Table of Contents
6-16-2026 Regular Meeting Agenda
Item 3 - Minutes
Item 4 - 6.16.26 List of Demands Packet
Item 6 - KLF Amendment 9
Item 7 - Sewer Line Root Control Contract Award
Item 8 - First Amendment MOE Agreement
Item 9 - DMVA Agreements
Item 10 - First Amendment DMCC Senior Support Services
Item 11 - First Amendment Adam Kaye Communications
Item 12 - FY26-27 Budget Update Adoption
Item 13 - Affordable Housing Concepts for Overlay Zone
Item 14 - FY 26-27 Advisory Committee Work Plans
Item 15 - Revisit Bike and E-Bike Regulations
Item 16 - Traffic and Parking Advisory Committee Appointment 2 9
15 20
216
249
269
297
314
330
390
487
529
534
Del Mar City Council Meeting Agenda
City of Del Mar, Town Hall
1050 Camino del Mar, Del Mar, California 92014
1050 Camino del Mar, Del Mar, CA 92014 www.delmar.ca.us Civility Works: The Del Mar Code of Civil Discourse: Together we will promote inclusion; listen to understand; show respect; be clear and fair; and focus on the issue.
Regular Meeting
Tuesday, June 16, 2026 at 4:30 PM
Public Participation/Comment: Members of the public can participate in City Council meetings in-person or via written comment (Red Dot). Anyone may address the City Council for up to three minutes, at the Mayor’s discretion, on items on the agenda.
Members of the public wishing to speak on items not on the agenda may do so under Public Oral Communications. Agenda items may be addressed in any order at the discretion of the Mayor. When addressing the Council, please state your name for the record. Any electronic presentations must be received before 9 a.m. on the date of the Council meeting. No PowerPoint presentations can be loaded during the meeting.
In-Person Participation: Please submit a completed “Speaker Slip”, including the item number you wish to speak on, to the City Clerk prior to the Mayor announcing the agenda item. The forms are located near the door at the rear of the Meeting Room. When called to speak, please approach the podium and state your name for the record.
Written Comments: Members of the public can participate in the meeting by submitting a written red dot comment via email to [email protected]. The deadline to submit written comments is 12 p.m. on the day of the meeting and the subject line of your email should clearly state the agenda item you are commenting on.
Viewing the Meeting and Access to Agenda Materials: Members of the public can watch the meeting live on the City’s website at: http://delmar.12milesout.com/Video/Live and on Cable TV Spectrum Ch. 24, AT&T Ch. 99 starting at 4:30 PM. Agenda materials and communications from the public on agenda items, “Red Dots”, are available on the City’s website:
http://www.delmar.ca.us/AgendaCenter and a hard copy of the agenda materials are available at Del Mar City Hall and the Del Mar Library during their business hours.
Assistance for Persons with Disabilities: In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the Administrative Services Department at 1050 Camino del Mar or by calling (858) 755-9313.
Notification of at least 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting.
Tracy Martinez
Mayor
John W. Spelich
Deputy Mayor
Terry Gaasterland
Council Member
Dan Quirk
Council Member
Ashley Jones
City Manager
Christina Cameron
City Attorney
Sarah Krietor
Administrative Services
Manager/City Clerk
Del Mar City Council Regular Meeting June 16, 2026
Agenda Page 2
1050 Camino del Mar, Del Mar, CA 92014 www.delmar.ca.us I. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL
II. CITY ATTORNEY CLOSED SESSION REPORT
III. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
IV. PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Each person wishing to speak before the City Council on any matter not on the agenda shall submit a “Speaker Slip” to the City Clerk when Public Oral Communication is announced. Each speaker will have up to three (3) minutes to speak at the discretion of the Mayor and may be asked clarifying questions. Information received during Public Oral Communication may be received, placed on a future agenda, or referred to the City Manager by the City Council. State law generally precludes the City Council from discussing or acting upon any topic presented during oral communications that is not described on the posted agenda.
Note: there is a time limit of 30 minutes for this section of public communications and each speaker will be heard in the order of the submission of their speaker slip. Speakers who have turned in a speaker slip prior to the time oral communications was called on the agenda, but were not heard during the initial time period shall be called to speak at the end of the agenda.
V. COMMUNITY ANNOUNCEMENTS
VI. CITY MANAGER’S REPORT
VII. PRESENTATIONS
1. Proclamation for Shawna Anderson (San Dieguito River Park Joint Powers Authority CEO)
Recommended Action: Mayor Tracy Martinez will present a proclamation honoring San Dieguito River Park Joint Powers Authority Chief Operations Officer Shawna Anderson’s retirement and notable contributions to the Del Mar Community.
Reference: Clerk’s File No. 1201-5
2. Proclamation for Patrick Giannetto (Retired Del Mar Fire Captain) Recommended Action: Mayor Tracy Martinez will present a proclamation celebrating the late Fire Captain Patrick Giannetto’s life and honoring his service to the Del Mar Fire Department.
Reference: Clerk’s File No. 1201-5
Del Mar City Council Regular Meeting June 16, 2026
Agenda Page 3
1050 Camino del Mar, Del Mar, CA 92014 www.delmar.ca.us VIII. CONSENT CALENDAR
All items listed on the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and will be acted upon with one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a member of the City Council or the public so requests, in which event, the item will be pulled from the Consent Calendar and considered separately after the motion to approve the Consent Calendar. If you wish to remove an item from the Consent Calendar, please submit a “Speaker Slip” to the City Clerk.
3. Approval of Minutes: June 2, 2026 Regular and Special Meeting Recommended Action: Approve Minutes.
Reference: Clerk’s Minutes Book
4. Ratification of List of Demands dated June 16, 2026
Recommended Action: Ratify the List of Demands.
Reference: Clerk’s File No. 201-3
5. Waiver of Reading of Ordinances on Agenda
Recommended Action: Waive Reading of Ordinances.
Reference: Clerk’s File No. 401-4
6. Ninth Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with Kleinfelder, Inc. for the Camino Del Mar Bridge Replacement Project
Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council: 1) Approve the Ninth Amendment (Attachment A) to the Professional Services Agreement with Kleinfelder, Inc. for engineering design services for the Camino Del Mar Bridge Replacement Project; and 2) Authorize the City Manager to execute the Ninth Amendment.
Reference: Clerk’s File No. 406-1
7. Sewer Pipeline Root Control Services Contract Award
Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council: 1) Approve an agreement with Duke’s Root Control, Inc. (Attachment A) to provide sewer line root control services; and 2) Authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement.
Reference: Clerk’s File No. 406-1
Del Mar City Council Regular Meeting June 16, 2026
Agenda Page 4
1050 Camino del Mar, Del Mar, CA 92014 www.delmar.ca.us
8. First Amendment to Agreement with Mikhail Ogawa Engineering, Inc. for Clean Water Program Management Services
Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council: 1) Approve the First Amendment to the Agreement with Mikhail Ogawa Engineering, Inc. (Attachment A) for Clean Water Program Management services, extending the term for an additional two-year period ending June 30, 2028, and adjusting fees for inflation; and 2) Authorize the City Manager to execute the Amendment.
Reference: Clerk’s File No. 406-1
9. Professional Service Agreements with the Del Mar Village Association for Economic Development and Business Support and Destination Marketing Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council: 1) Approve Agreements with the Del Mar Village Association for Economic Development and Business Support Services (Attachment A) and Destination Marketing Services (Attachment B); and 2) Authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreements.
Reference: Clerk’s File No. 406-1, 1202-16
10. First Amendment to Agreement with Del Mar Community Connections for Senior Support Services
Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council: 1) Approve the First Amendment to the Agreement between the City of Del Mar and Del Mar Community Connections (DMCC) for senior support services (Attachment A) to extend the term for an additional two-year period ending June 30, 2028, and adjust the scope of services and compensation; and 2) Authorize the City Manager to execute the First Amendment.
Reference: Clerk’s File No. 406-1, 1202-15
11. First Amendment to Communications Consultant Services Agreement Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council: 1) Approve the First Amendment to the Agreement with Adam Kaye Communications (Attachment A) for as-needed public information, communications, and outreach services, extending the term for an additional two-year period ending June 30, 2028; and 2) Authorize the City Manager to execute the First Amendment.
Reference: Clerk’s File No. 406-1
IX. COUNCIL MEETING RECESS
Del Mar City Council Regular Meeting June 16, 2026
Agenda Page 5
1050 Camino del Mar, Del Mar, CA 92014 www.delmar.ca.us X. CITY COUNCIL OTHER BUSINESS
12. Adoption of the Fiscal Year 2026-27 Budget Update
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council review the proposed update to the Fiscal Year 2026-27 Operating and Capital Budget and take the following actions:
1. Adopt a Resolution Amending the Fiscal Years 2025-26 and 2026-27 Operating and Capital Budget (Attachment A);
2. Adopt a Resolution Adopting the Compensation Plans for the Management and Professional, General, Fire, and Miscellaneous, Part Time, Temporary and Hourly Employees for Fiscal Year 2026-27, and Authorizing reclassification of Finance Manager position to Finance Director (Attachment B);
3. Adopt a Resolution Establishing the Fixed Charge Assessments for Bonded Indebtedness for Fiscal Year 2026-27 (Attachment C);
4. Adopt a Resolution Establishing the Appropriations Limit for Fiscal Year 2026- 27 (Attachment D);
5. Adopt a Resolution Setting User Fee Schedule effective July 1, 2026 (Attachment E); and,
6. Adopt a Resolution Setting Parking Violation Schedule effective July 1, 2026 (Attachment F).
13. Review of Affordable Housing Concepts and City Council Direction on Initiation of an Affordable Housing Overlay Zone (6th Cycle Housing Element Programs 1D and 1I)
Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council review the consultant report (Attachment A) and provide direction to staff to initiate amendments to the Del Mar Zoning Code and Local Coastal Program, and complete analysis in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), to create a new overlay zone and incentives to facilitate affordable housing development consistent with 6th Cycle Housing Element Program 1D and 1I.
Reference: Clerk’s File No. 303-1, 304-7
14. Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Advisory Committee Work Plans Recommended Action: Staff requests that the City Council: 1) Review the proposed Fiscal Year (FY) 2026-2027 work plans for the City’s advisory committees (Attachment A); 2) Consider the work plan recommendations provided by staff included in Attachment B; and 3) Provide direction to staff as may be needed to approve the FY 2026-2027 advisory committee work plans.
Reference: Clerk’s File No. 401-5
Del Mar City Council Regular Meeting June 16, 2026
Agenda Page 6
1050 Camino del Mar, Del Mar, CA 92014 www.delmar.ca.us
15. Amendment to the Fiscal Year 2026-2027 City Council Work Plan to Revisit Bicycle and Electric Bicycle Regulations
Recommended Action: Mayor Martinez and Deputy Mayor Spelich recommend that the City Council amend the Fiscal Year 2026-2027 City Work Plan to add an item directing staff to research potential amendments to the Del Mar Municipal Code related to bicycle and electric bicycle regulations and return to the City Council with any proposed changes to the City’s existing regulations.
Reference: Clerk’s File No. 401-1
16. Traffic and Parking Advisory Committee Appointment
Recommended Action: The City Council liaisons to the Traffic and Parking Advisory Committee (TPAC) are seeking direction from the City Council to either proceed with an appointment to TPAC or extend the application period to solicit additional interest.
Reference: Clerk’s File No. 401-5
XI. REGIONAL ORGANIZATION REPORTS
A Councilmember assigned as a liaison to a regional organization may make a written or oral report. State law precludes the Council from commenting on, discussing, or acting on a report unless the item of business within the report is described in the agenda.
A. Clean Energy Alliance JPA (CEA) Board of Directors (Spelich/Gaasterland) B. CSA-17 Ambulance District Advisory Board (Martinez)
C. Fire Governance Board, Solana Beach/Del Mar/Encinitas (Martinez/Spelich) D. League of California Cities – San Diego Chapter (Martinez/Spelich) E. North County Transit District (NCTD) (Martinez/Spelich) F. Regional Solid Waste Association (Spelich/Quirk)
G. San Diego Association of Governments Board (SANDAG)
(Gaasterland/Martinez/Spelich)
H. SANDAG Borders Committee (Gaasterland)
I. SANDAG Regional Planning Committee (Martinez)
J. SANDAG Shoreline Preservation Working Group
(Gaasterland/Spelich/Martinez)
K. SANDAG LOSSAN Executive Task Force (Gaasterland/Martinez) L. San Diego Metropolitan Wastewater Commission/JPA (Worden) M. San Dieguito River Valley Regional Open Space Park JPA –Executive Committee (Gaasterland/Martinez)
N. Other Regional Organization Reports
XII. COUNCIL COMMITTEES/SUBCOMMITTEES/COMMUNITY ORG REPORTS A Councilmember assigned as a liaison to a City Committee, Council Subcommittee OR Community Organization may make a written or oral report. State law precludes the Del Mar City Council Regular Meeting June 16, 2026
Agenda Page 7
1050 Camino del Mar, Del Mar, CA 92014 www.delmar.ca.us Council from commenting on, discussing, or acting on a report, unless the item of business within the report is described in this agenda.
A. Civic Center Operations Guide Subcommittee (Spelich/Gaasterland) B. Del Mar Community Connections (Martinez/Spelich)
C. Del Mar Village Association (Gaasterland/Martinez)
D. Finance Committee (Spelich)
E. Housing Subcommittee (Gaasterland/Martinez)
F. Human Resources Subcommittee (Gaasterland/Martinez)
G. Legislative Subcommittee (Martinez/Spelich)
H. Measure Q Citizen Oversight Committee (Quirk/Gaasterland) I. Parks and Recreation Committee (Martinez/Quirk)
J. Del Mar Railroad Subcommittee (Gaasterland/Martinez) K. Lagoon Committee (Spelich)
L. Planning Process Subcommittee (Includes Sea-Level Rise Adaptation Plan Implementation (Gaasterland/Spelich)
M. Shores Park Master Plan Ad-Hoc Advisory Committee (Gaasterland/Spelich) N. Sustainability Advisory Committee (Martinez/Gaasterland) O. Traffic and Parking Advisory Committee (Quirk/Spelich) P. Undergrounding Program Advisory Committee (Spelich/Martinez) Q. Other Committee-Subcommittee Reports
XIII. UPCOMING AGENDA ITEMS
The following topics/items are tentatively planned for upcoming agendas. The title, wording, and planned date for these items are subject to change. Final agendas are posted at City Hall 72 hours in advance of the meetings and are also posted on our web site with the accompanying staff report. Please watch our web site: www.delmar.ca.us for City Council Agendas.
July 7, 2026
Proclamation for the 50th Anniversary of Community Plan Right of Way Approvals for CDM Bridge & Project Update
Jimmy Durante Boulevard Bluff Task Order Amendment and Project Contingency Increase Conflict of Interest Code Bi-annual Update
Undergrounding Program Updates
Streetlight Policy Considerations for Beach Colony (2) and 25th Street Utility Undergrounding Districts
XIV. CERTIFICATION
I, Kseniia Izgarskaia, Senior Management Analyst for the City of Del Mar, hereby certify that a copy of this agenda was posted at City Hall on the 10th day of June, 2026 at approximately 5:00 p.m.
___________________________________________ 6/10/2026
Kseniia Izgarskaia, Senior Management Analyst
CITY OF DEL MAR
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
JUNE 2, 2026
City of Del Mar Town Hall
1050 Camino del Mar, Del Mar California 92014
The minutes set forth the actions taken by the City Council on the matters stated. Audio/video recordings of the City Council proceedings are retained for a period of ten years, in accordance with the City's Records Retention Schedule. Audio/video recordings, as well as written materials presented to the City Council, including Red Dots (materials provided to the City Council after the agenda has published), are available on the City’s website at www.delmar.ca.us/AgendaCenter or by contacting the Administrative Services Department at (858) 755-9313.
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Tracy Martinez called the Regular Meeting to order at 4:30 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Present: Mayor Tracy Martinez; Deputy Mayor John Spelich; Councilmembers Terry Gaasterland (arrived at 4:43 p.m.) and Dan Quirk
CITY ATTORNEY CLOSED SESSION REPORT
City Attorney Christina Cameron reported that there were no reportable actions following Closed Session.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Martinez led the Pledge of Allegiance.
PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Mayor Martinez opened public oral communications and the following people spoke:
1) Deborah Newmark
2) Jerry Rost
3) Carol Kerridge
4) Sharon Hsia
Mayor Martinez closed public oral communications.
CITY COUNCIL COMMUNITY ANNOUNCEMENTS
Mayor Martinez reported on a successful Del Mar Fire Push-In event at the Del Mar Fire Station, which included many staff and community members, to dedicate the new fire engine on Sunday, May 31, 2026.
CITY MANAGER’S REPORT
City Manager Ashley Jones reported on the City’s recognition by the Clean Energy Alliance (CEA) as a Green Energy Champion and congratulated the CEA on its five-year anniversary.
PRESENTATIONS
ITEM 1: 2025 PUBLIC SAFETY RECAP (CLERK’S FILE NO. 1101-2, 1503-19) A presentation was provided by San Diego Sheriff Captain Shane Watts.
City Council questions focused on the Sheriff’s proactive approach to enforcement; additional actions the City could consider related to bicycle and pedestrian safety; whether communities use cameras for 1 June 16, 2026 Item 3
City Council Regular Minutes
June 2, 2026
enforcement; how residents should handle it if they observe e-bike riders violating traffic rules; where the Sheriff distributes and shares materials regarding e-bike safety; and whether the City has a Sheriff traffic motor officer assigned and clarification on the hours they patrol.
Mayor Martinez opened the item to public comment and Greg Rothnem spoke. Mayor Martinez closed the item to public comment.
Assistant City Manager Clem Brown provided information about where the public can find e-bike safety resources on the City’s website.
Council discussion focused on whether speed humps could be placed in bike lanes to discourage e-bikes from speeding; whether any other North Coastal Cities are considering changing or tightening regulations related to e-bikes; and expressed appreciation to Captain Watts for his presentation.
ITEM 2: CLEAN ENERGY ALLIANCE (CEA) PRESENTATION (CLERK’S FILE NO. 1001-5) A presentation was provided by Clean Energy Alliance (CEA) Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Greg Wade.
City Council questions focused on the energy market overview; outreach for payment assistance and relief programs; the CEA’s goals for future renewable energy expansion and compliance; and net energy metering customers within Del Mar and ways to incentivize participation.
There were no public speakers for this item.
Council discussion focused on appreciation to CEA CEO Greg Wade for his presentation.
ITEM 3: NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT (NCTD) PRESENTATION ON AGENCY PERFORMANCE (CLERK’S FILE NO. 1506-20)
A presentation was provided by NCTD Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Shawn M. Donaghy. NCTD Chief of Staff Mary Dover was available to answer questions.
Council questions focused on the number of individuals riding an NCTD modes of transit; clarification on the boardings by year; whether the Pronto card enables counting people; whether NCTD pays taxes and fees on fuel; zero emission mandate; and how NCTD recruits, trains, and retains bus drivers.
There were no public speakers for this item.
Council discussion focused the NCTD operations cost, benefits of providing transportation to the public, potential train relocation, and expressed appreciation to CEO Donaghy for his presentation.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Administrative Services Manager/City Clerk Sarah Krietor read the titles of the items included on the Consent Calendar. There were no public speakers for the consent calendar items.
IT WAS MOVED BY COUNCILMEMBER GAASTERLAND, SECONDED BY DEPUTY MAYOR SPELICH TO APPROVE THE CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS 4 THROUGH 12. (VOTE 4-0) Ayes: Mayor Martinez; Deputy Mayor Spelich; Councilmembers Gaasterland and Quirk; Noes: 0; Recuse: 0; Absent: 0; Abstain: 0.
2 June 16, 2026 Item 3
City Council Regular Minutes
June 2, 2026
ITEM 4: APPROVAL OF MINUTES: MAY 19, 2026 REGULAR AND SPECIAL MEETING (CLERK’S MINUTES BOOK)
Council approved the minutes, on consent.
ITEM 5: RATIFICATION OF LIST OF DEMANDS, DATED JUNE 2, 2026 (CLERK’S FILE NO. 201-3)
Council approved the list of demands, on consent.
ITEM 6: WAIVER OF READING OF ORDINANCES ON AGENDA (CLERK’S FILE NO. 401-4) Council waived the reading of ordinances, on consent.
ITEM 7: AGREEMENT FOR WATER QUALITY TESTING SERVICES (CLERK’S FILE NO. 406- 1)
Council approved an Agreement with Babcock Laboratories, Inc. for water quality testing services; and authorized the City Manager to execute the agreement and any subsequent term extension amendments provided for under the Agreement, contingent upon satisfactory performance by the vendor, on consent.
ITEM 8: RESOLUTIONS AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF LIABILITY INSURANCE
PROGRAMS MEMORANDA OF UNDERSTANDING AND AMENDING THE CLAIMS SETTLEMENT AUTHORITY (CLERK’S FILE NO. 403-2, 404-9)
Council adopted Resolution 2026-36 “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF DEL MAR, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE
THE PUBLIC RISK INNOVATION, SOLUTIONS, AND MANAGEMENT (PRISM)
MEMORANDA OF UNDERSTANDING FOR THE OPTIONAL EXCESS LIABILITY,
MASTER CRIME, CYBER LIABILITY, AND POLLUTION LIABILITY INSURANCE PROGRAMS;” and Resolution 2026-37 “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DEL MAR, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE CITY MANAGER’S CLAIMS SETTLEMENT AUTHORITY,” on consent.
ITEM 9: FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT WITH CLAIMS MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR GENERAL LIABILITY CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES (CLERK’S FILE NO. 406-1)
Council approved the First Amendment to the agreement with Claims Management Associates, Inc. for general liability claims management services, extending the term for an additional two-year period ending June 30, 2028; and authorized the City Manager to execute the Amendment, on consent.
ITEM 10: TWELVE-MONTH EXTENSION OF DEL MAR FIRE STATION (CLERK’S FILE NO. 103- 2,1101-8)
Council question focused on whether the Fairgrounds considers the benefits of having the Fire Station adjacent to the Fairground when negotiating the City’s lease and whether the 22nd Agricultural District needs to have a fire station or other form of fire suppression services on site based on the activities that occur there. 3 June 16, 2026 Item 3
City Council Regular Minutes
June 2, 2026
Council approved a 12-month extension of the City’s lease with the California Department of General Services and 22nd District Agricultural Association for the Del Mar Fire Station through June 30, 2027; and authorized the City Manager to execute the lease extension, on consent.
PUBLIC HEARING
ITEM 11: RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE DATE BY WHICH PROPERTIES MUST BE
READY TO RECEIVE UNDERGROUND SERVICE IN THE UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT X1A (CREST CANYON) – WORK ZONES 1 AND 2 (CLERK’S FILE NO. 1001-2)
Mayor Martinez opened the public hearing. There were no speakers for this item.
Council questions focused on the date by which properties must be ready to receive underground service.
Council approved Resolution 2026-38, “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
DEL MAR, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE DATE BY WHICH PROPERTIES MUST BE READY TO RECEIVE UNDERGROUND SERVICE IN THE UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT X1A (CREST CANYON) – WORK ZONES 1 AND 2,” on consent.
ITEM 12: DE NOVO HEARING OF AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION’S DECISION TO DENY VARIANCE (V25-002), A REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE FROM: DEL MAR MUNICIPAL CODE (DMMC) SECTION 30.86.090(A)(1) TO ALLOW THE RETENTION
OF FENCING AND GATES THAT EXCEED THE ALLOWED HEIGHT IN WITHIN THE LOT’S REQUIRED FRONT AND STREET-SIDE YARDS (SETBACKS) AND FROM DMMC SECTION 30.86.090(A)(4) TO ALLOW THE RETENTION OF AN ENTRYWAY (ARBOR) STRUCTURE IN EXCESS OF THE OUTER DIMENSIONS AND OPENNESS ALLOWED IN THE FRONT YARD SETBACK.
APPLICANT: VOIGTLANDER, PROPERTY: 355 13TH STREET (APN: 300-020-18-00) (CLERK’S FILE NO. 301-3)
Council continued the de novo hearing to August 25, 2026, on consent.
COUNCIL MEETING RECESS
The City Council took a meeting recess from approximately 7:06 p.m. to 7:13 p.m.
ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION
The Mayor adjourned the meeting into Closed Session from 7:15 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. At the conclusion of Closed Session, the Mayor resumed the Open Session meeting and City Attorney Cameron announced there were no reportable actions.
CITY COUNCIL OTHER BUSINESS
ITEM 13: REVIEW FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 THIRD QUARTER AND PROPOSED 2026-27 OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET UPDATE (CLERK’S FILE NO. 202-1, 202-3) A presentation was provided by Finance Manager Marco Camacho. Finance Officer Monica Molina was available to answer questions.
4 June 16, 2026 Item 3
City Council Regular Minutes
June 2, 2026
Council questions and discussion focused on the fire department budget; future plans to issue a Request for Qualifications related to long-term fire service delivery options; desire to receive an informational presentation from the Fire Chief regarding fire department operations and standards; funding scenarios for paving; and potential funding gap for the Camino del Mar Bridge Replacement and Riverpath Phase 3 projects. Council consensus was to leave the paving budget at $3 million and include an alternate bid for an additional $1 million in paving, with the final paving project budget and award depending on the bids results.
There were no public speakers for this item.
IT WAS MOVED BY COUNCILMEMBER GAASTERLAND AND SECONDED BY DEPUTY MAYOR SPELICH TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 2026-39, “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DEL MAR, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026 OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET,” APPROVE PROPOSED REVISIONS TO THE PENSION RESERVE POLICY,
APPROVE PROPOSED REVISIONS TO THE INVESTMENT POLICY, AND ADOPT RESOLUTION 2026-40, “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DEL MAR, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026-2027, AND DELEGATING THE AUTHORITY TO INVEST CITY FUNDS TO THE TREASURER.” (VOTE 3-1) Ayes: Mayor Martinez; Deputy Mayor Spelich; Councilmember Gaasterland; Noes: Councilmember Quirk; Recuse: 0; Absent: 0; Abstain: 0.
REGIONAL ORGANIZATION AND COUNCIL COMMITTEES/SUBCOMMITTEES/COMMUNITY
ORGANIZATION REPORTS
None.
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Martinez adjourned the meeting at 8:40 p.m.
Sarah Krietor, Administrative Services Manager/
City Clerk
5 June 16, 2026 Item 3
DEL MAR CITY COUNCIL
SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES
CLOSED SESSION
JUNE 2, 2026
City of Del Mar Town Hall
1050 Camino del Mar, Del Mar, California 92014
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Tracy Martinez called the meeting to order at 7:15 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Present: Mayor Tracy Martinez; Deputy Mayor John Spelich; Councilmembers Terry Gaasterland and Dan Quirk
CLOSED SESSION
A) Conference with Legal Counsel – Existing Litigation
Pond v. Del Mar
San Diego Superior Court Case No. 37-2020-343507-CU-PO-CTL Authority Government Code section 54956.9(d)(1)
Reportable Action: None.
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Martinez adjourned the meeting at 7:30 p.m.
_______________________________________
Sarah Krietor, Administrative Services Manager/
City Clerk
6 June 16, 2026 Item 3
Vendor Payment Checks $ 843,655.59
Voids $0.00
Electronic Fund Transfers (EFT) 84,260.51
Electronic Wires -
Total $ 927,916.10
Approved by: Approved by:
Marco Camacho Tracy Martinez
Finance Manager/Treasurer Mayor
Date: Date:
Attachments: Check Registers
LIST OF DEMANDS
CITY OF DEL MAR
for
City Council Meeting
June 16, 2026
6/10/26
1 June 16, 2026 Item 4
06/04/2026
Check List
City of Del Mar
1 1:19:08PM
apChkLst Final Page:
Bank : eusbnk EFT GENERAL ACCOUNT US BANK
Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 7832 6/5/2026 cal81 CALLTOWER INC 203222624 5/25/2026 TELEPHONE JUN 249.32 249.32 Voucher: 7832
7833 6/5/2026 cha71 CHARTER COMM HOLDINGS LLC, CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 189125601 5/14/2026 INTERNET CH MAY 1,394.57 Voucher: 7833 189125701 5/14/2026 CH FIBER TO FIRE MAY 416.48 189125801 5/14/2026 VIDEO TRANSPORT/PEG MAY 338.39
189112801 5/14/2026 VIDEO TRANSPORT/PEG MAY 338.39
189125401 5/14/2026 DMTV INTERNET MAY 119.99
189125501 5/14/2026 PUBLIC WIFI CH MAY 119.99
189125201 5/14/2026 INTERNET TV STUDIO MAY 97.21 2,825.02 7834 6/5/2026 del14 DEL MAR VILLAGE ASSOCIATION 12 6/1/2026 DMVA AGRMNT APR 30,231.02 30,231.02 Voucher: 7834
7835 6/5/2026 dix01 DIXIELINE LUMBER CO 06-0644622 5/29/2026 OPERATING SUPP PW 43.04 43.04 Voucher: 7835
7836 6/5/2026 duk01 DUDEK 202604516 5/13/2026 SD LAGOON ENV SRVCS APR 23,242.50 23,242.50 Voucher: 7836
7837 6/5/2026 fer07 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES LLC, DBA FERGUSON WATERWORKS 0907168 5/28/2026 WATER METER PARTS 2,824.24 2,824.24 Voucher: 7837
7838 6/5/2026 hel04 HELIX ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING 134139 5/29/2026 CREST CNYN UG DISTRICT X1A - MAY 2,281.31 2,281.31 Voucher: 7838
7839 6/5/2026 man12 MANERI TRAFFIC CONTROL INC, DBA MTC 25670 5/27/2026 OPERATING SUPP PW 343.65 343.65 Voucher: 7839
7840 6/5/2026 mik03 MIKHAIL OGAWA ENGINEERING12536 5/4/2026 CLEAN WATER SRVCS APR 19,694.17 Voucher: 7840 12537 5/4/2026 SAN DIEGUITO TMDL APR 2,526.24 22,220.41 Sub total for EFT GENERAL ACCOUNT US BANK: 84,260.51
Page: 1
2 June 16, 2026 Item 4
06/04/2026
Check List
City of Del Mar
2 1:19:08PM
apChkLst Final Page:
Bank : gusbnk GENERAL ACCOUNT US BANK
Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 141243 6/5/2026 acm05 ACME SAFETY & SUPPLY CORP174230-00 5/30/2026 JDB FLAGGERS 1,197.50 1,197.50 Voucher: 141243
141244 6/5/2026 asc03 ASCENT ENVIRONMENTAL INC20250258.01-6 5/18/2026 CONSULTING SRVCS APR/MAY 15,472.58 15,472.58 Voucher: 141244
141245 6/5/2026 sbc03 AT&T 9391031506 5/20/2026 TELEPHONE MAY 63.28 Voucher: 141245 9391065056 5/27/2026 TELEPHONE MAY 30.92 9391065055 5/27/2026 TELEPHONE MAY 30.89 125.09
141246 6/5/2026 bab03 BABCOCK LABORATORIES, INCCE61182-10666 5/21/2026 WATER TESTING 575.00 575.00 Voucher: 141246
141247 6/5/2026 bar29 BARNETT QUALITY CONTROL SRVCS, DBA NOVA SRVCS INC 27111 5/9/2026 JDB BLUFF PROJECT MAY 1,316.53 1,316.53 Voucher: 141247
141248 6/5/2026 bri14 BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES 9769841 5/1/2026 LANDSCAPE SRVCS MAY 16,912.37 16,912.37 Voucher: 141248
141249 6/5/2026 cal91 CALIFORNIA BANK & TRUST 05272026 5/27/2026 TC CONST RETENTION #7 36,127.32 36,127.32 Voucher: 141249
141250 6/5/2026 cal32 CALIFORNIA STATE LANDS COMB50706 3/18/2026 CDM SRVCS FEB 762.15 762.15 Voucher: 141250
141251 6/5/2026 chi03 CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY 73726004252-1 6/3/2026 TITLE REPORT 750.00 750.00 Voucher: 141251
141252 6/5/2026 cin02 CINTAS 5338558015 5/28/2026 FIRST AID KIT SUPP PW 170.90 170.90 Voucher: 141252
141253 6/5/2026 cit07 CITY OF SAN DIEGO 1000451415 5/28/2026 WATER TREATMENT APR 25,535.74 25,535.74 Voucher: 141253
141254 6/5/2026 day03 DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS INV922145 5/29/2026 RADIO EQUIP CS 11,353.71 11,353.71 Voucher: 141254
141255 6/5/2026 del06 DEL MAR AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE 52615 6/1/2026 VEH MAINT PW #75 PW 323.54 323.54 Voucher: 141255
141256 6/5/2026 bee04 DENNIS L JOBE, DBA BEE CHASER 187034 5/23/2026 BEE REMOVAL 200.00 200.00 Voucher: 141256
141257 6/5/2026 got03 GOTSAFETY, LLC 181999 5/1/2026 OSHA SRVCS 600.00 600.00 Voucher: 141257
141258 6/5/2026 haa01 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO INV36794 5/11/2026 EQUIP REPAIR PW 2,796.88 2,796.88 Voucher: 141258
141259 6/5/2026 dar05 JEFFREY SCOTT ARVESON, DBA DAR SERVICES 05012026 5/1/2026 DEAD ANIMAL RMVL APR 450.00 450.00 Voucher: 141259
Page: 2
3 June 16, 2026 Item 4
06/04/2026
Check List
City of Del Mar
3 1:19:08PM
apChkLst Final Page:
Bank : gusbnk GENERAL ACCOUNT US BANK (Continued)
Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 141260 6/5/2026 lal01 JOHN B LALLEY JR, DBA LALLEY CONSTRUCTION S 256 3/22/2026 ELECTRICAL SRVCS PW 1,360.00 Voucher: 141260 257 4/30/2026 ELECTRICAL SRVCS PW 880.00 255 4/30/2026 ELECTRICAL SRVCS PW 405.00 2,645.00
141261 6/5/2026 mis14 MISHEK PROPERTY SERVICES1305 5/26/2026 RESERVOIR CLEANUP 3,000.00 3,000.00 Voucher: 141261
141262 6/5/2026 nap01 NAPA AUTO PARTS 757938 5/4/2026 VEH MAINT SUPP PW 118.78 118.78 Voucher: 141262
141263 6/5/2026 san140 SANDVIG, NICK 06042026 6/4/2026 B2026-0114 REFUND 397.46 397.46 Voucher: 141263
141264 6/5/2026 sou17 SOUTHLAND PAVING INC 05082026 5/8/2026 CLA-VAL RPLCMNT 20,936.88 20,936.88 Voucher: 141264
141265 6/5/2026 tcc01 TC CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC 05272026 5/27/2026 UUD-X1A CREST CNYN #7 686,419.16 686,419.16 Voucher: 141265
141266 6/5/2026 ter11 TERMINIX COMMERCIAL 471567777 5/1/2026 PEST CONTROL PW - MAY 138.00 138.00 Voucher: 141266
141267 6/5/2026 t-mo01 T-MOBILE USA INC 05212026 5/21/2026 TELEPHONE MAY 12.60 12.60 Voucher: 141267
141268 6/5/2026 und01 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT, OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 520260245 6/1/2026 CONT SRVCS JUN 216.40 Voucher: 141268 25-263922 6/1/2026 CA STATE FEES 67.58 283.98 141269 6/5/2026 ver12 VERIZON 73699483 5/20/2026 TELEPHONE APR 128.54 128.54 Voucher: 141269
141270 6/5/2026 ver03 VERIZON WIRELESS 570653198-00008 5/18/2026 TELEPHONE MAY 353.87 Voucher: 141270 6143944423 5/18/2026 TELEPHONE MAY 230.25 872374736-00004 5/18/2026 TELEPHONE MAY 226.05
570653198-00006 5/18/2026 TELEPHONE MAY 186.16
6144082877 5/20/2026 TELEPHONE MAY 168.64
570653198-00009 5/18/2026 TELEPHONE MAY 60.64
570653198-00007 5/18/2026 TELEPHONE MAY 38.01 1,263.62
141271 6/5/2026 wax02 WAXIE'S ENTERPRISES, LLC. DBA, WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 83923075 5/11/2026 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 836.30 Voucher: 141271 83950082 5/28/2026 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 95.96 932.26 141272 6/5/2026 wes29 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC244245 5/15/2026 TREE MAINT SRVCS 5/1-5/15/26 12,710.00 12,710.00 Voucher: 141272
Sub total for GENERAL ACCOUNT US BANK: 843,655.59
Page: 3
4 June 16, 2026 Item 4
06/04/2026
Check List
City of Del Mar
4 1:19:08PM
apChkLst Final Page:
39 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 927,916.10 Page: 4
5 June 16, 2026 Item 4
City of Del Mar
Agenda Report
________________________________________________________________________________________________________ City Council Action:
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Karen Falk, Principal Engineer
Joe Bride, Public Works Director
Via Ashley Jones, City Manager
DATE: June 16, 2026
SUBJECT: Ninth Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with Kleinfelder, Inc. for the Camino Del Mar Bridge Replacement Project
REQUESTED ACTION/RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council: 1) Approve the Ninth Amendment (Attachment A) to the Professional Services Agreement with Kleinfelder, Inc. for engineering design services for the Camino Del Mar Bridge Replacement Project; and 2) Authorize the City Manager to execute the Ninth Amendment.
BACKGROUND:
The Camino Del Mar Bridge Replacement (Project) is one of the City’s current Capital Improvement Program critical infrastructure projects and will replace the roadway bridge over the San Dieguito River adjacent to North Beach. The existing bridge was constructed in 1932 and is beyond its useful life. The bridge was determined to be structurally deficient as part of the 2012 Final Rehabilitation Strategy Report completed by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). The report concluded that replacement is the most cost-effective solution. Caltrans’ concurrence allows the replacement bridge to receive significant Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) financing for the Project.
In 2017, the City executed a Professional Services Agreement (Agreement) with Kleinfelder, Inc. (Kleinfelder) to complete the preliminary design, reviews required for the Project’s federal funding, and the state and federal environmental certifications under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). This phase included field investigations, geotechnical studies, bridge type selection, preliminary drainage studies, traffic and parking impact assessments, hydraulic studies, establishing design criteria, and environmental analysis. As additional Project requirements were identified, the Agreement was amended five times to add scope and fee and to extend the term of the Agreement. The pre-design phase of work was completed in May 2024.
In April 2023, the City executed the Sixth Amendment with Kleinfelder to complete the final design and environmental permitting. This phase of work included the anticipated activities to prepare the Project for construction. Tasks included all of the design calculations, preparation of drawings and technical specifications, acquiring the necessary resource agency permits, 1 June 16, 2026 Item 6
City Council Agenda Report
Ninth Amendment to Kleinfelder Agreement – CDM Bridge Replacement Project June 16, 2026
design of temporary and permanent utilities in the new bridge, completing an independent constructability review, and processing Caltrans approvals to ensure federal funding requirements are met. As additional Project requirements were identified, the Agreement was amended to add scope and fee in November 2024 and November 2025. The original contract and all amendments are attached for reference (Attachment B).
DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS:
The existing contract is due to expire on June 30, 2026. The Ninth Amendment will extend the existing contract through the end of Fiscal Year 2026-2027 and add scope and fee for unanticipated or expanded work identified during the final design and environmental permitting phase of the Project.
The design team has facilitated a series of project meetings in recent months with the franchise utility companies. These coordination meetings have successfully reduced significant utility-related construction scope, with both gas companies eliminating the need for temporary facilities duration of construction. This revised utility construction scope reduces construction time and significant risk for this critical infrastructure project. Although this is beneficial for the overall project delivery, Kleinfelder’s scope and fee must be amended to revise the design drawings and specifications to incorporate these late changes. Table 1 summarizes the additional scope of work and related fees.
Table 1: Amendment 9 Scope of Work and Fee
Task Description Fee
Task 1 – Project
Administration
Expanded Scope: Additional project management
required for the extended project duration,
preparation of forms and documents required for
Caltrans/FHWA review, and coordination meetings
with utilities and key stakeholders.
$25,000
Task 10 – Roadway
Design
Expanded Scope: Revise existing plan sheets
based on revised gas company plans.
$10,000
TOTAL $35,000
The Ninth Amendment will increase the Agreement amount by $35,000, for a total contract amount of $5,377,481, in addition to extending the duration of the contract through June 30, 2027. This amendment provides the engineering services anticipated to complete the design phase, obtain resource agency permits, and finalize the Project for public bidding.
Staff continues to move the project through the required federal reviews, including the preparation of forms and documents required for federal funding approvals. A more comprehensive Project update will be provided on July 7, 2026.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal action to be taken by the City Council related to this agenda item. Funding for the Ninth Amendment totaling $35,000 is included in the adopted Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Operating and Capital Budget.
2 June 16, 2026 Item 6
City Council Agenda Report
Ninth Amendment to Kleinfelder Agreement – CDM Bridge Replacement Project June 16, 2026
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:
This proposed Amendment to the Agreement for engineering services is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because it is not a “project” per Section 15378(b)(5) of CEQA Guidelines. The action involves an organizational or administrative activity of government that will not result in direct or indirect physical change in the environment. A comprehensive environmental analysis has been prepared for the bridge replacement construction pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).
NEXUS TO CITY COUNCIL GOALS AND PRIORITIES:
The Camino Del Mar Bridge Replacement Project is a City Council Tier 1 Priority Project.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment A – Proposed Ninth Amendment to Agreement with Kleinfelder Exhibit A to Attachment A – Scope of Work & Fee
Attachment B – Kleinfelder Professional Services Agreement and First through Eighth Amendments
3 June 16, 2026 Item 6
NINTH AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
THE CITY OF DEL MAR AND KLEINFELDER, INC.
THIS NINTH AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT (“Ninth Amendment”) is made and entered into effective this 16th day of June 2026, by and between the CITY OF DEL MAR, a California municipal corporation and Charter City (“CITY”) and KLEINFELDER, INC., a California Corporation (“CONSULTANT”) (collectively “Parties”).
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the Camino Del Mar Bridge over the San Dieguito River is structurally deficient and seismically and flood vulnerable. Replacement of the Camino Del Mar Bridge (Project) qualified for the Caltrans Eligible Bridge List in 2012, and is therefore eligible for 88.53% reimbursement from the Federal Highway Bridge Program with Caltrans oversight/approval; and WHEREAS, on May 23, 2017, the City and Consultant entered into an Agreement for Preliminary Engineering and Environmental Documentation Services for the Project (“Agreement”); and
WHEREAS, on March 5, 2018, the Parties entered into a First Amendment to the Agreement in which the federal fiscal contract provisions were added to the Agreement in order to comply with the Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM); and WHEREAS, on April 1, 2019, the Parties entered into a Second Amendment to the Agreement with Consultant to extend the term of the Agreement and modify the scope of work and the total Agreement amount; and
WHEREAS, on July 12, 2021, the Parties entered into a Third Amendment to the Agreement with Consultant to extend the term of the Agreement for a one-year period through June 30, 2022, and modify the scope of work and the total Agreement amount; and WHEREAS, on July 1, 2022, the Parties entered into a Fourth Amendment to the Agreement with Consultant to extend the term of the Agreement for a one-year period through June 30, 2023; and
WHEREAS, on October 3, 2022, the Parties entered into a Fifth Amendment to the Agreement with Consultant to modify the scope of work; and WHEREAS, on April 3, 2023, the Parties entered into a Sixth Amendment to the Agreement with Consultant to extend the term of the Agreement for an additional three-year period; expand the scope of work to include finalizing the draft Type Selection Report (dTSR), completing final design, and preparing the project for bid; and increase the not-to-exceed amount to cover the additional required scope of work.
WHEREAS, on November 18, 2024, the Parties entered into a Seventh Amendment to expand the scope of work to include additional design and permitting requirements needed to prepare the project for bid; and increase the not-to-exceed amount to cover the additional required scope of work.
WHEREAS, on November 17, 2025, the Parties entered into an Eighth Agreement to expand the scope of work to include additional field surveying and design work required to prepare the project for bid; and increase the not-to-exceed amount to cover the additional required scope of work.
ATTACHMENT A 4 June 16, 2026 Item 6
City of Del Mar
Ninth Amendment to Agreement with Kleinfelder, Inc.
WHEREAS, the Parties would like to amend the Agreement to extend the term of the Agreement for an additional one-year period; expand the scope of work to include final design and permitting work required to prepare the project for bid; and increase the not-to-exceed amount to cover the additional required scope of work.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereby agree as follows:
1. Section 3.1 of the Agreement shall be amended to read as follows:
“The term of this Agreement shall be from a period beginning May 1, 2017, and ending June 30, 2027.”
2. Section 4.1 of the Agreement shall be amended to read as follows:
“Total Amount. The total cost for all work described in the Scope of Services and Fee Schedule (attached as Exhibit “A”) shall not exceed $5,377,481.”
3. Attachment A of the Agreement shall be amended to include the additional Scope of Work attached to this Ninth Amendment as Exhibit “A.”
4. Except as otherwise provided in this Ninth Amendment, the Agreement, First, Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, and Eighth Amendments, and each and every term, condition, attachment and exhibit, shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Ninth Amendment to the Agreement to be executed the day, and year first above written.
CITY OF DEL MAR, KLEINFELDER, INC.,
a municipal corporation a California corporation
BY:__________________________ BY: ____________________________ Ashley Jones, City Manager John Moossazadeh, Senior Vice President
ATTEST:
By: _____________________________
Sarah Krietor, Administrative Services
Manager/City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By: _____________________________
Christina Cameron, City Attorney
ATTACHMENT A 5 June 16, 2026 Item 6
City of Del Mar
Ninth Amendment to Agreement with Kleinfelder, Inc.
EXHIBIT “A”
Amendment 9 – Extend Existing Contract (Stage C Final Design & Permitting) Camino Del Mar Bridge (57C-0209) at San Dieguito River Replacement Project Project Identification Number BRLS 5356(008)
Based on the following conditions, the City has requested an extension of the existing contract:
Current amendment expires on June 30, 2026
Continued discussions with utility companies and Caltrans have required the redesign of portions of the work, requiring the preparation of additional design drawings, forms, and supplemental materials to advance the project to bidding
Following further discussions in recent months, the gas companies (SDG&E and SoCalGas) have elected to change their design and remove the previously confirmed need for temporary gas piping (highline).
The Original Design incorporated a temporary gas piping system (designed by the gas companies) to be mounted onto the temporary construction trestle crossing over the San Dieguito River. The physical work was to be performed by the gas companies’ procured installation contractor. The Original Design included temporary pipe alignments, locations, bearing & distance notes, connection and fitting details, and other plans as a part of the overall bridge replacement design plans and specifications.
The Changed Design omits the need for temporary gas piping system by capping the gas pipes some distance away from the new bridge construction. The Gas Companies have elected to temporarily disconnect the gas piping system as it crosses the San Dieguito River during specific phases of construction.
This requires revisions to the previously completed (100%) plans and specifications. These conditions have also caused the project to extend longer than was anticipated at the time of negotiated Amendments 6, 7, and 8. The City desires to extend engineering, design, and permit services through the end of Fiscal Year 2026-2027 to cover any additional time that could be required to prepare the project for public bidding.
During this extended period, the Consultant will continue to manage the design team, meet with the City, support inquiries and attend meetings to support Federal funding requirements, and provide updates so that the engineering drawings are included within upcoming Issued for Construction (IFC) Final Plans and documents for bidding and construction. The City’s plan to advertise Final IFC documents for contractor bidding is a major milestone for the conclusion of the current contract (Work Stage C Final Design & Permitting).
This amendment request contains the following tasks to be performed in addition to the previously authorized Scope and Fee included in Amendments 6, 7, and 8. The scope of work is further described in detail, below.
Task Number Description Fee
Task 1 – Project
Administration
Additional Project Management, invoicing, and
coordination during the extended contract duration
Additional Support to City through Caltrans and
FHWA review process, including assistance with
forms and supplemental documents; and
Coordination with project stakeholders, including
SDG&E and SoCalGas, to support updates to the
project
$ 25,000
ATTACHMENT A 6 June 16, 2026 Item 6
City of Del Mar
Ninth Amendment to Agreement with Kleinfelder, Inc.
Task 10 – Roadway Design Additional modifications to the project drawings and specifications to accommodate gas company changes $ 10,000 AMENDMENT 9 TOTAL $35,000
Task 1 – Project Administration
Fee: $ 25,000
Expanded Scope of Work for Project Management Coordination (Code 01-0001) Coordinate and manage work product, staff, and subconsultants Conduct team meetings with client and others
Perform QC/ITR Reviews
Perform monthly invoices and progress reports
Perform computer and file maintenance
Scope of Work for Coordinating with Caltrans (Code 01-0007) Perform Local Assistance Documentation Support, including LAPM and LAPG Manual Interpretations
Revise and resubmit Caltrans Utility and Right of Way Certification to include recent design changes
Continue preparing Caltrans Documentation for RFA-CON Continue supporting Caltrans High Cost Agreement Support & Documentation Continue supporting City to obtain and document HOA Permit to Enter (formerly TCE 1) for Caltrans Utility and Right of Way Certification
Continue Perform PS&E Certification for Caltrans Approval Conduct team meetings with client and others, as needed Prepare meeting minutes and action items, as needed
Scope of Work for Coordinating with SDG&E and So.Cal.Gas (Code 01-0011) Attend meetings and facilitate discussions to coordinate removal of previous Temporary Gas Piping Plans within Final Design Plans
Coordinate and incorporate Updated Permanent Gas Piping Plans into Final Design Plans Coordinate with Gas Companies for official signatures on documentation required for Caltrans Utility and Right of Way Certification
Conduct team meetings with client and others, as needed Prepare meeting minutes and action items, as needed
Task 10 – Roadway Design
Expanded Scope of Work for Final IFC Plan Set and Specifications Fee: $ 10,000
Revise the Original Design for temporary gas pipe alignments, locations, bearing & distance notes, details, and other sheet plans as a part of the overall bridge replacement design plans and specifications.
Incorporate the Changed Design which omits the need for temporary gas piping system by capping the gas pipes some distance away from the new bridge construction. Project design to incorporate updated plans by SDG&E and So.Cal.Gas.
Tasks include:
Incorporate new changes into plans including temporary pipe alignments, locations, bearing & distance notes, connection and fitting details, capping location and associated details, and other plans as a part of the overall bridge replacement design plans and specifications.
ATTACHMENT A 7 June 16, 2026 Item 6
City of Del Mar
Ninth Amendment to Agreement with Kleinfelder, Inc.
Incorporate significant changes within specifications largely removing Gas Company standards and references previously intended to instruct contractor for mounting gas utilities to contractor’s temporary construction trestle. These specifications are no longer applicable. Update IFC Plan Set:
o Final Plans
o Final Specifications
o Final Bid Documents
Include resulting CAD Updates, sheet index, sheet labels The total additional cost for Amendment 9 is $35,000. This brings the total contract value to $5,377,481 as summarized in the table below.
Phase Contract Cost
Project Approval/Environmental Document
Phase (Work Stage B)
Professional Services Agreement and
Amendments 1 through 5 $1,910,966
Final Design and Permitting (Work Stage C)
Amendment 6
Amendment 7
$2,912,033
$ 469,641
Amendment 8 $ 49,841
Amendment 9 $ 35,000
TOTAL $5,377,481
Should you have any technical questions, please feel free to contact:
Don Bloodworth from Kleinfelder at (619) 861.0337 or email [email protected]. Jim Frost from Kleinfelder at (619) 302.9275 or email [email protected].
ATTACHMENT A 8 June 16, 2026 Item 6
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DEL MAR
AND
KLEINFELDER, INC.
This Agreement ("Agreement"), made tnisÆf,aVof May, 2017,by and between the CITY OF DEL MAR, a Charter City and a Municipal Corporation, duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of California ("C|TY"), and Kleinfelder, lnc., a California Corporation ("CONSULTANT") with reference to the following facts which are acknowledged by each party as true and correct:
RECITALS
A. CITY is a general law city, formed and existing pursuant to the provisions of the California Government Code.
B. CITY is authorized to enter into consultant agreements under the provisions of California Government Code section 53060.
C. CITY desires or is in need of Preliminary Engineering and Environmental Documentation services.
D. CONSULTANT has special knowledge, experience and facilities for accomplishing the above services.
E. CITY now desires to retain CONSULTANT to accomplish the above services, and CONSULTANT is willing to be so retained pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the parties as follows:
OPERATIVE PROVISIONS
1. RESPONSIBILITIES OF CONSULTANT
1.1 CONSULTANT shall undertake to carry on the scope of services as listed in the attached Scope of Services (refer to Exhibit "4"), which is attached to and made a pad of this Agreement. To the extent the provisions of Exhibit "A" are ambiguous in relation to the provisions of this Agreement, inconsistent with the provisions of this Agreement, or expand upon the provisions of this Agreement, the provisions of this Agreement shall take precedence and the provisions of Exhibit "A" shall not apply. These duties may be adjusted from time to time as agreed upon in writing by CONSULTANT and CITY. Any additional services authorized by CITY shall be subject to all terms and conditions of this Agreement, except as modified in writing in accordance with Section 24.
1.2 Representations. CONSULTANT will perform the services set out in this Agreement, as contemplated herein, in an efficient, timely, and professional manner, and in accordance with generally accepted standards for performing similar services. lt is understood that CITY, in entering into this Agreement, is relying on CONSULTANT's representations for l{einfelder, lnc Consultant Agreement
ATTACHMENT B 9 June 16, 2026 Item 6
quality and professionalwork performed in a timely manner, and CONSULTANT shall perform in accordance with those representations and standards.
1.3 Monthlv n Reoorts. The Project Manager of CONSULTANT shall prepare and submit to the designated CITY representative a monthly written repod specifying the activities of CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement. CONSULTANT shall prepare the monthly written repod in a format acceptable to the CITY. CONSULTANT shall submit the monthly written report to the CITY by the second Friday of each month.
2. ADMINISTRATION OF AGREEMENT
2.1 CITY appoints its City Manager, or his designee, to administer CITY's rights underthis Agreement, and to review the work performed by CONSULTANT pursuant to the scope of services.
2.2 CONSULTANT shall keep the City Manager, CITY's representative, or his designee or designees, fully informed as to the progress of the work and shall submit to CITY such oral and written reports as CITY may specify.
2.3 This Agreement shall be administered on behalf of the parties hereto, and any notice desired or required to be sent to a party hereunder shall be addressed, as follows:
For CITY
Address
Phone
For CONSULTANT
CONSULTANT
Address:
Phone
Tim Thiele, PE
City Engineer
City of Del Mar
1050 Camino Del Mar
Del Mar, CP.92014
(858) 755-9313
Nathan Johnson, PhD, PE
Vice President, Segment Manager
Kleinfelder, lnc.
550 West C Street
San Diego, CA.92101
(619) 831-4600
3. TERM
3.1 The term of this Agreement shall be from May 1 , 2017 until April 21, 2020.
3.2 Time is of the essence for this Agreement and each provision of this Agreement, unless othen¡uise specified in this Agreement.
4. PAYMENT TO CONSULTANT
4.1 Consideration. ln consideration of the services to be performed by CONSULTANT for the CITY as set forth in Section 1, the CITY agrees to pay CONSULTANT 2 ATTACHMENT B 10 June 16, 2026 Item 6
the not-to-exceed amount of One million two hundred sixteen thousand three hundred and thirtyfour Dollars ($1,216,334), refer to Exhibit "8".
4.2 Additional Services. lf CITY desires any additional services ("Additional Services"), CONSULTANT may, upon written request by the CITY, furnish a proposal including an itemized statement of the estimated cost of the Additional Services thereof, and the CITY may modify or alter the proposal, or may reject the proposal in its entirety, at its sole discretion, or may direct the submission of a new proposal which may be accepted, altered or rejected. Upon the written approval of any Additional Services including costs by CONSULTANT and CITY, CONSULTANT shall perform the Additional Services and CITY will pay to CONSULTANT the cost of the Additional Services as agreed in writing. All money due for Additional Services shall be supported by a detailed statement of CONSULTANT showing the basis of said claims, and certified by proper officers of CONSULTANT.
4.3 Pavments. Payment of CONSULTANT's fee shall be made in accordance with CITY's normal schedule for issuance of checks. CONSULTANT agrees and acknowledges that it is CONSULTANT's sole responsibility to report as income all compensation received from ClÏY, and to make the requisite tax filings and payments to the appropriate federal, state and local tax authorities.
5. STATUS OF CONSULTANT
5.'1 Indepe Contractor. lt is understood and agreed that CITY is interested only in the results obtained from service hereunder and that CONSULTANT shall perform as an independent contractor with sole control of the manner and means of performing the services required under this Agreement. CONSULTANT shall complete this Agreement according to its own methods of work which shall be in the exclusive charge and control of CONSULTANT and which shall not be subject to control or supervision by the CITY, except as to the results of the work. CONSULTANT is, for all purposes arising out of this Agreement, an independent contractor, and neither CONSULTANT, nor its employees, agents and representatives shall be deemed an employee of the CITY for any purpose.
5.2 Emplovee Benefits. CONSULTANT shall be responsible for all salaries, payments, insurance and benefits for all of its officers, agents, representatives and employees in performing services pursuant to this Agreement. lt is expressly understood and agreed that CONSULTANT and its employees, agents, and representatives shall in no event be entitled to any CITY benefits to which CITY employees are entitled, including, but not limited to, overtime, retirement benefits, insurance, vacation, worker's compensation, sick or injury leave or other benefits.
5.3 Workers' Compensation lnsurance. CONSULTANT agrees to procure and maintain in full force and effect Workers' Compensation lnsurance covering its employees and agents while these persons are participating in the activities hereunder, as provided in Section
6.1.2 of this Agreement.
5.4 Prevailing Wages. Pursuant to the provisions of section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Agreement, from the Director of the Department of lndustrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City Clerk. Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office. CONSULTANT shall post a copy of such rates at their 3 ATTACHMENT B 11 June 16, 2026 Item 6
office and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. lf applicable, CONSULTANT shall comply with the provisions of sections 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777 .6, and 1813 of the Labor Code and any other applicable laws.
Pursuant to the provisions of section 1775 of the Labor Code, CONSULTANT shall forfeit to CITY, as a penalty, the sum of fifty dollars ($50.00) for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this Agreement, by him or by any sub-consultant under him, in violation of the provisions of this Agreement.
6. INSURANCI
CONSULTANT shall not begin the services under this Agreement until it has: (a) obtained, and upon the CITY's request, provided to the CITY, insurance cedificates reflecting evidence of all insurance required in this Section 6; however, CITY reserves the right to request, and CONSULTANT shall submit, copies of any policy upon reasonable request by CITY; (b) obtained CITY approval of each company or companies as required by Section 6; and (c) confirmed that all policies contain the specific provisions required in Section 6.
6.1 Tvpes of lnsurance. At all times during the term of this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall maintain insurance coverage as follows:
6.1.1 Commercial General Liability. Commercial General Liability (CGL) lnsurance written on an occurrence basis to protect CONSULTANT and CITY against liability or claims of liability which may arise out of this Agreement in the amount of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence and subject to an annual aggregate of Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000). There shall be no endorsement or modification of the CGL limiting the scope of coverage for either insured vs. insured claims or contractual liability.
6.1.2 Workers' Compensation. For all of CONSULTANT's employees who are subject to this Agreement and to the extent required by applicable state or federal law, CONSULTANT shall keep in full force and effect a Workers' Compensation policy. That policy shall provide employers' liability coverage as required by applicable state and/or federal Workers' Compensation laws, and CONSULTANT shall provide an endorsement that the insurer waives the right of subrogation against the CITY and its respective elected officials, officers, employees, agents and representatives. ln the event a claim under the provisions of the California Workers' Compensation Act is filed against CITY by a bona fide employee of CONSULTANT participating under this Agreement, CONSULTANT agrees to defend and indemnify the CITY from such claim.
6.1 .3 Professional Liability. For all of CONSULTANT's employees who are subject to this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall keep in fullforce and effect Professional Liability coverage for professional liability with a limit of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per claim and Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) annual aggregate. CONSULTANT shall ensure both that: (1) the policy retroactive date is on or before the date of commencement of services under this Agreement; and (2) the policy will be maintained in force for a period of four years after termination of this Agreement or substantial completion of services under this Agreement, whichever occurs last.
CONSULTANT agrees that for the time period defined above, there will be no changes or endorsements to the policy that increase the CITY's exposure to loss. 4 ATTACHMENT B 12 June 16, 2026 Item 6
6.1.4 CommercialAutom oh e I iabilitv For allof the CONSULTANT's automobiles including owned, hired and non-owned automobiles, automobile insurance written on an ISO form CA O0 01 12 90 or a later version of this form or an equivalent form providing coverage at least as broad for bodily injury and property damage for a combined single limit of $500,000 per occurrence. lnsurance certificate shall reflect coverage for any automobile (any auto).
6.2 lnsurer Requirements. All insurance required by express provision of this Agreement shall be carried only by responsible insurance companies that are no less than "4" and "Vll" or better by the A.M. Best Key Rating Guide, and are licensed to do business in the State of California. CITY will accept insurance provided by non-admitted "surplus lines" carriers only if the carrier is authorized to do business in the State of California.
6.3 Deductibles. All deductibles on any policy shall be the responsibility of CONSULTANT and shall be disclosed to CITY at the time the evidence of insurance is provided.
6.4 Specific Provisions Required. Each policy required under this Section 6 shall expressly provide, and an endorsement shall be submitted to CITY, that: (a) the policies are primary and non-contributory to any insurance that may be carried by CITY; with the exception of Workers'Compensation and Professional Liability; and (b) CITY is entitled to thitty (30) days' prior written notice (10 days for cancellation due to non-payment of premium) of cancellation, material reduction, or non-renewal of the policy or policies. Additionally, the CGL policy shall expressly provide, and an endorsement shall be submitted to CITY, that the City of Del Mar and its respective officers and employees are additional insured under the policy.
6.5 lndemnitv Not Limited bv lnsurance. CONSULTANT's liabilities, including, but not limited to, CONSULTANT's indemnity and defense obllgations under this Agreement, shall not be deemed limited in any way to the insurance coverage required herein. Maintenance of specified insurance coverage is a material element of this Agreement, and CONSULTANT's failure to maintain or renew coverage or to provide evidence of renewal during the term of this Agreement may be treated as a material breach of contract by CITY.
7. AUDIT AND INSPECTION OF RECORDS
At any time during CONSULTANT's normal business hours and as often as CITY may deem necessary, and upon reasonable notice, CONSULTANT shall make available to CITY, or any of its duly authorized representatives, for examination, audit, excerpt, copying or transcribing, all data, records, investigation reports and all other materials respecting matters covered by this Agreement. CONSULTANT will permit CITY to audit and to make audits of all invoices, materials, payrolls, records of personnel and other data related to all matters covered by this Agreement. All material referenced in this Section, including all pertinent cost accounting, financial records, and proprietary data, must be kept and maintained by CONSULTANT for a period of at least four (4) years, or for the period required by law, whichever is greater, after completion of CONSULTANT's pedormance hereunder, unless CITY's written permission is given to dispose of same prior to that time.
8. CONFIDENTIALITY AND IJSF OF INFORMATION
8,1 Except as otherwise provided by law, all reports, communications, documents and information obtained or prepared by CONSULTANT respecting matters covered by this J
ATTACHMENT B 13 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Agreement shall not be published without prior written consent of City Manager or his designees, nor shall CONSULTANT issue any news releases or publish information relating to its services hereunder without the prior written consent of the City Manager. CONSULTANT shall hold in trust for the CITY, and shall not disclose to any person, any confidential information. Confidential information is information which is related to the CITY's research, development, trade secrets and business affairs, but does not include information which is generally known or easily ascerlainable by nonparties through available public documentation.
8.2 CONSULTANT shall advise CITY of any and all materials used, or recommended for use, by CONSULTANT to achieve the project goals that are subject to any copyright restrictions or requirements. ln the event CONSULTANT shall fail to so advise CITY and, as a result of the use of any programs or materials developed by CONSULTANT under this Agreement, CITY should be found in violation of any copyright restrictions or requirements, CONSULTANT agrees to indemnify and hold harmless CITY against any action or claim brought by the copyright holder.
8.3 Ownership of Records. All records created by the CONSULTANT shall become the property of the CITY and shall be subject to state law and CITY policies governing privacy and access to files. The CITY shall have access to and the right to examine all books, documents, papers and records of the CONSULTANT involving transactions and work related to this Agreement. The CONSULTANT shall retain all copies of records for a period of five (5) years from the date of final payment.
9. NOTICE
All notices or demands to be given under this Agreement by either pady to the other shall be in writing and given either by: (a) personal service, (b) by U.S. Mail, mailed either by certified mail, return receipt requested, with postage prepaid and addressed to the party to whom the notice is directed, or (c) via facsimile transmission (with proof of confirmation by sender). Service shall be considered given when received if personally served or, if mailed, two days after deposit in the United States Mail by certified mail, return receipt requested. The address to which notices or demands may be given by either party may be changed by written notice given in accordance with the notice provisions of this section. At the date of this Agreement, the addresses of the parties are as set fotlh in Section 2 above.
10. TERMINATION FOR CAUSE
10.1 CITY may terminate this Agreement upon giving of written notice of intention to terminate for cause. Cause shall include: (a) a material violation of any of the covenants, agreements, or stipulations of this Agreement by CONSULTANT, (b) CONSULTANT, through any cause, failing to fulfill in a timely and proper manner its obligations under this Agreement, (c) any act by CONSULTANT exposing CITY to liability to others for personal injury or property damage, or (d) if CONSULTANT is adjudged bankrupt, CONSULTANT makes a general assignment for the benefit of creditors, or a receiver is appointed on account of CONSULTANT's insolvency.
Written notice by CITY of termination for cause shall contain the rçasons for such intention to terminate and shall specify the effective date thereof. Unless prior to the effective date of the termination for cause the condition or violation shall cease, or satisfactory arrangements for the correction thereof be made, this Agreement shall cease and terminate on the effective date specified in the written notice by CITY.
6 ATTACHMENT B 14 June 16, 2026 Item 6
10.2\n the event of such termination, CONSULTANT shall be paid the reasonable value of satisfactory services rendered up to the date of receipt of the notice of termination in accordance with this Agreement, less any payments theretofore made, as determined by CITY, not to exceed the amount payable herein, and CONSULTANT expressly waives any and all claims for damages or compensation arising under this Agreement in the event of such termination, except as set fotth herein.
11. TERMINATION FOR IENCE OF CITY
1 1 .1 CITY may terminate this Agreement at any time and for any reason by giving written notice to CONSULTANT of such termination, and specifying the effective date thereof, at least fifteen (15) days prior to the effective date.
11.2|f the Agreement is terminated as provided in this Section, CONSULTANT shall be entitled to receive compensation for any satisfactory work completed up to the receipt by CONSULTANT of notice of termination, less any payments theretofore made and not to exceed the amount payable herein, and for satisfactory work completed between the receipt of notice of termination and the effective date of termination pursuant to a specific request by CITY for the performance of such work.
12. PERFORMANCE AFTER TERMINATION
Upon termination of this Agreement as provided herein, CONSULTANT shall, within such reasonable time period as may be directed by City Manager, complete those items of work which are in various stages of completion and which City Manager determines are necessary to be completed by CONSULTANT to allow the project to be completed in a timely, logical, and orderly manner. Upon termination, allfinished or unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, models, photographs, reports, and other materials prepared by CONSULTANT shall be delivered to the City Manager, upon his request, as property of CITY. Any use of incomplete documents without the specific written authorization from CONSULTANT will be at the CITY's sole risk and without liability or legal exposure to CONSULTANT.
13. DEFENSE AND INDEMNIFICATION
13.1 lndemnitv for Professional Liabilitv. Except for the sole negligence or willful misconduct of CITY, CONSULTANT shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, hold harmless, protect, defend (with attorneys approved by CITY) and indemnify the CITY, its council and each member thereof, its officers, employees, representatives and their successors and assigns from and against all losses, liabilities, claims, suit, damage, expenses, cost, including reasonable attorney's fees and costs, and expert costs and investigation expenses, caused in whole or in part by the negligent, reckless or wrongful acts, errors or omissions of CONSULTANT in the performance of the professional services under this Agreement and those of CONSULTANT's sub-consultants or anyone for whom CONSULTANT is liable regardless of whether or not such claim, loss or liability is caused in part by a party indemnified hereunder.
13.2 lndemnitv for Other than Professional Liabilitv. With respect to operations other than the performance of the professional services under this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, hold harmless, protect, defend (with attorneys approved by CITY) and indemnify the CITY, its council, and each member thereof, its officers, agents, employees, representatives, and their successors and assigns, from and against any and all losses, liabilities, claims, suit damage, expenses and costs Including reasonable attorney's fees and costs, and expert costs and investigation expenses ("Claims"), which arise out of or are in any way connected to the performance of CONSULTANT, its officers, employees, representatives, 7 ATTACHMENT B 15 June 16, 2026 Item 6
subcontractors, or agents under this Agreement regardless of whether or not such claim, Ioss or liability is caused, in part by a party indemnified hereunder. CONSULTANÏ shall have no obligation, however, to defend or indemnify CITY if it is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction that such Claim was caused by the sole negligence or willful misconduct of CITY.
13.3 General lndemnitv Provisions. This indemnity is in addition to any other rights or remedies which CITY may have under the law or this Agreement. ln the event of any claim or demand made against any party which is entitled to be indemnified hereunder, CITY may, at its sole discretion, reserve, retain or apply any monies due to CONSULTANT under this Agreement for the purpose of resolving such claims; provided however, that CITY may release such funds if CONSULTANT provides ClTYwith reasonable assurances of protection of the CITY's interest. Ïhe CITY shall, in its sole discretion determine whether such assurances are reasonable.
CONSULTANT agrees that its duty to defend the indemnities arises upon an allegation of liability based upon the performance of services under this Agreement by CONSULTANT, its officers, agents, representatives, employees, sub-consultants, or anyone for whom CONSULTANT is liable and that an adjudication of CONSULTANT's liability is not a condition precedent to CONSULTANT's duty to defend.
14. CONFLICT OF INTFREST
14.1 CONSULTANT shall be bound by the requirements of the FPPC (Fair Political Practice Commission) and state law with regard to disclosure of financial interests and prohibited conflicts of interest.
14.2Prior to execution of this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall disclose in writing to CITY any and all compensation, actual or potential, which CONSULTANT may receive in any form from a party other than CITY as a result of performance of this Agreement by CONSULTANÏ. lf CONSULTANT becomes aware of the potential for such compensation subsequent to the execution of this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall disclose such compensation within three (3) working days of becoming aware of the potential for such compensation.
14.3 Prior to or concurrent with making any recommendation of any products or service for purchase by the CITY, CONSULTANT shall disclose any financial interest that CONSULTANT may have in any manufacturer or provider of the recommended products or services. The term "financial interest" includes, but is not limited to, employment (current or prospective) or ownership interest of any kind and degree.
14.4 CONSULTANT shall not conduct business for third parties which may be in conflict with CONSULTANT's responsibilities under this Agreement. CONSULTANT may not solicit any business during the term of this Agreement which conflicts with its responsibilities under this Agreement. CONSULTANT shall provide no services for any private client within the corporate boundaries or sphere of influence of CITY during the period of this Agreement which may constitute a conflict of interest.
8 ATTACHMENT B 16 June 16, 2026 Item 6
CONSULTANT acknowledges that he/she has read Section 14. Conflict of lnterest, and may have _ or does not have X a potential conflict of interest, and will _ or will not X need to flle a Statement of Economic lnterest Form 700. lf CONSULTANT is required to flle a Statement of Economic lnterest, a Form 700 shall accompany this eçcuted Contract. )79 Consultant'slnitial
15. ASST.NMENT 4 citv of Del Mar lnitial
No portion of this Agreement or any of the work to be performed hereunder may be assigned or delegated (including hiring and retaining use of any other person or entity for any purpose, except for those certain subconsultants specifically included in the attached "Scope of Services") by CONSULTANT without the express written consent of CITY, nor may any interest in this Agreement be transferred (whether by assignment or novation) by CONSULTANT without the express written consent of CITY, and without such consent all services hereunder are to be performed by CONSULTANT, its officers, agents and employees. However, claims for money due or to become due to CONSULTANT from CITY under this Agreement may be assigned to a bank, trust company, or other financial institution without such approval. Notice of such assignment or transfer shall be furnished promptly to CITY. Any assignment requiring approval may not be further assigned without CITY approval.
16, SURVIVAL
CONSULTANT's representations, insurance and indemnity obligations, and performance obligations post-termination shall survive termination of this Agreement.
17. COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAWS
CONSULTANT agrees to comply with all federal, state and local laws, rules, regulations and ordinances that are now or may in the future become applicable to CONSULTANT, CONSULTANT's business, equipment and personnel engaged in activities covered by this Agreement or arising out of the performance of such activities. lf there is any change to the Scope of Work or the Contract price and/or Contract times, Consultant shall first provide City with a written request to revise the Scope of Work and a written request to increase the Contract price and/or Contract times. The City shall then submit the same to the City Council for consideration.
CONSULTANT shall not proceed with any change in the work without prior authorization from City.
18. PERMITS/LICENSES
CONSULTANT and all of CONSULTANT's employees or agents shall secure and maintain in force such permits and licenses as are required by law in connection with the furnishing of services pursuant to this Agreement.
19. NONDISCRIMINATION IN EMPLOYMENT
CONSULTANT agrees that it will not engage in unlawful discrimination in employment and shall comply with all applicable laws and regulations of CITY and/or all other relevant government agencies, including, but not limited to, the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing and the Federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Also, CONSULTANT certifies and agrees that all persons employed by CONSULTANT, its affiliates, subsidiaries and related entities, if any, will be treated equally by CONSULTANT, without unlawful discrimination based upon creed, sex, race, national origin, or any other classification prohibited by state or federal law. lf CITY finds that any of the provisions of this Section have been violated, such 9 ATTACHMENT B 17 June 16, 2026 Item 6
violation shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement, upon which CITY may determine to cancel, terminate, or suspend this Agreement. While CITY reserves the right to determine independently that the anti-discrimination provisions of the Agreement have been violated, in addition, a determination by the California Fair Employment Practices Commission or California Department of Fair Employment and Housing, or successor agency, or the Federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, or successor agency, that CONSULTANT has violated state or federal anti-discrimination laws relative to this Agreement shall constitute a finding by CITY that CONSULTANT has violated the anti-discrimination provisions of this Agreement.
20. NON-WAIVER
The failure of CITY or CONSULTANT to seek redress for violation of, or to insist upon, the strict performance of any term or condition of this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver by that party of such term or condition, or prevent a subsequent similar act from again constituting a violation of such term or condition. Payment to CONSULTANT of compensation under this Agreement shall not be deemed to waive CITY's rights or CONSULTANT's rights contained in this Agreement.
ATTACHMENT B 18 June 16, 2026 Item 6
21. SEVERABILITY
lf any term, condition or provision of this Agreement is held by a coutl of competent jurisdiction to be unenforceable, invalid, or void, the remaining provisions will nevertheless continue in full force and effect and shall not be affected, impaired or invalidated in any way.
22. DISPUTES
ln the event that any action is brought by either pady to construe this Agreement or enforce any of its terms, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its reasonable attorneys'fees and costs incurred, whether or not the matter proceeds to judgment.
23. REMEDIES
The rights and remedies of the CITY provided in this Agreement are not intended to be exclusive, and are in addition to any other rights and remedies permitted by law.
24. ENTIRE AGREEMENT/AM FNDIVIFNT
This Agreement and any exhibits attached hereto constitute the entire agreement between the parties and supersede any prior or contemporaneous understanding or agreement with respect to the services contemplated, and may be amended only by a written amendment executed by both parties to the Agreement.
25. GOVERNING LAWA/ENUE
The terms and conditions of this Agreement shall be goVerned by the laws of the State of California. Any action or proceeding brought by any party against any other party arising out of or related to this Agreement shall be brought exclusively in San Diego County.
26. BINDING AGREEMENT
This Agreement is intended to be binding on the pafties and their respective successors and assigns.
27, NUMBER
The plural shall include the singular, and the singular shall include the plural and neuter wherever the context so indicates or requires,
28. WARRANTY OF AUTHORITY
Each of the parlies signing this Agreement warrants to the other that it has the full authority of the entity on behalf of which its signature is made.
29. COUNTERPARTS
This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, all of which taken together will be considered one original document.
10 ATTACHMENT B 19 June 16, 2026 Item 6
A
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written.
c OF DEL KLEINFELDER, INC
Scott Huth, City Manager Nathan Johnson, PhD, PE
VP, Segment Manager
Signature
Name/title of signatory [if necessary]
Ashley Jones, Services Director
Signature
APPROVED AS ÏO FORM
Leslie , City Attorney
11 ATTACHMENT B 20 June 16, 2026 Item 6
CAMINO DEL MAR BRIDGE
BRIDGE #57C0209
EXHIBIT A-1
SCOPE OF WORK
AMENDMENT I:
PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING &
ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION
SUBMITTED BY:
KLEINFELDER, INC.
(SIMON WONG ENGINEERING)
DATE:
August 12, 2016
ATTACHMENT B 21 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge - Scope of Work
Amendment I: Preliminary Engineering
& Environmental Documentation
August 12, 2016 Page i
EXHIBIT A‐1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. PROJECT LOCATION ................................................................................................... 4 II. PROJECT BACKGROUND............................................................................................ 4 III. PROJECT OBJECTIVE .................................................................................................. 5 IV. CONSULTANT REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................... 5 V. WORK TO BE PERFORMED BY CONSULTANT .................................................... 6 WORK STAGE B – PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT ..... 6 Task 1: PROJECT MANAGEMENT .......................................................................................... 6
1.1 Project Administration .................................................................................................. 6
1.2 Project Controls ............................................................................................................ 6
1.2.1 Schedule and Milestones ........................................................................................ 6
1.2.2 Progress Reports and Invoices .............................................................................. 6
1.2.3 Document Control .................................................................................................. 6
1.3 QC/QC Plan and Program ........................................................................................... 7 Task 2: COORDINATION AND MEETINGS ............................................................................ 7
2.2 Stakeholder Coordination Meetings ............................................................................. 7
2.3 Team Meetings .............................................................................................................. 8 Task 3: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING .................................................................................. 8
3.1 Research and Data Gathering ............................................................................................ 8
3.1.1 Gather Existing Data ............................................................................................. 8
3.1.2 Field Survey and Mapping ..................................................................................... 8
3.1.4 Utility Research and Mapping ............................................................................... 9
3.1.5 Potholing .............................................................................................................. 10
3.1.6 Additional Topographic Survey ........................................................................... 10
3.2 Develop Preliminary Project Alternatives .................................................................. 10
3.2.1 Alternatives Identification .................................................................................... 10
3.2.2 Preliminary Bridge Staging Plans ....................................................................... 11
3.3 Prepare Draft Bridge Hydraulics Report ................................................................... 11
3.3.1 Field Review and Data Gathering ....................................................................... 11
3.3.2 Hydraulic Evaluation ........................................................................................... 11
3.3.3 Sediment Transport Analysis ............................................................................... 12
3.3.4 Prepare Report .................................................................................................... 12
3.4 Preliminary Geotechnical Reports .............................................................................. 12
3.4.1 Preliminary Foundation Report ........................................................................... 12 ATTACHMENT B 22 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge - Scope of Work
Amendment I: Preliminary Engineering
& Environmental Documentation
August 12, 2016 Page 2
EXHIBIT A‐1
3.42 Preliminary Geotechnical Report ......................................................................... 13
3.5 Traffic Study ................................................................................................................ 14
3.5.1 Traffic Data .......................................................................................................... 14
3.5.2 Operational Analysis ........................................................................................... 15
3.5.3 Construction Conditions and Recommendations ................................................. 16
3.5.4 Traffic Report ........................................................................................................ 16
3.6 Utility Conflict Matrix ................................................................................................. 17
3.7 Roadway Concept Layouts .......................................................................................... 17
3.8 Architectural Concept Designs ................................................................................... 17
3.9 Advance Planning Studies ........................................................................................... 18
3.10 Preliminary Drainage Report ..................................................................................... 18
3.11 Water Quality Study .................................................................................................... 18
3.12 Prepare Preliminary Environmental Study (PES) ...................................................... 19
3.13 Field Review Meeting .................................................................................................. 19 Task 4: ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNICAL STUDIES ............................................................. 20
4.1 Technical Studies Management................................................................................... 21
4.2 Project Description ..................................................................................................... 21
4.3 Wetlands Delineation .................................................................................................. 21
4.4 Lagoon Health Assessment ......................................................................................... 22
4.5 Historical Property Survey Report and Archaeological Survey Report ..................... 22
4.6 Environmental Site Assessment ................................................................................... 23
4.7 Species Surveys ........................................................................................................... 23
4.7.1 Sensitive Plants .................................................................................................... 23
4.7.2 Sensitive Animals ................................................................................................. 24
4.8 Biological Assessment ................................................................................................. 24
4.9 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas ................................................................................ 25
4.10 Noise Study .................................................................................................................. 25
4.11 Section 4(f) Evaluation ................................................................................................ 26
4.12 Community Impacts Technical Memorandum ............................................................ 27
4.13 Visual Impact Assessment ........................................................................................... 28
4.14 Conceptual Mitigation Plan ........................................................................................ 28 Task 5: PUBLIC OUTREACH .................................................................................................... 29 ATTACHMENT B 23 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge - Scope of Work
Amendment I: Preliminary Engineering
& Environmental Documentation
August 12, 2016 Page 3
EXHIBIT A‐1
5.1 Public Meetings........................................................................................................... 29
5.2 Information Exchange ................................................................................................. 29 Task 6: ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT.............................................................................. 29
6.1 Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration ................................................... 29
6.2 Public Review .............................................................................................................. 30
6.3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan ................................................................ 30
6.4 Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration ................................................... 30
6.5 NEPA Support ............................................................................................................. 30 Task 7: PROJECT REPORT ................................................................................................... 30
7.2 Final Project Report ................................................................................................... 31 Task 8: 30% DESIGN BASIS ................................................................................................... 31 VI. ADDITIONAL SERVICES............................................................................................ 32 VII. WORK TO BE PERFORMED BY THE CITY............................................................... 32 VIII. DESIGN STANDARDS .................................................................................................. 33 IX. PAYMENT OF FEE FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES ............................................ 33 X. METHOD OF PAYMENT............................................................................................. 34 XI. PROJECT SCHEDULE ................................................................................................. 34 ATTACHMENT B 24 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge - Scope of Work
Amendment I: Preliminary Engineering
& Environmental Documentation
August 12, 2016 Page 4
EXHIBIT A‐1
I. PROJECT LOCATION
The Camino Del Mar Bridge over the San Dieguito River (#57C-0209) is located within the City of Del Mar, west of Interstate 5, south of Via De La Valle and north of 29th Street (Thomas Guide:
1187-F2).
II. PROJECT BACKGROUND
The Camino Del Mar Bridge (#57C-0209) is an 11-span reinforced concrete T-beam structure that was constructed in 1932 and widened in 1952. In 2000, the traffic barriers were upgraded using metal tubular railings, and the metal and timber pedestrian walkway was replaced. It should be noted, at that time the bridge was not considered Structurally Deficient (SD). However, in 2006 the Sufficiency Rating (SR) was listed as 43.2, and in 2010, it was listed as 61.5 and SD, primarily due to poor condition of the superstructure. Therefore, the bridge is currently on the “Eligible Bridge List.”
Significant signs of superstructure deterioration in the form of cracks and spalls have been identified from corrosion of reinforcing steel. These signs have appeared primarily on the underside of exterior girders that are part of the widened structure and on tops of braces that span between beams. As-built plans indicate the bridge piers and abutments are supported on concrete footings with timber piling located approximately 20 feet below the existing ground elevation.
This type of foundation may become unstable during a seismic event if the supporting stratum liquefies. Available subsurface field-test data within the surrounding lagoon suggests high potential for liquefaction and lateral spreading. In addition available scour data for this bridge reveals local scour below the bottom of footing.
Supporting one vehicular lane of traffic and one bicycle lane in each direction and a 7-foot raised median plus a barrier-separated pedestrian walkway, the bridge is generally adequate for functional requirements of the site. Peak traffic demands (20,000 ADT) occur on weekends and during special events at the nearby Del Mar Racetrack. The Camino Del Mar Bridge is located within the recently restored San Dieguito Lagoon and, therefore, any alternatives to upgrade the bridge must consider health of the lagoon and not negatively impact sediment transport or tidal flow.
Work Stage A of this scope of work was to perform preliminary structural assessment of the bridge and determine rehabilitation required to remove the bridge from the “Eligible Bridge List.” The result of Work Stage A was a Rehabilitation Strategy Report that confirmed issues of deterioration due to corrosion, and identified several additional items that require corrective action, including collapse vulnerability during the design seismic event, scour criticality, and a backwater condition during the design flood. It was concluded that replacement is clearly the most cost effective solution to address rehabilitation needs.
In October 2012, Caltrans provided concurrence with the bridge replacement scope as recommended by the Rehabilitation Strategy Report prepared by Simon Wong Engineering (Kleinfelder) on behalf of the City of Del Mar. Caltrans determined that a bridge replacement should be more practical, reasonable, and cost effective than a bridge rehabilitation project.
ATTACHMENT B 25 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge - Scope of Work
Amendment I: Preliminary Engineering
& Environmental Documentation
August 12, 2016 Page 5
EXHIBIT A‐1
III. PROJECT OBJECTIVE
Services performed for this project are anticipated in the following five work stages. Work Stage A is complete. The objective of this scope is Work Stage B.
Work Stage A – Rehabilitation/Retrofit Strategy (past agreement) Work Stage B – Preliminary Engineering & Environmental Documentation (amended agreement) Work Stage C – Regulatory Permitting and Final Design (future amendment) Work Stage D – Construction Bidding and Award Support (future amendment) Work Stage E – Design Support during Construction (future amendment) The main objective of Work Stage B is to prepare the necessary environmental documentation to clear the project and initiate the permit applications for construction of the new bridge. Consultant will prepare technical reports documenting all preliminary engineering work performed in support of the environmental documentation.
The following scope of work has been developed based on the current understanding of the required process; however, it should be noted that additional tasks and schedule adjustments may be required as this phase develops.
IV. CONSULTANT REQUIREMENTS
A. Consultant designates Nathan Johnson, P.E., as its representative and is empowered to manage this project. The City must approve any subsequent changes to the designated engineer.
B. Inquiries from the public, media, and other agencies shall be referred to the City’s designated project manager.
C. Unless otherwise specified under Section VII of this scope, Consultant shall furnish and/or prepare all materials, data, and information needed to conduct studies and perform the tasks and activities outlined in this scope of services.
D. Consultant shall perform all tasks and activities incidental to the required services and preparation of the deliverables under this contract.
E. All reports, technical provisions, engineer’s estimate, and other required documents shall be submitted on CD in Microsoft Word.
F. Consultant shall prepare deliverables and supporting structural and non-structural calculations in accordance with the methods, procedures, and guidelines contained in the references listed under Section VIII “Design Standards” in a manner consistent with a high level of professional skill, care, and accuracy.
G. Most expenditures incurred by the City on this project will be eligible for federal reimbursement. Therefore, the contract documents are subject to review and approval by Caltrans.
H. All deliverables and supporting documentation shall be prepared based on English values using English Units.
ATTACHMENT B 26 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge - Scope of Work
Amendment I: Preliminary Engineering
& Environmental Documentation
August 12, 2016 Page 6
EXHIBIT A‐1
V. WORK TO BE PERFORMED BY CONSULTANT
WORK STAGE B – PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL
DOCUMENT
Work to be performed by Consultant for “Work Stage B” shall consist of the following items:
Task 1: PROJECT MANAGEMENT
This task includes effort associated with Work Stage B for administration, schedules, quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC), document control, and oversight of self-performed and subconsultant work.
1.1 Project Administration
Maintain the project specific management plan and update project-related information including project organization chart, contact information for all members of the team, task tracking, and a deliverables list. Oversee and manage execution of all deliverables for Work Stage B including work planned to be performed by subconsultants.
Supervise, coordinate, and monitor work for conformance with City, County, State, and applicable federal standards and policies.
Prepare, circulate, and file correspondence and memos as appropriate.
1.2 Project Controls
1.2.1 Schedule and Milestones
Consultant will prepare a detailed project schedule which indicated milestones, major activities, and deliverables. The schedule will reflect assumed review times necessary by all stakeholder agencies. Schedule and milestone changes related to Work Stage B efforts will be tracked, and schedule will be updated as necessary.
Schedule updates will be discussed at the monthly PDT meetings.
1.2.2 Progress Reports and Invoices
Consultant will include efforts of Work Stage B within monthly progress reports.
The progress will be provided and discussed at the monthly PDT meeting and will be attached to the invoice for the same period of performance.
1.2.3 Document Control
Consultant will manage paper and electronic files, transmittal forms, submittals, letters, correspondence, and other documents. Consultant will use a program such as SharePoint for managing and storing files, including CAD drawings.
Assumptions
24-month Duration
Deliverables
Project Schedule at Notice-to-Proceed (NTP)
ATTACHMENT B 27 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge - Scope of Work
Amendment I: Preliminary Engineering
& Environmental Documentation
August 12, 2016 Page 7
EXHIBIT A‐1
Monthly Project Schedule Updates
Monthly Progress Reports and Invoices
1.3 QC/QC Plan and Program
A project specific QA/QC plan will be developed that will establish protocols and procedures for team members to follow to ensure current project data and policies are used in project development. The QA/QC plan will remain in force during the performance of the services identified herein. All reports, plans, studies, estimates, and other documents submitted will be complete, accurate, checked, and proofread to meet professional engineering practices and the standard of care in effect at the time of execution of the scope. Each deliverable will identify the person responsible for developing the document and the person responsible for quality control of the document. Consultant will maintain written records of all activities.
Deliverables
QA/QC Plan
QA/QC Documentation for Deliverables
Task 2: COORDINATION AND MEETINGS
2.1 Project Development Team Meetings
A Project Development Team (PDT) including representatives from the City, Caltrans, and other relevant agencies will be established within 15 days after NTP.
PDT meetings shall be held monthly to resolve issues and to apprise the affected agencies of the progress of the project. A kick-off meeting with the PDT (PDT Meeting No. 1) shall be held as soon as possible after NTP. Twenty-four (24) PDT meetings are assumed.
Assumptions
Consultant lead 24 PDT meetings
Environmental Task Lead attend 24 PDT meetings
Deliverables
Monthly Presentations (PowerPoint)
Monthly Meeting Minutes
2.2 Stakeholder Coordination Meetings
In addition to regular PDT meetings, Consultant will coordinate as needed with Caltrans, SANDAG, and other stakeholders.
Assumptions
Up to 12 Meetings for Consultant Project Manager and 6 for Environmental Task Lead
Deliverables
ATTACHMENT B 28 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge - Scope of Work
Amendment I: Preliminary Engineering
& Environmental Documentation
August 12, 2016 Page 8
EXHIBIT A‐1
Meeting Minutes
2.3 Team Meetings
The Kleinfelder design/environmental team will hold regularly scheduled internal team meetings to facilitate internal team coordination and track progress and deliverables. Team meetings will begin with an internal team kick-off meeting.
Team meetings will be monthly teleconference meetings (one hour) for the duration of this work.
Assumptions
Consultant to lead 24 Meetings
Environmental Task Lead to attend 24 Meetings
Other Task Leads to attend 6 Meetings
Task 3: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING
3.1 Research and Data Gathering
3.1.1 Gather Existing Data
Consultant will obtain and review existing maintenance reports, study reports, local street improvement/development plans, and other pertinent data.
3.1.2 Field Survey and Mapping
An aerial topographical map (digital color format with a 0.5’ resolution or better) and supplemental field surveys will be completed and assembled into an AutoCAD format base map. A digitally rectified orthographic photo, with a scale of 1”=40’ with a one-foot contour interval and half-foot supplemental contours, will be obtained/produced for this area. The “area” is 1000 feet to the east and west, and 2000 feet to the north and south of the existing Camino Del Mar Bridge.
Field surveying shall identify existing topographical features, right-of-way (including all critical points) and tie out, and any and all existing survey monuments that may be disturbed by the work. Street centerline and centerline stationing will be established to an accuracy of one-tenth (0.1) foot. Consultant shall establish one field survey datum or benchmark which was used in the design for use during construction and all elevations, dimensions, and other measurements necessary to establish proper line and grade.
Cross Sectional Information
50-foot cross sections will be obtained/produced along Camino Del Mar between Sandy Pointe and 500 feet north of the San Dieguito River. Cross sections of the abutment slopes will also be obtained/produced.
Existing driveways along Camino Del Mar between Sandy Pointe and 500 feet north of the San Dieguito River will also be profiled. The driveway profiles will extend into the existing parking lots to determine the existing drainage patterns.
ATTACHMENT B 29 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge - Scope of Work
Amendment I: Preliminary Engineering
& Environmental Documentation
August 12, 2016 Page 9
EXHIBIT A‐1
Planimetrics
Planimetrics will be obtained/produced from the aerial and will include key design features such as driveways, curb and gutter, storm drain manholes and outlets, bridge limits, sidewalks, signal equipment, building boundaries, and visible utilities. Right-of-way boundaries will be obtained/produced from record drawings.
Bridge Survey
The existing bridge will be surveyed to determine the location and elevation of the deck, soffit, sidewalk, top of railings, and utilities. Along the bridge length, these items will be surveyed every 20 feet. Columns will be surveyed at the top four corners.
River Delineation
Channel cross sections will be completed approximately 100 feet up and down stream of the bridge on a 50-foot interval (total of 5 sections). Cross section data needed will be coordinated with the hydraulic engineer. Data will be used to supplement existing information from SANDAG and update the hydraulic analysis.
Deliverables
Digital Aerial Mapping and Survey Data
Georeferenced Survey in AutoCAD Format
Georeferenced Base Mapping in AutoCAD Format
3.1.3 Right-of-Way Mapping
Existing right-of-way maps will be researched, surveyed, and transferred to the project base map. It is assumed that alternatives fall within the existing right-ofway; however, if requested Consultant will develop right-of-way plats, legal descriptions, and easement documents as an additional service.
Deliverables
Georeferenced ROW Base Map in AutoCAD Format
3.1.4 Utility Research and Mapping
Consultant will coordinate with utility owners and City utility coordination staff with respect to all utility-related matters. Consultant will provide copies of all correspondence with utility companies and other utility-related information to the City. Correspondence, as described herein, will be prepared by Consultant for either Consultant or City signature, as appropriate, and as directed by the City.
Consultant will coordinate with City staff to obtain record copies of utility maps from each utility owner within the project limits for existing and/or proposed utility facilities. Consultant will include mapping and/or exhibits that clearly define the project limits as part of the requests for utility information.
ATTACHMENT B 30 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge - Scope of Work
Amendment I: Preliminary Engineering
& Environmental Documentation
August 12, 2016 Page 10
EXHIBIT A‐1
Consultant will identify utility companies affected by the project and delineate utilities within the project’s sphere of influence on the exhibits.
A project base map will be prepared, which will include all existing utilities (above ground and below ground) identified by location, size, type, and owner, as appropriate. In addition to information provided by the owning utility companies and through research of other record maps, utility features such as manholes, valves, fire hydrants, poles, risers, etc., will be corroborated with survey data and reflected on the plans.
Assumptions
County setting monuments and filing maps with the county are excluded Deliverables
Georeferenced Utility Base Map in AutoCAD Format
3.1.5 Potholing
Consultant will perform potholing to confirm location of utilities or buried conflicts that may exist to replace the bridge. Scope assumes up to 15 potholes.
Deliverables
Pothole Data Report (Draft)
Pothole Data Report (Final)
3.1.6 Additional Topographic Survey
Consultant will perform topographic survey beyond Task 3.1.2 to support design on an as-needed basis. As-needed survey may include, but is not limited to, utilities, appurtenances, and location of potholes. Scope assumes up to 20 hours of survey time.
Deliverables
Digital Survey Data
Georeferenced Survey in AutoCAD format
3.2 Develop Preliminary Project Alternatives
3.2.1 Alternatives Identification
Consultant will identify appropriate alternatives for development and analysis.
Alternatives will be generally based on replacing the existing two-lane structure with a new structure that carries two vehicular lanes, two bike lanes, and two sidewalks. The replacement staging will be capable of maintaining vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian traffic.
Several alternatives will be documented considering variables including, but not limited to: funding program, environmental constraints, right-of-way, constructability, long-term needs, construction staging, hydraulics, and cost.
Alternatives that are considered, but rejected, will be documented as such. Up to ATTACHMENT B 31 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge - Scope of Work
Amendment I: Preliminary Engineering
& Environmental Documentation
August 12, 2016 Page 11
EXHIBIT A‐1
four alternatives will be developed as anticipated from previous work documented in the 2012 Final Camino Del Mar Strategy Report. Following are major variables that are anticipated for the alternatives that will be studied in detail during the preliminary engineering phase:
Cast-in-place vs. precast/hybrid
Reduced lane width and shared bike/vehicle lanes during construction Required profile at south end of bridge to clear 100-year flood Alternatives for study during the preliminary engineering phase will be presented to the PDT and documented in a Preliminary Project Alternatives Memorandum.
A draft matrix of alternatives will be developed, which will be updated and finalized during Task 7, Project Report.
3.2.2 Preliminary Bridge Staging Plans
Preliminary construction staging for the bridge replacement will be developed to illustrate preliminary project alternatives. Staging will consider structural geometry to ensure desired width for maintenance of traffic can be maintained, and that final condition is optimally located within the existing right-of-way.
Preliminary staging will be used to illustrate preliminary alternatives, and as the basis for alternatives assessment, within preliminary engineering tasks.
Deliverables
Preliminary Project Alternatives Presentation
Draft Matrix of Alternatives
3.3 Prepare Draft Bridge Hydraulics Report
Consultant will prepare hydraulic report and will evaluate the impact that the proposed structures may have on the river. Report will identify the general scour, and local scour that is expected at the supports. The following tasks will be performed:
3.3.1 Field Review and Data Gathering
Consultant will conduct a field review of the site as well as upstream and downstream reaches in order to observe the physical conditions and confirm existing assumptions. Consultant will obtain and review existing hydrologic and hydraulic data including flow rates, aerial photographs, topographic data, FEMA studies, proposed upstream railroad bridge, etc.
3.3.2 Hydraulic Evaluation
Consultant will prepare a hydraulic evaluation of up to three bridge alternatives using HEC-RAS. The analyses will be based on the accepted 100-year flow rates.
A debris factor will be applied to the bridge piers, if appropriate. Coordination will be performed with team members to develop alternatives that will minimize flood inundation, channel erosion, environmental impacts, and construction costs. The hydraulic analyses will be used to provide the bridge opening dimensions, low ATTACHMENT B 32 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge - Scope of Work
Amendment I: Preliminary Engineering
& Environmental Documentation
August 12, 2016 Page 12
EXHIBIT A‐1
chord elevation with consideration given to freeboard requirements, and the bridge alignment.
Consultant will perform preliminary design of the preferred bridge alternative. The design will include tasks necessary to finalize the HEC-RAS analysis of the preferred alternative. In addition, local scour analyses of the piers will be performed to determine additional protection required for these structures.
3.3.3 Sediment Transport Analysis
Consultant will prepare a sediment transport analysis to determine the general scour at the bridge. This will ensure that the bridge piers and appurtenances are adequately designed for channel bed scour. A FLUVIAL-12 analysis will be performed to determine the general scour and a summary of the FLUVIAL-12 analysis results will be included in the report.
3.3.4 Prepare Report
Consultant will prepare a report summarizing the analysis results and recommendations. A comparison of the alternatives will be included along with identification of the preferred alternative.
Assumptions
Up to two rounds of comments
Deliverables
Preliminary Hydrology and Hydraulics Report (Draft)
Preliminary Hydrology and Hydraulics Report (Final)
3.4 Preliminary Geotechnical Reports
3.4.1 Preliminary Foundation Report
The Preliminary Foundation Report (PFR) will be prepared for the proposed bridge structure in accordance with Caltrans Guidelines for Preparing Preliminary Foundation Reports. Existing cone penetration test (CPT) and boring data obtained by SANDAG during preliminary engineering for adjacent railroad bridge replacement will be used. Data includes one CPT and one resonant sonic boring at each end of the Camino Del Mar Bridge. No additional subsurface evaluation or field evaluations are included in this scope of work. Such evaluation will be scoped in Work Stage C.
The report will include a general project description, boring location plan, log of test boring (LOTB), and laboratory test results. All foundation recommendations will be in accordance with the most recent AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications and Caltrans Memos to Designers. The PFR will provide the following:
Seismic design criteria
Groundwater
ATTACHMENT B 33 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge - Scope of Work
Amendment I: Preliminary Engineering
& Environmental Documentation
August 12, 2016 Page 13
EXHIBIT A‐1
Liquefaction potential and dynamic settlement
Fill settlement
Slope stability and lateral spreading
Cast-in-drilled hole (CIDH) and/or cast-in-steel-shell (CISS) pile capacities Lateral earth pressures
Corrosion potential
Excavation characteristics
Fill materials
Pavement sections
Construction considerations, as applicable
Assessment of seismically induced liquefaction within the river channel Assessment of slope stability and seismically induced lateral spreading Any special issues regarding groundwater, difficult excavation, expansive soils, scour or other hazards encountered in the borings
Alternative types of foundations including traditional CIDH, and CIDH with permanent casing will be evaluated in consultation with the project structural engineer to allow selection of the most suitable type of foundation Structure foundation type and foundation elevations
Allowable bearing and pile capacities to evaluate the selected foundation Anticipated fill settlement periods needed to prevent excess differential settlement between the structure and adjacent roadway approaches Gradation parameters for scour analysis
3.42 Preliminary Geotechnical Report
Preliminary Geotechnical Report (PGR) will be prepared to provide roadway pavement and embankment recommendations. Existing CPT and boring data obtained by SANDAG during preliminary engineering for adjacent railroad bridge replacement will be used. The report will include a general project description, LOTB, and laboratory test results. The PGR will provide the following:
Seismic design criteria
Cut and fill requirements and any special issues regarding groundwater, difficult excavation, expansive soils or other hazards encountered in the boring Slope stability analyses on all the new slopes and recommendations for construction
ATTACHMENT B 34 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge - Scope of Work
Amendment I: Preliminary Engineering
& Environmental Documentation
August 12, 2016 Page 14
EXHIBIT A‐1
Recommendations for the reuse of excavated materials and volumes of such (swell and/or shrinkage factors to be applied) and the estimated quantity of import/export fill
Foundation and construction recommendations for the Standard Plan structures, if any (such as standard plan retaining wall)
New structural pavement sections and recommendations for connecting into the existing pavement sections
Assumptions
The two borings (Borings B-7 and B-8) and two CPT (CPT-11 and CPT-12) that were previously performed by Ninyo & Moore will be presented on LOTB sheets in accordance with Caltrans LOTB guidelines.
Up to two rounds of comments from the City and Caltrans Deliverables
Preliminary Foundation Report (Draft)
Preliminary Foundation Report (Final)
Preliminary Geotechnical Report (Draft)
Preliminary Geotechnical Report (Final)
3.5 Traffic Study
Consultant will develop a technical report to use for the basis of environmental discussion. It is assumed the replacement structure will provide one lane of traffic in each direction, similar to the existing bridge. During construction, it is anticipated the bridge will have reduced width, but staged to maintain one lane of traffic in each direction. Facilities for bicycle and pedestrian traffic will also be maintained.
The study will include two major components. The first will be to confirm the ability of proposed final condition to accommodate future traffic volumes. The second will be to assess and define construction traffic impacts and possible mitigation during construction. Vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian traffic will be considered.
3.5.1 Traffic Data
Consultant will obtain morning and afternoon peak hour traffic, pedestrian and bicycle counts at up to four intersections and daily traffic counts at up to five street segments. It is anticipated that the study will include the following intersections and street segments:
Intersections
Highway 101 - Camino Del Mar / Via De La Valle
Camino Del Mar / Coast Boulevard
ATTACHMENT B 35 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge - Scope of Work
Amendment I: Preliminary Engineering
& Environmental Documentation
August 12, 2016 Page 15
EXHIBIT A‐1
Jimmy Durante Boulevard / Via De La Valle
Jimmy Durante Boulevard / San Dieguito Drive
Street Segments
Camino Del Mar, from Via De La Valle to Coast Boulevard Camino Del Mar, from Coast Boulevard to Jimmy Durante Boulevard Jimmy Durante Boulevard, from Via De La Valle to South Fair Access Jimmy Durante Boulevard, from South Fair Access to Camino Del Mar Via De La Valle, from Highway 101 to Jimmy Durante Boulevard Consultant will conduct a field review of the existing conditions in the study area and will take photos for documentation.
Consultant will research and obtain the latest three-year accident data for the project limits. This data will be used to assess conditions during construction staging and for the proposed condition.
Assumptions
The City of Del Mar indicated that the City has recent traffic data available for this project. This scope of work assumes that data is available for the four intersections and five street segments noted above.
3.5.2 Operational Analysis
An operational analysis based on level of service (LOS) will be performed for the study intersections and street segments under the following analysis scenarios:
Existing Conditions
Existing Plus Construction Conditions
Proposed Future Conditions (Horizon Year 2040)
The Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodology will be used for the intersection analysis, and the street segments will be analyzed based on volume to capacity ratios.
Under the construction conditions scenario, it is assumed that some traffic will divert to Jimmy Durante Boulevard or I-5 to avoid delay and queuing on Camino Del Mar during the bridge construction. Consultant will manually redistribute existing traffic volumes to reflect the construction conditions.
The SANDAG Series 12 Model will be used to derive Horizon Year 2040 volumes for the study street segments and intersections. The Series 12 forecast volumes for 2035 or 2050 will be interpolated to derive Horizon Year 2040 volumes. The Series 12 Model for the years 2035 and 2050 assumes the existing two-lane capacity for Camino Del Mar south of Via De La Valle; therefore, multiple horizon year scenarios will not be necessary.
ATTACHMENT B 36 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge - Scope of Work
Amendment I: Preliminary Engineering
& Environmental Documentation
August 12, 2016 Page 16
EXHIBIT A‐1
Based on the findings of the operational analysis, potential mitigation measures will be identified to address construction conditions and proposed future condition impacts.
The project team will provide input and analysis for proposed condition. This includes evaluating traffic-related criteria as part of the bridge geometric determination. Resulting data will include traffic volumes, design speeds, and sight distance considerations.
3.5.3 Construction Conditions and Recommendations
The project team will provide input and analysis of conditions during construction and construction staging. This effort will include the following:
Prepare up to six traffic control concept exhibits for construction staging Define and describe construction activity and duration for each stage Determine delay and queuing that is expected to result from construction Identify and discuss mitigation measures that would be recommended to avoid or minimize construction impacts
Identify and define special events to avoid during construction
3.5.4 Traffic Report
A report will be prepared that summarizes the findings of the analysis and the recommendations for the proposed condition and during construction staging. The report will include, but not be limited to the following:
Project Description
Analysis Methodology
Existing Conditions
Proposed (Horizon Year 2040) Conditions
Construction Conditions
Impacts and Mitigation
Conclusions
The report will include graphics and tables that support the analysis results of the traffic study.
Assumptions
Up to two rounds of comments
Deliverables
Traffic Study (Draft)
Traffic Study (Draft Final)
ATTACHMENT B 37 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge - Scope of Work
Amendment I: Preliminary Engineering
& Environmental Documentation
August 12, 2016 Page 17
EXHIBIT A‐1
Traffic Study (Final)
3.6 Utility Conflict Matrix
Consultant will prepare a preliminary utility conflict matrix, linked to owner utility or franchise agreement records, documenting facilities in conflict with the proposed construction. Preliminary utility relocation costs will be evaluated and provided in the form of a utility protection and relocation cost estimate.
Deliverables
Above and Below Ground Preliminary Utility Conflict Matrix Preliminary Utility Cost Estimate
3.7 Roadway Concept Layouts
Consultant will prepare up to three roadway concept layouts for the considered alternatives. Each concept will include the baseline structure and condition for reference. Concepts will be coordinated with the preliminary bridge staging plans and preliminary traffic control concepts. Variables for the three roadway concepts will likely be bridge width and lateral location at the river crossing for the final condition (based on bridge staging), and bridge profile adjustments to meet hydraulic demands.
Assumptions
Up to two rounds of comments
Deliverables
Roadway Concept Layouts and Presentation Exhibits
3.8 Architectural Concept Designs
Consultant will prepare conceptual designs for enhanced architectural features within the project including bridge color (integral concrete), hand railings, pedestrian sidewalk/look out mini-plazas, and surface patterns/treatments that may be engineered into the bridge design. Scope includes researching Del Mar City themes/documents, nearby transportation architecture, and the history of the City and surrounding area. Initial submittal will be a series of hand sketch concept visualizations, up to three concepts for of each feature. Final submittal will include a refined sketch for each feature.
Assumptions
One team review session is included (architect time)
One round of revisions to each deliverable
Deliverables
Initial Aesthetic Treatment Concepts
Final Aesthetic Treatment Concept
ATTACHMENT B 38 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge - Scope of Work
Amendment I: Preliminary Engineering
& Environmental Documentation
August 12, 2016 Page 18
EXHIBIT A‐1
3.9 Advance Planning Studies
Consultant will prepare up to four Advance Planning Studies (APS) for the considered alternatives. For each APS, the deliverable will include a preliminary general plan and design memorandum identifying the design assumptions, probable construction methods, constraints, and project impact area.
Deliverables
Advance Planning Studies (Draft)
Advance Planning Studies (Final)
3.10 Preliminary Drainage Report
A Preliminary Drainage Report will be prepared to document hydrologic and hydraulic calculations necessary to complete drainage improvement plans related to the bridge replacement project. The report will evaluate the on-street flows along Camino Del Mar on the bridge and adjacent approaches. Prior to developing hydrology calculations, a thorough field reconnaissance will be conducted. Available documents pertinent to this Preliminary Drainage Report will be obtained from the City for review. The Preliminary Drainage Report will quantify the magnitude and frequency of design flows from the project area, attributable to the proposed improvements.
Assumptions
Up to three roadway concept layouts will be considered The Preliminary Drainage Report will be performed per the County Hydrology Manual Rational Method
Deliverables
Preliminary Drainage Report (Draft)
Preliminary Drainage Report (Final)
3.11 Water Quality Study
Consultant will perform a Storm Water Analysis for the proposed project in complete compliance with the latest County guidelines. The plan will include the following:
Coordination with the City and other local agencies involved regarding water quality requirements
Coordination with design team and environmental team on locations and size of Best Management Practices (BMP) such as of bioswales, biostrips, storm water detention basins, etc.
Consultant will prepare a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) equivalent to Caltrans Storm Water Data Report (SWDR) including:
Preparation of maps depicting existing conditions
ATTACHMENT B 39 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge - Scope of Work
Amendment I: Preliminary Engineering
& Environmental Documentation
August 12, 2016 Page 19
EXHIBIT A‐1
Preparation of preliminary BMP plans
Preparation of report and documentation
Assumptions
This subtask does not include coordination or processing with Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB).
Deliverables
NPDES Decision Tree and SWDR or Equivalent (Draft)
NPDES Decision Tree and SWDR or Equivalent (Final)
3.12 Prepare Preliminary Environmental Study (PES)
Once the build alternatives to carry forward as part of the Project Approval/ Environmental Document (PA/ED) phase have been identified by the project team, a current Caltrans Preliminary Environmental Study (PES) form will be prepared for submittal to the City first and then to Caltrans for review. The purpose of the PES is to identify and receive concurrence from Caltrans regarding the technical studies that will need to be prepared for the proposed project and to receive concurrence regarding the environmental document to be prepared. The PES will be prepared using existing, available information prior to completion of Task 4. As directed in the PES, cultural information will be provided entirely by Caltrans. One revision to the PES will be provided following the field review meeting and Caltrans review. Figures will include a vicinity map, a location map, and the project layouts. The PES will also include an ISA Checklist, Flood Insurance Rate Map, and Visual Assessment Guide checklist.
Deliverables
Preliminary Environmental Study (Draft)
Preliminary Environmental Study (Final)
3.13 Field Review Meeting
An initial informal field review meeting was completed March 2012 when this project was programmed for rehabilitation. A formal field review meeting will be held that will include Caltrans, City, Consultant, and other representatives as applicable. The purpose of the formal field review will be to:
Gather representatives from various involved or interested agencies including regional/permitting agencies, utilities, metropolitan planning organizations (SANDAG), and Caltrans to discuss project alternatives to be considered for environmental studies
Secure agreement on general design features or exceptions to AASHTO/Caltrans standards
Identify and confirm pedestrian facility and ADA needs ATTACHMENT B 40 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge - Scope of Work
Amendment I: Preliminary Engineering
& Environmental Documentation
August 12, 2016 Page 20
EXHIBIT A‐1
Identify and discuss right-of-way needs
Confirm approach for technical studies to support the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) document
Discuss programming, funding, and schedule
It is understood the District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) will lead the field review. Consultant will prepare for, schedule, attend, and document the field review meeting in support of Caltrans and the City. In preparation for the meeting, Consultant will provide Field Review Form (7-B, 7-C, and 7-D), Draft PES, and summary from preliminary engineering effort including alternative sketches.
Task 4: ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNICAL STUDIES
This task includes the preparation of technical studies expected to be needed to support the environmental review process. The task includes overall management of the technical specialists and preparation of individual technical reports, as described below.
All technical studies will be consistent with the requirements of NEPA and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as well as those of related environmental statutes and regulations. The technical studies will be prepared to cover both related statutory documentation requirements and to support preparation of NEPA and CEQA documents required for project approval. The scope of the technical studies will be reviewed and confirmed with the City and Caltrans at the field review meeting.
Preparation of technical analyses and reports will follow local, state, and federal environmental guidelines, primarily consisting of the Caltrans SER website, Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual, local and Federal Highway Association (FHWA) Technical Advisory 6640.81, Guidance on Preparing and Processing Environmental and Section 4(f) Documents. The formats to be used for the technical studies will follow the guidance available on the Caltrans SER website as of the date that those studies are initiated.
Unless indicated, the reports will be formatted to allow a single report to meet the needs of Caltrans and the City in conducting their respective environmental reviews. Technical studies include a standardized project description, a methodology relevant to each topic area, description of the affected environment, impact assessment, and mitigation measures. The administrative draft technical study will be submitted to the City (electronically) and then to Caltrans (three copies) for review. Upon receipt of comments from City and Caltrans, the revised technical studies will be submitted to the City (electronically) and to Caltrans (three copies) for concurrent review.
Following Caltrans and City second review, a revisions workshop will be held, if needed, to address any outstanding comments. Following the revisions workshop, if needed, a final version of each report will be prepared. The final technical studies will be submitted (electronically to City and three copies to Caltrans) for final concurrence (no additional comments are assumed to be received associated with the final concurrence review).
If substantial changes to the project description occur subsequent to the first draft of the technical studies, additional costs may be involved. If additional analysis is required, a scope of work and cost will be submitted for approval prior to initiation.
ATTACHMENT B 41 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge - Scope of Work
Amendment I: Preliminary Engineering
& Environmental Documentation
August 12, 2016 Page 21
EXHIBIT A‐1
4.1 Technical Studies Management
Consultant will coordinate the overall preparation of technical studies. This work will include: (1) coordination with technical specialists to assure the timely flow of information needed to meet schedules, and (2) reviewing technical studies to assure that the studies are consistent with one another, and meet needs of the environmental review process.
4.2 Project Description
Consultant will draft a preliminary project description to form the basis for the project descriptions within each technical report. The project description will be reviewed and approved by the City and Caltrans prior to distribution to technical consultants.
Assumptions
See deliverable schedule at end of Task 4
Deliverables
Memo with Project Description
4.3 Wetlands Delineation
Consultant will complete a wetlands delineation map to the extent of potential jurisdictional waters and wetlands, including waters of the U.S. subject to the regulatory jurisdiction of the United States Corps of Engineers (USACE) pursuant to Rivers and Harbors Act Section 10 and/or Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 404; waters of the State subject to the regulatory jurisdiction of the RWQCB pursuant to CWA Section 401; streambed and riparian habitat subject to the regulatory jurisdiction of the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) pursuant to California Fish and Game Code Sections 1600 et seq.; and coastal wetlands subject to the regulatory jurisdiction of the California Coastal Commission (CCC) pursuant to the California Coastal Act. The delineation will be conducted in accordance with current regulatory guidelines and protocols. The area to be surveyed will include the footprint of the new bridge plus 200 feet on either side.
The results of the delineation will be presented in a report that will include mapping of any wetland areas and jurisdictional areas. Consultant will coordinate with the USACE, RWQCB, CDFW, and CCC to gain concurrence on the wetland delineations within their respective jurisdictions.
Assumptions
See deliverable schedule at end of Task 4
Deliverables
Wetlands Delineation Report
ATTACHMENT B 42 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge - Scope of Work
Amendment I: Preliminary Engineering
& Environmental Documentation
August 12, 2016 Page 22
EXHIBIT A‐1
4.4 Lagoon Health Assessment
Considering the intent of the San Dieguito Lagoon Restoration, Consultant will evaluate proposed structure replacement impacts on sediment transport within the lagoon. Using the hydraulic modeling assumptions in Task 3.3, up to three alternatives will be evaluated. The evaluation will be summarized in a report that includes description of the lagoon sediment transport for the existing condition, and the proposed conditions. The summary will include figures as appropriate to illustrate the lagoon area and the existing and proposed bridge configurations.
Analysis results will be provided in table format, and digital modeling data will be provided as an appendix.
Assumptions
See deliverable schedule at end of Task 4
Deliverables
Lagoon Health Assessment Report
4.5 Historical Property Survey Report and Archaeological Survey Report Consultant will prepare a Historical Property Survey Report (HPSR) and an Archaeological Survey Report (ASR), based on an Area of Potential Effects (APE) exhibit for approval by the City and Caltrans. The map will include Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APNs) with clearly delineated property boundary lines and be prepared in accordance with Caltrans requirements including scale, format, and signature lines.
Because compliance with National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) is accepted by California as evidence of CEQA compliance, Consultant will implement the consultation process specified in the NHPA regulations (36 CFR 800) by following the detailed guidance set forth in Caltrans Standard Environmental Reference, Volume 2: Cultural (SER). This will also result in NEPA compliance with respect to cultural resources.
The work will include:
Prepare and coordinate APE map with Caltrans
Obtain record search to determine the existence of previously recorded resources
Request a Sacred Lands File search from the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC)
Contact the Tribal contacts identified by the NAHC to identify Tribal Cultural Resources or other concerns
Prepare log of Native American contact results
Conduct research to prepare the HPSR and ASR
Conduct and intensive field survey of the APE
Prepare Historic Properties Survey Report and Archaeological Survey Report Coordinate with Caltrans relative to the Section 106 process ATTACHMENT B 43 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge - Scope of Work
Amendment I: Preliminary Engineering
& Environmental Documentation
August 12, 2016 Page 23
EXHIBIT A‐1
Assumptions
See deliverable schedule at end of Task 4
Deliverables
Historical Property Survey Report (Draft)
Historical Property Survey Report (Final)
Archaeological Survey Report (Draft)
Archaeological Survey Report (Final)
APE Exhibit (Draft)
APE Exhibit (Final
4.6 Environmental Site Assessment
Consultant will perform a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) in general accordance with ASTM E 1527-05, Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments, and will include the following:
Review of regulatory agency and other records
Site reconnaissance
Historical information research of previous site uses and surrounding area Past and present interviews of site owners to obtain information indicating Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs)
Prepare a Report of Findings for the site, including illustrations, photographs, and pertinent regulatory agency documentation.
Assumptions
See deliverable schedule at end of Task 4
Deliverables
Phase I ESA Report
4.7 Species Surveys
Consultant will complete required focused surveys to determine the presence/absence of sensitive plant and animal species within the project’s biological study area, which, in the absence of concurrence from Caltrans, is expected to include the bridge and areas within 200 feet of the bridge.
4.7.1 Sensitive Plants
Consultant will conduct rare plant surveys in the spring (April or May) and summer (June or July) to coincide with blooming periods of potentially occurring sensitive plant species. The results of the survey will be documented in the Natural Environmental Study (NES).
ATTACHMENT B 44 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge - Scope of Work
Amendment I: Preliminary Engineering
& Environmental Documentation
August 12, 2016 Page 24
EXHIBIT A‐1
Caulerpa Survey
Consultant will conduct a survey for the invasive exotic alga, Caulerpa taxifolia, in accordance with the Caulerpa Control Protocol (Version 4.0, adopted February 25, 2008). The results of the survey will be documented in a brief report and included in the NES.
Eelgrass Survey
Consultant will conduct a survey for eelgrass (Zostera marina), in accordance with the Southern California Eelgrass Mitigation Policy (Revision 11). The results of the survey will be documented in a brief report and included in the NES.
4.7.2 Sensitive Animals
Based on previous surveys of the bridge area, Consultant expects that focused, presence/absence and protocol-level surveys could be required within the biological study area for the following sensitive animals: Belding’s savannah sparrow (Passerculus sandwichensis beldingi), California least tern (Sternula antillarum browni), coastal California gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica californica), Pacific pocket mouse (Perognathus longimembris pacificus), Ridgeway’s rail (Rallus obsoletus) and western snowy plover (Charadrius nivosus ssp. nivosus) The final determination of which federally-listed species will require surveys will be made during initial Caltrans coordination with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS).
Surveys will be performed in accordance with current USFWS and CDFW protocol, unless otherwise determined in consultation with these agencies. The results of the survey will be documented in a brief report and included in the NES.
Deliverables
Survey Documentation (Draft)
Survey Documentation (Final)
4.8 Biological Assessment
Consultant will prepare an NES consistent with Caltrans requirements. The NES will describe biological resources within the biological study area; incorporate the results of the wetland delineation in Task 4.3 and sensitive species surveys conducted in Task 4.7; quantify and analyze project impacts; and recommend mitigation measures to offset those impacts. The NES will address up to two project alternatives.
Assumptions
See deliverable schedule at end of Task 4
Deliverables
Natural Environment Study (Draft)
ATTACHMENT B 45 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge - Scope of Work
Amendment I: Preliminary Engineering
& Environmental Documentation
August 12, 2016 Page 25
EXHIBIT A‐1
Natural Environment Study (Final)
4.9 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas
Consultant will prepare an air quality and greenhouse gas (GHG) assessment for the project. Conformity with the Clean Air Act for regional operational emissions will be demonstrated by documenting that the project is consistent with the air quality analysis of the most recently approved SANDAG Regional Transportation Improvement Program and Regional Transportation Plan. Local emissions will be addressed in accordance with Caltrans Transportation Project Level Carbon Monoxide (CO) Protocol, if necessary.
Construction related emissions will be developed using EMFAC emission factors and compared with the federal Clean Air Act conformity de Minimis thresholds and the San Diego County Air Pollution Control District (SDAPCD) Air Quality Impact Analysis Guidelines. Dust control requirements and abatement measures consistent with the City and SDAPCD policies and regulations will be included in the analysis.
Assumptions
See deliverable schedule at end of Task 4
Deliverables
Air Quality and GHG Report
4.10 Noise Study
Consultant will prepare a noise study report (NSR) in accordance with Caltrans Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol and in the Standard Environmental Report (SER) format. Before starting the NSR, Consultant will prepare a work plan for City and Caltrans concurrence that includes a description of the proposed noise analysis methodology, assumptions, and noise abatement criteria.
The work will begin with an initial screening analysis to determine impact from potential construction noise or potential future traffic noise from the bridge and bridge approaches under both the noise abatement criteria (NAC) and City of Del Mar CEQA requirements. If no potential impacts are discovered, a noise screening report will be written and work terminated. If either potential construction or traffic noise impacts are identified, a full NSR will be prepared.
Consultant will conduct a field inspection within the project limits and conduct short-term (20-minute period) traffic noise model calibration measurements with simultaneous traffic counts at two measurement locations. In addition, long-term (continuous 24-hour period) measurements will be conducted at sensitive receptors in the four quadrants of the existing bridge area to define existing traffic noise levels and to calibrate the noise model.
The FHWA Traffic Noise Model (TNM) Version 2.5 will be used to model the existing bridge and approach roadway as a calibration point, using the traffic counts and measured noise levels obtained from Task 3.3. Consultant will update the TNM ATTACHMENT B 46 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge - Scope of Work
Amendment I: Preliminary Engineering
& Environmental Documentation
August 12, 2016 Page 26
EXHIBIT A‐1
model, as necessary, to include proposed bridge and approach roadway changes.
LOS C traffic flow conditions will be used as a basis for estimating the future traffic noise levels at the identified outdoor use areas along the project limits. It is anticipated that up to 10 receptors (including habitat areas) will be modeled and evaluated.
Consultant will determine whether estimated exterior noise levels at the outdoor use areas at the receptors will exceed the NAC and the appropriate City of Del Mar and CEQA standards. If so, Consultant will identify conceptual noise abatement techniques. A formal Noise Abatement Program will not be prepared.
Construction noise and vibration will also be qualitatively addressed in terms of potential impacts to humans, wildlife, and marine life.
The results of the analysis will be summarized in a report prepared in accordance with the Annotated NSR Outline contained on the Caltrans Standard Environmental Reference website (as of March 21, 2013). Consultant will make up to two rounds of revisions to the NSR in response to collective comments received from Caltrans and the City.
Assumptions
See deliverable schedule at end of Task 4
Deliverables
Noise Study Report (Draft)
Noise Study Report (Final)
4.11 Section 4(f) Evaluation
Consultant will document the presence/absence of 4(f)-protected resources within the proposed project’s APE including publicly owned park or recreation areas, wildlife or waterfowl refuge of national, state or local significance, and/or any land of an historic site of national, state, or local significance (as determined by the federal, state, or local officials having jurisdiction over the park, area, refuge, or site). If 4(f) protected resources are identified in the project area, Consultant will evaluate potential direct and indirect impacts to 4(f) resources resulting from the project.
If determined with Caltrans that no 4(f) resources would be affected by the project, Consultant will prepare a “No Effect” memorandum in accordance with Caltrans requirements documenting: (1) 4(f) properties identified in the project area, and (2) that the project will not result in a “use” of such properties.
Consultant will ensure that the memorandum meets the format and content requirements of Caltrans.
If it is determined that use of 4(f) resource(s) will occur as a result of the project and Caltrans determines that preparation of de minimis impact findings is required, Consultant will prepare documentation in the form of a memorandum to ATTACHMENT B 47 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge - Scope of Work
Amendment I: Preliminary Engineering
& Environmental Documentation
August 12, 2016 Page 27
EXHIBIT A‐1
support de minimis impact findings. The memorandum will address the following:
Applicability of Section 4(f) property proposed to be used by the project A description of the use of the 4(f) property
An explanation of why the use is de minimis
Records of public involvement or Section 106 consultation Any avoidance, minimization, and/or mitigation measures that are relied upon to make the de minimis finding
Results of coordination with the official(s) with jurisdiction including written concurrence from official(s) with jurisdiction.
Caltrans will provide information regarding the public involvement and Section 106 consultation and will be responsible for coordination with the officials with jurisdiction over the property.
Up to two rounds of revisions to the Section 4(f) memorandum will be made based on the collective comments of the City and Caltrans.
Assumptions
See deliverable schedule at end of Task 4
Deliverables
Section 4(f) No Effect Memorandum or 4(f) de minimis Impact Findings Memorandum (Draft)
Section 4(f) No Effect Memorandum or 4(f) de minimis Impact Findings Memorandum (Final)
4.12 Community Impacts Technical Memorandum
Consultant will prepare a Community Impacts (CIA) Technical Memorandum in accordance with Caltrans content and format requirements. The memorandum will evaluate potential community impacts within the project area, including access, parking, community character, sensitive land uses (pertaining to potential construction impacts, noise and vibration, traffic, air quality, and aesthetics); compatibility with major land use plans and regulations; and community impacts (related to Environmental Justice communities, community character, community cohesion, and acquisition).
Up to two rounds of revisions to the CIA will be made based on the collective comments from the City and Caltrans.
Assumptions
See deliverable schedule at end of Task 4
Deliverables
ATTACHMENT B 48 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge - Scope of Work
Amendment I: Preliminary Engineering
& Environmental Documentation
August 12, 2016 Page 28
EXHIBIT A‐1
CIA Technical Memorandum (Draft)
CIA Technical Memorandum (Final)
4.13 Visual Impact Assessment
Consultant will prepare a Visual Impact Assessment (VIA) based on FHWA Visual Impact Assessment for Highway Project guidelines. The analysis will evaluate the visual impact of the project from up to four key viewpoints. The VIA will describe the existing visual characteristics of the area and identify any significant visual resources. The potential visual impacts from project construction and use of the replaced bridge will be evaluated through the use of ground level photographs from the key viewpoints. Visual conditions and project impacts will be quantified as required in the VIA guidelines for highway projects. Mitigation measures will be recommended, if necessary, to reduce significant impacts.
The VIA report will include viewshed maps and character/quality unit mapping and typical photos of the adjacent visual environment. It will also include mass diagram/model wireframes for each alternative being considered. These wireframes will be added over site photos. Detailed visual simulations will be provided for the preferred project. Up to four views will be created of the preferred alternative. An existing photo, proposed unmitigated, and a mitigated version will be provided. The VIA will be reviewed and signed by a licensed Landscape Architect.
Up to two rounds of revisions to the VIA will be made based on the collective comments of the City and Caltrans.
4.14 Conceptual Mitigation Plan
Consultant will prepare a conceptual mitigation plan to address potential options for compensating project impacts on sensitive natural communities and jurisdictional waters and wetlands. At a minimum, the plan will identify on- and/or offsite mitigation areas, mitigation type (i.e., establishment/re-establishment, rehabilitation, enhancement, preservation); conceptual plant palette(s); and conceptual performance standards.
Assumptions
See deliverable schedule at end of Task 4
Deliverables
Conceptual Mitigation Plan (Draft)
Conceptual Mitigation Plan (Final)
Task 4 Assumptions
All technical studies will have the following deliverable quantities Administrative Draft Technical Studies (3 copies each) Draft Technical Studies (3 copies each)
ATTACHMENT B 49 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge - Scope of Work
Amendment I: Preliminary Engineering
& Environmental Documentation
August 12, 2016 Page 29
EXHIBIT A‐1
Final Technical Studies for Concurrence (3 copies each) Final Approved Technical Studies (3 copies each)
Task 5: PUBLIC OUTREACH
The Camino Del Mar Bridge is a key connection point to Del Mar, and is located within one of the community's most valued assets, the San Dieguito Lagoon. The goal of this task is to assist the City with informing the public about the importance of the bridge replacement project, identify the community’s key issues and concerns, and provide information to the community on project status and design options for the proposed bridge.
Input from the public will be incorporated into the decision making process pertaining to design aesthetics and location of the new bridge.
5.1 Public Meetings
Consultant will attend and work closely with City staff to develop meeting agendas, presentations, and meeting materials for up to four public outreach meetings.
Consultant will attend two of the City Council meetings. Consultant will coordinate and facilitate meetings and maintain notes that can be shared with the public after review by City staff.
5.2 Information Exchange
Consultant will support Del Mar with content for City website updates that will allow for direct interaction with the community. The content will assist with educating the public about the project progress and timeline. It will also enable distribution of environmental study information and allow participation in the CEQA/NEPA process. A survey to enable the community to easily provide their input on bridge aesthetics and the new alignment will be developed, distributed, and evaluated once the project is structurally developed.
Deliverables
Meeting Materials
Bridge Aesthetics Survey
Task 6: ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT
Consultant will prepare documentation needed pursuant to CEQA and work with Caltrans to support the environmental review requirements of NEPA. Based on the assumption that no significant, unmitigable environmental impacts or significant public controversy associated with the project would be anticipated, an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) will be prepared under CEQA. A Categorical Exemption (CE) prepared by Caltrans is anticipated to meet the requirements of NEPA.
6.1 Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
Consultant will prepare an administrative draft IS/MND using the environmental checklist form included as Appendix G of the CEQA guidelines (or other format preferred by the City). The document will be prepared in a narrative format that describes the environmental setting for the study area, summarizes the results of the ATTACHMENT B 50 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge - Scope of Work
Amendment I: Preliminary Engineering
& Environmental Documentation
August 12, 2016 Page 30
EXHIBIT A‐1
technical studies, identifies potential impacts resulting from the proposed project, and recommends mitigation measures (as appropriate). Each issue area will be evaluated at a suitable level of detail to address potential impacts of the proposed project and the ability of mitigation to reduce impacts to less than significant. The IS will only analyze the preferred project alternative at a full level of detail. An administrative draft IS will be submitted to the City for review and comment.
6.2 Public Review
After the City completes its review of the administrative draft IS/MND, Consultant will incorporate comments into a Draft IS/MND for public review. Consultant will also prepare a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration. It is assumed that the City will print and distribute the IS/MND for public review including placing an announcement in the local newspaper. This scope assumes that no substantial changes in the project description occur after work starts on the IS.
6.3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan
A Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan (MMRP) and Environmental Commitments Record (ECR) will be prepared by Consultant that summarizes all of the project mitigation measures, the responsible parties for implementing each measure, and the timing for each measure. The MMRP will be included as an appendix to the final environmental document.
6.4 Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
After the close of the public comment period, Consultant will review the public and agency comments with the City, compile and number all substantive comments, and provide written responses for each comment provided. Consultant will provide the City with a draft set of responses to comments for review and approval.
Consultant will modify the draft IS/MND, if required, in response to public comment in order to prepare the Final IS/MND. The responses and document modifications assume no additional research is required.
Consultant will prepare a Notice of Determination for the City to file with the appropriate agencies.
6.5 NEPA Support
Consultant will coordinate with Caltrans to provide the documentation needed to complete the NEPA process. In concert with Caltrans and City staff, Consultant will determine specific formatting or content of technical reports to assure that they will meet the requirements of NEPA as well as CEQA.
In addition, Consultant will prepare a federal Coastal Consistency Certification addressing the proposed project’s consistency with the planning and management policies contained in Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act.
Task 7: PROJECT REPORT
7.1 Draft Project Report
ATTACHMENT B 51 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge - Scope of Work
Amendment I: Preliminary Engineering
& Environmental Documentation
August 12, 2016 Page 31
EXHIBIT A‐1
Using data from Tasks 2 through 5, Consultant will complete a Draft Project Report to describe and document the project and alternative solutions. The report will include description of purpose and need, and discuss initial alternative development and conceptual alternative analysis. It will identify costs and identify impacts of the alternatives. The report will include discussion of environmental considerations, utilities, right-of-way, hydraulics, traffic management, design exceptions, and adherence to ADA standards. The report will provide a summary of the rationale for selecting the preferred alternative, and include schedule and cost details for the preferred alternative.
Deliverables
Draft Project Report
7.2 Final Project Report
Consultant will coordinate review of the Draft Project Report with the City and Caltrans. Comments will be reviewed and responses incorporated. Report will be updated and finalized.
Deliverables
Final Project Report
Task 8: 30% DESIGN BASIS
8.1 Geometric Approval Drawings
Geometric drawings of the preferred alternative shall be prepared in accordance with Caltrans District 11 GAD requirements near the end of the Environmental Document phase of the project. It is assumed that only the preferred alternative will be refined to the level of Geometric Approval Drawings (GAD). These will include plans, typical cross sections, profiles, and superelevation diagrams. The GAD will include appropriate signature blocks and traffic volume data shown on large sheets to clearly present the overall geometric design rather than on 11” x 17” sheet breakouts with matchlines.
The drawings will reflect Caltrans and City/SANDAG standards and criteria for this type of facility. Any nonstandard design elements will be documented in the appropriate Fact Sheet documents.
Deliverables
Draft Geometric Approval Drawings
Final Geometric Approval Drawings
8.2 Structure Type Selection Report
A type selection report including a general plan, foundation plan, design memo, design checklist and a general plan estimate for the proposed structures will be submitted for review and approval. Only one alignment alternative will be considered for the bridge type selection. A type selection review meeting may be held in which the Consultant shall be prepared to discuss and provide information ATTACHMENT B 52 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge - Scope of Work
Amendment I: Preliminary Engineering
& Environmental Documentation
August 12, 2016 Page 32
EXHIBIT A‐1
on foundation requirements, falsework requirements, seismic and aesthetic considerations, traffic handling, construction cost, and other pertinent information that is needed to determine the proper structure type.
Ten copies of the type selection report including the proposed general plan, foundation plan, general plan estimate, type selection memo and a vicinity map shall be submitted for review four weeks prior to the structure type selection review meeting. The results of the meeting will be summarized in writing by the Consultant within two weeks following the meeting.
Deliverables
Draft Structure Type Selection Report
Final Structure Type Selection Report
VI. ADDITIONAL SERVICES
Additional services may be required that will be determined as this phase proceeds. Consultant shall not proceed with work considered to be outside the scope defined in Section IV without prior approval from the City of Del Mar. Optional services may include study of additional replacement alternatives, elevated environmental documentation, additional technical studies, funding studies, esthetic concepts, meetings beyond those defined above, and other items not defined above.
VII. WORK TO BE PERFORMED BY THE CITY
The City will be responsible for the management, control and execution of this contract, including the tasks listed below.
ADMINISTRATIVE TASKS
1. Issue written Notice to Proceed.
2. Make progress payments and final payment to the Consultant.
3. Answer all questions of project definition and the scope when required by the Consultant.
4. Review progress reports.
5. Make evaluation of Consultant’s contract performance.
6. Answer correspondence sent by the Consultant.
7. Call and conduct the joint meeting, if necessary, to discuss the engineering and/or environmental activities that are being studied.
8. Handle all inquiries from the public, media, and other agencies.
9. Process federal forms and requests related to project funding.
ENGINEERING TASKS
1. Review, concur, and/or approve all submittals.
2. Print and distribute reports, findings, and related documents prepared by Consultant.
OTHER TASKS
ATTACHMENT B 53 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge - Scope of Work
Amendment I: Preliminary Engineering
& Environmental Documentation
August 12, 2016 Page 33
EXHIBIT A‐1
1. Obtain general plan conformance certification as required.
VIII. DESIGN STANDARDS
The preliminary plans / technical report and environmental document, shall be prepared in accordance with current Caltrans regulations, policies, procedures, manuals, and standards including compliance with FHWA requirements and/or City and County Road Standards as appropriate. The technical report prepared in support of the environmental document will follow the format for Caltrans Project Report (PR). Improvements of local roads may be prepared in accordance with City standards in lieu of Caltrans standards as directed by the City. Consultant will prepare fact sheets for COUNTY approval, documenting the exceptions to mandatory and advisory design standards. All documents shall be prepared using English Standard Units and dimensions.
ENVIRONMENTAL
The procedures to be followed and the content of the environmental surveys, environmental technical reports, and environmental documents are set forth in Caltrans Project Development Procedures Manual (PDPM), Caltrans Environmental Handbook, Caltrans Transportation Laboratory technical manuals for environmental studies, FHWA’s Technical Advisory T6640.8A, and Caltrans SER on the Caltrans website. Federal and state requirements for environmental analysis and impact assessment, as set forth in NEPA, CEQA, and other applicable federal and state regulations, will be satisfied.
DESIGN
Roadway design will be in accordance with the current Caltrans Highway Design Manual and its revisions and/or City Road Standards as appropriate. Traffic design will be in accordance with the California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD). The Draft Geotechnical Design Report will be prepared in conformance with the current edition of the State Manual of Test, California Test Method 130.
IX. PAYMENT OF FEE FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES
Consultant’s billings shall be segregated according to the following cost categories:
TASK 1: Project Management $115,433.53
TASK 2: Coordination and Meetings $187,723.95
TASK 3: Preliminary Engineering $353,186.63
TASK 4: General Environmental Studies $300,950.03
TASK 5: Public Outreach $39,031.23
TASK 6: Environmental Document $89,024.19
TASK 7: Project Report $56,935.60
TASK 8: 30% Design Basis $74,048.78
ATTACHMENT B 54 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge - Scope of Work
Amendment I: Preliminary Engineering
& Environmental Documentation
August 12, 2016 Page 34
EXHIBIT A‐1
X. METHOD OF PAYMENT
A. Payment for Tasks 1 through 8 of Work Stage B listed above shall be at a time-andmaterials (cost reimbursement) basis and shall be made in accordance with Section IX “Consultant’s Fee” of the Agreement.
NOTE:
The Not to Exceed fee $1,216,333.95 shall be effective based on the schedule herein assuming notice to proceed no later than December 31, 2016.
B. Additional services (if required) and payment will be authorized by the change order or by the contract amendment per Section 14 “Work Changes or Revisions” of the Agreement.
XI. PROJECT SCHEDULE
Calendar Days
Activity Allowed
TASKS 1-2 730 (1)
TASK 3 160 (1)
TASK 4 270 (2 – Task 3)
TASK 5 As directed by City
TASK 6 150 (2 – Task 4)
TASK 7 150 (2 – Task 4)
TASK 8 50 (2 – Task 7)
(1) Calendar days after receipt of Notice-to-Proceed for Activity (2) Calendar days after receipt of approval of previous submittal APPROVALS:
____________________________________ __________________
DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING DATE
Tim Thiele, City Engineer
____________________________________ __________________
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE
Eric Minicilli, Director of Public Works
ATTACHMENT B 55 June 16, 2026 Item 6
ATTACHMENT B 56 June 16, 2026 Item 6
ID Task Name Duration Start Finish
1 Work Stage
A ‐ Rehabilitation Strategy 1349 days Wed 2/15/12 Mon 4/17/17 2 City Contract / NTP
0 days Wed 2/15/12 Wed 2/15/12
3 Develop Rehabilitation Strategy Report 141 days Wed 2/15/12 Wed 8/29/124 Review by City and Caltrans 39 days Thu 8/30/12 Tue 10/23/125 Caltrans Rehabilitation Strategy Concurrence 2 days Wed 10/24/12 Thu 10/25/126 Final Strategy Report 13 days Fri 10/26/12 Tue 11/13/127 Project Coordination & Funding with SANDAG
0 days Wed 10/24/12 Wed 10/24/12
8 Caltrans SLA Funding Meeting
0 days Mon 12/10/12 Mon 12/10/12
9 Geotechnical Borings (SANDAG)
0 days Wed 5/8/13 Wed 5/8/13
10 Geotechnical Documentation (SANDAG)
0 days Wed 1/28/15 Wed 1/28/15
11 Caltrans SLA Funding Meting
0 days Thu 9/24/15 Thu 9/24/15
12 Identify Funding Opportunities and Approval for Phase B 1154 days Wed 11/14/12 Mon 4/17/17
13 Work Stage
B ‐ Preliminary Engineering
& Environmental 523 days Tue 4/18/17 Thu 4/18/19
14 City Contract / NTP 1 day Tue 4/18/17 Tue 4/18/1715 Mobilization 10 days Wed 4/19/17 Tue 5/2/1716 Task 1: Project Management 522 days Wed 4/19/17 Thu 4/18/1917 Task 2: Coordination and Meetings 502 days Wed 5/17/17 Thu 4/18/1918 PDT Meetings 502 days Wed 5/17/17 Thu 4/18/1919 Task 3: Preliminary Engineering 150 days Wed 5/3/17 Tue 11/28/1720 Research & Data Gathering 50 days Wed 5/3/17 Tue 7/11/17
21 Develop Preliminary Project Alternatives 30 days Wed 7/12/17 Tue 8/22/1722 Prepare Draft Bridge Hydraulics Report 30 days Wed 8/23/17 Tue 10/3/1723 Preliminary Geotechnical Reports 40 days Wed 8/23/17 Tue 10/17/1724 Traffic Study 30 days Wed 8/23/17 Tue 10/3/1725 Utility Conflict Matrix 30 days Wed 8/23/17 Tue 10/3/1726 Roadway Concept Layouts 40 days Wed 8/23/17 Tue 10/17/1727 Architectural Concept Designs 15 days Wed 9/27/17 Tue 10/17/1728 Advanced Planning Studies 30 days Wed 10/18/17 Tue 11/28/1729 Preliminary Drainage Report 15 days Wed 9/27/17 Tue 10/17/1730 Water Quality Study 15 days Wed 10/18/17 Tue 11/7/1731 Preliminary Environmental Study (PES) 46 days Wed 8/23/17 Wed 10/25/1732 Prepare Draft PES 15 days Wed 8/23/17 Tue 9/12/1733 City Review 1st Draft PES 10 days Wed 9/13/17 Tue 9/26/1734 Revise PES 5 days Wed 9/27/17 Tue 10/3/1735 City submit PES to Caltrans 1 day Wed 10/4/17 Wed 10/4/1736 Caltrans Review and Approval of PES 15 days Thu 10/5/17 Wed 10/25/1737 Field Review 1 day Thu 10/5/17 Thu 10/5/1738 Task 4: Environmental Technical Studies 270 days Wed 8/23/17 Tue 9/4/1839 Environmental Study Management 270 days Wed 8/23/17 Tue 9/4/1840 Project Description 5 days Wed 11/29/17 Tue 12/5/1741 Wetlands Delineation 40 days Wed 12/6/17 Tue 1/30/1842 Lagoon Health Assessment 30 days Wed 12/6/17 Tue 1/16/1843 HPSR and ASR 40 days Wed 12/6/17 Tue 1/30/1844 Environmental Site Assessment 40 days Wed 12/6/17 Tue 1/30/1845 Species Surveys 80 days Wed 8/23/17 Tue 12/12/17 2/15
10/24
12/10
5/8
1/28
9/24
H1 H2 H1 H2 H1 H2 H1 H2 H1 H2 H1 H2 H1 H2 H1 H2 H1 H2 H1 H2 H1 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
CAMINO DEL MAR BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
1 of 3 Date Revised: 032317
ATTACHMENT B
57 June 16, 2026 Item 6
ID Task Name Duration Start Finish
46 Biological Assessment 60 days Wed 1/31/18 Tue 4/24/18 47 Air Quality
& Greenhouse Gas 40 days Wed 12/6/17 Tue 1/30/18
48 Noise Study 40 days Wed 12/6/17 Tue 1/30/1849 Section 4(f) Evaluation 30 days Wed 12/6/17 Tue 1/16/1850 Community Impacts Technical Memorandum 30 days Wed 1/17/18 Tue 2/27/1851 Visual Impact Assessment 30 days Wed 12/6/17 Tue 1/16/1852 Conceptual Mitigation Plan 20 days Wed 4/25/18 Tue 5/22/1853 City & Caltrans Review Draft Technical Studies 30 days Wed 5/23/18 Tue 7/3/18 54 2nd Draft Technical Studies 20 days Wed 7/4/18 Tue 7/31/1855 Caltrans Final Review Technical Studies 15 days Wed 8/1/18 Tue 8/21/1856 Final Technical Studies 10 days Wed 8/22/18 Tue 9/4/1857 Task 5: Public Outreach 300 days Wed 11/29/17 Tue 1/22/1958 Public Meetings 300 days Wed 11/29/17 Tue 1/22/1959 Information Exchange 120 days Wed 11/29/17 Tue 5/15/1860 Task 6: Environmental Document 150 days Wed 9/5/18 Tue 4/2/1961 Admin Draft Initial Study (IS) & Mitigated Negative Declaration 15 days Wed 9/5/18 Tue 9/25/18 62 City Admin Draft IS
& MND Review 20 days Wed 9/26/18 Tue 10/23/18
63 Response to Comments and Resubmittal 10 days Wed 10/24/18 Tue 11/6/1864 City IS & MND Review 10 days Wed 11/7/18 Tue 11/20/18
65 Finalize IS
& MND 5 days Wed 11/21/18 Tue 11/27/18
66 City distributes IS and MND for public review 5 days Wed 11/28/18 Tue 12/4/1867 Public Review Period 30 days Wed 12/5/18 Tue 1/15/1968 Prepare response to comments and Mitigation Monitoring & 5 days Wed 1/16/19 Tue 1/22/19
69 City review response to comments and MMRP 10 days Wed 1/23/19 Tue 2/5/1970 Revise Response to comments and MMRP 5 days Wed 2/6/19 Tue 2/12/1971 City reviews response to comments and MMRP 10 days Wed 2/13/19 Tue 2/26/1972 Prepare Final MND 5 days Wed 2/27/19 Tue 3/5/1973 City MND and LCP Staff Report to Council 10 days Wed 3/6/19 Tue 3/19/1974 Adopt MND & Approve City CDP (CEQA, City of Del Mar) 5 days Wed 3/20/19 Tue 3/26/19 75 Sign CE (NEPA, Caltrans) 5 days Wed 3/27/19 Tue 4/2/1976 Task 7: Project Report 110 days Wed 9/5/18 Tue 2/5/1977 Draft Project Report (DPR) 60 days Wed 9/5/18 Tue 11/27/1878 Circulate DPR 20 days Wed 11/28/18 Tue 12/25/1879 Final Project Report 30 days Wed 12/26/18 Tue 2/5/1980 Task 8: 30% Design Basis 50 days Wed 2/6/19 Tue 4/16/1981 Prepare Geometric Approval Drawings (GAD) 20 days Wed 2/6/19 Tue 3/5/1982 Review and Approval of GAD 30 days Wed 3/6/19 Tue 4/16/1983 Prepare Type Selection Report (TSR) 20 days Wed 2/6/19 Tue 3/5/1984 Review and Approval of TSR 30 days Wed 3/6/19 Tue 4/16/1985 Work Stage C ‐ PS&E and Permitting 275 days Wed 4/17/19 Tue 5/5/20 86 Regulatory Permits 120 days Wed 4/17/19 Tue 10/1/1987 Intermediate Design and PS&E 125 days Wed 4/17/19 Tue 10/8/1988 Final Design and PS&E 150 days Wed 10/9/19 Tue 5/5/2089 Work Stage D ‐ Construction Bidding and Award 205 days Wed 5/6/20 Tue 2/16/21 90 Construction Authorization Request 10 days Wed 5/6/20 Tue 5/19/20 H1 H2 H1 H2 H1 H2 H1 H2 H1 H2 H1 H2 H1 H2 H1 H2 H1 H2 H1 H2 H1 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
CAMINO DEL MAR BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
2 of 3 Date Revised: 032317
ATTACHMENT B
58 June 16, 2026 Item 6
ID Task Name Duration Start Finish
91 Right‐of‐Way Certification 60 days Wed 5/20/20 Tue 8/11/20 92 Construction Finding Obligation 55 days Wed 8/12/20 Tue 10/27/2093 DLAE 5 days Wed 8/12/20 Tue 8/18/2094 Headquarters 10 days Wed 8/19/20 Tue 9/1/2095 FHWA 40 days Wed 9/2/20 Tue 10/27/2096 Bidding & Award 80 days Wed 10/28/20 Tue 2/16/21
97 Work Stage E ‐ Construction 340 days Wed 2/17/21 Tue 6/7/22 H1 H2 H1 H2 H1 H2 H1 H2 H1 H2 H1 H2 H1 H2 H1 H2 H1 H2 H1 H2 H1 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
CAMINO DEL MAR BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
3 of 3 Date Revised: 032317
ATTACHMENT B
59 June 16, 2026 Item 6
ATTACHMENT B 60 June 16, 2026 Item 6
ATTACHMENT B 61 June 16, 2026 Item 6
ATTACHMENT B 62 June 16, 2026 Item 6
ATTACHMENT B 63 June 16, 2026 Item 6
ATTACHMENT B 64 June 16, 2026 Item 6
ATTACHMENT B 65 June 16, 2026 Item 6
ATTACHMENT B 66 June 16, 2026 Item 6
ATTACHMENT B 67 June 16, 2026 Item 6
ATTACHMENT B 68 June 16, 2026 Item 6
ATTACHMENT B 69 June 16, 2026 Item 6
ATTACHMENT B 70 June 16, 2026 Item 6
ATTACHMENT B 71 June 16, 2026 Item 6
ATTACHMENT B 72 June 16, 2026 Item 6
ATTACHMENT B 73 June 16, 2026 Item 6
ATTACHMENT B 74 June 16, 2026 Item 6
ATTACHMENT B 75 June 16, 2026 Item 6
ATTACHMENT B 76 June 16, 2026 Item 6
ATTACHMENT B 77 June 16, 2026 Item 6
ATTACHMENT B 78 June 16, 2026 Item 6
ATTACHMENT B 79 June 16, 2026 Item 6
ATTACHMENT B 80 June 16, 2026 Item 6
ATTACHMENT B 81 June 16, 2026 Item 6
ATTACHMENT B 82 June 16, 2026 Item 6
ATTACHMENT B 83 June 16, 2026 Item 6
ATTACHMENT B 84 June 16, 2026 Item 6
ATTACHMENT B 85 June 16, 2026 Item 6
ATTACHMENT B 86 June 16, 2026 Item 6
ATTACHMENT B 87 June 16, 2026 Item 6
ATTACHMENT B 88 June 16, 2026 Item 6
ATTACHMENT B 89 June 16, 2026 Item 6
ATTACHMENT B 90 June 16, 2026 Item 6
MT230912.001P/SDI22P141661 Revised March 17, 2023
KLEINFELDER 770 First Avenue, Suite 400, San Diego, CA 92101 p | 619.831.4600 March 17, 2023
Tim Thiele, Engineering Manager
City of Del Mar
1050 Camino Del Mar
Del Mar, California 92014
SUBJECT: CAMINO DEL MAR BRIDGE REPLACEMENT – PROPOSAL FOR WORK STAGE C
PS&E AND PERMITTING
Dear Mr. Thiele:
Kleinfelder appreciates the opportunity to continue supporting the City of Del Mar on the Camino Del Mar Bridge Replacement Project. Per your request, we have developed the attached scope of work, fee proposal, schedule and organization chart for the next Work Stage C which includes final project plans, specifications and estimate along with optional resource agency permitting. We have also updated the proposal based on our calls on July 20, 2022 and September 8, 2022. In summary, we have updated the scope and fee to save approximately $950k in design cost and shortened the schedule by three months.
We have assumed that we will advance portions of Task 10.1 and 11.1 (response to Caltrans review comments) into the current PA/ED phase starting in October 2022 to gain 2 months of schedule savings. We have reduced the final PS&E fee by $50k to reflect this.
For this next phase, Kleinfelder is proposing to have me take over as Project Manager as we transition to the final design phase. My past experience includes developing PS&E for the Willow Street Bridge over the Sweetwater River for the City of Chula Vista and the Mission Boulevard Bridge over the Santa Ana River for the County of Riverside. Both projects were/are funded through the federal Highway Bridge Program. My experience with Caltrans Local Assistance and with managing complex, high-cost bridge projects will be essential in progressing the Camino Del Mar Bridge through the PS&E Stage and into construction.
We look forward to meeting with you to discuss any comments.
Sincerely,
KLEINFELDER
3-17-2023
James Frost, PE Date
Project Manager
Enclosure: Exhibit A - Scope of Work
Exhibit B – Fee Proposal
Exhibit C – Draft Schedule
Exhibit D – Organization Chart
ATTACHMENT B 91 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Work Stage C – PS&E and Permitting
Revised August 3, 2022
www.kleinfelder.com
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF WORK
ATTACHMENT B 92 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge Replacement – Scope of Work
Amendment: Work Stage C – Final Design & Regulatory Permitting Revised 8/3/22 i | P a g e
A P P E N D I X A
CAMINO DEL MAR BRIDGE
BRIDGE #57C0209
APPENDIX A
SCOPE OF WORK
AMENDMENT
WORK STAGE C
FINAL DESIGN &
REGULATORY PERMITTING
SUBMITTED BY:
KLEINFELDER, INC.
DATE:
REVISED 8/3/22
ATTACHMENT B 93 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge Replacement – Scope of Work
Amendment: Work Stage C – Final Design & Regulatory Permitting Revised 8/3/22 ii | P a g e
A P P E N D I X A
APPENDIX A • SCOPE OF WORK
TABLE OF CONTENTS
APPENDIX A • SCOPE OF WORK.........................................................................................................................1 1 ARTICLE I • PROJECT INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................1
1.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................................1
1.2 LOCATION........................................................................................................................................2
1.3 COORDINATION..............................................................................................................................3
1.4 PROJECT OBJECTIVE (WORK STAGES) .....................................................................................3
1.5 STANDARDS ....................................................................................................................................4
1.5.1 Environmental .......................................................................................................................4
1.5.2 Final Survey/Aerial Topographical Mapping........................................................................4
1.5.3 Design....................................................................................................................................4
1.5.4 Plans, Specifications, And Estimate ......................................................................................4
1.6 KEY PERSONNEL............................................................................................................................5
1.7 CITY RESPONSIBILITIES...............................................................................................................5 2 ARTICLE II • WORK TO BE PERFORMED BY CONSULTANT........................................................6
2.1 TASK 1 PROJECT ADMINISTRATION .........................................................................................6
2.1.1 Project Management..............................................................................................................6
2.1.2 Quality and Risk Management ..............................................................................................6
2.1.3 Conduct Project Development Team Meetings.....................................................................7
2.1.4 Budgeting and Cost Accounting............................................................................................7
2.1.5 Scheduling .............................................................................................................................7
2.1.6 Contract Administration ........................................................................................................8
2.1.7 Support for Local Assistance Documents..............................................................................8
2.1.8 Deliverables...........................................................................................................................8
2.2 TASK 2 CIVIL DESIGN....................................................................................................................9
2.2.1 Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) ...................................................................9
2.2.2 Right of Entry Permits.........................................................................................................11
2.2.3 Final Right of Way Requirements Map...............................................................................12
2.2.4 Design Exceptions...............................................................................................................12
2.3 TASK 3 SURVEYING AND RIGHT OF WAY .............................................................................12
2.3.1 Research and Data Gathering ..............................................................................................12
2.3.2 Design Surveys....................................................................................................................13
2.3.3 Pothole Surveys...................................................................................................................13
2.3.4 Plats and Legal Descriptions for TCEs................................................................................13
2.4 TASK 4 UTILITY COORDINATION.............................................................................................13
2.4.1 Utility Verification, Relocation Exhibits, and Coordination ...............................................13
2.4.2 Utility Potholing ..................................................................................................................14
2.4.3 Final Utility Plans and Specifications..................................................................................14
2.5 TASK 5 ON-SITE DRAINAGE DESIGN.......................................................................................15
2.5.1 Update On-Site Drainage Report.........................................................................................15
2.5.2 On-Site Drainage Plans .......................................................................................................16
2.5.3 Coordinate with Bridge Drainage........................................................................................16
2.6 TASK 6 WATER QUALITY DESIGN ...........................................................................................16
2.6.1 Update Water Quality Report ..............................................................................................16
2.6.2 Water Quality Design & Construction Plans.......................................................................16
2.6.3 Bmp Maintenance Plan........................................................................................................17
2.7 TASK 7 EROSION CONTROL/SWPPP DESIGN .........................................................................17 ATTACHMENT B 94 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge Replacement – Scope of Work
Amendment: Work Stage C – Final Design & Regulatory Permitting Revised 8/3/22 iii | P a g e
A P P E N D I X A
2.7.1 Erosion Control Plans, Specifications and Estimate............................................................17
2.7.2 Prepare Draft SWPPP for Contractor Adoption ..................................................................17
2.8 TASK 8 TRAFFIC DESIGN............................................................................................................17
2.8.1 Final Traffic Management Plan (TMP) ...............................................................................17
2.8.2 Signing and Striping Plans ..................................................................................................17
2.8.3 Signing and Striping Special Provisions and Cost Estimate................................................18
2.8.4 Temporary Traffic Control Design......................................................................................19
2.8.5 Temporary Traffic Control Quantities and Specifications ..................................................19
2.9 TASK 9 LANDSCAPE DESIGN.....................................................................................................20
2.9.1 Planting Design....................................................................................................................20
2.9.1.1 Planting Plans, Details, and Notes .....................................................................................20
2.9.1.2 Planting Quantities and Specifications...............................................................................20
2.9.2 Irrigation Design..................................................................................................................20
2.9.2.1 Irrigation Plans, Details, and Notes....................................................................................20
2.9.2.2 Irrigation Quantities and Specifications.............................................................................20
2.9.3 Architectual Design .............................................................................................................21
2.9.3.1 Raised Median Hardscape Layout, Details, and Notes......................................................21
2.9.3.2 Raised Median Hardscape Quantities and Specifications..................................................21
2.9.3.3 Architectural Visual Simulations.......................................................................................21
2.10 TASK 10 ROADWAY DESIGN .....................................................................................................22
2.10.1 Responsd to Caltrans Review Comments on Draft TSR & Perform Additional Analyses .22
2.10.2 Roadway Geometric Approval Plans...................................................................................22
2.10.3 Roadway Plans and Stage Construction ..............................................................................23
2.10.4 Roadway Calculations.........................................................................................................23
2.10.5 Draft Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (65% Complete) ................................................23
2.10.6 Draft Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (90% Complete) ................................................23
2.10.7 Draft Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (100% Complete) ..............................................24
2.10.8 Final Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (Final Complete)................................................24
2.11 TASK 11 BRIDGE AND RETAINING WALL DESIGN...............................................................24
2.11.1 Responsd to Caltrans Review Comments on Draft TSR & Perform Additional Analyses .24
2.11.2 Final Type Selection Report ................................................................................................24
2.11.3 Bridge and Structures Calculations .....................................................................................25
2.11.4 65% Plans, Specifications & Estimates (PS&E) – Unchecked Details...............................25
2.11.5 Draft 90% Plans, Specifications & Estimates (PS&E)........................................................26
2.11.6 100% Plans, Specifications & Estimates (Ps&E)................................................................26
2.11.7 Final Plans, Specifications & Estimates (PS&E) – Issue For Construction ........................26
2.12 TASK 12 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN ...........................................................................................27
2.12.1 Responsd to Caltrans Review Comments on Draft TSR & Perform Additional Analyses .27
2.12.2 Pre-Field Activities..............................................................................................................27
2.12.2.1 Boring Locations................................................................................................................27
2.12.2.2 Permitting...........................................................................................................................27
2.12.2.3 Work Plan ..........................................................................................................................28
2.12.2.4 Utility Markout ..................................................................................................................28
2.12.3 Field Investigation And Laboratory Testing........................................................................28
2.12.4 Final Foundation Report (FR) .............................................................................................30
2.12.5 Final Geotechnical Design Report (GDR)...........................................................................31
2.12.6 Final Materials Report.........................................................................................................32
2.12.7 Specifications, Plans, & Estimates Support.........................................................................33
2.13 TASK 13 RIVER HYDRAULICS REPORT...................................................................................34
2.13.1 Responsd to Caltrans Review Comments on Draft TSR & Perform Additional Analyses .34 ATTACHMENT B 95 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge Replacement – Scope of Work
Amendment: Work Stage C – Final Design & Regulatory Permitting Revised 8/3/22 iv | P a g e
A P P E N D I X A
2.13.2 Final River Hydraulics.........................................................................................................34
2.14 TASK 14 REGULATORY PERMITTING......................................................................................35
2.14.1 Assist Geotechnical Permits................................................................................................35
2.14.2 Assist Coastal Development Permit ....................................................................................35
2.14.3 Section 404 Nationwide Permit 14 (Issued by the Usace)...................................................36
2.14.4 Section 7 Consultation (with the USFWS concurrent with the Section 404 Nationwide Permit from USACE) ..........................................................................................................36
2.14.5 Section 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement (Issued by the CDFW) .............................36
2.14.6 Section 401 Water Quality Certification (Issued by the RWQCB).....................................37
2.14.7 Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Plan (Acceptable to the USACE, USFWS, RWQCB, CDFW, and CCC)................................................................................................................37
2.14.8 Lease or Lease Amendment (Issued by the California State Lands Commission to Allow Temporary Access onto State Lands During Construction) ................................................37
2.14.9 Regulatory Permitting Project Management .......................................................................37 ATTACHMENT B 96 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge Replacement – Scope of Work
Amendment: Work Stage C – Final Design & Regulatory Permitting Revised 8/3/22 1 | P a g e
A P P E N D I X A
APPENDIX A • SCOPE OF WORK
1 ARTICLE I • PROJECT INTRODUCTION
1.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This project proposes to replace the existing Camino Del Mar Bridge (Br. No. 57C-0209) over the San Dieguito River in the City of Del Mar, San Diego County.
The existing Camino Del Mar Bridge (#57C-0209) is an 11-span reinforced concrete T-beam structure that was constructed in 1932 and widened in 1952. In 2000, the traffic barriers were upgraded using metal tubular railings, and the metal and timber pedestrian walkway was replaced.
In 2006 the Sufficiency Rating (SR) was listed as 43.2, and in 2010, it was listed as 61.5 and Structurally Deficient (SD), primarily due to poor condition of the superstructure. Therefore, the bridge is currently on the “Eligible Bridge List.” The existing Camino Del Mar Bridge carries two approximately 12’ lanes of traffic over the San Dieguito River (one lanes in each direction), two 7’- 6” buffered Class II Bike Lanes, as well as several utility crossings.
Work Stage A of this project was performed circa 2012 for preliminary structural assessment of the bridge. The result of Work Stage A was a Rehabilitation Strategy Report that confirmed issues of deterioration due to corrosion, and identified several additional items that require corrective action, including collapse vulnerability during the design seismic event, scour criticality, and a backwater condition during the design flood. It was concluded that replacement is the most cost-effective solution to address rehabilitation needs.
Work Stage B of this project was performed circa 2022 for the Project Approval (PA) / Environmental Documentation Phase of the project. CALTRANS has given Conditional Concurrence for an 86’-6” wide, 624’ long, 5-span variable depth cast-in-place prestressed concrete box girder bridge supported on round or oblong columns and approval to proceed with a NEPA Categorical Exclusion (CE) and CEQA Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration environmental clearance. This work is underway and anticipated to be complete in the fall of 2022.
The following Scope of Work describes Work Stage C Final Design and Regulatory Permitting Phase of this project.
ATTACHMENT B 97 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge Replacement – Scope of Work
Amendment: Work Stage C – Final Design & Regulatory Permitting Revised 8/3/22 2 | P a g e
A P P E N D I X A
1.2 LOCATION
The project site is located around the Camino Del Mar Bridge over the San Dieguito River. Below is a vicinity map of the proposed project.
ATTACHMENT B 98 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge Replacement – Scope of Work
Amendment: Work Stage C – Final Design & Regulatory Permitting Revised 8/3/22 3 | P a g e
A P P E N D I X A
1.3 COORDINATION
ENGINEER shall coordinate with other involved agencies for compatible design and phasing of construction with existing conditions. Coordination may include, but will not necessarily be limited to, the following:
• City of Del Mar (CITY)
• California Department of Transportation (CALTRANS)
• Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)
• Utility Companies
• Regulatory Agencies including:
o U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
o U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)
o National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS)
o National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Fisheries o California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW)
o Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB)
o California Costal Commission (CCC)
We understand that CALTRANS may exercise review and approval function through the CITY PROJECT MANAGER at key points in the development process. All contact with CALTRANS will be directed through the CITY. Milestone PROJECT design reviews will be performed for the specific products and deliverables listed herein. The CITY PROJECT MANAGER will conduct these reviews in addition to the monthly project status reports and meetings. All meetings with other outside agencies will be scheduled by ENGINEER with approval of CITY.
1.4 PROJECT OBJECTIVE (WORK STAGES)
Services performed for this project are anticipated in the following five work stages. Work Stages A and B are completed or nearly complete. The objective of this document is to describe Work Stage C.
• Work Stage A – Rehabilitation/Retrofit Strategy (past agreement) • Work Stage B – Preliminary Engineering & Environmental Documentation (past agreement) • Work Stage C – Regulatory Permitting and Final Design (current proposal) • Work Stage D – Construction Bidding and Award Support (future amendment) • Work Stage E – Design Support during Construction (future amendment) The objective of Work Stage C is to prepare the final design plans and to obtain Resource Agency permits for construction of new bridge.
The following scope of work has been developed based on the current understanding of the required process; however, it should be noted that additional tasks and schedule adjustments may be required ATTACHMENT B 99 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge Replacement – Scope of Work
Amendment: Work Stage C – Final Design & Regulatory Permitting Revised 8/3/22 4 | P a g e
A P P E N D I X A
as Work Stage C develops with CALTRANS acceptance of the Final Bridge Type Selection Report and regulatory permitting requirements.
The current scope of work covers only Work Stage C which will commence upon written notice to proceed. The subsequent phases will not proceed until the scope of work and the pertinent fee for each phase are negotiated and authorized in writing by CITY.
1.5 STANDARDS
The plans/technical report and the environmental document shall be prepared in accordance with current CALTRANS regulations, policies, procedures, manuals, and standards including compliance with FHWA requirements and/or CITY standards as appropriate. The Plans, Specifications, and Estimate prepared and Resource Agency Permits will follow the format for CALTRANS to the extent applicable for a facility off of the state highway system. Improvements of local roads may be prepared in accordance with CITY standards in lieu of CALTRANS standards as directed by the CITY PROJECT MANAGER. ENGINEER will prepare fact sheets for CITY approval, documenting the exceptions to mandatory and advisory design standards. All documents shall be prepared using English Standard Units and dimensions. The Engineering documents are not expected to be reviewed by or be under the purview of CALTRANS. However, considering the amount of federal funds authorized for the project, responding to one cycle of comments from CALTRANS Local Assistance is included with the scope of work during the Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (PS&E) certification process.
1.5.1 Environmental
The procedures to be followed and the content of the environmental surveys, environmental technical reports, and environmental documents are set forth in CALTRANS Project Development Procedures Manual (PDPM), CALTRANS Environmental Handbook, CALTRANS Transportation Laboratory technical manuals for environmental studies, FHWA’s Technical Advisory T6640.8A and CALTRANS Standard Environmental Reference (SER) on the CALTRANS website.
Federal and state requirements for environmental analysis and impact assessment, as set forth in the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and other applicable federal and state regulations, must be satisfied.
1.5.2 Final Survey/Aerial Topographical Mapping
All final surveys and aerial mapping shall be performed by ENGINEER and subconsultants. This will supplement work completed in Work Stages A and B.
1.5.3 Design
Roadway design shall be in accordance with the current CALTRANS Highway Design Manual and its revisions and/or CITY Road Standards as appropriate. Traffic design shall be in accordance with the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) and the California Supplement. The version of design criteria to be used for final bridge design will be documented in the Final Bridge Type Selection Report (TSR). Changes to design criteria after approval of the TSR may result in extra work.
1.5.4 Plans, Specifications, And Estimate
Plans and specifications shall be prepared in conformance with CITY requirements. As part of the work involved in the preparation of the PS&E, the ENGINEER shall prepare and furnish to CITY ATTACHMENT B 100 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge Replacement – Scope of Work
Amendment: Work Stage C – Final Design & Regulatory Permitting Revised 8/3/22 5 | P a g e
A P P E N D I X A
special provisions for items of work included in the plans which are not covered in the Standard Specifications or CALTRANS-approved SSPs.
Bridge plans shall be prepared in accordance with the current editions of the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications with California Amendments, CALTRANS guidelines, and Division of Structures guidance. CITY title blocks shall be used in preparation of bridge plan sheets.
Roadway plans shall be prepared electronically in conformance with the CALTRANS Plan Preparation Manual and the CALTRANS CADD User's Manual of Instructions. Roadway plans shall be prepared with AutoCAD. All roadway plans shall be on single sheet files. Graphic files shall be two-dimensional and shall conform to the CALTRANS data format as defined in CALTRANS CADD User's Manual of Instructions. One set of construction plans on mylar (if requested) and one electronic version shall be provided with the final PS&E submittal.
Special Provisions shall be prepared using Microsoft Word conforming to CALTRANS format and content. ENGINEER shall coordinate with CITY staff regarding procedures for specification and special provision preparation prior to commencing preparation of specifications. CITY PROJECT MANAGER and the staff will provide the boiler plate special provisions to be reviewed and included with technical special provisions by ENGINEER. CITY PROJECT MANAGER will also provide the format to be used for Engineer’s Estimate. This format shall be strictly adhered to.
1.6 KEY PERSONNEL
The ENGINEER has represented to the CITY that certain key personnel will perform the services and if one or more of such personnel should become unavailable, ENGINEER may substitute other personnel of at least equal competence only after prior written approval by the CITY PROJECT MANAGER has been secured. The key personnel for performance of this PROJECT are:
• Project Manager: James Frost, PE
• Senior Roadway Engineer: Don Bloodworth, PE
• Senior Structures Engineer: Nganha Vu, PE
• Environmental Team Leader: Vanessa Toscano/Agency Resource Lead
1.7 CITY RESPONSIBILITIES
The following includes tasks to be completed by the CITY:
• Provide all current standards, existing plans, and manuals • Attend project meetings
• Review existing right-of-way and parcel mapping submitted in CALTRANS format • Coordinate permits for right-of-entry with property owners, if needed • Select preferred alternative
• Provide agency review for design submittals including plans, specifications, and estimate • Provide resource regulatory permitting fees
Colby Cushing, PE
ATTACHMENT B 101 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge Replacement – Scope of Work
Amendment: Work Stage C – Final Design & Regulatory Permitting Revised 8/3/22 6 | P a g e
A P P E N D I X A
2 ARTICLE II • WORK TO BE PERFORMED BY CONSULTANT
2.1 TASK 1 PROJECT ADMINISTRATION
2.1.1 Project Management
This task includes effort associated with Work Stage C for administration, schedules, quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC), document control, and oversight of self-performed and subconsultant work including the day-to-day management of the PROJECT. • The ENGINEER shall document project submittals, key project decisions, and direction in a project chronology matrix.
• Maintain the project specific management plan and update project-related information including project organization chart, contact information for all members of the team, task tracking, and a deliverables list.
• Oversee and manage execution of all deliverables for Work Stage C including work planned to be performed by subconsultants.
• Supervise, coordinate, and monitor work for conformance with City, County, State, and applicable federal standards and policies.
• Prepare, circulate, and file correspondence and memos as appropriate.
The ENGINEER’s Project Management Plan (PMP) will include a Communication Plan. The Communication Plan will consist of a roster of staff involved in the PROJECT and multiple forms of contact for each team member (address, telephone number, e-mail, etc.). The roster of staff will be revised as necessary for the duration of the PROJECT and distributed to the PDT. The Communication Plan will also identify lines of communication with levels of responsibility/authority for development of the PROJECT.
Deliverables:
• Project Management Plan (PMP)
2.1.2 Quality and Risk Management
A project specific QA/QC plan will be developed that will establish protocols and procedures for team members to follow to ensure current project data and policies are used in project development.
The QA/QC plan will remain in force during the performance of the services identified herein. All reports, plans, studies, estimates, and other documents submitted will be complete, accurate, checked, and proofread to meet professional engineering practices and the standard of care in effect at the time of execution of the scope. Each deliverable will identify the person responsible for developing the document and the person responsible for quality control of the document. Consultant will maintain written records of all activities.
Kleinfelder is committed to providing quality work product to our client, whether it is from Kleinfelder personnel or our subcontracting partners. As a part of this commitment, Kleinfelder has partnered with Avetta to collect accurate data from our subcontractors. Avetta provides us with the information we need to better manage our subcontractors with the goal of improving overall safety performance, while meeting our obligations to our clients, using an automated system that allows tracking of safety performance, using metrics like TRIR, DART, EMR, and other measures of ATTACHMENT B 102 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge Replacement – Scope of Work
Amendment: Work Stage C – Final Design & Regulatory Permitting Revised 8/3/22 7 | P a g e
A P P E N D I X A
performance. The cost for this service will be included in our subcontractor invoices as a direct project cost.
Deliverables:
• Quality Control/Quality Assurance Plan (updated for final design) • Project Risk Register (to be maintained through Stage C) • Subcontractor safety performance metrics (annually)
2.1.3 Conduct Project Development Team Meetings
PDT Meetings shall include representatives from the CITY, CALTRANS, and other relevant agencies. A kick-off meeting with the PDT (PDT Meeting No. 1) shall be held as soon as possible after NTP. Project Development Team (PDT) meetings with the CITY PROJECT MANAGER, CALTRANS staff, and other representatives from affected agencies will be held quarterly or as requested by the CITY. Other team leaders and/or subconsultants will attend PDT meetings as appropriate. The ENGINEER shall prepare meeting agenda and minutes for each meeting and have these available for review at least one week prior to each succeeding meeting. PDT meetings shall be held to resolve issues and to apprise the affected agencies of the progress of the PROJECT.
Assumptions:
• Kleinfelder and subconsultant team will attend up to 14 quarterly (every 3 months) PDT status meetings and up to 5 PDT technical meetings to discuss and review submittals. • Approximately 41-month schedule for Work Stage C work. • Community Outreach Meetings are assumed to not be a part of project. ENGINEER can conduct or participate in Community Outreach Meetings as an additional service.
2.1.4 Budgeting and Cost Accounting
The ENGINEER will prepare budgets for each task and milestone for the PROJECT. Such budgets will be entered into the ENGINEER’s Management Information System along with actual costs incurred and used as a basis for cost monitoring and control.
The ENGINEER will prepare monthly invoices and progress reports, in accordance with CITY guidelines, of expenditures for the PROJECT by task and milestone. Expenditures will include direct labor costs, other direct costs, and subconsultant costs. These reports will be included as supporting data for invoices presented to the CITY every month. Reports providing actual physical progress will be required monthly and shall be accompanied by an invoice.
2.1.5 Scheduling
Within one month from the Notice to Proceed (NTP), the ENGINEER will provide a detailed project schedule, which indicates milestones, major activities, and deliverables, to the CITY for review and comments. This schedule will reflect assumed review times necessary by all of the agencies involved. Review of the schedule will occur at subsequent trend meetings. Adjustments will be made, if necessary, due to changing circumstances.
Consultant will prepare a detailed project schedule which indicated milestones, major activities, and deliverables. The schedule will reflect assumed review times necessary by all stakeholder agencies.
ATTACHMENT B 103 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge Replacement – Scope of Work
Amendment: Work Stage C – Final Design & Regulatory Permitting Revised 8/3/22 8 | P a g e
A P P E N D I X A
Schedule and milestone changes related to Work Stage C efforts will be tracked, and schedule will be updated as necessary. Schedule updates will be discussed at the monthly PDT meetings.
2.1.6 Contract Administration
The ENGINEER’s PROJECT MANAGER shall maintain ongoing liaison with the CITY PROJECT MANAGER, AGENCY contacts, and utility companies to promote effective coordination during the course of project development. Progress meetings with ENGINEER’s staff, subconsultants, and the CITY PROJECT MANAGER shall be held regularly.
Assumptions:
• PS&E close-out will be part of this task. Activities associated with the close-out entail verification that contract requirements have been completed, project hard copy and electronic files have been updated and archived, and project can be closed.
2.1.7 Support for Local Assistance Documents
ENGINEER to assist City in preparing documentation for submittal to Caltrans’ Local Assistance and FHWA for HBP Program or other funding purposes.
2.1.8 Deliverables
The primary deliverables listed below shall be submitted to the CITY by ENGINEER. All deliverables will be provided in hard copy format (as identified in the scope for each identified deliverable in this scope of work) unless otherwise noted in this scope of work and in electronic format.
• Project Management Plan
• Quality Control/Quality Assurance Plan
• Project Risk Register
• Subcontractor safety performance metrics (annually)
• Final On-Site Drainage Report
• Final Bridge Hydraulics Report
• Final Bridge Type Selection Report
• Concept Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) • Phase II Site Assessment Report (ESA)
• Draft and Final Materials Report (DMR, FMR)
• Draft and Final Geotechnical Design Report (DGDR, FGDR) • Draft and Final Bridge Foundation Report (DFR, FFR)
• Right-of-Entry / Encroachment Permits (if needed)
• Final architectural details for bridge aesthetics
• 3D Simulation of the bridge construction with Stages and Final conditions ATTACHMENT B 104 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge Replacement – Scope of Work
Amendment: Work Stage C – Final Design & Regulatory Permitting Revised 8/3/22 9 | P a g e
A P P E N D I X A
• 3D Graphics for architectural treatments
• Utility Relocation Letters
• Utility Potholing Summary
• Final Utility Plans
• Draft and Final Technical Specifications
• Draft and Final Engineer’s Cost Estimate
• Final Right-of-Way Requirement Exhibit
• Design Exceptions Fact Sheet (updated for final design) • Final Traffic Management Plan (TMP)
• 65%, 90%, 100%, and Final Bridge, Roadway, Drainage, Erosion Control Landscape PS&E Packages
• NEPA CE and permit applications to USACE, CDFW, and RWQCB, etc. for geotechnical borings
• Permit Applications to USACE, CDFW, and RWQCB, etc. for final construction activities • Consolidated Coastal Development Permit (issued by the CCC) • Section 404 Nationwide Permit 14 (issued by the USACE) • Section 7 Consultation (concurrent with the USFWS and NMFS NOAA Fisheries) • Section 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement (issued by the CDFW) • Section 401 Water Quality Certification (issued by the RWQCB) • National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit (issued by RWQCB) • Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Plan (acceptable to the USACE, USFWS, RWQCB, CDFW, and CCC)
• Encroachment Permit (issued by the California Department of Parks and Recreation to allow temporary access onto state lands during construction)
2.2 TASK 2 CIVIL DESIGN
2.2.1 Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA)
ENGINEER will perform a Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) in accordance with ASTM E1903-19 and CALTRANS requirements to evaluate the potential presence of the following environmental concerns at and adjacent to the Project site that were identified during the Initial Site Assessment (ISA):
• Soils adjacent to paved areas within the Project limits, which might contain aerially deposited lead (ADL) from vehicle exhaust.
• Suspect bridge shims, concrete, bearing pad, and the hinge and joint seal materials at the existing Camino Del Mar Bridge, which might contain asbestos-containing materials (ACM).
ATTACHMENT B 105 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge Replacement – Scope of Work
Amendment: Work Stage C – Final Design & Regulatory Permitting Revised 8/3/22 10 | P a g e
A P P E N D I X A
• Lead-based paint (LBP) that might be present on the existing bridge coatings.
Other concerns identified in the ISA report would need to be addressed during construction (i.e., potential PCBs in soil below the transformers if removed, groundwater sampling for construction dewatering for RWQCB and NPDES requirements, and disposal of treated-wood waste).
The Phase II ESA will consist of reviewing data, preparing work plans (including a site-specific health and safety plan), obtaining site access permits, checking for underground utilities at the site of the proposed field exploration locations through Underground Service Alert (USA), coordinating and performing a field exploration to sample the potentially affected media at the site for hazardous materials, including the ACM and LBP bridge survey, performing environmental laboratory testing on the select samples collected during the field exploration, performing statistical engineering analyses, and preparing a report documenting the findings, conclusions, and recommendations for environmental remediation of the Project site, if warranted. For ADL analysis, a total of up to 36 soil samples collected from 12 locations at three depths (0–0.5 foot, 1.5–2 feet and 3–3.5 feet) below ground surface will be collected along the unpaved shoulders of Camino Del Mar and will be analyzed for total lead using United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Method 6010B. Select soil samples will be analyzed for soluble lead by the California Waste Extraction Test (CA-WET) and modified CA-WET using deionized water as an extractant (DI-WET). Up to 20 ACM and LBP samples will be collected and analyzed for asbestos content by polarized light microscopy (PLM, USEPA Method 600/R-93/116). Additionally, up to 2 bulk samples may be further analyzed for asbestos content by 400-point count methods.
Site access permits will consist only of encroachment permits obtained through the CITY for the portions of the Phase II ESA located outside the San Dieguito River and its existing levees.
Preparation of the Phase II ESA deliverables includes preparation of workplans and reports for both the ADL and ACM/LBP investigation, summarizing the findings of the field assessment. The workplans will include proposed scopes of work for approval by the CITY and CALTRANS. The reports will contain a summary of the laboratory-provided data, analytical summary tables, figures, and recommendations by Kleinfelder regarding the materials sampled. Costs include draft report submittal and responding to one set of comments each from the CITY and CALTRANS. Comments received from the CITY will be addressed prior to submitting the deliverables to CALTRANS for review.
Assumptions:
The following assumptions specific to this task were made in preparing this proposal:
• One electronic draft Phase II ESA report and one draft ACM and LBP Survey report will be submitted to the CITY for comment and then CALTRANS for comments once CITY comments have been addressed. One electronic copy (PDF) of the final reports will be provided by e-mail or Kleinfelder’s secure file transfer protocol (FTP) site. • Attendance at any meetings, additional requirements due to changes or interpretations in regulations by the agencies, or supplemental letters will be provided at additional costs. • Delays in the field, other than delays caused by Kleinfelder, including "right-of-entry" for Kleinfelder, in order to complete services proposed herein will be provided at additional costs. • If refusal is met at a boring location, one additional adjacent location will be attempted.
ATTACHMENT B 106 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge Replacement – Scope of Work
Amendment: Work Stage C – Final Design & Regulatory Permitting Revised 8/3/22 11 | P a g e
A P P E N D I X A
• Unanticipated conditions that may be present that would require additional study, assessment, or remediation will be provided at additional costs.
• Permitting costs for encroachment can be obtained through the CITY will not exceed $3,000.
Additional permits will not be required. If additional permitting is required, additional costs will be incurred. Phase II ESA will be included in the NEPA CE and permit applications for the geotechnical borings (single application).
• Costs assume soil cuttings from the ADL hand auger bores can be placed back in the drill hole and decontamination water can be disposed of within the Project area, away from sensitive receptors. If soil cuttings and wash water are required to be disposed off-site, additional costs will be incurred.
• Field work for the ADL investigation will be completed in two (2) days. • Field work for the ACM/LBP investigation can be completed in one (1) day. • Expedited sample analyses will not be required.
• Department of Environmental Health (DEH) permits will not be required. • Traffic control will be limited to shoulder closures. • Costs for remediation of ADL-impacted materials, remediation workplans, oversight, or preparation of hazardous materials disclosure documents or specifications related to ADL are not included in the scope and fee, but can be provided separately, if requested. • Abatement specifications, oversight, clearance inspections, clearance air sampling following abatement activities, or other services not specifically mentioned in this proposed scope and fee are not included in our scope of work. Kleinfelder can provide additional services under a separate proposed scope and fee, if requested.
Deliverables:
• Draft Phase II ESA ADL Work Plan (2)
• Draft ACM/LBP Work Plan (2)
• Final Phase II ESA ADL Work Plan
• Final ACM/LBP Work Plan
• Draft Phase II ESA ADL Report (2)
• Final Phase II ESA ADL Report
• Draft ACM and LBP Survey Report (2)
• Final ACM and LBP Survey Report
2.2.2 Right of Entry Permits
ENGINEER shall identify locations outside the roadway right-of-way where it will be necessary to obtain specific rights-of-entry from affected property owners. The listing of the candidate locations will be furnished to the CITY. The CITY will contact property owners. ENGINEER will be informed if their support is required to obtain rights-of-entry.
ATTACHMENT B 107 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge Replacement – Scope of Work
Amendment: Work Stage C – Final Design & Regulatory Permitting Revised 8/3/22 12 | P a g e
A P P E N D I X A
Assumptions:
• ENGINEER will identify necessary right-of-entry and specific permits related to their scope of work. These determinations will be derived based on readily available information.
2.2.3 Final Right of Way Requirements Map
Right of way exhibit preparation will follow current CITY procedures. The ENGINEER will coordinate with the CITY regarding the information that will be presented in the exhibit.
The ENGINEER will submit draft and final right of way requirement exhibits to the CITY for review and comment. It is anticipated that CITY will use the approved right of way requirements exhibit to prepare the Legal Descriptions, Plats and Right of Way Maps to acquire the necessary right of way. The CITY will be responsible for completion of land acquisition activities.
Deliverables:
• Draft and Final Right of Way Requirements Exhibit – PDF and 2 Hard Copies Assumptions:
• One round of consolidated comments is anticipated for the Draft and Final submittal. • ENGINEER anticipates CITY will perform the processing for acquisitions.
2.2.4 Design Exceptions
If necessary, design exception documentation described in the PA/ED phase will be prepared during final design. ENGINEER will coordinate with CITY for necessary updates. Design exceptions are described in a fact sheet presenting the exception with reason and necessary justification. Design exceptions will be processed through the CITY with necessary justification and documentation.
Deliverable:
• Design Exceptions Fact Sheets (updated for final design).
2.3 TASK 3 SURVEYING AND RIGHT OF WAY
2.3.1 Research and Data Gathering
CONSULTANT will perform research of recorded maps, perform office survey calculations and prepare a record data drawing file delineating the existing Right-Of-Way lines along the project area, based on recorded subdivision maps and record of survey maps on file with the County of San Diego.
The record data mapping will be tied to existing property monuments located during the survey.
Easements, if any will be plotted based on the recorded subdivision maps only. All found property monuments will be noted on the survey.
The survey will be tied horizontally to City of Del Mar Survey Control Network as shown on Record of Survey No. 12921. The survey will be tied vertically to the benchmark referenced on files provided, as depicted in preliminary drawings prepared by Kleinfelder Engineering Company.
Deliverables:
• Boundary Mapping file provided in AutoCAD C3D 2018
ATTACHMENT B 108 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge Replacement – Scope of Work
Amendment: Work Stage C – Final Design & Regulatory Permitting Revised 8/3/22 13 | P a g e
A P P E N D I X A
2.3.2 Design Surveys
CONSULTANT will perform a supplemental field topographic survey of the project area. The survey will confirm all visible surface improvements including, but not limited to: curbs, catch basins, cross gutters, sidewalks, driveways, curb ramps, walls, fences, gates, signs, and trees with a trunk diameter of 4” or larger. Cross sections will be hand shot at 25’ intervals at each bridge approach between stations 157+00 to 160+00 and 166+50 to 170+00, to include back of sidewalk (or 15’ from back of curb), top of curb, gutter flowline, lip of gutter, crown of road, and median.
Assumptions:
Benchmark will be provided for the existing topographic survey. Supplemental topo and boundary will be based on this Benchmark.
Deliverables:
• Topographic mapping file provided in AutoCAD C3D 2018 • Survey Points file (csv)
2.3.3 Pothole Surveys
CONSULTANT will stake a total of ten (10) pothole locations in the project area. An initial site visit to stake and paint the locations will be conducted. Coordinates of the locations will be provided by the Client as depicted in preliminary drawings prepared by Kleinfelder Engineering Company.
A subsequent site visit to locate refence nails or marks will be conducted after the pothole locations have been completed.
Deliverables:
• Survey Points file (csv) for pothole locations
2.3.4 Plats and Legal Descriptions for TCEs
CONSULTANT will prepare a total of three (3) plats and legal descriptions, for temporary construction easement purposes, as required. CITY will be responsible to provide front end document and record the Temporary Construction Easements. CONSULTANT shall prepare the plat and legal descriptions are required by the designers.
Deliverables:
• Up to three (3) plats and legal descriptions for Temporary Construction Easements (TCEs)
2.4 TASK 4 UTILITY COORDINATION
2.4.1 Utility Verification, Relocation Exhibits, and Coordination This project is proposed to be funded mainly by federal funds and must therefore conform to the processes and procedures of the CALTRANS Office of Local Programs.
ENGINEER shall coordinate with utility owners and CITY utility coordination staff with respect to all utility related matters. ENGINEER shall provide copies of all correspondence with utility companies and other utility related information to the CITY. Correspondence, as described herein, shall be prepared by ENGINEER for either ENGINEER or CITY signature, as appropriate, and as directed by the CITY’s Project Manager.
ATTACHMENT B 109 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge Replacement – Scope of Work
Amendment: Work Stage C – Final Design & Regulatory Permitting Revised 8/3/22 14 | P a g e
A P P E N D I X A
ENGINEER shall coordinate with CITY staff to obtain record copies of utility maps from each utility owner within the project limits for existing and/or proposed utility facilities. ENGINEER shall include mapping and/or exhibits that clearly define the project limits as part of the requests for utility information.
ENGINEER shall Identify utility companies affected by the project and delineate utilities within the project’s sphere of influence on the plans. ENGINEER shall prepare a composite utility plan/relocation exhibit, which shall include all existing utilities (above ground and below ground) and utilities that are identified in utility maps. ENGINEER shall check horizontal and vertical clearances for utilities and coordinate design with the various utility companies to address conflicts.
In addition to information provided by the owning utility companies and through research of other record maps, field surveys shall be used to locate utility features such as manholes, valves, fire hydrants, poles, risers, etc., which shall be reflected on the plans.
Assumptions:
• Bridge lighting and street lighting are assumed to be not a part of the project based on the absence of bridge lighting and street lighting in the existing condition. If bridge lighting or street lighting is required, ENGINEER can assist or perform design as an additional service.
Deliverables:
• Composite Utility Plan & Relocation Exhibit
2.4.2 Utility Potholing
If it is necessary to pothole existing utilities at critical locations, ENGINEER shall coordinate with CITY staff to arrange with the respective utility owner to pothole its facility. ENGINEER will pothole up to ten (10) identified conflict locations. ENGINEER shall coordinate the use of field survey crews to locate potholed utilities by coordinates and elevations based on the project’s survey controls. Pothole locations will be shown on the composite utility plan/relocation exhibit.
Deliverables:
• Up to ten (10) potholes at identified conflict locations • Utility Potholing Summary
2.4.3 Final Utility Plans and Specifications
ENGINEER will prepare final design utility plan sheets showing known utility conflicts with construction notes indicating action to be taken and by whom. Inventory numbers of poles, vaults, and other surface facilities shall be shown on the plans for those facilities that have such numbers attached to the facility and as provided on the owner’s inventory maps.
ENGINEER shall send final design plans through CITY staff to owning utility companies within the project limits with requests for review and comments on the plans relevant to their respective facilities, and with requests for other project specific information.
ENGINEER shall monitor responses of utility notices received and make recommendations for mitigating conflicts. ENGINEER shall provide written responses to utility companies with regard to stated concerns and conduct design coordination meetings with utility companies as needed.
Unresolved issues shall be brought to the attention of the CITY PROJECT MANAGER and CITY ATTACHMENT B 110 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge Replacement – Scope of Work
Amendment: Work Stage C – Final Design & Regulatory Permitting Revised 8/3/22 15 | P a g e
A P P E N D I X A
utility coordination staff as early as practical. ENGINEER, through CITY staff, shall request and obtain a written acknowledgement of any conflicts from the respective utility owners. Reasonable efforts shall be taken to accommodate utility company requests for minor design changes to accommodate their facilities. ENGINEER understands that the utility companies are generally operating within the CITY right-of-way, but may have prior rights to that of the CITY in some cases.
ENGINEER shall coordinate inclusion of special provisions in CITY’s bid documents for adjustments and relocations of utility facilities as alternate bid items, if requested by the owning utility. Said work may require that cooperative agreements be prepared by CITY between the CITY and the owning utility companies. CONSULTANT shall provide information and exhibits as required to support the preparation of cooperative agreements, if needed.
ENGINEER shall participate in utility coordination meetings, as needed, regarding adjustments and relocations, to resolve conflict issues. This scope assumes up to five (5) meetings.
ENGINEER shall make recommendations for special provision language with regard to utility issues, recommendations for construction windows of time for utility relocation activities, recommendations for inclusion of utility bid items, etc.
ENGINEER shall assist with the resolution of utility related issues that may arise during the bidding process and during construction, including design modifications as needed and as approved by the CITY PROJECT MANAGER.
Specific issues and utility company requirements may result in deviation from the procedures outlined herein.
Deliverables:
• Final Composite Utility Plans
• Utility Specifications/Special Provisions
2.5 TASK 5 ON-SITE DRAINAGE DESIGN
2.5.1 Update On-Site Drainage Report
ENGINEER will prepare one Drainage Report for the construction of the proposed Camino del Mar bridge and associated roadway approach improvements. The report will be consistent with the Preliminary Drainage Report previously prepared ENGINEER as part of the Environmental Documentation process. The Drainage Report will include narrative, drainage maps, and calculations for inlet sizing, storm drain sizing and hydraulics, energy dissipation design at discharge points, and street ponding hydraulics. Peak flow detention is not included in this task for reasons detailed in the Preliminary Drainage Report. The study will be prepared to comply with the San Diego County Hydrology and Hydraulic manuals. Storm drain calculations will be based on peak (Q100) flow runoff. The scope includes research of existing As-Built information. This task does not include work associated with preparing or processing of any environmental or LOMR/CLOMR documents (see Task 13.2).
Deliverables:
• Final Drainage Report
ATTACHMENT B 111 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge Replacement – Scope of Work
Amendment: Work Stage C – Final Design & Regulatory Permitting Revised 8/3/22 16 | P a g e
A P P E N D I X A
2.5.2 On-Site Drainage Plans
ENGINEER will prepare construction drawings for the proposed storm drain system consisting of inlets, storm drain piping, cleanouts, headwalls, rip rap energy dissipation, and related appurtenances. The drawings will include complete details of the proposed storm water collection and conveyance system relative to the bridge project including plan and profile sheets, facility details, and required specifications. Plan sheets will be prepared in accordance with CITY requirements and CALTRANS standards. This task does not anticipate the project to require any pumps or force mains related to the storm drain system.
Deliverables:
• Drainage plans, profiles, details
• Specifications for Drainage bid items
• Quantity Estimate for Drainage bid items
2.5.3 Coordinate with Bridge Drainage
ENGINEER will coordinate with Bridge Engineer to route storm water from bridge piping to proposed storm drain system consisting of inlets, storm drain piping, cleanouts, headwalls, and outlets. Construction drawings will be prepared for this connection.
2.6 TASK 6 WATER QUALITY DESIGN
2.6.1 Update Water Quality Report
ENGINEER will prepare one Green Streets Priority Development Project (PDP) Exempt SWQMP for the construction of the proposed Camino del Mar bridge and associated roadway approach improvements. The SWQMP will be consistent with the Preliminary report previously prepared by ENGINEER as part of the Environmental Documentation process and per the current County of San Diego standards. The Green Streets SWQMP will provide analysis, narrative, calculations, and exhibits for the proposed BMPs for the site consisting of BMPs (tree wells), Site Design BMPs, and Source Control BMPs. As a PDP exempt project, this task does not include hydromodification analysis.
Deliverables:
• Final Green Streets PDP Exempt SWQMP
2.6.2 Water Quality Design & Construction Plans
ENGINEER will prepare construction drawings for the proposed water quality treatment BMPs reflected on the PDP Exempt SWQMP. The drawing plans will include complete details of the proposed BMPs including plan and profiles, notes, specifications, and maintenance scheduling table. This task includes coordination with BMP vendors for inclusion into plans sheets. Plan sheets will be prepared in accordance with CITY requirements and CALTRANS standards.
Deliverables:
• Water Quality BMP Plans, Details
• Specifications for Water Quality BMP bid items
• Quantity Estimate for Water Quality BMP bid items
ATTACHMENT B 112 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge Replacement – Scope of Work
Amendment: Work Stage C – Final Design & Regulatory Permitting Revised 8/3/22 17 | P a g e
A P P E N D I X A
2.6.3 Bmp Maintenance Plan
ENGINEER will prepare a BMP maintenance plan detailing the maintenance methods and schedules recommended for upkeep of the BMP facilities. This task is to be prepared during the final stages after concurrence with proposed BMP design.
Deliverables:
• BMP Maintenance Plan
2.7 TASK 7 EROSION CONTROL/SWPPP DESIGN
2.7.1 Erosion Control Plans, Specifications and Estimate ENGINEER will prepare construction drawings showing location and details of construction phase erosion control BMPs per CASQA Fact Sheets. CONSULTANT will prepare Specifications and Quantity Estimate for erosion control BMPs implemented for the project.
Deliverables:
• Erosion Control Plans, Details
• Specifications for Erosion Control bid items
• Quantity Estimate for Erosion Control bid items
2.7.2 Prepare Draft SWPPP for Contractor Adoption
ENGINEER will prepare a Draft SWPPP for the proposed project construction phase to meet the requirements of the State Water Board utilizing the CASQA SWPPP template and Fact Sheet details.
CONSULTANT will coordinate with the Owner and Contractor and assist in uploading the SWPPP and necessary documents to the State SMARTS website for NOI processing. The SWPPP will include the vicinity map, construction-phase BMP exhibits, a Wall map for trailer use, and all forms for daily reporting and compliance during construction. Completion of these forms including filing with the State Board as well as processing the Notice of Termination (NOT) are not included in CONSULTANTS scope. QSP services during construction are not included in CONSULTANT’s scope.
Deliverables:
• Draft SWPPP
2.8 TASK 8 TRAFFIC DESIGN
2.8.1 Final Traffic Management Plan (TMP)
The TMP was completed and approved in the PA/ED phase work. This established the concept for developing final design documents related to traffic handling during construction. No updates to the approved TMP are anticipated. If updates to the TMP are required during the PS&E phase they can be completed with an amended scope.
2.8.2 Signing and Striping Plans
ENGINEER will prepare the signing and striping plans at a scale of 1" = 40'. Plans will be developed in compliance with the CITY design standards and the most current adopted version of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD-CA). The plans will include full geometry ATTACHMENT B 113 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge Replacement – Scope of Work
Amendment: Work Stage C – Final Design & Regulatory Permitting Revised 8/3/22 18 | P a g e
A P P E N D I X A
of Camino Del Mar between the south side of Border Avenue and the north side of Sandy Pointe.
The plans will show existing signing, striping, pavement, curb markings, and required removals.
Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon installation will be included in the signing and striping plan at two (2) pedestrian crossing locations.
Signing and striping plans will be developed for three (3) project stages as follows:
1. Temporary Striping for East Side Bridge Demo and Construction: Temporary signing and striping will be prepared to shift traffic to the west side of the bridge. The existing pedestrian crossing on the south side of the bridge will be relocated to Sandy Lane and the existing RRFBs will be relocated to the temporary crosswalk.
2. Temporary Striping for West Side Bridge Demo and Construction: Temporary striping and striping will be prepared to shift traffic to the east side of the bridge. The temporary crosswalk at Sandy Lane established in the previous stage will remain and no RRFBs are anticipated to be impacted.
3. Final Striping for Post Construction: Final signing and striping will be prepared for the post construction roadway condition. The temporary crosswalk at Sandy Lane and the existing crosswalk north of the bridge will be removed along with all existing RRFB equipment. New RRFB equipment will be installed at the final crosswalk locations north and south of the bridge.
Assumptions:
• A typical sheet will be designed to show advanced signage placement outside the limits of the temporary signing and striping improvements. The intent of this plan will be to show temporary construction signage placement to notify drivers of construction activity in advance work area.
This sheet will be referenced by both temporary signing and striping plans. • It is assumed that the RRFB will be run via solar power and communicate wirelessly therefore no conduit for communication or power will be needed on the design plans. If it is determined that solar power will not work for a specific location, an amendment will be sent to the CITY for design of a hard wire power system.
Deliverables:
• One (1) Detail Sheet, One (1) Typical Construction Signa Placement Sheet, Two (2) Temporary Signing and Striping Sheets, and One (1) Final Signing and Striping Sheet (65%, 90%, 100%, and Final Submittals).
2.8.3 Signing and Striping Special Provisions and Cost Estimate ENGINEER will prepare technical special provisions per CITY requirements for bidding by the CITY. ENGINEER will prepare special provisions following Greenbook format.
ENGINEER will prepare quantity calculations and final construction cost estimates for signing and striping work in accordance with CITY requirements. The cost estimate developed will be consistent with the bid items and descriptions and backup unit cost calculations will be provided. The backup unit cost calculations will be itemized with list prices and quantities for individual improvement elements.
Assumptions:
ATTACHMENT B 114 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge Replacement – Scope of Work
Amendment: Work Stage C – Final Design & Regulatory Permitting Revised 8/3/22 19 | P a g e
A P P E N D I X A
• The CITY’s most current boilerplate special provisions will be provided as a template.
Deliverables:
• Special Provisions, Engineers Estimate of Probable Cost, and Backup Unit Price Calculations (60%, 90%, 100%, and Final Submittals).
2.8.4 Temporary Traffic Control Design
ENGINEER will work with the project team to develop engineered traffic control plans that aim to minimize traffic disruption, provide safe travel through the construction work zone for all modes of travel, and provide safety to construction workers. Plans will be prepared at a scale of 1” = 40’ and will conform to CITY design guidelines and California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD), latest edition.
Traffic control plans will be developed for three (3) project stages as follows:
1. Median Closure on South Side of Bridge: Temporary traffic control will be design for the median removal work being completed on the south side of the bridge.
2. Median Closure on North Side of Bridge: Temporary traffic control will be design for the median removal work being completed on the north side of the bridge.
3. The median removal work being completed on the north side of the bridge.
Assumptions:
• Anticipated traffic control stages are based on bridge construction staging exhibits available at the time of scoping. If it is determined additional traffic control stages are needed, an amendment will be sent to the CITY for the additional design.
• ENGINEER will proceed with the traffic control design once the design related to other disciplines is relatively set. Once traffic control is developed, if design changes are made which fundamentally change the traffic control design additional scope may be needed for revisions.
Deliverables:
• One (1) Detail Sheet, Three (3) Traffic Control Stages (90%, 100%, and Final Submittals)
2.8.5 Temporary Traffic Control Quantities and Specifications ENGINEER will prepare technical special provisions per CITY requirements for bidding by the CITY. STC will prepare special provisions following Greenbook format.
ENGINEER will prepare quantity calculations and final construction cost estimates for traffic control work in accordance with CITY requirements. The cost estimate will be developed utilizing County of San Diego methodology (i.e., a percentage of the overall construction estimate).
Assumptions:
• The CITY’s most current boilerplate special provisions will be provided as a template.
Deliverables:
• Special Provisions, Engineers Estimate of Probable Cost, and Backup Unit Price Calculations (90%, 100%, and Final Submittals)
ATTACHMENT B 115 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge Replacement – Scope of Work
Amendment: Work Stage C – Final Design & Regulatory Permitting Revised 8/3/22 20 | P a g e
A P P E N D I X A
2.9 TASK 9 LANDSCAPE DESIGN
2.9.1 Planting Design
ENGINEER will prepare Irrigation, and Planting Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (PS&E) will be prepared. Submittals will be made for the following phases: 65%, 90%, 100%, & Final PS&E.
2.9.1.1 Planting Plans, Details, and Notes
ENGINEER will conduct a site visit to confirm existing conditions:
• Receive and review existing landscape and irrigation as-built drawings. • Assess existing site conditions.
• Meet with CITY Maintenance Personnel to review existing planting and irrigation conditions. • Prepare a Schematic Landscape Plan.
• Prepare Planting Plans, Details, and Notes.
Deliverables:
• Schematic Landscape Plan
2.9.1.2 Planting Quantities and Specifications
• Prepare Planting Plan Quantities.
• Prepare Planting Specifications.
Deliverables:
• Planting Plan Quantities
• Planting Plan Specifications
2.9.2 Irrigation Design
Submittals will be made for the following phases: 65%, 90%, 100%, & Final PS&E.
2.9.2.1 Irrigation Plans, Details, and Notes
• Prepare Irrigation Plans, Details and Notes.
• CONSULTANT to advise on how to cap existing reclaimed water line used for irrigation.
Deliverables:
• Irrigation Plans, Details, and Notes
2.9.2.2 Irrigation Quantities and Specifications
• Prepare Irrigation Plan Quantities.
• Prepare Irrigation Plan Specifications.
Deliverables:
• Irrigation Plan Quantities
• Irrigation Plan Specification
ATTACHMENT B 116 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge Replacement – Scope of Work
Amendment: Work Stage C – Final Design & Regulatory Permitting Revised 8/3/22 21 | P a g e
A P P E N D I X A
2.9.3 Architectual Design
Submittals will be made for the following phases: 65%, 90%, 100%, & Final PS&E.
2.9.3.1 Raised Median Hardscape Layout, Details, and Notes • Schematic Raised Median Hardscape Concept will be included in the Schematic Landscape Plan.
• Upon selection of an approved Raised Median Hardscape Concept, hardscape layout will be added to Planting Plans, details, and notes will be prepared.
Deliverables:
• Raised Median Hardscape Layout, Details, and Notes will be shown in Planting Plans.
2.9.3.2 Raised Median Hardscape Quantities and Specifications • Raised Median Hardscape Layout Quantities will be prepared. • Raised Median Hardscape Layout Specifications will be prepared.
Deliverables:
• Raised Median Hardscape Layout Quantities
• Raised Median Hardscape Layout Specifications
2.9.3.3 Architectural Visual Simulations
The ENGINEER will provide final architectural details and visual simulations for the bridge architectural features including the entry pilasters, exterior railings, barrier treatments, belvederes, and intermediate pilasters. The final architectural details will be based on the approved conceptual details as processed through CITY. Final details will show all artwork and graphics necessary for the bridge PS&E and will be routed through the project stakeholders for review and approval. The final details will be incorporated into the landscape and hardscape plans, specifications, and estimate for bidding and construction.
Visual simulations will be developed in 3D graphics format to allow views from multiple perspectives and may be used for final design level detailing as well as CITY and CITY staff reviews.
The ENGINEER will also provide 3D simulations for the project staged construction. These simulations will show the bridge construction stages and phases including foundations, superstructure approach roadway for Stage 1, Stage 2, and the final configuration. Simulations will be placed over a 3D photo of the site and may be used as visual aids for agency and community meetings prior to and during construction.
Deliverables:
• Final architectural details for bridge aesthetics
• 3D simulation of the bridge construction with stages and final conditions (up to two static views and one video presentation)
• 3D graphics for architectural treatments (up to 8 key views) ATTACHMENT B 117 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge Replacement – Scope of Work
Amendment: Work Stage C – Final Design & Regulatory Permitting Revised 8/3/22 22 | P a g e
A P P E N D I X A
2.10 TASK 10 ROADWAY DESIGN
2.10.1 Responsd to Caltrans Review Comments on Draft TSR & Perform Additional Analyses Itemize and respond to review comments from CALTRANS SLA on the Draft Type Selection Report (TSR). This effort may take multiple iterations with revisions and resubmittals of the Final TSR to SLA before getting concurrence to proceed to Final Design.
2.10.2 Roadway Geometric Approval Plans
The title sheet for specifications and reports, and each sheet of plans, shall bear the professional seal, certificate number, registration classification, expiration date of the certificate and signature of the Professional Engineer responsible for their preparation. All roadway plans shall also use single sheet files.
The following is a summary listing of drawing types that shall be prepared as part of the roadway PS&E package.
Deliverables:
• Title Sheet
• Typical Cross Section Plan
• Key Map and Line Index
• Layout Plan
• Profile and Superelevation Diagrams
• Temporary and Permanent modifications
• Construction Detail for Maintenance Driveways Plan
• Construction Details Plan
Roadway, drainage, traffic, and miscellaneous plans shall be submitted for review to the CITY at the 65%, 90%, and 100% complete stage. A pre-65% submittal will be prepared and submitted that consists of “skeletal” layouts at approximately 30% completion to confirm appropriate direction of the designs and plan set. The ENGINEER will submit all plans electronically. Roadway cross sections, grid grades, and slope staking notes will be submitted only at the 100% complete submittal stage.
Landscape and hardscape plans shall be consistent with the approved conceptual architectural plans developed during the Work Stage B scope of work. Hardscape plans will include details for entry pilasters, intermediate pilasters, decorative barrier and railing treatments, decorative multi-purpose trail surface treatments, interpretive signage, textures, and colors.
Assumptions:
• Final Right-of-Way Requirements will be provided by others. • Communication Plans are not anticipated to be needed and are not included.
Specifications and Special Provisions will be prepared for items not covered by the CALTRANS Standard Specifications or Standard Special Provisions.
ATTACHMENT B 118 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge Replacement – Scope of Work
Amendment: Work Stage C – Final Design & Regulatory Permitting Revised 8/3/22 23 | P a g e
A P P E N D I X A
The Roadway Construction Cost Estimate will be prepared using the latest available CALTRANS cost data and actual recent construction costs in the PROJECT area.
The PS&E will be subject to quality control reviews before submittal. These reviews will assure conformance to CALTRANS and CITY standards and criteria as well as minimize typographical omissions.
2.10.3 Roadway Plans and Stage Construction
ENGINEER shall prepare Roadway Plans with temporary Stage Construction Plans integrated into the overall project Staging Concepts and submit to the CITY for review.
Deliverables:
• Roadway Plans focused on temporary Stage Construction topics.
2.10.4 Roadway Calculations
The following calculations will be provided:
• Working Roadway Cross Sections at 25-foot interval Slope Staking Notes • Grid Grades
• Profile
• Earthwork Quantities
• Other Quantities
Assumptions:
• Kleinfelder will provide calculations for project tasks related to their scope of work. • Limits of permanent work from northerly Camino Del Mar (approximate STA 172+00) to southerly Camino Del Mar at Sandy Lane (approximate STA 156+50).
2.10.5 Draft Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (65% Complete) ENGINEER shall prepare Plans, Specifications, and Cost Estimate and submit to the CITY for review.
Deliverables:
• Roadway Plans
• Design Calculations
• Special Provisions
• Roadway Quantities and Cost Estimate
2.10.6 Draft Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (90% Complete) The roadway plans, revised to incorporate Quality Control review comments, will be submitted to the CITY for review and comments. These will include:
• Roadway Plans
• Design Calculations
ATTACHMENT B 119 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge Replacement – Scope of Work
Amendment: Work Stage C – Final Design & Regulatory Permitting Revised 8/3/22 24 | P a g e
A P P E N D I X A
• Special Provisions
• Roadway Quantities and Cost Estimate
One safety/constructability review meeting will be held at the 90% PS&E stage.
2.10.7 Draft Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (100% Complete) The final PS&E will incorporate applicable comments from the draft PS&E received from the CITY, and other affected agencies. The ENGINEER will provide the necessary final PS&E documents in a bid-ready form. PROJECT files and the Project Engineer’s/Resident Engineer’s file will also be submitted with the final PS&E. The entire PROJECT, which will be prepared in MicroStation format, will be submitted upon final approval of the PS&E.
2.10.8 Final Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (Final Complete) ENGINEER will prepare IFC Plans, Specifications, and Estimate with updates from the Final PS&E Review.
2.11 TASK 11 BRIDGE AND RETAINING WALL DESIGN
2.11.1 Responsd to Caltrans Review Comments on Draft TSR & Perform Additional Analyses Itemize and respond to review comments from CALTRANS SLA on the Draft Type Selection Report (TSR). This effort will require additional technical studies related to geotechnical, structural and hydraulics. It will also take multiple iterations with revisions, technical meetings, and resubmittals of the Final TSR to SLA before getting concurrence to proceed to Final Design.
2.11.2 Final Type Selection Report
Study alternatives for bridge geometrics (length, width, height, skew, etc.), bridge types, roadway profile and alignments, abutment types, scour countermeasures, approach slabs, retaining walls types and geometrics at bridge approaches, bridge pier type, foundation type, abutment foundation type, determine seismic requirements, tsunami requirements, flood requirements, any other requirements and constraints on the bridge design:
• Recommend Preferred Bridge Alternative with all information listed above determined/defined. • Obtain approval from the CITY and concurrence from CALTRANS HBP managers for Preferred Bridge Alternative.
• Following the Type Selection Meeting and approval of the General Plan, structural design calculations will be prepared in conformance with CALTRANS design specifications and procedures.
• All plans and calculations shall conform to the current CALTRANS bridge design criteria and shall be submitted for review and approval.
The scope of this work shall include but not be limited to:
• Bridge plans and construction details shall be prepared on DOS format plan sheets. Standard Details shall be incorporated into the Contract Plans where applicable.
ATTACHMENT B 120 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge Replacement – Scope of Work
Amendment: Work Stage C – Final Design & Regulatory Permitting Revised 8/3/22 25 | P a g e
A P P E N D I X A
• Each plan sheet shall be signed and stamped by the responsible design engineer who is registered in the State of California. Each design shall be independently checked by a Professional Engineer registered in the State of California.
• Environmental Constraints Areas shall be shown in plans (if required in Environmental Document).
2.11.3 Bridge and Structures Calculations
The bridge and structures design will follow current AASHTO and CALTRANS standards. The ENGINEER will develop bridge and structures design calculations to support the 65% plans.
The bridge plans will include drainage details to direct all flows off the bridge and into the roadway drainage system. Bridge run-off calculations will be coordinated with the roadway drainage design.
An Independent Check review of the bridge design shall be conducted as soon as the 65% design is complete. Checking shall include the preparation of an independent set of structural design check calculations and review of the plans and details. The checker and the designer will resolve any substantial differences and concur on any revisions to the contract plans.
Special Provisions will be prepared for items not covered by the CALTRANS Standard Specifications or Standard Special Provisions (SSPs).
The ENGINEER shall edit Standard Special Provisions (SSPs) and prepare Structure Special Provisions specific to this project which will be incorporated into the final PS&E. These Structure Special Provisions shall be prepared, signed and stamped by a Professional Engineer registered in the State of California.
The ENGINEER shall prepare quantity calculations for bid items and prepare the bridge cost estimate. All contract items used shall be substantiated by calculations. Quantity calculations shall be neat and orderly and shall show all sketches, diagrams, and dimensions necessary to allow them to be independently used by field inspectors. All quantity calculations shall be independently checked and substantiated with calculations.
The Construction Cost Estimate will be prepared using the latest available CALTRANS cost data, CITY cost data, and actual recent construction costs in the PROJECT area.
2.11.4 65% Plans, Specifications & Estimates (PS&E) – Unchecked Details ENGINEER shall prepare the 65% structure PS&E and submit to the CITY for review. • Perform calculations for the design of the Preferred Bridge Alternative as outlined in the Type Selection Report.
• Develop 65% Plans – Unchecked Details.
• Prepare preliminary list of special provisions to CALTRANS Standard Specifications. • 65% Plans, estimates, and special provisions summary/list is submitted to the CITY for review; design calculation are NOT submitted with this submittal.
Deliverables:
• Preliminary list of special provisions
ATTACHMENT B 121 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge Replacement – Scope of Work
Amendment: Work Stage C – Final Design & Regulatory Permitting Revised 8/3/22 26 | P a g e
A P P E N D I X A
• 65% Plans – Unchecked Details
2.11.5 Draft 90% Plans, Specifications & Estimates (PS&E) The 90% structure PS&E shall be compiled and submitted for review to the CITY. Plans, design calculations and design check calculations, quantity calculations, Marginal Estimates and edited Structure Special Provisions will be provided in electronic PDF format. CITY review will be facilitated with a Bluebeam review session to capture all comments and ENGINEER’s response.
Deliverables:
• Draft special provisions
• 90% Plans – Checked Details
• Bridge and Structure Design Calculations
• Bridge Independent Check Calculations
• Bridge and structure Quantities and Estimate
2.11.6 100% Plans, Specifications & Estimates (Ps&E)
The 100% structure PS&E will incorporate review comments from the CITY and other affected agencies. The ENGINEER will provide all necessary documents in a bid-ready form. It is assumed that the CITY will advertise, award, and administer the construction contract for this PROJECT. • Address comments from the CITY on the 90% Submittal (these are final edits) – Revise Plans, Calculations, Special Provisions, Cost Estimates, Bid Items List accordingly. • Complete any internal revisions.
• Update Bid Items List.
• Submit 100% PS&E to the CITY and CALTRANS for a final review and obtain approval to issue for construction.
Deliverables:
• Final design plans in PDF format
• Final Structure Special Provisions in PDF format
• Final quantity calculations and estimate in PDF format • Final design calculations in PDF format (if changed from 90%) • Final design check calculations in PDF format (if changed from 90%) • 4-Scale plans of the bridge deck contours in PDF and plotted format • Resident Engineer’s File (structures information) in PDF format
2.11.7 Final Plans, Specifications & Estimates (PS&E) – Issue For Construction • Address any final minor comments.
• Finalize and publish documents for construction or finalize for files. All Plans, Specs, and Calculations are stamped and signed by PE..
ATTACHMENT B 122 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge Replacement – Scope of Work
Amendment: Work Stage C – Final Design & Regulatory Permitting Revised 8/3/22 27 | P a g e
A P P E N D I X A
• Finalize Bid Items List.
2.12 TASK 12 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN
The ENGINEER will provide geotechnical investigation and final design and construction recommendations for the bridge, roadway embankments, and general earthwork.
Geotechnical scope of work (SOW) for Work Stage C for the Camino Del Mar Bridge Replacement project includes performing geotechnical analyses for support of the Final Bridge Type Selection Report, pre-investigation activities; performing a field investigation and laboratory testing; preparation of a Final Foundation Report (FR), Final Geotechnical Design Report (GDR), and Final Materials Report; and support services for development of specifications, plans, and estimates. A summary description for each of these tasks is provided in the subsequent sections.
2.12.1 Responsd to Caltrans Review Comments on Draft TSR & Perform Additional Analyses Based on comments provided by Caltrans on the PAED-phase Bridge TSR, ENGINEER will perform additional geotechnical analyses consisting of lateral spreading, a pile drivability study, pile capacity analyses, and slope stability analyses to assist in finalizing the Bridge TSR for Caltrans approval. Furthermore, ENGINEER will provide support addressing geotechnical-related comments provided by Caltrans on the Bridge TSR, if needed. The results of the analyses, conclusions, and recommendations for support of the Bridge TSR finalization and approval will be documented in an addendum to the June 19, 2020 Preliminary Foundation Report (PFR).
2.12.2 Pre-Field Activities
2.12.2.1 Boring Locations
Kleinfelder will perform a review of available information to identify and locate explorations for our field investigation based on the proposed elements of the project and the available geotechnical information. The available information review will also aid in preparation of the field investigation services.
2.12.2.2 Permitting
Based on the proposed improvements and anticipated investigation locations for the project, an encroachment permit will be required to work in the CITY right-of-way (ROW). The encroachment permit, which will include traffic control plans, will be prepared and obtained by Kleinfelder. As the proposed improvements are within the CITY ROW, it is assumed that permitting through CALTRANS is not required for the field investigation. Furthermore, since our explorations will exceed 20 feet in depth and will encounter groundwater, a County of San Diego (COUNTY) Department of Environmental Health (DEH) permit will be required. Kleinfelder will prepare and obtain the DEH permit for our field investigation, which includes closing out the permit with a memorandum of the field investigation results to the COUNTY.
Based on our experience during the Project Approval and Environmental Document (PAED) phase of the project, and explorations will be performed over the San Dieguito River in close proximity to the coastline, several environmental permits/approvals are anticipated to be required for the field investigation. This geotechnical scope of work (SOW) assumes that environmentally related permits will be obtained as part of the regulatory permitting in Task 14. Environmental permits that may be required for the field investigation include California Coastal Commission approvals, United States Coast Guard (USCG) permits, CEQA permits, USACE 404 or other permits, NEPA permits, Clean ATTACHMENT B 123 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge Replacement – Scope of Work
Amendment: Work Stage C – Final Design & Regulatory Permitting Revised 8/3/22 28 | P a g e
A P P E N D I X A
Water Act (CWA) permits, CDFW approvals, RWQCB permits, and any other environmentally related permits or approvals. See Section 15 for environmental scope required for the NEPA CE and permitting associated with the geotechnical SOW.
2.12.2.3 Work Plan
We understand that a Work Plan will be required as part of the environmental permitting.
Kleinfelder will prepare a Work Plan outlining our proposed field explorations, equipment to be used, schedule, health and safety plan, and contact personnel to assist the environmental consultant in obtaining these permits. We also understand that this Work Plan will be submitted to Caltrans and the City of Del Mar for their approvals of the proposed exploration locations. Kleinfelder will work with the City and Caltrans for approval of the proposed field investigation.
2.12.2.4 Utility Markout
After necessary permits and approvals have been obtained for the field investigation, Kleinfelder will perform an initial site visit to mark out field investigation locations for utility and rebar clearances. Underground Service Alert (USA) will be notified of the proposed investigations for utility mark out and as required by law. Furthermore, a private geophysical locating company will be subcontracted by Kleinfelder to screen the proposed exploration locations for the presence of subsurface utilities and potential rebar obstructions on the existing bridge deck. Prior to the field exploration or utility clearance, Kleinfelder will coordinate all field exploration activities with our subcontractors and with the City of Del Mar.
2.12.3 Field Investigation And Laboratory Testing
Field Exploration
The proposed geotechnical field exploration is based on the Draft TSR Alternative 1.1 which has been selected for the proposed bridge type and that proposed deep foundations consisting of CastIn-Drilled Hole (CIDH) piles will utilized. CIDH piles are anticipated to extend approximately 160 to 170 feet below ground surface at the piers and approximately 140 feet below ground surface at the abutments. As part of the PS&E phase, explorations will be performed at each proposed bridge pier and abutment as required by CALTRANS. ENGINEER will perform an exploratory boring at two of the four proposed piers supplemented by a Cone Penetrometer Test (CPT) at the remaining two piers for a total of two pier borings and two pier CPTs. Based on the depths of the anticipated foundations, we propose to perform the pier borings and CPTs to depths of 200 ft below ground surface and will perform the pier borings and CPTs from the top of the existing Camino Del Mar bridge deck to minimize impact to the sensitive environmental areas within the project limits. It should be noted that, while the CPTs do not provide soil samples, they allow for continuous data collection along the CPT sounding and are able to be completed relatively quickly compared to exploratory borings. The use of CPTs will allow for collection of data at depths where samples are not taken in nearby borings as well as reduce the duration and associated costs of the field exploration.
Borings and CPTs have previously been performed in the vicinity of the proposed abutments by Kleinfelder during the PAED phase, and by Ninyo & Moore prior to the PAED phase. Therefore, it is assumed that no additional explorations are required at the abutments. However, based on a review of available geotechnical information and experience on the project, depth to formational materials deepens towards the south end of the bridge and that shear wave velocities for seismic hazard ATTACHMENT B 124 June 16, 2026 Item 6
ATTACHMENT B 125 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge Replacement – Scope of Work
Amendment: Work Stage C – Final Design & Regulatory Permitting Revised 8/3/22 29 | P a g e
A P P E N D I X A
analyses were previously measured within the CPT performed at the southern abutment during Kleinfelder’s PAED-phase geotechnical investigation. Therefore, ENGINEER proposes to perform an additional seismic CPT at the northern abutment to characterize the site footprint with respect to seismic hazard response.
Furthermore, new fill embankments and pavements will be constructed for the bridge approaches to an extent of approximately 300 feet to the north and south of the proposed abutments and that portions of these approach embankments will be supported by proposed retaining walls. Based on the PAED-phase TSR, the approach retaining walls are proposed to be supported on shallow foundations. Therefore, ENGINEER proposes to perform two shallow borings, drilled to depths of less than 20 feet, at the bridge approaches further away from the proposed abutments to aid in analysis and recommendations for the pavements, approach embankments, and retaining wall design. One shallow boring is proposed to be performed at the northern approach and one shallow boring is proposed at the southern approach. Additionally, ENGINEER will perform geologic mapping of the existing approach embankment slopes to further aid in stability analyses of the approach embankments. Should the retaining walls require deep foundations or ground improvement for foundation support requiring deeper exploratory borings, this will be an additional cost.
In order to facilitate the proposed field explorations, traffic control and pavement coring will be required to access each exploration location. Kleinfelder will coordinate the traffic control and pavement coring with our subcontractors. Based on our experience during the PAED phase, it is assumed that the explorations may be performed within the shoulder/bike path along Camino Del Mar and that flaggers will not be required to maintain traffic control during the field investigation.
If flaggers are required by the City as part of the encroachment permit requirements, this will be an additional cost.
Based on the anticipated site and subsurface conditions, the borings will be performed by our drilling subcontractor using a truck-mounted drill rig. The drill rig will be capable of using mud rotary drilling techniques for drilling of the pier borings due to the anticipated subsurface and groundwater conditions. The shallow borings proposed for the approach embankments may be drilled using either hollow stem auger (HSA) techniques or mud rotary techniques.
The CPTs will be performed by our CPT subcontractor using a CPT truck rig pushing a small diameter rod with a cone tip into the subsurface. The CPTs performed on the bridge deck will require a steel casing be used at the surface of the bridge deck and socketed into the upper subsurface materials below the mudline in order to stabilize the CPT rods. Furthermore, based on our previous CPT performed on the bridge deck during the PAED phase, shallow obstructions from cobbles or gravels within the San Dieguito River bed may cause early CPT refusal. Our drilling subcontractor will support the CPT explorations by installing and removing steel casings as needed and by performing pre-drilling of the shallow alluvial materials should early CPT refusal be encountered.
Upon completion of the drilling, the deep pier borings will be backfilled using bentonite grout as required by the County DEH permit and soil cuttings/drilling fluid, otherwise known as investigation derived waste (IDW), will be drummed in 55-gallon steel drums. CPTs do not generate IDW; therefore, no drums will be needed for those explorations. The IDW will be sampled by Kleinfelder and sent to our subcontractor for laboratory analytical testing for waste characterization.
Drum storage location will need to be provided by the City; however, it is assumed that the drums will be able to be stored off-site at the nearby City-owned yard as was done during the PAED field ATTACHMENT B 126 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge Replacement – Scope of Work
Amendment: Work Stage C – Final Design & Regulatory Permitting Revised 8/3/22 30 | P a g e
A P P E N D I X A
investigation while waiting for the results of the analytical testing. Upon receipt of analytical test results, drums will be picked up and disposed of by our drum disposal subcontractor assuming the results characterize the IDW as non-hazardous. Although not anticipated, should the analytical testing of the IDW result is characterization of hazardous materials, Kleinfelder will not be responsible for disposal of the hazardous waste drums.
As the pier borings and CPTs will be performed on top of the existing bridge deck, the bridge deck will be patched using rapid-set concrete by our pavement coring subcontractor. The shallow bridge approach borings may be backfilled with soil cuttings as these are proposed to be less than 20 feet in depth. These approach borings, as well as the seismic CPT proposed at the northern abutment, will be patched using either cold-patch asphalt or rapid-set concrete at the surface. If hot mix asphalt patching is required by the City, this will be an additional cost.
The entire geotechnical field investigation, including utility/rebar locating, traffic control, pavement coring and patching, borings, CPTs, and drum disposal, will be performed under the direct supervision of a Kleinfelder field engineer or geologist. Borings will be logged and samples from the borings will be transported to our laboratory for further analysis. The geologic mapping of the embankment slopes will be performed by a certified engineering geologist from Kleinfelder.
Laboratory Testing
Geotechnical laboratory testing will be performed on select samples obtained from the borings in general accordance with American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) and Caltrans test methods. Based on the proposed improvements and anticipated soil conditions, it is anticipated that laboratory testing will consist of direct shear, modified proctor, moisture content & dry density, R-value, corrosion suite (pH, minimum resistivity, soluble sulfates, soluble chlorides), Atterberg limits, sieve and hydrometer analyses, unconfined compression (UC), unconsolidated undrained triaxial (TXUU) tests. The number and type of tests may change based on the conditions encountered in the field.
2.12.4 Final Foundation Report (FR)
Geotechnical engineering analyses will be performed based on the proposed bridge alternative and encountered subsurface conditions. Material properties for subsurface layers will be developed based on the results of our field investigation and laboratory testing and used for the various geotechnical analyses. Geotechnical engineering analyses may consist of various seismic hazard analyses including a final site response analysis, liquefaction analyses, and lateral spreading analyses; axial and lateral capacity for deep foundation design; lateral earth pressures; settlement analyses; and global stability. A Final Foundation Report will be prepared in general accordance with CALTRANS and American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) standards and will provide methodologies and results of our engineering analyses and final geotechnical recommendations, discussions, and conclusions. Per CALTRANS standards, the Final FR is prepared for the proposed bridge and any improvements within a 150-ft-long zone outside of the bridge limits. The contents of the Final FR will be dependent on the proposed conditions and encountered subsurface materials at the site and are anticipated to include the following:
• A brief description of the existing site conditions and proposed project; ATTACHMENT B 127 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge Replacement – Scope of Work
Amendment: Work Stage C – Final Design & Regulatory Permitting Revised 8/3/22 31 | P a g e
A P P E N D I X A
• A summary of our field investigation and laboratory testing procedures and summary of available geotechnical information;
• A description of the observed subsurface soil and groundwater conditions at the exploration locations;
• A discussion of the geologic and tectonic settings;
• Analyses and discussion of scour potential, corrosion potential, and presence of compressible or expansive soils.
• Analyses and discussion of potential geologic and seismic hazards including landslides, tsunamis, surface fault rupture, liquefaction, lateral spreading at proposed piers and abutments, and seismic ground motions and seismic slope stability; • Discussion of the methodologies and results of the final site-specific site response analysis; • Material properties developed for geotechnical engineering analyses; • Axial capacities for various limit states for CIDH foundations for the bridge structure. Material properties for lateral pile capacity analyses will also be provided for use by the bridge engineer and pile design tables will be provided;
• Lateral earth pressures for abutment walls and approach retaining walls; • Shallow foundation analysis and recommendations for approach retaining walls; • Global stability of approach retaining walls;
• Embankment fill settlement analyses;
• Earthwork and temporary excavation and shoring recommendations for the proposed construction;
• Notes for specifications and construction per CALTRANS standards; • Relevant figures including a site vicinity map, exploration location plan, regional geologic map, regional fault and seismicity map, geologic cross sections, and Log of Test Borings (LOTBs); and
• Relevant appendices including logs of the boreholes, CPT results, laboratory test results, previous relevant geotechnical information, and geotechnical engineering calculations.
A draft version of the Final Foundation Report will be submitted for review by the CITY. After receipt of review comments, ENGINEER will finalize the Final Foundation Report and provide an electronic copy. We have assumed one combined round of reviews by the CITY and CALTRANS and one round of comments responses by ENGINEER.
2.12.5 Final Geotechnical Design Report (GDR)
As we understand the proposed improvements will be constructed within approximately 300 feet of the proposed bridge limits, including proposed fills for approach embankments, ENGINEER will prepare a Final GDR for the project in general accordance with CALTRANS and AASHTO standards. The Final GDR is anticipated to include the following:
ATTACHMENT B 128 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge Replacement – Scope of Work
Amendment: Work Stage C – Final Design & Regulatory Permitting Revised 8/3/22 32 | P a g e
A P P E N D I X A
• A brief description of the existing site conditions and proposed project; • A summary of our field investigation and laboratory testing procedures and summary of available geotechnical information;
• A description of the observed subsurface soil and groundwater conditions at the exploration locations;
• A discussion of the geologic and tectonic settings;
• Analyses and discussion of potential geologic hazards including corrosion potential, compressible or expansive soils, landsliding, etc.
• Analyses and discussion of potential seismic hazards including seismic ground motions, surface fault rupture, liquefaction, seismic slope stability, and tsunamis; • Material properties developed for geotechnical engineering analyses; • Embankment fill settlement analyses and slope stability; • Foundation recommendations for signs and light posts (if needed); • Earthwork recommendations;
• Notes for specifications per CALTRANS standards;
• Relevant figures including a site vicinity map, exploration location plan, regional geologic map, regional fault and seismicity map, geologic cross sections, and Log of Test Borings (LOTBs); and
• Relevant appendices including logs of the boreholes, CPT results, laboratory test results, previous relevant geotechnical information, and geotechnical engineering calculations.
A draft version of the Final GDR will be submitted for review by the CITY and CALTRANS. After receipt of review comments, ENGINEER will finalize the Final GDR and provide an electronic copy. We have assumed one combined round of reviews by the CITY and CALTRANS and one round of comments responses by ENGINEER.
2.12.6 Final Materials Report
We understand that new pavements are proposed as part of the Camino Del Mar bridge replacement.
Per CALTRANS standards, new pavement section design should be included in a Final Materials Report. Therefore, ENGINEER will provide the results of the laboratory R-value testing, perform pavement analyses, and provide a recommended pavement sections for the proposed construction as part of the geotechnical SOW. We have assumed that the CITY will work with the project civil engineer to provide appropriate traffic index (TI) values to be used for pavement design. The pavement design will be performed per the CALTRANS Highway Design Manual.
A draft version of the Final Material Report will be submitted for review by the CITY and CALTRANS. After receipt of review comments, ENGINEER will finalize the Final Materials Report and provide an electronic copy. We have assumed one combined round of reviews by the CITY and CALTRANS and one round of comments responses by ENGINEER.
ATTACHMENT B 129 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge Replacement – Scope of Work
Amendment: Work Stage C – Final Design & Regulatory Permitting Revised 8/3/22 33 | P a g e
A P P E N D I X A
2.12.7 Specifications, Plans, & Estimates Support
ENGINEER will provide support for the preparation of specifications related to the geotechnical aspects of the project. Furthermore, ENGINEER will provide support services for review of design plans and construction estimates to verify that the geotechnical recommendations prepared for the project have been properly implemented.
Geotechnical Assumptions and Exclusions:
• ENGINEER will prepare Log of Test Borings (LOTB) plan sheets including as-built LOTB sheets for existing bridge.
• Flaggers for traffic control will not be required by the CITY encroachment permit. • CITY encroachment permit will be obtained; however, permit fees will be waived. • No delays to the field investigation are incurred due to site access or weather. • Hot-mix asphalt patching of surficial pavements for the explorations will not be required as part of the CITY encroachment permit and that patching may be done using either cold-patch or rapid-set concrete.
• Environmental documentation and permitting for the geotechnical field investigation will be provided according to Regulatory Permitting in Task 14. Environmental permits include, but are not limited to, California Coastal Commission approvals, United States Coast Guard (USCG) permits, CEQA permits, USACE 404 or other permits, NEPA permits, Clean Water Act (CWA) permits, CDFW approvals, RWQCB permits, and any other environmentally related permits or approvals.
• Only two non-resource agency permits will be required to be obtained by ENGINEER as part of the geotechnical SOW for the proposed field investigation. These two permits are the COUNTY DEH permit and the CITY encroachment permit which includes traffic control approvals.
• The investigation will be done without any delays due to environmental concerns and that Level D PPE may be used for the field investigation. In the event that the investigation is impacted by any environmental concerns, the resulting additional time and expense will be addressed in a change of condition request.
• The field investigation is subject to prevailing wage requirements and rates. • Field work will be conducted using mud rotary and hollow stem auger techniques during normal business hours between 7 AM and 5 PM on weekdays. Additional charges will apply if night work and/or weekend work is required.
• Additional explorations beyond the scope of work described herein are not required. If additional explorations are required by Caltrans or the City, we can provide the additional scope and fee, if requested.
• Environmental sampling and sample handling, hazardous materials characterization, and/or environmental site assessments are not included in our scope. Drum disposal is only included if investigation derived waste from the boreholes is characterized as non-hazardous.
ATTACHMENT B 130 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge Replacement – Scope of Work
Amendment: Work Stage C – Final Design & Regulatory Permitting Revised 8/3/22 34 | P a g e
A P P E N D I X A
• Infiltration testing is excluded from this scope of work. If needed, infiltration testing may be performed at an additional cost.
• Surveying of any borings for vertical and horizontal control will be provided. • Preparation of supplemental recommendations or analyses not described herein are not included in the geotechnical scope of work. In particular, we understand that retaining walls are currently proposed to be founded on shallow foundations and therefore ground improvement or deep foundation analyses for the approach retaining walls are not included in the geotechnical scope of work. If additional recommendations for design or construction are required, we can provide this additional scope and fee, if requested.
2.13 TASK 13 RIVER HYDRAULICS REPORT
2.13.1 Responsd to Caltrans Review Comments on Draft TSR & Perform Additional Analyses Itemize and respond to review comments from CALTRANS SLA on the Draft Type Selection Report (TSR). This effort may take multiple iterations with revisions and resubmittals of the Final TSR to SLA before getting concurrence to proceed to Final Design.
2.13.2 Final River Hydraulics
For the San Dieguito River, a Final Bridge Hydraulics Report will be prepared. The following tasks will be performed:
• Conduct field review of the site as well as upstream and downstream reaches in order to observe the physical conditions and obtain the necessary hydraulic modeling parameters. • Obtain and review existing hydrologic and hydraulic data including flow rates, aerial photographs, topographic data, FEMA studies, other recent studies, etc. Copies of relevant studies will be obtained for the review.
• Prepare a hydraulic evaluation of the final design alternative using HEC-RAS. The analyses will be based on the accepted 100-year flow rates and topographic mapping provided by the client.
A debris factor will be applied to the bridge piers, if appropriate. The hydraulic analyses will be used to provide the bridge opening dimensions, low chord elevation with consideration given to freeboard requirements, and the bridge alignment.
• Perform final design of the preferred bridge alternative. The design will include tasks necessary to finalize the HEC-RAS analysis of the preferred alternative. In addition, local scour analyses of the piers will be performed to determine additional protection required for these structures. • Prepare a report summarizing the results and recommendations of the analyses. • Prepare a sediment transport analysis to determine the general scour at the bridge. This will ensure that the bridge piers and appurtenances are adequately designed for channel bed scour.
A FLUVIAL-12 analysis will be performed to determine the general scour and a summary of the FLUVIAL-12 analysis results will be included in the report. The FLUVIAL-12 analysis will be based on the 100-year, 200-year, and flood series events. Soil gradations will be provided at three locations in the stream bed.
• Prepare and process a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) based on the final engineering drawings. The CLOMR will be processed through CITY and FEMA. The CITY ATTACHMENT B 131 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge Replacement – Scope of Work
Amendment: Work Stage C – Final Design & Regulatory Permitting Revised 8/3/22 35 | P a g e
A P P E N D I X A
will need to provide the Endangered Species Act requirements for the CLOMR. The CLOMR fee estimate is included with this scope. However, fees are subject to change by the issuing agencies and the CITY will be responsible for covering the difference. CITY will provide all data necessary for levee certification.
• Prepare and process a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) based on the as-built drawings. The LOMR will be processed through CITY and FEMA. The LOMR fee estimate is included with this scope. However, fees are subject to change by the issuing agencies and the CITY will be responsible for covering the difference.
• Provide hydraulic and sediment transport data for the resource regulatory permitting. • Up to three client coordination meetings are assumed for these tasks as well as 5 internal design meetings
• Update River Hydraulics document to incorporate all past CALTRANS review comments on earlier versions of River Hydraulics document.
Deliverables:
• Draft and Final Bridge Hydraulics Report in PDF format
2.14 TASK 14 REGULATORY PERMITTING
Assumptions:
• ENGINEER assumes that Regulatory Permitting delivery schedule will have no restrictions due to bird nesting seasons.
2.14.1 Assist Geotechnical Permits
To provide information needed for preliminary design, geotechnical borings activities will need to be conducted as an early task in the engineering effort. ENGINEER will prepare a Class 6 Categorical Exemption pursuant to Section 15306 of the CEQA Guidelines for COUNTY approval and a Federal Categorical Exclusion pursuant to SAFETEA-LU Section 6004 for approval by CALTRANS. ENGINEER will provide the COUNTY and CALTRANS 10 copies of the CE/CE.
Exploratory geotechnical borings will involve compliance with Sections 401 and 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) and Section 1602 of the CDFG Code, which are expected because borings will be required within the jurisdictional areas of the Santa Ana River.
Permits required for this project will include a Nationwide Permit (NWP) authorization from the USACE to satisfy Section 404 of the CWA, a Water Quality Certification from the RWQCB to satisfy Section 401 of the CWA, and a Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement from the CDFG to satisfy Section 1602 of the CDFG Code. ENGINEER will obtain any necessary permits for geotechnical borings.
Deliverable:
• Categorical Exemption/Categorical Exclusion for Geotechnical Borings
2.14.2 Assist Coastal Development Permit
The construction activities will require a Coastal Development Permit (CDP). ENGINEER anticipates the CITY will prepare and issue the CDP as part of project approval process.
ATTACHMENT B 132 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge Replacement – Scope of Work
Amendment: Work Stage C – Final Design & Regulatory Permitting Revised 8/3/22 36 | P a g e
A P P E N D I X A
ENGINEER anticipates that the California Coastal Commission may appeal the City’s Coastal Development Permit (CDP) issued by the City’s Local Coastal Program (LCP). ENGINEER to assist City by attending meetings and generating documentation to support City.
2.14.3 Section 404 Nationwide Permit 14 (Issued by the Usace) ENGINEER anticipates that Nationwide Permit (NWP) 14 is the appropriate NWP for the proposed construction activities. ENGINEER anticipates that submittal of a Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) will be required for project impacts. SUBCONSULTANT will prepare a PCN, which will include pertinent information, a project description, corresponding figures, a discussion of the biological resources expected to be in the immediate vicinity of the project, an explanation of measures to avoid and minimize impacts to USACE regulated resources including listed species, and proposed project mitigation. Further, National Historic Preservation Act Section 106 compliance (e.g., cultural resources technical report) and CEQA documentation will also be provided to USACE during Section 404 processing. Additionally, copies of the permit applications/notification packages submitted to the RWQCB and CDFW will also be included.
Please note that the USACE Section 408 Civil Works review and permitting process, as applicable, will need to be completed prior to receiving Section 404 authorization. The RWQCB Section 401 Certification, Section 7 consultation, and Section 106 consultation will need to be completed prior issuance of the Section 404 permit.
Note that a USACE Section 408 Permit is not included in this scope. Based on research during Stage B, the project will not impact any USACE facilities.
2.14.4 Section 7 Consultation (with the USFWS concurrent with the Section 404 Nationwide Permit from USACE)
ENGINEER anticipates construction activities will require a Section 7 Consultation for project impacts to federally listed species and compliance with the Endangered Species Act. During the processing of the USACE 404 permit, SUBCONSULTANT will request that the USACE initiate an Informal Section 7 Consultation with the USFWS. SUBCONSULTANT will prepare a Biological Assessment and provide other pertinent documentation, such as the biological resources technical report and habitat mitigation plan, to USFWS during consultation.
2.14.5 Section 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement (Issued by the CDFW) Through provisions of the California Fish and Game Code (Section 1600 et seq.), the CDFW has jurisdiction to enter into agreements for any alteration of a river, stream, or lake (including associated wetland/riparian habitat) where fish or wildlife resources may be adversely affected.
SUBCONSULTANT will prepare and submit a Notification of Streambed Alteration to the CDFW.
Completion of CDFW Notification form is required, along with a detailed cover letter, including figures and various other attachments (e.g., CEQA documentation, habitat mitigation plan, water diversion plan, listed and other special-status species information). Additionally, a signed and stamped copy of the CEQA Notice of Determination (NOD) as well as a copy of the CDFW environmental filing fee payment are required as part of the 1602 submittal package. A check for the 1602 Notification processing fee, based on the estimated cost associated with the activity resulting in impacts to CDFW jurisdiction, will be included in the Notification submittal package; the maximum fee is $5,145.75 for project costs above $350,000.
ATTACHMENT B 133 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Bridge Replacement – Scope of Work
Amendment: Work Stage C – Final Design & Regulatory Permitting Revised 8/3/22 37 | P a g e
A P P E N D I X A
2.14.6 Section 401 Water Quality Certification (Issued by the RWQCB) The construction activities that will require a 404 permit with the USACE will also require a Section 401 Water Quality Certification from the RWQCB. SUBCONSULTANT will prepare a separate application package specific to the RWQCB, including a detailed application form, cover letter, figures, habitat mitigation plan, and fee calculation, for submittal to the RWQCB. The application package addresses water quality and wetland issues, BMPs, flow volumes and velocities, and potential impacts to beneficial water uses. A copy of the Water Quality Management Plan, if available, will be included with the submittal package. In expediting the permit process, it is important to note that the RWQCB will not issue its final authorization until the CEQA document has been certified via NOD and submitted to the RWQCB. The RWQCB requires a Section 401 application filing fee for fill or dredge operations based on the quantity (linear feet and acreage) of fill with respect to waters of the United States. A check for the application filing fee in the amount of $1,500 will be included in the application submittal.
2.14.7 Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Plan (Acceptable to the USACE, USFWS, RWQCB, CDFW, and CCC)
SUBCONSULTANT will prepare a conceptual mitigation plan to address potential options for compensating project impacts on sensitive natural communities and jurisdictional (USACE, RWQCB, CDFW, CCC) waters, wetlands, and associated habitat. The plan will be prepared to satisfy the habitat mitigation requirements for the project, including the anticipated resource agency (USACE, RWQCB, CDFW, CCC) permitting efforts. The plan will identify on- and/or off-site mitigation areas, mitigation type (i.e., establishment /re-establishment, rehabilitation/restoration, enhancement, preservation), conceptual plant palette(s), and conceptual performance standards. The conceptual plan will be provided to the regulatory agencies during the permitting/notification process. Following acceptance of the conceptual plan by the regulatory agencies, SUBCONSULTANT will prepare a detailed Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Plan (HMMP) for the project that will include a description of the mitigation site, details of the target habitat(s), plant seed and/or container palettes, irrigation recommendations, as well as the installation and monitoring methods. The HMMP does not include construction drawings or specifications.
2.14.8 Lease or Lease Amendment (Issued by the California State Lands Commission to Allow Temporary Access onto State Lands During Construction)
ENGINEER will coordinate and assist the CITY to prepare a lease application or lease amendment to be issued by the California State Lands Commission (Commission) to allow temporary access onto state lands during construction. The existing bridge crossing the San Dieguito River is located on State sovereign tide and submerged land under the jurisdiction of the Commission. In June 2000, the Commission authorized the issuance of Lease No. PRC 8181.9 with the CITY for the bridge right-of-way. The project will expand the bridge beyond the existing lease area; therefore, an application for a new lease or an amendment of the existing lease will be required. An application would be submitted to the Commission through the online application portal (OSCAR.slc.ca.gov).
2.14.9 Regulatory Permitting Project Management
SUBCONSULTANT will provide environmental project management to accomplish the Regulatory Permitting for the project.
ATTACHMENT B 134 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Work Stage C – PS&E and Permitting
Revised August 3, 2022
www.kleinfelder.com
EXHIBIT B
FEE PROPOSAL
Revised 9-9-22
ATTACHMENT B 135 June 16, 2026 Item 6
APPENDIX B
COMPENSATION AND FEE SCHEDULE
Table 1 - Tasks Summary
Task Labor Total Cost % of
No. Hours with ODC Total
1.0 PROJECT ADMINISTRATION 2,920 662,254.66 $ 24.8%
2.0 CIVIL DESIGN 560 98,202.37 $ 3.7%
3.0 SURVEYING AND RIGHT OF WAY 160 27,439.61 $ 1.0%
4.0 UTILITY COORDINATION 260 76,692.08 $ 2.9%
5.0 ON-SITE DRAINAGE DESIGN 280 53,397.26 $ 2.0%
6.0 WATER QUALITY DESIGN 224 43,088.91 $ 1.6%
7.0 EROSION CONTROL/SWPPP DESIGN 236 44,489.56 $ 1.7%
8.0 TRAFFIC DESIGN 313 41,573.32 $ 1.6%
9.0 LANDSCAPE DESIGN 535 60,881.95 $ 2.3%
10.0 ROADWAY DESIGN 1,600 262,184.32 $ 9.8%
11.0 BRIDGE AND RETAINING WALL DESIGN 3,674 681,528.21 $ 25.5%
12.0 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN 1,414 368,738.53 $ 13.8%
13.0 RIVER HYDRAULICS REPORT 224 38,080.00 $ 1.4%
14.0 REGULATORY PERMITTING 1,294 213,038.93 $ 8.0%
$ -
Totals = 13,694 2,671,589.70 $ 100%
$ 240,443.07
Total with Escalation = 2,912,032.77 $
Table 2 - Consultant/Subconsultant Summary
No. Consultant DBE SBE Other Total Hours Total Cost % of Task Total Cost Total Cost Total Cost 1 KLEINFELDER (PM, CIVIL, BRIDGE) X 8,754 1,704,169.56 63.8% 2 KLEINFELDER (GEOTECHNICAL) 1,414 368,738.53 $ 13.8%
3 SAN DIEGUITO ENGINEERS X X 1,160 245,107.42 $ 9.2%
4 TATSUMI & PARTNERS X X 535 60,881.95 $ 2.3%
5 CHANG CONSULTANTS X 224 38,080.00 $ 1.4%
6 STC TRAFFIC X 313 41,573.32 $ 1.6%
7 HELIX ENVIRONMENTAL X 1,294 213,038.93 $ 8.0%
8 MERKEL & ASSOCIATES X X
Totals = 13,694 2,671,589.70 $ 100.0% $ -
$ 240,443.07
$ 2,912,032.77
Estimated DBE % = 11.5%
Estimated SBE % = 22.4%
Task Description
CAMINO DEL MAR BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
WORK STAGE C: PS&E AND AGENCY PERMITTING
Escalation (1.5 years to mid-point of Stage C) =
Total with Escalation =
Escalation (1.5 years to mid-point of Stage C) =
Revised 8/3/22 APPENDIX B - FEE SCHEDULE 1 of 9
1 of 20 Revised 9-9-22
ATTACHMENT B 136 June 16, 2026 Item 6
APPENDIX B
COMPENSATION AND FEE SCHEDULE
TASK ANALYSIS
COST SUMMARY PER FIRM
San Dieguito HELIX Chang Tatsumi and STC Merkel TOTAL
Engineering Environmental Consultants Partners Traffic
TASK DESCRIPTION
1.0 PROJECT ADMINISTRATION
1.1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT $ 317,168.25 $ 317,168.25
1.2 QUALITY AND RISK MANAGEMENT $ 64,770.16 $ 64,770.16
1.3 CONDUCT PROJECT DEVELOPMENT TEAM MEETINGS 80,516.82 $ $ 80,516.82
1.4 BUDGETING AND COST ACCOUNTING $ 101,648.37 $ 101,648.37
1.5 SCHEDULING $ 19,861.94 $ 19,861.94
1.6 CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION $ 29,080.18 $ 29,080.18
1.7 SUPPORT FOR LOCAL ASSISTANCE DOCUMENTS 38,427.69 $ $ 38,427.69 $ - $ -
ODCs not specific to a Subtask (General) $ 10,781.25 $ 10,781.25 SUBTOTAL $ - 662,254.66 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 662,254.66 $
2.0 CIVIL DESIGN
2.1 PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT (ESA) 50,567.30 $ $ 50,567.30
2.2 RIGHT OF ENTRY PERMITS $ 13,504.23 $ 13,504.23
2.3 FINAL RIGHT OF WAY REQUIREMENTS MAP 20,626.60 $ $ 20,626.60
2.4 DESIGN EXCEPTIONS $ 13,504.23 $ 13,504.23
$ - $ -
ODCs not specific to a Subtask (General) $ -
SUBTOTAL $ - 98,202.37 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 98,202.37 $
3.0 SURVEYING AND RIGHT OF WAY
3.1 RESEARCH AND DATA GATHERING $ 3,720.67 $ 3,720.67
3.2 DESIGN SURVEYS $ 14,270.67 $ 14,270.67
3.3 POTHOLE SURVEYS $ 4,990.71 $ 4,990.71
3.4 PLATS AND LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS FOR TCEs $ 4,457.56 $ 4,457.56 ODCs not specific to a Subtask (General) $ - $ -
SUBTOTAL $ - - $ 27,439.61 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 27,439.61 $
4.0 UTILITY COORDINATION
4.1 UTILITY VERIFICATION, RELOCATION, AND COORDINATION $ 17,248.45 $ 17,248.45
4.2 UTILITY POTHOLING $ 28,343.33 $ 28,343.33
4.3 FINAL UTILITY PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS $ 31,100.30 $ 31,100.30 ODCs not specific to a Subtask (General) $ -
SUBTOTAL $ - - $ 76,692.08 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 76,692.08 $
FIRM NAME KLEINFELDER
PM, Cv, Br
KLEINFELDER
Geotech
Revised 8/3/22
Revised 9-9-22
APPENDIX B - FEE SCHEDULE 3 of 9
2 of 20
ATTACHMENT B 137 June 16, 2026 Item 6
APPENDIX B
COMPENSATION AND FEE SCHEDULE
TASK ANALYSIS
COST SUMMARY PER FIRM
San Dieguito HELIX Chang Tatsumi and STC Merkel TOTAL
Engineering Environmental Consultants Partners Traffic
TASK DESCRIPTION
FIRM NAME KLEINFELDER
PM, Cv, Br
KLEINFELDER
Geotech
5.0 ON-SITE DRAINAGE DESIGN
5.1 UPDATE ON-SITE DRAINAGE REPORT $ 15,926.40 $ 15,926.40
5.2 ON-SITE DRAINAGE DESIGN $ 35,878.22 $ 35,878.22
5.3 COORDINATE WITH BRIDGE DRAINAGE $ 1,592.64 $ 1,592.64 ODCs not specific to a Subtask (General) $ - $ -
SUBTOTAL $ - - $ 53,397.26 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 53,397.26 $
6.0 WATER QUALITY DESIGN
6.1 UPDATE WATER QUALITY REPORT $ 12,741.12 $ 12,741.12
6.2 WATER QUALITY DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION PLANS $ 23,977.23 $ 23,977.23
6.3 BMP MAINTENANCE PLAN $ 6,370.56 $ 6,370.56
ODCs not specific to a Subtask (General) $ - $ -
SUBTOTAL $ - - $ 43,088.91 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 43,088.91 $
7.0 EROSION CONTROL/SWPPP DESIGN
7.1 EROSION CONTOL PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ESTIMATE $ 33,341.08 $ 33,341.08
7.2 PREPARE DRAFT SWPPP FOR CONTRACTOR ADOPTION $ 11,148.48 $ 11,148.48 ODCs not specific to a Subtask (General) $ - $ -
SUBTOTAL $ - - $ 44,489.56 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 44,489.56 $
8.0 TRAFFIC DESIGN
8.1 FINAL TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN (TMP) $ 5,676.47 $ 5,676.47
8.2 SIGNING AND STRIPING PLANS $ 20,489.58 $ 20,489.58
8.3 SIGNING AND STRIPING SPECIAL PROVISIONS AND COST
ESTIMATE $ 4,094.83 $ 4,094.83
8.4 TRAFFIC CONTROL DESIGN $ 9,112.67 $ 9,112.67
8.5 TRAFFIC CONTROL SPECIAL PROVISIONS AND COST ESTIMATE $ 2,199.77 $ 2,199.77 $ -
ODCs not specific to a Subtask (General) $ - $ -
SUBTOTAL $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 41,573.32 $ - $ 41,573.32 $ Revised 8/3/22
Revised 9-9-22
APPENDIX B - FEE SCHEDULE 4 of 9
3 of 20
ATTACHMENT B 138 June 16, 2026 Item 6
APPENDIX B
COMPENSATION AND FEE SCHEDULE
TASK ANALYSIS
COST SUMMARY PER FIRM
San Dieguito HELIX Chang Tatsumi and STC Merkel TOTAL
Engineering Environmental Consultants Partners Traffic
TASK DESCRIPTION
FIRM NAME KLEINFELDER
PM, Cv, Br
KLEINFELDER
Geotech
9.0 LANDSCAPE DESIGN
9.1 PLANTING DESIGN $ - $ -
9.1.1 PLANTING & DEMO PLANS, DETAILS, AND NOTES $ 15,327.34 $ 15,327.34
9.1.2 PLANTING & DEMO QUANTITIES AND SPECIFICATIONS $ 3,946.61 $ 3,946.61
9.2 IRRIGATION DESIGN $ - $ -
9.2.1 IRRIGATION & DEMO PLANS, DETAILS, AND NOTES $ 8,273.65 $ 8,273.65
9.2.2 IRRIGATION & DEMO QUANTITIES AND SPECIFICATIONS $ 3,690.40 $ 3,690.40
9.3 ARCHITECTUAL DESIGN $ - $ -
9.3.1 BRIDGE AESTHETICS DESIGN AND DETAILS $ 11,763.17 $ 11,763.17
9.3.2 HARDSCAPE PLANS, DETAILS, AN NOTES $ 8,466.45 $ 8,466.45
9.3.3 HARDSCAPE QUANTITIES AND SPECIFICATIONS $ 2,623.77 $ 2,623.77
9.3.4 ARCHITECTURAL VISUAL SIMULATIONS $ 6,383.05 $ 6,383.05 $ - $ -
ODCs not specific to a Subtask (General) $ 407.50 $ 407.50 SUBTOTAL $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ 60,881.95 $ - $ - $ 60,881.95 $
10.0 ROADWAY DESIGN
10.1 RESPOND TO CALTRANS REVIEW COMMENTS ON DRAFT TSR & PERFORM ADDITIONAL ANALYSES $ 37,709.53 $ 37,709.53
10.2 ROADWAY GEOMETRIC APPROVAL PLANS 15,246.47 $ $ 15,246.47
10.3 ROADWAY PLANS AND STAGE CONSTRUCTION 30,463.34 $ $ 30,463.34
10.4 ROADWAY CALCULATIONS $ 45,941.45 $ 45,941.45
10.5 65% PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND ESTIMATE 41,891.02 $ $ 41,891.02
10.6 90% PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND ESTIMATE 41,585.40 $ $ 41,585.40
10.7 100% PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND ESTIMATE 27,363.31 $ $ 27,363.31
10.8 FINAL PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND ESTIMATE 21,983.79 $ $ 21,983.79 $ -
ODCs not specific to a Subtask (General) $ -
SUBTOTAL $ - 262,184.32 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 262,184.32 $
11.0 BRIDGE AND RETAINING WALL DESIGN
11.1 RESPOND TO CALTRANS REVIEW COMMENTS ON DRAFT TSR & PERFORM ADDITIONAL ANALYSES $ 49,544.90 $ 49,544.90
11.2 FINAL TYPE SELECTION REPORT $ 40,691.33 $ 40,691.33
11.3 BRIDGE AND STRUCTURES CALCULATIONS 375,388.16 $ $ 375,388.16
11.4 65% PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND ESTIMATE 105,443.49 $ $ 105,443.49
11.5 90% PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND ESTIMATE 57,930.29 $ $ 57,930.29
11.6 100% PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND ESTIMATE 29,624.29 $ $ 29,624.29
11.7 FINAL PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND ESTIMATE 22,905.75 $ $ 22,905.75 $ - $ -
ODCs not specific to a Subtask (General) $ -
SUBTOTAL $ - 681,528.21 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 681,528.21 $ Revised 8/3/22
Revised 9-9-22
APPENDIX B - FEE SCHEDULE 5 of 9
4 of 20
ATTACHMENT B 139 June 16, 2026 Item 6
APPENDIX B
COMPENSATION AND FEE SCHEDULE
TASK ANALYSIS
COST SUMMARY PER FIRM
San Dieguito HELIX Chang Tatsumi and STC Merkel TOTAL
Engineering Environmental Consultants Partners Traffic
TASK DESCRIPTION
FIRM NAME KLEINFELDER
PM, Cv, Br
KLEINFELDER
Geotech
12.0 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN
12.1 RESPOND TO CALTRANS REVIEW COMMENTS ON DRAFT TSR & PERFORM ADDITIONAL ANALYSES $ 30,816.95 $ 30,816.95
12.2 PRE-FIELD ACTIVITIES $ 15,679.72 $ 15,679.72
12.3 FIELD INVESTIGATION $ 21,037.89 $ 21,037.89
12.4 FINAL FOUNDATION REPORT $ 82,491.42 $ 82,491.42
12.5 FINAL GEOTECH DESIGN REPORT $ 39,948.26 $ 39,948.26
12.6 MATERIALS REPORT $ 16,166.12 $ 16,166.12
12.7 PLANS, SPECS, & ESTIMATES SUPPORT $ 27,295.67 $ 27,295.67 $ -
ODCs not specific to a Subtask (General) $ 135,302.50 $ 135,302.50 SUBTOTAL $ 368,738.53 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 368,738.53 $
13.0 RIVER HYDRAULICS REPORT
13.1 RESPOND TO CALTRANS REVIEW COMMENTS ON DRAFT TSR & PERFORM ADDITIONAL ANALYSES $ 8,160.00 $ 8,160.00
13.2 FINAL RIVER HYDRAULICS REPORT $ 29,920.00 $ 29,920.00 $ -
ODCs not specific to a Subtask (General) $ -
SUBTOTAL $ - - $ - $ - $ 38,080.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 38,080.00 $ Revised 8/3/22
Revised 9-9-22
APPENDIX B - FEE SCHEDULE
5 of 20
6 of 9
ATTACHMENT B 140 June 16, 2026 Item 6
APPENDIX B
COMPENSATION AND FEE SCHEDULE
TASK ANALYSIS
COST SUMMARY PER FIRM
San Dieguito HELIX Chang Tatsumi and STC Merkel TOTAL
Engineering Environmental Consultants Partners Traffic
TASK DESCRIPTION
FIRM NAME KLEINFELDER
PM, Cv, Br
KLEINFELDER
Geotech
14.0 REGULATORY PERMITTING
14.1 ASSIST GEOTECHNCIAL PERMITS $ 18,913.55 $ 18,913.55
14.2 ASSIST COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT $ 21,331.14 $ 21,331.14
14.3 SECTION 404 NATIONWIDE PERMIT 14 $ 27,446.34 $ 27,446.34
14.4 SECTION 7 CONSULTATION $ 21,483.00 $ 21,483.00
14.5 SECTION 1602 STREAMBED ALTERATION AGREEMENT $ 22,982.84 $ 22,982.84
14.6 SECTION 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION $ 30,139.37 $ 30,139.37
14.7 HABITAT MITIGATION AND MONITORING PLAN $ 32,317.67 $ 32,317.67
14.8 SECTION 106 CONSULTATION $ 11,041.18 $ 11,041.18
14.9 AGENCY PERMITTING PROJECT MANAGEMENT $ 23,828.85 $ 23,828.85 $ -
ODCs not specific to a Subtask (General) $ 3,555.00 $ 3,555.00 SUBTOTAL $ - - $ - $ 213,038.93 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 213,038.93 $ TOTALS $ 368,738.53 1,704,169.56 $ 245,107.42 $ 213,038.93 $ 38,080.00 $ 60,881.95 $ 41,573.32 $ - $ 2,671,589.70 $ San Dieguito HELIX Chang Tatsumi and STC Merkel
Engineering Environmental Consultants Partners Traffic
KLEINFELDER
PM, Cv, Br
KLEINFELDER
Geotech
Revised 8/3/22
Revised 9-9-22
APPENDIX B - FEE SCHEDULE 7 of 9
6 of 20
ATTACHMENT B 141 June 16, 2026 Item 6
APPENDIX B
COMPENSATION AND FEE SCHEDULE
TASK ANALYSIS
PRIME CONSULTANT - KLEINFELDER
PROJECT CIVIL BRIDGE ASSISTANT SEISMIC BRIDGE SENIOR BRIDGE QA/QC STAFF STAFF SENIOR SENIOR SENIOR PROJECT ADMIN TOTAL COST MANAGER LEAD LEAD MANAGER SPECIALIST ENGINEER TECHNICIAN ENGINEER MANAGER PROF. PROF. ENGINEER CADD PROF. PROF. ASSISTANT ODCs Jim Don Nganha Eric Sami Jake Ty Colby Pratima John Anna Jason Janet Liz Stefan Laura Frost Bloodworth Vu Buckwalter Megally Montgomery Brittain Cushing Gatehouse Maninang Thompson Brown Patay Simmons Birardi Anderson
1.0 PROJECT ADMINISTRATION
1.1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT 460 960 40 1460 317,168.25 $
1.2 QUALITY AND RISK MANAGEMENT $ 12,500.00 200 200 64,770.16 $
1.3 CONDUCT PROJECT DEVELOPMENT TEAM MEETINGS 80 80 80 120 360 80,516.82 $
1.4 BUDGETING AND COST ACCOUNTING 120 120 40 240 520 101,648.37 $
1.5 SCHEDULING 40 40 80 19,861.94 $
1.6 CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION 80 40 40 160 29,080.18 $
1.7 SUPPORT FOR LOCAL ASSISTANCE DOCUMENTS 80 20 40 140 38,427.69 $ $ -
ODCs not specific to a Subtask (General) 10,781.25 $ $ 10,781.25 SUBTOTAL 780 100 120 1320 280 320 2920 662,254.66 $
2.0 CIVIL DESIGN
2.1 PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT (ESA) 12,500.00 $ 4 13 90 100 13 220 50,567.30 $
2.2 RIGHT OF ENTRY PERMITS 20 40 40 100 13,504.23 $
2.3 FINAL RIGHT OF WAY REQUIREMENTS MAP 40 50 50 140 20,626.60 $
2.4 DESIGN EXCEPTIONS 20 40 40 100 13,504.23 $
$ -
ODCs not specific to a Subtask (General) $ -
SUBTOTAL 84 130 130 13 90 100 13 560 98,202.37 $
10.0 ROADWAY DESIGN
10.1 RESPOND TO CALTRANS REVIEW COMMENTS ON DRAFT TSR
& PERFORM ADDITIONAL ANALYSES 120 20 20 20 180 37,709.53 $
10.2 ROADWAY GEOMETRIC APPROVAL PLANS 20 40 40 10 110 15,246.47 $
10.3 ROADWAY PLANS AND STAGE CONSTRUCTION 60 40 40 40 180 30,463.34 $
10.4 ROADWAY CALCULATIONS 60 80 80 80 300 45,941.45 $
10.5 65% PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND ESTIMATE 80 80 60 40 260 41,891.02 $
10.6 90% PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND ESTIMATE 60 40 80 80 260 41,585.40 $
10.7 100% PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND ESTIMATE 50 60 30 30 170 27,363.31 $
10.8 FINAL PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND ESTIMATE 40 40 40 20 140 21,983.79 $ $ -
ODCs not specific to a Subtask (General) $ -
SUBTOTAL 490 400 390 320 1600 262,184.32 $
Revised 8/3/22 Revised 9-9-22 APPENDIX B - FEE SCHEDULE 8 of 9 7 of 20 ATTACHMENT B 142 June 16, 2026 Item 6
APPENDIX B
COMPENSATION AND FEE SCHEDULE
TASK ANALYSIS
PRIME CONSULTANT - KLEINFELDER
PROJECT CIVIL BRIDGE ASSISTANT SEISMIC BRIDGE SENIOR BRIDGE QA/QC STAFF STAFF SENIOR SENIOR SENIOR PROJECT ADMIN TOTAL COST MANAGER LEAD LEAD MANAGER SPECIALIST ENGINEER TECHNICIAN ENGINEER MANAGER PROF. PROF. ENGINEER CADD PROF. PROF. ASSISTANT ODCs Jim Don Nganha Eric Sami Jake Ty Colby Pratima John Anna Jason Janet Liz Stefan Laura Frost Bloodworth Vu Buckwalter Megally Montgomery Brittain Cushing Gatehouse Maninang Thompson Brown Patay Simmons Birardi Anderson
11.0 BRIDGE AND RETAINING WALL DESIGN
11.1 RESPOND TO CALTRANS REVIEW COMMENTS ON DRAFT TSR
& PERFORM ADDITIONAL ANALYSES 20 80 54 80 20 254 49,544.90 $
11.2 FINAL TYPE SELECTION REPORT 4 20 100 8 60 26 8 226 40,691.33 $
11.3 BRIDGE AND STRUCTURES CALCULATIONS 600 400 600 400 2000 375,388.16 $
11.4 65% PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND ESTIMATE 4 160 120 300 584 105,443.49 $
11.5 90% PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND ESTIMATE 4 80 80 160 324 57,930.29 $
11.6 100% PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND ESTIMATE 4 40 40 80 164 29,624.29 $
11.7 FINAL PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND ESTIMATE 2 20 20 80 122 22,905.75 $ $ -
ODCs not specific to a Subtask (General) $ -
SUBTOTAL 38 20 1080 462 1000 666 408 3674 681,528.21 $
Totals = 8754 1,704,169.56 $
N/A 818 694 1200 1320 462 1000 666 408 280 530 520 320 13 90 100 333 $ - $ 173,329.28 269,590.39 $ 212,004.00 $ 220,408.06 $ 125,501.84 $ 126,300.00 $ 134,758.44 $ 86,645.49 $ 73,178.22 $ 57,717.64 $ 53,990.35 $ 55,751.62 $ 1,736.47 $ 22,874.69 $ 10,745.00 $ 43,856.83 $ 2022 Hourly Rate Schedule
PROJECT CIVIL BRIDGE ASSISTANT SEISMIC BRIDGE SENIOR BRIDGE QA/QC STAFF STAFF SENIOR SENIOR SENIOR PROJECT ADMIN MANAGER LEAD LEAD MANAGER SPECIALIST ENGINEER TECHNICIAN ENGINEER MANAGER PROF. PROF. ENGINEER CADD PROF. PROF. ASSISTANT AVERAGE $ 249.75 329.57 $ 176.67 $ 166.98 $ 271.65 $ 126.30 $ 202.34 $ 212.37 $ 261.35 $ 108.90 $ 103.83 $ 174.22 $ 133.57 $ 254.16 $ 107.45 $ 131.70 $ $ 188.18 Revised 8/3/22 Revised 9-9-22 APPENDIX B - FEE SCHEDULE 8 of 20 9 of 9 ATTACHMENT B 143 June 16, 2026 Item 6
APPENDIX B
COMPENSATION AND FEE SCHEDULE
TASK ANALYSIS
PRIME CONSULTANT - KLEINFELDER
QUANTITY TOTAL QUANTITY TOTAL QUANTITY TOTAL
1 Repro & Graphics LS 2,000.00 $ 1 2,000.00 $ - $ 1 2,000.00 $ 2 Deliveries LS 2,000.00 $ 1 2,000.00 $ - $ 1 2,000.00 $ 3 Mileage and Parking MI 0.625 $ 1250 781.25 $ - $ 1250 781.25 $ 4 Scanning LS 1,000.00 $ 1 1,000.00 $ - $ 1 1,000.00 $
5 AVETTA SAFTEY LS 12,500.00 $ 1 12,500.00 $ - $ 1 12,500.00 $ 6 Phase II ESA (Subs) LS 12,500.00 $ - $ 1 12,500.00 $ 1 12,500.00 $ 7 Hardcopy Plots LS 5,000.00 $ 1 5,000.00 $ - $ 1 5,000.00 $ Subtotal = 23,281.25 $ Subtotal = 12,500.00 $ $ 35,781.25 ODC Item UNIT COST Description UNIT
TASK 1
Project Management
TASK 2
CIVIL DESIGN
TOTALS
Revised 9-9-22
Revised 8/3/22 APPENDIX B - FEE SCHEDULE 9 of 20
ATTACHMENT B 144 June 16, 2026 Item 6
APPENDIX B
COMPENSATION AND FEE SCHEDULE
TASK ANALYSIS
GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT - KLEINFELDER
SENIOR PROJECT SENIOR STAFF PROJECT PROJECT PRINCIPAL STAFF SENIOR ADMIN TOTAL COST
PM MANAGER PROF PROF II PROF PROF PROF PROF I TECH MNGR ASSISTANT ODCs Rob Kevin Senior Spencer Janet Janna Scott Allen Zia Laura Torres Crennan Professional Floyd Patay Bonfiglio Rugg Wante Zafir Anderson
12.0 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN
12.1 RESPOND TO CALTRANS REVIEW COMMENTS ON DRAFT
TSR & PERFORM ADDITIONAL ANALYSES $ 4 18 24 16 100 12 174 30,816.95 3,668.75 $
12.2 PRE-FIELD ACTIVITIES 131,633.75 $ 4 84 4 21 3 116 15,679.72 $
12.3 FIELD INVESTIGATION 5 137 9 8 159 21,037.89 $
12.4 FINAL FOUNDATION REPORT 16 22 56 12 290 18 24 46 4 488 82,491.42 $
12.5 FINAL GEOTECH DESIGN REPORT 16 16 28 12 124 9 16 12 4 237 39,948.26 $
12.6 MATERIALS REPORT 16 56 28 2 102 16,166.12 $
12.7 PLANS, SPECS, & ESTIMATES SUPPORT 42 92 4 138 27,295.67 $ ODCs not specific to a Subtask (General) 135,302.50 $ 135,302.50 $ SUBTOTAL 103 56 24 377 28 664 35 40 70 17 1414 368,738.53 $ check
N/A 103 56 24 377 28 664 35 40 70 17 1414
$ 12,318.70 29,609.80 $ 4,681.27 $ 45,985.63 $ 3,740.09 $ 106,059.26 $ 6,352.57 $ 4,356.05 $ 18,093.73 $ 2,238.94 $ $ 233,436.03 $ 135,302.50
$ 368,738.53
2022 Hourly Rate Schedule
SENIOR PROJECT SENIOR STAFF PROJECT PROJECT PRINCIPAL STAFF SENIOR ADMIN
PM MANAGER PROF PROF II PROF PROF PROF PROF I TECH MNGR ASSISTANT AVERAGE $ 219.98 287.47 $ 195.05 $ 121.98 $ 133.57 $ 159.73 $ 181.50 $ 108.90 $ 258.48 $ 131.70 $ 179.84 $ Revised 8/3/22 APPENDIX B - FEE SCHEDULE 10 of 20
Revised 9-9-22
ATTACHMENT B 145 June 16, 2026 Item 6
APPENDIX B
COMPENSATION AND FEE SCHEDULE
TASK ANALYSIS
GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT - KLEINFELDER
Description UNIT QUANTITY TOTAL QUANTITY TOTAL QUANTITY TOTAL
1.1 ROW Permit EA 2,500.00 $ 1 2,500.00 $ - $ 1 2,500.00 $
1.2 DEH Permit EA 1,000.00 $ 1 1,000.00 $ - $ 1 1,000.00 $ $ - - $ $ -
2.0 A Laboratory Tests $ - - $ $ -
2.1 DIRECT SHEAR, 3 POINTS EA 390.00 $ - $ 8 3,120.00 $ 8 3,120.00 $
2.2 MODIFIED PROCTOR, 4" MOLD EA 245.00 $ - $ 2 490.00 $ 2 490.00 $
2.3 WATER CONTENT AND DRY
UNIT WEIGHT EA 45.00 $ - $ 24 1,080.00 $ 24 1,080.00 $
2.4 RESISTANCE R-VALUE EA 325.00 $ - $ 2 650.00 $ 2 650.00 $
2.5 ATTERBERG LIMITS, ONE-POINT
METHOD EA 120.00 $ - $ 10 1,200.00 $ 10 1,200.00 $
2.6 HYDROMETER ANALYSIS EA 185.00 $ - $ 6 1,110.00 $ 6 1,110.00 $
2.7 SIEVE ANALYSIS, COARSE EA 130.00 $ - $ 20 2,600.00 $ 20 2,600.00 $
2.8 STABILIZED SOIL UC
STRENGTH, 1 POINT EA 175.00 $ - $ 4 700.00 $ 4 700.00 $
2.9 TRIAXIAL SHEAR, UU, 1 POINT EA 210.00 $ - $ 4 840.00 $ 4 840.00 $ $ - - $ $ -
2.0 B Subconsultants $ - - $ $ -
2.10 Pacific Drilling LS 64,000.00 $ - $ 1 64,000.00 $ 1 64,000.00 $
2.11 Belshire LS 7,000.00 $ - $ 1 7,000.00 $ 1 7,000.00 $
2.12 ACME LS 14,000.00 $ - $ 1 14,000.00 $ 1 14,000.00 $
2.13 Fugro LS 27,000.00 $ - $ 1 27,000.00 $ 1 27,000.00 $
2.14 Atlas LS 2,200.00 $ - $ 1 2,200.00 $ 1 2,200.00 $
2.15 Cut-n-Core LS 4,800.00 $ - $ 1 4,800.00 $ 1 4,800.00 $ $ - - $ $ -
3 Deliveries LS - $ - $ $ -
4 Mileage MI 0.625 $ 270 168.75 $ 1350 843.75 $ 1620 1,012.50 $ 5 Scanning LS - $ - $ $ -
6 Other (Photo, etc.) LS - $ - $ $ -
7 Parking EA - $ - $ $ -
8 Potholing LS - $ - $ $ -
Subtotal = 3,668.75 $ Subtotal = 131,633.75 $ $ 135,302.50 TASK 12.2 TASK 12.3
UNIT COST ODC
Item
TOTALS
Pre-Field Activities Field Investigation
Revised 8/3/22 APPENDIX B - FEE SCHEDULE 11 of 20
Revised 9-9-22
ATTACHMENT B 146 June 16, 2026 Item 6
APPENDIX B
COMPENSATION AND FEE SCHEDULE
TASK ANALYSIS
SUBCONSULTANT - SAN DIEGUITO
CIVIL PRINCIPAL SURVEY SURVEY STAFF SENIOR SENIOR SENIOR SENIOR TOTAL COST
LEAD SURVEYOR PARTY CHIEF CHAINMAN SURVEYOR DRAFTSMAN ENGINEER ENGINEER DESIGNER ODCs Annie Kevin Byram Mark Byram Mark Joshua Raymond Arnel Aguilar McHugh Jennex Moon Jennex Moon Reeves Escobar Biltz
3.0 SURVEYING AND RIGHT OF WAY
3.1 RESEARCH AND DATA GATHERING 6 9 9 24 3,720.67 $
3.2 DESIGN SURVEYS 4 30 30 8 8 80 14,270.67 $
3.3 POTHOLE SURVEYS 1 12 12 1 1 27 4,990.71 $
3.4 PLATS AND LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS FOR TCEs 7 10 12 29 4,457.56 $ $ -
ODCs not specific to a Subtask (General) $ -
SUBTOTAL 18 42 42 28 30 160 27,439.61 $
4.0 UTILITY COORDINATION
4.1 UTILITY VERIFICATION, RELOCATION, AND COORDINATION 8 24 60 92 17,248.45 $
4.2 UTILITY POTHOLING $ - 28,343.33 28,343.33 $
4.3 FINAL UTILITY PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 8 40 120 168 31,100.30 $ $ -
ODCs not specific to a Subtask (General) $ -
SUBTOTAL 16 64 180 260 76,692.08 $
5.0 ON-SITE DRAINAGE DESIGN
5.1 UPDATE ON-SITE DRAINAGE REPORT 80 80 15,926.40 $
5.2 ON-SITE DRAINAGE DESIGN 8 40 24 120 192 35,878.22 $
5.3 COORDINATE WITH BRIDGE DRAINAGE 8 8 1,592.64 $
$ -
ODCs not specific to a Subtask (General) $ -
SUBTOTAL 8 40 112 120 280 53,397.26 $
6.0 WATER QUALITY DESIGN
6.1 UPDATE WATER QUALITY REPORT 64 64 12,741.12 $
6.2 WATER QUALITY DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION PLANS 8 24 16 80 128 23,977.23 $
6.3 BMP MAINTENANCE PLAN 32 32 6,370.56 $
$ -
ODCs not specific to a Subtask (General) $ -
SUBTOTAL 8 24 112 80 224 43,088.91 $
Revised 8/3/22 APPENDIX B - FEE SCHEDULE 12 of 20
Revised 9-9-22
ATTACHMENT B 147 June 16, 2026 Item 6
APPENDIX B
COMPENSATION AND FEE SCHEDULE
TASK ANALYSIS
SUBCONSULTANT - SAN DIEGUITO
CIVIL PRINCIPAL SURVEY SURVEY STAFF SENIOR SENIOR SENIOR SENIOR TOTAL COST
LEAD SURVEYOR PARTY CHIEF CHAINMAN SURVEYOR DRAFTSMAN ENGINEER ENGINEER DESIGNER ODCs Annie Kevin Byram Mark Byram Mark Joshua Raymond Arnel Aguilar McHugh Jennex Moon Jennex Moon Reeves Escobar Biltz
7.0 EROSION CONTROL/SWPPP DESIGN
7.1 EROSION CONTOL PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ESTIMATE 60 120 180 33,341.08 $
7.2 PREPARE DRAFT SWPPP FOR CONTRACTOR ADOPTION 56 56 11,148.48 $ $ -
ODCs not specific to a Subtask (General) $ -
SUBTOTAL 60 56 120 236 44,489.56 $
1160 245,107.42 $
check
N/A 32 18 42 42 28 30 188 280 500 1160
$ - $ 7,143.69 $ 3,986.43 $ 8,053.08 $ 7,709.10 $ 3,946.17 $ 3,744.83 $ 37,850.98 $ 55,742.41 $ 88,587.40 $ 216,764.09 $ 28,343.33
2022 Hourly Rate Schedule
CIVIL PRINCIPAL SURVEY SURVEY STAFF SENIOR SENIOR SENIOR SENIOR
LEAD SURVEYOR PARTY CHIEF CHAINMAN SURVEYOR DRAFTSMAN ENGINEER ENGINEER DESIGNER AVERAGE $ 221.47 223.24 $ 191.74 $ 183.55 $ 140.93 $ 124.83 $ 201.34 $ 199.08 $ 177.17 $ $ 184.82 Revised 8/3/22 APPENDIX B - FEE SCHEDULE 13 of 20
Revised 9-9-22
ATTACHMENT B 148 June 16, 2026 Item 6
APPENDIX B
COMPENSATION AND FEE SCHEDULE
TASK ANALYSIS
SUBCONSULTANT - SAN DIEGUITO
ODC Item Description UNIT UNIT COST QUANTITY TOTAL QUANTITY TOTAL 1 Pothole Consultant LS 28,343.33 $ 1 28,343.33 $ 1 28,343.33 $ 2 Repo & Graphics LS - $ $ -
3 Mileage MI - $ $ -
4 Title Reports LS - $ $ -
5 Deliveries LS - $ $ -
6 Parking EA - $ $ -
$ - $ -
Subtotal = 28,343.33 $ $ 28,343.33
TASK 3 TOTALS
Design Surveys
Revised 8/3/22 APPENDIX B - FEE SCHEDULE 14 of 20
Revised 9-9-22
ATTACHMENT B 149 June 16, 2026 Item 6
APPENDIX B
COMPENSATION AND FEE SCHEDULE
TASK ANALYSIS
SUBCONSULTANT - HELIX
PRINCIPAL BIO PROJECT BIO PROJECT SENIOR SENIOR BIOLOGIST BIOLOGIST SR CULTURAL STAFF PRINCIPAL ENVI PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL GIS GIS WORD WORD CLERICAL TOTAL COST
BIOLOGIST MANAGER MANAGER SCIENTIST SCIENTIST PROJ MGR ARCHAEOLOGIST PLANNER MANAGER PLANNER SPECIALIST SPECIALIST PROCESSOR PROCESSOR ODCs Karl Thomas Amber Sally Laura Angelia Dane Stacie James Vanessa Hunter Ellia Camille Sean Linda Ana Cassidy Osmundson Liddicoat Anderson Trnka Moreton Bottiani van Tamelen (Bietz) Wilson Turner Toscano Stapp Simmons Lill Bohac Garcia Topete Carig
14.0 REGULATORY PERMITTING
14.1 ASSIST GEOTECHNCIAL PERMITS 20 20 8 8 16 20 8 4 4 2 110 18,913.55 $
14.2 ASSIST COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 40 10 20 10 8 2 90 21,331.14 $
14.3 SECTION 404 NATIONWIDE PERMIT 14 16 12 40 24 20 10 40 8 4 2 176 27,446.34 $
14.4 SECTION 7 CONSULTATION 12 12 32 20 10 16 24 8 6 2 142 21,483.00 $
14.5 SECTION 1602 STREAMBED ALTERATION AGREEMENT 16 12 30 30 10 30 8 6 2 144 22,982.84 $
14.6 SECTION 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION 16 50 40 20 40 8 6 2 182 30,139.37 $
14.7 HABITAT MITIGATION AND MONITORING PLAN 12 10 24 37 30 20 12 50 12 10 2 219 32,317.67 $
14.8 SECTION 106 CONSULTATION 36 28 6 4 2 76 11,041.18 $
14.9 AGENCY PERMITTING PROJECT MANAGEMENT 25 130 155 23,828.85 $ $ -
ODCs not specific to a Subtask (General) $ 3,555.00 3,555.00 $ SUBTOTAL 132 131 316 61 60 20 50 36 28 28 8 16 104 192 56 40 16 1294 213,038.93 $ check
N/A 132 131 316 61 60 20 50 36 28 28 8 16 104 192 56 40 16 1294 $ - $ 41,184.89 $ 22,848.86 $ 47,323.13 $ 9,936.84 $ 8,204.66 $ 2,218.28 $ 5,067.07 $ 6,525.57 $ 2,958.40 $ 5,896.81 $ 1,009.07 $ 1,349.92 $ 19,060.87 $ 24,971.44 $ 6,592.80 $ 3,374.80 $ 960.52 $ 209,483.93 $ 3,555.00
2022 Hourly Rate Schedule
PRINCIPAL BIO PROJECT BIO PROJECT SENIOR SENIOR BIOLOGIST BIOLOGIST SR CULTURAL STAFF PRINCIPAL ENVI PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL GIS GIS WORD WORD CLERICAL
BIOLOGIST MANAGER MANAGER SCIENTIST SCIENTIST PROJ MGR ARCHAEOLOGIST PLANNER MANAGER PLANNER SPECIALIST SPECIALIST PROCESSOR PROCESSOR AVERAGE $ 174.42 312.01 $ 149.76 $ 162.90 $ 136.74 $ 110.91 $ 101.34 $ 181.27 $ 105.66 $ 210.60 $ 126.13 $ 84.37 $ 183.28 $ 130.06 $ 117.73 $ 84.37 $ 60.03 $ $ 143.03 Revised 8/3/22 APPENDIX B - FEE SCHEDULE 15 of 20 Revised 9-9-22 ATTACHMENT B 150 June 16, 2026 Item 6
APPENDIX B
COMPENSATION AND FEE SCHEDULE
TASK ANALYSIS
SUBCONSULTANT - HELIX
ODC Item Description UNIT UNIT COST QUANTITY TOTAL QUANTITY TOTAL QUANTITY TOTAL QUANTITY TOTAL 1 Repro & Graphics LS 500.00 $ 4 2,000.00 $ - $ - $ 4 2,000.00 $ 2 Deliveries LS 15.00 $ 6 90.00 $ - $ - $ 6 90.00 $
3 Mileage MI 0.625 $ 1000 625.00 $ - $ - $ 1000 625.00 $ 4 Scanning LS 1.00 $ - $ - $ - $ $ -
5 Other (Photo, etc.) LS 1.00 $ - $ - $ - $ $ -
6 Parking EA 12.00 $ 20 240.00 $ - $ - $ 20 240.00 $
7 Record Searches EA 600.00 $ 1 600.00 $ - $ - $ 1 600.00 $ 8 Native American Monitor EA 240.00 $ - $ - $ - $ $ -
Subtotal = 3,555.00 $ Subtotal = - $ Subtotal = - $ $ 3,555.00 TASK 14 TOTALS
Agency Permitting
Revised 8/3/22 APPENDIX B - FEE SCHEDULE 16 of 20
Revised 9-9-22
ATTACHMENT B 151 June 16, 2026 Item 6
APPENDIX B
COMPENSATION AND FEE SCHEDULE
TASK ANALYSIS
SUBCONSULTANT - CHANG
PROJECT TOTAL COST
MANAGER
ODCs Wayne
Chang
13.0 RIVER HYDRAULICS REPORT
13.1 RESPOND TO CALTRANS REVIEW COMMENTS ON DRAFT TSR
& PERFORM ADDITIONAL ANALYSES 48 48 8,160.00 $
13.2 FINAL RIVER HYDRAULICS REPORT 176 176 29,920.00 $
$ -
ODCs not specific to a Subtask (General) - $
SUBTOTAL 224 224 38,080.00 $
check
N/A 224 224
$ - $ 38,080.00 $ - $ 38,080.00
$ -
2022 Hourly Rate Schedule
PROJECT
MANAGER AVERAGE
$ 170.00 $ 170.00
Revised 8/3/22 APPENDIX B - FEE SCHEDULE 17 of 20
Revised 9-9-22
ATTACHMENT B 152 June 16, 2026 Item 6
APPENDIX B
COMPENSATION AND FEE SCHEDULE
TASK ANALYSIS
SUBCONSULTANT - TATSUMI
Sr. Sr. Sr. Tech Sr. Tech. Tech. Tech. Tech. TOTAL COST Principal Associate Staff Designer Staff III Staff III Staff II Staff II ODCs David Michael Sambath Jimmy Weywantheawy Kenton Alexa Miranda Guadalupe Tatsumi Aceves Ork Ogata Kang Quinn Flores Rodriguez
9.0 LANDSCAPE DESIGN
9.1 PLANTING DESIGN $ -
9.1.1 PLANTING & DEMO PLANS, DETAILS, AND NOTES 1 18 16 12 34 24 12 12 129 15,327.34 $
9.1.2 PLANTING & DEMO QUANTITIES AND SPECIFICATIONS 4 12 20 36 3,946.61 $
9.2 IRRIGATION DESIGN $ -
9.2.1 IRRIGATION & DEMO PLANS, DETAILS, AND NOTES 1 8 4 32 12 12 69 8,273.65 $
9.2.2 IRRIGATION & DEMO QUANTITIES AND SPECIFICATIONS 18 20 38 3,690.40 $
9.3 ARCHITECTUAL DESIGN $ -
9.3.1 BRIDGE AESTHETICS DESIGN AND DETAILS 16 12 16 16 46 106 11,763.17 $
9.3.2 HARDSCAPE PLANS, DETAILS, AN NOTES 1 12 18 16 24 71 8,466.45 $
9.3.3 HARDSCAPE QUANTITIES AND SPECIFICATIONS 4 8 12 24 2,623.77 $
9.3.4 ARCHITECTURAL VISUAL SIMULATIONS 8 12 42 62 6,383.05 $ $ -
ODCs not specific to a Subtask (General) 407.5 $ 407.50 SUBTOTAL 3 70 20 86 86 58 188 24 535 60,881.95 $
check
N/A 3 70 20 86 86 58 188 24 535
$ - $ 821.37 $ 11,821.96 $ 2,521.75 $ 10,843.53 $ 9,604.27 $ 6,226.56 $ 16,525.39 $ 2,109.62 $ 60,474.45 $ 407.50
2022 Hourly Rate Schedule
Sr. Sr. Sr. Tech Sr. Tech. Tech. Tech. Tech.
Principal Associate Staff Designer Staff III Staff III Staff II Staff II AVERAGE $ 168.89 273.79 $ 126.09 $ 126.09 $ 111.68 $ 107.35 $ 87.90 $ 87.90 $ $ 136.21 Revised 8/3/22 APPENDIX B - FEE SCHEDULE 18 of 20
Revised 9-9-22
ATTACHMENT B 153 June 16, 2026 Item 6
APPENDIX B
COMPENSATION AND FEE SCHEDULE
TASK ANALYSIS
SUBCONSULTANT - TATSUMI
ODC Item Description UNIT UNIT COST QUANTITY TOTAL QUANTITY TOTAL QUANTITY TOTAL QUANTITY TOTAL 1 Repro & Graphics SF 3.00 $ 35 105.00 $ 17.5 52.50 $ - $ 52.5 157.50 $ 2 Deliveries LS 15.00 $ - $ - $ - $ $ -
3 Mileage MI 0.625 $ 250 156.25 $ 150 93.75 $ - $ 400 250.00 $ 4 Scanning LS 1.00 $ - $ - $ - $ $ -
5 Other (Photo, etc.) LS 1.00 $ - $ - $ - $ $ -
6 Parking EA 12.00 $ - $ - $ - $ $ -
7 Record Searches EA 600.00 $ - $ - $ - $ $ -
Subtotal = 261.25 $ Subtotal = 146.25 $ Subtotal = - $ $ 407.50 TOTALS
Planting Plans Irrigation Plans
TASK 9.1 TASK 9.2 TASK 6
Revised 8/3/22 APPENDIX B - FEE SCHEDULE 19 of 20
Revised 9-9-22
ATTACHMENT B 154 June 16, 2026 Item 6
APPENDIX B
COMPENSATION AND FEE SCHEDULE
TASK ANALYSIS
SUBCONSULTANT - STC Traffic
PRINCIPAL PROJECT PROJECT ASSOCIATE TOTAL COST
IN CHARGE MANAGER ENGINEER ENGINEER
ODCs Jason Christian Joseph Gianluca
Stack Lambarth Walters Pesaresi
8.0 TRAFFIC DESIGN
8.1 FINAL TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN (TMP) 2 8 20 8 38 5,676.47 $
8.2 SIGNING AND STRIPING PLANS 2 20 40 100 162 20,489.58 $
8.3 SIGNING AND STRIPING SPECIAL PROVISIONS AND COST
ESTIMATE 1 4 16 8 29 4,094.83 $
8.4 TRAFFIC CONTROL DESIGN 1 8 30 30 69 9,112.67 $
8.5 TRAFFIC CONTROL SPECIAL PROVISIONS AND COST
ESTIMATE 1 2 8 4 15 2,199.77 $
ODCs not specific to a Subtask (General) - $
SUBTOTAL 7 42 114 150 313 41,573.32 $
313 41,573.32 $
check
N/A 7 42 114 150 313
$ - $ 2,133.01 $ 7,618.49 $ 15,713.79 $ 16,108.03 $ 41,573.32 $ -
2022 Hourly Rate Schedule
PRINCIPAL PROJECT PROJECT ASSOCIATE
IN CHARGE MANAGER ENGINEER ENGINEER AVERAGE
$ 181.39 304.72 $ 137.84 $ 107.39 $ $ 182.83
Revised 8/3/22 APPENDIX B - FEE SCHEDULE 20 of 20
Revised 9-9-22
ATTACHMENT B 155 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Work Stage C – PS&E and Permitting
Revised August 3, 2022
www.kleinfelder.com
EXHIBIT C
DRAFT SCHEDULE
Revised 3-17-22 Revised 9-9-22
ATTACHMENT B 156 June 16, 2026 Item 6
ID Task Name Duration Start Finish Predecessors
1 Camino PS&E 820 days Mon 5/1/23 Fri 6/19/26
2 Notice to Proceed (NTP) 0 days Mon 5/1/23 Mon 5/1/23
3 Mobilization 2 wks Mon 5/1/23 Fri 5/12/23 2
4 Kick Off Meeting 2 wks Mon 5/15/23 Fri 5/26/23 3
5 Management 820 days Mon 5/1/23 Fri 6/19/26 2
6 7 Bridge Design 800 days Mon 5/29/23 Fri 6/19/26
8 Type Selection Report 7 mons Mon 5/29/23 Fri 12/8/23 4 9 65% PS&E 7 mons Mon 4/29/24 Fri 11/8/24 8,23FF
10 Agency Review 1 mon Mon 11/11/24 Fri 12/6/24 9
11 Bridge IDC 5 mons Mon 11/11/24 Fri 3/28/25 9
12 90% PS&E 3 mons Mon 3/31/25 Fri 6/20/25 11
13 Agency Review 1 mon Mon 6/23/25 Fri 7/18/25 12
14 100% PS&E 3 mons Mon 7/21/25 Fri 10/10/25 13
15 Agency Review 1 mon Mon 10/13/25 Fri 11/7/25 14
16 Final (IFC) PS&E 2 mons Mon 11/10/25 Fri 1/2/26 15
17 Authorization for Construction 6 mons Mon 1/5/26 Fri 6/19/26 16,90 20 Geotechnical Design 500 days Mon 11/13/23 Fri 10/10/25 21 Pre-Field Preparation 3 mons Mon 11/13/23 Fri 2/2/24 8FS-1 mon 22 Field Investigation 2 mons Mon 5/27/24 Fri 7/19/24 33 23 Draft Reports 5 mons Mon 6/24/24 Fri 11/8/24 22FS-1 mon 24 Final Reports 3 mons Mon 7/21/25 Fri 10/10/25 14SS
27 River Hydraulics Design 620 days Mon 5/29/23 Fri 10/10/25 28 Draft-Final Report 9 mons Mon 5/29/23 Fri 2/2/24 8SS 29 Final Report 3 mons Mon 7/21/25 Fri 10/10/25 24SS
32 Agency Permitting 500 days Mon 12/11/23 Fri 11/7/25
33 Envr Permits for Geo 6 mons Mon 12/11/23 Fri 5/24/24 21SS+1 mon 34 Pre-Application Preparation 6 mons Mon 12/11/23 Fri 5/24/24 33SS 35 Pre-Application Meeting 0 days Fri 5/24/24 Fri 5/24/24 34 36 Section 404 Draft Application (USACE) 45 days Mon 5/27/24 Fri 7/26/24 35 37 Section 401 Draft Application (RWQCB) 45 days Mon 5/27/24 Fri 7/26/24 36SS 38 Section 1602 Draft Application (CDFW) 45 days Mon 5/27/24 Fri 7/26/24 37SS 39 Submit Permit App to Agencies 0 days Fri 7/26/24 Fri 7/26/24 38 40 Permit Processing 310 days Mon 7/29/24 Fri 10/3/25 39 41 Section 7 Consultation (USFWS/NOAA) 210 days Mon 9/23/24 Fri 7/11/25 40SS+2 mons 42 Section 106 Consult (Tribal & SHPO) 120 days Mon 9/23/24 Fri 3/7/25 41SS 43 NPDES Permit (RWQCB) 500 days Mon 12/11/23 Fri 11/7/25 34SS 44 Habitat Mit-Mon Plan (HM&MP) 500 days Mon 12/11/23 Fri 11/7/25 43SS 45 Permit App & Approval 12 mons Mon 11/11/24 Fri 10/10/25 9 46 Incorporate Reqs. into Plans 4 mons Mon 6/23/25 Fri 10/10/25 45FF Camino PS&E
5/1/23 Notice to Proceed (NTP)
Mobilization 5/12/23
Kick Off Meeting 5/26/23
Management 6/19/26
Bridge Design
5/29/23 Type Selection Report
65% PS&E 11/8/24
Agency Review 12/6/24
11/11/24 Bridge IDC
3/31/25 90% PS&E
Agency Review 7/18/25
7/21/25 100% PS&E
Agency Review 11/7/25
11/10/25 Final (IFC) PS&E
Authorization for Construction 6/19/26
Geotechnical Design Geotechnical Design
Pre-Field Preparation 2/2/24
Field Investigation 7/19/24
Draft Reports 11/8/24
Final Reports 10/10/25
River Hydraulics Design
Draft-Final Report 2/2/24
Final Report 10/10/25
Agency Permitting Agency Permitting
Envr Permits for Geo 5/24/24
Pre-Application Preparation 5/24/24
5/24/24
Section 404 Draft Application (USACE) 7/26/24
Section 401 Draft Application (RWQCB) 7/26/24
Section 1602 Draft Application (CDFW) 7/26/24
7/26/24
Permit Processing 10/3/25
Section 7 Consultation (USFWS/NOAA) 7/11/25
Section 106 Consult (Tribal & SHPO) 3/7/25
NPDES Permit (RWQCB) 11/7/25
Habitat Mit-Mon Plan (HM&MP) 11/7/25
Permit App & Approval 10/10/25
Incorporate Reqs. into Plans 10/10/25
O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S 2023 2024 2025 2026
Bridge No. 57C-0209 BRLS-5356(008) CAMINO DEL MAR - BRIDGE REPLACEMENT Work Stage C PS&E + Agency Permitting Updated: 3.17.23 Jim Frost 619-302-9275 Don Bloodworth 619.861.0337 Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 1 of 2 Appendix C - Full Lookahead Schedule ATTACHMENT B 157 June 16, 2026 Item 6
ID Task Name Duration Start Finish Predecessors
48 Civil Design 260 days Mon 12/11/23 Fri 12/6/24
49 Phase II ESA 6 mons Mon 12/11/23 Fri 5/24/24 8
50 Right of Way Req. Map 7 mons Mon 5/27/24 Fri 12/6/24 49 51 52 Surveying & ROW 400 days Mon 12/11/23 Fri 6/20/25 53 Design Surveys 6 mons Mon 12/11/23 Fri 5/24/24 8
54 Pothole Surveys 6 mons Mon 12/11/23 Fri 5/24/24 53SS 55 Plats & Legals for TCEs 7 mons Mon 12/9/24 Fri 6/20/25 50 56 Utility Coordination 260 days Mon 12/11/23 Fri 12/6/24 57 Utility Verification & Relocation 6 mons Mon 12/11/23 Fri 5/24/24 8 58 Final Utility Plans 7 mons Mon 5/27/24 Fri 12/6/24 57 59 On-Site Drainage Design 260 days Mon 12/11/23 Fri 12/6/24 60 Update On-Site Drainage Report 6 mons Mon 12/11/23 Fri 5/24/24 8 61 On-Site Drainage Design Plans 7 mons Mon 5/27/24 Fri 12/6/24 60 62 Water Quality Design 260 days Mon 12/11/23 Fri 12/6/24 63 Update Water Quality Report 6 mons Mon 12/11/23 Fri 5/24/24 8 64 Water Quality Design Plans 7 mons Mon 5/27/24 Fri 12/6/24 63 65 BMP Maintenance Plans 7 mons Mon 5/27/24 Fri 12/6/24 64SS 66 Erosion Control/SWPPP Design 260 days Mon 12/11/23 Fri 12/6/24 67 Erosion Control Plans 6 mons Mon 12/11/23 Fri 5/24/24 8 68 Prepare Draft SWPPP for Contractor 7 mons Mon 5/27/24 Fri 12/6/24 67 69 71 Traffic Design 260 days Mon 12/11/23 Fri 12/6/24
72 Final Traffic Management Plan (TMP) 6 mons Mon 12/11/23 Fri 5/24/24 8 73 Signing and Striping Plans 7 mons Mon 5/27/24 Fri 12/6/24 72 74 Traffic Control Plans 7 mons Mon 5/27/24 Fri 12/6/24 73SS 76 Landscape Design 260 days Mon 12/11/23 Fri 12/6/24
77 Concept Plans 6 mons Mon 12/11/23 Fri 5/24/24 8
78 Planting Design Plans 7 mons Mon 5/27/24 Fri 12/6/24 77 79 Irrigation Design Plans 7 mons Mon 5/27/24 Fri 12/6/24 78SS 80 Architectural Design Plans 7 mons Mon 5/27/24 Fri 12/6/24 79SS 81 82 Roadway Design 540 days Mon 12/11/23 Fri 1/2/26
83 Update GAD 6 mons Mon 12/11/23 Fri 5/24/24 8
84 Combined 65% PS&E 7 mons Mon 4/29/24 Fri 11/8/24 9SS 85 Agency Review 1 mon Mon 11/11/24 Fri 12/6/24 84
86 Combined 90% PS&E 7 mons Mon 12/9/24 Fri 6/20/25 85
87 Agency Review 1 mon Mon 6/23/25 Fri 7/18/25 86
88 Combined 100% PS&E 3 mons Mon 7/21/25 Fri 10/10/25 87 89 Agency Review 1 mon Mon 10/13/25 Fri 11/7/25 88
90 Combined Final (IFC) PS&E 2 mons Mon 11/10/25 Fri 1/2/26 89 Civil Design Civil Design
Phase II ESA 5/24/24
Right of Way Req. Map 12/6/24
Surveying & ROW Surveying & ROW
Design Surveys 5/24/24
Pothole Surveys 5/24/24
Plats & Legals for TCEs 6/20/25
Utility Coordination Utility Coordination
Utility Verification & Relocation 5/24/24
Final Utility Plans 12/6/24
On-Site Drainage Design On-Site Drainage Design
Update On-Site Drainage Report 5/24/24
On-Site Drainage Design Plans 12/6/24
Water Quality Design Water Quality Design
Update Water Quality Report 5/24/24
Water Quality Design Plans 12/6/24
BMP Maintenance Plans 12/6/24
Erosion Control/SWPPP Design Erosion Control/SWPPP Design Erosion Control Plans 5/24/24
Prepare Draft SWPPP for Contractor 12/6/24
Traffic Design Traffic Design
Final Traffic Management Plan (TMP) 5/24/24
Signing and Striping Plans 12/6/24
Traffic Control Plans 12/6/24
Landscape Design Landscape Design
Concept Plans 5/24/24
Planting Design Plans 12/6/24
Irrigation Design Plans 12/6/24
Architectural Design Plans 12/6/24
Roadway Design
Update GAD 5/24/24
4/29/24 Combined 65% PS&E
Agency Review 12/6/24
12/9/24 Combined 90% PS&E
Agency Review 7/18/25
7/21/25 Combined 100% PS&E
Agency Review 11/7/25
Combined Final (IFC) PS&E 1/2/26
O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S 2023 2024 2025 2026
Bridge No. 57C-0209 BRLS-5356(008) CAMINO DEL MAR - BRIDGE REPLACEMENT Work Stage C PS&E + Agency Permitting Updated: 3.17.23 Jim Frost 619-302-9275 Don Bloodworth 619.861.0337 Kleinfelder, Inc. Page 2 of 2 Appendix C - Full Lookahead Schedule ATTACHMENT B 158 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Camino Del Mar Work Stage C – PS&E and Permitting
June 28, 2022
www.kleinfelder.com
EXHIBIT D
ORGANIZATION CHART
ATTACHMENT B 159 June 16, 2026 Item 6
Appendix D - Camino Del Mar PS&E - Organization Chart
REPLACEMENT OF CAMINO DEL MAR BRIDGE
OVER SAN DIEGUITO RIVER (BR. NO. 57C-0209)
Jim Frost, PE
Principal-in-Charge / Project Manager
[email protected]
619-302-9275
Eric Buckwalter, PE
Project Manager Assistant
[email protected]
619-861-4600
Don Bloodworth, PE, PLS, QSD
Engineer of Record / Civil Lead
[email protected]
619-861-0337
KLEINFELDER
Pratima Gatehouse
QA/QC
[email protected]
619-831-4600
KLEINFELDER
Jason Stack, PE, TE
Lead Traffic Engineer
[email protected]
714-315-4640
STC TRAFFIC
Traffic Engineering
Wayne Chang, PE
Hydraulic Engineer
[email protected]
858-692-0760
CHANG CONSULTANTS
River Hydraulics
Raymond Escobar, PE, QSD
Drainage Engineer
[email protected]
858-345-1278
SAN DIEGUITO ENGINEERING
Street Hydraulics / WQ
Colby Cushing, PE
Lead Bridge Engineer
[email protected]
619-307-0838
Sami Megally, PE, PhD
Seismic Specialist
[email protected]
619-831-4600
KLEINFELDER
Bridge Design
Vanessa Toscano
Lead Environmental Planner
[email protected]
619-462-1515
HELIX ENVIRONMENTAL
Environmental Lead
Joshua Reeves, PE
Civil Engineer
[email protected]
858.345.1160
SAN DIEGUITO ENGINEERING
Civil Engineering
Janna Bonfiglio, PE
Lead Geotechnical Engineer
[email protected]
619-831-4569
KLEINFELDER
Geotechnical
Michael Aceves
Architectural Engineer
[email protected]
949-453-9901
TATSUMI AND PARTNERS
Architectural Engineering
TIM THIELE
Project Manager
[email protected]
760-603-6243
JOE BRIDE
Director of Public Works
DBE
GOAL 9%
DBE DBE DBE
3.17.23 ATTACHMENT B 160 June 16, 2026 Item 6
SEVENTH AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DEL MAR AND KLEINFELDER, INC.
THIS SEVENTH AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT (the “Seventh Amendment”) is made and entered into effective this 18th day of November, 2024, by and between the CITY OF DEL MAR, a California municipal corporation and Charter City (“CITY”) and KLEINFELDER, INC., a California Corporation (“CONSULTANT”) (collectively “Parties”).
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the Camino Del Mar Bridge over the San Dieguito River is structurally deficient and seismically and flood vulnerable. Replacement of the Camino Del Mar Bridge (Project) qualified for the Caltrans Eligible Bridge List in 2012, and is therefore, eligible for 88.53% reimbursement from the Federal Highway Bridge Program with Caltrans oversight/approval; and
WHEREAS, on May 23, 2017, the City and Consultant entered into an Agreement for Preliminary Engineering and Environmental Documentation Services for the Project (“Agreement”); and
WHEREAS, on March 5, 2018, the Parties entered into a First Amendment to the Agreement in which the federal fiscal contract provisions were added to the Agreement in order to comply with the Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM); and WHEREAS, on April 1, 2019, the Parties entered into a Second Amendment to the Agreement with Consultant to extend the term of the Agreement and modify the scope of work and the total Agreement amount; and
WHEREAS, on July 12, 2021, the Parties entered into a Third Amendment to the Agreement with Consultant to extend the term of the Agreement for a one-year period through June 30, 2022, and modify the scope of work and the total Agreement amount; and
WHEREAS, on July 1, 2022, the Parties entered into a Fourth Amendment to the Agreement with Consultant to extend the term of the Agreement for a one-year period through June 30, 2023; and
WHEREAS, on October 3, 2022, the Parties entered into a Fifth Amendment to the Agreement with Consultant to modify the scope of work; and WHEREAS, on April 3, 2023, the Parties entered into a Sixth Amendment to the Agreement with Consultant to extend the term of the Agreement for an additional threeyear period; expand the scope of work to include finalizing the draft Type Selection Report (dTSR), completing final design, and preparing the project for bid; and increase the notto-exceed amount to cover the additional required scope of work.
ATTACHMENT B 161 June 16, 2026 Item 6
City of Del Mar
Seventh Amendment to Agreement with Kleinfelder, Inc.