Eastvale City Council
October 26, 2022

PROJECT TYPE: Capital Improvements Project
PROJECT NAME: Limonite Gap Closure
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Project will connect from 2,450 LF east of Hellman Ave to Archibald Avenue. The total length of the proposed project is approximately 3,200 LF including a bridge over the Cucamonga Creek. Both road and bridge will serve 4 lanes of traffic including bicycle and pedestrian facilities. A separate pedestrian bridge over the Cucamonga Creek little south of the proposed vehicular bridge, as shown on the below map, is also part of this project.

PROJECT STATUS: 95% plans and specifications under review.

Construction Management service procured.

Working with various agencies to obtain necessary permits.

PROJECT SCHEDULE: Design contract award date - May 22, 2019 30% design completed - December 2019
NOD filed - December 2020
90% design - November 2021
Estimated 100% design - Late 2022
PROJECT MAP:

Proposed Limonite Ave Bridge
Proposed Pedestrian Bridge
211

EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS

PROJECT UPDATES

PROJECT TYPE: Capital Improvements Project
PROJECT NAME: Improvement of Bike Network Connectivity/ATP Trails PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Project will design and construct nearly 5 miles of trails running along Scholar Way and Harrison Avenue. The project will provide dedicated space for people to bike and walk from north Eastvale to the Santa Ana River Trail on the south.

PROJECT STATUS: Design contract was awarded to Mark Thomas. Preliminary design work has started. Community outreach meeting was held January 22, 2022. Currently working with Caltrans to approve scope change to change from Class IV with lane reduction to Class I with no lane reduction.

PROJECT SCHEDULE: Mark Thomas is performing Phase 1B efforts consisting of preliminary design and public outreach.

PROJECT MAP:

212

EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS

PROJECT UPDATES

PROJECT TYPE: Capital Improvements Project
PROJECT NAME: Schleisman Road Safety and Connectivity Project PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Project will design and construct dedicated space for people to bike and walk along Schleisman Road between Hamner Avenue and Sumner Avenue.

PROJECT STATUS: Conceptual development contract was awarded to Conceptual Design & Planning Company.

PROJECT SCHEDULE: Once conceptual plan is completed, City will solicit proposals for development of plans and specifications.

PROJECT MAP:

213

EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS

PROJECT UPDATES

PROJECT TYPE: Capital Improvements Project
PROJECT NAME: Limonite Avenue Signal Synchronization
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Project will design and install necessary equipment to synchronize traffic signals along Limonite Avenue.

PROJECT STATUS: Construction contract was award to Belco on May 11, 2022 to install necessary infrastructure to synchronize the traffic signals.

PROJECT SCHEDULE: There is a long lead time on the necessary materials to connect the traffic signals with fiber-optic. As an interim solution, City has successfully synchronized the traffic signal suing wireless radios. The construction to install fiber communications is expected to start late 2022.

PROJECT MAP:

214

EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS

PROJECT UPDATES

PROJECT TYPE: Capital Improvements Project
PROJECT NAME: Citywide Retroreflective Backplate on Traffic Signal Indicator PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Project will design and install retroreflective backplate borders along backplates of traffic signal indicators at 29 signalized intersections to improve the visibility of signals.

PROJECT STATUS: Plans and Specifications have been completed.

PROJECT SCHEDULE: The construction is estimated to be commence in late 2022.

PROJECT MAP:

215

EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS

PROJECT UPDATES

PROJECT TYPE: Capital Improvements Project
PROJECT NAME: Traffic Signal Dilemma Zone Detection and Mitigation PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Project will install advanced dilemma zone detection system and associated equipment in existing traffic signal cabinets at 16 signalized intersections to modify signal timing to improve safety for motorists approaching intersections.

PROJECT STATUS: 90% Plans and Specifications have been completed.

PROJECT SCHEDULE: The construction is estimated to be commence in late 2022.

PROJECT MAP:

216

EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS

PROJECT UPDATES

PROJECT TYPE: Capital Improvements Project
PROJECT NAME: ADA Transition Plan
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Program includes preparation and implementation of an ADA Self Evaluation Plan as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Future year funding will support removal of ADA barriers as identified in the Plan. Annual program to provide improvements focusing on ADA accessibility, including curb ramps and sidewalks throughout the City.

PROJECT SCHEDULE: This is an on-going project. Currently, field work to identify ADA barriers on City streets including curb ramps and sidewalks is on hold.

217

EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS

PROJECT UPDATES

PROJECT TYPE: Capital Improvements Project
PROJECT NAME: Traffic Sign Inventory
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project will improve roadway safety and traffic through upgrades to existing and/or adding new high-visibility traffic signs.

PROJECT SCHEDULE: Inventory of traffic sign has been completed. Currently, field work to collect reflectivity of signs to meet MUTCD has been completed.

218

EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS

PROJECT UPDATES

PROJECT TYPE: Capital Improvements Project
PROJECT NAME: Archibald Avenue/Limonite Avenue Widening Project PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Street widening and safety project for Archibald Avenue from the City of Ontario limits south of the SCE easement, including the intersection at Limonite Avenue and portions of Limonite Avenue east and west of the intersection. The project looks to improve safety and overall circulation in conjunction with the improvements associated with the Homestead and Merge developments, and Limonite Gap Project. Components of the project include, but are not limited to, coordinating with SCE to relocate SCE high-tension support structures.

PROJECT STATUS: • City approved the proposed design plan from SCE on July 14, 2021. • Construction is estimated to be completed late 2022.

PROJECT MAP:

LIMONITE AVE

ARCHIBALD AVE
219

EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS

PROJECT UPDATES

PROJECT TYPE: Residential Development
PROJECT NAME: Prado (TR 35751)
PROJECT LOCATION: Southeast corner of Schleisman Road and Cucamonga Flood Channel PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Improvements include a development of a gated community of 243 attached and detached single-family homes on approximately 19 acres.

PROJECT STATUS: Improvements have been completed. Project close-out task is remaining before city council accepts the project as complete.

PROJECT MAP:

SCHLEISMAN RD
220

EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS

PROJECT UPDATES

PROJECT TYPE: Commercial Development
PROJECT NAME: The Merge
PROJECT LOCATION: Northeast corner of Limonite Avenue and Archibald Avenue PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Improvements includes 26 gross acres.

PROJECT STATUS: Onsite and offsite improvements ongoing PROJECT MAP:

ARCHIBALD AVE

LIMONITE AVE
221

EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS

PROJECT UPDATES

PROJECT TYPE: Commercial Development
PROJECT NAME: The Ranch by Transwestern
PROJECT NUMBER: PW19-11322
PROJECT LOCATION: East end of Limonite Avenue west of the Cucamonga Creek PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Improvements include 20 gross acres including 2 light industrial warehouses.

PROJECT STATUS: Onsite and offsite improvements ongoing PROJECT MAP:

CUCAMONGA CREEK

HELLMAN AVE
222

EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS

PROJECT UPDATES

PROJECT TYPE: Commercial Development
PROJECT NAME: Homestead
PROJECT NUMBER: PW20-10052
PROJECT LOCATION: Northwest corner of Limonite Avenue and Archibald Avenue PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Improvements include 55.86 gross acres consisting of six industrial buildings
PROJECT STATUS: Onsite and offsite improvements ongoing PROJECT MAP:

LIMONITE AVE

ARCHIBALD AVE
223

EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS

PROJECT UPDATES

PROJECT TYPE: Commercial Development
PROJECT NAME: Vantage Point Church
PROJECT NUMBER: PW15-1174
PROJECT LOCATION: Northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Prado Basin Park Road PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Improvements include development of an approximately 85,000 sq. ft. church which includes a sanctuary, classrooms, cafe, and a bookstore on 10.43 acres.

PROJECT STATUS: Onsite improvement ongoing
PROJECT MAP:

224

EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS

PROJECT UPDATES

PROJECT TYPE: Commercial Development
PROJECT NAME: Hamner Place
PROJECT NUMBER: PW18-10712
PROJECT LOCATION: East of Hamner Avenue and Schleisman Road PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Improvements include 21.48 gross acres.

PROJECT STATUS: Onsite improvement ongoing
PROJECT MAP:

HAMNER AVE
225

EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS

PROJECT UPDATES

PROJECT TYPE: Commercial Development
PROJECT NAME: The Campus Business Park
PROJECT NUMBER: PW12-0750
PROJECT LOCATION: West side of Archibald Avenue south of Limonite Avenue PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Improvements includes 53.37 gross acres with 11 development parcels and 6 letter lots.

PROJECT STATUS: Public improvements completed. Project close-out task is remaining before city council accepts the project as complete.

PROJECT MAP:

ARCHIBALD AVE
226

AGENCY GRANT NAME PROJECT NAME GRANT AWARD MATCH DUE DATE STATUS CTC/
Caltrans
Active Transportation Project Improvement of Bike Network Connectivity
$ 6,471,000.00 $ 1,620,000.00 6/30/2025 Under design CTC/
Caltrans
Local Partnership Program Limonite Gap Closure Project 9,475,000.00$ -$ Award construction by June 2023
Grant request has been
approved. Allocation for
construction funds will be
requested in late 2022.

CTC/
Caltrans
Active Transportation Project Southeast Eastvale Safe Routes to School Gap Closures
1,420,000.00$ -$ Construction in FY22/23
Grant request has been
approved
Caltrans Highway Safety Improvement
Program (HSIP) Cycle 10
Advanced Dilemma Zone
Detection
712,800.00$ -$ Under design
Caltrans Highway Safety Improvement
Program (HSIP) Cycle 10
Retroflective Backplate for
Signals
278,100.00$ -$ Under design
CalRecycle Rubberized Pavement Grant
TRP 13
Annual Overlay Project $ 174,999.00 $ - April 1, 2023 Grant request has been approved
RCTC SB821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety
Enhancement on Citrus St,
Sumner Ave and River Rd
$ 432,500.00 $ 469,953.00 Under construction as part of the Annual Overlay Project
CAL FIRE Resource Management Grant City of Eastvale Urban Foresty Management
$ 249,925.00 $ 60,024.00 March 30, 2024 Grant request has been approved
Caltrans Highway Safety Improvement
Program (HSIP) Cycle 11
Systemic Roadway and
Intersection Safety
Improvement
2,375,640.00$ 263,960.00$ September 12, 2022 Grant application has been submitted
Caltrans Highway Safety Improvement
Program (HSIP) Cycle 11
Traffic Signal Coordination and
Raised Pavement Markers
589,000.00$ 589,000.00$ September 12, 2022 Grant application has been submitted

PUBLIC WORKS GRANTS SUMMARY

AWARDED GRANTS

FUTURE GRANTS
227

AGENDA STAFF REPORT

City Council Meeting

CONSENT CALENDAR

Agenda Item No. 11.6
October 26, 2022
City of Eastvale Crime Statistics – August 2022
Prepared By:

Eva Terekhova, Emergency Management Specialist
Recommended Action(s)
Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the Eastvale Crime Sta s
cs for August
2022.

Summary
The City Council requested staff to collaborate with the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department to develop a crime sta
s
cs document that would reflect selected Part I and Part II crime data for the City of Eastvale. Intended to show month-to-month crime sta s
cs, the document will assist in
determining appropriate staffing levels for law enforcement services.

Background
In May 2017, City Council directed staff to coordinate with the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department to request and obtain monthly crime sta
s
cs for the City of Eastvale. The primary
intent of the request was to determine appropriate staffing levels during the City’s contract nego
a
ons with the Sheriff’s Department. Over several weeks, the city manager and staff worked collabora
vely with Riverside County Sheriff’s Department administra on and management to
obtain crime statistics that could be shared with the public on a regular basis.

Upon receiving the data, the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department advised staff that the data provided would be reflec
ve of the previous month, or thirty days behind the current month; and that the report would need to include a disclaimer identifying the data as preliminary and raw.

At the July 26, 2017 mee
ng, City Council recommended that staff add columns reflec ve of felony
and misdemeanor arrests. During the September 26, 2017 mee ng, City Council recommended staff
add traffic viola
ons/cita
ons data and the total calls for service broken down per month. Crime 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752 951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
228
sta
s
cs that were released in the
me that passed since the last mee
ng of the City Council are
attached.

Environmental
Crime sta
s
cs are not a project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and no environmental review is required.

Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: N/A
| Target #: N/A
| Goal #: N/A
N/A
Fiscal Impact
This request has no fiscal impact.

Prior City Council/Commission Action
July 25, 2017: Approved by the Public Safety Commission September 26, 2017: Approved by City Council
Attachment(s)
Attachment - August 2022 Eastvale Crime Statistics.pdf

12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
229
City of Eastvale
Crime Statistics
August 2022

Violent Crime Statistics

VIOLENT CRIMES
ESTIMATED 2022 POPULATION = 69,929

AUG
2022
CRIME
RATE
PER
1000
AUG
2021
CRIME
RATE
PER
1000
JUL
2022
CRIME
RATE
PER
1000
JUN
2022
CRIME
RATE
PER
1000
MAY
2022
CRIME
RATE
PER
1000
YEAR
TO
DATE
2022
YEAR
TO
DATE
2021
YEAR
END
TOTAL
2020
HOMICIDE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
RAPE 0 0 0 0 1 0.01 0 0 0 0 5 2 3
ROBBERY 2 0.03 4 0.06 5 0.07 2 0.03 0 0 17 23 22

AGGRAVATED
ASSAULT 5 0.07 2 0.03 6 0.09 5 0.07 5 0.07 50 51 54
ARSON 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2

TOTAL 7 N/A 6 N/A 12 N/A 7 N/A 5 N/A 72 72 82

YEAR POPULATION TOTAL CALLS FOR
SERVICE/FILE #S
2021 67,626 25,104
2020 66,413 23,778
2019 66,078 24,587
2018 64,855 28,383
2017 64,613 32,295
2016 63,214 31,234
LEGEND
 All data is preliminary, pending year end verification by CA-DOJ and FBI.

The numbers presented here are raw statistics based on the information currently in the Records Management System (RMS).
 Source of population data: State of California, Department of Finance  “Total calls for service/file #s generated” encompass ALL call types inclusive of the ones listed and not listed on this chart.
 Year to Date (YTD) is calendar year
TOTAL CALLS FOR SERVICE/FILE #S GENERATED
YEAR: 2022 POPULATION: 69,929 TOTAL YTD: 17,985

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
1,659 2,152 2,076 2,264 2,204 2,417 2,645 2,568
Non-Violent Crime Statistics

PROPERTY CRIMES
ESTIMATED 2022 POPULATION = 69,929

AUG
2022
CRIME
RATE
PER
1000
AUG
2021
CRIME
RATE
PER
1000
JUL
2022
CRIME
RATE
PER
1000
JUN
2022
CRIME
RATE
PER
1000
MAY
2022
CRIME
RATE
PER
1000
YEAR
TO
DATE
2022

YEAR TO
DATE
2021
YEAR
END
TOTAL
2020
BURGLARY 14 0.20 7 0.10 5 0.07 13 0.19 14 0.20 90 158 127

VEHICLE
THEFT 16 0.23 13 0.19 11 0.16 3 0.04 11 0.16 100 140 140

LARCENY
THEFT 81 1.16 34 0.50 68 0.97 80 1.14 87 1.24 603 601 557 MAIL THEFT 4 0.06 4 0.06 2 0.03 2 0.03 1 0.01 22 69 88 INJURY TCS 12 0.17 13 0.19 5 0.07 14 0.20 17 0.24 82 136 140 FELONY
ARREST 30 0.43 18 0.27 20 0.29 17 0.24 22 0.31 175 227 159

MISDEMEANOR
ARREST 44 0.63 22 0.33 46 0.66 25 0.36 57 0.82 276 243 305

TRAFFIC
CITATIONS 407 5.82 454 6.71 515 7.36 239 3.42 185 2.65 2,492 3,674 3,273

TOTAL 608 N/A 565 N/A 672 N/A 393 N/A 394 N/A 3,840 5,248 4,789 230

AGENDA STAFF REPORT

City Council Meeting

CONSENT CALENDAR

Agenda Item No. 11.7
October 26, 2022
Second Amendment to Appendix #1 to the Amended and Restated PSA between WRCOG, Yunex, and City of Eastvale for the WRCOG Regional Streetlight Program
Prepared By:

Jimmy Chung, City Engineer
Recommended Action(s)
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the second amendment to Appendix 1 to the Amended and Restated Professional Services Agreement (PSA) and authorize the City Manager to execute.

Summary
This Second Amendment to Appendix #1 will consist of extending the contract term. The exis(ng agreement expires on December 1, 2022. With the approval of this second amendment, the term of the Original Appendix con(nues in effect to December 1, 2023. Yunex will con(nue to provide rou(ne street light maintenance du(es including repair and replacement of damaged/inoperable fixture material, photocell repair and maintenance, and quarterly review of system opera(on; and extraordinary street light maintenance du(es including 24/7 emergency response and pole knockdown repair.

Background
City staff was involved in discussions with Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG), its consultant teams, and Jurupa Community Services District (JCSD) regarding acquisition of streetlights from Southern California Edison (SCE), and retrofi9ng them to Light-Emi9ng Diode (LED) fixtures.

City Council approved the Agreement Regarding Streetlight Acquisi(on with JCSD and executed the Financing & Implementa(on Agreements with WRCOG for approximately 4,107 streetlight poles. On 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752 951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
231
November 13, 2019, the City Council approved a first amendment to Appendix 1, which consisted of clarifying the CPI adjustment language and adding bracketed language to allow op(onal change orders.

Environmental
Approval of the agreement is categorically exempt from California Environment Quality Act (CEQA) review under the CEQA Guidelines Section 15303.

Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: 3
| Target #: 7
| Goal #: 6
N/A
Fiscal Impact
The city operates approximately 90 Ligh(ng Maintenance District and Illumina(on Districts that generate revenues specific for streetlight maintenance. The districts were transferred from Jurupa Community Services District and the accoun(ng was finalized in this month, October 2022. As a result, budget was not appropriated during the budget process for fiscal year 2022-23. As staff con(nues to analyze street maintenance costs a budget plan will be developed and presented to the City Council during the fiscal year 2022-23 mid-year budget process. As a backup, the city has adequate budget in General Fund account number 100-500-6439 for Street Light Maintenance, however the appropriate revenue source for these costs is within the specific streetlight maintenance districts.

Prior City Council/Commission Action
On May 9, 2018, City Council approved financing and implementa(on agreements to purchase and retrofit Southern California Edison Streetlights (Agenda Item No. 9.4).

On November 13, 2019, City Council approved first amendment to Appendix #1 of the PSA.

Attachment(s)
Attachment - Second Amendment to Appendix 1

12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
232
20323.00002\40703629.2
1 SECOND AMENDMENT TO
APPENDIX #1
City of Eastvale
This Second Amendment to Appendix #1 to the Amended and Restated Western Riverside Council of Governments Professional Service Agreement is made as of this ____ day of _____________, 2022 by and between the Western Riverside Council of Governments, a California public agency ("WRCOG"), Yunex LLC, a Delaware corporation (“Yunex”), and the City of Eastvale (“Member Agency”). The WRCOG, Yunex, and Member Agency are sometimes individually referred to as "Party" and collectively as "Parties."

RECITALS
WHEREAS, the WRCOG and Siemens Industry Inc., Intelligent Traffic Systems, a Delaware corporation (“Siemens Industry”) entered into a Professional Services Agreement (“Original Agreement”) on December 18, 2017.

WHEREAS, the WRCOG and Siemens Industry amended and restated the Original Agreement on March 27, 2018, to include additional language ("Agreement").

WHEREAS, the WRCOG, Siemens Industry, and Member Agency executed Appendix #1 to the Agreement (“Original Appendix”) on June 27, 2018.

WHEREAS, the WRCOG and Siemens Industry entered into the First Amendment of the Agreement on November 22, 2019 to include the transfer and assignment of the Agreement from Siemens Industry to Siemens Mobility, Inc. (“SMI”) and a CPI increase.

WHEREAS, the WRCOG, Siemens Industry, and Member Agency entered into the First Amendment on November 13, 2019 to amend the Original Appendix to include a CPI increase and the transfer and assignment of Appendix #1 from Siemens Industry to SMI.

WHEREAS, by letter dated May 26, 2021, SMI informed the WRCOG of the transfer of its intelligent transportation systems unit to Yunex, and requested the WRCOG’s consent to the transfer of the Agreement to Yunex.

WHEREAS, by letter dated October 27, 2021, countersigned by Member Agency, the WRCOG and Member Agency consented to the transfer of the Agreement to Yunex.

WHEREAS, the WRCOG and Yunex entered into the Second Amendment of the Agreement on ______________, 2022 to extend the term of the Agreement (“Second Amendment to Agreement”).

WHEREAS, the WRCOG,Yunex and Member Agency now wish to enter into this Second Amendment to incorporate extension of the Agreement, and extend the term of the Original Appendix.

TERMS
NOW, THEREFORE the parties enter into this Second Amendment to Appendix:
233
20323.00002\40703629.2
2 1. Term; Incorporation of Second Amendment to Agreement: The term of the Original Appendix, as previously amended, shall continue in effect to December 1, 2023, concurrent with the extension of the term of the Agreement pursuant to the Second Amendment to Agreement, the provisions of which are incorporated herein by reference.

2. Modification: No alteration or variation of the terms of this Second Amendment to the Appendix shall be valid unless made in writing and signed by the parties hereto.

3. Continuation of Existing Provisions: Except as amended by this Second Amendment to the Appendix, all provisions of the Original Appendix, as previously amended, shall remain in full force and effect and shall govern the actions of the parties under this Second Amendment. [SIGNATURE PAGE TO FOLLOW]
234
20323.00002\40703629.2
3 SIGNATURE PAGE TO

SECOND AMENDMENT TO
APPENDIX #1
Dated this ________of __________, 2022.

WRCOG Yunex
By: _______________________________
Kurt Wilson, Executive Director
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Best Best & Krieger LLP
By: _______________________________
General Counsel
By: _______________________________
Name:__________________________
Its:_____________________________
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By: _______________________________
Name:__________________________
Its:_____________________________
Member Agency – City of Eastvale
By: _______________________________
City Manager
ATTEST:

By:________________________________
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By: _______________________________
City Attorney
235

AGENDA STAFF REPORT

City Council Meeting

CONSENT CALENDAR

Agenda Item No. 11.8
October 26, 2022
Authorize The City Manager To Execute The Supplemental
Agreement For The 2022-2023 Community Development Block Grant Program Year.

Prepared By:

Samantha Greven, Management Analyst
Recommended Action(s)
Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute the Supplemental Agreement for the 2022-2023 Community Development Block Grant program year.

Summary
A Supplemental Agreement has been received from the County of Riverside Department of Housing and Workforce Solu*ons (HWS) rega
rding the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) 2022-2023 project:

City of Eastvale Miscellaneous ADA Improvements - $196,130

Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute the Supplemental Agreement for the 2022-2023 Community Development Block Grant program year.

Background
The Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) is a Federally funded block grant program created by Congress in 1974. CDBG grants are awarded to local governments and non-profit sponsors to carry out community development ac*vi*es by providing decent housing, a suitable living environment, and opportuni*es to expand economic opportuni*es, principally for low- and moderate-income persons. CDBG funds are allocated by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to state and local governments on a yearly basis with the goal of developing ac*vi*es directed toward revitalizing neighborhoods, economic development, and providing 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
236
improved community facilities and services.

The City of Eastvale is a Coopera*ng City in the County of Riverside CDBG program. Applica*ons are reviewed by the County of Riverside Department of Housing and Workforce Solu*ons (HWS) to determine eligibility for funding under federal regula*ons. Eligible projects are included in the One Year Ac*on Plan of the County’s Five-Year Consolidated Plan and must be consistent with both Federal and County policy governing the use of CDBG funds.

On December 8th, 2021 City Council authorized City Staff to file an applica*on with the County of Riverside for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) 2022-2023 project year.

The following project was selected:

1. City of Eastvale Miscellaneous ADA Improvements - $196,130

The City of Eastvale will use CDBG funds to pay for costs associated with the construc*on of ADA improvements at various city-owned public facili*es. CDBG funds will be used for design, construc*on, project management, compliance monitoring, and inspec*on/tes*ng costs. City of Eastvale Miscellaneous ADA Improvements.

The aEached Supplemental Agreement and Exhibit-A have been received from the County of Riverside Department of Housing and Workforce Solutions (HWS) regarding the above project.

Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute the Supplemental Agreement for the 2022-2023 Community Development Block Grant program year.

Environmental
Authorizing the execu*on of the Supplemental Agreement for the 2022-2023 CDBG program year is not a project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and no environmental review is required.

Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: 2
| Target #: 5
| Goal #: 7
Improve traffic mobility and management throughout the city's major corridors and around the schools.

Fiscal Impact
The County of Riverside Department of Housing and Workforce Solu*ons (HWS) has agreed to pay the City of Eastvale $196,130 in CDBG funding which can be used for this project. Funds will not be disbursed to the city un*l the project is completed and reimbursement is requested by the city. CIP project 91007, Citywide Americans with Disabili*es Act Transi*on Plan, has $184,000 in available budget under account 250-510-6690. Funds cannot be u*lized un*l the city receives a signed incur cost letter from Riverside County; additional budget will be appropriated at that time.

Prior City Council/Commission Action
On December 8th, 2021 City Council authorized City Staff to file an applica*on with the County of Riverside for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) 2022-2023 project year. 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
237
Attachment(s)
Attachment 1 - Supplemental Agreement

Attachment 2 - Exhibit A

12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
238

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

File No.: 2.EV.21-22

SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR THE USE OF
2022-2023 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS

This Supplemental Agreement (“Agreement”) is entered into this day of ______________, 2022, by and between the COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, a political subdivision of the State of California, herein called, "COUNTY," and the CITY OF EASTVALE, herein called "CITY." COUNTY and CITY are collectively referred to as “Parties” and individually as “Party.” The COUNTY and CITY mutually agree as follows:

1. GENERAL. COUNTY and CITY have executed a Cooperation Agreement, dated November 18, 2020 (“Cooperation Agreement”), whereby CITY elected to participate with COUNTY, which has qualified as an "Urban County" for purposes of receiving Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds (“CDBG”), and to assist and undertake essential community development and housing assistance activities pursuant to the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, Title 1, as amended, Public Law 93-383 hereinafter referred to as "Act." Said Cooperation Agreement, dated November 18, 2020, is incorporated herein by reference and made a part of this Agreement as if each and every provision was set forth herein.

2. PURPOSE. CITY has been allocated $196,130 in CDBG Entitlement funds for the 2022- 2023 CDBG program year. CITY promises and agrees to undertake and assist with the community development activities, within its jurisdiction, by utilizing the sum of $196,130 CDBG Entitlement Funds, as specific ally identified in Exhibit(s) A, attached hereto, and are incorporated herein by this reference, for the following project(s) (collectively, the “Projects”):

2.EV.21-22 City of Eastvale Miscellaneous ADA Improvements, $196,130.

3. TERM OF AGREEMENT . The term of this Agreement for the implementation of the Project(s) shall be for a period of one (1) year from July 1, 2022, to termination on June 30, 2023.

4. COMPLETION SCHEDULE. CITY shall proceed consistent with the completion schedule set forth in Exhibit(s) A, attached hereto and incorporated herein.

5. EXTENSION OF TIME. In the event the Project(s) are not substantially completed by the 239

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

time set forth in the applicable completion schedule(s) due to a force majeure event (See Section 40 below), the COUNTY may consider extending the schedule for the completion of the project(s). Times of performance for other activities may also be extended in writing by COUNTY. If substantial progress toward completion in conformance with the completion schedule, as determined by COUNTY in its discretion, of the project(s) not made during the term of this Supplemental Agreement, COUNTY may suspend or terminate this Supplemental Agreement pursuant to the termination procedures set forth in the section titled "Terminati on," and the entitlement funds associated with the Project(s) may be reprogrammed by the COUNTY after appropriate notice is provided to the City.

6. LETTER TO PROCEED . CITY shall not initiate nor incur expenses for the CDBG - funded Projects or activities c overed under the terms of this Supplemental Agreement as set forth in Exhibit(s) A, attached hereto, prior to receiving written authorization from COUNTY to proceed.

7. NOTICES. Each notice, request, demand, consent, approval or other communication (hereinafter in this Section referred to collectively as “notices” and referred to singly as a “notice”) which the CITY or COUNTY is required or permitted to give to the other party pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been d uly and sufficiently given if: (a) personally delivered with proof of delivery thereof (any notice so delivered shall be deemed to have been received at the time so delivered); or (b) sent by Federal Express (or other similar national overnight courier) designating early morning delivery (any notice so delivered shall be deemed to have been received on the next Business Day following receipt by the courier); or (c) sent by United States registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, at a post office regularly maintained by the United States Postal Service (any notice so sent shall be deemed to have been received two days after mailing in the United States), addressed to the respective parties as follows:

COUNTY CITY
Heidi Marshall, Director Henry Garcia, Interim City Manager Riverside County HWS City of Eastvale
P.O. Box 1528 12363 Limonite Avenue Suite 910
Riverside, CA 92502 Eastvale, CA 91752

240

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

8. DISBURSEMENT OF FUNDS.

A. COUNTY's Board of Supervisors shall determine the final disposition and distribution of all funds received by COUNTY under the Act consistent with Sections 2 and 3 of this Supplemental Agreement. COUNTY, through its Department of Housing, and Workforce Sol utions, shall make payment of the CDBG funds to CITY as set forth in the attached Exhibit(s) A. It is the CITY’s responsibility to monitor all project activities set forth in the attached Exhibit(s) A, and to ensure compliance with applicable federal regulations and the terms of this Supplemental Agreement.

B. CITY shall comply with timely drawdown of CDBG Entitlement funding by expeditiously implementing and completing the COUNTY -approved, CDBG -funded Projects. CITY acknowledges that CITY’s drawdown performa nce directly impacts the COUNTY’s overall program drawdown rate. If the CITY’s unobligated CDBG fund balance, as of January 31, 202 3, exceeds one hundred and seventy -five percent (175%) of the CITY’s 202 2-2023 CDBG allocation, the COUNTY may, in its sole discretion, take the necessary administrative actions to reduce the CITY’s CDBG fund balance. Necessary actions include, but are not limited to, reprogramming the excess CDBG fund balance to other eligible activities as selected by COUNTY. COUNTY may, in it s sole and absolute discretion, authorize CITY in writing, prior to January 31, 202 3, to exceed the CDBG fund balance requirement.

C. CITY shall comply with timely drawdown of CDBG funds by submitting monthly requests for reimbursement or other COUNTY ap proved reimbursement schedules. All disbursements of CDBG funds will be on a reimbursement basis and made within thirty (30) days after the COUNTY has received the CITY’s reimbursement request including documentation supporting expenditures.

D. All authori zed obligations incurred in the performance of the Supplemental Agreement for projects eligible under the following CDBG regulations must be reported in writing to COUNTY no later than June 1, 2023:

1. Acquisition [24 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 570.201 (a)]

2. Clearance Activities [24 CFR 570.201 (d)]

3. Interim Assistance [24 CFR 570.201 (f)]

4. Code Enforcement [24 CFR 570.202 (c)]
All public service activities [24 CFR 570.201 (e)] and other eligible activities under this 241

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

Supplemental Agreement must be implemented, completed, and obligations reported in writing to the COUNTY by the CITY no later than the completion schedules set forth in the attached Exhibits to this Supplemental Agreement. ”CFR” as used herein refers to the Code of Federal Regulations.

9. RECORDS AND INSPECTIONS.

A. CITY shall establish and maintain financial, programmatic, statistical, and other supporting records of its operations and financial activities in a ccordance with the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (2 CFR Part 200), and 24 CFR Section 570.502 (a), as they relate to the acceptance and use of federal funds under this Agreement. Said records shall be retained for a period of four (4) years from the date that the activity or program funded with the CDBG Grant is closed out by the COUNTY and reported as complete in the Comprehensive Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER). Exceptions to the four (4) year retention period requirement, pursuant to 2 CFR 200.333 include, but not limited to, the following:
i. if any litigation, claim, or audit is started prior to the expiration of the four (4) year period;
ii. when the CITY is notified i n writing by the COUNTY, HUD, or other Federal agency to extend the retention period;
iii. records for real property and equipment acquired with CDBG funds must be retained for four (4) years after final disposition; iv. when the records are transferred by the CITY to the COUNTY, HUD, or other Federal agency, the four (4) year period is not applicable.

B. CITY shall obtain an external audit in accordance with the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Aw ards (2 CFR Section 200.500). Audits shall usually be performed annually but not less frequently than every two years. Nonprofit institutions and government agencies that expend less than $ 750,000 a year in Federal awards are exempt from Federal audit requirements, but records must be available for review by appropriate officials of the Federal grantor agency or subgranting entity. The audit report shall be submitted to the COUNTY within 180 days after the end of the COUNTY'S fiscal year.

C. CITY shall maintain a separate account for the CITY’S CDBG Entitlement funds 242

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

received as set forth in Exhibit(s) A attached hereto.

D. Pursuant to 2 CFR 200.336, CITY shall, during the normal business hours, make available to COUNTY, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), or other authorized representative, for the examination and copying, all of its records and other materials with respect to matters covered by this Agreement and provide reasonable access to CITY staff for the purpose of interview and discussion related to the records and documents.

E. CITY shall not retain any program income as defined in 24 CFR 570.500. Said program income shall be used only for the activities that are the subject of this Agreement. Further, all provisions of this Agreement shall apply to such activities.

F. The CITY shall ensure that at least fifty -one percent (51%) of the persons benefiting from all CDBG-funded activities or projects designated as serving limited clientele [24 CFR 570.208(a)(2)(i)] are of low and moderate-income and meet the applicable household income guidelines.

The CITY shall provide the required income certification and direct benefit documentation, in writing, to the COUNTY pursuant to the reporting requirement of each activi ty as set forth in Exhibit(s) A, attached hereto. In the event that CITY engages the services of a sub -contractor to implement CDBG - funded activities, the CITY must collect, in writing, all required income certification and direct benefit documentation fro m subcontractors prior to submittal to the COUNTY pursuant to the reporting requirement of each activity as set forth in Exhibit(s) A, attached hereto.

10. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS. CITY shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and ordinances and any amendments thereto and the federal regulations and guidelines now or hereafter enacted pursuant to the Act. More particularly, CITY is to comply with those regulations found in the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Co st Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (2 CFR Part 200), and 24 CFR Part 570 . CITY is to abide by the provisions of the Community Development Block Grant Manual, prepared by COUNTY and cited in the above-mentioned Cooperation Agreement. C ITY shall comply, if applicable, with Section 3 of the Housing & Urban Development Act of 1968 (12 U.S.C.A. Section 1701u), as amended, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit “S”, and incorporated herein by this reference. CITY shall adhere to the regulations as set forth in Exhibit “R”, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, pertaining to inherently religious activities. CITY shall comply with the Additional Federal 243

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

Requirements, if applicable, attached hereto as Exhibit “AFR”, and incorporated herein by this reference.

11. COOPERATION WITH HOUSING ACTIVITIES . CITY shall cooperate with COUNTY in undertaking essential community development and housing assistance activities, specifically urban renewal and public assistance housing , and shall assist COUNTY in implementing and undertaking the goals and strategies identified in the 2019-2024 Five Year Consolidated Plan, pursuant to 24 CFR Part 91 and other requirements of the Community Development Block Grant Program.

12. LEAD AGENCY FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) . Pursuant to Title 14 CCR Section 1501(d), the CITY is designated as the lead agency for the proje cts that are the subject matter of this Supplemental Agreement.

13. HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMNIFICATION. In contemplation of the provisions of Section 895.2 of the California Government Code imposing certain tort liability jointly upon public entities solely by reason of such entities being parties to an agreement as defined by Section 895 of the Code, the Parties hereto, pursuant to the authorization contained in Section 895.4 and 895.6 of the Code, agree that each Party shall be liable for any damages inclu ding, but not limited to, claims, demands, losses, liabilities, costs and expenses including reasonable attorneys ’ fees, resulting from the negligent or wrongful acts or omissions of their employees or agents in the performance of this Agreement, and each Party shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the other Parties from such claims, demands, damages, losses or liabilities for their negligence.

The hold harmless and indemnification obligations set forth herein shall survive the termination and expiration of this Agreement. In the event there is conflict between this clause and California Civil Code Section 2782, this clause shall be interpreted to comply with Civil Code 2782. Such interpretation shall not relieve the CITY from indemnifying the Indemnitees to the fullest extent allowed by law.

14. INSURANCE. Without limiting or diminishing the CITY’s obligation to indemnify or hold the COUNTY harmless, CITY shall procure and maintain or cause to be maintained, at its sole cost and expense, the following insurance coverage’s during the term of this Agreement. As respects to the insurance section only, the COUNTY herein refers to the County of Riverside, its Agencies, Districts, 244

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

Special Districts, and Departments, their respective directors, officers, Board of COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE Supervisors, employees, elected or appointed officials, agents, or representatives as Additional Insureds
a. Workers’ Compensation:

If the CITY has employees as defined by the State of California, the CITY shall maintain statutory Workers' Compensation Insurance (Coverage A) as prescrib ed by the laws of the State of California. Policy shall include Employers’ Liability (Coverage B) including Occupational Disease with limits not less than $1,000,000 per person per accident. The policy shall be endorsed to waive subrogation in favor of the County of Riverside.
b. Commercial General Liability:

Commercial General Liability insurance coverage, including but not limited to, premises liability, contractual liability, products and completed operations liability, personal and advertising injury, and cross liability coverage, covering claims which may arise from or out of CITY’S performance of its obligations hereunder. Policy shall name the County of Riverside as Additional Insured. Policy’s limit of liability shall not be less than $2,000,000 per occurrence combined single limit. If such insurance contains a general aggregate limit, it shall apply separately to this agreement or be no less than two (2) times the occurrence limit.
c. Vehicle Liability:

If vehicles or mobile equipment are used in the performance of the obligations under this Agreement, then CITY shall maintain liability insurance for all owned, non -owned or hired vehicles so used in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence combined single limit. If such insurance contains a general aggregate limit, it shall apply separately to this agreement or be no less than two (2) times the occurrence limit. Policy shall name the County of Riverside as Additional Insured. d. General Insurance Provisions - All lines:
(i). Any insurance carrier providing insurance coverage hereunder shall be admitted to the State of California and have an A M BEST rating of not less than A: VIII (A:8) unless such requirements are waived, in writing, by the County Risk Manager. If the County’s Risk Manager 245

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

waives a requirement for a particular insurer such waiver is only valid for that specific insurer and only for one policy term.
(ii). The CITY must declare its insurance self-insured retentions. If such self- insured retentions exceed $500,000 per occurre nce such retentions shall have the prior written consent of the County Risk Manager before the commencement of operations under this Agreement. Upon notification of self-insured retention unacceptable to the COUNTY, and at the election of the Country’s Risk Manager, CITY’S carriers shall either; 1) reduce or eliminate such self-insured retention as respects this Agreement with the COUNTY, or 2) procure a bond which guarantees payment of losses and related investigations, claims administration, and defense costs and expenses. (iii). CITY shall cause CITY’S insurance carrier(s) to furnish the County of Riverside with either 1) a properly executed original Certificate(s) of Insurance and certified original copies of Endorsements effecting coverage as required herein, and 2) if requested to do so orally or in writing by the County Risk Manager, provide original Certified copies of policies including all Endorsements and all attachments thereto, showing such insurance is in full force and effect. Further, said Certificate(s) and policies of insurance shall contain the covenant of the insurance carrier(s) that thirty (30) days written notice shall be given to the County of Riverside prior to any material modification, cancellation, expiration or reduction in covera ge of such insurance. In the event of a material modification, cancellation, expiration, or reduction in coverage, this Agreement shall terminate forthwith, unless the County of Riverside receives, prior to such effective date, another properly executed original Certificate of Insurance and original copies of endorsements or certified original policies, including all endorsements and attachments thereto evidencing coverage’s set forth herein and the insurance required herein is in full force and effect. CITY shall not commence operations until the COUNTY has been furnished original Certificate (s) of Insurance and certified original copies of endorsements and if requested, certified original policies of insurance including all endorsements and any and all o ther attachments as required in this Section. An individual authorized by the insurance carrier to do so on its behalf shall sign the original endorsements for each policy and the Certificate of Insurance.
246

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

(iv). It is understood and agreed to by the parti es hereto that the CITY’S insurance shall be construed as primary insurance, and the COUNTY'S insurance and/or deductibles and/or self-insured retention’s or self-insured programs shall not be construed as contributory. (v). If, during the term of this Ag reement or any extension thereof, there is a material change in the scope of services; or, there is a material change in the equipment to be used in the performance of the scope of or, the term of this Agreement, including any extensions thereof, exceeds five (5) years, the COUNTY reserves the right to adjust the types of insurance required under this Agreement and the monetary limits of liability for the insurance coverage’s currently required herein, if; in the County Risk Manager's reasonable judgment, the amount or type of insurance carried by the CITY has become inadequate.
(vi). CITY shall pass down the insurance obligations contained herein to all tiers of subcontractors working under this Agreement.
(vii). The insurance requirements contained in this Agreement may be met with a program(s) of self-insurance acceptable to the COUNTY. (viii). CITY agrees to notify COUNTY of any claim by a third party or any incident or event that may give rise to a claim arising from the performance of this Agreement.

15. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR . The CITY is, for purposes relating to this Supplemental Agreement, an independent contracto r and shall not be deemed an employee of the COUNTY. It is expressly understood and agreed that the CITY (including its emplo yees, agents and subcontractor’s) shall in no event be entitled to any benefits to which the COUNTY employees are entitled, including but not limited to overtime, any retirement benefits, worker's compensation benefits, and injury leave or other leave benefits. There shall be no employer-employee relationship between the parties; and the CITY shall hold the COUNTY harmless from any and all claims that may be made against the COUNTY based upon any contention by a third party that an employer-employee relationship exists by reason of this Supplemental Agreement. It is further understood and agreed by the parties that the CITY in the performance of this Supplemental Agreement is subject to the control or direction of the COUNTY merely as to the results to be accomplished and not as to the means and methods for accomplishing the results.
247

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

16. NONDISCRIMINATION. CITY shall abide by 24 CFR Sections 570.601 and 570.602 of Title 24 of the Code of Federal Regulations which requires that no person in the United States shall on the grounds of race, color, national origin, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or veterans status be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity funded in whole or in part with Community Development funds.

CITY shall abide by and include in any subcontracts to perform work under this Supplemental Agreement, the following clause:
"During the performance of this Supplemental Agreement, CITY and its subcontractors shall not unlawfully discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, medical condition, marital status, veterans status, sexual orientation, gender identity, age (over 40) or sex. CITY and subcontractors shall insure that the evaluation and treatment of their employees and applicants for employment are free of such discrimination. CITY and subcontractors shall comply with the provisions of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (California Government Code Section 12900 et seq.). The applicable regulations of the Fair Employment and Housing Commission are implementing California Government Code Section 12990 et seq., set forth in Chapter 1 of Division 4.1 of Title 2 of the California Administrative Code are incorporated into this Agreement by reference and made a part hereof as if set forth in full. CITY and its subcontractors shall give written notice of their obligations under this clause to labor organizations with which they have a collective bargaining or other agreement."

17. PROHIBITION AGAINST CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
A. CITY and its assigns, employees, agents, consultants, officers and elected and appointed offic ials shall become familiar with and shall comply with the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (2 CFR Part 200) and the CDBG regulations prohibiting conflicts of interest contained in 24 CFR 570.611.

B. The Subrecipient shall maintain a written code or standards of conduct that shall govern the performance of its officers, employees or agents engaged in the award and administration of contracts supported by Federal funds.

C. No employee, officer or agent of the Subrecipient shall participate in the 248

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

selection, or in the award, or administration of, a contract supported by Federal funds if a conflict of interest, real or apparent, would be involved.

D. No covered persons who exercise or have exerc ised any functions or responsibilities with respect to CDBG -assisted activities, or who are in a position to participate in a decision-making process or gain inside information with regard to such activities, may obtain a financial interest in any contract, or have a financial interest in any contract, subcontract, or agreement with respect to the CDBG-assisted activity, or with respect to the proceeds from the CDBG -assisted activity, either for themselves or those with whom they have business or immediate family ties, during their tenure or for a period of one (1) year thereafter. For purposes of this paragraph, a “covered person” includes any person who is an employee, agent, consultant, officer, or elected or appointed official of the Grantee, the Subrecipient, or any designated public agency.

E. CITY understands and agrees that no waiver of exception can be granted to the prohibition against conflict of interest except upon written approval of HUD pursuant to 24 CFR 570.611(d). Any request by CITY for an exception shall first be reviewed by COUNTY to determine whether such request is appropriate for submission to HUD in the COUNTY’S sole and absolute discretion. In determining whether such request is appropriate for submission to HUD, COUNTY will consider the factors listed in 24 CFR 570.611(d)(2).

F. Prior to the distribution of any CDBG funding under this Supplemental Agreement, CITY shall provide COUNTY , in writing, a list of all employees, agents, consultants, officers and elected and appointed official s who are in a position to participate in a decision making process, exercise any functions or responsibilities, or gain inside information with respect to the CDBG activities funded under this Agreement. CITY shall also promptly disclose to COUNTY any pot ential conflict, including even the appearance of conflict that may arise with respect to the CDBG activities funded under this Supplemental Agreement.

G. Any violation of this Section 17 shall be deemed a material breach of this Supplemental Agreement, and the Supplemental Agreement shall be immediately terminated by the COUNTY.

18. LOBBYING. CITY certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief, that:
a. No federally-appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf 249

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

of the CITY, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any federal contract, the making of any federal grant, the making of any federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any federal contr act, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
b. If any funds other than federally-appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a member of Congress in connection with this federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the CITY shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions. c. CITY shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all sub -recipients shall ce rtify and disclose accordingly.

This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into.

19. TERMINATION.

A. CITY. CITY may not terminate this Agreement except upon express writ ten consent of COUNTY, pursuant to 2 CFR 200.339 (a)(3).

B. COUNTY. Notwithstanding the provisions of Paragraph 1 9a above, COUNTY may suspend or terminate this Supplemental Agreement upon a ten (10) day written notice to CITY of action being taken and the reason for such action including, but not limited to, the following reasons:
(1) In the event CITY fails to perform the covenants herein contained at such times and in such manner as provided in this Supplemental Agreement; and (2) In the event there i s a conflict with any federal, state or local law, ordinance, regulation or rule rendering any of the provisions of this Supplemental Agreement invalid or untenable; or
(3) In the event the funding from the Department of Housing and Urban Development referred to in Sections 1 and 2 above is terminated or otherwise becomes unavailable. 250

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

C. This Agreement may be terminated and/or funding suspended, in whole or in part, for cause in accordance with the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and A udit Requirements for Federal Awards (2 CFR 200.339). Cause shall be based on the failure of the CITY to materially comply with either the terms or conditions of this Agreement. Upon suspension of funding, the CITY agrees not to incur any costs related thereto, or connected with, any area of conflict from which the COUNTY has determined that suspension of funds is necessary. CITY acknowledges that failure to comply with Federal statutes, regulations, or the terms and conditions of this Agreement may be considered by the COUNTY in evaluating future CDBG and non-CDBG funding applications submitted by CITY.

D. Upon suspension or termination of this Supplemental Agreement, CITY shall return any unencumbered funds which it has been provided by COUNTY. In accepti ng said funds, COUNTY does not waive any claim or cause of action it may have against CITY for breach of this Supplemental Agreement.

E. Reversion of Assets

1. Upon expiration or termination of this Supplemental Agreement, the CITY shall transfer to the C OUNTY any CDBG funds on hand at the time of expiration of the Supplemental Agreement as well as any accounts receivable held by CITY which are attributable to the use of CDBG funds awarded pursuant to this Supplemental Agreement.

2. Any real property under the CITY’S control that was acquired or improved in whole or in part with CDBG funds (including CDBG funds provided to the CITY in the form of a loan) in excess of $25,000 is either:
(i) Used to meet one of the National Objectives pursuant to 24 CFR 570.208 until five years after expiration of this agreement, or for such longer period of time as determined to be appropriate by the COUNTY; or
(ii) Not used in accordance with Clause (i) above, in which event the CITY shall pay the COUNTY an amount equal to the current market value of the property less any portion of the value attributable to expenditures of non -CDBG funds for the acquisition of, or improvement to, the property.

20. PUBLICITY. Any publicity generated by CITY for the Projects funded pursuant to this 251

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

Supplemental Agreement will make reference to the contribution of the C OUNTY, the Department of Housing, and Workforce Solutions, and the Community Development Block Grant Program in making the project possible.

21. PROGRAM MONITORING AND EVALUATION . CITY and its subcontractors shall be monitored and evaluated in terms of its effectiveness and timely compliance with the provisions of this S upplemental Agreement and the effective and efficient achievement of the CDBG National Objectives as set forth in Exhibit(s)A, attached hereto. Quarterly reports shall be due on the last day of the month immediately following the end of the quarter being r eported. The quarterly written reports shall include, but shall not be limited to, the following data elements:

A. Title of program, listing of components, description of activities/operations.

B. The projected goals, indicated numerically, and also the goals achieved (for each report period). In addition, identify by percentage and description, the progress achieved towards meeting the specified goals and identify any problems encountered in meeting goals.

C. If the CDBG-funded activity meets a National Objective under 24 CFR 570.208 (a)(2)(i), CITY will report the following:
1) Total number of direct beneficiaries (clientele served) with household incomes at:
• Above 80% MHI
• Between 50% and 80% MHI (Low-Income)
• Between 30% and 50% MHI (Very Low-Income)
• Less than 30% MHI (Extremely Low-Income)
2) Total number and percent (%) of the clientele served that have household incomes at or below 80% MHI
3) Racial ethnicity of clientele
4) Number of Female-Headed Households
D. CITY shall report, in writing, and cause its subcontractors to report, in writing, beneficiary statistics monthly to Housing and Workforce Solutions (HWS) on the pre-approved Direct Benefit Form and Self-Certification Form (certifying income, family size, and racial ethnicity) as required by HUD. Updated forms are to be provided to CITY by HWS should HUD implement changes 252

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

during the term of this Supplemental Agreement. CITY and subcontractors will collect and provide all necessary data required by HUD pertaining to the Specific Outcome Indicators as identified in HUD’s Community Planning and Development (CPD) Outcome Performance Measurement System.

22. PRIOR AUTHORIZATION. CITY shall obtain COUNTY's written approval from HWS prior to implementing the following “high risk” activities funded with CDBG assistance:

A. Construction of public facilities (project plans and specifications); B. Acquisition of real property;
C. Historic Preservation;
D. Relocation; and
F. Economic Development

23. PRIOR COUNTY APPROVAL (CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES) . CITY shall obtain COUNTY's written approval, through its HWS, of the project plans , specifications, and construction documents prior to CITY’S construction of same for all projects consisting of CDBG-funded construction activities. The COUNTY neither undertakes nor assumes nor will have any responsibility or duty to CITY or to any third party to review, inspect, supervise, pass judgment upon or inform CITY or any third party of any matter in connection with the development or construction of the improvements, whether regarding the quality, adequacy or suitability of the plans, any labor, service, equipment or material furnished to the property, an y person furnishing the same, or otherwise. CITY and all third parties shall rely upon its or their own judgment regarding such matters, and any review, inspection, supervision, exercise of judgment or information supplied to CITY or to any third party by the COUNTY in connection with such matter is for the public purpose of assisting with a community development and housing activity pursuant to the Act, and neither CITY (except for the purposes set forth in this Agreement) nor any third party is entitled t o rely thereon. The COUNTY shall not be responsible for any of the work of construction, improvement, or development of the property.

It is the responsibility of CITY, without cost to COUNTY, to ensure that all applicable local jurisdiction land use requir ements will permit development of the property and construction of the improvements and the use, operation, and maintenance of such Improvements in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to entitle Spons or to any 253

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

local jurisdiction or County permit or other local jurisdiction or County approval necessary for the development of the Property, or waive any applicable local jurisdiction or County requirements relating thereto. This Agreement does not (a) gran t any land use entitlement to CITY, (b) supersede, nullify, or amend any condition which may be imposed by the local jurisdiction in connection with approval of the development described herein, (c) guarantee to CITY or any other party any profits from the development of the Property, or (d) amend any local jurisdiction or County laws, codes or rules.

24. PRIOR COUNTY APPROVAL ( AQUISITION ACTIVITIES). CITY shall obtain COUNTY's written approval and authorization to pr oceed, through HWS, of all CDBG-funded real property acquisition activities.

25. REAL PROPERTY ACQUIRED OR PUBLIC FACILITY CONSTRUCTED WITH CDBG FUNDS. When CDBG funds are used, in whole or in part, by CITY to acquire real property or to construct a public facility, CITY will comply with the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (2 CFR Section 200.311); National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C.A. §4321, et seq.); the California Environmental Quality Act (Cal. Pub. Resources Code §21000, et seq.); the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, as amended (42 U.S.C.A. §4630, et seq.); and the COUNTY’s Five Year Consolidated Plan. In addition, the following is to occur:
a. Title to the real property shall vest in CITY;
b. The real property will be held by CITY , or the constructed facility will be maintained by the CITY , for a minimum period of five (5) years from the date the CDBG -funded activity is closed-out and reported as complete by the COUNTY through the Comprehensive Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER);
c. While held by CITY, the real property or the constructed facility is to be used exclusively for the purposes for which acq uisition or construction was originally approved by COUNTY;
d. Written approval from COUNTY must be secured if the property or the facility is 254

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

to be put to an alternate use that is consistent with the COUNTY’S Five Year Consolidated Plan or the applicable federal regulations governing CDBG funds;
e. Should CITY desire to use the real property or the constructed facility , prior to the completion of the mandatory five-year period, for a purpose not consistent with applicable federal regulations governing CDBG funds or to sell the real property or facility, then:
(1) If CITY desires to retain title, CITY will reimburse COUNTY the amount that represents the percentage of current fair market value that is identical to the percentage that CDBG funds initially comprised of monies paid to acquire the property or construct the facility; or (2) If CITY sells the property or facility or is required to sell the property or facility, CITY shall reimburse COUNTY the amount that represents the percentage of proceeds realized by the sale that is identical to the percentage that CDBG funds initially comprised of monies paid to acquire the property or construct the facility. This percent age amount will be calculated after deducting all actual and reasonable cost of sale from the sale proceeds.

26. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Supplemental Agreement, including any attachments or exhibits hereto constitutes the entire Supplemental Agreement of th e parties with respect to its subject matter and supersedes all prior and contemporaneous representations, proposals, discussions and communications, whether oral or in writing. No oral understanding or agreement not incorporated herein shall be binding on any of the parties hereto. Each of the attachments and exhibits attached hereto is incorporated herein by this reference.

27. SEVERABILITY. Each section, paragraph and provision of this Supplemental Agreement is severable from each other provision, and if any provision or part thereof is declared invalid, the remaining provisions shall remain in full force and effect.

28. EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES TO BE CAUSED BY PROJECT. CITY agrees to notify in writing, and to cause any subcontractor implementing CDBG -funded Projects to notify , in writing, the Riverside County Workforce Development Center of any and all job openings that are caused by the CDBG-funded Projects under this Supplemental Agreement.

29. MINISTERIAL ACTS. The Director of Housing and Workforce Solutions or designee(s) are authorized to take such ministerial actions as may be necessary or appropriate to implement the terms, 255

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

provisions, and conditions of this Supplemental Agreement as it may be amended from time-to-time by COUNTY.

30. PROJECT ELIGIBILITY. As to CITY or its claimants, COUNTY shall bear no liability for any later determination by the United States Government, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, or any other person or entity that CITY is or is not eligible under 24 CFR Part 570 to receive CDBG entitlement funds from the COUNTY.

31. SOURCE OF FUNDING. CITY acknowledges that the source of funding pursuant to this Supplemental Agreement is Community Development Block Grant funds (CFDA 14.218), and the Grant Award Number is B-22-UC-06-0506.

32. ASSIGNMENT. The CITY shall not make any assignment or transfer in any form with respect to this Supplemental Agreement, without prior written approval of the COUNTY.

33. INTERPRETATION AND GOVERNING LAW. This Supplemental Agreement and any dispute arising hereunder shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California. This Supplemental Agreement shall be construed as a whole according to its fair language and common meaning to achieve the objectives and purposes of the parties hereto, and the rule of construction to the effect that ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting party shall not be employed in interpreting this Supplemental Agreement , all parties having been represented by counsel in the negotiation and preparation hereof.

34. WAIVER. Failure by a party to insist upon the strict performance of any of the provisions of this Supplemental Agreement by the other party, or the failure by a party to exercise its rights upon the default of the other party, shall not constitute a waiver of such party’s rights to insist and demand strict compliance by the other party with the terms of this Supplemental Agreement thereafter.

35. JURISDICTION AND VENUE: Any action at law or in equity arising under this Supplemental Agreement or brought by a party hereto for the purpose of enforcing, construing or determining the validity of any provision of this Supplemental Agreement shall be filed only in the Superior Court of the State of California, located in Riverside, California, and the parties hereto waive all provisions of law providing for the filing, removal or change of venue to any other court or jurisdiction

36. USE OF PROPERTY. Whenever federal CDBG funds or program income are used, in whole or in part, for the purchase of equipment or personal property, the property shall not be transferred 256

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

from its originally funded use, by CITY or the CITY’S subcontractor implementing the CDBG -funded activity, for a period of five (5) years from the close-out date of the grant from which CDBG assistance was provided. The CITY shall maintain a current inventory for COUNTY monitoring and review.

37. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE. The persons executing this Supplemental Agreement or exhibits attached hereto on behalf of the parties to this Supplemental Agreement hereby warrant and represent that they have the authority to execute this Supplemental Agreement and warrant and represent that they have the authority to bind the respective parties to this Supplemental Agreement to the performance of its obligations hereunder.

38. EFFECTIVE DATE. The effective date of this Supplemental Agreement is the date the parties sign the Supplemental Agreement. If the parties sign the Supplemental Agreement on more than one date, then the last date the Supplemental Agreement is signed by a party shall be the effective date.

39. COUNTERPARTS. This Supplemental Agreement may be signed by the different parties hereto in counterparts, each of which shall be an original but all of which together shall constitute one and the same agreement.

40. FORCE MAJEURE.

A. Performance by either party hereunder shall not be deemed to be in default where delays or defaults are due to war, insurrection, strikes, lock -outs, riots, floods, earthquakes, fires, casualties, acts of God, acts of the public enemy, epidemics, pandemic, quarantine restrictions, freight embargoes, lack of transportation, governmental restrictions or priority, litigation, unusually severe weather, inability to secure necessary labor, material or tools, delays of any contractor, sub -contractor or supplier, acts of the other party, acts or failure to act of a public or governmental agency or entity, or any causes beyond the control or without the fault of the party claiming an extension of time to perform.

B. An extension of time for any such cause (a “Forc e Majeure Delay”) shall be for the period of the enforced delay and shall commence to run from the time of the commencement of the cause, if notice by the party claiming such extension is sent to the other party within thirty (30) calendar days of knowledg e of the commencement of the cause. Notwithstanding the foregoing, none of the foregoing events shall constitute a Force Majeure Delay unless and until the party claiming such delay and interference delivers to the other party written notice describing the event, its cause, when and how such party obtained knowledge, the date the event commenced, and the estimated delay resulting 257

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

therefrom. Any party claiming a Force Majeure Delay shall deliver such written notice within thirty (30) calendar days after it obtains knowledge of the event.

41. MODIFICATION OF AGREEMENT. This Supplemental Agreement may be modified or amended only by a writing signed by the duly authorized and empowered representative of COUNTY and CITY respectively.

42. DIGITAL AND ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES. The parties agrees to the use of electronic signatures, such as digital signatures that meet the requirements of the California Uniform Electronic Transactions Act ((“CUETA”) Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1633.1 to 1633.17). The parties further agree that the electronic signatures of the parties included in this Agreement are intended to authenticate this writing and to have the same force and effect as manual signatures. Electronic signature means an electronic sound, symbol, or process attached to or logically associated with an electronic record and executed or adopted by a person with the intent to sign the electronic record pursuant to CUETA as amended from time to time. Digital signature means an electronic identifier, created by computer, intended by the party using it to have the same force and effect as the use of a manual signature, and shall be reasonably relied upon by the parties. For purposes of this section, a digital signature is a type of "electronic signature" as defined in subdivision (i) of Section 1633.2 of the Civil Code.

[Remainder of Page Intentionally Blank]
[Signatures on Following Page]

258

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the COUNTY and the CITY have executed this Agreement as of the dates set forth below.

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CITY OF EASTVALE,
a political subdivision of the a General law City
State of California

BY: ____________________________ BY: _________________________ Michael Walsh, Name:

Deputy Director
Title:

Date: Date:

APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:

COUNTY COUNSEL

By: ____________________________ BY: _________________________ Amrit P. Dhillon, City Clerk
Deputy County Counsel

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

BY: __________________________
City Attorney

259

EXHIBIT "R"

24 C.F.R. § 5.109

Equal participation of faith-based organizations in
HUD programs and activities.

Effective: May 4, 2016

(a) Purpose.

Consistent with Executive Order 13279 (issued on December 12, 2002, 67 FR 77141), entitled “Equal Protection of the Laws for Faith–Based and Community Organizations,” as amended by Executive Order 13559 (issued on November 17, 2010, 75 FR 71319), entitled “Fundamental Principles and Policymaking Criteria for Partnerships With Faith–Based and Other Neighborhood Organizations,”, and further amended by Executive Order 13831 (issued on May 3, 2018, 83 FR 20715) entitled “Establishment of a White House Faith and Opportunity Initiative,” this section describes requirements for ensu ring the equal participation of faith -based organizations in HUD programs and activities. These requirements apply to all HUD programs and activities, including all of HUD’s Native American Programs, except as may be otherwise noted in the respective program regulations in title 24 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), or unless inconsistent with certain HUD program authorizing statutes.

b) Definitions. The following definitions apply to this section:

Direct Federal financial assistance means Federa l financial assistance provided when a Federal Government agency or an intermediary, as defined in this section, selects the provider and either purchases services from that provider (i.e., via a contract) or awards funds to that provider to carry out an a ctivity (e.g., via grant, sub -grant, sub-award, or cooperative agreement). The recipients of sub -grants or sub-awards that receive Federal financial assistance through State-administered programs (e.g., flow-through programs) are considered recipients of direct Federal financial assistance. In general, Federal financial assistance shall be treated as direct, unless it meets the definition of indirect Federal financial assistance.

Federal financial assistance means assistance that non–Federal entities receive or administer in the forms of grants, contracts, loans, loan guarantees, property, cooperative agreements, food commodities, direct appropriations, or other assistance, but does not include a tax credit, deduction, or exemption.

Indirect Federal financial assistance means Federal financial assistance provided when the choice of the provider is placed in the hands of the beneficiary, and the cost of that service is paid through a voucher, certificate, or other similar means of Government -funded payment. Federal financial assistance provided to an organization is considered indirect when the Government program through which the beneficiary receives the voucher, certificate, or other similar means of Government -funded payment is neutral toward religion meaning that it is available to providers without regard to the religious or non -religious nature of the institution and there are no program incentives that deliberately skew for or against religious or secular providers; and the organization receives the assistance as a result of a genuine, independent choice of the beneficiary.

Intermediary means an entity, including a nongovernmental organization, acting under a contract, grant, or other agreement with the Federal Government or with a State, tribal or local government that accepts Federal financial assistance and distributes that assistance to other entities that, in turn, carry out activities under HUD programs.

(c) Equal participation of faith-based organizations in HUD programs and activities.

260

Faith-based organizations are eligible, on th e same basis as any other organization, to participate in any HUD program or activity, considering any permissible accommodations, particulary under the Religious Freedome Restoration Act. Neither the Federal Government, nor a State, tribal or local government, nor any other entity that administers any HUD program or activity, shall discriminate against an organization on the basis of the organization’s religious character, affiliation, or lack thereof, or on the basis of the organization’s religious exercise. For purposes of this part, to discriminate against an organization on the basis of the organization’s religious exercise means to disfavor an organization, including by failing to select an organization, disqualifying an organization, or imposing any c ondition or selection criterion that otherwise disfavors or penalizes an organization in the selection process or has such an effect:

(1) Because of conduct that would not be considered grounds to disfavor a secular organization; (2) Because of conduct that must or could be granted an appropriate accommodation in a manner consistent with RFRA (42 U.S.C. 2000bb through 2000bb-4) or the Religion Clauses of the First Amendment to the Constitution; or
(3) Because of the actual or suspected religious motivation of the organization's religious exercise. (4) In addition, decisions about awards of Federal financial assistance must be free from political interference or even the appearance of such interference and must be made on the basis of merit, not based on the organization's religious character, affiliation, or lack thereof, or based on the organization's religious exercise. Notices of funding availability, grant agreements, and cooperative agreements shall include language substantially similar to that in appendix A to this subpart, where faith-based organizations are eligible for such opportunities.

(d) Independence and identity of faith-based organizations.

(1) A faith -based organization that applies for, or participates in, a HUD program or activity supported with Federal financial as sistance retains its autonomy, right of expression, religious character, authority over its governance, and independence, and may continue to carry out its mission, including the definition, development, practice, and expression of its religious beliefs. A faith-based organization that receives Federal financial assistance from HUD does not lose the protections of law.

(2) A faith -based organization that receives direct Federal financial assistance may use space (including a sanctuary, chapel, prayer hall, or other space) in its facilities (including a temple, synagogue, church, mosque, or other place of worship) to carry out activities under a HUD program without concealing, altering, or removing religious art, icons, scriptures, or other religious symbols. In addition, a faith-based organization participating in a HUD program or activity retains its authority over its internal governance, and may retain religious terms in its organization’s name, select its board members and employees on the basis of their acceptance of or adherence to the religious tenets of the organization consistent with paragraph (i) of this section), and include religious references in its organization’s mission statements and other governing documents.

(e) Explicitly religious activities.

If an organization engages in explicitly religious activities (including activities that involve overt religious content such as worship, religious instruction, or proselytization), the explicitly religious activities must be offered separately, in time or location, from the programs or activities supported by direct Federal financial assistance and participation must be voluntary for the beneficiaries of the programs or activities that receive direct Federal financial assistance. The use of indi rect Federal financial assistance is not subject to this restriction. Nothing in this part restricts HUD’s authority under applicable Federal law to fund activities, that can be directly funded by the Government consistent with the Establishment Clause of the U.S. Constitution.

(f) Intermediary responsibilities to ensure equal participation of faith-based organizations in HUD programs.

If an intermediary - acting under a contract, grant, or other agreement with the Federal Government or with a State, tribal or local government that is administering a program supported by Federal financial assistance - is 261

given the authority to select a nongovernmental organization to receive Federal financial assistance under a contract, grant, sub -grant, sub -award, or cooperative agreement, the intermediary must ensure that such organization complies with the requirements of this section. If the intermediary is a nongovernmental organization, it retains all other rights of a nongovernmental organization under the progra m’s statutory and regulatory provisions.

(g) Nondiscrimination requirements.

Any organization that receives Federal financial assistance under a HUD program or activity shall not, in providing services with such assistance or carrying out activities with such assistance, discriminate against a beneficiary or prospective beneficiary on the basis of religion, religious belief, a refusal to hold a religious belief, or a refusal to attend or participate in a religious practice. However, an organization that participates in a program funded by indirect Federal financial assistance need not modify its program or activities to accommodate a beneficiary who chooses to expend the indirect aid on the organization's program and may require attendance at all activities that are fundamental to the program.

(h) No additional assurances from faith-based organizations.

A faith -based organization is not rendered ineligible by its religious nature to access and participate in HUD programs. Absent regulatory or statutory authori ty, no notice of funding availability, grant agreement, cooperative agreement, covenant, memorandum of understanding, policy, or regulation that is used by HUD or a recipient or intermediary in administering Federal financial assistance from HUD shall require otherwise eligible faith-based organizations to provide assurances or notices where they are not required of similarly situated secular organizations. All organizations that participate in HUD programs or activities, including organizations with religious character or affiliations, must carry out eligible activities in accordance with all program requirements, subject to any required or appropriate accommodation, particularly under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, and other applicable requirements governing the conduct of HUD-funded activities, including those prohibiting the use of direct financial assistance to engage in explicitly religious activities. No notice of funding availability, grant agreement, cooperative agreement, covenant, memorandum of understanding, policy, or regulation that is used by HUD or a recipient or intermediary in administering financial assistance from HUD shall disqualify otherwise eligible faith -based organizations from participating in HUD's programs or activities because such organization is motivated or influenced by religious faith to provide such programs and activities, or because of its religious character or affiliation, or on grounds that discriminate against an organization on the basis of the organization's religious exercise, as defined in this part.

(i) Exemption from Title VII employment discrimination requirements.

A religious organization’s exemption from the Federal prohibition on employment discrimination on the basis of religion, set forth in section 702(a) of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000e–1), is not forfeited when the organization participates in a HU D program. Some HUD programs, however, contain independent statutory provisions that impose certain nondiscrimination requirements on all grantees. Accordingly, grantees should consult with the appropriate HUD program office to determine the scope of applicable requirements.

(j) Acquisition, construction, and rehabilitation of structures.

Direct Federal financial assistance may be used for the acquisition, construction, or rehabilitation of structures only to the extent that those structures are used for conducting eligible activities under a HUD program or activity.

Where a structure is used for both eligible and explicitly religious activities (including activities that involve overt religious content such as worship, religious instruction, or proselytization), direct Federal financial assistance may not exceed the cost of the share of acquisition, construction, or rehabilitation attributable to eligible activities in accordance with the cost accounting requirements applicable to the HUD program or activi ty. However, 262

acquisition, construction, or rehabilitation of sanctuaries, chapels, or other rooms that a HUD–funded faith-based organization uses as its principal place of worship, may not be paid with direct Federal financial assistance.

Disposition of real property by a faith-based organization after its use for an authorized purpose, or any change in use of the property from an authorized purpose, is subject to Government-wide regulations governing real property disposition (2 CFR part 200, subpart D) and the HUD program regulations, as directed by HUD.

(k) Commingling of Federal and State, tribal, and local funds.

If a State, tribal, or local government voluntarily contributes its own funds to supplement direct Federal financial assistance for an acti vity, the State, tribal or local government has the option to segregate those funds or commingle them with the direct Federal financial assistance. However, if the funds are commingled, the requirements of this section apply to all of the commingled funds. Further, if a State, tribal, or local government is required to contribute matching funds to supplement direct Federal financial assistance for an activity, the matching funds are considered commingled with the direct Federal financial assistance and, therefore, subject to the requirements of this section. Some HUD programs’ requirements govern any activity assisted under those programs. Accordingly, recipients should consult with the appropriate HUD program office to determine the scope of applicable requirements.

(l) Tax exempt organizations.

In general, HUD does not require that a recipient, including a faith -based organization, obtain tax-exempt status under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code to be eligible for funding under HUD programs. Many grant programs, however, do require an organization to be a nonprofit organization in order to be eligible for funding.

Notices of funding availability that require organizations to have nonprofit status will specifically so indicate in the eligibility section of the notice of funding availability. In addition, if any notice of funding availability requires an organization to maintain tax -exempt status, it will expressly state the statutory authority for requiring such status. Applicants should consult with the appropriate HUD program office to determine the scope of any applicable requirements. In HUD programs in which an applicant must show that it is a nonprofit organization but this is not statutorily defined, the applicant may do so by any of the following means:

(1) Proof that the Internal Revenue Service currently recognizes the applicant as an organization to which contributions are tax deductible under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code; (2) A statement from a State or other governmental taxing body or the State secretary of State certifying that - (i) The organization is a nonprofit organization operating within the State; and (ii) No part of its net earnings may benefit any private shareholder or individual;

(3) A certified copy of the applicant's certificate of incorporation or similar document that clearly establishes the nonprofit status of the applicant;
(4) Any item described in paragraphs (l)(1) through (3) of this section, if that item applies to a State of national parents organization, together with a statement by the State of parent organization that the a pplicant is a local nonprofit affiliate; or
(5) For an entity that holds a sincerely held religious belief that it cannot apply for a determination as an entity that is tax-exempt under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, evidence sufficient to establish that the entity would otherwise qualify as a nonprofit organization under paragraphs (l)(1) through (4) of this section.

(m) Rule of construction.

Neither HUD nor any recipient or other intermediary receiving funds under any HUD program or activity shall construe these provisions in such a way as to advantage or disadvantage faith-based organizations affiliated with historic or well-established religions or sects in comparison with other religions or sects.

Credits
263

[69 FR 41717, July 9, 2004; 80 FR 75934, Dec. 7, 2015; 81 FR 19416, April 4, 2016; 85 FR 82315, Dec 17, 2020]

SOURCE: 61 FR 5202, Feb. 9, 1996; 61 FR 9041, March 6, 1996; 61 FR 9537, March 8, 1996; 61 FR 11113, March 18, 1996; 61 FR 13616, March 27, 1996; 61 FR 54498, Oct. 18, 1996; 70 FR 77743, Dec. 30, 2005; 73 FR 72340, Nov. 28, 2008; 75 FR 66258, Oct. 27, 2010; 77 FR 5674, Feb. 3, 2012; 80 FR 42352, July 16, 2015; 81 FR 19416, April 4, 2016; 81 FR 80798, Nov. 16, 2016; 81 FR 90657, Dec. 14, 2016, unless otherwise noted.

AUTHORITY: 12 U.S.C. 1701x; 42 U.S.C. 1437a, 1437c, 1437d, 1437f, 1437n, 3535(d); Sec. 327, Pub.L. 109– 115, 119 Stat. 2936 ; Sec. 607, Pub.L. 109–162, 119 Stat. 3051 (42 U.S.C. 14043e et seq. ); E.O. 13279, 67 FR 77141, 3 CFR, 2002 Comp., p. 258; and E.O. 13559, 75 FR 71319, 3 CFR, 2010 Comp., p. 273.; 29 U.S.C. 794, 42 U.S.C. 1437a , 1437c, 1437c–1(d), 1437d, 1437f, 1437n, 3535(d), and Sec. 327, Pub.L. 109–115, 119 Stat. 2936; 42 U.S.C. 3600–3620; 42 U.S.C. 5304(b); 42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq.; 42 U.S.C. 12704–12708; E.O. 11063, 27 FR 11527, 3 CFR, 1958–1963 Comp., p. 652; E.O. 12892, 59 FR 2939, 3 CFR, 1994 Comp., p. 849.

264

EXHIBIT “S”

Economic Opportunities for Low- and Very Low-Income Persons

CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS
24 CFR Part 75

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

Section 75.1 Purpose

This part establishes the requirements to be followed to ensure the objectives of Section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968 (12 U.S.C. 1701u) (Section 3) are met. The purpose of Section 3 is to ensure that economic opportunities, most importantly employment, generated by certain HUD financial assistance shall be directed to low - and very low -income persons, particularly those who are recipients of government assistance for housing or residents of the community in which the Federal assistance is spent.

Section 75.3 Applicability

(a) General applicability. Section 3 applies to public housing financial assistance and Section 3 projects, as follows:

(1) Public housing financial assistance. Public housing financial assistance means:

(i) Development assistance provided pursuant to section 5 of the United States Housing Act of 1937 (the 1937 Act);

(ii) Operations and management assistance provided pursuant to section 9(e) of the 1937 Act;

(iii) Development, modernization, and management assistance provided pursuant to section 9(d) of the 1937 Act; and

(iv) The entirety of a mixed -finance development project as described in 24 CFR 905.604, regardless of whether the project is fully or partially assisted with public housing financial assistance as defined in paragraphs (a)(1)(i) through (iii) of this section.

(2) Section 3 projects. (i) Section 3 projects means housing rehabilitation, housing construction, and other public construction projects assisted under HUD programs that provide housing and commu nity development financial assistance when the total amount of assistance to the project exceeds a threshold of $200,000. The threshold is $100,000 where the assistance is from the Lead Hazard Control and Healthy Homes programs, as authorized by Sections 501 or 502 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1970 (12 U.S.C. 1701z-1 or 1701z-2), the Lead-Based Paint Poisoning Prevention Act (42 U.S.C 4801 et seq.); and the Residential Lead -Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992 (42 U.S.C. 4851 et seq.). The project is the site or sites together with any building(s) and improvements located on the site(s) that are under common ownership, management, and financing.

265

(ii) The Secretary must update the thresholds provided in paragraph (a)(2)(i) of this section not less than once every 5 years based on a national construction cost inflation factor through Federal Register notice not subject to public comment. When the Secretary finds it is warranted to ensure compliance with Section 3, the Secretary may adjust, regardless of the national construction cost factor, such thresholds through Federal Register notice, subject to public comment.

(iii) The requirements in this part apply to an entire Section 3 project, regardless of whether the project is fully or partial ly assisted under HUD programs that provide housing and community development financial assistance.

(b) Contracts for materials. Section 3 requirements do not apply to material supply contracts.

(c) Indian and Tribal preferences. Contracts, subcontracts, grants, or subgrants subject to Section 7(b) of the Indian Self -Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 5307(b)) or subject to tribal preference requirements as authorized under 101(k) of the Native American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act (25 U.S.C. 4111(k)) must provide preferences in employment, training, and business opportunities to Indians and Indian organizations, and are therefore not subject to the requirements of this part.

(d) Other HUD assistance and other Federal assistance. Recipients that are not subject to Section 3 are encouraged to consider ways to support the purpose of Section 3.

Section 75. 5 Definitions.

The terms HUD, Public housing, and Public Housing Agency (PHA) are defined in 24 CFR part

5. The following definitions also apply to this part:

1937 Act means the United States Housing Act of 1937, 42 U.S.C. 1437 et seq.

Contractor means any entity entering into a contract with:

(1) A recipient to perform work in connection with the expendi ture of public housing financial assistance or for work in connection with a Section 3 project; or

(2) A subrecipient for work in connection with a Section 3 project.

Labor hours means the number of paid hours worked by persons on a Section 3 project or by persons employed with funds that include public housing financial assistance.

Low-income person means a person as defined in Section 3(b)(2) of the 1937 Act.

Material supply contracts means contracts for the purchase of products and materials, including, but not limited to, lumber, drywall, wiring, concrete, pipes, toilets, sinks, carpets, and office supplies.

Professional services means non -construction services that require an advanced degree or professional licensing, including, but not limited to, contracts for legal services, financial 266

consulting, accounting services, environmental assessment, architectural services, and civil engineering services.

Public housing financial assistance means assistance as defined in §75.3(a)(1).

Public housing project is defined in 24 CFR 905.108.

Recipient means any entity that receives directly from HUD public housing financial assistance or housing and community development assistance that funds Se ction 3 projects, including, but not limited to, any State, local government, instrumentality, PHA, or other public agency, public or private nonprofit organization.

Section 3 means Section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968, as amended (12 U.S.C. 1701u).

Section 3 business concern means:

(1) A business concern meeting at least one of the following criteria, documented within the last six-month period:

(i) It is at least 51 percent owned and controlled by low- or very low-income persons;

(ii) Over 75 percent of the labor hours performed for the business over the prior three - month period are performed by Section 3 workers; or

(iii) It is a business at l east 51 percent owned and controlled by current public housing residents or residents who currently live in Section 8-assisted housing.

(2) The status of a Section 3 business concern shall not be negatively affected by a prior arrest or conviction of its owner(s) or employees.

(3) Nothing in this part shall be construed to require the contracting or subcontracting of a Section 3 business concern. Section 3 business concerns are not exempt from meeting the specifications of the contract.

Section 3 project means a project defined in §75.3(a)(2).

Section 3 worker means:

(1) Any worker who currently fits or when hired within the past five years fit at least one of the following categories, as documented:

(i) The worker's income for the previous or annualized calendar year is below the income limit established by HUD.

(ii) The worker is employed by a Section 3 business concern.

(iii) The worker is a YouthBuild participant.
267

(2) The status of a Section 3 worker shall not be negatively affected by a prior arrest or conviction.

(3) Nothing in this part shall be construed to require the employment of someone who meets this definition of a Section 3 worker. Section 3 workers are not exempt from meeting the qualifications of the position to be filled.

Section 8-assisted housing refers to housing receiving project-based rental assistance or tenant- based assistance under Section 8 of the 1937 Act.

Service area or the neighborhood of the project means an area within one mile of the Section 3 project or, if fewer than 5,000 people live within one mile of a Section 3 project, within a circle centered on the Section 3 project that is sufficient to encompass a population of 5,000 people according to the most recent U.S. Census.

Small PHA means a public housing authority that manages or operates fewer than 250 public housing units.

Subcontractor means any entity that has a contract with a contractor to undertake a portion of the contractor's obligation to perform work in connection with the expenditure of public housing financial assistance or for a Section 3 project.

Subrecipient has the meaning provided in the applicable program regulations or in 2 CFR 200.93.

Targeted Section 3 worker has the meanings provided in §§75.11, 75.21, or 75.29, and does not exclude an individual that has a prior arrest or conviction.

Very low-income person means the definition for this term set forth in section 3(b)(2) of the 1937 Act.

YouthBuild programs refers to YouthBuild programs receiving assistance under the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (29 U.S.C. 3226).

Subpart C—Additional Provisions for Housing and Community Development Financial Assistance
§75.19 Requirements.
(a) Employment and training. (1) To the greatest extent feasible, and consistent with existing Federal, state, and local laws and regulations, recipients covered by this subpart shall ensure that employment and training opportunities arising in connection with Section 3 projects are provided to Section 3 workers within the metropolitan area (or nonmetropolitan county) in which the project is located.
(2) Where feasible, priority for opportunities and training described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section should be given to:
268

(i) Section 3 workers residing within the service area or the neighborhood of the project, and (ii) Participants in YouthBuild programs.
(b) Contracting. (1) To the greatest extent feasible, and consistent with existing Federal, state, and local laws and regulations, recipients covered by this subpart shall ensure contracts for work awarded in connection with Section 3 projects are provided to business concerns that provide economic opportunities to Section 3 workers residing within the metropolitan area (or nonmetropolitan county) in which the project is located.
(2) Where feasible, priority for contracting opportunities described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section should be given to:
(i) Section 3 business concerns that provide economic opportunities to Section 3 workers residing within the service area or the neighborhood of the project, and (ii) YouthBuild programs.
§75.21 Targeted Section 3 worker for housing and community development financial assistance. (a) Targeted Section 3 worker. A Targeted Section 3 worker for housing and community development financial assistance means a Section 3 worker who is:
(1) A worker employed by a Section 3 business concern; or (2) A worker who currently fits or when hired fit at least one of the following categories, as documented within the past five years:
(i) Living within the service area or the neighborhood of the project, as defined in §75.5; or (ii) A YouthBuild participant.
(b) [Reserved]
§75.23 Section 3 safe harbor.
(a) General. Recipients will be considered to have complied with requirements in this part, in the absence of evidence to the contrary if they:
(1) Certify that they have followed the prioritization of effort in §75.19; and (2) Meet or exceed the applicable Section 3 benchmark as described in paragraph (b) of this section.
(b) Establishing benchmarks. (1) HUD will establish Section 3 benchmarks for Section 3 workers or Targeted Section 3 workers or both through a document published in the FEDERAL REGISTER. HUD may establish a single nationwide benchmark for Section 3 workers and a single nationwide 269

benchmark for Targeted Section 3 workers, or may establish multiple benchmarks based on geography, the nature of the Section 3 project, or other variables. HUD will update the benchmarks through a document published in the FEDERAL REGISTER, subject to public comment, not less frequently than once every 3 years. Such notice shall include aggregate data on labor hours and the proportion of recipients meeting benchmarks, as well as other metrics reported pursuant to §75.25 as deemed appropriate by HUD, for the 3 most recent reporting years. (2) In establishing the Section 3 benchmarks, HUD may consider the industry averages for labor hours worked by specific categories of workers or in different localities or regions; averages for labor hours worked by Section 3 workers and Targeted Section 3 workers as reported by recipients pursuant to this section; and any other factors HUD deems important. In establishing the Section 3 benchmarks, HUD will exclude professional services from the total number of labor hours as such hours are excluded from the total number of labor hours to be reported per §75.25(a)(4). (3) Section 3 benchmarks will consist of the following two ratios:
(i) The number of labor hours worked by Section 3 workers divided by the total number of labor hours worked by all workers on a Section 3 project in the recipient's program year. (ii) The number of labor hours worked by Targeted Section 3 workers as defined in §75.21(a), divided by the total number of labor hours worked by all workers on a Section 3 project in the recipient's program year.
§75.25 Reporting.
(a) Reporting of labor hours. (1) For Section 3 projects, recipients must report in a manner prescribed by HUD:
(i) The total number of labor hours worked;
(ii) The total number of labor hours worked by Section 3 workers; and (iii) The total number of labor hours worked by Targeted Section 3 workers. (2) Section 3 workers' and Targeted Section 3 workers' labor hours may be counted for five years from when their status as a Section 3 worker or Targeted Section 3 worker is established pursuant to §75.31.
(3) The labor hours reported under paragraph (a)(1) of this section must include the total number of labor hours worked on a Section 3 project, including labor hours worked by any subrecipients, contractors and subcontractors that the recipient is required, or elects pursuant to paragraph (a)(4) of this section, to report.
(4) Recipients reporting under this section, as well as subrecipients, contractors and subcontractors who report to recipients, may report labor hours by Section 3 workers, under paragraph (a)(1)(ii) of this section, and labor hours by Targeted Section 3 workers, under paragraph (a)(1)(iii) of this section, from professional services without including labor hours from professional services in the 270

total number of labor hours worked under paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this section. If a contract covers both professional services and other work and the recipient or contractor or subcontractor chooses not to report labor hours from professional services, the labor hours under the contract that are not from professional services must still be reported.
(5) Recipients may report their own labor hours or that of a subrecipient, contractor, or subcontractor based on the employer's good faith assessment of the labor hours of a full-time or part- time employee informed by the employer's existing salary or time and attendance based payroll systems, unless the project or activity is otherwise subject to requirements specifying time and attendance reporting.
(b) Additional reporting if Section 3 benchmarks are not met. If the recipient's reporting under paragraph (a) of this section indicates that the recipient has not met the Section 3 benchmarks described in §75.23, the recipient must report in a form prescribed by HUD on the qualitative nature of its activities and those its contractors and subcontractors pursued. Such qualitative efforts may, for example, include but are not limited to the following:
(1) Engaged in outreach efforts to generate job applicants who are Targeted Section 3 workers. (2) Provided training or apprenticeship opportunities.
(3) Provided technical assistance to help Section 3 workers compete for jobs (e.g., resume assistance, coaching).
(4) Provided or connected Section 3 workers with assistance in seeking employment including:
drafting resumes, preparing for interviews, and finding job opportunities connecting residents to job placement services.
(5) Held one or more job fairs.
(6) Provided or referred Section 3 workers to services supporting work readiness and retention (e.g., work readiness activities, interview clothing, test fees, transportation, child care). (7) Provided assistance to apply for/or attend community college, a four-year educational institution, or vocational/technical training.
(8) Assisted Section 3 workers to obtain financial literacy training and/or coaching. (9) Engaged in outreach efforts to identify and secure bids from Section 3 business concerns. (10) Provided technical assistance to help Section 3 business concerns understand and bid on contracts.
(11) Divided contracts into smaller jobs to facilitate participation by Section 3 business concerns. (12) Provided bonding assistance, guaranties, or other efforts to support viable bids from Section 3 business concerns.
271

(13) Promoted use of business registries designed to create opportunities for disadvantaged and small businesses.
(14) Outreach, engagement, or referrals with the state one-stop system as defined in Section 121(e)(2) of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act. (c) Reporting frequency. Unless otherwise provided, recipients must report annually to HUD under paragraph (a) of this section, and, where required, under paragraph (b) of this section, on all projects completed within the reporting year in a manner consistent with reporting requirements for the applicable HUD program.
§75.27 Contract provisions.
(a) Recipients must include language applying Section 3 requirements in any subrecipient agreement or contract for a Section 3 project.
(b) Recipients of Section 3 funding must require subrecipients, contractors, and subcontractors to meet the requirements of §75.19, regardless of whether Section 3 language is included in recipient or subrecipient agreements, program regulatory agreements, or contracts.

Subpart D—Provisions for Multiple Funding Sources, Recordkeeping, and Compliance
§75.29 Multiple funding sources.
(a) If a housing rehabilitation, housing construction or other public construction project is subject to Section 3 pursuant to §75.3(a)(1) and (2), the recipient must follow subpart B of this part for the public housing financial assistance and may follow either subpart B or C of this part for the housing and community development financial assistance. For such a project, the following applies:
(1) For housing and community development financial assistance, a Targeted Section 3 worker is any worker who meets the definition of a Targeted Section 3 worker in either subpart B or C of this part; and
(2) The recipients of both sources of funding shall report on the housing rehabilitation, housing construction, or other public construction project as a whole and shall identify the multiple associated recipients. PHAs and other recipients must report the following information:
(i) The total number of labor hours worked on the project; (ii) The total number of labor hours worked by Section 3 workers on the project; and (iii) The total number of labor hours worked by Targeted Section 3 workers on the project. (b) If a housing rehabilitation, housing construction, or other public construction project is subject to Section 3 because the project is assisted with funding from multiple sources of housing and community development assistance that exceed the thresholds in §75.3(a)(2), the recipient or recipients 272

must follow subpart C of this part, and must report to the applicable HUD program office, as prescribed by HUD.
§75.31 Recordkeeping.
(a) HUD shall have access to all records, reports, and other documents or items of the recipient that are maintained to demonstrate compliance with the requirements of this part, or that are maintained in accordance with the regulations governing the specific HUD program by which the Section 3 project is governed, or the public housing financial assistance is provided or otherwise made available to the recipient, subrecipient, contractor, or subcontractor. (b) Recipients must maintain documentation, or ensure that a subrecipient, contractor, or subcontractor that employs the worker maintains documentation, to ensure that workers meet the definition of a Section 3 worker or Targeted Section 3 worker, at the time of hire or the first reporting period, as follows:
(1) For a worker to qualify as a Section 3 worker, one of the following must be maintained:
(i) A worker's self-certification that their income is below the income limit from the prior calendar year;
(ii) A worker's self-certification of participation in a means-tested program such as public housing or Section 8-assisted housing;
(iii) Certification from a PHA, or the owner or property manager of project-based Section 8- assisted housing, or the administrator of tenant-based Section 8-assisted housing that the worker is a participant in one of their programs;
(iv) An employer's certification that the worker's income from that employer is below the income limit when based on an employer's calculation of what the worker's wage rate would translate to if annualized on a full-time basis; or
(v) An employer's certification that the worker is employed by a Section 3 business concern. (2) For a worker to qualify as a Targeted Section 3 worker, one of the following must be maintained:
(i) For a worker to qualify as a Targeted Section 3 worker under subpart B of this part:
(A) A worker's self-certification of participation in public housing or Section 8-assisted housing programs;
(B) Certification from a PHA, or the owner or property manager of project-based Section 8- assisted housing, or the administrator of tenant-based Section 8-assisted housing that the worker is a participant in one of their programs;
(C) An employer's certification that the worker is employed by a Section 3 business concern; or 273

(D) A worker's certification that the worker is a YouthBuild participant. (ii) For a worker to qualify as a Targeted Section 3 worker under subpart C of this part:
(A) An employer's confirmation that a worker's residence is within one mile of the work site or, if fewer than 5,000 people live within one mile of a work site, within a circle centered on the work site that is sufficient to encompass a population of 5,000 people according to the most recent U.S. Census; (B) An employer's certification that the worker is employed by a Section 3 business concern; or (C) A worker's self-certification that the worker is a YouthBuild participant. (c) The documentation described in paragraph (b) of this section must be maintained for the time period required for record retentions in accordance with applicable program regulations or, in the absence of applicable program regulations, in accordance with 2 CFR part 200. (d) A PHA or recipient may report on Section 3 workers and Targeted Section 3 workers for five years from when their certification as a Section 3 worker or Targeted Section 3 worker is established. §75.33 Compliance.
(a) Records of compliance. Each recipient shall maintain adequate records demonstrating compliance with this part, consistent with other recordkeeping requirements in 2 CFR part 200. (b) Complaints. Complaints alleging failure of compliance with this part may be reported to the HUD program office responsible for the public housing financial assistance or the Section 3 project, or to the local HUD field office.
(c) Monitoring. HUD will monitor compliance with the requirements of this part. The applicable HUD program office will determine appropriate methods by which to oversee Section 3 compliance. HUD may impose appropriate remedies and sanctions in accordance with the laws and regulations for the program under which the violation was found

274

EXHIBIT A
File No.: 2.EV.21-22

SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT

SCOPE OF WORK
(NON-PUBLIC SERVICE)

I. GENERAL INFORMATION

CITY NAME: City of Eastvale UEI #: PENDING

ADDRESS: 12363 Limonite Ave Suite 910

Eastvale, CA 91752

PROGRAM CONTACTS: Henry Garcia, Acting City Manager

PHONE: 951-361-0900 FAX: (951) 685-1225

E-MAIL: [email protected]

PROJECT NAME: City of Eastvale Miscellaneous ADA Improvements

PROJECT LOCATION: Various Locations Throughout the City

LEVEL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE: Categorical Exclusion

CDBG ELIGIBILITY CODE: 570.201 (c)

PROJECT FUNDING SUMMARY: $196,130

Project to be administered by County (HWS) on behalf of City: YES NO

II. SCOPE OF SERVICE

A. Activities

City will be responsible for administering a 2022-2023 Community Development Block Grant for the City of Eastvale Miscellaneous ADA Improvements in a manner satisfactory to the County of Riverside and consistent with any standards required as a condition of providing these funds. Such program will include the following activities eligible under the Community Development Block Grant program:

Activity #1 The City of Eastvale will use CDBG funds to pay for costs associated with the construction of ADA improvements at various city-owned public facilities. CDBG funds will be used for design, construction, project management, compliance monitoring, and inspection/testing costs. City of Eastvale Miscellaneous ADA Improvements.

275

EXHIBIT A
File No.: 2.EV.21-22

B. National Objective

All activities funded with CDBG funds must comply with one of more of the CDBG program’s National Objective Criteria as required under 24 CFR 570.200(a)(2). City certifies that the activity(ies) carried out under this Agreement will meet the following National Objective:

National Objective Criteria: 570.208 (a)(1)(i)

CFR Reference: Low Mod Area

C. Levels of Accomplishment – Goals and Performance Measures

The City agrees to implement and complete the following activity(ies):

Activity #1 construct sidewalks, curbs, and street improvements.

Activity #2 project management, compliance, design, and construction costs.

CPD OUTCOME PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT

Objectives (select one): Creating Suitable Living Environments Providing Decent Affordable Housing
Creating Economic Opportunities

Outcome (select one): Availability/Accessibility
Affordability
Sustainability (promoting livable or viable communities)

D. City Capacity

By executing this Supplemental Agreement, the City certifies that it has the appropriate number of trained and knowledgeable staff, adequate facilities, proper equipment, required licensing and permitting, and sufficient amount of financial resources neces sary to implement and carry out the activities funded with CDBG funds.

City will immediately notify County of any significant changes in organizational management, assigned staff, change in facilities, loss or change in matching funds, or any other event that could potentially impact the City or subrecipient’s performance under this Agreement.

Any changes in the above items are subject to the prior approval of the County.

E. Performance Monitoring

The County of Riverside will monitor the performance of the City and its subrecipients against goals and performance standards as stated above. Substandard performance as determined by the

County will constitute noncompliance with this Agreement. If action to correct such subs tandard performance is not taken by the City within a reasonable period of time after being notified by the County, contract suspension or termination procedures will be initiated.

F. Program Budget
276

EXHIBIT A
File No.: 2.EV.21-22

It is expressly agreed and understood that the total amount to be paid by the County under this Agreement shall not exceed $196,130 Drawdowns for the payment of eligible expenses shall be made against the line item budgets specified in this Section and in accordance with performance. Payments may be contingent upon certification of the Subrecipient’s financial management system in accordance with the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (2 CFR Part 200).

The County may require a more detailed budget br eakdown than the one contained herein, and the City shall provide such supplementary budget information in a timely fashion in the form and content prescribed by the County. Any amendments to the budget must be approved in writing by both the County and City.

Line Item CDBG Granted Funds Total of Non-
CDBG Funds
Total Activity/Project
Budget
Notes
Design/Engineering Costs $30,000 $20,000 $$736,130

Project Administration Costs

$1

$15,000

$20,000

Construction Costs

$

$151,130
$500,000

Acquisition Costs

Relocations Costs

Capital Equipment Costs

Code Enforcement

Clearance

Interim Assistance

Indirect Costs:

TOTAL CDBG BUDGET $196,130 $540,000 $736,130

G. Total Amount of Non- CDBG Leveraging
277

EXHIBIT A
File No.: 2.EV.21-22

TYPE SOURCE AMOUNT SOURCE AMOUNT SOURCE AMOUNT TOTAL

FEDERAL
STATE/LOCAL Gas Tax/Measure $540,000

PRIVATE
OTHER
TOTAL: $ 540,000__

III. ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS

A. Accounting Standards

The City agrees to comply with the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (2 CFR Part 200) and agrees to adhere to the accounting principles and procedures required therein, utilize adequate internal controls, and maintain necessary source documentation for all costs incurred.

B. Cost Principles

The City shall administer its program in conformance with the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (2 CFR Part 200).

These principles shall be applied for all costs incurred whether charged on a direct or indirect basis.

C. Documentation and Record Keeping

1. Records to be Maintained

The Subrecipient shall maintain all records required by the Federal regulations specified in 24 CFR 570.506 that are pertinent to the activities to be funded under this Agreement. Such records shall include but not be limited to:

I Records providing a full description of each activity undertaken; ii. Records demonstrating that each activity undertaken meets one of the National Objectives of the CDBG program;
iii. Records required to determine the eligibility of activities; iv. Records required to document the acquisition, improvement, use or disposition of real property acquired or improved with CDBG assistance;
v. Records documenting compliance with the fair housing and equal opportunity components of the CDBG program;
vi. Financial records as required by 24 CFR 570.502, and 2 CFR 200; and vii. Other records necessary to document compliance with Subpart K of 24 CFR Part 570.

2. Records Retention
278

EXHIBIT A
File No.: 2.EV.21-22

The City shall retain all CDBG-related financial records, supporting documents, contracts, and agreements for a period of four (4) years. The retention period begins on the date of the submission of the County’s annual performance and evaluation report to HUD in which the activities assisted under the Agreeme nt are reported for the final time. The City will retain all National Objective documentation, including low-moderate income certification, ethnicity, and other pertinent data for a period of four (4) years after submission of the County’s annual performance and evaluation report to HUD. Notwithstanding the above, if there is litigation, claims, audits, negotiations or other actions that involve any of the records cited and that have started before the expiration of the four -year period, then such records m ust be retained until completion of the actions and resolution of all issues.

3. Client Data

The City shall maintain client data demonstrating client eligibility for services provided. Such data shall include, but not be limited to, client name, addre ss, income level or other basis for determining eligibility, and description of service provided. Such information shall be made available to County monitors or their designees for review upon request.

4. Disclosure

The City understands that client information collected under this contract is private and the use or disclosure of such information, when not directly connected with the administration of the County’s or City’s responsibilities with respect to services provided under this contract, is prohibited by applicable federal and State law unless written consent is obtained from such person receiving service and, in the case of a minor, that of a responsible parent/guardian.

5. Close-outs

The City’s obligatio n to the County shall not end until all close -out requirements are completed.

Activities during this close -out period shall include, but are not limited to: making final payments, disposing of program assets (including the return of all unused materials, equipment, unspent cash advances, program income balances, and accounts receivable to the County), and determining the custodianship of records. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the terms of this Agreement shall remain in effect during any period that the City has control over CDBG funds, including program income.

6. Audits & Inspections

All City records with respect to any matters covered by this Agreement shall be made available to the County, HUD, and the Controller General of the United States or any of their authorized representatives, at any time during normal business hours, as often as deemed necessary, to audit, examine, and make excerpts or transcripts of all relevant data. Any deficiencies noted in audit reports must be fully cleared by the City within 30 days after receipt by the City. Failure of the City to comply with the above audit requirements will constitute a violation of this contract and may result in the withholding of future payments. The City hereby agrees to have an annual agency audit conducted in accordance with current County policy concerning subrecipient audits the Single Audit Act, and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Costs Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). 279

EXHIBIT A
File No.: 2.EV.21-22

IV. PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION AND SCHEDULE

Unless pre-approved by County, City will perform and complete the activities described in Section II in conformance with the schedule of tasks and milestones listed below:

Tasks / Milestone Start Date Completion Date

Complete CDBG Training September 2022 September 2022

Implement Project Activities Upon Notification from HWS

Execute Supplemental Agreement September 2022 October 2022 & Notice to Incur Cost

Tasks / Milestone Start Date Completion Date

Submit Quarterly Performance November 2022
Reports to County January 2023
April 2023
June 2024

County Monitoring of City To be determined by Program Manager Program/Performance

Specific Project Activities To be determined by Program Manager

City Submits Reimbursement Requests

Monthly Submittal

Other Schedule

CDBG-funded Project Complete June 2024

City Submits Monthly Upon Notification by HWS
Direct Benefit Reports

V. SPECIAL CONDITIONS /PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS

City must follow proper procurement and construction policies and procedures of the City and CDBG regulations. No construction will shall commence using CDBG funding without prior Notice to Proceed.

Pre-Construction meeting required. City is required to c ontact the County Program Manager for review prior to submission of RFP, construction activity or cost without prior written approval. County must be contacted 10 days in advance for attendance of Pre-Construction meeting. Original Certified payrolls to be submitted on a weekly basis to County.

280

AGENDA STAFF REPORT

City Council Meeting

CONSENT CALENDAR

Agenda Item No. 11.9
October 26, 2022
Acceptance of Right-of-Way Dedica,on at Hall Avenue for the Cabrera Proper,es located at 7690 Hall Avenue And 7688 Hall Avenue
Prepared By:

Jimmy Chung, City Engineer
Recommended Action(s)
Staff recommends that the City Council Adopt a Resoluon accepng the dedicaon of right-of-way at Hall Avenue (Cabrera Properties) for public roads and utilities.

Summary
The condions of approval of the single-family homes development, Cabrera Properes, requires the applicant to record appropriate easements. The property owner, Javier Cabrera, is dedicang a right-of-way easement on Chandler Street to the City of Eastvale for public streets and ulity purposes (A(achment 3). This will give the City the right to maintain and make further improvements on Hall Ave once the development constructs the ulmate improvements. Frontage improvements include curb, gu(er, sidewalk, and road improvements. The Cabrera Properes are located at 7690 Hall Avenue and 7688 Hall Avenue,
east of Hall Avenue, between Chandler Street
and Walters Street at (Attachment 2).

Background
On October 7, 2020 city staff approved the minor development review for the properes located on 7690 Hall Avenue and 7688 Hall Avenue. The minor development review included the development of a 1,676 square foot single-story residence and a 2,775 square foot two-story residence. Per the condions of approval, the developer was required to dedicate a three-foot easement and provide frontage improvements along Hall Avenue. The improvements include curb, gutter and sidewalk. 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752 951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
281
Environmental
Accepng the right-of-way dedicaon is not subject to the California Environmental Act (CEQA) and no further environmental review is needed.

Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: N/A
| Target #: 5
| Goal #: N/A
Plan for landscape, roads, and street maintenance.

Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact at this me. Long term maintenance of the streets and appurtenances will be the city's obligaon once the ulmate improvements are completed by the developer and the city accepts the project as complete. Special revenue funds will be used for future maintenance of the street and appurtenances.

Prior City Council/Commission Action
Single-family custom homes do not require City Council or Planning Commission review.

Attachment(s)
Attachment 1 - Resolution 22-XX for Cabrera Properties

Attachment 2 - Vicinity Map

Attachment 3 - Dedication Exhibits

12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
282
RESOLUTION NO. 22-XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

EASTVALE, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO
ACCEPT THE EASEMENT FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY PURPOSES ALONG 7690

HALL AVENUE FROM JAVIER CABRERA

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED, that the City Council of the City of Eastvale hereby authorizes the City Manager to accept an easement for right-of- way purposes substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A from Javier Cabrera and within the City of Eastvale; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is authorized to execute any documents and take all action necessary to complete the acceptance and recordation of the easement.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 26th day of October 2022.

Clint Lorimore, Mayor

APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:

Erica Vega, City Attorney Marc Donohue, City Clerk

283

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )
§ CITY OF EASTVALE )

I, Marc Donahue, Acting City Clerk of the City Council of the City of Eastvale, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing City Council Resolution, No. 22-XX, was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Eastvale, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 26 th day of October, 2022, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Marc Donahue, City Clerk

284

EXHIBIT A

GRANT OF EASEMENT
285
Vicinity Map

N
286
OWNER
287
288
289
290

AGENDA STAFF REPORT

City Council Meeting

CONSENT CALENDAR

Agenda Item No. 11.10
October 26, 2022
Approve Task Order A-11 with JPW Communica/ons for Economic Development Marketing
Prepared By:

Alexander Fung, Senior Management Analyst
Recommended Action(s)
Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute Task Order A-11 with JPW Communica$ons in an amount not-to-exceed $26,890.00 for website design and maintenance services related to Downtown Eastvale.

Summary
The City of Eastvale currently maintains a website, known as the “Eastvale Elevates” website, to highlight economic development updates, share useful informa$on with Eastvale’s businesses, and display data and maps that can help a5ract and retain businesses. As the City proceeds with the development of Downtown Eastvale, city staff has taken a more ac$ve approach to recruit new businesses that are interested in expanding their opera$ons in Eastvale. City staff desires to update the “Eastvale Elevates” website with a focus on highligh$ng Downtown Eastvale and its opportuni$es, while con$nuing to u$lize the website as an informa$onal hub for businesses owners.

City staff recommends that the City Council approve a Task Order with JPW Communica$ons to obtain services to further enhance the “Eastvale Elevates” website’s design and contents. JPW Communica$ons had previously completed strategic planning ini$a$ves, website development projects, outreach material design efforts, and video edi$ng ac$vi$es in Task Orders A-1 to A-10.

Attachment 1 includes previous on-call agreements with JPW Communications.

Background
The proposed Scope of Work to provide design and support services for the “Eastvale Elevates” 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752 951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
291
website includes several tasks: Rewri$ng and publishing website contents to focus on providing informa$on that will a5ract businesses to open in Eastvale, providing video updates, ensuring that the website adheres to the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 requirements, crea$ng addi$onal webpages, and providing website transla$on services. Addi$onally, the Scope of Work includes periodic team mee$ngs for the consultants to update city staff and receive direc$ons and input. Attachment 2 includes additional details regarding the proposed Scope of Work.

All of the stated services will be provided in an amount not-to-exceed $26,890.00.

Environmental
The proposed contract is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). As a result, no environmental review efforts are required.

Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: 1
| Target #: 2
| Goal #: 1
The services that are provided under the proposed contract support and contribute to the development of the City’s Downtown Eastvale, which can a5ract businesses and retailers to establish their presence in the City and create a “Des$na$on Eastvale” with high-quality and unique businesses.

Fiscal Impact
There are sufficient funds budgeted in Fiscal Year 2022-2023 for the recommended ac$on as shown below:

Fund
Account
Department
Account
Description
Available Budget
General
100-301-6422
Community
Development
Economic
Development
$191,071.18
Prior City Council/Commission Action
Previously, the City Council approved several task orders with JPW Communica$ons. On August 25, 2021, the City Council approved Task Order A-3 in the amount of $55,550.00 for economic development communica$ons support, Task Order A-4 in the amount of $31,205.00 for Housing Element/Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) community engagement support, and Task Order A-5 in the amount of $12,700.00 for communica$ons support regarding the League of California Ci$es’ proposed resolu$on related to online sales tax revenue disbursement. Addi$onally, the City Council approved Task Orders A-6, A-7, and A-8 in the amount of $59,000.00 for safety and connec$vity project and economic development project public outreach support on January 26, 2022. The City Council also approved Task Order A-10 in the amount of $42,985.00 for economic development marketing and outreach services on September 28, 2022.

Task Orders A-1, A-2, and A-9 did not require City Council approval given that the City’s Purchasing Ordinance allows the City Manager to approve all contracts that are under $24,999.00. Task Order A-1 was approved in the amount of $24,500.00 for the development of an economic development marke$ng campaign. Task Order A-2 was approved in the amount of $10,000.00 for economic development print collateral and website maintenance support. Task Order A-9 was approved in the 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752 951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
292
amount of $5,385.00 for economic development website support.

Attachment(s)
Attachment 1 - Previous On-Call Agreements with JPW Communications

Attachment 2 - Received Proposal
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
293

AGREEMENT FOR ON- CALL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
COMMUNICATIONS AND VIDEOGRAPHY SERVICES]
This Agreement for On- Call Professional Services (" Agreement") is entered into as of this day of 202(| by and between the City of Eastvale, a municipal corporation (" City") and JPW Communications, LLC, a California limited liability company Contractor"). City and Contractor are sometimes hereinafter individually referred to as Party" and hereinafter collectively referred to as the " Parties."

RECITALS
A. City has sought, by request for qualifications the performance of the services defined and described particularly in Section 2 of this Agreement.

B. Contractor, following submission of its qualifications for the performance of the services defined and described particularly in Section 2 of this Agreement, was selected by the City to be eligible to perform those services as needed and requested by the City.

C. The Parties desire to formalize the selection of Contractor for performance of those services defined and described particularly in Section 2 of this Agreement and desire that the terms of that performance be as particularly defined and described herein.

OPERATIVE PROVISIONS
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants made by the Parties and contained here and other consideration, the value and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:

SECTION 1. TERM OF AGREEMENT.

Subject to the provisions of Section 20 " Termination of Agreement" of this Agreement, the Term of this Agreement is for three years commencing on the date first ascribed above. City may extend the Term of this Agreement two times for one year each time, for a total potential term of five years.

SECTION 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES & SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE. a) Scope of Services. Contractor agrees to perform communications and videography services ( hereinafter, the " Services") as requested and authorized by the City. When the City desires to utilize Contractor for Services, the City will issue a Task Order that includes a Scope of Services to be performed and the compensation to be paid for the Services within the Task Order. Each Task Order shall be attached to this Agreement in Exhibit " A" ( e. g., the first Task Order will be Exhibit " A- 1", the second Exhibit A- 2," etc.). Each Task Order is made a part of this Agreement by this reference. b) Schedule of Performance. The Services authorized by each Task Order shall be completed pursuant to the schedule stated in the Task Order. Should the 1 -
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
RJV #4832-5390-9�32 ,2
EXHIBIT "A-1"
TASK ORDER #1 SEE ATTACHED
318
319
320
321
RJV #4832-5390-9�32 ,2
EXHIBIT "A-2"
TASK ORDER #2 SEE ATTACHED
322
323
RJV #4832-5390-9�32 ,2
EXHIBIT "A-3"
TASK ORDER #3 SEE ATTACHED
324
Item Type
Description
Quantity
Unit Price
Amount
Service
Website
- Create website landing pages for LEAL site, Hamner
Place, News page for media coverage, and Events calendar page

1.00 $4,500.00
$4,500.00
Service
Website - Enhancement of the Eastvale Elevates "About Us" web page to include a background on the team. JPW to
conduct individual interviews with Eastvale leadership, and JPW will draft content for placement.

1.00 $1,550.00
$1,550.00
Service
Content - Create a 6-month, bi-weekly blog post (12 total) to support the economic development key messages including graphics and SEO. Content will be recycled in other digital marketing aspects to extend shelf life and expand reach such as eblasts, social posts, etc.

1.00 $7,000.00
$7,000.00
Service
Digital Marketing - Incorporate various digital marketing advertising and outreach campaigns to specifically target audience by using content and strategic execution through email blasts, Google AdWords media buys, social media
boosting, and content-specific ad campaigns to drive more traffic to the Eastvale Elevates website. This will include creative assets, campaign placement, and campaign
monitoring.

1.00 $22,000.00
$22,000.00
Service
New Business Direct Outreach - JPW will conduct the
research, development, set-up and creation of a welcome box as a thank you to new businesses for opening in Eastvale. The box will include:
- A customized Eastvale Elevates box
- Tchotchkes (water bottle, coffee cup, etc.)
- 'How-to guide to host a grand opening,'
- 'Key contacts list' for Eastvale services
This box can also be used for generalized services such as a new employee welcome gift, a special gift for dignitaries visiting Eastvale, etc. *Price for printed collateral is listed in the next line item. Price for this task includes the research, development, set-up of account for Eastvale to order collateral on an as-needed basis.

1.00 $5,000.00
$5,000.00
From JPW Communications 2710 Loker Avenue W
Suite 300
Carlsbad, CA 92010
Estimate For
City of Eastvale
12363 Limonite Avenue
Suite 910
Eastvale, CA
91752
Estimate ID
121
Issue Date
07/26/2021
Subject
City of Eastvale Economic Development
Support Phase II

Service
Printed Collateral - JPW will create an Eastvale Elevates pitchbook/pitch kit to be used as a leave-behind after meetings filled with visual aids when pitching to prospective developers or business owners. The kit will include branded materials that provide an overview and main attributes of Eastvale and will contain details about a specific property or entity Eastvale wants to highlight. Collateral will also include:
- How-to Guide to host a grand opening for the new business welcome box
- Key contacts list for the new business welcome box
- Eastvale shopping malls electronic and printable map
- Economic development general brochure
*Price does not include printing and production

1.00 $8,000.00
$8,000.00
Service
Project Management - As needed project management to
execute outreach initiatives in a timely and cost-effective manner.

1.00 $7,500.00
$7,500.00
Estimate Total
$55,550.00
Notes
Ongoing public outreach to support Eastvale's economic development department's strategic plan. Services will be conducted on an as- needed basis.

RJV #4832-5390-9�32 ,2
EXHIBIT "A -4"
TASK ORDER #4 SEE ATTACHED
327
Item Type
Description
Quantity
Unit Price
Amount
Service
[STRATEGY & MESSAGING]:
- Strategic communications plan to highlight key message points to be used in all forms of media, outreach and
communication. This will serve as a guidebook to maintain consistency and clarity.

1.00 $2,500.00
$2,500.00
Service
[SURVEY]:
- Conduct a community survey to gauge baseline knowledge of community member's understanding of the housing plan via email.
- Receive and analyze survey results; present to client; adjust strategy if needed.
-
NOTE:

Please see notes section below.

1.00 $4,445.00
$4,445.00
Service
[OWNED MEDIA]:
- Create a new web page on the planning website to
understand the housing process.
- Create icons for easy navigation to the housing simulator. - Make this web page home base for all communication-related outreach and direct all inquires to this page.
- Develop email drip campaign schedule, copy, and creative approach for August, September, October and November.
- Create messaging for the water department and garbage departments billing snipes to be sent out in September, October, and potentially November depending on the printing deployment schedule.

1.00 $7,650.00
$7,650.00
Service
[CUSTOMER CARE]:
- Develop reactive response messages for Eastvale planning staff to be used to address public inquiries and concerns. - These will be turned into FAQs that will be updated as new inquiries come in to educate and dispel false stories produced outside of Eastvale purview.

1.00 $1,150.00
$1,150.00
From JPW Communications 2710 Loker Avenue W
Suite 300
Carlsbad, CA 92010
Estimate For
City of Eastvale
12363 Limonite Avenue
Suite 910
Eastvale, CA
91752
Estimate ID
142
Issue Date
08/09/2021
Subject
City of Eastvale RHNA Community Engagement

Service
[COMMUNITY OUTREACH]:
- Coordinate all logistics for five (5) virtual public meetings (one in each council member's district) specific to this topic (no other topics will be addressed).
- JPW will moderate the meetings, create the presentation slide deck, create, print, and distribute all outreach collateral to promote meeting participation.
- The content created for these meetings can be used to also support Eastvale staff at all city council meetings.

1.00 $10,350.00
$10,350.00
Service
[VIDEO]:
- Develop concept, write script and storyboard one (2) two- minute video using animation to tell the housing element story. - JPW to schedule, film and produce video.
-
NOTE:

Please see notes section below.

1.00 $7,500.00
$7,500.00
Service
[GRAPHIC SUPPORT]:
- JPW will create up to 10 infographics that can be used for presentations, on the website, in email blasts, and on social media.
- Any additional graphics support not listed in other services can be captured under this service line.

1.00 $5,400.00
$5,400.00
Service
[PROJECT MANAGEMENT; TRACK AND MEASURE]:
- Weekly project team meetings and other ad hoc meetings as directed by client.
- Prep weekly status reports on deliverables + monthly
analytics reporting.

1.00 $5,405.00
$5,405.00
Estimate Total
$44,400.00
Notes
This estimate includes labor for video and survey, however, to maximize support services available, the City of Eastvale can pay vendors directly for expenses listed:
- Motion graphics video estimate: $4,000
- Online survey distribution estimate: $1,100

RJV #4832-5390-9�32 ,2
EXHIBIT "A-5"
TASK ORDER #5 SEE ATTACHED
330
Item Type
Description
Quantity
Unit Price
Amount
Service
[REDISCOVERY INTERNAL EXERCISE]
Public outreach re-discovery with the project team to
understand project goals and public participation goals.

1.00 $1,500.00
$1,500.00
Service
[STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS PLAN]:

Prepare a strategic communications plan that will outline standardized messaging, key message points, calls to action, and an outreach strategy with consistent messaging to see the highest engagement rate

1.00 $3,500.00
$3,500.00
Service
[PROJECT MANAGEMENT]:

Team meetings, project oversight, program work to keep
outreach on track

1.00 $3,800.00
$3,800.00
Service
[VIDEO/EDITING]:

Develop a video concept, write script and storyboard for a 90- second to 2-minute video. Includes a full-day onsite video shoot filming and production; Includes editing of drone and video footage, creation of graphics, and voiceover

1.00 $9,800.00
$9,800.00
Estimate Total
$18,600.00
From JPW Communications 2710 Loker Avenue W
Suite 300
Carlsbad, CA 92010
Estimate For
City of Eastvale
12363 Limonite Avenue
Suite 910
Eastvale, CA
91752
Estimate ID
153
Issue Date
10/08/2021
Subject
City of Eastvale Mobility, Safety & Connectivity
Outreach

RJV #4832-5390-9�32 ,2
EXHIBIT "A-6"
TASK ORDER #6 SEE ATTACHED
332
Item Type
Description
Quantity
Unit Price
Amount
Service
[REDISCOVERY INTERNAL EXERCISE]
Public outreach re-discovery with the project team to
understand project goals and public participation goals.

1.00 $1,500.00
$1,500.00
Service
[STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS PLAN]:

Prepare a strategic communications plan that will outline standardized messaging, key message points, calls to action, and an outreach strategy with consistent messaging to see the highest engagement rate

1.00 $3,500.00
$3,500.00
Service
[VIDEO/EDITING]:

Develop a video concept, write script and storyboard for a 90- second to 2-minute video. Includes a full-day onsite video shoot filming and production; Includes editing of drone and video footage, creation of graphics, and voiceover

1.00 $9,800.00
$9,800.00
Service
[PROJECT MANAGEMENT]:

Team meetings, project oversight, program work to keep
outreach on track

1.00 $3,800.00
$3,800.00
Estimate Total
$18,600.00
From JPW Communications 2710 Loker Avenue W
Suite 300
Carlsbad, CA 92010
Estimate For
City of Eastvale
12363 Limonite Avenue
Suite 910
Eastvale, CA
91752
Estimate ID
153
Issue Date
10/08/2021
Subject
City of Eastvale Mobility, Safety & Connectivity
Outreach

Item Type
Description
Quantity
Unit Price
Amount
Service
[PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT/STRATEGIC PLAN]
Execute outreach engagement plan including all touchpoints leading up to community meeting. Includes the creation of PPT presentation, meeting invite, creation of a FAQ, coordination of speakers, creation of a hybrid meeting model including, in- person meeting coordination including a run-of-show, meeting moderation, assistance with needed outreach material, website updates, and social media posts to support public meetings

1.00 $10,000.00
$10,000.00
Service
[PROJECT MANAGEMENT]
Team meetings, project oversight, program of work to keep outreach on track

1.00 $1,600.00
$1,600.00
Estimate Total
$11,600.00
From JPW Communications 2710 Loker Avenue W
Suite 300
Carlsbad, CA 92010
Estimate For
City of Eastvale
12363 Limonite Avenue
Suite 910
Eastvale, CA
91752
Estimate ID
178
Issue Date
01/19/2022
Subject
City of Eastvale Mobility, Safety & Connectivity
Outreach

RJV #4832-5390-9�32 ,2
EXHIBIT "A-7"
TASK ORDER #7 SEE ATTACHED
335
Item Type
Description
Quantity
Unit Price
Amount
Service
Establish video concept, write script and storyboard for a 2- minute video. Includes a full-day onsite video shoot, filming, and production; Includes editing of drone and video footage, creation of video graphics, and voiceover. (2) rounds of edits without incurring additional hourly costs.

1.00 $9,800.00
$9,800.00
Estimate Total
$9,800.00
From JPW Communications 2710 Loker Avenue W
Suite 300
Carlsbad, CA 92010
Estimate For
City of Eastvale
12363 Limonite Avenue
Suite 910
Eastvale, CA
91752
Estimate ID
179
Issue Date
01/19/2022
Subject
City of Eastvale Mobility, Safety & Connectivity
PSA

RJV #4832-5390-9�32 ,2
EXHIBIT "A-8"
TASK ORDER #8 SEE ATTACHED
337
Item Type
Description
Quantity
Unit Price
Amount
Service
[Graphic services for tradeshow booth]
- Creation of all graphics for modular booth
- Brochure creation
- PPT or video for booth display

1.00 $9,800.00
$9,800.00
Service
Google ad buy for restaurant and retail space including the promotion and sponsorship of blog posts

1.00 $6,000.00
$6,000.00
Product
[Project management]
- As needed project and account oversight to execute
initiatives

1.00 $3,200.00
$3,200.00
Estimate Total
$19,000.00
Notes
ESTIMATE DISCLAIMER. Any estimate provided is merely an opinion of possible costs that could be encountered, based on the knowledge and experience of the project manager. The estimate is NOT a guarantee for work to be carried out.

From JPW Communications 2710 Loker Avenue W
Suite 300
Carlsbad, CA 92010
Estimate For
City of Eastvale
12363 Limonite Avenue
Suite 910
Eastvale, CA
91752
Estimate ID
174
Issue Date
01/19/2022
Subject
City of Eastvale Economic Development
Community Outreach Support

RJV #4832-5390-9�32 ,2
EXHIBIT "A -8 (AMMENDED)"
TASK ORDER #8 AMMENDED

SEE ATTACHED
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
EXHIBIT "A-9"
TASK ORDER #9

SEE ATTACHED
349
Item Type
Description
Quantity
Unit Price
Amount
Service
Task 1 - Project Website

- The client will provide content to post to a project-specific page eastvaleelevates.com, including:
* On-going updates
* Workshop announcements, materials, and summaries
* Surveys
* Any reports for public review
* Placement of provided renderings and visual concepts of the future site

1.00 $5,385.00
$5,385.00
Estimate Total
$5,385.00
Notes
Assumptions

The City of Eastvale will take care of direct cost billable expenses directly through the city From JPW Communications 2710 Loker Avenue W
Suite 300
Carlsbad, CA 92010
Estimate For
City of Eastvale
12363 Limonite Avenue
Suite 910
Eastvale, CA
91752
Estimate ID
227
Issue Date
08/22/2022
Subject
City of Eastvale Economic Development
Support

EXHIBIT "A-10"
TASK ORDER #10

SEE ATTACHED
351
Item Type
Description
Quantity
Unit Price
Amount
Service
Task 1 - Public/Marketing Collateral

-Graphics/print materials
- JPW will develop content,
graphics and visuals to be used in project outreach. Collateral pieces will include:

* (1) Brochure

* (1) Construction site banner design. Does not include printing.

* Sales kit including folder, one sheet, leasing option sheet, (1) battle card that talks about two or three areas that highlight the development differentiators

.
* Each collateral piece will have up to two rounds of revisions without incurring additional costs.
- Social media
- The project team will provide a fiscal year
calendar with 1-2 social media posts a week including
milestones, pop-up event announcements and workshops.

The
team will consider targeted ads on social media designed to engage the business, real estate and development of key audiences. *Does not include the cost to run targeted ads on social media
- Email template and content calendar

- The project team
will provide an email template and a fiscal year monthly blog calendar that will include (1) written blog topic per month to support the project progress. This will be used to create a buzz about the project which can be cross-promoted using other outsourcing elements such as industry-specific publications.

1.00 $24,525.00
$24,525.00
Service
Task 2 - Account Management:

* Project team meetings (monthly)
* Communications team meetings (biweekly)
* Project management

1.00 $18,460.00
$18,460.00
Estimate Total
$42,985.00
Notes
Assumptions

The City of Eastvale will take care of direct cost billable expenses directly through the city From JPW Communications 2710 Loker Avenue W
Suite 300
Carlsbad, CA 92010
Estimate For
City of Eastvale
12363 Limonite Avenue
Suite 910
Eastvale, CA
91752
Estimate ID
224
Issue Date
08/16/2022
Subject
City of Eastvale Economic Development
Support

Staff Level Coordinator
Senior
Coordinator
Specialist /
Multimedia
Designer
Senior
Specialist
MarCom
Manager
Senior
Multimedia
Designer /
Senior
MarCom
Manager
MarCom or
Creative
Director
Senior
Director
Vice
President
Senior Vice
President
President &
Founder
Video &
Photo
Production
Partners Media  buy
Rate  $               85   $              100   $             115   $          130   $              145   $             160   $              175   $              190   $              205   $             220   $             250  195$               ‐ $ TASKS
TASK 1.  PUBLIC/MARKETING

COLLATERAL
Graphics/print materials 6 8 24 2 40 $6,130.00
Social media 26 12 16 2 56 $8,030.00
Email template and content calendar 26 22 4 4 56 $7,910.00 (1) PowerPoint template for
presentations with animations, talking
points, and custom graphics* 321 0 1 16 $2,455.00
TASK 2. ACCOUNT MANAGEMENT

SERVICES
Project
Management/Logistics/Meetings/
Agendas 48 40 32 4 124 $18,460.00
TOTALS: 292 $42,985.00
Estimate | Project Team Hours Per Task
Estimated
Hours per
Task Estimated  Cost
353
JPWCOMMUNICATIONS 2710 Loker Avenue W., Suite 300 Carlsbad, CA 92010 jpwcomm.com | 760.683.8395

JPW Communications Rate Sheet – 2022 The following sets forth the current rate schedule for JPW Communications. All work is charged in 15-minute increments and billed at the end of each month unless otherwise arranged via a set contract. Position Rate/Hour President $250 Senior Vice President $220 Vice President $205 Senior Director $190 Director $175 Senior Manager $160 Manager $145 Senior Multimedia Designer $145 Senior Specialist $130 Specialist $115 Multimedia Designer $115 Senior Coordinator $100 Production Artist $85 Coordinator $85 Administrative Assistant $85 354
Item Type
Description
Quantity
Unit Price
Amount
Service
Task 1 - Project Management -

- Host (9) monthly half-hour meetings to provide key updates and solicit client feedback. Meetings will start in October 2022 and conclude in June 2023.
- Attendance of (5) additional on-hour meetings as requested by the client.
- Contract management, logistics, agendas, and reporting.

1.00 $8,450.00
$8,450.00
Service
Task 2 - Comprehensive Website Updates -

Website Narrative Revisions

- JPW will rewrite and publish the website's content to focus on providing information that will entice companies to open in Eastvale in various segments including restaurants, retail, business services, food & drug, building & construction, and wholesale & commercial manufacturing. The content must
encourage small and corporate businesses to open a business, as opposed to highlighting industry-specific background information.

Video Update

- JPW will update the website's home page video reel up to (1 time). The video reel will not exceed 20-seconds in length and will be created with existing video/photo assets made available to JPW.

ADA Compliance

- JPW will ensure the website adheres to the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 at level AA to the extent possible.

1.00 $7,015.00
$7,015.00
From JPW Communications 2710 Loker Avenue W
Suite 300
Carlsbad, CA 92010
Estimate For
City of Eastvale
12363 Limonite Avenue
Suite 910
Eastvale, CA
91752
Estimate ID
234
PO Number
1094
Issue Date
09/22/2022
Subject
Eastvale Elevates Website Updates and Support

Service
Task 3 - General Website Maintenance -

Data and Document Updates

- JPW will receive new documents, data, and contents from the city on a monthly basis and shall update the website in the priority order of "critical," "important," "normal," and "minor," in accordance with Bugherd parameters.

Webpage Development

- At the request of city staff, JPW shall plan to create up to (5) additional pages on the site. The development will include (1) wireframe, (5) webpage creative layouts to fit within wireframe, and up to (2) rounds of revisions per page without incurring additional costs. If additional changes need to be made, JPW will bill at the current billable rate. Eastvale will be required to provide approved written content to support the webpage story.
- Creative development to support the (5) webpage stories including infographics, image Photoshopping, and icons. Up to (2) rounds of revisions per page without incurring additional costs. If additional changes need to be made, JPW will bill at the current billable rate.
- SEO, SEM, alt text for each page to ensure rankings on major search engines

1.00 $9,985.00
$9,985.00
Service
Billable Expenses

- Translation of one sheet into Spanish, Simplified and Traditional Chinese

1.00 $1,440.00
$1,440.00
Estimate Total
$26,890.00

JPWCOMMUNICATIONS 2710 Loker Avenue W., Suite 300 Carlsbad, CA 92010 jpwcomm.com | 760.683.8395

JPW Communications Rate Sheet – 2022 The following sets forth the current rate schedule for JPW Communications. All work is charged in 15-minute increments and billed at the end of each month unless otherwise arranged via a set contract. Position Rate/Hour President $250 Senior Vice President $220 Vice President $205 Senior Director $190 Director $175 Photographer $175 Videographer $175 Senior Manager $160 Manager $145 Senior Multimedia Designer $145 Senior Specialist $130 Specialist $115 Multimedia Designer $115 Senior Coordinator $100 Production Artist $85 Coordinator $85 Administrative Assistant $85 357
Project Estimator
Tasks
President Senior Vice
President Vice President Website
Programmer Senior Director Creative
Director Director Videographer Photographer Senior
Manager
Senior
Multimedia
Designer
Manager Senior
Specialist
Multimedia
Designer Specialist Senior
Coordinator
Production
Artist Coordinator Admin
Assistant Total Hours Total  Dollars ($)
Rates 250$                   220$                   205$                   195$                   190$                   175$                   175$                   175$                   175$                   160$                   160$                   145$                   130$                   115$                   115$                   100$                   85$                     85$                     85$ Task 1: Project Management
Host (9) monthly half‐hour meetings from Oct. 22 ‐ June 23 5                      5                      5                      15                     2,250.00$ Attendance of (5) additional on‐hour meetings as requested by client 5                      5                      5                      15                     2,250.00$ Client contract management, logistics, agendas, and reporting 10                    8                      8                      26                     3,950.00$                                   $ Subtotal Task 1: Project Management ‐                   ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    20                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    18                    18                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    56                    8,450.00$ Task 2: Comprehensive Website UpdatesRewrite website content for restaurants, retail, business services, food & drug, building & construction, wholesale & commercial manufacturing 8                      12                    3                      23                     3,530.00$ Update website's home page video reel (1) time throughout contract. Video will not exceed 20‐second in length. Eastvale to provide video/assets as needed 2                      4                      6                       990.00$ Ensure website adheres to Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) at level AA to the extent possible 8                      3                      6                      17                     2,495.00$                                   $ Subtotal Task 2: Comprehensive Website Updates ‐                   ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    10                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    12                    15                    9                      ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    46                    7,015.00$ Task 3: General Website Maintenance
Monthly data and document updates based on priority  2                      15                    4                      8                      29                     4,370.00$ Up to (5) webpage or form development including wireframe and creative mockup. Client to provide approved content and images for placement. Includes up to (3) rounds of revisions before hourly rate 20                    2                      22                     3,460.00$ Creative development for up to (5) webpages including infographics, image Photoshopping, and icons 8                      8                       1,280.00$ SEO, SEM, Alt text for each page to ensure rankings on major search engines 5                      5                       875.00$ Subtotal Task 3: General Website Maintenance ‐                   ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    7                      ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    43                    4                      10                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    64                    9,985.00$ Labor Subtotal ‐                   ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    37                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    55                    37                    37                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    166                  25,450.00$ Labor Contingency ‐$
Total Labor 25,450.00$
Billable Expenses
Translation of one sheet into Spanish 600.00$
Translation of one sheet into Simplified/Traditional Chinese 600.00$ Other ‐$
Subtotal Billable Expenses 1,200.00$
Markup (20%) 240.00$
Total Billable Expenses 1,440.00$
TOTAL 26,890.00$
Assumptions
358

AGENDA STAFF REPORT

City Council Meeting

CONSENT CALENDAR

Agenda Item No. 11.11
October 26, 2022
Acceptance of California Automated Processing (CalAPP) Grant Award of up to $60,000 towards Automa-ng the City of Eastvale’s Solar Permitting Process
Prepared By:

Eva Terekhova, Emergency Management Specialist
Recommended Action(s)
Staff recommends that the City Council approve acceptance of the CalAPP Grant in the amount of $60,000.

Summary
The California Energy Commission is funding a program to assist local governments in California with establishing online, automated solar permi&ng. The City was awarded a reimbursable amount of up to $60,000 of CalAPP grant funding. Planned expenditures to date amount to an es(mated $5,500 in fees to Gray Quarter, Inc. for integra(ng the automa(c solar permi&ng pla,orm, SolarApp+ into the City’s current permit processing system, Accela.

Background
Senate Bill 129 (Skinner, Budget Act of 2021) authorized the appropria(on of $20 million from the State General Fund to be used to support a grant program for California local governments to establish online solar permi&ng. The grant funding is intended to help local governments in California recover the cost of establishing an eligible automated, online solar permi&ng pla,orm. In most cases, most of the funding will be used to reimburse staff or consultant (me associated with implemen(ng the so7ware. The maximum grant amount per jurisdic(on is determined by the latest estimated population available from the California Department of Finance.

The City of Eastvale qualified for a maximum of $60,000 of grant funding (refer to A<achment 1). 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752 951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
359
The City solicited a quote from Gray Quarter (refer to A<achment 2) for implemen(ng SolarAPP+, an online pla,orm that instantly issues permits for code-compliant residen(al photovoltaic (PV) systems. SolarAPP+ is free for communi(es to adopt, but there are associated costs for integra(on of the pla,orm into the City’s current automated permit processing system. Other possible costs, billable to the CalAPP grant are staff (me spent on grant administra(on as well as other allowable costs associated with automating solar permits.

Following the adop(on and launch of a qualifying permi&ng pla,orm, the Energy Commission may request annual data rela(ng to this program. Requested data would include the number of permits issued in a given period of (me, as well as relevant characteris(cs of the permi<ed systems such as system capacity.

Environmental
The acceptance, alloca(on and expenditure of funds is not a Project as determined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and as such, no environmental review is required.

Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: N/A
| Target #: N/A
| Goal #: N/A
Not Applicable.

Fiscal Impact
Potential reimbursement of up to $60,000 for allowable costs.

Prior City Council/Commission Action
Not Applicable.

Attachment(s)
Attachement 1 - Eastvale CalAPP Grant Agreement.pdf

Attachment 2 - Estimate Gray Quarter Inc.pdf

12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
Exhibit C

CONTACT LIST

July 2022 Page 1 of 1 APP-22-001
City of Eastvale

California Energy Commission Recipient: City of Eastvale Commission Agreement Manager:

Adam Van Winkle
California Energy Commission
716 P Street, MS-45
Sacramento, CA 95814
Phone: (916) 891-9060
e-mail: [email protected]

Project Manager:

Johnny Terfehr
Community Safety Director
12363 Limonite Ave, Ste. 910
Eastvale, CA, 91752
Phone: (951) 703-8761
e-mail: [email protected]
Confidential Deliverables/Products
California Energy Commission
Contracts, Grants, and Loans Officer
715 P Street MS-18
Sacramento, CA 95814

Administrator:

Henry Garcia
Interim City Manager
12363 Limonite Ave, Ste. 910
Eastvale, CA, 91752
Phone: (951) 703-4424
e-mail: [email protected]
Invoices, Progress Reports and Non-
Confidential Deliverables to:

California Energy Commission
Accounting Officer
715 P Street MS-2
Sacramento, CA 95814
Email PDF of Payment Request invoice
packet to: [email protected]
Accounting Officer:

Maggie Torres
Senior Accounting Technician
12363 Limonite Ave, Ste. 910
Eastvale, CA, 91752
Phone: (951) 703-4436
e-mail:
[email protected]

Legal Notices:

Tatyana Yakshina
Grants Manager
715 P Street MS-18
Sacramento, CA 95814
Phone: (916) 827-9294
e-mail: [email protected]

Recipient Legal Notices:

Marc Donohue
City Clerk
12363 Limonite Ave, Ste. 910
Eastvale, CA, 91752
Phone: (951) 703-4421
e-mail: [email protected]
371
Item Type
Description
Quantity
Unit Price
Amount
Service
SolarApp+:
- Create a record type for SolarApp
- Utilize the zip files provided by Accela listed in link below.

How do I set up SolarAPP+ with Accela permitting software? - SolarAPP+ Knowledge Base (solar-app.org)
- Permits module will be used in place of the building module Assumptions:
- No additional scripting will be done for the SolarApp. - This record is not integrated with SolarApp
- A new record will be created utilizing the zip files provided by https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/CivicAppRequest.

30.00 $185.00
$5,550.00
Estimate Total
$5,550.00
Estimate
From
Gray Quarter, Inc.
8575 Morro Road
Atascadero CA 93422
www.grayquarter.com
[email protected]
Estimate For
City of Eastvale, CA
Estimate ID
359
Issue Date
07/08/2022
Subject
Solar App

AGENDA STAFF REPORT

City Council Meeting

CONSENT CALENDAR

Agenda Item No. 11.12
October 26, 2022
Approval of Professional Services Agreement with Onward Engineering for Consul,ng Services in the Public Works Division as Substitution for Current Consulting Services Contract
Prepared By:

Jimmy Chung, City Engineer
Recommended Action(s)
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the Professional Services Agreement with Onward Engineering for Consulng Services in the Public Works Division in the amount of $148,000 and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreements.

Summary
The Engineering Division is responsible for overseeing the design and construcon of private development and managing capital/public projects. The division collects development fees, processes permits, and provides inspecons for a variety of construcon and non-construcon acvies within the public right-of-way. The services offered by the Engineering Division ensures compliance of City Codes and design standards. The Engineering Division also reviews, coordinate, approve, monitor, manage, and enforce approximately 400 encroachment permits per year in addition to the private land development related permit coordination work.

The Public Works Department is commi1ed to the maintenance and operaon of the City of Eastvale’s infrastructure. This includes ensuring the safety and quality of: streets, sidewalks, curb and gu1er, curb ramps, medians, landscaping, traffic signals, street lights, traffic signs, storm drain inlets, etc. Through iniaves such as the Capital Improvement Program, the Public Works staff actively improves the City’s infrastructure.
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
373
Background
The consultant would be responsible for the following:

- performing reviewing, reading, and understanding simple construcon drawings and interpreng and explaining simple Public Works regulations and standards - reviewing permit applicaons, interacng with the general public, maintaining records and files, and performing other project related duties as requested - supporting the Public Works permitting process and other Public Works related needs - providing field services including management of minor public works maintenance related projects; and monitoring and responding to non-emergency issues that are reported through the My Eastvale app by the Eastvale residents
- supporting current city consultants from
MCE and Econolite in order
to keep the Public Works field
operations running smoothly

Onward Engineering has demonstrated both experience and qualificaons that meet Eastvale's needs and expectaons, and are capable of providing the necessary professional services immediately. This contract will provide field technician and permit technician consulng services for not-to-exceed 1,000 hours for each position.

A substanal amount of service hours by this consultant is cost recoverable via development deposit or permit fees. The majority of remaining work hours associated with Public Works, Streets, and Public Right of Way will be paid with Measure A and Gas Tax.

Environmental
The proposed contract is not a project as defined by the California environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and as such, no environmental review is required.

Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: 3
| Target #: 3
| Goal #: 6
Ensure the City revenues align with expenditures
Fiscal Impact
Budget is available in fiscal year 2022-23 the following accounts:

Fund
Account Number
Description
Available FY 22-23
Budget
General Fund
200-500-6490
Other Contract
services
$300,000
General Fund
100-320-6433
Public Works -
Private
Developments
$771,987.50

The contract is based on a hourly rate schedule with a total not-to-exceed amount of $148,000.

Corresponding accounts will be used depending on the task performed. This agreement is to replace the contract services provided by a single source. There is no financial impact ancipated at this time.
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
374
Prior City Council/Commission Action
There has been no prior Council action.

Attachment(s)
Attachment 1 - PSA with Onward

12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
375
- 1 -

AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES
Consulting Services

This Agreement for Services (“Agreement”) is entere d into as of this ____ day of _________, 2022 by and between the City of Eastvale , a municipal corporation (“City”) and Onward Engineering (“Contractor”). City and Co ntractor are sometimes hereinafter individually referred to as “Party” and hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Parties.”

RECITALS
A. City has sought, by informal quote the performan ce of the services defined and described particularly in Section 2 of this Agreement.

B. Contractor, following submission of a quote for the performance of the services defined and described particularly in Section 2 of this Agreement, was selected by the City to perform those services.

C. The Parties desire to formalize the selection of Contractor for performance of those services defined and described particularl y in Section 2 of this Agreement and desire that the terms of that performance be as par ticularly defined and described herein.

OPERATIVE PROVISIONS
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual prom ises and covenants made by the Parties and contained here and other co nsideration, the value and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:

SECTION 1. TERM OF AGREEMENT.

Subject to the provisions of Section 20 "Terminatio n of Agreement" of this Agreement, the Term of this Agreement shall commenc e on the date first ascribed above and terminate upon completion of the 1,000 ho urs of each Consulting Staff and final payment is rendered to the Contractor.

SECTION 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES.
(a) Scope of Services. Contractor agrees to perfor m the services set forth in Exhibit “A” “Scope of Services” (hereinafter, the “ Services”) and made a part of this Agreement by this reference.

SECTION 3. ADDITIONAL SERVICES.

Contractor shall not be compensated for any work re ndered in connection with its performance of this Agreement that are in addition to or outside of the Services unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing in accordance with Section 26 “Administration and Implementation” or S ection 28 “Amendment” of this Agreement. If and when such additional work is aut horized, such additional work shall be deemed to be part of the Services.
376
- 2 -

SECTION 4. COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT.
(a) Subject to any limitations set forth in this Ag reement, City agrees to pay Contractor the amounts specified in Exhibit “B” “Co mpensation” and made a part of this Agreement by this reference. The total compensatio n, including reimbursement for actual expenses, shall not exceed One Hundred Forty -Eight Thousand dollars ($148,000), unless additional compensation is appro ved in writing in accordance with Section 26 “Administration and Implementation” or S ection 28 “Amendment” of this Agreement.
(b) Each month Contractor shall furnish to City an original invoice for all work performed and expenses incurred during the precedin g month. The invoice shall detail charges by the following categories: labor (by sub- category), travel, materials, equipment, supplies, and subcontractor contracts. Subcontractor charges shall be detailed by the following categories: labor, travel , materials, equipment and supplies. If the compensation set forth in subsection (a) and Ex hibit “B” include payment of labor on an hourly basis (as opposed to labor and materials being paid as a lump sum), the labor category in each invoice shall include detailed de scriptions of task performed and the amount of time incurred for or allocated to that ta sk. City shall independently review each invoice submitted by the Contractor to determi ne whether the work performed and expenses incurred are in compliance with the provisions of this Agreement. In the event that no charges or expenses are disputed, the invoi ce shall be approved and paid according to the terms set forth in subsection (c). In the event any charges or expenses are disputed by City, the original invoice shall be returned by City to Contractor for correction and resubmission.
(c) Except as to any charges for work performed or expenses incurred by Contractor which are disputed by City, City will us e its best efforts to cause Contractor to be paid within thirty (30) days of receipt of Co ntractor’s correct and undisputed invoice.
(d) Payment to Contractor for work performed pursua nt to this Agreement shall not be deemed to waive any defects in work performed by Contractor.

SECTION 5. INSPECTION AND FINAL ACCEPTANCE.

City may inspect and accept or reject any of Contra ctor’s work under this Agreement, either during performance or when comple ted. City shall reject or finally accept Contractor’s work within sixty (60) days aft er submitted to City. City shall reject work by a timely written explanation, otherwise Con tractor’s work shall be deemed to have been accepted. City’s acceptance shall be conclusive as to such work except with respect to latent defects, fraud and such gross mis takes as amount to fraud.

Acceptance of any of Contractor’s work by City shal l not constitute a waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement including, but not limited to, Section 16 “Indemnification” and Section 17 “Insurance.”
SECTION 6. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS.

All original maps, models, designs, drawings, photo graphs, studies, surveys, 377
- 3 -

reports, data, notes, computer files, files and oth er documents prepared, developed or discovered by Contractor in the course of providing the Services pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of City an d may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by City without the permissio n of the Contractor. Upon completion, expiration or termination of this Agree ment, Contractor shall turn over to City all such original maps, models, designs, drawi ngs, photographs, studies, surveys, reports, data, notes, computer files, files and other documents.

If and to the extent that City utilizes for any purpose not related to this Agreement any maps, models, designs, drawings, photographs, s tudies, surveys, reports, data, notes, computer files, files or other documents pre pared, developed or discovered by Contractor in the course of providing the Services pursuant to this Agreement, Contractor’s guarantees and warranties in Section 9 “Standard of Performance” of this Agreement shall not extend to such use of the maps, models, designs, drawings, photographs, studies, surveys, reports, data, notes , computer files, files or other documents.

All final work product developed by Contractor in t he course of providing the Services pursuant to this Agreement shall become th e sole property of City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by City witho ut the permission of the Contractor. Upon completion, expiration or termina tion of this Agreement, Contractor shall turn over to City all such final work product if paid for by the City. This provision specifically excludes Contractors’ work notes and d rafts, which are owned by Contractor, not City.

SECTION 7. CONTRACTOR'S BOOKS AND RECORDS.
(a) Contractor shall maintain any and all documents and records demonstrating or relating to Contractor’s performan ce of the Services. Contractor shall maintain any and all ledgers, books of account, inv oices, vouchers, canceled checks, or other documents or records evidencing or relating t o the Services, including expenditures and disbursements charged to City purs uant to this Agreement. Any and all such documents or records shall be maintained i n accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be suffici ently complete and detailed so as to permit an accurate evaluation of the services provi ded by Contractor pursuant to this Agreement. Any and all such documents or records s hall be maintained for three (3) years from the date of execution of this Agreement and to the extent required by laws relating to audits of public agencies and their exp enditures. In accordance with California Government Code Section 8546.7, if the t otal compensation in Section 4 exceeds ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00), this Agr eement and the Contractor's books and records related to this Agreement shall be subj ect to the examination and audit of the State Auditor, at the request of City or as par t of any audit of the City, for a period of three (3) years after final payment under the Agreement. (b) Any and all records or documents required to be maintained pursuant to this section shall be made available for inspection, audit and copying, at any time during regular business hours, upon request by City or its designated representative. Copies of such documents or records shall be provided dire ctly to the City for inspection, audit 378
- 4 -

and copying when it is practical to do so; otherwis e, unless an alternative is mutually agreed upon, such documents and records shall be ma de available at Contractor’s address indicated for receipt of notices in this Agreement. (c) Where City has reason to believe that any of th e documents or records required to be maintained pursuant to this section may be lost or discarded due to dissolution or termination of Contractor’s business , City may, by written request, require that custody of such documents or records be given to the City. Access to such documents and records shall be granted to City, as well as to its successors-in-interest and authorized representatives.

SECTION 8. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR.
(a) Contractor is and shall at all times remain a w holly independent contractor and not an officer, employee or agent of City. Con tractor shall have no authority to bind City in any manner, nor to incur any obligation, de bt or liability of any kind on behalf of or against City, whether by contract or otherwise.
(b) The personnel performing the Services under thi s Agreement on behalf of Contractor shall at all times be under Contractor’s exclusive direction and control.

Neither City, nor any elected or appointed boards, officers, officials, employees or agents of City, shall have control over the conduct of Contractor or any of Contractor’s personnel. Contractor shall not at any time or in any manner represent that Contractor or any of Contractor’s personnel are in any manner officials, officers, or employees of City.
(c) Neither Contractor, nor any of Contractor’s per sonnel shall obtain any rights to retirement, health care or any other bene fits which may otherwise accrue to City’s employees. Contractor expressly waives any claim Contractor, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, may have to an y such rights. Contractor’s indemnity obligations in Section 16 “Indemnificatio n” of this Agreement include the obligation to indemnify the City from and against a ny liability that may arise related to claims that Contractor, its officers, employees, ag ents or subcontractors, are entitled to retirement, health care or any other benefits that accrue to City employees. This provision shall survive the expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement.

SECTION 9. STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE.

Contractor represents and warrants that it has the qualifications, experience and facilities necessary to properly perform the Servic es required under this Agreement in a thorough, competent and professional manner. Contr actor shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of its ability, experie nce and talent, perform all Services. In meeting its obligations under this Agreement, Contr actor shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing services similar to the Services required of Contra ctor under this Agreement. In addition to the general standards of performance se t forth this section, additional specific standards of performance and performance c riteria may be set forth in Exhibit “A” “Scope of Work” that shall also be applicable t o Contractor’s work under this 379
- 5 -

Agreement. Where there is a conflict between a gen eral and a specific standard of performance or performance criteria, the specific s tandard or criteria shall prevail over the general.

SECTION 10. COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAWS; PERMIT S AND LICENSES.

Contractor shall keep itself informed of and comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, statutes, codes, ordinances, regulations and rules in effect during the term of this Agreement. Contractor shall obtai n any and all licenses, permits and authorizations necessary to perform the Services se t forth in this Agreement. Neither City, nor any elected or appointed boards, officers , officials, employees or agents of City, shall be liable, at law or in equity, as a re sult of any failure of Contractor to comply with this section.

SECTION 11. PREVAILING WAGE LAWS
It is the understanding of City and Contractor that California prevailing wage laws do not apply to this Agreement because the Agreemen t does not involve any of the following services subject to prevailing wage rates pursuant to the California Labor Code or regulations promulgated thereunder: Constru ction, alteration, demolition, installation, or repair work performed on public bu ildings, facilities, streets or sewers done under contract and paid for in whole or in par t out of public funds. In this context, “construction" includes work performed during the design and preconstruction phases of construction including, but not limited to, inspection and land surveying work.

SECTION 12. NONDISCRIMINATION.

Contractor shall not discriminate, in any way, agai nst any person on the basis of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ance stry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, age, sexual orientatio n, or military and veteran status in connection with or related to the performance of this Agreement.

SECTION 13. UNAUTHORIZED ALIENS.

Contractor hereby promises and agrees to comply wit h all of the provisions of the Federal Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C.A. §§ 1101, et seq., as amended, and in connection therewith, shall not employ unauthori zed aliens as defined therein.

Should Contractor so employ such unauthorized alien s for the performance of the Services, and should the any liability or sanctions be imposed against City for such use of unauthorized aliens, Contractor hereby agrees to and shall reimburse City for the cost of all such liabilities or sanctions imposed, together with any and all costs, including attorneys' fees, incurred by City.

SECTION 14. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST.
(a) Contractor covenants that neither it, nor any o fficer or principal of its firm, has or shall acquire any interest, directly or indi rectly, which would conflict in any 380
- 6 -

manner with the interests of City or which would in any way hinder Contractor’s performance of the Services. Contractor further co venants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it as an officer, employee, agent or subcontractor without the express written consent of the City Manager. Contractor agrees to at all times avoid co nflicts of interest or the appearance of any conflicts of interest with the interests of City in the performance of this Agreement.
(b) City understands and acknowledges that Contract or is, as of the date of execution of this Agreement, independently involved in the performance of non-related services for other governmental agencies and privat e parties. Contractor is unaware of any stated position of City relative to such projec ts. Any future position of City on such projects shall not be considered a conflict of interest for purposes of this section. (c) City understands and acknowledges that Contract or will perform non- related services for other governmental agencies an d private Parties following the completion of the Services under this Agreement. A ny such future service shall not be considered a conflict of interest for purposes of this section.

SECTION 15. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION; RELEASE OF IN FORMATION. (a) All information gained or work product produced by Contractor in performance of this Agreement shall be considered c onfidential, unless such information is in the public domain or already know n to Contractor. Contractor shall not release or disclose any such information or work pr oduct to persons or entities other than City without prior written authorization from the City Manager, except as may be required by law.
(b) Contractor, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not, without prior written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney of City, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other i nformation concerning the work performed under this Agreement. Response to a subp oena or court order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Contractor gives Ci ty notice of such court order or subpoena.
(c) If Contractor, or any officer, employee, agent or subcontractor of Contractor, provides any information or work product in violation of this Agreement, then City shall have the right to reimbursement and inde mnity from Contractor for any damages, costs and fees, including attorney's fees, caused by or incurred as a result of Contractor’s conduct.

Contractor shall promptly notify City should Contra ctor, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, be served with any summon s, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed thereunder. City retains th e right, but has no obligation, to represent Contractor or be present at any depositio n, hearing or similar proceeding. 381
- 7 -

Contractor agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Contractor. However, this right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response. Contractor shall not be h eld criminally or civilly liable under any Federal or State trade secret law for the discl osure of a trade secret that is made in confidence to a Federal, State, or local government official or to an attorney solely for the purpose of reporting or investigating a suspect ed violation of law or for the disclosure of a trade secret that is made in a comp laint or other document filed in a lawsuit or other proceeding, if such filing is made under seal.

SECTION 16. INDEMNIFICATION.
(a) Indemnification for Professional Liability. Wh ere the law establishes a professional standard of care for Contractor’s serv ices, to the fullest extent permitted by law, Contractor shall indemnify, protect, defend an d hold harmless City and any and all of its officials, employees and agents (“Indemnifie d Parties”) from and against any and all liability (including liability for claims, suit s, actions, arbitration proceedings, administrative proceedings, regulatory proceedings, losses, expenses or costs of any kind, whether actual, alleged or threatened, includ ing attorneys’ fees and costs, court costs, interest, defense costs, and expert witness fees) arise out of, are a consequence of, or are in any way attributable to, in whole or in part, any negligent or wrongful act, error or omission of Contractor, or by any individu al or entity for which Contractor is legally liable, including but not limited to office rs, agents, employees or subcontractors of Contractor, in the performance of professional services under this Agreement. (b) Indemnification for Other than Professional Lia bility. Other than in the performance of professional services and to the ful l extent permitted by law, Contractor shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless City, and any and all of its employees, officials and agents from and against an y liability (including liability for claims, suits, actions, arbitration proceedings, ad ministrative proceedings, regulatory proceedings, losses, expenses or costs of any kind, whether actual, alleged or threatened, including attorneys’ fees and costs, co urt costs, interest, defense costs, and expert witness fees), where the same arise out of, are a consequence of, or are in any way attributable to, in whole or in part, the perfo rmance of this Agreement by Contractor, or by any individual or entity for whic h Contractor is legally liable, including but not limited to officers, agents, employees or subcontractors of Contractor. (c) Indemnification from Subcontractors. Contracto r agrees to obtain executed indemnity agreements with provisions ident ical to those set forth in this section from each and every subcontractor or any other person or entity involved by, for, with or on behalf of Contractor in the performance of this Agreement naming the Indemnified Parties as additional indemnitees. In the event Contractor fails to obtain such indemnity obligations from others as required herein, Contractor agrees to be fully responsible according to the terms of this section. Failure of City to monitor compliance with these requirements imposes no additional oblig ations on City and will in no way act as a waiver of any rights hereunder. This obligati on to indemnify and defend City as set forth herein is binding on the successors, assigns or heirs of Contractor and shall survive the termination of this Agreement or this section. 382
- 8 -

(d) City’s Negligence. The provisions of this sect ion do not apply to claims occurring as a result of City’s sole negligence. Th e provisions of this section shall not release City from liability arising from gross negl igence or willful acts or omissions of City or any and all of its officials, employees and agents.

SECTION 17. INSURANCE.

Contractor agrees to obtain and maintain in full fo rce and effect during the term of this Agreement the insurance policies set forth in Exhibit “C” “Insurance” and made a part of this Agreement. All insurance policies sha ll be subject to approval by City as to form and content. These requirements are subject t o amendment or waiver if so approved in writing by the City Manager. Contracto r agrees to provide City with copies of required policies upon request.

SECTION 18. ASSIGNMENT.

The expertise and experience of Contractor are mate rial considerations for this Agreement. City has an interest in the qualificati ons and capability of the persons and entities who will fulfill the duties and obligation s imposed upon Contractor under this Agreement. In recognition of that interest, Contra ctor shall not assign or transfer this Agreement or any portion of this Agreement or the p erformance of any of Contractor’s duties or obligations under this Agreement without the prior written consent of the City.

Any attempted assignment shall be ineffective, null and void, and shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement entitling City to any and all remedies at law or in equity, including termination of this Agreement pur suant to Section 20 “Termination of Agreement.” City acknowledges, however, that Contr actor, in the performance of its duties pursuant to this Agreement, may utilize subcontractors.

SECTION 19. CONTINUITY OF PERSONNEL.

Contractor shall make every reasonable effort to ma intain the stability and continuity of Contractor’s staff and subcontractors , if any, assigned to perform the Services. Contractor shall notify City of any chan ges in Contractor’s staff and subcontractors, if any, assigned to perform the Ser vices prior to and during any such performance.

SECTION 20. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT.
(a) City may terminate this Agreement, with or with out cause, at any time by giving thirty (30) days written notice of terminati on to Contractor. In the event such notice is given, Contractor shall cease immediately all work in progress. (b) Contractor may terminate this Agreement for cau se at any time upon thirty (30) days written notice of termination to City.
(c) If either Contractor or City fail to perform an y material obligation under this Agreement, then, in addition to any other remedies, either Contractor, or City may terminate this Agreement immediately upon written notice. 383
- 9 -

(d) Upon termination of this Agreement by either Co ntractor or City, all property belonging exclusively to City which is in Contractor’s possession shall be returned to City. Contractor shall furnish to City a final invoice for work performed and expenses incurred by Contractor, prepared as set fo rth in Section 4 “Compensation and Method of Payment” of this Agreement. This final i nvoice shall be reviewed and paid in the same manner as set forth in Section 4 “Compensa tion and Method of Payment” of this Agreement.

SECTION 21. DEFAULT.

In the event that Contractor is in default under th e terms of this Agreement, the City shall not have any obligation or duty to conti nue compensating Contractor for any work performed after the date of default. Instead, the City may give notice to Contractor of the default and the reasons for the default. Th e notice shall include the timeframe in which Contractor may cure the default. This timeframe is presumptively thirty (30) days, but may be extended, though not reduced, if circums tances warrant. During the period of time that Contractor is in default, the City sha ll hold all invoices and shall, when the default is cured, proceed with payment on the invoi ces. In the alternative, the City may, in its sole discretion, elect to pay some or all of the outstanding invoices during the period of default. If Contractor does not cure the default, the City may take necessary steps to terminate this Agreement under Section 20 “Termination of Agreement.” Any failure on the part of the City to give notice of t he Contractor’s default shall not be deemed to result in a waiver of the City’s legal ri ghts or any rights arising out of any provision of this Agreement.

SECTION 22. EXCUSABLE DELAYS.

Contractor shall not be liable for damages, includi ng liquidated damages, if any, caused by delay in performance or failure to perfor m due to causes beyond the control of Contractor. Such causes include, but are not li mited to, acts of God, acts of the public enemy, acts of federal, state or local gover nments, acts of City, court orders, fires, floods, epidemics, strikes, embargoes, and u nusually severe weather. The term and price of this Agreement shall be equitably adju sted for any delays due to such causes.

SECTION 23. COOPERATION BY CITY.

All public information, data, reports, records, and maps as are existing and available to City as public records, and which are necessary for carrying out the Services shall be furnished to Contractor in every reasonable way to facilitate, without undue delay, the Services to be performed under this Agreement.

SECTION 24. NOTICES.

All notices required or permitted to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be personally delivered, or sent by certified mail, postage prepaid and return receipt requested, addressed as follows:

384
- 10 -

To City: City of Eastvale
Attn: City Manager
12363 Limonite Ave., Suite 910
Eastvale, CA 91752
To Contractor: Onward Engineering
Attn: Majdi Ataya
300 S. Harbor Blvd., Suite 814
Anaheim, CA 92805

Notice shall be deemed effective on the date person ally delivered or, if mailed, three (3) days after deposit of the same in the cus tody of the United States Postal Service.

SECTION 25. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE.

Each of the signatories hereto represents and warra nts that he or she is competent and authorized to enter into this Agreeme nt on behalf of the Party for whom he or she purports to sign. Each Party hereto agree s to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the other Parties hereto against all claim s, suits, actions, and demands, including necessary expenses of investigation and r easonable attorneys' fees and costs, arising out of claims that its signatory was not competent or so authorized to execute this Agreement.

SECTION 26. ADMINISTRATION AND IMPLEMENTATION.

This Agreement shall be administered and executed b y the City Manager or his or her designated representative. The City Manager shall have the authority to issue interpretations and to make amendments to this Agre ement, including amendments that commit additional funds, consistent with Section 28 “Amendment” and the City Manager’s contracting authority under the Eastvale Municipal Code.

SECTION 27. BINDING EFFECT.

This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, exe cutors, administrators, successors and assigns of the Parties.

SECTION 28. AMENDMENT.

No amendment to or modification of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and approved by the Contractor and by the C ity. The City Manager shall have the authority to approve any amendment to this Agre ement if it does not exceed the amount that may be approved administratively pursuant to the Eastvale Municipal Code.

The Parties agree that the requirement for written modifications cannot be waived and that any attempted waiver shall be void. The City’s City Manager may, but is not required to, make minor amendments not affecting su bstantive terms without further authorization from the City Council. The City Counc il hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute any such amendments as required by this Agreement or that do not otherwise reduce City’s rights under this Agreement . All other amendments shall be 385
- 11 -

approved by the City Council.

SECTION 29. WAIVER.

Waiver by any Party to this Agreement of any term, condition, or covenant of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any othe r term, condition, or covenant.

Waiver by any Party of any breach of the provisions of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision nor a wa iver of any subsequent breach or violation of any provision of this Agreement. Acce ptance by City of any work by Contractor shall not constitute a waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement.

SECTION 30. LAW TO GOVERN; VENUE.

This Agreement shall be interpreted, construed and governed according to the laws of the State of California. In the event of l itigation between the Parties, venue in state trial courts shall lie exclusively in the Cou nty of Riverside, California. In the event of litigation in a U.S. District Court, venue shall lie exclusively in the Central District of California, in Riverside.

SECTION 31. ATTORNEYS FEES, COSTS AND EXPENSES.

In the event litigation or other proceeding is requ ired to enforce or interpret any provision of this Agreement, the prevailing Party i n such litigation or other proceeding shall be entitled to an award of reasonable attorne y's fees, costs and expenses, in addition to any other relief to which it may be entitled.

SECTION 32. ENTIRE AGREEMENT.

This Agreement, including the attached Exhibits "A" through "C", is the entire, complete, final and exclusive expression of the Par ties with respect to the matters addressed therein and supersedes all other agreemen ts or understandings, whether oral or written, or entered into between Contractor and City prior to the execution of this Agreement. No statements, representations or other agreements, whether oral or written, made by any Party which are not embodied herein shall be valid and binding.

SECTION 33. SEVERABILITY.

If any term, condition or covenant of this Agreemen t is declared or determined by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby and the Agreement shall be read and construed without the invalid, void or unenforceable provision(s). 386
387
- 13 -

REQUIRED BY THE BYLAWS, ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION, OR

OTHER RULES OR REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO
CONTRACTOR’S BUSINESS ENTITY. CORPORATIONS AND LLCS

MUST SUBMIT DOCUMENTATION SHOWING THAT THE INDIVIDU AL

SIGNING ON ITS BEHALF HAS THE AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS CONTRACT.
388

EXHIBIT "A"

SCOPE OF SERVICES

Onward Engineering (OE) is pleased to present this letter proposal to the City of Eastvale to provide a Permit Technician and Field Technician. The Permit Technician will be tasked with providing information and assistance to the general public, contractors, engineers at the permit counter, over the phone, and via email regarding permit application requirements and processes, Public Works standards and regulations, plan requirements and permit fees. They will also receive and review permit applications and related drawings for accuracy, completeness and compliance with established regulations; issue and record permits; calculate, collect fees and reconcile daily receipts; categorize permit by type, and revenue collected. Additionally they will receive plan check submittals; route plans as appropriate for checking; receive approved plans to calculate fees; inform customers, builders, and developers of plan check status by researching a system, case logs, and associated files and coordinate with appropriate City staff project requirements and submittals. They will also prepare and maintain a variety of records related to the permit and case files as well as receive plans and issue permits for right of way construction or impacts, and grading and/or drainage improvements and assist with processing general invoices and filing. The Permit Technician proposed is Cheryl Kreul, and she is expected to start on November 7th, 2022.

As for the Field Technician, their responsibilities include responding to complaints regarding Public Works related issues and assigning them to an appropriate party to address; establishing and maintaining effective working relationships with those contacted in the course of work; communicating with supervisor as needed to coordinate work activities, reviewing work status, exchanging information, or resolving issues; recommending solutions and responds to questions, concerns, and/or complaints; assisting with the set-up, and maintenance of city related assigned jobs; and managing mini-projects such as miscellaneous concrete repair and sign replacement. The proposed Field Technician is Christopher Koontz, and he is expected to start on November 2nd, 2022.
389

EXHIBIT "B"

COMPENSATION

task project tasks

PERMIT TECHNICIAN

CHERYL KREUL
$70
(hourly)

FIELD TECHNICIAN
CHRIS KOONTZ*
$78
(hourly)
total
1 Permit Technician 1000 $70,000.00
2 Field Technician 1000 $78,000.00
TOTAL 1000 1000 $148,000.00
*The hourly rate for Field Technician includes 30 miles of driving per day within the City. 390

C-1
EXHIBIT "C"

INSURANCE

A. Insurance Requirements. Contractor shall provi de and maintain insurance, acceptable to the City, in full force an d effect throughout the term of this Agreement, against claims for injuries to persons o r damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the Services by Contractor, its agents, representatives or employees. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII.

Contractor shall provide the following scope and l imits of insurance:

1. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:

(1) Commercial General Liability. Insurance Ser vices Office form Commercial General Liability coverage (Occurrence Form CG 0001).

(2) Automobile. Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87) covering Automobile Liability, incl uding code 1 "any auto" and endorsement CA 0025, or equivalent forms subject to the written approval of the City.

(3) Workers’ Compensation. Workers' Compensatio n insurance as required by the Labor Code of State of Californi a covering all persons providing Services on behalf of the Contractor and all risks to such persons under this Agreement.

(4) Professional Liability. Professional liabil ity insurance appropriate to the Contractor’s profession. This c overage may be written on a “claims made” basis, and must include coverage for contract ual liability. The professional liability insurance required by this Agreement must be endorsed to be applicable to claims based upon, arising out of or related to Ser vices performed under this Agreement. The insurance must be maintained for at least three (3) consecutive years following the completion of Contractor’s services o r the termination of this Agreement.

During this additional three (3) year period, Contr actor shall annually and upon request of the City submit written evidence of this continuous coverage.

2. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Contractor shall maintain limits of insurance no less than:

(1) Commercial General Liability. $1,000,000 ge neral
aggregate for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage.

(2) Automobile. $1,000,000 per accident for bod ily injury and property damage. A combined single limit policy wi th aggregate limits in an amount of 391

C-2
not less than $2,000,000 shall be considered equiva lent to the said required minimum limits set forth above.

(3) Workers' Compensation. Workers' Compensatio n as
required by the Labor Code of the State of Californ ia of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence.

(4) Professional Liability. $1,000,000 per occu rrence.

B. Other Provisions. Insurance policies required by this Agreement shall contain the following provisions:

1. All Policies. Each insurance policy required by this Agreement shall be endorsed and state the coverage shall not be suspended, voided, cancelled by the insurer or either Party to this Agreement, redu ced in coverage or in limits except after 30 days' prior written notice by certified ma il, return receipt requested, has been given to City.

2. Commercial General Liability and Automobile Li ability Coverages.

(1) City, and its respective elected and appoint ed officers, officials, and employees and volunteers are to be c overed as additional insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities Cont ractor performs; products and completed operations of Contractor; premises owned, occupied or used by Contractor; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by Con tractor. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of prot ection afforded to City, and their respective elected and appointed officers, officials, or employees.

(2) Contractor’s insurance coverage shall be pri mary insurance with respect to City, and its respective elected an d appointed, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-in surance maintained by City, and its respective elected and appointed officers, official s, employees or volunteers, shall apply in excess of, and not contribute with, Contractor’s insurance.

(3) Contractor’s insurance shall apply separatel y to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is broug ht, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability.

(4) Any failure to comply with the reporting or other provisions of the insurance policies, including breaches of warra nties, shall not affect coverage provided to City, and its respective elected and ap pointed officers, officials, employees or volunteers.

3. Workers' Compensation Coverage. Unless the Ci ty Manager otherwise agrees in writing, the insurer shall agre e to waive all rights of subrogation 392

C-3
against City, and its respective elected and appoin ted officers, officials, employees and agents for losses arising from work performed by Contractor.

C. Other Requirements. Contractor agrees to depos it with City, at or before the effective date of this Agreement, certificates of insurance necessary to satisfy City that the insurance provisions of this contract have been complied with. The City may require that Contractor furnish City with copies of original endorsements effecting coverage required by this Exhibit “C”. The certifi cates and endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bi nd coverage on its behalf. City reserves the right to inspect complete, certified c opies of all required insurance policies, at any time.

1. Contractor shall furnish certificates and endo rsements from each subcontractor identical to those Contractor provides.

2. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions mus t be declared to and approved by City. At the option of City, either th e insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects City or its respective elected or appointed officers, officials, employees and volunteers, or the Contractor shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related inv estigations, claim administration, defense expenses and claims.

3. The procuring of such required policy or polic ies of insurance shall not be construed to limit Contractor’s liability he reunder nor to fulfill the indemnification provisions and requirements of this Agreement.

393

AGENDA STAFF REPORT

City Council Meeting

CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS

Agenda Item No. 13.1
October 26, 2022
Interim Financial Report - Fiscal Year 2021-22, Quarter 4 Prepared By:

Amanda Wells, Finance Director/City Treasurer
Recommended Action(s)
Staff recommends that the City Council Receive and file the Interim Financial Report for Fiscal Year 2021-22, Quarter 4 ending June 30, 2022

Summary
The goal of the Fiscal Year 2021-22 Annual Opera,ng and Capital Improvement Budget served to establish both long-term and short-term financial planning for the City while adhering to regula,ons set by the Governmental Accoun,ng Standards Board (GASB). The comprehensive budget illustrates City Council’s commitment to providing cost effec,ve municipal services. City Council adopts an opera,ng and capital improvement budget every year, which commits resources for the accomplishment of the City’s Strategic Plan, policies, and execu,on of services to the public. The budget report iden,fies target areas while measuring achievements to ensure departments remain transparent and on track. An abundant amount of ,me, analysis, and data from various resources helps establish projec,ons to forecast proper revenue and expenditure budgets. The budget is a dynamic document that is amended throughout the year for various reasons, including City Council ac,ons on department requests, ac,ons by third par,es which impact the budget plan, or changes in the economy.

The Quarterly Interim Financial Report is intended to serve as an update to Council on the City's revenue and expenditure performance with respect to budget. This par,cular Interim Financial Report is for the fourth quarter (4) of fiscal year 2021-22 ending June 30, 2022. The figures in the a;ached reports represent the unaudited financials as of October 17, 2022. The period ending June 30, 2022 includes the 2021-22 Mid-Year adjustments and over 98% of the accoun,ng entries 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752 951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
394
required to close the fiscal year in prepara,on for the annual audit. However, it is important to note that the figures contained within the report do not reflect audited financials, and figures may be adjusted in accordance with audit standards. The General Fund is expected to complete the fiscal year with a $34.5 million budget surplus and a total of $96.4 million in available fund balance.

Background
Detail regarding the Interim Financial Report can be found in attachment 1, Interim Financial Report.

Environmental
Government fiscal ac,vi,es and budget appropria,ons are not considered a Project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and no environmental review is required.

Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: 3
| Target #: 3
| Goal #: 6
Ensure that City revenues align with expenditures.

Fiscal Impact
The interim report for Quarter 4 of fiscal year 2021-22 does not cause a fiscal impact to the city. No action regarding revenue or expenditure budget is requested of the City Council at this time.

Prior City Council/Commission Action
In prepara,on for the adop,on of the Fiscal-Year 2021-22 Annual Opera,ng Budget staff followed the budget ,meline as presented at the January 13, 2021 council mee,ng. On January 29, 2021 a Strategic Plan Workshop was held. Addi,onally, City Council was also presented with two budget goal seJng sessions conducted on February 24, 2021 and March 10, 2021. On March 24, 2021 the revised strategic plan was adopted. On April 14, 2021 the Council voted to increase the law enforcement contract by two Special Enforcement Team depu,es, effec,ve with the new fiscal year budget. On June 9, 2021 the draK budget was presented to Council with one subsequent change regarding fully funding a fire business inspector with Riverside County Fire and adding a Wildland Protec,on Agreement with Cal Fire. On June 23, 2021 the Council unanimously adopted the budget. On December 8, 2021 the City Council received and filed the first quarter interim report for fiscal year 2021-22. On March 13, 20222 the City Council received and filed the second quarter interim report for fiscal year 2021-22. On July 27, 20222 the City Council received and filed the third quarter interim report for fiscal year 2021-22.

Attachment(s)
Attachment 1: Interim Financial Report - FY 2021-22 Quarter 4

12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
395

EASTVALE

CALIFORNIA

CITY OF

INTERIM FINANCIAL REPORT
QUARTER FOUR | 12 MONTHS
FISCAL YEAR 2021 - 2022
396
Executive Summary
City of Eastvale UNAUDITED
Fiscal Year 2021-22
Interim Financial Report | QUARTER FOUR ending June 30, 2022 | 12 months, 98% Reported

City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 1

REPORT OVERVIEW
On June 23, 2021, the City Council adopted the Fiscal Year 2021-22 budget and on January 12, 2022, the Fiscal Year 2021- 22 Mid-Year review was presented and adopted. The interim financial report is prepared by the Finance Department and contains informa�on related to the fiscal year 2021-22 budget and actual ac�vity for revenues and expenditures for the 12-month period ending June 30, 2022. The figures contained in this report are unaudited.

QUARTER 4 HIGHLIGHTS: Key changes impacting the city during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2021-22 Prior Fiscal Year Notes: The city ended the prior fiscal year with a budget surplus of $25.3 million. The surplus is due to several factors . The overwhelming majority of the surplus is due to a change in the city’s sales tax receipts.

Addi�onally, the City experienced savings in its largest department in the General Fund, Law Enforcement. L aw enforcement had a budget surplus due to a carried forward budge�ng error and due to the use of Coronavirus Relief Funds for law enforcement contract costs.

Ending the Fiscal Year: The city will likely finish the year with an approximate $34.5 million in budget surplus in the General Fund. These funds have already been commited by City Council for the City’s Civic Center project. Similarly, the Fire Fund will complete the year with a $1.5 million budget surplus.

Fund Balance: The city will complete the year with $96.4 million in fund balance in the General Fund . A litle over $14.0 million is set aside as an assigned reserve for opera�ons. A total of $73.4 million has been commited by the City Council for the Civic Center project and other opera�onal reserves. The remaining $8. 8 million of un assigned fund balance is available to cover nega�ve fund balances in other funds. The Fire Fure will finish the fiscal year with $14.5 million in fund balance. An assigned reserve of $4.8 million is set aside for opera�o ns, an addi�onal $8.0 is commited for the future third fire sta�on, and $400,000 is commited as an equipment replacement reserve. This leaves $1.2 million of unassigned fund balance.

Sales Tax Monitoring: The Finance department con�nues to monitor revenues closely, par�cularly sales tax. A true- up payment applicable to quarter 2 ending December 31, 2020, of the prior fiscal year , has not yet been received.

HdL originally believed the true up would be received in the 2021-22 fiscal year, however the payment did not materialize in the fiscal year and will be received a�er June 30, 2022. The true-up was budgeted at $8.0 million. As a result, sales tax receipts at $44.7 million totaled significantly less than the budgeted figure of $52.0 million. More detail is available in the atachments “General Fund Opera�ng Summary” and “Sales Tax Quarterly Summary.” Appropria�ons Limit: A summary report , “Appropria�ons Limit Summary ,” is included in this report . The city exceeded the state mandated Appropria�ons Limit for fiscal year 2020-21 and 2021-22. The summary report details the city’s limit and revenues subject to appropria�ons and provides trend data for the last three fiscal years. The city will con�nue to address the appropria�ons limit implica�ons during the mid-year and budget processes.

American Rescue Plan Act Funds: The city received approximately $7.36 million in American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF). These funds will be like the CARES CRF funds and will be subject to a federal single audit . Addi�onally, funds must be expensed by December 31, 2024. Final guidance and alloca�on informa�on was released by the Federal Department of Treasury in January 2022. The final guidance provided a $10.0 million standard deduc�on that all municipali�es may use towards revenue loss during the pandemic. City Council iden�fied approximately $4.1 million of SLFRF funds to use towards law enforcement contract costs during the mid- year process. Staff recommends u�lizing the full $10.0 million standard deduc�on for revenue loss in order to u�lize the city’s full $7.36 million alloca�on towards law enforcement contract costs. This interim report includes appropria�ng the transfer-out budget in the ARPA fund and the transfer-in budget in the General Fund to reflect the reimbursement for law enforcement contract costs . The budget surplus due to the reimbursement in the General Fund may be expensed or commited at the Council’s discre�on. These funds are subject to Federal Single Audit 397
Executive Summary
City of Eastvale UNAUDITED
Fiscal Year 2021-22
Interim Financial Report | QUARTER FOUR ending June 30, 2022 | 12 months, 98% Reported

City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 2 requirements; however, at this �me the US Treasury is allowing the subs�tu�on of an Alterna�ve Compliance Examina�on Engagement Report which the city’s auditors will complete.

This report does not include projections and only focuses on the City’s performance in comparison to budgeted estimates.

Attached Detail Reports

General Fund Summary by Category General Fund Summary by Department General Fund Opera�ng Summary
City-Wide Fund Balances
Sales Tax Quarterly Summary
Other Funds Revenue and Expenditure Summary
Assigned Reserve, Con�ngency Calcula�on
Appropria�ons Limit Summary
Accounting Methods
The figures presented in this execu�ve summary and the atached reports reflect general ledger balances as of June 30, 2022. Approximately 98% of the year has been reported. The city u�lizes an accrual basis of accoun�ng for all governmental funds, as requ ired by the Generally Accepted Accoun�ng Standards (GAAP). To comply with GAAP, staff accrues revenues received and expenditures occurring in the months of July and August back to the month of June. This matches the transac�on to the period in which revenue was earned or the expenditure occurred. Although June 30, 2022, has passed the City’s fin ancials have not yet been audited and finalized. The figures in this report represent the audited figures for June 30, 2021, and the Finance Department’s best es�mate of revenues and expenditures for June 30, 2022, as of the published date of this report.

GENERAL FUND OBSERVATIONS
The city’s General Fund is the largest and most flexible of the city’s funds as it contains all unrestricted revenues and provides the most discre�on for expenditures. Major General Fund revenue sources include sales tax, property tax, franchise fees, permit fees, and intergovernmental. The General Fund holds the majority of services provided to the community including police services, community development, and general government. The General Fund Overview table provides budgeted revenues and expenditures in addi�on to actual revenues and expenditures. The percentage reflects the percentage of budget u�lized.

Balanced Budge�ng – Per the c ity’s adopted
Budget Policy, the total appropria�ons shall not
exceed the total of es�mated revenu es. In the
adopted fiscal year 202 1-22 budget, total
General Fund expenditure appropria�ons did not
exceed revenues and the budget surplus totaled
$801,892. Since the budget was adopted several
expenditure and revenue budget appropria�ons
have been approved by Council; these
appropria�ons incre
ased the budget surplus to
$39.2 million as of the publish date of this report.

To date the General Fund’s actual budget surplus
is $34.5 million. Details of the city’s opera�ng
statement can be found in the Atachment
General Fund Opera�ng Summary.

General Fund Overview
12-Months Ended June 30, 2022
General Fund
Overview
Adjusted
Budget
Actual
Ac�vity
%
Revenues 75,382,279 67,953,770 90%
Expenditures 36,133,217 33,447,207 93%
Surplus (Deficit) 39,249,062 34,506,563
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 70
80 2019-20 Actuals 2020-21 Actuals 2021-22 Budget 2021-22 Actuals To-Date
Millions
Year-by-Year Revenue and Expenditures
Revenue
Expenditure
398
Executive Summary
City of Eastvale UNAUDITED
Fiscal Year 2021-22
Interim Financial Report | QUARTER FOUR ending June 30, 2022 | 12 months, 98% Reported

City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 3 Net Revenue/Change in Fund Balance - The General Fund will complete the fiscal year with $34.5 million in net revenue, also called a budget surplus (revenue minus expenditures), for the fiscal year 2021 -22. These funds have been allocated towards capital infrastructure reserves, these reserves were iden�fied during the 2021 -22 budget process and adopted by council via resolu�on.

It should be noted that the Fire Fund also consists of General Fund revenues, however due to agreements with Riverside County the fund is separated as an other-purpose general fund for budgeting purposes. The Fire Fund is collapsed into the General Fund on the city’s financial statements. Fire Fund information is in the section following the General Fund in this report.

GENERAL FUND REVENUES
As a general note, not all revenues are received monthly including sales tax, property tax, and franchise fees. The State of California provides sales tax es�mated advance installments monthly and issues the city a quarterly true-up a�er the State receives quarterly tax returns from businesses. A majority of property tax is typically received solely in the second half of the fiscal year and as a result, a por�on of property tax revenues have not yet been received for the fiscal year. Franchise fees are received quarterly.

Overall revenues stand at 90% of budget due solely to the missing $8.0 million sales tax true up payment for fiscal year 2020. At this �me, it is unknown when the state will distribute the funds. One last item not reflected in this report is a property tax teeter payment from Riverside County that staff es�mates is approximately $100,000. This will be reflected in the city’s financial statements.

Overall, General Fund revenues are at $67,953,770.

Detail of Specific Revenue Categories
Sales Tax – Sales tax revenues are highly indica�ve of
economic circumstances. The city u�lizes HdL
Companies for sales tax analysis . As of the mid -year
budget review, b udget currently stands at $ 52.0
million, an increase over the original $11.7 million. This is a projected 444% increase over the adopted sales tax budget, due to a local business’s change in their
business model. Currently, actuals are lower than
expected at 86% of budget, or $7.3 million under
budget. This is primarily due to an outstanding $8.0
million true up due from the state for the quarter two
repor�ng period for the 2020 fiscal year. The true -up will not be received in the 2021-22 fiscal year.

Property Tax – Property tax revenues are based solely
on the valua�on of property, both secured and unsecured, within the city. Secured property is property including land and buildings; unsecured property includes equipment and machinery. Property tax revenues are typically received in the second half of the fiscal year. Actual revenues are at $6,662,139 or 106% of budget.

Franchise Fees – This category is comprised of regular recurring revenues from solid waste collec�on, cable u�li�es, electric u�li�es, and natural gas u�li�es. Franchise fees came in higher than expected at 120% of budget. Three of the four categories of franchise fees materialized higher than budget, including electric, refuse, and natural gas.

Licenses, Fees, and Permits – This category is comprised of construc�on, fire, planning, and building permits and fees, and rental registra�on. Overall, this category is at $2,333,526 or 82% of budget. Contracted services and employee wages drive the fees charged to private developers for planning and building fees. Within the category, specific divisions and types of 399
Executive Summary
City of Eastvale UNAUDITED
Fiscal Year 2021-22
Interim Financial Report | QUARTER FOUR ending June 30, 2022 | 12 months, 98% Reported

City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 4 fees performed differently during the fiscal year. Building, planning, and engineering developer fees are down significantly; budget is only at 90 %, 74 %, and 73% respec�vely. Building fixed fees are at 129% of budget and encroachment development fees are on target at 98%. Legal fees exceeded budget at 167%. Passport services also exceed budget projec�ons at 139%; passport service demand increased significantly during the pandemic and has con�nued at or above the same level. Business registra�on fees are lower than expected at 72% of budget; data shows a drop in home occupancy businesses, likely from the pandemic.

Intergovernmental – This category is populated by the Vehicle License in Lieu fees ( VLF). VLF revenues are typically received in the last six months of the fiscal year, 50% within quarter three and the final 50% in quarter 4 . As a result, actuals stand at $6,367,511 or 104% of budget.

Use of Money and Property – This category is populated investment income. Budget was es�mated at $500,000 and actuals are at 151,235. This is due to a Government Accoun�ng Standards Board (GASB) required accoun�ng entry from the prior year that recognizes the difference in the book and market value of investments, known as unrealized gain or loss. Net of unrealized gain, total investment earnings for the fiscal year stand at $546,363, or 109% of budget.

Transfers In – This category stands at 7,417,458 or 97% of budget . The category consists of transfers -in to the General Fund from other funds. Transfers includes the $57,239 for the city’s cost alloca�on plan and $7,360,219 for an American Rescue Plan Act State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (ARPA SFLRF) reimbursement for Law Enforcement contract costs.

Overall, General Fund revenues are at $67,953,770 or 90% of budget.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT MAJOR REVENUE SOURCES
Detail Information on General Fund Sales and Property Tax Revenue Categories Sales Tax: Sales tax is the number one revenue source for the General Fund. For every dollar of sales tax paid, only $0.13 is received by the City of Eastvale. The other $0.87 goes to the State General Fund ($0.51), the State Local Revenue Fund ($0.14), Riverside County Transporta�on
Commission ($0.06), a State Local Revenue Fund specific to local health and social services programs ($0.06), State Local Public Safety Fund ($0.06), and the Riverside County
Transporta�on Fund ($0.03). For more informa�on on what agencies receive sales tax revenue go to:
www.cd�a.ca.gov/taxes-and-fees/sut-rates-descrip�on.htm

$0.51 State
General Fund
$0.14 State Local
Revenue Fund
$0.13 EASTVALE
$0.06 RIVCO RCTC
$0.06 State Local Rev
$0.06 State Local Safety
$0.03 RIVCO Transporta�on
For every $1 of paid sales tax, only
13 cents come back to the city.

The remainder is spread among
State and County agencies.
400
Executive Summary
City of Eastvale UNAUDITED
Fiscal Year 2021-22
Interim Financial Report | QUARTER FOUR ending June 30, 2022 | 12 months, 98% Reported

City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 5 Property Tax: Property tax is the number four largest revenue source f or the city’s General Fund and is the number one revenue source for the city’s Fire Fund. However, like sales tax every dollar of base property tax that a property owner pays only $0.02 is received by the city’s General Fund; another $0.06 is received by the city’s Fire Fund. Over $0.51 goes towards educa�on to the Corona Norco Unified School district, Riverside
Community College, and Ri verside County Office of
Educa�on. Riverside County receives $0.29. The
remaining $0.04 goes to several special districts and
flood control administra�on. The property tax revenues
received by the Fire Fund are restricted to Fire Services expenditures.

This breakdown of costs is only for the base property
tax rate. Many Eastvale residents also pay levies for
special assessments, including special financing
districts, such as landscape ligh�ng maintenance
districts and community facility district s. For mo re
informa�on about special financing districts in Eastvale go to: www.eastvaleca.gov/government/ finance -
department/special-financing-districts

GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES
A comparison of the adjusted budget to actual expenditures provides an overview of how actual expenditures compare to the city’s budget. Overall, actual expenditures are at $33,447,207 or 93% of budget.

Detail of Specific Expenditure Categories
Contract Services – This category is the largest category and includes law enforcement and contracted services for building and safety, planning, and public works. Currently, actual expenditures for the total contract category are $ 13,900,765 or 91% of budget; total budget for this category is $ 15.3 million. The largest expenditure within this category is the Law Enforcement contract with Riverside County Sheriff ; budget for law enforcement totals $ 12.3 million. This category is expected to have significant savings this fiscal year, as the city will be u�lizing the full alloca�on of its APRA SLFRF appor�onment to reimburse the General Fund for law
enforcement contract costs totaling $7.36 million. This contribu�on will be one -�me in nature as the city does not expect to con�nue to be able to offset contract costs into the future. Other major contracts in this category are animal control, crossing guards, legal services , and support services for all major departments.

Personnel – The personnel category contains the salary and benefit costs for city employees. This category generated actual expenditures at $5,186,164 or 80% of budget. Staff expected to see savings in this category due to new posi�ons remaining vacant during recruitment during the fiscal year, including three building inspector posi�ons that remained vacant for the en�re fiscal year. The savings in building personnel will be u�lized to offset the contract services overage in building due to the need to contract for inspec�on services while the posi�ons remained vacant.

Contract
Services
42%
Transfers
Out 19%
Personnel
18%
Operations
12%
Debt Service
8%
Maintenance
1%
Capital
Outlay 1%
Expenditure Budget Breakdown
401
Executive Summary
City of Eastvale UNAUDITED
Fiscal Year 2021-22
Interim Financial Report | QUARTER FOUR ending June 30, 2022 | 12 months, 98% Reported

City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 6 Opera�ons – Opera�ons is a broad category including supplies, adver�sing, u�li�es, postage and shipping, and janitorial.

Actual expenditures in this category are at $3,191,127 or 75% of budget.

Capital Outlay – Capital outlay consists of office equipment, computer hardware, so�ware, furniture, and fixtures with a cost greater than $5,000. This category is at $187,826 or 72% of budget.

Debt Service – Debt service in the General Fund accounts for the sales tax abatement agreement with Goodman at the Sta�on on the north end of town and revenue neutrality owed to Riverside County. The City Council approved the full payoff of the agreement during the mid -year budget review ; the payoff totaled $2.6 million to Goodman for traffic infrastructure (streets, storm drains, streetlights, signing and striping, and signals) completed by the developer. The city paid off the agreement during the third quarter. The actual payoff amount of $1.8 million is considered a non -opera�ng cost. Revenue neutrality is another expenditure located in this category. It is based on es�mated tax revenue losses experienced by Riverside County as a result of the city’s incorpora�on, the obliga�on is paid to Riverside County through both the General Fund and the Fire Fund. The debt service category is at 110% of budget. Two factors affected the increase. The first is that the consumer price index (CPI) for Riverside County came ba ck higher than expected, causing the revenue neutrality payment to increase. Second, are expenditures related to the city’s Government Accoun�ng Standards Board (GASB) Statement 87 regarding the city’s leases. These expenditures are reclassified from op era�ons (leases) to debt service in accordance with GASB 87.

Transfers-Out – The transfers-out category in the General Fund accounts for the movement of cash from the General Fund to another fund. The city transferred out funds to the debt service fund and capital improvement fund to cover the costs of the full payoff of the city’s lease purchase agreement for streetlights and to cover the costs of capital improvement projects (CIP) that require General Fund resources. The streetlight payoff, totaling $3.8 million, and CIP transfers, totaling $2.1 million are considered non-opera�ng in nature. A total of $503,127 in regular recurring transfer expenditures includes cash to cover the city’s regular debt service payment for the lease purchase agreement and General Fund benefit contribu�ons for several Landscape and Ligh�ng Maintenance Districts and one Benefit Assessment District.

Overall, the General Fund is at $33,447,207 or 93% of expenditure budget.

GENERAL FUND OPERATING STATEMENT
General Fund Operating Statement - The General
Fund generated $28,199,687 in operating revenues
and $24,421,130 in operating expenditures. Revenues
exceed expenditures and as a result, the General Fund
has an operating surplus of $3,778,557. On the non -
operating side, $39,754,083 in non-operating revenues
and $9,026,077 in non -operating expenditures
occurred. Non -operating revenues exceed
expenditures and as a result, the General Fund has a
non-operating surplus of $30,728,006. Non-operating revenues are comprised of two sources of revenue, sales tax and transfers in from other funds. The sales tax revenue represents a local business in the business and industry category that changed business structure and as a result county pool sales tax was redistributed to host cities. At this time, staff considers this new sales tax source as one-time and non-recurring revenues as the stability of the revenue is unknown. As a result, the revenue will be set aside for future capital improvement projects, such as the city’s civic center development at the Leal Property. The transfers-in represent ARPA SLFRF funds utilized to offset law enforcement contract costs. Non- operating expenditures consist of unrealized losses on the city’s investments, totaling $1.3 million. This entry will be reversed as of July 1, 2022, and have no material impact to the city’s cash on hand, however the entry will be reflected on General Fund Operating Statement

Operating Revenue Actuals 28,199,687
Operating Expenditure Actuals (24,421,130)
Operating Surplus 3,778,557

Non-Operating Revenue Actuals 39,754,083
Non-Operating Expenditure Actuals (9,026,077)
Non-Operating Surplus 30,728,006

Net Revenue 34,506,563
402
Executive Summary
City of Eastvale UNAUDITED
Fiscal Year 2021-22
Interim Financial Report | QUARTER FOUR ending June 30, 2022 | 12 months, 98% Reported

City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 7 the city’s financial stat ements. Debt service and transfers out represent the remaining balance of $7.7 million and are described in more detail in the previous section.

FIRE FUND OBSERVATIONS
The city’s Fire Fund contains all revenues and expenditures related to the provision of fire services in the city. The Fire Fund is considered General Fund monies; however, it contains restricted property tax revenue for use towards fire services and therefore is separated from the city’s unrestricted General Fund.

Revenues – Major Fire Fund revenue sources include property tax, licenses, permits, and fees, and use of money and property. Property tax, like the General Fund is primarily received in the second half of the fiscal year. Property tax is currently at 104% of budget or $7,601,845. Property tax is the largest single source of revenue for the Fire Fund.

Licenses, permits, and fees are at 5 7 % of
budget, primarily due to a decrease in fire plan
check permits.

Investment income populates the category of
use of money and property. Budget was
es�mated at $9 5,000 and actuals are at
($1,616). This is due to a GASB required
accoun�ng entry from the prior year that
recognizes the difference in the book and
market value of investments. This entry causes
overall revenues in the Fire Fund to reflect a
lower value than the single category of property
tax receipts for the fund. Net of unrealized gain,
total investment earnings for the fiscal year
stand at $103,308, or 109% of budget.

Overall, Fire Fund revenues are at 102 % of
budget.

Expenditures – Contract services for Riverside County Fire stand at $ 5,654,282 or 91% of budget. The city realized a nominal savings due to CalFIRE’s current staffing shortage, which equated to salary savings within the city’s service contract.

Maintenance and opera�ons actuals are at 108% and 73% respec�vely. Maintenance and opera�ons include building maintenance, vehicle maintenance and fuel, and u�li�es. The city has hired a full- �me Landscape and Facili�es Superintendent, and as a result expenditures at the city’s fire facili�es will likely increase as regular maintenance is implemented.

Overall, the Fire Fund is at $6,217,798 or 90% of expenditure budget.

Net Revenue – The Fire Fund is projected to complete the fiscal year with $1,476,891 in net revenue, also called a budget surplus, for the fiscal year 2021-22.

Fire Fund Overview
12-Months Ended June 30, 2022
General Fund
Overview
Adjusted
Budget
Actual
Ac�vity
%
Revenues 7,571,931 7,682,866 101%
Expenditures 6,892,484 6,210,900 90%
Surplus (Deficit) 679,447 1,471,966
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
2019-20 Actuals 2020-21 Actuals 2021-22 Budget 2021-22 Actuals To-Date
Millions
Year-by-Year Revenue and Expenditures
Revenue Expenditure
403
Executive Summary
City of Eastvale UNAUDITED
Fiscal Year 2021-22
Interim Financial Report | QUARTER FOUR ending June 30, 2022 | 12 months, 98% Reported

City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 8

OTHER FUND OBSERVATIONS
The city’s other funds consist of special revenue funds and two funds solely consis�ng of General Fund contribu�ons, the Capital Projects Fund and the Debt Service Fund. These two funds were created in order to track capital projects funded by the General Fund and debt.

MAJOR SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
Gas Tax – This fund was considered a major fund for the 2020-21 financial audit. Fuel sales have increased in the city and statewide compared to the prior year, fuel taxes con�nue to be received at almost the same level compared to the prior fiscal year, revenue actuals are $ 1,604,905 or 93% of budget. This is a 12% increase over the prior year. Gas taxes are collected and allocated to local governments from the State of California pursuant to sec�on 2103 of the California Streets and Highways code. Appor�onments are based on the city’s popula�on, vehicle registra�ons, and maintained street miles.

Expenditures in this fund are restricted for use towards streets or roads. Expenditures in this fund are at 54% of budget for a total of $1,870,769. Capital improvement projects are u�lizing built up fund balance (savings) in this fund to cove r project costs that exceed current year revenues.

Grants: American Rescue Plan Act – This fund was considered a major fund for the 2020 -21 financial audit. As a result, staff included discussion here. As of June 30, 2022, the fund had a total of $7,3690,219 in expenditures in the category of transfers-out to the General Fund. As a result of the transfer-out expenditures this fund will have zero fund balance, as the grant funds have been completely expensed and the grant period has ended for the city.

A Note Regarding Government Accounting and Budgeting
Most agencies manage governmental funds and budgets using a method called “modified accrual” accoun�ng. Modified accrual means that governmental funds are managed on a cash basis throughout the year. At year-end accruals are processed to ensure revenues and ex penditures are recorded in the appropriate fiscal year in which the transac�ons actually occurred. This method applies to all the city’s funds (General Fund and Special Revenue funds).

As an illustra�on, revenue is recorded as it is received throughout the fiscal year (cash basis). The majority of General Fund revenues are received sporadically throughout the year, and most is received or accrued in the final nine months of the fiscal year. Meanwhile, expenditures con�nue each month, regardle ss of whether revenues have been received. This circumstance highlights the importance of maintaining an adequate opera�ng reserve that allows for cash flow needs throughout the fiscal year, especiall y during months in which some revenues categories are not received.

404
CITY OF EASTVALE UNAUDITED: 98% Reported
Fiscal Year 2021-22
Interim Financial Report | QUARTER FOUR ending June 30, 2022 | 12 months General Fund Summary by Category
Restated
Audited
Actuals
Restated
Audited
Actuals
Adjusted
Budget Actuals
Amount
Over(Under)
Budget
Description 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 6/30/2022 2021-22

GENERAL FUND
Revenues
Property Taxes 3,189,147$ 3,526,028$ 3,445,652$ 3,662,139$ 106% 216,487$ Sales & Use Tax 10,348,979 28,120,058 52,000,000 44,710,286 86% (7,289,714) Franchise Fees 1,644,840 5,937,579 1,647,000 1,971,912 120% 324,912 Property Transfer Tax - 0 0 0 0% - License, Permits & Fees 3,181,576 2,885,193 2,840,010 2,333,526 82% (506,484) Fines, Penalties & Forfeitures 647,721 583,856 490,000 567,641 116% 77,641 Intergovernmental 6,301,448 5,804,854 6,099,611 6,367,511 104% 267,900 Use of Money & Property 1,576,335 1,102,678 500,000 151,235 30% (348,765) Miscellaneous 488,523 237,295 716,500 772,062 108% 55,562 Transfers In 631,506 17,886 7,643,506 7,417,458 97% (226,048) Total General Fund Revenues 28,010,076 48,215,427 75,382,279 67,953,770 90% (7,428,509) Expenditures
Salaries 2,319,254$ 2,642,258$ 4,882,410$ 3,827,275$ 78% (1,055,135)$ Benefits 839,191 1,081,972 1,611,200 1,358,889 84% (252,311) Contract Services 12,590,458 12,106,951 15,302,798 13,900,765 91% (1,402,033) Maintenance 145,799 105,619 256,146 205,290 80% (50,857) Operations 3,202,635 2,644,003 4,253,050 4,496,202 106% 243,152 Capital Outlay 958,270 242,536 260,394 187,826 72% (72,568) Debt Service 1,314,367 1,130,459 2,816,550 3,105,881 110% 289,331 Transfers Out 1,381,239 1,989,214 6,750,668 6,365,079 94% (385,589) Total General Fund Expenditures 22,751,213 21,943,011 36,133,217 33,447,207 93% (2,686,010) NET REVENUE 5,258,863 26,272,415 39,249,062 34,506,563 (4,742,499)

OTHER PURPOSE GENERAL FUNDS

RESTRICTED STRUCTURAL FIRE FUND
Revenues
Property Taxes (Restricted for Fire Services) 6,767,148$ 7,289,292$ 7,298,931$ 7,601,854$ 104% 302,923$ Sales & Use Tax - 0 0 0 0 -
Franchise Fees - 0 0 0 0 -
Other Taxes - 0 0 0 0 -
License, Permits & Fees 208,613 154,718 165,000 94,451 57% (70,549) Fines, Penalties & Forfeitures 13,008 25,979 13,000 0 0% (13,000) Intergovernmental - 0 0 0 0 -
Use of Money & Property 498,969 2,927 95,000 (1,616) -2% (96,616) Miscellaneous 24,932 0 0 0 0 -
Transfers - 167,660 0 0 0 -
Total Fire Fund Revenues 7,512,670 7,640,575 7,571,931 7,694,689 102% 122,758 Expenditures
Salaries -$ 797$ -$ 808$ 0 808$ Benefits - 107 0 0 0 -
Contract Services 4,121,443 5,463,946 6,213,787 5,654,282 91% (559,505) Maintenance 22,295 52,275 52,364 56,463 108% 4,100 Operations 111,064 78,136 283,834 205,816 73% (78,017) Capital Outlay - 0 85,000 38,200 45% (46,800) Debt Service 481,929 252,432 257,500 262,228 102% 4,728 Transfers Out - 0 0 0 0 -
Total General Fund Expenditures 4,736,731 5,847,693 6,892,484 6,217,798 90% (674,686) NET REVENUE 2,775,939 1,792,882 679,447 1,476,891 797,444 % Budget
Used
City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 405
CITY OF EASTVALE UNAUDITED: 98% Reported
Fiscal Year 2021-22
Interim Financial Report | QUARTER FOUR ending June 30, 2022 | 12 months General Fund Summary by Departments
Restated
Audited Actuals
Restated
Audited Actuals
Adjusted
Budget Actuals
Amount
Over(Under)
Budget
Description 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 6/30/2022 2021-22

GENERAL FUND
Revenues
General Services
Non Departmental 24,239,003$ 44,774,936$ 72,101,269$ 65,076,959$ 90% (7,024,310)$ City Clerk 23,470 42,702 41,000 54,411 133% 13,411 City Manager 100 6,056 6,000 10,258 171% 4,258 Finance 90,477 160,501 176,650 126,297 71% (50,353) General Government - - - - 0% - City Attorney - 23,730 48,000 80,205 167% 32,205 Subtotal General Services 24,353,051 45,007,925 72,372,919 65,348,130 90% (7,024,789) Community Development
Community Development 639,184$ 418,610$ 1,441,360$ 1,064,186$ 74% (377,174)$ Subtotal Community Development 639,184 418,610 1,441,360 1,064,186 74% (377,174) Community Safety
Community Safety 2,241,189$ 2,154,008$ 1,003,500$ 905,318$ 90% (98,182)$ Subtotal Community Safety 2,241,189 2,154,008 1,003,500 905,318 90% (98,182) Public Safety
Public Safety 776,652$ 634,885$ 564,500$ 636,137$ 113% 71,637$ Subtotal Public Safety 776,652 634,885 564,500 636,137 113% 71,637 Total General Fund Revenues 28,010,076 48,215,427 75,382,279 67,953,770 90% (7,428,509) Expenditures
General Services
100 City Council 109,272$ 133,393$ 215,695$ 224,419$ 104% 8,723$ 110 City Attorney 307,082 299,975 390,000 317,860 82% (72,140) 120 City Clerk 419,335 420,701 532,926 444,667 83% (88,259) 200 City Manager 699,087 613,963 719,406 609,470 85% (109,936) 210 Finance 710,728 708,666 1,146,785 910,324 79% (236,461) 220 Talent Attraction and Development 408,992 485,963 640,266 651,178 102% 10,912 230 Risk Management 110,922 164,653 439,460 386,678 88% (52,782) 240 Information Technology 252,352 411,918 281,012 294,454 105% 13,442 260 Communications 243,744 253,125 351,246 244,365 70% (106,882) 290 General Government 2,764,206 3,535,350 10,274,472 11,162,226 109% 887,754 295 Building Maintenance 825,546 357,011 572,937 467,728 82% (105,209) 720 Events - 0 664,359 682,857 103% 18,498 Subtotal General Services 6,851,265 7,384,719 16,228,564 16,396,225 101% 167,661 Community Development
301 Administration 521,072$ 562,236$ 1,316,378$ 1,108,869$ 84% (207,509)$ 300 Planning 751,172 541,489 812,907 610,794 75% (202,113) 320 Engineering 241,479 504,724 1,832,019 1,447,314 79% (384,705) 500 Public Works 1,064,871 415,523 736,293 368,711 50% (367,582) 600 Landscaping - 0 0 1,074 0% 1,074 Subtotal Community Development 2,578,593 2,023,972 4,697,597 3,536,763 75% (1,160,834) Community Safety
311 Administration -$ -$ 291,086$ 19,679$ 7% (271,408)$ 310 Building Safety 2,277,358 2,122,378 1,242,509 1,337,997 108% 95,487 330 Community Enhancement & Safety 862,700 663,285 983,621 764,036 78% (219,586) Subtotal Community Safety 3,140,058 2,785,663 2,517,217 2,121,711 84% (395,506) % Budget
Used
City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 406
CITY OF EASTVALE UNAUDITED: 98% Reported
Fiscal Year 2021-22
Interim Financial Report | QUARTER FOUR ending June 30, 2022 | 12 months General Fund Summary by Departments
Restated
Audited Actuals
Restated
Audited Actuals
Adjusted
Budget Actuals
Amount
Over(Under)
Budget
Description 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 6/30/2022 2021-22
% Budget
Used
Public Safety
400 Law Enforcement 9,844,040$ 9,557,446$ 12,302,638$ 11,063,140$ 90% (1,239,498)$ 430 Animal Control 279,592 167,648 290,000 233,268 80% (56,732) 440 Crossing Guards 57,664 23,563 97,200 96,099 99% (1,101) Subtotal Public Safety 10,181,297 9,748,658 12,689,838 11,392,506 90% (1,297,332) Total General Fund Expenditures 22,751,213 21,943,011 36,133,217 33,447,207 93% (2,686,010) TOTAL NET REVENUE 5,258,863 26,272,415 39,249,062 34,506,563 (4,742,499)

OTHER PURPOSE GENERAL FUNDS

RESTRICTED STRUCTURAL FIRE FUND
Revenues
Property Taxes (Restricted for Fire Serv 6,767,148$ 7,289,292$ 7,298,931$ 7,601,854$ 104% 302,923$ Sales & Use Tax - - - - 0 - Franchise Fees - - - - 0 - Other Taxes - - - - 0 - License, Permits & Fees 208,613 154,718 165,000 94,451 57% (70,549) Fines, Penalties & Forfeitures 13,008 25,979 13,000 - 0% (13,000) Intergovernmental - - - - 0 - Use of Money & Property 498,969 2,927 95,000 (1,616) -2% (96,616) Miscellaneous 24,932 - - - 0 - Transfers - 167,660 - - 0 - Total Fire Fund Revenues 7,512,670 7,640,575 7,571,931 7,694,689 102% 122,758 Expenditures
Public Safety
290 General Government 249,111$ 253,044$ 257,500$ 262,228$ 102% 4,728$ 295 Building Maintenance - 15,032 196,747 184,581 94% (12,166) 320 Engineering - 256 0 808 0% 808 420 Fire Services 6,094,096 5,579,360 6,438,238 5,770,182 90% (668,056) Total Fire Fund Expenditures 6,343,207 5,847,693 6,892,484 6,217,798 90% (674,686) TOTAL FIRE FUND NET REVENUE 1,169,463 1,792,882 679,447 1,476,891 797,444 City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 407
CITY OF EASTVALE UNAUDITED: 98% Reported
Fiscal Year 2021-22
Interim Financial Report | QUARTER FOUR ending June 30, 2022 | 12 months General Fund Operating Summary
Restated
Audited
Actuals
Restated
Audited Actuals
Adjusted
Budget Actuals
Amount
Over(Under)
Budget
Description 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 6/30/2022 2021-22

GENERAL FUND
Operating Revenues
Property Taxes 3,189,147$ 3,526,028$ 3,445,652$ 3,662,139$ 106% 216,487$ Sales & Use Tax 10,348,979 11,620,058 11,700,000 11,910,286 102% 210,286 Franchise Fees 1,644,840 $1,937,579 1,647,000 1,971,912 120% 324,912 Property Transfer Tax - - 0 - 0% - License, Permits & Fees 3,181,576 2,885,193 2,840,010 2,333,526 82% (506,484) Fines, Penalties & Forfeitures 647,721 583,856 490,000 567,641 116% 77,641 Intergovernmental 6,301,448 5,804,854 6,099,611 6,367,511 104% 267,900 Use of Money & Property 1,576,335 1,864,309 500,000 557,371 111% 57,371 Miscellaneous 488,523 (719,323) 716,500 772,062 108% 55,562 Transfers In 631,506 17,886 283,287 57,239 20% (226,048) Total General Fund Operating Revenues 28,010,076 27,520,440 27,722,060 28,199,687 102% 477,627 Operating Expenditures
Salaries 2,319,254$ 2,642,258$ 4,882,410$ 3,827,275$ 78% (1,055,135)$ Benefits 839,191 1,081,972 1,611,200 1,358,889 84% (252,311) Staff Development - - 0 - 0% - Contract Services 12,590,458 12,106,951 15,302,798 13,900,765 91% (1,402,033) Maintenance 145,799 105,619 256,146 205,290 80% (50,857) Operations 3,202,635 2,644,003 4,253,050 3,191,127 75% (1,061,923) Capital Outlay 958,270 (714,082) 260,394 187,826 72% (72,568) Debt Service 1,314,367 1,130,459 957,500 1,246,831 130% 289,331 Transfers Out 468,699 466,884 602,564 503,127 83% (99,437) Total General Fund Expenditures 21,838,673 19,464,063 28,126,063 24,421,130 87% (3,704,933) NET OPERATING REVENUE 6,171,403 8,056,376 (404,003) 3,778,557 Non-Operating Revenues
Franchise Fees (Retention Fees) -$ $4,000,000 -$ -$ 0% -$ Sales Tax - 16,500,000 40,300,000 32,800,000 81% (7,500,000) Miscellaneous GASB 87 - 956,618 - - 0% - Use of Money and Property (Unrealized Gain) - (761,631) - (406,136) 0% (406,136) Transfers In (ARPA SLFRF) - - 7,360,219 7,360,219 100% - Total General Fund Non-Operating Revenues - $20,694,987 47,660,219 39,754,083 83% (7,906,136) Non-Operating Expenditures
Operations (Unrealized Loss) -$ -$ -$ 1,305,075$ 0% 1,305,075$ Capital Outlay (GASB 87) - 956,618 - - 0% - Debt Service (Tarpon Properties Payoff) - - 1,859,050 1,859,050 100% - Transfers Out (Streetlight Payoff) - 2,330 4,197,585 3,808,933 91% (388,652) Transfers Out (CIP) 912,540 1,520,000 1,950,519 2,053,019 105% 102,500 Total General Fund Non-Operating Expenditures 912,540 2,478,948 8,007,154 9,026,077 113% 1,018,923 NET NON-OPERATING REVENUE (912,540) 18,216,039 39,653,065 30,728,006 %
Budget
Used
City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 408
CITY OF EASTVALE UNAUDITED: 98% Reported
Fiscal Year 2021-22
Interim Financial Report | QUARTER FOUR ending June 30, 2022 | 12 months General Fund Operating Summary
Restated
Audited
Actuals
Restated
Audited Actuals
Adjusted
Budget Actuals
Amount
Over(Under)
Budget
Description 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 6/30/2022 2021-22
%
Budget
Used

OTHER PURPOSE GENERAL FUNDS

RESTRICTED STRUCTURAL FIRE FUND
Operating Revenues
Property Taxes (Restricted for Fire Services) 6,767,148$ 7,289,292$ 7,298,931$ 7,601,854$ 104% 302,923$ Sales & Use Tax - 0 0 0 0% -
Franchise Fees - 0 0 0 0% -
Other Taxes - 0 0 0 0% -
License, Permits & Fees 208,613 154,718 165,000 94,451 57% (70,549) Fines, Penalties & Forfeitures 13,008 25,979 13,000 0 0% (13,000) Intergovernmental - 0 0 0 0% -
Use of Money & Property 498,969 2,927 95,000 (1,616) -2% (96,616) Miscellaneous 24,932 0 0 0 0% -
Transfers - 167,660 0 0 0% -
Total Fire Fund Revenues 7,512,670 7,640,575 7,571,931 7,694,689 102% 122,758 Operating Expenditures
Salaries -$ 797$ -$ 808$ 0% 808$ Benefits - 107 0 0 0% -
Staff Development - 0 0 0 0% -
Contract Services 5,795,290 5,463,946 6,213,787 5,654,282 91% (559,505) Maintenance 191,629 52,275 52,364 56,463 108% 4,100 Operations 77,374 78,136 283,834 205,816 73% (78,017) Capital Outlay 29,687 0 85,000 38,200 45% (46,800) Debt Service 249,111 252,432 257,500 262,228 102% 4,728 Transfers Out 115 0 0 0 0% -
Subtotal General Fund Expenditures 6,343,207 5,847,693 6,892,484 6,217,798 90% (674,686) NET OPERATING REVENUE 1,169,463 1,792,882 679,447 1,476,891 City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 409
CITY OF EASTVALE UNAUDITED: 98% Reported
Fiscal Year 2021-22
Interim Financial Report | QUARTER FOUR ending June 30, 2022 | 12 months Other Funds Summary
*Data includes transfers Restated
Audited
Actuals
Restated
Audited
Actuals
Adjusted
Budget Actuals
Amount
Over(Under)
Budget
Description 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 6/30/2022 2021-22

OTHER FUNDS
Revenues
200 Gas Tax 3,353,491$ 1,437,826$ 1,730,150$ 1,604,905$ 93% (125,245)$ 205 SB1 1,179,586 1,228,573 1,299,400 1,378,406 106% 79,006 206 Area Drainage Plan (ADP) 906,050 (2,060) 8,000 (493) -6% (8,493) 210 Measure A 1,564,879 1,834,932 1,507,000 2,007,954 133% 500,954 211 TDA Fund - - 432,500 - 0% (432,500) 220 AQMD 111,388 91,756 150,865 143,575 95% (7,290) 230 Grants: Law Enforcement Grants - - - - 0% - 240 Grants: Miscellaneous Grants Fund 819,960 390,183 2,679,750 668,027 25% (2,011,723) 241 Grants: Coronavirus Relief Fund 31,197 788,813 - - 0% - 242 Grants: American Rescue Plan Act Fund - - 3,680,110 7,360,219 200% 3,680,110 243 Public, Educational, or Governmental Access Fund - 515 500 2,188 438% 1,688 250 Grants: Community Development Block Grant 198,827 - 165,000 - 0% (165,000) 260 Local Law Enforcement Services 156,652 157,695 120,000 165,428 138% 45,428 270 TUMF Reimbursement Fund 1,557,603 - - - 0% - 290 Transportation DIF 229,580 115,440 192,500 119,761 62% (72,739) 291 Fire DIF 59,997 54,388 76,000 46,690 61% (29,310) 292 Public Facilities DIF 705,484 397,553 551,500 102,648 19% (448,852) 293 Road and Bridge Benefit District 491,919 84,487 80,000 (3,525) -4% (83,525) 300 LLMD 89-1 Zone 10 3,070 3,188 3,820 3,820 100% (0) 301 LLMD 89-1 Zone 33 5,924 (21,661) 2,670 1,171 44% (1,499) 302 LLMD 89-1 Zone 41 200,281 188,123 188,248 171,435 91% (16,813) 303 LLMD 89-1 Zone 79 3,299 2,367 2,750 2,593 94% (157) 304 LLMD 89-1 Zone 85 1,101 1,091 3,110 3,008 97% (102) 305 LLMD 89-1 Zone 111 26,109 25,513 26,070 23,997 92% (2,073) 306 LLMD 89-1 Zone 115 4,510 2,807 3,720 3,726 100% 6 307 LLMD 89-1 Zone 116 8,868 8,553 8,933 8,031 90% (902) 308 LLMD 89-1 Zone 147 972 198 1,553 1,552 100% (1) 309 LLMD 89-1 Zone 151 6,143 6,393 7,660 7,659 100% (1) 310 LLMD 89-1 Zone 156 4,687 4,722 5,750 5,750 100% (0) 311 Benefit Assessment District 2014-2 4,706 4,776 12,494 12,563 101% 69 312 LLMD 2014-1 3,892 3,781 19,406 4,645 24% (14,761) 313 LLMD 2014-3 3,255 3,313 8,370 4,016 48% (4,354) 314 LLMD 2014-4 2,009 2,078 6,920 2,377 34% (4,543) 315 Community Facilities District 2019-1 6,575 9,284 6,000 10,162 169% 4,162 400 Community Facilities District 2017-1 70,975 73,612 34,400 74,687 217% 40,287 401 Community Facilities District 2017-2 18,193 33,308 17,700 43,192 244% 25,492 402 Community Facilities District 2020-1 - 72,863 36,100 73,900 205% 37,800 403 LMD 98-2 ORIGINAL - - - 16,614 0% 16,614 404 LMD 98-2 ANNEX 01/Zone A - - - 2,006 0% 2,006 405 LMD 98-2 ANNEX 02/Zone B - - - 41,892 0% 41,892 406 LMD 98-2 ANNEX 03/Zone C - - - 4,299 0% 4,299 407 LMD 98-2 ANNEX 04/Zone D - - - 6,233 0% 6,233 408 LMD 98-2 ANNEX 06/Zone F - - - 29,479 0% 29,479 409 LMD 2001-1 Zone G - - - 1,860 0% 1,860 410 LMD 2001-1 Zone S - - - 2,418 0% 2,418 411 LMD 2001-1 Zone W - - - 20,319 0% 20,319 412 LMD 2001-2 Zone A - - - 49,084 0% 49,084 413 LMD 2001-2 Zone B - - - 26,323 0% 26,323 414 LMD 2001-2 Zone C - - - 1,422 0% 1,422 415 LMD 2001-2 Zone D - - - 17,281 0% 17,281 % Budget
Used
City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 410
CITY OF EASTVALE UNAUDITED: 98% Reported
Fiscal Year 2021-22
Interim Financial Report | QUARTER FOUR ending June 30, 2022 | 12 months Other Funds Summary
*Data includes transfers Restated
Audited
Actuals
Restated
Audited
Actuals
Adjusted
Budget Actuals
Amount
Over(Under)
Budget
Description 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 6/30/2022 2021-22
% Budget
Used
416 LMD 2001-2 Zone F - - - 3,124 0% 3,124 417 LMD 2001-2 Zone G - - - 26,451 0% 26,451 418 LMD 2001-2 Zone H - - - 39,841 0% 39,841 419 LMD 2001-2 Zone J - - - 27,339 0% 27,339 420 LMD 2001-2 Zone K - 0 - 1,953 0% 1,953 421 LMD 2001-2 Zone M - - - 2,313 0% 2,313 422 LMD 2001-3 Zone A - - - 3,901 0% 3,901 423 LMD 2001-3 Zone B - - - 3,372 0% 3,372 424 LMD 2001-3 Zone C - - - 22,447 0% 22,447 425 LMD 2001-3 Zone D - - - 45,651 0% 45,651 426 LMD 2001-3 Zone E - - - 100,068 0% 100,068 427 LMD 2001-3 Zone F - - - 38,146 0% 38,146 428 LMD 2001-3 Zone G - - - 3,433 0% 3,433 429 LMD 2001-3 Zone H - - - 15,431 0% 15,431 430 LMD 2001-3 Zone I - (0) - 61,636 0% 61,636 431 LMD 2001-3 Zone J - - - 17,621 0% 17,621 432 LMD 2001-3 Zone K - - - 17,999 0% 17,999 433 LMD 2001-3 Zone L - - - 19,033 0% 19,033 434 LMD 2001-3 Zone M - - - 55,732 0% 55,732 435 LMD 2001-3 Zone N - - - 40,754 0% 40,754 436 LMD 2001-3 Zone O - - - 6,567 0% 6,567 437 LMD 2001-3 Zone P - - - 38,444 0% 38,444 438 LMD 2001-3 Zone Q - - - 15,384 0% 15,384 439 LMD 2001-3 Zone R - - - 1,847 0% 1,847 440 LMD 2001-3 Zone S - 0 - 7,420 0% 7,420 441 LMD 2001-3 Zone T - - - 56,935 0% 56,935 442 LMD 2001-3 Zone U - - - 37,518 0% 37,518 443 LMD 2001-3 Zone V - - - 63,250 0% 63,250 444 LMD 2001-3 Zone W - - - 19,436 0% 19,436 445 LMD 2001-3 Zone X - - - 5,511 0% 5,511 446 LMD 2001-3 Zone Y - - - 9,199 0% 9,199 447 LMD 2001-3 Zone Z - - - 10,172 0% 10,172 448 LMD 2001-3 Zone AA - - - 6,459 0% 6,459 449 LMD 2001-3 Zone BB - - - 5,998 0% 5,998 450 LMD 2001-3 Zone CC - - - 23,545 0% 23,545 451 LMD 2001-3 Zone DD - - - 50,804 0% 50,804 452 LMD 2001-3 Zone EE - - - 24,718 0% 24,718 453 LMD 2001-3 Zone FF - - - 30,352 0% 30,352 454 LMD 2001-3 Zone GG - - - 15,361 0% 15,361 455 LMD 2001-3 Zone HH - - - 12,318 0% 12,318 456 LMD 2001-3 Zone II - - - 27,610 0% 27,610 457 LMD 2001-3 Zone JJ - - - 4,936 0% 4,936 458 LMD 2001-3 Zone KK - - - 2,840 0% 2,840 459 LMD 2001-3 Zone LL - - - 10,706 0% 10,706 460 LMD 2001-3 Zone MM - - - 8,127 0% 8,127 461 LMD 2001-3 Zone NN - - - 19,058 0% 19,058 462 LMD 2001-3 Zone OO - - - 18,801 0% 18,801 463 LMD 2001-3 Zone PP - - - 22,117 0% 22,117 464 LMD 2001-3 Zone QQ - - - 8,646 0% 8,646 465 LMD 2001-3 Zone RR - - - 57,350 0% 57,350 466 LMD 2001-3 Zone SS - - - 21,352 0% 21,352 467 LMD 2001-3 Zone TT - - - 9,115 0% 9,115 468 LMD 2001-3 Zone UU - - - 7,013 0% 7,013 City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 411
CITY OF EASTVALE UNAUDITED: 98% Reported
Fiscal Year 2021-22
Interim Financial Report | QUARTER FOUR ending June 30, 2022 | 12 months Other Funds Summary
*Data includes transfers Restated
Audited
Actuals
Restated
Audited
Actuals
Adjusted
Budget Actuals
Amount
Over(Under)
Budget
Description 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 6/30/2022 2021-22
% Budget
Used
469 LMD 2001-3 Zone VV - - - 5,913 0% 5,913 470 LMD 2001-3 Zone WW - - - 24,557 0% 24,557 471 LMD 2001-3 Zone XX - - - 3,485 0% 3,485 472 LMD 2001-3 Zone YY - - - 27,198 0% 27,198 473 LMD 2001-3 Zone ZZ - - - 10,999 0% 10,999 474 LMD 2001-3 Zone AAA - - - 47,875 0% 47,875 475 LMD 2001-3 Zone BBB - - - 30,633 0% 30,633 476 LMD 2001-3 Zone CCC - - - 65,649 0% 65,649 477 LMD 2001-3 Zone DDD - - - 56,156 0% 56,156 478 LMD 2001-3 Zone EEE - - - 6,178 0% 6,178 479 LMD 2001-3 Zone FFF - - - 54,422 0% 54,422 480 LMD 2001-3 Zone GGG - - - 19,667 0% 19,667 481 LMD 2001-3 Zone HHH - - - 828 0% 828 482 LMD 2001-3 Zone III - - - 26,775 0% 26,775 483 LMD 2001-3 Zone JJJ - - - 31,039 0% 31,039 484 LMD 2001-3 Zone LLL - - - 6,082 0% 6,082 485 LMD 2001-3 Zone MMM - - - 20,021 0% 20,021 486 Illumination District No 2 Subarea 35 - - - 8,738 0% 8,738 487 Illumination District No 2 Subarea 42 - - - 2,511 0% 2,511 488 Illumination District No 2 Subarea 46 - - - 9,323 0% 9,323 489 Illumination District No 2 Subarea 49 - - - 11,825 0% 11,825 490 Illumination District No 2 Subarea 55 - - - 2,341 0% 2,341 500 Debt Service 468,699 468,699 4,277,633 4,277,633 100% - 600 Capital Projects 952,768 1,520,007 2,054,019 2,053,029 100% (990) 700 Information Technology - - 388,652 - 0% (388,652) Total Other Fund Revenues 13,162,651 8,993,118 19,789,253 22,281,330 113% 2,880,730 Expenditures
200 Gas Tax 1,762,822$ 4,240,697$ 3,488,576$ 1,870,769$ 54% (1,617,807)$ 205 SB1 18,843 1,334,718 1,781,474 1,785,096 100% 3,622 206 Area Drainage Plan (ADP) - 487 300,000 3,500 1% (296,500) 210 Measure A 1,753,606 604,674 3,676,549 1,829,024 50% (1,847,525) 211 TDA Fund - - 432,500 92,892 21% (339,608) 220 AQMD 3,015 25,430 71,722 116,511 162% 44,789 230 Law Enforcement Grants - - - - 0% - 240 Grants: Miscellaneous Grants Fund 871,267 381,717 2,721,652 520,597 19% (2,201,055) 241 Grants: Coronavirus Relief Fund 31,197 788,813 - - 0% - 242 Grants: American Rescue Plan Act Fund - - 7,360,219 7,360,219 100% - 243 Public, Educational, or Governmental Access Fund - - - - 0% - 250 Grants: Community Development Block Grant (82,879) - 100,000 - 0% (100,000) 260 Local Law Enforcement Services 199,152 157,746 - - 0% - 270 TUMF Reimbursement Fund 1,557,661 263,986 2,000,000 335,792 17% (1,664,208) 290 Transportation DIF 1,796,100 92 3,850 - 0% (3,850) 291 Fire DIF 1,163 - 1,520 - 0% (1,520) 292 Public Facilities DIF 3,632 656,148 11,030 242 2% (10,788) 293 Road and Bridge Benefit District 227 160,802 240,000 131,105 55% (108,895) 300 LLMD 89-1 Zone 10 152 1,414 1,642 508 31% (1,134) 301 LLMD 89-1 Zone 33 121 334 982 315 32% (667) 302 LLMD 89-1 Zone 41 13,867 15,601 169,650 57,210 34% (112,440) 303 LLMD 89-1 Zone 79 1,337 1,430 2,505 2,717 108% 212 304 LLMD 89-1 Zone 85 113 151 2,890 705 24% (2,185) 305 LLMD 89-1 Zone 111 8,923 10,954 23,925 17,153 72% (6,772) 306 LLMD 89-1 Zone 115 10,874 7,143 5,820 12,838 221% 7,018 City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 412
CITY OF EASTVALE UNAUDITED: 98% Reported
Fiscal Year 2021-22
Interim Financial Report | QUARTER FOUR ending June 30, 2022 | 12 months Other Funds Summary
*Data includes transfers Restated
Audited
Actuals
Restated
Audited
Actuals
Adjusted
Budget Actuals
Amount
Over(Under)
Budget
Description 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 6/30/2022 2021-22
% Budget
Used
307 LLMD 89-1 Zone 116 3,623 3,786 4,220 5,799 137% 1,579 308 LLMD 89-1 Zone 147 2,947 3,026 2,675 4,315 161% 1,640 309 LLMD 89-1 Zone 151 11,934 14,884 11,535 15,413 134% 3,878 310 LLMD 89-1 Zone 156 8,940 8,991 9,530 10,803 113% 1,273 311 Benefit Assessment District 2014-2 3,032 3,233 12,505 6,701 54% (5,804) 312 LLMD 2014-1 2,048 2,187 19,190 6,612 34% (12,578) 313 LLMD 2014-3 2,222 2,374 7,760 4,422 57% (3,338) 314 LLMD 2014-4 851 909 6,560 2,230 34% (4,330) 315 Community Facilities District 2019-1 2,403 3,208 2,620 3,840 147% 1,220 400 Community Facilities District 2017-1 2,459 3,282 9,400 4,079 43% (5,321) 401 Community Facilities District 2017-2 2,503 17,709 25,300 19,822 78% (5,478) 402 Community Facilities District 2020-1 4,726 10,258 90,713 83,539 92% (7,174) 404 LMD 98-2 ANNEX 01/Zone A - - - 1,599 0% 1,599 405 LMD 98-2 ANNEX 02/Zone B - - - 4,197 0% 4,197 406 LMD 98-2 ANNEX 03/Zone C - - - 28,806 0% 28,806 407 LMD 98-2 ANNEX 04/Zone D - - - 4,028 0% 4,028 408 LMD 98-2 ANNEX 06/Zone F - - - 8,607 0% 8,607 409 LMD 2001-1 Zone G - - - 2,718 0% 2,718 410 LMD 2001-1 Zone S - - - 135 0% 135 411 LMD 2001-1 Zone W - - - 324 0% 324 412 LMD 2001-2 Zone A - - - 6,174 0% 6,174 413 LMD 2001-2 Zone B - - - 3,033 0% 3,033 414 LMD 2001-2 Zone C - - - 2,632 0% 2,632 415 LMD 2001-2 Zone D - - - 124 0% 124 416 LMD 2001-2 Zone F - - - 1,768 0% 1,768 417 LMD 2001-2 Zone G - - - 507 0% 507 418 LMD 2001-2 Zone H - - - 1,450 0% 1,450 419 LMD 2001-2 Zone J - - - 4,460 0% 4,460 420 LMD 2001-2 Zone K - - - 2,934 0% 2,934 421 LMD 2001-2 Zone M - - - 837 0% 837 422 LMD 2001-3 Zone A - - - 362 0% 362 423 LMD 2001-3 Zone B - - - 18,822 0% 18,822 424 LMD 2001-3 Zone C - - - 6,507 0% 6,507 425 LMD 2001-3 Zone D - - - 865 0% 865 426 LMD 2001-3 Zone E - - - 2,000 0% 2,000 427 LMD 2001-3 Zone F - - - 4,433 0% 4,433 428 LMD 2001-3 Zone G - - - 187 0% 187 429 LMD 2001-3 Zone H - - - 2,379 0% 2,379 430 LMD 2001-3 Zone I - - - 1,052 0% 1,052 431 LMD 2001-3 Zone J - - - 5,479 0% 5,479 432 LMD 2001-3 Zone K - - - 1,552 0% 1,552 433 LMD 2001-3 Zone L - - - 2,476 0% 2,476 434 LMD 2001-3 Zone M - - - 1,904 0% 1,904 435 LMD 2001-3 Zone N - - - 3,211 0% 3,211 436 LMD 2001-3 Zone O - - - 7,192 0% 7,192 437 LMD 2001-3 Zone P - - - 277 0% 277 438 LMD 2001-3 Zone Q - - - 1,582 0% 1,582 439 LMD 2001-3 Zone R - - - 801 0% 801 440 LMD 2001-3 Zone S - - - 211 0% 211 441 LMD 2001-3 Zone T - - - 310 0% 310 442 LMD 2001-3 Zone U - - - 2,263 0% 2,263 443 LMD 2001-3 Zone V - - - 1,720 0% 1,720 444 LMD 2001-3 Zone W - - - 2,664 0% 2,664 City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 413
CITY OF EASTVALE UNAUDITED: 98% Reported
Fiscal Year 2021-22
Interim Financial Report | QUARTER FOUR ending June 30, 2022 | 12 months Other Funds Summary
*Data includes transfers Restated
Audited
Actuals
Restated
Audited
Actuals
Adjusted
Budget Actuals
Amount
Over(Under)
Budget
Description 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 6/30/2022 2021-22
% Budget
Used
445 LMD 2001-3 Zone X - - - 931 0% 931 446 LMD 2001-3 Zone Y - - - 239 0% 239 447 LMD 2001-3 Zone Z - - - 388 0% 388 448 LMD 2001-3 Zone AA - - - 425 0% 425 449 LMD 2001-3 Zone BB - - - 289 0% 289 450 LMD 2001-3 Zone CC - - - 224 0% 224 451 LMD 2001-3 Zone DD - - - 2,361 0% 2,361 452 LMD 2001-3 Zone EE - - - 2,492 0% 2,492 453 LMD 2001-3 Zone FF - - - 1,276 0% 1,276 454 LMD 2001-3 Zone GG - - - 2,923 0% 2,923 455 LMD 2001-3 Zone HH - - - 647 0% 647 456 LMD 2001-3 Zone II - - - 522 0% 522 457 LMD 2001-3 Zone JJ - - - 1,099 0% 1,099 458 LMD 2001-3 Zone KK - - - 204 0% 204 459 LMD 2001-3 Zone LL - - - 1,214 0% 1,214 460 LMD 2001-3 Zone MM - - - 444 0% 444 461 LMD 2001-3 Zone NN - - - 660 0% 660 462 LMD 2001-3 Zone OO - - - 780 0% 780 463 LMD 2001-3 Zone PP - - - 831 0% 831 464 LMD 2001-3 Zone QQ - - - 1,029 0% 1,029 465 LMD 2001-3 Zone RR - - - 407 0% 407 466 LMD 2001-3 Zone SS - - - 2,465 0% 2,465 467 LMD 2001-3 Zone TT - - - 889 0% 889 468 LMD 2001-3 Zone UU - - - 463 0% 463 469 LMD 2001-3 Zone VV - - - 260 0% 260 470 LMD 2001-3 Zone WW - - - 329 0% 329 471 LMD 2001-3 Zone XX - - - 1,069 0% 1,069 472 LMD 2001-3 Zone YY - - - 323 0% 323 473 LMD 2001-3 Zone ZZ - - - 2,554 0% 2,554 474 LMD 2001-3 Zone AAA - - - 463 0% 463 475 LMD 2001-3 Zone BBB - - - 1,940 0% 1,940 476 LMD 2001-3 Zone CCC - - - 1,414 0% 1,414 477 LMD 2001-3 Zone DDD - - - 3,708 0% 3,708 478 LMD 2001-3 Zone EEE - - - 2,496 0% 2,496 479 LMD 2001-3 Zone FFF - - - 33 0% 33 480 LMD 2001-3 Zone GGG - - - 2,265 0% 2,265 481 LMD 2001-3 Zone HHH - - - 1,079 0% 1,079 482 LMD 2001-3 Zone III - - - 2,030 0% 2,030 483 LMD 2001-3 Zone JJJ - - - 3,489 0% 3,489 484 LMD 2001-3 Zone LLL - - - 1,347 0% 1,347 485 LMD 2001-3 Zone MMM - - - 7,900 0% 7,900 486 Illumination District No 2 Subarea 35 - - - 944 0% 944 487 Illumination District No 2 Subarea 42 - - - 1,198 0% 1,198 488 Illumination District No 2 Subarea 46 - - - 395 0% 395 489 Illumination District No 2 Subarea 49 - - - 1,153 0% 1,153 490 Illumination District No 2 Subarea 55 - - - 1,419 0% 1,419 500 Debt Service 468,699 467,960 4,277,632 4,510,719 105% 233,087 600 Capital Projects 408,263 609,510 3,961,000 1,012,390 26% (2,948,610) 700 Information Technology - - - 10,000 0% 10,000 Total Other Fund Expenditures 8,875,845 9,803,655 30,837,147 20,041,468 65% (10,805,679) City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 414
CITY OF EASTVALE UNAUDITED: 98% Reported
Fiscal Year 2021-22
Interim Financial Report | QUARTER FOUR ending June 30, 2022 | 12 months Available Resources Summary
Restated Audited
Fund Balance
Restated Audited
Fund Balance Revenue Actuals
Expenditure
Actuals
Estimated
Available Balance
Fund Name & Type 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2021-22 6/30/2022

GENERAL FUNDS
100 General Fund 36,539,651$ 61,854,162$ 67,953,770$ 33,447,207$ 96,360,725$ TOTAL General Funds 36,539,651 61,854,162 67,953,770 33,447,207 96,360,725

OTHER PURPOSE GENERAL FUNDS
110 Restricted Structural Fire Fund 11,445,158$ 13,238,041$ 7,694,689$ 6,459,615$ 14,473,114$ TOTAL Other Purpose General Funds 11,445,158 13,238,041 7,694,689 6,459,615 14,473,114

SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
200 Gas Tax Fund 6,346,814$ 3,543,943$ 1,604,905$ 1,870,769$ 3,278,078$ 205 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Fund 1,249,341 1,143,195 1,378,406 1,785,096 736,505 206 Area Drainage Plan (ADP) 906,050 903,503 (493) 3,500 899,511 210 Measure A Fund 3,120,285 4,350,543 2,007,954 1,829,024 4,529,473 211 TDA Fund - - - 92,892 (92,892) 220 Air Quality Management District 427,465 493,791 143,575 116,511 520,855 230 Law Enforcement Grants - - - - - 240 Grants: Miscellaneous Grants Fund 971 (162,796) 668,027 520,597 (15,366) 241 Grants: Coronavirus Relief Fund - - - - - 242 Grants: American Rescue Plan Act Fund - - 7,360,219 7,360,219 - 243 Public, Educational, or Governmental Access Fund - - - - - 250 Grants: Community Development Block Grant (7) (7) - - (7) 260 Local Law Enforcement Services 51 - 165,428 - 165,428 270 TUMF Reimbursement Find (58) (281,100) - 335,792 (616,892) 290 DIF Transportation Facilities Fund 443,538 310,602 119,761 - 430,363 291 DIF Fire Facilities Fund 446,130 500,518 46,690 - 547,208 292 DIF Public Facilities Fund 755,431 496,836 102,648 242 599,242 293 Road and Bridge Benefit District 6,521,727 6,445,412 (3,525) 131,105 6,310,782 300 LLMD 89-1 Zone 10 (9,154) (7,381) 3,820 508 (4,069) 301 LLMD 89-1 Zone 33 28,459 6,464 1,171 315 7,320 302 LLMD 89-1 Zone 41 1,527,671 1,701,381 171,435 57,210 1,815,606 303 LLMD 89-1 Zone 79 15,629 16,580 2,593 2,717 16,456 304 LLMD 89-1 Zone 85 27,806 28,766 3,008 705 31,069 305 LLMD 89-1 Zone 111 147,718 162,397 23,997 17,153 169,240 306 LLMD 89-1 Zone 115 (14,759) (19,095) 3,726 12,838 (28,207) 307 LLMD 89-1 Zone 116 54,933 59,745 8,031 5,799 61,976 308 LLMD 89-1 Zone 147 (2,253) (3,448) 1,552 4,315 (6,212) 309 LLMD 89-1 Zone 151 (34,509) (43,000) 7,659 15,413 (50,753) 310 LLMD 89-1 Zone 156 (13,199) (17,467) 5,750 10,803 (22,520) 311 Benefit Assessment District 2014-2 7,184 8,727 12,563 6,701 14,588 312 LLMD 2014-1 5,981 7,576 4,645 6,612 5,608 313 LLMD 2014-3 3,810 4,748 4,016 4,422 4,343 314 LLMD 2014-4 4,559 5,729 2,377 2,230 5,876 315 Community Facilities District 2019-1 (13,051) (6,975) 10,162 3,840 (654) 400 Community Facilities District 2017-1 118,478 188,809 74,687 4,079 259,417 401 Community Facilities District 2017-2 14,923 30,523 43,192 19,822 53,893 402 Community Facilities District 2020-1 - 62,605 73,900 83,539 52,966 403 LMD 98-2 ORIGINAL - - 16,614 1,599 15,016 404 LMD 98-2 ANNEX 01/Zone A - - 2,006 4,197 (2,191) 405 LMD 98-2 ANNEX 02/Zone B - - 41,892 28,806 13,087 406 LMD 98-2 ANNEX 03/Zone C - - 4,299 4,028 272 407 LMD 98-2 ANNEX 04/Zone D - - 6,233 8,607 (2,374) 408 LMD 98-2 ANNEX 06/Zone F - - 29,479 2,718 26,761 409 LMD 2001-1 Zone G - - 1,860 135 1,725 410 LMD 2001-1 Zone S - - 2,418 324 2,094 411 LMD 2001-1 Zone W - - 20,319 6,174 14,145 412 LMD 2001-2 Zone A - - 49,084 3,033 46,051 413 LMD 2001-2 Zone B - - 26,323 2,632 23,692 City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 415
CITY OF EASTVALE UNAUDITED: 98% Reported
Fiscal Year 2021-22
Interim Financial Report | QUARTER FOUR ending June 30, 2022 | 12 months Available Resources Summary
Restated Audited
Fund Balance
Restated Audited
Fund Balance Revenue Actuals
Expenditure
Actuals
Estimated
Available Balance
Fund Name & Type 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2021-22 6/30/2022 414 LMD 2001-2 Zone C - - 1,422 124 1,297 415 LMD 2001-2 Zone D - - 17,281 1,768 15,513 416 LMD 2001-2 Zone F - - 3,124 507 2,617 417 LMD 2001-2 Zone G - - 26,451 1,450 25,001 418 LMD 2001-2 Zone H - - 39,841 4,460 35,381 419 LMD 2001-2 Zone J - - 27,339 2,934 24,405 420 LMD 2001-2 Zone K - - 1,953 837 1,116 421 LMD 2001-2 Zone M - - 2,313 362 1,951 422 LMD 2001-3 Zone A - - 3,901 18,822 (14,920) 423 LMD 2001-3 Zone B - - 3,372 6,507 (3,135) 424 LMD 2001-3 Zone C - - 22,447 865 21,582 425 LMD 2001-3 Zone D - - 45,651 2,000 43,650 426 LMD 2001-3 Zone E - - 100,068 4,433 95,635 427 LMD 2001-3 Zone F - - 38,146 187 37,959 428 LMD 2001-3 Zone G - - 3,433 2,379 1,054 429 LMD 2001-3 Zone H - - 15,431 1,052 14,379 430 LMD 2001-3 Zone I - - 61,636 5,479 56,157 431 LMD 2001-3 Zone J - - 17,621 1,552 16,069 432 LMD 2001-3 Zone K - - 17,999 2,476 15,524 433 LMD 2001-3 Zone L - - 19,033 1,904 17,129 434 LMD 2001-3 Zone M - - 55,732 3,211 52,521 435 LMD 2001-3 Zone N - - 40,754 7,192 33,562 436 LMD 2001-3 Zone O - - 6,567 277 6,290 437 LMD 2001-3 Zone P - - 38,444 1,582 36,861 438 LMD 2001-3 Zone Q - - 15,384 801 14,583 439 LMD 2001-3 Zone R - - 1,847 211 1,636 440 LMD 2001-3 Zone S - - 7,420 310 7,110 441 LMD 2001-3 Zone T - - 56,935 2,263 54,672 442 LMD 2001-3 Zone U - - 37,518 1,720 35,798 443 LMD 2001-3 Zone V - - 63,250 2,664 60,586 444 LMD 2001-3 Zone W - - 19,436 931 18,505 445 LMD 2001-3 Zone X - - 5,511 239 5,272 446 LMD 2001-3 Zone Y - - 9,199 388 8,812 447 LMD 2001-3 Zone Z - - 10,172 425 9,747 448 LMD 2001-3 Zone AA - - 6,459 289 6,169 449 LMD 2001-3 Zone BB - - 5,998 224 5,773 450 LMD 2001-3 Zone CC - - 23,545 2,361 21,184 451 LMD 2001-3 Zone DD - - 50,804 2,492 48,312 452 LMD 2001-3 Zone EE - - 24,718 1,276 23,442 453 LMD 2001-3 Zone FF - - 30,352 2,923 27,429 454 LMD 2001-3 Zone GG - - 15,361 647 14,714 455 LMD 2001-3 Zone HH - - 12,318 522 11,796 456 LMD 2001-3 Zone II - - 27,610 1,099 26,511 457 LMD 2001-3 Zone JJ - - 4,936 204 4,732 458 LMD 2001-3 Zone KK - - 2,840 1,214 1,626 459 LMD 2001-3 Zone LL - - 10,706 444 10,262 460 LMD 2001-3 Zone MM - - 8,127 660 7,467 461 LMD 2001-3 Zone NN - - 19,058 780 18,279 462 LMD 2001-3 Zone OO - - 18,801 831 17,970 463 LMD 2001-3 Zone PP - - 22,117 1,029 21,087 464 LMD 2001-3 Zone QQ - - 8,646 407 8,240 465 LMD 2001-3 Zone RR - - 57,350 2,465 54,886 466 LMD 2001-3 Zone SS - - 21,352 889 20,463 467 LMD 2001-3 Zone TT - - 9,115 463 8,653 468 LMD 2001-3 Zone UU - - 7,013 260 6,753 469 LMD 2001-3 Zone VV - - 5,913 329 5,584 470 LMD 2001-3 Zone WW - - 24,557 1,069 23,488 471 LMD 2001-3 Zone XX - - 3,485 323 3,162 City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 416
CITY OF EASTVALE UNAUDITED: 98% Reported
Fiscal Year 2021-22
Interim Financial Report | QUARTER FOUR ending June 30, 2022 | 12 months Available Resources Summary
Restated Audited
Fund Balance
Restated Audited
Fund Balance Revenue Actuals
Expenditure
Actuals
Estimated
Available Balance
Fund Name & Type 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2021-22 6/30/2022 472 LMD 2001-3 Zone YY - - 27,198 2,554 24,644 473 LMD 2001-3 Zone ZZ - - 10,999 463 10,536 474 LMD 2001-3 Zone AAA - - 47,875 1,940 45,935 475 LMD 2001-3 Zone BBB - - 30,633 1,414 29,219 476 LMD 2001-3 Zone CCC - - 65,649 3,708 61,941 477 LMD 2001-3 Zone DDD - - 56,156 2,496 53,661 478 LMD 2001-3 Zone EEE - - 6,178 33 6,144 479 LMD 2001-3 Zone FFF - - 54,422 2,265 52,156 480 LMD 2001-3 Zone GGG - - 19,667 1,079 18,588 481 LMD 2001-3 Zone HHH - - 828 2,030 (1,202) 482 LMD 2001-3 Zone III - - 26,775 3,489 23,286 483 LMD 2001-3 Zone JJJ - - 31,039 1,347 29,692 484 LMD 2001-3 Zone LLL - - 6,082 7,900 (1,818) 485 LMD 2001-3 Zone MMM - - 20,021 944 19,078 486 Illumination District No 2 Subarea 35 - - 8,738 1,198 7,540 487 Illumination District No 2 Subarea 42 - - 2,511 395 2,115 488 Illumination District No 2 Subarea 46 - - 9,323 1,153 8,171 489 Illumination District No 2 Subarea 49 - - 11,825 1,419 10,406 490 Illumination District No 2 Subarea 55 - - 2,341 255 2,086 TOTAL Special Revenue Funds 22,087,963 19,931,122 15,948,480 14,508,614 21,370,988

DEBT SERVICE FUND
500 General Debt Service Fund -$ 739$ 4,277,633$ 4,510,719$ (232,348)$ TOTAL Debt Service Fund - 739 4,277,633 4,510,719 (232,348)

DEBT SERVICE FUND
600 General Capital Projects Fund 876,485$ 1,786,981$ 2,053,029$ 1,012,390$ 2,827,621$ TOTAL Capital Projects Fund 876,485 1,786,981 2,053,029 1,012,390 2,827,621

INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS
700 Information Technology Reserve Fund -$ - -$ 10,000$ (10,000)$ TOTAL Internal Service Funds - - - 10,000 (10,000) TOTAL 70,949,256$ 96,811,044$ 97,927,601$ 59,948,545$ 134,790,100$

GENERAL FUND - FUND BALANCE RESERVES AND COMMITMENTS
Total General Fund Estimated Fund Balance at 06/30/2022 96,360,725$ Assigned:

Emergency Contingency (50% of Adopted Appropriations) 14,063,031 Total Assigned Reserves 14,063,031
Committed:

Facility Construction: Library 10,000,000
Facility Construction: City Hall 20,000,000
Facility Construction: Police Substation 4,000,000
Hamner Place Land Acquisition Final Payment 1,840,000
Pension Liability (CalPERS Reserve) 1,620,500
Public Safety Rate Increase Stabilization 1,000,000
38,460,500
Committed Appropriations Limit Qualified Capital Outlay Reserve:

General Fund: Facility Construction: Library - Appropriations Limit 10,595,000 General Fund: Facility Construction: City Hall - Appropriations Limit 18,399,529 General Fund: Limonite Gap Bridge Construction - Appropriations Limit 2,500,000 General Fund: Equipment Purchase, Fire Truck - Appropriations Limit 1,500,000 General Fund: Facility Construction, Fire Station 27 Storage Facility - Appropriations Limit 2,000,000 34,994,529
City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 417
CITY OF EASTVALE UNAUDITED: 98% Reported
Fiscal Year 2021-22
Interim Financial Report | QUARTER FOUR ending June 30, 2022 | 12 months Available Resources Summary
Restated Audited
Fund Balance
Restated Audited
Fund Balance Revenue Actuals
Expenditure
Actuals
Estimated
Available Balance
Fund Name & Type 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2021-22 6/30/2022 Total General Funds Estimated Unassigned Fund Balance at 06/30/2022 8,842,665$

RESTRICTED STRUCTURAL FIRE FUND - FUND BALANCE RESERVES AND COMMITMENTS Total Fire Funds Estimated Fund Balance at 06/30/2022 14,473,114$ Assigned:

Emergency Contingency (75% of Adopted Appropriations) 4,844,711 Total Assigned Reserves 4,844,711
Committed:

Facility Construction: Third Fire Station 8,000,000
Equipment Purchase: Apparatus Replacement Reserve 400,000 8,400,000
Total Fire Funds Estimated Unassigned Fund Balance at 06/30/2022 1,228,403$ City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 418
CITY OF EASTVALE UNAUDITED: 98% Reported
Fiscal Year 2021-22
Interim Financial Report | QUARTER FOUR ending June 30, 2022 | 12 months Assigned Reserve: Contingency Calculation
Restated Audited
Fund Balance
Restated Audited
Fund Balance
Mid-Year
Adjusted
Revenue Budget
Mid-Year
Adjusted
Expenditure
Budget
Estimated
Available Balance
Fund Name & Type 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2021-22 6/30/2022

GENERAL FUNDS
100 General Fund 36,539,651$ 61,854,162$ 75,382,279$ 36,133,217$ 101,103,224$ TOTAL General Funds 36,539,651 61,854,162 75,382,279 36,133,217 101,103,224 Assigned 50% Contingency Reserve
Policy: 50% of Annual Budgeted Operating Expenditures
Total Expenditures 36,133,217
Non-Operating Expenditures 8,007,154
Operating Expenditures 28,126,063
50% Reserve 14,063,031

OTHER PURPOSE GENERAL FUNDS
110 Restricted Structural Fire Fund 11,445,158$ 13,238,041$ 7,571,931$ 6,892,484$ 13,917,488$ TOTAL Other Purpose General Funds 11,445,158 13,238,041 7,571,931 6,892,484 13,917,488 Assigned 75% Contingency Reserve
Policy: 75% of Annual Budgeted Operating Expenditures
Total Expenditures 6,892,484
Non-Operating Expenditures -
Operating Expenditures 6,892,484
75% Reserve 5,169,363
City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 419
CITY OF EASTVALE UNAUDITED: 98% Reported
Fiscal Year 2021-22
Interim Financial Report | QUARTER FOUR ending June 30, 2022 | 12 months Appropriations Limit Summary
Pre Voter
Approved
Override
Voter Approved
Override
Post Voter
Approved
Override
2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2020-21 2021-22

ADOPTED APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT
Adopted Appropriations Limit 21,455,814$ 23,077,364$ 24,418,797$ 25,794,921$ 33,000,000$ 35,473,578$ Subject Revenue Appropriations
General Fund 10,045,447 15,809,535 17,472,985 17,952,129 41,516,698 54,973,760 Fire Fund 5,055,030 5,346,150 6,285,042 6,406,287 6,406,287 7,298,931 Total Subject Revenue Appropriations 15,100,477 21,155,685 23,758,027 24,358,416 47,922,985 62,272,691 Over(Under) Limit (6,355,337) (1,921,679) (660,770) (1,436,505) 14,922,985 26,799,113 Annual Available for Capital Outlay 14,922,985 26,799,113 Cumulative Available for Capital Outlay 41,722,098
Cumulative Available for Capital Outlay Expenditures and Reserves 41,722,098 FY2021-22 Proposed Mid-Year Reserve Commitments
General Fund: Facility Construction Library - Appropriations Limit 10,595,000 General Fund: Facility Construction City Hall - Appropriations Limit 18,399,529 General Fund: Limonite Gap Bridge - Appropriations Limit 2,500,000 General Fund: Equipment, Fire Truck Purchase - Appropriations Limit 1,500,000 General Fund: Facility, Fire Station 27 Storage Facility - Appropriations Limit 2,000,000 Subtotal Capital Outlay Reserve Commitments 34,994,529
FY2021-22 Proposed Mid-Year Capital Outlay Expenditures Streetlight Debt Pay-Off - Appropriations Limit 4,168,519 Goodman Commerce Sales Tax Abatement Pay-Off - Appropriations Limit 2,559,050 Subtotal Capital Outlay Expenditure Budget 6,727,569
Remaining Appropriations Limit Surplus 0
City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 420
CITY OF EASTVALE UNAUDITED: 98% Reported
Fiscal Year 2021-22
Interim Financial Report | QUARTER FOUR ending June 30, 2022 | 12 months Sales Tax Summary
Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year 2021-22 Quarter 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20** 2020-21 2021-22 Budget Quarter 1 2,172,737 2,454,597 2,986,937 2,873,677 10,585,289 52,000,000 Quarter 2 # 2,270,942 2,693,017 2,807,803 3,144,645 12,241,575 Quarter 3 1,848,685 2,129,355 2,272,291 10,892,874 10,836,091 Quarterly Quarter 4 2,005,467 2,332,606 2,281,948 11,208,862 11,047,330 Budget:

TOTAL Sales Tax 8,297,831 9,609,575 10,348,979 28,120,058 44,710,286 13,000,000 NOTE: Sales tax figures represent sales tax receipts applicable to the quarters indicated. Amounts may not have been actually received in the quarter indicated, these totals may not be represented in other summary reports included in this quarterly interim report.
**Sales tax for quarter 1 2019-20 included a late payment from the state applicable to prior quarters, this timing issue is the result of a state software system conversion. As a result, the amounts for quarter 1 2019-20 appear higher than normal. # The true up for Quarter 2 ending December 31, 2020 has not been received as of the publish date of this report. It was included in the FY2021-22 budget. Per HdL it is likely that the true up payment will be received sometime in the 2022-23 fiscal year.

City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 421

AGENDA STAFF REPORT

City Council Meeting

CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS

Agenda Item No. 13.2
October 26, 2022
Amend Chapter 10.02 of Title 10 to the Eastvale Municipal Code Establishing the Speed Limits on Certain Streets
Prepared By:

Jimmy Chung, City Engineer
Recommended Action(s)
Staff recommends that the City Council introduce, read by tle and waive further reading of an Ordinance amending
Chapter 10.02 of Title 10 to the Eastvale Municipal Code Establishing the Speed Limits on Certain Streets.

Summary
On July 24, 2013, City Council approved the establishment of speed limits on street segments in Eastvale. Subsequent amendments were approved on February 12, 2014, June 24, 2015, July 11, 2018, and January 26, 2022. Since the January 26, 2022 approval of the speed surveys, the following two (2) street segments have been studied:

- Segment 14:

Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road between Hamner Avenue and Interstate 15 to establish
the speed limit for a new segment.
- Segment 16: Citrus Street between Harrison Avenue and Scholar Way required a resurvey in order
to ensure speed limits are appropriate and enforceable.

Background
Posted speed limits are established to inform drivers of the safe speed limit and to protect the general public from reckless and unpredictable behavior of irresponsible drivers. Research has shown that most drivers travel at speeds that are safe and reasonable, therefore, speed limits are 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752 951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
422
established primarily on the consensus of the majority of those who use the roads. Speed limits are not based on the acons of few. The California Vehicle Code requires the limits to be established on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey rather than arbitrary methods.

Posted speed limits also provide law enforcement with a clearly understood method of idenfying and apprehending violators of the Basic Speed Law (CVC Secon 22350), which states: No person shall drive a vehicle on a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property. The posted speed limit gives drivers a clear warning of the maximum speed that is reasonable and prudent under typical driving conditions.

Since the City Council approved the Engineering and Traffic Survey on July 24, 2013, four subsequent amendments were approved. The Engineering Division determined that it is necessary to study thirty-seven (37) street segments. In accordance with State law, the Engineering and Traffic Survey involves three major elements of data collecon and analysis: (1) spot speed radar survey; (2) collision rate analysis; and (3) roadway segment field review to idenfy any roadway characteriscs not readily apparent to motorists. The recommended speed limits are based on these elements. The study and recommended speed limits have also been reviewed and approved by the Riverside Sherriff's Office who provides contract safety services to Eastvale.

Two street segments within the City’s arterial and collector street network were surveyed. The California Vehicle Code requires speed limits to be set near the 85 th
percenle speed for arterial and
collector streets. Based on the Engineering and Traffic Survey results, the recommended speed limit to be established at these two (2) segments is shown below:

Segment No.

Location
Between
Current Speed
Limit (mph)
Recommended
Speed Limit (mph)
14 Cantu-Galleano
Ranch Rd
Hamner Ave and I-
15 Fwy
None
50 16
Citrus St
Harrison Ave and
Scholar Way
45 40

Citrus Street between Harrison and Sumner previously had a wide travel lane and a connuous issue with speeding. In an effort to migate the concern with speeding on Citrus St, an addional travel lane was added on both sides (total 4 lanes) of Citrus St between Harrison Ave and Sumner Ave. In addion, a bike lane was added on both sides of Citrus St between Harrison Ave and Scholar Ave as part of the recent Annual Overlay Project. The CA MUTCD requires secons of the same street with different characteriscs, including number of lanes, adjacent land use, etc. to be studied separately.

The traffic data collected for Citrus Street in 2021 represented the enre segment: from Harrison Avenue to Hamner Avenue. It will sll represent the remaining secon from Scholar Way to Hamner Avenue.

Cantu-Galleano Rd is a short segment that connects City of Ontario and City of Jurupa Valley. It was never surveyed to establish the speed limit.

The current speed limits in the adjacent cies are 55
mph in Ontario and 45 mph in Jurupa Valley.

12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
423
In order for the courts to uphold speeding ckets issued by law enforcement, each cket must be able to withstand the scruny of the courts. This Engineering and Traffic Survey contains documents with sufficient informaon in compliance with State law to jusfy the posted speed limit. Once the ordinance is adopted, the corresponding changes to the posted speed limits on the affected streets will be modified.

Environmental
Approval of the agreement is categorically exempt from California Environment Quality Act (CEQA) review under CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 - Existing Facilities.

Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: 2
| Target #: 5
| Goal #: 7
Improve traffic mobility and management
Fiscal Impact
Several addional speed limit signs need to be installed at various locaons throughout the City. The total cost to install these speed limit signs is esmated to be $3,000. Funds are available in the Measure A fund, Capital Improvement Project number 92001, Account Number 210-510-6695.

Prior City Council/Commission Action
On July 24, 2013, City Council approved the establishment of speed limits on street segments in Eastvale. Subsequent amendments were approved on February 12, 2014, June 24, 2015, July 11, 2018, and January 26, 2022.

Attachment(s)
Attachment 1 - Eastvale 2022 Speed Zone Survey Amendment

Attachment 2 - Proposed Ordinance

12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
424

2022
Citywide Speed Zone Survey
Adopted on October XX, 2022 by Ordinance 2022-XX
Adopted on January 26, 2022 by Ordinance 2022-01
Adopted on July 11, 2018 by Ordinance 18-09
Adopted on June 24, 2015 by Ordinance 2015-14
Adopted on February 12, 2014 by Ordinance 2014-01
Adopted on July24, 2013 by Ordinance 2013-10

Approved By:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP
City Traffic Engineer*
TE 1650

Date
* Contract services provided by Interwest Consulting Group 425

426

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION PAGE

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1

2.0 STUDY METHODOLOGY 3

3.0 SURVEY RESULTS 6

3.1 Spot Speed Radar Survey 6

3.2 Collision Rate Analysis 9

3.3 Roadway Segment Field Review 11

4.0 SURVEY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 12

4.1 Speed Limit Signing 13

5.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 14

5.1 Speed Limit Ordinance 14

APPENDIX

APPENDICES
A Regulations Governing Speed Limits
(Excerpts from the California Vehicle Code)
B Speed Zoning Regulations from the Caltrans California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices and Definitions of Terms
C Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary Sheets
D Strip Maps
E Speed Survey Data Sheets
F Collision Data Sheets
G Radar/Lidar Gun and Operator(s) Certifications

LIST OF TABLES

TABLE PAGE
1 Segment Spot Speed Survey 7
2 Collision Analysis 10
427

428
Introduction

1 SECTION 1.0

INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this report is to document the results of an engineering and traffic survey conducted to update and to establish the speed limits for two (2) segments of the City of Eastvale arterial street network.

The overall study was conducted to comply with existing State regulations concerning the increasing or decreasing of speed limits within City boundaries.

Posted speed limits are established to inform drivers of the safe speed limit and to protect the general public from reckless and unpredictable behavior of irresponsible drivers. Research has shown that most drivers travel at speeds that are safe an d reasonable, therefore, speed limit s are established primarily on the consensus of the majority of those who use the roads. Speed limits are not based on the actions of few.

The California Vehicle Code requires the limits to be established on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey rather than by arbitrary methods.

Posted speed limits also provide law enforcement with a clearly understood method of identifying and apprehending violators of the Basic Speed Law (CVC Section 22350), which states: No person shall drive a vehicle on a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property. The posted speed limit gives drivers a clear warning of the maximum speed that is reasonable and prudent under typical driving conditions.

It is generally accepted that speed limits cannot be successfully enforced without voluntary compliance by a majority of drivers. Consequently, only the driver whose behavior is clearly out of line with the normal flow of traffic is usually targeted for enforcement.

This report contains sufficient information to docum ent that the conditions of the latest edition of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) Sect ion 627 have been satisfied and th at other conditions not readily apparent to a motorist are properly identified. To legally use radar for speed enforcement, Section 40802(b) of the CVC requires that limits be established per Sections 22357 and 22358 of the CVC, the limits must be justified by an Engineering and Traffic Survey conducted within five years prior to the date of the alleged violation. Section 40802(c) of the CVC allows cities to extend the survey period up to seven or 14 years depending on specific criteria. California Asse mbly Bill (AB) 43, related to traffic safety, was signed into law on October 8, 2021. AB 43 modifies certain sections and adds new sections to the CVC pertaining to speed limits. Certain sections of AB 43 took effect on January 1, 2022. Details of these CVC criteria and modifications are provided in Appendix A. CVC S ection 627 also requires that the Engineering and Traffic Survey be conducted in accordance with the latest edition of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD). Details of these CA MUTCD criteria are provided in Appendix B. AB 43 also modified sections of the CA MUTCD, but they do not take effect until the next revision of the CA MUTCD is approved.

On July 10, 2013, City Council approved the establishment and update of speed limits on street segments in Eastvale, followed by amendments approved on February 12, 2014, June 24, 2015, July 11, 2018 and January 26, 2022. Since the January 26, 2022 approval of the speed surveys, the following two (2) street segments have been studied:

14. Cantu-Galleano between Hamner Avenue and Interstate 15 (new segment)

16. Citrus Street between Harrison Avenue and Scholar Way 429
Introduction

2 The segments below were studied for the following reasons:

1. Establish the speed limit for a new segment:
 Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road – Segment 14

2. Segment that required a resurvey in order to ensure speed limits are appropriate and enforceable:
 Citrus Street – Segment 161

This survey will either verify, increase, or decrea se the existing speed limits for the two (2) selected roadway segments within the City of Eastvale, based on the data and results obtained.

At two (2) locations on the City’s network, spot speed surveys were taken in conformance with the State law for conducting engineering and traffic surveys for the purpose of establishing/updating prima facie speed limits. The data was collected in accordance with the latest edition of the CA MUTCD 2014 (rev 6).

Sections of the CA MUTCD that contain the regulations for conducting the required “Engineering and Traffic Survey” are presented in Appendix B. Also in Appendix B are definitions of terms used in speed zone surveys. As previously noted, excerpts from the CVC regarding regulations governing speed limits are presented in Appendix A. The speed zone radar surveys were conducted by Counts Unlimited, Inc.

Certifications for their staff and equipment are provided in Appendix E.

1 In 2022, a City project restriped the section of Citrus Street between Harrison Avenue and Sumner Avenue from 2 to 4 lanes (to match Sumner Avenue to Scholar Way) with bike lanes. Citrus Street between Sumner Ave and Scholar Way was also restriped, to add bike lanes. The result was consistent stripi ng between Harrison Avenue and Scholar Way. The restriping changed the character of the roadway between Harrison Aven ue and Scholar Way, requiring a resurvey for continued enforcement. Citrus Street previously varied along its length from 2 lanes to 4 lanes. With the new striping, a mile-long section of the street now has consistent striping , which is significantly different from the striping between Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue. The City decided to split Citrus Street into two segments, between Harrison Avenue and Scholar Way and between Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue. New speed survey data and traffic count data were collected for the modified segment between Harrison Avenue and Scholar Way. The traffic data collected in the 2021 Engineerin g and Traffic Survey are still applicable to the segment between Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue since there have not been any striping changes to that segment. The traffic collision data for Scholar Way to Hamner Avenue, however, has been modified to reflect the shorter segment, with no change in the findings.
430
Study Methodology
3 SECTION 2.0

STUDY METHODOLOGY

The basic fundamentals for establishing speed limits recognize that the majority of drivers behave in a safe and reasonable manner, and, therefore, th e normally careful and competent actions of a reasonable driver should be considered legal. Speed limits established on the fundamentals conform to the consensus that those who drive the highway determine what speed is reasonable and safe, not on the judgement of one or a few individuals. A radar spot speed survey is usually used to record the prevailing speed of reasonable drivers.

Speed zones are established to inform drivers of the safe speed limit and to protect the general public from unreasonable and reckless drivers. Research has shown that most drivers travel at speeds that are safe and reasonable, therefore, speed limits are established primarily on the consensus of the majority of those who use the roads. Speed limits are not based on the actions of few. The California Vehicle Code requires the limits to be established on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey rather than by arbitrary methods.

Speed limits are also established to advise drivers of conditions which may not be readily apparent to a reasonable driver. For this reason, collision history, roadway conditions, traffic characteristics and land use must also be analyzed before determining speed limits.

The study involved the three major elements of data collection and analysis, as required by California Vehicle Code (CVC) Section 627 a nd as outlined in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD), 2014 Edition, rev 6. The thr ee elements of an Engineering and Traffic Survey, as described in the CVC, are:

1. Prevailing speed as determined by a spot speed survey

2. Collision records

3. Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver

Other factors that may also be considered include:
 Residential Density (as defined in CVC Section 627)
 Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, with increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused.

Spot Speed Survey. Spot speed su rveys, performed by a certifie d radar technician utilizing a calibrated radar gun, were conducted for two (2) roadway segments to determine existing vehicular travel speeds. A minimum of 100 observations were recorded, 50 for each direction of travel, on all the surveyed street segments. This data was used to calculate statistical information such as the 85th percentile speed, 10 mile per hour pace speed, percent of vehicles within the 10 mile per hour pace, median speed and other pertinent data for analysis. The 85th percentile speed is the speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic is traveling. This threshold represents what is historically found to be a safe and reasonable speed for most drivers based on common roadway conditions.

431
Study Methodology
4 Collision Rate. Mid-block traffic collision data for the two (2) roadway segments was tabulated from the City’s and County’s collision records as reported to the Statew ide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) for the period from August 1, 2019 through July 31, 2022 (three years). The collision rate was calculated and considered in recommending the speed limit.

Field Review. The streets were field reviewed to determine/confirm the existing roadway characteristics, condition and placement of signs and markings, adjacent land uses, pedestrian and bicycle activity (with increased co nsideration of vulnerable pedest rian groups), and to identify roadway characteristics that are not readily apparent to vehicle drivers.

Analysis. The three elements and two other factor s described above were used to determine the recommended speed limit. The analysis began with the 85th percentile speed from the spot speed survey and was modified, as appropriate, by the collision rate, pedestrian and bicycle activity, and existing conditions not readily apparent to the driver.

The speed limit is initially established at the nearest 5 mph increment to the 85th percentile speed. It can then be reduced by 5 mph if it meets one of the following two options:

Option 1. CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5 allow th e speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed under certain circumstances.

Option 2. For cases where the nearest 5 mph increment would require rounding up, CVC Section 21400(b) allows the speed limit to be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, however, no further reduction is allowed.

The following examples explain the use of these speed limit criteria:

A. Using Option 1, when the 85th percentile speed is rounded down (i.e. the 85th percentile speed is 37 mph, so the speed limit would be established at 35 mph), the speed limit could be reduced another 5 mph, to 30 mph, if the special conditi ons are met and justification for using the lower speed limit are documented in the engineering and traffic survey.

B. Using Option 1, when the 85th percentile speed is rounded up (i.e. the 85th percentile speed is 38 mph, so the speed limit would be established at 40 mph), the speed limit could be reduced by 5 mph, to 35 mph, if the special conditions are met and justification for using the lower speed limit are documented in the engineering and traffic survey.

C. Using Option 2, when the 85th percentile speed is rounded up (i.e. the 85th percentile speed is 38 mph and would normally be rounded up to 40 mph), instead of rounding up, the speed limit can be reduced by 5 mph (established at 35 mph), but no furt her reduction can be applied.

A greater-than-expected collision rate is one of the special conditions under Option 1, allowing the speed limit to be established 5 mph lower than the rounded speed limit. The collision rate is based on mid-block collisions only. It is determined using the equation shown below and is then compared to the statewide average collision rate for similar roadways, found in Collision Data on California State Highways (roads miles, travel, collisions) published by Caltrans every two years. The latest edition, 2019, was used for this 2022 analysis.

The collision rates are calculated using the following equation:

Collision Rate = Number of Midblock collisions x 106
24-hour volume x 365 x segment length x number of years 432
Study Methodology
5 Where: Number of mid-block collis ions based on 3 years (August 1, 2019 through July 31, 2022), 24- hour traffic volume (both directions) in the survey segment and segment length in miles. Rates are shown in Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles (per year) or Col/MVM.

California Assembly Bill (AB) 43 modified certain sections of the California Vehicle Code (CVC), which also pertain to certain sections of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD). Some of the modified sections of the CVC became effective on January 1, 2022, whereas other changes related to the CA MUTC D do not go into effect until the CA MUTCD is updated. Neither of the two study segments were affected by AB 43. Details of the changes related to AB 43 are provided in Appendix A.
433
Survey Results
6 SECTION 3.0

SURVEY RESULTS

3.1 Spot Speed Radar Survey

Spot speed radar surveys were conducted at each street segment to establish a reasonable and effective speed limit based on the premise that the speed limit thus established conforms to the actual behavior of the majority of motorists. The speed limit should normally be established at the five mile per hour increment nearest the 85th percentile speed, as recorded for the surveyed segment. However, engineering judgment and other factors such as collision rates (Section 3.2) and Roadway Segment Field Review (Section 3.3) may indicate the need for further reduction in establishing reasonable and effective speed limits. Table 1 shows the existing speed limit and the 85th percentile speed for each studied segment.

The criteria used to conduct the radar survey are listed in Appendices A and B.

Appendix C contains the Engineering and Speed Su rvey Summary sheets for each of the two (2) segments surveyed as well as those for segmen ts previously studied. The data collected and information calculated for the radar speed survey are as follows:

 Posted speed limit
 Direction of survey
 Date and time of speed survey
 Weather conditions
 Number of vehicles observed in each direction
 Speed of each surveyed vehicle
 15th percentile speed
 50th Percentile speed
 85th Percentile speed
 10 mph pace speed
 Percent over pace speed
 Percent in pace speed
 Percent under pace speed
 Average speed

The summary contains information about vehicu lar speed data observed, collision data, street classification, and any unusual conditions at the location. 434

7 Table 1: Segment Spot Speed Summary 1
(May 2022)

No

Street

Between

Dir
Existing
Speed Limit2
(mph)
85th%ile
Speed
(mph)
Recommended
Speed Limit
(mph)

Comments
1 58th Street Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue E/W 35 40 35 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 2 65th Street Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue E/W 40 44 40 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 3 Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue E/W 40 47 40 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian & bicyclist safety, particularly for vulnerable pedestrian groups
4 Hamner Avenue and Wells Spring Street /
East City Limit
E/W 35 42 35 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian & bicyclist safety, particularly for vulnerable pedestrian groups
5 6
68th Street Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue E/W 45 49 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 Hamner Avenue and East City Limit E/W 45 47 45 No Change - 85th%ile 7 Archibald Avenue Bluff Street and Wind River/Grapewin Street

N/S 55 57 55 No Change - 85th%ile
8 Wind River/Grapewin Street and
Schleisman Road
N/S 50 57 50 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian & bicyclist safety, particularly for vulnerable pedestrian groups
9 Schleisman Road and Bellegrave Avenue /
North City Limit
N/S 50 55 50 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1
10 Baron Road Archibald Avenue and Northernly Terminus E/W 35 40 35 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 11 12
Bellegrave Avenue Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue E/W 50 53 50 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 Hamner Avenue and East City Limit E/W 50 48 50 No Change - 85th%ile 13 Blossom Way Harrison Avenue and Sumner Avenue E/W 30 37 30 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian & bicyclist safety, particularly for vulnerable pedestrian groups
14 Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road Hamner Ave and I-15 Freeway E/W None 51 50 Establishing Speed Limit – 85th%ile 15 Chandler Street Hellman Avenue and Harrison Avenue E/W 45 52 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian & bicyclist safety, particularly for vulnerable pedestrian groups
16 Citrus Street Harrison Avenue and Scholar Way E/W 45 47 40 Decrease - 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian & bicyclist safety, particularly for vulnerable pedestrian groups
17 Scholar Way to Hamner Avenue E/W 45 47 45 No Change - 85th%ile 18 Fieldmaster Street Hall Road and Archibald Avenue E/W 40 43 40 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 19 Goodman Way Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road and Hamner
Avenue
N/S &
E/W
None 41 35 Establishing Speed Limit – 85%ile, Option 1, Very heavy truck traffic, many peds, no bike lanes
20 Hamner Avenue South City Limit and Schleisman Road N/S 50 52 45 Decrease - 85th%ile, Option 1 21 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue N/S 45 51 45 No Change, - 85th%ile, Option 1 - Reduction of speed due to crash history 22 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue N/S 45 51 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 23 Bellegrave Avenue and Cantu-Galleano
Ranch Road
N/S None 55 50 Establishing Speed Limit - 85th%ile, Option 2 24 Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road and Riverside
Drive
N/S None 55 50 Establishing Speed Limit - 85th%ile, Option 2 25 Riverside Drive & Philadelphia Street N/S None 55 50 Establishing Speed Limit - 85th%ile, Option 2 26 27
Harrison Avenue Chandler Street and Schleisman Road N/S 45 50 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 Schleisman Road and Blossom Way N/S 45 47 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian & bicyclist safety, particularly for vulnerable pedestrian groups
28 29
Hellman Avenue River Road and Chandler Street N/S 50 56 50 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 Chandler Street and Limonite Avenue N/S 50 55 50 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 30 Limonite Avenue to North City Limit N/S None 42 35 Establishing Speed Limit – 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian & bicyclist safety; very heavy truck traffic
31 32
Limonite Avenue Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue E/W 45 53 50 Increase - 85th%ile, Option 2 Sumner Avenue and East City Limit E/W 45 52 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 - Segments of missing sidewalk, heavy pedestrian usa
ge, no bike lanes
33 Mission Boulevard S. Milliken Avenue and Ontario Freeway (I- 15)
E/W None 2 59 55 Establishing Speed Limit - 85th%ile, Option 2 34 Orange Street Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way E/W 30 45 30 No Change – AB 43 - New CVC Section 22358.8 35 Prairie Smoke Road Hellman Avenue and Whitewell Road E/W 35 42 35 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 36 River Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue E/W 40 49 40 No Change – AB 43 – New CVC Section 22358.8 (Continued on Next Page)
435

8 Table 1: Segment Spot Speed Summary 1 (Continued)

No

Street

Between

Dir
Existing
Speed Limit2
(mph)
85th%ile
Speed
(mph)
Recommended
Speed Limit
(mph)

Comments
37 Riverboat Drive Massy Harris Way and Wells Springs
Street
E/W 40 44 40 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2
38 Riverside Drive Hamne r Avenue & East City Limit E/W 50 47 45 Reduce - 85th%ile, Continuity with adjacent segment 39 Schleisman Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue E/W 50 57 50 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 40 Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue E/W 45 49 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 41 Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way E/W 45 48 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 42 Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue E/W 45 51 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 43 44
45 Scholar Way Citrus Street and Schleisman Road N/S 35 39 35 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue N/S 35 43 40 Increase - 85th%ile, Option 2 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue N/S None2 43 40 Establishing Speed Limit - 85th%ile, Option 2 46 47
Sumner Avenue Citrus Street and 65th Street N/S 45 51 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 65th Street and Bellegrave Avenue N/S 45 51 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 48 Whitewell Road Schleisman Road and Prairie Smoke Road N/S 35 40 35 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 - Reduction of speed due to crash history 1 New roadway segments are highlighted in gray.
2,One segment, currently studied (No. 14), did not previously have a speed limit set by an Engineering and Traffic Survey. 3 See Appendix A for modifications to CVC by new CA law, AB 43. See Appendix B, Line 12a, for expl anations of Option 1 and Option 2. 436

9 Survey Results

3.2 Collision Rate Analysis

The mid-block collision rate for each roadway segm ent was determined by using the most recent collision records as required by CVC Section 627. Traffic collisio n data for the two (2) roadway segments being studied was collected from the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) collision records for the City of Eastvale from August 1, 2019 to July 31, 2022. Based on this data, the mid-block collision rates were cal culated for each roadway segment in terms of “collisions per 1,000,000 vehicle miles of travel.”

It was then determined if any of the collision rates warranted a 5 mph reduction in the rounded 85th percentile speed per Option 1. The collision rates were compared to the statewide average collision rates for similar roadways. If the collision rate is greater than the statewide rate, a 5 mph reduction may be considered. Both of the calculated roadway segment collision rates were less than the statewide average, so neither roadway segment qualified for the 5 mph reduction based on the collision rate.

The results of the collision rate calculations are shown in Table 2 and in the Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary sheets (Appendix C). A sample collision rate calculation is shown below.

Example:

Collision Rate = Number of Collisions x 10
6 Vehicles/Day x 365 Days/Year x Miles x Years of Collision Data

Collision rate on: Hamner Avenue betwee n Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue:

Collision Rate = 10 x 10
6 18,890 x 365 x 1.00 x 3

= 0.48 collisions per million vehicle miles (Col/MVM)

The comparison collision rates vary from year to year. The 2019 Statewide average rates, which are the most recent rates available, were used for the two (2) segments stud ied in the 2022 analysis, and are as follows:

No.

Street

Between
Statewide
Average
Collision
Rate
14 Cantu-Galleano I-15 Freeway and Hamner Ave 1.18
16 Citrus Street Harrison Avenue and Scholar Way 1.14

437

10 Table 2: Collision Analysis 1
(Amended September 2022)

No

Street

Between

Segment Length
(mile)

Segment Length
(feet)
Average Daily
Traffic (ADT)
(vehs/day)
Midblock
Collisions2
(3 yr total)
Collision
Rate
(Col/MVM)3
Statewide
Collision
Rate
Segment
Rate More
Than
Statewide
Rate?
1 58th Street Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 0.49 2,568 1,522 0 0.00 1.60 No 2 3
4 65th Street Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 1.00 5,300 5,400 1 0.25 Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 0.87 4,590 3755 1 0.24 0.93 No Hamner Avenue and Wells Spring Street 0.31 1,642 2,561 0 0.00 1.60 No 5 6
68th Street Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 1.00 5,260 5,239 1 0.17 1.32 No Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 0.50 2,650 8,469 1 0.22 0.93 No 7 8
9 Archibald Avenue Bluff Street and Wind River/Grapewin Street 1.46 7,700 13,631 3 0.14 0.93 No Wind River/Grapewin Street and Schleisman Road 1.63 8,580 20934 7 0.19 1.29 No Schleisman Road and Bellegrave/North City Limit 1.14 6,010 22,487 3 0.11 0.98 No 10 Baron Road Archibald Avenue and Northerly Terminus 0.38 2,030 369 0 0.00 1.60 No 11 12
Bellegrave Avenue Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 1.07 5,650 10,629 2 0.16 0.78 No Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 0.49 5,450 10,308 0 0.00 0.93 No 13 Blossom Way Harrison Avenue and Sumner Avenue 0.50 2,650 2497 0 0.00 1.60 No 14 Cantu-Galleano Ranch Rd Hamner Ave and I-15 Freeway 0.44 2,320 21,256 9 0.88 1.18 No 15 Chandler Street Hellman Avenue and Harrison Avenue 1.53 8,075 3828 1 0.16 0.91 No 16 Citrus Street Harrison Avenue and Scholar Way 0.99 5,247 11,140 3 0.25 1.14 No 17 Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 0.50 2,626 7,787 2 0.47 1.39 No 18 Fieldmaster Street Hall Road and Archibald Avenue 0.99 5,215 1,616 0 0.00 1.32 No 19 Goodman Way Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road & Hamner Avenue 0.68 3,600 4,800 0 0.00 20 21
22 23
24 25
Hamner Avenue South City Limit and Schleisman Road 0.62 3,295 18,287 1 0.08 0.98 No Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 1.00 5,275 18,890 11 0.53 0.41 Yes Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue 0.91 4,800 22,223 16 0.72 0.91 No Bellegrave Avenue & Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road 0.83 4,400 19,500 5 0.42 Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road & Riverside Drive 1.23 6,500 17,500 5 0.32 Riverside Drive & Philadelphia Street 0.99 5,200 23,400 1 0.06 26 27
Harrison Avenue Chandler Street and Schleisman Road 1.00 5,266 5,333 1 0.17 0.93 No Schleisman Road and Blossom Way 1.34 7,080 8,461 2 0.16 0.93 No 28 29
30 Hellman Avenue
River Road and Chandler Street 0.97 5,100 6,324 2 0.30 1.32 No Chandler Street and Limonite Avenue 1.54 8,120 10,594 3 0.27 0.93 No Limonite Avenue and North City Limit 0.20 1,070 7,317 0 0.00 0.91 No 31 32
Limonite Avenue Archibald Avenue & Sumner Avenue 1.00 5,300 22,300 8 0.49 Sumner Avenue & East City Limit 1.53 8,100 29,400 35 1.07 33 Mission Boulevard S Milliken Avenue and Ontario Freeway (I-15) 0.50 2,620 19,234 0 0.00 0.86 No 34 Orange Street Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way 0.50 2,630 1,027 1 1.78 1.60 Yes 35 Prairie Smoke Road Hellman Avenue and Whitewell Road 0.26 1,380 1,129 0 0.00 1.60 No 36 River Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue 0.75 3,970 7806 4 0.62 1.32 No 37 Riverboat Drive Massy Harris Way and Wells Springs Street 0.66 3,500 735 0 0.00 1.32 No 38 Riverside Drive Hamner Avenue & East City Limit 0.44 2,300 9,900 0 0.00 39 40
41 42
Schleisman Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue 1.00 5,300 34,671 11 0.29 0.98 No Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 0.99 5,238 14,855 2 0.12 0.93 No Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way 0.50 2,650 7,737 1 0.24 1.32 No Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 0.58 3,040 7,682 0 0.00 0.91 No 43 44
45 Scholar Way Citrus Street & Schleisman Road 0.63 3,300 5,600 4 1.55 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 0.99 5,250 4721 0 0.00 0.91 No Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue 0.70 3,700 6678 1 0.20 1.60 No 46 47
Sumner Avenue Citrus Street and 65th Street 1.12 5,935 4,028 0 0.00 0.93 No 65th Street and Bellegrave Avenue 1.03 5,422 7,857 2 0.23 0.93 No 48 Whitewell Road Schleisman Road and Prairie Smoke Road 0.29 1,542 2,056 2 3.06 1.60 Yes 1 New roadway segments are highlighted in gray. 2 Number of speed-related mid-block traffic collisions during most recently available 3-year period 3 Col/MVM = Collisions (Accidents) per Million Vehicle Miles per year; An actual rate greater than state average rate indicates condition that may allow a lower speed limit. 438

11 Survey Results

3.3 Roadway Segment Field Review

Section 2B.13 of the CA MUTCD 2014, “Speed Limit Signs” states that the speed limit should be established at the nearest five mile per hour increment to the 85th percentile speed recorded during the spot speed survey. However, in matching existing conditions with the traffic safety needs of the community, engineering judgment may indicate the need for a further reduction in speed, as allowed under Option 1. Whenever such factors are considered to establish the speed limit, they should be documented on the speed survey or in the accompanying engineering report.

The roadway segments were driven by Ms. Angelina Miralaie, Traffic Engineer (contracted through Interwest). The roadway characteristics, location of speed limit signs, conditions not readily apparent to the driver (lack of sidewalks/bike lanes, driveways with limited sight distance, clustered driveways, heavy truck activity, etc.), type of land use adjoining the street (commercial, residential, school zone, parks, etc.) and type of roadway (divided, undivided, number of lanes, on-street parking etc.) were recorded as part of the study in Strip Maps Found in Appendix D. The roadway characteristics recorded were used to determine if any physical conditions warranted consideration of an additional five mile per hour reduction of the reco mmended speed in accordance with CVC Section 627.

The results of the roadway segment field review for each segment are indicated on the Engineering and Speed Survey Summary sheets in Appendix C.

 Collision History
 Collision Rate
 Average Daily Traffic Volume
 Road Description, including on-street parking and unusual lane configurations  Lack of Sidewalks and Bike Lanes
 Pedestrian, Bicycle and Truck activity
 Driveways with limited sight distance or clustered driveways  Nearby schools and parks
 Adjacent land uses
439
Survey Findings and Recommendations
12 SECTION 4.0

SURVEY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

In accordance with the State-imposed speed limit establishment regulation, as defined by CVC Section 627 described in Appendix A, there are several factors that may be considered to justify setting the prima facie speed limit five mph below the rounded 85th percentile speed under Option 1.

The factors to be considered are highway, traffic, and roadside conditions, specifically including those listed below, however, factors that are readily apparent to motorists are not to be considered.

 Most recent collision record (mid-block)
 Roadway characteristics
 Shoulder condition
 Grade
 Alignment
 Sight Distance
 Roadside development and environment
 Parking practices and pedestrian activity
 Commercial driveway characteristics (land use)
 Pedestrian traffic with and without sidewalks
 Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, with increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused.
 Residential density

The above factors for each roadway segment surveyed are listed in the Engin eering and Traffic Survey Summary sheets in Appendix C. The 85th percentile speed and the above factors were considered in verifying existing speed limits and recommending speed limit changes (increase or decrease). Additionally, discussions were held with City staff in making decisions with respect to changing existing speed limits. This allowed for consideration of any special knowledge of the segment. Table 1 shows th e surveyed road segments with posted and recommended speed limits. Table 2, the amended Collision Survey Analysis, lists the street traffic volumes, total number of collisions and calculated collision rate. 440
Survey Findings and Recommendations
13 4.1 Speed Limit Signing

All California motorists are required to know the basic 15, 25, and 55 MPH speed laws and are tested on the subject when applying for a driver’s license. Consequently, speed limit signs covering these conditions need not be posted on City streets. However, although not required by law, speed limit signs for these situations may be posted on streets that have significant daily vehicular traffic volumes, a by-pass traffic situation, the continued violation of a residential 25 MPH speed zone, or with other applicable warrants.

It is normal policy to recommend the posting of speed limit signs only of streets that have been covered by the City speed limit ordinance or by warranted situations covered above.

Speed limit signs should be installed at about one-half mile intervals on the City streets which have been speed zoned. Signs are normally installed on the exit side of traffic signal controlled intersections and the more important intersections where there is high side street vehicle entry. It is important that motorists be given adequate information while not over signing, which tends to confuse the motorist.

Enforcement issues can occur when, (a) the highway is posted with inappropriate speed limit signs, (b) the highway is improperly or inadequately posted; or, (c) the highway is not posted nor covered by ordinance and therefore falls under the basic speed law. In any of these events, the result is a debatable validity that may be questioned in court cases where citations are issued and contested.

441
Summary and Conclusions

14 SECTION 5.0

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

1. The radar survey and the raw data collection were conducted per CVC Section 627 and California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, 2014, rev 6, Section 2B.13.

2. Daily traffic counts for two (2) of the selected roadway segments on the City’s arterial roadway network were collected in 2022 on May 18th.

3. Bicycle and Pedestrian mid-block collision frequency was low.

4. A summary of recommended speed limits is provided in Table 1.

5. It was concluded that the existing speed limits on the two (2) studied roadway segments in the City of Eastvale should both be changed, as listed below.

Roadway Segments with Recommended Changes to Speed Limit

No.

Street

Between
Existing
Speed
Limit
(mph)
Recommended
Speed Limit
(mph)

Comments
14 Cantu-Galleano
Ranch Rd
Hamner Avenue and I-15
Freeway None 50 Establishing Speed
Limit – 85th
percentile
16 Citrus Street Harrison Avenue and Scholar
Way 45 MPH 40 MPH Decrease Speed Limit
– 85th percentile,
Option 1

5.1 Speed Limit Ordinance

Based on the recommended speed zone changes, the revised “Speed Zone Ordinances” are as follows:
442
ORDINANCE NO. 2022-XX (DRAFT)

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING IN ITS ENTIRETY CHAPTER 10.02 OF TITLE 10 TO THE EASTVALE MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING SPEED

LIMITS ON CERTAIN STREETS
WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code Sections 22357 and 22358 provide that local entities may declare prima facie speed limits greater than 25 miles per hour on City streets on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey; and
WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code Section 40802 provides for the enforcement of the posted speed limit by the use of radar or other electronic devices which measures the speed of moving vehicles; and
WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code Section 627(b) defines an engineering and traffic survey to include consideration of all of the following:
1) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements; 2) Accident Records;
3) Highway, traffic, and road side conditions not readily apparent to the driver; and WHEREAS, the City of Eastvale has completed a new engineering and traffic survey required under California Vehicle Code Section 22357 and 22358.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Chapter 10.02 of Title10 to the Eastvale Municipal Code is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
"Sec. 10.02.010. - Findings.
(a) The City Council of the City of Eastvale finds that an engineering and traffic survey has been completed in full compliance with the requirements of the California Vehicle Code and the recommendations in the survey should be implemented. Based upon the review of the survey and related information, the City Council finds the prevailing or 85th percentile speeds of the vehicles are:

No

Street

Between
85th
Percentile
(mph)
1 58th Street Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 40
2 65th Street Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 44
3 Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 47
4 Hamner Avenue and Wells Spring Street/East City Limit 42 5 6
68th Street Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 49
Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 47
7 Archibald Avenue Bluff Street and Wind River/Grapewin Street 57 8 Wind River/Grapewin Street and Schleisman Road 57
9 Schleisman Road and Bellegrave Avenue/North City Limit 55 DRAFT
443
10 Baron Road Archibald Avenue and Northernly Terminus 40 11 12
Bellegrave Avenue Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 53
Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 48
13 Blossom Way Harrison Avenue and Sumner Avenue 37
14 Cantu-Galleano
Ranch Road
Hamner Avenue to I-15 Freeway 51
15 Chandler Street Hellman Avenue and Harrison Avenue 52 16 Citrus Street Harrison Avenue and Scholar Way 47
17 Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 47
18 Fieldmaster Street Hall Road and Archibald Avenue 43 19 Goodman Way Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road and Hamner Avenue 41 20 Hamner Avenue South City Limit and Schleisman Road 52 21 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 51
22 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue 51
23 Bellegrave Avenue and Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road 55 24 Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road and Riverside Drive 55
25 Riverside Drive and Philadelphia Street 55
26 27
Harrison Avenue Chandler Street and Schleisman Road 50 Schleisman Road and Blossom Way 47
28 29
Hellman Avenue
River Road and Chandler Street 56
Chandler Street and Limonite Avenue 55
30 Limonite Avenue to North City Limit 42
31 32
Limonite Avenue Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 53
Sumner Avenue and East City Limit 52
33 Mission Boulevard S. Milliken Avenue and Ontario Freeway (I-15) 59 34 Orange Street Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way 45
35 Prairie Smoke Road Hellman Avenue and Whitewell Road 42 36 River Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue 49
37 Riverboat Drive Massy Harris Way and Wells Springs Street 44 38 Riverside Drive Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 47 39 Schleisman Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue 57 40 Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 49
41 Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way 48
42 Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 51
43 Scholar Way Citrus Street and Schleisman Road 39
44 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 43
45 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue 43
46 47
Sumner Avenue Citrus Street and 65th Street 51
65th Street and Bellegrave Avenue 51
48 Whitewell Road Schleisman Road and Prairie Smoke Road 40

DRAFT
444
(b) Based on the review of the Survey, the City Council finds that the most appropriate speed limits to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic that is reasonable and safe for the above-listed streets are set forth herein.

Sec. 10.02.020. - Established.

The following speed limits are as established:

No.

Street

Between

(mph)
1 58th Street Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 35
2 65th Street Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 40
3 Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 40
4 Hamner Avenue and Wells Spring Street/East City Limit 35 5 6
68th Street Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 45
Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 45
7 Archibald Avenue Bluff Street and Wind River/Grapewin Street 55 8 Wind River/Grapewin Street and Schleisman Road 50
9 Schleisman Road and Bellegrave Avenue/North City Limit 50 10 Baron Road Archibald Avenue and Northernly Terminus 35 11 12

Bellegrave Avenue Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 50
Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 50
13 Blossom Way Harrison Avenue and Sumner Avenue 30
14 Cantu-Galleano
Ranch Road
Hamner Avenue and I-15 Freeway 50
15 Chandler Street Hellman Avenue and Harrison Avenue 45 16 Citrus Street Harrison Avenue and Scholar Way 40
17 Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 45
18 Fieldmaster Street Hall Road and Archibald Avenue 40 19 Goodman Way Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road & Hamner Avenue 35 20 Hamner Avenue South City Limit and Schleisman Road 45 21 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 45
22 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue 45
23 Bellegrave Avenue & Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road 50
24 Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road & Riverside Drive 50
25 Riverside Drive & Philadelphia Street 50
26 27
Harrison Avenue Chandler Street and Schleisman Road 45 Schleisman Road and Blossom Way 45
28 29
Hellman Avenue
River Road and Chandler Street 50
Chandler Street and Limonite Avenue 50
30 Limonite Avenue to North City Limit 35
31 32
Limonite Avenue Archibald Avenue & Sumner Avenue 50
Sumner Avenue & East City Limit 45
DRAFT
445
33 Mission Boulevard S. Milliken Avenue and Ontario Freeway (I-15) 55 34 Orange Street Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way 30
35 Prairie Smoke Road Hellman Avenue and Whitewell Road 35 36 River Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue 40
37 Riverboat Drive Massy Harris Way and Wells Springs Street 40 38 Riverside Drive Hamner Avenue & East City Limit 45
39 Schleisman Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue 50 40 Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 45
41 Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way 45
42 Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 45
43 Scholar Way Citrus Street & Schleisman Road 35
44 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 40
45 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue 40
46 47
Sumner Avenue Citrus Street and 65th Street 45
65th Street and Bellegrave Avenue 45
48 Whitewell Road Schleisman Road and Prairie Smoke Road 35

Sec. 10.02.030 - Direction to City Engineer. On or after the effective date of the Ordinance of which this Chapter is derived, the City Engineer is directed to clearly post speed limit signs effectuating Section 10.02.020 above, to give notice that this Chapter is in effect." SECTION 2. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause the same to be published in accordance with the law.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ORDAINED this _____ day of October, 2022.

_______________________________________
Clint Lorimore
Mayor

APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:

DRAFT
446
____________________________ _____________________________ Erica L. Vega Marc A. Donohue, MMC
City Attorney City Clerk/Communications Director

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) §

CITY OF EASTVALE )
I, Marc A. Donahue, City Clerk of the City of Eastvale, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 2022-XX, was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eastvale held on the ____ day of October, 2022, and was passed by the City Council of the City of Eastvale at a regular meeting held on the ___ day of October, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES: XX
NOES: XX
ABSENT: XX
ABSTAIN: XX

_____________________________
Marc A. Donohue, MMC
City Clerk
DRAFT
447
448
ORDINANCE NO. 22-01

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING IN ITS ENTIRETY CHAPTER 10.02 OF TITLE
10 TO THE EASTVALE MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING SPEED

LIMITS ON CERTAIN STREETS
WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code Sections 22357 and 22358 provide that local entities may declare prima facie speed limits greater than 25 miles per hour on City streets on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey; and
WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code Section 40802 provides for the enforcement of the posted speed limit by the use of radar or other electronic devices which measures the speed of moving vehicles; and
WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code Section 627(b) defines an engineering and traffic survey to include consideration of all of the following:
1) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements; 2) Accident Records;
3) Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver; and
WHEREAS, the City of Eastvale has completed a new engineering and traffic survey required under California Vehicle Code Section 22357 and 22358.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Chapter 10.02 of TitlelO to the Eastvale Municipal Code is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
"Sec. 10.02.010. - Findings.
(a) The City Council of the City of Eastvale finds that an engineering and traffic survey has been completed in full compliance with the requirements of the California Vehicle Code and the recommendations in the survey should be implemented. Based upon the review of the survey and related information, the City Council finds the prevailing or 85th percentile speeds of the vehicles are:

No Street Between
85th
Percentile
(mph)
1 58th Street Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 40
2 65th Street Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 44
3 Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 47
4 Hamner Avenue and Wells Spring Street/East City Limit 42 5 68th Street Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 49
6 Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 47
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476

APPENDIX A
Regulations Governing Speed Limits
(Excerpts from the California Vehicle Code)
(Updated January 2022)
477

478
1 Appendix A

RADAR SPEED ZONE SURVEYS

INTRODUCTION

This report presents the results of an Engineer ing and Traffic Survey for establishment of speed limits on city streets as required by Sections 22357 and 22358 of the California Vehicle Code. The review included radar surveys of prevailing vehi cle speeds for each roadway segment, recent traffic counts, an analysis of reported traffic co llisions recorded during the specific three-year interval of August 1, 2 019 through July 31, 2022, and a field review of each roadway segment regarding roadway characteristics.

In order to enforce speed limits by radar or ot her electronic devices, a study must be conducted every five years. Section 40802 of the California Vehicle Code defines a speed limit enforced by radar and “….which speed limit is not justified by an engineer ing and traffic survey conducted within five years prior to the da te of the alleged violation…” c onstitutes a speed trap, unless the following criteria are met:

If officers have completed specialized tr aining courses that are approved by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards Training, the time span between studies can be extended to seven years.

If after seven years, “ …a registered engine er evaluates the secti on of the highway and determines that no significant changes in ro adway or traffic condi tions have occurred, including, but not limited to, changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume…” the time span between studies can be extended to 14 years.

Since speed traps are illegal, th e lack of an adequate study effe ctively precludes the police from using radar enforcement. Through adoption of this Engineering and Traffic Survey, the police department will be able to enforce posted speed limits with radar equipment. 479
2 Appendix A

REGULATIONS GOVERNING SPEED LIMITS

Under California law, the max imum speed limit for any passenger vehicle is 65 miles per hour (mph). All other speed limits are called prima facie limits which “on the face of it”, are safe and prudent under normal conditions. Certain prima facie limits are established by law and include the 25 mph limit in business and residential districts; the 15 mph limit in alleys, at blind intersections and blind railroad grade crossings; and a part-time 25 mph limit in school zones when children are going to and from school.

Intermediate speed limits between 25 and 65 mph ma y be established by local authorities based on engineering and traffic surveys. Such survey s include the analysis of roadway conditions, collision records, and the prevailing speed of prudent drivers using the highway under study. If speed limits are established below what the majority of drivers consider reasonable, they are often not obeyed and consequently, are difficult to enforce. Those dr ivers who do not comply with posted reasonable speed limits are, conversely, subject to equitable enforcement action.

The California Vehicle Code provides that the use of radar to enforce speed limits, which have not been based on an engineering and traffic survey within the preceding five years, constitutes a “speed trap”. Since speed traps are also proh ibited by the code, lack of the required study effectively prohibits local agencies from using radar enforcement.

APPLICABLE CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE SECTIONS
Increase of Local Limits

22357. Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that a speed greater than 25 miles per hour would facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic and would be reasonable and safe upon any street other than a state highway otherwise subject to a prima facie limit of 25 miles per hour, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie limit of 25 miles per hours, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60 miles per hour or a maximum speed limit of 65 miles per hour, whicheve r is found most appropria te to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic a nd is reasonable and safe. The d eclared prima facie or maximum speed limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street and shall not thereafter be revised except upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey.

The provisions of this section shall not apply in respect to any 25-mile-per-hour prima facie limit, which is applicable when passing a school building or the grounds thereof.

Decrease of Local Limits

22358. Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the limit of 65 miles per hour is more than is reasonable or safe upon any portion of any street other than a state highway where the limit of 65 miles per hour is applicable, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 60, 55, 50, 45, 480
3 Appendix A

40, 35, 30, 25, 20 or 15 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe, which declared prima facie limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street. (This section was modified by Assembly Bill 43 to include “20 or 15” and became effective on January 1, 2022.)

Downward Speed Zoning

22358.5 It is the intent of the Legislature that phy sical conditions such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would not require special downward speed zoning, as the basic rule of Section 22350 is sufficient regulation as to such conditions.

Maintaining Existing Speed Limit

22358.8. (a) If a local authority, after completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, the lo cal authority may, by ordinance, retain the current speed limit or restore the immediately prior speed limit if that speed limit was established with an engineering and traffic survey and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since the completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit. (b) This section does not authorize a speed limit to be reduced by any more than 5 mph from the current speed limit nor below the immediately prior speed limit. (c) A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.

Note: Section 22358.8 was added to the CVC by A ssembly Bill 43, and became effective on January 1, 2022.

Business Activity District Prima Facie Speed Limit

22358.9. (a) (1) Notwithstanding any other law, a local authority may, by ordinance, determine and declare a 25 or 20 miles per hour prima facie speed limit on a highway contiguous to a business activity district when posted with a sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 or 20 miles per hour. (2) The prima facie limits established under paragraph (1) apply only to highways that meet all of the following conditions:
(A) A maximum of four traffic lanes.
(B) A maximum posted 30 miles pe r hour prima facie speed li mit immediately prior to and after the business activity district, if establishing a 25 miles per hour speed limit. (C) A maximum posted 25 miles pe r hour prima facie speed li mit immediately prior to and after the business activity district, if establishing a 20 miles per hour speed limit. (b) As used in this section, a “business activity di strict” is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto that includes central or ne ighborhood downtowns, urba n villages, or zoning designations that prioritize commercial land uses at the downtown or neighborhood scale and meets at least three of the following requirements in paragraphs (1) to (4), inclusive:
(1) No less than 50 percent of the contiguous property fronting the highway consists of retail 481
4 Appendix A

or dining commercial uses, including outdoor dining, that open dir ectly onto sidewalks adjacent to the highway.
(2) Parking, including parallel, diagonal, or perpendicular spaces alongside the highway. (3) Traffic control signals or stop signs regulating traffic flow on the highway, located at intervals of no more than 600 feet.
(4) Marked crosswalks not controlled by a traffic control device. (c) A local authority shall not declare a prima facie speed limit under this section on a portion of highway where the local authority has already lowered the speed limit as permitted under Sections 22358.7 and 22358.8.
(d) A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.

Note: Section 22358.9 was added to the CVC by A ssembly Bill 43, and became effective on January 1, 2022. Section 22358.7, which is referenced, will not go into effect until 2024, and is, therefore, not included in this document as an applicable CVC section.

Speed Trap

40802. (a) A “speed trap” is either of the following:
(1) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance. (2) A particular section of a highway with a prima facie speed limit provided by this code or by local ordinance pursuant to paragraph (1 ) of subdivision (b) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within five years prior to the date of the alleged viola tion, and enforcement of the spee d limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the sp eed of moving objects. This paragraph does not apply to a local street , road, school zone, senior zone, or business activity district. (This section was modified by Assembly Bill 43 to add “senior zone, or business activity district” and became effective on January 1, 2022.)

(b) (1) For purposes of this section, a local street or road is one th at is functionally classified as “local” on the “California Road System Maps,” that are a pproved by the Federal Highway Administration and maintained by th e Department of Transportation. It may also be defined as a “local street or road” if it primarily provides access to abutting residential property and meets the following three conditions (This section was modified by Assembly Bill 43 regarding “local street or road” with no change to the meaning, and became effective on January 1, 2022.):

(D) Roadway width of not more than 40 feet.
(E) Not more than one-half mile of uninterru pted length. Interruptions shall include official traffic control devices as defined in Section 445. (F) Not more than one traffic lane in each direction.
482
5 Appendix A

(2) For purposes of this section, “school zone” means that area approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign, whil e children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or duri ng the noon recess period. “School zone” also includes the area approaching or passing an y schoolgrounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physic al barrier while the grounds are in used by children if that highway is posted with a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign. (3) For purposes of this section, “senior zone” means that area approaching or passing a senior center building or other facility primarily used by seni or citizens, or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard “SENIOR” warning sign, pursuant to Section 22352. (This section was added by CA AB 43 and became effective on January 1, 2022.)
(4) For purposes of this section, “business ac tivity center” means a section of highway described in subdivision (b) of Section 22358.9 in which a standard 25 miles per hour or 20 miles per hour speed limit ahs been posted pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of that section. (This section was added by CA AB 43 and became effective on January 1, 2022.)

(c) (1) When all of the following criteria are met, paragraph (2 ) of this subdivision shall be applicable and subdivision (a) shall not be applicable:

(A) When radar is used, the arresting officer has successfully completed a radar operator course of not less than 24 hours on the use of police traffic radar, and the course was approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training. (B) When laser or any other electronic device is used to measure the speed of moving objects, the arresting officer has successf ully completed the training required in subparagraph (A) and an addi tional training c ourse of not less than two hours approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training. (C) (i) The prosecution proved that the arresting officer complied with subparagraphs (A) and (B) and that an engineering and traffic survey has been conducted in accordance with subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2). The prosecution proved that, prior to issuing the notice to appear, the arresting officer es tablished that the radar, laser, or other electronic device conformed to the requirements of subparagraph (D). (ii) The prosecution proved the speed of the accused was unsafe for the conditions present at the time of alle ged violation unless the cita tion was for a violation of Section 22349, 22356 or 22406.
(D) The radar, laser, or other electronic device used to measure the speed of the accused meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within the three years prior to the date of the alleged violation by an independent certified laser or radar repair and testing or calibration facility.
(2) A “speed trap” is either of the following:
(A) A particular section of a highway measured as to di stance and with boundaries 483
6 Appendix A

marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance. (B) (i) A particular section of highway or st ate highway with a pr ima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within one of the following time periods, prio r to the date of th e alleged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects:
(I) Except as specified in subclause (II), seven years. (II) If an engineering and traffic survey was conducted more than seven years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and a registered engineer evaluates the section of the highway and determines that no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred, including, but not limited to, changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume, 14 years. (ii) This subparagraph does not apply to local street, road or school zone, senior zone or business activity district. (This section was modified by Assembly Bill 43 to add “senior zone, or business activity district” and became effective on January 1, 2022.)

Speed Trap Evidence.

40803. (a) No evidence as to the speed of a vehicle upon a highway shall be admitted in any court upon the trial of any person in any prosecution under this code upon a charge involving the speed of a vehicle when the evidence is based upon or obtained from or by the maintenance or use of a speed trap
(b) In any prosecution under this code of a charge involving the speed of a vehicle, where enforcement involves the use of radar or othe r electronic devices which measure the speed of moving objects, the prosecution shall establish, as part of its prima facie case, that the evidence or testimony presented is not based upon a speed trap as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 40802.
(c) When a traffic and engineering survey is required pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 40802, evidence that a traffic and engineering survey has been conducted within five years of the date of the a lleged violation or evidence th at the offense was committed on a local street or road as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 40802 shall constitute a prima facie case that the evidence or te stimony is not based upon a speed trap as defined in subdivision (b) 40802.

Engineering and Traffic Survey

627. (a) “Engineering and tr affic survey” as used in this Co de, means a survey of highway and traffic conditions in accordance with me thods determined by the Department of Transportation for use by the state and local authorities.

(b) An engineering and traffic survey shall include, among other re quirements deemed necessary by the department, consideration of all the following 484
7 Appendix A

1) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements. 2) Collision records.
3) Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver. (c) When conducting an engineering and traffic su rvey, local authorities, in addition to the factors set forth in paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive, of subdivision (b) may consider all of the following:
(1) Residential density, if any of the following conditions exist on the particular portion of highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district:
(A) Upon one side of the highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occ upied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.
(B) Upon both sides of the highway, collectivel y, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.
(C) The portion of highway is longer than one- quarter of a mile but has the ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway described in either subparagraph (A) or (B).
(2) Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, with increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups including children, senior s, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused. (This section was modified by Assembly Bill 43 to add the increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups, and became effective on January 1, 2022.)

Business District

235. A “business district: is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto (a) upon one side of which highway, for a distance of 600 feet, 50 percent of more of the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupi ed by buildings in use for busine ss, or (b) upon both sided of which highway, collectively, for a distance of 300 feet, 50 percent or more of the contiguous property fronting thereon is so occupied. A business district ma y be longer than the distance specified in this section if the above ratio of bu ildings in use for busine ss to the length of the highway exists.

Residence District

515. A “residence district” is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district, (a) upon one side of which highway, w ithin a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting th ereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or busine ss structures, or (b) upon bot h sided of which highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling housed or business st ructures. A residence 485
8 Appendix A

district may be longer than one quarter of a mile if the above ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway exists.

Business and Residence District: Determination

240. In determining whether a high way is within a business or re sidence district, the following limitations shall apply and shall qualify the definitions Section 235 and 515:

a) No building shall be counted unless its entr ance faces the highway and the front of the building is within 75 feet of the roadway.

b) Where a highway is physically divided into two or more roadways, only those buildings facing each roadway separately shall be counted for the purpose of determining whether the roadway is within a district.

c) All churches, apartments, hotels, multiple dwelling houses, clubs and public buildings, other than schools, shall be deemed to be business structures.

d) A highway or portion of a highway shall not be deemed to be within a district regardless of the number of buildings upon the contiguous property if there is no right of access to the highway by vehicles from the contiguous property.

Maximum Speed Limit

22349. Except as provided in Section 22356, no person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than 65 miles per hour.

Basic Speed Law

22350. No person shall drive a vehi cle upon a highway at a speed gr eater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibili ty, the traffic on, and surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property.

Speed Law Violations

22351. (a) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway not in excess of the limits specified in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is lawful unless clearly proved to be in violation of the basic speed law.

(b) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway in excess of the prima facie speed limits in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is prima facie unlawful unless the defendant establishes by competent evidence that the speed in excess of said limits did not constitute a violation of the basic speed law at the time, place and under the conditions then existing.

486
9 Appendix A

Prima Facie Speed Limits

22352. The prima facie limits are as follows and the same shall be applicable unless changed as authorized in this code and, if so changed, only when signs have been erected giving notice thereof:

(a) Fifteen miles per hour:

1) When traversing a railway grade crossing, if during the last 100 feet of the approach to the crossing the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the crossing and of any traffic on the railway for a distance of 400 feet in both directions along such railway. This subdivision does not apply in the case of any railway grade crossing where a human flagman is on duty or a clearly visible electrical mechanical railway crossing signal device is installed but does not then indicate the immediate approach of a railway train or car.

2) When traversing any intersection of highw ays if during the last 100 feet of his approach to the intersection the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the intersection and of any traffi c upon all of the highways entering the intersection for a distance of 100 feet along all such highways, except at an intersection protected by stop signs or yield right- of-way signs or controlled by official traffic control signals.

3) On any alley.

(b) Twenty-five miles per hour:

1) On any highway other than a state highwa y, in any business or residence district unless a different speed is determined by local authority under procedures set forth in this code.

2) When passing a school building or the gr ounds thereof, conti guous to a highway and posted with a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during sc hool hours or during the noon recess period.

Such prima facie limit shall also apply when passing any school grounds which are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign.

3) When passing a senior center or facility primarily used by senior citizens, contiguous to a street othe r than a state highway and posted with a standard “SENIOR” warning sign.

Boundary Line Streets

22359. With respect to boundary line streets and highways where portions thereof are within different jurisdictions, no ordinance adopted under Sections 22357 and 22358 shall be effective as to any such portion until all authorities having juri sdiction of the portions of the street concerned 487
10 Appendix A

have approved the same. This section shall not apply in the case of boundary line streets consisting of separate roadways within different jurisdictions.

Multiple-Lane Highways

22361. On multiple-lane highways w ith two or more separate roadways, different prima facie speed limits may be established for different ro adways under any of the procedures specified in Sections 22354 to 22359, inclusive.

Speed Trap Prohibition

40801. No peace officer or other person shall use a sp eed trap in arresting, or participating or assisting in the arrest of, any person for any alleged violation of this code nor shall any speed trap be used in securing evidence as to the speed of any vehicle for the purpose of an arrest or prosecution under this code.

488

APPENDIX B
Speed Zoning Regulations from
Caltrans California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices And Definitions of Terms
(Updated June 2021)
489

490
1 Appendix B

California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices
(Regarding Speed Limits)
(Updated June 2021)

Section 2B.13 Speed Limit Sign (R2-1)
Support:
00 The setting of speed limits can be controversial and requires a rational and defensible determination to maintain public confidence. Speed limits are normally set near the 85th-percentile speed that statistically represents one standard deviation above the average speed and establishes the upper limit of what is considered reasonable and prudent. As with most laws, speed limits need to depend on the voluntary compliance of the greater majority of motorists. Speed limits cannot be set arbitrarily low, as this would create violators of the majority of drivers and would not command the respect of the public.

Standard:
01 Speed zones (other than statutory speed limits) shall only be established on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) study that has been performed in accordance with traffic engineering practices. The engineering study shall include an analysis of the current speed distribution of free-flowing vehicles.
02 The Speed Limit (R2-1) sign (see Figure 2B-3) shall display the limit established by law, ordinance, regulation, or as adopted by the authorized agency based on the engineering study.

The speed limits displayed shall be in multiples of 5 mph. 03 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs, indicating speed limits for which posting is required by law, shall be located at the points of change from one speed limit to another. 04 At the downstream end of the section to which a speed limit applies, a Speed Limit sign showing the next speed limit shall be installed. Additional Speed Limit signs shall be installed beyond major intersections and at other locations where it is necessary to remind road users of the speed limit that is applicable.
05 Speed Limit signs indicating the statutory speed limits shall be installed at entrances to the State and, where appropriate, at jurisdictional boundaries in urban areas.

Support:
06 In general, the maximum speed limits applicable to rural and urban roads are established:

A. Statutorily – a maximum speed limit applicable to a particular class of road, such as freeways or city streets, that is established by State law; or
B. As altered speed zones – based on engineering studies. 07 State statutory limits might restrict the maximum speed limit that can be established on a particular road, notwithstanding what an engineering study might indicate.

Option:
08 If a jurisdiction has a policy of installing Speed Limit signs in accordance with statutory requirements only on the streets that enter a city, neighborhood, or residential area to indicate the speed limit that is applicable to the entire city, neighborhood, or residential area unless otherwise posted, a CITYWIDE (R2-5aP), NEIGHBORHOOD (R2-5bP), or RESIDENTIAL (R2-5cP) plaque may be mounted above the Speed Limit sign and an UNLESS OTHERWISE POSTED (R2-5P) plaque may be mounted below the Speed Limit sign (see
Figure 2B-3).

Guidance:
09 A Reduced Speed Limit Ahead (W3-5 or W3-5a) sign (see Section 2C.38) should be used to inform road users of a reduced speed zone where the speed limit is being reduced by more than 10 491
2 Appendix B

mph, or where engineering judgment indicates the need for advance notice to comply with the posted speed limit ahead.
10 States and local agencies should conduct engineering studies at least once every 5, 7 or 10 years, in compliance with CVC Section 40802 to reevaluate non-statutory speed limits on segments of their roadways that have undergone significant changes since the last review, such as the addition or elimination of parking or driveways, changes in the number of travel lanes, changes in the configuration of bicycle lanes, changes in traffic control signal coordination, or significant changes in traffic volumes.
11 No more than three speed limits should be displayed on any one Speed Limit sign or assembly. 12 When a speed limit within a speed zone is posted, it should be within 5 mph of the 85th- percentile speed of free-flowing traffic.

Standard:
12aWhen a speed limit is to be posted, it shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, except as shown in the two Options below.

Option:

1. The posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed, in compliance with CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5. See Standard below for documentation requirements.

2. For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used. Refer to CVC Section 21400(f).

Standard:
12b If the speed limit to be posted has had the 5 mph reduction applied, then an E&TS shall document in writing the conditions and justification for the lower speed limit and be approved by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer. The reasons for the lower speed limit shall be in compliance with CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5.

Support:
12c The following examples are provided to explain the application of these speed limit criteria:

Example 1. Using Option 1 above and first step is to round down: If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 37 mph, then the speed limit would be established at 35 mph since it is the closest 5 mph increment to the 37 mph speed. As indicated by the option, this 35 mph established speed limit could be reduced by 5 mph to 30 mph if the conditions and justification for using this lower speed limit are documented in the E&TS and approved by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer.

Example 2. Using Option 1 above and first step is to round up: If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 33 mph, then the speed limit would be established at 35 mph since it is the closest 5 mph increment to the 33 mph speed. As indicated by the option, this 35 mph speed limit could be reduced by 5 mph to 30 mph if the conditions and justification for using this lower speed limit are documented in the E&TS and approved by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer.

Example 3. Using Option 2 above and first step is to round up: If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 33 mph, instead of rounding up to 35mph, the speed limit can be established at 30mph, but no further reductions can be applied (which is allowed in the two examples above).

Standard:
12d Examples 1 and 2 for establishing posted speed limits shall apply to engineering and traffic surveys (E&TS) performed on or after July 1, 2009 in accordance with the Department’s Traffic Operations Policy Directive Number 09-04 dated June 29, 2009.

Option:
12e After January 1, 2012, Example 3 may be used to establish speed limits. Refer to CVC 21400(f). 492
3 Appendix B

Support:
12f Any existing E&TS that was performed before July 1, 2009 in accordance with previous traffic control device standards is not required to comply with the new criteria until it is due for reevaluation per the 5, 7 or 10 year criteria.
13 Speed studies for signalized intersection approaches should be taken outside the influence area of the traffic control signal, which is generally considered to be approximately 1/2 mile, to avoid obtaining skewed results for the 85th-percentile speed.

Support:
14 Advance warning signs and other traffic control devices to attract the motorist’s attention to a signalized intersection are usually more effective than a reduced speed limit zone.

Guidance:
15 An advisory speed plaque (see Section 2C.08) mounted below a warning sign should be used to warn road users of an advisory speed for a roadway condition. A Speed Limit sign should not be used for this situation.

Option:
16 Other factors that may be considered when establishing or reevaluating speed limits are the following:

A. Road characteristics, shoulder condition, grade, alignment, and sight distance; B. The pace;
C. Roadside development and environment;
D. Parking practices and pedestrian activity; and
E. Reported crash experience for at least a 12-month period. 17 Two types of Speed Limit signs may be used: one to designate passenger car speeds, including any nighttime information or minimum speed limit that might apply; and the other to show any special speed limits for trucks and other vehicles.
18 A changeable message sign that changes the speed limit for traffic and ambient conditions may be installed provided that the appropriate speed limit is displayed at the proper times. 19 A changeable message sign that displays to approaching drivers the speed at which they are traveling may be installed in conjunction with a Speed Limit sign.

Guidance:
20 If a changeable message sign displaying approach speeds is installed, the legend YOUR SPEED XX MPH or such similar legend should be displayed. The color of the changeable message legend should be a yellow legend on a black background or the reverse of these colors.

Support:
21 Advisory Speed signs and plaques are discussed in Sections 2C.08 and 2C.14. Temporary Traffic Control Zone Speed signs are discussed in Part 6. The WORK ZONE (G20-5aP) plaque intended for installation above a Speed Limit sign is discussed in Section 6F.12. School Speed Limit signs are discussed in Section 7B.15.
22 Speed limits in California are governed by the California Vehicle Code (CVC), Sections 22348 through 22413; also, pertinent sections are found in Sections 627 and 40802 and others referenced in this section. See Section 1A.11 for information regarding this publication. 23 Refer to Part 6, Section 6C.01 for speed limit signs in temporary traffic control zones. Refer to Part 7 for speed limit signs in school areas.

Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS)
Support:

CVC Section 627 defines the term “Engineering and traffic survey” and lists its requirements.

Standard:
493
4 Appendix B

24 An engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) shall include, among other requirements deemed necessary by the department, consideration of all of the following:

A. Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements.

B. Collision records.

C. Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver.

Guidance:
25 The E&TS should contain sufficient information to document that the required three items of CVC Section 627 are provided and that other conditions not readily apparent to a driver are properly identified. 26 Prevailing speeds are determined by a speed zone survey. A speed zone survey should include:

A. The intent of the speed measurements is to determine the actual speed of unimpeded traffic. The speed of traffic should not be altered by concentrated law enforcement, or other means, just prior to, or while taking the speed measurements.

B. Only one person is required for the field work. Speeds should be read directly from a radar or other electronic speed measuring devices; or,
C. Devices, other than radar, capable of accurately distinguishing and measuring the unimpeded speed of free flowing vehicles may be used.

D. A location should be selected where prevailing speeds are representative of the entire speed zone section.

If speeds vary on a given route, more than one speed zone section may be required, with separate measurements for each section. Locations for measurements should be chosen so as to minimize the effects of traffic signals or stop signs.

E. Speed measurements should be taken during off-peak hours between peak traffic periods on weekdays. If there is difficulty in obtaining the desired quantity, speed measurements may be taken during any period with free flowing traffic.

F. The weather should be fair (dry pavement) with no unusual conditions prevailing.

G. The surveyor and equipment should not affect the traffic speeds. For this reason, an unmarked car is recommended, and the radar speed meter located as inconspicuously as possible.

H. In order for the sample to be representative of the actual traffic flow, the minimum sample should be 100 vehicles in each survey. In no case should the sample contain less than 50 vehicles.

I. Short speed zones of less than 0.5 mile should be avoided, except in transition areas.

J. Speed zone changes should be coordinated with changes in roadway conditions or roadside development.

K. Speed zoning should be in 10 mph increments except in urban areas where 5 mph increments are preferable.

L. Speed zoning should be coordinated with adjacent jurisdictions.

Support:
27 Physical conditions such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to the driver, in the absence of other factors, would not require special downward speed zoning. Refer to CVC 22358.5.

Option:
28 When qualifying an appropriate speed limit, local authorities may also consider all of the following findings:

A. Residential density, if any of the following conditions exist on the particular portion of highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district:

1. Upon one side of the highway, within 0.25 mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.

2. Upon both sides of the highway, collectively, within a distance of 0.25 mile the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. 494
5 Appendix B

3. The portion of highway is larger than 0.25 mile but has the ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway described in either subparagraph a or b.

B. Pedestrian and bicyclist safety.
29 The following two methods of conducting E&TS may be used to establish speed limits:

1. State Highways - The E&TS for State highways is made under the direction of the Department of Transportation’s District Traffic Engineer. The data includes:
a. One copy of the Example of Speed Zone Survey Sheet (See Figure 2B-101(CA)) showing:
• A north arrow
• Engineer's station or post mileage
• Limits of the proposed zones
• Appropriate notations showing type of roadside development, such as “scattered business,” “solid residential,” etc. Schools adjacent to the highway are shown, but other buildings need not be plotted unless they are a factor in the speed recommendation or the point of termination of a speed zone.
• Collision rates for the zones involved
• Average daily traffic volume
• Location of traffic signals, signs and markings
• If the highway is divided, the limits of zones for each direction of travel • Plotted 85th percentile and pace speeds at location taken showing speed profile b. A report to the District Director that includes:
• The reason for the initiation of speed zone survey.
• Recommendations and supporting reasons.
• The enforcement jurisdictions involved and the recommendations and opinions of those officials. • The stationing or reference post in mileage at the beginning and ending of each proposed zone and any intermediate equations. Location ties must be given to readily identifiable physical features.

2. City and County Through Highways, Arterials, Collector Roads and Local Streets. a. The short method of speed zoning is based on the premise that a reasonable speed limit is one that conforms to the actual behavior of the majority of motorists, and that by measuring motorists' speeds, one will be able to select a speed limit that is both reasonable and effective. Other factors that need to be considered include but are not limited to: the most recent two-year collision record, roadway design speed, safe stopping sight distance, superelevation, shoulder conditions, profile conditions, intersection spacing and offsets, commercial driveway characteristics, and pedestrian traffic in the roadway without sidewalks.
b. Determination of Existing Speed Limits - Figures 2B-103(CA) & 2B-104(CA) show examples of data sheets which may be used to record speed observations. Specific types of vehicles may be tallied by use of letter symbols in appropriate squares.
30 In most situations, the short form for local streets and roads will be adequate; however, the procedure used on State highways may be used at the option of the local agency.

Guidance:
31 The factors justifying a reduction below the 85th percentile speed for the posted speed limit are the same factors mentioned above. Whenever such factors are considered to establish the speed limit, they should be documented on the speed zone survey or the accompanying engineering report. 32 The establishment of a speed limit of more than 5 mph below the 85th percentile speed should be done with great care as studies have shown that establishing a speed limit at less than the 85th percentile generally results in an increase in collision rates; in addition, this may make violators of a disproportionate number of the reasonable majority of drivers.
495
6 Appendix B

Support:
33 Generally, the most decisive evidence of conditions not readily apparent to the driver surface in collision histories.
34 Speed limits are established at or near the 85th percentile speed, which is defined as that speed at or below which 85th percent of the traffic is moving. The 85th percentile speed is often referred to as the critical speed.

Pace speed is defined as the 10 mph increment of speed containing the largest number of vehicles (See Figure 2B-102(CA)). The lower limit of the pace is plotted on the Speed Zone Survey Sheets as an aid in determining the proper zone limits. Speed limits higher than the 85th percentile are not generally considered reasonable and prudent. Speed limits below the 85th percentile do not ordinarily facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and require constant enforcement to maintain compliance. Speed limits established on the basis of the 85th percentile conform to the consensus of those who drive highways as to what speed is reasonable and prudent, and are not dependent on the judgment of one or a few individuals. 35 The majority of drivers comply with the basic speed law. Speed limits set at or near the 85th percentile speed provide law enforcement officers with a limit to cite drivers who will not conform to what the majority considers reasonable and prudent.

Further studies show that establishing a speed limit at less than the 85th percentile (Critical Speed) generally results in an increase in collision rates.

Option:
36 When roadside development results in traffic conflicts and unusual conditions which are not readily apparent to drivers, as indicated in collision records, speed limits somewhat below the 85th percentile may be justified. Concurrence and support of enforcement officials are necessary for the successful operation of a restricted speed zone.

Guidance:
37 Speed zones of less than 0.5 mile and short transition zones should be avoided.

Signs
Standard:
38 The Speed Limit (R2-1) sign shall be used to give notice of a prima facie or maximum speed limit except as provided under Prima Facie Speed Limits in CVC 22352. 39 When used, the TRUCKS, 3 AXLES OR MORE 55 MAXIMUM (R6-3(CA)) sign shall be installed approximately 750 feet following each R2-1 sign.
40 The ALL VEHICLES WHEN TOWING 55 MAXIMUM (R6-4(CA)) sign shall be installed approximately 750 feet following the R6-3(CA) sign.

Guidance:
41 The R6-3(CA) and R6-4(CA) signs should be placed on highway segments where speeds in excess of 55 mph are permitted.

Option:
42 The existing AUTOS WITH TRAILERS, TRUCKS 55 MAXIMUM (R6-1(CA)) sign may remain in place until it is knocked down, damaged, stolen, vandalized, or otherwise reaches the end of its useful life. 43 The local California Highway Patrol office may be consulted to identify highway segments where enforcement is an issue.

On these segments early replacement of existing R6-1(CA) signs may be necessary.

Support:
44 Refer to CVC Section 22406 for types of vehicles subject to the 55 mph maximum speed limit.

Option:
45 The Speed Zone Ahead (R2-4(CA)) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be used to inform the motorist of a reduced speed zone.
496
Standard:
7 Appendix B

46 The R2-4(CA) sign shall always be followed by a Speed Limit (R2-1) sign installed at the beginning of the zone where the reduced speed limit applies.
47 The End Speed Limit (R3(CA)) sign shall only be used to mark the end of a speed zone. 48 The R3(CA) sign shall not be used at a transition into a change in speed limits within a reduced zone.

Option:
49 The R3(CA) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be used with the TRUCK (M4-4) plaque to mark the end of truck speed zones on descending grades.

Standard:
50 Speed limit signs shall be placed at the beginning of all restricted speed zones.

Option:
51 Where speed zones are longer than 1 mile, intermediate signs may be placed at approximate 1 mile intervals. For three or more lanes in each direction, dual installation may be used.

Standard:
52 The Speed Limit (R2-1) and End Speed Limit (R3(CA)) signs, as appropriate shall be placed at the end of all restricted speed zones.
53 Freeways with 65 mph and those segments where a speed limit of 70 mph has been approved by the Department of Transportation, with approval by the California Highway Patrol, shall be posted as follows:
• At the segment entrance, R2-1 signs shall be installed right of traffic off of the right shoulder. • R2-1 signs shall also be installed off of the right shoulder only, throughout the segment, at a maximum of 25 mile intervals.

Option:
• The 25 mile interval may be modified to include locations following entrance ramps.

Standard:
• The R6-3(CA) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) shall be installed approximately 750 feet following each R2-1 sign, both at the beginning and throughout each 60, 65 or 70 mph segment. • The R6-4(CA) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) shall be installed approximately 750 feet following each R6-3(CA) sign.

Option:
• The SLOWER TRAFFIC KEEP RIGHT (R4-3) signs may be installed at locations where there is a tendency of the motorists to drive in the left-hand lane(s) below the normal speed of traffic.

Standard:
• Signs shall be placed in protected locations.
• At the end of the 70/65 mph segment, R2-1 signs shall be installed off of the right shoulder. 54 Freeway segments where a 55 mph speed limit has been approved by the Department of Transportation, with the approval of the California Highway Patrol, shall be posted as follows:
• The beginning of the segment shall be posted with an R2-1 sign installed on the right shoulder and left shoulder where the median is of sufficient width to permit sign maintenance without lane closures.

Guidance:
• Subsequent signs should then be posted on the right shoulder, on approximate 3 mile intervals, with no more than 3 interchanges between signs.
• At the end of the segment, an R2-1 sign with the appropriate number for the next speed limit should be posted on the right shoulder.
55 Conventional highways with 55 mph speed limits should be posted as follows:
497
Standard:
8 Appendix B

• The beginning of the segment shall be posted with an R2-1 sign installed on the right shoulder.

Guidance:
• Subsequent signs should then be posted on approximate 5 to 10 mile intervals and immediately after locations where significant volumes of traffic enter the segment. • At the end of the segment, an R2-1 sign with the appropriate number for the next speed limit should be posted on the right shoulder.

Conventional highways with 65 mph speed limits should be posted as follows:
• The beginning of the segment should be posted with an R2-1 sign installed on the right shoulder. • Subsequent signs should then be posted at 5 to 10 mile intervals and after locations where significant volumes of traffic enter the segment.
• At the end of the segment, an R2-1 sign with the appropriate number for the next speed limit should be posted on the right shoulder.

Option:
56 Pavement markings with appropriate numerals (see Section 3B.21) may be used to supplement speed limit signs.

Standard:
57 The R2-1 and R6-3(CA) and R6-4(CA) signs gi ving maximum statewide speed limits for various types of vehicles shall be installed on all State highways near the points of entrance into California.

Guidance:
58 The R2-1 and R6-3(CA) and R6-4(CA) signs should be placed in a location to be most effectively viewed by the approaching motorists.

Standard:
59 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs shall be installed throughout segments of freeway with posted speed limits of 65 mph or 70 mph at a maximum of 25 mile intervals.

Option:
60 The 25 mile interval may be modified to include locations following entrance ramps.

Standard:
61 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs shall be installed throughout segments of conventional highways with a posted speed limit of 65 mph at 5 mile to 10 mile intervals. 62 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs shall be installed throughout segments of freeway with a posted speed limit of 55 mph at approximately 3 mile intervals with no more than 3 interchanges between signs. 63 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs shall be installed throughout segments of conventional highways with a posted speed limit of 55 mph at 5 mile to 10 mile intervals.

Speed Enforced Signs
Option:
64 The SPEED ENFORCED BY RADAR (R48(CA)) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be used where the California Highway Patrol has received authority to use radar and requests such signs.

Guidance:
65 One sign should be used in each direction at the beginning of the segment of roadway, and at intervening major route intersections, where radar enforcement is in effect.

Support:
66 The R48(CA) sign is a stand-alone sign intended to alert motorists that speed is enforced by radar on a particular segment of roadway.

Option:
67 The RADAR ENFORCED (R48-1(CA)) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be used in combination with the Speed Limit (R2-1) sign on any roadway where law enforcement has the authority to use radar. 498
9 Appendix B

Guidance:
68 When used, the R48-1(CA) sign should be placed below the R2-1 sign, at the beginning of the segment of roadway and at intervening major intersections, where radar enforcement is in effect.

Option:
69 The SPEED ENFORCED BY AIRCRAFT (R48-2(CA)) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be placed, when requested by the California Highway Patrol, on sections of highway regularly patrolled by aircraft.

Standard:
70 The R48-2(CA) sign shall be used for both directions of travel.

Guidance:
71 The R48-2(CA) sign should be placed at the beginning of the section and spaced at 25 mile intervals. See Figure 3B-105(CA).

Vehicle Speed Feedback Signs
Option:
72 A Vehicle Speed Feedback sign that displays to approaching drivers the speed at which they are traveling may be installed in conjunction with a Speed Limit (R2-1) sign.

Standard:
73 If a Vehicle Speed Feedback sign displaying approach speeds is installed, the legend shall be YOUR SPEED XX. The numerals displaying the speed shall be white, yellow, yellow-green or amber color on black background. When activated, lights shall be steady-burn conforming to the provisions of CVC Sections 21466 and 21466.5. Vehicle Speed Feedback signs shall not alternatively be operated as variable speed limit signs.

Guidance:
74 To the degree practical, numerals for displaying approach speeds should be similar font and size as numerals on the corresponding Speed Limit (R2-1) sign.

Option:
75 When used, the Vehicle Speed Feedback sign may be mounted on either a separate support or on the same support as the Speed Limit (R2-1) sign.
76 In lieu of lights, legend may be retroreflective film for flip-disk systems. 77 The legend YOUR SPEED may be white on black plaque located above the changeable speed display.

Support:
78 Driver comprehension may improve when the Vehicle Speed Feedback Sign is mounted on the same support below the Speed Limit (R2-1) sign.
79 Vehicle Speed Feedback Signs are appropriate for use with advisory speed signs and with temporary signs in temporary traffic control zones.

Basic Speed Law and Prima Facie Speed Limits – See CVC 22350 & 22352 Support:
80 The basic speed law states “No person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property.” Standard:
81 Prima facie speed limits are specific limits and shall apply unless changed based upon an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) and signs are posted that display the new speed limit.

Option:
82 Prima facie speed limits may be preempted by the basic speed law, when roadway, traffic or weather conditions warrant a lower speed.
499
10 Appendix B

Use of Metric System Designations – See CVC 21351.3
Option:
83 Dual units for speed limits on signs may be placed on local streets and roads in both Metric and English units.

Guidance:
84 If used, dual unit speed limits should be rounded to the nearest 10 km/h for Metric and 5 mph for English units for posting on signs on local streets and roads.

Support:
85 Refer to AASHTO’s Traffic Engineering Metric Conversion Factors. See Section 1A.11 for information regarding this publication.

Standard:
86 Metric speed limits shall not be placed on State highways. For use in this California MUTCD, 70 mph shall be shown as a metric equivalent of 110 km/h, neither of which shall be used on any local street or road.

Legal Authority for Establishing Speed Limits
Support:
87 Delegation of legal authority to set speed limits on State highways is given to Department of Transportation’s District Directors. The District Director of each transportation district is authorized to issue orders regulating the speed of traffic, up to 65 mph on State highways. The Director of the Department of Transportation retains the authority to approve variable, minimum, and maximum speeds up to 70 mph on State freeways.

Standard:
88 The speed limits shown in Table 2B-101(CA) shall apply, unless changed upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS).

Option:
89 The speed limits shown in Table 2B-102(CA) may apply, unless changed upon E&TS.

Variable Speed Limits on Freeways - See CVC 22355
Option:
90 The following speed limits may apply:
• Whenever the Department of Transportation determines based upon an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) that the safe and orderly movement of traffic upon any freeway segment will be facilitated by the establishment of variable speed limits.
• The Department may erect, regulate, and control signs upon the state highway which is a freeway, or any portion thereof, which, if used, signs shall be designed to permit display of different speeds at various times of the day or night.
• Such signs need not conform to the standards & specifications per CVC 21400, but if used, shall be of sufficient size and clarity to give adequate notice of the applicable speed limit.

Minimum Speed Limits on State Highways - See CVC 22400
Option:
91 The following speed limits may apply:
• Whenever the Department of Transportation determines based upon an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) that slow speeds on any part of a state highway consistently impede the normal and reasonable movement of traffic, the Department may determine and declare a minimum speed limit. Appropriate signs giving notice shall then be installed on that segment.
• A motorist can be cited for stopping or impeding the normal and reasonable movement of traffic unless the stop is necessary for safe operation and in compliance with the law. 500
11 Appendix B

Speed Traps
Support:
92 Refer to CVC 40802 for Speed Traps.

Standard:
93 A speed trap shall not apply to a local street, road, or school zone. 94 A section of highway shall be defined as a speed trap if the prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) within five years, and the enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects. 95 This time provision shall be extended to seven years when using radar and all of the following criteria are met:
• The arresting officer has successfully completed a minimum of 24 hours of certified radar operator course training.
• The radar used to measure the speed meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic Highway Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within three years of the alleged violation.
96 This time provision shall be extended to seven years when using laser or other electronic device (other than radar) and all of the following criteria are met:
• The arresting officer has successfully completed a minimum of 24 hours of certified radar operator course training.
• The arresting officer has successfully completed a minimum of 2 hours of additional approved certified training.
• The radar used to measure the speed meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic Highway Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within three years of the alleged violation.

Option:
97 This time provision for an E&TS may be extended to ten years when all of the above conditions are met and no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred, including changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume as determined by a registered engineer.

Truck Speed Zone on Descending Grades
Guidance:
98 Highway descending grades, if used for posting TRUCK Speed Limit signs (R2-1 and M4-4) for trucks travelling downhill, should have recorded incident history of runaway commercial vehicles. Descending grades shorter than 1 mile should be avoided for posting signs because deceleration of vehicles due to braking action can generally provide sufficient control on descending grades of less than 1 mile.

Support:
99 To establish a downhill truck speed limit, a physical profile showing length and gradient and a downhill speed profile for three or more axle commercial vehicles with a gross rating of 10,000 lbs. or more will be provided.

Standard:
100 Speed profiles for truck speed limits shall be prepared on the same form as other speed surveys.

An analysis of collisions involving trucks shall be prepared.

Guidance:
101 Posted speeds should be on the low side of the scale, generally within the pace of loaded commercial vehicles.

Standard:
102 If warranted, the Department of Transportation’s District Director shall issue a standard speed zone order.
501
12 Appendix B

Support:
103 Posting of the regulation will be by placement of a standard 36 x 45 inch Speed Limit (R2-1) sign with a TRUCK (M4-4) plate above.

Standard:
104 A standard End Speed Limit (R3(CA)) sign with TRUCK (M4-4) plate shall be posted at the end of the truck zone when appropriate.

Speed Zones in Temporary Traffic Control Areas
Support:
105 For signing and establishing speed zones in temporary traffic control areas, refer to Section 6C.01 in Part

6. Speed Zones and Traffic Signals
Standard:
106 An agency changing the speed limits within its jurisdiction shall report the speed limit change to the agency operating and maintaining traffic signals within the speed zone no later than 30 days before changing the posted speed limit.

Support:
107 Changing the signal timing and adjusting the advance detector loops based on the revised speed limits can enhance the operations of the traffic signal.
502
13 Appendix B

Definitions of Selected Terms Used in the CA MUTCD

Text Headings

Standard—a statement of required, m andatory, or specific ally prohibitive practice regarding a traffic control device. All Standard statements are labeled, and the text appears in bold type. The verb “shall” is typically used. The verbs “should” and “may” are not used in Standard statements.

Standard statements are sometimes modified by Options.

Guidance—a statement of recommended, but not mandatory, practice in typical situations, with deviations allowed if engineerin g judgment or engineering study indicates the deviation to be appropriate. All Guidance statements are la beled, and the text appears in non-bolded type. The verb “should” is typically used. The verbs “shall” and “may” are not used in Guidance statements.

Guidance statements are sometimes modified by Options.

Option—a statement of practice t hat is a permissive condition and carries no requirement or recommendation. Option statements sometime contain allowable modifications to a Standard or Guidance statement. All Option statements are labeled, and the text appears in non-bolded type.

The verb “may” is typically used. The verbs “shall” and “should” are not used in Option statements.

Support—an informational statement that does not convey any degree of mandate, recommendation, authorization, pr ohibition, or enforceable condit ion. Support statements are labeled, and the text appears in non-bolded type. The verbs “shall,” “should,” and “may” are not used in Support statements.

Words and Phrases

Speed—speed is defined based on the following classifications:
(a) Average Speed —the summation of t he instantaneous or spot-m easured speeds at a specific location of vehicles divided by the number of vehicles observed. (b) Design Speed—a selected speed used to determine the various geometric design features of a roadway.
(c) 85th-Percentile Speed—the speed at or below which 85 percent of the motor vehicles travel.
(d) Operating Speed —a speed at which a typical vehicl e or the overall traffic operates.

Operating speed might be defined with speed values such as the average, pace, or 85th- percentile speeds.
(e) Pace—the 10 mph speed range repr esenting the speeds of th e largest percentage of vehicles in the traffic stream.
503
14 Appendix B

Speed Limit —the maximum (or minimum) speed applic able to a section of highway as established by law or regulation.

Posted Speed Limit—a speed limit determined by law or regulation and displayed on Speed Limit signs.

Speed Zone—a section of highwa y with a speed limit that is established by law or regulation, but which might be different from a legislatively specified statutory speed limit.

Statutory Speed Limit—a speed limit established by legislative action that typically is applicable for a particular class of highways with spec ified design, functional, jurisdictional and/or location characteristics and that is not necessarily displayed on Speed Limit signs.

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) —the average 24 hour volume, being the total volume during a stated period divided by the number of days in that period. Normally, this would be periodic daily traffic volumes over several days, not adjusted for days of the week or seasons of the year.

Bicycle Lane—a portion of a roadway that has been desi gnated for preferential or exclusive use by bicyclists by pavement markings and, if used, signs. See Class II Bikeway.

Business District - A "business district" is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto (a) upon one side of which highway, for a distance of 600 feet, 50 percent or more of the contiguous property fronti ng thereon is occupied by buildings in use for business, or (b) upon both sides of which highway, collectively, for a distance of 300 feet, 50 per cent or more of the contiguous property fronting thereon is so occupied. A business district may be longer than the distances specified in this section if the above ratio of buildings in use for business to the length of the highway exists. Refer to CVC 235.

CVC – California Vehicle Code.

Class II Bikeway (such as a Bike Lane) – Provides a restricted right-of-way designated for the exclusive or semi-exclusive use of bicycles with through travel by motor vehicles or pedestrians prohibited, but with vehicle parking and crossflows by pedestrians and motorists permitted. Refer to California Streets and Highways Code Section 890.4. Refe r to Caltrans’ Highway Design Manual Index 1003.2 for design criteria.

Divided Highway – A highway with separated roadbeds for traffic in opposing directions.

Engineer – a person registered under Cali fornia Professional Engineers Act as a professional engineer, including any of the branches thereof. Refer to Calif ornia Business and Professions Code Section 6706. 63b. Engineering and Traffic Survey – Refer to CVC 627.

Engineering Judgment—the evaluation of availa ble pertinent information, and the application of appropriate principles, experience, education, discretion, provisions, and practices as contained in this Manual and other sources, for the pur pose of deciding upon the applicability, design, operation, or installation of a traffic control device. Engineering judgment shall be 504
15 Appendix B

exercised by an engineer, or by an individual working under the supervi sion of an engineer, through the application of procedures and criteria established by the engineer. Documentation of engineering judgment is not required.

Engineering Study —the comprehensive analysis and evaluation of available pertinent information, and the application of appropriate principles, engin eering judgment, experience, education, discretion, provisions, and practices as contained in th is Manual and other sources, for the purpose of deciding upon t he applicability, design, operation, or installation of a traffic control device. An engineering study shall be performed by an e ngineer, or by an individual working under the supervision of an engineer, through the application of procedures and criteria established by the engineer. An engineering study shall be documented.

Median—the area between two roadways of a divided highway measured from edge of traveled way to edge of traveled way. The median excl udes turn lanes. The median width might be different between intersections, interchanges , and at opposite approaches of the same intersection.

Multi-Lane—more than one lane moving in the same dire ction. A multi-lane street, highway, or roadway has a basic cross-section comprised of two or more through lanes in one or both directions. A multi-lane approach has two or more lanes moving toward the intersection, including turning lanes.

Pedestrian—a person on foot, in a wheelchair, on skate s, or on a skateboard. As per CVC 467, (a) A "pedestrian" is a person who is afoot or who is using any of the following: (1) A means of conveyance propelled by human power other than a bicycle. (2) An electr ic personal assistive mobility device. (b) "Pedestrian" includes a person who is operating a self-propelled wheelchair, motorized tricycle, or motorized quadricycle and, by reason of physical disability, is otherwise unable to move about as a pedestrian, as specified in subdivision(a).

Pedestrian Facilities —a general term denoting improvements and provisions made to accommodate or encourage walking.

Roadway—that portion of a highway im proved, designed, or ordinarily used for vehicular travel and parking lanes, but exclusive of the sidewalk, berm, or shoulder even though such sidewalk, berm, or shoulder is used by persons riding bi cycles or other human-powered vehicles. In the event a highway includes two or more separate roadways, the term roadway as used in this Manual shall refer to any such roadway separately, but not to all such roadways collectively. Refer to CVC 527.

Shared-Use Path (Class I Bikeway) —a bikeway outside the traveled way and physically separated from motorized vehicular traffic by an open space or barrier and either within the highway right-of-way or within an independent alignment. Shared- use paths are also used by pedestrians (including skaters, users of manual and motorized wheelcha irs, and joggers) and other authorized motorized and non-motorized user s. Refer to the Caltrans’ Highway Design Manual Index 1003.1 for design criteria.
505
16 Appendix B

Shoulder – The portion of the highwa y contiguous with the roadway for accommodations of pedestrians, bicyclists, stopped vehicles, for emergency use, and for lateral support of base and surface courses.

Sidewalk—that portion of a str eet between the curb line, or the lateral line of a roadway, and the adjacent property line or on easements of private property that is paved or improved and intended for use by pedestrians. As per CVC 555, "Sidewalk" is that portion of a highway, other than the roadway, set apart by curbs, barriers, markings or other delineation for pedestrian travel.

Traffic Control Device—a sign, signal, marking, or other dev ice used to regulate, warn, or guide traffic, placed on, over, or adjacent to a stree t, highway, private road open to public travel (see definition of private road open to public travel), pedestrian facility, or shared-use path by authority of a public agency or official having jurisdiction, or , in the case of a private road open to public travel (see definition of private road open to public tr avel), by authority of the private owner or private official having jurisdiction.
506

APPENDIX C
Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary Sheets
(Updated September 2022)

507

508
Location: 58th Street
Between: Scholar Way & Hamner Avenue
Survey Date: July 29, 2021
Segment No.: 1
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 m
ph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.60
Adjacent Land Use:

Recomm
ended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recom
mendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group July 1, 2018 - June 30 , 2021
0 Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
1,522
2,586

0.49 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
40 mph
31-40 mph
35 mph

0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Sidewalk on north side only at Scholar Way.

Roadway Geometrics:
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded to 40 mph, then reduced 5mph)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Commen
ts:

Ped/bike safety
Residential
No
35 mph
Recommendation
12/20/2021
509
510
Location: 65th Street
Between: Sumner Avenue & Hamner Avenue
Survey Date: July 22, 2021
Segment No.: 3
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group 85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 45 mph, then reduced 5mph due to ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Comments:
ped/bike safety
Residential
No

0.24, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Sidewalk located next to curb, so vehicular traffic is in close proximity to pedestrians and any bike traffic. Near Cedar Creek Park at Cedar Creek Rd. Rosa Parks Elementary School at Harrison Ave.

Roadway Geometrics:
40 mph
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
3,755
5,300

1.00 2 Lanes Each Direction w/painted median
Secondary
Speed Survey Data
47 mph
39-48 mph
40 mph
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
1 12/21/2021
511
Location: 65th Street
Between: Hamner Avenue & Wells Spring Street/East City Limit Survey Date: July 22, 2021
Segment No.: 4
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Lim
it:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.60
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Lim
it Change:

Recomm
endation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
2,561
1,642

0.31 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
42 mph
30-39 mph
35 mph

0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Roadway Geometrics:
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 40 mph, then reduced 5 m
ph due to ped/bike safety)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Comment
s:
ped/bike safety
Residential
No
35 mph
Recommendation
12/20/2021
512
Location: 68th Street Survey Date: February 10, 2021
Between: Sumner Avenue & Hamner Avenue Segm ent No.: 5
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (m
iles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Lim
it:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.32
Adjacent Land Use:

Recomm
ended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recom
mendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
5,239
5,260

1.00 Single Lane Each Direction
Local
Speed Survey Data
49 mph
39-48 mph
45 mph

0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Sun for westbound direction is very bright in the evening. No bike lanes. Street parking near Harada Park.

Roadway Geometrics:
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer• :

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Comments:

On-street parking, residential density, and ped/bike
safety
Residential
No
45 mph
Recommendation
12/20/2021
513
Location: 68th Street Survey Date: February 10, 2021
Between: Hamner Avenue & East City Lim it Segment No.: 6 Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (m
iles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Lim
it:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:

Recomm
ended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recom
mendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
8,469
2,650

0.50 2 Lanes Each Direction w/painted median
Major
Speed Survey Data
47 mph
39-48 mph
45 mph

0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Road transitions from 2 lanes each direction undivided at Hamner Avenue to 2 lanes undivided at City Limits.

Roadway Geometrics:
85th percentile speed
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Sm
ith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Comments:
trucks present, residential density, and ped/bike safety Residential
No
45 mph
Recommendation
12/20/2021
514
Location: Archibald Avenue Survey Date: February 17, 2021 Between: Bluff Street & Wind River/Grapewin Street Segment No.: 7 Direction of Travel: N
orth/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (m
iles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Lim
it:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:

Recomm
ended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recom
mendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
3 0.14, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
2 NB/SB from Bluff to Baron, 3 NB/SB from Baron or River/Kendra, 3SB & 2NB merge to 1NB River/Kendra to Corbin/Prado Basin, 3SB & 1- 2NB Corbin to Wind River
Roadway Geometrics:

Commen
ts:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential
55 mph
No
85th percentile speed
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
13,631
7,700

1.46 3SB, 2NB w/ Painted Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
57 mph
48-57 mph
55 mph
12/20/2021
515
Location: Archibald Avenue
Between: Wind River/Grapewin Street & Schleisman Road
Survey Date: September 14, 2021
Segment No.: 8
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (m
iles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.29
Adjacent Land Use:

Recom
mended Speed:

Speed Lim
it Change:

Recomme
ndation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
20,934
8,580

1.63 3NB/SB Lanes w/Raised Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
57 mph
48-57 mph
50 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
4 0.14, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Roadway Geometrics:

Comme
nts:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential
50 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 55 mph, then reduced 5 mph due to trucks present and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
516
Location: Archibald Avenue Survey Date: February 18, 2021 Between: Schleisma n Road and Bellegrave/North City Limit Segment No.: 9 Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segm
ent (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 m
ph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range: July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.98
Adjacent Land Use:

Recom
mended Speed:

Speed Lim
it Change:

Recomme
ndation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
22,487
6,010

1.14 3SB, 2NB w/Painted & Raised Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
55 mph
46-55 mph
50 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650
Date
Recommendation
4 0.14, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Speed limit sign n/o 65th St is in poor condition and not regulatory size. 3SB/3NB Lanes at Schleisman merge to 3SB/2NB Lanes at Branding Iron Dr to s/o 65th, 3SB/2NB Lane from n/o 65th to Providence Wy, 2SB/2NB Providence Wy to Limonite, 1SB/1NB from Limonite to NCL.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comme
nts:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential / Commercial-Retail / Light Industrial
50 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(reduced by 5mph from 55mph down to 50 mph, due to trucks present and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
517
Location: Baron Road Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Between: Archibald Avenue & Northernly Term inus Segment No.: 10 Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segm
ent (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 m
ph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.60
Adjacent Land Use:

Recom
mended Speed:

Speed Lim
it Change:

Recomme
ndation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(reduced by 5mph from
40 mph down to 35 mph, due to on-street parking and residential density) Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
369
2,030

0.38 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
40 mph
27-36 mph
35 mph
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650
Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Cul-de-sac near River Road.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comme
nts:
on-street parking and residential density
Residential / Public Facilities / Conservation
35 mph
12/20/2021
518
Location: Bellegrave Avenue Survey Date: February 17, 2021 Between: Sumner Avenue & Ham ner Avenue Segment No.: 11 Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segm
ent (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 m
ph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.78
Adjacent Land Use:

Recom
mended Speed:

Speed Lim
it Change:

Recomme
ndation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
10,629
5,650

1.07 Single Lane Each Direction w/ Painted Median
Major
Speed Survey Data
53 mph
45-54 mph
50 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650
Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
2 0.16, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No bike lanes. No sidewalk on north side. Construction cones along segment from w/o Mill Creek Rd to Hamner Ave on WB direction only.

Houses being built NW of Hamner Ave.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comme
nts:
trucks present
Residential / Undeveloped Property
50 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 55 mph, then reduced another 5mph)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
519
Location: Bellegrave Avenue Survey Date: February 17, 2021 Between: Hamner Avenue & East City Limit Segment No.: 12 Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segm
ent (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 m
ph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:

Recom
mended Speed:

Speed Lim
it Change:

Recomme
ndation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
10,308
2,575

0.49 2 Lanes Each Direction w/painted median
Major
Speed Survey Data
48 mph
39-48 mph
50 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650
Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No bike lanes. 2EB/2WB w/o Homecoming, 1EB/1WB from Homecoming to City Limit.

Roadway Geometrics:

Vertical Curve at I-15.

Comme
nts:
trucks present
High Density Residential / Commercial
50 mph
No
85th percentile speed
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
520
Location: Blossom Way
Between: Harrison Avenue & Sumner Avenue
Survey Date: July 29, 2021
Segment No.: 13
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (m
iles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.60
Adjacent Land Use:

Recom
mended Speed:

Speed Lim
it Change:

Recomme
ndation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
2,497
2,650

0.50 Single Lane Each Direction
Local
Speed Survey Data
37 mph
27-36 mph
30 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No bike lanes. 1EB/1WB lanes.

Roadway Geometrics:

Vertical Curve at I-15.

Comme
nts:
ped/bike safety
High Density Residential / Commercial
30 mph
No
CVC Section 22358.8, which allows retaining the existing speed limit under certain conditions, which are met. New section created by AB 43, effective 1/1/2022. 85th percentile speed limit considered too high due to ped/bike safety
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
521
Location: Cantu-Galleano Ranch Rd
Between: Hamner Avenue to I-15 Freeway
Survey Date: May 19, 2022
Segment No.: 14
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

1.18 Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
August 1, 2019 - July 31, 2022
9 0.88, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
3 EB lanes and 1 EB Auxiliary lane and 2 WB lanes with 1 WB Auxiliary lane between Hamner and Goodman. 3 lanes in each direction between Goodman and I-15 Freeway.

Comments:

Trucks present and ped/bike safety
50 mph
Establishing Speed Limit
85th percentile speed
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
2,323

0.44 3 Lanes Each Direction w/painted Median
Urban Arterial
Speed Survey Data
51 mph
35-44 mph
9/23/2022
Roadway Geometrics:

Painted median between I-15 Freeway and Hamner Ave.
21,256 vpd
Light Industrial and Commercial
522
Location: Chandler Street
Between: Hellman Avenue to Harrison Avenue
Survey Date: July 22, 2021
Segment No.: 15
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Lim
it:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.91
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Lim
it Change:

Recomm
endation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
6,828
8,075

1.53 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Raised & Painted Median
Arterial / Collector
Speed Survey Data
52 mph
41-50 mph
45 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
1 0.16, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Painted Median from Archibald to Harrison. Raised Median from Hellman to Archibald.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comment
s:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential / Commercial Retail
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced 5
mph due to trucks and ped/bike safety)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
523
Location: Citrus Street
Between: Harrison Avenue to Scholar Way
Survey Date: May 19, 2022
Segment No.: 16
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

1.14 Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
August 1, 2019 - July 31, 2022
3 0.17, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
2 EB and 2 WB lanes with bike lanes between Harrison and Scholar.

Comments:

Buffered Bike lane in each direction between Scholar and Cobble Creek. Regular Bike Lane in each direction between Cobble Creek and Harrison Residential
40 mph
Yes, 5 MPH decrease
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 45 mph, then reduced another 5 mph due to ped/bike safety) Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
11,140 vpd
5,238

0.99 2 Lanes Each Direction w/painted Median and Bike Lanes Secondary
Speed Survey Data
47 mph
41-50 mph
45 mph
9/23/2022
Roadway Geometrics:

Painted median between Hamner and Scholar Way.
524
Location: Citrus Street
Between: Scholar Way to Hamner Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 17
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

1.39 Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
2 0.47, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Single Lane Each Direction
Roadway Geometrics:

Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
7,787
2,626

0.50 1 Lane Each Direction w/painted Median
Secondary
Speed Survey Data
47 mph
41-50 mph
45 mph
9/28/2022
525
Location: Fieldmaster Street
Between: Hall Road and Archibald Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 18
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.32
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group No
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 45 mph, then reduced another 5mph)
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
1,616
5,215

0.99 Single Lane Each Direction
Local
Speed Survey Data
43 mph
35-44 mph
40 mph
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Established shoulders, but no bike lanes. Adjacent Halfmoon Park at Cherry Creek Circle.

Roadway Geometrics:

Horizontal Curves.

Comments:
on-street parking and ped/bike safety
Residential
40 mph
12/20/2021
526
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Goodman Avenue Survey Date: June 5, 2018
Between:

Direction of Travel:

Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road & Hamner Avenue
North/South & East/\
Traffic Data
4,800
3,600

0.68 Lane Configuration: 1 Lane NB & 2 Lanes SB and 1 Lane EB/WB; 2-way LT lane Street Classification: Local
Speed Survey Data
85th Percentile: 41 mph
10 mph Pace: 31-40 mph
Posted Speed Limit: Not Posted
Collision History
Date Range: January 1, 2016 - December 31, 2017
Total Collisions: 0
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM): 0
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Very heavy truck traffic making mid-block turns.No bike lanes, but mixed-use path on south & east sides. Parking not allowed, but regular violations. Many peds crossing during shift-change.

Roadway Geometrics:

Straight alignment with S-curve just south of Cantu-Galeano Ranch Rd. 1 SB/WB Lane from north of 90 deg angle to Hamner. Raised median on approach to Cantu-Galeano Ranch Rd.

Comments:

Adjacent Land Use: Mix of retail & big box uses.

Recommendation 35 mph
Speed Limit Change: Yes
Revised Speed Limit: 35 mph
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
�.'-vk Vl-1 Qn-:: 7 /Jo/Zo,ei t I ,_ �11. •' Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date �,,,�� * Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group 0, � Segment #19 527
Location: Hamner Avenue
Between: South City Limit & Schleisman Road
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 20
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.98
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Yes, 10 mph increase
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph due to trucks present, vertical curve and ped/bike safety) Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
18,287
3,295

0.62 3NB, 2-1SB w/Painted Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
52 mph
44-53 mph
50 mph
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
3 0.24, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Roadway Geometrics:

Road narrowing in the southbound direction south of Schleisman Road Comments:
trucks present, vertical curve and ped/bike safety
Residential / Commercial Retail / Recreation
45 mph
12/20/2021
528
Location: Hamner Avenue
Between: Schleisman Road & Limonite Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 21
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.41
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph due to high collision rate, trucks present and ped/bike safety)
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
18,890
5,275

1.00 3 Lanes Each Direction w/Raised & Painted Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
51 mph
42-51 mph
45 mph
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
6 0.29, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Bike Lanes. Painted Median from Riverboat to 65th. Raised Median between 65th Street and Limonite Avenue. Reduction of speed due to crash history.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comments:
high collision rate, trucks present and ped/bike safety Residential / Commercial Retail
45 mph
12/20/2021
529
Location: Hamner Avenue
Between: Limonite Avenue & Bellegrave Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 22
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.91
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
22,223
4,800

0.91 Single Lane Each Direction w/Raised Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
51 mph
42-51 mph
45 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
8 0.36, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
bike lanes. No sidewalk on west side s/o 58th. 2SB/3NB from Limonite to n/o Eastvale Gateway, 1SB/1NB n/o Eastvale Gateway to n/o 58th, 2SB/3NB from n/o 58th to Bellegrave.

Roadway Geometrics:

Roadway width reductions.

Comments:
high driveway density, trucks present and ped/bike safety Residential / Commercial Retail
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph due to high driveway density, trucks present and ped/bike safety)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
530
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Hamner Avenue Survey Date: June 5, 2018
Between:

Direction of Travel:

Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Bellegrave Avenue & Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road
North/South
Traffic Data
19,500
4,400

0.83 Lane Configuration: 3 Lanes NB (EV), 2 Lanes SB (ONT) w/Raised Median Street Classification: Urban Arterial
Speed Survey Data
85th Percentile: 55 mph
10 mph Pace: 45-54 mph
Posted Speed Limit: 50 mph
Collision History
Date Range: January 1, 2016 - December 31, 2017
Total Collisions: 5
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM): 0.42
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No parking, truck route, pedestrian activity on NB sidewalk, no bike lanes Roadway Geometrics:

Straight alignment.

Comments:

Adjacent Land Use: Retail, commercial, big box and undeveloped Recommendation 50 mph
Speed Limit Change: No
Revised Speed Limit: Existing
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
'::h:: l/1'1 �
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650
7 / ls2. l Zac..er'
Date
• Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group r� � �;,- 1T� �
I �,. I ,_ � I
�Fil Segment #23
531
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Hamner Avenue Survey Date: June 5, 2018
Between: Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road & Riverside Drive
Direction of Travel: North/South
Traffic Data
Average Daily Traffic: 17,500
Length of Segment (feet): 6,500
Length of Segment (miles): 1.23
Lane Configuration: 2 Lanes NB, 1 Lane SB w/2-way LT Lane Street Classification: Urban Arterial
Speed Survey Data
85th Percentile: 55 mph
10 mph Pace: 46-55 mph
Posted Speed Limit: Not Posted
Collision History
Date Range: January 1, 2016 - December 31, 2017
Total Collisions: 5
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM): 0.32
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No parking, Class 2 bike lane NB, heavy truck traffic at times Roadway Geometrics:

Straight alignment.

Comments:

Adjacent Land Use: Industrial & undeveloped
Recommendation 50 mph
Speed Limit Change: Yes
Revised Speed Limit: 50 mph (not currently posted)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
�
�� 1-�1 ,6-1- ..., l IV I ?.,(:JI t:; ;!
J} Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
* Contract services provided by lnteiwest Consulting Group 0, <>11""7 Segment #24 532
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Hamner Avenue Survey Date: June 5. 2018
Between: Riverside Drive & Philadelphia Street
Direction of Travel: North/South
Traffic Data
Average Daily Traffic: 23,400
Length of Segment (feet): 5,200
Length of Segment (miles): 0.99
Lane Configuration: 2 Lanes Each Direction w/ 2-way LT Lane Street Classification: Urban Arterial
Speed Survey Data
85th Percentile: 53 mph
10 mph Pace: 41-50 mph
Posted Speed Limit: Not Posted
Collision History
Date Range: January 1, 2016- December 31, 2017
Total Collisions: 1
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM): 0.06
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Some sections do not have curb & gutter. Segments of sidewalk missing. Heavy truck activity.

No bike lanes.

Roadway Geometrics:

Straight alignment. North of SR-60 WB Ramps, 3 Lanes Each Direction w/Raised Median Comments:

Adjacent Land Use: Industrial, commercial & undeveloped land Recommendation 50 mph
Speed Limit Change: Yes
Revised Speed Limit: 50 mph (not currently posted)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
�
�Wlµt- 1 I I o l 2-v I f3 r ' .. .,o �, I
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
� * Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Segment#25 533
Location: Harrison Avenue
Between: Chandler Street & Schleisman Road
Survey Date: February 18, 2021
Segment No.: 26
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
5,333
5,266

1.00 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted Median
Collector
Speed Survey Data
50 mph
42-51 mph
45 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No bike lanes. Moderately heavy traffic midday.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comments:
ped/bike safety
Residential
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(reduced by 5mph from 50 mph down to 45 mph, due to trucks present and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
534
Location: Harrison Avenue
Between: Schleisman Road & Blossom Way
Survey Date: July 29, 2021
Segment No.: 27
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Lim
it:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Lim
it Change:

Recomm
endation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced 5
mph due to trucks and ped/bike safety)
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
8,461
7,080

1.34 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted Median
Collector
Speed Survey Data
47 mph
38-47 mph
45 mph
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No bike lanes. Road ends 500 ft n/o Blossom. Rosa Parks Elementary, Ramirez Intermediate, Eastvale Community Center.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comments:

Trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential
45 mph
12/20/2021
535
Location: Hellman Avenue
Between: River Road & Chandler Street
Survey Date: February 18, 2021
Segment No.: 28
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.32
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
6,324
5,100

0.97 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
56 mph
47-56 mph
50 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 20210
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Roadway not fully improved without shoulders or curb and gutter. 1WB/1EB lanes. Roadway easily drives 60 mph.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comments:
trucks present
Residential
50 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 55 mph, then reduced another 5mph due to trucks present) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
536
Location: Hellman Avenue
Between: Chandler Street & Limonite Avenue
Survey Date: February 18, 2021
Segment No.: 29
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
10,594
8,120

1.54 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted Median
Collector
Speed Survey Data
55 mph
46-55 mph
50 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
3 0.27, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Mixed with residential improvements and lack of fully improved street sections. 1SB/1NB n/o Chandler to Outback. 1SB/2NB n/o Outback to Schleisman.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comments:
trucks present
Residential
50 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(reduced by 5mph from 55 mph down to 50 mph, due to trucks present) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
537
Location: Hellman Avenue
Between: Limonite Avenue & North City Limit
Survey Date: April 21, 2021
Segment No.: 30
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

0.91 Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
7,317
1,070

0.20 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Raised Median
Collector
Speed Survey Data
42 mph
33-42 mph
N/A
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No bike lanes, heavy truck traffic, industrial buildings on west side, industrial building and vacant land, under development, on east side.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comments:

Heavy truck traffic
Industrial
35 mph
Establishing Speed Limit
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(reduced by 5 mph from 40 mph down to 35 mph, due to heavy truck traffic and pedestrian/bicycle safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
538
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Limonite Avenue Survey Date: June 5, 2018
Between: Archibald Avenue & Sumner Avenue
Direction of Travel: East/West
Traffic Data
Average Daily Traffic: 22,300
Length of Segment (feet): 5,300
Length of Segment (miles): 1.00
Lane Configuration: 2 or 3 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted or Raised Median Street Classification: Urban Arterial
Speed Survey Data
85th Percentile: 53mph
10 mph Pace: 45-54 mph
Posted Speed Limit: 45mph
Collision History
Date Range: January 1, 2016 - December 31, 2017
Total Collisions: 8
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM): 0.49
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Sections of missing sidewalk, sections without curb & gutter, no bike lanes, pedestrian activity.

Roadway Geometrics:

Straight alignment. 2 EB/WB Lanes East of Archibald
Comments:

Nearby schools and parks accessed using Limonite.

Adjacent Land Use: Residential & undeveloped land
Recommendation 50 mph
Speed Limit Change: Yes
Revised Speed Limit: 50 mph
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

C
;i,-
1Y
H!lt:t s
"-t.t,-...VV1P1-. 7/fot2at't3 �I Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 165 0 Date (, • Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group or Segment#31 539
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Limonite Avenue Survey Date: June 5, 2018
Between: Sumner Avenue & East City Limit
Direction of Travel: East/West
Traffic Data
Average Daily Traffic: 29,400
Length of Segment (feet): 8,100
Length of Segment (miles): 1.53
Lane Configuration: 2 or 3 Lanes Each Direction w/ painted or raised median Street Classification: Urban Arterial
Speed Survey Data
85th Percentile: 52 mph
10 mph Pace: 44-53 mph
Posted Speed Limit: 45 mph
Collision History
Date Range: January 1, 2016- December 31, 2017
Total Collisions: 35
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM): 1.07
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Segments of missing sidewalk, heavy pedestrian usage around transit, fast food & crossing maior streets. No bike lane. No oarkina allowed.

Roadway Geometrics:

Straight alignment w/vertical curb at 1-15. 2 EB/WB Lanes West of Mulan St. to West of Hamner Comments:

Adjacent Land Use: Retail and residential
Recommendation 45 mph
Speed Limit Change: No
Revised Speed Limit: 45 mph
� Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
6'�) � VVI 4:b 7/10)"2-01e I I ll:IO �)!,

1. #
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
�,�� * Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Segment#32 540
Location: Mission Boulevard
Between: S Milliken Avenue & Ontario Freeway (I-15)
Survey Date: February 18, 2021
Segment No.: 33
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.86
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
January 1, 2018 - December 31, 2020
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No bike lanes nor sidewalks. 55 mph EB sign east and 55mph WB sign west of City Limits. Currently posted as 60mph east of S Milliken.

Roadway Geometrics:

Horizontal Curve between S Milliken Ave and Cornerstone Drive.

Comments:
trucks present
Commercial
55 mph
Establishing Speed Limit
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 60 mph, then reduced another 5mph)
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
19,234
2,620

0.50 2 Lanes Each Direction w/2 Lanes on vertical curve to Milliken Arterial
Speed Survey Data
59 mph
49-58 mph
N/A
12/20/2021
541
Location: Orange Street
Between: Sumner Avenue & Scholar Way
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 34
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.6
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
1,027
2,630

0.50 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
45 mph
36-45 mph
30 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Student/Pedestrian Activity. Eastvale Elementary to the north & River Heights Intermediate to the south. Reduction of speed due to crash history.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comments:
high collision rate, on-street parking, and ped/bike safety Residential
30 mph
No
CVC Section 22358.8, which allows retaining the existing speed limit under certain conditions, which are met. New section added to CVC by SB 43, effective 1/1/2022. 85th percentile speed considered too high due to high collision rate, on-street parking, and ped/bike safety Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
542
Location: Prairie Smoke Road
Between: Hellman Avenue & Whitewall Road
Survey Date: February 18, 2021
Segment No.: 35
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.60
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
1,129
1,380

0.26 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
42 mph
31-40 mph
35 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Single Lane Each Direction from Hellman to Whitewall.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comments:
residential density and ped/bike safety
Residential
35 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 40 mph, then reduced another 5mph due to residential density and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
543
Location: River Road
Between: Hellman Avenue & Archibald Avenue
Survey Date: September 14, 2021
Segment No.: 36
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Lim
it:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.32
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Lim
it Change:

Recomm
endation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
7,806
3,970

0.75 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted Median
Collector
Speed Survey Data
49 mph
41-50 mph
40 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
2 0.31, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Local business generate large vehicle traffic. Single Lane Each Direction from Hellman to Hall. 2 Lanes Each Direction from Hall to Archibald.

Agricultural land west of Hall.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comment
s:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential / Agricultural
40 mph
No
CVC Section 22358.8, which allows retaining the existing speed limit under certain conditions, which are met. Created by new AB 43, effective 1/1/2022. 85th percentile speed considered too high due to trucks present and ped/bike safety.

Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
544
Location: Riverboat Drive
Between: Massy Harris Way & Wells Springs Street
Survey Date: February 18, 2021
Segment No.: 37
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.32
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
735
3,500

0.66 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
44 mph
35-44 mph
40 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Pedestrians present. 1EB/1WB lane. Turnaround area w/o Massy Harris.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comments:
on-street parking and ped/bike safety
Residential / Commercial
40 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 45 mph, then reduced another 5mph)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
545
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Riverside Drive Survey Date: June 5, 2018
Between: Hamner Avenue & East City Limit
Direction of Travel: East/West
Traffic Data
Average Daily Traffic: 9,900
Length of Segment (feet): 2,300
Length of Segment (miles): 0.44
Lane Configuration: 2 Lanes Each Direction w/2-way LT lane Street Classification: Secondary
Speed Survey Data
85th Percentile: 47mph
10 mph Pace: 38-47 mph
Posted Speed Limit: 50 mph
Collision History
Date Range: January 1, 2016-December 31, 2017
Total Collisions: 0
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM): 0
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Sections of missing sidewalk, posted No Parking, but illegal parking - large trucks park on soft shoulder on north side, heavy truck use, no bike lanes
Roadway Geometrics:

Alignment varies, with straight sections, but mostly curved.

Comments:

Posted 55 mph west of Hamner in Ontario.

Adjacent Land Use: Industrial & undeveloped land
Recommendation 45 mph
Speed Limit Change: Yes
Revised Speed Limit: 45
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
� '--t,,t,_ 11--- j,,__ 7µ0/Z1.Jtt8 I 1- ;!1I. ;;
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
�� * Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Segment#38 546
Location: Schleisman Road
Between: Hellman Avenue & Archibald Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 39
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.98
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
34,671
5,300

1.00 3 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted and Raised Medians Arterial
Speed Survey Data
57 mph
49-58 mph
50 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
15 0.13, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
3 Lanes Each Direction between Hellman and e/o Aldergate Rd/Whitewell Rd. 3WB/2EB e/o Aldergate/Whitewell w/o Gypsum Creek, 2WB/2EB w/o Gypsum Creek and w/o Kenton Pl. 2WB/3EB w/o Kenton to Archibald.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential
50 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 55 mph, then reduced another 5mph due to trucks present and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
547
Location: Schleisman Road
Between: Archibald Avenue & Sumner Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 40
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
14,855
5,238

0.99 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted and Raised Medians Arterial
Speed Survey Data
49 mph
40-49 mph
45 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
2 0.12, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
3EB/3WB between Archibald and Moonflower, 2EB/3WB between Moonflower and Harrison, 2EB/2WB between Harrison and Cedar Creek Rd, 1EB/2WB between Cedar Creek and Sumner.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential / Commercial Retail
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
548
Location: Schleisman Road
Between: Sumner Avenue & Scholar Way
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 41
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions: 0
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.32
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021

0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Undeveloped land to the south
Roadway Geometrics:

Comment
s:
trucks present
Residential / Undeveloped
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph)
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
7,737
2,650

0.50 Single Lane Each Direction w/Painted Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
48 mph
39-48 mph
45 mph
12/20/2021
549
Location: Schleisman Road
Between: Scholar Way & Hamner Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 42
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.91
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
7,682
3,040

0.58 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
51 mph
42-51 mph
45 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Curved roadway, location of church. 2 Lane Each Direction between Scholar and Raymond. 1EB/2WB between Raymond and Hamner.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential / Commercial
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph due to trucks present and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
550
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Scholar Way Survey Date: June 5. 2018
Between: Citrus Street & Schleisman Road
Direction of Travel: North/South
Traffic Data
Average Daily Traffic: 5,600
Length of Segment (feet): 3,300
Length of Segment (miles): 0.63
Lane Configuration: 2 Lanes Each Direction w/2-way LT lane Street Classification: Secondary
Speed Survey Data
85th Percentile: 39 mph
10 mph Pace: 29-38 mph
Posted Speed Limit: 35 mph
Collision History
Date Range: January 1, 2016 - December 31, 2017
Total Collisions: 4
Collision Rate (Collisions/MVM): 1.55
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Very heavy pedestrian/student/bicyclist activity on sidewalks. No parking. No bike lanes except for partial Class ll NB.

Roadway Geometrics:

Straight alignment. Southerly part of segment uses delineators to control U-turns and ped Xings.

Comments:

High school, intermediate school, elementary school & public library adjacent to street. Lots of congestion.

Adjacent Land Use: Residential & schools
Recommendation 35 mph
Speed Limit Change: No
Revised Speed Limit: 35 mph
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
0 �� �
'-/;k � 4:1:::: 7££f2. L201t:1. ;I
,i:. • Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group � Segment#43 551
Location: Scholar Way
Between: Schleisman Road & Limonite Avenue
Survey Date: July 29, 2021
Segment No.: 44
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

0.91 Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recom
me
ndation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
4,721
5,250

0.99 Single Lane Each Direction w/Painted Median
Secondary
Speed Survey Data
43 mph
35-44 mph
35 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No bike lanes. 2SB/1NB between Limonite to Peach Blossom. Heavy pedestrian/student/bicyclist activity. Harada Park & Harada Elementary School.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comments
:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential
40 mph
Yes, 5 mph increase
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 45 mph, then reduced 5 mph)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
552
Location: Scholar Way
Between: Limonite Avenue & Bellegrave Avenue
Survey Date: July 29, 2021
Segment No.: 45
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

1.60 Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed: 40 mph
Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
6,678
3,700

0.70 Single Lane Each Direction w/Painted Median
Secondary
Speed Survey Data
43 mph
34-43 mph
N/A

0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No bike lanes. Sidewalk only on west side of roadway. Armadillos and delineators between 58th St and Bellegrave Ave. Empty lot to east and residential to the west between 58th St and Limonite Ave. Residential on both sides north of 58th St.

Roadway Geometrics:

Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Comments:

On-street parking, residential density, and ped/bike
safety
Residential
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 45 mph, then reduced 5 mph)
Establishing Speed Limit
Recommendation
12/20/2021
553
Location: Sumner Avenue
Between: Citrus Street & 65th Street
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 46
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
4,028
5,935

1.12 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted Median
Major
Speed Survey Data
51 mph
43-52 mph
45 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Bicycle Lanes, with bicyclists present. 1SB/2NB between Citrus and Cool Meadow, 2SB/2NB between Cool Meadow and Pheasant Knoll, 1SB/1NB Pheasant Knoll and Schleisman, 1SB/2NB between Schleisman and Starflower, 2SB/2NB between Starflower and 65th.

Roadway Geometrics:

Roadway narrow between Schleisman and Orange.

Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph due trucks present and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
554
Location: Sumner Avenue
Between: 65th Street and Bellegrave Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 47
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions: 1
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
7,857
5,422

1.03 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted Median
Major
Speed Survey Data
51 mph
41-50 mph
45 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021

0.11, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
bike lanes, with pedestrians and bikes present. Orchard Park. Pedestrian/Bicyclist Activity.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential / Commercial Retail
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph due trucks present and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
555
Location: Whitewall Road
Between: Schleisman Road & Prairie Smoke Road
Survey Date: February 18, 2021
Segment No.: 48
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.60
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
2,056
1,542

0.29 Single Lane Each Direction
Local
Speed Survey Data
40 mph
29-38 mph
35 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
2 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No bike lanes.

Roadway Geometrics:

Straight Alignment. Jog in the roadway near Prairie Smoke Road. Single Lane Each Direction w/ no centerline or edgelines. Residential Single Lane Collector.

Comments:
high collision rate, residential density, and ped/bike safety Residential
35 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(reduced by 5mph from 40 mph down to 35 mph, due to high collision rate, residential density, and ped/bike safety)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
556
557

APPENDIX D
Strip Maps
(Updated September 2022)

558

559

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):
58TH STREET

SCHOLAR WAY TO HAMNER AVE

0.49 mi

RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL
58TH STREET

UNDEVELOPED
NOT TO SCALE North

SCHOLAR WAY

JAMESTOWN AVENUE

HAMNER AVENUE
• 35 MPH
560
561

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):
65TH STREET

HAMNER AVENUE TO WELLS SPRING ST (NCL)

0.31 mi

RESIDENTIAL
65TH STREET

RESIDENTIAL
NOT TO SCALE North
35 MPH •

HAMNER AVENUE

WELLS SPRING ST
• 35 MPH

562

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
68TH STREET
NOT TO SCALE North

SUMNER AVENUE

SCHOLAR WAY

HAMNER AVENUE
68TH STREET

SUMNER AVENUE TO HAMNER AVENUE
1 mi

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
• 45 MPH
45 MPH •
• 45 MPH
45 MPH •
563

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):
68TH STREET

0.5 mi

RESIDENTIAL
68TH STREET

RESIDENTIAL
NOT TO SCALE North

HAMNER AVENUE

WELLS SPRING ST
I-15 INTERSTATE HWY

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL

CITY LIMITS
45 MPH •

WELLS SPRING STREET
(ECL)

HAMNER AVENUE TO WELLS SPRING STREET (ECL)
564

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

ARCHIBALD AVENUE

BLUFF STREET TO WIND RIVER/GRAPEWIN STREET

1.46 mi
NOT TO SCALE North

RIVER STREET

ARCHIBALD
AVENUE

WIND RIVER RD

BARONROAD
BLUFF

GRAPEWIN
STREET
55 MPH •
KENDAL
ROAD
RIVER
ROAD55 MPH •
• 55 MPH
STREET

CITY LIMITS

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL

UNDEVELOPED

UNDEVELOPED

UNDEVELOPED

UNDEVELOPED

RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURE
565

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

ARCHIBALD AVENUE

1.63 mi
NOT TO SCALE North SCHLEISMAN ROAD
WIND

RIVER RD

GRAPEWIN
STREET

CHANDLER STREET

FIELDMASTER
STREET

SMITH RIVER
ROAD
SLATE
CREEK

EASTVALEPKWY
AVENUE
ROAD
• 50 MPH

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
50 MPH •
• 50 MPH
• 50 MPH
• 50 MPH

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL
50 MPH •
• 50 MPH
566

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

ARCHIBALD AVENUE

1.14 mi
NOT TO SCALE North

INDUSTRIAL

ARCHI BALD

SCHLEISMAN ROAD
AVENUE
65TH STREET

LIMONITE AVENUE

BELLEGRAVE AVENUE

CITY LIMIT

RESIDENTIAL

AGRICULTURE

COMMERCIAL

COMMERCIAL

INDUSTRIAL

RESIDENTIAL
• 50 MPH
• 50 MPH
50 MPH •
50 MPH •

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
(NCL)
567
568
569

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

BELLEGRAVE AVENUE

HAMNER AVENUE TO EAST CITY LIMIT

0.49 mi
NOT TO SCALE North

HAMNER AVENUE

COMMERCIAL
I-15
50 MPH •

BELLEGRAVE AVENUECITY LIMIT

RESIDENTIALRESIDENTIAL

INTERSTATE HWY

CITY LIMIT
570

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

BLOSSOM WAY

HARRISON AVENUE TO SUMNER AVENUE

0.5 mi

BLOSSOM WAY
NOT TO SCALE North

HARRISON AVENUE

SUMNER AVENUE

CEDAR CREEK ROAD
30 MPH •
• 30 MPH

REDSIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL
30 MPH •

PINE GROVE PL
571
CITY OF EASTVALEDepartment of Public WorksSTRIP MAPStreet Name:Street Segment:Segment Length (MI):

NOT TO SCALENorth
CANTU-GALLEANO RANCH RD.HAMNER AVENUE TO I-15 FREEWAY.50 mi CANTU-GALLEANORANCHRD.

COMMERCIALLIGHTINDUSTRIAL
&IT< LIMIT(I-15)HAMN(R A9(NU( LIGHTINDUSTRIALGOODMAN RD.&IT< LIMIT

LIGHTINDUSTRIAL
&IT< 2) 2NTARI2 &IT< 2) -URUPA 9ALL(< • 50 MPH • 50 MPH
572

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

RESIDENTIAL

CHANDLER STREET
NOT TO SCALE North

HELLMAN AVENUE

ARCHIBALD AVENUE

HARRISON AVENUE

CHANDLER STREET

HELLMAN AVENUE TO HARRISON AVENUE

1.53 mi

RESIDENTIAL
• 45 MPH

SELBY AVENUE

SHOREHAM
STREET
• 45 MPH
• 45 MPH

CITY LIMIT

UNDEVELOPED

UNDEVELOPED

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
45 MPH •
45 MPH •
45 MPH •
45 MPH •

RESIDENTIAL
573
CITY OF EASTVALEDepartment of Public WorksSTRIP MAPStreet Name:Street Segment:Segment Length (MI):

CITRUS STREET
NOT TO SCALENorth

HARRISON AVENUE

SUMNER AVENUE
CITRUS STREETHARRISON AVENUE TO SCHOLAR :AY0

PL
SCHOLAR WAY• 25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE) •  MPH
SCHOOL =ONE
• 40 MPHRESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIALRESIDENTIALHIGH SCHOOLPARK
• 40 MPH

COUNTRY FAIR DRIVE

COBBLE CREEK DRIVERESIDENTIALRESIDENTIAL
574

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

CITRUS STREET
NOT TO SCALE North

HAMNER AVENUE

CITRUS STREET
SC+OLAR :AY TO +AMNER A9ENUE
 PL
ವ  MP+

SCHOLAR WAY
• 25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE)
ವ  MP+

HIGH SCHOOL

RESIDENTIAL
PARK

CARROLLTON PLACE

MAYFIELD STREET
575

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

NOT TO SCALE North

FIELDMASTER STREET

HALL ROAD TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE
.99 mi

RESIDENTIAL

FIELDMASTER
STREET
40 MPH •
• 25 MPH
• 40 MPH
• 40 MPH
25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE) •
(SCHOOL ZONE)
CR
E
EK

RD

C
H
E
R
R
Y

MEADOW
BROOK

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
SCHOOL
PARK

HALL RD

ARCHIBALD AVE
576

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

RIVERBOAT ROAD

HAMNER AVENUE

HAMNER AVENUE
.62 mi

CITRUS STREET

NOT TO SCALE

CITY LIMITS

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL

COMMERCIAL
45 MPH •
• 35 MPH
• 35 MPH

FAIR GROUNDS

RESIDENTIALPARK
577

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

RIVERBOAT ROAD

HAMNER AVENUE

HAMNER AVENUE
1 mi

LIMONITE AVENUE

NOT TO SCALE
68TH STREET

RESIDENTIAL

COMMERCIAL

OAKDALE STREET
• 45 MPH
• 45 MPH
• 45 MPH
• 45 MPH

RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIALRESIDENTIALRESIDENTIAL
65TH STREET
45 MPH •
45 MPH •
45 MPH •

RESIDENTIAL

COMMERCIAL
• 35 MPH
578

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

RESIDENTIAL
North
HAMNER

HAMNER AVENUE

0.91 mi

LIMONITE AVENUE

NOT TO SCALE
58TH STREET
• 45 MPH

SWAN LAKE

BELLEGRAVE AVENUE

CITY LIMIT

UNDEVELOPED
AVENUE
• 45 MPH
45 MPH •COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL
579

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

CHANDLER STREET
North

HARRISON AVENUE

HARRISON AVENUE

CHANDLER STREET TO SCHLEISMAN ROAD
1 mi
• 45 MPH

RESIDENTIAL

SCHLEISMAN ROAD
CITRUS STREET • 45 MPH

NOT TO SCALE
45 MPH •

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
45 MPH •
580
581

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

HELLMAN AVENUE

RIVER ROAD TO

0.97 mi

CONSERVATION
AREA

NOT TO SCALE

CITY LIMITSHELLMAN AVENUE

RIVER ROAD

CHANDLER STREET

UNDEVELOPED

RESIDENTIAL

AGRICULTURE
• 30 MPH
(W1-1)50 MPH •

UNDEVELOPED

UNDEVELOPED

CHANDLER STREET
582

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

HELLMAN AVENUE

NOT TO SCALE

CITY LIMITHELLMAN AVENUE

CHANDLER STREET

SCHLEISMAN ROAD

UNDEVELOPED
25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE) •
50 MPH •
SCHOOL

WALTERS STREET

ALDERGATE
ROAD
MARKET
STREET

PINE AVENUE

PRAIRIE SMOKE
ROAD

LANDERWOOD DRIVE

BICKMORE AVENUE

1.54 mi

CHANDLER STREET TO LIMONITE AVENUE
AVENUE

LIMONITE AVE
PARK

INDUSTRIAL
ks
STREET
50 MPH •
VELO
25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE) •

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL

UNDEVELOPED

RESIDENTIAL

INDUSTRIAL

KIMBALL AVENUE

CHINO CORONA ROAD

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
583

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

NOT TO SCALE

HELLMAN AVENUE

LIMONITE AVENUE TO NORTH CITY LIMIT

0.20 mi

HELLMAN AVENUE

CHANDLER STREET

INDUSTRIAL

INDUSTRIAL

LIMONITE AVE

INDUSTRIAL

SUMMIT DR

INDUSTRIAL

HELLMAN AVENU

CITY LIMIT

ENTERPRISE WAY (PRIVATE)

1.54 mi

KIMBALL AVENUE

CITY LIMIT

INDUSTRIAL
584

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

MISSION BLVD
S MILLIKEN AVENUE TO ONTARIO FREEWAY (I-15)

0.5 mi

NOT TO SCALE

MISSION
S. MILLILKEN AVENUE
BLVD

MANUFACTURING

INDUSTRIAL
North
CITY LIMITS(I-15)

COMMERCIAL

COMMERCIAL
60 MPH •
585

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

ORANGE STREET

SUMNER AVENUE TO SCHOLAR WAY

0.5 mi

NOT TO SCALE
SCHOOL

ORANGE STREET
30 MPH •

SUMNER AVENUE
• 30 MPH

SCHOLAR WAY
25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE) •
• 25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE)

RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTUREAGRICULTURE

RESIDENTIAL
586

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

PRAIRIE SMOKE ROAD

HELLMAN AVENUE TO WHITEWELL ROAD

0.26 mi

NOT TO SCALE

RESIDENTIAL

PRAIRIE SMOKE ROAD

HELLMAN AVENUE

WHITEWELL ROAD
35 MPH •
• 35 MPH

RESIDENTIAL
587

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

RIVER ROAD

HELLMAN AVENUE TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE

0.75 mi

NOT TO SCALE

ARCHIBALD AVENUE

RESIDENTIAL

CITY LIMITSHELLMAN AVENUE

RIVER ROAD

HALL ROAD

AGRICULTURE

AGRICULTURE
40 MPH •

RESIDENTIAL
588
589

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

SCHLEISMAN ROAD

HELLMAN AVENUE TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE
1 mi

NOT TO SCALE

SCHLEISMAN ROAD

HELLMAN AVENUE

ARCHI BALD AVENUE

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
• 50 MPH

CITY LIMIT
50 MPH •
50 MPH •

COMMERCIAL
590

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

SCHLEISMAN ROAD

ARCHIBALD AVENUE TO SUMNER AVENUE

0.99 mi

NOT TO SCALE

SCHLEISMAN ROAD

ARCHIBALD
SUMNER

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
• 45 MPH

HARRISON
AVENUE

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
SCHOOL

COMMUNITY
CENTER
AVENUE
AVENUE
• 45 MPH
• 45 MPH
25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE) •
45 MPH •
45 MPH •
45 MPH •
45 MPH •
591

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

SCHLEISMAN ROAD

SUMNER AVENUE TO SCHOLAR WAY

0.5 mi

NOT TO SCALE

SCHLEISMAN ROAD
SUMNER

SCHOLAR

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL

UNDEVELOPED
AVENUE
WAY
UNDEVELOPED45 MPH •
592

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

SCHLEISMAN ROAD

SCHOLAR WAY TO HAMNER AVENUE

0.58 mi

NOT TO SCALE

SCHLEISMAN

HAMMNER

SCHOLAR

RESIDENTIAL
AVENUE
WAY
ROAD

RESIDENTIAL

COMMERCIAL
45 MPH •
593

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

SCHOLAR WAY

SCHLEISMAN ROAD TO LIMONITE AVENUE

0.99 mi

NOT TO SCALE

SCHOLAR

SCHLEISMAN ROAD

LIMONITE AVE
• 25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE)WAY

RESIDENTIAL
SCHOOL
PUBLIC
PARK

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
North
25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE) •
35 MPH •
35 MPH •
• 35 MPH
• 35 MPH
35 MPH •
594
595

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

SUMNER AVENUE
CITRUS STREET TO 65th STREET

1.12 mi

NOT TO SCALE
SUMNER

CITRUS STREET
65th STREET
AVENUE

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL

SCHLEISMAN ROAD
• 45 MPH
• 45 MPH

RESIDENTIAL
• 45 MPH
45 MPH •
45 MPH •
596

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

SUMNER AVENUE
65th STREET TO BELLEGRAVE AVENUE

1.03 mi

NOT TO SCALE
SUMNER
65TH STREET
AVENUE45 MPH •

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL

LIMONITE AVENUE

RESIDENTIAL
• 45 MPH

ORCHARD
PARK

SHOPPING
CENTER
• 45 MPH

BELLEGRAVE AVENUE

CITY LIMIT
597

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

WHITEWELL ROAD

SCHLEISMAN ROAD TO PRAIRIE SMOKE ROAD

0.29 mi

NOT TO SCALE

WHITEWELL

SCHLEISMAN ROAD
ROAD

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
• 35 MPH

PRAIRIE

SMOKE RD
598
599

APPENDIX E
Speed Survey Data Sheets
(Updated September 2022)

600

601
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: 58th Street
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Scholar Way - Hamner Avenue
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 0 3 46 X X X 3
45 0 0 45 0
44 0 2 44 X X 2 Time
43 2 1 43 X X X 3 From: 11:00
42 2 2 42 X X X X 4
41 2 1 41 X X X 3 Time
40 2 4 40 X X X X X X 6 * To: 12:05
39 2 3 39 X X X X X 5 *
38 7 5 38 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 * Existing
37 7 3 37 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P Speed Limit: 25 MPH
36 7 4 36 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A
35 4 2 35 X X X X X X 6 C
34 4 4 34 X X X X X X X X 8 E
33 1 1 33 X X 2 *
32 2 6 32 X X X X X X X X 8 *
31 0 4 31 X X X X 4 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 30 1 1 30 X X 2 % Over Pace: 0% 18% 15%
29 3 1 29 X X X X 4
28 3 1 28 X X X X 4 % In Pace: 78% 72% 72%
27 1 2 27 X X X 3
26 0 0 26 0 % Under Pace: 22% 10% 13%
25 0 0 25 0
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 36 MPH 36 MPH 36 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 34 - 43 MPH 31 - 40 MPH 31 - 40 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 30 MPH 31 MPH 31 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 36 MPH 36 MPH 36 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 42 MPH 40 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
7/29/21
602
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: 65th Street
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Sumner Avenue - Hamner Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 1:00
52 1 0 52 X 1
51 1 1 51 X X 2 Time
50 2 0 50 X X 2 To: 1:30
49 1 2 49 X X X 3
48 4 2 48 X X X X X X 6 * Existing
47 5 5 47 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * Speed Limit: 40 MPH
46 6 0 46 X X X X X X 6 *
45 2 4 45 X X X X X X 6 P
44 4 3 44 X X X X X X X 7 A
43 3 5 43 X X X X X X X X 8 C
42 4 5 42 X X X X X X X X X 9 E
41 2 7 41 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 5 4 40 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % Over Pace: 10% 2% 8%
39 4 2 39 X X X X X X 6 *
38 1 1 38 X X 2 % In Pace: 78% 74% 76%
37 3 4 37 X X X X X X X 7
36 1 1 36 X X 2 % Under Pace: 12% 24% 16%
35 0 2 35 X X 2
34 0 1 34 X 1 Average Speed: 43 MPH 42 MPH 43 MPH
33 1 1 33 X X 2
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 39 - 48 MPH 40 - 49 MPH 39 - 48 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 39 MPH 37 MPH 38 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 42 MPH 43 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 47 MPH 47 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
7/22/21
603
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: 65th Street
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Sumner Avenue - Hamner Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 1:00
52 1 0 52 X 1
51 1 1 51 X X 2 Time
50 2 0 50 X X 2 To: 1:30
49 1 2 49 X X X 3
48 4 2 48 X X X X X X 6 * Existing
47 5 5 47 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * Speed Limit: 40 MPH
46 6 0 46 X X X X X X 6 *
45 2 4 45 X X X X X X 6 P
44 4 3 44 X X X X X X X 7 A
43 3 5 43 X X X X X X X X 8 C
42 4 5 42 X X X X X X X X X 9 E
41 2 7 41 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 5 4 40 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % Over Pace: 10% 2% 8%
39 4 2 39 X X X X X X 6 *
38 1 1 38 X X 2 % In Pace: 78% 74% 76%
37 3 4 37 X X X X X X X 7
36 1 1 36 X X 2 % Under Pace: 12% 24% 16%
35 0 2 35 X X 2
34 0 1 34 X 1 Average Speed: 43 MPH 42 MPH 43 MPH
33 1 1 33 X X 2
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 39 - 48 MPH 40 - 49 MPH 39 - 48 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 39 MPH 37 MPH 38 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 42 MPH 43 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 47 MPH 47 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
7/22/21
604
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: 68th Street
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Hamner Avenue - East City Limits
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 1 53 X 1 From: 11:00
52 1 0 52 X 1
51 1 0 51 X 1 Time
50 0 1 50 X 1 To: 11:20
49 2 2 49 X X X X 4
48 2 2 48 X X X X 4 * Existing
47 5 1 47 X X X X X X 6 * Speed Limit: 45 MPH
46 3 5 46 X X X X X X X X 8 *
45 7 3 45 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P
44 4 3 44 X X X X X X X 7 A
43 6 4 43 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C
42 4 4 42 X X X X X X X X 8 E
41 5 3 41 X X X X X X X X 8 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 4 8 40 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 * % Over Pace: 4% 14% 8% 39 2 3 39 X X X X X 5 *
38 1 2 38 X X X 3 % In Pace: 84% 78% 78%
37 2 4 37 X X X X X X 6
36 1 4 36 X X X X X 5 % Under Pace: 12% 8% 14%
35 0 0 35 0
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 44 MPH 42 MPH 43 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 40 - 49 MPH 37 - 46 MPH 39 - 48 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 37 MPH 39 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 42 MPH 43 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 47 MPH 46 MPH 47 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/11/21
605
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: 68th Street
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Sumner Avenue - Hamner Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 1 54 X 1 Time
53 1 0 53 X 1 From: 11:25
52 1 0 52 X 1
51 1 3 51 X X X X 4 Time
50 4 1 50 X X X X X 5 To: 11:50
49 1 2 49 X X X 3
48 1 3 48 X X X X 4 * Existing
47 4 4 47 X X X X X X X X 8 * Speed Limit: 45 MPH
46 7 2 46 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
45 4 3 45 X X X X X X X 7 P
44 4 3 44 X X X X X X X 7 A
43 3 3 43 X X X X X X 6 C
42 5 6 42 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 E
41 5 4 41 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 2 4 40 X X X X X X 6 * % Over Pace: 18% 14% 15%
39 2 3 39 X X X X X 5 *
38 3 1 38 X X X X 4 % In Pace: 78% 70% 72%
37 1 5 37 X X X X X X 6
36 0 2 36 X X 2 % Under Pace: 4% 16% 13%
35 1 0 35 X 1
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 44 MPH 43 MPH 44 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 38 - 47 MPH 39 - 48 MPH 39 - 48 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 38 MPH 39 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 42 MPH 44 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 49 MPH 48 MPH 49 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/11/21
606
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Archibald Avenue
75 0 0 75 0
74 0 0 74 0
73 0 0 73 0 Between: Bluff Street - Wind River Road / Grapewin Street 72 0 0 72 0
71 0 0 71 0
70 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear
69 0 0 69 0
68 0 0 68 0
67 0 0 67 0 Date:
66 0 0 66 0
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0 Time
63 0 1 63 X 1 From: 10:00
62 0 1 62 X 1
61 0 0 61 0 Time
60 0 3 60 X X X 3 To: 10:25
59 1 2 59 X X X 3
58 1 1 58 X X 2 Existing
57 9 4 57 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 * Speed Limit: 55 MPH 56 6 2 56 X X X X X X X X 8 *
55 5 2 55 X X X X X X X 7 *
54 3 5 54 X X X X X X X X 8 P
53 1 6 53 X X X X X X X 7 A
52 6 5 52 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C
51 2 1 51 X X X 3 E Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 50 4 4 50 X X X X X X X X 8 * % Over Pace: 4% 16% 10%
49 1 3 49 X X X X 4 *
48 6 4 48 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * % In Pace: 86% 72% 79% 47 2 2 47 X X X X 4
46 3 3 46 X X X X X X 6 % Under Pace: 10% 12% 11%
45 0 1 45 X 1
44 0 0 44 0 Average Speed: 53 MPH 53 MPH 53 MPH
43 0 0 43 0
42 0 0 42 0 Pace Speed: 48 - 57 MPH 48 - 57 MPH 48 - 57 MPH 41 0 0 41 0
40 0 0 40 0
39 0 0 39 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 48 MPH 48 MPH 38 0 0 38 0
37 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 53 MPH 53 MPH 53 MPH 36 0 0 36 0
35 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 57 MPH 58 MPH 57 MPH 34 0 0 34 0
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0
31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0
28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/17/21
607
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Archibald Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Schleisman Road - Bellegrave Avenue / North City Limits 62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 1 3 59 X X X X 4
58 4 0 58 X X X X 4
57 0 2 57 X X 2 Date:
56 0 1 56 X 1
55 5 2 55 X X X X X X X 7 *
54 2 5 54 X X X X X X X 7 * Time
53 4 2 53 X X X X X X 6 * From: 11:05
52 2 2 52 X X X X 4 P
51 3 5 51 X X X X X X X X 8 A Time
50 5 3 50 X X X X X X X X 8 C To: 11:30
49 4 6 49 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E
48 5 7 48 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 * Existing
47 4 4 47 X X X X X X X X 8 * Speed Limit: 50 MPH
46 2 4 46 X X X X X X 6 *
45 6 1 45 X X X X X X X 7
44 1 3 44 X X X X 4
43 1 0 43 X 1
42 1 0 42 X 1
41 0 0 41 0 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics
40 0 0 40 0 % Over Pace: 20% 12% 11%
39 0 0 39 0
38 0 0 38 0 % In Pace: 74% 80% 76%
37 0 0 37 0
36 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 6% 8% 13%
35 0 0 35 0
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 50 MPH 50 MPH 50 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 45 - 54 MPH 46 - 55 MPH 46 - 55 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 45 MPH 46 MPH 46 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 49 MPH 50 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 55 MPH 55 MPH 55 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/18/21
608
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Archibald Avenue
75 0 0 75 0
74 0 0 74 0
73 0 0 73 0 Between: Wind River Road / Grapewin Street - Schleisman Road 72 0 0 72 0
71 0 0 71 0
70 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear
69 0 0 69 0
68 0 0 68 0
67 0 0 67 0 Date:
66 0 0 66 0
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0 Time
63 0 0 63 0 From: 9:40
62 1 0 62 X 1
61 0 0 61 0 Time
60 4 2 60 X X X X X X 6 To: 10:05
59 1 3 59 X X X X 4
58 1 1 58 X X 2 Existing
57 3 2 57 X X X X X 5 * Speed Limit: 50 MPH
56 3 2 56 X X X X X 5 *
55 3 3 55 X X X X X X 6 *
54 4 4 54 X X X X X X X X 8 P
53 2 1 53 X X X 3 A
52 1 3 52 X X X X 4 C
51 2 9 51 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 E Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 50 7 3 50 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * % Over Pace: 14% 12% 13% 49 5 4 49 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
48 3 6 48 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % In Pace: 66% 74% 70%
47 3 2 47 X X X X X 5
46 3 1 46 X X X X 4 % Under Pace: 20% 14% 17%
45 2 2 45 X X X X 4
44 0 0 44 0 Average Speed: 52 MPH 52 MPH 52 MPH
43 1 1 43 X X 2
42 1 0 42 X 1 Pace Speed: 48 - 57MPH 48 - 57MPH 48 - 57MPH 41 0 1 41 X 1
40 0 0 40 0
39 0 0 39 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed:47 MPH 48 MPH 47 MPH 38 0 0 38 0
37 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed:50 MPH 51 MPH 51 MPH 36 0 0 36 0
35 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed:57 MPH 57 MPH 57 MPH 34 0 0 34 0
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0
31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0
28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
9/14/21
609
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Baron Road
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Archibald Avenue - River Road
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 0 0 46 0
45 0 1 45 X 1
44 1 1 44 X X 2 Time
43 4 1 43 X X X X X 5 From: 9:00
42 2 2 42 X X X X 4
41 0 2 41 X X 2 Time
40 1 2 40 X X X 3 To: 10:00
39 1 2 39 X X X 3
38 2 3 38 X X X X X 5 Existing
37 1 2 37 X X X 3 Speed Limit: 35 MPH
36 2 2 36 X X X X 4 *
35 6 0 35 X X X X X X 6 *
34 2 1 34 X X X 3 *
33 6 4 33 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P
32 0 1 32 X 1 A
31 8 3 31 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 30 3 4 30 X X X X X X X 7 E % Over Pace: 24% 36% 28%
29 2 5 29 X X X X X X X 7 *
28 4 4 28 X X X X X X X X 8 * % In Pace: 72% 64% 65%
27 3 5 27 X X X X X X X X 8 *
26 0 1 26 X 1 % Under Pace: 4% 0% 7%
25 2 4 25 X X X X X X 6
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 34 MPH 33 MPH 33 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 27 - 36 MPH 25 - 34 MPH 27 - 36 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 28 MPH 27 MPH 27 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 33 MPH 31 MPH 33 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 40 MPH 40 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/17/21
610
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Bellegrave Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Hamner Avenue - East City Limits
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 1 0 53 X 1 From: 9:20
52 3 4 52 X X X X X X X 7
51 2 1 51 X X X 3 Time
50 0 1 50 X 1 To: 9:40
49 0 1 49 X 1
48 5 2 48 X X X X X X X 7 * Existing
47 2 5 47 X X X X X X X 7 * Speed Limit: 50 MPH
46 5 6 46 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
45 2 3 45 X X X X X 5 P
44 3 2 44 X X X X X 5 A
43 9 8 43 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 C
42 4 1 42 X X X X X 5 E
41 5 5 41 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 3 2 40 X X X X X 5 * % Over Pace: 12% 14% 13%
39 0 5 39 X X X X X 5 *
38 3 1 38 X X X X 4 % In Pace: 76% 78% 77%
37 2 2 37 X X X X 4
36 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 12% 8% 10%
35 1 1 35 X X 2
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 44 MPH 44 MPH 44 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 40 - 49 MPH 39 - 48 MPH 39 - 48 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 39 MPH 39 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 43 MPH 43 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 48 MPH 48 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100