Folsom City Council
December 10, 2024

12/10/2024 Item No.18.

STA Resolution STA-2024-005 adopted the 2024 Sacramento Transportation Mitigation Fee Program (SCTMFP) Nexus Study and Set Updated SCTMFP Fee Rates Effective January 1,2025'
This Agreement, aS amended, when approved by resolution of the STA and executed by the Entity, shall constitute the current protocols related to SCTMFP Fee implementation.

This amended Agreement is uniform among the County and all incorporated cities.

This Amended Agreement replaces and supersedes the prior version of the Agreement in its entirety.

NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows

1.0 DEFINITIONS

1.1 1.2

1.3 1.4

1.5 J
K.

L
'AB 602' means the act to amend Sections 65940.1 and 66019 of, and to add Section 66016.5 to, the State of California Government Code (CGC), and to add Section 50466.5 to the Health and Safety Code, relating to land use, development impact fees, and impact fee nexus studies. "AB 1600" means the Mitigation Fee Act set forth in the CGC Sections 66001 - 60025.
"Accessory Dwelling Unit" (ADU) means an attached or detached permanent dwelling unit that provides complete independent living facilities (permanent provisions for living, sleeping, eating, cooking, and sanitation) for one or more persons and which is located on a lot with a proposed or existing primary dwelling.
"Affordability requirement" means a requirement imposed as a condition of a development of residential units, that the development includes a certain percentage of the units affordable for rent or sale to households with incomes that do not exceed the limits for moderate-income, lower income, very low income, or extremely low income households specified in Sections sOtj2g.s,50093,50105, and 50106 of the Health and Safety Code, oran alternative means of compliance with that requirement including, but not limited to, in-lieu fees, land dedication, off-site construction, or acquisition and rehabilitation of existing units.
"Development Project" or "Project" shall have the same meaning as provided in CGC Section 66000(a), as such section may be amended from time to time.

SCTMFP: Agreement on Operating Protocols
STA & Entity
2

12/10/2024 Item No.18.

1.6 1.7

1.10 "Executive Directo/' means the Executive Director of the Sacramento Tra nspo rtation Authority.
"Expenditure Plan" means the Sacramento County Measure A Transportation Expenditure Plan 2009-2039 that was adopted as part of the Ordinance.

1.8 "Governing Board" means the Governing Board of the Sacramento Transportation AuthoritY.

1.9 "Housing Development" means a development project with common ownership and financing consisting of residential use or mixed use where not less than 50 percent of the floorspace is for residential use. "lndependent Taxpayer Oversight Committee" means the committee appointed by the STA Governing Board as required by the Ordinance to supervise Measure A fiscal and performance audits regarding the use of all sales tax funds and to provide independent review to ensure that all Measure A funds are spent in accordance with the provisions of the Ordinance.

1.11 "lndustrial USe" means any Development Project that involves manufacturing, transportation, logistics, or similar uses.

1.12 "Measure A' or "the Ordinance"
Authority Ordinance No. STA-04-01
means Sacramento Transportation

1.i3 "Multi-Family Residential Use" means any Development Project that uses a single parcel for two or more dwelling units within one or more buildings, including duplexes, townhouses, condominiums, and apartments, but excluding an Accessory Dwelling Unit.

1.14 "Normalized cost per trip" means the medium-sized single family residential fee rate per Section 2.1 divided by the average weekday trip generation rate for a single family residence (9.44) per the lnstitute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (11th Ed.). The normalized cost per trip is $167 and will be adjusted annually per Section 2'2.

1.15 "Office Use" means any Development Project that involves business activities, associated with professional or administrative services, and typically consists of corporate offices, financial institutions, legal and medical offices, personai seryices, or similar uses.

1.10 "Participating Agencies" means the County of Sacramento, the City of Citrus Heights, the City of Elk Grove, the City of Folsom, the City of Galt, the City SCTMFP: Agreement on Operating Protocols
STA & Entity
3

12/10/2024 Item No.18.
of lsleton, the City of Rancho Cordova, and the City of Sacramento. Each may be referred to individually as "Participating Agency."

1.12 "Retail Use" means any Development Project that involves retailing of merchandise, generally without transformation, retail food services, and rendering services incidental to the sale of merchandise at a fixed point of sale.

1.18 "sacramento Countywide Transportation Mitigation Fee Program" or 'SCTMFP" means the 30-year transportation mitigation fee program established bY the Ordinance.

1.1g "SCTMFP Fee" or "Fee" means the fee imposed pursuant to the SCTMFP.

1.2O "senior Residential Use" means any Development Project that qualifies as housing for older persons pursuant to CGC Section 12955.9'

1.21 "single Family Residential Use" means any Development Project that uses a single parcel for only one residential dwelling unit. "Single Family Residential Use" also includes any Development Project that involves one primary dwelling and one Accessory Dwelling Unit on a single lot.

1.22 "Transit station" has the meaning set forth in paragraph (4) of subdivision (b) of CGC Section 65460.1. That definition reads as follows, "transit station" means a rail or light-rail station, ferry terminal, bus hub, or bus tranSfer StatiOn." "BuS hub" and "bus tranSfer StatiOn" are defined aS:
a) "Bus hub" means an intersection of three or more bus routes, with a minimum route headway of 10 minutes during peak hours'
b) "Bus transfer station" means an arrival, departure, or transfer point for the area's intercity, intraregional, or interregional bus service having permanent investment in multiple bus docking facilities, ticketing services, and passenger shelters.
"Transit station" includes planned transit stations othenrvise meeting this definition whose construction is programmed to be completed prior to the scheduled completion and occupancy of the housing development.

1.23 "Weekday trip generation per ITE' means a technically supportable methodology based on the ITE Trip Generation Manual to calculate the expected average weekday trip generation based on the type(s) and size of new land use set forth in the development application."

2.0 UNIFORM FEE
SCTMFP: Agreement on Operating Protocols
STA & Entity
4

12/10/2024 Item No.18.

2.1 Uniform Fee. Effective January 1st, 2025, the Entity shall collect the applicable uniform SCTMFP Fee, as amended, for each Development Project occurring within the Entity's jurisdiction. The applicable Fee for each use is as follows:

Single-Fam ily Residential
Very Small (<800 sq.ft.)
Small (801 -1,200 sq.tt.)
Medium-Small (1 ,2O1-1,600 sq.ft.)
Medium (1 ,601 -2,400 sq.ft.)
Large (>2,400 sq.ft.)
Single-Fam ily Residential,
Senior
Very Small (<800 sq.ft.)
Small (801 -1,200 sq.ft.)
Medium-Small (1 ,201-1,600 sq.ft.)
Medium (1,601 -2,400 sq.ft.)
Large (>2,400 sq.ft.)
Multi-Fam ily Residential
Very Small (<800 sq.ft.)
Small (801 -1,200 sq.ft.)
Medium-Small (1 ,201-1,600 sq.ft.)
Medium (1,601 -2,400 sq.ft.)
Large (>2,400 sq.ft.)
Multi-Fam ily Residential, Senior
Very Small (<800 sq.ft.)
Small (801-1,200 sq.ft.)
Medium-Small (1 ,2O1-1,600 sq.ft.)
Medium (1,601 -2,400 sq.ft.)
Large (>2,400 sq.ft.)
Accessory Dwelling Units
Very Small (<750 sq.ft.)
Otherwise (>750 sq ft.)
Office Use
Retail Use
lndustrial Use
Hotel/Motel
Extended Stay Hotel/Motel
Hospital
Service Station
Supermarket
Exempt from fee
Fee is based on the ratio of the
floor area of the ADU comPared to
the primary unit, times the fee that
would be charged on the Primary
unit, if the primary unit was being
newly built.
$1,807 1,000 square feet
$2,361 1,000 square feet
$827 1,000 square feet
$854 sleeping room
$559 sleeping room
$1,796 1,000 square feet
$3,442 Fuel Pump
$1,078 1,000 square feet
$1,088
$1,334
$1,451
$1,574
$1,730
per unit
per unit
per unit
per unit
per unit
$497
$60e
$663
$719
$790
$ee5
$1,221
$1,327
$1,440
$1,582
$440
$540
$587
$637
$700
per unit
per unit
per unit
per unit
per unit
per unit
per unit
per unit
per unit
per unit
per unit
per unit
per unit
per unit
per unit
SCTMFP: Agreement on Operating Protocols
STA & Entity
5

12/10/2024 Item No.18.

Warehouse/Self-Storage
Assisted Living Facility
Congregate Care
Child Day Care
Private School (K-12)
Auto Repair/Body ShoP
Gym/Fitness Center
Drive-through Car Wash
Normalized Cost per TriP
(All Other Uses)
Nofes;
$238
$434
$368
$682
$414
$2,361
$2,361
$2,361
1,000 square feet
bed
unit
Student
Student
1,000 square feet
1,000 square feet
1,000 square feet

2.2 $167 Per Weekday Trip

1. For developments that do not fall into the land use categories above, the normalized cost per trip rate should be used to determine the fee based on the daily trips generated by the development.

2. For mixed-use developmenfg see ltem 2.3 for fee calculation procedures.

3. For devetopments that are anticipated to have reduced trip generation characteristics, such as fhose in infillareas orfhose with restricted parking, see Item 2.4 for fee calculation procedures.

4. For devetopments in proximity to transit, see ltem 2.5 for fee calculation procedures.

Annual Adjustment. The STA shall annually adjust the SCTMFP Fee schedule to reflect change in construction costs based on the McGraw-Hill Engineering News Record (ENR) 2O-City Construction Cost lndex. The adjustment will take effect July 1, and STA shall notify the Entity of the required annual adjustment at least 60 days in advance of the effective date.

2.3 Calculation of Fee for Mixed Use Projects. For Projects that include two or more different types of uses, the amount of the fee imposed on the entire Development Project shall be proportionally determined based on the relative footprint associated with the various uses'

2.4 Reduced Fees for Reduced Trip Generation. Developments in infill areas or with reduced parking availability, as defined by the Entity, may be subject to reduced fees at the discretion of the Entity. The Entity shall provide the rationale for reduced fees based on a supporting Traffic Study stamped by a licensed Tratfic Engineer or Civil Engineer.

2.5 Fees for Transit Oriented Development. ln accordance with the CGC Section 66005.1, the SCTMFP must provide for an adjustment of the fee for developments that meet certain characteristics typically associated with a Transit Orient Development (TOD). To qualify for the reduction, a development must have all of the following characteristics (see CGC Section 66005.1.(a)):
a) Be a housing development located within one-half mile of a transit station with direct access between the housing development and the transit station along a barrier-free walkable pathway not exceeding one-half mile in length.

SCTMFP: Agreement on Operating Protocols
STA & Entity
6

12/10/2024 Item No.18.
b) Convenience retail uses, including a store that sells food, are located within one-half mile of the housing development.
c) The housing development provides either the minimum number of parking spaces required by the local ordinance, or no more than one onsite parking Space for zero to two bedroom units, and two onsite parking spaces for three or more bedroom units, whichever is less.

Additionally, pursuant to CGC 66005.1(b), if a housing development does not satisfy the characteristics in subdivision (a) per above, the local agency may charge a fee that is proportional to the estimated rate of automobile trip generation associated with the housing development.

Residential units satisfying the requirements for this reduction shall have their fee lowered based on a Traffic Study, stamped by a licensed Traffic or Civil Engineer, which demonstrates the lower rate of automobile trip generation associated with a TOD and other similar types of development compared to developments without these characteristics. STA may provide a standard TOD reduction based on studies related to TODs. The applicant could then either use the standard reduction or provide a project-specific study for STA staff to review.

For example, within Sacramento County, a transit station could include, but is not limited to, the Zinfandel Station, Franklin Station, Consumnes River Light Rail Station, and Sacramento Valley Station which serves Amtrak, Bus, and Light Rail (Sacramento Regional Transit), and the future Valley Rail station in midtown Sacramento.

3.0 ENTITY OBLIGATIONS.

3.1 Obligations prior to January 1,2025. The Entity shall take all necessary steps required by applicable law, including but not limited to CGC 66000 et seq., to enable implementation of the SCTMFP Fee no later than January 1, 2025. This includes advance noticing requirements for and the adoption of such fees by the Entity via a public hearing, as described below:

CGC S 66016.5(a)(7): All studies shall be adopted at a public hearing with at least 30 days' notice, and the Entity shall notify any member of the public that requests notice of intent to begin an impact fee nexus study of the date of the hearing.

CGC S 66016.6(a): Prior to levying a new fee or capacity charge, a local agency shall evaluate the amount of the fee or capacity charge. The evaluation shall include evidence to support that the fee or capacity charge does not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing service, in accordance with Section 66013. (b) All information constituting the evaluation shall be made publicly available at least 14 SCTMFP: Agreement on Operating Protocols
STA & Entity
7

12/10/2024 Item No.18.

3.2 days prior to a meeting held in accordance with subdivision (a) of Section 66016.

Failure to meet such legal requirements shall not exempt the Entity from the requirement that SCTMFP Fees be collected as a prerequisite to the Entity's receipt of Measure A local street and road maintenance formula funds.

Ongoing Obligations. The Entity shall take all necessary steps required by applicable law for posting the fee schedule, annual fee reports, nexus studies, and total amount of fees collected, to its internet website, pursuant to CGC 65940.1, which states.
(1) A city, county, or special district that has an internet website shall make all of the following available on its internet website, as applicable:
(AXi) A current schedule of fees, exactions, and affordability requirements imposed by that city, county, or special district, including any dependent special districts, as defined in Section 56032.5, of the city or county applicable to a proposed housing development project.
(ii) The city, county, or special district shall present the information described in clause (i) in a manner that clearly identifies the fees, exactions, and affordability requirements that apply to each parcel (iii) The city, county, or special district shall post a written fee schedule or a link directly to the written fee schedule on its internet website.
(B) All zoning ordinances and development standards adopted by the city or county presenting the information, which shall specify the zoning, design, and development standards that apply to each parcel.
(C) The list required to be compiled pursuant to Section 65940 by the city or county presenting the information.
(D) The current and five previous annual fee reports or the current and five previous annual financial reports, that were required pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 66006 and subdivision (d) of Section 66013.
(E) An archive of impact fee nexus studies, cost of service studies, or equivalent, conducted by that city, county, or special district on or after January 1,2018. For purposes of this subparagraph, "cost SCTMFP: Agreement on Operating Protocols
STA & Entity

12/10/2024 Item No.18.
of service study" means the data provided to the public pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 66016.
(2) A city, county, or special district shall update the information made available under this subdivision within 30 days of any changes. (3) (A) A city or county shall request from a development proponent, upon issuance of a certificate of occupancy or the final inspection, whichever occurs last, the total amount of fees and exactions associated with the project for which the certificate was issued. The city or county shall post this information on its internet website and update it at least twice per year.
(B) A city or county shall not be responsible for the accuracy for the information received and posted pursuant to subparagraph (A). A city or county may include a disclaimer regarding the accuracy of the information posted on its internet website under this paragraph.

4.0 COLLECTION OF SCTMFP FEES

4.1 Collection of Fees
a. The Entity shall collect SCTMFP Fees at the time of issuance of a final building permit for a Development Project, at the same time it collects its own fees, or as othenrvise required or permitted pursuant to CGC Section 66007.
b. The amount of the SCTMFP Fees shall reflect the Fee schedule in effect at the time of assessment.
c. SCTMFP Fees shall not be waived or deferred except as provided herein.

Payment by all Development Projects. Except as othenryise expressly provided by this Amended Agreement, the SCTMFP Fee shall be payable by all Development Projects within the jurisdiction of the Entity for which building permits are issued on or after April 1,2009.

4.2 4.3 Fee Reduction Determinations. Determinations by the Entity to reduce the fee pursuant to Sections 2.3, 2.4, 2.5 or 4.5 shall be subject to STA oversight and guidance as described herein. ln semi-annual reports to the STA Executive Director, the Entity shall identify each project, if any, that has been granted a fee reduction and the amount of discounted fees. The decisions of the Entity as to fee reductions under this provision shall also be subject to audit by the STA.

SCTMFP: Agreement on Operating Protocols
STA & Entity
9

12/10/2024 Item No.18.

4.4 The STA Executive Director reserves the right to review the grant of a fee reduction by a localjurisdiction under this provision in circumstances where the above requirements are not clearly met, although the STA Executive Director may not exercise any direct jurisdiction or action in a particular fee protest between Entity and payor pursuant to CGC Section 66020. ln the event of a fee protest pursuant to CGC Section 66020, the localjurisdiction shall make the final determination with respect to application of the fee and any potential fee reductions. The Executive Director may subsequently review the fee reduction and, following consultation with Entity, determine, in the Executive Director's reasonable discretion, that a fee reduction was not supported under the SCTMFP protocols or applicable law and that a corresponding amount of SCTMFP revenue shall be withheld from Entity. The Executive Director's decision shall have no effect on the amount of the fee charged by Entity to the payor.

At the request of the Entity, the STA Executive Director may resolve questions of interpretation regarding this policy. At the time the fee reductions are assessed, the Entity may request guidance from the STA Executive Director.

Exemptions from the SCTMFP Fees. The following Development Projects shall not be subject to the SCTMFP Fee:
a. Accessory Dwelling Units less than 750 square feet'
b. The rehabilitation or reconstruction of any residential or non- residential structure where there is no net increase in square footage.

Any increase in square footage shall pay the established applicable fee rate for that portion of square footage that is new. c. New low-income housing as defined in Health and Safety Code Section 50079.5 and very low-income housing as defined in Health and Safety Code Section 50105.
d. Projects intended for public use where the applicant is one of the Participating Agencies.
e. Any development project that is subject of a valid development agreement entered into pursuant to CGC Section 65864 prior to April 1 , 2009, that includes a provision exempting it from future fees or fee increases; provided, however, that if the term of such a development agreement is extended after April 1, 2009, the SCTMFP shall be imposed.

SCTMFP: Agreement on Operating Protocols
STA & Entity
10

12/10/2024 Item No.18.
f. Any development project for which an application for a vesting tentative map authorization by CGC Section 66498.1 was deemed complete prior to April 1, 2009.

4.5 Re-purposing/Reuse of existing buildings. Fee applicable only to net increase in ADT's compared to prior established use.
a. Determination of average daily trips ("ADT's") for the purpose of comparing previous and proposed uses shall be by reference to trip generation rates obtained from the lnstitute of Traffic Engineers ("lTE').
b. A building permit applicant may request a reduction in the otherwise applicable SCTMFP fee in accordance with the following policy:

Where a new project changes the prior established use of an existing building, a reduction may be applied to the SCTMFP fee where the new use increases ADT's compared to the prior use.
c. Where the Entity determines that a project qualifies for a reduction pursuant to this policy, it shall determine the fee reduction by comparing the rates applicable to the prior and new uses as designated in the SCTMFP Fee Schedule and calculating the resulting offset. ln the alternative, where a proposed land use is not clearly listed in the Fee Schedule, the fee shall be calculated as follows: (1) calculate the difference between previous ADT's and new ADT's at the property; (2) multiply the result by the normalized cost per trip.
d. Requests for a fee reduction pursuant to this provision shall be made to the Entity. The Entity shall determine whether a project has made the required showing for a fee reduction. There shall be no right to an appeal. At the time the fee reductions are assessed, the Entity may request guidance from the STA Executive Director.

5.0 REMITTANCE OF FEES
The Entity shall remit SCTMFP Fees collected to the Authority on a semi-annual basis, within 60 days after June 30 and December 31 of each calendar year. Each remittance shall be accompanied by a report specifying the fee-generating activity for the reporting period within the Entity's jurisdiction, including information as to all permits issued by use, square footage, any exemptions or reductions granted, and such other information as may be deemed appropriate by the Executive Director. The Entity collecting the SCT[i4FP Fees shall hold them in an interest- bearing account and any interest earned shall be remitted to the Authority with the semi-annual SCTMFP Fees. The Executive Director shall separately account for the Entity's SCTMFP Fees as part of the aggregate SCTMFP account and will SCTMFP: Agreement on Operating Protocols
STA & Entity
IT

12/10/2024 Item No.18.
prepare annual reports for presentation to the lndependent Taxpayer Oversight Committee and the STA Governing Board.

6.0 AUDIT OF SCTMFP REVENUES
The Executive Director, in coordination with the lndependent Taxpayer Oversight Committee, shall establish a program to audit the Entity's implementation of the SCTMFP and STA's expenditure of the SCTMFP Fees.

7.0 EXPENDITURE OF FEES
STA shall distribute SCTMFP Fees received, and any proceeds of Fee-based financing(s), to the local jurisdictions for expenditure in accordance with the Ordinance, a S-year capital program annually updated and approved by the STA Governing Board, applicable resolutions of the STA, Measure A allocation and expenditure contracts between the STA and localjurisdictions, and AB 1600.

8.0 ADMINISTRATION COSTS
The STA and Entity each shall absorb their administrative costs associated with the implementation and administration of the SCTMFP Fee and this Agreement.

The Entity, at its discretion, may impose an additionalfee on affected development to pay for administrative costs of implementing the SCTMFP.

9.0 REPORTS
STA shall prepare annual and five-year reports required by CGC Sections 66000 et seq. and AB 602 relating to the SCTMFP Fees. Entity shall provide any necessary assistance and data.
1O.O MISCELLANEOUS

10.1 lf any one or more of the terms or provisions of this Agreement shall be adjudged invalid, unenforceable, void or voidable by a court of competent jurisdiction, each and all remaining terms and provisions of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby and shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law.

10.2 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which, together, shall constitute one and the same instrument.

SCTMFP: Agreement on Operating Protocols
STA & Entity
12

12/10/2024 Item No.18.

By

SACRAMENTO TRANS PORTATION AUTHORITY
Kevin Bewsey
Executive Director
Dated: Auqust 8. 2024
Entity Name
(Authorized Officer)
(Title)
Dated
Approved as to Form Attest:

By:

SCTMFP: Agreement on Operating Protocols
STA & Entity
13

12/10/2024 Item No.18.

This page is intentionallA left blonk
to facilitate double- sided printing
snd minimize paper ttse.

CITY OF
DISTINCTIVE B.Y NATURE

FOLSONI

12/10/2024 Item No.18.
{'
Folsom City Council
Staff Re rt
MEETING DATE: t21t012024
AGENDA SECTION: Public Hearing
SUBJECT: Hillsborough Area 40Larye-Lot Subdivision Map - Vicinity of Prairie City Road and Mangini Parkway in the Folsom Plan Area (suBPM22-001s9)
I Resolution No. 11308 - A Resolution to Adopt an
Addendum to the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan EIR/EIS
and Approve aLarge-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map for
the Hillsborough Area 40 Large-Lot Subdivision Map
Project
FROM: Community Development Department

RECOMMENDATION / COIINCIL ACTION
Staff forwards the Planning Commission's recommendation that the City Council take the following action:

1. Approve Resolution No. 1 1308 Adopting an Addendum to the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan EIR/EIS and Approving aLarge-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map for the Hillsborough Area40 Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Project.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
The applicant, Aerojet Rocketdyne Inc., is requesting approval of a Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map (LLTSM) to subdivide a 148.2-acre parcel located in the vicinity of Prairie City Road and Mangini Parkway, within the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan (FPASP), into seven (7) individual parcels for future sale and development. No development rights are sought with the proposed LLTSM. The proposed LLTSM will result in the creation of a total of 7 lots, most of which will continue to include multiple Specific Plan land use designations. The proposed project also includes the dedication of Rights-of-Ways and Public Utility Easements to allow for development of future roadways and associated infrastructure improvements. It is important to 1

12/10/2024 Item No.19.
note that the proposed large lots approximate the project area's Specific Plan land use designations and FPASP parcels, but do not adhere perfectly to them. This is due to several factors including anticipated roadway realignments and mapping efficiency. No land use changes or modifications are proposed with this project. The applicant states that future parcel configuration will be consistent with the approved Land Use Plan. If that is infeasible then General Plan andlor Specific Plan Amendments (or Minor Administrative Modifications, if applicable) will be sought to bring the land uses and parcel lines into conformance. The Planning Commission considered this project at its October 30, 2024, meeting and unanimously recommended City Council approval (Attachment 3).

POLICY / RULE
The Folsom Municipal Code (FMC) requires that applications for Tentative Subdivision Maps be forwarded to the City Council for final action. City Council actions regarding Tentative Subdivision Maps are covered under Section 16.16'080 of the FMC.

ANALYSIS
General Plan and Specific Plan Consistency
The 148.2-acre project site has multiple General Plan land use designations including:
. SF (Single-Family)
. SFHD (Single-Family High Density)
. MHD (Multi-Family High Density)
. OS (Open Space)
o P (Park)
In addition, the project site has multiple Specific Plan designations including:
. SP-SF-PD (Specific Plan-Single-Family-Planned Development Permit District) . SP-SFHD-PD (Specific Plan-Single-Family High Density-Planned Development Permit District)
. SP-MHD-PD (SpecificPlan-Multi-FamilyHighDensity-PlannedDevelopmentDistrict) . SP-OSI (Specific Plan-Preserve Open Space)
. SP-OS2 (Specific Plan-Passive Open Space)
. SP-P (Parks)
The existing General Plan and the Specific Plan land use designations are consistent with each other and are not proposed to change as part ofthis project.

As no development is proposed with this specific application, the only relevant development standard applicable to the subdivision map is minimum lot area. The minimum required lot area for these properties ranges from 4,000 square feet for the SP-SFHD-PD designated parcel up to

0.5-acres for the SP-MHD-PD designated parcel, with no minimum lot size requirements being applicable to the SP-OS1, SP-OS2, and SP-P designated parcels. Staff has determined that the proposed project meets the minimum lot area requirement as all seven of the newly created parcels exceed the minimum lot size requirement based on their individual Specific Plan designations. In addition, staff has determined that the proposed project will not conflict with any known applicable plans or policies by agencies with jurisdiction over the project or the project site. 2 Page 300
12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map
The primary purpose of the proposed project is to accommodate the sale, lease, and financing of the newly ueated large lots in accordance with the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act. No development rights are being requested, and to that effect, there is a note on the Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map stating that.

In most cases, future small-lot tentative maps will further subdivide the large parcels of land into smaller lots consistent with the FPASP land use and allocation map. These future tentative maps and/or entitlements will seek development rights after the transfer of land to the developer is completed. The future parcel configurations will be consistent with the approved FPASP land use plan and will establish discreet parcels of land based on the FPASP land use boundaries (meaning, the future maps will create lots with singular land use designations, versus this LLTSM where there are large lots with multiple land use designations). Large lots with multiple land use designations exist throughout the FPASP; in most cases, it is with individual small-lot tentative maps that the smaller lots are created to be consistent with the FPASP land use boundaries.

Processing and approval of a Small-Lot Tentative and Final Map and Planned Development Permit applications or other appropriate entitlements will be required prior to grading, construction, or any development of the parcels created by this Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map.

Staff has determined that the proposed Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map complies with all City requirements (Folsom Municipal Code [FMC], Chapter 16.16), as well as with the requirements of the State Subdivision Map Act.

FINAN IMPACT
No financial impact is anticipated with the approval of the Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map as the project will not result in any changes to the total number of residential units within the FPASP.

ENVIRO AI, REVIEW
An Environmental lmpact Report/Environmental lmpact Study (EIR/EIS) was previously adopted by the City Council for the FPASP on June 28, 2011, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). An Addendum to the FPASP EIR/EIS was subsequently adopted by the City Council on May 24, 2016, for the Hillsborough Specific Plan Amendment project. The Addendum concluded that the Hillsborough SPA would not result in any new or substantially more severe environmental impacts as compared to the FPASP EIR/EIS. A Subsequent EIR was adopted by the City Council for the City of Folsom General Plan Amendments for Increased Residential Capacity Projects on August 27 ,2024. The project changed approximately 13 acres in the project area from the Community Commercial land use designation to the Multifamily High Density land use designation.

An Addendum to the FPASP EIR/EIS was prepared for this project on September 17,2024, that found the potential impacts of the proposed LLTSM project to be adequately addressed by the FPASP EIR/EIS, Hillsborough SPA Addendum, and City of Folsom General Plan Amendments a
J Page 301
12/10/2024 Item No.19.
for Increased Residential Capacity Project Subsequent EIR (Attachment 8). Based on the analysis in the Addendum, the City has determined that the previously prepared environmental documents fully address all the impacts of the proposed project. All mitigation measures applicable to the project still apply, and no new mitigation measures are needed. Therefore, staff recommend that the City Council adopt the Addendum to the FPASP EIR/EIS'

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution No. 11308 - A Resolution to Adopt an Addendum to the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan EIR/EIS and Approve a Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map for the Hillsborough Area 40Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Project

2. Planning Commission Staff Report, dated October 30,2024

3. Minutes from October 30, 2024, Planning Commission Meeting

4. Vicinity Map

5. Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map, dated August 9,2024

6. Land Use Overlay, dated August 20,2024

7. Project Narrative, dated August 9,2024

8. Addendum to the FPASP EIR/EIS, dated September 17,2024 Submitted,

PAM JOHNS
Community Development Director
4 Page 302
12/10/2024 Item No.19.

ATTACHMENT I
A Resolution To Adopt an Addendum to the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan EIVEIS And Approve A Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map And Addendum For The Hillsborough Area 40 Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Proj ect

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

RESOLUTION NO. 11308

A RESOLUTION TO ADOPT AN ADDENDUM TO THE FOLSOM PLAN AREA

SPECIFIC PLAN EIR/EIS AND APPROVE A LARGE-LOT TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR THE HILLSBOROUGH AREA 40 LARGE-LOT

SUBDIVISION MAP PROJECT
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission on October 30, 2024, held a public hearing on the proposed Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map, considered public comment and, based on the proposed configuration of the seven large-lot parcels, determined the proposed subdivision complies with alt City requirements, as well as with the requirements of the State Subdivision Map Act; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission on October 30, 2024, held a public hearing on the proposed Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map and related Addendum to the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan (FPASP) Environmental Impact Report/Environmental lmpact Statement (EIR/EIS), considered public comment, and determined that the Project is consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the City of Folsom General Plan; and WHEREAS, notice has been given at the time and in the manner required by State Law and City Code; and
WHEREAS, an Addendum to the FPASP EIR/EIS has been prepared for the Hillsborough Area 40 Large-Lot Subdivision Map project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom hereby adopts the Addendum to the FPASP EIR/EIS for the Hillsborough Area 40 Latge-Lot Subdivision Map project; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom hereby approves aLarge-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map creating seven large-lot parcels, as shown in Exhibit "A"; afld
These approvals are all subject to the conditions of approval attached as Exhibit "B" and this Resolution is based on the following findings:

GENERAL FINDINGS
A. NOTICE OF HEARING HAS BEEN GIVEN AT THE TIME AND IN THE MANNER REQUIRED BY STATE LAW AND CITY CODE.

THE PROJECT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN AND THE FOLSOM PLAN AREA SPECIFIC PLAN.

Resolution No. 11308

B

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

C.

D

CEQA FINDINGS

THE CITY, AS LEAD AGENCY, PREVIOUSLY CERTIFIED AN ENVIRONMENTAL

IMPACT REPORT/ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE FOLSOM PLAN AREA SPECIFIC PLAN.

THE CITY HAS DETERMINE,D THAT THE HILLSBOROUGH AREA 40 LARGE-

LOT TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP PROJECT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE FOLSOM PLAN AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AS AMENDED.

TTIE CITY HAS DETERMINED THAT NONE OF THE CIRCUMSTANCES DESCRIBED IN PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE SECTION 21166 OR CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15 162 GENERALLY REQUIRING THE PREPARATION OF A SUBSEQUENT EIR EXIST IN THIS CASE.

THE CITY HAS PREPARED AN ADDENDUM TO THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL

IMPACT REPORT/ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (EIR/EIS) FOR THE

FOLSOM PLAN AREA SPECIFIC PLAN (FPASP) AND HAS DETERMINED THAT

THE PROJECT CREATES NO NEW IMPACTS AND DOES NOT REQUIRE ANY

MITIGATION MEASURES IN ADDITION TO THOSE IN THE FINAL
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT.

G THE CITY HAS DETERMINE,D THAT THE IMPACTS OF THE HILLSBOROUGH AREA 40 LARGE-LOT TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP PROJECT ARE

ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED BY THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT

REPORT FOR THE FOLSOM PLAN AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AS WELL AS THE

SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE GENERAL PLAN AND FOLSOM PLAN AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS.

H THE PLANNING COMMISSION HAS CONSIDERED THE ADDENDUM TO THE

FPASP EIR/EIS WITH THE FINAL EIR BEFORE MAKING A DECISION ON THE PROJECT.

TENTATIVE SUBDI\ISION MAP FINDINGS
I. THE PROPOSED LARGE,-LOT TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP IS CONSISTENT

WITH THE CITY'S SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE AND THE SUBDIVISION MAP

ACT IN THAT THE PROJECT IS SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THAT

WILL ENSURE THAT THE PROJECT IS DEVELOPED IN COMPLIANCE WITH CITY STANDARDS.

THE PROPOSED SUBDIVISION, TOGETHER WITH THE PROVISIONS FOR ITS

DESIGN AND IMPROVEMENT, IS CONSISTENT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN,

THE FOLSOM PLAN AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AS AMENDED, AND ALL
APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE FOLSOM MLINICIPAL CODE.

Resolution No. 11308
Page2 of 16
E.

F
J

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

L.

M.

K.

N
vote
AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

AS CONDITIONED, THE DESIGN OF THE LARGE-LOT TENTATIVE

SUBDIVISION MAP AND THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ARE NOT LIKELY

TO CAUSE SUBSTANTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE OR SUBSTANTIAL AND TINAVOIDABLE INJURY TO FISH OR WILDLIFE OR THEIR HABITAT.

AS CONDITIONED, THE DESIGN OF THE LARGE-LOT TENTATIVE

SUBDIVISION MAP AND THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ARE NOT LIKELY TO CAUSE SERIOUS PUBLIC HEALTH OR SAFETY PROBLEMS.

THE DESIGN OF THE LARGE-LOT TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP AND THE

TYPE OF IMPROVEMENTS WILL NOT CONFLICT WITH EASEMENTS FOR

ACCESS THROUGH OR USE OF PROPERTY WITHIN THE PROPOSED
SUBDIVISION.

SUBJECT TO SECTION 66474.4 OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT, THE LAND IS

NOT SUBJECT TO A CONTRACT ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO THE
CALIFORNIA LAND CONSERVATION ACT OF 1965 (COMMENCING WITH SECTION s1200 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE).
pASSED AND ADOPTED this 1Oth day of December, 2024, by the following roll-call Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

Councilmember(s):

MAYOR
ATTEST:

Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. I1308

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Exhibit A
Large Lot Tentative Subdivision Map
Resolution No. 11308

12/10/2024 Item No.19.
gI Jo I oSed
gOEI I 'oN uorlnlosou
Qf Yluy- - HcnQ_uQEs]1lH.
dvw Nolsl^lc8ns 3^llvlNSr
rol 3cuvl
#ilrryq
#
--l#i*"--{9!i
i;
I
-Tt't*lim-9. 1,.'c,.".-lrng'"':.1 J
i
-l
I
iat
;93
,:

I
lrii-li.it!-
;i
gtoN dvw : ilvtNlt
wfr&s avw l^tvlNSl

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Exhibit B
Conditions of Approval
Resolution No. 11308

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR THE HILLSBOROUGH AREA 40 LLTSM PROJECT (PN 22-00159)

VICINITY OF PRAIRIE CITY ROAD AND MANGINI PARKWAY

LARGE-LOT TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
Mitigation
Measure
When Responsible
uired

GENERAL
1 Final Map
The applicant shall submit a Large-Lot Final Map to the Community Development Department that shall substantially conform to the exhibits referenced below:

1. Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map, dated August 9,2024

2. Land Use Overlay, dated October 8,2024 M, OG cD (EXP) The Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map is approved for the creation of seven (7) individual lots (Hillsborough Area 40 Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Project).

Implementation of the project shall be consistent with the above-referenced items, the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan (FPASP) as Amended, the Hillsborough Specific Plan Amendment Per Ordinance No. 1254-1258, and these conditions of approval.

The final map shall delineate the area shown as Lot 38 in the FPASP and reference the Remedial Action Plan for said site
cD (EXP)M
90-Day Protest Period
The conditions ofproject approval set forth herein include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d), these conditions constitute written notice of the amount of such fees, and a description ofthe dedications, reservations and other exactions.

The applicant is hereby notified that the 90-day protest period, commencing from the date of approval ofthe project, has begun. Ifthe applicant fails to file a protest regarding any of the fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements or other exaction contained in this notice, complying with all the requirements of Government Code Section 66020, the applicant will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions.
2 Resolution No. 11308

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

CONDTTIONS OF APPROVAL FOR THE HTLLSBOROUGH AREA 40 LLTSM PROJECT (PN 22-001 se)

VICINITY OF PRAIRIE CITY ROAD AND MANGINI PARKWAY

LARGE-LOT TENTATIVE SUBDTVISION MAP
Responsible
Department
cD (EXP)
cD (PXEXB)

PW, PR, FD,
PD
When
Required
M
OG
No Development Rights
The approval of this Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map does not convey any right to develop. Processing and approval of a Small-Lot Final Map and/or Design ReviewlPlanned Development Permit applications shall be required prior to grading, construction, or any development of the parcels created by this Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map.

As a condition of a subsequent Small-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map, the City shall identifu improvements necessary to develop the subject parcels. These improvements may include on and off-site roadways, water, sewer, storm drainage, landscaping, soundwalls, and other similar improvements
Indemnity.for City
The owner/applicant shall defend, indemnif', and hold harmless the City and its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul any approval by the City or any of its agencies, departments, commissions, agents, officers, employees, or legislative body concerning the project, which claim, action or proceeding is brought within the time period provided therefore in Government Code Section 66499.37 or other applicable statutes of limitation. The City will promptly notif' the owner/applicant of any such claim, action or proceeding, and will cooperate fully in the defense. The City may, within its unlimited discretion, participate in the defense of any such claim, action or proceeding if both of the following occur:

The City bears its own attorney's fees and costs; and
The City defends the claim, action or proceeding in good faith The owner/applicant shall not be required to pay or perform any settlement of such claim, action or proceeding unless the settlement is approved by the owner/applicant.

The owner/applicant's obligations under this condition shall apply regardless of whether a Final ls recorded with to this
Mitigation
Measure
3 4
Resolution No. 11308

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR THE HILLSBOROUGH AREA 40 LLTSM PROJECT (PN 22-001s9)

VICINITY OF PRAIRIE CITY ROAD AND MANGINI PARKWAY

LARGE-LOT TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
Responsible
Department
cD (EXP)
cD (PXE)
cD (E)(P)
cD (E)
cD (E)
cD(E)
When
Required
M
M
M
M
M
M
Street Numes
The Applicant shall use street names as shown in the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan, and in the case of unnamed streets, select street names from the City's approved list or subsequently approved by the Planning Commission for the final subdivision map ARDA andAmendments
The owner/Applicant shall comply with all provisions of Amendment No. 1 to the First Amended and Restated Tier 1 Development Agreement and any approved amendments thereafter by and between the City and the licant of the ect Public Right of Way Dedication
As provided for in the Amended and Restated Development Agreement (ARDA) and Amendment No. I thereto, and any approved amendments thereafter, at recordation of Final Map the owner/applicant shall offer to dedicate all public rights-of-way such that public access is provided to each and every lot as shown on the Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map.

Public Utility Easements
The Owner/Applicant shall dedicate public utility easements for underground facilities on properties adjacent to public and private streets. A minimum of twelve and one-half- foot (12.5') wide Public Utility easements for underground facilities (i'e., SMUD PG&E, cable television, telephone) shall be dedicated adjacent to all public and private street rights-of-way. The owner/applicant shall dedicate additional width to accommodate extraordinary facilities as determined by the City. The width of the public utility easements adjacent to public and private right of way may be reduced with prior approval from public utility companies
FMC Compliance
The Final Large-Lot Map shall comply with the Folsom Municipal Code and the Subdivision Map Act.

Single Phase
The Final Large-Lot Map shall be recorded in one phase
Mitigation
Measure
5 6
7 8.
o
01 Resolution No. I1308

12/10/2024 Item No.19.
coNDrTroNS oF AppRovAL FOR THE HTLLSBOROUGII AREA 40 LLTSM PROJECT (PN 22-00159)

VICINITY OF PRAIRIE CITY ROAD AND MANGINI PARKWAY

LARGE-LOT TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
Responsible
Denartment
11 12
Validity
The project approval granted under this staff report (Large Lot Tentative Subdivision Map) shall remain in effect for a period of twenty-fow (24) months (December 10, 2026) pursuant to Section 16.16.110A of the Folsom Municipal Code and the Subdivision Map Act. If a Final Map is not recorded within the identified time frame and/or the applicant has not demonstrated substantial progress towards the development of the project, this approval shall be considered null and void. The owner/applicant may file an application with the Community Development Department for an extension not less than 60 days prior to the expiration date of the approval, along with appropriate fees and necessary submittal materials pursuant to Section 16.16.120 of the Folsom Municipal Code. If after approval of this project, a lawsuit is filed which seeks to invalidate any approval or entitlement authorized by the project approvals, or to enjoin the project contemplated herein, or to challenge the issuance by any governmental agency of any environmental document or exemption determination, the two-year period referenced in FMC 16.16.1104 for finaling the map shall be tolled during the time that any litigation is pending, including any appeals.

In the event of a conflict between this Condition and language of Amendment No. 1 to the First Amended and Restated Tier 1 Development Agreement (ARDA), the ARDA shall control.

DEVELOPMENT COSTS AND FEE UIREMENTS
Toxes and Fees
The owner/applicant shall pay all applicable taxes, fees and charges for the project at the rate and amount required by the Public Facilities Financing Plan and the Amended and Restated
M
M
cD(E)
cD (PXE)
cD (E)
When
Required
MAssessments
If applicable, the owner/applicant shall pay off any existing assessments against the property, or file necessary segregation request and pay applicable fees Mitigation
Measure
31 Resolution No. 11308
Page l0 of 16 Page 313
12/10/2024 Item No.19.

CONDITTONS OF APPROVAL FOR THE HILLSBOROUGH AREA 40 LLTSM PROJECT (PN 22-001s9) VICINITY OF PRAIRIE CITY ROAD AND MAi\GINI PARKWAY

LARGE-LOT TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
Responsible
Department
cD (PXE)
cD (P) PW, PK
When
Required
M
M
Consultant Services
If the City utilizes the services of consultants to prepare special studies or provide specialized design review or inspection services for the project, the applicant shall reimburse the City for actual costs it incurs in utilizing these services, including administrative costs for City personnel. A deposit for these services shall be provided prior to initiating review of mapping documents, building plans, improvement plans, or besinnins inspection, whichever is applicable.

FPASP Development Impact Fee
The owner/applicant shall be subject to all Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan Area development impact fees in place at the time of approval or subsequently adopted consistent with the Public Facilities Financing Plan (PFFP), Development Agreement and amendments thereto, unless exempt by previous agreement. The owner/applicant shall be subject to all applicable Folsom Plan Area plan-wide development impact fees in effect at such time that a building permit is issued. These fees may include, but are not limited to, the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan Fee, Specific Plan Infrastructure Fee (SPIF), Solid Waste Fee, Corporation Yard Fee, Transportation Management Fee, Transit Fee, Highway 50 Interchange Fee, General Park Equipment Fee, Housing Trust Fee, etc.

Any protest to such for all fees, dedications, reservations or other exactions imposed on this project will begin on the date of final approval (November 20,2024)0, or otherwise shall be governed by the terms of Amendment No. 1 to the ARDA. The fees shall be calculated at the fee rate set forth in the PFFP and the ARDA.

Mitigation
Measure
1 4
'15.

Resolution No. 11308
Page ll of 16 Page 314
12/10/2024 Item No.19.
cD (PXE)
Responsible
Department
cD (PXE)
M
When
Required
M
Mitigation Meusures
The Hillsborough Area 40 Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map project shall be subject to all mitigation measures identified in the FPASP (May 2011) MMRP, as amended by the Revised Proposed Water Supply Facility Alternative (November 2012), Folsom South of U.S. Highway 50 Backbone Infrastructure Mitigated Negative Declaration (December 2014),the Westland Eagle Specific Plan Amendment (September 2015), Hillsborough GPA/SPA Addendum (May 2016), City of Folsom General Plan Amendments for Increased Residential Capacity Subsequent EIR, and the Hillsborough Area 40 Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Addendum
Outside Legal Counsel
The City, at its sole discretion, may utilize the services of outside legal counsel to assist in the implementation of this project, including, but not limited to, drafting, reviewing and/or revising agreements andlor other documentation for the project. If the City utilizes the services of such outside legal counsel, the applicant shall reimburse the City for all outside legal fees and costs incurred by the City for such services. The applicant may be required, at the sole discretion of the City Attorney, to submit a deposit to the City for these services prior to initiation of the services. The applicant shall be responsible for reimbursement to the City for the services regardless of whether a deposit is required.

Mitigation
Measure
MAP
17 CoNDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR THE HILLSBOROUGII AREA 40 LLTSM PROJECT (PN 22-001s9)

VICINITY OF PRAIRIE CITY ROAD AND MANGINI PARKWAY

LARGE-LOT TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
61 Resolution No. 11308

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

CONDITTONS OF APPROVAL FOR THE HILLSBOROUGH AREA 40 LLTSM PROJECT (PN 22-00159)

VICINITY OF PRAIRIE CITY ROAD AND MANGINI PARKWAY

LARGE-LOT TENTATTVE SUBDIVISION MAP
Responsible
Department
cD (E)
cD (E)
cD (E)
When
Required
M
M
M
Affordable Ho using Deed Restriction
A note shall be placed on the Final Map as follows:

Lot 5 as shown on the Large Lot Tentative Subdivision Map (1j.9-acre parcel) is subj ect to deed restriction for affordable housing purposes. Said deed restriction shall require a minimum area of 10 acres of said lot to be deed-restricted for the development of not less than 320 multi-family housing units affordable to low-, very-low, and/or extremely-low income households (as those terms are defined in Sections 50079.5, 50093, 50150, and 50106 of the Health and Safety Code) on the subiect property. The 320 multi-family affordable housing units shall be deed restricted for a period of at Ieast 55 years from the date ofrecording.

Remediation
A note shall be added to the final map that states:

Portions of this large lot map are located within Aeroiet's Area 40 site, which is currently undergoing remediation. All entitlement requests and development applications located within the Area 40 site require concurrence from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to show that the area has beenfully remediated in accordance with the Final Remedial Action Plan and is now safe and eligible for dev el opment.

An approximate outline of Area 40 within project boundaries is required to be shown on the LLFM, see Condition No. I
FPASP Compliance
A note shall be added to the final map that states
This map is subject to requirements outlined in the Folsom Plan Area Specffic Plan as amended August 27, 2024, and the Hillsborough Specffic Plan Amendment per Ordinance Nos I 2 5 4- I 2 5 B.

Mitigation
Measure
18 1I
20 Resolution No. 11308

12/10/2024 Item No.19.
coNDrrroNs oF APPROVAL FOR THE HTLLSBOROUGH AREA 40 LLTSM PROJECT (PN 22-00159)

VICINITY OF PRAIRIE CITY ROAD AND MANGINI PARKWAY

LARGE-LOT TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
Responsible
Denartment
cD (PXE)
cD (E)
cD (E)
cD (E)
cD (PXE)
When
Required
M
M
OG
OG
M
FPASP Parcel3S
Delineate FPASP Parcel 38 as shown in Figure 4.3- Plan Area Parcels of the FPASP, as amended August 2024, on the Final Map. Any future Small Lot Tentative Map of the area that includes that parcel shall create a new parcel consistent with the boundaries of FPASP Parcel 38 to ensure adequate measures are taken to separate the area from the rest of Community Park West.

Affordable Ho using Deed Restriction
Simultaneous with approval of a Development Plan for Lot 5 as shown on the Large Lot Tentative Subdivision Map (13.9-acre parcel) the owner/applicant shall create and record a deed restriction on a portion ofsaid Lot 5 to restrict use ofsuch property to affordable housing purposes only. Said deed restriction shall be in a form approved by the City Attorney. Said deed restriction shall require a minimum area of 10 acres of said lot to be deed-restricted for the development of not less than 320 multi-family housing units affordable to low-, very-low, andlor extremely-low income households (as those terms are defined in Sections 50079.5,50093, 50150, and 50106 ofthe Health and Safety Code) on the subject properly. The 320 multi-family affordable housing units shall be deed-restricted for a period of at least 55 years from the date ofrecording unless a different term is approved by the City Council.

School District Map Copy
Upon recordation of the Final Map, the owner/applicant shall provide the Folsom- Cordova Unified School District with a copy of the recorded Final Map.

Digital Map Copy
Upon recordation of the Final Map, the owner/applicant shall provide a digital copy of the recorded Final Map (in AutoCAD format) to the Community Development Department.

Bikeway PIan
Upon recordation of the Final Map, Applicant/Owner shall dedicate easements for Class I and Class II bike trails as shown on Figure 7.32 - Bikeway Plan of the FPASP, as applicable to the proiect area. Easement areas shall be shown on the Final Map.

Mitigation
Measure
2 1
22 23
24 25
Resolution No. 11308

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

CONDTTIONS OF APPROVAL FOR THE HTLLSBOROUGH AREA 40 LLTSM PROJECT (PN 22-001s9)

VICINITY OF PRAIRIE CITY ROAD AND MANGINI PARKWAY

LARGE-LOT TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
Responsible
Department
cD (E), EWR, PW,
Parks, FD
cDD (E)

ADVISORIES
When
Required
M
M
B uc k b o ne Infr astr uct ur e
The owner/applicant and all subsequent applicants, heirs, and successors with intention of further subdividing the large lots established herein are required to provide to the Community Development Department for review and approval by the City Engineer a Backbone Infrastructure Plan. Acknowledging Condition of Approval #3 above conveying no development rights with this approval, this condition applies to all future subsequent subdivision and parcel maps where development is intended, including but not limited to, condominium and townhome projects. Additional studies and supporting documentation may also be required as part of that future effort.

For such subsequent mapping, and as provided for in the ARDA, Amendment No. 1, and the FPASP, the owner/applicant shall provide fully executed grant deeds, legal descriptions, and plats for all necessary rights of way, public utility easements, public water main easements, public sewer easements, oak woodland preserves, park dedications, future circulation elements, hydraulic infrastructure dedication, irrevocable offers of dedication and temporary construction easement. All required easements as listed necessary for the Backbone Infrastructure shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and recorded with the Sacramento County Recorder pursuant to the timing requirements set for in Section 3.8 of the ARDA and any amendments thereto.

Prairie City Section
The cross section as presented in the proposed large lot tentative map may be revised to based on a mutually agreed upon cross section between the City and the County with coordination of the applicant that will adequately serve the City and County functional needs on Prairie City Road. City and County staff are currently in discussions and will work with the applicant to address any revisions to the cross section. The cross section will not exceed the cross section as presented on the proposed large lot tentative map.

Mitigation
Measure
26 27
Resolution No. 11308

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR THE HILLSBOROUGH AREA 40 LLTSM PROJECT (pN 22-001s9)

VICINITY OF PRAIRIE CITY ROAD AND MANGINI PARI(WAY

LARGE-LOT TENTATTVE SUBDIVISION MAP
Responsible
Denartment

CDD(E), EWR, PW,
FD
When
Required
MPhasing PIun
This condition applies to all future small lot subdivision maps. For subsequent small lot tentative subdivision maps, the owner/applicant shall prepare a complete and comprehensive phasing plan and shall submit the phasing plan to the City for each proposed phase of development. The phasing plan shall include all required infrastructure for each proposed phase of development. The infrastructure shall include all required on-site and off-site improvements, but not limited to, water system improvements (distribution and transmission mains, booster pump stations, water reservoirs, tanks, pumps, PRV stations, etc.), sanitary sewer improvements (sewer mains, lift stations, forced mains, etc.) roadway and transportation improvements, storm drainage improvements (detentior/water quality basins, outfalls, etc.) and all other necessary improvements required for each phase of development. The phasing plan shall include itemized cost estimates for all required improvements and the phasing plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City.

The City Engineer may condition the phasing to ensure that each phase functions independently and is consistent with the minimum utility and access standards of the City. All maps filed in phases will be required to have two points of access for emergency vehicle access and/or general traffic purposes and all off-site utilities deemed necessary as determined by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for all future phases that include half sections of local residential streets shall include a minimum of 15 feet of pavement over the centerline, to allow two-way traffic and shall be subject to approval of the Community Development Department and Fire Department. The City will not dictate the order of the phasing except that the first phase shall construct necessary supporting backbone infrastructure to that phase.

Mitigation
Measure

28. Resolution No. 11308

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

ATTACHMENT 2
Planning Commission Staff Report, dated October 30,2024

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

AGENDA ITEM NO.2
Type: Public Hearing
Date: October 30,2024
l-()r,sollf
Project:

File #:

Requests:

Location/APN:

Staff Contact:

Planning Commission Staff Report
50 Natoma Street, Council Chambers
Folsom, CA 95630
Hillsborough Area 40 Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map sUBPM 22-00159
Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map
Vicinity of Prairie City Road and Mangini Parkway/APN: 072- 0060-090
Jessica Brandt, Principal Planner, 916-461 -6207
[email protected]
Property Owner/Applicant
Name: Aerojet Rocketdyne lnc.

Address: P.O Box 1209
Folsom, CA 95763
Recommendation: Conduct a public hearing and upon conclusion recommend approval of a Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map for the Hillsborough Area 40 Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map project to the City Council, based on the findings (Findings A-N) and subject to the conditions of approval (Conditions 1-25) attached to this report.

Project Summary: The proposed project includes a request for approval of a Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map to subdivide a 148.2-acre parcel located in the vicinity of Prairie City Road and Mangini Parkway into seven (7) individual parcels for future sale and development. No development rights are sought with the proposed Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map.

Table of Gontents:

Attachment 1 - Description/Analysis
Attachment 2 - Background
Attachment 3 - Conditions of Approval
Attachment 4 - Vicinity Map
Attachment 5 - Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map, dated August 9,2024 Attachment 6 - Land Use Overlay, dated August 20,2024
Attachment 7 - Project Narrative, dated August 9,2024
Attachment 8 - Addendum to the Final EIR for the FPASP, dated September 17,2O24 City of Folsom Page 1

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

F()LS()M
oraTrtcrrv: lY raruRl
AGENDA ITEM NO. 2
Type: Public Hearing
Date: October 30,2024
Submitted,

PAM JOHNS
Commun ity Development Director
City of Folsom Page2

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Planning Commission
Hillsborough Area 40 Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map (PN 22-00159) October 30,2024
ATTACHMENT 1

DESCRIPTION/ANALYSIS

APPLICANT'S PROPOSAL
The applicant, Aerojet Rocketdyne lnc., is requesting approval of a Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map to subdivide a 148.2-acre parcel located in the vicinity of Prairie City Road and Mangini Parkway, within the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan (FPASP), into seven (7) individual parcels for future sale and development. No development rights are sought with the proposed Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map.

The project site, which is currently undeveloped, features gently rolling hills covered with non-native grassland and a variety of trees. Figures 1 and 2 on the following pages show the location of the project site within the Folsom Plan Area and a land use overlay of the project site based on the approved FPASP land use designations.

FIGURE 1: PROJECT LOCATION EXHIBIT
l=9thnd"r
i l*r:l*.{ !{lc:!rI*!
"s.

Ein
l. :1 @,
&&l-'I,
. ll,46t DU
. 27,610 Populatlon
i. 6,7 du/ac Averags Denslty
| 2.8m GSF Commerclal

PROJECT SITE
Fblsom Plan Area Specific Plan
20U I 2024 Entitlements
City of Folsom
202t

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Planning Commission
Hillsborough Area 40 Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map (PN 22-00159) October 30,2024
FIGURE 2: FPASP Land Use Designations Overlay
The proposed Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map will result in the creation of a total of 7 lots, most of which will continue to include multiple Specific Plan Land Use Designations (see Attachment 6- Land Use Overlay). The proposed project also includes the dedication of Rights-of-Ways and Public Utility Easements to allow for development of future roadways and associated infrastructure improvements. lt is important to note that the proposed large lots approximate the project area's Specific Plan Land Use Designations and FPASP Parcels, but do not adhere perfectly to them. This is due to several factors including anticipated roadway realignments and mapping efficiency. No land use changes or modifications are proposed with this project. The applicant states that future parcel configuration will be consistent with the approved Land Use Plan, or General Plan iI
3 Propo6sd
Lot I
Proposed
Lot 2
Llmils ol Tenlatlve Map
(Parcol 1 asshownon
223 PM 5lP.opoBed
Lol 3
PropoB€d
l.ot7
Bummarv
RC m.F gF}O
0t o7 t9,Ldt r1.g
0t i 0.6
@l
111-
153l0
..19"
q9
!0,3
2to
r0t r.6
.-,-!e!t-
. !q!l
Lol a
E8 0.4
0,9
i_

1.0 .1Ls
o?
ra6
Llt t
lct 3
Loi t tt
!1!
ll
h n.a s3 3!.O t-c LA rt3.ttolrl Ir.8
City of Folsom Page 4

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Planning Commission
Hillsborough Area 40 Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map (PN 22-00159) October 30,2024
and/or Specific Plan Amendments (or Minor Administrative Modifications, if applicable) will be sought to bring the land uses and parcel lines into conformance. A land use summary is shown below, and the proposed Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map is shown on the following page.

TABLE 1: LAND USE SUMMARY

13.3SP-SF/SP-OS1
SP-SF/SP-OS 10.32
SP-SF/SP-P/SP-OS 25.33

62.14 SP.P/SP-OS

13.95 SP-MHD

9.36 SP-MHD

14.0SP-SFHD/SP-OS7
148.2Total
] i')i: li rlcl :J I rij,i I i'll[{il 1i]}:ry.) ,1\r:) i(rJr:j llr rtililr.rj)\ City of Folsom Page 5

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Planning Commission
Hillsborough Area 40 Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map (PN 22-00159) October 30,2024
::"..
;
!i
2:':
ii
I
jl
t,l -':;: ,ii?,*_:4+
.,r.l,u*l J.l::l-L.dt'l'.' I
.-+J,.-. -- - I.'#lI .'-*l
.6}.-"4#L-
IARGE tOT

TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP

HILLSBOROUGH - A
!4Y!..4r!Y'v.?41P
s$(ffiqe
REA 40
rENr^rwwrclurm
6;'-.HSH-,
r1t
b***wd
FIGURE 3: LARGE-LOT TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
City of Folsom Page 6

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Planning Commission
Hillsborough Area 40 Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map (PN 22-00159) October 30,2024
General Plan and Specific Plan Gonsistency
The 148.2-acre project site has multiple General Plan land use designations including:
. SF (Single-Family)
. SFHD (Single-Family High Density)
. MHD (MultLFami$ High Density)
. oS (Open Space)
. P (Park)
ln addition, the project site has multiple Specific Plan designations including. o SP-SF-PD (Specific Plan-Single-Family-Planned Development Permit District) . SP-SFHD-PD (Specific Plan-Single-Family High Density-Planned Development Permit District)
. SP-MHD-PD (Specific Plan-Multi-Family High Density-Planned Development District)
. SP-OSl (Specific Plan-Preserve Open Space)
. SP-OS2 (Specific Plan-Passive Open Space)
o SP-P (Parks)
The existing General Plan and the Specific Plan land use designations are consistent with each other and are not proposed to change as part of this project.

As no development is proposed with this specific application, the only relevant development standard applicable to the subdivision map is minimum lot area. The minimum required lot area for these properties ranges from 4,000 square feet for the SP- SFHD-PD designated parcel up to 0.S-acres for the SP-MHD-PD designated parcel, with no minimum lot size requirements being applicable to the SP-OS1, SP-OS2, and SP-P designated parcels. Staff has determined that the proposed project meets the minimum lot area requirement as all seven of the newly created parcels exceed the minimum lot size requirement based on their individual Specific Plan designations. ln addition, staff has determined that the proposed project will not conflict with any known applicable plans or policies by agencies with jurisdiction over the project or the project site.

Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map
The proposed project is a request for approval of a Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map to subdivid e a 148.2-acre parcel (Parcel 1) located in the vicinity of Prairie City Road and Mangini Parkway into seven (7) individual parcels for future sale and development. The proposed Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map is included with this report as Attachment

5. ln addition to the creation of seven large lots for future single-family residential, multi- City of Folsom Page 7

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Planning Commission
Hillsborough Area 40 Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map (PN 22-00159) October 30,2024
family residential, open space, park development and preservation, the proposed project includes the establishment of lrrevocable Offers of Dedication (lODs) for future development of roadways as shown and designated in the FPASP. Specific roadways that will be developed in the future in and around the project site include the extension of Mangini Parkway to Prairie City Road, the widening of Prairie City Road, and the construction of Street "D" along the northern boundary. Public utility easements (PUEs) adjacent to the lODs will also be established with the proposed project.

As discussed in the project narrative (Attachment 7), the primary purpose of the proposed project is to accommodate the sale, lease, and financing of the newly created large lots in accordance with the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act. No development rights are being requested, and to that effect, there is a note on the Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map stating so.

Future small-lot tentative maps will further subdivide the large parcels of land into smaller lots consistent with the FPASP land use and allocation map. These future tentative maps will seek development rights after the transfer of land to the developer is completed. The future parcel configurations will be consistent with the approved FPASP land use plan and will establish discreet parcels of land based on the FPASP land use boundaries (meaning, the future maps will create lots with singular land use designations, versus this LLTSM where there are large lots with multiple land use designations). Large lots with multiple land use designations exist throughout the FPASP; it is with individual small-lot tentative maps that the smaller lots are created to be consistent with the FPASP land use boundaries. Processing and approval of a Small-Lot Tentative and Final Map and Planned Development Permit applications or other appropriate entitlements will be required prior to grading, construction, or any development of the parcels created by this Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map. Condition No. 3 is included to reflect this requirement.

Staff has determined that the proposed Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map complies with all City requirements (Folsom Municipal Code IFMCI. Chapter 16.16), as well as with the requirements of the State Subdivision Map Act.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
On June 28,2A11, the Folsom City Council approved (Resolution No. 8863) the FPASP for development of up lo 10,210 residential housing units in a range of housing types, styles, and densities along with commercial, industrial/office park, and mixed-use land uses, open space, public schools, parks and infrastructure projected to occur on the approximate 3,585-acre site. The FPASP EIR/EIS (June 2011) included an allocation of 1,624 residential units, 17 acres of community commercial, 42 acres of industrial/office park, 58 acres of public/quasi-public, 58 acres of parks, and 238 acres of open space to the Hillsborough area.

City of Folsom Page 8

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Planning Commission
Hillsborough Area 40 Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map (PN 22-00159) October 30,2024
On May 24, 2016, the Folsom City Council approved the Hillsborough Specific Plan Amendment (SPA) (Resolution No. 9763), an Amendment to the Folsom General Plan (Resolution No. 9762), and an Addendum to the Final EIR/EIS (Resolution No. 9761) for the Hillsborough Project. The approved SPA included 394 additional housing units with 65 additional acres of residential uses, approximately 49 fewer acres of public/quasi- public uses, approximately 16 acres less open space, approximately 5 additional acres of park space, and approximately 4 fewer acres of community commercial land uses. The Hillsborough SPA Addendum reviewed the potential impacts associated with the Hillsborough development and considered whether the existing mitigation that was adopted with the FPSAP EIR/EIS was sufficient to reduce environmental impacts (City of Folsom 2016). The Addendum concluded that the Hillsborough SPA would not result in any new or substantially more severe environmental impacts as compared to the FPASP EIR/EIS.

The FPASP was updated in 2018 to include all the various approved plan amendments and mapping modifications made since the first approval in 2011. As amended, the FPASP provided for additional residential development, up to a total of 11,461 residential units.

The FPASP was amended again on August 27,2024, as part of the City of Folsom General Plan Amendments for lncreased Residential Capacity Project (Resolution No. 11252), with certification of a Subsequent ElR. The amendments to the FPASP allow for the potential of an additional 1,882 residential units with an increase of 314 units on the project site. That project also changed approximately 13 acres in the area from a Communig Commercial (CC) land use and specific plan designation to Multifamily High Density (MHD) to help the City meet its Housing Element goals.

An Addendum was prepared by Ascent Environmental on September 17,2024, that found the potential impacts of the proposed LLTSM project to be adequately addressed by the FPASP EIR/EIS, Hillsborough SPA Addendum, and City of Folsom General Plan Amendments for lncreased Residential Capacity Project Subsequent ElR.

As explained in Attachment 8, an addendum, rather than a subsequent ElR, is sufficient to document the potential environmental impacts of the project. Per CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, an addendum is appropriate when a previously certified EIR has been prepared and some changes or revisions to the project are proposed, or the circumstances surrounding the project have changed, but none of the changes or revisions would result in significant new or substantially more severe environmental impacts. The Addendum prepared for the Hillsborough Area 40 Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map project is included with this report as Attachment 8.

City of Folsom Page 9

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

A.

B.

Planning Commission
Hillsborough Area 40 Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map (PN 22-00159) October 30,2024
Based on the analysis in the Addendum, the City has determined that the previously prepared environmental documents fully address all the impacts of the proposed project.

All mitigation measures applicable to the project still apply (see the proposed conditions of approval), and no new mitigation measures are needed. Therefore, staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the Addendum to the City Council.

RECOMMENDATION/PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
Move to recommend that the City Council adopt an Addendum to the Final Environmental lmpact ReporUEnvironmental lmpact Statement for the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan and approve a Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map for the Hillsborough Area 40 Large- Lot Tentative Subdivision Map project, based on the findings (Findings A-N) and subject to the conditions of approval (Conditions 1-25) attached to this report.

GENERAL FINDINGS

NOTICE OF HEARING HAS BEEN GIVEN AT THE TIME AND IN THE MANNER REQUIRED BY STATE LAWAND CITY CODE.

THE PROJECT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN AND THE FOLSOM PLAN AREA SPECIFIC PLAN.

CEQA FINDINGS

THE CITY, AS LEAD AGENCY, PREVIOUSLY CERTIFIED AN

E NVI RON MENTAL I M PACT REPORT/E NVI RON M E NTAL I M PACT STATEMENT FOR THE FOLSOM PLAN AREA SPECIFIC PLAN.

THE CITY HAS DETERMINED THAT THE HILLSBOROUGH AREA 40 LARGE-

LOT TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP PROJECT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE FOLSOM PLAN AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AS AMENDED.

THE CITY HAS DETERMINED THAT NONE OF THE CIRCUMSTANCES
DESCRIBED IN PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE SECTION 21166 OR CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15162 GENERALLY REQUIRING THE PREPARATION OF A SUBSEQUENT EIR EXIST IN THIS CASE.

THE CITY HAS PREPARED AN ADDENDUM TO THE FINAL

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE FOLSOM PLAN AREA

SPECIFIC PLAN AND HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROJECT CREATES

NO NEW IMPACTS AND DOES NOT REQUIRE ANY MITIGATION MEASURES IN ADDITION TO THOSE IN THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT.

G. THE CITY HAS DETERMINED THAT THE IMPACTS OF THE HILLSBOROUGH City of Folsom Page 10
c
D
E
F

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Planning Commission
Hillsborough Area 40 Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map (PN 22-00159) October 30,2024
H
AREA 40 LARGE-LOT TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP PROJECT ARE

ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED BY THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT

REPORT FOR THE FOLSOM PLAN AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AS WELL AS THE

SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE GENERAL
PLAN AND FOLSOM PLAN AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS.

THE PLANNING COMMISSION HAS CONSIDERED THE ADDENDUM WITH THE FINAL EIR BEFORE MAKING A DECISION ON THE PROJECT.

TENTA SUBDIVISION MAP FINDINGS

THE PROPOSED LARGE-LOT TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP IS

CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY'S SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE AND THE

SUBDIVISION MAP ACT IN THAT THE PROJECT IS SUBJECT TO

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THAT WILL ENSURE THAT THE PROJECT IS DEVELOPED IN COMPLIANCE WITH CITY STANDARDS.

THE PROPOSED SUBDIVISION, TOGETHER WITH THE PROVISIONS FOR

ITS DESIGN AND IMPROVEMENT, IS CONSISTENT WITH THE GENERAL

PLAN, THE FOLSOM PLAN AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AS AMENDED, AND ALL APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE FOLSOM MUNICIPAL CODE.

AS CONDITIONED, THE DESIGN OF THE LARGE-LOT TENTATIVE

SUBDIVISION MAP AND THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ARE NOT

LIKELY TO CAUSE SUBSTANTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE OR

SUBSTANTIALLY AND AVOIDABLY INJURY FISH OR WILDLIFE OR THEIR HABITAT.

AS CONDITIONED, THE DESIGN OF THE LARGE-LOT TENTATIVE

SUBDIVISION MAP AND THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ARE NOT

LIKELY TO CAUSE SERIOUS PUBLIC HEALTH OR SAFETY PROBLEMS

THE DESIGN OF THE LARGE-LOT TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP AND THE

TYPE OF IMPROVEMENTS WILL NOT CONFLICT WITH EASEMENTS FOR

ACCESS THROUGH OR USE OF PROPERTY WITHIN THE PROPOSED
SUBDIVISION.

SUBJECT TO SECTION 66474.4 OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT, THE LAND

IS NOT SUBJECT TO A CONTRACT ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO THE cALtFORNtA LAND CONSERVATION ACT OF 1965 (COMMENCING WITH sEcTloN 51200 oF THE GOVERNMENT CODE).

J
K
L
M
N
City of Folsom Page 1 1

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Planning Commission
Hillsborough Area 40 Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map (PN 22-00159) October 30,2024
ATTACHMENT 2

BACKGROUND

BACKGROUND
On May 24,2016, the City Council approved an Addendum to the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan EIR/EIS, a General Plan Amendment, a Specific Plan Amendment, and a Development Agreement Amendment for development of the Hillsborough GPA/SPA project on a714-acre site located along the western edge of the Folsom Plan Area. The Hillsborough GPA/SPA project included development of 2,018 residential units, 737,000 square feet of office/industrialiretail uses, parks, and schools within the project site.

The approved entitlements referenced above resulted in changes to the layout of General Plan and Specific Plan land use designations throughout the project site. ln general, these changes included roadway realignments, relocation and resizing commercial land uses within the project area, relocation of multi-family land uses, and the placement of single-family high-density residential uses in an area previously designated as public/quasi-public (POP) for a private school site.

A portion of the Hillsborough project site, including the property that is the subject of the proposed LLTSM, is located within the Aerojet Superfund site (known as Area 40). After City Council approval of the Hillsborough GPA/SPA project in 2016, Area 40 has undergone investigation and remediation under the direction of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWOCB). Eighteen (18) specific sites within Area 40 were identified as designated remediation areas and a Remedial Action Plan was created.

The Final Remedial Action Plan for Area 40 (2018) includes a remedy consisting of installation of a permeable reactive barrier to treat contaminated groundwater, multiple excavations to remove contaminated soil, and continued monitoring of groundwater, soil vapor, and ambient air conditions to evaluate remedy effectiveness and progress toward cleanup goals. When the remedial actions identified in the Final Remedial Action Plan have been completed, the risks posed by the contamination hazard will be adequately reduced to protect public health. A detailed discussion of the remediation for each of the 18 sites within Area 40 is contained in the Addendum to the Final EIR for the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan EIR (Attachment 8).

On August 27 ,2024, the City Council approved Resolutlon 11252 to change the land use designation of specified properties within the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan and to increase the allowed residential capacity of the Plan area. These amendments were part of the 'City of Folsom 2035 GeneralPlan Amendmentsfor lncreased ResidentialCapacity Project,'which was a City effort to address State Housing Element mandates and address the need for housing for all income levels in Folsom.

City of Folsom Page 12

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Planning Commission
Hillsborough Area 40 Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map (PN 22-00159) October 30,2024
Two sub-areas of Hillsborough Area 40 were affected by Resolution 11252; proposed Lots 5 and 6, as follows:
. Amend the land use and specific plan designations of Lot 5 (13.22 acres) from Community Commercial (CC) to Multi-Family High Density (MHD) to allow for up to 320 multi-family housing units. (Note: referred to as'Site 15' in the Resolution.) . Decrease the number of dwelling units allocated to Lot 6 from 2461o 240. (Note:
referred to as'Site 16'in the Resolution.)
City of Folsom Page 13

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Planning Commission
Hillsborough Area 40 Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map (PN 22-00159) October 30,2024
Attachment 3
Gonditions of Approval
City of Folsom Page 14

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Planning Commission
Hillsborough Area 40 Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Project (PN 22-00159) October 30,2024
GONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR THE HILLSBOROUGH AREA 40 LLTSM PROJECT (PN 22.00159)

VICINITY OF PRAIRIE CITY ROAD AND MANGINI PARKI/VAY
LARGE.LOT TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
Responsible
Department

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
cD (EXP)
cD (EXP)
When
Required
M OG
M
Final Map
The applicant shall submit a Large-Lot Final Map to the Community Development Department that shall substantially conform to the exhibits referenced below:

1. Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map, dated August 9,2024

2. Land Use Overlay, dated October 8,2024
The Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map is approved for the creation of seven (7) individual lots (Hillsborough Area 40 Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Project). lmplementation of the project shall be consistent with the above- referenced items and these conditions of approval.
9ADay Protest Period
The conditions of project approval set forth herein include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions.

Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d), these conditions constitute written notice of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations and other exactions.

The applicant is hereby notified that the 90-day protest period, commencing from the date of approval of the project, has begun. lf the applicant fails to file a protest regarding any of the fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements or other exaction contained in this notice, complying with all the requirements of Government Code Section 66020, the applicant will be legally barred from later challenoinq such exactions.

Mitigation
Measure
1 2

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Planning Commission
Hillsborough Area 40 Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Project (PN 22-00159) October 30,2024
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR THE HILLSBOROUGH AREA 40 LLTSM PROJECT (PN 22-00159)

VICINITY OF PRAIRIE CITY ROAD AND MANGINI PARI(WAY

LARG E-LOT TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
Responsible
Department
cD (EXP)
cD (PXEXB)

PW, PR, FD,
PD
When
Required
M
OG
No Development Nghts
The approval of this Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map does not convey any right to develop. Processing and approval of a Small-Lot Final Map and/or Design Review/Planned Development Permit applications shall be required prior to grading, construction, or any development of the parcels created by this Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map.
lndemnity for City
The owner/applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul any approval by the City or any of its agencies, departments, commissions, agents, officers, employees, or legislative body concerning the project, which claim, action or proceeding is brought within the time period provided therefore in Government Code Section 66499.37 or other applicable statutes of limitation.

The City will promptly notify the owner/applicant of any such claim, action or proceeding, and will cooperate fully in the defense. The City may, within its unlimited discretion, participate in the defense of any such claim, action or proceeding if both of the following occur:
. The City bears its own attorney's fees and costs; and . The City defends the claim, action or proceeding in good faith The owner/applicant shall not be required to pay or perform any settlement of such claim, action or proceeding unless the settlement is approved by the owner/applicant. The owner/applicant's obligations under this condition shall apply regardless of whether a Final Map is ultimately recorded with respect to this oroiect.

Mitigation
Measure

3. 4

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Planning Commission
Hillsborough Area 40 Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Project (PN 22-00159) October 30,2024
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR THE HILLSBOROUGH AREA 40 LLTSM PROJECT (PN 22-00159)

VICINITY OF PRAIRIE CITY ROAD AND MANGINI PARKWAY
LARGE.LOT TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
Responsible
Department
cD (EXP)
cD (PXE)
cD (EXP)
cD (E)
cD (E)
cD(E)
When
Required
M
M
M
M
M
M
Streef Names
The Applicant shall use street names as shown in the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan, and in the case of unnamed streets, select street names from the City's approved list or subsequently approved by the Planning Commission for the final parcel map
ARDA and Amendments
The owner/Applicant shall comply with all provisions of Amendment No. 1 to the First Amended and Restated Tier 1 Development Agreement and any approved amendments thereafter by and between the City and the owner/applicant of the proiect.

Public Right of Way Dedication
As provided for in the Amended and Restated Development Agreement (ARDA) and Amendment No. 1 thereto, and any approved amendments thereafter, at recordation of Final Map the owner/applicant shall offer to dedicate all public rights-of-way such that public access is provided to each and every lot as shown on the Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map
Publ ic Util ity Easements
The Owner/Applicant shall dedicate public utility easements for underground facilities on properties adjacent to public and private streets. A minimum of twelve and one-half-foot (12.5') wide Public Utility easements for underground facilities (i.e., SMUD PG&E, cable television, telephone) shall be dedicated adjacent to all public and private street rights-of-way. The owner/applicant shall dedicate additionalwidth to accommodate extraordinary facilities as determined by the City. The width of the public utility easements adjacent to public and private right of way may be reduced with prior approval from public utility companies.

FMC Compliance
The Final Large-Lot Map shall comply with the Folsom Municipal Code and the Subdivision Map Act.

Single Phase
The Final Larqe-Lot Map shall be recorded in one phase
Mitigation
Measure
5 6.
7 8.

I
1 0

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Planning Commission
Hillsborough Area 40 Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Project (PN 22-00159) October 30,2024
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR THE HILLSBOROUGH AREA 40 LLTSM PROJECT (PN 22-00159)

VICINITY OF PRAIRIE CITY ROAD AND MANGINI PARKI/VAY
LARGE.LOT TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
Responsible
Deoartment
11 12
Validity
The project approval granted under this staff report (Large Lot Tentative Subdivision Map) shall remain in effect for a period of twenty-four (24) months (November 20,2026) pursuantto Section 16.16.110A of the Folsom Municipal Code and the Subdivision Map Act. lf a Final Map is not recorded within the identified time frame and/or the applicant has not demonstrated substantial progress towards the development of the project, this approval shall be considered null and void. The owner/applicant may file an application with the Community Development Department for an extension not less than 60 days prior to the expiration date of the approval, along with appropriate fees and necessary submittal materials pursuant to Section 1 6.16.120 of the Folsom Municipal Code. lf after approval of this project, a lawsuit is filed which seeks to invalidate any approval or entitlement authorized by the project approvals, or to enjoin the project contemplated herein, or to challenge the issuance by any governmental agency of any environmental document or exemption determination, the two-year period referenced in FMC 16.16.110A for finaling the map shall be tolled during the time that any litigation is pending, including any appeals.
ln the event of a conflict between this Condition and language of Amendment No. 1 to the First Amended and Restated Tier '1 Development Agreement the ARDA la u shall control

DEVELOPMENT COSTS AND FEE MENTS
Iaxes and Fees
The owner/applicant shall pay all applicable taxes, fees and charges for the project at the rate and amount required by the Public Facilities Financing Plan and the Amended and Restated Develo ent nt.

M cD(E)
cD (PXE)M
cD (E)
When
Required
MAssessmenfs
lf applicable, the owner/applicant shall pay off any existing assessments against the propertv, or file necessary seqregation request and pay applicable fees.

Mitigation
Measure

13.

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Planning Commission
Hillsborough Area 40 Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Project (PN 22-00159) October 30,2024
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR THE HILLSBOROUGH AREA 40 LLTSM PROJECT (PN 22.00159)

VICINITY OF PRAIRIE CITY ROAD AND MANGINI PARKVVAY
LARG E.LOT TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
Responsible
Department
cD (PXE)
cD (P) PW, PK
When
Required
M
M
Consultant Serwices
lf the City utilizes the services of consultants to prepare special studies or provide specialized design review or inspection services for the project, the applicant shall reimburse the City for actual costs it incurs in utilizing these services, including administrative costs for City personnel. A deposit for these services shallbe provided priorto initiating reviewof the building plans, imorovement olans. or beqinninq inspection, whichever is applicable.

FPASP Development Impact Fee
The owner/applicant shall be subject to all Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan Area development impact fees in place at the time of approval or subsequently adopted consistent with the Public Facilities Financing Plan (PFFP), Development Agreement and amendments thereto, unless exempt by previous agreement. The owner/applicant shall be subject to all applicable Folsom Plan Area plan-wide development impact fees in effect at such time that a building permit is issued. These fees may include, but are not limited to, the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan Fee, Specific Plan lnfrastructure Fee (SPIF), Solid Waste Fee, Corporation Yard Fee, Transportation Management Fee, Transit Fee, Highway 50 lnterchange Fee, General Park Equipment Fee, Housing Trust Fee, etc.

Any protest to such for all fees, dedications, reservations or other exactions imposed on this project will begin on the date of final approval (November 20, 2024)0, or otherwise shall be governed by the terms of Amendment No. 1 to the ARDA. The fees shall be calculated at the fee rate set forth in the PFFP and the ARDA.

Mitigation
Measure
14 51

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Planning Commission
Hillsborough Area 40 Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Project (PN 22-00159) October 30,2024
coNDtTtoNS oF AppRovAL FOR THE HTLLSBOROUGH AREA 40 LLTSM PROJECT (PN 22-00159) VICINITY OF PRAIRIE CITY ROAD AND MANGINI PARIflT'AY
LARGE.LOT TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
Responsible
Deoartment
cD (PXE)
cD (PXE)

MAP REQUIREMENTS
When
Required
M
M
Outside Legal Counsel
The City, at its sole discretion, may utilize the services of outside legal counsel to assist in the implementation of this project, including, but not limited to, drafting, reviewing and/or revising agreements and/or other documentation for the project. lf the City utilizes the services of such outside legal counsel, the applicant shall reimburse the City for all outside legal fees and costs incurred by the City for such services. The applicant may be required, at the sole discretion of the City Attorney, to submit a deposit to the City for these services prior to initiation of the services. The applicant shall be responsible for reimbursement to the Citv for the services regardless of whether a deposit is required.

Mitigation Measures
The Hillsborough Area 40 Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map project shall be subject to all mitigation measures identified in the FPASP (May 2011) MMRP, as amended by the Revised Proposed Water Supply Facility Alternative (November 2012), Folsom South of U.S. Highway 50 Backbone lnfrastructure Mitigated Negative Declaration (December 2014), the Westland Eagle Specific Plan Amendment (September 2015), Hillsborough GPA/SPA Addendum (May 2016), City of Folsom General Plan Amendments for lncreased Residential Capacity Subsequent ElR, and the Hillsborough Area 40 Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Addendum.

Mitigation
Measure
16 17

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Planning Commission
Hillsborough Area 40 Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Project (PN 22-00159) October 30,2024
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR THE HILLSBOROUGH AREA 40 LLTSM PROJECT (PN 22.00159)

VICINITY OF PRAIRIE CITY ROAD AND MANGINI PARKVVAY
LARG E.LOT TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
Responsible
Department
cD (E)
cD (E)
cD (E)
When
Required
M
M
M
Affordable Housi n g Deed Restricti on
A note shall be placed on the Final Map as follows:

Lof 5 as shown on the Large Lot Tentative Subdivision Map (13.9-acre parcel) rs subl'ecf to deed restriction for affordable housing purposes. Said deed restriction shall require a minimum area of 10 acres of said lot to be deed- restricted for the development of not /ess fhan 320 multi-family housing units affordable to low-, very-low, and/or extremely-low income households (as fhose terms are defined rn Secfions 50079.5, 50093, 50150, and 50106 of the Health and Safety Code) on the subject property. The 320 multi-family affordable housing units shall be deed resticted for a period of at least 55 years from the date of recording.

Remediation
A note shall be added to the final map that states:

Portions of this large lot map are located within Aeroiet's Area 40 site, which is currently undergoing remediation. All entitlement requesfs and development applications located within the Area 40 site require concuffence from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to show that the area has been fully remediated in accordance with the Final Remedial Action Plan and is now safe and eligible for development.

An approximate outline of Area 40 within project boundaries is required to be shown on the LLFM.

FPASP Compliance
A note shall be added to the final map that states
This map is subiecf to requirements outlined in the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan as amended August 27, 2024, and the Hillsborough Specific Plan Amendment per Ordinance Nos 1254-1258
Mitigation
Measure
1 I
1I

20.

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Planning Commission
Hillsborough Area 40 Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Project (PN 22-00159) October 30,2024
coNDtTtoNS oF AppRovAL FoR THE HTLLSBOROUGH AREA 40 LLTSM PROJECT (PN 22-00159)

VICINITY OF PRAIRIE CITY ROAD AND MANGINI PARI(WAY
LARG E.LOT TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
Responsible
Department
cD (P)(E)
cD (E)
cD (E)
cD (E)
When
Required
M
M
OG
OG
FPASP Parcel 38
Delineate FPASP Parcel 38 as shown in Figure 4.3- Plan Area Parcels of the FPASP, as amended August 2024, on the Final Map. Any future Small Lot Tentative Map of the area that includes that parcel shall create a new parcel consistent with the boundaries of FPASP Parcel 38 to ensure adequate measures are taken to separate the area from the rest of Community Park West.

Affordabl e Ho usi ng Deed Restri cti on
Simultaneous with approval of a Development Plan for Lot 5 as shown on the Large Lot Tentative Subdivision Map (13.9-acre parcel) the owner/applicant shall create and record a deed restriction on a portion of said Lot 5 to restrict use of such property to affordable housing purposes only. Said deed restriction shall be in a form approved by the City Attorney. Said deed restriction shall require a minimum area of 10 acres of said lot to be deed-restricted for the development of not less than 320 multi-family housing units affordable to low-, very-low, and/or extremely-low income households (as those terms are defined in Sections 50079.5, 50093, 50150, and 50106 of the Health and Safety Code) on the subject property. The 320 multi-family affordable housing units shall be deed-restricted for a period of at least 55 years from the date of recording unless a different term is approved bv the Citv Council.

School District Map Copy
Upon recordation of the Final Map, the owner/applicant shall provide the Folsom-Cordova Unified School District with a copy of the recorded Final Map Digital Map Copy
Upon recordation of the Final Map, the owner/applicant shall provide a digital copy of the recorded Final Map (in AutoCAD format) to the Community Development Department.

Mitigation
Measure
21 22.
23 24.

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Planning Commission
Hillsborough Area 40 Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Project (PN 22-00159) October 30,2024
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR THE HILLSBOROUGH AREA 40 LLTSM PROJECT (PN 22.00159)

VICINITY OF PRAIRIE CITY ROAD AND MANGINI PARKI/VAY

LARGE-LOT TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
Responsible
Department
cD (PXE)
When
Required
M
Bikeway PIan
Upon recordation of the Final Map, ApplicanVOwner shall dedicate easements for Class I and Class ll bike trails as shown on Figure 7.32- Bikeway Plan of the FPASP, as applicable to the project area. Easement areas shall be shown on the Final Map
Mitigation
Measure
25 WHEN REQUIRED
Prior to approval of lmprovement Plans
Prior to approval of Final Map
Prior to issuance of first Buildinq Permit
Prior to approval of Occupancy Permit
Prior to issuance of Gradinq Permit
Durinq construction
On-qoinq requirement
I
M
B
o
G
DC
OG

RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT
Community Development Department
Planning Division
Engineering Division
Building Division
Fire Division
Public Works Department
Park and Recreation Department
Police Department
CD
(P)
(E)
(B)
(F)
PW
PR
PD

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Planning Commission
Hillsborough Area 40 Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Project (PN 22-00159) October 30,2024
Attachment 4
Vicinity Map

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Planning Commission
Hillsborough Area 40 Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Project (PN 22-00159) October 30,2024
Attachment 5
Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map
Dated August 9,2024

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Planning Commission
Hillsborough Area 40 Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Project (PN 22-00159) October 30,2024
Attachment 6
Land Use Overlay
Dated October 8, 2024

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Planning Commission
Hillsborough Area 40 Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Project (PN 22-00159) October 30,2024
Attachment 7
Project Narrative
Dated August 9,2024

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Planning Commission
Hillsborough Area 40 Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Project (PN 22-00159) October 30,2024
Attachment 8
Addendum to Final EIR for the FPASP
Dated September 17, 2024

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

ATTACHMENT 3
Minutes from October 30,2024, Planning Commission Meeting

12/10/2024 Item No.19.
r.'()r.s().\l

PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES

SPECIAL MEETING
October 30,2024

CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
6:30 P.M.
50 Natoma Street
Folsom, CA 95630
GALL TO ORDER PLANNING GOMMISSION:

The regular planning Cornmission Meeting was called to order at 6:31 p.m. with Chair Eileen Reynolds presiding.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The Pledge of Allegiance was recited.

ROLL CALL:

Commissioners Present: Mathew Herrera, Commissioner
DanielWest, Vice Chair
Bill Miklos, Commissioner
Ralph Pef,a, Commissioner
Bill Romanelli, Commissioner
James Ortega, Commissioner
Eileen Reynolds, Chair
Commissioners Absent: None
GITIZENCOMMUNICATION: None
MINUTES:

The minutes of the October 16,2024. Regular Meeting were approved as submitted

NEW BUSINESS
A public Hearing to consider a request from the Spanos Corporation for two one-year extensions to a Planned Development pirmit for the Alder Creek Apartments Project at the southeast corner of the intersection of Alder Creek parkway and Westwood Drive within the Folsom Plan Area. The extensions would establish a new expiration Oate of February 29,2026. The General Plan Land Use designation for the projecl site is MHD (Multi-Family High Density), wnite ihe Specific Plan land use designation is SP- MHD-PD (Specific Plan, Multi-Family High Density, planneO Oevelopment District). The City, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed project is consistent with the Folsom plan Area Specific Plan (FPASP) Final Environmental lmpact ReporUEnvironmental lmpact Planning Commission Minutes
October 30, 2024

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Statement (FElRyElS) and Alder Creek Apartments FEIF/EIS Addendum and therefore no additional environmental review is required. (FroJect Planner: Jessica Brandt / Applicanfi The Spanos Gorporation) COMMISSIONER MIKLOS MOVED TO APPROVE A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERM]T EXTENSION FOR A pERtoD oF oNE-YEAR (UNT|L FEBRUARY 23,20251AND ANOTHER PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT EXTENSTON FOR A pERiOD OF ONE-YEAR (UNTIL FEBRUARY 23,2026), FOR DEVELOPMENT OF THE ALDER CREEK APARTMENTS PROJECT (PDEV2$026), BASED ON THE FINDINGS (FINDINGS A-P) AND SUBJECT TO THE CONDTTTONS OF APPROVAL (CONDITIONS 145) ATTACHED TO THIS REPORT.

COMMISSIONER ROMANELLI SECONDED THE MOTION.

AYES: HERRERA, VVEST, MIKLOS, PENA, ROMANELLI, ORTEGA, REYNOLDS NOES: NONE
RECUSED: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
MOT]ON PASSED
A Public Hearing to consider a request from AerojeURocketdyne lnc. to apprwe a Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Map (LLTSM) foi tne area known as Hillsborough Area 40, in the vicinity of Prairie Ci$ Road and Mangini Parkway, in the Folsom Plan Area. The LLTSM would subdivide one parcel of approximately 148.2 acres into seven individual parcels for future sale and development. No development rights are sought with the proposed LLTSM. The subject parcel contains multiple General Plan and Specilic Plan land use designations, none o[_w!!ch would change with ihis approval. An Environmental Checklist and Addendum to the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan EIR/EIS has been prepared for this project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). (ProJect Planner:

Jessica Brandt / Appllcant: AeroJeURocketdyne, lnc.)

COMMISSIONER VVEST MOVED TO RECOMMEND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ADDENDUM TO

THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE FOLSOM PI.AN AREA SPECIFIC PI.AN AND APPROVE A I.ARGE.LOT TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR THE HILLSBOROUGH AREA 40 LARGE.LOT TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP PROJECT, BASED ON THE F|NDINGS (F|ND|NGS A-N) AND SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (CONDITIONS 1-25) ATTACHED TO THIS REPORT, WTH MODIFICATIONS / CHANGES TO FOLLOWNG CONDITIONS:

AMENDMENT OF CONDITION NO. 1a
FINAL MAP:

THE APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A LARGE-LOT FINAL MAP TO THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT THAT SHALL SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORM TO THE EXHIBITS REFERENCED BELOW:

1. ISRGE-LOTTENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP, DATED AUGUST 9,2024

2. I.AND USE OVERLAY, DATED OCTOBER 8,2024
THE T.ARGE-LOT TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP !S APPROVED FOR THE CREATION OF SEVEN (7) tNDtvtDUAL LOTS (HTLLSBOROUGH AREA 40 LARGE-LOT TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP PRoJECT). |MPLEMENTAT|ON OF THE PROJECT SHALL BE CONSISTENT WTH THE ABOVE-

REFERENCED ITEMS, THE FOLSOM PLAN AREA SPECIFIC PLAN (FPASP) AS AMENDED, THE HILLSBOROUGH SPECIFIC PI-AN AMENDMENT PER ORDINANCE NO. 1254.1258, AND THESE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL.

THE FINAL MAP SHALL DELINEATE THE AREA SHO\AN AS LOT 38 IN THE FPASP AND REFERENCE THE REMEDIAL ACTION PI-AN (RAP) FOR SAID SITE.

TIMING: M, OG
RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT: CD (E)(P)
Planning Commission Minutes
October 30, 2024

12/10/2024 Item No.19.
a AMENDMENT OF CONDITION NO. 3
NO DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS:

THE APPROVAL OF THIS LARGE.LOT TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP DOES NOT CONVEY ANY RIGHT TO DEVELOP. PROCESSING AND APPROVAL OF A SMALL.LOT FTNAL MAP AND/OR DESIGN REVIEWPI.ANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATIONS SHALL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO ONNOIruO, CONSTRUCTION, OR ANY DEVELOPMENT OF THE PARCELS CREATED BY THIS LARGE.LOT TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP.

AS A CONDITION OF A SUBSEQUENT SMALL.LOT TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP, THE CITY SHALL IDENTIFY ]MPROVEMENTS NECESSARY TO DEVELOP THE SUBJECT PARCELS. THESE IMPROVEMENTS MAY INCLUDE ON AND OFF.SITE ROADWAYS, WATER, SEWER, STORM DRAINAGE, LANDSCAPING, SOU N DWALLS. AN D OTH ER SIMI I.AR IMPROVEMENTS.

TIMING:M
RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT: CD (E)(P)
AMENDMENT OF CONDITION NO. 11
VALIDITY:

THE PROJECT APPROVAL GRANTED UNDER THIS STAFF REPORT (LARGE LOT TENTATIVE suBDtvtstoN MAp) SHALL REMATN tN EFFECT FOR A PERIOD OF TVVENW-FOUR (24) MONTHS (ocToBER 30, 2026) PURSUANT TO SECTTON 16.16.'110A OF THE FOLSOM MUNICIPAL CODE AND tHe SUeovISION Ii/IAP ACT. IF A FINAL MAP IS NOT RECORDED WTHIN THE IDENTIFIED TIME FRAME AND/OR THE APPL]CANT HAS NOT DEMONSTRATED SUBSTANT]AL PROGRESS

TOWARDS THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROJECT, THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE CONSIDERED NULL AND VOID. THE OVVT{ER/APPLICANT MAY FILE AN APPLICATION WTH THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR AN EXTENSION NOT LESS THAN 60 DAYS PRIOR TO THE

EXPIRATION DATE OF THE APPROVAL, ALONG WITH APPROPRIATE FEES AND NECESSARY SUBMITTAL MATERIALS PURSUANT TO SECTION 16.16.120 OF THE FOLSOM MUNICIPAL CODE.

IF AFTER APPROVAL OF THIS PROJECT, A LAWSUIT IS FILED vVl{ICH SEEKS TO INVALIDATE ANY

APPROVAL OR ENTITLEMENT AUTHORIZED BY THE PROJECT APPROVALS, OR TO ENJOIN THE

PROJECT CONTEMPLATED HEREIN, OR TO CHALLENGE THE ISSUANCE BY ANY

GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY OF ANY ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT OR EXEMPTION DETERMINATION, THE TWO-YEAR PERIOD REFERENCED IN FMC 16.16.110A FOR FINALING THE

MAP SHALL BE TOLLED DURING THE TIME THAT ANY LITIGATION IS PENDING, INCLUDING ANY APPEALS.

IN THE EVENT OF A CONFLICT BETT'VEEN THIS CONDITION AND I.ANGUAGE OF AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED TIER 1 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (ARDA), THE ARDA LANGUAGE SHALL CONTROL.

TIMING:M
RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT: CD (E)
AMENDMENT OF CONDITION NO. 14
CONSULTANT SERVICES:

IF THE CITY UTILIZES THE SERVICES OF CONSULTANTS TO PREPARE SPECIAL STUDIES OR

PROVIDE SPECIALIZED DESIGN REVIEW OR INSPECTION SERVICES FOR THE PROJECT, THE

APPLICANT SHALL REIMBURSE THE CITY FOR ACTUAL COSTS IT INCURS IN UTILIZING THESE SERVICES, INCLUDING ADMINISTRATIVE GOSTS FOR CITY PERSONNEL. A DEPOSIT FOR THESE

SERVICES SHALL BE PROVIDED PRIOR TO INITIATING REVIEW OF MAPPING DOCUMENTS, THE

BUILDING PLANS, IMPROVEMENT PI-ANS, OR BEGINNING INSPECTION, WHICHEVER IS APPLICABLE.

TIMING: M
RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT: CD (PXE)
a
Planning Commission Minutes
October30,2024

12/10/2024 Item No.19.
a
a
AMENDMENT OF CONDITION NO. 19
REMEDIATION:

A NOTE SHALL BE ADDED TO THE FINAL MAP THAT STATES:

PORTIONS OF THIS LARGE LOT MAP ARE LOCATED WTHIN AEROJET'S AREA 40 SITE, WHICH IS CURRENTLY UNDERGOING REMEDIATION. ALL ENTITLEMENT REOUESTS AND DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS LOCATED WTHIN THE AREA 40 SITE REQUIRE CONCURRENCE FROM THE

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (EPA) TO SHOW THAT THE AREA HAS BEEN FULLY

REMEDIATED IN ACCORDANCEWTH THE FINAL REMEDIALACTION PLAN AND IS NOWSAFEAND ELIGIBLE FOR DEVELOPMENT.

AN APPROXIMATE OUTLINE OF AREA 40 WTHIN PROJECT BOUNDARIES IS REQUIRED TO BE SHOV1N ON THE LLFM, SEE CONDITION NO. 1.

TIMING: M
RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT: CD (E)
AMENpMENT OF CONDITION NO.26
BACKBONE INFRASTRUCTURE:

THE OV\NER/APPLICANT AND ALL SUBSEQUENT APPLICANTS, HEIRS, AND SUCCESSORS WTH

INTENTION OF FURTHER SUBDIVIDING THE LARGE LOTS ESTABLISHED HEREIN ARE REQUIRED

TO PROVIDE TO THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR REVIEWAND APPROVAL BY THE CITY ENGINEER A BACKBONE INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN. THIS CONDITION APPLIES TO ALL FUTURE SUBSEQUENT SUBDIV]SION AND PARCEL MAPS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, CONDOMINIUM AND TOVVNHOME PROJECTS. ADDITIONAL STUDIES AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION MAY ALSO BE REQUIRED AS PART OF THIS CONDITION.

AS PROVIDED FOR IN THE ARDA, AMENDMENT NO. 1, AND THE FPASP, THE OVI/NER/APPLICANT

SHALL PROVIDE FULLY EXECUTED GRANT DEEDS, LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS, AND PISTS FOR ALL

NECESSARY RIGHTS OF WAY, PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS, PUBLIC WATER MAIN EASEMENTS, PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENTS, OAK WOODLAND PRESERVES, PARK DEDICATIONS, FUruRE

CIRCULATION ELEMENTS, HYDRAULIC INFMSTRUCTURE DEDICATION, IRREVOCABLE OFFERS OF DEDICATION AND TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT. ALL REQUIRED EASEMENTS AS

LISTED NECESSARY FOR THE BACKBONE INFRASTRUCTURE SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER AND RECORDED WTH THE SACF{AMENTO COUNTY RECORDER PURSUANT TO THE TIMING REQUIREMENTS SET FOR IN SECTION 3.8 OF THE ARDA AND ANY AMENDMENTS THERETO.

TIMING:M
RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT:CDD(E)' EWR, PW PARKS' FD
AMENDMENT OF CONDITION NO. 27
PHASING PI-AN:

FOR SUBSEQUENT SMALL LOT TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAPS, THE O\fVI\EFYAPPLICANT SHALL

PREPARE A COMPLETE AND COMPREHENSIVE PHASING PIAN AND SHALL SUBMIT THE PHASING PLAN TO THE CITY FOR EACH PROPOSED PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT. THE PHASING

PLAN SHALL INCLUDE ALL REQUIRED INFRASTRUCTURE FOR EACH PROPOSED PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT. THE INFRASTRUCTURE SHALL INCLUDE ALL REQUIRED ON-SITE AND OFF.SITE tMpRovEMENTS, BUT NOT L|M|TED TO, WATER SYSTEM ]MPROVEMENTS (DISTRIBUTION AND

TMNSMISSION MAINS, BOOSTER PUMP STATIONS, WATER RESERVOIRS, TANKS, PUMPS, PRV STAT1ONS, ETC.), SANITARY SEl/r,ER IMPROVEMENTS (SEVVER MAINS, LIFT STATIONS, FORCED MA|NS, ETC.) 'ROADWAY AND TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS, STORM DRAINAGE IMPRoVEMENIS (DE-TENTIONMATER QUALITY BASINS, OUTFALLS, ETC.) AID ALL OTHER NECESSARY IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED FOR EACH PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT. THE PHASING

PLAN SHALL INCLUDE ITEMIZED COST ESTIMATES FOR ALL REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS AND THE PHASING PLAN SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY.

Planning Commission Minutes
Oclober 30,2024

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

THE CITY ENGINEER MAY CONDITION THE PHASING TO ENSURETHAT EACH PHASE FUNCTIONS

INDEPENDENTLY AND IS CONSISTENT WTH THE MINIMUM UTILITY AND ACCESS STANDARDS OF THE CITY. ALL MAPS FILED IN PHASES WLL BE REQUIRED TO HAVE TWO POINTS OF ACCESS FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS AND/OR GENERAL TRAFFIC PURPOSES AND ALL OFF.SITE UTILITIES DEEMED NECESSARY AS DETERMINED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. IMPROVEMENT

PLANS FOR ALL FUTURE PHASES THAT INCLUDE HALF SECTIONS OF LOCAL RESIDENTIAL STREETS SHALL INCLUDE A MINIMUM OF 15 FEET OF PAVEMENT OVER THE CENTERLINE, TO ALLOW TWO.WAY TRAFFIC AND SHALL BE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF THE COMMUNIry DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AND FIRE DEPARTMENT. THE CITY WLL NOT DICTATE THE

ORDER OF THE PHASING EXCEPT THAT THE FIRST PHASE SHALL CONSTRUCT NECESSARY SUPPORTING BACKBONE INFRASTRUCTURE TO THAT PHASE.

TIMING:M
RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT:CDD(E), EWR, PW FD

COMMISSIONER ORTEGA SECONDED THE MOTION,
AYES: HERRERA, WEST, MIKLOS, PENA, ORTEGA, REYNOLDS
NOES: NONE
RECUSED: ROMANELLI
ABSENT: NONE

MOTION PASSED
A public Hearing to consider and make recommendations to the Cily Council on the proposed Central Business District Vision plin, establishing a vision and guiding principles for the future of the district with transformative ideas and implementation strategies/actions to improve the distict over time. No specific project or development proposils are contemptated at this time. The Central Business District Vision Plan will serve to guide future imptementation steps ind proposals. ln addition, future development proposals will be subject to compliance with th; City's GeneralFhn, Zoning Code, and subject to full environmental revier,rr in accordance with CEQA. This project is statutorily exempt from environmental review undEr Section 15262 (Feasibility and Planning Studies) of the CEQA Guidelines. (Project Manager: Kathy Pease)

COMMISSIONER REYNOLDS MOVED TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF THE

CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT VISION PLAN BASED ON THE FINDINGS INCLUDED IN THIS REPORT (FTNDTNGS A-D).

COMMISSIONER WEST SECONDED THE MOTION.

AYES: HERREM,IJVEST, MIKLOS, PENA, ROMANELLI, ORTEGA, REYNOLDS NOES: NONE
RECUSED: NONE
ABSENT: NONE

MOTION PASSED

PLANNTNG COMMISSION / PLANNING MANAGBREPORT
Planning Manager, Desmond Parrington, shared the following with the Commission:
. The next meeting scheduled will be held on November 20,2024. c Staff has handled 23 projects: 21 design reviews for custom homes, accessory structures, additions, commercial canopies ahd-patios, I uniform sign program, and 1 minor administrative amendment for the Folsom Plan Area SPecific Plan.

Planning Commission Minutes
October30,2024

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Our current Chief Building Official Scott Zangrando has retired, and we have promoted our Depu$ Building Official, Alllison Konwinskito fill that position, starting on Friday, November 1,2024.

ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Folsom Planning Commission, Chair Eileen Reynolds adjourned the meeting at 8:05 p.m.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
e HANNuM, ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT
AP
Eileen Reynolds, CHAIR
Planning Gommission Minutes
october 30, 2024

a

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

ATTACHMENT 4
Vicinity Map

12/10/2024 Item No.19.
vtctN ITY MAP (SU BP22-oo1 s9)

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

ATTACHMENT 5
Large-Lot Tentative Subdivision Mup, dated August 9, 2024

12/10/2024 Item No.19.
':i
.,.''.

VICINIY MAP
+
STREfl"D'

TENTATIVF MAP INFORMATION

TENTATIVE MAP NOTES
{'-:

BENCHMARK
' rn''oq.I,tr frifir.)q,

LARGE LOT
+

TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
HILLSBOROUGH - AREA 40
t...3g llilrY&$Dr

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

ATTACHMENT 6
Land Use Overlay, dated August 20, 2024

12/10/2024 Item No.19.
"'-"---J
T
E-
I
\
\
\
\
@
150 300 600
NOTE:

I. THIS EXHIBIT DISPLAYS THE OVERLAY OF THE PROPOSED

LARGE LOT TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP (LLTSM) ONTO THE CURRENT

LAND USE DESIGNATIONS PER THE FOLSOM PLAN AREA SPECIFIC PLAN UPDATE, DATED AUGUST 27,2024.

Feet
HITTSBOROUGH AREA 40

TENTATIVE MAP / LAND USE OVERTAY
ocToBER 8,2024
Proposed
Lot 1
Proposed
Lot 2
Limits of Tentative Map
(Parcel 1 as shown on
223 PM 5)Proposed
Lot 3
Proposed
Lot 7
ROW TolalSF SFHD os os-Lc
13 30.8 0.7Lot I 'l'1.8

0.7 240

0.6 10.3

25.3 9-0

1.0 Lot 2
Lot 3 0.3
62150.3 1.5Lot 4

13.1 10.3

0.8Lot 5
l0

9.3 14.0
Lot 6
Ldi 7 7.O

9.3 5.6 0.4
39-q t-s 4.6 fia.2Total 21.4 7.0 22.4 50.6

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

ATTACHMENT 7
Project Narrative, dated August 9, 2024

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

HB.A4O HILLSBOROUGH AREA 40 LLTSM Project Norrotive
August 9,2024

PROJECT

NARRAI'YE
We ore pleosed to
resubmil the Plonning
Entillement
Applicolion for the

HITLSBOROUGH AREA
40 (HB-A40) LARGE
tOT TENIATIVE
SUBDIVISION MAP.
lfems submtffed
include:
l. Revised Project
Norrotive

2. Revised Lorge Lot
Tentoiive
Subdivision Mop

3. Revised Lond Use
Overloy Exhibit

4. Responses to
Comments Molrix

5. Updoted Public
Nolicing
Moteriols
Pleose contoct me if
you hove questions
ond/or need
onything further.

Donna Posqvontonio
AS|.r'., LEED AP
MocKoy & Somps Civil
Engineers, lnc.
1025 Creekside Ridge Drive.

Suite 150 | Roseville. CA
95678-3575 | Cell: 916-919-
7??91P:916.773.1189 |
E: [email protected]
HB AREA 40 LLTSM

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

HB-A40 | HILLSBOROUGH AREA 40 LLTSM Project Norrotive
\ romt Laxe

PROJECI BACKGROUND
The FOLSOM PIAN AREA SPECIFIC PLAN (FPASP) wos opproved by ihe City of Folsom on June 28, 20'l 1 {Resolution No.8853). The Plon encomposses 3,5,l3.4 undeveloped ocres locoted south of Highwoy 50, north of White Rock Rood, eost of Proirie City Rood ond bordering the Socromento County/El Dorodo County Line, os shown below.

FPASP Regionol Confexf Mop
HB AREA 40 LLTSM
E

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

HB-A40 | HILLSBOROUGH AREA 40 LLTSM Project Norrotive

PROJECI
BACKGROUND:

The Folsom Plqn
Areo Specific Plon
2011-2024
Enlillemenls
exhibit is shown
here.

This exhibit
illustrqtes the
current
entitlemenl history
ond lond plonning
slotus for the
FPASP Plon Areo.

The HB'A40
TLVISM oreq is
shown here. The
Project Site is
locoted on Proirie
City Rood oi
Mongini Porkwoy.

Logend
." [ln. Inu ll
cc ---l
wo:or f-l
t-.-l*
[ -l+nrr
flnu
lllln+ro
l:: iEo
ilrl
'-- I
mf
. 11,46'l DU
c 27,510Population
. 6.7 du/ac Average Density
o 2.8m GSF Commercial
Revised: ?024
US HGHWAY 50
I
l
I
I
I
iL
o
N
-#,

PROJECT SITE
Folsom PIan Area Specific Plan
2011 I 2A24 Entitlements
rusn Ridl.!rtr'!N sP Af cnft .!t
',..,
'l
----!Ez.:q1-ffe'26ftn
- ili--
19 ___l!s_
: . --.. ..-.9.1 a:r4l'
.,-.-4-.... : l&4.ry-......
----ilr--iel]lL
!4 - -E-12":_og- _
al] run.6l0s
HB AREA 40 LLTSM
E

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

HB-A40 | HILLSBOROUGH AREA 40 LLTSM Project Norrotive
PROJECI BACKGROUND:

N
#
w
,l
l$
I

PROJECT SIIE
Dwelling Unit Allocation
Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan
-
CiFTfFolso[ Califoraia
nAG{AY&S0mPS R?tisrdrtr\!:o2J
#
Legend
FPASP Parcel Number
(See Table 4.3 for more detail.)
Ihe FPASP
Allocqlion Mop is
shown here.

The proposed
Projecl is shown
ond so
designoted on
the FPASP
Allocotion Mop
ond Toble.

PROJECIAREA

FPASP PARCEI,S-
SF: 9
SFHD: 12[PTN)
MHD: l6
CC: l5
PARK: 10,38
OPEN SPACE]
r3[PTN), 35(PTN),
36A, 368, 5l B(PTN
5t c.

The property
owner is Aerojet
Rocketdyne ond
the Assessor's
Porcel Number is
072-0600{90
HB AREA 40 LLTSM
E

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

HB.A4O HILLSBOROUGH AREA 40 LLTSM Project Norrotive
t*
I
L-
Iq to!.

PARCEL 3
ffiN4N
4 rsl@
rI
APG'€ffiTasEs&
\ EG:E'C\\. ffffir4

I,-EGEND
oE
Ngmffi6m
Fffir4sffdffiR6$fC
f@MM6Sm
rlrm*ffffi*sT@6asER€l
FlNrl$OOMmmSrc46
SlFSMPu$ffiT)
il'MWW'[email protected]
ffiMffiffi6S
@si affi
re
WFEMS
'lw(ffi6E&ffi@@GGs#SOW
(lJMwa FffizoD.rcffiru rym4R942
to!.i
i
7i
I
I
I
i
I
1 I
I
I
I
!
I
I
i
I
.l
I
?
I
t
5 9
V!\?(-f..
t
I
(oc
ot
tl
i
J
LINE TABT€ CURV€ TASLE
L1 W'f,1ft rg,2a
u M 912{ eB St'*6 SS €
t4 &frd 3a.ra q
I
--J
6 rJ910G 575 Ct tr? $?l? OA
16 G.€aG UIS
L? SlSry 6.46 lM1* lfrrB 'lF1*
{321(r0 ll?@t 73,6
tll 65& "28!
J- .'t/
RAqIS OF REARINGS
fii?T atal'. .t.i:
2nlAil:ll5
i.li. ii I rig
PiRCn
rMDSMWhS,*1S&B$) \
PARCEL 5
E€sGffiSNffiWNE$ffiEl@ffiWMdIEWITGffi l9mtRs.l swAwrcf twln' NNSA
L BslNffSSst&.RNz n€stsJffllEffiBffi{Mroalda.sffiN6re,3. WslF@toffi&F&6lffi$l&FffiffiffiS,3d@MOR@.. @frs&dowEMG(ffidlrsEFMSffiIAAI3r&OiGll- t P.@ffiffi&wloffilff,[email protected][trN(MffiWffi &'1OE 1E EltJ'lNgffiffi P€Ntr
&ffiffimw. rcEitrrmoRgg NsN
& ffi5ffircclMs,ffi,ffiMs,ffi.sss.ff,@,Es&ffia@11!oR.1s.7. [email protected] PffiWwq&sffiTDltff&ffiNffiqrNDhGR 1ffimr'ffiONrlt@ o.R.@sft1s7r50i.@e ffiffffirowERsmYmt@GSffiN
Nffiffi WmW#FeSS!1rlzqR.1&.ar@o,R@mo@oi@.
ro. ffislrcroEm.'(w,lw€iGl0N*f NFAUdffi(Mild *FMmo
6trffidwoRw aPGr€.ffiflTE6lf,m4
&s.Ur,ffiFEF6OR S
PARCEL 3

PROJECT S
1i\?5 0:
r sAK0:niiL.os
lnt?a{?., o.R a"i4
i
*rmu'.r- i
I
o
.H=
"bdqa+DzY.. Ea
n -a,
i: q=
=o
.: ot
;.
t!.
_1',
*Gt& 'aF
i!l
..i
1:
,5
L
:i
I
I
I
j
I
l
i
;
i
!
I
I
1 1
G
z\
io
E
i
-i-
1PARCEL
+
!-
i
I
t
-t
*J
I
:
i
i
c
'ar
2 -*l 6d
I {k_ twffi* :
l*t** ----'lErl .***, I
d3r&o,Es* tf:T RN
! @4salruk rl'il r
i-*r*=rrCl,Sieaff;.b*-la"
L** **J
DFTAIL ?B'fts
GFM
r-**.j

DETAIL '

EEEEEEIEES-
{r) [email protected]
(s) t14t3t oRs(3) d1@OR M U
o &1moa,&
F, eRS,E
,w-
i
-$e*Tdf&rc*F
omwl@
PN14-329 ffi

PARCEL MAP
sftu* M1ffiS@@E(ffidEffi6.Ar3Nag Sl31S.AT Pre€ @. @ru*@ +ffi@ NA m dscsarM Pffi 66@ Nmlemat
l@@ffitrrqE4M€ lOtUEMM@ffOdsYz. d5nffi alw,AtP& w.ru w6 sMMm8NAffidssua,]W,l@,rc tw mscnN l!.lcN!,lowPtsil.M!g$Mll&OEfuN CITY OF FOLSOM .SACRAM€MIO COUNTY 'CALIFORNIA
u
-.1
I}ETAIL 2C'DSIGI{AIED REMAINDER
i.rnlJi:7 nac{[:tY\: lNa.
t9 ks ?t
t-
c,$
:./,iiFPirEt-
ti77
ililfia*src & t@
MAY 2015
SHEET 2 OF 5

PROJECIS'IE

ENT'II,EMENI
HISTORY:

APPROVED
H'TI.SBOROUGH

PARCEL MAP
Shown here is the
H'[I.SBOROUGH
PARCEL MAP.

On Moy 28,2015,
the

HILLSBOROUGH
(PN-r 4-329)

PARCEL MAP
recorded ot ihe
Socromento
County Assessor's
Office (223 PM 5).

Porcel I (hereon
outlined in red)
wos retoined by
Aerojet
Rockeldyne, ond
Porcels 2-5 were
tronsfened to
vorious entities.

Porcel I is the
subjecf of fhis
applicotion.

HB AREA 40 LLTSM

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

HB.A4O HILLSBOROUGH AREA 40 LLTSM Project Norrotive

PROJECIS'IE

FNI'ITEMENT
HISIORY:

APPROVED
HII.I.SBOROUGH
SPA snd GPA
$ffi
wTB
sg{Fh

APPROVED
20't6

ADOPTED
201't
gM
,se-s
ftr-
{.E
s6
+72
00 0!
i2
00 {6?
SJ
{5
-1.5

6.5 D]
16?
el
9A
1fl
4t9
10!

8.2 sl
t@
4t5
163
t@c
90 E6
93 173
4r$
s.7
99 9.6
!85
dt
ls@
*qbfuy(l{tu)
gsb rrdyabhhir {a7 d-l
uffadyb{@F-t?d-)
Wrdyue&q{€-&t
[ffd&wlru@l
t*{hr*r*!ffi}
bkr{Mhs96zGl
OFn SF?iFBFOpsSFht
u@
lE6
ffiffiffi
IIG'FEtffi
EEri:6F
s*
TH
N
.#_.,
-t-q

SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT
HIrrseoRoucH
,osrffibhffi
..

I[sNqYgsom **Hlfiii
Shown here is lhe
H'LI.SBOROUGH
SPA exhibif.

On Moy 24,2016,
the Folsom Cily
Council odopted
on oddendum to
the Finol EIR/EIS for
the Folsom Plon
Areo Specific Plon
in conneciion wilh
the HILLSBOROUGH
project (Resolution
97 61).Ihe Council
olso opproved o
Generol Plon
Amendment
(Resolution 9262)
qnd on
omendmenl to the
Folsom Plon Areo
Specific Plon for
The HILLSBOROUGH
project (Resolution
9763).The
opproved SPA increosed the residentiol dwelling unit count by 394 unils ond decreosed the omounl of commerciql oreo by opproximolely 4.2oc ond 46,827 gross squqre feel of commerciol building oreo.

HB AREA 40 LLTSM
r

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

HB-A40 | HILLSBOROUGH AREA 40 LLTSM Project Norrotive
253

4.1 t39
tao
to3
sP@
sP{,!rD
2 3
4 6
7 .niir' tARGt tor

TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
* HILLSBOROUGH - AREA 40
s.r[*ila
PROPOSED ENT'fl.EMENIS SOUGHI W.IIH TH'S APPLICATION:

I.ARGE LOT TEM ATIYE SUBD'YISIO N M AP (LLTSM) :
lhe Large tof lenlofive Subdivisrbn Mop is shown here.

The Lorge Loi Tentotive Mop seeks to further subdivide the oreo shown ond so designoled os Porcel I of Porcel Mop 223 PM 5 into vorious lorge lols. The street sections shown on the LLTSM ore the some os those opproved in the FPASP forthese roodwoys. Adjoining public utiliiy eosemenis (PUEs) olong the loDs ore olso shown ond so designoted. The exisling lrrevocoble offers of Dedicqlion (loDs) ore shown on the LLVTSM forspecific roodwoys shown ond designoted in the FPASP. New odditionol proposed streets qre shown os rights-of-woy os requesled by city stoff. The street sections shown on lhe LLVTSM ore consislent wilh those opproved in the FPASP.

Wifh lhis Lorge Lol lenlqfive Subdivision Mop:
r The subdivision of lond (porcel configurotion) is sought for the trqnsfer of londs occordfng to a purchqse ond sole ogreernenf between the property owner ond buyer.
. Lorge lois (i.e., this LLTSM) ore soughl for the purpose of sole, Iesse, and/or finoncing only,in occordonce with lhe Subdivision Mop Act' r No deyelopmenf nghts ore soughf with the LLVTSM ond there is o nole on the foce of the mop stoting so.
r Furthermoppingof ihissiiewill occur. Fvlvrelargelof ondsmolllof fenfoltve rnops wrll further subdivide the lorge porcels of lqnd tnlo srnoller lofs consislenlwilh lhe FPASP lond use ond ollocqfion mop. These future lentotive mops (by olhers) will seek development rights ofter the lronsfer of lond to ihe developer is compleled. The future porcel configurotion will be consislent wilh the opproved FPASP lond use plon ond will estqblish discreel porcels of lond bqsed on the FPASP lond use boundories (meoning, the fulure mops will creote lots with singulor lond use designotions, versus this LLTSM where there ore lorge lots with multiple lond use designotions). Lorge lots wilh muliiple lond use designolions exist throughout the FPASP; it is with individuol lentolive mops (LLTSMs ond SLTSMs lhot seek octuol development rights) thot the smoller lots qre creoled to be consislent wilh the FPASP lond use boundories.

HB AREA 40 LLTSM
z

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

HB-A40 | HTLLSBOROUGH AREA 40 LLTSM Project Norrotive
tI
E
1 I

1. NOTE:

I. TH6 €XHI&T DISPhYS ThE OVERLAY OF THE PROPOS€O
LARGE LOTIRTATIVE SUSDIVISION MAP ONJO HE CURR€NI
LArc USE DEgGNAIDNS PFR ftE FO$OM PIAN AREA SP€CIFIC
PLAN UPDATE, DATED AUGU$ 3I, M23, SOM€ UND USES MAY CHANGE IN IHE FUTURE. FOR EXAMPLE. LO] S 15 IO BE R€DESGNATED AS MHD PER ffE P€NDING FOISOM PLN AREA SPECIFiC PLAN AMENDMENT
iO BE HEARD BY lHE FOLSOMCIY COUNCIL ON AUGUSI27,2024.
o
HILTSBOROUGH AREA 40

TENTANVE MAP / TAND USE OVERTAY
aucust 9,2(n4
Limits of Tentative Map
(Parel '1 as shown on
223 PM 5)
Proposed
sr-sF Lot 2
131& Proposed
F*NoEr) LotS
Propos€d
Lot 6
Prcposed
X"T, Lot 3
."f r
(rcN OUMS) '
itroposed- '' ' ''
Lot 4
Proposed
Lot 1
An LLTSM/FPASP tond Use Overloy Exhibil is shown here.

This overloy exhibit illustrotes how the proposed LLTSM (shown in thick block lines) overloys on the opproved FPASP 2016 (current) lond use plon (shown in colored oreos).

Also shown here, ond so lobeled, ore the ocreoge of the vqrious individuql lqnd uses within the proposed lorge lots thot ore the subject of this LLTSM.

Future lorge ond smoll lot tentotive subdivision mops (seeking development rights) will further subdivide these proposed lorge lots into smoller lots, wiih boundories thot will be consistenl/congruent with the lond uses shown on the FPASP. (See vorious colored oreos indicoting discrete lond uses.) A Generol Plon Amendment ond Specific Plon Amendment for o Minor Administrotive Modificotion "MAM") will be soughi to bring the lond uses inlo conformonce with the opproved Generol Plon ond Specific Plon designotions in the future of time of request for developmenl rights.

As o reminder, the proposed LLVTSM seeks lo subdivide the subject oreo for purposes of sole, leose & finoncing only. This subdivision of lond will position the offected properties for fuiure specific development opplicotions. No development rights ore sought oi this time.

For more information, pleose see lhe full submillol pockoge ond/or conloct lhe projecf opplicdnl.

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

ATTACHMENT 8
Addendum to the FPASP EIVEIS, dated Septemb et 17 , 2024

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Memo
455 Capitol Mall, Suite 300
Sacramento, CA 95814
916.444.7301
Date:

To:

From
September 17,2024
Jessica Brandt, Principal Planner
Pat Angell and Kari Zajac, Ascent Environmental, lnc.

Subject: Hillsborough Area 40 Large Lot Tentative Subdivision Map, Environmental lnformation Supporting Addendum to the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan EIVEIS At the request of the City of Folsom (City), Ascent has prepared this evaluation of the potential environmental impacts that may be associated with the Hillsborough Area 40 Large Lot Tentative Subdivision Map (hereinafter referred to as the "project"). This evaluation assesses whether the potential impacts are within the scope of analysis of and adequately addressed by the Environmental lmpact Report/Environmental lmpact Statement for the Folsom South of U.S. Highway 50 Specific Plan Project (FPASP EIR/ElS) (State Clearinghouse No. 200809205'1). This analysis determines whether new or different impacts associated with the project would occur because of changes in circumstances (i.e., the length of time since the prior ElRs' analysis), pursuant to Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. Based on the analysis contained in this memorandum, the City has determined that an addendum is the appropriate environmental document for the project consistent with Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines.

PROJECT LOCATION
The 148.2-acre project site is within the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan (FPASP). The FPASP encompasses a total of 3,585 acres and is located within Folsom, south of U.S. Highway 50 and north of White Rock Road, between Prairie City Road and the El Dorado County line (see Figure 1). The project site is located on Prairie City Road at Mangini Parkway and identified as Parcel i of the Hillsborough area in the southwestern portion of the FPASP (see Figure 2).

PROJECT BACKGROUND
On June 28,2011, the Folsom City Council approved (Resolution ItJo. 8863) the FPASP for development of up to 10,210 residential housing units in a range of housing types, styles, and densities along with commercial, industrial/office park, and mixed-use land uses, open space, public schools, parks and infrastructure projected to occur on the approximate 3,585-acre site (City of Folsom 2010; City of Folsom 201'1). The FPASP EIR/EIS (June 2011) included an allocation of 1,624 residential units, 17 acres of community commercial, 42 acres of industrial/office park, 58 acres of public/quasi-public, 58 acres of parks, and 238 acres of open space to the Hillsborough area.

The FPASP was updated in 2018 to include all the various approved plan amendments and mapping modifications made since the first approval in 201'1. As amended, the FPASP provides for additional residential development, up to a total of 11,461 residential units. The FPASP was amended again on August 27 , 2024 as part of the City of Folsom General Plan Amendments for lncreased Residential Capacity Project (Resolution No. 11252). The amended the FPASP allows for the potential of an additional l,BB2 residential units.

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Hillsborough Area 40 Memo
September 17, 2024

%
l-r
T'.777,
i _- _-:
r::-i
liillsbororrqh Specific Plan Area
Project Site (Hillsborough Lot 1)
Folsor.lr South of U.S. 50
Specilic Plarr Area Boutrdary
City of Folsonr
County Boundary
0 1,75C 3,500
F!!FlFeet
202201 28.01 GtS lr0l
,c
[5Rl Intaqet y
Source: Adapted by Ascent in 2022
Figure 1 Project Vicinity
@Page 373
12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Hillsborough Area 40 Memo
September 17, 2024

'\-.
i'
\
d+ \..

Project Location
Fzf
ootluFFfo
Li
)
Loo ls rl \
Rocklin' f'
't
f
t.r)
n,t' k
!
.t
' - - -'.;t#i.T,iei"I,ll* ,
5 Heights
,fr
1i
\
1 I
,)#
Rancho
Cordova
Miles
ESRI Basemap
20220128.01 GrS 002
0 3 6
@
\
I
II
i,)
Fz
oou
o
l' lone
F2
o
O
oF2lu
E
uO
a
I
, l,'
t'r
\
i'
Source: Adapted by Ascent in 2022.

Figure 2 Regional Location
@Page 374
12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Hiilsborough Area 40 Memo
September 17, 2024

The amendments included changes to Lots 15 and 16 within the southern portion of the project site. The land use designation of Lot 15 was changed from Community Commercial (CC) to Multi-Family High Density (MHD) to allow for an additional 320 residential units and Lot 16 was assumed to have a reduction in 6 residential units. Overall, the 2024 amendments to the FPASP allow for an increase in 314 units on the project site.

On May 24,2016, the Folsom City Council approved the Hillsborough Specific Plan Amendment (SPA) (Resolutlon No. 9763), an Amendment to the Folsom General Plan (Resolution No. 9762), and an Addendum to the Final EIR/EIS (Resolution No. 9761) for the Hillsborough Project. The approved SPA included 394 additional housing units with 65 additional acres of residential uses, approximately 49 fewer acres of public/quasi-public uses, approximately i6 acres less open space, approximately 5 additional acres of park space, and approximately 4 fewer acres of community commercial land uses. The Hillsborough SPA Addendum reviewed the potential impacts associated with the Hillsborough development and considered whether the existing mitigation that was adopted with the FPSAP EIR/ElS was sufficient to reduce environmental impacts (City of Folsom 2016). The Addendum concluded that the Hillsborough SPA would not result in any new or substantially more severe environmental impacts as compared to the FPASP EIR/EIS.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project includes a Large Lot Tentative Map and would further subdivide the project site (Lot 1 of the Hillsborough SPA) into a total of seven lots (see Figure 3 and Table 1). The subdivision of land would be used for the transfer of lands between the property owner and buyer. Further mapping of the project site would occur at a later date that would further subdivide the large parcels info smaller lots consistent with the FPSAP land use and allocation map. The future tentative maps would seek development rights after the transfer of land to the developer is complete.

The project would not result in any changes to the buildout projections on the project site as part of the FPSAP or Hillsborough SPA. Additionally, there would be no changes to the street sections approved in the FPASP. Utilities on the site would be provided by City of Folsom, Sacramento Municipal Utility District, and Pacific Gas & Electric, as aniicipated in the FPSAP. The project would be consistent with the FPASP and the Folsom 2035 General Plan.

Table 1 Project Parcel Summary
Parcel Number Acres

13.3 2
3 4
5 6
7 10.3
t( ?

62.1 13.9

9.3 14.0
Notes: SP-SFH D = Single Family High Density, SP-SF = Single Family; SP-M H D = Multi Family High Density; SP-CC = Community Commercial; SP- OS = Open Space
Land Use
SP-SF
SP-SF

SP-OS/SP-P/SP-SF

SP-P/SP-OS
SP.CC
SP-MHD

SP-SFHD/SP-OS
@Page 375
12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Hillsborough Area 40 Memo
September 17, 2024

Proposed
Lot 1
Proposed
Lot 2
Limits of Tentative Map
(Parcel 1 as shown on
223 PM 5)Proposed
Lot 3
Froposed
Lot 5
lsEE NOTE rl
Proposed
Lot 7
cc os os{c Row
Lot I 11.8 0.8 0.7 13.3
Lot 3 0.3 24.O 25.3

62.1Lot 4 15

13.1 7.0

0.8 10
Lot 6
Lot 7

9.3 14.0
9_3 l3-t 50.6 39.9 1.9 il.6 11a.2Tot! I 21.8 7.0
t
E.
o
a
v
t
\
\
\
\
0 250 500
@FEET
20220128.01 GRX 002
{
.i; rtJI;l (ildi
Rrepoed
@4
Source: lmage produced and provided by City of Folsom in 2024, adapted by Ascent Environmental in 2024.

Figure 3 Proposed Lot Split
@Page 376
12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Hillsborough Area 40 Memo
September 17,2024

CONSIDERATION OF CHANGED CI RCUMSTANCES
The approved Hillsborough Specific Plan Amendment, certified on May 24,2016, includes 394 additional housing units with 65 additional acres of residential uses, approximately 49 fewer acres of public/quasi-public uses, approximately 16 acres less open space, approximately 5 additional acres of park space, and approximately 4 fewer acres of community commercial land uses. The City of Folsom General Plan Amendments for lncreased Residential Capacity Projectwas approved on August 27,2024, with certification of a Subsequent ElR, includes an additional314 housing units within the project site. Due to the additional discretionary review required for the changes in land use and population from the previously approved development, the project was evaluated for potential new or different impacts in compliance with Section 15'164 of the CEQA Guidelines.

Based on the analysis presented below, the impacts of the project are determined to be adequately addressed by the FPASP EIR/ElS, Hillsborough SPA Addendum, City of Folsom General Plan Amendments for lncreased Residential Capacity Project Subsequent ElR, and an addendum is sufficient to document environmental impacts of the project.

Per CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, an addendum is appropriate when a previously certified EIR has been prepared and some changes or revisions to the project are proposed, or the circumstances surrounding the project have changed, but none of the changes or revisions would result in significant new or substantially more severe environmental impacts

ENVI RONMENTAL ANALYSI S
Using Appendix G, Environmental Checklist, of the CEQA Guidelines as an analytical tool, the following discussion evaluates the potential environmental impacts of implementation of the project in the context of the FPASP EIR/ElS and the Hillsborough SPA Addendum to determine if those impacts are sufficiently covered, or if additional analysis is necessary. All mitigation measures referenced in this section are included in Attachment A Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.

Aesthetics
lmplementation of the project would involve a subdivision of Lot 1 of the Hillsborough SPA into a total of seven lots.

The project would result in the same buildout and would affect the same area already analyzed and would not alter the development type, building height, or density at the site such that different or more severe aesthetic impacts would result. The following mitigation measures were referenced in the FPASP EIR/EIS analysis and incorporated by reference in the Hillsborough SPA Addendum and City of Folsom General Plan Amendments for lncreased Residential Capacity Subsequent EIR and would continue to remain applicable if the project were approved. > Mitigation Measure 3A.1-4: Screen construction staging areas. > Mitigation Measure 3A.a-5: Establish and Require Conformance to Lighting Standards and Prepare and lmplement a Lighting Plan.

The potential environmental impacts related to aesthetics and associated with implementation of the project are adequately addressed by the FPASP EIR/ElS, Hillsborough SPA Addendum, and City of Folsom General Plan Amendments for lncreased Residential Capacity Project Subsequent ElR, and no additional CEQA documentation is required. Further, pursuant to Section '15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, no new information of substantial importance has been identified that would otherwise necessitate subsequent/supplemental environmental analysis.

Agricultural and Forestry Resources
lmplementation of the project would involve the subdivision of Lot 1 of the Hillsborough SPA into a total of seven lots.

The projectwould affect the same area already analyzed. The site is not designated as or currently in agricultural production, is not designated as Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide lmportance, and is not under Williamson Act contract. The Williamson Act contracts on the parcels on the site expired in 2014 and were not @Page 377
12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Hillsborough Area 40 Memo
September 17,2024

renewed. There were no mitigation measures included in the FPASP EIR/EIS for this topic and no additional mitigation measures are required for the project for this issue.

The potential environmental impacts related to agricultural resources and associated with implementation of the project are adequately addressed by the FPASP EIR/ElS, Hillsborough SPA Addendum, and City of Folsom General Plan Amendments for lncreased Residential Capacity Project Subsequent ElR, and no additional CEQA documentation is required. Further, pursuant to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, no new information of substantial importance has been identified that would othenruise necessitate subsequent/supplemental environmental analysis.

Air Quatity
The project would result in similar construction activity, development area, and same type of construction-generated emissions as previously evaluated in the FPASP EIR/ElS and the Hillsborough SPA Addendum. The project would result in the same buildout as analyzed in the Hillsborough SPA addendum, but would subdivide the site into seven lots. Therefore, the population projected for the project would not exceed that analyzed in the Hillsborough SPA Addendum or and City of Folsom General Plan Amendments for lncreased Residential Capacity Subsequent EIR and transportation emissions would be the same as previously analyzed. Operational emissions were modeled in both the Hillsborough SPA Addendum, the FPASP EIR/ElS, and City of Folsom General Plan Amendments for lncreased Residential Capacity Subsequent ElR. The project would result in the same number of vehicle trips as analyzed in the City of Folsom General Plan Amendments for lncreased Residential Capacity Subsequent EIR because the project would subdivide the site into seven parcels and maintain the existing land uses.

The following mitigation measures were referenced in the FPASP EIR/ElS analysis and incorporated by reference into the Hillsborough SPA Addendum and City of Folsom General Plan Amendments for lncreased Residential Capacity Subsequent EIR and would continue to remain applicable if the project were approved:
> Mitigation Measure 3A.2-1a: lmplement Measures to Control Air Pollutant Emissions Generated by Construction of On-Site Elements.
> Mitigation Measure 3A.2-'lb: Pay Off-site Mitigation Fee to SMAQMD to Off-Set NOX Emissions Generated by Construction of On-Site Elements.
> Mitigaiion Measure 3A.2-1c: Analyze and Disclose Projected PM10 Emission Concentrations at Nearby Sensitive Receptors Resulting from Construction of On-Site Elements' > Mitigation Measure 3A.2-1e: lmplement EDCAQMD-Recommended Measures for Controlling Fugitive PM10 dust During Construction of the Two Roadway Connections in El Dorado County. > Mitigation Measure 3A.2-1f: lmplement SMAQMD's Enhanced Exhaust Control Practices during Construction of all Off-site Elements.
> Mitigation Measure 3A.2-1g'. Pay Off-site Mitigation Fee to SMAQMD to Off-Set NOX Emissions Generated by Construction of Off-site Elements.
> Mitigation Measure 34.2-1h: Analyze and Disclose Projected PM10 Emission Concentrations at Nearby Sensitive Receptors Resulting from Construction of Off-site Elements. > Mitigation Measure 3A.2-2: lmplement All Measures Prescribed by the Air Quality Mitigation Plan to Reduce Operational Air Pollutant Emissions.
> Mitigation Measure 3A.2-4a: Develop and lmplement a Plan to Reduce Exposure of Sensitive Receptors to Construction-Generated Toxic Air Contaminant Emissions
> Mitigation Measure 3A.2-4b'. lmplement Measures to Reduce Exposure of Sensitive Receptors to Operational Emissions of Toxic Air Contaminants.
> Mitigation Measure 34.2-5: lmplement a Site lnvestigation to Determine the Presence of NOA and, if necessary, Prepare and lmplement an Asbestos Dust Control Plan'
@Page 378
12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Hillsborough Area 40 Memo
September 17, 2024

> Mitigation Measures 3A.2-6: lmplement Measures to Control Exposure of Sensitive Receptors to Operational Odorous Emissions.

Potential environmental impacts related to air quality and associated with implementation of the project are adequately addressed by the FPASP EtR/ElS, Hillsborough SPA Addendum, and City of Folsom General Plan Amendments for lncreased Residential Capacity Project Subsequent ElR, and no additional CEQA documentation is required. Further, pursuant to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, no new information of substantial importance has been identified that would otherwise necessitate subsequent/supplemental environmental analysis.

Biologicat Resources
A project-level analysis was conducted for Hillsborough SPA Addendum, which includes the project site, and refinements to the mitigation program were approved to further reduce impacts to special-status plants (ECORP 2015a). lmplementation of the project would involve the subdivision of Lot 'l of the Hillsborough SPA into a total of seven lots. The project would affect the same area already analyzed and would not change the development type or density at the site and different or more severe biological impacts would not result. As discussed in the Hillsborough SPA Addendum, the project could have a significant impact on biological resources; however, the project would continue to be subject to the mitigation measures identified and/or refined in the Hillsborough SPA Addendum and the ECORP analysis, which are presented below. As described in the Hillsborough SPA Addendum, with implementation of these measures, biological impacts would be reduced to a less-than-significant level. The conclusions of the Hillsborough SPA Addendum remain valid, and approval of the project would not result in new or substantially more severe significant impacts to biological resources.

The following project-level mitigation measures were referenced in the Hillsborough SPA Addendum analysis and would continue to remain applicable if the project were approved. These mitigation measures include project-specific refinements to the plan-level mitigation program included in the FPASP EIR/ElS. This information is consistent with the activities recommended in the mitigation adopted for the FPASP. > Mitigation Measure 3A3-2a: Secure Take Authorization for Federally Listed Vernal Pool lnvertebrates and lmplement All Permit Conditions.
> Mitigation Measure 3A.3-2b: Avoid Direct Loss of Swainson's Hawk and Other Raptor Nests. > Mitigation Measure 3A.3-2c: Prepare and lmplement a Swainson's Hawk Mitigation Plan. > Mitigation Measure 3A.3-2d: Obtain lncidental Take Permit for lmpacts on Valley Elderberry Longhorn Beetle and lmplement All Permit Conditions.
> Mitigation Measure 3A.3-2e: Avoid and Minimize lmpacts to Tricolored Blackbird Nesting Colonies. > Mitigation Measure 3A.3-2f: Avoid and Minimize lmpacts to Special-Status Bat Roosts. > Mitigation Measure 3A.3-2g: Obtain an lncidental Take Permit under Section 10(a) of ESA; Develop and lmplement a Habitat Conservation Plan to Compensate for the Loss of Vernal Pool Habitat. > Mitigation Measure 3A.3-2h: Obtain an lncidental Take Permit under Section 10(a) of ESA; Develop and lmplement a Habitat Conservation Plan to Compensate for the Loss of VELB Habitat. ln addition, following project-specific analysis completed for the Hillsborough SPA Addendum, the below refinements to the mitigation program are applicable to the project (ECORP 20'15a). > Mitigation Measure 3.3-'14: Mitigation for erosion impacts. To minimize indirect effects on water quality and wetland hydrology, the project applicant shall include a storm water drainage plan and an erosion and sediment control plan in the improvement plans and shall submit these plans to the City Public Works Department for review and approval. Before approval of these improvement plans, the project applicant shall obtain a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System M54 Municipal Stormwater Permit and Grading Permit, comply with the City's Grading Ordinance and County drainage and storm water quality standards, and commit to implementing @Page 379
12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Hillsborough Area 40 Memo
September 11 ,2024

all measures in their drainage plans and erosion and sediment control plans to avoid and minimize erosion and runoff into Alder Creek and all wetlands and other waters that would remain within the Specific Plan Area (SPA).

The project applicant shall implement storm water quality treatment controls consistent with the Storm Water Quality Design Manual for Sacramento and south Placer Regions (Sacramento stormwater Quality control Partnership 2007). Appropriate runoff controls such as berms, storm gates, off-stream detention basins, overflow collection areas, filtration systems, and sediment traps shall be implemented to control siltation and the potential discharge of pollutants. Development plans shall incorporate low impact development (LlD) features, such as pervious strips, permeable pavements, bioretention ponds, vegetated swales, disconnected rain gutter downspouts, and rain gardens, where appropriate. Use of LID features is recommended by the Environmental protection Agency (EPA) to minimize impacts on water quality, hydrology, and stream geomorphology. ln addition, free-spanning bridge systems shall be used for all roadway crossings over wetlands and other waters that are retained in the on-site open space. These bridge systems would maintain the natural and restored channels of creeks, including the associated wetlands, and would be designed with sufficient span width and depth to provide for wildlife movement along the creek corridors even during high-flow or flood events. ln addition to complying with City ordinances, the project applicant shall obtain a General Construction Storm Water Permit from the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), prepare a Storm Water pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), and implement best management practices (BMPs) to reduce water quality effects during construction.

Each project phase shall result in no net change to peak flows into Alder Creek and associated tributaries, or to tributaries to Buffalo Creek, and Coyote Creek. The project applicant shall establish a baseline of conditions for drainage on-site. The baseline-flow conditions shall be establishedfor 2-,5-,10-, and 2O-year storm events.

These baseline conditions shall be used to develop monitoring standards for the storm water system within the project area. The baseline conditions, monitoring standards, and a monitoring program shall be submitted to USACE and the City for their approval. Water quality and detention basins shall be designed and constructed to ensure that the performance standards are met and shall be designed as off-stream detention basins. Discharge sites into Alder Creek and associated tributaries, as well as tributaries to Coyote Creek, and Buffalo Creek, shall be monitored to ensure that pre-Project conditions are being met. Corrective measures shall be implemented as necessary. The mitigation measures will be satisfied when the monitoring standards are met for five consecutive years without undertaking corrective measures to meet the performance standard.

Mitigation Measure 3.3-'1B: Secure Clean Water Act Section 404 Section 401 Permits. Before the approval of grading and improvement plans and before any groundbreaking activity associated with each distinct project phase, the owner/applicant shall secure all USACE necessary permiis obtained under Sections 401 and 404 of the Clean Water Act or the State's Porter-Cologne Act and implement all permit conditlons for the proposed Central Valley project. All permits, regulatory approvals, and permit conditions for effects on wetland habitats shall be secured and conditions implemented before implementation of any grading activities within 250 feet (or lesser distance as approved by the applicable agencies) of Waters of the U.S, or wetland habitats, including Waters of the State, that potentially support federally-listed species, or within 100 feet (or lesser distance as approved by the applicable agencies) of any other Waters of the U.S. or wetland habitats, including Waters of the State. The owner/applicant shall adhere to all conditions outlined in the permits. The owner/applicant shall commit to replace, restore, or enhance on a "no net loss" basis (in accordance with USACE and the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board) the acreage of all wetlands and other Waters of the U.S. that would be removed, lost, and/or degraded with implementation of the project. Wetland habitat shall be restored, enhanced, and/or replaced at an acreage and location and by methods agreeable to USACE, the Central Valley Regional Water euality Control Board, and the City, as appropriate, depending on agency jurisdiction, and as determined during the Section 40 I and Section 404 permitting processes. The boundaries of the 404 permit, including required buffer shall be shown on the grading plans.

ASCENT

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Hillsborough Area 40 Memo
September 17,2024

All mitigation requirements to satisfy the requirements of the City and the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board, for impacts on the non-jurisdictional wetlands beyond the jurisdiction of USACE, shall be determined and implemented before grading plans are approved' All wetland mitigation compliance reports submitted to USACE shall also be copied concurrently to the City.

Mitigation Measure 3.3-1C: lmplement Seciion 1602 Master Streambed Alteration Agreement. The owner/applicant shall amend, if necessary, and implement the original Section '1602 Master Streambed Alteration Agreement received from CDFW for all construction activities that would occur in the bed and bank of CDFW jurisdictional features within the project and Wildlife site. As outlined in the Master Streambed Alteration Agreement, the owner/applicant shall submit a Sub-Notification Form (SNF) to CDFW 60 days prior to grading and/or the commencement of construction to notifl7 California Department of Fish and Wildlife of the project.

Any conditions of issuance of the Master Streambed Alteration Agreement shall be implemented as part of ihose project construction activities that would adversely affect the bed and bank within on-site drainage channels subject to CDFW jurisdiction. The agreement shall be executed by the owner/applicant and CDFW before the approval of any grading or improvement plans or any construction activities in any project phase that could potentially affect the bed and bank of on-site drainage channels under CDFW jurisdiction.

Mitigation Measure 3.3-2: Valley needlegrass grassland avoidance and minimization measures. The Prior to ground-breaking activities including grading or construction, high visibility construction fencing should be placed around all Valley needlegrass grassland to be preserved. The construction fencing shall not be removed until completion of construction activities.
. All Valley needlegrass grassland areas slated for removal shall be replaced at a 1:l acreage on-site within the preserve areas.
. Needlegrass plants in areas slated for removal shall be salvaged, to the extent feasible, and replanted within the preserve areas. lf this is infeasible, then seedlings/saplings from a local nursery shall be obtained. . A mitigation plan outlining methods to be used, success criteria to be met, and adaptive management strategies shall be completed prior to project construction.

At a minimum, unless agreed upon otherwise with regulatory agencies, the Valley needlegrass grassland creation areas shall be monitored twice annually for the first year and once annually for the four subsequent years for a total of five years; success criteria shall be established to ensure an B0 percent success rate is met by the fifth year, and adaptive management techniques shall be implemented to ensure that the 80 percent success rate is met by the fifth year or as otherwise agreed upon in consultation with CDFW. This plan may be combined with the Operations and Management Plan for the open space preserves.

Mitigation Measure 3.3-3: Oak woodlands mitigation. Starting on page 10-13 of the approved FPASP, the following mitigation provides an update to Mitigation Measure 34.3-5 as published in the MMRP (May 2011).

To fully mitigate for impacts to oak woodlands, the project applicant shall implement one or more of the mitigation measures listed below. Together, the mitigation measures will permanently protect approximately of 396.52-acres of existing Plan Area oak woodlands and create approximately of 245.63-acres of new oak woodland habitat either on-site or with a combination of on-site and off-site location(s). The combined total of existing preserved oak woodlands and newly created oak woodlands will equal approximately 642-acres.fhe final area (acres) of preserved and newly created oak woodlands may be adjusted on a project-by-project basis at the time of tentative parcel or subdivision map approval to compensate for minor changes in oak woodland and isolated oak tree canopy impacts.

Optionl: Preserve Existine Ptan Area Oak Woodlands
The FpASP will permanently preserve and protect approximately 396.52-acres of existing oak woodlands. This figure represents 62 percent of the existing woodland habitat and 65 percent of the existing oak canopy in the Plan Area. @Page 381
12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Hillsborough Area 40 Memo
September 17, 2024

Option 2: Create Oak Woodlands within the Plan Area
. Plant a combination of oak acorns, seedlings and oak trees (refer to Oak Woodlands Mitigation Planting Criteria below)within the boundaries of the Plan Area to create approximately 245.63-acres of new oak woodland habitat in the following Plan Area locations (refer to Open Space Management Plan for allowable planting locations):
. Non-wooded areas that are adjacent to or within the existing oak woodland habitat. . Preserve and passive open space zones throughout the Plan Area. . Open space areas that are adjacent to existing oak woodlands that will be impacted by project grading (i.e. catch slopes).
. Other practical locations within the Plan Area adjacent to open space.

Option 3 : Preserve and Protect Existinq Off-site Oak Woodlands Existing, unprotected oak woodland habitat within Amador, Sacramento, and El Dorado Counties may be secured and placed under conservation easement in lieu of on-site mitigation measures if necessary. The off-site locations would be managed as oak woodland habitat in perpetuity.

Option 4: Create Oak Woodtands Off'site
Plant a combination of oak acorns, seedlings and oak trees at off-site location(s), if needed, following the same guidelines as outlined in the Oak Woodland Mitigation Planting Criteria below. Planted areas would be placed under conseryation easements and managed as oak woodlands in perpetuity.

Oak Woodtands Mitigation Ptanting Criteria
A minimum of 55 planting sites per acre (with a total of 70 units) will be required with additional minimum requirements of #1, #5 and #15 container plantings. Mitigation acreage that is planted solely with larger oak trees (no acorns) will have minimum of 35 planting sites per acre. Plantings will have unit values as outlined below:
. One established acorn equals one unit (acorns will be over planted to maximize potential germination). ' One oak seedling in a #1 container equals two units (minimum of 10 percent required). . One #5 container oak tree equals three units (minimum of 10 percent required). . One #15 container oak tree equals four units ((minimum of 10 percent required). . One Z{-inch boxed oak tree equals six units.
. One transplanted oak tree equals four units per trunk diameter inch (diameter at breast height [DBH]). . The planting of non-oak species will be required as a component of oak woodland mitigation to augment the overall habitat value of these areas. Appropriate non-oak species will be determined by the city at the time of mitigation planting. Each non-oak planting will represent unit values as described above for oak trees, but no more than 10 percent of planting may be non-oak species to count as mitigation.

Ratios of planting types will vary based upon site specific conditions which will require an evaluation of several factors including irrigation needs, access, soil types, and evidence of natural oak recruitment. Some areas may be determined (in consultation with the city arborist) to be best suited for acorn planting only. These areas will not be subject to the minimum planting requirement of #1, #5 and #15 container stock.

Mitigation acreage will be monitored for eight years to ensure that a minimum of B0 percent of planted unit values are successfully established. Trees surviving after eight years, with a minimum of three years without maintenance or irrigation will be considered successfully established. @Page 382
12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Hillsborough Area 40 Memo
September 17, 2024

lsolated Oak Tree Mitigation
lsolated oak trees in commercial and residential development parcels may be removed according to the following criteria:
. Trees rated 0 or 1 may be removed with no mitigation
. Trees rated 2 may be removed with 50 percent of required mitigation . Trees rated 3, 4 or 5 may be removed at full required mitigation lsotated Oak Tree Mitigation Ptanting Criteria
For every one (1) diameter inch of removed oak tree, the mitigation shall be either:
. One half of a 24-inch boxed oak tree or,
. One oak tree in a #15 container or,
. Two oak trees in #5 containers or,
. $150 or a fee set by Folsom City Council resolution.
. Replacement trees may be located within the boundaries of any development parcel, natural parkway, landscape corridor or passive or preserve open space zone. . Native oak trees transplanted within the Plan Area will be granted double mitigation credit.

Exceptions
. lsolated oak trees 24-inch (DBH) in diameter or larger, or a multi-trunked oak trees with an aggregate diameter of 4g-inches or more (DBH) with a rating of 3 to 5 shall be retained unless retaining walls greater than 4-feet in height are required to save the tree.
. tsolated oak trees 12-inch (DBH) to 24-inch (DBH) in diameter with a rating of 4 or 5 shall be retained unless retaining walls greater than 4-feet in height are required to save the tree. Trees with a rating of 2 or 3 may be removed if the cost to preserve the tree is greater than the cost to mitigate its loss based on the lsolated Oak Tree Mitigation Planting criteria above.
. lsolated oak trees 5-inch (DBH) to '12-inch (DBH) in diameter with a rating of 4 or 5 shall be retained unless the cost to preserve the tree is greater than the cost to mitigate its loss based on the lsolated Oak Tree Mitigation Planting criteria above.
. lsolated oak trees 1-inch (DBH) to 5-inch (DBH) in diameter that are preserved may be credited againsi oak tree mitigation requirements as follows:

Table 4.4-1 Small Oak Tree Preservation Credit
Trunk Diameter of Tree to be Preserved Mitigation Tree Size Equivalent 1" or greater, but less than 2' 1 - #'15 container tree or 2 - #5 container trees 2" or greater, but less than 3" 2 - #15 container trees 3" or greater, but less than 4' 3 - #15 container trees 4" or greater, but less than 5" 4 - #'15 container trees Oak Woodtands & lsolated Oak Tree Planting & Maintenance Agreement A planting and maintenance agreement shall include a planting plan, planting and irrigation design details and a monitoring schedule for the S-year establishment period. Trees surviving after 8 years, with a minimum of 3 years without maintenance or irrigation will be considered successfully established. An annual monitoring report shall be completed by 1 December of each year, including a summary of needed corrections, a proposed work plan and AsCENT

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Hillsborough Area 40 Memo
September 17,2024

notice of compliance. All needed corrections shall be completed within 100 calendar days of receipt of the annual monitoring report.
. Performance Security
. Security or other financing mechanisms acceptable to the city shall be required to fulfill the planting and maintenance agreement.
. No Additional Mitigation
' No additional oak woodlands and isolated oak tree canopy mitigation is required for subsequent tentative and final parcel maps, subdivision maps and infrastructure improvement projects that are in compliance with the mitigation requirements of this section, the FPASP Open Space Management Plan and the FPASP EIR/EIS. . Variances
Requests for variances to the isolated oak tree mitigation described above shall follow the process outlined in Folsom Municipal Code chapter 17.62. Any variance request shall be given increased consideration by the city when the purpose of the variance is to preserve additional oak trees > Mitigation Measure 3.3-4: Valley elderberry longhorn beetle avoidance and minimization measures. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Biological Opinion issued by USFWS for the FPASP (USFWS 20'14) before construction can commence within 100 feet of elderberry shrubs. > Mitigation Measure 3.3-5: Vernal pool crustacean avoidance and minimization measures. The project applicant shall purchase vernal pool crustacean preservation credits for direct and indirect impacts and creation credits only for direct impacts at a USFws-approved conservation bank(s) as outlined in the Biological Opinion for the FPASP (USFWS 2014).
> Mitigation Measure 3.3-BA. Conduct environmental training for construction employees. Before beginning construction activities, the project applicant shall employ a qualified biologist to develop and conduct environmental awareness training for construction employees. The training shall describe the importance of on- site biological resources, including special-status wildlife habitats; potential nests of special-status birds;and roosting habitat for special-status bats. The biologist shall explain the importance of other responsibilities related to the protection of wildlife during construction such as inspecting open trenches and looking under vehicles and machinery before moving them to ensure there are no lizards, snakes, small mammals, or other wildlife that could become trapped, injured, or killed in construction areas or under equipment.

The environmental awareness program shall be provided to all construction personnel to brief them on the life history of special-status species in or adjacent to the project area, the need to avoid impacts on sensitive biological resources, any terms and conditions required by state and federal Agencies, and the penalties for not complying with biological mitigation requirements. lf new construction personnel are added to the project, the contractor's superintendent shall ensure that the personnel receive the mandatory training before starting work.

An environmental awareness handout that describes and illustrates sensitive resources to be avoided during project construction and identifies all relevant permit conditions shall be provided to each person. > Mitigation Measure 3.3-88. Conduct preconstruction western spadefoot survey. Before ground breaking activities, the applicant shall comply with all conditions stipulated in the Lake and Streambed Alteration issued by the CDFW for the project as required under Mitigation Measure 3.3-1C. The following shall occur:
. A preconstruction survey shall be conducted for nesting pond turtle by a CDFW approved biologist. lf nesting areas for pond turtles are identified within the survey limits, a buffer area determined in coordination with CDFW shall be established between the construction area and the nesting site. Any western pond turtles observed in the survey limits shall be reported to the CNDDB. . A qualified biological monitor(s) shall be present during construction to relocate any western pond turtles in to suitable habitat up or downstream of the area of disturbance. Before construction, CDFW shall be notified @Page 384
12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Hillsborough Area 40 Memo
September 17,2024

of the intent to conduct western pond turtle monitoring and potential relocation. Any western pond turtles observed during biological monitoring activities shall be reported to the CNDDB. > Mitigation Measure 3.3-10A. Conduct preconstruction Swainson's hawk and other raptor surveys. To mitigate impacts on Swainson's hawk and other raptors, a qualified biologist shall be retained to conduct preconstruction surveys and to identify active nests on and within 0.5 mile of the project area if construction begins during March through August. The surveys shall be conducted less than 14 days and no more than 30 days before the beginning of construction activities/staging. Guidelines provided in Recommended Timing and Methodology for Swainson's Hawk Nesting Surveys in the Central Valley (Swainson's Hawk Technical Advisory Committee 2000) shall be followed for surveys for Swainson's hawk. lf no active/occupied nests are found, no further mitigation is required.
lf active nests are found, impacts on nesting Swainson's hawks and other raptors shall be avoided by establishing appropriate buffers around the nests. No project activity shall commence within the buffer area until the young have fledged, the nest is no longer active, or until a qualified biologist has determined in coordination with CDFW that reducing the buffer would not result in nest abandonment. CDFW guidelines recommend lmplementation of 0.25- or 0.5-mile-wide buffers, but the size of the buffer may be adjusted if a qualified biologist and the City, in consultation with CDFW, determine that such an adjustment would not be likely to adversely affect the nest. Monitoring of the nest by a qualified biologist during and after construction activities shall be required if the activity has potentialto adversely affectthe nest. > Mitigation Measure 3.3-108: Prepare and implement Swainson's hawk mitigation plan. To mitigate for the loss of Swainson's hawk foraging habitat, the project applicant shall identify permanent impacts to foraging habitat and prepare and implement a Swainson's hawk mitigation plan including, but not limited to, the requirements described below.

Before the approval of grading and improvement plans or before any ground-disturbing activities, whichever occurs first for each phase, the project applicant, to the satisfaction of the City, shall secure suitable Swainson's hawk foraging habitat to ensure 1:1 mitigation (or other agreed upon ratio) of habitat value for Swainson's hawk foraging habitat that is permanently lost as a result of the project phase, as determined by the City after consultation with CDFW and a qualified biologist. This foraging habitat would also provide complimentary foraging habitat benefits for other foraging species, such as tri-colored blackbird, because these species forage in similar habitai types (e.g., grasslands, agricultural fields, oak savannahs, oak woodland, and irrigated pastures).

The 1:1 ratio (or other agreed-upon ratio) shall be based on Swainson's hawk nesting distribution and an assessment of habitat quality, availability, and use within the project area. The mitigation ratio shall be consistent with the 1994 Department of Fish and Game's Swainson's Hawk Guidelines included in the Staff Report Regarding Mitigation for lmpacts to Swainson's Hawks (Buteo swainsoni) in the Central Valley of California (Swainson's Hawk Technical Advisory Committee 2000). These call for the following mitigation ratios for loss of foraging habitat in these categories: 1:1 if within one mile of an active nest site, 0.75:1 if over one mile but less than five miles, and

0.5:1 if over five miles and less than 10 miles from an active nest. Such mitigation shall be accomplished through purchase of credits at an approved mitigation bank, or the transfer of fee title or perpetual conservation easement. lf non-bank mitigation is proposed, the mitigation land shall be located within the known foraging area and within Sacramento or Amador counties. The City, after consultation with CDFW, shall determine the appropriateness of the mitigation land.

The project applicant shall transfer said Swainson's hawk mitigation land, through either conservation easement or fee title, to a third-party, nonprofit conservation organization (Conservation Operator), with the City and CDFW named as third-party beneficiaries. The Conservation Operator shall be a qualified conservation easement land manager that manages land as its primary function. Additionally, the Conservation Operator shall be a tax- exempt nonprofit conservation organization that meets the criteria of Civil Code Section 815.3(a)and shall be selected or approved by the City, after consultation with CDFW. After consultation with CDFW and the Conservation Operator, the City shall approve the content and form of the conservation easement. The City, @Page 385
12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Hillsborough Area 40 Memo
September 17,2024

CDFW, and the Conservation Operator shall each have the power to enforce the terms of the conservation easement. The Conservation Operator shall monitor the easement in perpetuity to assure compliance with the terms of the easement.

After consultation with the City, the project applicant, CDFW, and the Conservation Operator, shall establish an endowment or some other financial mechanism that is sufficient to fund in perpetuity the operation, maintenance, management, and enforcement of the conservation easement. lf an endowment is used, either the endowment funds shall be submitted to the City for impacts on lands within the City's jurisdiction to an appropriate third-party nonprofit conservation agency, or they shall be submitted directly to the third-party nonprofit conservation agency in exchange for an agreement to manage and maintain the lands in perpetuity.

The Conservation Operator shall not sell, lease, or transfer any interest of any conservation easement or mitigation land it acquires without prior written approval of the City and CDFW. lf the Conservation Operator ceases to exist, the duty to hold, administer, manage, maintain, and enforce the interest shall be transferred to another entity acceptable to the City and CDFW. The City shall ensure that mitigation habitat established for impacts on habitat within the City's planning area is properly established and is functioning as habitat by conducting regular monitoring of the mitigation site(s) for the first ten years after establishment of the easement.
> Mitigation Measure 3.3-11: Conduct preconstruction burrowing owl survey. To mitigate impacts on burrowing owl, a qualified biologist shall be retained to conduct preconstruction surveys to identify active burrows within the project area. The surveys shall be conducted no less than '14 days and no more than 30 days before the beginning of construction. The preconstruction survey shall follow the protocols outlined in the Staff Reporl on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (CDFG 20'12). Burrowing owls may be present on-site during any season. lf active burrows are found, a mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval before any ground-disturbing activities. The City shall consult with CDFW. The mitigation plan may consist of installation of one-way doors (during the non-breeding season) on all burrows to allow owls to exit, but not reenter, and construction of artificial burrows within the Project vicinity, as needed; however, burrow owl exclusions during the breeding season (February 1-August 3'1) may only be used if a qualified biologist verifies that the burrow does not contain eggs or dependent young. lf active burrows contain eggs and/or young, no construction shall occur within a minimum of 50 meters (164 feet) of the burrow until young have fledged. During the non-breeding season, once it is confirmed that there are no owls inside burrows, the burrows may be collapsed. > Mitigation Measure 3.3-12'. Conduct preconstruction tricolored blackbird nesting survey. To avoid and minimize impacts to tricolored blackbird colonies, a qualified biologist shall conduct a preconstruction survey for any project activity that would occur during the tricolored blackbird's nesting season ('l March - 31 August). The preconstruction survey shall be conducted within 500 feet of potential on-site suitable nesting habitat, including freshwater marsh and areas of riparian scrub vegetation, within the ponds and Alder Creek. The survey shall be conducted within 14 days before project activity begins. lf no tricolored blackbird nesting activity is documented on-site, no further mitigation is required. lf nesting activity is found, the qualified biologist shall consult CDFW to establish a buffer around the nesting colony. No project activity shall commence within the buffer area until a qualified biologist confirms that the colony is no longer active. The size of the buffer shall be determined in consultation with CDFW. Buffer size is anticipated to range from 100 to 500 feet, depending on the nature of the project activity, the extent of existing disturbance in the area, and other relevant circumstances.
lf required by CDFW, the project applicant shall initiate incidental take permit process according to Section 2081 (b) and (c) of the California Fish and Game Code and shall prepare a mitigation plan as an attachment to the 2081 permit.

Avoidance and minimization measures may include protective fencing around sensitive habitat within construction sites, preconstruction notification to CDFW, scientific reporting procedures when an animal is killed, @Page 386
12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Hillsborough Area 40 Memo
September 17, 2024

injured, or trapped, compliance inspections and reports, directions for the acquisition and transfer of habitat management lands, and/or associated funding.
> Mitigation Measure 3.3-13: Preconstruction nesting bird survey. The project applicant shall conduct a preconstruction nesting bird survey of all areas associated with construction activities on the project site within 14 days before commencement of construction during the nesting season (February'1 through August 31). lf active nests are found, a no-disturbance buffer around the nest shall be established. The buffer distance shall be established by a qualified biologist in consultation with CDFW. The buffer shall be maintained until the fledglings are capable of flight and become independent of the nest, to be determined by a qualified biologist.

Once the young are independent of the nest, no further measures are necessary. Pre-construction nesting surveys are not required for construction activity outside of the nesting season. > Mitigation Measure 3.3-15: Preconstruction bat roosting survey. Before construction in any given phase, a pre- construction bat roost survey shall be conducted. A qualified biologist shall conduct a dusk emergence survey (start one hour before sunset and last three hours), followed by a pre-dawn re-entry survey (start one hour before sunrise and last for two hours), as well as a daytime visual inspection of all potential bat roosting habitat within the limits of construction. lf no active bat roosts or sign are observed, construction may proceed. lf no active special-species bat roosts are found, no further measures pertaining to special-species bats are necessary. lf roosting special-species bats are found on-site during the surveys, construction activities shall avoid direct and indirect impacts to roosting sites through the establishment of a no-disturbance buffer of 100 feet around roost sites in consultation with CDFW. Clearing and grubbing adjacent to the roost site and lighting use near the roost site where it would shine on the roost or interfere with bats entering or leaving the roost shall be prohibited.

Operation of internal combustion equipment, such as generators, pumps, and vehicles within100 feet of the roost site shall be prohibited.

The potential environmental impacts related to biological resources and associated with implementation of the project are adequately addressed by the FPASP EIR/ElS, Hillsborough SPA Addendum, and City of Folsom General plan Amendments for lncreased Residential Capacity Project Subsequent ElR, and no additional CEQA documentation is required. Further, pursuant to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, no new information of substantial importance has been identified that would otherwise necessitate subsequent/supplemental environmental analysis.

Cultural Resources
lmplementation of the project would involve the subdivision of Lot 'l of the Hillsborough SPA into a total of seven Iots.

A report was prepared summarizing the project-specific information related to historic and cultural resources for the Hillsborough SPA, including the project site (ECORP 2051b). The FPASP applicants entered into a programmatic agreement with U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and subsequent review of historic resources pertaining to the FPASP area was conducted. All pre-construction mitigation measures, as required by the applicable Historic Property Treatment Plans (HPTPs), have been completed to the satisfaction of the USACE, in consultation with the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO), the City, and the other parties to the first amended programmatic agreement.

Based on pre-construction mitigation measures and findings of the project specific cultural report the site design was modified to avoid on-site resources through re-routing infrastructure, extending conservation easements, and providing interpretive panels near sites.

The following project-level mitigation measure was referenced in the Hillsborough SPA Addendum and City of Folsom General plan Amendments for lncreased Residential Capacity Subsequent EIR analysis and would continue to remain applicable if the project were approved:
> Mitigation Measure 34.7-10: Conduct Construction Personnel Education, Stop Work if Archaeological or paleontological Resources are Discovered, Assess the Significance of the Find, and Prepare and lmplement a Recovery Plan as Required.
tn addition, the following project-specific analysis completed for the Hillsborough SPA Addendum, the below refinements to the mitigation program are applicable to the project (ECORP 2015b):
@Page 387
12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Hillsborough Area 40 Memo
September 17, 2024

> Mitigation Measure 3A.5-1a: Comply with the Programmatic Agreement.

The PA for the proposed project is incorporated by reference. The Programmatic Agreement (PA) provides a management framework for identifying historic properties, determining adverse effects, and resolving those adverse effects as required under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA). The PA is available for public inspection and review at the California Office of Historic Preservation, 1725 23rd Street, Sacramento, CA 95816.

The project and all of its earlier components, including Backbone and non-Backbone portions of the property, have been subjected to cultural resources studies prepared under the PA and subsequent FAPA. Historical resources have been identified, and for the Prairie City Road Business Park and Backbone portions of the project, significant impacts have been determined, and mitigation of significant impacts has been proposed through HpTPs (ECORP 2015b), with concurrence by SHPO. Historical resources have been identified forthe non- Backbone Hillsborough at Easton portion of the project, and consultation with the USACE, SHPO, and the City on the determination of impacts and appropriate mitigation is in progress. The applicable mitigation measures from the HPTPs are provided below, relativeto Mitigation Measure 3A.5-1b,3A.5-2, and 34.5-3.

As of March 2016, two of the three applicable HPTPs for the project have been approved by the USACE with SHPO concurrence (Prairie City Road Business Park and the Backbone lnfrastructure), and one (non-Backbone Hillsborough) is pending approval. Therefore, full compliance with this Mitigation Measure will be satisfied upon:
1)approval of the Hillsborough HPTP and submission of written approvalfrom the USACE and/or SHPO to the City;and2)writtenapprovalfromtheUSACE and/or SHPOof thedocumentationresultingfromimplementation of the applicable portions of the HPTPs for PCRBP, Hillsborough, and the Backbone lnfrastructure. Steps needed to meet the latter are discussed under the subsequent mitigation measures, below:
> Mitigation Measure 3A.5-'1b: Cultural resource inventory, treatment, and evaluation mitigation: These steps may be combined with deliverables and management steps performed for Section 106 provided that management documents prepared for the PA also clearly reference the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) listing criteria and significance thresholds that apply under CEQA. Before ground disturbing work for each individual development phase or off-site element, the applicable oversight agency (City of Folsom or USACE), or the project applicant(s) of all project phases, with applicable agency oversight, shall perform the following actions that are required by the FAPA, or provide proof of compliance for the following:
> The project applicant shall retain the services of a qualified archaeologist to perform an inventory of cultural resources within each individual development phase or off-site element subject to approval under CEQA. ldentified resources shall be evaluated for listing on the CRHR. The inventory report shall also identify locations that are sensitive for undiscovered cultural resources based upon the location of known resources, geomorphology, and topography. The inventory report shall speciflT the location of monitoring of ground- disturbing work in these areas by a qualified archaeologist, and monitoring in the vicinity of identified resources that may be damaged by construction, if appropriate. > The identification of any sensitive locations subject to monitoring during construction of each individual development phase, as determined by the qualified archaeologist, shall be performed in concert with monitoring activities performed under the FAPA to minimize the potential for conflicting requirements. > For each resource that is determined eligible for the CRHR, the applicable agency or the project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development (under the agency's direction) shall obtain the services of a qualified archaeologist who shall determine if implementation of the individual project development would result in damage or destruction of "significant" (under CEQA) cultural resources. These findings shall be reviewed by the applicable agency for consistency with the significance thresholds and treatment measures provided in this EIR/EIS.
> Where possible, the project shall be configured or redesigned to avoid impacts on eligible or listed resources. Alternatively, these resources may be preserved in place if possible, as suggested under California @Page 388
12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Hillsborough Area 40 Memo
September 17,2024

public Resources Code Section 21083.2. Avoidance of historic properties is required under certain circumstances under the Public Resource Code and 36 CFR Part 800' > Where impacts cannot be avoided, the applicable agency or the project applicant(s) of all project phases (under the applicable agency's direction) shall prepare and implement treatment measures that are determined to be necessaryby a qualified archaeologist. These measures may consist of data recovery excavations for resources that are eligible for listing because of the data they contain (which may contribute to research). Alternatively, for historical architectural, engineered, or landscape features, treatment measures may consist of a preparation of interpretive, narrative, or photographic documentation. These measures shall be reviewed by the applicable oversight agency for consistency with the significance thresholds and standards provided in this EIR/EIS.
> To support the evaluation and treatment required under this Mitigation Measure, the archaeologist retained by either the applicable oversight agency or the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall prepare an appropriate prehistoric and historic context that identifies relevant prehistoric, ethnographic, and historic themes and research questions against which to determine the significance of identified resources and a ppropriate treatment.
> These steps and documents may be combined with the phasing of management and documents prepared pursuant to the FAPA to minimize the potential for inconsistency and duplicative management efforts. > Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries shall be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorad o and/or Sacramento Counties, or Caltrans).

As siated and cited above, the project and all of its earlier components, including Backbone and non-backbone portions ofthe property, has been subjected to cultural resources studies prepared underthe PA and subsequent FApA. Historical Resources have been identified through SHPO consultation, preservation in place has been considered and maximized, mitigation of significant impacts has been orwill be proposed through HPTPs, and the HpMP has been revised and updated to incorporate the historic context (Westwood et al. 2013).

The applicable treatment measures specified in the HPTPs have either been completed (Backbone) or will be carried out upon approvaland implementation of the HPTPs for PCRBP and Hillsborough. Following is a detailed list of only the applicable treatment measures for the project and the status of each. Unanticipated discovery and contractor awareness training measures are provided separately, in Mitigation Measures 3A.5-2 and 34.5-3, below.

Treatment 1: Landscape Mapping Districts. Section 4.'1 of the PCRBP HPTP, Section 4.4 of the Backbone HPTP, and Section 4.3 of the draft Hillsborough HPTP require low-level aerial photographyand topographic mapping of the portions of the Rhoades'Diggings Mining District (RDMD) and Alder Creek Corridor Mining District (ACCMD) that fall within the FPASP. Because both districts partly overlap the project area, compliance with this Mitigation Measure is required. The treatment measure in its entirety, as presented in the HPTPs, is as follows:

Low level aerial photography and topographic mapping of the districts within the entire APE will be compleied, which includes both contributing and non-contributing elements. Color multiband digital photography will be collected at or better than 0.5-foot pixel resolution, equating to 1" =100' scale in traditional imagery. Topographic data was already acquired for most of the districts by aircraft-mounted LIDAR equipmentwith an approximate ground pointspacing of betterthan one meter, allowing forthe creation of 1-foot contours at 1" =100' scale, which fulfills the National Mapping Accuracy Standards.

Documentation for the balance of the districts shall be carried out in a similar manner during the "leaf-off' period between November and February. The digital aerial photographs and topographic data shall be incorporated into a Geographic lnformation System database with the ACCMD boundaries delineated, as established below. Preservation and archiving of digital imagery and topographic data shall be carried out in accordance with the requirements of Attachment G of the HPMP (Westwood et a1.2011). The district @Page 389
12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Hillsborough Area 40 Memo
September 17,2024

boundaries shall be permanently established and mapped to establish permanent boundaries for the district within the ApE with sub-meter accuracy. The verification will define the boundaries of the district within the ApE using an updated California Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) 5234 (Primary Record) form, color photography, and a district-level plan map. The feature records for each element of the district will be updated to reflect the new mapping data.

It should be note that low-level aerial photography and LIDAR data collection was carried out in February 2012 for the majority of the project, and supplemental data meeting these standards was acquired August 2014 (collected spring 2008). All data were incorporated into the project's cultural GIS database maintained by ECORP Consulting, lnc. and updated boundaries for the districts and their contributing elements (DPR records) have been prepared and submitted to the USACE and North Central lnformation Center (NCIC). This treatment measure has been satisfied in full. Proof of compliance of the submission of the data to the USACE and NCIC (as applicable) shall be provided to the City.

Treatment 2: Archival Research and Cultural Context. Section 4.1 of the PCRBP HPTP, Section 4.4 of the Backbone HpTp, and Section 4.3 of the draft Hillsborough HPTP require focused archival research and incorporation of information generated by implementation of the HPTP into the cultural context statement in the HPMP. The treatment measure in its entirety, as presented in the HPTPs, is as follows:

Data generated through the implementation of this HPTP and focused archival research conducted or synthesized from previous efforts will be incorporated into the revised cultural context statement for the SPA via the HPMP.

It should be noted that focused archival research was carried out as part of the preparation of the HPMP for the FpASp and applicable technical studies for the project. This research was synthesized into the PHPS and later the HpMp, which were approved by the USACE with SHPO concurrence in June 2012. Upon completion of the implementation of the HPTPs for Hillsborough at Easton, the cultural context in the HPMP shall be revised.

Because the HPMP is a living document that undergoes continual revision, proof of compliance with this treatment measure will be submission of draft interim revised text to the City of Folsom.

Treatment 3: Public lnterpretation. Section 4.'1 of the PCRBP HPTP, Section 4.4 of the Backbone HPTP, and Section 4.3 of the draft Hillsborough HPTP require development of interpretive panels along public trails or at trailheads. The treatment measure states:

The [district] will be interpreted for the benefit of the general public through the development and installation of... interpretive panellsl along trails or at a trailhead, which must be focused on interpreting the ldistrictl... The specific location and content of the panel[s]will be developed in consultation with local historical societies and agencies. lnterpretive panels will measure approximately 24 inches by 36 inches and will be displayed along a newly constructed trail within the permit area.

Conceptual layouts of the interpretive panels, based on the photographic, artistic, and historicalinformation from the subject materials gathered from historical archival research and consultation activities, shall first be developed. Layout and content for the interpretive panels will be reviewed multiple times to ensure the design is appropriate and fitting for all audiences and conveys the historical information pertinent to the permit area. The text shall be reviewed by a professional technical editor for grammar, spelling, and general flow, and will be reviewed by professional cultural resources staff for accuracy of content. All text shall be authored at the fifth-grade reading level.

Upon completion of the preliminary interpretive panel design, the USACE will circulate the conceptualized content and layout to the appropriate consulting parties for review and ask for comments within 30 days.

The USACE will review any comments received within 30 days and revise the content and layout of the interpretive panels as determined appropriate.

The panels will be printed, manufactured, and installed by appropriate and experienced professionals. The location for installation will be selected in consultation between the USACE and project applicant and shall @Page 390
12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Hillsborough Area 40 Memo
September 17, 2024

not disclose the locations of confidential archaeological sites. lmmediately following manufacturing, photographs of the completed panels will be submitted to the USACE as proof of compliance, as installation of the panels may be delayed untiltrails or public facilities are constructed in future phases of the project.

Oiherwise, installation of the panels before the development of ihe property would result in deterioration, as there is no mechanism to maintain the panels until development occurs. lmmediately following installation, photographs and GPS coordinates of the installed panels will be provided to the USACE as final proof of compliance with this requirement.

The requirements for number and subject matter of interpretive panels under these requirements is as follows:
. PCRBP HPTP: one panel for ACCMD plus one panel for RDMD . Hillsborough Draft HPTP: one panel for RDMD (subject to concurrence from USACE and SHPO) . Backbone HPTP: one panel for ACCMD plus two panels for RDMD plus one panel for Native American culture
The requirement for interpretive panels in the Backbone HPTP has been satisfied by the overall specific plan ownership. However, the project shall be required to develop and install the panels specified in the PCRBP and Hillsborough HPTPs, which collectively include one panel for the ACCMD and two panels for the RDMD' Treatment 4: Photo-Documentation of White Rock Road. Section 4.3 of the Backbone HPTP pertains to the documentation requirements for cumulative impacts to ihe historic White Rock Road and Lincoln Highway. The HPTP states:
. Resolution of adverse effect to the White Rock Road and Lincoln Highway shall occur through a combination of focused archival research and field documentation. An expanded cultural contextstatementshall be developed and incorporated into the Historic Property Synthesis report. The cultural context statement will include historic maps, or recreated historic maps, that show the routes of White Rock Road and the Lincoln Highway adjaceni to the SPA during its period of significance' . Field documentation will include photo-documentation of the existing road alignments using black-and- white and color photography, and videography. The photo-documentation will be extensive enough to capture the setting, alignment, and association with adjacent features.

It should be noted that this documentation has already been completed under the Backbone HPTP by the overall specific plan ownership. A copy of the completed and USACE-approved documentation shall be submitted to the City as proof of compliance.

Treatment 4: Photo-Documentation of Contributing Elements. Section 4.1 of the PCRBP HPTP, Section 4.4 of the Backbone HPTP, and Section 4.3 of the Hillsborough HPTP require photo-documentation and updated site records for contributing elements to districts that will be significantly impacted by the project. The treatment measure states:
. There are several types of elements that contribute to the significance of the district. The actions required to resolve adverse effectto each of the classifications on a landscape level are generallythe same and are described below. Non-contributing elements, including hardrock mining features, prospect pits, ranching or farming features, or other features not otherwise identified or affiliated with the district will be indirectly documented via the aerial photography and district-wide mapping discussed above. . Before the initiation of ground disturbance, the affected contributing elements will be documented with high resolution digital photography, videography, and (if applicable) detailed scale drawings. At a minimum, each contributing element must be documented as follows:
. from above using a recent high-resolution aerial photograph that overlays site boundaries; @Page 391
12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Hillsborough Area 40 Memo
September 17,2024

r an updated DPR record;
r photo-documentation using black-and-white and color photography (35mm or high resolution digital), and videography (the photo-documentation will be extensive enough to capture the setting, alignment, and association with adjacent features); and
' all elements that contain extant architecture or culturally-modified natural features shall be further documented using at least two scaled elevation drawings from different angles.

It should be noted that many of the contributing elements that require photo documentation have already been documented and submitted to the USACE for review and approval. The project shall be required to provide proof of USCAE-approved documentation for each of the elements to the City as proof of compliance.

Treatment 5: HAER Documentation. lmpacts to the Rhoades' Branch Ditch will require mitigation through preparation of focused documentation, in accordance with Section 4.1 of the Backbone HPTP and Section 4.1 of the Hillsborough draft HPTP as follows:
' Resolution of adverse effect to the Rhoades' Branch Ditch shall take the form of Historic American Engineering Record (HAER) documentation. To determine the appropriate level of documentation necessary, ihe USACE shall first consult with the National Park Service (NPS), which administers the HAER program.

Consultation with the NPS will be initiated through the submission of the DPR site record and copies of applicable technical reports with a request for review and issuance of a stipulation letter. Unless an objection to the requirements of the stipulation letter is expressed and resolved through the process outlined in the FApA, the level of documentation stipulated by the NPS shall be implemented and all documentation approved bythe USACE and NPS before ground-disturbing activities affecting the resource, orgoverned by the permit conditions. ln addition, focused archival research will be conducted or synthesized from previous efforts to incorporate into the revised cultural context statement for the SPA via the HPMP.

HAER documentation for the Rhoades' Branch Ditch has already been completed by other permittees in the SPA.

The HAER documentation includes the portions that fall within the current APE. The project proponent shall be required to submit proof of acceptance of the HAER documentation from the USACE to the City as proof of compliance.

Treatment 6: Data Recovery Excavation. Significant impacts to one site (P-34-1066) will require mitigation in the form of data recovery excavations, as specified in Section 4.2 of the draft Hillsborough HPTP, subject to concurrence from USACE and SHPO. The Mitigation Measure states:
. Resolution of adverse effect to this site shall take the form of data recovery excavations and detailed documentation, as described in detail in Attachment G of the HPMP (Westwood et a1.2013). All data recovery efforts shall follow a consistent set of standard tasks summarized briefly below. Efforts that are specific to each of these resources, such as the number and placement of data recovery units or other documentation, are described in Table 4.2-2.The methods used for data recovery shall be specified in the HPTP.

The project applicants shall be required to implement the data recovery program specified in the HPTP and submit proof of acceptance from the USACE (via approval on the data recovery report or issuance of a notice to proceed with authorized fill under Stipulation 8 of the FAPA) to the City as proof of compliance Mitigation Measure 34.5-2: Cultural resource construction training and strop work mitigation.

To reduce potential impacts to previously undiscovered cultural resources, the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall do the following:
. Before the start of ground-disturbing activities, the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall retain a qualified archaeologist to conduct training for construction workers as necessary based upon the sensitivity of the project APE, to educate them about the possibility of encountering buried cultural resources, and inform them of the proper procedures should cultural resources be encountered. @Page 392
12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Hillsborough Area 40 Memo
SePtember 17,2024

As a result of the work conducted for Mitigation Measures 3A.5-1a and 3A.5-1b, if the archaeologist determines that any portion of the SPA or the off-site elements should be monitored for potential discovery of as-yet-unknown cultural resources, the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall implement such monitoring in the locations specified by the archaeologist. USACE should review and approve any recommendations by archaeologists with respect to monitoring.

Should any cultural resources, such as structural features, unusual amounts of bone or shell, artifacts, or architectural remains be encountered during any construction activities, work shall be suspended in the vicinity of the find and the appropriate oversight agency(ies) (identified below) shall be notified immediately.

The appropriate oversight agency(ies) shall retain a qualified archaeologist who shall conduct a field investigation of the specific site and shall assess the significance of the find by evaluating the resource for eligibilityfor listing on the CRHR and the NRHP. lf the resource is eligible for listing on the CRHR or NRHP and it would be subject to disturbance or destruction, the actions required in Mitigation Measures 3A.5-1a and 34.5-1b shall be implemented. The oversight agency shall be responsible for approval of recommended mitigation if it is determined to be feasible in light of the approved land uses, and shall implement the approved mitigation before resuming construction activities at the archaeological site.

Mitigation for the off-siie elements outside of the City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and,/or Sacramento Counties, or Caltrans).

The project applicant, in coordination with USACE, shall ensure that an archaeological sensitivity training program is developed and implemented during a pre-construction meeting for construction supervisors. The sensitivity training program shall provide information about notification procedures when potential archaeological material is discovered, procedures for coordination between construction personnel and monitoring personnel, and information about other treatment or issues that may arise if cultural resources (including human remains) are discovered during project construction. This protocol shall be communicated to all new construction personnel during orientation and on a poster that is placed in a visible location inside the construction job trailer. The phone number of the USACE cultural resources staff member shall also be included.

The on-site sensitivity training shall be carried out each time a new contractor will begin work in the APE and at the beginning of each construction season by each contractor. ln the event that unanticipated discoveries of additional Historic Properties, defined in 36 CFR 800.16 (l), are made during the construction of the project, the USACE shall ensure that they will be protected by implementing the following measures:

The Construction Manager, or archaeological monitor, if given the authority to halt construction activities, shall ensure that work in that area is immediately halted within a 100-foot radius of the unanticipated discovery until the find is examined by a person meeting the professional qualifications standards specified in Section 2.2 of Attachment G of the HPMP (Westwood et al. 20'13). The Construction Manager, or archaeological monitor, if present, shall notify the USACE within 24 hours of the discovery.

The USACE shall noti{y the SHPO within one working day of an unanticipated discovery, and may initiate interim treatment measures in accordance with this HPTP. Once the USACE makes a formal determination of eligibility for the resource, the USACE will notify the SHPO within 48 hours of the determination and afford the SHPO an opportunity to comment on appropriate treatment. The SHPO shall respond within 72 hours of the request to consult. Failure of the SHPO to respond within 72 hours shall not prohibit the USACE from implementing the treatment measures.

The project shall be required to submit to the City proof of compliance in the form of a compleied training roster and copy of training materials.

Mitigation Measure 3A.5-3: Human remains mitigation
@Page 393
12/10/2024 Item No.19.

I
Hillsborough Area 40 Memo
SePtember 17,2024

ln accordance with the California Health and Safety Code, if human remains are uncovered during ground- disturbing activities, including those associated with off-site elements, the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall immediately halt all ground-disturbing activities in the area of the find and notify the Sacramento County Coroner and a professional archaeologist skilled in osteological analysis to determine the nature of the remains. The coroner is required to examine all discoveries of human remains within 48 hours of receiving notice of a discovery on private or public lands (California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5tb1). lf the coroner determines that the remains are those of a Native American, he or she must contact the California Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) by phone within 24 hours of making that determination (California Health and Safety Code Section 7050[c]).

After the coroner's findings are complete, the project applicant(s), an archaeologist, and the NAHC- designated Most Likely Descendant (MLD) shall determine the ultimate treatment and disposition of the remains and take appropriate steps to ensure that additional human interments are not disturbed. The responsibilities for acting on notification of a discovery of Native American human remains are identified in Section 5097.9 of the California Public Resources Code.

Upon the discovery of Native American remains, the procedures above regarding involvement of the applicable county coroner, notification of the NAHC, and identification of an MLD shall be followed. The project applicant(s) of all project phases shall ensure that the immediate vicinity (according to generally accepted cultural or archaeological standards and practices) is not damaged or disturbed by further development activity until consultation with the MLD has taken place. The MLD shall have 48 hours after being granted access to the site to inspect the site and make recommendations. A range of possible treatments for the remains may be discussed: nondestructive removal and analysis, preservation in place, relinquishment of the remains and associated items to the descendants, or other culturally appropriate treatment. As suggested by Assembly Bill (AB) 2641 (Chapter 863, Statutes of 2006), the concerned parties may extend discussions beyond the initial 48 hours to allow for the discovery of additional remains. AB 264j(e) includes a list of site protection measures and states that the project applicant(s) shall comply with one or more of the following requirements:
record the site with the NAHC or the appropriate lnformation Center, use an open-space or conservation zoning designation or easement, or record a reinternment document with the county'
The project applicant(s) or its authorized representative of all project phases shall rebury the Native American human remains and associated grave goods with appropriate dignity on the property in a location not subject to further subsurface disturbance if the NAHC is unable to identifu an MLD or if the MLD fails to make a recommendation within 48 hours after being granted access to the site. The project applicant(s) or its authorized representative may also reinter the remains in a location not subject to further disturbance if it rejects the recommendation of the MLD and mediation by the NAHC fails to provide measures acceptable to the landowner. Ground disturbance in the zone of suspended activity shall not recommence without authorization from the archaeologist.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or Sacramento Counties, or Caltrans)' The project applicants shall be required to submit to the City proof of compliance in the form of a completed training roster and copy of training materials
Before the start of ground-disturbing activities, the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall retain a qualified archaeologist to conduct training for construction workers as necessary based upon the sensitivity of the project APE
@Page 394
12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Hillsborough Area 40 Memo
September 17,2024

The potential environmental impacts related to cultural resources and associated with implementation of the project are adequately addressed by the FPASP EIR/EIS, Hillsborough SPA Addendum, and City of Folsom General plan Amendments for lncreased Residential Capacity Project Subsequent ElR, and no additional CEQA documentation is required. Further, pursuant to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, no new information of substantial importance has been identified that would otherwise necessitate subsequent/supplemental environmental analysis.

Energy
Although energy was not previously identified as a specific environmental topic, the FPASP EIR/ EIS and Hillsborough SpA Addendum addressed energy use as part of the air quality, greenhouse gas, and utility impact discussions. The project would involve the subdivision of Lot 1 of the Hillsborough SPA into a total of seven lots. There would be no change in previously planned development analyzed in the Hillsborough SPA Addendum. ln addition, the project would be subject to more stringent regulations related to Title 24 requirements, which were updated in 202'1 and include renewable energy and energy efficiency requirements to reduce energy consumption in new residences. The project would comply with General Plan policies related to renewable energy or energy efficiency and would not conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency. The project would not alter the development type or density at the site such that different or more severe impacts to energy would result. No mitigation measures are required for the project for this issue.

Potential environmental impacts related to energy use and associated with implementation of the project are addressed by the FPASP EIR/ElS, Hillsborough SPA Addendum, and City of Folsom General Plan Amendments for lncreased Residential Capacity Project Subsequent ElR, and no additional CEQA documentation is required. Further, pursuant to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, no new information of substantial importance has been identified that would otherwise necessitate subsequent/supplemental environmental analysis.

Geotogy and Soils
lmplementation of the project would involve the subdivision of Lot 1 of the Hillsborough SPA into a total of seven lots.

The projectwould affectthe same area analyzed fordevelopmentinthe FPASP EIR/EIS and Hillsborough SPA Addendum and proposed changes would not alter the development type or density at the site. No changes related to seismic activity, ground shaking, ground failure, or landslides have occurred. No changes in soils at the site have occurred and the project would not require septic systems. Because the developmeni footprint of the project would be the same as the approved FPASP EIR/EIS, Hillsborough SPA Addendum, and City of Folsom General Plan Amendments for lncreased Residential Capacity Project Subsequent ElR, the impact conclusions pertaining to paleontological resources remain unchanged. The following mitigation measures were referenced in the FPASP EIR/ElS analysis and would continue to remain applicable if the project were approved:
> Mitigation Measure 3A.7-1a: Prepare Site-Specific Geotechnical Report per CBC Requirements and lmplement Appropriate Recommendations
> Mitigation Measure 3A.7-1b'. Monitor Earthwork during Earthmoving Activities > Mitigation Measure 34.7-3: Prepare and lmplement the Appropriate Grading and Erosion Control Plan > Mitigation Measure 34.7-5: Divert Seasonal Water Flows Away from Building Foundations The potential environmental impacts related to geology and soils and associated with implementation of the project are adequately addressed by the FPASP EIR/EIS and Hillsborough SPA Addendum, and no additional CEQA documentation is required. Further, pursuant to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, no new information of substantial importance has been identified that would otherwise necessitate subsequent/supplemental environmental analysis.
@Page 395
12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Hillsborough Area 40 Memo
September 17,2024

Greenhouse Gas Emissions
The types of emissions-generating construction activity would generally be the same under the project as evaluated in the FPASP EIR/EIS and Hillsborough SPA Addendum. Development would be the same in area, size, and intensity to what was approved under the FPASP EIR/EIS and in the Hillsborough SPA Addendum because the project would consist of a lot split. The project would have the same potential for buildout as analyzed in the previous environmental documents. Similarly, overall population projected for the project would not exceed that analyzed in the FPASP EIR/EIS and Hillsborough SPA Addendum. Therefore, the project would not result in any new circumstances involving new significant impacts or substantially more severe impacts pertaining to construction- generated GHG emissions then were identified in the FPASP EIR/EIS and the Hillsborough SPA Addendum.

The project would not result in changes to the type and intensity of development and would comply with more stringent regulations related to GHG reductions than previously evaluated in the FPASP EIR/ElS, Hillsborough SPA Addendum, and City of Folsom General Plan Amendments for lncreased Residential Capacity Project Subsequent ElR.

The following mitigation measures were referenced in the FPASP EIR/EIS analysis and would continue to remain applicable if the project were approved:
> Mitigation Measure 3A.4-1: lmplement Additional Measures to Control Construction-Generated GHG Emissions > Mitigation Measure 3A.4'2a lmplement Additional Measures to Reduce Operational GHG Emissions. > Mitigation Measure 3A.4-2b'. Participate in and lmplement an Urban and Community Forestry Program and/or Off-Site Tree Program to Off-Set Loss of On-Site Trees
Potential environmental impacts related to GHG emissions and associated with implementation of the project are adequately addressed by the FPASP EIR/EIS, the Hillsborough SPA Addendum, and City of Folsom General Plan Amendments for lncreased Residential Capacity Subsequent EIR and no additional CEQA documentation is required.

Further, pursuant to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, no new information of substantial importance has been identified that would otherwise necessitate subsequent/supplemental environmental analysis.

Hazards and Hazardous Materials
The project would not change the overall pattern of development or the types of hazardous materials that would be used, handled, or transported to the site than previously evaluated in the FPASP EIR/EIS, Hillsborough SPA Addendum, and City of Folsom General Plan Amendments for lncreased Residential Capacity Subsequent ElR. No changes to the conditions of the site orthe presence of hazardous materials have occurred since approval of the FPASP. A portion of the project site is located in the Aerojet Superfund site (Area 40). Area 40 has undergone investigation and remediation under the direction of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). Area 40 has 1B designated remedial areas. The following remedial areas within Area 40 are located on the projeci site and their status is described below (RWQCB 2022).
> Aerojet 37B: The site is listed as open as of October 17,2018 for potential contaminants of petroleum and trichloroethylene (TCE) in the groundwater and soil. A remedial plan for the site was issued on August 31,2018 and remediation is ongoing. The October 2022 Program Plan Progress Report states that Aerojet Rocketdyne completed monitoring on the site, including sampling, and is continuing to meet with state agencies to discuss site cleanup.
> Aerojet 38B: The site is listed as open as of October 17,2018 for potential contaminants of perchlorate and other metals in the groundwater and soil. The Remedial Action Plan forthe site was finalized on August 3'1, 20'18 and remediation is ongoing. The October 2022Program Plan Progress Report states that Aerojet Rocketdyne completed monitoring on the site, including sampling, and is continuing to meet with state agencies to discuss site cleanup.
> Aerojet 39B: The site is listed as open as of October 17,2018 for potential contaminants of perchlorate and other metal in the water and soil. Results of soil samples indicated that perchlorate and other metals exist on the site @Page 396
12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Hillsborough Area 40 Memo
September 17,2024

above human health levels. The October 2022Program Plan Progress Report states that Aerojet Rocketdyne completed monitoring on the site, including sampling, and is continuing to meet with state agencies to discuss site cleanup.
> Aerojet Area 40 OU: The site is listed as open - assessment and interim remedial action as of December 22, 2015 for potential contaminants of dioxin, perchlorate, tetrachloroethylene (PCE), TCE, vinyl chloride, and other solvent or non-petroleum hydrocarbons in the groundwater, soil, and surface water. The remedial investigation forthe site has been completed and a feasibility study was prepared in 2016. > Aerojet 40B: The site is listed as open - site assessment as of June 30, 2009 for potential contaminants of perchlorate and other metals in the water and soil. Results from soil sampling indicated levels of other metals and perchlorate above human health screening levels. The October 2022Program Plan Progress Report states that Aerojet Rocketdyne completed monitoring on the site, including sampling, and is continuing to meet with state agencies to discuss site cleanuP.
> Area 40 - Open Space '1: The site is listed as open as of October 17,2018 for potential contaminants of perchlorate in the groundwater and soil. Sampling and analysis has been conducted on the site to determine contaminants that were used and found adjacent to site 37B. Soils were not found to contain contaminants at levels of concern, however the ground water has elevated levels of perchlorate. The Remedial Action Plan for the site was finalized on August 31,2018 and does not require remediation for Open Space 1 because the groundwater contamination would be remediated from the source sites on Area 40 that are affecting Open Space 2 downgrade of the site of contamination'
> Area 40 - Open Space 2: The site is listed as open as of October 17,2018 for potential contaminants of dioxin, perchlorate, and TCE in the groundwater and soil. Sampling and analysis was conducted on the site. Soils were not found to contain contaminants above the level of concern, however the groundwater was found to be present with TCE. The Remedial Action Plan for the site was finalized on August 31,2018 and does not require remediation for Open Space 2 because the groundwater contamination would be remediated from the source sites on Area 40 that are affecting Open Space 2 downgrade of the site of contamination. > Area 40 - Open Space 3: The site is listed as open as of October 17,2018 for potential contaminants of petroleum, dioxin, and TCE in the groundwater and soil. Sampling and analysis has been conducted on the site looking for contaminants that were used and found adjacent to site 378. Groundwater was found to have TCE.

Soils were not found to have any contaminants. The groundwater will be remedied downgradient from the source sites on Area 40. The Remedial Action Plan for the site was finalized on August 31, 2018 and does not require remediation for Open Space 3 because the groundwater contamination would be remediated from the source sites on Area 40 that are affecting Open Space 3 downgrade of the site of contamination.

The Final Remedial Action Plan for Area 40 (2018) includes a remedy consisting of installation of a permeable reactive barrier to treat contaminated groundwater, multiple excavations to remove contaminated soil, and continued monitoring of groundwater, soil vapor, and ambient air conditions at Area 40 to evaluate remedy effectiveness and progress toward cleanup goals. When the remedial actions identified in the Final Remedial Action Plan have been completed the risks posed by residual chemicals, as discussed above, the contamination hazard will be adequately reduced to protect public health. Aerojet anticipates completion of the required covenants and restriction for Area 40 by the end of 2022.lnstallation of the permeable reactive barrier was completed in September through November 2020. Excavations to remove the contaminated soil were completed from September 2019 to )uly 2020 (Central Valley RWQCB 2022).

The type of land uses and proposed buildout on the site has not changed from what was evaluated in the Hillsborough SPA Addendum. Therefore, the same hazards would be present and mitigation in the FPASP EIR/ElS would be required. No newairports have been developed nearthe projectsite and implementation of the project would not conflict with any adopted emergency response or evacuation plans. No changes to the location of the project have occurred and no changes to the risks from wildfires has occurred since approval ofthe FPASP. The @Page 397
12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Hillsborough Area 40 Memo
September 17, 2024

following mitigation measures were referenced in the FPASP EIR/ElS analysis and incorporated by reference into the Hillsborough SPA Addendum and would continue to remain applicable if the project were approved:
> Mitigation Measure 34.8-2: Complete lnvestigations Related to the Extent to Which Soil and/or Groundwater May Have Been Contaminated in Areas Not Covered bythe Phase I and ll Environmental Site Assessments and lmplement Required Measures.
> Mitigation Measure 3A.B-3a: Require the Project Applicant(s) to Cooperate with Aerojet and Regulatory Agencies to Preserve, Modify, or Close Existing Groundwater Monitoring Wells. > Mitigation Measure 3A.B-3b: Coordinate Development Activities to Avoid lnterference with Remediation Activities.
> Mitigation Measure 34.B-3c: Provide Written Notification to the City that DTSC-Required Notification Obligations and/or Easements Have Been Fulfilled to Ensure that Construction Activities Do Not lnterfere with Remedial Actions.
> Mitigation Measure 3A.B-5: Prepare and lmplement a Blasting Safety Plan in Consultation with a Qualified Blaster. > Mitigation Measure 34.8-6: Prudent Avoidance and Notification of EMF Exposure. > Mitigation Measure 3A.8-7: Prepare and lmplement a Vector Control Plan in Consultation with the Sacramento- Yolo Mosquito and Vector Control District.

The potential environmental impacts related to hazards and hazardous materials and associated with implementation of the project are adequately addressed by the FPASP EIR/EIS, Hillsborough SPA Addendum, and City of Folsom General Plan Amendments for lncreased Residential Capacity Project Subsequent ElR, and no additional CEQA documentation is required. Further, pursuant to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, no new information of substantial importance has been identified that would otherwise necessitate subsequent/supplemental environmental analysis.

Hydrotogy and Water Quatity
The project would require grading and construction and could result in significant impacts to water quality because of soil disturbance during construction and alteration of water flows over the site, consistent with the findings of the FPASP EIR/ElS. The project would include the same amount of development and would not change the development footprint as analyzed in the Hillsborough SPA Addendum and City of Folsom General Plan Amendments for lncreased ResidentialCapacity Subsequent ElR. The project would not result in substantial changes to the drainage patterns or flood flows beyond those anticipated in the FPASP EIR/ElS, Hillsborough SPA Addendum, and City of Folsom General Plan Amendments for lncreased Residential Capacity Subsequent ElR. The following mitigation measures were referenced in the FPASP EIR/ElS analysis and incorporated by reference into the Hillsborough SPA Addendum and would continue to remain applicable if the project were approved:
> Mitigation Measure 3A.9-2:Prepare and submit final drainage plans and implement requirements contained in those plans.
> Mitigation Measure Mitigation Measure 3A.9-1: Acquire appropriate regulatory permits and prepare and implement SWPPP and BMPs.
> 34.9-3: Develop and implement a BMP and water quality maintenance plan. > Mitigation Measure 3A.9-4: lnspect and evaluate existing dams within and upstream of the project site and make improvements if necessary.

The potential environmental impacts related to hydrology and water quality and associated with implementation of the project are adequately addressed by the FPASP EIR/ElS, Hillsborough SPA Addendum, and City of Folsom General Plan Amendments for lncreased Residential Capacity Project Subsequent ElR, and no additional CEQA documentation @Page 398
12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Hillsborough Area 40 Memo
September 17,2024

is required. Further, pursuant to Section 15162 of the State cEQA Guidelines, no new information of substantial importance has been identified that would otherwise necessitate subsequent/supplemental environmental analysis.

Land Use and Planning
lmplementation of the project would involve the subdivision of Lot 1 of the Hillsborough SPA into a toial of seven lots.

The project would not result in the physical division of established communities, nor conflict with FPASP land use policies and regulations that protect the environment. There were no mitigation measures included in the FPASP EIR/ElS, the Hillsborough SpA Addendum, or City of Folsom General Plan Amendments for lncreased Residential Capacity Subsequent EIR for this topic and no additional mitigation measures are required for the project for land use and planning.

The potential environmental impacts related to land use and associated with implementation of the project are adequately addressed by the FPASP EIR/EIS, Hillsborough SPA Addendum, and City of Folsom General Plan Amendments for lncreased Residential Capacity Project Subsequent ElR, and no additional CEQA documentation is required. Further, pursuant to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, no new information of substantial importance has been identified that would othenvise necessitate subsequent/supplemental environmental analysis.

Mineral Resources
The project would be located within the Hillsborough Area development and would not change the proposed development footprint. The project would involve the subdivision of Lot '1 of the Hillsborough SPA into a total of seven lots. As described in the Hillsborough SPA Addendum, the project area is identified as containing locally important mineral resources that would be considered to have local, regional, or statewide importance. Kaolin clay was determined in the FpSAp EIR/EIS as having potential economic value. The project would be located on the same area as that examined in the Hillsborough SPA Addendum. Therefore, the project would not result in changes to the potential loss of mineral resources. The following mitigation measure was referenced in the FPASP EIR/ElS analysis and incorporated by reference into the Hillsborough SPA Addendum and would continue to remain applicable if the project were approved:
> Mitigation Measure 3A.7-g'.Conduct Soil Sampling in Areas of the SPA Designated as MRZ-3 for Kaolin Clay and if Found, Delineate its Location and Notify Lead Agency and the California Division of Mines and Geology.

The potential environmental impacts related to mineral resources and associated with implementation of the project are consistent with the conclusions of the FPASP EIR/ElS, Hillsborough SPA Addendum, and City of Folsom General plan Amendments for lncreased Residential Capacity Project Subsequent ElR, and no additional CEQA documentation is required. Further, pursuant to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, no new information of substantial importance has been identified that would othenvise necessitate subsequent/supplemental environmental analysis.

Noise and Vibration
Construction of the project would result in short-term increases in noise related to construction vehicles and equipment. However, construction activities would require the same types and numbers of equipment operating at similar levels of intensity as previousiy evaluated in the FPASP EIR/EIS, City of Folsom General Plan Amendments for lncreased Residential Capacity Subsequent ElR, and Hillsborough SPA Addendum because the project would subdivide the site into seven lots.
ln compliancewith FpASp EIR/Els Mitigation Measure 3A.11-4, a site-specific environmental noise assessmentwas conducted for the Hillsborough SpA as part of the Addendum analysis to evaluate noise impacts from future development. The noise analysis found that mitigation measures beyond those in the FPASP EIR/ElS would be needed to reduce potential impacts related to noise to less than significant.

The project would result in the same development as previously analyzed in the Hillsborough SPA Addendum and City of iolsom General plan Amendments for lncreased Residential Capacity Subsequent ElR. Therefore, proposed increased population and traffic volumes would not change. Potential increases in short- and long-term noise exposure of sensitive receivers would be the same as analyzed in the Hillsborough SPA Addendum and City of @Page 399
12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Hillsborough Area 40 Memo
September 17,2024

Folsom General Plan Amendments for lncreased Residential Capacity Subsequent ElR. The following plan-level mitigation measures were referenced in the FPASP EIR/EIS analysis and incorporated by reference into the Hillsborough SPA Addendum and City of Folsom General Plan Amendments for lncreased Residential Capacity Subsequent EIR and would continue to remain applicable if the project were approved:
> Mitigation Measure 3A.11-1: lmplement Noise-Reducing Construction Practices, Prepare and lmplement a Noise Control Plan, and Monitor and Record Construction Noise Near Sensitive Receptors. > Mitigation Measure 3A.'11-3: lmplement Measures to Prevent Exposure of Sensitive Receptors to Groundborne Noise or Vibration from Project Generated Construction Activities. > Mitigation Measure 3A.11-4: lmplement Measures to Prevent Exposure of Sensitive Receptors to lncreases in Noise from Project-Generated OperationalTraffic on Off-site and On-site Roadways.

The potential environmental impacts related to noise and vibration associated with implementation of the project are adequately addressed by the FPASP EIR/ElS, Hillsborough SPA Addendum, and City of Folsom General Plan Amendments for lncreased Residential Capacity Project Subsequent ElR, and no additional CEQA documentation is required. Further, pursuant to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, no new information of substantial importance has been identified that would othenvise necessitate subsequent/supplemental environmental analysis.

Population and Housing
lmplementation of the project would result in development consistent with the previously approved Hillsborough SpA. The project would subdivide Lot 1 of the Hillsborough area into seven lots. There would not be an increase in the number of residential units. Therefore, the total projected population for the project would not exceed that evaluated in the FPASP EIR/EIS, Hillsborough SPA Addendum, and City of Folsom General Plan Amendments for lncreased Residential Capacity Subsequent ElR. The project would not displace existing people or housing. No mitigation measures were needed for the certified FPASP EIR/EIS regarding population and housing and no additional mitigation measures are required for the project for this issue.

The potentialenvironmentalimpacts related to population and housing and associated with implementation of the project are adequately addressed by the FPASP EIR/ElS, Hillsborough SPA Addendum, and City of Folsom General plan Amendments for lncreased Residential Capacity Project Subsequent ElR, and no additional CEQA documentation is required. Further, pursuant to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, no new information of substantial importance has been identified that would otherwise necessitate subsequent/supplemental environmental analysis.

Pubtic Services
lmplementation of the project would not change projected population because the project would involve a lot split of Lot 1 of the Hillsborough area into seven lots. Population would not increase beyond that previously evaluated in the FPASp EIR/EtS, Hillsborough SpA Addendum. and City of Folsom General Plan Amendments for lncreased Residential Capacity Subsequent ElR. The project would not change the number of residential units, would be within the previously approved City of Folsom General Plan Amendments for lncreased Residential Capacity Subsequent EIR' and would not result in a larger service area than was previously evaluated. The project would continue to be required to pay its fair share for facilities and services. As such, the project would not increase demand for fire protection, police proiection, schools, or other public services or facilities beyond that anticipated in the FPASP EIR/ElS, the Hillsborough SPA Addendum, and City of Folsom General Plan Amendments for lncreased Residential Capacity Subsequent ElR. The following mitigation measures were referenced in the FPASP EIR/ElS analysis and would continue to remain applicable if the project was approved. > Mitigation Measure 3A.14-1'. Prepare and lmplement a Construction Traffic Control Plan. > Mitigation Measure 3A.14-2: lncorporate California Fire Code; City of Folsom Fire Code Requirements; and EDHFD Requirements, if Necessary, into Project Design and Submit Project Design to the City of Folsom Fire Department for Review and Approval
@Page 400
12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Hillsborough Area 40 Memo
September 17, 2024

> Mitigation Measure 34.14-3: lncorporate Fire Flow Requirements into Project Designs The potential environmental impacts related to public services and associated with implementation of the project are adequatelyaddressed bythe FPASP EIR/EIS, Hillsborough SPAAddendum, and Cityof Folsom General Plan Amendments for lncreased Residential Capacity Project Subsequent ElR, and no additional CEQA documentation is required. Further, pursuant to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, no new information of substantial importance has been identified that would otherwise necessitate subsequent/supplemental environmental analysis.

Recreation
lmplementation of the project would result in development consistent with the previously approved Hillsborough spA. The project would subdivide Lot 1 into seven lots. The amount of open spaces and parks would be the same as previously analyzed. These open spaces and parks could be used as recreation areas and were included in previous analyses in the Hillsborough SpA Addendum, FPASP EIR/EIS, and City of Folsom General Plan Amendments for lncreased Residential Capacity Subsequent ElR. Quimby park dedication requirements are satisfied by parks located throughout the entire FpASp area, with the Hillsborough development contributing its fair share through dedication of neigfrborhood parkland and payment of an in-lieu fee pursuant to the Public Facilities Financing Plan (PFFP) for the FpASp area. Overall parkland within the FPASP area would remain unchanged and the total FPASP area would continue to meet the City's parkland standard. The project would not result in any further changes to parks within the FpASp. The FpASp EtR/ElS concluded that the impact to existing parks and facilities would be less than significant, and no mitigation was required. The proposed project would not change this conclusion.

The potentialenvironmental impacts related to recreationalfacilities and associated with implementation of the project are adequately addressed by the FPASP EIR/ElS, Hillsborough SPA Addendum, and City of Folsom General plan Amendments for lncreased Residential Capacity Project Subsequent ElR, and no additional CEQA documentation is required. Further, pursuant to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, no new information of substantial importance has been identified that would otherwise necessitate subsequent/supplemental envi ronmental analysis.

Transportation
Senate Bll743, passed in 2013, required the Governor's Offlce of Planning and Research to develop new CEQA Guidelines that address traffic metrics under CEQA. As stated in the legislation (and Section 21099[b][2] of CEQA), upon adoption of the new CEQA guidelines, "automobile delay, as described solely by LOS or similar measures of vehicular capacity or traffic congestion shall not be considered a significant impact on the environment pursuant to this division, except in locations specifically identified in the CEQA guidelines, if any." The Office of Administrative Law approved the updated CEQA Guidelines on December 28, 2018, and the changes are reflected in new CEeA Guidelines (Section 15064.3). State CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3 was added December 28,2018, to address the determination of significance for transportation impacts. Pursuant to the new CEQA Guidelines, vehicle miles traveled (VMT) will replace congestion as the metric for determining transportation impacts.

The CEQA Guidelines state that "lead agencies may elect to be governed by these provisions of this section immediately. Beginning )uly 1,2020, the provisions of this section shall apply statewide." As described above, the updated CEQA Guidelines were not adopted until December 28,2018, and as stated in the CEeA Guidelines Section 15064.3(c), beginning on July 1,2020, the provisions of this section shall apply statewide.

Thus, local agencies had an opt-in period until July 1,2020, to implement the updated guidelines after they were formally aOopteO. Thus, the effective date of the changes to the CEQA Guidelines occurred subsequent to certification of the FpASp EIR/E1S in June 2011, subsequent to the certification of the Hillsborough SPA Addendum in May 2016.

Section 15007 of the CEeA Guidelines addresses amendments to the CEQA Guidelines and states: "lf a document meets the content requirements in effect when the document is sent out for public review, the document shall not need to be revised to conform to any new content requirements in Guideline amendments taking effect before the document is finally approved,, (cEQA Guidelines section 15007tc]). stated another way, because the FPASP EIR/ElS was circulated for public review (and completed) before this change in the CEQA Guidelines, the new provisions regarding vMT do not @
-

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Hillsborough Area 40 Memo
September 17,2024

apply to this project. Therefore, the shift from automobile delay to VMT as the primary metric used to analyze transportation impacts under CEQA, as dictated by CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, does not constitute "new information" as defined in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 and, even if it was "new information," CEQA Guidelines Section 15007 directs that the document "shall not need to be revised" to reflect this information.

A project specific traffic study was prepared for the Hillsborough site to determine project related transportation impacts (Fehr & Peers 2015). Since the FPASP and Hillsborough Addendum were approved, no infrastructure or development work has taken place on the site. The project would be in the same area with the same amount of proposed development as analyzed in the Hillsborough SPA. A second traffic study was completed for the City of Folsom General Plan Amendments for lncreased Residential Capacity Subsequent ElR, which determined that the increased residential development would have less than significant VMT impacts. Circulation patterns would remain unchanged as assumed in the previous environmental document. The project would result in the same development buildout and thus daily vehicle trips as previously analyzed. Because the project is located within the same development footprint analyzed, would result in the same development types and intensities as previously analyzed, and would not result in an increase in total FPASP vehicle trips beyond that previously analyzed, no new or substantially more severe impacts related to VMT would occur.

No other changes to circulation patterns would occur. Therefore, the project would not result in new significant impacts or substantially more severe transportation impacts. The following mitigation measures were referenced in the Hillsborough SPA Addendum analysis and would continue to remain applicable if the project were approved:
> Mitigation Measure 3A.14-1: Prepare and lmplement a Construction Traffic Control Plan. > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-1a: The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the Construction of lmprovements to the Folsom Boulevard/Blue Ravine Road lntersection (lntersection 1). > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-1b: The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the Construction of lmprovements at the Sibley Street/Blue Ravine Road lntersection (lntersection 2)' > Mitigation Measure 3A.'15-'lc: The Applicant Shall Fund and Construct lmprovements to the Scott Road (West)/White Rock Road lntersection (lntersection 28).
> Mitigation Measure 3A.15-1e: Fund and Construct lmprovements to the Hillside Drive/Easton Valley Parkway I ntersection (l ntersection 41).
> Mitigation Measure 3A.15-1f: Fund and Construct lmprovements to the Oak Avenue Parkway/Middle Road lntersection (lntersection 44).
> Mitigation Measure 34.15-1h: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts to the Hazel Avenue/Folsom Bouleva rd I ntersection (Sacramento Cou nty I ntersection 2). > Mitigation Measure 3A.'15-1i: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on the Grant Line RoadAVhite Rock Road lntersection and to White Rock Road widening betwesn the Rancho Cordova City limit to Prairie City Road (Sacramento County lntersection 3). > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-1j: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on Hazel Avenue between Madison Avenue and Curragh Downs Drive (Roadway Segment'10) > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-.11: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on the White Rock RoadAVindfield way lntersection (El Dorado County lntersection 3). > Mitigation Measure 3A.'15-1o: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on Eastbound US 50 as an alternative to improvements at the Folsom Boulevard/US 50 Eastbound Ramps lntersection (Caltrans lntersection 4).
> Mitigation Measure 3A.15-1p: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on the Grant Line Road/ State Route 16 lntersection (Caltrans lntersection 12). @Page 402
12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Hillsborough Area 40 Memo
September 17,2024

> Mitigation Measure 3A.15-'1q: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on Eastbound U.S. 50 between Zinfandel Drive and Sunrise Boulevard (Freeway Segment'1). > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-1r: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on Eastbound U.S. 50 between Hazel Avenue and Folsom Boulevard (Freeway Segment 3). > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-'ls: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on Eastbound U.S. 50 between Folsom Boulevard and Prairie City Road (Freeway Segment 4). > Mitigation Measure 34.15-'1u: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on Westbound U.S. 50 between Prairie City Road and Folsom Boulevard (Freeway Segment 16). > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-1v: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on Westbound U.S. 50 between Hazel Avenue and Sunrise Boulevard (Freeway Segment 18). > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-1w: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on U.S. 50 Eastbound / Folsom Boulevard Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 4). > Mitigation Measure 3A.'15-1x: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on U.S. 50 Eastbound /Prairie City Road Diverge (Freeway Diverge 5). > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-1y: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on U.S. 50 Eastbound /Prairie City Road Direct Merge (Freeway Merge 6)' > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-12'. Participate in FairShare Funding of lmprovementsto Reduce lmpacts on U.S.50 Eastbound / Praiie City Road Flyover On-Ramp to Oak Avenue Parkway Off-Ramp Weave (Freeway Weave 8). > Mitigation Measure 3A.'15-'1aa: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on U.S. 50 Eastbound / Oak Avenue Parkway Loop Merge (Freeway Merge 9). > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-1dd: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on U.S. 50 Westbound / Empire Ranch Road Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 23). > Mitigation Measure 3A.'15-1ee: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on U.S. 50 Westbound / Oak Avenue Parkway Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 29). > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-1ff: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on U.S. 50 Westbound / Praiie City Road Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 32). > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-'1gg: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on U.S. 50 Westbound /Prairie City Road Direct Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 33). > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-1hh: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on U.S. 50 Eastbound / Folsom Boulevard Diverge (Freeway Diverge 34). > Mitigation Measure 3A.'15-1ii: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on U.S. 50 Westbound /Hazel Avenue Direct Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 38). > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-2a: Develop Commercial Support Services and Mixed-use Development Concurrent with Housing Development, and Develop and Provide Options for Alternative Transportation Modes. > Mitigation Measure 3A.'15-2b: Participate in the City's Transportation System Management Fee Program. > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-2c: Participate with the 50 Corridor Transportation Management Association. > Mitigation Measure 34.15-3: Pay Full Cost of ldentified lmprovements that Are Not Funded by the City's Fee Program.
> Mitigation Measure 3A.15-4a: The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the Construction of lmprovements to the Sibley Street/Blue Ravine Road lntersection (Folsom lntersection 2). @Page 403
12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Hillsborough Area 40 Memo
September 17,2024

> Mitigation Measure 3A.15-4b: The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the Construction of lmprovements to the Oak Avenue Parkway/East Bidwell Street lntersection (Folsom lntersection 6). > Mitigation Measure 3A.i5-7c: The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the Construction of lmprovements to the East Bidwell Street/Nesmith Court lntersection (Folsom lntersection 7). > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-4d: The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the Construction of lmprovements to the East Bidwell Street/lron Point Road lntersection (Folsom lntersection 21). > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-4e: The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the Construction of lmprovements to the Serpa Way/ lron Point Road lntersection (Folsom lntersection 23)' > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-4f: The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the Construction of lmprovements to the Empire Ranch Road / lron Point Road lntersection (Folsom lntersection 24). > Mitigation Measure 3A.'15-4g: The Applicant Shall Fund and Construct lmprovements to the Oak Avenue Parkway / Easton Valley Parkway lntersection (Folsom lntersection 33). > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-4i: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on the Grant Line RoadAVhite Rock Road lntersection (Sacramento County lntersection 3). > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-4j: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on Grant Line Road between White Rock Road and Kiefer Boulevard (Sacramento County Roadway Segments 5-7). > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-4k Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on Grant Line Road between Kiefer Boulevard and Jackson Highway (Sacramento County Roadway Segment 8). > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-41: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on Hazel Avenue between Curragh Downs Drive and U.S. 50 Westbound Ramps (Sacramento County Roadway Segment s 12-13).
> Mitigation Measure 3A.15-4m: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on White Rock Road between Grant Line Road and Prairie City Road (Sacramento County Roadway Segment 22). > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-4n: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on White Rock Road between Empire Ranch Road and Carson Crossing Road (Sacramento County Roadway Segment 28) > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-4o: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on the White Rock Road / Carson Crossing Road lntersection (El Dorado County 1)' > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-4p: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on the Hazel Avenue/U.S. 50 Westbound Ramps lntersection (Caltrans lntersection 1). > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-4q: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on Eastbound U.S. 50 between Zinfandel Drive and Sunrise Boulevard (Freeway Segment 1). > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-4r: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on Eastbound u.s. 50 between Rancho Cordova Parkway and Hazel Avenue (Freeway Segment 3). > Mitigation Measure 3A.'15-4s: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on Eastbound U.S. 50 between Folsom Boulevard and Prairie City Road (Freeway Segment 5). > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-4t: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on Eastbound U.S. 50 between Prairie City Road and Oak Avenue Parkway (Freeway Segment 6). > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-4u: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on the U.S. 50 Eastbound /Prairie City Road Slip Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 6). > Mitigation Measure 3A.'15-4v: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on the U.S' 50 Eastbound / Prairie City Road Flyover On Ramp to Oak Avenue Parkway Off Ramp Weave (Freeway Weave 7). @Page 404
12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Hillsborough Area 40 Memo
September 17, 2024

> Mitigation Measure 3A.15-4w: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on U.S. 50 Eastbound / Oak Avenue Parkway Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 8). > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-4x Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on U.S. 50 Westbound / Empire Ranch Road Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 27). > Mitigation Measure 3A.15-4y: Participate in Fair Share Funding of lmprovements to Reduce lmpacts on U.S. 50 Westbound /Prairie City Road Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 35)' ln addition to the mitigation measures in the FPASP EIR/EIS (listed above), the updated traffic study for the Hillsborough Addendum provided the following mitigation measures that would be required for the project (Fehr and Peers 2015):
> Mitigation Measure 4.16-1: Prairie City Road/lron Point Road.

Before the issuance of a building permit, the project applicant shall pay the appropriate fee to the City of Folsom to retime the traffic signal at the Prairie City Road/lron Point Road intersection to the satisfaction of the Community Development Department. The fee will be determined by the City of Folsom based on their standard rates for traffic signal retiming pursuant to Section 12.04.060 of the City's Municipal Code. lmplementation of this improvement would result in acceptable operation (Fehr and Peers 2015). > Mitigation Measure 4.16-2'. East Bidwell Street/lron Point Road.

Project applicant shall pay a fair share fee towards the following improvements to the lron Point Road/East Bidwell Street intersection: Modiiy westbound approach to include three left-turn lanes, two through lanes, and one right-turn lane. This mitigation would not require the acquisition of additional right-of-way. > Mitigation Measure 4.16-3: Scott Road (West)AVhite Rock Road.

The project applicant shall pay a fee towards constructing a westbound left-turn land at the Scott Road (West)AVhite Rock Road intersection.
> Mitigation Measure 4.16-4: Scott Road (East)AVhite Rock Road.

The project applicant shall pay a fee towards adding a southbound left-turn lane and installation of a traffic signal at the Scott Road (East)AVhite Rock Road intersection. > Mitigation Measure 4.16-5: East Bidwell/Scott Road.

The project applicant shall pay the applicable capital improvement program fee, which includes the construction of auxiliary lanes on U.S. 50 from Sunrise Boulevard to East Bidwell Street/Scott Road.

The potential environmental impacts related to transportation/traffic and associated with implementation of the project are consistent with the conclusions of the FPASP EIR/EIS, Hillsborough SPA Addendum, and City of Folsom General Plan Amendments for lncreased Residential Capacity Project Subsequent ElR, and no additional CEQA documentation is required. Further, pursuant to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, no new information of substantial importance has been identified that would otherwise necessitate subsequent/supplemental environmental analysis.

Tribat CutturaI Resources
Assembly Bill (AB) 52, signed by the California governor in September of 2014, establishes a new class of resources under CEQA: "tribal cultural resources." lt requires that lead agencies undertaking CEQA review must, upon written request of a California Native American tribe, begin consultation after the lead agency determines that the application for the project is complete, before a notice of preparation (NOP) of an EIR or notice of intent to adopt a negative declaration or mitigated negative declaration is issued. AB 52 also requires revision to CEQA Appendix G, the environmental checklist. This revision has created a new category for tribal cultural resources (TCRs). @Page 405
12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Hillsborough Area 40 Memo
September 17,2024

An addendum to a previously certified EIR was prepared for the Hillsborough SPA Project, in accordance with Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines. An addendum was determined to be the most appropriate document because none ot the conditions described in Section 15'162, calling for preparation of a subsequent ElR, occurred. The addendum addresses minor technical changes or additions and confirms that the project is consistent with what was previously analyzed under the certified ElR. As such, the addendum did not result in an additional certification; therefore, the AB 52 procedures specified in PRC Sections 21080.3.1(d) and 21080.3.2 did not apply and no tribal consultation under AB 52 was required. The project would be subject to new General Plan implementation programs related to tribal cultural resources adopted as part of the City of Folsom General Plan Amendments for lncreased Residential Capacity Project. Specifically, construction would be suspended in the event of inadvertent discovery of tribal cultural resources and the tribes would be notified (lmplementation Program NCR 9) and tribal cultural resources would be kept confidential (lmplementation Program NCR 10). Further, because the project is adequately addressed by the FPASP EIR/EIS, the Hillsborough SPA Addendum, and City of Folsom General Plan Amendments for lncreased Residential Capacity Subsequent ElR, this analysis is also not required to address TCRs. Mitigation measures discussed above under Cultural Resources that would reduce impacts to previously unknown cultural resources would also reduce potential impacts to TCRs should they be present.

The potential environmental impacts related to TCRs and associated with implementation of the project are consistent with the conclusions of the FPASP EIR/ElS, Hillsborough SPA Addendum, and City of Folsom General Plan Amendments for lncreased Residential Capacity Project Subsequent ElR, and no additional CEQA documentation is required. Further, pursuant to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, no new information of substantial importance has been identified that would otherwise necessitate subsequent/supplemental environmental analysis.

Utitities and Service Systems
Domestic water, sanitary sewer, and storm drainage services for the project would be provided by the City of Folsom.

Electricity would be provided by the Sacramento Municipal Utility District, gas would be provided by Pacific Gas & Electric, ielephone would be provided by AT&T, and cable would be provided by Comcast.

The project would not result in changes to the proposed buildout of Lot 1 or projected population. Therefore, stormwater drainage patterns would not be changed bythe project. ln addition, demand for electricity, 9as, telephone, and cable services would not exceed the amount previously analyzed.

A technical memo was prepared in March 2016 (MacKay & Somps 2016) that compared the sanitary sewer demand of the Hillsborough SPA Project under the approved FPASP to the demand under the project. The Hillsborough SPA Project would decrease demand on sanitary sewer by 0.03 million gallons per day. Because the project would result in a lot split of Lot 1 the proposed development pattern and buildout would not change. Therefore, there would be sufficient water supply and demand to meet project needs, as analyzed in the Hillsborough SPA Addendum. There would be no impacts beyond that already discussed in the FPASP EIR/EIS and Hillsborough SPA Addendum.

Technical analysis was prepared in 2024 for the City of Folsom General Plan Amendments for lncreased Residential Capacity Subsequent EIR to determine impacts of increased development to wastewater infrastructure and water supply. The technical analysis determined that the wastewater conveyance system for the FPASP and existing water supplies would be sufficient to support increased residential development, including development from the project on Lots 15 and 16. There would be no impacts beyond that already discussed in the City of Folsom General Plan Amendments for lncreased Residential Capacity Subsequent ElR.

The project would include the same development and would not exceed the number of units or population evaluated in the FPASP EIR/ElS and City of Folsom General Plan Amendments for lncreased Residential Capacity Subsequent ElR. The FPASP EIR/EIS determined that the Sacramento County Kiefer Landfill, which serves the FPASP area, has adequate capacity, and no substantial changes to landfill capacity or landfill closures have occurred. The appropriate landfills have enough capacity to serve the project during construction and operation. @Page 406
12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Hillsborough Area 40 Memo
September 17,2024

The following mitigation measures were referenced in the FPASP EIR/ElS and City of Folsom General Plan Amendments for lncreased Residential Capacity Subsequent EIR analysis and would continue to remain applicable if the project were approved:
> Mitigation Measure 3A.'16-'1: Submit Proof of Adequate On- and Off-Site Wastewater Conveyance Facilities and lmplement On- and Off-Site lnfrastructure Service Systems or Ensure That Adequate Financing ls Secured. > Mitigation Measure 3A.16-3: Demonstrate Adequate SRWTP Wastewater Treatment Capacity. > Mitigation Measure 3A.16-4: Submit Proof of Adequate EID Off-Site Wastewater Conveyance Facilities and lmplement EID Off-Site lnfrastructure Service Systems of Ensure That Adequate Financing is Secured. > Mitigation Measure 3A.16-5: Demonstrate Adequate El Dorado Hills Wastewater Treatment Plant Capacity. > Mitigation Measure 3A.18-'l: Submit Proof of Surface Water Supply Availability' > Mitigation Measure 3A.18-2a: Submit Proof of Adequate Off-Site Water Conveyance Facilities and lmplement Off-Site lnfrastructure Service System or Ensure That Adequate Financing ls Secured. > Mitigation Measure 3A.18-2b: Demonstrate Adequate Off-Site Water Treatment Capacity (if the Off-Site Water Treatment Plan Option is Selected).

The potential environmental impacts related to utilities and service systems and associated with implementation of the project are adequatelyaddressed bythe FPASP EIR/EIS, Hillsborough SPAAddendum, and Cityof Folsom General plan Amendments for lncreased Residential Capacity Project Subsequent ElR, and no additional CEQA documentation is required. Further, pursuant to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, no new information of substantial importance has been identified that would otherwise necessitate subsequent/supplemental environmental analysis.

Witdfire
tmplementation of the project would involve a lot split of Lot 1 of the Hillsborough SPA development. The project would affect the same area already analyzed and would not alter the development type or density at the site. The site is identified as a moderate fire hazard severity zone and is not near an area of high or very high fire hazard severity, as identified by CAL FtRE (CAL FIRE2022). The project would comply with Wildland-Urban lnterface building code regulations, California Fire Code, Folsom 2035 General Plan Polices and FPASP Polices. The project would not result in an increase in slope or prevailing wind that may exacerbate wildfire risks. There were no mitigation measures included in the FPASP EIR/EIS, Hillsborough SPA Addendum, or City of Folsom General Plan Amendments for lncreased Residential Capacity Subsequent EIR for this topic and no additional mitigation measures are required for the project for this issue.

The potential environmental impacts related to wildfire and associated with implementation of the project are adequately addressed by the FPASP EIR/EIS, Hillsborough SPA Addendum, and City of Folsom General Plan Amendments for lncreased Residential Capacity Project Subsequent EIR (see "Public Services" discussion above), and no additionalCEeA documentation is required. Further, pursuantto Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, no new information of substantial importance has been identified that would otherwise necessitate subsequent/supplemental environmental analysis.

CUMULATIVE IMPACTS
The project would result in the subdivision of Lot '1 of the Hillsborough SPA into seven lots. The project would not result in a change in the development proposed on Lot 1 or a change in population within the approved Hillsborough SpA or City of Folsom General Plan Amendments for lncreased Residential Capacity Subsequent ElR. Mitigation Measures identified in the FPASP EIR/EIS, Hillsborough SPA Addendum, and City of Folsom General Plan @Page 407
12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Hillsborough Area 40 Memo
September 17, 2024

Amendments for lncreased Residential Capacity Project Subsequent EIR would remain applicable to the project.

Therefore, the project would not result in cumulative impacts beyond those previously analyzed.

CONCLUSION
Based on the analysis presented above, implementation of the project is adequately addressed bythe FPASP EIR/ElS, Hillsborough SPA Addendum, and City of Folsom General Plan Amendments for lncreased Residential Capacity Project Subsequent ElR, and no new or substantially more adverse impacts would occur through implementation of the project. As a result, no new environmental document is required, consistent with State CEQA Guidelines Section 1sl62(b).

A5(;LN1

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Hillsborough Area 40 Memo
September 17, 2024

REFERENCES
CAL FIRE. See California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection.

California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. 2022. Fire Nazard Severity Zone Viewer. Available:
https://eg i s.fi re.ca. g ovlF H SZl. Accessed October 18, 2022.

Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board.2022 (lune). Aerojet Rocketedyne Superfund Site Update.

Available:
https://www.waterboards.ca.govlcentralvalley/water-issues/site-cleanup/aerojet/aerojet-2022jun-update.pdf.

Accessed October 27, 2022.

City of Folsom. 2010 (June). Draft Environmental lmpact Report/Draft EnvironmentaL Impact Stotement Folsom South of U.S. S0 Specrfic Plan Project. SCH #200809205'1. Sacramento County, CA. Prepared by AECOM and RMC Water and Environment.
2011 (May). Final Environmental tmpact Report/Draft Environmental lmpact Statement Folsom South of U.S. 50 Specific Plan Project. SCH #2008092051. Sacramento County, CA. Prepared by AECOM and RMC Water and Environment.
2016 (April). Addendum to the Folsom PIan Area Speciftc Plan Final Environmental lmpact Report for the HilLsborough at Easton Area. SCH #2008092051. Sacramento County, CA. Prepared by Ascent Environmental.

ECORP. See ECORP Consulting, lnc.

ECORP Consulting, lnc. 2015a (January 14). Biological Resources Technical Memorandum Hillsborough at Easton Project.
2015b (Janua ry 14). Cultural Resources Assessment to Support an Amendment to the Folsom PIan Area Specific PLan for the Hillsborough at Easton Proiect'
Fehr & Peers. 2015. (February). HiLLsborough Transportation lmpact Study' Geosyntec Consultants. 2018 (August). Aerojet Rocketdyne Final Remedial Action PIan Area 40, OU-l0, Sacramento Cou nty, Californ ia. Available:
https://vwvw.folsom.ca.us/home/showpublisheddocument/332/637463200247630000. Accessed October 27, 2017.

MacKay & Somps. 2016. Hillsborough SPA- Sonitary Sewer AnaLysrs. Technical Memo Reginal Water Quality Control Board.2022. GeoTracker Database. Area 40. Available:
https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/map/?global-id=T'10000012022. Accessed October 27,2022.

RWQCB. See RegionalWater Quality Control Board.

ASCENT

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Attachment A
Mitigation Monitoring and
Reporting Program

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Folsom South of U.S. Highway 50 Specific Plan Project
scH #2008092051
h
F(}LgOsl[
Prepared by:
,trrrcom
May 201 I

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

M it igation lvtonitoring and Report i ng PtoElatn
Folsom South of U.S. Highway 50 Specific Plan Project
Frepared for:

City of Folsom
50 Natoma Street
Folsom, CA 95630
Attention:

David Miller
(916) 355-7222
Prepared by:

AECOM
2020 L Street, Suite 400
Sacramento CA 9581 1
Conlact:

Francine Dunn/Principal (916) 414-5800
&aill
May 2011
P 0711016.@
smls_010

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

INTRODUCTION
In accordarce with the Califomia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resouces Code Section 21000 et seq.) and the State CEQA Guidelines (14 Califomia Code ofRegulations [CCR] Section 15000 et seq.), fte City ofFolsom (City) and the U.S. Army Corps ofEngineers (USACE) prepared an Environmental Irnpact Repod / Environmental Impact Statment (EIR/EIS) that identifies aclverse mvironmental impacts related to construction and operation of the Folsom South ofU.S. Highway 50 Specific Plal Project. The EIRTEIS also identifies mitigation measures that would reduce these impacts to a less-than-significant level, or eliminate the adverse impacts altogether.

CEQA Guidelines require public agencies "to adopt a reporting and monitoring program for changes to the project which it has adopted or made a condition of project approval in order to mitigate or avoid signifimt effects on the environmint." A Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) is required for the proposed project because the EIR identifies potentially significant adverse impacts related to project implementation, and mitigation mmues have been irlentified to reduce those impacts. Adoption ofthe MMRP would occur along with approval ofthe proposed project

PURPOSE OF MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
This MMRP has been prepared to ensue that all required mitigation measues are implemented and completed in a satisfactory manner beiore and during project constuction ald operation. The MMRP may be modified by the City duing projct implementation, as necessary, in response to changing conditions or other refinments. Table i (included at the md of thiidocument) has been prepared to assist the responsible parties in implementing the mitigation masues. The table iclentifies individual mitigation measures, monitoring/mitigation timing, responsible person/agency for implementing the measure, monitoring and reporting procedure, and space to confim implemmtation ofthe mitigation masures. The numbering of mitigation measues follows the numbering sequence foud in the EIR/EIS.

ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
Unless othemise specified haein, the City is responsible for taking all actions necessary to implement the mitigation measues rmder itsluisdiction according to the specifications provided for each measue and for demonsrating that the action has been successfully completed. The City, at its discretion, may delegate implementation responsibility or portions thereofto a licensed confiactor or other designated agent. Areas in grey shading indicate that enforcement is required by an agency other than the City, and therefore no verification is required.

The City would be responsible for overall administation of the MMRP and for verirying that City staffmembers and/or rhe conitruction contractor has completed the necessary actions for each measue. The City would designate a project manager to ovtrsee implementation of the MMRP. Duties of the prcject manager include the following:
, Ensue that routine inspections ofthe construction site ile conducted by appropriate City staff; check plans, reports, and othtr docments required by the MMRP; and conduct report activities > Seroe as a liaison between the City and the contractor or project applicant regarding mitigation monitoring issues. > Complete forms and maintain reports and other records and docrments genemted by the MMRP. > Coordinate and ensure that corrective actions or snforcement measwes are taken, ifnecessary.

The responsible party for implementation ofeach item would identify the staffmembers responsible for coordinating with the City on the MMRP.

REPORTING
The City's project manager shall prepare a monitoring report, upon completion ofthe project, on the compliance ofthe activity witi the re4uired mitigatibn measures. Information regarding inspections md other requirements shall be compiied and explainerl in the report. The report shall be desigaed to simply and clearly identify whether mitigation meaiures have been adequately implemented. At a minimrtrn, each report shall identi! the mitigation mqlsures or conditions to be monitorid for implementation, whether compliance with the mitigation measures or conditions has occurred, the procedures used to ;ssess compliance, and whether further action is required. The monitoring report shall be presented to the City Council.

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PLAN TABLE
The categories idmtified in Table I are described below. , Mitigation Measure - This colum provides the text ofthe mitigation measures identified in the EIR > Timing - This column identifies the time fiame in which the mitigation will take place.

Enforcement - This colmn identifies the party responsible for enforcing compliance with the requirements of the mitigation measure.

Dated Signature for Verification ofConpliance - This column is to be dated and signed by the person (either project m"anager or his/her designee) responsible for verifying compliance with the rcquirements ofthe mitigation neasure. Areas in grey shading do not require verification.

AECOM
Folsom Soufr of U.S. Highway 50 Specifc Plan
City of Folsom
Mfigatjon Monitoring and Reporting Program

12/10/2024 Item No.19.
3A.I AESTHETICS. LAND
AECOM
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Table 1
Mitigation Monitoring and Repofting Plan tor the Folsom South of U.S. Highway 50 Specific Plan Project Dated Signaturc for
verilication of complianceEnforcement
City of Folsom Community
DeYelopment Department
L For those improvements
that would be loeted within
the City of Folsom: City of
Folsom Neighborhood
SeNices Department ild
City of Folsom Community
Developmmt Depattmmt.

2. For the two local roadway
@nnections from Folsom
Heights into El Dorado
Hills: El Dorado County
Community Serices
Department.

3. For the U.S. 50 interchage
improvements: Caltros.

L For all on-site md off-site
facilities that would be
located within the Ctty of
Folsom: City of Folrcm
Neighborhood Sewices
Departmflt od City of
Folsom Community
Development Department.

2. For the off-site detention
b6io: Sdmento County
Plilning Department.

3. For the two local roadways
off-site into El Domdo
Hills: El Dorado County
Community Senices
Department.
lmplementation
ProJect applimt(s) for
my particula
discretionary
developmmt application
adj@nt to U.S. 50.

Prqot applicat(s) for
ay particulu
disqetionary
development
application.

Prqot applicmt(s) for
ay particuld
discretionary
dwelopment
applietion.

1. Plms ad
speifications: before
approval of grading
plas md building
pemits

2. Construction: before
the approval of
occupucy pmits
csociated with
residential md
rcmmqcial units

3. Maintenmce: in
perpetuity
Timing
Before approval of
grading plas md during
construction for all
prcjet phaes.

Before approval of
building permits.
ilitigation teasure
Mitigation M€snrc 3A,1-l: Construct and Maintaitr a Landsope Corridor Adjacent to U.S. 50. The prcject applicat(s) for ay par1iculd discretionary development applietion adjrcent to U.S. 50 sha.ll fund, construct, ad maintain a ladsaped mnidor within the SPA, rcuth of U.S. 50. This rcnidor shall be 50 fet wide, *ept that the lddsaped conidor width shall be reduced to 25 feet adj@4t to the proposed regional mall. Lmdwaping plas ad specifications shall be approved by Caltras ad the City of Folsonq ad constructed by the prgect applimt(s) before the start of e{thmoving rctivities osociated with residential or commercial uits. Lmdscaped il6 would not be required within the prererved oak woodlmds. As prrcticable, ladscaping shall primuily contain native md/or drought tolermt pl4ts.

Ledwaped coridors shall be maintained in perpetuity to the stisf@tion ofthe City ofFolsom.

Mitigatiotr Mssure 3A.1-4: Screen Constmction Staging Areas. The prqect applicat(s) for my particula disoetionay development application shall loote staging ad material storage a6 s fd away from wnsitive biological resoures ad sqsitive lad uses (e.g., residential aeas, schmls, paks) o feoible. Staging ad material storage de6 shall be approved by the apprcpriate agency (idmtified below) before the approval of grading plms for all projrct phces md shall be sremed ftom adjeent occupied lad uses in ealier development phaws to the mdimum extent prrcticable. Screos may include, but ae not limited to, the use of such visual boiss such c berms or fences. The rcrm design shall be approved by the apprcpriate ag6cy to further reduce visual effects to the extent possible.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside ofthe City ofFolsom'sjurisdictional boundaies shall be developed by the prcjrct applicat(s) of each applieble prcject phaw in onsultation with the affeted oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado md/or Sermento Counties, ad Caltras) to reduce to the extent f6ible the visual effects of construction rctivities on adjcnt prcject lmd uses liat have already beo developed.

Mitigation Masure 3A.1-5: Lstablish and Require Conformance to Lighting Standards and Prepare and Implemetrt a Lighting Plan, To redu@ imprcts dsociated with light ad gldg the City shall:
> Establish standads for on-site outdoor lighting to reduce high-intensity nighttime lighting md glae o part ofthe Folsom Spoific Plm design guidelines/stadads. Consideration shall be givm to daign features, nmely directional shielding for sh@t lighting pdking lot lighting, md other substmtial light sources, that would redue effects ofnighuime lighting. In addition, consideration sha.ll be given to the uF ofautomatic shutoffs or motion snsors for lighting features to further reduce excess nighttime light. > Use shielded or rcreened public lighting fixtures to prevent the light fiom shining offofthe surfrce intmded to be illuminated.

To reduce imprcts osociated with light dd glae, the prcj@t applicat(s) of all prcject phoes shall:
> Shield or screen lighting fixtures to direct the light domMd od prevent light spill on adjrcent properties. > Flood ad aa lighting needed for construction activrties, nighttime sporting activities, ad/or wurity shall be wreened or aimed no highq thil 45 degrees above straight dom (half-way betwen straight dom ild staight to the side) when the source is visible from ay of-site rcidential property or public roadway.
> For public lighting in residential neighborhoods, prohibit the use of light fixtures that de ofunusually high intensity or brighhess (e 9., hash mercury vapor, low-pressure rcdium, or fluorewnt bulbs) or that blink or fl*h. > Use appropriate building materials (such a low-glae glasg low-glae building glze or finish, neutral, @tth-toned @lored paint ad roofing materials), shielded or screened lighting, md appropriate signage in the office/commercial aru to prevent light ed glae from advqrely alfecting motorists on neaby roadways.

Folsom Souh of U.S. Highway 50 Specific Plan
City of Folsom