Folsom City Council
December 10, 2024

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Table I
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan for the Folsom South of U.S. Highway 50 Specific Plan Prcject Dated Signature for
Verifi cation of ComplianceEnforcement
City ofFolsom Fire
Depanment, City of Folsom
Comunity Development
Department, ed/or EDHFD
for the 1 78-a6e portion ofthe
SPA within the EDI{FD
serqce aea.
lmplementation
Project applicat(s) of
all prcj@t ph6es.

Timing
Before issuilce of
building pmits ad
isswce of occupacy
pmits or final
inspections for all
prcj@t ph6es.
ilitigation fieasurc
portion of the SPA within the EDHFD swice ae4 if it is detemined through City/El Dorado County negotiations that EDHFD would serye the 178-acre portion ofthe SPA.

3. ln@rporate into Fojet designs applicable requirements bared on the EDHFD fire prevqtion stmddds. For commercia.l development, improvemmt plms showing roadways, lad splits, buildings, fire sprinkler systems, fire dm systems, ad other ommercial building improvements shall be submitted to the EDIIFD for review md approval. For residmtial developmmt, improvement plms showing property lines md adjent steets or rcads; total rcrcage or squae footage of the pael; the fooprint of all structures; ddveway pld view describing width, length, tumouts, tumaounds, radiures, ad surfaces; ad driveway profile viws showing the pscent gmde from the access road to the structure md vertical clqmce shall be submitted to the EDTIFD for reviw md approval.

4. Submit a Fire Prevention Pla Checklist to the EDIIFD for review ad approval before the issume ofbuilding pemits. In addition, residmtial development requiring automation Iire spriuklus sha.ll submit sprinkler design sheet(s) ad hydraulic calculations from a Califomia State Liensed C-16 Contactor.

The City shall not authorire the occupacy ofay st uctues util the prcject applicet(s) have obtained a Certificate ofOccupocy from the City of Folsom Community Development Departsndt verifying that all fire prevention items have ben addressed on-site to the stisfaction of the City of Folrcm Fire Depatrnat dd/or the EDHFD for the 178-acre il€ of the SPA within the EDHFD semice aa Mitigation Mssur€ 34,14-3! Incorporate Fire Flow Requirement! into Project Designs. The prcject applica(s) ofall prcject phares shall incorporate into their prcject designs fire flow requirements bced on the Califomia Fire Codg Folsom Fire Code, md/or EDHFD for those aq of the SPA within the EDHFD reruice ae ad sha.ll vqify to City of Folsom Firc Deparhnent that adequate water flow is available, prior to approval of improvement plas md issumce of occupacy pemits or final inspections for all prcject phases.

Project Paniciprtion in Funding Transportation Improvemetrts a. Within ad-adjrcent to the project boundaies, the Appliot shall construct all fesible physical improvwents necessdy ild available to reduce the sverity of the project's signifimt tasportation-related impacts, which may be subject to fee credits ad./or reimburwment, coordinated by the City, from other fee-paying development prcjets ifavailable with respwt to roads or other facilities that would also serve thore non-project feepaying development prqmts Funding of improvements on the perimeter ofthe proj@t boundaies will be shaed with other developmenVjurisdictions. b. Outside the prqect boundaies, the Applicat shall be responsible for the project's fair shae offeoible physical improvements neessary ad available to redue the severity of the prcj@t's significmt trmsportation-related imprcts within the City of Folsom, in othq jurisdictions ad on State facilities, bred on "cumulative plus prcject conditions." For purposes of this mesurg "cumulative plus prcj@t conditions" refers to development authorired undo the projct as well o developmst @nsistent with approved general plas, iprcific plas, ad oths entitlements in the City ad other jurisdictions. In coes where the prgect's fair shae rcntribution is identified, the shae will be boed on the pro1ect's rclative contribution to trafiic growth uder "cumulative plus prcj@t conditions." The project's contribution towdd such improvements may take my, or some combination, of the following foms:
l. Constructionofroads,roadimprovements,orothertrmsportationfeilitiesoutsidethebounduiesoftheprcject,subjectinsme instmces to fe credit against oths improvements necessitated by the prcject or future reimbursement, coordinated by the City, from otho fe-paying development prcjects ifavailable where the roads or improvemmts at issue would also rerve those non-prcj@t fee paying development projects;

2. The paym{t of imprct fees to the City of Folsom in mounts that @nstitute the project's fair shae contdbutions to the construction of trmsportation facilities to be built or improved within the City, consistmt with the City's Capital Improvemqt Progrm ("CIP');

3. The payment ofother adopted regional imp@t fees that would provide improvements to roadways, interseclions ad/or interchdges that ae affected by multiple jurisdiaions, except whm the proj@t applicmt's paymqts of othq fees or construction of imprcvments within the City of Folrcm creates credit against the payment of regional impet fees;

4. The payment ofimpact f€s to the City ofFolsom in mounts that constitute the project's fair shae contributions to the construction oftrmsportation frcilities md/or improvements within affectedjurisdictions outside ofFolsom, which payments to the City of Folsom md trmsmittal of fees to other agencies would occur through one or more enforc@ble agreements provided that for @h required improvement, there is a rruonable mitigation plil that ensures that (i) the fees collected from the project will be used for 3A.I5 TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION . LAND
Folsom South of U.s. Highway 50 Specific Plan
City of Folsom
AECOM
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting ProgEm53

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Table 1
Mitigation Monitoring and RePorting Plan for the Folsom South of U.S. Highway 50 Specific Plan Prcject Dated Signaturc for
Verif 6tion ol ComplianceEnfomment
City of Folsom Public Works
Department
City of Folsm Public Works
Departmmt
lmplementation
CrB ofFolsom Public
Works Department.

City ofFolsom Public
Works Deptrtrnent.

Timing
A phoing malysis shall
be perfomed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
detmine when the
improvement should be
implmented ad when
fair shae funding
should be paid.

A phuing aa.lysis shall
be pqfomed prior to
approval ofthe {irct
subdivision map to
detemine when the
improvement should be
implmented.
llitigation ileasure
c.
their intmded purpows, ed (ii) the improvements will actually be built within a rsonable period of timg md

5. ThepaymotofimprctfeestotheCityofFolsominmoutsthatconstitutetheproject'sfairshaeontributionstotheconstruction oftrmsportation facilities ad/or improvements on federal or state highways or fr@ways needed in prt beeuse ofthe prcjrct, to be made available to the California Department of Trasportation ("Caltras") if md when Caltras md the City of Folrcm entq into il enforc€ble agreement consistent with state law provided that, for each requircd improvemen! Caltrms h6 a reenable mitigaiion pla that qsures that (i) the fees collected from the prcject will be used for their intmded purpores, md (ii) the improvements will rctually be built within a reasonable period oftime.

In pursuing a single agrement or multiple agrements with ay jurisdictions outside of the City of Folsom that will be affected by traffic from the prcject in order to effectuate proporcd mitigation meoures for improvements outside the City ofFolsom, the City will seek to negotiat;in good faith with these otherjurisdictions to enter into fair ad reoonable drmgem@ts with the intention ofrchieving, within a reconable time period aftr approval ofthe prcj@t's, @mmitnqts for (i) the provision ofadequate "fair shile" mitigation payments from the prcject for out-of-jurisdiction traffrc impacts dd impets on federal ad state fiemys ad highways, ad (ii) reciprocal payments from regional development projects to the City ofFolmm to address cumulative "fair shae" mitigation payments towads iederal ad state freeways ad highways for trasportation-related frcilities ad/or improvemmts within the City of Folsom neessitated by the dwelopment within the region. It is intended that these agrcments shall pmit the participating agencies flexibility in providing cioss-jurisdictional credits ad reimbusements @nsistmt with the general "fair shae" mitigation stmdild, dd require a updated modei run inorporating the best available infomatiotr in order to obtain the mos,t eurate, up-to-date impact 6sssmflt fedible ad to generate the most ecuate, up-to-date estimates ofregional fair shile contibutions. Best efforts should be made to seure funding from iedoal, state ad regional rcurces. These agrcements, moreover, should also include provisions that allow for periodic updates to the traffic modeling on which fair shae paymmt calculations depend in order to @ount for (i) newly approved prcjects cumulatively contributing to trasportation-related impacts ad that therefore should @ntribute to the fitnding ofnecessary improvements (ii) additional thysical improvements recessitated in whole or in part by nwly approved prcjects, md (iii) chaging mst calculations for the @nstruction ofneeded improvements based on chages in the costs ofmaterials, labor, md other inputs.

If trasportation improvements requircd to be constructed 6 mitigalion ae @nstructed prior to prcject implementation, the prqeol will pay its fair shae portion for those improvments.
the
d.
e. In rcnsidering individual prqets within the proj@t d@ (e.g., small-lot tentative subdivision maps or simila dircretionay non- residential approva.ls), the City ofFolsom shall identifi required imprcvements, ed shall bce its calculations for suah prcj@ts'fair shde payments, b6ed on the most rsent traflic modeling (i.e., modeling that @@unts for (i) nwly approved projects cmulatively contibuting to trasportation-related impacts ad that therefore should contribute to the funding of necessary improvoents, (ii) additional physical improv€ments ne€ssitated in whole or in part by newly approved prcjects, md (iii) chaging cost calculations for construction ofneeded improvements based on chages in the msts ofmaterials, labor, ild other inputs).

Mitigalion M@sure 3A.15-1a: The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the Construction oflmprovemen& to th€ Folsom Boulward/Blue Ravine Road Inters€ctiotr (Intersection 1). To flsue that lhe Folmm Boulevad,lBlue Ravine Road intqsection opqates at a eeptable LOS, the eastbound approrch must be reonfigured to consist of two left-tum laes, one through lme, ad one right-tum Iae. The applicut shall pay its proportionate shae of funding of improvments, 6 may be detmined by a nerus study or otho appropriate md reliable mechaism paid for by applicat, to redue lhe impacts to the Folsom Boulwad/Blue Ravine Road intersection (Intssection 1).

Mitigation M€sure 3.d15-1b: The Applietrt Shall Pay a Fair Shrre to Fund the Construction of Improvemetrts at the Sibley Stret/ Blue Ravine Road Int€rsction (Intersection 2). To 6sue thai the Sibley StreeLtslue Ravine Road intersection opsates at a rcceptable LOS, &e northbound approrch must be rwonfigued to @nsist of two left-tum liles, two through laes, ild one ilght-tum lae. The appli@t shall pay its proportionate shde of funding of improvements, d may be detmined by a nexus study or othu appropriate ad reliable mechaism paid for by applicat, to reduce the impacts to the Sibley Stret/Blue Ravine Road intersection (lntss@tion 2) Folsom South of U.s. Highway 50 Specifc Plan
City of FolsomAECOM
Mitbalion Monitoring and Reporting Program 54

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Table 1
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan for the Folsom South of U.S. Highway 50 Specific Plan Project Dated Signature for
Verifi cation ol ComplianceEnforcement
City of Folsom Public Works
Department
Clty of Folsom Public Works
Departmmt
City of Folsm Public Works
Departmdt
Srcmento County Public
Works Depahnmt md
Caltrms
Sacrmento County Public
Works Departrnent
Srcrmento County Public
Wo*s Deparhnent
lmplementation
City of Folsm Public
Works Depdtrnent.

City ofFolsom Public
Works Department.

City ofFolsom Public
Works Department.

Sermento County
Public Works
Department md
Caltras.

Sermflto County
Public Works
Department.

S@rmento County
Public Works
Department.

Timing
A phcing aalysis shall
be perfomed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
daemine when the
improvement should be
implemented.

A phming malysis shall
be perfomed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
detmine when the
improvement should be
implemented.

A phoing aalysis shall
be perfomed prior to
approval ofthe firs
subdivision map to
detemine when the
improvment should be
implemented.

A phoing malysis shall
be perfomed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
detemine when the
improvemmt should be
implemented.

Before prcrject build out.

Design of the White
Rock Road widening to
four laes, from Grat
Line Road to Prairie
City Road, with
inte$ection
improvments has
begu, ad brcause this
widming prqect is
environmmtally cleaed
ad tully fmded, it's
construction is exp@ted
to be complete before
the first phase ofthe
Proposed Project or
altmative is built.

Before prcject build out.

Construction of phaw
two of the llarel
Avenue widening, from
titigdion ileasure
Mitigation Mesure 3A.15-1c: Th€ Applicant Shall Fund and Construct Improvements to lhe Scott Road (West)/White Rock Road Interoection (Intersection 28). To enswe that the S@tt Road (Weso/White Rock Road intersection opqales at m @eptable LOS, a ttaffic signal must be insta.lled.

Mitigation Measure 3A.15-1e: Fund and Construct Improv€metrts to the Hillsid€ Drive/Easton Valley Parkway Intersction (Iniersction 41).

To qsure that the Hillside Drive/Easton Valley Pakway interrection operates at a eceptable LOS, the 6tbound approrch must be reconfigured to onsist of one dedieted left turn lae md two through laes, ad the weslbound apprceh must be re@nfigued to consist of two through lmes ad one dedicated right-tum lme. The applicat shall fud ad onstruct these improvem@ts.

Mitigation M@sure 3A.1$lf: Fund and CoDstruct Improvements to the Oak Avenue Parkway/Middle Road Intersection (Inteisection 44), To ensure that the Oak Avenue Pakway/tr4iddle Road inters@tion opsates at a &@ptable LOS, control all mov@ents with a stop sign. The applimt shall fund ad @nstruct these improvements Mitigation M€sure 3A.15-lh: Participate in Fair Share Funding of Inprovemetrts to Reduce Imprcts to the Htzel Avenue/Folsom Boul€vard Intersection (Sacramento County Inters$tion 2). To qsurethat the Hael Avenue/Iolrcm Boulryild intersection opsates at a acceptable LOS, this intersection must be grade sepaated including "jug hadle" rmps. No at grade improvement is feasible. Grade sepaating ad extended (south) Hzel Avque with improvements to the U.S. so/Hzel Avmue intqchage is a mitigation mruure for the approved Easton-Glenbrough Specific Plm development projst. The applicmt shall pay its proportionate shae offunding ofimprovemmts to the agency responsible for improvemmts, based on a progrm established by that agency to reduce the imp&ts to the Hel Avenue/Folsom Boulevad intersotion (Sumento County Intersection 2).

Mitigation M@sure 3A.15-1i; Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts otr the Grent Line Road/White Rock Road Intersection and to White Rock Road widening between the Rrncho Cordova City limit to Prairie City Road (Sacramento County Intersection 3). Improvments must be made to ensure that the Grat Line Road,Ailhite Rock Road intersection operales at a acceptable LOS. The cunently County proposed White Rock Road widming prcjct will widen ad realign White Rock Road frcm the Rmcho Cordova City limit to the El Dorado County line (this aalysis msumes that the Proposed Project ad build altmatives will widen White Rock Road to five laes from Prairie City road to the El Dorado County Line). This widming includes improvements to the Grmt Line Road intersction md realigning White Rock Road to be the through movment. The improv@ents include two estbound through lfles, one Gtbound right tum lee, two northbound left turn ldes, two northbound right turn laes, two westbound left tum ldes md two westbound through laes. This imprcvement alrc includes the signaliation of the White Rock Road ad Grat Line Road inters@tion. With implementation of this improvement, the intssection would operate at a @eptable LOS A. The applicat shall pay its proportionarc shde offunding ofimprovements to the agency responsible for improvements, bsed on a progm established by that agency to redu@ the impacts to the Grdt Line Road/white Rock Road inter*ction (Sacrmento County Intersection 3).

Mitigation Measure 3A.lalj: Participate in Fair Share Funding oflmprovements to Reduce Impacts on Huel Avenue betw@n Madison Avenue and Curragh Downs Drive (Roadway Segment 10). To ensure that Heel Avenue operales at a rcceptable LOS betw@n Cu[agh Domr Drive md Gold Country Boulevad, Huel Avmue must be widened to six laes. This imprcvemqt is part of the Counry adopted Huel Avenue widening project.

Folsom South of U.S. Highway 50 Specifc Plan
City of Folsom
AECOM
Mfigation Monitoring and Reporting Program55

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Table'l
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan for the Folsom South of U.S, Highway 50 Specific Plan Project Dated Signaturc for
verilication of ComplianceEnforcement
El Dorado County Department
of Tr@sportation
City of Folsom Public Wo*s
Depdtment ad Sumento
County Deparhnent of
Trusportation
Ser@mto County
Department of Tresportation
ad the City of Racho
Cordova Depatment of Public
Works
lmplementation
El Dorado County
Department of
Trasportation.

City of Folrcm Public
Works Department ad
S&rmmto County
Department of
Trmsportation
Sacmento County
Department of
Trmsportation ad the
Cig of Racho Cordova
Depadment ofPublic
Works
Timing
Madison Avmue to
Curagh Doms Drive,
is expected to be
completed by ys 2013,
before the first phre of
the Proposed Prcject or
altmative is complete.

The applimt shall pay
its prcportionate shde
olfunding of
improvements to the
agmcy responsible for
improvements, based on
a progrm established
by that agency to reduce
the impacts to llazel
Avenue betwen
Madison Avque ad
Cunagh Doms Drive
(Srcr@ento County
Roadway Segment l0).

Before project build out.

A phcing malysis
should be performed
prior to approval ofthe
first subdivision map to
detemine duing which
prcject ph6e the
improvmmt should be
built.

Before prcjecl build out.

A phcing aalysis
should be perfomed
prior to approval ofthe
first subdivision map to
detmine during which
project ph6e the
improvemmt should be
built.

Before prcject build out.

A phcing malysis
should be perfomed
prior to approval ofthe
first subdivision map to
detemine during which
prcject phe the
improvdent should be
built.
ilitigation teasure
Mitigation Mosure 3A.15-11: Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on the White Rock Road/Windfield Way Intersection (El Dorado County Inters€ction 3). To msue that the White Rock Road,/Windfield Wary intersection opqates at a rcceptable LOS, the intersection must be signalized ad Fpdate northbound left md right tum laes must be striped. The applicat shall pay its proportionate shae offunding of improv@ents to the agency responsible for improvemmts, bared on a progrm "it"blith"d
by thut ug"ncy to redu@ the impacts to the White Rock RoadAilindfield Way intuwction (El Dorado County Intersection 3).

Mitigation MBsure 3A.15-1o: Participate in Fair Share Funding oflmprovements io Reduce Impacts on Eastbound U.S. 50 as an alternative to improvem€nts at the Folsom Boulward/U.S. 50 Eastboutrd Ramps Intersection (Caltrans Itrters4tion 4). Congestion on rutbound U.S. 50 is eusing vehicles to u* Folsom Boulevad c a alternate pdallel route until they reach U.S. 50, where they must get back on the frway due to the lrck of a paallel route. It is prefqed to alleviate the @ngestion on U.S. 50 tha to upgrade the inter*ction at the end ofthis reliever route. The appli@t shall pay its prcportionate shae offirnding ofimprovements to the agency responsible for improvements, bced on a progrm established by that agflcy to redue the imprcts to the Folsm Boulwad/U.S. 50 Erutbound Rmps intersection (Caltras Intqs@tion 4).

To ensure that the Folsom BoulevrdAj.S. 50 erutbound mps inte$ection operat€s at m rcceptable LOS, auxiliary laes should be added to eotbound U.S. 50 from Hzel Avenue to edt ofFolsom Boulevad. This was reommended in the Traffic Operations Analysis Report for the U.S. 50 Auxiliary Lme Prcjot.

Mitigation Measure 3.d15-1p: Participate in Fair Share Funding oflmprovements to Reduce Impac$ on th€ Grant Line Road/ State Route 16 Intersctiotr (Caltrens Itrtersction 12). To ensure thal the Gret Line Road/State Route 16 intersection operates at d eceptable LOS, the northbound ad southbound approaches must be roonfigured to consist of one left-tum lae md one shaed througb/right-tum lme.

Protected left-tum signal phcing must be provided on the northbound ad southbound approrches. Improvements to the Grdt Line Road/State Route 16 intersection ile @ntained within the County Development F@ Prograr4 ad ae scheduled for Mruue A funding. > Improvements to this intersction must be implemented by Caltras, Srcrmmto County, ad the City of Rmcho Cordova.

The applicot shall pay its proportionate shae offunding ofimprov@ents to the agmcy responsible for improvements, bced on a progrffi established by that agency to redue the impacts to the Gret Line Road./State Route 16 intersection (Calt@s Intssection 12). 56 Folsom South ofU.S. Highway 50 Specifc Plan
City of FolsomAECOM
Mitoation Monitoring and Reporting Program

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Table 1
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan for the Folsom South of U.S. Highway 50 Specific Plan Project Dated Signaturc for
verifi c*ion of ComplianceEntorcmenl
Caltrils
City of Folrcm Public Works
Department ed Sermento
County Departrnent of
Trasportation
City of Folsom Public Works
Department ad Sacrmqto
County Depdtrnmt of
Trasportation
City of Folsom Public Works
Depadment md Sermflto
County Departmqt of
Tresportalion
City of Rdcho Cordova
Departmmt of Public Works
ild S@rmdto County
Department of Trdsportation
lmplementation
Caltres
City ofFolsom Public
Works Departmot ad
Sereento County
Department of
Trosportation
City of Folrcm Public
Works Depdtrnent ad
S@rmqto County
Depanmqt of
Trilsportation
City ofFolsom Public
Works Departmmt md
S@lmento County
Department of
T@sportation
City of Racho Cordova
Department of Public
Works ed S@rmento
County Depadment of
Tmsportation
Timing
Before prcject build out.

Construclion of the
Se]@@to 50 Bus-
Capool Lae ad
Community
Enhilcments Prcject is
expected to be
@mpleted by yea 2013,
before the first phoe of
the Propored Project or
altemative is complete.

Construation ofthe
Sacrmento 50 Bus-
Carpool Lane md
Community
Enhmcments Prqect
hc started sine the
witing of the Draft
EiS/EIR,
Before project build out.

A phaing malysis
should be performed to
detemine during which
prqect phe the
improvwent should be
built.

Before prcject build out.

A phming aalysis
should be perfomed
prior to approval ofthe
first subdivision map to
detmine during which
project phce the
improvement should be
built.

Before project build out.

A phoing malysis
should be perfomed
prior to approval of the
first subdivision map to
detmine during which
prcject phre the
improvement should be
built.

Before prcject build out.

A phming aa.lysis
should be perfomed
prior to approval ofthe
first subdivision map to
detemine duing which
titigation ireasure
Mitigatior Mcssure 3A.15-1q: Participate in Fair Share Funding oflmprovements to Reduce Impacts on Eastbound U.S. 50 between Zinfandel Drive and Sunrise Boulevard (Freway Segmetrt l). To enswe that Edtbound U.S. 50 operates a1 m rcc€ptable LOS between Zinfadel Drive ad Sunrise Boulevrd, a bus-capool (HOV) lae must be constructed. This improvment is curmtly planed as pdt of the Sacrmento 50 Bus-Capool Lae md Comunity Enhmcements Prcj@t. The appli@t shall pay its proportionate shae of funding of improvements to the agmcy responsible for improvements, bced on a progrm established by that agency to reduce the impets to Ectbound U.S. 50 betw@n Zinfedel Drive md Sunrise Boulevad (Frewy Segmmt l).

Mitigatiotr M€sur€ 3A.15-1r: Participate in Fair Share Funding oflmprovemetrts to Reducc Impacts on Estbound U'S. 50 between IIul Avenue and Folsom Boulevard (Frway Segmert 3). To osure that Erutbound U.S. 50 opqates at m acceptable LOS betweq Hzel Avenue ad Folsom Boulevad, a auxiliary lae must be constructed. This improvement was recommended in the Traffic Operations Analysis Report for the U.S. 50 Auxiliry Lee Prcj@t. This improvement is included in the proposed 50 Conidor Mobility Fe Progrm.

The applicat shall pay its proportionate shae offunding ofimprovments to the agency responsible for improvments, bded on a progrm establahed by that agency to redu@ the impacts 10 Eastbound U.S. 50 between Huel Avque md Folrcm Boulevad (Frway Segment 3).

Mitigation Measure 3A,l$.ls: Participat€ in Fair Share Funding oflmprovements to Reduce Impacts on Eastbouad U.S. 50 betwel Folsom Boulevard and Prairie City Roed (Freway Segment 4). To ensure that Eotbound U.S. 50 opqates at il eceptable LOS between Folsom Boulevad ad Prairie City Road, a auxiliary lae must be constructed. This improvement wd recommended in the Tmfiic Operations Analysis Report for the U.S. 50 Auxiliary Loe Project. This improvement is included in the propowd 50 Conidor Mobilrty Fe Prcgrm. The applicmt shall pay its proportionate shde of funding of improvements, as may be detemined by a nens study or othq appiopriate md reliable mrchaism paid for by applimt, to reduce the impacts to Eastbound U.S. 50 between Folsom Boulevad ad Prairie City Road (Frcway Segmqt 4).

Mitigation M@sure 3A.15-1u: Psrticipat€ in Fair Share f'[nditrg oflmprovemetrts to R€duc€ Impscts on Westbound U.S. 50 betwen Prairie City Road and Folsom Boulward (Freway S€ment 16). To ensure thal Westbound U.S. 50 operates at a eceptable LOS betwem Prairie City Road dd Folsm Boulevad, m auxiliary lae must be onstructed. This imptovem@t w6 recommqded in the TraIfic Opaations Analysis Report for the U.S. 50 Auxiliary Lae Project. This improvemmt is included in the proposed 50 Conidor Mobility F@ Progm. The applicat shall pay its proportionate shae of fimding of improvwents, as may be detemined by a nexus study or other appropdate ild reliable mohaism paid for by applicat, to redue the imprcts to Westbound U.S. 50 betwen Prairie City Road ad Folsom Boulevdd (Freeway Segment l6).

Mitigation M€sure 3A.15-1v: Participrte in Fair Share Funding oflmprovements to Reduc€ Impacts on Wqtbound U.S. 50 between Hsel Avenue and Sunrise Boulward (Frway Segment 18). To ensure that Westbound U.S. 50 opqates at m @eptable LOS betwen Hzel Avenue ad Sunrise Boulevad, a auiliay lme must be onstructed. This improvement Ms r@ommended in the Trafiic Opqations Analysis Repo( for the U.S. 50 Auxiliary Lae Project, ad included in the proposed Racho Cordova Pdkway interch@ge prcject.

Improvments to this freway segment must be implemented by Caltrds. The appli@t shall pay its proportionate shae of funding of improvements to the agocy responsible for improvements, based on a progrm established by that agency to redu@ the imprcts to Folsom Souh 0f U.S. Highway 50 Specific Plan
City of Folsom
AECOM
Mitigation Monitoring and Reportjng Program57

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Table 1
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan for the Folsom South of U.S. Highway 50 Specific Plan Project Dated Signaturc lor
Verification ot ComplianceEnforement
Crt of Folsom Public Works
Department ad Sacr@mto
County Depiltment of
Trasportation
City of Folsom Public Works
Depadment md Srcrmento
County Department of
Trmsportation
City of Folsom Public Works
Depdtment
City of Folwm Public Works
Departmqt
City of Folsom Public Works
Departmflt
lmplementation
City of Folsm Public
Works Deparhnent @d
Srcrmento County
Department of
Trmsportation
City ofFolsom Public
Works Depahnent md
Saqmento County
Depdtment of
Trasportation
City of Folsm Public
Works Department
City ofFolsom Public
Works Deptrtrnent
City ofFolsom Public
Works Depatrnent
Timing
prq@t phe the
improvement
Before project build out.

A phcing aalysis
should be perfomed
prior to approval ofthe
first subdivision map to
detemine during which
project ph6e the
improvement should be
built.

Before prcject build oul
A phaing malysis
should be performed
prior to approval ofthe
first subdivision map to
detemine during which
prq@t phase the
improvement should be
built.

Before project build out.

A phming malysis
should be perfomed
prior to approval ofthe
first subdivision map to
detemine during which
proj ect phase the
improvement should be
bui1t.

Beforc prqect build out.

A phasing adysis
should be performed
prior to approval ofthe
first subdivision map to
detemine during which
prcject phre the
improvment should be
built.

Before prqect build out.

A phoing aalysis
should be performed
prior to approwl of the
first subdivision map to
detemine during which
prqect phaw the
improvement should be
built.
titigation lreasure
Westbound U.S. 50 between Heel Avenue md Sunrise Boulevad (Freway Segment 18).

Mitigation Measure 3A.1$lw: Participate in Fair Share Funding oflmprovements to Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Eastbound/Folsom Boulevard Ramp Merge (Freway Merge 4). To ensure that Eotboud U.S. 50 operates at e eceptable LOS at the Folsom Boulevad mergq a ruxiliary lae from the Folsom Boulevdd merge to the Prairie City Road diverge must be constructed. This improvement w6 recommended in the Tra{Iic Operations Analysis Report for the U.S. 50 Auxiliary Lme Prqect. This improvement is included in the proposed 50 Conidor Mobility Fee Progrm. The applicat shall pay its proportionate shae offunding ofimprovements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a progrm established by that agency to reduce the imp@ts to the U.S. 50 Eastbound,/Folsom Boulevad Rmp Mage (Freway Merge 4).

Mitigation Mesure 3A.15-1x: Participate in Fair Share Funding oflmprovements to Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Eastbound/Prairie City Road Diverge @reway Diverge 5). To ensure that Ectbound U.S. 50 operates at m eceptable LOS at the Prairie City Road off-rmp diverge, m auxiliary lae from the Folrcm Boulevad merge must be constructed. This improvemqt ws recommended in the Traftic Operations Analysis Report for the U.S. 50 Auxiliary Lae Proj@t. This auxiliary lae improvemmt is included in the proposed 50 Conidor Mobility F€ Progr@. The applicmt shall pay its proportionate shae of funding of improvemflts, 6 may be detemined by anexus study or othq appropriate ed reliable mechaism paid for by applica! to redue the imprcts to the U.S. 50 Eotbound,/Pairie City Road divqge (Freway Divege 5).

Mitigation Mesure 3A.15-ly: Participrte in Fair Share Funding oflmprovements to Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Eastbourd/Prairie City Road Direct Merge (Freway Merge 6). To ensure that Eotbound IJ.S. 50 operates at m eceptable LOS at the Prairie City Road on- rmp dir@t merge, a auxilidy lae 10 the East Bidwell Street- Scott Road divqge must be constructed. This auxiliary lme improvment is included in the proposed 50 Coridor Mobility Fee Progrm. The applicat shall pay its proportionate shae offunding ofimprovements, 6 mary be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate md reliable mechmism paid for by applicmt, to redu@ the impacts to the U.S. 50 Eotbound/Prairie City Road direct merge (Freeway Merge 6).

Mitigation Measur€ 3A.15-12: Participate in Fair Shere Fundirg oflmprovements to Reduce Impacts otr U.S. 50 Eastbound/Prairie City Road Flyover On-Ramp to Oak Avenue Parkway Off-Ramp Weave (Freway Weav€ 8). To ensure that Erutbound U.S. 50 opqates at @ @ceptable LOS at tbe Prairie City Road flyover on-rmp to Oak Avenue Pakway off-rmp weavg e improvement rcceptable to Caltras should be impl@qted to eliminate the uneceptable weaving conditions. Such m improvement may involve a "braided rmp".

The applirot shall pay its proportionate shae of funding of improvements, as may be detmined by a nens study or other appropriate ad reliable mechaism paid for by applicmt, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Eotbound / Prairie City Road flyovu on-rmp to Oak Avenue Pakway off-rmp weve (Freway Weave 8).

Mitigation Measure 3A.15-1ar: Participate in Fair Share Funditrg oflmprovements to Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Eastbound/Oak Avenue Parkway Loop Merge (Freway M€rge 9). To ensure that Eotbound U.S. 50 operates at il acceptable I,oS at the Oak Avenue Pakway loop moge' a auiliary lme to the Edt Bidwell Street - Scott Road diverge must be constructed. This auxiliary lae improvemdt is included in the proposed 50 Coridor Mobility Fee Progrm. The applicmt shall pay its proportionate shae offunding ofimprovements, 6 may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate ad reliable mechaism paid for by applica! to redu@ the impets to the U.S. 50 Eotbound/ Oak Avenue Pakway loop mage (Freeway Moge 9).

AECOM
Mitigalion Monitoring and Reporting Program
Folsom South of U.S. Highway 50 Specifc Plan
City of Folsom

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Table 1
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan for the Folsom South of U.S. Highway 50 Specific Plan Prcject Dated Signature for
verifi cation of ComplianceEntorcement
City of Folsom Public Works
Department
City of Folsom Public Works
Department
City of Folsom Public Works
Department md Sacmento
County Department of
Trosportation
City of Folrcm Public Works
Department md Srcrmento
County Department of
Trasportation
City of Folsom Public Works
Department ed Saq@ento
County Depatrnent of
Trdsportation
Saqamento County
Department of Trdsportation
dd City of Rilcho Cordova
Department of Public Works
lmplementation
City ofFolsom Public
Works Department
City ofFolsom Public
Works Department
City olFolsom Public
Works Departrnent md
Sermento County
Departmqt of
Trmsportation
City ofFolsom Public
Wo*s Departrnent md
Sacrmento County
Department of
Tmsportation
City ofFolsom Public
Works Depatrnent md
Ser@ento Couty
Department of
Trosportation
Sermento County
Department of
Trasponation ed City
ofRacho Cordova
Timing
Before projea build out.

A phruing malysis
should be perfomed
prior to approval of the
first subdivision map to
detemine during which
project phase the
improvement should be
built.

Before prcject build out.

A phcing aalysis
should be performed
prior to approval ofthe
first subdivision map to
detmine during which
project phase the
improvement should be
built.

Before prcject build out.

A phasing aalysis
should be performed
pdor to approval ofthe
first subdivision map to
detemine during which
project phae the
improvement should be
built.

Before project build out.

A phoing mdysis
should be perfomed
prior to approval of the
first subdivision map to
daemine during which
prcject phe the
improvment should be
built.

Beforc prqect build out.

A phasing malysis
should be performed
prior to approval ofthe
first subdivision map to
detemine during which
prcj&t ph6e the
improvement should be
built.

Before prcject build out.

A phuing aa.lysis
should be perfomed
prior to approval ofthe
titigation ileasure
Mitigation Measure 3.dlS1dd: Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U-S- 50 Westbound/Enpire Ranch Rord Loop Ramp Merge (Freway Merge 23). To ensure that Westbound U.S. 50 opqates at d ac@ptable LOS, the northbound Empire Rach Road loop on mp should start the westbound auiliary lae that ends at the Edt Bidwell Str€t - S@tt Road offrmp. The slip on rmp from wuthbound Empire Rach Road would merge into this extended auxiliary lae. Improvments to this freeMy segment must be implemented by Caltrds. The appli@t shall pay its proportionate shae of funding of improvements, o may be detemined by a nexus study or other appropriate ad reliable mrchaism paid for by applicat, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Westbound/Empire Rach Road loop rmp moge (Freeway Merge 23).

Miligation Mesure 3A.15-1ee: Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvemetrts to Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 W€stbound/Oak Avenue Parkway Loop Ramp Merge (Freway Merge 29). To ensure that Westbound U.S. 50 operates at e acceptable LOS, the northbound Oak Avenue Pakway loop on rmp should start the westbound auxiliary lae that ends at the Pmirie City Road off rmp. The slip on rmp from southbound Oak Avmue Pakway would merge into this extended auxiliary lme. Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrms. The applicmt shall pay its proportionate shae offunding ofimprovements, 6 may be detemined by a nexus study or othq appropriate ad reliable mahaism paid for by applicet, to reduce the impacts to tie U.S. 50 Westboud/Oak Avenue Pakway loop rmp merge (Freeway Merge 29).

Mitigation Measure 3A.15-1If: Participate in Fair Share Funding oflmprovements to Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Wstbound/Prairie City Road Loop Ramp Merge (Freway Merg€ 32). To ensure that Westbound U.S. 50 operates at e eceptable LOS at the Prairie City Road loop rmp merge, m auxiliary lme to tie Folsom Boulevad offrmp divage must be constructed. This auiliay lme improvement is included in the propored 50 Conidor Mobility Fee Progrm. The applicat shall pay its proportionate shde of funding of improvemflts, s may be determined by a nws study or other appropriate ed reliable mechmism paid for by applica! to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Westbound,/Prairie City Road Loop Rmp Merge (Freeway Merge 32).

Mitigation M€sure 3A.15-1gg: Participste in Fair Shar€ Funding oflmprovements to Reducc Impscts on U.S. 50 Westbound/Prairie City Road Dirct Ramp Merge (Freway Merge 33). To ensure that Westbound U.S. 50 operates at a eeptable LOS at the Pairie City Road direct rmp merge, m auxiliary lae to the Folsom Boulevad offrmp diverge must be constructed. This auxiliary lme improvement is included in the proposed 50 Coridor Mobility Fee Progrm. The applicat shall pay its proportionate shae of funding ofimprovements, d may be detemined by a nexus study or other appropriate md reliable mrchaism paid for by applicilt, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Westbound/Prairie City Road direct rmp merge (Freeway Merge 33).

Mitigation Mesure 3A.15-1hh: Participate in Fair Share Funding oflmprovements to Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Eastbound/Folsom Bonlevard Div€rge (Freway Diverge 34). To ensure that Westbound U.S. 50 operates at a ac@ptable LOS at the Folsom Boulevad Divergg a auxiliary lme from the Prairie City Road loop rmp merge mult be consaucted. Improvemflts to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrms. This auxiliary lme improvement is included in the proposed 50 Comidor Mobility Fee Progm. The appli@t shall pay its proportionate shae of funding of improvements, o may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate md rcliable mechaism paid for by applicmt, to reduae the imp@ts to the U.S. 50 Eastbound / Folsom Boulevad diverge (Freeway Diverge 34).

Mitigation Mqsure 3A-1A1ii: Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Westbound/Huel Avenue Direct Ramp Merge (Freeway Merg€ 38), To ensure that Westbound U.S. 50 operates at il @eptable LOS at the Haal Avenue direct rmp merge, a auxiliary lme to the Sunriw Boulevad offrmp diverge must be constructed. This auxiliary lae improvement is included in the proposed 50 Conidor Mobility Fee Progrm. The applirot shall pay its proportionate shae of funding of improvements to Folsom South of U.S. Highway 50 Specific Plan
City ofFolsom 59
AECOM
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Table I
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan for the Folsom South of U.S. Highway 50 Specific Plan Project Dated Signaturc for
Verifi 6tion of ComplianceEntorcement
City of Folsm Public Works
Department.

City of Folsm Public Works
Department.

City of Folrcm Public Works
Department.

City of Folsom Public Works
Department.

City of Folsm Public Works
Depadment
City of Folsom Public Works
Department
lmplementation
Department ofPublic
Works
City of Folsom,
Regional Trmsit, ad
Applicm(s)
City of Folsm ad
Applicilt(s)
City of Folrcm ad
Applicat(s)
50 Conidor
Tmsportation
Meagement
Association ad
Applicmt(s)
City of Folsm md
Applicat(s)
City of Folsm Public
Works Depar&nent.

Timing
first subdivision map to
detmine during which
project phae the
improvemmt should be
built.

Before approval of
improvment plas for
all prqst ph6es ay
particuld discretionary
dwelopmmt application
that includes residential
md commercial or
mixed-use development.

As a condition ofprcjec
approval ad/or c a
condition ofthe
developmflt agr@ment
for all project phres.

Concurflt with
@nstruction for all
prcject phases.

Concurent with
construction for all
prcj@t ph6es.

As a condition of prcject
approval ad/or as a
condition of the
development agre@ent
for all prcject phoes.

Before prcject build out.

A phcing malysis
should be performed
prior to approval ofthe
fiFt subdivision map to
detmine during which
proj@t ph6e the
improvement should be
built
ilitigation teasure
the agmcy responsible for improvments, based on a progrm establish€d by that agency to reduce the imp@ts to the U.S. 50 Westbound/Hzel Avenue direct rmp merge (Freway Merge 38).

Mitigatiotr M@sure 3A.15-2a: Dqelop Comm€rcid Support Senices ard Mixed-use Development Concurretrt witb Ilousing Dw€lopment, and Develop and Provide Options for Alternativ€ Tratrsportation Modes. The prcject applicat(s) for ay particula discretionry development application including rcmmercial or mixed-use development along with residential ures shall develop comocial ad mixed-use development concurent with housing development, to the extent fruible in light of mdket realities ad other considerations, to intemalize vehicle trips. Pedestriil md bicycle facilities sha.ll be implmented to the utisfaaion of the City Public Works Depadment. To further minimize impacts from the increoed demad on uea roadways ad interrections, the prcject applicmt(s) for ay particula discretionary development application involving schools or commercial enters shall develop ad implemot safe ad wcure bicycle paking to promote altemative trasportation uses md reduce the volume of single-occupacy vehicles using ae roadways md intqsections.

The prqect applimt(s) for ay particula discretionuy development application shall participate in capital imprcvements dd operating funds for trilsit seryice to increare the percent of travel by trilsit. The prcj@t's fair-shae patticipation md the csciated timing of the improvements md serie shall be identified in the prcjot conditions of approval ad/or the prqect's development agrement. Improv@ents md service shall be coordinated, 6 necessary, with Folsom Stage Lines md Sacrmento RT.

Mitigation Mcasure 3A,1i2b: Participat€ in th€ City's Transportation System Managem€nt Fee Program. The prcject applicmt(s) for my particula discretionary development application shall pay a appropriate mount into the City's existing Trmsportation System Mmagment F@ Progtm to reduce the numbq of singleoccupmt automobile tmvel on aa roadways md intersrctions.

Mitigetion Measure 3A.15-2c: Participatewith the 50 Corridor Tratrsportstiotr Mrnagement Association, The prcject applirot(s) for ay pdticul{ discretionary development application shall join ad padicipate with the 50 Corridor Trasportation Mmagment Association to rcduce the number of single-occupilt automobile tmvel on trea roadways md inters@tions.

Mitigation Me&sure 3A.15-3: Pay Full Cost ofldentified Improvement3 that Are Not Funded by the City's Fe Program.

In arcordmce with Mruure W, the prcject applirot(s) for ay particula discretionry development application shall provide fair-shae conaibutions to the City's trmsportation imprct fe prcgrm to fully fund improvements only rcquircd because of the Spmific Plm.

Mitigatiotr Mssure 3A.l$4a: The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the Constructiotr oflmprov€ments to the Sibley Street/Blue Ravine Road Inten€ction (Folsom Intersection 2). To ensue that the Sibley Street/Blue Ravine Road intsection operates at a LOS D with less tha the Cumulative No Prcj@t delay, the northbound approrch must be rwonfigured to consist oftwo left-tum l4e, two through lmes, ed one dedicaled right-tum lae. The applicot shall pay its proportionate shae offunding ofimprovements, o may be detemined by a nexus study or other appropriate ad reliable mehaism paid for by applicat, to reduce the imprcts to the Sibley Street/Blue Ravine Road intersction (Folsom Intersection 2).

Mitigation M€sure 3A.15-4b: The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the Construction oflmprov€ments to the Oak Avenue ParkwaylEast Bidwell Stret Int€Nectiotr (Folsom Intersection 6). To msue that the Oak Avmue Pak*aylEct Bidwll Stret intersection operates at a acceptable LOS, the 6tbound (East Bidwell Street) appro@h must be reconfigured to consist oftwo left-tum laes, four through laes ed a right-tm lae, md the westbound (E6t Bidwell Street) appro&h must be reconfigwed to consist of two left- tum lmes, four through ldes, dd a right-tum lae. It is against the City of Folsom policy to have eight lme roads beeuse of the impacts to non motorized trallic ad adjrcent developmenq thereforq this improvement is infecible.

AECOM
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 60
Folsom Souh of U.S. Highway 50 Specifc Plan
City of Folsom

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Table 1
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan for the Folsom South of U.S. Highway 50 Specific Plan Project Dated Signaturc lor
verifi cation ol ComplianceEnforcement
City of Folrcm Public Works
Departm4t
City of Folrcm Public Works
Depatment
City ofFolsom Public Works
Departmqt
City of Folsm Public Works
Department
Semflto County
Depdtment of Trmsportation.
lmplementation
City ofFolsom Public
Works Depaltmmt.

City ofFolsom Public
Works Deparhnent.

City ofFolsom Public
Works Department.

City ofFolsom Public
Works Department.

Sermento County
Deprtment of
Trasportation.

Timing
Before prcject build out.

A phaing oalysis
should be perfomed
prior to approval of the
first subdivision map to
detemine during which
prcject phase the
improvement should be
built.

Before project build out.

A phcing aalysis
should be perfomed
plior to approval of the
first subdivision map to
detemine during which
prcjrct phre the
improvment should be
build.

Before prcject build out
A phcing ualysis
should be performed
prior to approval of the
first subdivision map to
detmine during which
project phce the
improvemmt should be
built.

Before prcject build out.

A phaing aalysis
should be perfomed
prior to approval of the
first subdivision map to
detemine during which
prcject phoe the
improvment should be
built.

Before prqect build out.

A phming aalysis
should be perfomed
prior to approval of the
first subdivision map to
ltitigation Itea6ure
Mitigation Mesure 3A.1$4c: The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the Construction oflmprovements to the Erot Bidwell Street/College Stret Int€Nection (Folsom InteBstion 7). To ensure that the Edt Bidwell Sbeet/CoUege Steet intss@tion operates at rcceptable LOS C or better, the westbound approeh must be rsonfigured to consist ofone left-tum lme, one left-through lag ad two dedicated right-tum lmes. The appli@t shall pay its proportionate shae of funding of improvements, as may be detmined by a nexus study or other appropriate md reliable mechoism paid for by appli@t, to reduce the imp@ts to the E6t Bidwell Str@tNesmith Coun intoswtion (Folsom Intersection 7).

Mitigation M€sure 3A.15-4d: The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Sbare to Fund the Construction oflmprovements to the East Bidwell Street/Iron Point Road Irtersction @olsom Int€rsectiod 2l). To ensure that the E6t Bidwell Street /Iron Point Road inters@tion opeEtes at a eceptable LOS, the northboud approrch must be r@nfigued to consist of two left-tum laes, four through lmes ad a right-tum lag ad the southbound apprcach must be roonfigured to consist of two left-tum lmes, four tirough lmes ad a right-tum lme. It is against the City ofFolsom policy to have eight lae roads beause ofthe impets to non motorized trafiic dd adjrcent development; thqefore, this improvement is infruible.

Mitigation Mqsur€ 3.4-15-4et The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Futrd th€ Construction of Improvements to the Serpa Way/ Iron Point Road Intersction (Folsm Intenection 23). To improve LOS at the Serpa Waryl Iron Point Road intersection, the northbound approaches must be restiped to @nsist of one left-tum lae, one shaed left-through lmes, ad one right-turn lae. The applimt sha.ll pay its proportionate shae offunding ofimprovements, 6 may be determined by a nerus study or othq appropriate ad reliable mechaism paid for by applicat, to reduce the impacts to the Serpa Way/Iron Point Road Inlersstion (Folsm Inte$@tion 23).

Mitigatior M@sure 3A.15-4f: The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund th€ Constructiotr oflmprovemetrts to the Empire Ranch Road/Iron Point Road Itrtenectior (Folsom Int€rs€ction 24). To ensure that the Empire Rmch Road / Iron Point Road intenection operates at a LOS D or better, al1 ofthe following improvements ae required:
> The rutbound approeh must be reconfigured to rcnsist of one left-tum lee, two through laes, md a right-tum lile. > The westbound approrch must be roonfigured to consist of two left-tm laes, one through lae, md a through-right lae. > The northbound approach must be r@onfigured to consist offwo left-tum loes, three through laes, od a right-tm lae. > The southbound appro@h must be reconfigued to consist of two left-tum laes, three through lmes, md a right-tm lme.

The applirot shall pay its proportionate shae of funding of improvments, c may be detmined by a nens study or other appropriate ad reliable mechaism paid for by applicet, to reduce the impacts to the Empire Rach Road / Iron Point Road Intersection (Folrcm Interwction 24).

Mitigation Msure 3A.15-4g: The Applicant Shall Fund and Construct Imprcv€ments to th€ Oak Avenue Parkway/Xaston Valley Parkway Inters€ctiotr (Folsom Itrtereection 33). To ensue that the Oak Av@ue Pak*aylEcton Valley Pakway intqs@tion opqates at d @eptable LOS the southbound approrch must be reconfigured to @nsist of two left-tum las, two through laes, ild two right-tum ldes. The applicmt shall fund ad construct these improvements.

Mitigation Mesure 3A.1i4i: Psrticipate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduc€ Imprcts on the Gratrt Litre Road/Whit€ Rock Road Intenstion (Sacramento County Irtersection 3). To ensure that the Grat Line Road/Whit€ Rock Road intersection opqates at m meptable LOS E or better this intqsection should be repleed by some type of grade sepaated inters@tion or interchage. lmprovements to this intersection ae idfltified in the Saqmento County's Proposed General Pla. Implemqtation of these improvmflts would msist in reducing traffc imp@ts on this intersetion by providing eeptable operation. Inttrsection improvements must be Folsom Soub of U.S. Highway 50 Specific Plan
City of Folsom 6l
AECOM
Mitigalion Monitoring and Reporting Pmgram

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Table 1
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan tor the Folsom South of U.S. Highway 50 SPecific Plan Proiect Dated SignatuE for
verifi cation ol ComplianceEnforcement
S@rmento Couty
Depiltment of Tresportation.

Semento County
Department of Trdsportation.

Srcrmmto County
Department of Trmsportation.

S@lmento County
Depiltment of Trasportation.

Saqmento County
Department of Trespo.tation.
lmplementation
Sacmqto County
Department of
Trusportation.

Sermento Couty
Departmmt of
Trespoflation.

S&]@flto County
Department of
Tmsportation.

Srcrmento Couty
Depanmmt of
Trasportaiion.

S@lmqto County
Departmflt of
Trdsponation.

Timing
detemine during which
prcject ph6e the
improvemmt should be
built.

Before project build out.

A phcing aalysis
should be perfomed
prior to approval of the
first subdivision map to
d+emine during which
pro1rct phrc the
improvment should be
built.

Before prcject build out.

A phoing aalysis
should be pufomed
prior to 4proval ofthe
first subdivision map to
detemine during which
prcjot phae the
improvement should be
built.

Before prcject build out.

A phasing malysis
should be perfomed
prior to eproval of the
first subdivision map to
detemine during which
proj@t phe the
improvenent should be
built.

Before prcjea build out.

A phcing aalysis
should be perfomed
prior to approval ofthe
fi6t subdivision map to
detmine during which
prcject phce the
improvment should be
built.

Before prcject build out.

A phcing aalysis
should be perfomed
prior to approval ofthe
titigation ileasure
implemoted by Saomento County. The applicmt shall pay its proportionate shae of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvments, b6ed on a prog@ established by that agocy to reduce the imp@ts to the Gtat Line Road,/White Rock Road Intersection (Saq@ento County Intasection 3).

Mitigation Mesure 3A.1A4j: Participate in Fair Share Funding oflmprovemetrts to Reduce Impacts otr Grant Line Rosd betwcen White Rock Road and Kiefer Boulward (Sacramento €ounty Roadway Segmetr* 5-7). To improve operation on Grilt Line Road betwe@ White Rock Road ad Kiefs Boulevad, this roadmy segment must be widmed to six laes. This improvemflt is proposed in the Ser@ento CounB md the City of Racho Cordova Gqeral Plas; howevq, it is not in the 2035 MTP. Imprcvemflts to this roadway segment must be implemented by Saqmqto Couty md the City of Rdcho Cordova The applimt shall pay its proportionate shae of funding ofimprovem@ts to the agency responsible for improvments, b6ed on a progrm established by that agqcy to reduce the impacts to Grdt Line Road between White Rock Road ad Kiefq Boulevdd (S@rmento County Roadway Segments 5-7) The identified improv@ent would more tha offset the impacts spcifically relaed to the Folsom South ofU.S. 50 project on tbis roadway segment.

Mitigation M@sure 3A,1A4k Participate in Fair Share Funding oflmprovements to Reduce Impact! on Gratrt Line Road between Kiefer Boulevard and Jackson Highway (Sacramcnto County Roadway Segmetrt 8). To improve opration on Grilt Line Road betwffi Kiefq Boulevad Jackson Highway, this roadway segment could be widened to six laes. This improvement is proposed in the Srcr@ento County md the City of Racho Cordova General Plas; howeva, it is not in the 2035 MTP. Improvemmts to this roadway Fgment must be implemented by Srcrmento County ad the City of Racho Cordova. The applicat shall pay its proportionate shre of funding of improvemmts to the agency responsible for improvements, bued on a progm eslablished by that agmcy to !edu@ the imp&ts to Gret Line Road betweq Kiefq Boulwad md Jackson Highway (Sacrmqto County Roadway Segment 8) The identified improvemqt would more tha offset the imp@ts specifically related 1o the Folsom South ofU.S. 50 projwt on this roadway sgment.

Mitigatiotr Mssure 3A.15-41: Participate in Fair Share Funding oflmprovements to Reduce Impacts on Heel Avenue betw@n Curragh Downs Drive and U.S. 50 W$tbound Ramps (Sacrametrto Cotrnty Roadway Segment s 12-13). To improve operation on Hzel Avenue betweo Cunagh Doms Drive ad the U.S. 50 westbound rmps, this roadwy segmmt could be widmed to eight laes. This improvment is inonsistqt with Src@ento County's goual pla bcause the county's policy requires a maimum roadway cross section of six lmel
Analysis shom later indicates that improvements at the imprcted interswtion in this regment ca be mitigated (se Mitigation Mruure

34.15-a$. Improvements to impacted intqs@tions on this segmqt will imprcve optrations on this roadway sgmqt 04 therefore; mitigate this segmot imprct. The applicat shall pary its proportionate shae offunding ofimprovemots to the agency responsible for improvements, bred on a proglm established by that agensy to redu@ the impacts to Hael Av6ue baween Cunagh Doms Drive md U.S. 50 Westbound Rmps (Sermento County Roadway Segments 12-13).

Mitigstion M@sure 3A.1A4m: Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvemetrts to Reduc€ Impacts otr White R@k Road betwetr Grant Line Road and Prairie City Road (Srcramento County Roadway Segment 22). To improve operation on White Rock Road betweq Grat Line Road ad Prailie City Road, this roadway segment must be widqed to six laes. This improvment is included in the 2035 MTP but is not included in the Srcrmoto County Genoal Pla. Improvemmts to this roadway segment must be implemented by S@rmento County.

The identified improvement would more tha offset the impacts spaifielly related to the Folsom South of U.S. 50 project on this roadwy segment. However, b@as of other development in the region that would substantially incrme traffic levels, this roadmy regrnent rculd @ntinue to opsate at a unrceptable LOS F evm with the caprcity improvemots identified to mitigate Folsom South of U.S. 50 impacts.

The applicat shall pay its proportionate shae offunding of improvements to th€ €ency responsible for improvwents, b6ed on a progrm established by that agqcy to reduce the imprcts to White Rock Road betw@n Grmt Line Road ad Prairie City Road (Srcrmmto County Roadway Segment 22).

Mitigstion M@surc 3.4-1$.4n: Psrticipate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impactu on White Rock Road between Empire Ranch Road and Carson Crossiag Road (Sacramento County Rosdway Segnent 28). To improve opoation on White Rock Road betwen Empire Rmch Road md Carcn Crossing Road, this roadway segmflt must be widqed to six lees. Imp.ovements to this roadway segm@t must be implemmted by Sacrmato County. The applicat shall pay its proportionate shue of funding of imptovemsts to AECOM
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Folsom South of U.S. HiglMay 50 Specific Plan
City of Folsom62

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Table 1
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan for the Folsom South of U.S. Highway 50 SPcific Plan Project Dated Signature lor
Vedfication ot ComplianceEnforcemert
El Dorado County Depdtment
of Public Works.

SrcImfltoCounB
Department of Trasportation.

Capitol South6t Conn@tq
Joint Powers Authority.

Capitol Southst Conn@ter
Joint Powers Authority.

Capitol South%t Connecter
Joint Powers Authority.
lmplementation
El Dondo County
Department of Public
Works.

Sermento County
Departmqt of
Trasportation.

Capitol Southest
Connecter Joint Powers
Authority.

Capitol South6t
Connecter Joint Powm
Authority.

Capitol South6t
Connecter Joint Pow6s
Authority.

Timing
first subdivision map to
detemine during which
prcject ph6e the
improvement should be
built.

Before prcject build out
A phoing malysis
should be performed
prior to approval ofthe
first subdivision map to
detemine dwing which
prqect phe the
improvemmt should be
built.

Before project build out
A phaing oalysis
should be perfomed
prior to approral ofthe
first subdivision map to
daemine during which
prcject phe the
improvment should be
built.

Before prcject build out.

A phasing aalysis
should be perfomed
prior to approval ofthe
first subdivision map to
daemine during which
prcjst phe the
improvement should be
built.

Before prcject build out.

A phoing aa.lysis
should be pufomed
prior to approval ofthe
fi6t subdivision map to
detmine during which
prcject ph6e the
improvemmt should be
built.

Before prcject build out.

A phruing aalysis
should be perfomed
prior to approval ofthe
first subdivision map to
detmine during which
prcj@t ph6e the
Ititigation fleasulE
the agmcy responsible for improvements, bmed on a progm established by that agmcy to redu@ the impacts to White Rock Road betw@n Empire Rach Road ad Cason Crossing Road (Sermqto Couty Roadway Segmmt 28).

Mitigation M€3ure 3A.1i4o: Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on the White Rock Road/Caruo! Crossing Road Intersection (El Domdo County 1). To ensure that the White Rock Road/Carcn Crossing Road intqsection operates at m rcceptable LOS, the 6tboud right tum lee must be converted into a sepaate free right tum lae, or double right.

Improvements to this interrection must be implemented by El Dorado County. The applirot shall pay its proportionate shile of funding of improvflflts to the agocy responsible for improvements, based on a progrm established by that agency to reduce the imprcts to the White Rock Road/Cason Crcssing Road Intssection (El Dorado County l).

Mitigation Measure 3A.1$4p: Participat€ itr Fair Shrre Funding oflmprovements to Reduce Impacts on the Heel Avenue/U.S. 50 Westbourd Ramps Intcrsection (Caltrans Int€rsection 1). To ensue that the Hrel Avenue./U.S. 50 westbound rmps intersection operates at m @eptable LOS, the westbound approrch must be roonfigured to consist of one dedicated left tum lae, one shaed left- through lae ad thre dedicated right-tm lees. Improvments to this intersrction must be implemented by Caltms ild Semento County. The appli@t shall pay its proportionate shre of funding of improvemmts to the agmcy responsible for improvements, based on a progrm established by that agency to redu@ the impacts to the Hrcl Avenue{J.S. 50 Westbound Rmps Interseation (Caltrms Intqsection l)
Mitigatio! M€sure 3A.15-4q: Participate in Fair Share Funding oflmprovements to Reduce Impacts on Eastbound US 50 bctw€en Zinfandel Drive and Sunrise Boulevard (Freway S€gmelt l). To ensure that Estbound US 50 operates at a eeptable LOS between Zinfadel Drive md Surise Boulevad, m additional mtbound loe ould be constructed. This improvement is not consistqt with tbe Concept Facility in Caltrms State Route 50 Coridor System Meagement Ple; therefore, it is not likely to be implemented by Caltras by 2030.

Construction of the Capitol South Edt Connector, including widening White Rock Road ed Grilt Line Road to six laes with limited access, @uld divert some traffic from U.S. 50 ad patially mitigate the proj@t's impact. The applicat shall pay its proportionate shde of funding ofimprovments to the agqcy responsible for improvements, bded on a progrm established by that agency to reduce the impacts to Eastbound U.S. 50 betrvem Zinfmdel Drive md Sunrise Boulevud (Freway Segment l).

Mitigation Masure 3A.1t4r: Participate in Fair Share Futrding oflmprovementr to Reduce Impacts on Eastbound US 50 betwetr Rancho Cordova Parkway and Ilzel Avenue (Frway Segm€nt 3). To msure that Edtboud US 50 operates at m eceptable LOS betwen Racho Cordova Pakway ad Hzel Avenug a additional stbound lee @uld be consaucted. This improvemmt is not consistent with the Concept Facility in Caltrms State Route 50 Coridor Systm Meagment Plm; therefore, it is not likely to be implemented by Caltr@s by 2030.

Construction of the Capitol South East Connector, including widening White Rock Road md Grat Line Road to six laes with limited rccess, ould divert rcme traffic off of U.S. 50 ed partiatly mitigate the proj@t's impact. The applicat shall pay its propodionate shae of funding ofimprovements to the agmcy responsible for improvements, basd on a program established by that agncy to reduce the impacts to Eastbound U.S. 50 betwq Rilcho Cordova Pakway ad llazel Avenue (Fremy Segnmt 3).

Mitigation Mqsure 3.4-1s.&: Prrticipste in Fair Shre Funding of Improvemetrts to Reduce Impacts on Eastbound US 50 between Folsom Boulevard and Prsirie City Road (Freway Segment 5). To ensre that Eatbound US 50 operates at 4 rc@ptable LOS betwefl Folsom Boulevad ad Pmirie City Road, the emtbound auxiliary lae should be onverted to a mixed flow lee that extends to ed drops at &e Oak Avmue Pakway off rmp (se mitigation mruure 3A.15-4t). Improvments to this freeway segmflt must be implemented by Caltras. This improvment is not consistent with the Concept Frcility in Caltres State Route 50 Coddor System Maagment Pla; therefore, it is not likely to be implmented by Caltras by 2030.

Construction of the Capitol South Erut Connector, including wid@ing White Rock Road ad Grat Line Road to six laes with limited Folsom South of U.S. Highway 50 Specifc Plan
Clty of Folsom 63
AECOM
Mitigaton Monitoring and Reporling Program

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Table I
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan for the Folsom South of U.S. Highway 50 Specific Plan Project Dated Signature for
Verifi cation of ComplianceEnforcement
City of Folsm Public Works
Depatment
City of Folrcm Public Works
Depadment.

City of Folsom Public Works
Department.

City of Folsom Public Works
Department.

City of Folsom Public Works
Department.
lmplenentation
City ofFolsom Public
Works Departmqt
City ofFolsom Public
Works Deptrhnent.

City of Folmm Public
Works D€partment.

City ofFolsom Public
Works Deparhnent.

City ofFolsom Public
Works Depdtrnent.

Tining
improvemmt should be
built.

Before prcject build out.

A phcing aalysis
should be pofomed
pdor to @proval ofthe
first subdivision map to
detmine duing which
pro1ot phrc the
improvment should be
built.

Before prcject build out.

A phaing malysis
should be perfomed
prior to approval of the
first subdivision map to
detemine during which
project ph6e the
improvemot should be
built
Before prcject build out.

A phruing aalysis
should be perfomed
prior to approval ofthe
first subdivision map to
detemine during which
project ph6e the
improvement should be
built.

Beforc prqect build out.

A phaing malysis
should be performed
Fior to approval ofthe
first subdivision map to
detemine during which
prcjmt phre the
improvment should be
built.

Before prcject build out.

A phruing aa.lysis
should be performed
prior to approval ofthe
first subdivision map to
detemine during which
project phse the
improvement should be
built.
ilitigation ileabure
rccess, ould divert some traffic off of U.S. 50 md partially mitigate the project's impet.

The applicat shall pay its proportionate shae of funding of improvments, 6 may be detmined by a nexus study or other appropriate ad reliable mechaism paid for by applicat, to reduce the impacts to Eatbound U.S. 50 between Folsom Boulevad ad Pnirie City Road (Freeway Segment 5).

Mitigalion Mqsure 3A.15-4e Participate in Fair Share Futrding oflmprovements to Reduce Impacts on Eastbound US 50 betw€en Prairi€ City Road and Oak Avenue Parkway (Freway Segment 6). To 6sure that Eastbound US 50 operates at e @eptable l,OS baween Prairie City Road ad Oak Avenue Pakway, the northbound Pairie City Road slip on rmp should merge with the etbound auxiliary lae that extends to ad drops at the Oak Avmue Pakway offrmp (see Mitigation Memures 3A.15-4u, v ad w), ad the wuthbound Prairie City Road flyover on rmp should be braided ovq the Oak Avenue Pakway offrmp ad start e eKtqded full axiliary lme to the E6t Bidwell Str@t - Scott Road offrmp. Improvements to this freerey segment must be implemmted by Caltrms. The applicmt shall pay its proportionate shae offunding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or oths appropriate ad reliable mechaim paid for by applicat, to redue the impacts to Edtbound U.S. 50 between Prairie City Road ed Oak Avenue Pakway (FreMy Segment 6).

Mitigation M@sur€ 3A.15-4u: Participate in Fair Share Funding oflmprovements to Reduce Impacts otr th€ U.S. 50 Eastbound / Prairie City Road Slip Rsmp Merge (Freway Merge 6). To ensure that Edtbound US 50 operates at a rcceptable LOS, the northbomd Prairie City Road slip on rmp should start the eotbound auxiliary lme that extends to md drops at the Oak Avmue Pakway of rmp (see mitigation mruure 3A.15-4u, w md x), ad the rcuthbound Prairie City Road flyovq on rmp should be bmided ovs the Oak Avque Pakway offrmp md start @ extended full auiliary lae to the E6t Bidwell Street - Scott Road offrmp. Improvments to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrms. The applicat shall pay its proportionate shae of funding of improvments, 6 may be detemined by a nexus study or other appropriate md reliable mechaism paid for by applicat, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Eatbound / Prairie City Road slip mp merge (Freeway Merge 6).

Mitigation Mqsure 3.4"15-4v: Participate in Fair Share Funding oflmprovements to R€duce Impscb on th€ U.S. 50 Eastbound / Prairie City Road Flyover On Ramp to Oak Avenue Parkway OfTRamp Wuve (Freeway Weave 7). To 6sue that Eastbowd US 50 operates at m eceptable LOS, the northbound Pairie City Road slip on rmp should start the edtbound auxiliay lme that extends to md drops at the Oak Avmue Pakway off rmp (se mitigation mecure 3A..15-4u, v md x), ad the southbound Prairie City Road flyover on rmp should be braided ovq the Oak Avque Pakway off rmp ad start a extmded full axiliary lae to the E6t Bidwell Stre€t - S@tt Road offrmp. Improvements to this freway segment must be implmented by Caltras. The applicmt shall pay its proportionate shae of funding of improvments, 6 may be detemined by a nexus study or othu appropriate ad reliable mrchmism paid for by applicmt, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Eastbound / Prairie City Road Flyover On Rmp to Oak Avenue Pakmy O{iRmp Weave (Freeway Weve 7).

Mitigation Mesure 3A.15-4w: Participate in Fair Share Funding oflmprovements to Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Eastbound / Oak Avetru€ Parkway Loop R.mp Merg€ (Freeway Merge 8). To ensure that E6tbound US 50 opqates at a rcceptable LOS, the rcuthbound Oak Avenue Pakway lop on rmp should merge with the ectbound auxiliary lae that starts at the southbound Pmirie City Road bmided flyover on rmp md ends at the E6t Bidwell Street - Scott Road off rmp (see mitigation meoure 3A.154u, v ad w). Improvements to this freway segment must be implemented by Caltras. The applicat shall pay its proportionate shae of funding of improv@ents, as may be detemined by a nexus study or other appropriate ad reliable mchaism paid for by applicmt, to .educe the impacts to U.S. 50 Eastbound / Oak Avmue Pakway Loop Rmp Merge (Freeway Merge 8).

Mitigation Mssur€ 3A-15-4x: Participate in Fair Share Fuading of Improvements to Reduc€ Impacts on U.S. 50 Wstbound / Empire Ratrch Road Loop Ramp Merge (Fr@way Merge 27). To qsure that Westbound US 50 operates at a @ceptable LOS, the northbound Empire Rach Road loop on rmp should start the westbomd uiliary lae that ends at the East Bidwell Street - Scott Road off rmp. The slip on rmp from southbound Empire Rach Road slip mp would mage into this extended auxiliily lae. Improvements to this freway segment must be implemented by Caltras. The applicmt shall pay its proportionate shae of funding of improvemmts, as may be detemined by a nexus study or other appropriate md reliable mechmism paid for by appli@t, to r€duce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Westbound / Empire Rach Road loop rmp merge (Freway Merge 27).

AECOM
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Folsom South of U.S. Highway 50 Specific Plan
City of Folsom64

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Table I
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan for the Folsom South of U.S. Highway 50 Specific Plan Prcject Dated Signaturc for
Verifi cation of ComplianceEnforcemenl
City of Folsom Public Works
Depiltment md Srcrmflto
County Depdhnqt of
Trasportation.

1. For structwal improvements
that would be located within
the City of Folsom: City of
Folsom Neighborhood
Servics Department ild
City of Folsom Commwity
Development Depdtment.

2. For structural improvemqts
that would be loeted within
unincorporated S@lmmto
County; Saqmmto Couty
Planing ad Community
Development Department.

3. For struatual improvments
that would be located within
the City of Rmcho
Cordova: City ofRmcho
Cordova Plming
Department.
l. For structual improvements
that would be located within
the City of Folsom: City of
Folsom Neighborhood
Services Departm@t ad
City of Folsom Commwity
Development Depatment.

2. For structural improvements
that would be loeted within
unincorporated Srcmento
Couty: Sadmento Couty
Planing ad Community
Development Deparlment.

3. For structura.l improvemqts
that would be located within
the City of Racho
Cordova: City ofRacho
Cordova Planing
Department.
lmplementation
Clty of Folsm Public
Works Departmqt ad
S&mento County
Department of
Trasportntion.

City of Folrcm Utilities
Departmmt
City of Folsom Utilities
Department
Timing
Before project build out.

A phcing aalysis
should be perfomed
prior to approval ofthe
first subdivision map to
detemine during which
prcj@t phde the
improvment should be
built.

Prior to ad duing
construction of all Off-
site Water Frcilities
Prior to md duing
construction of all Off-
site Water Facilities
titigation lleasure
Mitigation Msure 3.d15-4y: Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Raduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Wetbound / Prairie City Road Loop Rsmp Merge (Freway Merge 35). To ensure that Westbound US 50 operates at m ec€ptable LOS, the northbound Prairie City Road loop on mp strould start the westbound auxiliary lae lhat continues beyond the Folsom Boulevad offrmp.

The slip on rmp lrom southbound Prairie City Road slip rmp would merge into this extended auiliary lae. Improvemqts to this freway Fgment must be implemoted by Caltras. The applicat shall pay its proportionate shae of funding of improvements, c may be detemined by a nexus study or other appropriate ild reliable mrchaism paid for by applicat, to redu€ the impacts to the U.S. 50 Westbound / Prairie City Road Lrop Rmp Muge (Freway Moge 35).

Mitigation Measure 3B.15-1a: Prepare Traffic Control Plan. Prior to @nstruction, the City shall prcptre a Traffic Control Plm for roadways md interwctions affected by Off-site Water Feilities-related @nstruction. The Traffic Cotrtrol Pla shall designate haul routes ad comply with requiremmts in the encroehment pmits issued by the City of Racho Cordova, Sacrflento County, ild Caltrds. The Traftic Control Pld to be prepred by the @nstructiotr contractor(s) shall, at minimum, include the following masures:
> Maintaining the mqimum mout of travel lae caprcity during non-onstruction poiods, possible, md advmced notice to drivs through the provision ofconstructron signage.
> Maintaining altmate one-way traffic flow p6t the lay dom aa ad site rccess wha fruible. > Healy trucks ad other construction trmsport vehicles shall avoid the busiest ommute hours (7 am. to 8 a.m. ad 5 p.m. to 6 p.m. on weekdays).
> The City shall provide a minimum 72-hour advece noti@ of a@ess restrictions for residots, businesses, md local @ergency rsponre agmcies. This shall include the idqtification of altmalive routes ad detours to dable for the avoidae of the imediate construction nne.
> The City, in @operation with its rcntrrcto(s), shall provide a phone numbq ad community contact for inquiries about the shedule of the Off-site Water Frcilities throughout the construction poiod. This infomation will be posted in a local newspaper, via the City's web site, or at City l{all ad will be updated on a monthly bmis. > To the extent practical depending the alignment ofthe relected Off-site Watq Facility Altemative, the City shall maimize oppodunities for coordinated construction ild installation of the conveyace pipeline with other plmed roadway imprcvement prcjects.

Mitigation Measure 3B.ltlb: Assas Preoff-site Water Faciliiia Roadway Conditions.

Prior to @nstluction, the City's construction contractor(s) shall be responsible for msessing cutrent road conditions for OFsite Watq Facilities-related haul routes including the local rccess roads ad develop post @nstruction road restoration requirements. As part ofthe mcroehment pemitting process, m agrmqt shall be entqed into with applicable jurisdictions prior to mnstruction that details post construction road restoration requirments. Staffwith the City of Racho Cordova ad S&rmmto County shall review the post @nstruction restoration stadrds for erch ofthe affected roadways. The City shall perfom roadway repairs or rehabilitation s necessary such that post construction requirem@ts ae mel

38.15 TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION . WATER
Folsom South ofU.S. Highv{ay 50 Specifc Plan
City of Folsom 65
AECOM
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Pmgram

12/10/2024 Item No.19.
3A.16 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS - LAND

38.16 UT|LINES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS - WATER

38.17 GROUNDWATER - WATER
AECOM
Mitigalion Monitoring and Reporting Program
Table I
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan for the Folsom South of U,S. Highway 50 Specific Plan Project Dated Signature tor
verifi cation of ComplianceEnlorcement
City of Folsom Commuity
Development Department ad
City of Folsom Public Wo*s
Department.

City of Folsom Community
Development Depdtment md
City of Folsm Public Works
Department.

City of Folsom Community
Dwelopment Department ad
City of Folsom Public Works
Department.

City of Folsom Community
Dfl elopment Department md
City of Folsom Public Works
Dep{tment.

City of Folsom Utilities
Department
City of Folsom Utilities
Depaftment
L Califomia Depdhnent of
Fish ad Gme or Regional
Water Quality Control
Boad

2. City of Folsom Community
Development Depdtment.
lmplementation
The proj@t applicet(s)
ofall project phces.

The prcject applicmt(s)
ofall prcject phoes.

The prqject applicilt(s)
ofall project phases..

The project applicmt(s)
of all proj@t ph6es.

City of Folsom Utilities
Depiltment
City of Folsom Utilities
Department
City of Folsom Utilities
Depdtment
Timing
Before approval offinal
maps ad issuace of
building pmits for ay
prcject phses.

Before approva.l of fi nal
maps md issumce of
building pmits for oy
proj@t phdes.

Before approval offinal
maps od issuace of
building pmits for my
project phde
Before approval offinal
maps ad issumce of
building pmits for my
prcject phoes involving
the El Dorado Hills
WWTP.

Prior to construction of
all Off-site watq
Frcilities
Pdor to construction of
all Off-site Water
Feilities
Prior to ad duing
@nstruction
llitigation teasurc
Mitigation Mesure 3A.1G1: Submit Proof of Adequete On- and OIf-Site Wastwater Conv€yetrce Facilitis end Implem€nt Otr- &nd Ofi-Site Infrsstructure Seryice Syst@s or Ensure That Adequale Financing Is Scured. Before the approval of the final rop ad issuae of building pmits for all project phoeg the projrct appli@t(s) of all projea phoes shall submit proof to the City of Folsm that m adequale wastewder @nveyace systm eitho ho ben @nstructed or is ensued through paymqt of $e City's feilitiG augmstation f@ 6 described undq the Folrcm Municipal Code Title 3, Chaptu 3 .40, "Frcilities Augmfltation Fee - Folrcm South Are Facilities Pla," or other sueties to the City's satisfaction. Both on-site retewater onveyae infirutructue dd off-site for@ main sufiicient to provide adequate sryi@ to the prqot shall be in plae for the mount of developmmt idmtified in the tentative map before approwl of the final map md iswce of building pmits for all prq@t phass, or their fimcing shall be ensured to the satisfadion of the Crty.

Mitigation Measure 3A.16-3: Demonstrate Adequate SRWTP Wastewater Trqtmenl Cspacity, The project applimt(s) of all project phoes shall dmonstrate adequate capeity at the SRWTP for new wdteMter flows generated by the project. This shall involve prepaing a tentative map-level study md paying connection md eprcity fees c identified by SRCSD. Approval of the final map ad issuae of building pemits for all project ph6es shall not be greted until the City voifies adequate SRWTP capacity is available for the mount of dwelopment idotified in the tfltative map.

Miligatiotr Mssure 3A.16-4: Submit Proof of Adequate EID Otf-Site Wast€water Conveyance Facilities rnd Implement EID OIf-Site Infrastructure Seryice Systems or Ensure That Adequate Financing Is Scured. Before the approval ofthe final map ad issuace of building permits for all prcject phoes, rhe project applimt(s) of all prcjrct phrcs shall obtain proof from EID that il adequate wastewater @nveymce system either ha been mnstructed or is ensured through the use ofbonds or othq sureties. The p.oj6t applicmts of all prcject phass shall submit this proofto the City ofFolrcm. EID off-site wdtewater conveymce infrdtructure sufficient to provide adequate reryice to proJect shall be in pl@ for the mount of development identified in the tentative map before approval of the final map od issuace of building pemits for all prqect ph6es, md before issuace of occupmcy pemits, or their finacing sha.ll be ensured to the satisfaction of the City.

Mitigstiotr M@sure 3A.16-5: Demonstrate Adequate El Dorado llills Wastwater Trstment Plant Capacity. The project applimt(s) of all project phces shall demonstrate adequate @prcity at the El Dorado Hills WWTP for ns wotwater flows generated by pro;ect development. This shall involve prepring at@talive map-level study ad paying connorion ad caprcity fes o identified by EID.

Approval of the final map md issuace of building pemits for all prcjct phrues shall not be grated until the City verifia adequate El Dorado Hills WWTP eprcity is available for the mount of development identified in the tmtative map.

Mitigation M€sure 38.16-3a: Minimize Utility Conflicts by Implementing an Underground Senices Alert. Undqground utilities md setuice @nnections shall be identified prior to commencing ay ex€vation work through the implementation ofm Underground Services Alerf (USA). The exact utility locations will be detmined by hed-excavated test pits dug at locations detemined md approved by the construction maags (alm refened to c "pot-holing"). Tempordy disruption of servie may be required to allow for construction. No servie on such lines would be disrupted until prior approval is received from the construction meager ed the seruice provider.

Mitigatiotr Measure 38.16-3b: Coordinale with Utility Providers and Implement Appropriate Installation Methods to Minimize Potential Utility Serice Disruptions. Prior to installation, the City shall oonsult with SCWA, SRCSD, CSD-I, ad PG&E to detemine proper installation mahods ad final design criteria to minimize the potential for disruptions to existing ad plmned utilities.

Mitigstion Mesure 38.17-1a: Implement Conslructiotr Dewetering Best Management Practices.

Dudng construction at site locations containing high groundwater, ifgroundwater from dewatqitrg activities canot be contained within the construction a€ (e.g. pipeline corridor, WTP), it shall be pumped to a althorized onsite led ae4 existing detention facilities, or Baker tanks or equivalent with suffrcient caprcity to @ntrol the volume of groundwatq. T@ks shall be equipped with either a gel oagulat, a filter systm, or other @ntainmqt to remove sedimmt. The Off-site Water Feilities Stomwater Pollution Prevention Pla (SWPPP) shall include BMPS, 6 appropriatg to retain, treat, ed dispose ofgroundwater from dewatering activities. Mecures shall include, but not limited to, the 66 Folsom Soufi of U.S. Highway 50 Specifc Plan
City of Folsom

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Table'l
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan for the Folsom South of U.S, Highway 50 Specific Plan Project Dated Signatu]e for
verifi cation ol ComplianceEnforcement

3. Semento County
Pldning Depiltment or
City of Racho Cordova
Planiog Department for
improvements within their
rspective jurisdictions.
l Califomia Depatment of
Fish ad Gme or Regional
Water Quality Control
Bord

2. City of Folsom Community
Development Departmmt.

3. S&lmento County
Planing Depiltmmt or
City of Racho Cordova
Planing Depdhnent for
improvemmts within their
respative jurisdictions.

City of Folsom Community
Development Department ad
City of Folsom Public Wo*s
Department.

City of Folsom Community
Development Department dd
City of Folsm Public Works
Departm€nt.

City of Folsom Community
Development Departmqt ad
City ofFolsom Public Works
Department.
lmplementation
City of Folsom Utilities
Depatment
The prcject applicmt(s)
ofall project phoes.

The project applicat(s)
for my paticula
discretionary
developmmt
application.

The prcject applicilt(s)
for my particulil
discretionary
developmqt
applicaion.

Timing
Prior to ad duing
@nstruction
Before approval offina1
maps od issumce of
building pqmits for ay
project phses.

Before approval offinal
maps ad issuace of
building pmits for my
prcj@t ph6es.

Before approval offiral
maps md issuae of
building pmits for my
prcject phases.
titigation teasure
following:
> temporaily retain pumped groundwatq, 6 appropdate, to reduce turbidity ad concenfations of suspended sediments before dischage to surfrce watemayq
> onvey pumped groundwater to a suitable lad disposal ra capable of pacolating flows; ad/or > incorporate other applieble meruures from the Caltras Storm Water Quality Hadbook, S@tion 7: Dewatering Op@tions (2004).

Mitigation Masur€ 38.17-1b: Implement a Dwatering Discharge Motritoring Prcgram. A groundwater dischdge monitoring progrm shall be implemated to ensure that r@eiving wter quality does not exceed levels tiat would imprct aqlatic rmources md agricultural use. lf monitoring revels that water quality would impact thew beneficial ures, dirchages to surface waleNays shall be redued or diluted to acceptable levels, or teminated. If dischages ae redu@d or tminated, groundwato shall be disposed through lad application.

Groundwater mllected during dwatoing shall be tested for contamination prior to disposal md comply with Central Valley RWQCB requirements.

Miligation M@sure 3,4..18-l: Submit Proof of Surfrce W&ter Supply Availability. a. Priortoapprovalofmysma.ll-lottentativesubdivisionmapsubjeattoGovemmmtCodeSection664T3.T(SB22l),theCityshall comply with that statute. Prior to approval of my small-lot totative subdivision map lor a proposed residential prcject not subject to that statute, the City need not comply with Setion 66473.7, ot fomally consult with ay public water systm that would provide wats to the affected ae4 nevertheless, the City shall make a factual showing or impose conditions simila to thore required by S@tion 66473.7 to msure a adequate water supply for developmot authorized by the map. b. Priortorecordationofeachfina.lsubdivisionmap,orpriortoCityapprovalofmysimildprqect-specificdiscretionaryapprovalor entitlement required for nonresidential uses, the prcject applicat(s) of that project ph6e or activity sha.ll demonstrate the availability of a reliable ad sufhcient water supply from a public wats system for the mount of dwelopment that would be authorized by the final subdivision map or prq@t-sp@ific discretionary noruesidential approval or otidement. Such a d@onstration shall rcnsist of infomation showing that both existing soures ae available or needed supplies ad improvements will be in plee prior to occupmcy.

Mitigation Masure 3A.1&2a: Subnit Prcof of Adequate Otf-Site Water Conv€yance Facilities and Implement Olf-Site Infrastruclure Seryice System or Ensure That Adequate Financing Is Scured.

Before the approval of the final subdivision map md issuae of building pmits for all project phrcs, the prcjct applicmt(s) of my particula disoetionay development application shall submit proofto the City ofFolsom that a adequate off-site water convEymce system eiths h6 been constructed or is osured or othq sureties to the City's satisfaction. The off-site waier conveyace infrdtructure sufficidt to provide adequate service to the project shall be in place for the mount ofdevelopment identified in the totative map before approval ofthe final subdivision map ad issuace of building pemits for all prcject phaes, or their finacing shall be ensured to the etisfaction of the City A certifi@te of occupmry shall not be issued for my building within the SPA until the water @nveyace infrutructure suffrcient to swe such building has ben constructed md is in plee.

Mitigation M€sure 3.4..18-2b: Demonstratc Adequate Off-Site Wster Tr€tment Cap.city (if the Off-Site Wat€r Tr@tment Phnt Option is Selected).

If m off-site Mter treatmflt plmt (WTP) altemative is slected (as opposed to the on-site WTP altemative), the prcject applica(s) for ay particula discretionary dwelopment application shall demonstrate adequate capacity at the off-site WTP. This shall involve prepaing a tentative map-level study md paying rcnnection ild caprcity f@s c detemined by the City. Approval of the final prq@t map shall not be glated mtil the City verifies adequate wats treatment capeity either is available or is certain to be available when needed for the mount of development idmtified in the tentative map before approval of the final map md isuae of building pemits for all project phes. A certificate ofoccupacy shall not be issued for ay building within the SPA until the watq treatment capacity sumcient to srye such 3A.18 WATER SUPPLY. LAND
Folsom Sou& of U.S. Highway 50 Specifc Plan
City of Folsom
AECOM
Mitigation Monitorjng and Reporling Program67

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Table 1
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan for the Folsom South of U.S, Highway 50 Specific Plan Poect Dated Signature for
Verifi cation ol ComplianceEnforcement
City of Folsom Community
Development Department.
lmplenentation
The prcjrct applicat(s)
ofthe Folrcm South of
U.S.50 Specific Pla
project.

Timing
Prior to approval offirst
tentative map or
discretiondy approval
within SPA that would
place sensitive receptors
along roadways that
quilry trucks would
redonably use to ecess
U.S. Highwy 50.
lritigation il€sure
building ha been onstructed and is in pl@.

Cumulalive Mitigation Mesure AIR-l-Land: Implement East Sacramento Regional Aggregate Mining Truck Managemcnt Platr or Other Measu16 to Reduce Exposure ofSensitive Rec€ptors to Operatiotral Emission! ofToric Air Contaminantr from Quarry Truck Traffic The City of Folsom is a participat in the development of m E6t Sermento Regional Aggregate Mining Truck Maagement Pla (TMP), a cooperative effofi led by the Couty of S@@ento, with the input of the Cit of Folsom, the Crty of Racho Cordova md other interested parties, including rgrresentatives ofquarry project applicmts. When the County Boad of Supewimrs approved entitlwents for the Teichert quary prcject in November 201 0, it also adopted conditions ofapproval ad a dwelopment agreement that requires Teichert's participation in, ad fair shae funding o{ a TMP to implement roadway capacity ad safety improvwents required to improve the compatibility of truck traffic from the qumies with the future urbe development in the Folsom Spoific Pla aea ad other jurisdictions that will be affected by quarry truck hafiic. The development agreement adopted by the County for the Teichert prcj@t imposes limits on the mounts of anual aggregate sales from Teichert's feility until a TMP is adopted. The City of Folrcm does not have dirot jurisdiction over the Teiche4 DeSilva Gates, or Walltom quarry prcject applicets as these projects ae located within the uninorporated portion ofthe County. The County, 6 the €ency with the primary authority over the qumies, has indieted that it intends to prepae il environmental malysis in acordae with CEQA prior to adoption of a TMP. The City's authority to control the rctivities of the quarry trucks includes restrictions or other etions, such c the approval md implementation of spoialized road improvements to ac@modate qudry truck traffic, that would be applicable within the City's jurisdictiona.l boundaies. For the foregoing r6ons, the City ofFolsm considers itself a "responsible agenry" (as that tem is defined at State CEQA Guidelines, CCR Section I 5381), in that it h6 sme discretionary power over rcme elements of a futurc TMP, if such TMP calls for imprcvements or olhq rctivities on roadways within the jurisdiction ofthe City. In a responsible agency role, the City would follow the process sprcified in the CEQA Guidelines for mnsideration ad approval ofthe ovironmental aalysis prepaed by the County for a TMP afto such documentation is prepded ed adopted by the County. (State CEQA Guidelines, CCR Section 15096.)
Bemuse no final project description for a TMP ha been developed as ofthe completion ofthis FEIR/IEIS, the City would have to speculate d to those portions of a TMP that might be propored for implmentation within its jurisdiction, or the impacts that could aise from the implementation of a-yet unertain rcmponents. Accordingly, fomulation of the pr@ise meas of mitigating the potmtial cumulalive air quality impacts pursuat to the TMP is not cmently fesible or practical. However, c the prefened, feasiblg md intended mitigation strategy to address the cumulative impacts ofqudry truck trafiic through the SPA, the City shall implement, or cause to be implemented thore portions of the TMP (o described above) that ae within its authority to control. In implmenting the TMP, the City sha.ll ensurc that the TMP or traffic meures imposed by the City within the SPA reduce the risk of cacer to smsitive .septors along routes within the SPA from toxic air contarninet emissions to no more thm 296 in one million (SMAQMD 2009. Mach. Re@mqded Protocol for Evaluating the Location of Sensitive Lad Ures Adjrent to Major Roadways, Vosion 2.2:7), or such different threshold of significace madated by SMAQMD or ARB at the timg if my. With this mitigation, the cumulative air quality impacts from truck toxic air contarninats would be less tha significat.

As a altemative (or in addition) to implementing the TMP within the SPA, the following measures rculd (md should) be voluntaily implemented by the qudry prcject applicmt(s) (Teichert, Desilva Gates, md Grmite [WalltoM]) to help msue exposure of sensitive receptors to TACs generated by quarry tuck trafiic to the 296-in-one-million threshold of significace idqtified above. The City encouages implementation of the following memures:
> The qurry prcject applicat(s) should meet with the City of Folsom to discuss mitigation strategies, implemmtation, ed @st. > A site-specific, projetJevel screming aalysis ad,/or Health Risk Assessment (HRA) should be onducted by the City of Folsom ad funded by the truck applim(s) for all proposed sensitive reeptors (e.g., residences, schools) in the SPA that would be located along the sides of roadway segments that de identified in Table 4-4 c being potentially significilt undq ey of the malyzed scmaios. Erch prq@t-level malysis shall be performed rccording to the standads set forth by SMAQMD for the purpose ofdisclosure to the public ad deision makers. The prcjectJevel aa.lysis shall rcount for the location of the receptors relative to the roadwy, their distace from the roadway, the prcjected future tmffic volume for the yw 2030 (including the proportion ofdiesel trucks), ad emission mtes representative ofthe vehicle fleet for the yw when the snsitive lmd uses would first bsome operational md/or ooupied. Ifthe incrmental incrw in cacer risk detmined by in the HRA exceeds 296 in one million (or a diffaent threshold of signifiroe reommoded by SMAQMD or ARB at the time, if ay), then proj rct design mitigation should be mployed, which may include the following:

CUMULATIVE - LAND
AECOM Folsom South ol U.S. HiglMay 50 Specifc Plan
City ofFolsomMitigaton Monitoring and Reporting Program

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Table 1
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan tor the Folsom South of U.S. Highway 50 Specific Plan Project Dated Signaturc for
Verilication ol ComplianceEnforemeni
City of Folsom Community
Development Departmqt.

I m plementation
The project applicmt(s)
of the Folrcm South of
U.S.50 Specific Plm
project.

Timing
Prior to approval offirst
tentative map or
discretionary approval
within SPA that would
place rensitive receptors
along roadways that
quary trucks would
r€sonably use to rccess
u.s.50.
llitigation ileasure
. Incr6e the setb@k distmce betwen the roadway ad affected r@eptor. If this mitigation mesure is detmined by the City of Folsom to be necessary, brcd on lhe results ofthe HRA, the quaiy truck applicat(s) should pay the Folsom South ofU.S. 50 Specific Pld project applicat(s) ad the City ofFolsom a f@ that shall serye 6 @mpenstion for lost development profit dd lost City ta revmues, all c detemined by the parties. Said mitigation fee shall be detemined in consultation with the qudry prcject applicat(s), the Folsom South of U.S. 50 Specific Pla prcjot applicut(s), md the City of Folsm. No quarry trucks shall be allowed to pos on ay roadway wgment immediately adjacmt to or within the SPA util said mitigation fees {e paid. . Implment tiered tre plmting of fine-needle spoies, such as redwood, along the nea side of the roadway segments ad, if fesible, along the roadwy 500 feet in both dir@tions of the initial pldting (e.9., 500 feet north ad rcuth of a roadmy that runs e6t-rest) to enhmce the dispe$ion ad filtration of mobile-source TACs asrcciated with the adjrcnt roadway. These tres should be plated at a density such that a solid visual buffer is rchieved aftq the tr€s rqch maturity, which breaks the line of sight baween U.S. 50 ad the proposed homes. These trees should be plmted before o@upation of my affected sensitive lad uses. This meoure en@urages the plating of these tres in advece of the @nsauction of potentially affected re@ptors to allow the tr@s to be@me established ad progress towad maturity. The life ofthere trees should be maintained through the duration ofthe quarry prq@ts.

The plating cos! od ongoing maintenace ofthere trees should.be funded by the quarry prcject applicat(s). . To improve the indoor air quality at afected receptors, implement the following mecures before the occupacy ofthe affected residences md rchools:
. equip all affected residenes od school buildings developed in the SPA with High Efticiency Pilticle Anesting (HEPA) filter systms at all mechilical air intake points to the interior rooms; . use the heating, ventilation, md air conditioning (HVAC) systems to maintain all residential units under positive pressure at all times;
. locate air intake systems for HVAC as fa away from roadway air pollution sources m possible; md . develop ad implement a ongoing edu€tion md maintenmce pla about the filtration systems ssciated with tryAC for residences ad schools.

To the extent this indoor air quality mitigation would not a.lready be implemented a part ofthe Folsom South ofU.S. 50 Specific Plm project development, this mitigation should be paid for by the qudry prcject applicat(s) before my quilry trucks de allowed to pass on my roadway that is within 400 feet ofay residence or school within the SPA.

Cunulative Mitigation Measure NOISE-I-Land: Implement East Sacramento R€gional Aggregate Mining Truck Manag€ment Plan or Other Measures to Reduce Exposure ofSensitive Receptors to Operational Noise from Quarry Trock Tmllic.

The City of Folsom is a participat in the development of a E6t Srcrmento Regional Aggregate Mining Truck Maagement Plm (TMP), a cooperative effort led by the County of Srcrmmto, with the input of the City of Folsom, the City of Rmcho Cordova ad other interested parties, including reprcsfltatives ofqudry project applicats. Whm the County Botrd of Supenircn approved entitlements for the Teichert quarry prcjet in November 2010, it also adopted conditions of approval ad a development agr@mqt that requires Teichert's paticipation in, md fair shae funding of, a TMP to implement roadway capeity md sfety improvmmts required to improve the compatibility of t uck trafiic fiom the quilies with the future ubil development itr the SPA md othrjurisdictions that will be aflected by qudry truck traffic. The development agrement adopted by the County for the Teichert prcject impoFs limits on the mounts of mnual aggregate ules from Teiche*'s frcility until a TMP is adopted. The City ofFolsm does not have direct jurisdiction over the Teichert, DeSilva Gates, or Walltow qudry projst applicmts * these projots re located within the unincorporaled portion ofthe County. The County, 6 the agency with the primary authority over the quuies, hc indicated that it intflds to prcpae a ovironmental malysis in &ordace with CEQA prior to adoption ofa TMP. The City's authority to onaol the rctivities ofthe quarry trucks includes restrictions or other etions, such as the approval ad implematation of spaialired road improvements to accommodate qudry truck taIfic, that would be applicable within the City's juisdictional boundaies. For the foregoing resons, the City of Folsom considers itself a "responsible agency" (as that tm is defined at Stale CEQA Guidelines, CCR Setion 15381), in that it has some discretionary powq over some elements ofa future TMP, if such TMP calls for improvemmts or other @tivities on roadways within thejuisdiction ofthe City. In a responsible agency role, the City would follow the process specified in the CEQA Guidelines for consideration md approval ofthe environmmtal aalysis prepaed by the County for a TMP after such docummtation is preptred ad adopted by the County. (State CEQA Guidelines, CCR Section 15096.) Because no final prcject descdption for a TMP h6 beo developed as ofthe completion ofthis FEIR/FEIS, the City would have to speculate CUMULATIVE. NOISE
Folsom South of U.S. Highway 50 Specifc Plan
City of Folsom AO
AECOM
Mfigation Monitoring and Reporting Program

12/10/2024 Item No.19.

Table 1
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan for the Folsom South of U.S. Highway 50 Specific Plan Prciect Dated Signaturc for
verilication of ComplianceEnforcementlmplementationTimingilitigation tleasue as to those portions ofa TMP that might be propowd for implementation within itsjurisdiction, or the imprcts that could rise from the ofo- yet uncertain components. A@ordingly, fomulation of the precise m@s of mitigating the potential cmulative noise imprcts pursumt to the TMP is not curently feasible or practical. However, ro the prefmed, fe6ible, ad intended mitigation strategy to address the cumulative impacts of quarry truck traffic thrcugh the SPA, the City shall implmen! o. cause to be implemented those portions of the TMP (6 described above) that ae within its authority to control. In implementing the TMP, the City shall ensure thal the TMP or traffic mruures imposed by the City within the SPA reduce t]le trafiic noiF exposue to wnsitive receptors along routes within the SPA so 6 to ensure thal sdsitive receptors ae not expowd to interior noise levels in excas of 45 dBA, or increms in interior noire levels of 3 dBA or morg whichryq is more restrictive. With this mitigation, the cumulative noise imprcts &om truck trafiic would be less tha significmt.

As m altemative (or in addition) to implem@ting the TMP within the SPA, the following meoures rculd (ad should) be voluntrily implemoted by the quilry project applicat(s) (Teiched, DeSilva Gates, ad Grdite [Walltom]) to help ensurc interior nois lflels for sensitive receptors to noire gmerated by quilry truck traffic would not exceed 45 dBA or increare of3 dBA over existing onditions, as identified above. The City ocourages implemmtation of the following meisues:
> The quarry prcject applicat(s) should meet wi& the City ofFolsom to discuss mitigation strategies, implementation, ad cost. > A site-specifig prcjectJevel screening aalysis should be mnducted by the CiE of Folrcm ad funded by the quary truck applicat(s) for all proposed sensitive rceptors (e.g., residmces, whools) in the SPA that would be lo€ted along the sides ofroadway segments that ae identified in Table 4-8 as being potentially significmt under my of the aalyzed *ouios. The aalysis should be conducted using m approved thre dimensional traffic noise modeling progrm (i.e., TNM or SoundPlm). Erch prcjecGlevel aalysis should be perfomed rccording to the stmddds set forth by the City of Folsom for the purpose of disclosure to the public md daision makers. The prcjectJevel aalysis should rccount for the location ofthe receptors rclative to the roadway, their distme from the roadway, md the prqected future treIlic volume for the yea 2030 (including the percentage ofh@ry trucks). Ifthe incremental increre in traffic noise levels ae detemined to ex@ed the threshold of significace roommended by the City of Folsom, then design mitigation should be employed, which may include the following:
> Model the benefits of soudwalls (bom/wall combination) along the quary truck haling roadwys ad affeated receptors not to exceed a total height of eight feet (two-foot bem md six-foot concrete mason.wall). lf this mitigation mruure is detemined by the City of Folsom to be inadequate, additional three dimensional traffic noise modeling should be conducted with the inclusion ofrubberized opha.lt at the expense of the qudry truck applicilt(s). No qudry trucks should be allowed to pcs on ay roadway segment immediately adjacent to or within the SPA util said mitigation has ben agred upon by the City ofFolsom md fees for construction of sid mitigation de paid by the quary truck applicat(s).
> Implemot the installation of rubberized aphalt (quiet pavment) on rcadway segments adjeent to sensitive recepto6 that ctrry quarry trucks if rcundwalls do not prcvide adequate reduction offaffic noise lqels. The inclusion ofrubboized ophalt would provide a additional 3 to 5 dB oftra.fiic noise reduction. The cost ofonstruction using rubberized asphalt should be bome by the quary truck applicat(s). Said mitigation fee should be determined in consultation with the qutrry prqect applicilt(s), the Folsom South ofU.W. 50 Specific PIa project applicmt(s), ad the City of Folsom. No quarry trucks should be allowed to pos on my rcadway segment immediately adjrcent to or within the SPA until said mitigation fees {e paid. > To improve the indoor noise levels at affected receptors, implement the following meures before the occupecy of the a.ffected residences ad rchools:
. Conduct an interior noise mlysis once detailed construction plans ofresidences adjacent to affected roadways are available to detemine the required window package at second and third floor re@ptors to achieve the interior noise level standard of45 dB Ldn without quarry trucks.
. Determine the interior quarry truck traffic noise level inseases at second and third floor receptors adjacent to affected roadways compared to no quarry nuck conditions. Window package upgades are expected to be necessary due to the traffic noise level increases caused by quarry trucks along affected roadways. Qutrry huck applicant(s) should pay for the cost ofwindow package upgrades (incrased sound trasmission class rated windows) required to achieve dre interior noise level standard of45 dB Lda with the inclusion ofquarry fuck faffic.

To the €xtent this noise mitigation would not already be implmented as part of the Folsom South of U.W. 50 Specific Plan project development, this mitigation should be paid for by the quarry project applicant(s) before any quarry trucks are allowed to pass on any roadway that is within 400 feet ofany residence or school within the SPA.

AECOM Folsom South of U.S. HiglMay 50 Specifc Plan
City of FolsomMitigaton Monitoring and Reporting Program 70

12/10/2024 Item No.19.
i,rsi.i;
' ,.t j
i,.,t!r('itra I
i l r\'l
Folsom City Council
Staff Re rt
REC oN/ COIINCIL CTION
The Finance Department recommends that the City Council receive and file the City of Folsom, the Folsom Redevelopment Successor Agency, the Folsom Public Financing Authority, the Folsom Ranch Financing Authority, and the South of 50 Parking Authority monthly Investment Reports for the month of September 2024.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
Under the Charter of the City of Folsom and the authority granted by the City Council, the Finance Director is responsible for investing the unexpended cash of the City Treasury. The primary objectives of the City's investment policy are to maintain the safety of investment principal, provide liquidity to meet the short and long-term cash flow needs of the City, and earn a market-average yield on investments. The City's portfolio is managed in a manner responsive to the public trust and is consistent with state and local laws and the City's investment policy. The Finance Department hereby submits the investment reports for the City of Folsom, the Folsom Redevelopment Successor Agency, the Folsom Public Financing Authority, the Folsom Ranch Financing Authority, and the South of 50 Parking Authority for the month of September 2024.

MEETING DATE: r21r012024
AGENDA SECTION: Joint Meeting Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Receive and File the City of Folsom, the Folsom Redevelopment Successor Agency, the Folsom Public Financing Authority, the Folsom Ranch Financing Authority, and the South of 50 Parking Authority Monthly Investment Reports for the Month of
September 2024
F'ROM: Finance Department
1

12/10/2024 Item No.20.

POLICY i RULE

1. Section 3.30.010(a) of the Folsom Municipal Code states "the term 'city' shall encompass the city of Folsom, the Folsom community redevelopment qgency, and all other agencies and instrumentalities of the city under either the direct or indirect control of the city council, and this chapter regulates the investment of all moneys of those agencies."

2. Section 3.30.030(0 of the Folsom Municipal Code states that "the city's chief investment officer shall each month submit an investment report to the city council, which report shall include all required elements as prescribed by California Government code section 53646."

3. California Government Code, Sections 53601 through 53659 sets forth the state law governing investments for municipal governments in California.

4. Section 3.30.020(9) of the Folsom Municipal Code states that "all city cash shall be consolidated into one general bank account as set out in this code and invested on a pooled concept basis. Interest earnings shall be allocated to all city funds and subfunds according to fund and subfund cash and investment balance on at least a quarterly basis."

ANALYSIS
Overview
The City has diversified investments in accordance with the City Investment Policy and Government Code. The City of Folsom's total cash and investments are invested on a pooled basis as required by the Folsom Municipal Code.

The Portfolio Summary of the City's current report includes a "Pooled Equity Section" identiffing the Redevelopment Successor Agency's (RDSA) and Folsom Public Financing Authority's (FPFA) portion of the investment pool. The RDSA and FPFA list these amounts under "Cash" in their respective sections. Currently, the Folsom Ranch Financing Authority (FRFA) has no funds invested in Pooled Equity.

City of Folsom
Total Cash and Investments
The following graph illustrates the City's monthly cash and investment balances for fiscal years2)2l through 2025. Monthly fluctuations in cash and investments are the result of typical receipt of revenues less expenditures for operations, debt service, and capital improvements.

As of September 30,2024, the City's cash and investments totaled $289,894,808; an increase of $38,012,025 (15%) from September 30, 2023.
2Page 484
12/10/2024 Item No.20.

JUI AUG sgp ocr NOV
Ctty of Folsom Total Cash and Investments
(Fiscal Year)
+202!22 +2022/23 '-*-2023/24
DEC
-202o/2I
*2024125
,AN Fag MAR MAY ,UNAPR3410
320
300
280
2@
c
Ezqo
220
200
180
160
1la
L20
The following chart shows the City's monthly cash and investment balances and percentage change for Fiscal Year 2024-25 alongwith the yearly dollar and percentage changes.

Total City Cash and Investments
Monthly
2024-25 Chanse 2023-24
Monthly
Change
Yearly $
Chanse
Yeady o/o
Change
Jul
Aug
Sep
$ 303,338,537
$ 292,274,877
$ 289,894,808
$ 257,726,288
$ 250,130,252
$ 251,882,783
8 45,612,249
$ 42,144,625
$ 38,012,025
-4%
-t%
-3%
l%
l8%
t7%
t5%
The City's projected cash needs for the next six months are sufficiently provided for by anticipated revenues and the liquidity of its cash and investments. In addition, in accordance with Section 3.30.020(c) of the Municipal Code, less than 50%o of the City's total cash is invested for a period longer than one year.
aJ Page 485
12/10/2024 Item No.20.

To Maturityas of September 30,2024
34 Yrs
4-5 Yrs
28,528,000
29,252,000 0 Days

28.3%
2-3 Yrs
41,721,OOO
L3,8%
1 Day
7,837,936
2,6%
48,327,000
t6.2%
184-365 Days
35,142,000
x1,8%
2-183 Days
23,213,000
72%
lnvcatmetrti llsted at ta@Volue
Investment Performance
The City's Portfolio Management Summary report for the month of September 2024 is presented in Attachment 1 to this report. Portfolio investment earnings (including pooled equity earnings for the RDSA and FPFA) for the three-month quarter ended September 30, 2024totaled$3,384,336. Thetotalrateofreturnoftheinvestmentportfolioforthesameperiod was 4.46Yo.

The following graph illustrates the total dollar amount and breakdown by investment category for September 30, 2023 and September 30,2024. This graph lists the investments by face value.
4 Page 486
12/10/2024 Item No.20.
s350,m0,0m
s3oo,00qo00
$250,000,000
s200,000.0m
s1so,000.om
s100,0ogoo0
ss0,000,000
I Municipal Bonds
t Corporate Bonds
r US Agencies & Treasuries
- Certificates of Deposit
I Commercial Paper
r LGIP
I Money Market
r iistr - ctreihng
September 30,
2023
S53,2os,ooo
s26,500,000
S80,1m,ooo
S17,484,000
s2oroP,ooo
542,39t,5OL
s6,749,ss9
51,428,727
December 31,
2023
s72,30s,0m
S26,s4s,om
$71,S00,000
s18,214p00
S2o,ooo,ooo
ss1,1ss,ss9
513y'98,032
S1.000,191
March 31.2024
s73l8s,ooo
525,s45,000
ssspm,om
S18,463,0m
srz,sm,ob
567,999,449
$20,412,389
S1,050,989
r LGIP
t corporate Bonds
S78,460,ooo
S32,088,0m
ss3poopm
s19,575p0O
S2s,ooo,ooo

58.6,593,547
S13,791,00G
Sr,oas,s+s
September 30,
2024
574,7$,Offi
s32,088,000
Sze,soo,om
s17,705,000
s7,s00,000
s5s,s98,247
522,372,6a
57,036,077
s-
lnvestments by Category - Last 5 Quarters
June 30, 2024
r cash - Checking
r Certificates of Deposit
! Money Market
r US Agencies & Treasuries
I Commercial Paper
r Municipal Bonds
lnvestments llsted at FaceValue
A detailed listing of the portfolio holdings as of September 30, 2024 is included in Attachment 2 to this report.

The Local Government Investment Pool (LAIF) yield typically moves in the same direction as market yields, but is less volatile, lagging somewhat behind market moves. This can be seen in the chart on the next page, illustrating the historical monthly change in yield from July 2021 through June2024 for LAIF and two-year US Treasury securities. The effective rate of return for the City Portfolio is also included.
5 Page 487
12/10/2024 Item No.20.

After a rapid ascent of the Federal Funds Rate in 2022 and 2023, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) paused from July 2023 until September 2024, when tates were cut by 50 basis points to 4.75-5 .00%. In November rates were cut further by 25 basis points to 4.50-

4.75%. The Consumer Price Index (CPD for October was up 2.60Yo year-over-year while the iobless rate for October was 4.l0oh. Both these numbers remain relatively unchanged since August, and point to the FOMC rate hikes finally having an impact in slowing down inflation.

The forecast was for rate cuts to continue, in an effort to stall any recession that may have come with slowing down the economy too much, with the consensus expecting to hit equilibrium around the3.50% mark, but with the White House changing parties, and the threat of tariffs and economic sanctions to come, it's very likely the FOMC will become much more deliberate to see what effects, if any, the policies of the new administration have on the economy. Due to this expected change in strategy by the FOMC, the bond market has rebounded, as 1 0 year Treasury rates fell from a high of 4.7 \Yo in April 2024 to a low of 3 .63o/o in September, and have now bounced back to the 4.30-4.40Yo range as of the end of November.

Yield Comparison
July 2022 - September 2024
s.s0%

5.00%

4.50o/o

4.000h

3.50o/o

3.00%

2.500h

2.00o/o

1.50%

1.00o/o
t+
-I -r
--l
-f- -f
1$ qo! +!r} {rt $p- 1$ eo! +1o,i} {r- $r* r$ rd
+I,AIF *-2 Yr Trsy _{_Clty
A listing of transactions for the first quarter of fiscal year 2025 is included in Attachment 3 to this report.

Folsom Redevelopment S uccessor Agency
Total Cash and Investments
The RDSA had total cash and investments of $4,543 ,926 as of September 30, 2024. This is an increase of $1,014,160 (29%) since September 30, 2023. The cash held by the RDSA is comprised of city-held funds, as well as 2011 bond proceeds to be utilized for housing and 6 Page 488
12/10/2024 Item No.20.
non-housing projects. These proceeds held by the Agency are broken out individually in the Portfolio Management Summary in Attachment 1'
The following table and graph illustrate the monthly balances and their respective percentage changes for the reporting period. Monthly fluctuations in cash and investments are the result of typical receipt of revenues less expenditures for operations, debt service, and capital improvements.

Folsom Redevelopment Successor Agency
2024-25
Monthly
Change 2023-24
Monthly
Change
Yearly $
Change
Yearly oh
Change
Jul
Aug
Sep
-41%
0%
-46%
0%
$
$
$
7,647,114
4,543,915
4,543,926
$ 6,587,646
$ 3,529,550
$ 3,529,766
$ 1,059,468
$ 1,014,365
$ 1,014,160
t6%
29%
29%
Folsom Redevelopment Successor Agency Total Cash and Investments s12,000,000
$9,000,000
s6,000,000
$3,000,000
s0
Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
tr2022-23 8202324 a2024-25
The RDSA's projected cash needs for the next six months are sufficiently provided for by anticipated revenues and the liquidity of its cash and investments.

Investment Performance
The RDSA's Portfolio Management Summary report for the month of September 2024 rs presented in Attachment 1. The RDSA's investment earnings for the three-month quarter ended September 30, 2024 totaled $53,833. The effective rate of return for the RDSA investment portfolio for the same time period is 4.630/o. 7 Page 489
12/10/2024 Item No.20.

Folsom Public Financing Authorifii
Total Cash and Investments
The FPFA cash and investments totaled 526,231,879 as of September 30, 2024. This is a decrease of $2,997,594 (16%) from September 30, 2023. Monthly fluctuations in cash and investments are the result of typical receipt of debt service repayment revenues and the subsequent debt service expenditures. The following table and graph illustrate the monthly balances and their respective percentage changes for the reporting period.

Folsom Public Financing Authority
2024-25
Monthly
Change 2023-24
Monthly
Change
Yearly $
Change
Yeaily oh
Change
Jul
Aug
Sep
$ 29,237,861
$ 29,231,870
$ 26,231,879
0%
-10%
-9%
-9%
-10%
$ 32,214,456
$ 32,274,464
s 29,229,473
$ (2,982,595)
$ (2,982,595)
$ (2,997,594)
0%
-9%
Folsom Public Financing Authority Total Cash and Investments $40,000,000
s35,000,000
$30,000,000
s25,000,000
$20,000,000
Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
rJ2022:23 a2023-24 .2024-25
The FPFA's projected cash needs for the next six months are sufficiently provided for by anticipated revenues and the liquidity of its cash and investments.

Investment Performance
The FPFA's Portfolio Management Summary repoft for the month of September 2024 rs presented in attachment 1. The FPFA's investment earnings for the three-month quarter ended September 30,2024 totaled $195,614. The effective rate of return for the FPFA investment portfolio for the same time period is 2.80oh.
8Page 490
12/10/2024 Item No.20.

Folsom Ranch Financing AuthoritY
Total Cash and Investments
The FRFA cash and investments totaled $135,480,000 as of September 30,2024, an increase $9,535,000 from the prior year. This increase is due to the issuance and purchase of $10,760,000 Community Facilities District No. 23 IA2 (Folsom Ranch) Local Obligations less the maturing of $1,225,000 of local obligations held by FRFA on September 1, 2024.

The Authority's projected cash needs for the next six months are sufficiently provided for by anticipated revenues and the liquidity of its cash and investments.

Investment Performance
The FRFA's Portfolio Management Summary report for the month of September 2024 is presented in attachment 1. The FRFA's investment earnings for the three-month quarter ended September 30,2024 totaled $1,618,269. The effective rate of return for the FRFA investment portfolio for the same time period is 4.83%o.

South of 50 Parking Authority
Total Cash and Investments
The South of 50 Parking Authority cash and investments totaled $0 as of September 30,2024.

The Authority's projected cash needs for the next six months are sufficiently provided for by anticipated revenues and the liquidity of its cash and investments.

Investment Performance
There is no investment activity for the South of 50 Parking Authority

ATTA NTS

1. City of Folsom, Folsom Redevelopment Successor Agency, Folsom Public Financing Authority, and Folsom Ranch Financing Authority Portfolio Management Summary September 2024

2. City of Folsom Portfolio Holdings as of September 30,2024

3. City of Folsom Transaction Summary, First Quarter of Fiscal Yeat2025 Submiffed,
Finance Director
Agency Finance Officer
Folsom Public Financing Authority Treasurer
Folsom Ranch Financing Authority Treasurer
South of 50 Parking Authority Treasurer
9 Page 491
12/10/2024 Item No.20.

ATTACHMENT 1

12/10/2024 Item No.20.

CitY of Folsom
Gombined City of Folsom, Redevelopment
Successor AgencY, FPFA & FRFA
Portfolio Summaries
SePtember 30,2024
Market DaYs to
50 Natoma St.

Folsom, CA 95630
(s16) 461-6080
ol" ot
Porfiolio
]F()]LSON4T
Face Amounu Book
value
Accrued
lnter€st
of
Cash
Certilicate Of DePosit
Commercial Paper
Corporate Bond
Local Govemment lnveslment Pool
Money Market
Municipal Bond
US Agencies
US Treasuries
Cost
4"874o/o

4.217o/o

5.360%
3"870%

5.133o/o

5. t30%

3.609%
4-O59o/o

1.570%
1,036,072.00
17,705,000.00
7,500,000.00
32,088,000.00

65.598,247.22
22,312,634.48
74,790,000:00
70,500,000.00
cost Value
1,036,072.00
17,684,305.24
7,243,260.42
31,631,484.20
65,598,247.22
22,312,634.44
7'1,608,269.65
70,083,790.65
1,036,072.00
17,869,896.08
7,416,225.00
31,713,125.42
65,598,247.22
22,712,634.4E
72,732,251.75
70,311,650.50
't32,192.26
2A7,440-43
1 65,398.91
437,476.67
664,067.63

0.35 5.95

2.52 10.78

22.05 7"50

25.14 23.70

2.02 100.00
Total Rate
1,036,072-00
17 ,691,526.70
7,404,1 00.00
31,750,569.38
65,59A,247.22
2?,31?,634.48

72.534,589.16
70,306,014.37
$ 289,894,808.36
4,541,249.24
139,800.48
1 832
E9
703
1 1
853
830
792.25 104.77

4.298% I 297,529953.70 5 293,130,065.11 $ 294,575,E58.08 $ 295'05r'r52.41i 55s $ 1,769,901.31 Book %of lntelest
of
City of Folsom Cash and lnvesimenls (excluding RDSA, FPFA & FRFA AMOUNTS) Redevelopment Sucessor Agency (included in RDSA lnvestment Report) Public Financing Aulhorily (included in PFA tnvestment RePori) Folsom Ranch Financing Authority (included in FRFA lnvestment Report) Total Pooled EquitY

98.41%
1,540/"

0.0s%

0.007o
Malket DaYsto Acorued %of
$ 3,364,336.24
53,832.55
195,614.31
Cash
Non-Housing 201 1A Proceeds
Housing 20118 Proeeds
Money Market
Total, Average
YTM Cost
Face Amounu
Shares cost Value
1,137 ,O77.O7
2,591,235.00
812,877.17
Book
Value
1,137,O77.47
2,591,295.00
I'12,877.17
Book

4.31OYo
4-31OVo

4.31QYo
1,137 ,O77.O7
2,591,295"00
8',12,877.17

2.677.19
1,137,077 -07
2,591,295.00
u2,a77"17
illa?ket
value
1 1
I

25.02 57.03

17.89 19 19 19
r1.360% $ 4,543,926J3 $ 4'54i1,926./$l $ 4,543,926-.til $ 4s43,926.43 1$ 100.00 Daysto Acctued %oI
Faoe Amounu
Public
Cash
Money Market
Municipal Bond
Totel I Aver.ge
YTI/I
139,800.48
2,O78.37
Urhre
139,800.48
2,O78.37
139,800.48
2,O7A37
't39,800"48
2,075.37

4.310o/o

4.AlS%
,|
1 1911

0.53 0.01

99.4657

2. 100.00

2.768% $ 26,231,E78.85 $ 26,231'878.85 $ 26,231,876.85 $ 20'231,878.85 l9o0 $ 57,988.64 Book Ma]ket Deysto Accrusd th ol
Ranch
Municipal Bond
Total / Averege
YTM
Face Amound
Gd Shares CostValus
100.007067 12

4.754"/o
415/l% i 135,,080'000.00
November 27
I
Slacey Tamagni, Finance Direclor Date
2024
$ 135,480,000.00 $ 135,480,000.00 5 135't180'000.00 706? s 518,831.12 100.00

12/10/2024 Item No.20.

ATTACHMENT 2

12/10/2024 Item No.20.

City of Folsom
Portfolio Holdings
Portfolio Holdings for lnv, RePort
Report Format: BY Transaclion
Portfolio / Report Group: City of Folsom
GrouP BY: Security TYPe
Average By: Face Amount / Shares
As of 9/30/2024
Coupon
Ratols6uerDescdptlon
0-0136,072.000.000Wells FarqoCash 5.050 1 0.34

0.351.036.072.14.874

0.08243.000.005.250via CU9tlullwrt vl uqFrr

0.08249.000.004.600rlaska USA FCH

0.084.950USA
0,08246,000,00
ailv Brnk-
Arnerican Express Nalional Bank
-
3,1 50

0.085.050 248,000,00Auslin Telco

0.0e243,000.05.1 50ofof America
West 5

3. 1

0.08248,000.00of the 5.O00

0.081.950 247,OOO.Aarclavs Bank

0.08244,000.004.700beal Bank

1.95 4. 0_08244,000.004.700USA513012029 0.08244,000.004.208

0.084.600 244,000.00NA4.6 0,o6246.000.002.500Bank

0.0{243.000.005.650dE.lifornia cU

0.0E3.500 245,000.00Foital One Bank (USA) NA

0.08245.000.003.500G;'itial one NA
0,084.000 245,000,00ffi

0.08244.000.004.700FSBank

0.0243,000.005.400Charter oak CU
248.000.00 0.085.25Crartwav CU

0.0244.000.004.750crBe'EanRfsA
Oak
7t1

0.085.400 249.000-00U5.4 0.08249,000.002.600

3.400
Connexus 3.4 811512025 244.000.00 0.084.500

0.08248,000.005.700Direct FCUFCU 5.7

3.2511

4.5 0.083.200 246,000.00

0.08247
6/1
246,000.00 0.082.900
0_08244,000"004.350Fntemrise Bank

4.85 111Flrst

0.084.850 244,000.0oFirsl Famlly FCU

0.08249,000.004.700First Federal Savings Bank

0.08244,000.004.700

0.084.500 244,000.00fiiTational Bank of Middle Tennessee

0.0249,000.003.1 00lreenState CU

4.7 1

4.7 I
112Bank
CU o.061.100 249,000.00ionemnesboro State Ba nk
1 0.08244,000.004.300NA4"3 1 0.08249,000.003.200Chase

4.35 1

0.084.350 244,000.00

0.08246,000.002.550

0.08248,000.005.000Leaders CU
249.000.00 0.084.350Libertv First CU

0.08243,000.005.200nt-6iticetto gankins co.111612026
NA
5 4.35
11 248,000.005.650

0.08243,000.005.000

4.6 lnc. 51 0.08249,000.001.400PentaoonFCU

0.0E4.600Pinnacle Bank

0.084.000 249,000.00BanK

0.08249,00C4.650
CU4.65
Red Crown CV 5.4 1ol13l2o
-

0.08243,000.005.000enasant Bank

12/10/2024 Item No.20.

0.08244.000.004.500Saco & Biddeford Svg

0.02.000 247,000.00Safra t'tatlonal Bank of NY

0.08244.000.004.500
Bank 4.5 0.0244,000.004.90(t26 0.0E3.400 249,000,00Sharonview FCU

0.085,100

4.750

0.06245,000.003.85
SDokane I eachers uu
Slete Bank of lndia Chicago

0.08245,000.003.350State ean[ of lndia NY
o.0E4.800 248,000.0c
0,08243,000.005,00

0.081.250 249,000.00Texas Exchange Bank, SSB
-

0.08 0.

4.400
12J1
4,4
00The Pitnev Bowes Bank, lnc.

Third Federal S&L of clevelandtd3.56l28l202t 0.0E4.750 244,000.00 2775 11 0.08245.000.3.450

0.0244,000.004.600BankBank 4.6 0.08243.000,0c5.0tffii nttiance e'anx

5.94.166 17.705,000.00)f Deoosit

0.842,500,000.000-000dEoitAqricoie cte HYNYO 2,500,000.00 0.840.000 01 0.842.500.000.00_000NY
U 2.52o.oo0 7,500,000.00
)ommerciel Paret

0.67o,Eo0 2,000,000.00
0,674.000E;[iiAmericaeotp4 0.3415.50067nk of ernerica CorP

0.67 0.34
IBank of Montrealilonlreal 1 22 3117 12026-22
3t1 0.671"500
BK

0.31,045,000.004.500lrlcan Devel Bk 43 6/15f2028-?8
rce Cilu. 4-S 711312028 0.672.800 2,000,000.00John D€ere CaDital GorP

2.95 0.34'1,000,000.002.950iF Morqan chase a co
1,000,000.00 0.3,5.O50trrtassttttutuat elof al Fundino

1.000.000.00 0.344.754Bank NAMoroan

1.2 0.501.200 1,500.000.00ilirrcliteeFtt 0.343.250 1,000,000.00PNC BanK NANA 3,25 1.013.3826lal gank ot GnadaVat o.293.300 865,000.00state Street CorD

0.341.000,000.05.104State Street Conp

0.903.400 2,678.000.006Fta Motor Credit CorP.
o.674.650 2.000,000.00tovota Motor Gredit CorP.

0.67 1.000.000.00
2,000,000.005.250

USAA USAA
112026 32.088,000.00 10.783.31;
I

1.75 3.A75 211

0.674.g 4.875 11n 0,67B-25
17 o.67
0 Bond

0.6 1211 0.17FHLB

2.97 FHLB2

3.2 1

4.000
1J,
4

12/10/2024 Item No.20.

4.7 IHLB 4.700 3,000,000.00 1.01
5,25 FHLB 5.250

5.300 1.01

5.4 5.400

2.000

1.01 4.00 1.350.000.00 0.45
2t1
FHLB 1.300 2,000,000.00 0.67

3.541 32.100.000.00 10.79
- z.ooopoo.ool 0.670.375FNMA
2poo,ooo.ool 0.675.000:NMA't2r)29-25 1.000,000.001 0.345.650INMA

5.65 1 5,000,000,001 1.663.280FNMA EONd

0.343.450

13.750
4 3,75 I
4,3

0.341,000,000.004.300

1.013,000,000.004.300

0.672,000,000.005.350

4.1712,400,000.004.244
.460
GOBs 0.43USD
101112026
12025
751 1211Cent .051
1"051 IcA st 1.288
81112025
81112025
12024Bonds
111112024 1.521Bonds1.521 1 0.55
111112028 1.315,
TABsTABs 0.03

0.953 USDFolsom2 t2024
Dist 2
ESDESD

0.57 1.768
000.00 0.30GOsGOs 0.679
ccD 2.203USDMoreno2.203 0.04
UHSD 1
usD 6.5
LGIP 'lI 5.2601
713

5. 3.801.8M.11 1-285. t3

6.2218,510,770.375.1 30

7.505.1 30
Sub Total / Averase Money Market

12/10/2024 Item No.20.
ccD

0.921 1,000,000.00 0.3/
San Jose Everqreen CCD 5.070 1.500,000.00 0.50
San Jose
San 3i76 Anl2026
San Lose RDA-SA 3.07e 1,170,000,00 0.3!
San Jose RDA-SA 3.176 2.170.000,00 0.73
San Jose RDA€A 3.221 1.500,000.00 0.50
Jose 81112027
Jose 81112027

3.226 1.000.000.00 0.34
Jose RDA.SA 3.250 2.000,000.00 0_67
San Jose USD 1.O'.14 700,000.00 o.24
Santa ena Comm RDA-SA 3;967 1.485.000.00 0.50
DanHAlllt 9vllllll l\e^-s u.wvr e, r'-v-r
-
$nta-elsnts PFA Lease Rev 1,176 611t2025,2O- PFA 1.176 o.12 -683.697
8t1t2027
Texas

1.O47 0.67

0.67 11
1 St. of 5.000 785,000.00 0,26
State of Califotnia GO 1.700 2,000,000.00 0.67
of. 0.54
Shte of calltomla GO 2.375 10111?026 of California GO 2.371 SEG of califomia GO 2.375 815,000.00 0.2
of 3.050 0"67
of 3.05
GO
of 31112027
of 5.1
of celifomia GO 3.375 2,000,000.00 0.67
Slate of GO 4.846 1,000,000.00 0.3,
Stae otcatitomta oo 5.100 1.410.000.00 0.47

4.450

5.285
1 0.50
Sulohur SoflnOS UUU
UC Reqents GRBS SerAX 3.063 985,000.00 0_33
UC ResBntE Gngs SerAX 3.O63 2.000.000.00
. ^^^i^nnn 0.34

1.316 uC Reoents GRBS Ser BG '1.316 1.000.000.(
UG Reoents GRBS S€r na: 1.316 '1.000,000.00 0.3,

2.659 uC Reoents MCPRBS Ser M 2.659 900,000,0c 0.30
ccD 2.3 2.'180.000.0 o.73
1,350 680,000.00 0.2

1.35 1.350 820,000.00 o.28

1.689 YosemiteaeD 1.689 0.25
1 ccD 1.912 250,000.00
Yos€mlte CCo 2.O42 2.000.000,0 0,67

2.4o,2 74.790,000^00 25.14
Treasury25 10le

1.01 1.01Treasury

2.O24_1881 6,000,000.00

3.74e

12/10/2024 Item No.20.

ATTACHMENT 3

12/10/2024 Item No.20.

City of Folsom
Transactions Summary
Transaction Summary - lnvestment Report
Poftfolio / Report Group: City of Folsom
Group By: Action
Begin Date: 0710'112024, End Date: 0913012024
PrlnclpalINilurlty
Date
Face
AmUSh.ftaSecudty TypeDoscflptlon
FCU 5,4
17 7t1 -25
Certificate Of Deposit
FFCB Bond
7t3012024
7t1512024
7t30t2029
7t15t2027
249,000.00
3,000,000.00
249,000.00

3.000.000.00

5.400
ffi

4.3 711
FHLB
Bond
9t11
7t17t2024
9t4t2029
ffi
7t1812029

3.000.000.00
I

4.000

4.586

4.574
Mae Bank 4.5 711712029
uOlpurdtE o9l lu
Certificate Of Deposit 7t17t2024 7t't7l2o2g 244.000.00 244.000.00 4.500 San Jose RDA-SA 3.25 811 t2029 lMunicioal Bond 9t1812024 8t1t2029 2,000,000.00 1.950,240.00 3.8't4

3.697nta l\,lunicipal 9t2512024 8t112029 1,000.000.00 1.000.000.0r 3.697 Santa Monica-Malibu USD 1.047 81112027 lvluniciDal Bond 8t9t2024 8t112027 2,000,000.00 1,831,300.00 4.0Ei 16,493,000.0 16.086.570.00
,|
Bond5.33
7 3t20t20285.62 3t2012028-24
9/1 6t't3t2025
FHLMC 5.4
I

0.0002,13.000.00st16t2024 9116t2024 243,000.00Cedlficate Of DeposilBank of Hoos 5.25 911612024 0.000811t2024u1n024BondShores SD 0.638 81112024Belmont-Redwood 1 2.900,000.00 0.0002.500.000.007t2t2024Paper 7ta2024eofA Securities lnc. 0 Tl2lzOZ+

0.000400.000.008r1t2024 400,000.00Municioal Bond 8t112024Carson RDASA TABs 1.188 8t112o24

2.000.000.00 2.000,000.00oroorale Bond 8115nO24 8t15t2021CitiorounGloUatMarkets 4 811 512024-23 400.000.00 400.000.008t1t2024 il1n024Municloal BondCitrus CCD GOBS 0.669 8l'112024

0.0001.000.000.008t1t2024 8t112024 1.000,000.00Municloal Bondd6iion uSo o-e82 8/1/2oz+

2.500.000.00 0.0002.500.000.(7t17t2024]ommorclsl 7t17t2024Credit AEricole CIB NY 0 711712024

0.0003.000.000.00 3,000.000.017t9t2024 7t9t2024FHLB BondFHLB 5.08 71912024 2,000,000.0c 0.0002.000.000.008t2812024FHLB BONd 8128t2024FHLB SteD 812812024-22 1 0.000712612024 1,500,000.0FHLMC Bond5.05 0.00243.000.00 243,000.00Certificate Of Deposit 7t29t2024 7t25t2024First eank nichmond 5.25 712912024

0.000248,000,00712612024 7t26t20?4 248,000.00
243,000.00
7t26t2024
H, 0.0007t23t2024 s.000.000.00 5,000,000.00712312024Commercial PaPer0Term 0.0006t1t2024 195.000.00 1e5,000.00Munlcioal Bond 8t1t2024.941 81112024 247.000.00 0.0007125t2024 247.000.00Certificate Ol Deposit 7t25t20247t25t2024

0.000247.000.00 247,000.007t',t8t2024 7118t2024certilicate Of Deposlt

2.500.000.00 0.0009t18t2024 2,500,000,009t1812024MUFG Bank Ltd/NY 0 911812024 Commercial PaPer

2.500.000.00 0.0009t3t2024 2,500.000.00Commercial Paper 9t312024MUFG Bank LldiNY 0 9t312024 0,00c2.600,000.007t2n024 7u2024 ?,500,000.00Cornmercial PaperNatixis NY 0 71212024

0.000249.000.009t10t2024 249,000.009110t20249t1012024York 600.000.00 0.0008t1t2024 600,000.00Munlcipal Bond 8nn024Oak Grove SD 0.561 8l'll2o24

0.000345.000.0c 345,000.008t1t2024 8t1t2024Munlcioal BonddxnarC SO eOSs 0.82 81112024

0.0008t1t2024 1,000,00q00
680.000.00
thno215.3 811t2024
USD 0.67
Area

0.000249.000.00 249,000.008t2U2024 8t2212024Of DeposltProGrowth Bank 1.2 812212024

0.0001.000.000_00 1.000.000009t'v2024Munlcloal Bond 911t2024GCD GOBs 0.634 9t1t2024 18t1t2024 1.000.000.008t1t2024Munlclpal BondSan Bemardino CCD 0.605 81112024 249.000"0091912024 stst2024Certificate Of DoDosllBa

0.000500,000.008t1t2024 500.000.00ilunicioal Bond 8t1t2024Yosemlte CCD 0.804 81112024 300,000.00 300.000.00 0.00c8l'112024,?uniciDal Bond 8r1t2024YosemiGEcD 1.44 dfz624

36.888.000i0038.888,000.00Sub Totat I Average Matured

12/10/2024 Item No.20.