Folsom City Council
March 25, 2025

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

Covenants &
Restrictions (DCR's) in
compliance with the
requirements of the
USACE permit. The
DCR's are shown on the
finalmap.
and approval ofthose portions ofthe plan over which they have jurisdiction. The MMP would have to be finalized prior to impacting any wetlands. Once the final MMP is approved and implemented, mitigation monitoring shall continue for a minimum of 5 years from completion of mitigation, or human intervention (including recontouring and grading), or until the performance standards identified in the approved MMP have been met, whichever is longer.

As part of the MMP, the project applicant(s) shall prepare and submit plans for the creation of aquatic habitat in order to adequately offset and replace the aquatic functions and services that would be lost at the SPA, account for the temporal loss of habitat, and contain an adequate margin ofsafety to reflect anticipated success. Restoration of previously altered and degraded wetlands shall be a priority of the MMP for offsetting losses of aquatic functions on the SPA because it is typically easier to achieve functional success in restored wetlands than in those created from uplands. The MMP must demonstrate how the aquatic functions and values that would be lost through project implementation will be replaced.

The habitat MMP for jurisdictionalwetland features shall be consistent with USACE's and EPA's April 10, 2008 Final Rule for Compensatory Mitigation for Losses of Aquatic Resources (33 CFRParts 325 and332 and40 CFRPafi230) and
USACE's October 26,2010 Memorandum Re:Minimum Level
of Documentation Required for Permit Decisions. According to the Final Rule, mitigation banks should be given preference over other types of mitigation because a lot of the risk and uncertainty regarding mitigation success is alleviated by the fact that mitigation bank wetlands must be established and
demonstrating functionality before credits can be sold. The use of mitigation credits also alleviates temporal losses of wetland function while compensatory wetlands are being established.

Mitigation banks also tend to be on larger, more ecologically valuable parcels and are subjected to more rigorous scientific study and planning and implementation procedures than typical permittee-responsible mitigation sites (USACE and EPA, 2008).

Permittee-responsible on-site mitigation areas can be exposed to

03/25/2025 Item No.13.
longterm negative effects of sunounding development since they tend to be smaller and less buffered than mitigation banks.

The Final Rule also establishes a preference for a "watershed approach" in selecting locations for compensatory mitigation project locations, that mitigation selection must be "appropriate and practicable" and that mitigation banks must address watershed needs based on criteria set forth in the Final Rule. The watershed approach accomplishes this objective by expanding the informational and analytic basis of mitigation project site selection decisions and ensuring that both authorized impacts and mitigation are considered on a watershed scale rather than only project by project. This requires a degree offlexibility so that dishict engineers can authorize mitigation projects that most effectively address the case-specific circumstances and needs of the watershed, while remaining practicable for the permittee. The SPA includes portions of the Alder Creek, Buflalo Creek, Coyote Creek, and Carson Creek Watersheds. The majority of the SPA is within the Alder Creek Watershed. Alder Creek and Buffalo Creek are part ofthe Lower American River Watershed. Carson Creek and Coyote Creek are part of the Cosumnes River
Watershed. Mitigation credits may be available within the Cosumnes Watershed, but not within the American River
Watershed and not within the sub-watersheds of the SPA.

Therefore, aquatic habitats may need to be restored or created on the SPA and adjacent off-site lands, preferably wittrin the affected watersheds, in order to successfully replace lost functions at the appropriate watershed scale where loss of function would occur. It is not likely feasible to provide compensatory mitigation for all aquatic resource impacts on site.

Therefore, a combination of on-site and off-site permittee- responsible mitigation and mitigation banking would likely be necessary to achieve the no-net-loss standard.

The SPA is located within the service areas of several approved mitigation banks (e.g., Bryte Ranch, Clay Station, Fitzgerald Ranch, and Twin City Mitigation Bank). The majority of
compensatory mitigation for wetland impacts is proposed to be accomplished at an agency approved mitigation bank or banks authorized to sell credits to offset in the SPA. The

03/25/2025 Item No.13.
applicants' biological consultant, ECORP, has identified availability of approximately 3l vernal pool credits and228 seasonal wetland credits at mitigation banks whose service area includes the SPA. Additional credits may also be available from pending, but not yet approved, mitigation banks.

However, availability is subject to change and, as noted above, a combination of mitigation bank credits and permittee- responsible on and off-site mitigation may be necessary to fully offset project impacts on wetlands and other waters of the U.S.

If USACE determines that the use of mitigation bank credits is not sufficient mitigation to offset impacts within the SPA, the October 26,2010 Memorandum Re:Minimum Level of
Documentation Required for Permit Decisions requires USACE to specifically demonstrate why the use of bank credits is not acceptable to USACE in accordance with Section 33 CFR
332.3(a)(t).

Compensatory mitigation for losses of stream and intermittent drainage channels shall follow the Final Rule Guidelines, which specify that compensatory mitigation should be achieved through in-kind preservation, restoration, or enhancement within the same watershed, subject to practicability
considerations. The wetland MMP shall address how to
mitigate impacts on vernal pool, seasonal swale, seasonal wetland, seep, marsh, pond, and intermittent and perennial stream habitat, and shall describe specific method(s) to be implemented to avoid and/or mitigate any off-site projecl related impacts. The wetland compensation section of the habitat MMP shall include the following:
> Compensatory mitigation sites and criteria for selecting these mitigation sites. In General, compensatory mitigation sites should meet the following criteria, based on the Final Rule;
. located within the same watershed as the wetland or other waters that would be lost, as appropriate and practicable; . located in the most likely position to successfully replace wetland functions lost on the impact site considering
watershed-scale features such as aquatic habitat diversity,

03/25/2025 Item No.13.
habitat connectivity, available water sources and
hydrologic relationships, land use trends, ecological
benefits, and compatibility with adjacent land uses, and the likelihood for success and sustainability;
A complete assessment of the existing biological resources in both the on-site preservation areas and off-site
compensatory mitigation areas, including wetland
functional assessment using the California Rapid
Assessment Method (CRAM) (Collins et al. 2008), or
other appropriate wetland assessment protocol as
determined through consultation with USACE and the
USFWS, to establish baseline conditions;
Specific creation and restoration plans for each mitigation site;
Use of CRAM to compare compensatory wetlands to the
baseline CRAM scores from wetlands in the SPA. The
compensatory wetland CRAM scores shall be compared
against the highest quality wetland of each type from the SPA;
CRAM scores? or other wetland assessment protocol
scores, from the compensatory wetlands shall be compared against the highest quality wetland scores for each wetland type to document success of compensatory wetlands in
replacing the functions of the affected wetlands to be
replaced;
Monitoring protocol, including schedule and annual report requirements, and the following elements:
. ecological performance standards, based on the best
available science, that can be assessed in a practicable manner (e.g., performance standards proposed by Barbour elal.2007). Performance standards must be based on
attributes that are objective and verifiable;
. assessments conducted annually for 5 years after
conshuction or restoration of compensatory wetlands to
determine whether these areas are wetland

03/25/2025 Item No.13.
functions and to plot the performance trajectory of
preserved, restored, or created wetlands over time.
' assessments results for compensatory wetlands shall also be compared against scores for reference wetlands
assessed in the same year;
r assessments analysis conducted annually for 5 years after any construction adjacent to wetlands preserved on the
SPA to determine whether these areas are retaining
functions and values. Assessments results for wetlands
preserved on site shall also be compared against scores for reference wetlands assessed in the same year;
. analysis of assessments data, including assessment of potential shessors, to determine whether any remedial
activities may be necessary;
. corrective measures if performance standards are not met; r monitoring of plant communities as performance criteria (annual measure of success, during monitoring period)
and success criteria (indicative of achievement of
mitigation habitat requirement at end of monitoring
period) for hydrologic function have become established and the creation site "matures" over time;
. GIS analysis of compensatory wetlands to demonstrate
actual acreage of functioning wetland habitat;
. adaptive management measures to be applied if
performance standards and acreage requirements are not
being met;
. responsible parties for monitoring and preparing reports; and
. responsible parties for receiving and reviewing reports and for verifuing success or prescribing implementation or corrective actions.

A final operations and management plan (OMP) for all on- and off-site permittee-sponsored wetland preservation and
mitigation areas shall be prepared and submitted to USACE

03/25/2025 Item No.13.
and USFWS for review, comment and preliminary approval
prior to the issuance of any permits under Section 404 of the CWA. The plan shall include detailed information on the habitats present within the preservation and mitigation areas, the long-term management and monitoring of these habitats, legal protection for the preservation and mitigation areas (e.g., conservation easement, declaration of restrictions), and funding mechanism information (e.g., endowment). A finalOMP for each discretionary development entitlement affecting wetlands must be approved prior to construction.

USACE has determined that the project will require an
individual permit. In its final stage and once approved by USACE, the MMP for the project is expected to detail
proposed wetland restoration, enhancement , andlor replacement activities that would ensure no net loss of aquatic functions in the project vicinity. Approval and implementation of the wetland MMP shall aim to fully mitigate allunavoidable
impacts on jurisdictionalwaters of the U.S., including
jurisdictional wetlands. In addition to USACE approval, approval by the City, Sacramento County, El Dorado County, and the Central Valley RWQCB, as appropriate depending on agency jurisdiction, and as determined during the Section 401 and Section 404 permitting processes, will also be required.

Approvals from Sacramento County and El Dorado County
shall be required for impacts resulting from off-site project elements occurring in these counties, such as the off-site detention basin in Sacramento County and the roadway
connections into El Dorado County. To satisfy the requirements of the City and the Central Valley RWQCB, mitigation of impacts on the nonjurisdictional wetlands beyond the
jurisdiction of USACE shall be included in the same MMP. All mitigation requirements determined through this process shall be implemented before grading plans are approved. The MMP shall be submitted to USACE and approved prior to the
issuance of any permits under Section 404 of the CWA. Water quality certification pursuant to Section 401 of the CWA will be required before issuance of a Section 404 permit. Before construction in any areas containing wetland features, the

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

YesThe City and its
Environmental
Compliance Consultant
(Helix) have reviewed
all MMRP conditions
and verified compliance
with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance
was verified prior to
commencement of
grading and construction
in the Summer of 2022.

The compliance table is
on file with the City.

California
Department
of Fish and
Game and
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before the approval of
grading and
improvement plans,
before any ground
disturbing activities,
and during project
construction as
applicable for all
project phases.
project applicant($ shall obtain water quality certification for the project. Any measures required as part ofthe issuance of water quality certification shall be implemented.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries must be developed by the project applicant($ ofeach applicable project phase in
consultation with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., Caltrans, El Dorado and/or Sacramento Counties).

Avoid Direct Loss of Swainson's Hawk and Other Raptor
Nests. To mitigate impacts on Swainson's hawk and other raptors (including burrowing owl), the project applican($ of all project phases shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct preconstruction surveys and to identifu active nests on and within 0.5 mile of the SPA and active bunows on the SPA. The surveys shall be conducted before the approval ofgrading and/or improvement plans (as applicable) and no less than 14 days and no more than 30 days before the beginning of
construction for all project phases. To the extent feasible, guidelines provided in Recommended Timing and
Methodology for Swainson's Hawk Nesting Surveys in the
Central Valley (Swainson's Hawk Technical Advisory
Committee 2000) shall be followed for surveys for Swainson's hawk. If no nests are found, no further mitigation is required.

If active nests are found, impacts on nesting Swainson's hawks and other raptors shall be avoided by establishing appropriate buffers around the nests. No project activity shall commence within the buffer area until the young have fledged, the nest is no longer active, or until a qualified biologist has determined in consultation with DFG that reducing the buffer would not result in nest abandonment. DFG guidelines recommend
implementation of 0.25- or 0.5-mile-wide buffers, but the size of the buffer may be adjusted if a qualified biologist and the City, in consultation with DFG, determine that such an
adjustment would not be likely to adversely affect the nest.

Monitoring of the nest by a qualified biologist during and after conshuction activities will be required if the activity has potential to adversely affect the nest.
3A.3-2B
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
7t-14

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

YesThe City and its
Environmental
Compliance Consultant
(Helix) have reviewed
all MMRP conditions
and verified compliance
with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance
was verified prior to
commencement of
grading and conshuction
in the Summer of 2022.

The compliance table is
on file with the City.

City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before the approval of
grading, improvement,
or construction plans
and before any ground
disturbing activity in
any project
development phase
that would affect
Swainson's hawk
foraging habitat.

If active bunows are found, a mitigation plan shall be
submitted to the City for review and approval before any ground-disturbing activities.

The City shall consult with DFG. The mitigation plan may consist of installation of one-way doors on all bunows to allow owls to exit, but not reenter, and construction of artificial burrows within the project vicinity, as needed; however, bunow owl exclusions may only be used if a qualified biologist verifies that the bunow does not contain eggs or dependent young. Ifactive bunows contain eggs and/or young, no
construction shall occur within 50 feet of the bunow until young have fledged. Once it is confirmed that there are no owls inside bunows, these bunows may be collapsed.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries must be developed by the project applicant(s) ofeach applicable project phase in consultation with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or Sacramento Counties, or Caltrans), such that the performance criteria set forth in DFG's guidelines are
determined to be mel
Mitigation Measure 3A.3-2b: Prepare and Implement a
Swainson's Ilawk Mitigation Plan.

To mitigate for the loss of Swainson's hawk foraging habitat, the project applicant(s) ofall project phases shall prepare and implement a Swainson's hawk mitigation plan including, but not limited to the requirements described below.

Before the approval of grading and improvement plans or before any ground-disturbing activities, whichever occurs first, the project applicant($ shall preserve, to the satisfaction ofthe City or Sacramento County, as appropriate depending on
agency jurisdiction, suitable Swainson's hawk foraging habitat to ensure 1:1 mitigation of habitat value for Swainson's hawk foraging habitat lost as a result of the project, as determined by the City, or Sacramento County, after consultation with DFG and a qualified biologist.

The l:l habitat value shallbe based on Swainson's hawk
nesting distribution and an assessment of habitat quality, 3A.3-2b
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
7t-15

03/25/2025 Item No.13.
availability, and use within the City's planning are4 or Sacramento County jurisdiction. The mitigation ratio shallbe consistent with the 1994 DFG Swainson's Hawk Guidelines included in the StaffReport Regarding Mitigation for Impacts to Swainson's Hawks (Buteo swainsoni) in the Central Valley of California, which call for the following mitigation ratios for loss of foraging habitat in these categories: 1:1 if within I mile of an active nest site, 0.75:l if over 1 mile but less than 5 miles, and 0.5:1 if over 5 miles but less than l0 miles from an active nest site. Such mitigation shall be accomplished through credit purchase from an established mitigation bank approved to sell Swainson's hawk foraging habitat credits to mitigate losses in the SPA, if available, or through the transfer of fee title or perpetual conservation easement. The mitigation land shall be located within the known foraging area and within Sacramento County. The City, or Sacramento County if outside City
jurisdiction, after consultation with DFG, will determine the appropriateness of the mitigation land.

Before approval of such proposed mitigation, the City, or Sacramento County for the off-site detention basin, shall consult with DFG regarding the appropriateness of the
mitigation. If mitigation is accomplished through conservation easement, then such an easement shall ensure the continued management of the land to maintain Swainson's hawk foraging values, including but not limited to ongoing agricultural uses and the maintenance of all existing water rights associated with the land. The conservation easement shall be recordable and shall prohibit any activity that substantially impairs or diminishes the land's capacity as suitable Swainson's hawk habitat.

The project applicant(s) shall transfer said Swainson's hawk mitigation land, through either conservation easement or fee title, to a third party, nonprofit conservation organization (Conservation Operator), with the City and DFG named as third-party beneficiaries. The Conservation Operator shall be a qualified conservation easement land manager that manages land as its primary function. Additionally, the Conservation Operator shall be a tax-exempt nonprofit conservation

03/25/2025 Item No.13.
organization that meets the criteria of Civil Code Section 815.3(a) and shall be selected or approved by the City or County, after consultation with DFG. The City, or County, after consultation with DFG and the Conservation Operator, shall approve the content and form ofthe conservation easement.

The City, or County, DFG, and the Conservation Operator shall each have the power to enforce the terms of the conservation easement. The Conservation Operator shall monitor the
easement in perpetuity to assure compliance with the terms of the easement.

The project applicant(s), after consultation with the City, or County ofjurisdiction, DFG, and the Conservation Operator, shall establish an endowment or some other financial
mechanism that is sufficient to fund in perpetuity the operation, maintenance, management, and enforcement of the
conservation easement. If an endowment is used, either the endowment funds shallbe submitted to the City for impacts on lands within the City's jurisdiction or Sacramento County for the off-site detention basin to be distributed to an appropriate third-party nonprofit conservation agency, or they shall be submitted directly to the third-party nonprofit conservation agency in exchange for an agreement to manage and maintain the lands in perpetuity. The Conservation Operator shall not sell, lease, or transfer any interest of any conservation easement or mitigation land it acquires without prior wriffen approval of the City and DFG. Mitigation lands established or acquired for impacts incuned at the off-site detention basin shall require approval from Sacramento County prior to sale or transfer of mitigation lands or conservation easement.

Ifthe Conservation Operator ceases to exist, the duty to hold, administer, manage, maintain, and enforce the interest shall be transfened to another entity acceptable to the City and DFG, or Sacramento County and DFG depending on jurisdiction of the afflected habitat. The City Planning Department shall ensure that mitigation habitat established for impacts on habitat within the City's planning area is properly established and is functioning as habitat by reviewing regular monitoring reports prepared by the Conservation Operator of the mitigation site(s).

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

YesThe City and its
Environmental
Compliance Consultant
(Helix) have reviewed
all MMRP conditions
and verified compliance
with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance
was verified prior to
commencement of
grading and conshuction
in the Summer of 2022.

The compliance table is
on file with the City.

City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before the approval of
any ground-disturbing
activity within 500 feet
of suitable nesting
habitat as applicable
for all project phases.

Monitoring of the mitigation site(s) shall continue for the first 10 years after establishment of the easement and shall be funded through the endowment, or other appropriate funding mechanism, established by the project applicant(s). Sacramento County shall review the monitoring reports for impacts on habitat at the off-site detention basin.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by ttre project applicant($ ofeach applicable project phase with the aflected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., Sacramento County and Caltrans).

Avoid and Minimize Impacts to Tricolored Blackbird
Nesting Colonies. To avoid and minimize impacts to tricolored blackbird, the project applicant(s) ofall project phases shall conduct a preconstruction survey for any project activity that would occur during the tricolored blackbird's nesting season (March l-August 3l). The preconstruction survey shallbe conducted by a qualified biologist before any activity occuning within 500 feet of suitable nesting habitat, including freshwater marsh and areas of riparian scrub vegetation. The survey shall be conducted within 14 days before project activity begins.

If no tricolored blackbird colony is present, no further mitigation is required. If a colony is found, the qualified biologist shall establish a buffer around the nesting colony. No project activity shall commence within the buffer area until a qualified biologist confirms that the colony is no longer active.

The size of the buffer shall be determined in consultation with DFG. Buffer size is anticipated to range from 100 to 500 feet, depending on the nature ofthe project activity, the extent of existing disturbance in the area, and other relevant
circumstances.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom' s jurisdictional boundaries (i.e., U. S. 50 interchange improvements) must be developed by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase in consultation with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., Caltrans) and must be sufficient to achieve the performance criteria described above.
3A.3-2c
(FPASP
ErR/EIS)
7t-16

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

Yes
Yes
The City and its
Environmental
Compliance Consultant
(Helix) have reviewed
allMMRP conditions
and verified compliance
with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance
was verified prior to
commencement of
grading and construction
in the Summer of 2022.

The compliance table is
on file with the City.

The City and its
Environmental
Compliance Consultant
(Helix) have reviewed
all MMRP conditions
and verified compliance
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
U.S. Army
Corps of
Engineers,
Sacramento
District;U.S
Fish and
Before the approval of
any ground-disturbing
activity within 500 feet
of suitable nesting
habitat as applicable
for all project phases.

Before the approval of
any grading or
improvement plans,
before any ground
disturbing activities
within 250 feet of said
Avoid and Minimize Impacts to Special-Status Bat Roosts.

The project applicant ofall project phases containing potential bat roosting habitat shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct surveys for roosting bats. Surveys shall be conducted in the fall to determine if the mine shaft is used as a hibernaculum and in spring and/or summer to determine if it is used as a maternity or day roost. Surveys shall consist ofevening emergence surveys to note the presence or absence ofbats and could consist of visual surveys at the time of emergence. If evidence ofbat use is observed, the number and species ofbats using the roost shall be determined. Bat detectors may be used to supplement survey efforts. Ifno bat roosts are found, then no further study shall be required.

If roosts of pallid bat or Townsend's big-eared bats are determined to be present and must be removed, the bats shall be excluded from the roosting site. A mitigation progam
addressing compensation, exclusion methods, and roost
removal procedures shall be developed in consultation with DFG before implementation. Exclusion methods may include use ofone-way doors at roost entrances (bats may leave but not reenter), or sealing roost enhances when the site can be confirmed to contain no bats. Exclusion efforts may be
restricted during periods ofsensitive activity (e.g., during hibernation or while females in maternity colonies are nursing young). The loss of each roost (if any) will be replaced in consultation with DFG and may include conshuction and
installation ofbat boxes suitable to the bat species and colony size excluded from the original roosting site. Roost replacement will be implemented before bats are excluded from the original roost sites. Once the replacement roosts are constructed and it is confirmed that bats are not present in the original roost site, the mine shaft may be removed.

Secure Take Authorization for Federally Listed Vernal
Pool Invertebrates and Implement All Permit Conditions.

No project construction shall proceed in areas supporting potential habitat for Federally listed vernal pool invertebrates, or within adequate buffer areas (250 feet or lesser distance deemed sufficiently protective by a qualified biologist with 3A.3-2d
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.3-2g
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
7t-tj
71-18

03/25/2025 Item No.13.
with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance
was verified prior to
commencement of
grading and construction
in the Summer of 2022.

The compliance table is
on file with the City.

Wildlife
Service; and
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
habitat or lesser
distance deemed
suffi ciently protective
by a qualified biologist
with approval from
USFWS, and on an
ongoing basis
throughout
construction as
applicable for all
project phases as
required by the
mitigation plan, BO,
and/or BMPs.
approval from USFWS), until a biological opinion (BO) or Not Likely to Adversely Affect (NLAA) letter has been issued by USFWS and the project applicant(s) for any particular
discretionary development entitlements affecting such areas have abided by conditions in the BO (including conservation and minimization measures) intended to be completed before on-site construction. Conservation and minimization measures shall include preparation of supporting documentation
describing methods to protect existing vernal pools during and after project construction, a detailed monitoring plan, and reporting requirements.

As described under Mitigation Measure 3A.3-la, an MMP shall be developed that describes details how loss ofvernal pool and other wetland habitats shall be offset, including details on creation of habitat, account for the temporal loss of habitat, contain performance standards to ensure success, and outline remedial actions if performance standards are not met.

The project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application potentially affecting vernal pool habitat shall complete and implement a habitat MMP that will result in no net loss ofacreage, function, and value ofaffected vernalpoolhabitat. The finalhabitat MMP shall be consistent with guidance provided in Programmatic Formal Endangered Species Act Consultation on Issuance of 404 Permits for Projects with Relatively SmallEffects on Listed Vernal Pool Crustaceans within the Jurisdiction of the Sacramento Field Office, California (USFWS 1996) or shall provide an
alternative approach that is acceptable to the City, USACE, and USFWS and accomplishes no net loss of habitat acreage,
function, and value.

The project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application "potentially affecting vernal pool habitat" shall ensure that there is suffrcient upland habitat within the target areas for creation and restoration ofvernal pools and vernal pool complexes to provide ecosystem health.

This standard shall be accomplished by requiring the project applican(s) for any discretionary development application affectine vernal pool or seasonal wetland habitat to identify the

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

YesThe City and its
Environmental
Compliance Consultant
(Helix) have reviewed
California
Department
of Fish and
Game and
Before the approval of
grading or
improvement plans or
any construction
extent ofindirectly affected vernal pool and seasonal wetland habitat, either by identifying all such habitat within 250 feet of project construction activities or by providing an alternative technical evaluation. Ifa lesser distance is pursued, this distance shall be approved by USFWS. The project applicant(s) shall preserve acreage ofvernal pool habitat for each wetted acre of any indirectly affected vernal pool habitat ataratio approved by USFWS at the conclusion of the Section 7
consultation. This mitigation shall occur before the approval of any grading or improvement plans for any project phase that would allow work within 250 feet of such habitat or lesser distance deemed sufficiently protective by a qualified biologist with approval from USFWS, and before any ground disturbing activity within 250 feet of the habitat or lesser distance deemed sufficiently protective by a qualified biologist with approval from USFWS. The project applicant(s) will not be required to complete this mitigation measure for direct or indirect impacts that have already been mitigated to the satisfaction of USFWS through another BO or mitigation plan (i.e., if impacts on specific habitat acreage are mitigated by one project phase or element, the project applicant(s) will not be required to mitigate for it again in another phase ofthe project).

A standard set of BMPs shall be applied to conshuction
occuning in areas within 250 feet of off-site vernal pool habitat, or within any lesser distance deemed adequate by a qualified biologist (with approval from USFWS) to constitute a sufficient buffer from such habitat. Refer to Section 3A.9, "Hydrology and Water Quality - Land" for the details of BMPs to be implemented.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries must be developed by the project applicant(s) ofeach applicable project phase in consultation with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or Sacramento Counties, or Caltrans).

Mitigation Measure 3A.3-4a: Secure and Implement
Section 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement. The project applicant(s)
application
for any particular discretionary development
shall obtain a Section 1602 streambed alteration
3A.3-4a
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
7t-19

03/25/2025 Item No.13.
all MMRP conditions
and verified compliance
with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance
was verified prior to
commencement of
grading and construction
inthe Summer of 2022.

The compliance table is
on file with the City.

City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
activities (including
clearing and grubbing)
that affect the bed and
bank or riparian and
freshwater marsh
habitat associated with
Alder Creek and other
on-site or off-site
drainage channels and
ponds.
agreement from DFG for all construction activities that would occur in the bed and bank ofAlder Creek and other drainage channels and ponds on the SPA. As a condition of issuance of the streambed alteration agreement, the project applicant($ for any particular discretionary development application affecting riparian habitat shall hire a qualified restoration ecologist to prepare a riparian habitat MMP. The draft MMP shall describe specific method(s) to be implemented to avoid and/or
compensate for impacts on the stream channel of Alder Creek and other drainage channels within DFG jurisdiction, and the bed and banks of the on-site ponds. Mitigation measures may include establishment or restoration of riparian habitat within the project's open space areas along preserved stream conidors, riparian habitat restoration off-site, or preservation and enhancement of existing riparian habitat either on or off the SPA. The compensation habitat shallbe similar in composition and structure to the habitat to be removed and shall be at ratios adequate to offset the loss ofriparian habitat functions and services at the SPA. The riparian habitat compensation section of the habitat MMP shall include the following:
> compensatory mitigation sites and criteria for selecting these mitigation sites;
> complete assessment of the existing biological resources in both the on-site and off-site preservation and restoration areas;
> site-specific management procedures to benefit
establishment and maintenance of native riparian plant
species, including black willow, ztlroyo willow, white
alder, and Fremont cottonwood;
> a planting and inigation program if needed for
establishment of native riparian trees and shrubs at
strategic locations within each mitigation site (planting and inigation may not be necessary if preservation of
functioning riparian habitat is chosen as mitigation or if restoration can be accomplished without inigation or
planting);

03/25/2025 Item No.13.
> in kind reference habitats for comparison with
compensatory riparian habitats (using performance and
success criteria) to document success;
> monitoring protocol, including schedule and annual report requirements (compensatory riparian habitats shall be
monitored for a minimum period of five years);
> ecological performance standards, based on the best
available science and including specifications for native riparian plant densities, species composition, amount of dead woody vegetation gaps and bare ground, and
survivorship; at a minimum, compensatory mitigation
planting sites must achieve 80% survival of planted
riparian trees and stnubs by the end ofthe five-year
maintenance and monitoring period or dead and dying
trees shall be replaced and monitoring continued until 80% survivorship is achieved;
> conective measures if performance standards are not met; > responsible parties for monitoring and preparing reports; and
> responsible parties for receiving and reviewing reports and for veriffing success or prescribing implementation or
conective actions.

Any conditions of issuance of the Streambed Alteration
Agreement shall be implemented as part of project construction activities that adversely affect the bed and bank and riparian habitat associated with Alder Creek and other drainage
channels and ponds that are within the project area that is subject to DFG jurisdiction. The agreement shall be executed by the project applicant(s) and DFG before the approval ofany grading or improvement plans or any construction activities in any project phase that could potentially affect the bed and bank of Alder Creek and other on-site or off-site drainage channels under DFG jurisdiction and their associated freshwater marsh and riparian habitat.

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

YesThe City and its
Environmental
Compliance Consultant
(Helix) have reviewed
allMMRP conditions
and verified compliance
with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance
was verified prior to
commencement of
grading and construction
in the Summer of 2022.

The compliance table is
on file with the City.

California
Department
of Fish and
Game, and
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before approval of
grading or
improvement plans or
any ground disturbing
activities, including
grubbing or clearing,
for any project phase.

Mitigation for the U.S. 50 interchange improvements must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) ofeach applicable project phase with the Caltrans.

Conduct Surveys to ldentify and Map Valley Needlegrass
Grassland; Implement Avoidance and Minimization
Measures or Compensatory Mitigation. The project
applicant(s) ofall project phases shall retain a qualified botanist to conduct preconstruction surveys to determine if valley needlegrass grassland is present on the SPA. This could be done concunently with any special-status plant surveys
conducted on site as special-status plant surveys are floristic in nature, i.e. require that all species encountered be identified, and require preparation of a plant community map. If valley needlegrass grassland is not found on the SPA, the botanist shall document the findings in a letter report to the City of Folsom, and no further mitigation shall be required. Valley needlegrass grassland was not found in any ofthe off-site project elements.

If valley needlegrass grassland is found on the SPA, the location and extent of the community shall be mapped and the acreage of this community type, if any, that would be removed by project implementation shall be calculated. The project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application affecting valley needlegrass grassland shall consult with DFG and the City of Folsom to determine appropriate mitigation for removal of valley needlegrass grassland resulting from project implementation. Mitigation measures shall include one or more of the following components sufficient to achieve no net loss ofvalley needlegrass grassland acreage:
establishment of valley needlegrass grassland within project's open space areas currently characterized by annual grassland, establishment of valley needlegrass grassland off-site, or preservation and enhancement of existing valley needlegrass grassland either on or offthe SPA. The applicant(s) shall compensate for any loss ofvalley needlegrass grassland
resulting from project implementation at a minimum l:l
replacement ratio.
3A.3-4b
(FPASP
ErR/EIS)
7t-20

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

YesThe ownerlapplicant
obtained a Tree Permit
from the Community
Development
Department for the
removal of protected
oak trees that were
impacted by the
grading and
construction ofPhase
3 of the Toll Brothers
at Folsom Ranch
project.

The Tree Permit was
approved prior to
commencement of
grading and
construction in the
Summer of 2022.The
owner/applicant paid
in-lieu fees for the
removal of some trees,
the City approved a
Tree Replacement
Plan for another
portion of the tree that
were removed and
preserved existing oak
trees in El Dorado
County for the
remaining mitigation
for the total number of
protected trees in
accordance with this
condition.

City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before approval of
grading or
improvement plans or
any ground disturbing
activities, including
grubbing or clearing,
for any project phase
containing protected
trees or oak woodland.

Conduct Tree Survey, Prepare and Implement an Oak
Woodland Mitigation Plan, Replace Native Oak Trees
Removedo and Implement Measures to Avoid and Minimize
Indirect Impacts on Oak Trees Retained On Site. The
project applicant(s) shall prepare an oak woodland mitigation and monitoring plan. The project applican($ of all on- and off- site project phases containing oak woodland habitat or
individual trees shall adhere to the requirements described below, which are consistent with those outlined in California Public Resources Code 21083.4. Pursuant to Sacramento
County General Plan policy, the acreage of oak woodland habitat for determining impacts and mitigation requirements was calculated as the oak tree canopy area within stands of oak trees having gteater thanl0% cover plus a 3O-foot-radius buffer measured from the outer edge of the tree canopy. Oak trees located in areas greaterthan 30 feet from stands meeting the greater than l0% tree canopy cover criterion were
considered isolated hees and not part ofthe blue oak woodland community. Mitigation for impacts on isolated oak trees is discussed separately below.
> Preserve approximately 399 acres of existing oak
woodland habitat in the SPA (this acreage is based on the extent of oak woodland habitat as determined from aerial photograph interpretation; however, following completion ofground verification by a qualified arborist, the actual amount of oak woodland present within impact areas could be slightly greater or lesser than the amount calculated from aerial photograph and, therefore, the amount
preserved could also be slightly greater or lesser than 399 acres).
> Create 243 acres of oak woodland habitat in the SPA by planting a combination of blue oak acorns, seedlings, and trees in the following SPA locations:
. Non-wooded areas that are adjacent to or contiguous with the existing oak woodland habitat.
3A.3-5
(TPASP
ErR/ErS)
7l-21

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

The Conservation
Easements within the
Phase 3 portion ofthe
subdivision were fenced
off around their
boundaries in advance of
the commencement of
grading and conshuction
and the City verified
compliance by
inspecting the fence in
advance ofgrading.
. Preserve and passive open space zones throughoutthe
SPA.
. Open space areas that are adjacent to existing oak
woodlands that will be impacted by project grading (i.e' catch slopes).
. Other practical locations within the SPA in or adjacent to open space.
. Oak Woodlands Mitigation Planting Criteria
The following oak woodland mitigation planting criteria shall be used to create oak woodland habitat:
> A minimum of 55 planting sites per acre (with a total of 70 units, as defined below) will mitigate for one acre of oak woodland impacts. A combination of acorns, seedlings,
and various sizes ofcontainer trees (#l container, #5
container, #15 container) or hansplanted hees shall be
incorporated into the planting design. Mitigation acreage that is planted solely with larger oak trees (no acorns) shall have a minimum of 35 planting sites per acre. The units are defined as follows:
. One established acorn equals one unit (acorns will be over planted to maximize potential germination).
' One oak seedling equals one unit.
. One #1 container oak tree equals two units.
. One #5 container oak tree equals three units.
. One #15 container oak tree equals four units.
. One 24-inch boxed oak tree equals six units.
. One transplanted oak tree equals four units per trunk diameter inch (dbh).
. Native non oak species characteristic of oak woodlands shall be included in the mitigation planting plan to
augment overall habitat values. Each non oak tree species shall unit values described above for oak

03/25/2025 Item No.13.
but non oak species shall comprise no more than 10% of
the mitigation plantings.
> Preserve and protect existing off-site oak woodland
habitat. Existing, unprotected oak woodland habitat within Sacramento and El Dorado Counties may be secured and
placed under conservation easement in lieu of onsite
mitigation measures if necessary. The off-site locations would be managed as oak woodland habitat in perpetuity. > Create oak woodlands off site. Plant a combination of blue oak acorns, seedlings, and trees at off-site location(s), if needed to achieve the creation goal of 243 acres of new blue oak woodland habitat. This measure would only be
needed if243 acres ofblue oak woodland could not be
created in the SPA. Off-site creation shall follow the same guidelines as outlined in the Mitigation Planting Criteria for onsite creation. Off-site tree planting shall occur at sites within Sacramento County that should naturally support
blue oak woodland and shall be used to restore former blue oak woodland habitat that has been degraded or removed
through human activities. Restoration shall be designed to result in species composition and densities similar to those in the SPA prior to project development. Planted areas
shall be placed under conservation easement and managed as oak woodland habitat in perpetuity.
> The oak woodland mitigation plan prepared by the project applicant(s) shall include a maintenance and monitoring program for any replacement trees. The program shall
include monitoring and reporting requirements, schedule, and success criteria. Replacement oak trees shall be
maintained and monitored for a minimum of eight years
from the date ofplanting and irrigation shall be provided to planted trees for the first five years after planting. Any replacement trees that die during the monitoring period shall be replaced in sufficient numbers to achieve 80%
survival rate for planted fiees by the end ofthe eight-year maintenance and Dead and trees

03/25/2025 Item No.13.
shall be replaced and monitoring continued until 80%
survivorship is achieved. Security acceptable to the City and sufficient to cover maintenance and monitoring costs for eight years shall be provided to the City Planning
Department. The security will be forfeited if the project applicant or designated responsible party fails to provide maintenance and monitoring and meet the success criteria.

Isolated Oak Tree Mitigation
The project applicant(s) ofall on-site project phases containing oak woodland habitat or isolated trees and the off-site Prairie City Road and Oak Avenue interchange improvements to U.S. 50; Rowberry Drive Overcrossing; and the underground sewer force main shall.develop a map depicting the hee canopy of all oak hees in the survey area and identifuing the acreage of tree canopy that would be preserved and the acreage that would be removed. A tree permit for removal of isolated oak trees (those not located within the delineated boundary of oak woodland habitat) shall be obtained from the City Planning Director. As a condition of the tree removal permit, project applicant(s) shall be required to develop a Planting and Maintenance Agreement.

The City's Tree Preservation Code requires compensatory mitigation and the City and the project applicants have developed aplan, as set forth Section 10 of the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan (attached to this EIR/EIS as Appendix N) specifically to avoid and minimize adverse effects on isolated oak trees from project development and to provide
compensatory mitigation for removal of protected trees in the SPA. In addition to the language contained in the Folsom Plan fuea Specific Plan, the following elements shall be included in a protected tree mitigation plan to be developed by the project applicants and ageed upon by the City:
> Project applicant(s) ofprojects containing isolated oak trees shall retain a certified arborist or registered
professional forester to perform a determinate survey of tree species, size (dbh), condition, and location for all areas ofthe project site proposed for tree removal and
encroachment of The condition of individual

03/25/2025 Item No.13.
trees shall be assessed according to the American Society of Consulting Arborists rating system with the following added explanations:
' 5 = Excellent; No problems - tree has no structural
problems, branches are properly spaced and hee
characteristics are nearly perfect for the species.
. 4 = Good; No apparent problems - tree is in good
condition and no apparent problems from visual
inspection. If potential structural or health problems are tended at this stage, future hazard can be reduced and
more serious health problems can be averted.
. 3 = Fair; Minor problems - There are some minor
structural or health problems that pose no immediate
danger. When the recommended actions in an arborist
report are completed conectly the defect(s) can be
minimized or eliminated.
. 2 = Poor; Major problems - the tree is in poor condition, but the condition could be improved with correct
arboricultural work including, but not limited to: pruning, cabling, bracing, bolting, guying, spraying, mistletoe
removal, vertical mulching, and fertilization. If the
recommended actions are completed conectly, hazardcan
be reduced and the rating can be elevated to a 3. Ifno
action is taken the tree is considered a liability and should be removed.
. | =Hazndous or non conectable condition - the tree is in extremely poor condition and in non-reversible decline.

This rating is assigned to a tree that has structural and/or health problems that no amount of tree care work or effort can change. The issues may or may not be considered a
dangerous situation. The hee may also be infested with a disease or pest(s) that is non-controllable at this time and is causing an unacceptable risk ofspreading the disease or pests(s) to other trees.

03/25/2025 Item No.13.
. 0 = Dead - the tree has no significant signs of life (dead or very close to being dead).

Isolated Oak Tree Mitigation Planting Criteria
> The determination for whether an isolated tree shall be preserved, removed without compensation, or removed
with compensatory mitigation shall be based on the
condition and size of the hee as follows:
. Trees rated 0 or I may be removed with no mitigation. . Trees rated? may be removed at50% of the normal
Folsom Municipal Code mitigation.
' Trees rated 3, 4, andlor 5 may be removed at the normal Folsom Municipal Code mitigation.
. Native isolated oaks measuring 24 inches or greater dbh for a single hunk or 40 inches or more for a multi-trunked tree and rated a 3 to 5 shall be retained, unless retaining wall($ higher than 4 feet tall (from bottom of footing to the top of the wall) would be required to protect the
tree(s) from mass grading of the SPA properties.
' Native oaks measuring between 12 and24 inches dbh and rated a 4 or 5 shall not be removed or mitigated unless wall($ higher than 4 feet tall (from bottom of footing to the top of the wall) would be required to protect the
tree(s) from mass grading of the SPA properties. Trees in this size class but rated2 or 3 shall not be removed unless unreasonable costs to save the tree(s) (greater than the cost of implementing the isolated oak tree mitigation
planting criteria described here) would result.
. Native oaks measuring 5 inches or greater dbh but less than 12 inches dbh shall not be removed unless
unreasonable costs to save the tree(s) (greater than the cost of implementing the isolated oak hee mitigation
planting criteria described here) would result.
. Native oak trees measuring I inch or greater dbh but less than 5 inches dbh may be preserved to receive a Small

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

Tree Preservation Credit (STPC). Any tree that is to be considered for preservation credit shall be evaluated,
included in the arborist report, and shall have been found to be rated a3,4, or a 5. Credits shall only be accepted if the tree protection zone (TPZ) (i.e., the outer edge of the tree canopy drip line) is protected with fencing in the exact manner that 5 inches dbh and greater trees are
protected on a construction site, and the spacing is equal to the proper tree spacing dictated by the Folsom Master Tree List. STPC shall not count if they the fee is in a poor growing space due to its position within the TPZ of another protected tree to be preserved. The City shall
accept the preservation ofnative oak hees in this size
class as credit towards the total removed inches based on the following STPC criteria:
> Folsom Municipal Code requires one of the following be planted as compensation for each diameter inch of
protected tree removed:
. half of a 24-inch box tree;
. one #15 container tree;
. two #5 container trees; or
. $150 in-lieu payment or other fee set by City Council Resolution.
> The Planting and Maintenance Agreement shall include a planting plan, planting and inigation design details, and a weaning schedule for the establishment period. The plan shall include a S-year establishment period for trees and 8 years for planted acoms with an annual monitoring report that includes corrections needed with proposed work plan, and notice of compliance within 90-days of annual
monitoring report. Security in an form acceptable to the City and sufficient to cover maintenance and monitoring costs for eight years shall be provided to the City Planning Department. The security will be forfeited if the project

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

YesThe City and its
Environmental
Compliance Consultant
(Helix) have reviewed
allMMRP conditions
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before approval of
grading or
improvement plans or
any ground disturbing
activities, including
applicant or designated responsible parly fails to fulfillthe Planting and Maintenance Agreement.
> To avoid and minimize indirect impacts on protected trees to remain on the SPA, the project applicant(s) of all
affected project phases shall install high visibility fencing outside the outer edge ofthe drip lines ofall trees to be retained on the SPA during project construction. The
fencing may be installed around groups or stands of trees or whole wooded areas bust must be installed so that the drip lines ofall trees are protected. Grading, trenching, equipment or materials storage, parking, paving, inigation, and landscaping shall be prohibited within the fenced areas (i.e. drip lines ofprotected trees). Ifthe activities listed cannot be avoided within the drip line of a particular tree, that tree shall be counted as an affected tree and
compensatory mitigation shall be provided, or the tree in question shall be monitored for a period of five years and replaced only if the tree appears to be dead or dying within five years of project implementation.

Through a combination of the mitigation options presented above along with the proposed on-site preservation ofblue oak woodland habitat in the open space areas, the project
applicant(s) can satisfy the mitigation requirements for removal of trees protected under the Folsom Municipal Code while also mitigating the impacts on oak woodland habitat, as determined through consultation with the Sacramento County Planning Department (for County off-site impacts only) and/or the City of Folsom.

Mitigation for the U.S. 50 interchange improvements must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) ofeach applicable project phase with Caltrans.

Conduct Environmental Awareness Training for
Construction Employees.

Prior to beginning construction activities, the Project Applicant shall employ a qualified biologist to develop and conduct environmental awareness training for construction employees. ws-1
(Addendum
)
7t-22

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

Yes
and verified compliance
with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance
was verified prior to
commencement of
grading and construction
in the Summer of 2022.

The compliance table is
on file with the City.

The City and its
Environmental
Compliance Consultant
(Helix) have reviewed
all MMRP conditions
and verified compliance
with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance
was verified prior to
commencement of
grading and construction
in the Summer of 2022.

The compliance table is
on file with the City.

California
Department
of Fish and
Game, and
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
grubbing or clearing,
for any project phase.

Before approval of
grading or
improvement plans or
any ground disturbing
activities, including
grubbing or clearing,
within suitable tadpole
habitat.

The training shall describe the importance of onsite biological resources, including special-status wildlife habitats; potential nests of special-status birds; and roosting habitat for special- status bats. The biologist shall also explain the importance of other responsibilities related to the protection of wildlife during construction such as inspecting open trenches and looking under vehicles and machinery prior to moving them to ensure there are no lizards, snakes, small mammals, or other wildlife that could become trapped, injured, or killed in construction areas or under equipment.

The environmental awareness program shall be provided to all construction personnel to briefthem on the life history of special-status species in or adjacent to the project area, the need to avoid impacts on sensitive biological resources, any terms and conditions required by State and federal agencies, and the penalties for not complying with biological mitigation
requirements. Ifnew construction personnel are added to the project, the contractor's superintendent shall ensure that the personnel receive the mandatory training before starting work.

An environmental awareness handout that describes and
illustrates sensitive resources to be avoided during project construction and identifies all relevant permit conditions shall be provided to each person.

Conduct Preconstruction Western Spadefoot Survey.

The Project Applicant(s) shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct a preconstruction western spadefoot survey within 48 hours of the initiation of construction activity within suitable tadpole habitat (e.g., vernal pools, seasonal wetlands, and drainages with standing water) for western spadefoot. If no westem spadefoot individuals are found during the
preconstruction survey, the biologist shall document the findings in a letter report to CDFW and the City, and no further mitigation shall be required. If western spadefoot individuals are found, the qualified biologist shall consult with CDFW to determine appropriate avoidance measures.
ws-2
(Addendum
)
7t-23

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

Yes
Yes
Yes
The City and its
Environmental
Compliance Consultant
(Helix) have reviewed
allMMRP conditions
and verified compliance
with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance
was verified prior to
commencement of
grading and construction
in the Summer of 2022.

The compliance table is
on file with the City.

On June 10,2019, the
US Army Corps of
Engineers, in
consultation with the
the hibes
The City and its
Environmental
Compliance Consultant
(Helix) have reviewed
all MMRP conditions
and verified compliance
with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance
was verified prior to
commencement of
grading and construction
in the Summer of 2022.

The compliance table is
on file with the City.

California
Department
of Fish and
Game, and
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
California
Department
of Fish and
Game, and
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before approval of
grading or
improvement plans or
any ground disturbing
activities, including
grubbing or clearing,
for any project phase.

During all construction
phases
Before approval of
gading or
improvement plans or
any ground disturbing
activities, including
grubbing or clearing,
within suitable
northwestern pond
turtle habitat.

Preconstruction Nesting Bird Survey.

The Project Applicant shall conduct a preconstruction nesting bird survey of all areas associated with construction activities on the project site within 14 days prior to commencement of construction during the nesting season (1 February through 3 I August).

Ifactive nests are found, a no-disturbance buffer around the nest shall be established. The buffer distance shall be established by a qualified biologist in consultation with CDFW The buffer shall be maintained until the fledglings are capable of flight and become independent of the nest, to be determined by a qualified biologist. Once the young are independent of the nest, no further measures are necessary. Pre-construction nesting surveys are not required for construction activity outside ofthe nesting season.

Comply with the Programmatic Agreement.

The PA for the project is incorporated by reference. The PA provides a management framework for identifring historic properties, determining adverse effects, and resolving those Conduct Preconstruction Northwestern Pond Turtle
Survey.

The Project Applicant($ shallretain a qualified biologist to conduct a preconstruction northwestern pond turtle survey within 48 hours of the initiation of construction activity within suitable habitat for northwestern pond turtle. If no northwestern pond turtles are found during the preconstruction survey, the biologist shall document the findings in a letter report to CDFW and the City, and no further mitigation shall be
required. If northwestern pond turtles are found, the qualified biologist shall capture and relocate the turtles to a suitable preserved location in the vicinity ofthe project.

NB-1
(Addendum
)

3.4-Ala
(Addendum)
NWPT.1
(Addendum
)
7l-25
C,rtt,rr
7l:26
7t-24
Cultural and Tribal Cultural Resources

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

Yes
and consulting parties
determined that the
entire Toll Brothers at
Folsom Ranch Regency
project has satisfied its
pre-construction
compliance requirements
for cultural resources
and may proceed with
construction. All
required compliance
letters are on file with
the Community
Development
Department.

On June 10, 2019, the
US Army Corps of
Engineers, in
consultation with the
City, SHPO, the tribes
and consulting parties
determined that the
entire Toll Brothers at
Folsom Ranch Regency
project has satisfied its
pre-construction
compliance requirements
for cultural resources
and may proceed with
construction. All
required compliance
letters are on file with
the Community
Development
Department.

U.S. Army
Corp of
Engineers;
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before approval of
grading or
improvement plans or
any ground disturbing
activities, including
grubbing or clearing,
for any project phase.
adverse effects as required under Section 106 ofthe National Historic Preservation Act. This document is incorporated by reference. The PA is available for public inspection and review at the California Office of Historic Preservation 1725 23td Street Sacramento, CA 95816.

Perform an Inventory and Evaluation of Cultural
Resources for the California Register of Historic Places, Minimize or Avoid Damage or Destruction, and Perform
Treatment Where Damage or Destruction Cannot be
Avoided.

These steps may be combined with deliverables and
management steps performed for Section 106 provided that management documents prepared for the PA also clearly
reference the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) listing criteria and significance thresholds that apply under CEQA. Prior to ground disturbing work for each
individual development phase or off-site element, the
applicable oversight agency (City of Folsom, El Dorado
County, Sacramento County, or Caltrans), or the project applicant(s) ofall project phases, with applicable oversight agency, shall perform the following actions:
> The project applicant shall retain the services ofa qualified archaeologist to perform an inventory ofcultural resources within each individual development phase or off-site
element subject to approval under CEQA. Identified
resources shall be evaluated for listing on the CRHR. The shall also locations that are
3A"Alb
(Addendum)
7t-27

03/25/2025 Item No.13.
sensitive for undiscovered cultural resources based upon the location of known resources, geomorphology, and
topography. The inventory report shall specifu the location of monitoring of ground-disturbing work in these areas by a qualified archaeologist and monitoring in the vicinity of identified resources that may be damaged by construction, ifappropriate.
> The identification ofany sensitive locations subjectto monitoring during construction of each individual
development phase shall be performed in concert with
monitoring activities performed under the PA to minimize the potential for conflicting requirements.
> For each resource that is determined eligible for the CRHR, the applicable agency or the project applican($
for any particular discretionary development (under the agency's direction) shall obtain the services ofa qualified archaeologist who shall determine if implementation of the individual project development would result in damage or destruction of "significant" (under CEQA) cultural
resources. These findings shall be reviewed by the
applicable agency for consistency with the significance thresholds and heatment measures provided in this
EIR/EIS.
> Where possible, the project shall be configured or
redesigned to avoid impacts on eligible or listed resources.

Alternatively, these resources may be preserved in place if possible, as suggested under California Public Resources Code Section 21083.2. Avoidance of historic properties is required under certain circumstances under the Public
Resource Code and 36 CFR Part 800.
> Where impacts cannot be avoided, the applicable agency or the project applicant($ ofall project phases (under the applicable agency's direction) shall prepare and implement treatment measures that are determined to be necessary by a qualified archaeologist. These measures may consist of

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

YesOn June 10, 2019, the
US Army Corps of
Engineers, in
consultation with the
City, SHPO, the tribes
and consulting parties
determined that the
entire Toll Brothers at
Folsom Ranch Regency
project has satisfied its
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department;
U.S. Army
Corp of
Engineers
Before approval of
grading or
improvement plans or
any ground disturbing
activities, including
grubbing or clearing,
for any project phase.
data recovery excavations for resources that are eligible for listing because of the data they contain (which may
contribute to research). Alternatively, for historical
architectural, engineered, or landscape features, treatment measures may consist of a preparation of interpretive,
nanative, or photographic documentation. These measures shall be reviewed by the applicable oversight agency for consistency with the significance thresholds and standards provided in this EIRIEIS.
> To support the evaluation and treatment required under this Mitigation Measure, the archaeologist retained by either the applicable oversight agency or the project applicant($ ofall project phases shall prepare an appropriate
prehistoric and historic context that identifies relevant prehistoric, ethnographic, and historic themes and research questions against which to determine the significance of identifi ed resources and appropriate treatment.
> These steps and documents may be combined with the
phasing of management and documents prepared pursuant
to the FAPA to minimize the potentialfor inconsistency
and duplicative management efforts.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries shall be coordinated by the project applicant($ ofeach applicable project phase with the afflected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., ElDorado and/or
Sacramento Counties, or Caltrans).

Conduct Construction Personnel Education, Conduct On-
Site Monitoring If Requiredo Stop Work if Cultural
Resources are Discovered, fusess the Significance of the Findo and Perform Treatment or Avoidance as Required.

To reduce potential impacts to previously undiscovered culfural resources, the project applicant(s) ofall project phases shall do the following:
> Before the start ofground-disturbing activities, the project applicant(s) ofall project phases shall retain a qualified archaeologist to conduct training for construction workers 3A"$2
(Addendum)
7t-28

03/25/2025 Item No.13.
pre-construction
compliance requirements
for cultural resources
and may proceed with
construction. All
required compliance
letters are on file with
the Community
Development
Department. Compliance
with this condition is
monitored through
construction inspection.
as necessary based upon the sensitivity of the project APE, to educate them about the possibility ofencountering
buried cultural resources and inform them ofthe proper
procedures should cultural resources be encountered.
> As a result of the work conducted for Mitigation Measures 3A.5-la and 3A.5-lb, if the alchaeologist determines that any portion of the SPA or the off-site elements should be monitored for potential discovery of as-yet-unknown
cultural resources, the project applicant(s) ofall project phases shall implement such monitoring in the locations specified by the archaeologist. USACE should review and approve any recommendations by archaeologists with
respect to monitoring.
> Should any cultural resources, such as shuctural features, unusual amounts ofbone or shell, artifacts, or architectural remains be encountered during any construction activities, work shall be suspended in the vicinity of the find and the appropriate oversight agency(ies) (identified below) shall be notified immediately. The appropriate oversight
agency(ies) shall retain a qualified archaeologist who shall conduct a field investigation ofthe specific site and shall assess the significance ofthe find by evaluating the
resource for eligibility for listing on the CRHR and the NRHP. If the resource is eligible for listing on the CRHR or NRHP and it would be subject to disturbance or
destruction, the actions required in Mitigation Measures 3A.5-1a and 3A.5-1b shall be implemented. The oversight agency shall be responsible for approval of recommended mitigation if it is determined to be feasible in light of the approved land uses and shall implement the approved
mitigation before resuming construction activities at the archaeological site.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the sect ofeach le with the

03/25/2025 Item No.13.
affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or
Sacramento Counties, or Caltrans).

The project applicant, in coordination with USACE, shall ensure that anarchaeological sensitivity training program is developed and implemented during a pre-construction meeting for
conshuction supervisors. The sensitivity faining program shall provide information about notification procedures when potential archaeological material is discovered, procedures for
coordination between construction personnel and monitoring personnel, and information about other heatment or issues that may arise if culturalresources (including human remains) are discovered during project construction. This protocol shall be communicated to all new construction personnel during
orientation and on a poster that is placed in a visible location inside the conshuction job trailer. The phone number of the USACE culturalresources staffmember shall also be included' The on-site sensitivity training shall be canied out each time a new contractor will begin work in the APE and at the beginning ofeach construction season by each conhactor.

If unanticipated discoveries of additional historic properties, defined in 36 CFR 800.16 (1), are made during the construction of the project, the USACE shall ensure that they will be protected by implementing the following measures:
> The Construction Manager, or archaeological monitor, if given the authority to halt construction activities, shall ensure that work in that area is immediately halted within a 100-foot radius ofthe unanticipated discovery until the find is examined by a person meeting the professional
qualifications standards specified in Section 2.2 of
Attachment G of the IIPMP. The Construction Manager, or archaeological monitor, if present, shall notify the USACE within 24 hours of the discovery.
> The USACE shall notify the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) within one working day of an
unanticipated discovery and may initiate interim treatment measures in accordance with this HPTP. Once the USACE

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

YesThere have been no
human remains
discovered during the
course ofgrading and
construction in the
project.

Sacramento
County
Coroner;
Native
American
Heritage
Commission;
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
During all ground
disturbing activities,
for any project phase.
makes a formal determination of eligibility for the
resource, the USACE will notifo the SHPO within 48
hours of the determination and afford the SHPO an
opportunity to comment on appropriate treatment. The
SHPO shall respond withinT2 hours of the request to
consult. Failure of the SHPO to respond within 72 hours shall not prohibit the USACE from implementing the
treatment measures.

The project applicants shall be required to submit to the City proof of compliance in the form of a completed training roster and copy of training materials.

Suspend Ground-Disturbing Activities if Iluman Remains are Encountered and Complywith CaliforniaHealth and Safety
Code Procedures.

In accordance with the Califomia Health and Safety Code, if human remains are uncovered during ground-disturbing
activities, including those associated with off-site elements, flre project applicant(s) of all project phases shall immediately halt all ground-disturbing activities in the area of the find and notify the Sacramento County Coroner and a professional
archaeologist skilled in osteological analysis to determine the nature of the remains. The coroner is required to examine all discoveries of human remains within 48 hours of receiving notice of a discovery on private or public lands (California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5[b]). If the coroner determines that the remains are those of a Native American, he or she must contact the NAHC by phone within 24 hours of making that determination (California Health and Safety Code Section 7050[c]).

After the coroner's findings are complete, the project
applican(s), an archaeologist, and the NAHC-designated Most Likely Descendant shall determine the ultimate treatment and disposition ofthe remains and take appropriate steps to ensure that additional human interments are not disturbed. The responsibilities for acting on notification ofa discovery of Native American human remains are identified in Section 5097 .9 of the California Public Resources Code.
34"43
(Addendum)
7l-29

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

Upon the discovery of Native American remains, the
procedures above regarding involvement ofthe applicable county coroner, notification of the NAHC, and identification of an Most Likely Descendant shall be followed. The project applican(s) ofall project phases shall ensure that the
immediate vicinity (according to generally accepted cultural or archaeological standards and practices) is not damaged or disturbed by further development activity until consultation with the Most Likely Descendant has taken place. The Most Likely Descendant shall have 48 hours after being granted access to the site to inspect the site and make
recommendations. A range of possible treatments for the remains may be discussed: nondestructive removal and
analysis, preservation in place, relinquishment of the remains and associated items to the descendants, or other culturally appropriate heatment. As suggested by AB 2641(Chapter 863, Statutes of2006), the concerned parties may extend discussions beyond the initial 48 hours to allow for the discovery of additional remains. AB 2641(e) includes a list of site protection measures and states that the project applicant(s) shall comply with one or more of the following requirements:
> record the site with the NAHC or the appropriate
Information Center,
> use an open-space or conservation zoning designation or easement, or
> record a reinternment document with the county.

The project applican(s) or its authorized representative ofall project phases shall rebury the Native American human
remains and associated grave goods with appropriate dignity on the property in a location not subject to further subsurface disturbance if the NAHC is unable to identify an Most Likely Descendant or if the Most Likely Descendant fails to make a recommendation within 48 hours after being granted access to the site. The project applicant(s) or its authorized representative may also reinter the remains in a location not subject to further disturbance if it rejects the recommendation of the Most Likely Descendant and mediation by the NAHC fails to provide

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

YesThe owner/applicant has
provided Geotechnical
Report to the City. The
Geotechnical report for
the subdivision is on file
with the City.

City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before issuance of
building permits and
ground-disturbing
activities.

Prepare Site-Specific Geotechnical Report per CBC
Requirements and Implement Appropriate Recommendations.

Before building permits are issued and construction activities begin any project development phase, the project applicant(s) ofeach project phase shall hire a licensed geotechnical engineer to prepare a final geotechnical subsurface
investigation report for the on- and off-site facilities, which shall be submitted for review and approval to the appropriate City or county department (identified below). The final geotechnical engineeling report shall address and make
recommendations on the following:
> site preparation;
> soil bearing capacity;
> appropriate sources andtypesoffill;
> potential need for soil amendments;
> road, pavement, and parking areas;
> structuralfoundations, includingretaining-wall design; > grading practices;
> soil conosion ofconcrete and steel;
> erosion/winterization;
> seismic ground shaking;
> liquefaction; and
measures acceptable to the landowner. Ground disturbance in the zone of suspended activity shall not recommence without authorization from the archaeologist.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) ofeach applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or
Sacramento Counties, or Caltrans).

The project applicants shall be required to submit to the City proof of compliance in the form of a completed haining roster and copy of training materials.

34.7-ta
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
7t-30
Geolory and Soils

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

Yes
Yes
Compliance with this
condition has been
monitored through
construction inspection
by the City.

Compliance with this
condition has been
monitored through
construction inspection
by the City.

City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before issuance of
building permits and
ground-disturbing
activities.

Before the start of
conshuction activities
> expansive/unstablesoils.

In addition to the recommendations for the conditions listed above, the geotechnical investigation shall include subsurface testing of soil and groundwater conditions, and shall determine appropriate foundation designs that are consistent with the version of the CBC that is applicable at the time building and grading permits are applied for. All recommendations
contained in the final geotechnical engineering report shall be implemented by the project applicant(s) of each project phase.

Special recommendations contained in the geotechnical
engineering report shall be noted on the grading plans and implemented as appropriate before construction begins. Design and construction of all new project development shall be in accordance with the CBC. The project applicant(s) shall provide for engineering inspection and certification that earthwork has been performed in conformity with
recommendations contained in the geotechnical report.

Monitor Earthwork during Earthmoving Activities. All
earthwork shall be monitored by a qualified geotechnical or soils engineer retained by the project applicant(s) ofeach project phase. The geotechnical or soils engineer shall provide oversight during all excavation, placement of fill, and disposal of materials removed from and deposited on both on- and off- site construction areas.

Mitigation for the offl-site elements outside of the City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant($ of each applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or
Sacramento Counties, or Caltrans).

Prepare and Implement the Appropriate Grading and
Erosion Control Plan. Before grading permits are issued, the project applicant(s) ofeach project phase that would be located within the City of Folsom shall retain a California Registered Civil Engineer to prepare a grading and erosion control plan' The grading and erosion control plan shallbe submitted to the City Public Works Department before issuance of grading permits for allnew development. The shall be consistent 3A.7-1b
(TPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.7-3
(TPASP
ErR/ErS)
7l-31
7l-32

03/25/2025 Item No.13.
with the City's Grading Ordinance, the City's Hillside
Development Guidelines, and the state's NPDES permit, and shall include the site-specific grading associated with development for all project phases.

For the two off-site roadways into El Dorado Hills, the project applicant(s) ofthat phase shall retain a California Registered Civil Engineer to prepare a grading and erosion control plan.

The grading and erosion control plan shall be submitted to the El Dorado County Public Works Department and the El Dorado Hills Community Service District before issuance of grading permits for roadway conshuction in El Dorado Hills. The plan shall be consistent with El Dorado County's Grading, Erosion, and Sediment Control Ordinance and the state's NPDES
permit, and shall include the site-specific grading associated with roadway development.

For the off-site detention basin west of Prairie City Road, the project applicant(s) ofthat phase shall retain a California Registered Civil Engineer to prepare a grading and erosion control plan. The grading and erosion conhol plan shall be submitted to the Sacramento County Public Works Department before issuance of a grading permit. The plan shall be
consistent with Sacramento County's Grading, Erosion, and Sediment Control Ordinance and the state's NPDES permit, and shall include the site-specific grading associated with construction of the detention basin.

The plans referenced above shall include the location,
implementation schedule, and maintenance schedule of all erosion and sediment control measures, a description of measures designed to control dust and stabilize the
construction-site road and entrance, and a description ofthe location and methods of storage and disposal of construction materials. Erosion and sediment control measures could include the use of detention basins, berms, swales, wattles, and silt fencing, and covering or watering ofstockpiled soils to reduce wind erosion. Stabilization on steep slopes could include construction of retaining walls and reseeding with vegetation after construction. Stabilization of construction entrances to minimize trackout control IS achieved

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

Yes
Yes
The Community
Development
Department has
reviewed and all
improvement plans in
the subdivision to verifr
compliance with
mitigation measure.

The City and its
Environmental
Compliance Consultant
(Helix) have reviewed
allMMRP conditions
and verified compliance
with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance
was verified prior to
commencement of
grading and construction
in the Summer of 2020.

The compliance table is
on file with the City.

City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before and during
earthmoving activities.

During earthmoving
activities in the Ione
and Mehrten
Formations.
installing filter fabric and crushed rock to a depth of approximately I foot. The project applicant($ shall ensure that the construction contractor is responsible for securing a source of transportation and deposition of excavated materials.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by ttre project applicant(s) ofeach applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or
Sacramento Counties).

Implementation of Mitigation Measure 3A.9-l (discussed in Section 3A.9, "Hydrology and Water Quality - Land") would also help reduce erosion-related impacts.

Divert Seasonal Water Flows Away from Building
Foundations. The project applicant(s) of all project phases shall either install subdrains (which typically consist of perforated pipe and gravel, sunounded by nonwoven geotextile fabric), or take such other actions as recommended by the geotechnical or civil engineer for the project that would serve to divert seasonal flows caused by surface infiltration, water seepage, and perched water during the winter months away from building foundations.

Conduct Construction Personnel Education, Stop Work if
Paleontological Resources are Discovered, Assess the
Significance of the Find, and Prepare and Implement a
Recovery Plan as Required.

To minimize potential adverse impacts on previously unknown potentially unique, scientifically important paleontological resources, the project applicant(s) ofall project phases where construction would occur in the Ione and Mehrten Formations shall do the following:
> Before the start of any earthmoving activities for any project phase in the Ione or Mehrten Formations, the
project applicant($ shall retain a qualified paleontologist or archaeologist to train all conshuction personnel
involved with earthmoving activities, including the site superintendent, regarding the possibiliW of encountering 3A.7-5
(TPASP
ErR/EIS)
3A.7-10
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
7t-33
7t-34

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

YesThe City and its
Environmental
Compliance Consultant
(Helix) have reviewed
allMMRP conditions
and verified compliance
with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance
was verified prior to
commencement of
grading and construction
in the Summer of 2022.

City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before approval of
small-lot final maps
and building permits
for all discretionary
development project,
including all on- and
off-site elements and
implementation
throughout project
construction.

Implement Additional Measures to Control
Generated GIIG Emissions.

To further reduce constructiolr-generated GHG emissions, the project applicant(s) any particular discretionary development application shall implement all feasible measures for reducing GHG emissions associated with construction that are
recommended by SMAQMD at the time individual portions of the site undergo construction. Such measures may reduce GHG exhaust emissions from the use of on-site equipment, worker commute hips, and truck trips carrying materials and
equipment to and ftom the SPA, as well as GHG emissions embodied in the materials selected for construction
Construction-
e
fossils, the appearance and types offossils likely to be seen during construction, and proper notification procedures should fossils be encountered.
> Ifpaleontological resources are discovered during
earthmoving activities, the construction crew shall
immediately cease work in the vicinity of the find and
notify the appropriate lead agency (identified below). The project applicant(s) shall retain a qualified paleontologist to evaluate the resource and prepare a recovery plan in accordance with Society of Vertebrate Paleontology
guidelines (1996). The recovery plan may include, but is not limited to, a field survey, construction monitoring, sampling and data recovery procedures, museum storage
coordination for any specimen recovered, and a report of findings. Recommendations in the recovery plan that are determined by the lead agency to be necessary and feasible shall be implemented before construction activities can resume at the site where the paleontological resources were discovered.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) ofeach applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., Sacramento County)' 3A.4-1
(FPASP
EIR/ErS)
Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Climate Change
7l-35

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

The compliance table is
on file with the City.
concrete). Other measures may pertain to the materials used in construction. Prior to releasing each request for bid to contractors for the construction of each discretionary
development entitlement, the project applican(s) shall obtain the most current list of GHG reduction measures that are recommended by SMAQMD and stipulate that these measures be implemented in the respective request for bid as well as the subsequent construction contract with the selected primary contractor. The project applicant(s) for any pa:ticular discretionary development application may submit to the City and SMAQMD a report that substantiates why specific
measures are considered infeasible for conshuction of that particular development phase andlor at that point in time. The report, including the substantiation for not implementing particular GHG reduction measures, shall be approved by the City, in consultation with SMAQMD prior to the release of a request for bid by the project applicant(s) for seeking a primary contractor to manage the construction of each development project. By requiring that the list of feasible measures be established prior to the selection of a primary contractor, this measure requires that the ability of a contractor to effectively implement the selected GHG reduction measures be inherent to the selection process.

SMAQMD's recommended measures for reducing
construction-related GHG emissions at the time of writing this EIR/EIS are listed below and the project applicant(s) shall, at a minimum, be required to implement the following:
> Improve fuel efficiency from conshuction equipment:
. reduce unnecessary idling (modiff work practices, install auxiliary power for driver comfort);
r perform equipment maintenance (inspections, detect
failures early, conections);
. train equipment operators in proper use of equipment; ' use the proper size ofequipment forthejob; and
r use equipment with new technologies (repowered engines, electric drive trains).

03/25/2025 Item No.13.
> Use alternative fuels for elechicity generators and welders at construction sites such as propane or solar, or use
electrical power.
> Use an ARB-approved low-carbon fuel, such as biodiesel or renewable diesel for construction equipment. (Emissions of oxides of nifogen [NOx] emissions from the use of low carbon fuel must be reviewed and increases mitigated.)
Additional information about low carbon fuels is available from ARB's Low Carbon Fuel Standard Program (ARB
200eb).
> Encourage and provide carpools, shuttle vans, transit passes and/or secure bicycle parking for construction
worker commutes.
> Reduce electricity use in the construction offrce by using compact fluorescent bulbs, powering off computers every day, and replacing heating and cooling units with more
efficient ones.
> Recycle or salvage non-hazardous construction and
demolition debris (goal of at least 75%by weight).
> Use locally sourced or recycled materials for consfuction materials (goal of at least2}Yo based on costs for building materials, and based on volume for roadway, parking lot, sidewalk and curb materials).
> Minimize the amount of concrete used for paved surfaces or use a low carbon concrete option.
> Produce concrete on-site if determined to be less emissive than transporting ready mix.
> Use EPA-certified SmartWay hucks for deliveries and
equipment transport. Additional information about the
SmartWay Transport Partnership Program is available
from ARB's Heavy-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas
Measure (ARB 2009c) and EPA (EPA 2009).

Page93 of 158

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

YesThe owner/applicant
worked with an
organization Urban
Wood Rescue which is a
program in association
with the Sacramento
Tree Foundation that
makes wood products
from large trees that are
removed as a result of
development. The
owner/applicant
provided most of the
large trees that were
removed as a part of the
grading and construction
for the project to Urban
Wood Rescue and they
made table, furniture,
etc. from the trees that
were provided. The
remaining trees and tree
canopy was mulched by
the owner/applicant and
is stored on site to use as
mulch in the landscape
areas throughout the
project. No removed
trees were transported to
the landfill in accordance
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before approval of
final maps and/or
building permits for all
project phases
requiring discretionary
approval, including all
on- and off-site
elements.
> Develop a plan in consultation with SMAQMD to
efficiently use water for adequate dust control. This may consist ofthe use ofnonpotable water from a local source.

In addition to SMAQMD-recommended meunures, construction activity shall comply with all applicable rules and regulations established by SMAQMD and ARB.

Participate in and Implement an Urban and Community
Forestry Program and/or Off-Site Tree Program to Off-Set Loss of On-Site Trees. The trees on the project site contain sequestered carbon and would continue to provide future carbon sequestration during their growing life. For all harvestable trees that are subject to removal, the project applicant($ for any particular discretionary development application shall participate in and provide necessary funding for urban and community forestry program (such as
the UrbanWood program managed by the Urban Forest
Ecosystems Institute [Urban Forest Ecosystems Institute 2009]) to ensure that wood with an equivalent carbon sequestration value to that of all harvestable removed trees is harvested for an end-use that would retain its carbon sequestration (e.g., fumiture building, cabinet making). For all nonharvestable trees that are subject to removal, the project applicant(s) shall develop and fund an off-site tree program that includes a level of tree plantingthat, at a minimum, increases carbon
sequestration by an amount equivalent to what would have been sequestered by the blue oak woodland during its lifetime.

This program shall be funded by the project applicant($ of each development phase and reviewed for comment by an
independent Certified fuborist unaffiliated with the project applicant(s) and shall be coordinated with the requirements of Mitigation Measure 3.3-5, as stated in Section 3A.3,
"Biological Resources - Land." Final approval ofthe program shall be provided by the City. Components of the program may include, but not be limited to, providing urban tree canopy in the City of Folsom, or reforestation in suitable areas outside the City. Reforestation in natural habitat areas outside the City of Folsom would simultaneously mitigate the loss of oak
3A.4-2b
(TPASP
ErR/ErS)
7l-36

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

YesThe subdivision is not
within any identified
area where contaminated
groundwater is present.

Therefore there is no
required Phase I or
Phase 2 Environmental
Assessment required.
with this condition of
approval.

City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before and during
earth moving activities
Complete Investigations Related to the Extent to Which
Soil and/or Groundwater May llave Been Contaminated in
Areas Not Covered by the Phase I and II Environmental
Site Assessments and Implement Required Measures. The
project applicant(s) for any discretionary development
application shall conduct Phase I Environmental Site
Assessments (where an Phase I has not been conducted), and if necessary, Phase II Environmental Site Assessments, and/or other appropriate testing for all areas ofthe SPA and include, as necessary, analysis of soil and/or groundwater samples for the potential contamination sites that have not yet been covered by previous investigations (as shown in Exhibit 3A.8-l) before conshuction activities begin in those areas. Recommendations in the Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments to address any contamination that is found shall be implemented before initiating ground-disturbing activities in these areas.

The project applicant(s) shall implement the following
measures before ground-disturbing activities to reduce health hazards associated with potential exposure to hazardous substances:
> Prepare a plan that identifies any necessary remediation activities appropriate for proposed on- and off-site uses, including excavation and removal of on-site contaminated soils, redistribution of clean fill material in the SPA, and closure of any abandoned mine shafts. The plan shall
include measures that ensure the safe and
woodland habitat while planting trees within the urban forest canopy would not. The California Urban Forestry Greenhouse Gas Reporting Protocol shall be used to assess this mitigation program (CCAR 2008). All unused vegetation and tree material shall be mulched for use in landscaping on the project site, shipped to the nearest composting facility, or shipped to a landfill that is equipped with a methane collection system, or combusted in a biomass power plant. Tree and vegetative material should not be burned on- or off-site unless used as fuel in a biomass power plant.
3A.8-2
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
7t-37
Hazards and Hazardous Materials

03/25/2025 Item No.13.
disposal of contaminated soil and building debris removed from the site. In the event that contaminated groundwater is encountered during site excavation activities, the
contractor shall report the contamination to the appropriate regulatory agencies, dewater the excavated area, and heat the contaminated groundwater to remove contaminants
before discharge into the sanitary sewer system. The
project applicant(s) shall be required to comply with the plan and applicable Federal, state, and local laws. The plan shall outline measures for specific handling and reporting procedures for hazardous materials and disposal of
hazardous materials removed from the site at an
appropriate off-site disposal facility.
> Notify the appropriate Federal, state, and local agencies if evidence ofpreviously undiscovered soil or groundwater
contamination (e.g., stained soil, odorous groundwater) is encountered during construction activities. Any
contaminated areas shallbe remediated in accordance with recommendations made by the Sacramento County
Environmental Management Department, Central Valley
RWQCB, DTSC, and/or other appropriate Federal, state,
or local regulatory agencies.
> Obtain an assessment conducted by PG&E and SMUD
pertaining to the contents of any existing pole-mounted transformers located in the SPA. The assessment shall
determine whether existing on-site elechical transformers contain PCBs and whether there are any records of spills from such equipment. If equipment containing PCB is
identified, the maintenance and/or disposal of the
transformer shall be subject to the regulations of the Toxic Substances Control Act under the authority of the
Sacramento County Environmental Health Department.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) ofeach applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., Sacramento County).

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

Yes
Yes
There are no overhead
powerlines existing
within this subdivision
and all proposed and
future utility lines to
serve this subdivision
will be placed
underground in
accordance with the
subdivision's conditions
of approval.

The City and its
Environmental
Compliance Consultant
(Helix) have reviewed
all MMRP conditions
and verified compliance
with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance
was verified prior to
commencement of
grading and construction
in the Summer of 2022.

The compliance table is
on file with the City.

City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
At the submission of
tentative map
applications.

Before issuance of
grading permits for the
proj ect water features.

Prudent Avoidance and Notification of EMF Exposure.

Potential purchasers ofresidential properties near the
transmission lines shall be made aware of the controversy surrounding EMF exposure. The California Department of Real Estate shall be requested to insert an appropriate notification into the applicant's final Subdivision Public Report application, which shall be provided to purchasers of properties within 100 feet from the 100-115kV power line , or within 150 feet from the220-230 kV power line . The notification would include a discussion ofthe scientific studies and conclusions reached to date, acknowledge that the notification distance is not based on specific biological evidence, but rather, the distance where background levels may increase, and provide that, given some uncertainty in the data, this notification is merely provided to allow purchasers to make an informed decision.

Prepare and Implement a Vector Control Plan in
Consultation with the Sacramento-Yolo Mosquito and
Vector Control District. To ensure that operation and design of the stormwater system, including multiple planned detention basins, is consistent with the recommendations of the
Sacramento-Yolo Mosquito and Vector Control District
regarding mosquito control, the project applicant(s) ofall project phases shallprepare and implement a Vector Control Plan. This plan shall be prepared in coordination with the Sacramento-Yolo Mosquito and Vector Control District and shall be submitted to the City for approval before issuance of the grading permit for the detention basins under the City'sjurisdiction. For the off-site detention basin, the plan shallbe submitted to Sacramento County for approval before issuance ofthe grading permit for the off-site detention basin. The plan shall incorporate specific measures deemed sufficient by the City to minimize public health risks from mosquitoes, and as contained within the Sacramento-Yolo Mosquito and Vector Control Dishict BMP Manual (Sacramento-Yolo Mosquito and Vector Conhol District 2008). The plan shall include, but is not limited to, the following components:
> Description ofthe project.
3A.8-6
(FPASP
ErR/EIS)
3A.8-7
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
71-38
7t-39

03/25/2025 Item No.13.
> Description of detention basins and all water features and facilities that would control on-site water levels.
> Goals of the plan.
> Description of the water management elements and
features that would be implemented, including:
. BMPs that would implemented on-site;
. public education and awareness;
r sanitary methods used (e.g., disposal of garbage);
. mosquito control methods used (e.g., fluctuating water levels, biological agents, pesticides, larvacides, circulating water);and
. stormwater management (consistent with Stormwater
Management Plan).
> Long-term maintenance of the detention basins and all related facilities (e.g., specific ongoing enforceable
conditions or maintenance by a homeowner's association).

To reduce the potential for mosquitoes to reproduce in the detention basins, the project applicant($ shall coordinate with the Sacramento-Yolo Mosquito and Vector Control District to identiff and implement BMPs based on their potential
effectiveness for SPA conditions. PotentialBMPs could
include, but are not limited to, the following:
> build shoreline perimeters as steep and uniform as
practicable to discourage dense plant growth;
> perform routine maintenance to reduce emergent plant
densities to facilitate the ability of mosquito predators (i.e., fish) to move throughout vegetated area;
> design distribution piping and containment basins with adequate slopes to drain fully and prevent standing water.

The design slope should take into consideration buildup of sediment between maintenance periods. Compaction
during grading may also be needed to avoid slumping and settling;

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

YesThe Owner/applicant has
received a NPDES
permit from the State
RegionalWater Quality
Control Board
(SRWQCB). rhe
NDES Permit requires
the implementation of
BMP's, monitoring and
reporting for stormwater
runoff. The NPDES
Permit includes a Storm
Water Pollution
Prevention Plan
(SWPPP), which
outlines monitoring
standards, frequency and
baseline modeling. The
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Submittal of the State
Construction General
PermitNOI and
SWPPP (where
applicable) and
development and
submittal of any other
locally required plans
and specifications
before the issuance of
grading permits for all
on-site project phases
and off-site elements
and implementation
throughout project
construction.

Acquire Appropriate Regulatory Permits and Prepare and
Implement SWPPP and BMPs. Prior to the issuance of
grading permits, the project applicant(s) ofall projects disturbing one or more acres (including phased construction of srnaller areas which are part of a larger project) shall obtain coverage under the SWRCB's NPDES stormwater permit for
general construction activity (Order 2009-0009-DWQ),
including preparation and submittal of a project-specific SWPPP at the time the NOI is filed. The project applicant(s) shall also prepare and submit any other necessary erosion and sediment control and engineering plans and specifications for pollution prevention and control to Sacramento County, City of Folsom, El Dorado County (for the off-site roadways into El Dorado Hills under the Proposed Project Alternative). The SWPPP and other appropriate plans shall identifu and specify:
> the use of an effective combination of robust erosion and sediment control BMPs and construction techniques
for use in thethe local
> coordinate cleaning ofcatch basins, drop inlets, or storm drains with mosquito treatment operations;
> enforce the prompt removal of silt screens installed during construction when no longer needed to protect water
quality;
> if the sump, vault, or basin is sealed against mosquitoes, with the exception of the inlet and outlet, submerge the inlet and outlet completely to reduce the available surface area of water for mosquito egg-laying (female mosquitoes can fly through pipes); and
> design structures with the appropriate pumping, piping, valves, or other necessary equipment to allow for easy
dewatering of the unit if necessary (Sacramento Yolo
Mosquito and Vector Control District 2008).

The project applicant(s) ofthe project phase containing the off- site detention basin shall coordinate mitigation for the off-site with the affected oversight agency (i.e., Sacramento County). 3A.9-1
(FPASP
ErR/EIS)
Hydrolory and Water Quality
7l-40

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

Owner/applicant has
submitted monthly
reports to the City and
sRwQCB.
areaatthe time of construction, that shall reduce the
potential for runoff and the release, mobilization, and exposure ofpollutants, including legacy sources of
mercury from project-related construction sites. These may include but would not be limited to temporary erosion
control and soil stabilization measures, sedimentation
ponds, inlet protection, perforated riser pipes, check dams, and silt fences
> the implementation of approved local plans, non-
stormwater management controls, permanent post-
construction BMPs, and inspection and maintenance
responsibilities;
that could be present in stormwater drainage and
nonstormwater discharges, including fuels, lubricants, and other types of materials used for equipment operation;
> spill prevention and contingency measures, including
measures to prevent or clean up spills of hazardous waste and of hazardous materials used for equipment operation, and emergency procedures for responding to spills;
> personnel training requirements and procedures that shall be used to ensure that workers are aware of permit
requirements and proper installation methods for BMPs
specified in the SWPPP; and
> the appropriate personnel responsible for supervisory duties related to implementation of the SWPPP.
> Where applicable, BMPs identified in the SWPPP shall be in place throughout all site work and
construction/demolition activities and shall be used in all subsequent site development activities. BMPs may include, but are not limited to, such measures as those listed below. > Implementing temporary erosion and sediment control
measures in disturbed areas to minimize discharge of
sediment into nearby drainage conveyances, in compliance with state and local standards in effect at the time of

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

YesThe Owner/applicant has
received a NPDES
permit from the State
Regional Water Quality
Control Board
(SRWQCB). The
NDES Permit requires
the implementation of
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Departrnent
Before approval of
grading plans and
building permits of all
project phases.
construction. These measures may include silt fences,
staked straw bales or wattles, sediment/silt basins and traps, geofabric, sandbag dikes, and temporary vegetation. > Establishing permanent vegetative cover to reduce erosion in areas disturbed by construction by slowing runoff
velocities, trapping sediment, and enhancing filtration and hanspiration.
> Using drainage swales, ditches, and earth dikes to control erosion and runoffby conveying surface runoffdown
sloping land, intercepting and diverting runoffto a
watercourse or channel, preventing sheet flow over sloped surfaces, preventing runoff accumulation at the base of a grade, and avoiding flood damage along roadways and
facility infrastructure.

A copy of the approved SWPPP shall be maintained and
available at all times on the construction site.

For those areas that would be disturbed as part of the U.S. 50 interchange improvements, Caltrans shall coordinate with the development and implementation of the overall project
SWPPP, or develop and implement its own SWPPP specific to the interchange improvements, to ensure that water quality degradation would be avoided or minimized to the maximum extent practicable.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant($ ofeach applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or
Sacramento Counties, or Caltrans).

Prepare and Submit Final Drainage Plans and Implement
Requirements Contained in Those Plans.

Before the approval of grading plans and building permits, the project applicant(s) ofall project phases shall submit final drainage plans to the City, and to El Dorado County for the off- site roadway connections into El Dorado Hills, demonstrating that off-site upstream runoffwould be appropriately conveyed throush the SPA, and that proiect-related on-site runoff would 3A.9-2
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
7t-41

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

BMP's, monitoring and
reporting for stormwater
runoff. The NPDES
Permit includes a Storm
Water Pollution
Prevention Plan
(SWPPP), which
outlines monitoring
standards, frequency and
baseline modeling. The
Owner/applicant has
submitted monthly
reports to the City and
sRwQCB.
be appropriately contained in detention basins or managed with through other improvements (e.g., source controls, biotechnical stream stabilization) to reduce flooding and hydromodfication impacts.

The plans shall include, but not be limited to, the following items:
> an accurate calculation ofpre-project and post-project runoff scenarios, obtained using appropriate engineering methods, that accurately evaluates potential changes to runoff, including increased surface runoff;
> runoff calculations for the l0-year and 10O-year (0.01 AEP) storm events (and other, smaller storm events as
required) shall be performed and the trunk drainage
pipeline sizes confirmed based on alignments and
detention facility locations finalized in the design phase; > a description ofthe proposed maintenance program for the on-site drainage system;
> project-specific standards for installing drainage systems; > City and El Dorado County flood control design
requirements and measures designed to comply with them; Implementation of stormwater management BMPs that avoid increases in the erosive force of flows beyond a specific range of conditions needed to limit hydromodification and maintain cunent stream geomorphology. These BMPs will be designed and constructed in accordance with the forthcoming SSQP Hydromodification Management Plan (to be adopted by the RWQCB) and may
include, but are not limited to, the following:
> use of Low Impact Development (LID) techniques to limit increases in stormwater runoff at the point of origination (these may include, but are not limited to: surface swales; replacement of conventional impervious surfaces with
pervious surfaces [e.g., porous pavement]; impervious
surfaces disconnection; and hees planted to intercept
stormwater);

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

YesThe Owner/applicant has
received a NPDES
permit from the State
City of
Folsom
Community
Prepare plans before
the issuance ofgrading
permits for all project
> enlarged detention basins to minimize flow changes and changes to flow duration characteristics;
> bioengineered stream stabilization to minimize bank
erosion, utilizing vegetative and rock stabilization, and inset floodplain restoration features that provide for
enhancement of riparian habitat and maintenance of natural hydrologic and channel to floodplain interactions;
> minimize slope differences between any stormwater or
detention facility outfall channel with the existing
receiving channel gradient to reduce flow velocity; and > minimize to the extent possible detention basin, bridge embankment, and other encroachments into the channel
and floodplain conidor, and utilize open bottom box
culverts to allow sediment passage on smaller drainage
courses.

The final drainage plan shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City of Folsom Community Development and Public Works Departments and El Dorado County Department of
Transportation that 100-year (0.01 AEP) flood flows would be appropriately channeled and contained, such that the risk to people or damage to structures within or down gradient of the SPA would not occur, and that hydromodification would not be increased from pre-development levels such that existing stream geomorphology would be changed (the range of
conditions should be calculated for each receiving water if feasible, or a conservative estimate should be used, e.g., an Ep of I +10% or other as approved by the Sacramento Stormwater Quality Partnership and/or City of Folsom Public Works
Department).

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by ilre project applicant(s) ofeach applicable project phase with El Dorado County.

Develop and Implement a BMP and Water Quality
Maintenance Plan. Before approval of the grading permits for any development project requiring a subdivision map, a
3A.9-3
(TPASP
ErR/ErS)
7t-42

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

Regional Water Quality
Control Board
(SRWQCB). The
NDES Permit requires
the implementation of
BMP's, monitoring and
reporting for stormwater
runoff. The NPDES
Permit includes a Storm
Water Pollution
Prevention Plan
(SWPPP), which
outlines monitoring
standards, frequency and
baseline modeling. The
Owner/applicant has
submitted monthly
reports to the City and
sRwQCB.

The owner/applicant has
prepared storm drain
design reports and
provided storm drain
calculations for all ofthe
proposed storm drainage
features and
detention/water quality
and hydromodification
basins necessary to serve
this subdivision. These
reports have been
reviewed and approved
by the Community
Development and Public
Works Departments.

Development
Department
and Public
Works
Department
phases and off-site
elements and
implementation
throughout project
construction.
detailed BMP and water quality maintenance plan shall be prepared by a qualified engineer retained by the project applicant($ the development project. Drafts of the plan shall be submitted to the City of Folsom and El Dorado County for the off-site roadway connections into El Dorado Hills, for review and approval concurrently with development of tentative subdivision maps for allproject phases. The plan shall finalize the water quality improvements and further detailthe structural and nonstructural BMPs proposed for the project. The plan shall include the elements described below.
> A quantitative hydrologic and water quality analysis of proposed conditions incorporating the proposed drainage design features.
> Predevelopment and post development calculations
demonstrating that the proposed water quality BMPs meet or exceed requirements established by the City of Folsom and including details regarding the size, geometry, and functional timing of storage and release pursuant to the "'stormwater Quality Design Manual for Sacramento and
South Placer Regions" (ISSQP 2007b] per NPDES Permit
No. CAS082597 WDR Order No. R5-2008-0l42,page 46)
and El Dorado County's NPDES SWMP (County of El
Dorado 2004).
> Source control programs to control water quality pollutants on the SPA, which may include but are limited to
recycling, street sweeping, storm drain cleaning, household hazardous waste collection, waste minimization,
prevention of spills and illegal dumping, and effective management of public fash collection areas.
> A pond management component for the proposed basins
that shall include management and maintenance
requirements for the design features and BMPs, and
responsible parties for maintenance and funding.
> LID control measures shall be integrated into the BMP and water quality maintenance plan. These may include, but
are not limited to:

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

YesThere are no existing or
proposed dams upsheam
from this subdivision
and therefore there is no
requirement to perform
the analysis required in
this condition of
approval.

City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
Prior to submittalto
the City of tentative
maps or improvement
plans.
. surface swales;
. replacement of conventional impervious surfaces with
pervious surfaces (e.g., porous pavement);
. impervious surfaces disconnection; and
. trees planted to intercept stormwater.

New stormwater facilities shall be placed along the natural drainage courses within the SPA to the extent practicable so as to mimic the natural drainage patterns. The reduction in runoff as a result ofthe LID configurations shall be quantified based on the runoff reduction credit system methodology described in "stormwater Quality Design Manual for the Sacramento and South Placer Regions, Chapter 5 and Appendix D4" (SSQP
2007b) and proposed detention basins and other water quality BMPs shall be sized to handle these runoff volumes.

For those areas that would be disturbed as part of the U.S. 50 interchange improvements, it is anticipated that Caltrans would coordinate with the development and implementation of the overall project SWPPP, or develop and implement its own SWPPP specific to the interchange improvements, to ensure that water quality degradation would be avoided or minimized to the maximum extent practicable.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) ofeach applicable project phase with El Dorado County and Caltrans.

Inspect and Evaluate Existing Dams Within and Upstream
of the Project Site and Make Improvements if Necessary.

Prior to submittal to the City of tentative maps or improvement plans the project applicant(s) ofall project phases shall perform conduct studies to determine the extent of inundation in the case of dam failure. If the studies determine potential exposure of people or shuctures to a significant risk of flooding as a result of the failure of a dam, the applicants(s) shall implement of any feasible recommendations provided in that study, potentially through drainage improvements, subject to the approval of the City of Folsom Public Works Department. 3A.9-4
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
7l-43

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

YesThe owner/applicant has
implemented noise
reducing construction
practices included as part
of the required Noise
ConholPlan.

Compliance with these
requirements has been
monitored through
construction inspection.

City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before and during
conshuction activities
on the SPA and within
ElDorado Hills.

Implement Noise-Reducing Construction Practices, Prepare and Implement a Noise Control Plan, and Monitor and
Record Construction Noise near Sensitive Receptors. To
reduce impacts associated with noise generated during project related construction activities, the project applicant(s) and their primary contractors for engineering design and consfuction of all project phases shall ensure that the following requirements are implemented at each work site in any year of project construction to avoid and minimize construction noise effects on sensitive receptors. The project applicant(s) and primary construction contractor(s) shall employ noise-reducing
construction practices. Measures that shall be used to limit noise shall include the measures listed below:
> Noise-generating construction operations shall be limited to the hours between 7 a.m. and 7 p.m. Monday through
Friday, and between 8 a.m. and 6 p.m. on Saturdays and
Sundays.
> All construction equipment and equipment staging areas shall be located as far as possible from nearby noise-
sensitive land uses.
> All construction equipment shall be properly maintained and equipped with noise-reduction intake and exhaust
mufflers and engine shrouds, in accordance with
manufacturers' recommendations. Equipment engine
shrouds shall be closed during equipment operation.
> All motorized construction equipment shall be shut down when not in use to prevent idling.
> Individual operations and techniques shall be replaced with quieter procedures (e.g., using welding instead of riveting, mixing concrete offsite instead of on-site).
> Noise-reducing enclosures shall be used around stationary noise-generating equipment (e.g., compressors and
lannedas are built out and future noise
3A.11-1
OPASP
ErR/ErS)
Noise and Vibration
7t-44

03/25/2025 Item No.13.
sensitive receptors are located within close proximity to future construction activities.
> Written notification of construction activities shall be provided to all noise-sensitive receptors located within 850 feet of construction activities. Notification shall include anticipated dates and hours during which construction
activities are anticipated to occur and contact information, including a daytime telephone number, for the project
representative to be contacted in the event that noise levels are deemed excessive. Recommendations to assist noise-
sensitive land uses in reducing interior noise levels (e.g., closing windows and doors) shall also be included in the notification.
> To the extent feasible, acoustic barriers (e.g., lead curtains, sound barriers) shall be constructed to reduce construction- generated noise levels at affected noise-sensitive land uses.

The baniers shall be designed to obstruct the line of sight between the noise-sensitive land use and on-site
construction equipment. When installed properly, acoustic barriers can reduce construction noise levels by
approximately 8-10 dB (EPA l97l).
> When future noise sensitive uses axe within close
proximity to prolonged construction noise, noise-
attenuating buffers such as structures, truck trailers, or soil piles shall be located between noise sources and future residences to shield sensitive receptors from conshuction noise.
> The primary contractor shall prepare and implement a
construction noise management plan. This plan shall
identify specific measures to ensure compliance with the noise control measures specified above. The noise control plan shall be submitted to the City of Folsom before any noise-generating construction activity begins. Construction shall not commence until the construction noise
1S the of Folsom.

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

Yes
Yes
Blasting has been
necessary throughout the
course ofgrading and
construction in this
subdivision. The blasting
has not been within 2000
feet ofany sensitive
receptor. The blasting
contractor has obtained a
blasting permit from the
City and the Community
Development
Department has verified
compliance with the
permit through
construction inspection.

The owner/applicant has
implemented noise
reducing construction
practices included as part
of the required Noise
Conhol Plan.

Compliance with these
requirements has been
monitored through
construction inspection.

City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before and during
bulldozing and
blasting activities on
the SPA and within El
Dorado Hills and the
County of Sacramento
Before submittal of
improvement plans for
each project phase,
and during project
operations for testing
of emergency
generators.

Mitigation for the two off-site roadway connections into El Dorado County must be coordinated by the project
applicant(s) of the applicable project phase with El Dorado County, since the roadway extensions are outside of the City of Folsom's jurisdictional boundaries.

Implement Measures to Prevent Exposure of Sensitive
Receptors to Groundborne Noise or Vibration from Project Generated Construction Activities.
> To the extent feasible, blasting activities shall not be conducted within 27 5 feet of existing or future sensitive receptors.
> To the extent feasible, bulldozing activities shall not be conducted within 50 feet of existing or future sensitive receptors.
> All blasting shall be performed by a blast contractor and blasting personnel licensed to operate in the State of
California.
> A blasting plan, including estimates of vibration levels at the residence closest to the blast, shall be submitted to the enforcement agency for review and approval prior to the commencement of the first blast.
> Each blast shall be monitored and documented for
groundbourne noise and vibration levels at the nearest
sensitive land use and associated recorded submitted to the enforcement agency.

Implement Measures to Reduce Noise from Project-
Generated Stationary Sources.

The project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development project shall implement the following measures to reduce the effect ofnoise levels generated by on-site stationary noise sources that would be located within 600 feet of any noise-sensitive receptor:
> Routine testing and preventive maintenance of emergency electrical generators shall be conducted during the less sensitive hours 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 All
3A.11-3
(TPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.11-5
(TPASP
ErR/EIS)
7t-45
7t-46

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

There are no sensitive
receptors within 600 feet
ofany on-going
construction and grading
activity in the
subdivision.
electrical generators shall be equipped with noise control (e.g., muffler) devices in accordance with manufacturers' specifications.

External mechanical equipment associated with buildings shall incorporate features designed to reduce noise
emissions below the stationary noise source criteria. These features may include, but are not limited to, locating
generators within equipment rooms or enclosures that
incorporate noise-reduction features, such as acoustical louvers, and exhaust and intake silencers. Equipment
enclosures shall be oriented so that major openings (i'e., intake louvers, exhaust) are directed away from nearby
noise-sensitive receptors.

Parking lots shall be located and designed so that noise emissions do not exceed the stationary noise source criteria established in this analysis (i.e., 50 dB for 30 minutes in every hour during the daytime l7 a.m. to l0 p.m'l and less than 45 dB for 30 minutes of every hour during the night time [0 p.m. to 7 a.m.]). Reduction of parking lot noise can be achieved by locating parking lots as far away as feasible from noise sensitive land uses, or using buildings and topographic features to provide acoustic shielding for noise-sensitive land uses.

Loading docks shall be located and designed so that noise emissions do not exceed the stationary noise source criteria established in this analysis (i.e., 50 dB for 30 minutes in every hour during the daytime 17 a.m. to 10 p.m.l and less than 45 dB for 30 minutes of every hour during the night time [0 p.m. to 7 a.m.]). Reduction of loading dock noise can be achieved by locating loading docks as far away as possible from noise sensitive land uses, constructing noise barriers between loading docks and noise-sensitive land uses, or using buildings and topographic features to
provide acoustic shielding for noise-sensitive land uses.

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa C ofO
in the appropriate
phase of
development of the
project.

The landscape and
streetscape plans for the
subdivision include the
required masonry walls
in the required height
and required locations.

The Community
Development
Department will monitor
compliance during
conshuction and verify
that the sound walls are
complete prior to
issuance of a Certificate
of Occupancy in the
subdivision.

City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Prior to building
occupancy
Exterior Traffic Noise Reduction Measures
Prior to building occupancy, the project applicant shall design and construct noise baniers, as detailed below, to reduce haffic noise levels below the City of Folsom exterior criteria of 60 dB Ldn.
> 6-foot tall solid noise barriers, relative to backyard elevations, shall be constructed along all property
boundaries adjacent to East Bidwell Street, Mangini
Parkway, and Oak Avenue Parkway.
> For the proposed Traditional Subdivisions portion of the project, a7-foottall solid noise barrier, relative to
backyard elevations, shall be constructed along all property boundaries adjacent to White Rock Road.
> For the proposed Regency at Folsom Ranch Phase I and
Phase 2 portions ofthe project, an 8-foottall solid noise barrier, relative to backyard elevations, shall be
constructed along all property boundaries adjacent to
White Rock Road.

Suitable materials for the traffic noise baniers include masonry and precast concrete panels. The overall banier height may be achieved by utilizing a banier and earthen berm combination.

Other materials may be acceptable but shall be reviewed by an acoustical consultant prior to use.

Barrier height requirements are based on a property boundary setback of ll7-122 feet from the ultimate alignment of White Rock Road under the approved Capital Southeast Connector project. If 90 days prior to pulling building permits for the Toll Brothers site, it is determined that there is no evidence that the White Rock Road improvements are funded and moving
forward, as described under the approved Capital Southeast Connector project, the project applicant shall obtain the services ofa noise consultant to reconduct a site-specific acoustical analysis based on the actual property boundary setback to determine the noise reduction measures

4.13-1
(Addendum
)
7t-47
Page I 10 of 158

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

Yes
Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa C ofO
in the appropriate
phase of
development of the
project.

The Community
Development
Department has
reviewed and
approved all traffic
control plans required
for the construction of
both off-site and on-
site improvements for
this subdivision to
veriff compliance
with City ordinances
and to minimize
delays to the travelling
public.

There are no off-site
elements outside the City
The Community
Development
Department will monitor
compliance during
construction and verif'
that the sound walls are
complete prior to
issuance of a Certificate
of Occupancy in the
subdivision.

City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before the approval of
all relevant plans
and/or permits and
during construction of
all project phases.

Prior to building
occupancy
Prepare and Implement a Construction Traflic Control
Plan. The project applicant($ ofall project phases shall prepare and implement traffic control plans for construction activities that may affect road rights-of-way. The traffic conhol plans must follow any applicable standards of the agency responsible for the affected roadway and must be approved and signed by a professional engineer. Measures typically used in traffic control plans include advertising ofplanned lane closures, warning signage, a flag person to direct traffic flows when needed, and methods to ensure continued access by
emergency vehicles. During project conshuction, access to existing land uses shall be maintained at all times, with detours used as necessary during road closures. Traffic control plans shall be submitted to the appropriate City or County department or the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) for review and approval before the approval ofall project plans or permits, for all project phases where implementation may cause impacts on traffic.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of theboundaries must be coordinatedFolsom's
to reduce traffic noise levels in accordance with adopted City of Folsom noise standards.

Interior Traffic Noise Reduction Measures
Prior to building occupancy, the project applicant shall ensure the following construction design features have been
implemented.
> For the first-row of homes located along White Rock
Road, the west-, south-, and east-facing upper-floor
building facades shall maintain minimum window
assembly STC ratings of 34.
> Mechanical ventilation (air conditioning) shall be provided for all residences in this development to allow the
occupants to close doors and windows as desired to
achieve compliance with the applicable interior noise level criteria.
3A.14-1
(FPASP
ErR/EIS)

4.13-2
(Addendum
)
Public Services
7t-49
7t-48
Page lll of158

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit.
limits for this
subdivision.

The City Fire
Department has
reviewed and approved
all proposed
improvements for the
subdivision. The City FD
will verify adequate fire
flow prior to building
permit issuance in the
subdivision.

City of
Folsom Fire
Department,
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before issuance of
building permits and
issuance ofoccupancy
permits or final
inspections for all
project phases.
project applicant(s) ofeach applicable project phase with the aflected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or
Sacramento Counties and Caltrans).

Incorporate California Fire Code; City of Folsom Fire
Code Requirementsl and EDHFD Requirements, if
Necessary, into Project Design and Submit Project Design to the City of Folsom Fire Department for Review and
Approval. To reduce impacts related to the provision of new fire services, the project applicant(s) ofall project phases shall do the following, as described below.
l. Incorporate into project designs fire flow requirements based on the California Fire Code, Folsom Fire Code (City of Folsom Municipal Code Title 8, Chapter 8.36), and other applicable requirements based on the City of Folsom Fire Department fire prevention standards.

Improvement plans showing the incorporation automatic
sprinkler systems, the availability of adequate fire flow, and the locations of hydrants shall be submitted to the City of Folsom Fire Department for review and approval. In addition, approved plans showing access design shall be provided to the City of Folsom Fire Department as described by Zoning Code Section I 7.5 7.080 ("Vehicular Access Requirements"). These plans shall describe access-road length, dimensions, and finished surfaces for firefighting equipment. The installation of security gates across a fire apparatus access road shall be approved by the Cify of Folsom Fire Department. The design and operation of gates and banicades shall be in accordance with the
Sacramento County Emergency Access Gates and Baniers
Standard, as required by the City of Folsom Fire Code.

2. Submit a Fire Systems New Buildings, Additions, and
Alterations Document SubmittalList to the City of Folsom Community Development Department Building Division for
review and approval before the issuance of building permits.

In addition to the above measures, the project applicant(s) ofall phases shall incorporate the provlsrons described below ofthe SPA within the EDHFD servlce if it
project
for the
3A.14-2
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
71-50
Page I 12 of 158

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

Condition willbe
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit.

The City Fire
Department has
reviewed and approved
all proposed
improvements for the
subdivision. The City FD
will verify adequate fire
flow prior to building
City of
Folsom Fire
Department,
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before issuance of
building permits and
issuance ofoccupancy
permits or final
inspections for all
project phases.
is determined through City/El Dorado County negotiations that EDHFD would serve the 178-acre portion of the SPA.

3. Incorporate into project designs applicable requirements based on the EDHFD fire prevention standards. For
commercial development, improvement plans showing
roadways, land splits, buildings, fire sprinkler systems, fre alarm systems, and other commercial building improvements shallbe submitted to the EDHFD for review and approval. For residential development, improvement plans showing property lines and adjacent streets or roads; total acreage or square footage ofthe parcel; the footprint ofall structures; driveway plan views describing width, len$h, turnouts, turnarounds, radiuses, and surfaces; and driveway profile views showing the percent grade from the access road to the structure and vertical clearance shall be submitted to the EDTIFD for review and approval.

4. Submit a Fire Prevention Plan Checklist to the EDHFD for review and approval before the issuance of building permits. In addition, residential development requiring automation fire sprinklers shall submit sprinkler design sheet(s) and hydraulic calculations from a California State Licensed C-16 Contractor' The City shall not authorize the occupancy ofany structures until the project applicant(s) have obtained a Certificate of Occupancy from the City of Folsom Community Development Department verifying that all fire prevention items have been addressed on-site to the satisfaction of the City of Folsom Fire Department and/or the EDIIFD for the 178-acre area of the SPA within the EDHFD service area.

Incorporate Fire Flow Requirements into Project Designs.

The project applicant(s) ofall project phases shall incorporate into their project designs fire flow requirements based on the California Fire Code, Folsom Fire Code, and/or EDHFD for those areas of the SPA within the EDHFD service area and shall verifu to City of Folsom Fire Department that adequate water flow is
available, prior to approval of improvement plans and issuance ofoccupancy permits or final inspections for all project phases. 3A.14-3
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
7t-51
Page I 13 of 158

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

Traflic and Transportation
Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit.

Condition willbe
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit.
permit issuance in the
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share ofthe
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastrucfure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
A phasing analysis
shall be performed
prior to approval ofthe
first subdivision map
to determine when the
improvement should
be implemented and
when fair share
funding should be
paid.

A phasing analysis
shall be performed
prior to approval ofthe
first subdivision map
to determine when the
improvement should
be implemented and
when fair share
funding should be
paid.

A phasing analysis
shall be performed
prior to approval ofthe
first subdivision map
to determine when the
improvement should
be implemented.

The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the
Construction of Improvements to the Folsom
BoulevardlBlue Ravine Road Intersection (Intersection 1).

To ensure that the Folsom Boulevard/Blue Ravine Road
intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the eastbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of trvo left-turn lanes, one through lane, and one right-turn lane. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the Folsom Boulevard/Blue Ravine Road intersection
(Intersection 1).

The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the
Construction of Improvements at the Sibley Street/Blue
Ravine Road Intersection (Intersection 2). To ensure that the Sibley Street/Blue Ravine Road intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of two left-turn lanes, two through lanes, and one right-turn lane. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the Sibley Street/Blue Ravine Road intersection (lntersection 2).

The Applicant Shall Fund and Construct Improvements to
the Scott Road (West)/White Rock Road Intersection
(Intersection 28). To ensure that the Scott Road (West)/White Rock Road intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, a traffic signal must be installed.
3A.15-1a
(FPASP
ErR/EIS)
3A.15-1b
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.15-1c
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
7t-52
7t-53
7l-54
Page ll4ofl58

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit.

Sauamento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision. .

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
A phasing analysis
shall be performed
prior to approval ofthe
first subdivision map
to determine when the
improvement should
be implemented.

A phasing analysis
shall be performed
prior to approval ofthe
first subdivision map
to determine when the
improvement should
be implemented.

Fund and Construct Improvements to the Hillside
Drive/Xaston Valley Parkway Intersection
(Intersection 41). To ensure that the Hillside Drive/Easton Valley Parkway intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the eastbound approach must be reconfigured to consist ofone dedicated left turn lane and two through lanes, and the westbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of two through lanes and one dedicated right-turn lane. The applicant shall fund and construct these improvements.

Fund and Construct Improvements to the Oak Avenue
Parkway/IVliddle Road Intersection
(Intersection 44). To ensure that the Oak Avenue
Parkway/Middle Road intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, control all movements with a stop sign. The applicant shall fund and construct these improvements.
3A.15-le
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.15-1f
(TPASP
ErR/ErS)
71-55
7l-56
Page I l5 of 158

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share ofthe
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share ofthe
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

Sacramento
County
Public Works
Department
and Caltrans
Sacramento
County
Public Works
Department
A phasing analysis
shallbe performed
prior to approval ofthe
first subdivision map
to determine when the
improvement should
be implemented.

Before project build
out. Design of the
White Rock Road
widening to four lanes,
from Grant Line Road
to Prairie City Road,
with Intersection
improvements has
begun, and because
this widening project
is environmentally
cleared and fully
funded, it's
construction is
expected to be
complete before the
first phase ofthe
Proposed Project or
alternative is built.

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts to the Hazel Avenue/Folsom Boulevard
Intersection (Sacramento County Intersection 2). To ensure that the Hazel Avenue/Folsom Boulevard intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, this intersection must be grade separated including'Jug handle" ramps. No at grade improvement is feasible. Grade separating and extended (south) Hazel Avenue with improvements to the U.S. S}lHazelAvenue interchange is a mitigation measure for the approved Easton-Glenbrough Specific Plan development project. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the Hazel
Avenue/Folsom Boulevard intersection (Sacramento County Intersection 2).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on the Grant Line Road/White Rock Road
Intersection and to White Rock Road widening between the Rancho Cordova City limit to Prairie City Road
(Sacramento County Intersection 3). Improvements must be made to ensure that the Grant Line Road/White Rock Road intersection operates at an acceptable LOS. The currently County proposed White Rock Road widening project will
widen and realign White Rock Road from the Rancho Cordova City limit to the El Dorado County line (this analysis assumes that the Proposed Project and build alternatives will widen White Rock Road to five lanes from Prairie City road to the El Dorado County Line). This widening includes improvements to the Grant Line Road intersection and realigning White Rock Road to be the through movement. The improvements include two eastbound through lanes, one eastbound right turn lane, two northbound left turn lanes, two northbound right turn lanes, two westbound left turn lanes and two westbound through lanes. This improvement also includes the signalization of the White Rock Road and Grant Line Road intersection. With
implementation of this improvement, the intersection would operate at an acceptable LOS A. The applicant shall pay its share of of to the
3A.15-1h
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.15-li
(FPASP
ErR/EIS)
7t-57
71-58

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit.

Condition willbe
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrashucture Fees
Sacramento
County
Public Works
Department
ElDorado
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n
Before project build
out. Construction of
phase two of the Hazel
Avenue widening,
from Madison Avenue
to Cunagh Downs
Drive, is expected to
be completed by year
2013, before the first
phase ofthe Proposed
Project or altemative is
complete. The
applicant shall pay its
proportionate share of
funding of
improvements to the
agency responsible for
improvements, based
on a program
established by that
agency to reduce the
impacts to Hazel
Avenue between
Madison Avenue and
Cunagh Downs Drive
(Sacramento County
Roadway Segment
l0).

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the Grant Line
Road/White Rock Road intersection (Sacramento County
Intersection 3).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on llazel Avenue between Madison Avenue
and Curragh Downs Drive (Roadway Segment 10). To
ensure that Hazel Avenue operates at an acceptable LOS
between Curragh Downs Drive and Gold Country Boulevard, Hazel Avenue must be widened to six lanes. This improvement is part of the County adopted Hazel Avenue widening project.

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on the White Rock Road/Windfield Way
Intersection (El Dorado County Intersection 3). To ensure that the White Rock Road/Windfield Way intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the intersection must be signalized and separate northbound left and right turn lanes must be striped. 3A.1s-lj
(FPASP
ErR/EIS)
3A.15-11
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
7t-59
7t-60
Page I l7 of 158

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit.

Condition willbe
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit.
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
and
Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n
Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n and the City
ofRancho
Cordova
Department
of Public
Works
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

The applicant shall pay its proportionate share offunding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the White Rock Road/Windfield Way intersection (El Dorado County Intersection 3).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on Eastbound U.S. 50 as an alternative to improvements at the Folsom Boulevard/U.S. 50 Eastbound
Ramps Intersection (Caltrans Intersection 4). Congestion on eastbound U.S. 50 is causing vehicles to use Folsom Boulevard as an alternate parallel route until they reach U.S. 50, where they must get back on the freeway due to the lack of a parallel route. It is preferred to alleviate the congestion on U,S. 50 than to upgrade the intersection at the end ofthis reliever route. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share offunding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the Folsom BoulevardAJ.S. 50 Eastbound Ramps intersection (Caltrans Intersection 4). To ensure that the Folsom Boulevard/U.S. 50 eastbound ramps intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, auxiliary lanes should be added to eastbound U.S. 50 from Hazel Avenue to east of Folsom Boulevard. This was recommended in the Traffrc Operations Analysis Report for the U.S. 50 Auxiliary Lane Project.

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on the Grant Line Road/ State Route 16
Intersection (Caltrans Intersection 12). To ensure that the Grant Line Road/State Route 16 intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound and southbound approaches must be reconfigured to consist of one left-turn lane and one shared through/right-turn lane. Protected left-turn signal phasing must be provided on the northbound and southbound approaches. Improvements to the Grant Line Road/State Route l6 intersection are contained within the County Development Fee Program, and are scheduled for Measure A funding.
3A.15-1o
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.15-1p
(FPASP

ETRIEIS)
7l-61
7t-62

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

Condition willbe
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit.
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
Calhans
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
and
Sacramento
County
Department
of
Before project build
out. Construction of
the Sacramento 50
Bus-Carpool Lane and
Community
Enhancements Project
is expected to be
completed by year
2013, before the first
phase ofthe Proposed
Project or alternative is
complete.

Construction of the
Sacramento 50 Bus-
Carpool Lane and
Community
Enhancements Project
has started since the
writing of the Draft
EIS/EIR.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Improvements to this intersection must be implemented by Caltrans, Sacramento County, and the City of Rancho Cordova.

The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the Grant Line Road/State Route 16 intersection (Caltrans Intersection 12).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on Eastbound U.S. 50 between Zinfandel
Drive and Sunrise Boulevard (Freeway Segment 1). To
ensure that Eastbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS between Zinfandel Drive and Sunrise Boulevard, a bus-carpool (HOV) lane must be constructed. This improvement is
currently planned as part of the Sacramento 50 Bus-Carpool Lane and Community Enhancements Project. The applicant
shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to Eastbound U.S. 50 between ZinfandelDrive and Sunrise Boulevard
(Freeway Segment 1).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on Eastbound U.S. 50 between Hazel
Avenue and Folsom Boulevard (Freeway Segment 3). To
ensure that Eastbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS between Hazel Avenue and Folsom Boulevard, an auxiliary lane must be constructed. This improvement was recommended in the Traffic Operations Analysis Report for the U.S. 50 Auxiliary Lane Project. This improvement is included in the proposed 50 Corridor Mobility Fee Program.
3A.15-lq
(TPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.15-1r
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
7t-63
7t-64

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

Condition willbe
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit
Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit
Condition willbe
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Transportatio
n
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
and
Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
and
Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n
City of
Rancho
Cordova
Department
of Public
Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
The applicant shall pay its proportionate share offunding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to Eastbound U.S. 50 between Hazel Avenue and
Folsom Boulevard (Freeway Segment 3).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on Eastbound U.S. 50 between Folsom
Boulevard and Prairie City Road (Freeway Segment 4). To ensure that Eastbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS between Folsom Boulevard and Prairie City Road, an auxiliary lane must be constructed. This improvement was recommended in the Traffic Operations Analysis Report for the U.S. 50 Auxiliary Lane Project. This improvement is included in the proposed 50 Conidor Mobility Fee Program. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to Eastbound U.S. 50 between Folsom Boulevard and Prairie City Road (Freeway Segment 4).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on Westbound U.S. 50 between Prairie
City Road and Folsom Boulevard (Freeway Segment 16).

To ensure that Westbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS between Prairie City Road and Folsom Boulevard, an
auxiliary lane must be constructed. This improvement was recommended in the Traffic Operations Analysis Report for the U.S. 50 Auxiliary Lane Project. This improvement is included in the proposed 50 Conidor Mobility Fee Program. The
applicant shall pay its proportionate share offunding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to Westbound U.S. 50 between Prairie City Road and Folsom Boulevard (Freeway Segment 16).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on Westbound U.S. 50 between Hazel
Avenue and Sunrise Boulevard (Freeway Segment 18). To
ensure that Westbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS between HazelAvenue and Sunrise Boulevard, an auxiliary 3A.15-1s
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.15-1u
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.15-lv
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
7t-65
7t-66
7t-67

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit
Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

Works and
Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
and
Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
and
Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.
lane must be constructed. This improvement was recommended in the Traffic Operations Analysis Report for the U.S. 50 Auxiliary Lane Project, and included in the proposed Rancho Cordova Parkway interchange project.

Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for
improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to Westbound U.S. 50 between Hazel Avenue and Sunrise Boulevard (Freeway Segment 18).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Eastbound/Folsom Boulevard
Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 4). To ensure that Eastbound
U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS at the Folsom Boulevard merge, an auxiliary lane from the Folsom Boulevard merge to the Prairie City Road diverge must be constructed. This improvement was recommended in the Traffic Operations
Analysis Report for the U.S. 50 Auxiliary Lane Project. This improvement is included in the proposed 50 Conidor Mobility Fee Program. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for
improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Eastbound/Folsom
Boulevard Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 4).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Eastbound/Prairie City Road
Diverge (Freeway Diverge 5). To ensure that Eastbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS at the Prairie City Road off- ramp diverge, an auxiliary lane from the Folsom Boulevard merge must be constructed. This improvement was
recommended in the Trafflrc Operations Analysis Report for the U.S. 50 Auxiliary Lane Project. This auxiliary lane
improvement is included in the proposed 50 Conidor Mobility Fee Program. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by 3A.15-lw
(FPASP

EIR/I,IS)
3A.15-lx
GPASP
ErR/ErS)
71-68
7t-69

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit
Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit
Condition willbe
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit
This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50
Eastbound/Prairie City Road diverge (Freeway Diverge 5).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Eastbound/Prairie City Road
Direct Merge (Freeway Merge 6). To ensure that Eastbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS at the Prairie City Road onramp direct merge, an auxiliary lane to the East Bidwell Sheet - Scott Road diverge must be constructed. This auxiliary lane improvement is included in the proposed 50 Corridor Mobility Fee Program. The applicant shall pay iti proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50
Eastbound/Prairie City Road direct merge (Freeway Merge 6)' Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Eastbound/Prairie City Road
Flyover On-Ramp to Oak Avenue Parkway Off-Ramp
Weave (Freeway Weave 8). To ensure that Eastbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS at the Prairie City Road flyover on-ramp to Oak Avenue Parkway off-ramp weave, an
improvement acceptable to Caltrans should be implemented to eliminate the unacceptable weaving conditions. Such an
improvement may involve a "braided ramp".

The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Eastbound / Prairie City Road flyover on-ramp to Oak Avenue Parkway off-ramp weave
(Freeway Weave 8).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Eastbound/Oak Avenue
Parkway Loop Merge (Freeway Merge 9). To ensure that
Eastbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS at the Oak Avenue Parkway loop merge, an auxiliary lane to the East Bidwell Street - Scott Road diverge must be constructed. This auxiliary lane improvement is included in the oroposed 50 3A.15-ly
(FPASP
ErR/EIS)
3A.15-12
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.15-1aa
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
7l-70
7l-71
7t-72

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit
Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Conidor Mobility Fee Program. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Eastbound/ Oak Avenue Parkway loop merge (Freeway Merge 9).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50
Westbound/Empire Ranch Road Loop Ramp Merge
(Freeway Merge 23). To ensure that Westbound U.S. 50
operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound Empire Ranch Road loop on ramp should start the westbound auxiliary lane that ends at the East Bidwell Street - Scott Road offramp. The slip on ramp from southbound Empire Ranch Road would
merge into this extended auxiliary lane. Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. The
applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Westbound/Empire Ranch Road loop ramp merge (Freeway Merge 23).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Westbound/Oak Avenue
Parlcway Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 29).To ensure
that Westbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound Oak Avenue Parkway loop on ramp should start the westbound auxiliary lane that ends at the Prairie City Road off ramp. The slip on ramp from southbound Oak Avenue Parkway would merge into this extended auxiliary lane. Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share offunding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus sfudy or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Westbound/Oak Avenue
Parkway loop ramp merge (Freeway Merge 29).
3A.1s-ldd
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.15-1ee
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
7t-73
7t-74

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit
Condition willbe
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit
Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit
This subdivision will pay
its fair share ofthe
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrasfucture Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share ofthe
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
and
Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
and
Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
and
Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n
Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Westbound/Prairie City Road
Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 32). To ensure that
Westbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS at the Prairie City Road loop ramp merge, an auxiliary lane to the Folsom Boulevard off ramp diverge must be conshucted. This auxiliary lane improvement is included in the proposed 50 Corridor Mobility Fee Program. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50
Westbound/Prairie City Road Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway
Merge 32).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Westbound/Prairie City Road
Direct Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 33). To ensure that
Westbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS at the Prairie City Road direct ramp merge, an auxiliary lane to the Folsom Boulevard off ramp diverge must be constructed. This auxiliary lane improvement is included in the proposed 50 Corridor Mobility Fee Program. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50
Westbound/Prairie City Road direct ramp merge (Freeway
Merge 33).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Eastbound/Folsom Boulevard
Diverge (Freeway Diverge 34). To ensure that Westbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS at the Folsom Boulevard Diverge, an auxiliary lane from the Prairie City Road loop ramp merge must be constructed. Improvements to this freeway segnent must be implemented by Caltrans. This auxiliary lane improvement is included in the proposed 50 Conidor Mobility Fee Program. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by 3A.15-1ff
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.15-1gg
(FPASP
ErR/EIS)

34.15-rhh
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
7t-75
7t-76
7I-77

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

Condition willbe
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit.
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share ofthe
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n and City of
Rancho
Cordova
Department
of Public
Works
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Before approval of
improvement plans for
all project phases any
particular discretionary
development
application that
includes residential
and commercial or
mixed-use
development. As a
condition ofproject
approval and/or as a
condition of the
development
agreement for all
project phases.
applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Eastbound / Folsom Boulevard diverge (Freeway Diverge 34).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Westboundffiruel Avenue
Direct Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 38). To ensure that
Westbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS at the Hazel Avenue direct ramp merge, an auxiliary lane to the Sunrise Boulevard off ramp diverge must be constructed. This auxiliary lane improvement is included in the proposed 50 Conidor Mobility Fee Program. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 WestboundlHazel Avenue direct ramp merge (Freeway Merge 38).

Develop Commercial Support Services and Mixed-use
Development Concurrent with Housing Development, and
Develop and Provide Options for Alternative Transportation Modes. The project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application including commercial or mixed-use development along with residential uses shall develop
commercial and mixed-use development concurrent with
housing development, to the extent feasible in light of market realities and other considerations, to internalize vehicle hips.

Pedestrian and bicycle facilities shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Public Works Department. To further minimize impacts from the increased demand on area roadways and intersections, the project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application involving schools or commercial centers shall develop and implement safe and secure bicycle parking to promote alternative hansportation uses and reduce the volume ofsingle-occupancy vehicles using area roadways and intersections. The project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application shall participate in capital improvements and operating funds for transit service to increase the percent oftravel by transit. The project' S fair-share participation and the associated timing of the and servlce shall be identified n the
3A.15-lii
(TPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.15-2a
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
7l-78
7l-79

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
Concurrent with
construction for all
project phases.

Concunent with
construction for all
project phases.

As a condition of
project approval
and/or as a condition
of the development
agreement for all
project phases.
conditions ofapproval and/or the project's development
agreement. Improvements and service shall be coordinated, as necessary, with Folsom Stage Lines and Sacramento RT.

Participate in the City's Transportation System
Management Fee Program. The project applicant($ for any particular discretionary development application shall pay an appropriate amount into the City's existing Transportation System Management Fee Program to reduce the number of
single-occupant automobile travel on area roadways and
intersections.

Participate with the 50 Corridor Transpoftation
Management Association. The project applicant($ for any particular discretionary development application shall join and participate with the 50 Conidor Transportation Management Association to reduce the number of single-occupant
automobile travel on area roadways and intersections'
Pay Full Cost of Identified Improvements that Are Not
Funded by the City's Fee Program. In accordance with
Measure W, the project applicant(s) for any particular
discretionary development application shall provide fair-share contributions to the City's transportation impact fee program to fully fund improvements only required because of the Specific Plan.
3A.15-2b
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.15-2c
(FPASP
ErR/EIS)
3A.15-3
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
71-80
71-81
7t-82

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

Condition willbe
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit.

Condition willbe
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit.

Condition willbe
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit.

Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which proiect phase
The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the
Construction of Improvements to the Sibley Street/Blue
Ravine Road Intersection (Folsom Intersection 2). To ensure that the Sibley Street/Blue Ravine Road intersection operates at a LOS D with less than the Cumulative No Project delay, the northbound approach must be reconfigured to consist oftrvo left- turn lane, two through lanes, and one dedicated righrtum lane.

The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the Sibley Sfeet/Blue Ravine Road intersection (Folsom Intersection 2).

The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the
Construction of Improvements to the Oak Avenue
Parkway/East Bidwell Street Intersection (Folsom
Intersection 6). To ensure that the Oak Avenue Parkway/East Bidwell Street intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the eastbound (East Bidwell Street) approach must be reconfigured to consist of two left-turn lanes, four through lanes and a right- turn lane, and the westbound (East Bidwell Street) approach must be reconfigured to consist of trvo left turn lanes, four through lanes, and a right-turn lane. It is against the City of Folsom policy to have eight lane roads because of the impacts to non motorized traffrc and adjacent development; therefore, this improvement is infeasible.

The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the
Construction of Improvements to the East Bidwell
Street/College Street Intersection (Folsom Intersection 7).

To ensure that the East Bidwell Street/College Street
intersection operates at acceptable LOS C or better, the westbound approach must be reconfigured to consist ofone left-turn lane, one left-through lane, and two dedicated right- turn lanes. The shall its share of
3A.15-4a
(FPASP
ErR/EIS)
3A.15-4b
(FPASP
ErR/EIS)
3A.15-4c
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
71-83
7t-84
71-85

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit.

Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrashucture Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), Cify Traffic
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
the improvement
should be built.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the East Bidwell
Street/Nesmith Court intersection (Folsom Intersection 7).

The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the
Construction of Improvements to the East Bidwell
Street/Iron Point Road Intersection (Folsom Intersection 21). To ensure that the East Bidwell Street /Iron Point Road intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of trvo left-turn lanes, four through lanes and a right-turn lane, and the southbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of trvo left-turn lanes, four through lanes and a right-turn lane. It is against the City of Folsom policy to have eight lane roads because of the impacts to non motorized haffic and adjacent development; therefore, this improvement is infeasible.

The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the
Construction of Improvements to the Serpa Way/ Iron
Point Road Intersection (Folsom Intersection 23). To
improve LOS at the Serpa Way/ Iron Point Road intersection, the northbound approaches must be reshiped to consist ofone left-turn lane, one shared left+hrough lanes, and one right-turn lane. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the Serpa Way/Iron Point Road
Intersection (Folsom Intersection 23).

The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the
Construction of Improvements to the Empire Ranch
Road/Iron Point Road Intersection (Folsom Intersection
24).To ensure that the Empire Ranch Road / Iron Point Road intersection operates at a LOS D or better, all of the following improvements are required: The eastbound approach must be reconfigured to consist ofone left-turn lane, two through lanes, 3A.15-4d
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.15-4e
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.15-4f
(FPASP
ErR/EIS)
7l-86
7t-87
71-88

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit.

Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n.
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.
and a right-turn lane. The westbound approach must be
reconfigured to consist oftrvo left-turn lanes, one through lane, and a through-right lane. The northbound approach must be reconfigured to consist oftwo left-turn lanes, three through lanes, and a right-turn lane. The southbound approach must be reconfigured to consist oftrvo left-tum lanes, three through lanes, and a rightturn lane. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the Empire Ranch Road / Iron Point Road Intersection Before project build out. A phasing analysis should be performed prior to approval of the first subdivision map to determine during which project phase the improvement should be built. (Folsom Intersection 24).

The Applicant Shall Fund and Construct Improvements to
the Oak Avenue Parkway/Easton Valley Parkway
Intersection (Folsom Intersection 33). To ensure that the Oak Avenue Parkway/Easton Valley Parkway intersection operates at an acceptable LOS the southbound approach must be
reconfigured to consist of trvo left-turn lanes, two through lanes, and two right-turn lanes. The applicant shall fund and construct these improvements.

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on the Grant Line RoadMhite Rock Road
Intersection (Sacramento County Intersection 3). To ensure that the Grant Line RoadAilhite Rock Road intersection
operates at an acceptable LOS E or betterthis intersection should be replaced by some type of gade separated intersection or interchange. Improvements to this intersection are identified in the Sacramento County's Proposed General Plan.

Implementation of these improvements would assist in
reducing traffic impacts on this intersection by providing 3A.15-49
(TPASP

ETRTEIS)
3A.15-4i
(FPASP
ErRrErs)
71-89
7l-90

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit.

Condition willbe
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit.
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share ofthe
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrashucture Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n.

Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n
Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.
acceptable operation. Intersection improvements must be implemented by Sacramento County. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the Grant Line Road/White Rock Road Intersection (Sacramento County Intersection 3).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on Grant Line Road between White Rock
Road and Kiefer Boulevard (Sacramento County Roadway
Segments 5-7). To improve operation on Grant Line Road
between White Rock Road and Kiefer Boulevard, this roadway segment must be widened to six lanes. This improvement is proposed in the Sacramento County and the City of Rancho Cordova General Plans; however, it is not in the 2035 MTP.

Improvements to this roadway segment must be implemented by Sacramento County and the City of Rancho Cordova. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to Grant Line Road between White Rock Road and
Kiefer Boulevard (Sacramento County Roadway Segments 5- 7). The identified improvement would more than offset the impacts specifically related to the Folsom South of U.S. 50 project on this roadway segment.

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on Grant Line Road between Kiefer
Boulevard and Jackson Highway (Sacramento County
Roadway Segment 8). To improve operation on Grant Line
Road between Kiefer Boulevard Jackson Highway, this
roadway segment could be widened to six lanes. This
improvement is proposed in the Sacramento County and the City of Rancho Cordova General Plans; however, it is not in the 2035 MTP. Improvements to this roadway segment must be
implemented by Sacramento County and the City of Rancho Cordova. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for
improvements, based on a program established by that agency 3A.1s-4j
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.1s-4k
(FPASP
ErwErs)
7t-91
7t-92

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit.

Condition willbe
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share ofthe
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n.

Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.
to reduce the impacts to Grant Line Road between Kiefer Boulevard and Jackson Highway (Sacramento County
Roadway Segment 8). The identified improvement would more than offset the impacts specifically related to the Folsom South of U.S. 50 project on this roadway segment.

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on Hazel Avenue between Curragh Downs
Drive and U.S. 50 Westbound Ramps (Sacramento County
Roadway Segments 12-13). To improve operation on Hazel
Avenue between Curragh Downs Drive and the U.S. 50
westbound ramps? this roadway segment could be widened to eight lanes. This improvement is inconsistent with Sacramento County's general plan because the county's policy requires a maximum roadway cross section of six lanes. Analysis shown later indicates that improvements at the impacted intersection in this segment can be mitigated (see Mitigation Measure 3A.15- 4q). Improvements to impacted intersections on this segment will improve operations on this roadway segment and,
therefore; mitigate this segment impact. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts toHazel Avenue between Curragh Downs Drive and U.S. 50 Westbound Ramps (Sacramento County Roadway Segments 12-13).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacfs on White Rock Road between Grant Line
Road and Prairie City Road (Sacramento County Roadway
Segment 22).To improve operation on White Rock Road
between Grant Line Road and Prairie City Road, this roadway segment must be widened to six lanes. This improvement is included in the 2035 MTP but is not included in the
Sacramento County General Plan. Improvements to this
roadway segment must be implemented by Sacramento County.

The identified improvement would more than offset the impacts specifically related to the Folsom South of U.S. 50 project on this roadway segment. However, because of other development in the region that would substantially increase traffic levels, this roadwav seqment would continue to operate at an unacceptable 3A.15-41
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.15-4m
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
7t-93
7t-94

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit.

Condition willbe
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n.

Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n.

Sacramento
County
Department
of
Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
LOS F even with the capacity improvements identified to mitigate Folsom South of U.S. 50 impacts. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to White Rock Road between Grant Line Road and Prairie City Road
(Sacramento County Roadway Segment 22).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on White Rock Road between Empire
Ranch Road and Carson Crossing Road (Sacramento
County Roadway Segment 28). To improve operation on
White Rock Road between Empire Ranch Road and Carson
Crossing Road, this roadway segment must be widened to six lanes. Improvements to this roadway segment must be
implemented by Sacramento County. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to White Rock Road between Empire Ranch Road and Carson Crossing Road (Sacramento County Roadway Segment 28).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on the White Rock Road/Carson Crossing
Road Intersection (El Dorado County 1). To ensure that the White Rock Road/Carson Crossing Road intersection operates atanacceptable LOS, the eastbound right turn lane must be converted into a separate free right turn lane, or double right.

Improvements to this intersection must be implemented by El Dorado County. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the White Rock Road/Carson Crossing Road Intersection (El Dorado County l).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on the Hazel Avenue/U.S. 50 Westbound
Ramps Intersection (Caltrans Intersection 1). To ensure that the Hazel AvenueAJ.S. 50 westbound ramps intersection
operates at an acceptable LOS, the westbound aoproach must 3A.15-4n
(FPASP
ErR/EIS)
3A.15-4o
(FPASP
ErR/XIS)
3A.15-4p
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
7t-95
7t-96
7l-97

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit.

Condition willbe
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit.

Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share ofthe
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

Transportatio
n.

Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n.

Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n.
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.
be reconfigured to consist ofone dedicated leftturn lane, one shared left tlrough lane and three dedicated rightturn lanes.

Improvements to this intersection must be implemented by Caltrans and Sacramento County. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the Hazel AvenueAJ'S' 50 Westbound Ramps Intersection (Caltrans Intersection 1).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on Eastbound US 50 between Zinfandel
Drive and Sunrise Boulevard (Freeway Segment 1). To
ensure that Eastbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS between Zinfandel Drive and Sunrise Boulevard, an additional eastbound lane could be constructed. This improvement is not consistent with the Concept Facility in Caltrans State Route 50 Corridor System Management Plan; therefore, it is not likely to be implemented by Caltrans by 2030. Construction of the Capitol South East Connector, including widening White Rock Road and Grant Line Road to six lanes with limited access, could divert some haffic from U.S. 50 and partially mitigate the project's impact. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to Eastbound U.S. 50 between Zinfandel Drive and Sunrise Boulevard (Freeway Segment l).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on Eastbound US 50 between Rancho
Cordova Parkway and Hazel Avenue (Freeway Segment 3).

To ensure that Eastbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS between Rancho Cordova Parkway and Hazel Avenue, an
additional eastbound lane could be constructed. This
improvement is not consistent with the Concept Facility in Caltrans State Route 50 Corridor System Management Plan; therefore, it is not likely to be implemented by Caltrans by 2030. Construction of the Capitol South East Connector, including widening White Rock Road and Grant Line Road to six lanes with limited access, could divert some traffic offof U.S. 50 and partially mitigate the project's impact. The 3A.15-4q
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.15-4r
(TPASP
ErR/ErS)
71-98
7t-99

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

Condition willbe
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrashucture Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n.

Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.
applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to Eastbound U.S. 50 between Rancho Cordova
Parkway and Hazel Avenue (Freeway Segment 3).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on Eastbound US 50 between Folsom
Boulevard and Prairie City Road (Freeway Segment 5). To ensure that Eastbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS between Folsom Boulevard and Prairie City Road, the
eastbound auxiliary lane should be converted to a mixed flow lane that extends to and drops at the Oak Avenue Parkway off ramp (see mitigation measure 3A.15-40. Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. This
improvement is not consistent with the Concept Facility in Caltrans State Route 50 Corridor System Management Plan; therefore, it is not likely to be implemented by Caltrans by 2030. Construction of the Capitol South East Connector, including widening White Rock Road and Grant Line Road to six lanes with limited access, could divert some traffic off of U.S. 50 and partially mitigate the project's impact. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to Eastbound U.S. 50 between Folsom
Boulevard and Prairie City Road (Freeway Segment 5).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on Eastbound US 50 between Prairie City
Road and Oak Avenue Parlrway (Freeway Segment 6). To
ensure that Eastbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS between Prairie City Road and Oak Avenue Parkway, the
northbound Prairie City Road slip on ramp should merge with the eastbound auxiliary lane that extends to and drops at the Oak Avenue Parkway off ramp (see Mitigation Measures
3A. 15-4u, v and w), and the southbound Prairie City Road flyover on ramp should be braided over the Oak Avenue
Parkway off ramp and start an extended full auxiliary lane to the East Bidwell Street - Scott Road off ramp. Improvements 3A.15-4s
(FPASP
ErR/EIS)
3A.15-4t
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
7L-
100
7t-
101

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit.
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision.

Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n.

Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.
to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to Eastbound U.S. 50 between Prairie City Road and Oak Avenue Parkway (Freeway Segment 6).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on the U.S. 50 Eastbound / Prairie City
Road Slip Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 6). To ensure that
Eastbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS, the
northbound Prairie City Road slip on ramp should start the eastbound auxiliary lane that extends to and drops at the Oak Avenue Parkway off ramp (see mitigation measure 34.15-4u, w and x), and the southbound Prairie City Road flyover on ramp should be braided over the Oak Avenue Parkway off
ramp and start an extended full auxiliary lane to the East Bidwell Street - Scott Road offramp. Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Calhans. The
applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Eastbound lPrairie City Road slip ramp merge (Freeway Merge 6).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on the U.S. 50 Eastbound / Prairie City
Road Flyover On Ramp to Oak Avenue Parkway Off Ramp
Weave (Freeway Weave 7). To ensure that Eastbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound Prairie City Road slip on ramp should start the eastbound auxiliary lane that extends to and drops at the Oak Avenue Parkway off ramp (see mitigation measure 3A.15-4u, v and x), and the southbound Prairie City Road flyover on ramp should be braided over the Oak Avenue Parkway off ramp and start an extended full
auxiliary lane to the East Bidwell Street - Scott Road off ramp.

Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus studv or other apDrooriate and reliable mechanism paid for bv 3A.15-4u
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.15-4v
(TPASP
ErR/ErS)
7l-
102
7t-
103

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit.

This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision
This subdivision will pay
its fair share ofthe
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision
This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n.

Sacramento
County
Department
of
Transportatio
n.

Sacramento
County
Department
of
Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Before project build
out. A phasing
analysis should be
performed prior to
approval ofthe first
applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Eastbound / Prairie City Road Flyover On Ramp to Oak Avenue Parkway Off Ramp Weave (Freeway Weave 7).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Eastbound / Oak Avenue
Parkway Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 8). To ensure
that Eastbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS, the southbound Oak Avenue Parkway loop on ramp should merge with the eastbound auxiliary lane that starts at the southbound Prairie City Road braided flyover on ramp and ends at the East Bidwell Sheet - Scott Road offramp (see mitigation measure

34.15-4u, v and w). Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Cahrans. The applicant shallpay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to U.S. 50 Eastbound / Oak Avenue Parkway Loop Ramp Merge
(Freeway Merge 8).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Westbound / Empire Ranch
Road Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 27).To ensure
that Westbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound Empire Ranch Road loop on ramp should start the westbound auxiliary lane that ends at the East Bidwell Street - Scott Road off ramp. The slip on ramp from southbound
Empire Ranch Road slip ramp would merge into this extended auxiliary lane. Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. The applicant shall pay its
proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Westbound / Empire Ranch Road loop ramp merge
(Freeway Merge2T).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to
Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Westbound / Prairie City Road Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 35). To ensure that
Westbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS, the
northbound Prairie Citv Road loop on ramp should start the 3A.15-4w
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.15-4x
(TPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.15-4y
(FPASP
ErRrErs)
7l-
104
7l-
105
7l-
106

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit.

Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision
This subdivision will pay
its fair share of the
following improvements
with the payment of
Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fees
(SPIF), City Traffic
Impact Fees and
Sacramento County
Wide Transportation fees
collected prior to
building permit issuance
in this subdivision
The Capital Southeast
Connector -JPA has
executed a construction
contract with
Transportatio
n.

City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
subdivision map to
determine during
which project phase
the improvement
should be built.

Prior to issuance of
phase 3 building
permits.

Prior to issuance of
phase I building
permits.
westbound auxiliary lane that continues beyond the Folsom Boulevard off ramp. The slip on ramp from southbound Prairie City Road slip ramp would merge into this extended auxiliary lane. Improvements to this freeway segment must be
implemented by Caltrans. The applicant shallpay its
proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Westbound / Prairie City Road Loop Ramp Merge
(Freeway Merge 35).

East Bidwell Street/Regency Parkway (Driveway #6). Prior to buildout ofthe Toll Brothers Site, the project applicant shall construct the intersection as shown in Figure 4-2 of the Addendum:
> Northbound: one thru lane and one left turn lane in a 150- foot pocket with 60-foot taper;
> Southbound: one thru lane and one right turn lane in a 150- foot pocket with 60-foot taper;
> Westbound: one shared lane, plus a 300-foot northbound acceleration lane on East Bidwell Street to receive left- turns from Regency Parkway (a second northbound lane on East Bidwell Street starting from Regency Parkway is
equivalent to the 300-foot acceleration lane); and
> Control: side-street-stop-control;
Note that unsignalized left tums to East Bidwell Street are against City policy. The northbound acceleration lane on East Bidwell Street is an interim configuration until the intersection warrants signalization. Signalization will be triggered as part of the entitlement process on neighboring parcels. A future signal at this location is included in Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan, and plan area fees paid by the Project contribute towards its construction in the future.

East Bidwell Street/White Rock Road. Prior to buildout of the Toll Brothers Site, the project applicant shall implement either (A) or (B) below:

4.17-l
(Addendum
)

4.17-2
(Addendum
)
7t-
t07
7t-
108

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

Yes
Goodfellow Brothers,
Inc. to construct the
Capital Southeast
Connector from Prairie
City Road to East
Bidwell Street. The
construction contract
was executed in
December of 2020.

Grading and construction
commenced in April
2021andwas completed
in April of 2023.The
project included the
relocation and
signalization of the
existing White Rock
Road/East Bidwell Street
intersection. The
owner/applicant will pay
the Sacramento County
Transportation
Development Fee prior
to issuance of all
building permits in the
subdivision.

The Community
Development
Department has
reviewed and approved
the improvement plans
for the construction of
these required
improvements including
the plans for the
modification to the
existing traffrc signal at
the intersection of East
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
Signalize the
intersection and
conduct all geometric
improvements, with
the exception ofthe
second northbound
thru lane prior to
issuance ofphase I
building permits.

Construct the second
northbound thru lane
prior to issuance of
(A) The Capital Southeast Connector Joint Powers
Authority project has programmed to relocate and signalize the East Bidwell Street/White Rock Road intersection as shown in the October 2017 geometric conceptual drawing, or equivalent improvements (i.e., three southbound approach lanes, four eastbound approach lanes, and tlree westbound approach lanes). Figure 4-3 ofthe Addendum provides a
conceptual intersection layout for this mitigation. Under this scenario, fair share is defined as the project's responsibility to the Sacramento County Transportation Development Fee.

The project applicant is required to pay the Sacramento County Transportation Development Fee. Option A can be
considered to be irnplemented once the JPA has let contracts for construction of the new intersection. This will insure that the mitigation is constructed before project traffic adds five or more seconds of delay to the intersection.
(B) Signalize the existing East Bidwell Street/White Rock Road intersection with the existing geometry. Figure 4-4 of the Addendum provides a conceptual intersection layout for this mitigation.

East Bidwell Street/IVlangini Parkway. Prior to buildout of the Toll Brothers Site, the project applicant shall signalize the intersection with the following geometry @igure 4-5 of the Addendum):
> Northbound: One left-turn lane in a 200-foot pocket with a 60-foot taper, two thru lanes, and one righlturn lane in a 150-foot pocket with a 60-foot taper (the second tlnu lane shall be developed 300 feet south ofthe intersection);
> Southbound: One left-turn lane in a 200-foot pocket with a 60-foot taper, one thru lane, and one rightturn lane in a 1 50-foot pocket with a 60-foot taper;

4.17-3
(Addendum
)
7t-
109

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

Yes
Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit.

Bidwell Street and
Mangini Parkway. These
improvements have been
completed and accepted
by the City.

The required
improvements in this
condition have been
completed and accepted
by the City. These
improvements were
constructed as part of the
off-site improvements
for the Mangini Ranch
Phase 2, Village No. 7
subdivision.

The Community
Development
Department has
approved the plans for
the reconstruction and
signalization of the East
Bidwell Street/Alder
Creek Parkway
intersection in
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
phase 2 building
permits.

Construct all
geometric
improvements with the
exception of one thru
northbound lane prior
to issuance ofphase I
building permits.

Construct the second
thru northbound lane
prior to issuance of
phase 3 building
permits.

Construct all
geometric
improvements with the
exception ofone thru
northbound lane and
one thru southbound
lane prior to issuance
of phase I building
permits. Construct the
> Eastbound and westbound: One left-turn lane in a 200-foot pocket with a 60-foot taper, one thru lane, and one right- turn lane in a 200-foot pocket with a 60-foot taper.

Note that northbound East Bidwell street will remain at two lanes from Mangini Parkway to US 50.

East Bidwell Street/Savannah Parkway. Prior to buildout of the Toll Brothers site, the project applicant shall reconstruct the intersection with the following geometry figure 4-6 of the Addendum):
> Northbound approach: One thru lane and one shared
through-right lane with a 15O-foot taper;
> Southbound approach: One leftturn lane in a 150-foot
pocket plus 60-foot taper, and one through lane;
> Westbound approach: One left turn lane in a 60-foot
pocket plus 60-foot taper, and one through lane;
> Southbound departure: Conshuct a southbound receiving and acceleration lane for westbound left turn traffic. The acceleration lane should be in a 300-foot pocket plus an appropriate taper.

Note that unsignalized left turns to East Bidwell Street are against City policy. The southbound acceleration lane on East Bidwell Street is an interim configuration until the intersection wanants signalization. Signalization will be triggered as part of the entitlement process on neighboring parcels. A future signal at this location is included in FPASP, and plan area fees paid by the project applicant conhibute towards its construction in the future.

East Bidwell Street/Alder Creek Parkway. Prior to buildout ofthe Toll Brothers Site, the project applicant shall reconstruct and signalize the intersection as shown in Figure 4-7 of the Addendum:
> Northbound approach: One U-turn lane in a 150-foot
pocket with a 60-foot taper, two through lanes, and one right turn lane in a 150-foot pocket plus 60-foot taper.

4.17-4
(Addendum
)

4.17-5
(Addendum
)
7l-
110
7l-
111

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
issuance ofa
building permit in
Phase 3
accordance with this
condition.

The Capital Southeast
Connector-JPA project
has been completed. The
Connector project will
implement and complete
Option A in this
condition. The
owner/applicant shall
implement the required
improvements to the
intersection in
compliance with this
condition prior to
issuance ofthe first
Certifi cate of Occupancy
in the Phase 3 portion of
the project.

City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
second thru
northbound lane and
the second thru
southbound lane prior
to issuance ofphase 3
building permits.

Prior to issuance of
phase 3 building
permits
> Southbound approach: One leftturn lane in a240-foot
pocket plus 60-foot taper, and two through lanes. The
second southbound through lane can be dropped south of
Old Ranch Way.
> Westbound approach: One right turn lane, plus one left- turn lane in a 200-foot pocket plus 60-foot taper'
The above mitigations are consistent with the ultimate
geometry for East Bidwell near Alder Creek Pkwy and builds on conditions ofapproval from neighboring projects.

White Rock Road/Oak Avenue Parkway. Prior to project
buildout, the project applicant shall implement either (A) or (B) below:
(A) The Capital Southeast Connector Joint Powers Authority (JPA) project has programmed to realign this portion of White Rock Road and build a partial signal to accommodate
anticipated U-Turns. Expand or construct a signalized
intersection as follows:
> Southbound: A single shared lane for left and right turns' > Eastbound: A thru lane and a leftAJ-turn in 300-foot
pocket plus taper.
> Westbound: A thru lane and a right-turn in 300-foot
pocket plus taper.
> Signalize with protected phasing for left-turns and U- furns.
> Geometric design shall be consistent with Capital
Southeast Connector Joint Powers Authority adopted
standards.
(B) Channelize the White Rock Road/Oak Avenue Pkwy
intersection on the existing White Rock Road alignment to restrict turning movements to westbound right turns and southbound right turns. The westbound right turn requires a 365-foot deceleration lane, and the southbound right turn requires a 960-foot acceleration lane. Figure 4-8 ofthe Addendum provides a conceptual layout for the mitigated intersection.

4.17-6
(Addendum
)
7l-
tl2

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

Yes
Yes
The City obtained a
letter from Regional San
which provides
verification that there is
adequate capacity in the
existing Regional San
conveyance and
treatment system to
accommodate the entire
Folsom Plan Area at
buildout. Confirmation
from Regional San was
required because the
Folsom Plan Area is
served by the existing
Regional San Lift
Station on Iron Point
Road. The City Sewer
Lift Station and Forced
The Phase 1 Sanitary
Sewer infrastructure
including the off-site
sewer trunk main, the
Alder Creek Parkway
sewer lift station and
forced main to serve this
subdivision have been
constructed by the FPA
landowners and have
been completed and
accepted by the City and
are cunently in
operation.

City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
and City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
and City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
Before approval of
final maps and
issuance of building
permits for any project
phases.

Before approval of
final maps and
issuance of building
permits for any project
phases.

Demonstrate Adequate SRWTP Wastewater Treatment
Capacity. The project applicant(s) ofall project phases shall demonstrate adequate capacity at the SRWTP for new
wastewater flows generated by the project. This shall involve preparing a tentative map-level study and paying connection and capacity fees as identified by SRCSD. Approval of the final map and issuance of building permits for all project phases shall not be granted until the City verifies adequate SRWTP capacity is available for the amount of development identified in the tentative map.

Submit Proof of Adequate On- and Off-Site Wastewater
Conveyance Facilities and Implement On- and Off-Site
Infrastructure Service Systems or Ensure That Adequate
Financing Is Secured. Before the approval ofthe final map and issuance of building permits for all project phases, the project applicant(s) ofall project phases shall submit proofto the City of Folsom that an adequate wastewater conveyance system either has been constructed or is ensured through payment of the City's facilities augmentation fee as described under the Folsom Municipal Code Title 3, Chapter 3.40,
"Facilities Augmentation Fee - Folsom South Area Facilities Plan," or other sureties to the City's satisfaction. Both on-site wastewater conveyance infrashucture and off-site force main sufficient to provide adequate service to the project shall be in place for the amount of development identified in the tentative map before approval of the final map and issuance of building permits for all project phases, or their financing shall be ensured to the satisfaction of the City.
3A.16-3
(FPASP
ErR/EIS)
3A.16-1
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
7l-
tt4
Utilities and Service Systems
7t-
113

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

Yes
Yes
Main which connects to
the Regional San Lift
Station has been
accepted by the City and
is cunently in operation.

The owner/applicant has
constructed the
necessary infrastructure
to provide potable water
to the subdivision. The
potable Phase I water
infrastructure for the
Folsom Plan Area has
been reviewed, approved
and accepted by the City
and is currently in
operation.

The off-site potable
water infrashucture to
serve the subdivision has
been reviewed, approved
and accepted by the City
and is cunently in
operation. In addition,
the City has verified that
the off-site potable water
infrashucture is adequate
to serve the subdivision.

City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
and City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Departrnent
and City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
Before approval of
final maps and
issuance of building
permits for any project
phases.

Before approval of
finalmaps and
issuance of building
permits for any project
phases.

Submit Proof of Surface Water Supply Availability. a. Prior to approval of any small-lot tentative subdivision map subject to Government Code Section 66473.7 (SB 221), the City shall comply with that statute. Prior to approval of any small-lot tentative subdivision map for a proposed residential project not subject to that statute, the City need not comply with Section 66473.7, or formally consult with any public water system that would provide water to the affected area; nevertheless, the City shall make a factual showing or impose conditions similar to those required by Section 66473.7 to ensure an adequate water supply for development authorized by the map. b. Prior to recordation of each final subdivision map, or prior to City approval of any similar project-specific discretionary approval or entitlement required for nonresidential uses, the project applicant($ ofthat project phase or activity shall demonstrate the availability of a reliable and sufficient water supply from a public water system for the amount of development that would be authorized by the final subdivision map or project-specific discretionary nonresidential approval or entitlement. Such a demonshation shall consist of information showing that both existing sources are available or needed supplies and
improvements will be in place prior to occupancy.

Submit Proof of Adequate Off-Site Water Conveyance
Facilities and Implement Off-Site Infrastructure Service System or Ensure That Adequate Financing Is Secured.

Before the approval of the final subdivision map and issuance of building permits for all project phases, the project applicant(s) of any particular discretionary development application shall submit proof to the City of Folsom that an adequate off-site water conveyance system either has been constructed or is ensured or other sureties to the City's satisfaction. The off-site water conveyance infrastructure sufficient to provide adequate service to the project shall be in 3A.18-1
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.18-2a
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
7l-
115
7t-
116

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
approval of a future
TMP
Yes
The Community
Development
Department and the
Public Works
Department willwork
closely to implement the
future Truck
Management Plan
(TMP) and coordinate
responses to any future
entitlement and CEQA
compliance need for the
TMP and make sure the
This condition is not
applicable to this
subdivision. The water
supply for this
subdivision is provided
by the City of Folsom
Water Treatment Plant
rather than an Off-Site
Water Treatment Plant
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
and City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
Prior to approval of
first tentative map or
discretionary approval
within SPA that would
place sensitive
receptors along
roadways that quarry
trucks would
reasonably use to
access U.S. Highway

50. Before approval of
finalmaps and
issuance of building
permits for any project
phases.

Implement East Sacramento Regional Aggregate Mining
Truck Management Plan or Other Measures to Reduce
Exposure of Sensitive Receptors to Operational Emissions of Toxic Air Contaminants from Quarry Truck Traffic. The City of Folsom is a participant in the development of an East Sacramento Regional Aggregate Mining Truck Management
Plan (TMP), a cooperative eflort led by the County of
Sacramento, with the input of the City of Folsom, the City of Rancho Cordova and other interested parties, including
representatives of quarry project applicants. When the County Board of Supervisors approved entitlements for the Teichert S
of
eichert'T
conditionsadopted
that
alsorl0,20ovemberNln
aand
projectquarry
Demonstrate Adequate Off-Site Water Treatment Capacity
(if the Off-Site Water Treatment Plant Option is Selected).

If an off-site water heatment plant (WTP) alternative is selected (as opposed to the on-site WTP alternative), the project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application shall demonstrate adequate capacity at the off-site WTP. This shall involve preparing a tentative map-level study and paying connection and capacity fees as determined by the City. Approval of the final project map shall not be granted until the City verifies adequate water treatment capacity either is available or is certain to be available when needed for the amount of development identified in the tentative map before approval of the final map and issuance of building permits for all project phases. A certificate ofoccupancy shall not be issued for any building within the SPA until the water treatment capacity sufficient to serve such building has been conshucted and is in place.
place for the amount of development identified in the tentative map before approvalof the final subdivision map and issuance of building permits for all project phases, or their financing shall be ensured to the satisfaction of the City. A certificate of occupancy shall not be issued for any building within the SPA until the water conveyance infrastructure sufficient to serve such building has been conshucted and is in place.

Cumulative
Mitigation
Measure
AIR-I-
Land
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.18-2b
(TPASP
ErR/ErS)
7t-
118
Additional Measures
7l-
tl7

03/25/2025 Item No.13.
requirements in this
condition of approval are
met to the satisfaction of
the City.
participation in, and fair share funding of, a TMP to implement roadway capacity and safety improvements required to improve the compatibility of truck traffic from the quarries with the future urban development in the Folsom Specific Plan area and other jurisdictions that will be affected by quarry truck traffic.

The development agreement adopted by the County for the Teichert project imposes limits on the amounts of annual aggregate sales from Teichert's facility until a TMP is adopted.

The City of Folsom does not have direct jurisdiction over the Teichert, DeSilva Gates, or Walltown quarry project applicants as these projects are located within the unincorporated portion of the County. The County, as the agency with the primary authority over the quanies, has indicated that it intends to prepare an environmental analysis in accordance with CEQA prior to adoption of a TMP. The City's authority to control the activities ofthe quarry fucks includes restrictions or other actions, such as the approval and implementation of specialized road improvements to accommodate quarry truck traffic, that would be applicable within the City's jurisdictional boundaries.

For the foregoing reasons, the City of Folsom considers itself a "responsible agency" (as that term is defined at State CEQA Guidelines, CCR Section 15381), in that it has some
discretionary power over some elements of a future TMP, if such TMP calls for improvements or other activities on
roadways within the jurisdiction of the City. In a responsible agency role, the City would follow the process specified in the CEQA Guidelines for consideration and approval of the
environmental analysis prepared by the County for a TMP after such documentation is prepared and adopted by the County. (State CEQA Guidelines, CCR Section 15096.)
Because no final project description for a TMP has been developed as of the completion of this FEIR/FEIS, the City would have to speculate as to those portions of a TMP that might be proposed for implementation within its jurisdiction, or the impacts that could arise from the implementation of as-yet uncertain components. Accordingly, formulation of the precise means of mitigating the potential cumulative air quality impacts to the TMP is not feasible or

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

However, as the preferred, feasible, and intended mitigation strategy to address the cumulative impacts of quarry truck traffic tlrough the SPA, the City shall implement, or cause to be implemented those portions of the TMP (as described
above) that are within its authority to control. In implementing the TMP, the City shall ensure that the TMP or traffic measures imposed by the City within the SPA reduce the risk of cancer to sensitive receptors along routes within the SPA from toxic air contaminant emissions to no more than296 in one million (SMAQMD 2009. March. Recommended Protocol for
Evaluating the Location of Sensitive Land Uses Adjacent to Major Roadways, Version 2.2:7), or such different threshold of significance mandated by SMAQMD or ARB at the time, if
any. With this mitigation, the cumulative air quality impacts from truck toxic air contaminants would be less than
significant.

As an alternative (or in addition) to implementing the TMP within the SPA, the following measures could (and should) be voluntarily implemented by the quarry project applicant(s) (Teichert, DeSilva Gates, and Granite [Walltown]) to help ensure exposure ofsensitive receptors to TACs generated by quarry truck traffic to the 296-in-one-million threshold of significance identified above. The City encourages
implementation of the following measures:
> The quarry project applicant(s) should meet with the City of Folsom to discuss mitigation strategies, implementation,.and cost.
> A site-specific, projectJevel screening analysis and/or Health Risk Assessment (HRA) should be conducted by the City of Folsom and funded by the truck applicant(s) for all proposed sensitive receptors (e.g., residences, schools) in the SPA that would be located along the sides of roadway
segments that are identified in Table 4-4 as being potentially significant under any ofthe analyzed scenarios. Each
project-level analysis shall be performed according to the standards set forth by SMAQMD for the purpose of
disclosure to the and decision makers. The

03/25/2025 Item No.13.
level analysis shall account for the location ofthe receptors relative to the roadway, their distance from the roadway, the projected future haffic volume for the year 2030 (including the proportion of diesel hucks), and emission rates
representative of the vehicle fleet for the year when the sensitive land uses would first become operational and/or occupied. If the incremental increase in cancer risk
determined by in the HRA exceeds296 in one million (or a different threshold of significance recommended by
SMAQMD or ARB at the time, if any), then project design mitigation should be employed, which may include the
following:
. Increase the setback distance between the roadway and affected receptor. If this mitigation measure is determined by the City of Folsom to be necessary, based on the
results of the HRA, the quarry truck applicant(s) should pay the Folsom South of U.S. 50 Specific Plan project
applicant($ and the City of Folsom a fee that shall serve as compensation for lost development profit and lost City tax revenues, all as determined by the parties. Said
mitigation fee shall be determined in consultation with the quarry project applicant(s), the Folsom South of U.S. 50 Specific Plan project applicant(s), and the City of Folsom.

No quarry trucks shall be allowed to pass on any roadway segment immediately adjacent to or within the SPA until said mitigation fees are paid.
. Implement tiered tree planting of fine-needle species, such as redwood, along the near side of the roadway segments and, if feasible, along the roadway 500 feet in both
directions of the initial planting (e.g., 500 feet north and south of a roadway that runs east-west) to enhance the
dispersion and filtation of mobile-source TACs
associated with the adjacent roadway. These trees should be planted at a density such that a solid visual buffer is achieved after the trees reach maturity, which breaks the line of sight between U.S. 50 and the proposed homes.

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

Condition will be
satisfied prior to
approval ofa future
TMP.

The Community
Development
Department and the
Public Works
Department will work
City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Prior to approval of
first tentative map or
discretionary approval
within SPA that would
place sensitive
These trees should be planted before occupation ofany
affected sensitive land uses. This measure encourages the planting ofthese trees in advance ofthe conshuction of
potentially affected receptors to allow the trees to become established and progress toward maturity. The life of
these trees should be maintained through the duration of the quarry projects. The planting, cost, and ongoing
maintenance ofthese trees should be funded by the quarry project applicant(s).
. To improve the indoor air quality at affected receptors, implement the following measures before the occupancy
ofthe affected residences and schools:
. equip all affected residences and school buildings
developed in the SPA with High Efficiency Particle
Arresting (mPA) filter systems at all mechanicalair
intake points to the interior rooms;
. use the heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems to maintain all residential units under positive pressure at all times;
. locate air intake systems for IIVAC as far away from
roadway air pollution sources as possible; and
. develop and implement an ongoing education and
maintenance plan about the filtration systems associated with HVAC for residences and schools.

To the extent this indoor air quality mitigation would not already be implemented as part of the Folsom South of U.S. 50 Specific Plan project development, this mitigation should be paid for by the quarry project applicant(s) before any quarry trucks are allowed to pass on any roadway that is within 400 feet of any residence or school within the SPA.

Implement East Sacramento Regional Aggregate Mining
Truck Management Plan or Other Measures to Reduce
Exposure of Sensitive Receptors to Operational Noise from Quarry Truck Traflic. The City of Folsom is a participant in the development of an East Sacramento Regional Aggregate Cumulative
Mitigation
Measure
NOrSE-1-
Land
7l-
tt9

03/25/2025 Item No.13.
closely to implement the
future Truck
Management Plan
(TMP) and coordinate
responses to any future
entitlement and CEQA
compliance need for the
TMP and make sure the
requirements in this
condition of approval are
met to the satisfaction of
the City.
receptors along
roadways that quarry
trucks would
reasonably use to
access U.S. 50.

Mining Truck Management Plan (TMP), a cooperative effort led by the County of Sacramento, with the input of the City of Folsom, the City of Rancho Cordova and other interested parties, including representatives of quarry proj ect applicants.

When the County Board of Supervisors approved entitlements for the Teichert quarry project in November 2010, it also adopted conditions of approval and a development agreement that requires Teichert's participation in, and fair share funding ol a TMP to implement roadway capacity and safety
improvements required to improve the compatibility of truck traffic from the quanies with the future urban development in the SPA and otherjurisdictions that will be affected by quarry truck traffic. The development agreement adopted by the County for the Teichert project imposes limits on the amounts of annual aggregate sales from Teichert's facility until a TMP is adopted. The City of Folsom does not have direct jurisdiction over the Teichert, Desilva Gates, or Walltown quarry project applicants as these projects are located within the
unincorporated portion ofthe County. The Counfy, as the agency with the primary authority over the quanies, has indicated that it intends to prepare an environmental analysis in accordance with CEQA prior to adoption of a TMP. The City's authority to control the activities ofthe quarry trucks includes restrictions or other actions, such as the approval and implementation of speciali zed road improvements to
accommodate quarry truck trafftc, that would be applicable within the City's jurisdictionalboundaries. For the foregoing reasons, the City of Folsom considers itself a "responsible agency" (as that term is defined at State CEQA Guidelines, CCR Section 15381), in that it has some discretionary power over some elements of a future TMP, if such TMP calls for improvements or other activities on roadways within the jurisdiction of the City. In a responsible agency role, the City would follow the process specified in the CEQA Guidelines for consideration and approval ofthe environmental analysis prepared by the County for a TMP after such documentation is prepared and adopted by the County. (State CEQA Guidelines, CCR Section 15096.)
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

Because no final project descriptior for a TMP has been developed as of the completion of this FEIR/FEIS, the City would have to speculate as to those portions of a TMP that might be proposed for implementation within its jurisdiction, or the impacts that could arise from the of as yet uncertain components. Accordingly, formulation of the precise means of mitigating the potential cumulative noise impacts pursuant to the TMP is not currently feasible cr practical. However, as the prefened, feasible, and intended mitigation sffategy to address the cumulative impacts of quarry truck haffic through the SPA, the City shall implement, or cause to be implemented those portions of the TMP (as described above) that are within its authority to control. In implementing the TMP, the City shall ensure that the TMP or traffic measures imposed by the City within the SPA reduce the traffic noise exposure to sensitive receptors along routes within the SPA so as to ensure that sensitive receptors are not exposed to interior noise levels in excess of 45 dBA, or increases in:nterior noise levels of 3 dBA or more, whichever is more restrictive. With this mitigation, the cumulative noise impacts from truck traffic would be less than significant.

As an alternative (or in addition) to implementing the TMP within the SPA, the following measures could (and should) be voluntarily implemented by the quarry project applicant(s) (Teichert, Desilva Gates, and Grarite [Walltown]) to help ensure interior noise levels for semitive receptors to noise generated by quarry truck traffic would not exceed 45 dBA or increase of3 dBA over existing conditions, as identified above.

The City encourages implementation of the following
measures:
> The quarry project applicant($ should meet with the City of Folsom to discuss mitigation strategies, implementation, and cost.
> A site-specific, project-level screening analysis should be conducted by the City of Folmm and funded by the quarry truck applicant($ for all propcsed sensitive receptors (e.g., residences, schools) in the SPA that would be located

03/25/2025 Item No.13.
along the sides of roadway segments thatne identified in Table 4-8 as being potentially significant under any of the analyzed scenarios. The analysis should be conducted
using an approved three dimersional traffic noise modeling program (i.e., TNM or SoundPlan). Each project-level
analysis should be performed according to the standards set forth by the City of Folson for the purpose of
disclosure to the public and decision makers. The project- level analysis should account for the location ofthe
receptors relative to the roadway, their distance from the roadway, and the projected friture traffic volume for the year 2030 (including the percentage ofheavy trucks). Ifthe incremental increase in traffic noise levels are determined to exceed the threshold of significance recommended by
the City of Folsom, then design mitigation should be
employed, which may include the following:

Modelthe benefits of soundwalls (berm/wall combination) along the quarry truck hauling roadways and affected
receptors not to exceed a total height ofeight feet (two- foot berm and six-foot concrete mason wall). If this
mitigation measure is determined by the City of Folsom to be inadequate, additional three dimensional traffic noise modeling should be conducted with the inclusion of
rubberized asphalt at the experse ofthe quarry truck
applicant(s). No quarry trucks should be allowed to pass on any roadway segment immed-ately adjacent to or within
the SPA until said mitigation has been agreed upon by the City of Folsom and fees for conshuction of said mitigation are paid by the quarry truck a:plicant(s).

Implement the installation of rubberized asphalt (quiet pavement) on roadway segments adjacent to sensitive
receptors that carry quarry tnrcks if soundwalls do not provide adequate reduction oftraffic noise levels. The
inclusion of rubberized asphalt would provide an
additional 3 to 5 dB oftraffic noise reduction. The cost of construction using rubberized asphalt should be borne by

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

YesThe FPA landowners
have satisfied all ofthe
City of
Folsom
Before approval of
finalmaps and
the quarry truck applicant(9. Said mitigation fee should be determined in consultation with the quarry project
applican(s), the Folsom South of U.W. 50 Specific Plan
project applicant(s), and the City of Folsom. No quarry trucks should be allowed to pass on any roadway segment immediately adjacent to or within the SPA until said
mitigation fees are paid.
> To improve the indoor noise levels at affected receptors, implement the following measures before the occupancy of the affected residences and schools:
. Conduct an interior noise analysis once detailed
construction plans ofresidences adjacent to affected
roadways are available to determine the required window package at second and third Joor receptors to achieve the interior noise level standard of 45 dB Ldn without quarry trucks.
. Determine the interior quan!'truck traffic noise level increases at second and third floor receptors adjacent to affected roadways compared to no quarry truck
conditions. Window package upgrades are expected to be
necessary due to the trafftc noise level increases caused by quarry trucks along affected roadways. Quarry truck
applicant(s) should pay for the cost ofwindow package
upgrades (increased sound transmission class rated
windows) required to achieve the interior noise level
standard of 45 dB Ldn with the inclusion of quarry truck traffic.

To the extent this noise mitigation would not already be implemented as part of the Folsom South of U.W. 50
Specific Plan project development, this mitigation should be paid for by the quarry prcject applicant($ before any quarry trucks are allowed to pass on any roadway that is within 400 feet of anv residence or school within the SPA.

Coordinate and Fund the Backbone Infrastructure and Off- Site Water Facility Alternative. The project applicant shall N/A7l-
120

03/25/2025 Item No.13.
mitigation measures for
the design and
construction of the Phase
I Water and Sewer
Backbone Infrastructure
to serve the first of
development in the FPA.

The Phase I backbone
Infrastructure was
completed and accepted
by the City in 2018 and
is cunently in use in the
FPA and being owned
and operated by the City.

The off-site water
facility alternative
improvements were not
implemented. The water
for the FPA was
provided through the
conservation of existing
water in the City. The
new water supply
alternative was validated
in2014.

Community
Development
Department
and City of
Folsom
Public Works
Department
issuance of building
permits for any project
phase, the project
applicant shall
demonstrate to the
City's satisfaction the
fair share contribution
towards
implementation of
Backbone
Infrastructure and Off-
Site Water Facility
improvements and
associated required
mitigation as identified
inthe Folsom South of
U.S. Highway 50
Backbone
Infrastructure
Mitigated Negative
Declaration
(December 2014) or
the Revised Proposed
Off- Sit e W ater F ac il ity
Alternative Addendum
to the FPASP EINEIS
(approved December
2012); as applicable.
participate in the FPASP owners' group and shall fund and contribute their fair share to the backbone infrastructure and off-site water facility alternative improvements. The project applicant shall coordinate with owlers' gtoup to implement the following measures detailed inthe Folsom South of U.S.

Highw ay 5 0 B ackb one h frastructure Mitigate d Ne gative Declaration (December 20 I 4) :
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure I-1: Design above
ground pump station and storage tank facilities to reduce visualimpacts.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure I-2: Develop and
implement a landscaping plan for pump station and storage tank facilities to reduce visual impacts.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure III-I: Prepare and
Implement NOX Reduction Plan
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure lll-2:Pay Off-site
Mitigation Fee to SMAQMD to off-setNOX Emissions
Generated by Construction.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure III-4: Implement A
Site Investigation to Determine the Presence of NOA and, if necessary, Prepare and Implement an Asbestos Dust
Control Plan.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Nleasure IV-l: Conduct
Special-Status Plant Surveys; Implement Avoidance and
Mitigation Measures or Compensatory Mitigation
> Backbone MND Mitigation Nleasure IV-2: Implement
Conditions of the Biological Opinion (BO) for Federally Listed Vernal Pool Invertebrates.
> Backbone MND Mitigation IUeasure IV-3: Implement
Conditions of the BiologicalOpinion for Impacts on
Valley Elderberry Longhorn Beetle.
> Backbone MND Mitigation lVeasure IV-4: Western
Spadefoot Toad

03/25/2025 Item No.13.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-5: Westem Pond
Turtle
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-6(a): Swainson's
Hawk Nesting Habitat
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-6(b): Swainson's
Hawk Foraging Habitat
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-7: Tricolored
Blackbird
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-8:Nesting
Raptors
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-9: Nesting Special Status Birds and Migratory Birds
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-10: Special-Status Bats
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-12: Implement
Section 1602 Master Streambed Alteration Agreement
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-13: Conduct
Surveys to Identifu and Map Valley Needlegrass
Grassland; Implement Avoidance and Minimization
Measures or Compensatory Mitigation, if necessary
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-14: Secure
Amended Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit and Section
401 Permit and Implement All Permit Conditions; Ensure
No Net Loss of Functions of Wetlands, Other Waters of
the U.S., and Waters of the State
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-15: Conduct Tree
Survey, Prepare and Implement an Oak Woodland
Mitigation Plan, Replace Native Oak Trees Removed, and
Implement Measures to Avoid and Minimize Indirect
Impacts on Oak Trees and Oak Woodland Habitat
Retained On-Site.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-l1: American
Badger

03/25/2025 Item No.13.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure V-l: Comply with
the applicable procedures in the FAPA and implementation of applicable historic property treatment plans
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure V-2: Conduct
Conshuction Personnel Education, Conduct On-Site
Monitoring if Required, Stop Work if CulturalResources
are Discovered, Assess the Significance of the Find, and Perform Treatment or Avoidance as Required.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure V-3: Suspend
Ground-Disturbing Activities if Human Remains are
Encountered and Comply with California Health and
Safety Code Procedures.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure VI-l: Prepare Site-
Specific Geotechnical Report per CBC Requirements and
Implement Appropriate Recommendations.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure VI-3:Monitor
Earthwork during Earthmovir-g Activities.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure VI-5(a): Prepare and
Implement the Appropriate Grading and Erosion Control
Plan.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure VI-s(b): Prepare and
Implement the appropriate Grading and Erosion Conhol
Plan for the detention basin West of Prairie City Road. > Backbone MND Mitigation Nleasure IX-l: Acquire
Appropriate Regulatory Permits and Prepare and
Implement SWPPP and BMPr.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Nleasure VII-I: Greenhouse
Gas Emissions
> Backbone MND Mitigation lvleasure XVI-I: Prepare and
Implement a Construction Traffic Conhol Plan.
> Backbone MND Mitigation IVleasure III-3: North of U.S.

Highway 50 Water Improvements
> Backbone MND Mitigation Nleasure V-4 North of U.S.

Highway 50 Water Improvements
Page l54ofl58

03/25/2025 Item No.13.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure VI-2 North of U.S.

Highway 50 Water Improvements
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure Vl-4 North of U.S.

Highway 50 Water Improvements
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure XII-I North of U.S.

Highway 50 Water Improvements
In addition, the project applicant shall coordinate with owners' group to implementthe following measures detailed in the Revised Proposed Off-Site Water Facility Alternative
Addendum to the FPASP EINEIS (approved December 11,
2012):
> 3B.l-2a: Enhance Exterior Appearance of Structural
Facilities.
> 38.l-2b: Prepare Landscaping Plan.
> 3B.l-3a: Conformance to Cor-struction Lighting Standards. > 38.1-3b: Prepare and Submit a Lighting Master Plan.
> 38.2-la: Develop and Implernent a Construction NOX
Reduction Plan.
> 3B.2-lc: Implement Fugitive Dust Conhol Measures and a Particulate Matter Monitoring Program during
Conshuction.
> 38.2-3a: Cite Pump Siting Buffers Away from Sensitive Receptors.
> 3B.2-3b: Conduct Project-Level DPM Screening and
Implement Measures to Redure Annual DPM to
Acceptable Concentrations.
> 3B.4-1a: Implement GHG ReCuction Measures during
Construction.
> 3B.4-1b Prepare and Implement an Off-site Water
Facilities Climate Action Plan.
> 3A.5-la: Comply with the Programmatic Agreement.
> 3A.5-1b: Perform an Inventory and Evaluation of Cultural Resources for the California Register of Historic Places,

03/25/2025 Item No.13.

Minimize or Avoid Damage or Deshuction, and Perform
Treatment Where Damage or Deshuction Cannot be
Avoided.
> 3A.5-2: Conduct Construction Personnel Education,
Conduct On-Site Monitoring if Required, Stop Work if
Cultural Resources are Discovered, Assess the
Significance of the Find, and Perform Treatment or
Avoidance as Required.
> 34.5-3: Suspend Ground-Dishrrbing Activities if Human Remains are Encountered and Comply with California
Health and Safety Code Procedures.
> 38.7-la: Prepare Geotechnical Report(s) for the Revised Proposed Off-site Water Facilities and Implement
Required Measures.
> 3B.7-lb: Incorporate Pipeline Failure Contingency
Measures Into Final Pipeline Design.
> 38.7-4: Implement Conosion Protection Measures.
> 38.7-5: Conduct Construction Personnel Education, Stop Work if Paleontological Resources are Discovered, Assess the Significance of the Find, ard Prepare and Implement a Recovery Plan as Required.
> 38.8-1a: Transport, Store, and Handle Construction-
Related Hazardous Materials in Compliance with Relevant Regulations and Guidelines.
> 3B.8-lb: Prepare and Implement a Hazardous Materials
Management Plan.
> 3B.8-5a: Conduct Phase I Environmental Site Assessment for Selected Alignment.
> 3B.8-5b: Develop and Implement a Remediation Plan.
> 3B.8-7a: Keep Construction Area Clear of Combustible
Materials.
> 38.8-7b: Provide Accessible Fire Suppression Equipment.

03/25/2025 Item No.13.
> 3B.9-la: Acquire Appropriate Regulatory Permits and
Prepare and Implement SWPPP and BMPs.
> 3B.9-lb: Properly Dispose of Hydrostatic Test Water and Construction Dewatering in Accordance with the Central
Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board.
> 3B.9-3a: Prepare and Implement Drainage Plan(s) for
Structural Facilities.
> 3B.9-3b: Ensure the Provision of Sufficient Outlet
Protection and On-site Containment.
> 38.11-la: Limit Construction Hours.
> 3B.l l-lb: Minimize Noise from Construction Equipment and Staging.
> 38.1 1 -l c: Maximize the Use of Noise Barriers.
> 38.1l-ld: Prohibit Non-Essential Noise Sources During Construction.
> 3B.1l-le: Monitor Construction Noise and Provide a
Mechanism for Filing Noise Complaints.
> 3B.l l-3: Implement Operational Noise Minimization
Measures.
> 3B.12-l: Provide for Continued Recreational Access as Identified in Mitigation Measure 3.14-la.
> 38.15-1a: Prepare Traffic ControlPlan.
> 3B.15-lb: Assess Pre-Off-site Water Facilities Roadway Conditions.
> 38.16-3a: Minimize Utility Conflicts by Implementing an Underground Services Alert.
> 38.16-3b: Coordinate with Utility Providers and
Implement Appropriate Installation Methods to Minimize
Potential Utilib/ Service Disruptions.
> 38.17-la: Implement Construction Dewatering Best
Management Practices.

03/25/2025 Item No.13.
> 3B.17-lb: Implement a Dewatering Discharge Monitoring Program.
> 3A.18-1: Submit Proof of Surface Water Supply
Availability.
> 3A.18-2a: Submit Proof of Adequate Off-Site Water
Conveyance Facilities and Implement Off-Site
Infrastructure Service System or Ensure That Adequate
Financing Is Secured.

03/25/2025 Item No.13.
i i ;:. r ..-{ ,: .i '\'l
Folsom City Council
Staff Re rt
MEETING DATE: 312512025
AGENDA SECTION: New Business
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 11346 - A Resolution of the City of Folsom Approving Revisions to the Repayment Terms of an Approved Affordable Housing Loan in the Amount of $2,700,000 from the City's Housing Fund to Pacific West Communities, Inc., for the Construction of 52 Affordable Housing Units at the Harrington Grove Multifamily Affordable Housing Development
FROM: Community Development Department
RECOMMENDATION i CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Move to Adopt Resolution No. 1 1346 - A Resolution of the City of Folsom Approving Revisions to the Repayment Terms of an Approved Affordable Housing Loan in the Amount of $2,700,000 from the City's Housing Fund to Pacific West Communities, Inc., for the Construction of 52 Affordable Housing Units atthe Harrington Grove Multifamily Affordable Housing Development

BACKGROI IND / ISSITE
On Novemb er 20,2024, the Planning Commission approved a Design Review and Density Bonus application for the Harrington Grove Apartments Project. The Harrington Grove Apartments multifamily project is a new construction, 100 percent affordable multifamily rental development.

It will be constructed on a1.74-acre site located on the west side of Harrington Way, approximately 330 feet south of the intersection of Harrington Way and East Bidwell Street at the address 791 Harrington Way. The approved project consists of 52 one-, two- and three-bedroom units affordable to low-, very-low, and extremely-low-income households.

The project site is located at75I,J7l, and79l Hanington Way in Folsom; south of East Bidwell Street and west of Blue Ravine Road. The neighborhood surrounding the site consists primarily of other multifamily apartment complexes and medical office buildings and located within the East Bidwell Mixed-use overlay. In addition, The development site is strategically located within a half of mile of several amenities. These amenities include full-service grocery stores (Sprouts & Trader Joe's), big-box retail stores (Target and Petco), local retail options (Trail Creek Crossing), 1

03/25/2025 Item No.14.
and healthcare facilities (Mercy Hospital, Bare Pharmacy, Kids Care Dental). Additionally, the site is adjacent to the Humbug Willow Creek Trail, bike and pedestrian pathway.

FIGURE 1: HARNNGTON GROVE PROJECT SITE AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH In the Spring of 2024, West Development Ventures (an affiliate of The Pacific Companies) requested $2.7 million in gap financing from the City to assist with the construction of the proposed Project. In evaluating the applicant's request for an affordable housing loan in the amount of $2.7 million to facilitate the development of a 52-unit affordable multifamily housing project, the City's affordable housing loan consultant, TDA Consulting, Inc. (TDA), conducted a preliminary review of the developer's financial proforma projections and project funding information. The preliminary project's assumptions, methodologies, and calculations were reviewed and evaluated for reasonableness and accuracy. Based on TDA's analysis of a limited set of due diligence documents provided by West Development Ventures including a high-level executive summary, land purchase agreement, conceptual site plan, and early stage proforma TDA found that the proposed Harrington Grove project was generally structured within the range of broadly accepted industry norms for multifamily affordable housing transactions and that the loan amount of $2.7 million was supported as a reasonable amount to support the project.

On July 23,2024, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 11234, conditionally approving an affordable housing loan, in the amount up to $2,700,000, to construct the Harrington Grove Apartments project, with the loan commitment contingent on West Development Ventures securing a 4 percent LIHTC award during the August 2024 round, among other conditions. 2 Page 686
03/25/2025 Item No.14.

On December 11, 2024, the Harrington Grove project successfully secured a bond allocation from the California Debt Limit Allocation Committee (CDLAC). Shortly after, the developer informed the City that some funding sources had changed from what was originally anticipated.

Initially, the developer's proposal included the use of an additional State Tax Credit, which would contribute approximately $4 million in proceeds to the project. The use of the State Tax Credit significantly reduced their funding request to the City. However, during the final application stage, the developer consulted with experts and discovered that the "additional" State Tax Credit would be highly oversubscribed in the August 2024 funding round. Thus, in order to increase their chances of securing the CDLAC Tax-Exempt Bond allocation, the developer opted to apply without the State Tax Credit.

The absence of the additional State Tax Credit created a $4 million funding gap forthe project.

Rather than requesting additional City housing funds, the developer was able to successfully partner with private investors to address the funding shortfall. Due to the low yield and long-term return horizon for the investors, they require repayment of 75 percent of the residual cash flow.

This requires the City to consent to modiS'ing the initially approved loan repayment terms, decreasing the City's repayment obligation from 50 percent to 25 percent of the residual cash flow.

As a result, the City Council is now being asked to approve a modified term sheet, which adjusts the repayment of the $2.7 million loan to 25 percent of residual cash flow, instead of the previously approved 50 percent.

POLICY / RULE
Financial support of affordable housing projects is consistent with the City's Housing Element Goal of facilitating affordable housing.

ANALYSIS
As previously discussed, the developer's initial proposal included the use of additional State Tax Credit, contributing approximately $4 million in proceeds to the project, which significantly reduced their funding request to the Crty andlor the necessity to pivot to a 9 percent allocation to generate additional equity. However, during the final application stage, the developer consulted experts and identified that the "additional" State Credit would be highly oversubscribed in that round. To increase their chances of securing the CDLAC Tax Exempt Bond allocation, the developer opted to apply without the "additional State Credit." This assessment proved to be correct, as out of the I 1 projects in the Northern Region that applied, only 3 were awarded, and none of the awarded projects included state credit requests.

The absence of the "additional" State Credit created a $4 million funding gap for the project. In lieu of requesting additional funds from the City, the developer approached private investors to utilize a Tax Exempt B-Bond Structure that is typically only used on larger projects in high income counties such as San Mateo, Orange, etc. The yield to the investor is low and is not recapitahzed over a very long-time horizon. As such, they require that at least 75 percent of residual cash flow goes to the B-Bond. As such, Pacific West provided an updated pro forma which included the J Page 687
03/25/2025 Item No.14.
aforementioned requirements from the private investor. The original City loan amount of $2,700,000 approved by City Council remained unchanged.

In order to evaluate the applicant's updated pro forma, the City once again engaged the services of TDA Consulting, Inc. TDA conducted a thoughtful review of the developer's updated financial pro forma. The Project's assumptions, methodologies, and calculations were reviewed and evaluated for reasonableness and accuracy. In addition, secondary sources of information (including the term sheet for the B-Bonds) were consulted to confirm or validate the pro forma and additional information was requested of the Project developer to clarifii or support specific items in the updated pro forma.

Based on TDA's analysis, they found the developer's request to be reasonable and did not pose a viability risk. The main change involves the "cost" to the City, which relates to the time-value of repaying the funds. The proposed structure results in the City holding more debt, necessitating refinancing during future recapitalization efforts. Additionally, TDA presented City staff with several recommended revisions to the Term Sheet regarding final disbursement, cost savings provisions, and replacement reserves to benefit the City. These revisions have also been incorporated into the updated Term Sheet.

Given the increasingly competitive nature of securing CDLAC Tax Exempt Bond allocations and the relatively small request of 52.7 million from the City's $22 million of housing funds currently available to assist affordable housing projects, city staff supports the revised repayment loan terms as discussed above and as specified in the Loan Term Sheet for the project (Attachment 4).

The total project development costs are estimated to be approximately $24.3 million, with the majority of the funding expected to come from Tax-Exempt B-Bonds and a permanent loan. The City loan will carry a three percent simple interest rate for a 35-year term. Furthermore, the developer proposes that the loan be repaid with25 percent of residual cash flow.

Loan Terms
A term sheet outlining the conditions of the loan has been prepared and is included in the staff report (Attachment 4). Key specifics of this term sheet include:

1. Loan amount not to exceed $2,700,000

2. 3% simple interest

3. 35-year repayment term

4. Repayment equal to 25o/o of residual cash flow

5. At expiration of the loan term, 1000% of the principal balance of the loan and all accrued interest will be due and payable.

Overall, TDA's analysis of the Project financial proformas and Project details indicates that the requested reduction in loan repayment of 2-5 percent residual cash flow for the $2,750,000 loan is reasonable. Furthermore, given that the Project has entitlements in place and is fuither along in the process, staff is recommending that the City Council approved the revised repayment loan terms as discussed above.
4 Page 688
03/25/2025 Item No.14.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
Funding for the requested affordable housing loan for this project is available from the City's housing funds. The requested funding,52,700,000, will come from the Folsom Housing Fund (Fund 238). The financial impact of making the noted changes to the loan term sheet will result in a delay in repayment of the loan balance of $2,700,000 and accrued interest to Fund 238 and will not impact the City's General Fund. As of March2\25,the City's combined housing fund balance is approximately $22 million in funds available to assist future affordable housing projects.

The above-identified funding will only be provided upon proof, satisfactory to the City, West Development Ventures has financing commitments from all other sources of project financing necessary to fund the project.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The Harrington Grove Multifamily project is exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) by Section 15183 (Projects Consistent with a Community Plan or Zoning) of the CEQA Guidelines.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution No. 1 1346 - A Resolution of the City of Folsom Approving Revisions to the Repayment Terms of an Approved Affordable Housing Loan in the Amount of $2,700,000 from the City's Housing Fund to Pacific West Communities, Inc., for the Construction of 52 Affordable Housing Units at the Harrington Grove Multifamily Affordable Housing Development

2. Loan Term Sheet

3. Site Plan and Project Elevations

4. City Housing Fund Summary
Submitted,
Pam Johns, Community Development Director
5 Page 689
03/25/2025 Item No.14.

ATTACHMENT 1
A Resolution of the City of Folsom Approving Revisions to the Repayment Terms of an Approved Affordable Housing Loan in the Amount of $2,700,000 from the City's Housing Fund to Pacific West Communities, Inc., for the Construction of 52 Affordable Housing Units at the Hanington Grove Multifamily Affordable Hous ing Deve lopment