Daly City City Council
October 28, 2024

22 SINGLE-FAMILY AND MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS City of Daly City 3. Objective Design Standards for Multi-Family Residential Developments

3.  Objective Design Standards for
Multifamily Residential Developments

3.1.1.2 Minimum Frontage Length
» ƚůĞĂƐƚϴϱƉĞƌĐĞŶƚŽĨƚŚĞƚŽƚĂůďƵŝůĚŝŶŐĨĂĕĂĚĞ
ůĞŶŐƚŚƐŚĂůůďĞůŽĐĂƚĞĚŽŶŽƌǁŝƚŚŝŶϭϬĨĞĞƚŽĨƚŚĞ
ĨƌŽŶƚŽƌƐƚƌĞĞƚͲƐŝĚĞLJĂƌĚƐĞƚďĂĐŬůŝŶĞ͘'ƌŽƵŶĚͲůĞǀĞů
ƉƵďůŝĐůLJĂĐĐĞƐƐŝďůĞŽƉĞŶƐƉĂĐĞŽƌŚĂďŝƚĂďůĞŽƉĞŶ
ƐƉĂĐĞŽŶĂƉŽĚŝƵŵĂďŽǀĞƚŚĞŐƌŽƵŶĚůĞǀĞůĐŽƵůĚ
ŵĂŬĞƵƉϱϬƉĞƌĐĞŶƚŽĨƚŚŝƐƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚĨƌŽŶƚĨĂĕĂĚĞ͘
DƵůƟĨĂŵŝůLJĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƐĂƌĞŵĂĚĞƵƉŽĨĂƌĂŶŐĞŽĨ
ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƚLJƉĞƐ͕ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐƚƌŝƉůĞdž͕ƋƵĂĚƌƵƉůĞdž͕ĐŽƩĂŐĞ
ĐŽƵƌƚͲƚLJƉĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƐ͕ĐŽŶĚŽŵŝŶŝƵŵƐ͕ĂƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚ
ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐ͕ĂŶĚŵƵůƟƉůĞͲďƵŝůĚŝŶŐĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƐ͘dŚĞ
ĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐĂƉƉůLJƚŽĂůůŵƵůƟĨĂŵŝůLJƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐŝŶ ĂŶLJnjŽŶŝŶŐĚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ͘

3.1 Site Design

3.1.1  Building-Street Edge
Intent

ŶƐƵƌĞƚŚĂƚŶĞǁŵƵůƟĨĂŵŝůLJĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ
ƉƌŽŵŽƚĞƐĂƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶͲĨƌŝĞŶĚůLJĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂŶĚ
ƌĞƐƉŽŶĚƐƚŽƐƵƌƌŽƵŶĚŝŶŐƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂůĚĞƐŝŐŶ͘

3.1.1.1 Building Orientation
» dŚĞŵĂŝŶĞůĞǀĂƟŽŶŽĨĂůůŶĞǁďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐƐŚĂůůďĞ
ŽƌŝĞŶƚĞĚƚŽĨĂĐĞƚŚĞƉƵďůŝĐŽƌƉƌŝǀĂƚĞƐƚƌĞĞƚŽŶǁŚŝĐŚ ƚŚĞůŽƚŝƐůŽĐĂƚĞĚ͘
» tŚĞƌĞĂƐŝŶŐůĞďƵŝůĚŝŶŐĞŶƚƌĂŶĐĞƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐĂĐĐĞƐƐƚŽ
ŵƵůƟƉůĞŝŶƚĞƌŝŽƌƵŶŝƚƐ͕ƚŚĂƚĞdžƚĞƌŶĂůĞŶƚƌĂŶĐĞƐŚĂůů
ďĞůŽĐĂƚĞĚŽŶƚŚĞĞůĞǀĂƟŽŶĨĂĐŝŶŐƚŚĞƐƚƌĞĞƚ͘
» tŚĞƌĞŚŽƵƐŝŶŐƵŶŝƚƐŚĂǀĞŝŶĚŝǀŝĚƵĂůĞdžƚĞƌŝŽƌ
ĞŶƚƌĂŶĐĞƐĂŶĚĂƌĞĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚƚŽĂƉƵďůŝĐƐƚƌĞĞƚ͕ĂƚůĞĂƐƚ ŽŶĞĞŶƚƌLJƐŚĂůůĨĂĐĞƚŚĞƐƚƌĞĞƚ͘
» ŽƌŶĞƌďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐƐŚĂůůŝŶĐůƵĚĞĂƚůĞĂƐƚŽŶĞĞŶƚƌLJĂŶĚ ĚŝƌĞĐƚƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĂĐĐĞƐƐĨƌŽŵďŽƚŚƐƚƌĞĞƚĨƌŽŶƚĂŐĞƐ͘
» dǁŽĞdžĐĞƉƟŽŶƐŵĂLJďĞŵĂĚĞ͗
»
džĐĞƉƟŽŶϭ͗
ŶƚƌŝĞƐŵĂLJĨƌŽŶƚĂĐŽƵƌƚLJĂƌĚƚŚĂƚŝƐ
ĚŝƌĞĐƚůLJĂĐĐĞƐƐŝďůĞĨƌŽŵƉƌŝŵĂƌLJƐƚƌĞĞƚǀŝĂƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶ ƉĂƚŚ͘
»
džĐĞƉƟŽŶϮ͗ƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐŽĨŵƵůƟďƵŝůĚŝŶŐĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƐ
ŽƚŚĞƌƚŚĂŶƚŚĞďƵŝůĚŝŶŐĐůŽƐĞƐƚƚŽƉƌŝŵĂƌLJƐƚƌĞĞƚ
ŵĂLJŝŶĐůƵĚĞŽīͲƐƚƌĞĞƚͬŝŶƚĞƌŝŽƌĂĐĐĞƐƐĨƌŽŵƉƌŝǀĂƚĞ
ƐƚƌĞĞƚƐ͘
DŝŶŝŵƵŵ&ƌŽŶƚĂŐĞ>ĞŶŐƚŚ

3.1.1.3 Entryway Access Walkway
» ŵŝŶŝŵƵŵƐŝdžͲĨŽŽƚͲǁŝĚĞǁĂůŬǁĂLJƐŚĂůůƉƌŽǀŝĚĞ
ĚŝƌĞĐƚĂĐĐĞƐƐĨƌŽŵƚŚĞƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬƚŽĂůůĐŽŵďŝŶĞĚ͕
ŵƵůƟͲƵŶŝƚĞŶƚƌLJǁĂLJƐ͘
» ŵŝŶŝŵƵŵĨŽƵƌͲĨŽŽƚͲǁŝĚĞǁĂůŬǁĂLJƐŚĂůůƉƌŽǀŝĚĞ
ĚŝƌĞĐƚĂĐĐĞƐƐĨƌŽŵƚŚĞƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬƚŽĂůůŝŶĚŝǀŝĚƵĂůƵŶŝƚ ĞŶƚƌĂŶĐĞƐ͘

3.1.1.4 Corner Buildings
KŶĂĐŽƌŶĞƌůŽƚ͕ĂďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐŚĂůůďĞƐŝƚĞĚŶŽŵŽƌĞƚŚĂŶ ϭϬĨĞĞƚĨƌŽŵĞŝƚŚĞƌĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚƐƚƌĞĞƚƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJůŝŶĞĨŽƌĂ ŵŝŶŝŵƵŵĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞŽĨϮϱĨĞĞƚƚŽŚĞůƉĚĞĮŶĞƚŚĞĐŽƌŶĞƌƐ
ŽĨƐƚƌĞĞƚďůŽĐŬƐƵŶůĞƐƐŝƚƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐĂŶĂƩƌĂĐƟǀĞŽƉĞŶ
ƐƉĂĐĞƚŚĂƚƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐĚŝƌĞĐƚŝŶƚĞƌŶĂůĂĐĐĞƐƐƚŽƵŶŝƚƐ͘

SINGLE-FAMILY AND MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS 23 City of Daly City 3. Objective Design Standards for Multi-Family Residential Developments ŽƌŶĞƌďƵŝůĚŝŶŐǁŝƚŚůĂŶĚƐĐĂƉŝŶŐĂŶĚďƵŝůĚŝŶŐĞŶƚƌLJĨĂĐŝŶŐ ƚŚĞƐƚƌĞĞƚ͘
Corner Element
hŶŝƚƐŽŶĐŽƌŶĞƌůŽƚƐƐŚĂůůŝŶĐŽƌƉŽƌĂƚĞĂƚůĞĂƐƚƚǁŽŽĨ ƚŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐĚĞƐŝŐŶĚĞƚĂŝůĞŶŚĂŶĐĞŵĞŶƚƐ͗
» ZŽƵŶĚĞĚŽƌĂŶŐůĞĚĨĂĐĞƚŽŶƚŚĞĐŽƌŶĞƌ ͘
» >ŽĐĂƟŽŶŽĨƚŚĞďƵŝůĚŝŶŐĞŶƚƌĂŶĐĞĂƚƚŚĞĐŽƌŶĞƌ ͘
» ĐŚĂŶŐĞŝŶŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůĨŽƌĂŵŝŶŝŵƵŵŽĨϮϱĨĞĞƚŽŶ
ďŽƚŚƐŝĚĞƐŽĨƚŚĞƐƚƌĞĞƚ͘
» Landscaped open space.
»
ŵďĞĚĚĞĚĐŽƌŶĞƌƚŽǁĞƌĞůĞŵĞŶƚĨŽƌĂŵŝŶŝŵƵŵ
ŽĨϱϬƉĞƌĐĞŶƚŽĨďŽƚŚĨĂĕĂĚĞůĞŶŐƚŚƐŽƌϮϱĨĞĞƚ͕
ǁŚŝĐŚĞǀĞƌŝƐŐƌĞĂƚĞƌ ͘

3.1.2  Open Space
Intent
WƌŽǀŝĚĞǁĞůůͲĚĞƐŝŐŶĞĚŽƉĞŶƐƉĂĐĞƐƚŚĂƚŽīĞƌ
ŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƟĞƐƚŽƌĞůĂdž͕ƐŽĐŝĂůŝnjĞ͕ĂŶĚƉůĂLJ͘

3.1.2.1 Private Common Open Space -
Siting
KƉĞŶƐƉĂĐĞĂƌĞĂƐƐŚĂůůŶŽƚďĞůŽĐĂƚĞĚĚŝƌĞĐƚůLJŶĞdžƚƚŽ ĂƌƚĞƌŝĂůƐƚƌĞĞƚƐ͕ƐĞƌǀŝĐĞĂƌĞĂƐ͕ŽƌĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚĐŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂů ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƚŽĞŶƐƵƌĞƚŚĞLJĂƌĞƐŚĞůƚĞƌĞĚĨƌŽŵ
ƚŚĞŶŽŝƐĞĂŶĚƚƌĂĨĮĐŽĨĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚƐƚƌĞĞƚƐŽƌŽƚŚĞƌ
ŝŶĐŽŵƉĂƟďůĞƵƐĞƐ͘ůƚĞƌŶĂƟǀĞůLJ͕ĂŵŝŶŝŵƵŵŽĨϭϬĨĞĞƚ
ŽĨĚĞŶƐĞůĂŶĚƐĐĂƉŝŶŐƐŚĂůůďĞƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚĂƐƐĐƌĞĞŶŝŶŐ
ďĞƚǁĞĞŶƚŚĞŽƉĞŶƐƉĂĐĞĂƌĞĂĂŶĚĂƌƚĞƌŝĂůƐƚƌĞĞƚ͕
ƐĞƌǀŝĐĞĂƌĞĂ͕ŽƌĐŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂůĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͘

3.1.2.2 Private Common Open Space -
Usability
KƉĞŶƐƉĂĐĞƐƵƌĨĂĐĞƐƐŚĂůůŝŶĐůƵĚĞĂĐŽŵďŝŶĂƟŽŶŽĨ
ůĂǁŶ͕ŐĂƌĚĞŶ͕ŇĂŐƐƚŽŶĞ͕ŐƌĂǀĞů͕ǁŽŽĚĚĞĐŬŝŶŐ͕ƉůĂLJ
ƐƵƌĨĂĐĞƐ͕ĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞ͕ŽƌŽƚŚĞƌƐĞƌǀŝĐĞĂďůĞĂŶĚƵƐĂďůĞ
ƐƵƌĨĂĐĞŵĂƚĞƌŝĂů͘dŚĞƐůŽƉĞƐŚĂůůŶŽƚĞdžĐĞĞĚϭϬƉĞƌĐĞŶƚ͘

3.1.2.3 Minimum Dimensions
ŽŵŵŽŶƵƐĂďůĞŽƉĞŶƐƉĂĐĞŽŶƚŚĞŐƌŽƵŶĚůĞǀĞů
ƐŚĂůůŚĂǀĞŶŽŚŽƌŝnjŽŶƚĂůĚŝŵĞŶƐŝŽŶůĞƐƐƚŚĂŶϭϱ
ĨĞĞƚ͘ZŽŽĨĚĞĐŬŽƉĞŶƐƉĂĐĞƐƐŚĂůůŚĂǀĞŶŽŚŽƌŝnjŽŶƚĂů
ĚŝŵĞŶƐŝŽŶůĞƐƐƚŚĂŶϭϬĨĞĞƚ͘ZŽŽŌŽƉŽƉĞŶƐƉĂĐĞƐƐŚĂůů
ŝŶĐŽƌƉŽƌĂƚĞĂƐŽůŝĚŽƌŐůĂƐƐƐĐƌĞĞŶŽƌďĂƌƌŝĞƌŽƌďĞ
ĞŶƟƌĞůLJĞŶĐůŽƐĞĚƚŽůŝŵŝƚǁŝŶĚ͘

3.1.2.4 Visibility
ƚůĞĂƐƚŽŶĞƐŝĚĞŽĨŐƌŽƵŶĚͲůĞǀĞůĐŽŵŵŽŶŽƉĞŶƐƉĂĐĞƐ
ƐŚĂůůďŽƌĚĞƌƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂůďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐǁŝƚŚƚƌĂŶƐƉĂƌĞŶƚ
ǁŝŶĚŽǁƐĂŶĚͬŽƌĞŶƚƌLJǁĂLJƐ͕ƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞŶĂƚƵƌĂů
ƐƵƌǀĞŝůůĂŶĐĞŽĨƚŚĞƐƉĂĐĞ͘

24 SINGLE-FAMILY AND MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS City of Daly City 3. Objective Design Standards for Multi-Family Residential Developments WƌŝǀĂƚĞĐŽŵŵŽŶŽƉĞŶƐƉĂĐĞǁŝƚŚƌŽŽŌŽƉŐĂƌĚĞŶ͘

3.1.2.5 Standard Pedestrian Walkways
WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶǁĂůŬǁĂLJƐƐŚĂůůĐŽŶŶĞĐƚƚŚĞĐŽŵŵŽŶŽƉĞŶ
ƐƉĂĐĞĚŝƌĞĐƚůLJƚŽĂƉƵďůŝĐƌŝŐŚƚͲŽĨͲǁĂLJŽƌďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ
ĞŶƚƌĂŶĐĞ͘

3.1.2.6 Seating
ůůĐŽŵŵŽŶŽƉĞŶƐƉĂĐĞƐƐŚĂůůŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐĞĂƟŶŐ͘^ŝƚĞ
ĨƵƌŶŝƚƵƌĞƐŚĂůůƵƐĞŐƌĂĨĮƟͲƌĞƐŝƐƚĂŶƚŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůĂŶĚͬŽƌ
ĐŽĂƟŶŐĂŶĚƐŬĂƚĞďŽĂƌĚĚĞƚĞƌƌĞŶƚƐƚŽƌĞƚĂŝŶƚŚĞƐŝƚĞ
ĨƵƌŶŝƚƵƌĞ͛ƐĂƩƌĂĐƟǀĞŶĞƐƐ͘

3.1.2.7 Amenity Features
ƚůĞĂƐƚŽŶĞĂŵĞŶŝƚLJĨĞĂƚƵƌĞ͕ƐƵĐŚĂƐĂƉůĂLJƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ͕ ƉůĂnjĂ͕ƐŝƫŶŐĂƌĞĂ͕ǁĂƚĞƌĨĞĂƚƵƌĞ͕ĮƌĞĨĞĂƚƵƌĞ͕Žƌ
ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJŐĂƌĚĞŶƐŚĂůůďĞŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚŝŶĞĂĐŚŽƉĞŶ
space area.

3.1.2.8 Play Areas
ĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƐƚŚĂƚŝŶĐůƵĚĞϭϱŽƌŵŽƌĞƵŶŝƚƐŽĨƚǁŽ
ďĞĚƌŽŽŵƐŽƌŵŽƌĞƐŚĂůůŝŶĐůƵĚĞĐŚŝůĚƌĞŶ͛ƐƉůĂLJĂƌĞĂƐ
ĂŶĚƉůĂLJƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞƐŝŶĂƐŝnjĞĂŶĚĚĞƐŝŐŶĂĐĐĞƉƚĂďůĞƚŽ ƚŚĞWůĂŶŶŝŶŐŝǀŝƐŝŽŶ͘dŚŝƐƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚĚŽĞƐŶŽƚĂƉƉůLJ ƚŽƐĞŶŝŽƌŚŽƵƐŝŶŐĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƐ͘

3.1.2.9 Open-Air Structures
&ŽŽƚƉƌŝŶƚƐŽĨƚŚĞŽƉĞŶͲĂŝƌƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞƐ͕ƐƵĐŚĂƐƚƌĞůůŝƐ ƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞƐ͕ƉĞƌŐŽůĂƐ͕ĂŶĚĂƌďŽƌƐƵƉƚŽϭϮϬƐƋƵĂƌĞ
ĨĞĞƚƐŚĂůůďĞĐŽƵŶƚĞĚƚŽǁĂƌĚƚŚĞƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚŵŝŶŝŵƵŵ
landscaped area.

3.1.3  Multiple-Building
Development
Intent
tŚĞƌĞŵƵůƟĨĂŵŝůLJƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐŝŶĐůƵĚĞŵƵůƟƉůĞ
ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐ͕ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞǀŝƐƵĂůůLJŝŶƚĞƌĞƐƟŶŐƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂů
ƐƚƌĞĞƚƐĐĂƉĞƐŝŶĂĐŝƌĐƵůĂƟŽŶƉĂƩĞƌŶƚŚĂƚŚĂƐĂŶ
ŽƉĞŶ͕ƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĐŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌ ͘

3.1.3.1 Circulation
» EĞǁƉƌŝǀĂƚĞƐƚƌĞĞƚƐǁŝƚŚŝŶĂŵƵůƟƉůĞͲďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ
ƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐŚĂůůďĞĂůŝŐŶĞĚǁŝƚŚƐƵƌƌŽƵŶĚŝŶŐĞdžŝƐƟŶŐ
ĂŶĚƉůĂŶŶĞĚƐƚƌĞĞƚƐƚŽĐƌĞĂƚĞĂĐŽŶƟŶƵŽƵƐƐƚƌĞĞƚ
ƉĂƩĞƌŶ͘
» ůůĐŽŵŵŽŶŽƉĞŶƐƉĂĐĞƐƐŚĂůůďĞĚŝƌĞĐƚůLJĂĐĐĞƐƐŝďůĞ
ďLJĂƚůĞĂƐƚŽŶĞƐƚƌĞĞƚĂŶĚŽŶĞƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƉĂƚŚǁĂLJ͕
ďŝĐLJĐůĞĨĂĐŝůŝƚLJ͕ĂŶĚͬŽƌŵƵůƟŵŽĚĂůƉĂƚŚǁĂLJ͘
» dŚĞĞŶĚƐŽĨĂůůƉƌŝǀĂƚĞƐƚƌĞĞƚƐůŽŶŐĞƌƚŚĂŶϱϬϬĨĞĞƚ ƐŚĂůůŝŶĐůƵĚĞĂƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĐŽŶŶĞĐƟŽŶƚŽĂŶŽƚŚĞƌ
ƐƚƌĞĞƚ͕ŵƵůƟͲŵŽĚĂůƉĂƚŚǁĂLJ͕ŽƌĐŽŵŵŽŶŽƉĞŶ
space.

SINGLE-FAMILY AND MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS 25 City of Daly City 3. Objective Design Standards for Multi-Family Residential Developments

3.1.3.2 Street Entry Features
ƚůĞĂƐƚŽŶĞĞŶƚƌLJŝŶƚŽƚŚĞƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂůŵƵůƟƉůĞͲďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƐŚĂůůďĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞĚĂƐĂŶĞŶƚƌLJĚƌŝǀĞǁŝƚŚ
ƚŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐĨĞĂƚƵƌĞƐ͗
» ĮǀĞͲĨŽŽƚͲŵŝŶŝŵƵŵǁŝĚƚŚƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬƐŚĂůůďĞ
ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚŽŶĂƚůĞĂƐƚŽŶĞƐŝĚĞŽĨƚŚĞƐŚĂƌĞĚĞŶƚƌLJ
ĚƌŝǀĞĨƌŽŵƚŚĞƐƚƌĞĞƚƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬƚŽĂŵŝŶŝŵƵŵŽĨ
ϱϬĨĞĞƚŝŶƐŝĚĞƚŚĞƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJůŝŶĞ͕ŽƌƚŽƚŚĞĮƌƐƚ
ŝŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƟŽŶǁŝƚŚĂƉƌŝǀĂƚĞƐƚƌĞĞƚŽƌĂůůĞLJ͘
» tŚĞƌĞƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĨĂĐŝůŝƟĞƐĐƌŽƐƐƐŝƚĞĞŶƚƌŝĞƐ͕ƚŚĞ
ƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐƐŚĂůůďĞŚŝŐŚůŝŐŚƚĞĚƚŚƌŽƵŐŚƚŚĞ
ƵƐĞŽĨŚŝŐŚͲǀŝƐŝďŝůŝƚLJƐƚƌŝƉŝŶŐŽƌƐƉĞĐŝĂůƚĞdžƚƵƌĞĚĂŶĚͬ ŽƌĐŽůŽƌĞĚƉĂǀŝŶŐ͘
/ŶĂĚĚŝƟŽŶ͕ƚŚĞĞŶƚƌLJĚƌŝǀĞƐŚĂůůŚĂǀĞĂƚůĞĂƐƚŽŶĞŽĨ ƚŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐĨĞĂƚƵƌĞƐ͗
^ƉĞĐŝĂůůĂŶĚƐĐĂƉŝŶŐŽŶďŽƚŚƐŝĚĞƐŽĨƚŚĞĞŶƚƌLJĚƌŝǀĞ
ƚŚĂƚŵĂLJŝŶĐůƵĚĞďŽƚŚƐƉĞĐŝŵĞŶƚƌĞĞƐĂŶĚďĂĐŬŐƌŽƵŶĚ
ůĂŶĚƐĐĂƉŝŶŐ͘
» dĞdžƚƵƌĞĚ͕ĐŽůŽƌĞĚ͕ŽƌƐƚĂŵƉĞĚƌŽĂĚǁĂLJƉĂǀŝŶŐĨƌŽŵ
ƚŚĞŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJůŝŶĞƚŽƚŚĞĮƌƐƚŝŶƚĞƌŝŽƌ
ŝŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƟŽŶ͘
» ŵŝŶŝŵƵŵĨŽƵƌͲĨŽŽƚͲǁŝĚĞůĂŶĚƐĐĂƉĞĚŵĞĚŝĂŶǁŝƚŚ
ŝŶƚĞŐƌĂƚĞĚƐŝŐŶĂŐĞĨƌŽŵƚŚĞŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJ
ůŝŶĞƚŽƚŚĞĮƌƐƚŝŶƚĞƌŝŽƌŝŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƟŽŶ͘

3.1.4  Parking
Intent
DŝŶŝŵŝnjĞƚŚĞƉƵďůŝĐǀŝĞǁŽĨƉĂƌŬŝŶŐĂŶĚƉƌŽǀŝĚĞ
ĞĂƐLJĂĐĐĞƐƐƚŽƉĂƌŬŝŶŐĂŶĚƐĞƌǀŝĐĞĂƌĞĂƐ͘

3.1.4.1 Parking Areas Siting
» dŽůŝŵŝƚƚŚĞǀŝƐƵĂůŝŵƉĂĐƚŽĨƉĂƌŬŝŶŐĂůŽŶŐƐƚƌĞĞƚƐ͕ ƉĂƌŬŝŶŐƐŚĂůůďĞůŽĐĂƚĞĚƚŽƚŚĞƌĞĂƌ͕ƐŝĚĞ͕ŽƌƵŶĚĞƌ
ƚŚĞďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ͘
» ŽƌŶĞƌƉĂƌŬŝŶŐůŽƚƐĂƌĞƉƌŽŚŝďŝƚĞĚ͘

3.1.4.2 Parking Access
» >ŽĐĂƚĞƉĂƌŬŝŶŐĂĐĐĞƐƐŽŶƐŝĚĞĂŶĚͬŽƌƌĞĂƌƐƚƌĞĞƚƐ
ƵŶůĞƐƐƚŚĞƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJŚĂƐŶŽƌĞĂƌŽƌƐŝĚĞĨƌŽŶƚĂŐĞŽŶ
ĂƉƵďůŝĐƌŝŐŚƚͲŽĨͲǁĂLJŽƌŝĨĞdžŝƐƟŶŐŐƌĂĚŝŶŐĐŽŶĚŝƟŽŶƐ
ĚŽŶŽƚƉĞƌŵŝƚƐŝĚĞŽƌƌĞĂƌͲƐƚƌĞĞƚƉĂƌŬŝŶŐͬƐĞƌǀŝĐĞ
ĂĐĐĞƐƐ͘/ĨƚŚĞƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJŚĂƐŶŽƌĞĂƌŽƌƐŝĚĞĨƌŽŶƚĂŐĞ
ŽŶĂƉƵďůŝĐƌŝŐŚƚͲŽĨͲǁĂLJŽƌŝĨĞdžŝƐƟŶŐŐƌĂĚŝŶŐ
ĐŽŶĚŝƟŽŶƐĚŽŶŽƚƉĞƌŵŝƚƐŝĚĞŽƌƌĞĂƌƐƚƌĞĞƚƉĂƌŬŝŶŐͬ
ƐĞƌǀŝĐĞĂĐĐĞƐƐ͕ƉĂƌŬŝŶŐĂŶĚƐĞƌǀŝĐĞĂĐĐĞƐƐŵĂLJďĞ
ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚĨƌŽŵƚŚĞƐƚƌĞĞƚ͘
» tŚĞƌĞǀĞŚŝĐůĞĂĐĐĞƐƐůĞĂĚƐŝŶƚŽƉĂƌŬŝŶŐůŽƚƐĂƚƚŚĞ
ŝŶƚĞƌŝŽƌŽĨĂƐŝƚĞ͕ƚŚĞĮƌƐƚϱϬĨĞĞƚŽĨǀĞŚŝĐůĞĂĐĐĞƐƐ ůĂŶĞƐ;ƐƚĂƌƟŶŐĂƚƚŚĞƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJůŝŶĞͿƐŚĂůůŝŶĐůƵĚĞĂůů ŽĨƚŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐ͗
» ŵŝŶŝŵƵŵĮǀĞͲĨŽŽƚͲǁŝĚĞƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶǁĂůŬǁĂLJŽŶĂƚ
ůĞĂƐƚŽŶĞƐŝĚĞ͘
» ŵŝŶŝŵƵŵƚŚƌĞĞͲĨŽŽƚͲǁŝĚĞůĂŶĚƐĐĂƉĞĚĂƌĞĂŽŶ
ďŽƚŚƐŝĚĞƐ͘
» WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶͲƐĐĂůĞĚůŝŐŚƟŶŐŝŶƚŚĞĨŽƌŵŽĨůŝŐŚƚƉŽůĞƐ ŶŽŐƌĞĂƚĞƌƚŚĂŶĞŝŐŚƚĨĞĞƚƚĂůůŽƌďŽůůĂƌĚůŝŐŚƟŶŐ
ĂůŽŶŐƚŚĞƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶǁĂůŬǁĂLJĂƚĂŵŝŶŝŵƵŵĂǀĞƌĂŐĞ
ŽĨŽŶĞĨŽŽƚͲĐĂŶĚůĞ͘

3.1.4.3 Curb Cuts
DŝŶŝŵŝnjĞƚŚĞŶƵŵďĞƌŽĨĐƵƌďĐƵƚƐĨŽƌĚƌŝǀĞǁĂLJƐ͘&Žƌ
ƉĂƌĐĞůƐƚƌĞĞƚĨƌŽŶƚĂŐĞƐůĞƐƐƚŚĂŶϯϬϬĨĞĞƚ͕ŶŽŵŽƌĞƚŚĂŶ ŽŶĞĐƵƌďĐƵƚĂƚϮϱĨĞĞƚǁŝĚƚŚŵĂdžŝŵƵŵŝƐĂůůŽǁĞĚ͘&Žƌ
ƉĂƌĐĞůƐƚƌĞĞƚĨƌŽŶƚĂŐĞƐϯϬϬĨĞĞƚŽƌŵŽƌĞ͕ŶŽŵŽƌĞƚŚĂŶ ƚǁŽĐƵƌďĐƵƚƐĂƚϮϱĨĞĞƚǁŝĚƚŚŵĂdžŝŵƵŵĂƌĞĂůůŽǁĞĚ͘
tŚĞƌĞƉĂƌŬŝŶŐŝŶŐƌĞƐƐĂŶĚĞŐƌĞƐƐĂƌĞƐĞƉĂƌĂƚĞĚ͕ĞĂĐŚ
ĚƌŝǀĞǁĂLJƐŚĂůůďĞŶŽƚŵŽƌĞƚŚĂŶϭϮĨĞĞƚǁŝĚĞ͘tŚĞƌĞ
ĂďƵŝůĚŝŶŐŝƐƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚŽŶĂĐŽƌŶĞƌƉĂƌĐĞůƚŚĂƚŽŶůLJŚĂƐ ŽŶĞĂĐĐĞƐƐƉŽŝŶƚ͕ƚŚĞĂĐĐĞƐƐƐŚĂůůďĞƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚŽŶŵŽƌĞ ŵŝŶŽƌ;ůĞƐƐƚƌĂĸĐŬĞĚͿƐƚƌĞĞƚƐ͕ƵŶůĞƐƐŽƚŚĞƌǁŝƐĞĂůůŽǁĞĚ ďLJƚŚĞWůĂŶŶŝŶŐŝǀŝƐŝŽŶ͘

26 SINGLE-FAMILY AND MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS City of Daly City 3. Objective Design Standards for Multi-Family Residential Developments » >ĂŶĚƐĐĂƉŝŶŐƵƐĞĚĨŽƌƐĐƌĞĞŶŝŶŐƉƵƌƉŽƐĞƐƐŚĂůůďĞ
ĂƚůĞĂƐƚĨŽƵƌĨĞĞƚƚĂůůĂŶĚƐŚĂůůďĞƉƌŽĨĞƐƐŝŽŶĂůůLJ
ŵĂŝŶƚĂŝŶĞĚ͘
» tŚĞƌĞƉĂƌŬŝŶŐůŽƚƐĨŽƌŵƵůƟĨĂŵŝůLJƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂů
ƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐĂƌĞĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚƚŽƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂůůŽƚƐ͕ĂůĂŶĚƐĐĂƉĞĚ ďƵīĞƌƐŚĂůůďĞĞŵƉůŽLJĞĚĂůŽŶŐƌĞĂƌĂŶĚƐŝĚĞ
ƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJůŝŶĞƐƚŽƐĐƌĞĞŶƉĂƌŬŝŶŐůŽƚƐĨƌŽŵǀŝĞǁƐĨƌŽŵ
ƚŚĞĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂůůŽƚƐ͘>ĂŶĚƐĐĂƉĞďƵīĞƌƐĨŽƌ
ƉĂƌŬŝŶŐůŽƚƐƐŚĂůůĐŽŵƉůLJǁŝƚŚďŽƚŚŽĨƚŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐ͗
» dŚĞůĂŶĚƐĐĂƉĞĚďƵīĞƌƐŚĂůůŚĂǀĞĂŵŝŶŝŵƵŵǁŝĚƚŚ
ŽĨϭϬĨĞĞƚ͘
» ƉůĂŶƚĞĚƐĐƌĞĞŶŽĨĂƉƉƌŽǀĞĚƚƌĞĞƐĂŶĚƐŚƌƵďƐ
ŽƌŶŽŶͲĐŚĂŝŶͲůŝŶŬĨĞŶĐŝŶŐĂƚůĞĂƐƚƐŝdžĨĞĞƚƚĂůůƐŚĂůů ĞdžƚĞŶĚĂůŽŶŐƚŚĞůĞŶŐƚŚŽĨƚŚĞďƵīĞƌ ͘

3.1.4.6 Structured Parking Design
» >ĂŶĚƐĐĂƉĞďƵīĞƌƐǁŝƚŚĂŵŝŶŝŵƵŵǁŝĚƚŚŽĨϭϬĨĞĞƚ
ƐŚĂůůďĞƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚŽŶĂůůƐŝĚĞƐŽĨĂŶLJĞŶĐůŽƐĞĚƉĂƌŬŝŶŐ ƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ͕ĞdžĐĞƉƚǁŚĞƌĞĞŶƚƌŝĞƐƚŽƚŚĞƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĂƌĞ
ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚĂƚƚŚĞŐƌŽƵŶĚůĞǀĞů͘/ŶĂĚĚŝƟŽŶ͕ƚŚĞŐƌŽƵŶĚ
ŇŽŽƌƐŚĂůůďĞĚĞƐŝŐŶĞĚƚŽƐŚŝĞůĚĚŝƌĞĐƚǀŝĞǁƐŽĨ
ƉĂƌŬĞĚĐĂƌƐƚŚƌŽƵŐŚƚŚĞƵƐĞŽĨƐŽůŝĚǁĂůůƐĂƚůĞĂƐƚϰϮ ŝŶĐŚĞƐŚŝŐŚ͕ĞdžĐĞƉƚǁŝƚŚŝŶĂǀŝƐŝŽŶƚƌŝĂŶŐůĞ͘

3.1.4.4 Vehicular Access to Structured
Parking
ƚůĞĂƐƚŽŶĞŽĨƚŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐƐŚĂůůďĞƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚĨŽƌĂůů ǀĞŚŝĐůĞĂĐĐĞƐƐƌŽƵƚĞƐƚŽƉĂƌŬŝŶŐĂƌĞĂƐŝŶƐŝĚĞďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐ͗ » tŚĞƌĞǀĞŚŝĐůĞĂĐĐĞƐƐůĞĂĚƐĚŝƌĞĐƚůLJŝŶƚŽĂƉĂƌŬŝŶŐ
ƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ͕ĂǁĞůĐŽŵŝŶŐĞŶƚƌLJƉŽŝŶƚŽƌĚƌŽƉͲŽīĂƌĞĂ
ƐŚĂůůďĞƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚ͘
» dŚĞĞŶƚƌLJƉŽŝŶƚŝŶƚŽƚŚĞƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ;Ğ͘Ő͕͘ĂŶLJŐĂƚĞ
ŽƌŐĂƌĂŐĞĚŽŽƌͿƐŚĂůůďĞƌĞĐĞƐƐĞĚĂŵŝŶŝŵƵŵŽĨϭϲ
ĨĞĞƚĨƌŽŵƚŚĞĞĚŐĞŽĨƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬƚŽĂůůŽǁĂĐĂƌƚŽƉƵůů
ĨŽƌǁĂƌĚĂŶĚŶŽƚŽďƐƚƌƵĐƚƚŚĞƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬ͘
» dŚĞĞŶƚƌLJĚƌŝǀĞƚŽĂƉĂƌŬŝŶŐƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞƐŚĂůůŚĂǀĞĂ
ŵŝŶŝŵƵŵĨŽƵƌͲĨŽŽƚͲǁŝĚĞƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶǁĂůŬǁĂLJŽŶĂƚ
ůĞĂƐƚŽŶĞƐŝĚĞ͘

3.1.4.5 Parking Lot Screening
» WĂƌŬŝŶŐůŽƚƐĨŽƌŵƵůƟĨĂŵŝůLJĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƐĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚ
ƚŽƉƵďůŝĐƐƚƌĞĞƚƐƐŚĂůůďĞƐĐƌĞĞŶĞĚĨƌŽŵƉƵďůŝĐǀŝĞǁ͕
ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚƉĂƌĐĞůƐ͕ǁŝƚŚůĂŶĚƐĐĂƉŝŶŐ͕ĨĞŶĐŝŶŐ͕ ŽƌĂĐŽŵďŝŶĂƟŽŶŽĨďŽƚŚ͘
» tŚĞƌĞƉĂƌŬŝŶŐůŽƚƐĨŽƌŵƵůƟĨĂŵŝůLJƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐĂƌĞ
ĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚƚŽƉƵďůŝĐƐƚƌĞĞƚƐ͕ĂŵŝŶŝŵƵŵϭϬͲĨŽŽƚͲǁŝĚĞ
ůĂŶĚƐĐĂƉĞĚĨƌŽŶƚĂŐĞƐƚƌŝƉďĞƚǁĞĞŶƚŚĞƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬĂŶĚ
ƉĂƌŬŝŶŐĂƌĞĂŝƐƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚ͘dŚĞĨƌŽŶƚĂŐĞƐƚƌŝƉŵĂLJďĞ
ĐƌŽƐƐĞĚďLJǁĂůŬǁĂLJƐĂŶĚĂĐĐĞƐƐĚƌŝǀĞƐĂŶĚŵĂLJďĞ
ƉůĂĐĞĚƉĂƌƟĂůůLJŝŶƚŚĞƉƵďůŝĐƌŝŐŚƚͲŽĨͲǁĂLJ͘
^ƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĚWĂƌŬŝŶŐĐĐĞƐƐ
>ĂŶĚƐĐĂƉĞĚďƵīĞƌƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚďĞƚǁĞĞŶƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬĂŶĚ
ƉĂƌŬŝŶŐůŽƚ͘

SINGLE-FAMILY AND MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS 27 City of Daly City 3. Objective Design Standards for Multi-Family Residential Developments » ƚůĞĂƐƚϮϱƉĞƌĐĞŶƚŽĨĂŶLJĞdžƚĞƌŝŽƌĞůĞǀĂƟŽŶŽĨĂŶLJ
ƉĂƌŬŝŶŐƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞǀŝƐŝďůĞĂďŽǀĞŐƌĂĚĞƐŚĂůůďĞƚƌĞĂƚĞĚ ǁŝƚŚĂƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂůůLJĚĞƐŝŐŶĞĚƐĐƌĞĞŶŝŶŐŽƌĨĞĂƚƵƌĞƐ͕
ĂƌƚǁŽƌŬ͕ůĂŶĚƐĐĂƉĞĚƐĐƌĞĞŶŝŶŐ͕ŽƌůŝǀŝŶŐǁĂůůƐ͘
» tŚĞƌĞĂƉĂƌŬŝŶŐƉŽĚŝƵŵĨŽƌŵƐƚŚĞŐƌŽƵŶĚŇŽŽƌ
ŽƌŇŽŽƌƐŽĨĂďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ͕ƚŚĞǀŝƐŝďůĞƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞƐŚĂůů
ďĞĚĞƐŝŐŶĞĚĂƐƚŚĞĞůĞǀĂƟŽŶ͛ƐďĂƐĞŽƌƉĂƌƚŽĨ
ƚŚĞĞůĞǀĂƟŽŶ͛ƐďĂƐĞĂůŽŶŐƚŚĞƐƚƌĞĞƚĨƌŽŶƚĂŐĞ͘
WĂƌŬŝŶŐƉŽĚŝƵŵŵĂƐƐŝŶŐ͕ĚŝŵĞŶƐŝŽŶĂůŵŽĚƵůĞƐ͕
ǁĂůůƚĞdžƚƵƌĞƐ͕ĂŶĚĐŽůŽƌƐƐŚĂůůďĞĂƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂůůLJ
ĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚǁŝƚŚƚŚĞĞůĞǀĂƟŽŶƐŽĨƚŚĞďƵŝůĚŝŶŐĂďŽǀĞ͘
» WĂƌŬŝŶŐƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞŇŽŽƌƐƉĂƌƟĂůůLJďĞůŽǁŐƌĂĚĞƐŚĂůů
ďĞůŝŵŝƚĞĚƚŽĂŵĂdžŝŵƵŵŚĞŝŐŚƚŽĨĮǀĞĨĞĞƚĂďŽǀĞ
ŐƌĂĚĞ͘

3.1.4.7 Services-Restricted Parking
Space Minimum
&ŽƌƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐǁŝƚŚĂŵŝŶŝŵƵŵŽĨϮϬƉĂƌŬŝŶŐƐƉĂĐĞƐ͕Ăƚ
ůĞĂƐƚŽŶĞƉĂƌŬŝŶŐƐƉĂĐĞĚĞĚŝĐĂƚĞĚƚŽůŽĂĚŝŶŐͬƵŶůŽĂĚŝŶŐ ŽƌƉŝĐŬͲƵƉͬĚƌŽƉͲŽīĂĐƟǀŝƟĞƐ;ŝ͘Ğ͕͘ƐĞƌǀŝĐĞ͕ƐŚƵƩůĞ͕
ƚĂdžŝ͕ƌŝĚĞƐŚĂƌĞƐĞƌǀŝĐĞͿƐŚĂůůďĞƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚƉĞƌďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ ĂŶĚƐŚĂůůďĞĚŝƌĞĐƚůLJĂĐĐĞƐƐŝďůĞĨƌŽŵƚŚĞďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ͘dŚĞ ĚĞĚŝĐĂƚĞĚƉĂƌŬŝŶŐƐƉĂĐĞŵĂLJďĞŝŶĂƐƵƌĨĂĐĞƉĂƌŬŝŶŐůŽƚ ĂƌĞĂŽƌŝŶƐŝĚĞĂƉĂƌŬŝŶŐƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ͘

3.1.4.8 Bicycle Parking
ůůĐŽŵŵŽŶŽƉĞŶƐƉĂĐĞƐƐŚĂůůƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƉĂƌŬŝŶŐƌĂĐŬƐ
ĨŽƌĂƚůĞĂƐƚĨŽƵƌďŝĐLJĐůĞƐĂƚĞĂĐŚƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĞŶƚƌLJƚŽ ƚŚĞŽƉĞŶƐƉĂĐĞ͕ƵŶůĞƐƐŵŽƌĞƉĂƌŬŝŶŐŝƐƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚďLJƚŚĞ ŝƚLJ͛ƐďƵŝůĚŝŶŐĐŽĚĞ͘

3.1.5  Trash and Recycling Areas
Intent
WƌŽǀŝĚĞƚƌĂƐŚĞŶĐůŽƐƵƌĞƐƚŚĂƚĂƌĞĞĂƐŝůLJĂĐĐĞƐƐŝďůĞ͕
ĚƵƌĂďůĞ͕ĂŶĚƐĐƌĞĞŶĞĚĨƌŽŵƉƵďůŝĐǀŝĞǁ͘

3.1.5.1 Trash Storage Siting
» >ŽĐĂƚĞƌĞĐLJĐůŝŶŐĂŶĚƚƌĂƐŚĞŶĐůŽƐƵƌĞƐĂǁĂLJĨƌŽŵ
ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐĨƌŽŶƚƐĂŶĚŵĂũŽƌĞŶƚƌŝĞƐ͕ĂŶĚͬŽƌƐĐƌĞĞŶƐƵĐŚ
ƌĞĐĞƉƚĂĐůĞƐĨƌŽŵǀŝĞǁŝŶĮdžĞĚĞŶĐůŽƐƵƌĞƐ͘
» dƌĂƐŚƌĞĐĞƉƚĂĐůĞƐƐŚĂůůďĞĂĐĐĞƐƐŝďůĞĨŽƌƚƌĂƐŚ
ĐŽůůĞĐƟŽŶďƵƚƐŚĂůůŶŽƚďůŽĐŬĐŝƌĐƵůĂƟŽŶĚƌŝǀĞƐŶĞĂƌ
ůŽĂĚŝŶŐĂƌĞĂƐŽƌĐŽŶŇŝĐƚǁŝƚŚƉĂƌŬŝŶŐ͘
» dƌĂƐŚĞŶĐůŽƐƵƌĞƐƉůĂĐĞĚŶĞdžƚƚŽƉĂƌŬŝŶŐƐŚĂůůďĞ
ƐĞƉĂƌĂƚĞĚĨƌŽŵĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚƉĂƌŬŝŶŐƐƚĂůůƐǁŝƚŚĂ
ŵŝŶŝŵƵŵĮǀĞͲĨŽŽƚͲǁŝĚĞƉůĂŶƚĞƌĂƌĞĂ͘

3.1.5.2 Access to Trash Collection
Facilities
dŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐƐŚĂůůďĞƚƌƵĞŽĨĂůůƚƌĂƐŚĐŽůůĞĐƟŽŶ
ĨĂĐŝůŝƟĞƐŝŶŚŽƵƐŝŶŐĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐ͗
» dŚĞƐůŽƉĞŽĨƚŚĞƚƌƵĐŬĂĐĐĞƐƐƉĂƚŚůĞĂĚŝŶŐƚŽƚŚĞ
ĨĂĐŝůŝƚLJƐŚĂůůďĞŶŽŐƌĞĂƚĞƌƚŚĂŶĮǀĞƉĞƌĐĞŶƚŝŶƚŚĞ
ĚŝƌĞĐƟŽŶŽĨƚƌĂǀĞůĂŶĚƚǁŽƉĞƌĐĞŶƚŝŶƚŚĞĐƌŽƐƐ
slope.
» dŚĞĨĂĐŝůŝƚLJƐŚĂůůďĞůŽĐĂƚĞĚŶŽŵŽƌĞƚŚĂŶϯϱĨĞĞƚ
ĨƌŽŵƚŚĞƚƌƵĐŬĂĐĐĞƐƐƉŽŝŶƚ͘
» dŚĞĂƉƉůŝĐĂŶƚƐŚĂůůƐƵƉƉůLJĂůĞƩĞƌĨƌŽŵƚŚĞŝƚLJ͛Ɛ
ǁĂƐƚĞƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƌƚŚĂƚŝŶĚŝĐĂƚĞƐƚŚĞƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƌĂŐƌĞĞƐ
ǁŝƚŚƚŚĞůŽĐĂƟŽŶ͕ƐŝnjĞ͕ĂŶĚĂĐĐĞƐƐŝďŝůŝƚLJŽĨƚŚĞƚƌĂƐŚ ĐŽůůĞĐƟŽŶͬƐƚŽƌĂŐĞĨĂĐŝůŝƚLJ͘

3.1.5.3 Review by Trash/Recycling
Service Provider
» ŶLJĂƉƉůŝĐĂƟŽŶĨŽƌĂŶĞǁďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐŚĂůůŚĂǀĞĂůů
ƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚƚƌĂƐŚͬƌĞĐLJĐůŝŶŐƐƚŽƌĂŐĞĐĂƉĂĐŝƚLJĂŶĚ
ƉŝĐŬͲƵƉůŽĐĂƟŽŶƐƌĞǀŝĞǁĞĚĂŶĚĂƉƉƌŽǀĞĚďLJƚŚĞ
ŝƚLJ͛ƐƚƌĂƐŚͬƌĞĐLJĐůŝŶŐƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƌ ͘

3.1.6  Cluster Mailbox Design
Intent
WƌŽǀŝĚĞĞĂƐŝůLJĂĐĐĞƐƐŝďůĞĂŶĚƐŚĞůƚĞƌĞĚĂƌĞĂƐĨŽƌ
ƐƚŽƌŝŶŐĂŶĚĐŽůůĞĐƟŶŐŵĂŝů͘
DĂŝůďŽdžĐůƵƐƚĞƌƐƐĞƌǀŝŶŐŐƌŽƵƉƐŽĨůŽƚƐŽƌĐůƵƐƚĞƌƐŽĨ ƵŶŝƚƐƐŚĂůůŵĞĞƚƚŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ͗
» ůƵƐƚĞƌƐĂŶĚĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞƐƐŚĂůůďĞĚĞƐŝŐŶĞĚ ƵƐŝŶŐŽŶĞŵŽƌĞĞdžƚĞƌŝŽƌĮŶŝƐŚŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐŽƌĐŽůŽƌƐ
ƵƐĞĚŽŶƚŚĞƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂůƵŶŝƚƐǁŝƚŚǁŚŝĐŚƚŚĞ
ŵĂŝůďŽdžĞƐĂƌĞĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚ͘

28 SINGLE-FAMILY AND MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS City of Daly City 3. Objective Design Standards for Multi-Family Residential Developments » ůƵƐƚĞƌĚĞƐŝŐŶĂŶĚůŽĐĂƟŽŶƐŚĂůůĐŽŶĨŽƌŵƚŽĂůůh͘^͘ WŽƐƚKĸĐĞƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ͘
» KŶůLJĐŽǀĞƌĞĚŵĂŝůďŽdžĂƌĞĂƐƐŚĂůůďĞĂůůŽǁĞĚ͕ĂŶĚ
ƐƵĐŚĐŽǀĞƌƐŚĂůůƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚŽǁŶǁĂƌĚŝůůƵŵŝŶĂƟŽŶ
ĚƵƌŝŶŐĞǀĞŶŝŶŐŚŽƵƌƐ͘

3.1.7  Services and Utilities
Intent
WƌŽǀŝĚĞƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐĂŶĚƵƟůŝƟĞƐƚŚĂƚĂƌĞĂĚĞƋƵĂƚĞůLJ
ƐĐƌĞĞŶĞĚĨƌŽŵƉƵďůŝĐǀŝĞǁĂŶĚĂƌĞǀŝƐƵĂůůLJ
ĐŽŵƉĂƟďůĞǁŝƚŚƚŚĞƐƵƌƌŽƵŶĚŝŶŐĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͘
ǀŽŝĚƉůĂĐŝŶŐƵƟůŝƟĞƐĂŶĚƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐĂůŽŶŐĂĐƟǀĞ
ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐĨƌŽŶƚĂŐĞƐĂŶĚŝŶĨƌŽŶƚLJĂƌĚŽĨƉƌŽƉĞƌƟĞƐ͕
ƵŶůĞƐƐƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚďLJƌĞŐƵůĂƟŽŶ͘

3.1.7.1 Location Restrictions
» 'ƌŽƵŶĚͲŵŽƵŶƚĞĚƵƟůŝƟĞƐĂŶĚŵĞĐŚĂŶŝĐĂůĞƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚ
ƐŚĂůůŶŽƚďĞůŽĐĂƚĞĚŝŶĂƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚĨƌŽŶƚƐĞƚďĂĐŬĂƌĞĂ
ŽƌďĞƚǁĞĞŶĂŶLJƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĂŶĚĂĨƌŽŶƚƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJůŝŶĞ͕
ƵŶůĞƐƐƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚďLJƌĞŐƵůĂƟŽŶ͘
» tŚĞƌĞŐƌŽƵŶĚͲůĞǀĞůƵƟůŝƟĞƐĂŶĚŵĞĐŚĂŶŝĐĂů
ĞƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚŝƐƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚƚŽďĞŝŶƚŚĞĨƌŽŶƚLJĂƌĚŽƌ
ďĞƚǁĞĞŶĂďƵŝůĚŝŶŐĂŶĚƚŚĞƉƵďůŝĐƌŝŐŚƚͲŽĨͲǁĂLJ͕
ĂƚůĞĂƐƚƚŚƌĞĞŽĨƚŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐŵĞĂƐƵƌĞƐƐŚĂůůďĞ
ĂĚŚĞƌĞĚƚŽ͗
» 'ƌŽƵƉĂďŽǀĞͲŐƌŽƵŶĚƵƟůŝƟĞƐĂŶĚŵĞĐŚĂŶŝĐĂů
ĞƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚƚŽƚŚĞŚŝŐŚĞƐƚĚĞŐƌĞĞƉŽƐƐŝďůĞ͘
» KƌŝĞŶƚĞƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚƚŽďĞƉĞƌƉĞŶĚŝĐƵůĂƌƚŽƚŚĞ
ƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬĂŶĚŶŽƚƉĂƌĂůůĞů͕ĂƐƚŽƌĞƐƵůƚŝŶĂƐůŝŵŵĞƌ
ƉƌŽĮůĞĨƌŽŵƐƚƌĞĞƚǀŝĞǁ͘
» ^ĞƚĞƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚďĞůŽǁŐƌĂĚĞǁŝƚŚƐŽůŝĚŽƌŐƌĂƚĞĚ
ĐŽǀĞƌŝŶŐƐ͘
» /ŶƐƚĂůůǁĂůůƐ͕ĨĞŶĐĞƐ͕ŽƌƐĐƌĞĞŶƐƵƐŝŶŐĚĞƐŝŐŶĨĞĂƚƵƌĞƐ͕ ŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐ͕ĂŶĚĐŽůŽƌƐƵƐĞĚŝŶƚŚĞŵĂŝŶƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ͘dŚĞ
ƐĐƌĞĞŶŝŶŐƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞƐƐŚĂůůďĞĂƚůĞĂƐƚĂƐŚŝŐŚĂƐƚŚĞ
ĞƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚǁŝƚŚŽƵƚƉƌĞǀĞŶƟŶŐŵĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞĂĐĐĞƐƐ͘
» tŚĞƌĞƚŚĞƌĞŝƐĞŶŽƵŐŚƐƉĂĐĞ͕ƌĂŝƐĞƚŚĞĞdžŝƐƟŶŐ
ŐƌĂĚĞĂƌŽƵŶĚƚŚĞĞƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚǁŝƚŚĂďĞƌŵŽƌ
ĞĂƌƚŚǁŽƌŬ͘
» WƌŽǀŝĚĞhͲƐŚĂƉĞĚƉůĂŶƟŶŐƐŽĨƐŚƌƵďƐƚŚĂƚŐƌŽǁĂƚ
ůĞĂƐƚĂƐŚŝŐŚĂƐƚŚĞĞƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚǁŝƚŚŽƵƚƉƌĞǀĞŶƟŶŐ
ŵĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞĂĐĐĞƐƐ͘
» ĞƐŝŐŶƌĞĐĞƐƐĞƐŝŶƚŚĞďƵŝůĚŝŶŐǁĂůůƚŚĂƚƉƌŽǀŝĚĞ
ƐƉĂĐĞĨŽƌĞƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚƐĞƚďĂĐŬĨƌŽŵƚŚĞƉƵďůŝĐƌŝŐŚƚͲ
ŽĨͲǁĂLJ͘
» WĂŝŶƚĞƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚďůĂĐŬŽƌĚĂƌŬŐƌĞĞŶƚŽƌĞĚƵĐĞ
ƚŚĞŝƌǀŝƐŝďŝůŝƚLJ͕ƐƵďũĞĐƚƚŽŝŶĚŝǀŝĚƵĂůĞƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚ
ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ͘

3.1.7.2 Utility Meters
>ŽĐĂƚĞƵƟůŝƚLJŵĞƚĞƌƐŝŶƐĞƌǀŝĐĞ͕ůŽĂĚŝŶŐ͕ŽƌƐĐƌĞĞŶĞĚ
ĂƌĞĂƐ͘
džƚĞƌŝŽƌƐƵƌĨĂĐĞͲŵŽƵŶƚĞĚƵƟůŝƚLJďŽdžĞƐǀŝƐŝďůĞ
ĨƌŽŵƚŚĞƉƵďůŝĐƌŝŐŚƚͲŽĨͲǁĂLJĂƌĞƉƌŽŚŝďŝƚĞĚ͘hƟůŝƚLJ
ŵĞƚĞƌƐƐŚĂůůďĞƉĂŝŶƚĞĚƚŽŵĂƚĐŚƚŚĞĐŽůŽƌŽĨƚŚĞ
ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐĨĂĐĞƚŽǁŚŝĐŚƚŚĞLJĂƌĞĂƩĂĐŚĞĚ͘

3.1.7.3 Location of Transformers and
Generators

ůĞĐƚƌŝĐĂůƚƌĂŶƐĨŽƌŵĞƌƐĂŶĚŐĞŶĞƌĂƚŽƌƐƐŚĂůůďĞůŽĐĂƚĞĚ ƵŶĚĞƌŐƌŽƵŶĚǁŚĞƌĞǀĞƌƉŽƐƐŝďůĞ͘/ĨƵŶĚĞƌŐƌŽƵŶĚŝŶŐ
ŝƐŶŽƚĨĞĂƐŝďůĞ͕ĂƚůĞĂƐƚŽŶĞŽĨƚŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐŵĞĂƐƵƌĞƐ ƐŚĂůůďĞĞŵƉůŽLJĞĚ͗
»
ŶĐůŽƐŝŶŐĞƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ͘
» WůĂĐŝŶŐĞƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚƚŽƚŚĞƐŝĚĞŽƌďĞŚŝŶĚƚŚĞ
ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐĂŶĚƐĐƌĞĞŶŝŶŐǁŝƚŚǁĂůůƐ͕ĨĞŶĐĞƐ͕ŽƌŽƚŚĞƌ
ƐĐƌĞĞŶƐƚŚĂƚĐŽŶƚĂŝŶĚĞƐŝŐŶĨĞĂƚƵƌĞƐ͕ŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐ͕ĂŶĚ
ĐŽůŽƌƐƌĞůĂƚĞĚƚŽƚŚĞŵĂŝŶƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ͘dŚĞŚĞŝŐŚƚŽĨ
ƚŚĞƐĐƌĞĞŶŝŶŐǁĂůůƐƐŚĂůůĂƚůĞĂƐƚďĞĂƐƚĂůůĂƐƚŚĞ
ŵŽƵŶƚĞĚŚĞŝŐŚƚŽĨƚŚĞƚƌĂŶƐĨŽƌŵĞƌͬŐĞŶĞƌĂƚŽƌ ͘
» /ĨƚŚĞƵƟůŝƚLJĐŽŵƉĂŶLJĚĞƚĞƌŵŝŶĞƐƉůĂĐĞŵĞŶƚƚŽƚŚĞ
ƐŝĚĞŽƌďĞŚŝŶĚƚŚĞďƵŝůĚŝŶŐŝƐŶŽƚĨĞĂƐŝďůĞ͕ĂƐŽůŝĚ
ĞŶĐůŽƐƵƌĞǁŝƚŚƐĐƌĞĞŶŝŶŐǁĂůůƐĂƚůĞĂƐƚĂƐƚĂůůĂƐ
ƚŚĞŵŽƵŶƚĞĚŚĞŝŐŚƚŽĨƚŚĞƚƌĂŶƐĨŽƌŵĞƌͬŐĞŶĞƌĂƚŽƌ
ĂŶĚĂŶLJĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚǀĞŶƟůĂƟŽŶĞƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚƐŚĂůůďĞ
ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚ͘dŚĞƐĐƌĞĞŶŝŶŐĞŶĐůŽƐƵƌĞƐŚĂůůďĞůŽĐĂƚĞĚ
ĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚƚŽƚŚĞďƵŝůĚŝŶŐǁĂůůĂŶĚƵƐĞƐŝŵŝůĂƌĐŽůŽƌƐ
ĂŶĚŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐĂƐƚŚĞĂĚũŽŝŶŝŶŐďƵŝůĚŝŶŐǁĂůů͘

SINGLE-FAMILY AND MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS 29 City of Daly City 3. Objective Design Standards for Multi-Family Residential Developments

3.1.7.4 Screening of Backflow Preventers
ĂĐŬŇŽǁƉƌĞǀĞŶƚĞƌƐ;&WƐͿƐŚĂůůďĞƐĐƌĞĞŶĞĚĨƌŽŵǀŝĞǁ
ƵƐŝŶŐŽŶĞŽƌŵŽƌĞŽĨƚŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐĚĞƐŝŐŶĂƉƉƌŽĂĐŚĞƐ͗
» ŽŶƐŽůŝĚĂƚĞĂůů&WĐŽŵƉŽŶĞŶƚƐŝŶĂƐŝŶŐůĞůŽĐĂƟŽŶ
ǁŝƚŚŝŶϭϬĨĞĞƚŽĨƚŚĞƐŝĚĞƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJůŝŶĞ͘
» ŽŶƐŽůŝĚĂƚĞĂůů&WĐŽŵƉŽŶĞŶƚƐŝŶĂƐŝŶŐůĞůŽĐĂƟŽŶ͘
» ^ĐƌĞĞŶ&WƐǁŝƚŚĂŚĞĚŐĞŽĨǀŝƐƵĂůůLJĚĞŶƐĞĂŶĚ
ǁĂƚĞƌͲĐŽŶƐĞƌǀŝŶŐƐƉĞĐŝĞƐĂƚůĞĂƐƚĨŽƵƌĨĞĞƚƚĂůůĂŶĚ
ƐƵƌƌŽƵŶĚŝŶŐ&WƐŽŶƐƚƌĞĞƚͲĨĂĐŝŶŐĨƌŽŶƚĂŐĞĂŶĚƚǁŽ
ŽƚŚĞƌƐŝĚĞƐ͕ǁŚŝůĞŵĂŝŶƚĂŝŶŝŶŐƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚĂĐĐĞƐƐĨŽƌ
ŵĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞ͘
» /ŶƐƚĂůůĂǁĂůů͕ĨĞŶĐĞ͕ŽƌƐĐƌĞĞŶĂƌŽƵŶĚƚŚƌĞĞƐŝĚĞƐŽĨ &WĚŝƐƉůĂLJŝŶŐŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐ͕ĐŽůŽƌƐ͕ŽƌĚĞƐŝŐŶĨĞĂƚƵƌĞƐ
ƵƐĞĚŝŶƚŚĞƉƌŝŶĐŝƉĂůďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ͘
» dŚĞĂƉƉůŝĐĂŶƚƐŚĂůůƉĂŝŶƚĂůů&WƐĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌĚĞǀŝĐĞƐ ĂĐĐŽƌĚŝŶŐƚŽƚŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐƐĐŚĞĚƵůĞ͗
» ŽŵĞƐƟĐǁĂƚĞƌĂďŽǀĞŐƌŽƵŶĚƉŝƉŝŶŐĂŶĚĚĞǀŝĐĞƐĂƌĞ
WƌĞĐĂƵƟŽŶůƵĞηϮϮ͘
» /ƌƌŝŐĂƟŽŶǁĂƚĞƌĂďŽǀĞŐƌŽƵŶĚƉŝƉŝŶŐĂŶĚĚĞǀŝĐĞƐĂƌĞ
ŝůůŝĂƌĚdĂďůĞ'ƌĞĞŶηϭϳϴ͘
» &ŝƌĞǁĂƚĞƌĂďŽǀĞŐƌŽƵŶĚƉŝƉŝŶŐĂŶĚĚĞǀŝĐĞƐĂƌĞƵŶŶ

ĚǁĂƌĚƐ^ĂĨĞƚLJZĞĚηϮϮϭ͘
» &ŝƌĞ,LJĚƌĂŶƚƐĂƌĞZƵƐƚŽůĞƵŵ^ĂĨĞƚLJzĞůůŽǁηϮϰϮϮϱϴ͘

3.1.7.5 Screening of Rooftop Mechanical
Equipment
ZŽŽŌŽƉŵĞĐŚĂŶŝĐĂůĞƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚƐŚĂůůďĞƐĐƌĞĞŶĞĚĨƌŽŵ
ƚŚĞǀŝĞǁŽĨĂůůĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚƉƵďůŝĐƌŝŐŚƚƐͲŽĨͲǁĂLJďLJƐĐƌĞĞŶƐ ŽƌǁĂůůƐĚĞƐŝŐŶĞĚǁŝƚŚĐŽŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂƌLJŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐĂŶĚ
ĐŽůŽƌƐƚŽƚŚĞďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ͘^ĐƌĞĞŶǁĂůůƐƐŚĂůůďĞǁŝƚŚŝŶ
ϮϬĨĞĞƚŽĨƌŽŽŌŽƉƉĂƌĂƉĞƚǁĂůůƐ͘
džĐĞƉƟŽŶƐƐŚĂůůďĞ
ƉĞƌŵŝƩĞĚĨŽƌƌŽŽŌŽƉƐǀŝƐŝďůĞĨƌŽŵƉƵďůŝĐƌŝŐŚƚƐͲŽĨͲǁĂLJ ƚŚĂƚĂƌĞƐŝŐŶŝĮĐĂŶƚůLJĂďŽǀĞƚŚĞƌŽŽŌŽƉĞůĞǀĂƟŽŶ͕ĂƐ
ĚĞƚĞƌŵŝŶĞĚďLJƚŚĞWůĂŶŶŝŶŐŝǀŝƐŝŽŶ͘

3.1.7.6 Stormwater Management
ůůďƵŝůĚŝŶŐĂŶĚƐŝƚĞĚĞƐŝŐŶƐŵƵƐƚƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐƚŽƌŵǁĂƚĞƌ
ƚƌĞĂƚŵĞŶƚŵĞĂƐƵƌĞƐƚŚĂƚŵĞĞƚĂůLJŝƚLJDƵŶŝĐŝƉĂů
ZĞŐŝŽŶĂůWĞƌŵŝƚƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ͘dŚĞƐĞĐĂŶŚĂǀĞ
ƐŝŐŶŝĮĐĂŶƚŝŵƉĂĐƚƐŽŶƐŝƚĞĚĞƐŝŐŶ͘dŚĞƌĞŐƵůĂƟŽŶƐ
ĂƌĞĐŽŵŵƵŶŝĐĂƚĞĚŚĞƌĞ͗ŚƩƉƐ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ĚĂůLJĐŝƚLJ͘ŽƌŐͬ
ƐƚŽƌŵǁĂƚĞƌ ͘

3.2 Building Design

3.2.1  Street Frontage
Intent
dŚĞďƵŝůĚŝŶŐĨƌŽŶƚĂŐĞƐĨĂĐŝŶŐƐƚƌĞĞƚƐĂŶĚƉƵďůŝĐ
ƌŝŐŚƚƐͲŽĨͲǁĂLJƐŚĂůůďĞĂƌƟĐƵůĂƚĞĚƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĂŶ
ŝŶŶŽǀĂƟǀĞĂŶĚƵŶŝĮĞĚĚĞƐŝŐŶƚŽƉĂƐƐĞƌƐͲďLJĂŶĚ
ŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌƐŝŶƚŚĞƐƵƌƌŽƵŶĚŝŶŐŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚ͘

3.2.1.1 Ground Floor Frontage
'ƌŽƵŶĚŇŽŽƌďƵŝůĚŝŶŐĨƌŽŶƚĂŐĞƐƐŚĂůůŝŶĐůƵĚĞƚǁŽŽƌ
ŵŽƌĞŽĨƚŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐĚĞƐŝŐŶĂƉƉƌŽĂĐŚĞƐ͗
»
ŶƚƌLJƚŚĂƚŝƐƌĞĐĞƐƐĞĚŝŶƚŽƚŚĞǁĂůůĂŵŝŶŝŵƵŵŽĨ
ƚŚƌĞĞĨĞĞƚ͘
» WƌŽǀŝĚĞĚǁŝƚŚĂĐŽǀĞƌĞĚĞŶƚƌLJƉŽƌĐŚĂĐĐĞƐƐĞĚĨƌŽŵ
ƚŚĞƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬ͘
» ^ƚŽŽƉƐŽƌƉŽƌĐŚĞƐĂƚĞǀĞƌLJƉƵďůŝĐĂŶĚƉƌŝǀĂƚĞ
ƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂůĞŶƚƌLJƐŚĂůůďĞĞůĞǀĂƚĞĚĂƚůĞĂƐƚϮϰŝŶĐŚĞƐ
ĂďŽǀĞƚŚĞƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬ͘
» ĐŽƵƌƚLJĂƌĚŽĨĂƚůĞĂƐƚϮϬϬƐƋƵĂƌĞĨĞĞƚ͕ĂĐĐĞƐƐĞĚ
ĨƌŽŵƚŚĞƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬ͕ǁŝƚŚĚŝƌĞĐƚĞŶƚƌLJŽƌĞŶƚƌŝĞƐŝŶƚŽ
ƚŚĞďƵŝůĚŝŶŐĨƌŽŵƚŚĞĐŽƵƌƚLJĂƌĚ͘
»
ŶƚƌLJǁĂLJƐĂĐĐĞŶƚĞĚďLJĂĐŚĂŶŐĞŝŶĞdžƚĞƌŶĂůďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ
ŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůŽƌĂƉƉůŝĐĂƟŽŶŽĨĂŶŽŶͲƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĂůĂĐĐĞŶƚ͘
» ǁŶŝŶŐƐŽƌĐĂŶŽƉŝĞƐŽǀĞƌĂůůĞŶƚƌŝĞƐ͘
» /ŶƚĞŐƌĂƟŽŶŽĨĂĐŽŶƟŶƵŽƵƐĂƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂůƐŚĂĚĞ
ĨĞĂƚƵƌĞƐƉĂŶŶŝŶŐĂƚůĞĂƐƚϱϬƉĞƌĐĞŶƚŽĨƚŚĞďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ
ĨƌŽŶƚĂŐĞ͘

30 SINGLE-FAMILY AND MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS City of Daly City 3. Objective Design Standards for Multi-Family Residential Developments » tŝŶĚŽǁƐĨĂĐŝŶŐƚŚĞƐƚƌĞĞƚŽƌƉƵďůŝĐƌŝŐŚƚͲŽĨͲǁĂLJĂƚ
ƚŚĞŐƌŽƵŶĚŇŽŽƌƐŚĂůůŚĂǀĞƚƌĂŶƐƉĂƌĞŶƚŐůĂƐƐĂŶĚ
ƐŚĂůůďĞĂŵŝŶŝŵƵŵŽĨϭϮƐƋƵĂƌĞĨĞĞƚĞĂĐŚ͘dŚĞƌĞ
ƐŚĂůůďĞĂƚůĞĂƐƚŽŶĞǁŝŶĚŽǁŽĨƚŚŝƐƐŝnjĞĂƚĞǀĞƌLJϯϬ
ĨĞĞƚŽĨďƵŝůĚŝŶŐĨƌŽŶƚĂŐĞ͘

3.2.2  Massing and Articulation
Intent

ŶƐƵƌĞĞĂĐŚŶĞǁďƵŝůĚŝŶŐďĞĐŽŵĞƐĂŶĂƩƌĂĐƟǀĞ͕
ĐŽŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂƌLJĂĚĚŝƟŽŶƚŽŝƚƐƐƵƌƌŽƵŶĚŝŶŐƐďLJ
ŵŽĚĞƌĂƟŶŐŝƚƐĂƉƉĂƌĞŶƚƐŝnjĞĂŶĚƐĐĂůĞ͘EĞǁ
ƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞƐǁŝůůĂĐŚŝĞǀĞƚŚŝƐŶĂƚƵƌĂůĮƚƚŚƌŽƵŐŚ
ĐŽŶƚĞdžƚͲƌĞƐƉŽŶƐŝǀĞĨŽƌŵĂŶĚĂǀĂƌŝĞƚLJŽĨŵĞƚŚŽĚƐ
ƚŽďƌĞĂŬĚŽǁŶůĂƌŐĞĨĂĕĂĚĞƐ͘

3.2.2.1 Massing Breaks
ƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐƚŚƌĞĞƐƚŽƌŝĞƐŽƌŐƌĞĂƚĞƌƐŚĂůůŝŶĐŽƌƉŽƌĂƚĞŽŶĞ ŽƌŵŽƌĞŽĨƚŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ͗
» ^ƚĞƉͲďĂĐŬĂůŽŶŐƉƌŝŵĂƌLJĨĂĕade:tĂůůƐƐŚĂůůƐƚĞƉ
ďĂĐŬĂŵŝŶŝŵƵŵĚĞƉƚŚŽĨĮǀĞĨĞĞƚĨŽƌĂƚůĞĂƐƚϳϱ
ƉĞƌĐĞŶƚŽĨƚŚĞĨĂĕĂĚĞĨŽƌŇŽŽƌƐĂďŽǀĞƚŚĞĨŽƵƌƚŚ
ŇŽŽƌ͕ŵĞĂƐƵƌĞĚĨƌŽŵƚŚĞƉƌŝŵĂƌLJĨĂĕĂĚĞƉůĂŶĞ͘
»
&ĂĕĂĚĞƌƟĐƵůĂƟŽŶ͗ůůƐƚƌĞĞƚͲĨĂĐŝŶŐĨĂĕĂĚĞƐƐŚĂůů
ŝŶĐůƵĚĞĂƚůĞĂƐƚŽŶĞĐŚĂŶŐĞŝŶƉůĂŶĞ;ƉƌŽũĞĐƟŽŶŽƌ
ƌĞĐĞƐƐͿĂƚůĞĂƐƚƚǁŽĨĞĞƚŝŶĚĞƉƚŚĂŶĚĨŽƵƌĨĞĞƚŝŶ
ǁŝĚƚŚ͕ŽƌƚǁŽĐŚĂŶŐĞƐŝŶƉůĂŶĞĂƚůĞĂƐƚŽŶĞĨŽŽƚŝŶ
ĚĞƉƚŚĂŶĚϮ͘ϱĨĞĞƚŝŶǁŝĚƚŚ͕ĨŽƌĞǀĞƌLJϭϬϬůŝŶĞĂƌĨĞĞƚ ŽĨǁĂůů͘^ƵĐŚĨĞĂƚƵƌĞƐƐŚĂůůĞdžƚĞŶĚƚŚĞĨƵůůŚĞŝŐŚƚŽĨ ƚŚĞƌĞƐƉĞĐƟǀĞĨĂĕĂĚĞŽĨĂďƵŝůĚŝŶŐĨƌŽŵĞŝƚŚĞƌƚŚĞ
ŐƌŽƵŶĚůĞǀĞůŽƌƚŚĞŇŽŽƌĂďŽǀĞŐƌŽƵŶĚůĞǀĞů͕ƚŽƚŚĞ
ƚŽƉŽĨƚŚĞǁĂůů͘
»
hƉƉĞƌͲ&ůŽŽƌWƌŽũĞĐƟŽŶƐ͗
• ƉƌŽũĞĐƟŽŶŽƌĐĂŶƟůĞǀĞƌĂƚƚŚĞƵƉƉĞƌŇŽŽƌƐŽĨ
ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐŽĨƵƉƚŽĨŽƵƌĨĞĞƚŝŶƚŽƉƵďůŝĐƌŝŐŚƚͲŽĨͲ
ǁĂLJ͕ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƟŽŶŝƐĂƚůĞĂƐƚϭϮĨĞĞƚ
ĐůĞĂƌĂďŽǀĞƚŚĞůĞǀĞůŽĨƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬ͕ĮǀĞĨĞĞƚĐůĞĂƌ
ĨƌŽŵƚŚĞĨĂĐĞŽĨĐƵƌď͕ĂŶĚĚŽĞƐŶŽƚŝŵƉĂĐƚĂŶLJ
ďĞůŽǁͲŽƌĂďŽǀĞͲŐƌŽƵŶĚƵƟůŝƟĞƐ͘ŶLJďĞůŽǁͲŽƌ
ĂďŽǀĞͲŐƌŽƵŶĚƵƟůŝƟĞƐƚŚĂƚĂƌĞŝŵƉĂĐƚĞĚĚƵĞƚŽ
ƵƉƉĞƌͲŇŽŽƌƉƌŽũĞĐƟŽŶƐƐŚĂůůďĞƌĞůŽĐĂƚĞĚďLJƚŚĞ
developer .
• ĂůĐŽŶŝĞƐŵĂLJƉƌŽũĞĐƚŶŽŵŽƌĞƚŚĂŶϰ͘ϱĨĞĞƚĨƌŽŵ
ƚŚĞǁĂůůƉůĂŶĞ͘
• ĂůĐŽŶŝĞƐĂŶĚĚĞĐŬƐĨĂĐŝŶŐƉƵďůŝĐƐƚƌĞĞƚƐƐŚĂůů
ŚĂǀĞǁĂůůƐŽƌƌĂŝůŝŶŐƐƚŚĂƚĂƌĞĂƚůĞĂƐƚϱϬƉĞƌĐĞŶƚ
ǀŝƐƵĂůůLJŽƉĞŶ͘
^ƚĞƉďĂĐŬ
&ĂĐĂĚĞƌƟĐƵůĂƟŽŶ

SINGLE-FAMILY AND MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS 31 City of Daly City 3. Objective Design Standards for Multi-Family Residential Developments

3.2.2.2 Building Composition
ƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐŽĨƚŚƌĞĞƐƚŽƌŝĞƐŽƌŵŽƌĞƐŚĂůůŚĂǀĞĂĐůĞĂƌůLJ ĚĞĮŶĞĚďĂƐĞĂŶĚƌŽŽĨĞĚŐĞƐŽƚŚĂƚƚŚĞĨĂĕĂĚĞŚĂƐĂ
ĚŝƐƟŶĐƚďĂƐĞ͕ŵŝĚĚůĞ͕ĂŶĚƚŽƉ͘

ůĞŵĞŶƚƐƚŽĂƌƟĐƵůĂƚĞĂďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ͛ƐĨĂĕĂĚĞƐŚĂůůŝŶĐůƵĚĞ͗ » dŚĞƚŽƉŽĨƚŚĞďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐŚĂůůŚĂǀĞŽŶĞŽƌŵŽƌĞŽĨ
ƚŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐ͗ĂĐŽƌŶŝĐĞůŝŶĞǁŝƚŚŵŝŶŝŵƵŵƐŝdžͲŝŶĐŚ
ŽǀĞƌŚĂŶŐ͕ĂƉĂƌĂƉĞƚǁŝƚŚŵŝŶŝŵƵŵƐŝdžͲŝŶĐŚĐĂƉ͕
ĞĂǀĞƐǁŝƚŚďƌĂĐŬĞƚƐŽƌŽƚŚĞƌĚĞƚĂŝůŝŶŐ͕ĂƌĞĐĞƐƐĞĚ
ƉĂƌĂƉĞƚďĞŚŝŶĚƚŚĞƚŽƉŽĨƚŚĞďƵŝůĚŝŶŐǁĂůů͕Ă
ĐŚĂŶŐĞŝŶŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůŽƌĐŽůŽƌĂƚƚŚĞƚŽƉŇŽŽƌ͕Žƌ
ƵƉƉĞƌŇŽŽƌƐƚĞƉͲďĂĐŬƐ͘ƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐŽŶĐŽƌŶĞƌůŽƚƐ
ƐŚĂůůŝŶĐŽƌƉŽƌĂƚĞĂƚŽǁĞƌĞůĞŵĞŶƚƚŚĂƚƐŝƚƐƉƌŽƵĚ
ŽĨĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚŚŽƌŝnjŽŶƚĂůƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ͕ƵŶůĞƐƐƚŚŝƐŝƐ
ĚĞƚĞƌŵŝŶĞĚƵŶŶĞĐĞƐƐĂƌLJďLJƚŚĞWůĂŶŶŝŶŐŝǀŝƐŝŽŶ
ĚƵĞƚŽƚŚĞďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ͛ƐĂƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂůƐƚLJůĞ͘dŚĞƚŽǁĞƌ
ĞůĞŵĞŶƚƐŚĂůůďĞĂƚĂŚĞŝŐŚƚĂŶĚĚĞƐŝŐŶƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĂ
ƐŝŐŶŝĮĐĂŶƚĨŽĐĂůƉŽŝŶƚĨŽƌƚŚĞďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ͘
» dŚĞŵŝĚĚůĞŽƌďŽĚLJŽĨƚŚĞďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐŚĂůůŚĂǀĞĂ
ĨĂĕĂĚĞŵĂĚĞƵƉŽĨƌĞŐƵůĂƌĐŽŵƉŽŶĞŶƚƐ͕ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐ
ŽŶĞŽƌŵŽƌĞŽĨƚŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐ͗ĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚǁŝŶĚŽǁ
ƉĂƩĞƌŶ͕ƌĞƉĞĂƟŶŐďĂLJǁŝŶĚŽǁƐ͕ƌĞŐƵůĂƌůLJƐƉĂĐĞĚ
ƉŝůĂƐƚĞƌƐ͕ƌĞĐĞƐƐĞƐ͕ŽƌŽƚŚĞƌǀĞƌƟĐĂůĞůĞŵĞŶƚƐ͘
» dŚĞďĂƐĞŽĨƚŚĞďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐŚĂůůŚĂǀĞŽŶĞŽƌŵŽƌĞŽĨ
ƚŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐ͗ƌĞĐĞƐƐĞĚŐƌŽƵŶĚŇŽŽƌ͕ĂĐŽŶƟŶƵŽƵƐ
ŚŽƌŝnjŽŶĂůĞůĞŵĞŶƚƚŚĂƚƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐĂŵŝŶŝŵƵŵŽĨ
ϭϮŝŶĐŚĞƐĂƚƚŚĞƚŽƉŽĨƚŚĞŐƌŽƵŶĚŇŽŽƌ͕ĂŶĚͬ
ŽƌĞŶŚĂŶĐĞĚǁŝŶĚŽǁŽƌĞŶƚƌLJĞůĞŵĞŶƚƐƐƵĐŚĂƐ
ĂǁŶŝŶŐƐŽƌĐĂŶŽƉŝĞƐ͘ƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐƐŝƚƵĂƚĞĚŽŶĐŽƌŶĞƌ
ůŽƚƐƐŚĂůůŝŶĐŽƌƉŽƌĂƚĞĂŶĞŶƚƌĂŶĐĞĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚƚŽƚŚĞ
ƐƚƌĞĞƚĐŽƌŶĞƌ͕ƵŶůĞƐƐƚŚŝƐŝƐĚĞƚĞƌŵŝŶĞĚƵŶŶĞĐĞƐƐĂƌLJ
ďLJƚŚĞWůĂŶŶŝŶŐŝǀŝƐŝŽŶĚƵĞƚŽƚŚĞďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ͛Ɛ
ĂƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂůƐƚLJůĞ͘
» dŚĞĞůĞŵĞŶƚƐĐŽŵƉƌŝƐŝŶŐƚŚĞďĂƐĞ͕ŵŝĚĚůĞ͕ĂŶĚƚŽƉ
ŽĨƚŚĞďƵŝůĚŝŶŐŵĂLJďĞŝŶƚĞƌƌƵƉƚĞĚďLJĂƉƌŽƚƌƵĚŝŶŐ
ǀĞƌƟĐĂůĞůĞŵĞŶƚƐƵĐŚĂƐĂƚŽǁĞƌŽƌĂƌĞĐĞƐƐĞĚ
ǀĞƌƟĐĂůĞůĞŵĞŶƚƐƵĐŚĂƐĂŵĂƐƐŝŶŐďƌĞĂŬ͕ĂŶĞŶƚƌLJ͕
ŽƌĂĐŽƵƌƚLJĂƌĚ͘
ƵŝůĚŝŶŐŽŵƉŽƐŝƟŽŶ
ZŽŽŇŝŶĞsĂƌŝĂƟŽŶ

3.2.2.3 Roofline Variation
» ZŽŽŇŝŶĞƌŝĚŐĞƐĂŶĚƉĂƌĂƉĞƚƐƐŚĂůůŶŽƚƌƵŶƵŶďƌŽŬĞŶ
ĨŽƌŵŽƌĞƚŚĂŶϭϬϬĨĞĞƚ͘sĂƌŝĂƟŽŶĨŽƌƌŽŽĨƐƐŚĂůůďĞ
ĂĐĐŽŵƉůŝƐŚĞĚďLJĐŚĂŶŐŝŶŐƚŚĞƌŽŽĨŚĞŝŐŚƚ͕ŽīƐĞƚƐ͕
ĚŝƌĞĐƟŽŶŽĨƐůŽƉĞ͕ĂŶĚďLJŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐĞůĞŵĞŶƚƐ
ƐƵĐŚĂƐĚŽƌŵĞƌƐ͘sĂƌŝĂƟŽŶĨŽƌƉĂƌĂƉĞƚƐƐŚĂůůďĞ
ĂĐĐŽŵƉůŝƐŚĞĚďLJƌĂŝƐŝŶŐĂƐĞĐƟŽŶŽĨƚŚĞƉĂƌĂƉĞƚ
ŚŝŐŚĞƌ͕ŝŶƚĞƌƌƵƉƟŶŐĂƌƵŶŽĨƉĂƌĂƉĞƚǁŝƚŚĂƚĂůůĞƌ
ǀŽůƵŵĞƐƵĐŚĂƐĂƚŽǁĞƌ͕ŽƌĂĐŚĂŶŐĞŝŶƚŚĞĚĞƐŝŐŶŽƌ
ŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůŽĨƚŚĞƉĂƌĂƉĞƚŽƌŶĂŵĞŶƚĂƟŽŶ͘

32 SINGLE-FAMILY AND MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS City of Daly City 3. Objective Design Standards for Multi-Family Residential Developments

3.2.3  Architectural Detailing
Intent
WƌŽǀŝĚĞĂƌƟĐƵůĂƟŽŶƚŽďƵŝůĚŝŶŐĨĂĕĂĚĞƐĂŶĚƌŽŽĨƐ
ƚŚƌŽƵŐŚĂǀĂƌŝĞƚLJŽĨĂƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂůĚĞƐŝŐŶĨĞĂƚƵƌĞƐ͘
ĞƐŝŐŶĂŶĚůŽĐĂƚĞǁŝŶĚŽǁƐƐŽƚŚĂƚƚŚĞLJƉƌŽǀŝĚĞ
ǁĞůůͲƉƌŽƉŽƌƟŽŶĞĚĂƌƟĐƵůĂƟŽŶƚŽďƵŝůĚŝŶŐĨĂĕĂĚĞƐ͘

3.2.3.1 Architectural Roof Details
» tŚĞƌĞďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐŚĂǀĞĂƚƌĂĚŝƟŽŶĂůĂƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂů
ƐƚLJůĞ͕ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐǁĂůůƐĂůŽŶŐƚŚĞƐƚƌĞĞƚĨƌŽŶƚĂŐĞƐŚĂůů
ŚĂǀĞĂƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂůĚĞƚĂŝů;Ğ͘Ő͕͘ďƌĂĐŬĞƚƐ͕ƌĂŌĞƌƚĂŝůƐ͕ ĚĞŶƟůƐ͕ŽƌŽƚŚĞƌƌĞƉĞĂƟŶŐĞůĞŵĞŶƚƐͿĂƚƚŚĞĐŽƌŶŝĐĞ
ŽƌƌŽŽĨĞĂǀĞ͘tŚĞƌĞďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐŚĂǀĞĂĐŽŶƚĞŵƉŽƌĂƌLJ
ĂƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂůƐƚLJůĞ͕ƚŚĞƚŽƉŽĨƚŚĞǁĂůůŵĂLJďĞ
ĞdžƉƌĞƐƐĞĚƚŚƌŽƵŐŚƚŚĞƵƐĞŽĨĂĐůĞĂŶƐƚƵĐĐŽĚĞƚĂŝůŽƌ
ĂƌĞĐĞƐƐ͘
džƉŽƐĞĚ͕ƉĂŝŶƚĞĚ͕ŽƌƵŶƉĂŝŶƚĞĚƐŚĞĞƚŵĞƚĂů
ŇĂƐŚŝŶŐĂƚƚŚĞƚŽƉŽĨƚŚĞǁĂůůŝƐŶŽƚĂůůŽǁĞĚ͘
» ůůƌŽŽĨͲŵŽƵŶƚĞĚŵĞĐŚĂŶŝĐĂů͕ĞůĞĐƚƌŝĐĂů͕ĂŶĚĞdžƚĞƌŶĂů ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝĐĂƟŽŶĞƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚ͕ƐƵĐŚĂƐƐĂƚĞůůŝƚĞĚŝƐŚĞƐ
ĂŶĚŵŝĐƌŽǁĂǀĞƚŽǁĞƌƐ͕ƐŚĂůůďĞƐĐƌĞĞŶĞĚĨƌŽŵƉƵďůŝĐ
ǀŝĞǁĂŶĚĂƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂůůLJŝŶƚĞŐƌĂƚĞĚŝŶƚŽƚŚĞďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ
ĚĞƐŝŐŶĂŶĚĐŽŶƐŽůŝĚĂƚĞĚƚŽĂŵŝŶŝŵĂůŶƵŵďĞƌŽĨ
ůŽĐĂƟŽŶƐ͘
» sĞŶƚƉŝƉĞƚĞƌŵŝŶĂƟŽŶƐĂƚƚŚĞƌŽŽĨƐŚĂůůďĞ
ĐŽŶƐŽůŝĚĂƚĞĚĂŶĚůŽĐĂƚĞĚŽŶƌŽŽĨĂƌĞĂƐŶŽƚǀŝƐŝďůĞ
ĨƌŽŵƚŚĞƐƚƌĞĞƚƚŽƚŚĞŵĂdžŝŵƵŵĞdžƚĞŶƚĨĞĂƐŝďůĞ͘
sĞŶƚƉŝƉĞƐƚŚĂƚĂƌĞǀŝƐŝďůĞĨƌŽŵƐƚƌĞĞƚƐ͕ƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬƐ͕
ƉůĂnjĂƐ͕ĂŶĚĐŽƵƌƚLJĂƌĚƐƐŚĂůůďĞƉĂŝŶƚĞĚƚŽŵĂƚĐŚƚŚĞ
ĐŽůŽƌŽĨƚŚĞƌŽŽĨƚŽŵĂŬĞƚŚĞŵůĞƐƐĐŽŶƐƉŝĐƵŽƵƐ͘
» ůůƌŽŽĨƐƐŚĂůůŝŶĐůƵĚĞŐƵƩĞƌƐͬĚŽǁŶƐƉŽƵƚƐƚŚĂƚ͗
• ƌĂŝŶĚŝƌĞĐƚůLJŝŶƚŽĂĐŝƐƚĞƌŶ͕ůĂŶĚƐĐĂƉĞĚĂƌĞĂ͕Žƌ
ƐƚŽƌŵĚƌĂŝŶƐLJƐƚĞŵ͘
• DĂƚĐŚƚŚĞƚƌŝŵŽƌďŽĚLJĐŽůŽƌŽĨƚŚĞĨĂĕĂĚĞ͘
• ƌĞŝŶĐŽŶƐƉŝĐƵŽƵƐůLJůŽĐĂƚĞĚ͕ƵŶůĞƐƐĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚ
ǁŝƚŚƚŚĞĚĞƐŝŐŶŽĨƚŚĞďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ͛ƐĂƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂů
ƐƚLJůĞ;Ğ͘Ő͕͘^ƉĂŶŝƐŚZĞǀŝǀĂůͿ͘

3.2.3.2 Architectural Design Features on
Elevations
ƚůĞĂƐƚŽŶĞĂƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂůĚĞƐŝŐŶĨĞĂƚƵƌĞĨƌŽŵƚŚĞ
ĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐůŝƐƚƐŚĂůůďĞŝŶƚĞŐƌĂƚĞĚŝŶƚŽĂůůĞůĞǀĂƟŽŶƐŽĨ ĂďƵŝůĚŝŶŐĨĂĐŝŶŐĂƉƌŝŵĂƌLJŽƌƐĞĐŽŶĚĂƌLJƐƚƌĞĞƚ͕ŽƌĂ
ĐŽŵŵŽŶŽƉĞŶƐƉĂĐĞ͗
» WƌŽũĞĐƟŶŐŽƌďĂLJǁŝŶĚŽǁƚƌĞĂƚŵĞŶƚƐ
» ƌŽǁƐŽƌŽǀĞƌŚĂŶŐƐŽǀĞƌǁŝŶĚŽǁƐ
» ĂŶŽƉŝĞƐŽƌĂǁŶŝŶŐƐŽǀĞƌĚŽŽƌƐ
» WƌŽũĞĐƟŶŐĞĂǀĞƐŽĨϮϰĨĞĞƚŽƌŵŽƌĞ
» Balconies
ŶĞdžĂŵƉůĞŽĨĂďƵŝůĚŝŶŐĨĂĐĂĚĞǁŝƚŚĂĐůĞĂƌůLJĚĞĮŶĞĚďĂƐĞ͕ ŵŝĚĚůĞ͕ĂŶĚƚŽƉĞůĞŵĞŶƚƐ͘
ƵŝůĚŝŶŐĂƉƉůLJŝŶŐĂƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂůĚĞƐŝŐŶĨĞĂƚƵƌĞƐƐƵĐŚĂƐ ǁŝŶĚŽǁŽǀĞƌŚĂŶŐƐĂŶĚďĂůĐŽŶŝĞƐ͘

SINGLE-FAMILY AND MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS 33 City of Daly City 3. Objective Design Standards for Multi-Family Residential Developments

3.2.3.3 Windows
» ZĞĐĞƐƐͬdƌŝŵ͘ůůŝŶĚŝǀŝĚƵĂůǁŝŶĚŽǁŽƉĞŶŝŶŐƐĂůŽŶŐ
ƐƚƌĞĞƚĨƌŽŶƚĂŐĞƐƐŚĂůůĞŝƚŚĞƌďĞƌĞĐĞƐƐĞĚƚǁŽŝŶĐŚĞƐ
ŵŝŶŝŵƵŵŽƌƐƵƌƌŽƵŶĚĞĚďLJƚƌŝŵĂƚůĞĂƐƚĨŽƵƌŝŶĐŚĞƐ
ŝŶǁŝĚƚŚĂŶĚƚǁŽŝŶĐŚĞƐŝŶĚĞƉƚŚ͘
»
^ƚƌĞĞƚ&ƌŽŶƚĂŐĞ͘ƵŝůĚŝŶŐǁĂůůƐĂůŽŶŐĂůůƐƚƌĞĞƚ
ĨƌŽŶƚĂŐĞƐƐŚĂůůŚĂǀĞǁŝŶĚŽǁƐĂƚĂůůŇŽŽƌƐĂďŽǀĞ
ŐƌŽƵŶĚůĞǀĞů͘ŽŶƟŶƵŽƵƐďůĂŶŬǁĂůůƐŽĨŐƌĞĂƚĞƌƚŚĂŶ
ϯϬĨĞĞƚŝŶůĞŶŐƚŚĂƌĞŶŽƚĂůůŽǁĞĚ͘
»
KƌŝĞŶƚĂƟŽŶĂŶĚWƌŽƉŽƌƟŽŶ͘ƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐƐŚĂůůŝŶĐůƵĚĞ
ǀĞƌƟĐĂůůLJĂůŝŐŶĞĚ͕ŽƌŝĞŶƚĞĚ͕ĂŶĚƉƌŽƉŽƌƟŽŶĞĚĨĂĕĂĚĞ
ŽƉĞŶŝŶŐƐǁŝƚŚǁŝŶĚŽǁƐƚŚĂƚŚĂǀĞĂŐƌĞĂƚĞƌŚĞŝŐŚƚ
ƚŚĂŶǁŝĚƚŚ;ĂŶĂƉƉƌŽƉƌŝĂƚĞǀĞƌƟĐĂůͬŚŽƌŝnjŽŶƚĂů
ƌĂƟŽƌĂŶŐĞƐĨƌŽŵϭ͘ϱ͗ϭƚŽϮ͗ϭͿ͘tŚĞƌĞůĂƌŐĞƌ
ŚŽƌŝnjŽŶƚĂůŽƉĞŶŝŶŐƐĂƌĞƵƐĞĚ͕ƚŚĞLJƐŚĂůůďĞĚŝǀŝĚĞĚ
ŝŶƚŽŵƵůƟƉůĞŐƌŽƵƉƐŽĨǀĞƌƟĐĂůǁŝŶĚŽǁƐ͘^ŵĂůůĞƌ
ǁŝŶĚŽǁƐŝŶƵƟůŝƚLJĂƌĞĂƐŽƌďĂƚŚƌŽŽŵƐŵĂLJďĞ
ŚŽƌŝnjŽŶƚĂůůLJƉƌŽƉŽƌƟŽŶĞĚ͘ĞǀŝĂƟŽŶƐĨƌŽŵǀĞƌƟĐĂů
ĂůŝŐŶŵĞŶƚƐŚĂůůďĞƉĞƌŵŝƩĞĚŽŶůLJŝŶŝŶƐƚĂŶĐĞƐ
ǁŚĞƌĞƐƵĐŚĚĞǀŝĂƟŽŶŝƐƉƵƌƉŽƐĞĨƵůƚŽƚŚĞďĞŶĞĮƚŽĨ
ĂƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂůƐƚLJůĞ͕ĂƐĚĞƚĞƌŵŝŶĞĚďLJƚŚĞWůĂŶŶŝŶŐ
Division.
»
DĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐ͘ůůǁŝŶĚŽǁƐƐŚĂůůďĞŵĞƚĂů͕ǁŽŽĚĐůĂĚ͕
ŽƌĮďĞƌŐůĂƐƐ͘sŝŶLJůǁŝŶĚŽǁƐŵĂLJďĞƵƐĞĚĂďŽǀĞ
ƚŚĞŐƌŽƵŶĚŇŽŽƌ͕ŝĨƚŚĞLJĂƌĞĐŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂůŐƌĂĚĞ
ĂĐĐĞƉƚĂďůĞƚŽŝƚLJƐƚĂī͘
»
'ůĂnjŝŶŐ͘'ůĂƐƐƐŚĂůůďĞĐůĞĂƌǁŝƚŚĂŵŝŶŝŵƵŵŽĨϴϴ
ƉĞƌĐĞŶƚůŝŐŚƚƚƌĂŶƐŵŝƐƐŝŽŶ͘DŝƌƌŽƌĞĚĂŶĚĚĞĞƉůLJ
ƟŶƚĞĚŐůĂƐƐŽƌĂƉƉůŝĞĚĮůŵƐƚŚĂƚĐƌĞĂƚĞŵŝƌƌŽƌĞĚ
ǁŝŶĚŽǁƐĂŶĚĐƵƌƚĂŝŶǁĂůůƐĂƌĞƉƌŽŚŝďŝƚĞĚ͘dŽĂĚĚ
ƉƌŝǀĂĐLJĂŶĚĂĞƐƚŚĞƟĐǀĂƌŝĞƚLJƚŽŐůĂƐƐ͕ĨƌŝƩĞĚŐůĂƐƐ͕
ƐƉĂŶĚƌĞůŐůĂƐƐ͕ĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌĚĞĐŽƌĂƟǀĞƚƌĞĂƚŵĞŶƚƐĂƌĞ
ĂƉƉƌŽƉƌŝĂƚĞ͘
»
DƵůůŝŽŶƐĂŶĚDƵŶƟŶƐ͘tŝŶĚŽǁƐŵĂLJŚĂǀĞƚƌƵĞ
ĚŝǀŝĚĞĚůŝƚĞƐŽƌƐŝŵƵůĂƚĞĚĚŝǀŝĚĞĚůŝƚĞƐǁŝƚŚƐƵƌĨĂĐĞ
ŵƵŶƟŶƐ͕ŽƌŵƵůůŝŽŶƐ͕ǁŝƚŚĂŵŝŶŝŵƵŵƚŚŝĐŬŶĞƐƐŽĨĂ
ŚĂůĨͲŝŶĐŚ͘^ŶĂƉͲŝŶŵƵŶƟŶƐƐŚĂůůŶŽƚďĞƵƐĞĚ͘

3.2.4  Building Materials and
Finishes
Intent
ĐĐĞŶƚƵĂƚĞďƵŝůĚŝŶŐĚĞƐŝŐŶƚŚƌŽƵŐŚƋƵĂůŝƚLJ
ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐĂŶĚĂƩƌĂĐƟǀĞĮŶŝƐŚĞƐ͘

3.2.4.1 Appropriate Building Materials
» ƚƚŚĞďĂƐĞŽĨƚŚĞďƵŝůĚŝŶŐĂůŽŶŐƉƵďůŝĐƌŝŐŚƚƐͲ
ŽĨͲǁĂLJ͕ŚŝŐŚͲƋƵĂůŝƚLJ͕ĚƵƌĂďůĞ͕ĂŶĚĞĂƐLJͲƚŽͲĐůĞĂŶ
ŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐĂŶĚĮŶŝƐŚĞƐƐŚĂůůďĞƵƐĞĚ͕ƐƵĐŚĂƐƐƚŽŶĞ͕
ďƌŝĐŬ͕ĐĞŵĞŶƟƟŽƵƐďŽĂƌĚ͕ŐůĂƐƐ͕ŵĞƚĂůƉĂŶĞůƐ͕
ĐĞƌĂŵŝĐƟůĞƐ͕ƉŽƵƌĞĚͲŝŶͲƉůĂĐĞĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞ͕ĂŶĚƐŵŽŽƚŚͲ
ƚƌŽǁĞůĞĚƉůĂƐƚĞƌĮŶŝƐŚĞƐ͘tŝŶĚŽǁƐĂŶĚĚŽŽƌƐƐŚĂůů
ďĞĨƌĂŵĞĚŝŶĂůƵŵŝŶƵŵŽƌŽƚŚĞƌĚƵƌĂďůĞŵĂƚĞƌŝĂů
ʹǀŝŶLJůŝƐŶŽƚĂůůŽǁĞĚ͘
» ďŽǀĞƚŚĞŐƌŽƵŶĚŇŽŽƌ͕ĮŶŝƐŚŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐƐŚĂůůďĞ
ŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐƚŚĂƚĂƌĞŚŝŐŚƋƵĂůŝƚLJĂŶĚĚƵƌĂďůĞ͕ƐƵĐŚĂƐ
ĐĞŵĞŶƟƟŽƵƐďŽĂƌĚ͕ƉůĂƐƚĞƌŽƌƐƚƵĐĐŽ͕ĐĞƌĂŵŝĐƟůĞƐ
;ĂƐĂƐĞĐŽŶĚĂƌLJŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůͿ͕ĮŶŝƐŚĞĚĂŶĚƉĂŝŶƚĞĚǁŽŽĚ
ŽƌĐŽŵƉŽƐŝƚĞƚƌŝŵ͕ŽƌĚƵƌĂďůĞƐŚĞĞƚŵĞƚĂů͘tŝŶĚŽǁƐ
ĂŶĚĚŽŽƌƐƐŚĂůůďĞǁŽŽĚ͕ĂůƵŵŝŶƵŵ͕ĐŽƉƉĞƌ͕ƐƚĞĞů͕
ĐŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂůͲŐƌĂĚĞǀŝŶLJů͕ŽƌĮďĞƌŐůĂƐƐ͘
» ƵĞƚŽĂůLJŝƚLJ͛ƐĐůŝŵĂƚĞ͕ĂůůŵĞƚĂůƵƐĞĚƐŚĂůůďĞ
ǁĞĂƚŚĞƌͲƌĞƐŝƐƚĂŶƚŵĞƚĂů͕ƐƵĐŚĂƐŐĂůǀĂŶŝnjĞĚŵĞƚĂů͕
njŝŶĐ͕ƐƚĂŝŶůĞƐƐƐƚĞĞů͕ŽƌŶŽŶͲĨĞƌƌŽƵƐŵĞƚĂůƐƐƵĐŚĂƐ
copper .
» /ĨƵƐĞĚ͕ďƌŝĐŬĂŶĚƐƚŽŶĞǀĞŶĞĞƌƐŚĂůůďĞŵŽƌƚĂƌĞĚ
ĂŶĚǁƌĂƉƉĞĚĂƌŽƵŶĚĐŽƌŶĞƌƐĂŵŝŶŝŵƵŵŽĨĨŽƵƌĨĞĞƚ
ƚŽŐŝǀĞƚŚĞĂƉƉĞĂƌĂŶĐĞƚŚĂƚƚŚĞLJŚĂǀĞĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĂů
ĨƵŶĐƟŽŶĂŶĚŵŝŶŝŵŝnjĞĂǀĞŶĞĞƌĂƉƉĞĂƌĂŶĐĞ͘

3.2.4.2 Inappropriate Building Materials
dŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐĂƌĞŶŽƚƉĞƌŵŝƩĞĚŽŶĞdžƉŽƐĞĚ
ĨĂĕĂĚĞƐďĞĐĂƵƐĞƚŚĞLJĚŽŶŽƚƵƉŚŽůĚƚŚĞƋƵĂůŝƚLJŽƌ
ůŝĨĞƐƉĂŶƚŚĂƚŝƐĚĞƐŝƌĂďůĞĨŽƌŶĞǁĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͗
» DŝƌƌŽƌĞĚŐůĂƐƐ͕ƌĞŇĞĐƟǀĞŐůĂƐƐ͕ŽƌŚĞĂǀŝůLJƟŶƚĞĚŐůĂƐƐ » sŝŶLJůƐŝĚŝŶŐ
» sĞƌƟĐĂůǁŽŽĚƐŚĞĂƚŚŝŶŐƐƵĐŚĂƐdϭͲϭϭ
» WůLJǁŽŽĚŽƌƐŝŵŝůĂƌǁŽŽĚ

34 SINGLE-FAMILY AND MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS City of Daly City 3. Objective Design Standards for Multi-Family Residential Developments

3.2.4.3 Other Material Requirements
» ,ŽƵƐŝŶŐĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐƐƵƌƌŽƵŶĚĞĚŽŶƚǁŽ
ŽƌŵŽƌĞƐŝĚĞƐďLJĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂůůŽƚƐƐŚĂůů
ŝŶĐŽƌƉŽƌĂƚĞĂƚůĞĂƐƚƚǁŽŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐŽƌĮŶŝƐŚĞƐĨŽƵŶĚ
ŽŶƐƵƌƌŽƵŶĚŝŶŐŚŽŵĞƐĂŶĚĂƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐ͘
»
džƉĂŶƐĞƐŽĨƐƚƵĐĐŽŽƌĐĞŵĞŶƚƉůĂƐƚĞƌůĂƌŐĞƌƚŚĂŶ
ϰϬϬƐƋƵĂƌĞĨĞĞƚŝŶĂƌĞĂƐŚĂůůďĞƐƵďĚŝǀŝĚĞĚǁŝƚŚ
ĞdžƉĂŶƐŝŽŶũŽŝŶƚƐ͕ƐĐŽƌŝŶŐ͕ƌĞǀĞĂůƐ͕ŽƌĐŚĂŶŐĞƐŝŶ
ƚĞdžƚƵƌĞĂŶĚĐŽůŽƌ ͘
» ƚůĞĂƐƚƚǁŽŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐĂŶĚĮŶŝƐŚĞƐŽĨƉƌŝŵĂƌLJ
ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐƐŚĂůůďĞƵƐĞĚŽŶĂůůďƵŝůĚŝŶŐĂĚĚŝƟŽŶƐ͘

3.2.4.4 Color
WƌŽũĞĐƚĂƉƉůŝĐĂŶƚƐƐŚĂůůƐƵďŵŝƚĐŽůŽƌƌĞŶĚĞƌŝŶŐƐƚŚĂƚ
ĚĞŵŽŶƐƚƌĂƚĞĐŽŵƉůŝĂŶĐĞǁŝƚŚƚŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ͗
» WƌŝŵĂƌLJĐŽůŽƌƐƐŚĂůůŶŽƚďĞƵƐĞĚĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚƚŽŶĂƚƵƌĂů ŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐƐƵĐŚĂƐƐƚŽŶĞ͕ǁŽŽĚ͕ŶĂƚƵƌĂůŵĞƚĂůƐ͕Žƌ
ƋƵĂůŝƚLJĂƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂůŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐ͕ƐƵĐŚĂƐƉƌĞĐĂƐƚ
ĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞ͕ďƌŝĐŬŵĂƐŽŶƌLJ͕ĂŶĚďĂƌƌĞůƟůĞ͘
» WƌŝŵĂƌLJĐŽůŽƌƐƐŚĂůůďĞůŝŵŝƚĞĚƚŽŽƌŶĂŵĞŶƚĂůĂŶĚ
ĂĐĐĞŶƚĞůĞŵĞŶƚƐ͘

3.3 Context Sensitivity

3.3.1  Adjacent to Existing
Residential Development
Intent
ĞƐŝŐŶŽĨŶĞǁĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƐŚŽƵůĚƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĨŽƌ
ůŝŐŚƚĂŶĚĂŝƌĂŶĚƌĞƐƉĞĐƚƉƌŝǀĂĐLJĨŽƌĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚ
ƐŝŶŐůĞͲĨĂŵŝůLJŚŽŵĞƐĂŶĚĚƵƉůĞdžĞƐ͘

3.3.1.1 Height Transitions
» ƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐĂďƵƫŶŐůŽƚƐnjŽŶĞĚZͲϭ;^ŝŶŐůĞͲĨĂŵŝůLJ
ZĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂůŝƐƚƌŝĐƚͿŽƌZͲϭͬ;^ŝŶŐůĞͲĨĂŵŝůLJͬƵƉůĞdž
ZĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂůŝƐƚƌŝĐƚͿĂŶĚŽǀĞƌƚŚƌĞĞƐƚŽƌŝĞƐŽƌϯϬĨĞĞƚ ŚŝŐŚ;ǁŚŝĐŚĞǀĞƌŝƐůĞƐƐĞƌͿ͕ƐŚĂůůďĞĚĞƐŝŐŶĞĚǁŝƚŚŽŶĞ ŽƌŵŽƌĞŚŽƌŝnjŽŶƚĂůƐƚĞƉͲďĂĐŬƐĨŽƌƚŚĞĞŶƟƌĞůĞŶŐƚŚŽĨ
ƚŚĞďƵŝůĚŝŶŐĨĂĕĂĚĞĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚƚŽƚŚĞZͲϭŽƌZͲϭͬůŽƚ͘
dŚŝƐƐƚĞƉďĂĐŬŝƐƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚƚŽƐƚĞƉďĂĐŬĂƚĂϰϱͲĚĞŐƌĞĞ
ĂŶŐůĞ͕ƐƚĂƌƟŶŐĨƌŽŵϯϬĨĞĞƚŚŝŐŚŽƌƚŚĞƚŽƉŽĨƚŚĞ
ƚŚŝƌĚƐƚŽƌLJƚŽĂŵĂdžŝŵƵŵĚĞƉƚŚŽĨϯϬĨĞĞƚĨƌŽŵƚŚĞ
ĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJůŝŶĞ͘dŚĞƐƚĞƉͲďĂĐŬĂƌĞĂŵĂLJďĞ
ƵƐĞĚĨŽƌƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂůƚĞƌƌĂĐĞƐ͘
» dŽǁĞƌƐŽƌŽƚŚĞƌƐŝŵŝůĂƌǀĞƌƟĐĂůĂƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂů
ĨĞĂƚƵƌĞƐ͕ƐƵĐŚĂƐƐƚĂŝƌǁĞůůƐ͕ĚŽŶŽƚƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĂƐƚĞƉͲ
ďĂĐŬďƵƚƐŚĂůůŶŽƚŽĐĐƵƉLJŵŽƌĞƚŚĂŶϮϬƉĞƌĐĞŶƚŽĨ
ƚŚĞĨĂĕĂĚĞ͘dŚĞůŽƐƐŽĨŵĂƐƐͬďƵůŬĨƌŽŵĂƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚ
ŚŽƌŝnjŽŶƚĂůƐƚĞƉͲďĂĐŬŵĂLJďĞƚƌĂŶƐĨĞƌƌĞĚƚŽĂďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ
ĨĂĕĂĚĞƚŚĂƚŝƐŶŽƚĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚƚŽŽƌĂĐƌŽƐƐƚŚĞƐƚƌĞĞƚ
ĨƌŽŵĂZͲϭͲŽƌZͲϭͬͲnjŽŶĞĚůŽƚ͕ďĞLJŽŶĚƚŚĞƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚ
ŵĂdžŝŵƵŵďƵŝůĚŝŶŐŚĞŝŐŚƚ͘
džĐĞƉƟŽŶƐƚŽĂŶĚ
ĚĞǀŝĂƟŽŶƐĨƌŽŵƚŚŝƐƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚŵĂLJďĞƉĞƌŵŝƩĞĚ
ďLJƚŚĞWůĂŶŶŝŶŐŝǀŝƐŝŽŶƚŽĂůůŽǁĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƟŽŶĂƚ
ƚŚĞƉĞƌŵŝƐƐŝďůĞĚĞŶƐŝƟĞƐƉƌĞƐĐƌŝďĞĚďLJƚŚĞŝƚLJ͛Ɛ
General Plan.

3.3.1.2 Windows Adjacent to Residences
tŝŶĚŽǁƐŝŶŶĞǁĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚĨĂĐŝŶŐĞdžŝƐƟŶŐƐŝŶŐůĞͲ
ĨĂŵŝůLJŽƌĚƵƉůĞdžďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐǁŝƚŚŝŶϭϱĨĞĞƚŽĨƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJ
ůŝŶĞƐƐŚĂůůďĞĚĞƐŝŐŶĞĚƵƐŝŶŐĂƚůĞĂƐƚŽŶĞŽĨƚŚĞ
ĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ͗
,ĞŝŐŚƚdƌĂŶƐŝƟŽŶƐ

SINGLE-FAMILY AND MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS 35 City of Daly City 3. Objective Design Standards for Multi-Family Residential Developments » WƌŽǀŝĚĞƚƌĂŶƐůƵĐĞŶƚŽƌŽďƐĐƵƌĞǁŝŶĚŽǁŐůĂƐƐ͘
» ĞƐŝŐŶŽīƐĞƚǁŝŶĚŽǁƉĂƩĞƌŶƐĨŽƌǁŝŶĚŽǁƐŽŶƚŚĞ
ƐĂŵĞůĞǀĞůĂƐƚŚĞĞdžŝƐƟŶŐǁŝŶĚŽǁƐ͘
» >ŽĐĂƚĞǁŝŶĚŽǁƐŝůůƐĮǀĞĨĞĞƚĂďŽǀĞƚŚĞŇŽŽƌůĞǀĞů
;ƐƵďũĞĐƚƚŽƵŝůĚŝŶŐŽĚĞƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐͿ͘
» ^ĐƌĞĞŶǁŝƚŚĚĞŶƐĞůĂŶĚƐĐĂƉŝŶŐďĞƚǁĞĞŶƚŚĞŶĞǁ
ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚĂŶĚĞdžŝƐƟŶŐƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂůƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJ͕ƵƐŝŶŐ
ĞǀĞƌŐƌĞĞŶƚƌĞĞŽƌŚĞĚŐĞŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐĞdžƉĞĐƚĞĚƚŽŐƌŽǁ
ƚŽĂŚĞŝŐŚƚŽĨϭϱĨĞĞƚŽƌŵŽƌĞ͘

3.3.1.3 Parking Lots Adjacent to
Residences
» WĂƌŬŝŶŐ>Žƚ&ĞŶĐŝŶŐ͘&ŽƌĂďƵƫŶŐůŽƚƐƚŚĂƚĂƌĞ
njŽŶĞĚZͲϭ;^ŝŶŐůĞͲĨĂŵŝůLJZĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂůŝƐƚƌŝĐƚͿŽƌ
ZͲϭͬ;^ŝŶŐůĞͲĨĂŵŝůLJͬƵƉůĞdžZĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂůŝƐƚƌŝĐƚͿ͕Ăůů
ƐƵƌĨĂĐĞƉĂƌŬŝŶŐůŽƚƐĂƚƚŚĞŐƌŽƵŶĚŇŽŽƌƐŚĂůůƉƌŽǀŝĚĞ
ĂŵŝŶŝŵƵŵƐŝdžͲĨŽŽƚͲŚŝŐŚĨĞŶĐĞŽƌǁĂůůďĞƚǁĞĞŶ
ƚŚĞƉĂƌŬŝŶŐůŽƚĂŶĚƚŚĞƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJůŝŶĞ͘&ĞŶĐĞƐŽƌ
ǁĂůůƐƐŚĂůůŚĂǀĞĂƉůĂŶƚĞĚĞĚŐĞŽĨĂƚůĞĂƐƚĨŽƵƌĨĞĞƚ
ďĞƚǁĞĞŶƚŚĞƉĂƌŬŝŶŐůŽƚĂŶĚƚŚĞĨĂĐĞŽĨƚŚĞĨĞŶĐĞŽƌ
wall.

3.4 Landscaping and Lighting

3.4.1  Planting and Hardscape
Intent

ŶƐƵƌĞƚŚĂƚƚŚĞůĂŶĚƐĐĂƉĞĚĞƐŝŐŶŽĨŽƉĞŶ
ƐƉĂĐĞĂƌĞĂƐĂŶĚůĂŶĚƐĐĂƉĞĚĂƌĞĂƐŝŶŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ
ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐƉƌŽǀŝĚĞǁĞůůͲŵĂŝŶƚĂŝŶĞĚ
ůĂŶĚƐĐĂƉĞƚŚĂƚĞŶŚĂŶĐĞƐŶĞǁĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͘

3.4.1.1 Planting Pattern and Design
Concepts
» ŽŵŵŽŶŽƉĞŶƐƉĂĐĞĂƌĞĂƐƐŚĂůůŝŶĐůƵĚĞĂŵŝŶŝŵƵŵ
ŽĨŽŶĞƚƌĞĞƉĞƌϯϬϬƐƋƵĂƌĞĨĞĞƚŽĨůĂŶĚƐĐĂƉŝŶŐ͘
» ůůůĂŶĚƐĐĂƉĞĚĂƌĞĂƐƐŚĂůůŝŶĐůƵĚĞĂƚůĞĂƐƚƚǁŽŽĨƚŚĞ ĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐƉůĂŶƟŶŐĚĞƐŝŐŶĐŽŶĐĞƉƚƐ͗
• ^ƉĞĐŝŵĞŶƚƌĞĞƐ;ϰϴͲŝŶĐŚďŽdžŽƌŵŽƌĞͿŝŶŝŶĨŽƌŵĂů
ŐƌŽƵƉŝŶŐƐŽƌƌŽǁƐĂƚŵĂũŽƌĨŽĐĂůƉŽŝŶƚƐ͘
• hƐĞŽĨƉůĂŶƟŶŐƚŽĐƌĞĂƚĞƐŚĂĚŽǁĂŶĚƉĂƩĞƌŶƐ
ĂŐĂŝŶƐƚǁĂůůƐ͘
• hƐĞŽĨƉůĂŶƟŶŐƚŽƐŽŌĞŶďƵŝůĚŝŶŐůŝŶĞƐĂŶĚ
ĞŵƉŚĂƐŝnjĞƚŚĞƉŽƐŝƟǀĞĨĞĂƚƵƌĞƐŽĨƚŚĞƐŝƚĞ͘
• hƐĞŽĨŇŽǁĞƌŝŶŐǀŝŶĞƐŽŶǁĂůůƐ͕ĂƌďŽƌƐ͕Žƌ
ƚƌĞůůŝƐĞƐ͘
• dƌĞĞƐƚŽĐƌĞĂƚĞĐĂŶŽƉLJĂŶĚƐŚĂĚĞ͘
» ůůƐŝĚĞůŽƚƐďĞƚǁĞĞŶďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐŽĨƐŝdžĨĞĞƚŽƌŵŽƌĞ
ƐŚĂůůďĞůĂŶĚƐĐĂƉĞĚǁŝƚŚƚƌĞĞƐŽƌƐŚƌƵďƐ͘
» ƚůĞĂƐƚϲϱƉĞƌĐĞŶƚŽĨƚŽƚĂůŚĂƌĚƐĐĂƉŝŶŐŝŶĐŽŵŵŽŶ
ŽƉĞŶƐƉĂĐĞƐƐŚĂůůĐŽŶƐŝƐƚŽĨĚĞĐŽƌĂƟǀĞƉĂǀĞƌƐ͕
ŵĂƐŽŶƌLJ͕ĐŽůŽƌĞĚĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞ͕ĚĞĐŽƌĂƟǀĞŝŶůĂLJ͕Žƌ
ƐƚĂŵƉĞĚŽƌŽƚŚĞƌǁŝƐĞƚĞdžƚƵƌĞĚĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞ͘
» ůůůĂŶĚƐĐĂƉŝŶŐƐŚĂůůďĞŝƌƌŝŐĂƚĞĚŝŶĂĐĐŽƌĚĂŶĐĞǁŝƚŚ ŚĂƉƚĞƌϭϳ͘ϰϭͲtĂƚĞƌŽŶƐĞƌǀĂƟŽŶŝŶ>ĂŶĚƐĐĂƉŝŶŐ͘
» ůůůĂŶĚƐĐĂƉŝŶŐƐŚĂůůďĞƉƌŽĨĞƐƐŝŽŶĂůůLJŵĂŶĂŐĞĚ
ĨŽƌƚŚĞůŝĨĞŽĨƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚĂŶĚĞǀŝĚĞŶĐĞŽĨƐƵĐŚ
ŵĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚƐŚĂůůďĞƐƵƉƉůŝĞĚĂƚƚŚĞƟŵĞŽĨ
ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƉĞƌŵŝƚŝƐƐƵĂŶĐĞ͘

3.4.1.2 Street Trees
WƌŽǀŝĚĞƐƚƌĞĞƚƚƌĞĞƐǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞƉƵďůŝĐƌŝŐŚƚͲŽĨͲǁĂLJŝŶĂ ůŝŶĞĂƌƌŽǁƉĂƩĞƌŶĂƚĂŶŝŶƚĞƌǀĂůďĞƚǁĞĞŶϮϬƚŽϰϬĨĞĞƚ ŽŶĂůůƐƚƌĞĞƚĨĂĕĂĚĞƐ͕ǁŚĞƌĞƚŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚƐƚƌĞĞƚƚƌĞĞ
ůŽĐĂƟŽŶĚŽĞƐŶŽƚŝŵƉĂĐƚĂŶLJĞdžŝƐƟŶŐƵƟůŝƟĞƐ͘^ƚƌĞĞƚ
ƚƌĞĞƐƐŚĂůůƌĞĐĞŝǀĞŵĞƚĂůƚƌĞĞŐƌĂƚĞƐǁŝƚŚƌĞŵŽǀĂďůĞ
ĐĞŶƚĞƌƌŝŶŐƐŝŶĂĚĞƐŝŐŶĂĐĐĞƉƚĂďůĞƚŽƚŚĞWůĂŶŶŝŶŐ
ŝǀŝƐŝŽŶĂŶĚƐŚĂůůďĞŝŶƐƚĂůůĞĚƚŽŝƚLJƐƉĞĐŝĮĐĂƟŽŶĂƐƚŽ ƌŽŽƚďĂůůĞdžĐĂǀĂƟŽŶĂŶĚĚĞƉƚŚ͘

3.4.1.3 Root Barrier Requirement
» ZŽŽƚďĂƌƌŝĞƌƐƐŚĂůůďĞƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚĨŽƌĂůůƚƌĞĞƐůŽĐĂƚĞĚ ĮǀĞĨĞĞƚŽƌĐůŽƐĞƌƚŽĂŶLJŚĂƌĚƐĐĂƉĞĞůĞŵĞŶƚŽƌ
ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ͘

3.4.1.4 Clearance from Utilities
WůĂŶƚŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐƐŚĂůůďĞƉůĂĐĞĚƐŽƚŚĞLJĚŽŶŽƚƌĞƐƚƌŝĐƚ ĂĐĐĞƐƐƚŽĞŵĞƌŐĞŶĐLJĂƉƉĂƌĂƚƵƐƐƵĐŚĂƐĮƌĞŚLJĚƌĂŶƚƐ
ŽƌĨŽƌĞĂůĂƌŵďŽdžĞƐŽƌĚŝƐƚƵƌďŽǀĞƌŚĞĂĚůŝŶĞƐŽƌ
ƵŶĚĞƌŐƌŽƵŶĚƵƟůŝƟĞƐ͘dƌĞĞƐĂŶĚůĂƌŐĞƐŚƌƵďƐƐŚĂůůďĞ
ƉůĂĐĞĚĂƐĨŽůůŽǁƐ͗

36 SINGLE-FAMILY AND MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS City of Daly City 3. Objective Design Standards for Multi-Family Residential Developments » ŵŝŶŝŵƵŵŽĨƐŝdžĨĞĞƚďĞƚǁĞĞŶƚŚĞĐĞŶƚĞƌŽĨƚƌĞĞƐ
ĂŶĚƚŚĞĞĚŐĞŽĨĂĚƌŝǀĞǁĂLJ͕ĂǁĂƚĞƌŵĞƚĞƌ͕ŐĂƐ
ŵĞƚĞƌ͕ĂŶĚƐĞǁĞƌůĂƚĞƌĂůƐ͘
» ŵŝŶŝŵƵŵŽĨϮϬĨĞĞƚďĞƚǁĞĞŶƚŚĞĐĞŶƚĞƌŽĨƚƌĞĞƐ
ĂŶĚƚŚĞďĞŐŝŶŶŝŶŐŽĨĐƵƌďƌĞƚƵƌŶƐĂƚŝŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƟŽŶƐ
ƚŽŬĞĞƉƚƌĞĞƐŽƵƚŽĨƚŚĞůŝŶĞͲŽĨͲƐŝŐŚƚƚƌŝĂŶŐůĞĂƚ
ŝŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƟŽŶƐ͘
» ŵŝŶŝŵƵŵŽĨϭϱĨĞĞƚďĞƚǁĞĞŶƚŚĞĐĞŶƚĞƌŽĨƚƌĞĞƐ
ĂŶĚůĂƌŐĞƐŚƌƵďƐƚŽƵƟůŝƚLJƉŽůĞƐĂŶĚƐƚƌĞĞƚůŝŐŚƚƐ͘
» ŵŝŶŝŵƵŵŽĨĞŝŐŚƚĨĞĞƚďĞƚǁĞĞŶƚŚĞĐĞŶƚĞƌŽĨƚƌĞĞƐ
ŽƌůĂƌŐĞƐŚƌƵďƐĂŶĚĮƌĞŚLJĚƌĂŶƚƐĂŶĚĮƌĞĚĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚ
ƐƉƌŝŶŬůĞƌĂŶĚƐƚĂŶĚƉŝƉĞĐŽŶŶĞĐƟŽŶƐ͘

3.4.1.5 Parking Lot Planting
» WĂƌŬŝŶŐ>ŽƚdƌĞĞ^ƉĂĐŝŶŐ͘&ŽƌƐƵƌĨĂĐĞƉĂƌŬŝŶŐůŽƚƐ͕
ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĂƚůĞĂƐƚŽŶĞƚƌĞĞƉĞƌϰϬϬƐƋƵĂƌĞĨĞĞƚŽĨ
ƚŽƚĂůƉĂƌŬŝŶŐůŽƚĂƌĞĂ͘dƌĞĞƐƐŚĂůůďĞϭϱͲŐĂůůŽŶƐŝnjĞ
ŵŝŶŝŵƵŵ͘
» ^ƵƌĨĂĐĞWĂƌŬŝŶŐ>ŽƚWĞƌŝŵĞƚĞƌ ͘dŚĞƉĞƌŝŵĞƚĞƌŽĨĂŶLJ ƐƵƌĨĂĐĞƉĂƌŬŝŶŐůŽƚƐŚĂůůƚĞƌŵŝŶĂƚĞĂŵŝŶŝŵƵŵŽĨĮǀĞ
ĨĞĞƚĨƌŽŵƚŚĞĨĂĐĞŽĨĂďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ͘dŚŝƐĂƌĞĂƐŚĂůůďĞ
ƉůĂŶƚĞĚǁŝƚŚƐŚƌƵďƐ͕ƵŶůĞƐƐŝƚ͛ƐƵƐĞĚĂƐĂƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶ
ǁĂůŬǁĂLJ͘

3.4.1.6 Parking Structure Landscaping
»
ĚŐĞƐŽĨŐĂƌĂŐĞƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞƐǀŝƐŝďůĞĂďŽǀĞŐƌĂĚĞƐŚĂůů
ďĞƐĐƌĞĞŶĞĚǁŝƚŚĞǀĞƌŐƌĞĞŶƉůĂŶƚŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐƚŽďƵīĞƌ
ǀŝĞǁƐŽĨƚŚĞƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĂŶĚďůŽĐŬǀŝĞǁƐŽĨŐĂƌĂŐĞ
ůŝŐŚƟŶŐĨƌŽŵƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐĂŶĚƉƵďůŝĐǀŝĞǁ͘

3.4.1.7 Sustainable Landscaping
» /ŶǀĂƐŝǀĞ^ƉĞĐŝĞƐZĞƐƚƌŝĐƟŽŶ͘ůůƉůĂŶƚŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐƐŚĂůů ďĞŶĂƟǀĞĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂŽƌŶŽŶŝŶǀĂƐŝǀĞ͕ĚƌŽƵŐŚƚͲƚŽůĞƌĂŶƚ
ƐƉĞĐŝĞƐĂĚĂƉƚĂďůĞƚŽƚŚĞĂůLJŝƚLJĐůŝŵĂƚĞ͘ůůƐƉĞĐŝĞƐ ŝĚĞŶƟĮĞĚŝŶƚŚĞĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ/ŶǀĂƐŝǀĞWůĂŶƚŽƵŶĐŝů͛Ɛ
;ĂůͲ/WͿ/ŶǀĞŶƚŽƌLJŽĨ/ŶǀĂƐŝǀĞWůĂŶƚƐĂƌĞƉƌŽŚŝďŝƚĞĚ͘
» ZĞĐLJĐůĞĚ/ƌƌŝŐĂƟŽŶZĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚ͘>ĂŶĚƐĐĂƉĞ
ŝƌƌŝŐĂƟŽŶƐLJƐƚĞŵƐƐŚĂůůƵƟůŝnjĞƌĞĐLJĐůĞĚǁĂƚĞƌ
ƐLJƐƚĞŵƐ͕ŝĨĂǀĂŝůĂďůĞ͘/ĨƌĞĐLJĐůĞĚǁĂƚĞƌŝƐĂǀĂŝůĂďůĞ͕ ƐĂůƚͲƚŽůĞƌĂŶƚƉůĂŶƚŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐƐŚĂůůďĞƐĞůĞĐƚĞĚ͘
» >ŽǁͲDĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞWůĂŶƟŶŐĞƐŝŐŶ͘WůĂŶƚƐƐŚĂůůďĞ
ƐĞůĞĐƚĞĚĂŶĚůĂŶĚƐĐĂƉĞƐĚĞƐŝŐŶĞĚƚŽĞŶƐƵƌĞƚŚĂƚ
ƉůĂŶƚƐǁŝůůŐƌŽǁƚŽŵĂƚƵƌŝƚLJǁŝƚŚŽƵƚƌĞŐƵůĂƌĐůŝƉƉŝŶŐ
ŽƌƉƌƵŶŝŶŐĂƚƉĂƚŚǁĂLJƐ͕ĐƵƌďƐ͕ŽƌďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐ͘

3.4.2  Lighting
Intent
>ŝŐŚƟŶŐƐŚŽƵůĚĚŽũƵƐƚĞŶŽƵŐŚƚŽůŝŐŚƚĂŶĂƌĞĂ
ƐĂĨĞůLJĂŶĚĂƩƌĂĐƟǀĞůLJ͕ǁŝƚŚŽƵƚĐĂƵƐŝŶŐŐůĂƌĞŽƌ
ƐƉŝůůŽǀĞƌŽŶƚŽŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŝŶŐƉƌŽƉĞƌƟĞƐ͘

3.4.2.1 Street Frontage Lighting
ůůŶĞǁďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐƐŚĂůůƌĞĐĞŝǀĞƵƉͲůŝŐŚƟŶŐĂŶĚǁĂůůͲ
ǁĂƐŚůŝŐŚƟŶŐĂƚƚŚĞƐƚƌĞĞƚĨƌŽŶƚĂŐĞƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĂŶ
ĂƩƌĂĐƟǀĞĂƉƉĞĂƌĂŶĐĞĂƚŶŝŐŚƚ͘

3.4.2.2 Pedestrian Lighting
ůůĂƌĞĂƐƵƐĞĚďLJƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐĂŶĚĐLJĐůŝƐƚƐƐŚĂůůďĞ
ŝůůƵŵŝŶĂƚĞĚĂƚŶŝŐŚƚ͘^ƵĐŚĂƌĞĂƐŝŶĐůƵĚĞ͗
» WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƉĂƚŚǁĂLJƐ
» ŝĐLJĐůĞĨĂĐŝůŝƟĞƐ
» DƵůƟͲŵŽĚĂůƉĂƚŚǁĂLJƐ
» Open spaces

3.4.2.3 Street Lighting
^ƚƌĞĞƚůŝŐŚƟŶŐƐŚĂůůďĞŝŶƐƚĂůůĞĚŝŶƐŝĚĞƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚĂůŽŶŐ ƚŚĞŶĞƚǁŽƌŬŽĨŝŶƚĞƌŶĂůƐƚƌĞĞƚƐ͘
ůůƉŽůĞͲŵŽƵŶƚĞĚƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĂŶĚƐƚƌĞĞƚůŝŐŚƟŶŐƐŚĂůůďĞ ƐŚŝĞůĚĞĚƚŽŵŝŶŝŵŝnjĞŐůĂƌĞĂŶĚƉƌĞǀĞŶƚƐƉŝůůŽǀĞƌŽŶƚŽ ĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚƉƌŽƉĞƌƟĞƐ͘^ŚŝĞůĚĞĚƐƚƌĞĞƚůŝŐŚƟŶŐŽŶƉŽůĞƐ
ϭϬƚŽϮϬĨĞĞƚŚŝŐŚƐŚĂůůďĞƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚŽŶĂƚůĞĂƐƚŽŶĞƐŝĚĞ ŽĨƚŚĞƉƌŝǀĂƚĞƐƚƌĞĞƚ͕ĞdžƚĞŶĚŝŶŐĨƌŽŵƚŚĞŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚ ƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJůŝŶĞƚŽƚŚĞĮƌƐƚŝŶƚĞƌŝŽƌŝŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƟŽŶ͘

3.4.2.4 Inappropriate Lighting
EŽůŝŐŚƚƐƚŚĂƚďůŝŶŬ͕ƌĞǀŽůǀĞ͕ŇĂƐŚ͕ŽƌĐŚĂŶŐĞŝŶƚĞŶƐŝƚLJ ƐŚĂůůďĞƉĞƌŵŝƩĞĚŝŶƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂůŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚƐ͘

SINGLE-FAMILY AND MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS 37 City of Daly City 4. Definitions

4.  Definitions
» ƌƚĞƌŝĂů^ƚƌĞĞƚ͗ŶLJƐƚƌĞĞƚŽƌƌŽĂĚƉĂƐƐŝŶŐĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚ ƚŽŽƌƚŚƌŽƵŐŚĂƐƵďĚŝǀŝƐŝŽŶƚŚĂƚĐĂƌƌŝĞƐƚŚĞŵĂũŽƌ
ŇŽǁŽĨƚƌĂĸĐĂŶĚĨŽƌǁŚŝĐŚƚŚĞƚƌĂĸĐĞŶƚĞƌŝŶŐĨƌŽŵ
ƐŝĚĞƌŽĂĚƐĂŶĚƐƚƌĞĞƚƐŵĂLJďĞĐŽŶƚƌŽůůĞĚ͘
»
ŽƩĂŐĞŽƵƌƚ͗ŐƌŽƵƉŽĨƐŵĂůů͕ĚĞƚĂĐŚĞĚŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ
ƵŶŝƚƐĂƌƌĂŶŐĞĚĂƌŽƵŶĚĂƐŚĂƌĞĚĐŽƵƌƚǀŝƐŝďůĞĨƌŽŵ
ƚŚĞƐƚƌĞĞƚ͘
»
Courtyard:KƵƚĚŽŽƌĂƌĞĂƚŚĂƚŝƐƉƌŝŵĂƌŝůLJŽƉĞŶƚŽ
ƚŚĞƐŬLJĂŶĚƐƵƌƌŽƵŶĚĞĚďLJďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐ͕ǁĂůůƐ͕ŽƌĂ
ĐŽŵďŝŶĂƟŽŶŽĨƚŚĞƚǁŽ͘
»
ŽƌŵĞƌ͗ƌŽŽĨĞĚƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ͕ŽŌĞŶĐŽŶƚĂŝŶŝŶŐĂ
ǁŝŶĚŽǁ͕ƚŚĂƚƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐǀĞƌƟĐĂůůLJďĞLJŽŶĚƚŚĞƉůĂŶĞŽĨ
ĂƉƌŝŵĂƌLJƉŝƚĐŚĞĚƌŽŽŇŝŶĞ͘
»
ƵƉůĞdž͕ƐƚĂĐŬĞĚ͗ĚĞƚĂĐŚĞĚƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞƚŚĂƚĐŽŶƐŝƐƚƐ
ŽĨƚǁŽĚǁĞůůŝŶŐƵŶŝƚƐĂƌƌĂŶŐĞĚŽŶĞĂďŽǀĞƚŚĞŽƚŚĞƌ͕
ĞĂĐŚǁŝƚŚĂŶĞŶƚƌLJĨƌŽŵƚŚĞƐƚƌĞĞƚ͘
»
ƵƉůĞdž͕ƐŝĚĞͲďLJͲƐŝĚĞ͗ĚĞƚĂĐŚĞĚƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞƚŚĂƚ
ĐŽŶƐŝƐƚƐŽĨƚǁŽĚǁĞůůŝŶŐƵŶŝƚƐĂƌƌĂŶŐĞĚƐŝĚĞͲďLJͲƐŝĚĞ͕
ĞĂĐŚǁŝƚŚĂŶĞŶƚƌLJĨƌŽŵƚŚĞƐƚƌĞĞƚ͘
»

ĂǀĞ͗dŚĞĞĚŐĞŽĨĂƌŽŽĨ͕ǁŚŝĐŚƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐďĞLJŽŶĚƚŚĞ
ǁĂůůƉůĂŶĞ͕ĨŽƌŵŝŶŐĂŶŽǀĞƌŚĂŶŐ͘
»
ůĞǀĂƟŽŶ͗dŚĞĞdžƚĞƌŝŽƌǁĂůůŽƌĨĂĐĞŽĨĂďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ
ĞdžƚĞŶĚŝŶŐǀĞƌƟĐĂůůLJĨƌŽŵƚŚĞŐƌĂĚĞƚŽƚŚĞƚŽƉŽĨĂ
ƉĂƌĂƉĞƚǁĂůůŽƌĞĂǀĞ͕ĂŶĚŚŽƌŝnjŽŶƚĂůůLJĂĐƌŽƐƐƚŚĞ
ĞŶƟƌĞǁŝĚƚŚŽĨƚŚĞďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ͘
»
&ƌŽŶƚĂŐĞ͗dŚĞǁŝĚƚŚŽĨĂůŽƚŽƌďůŽĐŬŵĞĂƐƵƌĞĚ
ĂůŽŶŐƚŚĞƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJůŝŶĞĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚƚŽƚŚĞƐƚƌĞĞƚ͘
» Gable:ƌŽŽĨƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĐŽŶƐŝƐƟŶŐŽĨƚǁŽƐĞĐƟŽŶƐ
ǁŚŽƐĞƵƉƉĞƌŚŽƌŝnjŽŶƚĂůĞĚŐĞƐŵĞĞƚƚŽĨŽƌŵŝƚƐ
ƌŝĚŐĞ͘
»
DĂŶƐĂƌĚ͗ƌŽŽĨƚLJƉĞŚĂǀŝŶŐƚǁŽƐůŽƉĞƐŽŶĞǀĞƌLJ
ƐŝĚĞ͕ƚŚĞůŽǁĞƌƐůŽƉĞďĞŝŶŐƐƚĞĞƉĞƌƚŚĂŶƚŚĞƵƉƉĞƌ ͘
» Parapet:ůŽǁƉƌŽƚĞĐƟǀĞǁĂůůĂůŽŶŐƚŚĞĞĚŐĞŽĨ
ĂƌŽŽĨ͕ďƌŝĚŐĞ͕ŽƌďĂůĐŽŶLJŽĨĚŝǀĞƌƐĞĚĞƐŝŐŶĂŶĚ
ŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐ͘
»
Porch:ĐŽǀĞƌĞĚ͕ƐŽŵĞƟŵĞƐƉĂƌƚůLJĐůŽƐĞĚĂƌĞĂĂƚ
ƚŚĞĞŶƚƌĂŶĐĞƚŽĂďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ͕ƵƐƵĂůůLJƉƌŽũĞĐƟŶŐĨƌŽŵ
ƚŚĞǁĂůůŚĂǀŝŶŐĂƐĞƉĂƌĂƚĞƌŽŽĨ͘
»
WƌŝŵĂƌLJ^ƚƌĞĞƚ͗^ƚƌĞĞƚǁŚĞƌĞƚŚĞŚŝŐŚĞƐƚůĞǀĞůŽĨ
ǀĞŚŝĐůĞ͕ƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶ͕ĂŶĚͬŽƌďŝĐLJĐůĞĐŝƌĐƵůĂƟŽŶŝƐ
ĂŶƟĐŝƉĂƚĞĚĨŽƌĂĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƉƌŽũĞĐƚ͘
»
^ĞƚďĂĐŬ͗dŚĞƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞĨƌŽŵƚŚĞŶĞĂƌĞƐƚ
ĞůĞǀĂƟŽŶŽĨĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞƚŽƚŚĞƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJůŝŶĞŽŶǁŚŝĐŚ
ŝƚŝƐůŽĐĂƚĞĚ͘
»
^ƚĞƉďĂĐŬ͗ĐŚĂŶŐĞŝŶƚŚĞǀĞƌƟĐĂůƉůĂŶĞŽĨĂ
ŵƵůƟƐƚŽƌLJďƵŝůĚŝŶŐĐƌĞĂƚĞĚďLJƐĞƫŶŐƚŚĞƵƉƉĞƌͲ
ƐƚŽƌLJďƵŝůĚŝŶŐĞůĞǀĂƟŽŶĂǁĂLJĨƌŽŵƚŚĞƐƚŽƌLJ;ŝĞƐͿ
below.
»
Townhouse:ƐŝŶŐůĞƵŶŝƚŽƌƐĞƌŝĞƐŽĨĂƩĂĐŚĞĚƵŶŝƚƐ
ƐŝĚĞͲďLJͲƐŝĚĞƚŚĂƚŐĞŶĞƌĂůůLJŚĂǀĞĨƌŽŶƚĚŽŽƌƐŽŶŽŶĞ
ƐŝĚĞĂŶĚŐĂƌĂŐĞƐŽŶƚŚĞďĂĐŬƐŝĚĞ͘DŽƐƚƚŽǁŶŚŽƵƐĞƐ
ŚĂǀĞƚǁŽͲĐĂƌŐĂƌĂŐĞƐ͕ĞŝƚŚĞƌƚǁŽƐƉĂĐĞƐǁŝĚĞŽƌƚǁŽ
ƚĂŶĚĞŵƐƉĂĐĞƐ;ĞŶĚƚŽĞŶĚͿ͘
»
Walkway:ƉĂƐƐĂŐĞǁĂLJĚĞƐŝŐŶĞĚĨŽƌƵƐĞďLJ
ƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐĂŶĚŶŽƚŝŶƚĞŶĚĞĚĨŽƌƵƐĞĂƐĂǁĂLJĨŽƌ
ŵŽƚŽƌͲĚƌŝǀĞŶǀĞŚŝĐůĞƐ͘

38 SINGLE-FAMILY AND MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS City of Daly City Appendix List
Appendix

39 City of Daly City
Checklist for Single-Family Developments
EĂŵĞŽĨƉƉůŝĐĂŶƚ͗
ĂƚĞ͗
WƌŽũĞĐƚĚĚƌĞƐƐ͗
WƌŽũĞĐƚƉƉůŝĐĂƟŽŶEƵŵďĞƌ;ŝƚLJƐƚĂīƚŽĮůůŽƵƚͿ͗

džŝƐƟŶŐŽŶĞ͗
WƌŽũĞĐƚŝƐůŽĐĂƚĞĚĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚƚŽůŽƚƐnjŽŶĞĚZͲϯ;DƵůƟƉůĞͲ&ĂŵŝůLJZĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂůŝƐƚƌŝĐƚͿŽƌ ZͲϰ;DƵůƟƉůĞͲ&ĂŵŝůLJZĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂůĂŶĚWƌŽĨĞƐƐŝŽŶĂůŝƐƚƌŝĐƚͿ ;zĞƐͬEŽͿ
ĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚdLJƉĞ;ĐŚĞĐŬĂůůƚŚĂƚĂƉƉůLJͿ͗
^ŝŶŐůĞͲ&ĂŵŝůLJ ƵƉůĞdž
^ŝŶŐůĞͲ&ĂŵŝůLJͬƵƉůĞdž
KďũĞĐƟǀĞĞƐŝŐŶ^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐŚĞĐŬůŝƐƚ/ƚĞŵƐ
ƉƉůŝĐĂŶƚ

ǀĂůƵĂƟŽŶ ^ƚĂī
ǀĂůƵĂƟŽŶLJ͗
Yes No N/A Yes No N/A
ǀĂůƵĂƟŽŶĂŶĚ
ƌĂǁŝŶŐZĞĨĞƌĞŶĐĞ
Ϯ͘ϭ^ŝƚĞĞƐŝŐŶ
Ϯ͘ϭ͘ϭƵŝůĚŝŶŐKƌŝĞŶƚĂƟŽŶĂŶĚ^ƚƌĞĞƚ
ĚŐĞ
Ϯ͘ϭ͘ϭ͘ϭ KƌŝĞŶƚĂƟŽŶƚŽ^ƚƌĞĞƚ
Ϯ͘ϭ͘ϭ͘Ϯ ĐĐĞƐƐƚŽDĂŝŶ
ŶƚƌLJ
Ϯ͘ϭ͘ϮWĂƌŬŝŶŐĂŶĚ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞ
Ϯ͘ϭ͘Ϯ͘ϭ ƌŝǀĞǁĂLJ>ĞŶŐƚŚ
Ϯ͘ϭ͘Ϯ͘Ϯ ƌŝǀĞǁĂLJWĂǀŝŶŐDĂƚĞƌŝĂů
Ϯ͘ϭ͘Ϯ͘ϯ ƵƌďƵƚͬƌŝǀĞǁĂLJtŝĚƚŚ
Ϯ͘ϭ͘Ϯ͘ϰ hƟůŝƚLJ^ĐƌĞĞŶŝŶŐ
Ϯ͘ϭ͘Ϯ͘ϱ dƌĂƐŚ^ƚŽƌĂŐĞ^ŝƟŶŐĂŶĚ^ĐƌĞĞŶŝŶŐ
Ϯ͘ϮƵŝůĚŝŶŐĞƐŝŐŶ
Ϯ͘Ϯ͘ϭƵŝůĚŝŶŐ&ƌŽŶƚĂŐĞ
Ϯ͘Ϯ͘ϭ͘ϭ DĂŝŶ
ŶƚƌLJǁĂLJZĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚ
Ϯ͘Ϯ͘ϮDĂƐƐŝŶŐĂŶĚƌƟĐƵůĂƟŽŶ
Ϯ͘Ϯ͘Ϯ͘ϭ &ƌŽŶƚ
ůĞǀĂƟŽŶDĂƐƐŝŶŐ

40 City of Daly City
^ŝŶŐůĞͲ&ĂŵŝůLJͬƵƉůĞdž
KďũĞĐƟǀĞĞƐŝŐŶ^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐŚĞĐŬůŝƐƚ/ƚĞŵƐ
ƉƉůŝĐĂŶƚ

ǀĂůƵĂƟŽŶ ^ƚĂī
ǀĂůƵĂƟŽŶLJ͗
Yes No N/A Yes No N/A
ǀĂůƵĂƟŽŶĂŶĚ
ƌĂǁŝŶŐZĞĨĞƌĞŶĐĞ

2.2.2.2 'ĂƌĂŐĞĞƐŝŐŶ
Ϯ͘Ϯ͘Ϯ͘ϯ 'ĂƌĂŐĞŽŽƌĞƐŝŐŶ
Ϯ͘Ϯ͘ϯtŝŶĚŽǁƐ
Ϯ͘Ϯ͘ϯ͘ϭ tŝŶĚŽǁWĞƌŝŵĞƚĞƌ
Ϯ͘Ϯ͘ϯ͘Ϯ tŝŶĚŽǁĞƚĂŝůĨŽƌ&ƌŽŶƚ&ĂĐĂĚĞƐ
Ϯ͘Ϯ͘ϯ͘ϯ tŝŶĚŽǁ&ƌĂŵĞDĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐ
Ϯ͘Ϯ͘ϰZŽŽĨĞƐŝŐŶ
Ϯ͘Ϯ͘ϰ͘ϭ ZŽŽĨ&Žƌŵ
Ϯ͘Ϯ͘ϰ͘Ϯ ZŽŽĨWŝƚĐŚ
Ϯ͘Ϯ͘ϰ͘ϯ &ůĂƚZŽŽĨƐ
Ϯ͘Ϯ͘ϰ͘ϰ ZĞƐƚƌŝĐƚĞĚZŽŽĨ&ŽƌŵƐ
Ϯ͘Ϯ͘ϱƵŝůĚŝŶŐDĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐ͕ĞƚĂŝůƐ͕ĂŶĚŽůŽƌ
Ϯ͘Ϯ͘ϱ͘ϭ ƉƉƌŽƉƌŝĂƚĞƵŝůĚŝŶŐDĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐ
Ϯ͘Ϯ͘ϱ͘Ϯ /ŶĂƉƉƌŽƉƌŝĂƚĞƵŝůĚŝŶŐDĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐ
Ϯ͘Ϯ͘ϱ͘ϯ 'ƵƩĞƌƐ͕ŽǁŶƐƉŽƵƚƐ͕ĂŶĚsĞŶƚƐ
Ϯ͘Ϯ͘ϱ͘ϰ WĂŝŶƚColor
Ϯ͘Ϯ͘ϲ^ƉĞĐŝĂů^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐĨŽƌƵƉůĞdžĞƐĂŶĚƩĂĐŚĞĚ^ŝŶŐůĞͲ&ĂŵŝůLJZĞƐŝĚĞŶĐĞƐ Ϯ͘Ϯ͘ϲ͘ϭ ^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐĨŽƌƵƉůĞdžZĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂůƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐ
Ϯ͘Ϯ͘ϲ͘Ϯ ƌƟĐƵůĂƟŽŶĨŽƌ>ŽƚƐǁŝƚŚĞƌŽ>Žƚ>ŝŶĞ
Ϯ͘ϯŽŶƚĞdžƚ^ĞŶƐŝƟǀŝƚLJ
Ϯ͘ϯ͘ϭĚũĂĐĞŶƚƚŽ
džŝƐƟŶŐZĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂůĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ
Ϯ͘ϯ͘ϭ͘ϭ ^ŝĚĞWƌŽƉĞƌƚLJ>ŝŶĞ^ĞƚďĂĐŬ

2.3.1.2 WindowsĚũĂĐĞŶƚƚŽZĞƐŝĚĞŶĐĞƐ
Ϯ͘ϯ͘Ϯ,ŝůůƐŝĚĞĞƐŝŐŶ^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ
Ϯ͘ϯ͘Ϯ͘ϭ ĞƐŝŐŶŽĨZĞĂƌ&ĂĐĂĚĞƐ

2.3.2.2 ĞƐŝŐŶŽĨ,ŝůůƐŝĚĞ^ƵƉƉŽƌƚ^ƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞƐ
Ϯ͘ϯ͘Ϯ͘ϯ ĞƐŝŐŶŽĨ,ŝůůƐŝĚĞZĞƚĂŝŶŝŶŐtĂůůƐĂŶĚ&ĞŶĐĞƐ
Ϯ͘ϯ͘ϯĂůLJŝƚLJWůĂŶŶŝŶŐƌĞĂŽŶƚĞdžƚ^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ
Ϯ͘ϯ͘ϯ͘ϭ tĞƐƚůĂŬĞĂŶĚ^ŬLJůŝŶĞ
Ϯ͘ϯ͘ϯ͘Ϯ ^ƚ.&ƌĂŶĐŝƐ
Ϯ͘ϯ͘ϯ͘ϯ ^ĞƌƌĂŵŽŶƚĞ

41 City of Daly City
^ŝŶŐůĞͲ&ĂŵŝůLJͬƵƉůĞdž
KďũĞĐƟǀĞĞƐŝŐŶ^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐŚĞĐŬůŝƐƚ/ƚĞŵƐ
ƉƉůŝĐĂŶƚ

ǀĂůƵĂƟŽŶ ^ƚĂī
ǀĂůƵĂƟŽŶLJ͗
Yes No N/A Yes No N/A
ǀĂůƵĂƟŽŶĂŶĚ
ƌĂǁŝŶŐZĞĨĞƌĞŶĐĞ

2.3.3.4 sŝƐƚĂ Grande
Ϯ͘ϯ͘ϯ͘ϱ ,ŝůůƐŝĚĞ
Ϯ͘ϯ͘ϯ͘ϲ ƌŽĐŬĞƌ
Ϯ͘ϯ͘ϯ͘ϳ ^ŽƵƚŚĞƌŶ,ŝůůƐ
Ϯ͘ϯ͘ϯ͘ϴ ĂLJƐŚŽƌĞ
Ϯ͘ϰ>ĂŶĚƐĐĂƉŝŶŐĂŶĚ>ŝŐŚƟŶŐ
Ϯ͘ϰ͘ϭ&ƌŽŶƚLJĂƌĚ>ĂŶĚƐĐĂƉŝŶŐ
Ϯ͘ϰ͘ϭ͘ϭ ZĞƋƵŝƌĞĚ>ĂŶĚƐĐĂƉĞŽǀĞƌĂŐĞ
Ϯ͘ϰ͘ϮWůĂŶƟŶŐ
Ϯ͘ϰ͘Ϯ͘ϭ WůĂŶƟŶŐ^ŝnjĞ

2.4.2.2 WůĂŶƟŶŐ>ŽĐĂƟŽŶ
Ϯ͘ϰ͘Ϯ͘ϯ ^ƚƌĞĞƚdƌĞĞƐ

2.4.2.4 ƵƚŽŵĂƟĐ/ƌƌŝŐĂƟŽŶŽŶƚƌŽůůĞƌƐ
Ϯ͘ϰ͘ϯ&ĞŶĐŝŶŐ
Ϯ͘ϰ͘ϯ͘ϭ &ĞŶĐŝŶŐZĞƋƵŝƌĞĚ

2.4.3.2 Open&ĞŶĐŝŶŐ
Ϯ͘ϰ͘ϯ͘ϯ &ĞŶĐĞ,ĞŝŐŚƚ

2.4.3.4 WƌŽŚŝďŝƚĞĚDĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐ
Ϯ͘ϰ͘ϰ
džƚĞƌŝŽƌ>ŝŐŚƟŶŐ
Ϯ͘ϰ͘ϰ͘ϭ >ŝŐŚƟŶŐ&ŝdžƚƵƌĞƐ

2.4.4.2 ŶƚƌLJǁĂLJ/ůůƵŵŝŶĂƟŽŶ
Ϯ͘ϰ͘ϰ͘ϯ 'ƌŽƵŶĚͲŵŽƵŶƚĞĚ>ŝŐŚƟŶŐ
Ϯ͘ϱKďũĞĐƟǀĞĞƐŝŐŶ^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐĨŽƌĐĐĞƐƐŽƌLJǁĞůůŝŶŐhŶŝƚƐ;hͿŝŶ^ŝŶŐůĞͲ&ĂŵŝůLJͬ ƵƉůĞdžŽŶŝŶŐŝƐƚƌŝĐƚƐ
Ϯ͘ϱ͘ϭdǁŽͲ^ƚŽƌLJhĞƐŝŐŶ

42 City of Daly City
Checklist For Multifamily Developments
EĂŵĞŽĨƉƉůŝĐĂŶƚ͗
ĂƚĞ͗
WƌŽũĞĐƚĚĚƌĞƐƐ͗
WƌŽũĞĐƚƉƉůŝĐĂƟŽŶEƵŵďĞƌ;ŝƚLJƐƚĂīƚŽĮůůŽƵƚͿ͗

džŝƐƟŶŐŽŶĞ͗
WƌŽũĞĐƚƐŝƚĞŝƐůŽĐĂƚĞĚĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚƚŽůŽƚƐnjŽŶĞĚZͲϭ
;^ŝŶŐůĞͲĨĂŵŝůLJZĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂůŝƐƚƌŝĐƚͿŽƌ
ZͲϭͬ;^ŝŶŐůĞͲĨĂŵŝůLJͬƵƉůĞdžZĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂůͿ;zĞƐͬEŽͿ
ĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚdLJƉĞ;ĐŚĞĐŬĂůůƚŚĂƚĂƉƉůLJͿ͗
DƵůƟĨĂŵŝůLJ
DƵůƟĨĂŵŝůLJZĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂů
KďũĞĐƟǀĞĞƐŝŐŶ^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐŚĞĐŬůŝƐƚ/ƚĞŵƐ
ƉƉůŝĐĂŶƚ

ǀĂůƵĂƟŽŶ ^ƚĂī
ǀĂůƵĂƟŽŶLJ͗
Yes No N/A Yes No N/A
ǀĂůƵĂƟŽŶĂŶĚ
ƌĂǁŝŶŐZĞĨĞƌĞŶĐĞ
ϯ͘ϭ^ŝƚĞĞƐŝŐŶ
ϯ͘ϭ͘ϭƵŝůĚŝŶŐͲ^ƚƌĞĞƚ
ĚŐĞ
ϯ͘ϭ͘ϭ͘ϭ ƵŝůĚŝŶŐKƌŝĞŶƚĂƟŽŶ
ϯ͘ϭ͘ϭ͘Ϯ DŝŶŝŵŝnjĞ&ƌŽŶƚĂŐĞ>ĞŶŐƚŚ
ϯ͘ϭ͘ϭ͘ϯ
ŶƚƌLJǁĂLJĐĐĞƐƐtĂůŬǁĂLJ
ϯ͘ϭ͘ϭ͘ϰ ŽƌŶĞƌƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐ
ϯ͘ϭ͘ϮKƉĞŶ^ƉĂĐĞ
ϯ͘ϭ͘Ϯ͘ϭ WƌŝǀĂƚĞŽŵŵŽŶKƉĞŶ^ƉĂĐĞͲ^ŝƟŶŐ
ϯ͘ϭ͘Ϯ͘Ϯ WƌŝǀĂƚĞŽŵŵŽŶKƉĞŶ^ƉĂĐĞͲhƐĂďŝůŝƚLJ
ϯ͘ϭ͘Ϯ͘ϯ DŝŶŝŵƵŵŝŵĞŶƐŝŽŶƐ
ϯ͘ϭ͘Ϯ͘ϰ sŝƐŝďŝůŝƚLJ
ϯ͘ϭ͘Ϯ͘ϱ ^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚWĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶtĂůŬǁĂLJƐ
ϯ͘ϭ͘Ϯ͘ϲ ^ĞĂƟŶŐ
ϯ͘ϭ͘Ϯ͘ϳ ŵĞŶŝƚLJ&ĞĂƚƵƌĞƐ
ϯ͘ϭ͘Ϯ͘ϴ WůĂLJƌĞĂƐ
ϯ͘ϭ͘Ϯ͘ϵ KƉĞŶŝƌ^ƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞƐ

43 City of Daly City
DƵůƟĨĂŵŝůLJZĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂů
KďũĞĐƟǀĞĞƐŝŐŶ^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐŚĞĐŬůŝƐƚ/ƚĞŵƐ
ƉƉůŝĐĂŶƚ

ǀĂůƵĂƟŽŶ ^ƚĂī
ǀĂůƵĂƟŽŶLJ͗
Yes No N/A Yes No N/A
ǀĂůƵĂƟŽŶĂŶĚ
ƌĂǁŝŶŐZĞĨĞƌĞŶĐĞ
ϯ͘ϭ͘ϯDƵůƟƉůĞͲƵŝůĚŝŶŐĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ
ϯ͘ϭ͘ϯ͘ϭ ŝƌĐƵůĂƟŽŶ
ϯ͘ϭ͘ϯ͘Ϯ ^ƚƌĞĞƚ
ŶƚƌLJ&ĞĂƚƵƌĞƐ
ϯ͘ϭ͘ϰWĂƌŬŝŶŐ
ϯ͘ϭ͘ϰ͘ϭ WĂƌŬŝŶŐƌĞĂƐ^ŝƟŶŐ
ϯ͘ϭ͘ϰ͘Ϯ WĂƌŬŝŶŐĐĐĞƐƐ
ϯ͘ϭ͘ϰ͘ϯ ƵƌďƵƚƐ
ϯ͘ϭ͘ϰ͘ϰ sĞŚŝĐƵůĂƌĐĐĞƐƐƚŽ^ƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĚWĂƌŬŝŶŐ
ϯ͘ϭ͘ϰ͘ϱ WĂƌŬŝŶŐ>Žƚ^ĐƌĞĞŶŝŶŐ
ϯ͘ϭ͘ϰ͘ϲ ^ƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĚWĂƌŬŝŶŐĞƐŝŐŶ
ϯ͘ϭ͘ϰ͘ϳ ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞƐͲZĞƐƚƌŝĐƚĞĚWĂƌŬŝŶŐ^ƉĂĐĞDŝŶŝŵƵŵ
ϯ͘ϭ͘ϰ͘ϴ ŝĐLJĐůĞWĂƌŬŝŶŐ
ϯ͘ϭ͘ϱdƌĂƐŚĂŶĚZĞĐLJĐůŝŶŐƌĞĂƐ
ϯ͘ϭ͘ϱ͘ϭ dƌĂƐŚ^ƚŽƌĂŐĞ^ŝƟŶŐ
ϯ͘ϭ͘ϱ͘Ϯ ĐĐĞƐƐƚŽdƌĂƐŚŽůůĞĐƟŽŶ&ĂĐŝůŝƟĞƐ
ϯ͘ϭ͘ϱ͘ϯ ZĞǀŝĞǁďLJdƌĂƐŚͬZĞĐLJĐůŝŶŐ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞWƌŽǀŝĚĞƌ
ϯ͘ϭ͘ϲůƵƐƚĞƌDĂŝůďŽdžĞƐŝŐŶ
ϯ͘ϭ͘ϲ͘ϭ WĂǀŝŶŐdLJƉĞ
ϯ͘ϭ͘ϲ͘Ϯ ^ŝĚĞǁĂůŬƐĂŶĚWĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶWĂƚŚǁĂLJƐ
ϯ͘ϭ͘ϲ͘ϯ >ĂŶĚƐĐĂƉŝŶŐ
ϯ͘ϭ͘ϲ͘ϰ >ŝŐŚƟŶŐ
ϯ͘ϭ͘ϳ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞƐĂŶĚhƟůŝƟĞƐ
ϯ͘ϭ͘ϳ͘ϭ >ŽĐĂƟŽŶZĞƐƚƌŝĐƟŽŶƐ
ϯ͘ϭ͘ϳ͘Ϯ hƟůŝƚLJDĞƚĞƌƐ
ϯ͘ϭ͘ϳ͘ϯ >ŽĐĂƟŽŶŽĨdƌĂŶƐĨŽƌŵĞƌƐĂŶĚ'ĞŶĞƌĂƚŽƌƐ
ϯ͘ϭ͘ϳ͘ϰ ^ĐƌĞĞŶŝŶŐŽĨĂĐŬŇŽǁWƌĞǀĞŶƚĞƌƐ
ϯ͘ϭ͘ϳ͘ϱ ^ĐƌĞĞŶŝŶŐŽĨZŽŽŌŽƉDĞĐŚĂŶŝĐĂů
ƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚ
ϯ͘ϭ͘ϳ͘ϲ ^ƚŽƌŵǁĂƚĞƌDĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚ
ϯ͘ϮƵŝůĚŝŶŐĞƐŝŐŶ
ϯ͘Ϯ͘ϭ
ŶƚƌLJǁĂLJͬ>ŽďďLJĞƐŝŐŶ
ϯ͘Ϯ͘ϭ͘Ϯ 'ƌŽƵŶĚ&ůŽŽƌ&ƌŽŶƚĂŐĞ

44 DƵůƟĨĂŵŝůLJZĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂů
KďũĞĐƟǀĞĞƐŝŐŶ^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐŚĞĐŬůŝƐƚ/ƚĞŵƐ
ƉƉůŝĐĂŶƚ

ǀĂůƵĂƟŽŶ ^ƚĂī
ǀĂůƵĂƟŽŶLJ͗
Yes No N/A Yes No N/A
ǀĂůƵĂƟŽŶĂŶĚ
ƌĂǁŝŶŐZĞĨĞƌĞŶĐĞ
ϯ͘Ϯ͘ϮDĂƐƐŝŶŐĂŶĚƌƟĐƵůĂƟŽŶ
ϯ͘Ϯ͘Ϯ͘ϭ DĂƐƐŝŶŐƌĞĂŬƐ
ϯ͘Ϯ͘Ϯ͘Ϯ ƵŝůĚŝŶŐŽŵƉŽƐŝƟŽŶ
ϯ͘Ϯ͘Ϯ͘ϯ ZŽŽŇŝŶĞsĂƌŝĂƟŽŶ
ϯ͘Ϯ͘ϯƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂůĞƚĂŝůŝŶŐ
ϯ͘Ϯ͘ϯ͘ϭ ƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂůZŽŽĨĞƚĂŝůƐ
ϯ͘Ϯ͘ϯ͘Ϯ ƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂůĞƐŝŐŶ&ĞĂƚƵƌĞƐŽŶ
ůĞǀĂƟŽŶƐ

3.2.3.3 Windows
ϯ͘Ϯ͘ϰƵŝůĚŝŶŐDĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐĂŶĚ&ŝŶŝƐŚĞƐ
ϯ͘Ϯ͘ϰ͘ϭ ƉƉƌŽƉƌŝĂƚĞƵŝůĚŝŶŐDĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐ
ϯ͘Ϯ͘ϰ͘Ϯ /ŶĂƉƉƌŽƉƌŝĂƚĞƵŝůĚŝŶŐDĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐ
ϯ͘Ϯ͘ϰ͘ϯ KƚŚĞƌDĂƚĞƌŝĂůZĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ

3.2.4.4 Color
ϯ͘ϯŽŶƚĞdžƚ^ĞŶƐŝƟǀŝƚLJ
ϯ͘ϯ͘ϭĚũĂĐĞŶƚƚŽ
džŝƐƟŶŐZĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂůĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ
ϯ͘ϯ͘ϭ͘ϭ ,ĞŝŐŚƚdƌĂŶƐŝƟŽŶƐ
ϯ͘ϯ͘ϭ͘Ϯ tŝŶĚŽǁĚũĂĐĞŶƚƚŽZĞƐŝĚĞŶĐĞƐ
ϯ͘ϯ͘ϭ͘ϯ WĂƌŬŝŶŐ>ŽƚƐĚũĂĐĞŶƚƚŽZĞƐŝĚĞŶĐĞƐ
ϯ͘ϰ>ĂŶĚƐĐĂƉŝŶŐĂŶĚ>ŝŐŚƟŶŐ
ϯ͘ϰ͘ϭWůĂŶƟŶŐĂŶĚ,ĂƌĚƐĐĂƉĞ
ϯ͘ϰ͘ϭ͘ϭ WůĂŶƟŶŐWĂƩĞƌŶĂŶĚĞƐŝŐŶŽŶĐĞƉƚƐ
ϯ͘ϰ͘ϭ͘Ϯ ^ƚƌĞĞƚdƌĞĞƐ
ϯ͘ϰ͘ϭ͘ϯ ZŽŽƚĂƌƌŝĞƌZĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚ
ϯ͘ϰ͘ϭ͘ϰ ůĞĂƌĂŶĐĞĨƌŽŵhƟůŝƟĞƐ
ϯ͘ϰ͘ϭ͘ϱ WĂƌŬŝŶŐ>ŽƚWůĂŶƟŶŐ
ϯ͘ϰ͘ϭ͘ϲ WĂƌŬŝŶŐ^ƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ>ĂŶĚƐĐĂƉŝŶŐ
ϯ͘ϰ͘ϭ͘ϳ ^ƵƐƚĂŝŶĂďůĞ>ĂŶĚƐĐĂƉŝŶŐ
ϯ͘ϰ͘Ϯ>ŝŐŚƟŶŐ
ϯ͘ϰ͘Ϯ͘ϭ ^ƚƌĞĞƚ&ƌŽŶƚĂŐĞ>ŝŐŚƟŶŐ
ϯ͘ϰ͘Ϯ͘Ϯ WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶ>ŝŐŚƟŶŐ
ϯ͘ϰ͘Ϯ͘ϯ ^ƚƌĞĞƚ>ŝŐŚƟŶŐ
ϯ͘ϰ͘Ϯ͘ϰ /ŶĂƉƉƌŽƉƌŝĂƚĞ>ŝŐŚƟŶŐ

City of Daly City – Planning Division
General Plan Amendment GPA-8-24-16606 and
Zone Change ZC-8-24-16607

DRAFT CHAPTER 17.XX –

AIRPORT LAND USE COMPATIBILITY PLAN CONSISTENCY

17.xx.010 - General provisions.

This section establishes standards and requirements related to consistency with the Comprehensive Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan for the Environs of San Francisco International Airport (ALUCP). The following requirements and criteria shall be incorporated into all projects located within the Airport Influence Area applicable to Daly City in the Airport Land Use Plan.

17.xx.020 - Airport Real Estate Disclosure Notices. All new development, including all residential structures. shall be required to comply with the real estate disclosure requirements of California Business and Professions Code Section 11010(b)(13). The following statement shall be included in the notice of intention to offer the property for sale or lease:

“Notice of Airport in Vicinity. This property is presently located in the vicinity of an airport, within what is known as an airport influence area.

For that reason, the property may be subject to some of the annoyances or inconveniences associated with pr oximity to airport operations (for example: noise, vibration, or odors). Individual sensitivities to those annoyances can vary from person to person. You may wish to consider what airport annoyances, if any, are associated with the property before you comp lete your purchase and determine whether they are acceptable to you.”

17.xx.030 - General provisions Airport Noise Evaluation and Mitigation. Project applicants shall be required to evaluate potential airport noise impacts if the project is located within the CNEL 65 dB contour line of San Francisco International Airport (as mapped in the ALUCP). All projects so located shall be required to mitigate impacts to comply with the interior (CNEL 45 dB or lower, unless otherwise stated) and exterior noise standards established by the ALUCP or [insert city name] General Plan, whichever is more restrictive.

17.xx.040 - General provisions Avigation Easement. Any action that would either permit or result in the development or construction of a land use considered to be conditionally compatible with aircraft noise of CNEL 65 dB or greater (as mapped in the ALUCP) shall include the grant of an avigation easement to the City and County of San Francisco prior to issuance of a building permit(s) for any proposed buildings or structures, consistent with ALUCP Policy NP-3 Grant of Avigation Easement.

A. Maximum Compatible Building Height. Building heights, including related roof - mounted equipment, stair/elevator towers, antennae, exhaust stacks, and other appurtenances, shall not exceed the maximum height limits permissible under either FAA regulations or the Critical Aeronautical Surfaces identified in SFO ALUCP. For avoidance of doubt, the lower of the two heights identified by the ALUCP and the FAA shall be the controlling maximum height. Upon receiving any application for land use entitlement or buil ding permit, the Planning Division shall consult with SFO/CCAG to determine a proposed project’s compliance with this requirement.

B. Other Flight Hazards. Within Airport Influence Area (AIA) B, certain land use characteristics are recognized as hazards to air navigation and, per ALUCP Policy AP-4, need to be evaluated to ensure compatibility with FAA rules and regulations. These characteristics include the following:

1. Sources of glare, such as highly reflective buildings, building features, or blight lights including search lights, or laser displays, which would interfere with the vision of pilots in command of an aircraft in flight.

2. Distracting lights that could be mistaken for airport identification lightings, runway edge lighting, runway end identification lighting, or runway approach lighting.

3. Sources of dust, smoke, water vapor, or steam that may impair the visibility of a pilot in command of and aircraft in flight.

4. Sources of electrical/electronic interference with aircraft communications/navigation equipment.

5. Any use that creates an increased attraction for wildlife, particularly large flocks of birds, that is inconsistent with FAA rules and regulations, including but not limited to FAA Order 5200.5A, Waste Disposal Site On or Near Airports and FAA Advisory Circular 150/5200-33B, Hazardous Wildlife Attractants On or Near Airports and any successor or replacement orders or advisory circulars.

August 2024 | Addendum to Environmental Impact Report (EIR) State Clearinghouse Number 2012032024
2023-2031 Housing Element, Zoning, and
Sullivan Corridor Specific Plan Amendments
(GPA-8-24-16606 and ZC-8-24-16607):

Addendum No. 2 to the Daly City
General Plan Update EIR
City of Daly City

Prepared for:

City of Daly City
Contact: Michael Van Lonkhuysen, Planning Manager
City of Daly City | Economic & Community Development, Planning Division 333 90th Street
Daly City, California 94015
(650) 991-8158
[email protected]
Prepared by:

PlaceWorks
Contact: Terri McCracken, Principal
2040 Bancroft Way, Suite 400
Berkeley, California 94704
(510) 848-3815
[email protected]
www.placeworks.com

2023- 2031 HOUSING ELEMENT , ZONING, AND SULLIVAN CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS:

ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE DALY CITY GENERAL PLAN UPDATE EIR

CITY OF DALY CITY
Table of Contents
August 2024 Page 1
Section Page

1. INTRODUCTION ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ................ 3

1.1 BACKGROUND, PURPOSE, AND SCOPE ................................................................................................. 3

1.2 ENVIRONMENTAL PROCEDURES .......................................................................................................... 4

2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ..... 7

2.1 LOCATION AND SETTING ...................................................................................................................... 7

2.2 STUDY AREA .......................................................................................................................................... 7

2.3 BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................................................... 7

2.4 PROPOSED CHANGES ......................................................................................................................... 13

3. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS ................................ ................................ ................................ ........................... 23

3.1 AESTHETICS ......................................................................................................................................... 24

3.2 AIR QUALITY ........................................................................................................................................ 26

3.3 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES .................................................................................................................... 28

3.4 CULTURAL AND TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES ................................................................................. 29

3.5 ENERGY ............................................................................................................................................... 32

3.6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS .......................................................................................................................... 34

3.7 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS ........................................................................................................... 35

3.8 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ............................................................................................ 37

3.9 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY .................................................................................................... 39

3.10 LAND USE AND PLANNING ................................................................................................................. 41

3.11 NOISE .................................................................................................................................................. 42

3.12 POPULATION AND HOUSING .............................................................................................................. 43

3.13 PUBLIC SERVICES ................................................................................................................................ 44

3.14 RECREATION........................................................................................................................................ 45

3.15 TRANSPORTATION ............................................................................................................................... 46

3.16 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS ....................................................................................................... 48

3.17 WILDFIRE ............................................................................................................................................ 52

3.18 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE ......................................................................................... 53

4. CONCLUSION ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .................. 55

4.1 SUBSTANTIAL CHANGES TO THE PROJECT .......................................................................................... 55

4.2 SUBSTANTIAL CHANGES IN CIRCUMSTANCES .................................................................................... 55

4.3 NEW INFORMATION ........................................................................................................................... 56

5. LIST OF PREPARERS ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ........ 57 Tables
Table 1 2023-2031 Regional Housing Needs Allocation ................................................................................... 9 Table 2 Proposed Land Use Designations ....................................................................................................... 14 Table 3 Proposed Zoning Districts ................................................................................................................... 16 Table 4 Proposed Land Use Designations and Zoning Districts in the Sullivan Corridor Specific Plan Area .. 18 Table 5 Daly City General Plan EIR Buildout Numbers .................................................................................... 19 Table 6 Proposed Net New Buildout from Land Use Designation and Zoning District Amendments ............ 21

2023- 2031 HOUSING ELEMENT , ZONING, AND SULLIVAN CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS:

ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE DALY CITY GENERAL PLAN UPDATE EIR

CITY OF DALY CITY
Table of Contents

Figures
Figure 1 2023-2031 Housing Element Opportunity Sites .................................................................... 8 Figure 2 Priority Development Areas and Transit Priority Areas ....................................................... 11 Figure 3 Proposed Land Use Designations ........................................................................................ 15 Figure 4 Proposed Zoning Districts .................................................................................................... 17 Figure 5 Proposed Redesignation and Rezoning Sites ....................................................................... 20

August 2024 Page 3

1. Introduction

1.1 BACKGROUND, PURPOSE, AND SCOPE
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code [PRC] Sections 21000 et seq.) and the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations Sections 15000 et. seq.) recognize that between the date an environmental document is completed and the date the project is fully implemented, one or more of the following changes may occur: 1) the project may change; 2) the environmental setting in which the project is located may change; 3) laws, regulations, or policies may change in ways that impact the environment; and/or 4) previously unknown information can arise. Before proceeding with a project, CEQA requires the lead agency to evaluate these changes to determine whether or not they affect the conclusions in the environmental document.

The City of Daly City (City) certified the Daly City General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report (EIR), State Clearinghouse No. 2012032024, and approved the Daly City General Plan in March 2013. The General Plan includes multiple policies and associated actions that address housing. In December 2023, the City amended the Daly City General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and the Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) Station Area Specific Plan (BART Specific Plan) so that the parcels that make up the Mission Street and Geneva Avenue corridors have consistent General Plan and Specific Plan land use designations and zoning districts. The December 2023 amendments also established Commercial Mixed-Use (C-MU) Objective Design Standards to provide key, objective requirements for a clear and straightforward application and approval process for future multifamily housing and mixed-use construction within the C-MU zoning district. The December 2023 amendments were approved with the first Addendum to the General Plan EIR. The Daly City General Plan as amended is considered the “Approved Project,” and the General Plan EIR and subsequent Addendum are considered the “Certified EIR.” This document is the second Addendum to the Certified EIR.

The subject of this Addendum is an amendment to the Daly City General Plan Housing Element and subsequent amendments to the Daly City Municipal Code Title 17, Zoning, and Sullivan Corridor Specific Plan. Pursuant to State law, the housing element is a mandatory element of the General Plan and is required to be updated every eight years to ensure an adequate amount and type of housing is planned for in California. The proposed modifications to the current 2015-2023 Housing Element are required in order to demonstrate the City’s capacity to meet its “fair share” of the region’s housing needs allocation (RHNA) over the 2023-2031 planning period. As part of the proposed 2023-2031 Housing Element, some parcels will require General Plan and Specific Plan land use redesignations and rezoning from non-

2023- 2031 HOUSING ELEMENT , ZONING, AND SULLIVAN CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS :

ADDENDUM TO THE DALY CITY GENERAL PLAN UPDATE EIR

CITY OF DALY CITY

1. Introduction

residential uses to residential uses for the City to meet its regional housing obligation. The proposed 2023-2031 Housing Element includes changes that respond to new State laws related to affirmatively furthering fair housing, as well as deletion of completed programs, consolidation of similar or related programs, new programs responding to emerging issues, and amendments to other programs and/or revised timelines. Accordingly, the purpose of this Addendum is to analyze the impacts of the proposed amendments to the General Plan Housing Element (2023-2031 Housing Element), Daly City Municipal Code Title 17, Zoning, and Sullivan Corridor Specific Plan, herein referred to as the “proposed Modified Project.” The proposed Modified Project does not extend development potential beyond the boundaries analyzed in the Certified EIR. Pursuant to the provisions of CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines, the City of Daly City is the lead agency charged with the responsibility of deciding whether or not to approve the proposed action.

1.2 ENVIRONMENTAL PROCEDURES
Pursuant to CEQA Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 of the State, when an EIR has been certified or a negative declaration adopted for a project, no subsequent EIR or negative declaration shall be prepared for the project unless the lead agency determines that one or more of the following conditions are met:
 Substantial project changes are proposed that will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects;  Substantial changes would occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken that require major revisions to the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or
 New information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified, or the negative declaration was adopted shows any of the following:
a) The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative declaration.
b) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than identified in the previous EIR.
c) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponent declines to adopt the mitigation measures or alternatives. d) Mitigation measures or alternatives that are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponent declines to adopt the mitigation measures or alternatives.

2023- 2031 HOUSING ELEMENT , ZONING, AND SULLIVAN CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS :

ADDENDUM TO THE DALY CITY GENERAL PLAN UPDATE EIR

CITY OF DALY CITY

1. Introduction
August 2024 Page 5
Where none of the conditions specified in CEQA Guidelines Section 151621 are present, the lead agency must determine whether to prepare an Addendum or whether no further CEQA documentation is required (CEQA Guidelines Section 15162[b]). An Addendum is appropriate where some minor technical changes or additions to the previously certified EIR are necessary but there are no new or substantially more severe significant impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15164).

In accordance with the CEQA Guidelines, the City has determined that an Addendum to the Certified EIR is the appropriate environmental clearance for the proposed Modified Project. This Addendum reviews the changes proposed by the Modified Project and examines whether a subsequent EIR may be required as a result of any changes or new information. This examination includes an analysis of the provisions of Section 21166 of CEQA and Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines and their applicability to the proposed Modified Project. This Addendum relies on the attached environmental analysis, which addresses each environmental checklist issue section by section. The checklist includes findings as to the physical environmental impact of the proposed Modified Project in comparison with the findings of the Certified EIR.

1 See also Section 15163 of the State CEQA Guidelines, which applies the requirements of Section 15162 to supplemental EIRs.

2023- 2031 HOUSING ELEMENT , ZONING, AND SULLIVAN CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS :

ADDENDUM TO THE DALY CITY GENERAL PLAN UPDATE EIR

CITY OF DALY CITY

1. Introduction

This page has been intentionally left blank.

August 2024 Page 7

2. Project Description

2.1 LOCATION AND SETTING
Daly City is south of San Francisco on the northernmost edge of San Mateo County. It is bordered by the Pacific Ocean to the west, the city and county of San Francisco to the north, the city of Brisbane to the east, the town of Colma and the city of South San Francisco to the southeast, and the city of Pacifica to the southwest. The city limits for Daly City encompass approximately 7.6 square miles (4,864 acres), and, with the sphere of influence (SOI), incorporates a total of 8.5 square miles (5,442 acres).

2.2 STUDY AREA
The study area is the same as for the Certified EIR, which encompasses the lands within the city limits and SOI. Figure 1, 2023-2031 Housing Element Opportunity Sites, shows the city limits, the Sullivan Corridor Specific Plan area, and the proposed 2023-2031 Housing Element opportunity sites where potential future residential development could be accommodated.

2.3 BACKGROUND

2.3.1 Housing Element Law
State law requires each city and county to adopt a General Plan containing at least eight elements, including a Housing Element. Unlike the other mandatory General Plan elements, the Housing Element must be updated every eight years, is subject to detailed requirements of State law, and must be reviewed by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD). Housing element law requires local governments like Daly City to adequately plan to meet their existing and projected housing needs, including their share of the regional housing need. Housing Element law is the State’s primary market-based strategy to increase housing supply, choice, and affordability. The law recognizes that for the private sector to adequately address housing needs and demand, local governments must adopt land use plans and regulatory schemes that provide opportunities for, and do not unduly constrain, housing development.

Alto Loma
San Bruno
Mtn. SP
Mussel
Rock Park
San Bruno Mtn.

State and
County Park
San Bruno
Mtn. ER
Mis
sion Rd
Par
kPlaza D
r
Monterey Rd
EGrand Ave
Hickey Blvd Lawndale Blvd
ArroyoDr
Lake Mer
ced
Blvd
Park Way
SouthgateAve
Spruce Av
e
Airport BlvdHol
ly Ave
Mission St
Eastmoor Ave
SagamoreSt
Evergreen Dr
John Daly Blvd
Gateway Dr
Baysh
oreBlvd
Lux Ave
Westborough
Blvd
Miller Ave
School St
Chestnut Ave
Grand Ave
Sunnydale Ave
F St
Hoffman St
LindenAve
San
Pedro Rd
S Linden Ave
W
Oran
ge A v e
87th St
Ca
llan
Blvd
Oceana Blvd UtahAveSSpruce A
ve
GenevaAve
AltaMe
sa Dr
Bellevue Ave
Sisters Cities Blvd
Hillside Blvd
Jun
iperoSe
rraBlvd
Saint
Fran
cisBlvd
Sull
ivan A
ve
Serramonte Blvd
SkylineDr
AlemanyBlvd
(/101
280
82 35
1 2023-2031 Housing Element Opportunity Sites
Figure 1
Source: Daly City, 2023; PlaceWorks, 2024.
0 0.5 10.25
Miles
City Limit
Creeks and Waterways
Parks and Open Space
Sullivan Corridor
Specific Plan Area
Housing Element
Opportunity Sites

2. Project Description
2 0 2 3 - 2 0 3 1 HOU S I NG E L E M E N T , Z ON I NG , AND S U L L I V AN COR R I DOR S P E C I F I C P L AN AM E NDM E N T S :

ADD E ND UM NO . 2 T O T H E DA L Y C I T Y G E N E R A L P L AN U P DA T E E I R

CITY OF DALY CITY
PlaceWorks

2023- 2031 HOUSING ELEMENT , ZONING, AND SULLIVAN CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS :

ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE DALY CITY GENERAL PLAN UPDATE EIR

CITY OF DALY CITY

2. Project Description
August 2024 Page 9

2.3.2 Regional Housing Needs Allocation
The Housing Element process begins with the HCD allocating a region's share of the statewide housing need to councils of governments (COG) based on California Department of Finance population projections and regional population forecasts used to prepare regional transportation plans. The Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) serves as the regional COG in the San Francisco Bay Area and Daly City. In coordination with local governments, ABAG allocates the region’s share of the statewide need to the cities and counties in the Bay Area. This allocation is called the Regional Housing Need Allocation (RHNA) and is determined using a formula that considers population size, employment, proximity to transit, and access to resources such as schools, health care, parks, and services. In the most recent allocation, communities considered “high resource” areas received larger shares of lower income units as a strategy for improving housing equity across the region.2 The RHNA estimates are divided into income categories, with households categorized as very low income, low income, moderate income, or above moderate income.

Regional councils of government across California are responsible for allocating their region’s housing needs to individual cities and counties.

The total 2023-2031 RHNA for all counties and municipalities in the Bay Area is 441,176 units. San Mateo County and its 20 cities and towns received 10.8 percent of the regional housing assignment, or 47,687 units. Among the 20 cities and towns, Daly City received the second largest allocation after San Mateo— 4,838 units. The breakdown of units pursuant to income category is shown in Table 1, 2023-2031 Regional Housing Needs Allocation.

TABLE 1 2023-2031 REGIONAL HOUSING NEEDS ALLOCATION
Income Category Allocation Percentage
Very Low* 1,336 27%
Low 769 16%
Moderate 762 16%
Above Moderate 1,971 41%
Total 4,838 100%
Note: *It is assumed that 50 percent of the very low-income category (668 units) is allocated to the extremely low-income category.

Source: Association of Bay Area Government, updated November 2022, Final Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) Plan: San Francisco Bay Area, 2023-2031.

2 Pursuant to Government Code Section 65584.09, cities found to have provided adequate sites to meet the prior (2015-2023) RHNA are not required to add the unmet RHNA from the last (2015-2023) cycle to their 6th Cycle (2023-2031) totals.

2023- 2031 HOUSING ELEMENT , ZONING, AND SULLIVAN CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS :

ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE DALY CITY GENERAL PLAN UPDATE EIR

CITY OF DALY CITY

2. Project Description

In order to have a substantially compliant 2023-2031 Housing Element, the City is required to demonstrate that it has the zoning capacity to produce 4,838 units by 2031. The City is not required to issue building permits or entitlements for this quantity of housing. However, the number of units permitted annually (by income category) will be used as a metric to evaluate the success of the proposed 2023-2031 Housing Element and the need for additional programs to come closer to the targets.

2.3.3 Plan Bay Area
The Metropolitan Transportation Commission’s and ABAG’s Plan Bay Area is the San Francisco Bay Area’s Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Community Strategy. Plan Bay Area is the long-range integrated transportation and land use/housing strategy through 2050 for the Bay Area pursuant to the Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act, commonly referred to by its legislative bill number, Senate Bill (SB) 375. Plan Bay Area lays out a development scenario for the region, which, when integrated with the transportation network and other transportation measures and policies, would reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from transportation vehicle miles traveled (VMT) (excluding goods movement) beyond the per capita reduction targets identified by the California Air Resources Board. As shown on Figure 2, Priority Development Areas and Transit Priority Areas, the study area includes the Mission Boulevard and Bayshore Priority Development Areas (PDA) as well as two Transit Priority Areas (TPA). As part of the implementing framework for Plan Bay Area, PDAs and TPAs are identified as areas where concentrated development can have beneficial environmental effects and reduce adverse environmental impacts.

2.3.3.1 PRIORITY DEVELOPMENT AREAS
A PDA is a place that has convenient public transit service, often referred to as “transit oriented,” that is prioritized by local governments such as Daly City for housing, jobs, and services in existing communities.

A PDA is a funding and planning tool. If a local jurisdiction voluntarily nominates an area for PDA designation, the designation gives the local jurisdiction access to funds and grants to develop and adopt area plans to plan for, design, and regulate future growth of the area and construct needed and/or planned infrastructure improvements.
3 PDAs are voluntarily nominated by the local jurisdiction. Further, the local jurisdiction has the full discretion to set the boundaries of the PDA within the eligible PDA areas that have been identified by Plan Bay Area.

3 Metropolitan Transportation Commission, Priority Development Areas (PDAs), https://mtc.ca.gov/planning/land-use/priority- development-areas-pdas, accessed August 1, 2023.

Alto Loma
San Bruno
Mtn. SP
Mussel
Rock Park
San Bruno Mtn.

State and
County Park
San Bruno
Mtn. ER
Mis
sion Rd
Par
kPlaza D
r
Monterey Rd
EGrand Ave
Hickey Blvd Lawndale Blvd
ArroyoDr
Lake Mer
ced
Blvd
Park Way
SouthgateAve
Spruce Av
e
Airport BlvdHol
ly Ave
Mission St
Eastmoor Ave
SagamoreSt
Evergreen Dr
John Daly Blvd
Gateway Dr
Baysh
oreBlvd
Lux Ave
Westborough
Blvd
Miller Ave
School St
Chestnut Ave
Grand Ave
Sunnydale Ave
F St
Hoffman St
LindenAve
San
Pedro Rd
S Linden Ave
W
Oran
ge A v e
87th St
Ca
llan
Blvd
Oceana Blvd UtahAveSSpruce A
ve
GenevaAve
AltaMe
sa Dr
Bellevue Ave
Sisters Cities Blvd
Hillside Blvd
Jun
ipero S
erraBlvd
Saint
Fran
cisBlvd
Sull
ivan A
ve
Serramonte Blvd
SkylineDr
AlemanyBlvd
(/101
280
82 35
1 Priority Development Areas and Transit Priority Areas Figure 2
Source: Daly City, 2022; ABAG/MTC, 2023; PlaceWorks, 2024. 0 0.5 10.25
Miles
City Limit
Creeks and Waterways
Parks and Open Space
Sullivan Corridor Specific
Plan Area
Transit Priority Areas
Priority Development Areas
Mission Boulevard
Bayshore

2. Project Description
2 0 2 3 - 2 0 3 1 HOU S I NG E L E M E N T , Z ON I NG , AND S U L L I V AN COR R I DOR S P E C I F I C P L AN AM E NDM E N T S :

ADD E ND UM NO . 2 T O T H E DA L Y C I T Y G E N E R A L P L AN U P DA T E E I R

CITY OF DALY CITY
PlaceWorks

2023- 2031 HOUSING ELEMENT , ZONING, AND SULLIVAN CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS :

ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE DALY CITY GENERAL PLAN UPDATE EIR

CITY OF DALY CITY

2. Project Description

Overall, well over two-thirds of all regional growth in the San Francisco Bay Area by 2050 is projected to occur in PDAs. The PDAs identified in Plan Bay Area were projected to accommodate 72 percent (or over 985,000 units) of new housing and 48 percent (or 679,000) of new jobs in the region.4 Development in PDAs leverages existing infrastructure and therefore can minimize development in greenfield (undeveloped) areas and maximize growth in transit-rich communities to help lower VMT and consequently reduce GHG emissions, air quality pollutants, and noise from vehicles with internal combustion engines dependent on fossil fuels. Additionally, due to the location, infill development in PDAs result in fewer impacts related to agricultural, forestry, mineral, archaeological, and biological resources; energy; geology and soils; hydrology and water quality; and wildfire.

Many of the proposed 2023-2031 Housing Element opportunity sites are in PDAs. Certain potential future residential or mixed-use residential projects and projects in PDAs that meet defined criteria in the CEQA Guidelines may be eligible for CEQA streamlining. For example, while not exclusive to PDAs, due to their urban setting, development in a PDA is more likely to qualify for a CEQA Guidelines Section 15332, Class 32 (Infill Development) Categorical Exemption.

2.3.3.2 TRANSIT PRIORITY AREAS
Plan Bay Area also identifies TPAs, which are areas within 0.5 miles of a major transit stop (i.e., a stop with service frequency of 15 minutes or less), existing or planned, if the planned stop is scheduled to be completed within the planning horizon of a Transportation Improvement Program adopted pursuant to Section 450.216 or Section 450.322 of Title 23 of the Code of Federal Regulations. TPAs generally include existing neighborhoods served by transit and contain a wide range of housing options along with jobs, schools, and amenities. As with the PDAs, many of the proposed 2023-2031 Housing Element opportunity sites are in TPAs. Certain potential future development projects 5 in TPAs that meet defined criteria in the
CEQA Guidelines may be eligible for CEQA streamlining.

SB 743, which became effective on January 1, 2014, amended CEQA by adding CEQA Section 21099 regarding analysis of transportation, aesthetics, and parking impacts for urban infill projects, among other provisions. With respect to transportation impacts, SB 743 required the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) to identify new metrics for identifying and mitigating transportation impacts under CEQA, shifting from a congestion-based standard (level of service or LOS) to a VMT standard. According to guidance provided by the OPR in Transportation Impacts (SB 743) CEQA Guidelines Update and Technical Advisory, development within 0.5 miles of an existing major transit stop or an existing stop along a high- quality transit corridor will have a less-than-significant impact on VMT. Within the Daly City boundaries, both Geneva Avenue and Mission Street are considered high-quality transit corridors. A high-quality

4 Metropolitan Transportation Commission, October 2021, Plan Bay Area 2050, https://planbayarea.org/sites/default/files/documents/Plan_Bay_Area_2050_October_2021.pdf, accessed August 2, 2023. 5 A project in a transit priority area is referred to as a transit priority project or sometimes referred to as a TPP development.

2023- 2031 HOUSING ELEMENT , ZONING, AND SULLIVAN CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS :

ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE DALY CITY GENERAL PLAN UPDATE EIR

CITY OF DALY CITY

2. Project Description
August 2024 Page 13
transit corridor contains fixed-route bus service with headways of no longer than 15 minutes during peak commute hours, as defined in CEQA Section 21155.

2.4 PROPOSED CHANGES
The proposed Modified Project consists of amendments to the Daly City General Plan Housing Element, Daly City Municipal Code Title 17, Zoning, and Sullivan Corridor Specific Plan, which are described in detail below. In summary, the proposed Modified Project consists of updating the 2015-2023 Daly City Housing Element and amending the Daly City Municipal Code Title 17, Zoning, and Sullivan Corridor Specific Plan to be consistent with the Daly City General Plan. The proposed Modified Project is a programmatic, policy- level change that does not propose specific development projects. Future development projects on the identified 2023-2031 Housing Element opportunity sites would be subject to applicable environmental review in accordance with CEQA, if required.

2.4.1 2023-2031 Housing Element
Daly City’s current Housing Element has a planning period of January 31, 2015, to January 31, 2023. State law requires that the City’s next Housing Element cover the period from February 1, 2023, through January 31, 2031. While the proposed 2023-2031 Housing Element would lapse the Daly City General Plan horizon of 2030, it would only be by one month (December 2030 to January 2031). It is expected that the City would prepare a General Plan Update by then and reconsider citywide buildout potential and an extended buildout horizon year as part of that process.

The 2023-2031 Housing Element provides a comprehensive analysis of the status of housing in Daly City, and sets forth goals, policies, and programs (tasks) to improve the quality of housing stock and increase housing opportunities in Daly City. Like other parts of the Daly City General Plan, the Housing Element has been prepared in the context of urban transformation that will result from an ever-increasing population and mandates from State and regional agencies to build housing near existing transit. The policies in the element are intended to provide a framework for evaluating specific housing proposals; establish a coordinated, realistic course of action for dealing with Daly City’s concerns; and be a tool for decision makers when considering the approval of housing construction projects.

As discussed in Section 3.2.1, Regional Housing Needs Allocation, in order to have a substantially compliant 2023-2031 Housing Element, the City needs to show that it has capacity to meet the RHNA requirement of 4,838 units by 2031. The City has identified existing capacity for 3,985 new units under current land use designations and zoning districts through pipeline projects and vacant and underutilized sites. However, the existing capacity would not completely meet the RHNA requirements; therefore, the City is proposing amendments to the land use designations for specific parcels that would accommodate an additional realistic capacity of 1,110 new units that, when combined with the existing capacity for

2023- 2031 HOUSING ELEMENT , ZONING, AND SULLIVAN CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS :

ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE DALY CITY GENERAL PLAN UPDATE EIR

CITY OF DALY CITY

2. Project Description

3,985 units, would meet the RHNA of 4,838 units and provide a surplus of 256 new units.6 The seven parcels proposed for redesignation are shown on Figure 3, Proposed Land Use Designations, and in Table 2, Proposed Land Use Designations.

TABLE 2 PROPOSED LAND USE DESIGNATIONS
Assessor’s Parcel Number Existing Land Use Designations Proposed Land Use Designations 006-252-080 Residential Medium Low Density (R-MLD) Residential High Density (R-HD) 008-104-110 a Public Facilities (PF) b Residential High Density (R-HD) 008-104-120 a Public Facilities (PF) b Residential High Density (R-HD) 008-520-180 a Public Facilities (PF) b Residential High Density (R-HD) 008-520-190 a Public Facilities (PF) b Residential High Density (R-HD) 008-521-110 a Commercial Office (C-O) Residential High Density (R-HD) 091-247-080 a Commercial Retail and Office (C-RO) Residential Very High Density (R-VHD) Notes:
a. These parcels have also been proposed for rezoning (see Table 3, Proposed Zoning Districts, for more details). b. These parcels have a land use designation of Public Facilities (PF) in the Daly City General Plan, but a land use designation of Hospital (HOSP) in the Sullivan Corridor Specific Plan (see Table 4, Proposed Land Use Designations and Zoning Districts in the Sullivan Corridor Specific Plan Area).

Source: City of Daly City, 2023, City of Daly City 2023-2031 Housing Element.

In addition, the proposed Modified Project would increase the allowable residential densities as follows to allow for additional capacity to meet the RHNA:
 Residential – Medium Low Density General Plan Land Use Designation from 14.6 to 20 dwelling units per acre to 14.6 to 35 dwelling units per acre.
 Residential – Medium Density General Plan Land Use Designation from 20.1 to 35 dwelling units per acre to 35.1 to 60 dwelling units per acre.
 Residential – Very High Density General Plan Land Use Designation to a minimum of 120.1 dwelling units per acre.

6 No-Net-Loss (Government Code Section 65863). The City has identified a surplus of sites available to meet the RHNA allocation.

Surplus sites are “back-up” sites that are identified for housing in the event an identified housing element site becomes unavailable. In total, the City’s surplus unit capacity is 256, consisting of 34 lower-income units, 134 moderate-income units, and 87 above moderate-income units.

Alto Loma
San Bruno
Mtn. SP
Mussel
Rock Park
San Bruno Mtn.

State and
County Park
San Bruno
Mtn. ER
Mis
sion Rd
Par
kPlaza D
r
Monterey Rd
EGrand Ave
Hickey Blvd Lawndale Blvd
ArroyoDr
Lake Mer
ced
Blvd
Park Way
SouthgateAve
Spruce Av
e
Airport BlvdHol
ly Ave
Mission St
Eastmoor Ave
SagamoreSt
Evergreen Dr
John Daly Blvd
Gateway Dr
Baysh
oreBlvd
Lux Ave
Westborough
Blvd
Miller Ave
School St
Chestnut Ave
Grand Ave
Sunnydale Ave
F St
Hoffman St
LindenAve
San
Pedro Rd
S Linden Ave
W
Oran
ge A v e
87th St
Ca
llan
Blvd
Oceana Blvd UtahAveSSpruce A
ve
GenevaAve
AltaMe
sa Dr
Bellevue Ave
Sisters Cities Blvd
Hillside Blvd
Jun
ipero S
erraBlvd
Saint
Fran
cisBlvd
Sull
ivan A
ve
Serramonte Blvd
SkylineDr
AlemanyBlvd
(/101
280
82 35
1 Proposed Land Use Designations
Figure 3
Source: Daly City, 2023; PlaceWorks, 2023.
0 0.5 10.25
Miles
City Limit
Creeks and Waterways
Parks and Open Space
Sullivan Corridor Specific
Plan Area
Existing Land Use Designations
Residential Medium Low
Density (R-MLD)
Commercial Mixed-Use (C-
MU)
Commercial Office (C-O)
Public Facilities (PF)/Hospital
(HOSP)
Proposed Land Use
Designations
Residential High Density (R-
HD)
Residential Very High Density
(R-VHD)

2. Project Description
2 0 2 3 - 2 0 3 1 HOU S I NG E L E M E N T , Z ON I NG , AND S U L L I V AN COR R I DOR S P E C I F I C P L AN AM E NDM E N T S :

ADD E ND UM NO . 2 T O T H E DA L Y C I T Y G E N E R A L P L AN U P DA T E E I R

CITY OF DALY CITY
PlaceWorks
Alto Loma
Southgate Ave
Eastmoor Ave
F St
San Ped
ro Rd
Hillside Blvd
Sain
t Fran
cisBlvd
Sul
livan Ave
Serramonte Blvd
Junipe
ro S
erra Blv
d
280
1 35
82

2023- 2031 HOUSING ELEMENT , ZONING, AND SULLIVAN CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS :

ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE DALY CITY GENERAL PLAN UPDATE EIR

CITY OF DALY CITY

2. Project Description

2.4.2 Amendments to Zoning
To ensure consistency with the Daly City General Plan, amendments to the Daly City Municipal Code Title 17, Zoning, are included as part of the proposed Modified Project. These amendments include rezoning of seven parcels, as shown on Figure 4, Proposed Zoning Districts, and in Table 3, Proposed Zoning Districts.

TABLE 3 PROPOSED ZONING DISTRICTS
Assessor’s Parcel Number Existing Zoning Districts Proposed Zoning Districts 003-224-100 Planned Development (Permitting Office) Planned Development (Permitting Residential) 008-104-110 * Hospital (HOSP) Multiple Family (R-3)
008-104-120 * Hospital (HOSP) Multiple Family (R-3)
008-520-180 * Hospital (HOSP) Multiple Family (R-3)
008-520-190 * Hospital (HOSP) Multiple Family (R-3)
008-521-110 * Office Commercial (C-O) Multiple Family (R-3) 091-247-080 * Planned Development (Permitting Hotel) Planned Development (Permitting Residential) Note: *These parcels have also been proposed for new land use designations (see Table 2, Proposed Land Use Designations, for more details).

Source: City of Daly City, 2023, City of Daly City 2023-2031 Housing Element.

The proposed Modified Project would amend the regulations in the Multiple Family (R-3) and Commercial Mixed-Use (C-MU) zoning districts. The Multiple Family (R-3) zoning district would be amended to:
 Require that all new development be multiple family residential in nature only, constructed pursuant to the density parameters established by the General Plan, and without the requirement for design review, unless by objective standards;
 Amend the maximum building height to 120 feet (plus 15 additional feet may be permitted for elevator shafts and rooftop mechanical equipment). All allowable heights would be subject to additional height limitations imposed by San Francisco International Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (SFO ALUCP);
 Amend the minimum lot area for new parcels to one acre;  Remove the maximum lot coverage; and
 Remove the regulation pertaining to lot area per dwelling unit and instead require the approved General Plan densities.

Alto Loma
San Bruno
Mtn. SP
Mussel
Rock Park
San Bruno Mtn.

State and
County Park
San Bruno
Mtn. ER
Mis
sion Rd
Par
kPlaza D
r
Monterey Rd
EGrand Ave
Hickey Blvd Lawndale Blvd
ArroyoDr
Lake Mer
ced
Blvd
Park Way
SouthgateAve
Spruce Av
e
Airport BlvdHol
ly Ave
Mission St
Eastmoor Ave
SagamoreSt
Evergreen Dr
John Daly Blvd
Gateway Dr
Baysh
oreBlvd
Lux Ave
Westborough
Blvd
Miller Ave
School St
Chestnut Ave
Grand Ave
Sunnydale Ave
F St
Hoffman St
LindenAve
San
Pedro Rd
S Linden Ave
W
Oran
ge A v e
87th St
Ca
llan
Blvd
Oceana Blvd UtahAveSSpruce A
ve
GenevaAve
AltaMe
sa Dr
Bellevue Ave
Sisters Cities Blvd
Hillside Blvd
Jun
ipero S
erraBlvd
Saint
Fran
cisBlvd
Sull
ivan A
ve
Serramonte Blvd
SkylineDr
AlemanyBlvd
(/101
280
82 35
1 Proposed Zoning Districts
Figure 4
Source: Daly City, 2023; PlaceWorks, 2024.
0 0.5 10.25
Miles
City Limit
Creeks and Waterways
Parks and Open Space
Sullivan Corridor Specific
Plan Area
Existing Zoning
Designations
Office Commercial (C-O)
Hospital (HOSP)
Planned Development
(Permitting Hotel)
Planned Development
(Permitting Office)
Proposed Zoning
Designations
Multiple Family (R-3)
Planned Development
(Permitting Residential)

2. Project Description
2 0 2 3 - 2 0 3 1 HOU S I NG E L E M E N T , Z ON I NG, AND S U L L I V AN COR R I DOR S P E C I F I C P L AN AM E NDM E N T S :

ADD E ND UM NO . 2 T O T H E DA L Y C I T Y G E N E R A L P L AN U P DA T E E I R

CITY OF DALY CITY
PlaceWorks
Hillside Blvd
John DalyBlvd
School St
F St
Westlake Ave
San Ped
ro Rd
Eastmoor Ave
Park P
laza
Dr
87th St
SouthgateAveSaint
Fran
cis
Blvd
Sullivan
Ave
Serramonte Blvd
Juni
pero
Serra
Blvd
280
82 1

2023- 2031 HOUSING ELEMENT , ZONING, AND SULLIVAN CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS :

ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE DALY CITY GENERAL PLAN UPDATE EIR

CITY OF DALY CITY

2. Project Description

The Commercial Mixed-Use (C-MU) zoning district would be amended to permit development of up to 175 feet in height, with an allowance that stair and elevator towers at the building roof may exceed the maximum building height by up to 15 feet. This proposed revision would stipulate that all allowable heights would be subject to additional height limitations imposed by SFO ALUCP.

In addition, a new chapter titled “Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan Consistency,” would be added to Title 17, Zoning, of the Daly City Municipal Code to include requirements for the evaluation of potential airport noise impacts within the SFO ALUCP Community Noise Equivalent Level 65 dB contour line, the provision of avigation easements for conditionally compatible land uses, and the codification of maximum building heights per Federal Aviation Administration regulations and Critical Aeronautical Surfaces identified in the SFO ALUCP .

2.4.3 Amendments to the Sullivan Corridor Specific Plan The Sullivan Corridor Specific Plan addresses a nearly 200-acre area partially within central Daly City, west of Junipero Cerro Boulevard. To remain consistent with the Daly City General Plan, five parcels in the Sullivan Corridor Specific Plan area would need their Specific Plan land use designation amended to Residential High Density (R-HD) as part of the proposed Modified Project. These parcels are shown on Figures 3 and 4. While these parcels have been included in Tables 2 and 3, they have been extrapolated to create Table 4, Proposed Land Use Designations and Zoning Districts in the Sullivan Corridor Specific Plan Area.

TABLE 4 PROPOSED LAND USE DESIGNATIONS AND ZONING DISTRICTS IN THE SULLIVAN CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN AREA Assessor’s
Parcel Number
Specific Plan Land Use Designations Specific Plan Zoning Districts Existing Proposed Existing Proposed
008-104-110 Hospital (HOSP) Residential High Density (R-HD) Hospital (HOSP) Multiple Family (R-3) 008-104-120 Hospital (HOSP) Residential High Density (R-HD) Hospital (HOSP) Multiple Family (R-3) 008-520-180 Hospital (HOSP) Residential High Density (R-HD) Hospital (HOSP) Multiple Family (R-3) 008-520-190 Hospital (HOSP) Residential High Density (R-HD) Hospital (HOSP) Multiple Family (R-3) 008-521-110 Commercial Office
(C-O) Residential High Density (R-HD) Office Commercial (C-O) Multiple Family (R-3)
Note: These parcels are also shown in Table 2, Proposed Land Use Designations, and Table 3, Proposed Zoning Districts Source: City of Daly City, 2023, City of Daly City 2023-2031 Housing Element.

2023- 2031 HOUSING ELEMENT , ZONING, AND SULLIVAN CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS :

ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE DALY CITY GENERAL PLAN UPDATE EIR

CITY OF DALY CITY

2. Project Description
August 2024 Page 19

2.4.4 Buildout Potential
Table 5, Daly City General Plan EIR Buildout Numbers, shows the total Daly City General Plan EIR buildout that was analyzed in the Certified EIR.

TABLE 5 DALY CITY GENERAL PLAN EIR BUILDOUT NUMBERS

General Plan Existing
(2008)
General Plan Buildout
(2030)
Increase
(2008-2030)
Housing Units 31,778 33,935 2,157
Households a 31,090 32,239 1,149
Population b 101,123 106,388 5,265
Jobs 17,656 21,646 3,990
Notes:
a. Households were estimated to be 95 percent of the total housing units, assuming a 5 percent vacancy rate. b. Buildout population was calculated assuming 3.3 persons per household.

Source: City of Daly, October 2012, City of Daly City General Plan Update Draft Environmental Impact Report, SCH # 2012032024.

Because the proposed 2023-2031 Housing Element opportunity sites include pipeline projects and vacant and underutilized sites that could accommodate housing development that counts toward the RHNA under current land use designations and zoning districts, this Addendum only considers the housing opportunity sites that would require amendments to the land use designations and zoning districts to accommodate future residential development that counts toward the RHNA plus the surplus sites. These sites are shown on Figure 5, Proposed Redesignation and Rezoning Sites. Because the surplus sites are “back-up” sites that are identified for housing in the event an identified housing element site becomes unavailable, the evaluation of these sites presents a conservative evaluation of impact.

Table 6, Proposed Net New Buildout from Changes to Land Use Designation and Zoning District Amendments, shows the net new units that were not anticipated in the Certified EIR. As shown in Table 6, the current land use designations and zoning districts for the housing opportunity sites listed in Tables 2, 3, and 4 allow for a total of only 20 units. With the redesignations and rezoning of the proposed Modified Project, the new maximum capacity of these sites would be 1,494 units. 7 Accordingly, this Addendum
analyzes the environmental impacts of the 1,474 net new units that require amendments to the land use designation and zoning district from non-residential and medium-low density residential uses, as shown in Tables 2, 3, and 4 (i.e., R-MLD, PF/HOSP , C-O, C-MU, Planned Development permitting Office and Hotel uses).

7 Note that the Housing Element, pursuant to guidance from the California Department of Housing and Community Development, assigns a reduced or realistic capacity in the event that not every site is built out to 100 percent capacity.

However, for the purposes of assessing environmental impacts, this Addendum assumes a maximum capacity to ensure the greatest potential for impacts is evaluated.

Alto Loma
San Bruno
Mtn. SP
Mussel
Rock Park
San Bruno Mtn.

State and
County Park
San Bruno
Mtn. ER
Mis
sion Rd
Par
kPlaza D
r
Monterey Rd
EGrand Ave
Hickey Blvd Lawndale Blvd
ArroyoDr
Lake Mer
ced
Blvd
Park Way
SouthgateAve
Spruce Av
e
Airport BlvdHol
ly Ave
Mission St
Eastmoor Ave
SagamoreSt
Evergreen Dr
John Daly Blvd
Gateway Dr
Baysh
oreBlvd
Lux Ave
Westborough
Blvd
Miller Ave
School St
Chestnut Ave
Grand Ave
Sunnydale Ave
F St
Hoffman St
LindenAve
San
Pedro Rd
S Linden Ave
W
Oran
ge A v e
87th St
Ca
llan
Blvd
Oceana Blvd UtahAveSSpruce A
ve
GenevaAve
AltaMe
sa Dr
Bellevue Ave
Sisters Cities Blvd
Hillside Blvd
Jun
ipero S
erraBlvd
Saint
Fran
cisBlvd
Sull
ivan A
ve
Serramonte Blvd
SkylineDr
AlemanyBlvd
(/101
280
82 35
1 Proposed Redesignation and Rezoning Sites
Figure 5
Source: Daly City, 2022; ABAG/MTC, 2023; PlaceWorks, 2024. 0 0.5 10.25
Miles
City Limit
Creeks and Waterways
Parks and Open Space
Sullivan Corridor Specific
Plan Area
Proposed Redesignation
and Rezoning Sites
Transit Priority Areas
Priority Development Areas
Mission Boulevard
Bayshore

2. Project Description
2 0 2 3 - 2 0 3 1 HOU S I NG E L E M E N T , Z ON I NG , AND S U L L I V AN COR R I DOR S P E C I F I C P L AN AM E NDM E N T S :

ADD E ND UM NO . 2 T O T H E DA L Y C I T Y G E N E R A L P L AN U P DA T E E I R

CITY OF DALY CITY
PlaceWorks

2023- 2031 HOUSING ELEMENT , ZONING, AND SULLIVAN CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS :

ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE DALY CITY GENERAL PLAN UPDATE EIR

CITY OF DALY CITY

2. Project Description
August 2024 Page 21
TABLE 6 PROPOSED NET NEW BUILDOUT FROM LAND USE DESIGNATION AND ZONING DISTRICT AMENDMENTS

Maximum Capacity
Existing Land Use Designations
and Zoning Districts
Maximum Capacity
Proposed Land Use Designations
and Zoning Districts Net New Capacity
Housing Units 20 1,494 1,474
Household a 19 1,419 1,400
Population b 63 4,684 4,621
Notes:
a. Households were estimated to be 95 percent of the total housing units, assuming a 5 percent vacancy rate. b. Buildout population was calculated assuming 3.3 persons per household.

Source: City of Daly City, 2023.

Despite the increase in potential buildout capacity, it is important to note that the proposed Modified Project is a policy document that does not propose specific development and only identifies opportunity sites for future residential development to meet the RHNA for Daly City. All potential future development under the proposed Modified Project would be subject to applicable State and/or City regulations and requirements and undergo an appropriate level of environmental review of project-specific impacts, as required.

2023- 2031 HOUSING ELEMENT , ZONING, AND SULLIVAN CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS :

ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE DALY CITY GENERAL PLAN UPDATE EIR

CITY OF DALY CITY

2. Project Description

This page has been intentionally left blank.

August 2024 Page 23

3. Environmental Analysis
As detailed in Section 2.4, Proposed Changes, the proposed Modified Project would provide additional opportunities for housing developments to meet the RHNA requirements for Daly City. The proposed Modified Project would amend the General Plan land use designations and zoning districts for seven parcels, and the Sullivan Corridor Specific Plan land use designations for five parcels. As a result of the proposed Modified Project, there would be an opportunity for 1,474 net new housing units beyond what was evaluated in the Certified EIR. The proposed changes of the Modified Project would predominantly affect designated infill sites that are currently intended for medium-low density residential, public facilities (hospital), commercial offices, commercial mixed-use, or planned development (permitting office and hotel) under the Approved Project, and most of which are in walkable, transit-served commercial areas that are already developed and in close proximity to existing residential and residential-serving development. In other words, the amendments to the land use designations and zoning districts replace one type of development with another type of development. No greenfield or undeveloped parcels are affected by the proposed Modified Project.

Despite the increase in future residential development capacity on a limited number of parcels, the implementation of the proposed Modified Project is strictly a policy document that does not provide entitlements to any specific development projects. All potential future development under the proposed Modified Project would be subject to applicable State and/or City regulations and requirements and undergo an appropriate level of environmental review of project-specific impacts, as required.

CEQA identifies and analyzes the significant effects on the environment, where “significant effect on the environment” means a substantial or potentially substantial adverse change in physical condition (CEQA Guidelines Section 15382). The proposed Modified Project, which proposes amendments to the type of development that can occur on certain parcels evaluated under the Certified EIR, is analyzed by environmental topic in the sections that follow.

2023- 2031 HOUSING ELEMEN T , ZONING, AND SULLIVAN CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS :

ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE DALY CITY GENERAL PLAN UPDATE EIR

CITY OF DALY CITY

3. Environmental Analysis

3.1 AESTHETICS
Would the proposed Modified Project:

Level of
Impact in
Certified EIR
Impacts of the Modified Project Compared to Certified EIR:

Same or
Reduced
Impact?
New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New
or
More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a
scenic vista? LTS Yes No No No
b) Substantially damage scenic resources,
including, but not limited to, trees, rock
outcroppings, and historic buildings
within a state scenic highway?
LTS Yes No No No
c) In non-urbanized areas, substantially
degrade the existing visual character or
quality of the site and its surroundings,
or in an urbanized area, conflict with
applicable zoning and other
regulations governing scenic quality?

LTS Yes No No No
d) Create a new source of substantial
light or glare which would adversely
affect day or nighttime views in the
area?

LTS Yes No No No
Key: NI = no impact; LTS = less than significant; LTS/M = less than significant with mitigation; SU = significant and unavoidable Discussion:

The Certified EIR found that the Approved Project would not affect scenic vistas, would not result in the substantial degradation of the existing visual character of the city, and would not result in increased light and glare. Scenic resources and corridors, as defined in the Daly City General Plan, include the coastline, San Bruno Mountains, Skyline Boulevard, Cabrillo Highway, Junipero Serra Freeway, John Daly Boulevard, and Guadalupe Canyon Parkway. Pedestrian-level views of these scenic resources from public viewing locations are currently obstructed due to the natural topography, existing mature trees, and existing buildings.

The proposed Modified Project would change the maximum height allowances in place for the Multiple Family (R-3) zoning district and the Commercial Mixed-Use (C-MU) zoning districts in Daly City. As described in Section 2.4.2, Amendments to Zoning, the maximum building height in the R-3 district would be 120 feet and the maximum height in the C-MU district would be 175 feet. Under both districts, an additional 15 feet may be permitted for elevator shafts and rooftop mechanical equipment and would be subject to height limitations imposed by the SFO ALUCP. However, due to the existing urban setting of the city, the pedestrian-level scenic views from public viewing locations are already obstructed by the natural topography, existing mature trees, and existing buildings. The Certified EIR states that views of the coast are limited to locations along streets adjacent to the coastline, and views of San Bruno Mountains can

2023- 2031 HOUSING ELEMENT , ZONING, AND SULLIVAN CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS :

ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE DALY CITY GENERAL PLAN UPDATE EIR

CITY OF DALY CITY

3. Environmental Analysis
August 2024 Page 25
only be accessed where the elevation is higher than the rest of the city, like portions of Skyline Boulevard and Cabrillo Highway. Scenic views cannot be accessed from and around the housing opportunity sites proposed for redesignation and rezoning due to the existing conditions of the area; thus, any increased height of future residential developments along these scenic corridors at the locations affected by the proposed Modified Project would not negatively impact scenic vistas or views.

CEQA Section 21071, Urbanized Area; Definition, has several metrics by which an incorporated city can be defined as an “urbanized” area. CEQA Section 21071(a)(1) states that an incorporated city can be classified as an urbanized area if the city has a population of at least 100,000 persons. Daly City had 102,875 residents in 2022, according to the most recent Department of Finance estimates. Therefore, Daly City is considered an urbanized area under CEQA Section 21071 and impacts of potential future development projects in Daly City are based on whether the proposed Modified Project conflicts with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality. Like the Approved Project, all potential future development under the proposed Modified Project would be required to be consistent with the Daly City General Plan policies, Zoning Ordinance, and other design regulations governing scenic quality, and therefore would not result in a new impact or a substantial increase in magnitude of the existing impacts identified in the Certified EIR related to visual character .

Since Daly City is primarily built out, the light and glare in the city is typical of an urban setting, and implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not create a new source of substantial light or glare. Additionally, the proposed Modified Project would replace non-residential uses with residential uses, which would result in less light and glare. Accordingly, the proposed Modified Project would not result in a new impact or a substantial increase in magnitude of the existing impacts identified in the Certified EIR with respect to aesthetics.

Furthermore, in accordance with CEQA Section 21099 described in Section 2.3.2.2, Transit Priority Areas, impacts to aesthetics shall not be considered significant environmental impacts for projects that: are located within a TPA; are residential, mixed-use residential, or employment center projects; and are located on an infill site. As shown on Figure 5, all of the housing opportunity sites proposed for redesignation and rezoning are in a TPA; thus, future qualifying developments in the TPAs would be exempt from an aesthetic evaluation under CEQA.

2023- 2031 HOUSING ELEMEN T , ZONING, AND SULLIVAN CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS :

ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE DALY CITY GENERAL PLAN UPDATE EIR

CITY OF DALY CITY

3. Environmental Analysis

3.2 AIR QUALITY
Would the proposed Modified Project:

Level of
Impact in
Certified EIR
Impacts of the Modified Project Compared to Certified EIR:

Same or
Reduced
Impact?
New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New
or
More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
a) Conflict with or obstruct
implementation of the applicable air
quality plan?
NI Yes No No No
b) Result in a cumulatively considerable
net increase of any criteria pollutant
for which the project region is non-
attainment under an applicable
federal or state ambient air quality
standard?
LTS Yes No No No
c) Expose sensitive receptors to
substantial pollutant concentrations?
LTS Yes No No No
d) Result in other emissions (such as
those leading to odors) adversely
affecting a substantial number of
people?
LTS Yes No No No
Key: NI = no impact; LTS = less than significant; LTS/M = less than significant with mitigation; SU = significant and unavoidable Discussion:

The Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) is responsible for developing the Clean Air Plan for the San Francisco Bay Area.8 The Certified EIR found that the Approved Project was consistent with the goals and control measures of the Clean Air Plan, would not significantly contribute to the increase of traffic that would exacerbate air quality problems, adequately addressed toxic air contaminant sources and sensitive receptors, and would not expose substantial numbers of people to objectionable odors.

Types of land uses that typically generate substantial pollutant concentrations include industrial and manufacturing (stationary sources) and warehousing land uses. While public facilities and commercial uses that generate small- and medium-sized truck trips for deliveries could similarly generate localized substantial pollutant concentrations, the proposed Modified Project would not increase the amount of public facilities and commercial land use greater than what was analyzed in the Certified EIR. In fact, there would be a reduction of public facilities and commercial land use, further decreasing pollutants generated from non-residential land uses. Though mobile source emissions would generate the majority of criteria air pollutants and the proposed Modified Project would increase trips from residential land uses, it would

8 Bay Area Air Quality Management District, April 2017, 2017 Clean Air Plan: Spare the Air, Cool the Climate, https://www.baaqmd.gov/~/media/files/planning-and-research/plans/2017-clean-air-plan/attachment-a_-proposed-final-cap- vol-1-pdf.pdf?la=en.

2023- 2031 HOUSING ELEMENT , ZONING, AND SULLIVAN CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS :

ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE DALY CITY GENERAL PLAN UPDATE EIR

CITY OF DALY CITY

3. Environmental Analysis
August 2024 Page 27
result in reduced emissions from truck trips when compared to the Approved Project. Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would provide additional opportunity sites for future infill, high-density residential developments to meet RHNA requirements but would not have the potential to substantially affect housing, employment, and population projections in the Bay Area, which is the basis of the Clean Air Plan projections. The proposed Modified Project would therefore not result in a new impact or substantial increase in magnitude of the existing impacts related to conflicting with or obstructing implementation of the applicable air quality plan.

The proposed Modified Project would result in amendments to the land use designations and zoning districts to facilitate additional locations for future residential development that could generate 1,474 net new units and reduce potential for non-residential uses (e.g., public facilities and commercial uses).

Accordingly, long-term operational emissions associated with non-residential uses would be reduced under the proposed Modified Project. Therefore, no new significant impact or substantially more severe significant impacts than those identified in the Certified EIR would occur with implementation of the proposed Modified Project. The Certified EIR determined that the construction emissions of the Approved Project would be less than significant with implementation of the Daly City General Plan policies, which identify compliance with BAAQMD best management practices and regulations required to reduce fugitive dust and manage hazardous materials during construction. Potential future development under the proposed Modified Project would be required to comply with the same policies and regulations listed in the Certified EIR, which would contribute to further reduction of GHG emissions and potential health risk to people. Therefore, the proposed Modified Project would not result in a new impact or substantial increase in magnitude of the existing impacts related to cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutants.

Neither the Approved Project nor the proposed Modified Project would involve the type of development that would generate substantial odors or be subject to odors that would affect a substantial number of people. The type of facilities that are considered to have objectionable odors from their operation include wastewater treatments plants, compost facilities, landfills, solid waste transfer stations, fiberglass manufacturing facilities, paint/coating operations (e.g., auto body shops), dairy farms, petroleum refineries, asphalt batch plants, chemical manufacturing, and food manufacturing facilities. The proposed changes to land use designations and zoning districts would result in opportunities for residential development that are not associated with foul odors that constitute a public nuisance.

Overall, the proposed Modified Project would not result in a new impact or a substantial increase in magnitude of the existing air quality impacts that were analyzed in the Certified EIR.

2023- 2031 HOUSING ELEMEN T , ZONING, AND SULLIVAN CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS :

ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE DALY CITY GENERAL PLAN UPDATE EIR

CITY OF DALY CITY

3. Environmental Analysis

3.3 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Would the proposed Modified Project:

Level of
Impact in
Certified EIR
Impacts of the Modified Project Compared to Certified EIR:

Same or
Reduced
Impact?
New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New
or
More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
a) Have a substantial adverse effect,
either directly or through habitat
modifications, on any species
identified as a candidate, sensitive, or
special status species in local or
regional plans, policies, or
regulations, or by the California
Department of Fish and Game or U.S.

Fish and Wildlife Service?
LTS Yes No No No
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on
any riparian habitat or other sensitive
natural community identified in local
or regional plans, policies, regulations
or by the California Department of
Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service?
NI Yes No No No
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on
federally protected wetlands
(including, but not limited to, marsh,
vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through
direct removal, filling, hydrological
interruption, or other means?
NI Yes No No No
d) Interfere substantially with the
movement of any native resident or
migratory fish or wildlife species or
with established native resident or
migratory wildlife corridors, or
impede the use of native wildlife
nursery sites?
LTS Yes No No No
e) Conflict with any local policies or
ordinances protecting biological
resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or ordinance?
NI Yes No No No
f) Conflict with the provisions of an
adopted Habitat Conservation Plan,
Natural Community Conservation
Plan, or other approved local,
regional, or state habitat
conservation plan?
LTS Yes No No No
Key: NI = no impact; LTS = less than significant; LTS/M = less than significant with mitigation; SU = significant and unavoidable

2023- 2031 HOUSING ELEMENT , ZONING, AND SULLIVAN CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS :

ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE DALY CITY GENERAL PLAN UPDATE EIR

CITY OF DALY CITY

3. Environmental Analysis
August 2024 Page 29
Discussion:

The Certified EIR concluded that the Approved Project would not have a significant adverse effect on special-status species, would not interfere with wildlife species movement, and would not conflict with the provision of the San Bruno Mountain Habitat Conservation Plan. The proposed Modified Project would not change the Certified EIR study area boundaries and would not change the size or extent of disturbed areas that were analyzed in the Certified EIR. The housing opportunity sites proposed for redesignation and rezoning under the proposed Modified Project are already developed and in close proximity to existing residential and residential-serving development. Thus, the proposed Modified Project would not impact sensitive wildlife or habitat areas. As with the Approved Project, no biological resources would be severely impacted, and the proposed Modified Project would not result in a new impact or a substantial increase in magnitude of the existing impacts that were analyzed in the Certified EIR with respect to biological resources.

3.4 CULTURAL AND TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES
Would the proposed Modified Project:

Level of
Impact in
Certified EIR
Impacts of the Modified Project Compared to Certified EIR:

Same or
Reduced
Impact?
New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New
or
More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
a) Cause a substantial adverse change
in the significance of a historical
resource as defined in Section
15064.5?
LTS Yes No No No
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in
the significance of an archaeological
resource pursuant to Section
15064.5?
LTS Yes No No No
c) Disturb any human remains, including
those interred outside of formal
cemeteries?
LTS Yes No No No
d) Cause a substantial adverse change in
the significance of a Tribal Cultural
Resource, defined in Public Resources
Code Section 21074 as either a site,
feature, place, cultural landscape that
is geographically defined in terms of
the size and scope of the landscape,
sacred place, or object with cultural
value to a California Native American
Tribe, and that is:
i) Listed or eligible for listing in the
California Register of Historical
Resources, or in a local register
of historical resources as defined
2018
Checklist
Question
N/A No No No

2023- 2031 HOUSING ELEMEN T , ZONING, AND SULLIVAN CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS :

ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE DALY CITY GENERAL PLAN UPDATE EIR

CITY OF DALY CITY

3. Environmental Analysis

Would the proposed Modified Project:

Level of
Impact in
Certified EIR
Impacts of the Modified Project Compared to Certified EIR:

Same or
Reduced
Impact?
New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New
or
More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
in Public Resources Code Section
5020.1(k), or
ii) A resource determined by the
lead agency, in its discretion and
supported by substantial
evidence, to be significant
pursuant to criteria set forth in
subdivision (c) of Public
Resource Code Section 5024.1.

In applying the criteria set forth
in subdivision (c) of the Public
Resource Code Section 5024.1
for the purposes of this
paragraph, the lead agency shall
consider the significance to a
California Native American tribe.

Key: NI = no impact; LTS = less than significant; LTS/M = less than significant with mitigation; SU = significant and unavoidable Discussion:

The Certified EIR concluded that the Approved Project would not significantly adversely affect historic resources, undiscovered archaeological resources (including those of Native Americans), or human remains. The Certified EIR did not include an evaluation of impacts to tribal cultural resources pursuant to criterion (d) because this criterion was not introduced to the CEQA Guidelines Appendix G, Environmental Checklist, until 2017, and therefore not required by CEQA at that time. According to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, changes in law, regulation, or guidelines adoption are not “new information” if the information about the issue (i.e., tribal cultural resources) was known or should have been known at the time the original EIR was certified. Concerned Dublin Citizens v City of Dublin (2013) 214 CA4th 1301, 1320; Fort Mojave Indian Tribe v Department of Health Servs. (1995) 38 CA4th 1574, 1605. Information about tribal cultural resources was known when the Daly City General Plan Update EIR was certified in 2013. SB 18 was passed in 2004. SB 18 requires local governments to contact and consult with California Native American tribes prior to amendment or adoption of a General Plan, Specific Plan, or designation of Open Space. In addition, Governor Brown’s Executive Order B-10-11 (2011), established the Governor’s Tribal Advisor and established administration policy to encourage State agencies to communicate and consult with California Native American tribes.

There are no known tribal cultural resources in the Study Area, and none were identified as part of the outreach to Native American tribes conducted for the proposed Modified Project. Pursuant to California

2023- 2031 HOUSING ELEMENT , ZONING, AND SULLIVAN CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS :

ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE DALY CITY GENERAL PLAN UPDATE EIR

CITY OF DALY CITY

3. Environmental Analysis
August 2024 Page 31
Government Code Section 65352.3-5 (SB 18), the City requested a list of local Native American representatives as potentially having local knowledge from the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) in August 2023. The NAHC responded and provided contact information for 11 Native American tribal representatives, which are listed below. The City submitted letters in September 2023 to provide an opportunity for the listed Native American tribes to participate in local land use decisions at an early planning stage, for the purpose of protecting or mitigating impacts to cultural places.  Irene Zwierlein, Chairperson of the Amah Mutsun Tribal Band of Mission San Juan Bautista  Carla Munoz, Member of the tribal council of the Costanoan Rumsen Carmel Tribe  Desiree Munoz, Tribal Liaison for the Costanoan Rumsen Carmel Tribe  Ann Marie Sayers, Chairperson of the Indian Canyon Mutsun Band of Costanoan  Kanyon Sayers-Roods, Most Likely Descendent (MLD) of the Indian Canyon Mutsun Band of Costanoan  Charlene Nijmeh, Chairperson of the Muwekma Ohlone Indian Tribe of the SF Bay Area  Monica Arellano, Vice Chairwoman of the Muwekma Ohlone Indian Tribe of the SF Bay Area  Andrew Galvan, Chairperson of the Ohlone Indian Tribe  Desiree Vigil, Tribal Historic Preservation Officer for the Ohlone Indian Tribe  Vincent Medina, Tribal Consultant for the Ohlone Indian Tribe  Kenneth Woodrow, Chairperson of the Wuksachi Indian Tribe/Eshom Valley Band No responses were received at the time of the publication of this Addendum. The City remains open to consultation with tribal representatives. In addition, the City requested a Sacred Lands File search, which was completed by NAHC Cultural Resources Analyst, Cody Champagne, on August 29, 2023, with negative results.

The proposed Modified Project would introduce policy-level revisions that would not modify the location of overall ground-disturbing activities that could occur as a result of potential future developments. The housing opportunity sites proposed for redesignation and rezoning under the proposed Modified Project are already developed and in close proximity to existing residential and residential-serving development.

Thus, the proposed Modified Project would not adversely impact historical or tribal and non-tribal archaeological resources, as well as tribal and non-tribal human remains beyond what was evaluated in the Certified EIR. The proposed Modified Project does not affect areas outside of what was analyzed in the Certified EIR, and potential future development would still be required to follow all applicable regulations pertaining to cultural resources as under the Approved Project. For example, potential future development would be required to comply with regulations for potential cultural resources or human remains that are found on-site during development, such as PRC Section 5097.98 and California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, among others. Furthermore, potential future development would be required to follow applicable State and local regulations pertaining to discovery of potential tribal cultural resources. Such regulations include the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act and the California Health and Safety Code Sections 7050 and 7052, and regulations requiring consultation with tribes as necessary.

2023- 2031 HOUSING ELEMEN T , ZONING, AND SULLIVAN CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS :

ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE DALY CITY GENERAL PLAN UPDATE EIR

CITY OF DALY CITY

3. Environmental Analysis

Since the proposed Modified Project does not include specific development proposals or impact areas outside those included in the Certified EIR, the proposed Modified Project would not result in a new impact or a substantial increase in magnitude of the existing impacts that were analyzed in the Certified EIR with respect to cultural and tribal cultural resources.

3.5 ENERGY
Would the proposed Modified Project:

Level of
Impact in
Certified
EIR
Impacts of the Modified Project Compared to Certified EIR:

Same or
Reduced
Impact?
New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New
or
More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
a) Result in potentially significant
environmental impact due to wasteful,
inefficient, or unnecessary consumption
of energy resources, during project
construction or operation?
LTS Yes No No No
b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local
plan for renewable energy or energy
efficiency?
2018
Checklist
Question
N/A No No No
Key: NI = no impact; LTS = less than significant; LTS/M = less than significant with mitigation; SU = significant and unavoidable Discussion:

Chapter 3.6, Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Energy, of the Certified EIR, addressed the impacts to energy associated with buildout of the Approved Project. The Certified EIR identified that there would be a slight reduction in energy use per service population, indicating that the impact of the Approved Project on energy use was less than significant and that the Approved Project would not result in wasteful, inefficient, and unnecessary consumption of energy. This section also addresses an additional question regarding conflict with or obstruction of State or local plans for renewable energy or energy efficiency impacts pursuant to the updated CEQA Guidelines that were adopted by the California Natural Resources Agency in December 2018. As stated in Section 3.4, Cultural and Tribal Cultural Resources, changes in law, regulation, or guidelines adoption are not “new information” if the information about the issue (i.e., energy) was known or should have been known at the time the original EIR was certified. As evidenced in the Certified EIR conclusions regarding energy impacts, information about energy was known when the Daly City General Plan Update EIR was certified in 2013.

Potential future development under the proposed Modified Project would be required to comply with existing energy-related plans, policies, or regulations to avoid wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources during project construction or operation, and to avoid conflict with State or local plans for renewable energy or energy efficiency. Furthermore, as shown on Figure 5, some of the housing opportunity sites proposed for redesignation and rezoning under the proposed Modified

2023- 2031 HOUSING ELEMENT , ZONING, AND SULLIVAN CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS :

ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE DALY CITY GENERAL PLAN UPDATE EIR

CITY OF DALY CITY

3. Environmental Analysis
August 2024 Page 33
Project are within a PDA, and all of these housing opportunity sites are within a TPA and in close proximity to existing residential and residential-serving development, thus contributing to reduced energy use from the transportation sector . As described in Section 2.3.2, Plan Bay Area, Plan Bay Area lays out a development scenario for the region, which, when integrated with the transportation network and other transportation measures and policies, would reduce GHG emissions from transportation VMT (excluding goods movement) beyond the per-capita reduction targets identified by the California Air Resources Board. As part of the implementing framework for Plan Bay Area, PDAs and TPAs are identified as areas where concentrated development can have beneficial environmental effects and reduce adverse environmental impacts, such as wasteful and inefficient uses of energy. Placing residential and nonresidential uses near each other to create self-sustaining communities and neighborhoods and offering mixed-used developments would result in shorter distances traveled between where people work and live and amenities. The shorter distances reduce energy use by reducing the average vehicle trip distance traveled. The residential densification of land uses also encourages people to forego vehicle travel altogether and either bike, walk, or take public transportation, which would also contribute to minimizing VMT and energy usage. In addition, like the Approved Project, potential future development under the proposed Modified Project would be required to comply with existing policies, plans, and regulations pertaining to energy efficiency, such as the Building and Energy Efficiency Standards of the PRC.

Therefore, as with the Approved Project, the proposed Modified Project would not result in wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources during project construction or operation, or conflict with or obstruct a State or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency. Accordingly, the proposed Modified Project would not result in a new impact or a substantial increase in magnitude of the existing energy-related impacts; rather, it would likely decrease energy usage and impacts compared to what was analyzed in the Certified EIR.

2023- 2031 HOUSING ELEMEN T , ZONING, AND SULLIVAN CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS :

ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE DALY CITY GENERAL PLAN UPDATE EIR

CITY OF DALY CITY

3. Environmental Analysis

3.6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS
Would the proposed Modified Project:

Level of
Impact in
Certified EIR
Impacts of the Modified Project Compared to Certified EIR:

Same or
Reduced
Impact?
New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New
or
More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
a) Directly or indirectly cause potential
substantial adverse effects, including
the risk of loss, injury, or death
involving:

i) Rupture of a known earthquake
fault, as delineated on the most
recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake
Fault Zoning Map, issued by the
State Geologist for the area or
based on other substantial
evidence of a known fault? Refer
to Division of Mines and Geology
Special Publication 42.

LTS Yes No No No
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? LTS Yes No No No
iii) Seismic-related ground failure,
including liquefaction? LTS Yes No No No
iv) Landslides? LTS Yes No No No
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the
loss of topsoil? LTS Yes No No No
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil
that is unstable, or that would become
unstable as a result of the project, and
potentially result in on- or off-site
landslide, lateral spreading,
subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
LTS Yes No No No
d) Be located on expansive soil, as
defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform
Building Code (1994), creating
substantial risks to life or property?
LTS Yes No No No
e) Have soils incapable of adequately
supporting the use of septic tanks or
alternative wastewater disposal
systems where sewers are not
available for the disposal of
wastewater?
NI Yes No No No
f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique
paleontological resource or site or
unique geologic feature?
LTS Yes No No No
Key: NI = no impact; LTS = less than significant; LTS/M = less than significant with mitigation; SU = significant and unavoidable

2023- 2031 HOUSING ELEMENT , ZONING, AND SULLIVAN CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS :

ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE DALY CITY GENERAL PLAN UPDATE EIR

CITY OF DALY CITY

3. Environmental Analysis
August 2024 Page 35
Discussion:

The Certified EIR concluded that the Approved Project would not expose people or structures to significantly adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving rupture of a known fault, strong seismic ground shaking, landslides, or lateral spreading. Potential future development under the Approved Project was found to not be significantly impacted by unstable geologic unit or soil or expansive soils. The Approved Project was found to not result in significant adverse effects to paleontological resources.

The proposed Modified Project would introduce policy-level revisions that would not change the location of overall ground-disturbing activities that could occur as a result of potential future development. The housing opportunity sites proposed for redesignation and rezoning under the proposed Modified Project are already developed and in close proximity to existing residential and residential-serving development.

Thus, potential future development under the proposed Modified Project would connect to existing wastewater infrastructure and the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems would not be required. In addition, like the Approved Project, potential future development under the proposed Modified Project would be required to comply with State and local regulations to minimize geology and soil-related hazards. Therefore, the proposed Modified Project would not result in a new impact or a substantial increase in magnitude of the existing impacts that were analyzed in the Certified EIR related to geology and soils.

3.7 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
Would the proposed Modified Project:

Level of
Impact in
Certified EIR
Impacts of the Modified Project Compared to Certified EIR:

Same or
Reduced
Impact?
New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New
or
More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions,
either directly or indirectly, that may
have a significant impact on the
environment?
LTS Yes No No No
b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy,
or regulation adopted for the purpose
of reducing the emissions of
greenhouse gases?
NI Yes No No No
Key: NI = no impact; LTS = less than significant; LTS/M = less than significant with mitigation; SU = significant and unavoidable

2023- 2031 HOUSING ELEMEN T , ZONING, AND SULLIVAN CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS :

ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE DALY CITY GENERAL PLAN UPDATE EIR

CITY OF DALY CITY

3. Environmental Analysis

Discussion:

The Certified EIR found that the Approved Project would not conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions. The proposed Modified Project would introduce policy-level revisions that would not affect GHG emissions directly, but potential future development under the proposed Modified Project would generate GHG emissions from construction, vehicle trips generated by future development (e.g., residents), energy use (indirectly from purchased electricity use, and directly through fuel consumed for building heating), area sources (e.g., landscaping equipment used on-site, consumer products, coatings), water/wastewater generation, and waste disposal.

Though the proposed Modified Project would exceed the buildout capacity evaluated in the Certified EIR, it would replace non-residential uses with residential uses, which would decrease GHG emissions.

Furthermore, as shown on Figure 5, some of the housing opportunity sites proposed for redesignation and rezoning under the proposed Modified Project are within PDAs, and all of these housing opportunity sites are within TPAs and are in close proximity to existing residential and residential-serving development, thus contributing to reduced GHG emissions from the transportation sector . As described in Section 3.5, Energy, the proposed Modified Project is consistent with Plan Bay Area and lays out a development scenario for the region, which, when integrated with the transportation network and other transportation measures and policies, would reduce GHG emissions from transportation VMT (excluding goods movement) beyond the per-capita reduction targets identified by the California Air Resources Board.

Placing residential and non-residential uses near each other to create self-sustaining communities and neighborhoods and offering mixed-used developments would result in shorter distances traveled between where people work and live and amenities. The shorter distances reduce energy use by reducing the average vehicle trip distance traveled. The residential densification of land uses also encourages people to forego vehicle travel altogether and either bike, walk, or take public transportation, which would further contribute to minimizing VMT and GHG emissions from transportation. Therefore, the proposed Modified Project would not result in substantially greater impacts to GHG and potential future development would likely decrease GHG emissions.

Additionally, the proposed Modified Project would not conflict with plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions. Accordingly, the proposed Modified Project would not result in a new impact or a substantial increase in magnitude of the existing GHG-related impacts that was analyzed in the Certified EIR.

2023- 2031 HOUSING ELEMENT , ZONING, AND SULLIVAN CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS :

ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE DALY CITY GENERAL PLAN UPDATE EIR

CITY OF DALY CITY

3. Environmental Analysis
August 2024 Page 37

3.8 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Would the proposed Modified Project:

Level of
Impact in
Certified EIR
Impacts of the Modified Project Compared to Certified EIR:

Same or
Reduced
Impact?
New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New
or
More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
a) Create a significant hazard to the
public or the environment through the
routine transport, use, or disposal of
hazardous materials?
LTS Yes No No No
b) Create a significant hazard to the
public or the environment through
reasonably foreseeable upset and
accident conditions involving the
release of hazardous materials into
the environment?
LTS Yes No No No
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle
hazardous or acutely hazardous
materials, substances, or waste within
one-quarter mile of an existing or
proposed school?
LTS Yes No No No
d) Be located on a site which is included
on a list of hazardous materials sites
compiled pursuant to Government
Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result,
would it create a significant hazard to
the public or the environment?
LTS Yes No No No
e) For a project located within an airport
land use plan or, where such a plan
has not been adopted, within two
miles of a public airport or public use
airport, would the project result in a
safety hazard for people residing or
working in the project area?
NI Yes No No No
f) Impair implementation of or physically
interfere with an adopted emergency
response plan or emergency
evacuation plan?
NI Yes No No No
g) Expose people or structures to a
significant risk of loss, injury or death
involving wildland fires, including
where wildlands are adjacent to
urbanized areas or where residences
are intermixed with wildlands?
LTS Yes No No No
Key: NI = no impact; LTS = less than significant; LTS/M = less than significant with mitigation; SU = significant and unavoidable

2023- 2031 HOUSING ELEMEN T , ZONING, AND SULLIVAN CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS :

ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE DALY CITY GENERAL PLAN UPDATE EIR

CITY OF DALY CITY

3. Environmental Analysis

Discussion:

The Certified EIR concluded that the Approved Project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment, including through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials or significant hazardous emissions or involve significant handling of hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 0.25 miles of an existing or proposed school. The Approved Project was found to have the potential to allow development on a site included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5, but compliance with federal, State, and regional regulations would ensure no significant impacts. Furthermore, the Approved Project would not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands. As discussed in Chapter 3.9, Land Use and Housing, of the Certified EIR, there are no conflicts with airport height restrictions established by the 2012 San Francisco International Airport Comprehensive Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (SFO ALUCP), and the city does not lie within any airport safety compatibility zones.

The proposed Modified Project would result in amendments to the land use designations and zoning districts to facilitate additional locations for future residential development that could generate 1,474 net new units and reduce potential for non-residential uses (e.g., public facilities and commercial uses).

Therefore, the proposed Modified Project would not have the potential to result in a new or greater impacts related to hazards or hazardous materials from those evaluated in the Certified EIR because residential land uses use less hazardous materials than public facilities and commercial uses, and they do not store substantial quantities of hazardous materials.

Some of the housing opportunity sites proposed for redesignation and rezoning under the proposed Modified Project are within the SFO Airport Influence Area B. Pursuant to the 2012 SFO ALUCP , the height of critical aeronautical surfaces for Daly City is greater than 150 feet above ground level. Under the proposed Modified Project, maximum height allowances in place for residential zones in Daly City would not change. Furthermore, pursuant to CEQA Section 21676.5(a), the City is required to submit the proposed Modified Project to the City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County Board of Directors in its designated role as the Airport Land Use Commission for review.

Like the Approved Project, potential future development allowed under the proposed Modified Project would be required to comply with State and local regulations related to minimizing the effects of hazards and the release of hazardous materials and would be required to be consistent with the goals and policies of the 2012 SFO ALUCP. Therefore, the proposed Modified Project would not result in a new impact or a substantial increase in magnitude of the existing impacts analyzed in the Certified EIR with respect to hazards and hazardous materials.

2023- 2031 HOUSING ELEMENT , ZONING, AND SULLIVAN CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS :

ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE DALY CITY GENERAL PLAN UPDATE EIR

CITY OF DALY CITY

3. Environmental Analysis
August 2024 Page 39

3.9 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY
Would the proposed Modified Project:

Level of
Impact in
Certified
EIR
Impacts of the Modified Project Compared to Certified EIR:

Same or
Reduced
Impact?
New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New
or
More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
a) Violate any water quality standards or
waste discharge requirements? LTS Yes No No No
b) Substantially decrease groundwater
supplies or interfere substantially with
groundwater recharge such that the
project may impede sustainable
groundwater management of the basin?
LTS Yes No No No
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage
pattern of the site or area, including
through the alteration of the course of a
stream or river or through the addition
of impervious surfaces, in a manner
which would:
i) result in substantial erosion or
siltation on- or off-site;
ii) substantially increase the rate or
amount of surface runoff in a manner
which would result in flooding on- or
of-site;
iii) create or contribute runoff water
which would exceed the capacity of
existing or planned stormwater
drainage systems or provide
substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff; or
iv) impede or redirect flood flows?
LTS Yes No No No
d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche
zones, risk release of pollutants due to
project inundation?
LTS Yes No No No
e) Conflict with or obstruct
implementation of a water quality
control plan or sustainable groundwater
management plan?
2018
Checklist
Question
N/A No No No
Key: NI = no impact; LTS = less than significant; LTS/M = less than significant with mitigation; SU = significant and unavoidable Discussion:

The Certified EIR concluded that future development under the Approved Project would not significantly violate water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise significantly degrade water quality; would not deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level;

2023- 2031 HOUSING ELEMEN T , ZONING, AND SULLIVAN CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS :

ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE DALY CITY GENERAL PLAN UPDATE EIR

CITY OF DALY CITY

3. Environmental Analysis

and would not alter existing drainage patterns of the area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner that would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. Future development under the Approved Project was also found to not expose people to significant risk of flooding or tsunami inundation.

According to the Daly City 2020 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP), in January 2016, the cities of Daly City and San Bruno and the California Water Service Company entered into a joint funding agreement to develop a Groundwater Sustainability Plan (GSP) for the South Westside Basin.9 However, no GSP has been finalized as of the release of this Addendum. The GSP will supersede the 2012 South Westside Basin Groundwater Management Plan. The City, along with the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission, the City of San Bruno, and California Water Service Company, have signed an agreement to limit pumping from the South Westside Basin to no more than 6.90 million gallons per day (mgd), of which Daly City is allocated an average rate of 3.43 mgd. However, the City has not pumped any groundwater over the past five years so that the basin can recharge.

The proposed Modified Project would result in amendments to the land use designations and zoning districts to facilitate additional locations for future residential development that could generate 1,474 net new units and replace non-residential uses (e.g., public facilities and commercial uses). Although residential development would generate more water demand than public facilities and commercial uses, the City has not pumped any groundwater in the past five years, and with the publication of the GSP , the City and other water purveyors in the groundwater basin that pump groundwater would meet the GSP sustainability goals and not create overdraft conditions. Therefore, the proposed Modified Project would not substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere with groundwater recharge such that it would impede sustainable groundwater management of the South Westside Basin.

Potential future development under the proposed Modified Project would occur in areas already covered with impervious surfaces, and no additional runoff potential would occur . Like the Approved Project, potential future development under the proposed Modified Project would be required to comply with State and local regulations related to minimizing the effects of water pollutants and hazards associated with hydrology and flooding. Accordingly, the proposed Modified Project would not result in development that could have a potential adverse impact on the hydrology and water quality of the project area, including the obstruction of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan.

Therefore, the proposed Modified Project would not result in a new impact or a substantial increase in magnitude of the existing hydrology and water quality impacts analyzed in the Certified EIR.

9 Daly City, May 2021, 2020 Urban Water Management Plan, https://www.dalycity.org/DocumentCenter/View/4834/DRAFT- 2020-Urban-Water-Management-Plan?bidId=, accessed August 23, 2023.

2023- 2031 HOUSING ELEMENT , ZONING, AND SULLIVAN CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS :

ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE DALY CITY GENERAL PLAN UPDATE EIR

CITY OF DALY CITY

3. Environmental Analysis
August 2024 Page 41

3.10 LAND USE AND PLANNING
Would the proposed Modified Project:

Level of
Impact in
Certified
EIR
Impacts of the Modified Project Compared to Certified EIR:

Same or
Reduced
Impact?
New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New
or
More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
a) Physically divide an established
community? LTS Yes No No No
b) Cause a significant environmental
impact due to a conflict with any land
use plan, policy, or regulation
adopted for the purpose of avoiding
or mitigating an environmental
effect?
LTS Yes No No No
Key: NI = no impact; LTS = less than significant; LTS/M = less than significant with mitigation; SU = significant and unavoidable Discussion:

The Certified EIR concluded that the Approved Project would not make substantial changes to the types of land uses in an area that may physically divide an established community and would not conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. The proposed Modified Project would introduce policy-level revisions and would not involve any structures, land use designations, or other features (e.g., freeways, railroad tracks) that would physically divide an established community. The type of anticipated development associated with the proposed Modified Project would be restricted to the existing urbanized environment. In addition, like the Approved Project, all other applicable regulations and Daly City General Plan policies pertaining to land use and planning would still apply.

The Daly City General Plan is the primary planning document for the city of Daly City. The proposed Modified Project is intended to fulfill RHNA requirements through the 2023-2031 Housing Element, and ensure consistency between the General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and State law. In addition, as discussed in Section 2.4.2, Amendments to Zoning, the proposed Modified Project would include a new chapter of the Daly City Municipal Code that would further ensure consistency and compliance with the SFO ALUCP by including requirements for the evaluation of potential airport noise impacts within the SFO ALUCP Community Noise Equivalent Level 65 dB contour line, the provision of avigation easements for conditionally compatible land uses, and the codification of maximum building heights per Federal Aviation Administration regulations and Critical Aeronautical Surfaces identified in the SFO ALUCP . The proposed Modified Project would not result in a new impact or a substantial increase in magnitude of the existing land use and planning impacts analyzed in the Certified EIR.

2023- 2031 HOUSING ELEMEN T , ZONING, AND SULLIVAN CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS :

ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE DALY CITY GENERAL PLAN UPDATE EIR

CITY OF DALY CITY

3. Environmental Analysis

3.11 NOISE
Would the proposed Modified Project:

Level of
Impact in
Certified
EIR
Impacts of the Modified Project Compared to Certified EIR:

Same or
Reduced
Impact?
New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New
or
More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
a) Result in the generation of a substantial
temporary or permanent increase in
ambient noise levels in the vicinity of
the project in excess of standards
established in the local general plan or
noise ordinance, or applicable standards
of other agencies?
SU Yes No No No
b) Result in the generation of excessive
groundborne vibration or groundborne
noise levels?
LTS Yes No No No
c) For a project located within the vicinity
of a private airstrip or an airport land
use plan or, where such a plan has not
been adopted, within two miles of a
public airport or public use airport,
would the project expose people
residing or working in the project area
to excessive noise levels?
LTS Yes No No No
Key: NI = no impact; LTS = less than significant; LTS/M = less than significant with mitigation; SU = significant and unavoidable Discussion:

The Certified EIR found that while the Approved Project would result in a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the city vicinity above acceptable noise levels, which would result in a significant and unavoidable impact to existing and anticipated sensitive receptors. However, the Approved Project would not result in the exposure of persons to, or generation of, significantly excessive ground-borne vibration, ground-borne noise levels, or levels of noise from BART train operations. The Approved Project would also not result in the exposure of persons to excessively significant airport noise levels.

Construction noise of potential future developments under the proposed Modified Project would be similar to the impacts described in the Certified EIR. Construction of residential developments would generally include the same types of construction equipment; therefore, the magnitude of noise levels generated would be similar . As discussed in Section 3.2, Air Quality, the proposed Modified Project would result in more residential trips and fewer non-residential trips. Accordingly, noise would not be greater under the proposed Modified Project since public facilities and commercial use trips come from light- and heavy-duty trucks, which generate more noise. Operational stationary noise, such as from heating, ventilation, and air conditioning units, and recreational activities at outdoor common uses areas from potential future developments under the proposed Modified Project would also be similar to the impacts

2023- 2031 HOUSING ELEMENT , ZONING, AND SULLIVAN CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS :

ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE DALY CITY GENERAL PLAN UPDATE EIR

CITY OF DALY CITY

3. Environmental Analysis
August 2024 Page 43
described in the Certified EIR. As shown on Figure 5, some of the housing opportunity sites proposed for redesignation and rezoning under the proposed Modified Project are in PDAs and all of these housing opportunity sites are in TPAs and in close proximity to existing residential, residential-serving development, and transportation. The residential densification of land uses encourages people to forego vehicle travel altogether and bike, walk, or take public transportation, which would further reduce traffic noise. Thus, transportation noise has the potential to be reduced from that of the Approved Project.

The proposed Modified Project would not affect the existing policies and regulations pertaining to noise, including the Daly City General Plan policies, mitigation measures from the Certified EIR, and standards from the City’s noise-control ordinance, and potential future development under the proposed Modified Project would also be subject to these regulations. In addition, as discussed in Section 2.4.2, Amendments to Zoning, the proposed Modified Project would include a new chapter to the Daly City Municipal Code that would further ensure consistency and compliance with the noise standards set forth in the SFO ALUCP by requiring the evaluation of potential airport noise impacts within the Community Noise Equivalent Level 65 dB contour line of the SFO ALUCP. Therefore, the proposed Modified Project would not result in a new impact or a substantial increase in magnitude of the existing noise impacts analyzed in the Certified EIR.

3.12 POPULATION AND HOUSING
Would the proposed Modified Project:

Level of
Impact in
Certified EIR
Impacts of the Modified Project Compared to Certified EIR:

Same or
Reduced
Impact?
New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New
or
More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
a) Induce substantial unplanned
population growth in an area, either
directly (for example, by proposing
new homes and businesses) or
indirectly (for example, through
extension of roads or other
infrastructure)?
LTS Yes No No No
b) Displace substantial numbers of
existing people or housing,
necessitating the construction of
replacement housing elsewhere?
LTS Yes No No No
Key: NI = no impact; LTS = less than significant; LTS/M = less than significant with mitigation; SU = significant and unavoidable

2023- 2031 HOUSING ELEMEN T , ZONING, AND SULLIVAN CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS :

ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE DALY CITY GENERAL PLAN UPDATE EIR

CITY OF DALY CITY

3. Environmental Analysis

Discussion:

The Certified EIR concluded that the Approved Project would not displace substantial numbers of existing housing, population, or jobs. The proposed Modified Project would increase the potential buildout capacity beyond what was evaluated in the Certified EIR and result in a net new population of 4,621 to meet RHNA requirements for Daly City. However, the purpose of the RHNA is to plan for housing needs, and it is allocated using a formula that considers population size for each city and county in the region.

The proposed Modified Project would result in amendments to the land use designations and zoning districts to facilitate additional locations for future residential development that could generate 1,474 net new units and reduce potential for non-residential uses (e.g., public facilities and commercial uses).

Therefore, the proposed Modified Project would provide housing opportunity sites for the expected population increase in Daly City as required by the regional planning efforts. In addition, the proposed Modified Project proposes redesignation and rezoning for housing opportunity sites that are currently designated and zoned as non-residential uses, so it would not displace existing people or housing or necessitate the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. Accordingly, the proposed Modified Project would not result in a new impact or a substantial increase in magnitude of the existing impacts analyzed in the Certified EIR related to population and housing.

3.13 PUBLIC SERVICES
Would the proposed Modified Project:

Level of
Impact in
Certified EIR
Impacts of the Modified Project Compared to Certified EIR:

Same or
Reduced
Impact?
New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New
or
More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
a) Result in substantial adverse physical
impacts associated with the provision
of new or physically altered
governmental facilities, need for new
or physically altered governmental
facilities, the construction of which
could cause significant environmental
impacts, in order to maintain
acceptable service ratios, response
times or other performance objectives
for any of the public services:

Fire protection services? LTS Yes No No No
Police services? LTS Yes No No No
Schools? LTS Yes No No No
Parks? LTS Yes No No No
Other public facilities? LTS Yes No No No
Key: NI = no impact; LTS = less than significant; LTS/M = less than significant with mitigation; SU = significant and unavoidable

2023- 2031 HOUSING ELEMENT , ZONING, AND SULLIVAN CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS :

ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE DALY CITY GENERAL PLAN UPDATE EIR

CITY OF DALY CITY

3. Environmental Analysis
August 2024 Page 45
Discussion:

The Certified EIR concluded that while the Approved Project would increase the demand for fire and police protection services, promoting infill development along transit corridors would lead to shorter response times and would be located close to existing fire protection services. The Approved Project would not result in increased demand for school facilities beyond existing capacity.

As shown on Figure 5, some of the housing opportunity sites proposed for redesignation and rezoning under the proposed Modified Project are in PDAs, and all of these housing opportunity sites are hin TPAs and in close proximity to existing residential, residential-serving development, and transportation.

Therefore, consistent with the findings of the Certified EIR, the proposed Modified Project would not impact fire protection and police response times. Potential future development under the proposed Modified Project would be located in areas already served by schools and libraries. Parks and other public facilities would also still be available city-wide. Similar to the Approved Project, potential future development under the proposed Modified Project would be required to pay development impact fees and school impact fees and dedicate parkland or pay an in-lieu fee. In summary, the proposed Modified Project would not result in a new impact or a substantial increase in magnitude of the existing impacts analyzed in the Certified EIR related to public services.

3.14 RECREATION
Would the proposed Modified Project:

Level of
Impact in
Certified EIR
Impacts of the Modified Project Compared to Certified EIR:

Same or
Reduced
Impact?
New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New
or
More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
a) Increase the use of existing
neighborhood and regional parks or
other recreational facilities such that
substantial physical deterioration of
the facility would occur or be
accelerated?
LTS Yes No No No
b) Include recreational facilities or
require the construction or expansion
of recreational facilities which might
have an adverse physical effect on the
environment?
LTS Yes No No No
Key: NI = no impact; LTS = less than significant; LTS/M = less than significant with mitigation; SU = significant and unavoidable

2023- 2031 HOUSING ELEMEN T , ZONING, AND SULLIVAN CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS :

ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE DALY CITY GENERAL PLAN UPDATE EIR

CITY OF DALY CITY

3. Environmental Analysis

Discussion:

The Certified EIR concluded that the Approved Project would not result in unmet need for parkland in the city. Potential future development under the proposed Modified Project would be located in areas already served by existing recreational facilities and would not result in accelerated substantial physical deterioration or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities. Similar to the Approved Project, potential future development under the proposed Modified Project would be required to dedicate parkland or pay an in-lieu fee. Accordingly, the proposed Modified Project would not result in a new impact or a substantial increase in magnitude of the existing impacts analyzed in the Certified EIR related to recreation.

3.15 TRANSPORTATION
Would the proposed Modified Project:

Level of
Impact in
Certified EIR
Impacts of the Modified Project Compared to Certified EIR:

Same or
Reduced
Impact?
New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New
or
More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
a) Conflict with a program, plan,
ordinance or policy addressing the
circulation system, including transit,
roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian
facilities?
SU Yes No No No
b) Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA
Guidelines Section 15064.3,
subdivision (b)?
2018
Checklist
Question
N/A No No No
c) Substantially increase hazards due to a
geometric design feature (e.g., sharp
curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm
equipment)?
NI Yes No No No
d) Result in inadequate emergency
access?
NI Yes No No No
Key: NI = no impact; LTS = less than significant; LTS/M = less than significant with mitigation; SU = significant and unavoidable Discussion:

The Certified EIR concluded that the Approved Project would result in a significant and unavoidable impact related to the increase in traffic and exceedance of intersection level of service (LOS) standards.

The Approved Project was found not to result in a significant conflict with San Mateo and San Francisco Congestion Management Program standards or adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities.

2023- 2031 HOUSING ELEMENT , ZONING, AND SULLIVAN CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS :

ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE DALY CITY GENERAL PLAN UPDATE EIR

CITY OF DALY CITY

3. Environmental Analysis
August 2024 Page 47
With the passage of SB 743 (September 2013), which was codified in CEQA Section 21099, and the subsequent adoption of revised CEQA Guidelines (December 2018), LOS can no longer be used as a criterion for identifying significant transportation impacts for most projects under CEQA. LOS is the measure of the average amount of delay experienced by vehicle drivers at an intersection or along a road segment during the most congested time of day. The new CEQA metric (vehicle miles traveled or VMT) measures the total number of daily miles traveled by vehicles on the roadway network and thus the impacts on the environment from those miles traveled. LOS is a measure of local vehicle congestion at an intersection or on a road segment, and VMT is a measure of the total miles of vehicle travel area-wide or at the project level. In other words, SB 743 changed the focus of transportation impact analysis in CEQA from measuring quality-of-life impacts to drivers, to measuring the physical impacts of driving on the environment. VMT criterion (b) was not introduced to the CEQA Guidelines Appendix G, Environmental Checklist, until 2018, and therefore was not required by CEQA prior to that time. As stated in Section 3.4, Cultural and Tribal Cultural Resources, changes in law, regulation, or guidelines adoption are not “new information” if the information about the issue (i.e., VMT) was known or should have been known at the time the original EIR was certified. Information about VMT was known when the Daly City General Plan Update EIR was certified in 2013. Since the certification of the Daly City General Plan Update EIR, the issue of VMT has become a more prominent issue of concern, as evidenced by passage of SB 743 in 2013.

As shown on Figure 5, some of the housing opportunity sites proposed for redesignation and rezoning under the proposed Modified Project are within PDAs, and all of these housing opportunity sites are within TPAs and in close proximity to existing residential and residential-serving development. Pursuant to SB 743, infill residential development in high transit-oriented development areas is not considered the type of project that would generate excessive VMT and result in a significant impact. Infill housing in transit-oriented development areas is anticipated to reduce VMT by putting residents in close proximity to services and transit options, thus reducing trips from vehicles.

Like many other jurisdictions in California, the City of Daly City has not yet adopted a policy or thresholds of significance regarding VMT. Thus, the VMT impacts were assessed based on guidance provided by the OPR in Transportation Impacts (SB 743) CEQA Guidelines Update and Technical Advisory. The OPR guidance indicates that residences within 0.5 miles of an existing major transit stop or an existing stop along a high-quality transit corridor will have a less-than-significant impact on VMT. Most of the housing opportunity sites proposed for redesignation and rezoning are in high-quality transit corridors. A high- quality transit corridor contains fixed-route bus service with headways of no longer than 15 minutes during peak commute hours, as defined in CEQA Section 21155. Therefore, the proposed Modified Project’s changes in land use designations and zoning districts in those areas are expected to have a less- than-significant impact on VMT for residential uses. The other housing opportunity sites proposed for redesignation and rezoning are in dense urban areas near residential-serving development. The residential densification of land uses encourages people to forego vehicle travel altogether and bike, walk, or take public transportation, which would further reduce VMT.

2023- 2031 HOUSING ELEMEN T , ZONING, AND SULLIVAN CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS :

ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE DALY CITY GENERAL PLAN UPDATE EIR

CITY OF DALY CITY

3. Environmental Analysis

In summary, residential land uses would be in or near high-quality transit corridors and residential serving development and would be expected to have a less-than-significant VMT impact. Accordingly, the proposed Modified Project would not cause inconsistency with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(b) regarding VMT. In addition, any potential future development under the proposed Modified Project, like the Approved Project, would be required to comply with the Daly City General Plan policies that serve to minimize transportation impacts from development in Daly City and ensure future projects do not conflict with the City’s standards for its circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities, and no increased hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., a sharp curve or dangerous intersection) would result during the construction and operation phases. Therefore, the proposed Modified Project would not result in a new impact or a substantial increase in magnitude of the existing transportation impacts analyzed in the Certified EIR.

3.16 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
Would the proposed Modified Project:

Level of
Impact in
Certified EIR
Impacts of the Modified Project Compared to Certified EIR:

Same or
Reduced
Impact?
New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New
or
More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
a) Require or result in the construction of
new water facilities or expansion of
existing facilities, the construction of
which would cause significant
environmental effects?
LTS Yes No No No
b) Have sufficient water supplies available
to serve the project and reasonably
foreseeable future development
during normal, dry and multiple dry
years?
LTS Yes No No No
c) Require or result in the construction of
new wastewater treatment facilities or
expansion of existing facilities, the
construction of which would cause
significant environmental effects?
LTS Yes No No No
d) Result in a determination by the
wastewater treatment provider which
serves or may serve the project that it
does not have adequate capacity to
serve the project’s projected demand
in addition to the provider’s existing
commitments?
LTS Yes No No No

2023- 2031 HOUSING ELEMENT , ZONING, AND SULLIVAN CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS :

ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE DALY CITY GENERAL PLAN UPDATE EIR

CITY OF DALY CITY

3. Environmental Analysis
August 2024 Page 49
Would the proposed Modified Project:

Level of
Impact in
Certified EIR
Impacts of the Modified Project Compared to Certified EIR:

Same or
Reduced
Impact?
New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New
or
More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
e) Require or result in the construction of
new stormwater drainage facilities or
expansion of existing facilities, the
construction of which would cause
significant environmental effects?
LTS Yes No No No
f) Generate solid waste in excess of State
or local standards, or in excess of the
capacity of local infrastructure, or
otherwise impair the attainment of
solid waste reduction goals?
LTS Yes No No No
g) Comply with federal, State, and local
statutes and regulations related to
solid waste?
LTS Yes No No No
Key: NI = no impact; LTS = less than significant; LTS/M = less than significant with mitigation; SU = significant and unavoidable Discussion:

The Certified EIR concluded that the Approved Project would not require additional water supply beyond that available from existing entitlements and resources, cause an exceedance of water distribution capacity, exceed wastewater treatment capacity of the wastewater treatment plant, or require the construction of new wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of facilities. The Approved Project was found to be served by a landfill with adequate permitted capacity and would not fail to comply with regulations related to solid waste.

The proposed Modified Project would result in amendments to the land use designations and zoning districts to facilitate additional locations for future residential development that could generate 1,474 net new units and replace non-residential land uses (e.g., public facilities and commercial uses). As cited in the Certified EIR, the 2010 UWMP projections were based on service population (residents and employees) when compared to the General Plan for year 2030 (i.e., 2010 UWMP 192,477 service population vs. General Plan 128,033 service population); therefore, they overestimated water demand by 64,444 service population. The 2010 UWMP-projected total water supply in 2030 was estimated to be 17,756 AFY, and the Approved Project’s projected water demand was estimated to be 14,814 AFY . This leaves an additional 12,942 AFY available beyond what was evaluated in the Certified EIR. Using the Certified EIR’s rate of 0.06 AFY per resident and a General Plan Buildout population increase of 4,621, the proposed Modified Project would result in an additional water demand of 277 A F Y. This is well within the surplus water supply of 2,942 AFY. Furthermore, the Certified EIR’s rate of 0.04 AFY per employee would not be realized from the non-residential uses on the housing sites, and therefore the actual water demand increase would be less than the estimated 277 AFY.

2023- 2031 HOUSING ELEMEN T , ZONING, AND SULLIVAN CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS :

ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE DALY CITY GENERAL PLAN UPDATE EIR

CITY OF DALY CITY

3. Environmental Analysis

Since the certification of the EIR, the 2020 UWMP was published and approved in May 2021.10 The 2020 UWMP applied a smaller projected growth from what was estimated in the 2030 General Plan for the year 2030 (i.e., 2020 UWMP 119,147 service population compared to General Plan 128,034 service population).11 According to the 2020 UWMP , the projected total water supply in 2030 would be 11,748 AFY (3,828 million gallons per year [MGY]), and the Approved Project 2030 water demand would be 8,136 AFY (2,651 MGY). Therefore, the surplus water supply would be 3,612 AFY during normal years, and the proposed Modified Project water demand of 277 AFY would be will within this surplus amount.

Since the publication of the 2010 UWMP , the per capita water consumption in Daly City has decreased from 53.6 gallons per capita per day (gpcd) or 0.06 AFY to 48 gpcd or 0.05 AFY . As new construction would be required to comply with CALGreen building codes, which typically result in a 20 percent reduction in water use, and the continued implementation of water conservation measures, water demand is expected to continue to decrease over time. In addition, multi-family residential land use uses less water than single-family residences because of reduced irrigation needs.

The 2020 UWMP states that there may be a deficit in water supply vs demand during single-year and multiple-year drought periods if the Bay Delta Plan is implemented, because the City’s surface water supplies from the San Francisco Public Utility Commission would be reduced. If the Bay Delta Plan is not implemented, there will be sufficient water supplies to meet demands under all conditions (normal, single-dry year and multiple-dry years). There are numerous lawsuits filed in both state and federal courts regarding implementation of the plan, and the SWRCB is in the process of amending the existing Bay Delta Plan. Therefore, the implementation of the plan and its implications on water purveyors in the Bay Area are still in flux.

Nevertheless, as described in the Certified EIR, in the event of drought scenarios or reduced surface water supplies, the City intends on using its local groundwater supply to buffer the impacts associated with concurrent reductions in surface water availability. If the length of the drought continues, the City would pump its sustainable yield average during the period to account for further planned reductions in surface water availability. As described in the Certified EIR, the City also would consider the use of standby emergency wells to provide for reliability/redundancy in the local groundwater basin so not to impact local health and safety. Furthermore, as suggested in the 2020 UWMP , additional options could include, but are not limited to, water transfers from other San Francisco Public Utility Commission wholesale customers, further groundwater exploration/development outside the existing developed groundwater basin, increased recycled water use, and/or increased conservation. For example, a new well producing

10 Daly City, May 2021, 2020 Urban Water Management Plan, https://www.dalycity.org/DocumentCenter/View/4834/DRAFT- 2020-Urban-Water-Management-Plan?bidId=, accessed August 23, 2023. 11 While the 2020 UWMP 2040 projections are aligned more closely to those in the Certified EIR for year 2030 (e.g. 2020 UWMP 127,028 service population vs. General Plan 128,034 service population), the difference in water demand in 2030 and 2040 are negligible (i.e., 2,651 MGY in 2030 v 2,655 MGY in 2040).

2023- 2031 HOUSING ELEMENT , ZONING, AND SULLIVAN CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS :

ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE DALY CITY GENERAL PLAN UPDATE EIR

CITY OF DALY CITY

3. Environmental Analysis
August 2024 Page 51
500 gallons per minute (0.72 million gallons per day or 803 AFY) would make up virtually all the projected shortfalls. Additionally, the City would have to comply with the proposed water conservation policies in the General Plan, thereby ensuring that impacts to water supply would be less than significant.

Since the certification of the EIR, the 2022 10-year Wastewater System Master Plan (2022 WSMP) was published and approved in August 2022.12 The system’s capacity was analyzed for existing and future conditions during dry and wet weather periods. Most of the projects identified for improvements in North San Mateo County Sanitation District’s previous 2009 Wastewater Master Plan have been implemented.

The City provided a list of projected future developments within the City to use in the new flow model, and the results indicated that future developments would have minimal effects on peak flows. Assuming the proposed Modified Project has a population of 4,621, a water demand of 48 gpcd, and a wastewater flow of 90 percent of the water demand, the estimated wastewater flow would be approximately 286,027 gallons per day (gpd). This is only 4.9 percent of the average dry weather flow of 5.81 million gallons per day that is transported to the wastewater treatment plant.

In general, the 2022 WSMP did not show deficiencies in the wastewater collection system during dry weather conditions. However, there were limited areas of the city that had undersized pipes that would contribute to sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs) during wet weather conditions. The 2022 WSMP identifies capital improvement projects, including upsizing of sewer pipes and replacement of terra cotta pipes, to ensure that the wastewater collection system has the capacity to contain wet weather flows. Because the proposed housing sites are scattered through the city, implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not adversely impact the wastewater collection system or create the need for expansion of the wastewater treatment plant.

As described in the Certified EIR, the Ox Mountain Landfill has a permitted maximum disposal rate of 3,598 tons per day. Applying the current generation rate of 2.3 pounds per resident per day in Daly City, the increase of 4,621 additional residents would increase the daily disposal of landfilled solid waste by 10,628 pounds (5.3 tons) per day. The disposal rate at Ox Mountain Landfill in 2022 was approximately 910 tons/day.
13 This results in the landfill’s residual capacity of 2,688 tons/day. The proposed Modified Project would generate an additional 5.3 tons/day, which is well within the residual capacity of the landfill.

In addition, the residential disposal rate of 2.3 pounds/day does not account for the reduction in landfill waste due to recycling and composting of organic material. Therefore, the proposed Modified Project would not generate waste that would exceed the landfill’s capacity or impair solid waste reduction goals.

In summary, the proposed Modified Project, like the Approved Project, would not require or result in construction or expansion of any public utilities and would be adequately served by existing water

12 North San Mateo County Sanitation District, August 5, 2022, 10-Year Wastewater System Master Plan, https://www.dalycity.org/1132/Daly-CityNSMCSD---Wastewater-System-Mast, accessed December 27, 2023. 13 In 2022, Ox Mountain received 283,927 tons divided by 312 operating days/year equals 910 tons/day.

2023- 2031 HOUSING ELEMEN T , ZONING, AND SULLIVAN CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS :

ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE DALY CITY GENERAL PLAN UPDATE EIR

CITY OF DALY CITY

3. Environmental Analysis

providers, wastewater treatment facilities, and landfill capacities. Therefore, the proposed Modified Project would not result in a new impact or a substantial increase in magnitude of the existing impacts analyzed in the Certified EIR related to utilities and service systems.

3.17 WILDFIRE
If located in or near State responsibility
areas or lands classified as very high fire
hazard severity zones, would the proposed
Modified Project:

Level of
Impact in
Certified EIR
Impacts of the Modified Project Compared to Certified EIR:

Same or
Reduced
Impact?
New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New
or
More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
a) Substantially impair an adopted
emergency response plan or
emergency evacuation plan?
2018 CEQA
Checklist
Question
N/A No No No
b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and
other factors, exacerbate wildfire
risks, and thereby expose project
occupants to, pollutant
concentrations from a wildfire or the
uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
2018 CEQA
Checklist
Question
N/A No No No
c) Require the installation or
maintenance of associated
infrastructure (such as roads, fuel
breaks, emergency water sources,
power lines or other utilities) that may
exacerbate fire risk or that may result
in temporary or ongoing impacts to
the environment?
2018 CEQA
Checklist
Question
N/A No No No
d) Expose people or structures to
significant risks, including downslope
or downstream flooding or landslides,
as a result of runoff, post-fire slope
instability, or drainage changes?
2018 CEQA
Checklist
Question
N/A No No No
Key: NI = no impact; LTS = less than significant; LTS/M = less than significant with mitigation; SU = significant and unavoidable Discussion:

Chapter 3.7, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, of the Certified EIR addressed the impacts to wildfire hazards associated with buildout of the Approved Project. The Certified EIR identified that while no portions of Daly City are classified as having a “Very High” fire threat, wildfire threat is present.

Accordingly, the General Plan policies would ensure adequate service from the North County Fire Authority and the threat of fire hazard (wildland fire in particular) was considered less than significant.

This section also addresses additional questions regarding wildfire-related impacts pursuant to the updated CEQA Guidelines that were adopted by the California Natural Resource Agency in December 2018. As stated in Section 3.4, Cultural and Tribal Cultural Resources, changes in law, regulation, or guidelines adoption are not “new information” if the information about the issue (i.e., wildfire) was

2023- 2031 HOUSING ELEMENT , ZONING, AND SULLIVAN CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS :

ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE DALY CITY GENERAL PLAN UPDATE EIR

CITY OF DALY CITY

3. Environmental Analysis
August 2024 Page 53
known or should have been known at the time the original EIR was certified. As evidenced in the Certified EIR conclusions regarding wildfire impacts, information about wildfire was known when the Daly City General Plan Update EIR was certified in 2013.

Daly City is not classified as a state responsibility area and does not include lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones; therefore, the proposed Modified Project would not result in significant wildfire impacts. In addition, the proposed Modified Project is a programmatic, policy-level change that identifies opportunity sites for residential development in urbanized areas where development currently exists.

Therefore, the proposed Modified Project would not increase in magnitude of wildfire-related impacts when compared to the Approved Project.

3.18 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
Would the proposed Modified Project:

Level of
Impact in the
Certified EIR
Impacts of the Modified Project Compared to Certified EIR:

Same or
Reduced
Impact?
New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New
or
More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
a) Have the potential to substantially
degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife species,
cause a fish or wildlife population to
drop below self-sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, substantially reduce the
number or restrict the range of a rare
or endangered plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of the
major periods of California history or
prehistory?
LTS Yes No No No
b) Have impacts that are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable?
(“Cumulatively considerable” means
that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed
in connection with the effects of past
projects, the effects of other current
projects, and the effects of probable
future projects.)
SU Yes No No No
c) Have environmental effects which will
cause substantial adverse effects on
human beings, either directly or
indirectly?
LTS Yes No No No
Key: NI = no impact; LTS = less than significant; LTS/M = less than significant with mitigation; SU = significant and unavoidable

2023- 2031 HOUSING ELEMEN T , ZONING, AND SULLIVAN CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS :

ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE DALY CITY GENERAL PLAN UPDATE EIR

CITY OF DALY CITY

3. Environmental Analysis

Discussion
With respect to biological and cultural resources, implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not change the Certified EIR Study Area boundaries and would not change the size or extent of disturbed areas that were analyzed in the Certified EIR. It would also only affect designated sites that are currently developed. Therefore, the proposed Modified Project would not change the scale or location of overall ground-disturbing activities, such as those that could occur from implementation of the Daly City General Plan. As discussed throughout this Addendum, including, but not limited to, Section 3.3, Biological Resources, and Section 3.4, Cultural and Tribal Cultural Resources, the proposed Modified Project would not result in a new impact or a substantial increase in magnitude of the existing impacts determined in the Certified EIR.

CEQA Guidelines Section 15355 defines cumulative impacts as two or more individual effects, which, when considered together, are considerable or which compound or increase other environmental impacts. Cumulative impacts may result from individually minor, but collectively significant projects taking place over a period of time. As described in Sections 3.1 through 3.17, implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not result in a new or a substantial increase in magnitude of the existing cumulatively considerable impacts of the Certified EIR.

Implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not change from the Daly City General Plan with respect to direct and indirect effects on human beings. The proposed Modified Project would increase the General Plan’s residential development program and reduce the non-residential development programs but would not increase or otherwise change the boundaries. As described in Sections 3.1 through 3.17, implementation of the proposed Modified Project would not result in a new impact or a substantial increase in magnitude of existing impacts of those of the Certified EIR.

August 2024 Page 55

4. Conclusion
As demonstrated in the Certified EIR and summarized in Section 3, Environmental Analysis, of this Addendum, all impacts from implementation of the Daly City General Plan were found to be less than significant except for the significant and unavoidable impacts related to noise and transportation. As shown in Section 3.12, Noise, these impacts would remain significant and unavoidable with implementation of the proposed Modified Project but would not be increased in severity. As shown in Section 3.16, Transportation, the significant and unavoidable impacts were related to level of service, which is no longer an appropriate metric for measuring impacts from vehicles. Impacts are now measured in VMT, and VMT impacts from the proposed Modified Project would be less than significant. Like the Approved Project, potential future development under the proposed Modified Project would be subject to applicable federal, State, and/or City regulations; undergo an appropriate level of environmental review; and implement mitigation measures from the Certified EIR as required.

As summarized below, and for the reasons described in Section 3, Environmental Analysis, the City has determined that an Addendum to the Certified EIR is appropriate for the proposed Modified Project.

None of the conditions analyzed under the Certified EIR have changed, nor does the proposed Modified Project, as an implementing tool of the Daly City General Plan, meet any of the criteria for preparing a subsequent or supplemental EIR. The proposed Modified Project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the Certified EIR, nor does the proposed Modified Project create substantially more severe significant effects than previously examined in the Certified EIR. The proposed Modified Project as implemented would remain consistent with the analysis in the Certified EIR.

4.1 SUBSTANTIAL CHANGES TO THE PROJECT
The proposed Modified Project is not a substantial change to the Certified EIR because it is within the Study Area described in the Certified EIR, discussed above in Section 2.2, Study Area. Consequently, there are no substantial changes proposed that will require major revisions of the Certified EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects.

4.2 SUBSTANTIAL CHANGES IN CIRCUMSTANCES
The proposed Modified Project would not result in substantial changes in physical circumstances that would cause a new significant impact or substantially increase the severity of a previously identified significant impact, and there have been no other changes in the circumstances that meet this criterion.

2023- 2031 HOUSING ELEMENT, ZONING, AND SULLIVAN CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS:

ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE DALY CITY GENERAL PLAN UPDATE EIR

CITY OF DALY CITY

4. Conclusion

There have been no changes in the environmental conditions in the Study Area that were not contemplated and analyzed in the Certified EIR and that would result in new or substantially more severe environmental impacts in association with implementation of the proposed Modified Project.

4.3 NEW INFORMATION
There is no new information of substantial importance (which was not known or could not have been known at the time of the Daly City General Plan adoption on March 25, 2013) that identifies a new significant impact; a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified significant impact; mitigation measures or alternatives previously found infeasible that would now be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the General Plan; or mitigation measures or alternatives that are considerably different from those analyzed in the Certified EIR and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment.

August 2024 Page 57

5. List of Preparers
This Addendum was prepared by the following individuals:

Lead Agency
Michael Van Lonkhuysen....................................................................................................... Planning Manager Report Preparers
PlaceWorks
Jenny Gastelum ....................................................................... Principal, Housing Element Principal-in-Charge Cynthia Walsh .............................................................. Senior Associate II, Housing Element Project Manager Terri McCracken ............................................................................... Principal, Addendum Principal-in-Charge Vivian Kha ............................................................................................ Associate, Addendum Project Manager Cathy Fitzgerald ............................................................................... Principal Engineer, Hydrology and Utilities Rachel Goren ......................................................................................... Associate, Primary Addendum Author

2023- 2031 HOUSING ELEMENT, ZONING, AND SULLIVAN CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS:

ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE DALY CITY GENERAL PLAN UPDATE EIR

CITY OF DALY CITY

5. List of Preparers

This page has been intentionally left blank.

ORDINANCE NO.

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DALY CITY AMENDING TITLE 17. RE: ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDING CHATPERS 17.04, 17.08,

17.09 17.12, 17.21, 17.45, 17.58, AND ADDING CHAPTER 17.60 RE: AIRPORT LAND

USE COMPATABILITY
The City Council of the City of Daly City, DOES ORDAIN as follows:

SECTION 1. Section 17.04.101 – Definitions – Building Height is amended to read as follows:

17.04.010—Definitions—Building Height. The minimum height of any new structure in the C-MU district shall be three stories or thirty feet. Any new buildings abutting lots zoned R-1 (single-family residential district) or R-1/A (single-family/duplex residential district) and over three stories or thirty feet high (whichever is lesser), shall adhere to the transitional height requirements in the C-MU objective design standards. Fifteen additional feet may be permitted for elevator shafts and rooftop mechanical equipment.

Building height is measured from the curb at the centerline of the building to the building's highest point. See Section 17.40.040 of the Daly City Zoning Ordinance for building height exceptions. For building structures with a flat roof, the height of the building shall be measured to the roof, not the parapet. Stair and elevator towers at the building roof may exceed the maximum building height by up to ten feet.

SECTION 2. Chapter 17.08 is hereby amended to read as follows:

Chapter 17.08 R-1 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT

17.08.010 Table of uses.

1. Uses Permitted 2. Use
Permit

3. Maximum
Height
(feet)

4. Minimum
Lot Area
(sq. ft.)

5. Minimum
Lot Width
(feet)

6. Maximum
Lot
Coverage

7. Minimum
Front
Yard
(feet)

8. Minimum
Rear
Yard
(feet)

9. Lot
Area Per
Dwellin
g Unit
(sq. ft.)
A. Single-family
dwellinga, home
occupation in
accordance with
the regulations
specified in
Chapter 17.36,
park, playground;
transitional
housing;
supportive
housinga.

No 30 3000-
2500b
33-
25;sup\sup;
50%—
55%
15 10 3000-
2500d

Secondary
dwelling in
accordance with
the standards and
requirements
specified in
Section

17.40.100, small
family day care
home
B. Accessory
building
Yes 15
C. Large family
day care homes
in accordance
with the
regulations
specified in
Chapter 17.49
Yese 30
D. Day care
center, accessory
use, dwelling
group, golf
course (not
including driving
range or
miniature golf)
Yes
E. Public utility
facilities and
public service
uses, including
pumping stations,
fire stations,
reservoirs, public
utility buildings
and uses, railroad
or rapid transit
facilities or other
public buildings
or use
F. Community
service uses,
including

community
center (publicly
owned), library,
schools
(elementary,
junior high, high,
but not including
trade, business or
other similar
schools) a
G. Churcha Yes 50 10,000 100
a. Use conditionally compatible within the CNEL 65dB airport noise contour and must comply with the provisions outlined in the SFO ALUCP.
b. See Section 17.38.040
c. See Section 17.38.060
d. See Section 17.38.050
e. Administrative use permit required pursuant to Chapter 17.49 f. Subject only to those restrictions that apply to other residential dwellings of the same type in the same zone.

SECTION 3. Chapter 17.09 is hereby amended to read as follows:

Chapter 17.09 R-1/A SINGLE-FAMILY/DUPLEX RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT

17.09.010 Purpose.

It is the purpose of the R-1/A district to protect existing neighborhoods of primarily single- family homes. It is intended that the R-1/A district provide for single-family residences, duplexes through use permit procedures, schools, parks, playgrounds and other public facilities and services necessary for the functioning of low to medium low density residential neighborhoods. The range of density classes indicated for the R-1/A district is intended to permit the implementation of the density range in the general plan.
(Ord. 886 § 1 (part), 1978: prior code § 8A.1)

17.09.020 Permitted principal uses.

The following are the principal uses permitted in the R-1/A district:

A. Single-family dwelling.

B. Two-unit structures (duplexes), subject to Objective Design Standards adopted by the City Council.

C. State authorized, certified or licensed family care home, foster home or group home serving six or fewer mentally disordered or otherwise handicapped persons or dependent and neglected children; such homes shall provide care on a twenty-four- hour-a-day basis.

D. State authorized, certified or licensed small family day care home serving six or fewer children.

E. Secondary dwelling in accordance with the standards and requirements specified in Section 17.40.100.

17.09.030 Permitted accessory uses.

The following are the accessory uses permitted in the R-1/A district: an accessory building or use customarily appurtenant to a permitted principal use and not exceeding in floor area more than ten percent of the total lot area.

17.09.040 Conditional uses.

A large family day care home is a conditional use which may be permitted in the R-1/A district subject to the securing of an administrative use permit pursuant to Chapter 17.49.

The following are the conditional uses which may be permitted in the R-1/A district subject to the securing of a use permit pursuant to Chapter 17.44:

A. Day care center as defined in Section 17.04.010(12.1) and public or private schools, not including trade, business or professional schools;
B. Public utility facility and public service use;
C. Community center, library, church, golf course, country club; D. Radio and/or television transmission and/or receiving facilities in excess of forty feet in height from ground level or fifteen feet above the highest point of the existing roof line, whichever is least;
E. Accessory building or use other than as defined by Section 17.09.030.

17.09.050 Area, height, yard, and coverage requirements.

Except for those standards outlined in this title, and except as otherwise specified as a condition of a use permit, all structures in the R-1/A district shall be subject to the following regulations:

A. Minimum lot area, two thousand five hundred square feet; B. Minimum lot frontage, twenty-five feet;
C. Maximum building height, thirty feet;
D. Minimum front yard, fifteen feet;
E. Minimum rear yard, ten feet;
F. Minimum side yard, no requirement;
G. Maximum lot coverage, fifty-five percent.

SECTION 4. Chapter 17.12.010 is hereby amended to read as follows:

Chapter 17.12.010 - Multiple Family Residential Table of uses.

1. Uses Permitted 2. Use
Permit

3. Maximum
Height
(feet)

4. Minimum
Lot Area
(sq. ft)

5. Minimu
m Lot
Width
(feet)

6. Maximum
Lot
Coverage

7. Minimum
Front Yard
(feet)

8. Minimum
Rear Yard
(feet)
Allowable
Density

Multiple-family
dwellings, upon
compliance with
Objective Design
Standards a,b
No 120c,d 43,560 33-25a 100% 15, unless
complying
with
Objective
Design
Standards
10, unless
complying
with
Objective
Design
Standards
Refer to
General
Plan Future
Land Use
Map
a Use conditionally compatible within the CNEL 65dB airport noise contour and must comply with the provisions outlined in the SFO ALUCP.
b Housing Development projects located on Priority Housing Sites identified to meet the lower income RHNA in the City’s Housing Element (Table HE 52), are required to be developed at a minimum density of 20 dwelling units per acre, and providing at least 20% of the total units in the development as affordable to lower income households are eligible for by-right approval as defined in Government Code Section 65583.2(i), which means that they are exempt from CEQA.c Fifteen additional feet may be permitted for elevator shafts and rooftop mechanical equipment. d All allowable heights shall be subject to additional height limitations imposed by the SFO ALUCP.

SECTION 5. Chapter 17.21.030 is hereby amended to read as follows:

Chapter 17.21.030 - SPECIFIC PLAN DESIGNATIONS AND REGULATIONS.

R-H
Residential High Density

1. Uses
Permitted

2. Use
Permit

3. Maximum
Height
(feet)

4. Minimum
Lot Area
(sq. ft.)

5. Minimum
Lot Width
(feet)

6. Minimum
Front
Yard
(feet)

7. Minimum
Lot
Coverage

8. Minimum
Rear Yard
(feet)
Allowable
Density
A.  Multiple-
family
dwellings, upon
compliance with
Objective
Design
Standardsab
No 120c
43,560a
25-33c 15 75% (no
maximum)
10 Refer to
General
Plan Future
Land Use
Map
a Use conditionally compatible within the CNEL 65dB airport noise contour and must comply with the provisions outlined in the SFO ALUCP.
b Housing Development projects located on Priority Housing Sites identified to meet the lower income RHNA in the City’s Housing Element (Table HE 52), are required to be developed at a minimum density of 20 dwelling units per acre, and providing at least 20% of the total units in the development as affordable to lower income households are eligible for by-right approval as defined in Government Code Section 65583.2(i), which means that they are exempt from CEQA. c Fifteen additional feet may be permitted for elevator shafts and rooftop mechanical equipment. d See Section 17.38.040.

SECTION 6. Chapter 17.45.130 is hereby repealed and replaced to read as follows:

17.45.130 Objective Design Standards.

Residential projects consisting of two or more dwelling units shall be subject to Objective Design Standards (ODS) established by City Council resolution. Projects determined by the Planning Division to comply with ODS shall be deemed in compliance with the Zoning Ordinance, with no further regulation as to this Chapter, and shall be considered non-discretionary in nature for the purpose for the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

SECTION 7. Chapter 17.58.040 s hereby amended to read as follows:

17.58.040 Height regulations.

No new structure in the C-MU district shall exceed 15 stories or 175 feet in height, as measured according to DCMC 17.04.010—Definitions—Building Height. Fifteen additional feet may be permitted for elevator shafts and rooftop mechanical equipment The minimum height of any new structure in the C-MU district shall be three stories or thirty feet. Any new buildings abutting lots zoned R-1 (single-family residential district) or R-1/A (single-family/duplex residential district) and over three stories or thirty feet high (whichever is lesser), shall adhere to the transitional height requirements in the C-MU objective design standards.

Building height is measured from the curb at the centerline of the building to the building's highest point. See Section 17.40.040 of the Daly City Zoning Ordinance for building height exceptions. For building structures with a flat roof, the height of the building shall be measured to the roof, not the parapet. Stair and elevator towers at the building roof may exceed the maximum building height by up to ten feet.

SECTION 8. Chapter 17.60 is hereby added to the Daly City Municipal Code to read as follows:

Chapter 17.60 - AIRPORT LAND USE COMPATIBILITY PLAN CONSISTENCY

17.60.010 - General provisions.

This section establishes standards and requirements related to consistency with the Comprehensive Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan for the Environs of San Francisco International Airport (ALUCP). The following requirements and criteria shall be incorporated into all projects located within the Airport Influence Area applicable to Daly City in the Airport Land Use Plan.

17.60.020 - Airport Real Estate Disclosure Notices.

All new development, including all residential structures. shall be required to comply with the real estate disclosure requirements of California Business and Professions Code Section 11010(b)(13). The following statement shall be included in the notice of intention to offer the property for sale or lease:

“Notice of Airport in Vicinity. This property is presently located in the vicinity of an airport, within what is known as an airport influence area. For that reason, the property may be subject to some of the annoyances or inconveniences associated with proximity to airport operations (for example: noise, vibration, or odors).

Individual sensitivities to those annoyances can vary from person to person. You may wish to consider what airport annoyances, if any, are associated with the property before you complete your purchase and determine whether they are acceptable to you.”

17.60.030 - General provisions Airport Noise Evaluation and Mitigation.

Project applicants shall be required to evaluate potential airport noise impacts if the project is located within the CNEL 65 dB contour line of San Francisco International Airport (as mapped in the ALUCP). All projects so located shall be required to mitigate impacts to comply with the interior (CNEL 45 dB or lower, unless otherwise stated) and exterior noise standards established by the ALUCP or [insert city name] General Plan, whichever is more restrictive.

17.60.040 - General provisions Avigation Easement.

Any action that would either permit or result in the development or construction of a land use considered to be conditionally compatible with aircraft noise of CNEL 65 dB or greater (as mapped in the ALUCP) shall include the grant of an avigation easement to the City and County of San Francisco prior to issuance of a building permit(s) for any proposed buildings or structures, consistent with ALUCP Policy NP-3 Grant of Avigation Easement.

A.Maximum Compatible Building Height. Building heights, including related roof- mounted equipment, stair/elevator towers, antennae, exhaust stacks, and other appurtenances, shall not exceed the maximum height limits permissible under either FAA regulations or the Critical Aeronautical Surfaces identified in SFO ALUCP. For avoidance of doubt, the lower of the two heights identified by the ALUCP and the FAA shall be the controlling maximum height. Upon receiving any application for land use entitlement or building permit, the Planning Division shall consult with SFO/CCAG to determine a proposed project’s compliance with this requirement.

B.Other Flight Hazards. Within Airport Influence Area (AIA) B, certain land use characteristics are recognized as hazards to air navigation and, per ALUCP Policy AP-4, need to be evaluated to ensure compatibility with FAA rules and regulations.

These characteristics include the following:

1. Sources of glare, such as highly reflective buildings, building features, or blight lights including search lights, or laser displays, which would interfere with the vision of pilots in command of an aircraft in flight.

2. Distracting lights that could be mistaken for airport identification lightings, runway edge lighting, runway end identification lighting, or runway approach lighting.

3. Sources of dust, smoke, water vapor, or steam that may impair the visibility of a pilot in command of and aircraft in flight.

4. Sources of electrical/electronic interference with aircraft communications/navigation equipment.

5. Any use that creates an increased attraction for wildlife, particularly large flocks of birds, that is inconsistent with FAA rules and regulations, including but not limited to FAA Order 5200.5A, Waste Disposal Site On or Near Airports and FAA Advisory Circular 150/5200-33B, Hazardous Wildlife Attractants On or Near Airports and any successor or replacement orders or advisory circulars.

SECTION 9. Effective Date and Publication:Pursuant to the provisions of Government Code Section 36933, a summary of this Ordinance shall be prepared by the City Attorney. At least five (5) days prior to the Council meeting at which this Ordinance is scheduled to be adopted, the City Clerk shall (1) publish the summary, and (2) post in the City Clerk’s office a certified copy of this Ordinance. Within fifteen (15) days after the adoption of this ordinance, the City Clerk shall (1) publish the summary, and (2) post in the City Clerk’s office a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance along with the names of those City Council members voting for and against this ordinance or otherwise voting. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days from and after its adoption.

SECTION 10. Environmental Determination:The City Council approves the addendum to the General Plan EIR for this project and hereinafter finds that addendum to the General Plan EIR complies and conforms with the California Environmental Quality Act and the Guidelines implementing the Act.

SECTION 11. Severability: If any section, subsection or sentence of this Ordinance is found by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unlawful, the City Council finds and declares that the remainder of this Ordinance would be and is enforceable and would have been adopted notwithstanding the finding of invalidity as to any section, subsection or sentence.

Introduced this day of 2024.

Passed and adopted as an Ordinance of the City of Daly City at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Daly City held on the day of 2024, by the following vote:

AYES, Councilmembers
NOES, Councilmembers
ABSENT, Councilmembers:

CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF DALY CITY
APPROVED:

MAYOR OF THE CITY OF DALY CITY

1 ORDINANCE NO.

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DALY CITY AMENDING THE DALY CITY ZONING MAP BY AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1424 RE: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR PD-57B
(APN 091-247-080)
525 Serramonte Boulevard, Daly City
BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Daly City, as follows:

Section 1. Findings.The City Council of the City of Daly City finds that, as conditioned, Planned Development PD 9-14-9637, amending Planned Development PD-57A is in compliance with Title 17 of the Daly City Municipal Code (Zoning Ordinance), as well as the General Plan of the City of Daly City, as amended and as to each element of the Daly City General Plan. Approval of the zone change will not be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort and general welfare of persons residing in or working in the neighborhood. The City Council further finds that the amendment to the Planned Development PD-57A zoning to allow for the residential uses at this site, will not be detrimental to the surrounding areas or result in substantial environmental damage or disturbance or be injurious or detrimental to the property and improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the City of Daly City. The City Council further finds that the adoption of PD-57B will not be detrimental to the surrounding areas or result in substantial environmental damage or disturbance or be injurious or detrimental to the property and improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the City of Daly City.

Section 2. Environmental Compliance – Addendum to the General Plan EIR.

The City Council has reviewed the proposal under the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined, that an addendum to the General Plan EIR is the appropriate environmental review fa Mitigated Negative Declaration is the appropriate level of environmental review. The Daly City Planning Commission and City staff recommend that an addendum to the General Plan EIR per CEQA Guidelines be adopted for this project.

The City Council approves the addendum to the General Plan EIR for this project and hereinafter finds that addendum to the General Plan EIR complies and conforms with the California Environmental Quality Act and the Guidelines implementing the Act.

Section 3. Zoning Reclassification.The zoning as designated upon the “Official Zoning Map” of the City of Daly City, as adopted by Daly City Ordinance No. 635, and thereafter amended from time to time, is hereby changed as to the parcel identified on the attached map incorporated herein by this reference, to Planned Development Zoning PD-57B, which hereinafter provides for a change of boundary on the “Official Zoning Map” and the establishment of specific standards for development on the subject property. All improvement shall comply with the approved Planned Development Standards hereinafter adopted for Planned Development PD-57B. .

2 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONE PD-57B
525 SERRAMONTE BOULEVARD

SERRAMONTE VIEWS CONDOMINUMS
The purpose and intent of these Planned Development Standards is to establish a Planned Development Zoning District for PD-57B, which encompasses the entire project site.

I. GENERAL
A. When these planned development standards conflict with other sections of the Zoning Ordinance, these standards prevail only to the extent of the conflict.

Where these planned development standards do not provide regulations, the Zoning Ordinance shall apply as to the most similar land use or standard.

B. Any modifications to plans approved by the City Council shall require an amendment of the original PD approval and shall be subject to separate approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. Minor changes of the approved plans due to code requirements or conditions of approval may be approved by the Planning Division.

C. All structures, landscape areas, required facilities and amenities shall be maintained in a neat, safe, and healthful condition, subject to improvement and upgrading of plans as required by this Planned Development approval.

D. CC&R’s shall be prepared for PD-57B for review and approval by the City Attorney.

II. PERMITTED USES
The following uses are permitted as part of Planned Development Zone PD-57B.

A. The following uses may be permitted with a Use Permit in the nonresidential portion of PD-57B zone:

Administrative, business and professional offices
Banks and savings and loan offices
Finance Companies
Title Companies
Travel Agencies
Medical and dental clinics and laboratories
Prescription pharmacies
Public Uses
B. Planned Development PD-57B shall be limited to a total of 323 units and associated parking and recreational facilities, plus an additional 176 residential units up to a maximum density of 135 dwelling units per acre.

3 C. When a use is not specifically listed, it shall be assumed that when the unlisted use is similar to nor more objectionable than a permitted use, such use shall be permitted in the district to the same requirements of the most similarly listed use.

III. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
A. Parking

1. The property owners shall comply with and enforce a Parking Management Plan approved by the City. The Parking Management Plan shall be an appendix to and recorded as part of the Planned Development Standards for PD-57B and the CC&R’s for PD-57B. The Parking Management Plan shall include the following:
a. Operable or inoperable vehicles shall be stored at the site for more than 24 hours.
b. No vehicles or trailers shall be advertised for sale or rent on the site and no vehicle sales, leasing or rentals shall be conducted at the site.
c. Residential parking spaces shall be designated in the plan. d. Measures to manage the parking during the peak hours. The plan may include such measures as valet parking, and incentives to carpooling.
e. Lease documents of existing and future tenants shall incorporate compliance with the Parking Management Plan as a requirement of the lease. Lease documents shall be submitted to the Planning Division for approval.
f. Applicant will post signs, impose conditions upon tenant, and make every effort to restrict deliveries to the development from by large semi-trucks, refrigerated trucks, or trucks larger than a four wheel delivery van between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. seven days per week. Smaller delivery vehicles may make such deliveries. j. The total number of on-site parking spaces shall reflect the parking provision of the approved plans, i.e., 480 dedicated residential spaces and 149 dedicated hotel spaces, with the ability for up 80 valet hotel spaces which could occur within the drive aisles on any of the hotel’s four parking levels. The use of carousel parking system shall be permitted for up to 342 spaces. The project shall provide a minimum of 19 electric vehicle charging stations equipped with minimum level two chargers and 172 bicycle parking spaces.
k. An office development will have to meet the parking standards as established in the Zoning Ordinance Chapter 17.34

4 c. The parking areas shall conform to plans approved as part of the precise plan for PD-57B and shall be maintained in accordance with City standards.

B. Circulation

1. All deliveries shall gain access to the project site by way of Serramonte Boulevard
a. Deliveries to the development by large semi-type trucks shall not take place before 8 a.m. or after 10 p.m. Smaller delivery vehicles may deliver at all hours.
b. The applicant shall implement a Congestion Management Plan, per the C/CAG Guidelines for Implementation of the Land Use Component of the Congestion Management Program, which will include but not be limited to, provisions for such programs as carpooling, preferential parking and use of the Hire Daly City First Program and encouraging a hiring preference for local residents.

C. Landscaping

1. All landscaping improvements shall conform to the approved landscaping plan and with Section 17.41 (Landscaping) of the Zoning Ordinance. a. Landscaping shall be installed in accordance with approved plans and maintained in a neat, clean and healthful condition. b. In general, all shrubs or any vegetation at points of ingress or egress shall be maintained at a height of no greater than 30 inches. Trees must be trimmed in a manner to maintain a site clearance underneath the branches of five feet from grade.
c. Landscaping shall be planted at the base of any monument signs and shall be maintained in a healthy growing condition and be replaced as necessary. The plants shall include a variety of flowering evergreen shrubs and flowering ground cover.

D. Architecture/Site Design

1. Architectural design of all structures and facades, all materials and colors, and all landscaping shall comply with plans approved by a Design Review Committee.
a. Once approved, any major architectural modification shall be subject to approval by a Design Review Committee, except that minor changes may be approved administratively by the Planning Division.

5 b. All roof equipment shall be screened from view from the surrounding streets.
c. The Planning Division shall approve the design and location of all trash or storage enclosures and other proposed fencing or walls. d. All visible elevations shall be provided with architectural treatment of the same quality and character as the front building elevations facing Serramonte Boulevard.
e. All ground mounted appurtenances, such as transformers or air conditioning units shall be undergrounded.

E. Maintenance

1. A maintenance plan for on-site litter control shall be submitted by the applicant and approved by the City. The litter control maintenance plan shall include provision for on-going maintenance required for the project use. The maintenance plan shall be incorporated into the CC&R’s for the project and recorded as part of the PD-57B planned development standards. The maintenance plan shall include the following standards:
a. The entire development area shall be maintained in a neat, safe, and healthful condition.
b. A garbage disposal plan approved by the Planning Division and the Streets Division shall specify that:
c. All trash shall be confined in approved receptacles and enclosures. d. All unenclosed materials, equipment and/or supplies of any kind shall be maintained within approved enclosure areas. Any stacked or stored items shall not exceed the height of the enclosure. e. All trash and storage enclosures shall be properly maintained in accordance with approved plans.
f. The applicant shall prepare an agreement to implement a weekly litter cleanup plan for all open areas, planters and public sidewalks adjacent to the development. All waste materials generated by the development, such as cardboard boxes, skids, garbage, litter, etc., must be stored in the enclosure for disposal. No waste material shall be visible at anytime. All enclosures shall be designed to conceal the contents. All enclosures should be kept clean and free of odor at all times.

F. Lighting
I. All exterior lighting shall be in accordance with precise plans and shall be adequately maintained according to approved standards.

6 a. Site lighting shall be directed downward to protect adjacent residential neighborhoods from glare.

G. Building Area Limitation

1. There shall be no additional square footage allowed in PD-57B beyond what is permitted through approval of the precise plan. Minor additions or alterations to square footage for any given designated use (+/- 2%) may be approved by the Planning Division if such changes are to meet specific code requirements and do not effect the overall mass of the building. a. The residential portion of the project shall include 3 separate buildings, each with no more than 185,000 square feet of residential floor area. Under each building, there shall be parking facilities. Each of the four buildings will have no more than 70,000 square feet of parking garage underneath. .
b. The hotel development shall include up to 155,000 square feet hotel space and a three-level garage, with up to 130,000 square feet provided for parking.

H. Building Height Limitation
The maximum height allowed for PD-57B is 250 feet, except that the maximum building height of the 15 additional feet may be permitted for elevator shafts and rooftop mechanical equipment. Building heights shall be subject to additional height limitations imposed by the SFO Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan.

I. Housing Development projects located on Priority Housing Sites Housing Development projects located on Priority Housing Sites identified to meet the lower income RHNA in the City’s Housing Element (Table HE 52), are required to be developed at a minimum density of 20 dwelling units per acre, and providing at least 20% of the total units in the development as affordable to lower income households are eligible for by-right approval as defined in Government Code Section 65583.2(i), which means that they are exempt from CEQA.

7 Section 4. Effective Date and Publication:Pursuant to the provisions of Government Code Section 36933, a summary of this Ordinance shall be prepared by the City Attorney. At least five (5) days prior to the Council meeting at which this Ordinance is scheduled to be adopted, the City Clerk shall (1) publish the summary, and (2) post in the City Clerk’s office a certified copy of this Ordinance. Within fifteen (15) days after the adoption of this ordinance, the City Clerk shall (1) publish the summary, and (2) post in the City Clerk’s office a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance along with the names of those City Council members voting for and against this ordinance or otherwise voting. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days from and after its adoption.

Section 5. Environmental Determination:The City Council approves the addendum to the General Plan EIR for this project and hereinafter finds that addendum to the General Plan EIR complies and conforms with the California Environmental Quality Act and the Guidelines implementing the Act.

Section 6. Severability: If any section, subsection or sentence of this Ordinance is found by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unlawful, the City Council finds and declares that the remainder of this Ordinance would be and is enforceable and would have been adopted notwithstanding the finding of invalidity as to any section, subsection or sentence.

Introduced this day of 2024.

Passed and adopted as an Ordinance of the City of Daly City at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Daly City held on the day of 2024, by the following vote:

AYES, Councilmembers
NOES, Councilmembers
ABSENT, Councilmembers:

CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF DALY CITY
APPROVED:

MAYOR OF THE CITY OF DALY CITY

1 ORDINANCE NO.

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DALY CITY AMENDING THE DALY CITY ZONING MAP BY AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1308 RE: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR PD-59A
(APN 003-224-100)
6401 Mission Street Daly City
BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Daly City, as follows:

Section 1. Findings.The City Council of the City of Daly City finds that, as conditioned, that amending Planned Development PD-59 is in compliance with Title 17 of the Daly City Municipal Code (Zoning Ordinance), as well as the General Plan of the City of Daly City, as amended and as to each element of the Daly City General Plan. Approval of the zone change will not be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort and general welfare of persons residing in or working in the neighborhood. The City Council further finds that the amendment to the Planned Development PD-59 zoning to allow for the residential uses at this site, will not be detrimental to the surrounding areas or result in substantial environmental damage or disturbance or be injurious or detrimental to the property and improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the City of Daly City. The City Council further finds that the adoption of PD-59A will not be detrimental to the surrounding areas or result in substantial environmental damage or disturbance or be injurious or detrimental to the property and improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the City of Daly City.

Section 2. Environmental Compliance – Addendum to the General Plan EIR.

The City Council has reviewed the proposal under the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined, that an addendum to the General Plan EIR is the appropriate environmental review. The Daly City Planning Commission and City staff recommend that an addendum to the General Plan EIR per CEQA Guidelines be adopted for this project.

The City Council approves the addendum to the General Plan EIR for this project and hereinafter finds that addendum to the General Plan EIR complies and conforms with the California Environmental Quality Act and the Guidelines implementing the Act.

Section 3. Zoning Reclassification.The zoning as designated upon the “Official Zoning Map” of the City of Daly City, as adopted by Daly City Ordinance No. 635, and thereafter amended from time to time, is hereby changed as to the parcel identified on the attached map incorporated herein by this reference, to Planned Development Zoning PD-59A, which hereinafter provides for a change of boundary on the “Official Zoning Map” and the establishment of specific standards for development on the subject property. All improvement shall comply with the approved Planned Development Standards hereinafter adopted for Planned Development PD-59A.

2 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONE PD-59A
6401 MISSION STREET

LANDMARK PLAZA
The purpose and intent of these Planned Development Standards is to establish a Planned Development Zoning District for PD-59A, which encompasses the entire project site.

I. GENERAL
A. When these planned development standards conflict with other sections of the Zoning Ordinance, these standards prevail only to the extent of the conflict. Where these planned development standards do not provide regulations, the Zoning Ordinance shall apply as to the most similar land use or standard.

B Any modifications to plans approved by the City Council shall require an amendment of the original PD approval and shall be subject to separate approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. Minor changes of the approved plans due to code requirements or conditions of approval may be approved by the Planning Division.

C. All structures, landscape areas, required facilities and amenities shall be maintained in a neat, safe, and healthful condition, subject to improvement and upgrading of plans as required by this Planned Development approval.

D. CC&R’s shall be prepared for PD-59A for review and approval by the City Attorney through the Major Subdivision and Use Permit Process.

E. The property owners of PD-59A shall seek to provide a balanced mix of uses with compatible peak hours and parking needs.

II. PERMITTED USES
The following uses are permitted as part of Planned Development Zone PD-59A.

A. The following uses shall be permitted in the Phase I, non-residential portion, of PD- 59A:

Art Studio
Bakery (retail)
Bank
Barber or Beauty shop
Book or stationary store
Business office
Candy store
Clothing store
Coffee shop
Drugstore

3 Retail household appliance sales and services
Florist
Gift shop
Ice cream store
Laundry or cleaning stores
Instruction studio (dance or martial arts)
Jewelry store
Medical/Dental clinic
Pet food store
Professional office
Photographic studio
Restaurant (excluding drive-through)
Shoe repair
Sporting goods
Tailor shop
Trade or business school
Toy Store
Travel agent
Variety store
Video rental
B. The following uses will be permitted with a Use Permit in the Phase I, nonresidential portion, of PD-59A zone:

Accessory buildings or use
Bar or Cocktail lounge
One health and fitness club
Outdoor sales
Pet shop businesses whose principal use is for the operation of amusement devices
Veterinary hospital or office
C. The following uses shall be permitted at the first floor of Phase II:

Administrative, business and professional offices
Banks and savings and loan offices
Finance companies
Title companies
Travel agencies
Medical and dental clinics and laboratories
Prescription pharmacies
Public Uses
Only residential uses shall be permitted on the remaining floors of Phase 2. Fifteen additional feet may be permitted for elevator shafts and rooftop mechanical equipment.

The allowance of residential uses shall not be subject to discretionary approval and shall instead be subject to Objective Design Standards.

4 D. The Phase 1 residential portion of PD-59A shall be limited to 95 condominium units. This numerical limitation shall not apply to Phase 2.

E. When a use is not specifically listed, it shall be assumed that when the unlisted use is similar to nor more objectionable than a permitted use, such use shall be permitted in the district to the same requirements of the most similarly listed use.

II. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
A. Parking

1. The property owners shall comply with and enforce a Parking Management Plan approved by the City. The Parking Management Plan shall be an appendix to and recorded as part of the Planned Development Standards for PD-59A and the CC&R’s for PD-59A. The Parking Management Plan shall include the following:
a. Operable or inoperable vehicles shall be stored at the site for more than 24 hours.
b. No vehicles or trailers shall be advertised for sale or rent on the site and no vehicle sales, leasing or rentals shall be conducted at the site. c. Residential parking spaces shall be designated in the plan. d. Measures to manage the parking during the peak hours. The plan may include such measures as valet parking, incentives to carpooling and disincentives to parking in the residential streets behind the development.
e. Lease documents of existing and future tenants shall incorporate compliance with the Parking Management Plan as a requirement of the lease. Lease documents shall be submitted to the Planning Division for approval.
f. A provision to allow shared parking for patrons of all commercial uses and the War Memorial Community Center in PD-59A, with the exception that parking specifically designated for the residential users and the 15 designated spaces for exclusive use of the War Memorial Community Center.
g. The precise plan shall show all required dimensions on back-up distance, fire access drives and parking stalls, including compact and handicap spaces. The plan shall indicate how the compact spaces shall be marked on the site.
i. Applicant will post signs, impose conditions upon tenant, and make every effort to restrict deliveries to the development from by large semi-trucks, refrigerated trucks, or trucks larger than a four wheel

5 delivery van between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. seven days per week. Smaller delivery vehicles may make such deliveries. j. The total number of on-site parking spaces required for the Landmark Plaza development is 443.
k. Total parking for Phase I and II will be 443 parking spaces contained in the parking garage and the parking platform accessible from Hillside Boulevard. Parking in this garage will be made available through a shared parking program for retail/commercial uses and War Memorial Community Center patrons.
c. The parking areas shall conform to plans approved as part of the precise plan for PD-59A and shall be maintained in accordance with City standards.

B. Signage

1. All project site signage shall conform to the Master Sign Program (MSP) for PD-59A. All changes to the MSP shall be submitted to the Design Review Committee for approval, except that minor changes can be approved administratively by the Planning Division.

2. The Master Sign Program shall be an appendix to and recorded as part of the Planned Development Standards for PD-59A and the CC&R’s for PD- 59A.

C. Circulation

1. All deliveries shall gain access to the project site by way of Mission Street. a. Deliveries to the development by large semi-type trucks shall not take place before 8 a.m. or after 10 p.m. Smaller delivery vehicles may deliver at all hours.
b. The applicant shall implement a Congestion Management Plan, per the C/CAG Guidelines for Implementation of the Land Use Component of the Congestion Management Program, which will include but not be limited to, provisions for such programs as carpooling, preferential parking and use of the Hire Daly City First Program and encouraging a hiring preference for local residents.

D. Landscaping

1. All landscaping improvements shall conform to the approved landscaping plan and with Section 17.41 (Landscaping) of the Zoning Ordinance. a. Landscaping shall be installed in accordance with approved plans and maintained in a neat, clean and healthful condition.

6 b. In general, all shrubs or any vegetation at points of ingress or egress shall be maintained at a height of no greater than 30 inches. Trees must be trimmed in a manner to maintain a site clearance underneath the branches of five feet from grade.
c. Landscaping shall be planted at the base of any monument signs and shall be maintained in a healthy growing condition and be replaced as necessary. The plants shall include a variety of flowering evergreen shrubs and flowering ground cover.

E. Architecture/Site Design

1.Architectural design of all structures and facades, all materials and colors, and all landscaping shall comply with plans approved by a Design Review Committee.
b. Once approved, any major architectural modification shall be subject to approval by a Design Review Committee, except that minor changes may be approved administratively by the Planning Division.
c. All roof equipment shall be screened from view from the surrounding streets.
d. The Planning Division shall approve the design and location of all trash or storage enclosures and other proposed fencing or walls. e. All visible elevations shall be provided with architectural treatment of the same quality and character as the front building elevations facing Mission Street and Hillside Boulevard.
f. All restaurants shall be provided with a state-of-the-art, low-noise, air filtration system to remove odors from air emissions caused by cooking.
g. A landscaped plaza shall be provided at the north end of the office tower in PD-59A. No structures other than underground
appurtenances, directional signs or other minor structures shall be constructed in this plaza. During the interim period after construction of Phase I and before construction of Phase II, a landscape area should be developed where the Phase II office tower will be built to prevent an unfinished appearance.
h. All ground mounted appurtenances, such as transformers or air conditioning units shall be undergrounded.

7 F. Maintenance

1. A maintenance plan for on-site litter control shall be submitted by the applicant and approved by the City. The litter control maintenance plan shall include provision for on-going maintenance required for the project use. The maintenance plan shall be incorporated into the CC&R’s for the project and recorded as part of the PD-59A planned development standards.

The maintenance plan shall include the following standards:
a. The entire development area shall be maintained in a neat, safe, and healthful condition.
b. A garbage disposal plan approved by the Planning Division and the Streets Division shall specify that:
c. All trash shall be confined in approved receptacles and enclosures. d. All unenclosed materials, equipment and/or supplies of any kind shall be maintained within approved enclosure areas. Any stacked or stored items shall not exceed the height of the enclosure. e All trash and storage enclosures shall be properly maintained in accordance with approved plans.
f. The applicant shall prepare an agreement to implement a weekly litter cleanup plan for all open areas, planters and public sidewalks adjacent to the development. All waste materials generated by the development, such as cardboard boxes, skids, garbage, litter, etc., must be stored in the enclosure for disposal. No waste material shall be visible at anytime. All enclosures shall be designed to conceal the contents. All enclosures should be kept clean and free of odor at all times.

G. Lighting

1. All exterior lighting shall be in accordance with precise plans and shall be adequately maintained according to approved standards.
a. Site lighting shall be directed downward to protect adjacent residential neighborhoods from glare.

H. Building Area Limitation

1. Aside from additional square feet allowed in Phase 2, there shall be no additional square footage allowed in PD-59A beyond what is permitted through approval of the precise plan. Minor additions or alterations to square footage for any given designated use (+/- 2%) may be approved by the Planning Division if such changes are to meet specific code requirements and do not effect the overall mass of the building.

8 a. Phase I shall include 17,050 (17,050) square feet commercial, 101,250 square feet residential, and 242,380 square feet for parking garage/podium structure.

I. Building Height Limitation

1. The maximum height allowed on Mission Street for PD-59A is 83 feet for Phase I and 150 feet for Phase II. The maximum allowed height on Hillside Boulevard for Phase I shall be 61 feet. Building heights shall be subject to additional height limitations imposed by the SFO Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan.

J. Hours of Operation

1. The hours of retail store operation shall not be limited. However, if the store operation receives significant complaints due to noise or public nuisance, the issue of limiting store hours shall be brought before a Council Committee appointed by the Mayor for consideration.

K. Housing Development projects located on Priority Housing Sites

1. Housing Development projects located on Priority Housing Sites identified to meet the lower income RHNA in the City’s Housing Element (Table HE 52), are required to be developed at a minimum density of 20 dwelling units per acre, and providing at least 20% of the total units in the development as affordable to lower income households are eligible for by-right approval as defined in Government Code Section 65583.2(i), which means that they are exempt from CEQA.

9 Section 4. Effective Date and Publication:Pursuant to the provisions of Government Code Section 36933, a summary of this Ordinance shall be prepared by the City Attorney. At least five (5) days prior to the Council meeting at which this Ordinance is scheduled to be adopted, the City Clerk shall (1) publish the summary, and (2) post in the City Clerk’s office a certified copy of this Ordinance. Within fifteen (15) days after the adoption of this ordinance, the City Clerk shall (1) publish the summary, and (2) post in the City Clerk’s office a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance along with the names of those City Council members voting for and against this ordinance or otherwise voting. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days from and after its adoption.

Section 5. Environmental Determination:The City Council approves the addendum to the General Plan EIR for this project and hereinafter finds that addendum to the General Plan EIR complies and conforms with the California Environmental Quality Act and the Guidelines implementing the Act.

Section 6. Severability: If any section, subsection or sentence of this Ordinance is found by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unlawful, the City Council finds and declares that the remainder of this Ordinance would be and is enforceable and would have been adopted notwithstanding the finding of invalidity as to any section, subsection or sentence.

Introduced this day of 2024.

Passed and adopted as an Ordinance of the City of Daly City at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Daly City held on the day of 2024, by the following vote:

AYES, Councilmembers
NOES, Councilmembers
ABSENT, Councilmembers:

CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF DALY CITY
APPROVED:

MAYOR OF THE CITY OF DALY CITY

1 ORDINANCE NO.

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DALY CITY

AMENDING THE DALY CITY ZONING MAP BY REZONING CERTAIN PARCELS LOCATED AT 1900 SULLIVAN AVENUE AND 1500 SOUTHGATE AVENUE, DALY CITY FROM SULLIVAN CORRIDOR – HOSPITAL (SC-HOSP) TO SULLIVAN CORRDIDOR RESIDENTAIL HIGH DENSITY (SC – R-H)
(APN’s 008-104-120. 008-104-110. 008-520-190, and 008-520-180) 1900 Sullivan Avenue Daly City
and
(APN 008-521-110 – 1500 Southgate Avenue)
BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Daly City as follows:

Section 1: Findings: The City Council of the City of Daly City finds that:

A. Following a public hearing duly and regularly conducted, the Planning Commission of the City of Daly City submitted to this City Council its recommendation with respect to the zoning amendment hereinafter described, accompanied by the report of the findings and a summary of its hearing, whereupon this City Council duly and regularly set this matter for hearing.

B. Due and regular notice of such hearing has been given as required by law and such hearing was regularly held by this City Council on October 14, 2024, all interested persons were heard and any additional evidence presented was received.

C. The City Council finds that the re-zoning from Sullivan Corridor – HOSP to Sullivan Corridor – Residential High Density (SC – R-H), would not be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort and general welfare of persons residing in or working in the neighborhood, or be injurious or detrimental to the property and improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the City of Daly City.

D. This City Council finds and declares that the health, safety, morals and general welfare of the City of Daly City requires that the real property hereinafter described be reclassified as provided herein.

E. The City Council has reviewed the proposal under the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined, that an addendum to the General Plan EIR is the appropriate environmental review. The Daly City Planning Commission and City staff recommend that an addendum to the General Plan EIR per CEQA Guidelines be adopted for this project.

F. The City Council approves the addendum to the General Plan EIR for this project and hereinafter finds that addendum to the General Plan EIR complies and conforms with the California Environmental Quality Act and the Guidelines implementing the Act.

Section 2: Zoning Reclassification:

The zoning as designated upon the “Official Zoning Map” of the City of Daly City, as adopted by Daly City Ordinance 635, and thereafter amended from time to time, is hereby changed as to the parcel or parcels identified on the attached Exhibit “A”, APNs 008-104-120. 008-104-110. 008- 520-190, 008-520-180 and 008-521-110), incorporated by this reference, and that in accordance

2 with Title 17 of the Daly City Municipal Code, the zoning for the real property hereinafter described is hereby amended so as to change the zone classification of the property from Sullivan Corridor – Hospitals (SC – HOSP) to Sullivan Corridor – Residential High Density (SC – R-H), as such zones are designated and defined by Ordinance 635, Daly City Municipal Code Title 17.

Section 3. Publication: This Ordinance shall be published according to law.

Section 4. Environmental Determination:The City Council approves the addendum to the General Plan EIR for this project and hereinafter finds that addendum to the General Plan EIR complies and conforms with the California Environmental Quality Act and the Guidelines implementing the Act.

Section 5. Severability: If any section, subsection or sentence of this Ordinance is found by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unlawful, the City Council finds and declares that the remainder of this Ordinance would be and is enforceable and would have been adopted notwithstanding the finding of invalidity as to any section, subsection or sentence.

Introduced this day of 2024.

Passed and adopted as an Ordinance of the City of Daly City at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Daly City held on the day of 2024, by the following vote:

AYES, Councilmembers
NOES, Councilmembers
ABSENT, Councilmembers:

CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF DALY CITY
APPROVED:

MAYOR OF THE CITY OF DALY CITY

City Council Meeting Agenda ReportItem # _____

Meeting Date: October 28,2024
Subject: Use Permit UPR-4-24-16495 — A&J Autobody Vehicle Storage 5951-5955 Mission Street
Recommended Action
Approve the Use Permit subject to the Findings and Conditions as outlined herein.

Planning Commission Discussion
On October 1, 2024, the Planning Commission voted 4-0 to recommend that the City Council approve Use Permit UPR-6-24-16495. Commissioner Nuris asked for clarification that the site be used only for storage and that no autobody or paint preparation or repair will be performed on site. Staff confirmed that vehicle storage would be the only use allowed on the site.

Background
The applicant, A&J Autobody, proposes to use the two adjacent vacant tenant spaces to store ten vehicles after the auto body work and painting for these vehicles is completed at their adjacent auto body shop located at 5900 Mission Street, San Francisco (see Attachment A – Site Location and Attachment B – Project Plans). The building has been vacant for several years, but was last used as a retail clothing store.

The proposed use includes nothing other than vehicle storage. No interior changes are proposed and the building will be used as-is.

Discussion
Vehicle storage is allowed in the Commercial Mixed Use (C-MU) zoning district subject to use permit approval. The purpose of the use permit is to ensure that the proposed use will not have an adverse effect on surrounding properties. The subject site has been vacant for a number of years.

A&J Autobody, an established autobody and repair business located across the street at 5900 Mission Street, San Francisco, would like to use the space to store the cars that have had completed repairs and are awaiting retrieval by their owners. The adjacent businesses on either side of the subject site are autobody repair and automotive window tinting.

Staff feels that the use of this site for vehicle storage would not adversely impact the neighboring business or the residences abutting the site to the rear. Several Conditions of Approval are recommended for adoption including a stipulation that no more than ten vehicles be stored in the subject building.

City Council Agenda Report
Use Permit UPR-4-24-16495 Page 2 of 4
5951-5955 Mission Street – A&J Autobody Vehicle Storage October 28, 2024

Environmental Review
The Planning Commission has reviewed the proposal under the requirement of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the project is exempt as an existing facility.

Findings
Approval of the proposed Use Permit UPR-4-24-16495, as conditioned herein, is in the best interest of the public health, safety, and general welfare of the community, and that the use of the site for vehicle storage will not adversely the surrounding business or residences. The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt findings based on the following facts:

1. In accordance with Title 17 of the Daly City Municipal Code, as well as applicable State zoning enabling legislation, the City Council will conducted a public hearing on October 28, 2024; notice of said hearing was by newspaper publication on October 17, 2024, and first class mailing to property owners within 300 feet;

2. The City Council has reviewed the proposal under the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined the project is Categorically Exempt per Section 15301, Existing Facilities;

3. The subject property is zoned C-MU (Commercial Mixed-Use) which requires a Use Permit for the vehicle storage;

4. The subject use is consistent with the General Plan and the C-MU standards and, together with the provisions for its design and operation, would not be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort and general welfare of the neighborhood; and Staff has added several Conditions of Approval to ensure that vehicle storage would not adversely impact neighboring businesses or the residences abutting the site to the rear.

Conditions of Approval
The Planning Commission recommends approval of Use Permit UPR-4-24-16495 based on the following conditions as specified by each Department and Division. These conditions need to be complied with prior to, or as part of, any building permit for the proposed improvements.

A. DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT –

PLANNING DIVISION

1. The occupancy of the subject building shall vehicle storage only, not exceeding ten vehicles. No repairing or washing vehicles is permitted, nor are vehicles sales or leasing.

2. All vehicles shall be stored inside the building. No exterior storage of any kind, including vehicle parts or any equipment, is permitted by this use permit.

City Council Agenda Report
Use Permit UPR-4-24-16495 Page 3 of 4
5951-5955 Mission Street – A&J Autobody Vehicle Storage October 28, 2024

3. Vehicles associated with the subject use that block the sidewalk shall be subject to tow and such continued activity shall be cause for revocation of this use permit.

4. Any change of such a use shall require approval by the Building Division, North County Fire Authority, and Department of Water and Wasterwater Resources.

5. The subject use shall commence within one year or the applicant shall file for a time extension.

6. Prior to occupancy, the applicant shall consult with the Building Division about which, if any, modifications to the building are required by the building code.

7. Violations of the building or fire code shall be considered violations of this use permit and shall be grounds for use permit revocation.

B.DEPARTMENT OF WATER/WASTEWATER RESOURCES

8. The drain in the rear yard shall be investigated and the discharge location determined.

9. A reduced pressure principle back flow device shall be installed on the water service. The RP device shall be installed on private property, not in the city right of way. The RP device shall be installed outside of the building.

10.Should the North County Fire Authority require sprinklers for this project, all of the following requirements shall apply:
a) A fire flow shall be obtained via the Daly City engineering department. b) A new fire service shall be required.
c) There is currently a 2 inch GI water main providing the domestic service to the property. This main is not large enough to provide flow for a fire suppression system.
d) Approximately 300 feet of new water main will need to be constructed to supply fire suppression to the property. This will be at the expense of the applicant. e) A reduced pressure principle detector assembly shall be required. f) A new fire hydrant will be required. The closest current fire hydrant is approximately 275 feet away,
g) An encroachment permit shall be required for the new fire service.

City Council Agenda Report
Use Permit UPR-4-24-16495 Page 4 of 4
5951-5955 Mission Street – A&J Autobody Vehicle Storage October 28, 2024

Recommendations
The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council do the following:

1. Adopt the Findings as outlined herein;

2. Affirm the project as Categorically Exempt per Section 15301 of the California Environmental Quality Act; and

3. Approve Use Permit UPR-4-24-16495, subject to the Findings and Conditions outlined herein.

Staff is available to provide any additional information desired by the Council members.

Respectfully submitted,

Brian Paland Tatum Mothershead
Assistant Planner Director of Economic and Community
Development
Attachments
Attachment A – Site Location
Attachment B – Project Narrative
Attachment C – Project Plans

SITE LOCATION

City Council Meeting Agenda ReportItem # _____

Meeting Date: October 28,2024
Subject: Use Permit UPR-6-24-16537 — Adult Day Care 6835 Mission Street Recommended Action
Approve the Use Permit subject to the Findings and Conditions as outlined herein.

Planning Commission Discussion
On October 1, 2024, the Planning Commission voted 4-0 to recommend that the City Council approve Use Permit UPR-6-24-16537. Marybeth Luciero spoke on behalf of the project.

Commissioner Faapuaa inquired about the age range of the participants. Ms. Luciero said participants would be age 18 and up. Commissioner Nuris if required licensing had been obtained and how participants were admitted into the program. Ms. Luciero answered that the state regulatory agency refers eligible participants and that priority is given to those living within 30 minutes of the facility. Licenses would only be issued after the site is confirmed.

Commissioner Catuar asked about the capacity and targeted opening date. The applicant responded that their proposed maximum number of participants is 35 and an estimated opening date in six to eight months. Commissioner Satorre expressed concerns over potential behavioral issues when the facility is integrated with a busy shopping center. The applicant responded that participants with behavioral issues would be referred to a different facility better equipped to handle adults with behavioral issues. She added that the participants referred to this facility would likely have medical or mobility disabilities.

Background
The applicant, M2GN Inc., proposes to use the 6,000 square foot vacant tenant space (formerly Kelly Moore paint store) at 6835 Mission Street as an adult day care, serving adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities (see Attachment A – Site Location). The facility would operate weekdays between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. (closed weekends), and would serve between 18 to 35 program participants (see Attachment B – Project Description and Attachment C – Project Plans).

Discussion
Although the PD-51 zoning requires retail uses in the Mission Plaza Shopping Center, the Zoning Ordinance allows uses other than those allowed in PD zones subject to use permit approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. This retail requirement was established when the center was constructed to ensure that the shopping center was economically vital and that retail users would interact with each other and together provide a greater range of goods and services to residents patronizing the center.

The Planning Division staff communicated this zoning limitation to the property owner in early conversations about potential users. While the owner spent a significant amount of time attempting

City Council Agenda Report
Use Permit UPR-6-24-16537 Page 2 of 4
6835 Mission Street – Adult Day Care October 28, 2024

to lease the building to a retail user, this effort was unsuccessful. For this reason, the Planning Division has been willing to consider the proposed non-retail use.

In consideration of the use permit, staff does not feel the proposed will have an adverse effect on surrounding properties. Transportation for program participants to and from the site and for community outings will be provided by staff in two accessible vans, which will be securely parked on-site when not in use. Staff for the facility, which is anticipated to be between ten and 18 adults would also park in the spaces immediately fronting the freestanding building. The parking demand created by the proposed use would be approximately the same as a retail use in the 6,000 square foot building (approximately 20 spaces would be required for a retail use).

Staff is therefore recommending approval of proposed use subject to the applicant obtaining a building permit for any improvements to the retail space that may be necessary to accommodate the building code occupancy classification of the proposed use.

Environmental Review
The Planning Commission has reviewed the proposal under the requirement of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the project is exempt as an existing facility.

Findings
On October 1, 2024, the Planning Commission found that approval of the proposed Use Permit UPR-6-24-16537, as conditioned herein, is in the best interest of the public health, safety, and general welfare of the community, and that the general operation of the facility will not be detrimental to the operation of the neighboring business or residences. The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt findings based on the following facts:

1. In accordance with Title 17 of the Daly City Municipal Code, as well as applicable State zoning enabling legislation, the City Council conducted a public hearing on October 28, 2024; notice of said hearing was by newspaper publication on October 18, 2024, and first class mailing to property owners within 300 feet;

2. Although the PD-51 zoning requires retail uses in the Mission Plaza Shopping Center, the Zoning Ordinance allows uses other than those allowed in PD zones subject to use permit approval by the Planning Commission and City Council.

3. The property owner spent a significant amount of time attempting to lease the building to a retail user and this effort has been unsuccessful.

4. In consideration of allowing the property owner to economically benefit from the subject property, consideration of a non-retail use is before the City Council.

5. The proposed will not have an adverse effect on surrounding properties. The City Council has reviewed the proposed business plan submitted for the proposed use and the use appears

City Council Agenda Report
Use Permit UPR-6-24-16537 Page 3 of 4
6835 Mission Street – Adult Day Care October 28, 2024

to have no unconventional impacts that would have otherwise not been present had a retail user occupied that space.

6. The City Council has reviewed the proposal under the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined the project is Categorically Exempt per Section 15301, Existing Facilities;

7. The subject use is consistent with the General Plan and the PD-51 standards and, together with the provisions for its design and operation, would not be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort and general welfare of the neighborhood;

Conditions of Approval
The Planning Commission recommends approval of Use Permit UPR- 06-24-16537 based on the following conditions as specified by each Department and Division. These conditions need to be complied with prior to, or as part of, any building permit for the proposed improvements.

A. DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
General

1. The Use Permit shall be valid for a period of one year from the date of City Council approval.

The approval shall terminate if a building permit has not been obtained and construction commenced within one-year of City Council approval of the project or if the applicant fails to obtain a valid business license.

2. The Use Permit shall be valid only in conjunction with plans submitted and approved by the City Council. Any significant modifications and changes to the plans shall be treated as an amendment and shall be subject to review by a Council Committee appointed by the Mayor.

3. The City shall reserve the right to revisit and review Use Permit UPR-06-24-16537 the onsite prevailing conditions periodically to ascertain that no adverse impacts are being generated by the business operations in the area and along the surrounding City streets.

Signs

4. All signs at the subject property shall receive sign permits and shall remain in conformance with the Daly City Municipal Code. Banners, streamers, balloons, and any other device intended to attract visual attention shall be prohibited. Box signs shall be prohibited, except where allowed on the monument and pole sign.

5. Illuminated wall and monument signs facing parcels with residential uses shall be halo- illuminated only.

6. Any modifications to the proposed monument sign and any other signs shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Division prior to sign permit issuance. A separate sign permit shall be required for all proposed signage.

City Council Agenda Report
Use Permit UPR-6-24-16537 Page 4 of 4
6835 Mission Street – Adult Day Care October 28, 2024

B. BUILDING DIVISION

7. The applicant shall provide a full set of stamped drawings from a licensed CA Architect to the Building Division for review and permit issuance. The plans shall include a consultation with a CA Professional Engineer for the chance of occupancy code requirements.

Recommendations
The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council do the following:

1. Adopt the Findings as outlined herein;

2. Affirm the project as Categorically Exempt per Section 15301 of the California Environmental Quality Act; and

3. Approve Use Permit UPR-06-24-16537, subject to the Findings and Conditions outlined herein.

Staff is available to provide any additional information desired by the Council members.

Respectfully submitted,

Brian Paland Tatum Mothershead
Assistant Planner Director of Economic and Community
Development
Attachments
Attachment A – Site Location
Attachment B – Project Narrative
Attachment C – Project Plans

SITE LOCATION



DALY CITY ADULT DAY

CARE PROGRAM
6835 MISSION ST, DALY CITY, CA 94104 USE PERMIT APPLICATION Please call for any questions: DĂƌŝďĞƚŚ>ƵĐĞƌŽ͕WƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚŵĂƌŝďĞƚŚΛŶĂƌĂƐŽů͘ŽƌŐϲϱϬͲϴϲϲͲϵϯϲϳ dŚĞďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐĐƵƌƌĞŶƚůLJƵŶĚĞƌ
ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͕ŝƐĂĐŽŵƉƌĞŚĞŶƐŝǀĞ
ĂĚƵůƚĚĂLJĐĂƌĞƐĞƌǀŝĐĞĚĞĚŝĐĂƚĞĚƚŽ
ĞŶƌŝĐŚŝŶŐƚŚĞůŝǀĞƐŽĨŝŶĚŝǀŝĚƵĂůƐǁŝƚŚ
/ŶƚĞůůĞĐƚƵĂůĂŶĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚĂů
ŝƐĂďŝůŝƚŝĞƐ;/Ϳ͘KƵƌŵŝƐƐŝŽŶŝƐƚŽ
ĨŽƐƚĞƌĂŶĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚƚŚĂƚ
ƉƌŽŵŽƚĞƐŝŶĚĞƉĞŶĚĞŶĐĞ͕ƉĞƌƐŽŶĂů
ŐƌŽǁƚŚ͕ĂŶĚĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJŝŶƚĞŐƌĂƚŝŽŶ
ĨŽƌŽƵƌƉĂƌƚŝĐŝƉĂŶƚƐ͘

KƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶĂů,ŽƵƌƐ͗
DŽŶĚĂLJƚŽ&ƌŝĚĂLJ͗ϴ͗ϬϬDͲϰ͗ϬϬ
WD
tĞĞŬĞŶĚƐΘ^ĞůĞĐƚĞĚ,ŽůŝĚĂLJƐ͗
ůŽƐĞĚ
ĂƉĂĐŝƚLJ͗
WĂƌƚŝĐŝƉĂŶƚƐ͗ϭϴƚŽϯϱĚĂŝůLJ
^ƚĂĨĨ͗ϭϬƚŽϭϴĚĂŝůLJ
dƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ͗
ĐĐĞƐƐŝďůĞsĂŶƐ͗ϮŚĂŶĚŝĐĂƉƉĞĚͲĂĐĐĞƐƐŝďůĞǀĂŶƐĨŽƌƐĂĨĞĂŶĚĐŽŵĨŽƌƚĂďůĞ ƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶ͘
,ŽŵĞWŝĐŬͲƵƉ͗ĞƚǁĞĞŶϴ͗ϭϱDͲϵ͗ϭϱD
,ŽŵĞƌŽƉͲŽĨĨ͗ĞƚǁĞĞŶϮ͗ϬϬWDͲϯ͗ϯϬWD
ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJKƵƚŝŶŐƐ͗sĂŶƐƵƚŝůŝnjĞĚĨŽƌƚƌŝƉƐƚŽƉĂƌŬƐ͕ŵĂůůƐ͕ĂŶĚŐƌŽĐĞƌLJƐƚŽƌĞƐ͘ WĂƌŬŝŶŐ͗sĂŶƐĂƌĞƐĞĐƵƌĞůLJƉĂƌŬĞĚŽǀĞƌŶŝŐŚƚ͕ŽŶǁĞĞŬĞŶĚƐ͕ĂŶĚŚŽůŝĚĂLJƐ͘ 
^ƵƉƉŽƌƚ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ͗
x ĂƚŚƌŽŽŵƐƐŝƐƚĂŶĐĞ͗^ĐŚĞĚƵůĞĚĞǀĞƌLJϮŚŽƵƌƐĂŶĚĂǀĂŝůĂďůĞĂƐ ŶĞĞĚĞĚ͘
x KƉĞŶŽŽƌWŽůŝĐLJ͗&ĂŵŝůLJŵĞŵďĞƌƐĂŶĚƐŽĐŝĂůǁŽƌŬĞƌƐĂƌĞǁĞůĐŽŵĞ ƚŽǀŝƐŝƚĨƌŽŵϵ͗ϯϬDƚŽϮ͗ϯϬWD͘
ĂŝůLJĐƚŝǀŝƚŝĞƐ͗
x ϴ͗ϯϬDͲϵ͗ϬϬD͗DŽƌŶŝŶŐĂƐƐĞŵďůLJǁŝƚŚĂŶŶŽƵŶĐĞŵĞŶƚƐŝŶǀŽůǀŝŶŐ ĂůůƉƌĞƐĞŶƚƉĂƌƚŝĐŝƉĂŶƚƐĂŶĚƐƚĂĨĨ͘
x ϵ͗ϬϬDͲϭϬ͗ϬϬD͗
ŶŐĂŐŝŶŐĂĐƚŝǀŝƚŝĞƐƐƵĐŚĂƐĚƌĂǁŝŶŐ͕ĞdžĞƌĐŝƐĞ
ƌŽƵƚŝŶĞƐ͕ƐƉĂƚƌĞĂƚŵĞŶƚƐ͕ĂŶĚƚĂďůĞƚŽƉŐĂŵĞƐ͘
x ϭϬ͗ϬϬDͲϭϭ͗ϬϬD͗^ŶĂĐŬƚŝŵĞǁŝƚŚĂƐƐŝƐƚĂŶĐĞƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚďLJƐƚĂĨĨ͘ x ϭϭ͗ϬϬDͲϭϮ͗ϬϬWD͗/ŶƚĞƌĂĐƚŝǀĞƐĞƐƐŝŽŶƐŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐĐŽŽŬŝŶŐ͕ďĂŬŝŶŐ͕ ĚŝƐĐƵƐƐŝŶŐĐƵƌƌĞŶƚĞǀĞŶƚƐ͕ĂŶĚŬƌĞĂĚŝŶŐ͘
x ϭϮ͗ϬϬWDͲϭ͗ϬϬWD͗>ƵŶĐŚďƌĞĂŬǁŝƚŚŽƉƚŝŽŶƐƚŽĞŶũŽLJƐĞůĨͲĐŽŽŬĞĚ ŵĞĂůƐ͕ŚŽŵĞͲďƌŽƵŐŚƚĨŽŽĚ͕ŽƌĞdžƚĞƌŶĂůĐĂƚĞƌŝŶŐ͘
x ϭ͗ϬϬWDͲϮ͗ϯϬWD͗
ŶƚĞƌƚĂŝŶŵĞŶƚĂŶĚƉŚLJƐŝĐĂůĂĐƚŝǀŝƚŝĞƐůŝŬĞŵŽǀŝĞ
ƐĐƌĞĞŶŝŶŐƐĂŶĚďĂƐŬĞƚďĂůů
x Ϯ͗ϯϬWDͲϯ͗ϯϬWD͗&ůĞdžŝďůĞĂĐƚŝǀŝƚLJƚŝŵĞďĂƐĞĚŽŶƉĂƌƚŝĐŝƉĂŶƚ ƉƌĞĨĞƌĞŶĐĞƵŶƚŝůƉŝĐŬͲƵƉ͘
&ĂĐŝůŝƚLJŽŵƉůŝĂŶĐĞĂŶĚ>ŝĐĞŶƐŝŶŐŝƐĐůŽƐƵƌĞ
dŚĞEĞǁĂLJƉƌŽŐƌĂŵŝƐĐŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĚƚŽŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŶŐŝŶĨƵůůĐŽŵƉůŝĂŶĐĞǁŝƚŚĂůůĂƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞůŽĐĂů͕ƐƚĂƚĞ͕ĂŶĚĨĞĚĞƌĂůƌĞŐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐ͘tĞĂƌĞŝŶƚŚĞƉƌŽĐĞƐƐŽĨŽďƚĂŝŶŝŶŐĂůů ŶĞĐĞƐƐĂƌLJƉĞƌŵŝƚƐĂŶĚůŝĐĞŶƐĞƐƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚƚŽƐĞƌǀĞŝŶĚŝǀŝĚƵĂůƐǁŝƚŚ/ŶƚĞůůĞĐƚƵĂůĂŶĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚĂůŝƐĂďŝůŝƚŝĞƐ͘ KƵƌĨĂĐŝůŝƚLJǁŝůůĂĚŚĞƌĞƚŽƚŚĞƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐƐĞƚĨŽƌƚŚďLJƚŚĞĂƉƉƌŽƉƌŝĂƚĞůŝĐĞŶƐŝŶŐĂŐĞŶĐŝĞƐƚŽĞŶƐƵƌĞƚŚĞŚŝŐŚĞƐƚůĞǀĞůŽĨƐĂĨĞƚLJĂŶĚƋƵĂůŝƚLJŝŶƚŚĞƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐǁĞƉƌŽǀŝĚĞ͘tĞ ƉůĞĚŐĞƚŽŵĂŝŶƚĂŝŶƚƌĂŶƐƉĂƌĞŶĐLJŝŶŽƵƌŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƐĂŶĚƚŽŬĞĞƉŽƵƌƐƚĂĨĨ͕ƉĂƌƚŝĐŝƉĂŶƚƐ͕ĂŶĚƚŚĞŝƌĨĂŵŝůŝĞƐŝŶĨŽƌŵĞĚŽĨŽƵƌĐŽŵƉůŝĂŶĐĞƐƚĂƚƵƐ͘ &ŽƌĨƵƌƚŚĞƌĚĞƚĂŝůƐŽŶŽƵƌůŝĐĞŶƐŝŶŐĂŶĚƌĞŐƵůĂƚŽƌLJĂĚŚĞƌĞŶĐĞ͕ƉůĞĂƐĞĐŽŶƚĂĐƚŽƵƌĚĞƐŝŐŶĂƚĞĚƌĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƚŝǀĞ͗

City Council Agenda ReportItem # _____
Meeting Date: October 28, 2024
Subject: Award of Construction Contract for the Skyline Slurry Seal & Westmoor Avenue and Westridge Avenue Intersections Quick Build Project Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Approve the design documents for the Skyline Slurry Seal & Westmoor Avenue and Westridge Avenue Intersections Quick Build Project;

2. Affirm the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) determination of Categorical Exemption;

3. Accept all responsive bids and award a construction contract for Bid Schedule A and Bid Schedule B to VSS International, Inc. of West Sacramento, California, in the amount of $3,516,784.75; and

4. Authorize the City Manager to execute all necessary contracts to complete the project.

Background
Since 1998, Daly City Public Works has undertaken a comprehensive street pavement preventative maintenance program. The “cornerstone” of this program is an annual Street Slurry Seal Project as the single most cost-effective means to preserve a pavement’s condition and thereby reduce long term pavement operations and maintenance cost. Street slurry sealing replaces fine aggregate stripped from the pavement surface, reduces water penetration in the roadway base and thereby reduces base failures and the resultant damage that is more costly to repair. Streets selected to be surface sealed are based on several factors including the City’s Seven-Year Master Plan, the City’s computer-based pavement management system recommendations, visual observation of the streets by Public Works staff and other upcoming or associated work such as utility repairs and bike lane installations.

In May 2022, staff submitted an application for the Westmoor Avenue and Westridge Avenue Intersections Quick Build Project. The City’s application requested $168,000 in grant funds for the project. In July 2022, the San Mateo County Transportation Authority selected Daly City’s project for grant funding in the full requested amount of $168,000.

In January 2023, City Council accepted and appropriated $168,000 of Measure W grant funds from the San Mateo County Transportation Authority’s Congestion Relief and Transportation Demand Management Program for the Westmoor Avenue and Westridge Avenue Intersections Quick Build Project. City Council also authorized the appropriation of $17,000 of unallocated Measure A funds to cover the City’s required local match. The goal of the program is to encourage the use of sustainable transportation options and enhance mobility across San Mateo County.

The construction bid documents include slurry sealing approximately 12.5 miles of City streets in the Skyline Drive area while the Westmoor Avenue and Westridge Avenue Intersections Quick Build Project will install striping to channelize vehicular traffic to improve pedestrian crossings along Westmoor Avenue from Avalon Drive to Southgate Avenue and along Westridge Avenue from Skyline Drive to Southgate Avenue. See attached location map.

The purpose of the Skyline Slurry Seal & Westmoor Avenue and Westridge Avenue Intersections Quick Build Project is to slurry seal approximately 12.5 miles of City streets in the Skyline Drive area to extend the useful

Award of Construction Contract for the Skyline Slurry Seal & Westmoor Avenue and Westridge Avenue Intersections Quick Build Project Meeting Date: October 28, 2024

life of the pavement and install traffic striping, pavement markings and new painted curb extensions along Westmoor Avenue and Westridge Avenue to enhance pedestrian crossing at designated intersections along the two corridors.

Discussion
The construction bid documents were prepared in-house by the Engineering Staff with the help of Engineering interns. The project was advertised on July 21, 2024, and three (3) bids were received on August 14, 2024 with total bids ranging from $3,516,784.75 to $3,726,362.00. Determination of the lowest responsible bidder was based on the lowest combined total of Bid Schedule A and Bid Schedule B. The bids and the Engineer’s Estimate are summarized as follows:

Bidder Bid
Schedule A
Bid
Schedule B
Total Sum of Bid
Schedule A and
Bid Schedule B
Comments

1. VSS International, Inc. $3,103,450.40 $413,334.35 $3,516,784.75 Responsive Bid

2. O’Grady Paving, Inc. $3,295,069.50 $418,770.25 $3,713,839.75 Non-
Responsive
Bid

3. Pavement Coatings Co. $3,240,892.50 $485,469.50 $3,726,362.00 Responsive Bid
Engineer’s Estimate $3,197,506.00 $107,011.75 $3,304,517.75 VSS International, Inc. of West Sacramento, California, has been in business since 1974. This bidder holds the required Class A contractor’s license, which is current and in good standing. The contractor’s references for work performed for other public agencies are acceptable including the County of San Mateo and City of Vacaville. The contractor also successfully completed Daly City’s 2020-21 Serramonte Slurry Seal & Daly City Crosswalk Enhancement project in 2022.

The low bid for this project is 6.4% higher than the Engineer’s estimated cost which is based on unit prices received from last year’s slurry seal project.

If Bid Schedule A and Bid Schedule B are awarded as recommended, construction is anticipated to commence in November 2024 and be completed in May 2025.

Fiscal Impact
The total estimated construction cost for the Skyline Slurry Seal & Westmoor Avenue and Westridge Avenue Intersections Quick Build Project is $4,166,784.75, which includes the $3,516,784.75 construction contract and $650,000.00 (18.5%) for construction contingency, inspection and administration. $3,383,224.59 is available in Transportation Fund CIP project accounts 17-312-620 – Skyline Slurry Seal and 17-312-697 – Westmoor Avenue and Westridge Avenue Intersections Quick Build, Sanitation Fund project account 87-920-617 and Water fund project account 41-385-617. An additional $783,560.16 above the