
Interfund Transfers In - 679,738 14,217 1,530,266 1,530,266 2,405,425 875,159 57% Interfund Loans In - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Provided - - - - - - -
Subtotal - 679,738 14,217 1,530,266 1,530,266 2,405,425 875,159 57% TOTAL SOURCES 225,857 744,305 841,949 7,657,992 2,190,953 8,532,881 6,341,928 289% Operating Uses
Wages & Salaries - - - - - - -
Employee Benefits - - - - - - -
Utilities & Telephone - - - - - - -
Materials & Supplies - - - - - - -
Contracts & Services - - - - - - -
Employee Support - - - - - - -
Grants/Contributions to Others - - - - - - -
Other Operating Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Capital Uses
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Equipment - - - - - - -
Capital Improvements 76,403 343,009 1,223,435 7,304,305 117,016 9,980,879 9,863,863 8429% Loss on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal 76,403 343,009 1,223,435 7,304,305 117,016 9,980,879 9,863,863 8429% Financing Uses
Debt Principal Repaid - - - - - - -
Debt Interest Paid - - - - - - -
Other Financing Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Uses
Interfund Transfers Out - - 651,738 - - - -
Interfund Loans Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Used - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - 651,738 - - - -
Extraordinary Items
Extraordinary Item - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL USES 76,403 343,009 1,875,173 7,304,305 117,016 9,980,879 9,863,863 8429% NET 149,454 401,296 (1,033,224) 353,687 2,073,937 (1,447,998) (3,521,935) -170% FUND BALANCE 50,501 451,797 (581,427) (227,740) 1,492,510 44,512 (1,447,998) -97% * DRAFT * 66
City of Crescent City FY 2022-23 Budget
Fund: 901 General Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) Fund Dept: n/a All Cost Centers Combined
Summary of General CIP Projects
Capital projects often take place over more than one fiscal year. The project is budgeted when funded and approved, and the unspent budget amount carries forward until the project is complete. The following shows planned projects and their estimated budget amounts for this fiscal year. For projects that began in a prior year, the amount shown below is the estimated amount remaining.
Project Funding Source(s) Estimated Budget FY 22-23
Pebble Beach Bank Stabilization (design) Federal Highways, Local Transportation Commission, City Gen Fund 440,611 City Hall (design) City Gen Fund 155,794
Police Department facility improvements (design) City Gen Fund, Measure S 125,000 Fire Hall facility improvements (security, acoustics) City Gen Fund, Measure S 39,531 Fire Hall facility improvements (drainage) Measure S 10,000 Pool HVAC / dehumidification Measure S, ARPA 1,186,391
Front Street (between G Street and I Street) City Gen Fund, Measure S, ARPA, Local Transportation Commission 2,200,000 Beachfront Park improvements Prop 68 5,177,952
Pool locker room flooring Measure S 130,000
Street preservation project Measure S 500,000
Peterson Park fence City Gen Fund, insurance 15,600
9,980,879
* DRAFT * 67
City of Crescent City FY 2022-23 Budget
Fund: 902 Beachfront Park Donations
Dept: 470 Parks
FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Var Var Actual Actual Actual Budget Estimated Proposed $ %
Operating Sources
Taxes - - - - - - -
Special Assessments - - - - - - -
Licenses & Permits - - - - - - -
Fines & Penalties - - - - - - -
Other Operating Sources - - - - - - -
Operating Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Charges for Services - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Financing Sources
Interest Income 19 25 5 - - - -
Debt Proceeds - - - - - - -
Other Financing Sources - - - - - - -
Subtotal 19 25 5 - - - -
Capital Sources
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Gain on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Sources
Interfund Transfers In 9,083 - - - - - -
Interfund Loans In - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Provided - - - - - - -
Subtotal 9,083 - - - - - -
TOTAL SOURCES 9,102 25 5 - - - -
Operating Uses
Wages & Salaries - - - - - - -
Employee Benefits - - - - - - -
Utilities & Telephone - - - - - - -
Materials & Supplies - - - - - - -
Contracts & Services - - - - - - -
Employee Support - - - - - - -
Grants/Contributions to Others - - - - - - -
Other Operating Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Capital Uses
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Equipment - - - - - - -
Capital Improvements 4,650 353 - - - - -
Loss on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal 4,650 353 - - - - -
Financing Uses
Debt Principal Repaid - - - - - - -
Debt Interest Paid - - - - - - -
Other Financing Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Uses
Interfund Transfers Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Loans Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Used - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Extraordinary Items
Extraordinary Item - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL USES 4,650 353 - - - - -
NET 4,452 (328) 5 - - - -
FUND BALANCE 1,392 1,065 1,070 1,070 1,070 1,070 - 0%
* DRAFT * 68
City of Crescent City FY 2022-23 Budget
Fund: 930 Fire Vehicle Replacement Fund
Dept: 230 Fire
FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Var Var Actual Actual Actual Budget Estimated Proposed $ %
Operating Sources
Taxes - - - - - - -
Special Assessments - - - - - - -
Licenses & Permits - - - - - - -
Fines & Penalties - - - - - - -
Other Operating Sources - - - - - - -
Operating Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Charges for Services - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Financing Sources
Interest Income 1,009 1,249 (9) - - - -
Debt Proceeds - - - - - - -
Other Financing Sources - - - - - - -
Subtotal 1,009 1,249 (9) - - - -
Capital Sources
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Grants/Contributions 16,455 - - - - - -
Gain on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal 16,455 - - - - - -
Internal Sources
Interfund Transfers In - - - 98,000 98,000 38,000 (60,000) -61% Interfund Loans In - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Provided - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - 98,000 98,000 38,000 (60,000) -61%
TOTAL SOURCES 17,464 1,249 (9) 98,000 98,000 38,000 (60,000) -61% Operating Uses
Wages & Salaries - - - - - - -
Employee Benefits - - - - - - -
Utilities & Telephone - - - - - - -
Materials & Supplies - - - - - - -
Contracts & Services - - - - - - -
Employee Support - - - - - - -
Grants/Contributions to Others - - - - - - -
Other Operating Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Capital Uses
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Equipment 33,160 - - - - - -
Capital Improvements - - - - - - -
Loss on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal 33,160 - - - - - -
Financing Uses
Debt Principal Repaid - - - - - - -
Debt Interest Paid - - - - - - -
Other Financing Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Uses
Interfund Transfers Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Loans Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Used - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Extraordinary Items
Extraordinary Item - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL USES 33,160 - - - - - -
NET (15,696) 1,249 (9) 98,000 98,000 38,000 (60,000) -61% FUND BALANCE 53,457 54,706 54,697 152,697 152,697 190,697 38,000 25% * DRAFT * 69
City of Crescent City FY 2022-23 Budget
Fund: 940 Police Vehicle Replacement Fund
Dept: 240 Police
FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Var Var Actual Actual Actual Budget Estimated Proposed $ %
Operating Sources
Taxes - - - - - - -
Special Assessments - - - - - - -
Licenses & Permits - - - - - - -
Fines & Penalties - - - - - - -
Other Operating Sources - - - - - - -
Operating Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Charges for Services - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Financing Sources
Interest Income 376 422 (3) - - - -
Debt Proceeds - - - - - - -
Other Financing Sources - - - - - - -
Subtotal 376 422 (3) - - - -
Capital Sources
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Gain on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Sources
Interfund Transfers In - - - 115,000 115,000 120,000 5,000 4% Interfund Loans In - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Provided - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - 115,000 115,000 120,000 5,000 4%
TOTAL SOURCES 376 422 (3) 115,000 115,000 120,000 5,000 4% Operating Uses
Wages & Salaries - - - - - - -
Employee Benefits - - - - - - -
Utilities & Telephone - - - - - - -
Materials & Supplies - - - - - - -
Contracts & Services - - - - - - -
Employee Support - - - - - - -
Grants/Contributions to Others - - - - - - -
Other Operating Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Capital Uses
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Equipment - - - 133,300 133,297 120,000 (13,297) -10% Capital Improvements - - - - - - -
Loss on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - 133,300 133,297 120,000 (13,297) -10%
Financing Uses
Debt Principal Repaid - - - - - - -
Debt Interest Paid - - - - - - -
Other Financing Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Uses
Interfund Transfers Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Loans Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Used - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Extraordinary Items
Extraordinary Item - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL USES - - - 133,300 133,297 120,000 (13,297) -10%
NET 376 422 (3) (18,300) (18,297) - 18,297 -100%
FUND BALANCE 17,879 18,300 18,297 (3) - - -
* DRAFT * 70
Fiduciary
Funds
* DRAFT * 71
City of Crescent City FY 2022-23 Budget
Fund: 991 RDA Successor Agency
Dept: n/a All Cost Centers Combined
FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Var Var Actual Actual Actual Budget Estimated Proposed $ %
Operating Sources
Taxes 19,263 28,098 21,396 - - 87,000 87,000
Special Assessments - - - - - - -
Licenses & Permits - - - - - - -
Fines & Penalties - - - - - - -
Other Operating Sources - - - - - - -
Operating Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Charges for Services - - - - - - -
Subtotal 19,263 28,098 21,396 - - 87,000 87,000
Financing Sources
Interest Income 4,437 2,361 11 - - - -
Debt Proceeds - - - - - - -
Other Financing Sources - - - - - - -
Subtotal 4,437 2,361 11 - - - -
Capital Sources
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Grants/Contributions - - - - - - -
Gain on Sale of Assets - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Internal Sources
Interfund Transfers In - - - - - - -
Interfund Loans In - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Provided - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL SOURCES 23,700 30,459 21,407 - - 87,000 87,000
Operating Uses
Wages & Salaries - 1,044 1,027 1,985 1,985 - (1,985) -100% Employee Benefits - 513 374 839 839 - (839) -100%
Utilities & Telephone - - - - - - -
Materials & Supplies - - - - - - -
Contracts & Services - 1,570 1,026 2,176 2,176 - (2,176) -100% Employee Support - - - - - - -
Grants/Contributions to Others - - - - - - -
Other Operating Uses - 34,517 - - - - -
Subtotal - 37,644 2,427 5,000 5,000 - (5,000) -100%
Capital Uses
Capital Leases/Rentals - - - - - - -
Capital Equipment - - - - - - -
Capital Improvements - - - - - - -
Loss on Sale of Assets 16,200 16,783 - - - - -
Subtotal 16,200 16,783 - - - - -
Financing Uses
Debt Principal Repaid 103,056 41,334 16,396 24,000 24,000 150,000 126,000 525% Debt Interest Paid - - - - - - -
Other Financing Uses - - - - - - -
Subtotal 103,056 41,334 16,396 24,000 24,000 150,000 126,000 525% Internal Uses
Interfund Transfers Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Loans Out - - - - - - -
Interfund Services Used - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
Extraordinary Items
Extraordinary Item - - - - - - -
Subtotal - - - - - - -
TOTAL USES 119,256 95,761 18,823 29,000 29,000 150,000 121,000 417% NET (95,556) (65,302) 2,584 (29,000) (29,000) (63,000) (34,000) 117% FUND BALANCE (598,838) (622,806) (603,826) (608,826) (608,826) (521,826) 87,000 -14% * DRAFT * 72
Cost
Allocations
* DRAFT * 73
City of Crescent City
City Council and City Clerk
FY22-23 Allocation
Fund Dept Project Cost Center
Budgeted
Wages &
Benefits Dept %
Fund
Share Allocation
001 110 Council 115,494 2.2% 2,023
001 111 Administration 64,356 1.2% 1,127
001 112 Econ Dev / Comm Supp / Grants 106,668 2.0% 1,868 001 113 City Clerk 121,822 2.3% 2,133
001 114 Human Resources 119,382 2.3% 2,091
001 120 Finance 212,023 4.0% 3,713
001 130 Attorney 64,271 1.2% 1,126
001 230 Fire 927,020 17.5% 16,235
001 240 Police 2,188,810 41.4% 38,332
001 250 Code Enforcement 40,452 0.8% 708
001 251 Building Inspection 41,965 0.8% 735
001 313 Planning 66,649 1.3% 1,167
001 350 Public Works Admin 90,773 1.7% 1,590
001 364 Streets 35,409 0.7% 620
001 364 10023 Street Lights 46,644 0.9% 817
001 364 10024 Street Sweeping 18,236 0.3% 319
001 364 10025 Street Maintenance 173,918 3.3% 3,046
001 470 Parks 275,272 5.2% 4,821
001 471 Cultural Center 51,188 1.0% 896
001 480 Pool 529,940 10.0% 9,281
General Fund Total 5,290,292 32.0% 92,648
110 Housing Authority 473,167 0.0% -
412 RV Park 209,522 4.0% 11,581
413 111 Administration 75,016 6.9% 6,380
413 112 Econ Dev / Grants 37,155 3.4% 3,160
413 120 Finance 226,558 20.8% 19,269
413 130 Attorney 38,659 3.5% 3,288
413 351 Sewer Lab 252,833 23.2% 21,504
413 352 WWTP Operations 122,807 11.3% 10,445
413 353 Collection System 98,973 9.1% 8,418
413 353 35019 City Lift Stations 40,230 3.7% 3,422
413 356 35020 Oregon Lift Station 5,866 0.5% 499
413 356 35022 CSA Lift Stations 89,497 8.2% 7,612
413 357 WWTP Maintenance 101,719 9.3% 8,651
Sewer Fund Total 1,089,313 32.0% 92,648
419 111 Administration 74,057 6.8% 6,294
419 112 Econ Dev / Grants 33,617 3.1% 2,857
419 120 Finance 204,895 18.8% 17,414
419 130 Attorney 34,634 3.2% 2,944
419 371 Water Operations & Maint. 706,211 64.8% 60,022
419 372 41028 Bertsch Oceanview 26,688 2.4% 2,268
419 372 41029 Churchtree 4,988 0.5% 424
419 372 41030 Meadowbrook 4,988 0.5% 424
Water Fund Total 1,090,078 32.0% 92,647
City Council Expenses 141,328
Less ISF (5,939)
City Clerk Expenses 160,398
Less ISF (6,264)
Less Reimbursed Expenses
Total Expenses to Allocate 289,523
Less General Fund Share 92,648
Total to Allocate to Other Funds 196,875
* DRAFT * 74
City of Crescent City
Information Technology
FY22-23 Allocation
Fund Dept Project Cost Center
Budgeted
Wages &
Benefits Dept %
Fund
Share Allocation
001 110 Council 115,494 2.2% 2,161
001 111 Administration 64,356 1.2% 1,204
001 112 Econ Dev / Comm Supp / Grants 106,668 2.0% 1,996 001 113 City Clerk 121,822 2.3% 2,279
001 114 Human Resources 119,382 2.3% 2,234
001 120 Finance 212,023 4.0% 3,967
001 130 Attorney 64,271 1.2% 1,203
001 230 Fire 927,020 17.5% 17,345
001 240 Police 2,188,810 41.4% 40,955
001 250 Code Enforcement 40,452 0.8% 757
001 251 Building Inspection 41,965 0.8% 785
001 313 Planning 66,649 1.3% 1,247
001 350 Public Works Admin 90,773 1.7% 1,698
001 364 Streets 35,409 0.7% 663
001 364 10023 Street Lights 46,644 0.9% 873
001 364 10024 Street Sweeping 18,236 0.3% 341
001 364 10025 Street Maintenance 173,918 3.3% 3,254
001 470 Parks 275,272 5.2% 5,151
001 471 Cultural Center 51,188 1.0% 958
001 480 Pool 529,940 10.0% 9,916
General Fund Total 5,290,292 27.0% 98,987
110 Housing Authority 473,167 2.0% 7,332
412 RV Park 209,522 5.0% 18,331
413 111 Administration 75,016 6.9% 8,332
413 112 Econ Dev / Grants 37,155 3.4% 4,127
413 120 Finance 226,558 20.8% 25,162
413 130 Attorney 38,659 3.5% 4,294
413 351 Sewer Lab 252,833 23.2% 28,081
413 352 WWTP Operations 122,807 11.3% 13,639
413 353 Collection System 98,973 9.1% 10,992
413 353 35019 City Lift Stations 40,230 3.7% 4,468
413 356 35020 Oregon Lift Station 5,866 0.5% 652
413 356 35022 CSA Lift Stations 89,497 8.2% 9,940
413 357 WWTP Maintenance 101,719 9.3% 11,297
Sewer Fund Total 1,089,313 33.0% 120,984
419 111 Administration 74,057 6.8% 8,219
419 112 Econ Dev / Grants 33,617 3.1% 3,731
419 120 Finance 204,895 18.8% 22,740
419 130 Attorney 34,634 3.2% 3,844
419 371 Water Operations & Maint. 706,211 64.8% 78,380
419 372 41028 Bertsch Oceanview 26,688 2.4% 2,962
419 372 41029 Churchtree 4,988 0.5% 554
419 372 41030 Meadowbrook 4,988 0.5% 554
Water Fund Total 1,090,078 33.0% 120,984
ISF Expenses 366,616
* DRAFT * 75
City of Crescent City
Building Maintenance
FY22-23 Allocation
Fund Dept Project Cost Center
Budgeted
Wages &
Benefits Dept %
Fund
Share Allocation
001 110 Council 115,494 2.2% 1,584
001 111 Administration 64,356 1.2% 864
001 112 Econ Dev / Comm Supp / Grants 106,668 2.0% 1,440 001 113 City Clerk 121,822 2.3% 1,656
001 114 Human Resources 119,382 2.3% 1,656
001 120 Finance 212,023 4.0% 2,880
001 130 Attorney 64,271 1.2% 864
001 230 Fire 927,020 17.5% 12,601
001 240 Police 2,188,810 41.4% 29,811
001 250 Code Enforcement 40,452 0.8% 576
001 251 Building Inspection 41,965 0.8% 576
001 313 Planning 66,649 1.3% 936
001 350 Public Works Admin 90,773 1.7% 1,224
001 364 Streets 35,409 0.7% 504
001 364 10023 Street Lights 46,644 0.9% 648
001 364 10024 Street Sweeping 18,236 0.3% 216
001 364 10025 Street Maintenance 173,918 3.3% 2,376
001 470 Parks 275,272 5.2% 3,744
001 471 Cultural Center 51,188 1.0% 720
001 480 Pool 529,940 10.0% 7,201
General Fund Total 5,290,292 28.0% 72,077
110 Housing Authority 473,167 1% labor 1,500
412 RV Park 209,522 5.0% 12,859
413 111 Administration 75,016 6.9% 5,944
413 112 Econ Dev / Grants 37,155 3.4% 2,929
413 120 Finance 226,558 20.8% 17,920
413 130 Attorney 38,659 3.5% 3,015
413 351 Sewer Lab 252,833 23.2% 19,987
413 352 WWTP Operations 122,807 11.3% 9,735
413 353 Collection System 98,973 9.1% 7,840
413 353 35019 City Lift Stations 40,230 3.7% 3,188
413 356 35020 Oregon Lift Station 5,866 0.5% 431
413 356 35022 CSA Lift Stations 89,497 8.2% 7,064
413 357 WWTP Maintenance 101,719 9.3% 8,012
Sewer Fund Total 1,089,313 33.5% 86,065
419 111 Administration 74,057 6.8% 5,858
419 112 Econ Dev / Grants 33,617 3.1% 2,671
419 120 Finance 204,895 18.8% 16,197
419 130 Attorney 34,634 3.2% 2,757
419 371 Water Operations & Maint. 706,211 64.8% 55,826
419 372 41028 Bertsch Oceanview 26,688 2.4% 2,068
419 372 41029 Churchtree 4,988 0.5% 431
419 372 41030 Meadowbrook 4,988 0.5% 431
Water Fund Total 1,090,078 33.5% 86,239
ISF Expenses (less other revenue) 258,670
Housing share (1% labor only) 1,500
To allocate to other funds 257,170
* DRAFT * 76
City of Crescent City
Equipment
FY22-23 Allocation
Fund Dept Project Cost Center Units %
Base
Allocation
Fuel
Allocation
Parts
Allocation
Total
Allocation
001 110 Council - 0.0% - - - -
001 111 Administration 0.90 0.8% 1,871 565 334 2,770
001 112 Econ Dev / Comm Supp / Grants - 0.0% - - - -
001 113 City Clerk - 0.0% - - - -
001 114 Human Resources - 0.0% - - - -
001 120 Finance - 0.0% - - - -
001 130 Attorney - 0.0% - - - -
001 230 Fire 17.00 15.7% 36,713 - - 36,713
001 240 Police 11.00 10.2% 23,852 - - 23,852
001 250 Code Enforcement - 0.0% - - - -
001 251 Building Inspection - 0.0% - - - -
001 313 Planning - 0.0% - - - -
001 350 Public Works Admin - 0.0% - - - -
001 364 Streets - 0.0% - - - -
001 364 10023 Street Lights - 0.0% - - - -
001 364 10024 Street Sweeping - 0.0% - - - -
001 364 10025 Street Maintenance 16.73 15.5% 36,246 10,509 6,200 52,955 001 470 Parks 12.70 11.7% 27,360 7,977 4,707 40,044
001 471 Cultural Center - 0.0% - - - -
001 480 Pool - 0.0% - - - -
General Fund Total 58.33 126,042 19,051 11,241 156,334
110 Housing Authority 0.50 0.5% 1,169 - - 1,169
412 RV Park 0.80 0.7% 1,637 503 296 2,436
413 111 Administration - 0.0% - - - -
413 112 Econ Dev / Grants - 0.0% - - - -
413 120 Finance - 0.0% - - - -
413 130 Attorney - 0.0% - - - -
413 351 Sewer Lab - 0.0% - - - -
413 352 WWTP Operations 2.00 1.9% 4,443 1,256 741 6,440 413 353 Collection System 17.33 16.0% 37,415 10,886 6,423 54,724 413 353 35019 City Lift Stations - 0.0% - - - -
413 356 35020 Oregon Lift Station - 0.0% - - - -
413 356 35022 CSA Lift Stations - 0.0% - - - -
413 357 WWTP Maintenance - 0.0% - - - -
Sewer Fund Total 19.33 41,858 12,142 7,164 61,164
419 111 Administration - 0.0% - - - -
419 112 Econ Dev / Grants - 0.0% - - - -
419 120 Finance - 0.0% - - - -
419 130 Attorney - 0.0% - - - -
419 371 Water Operations & Maint. 29.14 27.0% 63,138 18,304 10,799 92,241 419 372 41028 Bertsch Oceanview - 0.0% - - - -
419 372 41029 Churchtree - 0.0% - - - -
419 372 41030 Meadowbrook - 0.0% - - - -
Water Fund Total 29.14 63,138 18,304 10,799 92,241
Total Units 108.10
Total Fund Expenses 612,343
Vehicle replacements - funded by transfers in from the funds to benefit 260,000 External revenue 39,000
ISF to allocate 313,343
Fuel 50,000
Parts 29,500
Other 233,843
313,343
* DRAFT * 77
City of Crescent City
Insurance
FY22-23 Allocation
Fund Dept Project Cost Center
Budgeted
Wages &
Benefits Dept % Fund Share Allocation
001 110 Council 115,494 2.2% 2,206
001 111 Administration 64,356 1.2% 1,229
001 112 Econ Dev / Comm Supp / Grants 106,668 2.0% 2,037 001 113 City Clerk 121,822 2.3% 2,327
001 114 Human Resources 119,382 2.3% 2,280
001 120 Finance 212,023 4.0% 4,049
001 130 Attorney 64,271 1.2% 1,227
001 230 Fire 927,020 17.5% 17,704
001 240 Police 2,188,810 41.4% 41,801
001 250 Code Enforcement 40,452 0.8% 773
001 251 Building Inspection 41,965 0.8% 801
001 313 Planning 66,649 1.3% 1,273
001 350 Public Works Admin 90,773 1.7% 1,734
001 364 Streets 35,409 0.7% 676
001 364 10023 Street Lights 46,644 0.9% 891
001 364 10024 Street Sweeping 18,236 0.3% 348
001 364 10025 Street Maintenance 173,918 3.3% 3,321
001 470 Parks 275,272 5.2% 5,257
001 471 Cultural Center 51,188 1.0% 978
001 480 Pool 529,940 10.0% 10,121
General Fund Total 5,290,292 27.0% 101,033
110 Housing Authority 447,704 2.0% 7,484
412 RV Park 144,674 5.0% 18,710
413 111 Administration 75,016 6.9% 8,504
413 112 Econ Dev / Grants 37,155 3.4% 4,212
413 120 Finance 226,558 20.8% 25,682
413 130 Attorney 38,659 3.5% 4,382
413 351 Sewer Lab 252,833 23.2% 28,661
413 352 WWTP Operations 122,807 11.3% 13,921
413 353 Collection System 98,973 9.1% 11,219
413 353 35019 City Lift Stations 40,230 3.7% 4,560
413 356 35020 Oregon Lift Station 5,866 0.5% 665
413 356 35022 CSA Lift Stations 89,497 8.2% 10,145
413 357 WWTP Maintenance 101,719 9.3% 11,531
Sewer Fund Total 1,089,313 33.0% 123,482
419 111 Administration 74,057 6.8% 8,389
419 112 Econ Dev / Grants 33,617 3.1% 3,808
419 120 Finance 204,895 18.8% 23,210
419 130 Attorney 34,634 3.2% 3,923
419 371 Water Operations & Maint. 706,211 64.8% 79,999
419 372 41028 Bertsch Oceanview 26,688 2.4% 3,023
419 372 41029 Churchtree 4,988 0.5% 565
419 372 41030 Meadowbrook 4,988 0.5% 565
Water Fund Total 1,090,078 33.0% 123,482
ISF Expenses 374,191
* DRAFT * 78
City of Crescent City
Human Resources & Safety
FY22-23 Allocation
Fund Dept Project Cost Center
Budgeted
Wages &
Benefits Dept %
Fund
Share Allocation
001 110 Council 115,494 2.2% 2,039
001 111 Administration 64,356 1.2% 1,136
001 112 Econ Dev / Comm Supp / Grants 106,668 2.0% 1,884 001 113 City Clerk 121,822 2.3% 2,151
001 114 Human Resources 119,382 2.3% 2,108
001 120 Finance 212,023 4.0% 3,744
001 130 Attorney 64,271 1.2% 1,135
001 230 Fire 927,020 17.5% 16,370
001 240 Police 2,188,810 41.4% 38,651
001 250 Code Enforcement 40,452 0.8% 714
001 251 Building Inspection 41,965 0.8% 741
001 313 Planning 66,649 1.3% 1,177
001 350 Public Works Admin 90,773 1.7% 1,603
001 364 Streets 35,409 0.7% 625
001 364 10023 Street Lights 46,644 0.9% 824
001 364 10024 Street Sweeping 18,236 0.3% 322
001 364 10025 Street Maintenance 173,918 3.3% 3,071
001 470 Parks 275,272 5.2% 4,861
001 471 Cultural Center 51,188 1.0% 904
001 480 Pool 529,940 10.0% 9,358
General Fund Total 5,290,292 70.7% 93,418
110 Housing Authority 473,167 5.4% 7,172
412 RV Park 209,522 2.8% 3,733
413 111 Administration 75,016 6.9% 890
413 112 Econ Dev / Grants 37,155 3.4% 441
413 120 Finance 226,558 20.8% 2,687
413 130 Attorney 38,659 3.5% 458
413 351 Sewer Lab 252,833 23.2% 2,999
413 352 WWTP Operations 122,807 11.3% 1,456
413 353 Collection System 98,973 9.1% 1,174
413 353 35019 City Lift Stations 40,230 3.7% 477
413 356 35020 Oregon Lift Station 5,866 0.5% 70
413 356 35022 CSA Lift Stations 89,497 8.2% 1,061
413 357 WWTP Maintenance 101,719 9.3% 1,206
Sewer Fund Total 1,089,313 9.8% 12,919
419 111 Administration 74,057 6.8% 1,011
419 112 Econ Dev / Grants 33,617 3.1% 459
419 120 Finance 204,895 18.8% 2,796
419 130 Attorney 34,634 3.2% 473
419 371 Water Operations & Maint. 706,211 64.8% 9,637
419 372 41028 Bertsch Oceanview 26,688 2.4% 364
419 372 41029 Churchtree 4,988 0.5% 68
419 372 41030 Meadowbrook 4,988 0.5% 68
Water Fund Total 1,090,078 11.3% 14,876
HR Expenses 140,857
Less ISF (6,139)
Less Reimbursed Expenses (2,600)
Total Expenses to Allocate 132,118
Less General Fund Share 93,407
Total to Allocate to Other Funds 38,711
* DRAFT * 79
Transfers
* DRAFT * 80
City of Crescent City FY 2022-23 Budget
Fund To/From Purpose Transfers In Transfers Out
General Fund
001 General Fund
Transfer in from Gas Tax Fund To reimburse General Fund for street maintenance 200,678 Transfer in from Insurance Fund To reimburse General Fund for safety expenditures 41,100 Transfer in from other funds for Administrative ServicesTo reimburse General Fund for a portion of City Council, City Clerk, and HR costs 235,587 Transfer in from ARPA Fund To reimburse General Fund for Econ Dev / Grants costs 113,802 Transfer out to Internal Service Funds To cover Internal Service Fund costs 469,107 Transfer out to Capital Improvement Fund To cover contributions for general capital improvements 1,217,534 Transfer out to Fire Vehicle Replacement Fund To cover contribution for fire vehicle replacements 38,000 Transfer out to Police Vehicle Replacement Fund To cover contribution for police vehicle replacements 120,000 Special Revenue Funds
104 CDBG Program Income
Transfer in from CDBG Rehab Loan Fund To transfer program income earned in current year 1,500 Transfer out to General CIP Fund To transfer prior year defederalized program income 1,500 107 CDBG Loan Fund
Transfer out to CDBG Program Income Fund To transfer program income earned in current year 1,500 110 Housing
Transfer out to General Fund To reimburse General Fund for a portion of HR costs 7,172 Transfer out to Internal Service Funds To cover Internal Service Fund costs 17,398 115 Gas Tax
Transfer out to General Fund To reimburse General Fund for street maintenance 200,678 120 ARPA
Transfer out to General Fund To reimburse General Fund for Econ Dev / Grants costs 113,802 Transfer out to Sewer Fund To reimburse Sewer Fund for Econ Dev / Grants costs 29,004 Transfer out to Water Fund To reimburse Water Fund for Econ Dev / Grants costs 29,004 Transfer out to General CIP Fund To cover project costs (Front Street and Pool HVAC) 1,186,391 Enterprise Funds
412 RV Park
Transfer out to General Fund To reimburse General Fund for a portion of City Council, City Clerk, and HR costs 15,314 Transfer out to Internal Service Funds To cover Internal Service Fund costs 52,429 413 Sewer
Transfer in from ARPA Fund To reimburse Sewer Fund for Econ Dev / Grants costs 29,004 Transfer out to General Fund To reimburse General Fund for a portion of City Council, City Clerk, and HR costs 105,567 Transfer out to Internal Service Funds To cover Internal Service Fund costs 391,741 Transfer out to Sewer CIP Fund To cover CIP costs 742,000 Transfer out to Equipment Fund To cover contribution for vehicle and equipment purchases 66,100 419 Water
Transfer in from ARPA Fund To reimburse Water Fund for Econ Dev / Grants costs 29,004 Transfer out to General Fund To reimburse General Fund for a portion of City Council, City Clerk, and HR costs 107,523 Transfer out to Internal Service Funds To cover Internal Service Fund costs 422,756 Transfer out to Water CIP Fund To cover CIP costs 220,000 Transfer out to Equipment Fund To cover contribution for vehicle and equipment purchases 153,300 Internal Service Funds
420 Info Tech Services
Transfer in from various funds To cover Information/Technology services 366,616 Transfer in from Insurance Fund To cover safety expenditures 4,500 506 Building Services
Transfer in from various funds To cover building services 258,670 Transfer in from Insurance Fund To cover safety expenditures 7,500 508 Equipment Services
Transfer in from various funds To cover equipment services and vehicle and equipment purchases 573,343 620 Insurance Services
Transfer in from various funds To cover insurance services 374,191 Transfer out to General Fund To cover safety expenditures 41,100 Transfer out to IT Fund To cover safety expenditures 4,500 Transfer out to Building Fund To cover safety expenditures 7,500 Capital Improvement Funds
901 General CIP Fund
Transfer in from General Fund To cover contributions for general capital improvements 1,217,534 Transfer in from CDBG Program Income Fund To transfer defederalized program income 1,500 Transfer in from ARPA Fund To cover project costs (Front Street and Pool HVAC) 1,186,391 930 Fire Vehicle Replacement Fund
Transfer in from General Fund To cover fire vehicle replacements 38,000 940 Police Vehicle Replacement Fund
Transfer in from General Fund To cover police vehicle replacements 120,000 913 Sewer CIP Fund
Transfer in from Sewer Fund To cover CIP costs 742,000
919 Water CIP Fund
Transfer in from Water Fund To cover CIP costs 220,000
TOTAL 5,760,920 5,760,920
* DRAFT * 81
Authorized
Position Control
* DRAFT * 82
City of Crescent City
Position Control
Authorized Positions & Pay Ranges 07.01.22
Position Title Bargaining Unit Min Annual Max Annual Min Annual Max Annual Current
Auth FTE Change
Proposed
FTE Notes
Administration
City Manager Contract 104,506 133,536 107,641 137,542 1.00 1.00 City Attorney Contract 99,281 124,468 102,259 128,202 1.00 1.00 City Clerk / Administrative Analyst CCMEA 61,818 75,150 63,673 77,405 1.00 1.00 HR Manager CCMEA 53,394 64,917 54,996 66,865 1.00 1.00
Information Systems Administrator CCMEA 68,162 82,846 70,207 85,331 1.00 1.00 IT / GIS Technician CCMEA 46,134 56,077 47,518 57,759 1.00 1.00 Finance
Director of Finance Contract 91,950 115,277 94,709 118,735 1.00 1.00 Finance Analysts 2.00 2.00
Finance Analyst II CCMEA 58,885 71,573 60,652 73,720
Finance Analyst I CCMEA 53,394 64,917 54,996 66,865
Finance Technician and PR Admin 1.50 1.50
Finance Technician CCMEA 48,443 58,885 49,896 60,652
Payroll Administrator CCMEA 48,443 58,885 49,896 60,652 Account Clerks 2.00 2.00
Account Clerk II CECC 37,960 46,134 39,099 47,518
Account Clerk I CECC 34,424 41,850 35,457 43,106
Fire
Fire Chief Contract 91,950 115,277 94,709 118,735 1.00 1.00 Fire Captain II TBD - - 65,618 79,767 - 3.00 3.00 New positions Administrative Assistant CECC 41,850 50,856 43,106 52,382 1.00 1.00 Police
Chief of Police Contract 91,950 115,277 94,709 118,735 1.00 1.00 Lieutenant CCPOA 86,195 99,466 88,781 102,450 1.00 1.00 Sergeant CCPOA 68,931 85,530 70,999 88,096 3.00 3.00
Police Officers and Recruits 8.00 2.00 10.00 Add 1 Measure S funded position Police Officer CCPOA 50,877 67,954 52,403 69,993 - - and 1 grant funded position Police Officer - Limited Term CCPOA 50,877 67,954 52,403 69,993 - - Police Recruit CCPOA 37,482 37,482 38,606 38,606 - -
Records Specialist CECC 41,850 50,856 43,106 52,382 1.00 1.00 Planning, Building & Code Enforcement
Planning Technician CCMEA 46,134 56,077 47,518 57,759 - - Building Inspector & Code Enforcement Officer * CCMEA 50,856 61,818 52,382 63,673 0.46 0.46 Office Technician ** CECC 34,424 41,850 35,457 43,106 1.00 1.00 Economic Development and Recreation
Economic Development and Recreation Director Contract 86,461 108,418 89,055 111,671 1.00 1.00 Grants and Economic Development Coordinator CCMEA 58,885 71,573 60,652 73,720 1.00 1.00 Recreation Lead Unrepresented 31,720 37,440 31,720 38,480 0.48 0.48 RV Park Supervisor CCEA 39,853 48,443 41,049 49,896 1.00 1.00 Campground Attendant Unrepresented 32,427 39,416 32,427 39,416 0.60 0.60 Aquatics Supervisor CCMEA 46,134 56,077 47,518 57,759 1.00 1.00 Relief Supervisor/Lesson Coordinator CCEA 39,853 48,443 41,049 49,896 2.00 2.00 Part-time Lifeguards 5.40 5.40
5.4 full-time equivalents (each FTE
equal to 2080 hours per year) for a
total of 11,232 hours divided among
all part-time lifeguards
Lifeguard - Designated Head Lifeguard Unrepresented 32,760 37,440 32,760 38,480 Lifeguard - Part-Time Unrepresented 31,720 37,440 31,720 38,480 Aquatic Specialty Program Instructor Unrepresented 33,800 37,440 33,800 38,480 Water Safety Aide Unrepresented 32,240 34,320 32,240 35,360 Public Works
Director of Public Works Contract 91,950 115,277 94,709 118,735 1.00 1.00 Engineering Project Manager CCMEA 58,885 71,573 60,652 73,720 1.00 1.00 Engineering Technician CCMEA 46,134 56,077 47,518 57,759 1.00 1.00 Public Works Maintenance Manager CCMEA 71,573 86,986 73,720 89,596 1.00 1.00 Public Works Parks / Buildings / Maintenance Workers &
Equipment Operators 12.04 12.04
Maintenance Workers
Senior Public Works Maintenance Worker CCEA 48,443 58,885 49,896 60,652 Maintenance Worker III CCEA 39,853 48,443 41,049 49,896 Maintenance Worker II CCEA 36,150 43,930 37,235 45,248
Maintenance Worker I CCEA 34,424 41,850 35,457 43,106
Maintenance Worker 1 (part-time and seasonal) Unrepresented 34,424 41,850 35,457 43,106 Equipment Operators
Equipment Operator II CCEA 43,930 53,394 45,248 54,996
Equipment Operator I CCEA 37,960 46,134 39,099 47,518
Senior Bldgs & Parks Maintenance Worker CCEA 39,853 48,443 41,049 49,896 EMOT 3.00 3.00
Senior Electrical Mechanical Operations Technician CCEA 64,917 78,894 66,865 81,261 Electrical Mechanical Operations Technician II CCEA 56,077 68,162 57,759 70,207 Electrical Mechanical Operations Technician I CCEA 48,443 58,885 49,896 60,652 Utility Mechanic CCEA 39,853 48,443 41,049 49,896 1.00 1.00 Laboratory Director CCMEA 61,818 75,150 63,673 77,405 1.00 1.00 Laboratory Assistant / Tech 2.00 (0.52) 1.48
Make one vacant tech position parttime
Laboratory Technician II CCEA 50,856 61,818 52,382 63,673 Laboratory Technician I CCEA 41,850 50,856 43,106 52,382 Laboratory Assistant CCEA 34,424 41,850 35,457 43,106
Fleet Mechanics 2.00 2.00
Senior Mechanic CCEA 56,077 68,162 57,759 70,207
Mechanic II CCEA 43,930 53,394 45,248 54,996
Mechanic I CCEA 36,150 43,930 37,235 45,248
Housing Authority
Housing Authority Director Contract 86,461 108,418 89,055 111,671 1.00 1.00 Housing Authority Inspector CCEA 39,853 48,443 41,049 49,896 - - Tenant Services Technician CECC 41,850 50,856 43,106 52,382 2.00 2.00 Office Technician CECC 34,424 41,850 35,457 43,106 1.00 1.00 Totals 71.48 4.48 75.96
* 0.46 FTE split between Building/Code Enforcement and Housing Authority ** 1.0 FTE split between Planning and Public Works
Pay ranges do not include special pay, i.e. certification, longevity, merit, etc.
Min and max annual pay ranges are equivalent to base hourly rate times 2,080 hours per year. Actual hours for positions may be different.
Auth Pay Range - Current Auth Pay Range - Proposed
* DRAFT * 83
Appropriations Limit
* DRAFT * 84
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-XX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CRESCENT CITY, CALIFORNIA SELECTING THE ANNUAL ADJUSTMENT FACTORS FOR THE CALCULATION OF THE 2022-23
APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR THE CITY OF CRESCENT CITY
WHEREAS, Article XIII B of the California Constitution does specify that the Appropriations Limit for cities may increase annually if selection of the adjustment factors for calculation thereof has been made; and
WHEREAS, the net change in the total county population or the net change in the total city population may be selected for the population adjustment factor; and WHEREAS, the change in California per capita personal income or the change in the local assessment roll due to local non-residential construction may be selected for the inflationary adjustment factor.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Crescent City as follows:
1. The net change in total county population and the change in California per capita personal income are hereby selected as the annual adjustment factors for calculation of the 2022-23 Appropriations Limit for Crescent City, California.
2. The annual appropriations limit for fiscal year 2022-23 is $34,838,769.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that in the absence of the data necessary to calculate the increase in the non-residential assessed valuation, the fiscal year 2022-23 Appropriations Limit for Crescent City is hereby adopted on a provisional basis using the alternative factor of per capita income for the inflationary adjustment and may need to be adjusted once the assessment data is available.
The above and foregoing Resolution No. 2022-XX was introduced by Council Member ________________, seconded by Council Member _______________ and passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Crescent City held on the 20th day of June 2022 by the following polled vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Jason Greenough, Mayor
ATTEST:
Robin Patch, City Clerk
* DRAFT * 85
% Change
over prior year
A. Price Factor
Per capita personal income 2022-23 7.55%
Population Factor
City 2022-23 -0.88%
County 2022-23 -0.56%
B. Calculation
Per capita personal income ratio 1.0755
Population ratio 0.9944
Calculation of factor for FY 2022-23 A times B 1.0695
2021-22 2022-23 2022-23 2022-23 2022-23 2022-23
Limit Limit Proceeds of
Taxes
Exclusions Appropriations
Subject to Limit
Under (Over)
Limit
General Fund 6,391,539 6,835,606 6,421,832 (1,097,534) 5,324,298 1,511,308 Special Revenue Funds 6,242,320 6,676,019 - - - 6,676,019 Enterprise Funds 15,969,184 17,078,678 - - - 17,078,678 Internal Service Funds 1,839,543 1,967,350 - - - 1,967,350 Public Financing Authority 1,560,913 1,669,361 - - - 1,669,361 Fiduciary Funds 572,014 611,756 - - - 611,756
32,575,514 34,838,769 6,421,832 (1,097,534) 5,324,298 29,514,471 APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT: Fiscal Year 2022-23
* DRAFT * 86
Measure S
Oversight Committee
Recommendations
87 88
89 90
91 92
93 : http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes.xhtml.
May 2022
Dear Fiscal Officer:
Subject: Price Factor and Population Information
Appropriations Limit
California Revenue and Taxation Code section 2227 requires the Department of Finance to transmit an estimate of the percentage change in population to local governments. Each local jurisdiction must use their percentage change in population factor for January 1, 2022, in conjunction with a change in the cost of living, or price factor, to calculate their appropriations limit for fiscal year 2022-23. Attachment A provides the change in California’s per capita personal income and an example for utilizing the price factor and population percentage change factor to calculate the 2022-23 appropriations limit. Attachment B provides the city and unincorporated county population percentage change. Attachment C provides the population percentage change for counties and their summed incorporated areas. The population percentage change data excludes federal and state institutionalized populations and military populations.
Population Percent Change for Special Districts
Some special districts must establish an annual appropriations limit. California Revenue and Taxation Code section 2228 provides additional information regarding the appropriations limit.
Article XIII B, section 9(C) of the California Constitution exempts certain special districts from the appropriations limit calculation mandate. The code section and the California Constitution can be accessed at the following website
Special districts required by law to calculate their appropriations limit must present the calculation as part of their annual audit. Any questions special districts have on this requirement should be directed to their county, district legal counsel, or the law itself. No state agency reviews the local appropriations limits.
Population Certification
The population certification program applies only to cities and counties. California Revenue and Taxation Code section 11005.6 mandates Finance to automatically certify any population estimate that exceeds the current certified population with the State Controller’s Office. Finance will certify the higher estimate to the State Controller by June 1, 2022.
Please Note: The prior year’s city population estimates may be revised. The per capita personal income change is based on historical data.
If you have any questions regarding this data, please contact the Demographic Research Unit at (916) 323-4086.
KEELY MARTIN BOSLER
Director
By:
ERIKA LI
Chief Deputy Director
Attachment
May 2022
Attachment A
A. Price Factor: Article XIII B specifies that local jurisdictions select their cost of living factor to compute their appropriation limit by a vote of their governing body. The cost of living factor provided here is per capita personal income. If the percentage change in per capita personal income is selected, the percentage change to be used in setting the fiscal year 2022-23 appropriation limit is:
Per Capita Personal Income
Fiscal Year Percentage change
(FY) over prior year
2022-23 7.55
B. Following is an example using sample population change and the change in California per capita personal income as growth factors in computing a 2022-23 appropriation limit.
2022-23:
Per Capita Cost of Living Change = 7.55 percent
Population Change = -0.30 percent
Per Capita Cost of Living converted to a ratio: 7.55 + 100 = 1.0755 100
Population converted to a ratio: -0.30 + 100 = 0.997
100
Calculation of factor for FY 2022-23: 1.0755 x 0.997 = 1.0723
Fiscal Year 2022-23
Attachment B
Annual Percent Change in Population Minus Exclusions*
January 1, 2021 to January 1, 2022 and Total Population, January 1, 2022 Total
County Population Percent Change --- Population Minus Exclusions --- City 2021-2022 1-1-21 1-1-22 1-1-2022
Del Norte
Crescent City -0.88 4,111 4,075 6,060
Unincorporated -0.50 21,219 21,112 21,158
County Total -0.56 25,330 25,187 27,218
*Exclusions include residents on federal military installations and group quarters residents in state mental institutions, state and federal correctional institutions and veteran homes.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
TO: MAYOR GREENOUGH AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ERIC WIER, CITY MANAGER
BY: BOB BROWN, CONTRACT CITY PLANNER
JON OLSON, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
DATE: JUNE 20, 2022
SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT
_____________________________________________________________________
RECOMMENDATION
• Hear staff report
• Technical questions from Council
• Receive public comment
• Further Council discussion
• Provide further direction to staff about the General Plan Annual Progress Report, or review and accept the General Plan Annual Progress Report
BACKGROUND
The background and purpose of this General Plan Annual Report is included in the document as well as an executive summary. This report is required to come before the City Council for their review and acceptance each year so that the Council can determine if the General Plan is still active and that it is being used by the City in the long-term physical development of the City. This report is also the tool for the City Council to use in determining if the General Plan needs update or revision.
ANALYSIS
The Report supports the finding that the General Plan is utilized by the City in the longterm physical development of the City. Its goals, policies and actions are still relevant in 2021 and there is no need to update the direction provided. The exception to this is the state mandated update for the 6th Cycle Housing Element, which the City is in the process of completing in 2022.
One of the primary indicators to support the adequacy of the City’s General Plan is the lack of population growth as projected in the 2001 General Plan. The City’s 2001 General Plan indicated that in 1996 the population of the City was at 4,653 (excluding the prison population) and the projected City population in 2020 was to be at 7,484. In 2 2010 the population was estimated at 4,177 and in 2020 the population was 4464. In that sense, the goals and policies that were written in 2001 to assist the City to get to the 7,484 population are still relevant. The list of capital improvement projects the City has been pursuing are consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan.
This report will be the first prepared for the City with annual updates thereafter. The Annual Performance Report for the Housing Element has already been submitted to the State, though the findings of that report are included herein.
Staff and the City’s consultant recommend that the City Council review and accept this report and direct staff to turn it into the State. Other options include the City Council spending more time reviewing its General Plan, either prior to submitting this or even looking at it in more detail this fall/winter in preparation for next year’s General Plan Annual Report. Attached to this staff report for reference (but not a part of the General Plan Annual Report) is a list of the goals, policies and action items from the 2001 General Plan.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no direct fiscal impact to accepting the annual report and filing it with the State.
ATTACHMENTS
1. General Plan / Housing Element 2021 Annual Report
2. List of the goals, policies, and action items from the 2001 General Plan City of Crescent City
2021 City of Crescent City
General Plan/Housing Element
Annual Report
Submitted by:
City of Crescent City Planning Department
377 J Street
Crescent City, CA 95531
June 2022
ANNUAL HOUSING ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
City or County Name: City of Crescent City
Mailing Address:
City of Crescent City
377 J Street
Crescent City, CA 95531
Contact Person: Ethan Lawton
Title: Contract City Planner
Phone: (707) 633-9031
E-mail: [email protected]
Reporting Period by Calendar Year: January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021 These forms and tables, including the Certificate of Accuracy, are due to the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) and the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) on or before April 1, 2022.
Submit separate reports directly to both HCD and OPR (Government Code Section 65400) at the addresses listed below:
Department of Housing and Community Development
Division of Housing Policy Development
P.O. Box 952053
Sacramento, CA 94252-2053
-andGovernor’s Office of Planning and Research
P.O. Box 3044
Sacramento, CA 95812-3044
CERTIFICATION OF ACCURACY
The undersigned, in the capacity of City Planner on behalf of the City of Crescent City, has reviewed the information provided in the forms and report contained herein, and certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that the information provided herein is true and correct.
Ethan Lawton, Contract City Planner Date
June, 10, 2022
4 City of Crescent City
2021 General Plan and Housing Element Annual Report
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE OF THE GENERAL PLAN ANNUAL REPORT General – State Law and Local Planning
California Government Code Section 65400(a)(2) mandates that all cities and counties submit to their legislative bodies an annual report on the status of the general plan and progress in its implementation. Only charter cities are exempt from the requirement to prepare progress reports, pursuant to Government Code Section 65700. A copy of this progress report must also be sent to the Governor's Office of Planning and Research (OPR) and the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD).
The intent is to ensure that the general plan directs all land use decisions and remains an effective guide for future development. Because the role of the general plan is to act as a “constitution” for the long-term physical development of a community and because it is required to be updated periodically to reflect current circumstances, it is critical that local planning agencies periodically review the general plan and its implementation.The annual report is a tool for achieving this.
The main purpose and most important function of the report is to provide local legislative bodies with information regarding implementation of their general plans. The report must be presented to the local legislative body for their review and acceptance. This is typically done by placing the report on a regular meeting agenda as a consent or discussion item.
City of Crescent City – Growth and the General Plan
The City of Crescent City General Plan (2001) was adopted by the City Council May 21, 2001.
Since the plan’s adoption, the City has sought to implement the programs contained in it through a variety of efforts including application of General Plan polices during the review of new development projects, substantive environmental review of new development, construction of new and updated infrastructure through the annual Capital Improvement Program, continued active code enforcement efforts, and an aggressive economic development program. The City’s General Plan continues to be a valid and useful document, having been adopted in May 2001, with its goals and policies being advanced by City actions throughout the 2021 calendar year.
City of Crescent City 2014-2019 Housing Element
The City of Crescent City 2014-2019 Housing Element update (Housing Element or HE) was adopted by the City Council on June 6, 2016. The HE was certified by the California Department of Housing and Community Development for compliance with state housing element law.
The Housing Element outlines the City’s goals, policies, and programs in relation to the provision of housing, addresses the City’s success in implementing the previous Housing Element, and provides a detailed demographic and analytical evaluation of how the City is planning to accommodate its share of the region’s housing needs during the planning period. The primary components of the current Housing Element remain consistent with the City’s previous Housing Element. The findings suggest that the City has made strides toward the achievement of accommodating its regional fair share of affordable housing needs and will continue to move toward meeting the goals of the Housing Element.
5 City of Crescent City
2021 General Plan and Housing Element Annual Report
The City is currently in the process of updating its housing element to remain compliant with current state law and accurately plan to meet its updated RHNA numbers. The 6th cycle element is scheduled for completion towards the end of the 2022 calendar year.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
As described in this report, the City of Crescent City General Plan is a useful and valuable tool to assist the City in providing policy direction to decision-makers and information for residents and interested parties.
In that context and in terms of the City of Crescent City and its General Plan, this report concludes the following:
• The City of Crescent City General Plan continues to be a valid and useful document, which provides guidance and direction for the City, as intended. • In comparing current City of Crescent City General Plan projections to the current setting, the main thrust of the General Plan projections are correct; the plan recognized that limited new residential development would be necessary to meet projected demand. • Detailed information about the City and the surrounding area is included in all of the elements of the current City of Crescent City General Plan. The overarching, supporting, and descriptive information is accurate and therefore useful. • The adopted 2014–2019 Housing Element focused on the City’s progress toward meeting its regional housing needs allocation, with the land supply available to meet itstargets, and the scheduled update will keep the same focus.
IS THE GENERAL PLAN SERVING TO MEET ITS OWN GOALS?
The Crescent City General Plan does not have one overarching goal that serves as a guiding principle for the document, rather it has separate goals unique to each element.
A determination as to whether Goals are being met may be subjective, but there are objective measures as well. One metric to determine whether a community maintains its qualities is the presence of growth interests. The section below titled Development Activity 2021 (on pages 16) summarizes the development applications and activity that have occurred over the last year. Prior to that summary is a review of the stage set by the GeneralPlan.
General Plan Land Use Projections
The City of Crescent City General Plan Housing Element 2014-2019 summarizes projections for population growth between 2020 and 2050. The Population Trends section included the following Department of Finance (DOF) Population Projections under its Population Projectionsheading:
6 City of Crescent City
2021 General Plan and Housing Element Annual Report
Population projections for the city are not currently available. However, the Department of Finance provides projections for all counties through 2050. The table below shows the expected population growth for both the incorporated and unincorporated portions of Del Norte County between 2020 and 2050. Based on DOF projections, the county is expected to experience an annual growth rate of approximately 0.14 percent between 2020 and 2050.
Del Norte County
Population
Projections
2020 2030 2040 2050 Annual Growth
2020-2050
Del Norte County 29,146 30,197 30,408 30,340 0.14%
Population Increase - 1,051 211 -68 39.8
(Source: HE page A-7, California Department of Finance, Report P-1, December 2014) The City’s 2001 General Plan indicated that the projected County population in 2020 was to be at 42,197 by 2020, this growth was never realized.
Current Setting
One of the primary indicators to support the adequacy of the City’s General Plan is the lack of population growth as projected in the 2001 General Plan. The City’s 2001 General Plan indicated that in 1996 the population of the City was at 4,653 (excluding the prison population) and the projected City population in 2020 was to be at 7,484. The City of Crescent City 2014-2019 Housing Element states that the City’s population (without Pelican Bay State Prison) was at 3,888 in 2000 and increased to 4,177 in 2010. From 2010 to 2013 the City’s population decreased by approximately 2.26 percent (173 people) and in 2020 the population was 4,464. The City is expected to maintain a stable population for the duration of the current planning period and is well within the population projections (7,484) of the General Plan.
Regional Housing Needs
A Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) Plan is mandated by the State of California (Government Code Section 65584) for regions to address housing issues and needs based on future growth projections for the area. The State also establishes the number of total housing units needed for each region. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65584, the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) developed an RHNA Plan for Del Norte County, which identifies a need for a specific number of new residential units in the county over a 12-year period (December 31, 2018 to September 15, 2030). The need for residential units is shared and distributed among each of the communities in the county, with each community’s share determined by its proportion of the county’s overall household population.
The intent of the RHNA Plan is to ensure that local jurisdictions not only address the needs of their immediate areas but also provide their share of housing needs for the entire region.
Additionally, a major goal of the RHNA Plan is to ensure that every community provides an opportunity for a mix of affordable housing to all economic segments of its population. The RHNA Plan’s jurisdictional allocations are made to ensure that adequate sites and zoning are provided 7 City of Crescent City
2021 General Plan and Housing Element Annual Report
to address existing and anticipated housing demands during the planning period and that market forces are not inhibited in addressing the housing needs for all facets of a particularcommunity.
Based on the RHNA Plan for Del Norte County, the City of Crescent City’s share of regional housing needs is 189 units. The RHNA Plan identified the need for 39 units for very-low-income households, 22 units for lower-income households, 27 units for moderate-income households, and 101 units for above moderate-income households.
Planning to accommodate these RHNA numbers is currently taking progress with the creation of the City’s 6th cycle Housing Element. This document is not complete, or certified, but it is currently anticipated that the City will have adequate capacity through vacant parcel development, lot improvements, ADUs or other strategies to meet is RHNA requirements. Between the pending projects in the city and the available residential land for development, the City of Crescent City has the capacity to meet its regional housing needs.
Projected Needs (Regional Housing Need Allocation)
Jurisdiction Very Low Low Moderate Above Moderate Total Crescent City 39 22 27 101 189
Percentage of Total 20.6% 11.6% 14.3% 53.4% 100.0%
Summary
Utilizing the General Plan’s projections compared to the current setting, it is concluded that the General Plan projections were correct in that they identified new residential development would be required to meet demand. The City’s Housing Element identified some new requirements (resulting from outside legislation) that have created new targets for the City to meet, and through the required internal consistency will work in concert to support the General Plan to address those goals. It is thus concluded that the General Plan is serving to meet itsgoals.
ADEQUACY OF THE CURRENT CITY OF CRESCENT CITY GENERAL PLAN Government Code Section 65302 states that “the general plan shall consist of a statement of development policies and shall include a diagram or diagrams and text setting forth objectives, principles, standards, and plan proposals.” At the time the 2001 General Plan was written, the state required seven elements be included which are described in this report. Recent state legislation requires that an environmental justice element also be included in a general plan.
According to Government Code Section 65302(h)(2) this element must be included in the general plan upon the adoption or next revision of two or more elements concurrently on or after January 1, 2018. It, however, does not have to be a stand-alone element but the environmental justice goals, policies, and objectives can be included in otherelements. Other element update changes are contained in OPRs 2017 General Plan Guidelines, which will be used in subsequent General Plan updates.
For one of the required elements, the Housing Element, the Government Code is very specific about contents, requirements, and frequency of adoption. The requirements for the other six elements are less specific. The Government Code requires that the City’s housing element be 8 City of Crescent City
2021 General Plan and Housing Element Annual Report
reviewed and adopted or re-adopted every 8 years, while the other elements of the plan should be revised “as needed” to keep information current. The City of Crescent City General Plan contains all seven of the required elements and comprises a legally adequate General Plan.
The City of Crescent City General Plan was consistent with state requirements when it was adopted in May 2001 and remains consistent with state requirements to this day. The Housing Element was updated and adopted in June 2016 and has been certified by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) to be in compliance with state housing element law.
This is the first Annual Progress Report for the City’s General Plan in this format. The City responded previously to OPR’s Annual Planning Surveys. The City has also completed annual progress reports for its Housing Element since 2014. It should be recognized that, prior to this annual report, the City put forward much effort into implementing its General Plan for meeting the goals, policies and implementation programs and projects found in the City’s General Plan, which has not been recorded herein.
Usefulness of the Plan
A general plan has been described by the courts as “the constitution for development” (of a jurisdiction). All development approvals must be consistent with the general plan. Therefore, a general plan is useful if it provides up-to-date information, goals, policies, and programs that are consistent with current city growth policies and which are physically and economically feasible to implement. As noted earlier, the City is well below the City’s population projections stated in its General Plan. The table below displays the dates of the currently adopted elements as well as their most recent updates and/or amendments.
Adopted Elements Year
Adopted
Last
Comprehensive
Update
Last
Amendment
Land Use and Community
Development Element 2001 N/A N/A
Housing Element 2001 2016 N/A
Transportation and Circulation
Element 2001 N/A N/A
Public Facilities and Services
Element 2001 N/A N/A
Recreational and Cultural
Resources Element 2001 N/A N/A
Natural Resources/Conservation
Element 2001 N/A N/A
Health & Safety Element 2001 N/A N/A
The Crescent City General Plan elements are listed below, with a brief description of what they include, followed by a brief discussion and summary regarding what was completed during the 2021 calendar year to ensure that the goals, policies, and programs set forth in the General Plan have been addressed.
9 City of Crescent City
2021 General Plan and Housing Element Annual Report
LAND USE AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT
A land use element which designates the proposed general distribution and general location and extent of the uses of the land for housing, business, industry, open space...and other categories of public and private uses of land. [It]...shall include a statement of the standards of population and building intensity recommended for the various districts...
The Land Use and Community Development Element of the General Plan contains the following goals:
• To encourage the overall economic and social growth of the City while maintaining its positions of importance in the county and improving its overall aesthetic appeal. • To create a compact, pedestrian-oriented, economically robust VLC [Visitor and Local Commercial] area that provides a clear geographic focus for attracting visitors and residents and for increasing private sector investment. • To enrich and enhance pedestrian/tourist activity in the downtown by creating attractive and well-maintained public open space that will provide a sense of central space or village atmosphere where people could meet, socialize, and eat. • To expand and enhance the VLC area, Crescent City Harbor, and downtown as a tourist destination.
• To create a safe, clean, and pedestrian-friendly downtown area. • To provide adequate land in a range of residential densities to accommodate the housing needs of all income groups expected to reside in Crescent City, while ensuring a high quality of residential development.
• To designate adequate commercial land for and promote development of commercial uses compatible with surrounding land uses to meet the present and future needs of Crescent City residents, the regional community, and visitors and to maintain economic vitality.
• To designate adequate land for and promote development of industrial uses to meet the present and future needs of Crescent City residents for jobs and to maintain economic viability.
• To maintain a healthy and diverse local economy that meets the present and future employment, shopping, recreational, public safety, and service needs of Crescent City residents and to expand the economic base to better serve the needs of residents • To maintain and enhance the quality of Crescent City’s built environment (i.e. historical buildings, major corridors, city entrances, landscape, and streetscape). • To ensure optimum utilization of the Harbor’s commercial tourism and recreational potential while allowing for appropriate public and private uses, developing access as a harbor, conserving the Harbor’s open water, improving the Harbor’s aesthetic appeal, and increasing its economic viability.
• To provide for the ongoing administration and implementation of the General Plan.
These goals contain policies and programs that generally seek to ensure a high quality of life, efficient development, and economic growth. Within that framework, staff worked on the following items throughout the 2021 calendar year to ensure that the goals set forth in the General Plan 10 City of Crescent City
2021 General Plan and Housing Element Annual Report
have been addressed:
• In 2021 COVID continued, putting some anticipated projects on-hold, with employees and residents isolating or working virtually. It is believed that, based on out-of-state license plates, that people moved to or visited Del Norte County to isolate from COVID impacts in the urban areas.
• Capital Improvement Program completed 2021:
o Connection of GenSet at WWTP to MBR system
o Water SCADA modifications for water optimization
o Complete Sunset Circle Trail Project
o Water Modeling development complete Phase I
o Complete Phase II Wayfinding signs
o Coordinate WWTP CIP projects
o Continue implementation of automated meter reading system o Completed C-Street Portion of the Front Street Storm Drain Project o Front and F Street still under construction
o Completed PS & E for Amador Water Tank & Bid, WWTP Paving Project, and WWTP generator
o Installed majority of the Wayfinding Signs on Hwy 101 corridor o Coordination with Caltrans on accessibility projects along Hwy 101 corridor (multiyear Project) for Hydrant and Streetlight Relocation o Ranney Collector bid out replacement of two pumps
o Begin PS & E for Pebble Beach Bank Stabilization
o Working with Local Transportation Commission through the TAC to fund City Projects
o Comply with CEQA by updating policies for SB 743 (VMT vs. LOS) o Start water system modeling and transient pressure study o Multi-unit housing no smoking ordinance
o Digitizing of planning files
o Complete Small Cell Tower Ordinance
o Complete Mobile Vending Ordinance (Issue 1 mobile vending permit) o Complete Commercial Cannabis Regulations (issue 4 CUP +1 revision) o Complete revised model water efficient landscape ordinance o Draft Long-term RV parking for residential use
o Draft Beachfront Park Master Plan review
o Economic Development Strategies Action Plan
o LEAP Planning Grant application submitted to promote housing ($70k noncompetitive) - o Elk Valley Rancheria BOR grant submitted for Amador ($200k) o Local Roadway Safety Plan $36k non-competitive process submitted o CA endowment for anti-tobacco policies ($9k) smoke free multi-family housing o Office of emergency services application submitted for more generators o REAP Planning Grant joint City/County application submitted ($90k) o Recycled water feasibility study grant application submitted ($150k: pending) Summary/Conclusion: The Land Use Element is useful and adequate in its characterization of the nature of the city and the General Plan’s overarching goals and policies. No amendments to the 11 City of Crescent City
2021 General Plan and Housing Element Annual Report
Land Use Plan were made nor required in 2021.
HOUSING ELEMENT
The housing element shall consist of an identification and analysis of existing and projected housing needs and a statement of goals, policies, quantified objectives, financial resources, and scheduled programs for the preservation, improvement, and development of housing. [It] shall identify adequate sites for housing, including rental housing, factory-built housing, and mobile homes, and shall make adequate provision for the existing and projected needs of all economic segments of the community... (Section 65580). Each local government shall review its housing element as frequently as appropriate...but not less than every five years. (Section 65588) In 2019, four building permits were issued: three for single-family homes and one for a multifamily unit. In 2020, five building permits were issued: four for single-family homes and one accessory dwelling unit. Four certificates of occupancy were issued for single-family homes. No permits were issued for multi-family units in 2020. In 2021, five building permits were issued for single-family homes and one certificate of occupancy was issued for a single-family home. No permits were issued for multi-family units in 2021.
The updated City of Crescent City’s Housing Element is based on seven strategic goals:
1) To support housing development opportunities meeting quantified City objectives. 2) To assist in the development of adequate housing to meet the needs of extremely low-, very low-, low-, and moderate-income households.
3) To pursue conservation and enhancement of existing housing units to provide adequate, safe, and decent housing for all Crescent City residents. 4) To address, and where appropriate and legal possible, remove governmental constraints for all housing, including housing for special needs groups. 5) To pursue sustainable development and energy efficiency for new residential development and existing housing stock, including green building technologies. 6) To promote housing opportunities for all persons regardless of race, gender, age, sexual orientation, marital status, or national origin.
7) To ensure that the goals and programs of this document are reviewed and utilized during the planning period and updated in a timely manner.
Summary/Conclusion: The long-term housing goal is to facilitate and encourage housing that fulfills the diverse needs of the community. The 2014-2019 Housing Element was adopted in June 2016 and has been certified by the California Department of Housing and Community Development for compliance with state housing element law. Generally, the Housing Element provides information and policy guidance on issues including affordable housing and housing for special needs groups and identifies potential programs that the City utilizes to help fill underserved housing needs in the community. The 2014-2019 Housing Element has functioned as a useful and adequate element of the General Plan over the course of the past year (see Annual Element Progress Report – Housing Element Implementation). The City is currently in the process of implementing it 5th cycle Housing Element, encouraging housing in the downtown area and codifying the State requirements for Accessory Dwelling units and other State legislative acts as well as updating to its 6th cycle Housing Element to remain compliant with state law and better address the needs of the community. 12 City of Crescent City
2021 General Plan and Housing Element Annual Report
TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION ELEMENT
A circulation element consisting of the general location and extent of existing and proposed major thoroughfares, transportation routes, terminals, and other local public utilities and facilities, all correlated with the land use element of the plan… Goals listed in the Transportation and Circulation Element of the Crescent City General Plan, are as follows:
• To plan for the long-range planning and development of Highway 101 to ensure the safe and efficient movement of people and goods.
• To develop and maintain a safe and efficient public transportation system that reduces congestion and provides viable alternative transportation in and through the Crescent City Planning Area.
• To encourage the use of the bicycle as an alternate, energy efficient mode of transportation within the city and to develop a system of bikeways and bicycle parking facilities which will safely and effectively serve those wishing to utilize bicycles for commute and recreational trips.
• To encourage and facilitate walking throughout the city. • To promote the improvement and maintenance of general and commercial aviation facilities within the parameters of surrounding land uses. • To promote the maintenance and improvement of the Crescent City Harbor facilities. • To promote development of multimedia communications as a viable mode of transportation and commerce.
The goals contain several policies and programs that generally seek to enhance the movement of goods and people throughout the city, provide safe walking routes for residents, and maintain and improve the quality of the roadways within the City. During the 2021 calendar year, the City undertook the measures and projects listed on pages 10-11 to advance the Transportation and CirculationElement:
Summary/Conclusion: The Transportation and Circulation Element in the General Plan is devised and designed to support the Land Use Plan and policies for both current uses and future growth.
The Transportation and Circulation Element has not been amended since its adoption, and the goals, policies, and programs of the element are valid. The Circulation Plan within the element continues to serve to facilitate the implementation of the Land Use Plan, and the assumptions and projections supporting its designations of streets and roadways are accurate and provide a legally adequate and viable plan.
The City’s 2001 General Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) evaluated the City road capacity in 1998, including U.S. Highway 101 that divides the City. When comparing with 2020 traffic counts, there is similarity to numbers from 1998 with no appreciable increase. The 2020 Caltrans traffic counts for U.S. Highway 101 can be found here. https://dot.ca.gov/programs/traffic-operations/census.
PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES ELEMENT
13 City of Crescent City
2021 General Plan and Housing Element Annual Report
Public Facilities and Services Element is an optional General Plan element under California law.
The Public Facilities and Services Element addresses water supply, wastewater treatment, stormwater, solid waste, protection services, and utilities throughout the Crescent City Planning Area. The Public Facilities and Services Element is closely linked both to the Land Use and Community Development Element and the Health and Safety Element.
The Public Facilities and Services Element includes the following goals:
• To ensure the effective and efficient provision of public facilities and services for existing and new development.
• To ensure the availability of an adequate and safe water supply and the maintenance of high-quality water for residents of and visitors to the Crescent City urban area. • To ensure adequate wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal within the Urban Boundary.
• To ensure the safe and efficient disposal or recycling of solid waste generated in Crescent City.
• To collect and convey stormwater in a manner that least inconveniences the public, reduces, or prevents potential water-related damage, and protects the environment. • To provide for the educational needs of Crescent City residents. • To provide police and fire services that protect residents of and visitors to Crescent City from injury and loss of life and to protect property.
• To provide efficient and cost-effective utilities.
These goals contain policies and programs that generally seek to ensure adequate services and public facilities for Crescent City’s existing and projected populations. During the 2021 calendar year, the City undertook the measures and projects listed on pages 10-11 to advance the Public Facilities and Services Element:
Summary/Conclusion: The Public Facilities and Services Element contains standards and guidelines that ensure adequate water supply, wastewater treatment, stormwater, solid waste, protection services, and utilities within the Crescent City planning area. The Public Facilities and Services Element contained within the General Plan has been used by staff and has provided valuable guidance and policy direction for the City. The Public Facilities and Services Element contained within the General Plan is current and accurate and remains useful and legally adequate.
RECREATIONAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES ELEMENT
Recreational and Cultural Resources Element is an optional General Plan element under California law. The Recreation and Cultural Resources Element addresses parks and recreation facilities, trails, coastal zone access, recreation, resources, coastal visual resources, private recreational facilities, and cultural resources throughout the Crescent City Planning Area. The Recreation Element is closely linked both to the Land Use and Community Development Element and to the Natural Resources/ Conservation Element.
The Recreational and Cultural Resources Element of the General Plan includes the following goals:
14 City of Crescent City
2021 General Plan and Housing Element Annual Report
• To encourage the development and maintenance of existing and new parks and recreational facilities to serve the needs of present and future residents, employees, and visitors.
• To develop a system of interconnected hiking, riding, and bicycling trails and paths suitable for active recreation and transportation and circulation. • To provide full coastal recreation opportunities for the public while assuring the protection of important coastal resources and the rights of private property owners. • To provide the full benefits of access to coastal recreation resources to all residents of and visitors to Crescent City.
• The City shall encourage the maintenance of the visual and scenic beauty of Crescent City.
• To encourage development of private recreational facilities to supplement public facilities and to provide for economic development opportunities.
• To encourage identification, protection, and enhancement of Crescent City’s important historical archaeological, paleontological, and cultural sites and activities, and their contributing environment.
Tribal Consultation occurred either formally according to AB 52, or, more often, informally to receive direction on City projects and to gain support for grant application submittals from representative tribes.
These goals contain policies and programs that generally seeks maintain and protect recreation and cultural resources present within the City During the 2021 calendar year, the City undertook the measures and projects listed on pages 10-11 to advance the Recreation and Cultural ResourcesElement:
Summary/Conclusion: The Recreational and Cultural Resources Element contains standards and guidelines that protect existing recreation uses, and new potential recreation uses, all while considering their impacts to residents and resources. The Recreational and Cultural Resources Element contained within the General Plan has been used by staff and has provided valuable guidance and policy direction for the City. The Recreational and Cultural Resources Element contained within the General Plan is current and accurate and remains useful and legally adequate.
NATURAL RESOURCES/ CONSERVATION ELEMENT
A conservation element for the conservation, development and utilization of natural resources including water...soils, rivers...and other natural resources.
The Natural Resources/ Conservation Element addresses marine, water, soils, biological, air, agricultural and timber resources throughout the Crescent City Planning Area. The Natural Resources/ Conservation Element is closely linked both to the Land Use and Community Development Element and to the Recreational and Cultural Resources Element.
The Natural Resources/Conservation Element of the General Plan includes the following goals:
• To maintain and where possible enhance marine resources, coastal waters, and sensitive 15 City of Crescent City
2021 General Plan and Housing Element Annual Report
coastal habitats, thereby recognizing the economic and biologic significance of these resources.
• To protect and enhance the natural qualities of Crescent City’s streams, creeks, and groundwater and to ensure sufficient water supplies of good quality for all beneficial uses. • To maintain the productivity of soils, reduce erosion, and prevent unsafe and unhealthy soil conditions within the Crescent City Planning Area. • To protect, restore, and enhance wildlife habitat that support fish and wildlife species throughout the Crescent City Planning Area.
• To protect and improve air quality in Crescent City and the region. • To promote the development of agricultural uses that support the continued viability of agricultural activities in the Crescent City Planning Area. • To conserve forest resources, enhance the quality and diversity of forest ecosystems, reduce conflicts between forestry and other uses, and to encourage a continued yield of forest products in the Planning Area.
These goals contain policies and programs that generally seek to protect the natural resources present within the Crescent City Planning Area. During the 2021 calendar year, the City undertook the measures and projects listed on pages 10-11 to advance the Natural Resources/ConservationElement:
Summary/Conclusion: The Natural Resources/ Conservation Element remains useful and relevant and have served the City over the last year. The element has not been amended since its adoption, and the goals, policies, and programs of the element remain valid.
HEALTH AND SAFETY ELEMENT
A safety element for the protection of the community from any unreasonable risks associated with the effects of […earthquakes, dam failures, subsidence, liquefaction, and other known geologic hazards]. It shall also address evacuation routes, peak load water supply requirements...
The Health and Safety Element of the Crescent City General Plan lists the following goals:
• To protect the public health, safety, and welfare and minimize the damage to structures, property, and infrastructure as a result of seismic, geologic, fire, and flood hazards. • To minimize the loss of life, injury, and property damage due to seismic hazards. • To minimize the loss of life, injury, and property damage due to geological hazards. • To protect the lives and property of the citizens of Crescent City from hazards associated with development in floodplains.
• To prevent and minimize the risk of loss of life, injury, and property damage resulting from unwanted fires.
• To minimize the risk of loss of life, injury, serious illness, damage to property, and economic and social dislocations resulting from the use, transport, treatment, and disposal of hazardous materials and hazardous material wastes.
• To provide planning, response, and recovery capabilities to deal with the range of natural and manmade hazards that could impact the Crescent City Planning Area. • To prevent incompatible land uses, by reason of excessive noise level, from occurring in the future. This includes protecting sensitive land uses from exposure to excessive noise and to protect the economic base of the city by preventing the encroachment of 16 City of Crescent City
2021 General Plan and Housing Element Annual Report
incompatible land uses within areas affected by existing or planned noise-producing uses.
These goals contain policies and programs that aim to protect Crescent City’s existing and projected populations from natural and manmade hazards. During the 2021 calendar year, the City undertook the measures and projects listed on pages 10-11 to advance the Health and Safety Element:
Summary/Conclusion: The Health and Safety Element contains information and goals, policies, and programs regarding general, seismic, geologic, flood, and fire hazards, as well as hazardous materials, disaster planning, and noise. This element has not been amended since its adoption.
DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY 2021
In 2021, the City of Crescent City Planning Department has provided guidance to the city on Accessory Dwelling Units Ordinance, Cannabis Ordinance and Applications, Lot Merger and Subdivision process, Coastal Development Permits, and approved several new permit application instructions, updated processing timeline, and updated staff reports. The table below shows a summary of planning service requests submitted in 2021.
Planning Services – 2021
Planning Service Type # of
Submittals
Status
(Approved, Pending)
Planning Inquiries 179 N/A
Ordinances 2 Approved/Hold
Sign Permits 12 Approved
Business License Referrals 50 Approved
Building Permit Referrals 49 Approved
Site Plan / Architectural Review 11 Approved
Use Permits 4 Approved
Cannabis Use Permits 6 Approved
Coastal Development Permits 1 Pending
Variance Permits 0 N/A
Burn Letters 2 Approved
City Projects 2 Approved
General Plan Amendment 0 N/A
Zoning Ord. / Zoning Map Amendment 0 N/A
Lot Merger 0 N/A
Lot Split 0 N/A
Parcel Map 0 N/A
Subdivision Map 0 N/A
Annexation 0 N/A
Property Line Adjustment 0 N/A
Other 0 N/A
Summary
As indicated previously in this report, the City of Crescent City General Plan has in the past and currently provides meaningful direction to elected officials, City staff, landowners, citizens, and 17 City of Crescent City
2021 General Plan and Housing Element Annual Report
parties interested in the future of Crescent City. Through the end of calendar year 2021, the General Plan remained essentially unchanged in its direction and policy foundations from the time of its adoption in 2001. There were no changes to the General Plan’s goals, policies, and programs during 2021.
The City’s General Plan is not needing a comprehensive update. The current General Plan continues to provide accurate and useful policy guidance for the City. The document is adequate and functional, and succeeds in meeting its own goals, policies, and programs and in serving the needs of the City of Crescent City.
18 City of Crescent City
2021 General Plan and Housing Element Annual Report
REFERENCES
1. City of Crescent City. City of Crescent City General Plan (2001).
2. 2021 City of Crescent City Planning Department Application Processing Log and Activity Reports.
3. City of Crescent City. City of Crescent City General Plan 2014–2029 HousingElement.
4. California Department of Finance, Report P-1, December 2014.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
TO: MAYOR GREENOUGH AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ERIC WIER, CITY MANAGER
BY: JON OLSON, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
LINDA LEAVER, FINANCE DIRECTOR
MARTHA D. RICE, CITY ATTORNEY
DATE: JUNE 20, 2022
SUBJECT: JOHNSON CONTROLS AGREEMENT FOR POOL RENOVATION ______________________________________________________________________
RECOMMENDATION
• Hear staff report
• Technical questions from the Council
• Receive public comment
• Further Council discussion
• Approve and authorize the City Manager to sign the Agreement for Fred Endert Municipal Pool Building Improvements with Johnson Controls for the renovation of the Fred Endert Municipal Swimming Pool HVAC and other systems.
BACKGROUND
Johnson Controls, Inc. (JCI) performed an energy efficiency audit and has proposed projects that will increase efficiency, reduce costs, and improve the pool environment.
The energy audit (Phase 1) was completed in 2021 and was at no cost to the City. As presented to the Council on February 1, 2021 the Phase 1 energy audit is a preliminary City-wide analysis and project feasibility study which resulted in the evaluation of several potential energy saving projects across all City funds including Water, Sewer, and General Funds. Through this discovery phase many potential energy projects were deemed unfeasible based on the City’s current infrastructure and energy efficiency incentive options. However, several projects in various City funds were identified as potentially feasible. The City Council directed staff to move into Phase 2 for a pool project on June 21, 2021.
Johnson Controls presented recommended pool projects at several workshops and public meetings and most recently to the City Council and Measure S Oversight Committee at the March 15, 2022 City priorities workshop. At that workshop, JCI presented a project with several components, including replacing the boilers (which are past their useful life and already in need of replacement), new motor and variable speed drive on the
FRED ENDERT MUNICIPAL POOL BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS
June 20, 2022
2 circulation pump, the addition of dehumidifier units, improving the building envelope, and improvements to the spa including new blanket cover, new on/off switch with timer for the pump, and new heat exchanger. Both the Measure S Oversight Committee and the City Council were in favor of moving forward with the project.
City Council directed staff to review Johnson Controls’ scope and guaranteed price. Staff have negotiated with Johnson Controls, reviewed alternative equipment, and are recommending award of contract based on the reasonableness of the cost, timing of the project, and economic uncertainties like inflation and supply chain delays or complications.
Johnson Controls developed plans and construction cost estimates for the recommended pool project which includes pump motor upgrades including energy saving variable frequency drives, pool building dehumidification, boiler and water tank replacements, and overall system controls and programming upgrades. Johnson Controls bid the project on December 14, 2021, and received bids on December 29, 2021.
If the City Council chooses to proceed with the project, Johnson Controls will begin purchasing equipment and engaging sub-contractors as needed to complete the proposed upgrades. If Council chooses not to move ahead with the project, City staff will still need to make arrangements to (at a minimum) replace the pool boiler system in the foreseeable future.
ITEM ANALYSIS
Over the past several years, City staff have worked with Johnson Controls to evaluate various proposed pool projects. Through this process several pool projects were eliminated, like solar power, based on overall feasibility or a determination that a different approach would be in the City’s best interest. The project presented for Council consideration this evening will improve efficiency with the installation of new higher efficiency boilers, new motor and variable speed drive for circulation pump, new spa cover, new spa pump switch and timer, new spa heat exchanger, and building envelope repairs. These improvements will allow the pool, spa, and interior building heat system to operate more efficiently with less variability.
The installation of dehumidifiers will both assist in creating a more efficient performance for the pool, spa, and interior heat by maintaining a consistent level of humidity. The reduction of interior humidity will be a huge improvement to the pool environment for both patrons and employees. High humidity intensifies the effect of air temperature (cold feels colder and hot feel hotter). Thus, when the humidity is reduced and kept at a consistent level, less variation is required to maintain satisfactory interior air and pool temperatures.
Overall, the dehumidification system will improve the comfort level and operations and reduce maintenance needs of the building. The current levels of humidity in the building increase the need for maintenance as the constant high levels of moisture increase the rate of deterioration of building materials and lead to the presence of mold, which increases the need for cleaning.
FRED ENDERT MUNICIPAL POOL BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS
June 20, 2022
3 The services to be provided under the agreement were not competitively procured by the City. They were, however, competitively procured by Sourcewell, a service cooperative created by the Minnesota legislature as a local unit of government. Sourcewell pre-bids a wide variety of goods and services and then offers those deals to units of government across the country (cities, counties, states, school districts, special districts, etc.).
California public entities can join Sourcewell and take advantage of its contracts under the California Joint Exercise of Powers Act (Gov. Code § 6500 et seq.). Johnson Controls has been awarded a Sourcewell contract for the HVAC and related systems. The City is a Sourcewell member and is therefore authorized to enter into an agreement for the purchase and installation/construction of the aforementioned building improvements.
This proposed pool HVAC project has a guaranteed maximum price of $1.1 million. Due to the current rate of inflation, however, Johnson Controls may not be able to hold this price much longer.
The project is anticipated to begin this winter with the exact construction commencement date and pool closure being dependent on equipment lead times. The project is anticipated to be completed within 90 days of construction commencement.
FISCAL ANALYSIS
The Measure S Oversight Committee recommended funding $516,233 of this project with Measure S funds, and the Council adopted that recommendation on Resolution 2022-35.
The remaining funding, per Council direction, will come from the City’s ARPA funds, to be included in the FY 22-23 budget presented to the Council tonight in another agenda item.
Funding Source
Measure S $ 516,233
ARPA $ 670,158
Total $ 1,186,391
The JCI proposed contract is $1,100,000, leaving a small contingency of $86,391 for minor issues that may arise. Because of the guaranteed maximum price provided by JCI, no additional contingency is recommended at this time. If this contract is approved, the City will need to pay JCI’s pre construction engineering costs in the amount of $100,000 upon issuing notice to proceed, with the remaining amounts billed as monthly progress payments.
STRATEGIC PLAN ASSESSMENT
This action supports the following Strategic Plan Goals • 1: Support quality services, community safety, and health to enhance the quality of life and experience of our residents and visitors
FRED ENDERT MUNICIPAL POOL BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS
June 20, 2022
4 • 1(D): Provide and maintain an efficient, adequate infrastructure to provide for both current and future community needs
• 3(E): Define strategies to reconstruct or improve all outdated City facilities
ATTACHMENTS
• Agreement for Crescent City Municipal Pool Building Improvements Johnson Controls, Inc. – Proprietary
© 2022 Johnson Controls, Inc. 1
AGREEMENT FOR FRED ENDERT MUNICIPAL POOL
BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS
This Agreement for Fred Endert Municipal Pool Building Improvements (this “Agreement”) is made this ___ day of June 2022 between:
PARTIES
Johnson Controls, Inc. (“JCI”)
103 Woodmere Rd. Suite 110
Folsom, CA 95630
And
City of Crescent City (“Customer”)
377 J Street
Crescent City, CA 95531
RECITALS
WHEREAS, Customer is the owner of the Fred Endert Municipal Pool located at 1000 Play Street, Crescent city California; and
WHEREAS, Customer desires to retain JCI to perform the work specified in Schedule 1 (Scope of Work) hereto (the “Work”) relating to the purchase and installation of the improvement measures (the “Improvement Measures”) described therein; and
WHEREAS, Customer is authorized and empowered under the California Joint Exercise of Powers Act (Gov.
Code Section 6500 et seq.) and Crescent City Municipal Code Section 14.28.030, to enter into this Agreement by way of its joining Sourcewell, a service cooperative created by the Minnesota legislature as a local unit of government; and
WHEREAS, Sourcewell conducts competitive procurements which can be utilized nationwide by cities, counties, school districts, states and other units of government; and WHEREAS, this Agreement is in entered pursuant to and accordance with Sourcewell Contract # 070121- JHN.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
AGREEMENT
1. SCOPE OF THE AGREEMENT. JCI shall perform the Work set forth in Schedule 1. Customer shall make payments to JCI for the Work in accordance with Schedule 4 (Price and Payment Terms).
2. AGREEMENT DOCUMENTS. In addition to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the following Schedules are incorporated into and shall be deemed an integral part of this Agreement:
Schedule 1 – Scope of Work
Schedule 2 – Not Used
Schedule 3 – Customer Responsibilities
Schedule 4 – Price and Payment Terms
3. NOTICE TO PROCEED; SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION. This Agreement shall become effective on the date of the last signature on the signature page below. JCI shall commence performance of the Work within ten (10) business days of receipt of Customer’s Notice to Proceed, a form of which is attached hereto as Attachment 1 Johnson Controls, Inc. – Proprietary
© 2022 Johnson Controls, Inc. 2
and shall achieve Substantial Completion of the Work by the Substantial Completion date by the target date of June 30, 2023.
For purposes of this Agreement, “Substantial Completion” means that JCI has provided sufficient materials and services to permit the Customer to operate the Improvement Measures.
4. DELAYS AND IMPACTS. If JCI is delayed or impacted in the commencement, performance, or completion of the Work by causes beyond its control and without its fault, including but not limited to inability to access property; concealed or unknown conditions encountered at the project, differing from the conditions represented by Customer in the bid documents or otherwise disclosed by Customer to JCI prior to the commencement of the Work; a Force Majeure Event (as defined below) condition; failure by Customer to perform its obligations under this Agreement; or failure by Customer to cooperate with JCI in the timely completion of the Work, JCI shall provide written notice to Customer of the existence, extent of, and reason for such delays and impacts.
Under such circumstances, an equitable adjustment in the time for performance, price, scope, and payment terms shall be made.
5. ACCESS. Customer shall provide JCI, its subcontractors, and its agents reasonable and safe access to all facilities and properties in Customer’s control that are subject to the Work. The Customer further agrees to assist JCI, its subcontractors, and its agents to gain access to facilities and properties that are not controlled by Customer but are necessary for JCI to complete the Work. An equitable adjustment in the time for performance, price and payment terms shall be made as a result of any failure to grant such access.
6. PERMITS, TAXES, AND FEES. Unless otherwise specified in Schedule 3 (Customer Responsibilities), JCI shall be responsible for obtaining all building permits required for it to perform the Work. JCI will also be required to obtain a City business license. Unless otherwise specified in Schedule 1 (Scope of Work), Customer shall be responsible for obtaining all other permits, licenses, approvals, permissions, and certifications, including but not limited to, all zoning and land-use changes or exceptions required for the provision of the Work or the ownership and use of the Improvement Measures. JCI shall not be obligated to provide any changes to or improvement of the facilities or any portion thereof required under any applicable building, fire, safety, sprinkler or other applicable code, standard, law, regulation, ordinance or other requirement unless the same expressly regulates the installation of the Improvement Measures. Without limiting the foregoing, JCI’s obligations with respect to the Work are not intended to encompass any changes or improvements that relate to any compliance matters (whether known or unknown) that are not directly related to the installation of the Improvement Measures or which have been imposed or enforced because of the occasion or opportunity of review by any governmental authority. Customer shall be responsible for and shall pay when due all assessments, charges, and sales, use, property, excise, or other taxes now or hereafter imposed by any governmental body or agency upon the provision of the Work, implementation, or presence of the Improvement Measures, the use of the Improvement Measures or payments due to JCI under this Agreement, other than taxes upon the net income of JCI. Customer shall also be responsible for real or personal property taxes relating to equipment or material included in the Improvement Measures. Any fees, taxes, or other lawful charges paid by JCI on account of Customer shall become immediately due from Customer to JCI.
7. WARRANTY. JCI will perform the Work in a professional, workman-like manner. JCI will promptly re-perform any non-conforming Work for no charge, as long as Customer provides written notice to JCI within one (1) year following Substantial Completion or such other period identified in Schedule 1. If JCI installs or furnishes goods or equipment under this Agreement, and such goods or equipment are covered by an end-user warranty from their manufacturer, JCI will transfer the benefits of such warranty to Customer. The foregoing remedy with respect to the Work, together with any remedy provided by goods or equipment manufacturers, shall be Customer’s sole and exclusive remedies for warranty claims. Customer agrees that the one (1) year period following Substantial Completion, or such other period identified in Schedule 1, shall be a reasonable time for purposes of submitting valid warranty claims with respect to the Work. These exclusive remedies shall not have failed of their essential purpose so long as JCI transfers the benefits of any goods or equipment end-user warranty to Customer and remains willing to re-perform any non-conforming Work for no charge within the one (1) year period described above or such other period identified in Schedule 1. NO OTHER EXPRESS OR Johnson Controls, Inc. – Proprietary
© 2022 Johnson Controls, Inc. 3
IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, ARE PROVIDED BY JCI. JCI does not guarantee that any Improvement Measures will perform in accordance with the manufacturer’s specifications over the term of this Agreement, other than with respect to the limited warranty applicable to equipment actually manufactured by JCI, or if the performance failure is related to JCI’s workmanship, each as described above. The Customer’s sole remedy for failed or non-performing Improvement Measures not related to JCI’s workmanship is to pursue claims under any manufacturer’s warranty claims than in effect. This warranty does not extend to any Work that has been abused, altered, misused, or repaired by Customer or third parties without the supervision or prior written approval of JCI. Except with respect to goods or equipment manufactured by JCI and furnished to Customer hereunder, for which JCI shall provide its express written manufacturer’s warranty, JCI shall not be considered a merchant or vendor of goods or equipment.
8. CLEANUP. JCI shall keep the premises and the surrounding area free from accumulation of waste materials or rubbish caused by the Work and, upon completion of the Work, JCI shall remove all waste materials, rubbish, tools, construction equipment, machinery, and surplus materials.
9. SAFETY; COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS. JCI shall be responsible for initiating, maintaining, and supervising all safety precautions and programs in connection with the performance of the Work. Each of JCI and Customer shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, rules, regulations, and lawful orders of public authorities (collectively, “Laws”) in connection with its performance hereunder.
10. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS.
A. JCI shall be responsible for removing or disposing of any JCI Hazardous Materials and for the remediation of any areas to the extent impacted by the release of JCI Hazardous Materials. For any Non-JCI Hazardous Materials, Customer shall supply JCI with any information in its possession relating to the presence of such materials if their presence may affect JCI’s performance of the Work. It is JCI’s policy to seek certification for facilities constructed prior to 1982 that no asbestos-containing materials are present, and Customer shall at its own cost and expense provide such certification for buildings it owns or aid JCI in obtaining such certification from facility owners in the case of buildings that Customer does not own if JCI will undertake Work in the facility that could disturb such asbestos-containing materials. If Customer becomes aware of or suspects the presence of Non-JCI Hazardous Materials that may interfere with Work, it will immediately provide notice to JCI. Upon such notice, or if JCI becomes aware of or suspects the presence of Non-JCI Hazardous Materials that may interfere with Work, JCI shall promptly stop the Work in the affected area. As between Customer and JCI, Customer shall be responsible at its sole expense for removing and disposing of Non-JCI Hazardous Materials from its facilities and the remediation of any areas impacted by the release of Non-JCI Hazardous Materials in conformance with all applicable Laws and addressing the impact of its disturbance before JCI continues with its Work.
B. To the fullest extent permitted by Law, Customer shall indemnify and hold harmless JCI and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, shareholders, affiliates, and successors and assigns, from and against any and all losses, costs, damages, expenses (including reasonable legal fees and defense costs), claims, causes of action or liability, directly or indirectly, relating to or arising from Customer’s negligent use, storage, release, discharge, handling or presence of Non-JCI Hazardous Materials (actual or alleged and regardless of the cause of such condition) on, under or about the facilities, or Customer’s failure to comply with this Article 10.
C. Definitions Applicable to this Article 10:
i. “Hazardous Materials” – Hazardous Materials are any material or substance that, whether by its nature or use, is now or hereafter defined or regulated as a hazardous waste, hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant under applicable Laws relating to or addressing public or employee health and safety and protection of the environment, or which is toxic, explosive, corrosive, flammable, radioactive, carcinogenic, mutagenic or otherwise hazardous or which is or contains petroleum, gasoline, diesel, Johnson Controls, Inc. – Proprietary
© 2022 Johnson Controls, Inc. 4
fuel, another petroleum hydrocarbon product, or polychlorinated biphenyls. Hazardous Materials specifically include without limitation mold, lead-based paint, and asbestos-containing materials. ii. “JCI Hazardous Materials” – JCI Hazardous Materials are any Hazardous Materials brought onto Customer’s premises by JCI in providing the Work.
iii. “Non-JCI Hazardous Materials” – Non-JCI Hazardous Materials are any Hazardous Materials located on, about, or under Customer’s premises, other than JCI Hazardous Materials.
11. CHANGE ORDERS. The parties, without invalidating this Agreement, may request changes in the Work to be performed under this Agreement, consisting of additions, deletions, or other revisions to the Work (“Change Orders”). The price and payment terms, time for performance shall be equitably adjusted in accordance with the Change Order. Such adjustments shall be determined by mutual agreement of the parties. JCI may delay performance until adjustments arising out of the Change Order are clarified and agreed upon. Any Change Order must be signed by an authorized representative of each party. If concealed or unknown conditions are encountered at the project, differing from the conditions represented by Customer in the bid documents or otherwise disclosed by Customer to JCI prior to the commencement of the Work, price and payment terms, time for performance shall be equitably adjusted. Claims for equitable adjustment may be asserted in writing within a reasonable time from the date a party becomes aware of a change to the Work by written notification.
Failure to promptly assert a request for equitable adjustment, however, shall not constitute a waiver of any rights to seek any equitable adjustment with respect to such change.
12. CUSTOMER FINANCING; TREATMENT; TAXES. The parties acknowledge and agree that JCI is not making any representation or warranty to Customer with respect to matters not expressly addressed in this Agreement, including, but not limited to:
a. Customer’s ability to obtain or make payments on any financing associated with paying for the Improvement Measures, related services, or otherwise;
b. Customer’s proper legal, tax, accounting, or credit rating agency treatment relating to this Agreement; and
c. the necessity of Customer to raise taxes or seek additional funding for any purpose.
Customer is solely responsible for its obligations and determinations with respect to the foregoing matters. In addition, the parties acknowledge and agree that Customer shall be responsible to comply, at its cost and expense, with all Laws that may be applicable to it relating to contracting, including, without limitation, any requirements relating to the procurement of goods and/or services and any legal, accounting, or engineering opinions or reviews required or obtained in connection with this Agreement.
13. INSURANCE.
a. JCI shall maintain insurance in the 7amounts set forth below in full force and effect at all times until the Work has been completed and shall provide a certificate evidencing such coverage promptly following Customer’s request therefor.
COVERAGES: LIMITS OF LIABILITY:
Workmen's Compensation Insurance or self-insurance,
Employer's Liability
Applicable Statutory Limits
$1,000,000 Per Accident for Bodily
Injury or Disease
Commercial General Liability Insurance, including products and completed operations, property damage, bodily injury and personal and advertising injury
$5,000,000 Per Occurrence
$5,000,000 Aggregate
Comprehensive Automobile Liability Insurance, any auto $5,000,000 Combined Single Limit Johnson Controls, Inc. – Proprietary
© 2022 Johnson Controls, Inc. 5
Professional Liability $2,000,000 Each Claim
$2,000,000 Aggregate
b. The above limits may be obtained through primary and excess policies and may be subject to self-ensured retentions.
c. Customer shall be responsible for obtaining builder's risk insurance coverage for the Improvement Measures and shall at all times be responsible for any loss or casualty to the Improvement Measures.
Customer shall also maintain insurance coverage, of the types and in the amounts customary for the conduct of its business, throughout the term of this Agreement. d. The Customer, its elected and appointed officials, employees, agents and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds on the CGL policy with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of JCI including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations and automobiles owned, leased hired, or borrowed by or on behalf of JCI but only to the extent of the negligence of JCI. General liability coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to JCI’s insurance.
e. For any claims related to this project, JCI’s insurance coverage shall be primary insurance coverage at least as broad as ISO CG 2001 10 04 13 as respects Customer, its appointed and elected officials, employees, agents and volunteers. Ay insurance or self-insurance maintained by Customer, its appointed and elected officials, employees, agents, or volunteers shall be excess of JCI’s insurance and shall not contribute to it.
f. JCI shall provide notice to Customer prior to any insurance policy required herein being canceled. g. Insurance is to be placed with insurers authorized to conduct business in California with a current A.M.
Best rating of no less than A VII, unless otherwise expressly approved by Customer. h. JCI agrees to waive rights of subrogation which any insurer of JCI may acquired from JCI by virtue of the payment of any loss under the Commercial General Liability and Comprehensive Automobile Liability policies. JCI agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation.
The Workers’ Compensation policy must be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation in favor of the Customer for all work performed by JCI, it employees, agents, and subcontractors.
14. BONDS. JCI must furnish both a payment bond and a faithful performance bond, each in in an amount equal to the full contract price. The form of each bond shall be as provided in Exhibits A and B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
15. PREVAILING WAGES. JCI employees and all subcontractors engaged on this project shall be compensated at or above the current prevailing wage rate determination issued by the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR). Prevailing wage rates may be obtained from the DIR website. Copies of the applicable prevailing wage rates must be posted at the work site. Compliance with Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code, dealing with the employment of properly registered apprentices in all applicable occupations involved in the construction of this project, shall remain the responsibility of JCI. No apprentice may be placed on the job without prior submission of apprenticeship registration, allowable pay rates and approval of Customer’s Representative. Failure to obtain prior approval will require payment of journeyman wages until approval is received. All apprentices must be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations.
16. LABOR STANDARDS.
a. Hours of Labor. Pursuant to the California Labor Code, eight hours of labor constitutes a legal day's work.
JCI or its subcontractors may not require any more than eight hours of labor in a day from any person employed in the performance of the work under this contract. Failure of JCI to perform the work in accordance with this policy of the State of California is a failure on his part to comply with the provisions of this Agreement.
Johnson Controls, Inc. – Proprietary
© 2022 Johnson Controls, Inc. 6
b. Overtime Work. Overtime and shift work may be established as a regular procedure by JCI or a subcontractor with reasonable notice and written permission of the Customer. No work other than overtime and shift work established as a regular procedure will be performed between the hours of 6:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. nor on Saturdays, Sundays or holidays except such work as is necessary for the proper care and protection of the work already performed or in case of an emergency. All work over eight hours per day and/or 40 hours per week is considered overtime. Hours over 8 in a day and/or 40 hours in a week must be paid at 1.5 times the rate of regular hours. Double time is required and due for work beyond 12 hours in a workday or eight hours on the seventh day of a work week. c. Travel and Subsistence Pay. JCI and its subcontractors must comply with the requirements of Section 1773.8 of the Labor Code in the payment of travel and subsistence payments to each workman needed to execute the work, as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreements filed in accordance with Section 1773.8.
17. ANTI-LOBBYING CERTIFICATION. JCI must execute and deliver an anti-lobbying certification as required by 2 CFR 200, Appendix II and 31 USC 1352 (the “Byrd Anti-Lobbying Amendment”). The form of certification is attached hereto and Exhibit C and incorporated herein by this reference.
18. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY.
a. The Civil Rights, Housing and Community Development, and Age Discrimination Act Assurances:
JCI, its subcontractors, manufacturers and suppliers assure that no otherwise qualified person will be excluded from participation or employment, denied program benefits, or be subjected to discrimination based on race, color, national origin, sex, age, handicap, religion, familial status, or religious preference, under any grant activity funded by this Agreement, as required by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, the Fair Housing Amendment Act of 1988, and all implementing regulations. b. Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the “504 Coordinator”: JCI, its subcontractors, manufacturers, and suppliers further agree to implement the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and its regulations, 24 CFR Part 8, including, but not limited to, for contractors, subcontractors, manufacturers, and suppliers with fifteen (15) or more permanent full or part time employees, the local designation for a specific person charged with local enforcement of this Act, as the “504 Coordinator.” c. Assurance of Compliance with Requirements Placed on Construction Contracts of $10,000 or more: JCI hereby agrees to place in every contract and subcontract for construction exceeding $10,000 the Notice of Requirement for Affirmative Action to ensure Equal Employment Opportunity (Executive Order 11246), the Standard Equal Employment Opportunity, and the Construction Contract Specifications.