Agenda packet — Dublin City Council, August 20, 2024 (part 2 of 6)

the project area includes: 1) the East Dublin General Plan and Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (1993), 2) the East Dublin Properties Stage 1 Development Plan and Annexation Supplemental EIR (2002), and 3) the Fallon Village Supplemental EIR (2005). Collectively, these three environmental review documents are referred to as the “EDSP EIRs.” Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines and using the City’s Initial Study Checklist, the City assessed whether any further environmental review is required for the proposed project and determined that an Addendum to the EDSP EIRs is the appropriate CEQA review. The Addendum is included as Attachment 10.

The General Commercial/Campus Office land use designation includes a FAR range of 0.20 to 0.80.

The previous environmental documents studied the potential impacts of development at an intensity of 0.28 FAR. An updated CEQA analysis was conducted with this project to include analysis of the potential impacts of development at an intensity of 0.6 FAR. The analysis found the

0.6 FAR to be consistent with the anticipated impacts (e.g., traffic and air emissions) in the previous EDSP EIRs.

PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW:

The Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 11, 2024. Five individuals provided public comment, two individuals in support of the project and three individuals against the project. In addition, the Planning Commission received five written comments (Attachment 11). The Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 24-05 unanimously recommending the City Council approve the project (Attachment 12). The Planning Commission also recommended the City Council consider removing the Contemporary architectural style from the Planned Development Residential Guidelines because they felt it was not consistent with the surrounding development.

The City and the City’s CEQA and Traffic consultants prepared responses to the CEQA and trafficrelated comments received from the two primary written comment letters, which is included as Attachment 13. Additionally, the applicant elected to also provide a response to the comment letters, which is included as Attachment 14.

PUBLIC OUTREACH:

Three City-led Community Meetings were held on March 27, March 28, and April 3, 2024, to provide Dublin residents with information about the proposed Dublin Fallon 580 Project. In addition to Staff and the Applicant, nine residents attended the meeting on March 27; 33 residents attended on March 28; and eight residents attended on April 3. Staff provided a presentation that included an overview of the City’s development review process and the proposed project.

Questions were asked about affordable housing, traffic impacts, rodent control, off-site wetland mitigation, views, use of union labor, and the proposed Nature Community Park.

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

Strategy 1: Economic Development, Small Business Support, and Downtown Dublin Strategic Objective 1C: Continue supporting the Fallon-East Economic Development Zone and associated agreements that effectuate the construction of the Dublin Blvd. Extension. 147

Page 14 of 14 ends

NOTICING REQUIREMENTS:

In accordance with State law, a Public Notice was mailed to all property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the subject property. A Public Notice was also published in the East Bay Times and posted at several locations throughout the City. To date, the City has received some written comment on the project for this City Council hearing (Attachment 15). A Planning Application sign was posted on the project site and the project was also included on the City’s Development Projects webpage. A copy of this Staff Report was posted on the City’s website and provided to the Applicant.

ATTACHMENTS:
1) Adopting an Addendum to the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Environmental Impact Reports and Adopting General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendments to Eliminate the

2.5-Acre Public/Semi-Public Land Use Designation and to Convert Approximately 42.6 Acres of Open Space to the Parks/Public Recreation Land Use Designation 2) Ordinance Amending the Zoning Map and Approving Amendments to the Planned Development Zoning Stage 1 Development Plan Ordinance No. 32-05 and a Stage 2 Development Plan for 13.7-Acres of Medium-High Density Residential for the Dublin Fallon 580 Project
3) Exhibit A to the Ordinance - Architectural Design Guidelines 4) Exhibit B to the Ordinance - Landscape Design Guidelines 5) Resolution Approving the Vesting Tentative Maps for the Dublin Fallon 580 Project 6) Exhibit A to the Resolution - Vesting Tentative Tract Maps 7) Ordinance Approving a Development Agreement Between the City of Dublin and GH PacVest, LLC Related to the Dublin Fallon 580 Project
8) Exhibit A to the Ordinance - Development Agreement
9) Local Transportation Analysis
10) CEQA Analysis in Support of the Addendum to the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan EIR 11) Planning Commission Public Comment Letters Received 12) Planning Commission Resolution No. 24-05
13) City response to CEQA and Traffic Impact Analysis comments 14) GH PacVest response to the CEQA and Traffic Impact Analysis comments 15) City Council Public Comment Letters
148

STAFF REPORT

CITY COUNCIL

Page 1 of 2 ends

Agenda Item 5.5
DATE: August 20, 2024
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Linda Smith, City Manager
SUBJECT: Tri-Valley Haven Shelter Rebuild and Expansion Project Prepared by: Shaun Chilkotowsky, Parks & Community Services Manager EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The City Council will consider allocating $278,289 in available grant funds from the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Urban County Capital Project Pool to rebuild the Tri-Valley Haven Domestic Violence and Homeless Shelter. The project will include expanding the shelter from 30 to 45 beds.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt the Resolution Approving the Allocation of CDBG Funding for the Tri-Valley Haven Shelter Rebuild and Expansion Project.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

The $278,289 grant is funded by the CDBG Capital Project Pool administered by Alameda County Housing and Community Development Department on behalf of Urban County cities, including Dublin.

DESCRIPTION:

Background
Tri-Valley Haven’s domestic violence and homeless shelter has operated in the Tri-Valley region for over 40 years. The shelter is the only confidential domestic violence shelter in the region and the only one that offers shelter to families with teenage boys. In recent years, Tri-Valley Haven has turned families away because the shelter is at capacity. In 2022, maintenance issues resulted in Tri-Valley Haven reducing capacity by 14 beds, so they rented a home temporarily to maintain a 30-bed capacity. Tri-Valley Haven has prioritized a capital campaign to ensure shelter operations continue to meet the needs of residents of the Tri-Valley.

Project Proposal
The shelter rebuild project will include the full demolition of the existing shelter and a complete 149

Page 2 of 2 ends

rebuilding of the current site. The project will also increase the shelter's capacity from 30 to 45 beds in one single-story building. As of July 2024, the total project cost is estimated at $9.2 million, with $8.2 million in funding secured by Tri-Valley Haven. The secured funding includes $240,205 from the Fiscal Year 2023-24 CDBG Urban County Capital Project Pool that the City Council approved in September 2023. The total contribution from the City of Dublin, utilizing CDBG Urban County Capital Project Pool funding, would be $518,494 should the additional $278,289 be awarded. Additional funding sources include Alameda County, the City of Livermore, the City of Pleasanton, Measure A, and various private entities.

Alameda County Urban County CDBG Program
The City of Dublin participates in Alameda County’s Urban-County CDBG Program, along with the cities of Albany, Emeryville, Newark, and Piedmont, which are known as the “Urban County Cities,” along with the unincorporated areas of Alameda County.

Each year, Alameda County has an estimated $330,000 available in the Capital Project Pool accessible to Urban County Cities. Following receipt of Tri-Valley Haven’s request for grant funding, Dublin Staff submitted a request to Alameda County on July 1, 2024 for Fiscal Year 2024- 25 CDBG capital funding. The Alameda County Urban County Technical Advisory Committee approved the request at its July 16, 2024 meeting.

The funding request will be incorporated into the annual agreement between the City of Dublin and Alameda County, covering all Human Service CDBG programs and projects. The Fiscal Year 2024-25 agreement is scheduled for approval by the Alameda County Board of Supervisors in September 2024.

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

None.

NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:

The City Council Agenda was posted, and Tri-Valley Haven was provided a web-link to the Staff Report.

ATTACHMENTS:
1) Resolution Approving the Allocation of CDBG Funding for the Tri-Valley Haven Shelter Rebuild and Expansion Project
150
Attachment 1
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted 08/20/24 Page 1 of 2 RESOLUTION NO. XX - 24

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN

APPROVING THE ALLOCATION OF CDBG FUNDING FOR THE TRI-VALLEY HAVEN

SHELTER REBUILD AND EXPANSION PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City of Dublin received a Human Services Program grant request from Tri-Valley Haven for $278,289 in CDBG Capital Funding for the rebuild and expansion of its Domestic Violence and Homeless Shelter; and
WHEREAS, on July 16, 2024, the Alameda County Urban County Technical Advisory Committee approved the City of Dublin’s request for CDBG Capital Funds to support the project; and
WHEREAS, the CDBG Capital Funding will be incorporated into the City of Dublin and Alameda County Fiscal Year 2024-25 Agreement that incorporates all CDBG funded programs and projects.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby take the following actions:

1. Approve $278,289 in CDBG Capital Funding for the Tri-Valley Haven Shelter Rebuild and Expansion Project; and

2. Direct Staff to work with the County of Alameda as required on the CDBG funding guidelines; and

3. Authorize the City Manager to execute agreements with the County of Alameda for use of CDBG funds and the funding agreement with Tri-Valley Haven and take such further actions as may be necessary or appropriate to carry out the City Council’s obligations pursuant to this Resolution.
{Signatures on the following page}
151
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted 08/20/24 Page 2 of 2 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of August 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
______________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________
City Clerk
152

STAFF REPORT

CITY COUNCIL

Page 1 of 3 ends

Agenda Item 5.6
DATE: August 20, 2024
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Linda Smith, City Manager
SUBJECT: Camp Parks Sign and Guard Shack Rehabilitation and Relocation Project CIP No. PA0121 – Determination of Non-Responsive Bid
Prepared by: Shaun Chilkotowsky, Parks & Community Services Manager EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The City Council will consider determining that no responsive bids were received, in accordance with the Public Contract Code, for the Camp Parks Sign and Guard Shack Rehabilitation and Relocation Project, CIP No. PA0121. Accordingly, per the Public Contract Code and without the need for additional competitive bidding, Staff will negotiate a suitable contract for the Project and seek City Council approval at a future meeting.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt the Resolution Determining No Responsive Bids Were Received for the Camp Parks Sign and Guard Shack Project, CIP No. PA0121, and authorize Staff to negotiate a suitable contract for the project in accordance with Public Contract Code Sections 20166.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

As approved in the 2024-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP), the total budget for the Camp Parks Sign Project is $500,450, funded by the Public Art Fund. There is no financial impact associated with rejecting a non-responsive bid for construction of the Project.

DESCRIPTION:

The 2024-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) includes the Camp Parks Sign and Guard Shack Rehabilitation and Relocation Project (formally known as the Camp Parks Sign Project), CIP No. PA0121 (Attachment 2). In March 2022, the City Council approved a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) memorializing the collaboration between the City of Dublin and Parks Reserve Forces Training Area (PRFTA)/Fort Hunter Liggett (FHL) regarding the project. The MOA provides for the City to fund the design and construction of the project and for PRFTA/FHL to continue to own and maintain the sign as it is located on federal land. The MOA also includes 153

Page 2 of 3 ends

language to ensure public access to the sign for a period of 10 years.

Sign and Guard Shack Background
Camp Parks was first established as a military base in World War II. The area was unofficially known as “Fleet City” and included Camp Parks (1942-46), a training and deployment center for the United States Navy’s Construction Battalions (“Seabees”); Camp Shoemaker (1943-46), a Navy personnel distribution and separation center; and Shoemaker Naval Hospital (1943-46), one of several Navy installations around the country where women were accepted as enlisted personnel and as officers.

In 1944, as a U.S. Navy Seabee ordered to Camp Parks during World War II, Bruce Goff designed the Camp Parks entrance sign and attached guard shack. The current physical location of the sign and guard shack is at the original entrance to Camp Parks, which is now closed, although the sign can be seen when traveling along Dougherty Road just north of Scarlett Drive.

In 1998, the U.S. Army evaluated the Camp Parks entrance sign and determined it eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. In 1999, the State Historic Preservation Officer, Office of Historic Preservation, concurred with this assessment. Also in the late 1990s, PRFTA and FHL began investigating restoring the sign and guard shack. That work included environmental reviews, hazardous material sampling, and historical and cultural resource impact evaluation. The new location for the sign is adjacent to the new PRFTA entrance at Dougherty Road and Camp Parks Boulevard, just outside the Dublin Camp Parks Military History Center.

Since approximately April 2022, the City of Dublin has been working collaboratively with PRFTA Staff and a historical architecture firm to develop plans and specifications for the project. In May 2024, final plans and specifications were completed, and the project was put out to bid.

Bid Process and Results
The City of Dublin issued a bid package for the Camp Parks Sign and Guard Shack Rehabilitation and Relocation Project on May 1, 2024. The bid package consisted of one base bid item and one bid alternate item. The project was posted through all traditional channels, including local newspapers, the City of Dublin Online Planroom, local builders’ exchanges, the City website, and direct contact from City Staff to local contractors. Two mandatory pre-bid meetings were held, the first on May 16, 2024, with one contractor attending, and the second on May 29, 2024, with two contractors attending.

On June 13, 2024, the City of Dublin held the public bid opening, receiving one bid from La Roza Construction, Inc., for a base bid amount of $403,485 and no bid for the bid alternate item. A review of La Roza Construction, Inc.’s bid package identified that items were missing and there were issues with compliance. This includes not affixing the corporate seal to the bid proposal, failing to properly complete the subcontractor form in the bid documents issued for the project, and failing to fully complete the bid form issued for the project by not including pricing for the bid alternate item. Staff believes these omissions result in a non-responsive bid by La Roza Construction, Inc.

Additionally, La Roza Construction, Inc. indicated in the statement of Bidder Qualifications that 154

Page 3 of 3 ends

they had not completed the minimum number of projects required in the project bid documents.

Specifically, the Notice Inviting Bids and Bidder’s Questionnaire stipulated that bid proposals submitted by general contractors who have not completed two qualifying projects within the past seven years shall be deemed non-responsive and therefore rejected. In response to a question in the Bidder Qualification Section, Section C-1, La Roza Construction, Inc. indicated that they have not completed two qualifying projects within the past seven years.

In deeming the bid non-responsive, the City will have received no bids for the project, and the City may have the project done without further compliance with the Public Contract Code.

Next Steps
If authorized by the City Council, the City Manager or designee will proceed with soliciting capable contractors and negotiating a proposal for project construction. Staff anticipates being able to negotiate pricing, schedule, and contract terms with a qualified contractor and returning to City Council for project award in the coming months.

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

None.

NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:

The City Council Agenda was posted.

ATTACHMENTS:
1) Resolution Determining No Responsive Bids Were Received for the Camp Parks Sign and Guard Shack Project, CIP No. PA0121
2) CIP No. PA0121
155
Attachment 1
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted 08/20/2024 Page 1 of 1 RESOLUTION NO. XX – 24

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN

DETERMINING NO RESPONSIVE BIDS WERE RECEIVED FOR THE CAMP PARKS SIGN AND GUARD SHACK PROJECT, CIP NO. PA0121
WHEREAS, Staff prepared plans, specifications, and bid documents for the Camp Parks Sign Project, PA01221; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Dublin Municipal Code, California Public Contract Code, and other applicable laws, City Staff solicited bids for the Project; and WHEREAS, on June 13, 2024, one bid was received from La Roza Construction Inc., and publicly opened in accordance with applicable law; and WHEREAS, during review of the bid package from La Roza Construction Inc., the bid was deemed non-responsive.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby determine no responsive bids were received for the Camp Parks Sign Project, CIP No.

PA0121, and in accordance with the Public Contract Code, without the need for additional competitive bidding, authorize Staff to negotiate a suitable contract for the Project and seek City Council approval at a future meeting.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of August 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
______________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________
City Clerk
156
Public Art Five-Year Capital Improvement Program 2024-2029 40 Number – PA0121 CAMP PARKS SIGN Program – PUBLIC ART

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This project includes the restoration and relocation of the historic Camp Parks entrance sign from its current location at approximately 201 Dougherty Road to the new entrance at Camp Parks Boulevard and Dougherty Road. The original sign was constructed by artist/architect Bruce Goff in the 1940s and is eligible for the National Register. Rehabilitation will be in accordance with standards and guidelines per the U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service.

PROJECT TIMELINE: The design process began in winter 2022. Construction will begin in 2024.

ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT: None. Ongoing maintenance will be provided by Camp Parks. 2024-2029 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

ESTIMATED COSTS
PRIOR
YEARS 2024-2025 2025-2026 2026-2027 2027-2028 2028-2029 FUTURE

YEARS TOTALS
9100 – Salaries & Benefits $24,450 $25,450
9200 – Contract Services $165,00 $165,000
9400 – Improvements $300,000 $300,000
9500 – Miscellaneous $10,000 $10,000
TOTAL $500,450 $500,450

FUNDING SOURCE
PRIOR
YEARS 2024-2025 2025-2026 2026-2027 2027-2028 2028-2029 FUTURE

YEARS TOTALS
2801 – Public Art Fund $500,450 $500,450
TOTAL $500,450 $500,450
Attachment 2
157

STAFF REPORT

CITY COUNCIL

Page 1 of 2 ends

Agenda Item 5.7
DATE: August 20, 2024
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Linda Smith, City Manager
SUBJECT: Tract 8647 Francis Ranch – Final Map Notice and Agreement for Long Term Encroachment for Landscape Features
Prepared by: Laurie Sucgang, City Engineer
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The City Council will receive a notification of the City Engineer’s pending approval of the Final Map for Tract 8647, Francis Ranch. The City Council will consider approving the Agreement for Long Term Encroachment for Landscape Features for Tract 8647, Francis Ranch.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Receive the notification and adopt the Resolution Approving the Agreement for Long Term Encroachment for Landscape Features with Tract 8647, Francis Ranch.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

There is no impact to the General Fund. All costs associated with the agreements are borne by the developer.

DESCRIPTION:

The Francis Ranch development (formerly known as East Ranch) is located north of Interstate 580, east of Fallon Road and the Jordan Ranch development, south of the Positano development, and adjacent to the City’s eastern city boundary. The development is being subdivided into six neighborhoods. The developer has prepared a final map, Tract 8647, for Neighborhood 3. In accordance with Chapter 9.24.080 of the City of Dublin Municipal Code, this is notice of the following:

City Engineer’s pending decision on the following Final Maps:
158

Page 2 of 2 ends

Tract Location Developer Number of
Units/Lots
Type Proposed
Decision
8647 Francis Ranch,
Neighborhood 3
TH East Ranch
Dublin, LLC
91 Lots Single-Family Approve
Agreement for Long Term Encroachment for Landscape Features The Agreement for Long Term Encroachment for Landscape Features provides for the Homeowners’ Association to maintain project-related landscape and decorative features within the public street rights-of-way along all public streets within the neighborhoods, including landscape plantings, irrigation, sidewalks, street trees, and decorative or stamped pavement. The project conditions of approval require these agreements prior to approval of the final map.

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

None.

NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:

The City Council Agenda was posted.

ATTACHMENTS:
1) Resolution Approving the Agreement for Long Term Encroachment for Landscape Features with Tract 8647, Francis Ranch
2) Exhibit A to the Resolution – Agreement for Long Term Encroachment for Landscape Features with Tract 8647, Francis Ranch
3) Tract 8647 Final Map
159
Attachment 1
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted 08/20/24 Page 1 of 1 RESOLUTION NO. XX – 24

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN

APPROVING THE AGREEMENT FOR LONG TERM ENCROACHMENT FOR LANDSCAPE FEATURES WITH TRACT 8647, FRANCIS RANCH
WHEREAS, a Vesting Tentative Map for Tract 8563, Francis Ranch was approved by City Council Resolution No. 140-21 on December 7, 2021, with Conditions of Approval; and WHEREAS, said Conditions of Approval required the developer to construct project-related landscape features within the public street rights-of-way; and WHEREAS, said Conditions of Approval required the developer to enter into an Agreement for Long Term Encroachment for the maintenance of said landscape features; and WHEREAS, the developer has executed and filed with the City of Dublin a Tract Improvement Agreement to construct the required Tract improvements, including said landscape features; and
WHEREAS, the developer has executed and filed with the City of Dublin an Agreement for Long Term Encroachment for Landscape Features for Tract 8647, Francis Ranch, attached hereto as Exhibit A, which will be recorded against the property concurrently with the Tract 8647 Final Map.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby approve the Agreement for Long Term Encroachment for Landscape Features for Tract 8647, Francis Ranch, attached hereto as Exhibit A to this Resolution.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager, or designee, is authorized to execute Exhibit A and make any necessary, non-substantive changes to Exhibit A to carry out the intent of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of August 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
______________________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________________
City Clerk
160

! "#
$%&'()*
$%&+,-.'$/
011$2$34'565
-.'$/789:;<=
>??@ABC?DE?FGHIJKLK
8MNOOPO
N

MONPO
N8QPO

N
8 R84OO8NORSQN8=<:T7
)5/3$UN5/3V
#WXYZ[\\ \]#^_`_][#\ \]a_ZaW \]#^_`Z]bYaZc\ ^\Z#d\Y
X#W#Za#efghijZ
k
lm k!no
a pb
n"
ija lm

!
q!
#W\!!
b
n"
``aq!a!" p
!" k " !n " kr!
i
ja
!lmq!
Za!rXstuq``aq!b"!o!" k " !n " kr! ij_o
lmq

!
v
0w4)+x()%&y#
nzrr #!efgh!p "
{||||p !r!
c!
|||||||||q
_pp !"pa
pZ"!k!qY!p
a!" p
!ijcrlmv
}w ~/()y_o
o
p#!efghq^!
!
ijczlmv
w+/%)53%+)y_o
!
!o a
!

!

p!

!
"! krk

o s

#
! !r
!
Xkrk
c"!
p^!
!
#!efghq
"

`!
!r
^!
i!p
n"omv
:w
5/U35x((5%-)(Uy_o
a
!q!r!pczq!
r!

pcz"!"!
!rp!
o
a
po!

p""o

o
#!efgh
rZ

qb"!q

!q[!""!
`!
q!
!
!
!qi"" "qj`!
!r
^!
lmva

! "p`!
!r^!
!o

p""o

r"!

5w
EFC?
?AF>FABAFALJ?BFDKrr! n !!Ykrq!rrna \

|||||||||!

.wAAFALJ?BFDKFDB ?ADAE?
Arr!n[!Z !!rrna \

|||||||||!

¡¢£¤¥¦§¨§©ª«¡¬ª ®¯°±¯±±±²³´µ¯ ³¶´·µ³¸¸·¹³ ¨º·¶ » ¸·¹¨ ¼½½¾¿ÀÁÂÃ½Ä 161

!"!

!!"

%&'()*+,)-./(01/*.203$! !! !"

!!4

!!

#

5

!

!!
!

6& 78(/*9-2:3!!!!
!#

!4
!

;& 7:/*,02+(9,(<=,2(0/(,()/3$! !!

!!

#

!
!!

! !

!

!

!
!

$!
!!
!

!
"
#

"
$!
?@

?
$

"
"
!

!
"

!

!

!!
!

"
$!
?
@
?
$

"
"

"
!!

!! !

!

!

"

A&B/.+C,D+*B/D+),02+(35

"
!

"
"
!"!

#

!

E
"

5 "

#

!

"

!!

"
!

!
"

F&G(9H*,()/3$! !!

!
"
!

!

"

!

!!
!!IJK
LLL
LLLM

#

NOPQRSTUVUWXYOZX[N\]^_]___`abc]NadbecaffegaNVhedNiNfegV 162

#$
#!

#
!

"&
"
'

#!
%(
&##
$
#!!

&)'&
' *
&&

'!#

#!"

&#!

% #
%
%
&"%
%
%
&*
)
&

)&#

%)# +&
#)&#

"

#

&#

#,

&-#))
&)
'!#
%
%
&"%
%
%
&
*
)
&

)&# #$
#!"
#%
#"&
#&#!.

/ 0
1,

&-#)

#
%#)#

####
#

#
2%
#(
#

#)
#!

)#

###
3#!.

45
67899
6-*

%#&#

#&
#)&#

##

#,

&-#)":*

!
%

! #

%#"

'
%#

#
2%
###;*
+
2&
#

1&#<=>?#)&&

## :*
@

%
$
#&#A*
#&###

#3B&#C

"*"##

)&
%

# #
%#

'
%#

)

#
2%
#
&&)*
#)#
*
##

#
&##$
#!

*
##
'!#
$
#!D
%"*
&
#')

'!*
#
"&

!
.1$
#!D
%&

!
%

#*
#

#
@EFA
! #:*
+
#
&# "

&!
&)
#

##$
#!D
%#
'#$
#!D
%#
#
%

#.

GHI

9909899
69J&
&##K$
#!L

#
2%
#'

# #

&)
#$
#!

)&&

%
$
#!.2

&##K:*
L

#
2%
#'

# #

&)

!)&&

#
#.

92
!
#
&"O)#"

#&)

&#

O)

##
#'%

)

#
2%
#'

*
#

)!%

#
#

!

!#
##!#*
#
&
#'%

@

%
%&%

!&)

&A")

!
%

'!&#

&
@
A

#&

! #

%"

###!#*
#
&
#'
%

"'!
#Q&
"#%

$
#!R
$
#! )'

EFF$

&3P
)'

S>T=<
-(U.@SVTA<Q==TE
2##
R$
#!D
%
WXYZ[\]^_^`abXcadWefghfhhhijklfWjmknljoonpjW_qnmWrWonp_ 163

!
"#

!$

%
&'()(

*

+!(,
-
./0&/

12"3* 4

5
"5%
3$!6
%

,,& 34
%&,,
+*

.('

63
1
!3

+
3"38%
/,,9+&/4:

-
./0&

;<=>?@ABACDE
F4
3 4

43
5

43
4
!544
3
4!

43
5%

;G=HIJCAIKLMNIKAOACPE

-3

43
534

#!3

!

4

4

534
!!

34

-

435
3!
3!
4-

!

-3
-

-3
4
3
3

F34

4-

!

-3
%

;Q=>MCAJRSTJRRURMCE143
5
345

!
3
5
4343
43!
# 4

5F !

4
4
34
%

;V=WXYMCRJZIJCDE143
5

F !

!3
4
4 434
!
33

5
3! 4

!36
5434
3!

433!%

[\]^_`abcbdef\geh[ijkljlllmnopj[nqorpnssrtn[curq[v[srtc 164

!"#
$
%&' ( )*(
+)
+
'
"
,

-'.+

/012/1

3453$
!"#
$##

*
+' * % * 6 *
(
%)'

"
,

$%,

/7081

355

39 :;<##

*=+* % * 6 *
(
%)'

"
,3++

)
:;##

*=+* % * 6 *
(
%)'

*%%6+

"
,3++

) *
:##

*=+* % * 6 *
(
%)'

*%%6+

"
,

$%,

>?@ABCDEFEGHI?JHK>LMNOMOOOPQRSM>QTRUSQVVUWQ>FXUT>Y>VUWF Z[\\][^_]`a[b[cc[
defdgfhijklkmnonpq
n][rst[uc
vacw`]sx[tvy[uc
defdgfhijzdli{vonpq
q`u^_`r`|r}s
165

166

167
FALLON
DUBLIN

ALAMEDA COUNTY CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
ROAD
N. CANYONS

PARKWAY

COLLIER

CANYON DOOLAN
ROAD
I-580 PROJECT SITE ARNOLD DRIVESCARLETT DRIVE
VICINITY MAP HOPYARD ROAD DOUGHERTY ROAD SAN RAMON VALLEY I-680 BLVD. ROAD GLEASON

DRIVE TASSAJARA ROAD
PLEASANTON DRIVE HACIENDA SANTA RITA I-580 ROAD
DUBLIN

BOULEVARD

CENTRAL

PARKWAY EL CHARRO ROAD FALLON
DUBLIN

ALAMEDA COUNTY CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
ROAD
N. CANYONS

PARKWAY

COLLIER

CANYON DOOLAN
ROAD
I-580 PROJECT SITE ARNOLD DRIVESCARLETT DRIVE
OWNER'S STATEMENT:

THE UNDERSIGNED DOES HEREBY STATE THAT HE/SHE/THEY IS/ARE THE OWNER OF ALL THE LANDS DELINEATED AND EMBRACED WITHIN THE TRACT BOUNDARY LINE OF THIS FINAL MAP ENTITLED: "TRACT 8647, FRANCIS RANCH, NEIGHBORHOOD 3, CROAK PROPERTY", CITY OF DUBLIN, ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA”, CONSISTING OF SEVEN (7) SHEETS, THIS STATEMENT BEING UPON SHEET ONE (1) THEREOF; THAT HE/SHE/THEY CONSENT(S) TO THE PREPARATION AND FILING OF SAID MAP; THAT SAID MAP DOES PARTICULARLY SETS FORTH AND DESCRIBES ALL THE LOTS INTENDED FOR SALE BY THEIR NUMBER AND PRECISE LENGTH AND WIDTH; AND THAT SAID MAP PARTICULARLY

SETS FORTH AND DESCRIBES THE PARCELS OF LAND SO RESERVED FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES BY THEIR BOUNDARIES, COURSES, AND EXTENT.

THE REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED BELOW IS DEDICATED IN FEE TO THE CITY OF DUBLIN FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES:

1. THE REAL PROPERTY DESIGNATED AS MURPHY AVENUE, MARGARET WAY, DOYLE ROAD, QUINN ROAD, AND GALLAGHER LANE FOR PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PURPOSES.

THE REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED BELOW IS DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF DUBLIN AS EASEMENTS FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES:

1. THE AREAS IN, UNDER, ALONG, AND ACROSS ANY AREA OR STRIP OF LAND DESIGNATED AS PUBLIC SERVICE EASEMENTS (PSE), AS

DELINEATED AND EMBRACED WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE HEREIN EMBODIED MAP, ARE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF DUBLIN FOREVER FOR THE "PURPOSES OF PUBLIC SERVICES" (AS HEREIN DEFINED). THE "PURPOSES OF PUBLIC SERVICES" SHALL INCLUDE THE CONSTRUCTION, RECONSTRUCTION, REMOVING, REPLACING, REPAIRING, MAINTAINING, OPERATING, AND USING "PUBLIC SERVICE FACILITIES" (AS DEFINED HEREIN), AND ACCESS THROUGH THE PUBLIC SERVICE EASEMENT FOR THESE PURPOSES. "PUBLIC SERVICE FACILITIES" SHALL INCLUDE PUBLIC UTILITIES, FIRE HYDRANTS, ELECTROLIERS, IRRIGATION SYSTEMS, SIGNS AND TRAFFIC

SIGNALS, AND ALL NECESSARY APPURTENANCES THERETO SUCH AS BRACES, CONNECTIONS, FASTENINGS, APPLIANCES, AND FIXTURES FOR USE IN CONNECTION THEREWITH. ALL PUBLIC SERVICE EASEMENTS SHALL BE KEPT OPEN AND FREE FROM BUILDINGS OR STRUCTURES OF ANY KIND, WITH THE SOLE EXCEPTION OF PUBLIC SERVICE FACILITIES. ALL PUBLIC SERVICE EASEMENTS SHALL BE CONSIDERED PUBLIC "WAYS" AS THAT TERM IS USED IN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES CODE SECTION 6202, AND ALL PUBLIC

UTILITIES HOLDING A VALID FRANCHISE FROM THE CITY SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT TO USE THE PUBLIC SERVICE EASEMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE FRANCHISE.

2. THE AREAS DESIGNATED AS PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENT (PAE) FOR THE PURPOSE OF PEDESTRIAN INGRESS AND EGRESS.

MAINTENANCE OF SAID AREA SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION GOVERNING TRACT 8647.

AND THE UNDERSIGNED DOES HEREBY RESERVE TO ITSELF AND TO THE OWNERS, RESIDENTS, CUSTOMERS AND OTHERS DESIGNATED BY THE HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION OF TRACT 8647, THE AREAS MARKED AS PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENT (PRAE) AS SHOWN UPON SAID MAP.

SAID AREAS ARE FOR THE PURPOSE OF BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PRIVATE INGRESS AND EGRESS, PRIVATE STREETS, PRIVATE UTILITIES, PRIVATE STORM DRAINS, OVERLAND DRAINAGE RELEASE, LANDSCAPING AND ALL APPURTENANCES. MAINTENANCE OF SAID PRIVATE ACCESS WAYS IS TO BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION GOVERNING TRACT 8647, ALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SUBDIVISION RESTRICTIONS GOVERNING TRACT 8647. SAID AREAS ARE NOT OFFERED FOR DEDICATION TO THE PUBLIC AND ARE TO BE CONVEYED TO THE HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION GOVERNING TRACT 8647 BY SEPARATE INSTRUMENT.

AND THE UNDERSIGNED DOES HEREBY RESERVE FOR FUTURE DEDICATION TO THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION PARCEL A AS SHOWN UPON SAID MAP. SAID PARCEL A TO BE CONVEYED BY SEPARATE INSTRUMENT TO THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION SUBSEQUENT TO THE FILING OF THIS FINAL MAP.

THIS MAP SHOWS ALL EASEMENTS ON THE PREMISES AND/OR OF RECORD, WITHIN THE BOUNDARY LINES OF THE HEREIN EMBODIED MAP.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE UNDERSIGNED HAVE EXECUTED THIS STATEMENT ON THE ______ DAY OF _______________________, 2024.

AS OWNERS: ARROYO CAP IV-3, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY BY: ARROYO CAP IV-2, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY

ITS SOLE MEMBER
BY: ARROYO CAPITAL IV, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY

ITS SOLE MEMBER
BY:

NAME:

TITLE:

CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS' STATEMENT:

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)

COUNTY OF ALAMEDA)

I, ANIKA CAMPBELL-BELTON, CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FOR THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DO HEREBY STATE, AS CHECKED BELOW, THAT:
□ AN APPROVED BOND HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE SUPERVISORS OF SAID COUNTY AND STATE IN THE AMOUNT OF $___________ CONDITIONED FOR THE PAYMENT OF ALL TAXES AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS TAXES, APPROVED BY SAID LOCAL BOARD IN SAID AMOUNT.
□ ALL TAXES AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS TAXES HAVE BEEN PAID AS CERTIFIED BY THE TREASURER-TAX COLLECTOR OF THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I HAVE HEREUNTO SET MY HAND THIS _____ DAY OF ____________, 2024.

ANIKA CAMPBELL-BELTON BY:

CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS DEPUTY COUNTY CLERK

COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY RECORDER'S STATEMENT:

FILED FOR RECORD THIS DAY OF , 2024 AT M., IN BOOK OF MAPS AT PAGES THROUGH , UNDER SERIES NO. 2024 AT THE REQUEST OF FIRST AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.

FEE: $_____________
MELISSA WILK BY:

COUNTY RECORDER IN AND FOR THE COUNTY DEPUTY

OF ALAMEDA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT:

A NOTARY PUBLIC OR OTHER OFFICER COMPLETING THIS CERTIFICATE VERIFIES ONLY THE IDENTITY OF THE

INDIVIDUAL WHO SIGNED THE DOCUMENT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE IS ATTACHED, AND NOT THE TRUTHFULNESS, ACCURACY, OR VALIDITY OF THAT DOCUMENT.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF )
ON , 2024, BEFORE ME , A NOTARY

PUBLIC, PERSONALLY APPEARED

WHO PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE TO BE THE PERSON(S)

WHOSE NAME(S) IS/ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT

HE/SHE/THEY EXECUTED THE SAME IN HIS/HER/THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITY(IES), AND THAT BY

HIS/HER/THEIR SIGNATURE(S) ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSON(S), OR ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON(S) ACTED, EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT.

I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING PARAGRAPH IS TRUE AND CORRECT.

WITNESS MY HAND:

SIGNATURE:

PRINTED NAME, NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID COUNTY AND STATE PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS:

COMMISSION EXPIRES:

COMMISSION # OF NOTARY:

SOILS REPORT NOTE:

A GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, DATED DECEMBER 10, 2021, HAS BEEN PREPARED BY ENGEO INCORPORATED, JOB NO. 5101.001.002 "GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION", FOR THIS SUBDIVISION AND IS ON FILE WITH ALAMEDA COUNTY.

OPTIONEE'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT:

A NOTARY PUBLIC OR OTHER OFFICER COMPLETING THIS CERTIFICATE VERIFIES ONLY THE IDENTITY OF THE INDIVIDUAL

WHO SIGNED THE DOCUMENT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE IS ATTACHED, AND NOT THE TRUTHFULNESS, ACCURACY, OR VALIDITY OF THAT DOCUMENT.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA}
COUNTY OF }
ON , 2024, BEFORE ME , A NOTARY PUBLIC,

PERSONALLY APPEARED

WHO PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE TO BE THE PERSON(S) WHOSE NAME(S) IS SUBSCRIBED

TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE EXECUTED THE SAME IN HIS/HER/THEIR AUTHORIZED

CAPACITY(IES), AND BY HIS/HER/THEIR SIGNATURE(S) ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSON(S), OR ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON(S) ACTED, EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT.

I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING PARAGRAPH IS TRUE AND CORRECT.

WITNESS MY HAND:

SIGNATURE:

PRINTED NAME, NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID COUNTY AND STATE PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS:

COMMISSION EXPIRES:

COMMISSION # OF NOTARY:

OPTIONEE'S STATEMENT:

THE UNDERSIGNED, TH EAST RANCH DUBLIN LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, AS OPTIONEE UNDER THE DOCUMENT RECORDED ON SEPTEMBER 29, 2023, AS DOCUMENT NO. 2023111607, ON MARCH 29, 2024, AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 2024041809, AND ON MARCH 29, 2024, AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 2024041810 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DOES

HEREBY JOIN IN AND CONSENT TO THE FOREGOING OWNERS' STATEMENT AND ALL DEDICATIONS SHOWN HEREIN.

BY: _________________________________
NAME: _________________________________
JULY 2024 TITLE: _________________________________
FRANCIS RANCH, NEIGHBORHOOD 3 CROAK PROPERTY
A SUBDIVISION OF PARCEL 7 & 12 OF TRACT 8563,
RECORDED IN BOOK 371 PAGES 12 THROUGH 22,

ALAMEDA COUNTY RECORDS

CITY OF DUBLIN

ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
TRACT 8647
Attachment 3
168
ACTING CITY SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT:

I HEREBY STATE THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS FINAL MAP ENTITLED “TRACT 8647, FRANCIS RANCH, NEIGHBORHOOD 3, CROAK PROPERTY", AND I AM SATISFIED THAT THIS FINAL MAP IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT.

DATED: , 2024
SETH H. IRISH, PLS 5922, ACTING CITY SURVEYOR

CITY OF DUBLIN, ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT:

THIS MAP WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION AND IS BASED UPON A FIELD SURVEY IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE

REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND LOCAL ORDINANCES AT THE REQUEST OF TRUMARK HOMES, LLC IN JANUARY OF 2022. I HEREBY STATE THAT THIS FINAL MAP SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS TO THE CONDITIONALLY APPROVED TENTATIVE MAP, IF ANY,

AND THAT ALL THE MONUMENTS INDICATED HEREON ARE OF THE CHARACTER AND OCCUPY POSITIONS INDICATED HEREON OR WILL

BE SET WITHIN TWENTY FOUR MONTHS FROM RECORDATION OF THIS FINAL MAP, AND THE COMPLETION OF IMPROVEMENTS, AND

WILL BE SUFFICIENT TO ENABLE THE SURVEY TO BE RETRACED, AND THE SURVEY IS TRUE AND COMPLETE AS SHOWN, AND THAT THE GROSS AREA WITHIN THE TRACT IS 18.42 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.

DATED: , 2024

IAN BRUCE MACDONALD
LS NO. 8817
CITY ENGINEER'S STATEMENT:

I, LAURIE L. SUCGANG, CITY ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN, COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DO HEREBY STATE THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THE HEREIN EMBODIED FINAL MAP ENTITLED “TRACT 8647, FRANCIS RANCH, NEIGHBORHOOD 3, CROAK PROPERTY", CITY OF DUBLIN, ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA”, CONSISTING OF SEVEN (7) SHEETS, THIS STATEMENT BEING UPON SHEET TWO (2) THEREOF, AND THAT THE FINAL MAP WAS PRESENTED TO ME AS PROVIDED BY LOCAL ORDINANCE THIS ________ DAY OF _____________________, 20__, AND THAT THIS MAP CONFORMS WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND LOCAL

ORDINANCES APPLICABLE AT THE TIME OF APPROVAL OF THE VESTING TENTATIVE MAP AND THE SUBDIVISION AS SHOWN IS

SUBSTANTIALLY THE SAME AS IT APPEARED ON THE VESTING TENTATIVE MAP AND ANY APPROVED ALTERATIONS THEREOF, AND THAT I

APPROVE SAID MAP AND ACCEPT, SUBJECT TO IMPROVEMENT, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN, MURPHY AVENUE, MARGARET WAY,

DOYLE ROAD, QUINN ROAD, GALLAGHER LANE, AND PUBLIC SERVICE EASEMENT (PSE), OFFERED FOR DEDICATION FOR PUBLIC USE IN CONFORMITY WITH THE TERMS OF THE OFFER OF DEDICATION . I FURTHER STATE THAT ALL AGREEMENTS AND SURETY REQUIRED BY LAW TO ACCOMPANY THE WITHIN FINAL MAP ARE APPROVED AND ARE FILED WITH THE CITY.

I FURTHER CERTIFY, IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 66434(G) AND 66499.20.2 OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT, THE PUBLIC SERVICE EASEMENT SHOWN ON PARCEL 12 OF TRACT 8563, FILED FOR RECORD IN BOOK 371 OF MAPS AT PAGES 12-22, ALAMEDA COUNTY RECORDS IS HEREBY ABANDONED.

SIGNED: DATED: , 2024
LAURIE L. SUCGANG, RCE 73022

CITY ENGINEER

CITY OF DUBLIN, ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
JULY 2024
FRANCIS RANCH, NEIGHBORHOOD 3 CROAK PROPERTY
A SUBDIVISION OF PARCEL 7 & 12 OF TRACT 8563,
RECORDED IN BOOK 371 PAGES 12 THROUGH 22,

ALAMEDA COUNTY RECORDS

CITY OF DUBLIN

ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
TRACT 8647
BENEFICIARY'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT:

A NOTARY PUBLIC OR OTHER OFFICER COMPLETING THIS CERTIFICATE VERIFIES ONLY THE IDENTITY OF THE INDIVIDUAL

WHO SIGNED THE DOCUMENT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE IS ATTACHED, AND NOT THE TRUTHFULNESS, ACCURACY, OR VALIDITY OF THAT DOCUMENT.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA}
COUNTY OF }
ON , 2024, BEFORE ME , A NOTARY PUBLIC,

PERSONALLY APPEARED

WHO PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE TO BE THE PERSON(S) WHOSE NAME(S) IS SUBSCRIBED

TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE EXECUTED THE SAME IN HIS/HER/THEIR AUTHORIZED

CAPACITY(IES), AND BY HIS/HER/THEIR SIGNATURE(S) ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSON(S), OR ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON(S) ACTED, EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT.

I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING PARAGRAPH IS TRUE AND CORRECT.

WITNESS MY HAND:

SIGNATURE:

PRINTED NAME, NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID COUNTY AND STATE PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS:

COMMISSION EXPIRES:

COMMISSION # OF NOTARY:

BENEFICIARY'S STATEMENT:

THE UNDERSIGNED, WESTERN ALLIANCE BANK, AN ARIZONA CORPORATION, AS BENEFICIARY UNDER THE DOCUMENT RECORDED ON MARCH 29, 2024, AS DOCUMENT NO. 2024041808 OF OFFICIAL

RECORDS OF ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY JOIN IN AND CONSENT TO THE FOREGOING OWNERS' STATEMENT AND ALL DEDICATIONS SHOWN HEREIN.

BY: _________________________________ NAME: _________________________________ TITLE: _________________________________
169
C3
BNDY
52 39
27 MJR
78 68
49 50
65 66
67 63
71 64
70 84 85 86 87 88 89 90
83 82 81 80 79 77 76
73 74
75 72
91 58
51 59
54 60
56 61
53 62
57 55
47 41
38 43
46 45 40
48 37
44 42
26 34
29 25
31 35
28 36
32 33
30 6
12 10
9 11
7 3
5 4
2 1
17 19
15 18
22 20
21 24
23 16
13 14

PARCEL A
8 69 26
34 29
31 35
28 36
32 33
30 6
10 12
9 11
7 3
5 4
2 1
17 19
15 18
22 20
21 24 23
16 14
13 PARCEL A
39 52 8
69 27
78 68
49 50
65 C12 66
BNDY
71 63
70 64
84 85 86 87 88 89 90
83 82 81 80 79 77 76
73 74
75 72
91 58
51 59
54 60
56 61
53 62
57 55
47 41
38 43
46 45
40 48
37 44
42 N90°00'00"E
240.15' BNDY
R=907.00' Δ=13°23'55"
L=212.10' BNDY
R=923.00' Δ=13°23'55"
L=215.84' BNDY
N90°00'00"E

96.80' BNDY C10 BNDY N0°00'00"E 639.00' BNDY
L4(R) BNDY
C11 BNDY
N90°00'00"W
182.00' BNDY
L5(R)
BNDY C13 BNDY
N90°00'00"W
483.00' BNDY
C14 BNDY L6 BNDY
C15 BNDY L7(R) BNDY
C16 BNDY L8 BNDY
L3(R) BNDY L2 BNDY
C
6 B
N
D
Y
C4
C5 BNDY
BNDY
C2 BNDY
C1 BNDY
R=523.00'
Δ=27°44'01"
L=253.16' BNDY
N11°16'13"E
321.01' BNDY
C9 BNDY
C8 BNDY L1 BNDY
C7 BNDY
R=1022.50'
Δ=10°15'39"
L=183.12' M-M
L10
M-PL
N0°00'00"E 386.69' M-M
L11
M-PL
N90°00'00"W
149.34' M-M
N11°16'13"E 156.62' M-M
N11°16'13"E
219.71' M-M
R=505.50'
Δ=33°10'53"
L=292.75' M-M
R=533.00'
Δ=19°42'19"
L=183.31' M-M
R=751.50' Δ=21°00'52" L=275.63' M-M
N07°39'27"E(R)
R= 505.50' N68°05'20"E(R)
R= 533.00' N21°17'55"W(R)
R=751.50' N42°35'10"E(R)
R=533.00' N41°00'14"W(R)
R=751.50' N21°34'17"E(R)
R=1022.50' N79°44'21"W(R)
C17 BNDY
25 N0°00'00"E

42.50' M-PL
L9
M-M
(R-2)
(R-2)
(R-2) (R-2)
67 SEE DETAIL A

THIS SHEET

SEE DETAIL B

THIS SHEET

SEE DETAIL C

THIS SHEET

BASIS OF BEARINGS
EX. PSE (R-1)
EX. PSE (R-1)
N0°00'00"W 287.50' M-M

17.5'

33.5'

27.5'

27.5' 17.5' 17.5' 27.5'

28.5'

28.5' 17.5'

28.5' 17.5' 18'28'
18'

27.5'

28.5'
28'
27'
N11°16'13"E 139.75' M-M
R
=
4 9

4.50' Δ
=11°16'13"
L
=
9 7.27'
M-M N0°00'00"E 672.95' M-M

17.5' 28.5'
R=2022.00'
Δ=7°39'27"
L=270.24' M-M 29'
N90°00'00"W 856.00' M-M 28.5' 28.5'
25 N90°00'00"E

52.50' M-PL 17.50' 28.50' N0°00'00"E 46.00' BNDY N90°00'00"W

47.50' M-M 27.00' 34.00' N0°00'00"E 61.00' BNDY30
84 N90°00'00"E

5.00' BNDY

17.50' 28.50'
N90°00'00"W

46.00' BNDY N0°00'00"E 42.50' M-M
66 Line Table
Line #
L1
L2
L3
L4
L5
L6
L7
L8
L9
L10
L11
Bearing
N90°00'00"W
N0°00'00"E
N0°00'00"E
N90°00'00"W
N90°00'00"W
N0°00'00"E
N0°00'00"E
N0°00'00"E
N0°00'00"E
N90°00'00"E
N90°00'00"W
Length

95.84'
394.19'

46.00'

46.00'
191.00'

61.00'
302.19'

54.50'

52.50'

47.50'
Curve Table
Curve #
C1
C2
C3
C4
C5
C6
C7
C8
C9
C10
C11
C12
C13
C14
C15
C16
C17
Radius

25.00'
561.00'

25.00'
780.00'

25.00'
1056.00'

20.00'
1995.00'

25.00'

71.00'

25.00'

20.00'

15.00'

25.00'
Delta
81°11'39"
11°09'16"
75°45'49"
14°19'08"
73°02'17"
8°03'33"
90°00'00"
6°19'20"
94°56'52"
90°00'00"
90°00'00"
90°00'00"
90°00'00"
90°00'00"
90°00'00"
90°00'00"
90°00'00"
Length

35.43'
109.22'

33.06'
194.93'

31.87'
148.54'

31.42'
220.14'

41.43'
111.53'

39.27'

31.42'

23.56'

39.27'
JULY 2024
FRANCIS RANCH, NEIGHBORHOOD 3

CROAK PROPERTY
A SUBDIVISION OF PARCEL 7 & 12 OF TRACT 8563,
RECORDED IN BOOK 371 PAGES 12 THROUGH 22,

ALAMEDA COUNTY RECORDS

CITY OF DUBLIN

ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
TRACT 8647

BASIS OF BEARINGS
THE BEARING NORTH 00°00'00" EAST BETWEEN MONUMENTS
ON KEVIN STREET SET PER TRACT 8563, FILED FOR
RECORD IN BOOK 371, PAGE 12-22, ALAMEDA COUNTY

RECORDS ARE TAKEN AS THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR
THIS MAP.

REFERENCES
(R-1) TRACT 8563, BK. 371, PG. 12-22, ALAMEDA COUNTY RECORDS (R-2) TRACT 8671, BK. , PG. , ALAMEDA COUNTY RECORDS
170
N7°44'00"E 269.45'(T)
- N0°00'00"E 342.19'(T)
- N0°00'00"E 110.00'(T)
-
N18°53'51"W 143.07'(T)
Δ=2°41'24"
L=49.57'
27 26
34 25
35 36
33 6
9 7
3 5
4 2
1 17
19 18
22 20
21 24
23 16

PARCEL A
8 7128± SF
26 6050± SF
34 8974± SF
25 5610± SF
35 28
6466± SF
36 33
9174± SF
6 9
9396± SF
7 9916± SF
3 9699± SF
5 9929± SF
4 8880± SF
2 9667± SF
1 8247± SF
17 8326± SF
19 8512± SF
18 7689± SF
22 7900± SF
20 7563± SF
21 7103± SF
24 4544± SF
23 16
9665± SF
PAE

PARCEL A
39 6106± SF
8 7392± SF
27 38
40 37
N90°00'00"E 240.15' BNDY N0°00'00"E 302.19' BNDY
R=25.00' Δ=90°00'00" L=39.27' BNDY L1(R) BNDY N0°00'00"E 394.19' BNDY C3 BNDY
R=780.00' Δ=14°19'08"
L=194.93' BNDY
C2
BNDY
R=561.00' Δ=11°09'16"
L=109.22' BNDY
R
=
5 2

3.0 0' Δ
=
2 7°4
4'0 "1 L
=
2 5

3.16' BNDY
N11°16'13"E 321.01' BNDY
N35°06'13"W(R)

45.00'

64.85'
N77°44'41"E(R) 133.01' Δ=4°12'30"
L=38.41' N90°00'00"W 161.43'

72.70'
Δ=1°19'13"
L=12.93'

33.08' L6L5
L4
L3
L2
N90°00'00"W 86.72'

35.06'
108.82' 17.30' 43.16'
N83°56'51"E(R) 145.33' Δ
=
6°12'09"
L
=

56.62' 58.66' 55.00'
N89°36'39"W(R) 147.22'
Δ
=
6°2
6'3 "1
L
=
5 8.8
0'
Δ
=
2°5
9'2
9" L
=
5 5.14'
N90°00'00"W 138.18'
Δ
=
2°2
2'4
0" L
=
4 3.8
3'

11.19'
N90°00'00"W 137.27' 51.34'

23.97' 56.00'
N90°00'00"W 144.88' 70.78'
N83°11'26"W(R) 148.72'
Δ
=
6°2
5'13"
L
=
5 8.61'

56.51' N78°43'47"W 151.05'

18.40'
Δ=4°27'38"
L=40.72' 60.11' 55.00' N78°43'47"W 154.76'

60.00'

33.25'

60.00'

60.11' 50.96'
125.22'
N78°43'47"W 92.20' 49.73' L8 L7
L9 L10
N11°16'13"E 41.80' N90°00'00"E 166.74'
N90°00'00"E 159.88' 50.50'
N90°00'00"E 152.48' 54.50' 56.00'
107.00' 60.00' 51.00'
N90°00'00"W 132.00'

44.00' 35.00'
N90°00'00"W 110.00'

85.00' 51.00'
N90°00'00"W 110.00' 54.00' 55.00'
N90°00'00"W 110.00' 56.00'55.00'
N90°00'00"E 132.00' 56.00'
N90°00'00"E 132.00' 54.00' 55.00'

56.51'
N78°43'47"W 158.47'
N90°00'00"E 141.91'
N90°00'00"W 192.00' 69.00' N0°00'00"E 292.19' N0°00'00"E 386.69' M-M

52.50' M-PL N0°00'00"E 54.50' M-M
R
=10
2 2.5
0' Δ
=10°15'3
9" L
=183.12' M-M
R=533.00' Δ=19°42'19" L=183.31' M-M
R=505.50' Δ
=
3 °10'5
3" L
=
2 9

2.7 5' M-M
N11°16'13"E 219.71' M-M
R=751.50' Δ=21°00'52" L=275.63' M-M
N31°44'18"E(R) N84°37'51"W(R)
N87°37'20"W(R)
R=751.50' N79°44'21"W(R)
R=1022.50' N21°34'17"W(R)
R=751.50' N42°35'10"E(R)
R=533.00' N41°00'14"E(R)
N90°00'00"E 287.50' M-M
N90°00'00"E

5.15' M-M
R=935.50' Δ=13°23'55" L=218.76' M-M N0°00'00"E 386.69' M-M 235.00' M-PL 28.50' 17.50'
18' 28'
18' 28'

33.5'

27.5'

17.5'

17.5'
28'
28'

28.5'

33.5'
R=533.00' N21°17'55"W(R) R=505.50' N68°05'20"E(R)
6' PSE
3' PSE
6' PSE 4' PSE
6' PSE
6' PSE 4' PSE
SEE

DETAIL D

THIS SHEET
Δ=66°19'15"
L=28.94'
EX. PSE (R-1)

53.07' BASIS OF BEARINGS

3.5' PAE
6' PSE

3.5' PAE
R=25.00' Δ=90°00'0 "
L=39.27' PAE DETAIL

SEE THIS SHEET
6' PSE
6'
EX. PSE
6'
EX. PSE
R
=10
5 6.0
0' Δ
=
8°0
3'3
3" L
=14

8.5 4' BNDY
6' PSE

28.5' 3.5' PAE

PAE DETAIL

SEE THIS SHEET

17.5'

PAE DETAIL

SEE THIS SHEET
C1
BNDY
Δ=9°50'04" L=96.29'

28.5'

28.5' 33' PRAE TO LOT 23

41.8'
PRAE TO LOT 8
6' PSE
EX. PSE (R-1)

28.5'

17.5'

28.5'

17.5'

33.5'

27.5'

27.5'
18'
28'

8.41' PSE

15.50'

25.84' 7.25' PSE

11.74'

42.73'
Line Table
Line #
L1
L2
L3
L4
L5
L6
L7
L8
L9
L10
Bearing
N0°00'00"E
N0°00'00"E
N90°00'00"W
N0°00'00"E
N90°00'00"W
N0°00'00"E
N11°16'13"E
N78°43'47"W
N11°16'13"E
N78°43'47"W
Length

46.00'

4.00'

25.58'

3.83'

10.50'

33.00'

4.00'

25.58'

3.83'

10.50'
Curve Table
Curve #
C1
C2
C3
Radius

25.00'

25.00'
Delta
81°11'39"
75°45'49"
73°02'17"
Length

35.43'

33.06'

31.87'
Δ=6°43'03"
L=2.93'
R=25.00' Δ=73°02'17"
L=31.87' BNDY

3.5' PAE

BASIS OF BEARINGS
THE BEARING NORTH 00°00'00" EAST BETWEEN MONUMENTS
ON KEVIN STREET SET PER TRACT 8563, FILED FOR
RECORD IN BOOK 371, PAGE 12-22, ALAMEDA COUNTY

RECORDS ARE TAKEN AS THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR
THIS MAP.

REFERENCES
(R-1) TRACT 8563, BK. 371, PG. 12-22, ALAMEDA COUNTY RECORDS (R-2) TRACT 8671, BK. , PG. , ALAMEDA COUNTY RECORDS
JULY 2024
FRANCIS RANCH, NEIGHBORHOOD 3

CROAK PROPERTY
A SUBDIVISION OF PARCEL 7 & 12 OF TRACT 8563,
RECORDED IN BOOK 371 PAGES 12 THROUGH 22,

ALAMEDA COUNTY RECORDS

CITY OF DUBLIN

ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
TRACT 8647 SEE SHEET 5
SEE SHEET 7

PARCEL A
24 171
N0°00'00"E 355.35'(T)
- N0°00'00"E 392.00'(T)
-
52 39
49 50
58 51
59 60
61 53
62 47
38 46
45 40
48 37 34
35 36
33 6332± SF
7965± SF 52 39
7464± SF
49 6832± SF
50 58
7076± SF
51 6270± SF
59 6105± SF
60 5665± SF
61 53
6576± SF
62 6050± SF
47 7695± SF
38 6292± SF
46 45
40 7097± SF
48 8962± SF
37 N90°00'00"E
240.15' BNDY R=907.00' Δ=13°23'55" L=212.10' BNDY
R=923.00' Δ=13°23'55" L=215.84' BNDY N90°00'00"E 96.80' BNDY R=71.00' Δ=90°00'00" L=111.53' BNDY N0°00'00"E 639.00' BNDY Δ=6°43'47" L=111.93' 55.35' 55.00' N90°00'00"W 135.00' 57.00' 57.00' 57.20' N90°00'00"W 135.00' 59.00' 59.00' N90°00'00"W 135.00'
N90°00'00"W 110.00'
N90°00'00"W 110.00' 57.20'
N90°00'00"W 110.00' 55.00'
C1
R=327.00'
Δ=0°48'07"
L=4.58' 43.27' N90°00'00"W 122.00'

15.27'
R=373.00'
Δ=2°47'42"
L=18.19'
C2 R=877.00' Δ=5°46'17" L=88.34' 11.80' 61.00' 51.50'
N90°00'00"W 110.00'

85.00'
R=25.00'
Δ=90°00'00"
L=39.27' 36.00'
N90°00'00"W 110.00' 56.00' 51.50'
N90°00'00"W 122.00' 56.00' 55.50'
N90°00'00"W 122.00' 58.00' 58.00' 57.00'
N90°00'00"W 110.00' 55.50'
N90°00'00"W 110.00' 51.90' 57.00'
N90°00'00"W 122.00' 51.90' 64.00' 75.35'
N90°00'00"W 96.80' N0°00'00"E 318.27' N0°00'00"E 293.36' N0°00'00"E 318.27' N0°00'00"W 342.00' N09°32'02"W(R) N0°00'00"E 370.27' M-M
R=935.50' Δ=13°23'55" L=218.76' M-M
R=894.50' Δ=4°13'35" L=65.98' M-M
R=894.50' Δ=9°10'19" L=143.19' M-M N90°00'00"E 96.80' M-M N45°00'00"W

60.10' M-M N0°00'00"E 394.00' M-M
N90°00'00"E

5.15' M-M
N90°00'00"E
287.50' M-M N0°00'00"E 386.69' M-M
R=894.50' N09°10'19"W(R)
R=345.00' N80°51'44"E(R)
28'
18' 28'

17.5' 28.5'

17.5' 28.5' 28.5' 17.5' 28.5' 17.5'28.5'

17.5' 28.5'
18' 28'
18' 28' 28.5'

28.5' 4' PSE
6'
PSE
8' PSE
6'
PSE 6'
PSE
6'
PSE
6'
PSE
PSE 4'PSE 4' 4' PSE
6'
PSE
6'
PSE

3.5' PAE 38.36'
R=25.00' Δ=87°11'45"
L=38.05' 17.5'

3.5'
PAE

PAE DETAIL
SEE SHEET 3
R=25.0 ' Δ=101°28'47" L=44.28'3.5' PAE

PAE DETAIL
SEE SHEET 3

17.5'
R
=
3 4

5.0 0' Δ
=
9°0
8'16"
L
=
5 5.0
2' M-M

PAE DETAIL
SEE SHEET 3

8.5' PSE

10.17'

8.5' PSE
6'
PSE

10.17'
18'
Δ=3°51'52"
R=953.00
L=64.28' ' Δ=10°35'39" L=176.21' SEE DETAIL E

THIS SHEET
Curve Table
Curve #
C1
C2
Radius
877.00'

25.00'
Delta
1°07'01"
87°01'24"
Length

17.10'

37.97'
N9°25'32"W(R)

3.30'
N10°07'34"W(R)

3.30'
R=960.30' Δ=0°39'55" L=11.15'
R=960.52'
Δ=0°02'07"
L=0.59' 7.40'
N09°32'02"W(R) PSE 4'

7.3' PSE
N09°27'39"W(R)
R=953.00' Δ=3°51'52" L=64.28'
N0°00'00"E 55.35'
JULY 2024
FRANCIS RANCH, NEIGHBORHOOD 3

CROAK PROPERTY
A SUBDIVISION OF PARCEL 7 & 12 OF TRACT 8563,
RECORDED IN BOOK 371 PAGES 12 THROUGH 22,

ALAMEDA COUNTY RECORDS

CITY OF DUBLIN

ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
TRACT 8647

BASIS OF BEARINGS
THE BEARING NORTH 00°00'00" EAST BETWEEN MONUMENTS
ON KEVIN STREET SET PER TRACT 8563, FILED FOR
RECORD IN BOOK 371, PAGE 12-22, ALAMEDA COUNTY

RECORDS ARE TAKEN AS THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR
THIS MAP.

REFERENCES
(R-1) TRACT 8563, BK. 371, PG. 12-22, ALAMEDA COUNTY RECORDS (R-2) TRACT 8671, BK. , PG. , ALAMEDA COUNTY RECORDS SEE SHEET 4 SEE SHEET 6
37 48
172
R=25.00' Δ=90°00'00"
L=39.27'
BNDY N0°00'00"E 386.69' M-M N0°00'00"E 370.27' M-M
N90°00'00"W 291.00' M-M N90°00'00"W 277.50' M-M
N90°00'00"W
287.50' M-M N0°00'00"E 287.50' M-M N0°00'00"E 394.00' M-M N0°00'00"E 287.50' M-M N90°00'00"E 277.50' M-M 42.50' M-PL 245.00' M-PL 42.50' M-PL 245.00' M-PL 18' 28'

17.5' 28.5' 18' 28'
18' 28'

28.5'

17.5'
18' 28' 17.5'
240.00' M-PL 17.5' 17.5' 17.5' 17.5'
18' 28'
6' PSE
6' PSE 6' PSE
6' PSE
6' PSE
6' PSE
6' PSE
6' PSE
6' PSE
6' PSE
6' PSE
6' PSE 6' PSE
6' PSE 6' PSE 3' PSE 6' PSE 3' PSE5' PSE 5' 3'PSE PSE 3' PSE 3' PSE

85.00' N0°00'00"E 355.35'(T)
- N0°00'00"W 392.00'(T)
-
N90°00'00"E 423.00'(T)
- N0°00'00"E 236.00'(T)
- N0°00'00"E 236.00'(T)
52 39
MJR
78 68
65 66
67 63
71 64
70 88 89 90
79 77 76
73 74
75 72
91 58
59 54
56 53
57 55
41 43
45 40
44 42
69 34
31 32
33 52 39
87 80
46 59
3439± SF
69 6426± SF
78 4613± SF
68 6226± SF
65 7181± SF
66 6832± SF
67 6323± SF
63 7418± SF
71 5962± SF
64 6222± SF
70 5610± SF
89 5841± SF
88 5610± SF
90 6426± SF
79 7258± SF
76 6426± SF
77 5984± SF
73 6270± SF
74 7214± SF
75 6224± SF
72 6248± SF
91 5610± SF
58 6222± SF
54 7016± SF
56 6222± SF
53 5610± SF
57 7198± SF
55 7020± SF
41 7940± SF
43 6292± SF
45 7020± SF
40 6292± SF
44 7966± SF
42 N0°00'00"E 639.00' BNDY
L1(R) BNDY
R=25.00'
Δ=90°00'00"
L=39.27' BNDY
N90°00'00"W 182.00' BNDY
L2(R) BNDY
R=25.00'
Δ=90°00'00"
L=39.27' BNDY
N90°00'00"W 483.00' BNDY 52.00'
N90°00'00"W 135.00' 57.20' 57.20' N90°00'00"W 135.00'
N90°00'00"W 110.00' 52.00'
N90°00'00"W 110.00' 57.20' 57.20'
N90°00'00"W 110.00' 52.00' 48.40'
R=25.00' Δ=90°00'00" L=39.2

85.00' 7' 60.00' 73.40' 52.00'
N90°00'00"W 135.00' 35.00'
110.00'
R=25.00' Δ=90°0 '00" L=39.27'
N90°00'00"W 122.00' 51.00' 51.00'
N90°00'00"W 122.00' 51.00'
N90°00'00"W 110.00' 51.00'
N90°00'00"W 110.00' 51.00'
N90°00'00"W 110.00' 51.00' 51.00'

85.00' 60.10' 65.00'40.00'
R=25.00' Δ=90°00'0 " L=39.27'
N90°00'00"W 122.00' 51.00'

97.00'
R=25.00' Δ=90°0 '00" L=39.27' 35.10' 54.20'
N90°00'00"W 122.00' 36.90'
R=25.00' Δ=90°00'00"
L=39.27' 97.00' 58.70'

85.00'
R=25.00' Δ=90°00' 0" L=39.27' 33.70'
N90°00'00"W 110.00'
N90°00'00"W 110.00' 51.00' 54.20'
N90°00'00"W 110.00' 56.60' 40.83' 56.60' 41.50'

85.00' 57.10' 25.17' 51.00'

33.25' 88.75' N0°00'00"E 33.00'
N90°00'00"W

52.67'
L3
L4
L5
L6
N90°00'00"W 122.00'

66.00' 32.10' 41.80'

85.00' 66.80'
N90°00'00"E 110.00' 57.00' 57.00'
N90°00'00"E 110.00'
N90°00'00"E 110.00' 54.40' 54.40' 57.80'

85.00'
R=25.00' Δ=90°00'00" L=39.27' 32.80'

57.60' N0°00'00"E 110.00'

56.80'

57.60' N0°00'00"E 126.00'

51.00'

51.00' N0°00'00"E 126.00' N0°00'00"E 110.00'

51.00'

51.00' N0°00'00"E 110.00'

51.00'

51.00' N0°00'00"E 126.00'

53.10'

51.00' N0°00'00"E 126.00'

51.00' N0°00'00"E 110.00'

53.10' 61.90' 66.50'
N90°00'00"W 182.00'
N90°00'00"W 122.00' 110.00' 126.00' N0°00'00"E 186.00' N0°00'00"E 186.00' N0°00'00"E 186.00' N0°00'00"E 318.27' N0°00'00"E 318.27' N0°00'00"E 342.00' N0°00'00"E 293.36' N90°00'00"W 195.00' N90°00'00"E 182.00'
N90°00'00"E 488.00'

18.00' 28.00' 17.50' 28.50'

97.00' 34' 27' 34' 27' 34' 27' 5' PSE 28.5' 28.5' 28.5' 28.5'

28.5' 6' PSE 5' PSE 33' PRAE TO LOT 69

8.00' PSE

10.17'

9.5' PSE

4.90' 10.60' 8.5' PSE 6' PSE

10.17' 8.03' PSE 34' 27'
N90°00'00"E 578.50' M-M

10.17'

8.17' PSE

10.17' 8.5' PSE 15.50'

10.29'
8' PSE

10.17'
Line Table
Line #
L1
L2
L3
L4
L5
L6
Bearing
N90°00'00"W
N90°00'00"W
N0°00'00"E
N90°00'00"W
N0°00'00"E
N90°00'00"W
Length

46.00'

4.00'

25.58'

3.83'

10.50'
JULY 2024
FRANCIS RANCH, NEIGHBORHOOD 3

CROAK PROPERTY
A SUBDIVISION OF PARCEL 7 & 12 OF TRACT 8563,
RECORDED IN BOOK 371 PAGES 12 THROUGH 22,

ALAMEDA COUNTY RECORDS

CITY OF DUBLIN

ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
TRACT 8647

REFERENCES
(R-1) TRACT 8563, BK. 371, PG. 12-22, ALAMEDA COUNTY RECORDS (R-2) TRACT 8671, BK. , PG. , ALAMEDA COUNTY RECORDS

BASIS OF BEARINGS
THE BEARING NORTH 00°00'00" EAST BETWEEN MONUMENTS
ON KEVIN STREET SET PER TRACT 8563, FILED FOR
RECORD IN BOOK 371, PAGE 12-22, ALAMEDA COUNTY

RECORDS ARE TAKEN AS THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR
THIS MAP. SEE SHEET 7
SEE SHEET 5
173
N90°00'00"E 423.00'(T)
-
N7°44'00"E 269.45'(T) N0°00'00"E 342.19'(T)
-
27 78
84 85 86 87 88 89
83 82 81 80 79
34 29
31 28
32 33
30 12
10 9
11 17
15 16
13 14
8 26
34 6732± SF
29 7147± SF
31 6732± SF
28 6050± SF
32 6050± SF
33 6987± SF
8314± SF 12
10 5261± SF
9 7222± SF
11 7
17 9230± SF
15 8507± SF
16 6883± SF
14 7668± SF
13 39
6106± SF
8 27
78 5610± SF
86 88 89
5610± SF
87 6305± SF
84 5610± SF
85 7350± SF
83 6426± SF
82 6426± SF
81 6426± SF
80 79
41 40
42 N90°00'00"W 483.00' BNDY
R=25.00'
Δ=90°00'00"
L=39.27' BNDY N0°00'00"E 191.00' BNDY
R=20.00'
Δ=90°00'00"
L=31.42' BNDY L1(R) BNDY
R=15.00'
Δ=90°00'00"
L=23.56' BNDY N0°00'00"E 302.19' BNDY N0°00'00"E 394.19' BNDY N11°16'13"E 321.01' BNDY R=25.00'
Δ=94°56'52"
L=41.43' BNDY
R=1995.00' Δ=6°19'20" L=220.14' BNDY N90°00'00"E 95.84' BNDY R=20.00'
Δ=90°00'00"
L=31.42' BNDY
125.22'
N78°43'47"W 92.20' 49.73' L2
L3
L4
L5
N11°16'13"E 41.80'

56.57'

73.80'

33.25'

4.75'
N79°58'10"E 53.48'

55.43'
N90°00'00"E 166.74' 50.00'

54.53' 50.50' 68.50' N0°00'00"E 136.00' 116.00'

48.50' N0°05'50"E(R) 136.00'47.34'
Δ=0°05'50"
L=3.39' N1°46'39"E(R) 135.11'
Δ=1°40'49"
L=58.50' N3°22'49"E(R) 123.43'
Δ=1°36'10"
L=55.81' Δ=1°41'14"
L=58.75' N5°04'03"E(R) 130.23'
Δ=1°15'17"
L=43.69' 108.81' 51.00'
N90°00'00"E 132.00' 55.00' 51.00'
N90°00'00"W 132.00' 51.00' 55.00' 61.19'
N90°00'00"W 132.00'
112.00'
N90°00'00"W

5.00' BNDY 46.19' 66.19'
R=25.00'
Δ=90°00'00"
L=39.27'

85.00'
N90°00'00"E 110.00' 41.19' 55.00'
N90°00'00"E 110.00' 55.00' 51.00'
N90°00'00"E 110.00'

51.00' N0°00'00"E 110.00'

51.00'

51.00' N0°00'00"E 126.00'

51.00'

51.00' N0°00'00"E 126.00'

51.00' N0°00'00"E 110.00'

51.00'

59.40' N0°00'00"E 110.00'

51.00'

51.00' N0°00'00"E 126.00'

58.10'

34.40' 101.00'

38.10' 90.00'
N78°43'47"W 158.47'

50.46'
N90°00'00"E 173.53' N0°00'00"E 292.19'
N90°00'00"E 197.00'
N90°00'00"E 488.00'
N90°00'00"W 287.50' M-M N0°00'00"E 386.69' M-M N0°00'00"E 386.69' M-M N90°00'00"W 149.34' M-M
N11°16'13"E 156.62' M-M
N11°16'13"E 219.71' M-M

47.50' 240.00' M-PL
M-PL 27.00' 34.00'
N90°00'00"W
291.00' M-M

27.5' 33.5'

27.5'

27.5' 17.5' 17.5' 27' 34'

17.5'

17.5'
27' 27' 27'

33.5' 27.5'
18'
18'
N78°43'47"W 112.00'
8029± SF
30 N0°00'00"W 287.50' M-M 3' PSE
6' PSE 5' PSE
R=20' 6' PSE 6' PSE
5' PSE
6' PSE
EX. PSE
(R-1) EX. PSE
(R-1)
EX. PSE
(R-1) 6' PSE BASIS OF BEARINGS 28.5'

28.5'

28.5' 29'
29' 27'

28.5'

28.5'
28'
28'
6'
3' 6'
6'
5' PSE 6' PSE

41.8'
PRAE TO LOT 8
6' PSE
5' PSE

4.90' 8.5' PSE
6' PSE
R=2022.00' Δ=7°39'27" L=270.24' M-M
N90°00'00"E 578.50' M-M 8' PSE

10.17'

10.60'
Line Table
Line #
L1
L2
L3
L4
L5
Bearing
N0°00'00"E
N11°16'13"E
N78°43'47"W
N11°16'13"E
N78°43'47"W
Length

61.00'

4.00'

25.58'

3.83'

10.50' SEE SHEET 6
SEE SHEET 4
JULY 2024
FRANCIS RANCH, NEIGHBORHOOD 3

CROAK PROPERTY
A SUBDIVISION OF PARCEL 7 & 12 OF TRACT 8563,
RECORDED IN BOOK 371 PAGES 12 THROUGH 22,

ALAMEDA COUNTY RECORDS

CITY OF DUBLIN

ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
TRACT 8647

REFERENCES
(R-1) TRACT 8563, BK. 371, PG. 12-22, ALAMEDA COUNTY RECORDS (R-2) TRACT 8671, BK. , PG. , ALAMEDA COUNTY RECORDS

BASIS OF BEARINGS
THE BEARING NORTH 00°00'00" EAST BETWEEN MONUMENTS
ON KEVIN STREET SET PER TRACT 8563, FILED FOR
RECORD IN BOOK 371, PAGE 12-22, ALAMEDA COUNTY

RECORDS ARE TAKEN AS THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR
THIS MAP.
174

STAFF REPORT

CITY COUNCIL

Page 1 of 2 ends

Agenda Item 5.8
DATE: August 20, 2024
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Linda Smith, City Manager
SUBJECT: Mayor’s Appointment to the Planning Commission Unscheduled Vacancy Prepared by: Marsha Moore, MMC, City Clerk
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The City Council will consider the Mayor’s appointment to fill an unscheduled vacancy on the Planning Commission.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Confirm the Mayor’s appointment of Wahida Rashid to the Planning Commission for the remainder of a term ending December 2026.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

None.

DESCRIPTION:

An unscheduled vacancy occurred on the Planning Commission June 25, 2024, when Councilmember Thalblum was appointed to the City Council vacancy. A notice seeking applications was posted on July 1, 2024, with a deadline of July 19, 2024, for applications.

Planning Commission
Mayor McCorriston reviewed applications from alternate Wahida Rashid, in addition to applications from Seema Badar, Namrata Berry, Shilpa Chandrashekar, Sameer Hakim, Regis Harvey, Mary McMahon, Bradyn Shaw, Chandra Singh, and John Wu.

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

None.
175

Page 2 of 2 ends

NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:

The City Council Agenda was posted and applicants were notified.

ATTACHMENTS:
1) Applications for the Planning Commission
176
Attachment 1
177
178
179
Planning Commission Application
The Planning Commission is an advisory body to the City Council. The Planning Commission is made up of seven community members, including five Planning Commissioners who serve four-year terms, and two Alternate Planning Commissioners who serve two-year terms.

The duties and powers of the Planning Commission are spelled out in Chapter 2.12 of the Dublin Municipal Code and include the power to perform duties in reference to Planning, Zoning, and land use, and to make recommendations, for City Council approval, of the following: A comprehensive, long term General Plan for the physical development of the City and land within the City's sphere of influence; Development plans which are consistent with the General Plan; and Regulations, programs, and ordinances as required for the systematic implementation of the General Plan. Rules for conducting Planning Commission Meetings have been established to provide a framework for running Planning Commission meetings, maintaining decorum, and ensuring opportunities for members of the public to address the Planning Commission. These rules have been adopted in accordance with the Dublin Municipal Code (Chapter 2.12.040.C).

The Planning Commission is required under state law to fill out a disclosure statement which identifies certain financial interest beginning with the immediate twelve-month period prior to your appointment (FPPC Form 700) and attend Ethics Training.

Learn more about the Planning Commission
Date Time *
7/3/2024
First Name *
Seema
Last Name *
Badar
Address *
Street Address
Address Line 2
City
Dublin
State/Province/Region
CA
Postal/Zip Code
94568
Country
United States
Phone (Primary)* Phone (Secondary)
E-mail*
How long have you been a resident of Dublin? *
4 Years
Have you participated in Inside Dublin? *
Yes
No
If yes, what year?
2023
180
Application Questions
Why are you interested in serving on the Planning Commission? I have been actively involved in the Dublin community serving on many Boards, taking courses like Inside Dublin, The Citizens Water Academy, and the Citizens Police Academy. These classes have given me a lot of knowledge about Dublin and how things work. I think it would be a good next step to get involved with the Planning Commission to help work on the growth and development of the city. I am very interested in serving and have applied once before to be a Planning Commissioner.

What is your knowledge of and experience in Planning and Zoning? Although I don’t have direct experience I just took a course on Coursers that covered Solar Energy, Planning and Zoning. This course helped me gain a comprehensive understanding of the principles and practices involved in planning and zoning, particularly as they relate to solar energy projects. The course also made me understand the permitting process and the various local, state, and federal regulations that govern solar energy projects. This includes knowledge of zoning laws, environmental impact assessments, and public policy.

Do you have any experience in urban design, architecture or landscaping? If yes, please describe your experience.

I don’t have direct experience but I have a taken a Coursera Course on Urban Design: Connecting Cities Sustainability and Innovation. This course helped me gain insights into how natural elements are integrated into urban environments, enhancing your understanding of sustainable urban design principles. I learned about innovative landscaping techniques that promote biodiversity, water management, and green infrastructure, which are essential for creating sustainable urban spaces. The course helped me explore the foundational principles of urban design, including the integration of green spaces, pedestrian-friendly infrastructure, and the importance of aesthetics and functionality in urban settings.

What experience, if any, do you have serving on boards, commissions or task forces? Please explain.

I have been actively involved in the community some of my experience on Boards includes:

PFC President, Kolb Elementary
PFC Vice President, Fallon Middle School
Chair, Citizens Bond Oversight Committee
Board Member, Dublin Education Alliance
Member, Dublin Police Chiefs Advisory Panel
Co-Chair Legislative Committee ACDCC
How do you feel about making a decision for the overall good of the community, but unpopular with some neighbors? Making decisions that are not popular with some neighbors can be difficult and sensitive. However, I believe that it’s crucial to consider the overall well-being and long-term benefits for the entire community. I empathize with the concerns of those who may be affected or opposed to the decision, and it’s important to listen and understand their viewpoints. In making such decisions, I strive to ensure a transparent and inclusive process, where all stakeholders have the opportunity to voice their opinions and concerns.

How can the City better ensure that the viewpoints and perspectives of our diverse population are represented when making decisions about city planning?
The City can better ensure that the viewpoints and perspectives of our diverse population are represented in city planning decisions by implementing comprehensive public outreach and engagement strategies, such as hosting town hall meetings, workshops, and focus groups in various neighborhoods to gather input directly from residents. Utilizing multiple communication channels, including social media, local newspapers, community bulletin boards, and translated materials, can help ensure that information reaches a broader audience.

Establishing advisory committees composed of representatives from different demographic groups, including ethnic minorities, young people, seniors, and people with disabilities, can provide ongoing feedback and ensure diverse perspectives are considered.

What is the most important contribution you can make as a member of the Planning Commission? It’s crucial for the City to ensure that the diverse viewpoints and perspectives of all residents are considered in city planning decisions. As Chair of the Citizens Bond Oversight Committee and through my work with PFC, and serving in various boards I’ve honed skills in engaging with diverse community members and addressing their needs. I will implement strategies like town hall meetings, workshops, and focus groups, and utilize multiple communication channels to ensure broad outreach. Establishing advisory committees with representatives from various demographic groups will provide valuable feedback. Continuous evaluation and improvement of engagement processes are essential. My experience in effective community engagement through listening, adaptability, and inclusivity will make me a strong planning commissioner for Dublin.
181
Planning Commission Application
The Planning Commission is an advisory body to the City Council. The Planning Commission is made up of seven community members, including five Planning Commissioners who serve four-year terms, and two Alternate Planning Commissioners who serve two-year terms.

Learn more about the Planning Commission
Date Time *
7/18/2024
First Name *
Namrata
Last Name *
Berry
Address *
Street Address
Address Line 2
Dublin
City
Dublin
State/Province/Region
CA
Postal/Zip Code
94568
Country
United States
Phone (Primary)* Phone (Secondary)
E-mail*
How long have you been a resident of Dublin? *
12 Have you participated in Inside Dublin? * If yes, what year? Yes
No
182
Application Questions
Why are you interested in serving on the Planning Commission? I am motivated to serve on the planning commission due to my commitment to community impact, public service, shaping policy, problemsolving, professional growth, personal passion, and preserving community character.

What is your knowledge of and experience in Planning and Zoning? While I currently have no formal knowledge or experience in Planning and Zoning, I am highly motivated to learn and contribute. I am eager to immerse myself in the necessary training and educational opportunities to gain a comprehensive understanding of Planning and Zoning principles and practices.

Do you have any experience in urban design, architecture or landscaping? If yes, please describe your experience.

I do not have any experience in urban design, architecture, or landscaping. However, I am eager to learn and am committed to gaining the necessary knowledge and skills to effectively contribute to the Planning Commission.

What experience, if any, do you have serving on boards, commissions or task forces? Please explain.

I serve as the Assistant Governor for Rotary District 5170, Area 5, which includes Dublin, Livermore, Livermore Valley, Tri-Valley Evening, Pleasanton North, and Pleasanton Downtown Clubs. I was also the President of the Rotary Club of Dublin, California, from July 2023 to June 2024.

I have been a member of the Police Chief Advisory Panel since May 2023, where I work closely with law enforcement to provide community feedback and support.

How do you feel about making a decision for the overall good of the community, but unpopular with some neighbors? Making decisions for the overall good of the community, even if they are unpopular with some neighbors, is a necessary and sometimes challenging aspect of serving on a Planning Commission. I understand that not all decisions will please everyone, but I believe in focusing on long-term benefits and the greater good.

I am committed to considering all perspectives, engaging in open communication, and making informed, fair decisions. I will strive to balance individual concerns with the needs of the community as a whole, ensuring that decisions are made transparently and with the best interests of the entire community in mind.

How can the City better ensure that the viewpoints and perspectives of our diverse population are represented when making decisions about city planning?
Ensuring that the viewpoints and perspectives of a diverse population are represented in city planning decisions is crucial for creating inclusive and equitable communities. Here are some strategies the City can implement:

1. Community Engagement: Actively reach out to various community groups, including those that are often underrepresented, through town hall meetings, workshops, and public forums. These events should be scheduled at various times and locations to maximize participation.

2. Diverse Representation: Ensure that planning committees, advisory panels, and other decision-making bodies reflect the diversity of the community. This can be achieved through targeted recruitment and outreach efforts.

3. Surveys and Feedback: Use surveys, both online and offline, to gather input from a broad cross-section of the community. Make these surveys available in multiple languages and formats to accommodate different needs.

4. Focus Groups: Conduct focus groups with representatives from different demographic and interest groups to gain deeper insights into their specific concerns and priorities.

5. Partnerships with Community Organizations: Collaborate with local community organizations, cultural groups, and advocacy groups to reach and engage diverse populations. These organizations often have established trust and communication channels within their communities.

6. Transparent Communication: Maintain open and transparent communication channels to keep the community informed about planning processes and decisions. Use multiple platforms, including social media, local newspapers, and community bulletin boards. 183

7. Youth Involvement: Engage young people in the planning process by working with schools, youth organizations, and social media platforms that are popular with younger demographics.

8. Accessibility: Ensure that all public meetings, materials, and communication are accessible to people with disabilities. Provide interpretation services, captioning, and translation services as needed.

9. Inclusive Planning Practices: Adopt planning practices that prioritize inclusivity, such as participatory budgeting, where community members directly decide how to allocate a portion of the city’s budget.

10. Regular Review and Adaptation: Regularly review the effectiveness of community engagement strategies and adapt them based on feedback and changing community dynamics.

By implementing these strategies, the City can create a more inclusive planning process that better represents the diverse perspectives of its population.

What is the most important contribution you can make as a member of the Planning Commission? I aim to contribute to the creation of a vibrant, equitable, and sustainable community through thoughtful and inclusive planning. 184
Planning Commission Application
The Planning Commission is an advisory body to the City Council. The Planning Commission is made up of seven community members, including five Planning Commissioners who serve four-year terms, and two Alternate Planning Commissioners who serve two-year terms.

Learn more about the Planning Commission
Date Time *
7/19/2024
First Name *
Shilpa
Last Name *
Chandrashekar
Address *
Street Address
Address Line 2
City
Dublin
State/Province/Region
CA
Postal/Zip Code
94568
Country
United States
Phone (Primary)* Phone (Secondary)
E-mail*
How long have you been a resident of Dublin? *
10 Have you participated in Inside Dublin? *
Yes
No
If yes, what year?
185
Application Questions
Why are you interested in serving on the Planning Commission? I have been a resident of Dublin for the past ten years. We moved to this quaint small town from the East Coast as a young family and have seen our children grow and flourish here. There is a strong desire in me to serve this community, to give back and make a positive contribution in any capacity as possible. To be on the Planning Commission would be great opportunity to make a meaningful impact to the wellbeing and future of this amazing town.

What is your knowledge of and experience in Planning and Zoning? I have an undergraduate degree in Architecture and graduate degree in Historic conservation. The past twenty-five years of my professional career has been working with various jurisdiction, quasi government agencies (both nationally and internationally) to develop comprehensive plans addressing economic, cultural, demographic needs to cities and towns.

Past experience include working with agencies to develop historic architectural corridor incorporating bylaws, zoning, façade treatment, setbacks and building style.

Assist agencies in developing regulatory framework for future construction/development, accessibility, environmental management of limited resources etc.

Do you have any experience in urban design, architecture or landscaping? If yes, please describe your experience.

I have been in the field of design and planning for the past twenty-five years. Past experiences include working with Heritage Lottery Fund of England, UK to restore, modernize and adapt Victorian buildings to modern day functions.

Having worked with major builders in the Bay Area as Forward Planning Manager, it was my responsibility to present and seek approval for housing developments in many of the bay area jurisdictions (City of San Jose – Communication Hill Project, City of Mountain View – Rengstroff Avenue Project, City of Santa Clara - El Camino Real Project). Many of these projects involved meeting state and city requirements on affordable housing quotes.

Have immense experience working/coordinating with consultants in design, engineering, environmental and title companies.

Have good experience and knowledge on land development, building construction costs, managing and negotiating price per sq.ft of construction costs etc.

My past experience with a major builder as pre construction manager, I project managed and advocated for new innovation in build technology, such and pre-framing, modular design and clean, clear choices of materials and design options.

I am also an International Code Council certified Building Plans Examiner and have extensive knowledge building codes and jurisdiction reach codes. Past experience include representing third part service providers at city of Livermore, Fremont, Dublin and Santa Clara.

What experience, if any, do you have serving on boards, commissions or task forces? Please explain.

Served as member of the Southbury Historical Society, Connecticut for over two years contributing to the educational and recreational goals of the society to residents of Southbury.

Served as a president of a Home Owners Association @ a community in West Dublin.

Currently on the School Site Council at Fallon Middle School, serving a two-year term.

How do you feel about making a decision for the overall good of the community, but unpopular with some neighbors? It is never an easy task to make unpopular decisions. Hence it is all the more important that considerable deliberation, thought and impacts are weighed before making such a decision.

Interests need to be balanced, staying true to the vision and have ethical responsibility. One has to carry the burden of this land and community is not just for us but also for the future generations to come.

How can the City better ensure that the viewpoints and perspectives of our diverse population are represented when making decisions about city planning?
We are fortunate in live and thrive in a diverse community representing demography from all corners of the world. Hence it is all the more important that decisions are weighed on data analysis, public outreach and consultation, equity impact, economic viability, partnership with transparency in communications and an equitable representation reflecting the demography on the boards. These are some of the variables that the city needs to factor in when making decisions about city planning.

What is the most important contribution you can make as a member of the Planning Commission? As a trained architectural designer with a professional experience spanning over two decades, I would bring the unique perspective of being on both sides of decision making. I spent many years seeking approval from planning boards and would be an honor to be part of a board in making educated, informed decisions for the city.

As a resident of this diverse town and as a parent of two teens, I am vested for this city to grow and thrive so it remains a home for our children as it is for us now. 186
Planning Commission Application
The Planning Commission is an advisory body to the City Council. The Planning Commission is made up of seven community members, including five Planning Commissioners who serve four-year terms, and two Alternate Planning Commissioners who serve two-year terms.

Learn more about the Planning Commission
Date Time *
7/19/2024
First Name *
Sameer
Last Name *
Hakim
Address *
Street Address
Address Line 2
City
Dublin
State/Province/Region
CA
Postal/Zip Code
94568
Country
USA
Phone (Primary)* Phone (Secondary)
E-mail*
How long have you been a resident of Dublin? *
16 Have you participated in Inside Dublin? *
Yes
No
If yes, what year?
2014
187
Application Questions
Why are you interested in serving on the Planning Commission? I am deeply committed to Dublin's sustainable and inclusive growth. My extensive experience in community service, particularly in the Parks and Community Services Commission, has equipped me with a solid understanding of the city's needs and aspirations. I am passionate about contributing to the long-term physical development of Dublin, ensuring that our growth aligns with the values and expectations of our diverse community. Serving on the Planning Commission would allow me to leverage my skills and experience to make impactful recommendations on planning, zoning, and land use that support Dublin's vision for the future. Having lived in Dublin since 2007, I am well aware of the challenges and transformations it has undergone while continuing to be "the American Backyard." What is your knowledge of and experience in Planning and Zoning? My knowledge of planning and zoning is grounded in my five-year tenure as a Commissioner in the Parks and Community Services Commission, where I have reviewed various community projects and made valuable contributions. I have worked closely with city staff and fellow commissioners to ensure that our parks, recreational programs, and community services align with the city's planning and zoning regulations. My ten years on the Sorrento HOA Board have given me practical experience in local governance, including navigating zoning laws and ensuring community projects comply with municipal regulations. My experience on the Dublin Unified School District (DUSD) school board has provided insights into the importance of strategic planning in creating supportive and functional community environments.

Additionally, as an InfraGard member, I have gained valuable insights into infrastructure protection and cybersecurity, which are increasingly important in urban planning. I have a firm grasp of the regulatory and strategic aspects of planning and zoning, ensuring that community projects align with city regulations and long-term goals.

Do you have any experience in urban design, architecture or landscaping? If yes, please describe your experience.

Yes, I have experience in urban design and landscaping through my role in the Parks and Community Services Commission. I have reviewed and provided input on various park designs, landscape projects, and community facility enhancements. These projects required a keen understanding of urban design principles to ensure they met the needs of our residents while enhancing the aesthetic and functional aspects of our community spaces. My involvement in these projects has honed my ability to effectively assess and contribute to the planning and design of public spaces. My California real estate license has further enriched my understanding of property development and the importance of aesthetic and functional design in increasing property value. Additionally, my involvement in the Clipper Card Project required collaboration with various transit operators and understanding the urban design implications of public transportation systems.

What experience, if any, do you have serving on boards, commissions or task forces? Please explain.

I have substantial experience serving on boards, commissions, and task forces. I am a Commissioner in the Parks and Community Services Commission, where I have served for five years, including terms as chair and vice-chair. I was also a Trustee on the Dublin Unified School District (DUSD) school board from 2015 to 2016. Additionally, I have served on the Dublin Partners in Education (DPIE) board and have been involved in various school district committees, such as the District Optimization Committee and the School Site Council. I have also worked on multiple Parks and Community Services Commission committees. Furthermore, I lead the Employee Network Group at my current company, Palo Alto Networks, where I am involved with building employee engagement. These roles have given me extensive experience in policy development, stakeholder engagement, and collaborative decision-making.

How do you feel about making a decision for the overall good of the community, but unpopular with some neighbors? Making decisions for the overall good of the community is a critical responsibility, even when those decisions may be unpopular with some neighbors. As a public servant, it is essential to balance individual concerns with the broader interests of the community. My approach involves transparent communication, listening to diverse viewpoints, and making informed decisions based on comprehensive analysis and long-term benefits. My experience on an HOA Board has taught me how to navigate conflicts and make decisions that may not always be popular but are necessary for the community's welfare. Additionally, my real estate background helps me understand the impact of planning decisions on property values and the overall market, ensuring that decisions contribute positively to the community's development. While it is challenging to satisfy everyone, my focus will always be on what is best for the community, ensuring that our city develops in a way that benefits all residents.

How can the City better ensure that the viewpoints and perspectives of our diverse population are represented when making decisions about city planning?
The city can better ensure that diverse viewpoints and perspectives are represented by actively engaging with different community groups through various channels, such as town hall meetings, online surveys, focus groups, and community advisory panels. It is crucial to create inclusive platforms where residents feel heard and valued. Additionally, appointing a diverse group of commissioners and advisory board members who reflect the city's demographics can bring different perspectives to the decision-making process. Enhancing transparency and communication about planning initiatives and encouraging community participation can foster a more inclusive planning process. 188
What is the most important contribution you can make as a member of the Planning Commission? As a member of the Planning Commission, my most important contribution would be my ability to bring a balanced, informed, and community-focused perspective. My extensive experience in community service, policy development, and strategic planning positions me to make thoughtful and impactful recommendations. My background in technology, public transportation, and cybersecurity allows me to understand and address the modern challenges facing city planning. My ten years on an HOA Board have given me practical governance experience and a deep understanding of community needs and concerns. Additionally, my California real estate license has given me valuable insights into property laws, market trends, and real estate transactions, enabling me to make informed decisions that benefit the community. I am committed to promoting sustainable development, enhancing the quality of life for residents, and ensuring that our city's growth aligns with the values and needs of our diverse population. My dedication to transparent communication and collaborative problemsolving will help build consensus and drive positive outcomes for Dublin. 189
Planning Commission Application
The Planning Commission is an advisory body to the City Council. The Planning Commission is made up of seven community members, including five Planning Commissioners who serve four-year terms, and two Alternate Planning Commissioners who serve two-year terms.

Learn more about the Planning Commission
Date Time *
7/1/2024
First Name *
Regis
Last Name *
Harvey
Address *
Street Address
Address Line 2
City
Dublin
State/Province/Region
CA
Postal/Zip Code
94568
Country
USA
Phone (Primary)* Phone (Secondary)
E-mail*
How long have you been a resident of Dublin? *
10 Have you participated in Inside Dublin? *
Yes
No
If yes, what year?
190
Application Questions
Why are you interested in serving on the Planning Commission? Serving on the Planning Commission offers a unique opportunity to contribute to the growth and development of the community. Here are some reasons someone might be interested:

Community Impact: Directly influence the planning and development of the area, ensuring sustainable growth and improvement of living standards.

Civic Engagement: Engage with and understand the community’s needs, working closely with residents and other stakeholders.

Urban Development: Play a key role in shaping the urban landscape, from zoning decisions to infrastructure projects.

Policy Implementation: Help translate policies and plans into tangible projects and initiatives that benefit the community.

Professional Growth: Gain experience and insights into urban planning, governance, and public administration.

Environmental Stewardship: Advocate for environmentally sustainable practices in development projects.

Economic Development: Support initiatives that promote economic growth, job creation, and improved quality of life for residents.

What is your knowledge of and experience in Planning and Zoning? I have a strong interest in serving on the Planning Commission because I am passionate about contributing to the development and wellbeing of our community. While my direct knowledge and experience in planning and zoning are limited, I am highly motivated to learn and grow in this field. I am committed to gaining the necessary knowledge and skills, and I have already started by attending local planning meetings and reading up on zoning laws and regulations.

My background in affordable housing and human services has equipped me with valuable skills that I believe are transferable to this role.

For instance, I have strong analytical skills, excellent communication abilities, and experience working collaboratively in team settings. I am confident that these skills will enable me to effectively contribute to the Planning Commission.

Additionally, I have a history of active community involvement through Diversity Inclusion Alliance (DIA), Diablo Black Men Group (DBMG) non-profit scholarship program, collaboration with Asian and Pacific Islander (AAPI), Tri-Valley Non-profit Alliance, Camp Parks military base are to name a fews in which demonstrates my dedication to public service and my desire to make a positive impact on our community. I am excited about the opportunity to serve on the Planning Commission and am fully committed to working hard, learning quickly, and making meaningful contributions.

Do you have any experience in urban design, architecture or landscaping? If yes, please describe your experience.

While I do not have direct experience in urban design, architecture, or landscaping, I am very interested in these fields and eager to learn more about them. I believe my background in affordable housing has provided me with valuable skills that are relevant to these areas. For example, my experience in project management has taught me how to effectively coordinate multiple stakeholders, manage timelines, and ensure that projects meet their goals.

Additionally, I have always been passionate about community beautification projects, volunteering for local park cleanups, etc.], which has given me a basic understanding of the importance of thoughtful design and planning in creating vibrant, livable spaces.

What experience, if any, do you have serving on boards, commissions or task forces? Please explain.

I have more than four years experience serving on the Human Services Commission. In my time I have serve as Vice-Chair and Chair person on the commission. I enjoy serving for the people of Dublin and the commission. I also have experience serving as a board member for a non-profit organization for four years.

How do you feel about making a decision for the overall good of the community, but unpopular with some neighbors? I understand that making decisions for the overall good of the community can sometimes be unpopular with some neighbors. It is indeed a challenging aspect of serving on the Planning Commission. However, I believe that prioritizing the long-term benefits and overall welfare of the community is essential.

My approach to such situations would be to ensure that decisions are made fairly, objectively, and based on thorough research and evidence. I would strive to balance the immediate concerns of affected neighbors with the broader goals of sustainable growth, environmental stewardship, and economic development.

Moreover, I believe in the importance of transparent communication and community involvement. By clearly explaining the reasons behind decisions and actively listening to the concerns of all stakeholders, we can build trust and understanding. While it may not always be possible to satisfy everyone, I am committed to making decisions that are in the best interest of the community as a whole. 191
How can the City better ensure that the viewpoints and perspectives of our diverse population are represented when making decisions about city planning?
Diverse Appointments: Ensure that boards, commissions, and advisory groups include members from diverse backgrounds to reflect the community's demographics. This included, but not only limited to cultural, ethnic group, race, religion, economic status and age.

Holding Town Halls, listening circles, and surveys can allow the opportunity to gather diverse perspectives and viewpoints and other meaningful data.

Collaborate with Local Organizations: Work with non-profits, cultural groups, and community leaders who have established trust within various communities to help disseminate information and gather feedback.

Neighborhood Associations: Engage with neighborhood associations to understand local concerns and priorities.

It's important to take in consideration of the decisions made and the impact on a specific population and community as a whole.

What is the most important contribution you can make as a member of the Planning Commission? Balancing Diverse Interests:

Act as a mediator between different stakeholders, ensuring that the interests of residents, businesses, and developers are balanced fairly. I have the ability to look at situations from multiple point of views and lens and understand perspectives.

Promoting Inclusivity:

Advocate for the inclusion of diverse voices in the planning process, ensuring that all community members, regardless of background, have a say in development decisions.
192
Planning Commission Application
The Planning Commission is an advisory body to the City Council. The Planning Commission is made up of seven community members, including five Planning Commissioners who serve four-year terms, and two Alternate Planning Commissioners who serve two-year terms.

Learn more about the Planning Commission
Date Time *
7/1/2024
First Name *
Mary
Last Name *
McMahon
Address *
Street Address
Address Line 2
City
Dublin
State/Province/Region
California
Postal/Zip Code
94568
Country
United States
Phone (Primary)* Phone (Secondary)
E-mail*
How long have you been a resident of Dublin? *
3 Have you participated in Inside Dublin? *
Yes
No
If yes, what year?
193
Application Questions
Why are you interested in serving on the Planning Commission? I am interested in serving on the Planning Commission because I want to be involved in my community and be part of making it a better place to live. I have lived in the City of Dublin for only 3 years and I think the City is amazing. I see how much time and effort is put into the community, and how people care and try to make a difference. I was not born and raised in a community like that, but I want my kids to be raised in this type of community, and I want to be part of this amazingness and just make it better. I also would like the knowledge of what is going on with my community that I can bring back to my HOA board and get more people involved with our community.

What is your knowledge of and experience in Planning and Zoning? I have worked in the GIS field for 4 years in the City of Pleasanton making maps and projecting data for Pleasanton planners. I was part of the redistricting committee in Pleasanton and created all the maps and district layers that are currently being shown on the City website. I am part of daily zoning projects. We are currently working on a project to make a zoning app for residents within the city, and for our permitting team. My Bachelors degree is in Enviromental Science, minoring in Urban Planning.

Do you have any experience in urban design, architecture or landscaping? If yes, please describe your experience.

I have a minor in Urban Planning from Cal State East Bay. I am part of the project to help redesign Stoneridge Mall at the City on Pleasanton.

I admire Architecture. I quite frequently work with Landscape Architects. Having knowledge in Urban Planning, I worked on college projects building water efficient landscaping.

What experience, if any, do you have serving on boards, commissions or task forces? Please explain.

I have lots of experience on Boards and Committees. I am currently on my HOA board in my condo complex. We help make decisions on the complex. I am part of the DEIB committee in Pleasanton. We bring inclusion, belonging, and equity to city employees. I am also the leader of the Employee Engagement committee in Pleasanton. We plan events and connect individuals within the City.

How do you feel about making a decision for the overall good of the community, but unpopular with some neighbors? I am the HOA board in my community. There are many times when I am part of decisions that are not popular with all the neighbors.

Recently due to inflation and some of our upcoming projects we had to raise the monthly HOA amount. It did not resonate well with the community. To help them understand the reasoning I created a newsletter that explained why rates had to be raised and provided transparency for them to understand why rates were increased.

How can the City better ensure that the viewpoints and perspectives of our diverse population are represented when making decisions about city planning?
I think one of the most important factors is providing newsletters and other form of communication in different languages so everyone can understand. I think the City of Dublin's social media is fantastic! Providing links on Instagram and facebook to get polling and spread knowledge. Being part of GIS I would suggest doing demographic studies, and seeing based on neighborhoods what is the primary demographic, and start by reaching out to those areas. This can easily be done with census data.

What is the most important contribution you can make as a member of the Planning Commission? The best contribution I can bring is my skills and knowledge. I have a total of 11 years in the GIS field. Being part of the Planning Commission is reading maps and studying data. I know, I provide maps and data to the City of Pleasanton's Planning Commissioners. I have the experience of looking at a map and understanding what it means, I can easily read data, and I also have background with Urban Planning. 194
Planning Commission Application
The Planning Commission is an advisory body to the City Council. The Planning Commission is made up of seven community members, including five Planning Commissioners who serve four-year terms, and two Alternate Planning Commissioners who serve two-year terms.

Learn more about the Planning Commission
Date Time *
7/14/2024
First Name * Last Name *
Shaw
State/Province/Region
CA
Country
United States
Phone (Secondary)
Bradyn
Address *
Street Address
Address Line 2
City
Dublin
Postal/Zip Code
94568
Phone (Primary)*
E-mail*
How long have you been a resident of Dublin? *
1 Have you participated in Inside Dublin? * If yes, what year? Fall 2024
195
Application Questions
Why are you interested in serving on the Planning Commission? I want to be a part of the planning of the city of Dublin as I plan to become a long term resident and how the city grows will affect me and my future family in the long term.

What is your knowledge of and experience in Planning and Zoning? I do not have extensive experience in planning and zoning but have had exposures with past projects.

Do you have any experience in urban design, architecture or landscaping? If yes, please describe your experience.

No
What experience, if any, do you have serving on boards, commissions or task forces? Please explain.

I served as a non-voting member of the Board of Trustees for my College as the Student Body President.

I served as the president of the Alumni Board for a Leadership Organization for 2 years.

How do you feel about making a decision for the overall good of the community, but unpopular with some neighbors? Making decisions for groups is never easy as one side will always feel they are wronged. But in the end, if it is good for the community, everyone wins.

How can the City better ensure that the viewpoints and perspectives of our diverse population are represented when making decisions about city planning?
Dublin
What is the most important contribution you can make as a member of the Planning Commission? As a young person just starting to look at buying a house in the Dublin area, the fresh perspective I would bring to the table could benefit by bringing viewpoints that may otherwise not be thought about. 196
Planning Commission Application
The Planning Commission is an advisory body to the City Council. The Planning Commission is made up of seven community members, including five Planning Commissioners who serve four-year terms, and two Alternate Planning Commissioners who serve two-year terms.

Learn more about the Planning Commission
Date Time *
7/4/2024
First Name *

CHANDRA
Last Name *
SINGH
Address *
Street Address
Address Line 2
City
DUBLIN
State/Province/Region
CA
Postal/Zip Code
94568
Country
United States
Phone (Primary)* Phone (Secondary)
E-mail*
How long have you been a resident of Dublin? *
3 Have you participated in Inside Dublin? *
Yes
No
If yes, what year?
197
Application Questions
Why are you interested in serving on the Planning Commission? The rate of our community has been poor. I was a retired FOUNDER PROFESSOR of a school. Our new regulation.

What is your knowledge of and experience in Planning and Zoning? A person with a experience.

Do you have any experience in urban design, architecture or landscaping? If yes, please describe your experience.

Our state CALIFORNIA
What experience, if any, do you have serving on boards, commissions or task forces? Please explain.

NONE
How do you feel about making a decision for the overall good of the community, but unpopular with some neighbors?

NON POLITICAL
How can the City better ensure that the viewpoints and perspectives of our diverse population are represented when making decisions about city planning?
Representation:
1 local
What is the most important contribution you can make as a member of the Planning Commission? AGE
198
Planning Commission Application
The Planning Commission is an advisory body to the City Council. The Planning Commission is made up of seven community members, including five Planning Commissioners who serve four-year terms, and two Alternate Planning Commissioners who serve two-year terms.

Learn more about the Planning Commission
Date Time *
7/16/2024
First Name *
John
Last Name *
Wu
Address *
Street Address
Address Line 2
City
Dublin
State/Province/Region
CA
Postal/Zip Code
94568
Country
United States
Phone (Primary)* Phone (Secondary)
E-mail*
j
How long have you been a resident of Dublin? *
13+
Have you participated in Inside Dublin? *
Yes
No
If yes, what year?
199
Application Questions
Why are you interested in serving on the Planning Commission? I am interested in serving on the planning commission because I am passionate about contributing to the thoughtful development and growth of our community. Having lived in Dublin for over 13 years and being deeply involved in real estate in the Bay Area for over 23 years, I have a comprehensive understanding of the local real estate market, property management, and the differences between residential and commercial developments. My extensive knowledge in renovation and construction, combined with my professional experience, enables me to provide valuable insights into the planning process.

Additionally, my commitment to community service is reflected in my role as a member of the Dublin Sister City Committee, where I have actively participated in fostering relationships with other cities around the world and promoting cultural exchange. Serving on the planning commission would allow me to further utilize my skills and experience to ensure that Dublin continues to grow in a sustainable and wellplanned manner, preserving the quality of life for all residents.

I am dedicated to maintaining Dublin's unique character while supporting strategic development initiatives that benefit the entire community. My goal is to contribute to informed decision-making that balances growth with the needs and interests of our residents.

What is your knowledge of and experience in Planning and Zoning? I have over 23 years of experience in real estate, during which I have extensively dealt with planning and zoning regulations. As a real estate broker and owner of a brokerage firm in the Bay Area, I have navigated various zoning laws and planning requirements for real estate properties. My work involves understanding zoning codes, land use policies, and development regulations to ensure compliance and successful project execution based on my clients' needs.

Additionally, my knowledge in renovation and real estate transactions further enhances my ability to assess and contribute to planning and zoning decisions. This experience has equipped me with a comprehensive understanding of how planning and zoning impact property development and community growth.

Do you have any experience in urban design, architecture or landscaping? If yes, please describe your experience.

Yes, I have experience in urban design, architecture, and landscaping through my extensive work in real estate over the years. As a real estate broker and owner of a brokerage firm, I have been involved in numerous projects that required a deep understanding of these fields.

My experience includes overseeing property renovations and reconstruction projects, where I collaborated with architects, designers, and landscapers to ensure that the final outcome meets both the aesthetic and functional goals of my clients. I have also been involved in the planning and development of residential properties for my clients, which required a keen eye for design, an understanding of urban planning principles, and knowledge of sustainable landscaping practices. This hands-on experience has provided me with a comprehensive understanding of the various aspects of urban design, architecture, and landscaping.

What experience, if any, do you have serving on boards, commissions or task forces? Please explain.

I have served on the Dublin School District Budget Committee and the Dublin Sister City Committee. In these roles, I have been actively involved in decision-making processes and strategic planning. My experience on these committees has equipped me with skills in collaboration, community engagement, and policy development, all of which are valuable for serving effectively on boards, commissions, or task forces.

How do you feel about making a decision for the overall good of the community, but unpopular with some neighbors? As one of the community members in our city, I believe that making decisions for the overall good of the community is essential, even if sometimes they are unpopular with some neighbors. As a community leader, it's important to consider the long-term benefits and the greater good while also listening to and addressing the concerns of all residents. Balancing these factors requires transparency, effective communication, and a commitment to the community’s best interests. I am prepared to make difficult decisions that support sustainable growth and improve the quality of life for everyone, even if they are not universally accepted.

How can the City better ensure that the viewpoints and perspectives of our diverse population are represented when making decisions about city planning?
The City can better ensure diverse representation in planning decisions by actively engaging all community segments through various channels. This includes holding public forums, workshops, and town hall meetings, as well as utilizing digital platforms for broader participation. Forming advisory committees with representatives from different demographic groups and partnering with local organizations can also provide valuable insights. Additionally, conducting surveys and focus groups in multiple languages can help gather a wide range of perspectives, ensuring that the city's planning reflects the needs and desires of its diverse population. 200
What is the most important contribution you can make as a member of the Planning Commission? The most important contribution I can make as a member of the Planning Commission is leveraging my extensive real estate experience and community involvement to ensure well-informed, balanced, and forward-thinking decisions. With over 23 years in the real estate business, including property management, renovation, and reconstruction, I bring a deep understanding of the complexities of development and the importance of sustainable growth. My commitment to community service and my knowledge of local needs will help ensure that planning decisions enhance the quality of life for all residents while preserving the unique character of our city. 201

STAFF REPORT

CITY COUNCIL

Page 1 of 3 ends

Agenda Item 5.9
DATE: August 20, 2024
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Linda Smith, City Manager
SUBJECT: Ordinance Amending Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 7.74 (Stormwater Management and Discharge Control) and Ordinance Amending Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 7.29 (Management of PCBs During Building Demolition Projects)
Prepared by: Shannan Young, Environmental & Sustainability Manager EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The City Council will introduce an ordinance revising Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 7.74 to align with new mandates in the Municipal Regional Stormwater National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit (MRP) issued by the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board. The City Council will also introduce an ordinance revising Dublin Municipal Code Chapter

7.29 to align with new mandates in the MRP related to enhanced best management practices required during complete building demolition of applicable structures.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Take the following actions: 1) Waive the reading and INTRODUCE the Ordinance Amending Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 7.74 (Stormwater Management and Discharge Control); and 2) Waive the reading and INTRODUCE the Ordinance Amending Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 7.29 (Management of PCBs During Building Demolition Projects).

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

Sufficient funds are included in the Fiscal Year 2024-25 and 2025-26 budgets to cover implementation of the requirements in the Municipal Regional Stormwater National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit.
202

Page 2 of 3 ends

DESCRIPTION:

The City of Dublin is a member of the Alameda Countywide Clean Water Program and a copermittee of the Municipal Regional Stormwater National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit (MRP). The MRP is issued by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Francisco Bay Region, approximately every five years and imposes requirements intended to minimize impairments to local creeks and to the San Francisco Bay. The MRP evolved from 1987 amendments to the Federal Clean Water Act, as implemented by Environmental Protection Agency regulations adopted in 1990.

In response to the amendments to the Federal Clean Water Act and to Order No. 91-146 issued by the by California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Francisco Bay Region, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 9-92 on June 8, 1992, which added Chapter 7.74, Stormwater Management and Discharge Control, to the Municipal Code. Since then, requirements mandated in the MRP have expanded and evolved. The proposed Ordinances include revisions to both Chapter 7.74 and Chapter 7.29 of the Municipal Code to conform with current mandates in the MRP. The proposed Ordinances are consistent with a model ordinance developed by the Alameda Countywide Clean Water Program.

Chapter 7.74 Stormwater Management and Discharge Control The proposed Ordinance will modify Chapter 7.74 by: repealing Articles I through IV; replacing those as Articles I, II, IV, and V; adding a new Article III; and renumbering current Articles V and VI as Articles VI and VII. The proposed revisions to Chapter 7.74 are summarized below:
 Adds and updates definitions and references to conform with the MRP and applicable federal and state regulations.
 Updates requirements for implementation of best management practices to prevent wastes and pollutants from entering the municipal storm drain system.  Updates site management requirements pertaining to public and private construction sites and activities, clarifying obligations to implement effective erosion control, run-on and runoff control, sediment control, active treatment systems (as appropriate), good site management, and non-stormwater management through all phases of construction.  Updates development and design requirements pertaining to new and redevelopment projects, clarifying obligations to implement source control, site design, stormwater treatment measures, and hydromodification management measures (as applicable); as well as obligations for applicable projects to enter into maintenance agreements for the perpetual maintenance of these stormwater facilities.
 Adds trash load control measures and actions to reduce trash impacts on the municipal storm drain system and waterways, including those from illicit discharges, illegal dumping, existing development, new development, and redevelopment.  Updates provisions related to inspection, progressive enforcement, and penalties for stormwater violations.
203

Page 3 of 3 ends

The Ordinance includes a new article titled Stormwater Quality Management for Development.

The article includes sections related to construction activities, development and redevelopment requirements, trash reduction requirements, and stormwater management maintenance agreements. Adding this new article, results in renumbering existing Articles III, IV, V, and VI, to Articles IV, V, VI, and VII, respectively.

Other than renumbering, the existing Article V, Dublin Ranch East Side Storm Drain Benefit District and existing Article VI, Dublin Ranch West Side Storm Drain Benefit District, to be Article VI and Article VII respectively, the proposed ordinance does not materially change these articles.

Chapter 7.29 Management of PCBs During Building Demolition Projects Provision C.12 of the MRP, Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) Controls, requires co-permittees to reduce PCBs discharges in stormwater runoff by implementing controls during the building demolition process. On June 4, 2019, City Council adopted Ordinance No. 06-19 requiring applicable structures constructed or remodeled between 1950 and 1980 to assess priority materials that may contain PCBs prior to demolition to determine if said priority materials contain PCBs in concentrations greater than or equal to 50 parts per million. In situations where PCBs are detected at that concentration, the applicant is required to comply with related applicable federal and state laws. The amendments to Chapter 7.29 consist of changes required to enhance clarity and be consistent with noticing and reporting requirements in the current MRP.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

Pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City prepared a Notice of Exemption for the Amendments to the Ordinances.

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

None.

NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:

The City Council Agenda was posted.

ATTACHMENTS:
1) Ordinance Amending Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 7.74 (Stormwater Management and Discharge Control)
2) Exhibit A to the Ordinance – Chapter 7.74 (Stormwater Management and Discharge Control) 3) Ordinance Amending Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 7.29 (Management of PCBs During Building Demolition Projects)
4) Exhibit A to the Ordinance – Chapter 7.29 (Management of PCBs During Building Demolition Projects) – Redline Version
204
Attachment 1
Ord. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 1 of 3 ORDINANCE NO. XX – 24

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
AMENDING DUBLIN MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 7.74 (STORMWATER MANAGEMENT

AND DISCHARGE CONTROL)
WHEREAS, Article XI, Section 7 of the California Constitution provides that a city or county may make and enforce within its limits all local, police, sanitary, and other ordinances and regulations not in conflict with general laws; and
WHEREAS, the City of Dublin (“City”) is subject to the Municipal Regional Stormwater National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit (“MRP”) administered by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Francisco Bay Region (“Regional Water Board”); and WHEREAS, the City’s Stormwater Program is a mandated program under the federal Clean Water Act which is codified in the City of Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 7.74 Stormwater Management and Discharge Control (“Chapter 7.74”); and
WHEREAS, Ordinance 9-92 allowed the City to comply with Section 402(p) of the Clean Water Act as amended by the Water Quality Act of 1987; and WHEREAS, the City is a member of the Alameda Countywide Clean Water Program (“Clean Water Program”), a consortium of Alameda County jurisdictions that coordinate on implementation activities required in the MRP; and
WHEREAS, as a member of the Clean Water Program, the City takes an active role in preventing pollution of San Francisco Bay and other tributaries that flow into the bodies of water that make the City and the Bay Area an attractive place to live; and WHEREAS, the Regional Water Board modified the MRP regulations regarding discharge of stormwater into the stormwater collection system; and WHEREAS, modifications to Chapter 7.74 are required to comply with the provisions of the modified applicable MRP; and
WHEREAS, the City desires to repeal Articles I through IV of the current Chapter 7.74 to reflect the new MRP requirements and to continue to minimize pollution that flows into local waterways and the San Francisco Bay; and
WHEREAS, the City desires to replace Article I through IV of Chapter 7.74 with updated articles modeled on the Clean Water Program’s model ordinance; and WHEREAS, the City desires to add a new Article III to Chapter 7.74, Stormwater Quality Management for Development; and
WHEREAS, the City desires to renumber the current Articles V through VI of Chapter 7.74 as Articles VI and VII, respectively, and to update the references therein. 205
Ord. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 2 of 3 NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Dublin does ordain the changes attached hereto as Exhibit A.

Section 1. Recitals. The above recitals are incorporated as though set forth in this section.

Section 2. Amendment. Articles I through V of Chapter 7.74 “Stormwater Management and Discharge Control” of Title 7 of the Dublin Municipal Code are hereby updated to be in the form of Exhibit A incorporated herein.

Section 3. Renumbering of Articles V and Article VI. Articles V and VI are renumbered VI and VII respectively and the sections within those articles are correspondingly renumbered sequentially to follow the numbering of the last section of Article V added by section 2 of this Ordinance.

Section 4. Severability. If any section, subsection, provision, or part of this Ordinance, or its application to any person or circumstance, is held to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, the remainder of this Ordinance, and the application of such provision to other person or circumstances, shall not be affected thereby and shall remain in full force and effect and, to that end, the provisions of this Ordinance are severable.

Section 5. CEQA. This Ordinance is exempt from the provisions of Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 21100) of Division 13 of the Public Resources Code pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15308 as an action that assures the maintenance, restoration, enhancement or protection of the environment where the regulatory process involves procedures for protection of the environment.

Section 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect and be enforced 30 days following its final adoption.

Section 7. Posting. The City Clerk of the City of Dublin shall cause this Ordinance to be posted in at least three public places in the City of Dublin in accordance with Section 36933 of the Government Code of the State of California.
{Signatures on the following page}
206
Ord. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 3 of 3 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of August 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
______________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________
City Clerk
207
Dublin Municipal Code
Chapter 7.74 Stormwater Management and
Discharge Control
Attachment 2
Exhibit A to the Ordinance
The Dublin Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 2-24, passed June 25, 2024.

Chapter 7.74
Stormwater Management and Discharge Control
Sections:

Article I. Title, Purpose and General Provisions

7.74.010 Title.

7.74.020 Purpose and intent.

7.74.030 Compliance with other laws.

7.74.040 Definitions.

7.74.050 Responsibility for administration.

7.74.060 Construction and application.

7.74.070 Scope and limits of this chapter.

7.74.080 Severability and validity.

Article II. Discharge Regulations and Requirements

7.74.090 Discharge of pollutants.

7.74.100 Exceptions to discharge prohibition.

7.74.110 Discharge in violation of permit.

7.74.120 Illicit discharge and illicit connections.

7.74.130 Reduction of pollutants in stormwater.

7.74.140 Special Districts.

Article III. Stormwater Quality Management for Development

7.74.150 Construction activities.

7.74.160 Development and redevelopment requirements.

7.74.170 Reserved for potential future in-lieu fee.

7.74.180 Trash reduction requirements.

7.74.190 Stormwater Management Maintenance Agreements.

Article IV. Inspection and Enforcement

7.74.200 Authority to inspect.

7.74.210 Violations constituting misdemeanors or infractions.

7.74.220 Penalty for violation.

7.74.230 Continuing violation.

7.74.240 Concealment.

7.74.250 Acts potentially resulting in violation of Federal Clean Water Act and/or Porter-Cologne Act.

7.74.260 Violations deemed a public nuisance.

7.74.270 California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6.

7.74.280 Civil actions.

7.74.290 Administrative enforcement powers.

7.74.300 Authority to issue citations or arrest.

7.74.310 Remedies not exclusive.

Article V. Coordination with other Programs

7.74.320 Coordination with Hazardous Materials Inventory and Response Program. 208
Dublin Municipal Code
Chapter 7.74 Stormwater Management and
Discharge Control
The Dublin Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 2-24, passed June 25, 2024.

7.74.370 Obligations imposed.

7.74.380 Use of credits.

7.74.390 Use of charge revenue.

7.74.400 Recordation.

7.74.410 Reimbursement agreements.

Article I. Title, Purpose and General Provisions

7.74.010 Title.

The ordinance codified in this chapter shall be known as the “City of Dublin Stormwater Management and Discharge Control Ordinance” and may be so cited.

7.74.020 Purpose and intent.

A. The purpose of this chapter is to establish minimum stormwater management requirements and controls to protect and safeguard the general health, safety, and general welfare of city of Dublin citizens by:

1. Eliminating non-stormwater discharges to the municipal separate storm sewer system (hereinafter referred to as MS4);

2. Controlling spills and prohibiting dumping or disposal of materials other than stormwater to the MS4;

3. Reducing pollutants and wastes in stormwater discharges to the maximum extent practicable (hereinafter referred to as MEP);

4. Establishing minimal acceptable requirements for the design of stream buffers and for the protection of the water quality of watercourses, water bodies, the San Francisco Bay, and other significant water resources; and

5. Enabling the city to comply with the California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region Municipal Regional Stormwater National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit (hereinafter referred to as the MRP), , or as amended or revised, NPDES Permit No. CAS612008, or any reissuance thereof, and applicable federal and state regulations. The MRP is on file with the City Clerk of the city of Dublin and available on the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board website.

The intent of this chapter is to protect and enhance the water quality of watercourses, water bodies and wetlands, in a manner pursuant to and consistent with the Clean Water Act and California Water Code.
209
Dublin Municipal Code
Chapter 7.74 Stormwater Management and
Discharge Control
The Dublin Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 2-24, passed June 25, 2024.

7.74.030 Compliance with other laws.

A. The requirements of this chapter are minimum requirements. They do not replace, repeal, abrogate, supersede, or affect any other more stringent requirements, rules, regulations, covenants, standards, or restrictions. Where this chapter imposes requirements that are more protective of human health or the environment than those set forth elsewhere, the provisions of this chapter shall prevail.

B. Approvals and permits granted under this chapter are not waivers of the requirements of any other laws, nor do they indicate compliance with any other laws. Compliance is still required with all applicable federal, state, regional and local laws and regulations, including rules promulgated under authority of this chapter.

7.74.040 Definitions.

A. Any terms defined in the MRP or the Federal Clean Water Act, or the California Water Code and acts amendatory thereof or supplementary thereto, and/or defined in the regulations for the stormwater discharge permitting program issued by the United States Environmental Protection Agency on November 16, 1990 (as may from time to time be amended), as used in this chapter, shall have the same meaning as in that statute or regulations. Specifically, the definitions of the following terms included in that statute or regulations are hereby incorporated by reference, as now applicable or as may hereafter be amended:

1. “Applicant” means any Person applying to the city of Dublin for permitting or approval of a project.

2. “Authorized enforcement official” means the following city officials and their designated associates, employed by the city or working under a contract with the city:

Fire Chief, Public Works Director, City Engineer, and Building Official.

3. “Best management practice (BMP)” means structural device, measures, facility, activity, schedules of activities, prohibitions of practices, general good housekeeping practices, pollution-prevention practices, maintenance procedures, and other management practices to prevent or reduce the discharge of pollutants directly or indirectly to “waters of the United States.” BMPs also include treatment requirements, operating procedures, and practices to control plant-site runoff, spillage or leaks, sludge or waste disposal, or drainage from raw material storage.

4. “Biotreatment Soil Media (BSM)” means a soil blend designed to meet the specifications approved by the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board Executive Officer and incorporated into the C.3 Technical Guidance Manual.

5. “C.3 Technical Guidance Manual” means the most recent version of the Alameda Countywide Clean Water Program manual that sets forth guidance, design standards and best management practices for low impact development. 210
Dublin Municipal Code
Chapter 7.74 Stormwater Management and
Discharge Control
The Dublin Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 2-24, passed June 25, 2024.

6. “City” means the city of Dublin.

7. “Construction activity” means any activity that involves soil disturbing activities including, but not limited to, grubbing, clearing, filling, leveling, building, paving, grading, demolition, and ground disturbances such as stockpiling and excavation unless exempted by the municipal code.

8. “Development” or “development project” means construction, rehabilitation, redevelopment, or reconstruction of any public or private residential project (whether single-family, multi-unit, or planned unit development); or industrial, commercial, or other non-residential project, including public agency projects. Development projects as defined here and used in this chapter includes redevelopment, which means landdisturbing activity that results in the creation, addition, or replacement of exterior impervious surface area on a site on which some past development has occurred.

Development or development project includes, but is not limited to, a rezoning, tentative parcel map, conditional use permit, variance, site development permit, design review, or building permit.

9. “Development runoff requirements” means the provisions in the MRP and any additional city standards that contain performance standards to address both the construction and post-construction phase of new and development projects on stormwater quality.

10. “Discharge” means:
a. Any addition or discharge of any pollutant or combination of pollutants and waste directly or indirectly to the storm drain system or to waters of the United States or waters of the State from any activity or operation, or
b. Any addition of any pollutant, waste, or combination of pollutants and waste directly or indirectly to the storm drain system or to the waters of the contiguous zone or the ocean from any activity or operation other than a vessel or other floating craft being used as a means of transportation.

This includes additions of pollutants or waste to waters of the United States or waters of the State from: surface runoff which is anthropogenically collected or channeled; discharges through pipes, sewers, or other conveyances, including street surfaces and curb and gutters, owned by a State, municipality, or other Person which do not lead to a treatment facility; and discharges through pipes, sewers, or other conveyances, leading to privately owned treatment works.

11. “Discharger” means a Person or entity who or which, respectively, allows, causes, permits to occur, or performs a discharge. “Discharger” also means the owners of real 211
Dublin Municipal Code
Chapter 7.74 Stormwater Management and
Discharge Control
The Dublin Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 2-24, passed June 25, 2024. property on which such activities, operations or facilities are located; provided, however, that a local government or public authority is not a discharger as to activities conducted by others in public rights-of-way

12. “Full trash capture” or a “full trash capture system or device” means any device or series of devices that traps all particles retained by a minimum five-millimeter mesh screen and has a design treatment capacity of not less than the peak flow rate resulting from a one-year, one-hour storm in the tributary drainage catchment area.

13. “Green stormwater infrastructure (GSI)” means infrastructure that uses vegetation, soils, and natural processes to intercept stormwater or stormwater runoff for either infiltration into the ground, evaporation, slowed release into the MS4, or some combination thereof. GSI is a natural and environmentally sustainable approach to managing stormwater runoff using specially designed landscaped areas, pervious surfaces, and rainwater capture and use. As Low Impact Development practices are often implemented with GSI, these concepts are together referred to as LID/GSI.

14. “Hydromodification” means modification of a stream’s hydrograph, caused in general by increases in flows and durations that result when land is developed (e.g., made more impervious). The effects of hydromodification include but are not limited to increased bed and bank erosion, loss of habitat, increased sediment transport and deposition, and increased flooding.

15. “Hydromodification Management (HM)” means engineered systems designed to minimize changes to the hydrograph (hydromodification) resulting from development by matching the flow durations (long-term temporal patterns of volume and rate) of the pre-project runoff.

16. “Illicit connection” means any device or method that conveys an illicit discharge to a MS4 or receiving water, or any conveyance that has not been documented in plans, maps, or equivalent records and approved by the city.

17. “Illicit discharge” means any discharge to the MS4 that is prohibited under local, state, or federal statutes, ordinances, codes, or regulations. This includes all nonstormwater discharges not composed entirely of stormwater, except discharges allowed pursuant to an NPDES permit (other than the NPDES permit for discharges from the MS4).

18. “Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF)” means a voluntary program created by statute which began in 1977 as an investment alternative for California’s local governments and special districts. The LAIF program offers local agencies the opportunity to participate in a major portfolio, which invests hundreds of millions of 212
Dublin Municipal Code
Chapter 7.74 Stormwater Management and
Discharge Control
The Dublin Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 2-24, passed June 25, 2024. dollars, using the investment expertise of the State Treasurer’s Office professional investment staff at no additional cost to the taxpayer.

19.“Low impact development (LID)” uses site design and stormwater management to maintain the site’s pre-development runoff rates and volumes. The goal of LID is to mimic a site’s predevelopment hydrology by using design techniques that infiltrate, filter, store, evaporate, detain, and/or biotreat stormwater runoff on or near the site. At the site scale, GSI is a subset of LID. As LID practices are often implemented with GSI, these concepts are referred together as LID/GSI.

20. “Lot” means a piece or parcel of land owned as a single unit in common ownership, occupied or intended to be occupied by a principal building or a group of such buildings and accessory buildings, or utilized for a principal use and uses accessory thereto, together with such open spaces as are required by this title, and having frontage on and access to an approved and accepted city street that meets the standards of width and improvements as specified in the regulations of the city contained in or adopted pursuant to the subdivision title and street improvement chapter as to the section and the frontage of the lot involved, or having frontage on and access to an approved private street.

21. “Maximum extent practicable (MEP)” means a standard for implementation of stormwater management programs to reduce pollutants in stormwater to the maximum extent possible, taking into account equitable considerations and competing facts including but not limited to the seriousness of the problem, public health risks, environmental benefit, pollutant removal effectiveness, regulatory compliance, cost and technical feasibility.

22. “Municipal Regional Stormwater NPDES Permit (MRP)” means the California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region Municipal Regional Stormwater NPDES permit issued to the city of Dublin, Permit No. CAS612008 and any subsequent amendment, reissuance, or successor to this NPDES permit.

23. “Municipal separate storm sewer system (MS4)” means and includes, but is not limited to, those facilities within the city by which stormwater may be conveyed to waters of the United States, including any roads with drainage systems, municipal streets, catch basins, curbs, gutters, ditches, manmade channels, or storm drains, which are not part of a publicly owned treatment works (POTW) as defined at 40 Code of Federal Regulations Section 122.2.

24. “Non-stormwater discharge” means any discharge that is not entirely composed of stormwater.

25.“NPDES” means National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System. 213
Dublin Municipal Code
Chapter 7.74 Stormwater Management and
Discharge Control
The Dublin Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 2-24, passed June 25, 2024.

26. “NPDES permit” means a NPDES permit issued by the United States Environmental Protection Agency, the State Water Resources Control Board, or a California Regional Water Quality Control Board pursuant to the Clean Water Act and the California Water Code that authorizes discharges to waters of the United States.

27. “Person” means an individual, corporation, partnership, association, State, municipality, commission, political subdivision of a State, or any interstate body.

28. “Pollutant” means dredged soil, solid waste, incinerator residue, filter backwash, sewage, pet wastes, manure, garbage, sewage sludge, munitions, chemical wastes or byproducts, fuels, biological materials, radioactive materials (except those regulated under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2011 et seq.)), heat, wrecked or discarded equipment, sediment, contaminated waste discharged from hot tubs, pools or spas, dumped yard wastes, food related wastes, rock, sand, dirt, and industrial, municipal and agricultural waste discharged into water, or placed in an area or manner such that it could be swept away or carried by stormwater runoff.

29. “Premises” means any building, lot, parcel, real estate, or land or portion of land, whether improved or unimproved, including adjacent sidewalks and parking strips.

30. “Regulated Project” means a development project, as defined in MRP Provision C.3.

These projects are required to implement LID source control, site design, and LID/GSI stormwater treatment, onsite or at a joint stormwater treatment facility, in accordance with the criteria for LID/GSI and numeric sizing for stormwater treatment systems and may be required to implement hydromodification management as put forth in the MRP.

31. “Responsible person” means the owner, occupant, or entity responsible for any premises, or who engages in any activity, from which there is or may be a nonstormwater discharge or any Person who releases pollutants or waste to the MS4.

32. “Source control” means structural or operational BMPs that are intended to prevent pollutants from coming into contact with stormwater through the physical separation of areas or careful management of activities that are sources of pollutants.

33.“State” means the State of California.

34. “Stormwater” means temporary surface water runoff and drainage generated by immediately preceding storms. This definition shall be interpreted consistent with the definition of “stormwater” in Section 122.26 of Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations.

35. “Stormwater treatment system” means any engineered system designed to remove pollutants and waste from stormwater runoff by settling, filtration, biological 214
Dublin Municipal Code
Chapter 7.74 Stormwater Management and
Discharge Control
The Dublin Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 2-24, passed June 25, 2024. degradation, plant uptake, media absorption/adsorption, or other physical, biological, or chemical process. This includes landscape-based systems such as grassy swales and bioretention areas as well as some proprietary treatment systems.

36. “Urban Runoff Requirement Acknowledgement” means the form regarding construction stormwater BMPs that must be completed by developers of projects not required to file a Notice of Intent with the State Water Resources Control Board.

37. “Waste” means sewage and any and all other waste substances, liquid, solid, gaseous, or radioactive, associated with human habitation, or of human or animal origin, or from any producing, manufacturing, or processing operation, including waste placed within containers of whatever nature prior to, and for the purposes of, disposal.

38.“Watercourse” means:
a. An elongated open depression or channel in which water may or does flow; or b. A conduit or channel intended for the conveyance of water whether open or closed; or
c. A stream or course of running water flowing on the earth; or d. A ditch or artificial channel created for the conveyance of water.

39. “Waters of the State” means any surface water or groundwater, including saline waters, within the boundaries of the State.

40. “Waters of the United States” shall have the same meaning as set forth in 40 Code of Federal Regulations Section 120.2 or any successor provisions.

7.74.050 Responsibility for administration.

This chapter shall be administered for the city by the Public Works Director. Where storm drain facilities and/or watercourses have been accepted for maintenance by the Zone 7 Water Agency or other public agency legally responsible for certain watercourses, the responsibility for enforcing the provisions of this chapter may be assigned to such an agency (through contract or agreement executed by the city and such agency) with respect to those watercourses for which they have accepted maintenance.

The Public Works Director is authorized to promulgate administrative procedures and/or policies needed to implement this chapter without having to amend the Ordinance. 215
Dublin Municipal Code
Chapter 7.74 Stormwater Management and
Discharge Control
The Dublin Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 2-24, passed June 25, 2024.

7.74.060 Construction and application.

This chapter shall be construed to assure consistency with the requirements of the Federal Clean Water Act and acts amendatory thereof or supplementary thereto, the California Water Code and applicable implementing regulations, and the MRP and any amendment, revision, or reissuance thereof.

The standards established by this chapter are minimum standards. Therefore, this chapter does not intend nor imply that compliance by any discharger will ensure that the discharger will not cause contamination, pollution, or unauthorized discharge of pollutants or waste into waters of the United States or waters of the State. Ensuring that the discharger does not contaminate, pollute, or otherwise discharge pollutants or waste into the waters of the United States or waters of the State is the ultimate responsibility of the discharger. This chapter shall not create liability on the part of the city or any city agent or employee for any damages that result from the discharger’s reliance on this chapter or any lawful administrative decision made under this chapter.

7.74.070 Scope and limits of this chapter.

A. This chapter shall apply to:

1. Ministerial as well as discretionary approvals of development projects.

2. Dischargers at or from parcels and premises within the city, which have been found to, or may be reasonably considered to, cause or contribute to pollution of stormwater runoff or illegal connections and other illicit discharges.

B. Nothing in this chapter shall be interpreted to infringe any right or power guaranteed by the United States constitution or the California Constitution, including any vested property right.

7.74.080 Severability and validity.

If any portion of the ordinance codified in this chapter is declared invalid, the remaining portions of such ordinance are to be considered valid.

Article II. Discharge Regulations and Requirements

7.74.090 Discharge of pollutants.

A. General Prohibition. Any discharge to the MS4 not composed entirely of stormwater is prohibited, except as set forth in Section 7.74.100.

B. The city has the authority and duty to require any Person intending to connect to the MS4 to adhere to this chapter, the MRP, and any amendment, revision, or reissuance thereof.

C. It is unlawful to throw, deposit, leave, abandon, maintain or keep materials or wastes on public or private lands in a manner and place where they may result in an illicit discharge. 216
Dublin Municipal Code
Chapter 7.74 Stormwater Management and
Discharge Control
The Dublin Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 2-24, passed June 25, 2024.

7.74.100 Exceptions to discharge prohibition.

A. The following discharges are exempt from the prohibitions set forth in Section 7.74.090 above:

1. Any discharge regulated under an NPDES permit issued to the discharger and administered by the state of California under authority of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, provided that the discharger is in full compliance with all requirements of the permit and other applicable laws or regulations.

2. Exempt discharges, as identified in the MRP. Unpolluted discharges from those sources or activities specifically identified in or pursuant to the MRP as exempt discharges, unless they are identified by the city or the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board as a source of pollutants to receiving waters, in which case they shall be addressed as conditionally exempt discharges.

3. Conditionally exempt discharges, as identified in the MRP. Discharges from those sources or activities specifically identified in or pursuant to the MRP as conditionally exempt discharges shall not be a violation of this chapter provided that (1) they are identified by the city or San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board as not being sources of pollutants to receiving waters, or (2) applicable BMPs are developed and implemented to eliminate adverse impacts associated with such sources or activities and required conditions described in the MRP are met prior to the discharge.

B. If the Regional Water Quality Control Board or the city determines that an exempt or conditionally exempt discharge results in or contributes to a violation of the MRP or of any applicable water quality standard for receiving waters, either separately or when combined with other discharges, or is a danger to public health or safety, the authorized enforcement official may give written notice to the Responsible Person that the discharge exemption shall not apply to the discharge at issue following a 10-day period commencing upon delivery of the notice.

Upon expiration of the 10-day period any such discharge shall be unlawful.

7.74.110 Discharge in violation of permit.

A. Any discharge that would result in or contribute to a violation of the MRP, either separately considered or when combined with other discharges, is prohibited. Liability for any such discharge shall be the responsibility of the Person(s) causing or responsible for the discharge, and such Persons shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the city in any administrative or judicial enforcement action relating to such discharge.

B. Every owner of real property within the city shall manage their property in a manner to avoid violation of this code. The property owner shall be liable for violations thereof regardless of any contract or agreement with any third party regarding the property. When there are multiple property owners, the property owners shall have joint and several liability. 217
Dublin Municipal Code
Chapter 7.74 Stormwater Management and
Discharge Control
The Dublin Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 2-24, passed June 25, 2024.

1. Every property owner in the city is required to conduct all activities in a manner to avoid violation of this Code and to correct any nuisance condition.

2. It shall be the duty of every property owner to keep all parcels of land under the property owner’s possession or control free of nuisance conditions.

7.74.120 Illicit discharge and illicit connections.

A. It is prohibited to establish, use, maintain, commence, or continue any illicit drainage connections or illicit discharges to the MS4. This prohibition is expressly retroactive and applies to connections made in the past, regardless of whether made under a permit or other authorization or whether permissible under the law or practices applicable or prevailing at the time of the connection.

1. Any Person responsible for a discharge, spill or pollutant release, including those resulting from activities associated from mobile businesses, shall promptly cease and desist discharging and/or cleanup and abate such a discharge as directed by the authorized enforcement official.

2. Any Person responsible for an illicit connection shall promptly remove the connection as directed by the authorized enforcement official.

3. The city may perform cleanup and abatement work and recover its costs from the responsible Person as provided in Dublin Municipal Code Section 1.04.061. This remedy is in addition to and does not supersede or limit any and all other remedies, both civil and criminal, provided in Article IV and the Dublin Municipal Code.

B. The authorized enforcement official shall have the authority to inspect any activity conducted within the city pursuant to Article IV.

C. When any activity is being performed contrary to the provisions of this code and has the potential to result in a discharge to the MS4, the authorized enforcement official may order the activity stopped until appropriate controls are implemented pursuant to Article IV.

7.74.130 Reduction of pollutants in stormwater.

Any Person engaged in activities that will or may result in pollutants or waste discharges entering the MS4, natural surface waters, or watercourses shall undertake all practicable measures to cease such activities, and/or eliminate or reduce such pollutants and waste discharges. Examples of such activities include, but are not limited to, ownership and use of facilities such as parking lots, gasoline stations, auto services, industrial facilities, and commercial facilities fronting city streets. The following minimal requirements shall apply.

A. Littering.
218
Dublin Municipal Code
Chapter 7.74 Stormwater Management and
Discharge Control
The Dublin Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 2-24, passed June 25, 2024.

1. No Person shall throw, deposit, leave, maintain, keep, or permit to be thrown, deposited, placed, left or maintained, any refuse, rubbish, garbage, or other discarded or abandoned objects, articles, and accumulations, in or upon any street, alley, sidewalk, storm drain inlet, catch basin, conduit or other drainage structure, business place, or upon any public or private lot of land in the city, so that the same might be or become a pollutant or waste discharge, except in lawfully established garbage containers or in lawfully established dumping grounds.

2. No Person shall throw or deposit litter in any fountain, pond, lake, creek, or any other body of water in a park or elsewhere within the city.

B. Standard for maintenance of premises.

1. Persons owning or operating premises shall clean the property and storm drainage structures as frequently and thoroughly as practicable in a manner that does not result in discharge of pollutants or waste to the MS4.

2. The Responsible Person for any business in the city in front of which there is a paved sidewalk shall maintain said sidewalk free of dirt and litter to the maximum extent practicable. Sweepings from said sidewalk shall not be swept or otherwise made or allowed to go into the gutter, roadway, or MS4, but shall be disposed of in receptacles maintained on said real property as required for the disposal of garbage.

3. If wet cleaning is required to maintain the appearance of the sidewalk, parking lot, or other exterior surfaces, the surface cleaning guidelines established by the Alameda Countywide Clean Water Program shall be used.

C. Trash Control

1. An authorized enforcement official may require installation and maintenance of full trash capture device(s) that meet the requirements of the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board on private storm drain inlets if implemented BMPs do not prevent the discharge of trash or other pollutants to the MS4 from private parking lots and drainage facilities.

2. At a minimum, the full trash capture system covering the entirety of the parcel must be installed before the onsite drainage enters the MS4 (i.e., trash capture must take place no farther downstream than the last private stormwater drainage structure on site).

3. The authorized enforcement official may require Persons owning, operating, or maintaining such Premises to enter into an operation and maintenance agreement, in a form approved by the city and which has been recorded against the property with 219
Dublin Municipal Code
Chapter 7.74 Stormwater Management and
Discharge Control
The Dublin Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 2-24, passed June 25, 2024. the Alameda County Recorder’s Office, to ensure perpetual operation and maintenance of the full trash capture system.

4. Upon transferring ownership of the property, any property owner required to install and maintain a full trash capture system shall notify the city in writing of the transfer of ownership, provide the new owners with a copy of the maintenance agreement, and inform the new owners in writing of their obligation to properly operate and maintain the full trash capture system.

5. It shall be unlawful to alter, modify, change, or remove any full trash capture system without first obtaining from the Authorized Enforcement Official written certification that the requirements of this Article and the MRP have been satisfied.

D. Organic matter.

1. Sweeping, blowing, or otherwise causing leaf litter, yard trimmings, or other organic matter in a manner that allows it to enter the MS4 is prohibited.

E. Notice of Intent and compliance with State Water Resources Control Board General Stormwater Permits.

1. Each industrial discharger, discharger associated with construction activity, or other discharger described in any general stormwater permit addressing such discharges as may be adopted by the United States Environmental Protection Agency, the State Water Resources Control Board, or the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board, shall provide Notice of Intent to comply with, and undertake all activities required by any general stormwater permit as applicable to such discharges.

F. Proof of compliance with a general stormwater permit may be required in a form acceptable to the city’s designated representative prior to or as a condition of a subdivision map, site plan, building permit, or development or improvement plan or business license; upon inspection of a facility; during any enforcement proceeding or action; or for any other reasonable cause.

G. Incidental irrigation runoff is the unintended amounts of runoff that leave the area of application such as minimal overspray. Water leaving the intended area of application is not incidental if it is due to the design, excessive application, intentional overflow or application, or inadequate maintenance. Irrigation systems must be designed and maintained to conserve water and prevent water from leaving the area of application. Responsible Persons shall control irrigation systems to prevent excessive irrigation runoff by implementing the following BMPs:

1. Detect and repair leaks from the irrigation system within 72 hours of discovering the leak;
220
Dublin Municipal Code
Chapter 7.74 Stormwater Management and
Discharge Control
The Dublin Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 2-24, passed June 25, 2024.

2. Properly design and aim sprinkler heads to only irrigate the planned application area;

3. Do not irrigate during precipitation events; and

4. Where recycled water is used for irrigation, the user must conform to the requirements set forth in the city’s Municipal Code, Chapter 8.88 Water-Efficient Landscaping Regulations, as amended from time to time, or those given by the MRP, whichever are greater.

H. Best management practices (BMPs) and standards to reduce stormwater and nonstormwater pollutants.

1. Responsibility to implement BMPs. Any Person engaged in activities or operations or owning or occupying facilities or property that will or may result in pollutants entering the MS4 or receiving waters shall implement BMPs to prevent and reduce such pollutants.

I. City may establish BMPs. In addition to BMPs set forth in any general stormwater permit or individual NPDES permit, and notwithstanding the discharge exemptions set forth in Section

7.74.130, the city may establish and require compliance with BMPs for any activity, operation, or facility that may cause or contribute to degradation, pollution, or contamination of stormwater, the MS4, or receiving waters.

J. The Public Works Director may require submission of information to evaluate the implementation and/or require the implementation of BMPs, including, but not limited to, the following:

1. Minimum BMPs. All dischargers must implement and maintain at least the following minimum best management practices: Appropriate BMPs will be implemented to prevent pollutant and waste sources from entering the city’s storm drain collection system that are associated with outdoor process and manufacturing areas, outdoor material storage areas, outdoor waste storage and disposal areas, outdoor vehicle and equipment storage and maintenance areas, outdoor parking and access roads, outdoor wash areas, outdoor drainage from indoor areas, rooftop equipment, contaminated and erodible surfaces, or other sources determined by the Public Works Director to have a reasonable potential to contribute to pollution of stormwater runoff.

2. Inspection, Maintenance, Repair and Upgrading of Best Management Practices. Best management practices at staffed and unstaffed facilities must be inspected and maintained by the discharger according to manufacturer specifications and/or the California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA) Stormwater BMP Handbooks.

These best management practices must be maintained so that they continue to function as designed. Best management practices that fail must be repaired as soon as it is safe to do so. If the failure of a best management practice indicates that the 221
Dublin Municipal Code
Chapter 7.74 Stormwater Management and
Discharge Control
The Dublin Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 2-24, passed June 25, 2024. best management practices in use are inappropriate or inadequate to the circumstances, the practices must be modified or upgraded to prevent any further failure in the same or similar circumstances.

K. Containment and notification of spills.

1. Notwithstanding any other requirement of law, any known or suspected spill or release of pollutants or wastes which result or may result in an illicit discharge into the [Agency] storm drain system, Waters of the United States, or Waters of the State, shall be reported immediately in the following manner by any Responsible Person for a facility or Responsible Person for the facility’s emergency response:
a. The release of a hazardous material or hazardous waste shall be immediately reported to emergency services by emergency dispatch services (911). b. The release of a nonhazardous waste shall be reported to the Public Works Department at 925-833-6630 no later than 5:00 p.m. on the same business day. If the release occurs on a weekend or holiday, notification by phone shall be made on the next business day. A written notification of the release shall also be made to the Public Works Director within five business days of the release.

2. For any discharge subject to the reporting requirements of the State of California Water Code Sections 13271 and 13272, notification in compliance therewith shall constitute sufficient notification for the purposes of this section.

7.74.140 Special Districts.

The city has the authority and duty to require adherence to the MRP by Special Districts, if the Special District intends to connect to the MS4.

Article III. Stormwater Quality Management for Development

7.74.150 Construction activities.

All construction sites shall implement effective erosion control, run-on and runoff control, sediment control, active treatment systems (as appropriate), good site management, and nonstormwater management through all phases of construction (including, but not limited to, demolition, site grading, building and finishing of lots) until the site is fully stabilized by landscaping or the installation of permanent erosion control measures. Construction sites shall conform to the MRP Provision C.6 Construction Site Control requirements, as well as the following requirements:

A. Any Person performing construction activities in the city shall implement appropriate BMPs to prevent the discharge of sediment, construction waste or contaminants from construction materials, tools, and equipment from entering the storm drain system or watercourse. 222
Dublin Municipal Code
Chapter 7.74 Stormwater Management and
Discharge Control
The Dublin Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 2-24, passed June 25, 2024.

B. Any Person performing construction activities for which a city permit is required must submit for review and approval an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan, as described in the Grading Regulations Ordinance, Dublin Municipal Code, Chapter 7.16, Section 7.16.600. Said plan shall also include appropriate BMPs that provide for effective control for other pollutants or waste that may be generated from the site. City permits shall not be issued until an acceptable Erosion and Sediment Control Plan is submitted and approved. All Projects performed in the city must comply with the following provisions:

1. Projects regulated under the State Construction General Permit shall present evidence of coverage under the State Construction General Permit by disclosing the Waste Discharger Identification (WDID) number.

2. Projects not covered by the State Construction General Permit shall complete an Urban Runoff Requirements Acknowledgement, or other equivalent form as available from the city. No construction activity may commence until adequate BMPs have been installed conforming to the State Construction General Permit and/or MRP Provision C.6 Construction Site Control requirements.

C. The Erosion and Sediment Control Plan shall be implemented year-round and must be updated to reflect changing conditions on the project site. Modifications to the Erosion and Sediment Control Plan shall be submitted to the city for review and approval.

D. Ground disturbing activities requiring a permit shall provide signage notifying the public to call the City Public Works Department at (925) 833-6630 for spills or erosion control violations.

The sign shall be at least 18 inches, made of materials that shall withstand weather for the duration of the project, and shall be clearly visible from the right-of-way. Lettering shall be at least 3 inches high and easily readable.

E. The city’s authorized enforcement official shall have the authority to inspect construction activities with the city pursuant to Article IV.

F. When any work is being performed contrary to the provisions of this section, the authorized enforcement official may order the work stopped by notice in writing served on any Persons engaged in doing or causing the work to be done. Such work shall stop until the authorized enforcement official authorizes the work to proceed. This remedy is in addition to and does not supersede or limit any and all other remedies, both civil and criminal provided in the Dublin Municipal Code.

7.74.160 Development and redevelopment requirements.

Development projects shall conform to the MRP Provision C.3 New and Redevelopment Standards, Provision C.6 Construction Site Control requirements, and Provision C.10 Trash Load Reduction Requirements.
223
Dublin Municipal Code
Chapter 7.74 Stormwater Management and
Discharge Control
The Dublin Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 2-24, passed June 25, 2024.

A. Stormwater Source Controls. Source controls as described in the MRP and in further detail in the city of Dublin Stormwater Standard Plans, are required for all development projects doing work in the city. Exemptions from certain stormwater source controls due to extreme hardship may be granted on a limited basis.

B. Site design techniques. Development projects that fall into the applicable thresholds as defined in the MRP, shall incorporate at least one of the following site design techniques, as applicable to the project:

1. Direct roof runoff areas into cisterns or rain barrels for use.

2. Direct roof runoff onto vegetated areas through disconnected roof leaders that are properly located to prevent erosion of landscaped materials.

3. Direct runoff from sidewalks, walkways, patios, driveways, or uncovered parking to vegetated areas.

4. Construct sidewalks, walkways, patios, driveways, uncovered parking, or bike lanes with permeable surfaces as defined in the MRP.

Applicants for these projects shall select, design, and construct these site design measures, as applicable, with the requirements and guidelines set forth in the most current version of following documents:

1. Municipal Regional Stormwater NPDES permit.

2. Technical Guidance Manual.

The above referenced documents, as amended and reissued from time to time, are incorporated by reference into this chapter. These documents shall be available at the city’s or the Alameda Countywide Clean Water Program website.

C. Regulated Projects, as defined in the MRP and Section 7.74.040, are required to incorporate additional site design, stormwater treatment, and hydromodification management measures. These measures are required to remain in place post-construction to address stormwater runoff pollutant discharges and prevent increases in runoff flow rates and volumes.

Applicants for new development and redevelopment projects shall select, design and construct site design, stormwater treatment, and hydromodification management measures, as applicable, to the satisfaction of the city in accordance with the requirements and guidelines set forth in the most current version of following documents:

1. Municipal Regional Stormwater NPDES permit.

2. City of Dublin Stormwater Standard Plans.
224
Dublin Municipal Code
Chapter 7.74 Stormwater Management and
Discharge Control
The Dublin Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 2-24, passed June 25, 2024.

3. C.3 Technical Guidance Manual.

D. Regulated Projects shall include LID/GSI treatment measures, as set forth in the MRP per the following provisions:

1. Project phasing. Project proponents may not phase projects to avoid implementing stormwater requirements. Projects submitted to the city within one year for the same property shall be considered one project in terms of creating or replacing impervious surface area. Project proponents shall meet the applicable requirements based on cumulative impervious surface on the property. In addition, any project, phase of project, or individual lot within a larger previously approved project, shall be considered one project, and must adhere in its entirety to the requirements of this section, as set forth at the time of submittal of the most recent application.

2. Subdivisions of land. Parcels of land which are subdivided for future construction shall make provision for stormwater requirements anticipating future build out. Stormwater improvements shall be considered part of the infrastructure and are required to be installed with other infrastructure improvements.

3. Placement of LID/GSI treatment measures in common areas. In subdivisions, stormwater treatment systems shall be placed in a common area unless prior approval has been obtained by the authorized enforcement official.

4. LID/GSI treatment measures shall not be placed in backyards, or in areas where fencing obstructs access for periodic inspection. All LID/GSI facilities shall be accessible without having to request access through locked areas.

5. Alternative Compliance for low impact development. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 7.74.180, the authorized enforcement official may, in accordance with the MRP, authorize a Regulated Project to provide alternate compliance by treating an equivalent flow and pollutant load of the project’s stormwater runoff with LID/GSI treatment measures at an on-site location that otherwise would not require treatment, or at an offsite location in the same watershed, in accordance with the MRP. The applicant must request approval for use of alternate compliance prior to approval of a tentative subdivision map, or if there is no subdivision map, prior to approval of a building permit for the Regulated Project. In order to request the use of alternate compliance, the applicant must identify the proposed project location, demonstrate to the satisfaction of the authorized enforcement official that the site is appropriate for use as an LID/GSI treatment location, and provide evidence that it has obtained the 225
Dublin Municipal Code
Chapter 7.74 Stormwater Management and
Discharge Control
The Dublin Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 2-24, passed June 25, 2024. rights to use the project location, as necessary, and that the project will be constructed within the time frames specified in the MRP.

6. Construction-phase LID/GSI requirements.
a. Bioretention Soil Media (BSM) certification. For LID/GSI incorporating bioretention, certification of the Bioretention Soil Media (BSM), as set forth in the C.3 Technical Guidance Manual, Appendix K,provided by the supplier. b. GPS Coordinates. Prior to the city granting final certificate of occupancy or acceptance of improvements, the applicant shall provide GPS coordinates for all installed stormwater treatment facilities, hydromodification management measures, and trash capture devices. The coordinates shall be in a format determined in one of two formats:
i. GIS layer (shape file or feature class in a geodatabase): Minimally, provide a GIS point layer of the facility inlet, and ideally provide a GIS polygon layer of facility footprint. Layer(s) should contain the device type, manufacturer, model, and date it was installed.
ii. Excel file (csv or text file) with the information noted above, in addition to a coordinate location pair of Latitude/Longitude or X/Y Coordinates in North American Datum (NAD) 1983 State Plane California III FIPS 0403 Feet, WKID: 2227, Authority: EPSG.

E. Hydromodification management measures.

1. Regulated Projects that are designated as Hydromodification Management projects under the MRP shall demonstrate that the project will not cause an increase in stormwater runoff flow rates, volume, or flow durations over the pre-project existing condition based on the design criteria set forth in the MRP.

2. Hydromodification Management Projects shall implement on-site hydromodification management controls unless a regional hydromodification management control is available to control all or a portion of the project runoff or the project qualifies to use an in-stream alternative hydromodification control measure to control all or a portion of the project runoff.

F. Requirement for Stormwater Management Plan. A Stormwater Management Plan shall consist of a preliminary plan to ensure adequate planning for the management of stormwater runoff and quality control, and a final plan, as approved by a designee of the Public Works Director or City Engineer. Both plans shall be in accordance with the criteria established in the following provisions:
226
Dublin Municipal Code
Chapter 7.74 Stormwater Management and
Discharge Control
The Dublin Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 2-24, passed June 25, 2024.

1. A preliminary Stormwater Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval with all subdivision map, site plan, building permit, or improvement plan applications.

2. The final Stormwater Management Plan must be submitted for review and approval by the Public Works Director or City Engineer as part of the improvement plan review process.

3. All Stormwater Management Plans shall be appropriately sealed and signed by a professional engineer in adherence to all minimum standards and requirements pertaining to the practice of that profession.

4. The stormwater treatment systems must be designed in accordance with the requirements specified in the MRP and with the design guidelines detailed in the most recent C.3 Technical Guidance Manual.

G. Maintenance access easements.

1. The Property Owner must ensure access from the public right-of-way to stormwater treatment facilities, HM systems and full trash capture devices for the purpose of inspection, maintenance, and repair by securing all the maintenance access easements needed on a permanent basis. Such access shall be sufficient for all necessary equipment for maintenance activities. The maintenance access easement must be located such that the stormwater treatment systems are readily accessible for inspection purposes during regular working hours.

H. LID/GSI requirements for projects improving street, sidewalk, or road frontage. Portions of the public right of way that may generate runoff, including sidewalks, curb extensions, pavement replacement, and curb and gutter replacement in the street frontage, that are constructed or reconstructed as part of the Regulated Project are considered part of the Regulated Project.

I. Additional measures. The provisions of this section shall not prohibit an authorized enforcement official from requiring a discharger to take additional measures to achieve the objectives of this chapter or any permit.

7.74.170 Reserved for potential future in-lieu fee.

7.74.180 Trash reduction requirements.

All development projects, including tenant improvement projects, shall conform to the MRP Provision C.10 Trash Load Reduction requirements.

A. Full trash capture systems or devices and actions.
227
Dublin Municipal Code
Chapter 7.74 Stormwater Management and
Discharge Control
The Dublin Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 2-24, passed June 25, 2024.

1. All development projects are required to install on-site full trash capture systems or devices selected from the list of full trash capture systems or multi-benefit trash treatment systems certified by the State Water Board. Alternately, development projects may install regional, off-site full trash capture devices if approved by the city.

2. Full trash capture systems or devices are required to remain in place throughout the life of the development project to reduce trash loads from the MS4. Applicants for development projects shall select, design, and construct full trash capture systems or devices, as applicable, to the satisfaction of the city in accordance with the requirements and guidelines set forth in the most current version of following documents:
a. MRP
b. C.3 Technical Guidance Manual
The above referenced documents, as amended and reissued from time to time, are incorporated by reference into this chapter. These documents shall be available at the city’s or Alameda Countywide Clean Water Program website.

B. If it is infeasible to install full trash captures systems or devices, trash control actions shall be implemented that provide for an equivalent trash reduction.

1. The Applicant must demonstrate to the satisfaction of the city that the trash control programs implemented in lieu of full trash capture devices or systems will provide an equivalent level of trash load reduction. Applicants shall develop and submit a full trash capture equivalency plan to the city for approval. The plan must include the planned trash control actions, projected trash reductions of the actions, implementation schedule, entities responsible for implementing the actions, and the plan to inspect and verify the effectiveness of the actions.

C. Operation and maintenance. Installed full trash capture trash systems or devices shall be operated and maintained by the Responsible Person for the life of the project, following the manufacturer’s recommendations for maintenance.

D. Additional measures. The provisions of this section shall not prohibit an authorized enforcement official from requiring a discharger to take additional measures to achieve the objectives of this chapter or any permit.

7.74.190 Stormwater Management Maintenance Agreements.

A. It is a violation of this code for any landowner to fail to properly operate and maintain any approved full capture trash device, stormwater treatment facilities, hydromodification management facilities and/or source control best management practices on the owner’s 228
Dublin Municipal Code
Chapter 7.74 Stormwater Management and
Discharge Control
The Dublin Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 2-24, passed June 25, 2024. property. Stormwater treatment systems which do not have a Stormwater Management Maintenance Agreement must be maintained as required by the manufacturer’s guidelines and/or to ensure intended functioning of the system(s).

B. Prior to the issuance of any permit for land development activity, development projects required to install full trash capture or LID/GSI systems shall develop and execute a Stormwater Management Maintenance Agreement for the property. The Stormwater Management Maintenance Agreement, also known as the Operation and Maintenance Agreement, shall run with the land, and shall be recorded in the Office of the Alameda County Clerk-Recorder. Provisions in the Stormwater Management Maintenance Agreement are fully enforceable by law. Enforcement action, as detailed in Article IV, may be taken for failure to meet any of the requirements of the Stormwater Management Maintenance Agreement.

C. The Stormwater Management Maintenance Agreement must be entered into between the Property Owner and the city. Responsibility for the operation and maintenance of the stormwater treatment systems shall remain with the Property Owner and shall pass to any successor owner. If portions of the land are sold or otherwise transferred, legally binding arrangements shall be made to pass the inspection and maintenance responsibility to the appropriate successors in title, and notification of the successor must be provided to the city.

D. The Property Owner shall bear responsibility for major repair or replacement of any facilities installed in the public Right-of-Way as a condition of project approval.

E. Maintenance of stormwater treatment systems shall be completed in accordance with the Stormwater Management Maintenance Agreement. The Stormwater Management Maintenance Agreement shall be irrevocable and shall obligate all current and future landowners to bear all costs for the annual maintenance, replacement, and record keeping of all stormwater treatment systems.

F. Site plans and operations and maintenance plans for recording shall show at a minimum:

1. Location of on-site stormwater treatment facilities, HM facilities, and full trash capture systems.

2. Location of off-site/public stormwater treatment facilities, HM facilities, and full trash capture systems.

3. A note to reference any stormwater treatment systems stating: "As part of the original construction of the Development, stormwater treatment systems were installed within the Development in connection with the Development’s drainage system. Neither the Association nor any Responsible Person or Owner shall do any work, construct any improvement, place any landscaping, or otherwise perform any action whatsoever which alters or interferes with the drainage pattern for any Lot or any portion of the 229
Dublin Municipal Code
Chapter 7.74 Stormwater Management and
Discharge Control
The Dublin Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 2-24, passed June 25, 2024.

Common Areas, except to the extent such alteration in drainage pattern is approved in writing by the city of Dublin.”

4. A note to reference the Stormwater Management Maintenance Agreement: “The onsite stormwater treatment systems shall be inspected and maintained as detailed in the Stormwater Management Maintenance Agreement."

5. The extent of watercourse buffer, if any, on the subject property by the parcel’s boundary landmarks and a label of the watercourse buffer.

6. Provide a note to reference any watercourse buffer stating: "There shall be no clearing, grading, construction or disturbance of vegetation except as permitted by the city of Dublin."

7. A note to reference any protective covenants governing all watercourse buffer areas stating: "Any watercourse buffer shown hereon is subject to protective covenants which may be found in the land records and which restrict disturbance and use of these areas."
G. Annual Report. A report of the annual inspection and maintenance activities completed on the stormwater treatment systems shall be submitted to the city by December 30 each year.

The annual inspection report shall include all completed inspection and maintenance forms for the reporting period. The annual inspection shall also include a record of the volume of all accumulated sediment and trash removed from the stormwater treatment systems.

H. Transfer of Property. When a property subject to a Stormwater Management Maintenance Agreement is sold, conveyed, or otherwise transferred to another entity, the Property Owner shall provide written notice of said document to the transferee and provide the city a copy of such notice.

I. Inspection of systems. The authorized enforcement official shall have the authority to inspect stormwater treatment facilities, HM facilities, full trash capture devices and/or source control BMPs pursuant to Article IV.

J. Inadequacy of the system.

1. If a stormwater treatment facility, HM facility, source control BMP, or full trash capture device is found to be inadequate by virtue of physical evidence of operational failure, even though it was built as called for in the approved stormwater management plan, it shall be corrected by the Responsible Person before the development project is finalized and accepted. If the Responsible Person fails to act, the city may use the performance bond to complete the work.
230
Dublin Municipal Code
Chapter 7.74 Stormwater Management and
Discharge Control
The Dublin Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 2-24, passed June 25, 2024.

2. If a stormwater treatment, HM system, or trash capture device or system is found to be inadequate by virtue of physical evidence of operational failure at any point during its operating life, it shall be corrected by the Responsible Person. If the Responsible Person fails to act, the city may pursue corrective actions or enforcement pursuant to Article IV.

Article IV. Inspection and Enforcement

7.74.200 Authority to inspect and sample.

A. General procedures.

1. The authorized enforcement official has authority to conduct inspections related to purposes of implementing this chapter on private or public property. Inspections shall be based upon such reasonable selection processes as may be deemed necessary to carry out the objectives of the chapter, including, but not limited to, visual evidence of an actual or potential violation of any provision of this chapter, complaints received, knowledge or physical evidence of subject activities or other pollutant sources and waste discharges, routine inspections, random sampling, sampling in areas with evidence of stormwater pollution, contamination, illicit connections, discharge of nonstormwater.

2. The authorized enforcement official may enter such building or premises at all reasonable times to inspect the same, to inspect and copy records related to stormwater compliance, take measurements, or perform any duty imposed upon the official by this chapter; provided that:
a. If such building or premises is occupied, the authorized enforcement official shall first present proper credentials and request entry; and b. If such building or premises is unoccupied, the authorized enforcement official shall first make a reasonable effort to locate the owner or other Responsible Person having charge or control of the building or premises and request entry.

3. Any such request for entry shall state that the property owner or Responsible Person has the right to refuse entry and that, in the event such entry is refused, inspection may be made only upon issuance of a search warrant by a duly authorized magistrate.

In the event the owner or Responsible Person refuses entry after such request has been made, or in the event that the owner or Responsible Person for the building or premises cannot be located, an inspection/abatement warrant authorizing entry shall be obtained prior to the city’s entry onto the building or premises. The official is hereby empowered to seek assistance from any court of competent jurisdiction in obtaining such warrant authorizing entry.
231
Dublin Municipal Code
Chapter 7.74 Stormwater Management and
Discharge Control
The Dublin Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 2-24, passed June 25, 2024.

4. Routine or area inspections shall be based upon such reasonable selection processes as may be deemed necessary to carry out the objectives of this chapter, including but not limited to random sampling and/or sampling in areas with evidence of stormwater contamination, illicit discharges, discharge of non-stormwater to the stormwater system, or similar factors.

5. Inspections deemed necessary to carry out the objectives of this chapter shall be subject to an inspection fee, consistent with the city’s current Fee Schedule for these specific activities.

B. Authority to Sample and Establish Sampling Devices. The city shall have the right to establish on any property such devices as are necessary to conduct sampling or metering operations. During all inspections as provided herein, the authorized enforcement official may take any samples deemed necessary to aid in the pursuit of the inquiry or in the recordation of the activities on-site.

C. Notification of Spills. As soon as any Person in charge of a facility or responsible for emergency response for a facility has knowledge of any confirmed or unconfirmed release of materials, pollutants or wastes which may result in pollutants or non-stormwater discharges entering the MS4, such Person shall take all necessary steps to ensure the discovery and containment and cleanup of such release, and shall notify the city of the occurrence by contacting the City Public Works Department at (925) 833-6630 during regular working hours and confirming the notification by correspondence to the same. After regular working hours, provide notification of spills by contacting the City of Dublin Fire Department Dispatch at 925- 447-4257.

D. Follow-Up Action. In accordance with Section 9 and Section 13, and following city inspection, the city may require that any Person in charge of a facility or responsible for emergency response for a facility that has knowledge of any confirmed or unconfirmed release of materials, pollutants or waste which may result in pollutants or non-stormwater discharges entering the MS4, take appropriate action to prevent discharge of pollutants or wastes, including, but not limited to, implementation of appropriate BMPs, as described in Section

7.74.140, and/or installation of full trash capture systems or devices.

E. Requirement to Test or Monitor. An authorized enforcement official may request that any Person engaged in any activity and/or owning or operating any facility which may cause or contribute to stormwater pollution or contamination, illicit discharges, and/or discharge of nonstormwater to the stormwater system, undertake such monitoring activities and/or analyses and furnish such reports as the official may specify. The burden, including costs of these activities shall be borne by the Person. The requested analyses and reports shall bear a reasonable relationship to the need for the monitoring, analyses and reports and the benefits 232
Dublin Municipal Code
Chapter 7.74 Stormwater Management and
Discharge Control
The Dublin Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 2-24, passed June 25, 2024. to be obtained. The recipient of such request shall undertake and provide the monitoring, analyses and/or reports requested.

7.74.210 Violations constituting misdemeanors or infractions.

Unless otherwise specified by ordinance, the violation of any provision of this chapter, or failure to comply with any of the mandatory requirements of this chapter, shall constitute a misdemeanor; except that, notwithstanding any other provisions of this chapter, any such violation constituting a misdemeanor under this chapter may, in the discretion of the city, be charged and prosecuted as an infraction.

7.74.220 Penalty for violation.

A. Upon conviction of a misdemeanor, a Person shall be subject to payment of a fine, or imprisonment, or both, not to exceed the limits set forth in California Government Code Section 36901.

B. Upon conviction of an infraction, a Person shall be subject to payment of a fine, not to exceed the limits set forth in California Government Code Section 36900. After a third infraction conviction for a violation of the same provision within a twelve (12) month period, subsequent violations of that same provision within a twelve (12) month period may be charged as a misdemeanor.

7.74.230 Continuing violation.

Unless otherwise provided, a Person shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day during any portion of which a violation of this chapter is committed, continued or permitted by the Person, shall be punishable accordingly as herein provided.

7.74.240 Concealment.

Causing, permitting, aiding, abetting, or concealing a violation of any provision of this chapter shall constitute a violation of such provision.

7.74.250 Acts potentially resulting in violation of Federal Clean Water Act and/or PorterCologne Act.

Any Person who violates any provision of this chapter, any provision of any permit issued pursuant to this chapter, or who discharges waste or wastewater which causes pollution, or who violates any cease and desist order, prohibition, or effluent limitation, may also be in violation of the Federal Clean Water Act and/or Porter-Cologne Act and may be subject to the sanctions of those Acts, including civil and criminal penalty. Any enforcement action authorized under this code may also include notice to the violator of such potential liability.

7.74.260 Violations deemed a public nuisance.

A. In addition to the penalties hereinbefore provided, any condition caused or permitted to exist in violation of any of the provisions of this chapter is a threat to the public health, safety, and welfare, and is declared and deemed a public nuisance. Such condition may be summarily 233
Dublin Municipal Code
Chapter 7.74 Stormwater Management and
Discharge Control
The Dublin Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 2-24, passed June 25, 2024. abated and/or restored by any authorized enforcement official pursuant to Chapter 5.64 of the Dublin Municipal Code, and/or civil action to abate, enjoin or otherwise compel the cessation of such nuisance may be taken by the City Attorney.

B. The cost of such abatement and restoration shall be borne by the Responsible Person for the property, and the cost thereof shall be a lien upon and against the property. The procedures of Article IV, Chapter 5.64 of the Dublin Municipal Code shall be followed for any such lien.

C. If violation of this chapter constitutes a seasonal and recurrent nuisance, the City Council shall so declare. Thereafter, such seasonal and recurrent nuisance shall be abated every year without the necessity of any further hearing.

7.74.270 California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6.

The provisions of Section 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure are applicable to judicial review of city decisions pursuant to this chapter.

7.74.280 Civil actions.

In addition to any other remedies provided in this chapter, any violation of this chapter may be enforced by civil action brought by the city. In any such action, the city may seek, and the court shall grant, as appropriate, any or all of the following remedies:

A. A temporary and/or permanent injunction;
B. Assessment of the violator for the costs of any investigation, inspection or monitoring survey that led to the establishment of the violation, and for the reasonable costs of preparing and bringing legal action under this subsection;
C. Costs incurred in removing, correcting or terminating the adverse effects resulting from the violation;
D. Compensatory damages for loss or destruction to water quality, wildlife, fish, and aquatic life. Assessments under this subsection shall be paid to the city to be used exclusively for costs associated with monitoring and establishing stormwater discharge pollution control systems and/or implementing or enforcing the provisions of this chapter.

7.74.290 Administrative enforcement powers.

In addition to the other enforcement powers and remedies established by this chapter, an authorized enforcement official has the authority to utilize the applicable administrative remedies set forth in Dublin Municipal Code, Chapter 1.06 Administrative Citations, in addition to any or all of the following that apply:

A. Cease and Desist Orders. When an authorized enforcement official finds that a discharge has taken place or is likely to take place in violation of this chapter, the official may issue an 234
Dublin Municipal Code
Chapter 7.74 Stormwater Management and
Discharge Control
The Dublin Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 2-24, passed June 25, 2024. order to cease and desist such discharge, or practice, or operation likely to cause such discharge and direct that those Persons not complying shall: (1) comply with the requirement, (2) comply with a time schedule for compliance, and/or (3) take appropriate remedial or preventive action to prevent the violation from recurring.

B. Notice to Clean and Abate. Whenever an authorized enforcement official finds any oil, earth, dirt, grass, weeds, dead trees, cans, rubbish, refuse, waste, or any other material of any kind, in or upon the sidewalk abutting or adjoining any parcel of land, or upon any parcel of land or grounds, which may result in an increase in pollutants or wastes entering the MS4 or a nonstormwater discharge to the MS4, the official may give notice to the Responsible Person and/or to the tenant, if any, to remove such oil, earth, dirt, grass, weeds, dead trees, cans, rubbish, refuse, waste or other material, in any manner that he or she may reasonably provide.

The recipient of such notice shall undertake the activities as described in the notice.

C. Verbal Warning or Written Warning. When an authorized enforcement official finds that a Discharger has violated, or continues to violate, any provision of this chapter, or order issued hereunder, or any other stormwater standards or requirement, the authorized enforcement official may serve upon that Discharger a verbal or written warning notice or notice of violation.

The notice includes required corrective actions to occur within a reasonably short and expedient time frame commensurate with the threat to water quality.

D. Stop Work Order. Whenever an authorized enforcement official finds that a Discharger has performed work contrary to the provisions of this section, the authorized enforcement official may order the work stopped by notice in writing served on any Persons engaged in doing or causing the work to be done. Such work shall stop until the authorized enforcement official authorizes the work to proceed.

E. Withholding plan approvals or permits. Whenever an authorized enforcement official finds that a Discharger has performed work contrary to the provisions of this section the city may withhold the issuance of approvals or permits for ongoing or continued work at the property.

Such actions by the city may include, but are not limited withholding final certificate of occupancy or acceptance of improvements until the violation has been corrected

7.74.300 Authority to issue citations or arrest.

A. Authorized enforcement officials may issue a citation for an infraction and notice to appear in the manner prescribed by Chapter 5c of Title 3, Part 2 of the Penal Code, or as the same may hereafter be amended. It is the intent of the City Council that the immunities prescribed in Section 836.5 of the Penal Code be applicable to public officers or employees or employees acting in the course and scope of employment pursuant to this chapter.

B. Police officers, but not authorized enforcement officials, shall have and are hereby vested with the authority to arrest or cite any Person who violates any section of this chapter in the manner provided by the California Penal Code for the arrest or release on citation of 235
Dublin Municipal Code
Chapter 7.74 Stormwater Management and
Discharge Control
The Dublin Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 2-24, passed June 25, 2024. misdemeanor infractions as prescribed by Chapter 5, 5c, and 5d of Title 3, Part 2 of the Penal Code, or as the same may be hereinafter amended.

7.74.310 Remedies not exclusive.

Remedies under this article are in addition to and do not supersede or limit any and all other remedies, civil or criminal. The remedies provided for herein shall be cumulative and not exclusive.

Article V. Coordination with Other Programs

7.74.320 Coordination with Hazardous Materials Inventory and Response Program.

The first revision of the business plan for any facility subject to the city’s Hazardous Materials Inventory and Response Program shall include a program for compliance with this chapter, including the prohibitions on non-stormwater discharges and illicit discharges, and the requirement to reduce the discharge of pollutants or wastes to the maximum extent practicable.
236
Attachment 3
Ord. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 1 of 2 ORDINANCE NO. XX – 24

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
AMENDING DUBLIN MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 7.29 (MANAGEMENT OF PCBs DURING

BUILDING DEMOLITION PROJECTS)
WHEREAS, City Staff identified updates to the City of Dublin Municipal Code, Chapter 7.29 Management of PCBs During Building Demolition Projects (“Chapter 7.29”) that reflect new regulatory requirements and would reduce stormwater pollution; and WHEREAS, building demolition is a significant source of polychlorinated biphenyls (“PCBs”), a toxic and pervasive chemical, in urban stormwater and stormwater is the largest identified source of PCBs flowing into the San Francisco Bay; and WHEREAS, the Municipal Regional Stormwater National Pollution Discharge Elimination System Permit (“MRP”), of which the City of Dublin is a co-permittee, requires permittees to manage PCBs-containing materials during building demolition; and WHEREAS, the Bay Area Stormwater Management Agencies Association developed a model ordinance (“Model Ordinance”) to assist permittees in managing PCBs during building demolition and to effectuate a significant PCB load reduction; and WHEREAS, the Model Ordinance targets priority building materials including caulking, thermal/fiberglass insulation, adhesive/mastic, and rubber window gaskets, that may contain relatively high levels of PCBs, especially in buildings constructed between 1950 and 1980; and WHEREAS, the City of Dublin desires to amend Chapter 7.29 to meet new requirements in the MRP and to reduce PCBs in stormwater runoff originating in the City of Dublin.

NOW, THEREFORE, The City Council of the City of Dublin does ordain the changes attached hereto as Exhibit A.

Section 1. Recitals. The above recitals are incorporated as though set forth in this section.

Section 2. Amendment. Chapter 7.29 is hereby amended as set forth in Exhibit A incorporated herein.

Section 3. Severability. If any section, subsection, provision, or part of this Ordinance, or its application to any person or circumstance, is held to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, the remainder of this Ordinance, and the application of such provision to other person or circumstances, shall not be affected thereby and shall remain in full force and effect and, to that end, the provisions of this Ordinance are severable.

Section 4. CEQA. This Ordinance is exempt from the provisions of Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 21100) of Division 13 of the Public Resources Code pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15308 as an action that assures the maintenance, restoration, enhancement 237
Ord. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 2 of 2 or protection of the environment where the regulatory process involves procedures for protection of the environment.

Section 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect and be enforced 30 days following its final adoption.

Section 6. Posting. The City Clerk of the City of Dublin shall cause this Ordinance to be posted in at least three public places in the City of Dublin in accordance with Section 36933 of the Government Code of the State of California.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of August 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
______________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________
City Clerk
238
Dublin Municipal Code
Chapter 7.29 MANAGEMENT OF PCBs DURING

BUILDING DEMOLITION PROJECTS
Attachment 4
Exhibit A to the Ordinance
The Dublin Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 2-24, passed June 25, 2024.

Chapter 7.29
Management of PCBs During Building Demolition Projects
Sections:

Section 7.29.010. Purpose.

Section 7.29.020. Definitions.

Section 7.29.030. Applicability.

Section 7.29.040. Exemptions.

Section 7.29.050. PCBs in Priority Building Materials Screening Assessment.

Section 7.29.060. Agency notification, abatement, and disposal for identified PCBs.

Section 7.29.070. Compliance with California and federal PCBs laws and regulations.

Section 7.29.080. Information submission and applicant certification.

Section 7.29.090. Recordkeeping.

Section 7.29.100. Obligation to notify city of Dublin of changes.

Section 7.29.110. Liability.

Section 7.29.120. Enforcement.

Section 7.29.130. Fees.

Section 7.29.140. City projects.

7.29.010. Purpose.

A. The provisions of this chapter shall be construed to accomplish the following purposes:

1. Require building demolition permit applicants (applicants) to conduct a PCBs in priority building materials screening assessment and submit information documenting the results of the screening. Such documentation to include: (a) the results of a determination whether the building proposed for demolition is high priority for PCBscontaining building materials based on the structure age, use, and construction; (b) the concentration of PCBs in each priority building material present; (c) for each priority building material present with a PCBs concentration equal to or greater than fifty (50) ppm, the approximate amount (linear feet or square feet) of that material in the building; and (d) provide evidence to the city of Dublin that PCBs in demolished buildings are properly managed to minimize transport to the municipal separate storm sewer system by obtaining and providing to the city official documentation of said disposal.

2. Inform applicants with PCBs present in one (1) or more of the priority building materials (based on the above screening assessment) that they must comply with all related applicable federal and state laws. This may include reporting to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board 239
Dublin Municipal Code
Chapter 7.29 MANAGEMENT OF PCBs DURING

BUILDING DEMOLITION PROJECTS
The Dublin Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 2-24, passed June 25, 2024. (Regional Water Board), and/or the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). Additional sampling for and abatement of PCBs may be required.

3. Meet the requirements of the Federal Clean Water Act, the California Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act, and the Municipal Regional Stormwater National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit Order No. R2-2015-00492022-0018 (MRP), and any and all subsequent amendments, reissuances, or successor to this NPDES permit.

B. The requirements of this chapter do not replace or supplant the requirements of California or federal law, including but not limited to the Toxic Substances Control Act, 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 761, and California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 22.

7.29.020. Definitions.

In addition to the general definitions applicable to this code, whenever used in this chapter, the following terms shall have the meanings set forth below:

A. “Applicable structure” means buildings constructed or remodeled from January 1, 1950, to December 31, 1980. Remodeling, partial building, wood framed structure, and single-family residence demolition projects are exempt.

B. “Applicant” means a person applying for a building demolition permit as required by Chapter

7.28. C. “Appropriate authority” means the building official or designee of the city of Dublin.

D. “Building” means a structure with a roof and walls standing more or less permanently in one (1) place. Buildings are intended for human habitation or occupancy.

E. “Demolition” means the wrecking, razing, or tearing down of any structure. This definition is intended to be consistent with the demolition activities undertaken by contractors with a C-21 building moving/demolition contractor’s license.

F. “DTSC” means the state of California Department of Toxic Substances Control.

G. “EPA” means the United States Environmental Protection Agency.

H. “PCBs” means polychlorinated biphenyls.

I. “PCBs in priority building materials screening assessment” means the two-step process used to: (1) determine whether the building proposed for demolition is high priority for PCBscontaining building materials based on the structure age, use, and construction; and if so, (2) determine the concentrations (if any) of PCBs in priority building materials revealed through existing information or representative sampling and chemical analysis of the priority building materials in the building. Directions for this process are provided in the priority building materials screening assessment applicant package.
240
Dublin Municipal Code
Chapter 7.29 MANAGEMENT OF PCBs DURING

BUILDING DEMOLITION PROJECTS
The Dublin Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 2-24, passed June 25, 2024.

J. “Priority building materials” means the following:

1. Caulking, e.g., around windows and doors, at structure/walkway interfaces, and in expansion joints;

2. Thermal/fiberglass insulation, e.g., around HVAC systems, around heaters, around boilers, around heated transfer piping, and inside walls or crawlspaces;

3. Adhesive/mastic, e.g., below carpet and floor tiles, under roofing materials, and under flashing; and

4. Rubber window gaskets, e.g., used in lieu of caulking to seal around windows in steelframed buildings.

K. “Priority building materials screening assessment applicant package” (applicant package) means a document package that includes an overview of the screening process, applicant instructions, a process flow chart, a screening assessment form, and the Protocol for Evaluating Priority PCBs-Containing Materials before Building Demolition (BASMAA 2018, prepared for the Bay Area Stormwater Management Agencies Association, August 2018, and any subsequent revisions thereof intended to address requirements in successor NPDES permits).

L. “Regional Water Board” means the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Francisco Bay Region.

M. “Remodel” means to make significant finish and/or structural changes that increase utility and appeal through complete replacement and/or expansion. A removed area reflects fundamental changes that include multiple alterations. These alterations may include some or all of the following: replacement of a major component (cabinet(s), bathtub, or bathroom tile); relocation of plumbing/gas fixtures/appliances; or significant structural alterations (relocating walls, and/or the addition of square footage).

7.29.030. Applicability.

This chapter applies to applicants for buildings constructed or remodeled from January 1, 1950, to December 31, 1980.

7.29.040. Exemptions.

Applications for remodeling, partial building wood framed structure, and single-family residence demolition projects are exempt.

7.29.050. PCBs in Priority Building Materials Screening Assessment.

Every applicant for a building demolition permit shall conduct a PCBs in priority building materials screening assessment, which is a two (2) step process requires:
241
Dublin Municipal Code
Chapter 7.29 MANAGEMENT OF PCBs DURING

BUILDING DEMOLITION PROJECTS
The Dublin Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 2-24, passed June 25, 2024.

A. An assessment to Ddetermine whether the building proposed for demolition is high priority for PCBs-containing materials based on the structure age, use, and construction (i.e., whether the building is an applicable structure); and if so, B. Demonstrate Demonstration of the presence or absence and concentration of PCBs in priority building materials through existing information or representative sampling and chemical analysis of the priority building materials in the building;.and, C. Official documentation shall be provided to the City by the applicant demonstrating that priority building materials with PCBs concentrations equal to or greater than 50 ppm in demolished applicable structures are disposed of appropriately and according to state and federal regulations; and
D. Enhanced construction site best management practices during the demolition process to minimize migration of PCBs into the municipal separate storm sewer system shall be implemented by the applicant. Enhanced construction site best management practices include the following:

1. Inspections of demolition projects during the dry season (May 1 through September 30 of a given year);

2. Additional wet season inspections, as necessary (beyond the once per month minimum required by the MRP);

3. Street sweeping required daily throughout demolition and construction activities; and

4. Cover demolition debris with an impermeable liner until debris is removed from the project site.

Applicants shall follow the directions provided in the PCBs in priority building materials screening assessment applicant package (applicant package), which includes an overview of the process, applicant instructions, a process flow chart, a screening assessment form, and the Protocol for Assessing Priority PCBs-Containing Materials before Building Demolition. Per the applicant package, for certain types of buildings built within a specified date range, the applicant must conduct further assessment to determine whether or not PCBs are present at concentrations greater than or equal to fifty (50) parts-per million. This determination is made via existing data on specific product formulations (if available), or, more likely, via conducting representative sampling of the priority building materials and analyzing the samples for PCBs at a certified analytical laboratory. Any representative sampling and analysis must be conducted in accordance with the Protocol for Assessing Priority PCBs-Containing Materials before Building Demolition. The applicant package provides additional details. 242
Dublin Municipal Code
Chapter 7.29 MANAGEMENT OF PCBs DURING

BUILDING DEMOLITION PROJECTS
The Dublin Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 2-24, passed June 25, 2024.

7.29.060. Agency notification, abatement, and disposal for identified PCBs.

When the PCBs in priority building materials screening assessment identifies one or more priority building materials with PCBs, the applicant must comply with all related applicable federal and state laws, including potential notification of the appropriate regulatory agencies, including the EPA, the Regional Water Board, and/or the DTSC. Agency contacts are provided in the applicant package. Additional sampling for and abatement of PCBs may be required.

Depending on the approach for sampling and removing building materials containing PCBs, the applicant may need to notify or seek advance approval from the EPA before building demolition. Even in circumstances where advance notification to or approval from the EPA is not required before the demolition activity, the disposal of PCBs waste is regulated under Toxic Substances Control Act. Additionally, the disposal of PCBs waste is subject to California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 22 Section 66262. Official documentation shall be provided to the city of Dublin demonstrating proper disposal of PCBs containing building materials.

7.29.070. Compliance with California and federal PCBs laws and regulations.

Applicants must comply with all federal and California laws and regulations, including but not limited to health, safety, and environmental laws and regulations, that relate to management and cleanup of any and all PCBs, including but not limited to PCBs in priority building materials, other PCBs-contaminated materials, PCBs-contaminated liquids, and PCBs waste.

7.29.080. Information submission and applicant certification.

A. The applicant shall conduct a PCBs in priority building materials screening assessment and submit the associated information and results as part of the building demolition permit application, including the following:

1. Owner and project information, including location, year building was built, description of building construction type, and anticipated demolition date.

2. Determination of whether the building proposed for demolition is high priority for PCBscontaining building materials based on the structure age, use, and construction.

3. If high priority for PCBs-containing building materials based on the structure age, use, and construction, the concentration of PCBs in each priority building material present. If PCBs concentrations are determined via representative sampling and analysis, include a contractor’s report documenting the assessment which includes the completed quality assurance/quality control checklist from the Protocol for Assessing Priority PCBsContaining Materials before Building Demolition and the analytical laboratory reports.

4. For each priority building material present with a PCBs concentration equal to or greater than fifty (50) parts-per million, the approximate amount (linear feet or square feet) of that material in the building.
243
Dublin Municipal Code
Chapter 7.29 MANAGEMENT OF PCBs DURING

BUILDING DEMOLITION PROJECTS
The Dublin Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 2-24, passed June 25, 2024.

B. Applicant’s certification of the accuracy of the information submitted. The appropriate authority may specify a format or guidance for the submission of the information.

7.29.090. Recordkeeping.

Those applicants conducting a building demolition project must maintain documentation of the results of the PCBs in priority building materials screening assessment for a minimum of five (5) years after submittal.

7.29.100. Obligation to notify city of Dublin of changes.

The applicant shall submit written notifications documenting any changes in the information submitted in compliance with this chapter.

The applicant shall submit the revised information to the appropriate authority when changes in project conditions affect the information submitted with the permit application.

7.29.110. Liability.

The applicant is responsible for safely and legally complying with the requirements of this chapter. Neither the issuance of a permit under the requirements of Chapter 7.28, nor the compliance with the requirements of this chapter or with any condition imposed by the issuing authority, shall relieve any person from responsibility for damage to persons or property resulting therefrom, or as otherwise imposed by law, nor impose any liability upon the city of Dublin for damages to persons or property.

7.29.120. Enforcement.

Failure to submit the information required in this chapter or submittal of false information will result in enforcement under Section 1.04.030.

7.29.130. Fees.

In addition to the fees required under Chapter 7.28, all applicants subject to this chapter shall deposit funds with the city of Dublin, and pay a fee based upon the fee schedule in effect at the time of the issuance of the demolition permit.

7.29.140. City Projects.

City of Dublin departments shall comply with all the requirements of this chapter except they shall not be required to obtain permits and approvals under this chapter for work performed within city of Dublin-owned properties and areas, such as rights-of-way. 244

STAFF REPORT

CITY COUNCIL

Page 1 of 4 ends

Agenda Item 5.10
DATE: August 20, 2024
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Linda Smith, City Manager
SUBJECT: City Treasurer's Informational Report of Investments for the Quarter Ending June 30, 2024
Prepared by: Chris Rhoades, Financial Analyst
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The City Council will receive an informational report of the City’s investments through the quarter ending June 30, 2024 including a monthly transaction ledger. The City’s investment portfolio for this period totaled $435,147,967 (market value) with an average market yield of 4.98%. As required by the Policy, the City Treasurer (Finance Director) affirms that the City is able to meet its expenditure requirements for the next six months.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Receive the City Treasurer's Informational Report of Investments for the Quarter Ending June 30, 2024.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

There is no financial impact resulting from this report. Investments are made in accordance with the City Investment Policy and State Law. Interest earned is apportioned between funds (i.e., General Fund, Gas Tax Fund, etc.) based upon their proportionate share of the total cash balance.

Based on the financial needs of the City including the timing of revenues and expenditures, the quarterly cash balance can vary from quarter to quarter.

DESCRIPTION:

The total investment portfolio (market value) consists of $293,298,557 managed by Chandler Asset Management (Chandler), and $141,849,410 invested by the City in local government pools, the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) and the California Asset Management Program (CAMP).

The average market yield of the Chandler portfolio and the local pools was 4.84% and 5.26% respectively.
245

Page 2 of 4 ends

The total investment portfolio balance fluctuates throughout the year due to normal cash flow needs and includes both discretionary and restricted funds.

Economic Update Highlights
The following are some highlights from the Economic Update included in the Investment Report prepared by Chandler (Attachment 1).

Recent economic data suggests positive but slower growth this year fueled by consumer spending.

While the consumer has been resilient, growing credit card debt, higher delinquencies, and a moderating labor market pose potential headwinds to future economic growth. Inflationary trends are subsiding, but core levels remain above the Fed’s target. Given the cumulative effects of restrictive monetary policy and tighter financial conditions, Chandler believes the economy will gradually soften and the Fed will loosen monetary policy in 2024.

City of Dublin Portfolio
The City's aggregate portfolio has maintained a healthy balance of investment types with minimal change from the prior quarter.

The market value of the City's portfolio increased by $12.8 million from the March 31, 2024 quarter. The quarterly change results from the normal fluctuations in the timing of incoming revenue, predominantly the receipt of property tax (the City receives the second of two annual payments in the fourth quarter), and expenditures on capital projects as well as payments to Alameda County for Police and Fire Services. The City’s portfolio increased by $34.04 million from the same quarter the prior year (see Table 1 below). Overall market yield-to-maturity has increased to 4.98%, (shown in Table 2) due to the factors discussed in the Economic Update Highlights. For detailed monthly transactions, see Attachment 2. 246

Page 3 of 4 ends

Table 1: Portfolio Values and Yield to Maturity
1Includes cash on hand, receivables, payables and accrued interest from the Local Pools. (effective March 2024)
2Accrued Interest from Local Pools shown in Cash. (effective March 2024) 3Includes cash on hand, receivables and payables from accounts managed by Chandler. (effective March 2024)
4CMO is retitled to Agency CMBS. (effective March 2024) Table 2: Quarterly Holdings (Market Value) by Type, and YTM, 5 Quarters 1Includes cash on hand, receivables, payables, from accounts managed by Chandler and the Local Pools, and accrued interest from the Local Pools. (effective March 2024) 2CMO is retitled to Agency CMBS. (effective March 2024) June 30, 2023 March 31, 2024
Holdings
Market
Value
Market
Value
Par
Value
Book
Value
Market
Value
% of
Subtotal
% of Total
Portfolio
Book
Yield
Market
Yield
Managed by City
Cash1 274,480 293,969 293,969 293,969 0.2% 0.1% 0.00% 0.00% LAIF 26,092,229 26,800,793 27,087,153 27,087,153 27,087,153 19.1% 6.1% 4.56% 4.56% CAMP 94,675,879 104,531,281 114,468,288 114,468,288 114,468,288 80.7% 25.9% 5.44% 5.44% SUBTOTAL 120,768,108 131,606,553 141,849,410 141,849,410 141,849,410 100.00% 32.14% 5.26% 5.26% Accrued Interest2 195,897 - -
120,964,005 131,606,553 141,849,410
Managed by Chandler
ABS 28,186,820 27,628,978 31,294,642 31,291,134 31,133,561 10.7% 7.1% 4.54% 5.19% Agency 53,795,750 39,102,074 30,620,000 30,696,639 29,682,071 10.2% 6.9% 1.94% 4.96% Cash3 456,482 448,879 448,879 448,879 0.2% 0.1% 0.00% 0.00% Agency CMBS4 6,570,900 8,630,360 8,808,354 8,730,912 8,540,328 2.9% 2.0% 3.16% 5.05% Money Market 2,641,554 813,046 356,932 356,932 356,932 0.1% 0.1% 4.92% 4.92% Supranational 16,711,738 26,247,930 27,525,000 27,179,635 26,304,657 9.0% 6.2% 2.45% 4.77% Corporate 71,551,741 75,214,801 78,380,000 77,859,320 75,954,352 26.1% 17.8% 3.44% 5.23% US Treasury 99,278,149 110,896,377 122,000,000 121,643,131 118,846,162 40.8% 27.6% 3.50% 4.49% SUBTOTAL 278,736,651 288,990,049 299,433,807 298,206,582 291,266,941 100.00% 67.86% 3.33% 4.84% Accrued Interest 1,408,723 1,713,120 2,031,616
280,145,373 290,703,168 293,298,557
TOTAL PORTFOLIO 401,109,378 422,309,722 441,283,217 440,055,992 435,147,967 100.00% 4.98% 22,800,525 34,272,555 34,038,589
13,072,212 (4,139,616) 12,838,245
June 30, 2024
Change from Prior Year
Change from Prior Quarter
Holdings (Market Value) 6/30/23 9/30/23 12/31/23 3/31/24 6/30/24 LAIF/CAMP 120,768,108 108,913,407 136,194,650 131,332,074 141,555,441 ABS 28,186,820 28,613,814 25,798,334 27,628,978 31,133,561 Agency 53,795,750 46,770,742 45,535,489 39,102,074 29,682,071 Cash1 730,962 742,848
Agency CMBS2 6,570,900 7,428,709 8,685,518 8,630,360 8,540,328 Money Market 2,641,554 859,487 1,159,231 813,046 356,932 Supranational 16,711,738 23,103,092 23,370,361 26,247,930 26,304,657 Corporate 71,551,741 70,490,952 72,851,163 75,214,801 75,954,352 US Treasury 99,278,149 102,206,540 110,817,325 110,896,377 118,846,162 Accrued Interest 3 1,604,620 1,746,703 2,037,268 1,713,120 2,031,616 TOTAL 401,109,378 390,133,446 426,449,339 422,309,722 435,147,967 YIELD TO MATURITY 4.92% 5.19% 4.71% 4.92% 4.98%
247

Page 4 of 4 ends

3Accrued Interest for the Local Pools is included in Cash. (effective March 2024) Funds Managed by the City
The City participates in two local agency investment pools managed by government finance professionals and treasurers: the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) and the California Asset Management Program (CAMP). The following table shows portfolio yields over the most recent eight quarters.

Table 3: Quarterly Portfolio Yields, Recent 8 Quarters
Market Yield LAIF CAMP Chandler
9/30/22 1.60% 2.61% 4.47%
12/31/22 2.23% 4.50% 4.57%
3/31/23 2.88% 4.92% 4.37%
6/30/23 3.26% 5.20% 4.98%
9/30/23 3.61% 5.52% 5.24%
12/31/23 3.95% 5.56% 4.46%
3/31/24 4.27% 5.48% 4.79%
6/30/24 4.56% 5.44% 4.84%
STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

None.

NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:

The City Council Agenda was posted.

ATTACHMENTS:
1) City of Dublin Investment Report for Period Ending June 30, 2024 2) Transaction Ledger – April through June 2024
248

INVESTMENT REPORT
City of Dublin | As of June 30, 2024
CHANDLER ASSET MANAGEMENT | chandlerasset.com
Chandler Team:

For questions about your account, please call (800) 317-4747, or contact [email protected]
Information contained herein is confidential. We urge you to compare this statement to the one you receive from your qualified custodian. Please see Important Disclosures at the end of the statement.

Attachment 1
249

TABLE OF CONTENTS
City of Dublin | As of June 30, 2024

ECONOMIC UPDATE

ACCOUNT PROFILE

CONSOLIDATED INFORMATION

PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS

TRANSACTIONS
1 250

ECONOMIC UPDATE
2 251
Economic Update



Recent economic data suggests positive but slower growth this year fueled by consumer spending. While the consumer has been resilient, growing credit card debt, higher delinquencies, and a moderating labor market pose potential headwinds to future economic growth.

Inflationary trends are subsiding, but core levels remain above the Fed’s target. Given the cumulative effects of restrictive monetary policy and tighter financial conditions, we believe the economy will gradually soften and the Fed will loosen monetary policy in 2024.

As expected at the June meeting, the Federal Open Market Committee voted unanimously to leave the federal funds rate unchanged at a target range of 5.25-5.50%, emphasizing the need to see sustained evidence of easing inflation before considering any rate cuts. The FOMC's latest projections now suggest only one interest rate cut in 2024, with four more cuts expected in 2025 and a slightly higher longterm neutral rate. Additionally, the Fed continues to reduce its holdings of U.S. Treasury securities and agency mortgage-backed securities as per its predefined schedule of $25 billion and $35 billion per month.

The US Treasury yield curve shifted lower in June as economic data moderated. The 2-year Treasury yield fell 12 basis points to 4.76%, the 5-year Treasury dropped 13 basis points to 4.38%, and the 10-year Treasury yield declined 10 basis points to 4.40%. The inversion between the 2-year Treasury yield and 10-year Treasury yield remained relatively stable at -36 basis points at June month-end versus -37 basis points at May month-end. The spread between the 2-year Treasury and 10-year Treasury yield one year ago was -106 basis points. The inversion between 3-month and 10-year Treasuries widened to -96 basis points in June from -91 basis points in May. 3 252
Employment
-400
-200
0 200
400
600
800
1,000
MOM Change In Thousands (000's)
Nonfarm Payroll (000's)
Non-farm Payroll (000's)
3-month average (000's)

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%
Unemployment Rate
Underemployment Rate (U6)
Unemployment Rate (U3)
Rate (%)
The U.S. economy added 206,000 jobs in June, remaining ahead of consensus expectations of 190,000 jobs. The gains were broad based, with government, health care, and social assistance posting the largest gains. The three-month moving average and six-month moving average payrolls have weakened from the first quarter to 177,000 and 222,000 respectively. The unemployment rate edged up to 4.1% in June, and the labor participation rate inched up to 62.6%, remaining below the pre-pandemic level of 63.3%. The U-6 underemployment rate, which includes those who are marginally attached to the labor force and employed part time for economic reasons held steady at

7.4%. Average hourly earnings rose 3.9% year-over-year in June, down from 4.1% year-over-year in May. The labor markets continue to show signs of cooling in line with the Federal Reserve’s view that there has been “substantial” progress towards better balance in the labor market between demand and supply for workers.

Source: US Department of Labor Source: US Department of Labor 4 253
Inflation

0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

3.0%

4.0%

5.0%

6.0%

7.0%

8.0%

9.0%

10.0%
Consumer Price Index (CPI)
CPI YOY % Change
Core CPI YOY % Change
YOY (%) Change

0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

3.0%

4.0%

5.0%

6.0%

7.0%

8.0%

9.0%

10.0%
Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE)
PCE Price Deflator YOY % Change
PCE Core Deflator YOY % Change
Fed Target
YOY (%) Change
In June, the Consumer Price Index (CPI) declined 0.1% month-over-month and rose 3.0% year-over-year, reflecting broad-based cost reductions. The month-over-month drop was the first deflationary data point since the pandemic. The Core CPI, which excludes volatile food and energy components, was up just 0.1% month-over-month and 3.3% year-over-year in June, down from 3.4% in May and lower than expected. The Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) Index decelerated in May as expected. The headline PCE deflator was unchanged in May from April versus up 0.3% in the prior month. Year-over-year, the PCE deflator rose 2.6%. The Core PCE deflator (the Fed’s preferred gauge) increased 0.1% in May from the prior month versus up 0.3% in April. The Core PCE deflator also rose 2.6% yearover-year, still above the Fed’s 2% inflation target. Much of the lingering inflation has been driven by shelter costs and demand for services.

Source: US Department of Labor Source: US Department of Commerce 5 254
Federal Reserve
Source: Federal Reserve Source: Bloomberg
0 1,000,000
2,000,000
3,000,000
4,000,000
5,000,000
6,000,000
7,000,000
8,000,000
9,000,000
10,000,000
Federal Reserve Balance Sheet Assets
Recession
In $ millions
As expected at the June meeting, the Federal Open Market Committee voted unanimously to leave the federal funds rate unchanged at a target range of 5.25-5.50%, emphasizing the need to see sustained evidence of easing inflation before considering any rate cuts. The FOMC's latest projections now suggest only one interest rate cut in 2024, with four more cuts expected in 2025 and a slightly higher longterm neutral rate. The Fed’s inflation projections ticked up marginally, while unemployment and GDP growth forecasts remained steady.

Additionally, the Fed continues to reduce its holdings of U.S. Treasury securities and agency mortgage-backed securities as per its predefined schedule of $25 billion and $35 billion per month. Since the Fed began its Quantitative Tightening campaign in June 2022, securities holdings have declined by approximately $1.7T to approximately $7.3T.

0.00%

1.00%

2.00%

3.00%

4.00%

5.00%

6.00%
Effective Federal Funds Rate
Recession
Yield (%)
6 255
Consumer
-30.0%
-20.0%
-10.0%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%
Retail Sales YOY % Change
YOY (%) Change
Retail Sales were unchanged month-over-month in June after an upwardly revised 0.3% gain in May. On a year-over-year basis, Retail Sales growth further slowed to 2.3% in June from 2.6% in May. Nonstore retailers were a bright spot in June, while motor vehicle and gasoline sales declined. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index fell to 100.4 in June from 101.3 in May. While the present situation component rose marginally, consumers are less optimistic about future expectations for business conditions and potential income increases. While the consumer has been resilient, consumption has begun to moderate in the face of higher interest rates, rising credit card balances, and growing delinquencies.
0 20
40 60
80 100
120
140
160
Index Level
Consumer Confidence
Recession
Source: US Department of Commerce Source: The Conference Board All time high is 144.70 (1/31/00); All time low is 25.30 (2/28/09) 7 256
Leading Indicators of Economic Activity
-25.0%
-20.0%
-15.0%
-10.0%
-5.0%

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%
Leading Economic Indicators (LEI)
Recession
YOY (%) Change
-1.00
-0.75
-0.50
-0.25

0.00 0.25

0.50 0.75

1.00 Chicago Fed National Activity Index (CFNAI)
Recession
3 Month Average
The Conference Board’s Leading Economic Index (LEI) fell 0.2% in June following a 0.4% decline in May. The index dropped 4.8% year-overyear. The report stated that "due to the smaller month-on-month rate of decline, the LEI's long-term growth has become less negative, pointing to a slow recovery.” The Chicago Fed National Activity Index (CFNAI) decreased to 0.05 in June from 0.23 in May, surpassing consensus expectations. The three-month moving average rose to -0.01 in June from -0.08 in May, indicating slightly below-trend growth expectations for the economy.

Source: The Conference Board Source: Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago 8 257
Housing
0 200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
2,000
2,200
2,400
In Thousands of Units
Annualized Housing Starts
Multi Family Housing Starts
Single Family Housing Starts
Housing starts jumped 3.0% month-over-month in June to a higher-than-expected 1.353 million units, driven primarily by the multi-family category. Starts were down 4.4% year-over-year. The Freddie Mac average rate for a 30-year fixed mortgage edged down to 6.92% in June from 7.06% in May. According to the Case-Shiller 20-City Home Price Index, housing prices rose a higher-than-expected 7.2% yearover-year in April versus March's upwardly revised 7.5% increase. Tight inventories and higher mortgage rates continue to impact affordability.

Source: US Department of Commerce Source: S&P
-20.0%
-16.0%
-12.0%
-8.0%
-4.0%

0.0%

4.0%

8.0%

12.0%

16.0%

20.0%

24.0%
S&P/Case-Shiller 20 City Composite Home Price Index
Recession
YOY (%) Change
9 258
Survey Based Measures
40 45
50 55
60 65
70 Institute of Supply Management (ISM) Surveys
ISM Manufacturing ISM Services

EXPANDING

CONTRACTING
The Institute for Supply Management (ISM) Manufacturing index edged down to 48.5 in June from 48.7 in May. While new orders picked up, prices paid for materials fell the most in over a year. The ISM Services Index returned to contraction declining to 48.8 in June, from

53.8 in the previous month. Although the level of the decline was a surprise, the trend in the Services PMI, which applies to a larger share of US economic output, has been steadily decreasing.

Source: Institute for Supply Management
10 259
Gross Domestic Product (GDP)
Components of GDP 6/23 9/23 12/23 3/24

0.6% 2.1% 2.2% 1.0%

0.9% 1.7% 0.2% 0.8%

0.0% 0.0% 0.3% -0.7%

0.1% 0.5% 0.2% 0.0%

0.5% 0.5% 0.6% 0.3%

2.1% 4.9% 3.4% 1.4%
State and Local (Consumption and Gross
Investment)
Personal Consumption Expenditures
Gross Private Domestic Investment
Net Exports and Imports
Federal Government Expenditures
Total
-40.0%
-30.0%
-20.0%
-10.0%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%
Gross Domestic Product (GDP)
GDP QOQ % Change
GDP YOY % Change
Source: US Department of Commerce Source: US Department of Commerce The third and final estimate of first quarter GDP came in as expected with growth up 1.4%, a small upward revision from 1.3% in the second estimate. Notably, the personal consumption expenditures component was revised down substantially to +1.5% in the final estimate from +2.0% in the second estimate. Weaker growth in consumer spending was offset by upward revisions in other major categories, particularly gross fixed investment. The consensus projection calls for 2.0% growth in the second quarter and 2.3% growth for the full year 2024.
11 260
Bond Yields
Source: Bloomberg Source: Bloomberg

0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

3.0%

4.0%

5.0%

6.0%
US Treasury Note Yields
2-Year
5-Year
10-Year
Yield (%)

0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

3.0%

4.0%

5.0%

6.0%
US Treasury Yield Curve
Jun-24
Mar-24
Jun-23
Yield (%)
At the end of June, the 2-year Treasury yield was 15 basis points lower, and the 10-Year Treasury yield was 56 basis points higher, yearover-year. The inversion between the 2-year Treasury yield and 10-year Treasury yield remained relatively stable at -36 basis points at June month-end versus -37 basis points at May month-end. The inversion has occurred since July 2022 and remains historically long. The average historical spread (since 2003) is about +130 basis points. The inversion between 3-month and 10-year Treasuries widened to -96 basis points in June from -91 basis points in May.
12 261

ACCOUNT PROFILE
13 262

OBJECTIVES
City of Dublin | As of June 30, 2024
Investment Objectives
The investment objectives of the City of Dublin are first, to provide safety of principal; second, to provide adequate liquidity to meet all requirements which might be reasonably anticipated; third, to attain a market average rate of return on its investments throughout economic cycles; and fourth, to be diversified to avoid incurring unreasonable and avoidable risks regarding specific security types or individual financial institutions.

Chandler Asset Management Performance Objective
The performance objective of the City of Dublin is to earn a return that equals or exceeds the return on of the ICE BofA 1-5 Year Treasury and Agency Index.

Strategy
In order to achieve this objective, the portfolio invests in high quality fixed income instruments consistent with the City's investment policy and California Government Code.
14 263

STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
City of Dublin | As of June 30, 2024
Rules Name Limit Actual Compliance
Status Notes

AGENCY MORTGAGE SECURITIES (CMOS)
Max % (MV) 20.0 2.9 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 20.0 2.9 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 5.0 4.3 Compliant

ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES (ABS)
Max % (MV; Non Agency ABS & MBS) 20.0 10.6 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 5.0 1.1 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years)54 Compliant
Min Rating (AA- by 1) 0.0 0.0 Compliant

BANKERS' ACCEPTANCES
Max % (MV) 40.0 0.0 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 5.0 0.0 Compliant
Max Maturity (Days) 180 0.0 Compliant
Min Rating (A-1 by 1) 0.0 0.0 Compliant

COMMERCIAL PAPER
Max % (MV) 25.0 0.0 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 5.0 0.0 Compliant
Max Maturity (Days) 270 0.0 Compliant
Min Rating (A-1 by 1 or A- by 1) 0.0 0.0 Compliant

CORPORATE MEDIUM TERM NOTES
Max % (MV) 30.0 26.2 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 5.0 1.5 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years)54 Compliant
Min Rating (A- by 1) 0.0 0.0
Compliant

FEDERAL AGENCIES
Max % (MV) 100.0 10.2 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 35.0 3.5 Compliant
Max Callables (MV) 25.0 0.0 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years)53 Compliant
15 264

STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
City of Dublin | As of June 30, 2024
Rules Name Limit Actual Compliance
Status Notes

LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND (LAIF)
Max Concentration (MV) 0.0 Compliant

MONEY MARKET MUTUAL FUNDS
Max % (MV; Money Market Fund & Mutual Fund) 20.0 0.1 Compliant Max % Issuer (MV) 20.0 0.1 Compliant
Min Rating (AAA by 2) 0.0 0.0 Compliant

MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES (NON-AGENCY)
Max % (MV) 20.0 0.0 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 5.0 0.0 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 5.0 0.0 Compliant
Min Rating (AA- by 1) 0.0 0.0 Compliant

MUNICIPAL SECURITIES (ALL STATES)
Max % Issuer (MV) 5.0 0.0 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 5.0 0.0 Compliant
Min Rating (A- by 1) 0.0 0.0 Compliant

MUTUAL FUNDS
Max % (MV; Money Market Fund & Mutual Fund) 20.0 0.1 Compliant Max % Issuer (MV) 10.0 0.0 Compliant
Min Rating (AAA by 2) 0.0 0.0 Compliant

NEGOTIABLE CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT (NCD)
Max % (MV) 30.0 0.0 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 5.0 0.0 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years)5 0.0 Compliant
Min Rating (A-1 by 1 or A- by 1 if > FDIC Limit) 0.0 0. 0 Compliant

SUPRANATIONAL OBLIGATIONS
Max % (MV) 30.0 9.0 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 10.0 4.3 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years)54 Compliant
Min Rating (AA- by 1) 0.0 0.0 Compliant
16 265

STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
City of Dublin | As of June 30, 2024
Rules Name Limit Actual Compliance
Status Notes

TIME DEPOSITS
Max % (MV) 10.0 0.0 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 5.0 0.0 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 1.0 0.0 Compliant
U.S. TREASURIES
Max % (MV) 100.0 40.8 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 5 4 Compliant
17 266

PORTFOLIO CHARACTERISTICS
City of Dublin | As of June 30, 2024
Benchmark* 6/30/2024
Portfolio
3/31/2024
Portfolio
Average Maturity (yrs) 2.68 3.03 2.90
Average Modified Duration 2.51 2.57 2.50
Average Purchase Yield 3.32% 3.12%
Average Market Yield 4.66% 4.84% 4.79%
Average Quality** AA+ AA AA
Total Market Value 293,298,557 290,703,168
*Benchmark: ICE BofA 1-5 Year Unsubordinated US Treasury & Agency Index **The credit quality is a weighted average calculation of the highest of S&P, Moody’s and Fitch. 18 267

SECTOR DISTRIBUTION
City of Dublin | As of June 30, 2024
Sector as a Percentage of Market Value
Sector 06/30/2024 03/31/2024
US Treasury 40.8% 38.4%
Corporate 26.1% 26.0%
ABS 10.7% 9.6%
Agency 10.2% 13.5%
Supras 9.0% 9.1%
Agency CMBS 2.9% 3.0%
Cash 0.2% 0.2%
Money Mkt Fd 0.1% 0.3%
19 268

ISSUERS
City of Dublin | As of June 30, 2024
Issuer Investment Type % Portfolio
United States US Treasury 40.80%
FHLMC Multiple 5.77%
International Bank for Recon and Dev Supras 4.34%
Inter-American Development Bank Supras 4.14%
FNMA Agency 3.55%
Federal Home Loan Banks Agency 2.91%
Chase Issuance Trust ABS 1.71%
John Deere Owner Trust ABS 1.65%
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated Corporate 1.49%
Bank of Montreal Corporate 1.47%
Bank of America Corporation Corporate 1.41%
Deere & Company Corporate 1.36%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank Corporate 1.35%
Toyota Motor Corporation Corporate 1.30%
U.S. Bancorp Corporate 1.30%
Royal Bank of Canada Corporate 1.19%
Merck & Co., Inc. Corporate 1.18%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. Corporate 1.15%
QUALCOMM Incorporated Corporate 1.01%
MERCEDES-BENZ AUTO RECEIVABLES TRUST ABS 0.96%
Amazon.com, Inc. Corporate 0.92%
Tennessee Valley Authority Agency 0.89%
Caterpillar Inc. Corporate 0.85%
Northwestern Mutual Global Funding Corporate 0.85%
Chubb Limited Corporate 0.84%
Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust ABS 0.83%
Honeywell International Inc. Corporate 0.83%
BMW Vehicle Owner Trust ABS 0.82%
20 269

ISSUERS
City of Dublin | As of June 30, 2024
Issuer Investment Type % Portfolio
Honda Motor Co., Ltd. Corporate 0.80%
Morgan Stanley Corporate 0.77%
Realty Income Corporation Corporate 0.75%
American Express Credit Master Trust ABS 0.74%
GM Financial Securitized Term ABS 0.74%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Corporate 0.74%
Honda Auto Receivables Owner Trust ABS 0.72%
GM Financial Automobile Leasing Trus ABS 0.70%
Walmart Inc. Corporate 0.69%
The Charles Schwab Corporation Corporate 0.62%
Metropolitan Life Global Funding I Corporate 0.59%
International Finance Corporation Supras 0.55%
Cisco Systems, Inc. Corporate 0.54%
Bank of America Credit Card Trust ABS 0.51%
BNY Mellon Corp Corporate 0.50%
Target Corporation Corporate 0.43%
Met Tower Global Funding Corporate 0.40%
Toyota Lease Owner Trust ABS 0.34%
Toyota Auto Receivables Owner Trust ABS 0.34%
Dominion Energy, Inc. Corporate 0.33%
Hyundai Auto Lease Securitization Tr ABS 0.27%
Mercedes-Benz Auto Lease Trust ABS 0.26%
Guardian Life Global Funding Corporate 0.25%
Salesforce, Inc. Corporate 0.16%
Cash Cash 0.15%
First American Govt Oblig fund Money Mkt Fd 0.12%
BMW Vehicle Lease Trust ABS 0.09%
TOTAL 100.00%
21 270

QUALITY DISTRIBUTION
Rating 06/30/2024 03/31/2024
AAA 18.5% 17.9%
AA 58.2% 59.3%
A 20.9% 20.7%
BBB 0.3% 0.3%
NR 2.2% 1.8%
Rating 06/30/2024 03/31/2024
AAA 69.1% 69.3%
AA 2.7% 2.7%
A 22.6% 22.5%
NR 5.5% 5.5%
Rating 06/30/2024 03/31/2024
AAA 11.4% 11.2%
AA 61.0% 62.1%
A 11.7% 11.6%
NR 15.9% 15.2%
City of Dublin | As of June 30, 2024
S&P Rating Moody’s Rating Fitch Rating
22 271
0-.25 .25-.5 .5-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5 5-7 7+
Portfolio 1.1% 0.4% 12.5% 18.7% 25.5% 29.7% 12.1% 0.0% 0.0% ICE BofA 1-5 Year Unsubordinated US
Treasury & Agency Index

0.0% 0.1% 2.4% 35.0% 26.8% 22.9% 12.8% 0.0% 0.0%

DURATION DISTRIBUTION
City of Dublin | As of June 30, 2024
Portfolio Compared to the Benchmark
23 272
3 Months 12 Months 2 Years 3 Years 5 Years 10 Years Since Inception

TOTAL RATE OF RETURN
City of Dublin Gross of Fees 0.89% 4.69% 2.50% 0.11% 1.13% 1.39% 1.35% Benchmark 0.82% 4.18% 1.85% (0.34%) 0.76% 1.13% 1.09%
*Periods over 1 year are annualized.

Benchmark: ICE BofA 1-5 Year Unsubordinated US Treasury & Agency Index Total rate of return: A measure of a portfolio’s performance over time. It is the internal rate of return, which equates the beginning value of the portfolio with the ending market value; it includes interest earnings, realized and unrealized gains and losses in the portfolio. Realized rate of return: A measure of a portfolio’s return over time. It is the internal rate which equates the beginning book value of the portfolio with the ending book value; it includes interest earnings, realized gains and losses in the portfolio.

INVESTMENT PERFORMANCE
City of Dublin | As of June 30, 2024
Total Rate of Return : Inception | 11/01/2013
-1.00%

0.00%

1.00%

2.00%

3.00%

4.00%

5.00%
12 months 2 years 3 years 5 years 10 years Since Inception City of Dublin ICE BofA 1-5 Yr US Treasury & Agency Index* 24 273

PORTFOLIO CHARACTERISTICS
City of Dublin Reporting Account | As of June 30, 2024
6/30/2024
Portfolio
3/31/2024
Portfolio
Average Maturity (yrs) 0.00 0.00
Average Modified Duration 0.00 0.00
Average Purchase Yield 5.26% 5.22%
Average Market Yield 5.26% 5.22%
Average Quality** AAA AAA
Total Market Value 141,849,410 131,606,553
*Benchmark: NO BENCHMARK REQUIRED
**The credit quality is a weighted average calculation of the highest of S&P, Moody’s and Fitch. 25 274

SECTOR DISTRIBUTION
City of Dublin Reporting Account | As of June 30, 2024
Sector as a Percentage of Market Value
Sector 06/30/2024 03/31/2024
LGIP 80.7% 79.4%
LAIF 19.1% 20.4%
Cash 0.2% 0.2%
26 275

ISSUERS
City of Dublin Reporting Account | As of June 30, 2024
Issuer Investment Type % Portfolio
California Asset Mgmt Program LGIP 80.70%
LAIF LAIF 19.10%
Cash Cash 0.21%
TOTAL 100.00%
27 276

CONSOLIDATED INFORMATION
28 277

PORTFOLIO CHARACTERISTICS
City of Dublin Cons | As of June 30, 2024
6/30/2024
Portfolio
3/31/2024
Portfolio
Average Maturity (yrs) 2.03 1.99
Average Modified Duration 1.73 1.74
Average Purchase Yield 3.96% 3.77%
Average Market Yield 4.98% 4.93%
Average Quality** AA+ AA+
Total Market Value 435,147,967 422,309,722
*Benchmark: NO BENCHMARK REQUIRED
**The credit quality is a weighted average calculation of the highest of S&P, Moody’s and Fitch. 29 278

SECTOR DISTRIBUTION
City of Dublin Cons | As of June 30, 2024
Sector as a Percentage of Market Value
Sector 06/30/2024 03/31/2024
US Treasury 27.4% 26.4%
LGIP 26.4% 24.9%
Corporate 17.5% 17.9%
ABS 7.2% 6.6%
Agency 6.9% 9.3%
LAIF 6.3% 6.4%
Supras 6.1% 6.2%
Agency CMBS 2.0% 2.1%
Cash 0.2% 0.2%
Money Mkt Fd 0.1% 0.2%
30 279

PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS
31 280

HOLDINGS REPORT
City of Dublin | As of June 30, 2024
Cusip Security Description Par Value/
Units
Purchase
Date
Purchase
Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.

Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
ABS
44933LAC7 HART 2021-A A3 0.38 09/15/2025 23,324.53 04/20/2021 23,322.08 99.76 23,268.74 0.01% NA/AAA 1.21

0.39% 23,324.06 4.84% 3.94 (55.31) AAA 0.06
47788UAC6 JDOT 2021 A3 0.36 09/15/2025 71,719.50 03/02/2021 71,705.72 99.37 71,268.35 0.02% Aaa/NA 1.21

0.37% 71,716.50 4.93% 11.48 (448.15) AAA 0.14
05593AAC3 BMWLT 2023-1 A3 5.16 11/25/2025 259,836.30 02/07/2023 259,830.12 99.81 259,351.63 0.09% Aaa/AAA 1.41

5.43% 259,833.18 5.69% 223.46 (481.55) NA 0.42
44934KAC8 HART 2021-B A3 0.38 01/15/2026 370,088.86 07/20/2021 370,007.18 99.09 366,717.21 0.13% NA/AAA 1.54

0.60% 370,066.83 3.83% 62.50 (3,349.62) AAA 0.27
43815GAC3 HAROT 2021-4 A3 0.88 01/21/2026 305,675.16 11/16/2021 305,610.73 97.97 299,455.62 0.10% Aaa/NA 1.56

0.89% 305,653.75 4.64% 74.72 (6,198.13) AAA 0.55
47789QAC4 JDOT 2021-B A3 0.52 03/16/2026 283,762.88 07/13/2021 283,737.57 98.07 278,298.37 0.10% Aaa/NA 1.71

0.52% 283,754.85 4.81% 65.58 (5,456.48) AAA 0.45
44935FAD6 HART 2021-C A3 0.74 05/15/2026 206,015.62 11/09/2021 205,969.64 98.36 202,637.23 0.07% NA/AAA 1.87

0.75% 205,999.43 4.11% 67.76 (3,362.20) AAA 0.49
43815BAC4 HAROT 2022-1 A3 1.88 05/15/2026 814,238.71 02/15/2022 814,116.25 98.11 798,826.32 0.27% Aaa/AAA 1.87

1.89% 814,189.28 4.63% 680.34 (15,362.97) NA 0.70
05602RAD3 BMWOT 2022-A A3 3.21 08/25/2026 528,884.81 05/10/2022 528,857.31 98.66 521,813.10 0.18% Aaa/AAA 2.15

3.23% 528,872.01 4.97% 282.95 (7,058.92) NA 0.78
47787JAC2 JDOT 2022 A3 0.36 09/15/2026 558,047.02 03/10/2022 557,923.57 98.03 547,069.51 0.19% Aaa/NA 2.21

2.34% 557,990.70 5.46% 575.41 (10,921.20) AAA 0.64
362554AC1 GMCAR 2021-4 A3 0.68 09/16/2026 261,651.22 10/13/2021 261,644.55 97.67 255,561.18 0.09% Aaa/AAA 2.21

0.68% 261,648.68 4.17% 74.13 (6,087.50) NA 0.69
448977AD0 HART 2022-A A3 2.22 10/15/2026 678,826.55 03/09/2022 678,800.41 98.19 666,522.61 0.23% NA/AAA 2.29

2.23% 678,814.77 4.60% 669.78 (12,292.16) AAA 0.78
380146AC4 GMCAR 2022-1 A3 1.26 11/16/2026 267,907.55 01/11/2022 267,884.27 97.78 261,972.54 0.09% NA/AAA 2.38

1.27% 267,897.50 4.27% 140.65 (5,924.96) AAA 0.76
362585AC5 GMCAR 2022-2 A3 3.1 02/16/2027 584,899.26 04/05/2022 584,777.01 98.42 575,658.43 0.20% Aaa/AAA 2.63

3.13% 584,838.42 4.81% 755.49 (9,179.99) NA 0.97
47800AAC4 JDOT 2022-B A3 3.74 02/16/2027 919,763.59 07/12/2022 919,675.75 98.59 906,794.93 0.31% Aaa/NA 2.63

3.77% 919,715.04 5.33% 1,528.85 (12,920.11) AAA 0.88
32 281

Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
448988AD7 HALST 24A A3 5.02 03/15/2027 785,000.00 01/17/2024

5.03%
784,851.24
784,871.88

99.58 5.37%
781,682.35
1,751.42

0.27%
(3,189.52)
NA/AAA
AAA

2.71 1.63
36269FAD8 GMALT 2024-1 A3 5.09 03/22/2027 995,000.00 02/08/2024

5.09%
994,875.63
994,890.70

99.52 5.46%
990,221.02
1,547.50

0.34%
(4,669.68)
NA/AAA
AAA

2.73 1.65
89238GAD3 TLOT 2024-A A3 5.25 04/20/2027 1,000,000.00 02/21/2024

5.25%
999,957.80
999,962.39

99.99 5.36%
999,860.60
1,604.17

0.34%
(101.79)
NA/AAA
AAA

2.80 1.72
02582JJT8 AMXCA 2022-2 A 05/17/2027 2,205,000.00 05/17/2022

3.42%
2,204,512.25
2,204,797.58

98.21 5.54%
2,165,530.50
3,322.20

0.74%
(39,267.08)
NA/AAA
AAA

0.87 0.92
47800BAC2 JDOT 2022-C A3 5.09 06/15/2027 1,350,000.00 10/12/2022

5.15%
1,349,895.24
1,349,934.71

99.64 5.50%
1,345,179.29
3,054.00

0.46%
(4,755.42)
Aaa/NA
AAA

2.96 1.05
36269WAD1 GMALT 2024-2 A3 5.39 07/20/2027 1,055,000.00 05/07/2024

5.85%
1,054,938.71
1,054,941.14
100.29

5.30%
1,058,056.44
1,737.53

0.36%
3,115.30
NA/AAA
AAA

3.05 1.71
58768PAC8 MBART 2022-1 A3 5.21 08/16/2027 2,790,000.00 11/15/2022

5.28%
2,789,448.14
2,789,641.24

99.81 5.43%
2,784,636.50
6,460.40

0.96%
(5,004.73)
Aaa/AAA
NA

3.13 1.28
58770JAD6 MBALT 2024-A A3 5.32 01/18/2028 765,000.00 05/17/2024

5.73%
764,910.50
764,913.11
100.29

5.25%
767,190.50
1,808.80

0.26%
2,277.39
Aaa/NA
AAA

3.55 2.00
362583AD8 GMCAR 2023-2 A3 4.47 02/16/2028 625,000.00 04/04/2023

4.51%
624,982.81
624,987.14

98.90 5.10%
618,103.06
1,164.06

0.21%
(6,884.08)
Aaa/AAA
NA

3.63 1.96
05592XAD2 BMWOT 2023-A A3 5.47 02/25/2028 550,000.00 07/11/2023

5.47%
549,902.54
549,922.75
100.31

5.39%
551,723.37
501.42

0.19%
1,800.62
NA/AAA
AAA

3.66 1.96
89239FAD4 TAOT 2023-D A3 5.54 08/15/2028 980,000.00 11/07/2023

6.30%
979,894.36
979,908.36
100.71

5.32%
987,000.04
2,412.98

0.34%
7,091.69
NA/AAA
AAA

4.13 2.51
161571HT4 CHAIT 2023-1 A 5.16 09/15/2028 3,090,000.00 09/07/2023

5.17%
3,089,143.45
3,089,279.41
100.26

5.11%
3,097,888.15
7,086.40

1.06%
8,608.74
NR/AAA
AAA

4.21 2.03
47800RAD5 JDOT 2024 A3 4.96 11/15/2028 550,000.00 03/11/2024

5.12%
549,969.20
549,971.08

99.61 5.22%
547,835.59
1,212.44

0.19%
(2,135.50)
Aaa/NA
AAA

4.38 2.07
437930AC4 HONDO-242-A3 5.27 11/20/2028 1,000,000.00 05/14/2024

5.27%
999,878.50
999,881.53
100.27

5.21%
1,002,699.10
1,903.06

0.34%
2,817.57
NA/AAA
AAA

4.39 2.06
36268GAD7 GMCAR 2024-1 A3 4.85 12/18/2028 445,000.00 01/09/2024

4.91%
444,910.51
444,918.78

99.39 5.13%
442,298.41
899.27

0.15%
(2,620.37)
Aaa/NA
AAA

4.47 2.77
161571HV9 CHAIT 241 A 4.6 01/16/2029 1,910,000.00 01/24/2024

4.61%
1,909,709.11
1,909,733.51

99.08 5.17%
1,892,436.79
3,904.89

0.65%
(17,296.73)
NR/AAA
AAA

4.55 2.41
33 282

Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
448973AD9 HART 2024-A A3 4.99 02/15/2029 1,170,000.00 03/11/2024 1,169,742.02 99.63 1,165,697.79 0.40% NA/AAA 4.63

5.05% 1,169,756.84 5.24% 2,594.80 (4,059.05) AAA 2.05
096919AD7 BMWOT 2024-A A3 5.18 02/26/2029 1,305,000.00 06/04/2024 1,304,801.77 100.10 1,306,289.21 0.45% Aaa/AAA 4.66

5.18% 1,304,804.07 5.21% 3,755.50 1,485.14 NA 2.10
47786WAD2 JDOT 2024-B A3 5.2 03/15/2029 1,110,000.00 06/11/2024 1,109,783.00 100.31 1,113,429.35 0.38% Aaa/NA 4.71

5.81% 1,109,784.63 5.14% 2,084.33 3,644.72 AAA 2.32
05522RDJ4 BACCT 2024-1 A 4.93 03/15/2029 1,480,000.00 06/06/2024 1,479,916.97 100.04 1,480,586.97 0.51% Aaa/AAA 4.71

4.93% 1,479,917.83 4.99% 3,648.20 669.14 NA 2.61
31,289,885.92 99.49 31,133,560.79 10.69% Aaa/AAA 3.32
Total ABS 31,294,641.58 4.54% 31,291,133.68 5.19% 57,670.41 (157,572.89) AAA 1.63 AGENCY
3137EAEP0 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE 4,200,000.00 -- 4,254,786.30 97.70 4,103,363.80 1.41% Aaa/AA+ 0.62 CORP 1.5 02/12/2025 1.23% 4,206,862.12 5.34% 24,325.00 (103,498.32) AA+ 0.60 3135G03U5 FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE 1,825,000.00 04/22/2020 1,821,240.50 96.43 1,759,771.23 0.60% Aaa/AA+ 0.81 ASSOCIATION 0.625 04/22/2025 0.67% 1,824,391.97 5.18% 2,186.20 (64,620.73) AA+ 0.79 3135G04Z3 FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE 3,435,000.00 06/17/2020 3,427,889.55 95.66 3,286,058.40 1.13% Aaa/AA+ 0.96 ASSOCIATION 0.5 06/17/2025 0.54% 3,433,631.71 5.17% 667.92 (147,573.31) AA+ 0.94 3137EAEU9 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE 1,745,000.00 07/21/2020 1,736,309.90 95.27 1,662,543.11 0.57% Aaa/AA+ 1.06 CORP 0.375 07/21/2025 0.48% 1,743,165.74 5.01% 2,908.33 (80,622.63) AA+ 1.03 3135G05X7 FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE 2,755,000.00 08/25/2020 2,742,106.60 94.81 2,612,024.26 0.90% Aaa/AA+ 1.15 ASSOCIATION 0.375 08/25/2025 0.47% 2,752,031.13 5.07% 3,615.94 (140,006.86) AA+ 1.12 3137EAEX3 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE 2,655,000.00 09/23/2020 2,647,008.45 94.51 2,509,290.97 0.86% Aaa/AA+ 1.23 CORP 0.375 09/23/2025 0.44% 2,653,032.78 5.03% 2,710.31 (143,741.81) AA+ 1.20 3135G06G3 FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE 2,860,000.00 11/09/2020 2,849,761.20 94.22 2,694,821.56 0.93% Aaa/AA+ 1.36 ASSOCIATION 0.5 11/07/2025 0.57% 2,857,222.42 4.97% 2,145.00 (162,400.87) AA+ 1.32 3130ATUC9 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 4.5 4,000,000.00 02/09/2023 4,029,238.40 99.42 3,976,806.00 1.37% Aaa/AA+ 1.45 12/12/2025 4.22% 4,014,929.65 4.92% 9,500.00 (38,123.65) AA+ 1.38 3130ATS57 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 4.5 3,000,000.00 03/21/2023 3,065,010.00 99.88 2,996,319.09 1.03% Aaa/AA+ 3.70 03/10/2028 4.01% 3,048,282.91 4.53% 41,625.00 (51,963.82) AA+ 3.32 880591EZ1 TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY 2,645,000.00 -- 2,661,791.35 97.82 2,587,340.96 0.89% Aaa/AA+ 3.71

3.875 03/15/2028 3.73% 2,657,737.50 4.52% 30,178.72 (70,396.54) AA+ 3.37 34 283

Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
3130AWMN7 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 4.375 1,500,000.00 07/26/2023 1,506,615.00 99.58 1,493,731.65 0.51% Aaa/AA+ 3.94 06/09/2028 4.27% 1,505,350.75 4.49% 4,010.42 (11,619.10) AA+ 3.57 30,741,757.25 96.98 29,682,071.03 10.19% Aaa/AA+ 1.72
Total Agency 30,620,000.00 1.94% 30,696,638.66 4.96% 123,872.83 (1,014,567.63) AA+ 1.60

AGENCY CMBS
3137BFE98 FHMS K-041 A2 3.171 10/25/2024 1,893,353.88 07/01/2021 2,036,686.69 99.20 1,878,258.55 0.64% Aaa/AA+ 0.32

0.66% 1,904,510.07 5.64% 5,003.19 (26,251.52) AAA 0.24
3137BSRE5 FHMS K-059 A2 3.12 09/25/2026 2,000,000.00 02/18/2022 2,085,625.00 96.11 1,922,262.60 0.66% Aaa/AAA 2.24

2.08% 2,041,100.00 4.99% 5,200.00 (118,837.40) AAA 2.02 3137F4D41 FHMS K-074 A2 3.6 01/25/2028 1,000,000.00 07/25/2023 954,414.06 95.85 958,528.40 0.33% Aaa/AA+ 3.57

4.73% 963,965.13 4.87% 3,000.00 (5,436.73) AAA 3.20
3137FG6X8 FHMS K-077 A2 3.85 05/25/2028 2,815,000.00 05/24/2023 2,763,318.36 96.44 2,714,793.88 0.93% Aaa/AA+ 3.90

4.24% 2,774,758.46 4.85% 9,031.46 (59,964.57) AAA 3.46
3137FK4M5 FHMS K-085 A2 4.06 10/25/2028 1,100,000.00 10/30/2023 1,038,253.91 96.95 1,066,484.32 0.37% Aaa/AA+ 4.32

5.37% 1,046,578.45 4.83% 3,721.67 19,905.87 AA+ 3.83
8,878,298.02 96.97 8,540,327.75 2.93% Aaa/AA+ 2.76
Total Agency CMBS 8,808,353.88 3.16% 8,730,912.11 5.05% 25,956.31 (190,584.36) AAA 2.44 CASH
CCYUSD Receivable 448,878.89 -- 448,878.89 1.00 448,878.89 0.15% Aaa/AAA 0.00

0.00% 448,878.89 0.00% 0.00 0.00 AAA 0.00
448,878.89 1.00 448,878.89 0.15% Aaa/AAA 0.00
Total Cash 448,878.89 0.00% 448,878.89 0.00% 0.00 0.00 AAA 0.00

CORPORATE
79466LAG9 SALESFORCE INC 0.625 07/15/2024 465,000.00 06/29/2021 464,762.85 99.81 464,106.61 0.16% A1/A+ 0.04

0.64% 464,996.98 5.23% 1,340.10 (890.37) NA 0.04
90331HPL1 US BANK NA 2.05 01/21/2025 2,610,000.00 01/16/2020 2,604,440.70 98.01 2,557,979.49 0.88% A2/A+ 0.56

2.09% 2,609,379.26 5.73% 23,780.00 (51,399.77) A+ 0.54
35 284

Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
00440EAS6 CHUBB INA HOLDINGS LLC 3.15
03/15/2025
2,500,000.00 --

0.78%
2,753,600.00
2,541,295.86

98.43 5.44%
2,460,641.95
23,187.50

0.84%
(80,653.91)
A3/A
A

0.71 0.68
14913R2V8 CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES
CORP 3.4 05/13/2025
1,165,000.00 05/10/2022

3.44%
1,163,520.45
1,164,573.42

98.36 5.35%
1,145,870.47
5,281.33

0.39%
(18,702.95)
A2/A
A+

0.87 0.84
747525AF0 QUALCOMM INC 3.45 05/20/2025 3,000,000.00 --

1.61%
3,159,848.58
3,034,640.01

98.36 5.36%
2,950,764.09
11,787.50

1.01%
(83,875.92)
A2/A
NA

0.89 0.86
438516CB0 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC

1.35 06/01/2025
2,500,000.00 06/23/2020

0.85%
2,559,500.00
2,510,213.44

96.43 5.38%
2,410,813.43
2,812.50

0.83%
(99,400.01)
A2/A
A

0.92 0.89
78015K7H1 ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 1.15
06/10/2025
1,000,000.00 02/22/2021

0.86%
1,012,240.00
1,002,687.02

96.02 5.53%
960,243.36
670.83

0.33%
(42,443.66)
A1/A
AA0.940.92
66815L2J7 NORTHWESTERNMUTUAL GLOBAL
FUNDING 4.0 07/01/2025
2,500,000.00 06/27/2022

4.01%
2,499,150.00
2,499,716.92

98.74 5.31%
2,468,519.40
50,000.00

0.85%
(31,197.52)
Aaa/AA+
AAA

1.00 0.95
02665WDL2 AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORP

1.2 07/08/2025
1,000,000.00 08/10/2021

1.00%
1,007,640.00
1,001,993.04

95.80 5.48%
958,026.26
5,766.67

0.33%
(43,966.78)
A3/AA1.02

0.99 89114QCK2 TORONTO-DOMINION BANK 0.75
09/11/2025
1,000,000.00 02/16/2021

0.81%
997,230.00
999,273.42

94.62 5.45%
946,242.16
2,291.67

0.32%
(53,031.26)
A1/A
AA1.201.16
06051GHY8 BANK OF AMERICA CORP 2.015
02/13/2026
1,250,000.00 03/04/2021

1.15%
1,291,725.00
1,256,586.63

97.71 6.10%
1,221,390.88
9,655.21

0.42%
(35,195.75)
A1/AAA1.62

0.60 46647PBH8 JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 2.005
03/13/2026
1,000,000.00 04/29/2021

1.21%
1,030,270.00
1,005,462.74

97.41 6.48%
974,105.85
6,015.00

0.33%
(31,356.89)
A1/AAA1.70

0.68 808513BR5 CHARLES SCHWAB CORP 1.15
05/13/2026
1,370,000.00 05/11/2021

1.20%
1,366,821.60
1,368,814.63

92.48 5.44%
1,266,927.86
2,100.67

0.43%
(101,886.77)
A2/AA1.87

1.80 91324PEC2 UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 1.15
05/15/2026
2,000,000.00 --

1.90%
1,939,210.15
1,972,950.03

92.96 5.14%
1,859,139.14
2,938.89

0.64%
(113,810.89)
A2/A+
A

1.87 1.81
89236TJK2 TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP 1.125
06/18/2026
2,485,000.00 06/15/2021

1.13%
2,483,906.60
2,484,570.67

92.61 5.12%
2,301,297.74
1,009.53

0.79%
(183,272.92)
A1/A+
A+

1.97 1.90
58989V2D5 MET TOWER GLOBAL FUNDING 1.25
09/14/2026
1,285,000.00 09/07/2021

1.27%
1,283,817.80
1,284,478.82

91.68 5.30%
1,178,038.13
4,774.13

0.40%
(106,440.69)
Aa3/AAAA2.21

2.12 06368FAC3 BANK OF MONTREAL 1.25
09/15/2026
2,500,000.00 --

1.29%
2,495,539.50
2,498,031.13

91.60 5.33%
2,289,940.70
9,201.39

0.79%
(208,090.43)
A2/AAA2.21

2.12 931142ER0 WALMART INC 1.05 09/17/2026 585,000.00 09/08/2021

1.09%
583,894.35
584,510.75

92.18 4.81%
539,274.71
1,774.50

0.19%
(45,236.04)
Aa2/AA
AA

2.22 2.14
36 285

Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
59217GER6 METROPOLITAN LIFE GLOBAL
FUNDING I 1.875 01/11/2027
1,860,000.00 01/03/2022

1.90%
1,857,879.60
1,858,927.02

92.28 5.17%
1,716,316.97
16,468.75

0.59%
(142,610.05)
Aa3/AAAA2.53

2.40 87612EBM7 TARGET CORP 1.95 01/15/2027 1,340,000.00 01/19/2022

1.99%
1,337,722.00
1,338,836.56

93.06 4.89%
1,247,006.95
12,048.83

0.43%
(91,829.61)
A2/A
A

2.54 2.41
808513BY0 CHARLES SCHWAB CORP 2.45
03/03/2027
585,000.00 03/01/2022

2.47%
584,368.20
584,662.65

93.27 5.18%
545,606.14
4,697.88

0.19%
(39,056.51)
A2/AA2.67

2.52 084664CZ2 BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY FINANCE
CORP 2.3 03/15/2027
2,295,000.00 03/07/2022

2.30%
2,294,563.95
2,294,764.30

93.74 4.79%
2,151,270.87
15,542.25

0.74%
(143,493.43)
Aa2/AA
A+

2.71 2.56
40139LBF9 GUARDIAN LIFE GLOBAL FUNDING

3.246 03/29/2027
765,000.00 03/24/2022

3.25%
765,000.00
765,000.00

95.34 5.08%
729,369.09
6,345.93

0.25%
(35,630.91)
Aa1/AA+
NA

2.74 2.56
023135CF1 AMAZON.COM INC 3.3 04/13/2027 1,750,000.00 04/25/2022

3.34%
1,746,972.50
1,748,302.46

95.89 4.89%
1,678,151.93
12,512.50

0.58%
(70,150.53)
A1/AA
AA2.792.60
46647PCB0 JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 1.578
04/22/2027
500,000.00 08/23/2022

4.64%
449,845.00
474,499.47

93.32 5.77%
466,604.21
1,512.25

0.16%
(7,895.27)
A1/AAA2.81

1.74 927804GH1 VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER CO

3.75 05/15/2027
1,000,000.00 --

3.75%
999,773.40
999,855.79

96.31 5.15%
963,078.66
4,791.67

0.33%
(36,777.13)
A2/BBB+
A

2.87 2.67
14913R3A3 CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES
CORP 3.6 08/12/2027
1,375,000.00 --

3.89%
1,357,243.75
1,363,765.08

96.24 4.91%
1,323,366.72
19,112.50

0.45%
(40,398.36)
A2/A
A+

3.12 2.86
931142EX7 WALMART INC 3.95 09/09/2027 1,500,000.00 --

3.97%
1,498,302.30
1,498,916.86

97.70 4.73%
1,465,552.23
18,433.33

0.50%
(33,364.63)
Aa2/AA
AA

3.19 2.92
89236TKJ3 TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP 4.55
09/20/2027
1,500,000.00 11/22/2022

4.88%
1,479,060.00
1,486,008.28

98.77 4.96%
1,481,608.43
19,147.92

0.51%
(4,399.85)
A1/A+
A+

3.22 2.92
023135CP9 AMAZON.COM INC 4.55 12/01/2027 1,000,000.00 01/17/2023

4.21%
1,014,400.00
1,010,039.61

99.26 4.79%
992,569.69
3,791.67

0.34%
(17,469.92)
A1/AA
AA3.423.12
89115A2M3 TORONTO-DOMINION BANK 5.156
01/10/2028
3,000,000.00 --

5.28%
2,984,380.00
2,987,962.15

99.88 5.19%
2,996,396.73
73,473.00

1.03%
8,434.58
A1/A
AA3.533.11
756109AU8 REALTY INCOME CORP 3.65
01/15/2028
960,000.00 04/10/2023

4.87%
910,540.80
923,225.56

95.18 5.16%
913,734.07
16,157.33

0.31%
(9,491.50)
A3/AWR3.54

3.21 24422EWR6 JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP 4.75
01/20/2028
2,000,000.00 01/23/2023

4.40%
2,030,780.00
2,021,939.84

99.57 4.88%
1,991,479.24
42,486.11

0.68%
(30,460.60)
A1/A
A+

3.56 3.17
06051GGF0 BANK OF AMERICA CORP 3.824
01/20/2028
3,000,000.00 --

5.54%
2,824,349.55
2,883,103.18

96.38 5.85%
2,891,507.10
51,305.33

0.99%
8,403.92
A1/AAA3.56

2.35 37
286

Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
06368LGV2 BANK OF MONTREAL 5.203
02/01/2028
2,000,000.00 08/17/2023

5.56%
1,972,380.00
1,977,734.03
100.15

5.16%
2,002,921.22
43,358.33

0.69%
25,187.19
A2/AAA3.59

3.17 91324PEP3 UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 5.25
02/15/2028
1,500,000.00 02/21/2023

4.90%
1,522,890.00
1,516,562.27
101.30

4.85%
1,519,523.91
29,750.00

0.52%
2,961.64
A2/A+
A

3.63 3.14
46647PAF3 JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 3.54
05/01/2028
2,000,000.00 08/16/2023

5.75%
1,854,340.00
1,888,600.27

95.44 5.72%
1,908,740.12
11,800.00

0.66%
20,139.85
A1/AAA3.84

2.64 58933YBH7 MERCK & CO INC 4.05 05/17/2028 3,500,000.00 --

4.06%
3,497,960.40
3,498,419.00

97.90 4.65%
3,426,391.61
17,325.00

1.18%
(72,027.40)
A1/A+
NA

3.88 3.53
06406RBG1 BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORP

3.992 06/13/2028
1,500,000.00 10/26/2023

6.16%
1,395,930.00
1,415,216.80

96.71 5.52%
1,450,636.16
2,994.00

0.50%
35,419.35
A1/A
AA3.962.74
02665WEM9 AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORP

5.125 07/07/2028
1,370,000.00 10/12/2023

5.60%
1,343,288.50
1,347,296.77
100.46

5.00%
1,376,240.57
33,936.04

0.47%
28,943.80
A3/AA4.02

3.51 78016HZS2 ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 5.2
08/01/2028
2,500,000.00 09/07/2023

5.54%
2,464,100.00
2,470,009.63
100.66

5.02%
2,516,414.88
54,166.67

0.86%
46,405.24
A1/A
AA4.093.57
756109BS2 REALTY INCOME CORP 4.7
12/15/2028
1,300,000.00 --

4.98%
1,285,086.00
1,285,776.49

98.17 5.16%
1,276,256.19
2,715.56

0.44%
(9,520.31)
A3/ANA4.46

3.96 91324PEU2 UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 4.25
01/15/2029
1,000,000.00 01/23/2024

4.61%
984,020.00
985,409.57

97.37 4.90%
973,719.05
19,597.22

0.33%
(11,690.52)
A2/A+
A

4.54 3.99
24422EXH7 JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP 4.5
01/16/2029
2,000,000.00 04/18/2024

5.16%
1,945,100.00
1,947,321.39

98.30 4.92%
1,966,034.22
43,250.00

0.67%
18,712.83
A1/A
A+

4.55 3.97
91159HJK7 US BANCORP 4.653 02/01/2029 1,250,000.00 04/11/2024

5.66%
1,207,450.00
1,209,812.18

97.85 5.58%
1,223,110.64
24,234.38

0.42%
13,298.45
A3/A
A

4.59 3.19
17275RBR2 CISCO SYSTEMS INC 4.85
02/26/2029
1,565,000.00 02/21/2024

4.86%
1,564,452.25
1,564,490.03

99.98 4.85%
1,564,723.90
26,355.03

0.54%
233.88
A1/AANA4.66

4.06 61747YFD2 MORGAN STANLEY 5.164
04/20/2029
2,250,000.00 05/30/2024

5.44%
2,228,212.50
2,228,688.14

99.68 5.58%
2,242,697.96
22,915.25

0.77%
14,009.82
A1/AA+4.80

3.38 Total Corporate 78,380,000.00 3.44%
78,097,508.28
77,859,320.12

96.98 5.23%
75,954,351.64
814,612.15

26.08%
(1,904,968.48)
A1/A
A+

2.75 2.36

MONEY MARKET
FUND
38 287

Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
31846V203 FIRST AMER:GVT OBLG Y 356,932.33 -- 356,932.33 1.00 356,932.33 0.12% Aaa/ 0.00

4.92% 356,932.33 4.92% 0.00 0.00 AAAm 0.00
AAA
Aaa/
Total Money Market 356,932.33 1.00 356,932.33 0.12% AAAm 0.00 Fund 356,932.33 4.92% 356,932.33 4.92% 0.00 0.00 AAA 0.00

SUPRANATIONAL
459058JB0 INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR 2,260,000.00 04/15/2020 2,251,253.80 96.39 2,178,472.69 0.75% Aaa/AAA 0.81 RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPM 0.70% 2,258,587.00 5.23% 2,711.62 (80,114.31) NA 0.79

0.625 04/22/2025
4581X0DN5 INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT 1,685,000.00 01/13/2021 1,692,329.75 95.45 1,608,302.76 0.55% Aaa/AAA 1.04 BANK 0.625 07/15/2025 0.53% 1,686,691.82 5.17% 4,856.08 (78,389.06) NA 1.01 459058JL8 INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR 6,000,000.00 -- 5,986,632.00 94.26 5,655,439.68 1.94% Aaa/AAA 1.33 RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPM 0.55% 5,996,264.92 5.02% 5,250.00 (340,825.24) NA 1.29

0.5 10/28/2025
4581X0DV7 INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT 4,615,000.00 04/13/2021 4,593,863.30 93.15 4,298,832.86 1.48% Aaa/AAA 1.80 BANK 0.875 04/20/2026 0.97% 4,607,383.38 4.88% 7,964.08 (308,550.52) NA 1.75 459058KT9 INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR 5,000,000.00 -- 4,813,059.00 96.35 4,817,704.75 1.65% Aaa/AAA 4.03 RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPM 4.35% 4,846,508.87 4.50% 82,152.78 (28,804.12) NA 3.65

3.5 07/12/2028
45950KDD9 INTERNATIONAL FINANCE CORP 4.5 1,605,000.00 07/06/2023 1,603,218.45 100.04 1,605,608.47 0.55% Aaa/AAA 4.04 07/13/2028 4.53% 1,603,563.64 4.49% 33,705.00 2,044.83 NA 3.58 4581X0DC9 INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT 3,360,000.00 -- 3,187,150.40 94.71 3,182,365.74 1.09% Aaa/AAA 4.22 BANK 3.125 09/18/2028 4.33% 3,207,822.00 4.51% 30,041.67 (25,456.26) NA 3.85 4581X0EN4 INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT 3,000,000.00 02/15/2024 2,970,690.00 98.60 2,957,929.74 1.02% Aaa/AAA 4.63 BANK 4.125 02/15/2029 4.34% 2,972,813.45 4.46% 51,906.25 (14,883.71) NA 4.09 27,098,196.70 95.61 26,304,656.69 9.03% Aaa/AAA 2.73
Total Supranational 27,525,000.00 2.45% 27,179,635.09 4.77% 218,587.47 (874,978.40) NA 2.50

US TREASURY
39 288

Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
91282CFP1 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.25
10/15/2025
1,500,000.00 --

4.24%
1,500,431.56
1,500,212.94

99.06 5.00%
1,485,937.50
13,411.89

0.51%
(14,275.44)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

1.29 1.23
91282CBH3 UNITED STATES TREASURY 0.375
01/31/2026
3,000,000.00 02/23/2021

0.58%
2,970,468.75
2,990,511.32

93.20 4.89%
2,795,976.57
4,697.80

0.96%
(194,534.75)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

1.59 1.54
91282CBQ3 UNITED STATES TREASURY 0.5
02/28/2026
2,500,000.00 03/26/2021

0.83%
2,459,960.94
2,486,475.40

93.12 4.84%
2,327,929.70
4,177.99

0.80%
(158,545.70)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

1.67 1.62
91282CBT7 UNITED STATES TREASURY 0.75
03/31/2026
5,000,000.00 --

0.85%
4,974,804.69
4,991,167.27

93.26 4.81%
4,662,890.60
9,426.23

1.60%
(328,276.67)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

1.75 1.70
91282CCF6 UNITED STATES TREASURY 0.75
05/31/2026
2,000,000.00 06/18/2021

0.90%
1,985,000.00
1,994,191.14

92.74 4.76%
1,854,765.62
1,270.49

0.64%
(139,425.52)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

1.92 1.86
91282CCW9 UNITED STATES TREASURY 0.75
08/31/2026
2,000,000.00 08/30/2021

0.77%
1,998,515.63
1,999,356.99

91.97 4.69%
1,839,375.00
5,013.59

0.63%
(159,981.99)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

2.17 2.10
91282CDG3 UNITED STATES TREASURY 1.125
10/31/2026
5,000,000.00 --

1.25%
4,970,498.06
4,985,944.01

92.29 4.65%
4,614,257.80
9,476.90

1.58%
(371,686.21)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

2.34 2.25
912828Z78 UNITED STATES TREASURY 1.5
01/31/2027
4,500,000.00 --

2.15%
4,367,285.16
4,428,388.88

92.55 4.59%
4,164,609.38
28,186.81

1.43%
(263,779.51)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

2.59 2.47
91282CEN7 UNITED STATES TREASURY 2.75
04/30/2027
7,000,000.00 --

3.55%
6,761,484.38
6,854,844.19

95.27 4.54%
6,669,140.66
32,432.07

2.29%
(185,703.53)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

2.83 2.67
91282CEW7 UNITED STATES TREASURY 3.25
06/30/2027
9,000,000.00 --

3.22%
9,018,066.41
9,008,407.22

96.49 4.51%
8,683,945.29
794.84

2.98%
(324,461.93)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

3.00 2.82
91282CFM8 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.125
09/30/2027
10,000,000.00 --

3.95%
10,074,062.50
10,050,281.63

98.87 4.50%
9,886,718.80
103,688.52

3.39%
(163,562.83)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

3.25 2.98
91282CGC9 UNITED STATES TREASURY 3.875
12/31/2027
10,000,000.00 --

3.70%
10,078,828.13
10,055,970.22

98.08 4.47%
9,808,203.10
1,052.99

3.37%
(247,767.12)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

3.50 3.23
91282CGT2 UNITED STATES TREASURY 3.625
03/31/2028
7,000,000.00 --

3.58%
7,014,042.96
7,010,751.32

97.19 4.45%
6,803,125.00
63,784.15

2.34%
(207,626.32)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

3.75 3.43
91282CHE4 UNITED STATES TREASURY 3.625
05/31/2028
4,500,000.00 --

4.07%
4,412,773.44
4,430,240.65

97.15 4.42%
4,371,855.48
13,816.60

1.50%
(58,385.17)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

3.92 3.59
91282CHQ7 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.125
07/31/2028
9,000,000.00 --

4.51%
8,848,203.13
8,872,581.69

98.94 4.41%
8,904,726.54
155,027.47

3.06%
32,144.85
Aaa/AA+
AA+

4.08 3.66
91282CJA0 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.625
09/30/2028
3,750,000.00 --

4.92%
3,702,089.84
3,708,805.61
100.85

4.40%
3,781,787.10
43,596.31

1.30%
72,981.49
Aaa/AA+
AA+

4.25 3.78
40 289

Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
91282CJN2 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.375
11/30/2028
5,500,000.00 --

4.03%
5,584,941.41
5,576,033.35

99.98 4.38%
5,499,140.63
20,380.81

1.89%
(76,892.72)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

4.42 3.96
91282CJR3 UNITED STATES TREASURY 3.75
12/31/2028
5,500,000.00 --

4.00%
5,438,359.38
5,443,815.92

97.45 4.38%
5,359,492.16
560.46

1.84%
(84,323.76)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

4.50 4.09
91282CKD2 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.25
02/28/2029
13,000,000.00 --

4.44%
12,891,953.13
12,896,328.22

99.55 4.36%
12,941,601.53
184,667.12

4.44%
45,273.31
Aaa/AA+
AA+

4.67 4.13
91282CKP5 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.625
04/30/2029
12,250,000.00 --

4.42%
12,359,384.76
12,358,823.14
101.15

4.36%
12,390,683.66
95,453.46

4.25%
31,860.52
Aaa/AA+
AA+

4.83 4.27
Total US Treasury 122,000,000.00 3.50%
121,411,154.26
121,643,131.12

97.49 4.49%
118,846,162.11
790,916.50

40.80%
(2,796,969.01)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

3.56 3.24
Total Portfolio 299,433,806.68 3.32%
298,322,611.65
298,206,582.00

97.07 4.84%
291,266,941.23
2,031,615.68
100.00%
(6,939,640.77)
Aa2/AAAA3.03

2.57 Total Market Value +
Accrued 293,298,556.91
41 290

HOLDINGS REPORT
City of Dublin Reporting Account | As of June 30, 2024
Cusip Security Description Par Value/
Units
Purchase
Date
Purchase
Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.

Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
CASH
CCYUSD Receivable 293,968.95 --

0.00%
293,968.95
293,968.95

1.00 0.00%
293,968.95

0.00 0.21%

0.00 Aaa/AAA
AAA

0.00 0.00
Total Cash 293,968.95 0.00%
293,968.95
293,968.95

1.00 0.00%
293,968.95

0.00 0.21%

0.00 Aaa/AAA
AAA

0.00 0.00
LAIF
90LAIF$00 Local Agency Investment Fund State
Pool
27,087,152.90 --

4.56%
27,087,152.90
27,087,152.90

1.00 4.56%
27,087,152.90

0.00 19.10%

0.00 NA/NA
NA

0.00 0.00
Total LAIF 27,087,152.90 4.56%
27,087,152.90
27,087,152.90

1.00 4.56%
27,087,152.90

0.00 19.10%

0.00 NA/NA
NA

0.00 0.00

LOCAL GOV

INVESTMENT POOL
90CAMP$00 CAMP 114,468,288.08 --

5.44%
114,468,288.08
114,468,288.08

1.00 5.44%
114,468,288.08

0.00 80.70%

0.00 NA/AAAm
AAA

0.00 0.00
Total Local Gov
Investment Pool 114,468,288.08 5.44%
114,468,288.08
114,468,288.08

1.00 5.44%
114,468,288.08

0.00 80.70%

0.00 NA/
AAAm
AAA

0.00 0.00
Total Portfolio 141,849,409.93 5.26%
141,849,409.93
141,849,409.93

1.00 5.26%
141,849,409.93

0.00 100.00%

0.00 Aaa/AAA
AAA

0.00 0.00
Total Market Value +
Accrued 141,849,409.93
42 291

TRANSACTIONS
43 292

TRANSACTION LEDGER
City of Dublin | Account #10198|04/01/2024 Through 06/30/2024| Transaction
Type
Settlement
Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Acq/DispYield Amount Interest Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss

ACQUISITIONS
Purchase 04/15/2024 91159HJK7 1,250,000.00 US BANCORP 4.653 02/01/2029

96.596 5.47% (1,207,450.00) (11,955.63) (1,219,405.63) 0.00 Purchase 04/17/2024 91282CKD2 3,000,000.00 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.25
02/28/2029

98.113 4.69% (2,943,398.44) (16,630.43) (2,960,028.87) 0.00 Purchase 04/22/2024 24422EXH7 2,000,000.00 JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP 4.5 01/16/2029

97.255 5.16% (1,945,100.00) (26,000.00) (1,971,100.00) 0.00 Purchase 04/25/2024 91282CKD2 3,000,000.00 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.25
02/28/2029

98.246 4.66% (2,947,382.81) (19,402.17) (2,966,784.98) 0.00 Purchase 04/30/2024 91282CKP5 2,000,000.00 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.625
04/30/2029

99.703 4.69% (1,994,062.50) 0.00 (1,994,062.50) 0.00
Purchase 05/16/2024 36269WAD1 1,055,000.00 GMALT 2024-2 A3 5.39 07/20/2027

99.994 5.85% (1,054,938.71) 0.00 (1,054,938.71) 0.00
Purchase 05/20/2024 91282CKP5 3,000,000.00 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.625
04/30/2029
100.813 4.44% (3,024,375.00) (7,540.76) (3,031,915.76) 0.00 Purchase 05/21/2024 437930AC4 1,000,000.00 HONDO-242-A3 5.27 11/20/2028

99.988 5.27% (999,878.50) 0.00 (999,878.50) 0.00
Purchase 05/23/2024 58770JAD6 765,000.00 MBALT 2024-A A3 5.32 01/18/2028

99.988 5.73% (764,910.50) 0.00 (764,910.50) 0.00
Purchase 05/30/2024 756109BS2 300,000.00 REALTY INCOME CORP

4.7 12/15/2028

96.942 5.47% (290,826.00) (6,462.50) (297,288.50) 0.00
Purchase 05/31/2024 61747YFD2 750,000.00 MORGAN STANLEY

5.164 04/20/2029

99.025 5.40% (742,687.50) (4,410.92) (747,098.42) 0.00
Purchase 05/31/2024 61747YFD2 1,500,000.00 MORGAN STANLEY

5.164 04/20/2029

99.035 5.39% (1,485,525.00) (8,821.83) (1,494,346.83) 0.00 Purchase 06/11/2024 096919AD7 1,305,000.00 BMWOT 2024-A A3

5.18 02/26/2029

99.985 5.18% (1,304,801.77) 0.00 (1,304,801.77) 0.00
44 293

99.994 4.93% (1,479,916.97) 0.00 (1,479,916.97) 0.00
Purchase 06/18/2024 47786WAD2 1,110,000.00 JDOT 2024-B A3 5.2 03/15/2029

99.980 5.81% (1,109,783.00) 0.00 (1,109,783.00) 0.00
Purchase 06/27/2024 91282CKP5 6,000,000.00 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.625
04/30/2029
101.238 4.34% (6,074,296.87) (43,736.41) (6,118,033.28) 0.00 Purchase 06/28/2024 91282CKP5 1,250,000.00 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.625
04/30/2029
101.332 4.32% (1,266,650.39) (9,268.85) (1,275,919.24) 0.00 Total Purchase 30,765,000.00 (30,635,983.96) (154,229.50) (30,790,213.46) 0.00 TOTAL
ACQUISITIONS 30,765,000.00 (30,635,983.96) (154,229.50) (30,790,213.46) 0.00

DISPOSITIONS
Call
Redemption
05/30/2024 61747YEA9 (3,040,000.00) MORGAN STANLEY

0.79 05/30/2025
100.000 0.79% 3,040,000.00 0.00 3,040,000.00 0.00
Total Call
Redemption (3,040,000.00) 3,040,000.00 0.00 3,040,000.00 0.00 Sale 04/17/2024 91282CBC4 (1,000,000.00) UNITED STATES
TREASURY 0.375
12/31/2025

92.453 0.38% 924,531.25 1,112.64 925,643.89 (75,442.10) Sale 04/17/2024 91282CBH3 (1,000,000.00) UNITED STATES
TREASURY 0.375
01/31/2026

92.105 0.58% 921,054.69 793.27 921,847.96 (75,372.72)
Sale 04/17/2024 91282CFP1 (1,000,000.00) UNITED STATES
TREASURY 4.25
10/15/2025

98.785 4.40% 987,851.56 232.24 988,083.80 (12,313.01)
Sale 04/22/2024 24422ETT6 (2,000,000.00) JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP 2.65 06/24/2024

99.495 2.02% 1,989,900.00 17,372.22 2,007,272.22 (14,560.87) 45 294

BANKS FUNDING CORP

4.5 11/18/2024

99.506 4.55% 5,452,928.80 107,545.00 5,560,473.80 (25,426.30) Sale 05/20/2024 91282CFP1 (3,000,000.00) UNITED STATES
TREASURY 4.25
10/15/2025

98.980 4.40% 2,969,414.06 12,192.62 2,981,606.68 (31,049.80) Sale 06/11/2024 91282CFP1 (1,500,000.00) UNITED STATES
TREASURY 4.25
10/15/2025

98.926 4.29% 1,483,886.72 9,928.28 1,493,815.00 (16,335.26) Sale 06/12/2024 91282CFP1 (750,000.00) UNITED STATES
TREASURY 4.25
10/15/2025

98.977 4.29% 742,324.22 5,051.23 747,375.45 (7,786.55)
Sale 06/27/2024 3135G0X24 (4,200,000.00) FEDERAL NATIONAL

MORTGAGE
ASSOCIATION 1.625
01/07/2025

98.069 1.69% 4,118,898.00 32,229.17 4,151,127.17 (90,758.01) Sale 06/27/2024 91282CFP1 (1,000,000.00) UNITED STATES
TREASURY 4.25
10/15/2025

99.070 4.29% 990,703.13 8,476.78 999,179.91 (9,440.04)
Sale 06/28/2024 91282CFP1 (1,250,000.00) UNITED STATES
TREASURY 4.25
10/15/2025

99.063 4.29% 1,238,281.25 10,741.12 1,249,022.37 (11,897.33) Total Sale (22,180,000.00) 21,819,773.68 205,674.57 22,025,448.25 (370,381.98) TOTAL
DISPOSITIONS (25,220,000.00) 24,859,773.68 205,674.57 25,065,448.25 (370,381.98) 46 295

IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES
City of Dublin | As of June 30, 2024
2024 Chandler Asset Management, Inc, An Independent Registered Investment Adviser.

Information contained herein is confidential. Prices are provided by ICE Data Services Inc (“IDS”), an independent pricing source. In the event IDS does not provide a price or if the price provided is not reflective of fair market value, Chandler will obtain pricing from an alternative approved third party pricing source in accordance with our written valuation policy and procedures. Our valuation procedures are also disclosed in Item 5 of our Form ADV Part 2A.

Performance results are presented gross-of-advisory fees and represent the client’s Total Return. The deduction of advisory fees lowers performance results. These results include the reinvestment of dividends and other earnings. Past performance may not be indicative of future results. Therefore, clients should not assume that future performance of any specific investment or investment strategy will be profitable or equal to past performance levels. All investment strategies have the potential for profit or loss. Economic factors, market conditions or changes in investment strategies, contributions or withdrawals may materially alter the performance and results of your portfolio.

Index returns assume reinvestment of all distributions. Historical performance results for investment indexes generally do not reflect the deduction of transaction and/or custodial charges or the deduction of an investment management fee, the incurrence of which would have the effect of decreasing historical performance results. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.

Source ICE Data Indices, LLC (“ICE”), used with permission. ICE permits use of the ICE indices and related data on an “asis” basis; ICE, its affiliates and their respective third party suppliers disclaim any and all warranties and representations, express and/or implied, including any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose or use, including the indices, index data and any data included in, related to, or derived therefrom. Neither ICE data, its affiliates or their respective third party providers guarantee the quality, adequacy, accuracy, timeliness or completeness of the indices or the index data or any component thereof, and the indices and index data and all components thereof are provided on an “as is” basis and licensee’s use it at licensee’s own risk. ICE data, its affiliates and their respective third party do not sponsor, endorse, or recommend chandler asset management, or any of its products or services.

This report is provided for informational purposes only and should not be construed as a specific investment or legal advice. The information contained herein was obtained from sources believed to be reliable as of the date of publication, but may become outdated or superseded at any time without notice. Any opinions or views expressed are based on current market conditions and are subject to change. This report may contain forecasts and forward-looking statements which are inherently limited and should not be relied upon as indicator of future results. Past performance is not indicative of future results. This report is not intended to constitute an offer, solicitation, recommendation or advice regarding any securities or investment strategy and should not be regarded by recipients as a substitute for the exercise of their own judgment.

Fixed income investments are subject to interest, credit and market risk. Interest rate risk: the value of fixed income investments will decline as interest rates rise. Credit risk: the possibility that the borrower may not be able to repay interest and principal. Low rated bonds generally have to pay higher interest rates to attract investors willing to take on greater risk. Market risk: the bond market in general could decline due to economic conditions, especially during periods of rising interest rates.

Ratings information have been provided by Moody’s, S&P and Fitch through data feeds we believe to be reliable as of the date of this statement, however we cannot guarantee its accuracy.

Security level ratings for U.S. Agency issued mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”) reflect the issuer rating because the securities themselves are not rated. The issuing U.S. Agency guarantees the full and timely payment of both principal and interest and carries a AA+/Aaa/AAA by S&P, Moody’s and Fitch respectively. 47 296

BENCHMARK DISCLOSURES
City of Dublin | As of June 30, 2024
Benchmark Disclosure
ICE BofA 1-5 Yr US Treasury & Agency Index The ICE BofA 1-5 Year US Treasury & Agency Index tracks the performance of US dollar denominated US Treasury and nonsubordinated US agency debt issued in the US domestic market. Qualifying securities must have an investment grade rating (based on an average of Moody’s, S&P and Fitch). Qualifying securities must have at least one year remaining term to final maturity and less than five years remaining term to final maturity, at least 18 months to maturity at time of issuance, a fixed coupon schedule, and a minimum amount outstanding of $1 billion for sovereigns and $250 million for agencies. 48 297