Folsom City Council
March 10, 2026

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR THE TOLL BROTHERS AT FOLSOM RANCH PROJECT (PN 19-091)

WEST OF EAST BIDWELL ROAD, NORTH OF WHITE ROCK ROAD, EAST OF OAK AVENUE PARKWAY, AND

SOUTH OF MANGINI PARKWAY

GPA, SPA, DA AMENDMENTS, SLVTSM, PD PERMIT, AND INCLUSIONARY HOUSING PLAN # Mitigation
Measures
Condition of Approval When
Required
Responsible
Department
Comments Condition
Satisfied?

87. Centralized Mail Delivery Units
All Final Maps shall show easements or other mapped provisions for the placement of centralized mail delivery units. The owner/applicant shall provide a concrete base for the placement of any centralized mail delivery unit. Specifications and location of such base shall be determined pursuant to the applicable requirements of the U. S. Postal Service and the City of Folsom Community Development Department, with due consideration for street light location, traffic safety, security, and consumer convenience.

M

CD (E)
The final map for this subdivision
includes the required easement for
the placement of centralized mail
delivery units. The USPS will
provide the owner/applicant with the
location of the mail delivery unit and
will provide a concrete pad for the
placement is the specified location in
the subdivision.

Yes.

88. Recorded Final Map
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the owner/applicant shall provide a digital copy of the recorded Final Map (in AutoCAD format) to the Community Development Department. The exception to this requirement are model homes; subject to approval of the Community Development Department, building permits for model homes only may be issued prior to recording of the Final Map.

B

CD (E)
The Community Development
Department shall verify that the
owner/applicant has provided the
required recorded copy of the final
map to the CDD prior to building
permit issuance in the subdivision.

Yes.

89. Recorded Final Map
Prior to issuance of building permits, the owner/applicant shall provide the Folsom-Cordova Unified School District with a copy of the recorded Final Map.

B

CD (P),
FCUSD

The Community Development
Department shall verify that the
owner/applicant has provided the
required recorded copy of the final
map to the FCUSD prior to building
permit issuance in the subdivision.

Yes.

90. Credit Reimbursement Agreement
Prior to the recordation of the first Small-Lot Final Map, the owner/applicant and City shall enter into a credit and reimbursement agreement for constructed improvements that are included in the Folsom Plan Area’s Public Facilities Financing Plan.

M

CD (E)
The owner/applicant has executed all
of the required Specific Plan
Infrastructure Fee
Credit/Reimbursement Agreements
for the Phase 2C subdivision. The
executed agreements are on file with
the Community Development
Department.

Yes.

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR THE TOLL BROTHERS AT FOLSOM RANCH PROJECT (PN 19-091)

WEST OF EAST BIDWELL ROAD, NORTH OF WHITE ROCK ROAD, EAST OF OAK AVENUE PARKWAY, AND

SOUTH OF MANGINI PARKWAY

GPA, SPA, DA AMENDMENTS, SLVTSM, PD PERMIT, AND INCLUSIONARY HOUSING PLAN # Mitigation
Measures
Condition of Approval When
Required
Responsible
Department
Comments Condition
Satisfied?

ARCHITECTURE/SITE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR THE TOLL BROTHERS AT FOLSOM RANCH PROJECT (PN 19-091)

WEST OF EAST BIDWELL ROAD, NORTH OF WHITE ROCK ROAD, EAST OF OAK AVENUE PARKWAY, AND

SOUTH OF MANGINI PARKWAY

GPA, SPA, DA AMENDMENTS, SLVTSM, PD PERMIT, AND INCLUSIONARY HOUSING PLAN # Mitigation
Measures
Condition of Approval When
Required
Responsible
Department
Comments Condition
Satisfied?

91. The Regency Phase 1 portion of the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch project (Lots 1-590 as shown on the Small-Lot Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map) shall comply with the following architecture and design requirements:

1. This approval is for five, one-story master plans in four architectural styles with three color and material options each for the Regency portion of the Toll Brothers project.

The applicant shall submit building plans that comply with this approval and the attached building elevations dated August 30, 2019.

2. The design, materials, and colors of the proposed Regency single-family and townhome residential units shall be consistent with the submitted building elevations, materials samples, and color scheme to the satisfaction of the Community Development Department.

3. The Community Development Department shall approve the individual lot permits to assure no duplication or repetition of the same house, same roof-line, same elevation style, side-by-side, or across the street from each other.

4. All mechanical equipment shall be ground-mounted and concealed from view of public streets, neighboring properties and nearby higher buildings. For lots abutting the open space areas, mechanical equipment shall be located out of view from open space areas.

5. Decorative light fixtures, consistent with the Folsom Ranch Central District Design Guidelines and unique to each architectural design theme, shall be added to the front building elevation of each Master Plan to the satisfaction of the Community Development Department.

6. A minimum of one street shall be planted in the front yard of each residential lot within the subdivision. A minimum of two trees are required along the street-side of all corner lots. All front yard irrigation and landscaping shall be installed prior to a Building Permit Final.

7. A maximum of 25% of the townhome product located on interior lots shall been permitted to have a side entry at the primary entrance location to the residence.

B

CD (P) (B)
The Community Development
Department will review and approve
all site and building plans in the
subdivision to verify compliance
with this condition prior to building
permit issuance on all lots in the
subdivision.
.Yes

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR THE TOLL BROTHERS AT FOLSOM RANCH PROJECT (PN 19-091)

WEST OF EAST BIDWELL ROAD, NORTH OF WHITE ROCK ROAD, EAST OF OAK AVENUE PARKWAY, AND

SOUTH OF MANGINI PARKWAY

GPA, SPA, DA AMENDMENTS, SLVTSM, PD PERMIT, AND INCLUSIONARY HOUSING PLAN # Mitigation
Measures
Condition of Approval When
Required
Responsible
Department
Comments Condition
Satisfied?

92. Design Review Approval
Prior to issuance of a building permit for any residential units within the traditional Subdivisions (Lots 1-214 as shown on the Small-Lot Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map) and Regency Phase 2 (421 unmapped residential units) portions of the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch project, the owner/applicant shall obtain Design Review and/or Planned Development approval from the Planning Commission for all residences to be built within the aforementioned portions of the project area. If the architecture is not consistent with the Folsom Ranch Central District Design Guidelines, the owner applicant may modify the plans or apply for a modification to the Design Guidelines to be reviewed by the Planning Commission.

In addition, the final design of the clubhouse within the Regency Phase 1 portion of the project shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Commission. If other clubhouse structures are proposed with the Regency Phase 2 portion of the project or the traditional Subdivision portion of the project, they will also be subject to review and approval by the Planning Commission.

B

CD (P) PR
This condition has been satisfied
with the approval of the Phase 2C
design review by the Planning
Commission.

Yes

93. Mechanical Equipment Screening
All mechanical equipment shall be concealed from view of public and private streets, neighboring properties and nearby higher buildings where practicable to the satisfaction of the Community Development Department.

B

CD (P) (E)
The Community Development
Department will review and approve
all site and building plans in the
subdivision to verify compliance
with this condition prior to building
permit issuance on all lots in the
subdivision.

Yes

PARKS AND RECREATION REQUIREMENTS

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR THE TOLL BROTHERS AT FOLSOM RANCH PROJECT (PN 19-091)

WEST OF EAST BIDWELL ROAD, NORTH OF WHITE ROCK ROAD, EAST OF OAK AVENUE PARKWAY, AND

SOUTH OF MANGINI PARKWAY

GPA, SPA, DA AMENDMENTS, SLVTSM, PD PERMIT, AND INCLUSIONARY HOUSING PLAN # Mitigation
Measures
Condition of Approval When
Required
Responsible
Department
Comments Condition
Satisfied?

94. The owner/applicant shall modify the FPASP Land Use Plan and Parks Plan to identify the relocated public park lands that are outside of the project area prior to issuance of the first building permit for Regency Phase 1. The relocated parklands shall include 8 acres adjacent to the planned Local Park No. 4 (LP4) which is 2.3 acres in size, resulting in a 10.3-acre park site.

The remaining 2 acres shall be relocated adjacent to Local Park No. 2 (LP2) which is 1.1 acres in size, resulting in a 3.1-acre park site. Final parkland location and size shall be approved by the Parks and Recreation Director.

B CD (E) (P),
PR
The owner/applicant has modified
the FPASP Land Use Plan and Parks
Plan for the required park land
transfers and the modified plans are
on file with the Community
Development Department.

Yes

95. The owner/applicant shall provide 7.5-acres of private recreation facilities within the “Regency” Phase 1 Subdivision (Lot D: 5.0-acres)(Lot G: 0.5-acres)(Lot F: 0.5-acres) and “Traditional Homes” Subdivision (Lot E: 1.5-acres) portions of the proposed project as shown on the Small Lot Vesting Tentative Subdivision Maps. The final size and location of the private amenity within the “Regency” Phase 2 Subdivision as shown on the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Master Plan Exhibit will be determined with approval of the future entitlements associated with “Regency” Phase 2.

M, OG CD (E) (P),
PR
The final map for this subdivision
includes the creation of Lot W and
includes a note that Lot D will be
granted to the Regency HOA by
separate instrument. The other lots in
Phase 1 will be created with future
phased maps in the Regency project.

Yes

96. Prior to issuance of the last building permit (342nd building permit) within Phase 1B of the Regency Phase 1 Active-Adult Community as shown on the Conceptual Phasing Exhibit, dated January 24, 2020, the owner/applicant shall begin construction of the private amenity and maintain continual progress until completion.

B, OG CD (E) (P),
PR
The private amenity has been
completed.

Yes

97. Prior to issuance of the last building permit (590th building permit) in Phase 1C of the Regency Phase 1 Active-Adult Community as shown on the Conceptual Phasing Exhibit, dated January 24, 2029, the owner/applicant shall begin construction of the two private dog-park amenities and maintain continual progress until completion. B, OG CD (E) (P), PR
The Community Development
Department will monitor the
progress of development of the
Regency age-restricted project to
verify compliance with this
condition.

Yes.

98. Prior to issuance of the 137th building permit within Traditional Subdivision portion of the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch project, the owner/applicant shall begin construction of the private amenity and maintain continual progress until completion. B, OG CD (E) (P), PR
The Community Development and
Parks Departments will monitor the
development of the project to verify
compliance with this condition.

Yes.

99. Prior to the issuance of the last building permit within Regency Phase 1, the owner/applicant shall complete grading of the public trails on Lots H, I, J, and N, and the Class 1 trail parallel to Mangini Parkway on Lots Q and R, as shown on the Toll Brothers Public Trails System Modification Exhibit and Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map, dated January 24, 2020.

B CD (E) (P),
PR
The Community Development and
Parks Departments will monitor the
development of the project to verify
compliance with this condition.

Yes.

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR THE TOLL BROTHERS AT FOLSOM RANCH PROJECT (PN 19-091)

WEST OF EAST BIDWELL ROAD, NORTH OF WHITE ROCK ROAD, EAST OF OAK AVENUE PARKWAY, AND

SOUTH OF MANGINI PARKWAY

GPA, SPA, DA AMENDMENTS, SLVTSM, PD PERMIT, AND INCLUSIONARY HOUSING PLAN # Mitigation
Measures
Condition of Approval When
Required
Responsible
Department
Comments Condition
Satisfied?
100. The owner/applicant shall include the maintenance of all graded subdivision trails and completed Class I trail parallel to Mangini Parkway within the responsibility of the development Homeowner’s Association (HOA) until the Open Space is deeded to the City.

The City shall not incur any maintenance responsibility or expense as a result of these trails until the transfer of Open Space ownership to the City is complete.

G, I, OG CD (E) (P),
PR
The Community Development and
Parks Departments will monitor the
development of the project to verify
compliance with this condition.

Yes.
101. The owner/applicant shall include the maintenance of all private trail connections within the responsibility of the development Homeowner’s Association (HOA) in perpetuity. The City shall not incur any maintenance responsibility or expense as a result of these private trail connections to the public trails within the subdivision.

G, I, OG CD (E) (P),
PR
The Community Development and
Parks Departments will monitor the
development of the project to verify
compliance with this condition.

Yes.
102. The owner/applicant shall include the maintenance of all 86.1-acres of Open Space (Measure W Open Space) and fuel modification buffers, in accordance with the Folsom Plan Area Open Space Master Plan, within the responsibility of the development Homeowner’s Association (HOA) until the Open Space is deeded to the City. The City shall not incur any maintenance responsibility or expense as a result of this Open Space until the transfer of Open Space ownership to the City is complete. In addition, the Open Space shall not be deeded to the City until development on both sides adjacent to the Open Space are complete and at such a time the City is ready to take ownership.

OG CD (E) (P),
PR
The Community Development and
Parks Departments will monitor the
development of the project to verify
compliance with this condition.

Yes.
103. Parkland dedications shall be calculated as net acreage.

G, I CD (E) (P),
PR
The Community Development and
Parks Departments will monitor the
development of the project to verify
compliance with this condition.

Yes.

MISCELLANEOUS REQUIREMENTS
104. The owner/applicant shall update the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan to reflect all changes and modifications to the General Plan Land Use and Specific Plan Land Use diagrams, tables, and exhibits to reflect changes resulting from the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch project prior to issuance of the first building permit to the satisfaction of the Community Development Department.

B CD (E) (P),
PR
The owner/applicant has modified
the FPASP Land Use Plan and Parks
Plan for the required park land
transfers and the modified plans are
on file with the Community
Development Department.

Yes

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR THE TOLL BROTHERS AT FOLSOM RANCH PROJECT (PN 19-091)

WEST OF EAST BIDWELL ROAD, NORTH OF WHITE ROCK ROAD, EAST OF OAK AVENUE PARKWAY, AND

SOUTH OF MANGINI PARKWAY

GPA, SPA, DA AMENDMENTS, SLVTSM, PD PERMIT, AND INCLUSIONARY HOUSING PLAN # Mitigation
Measures
Condition of Approval When
Required
Responsible
Department
Comments Condition
Satisfied?
105. The Regency Phase 1 (Lots 1-590 as shown on the Small-Lot Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map dated October 17, 2019) and the Regency Phase 2 unmapped portions of the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch project shall be limited to age-restricted (Age 55+) residential units. OG CD (E) (P) The Community Development
Department has reviewed and
approved the CC&R’s for the
subdivision that include this
restriction and will monitor the
project to ensure compliance.

Yes

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

Mitigation Measures

19. Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Project Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program (MMRP). Table 1 below describes the mitigation measures from the FPASP (May 2011) MMRP, as amended by the Revised Proposed Water Supply Facility Alternative (November 2012), Folsom South of U.S.

Highway 50 Backbone Infrastructure Mitigated Negative Declaration (December 2014), the Westland Eagle Specific Plan Amendment (September 2015), and the Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch Project.

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR THE TOLL BROTHERS AT FOLSOM RANCH PROJECT (PN 19-091)

WEST OF EAST BIDWELL ROAD, NORTH OF WHITE ROCK ROAD, EAST OF OAK AVENUE PARKWAY, AND

SOUTH OF MANGINI PARKWAY

GPA, SPA, DA AMENDMENTS, SLVTSM, PD PERMIT, AND INCLUSIONARY HOUSING PLAN # Mitigation
Number
(Source)
Mitigation Measures Timing Responsible
Agency
Comments Condition
Satisfied?
Aesthetics
106
-1
3A.1-1
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Construct and Maintain a Landscape Corridor Adjacent to U.S. 50. The project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application adjacent to U.S. 50 shall fund, construct, and maintain a landscaped corridor within the SPA, south of U.S. 50. This corridor shall be 50 feet wide, except that the landscaped corridor width shall be reduced to 25 feet adjacent to the proposed regional mall. Landscaping plans and specifications shall be approved by Caltrans and the City of Folsom, and constructed by the project applicant(s) before the start of earthmoving activities associated with residential or commercial units.

Landscaped areas would not be required within the preserved oak woodlands. As practicable, landscaping shall primarily contain native and/or drought tolerant plants. Landscaped corridors shall be maintained in perpetuity to the satisfaction of the City of Folsom.

1. Plans and
specifications:
before approval
of grading plans
and building
permits

2. Construction:
before the
approval of
occupancy
permits
associated with
residential and
commercial
units

3. Maintenance:
in perpetuity
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The Toll Brothers at Folsom Ranch
subdivision does not have any frontage
along US HWY 50 and therefore this
condition does not apply to the
subdivision.

106
-2
3A.1-4 (FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Screen Construction Staging Areas. The project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application shall locate staging and material storage areas as far away from sensitive biological resources and sensitive land uses (e.g., residential areas, schools, parks) as feasible. Staging and material storage areas shall be approved by the appropriate agency (identified below) before the approval of grading plans for all project phases and shall be screened from adjacent occupied land uses in earlier development phases to the maximum extent practicable. Screens may include, but are not limited to, the use of such visual barriers such as berms or fences. The screen design shall be approved by the appropriate agency to further reduce visual effects to the extent possible.

Before approval
of grading plans
and during
construction for
all project
phases.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department.

The construction staging area for the
subdivision is not located near any
existing sensitive biological resources,
land uses or existing residences. The
construction area is shown on the plans
for the subdivision and the plans have
been approved by the Community
Development Department.

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom’s jurisdictional boundaries shall be developed by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase in consultation with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or Sacramento Counties, and Caltrans) to reduce to the extent feasible the visual effects of construction activities on adjacent project land uses that have already been developed.
106
-3
3A.1-5 (FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Establish and Require Conformance to Lighting Standards and Prepare and Implement a Lighting Plan.

To reduce impacts associated with light and glare, the City shall:
 Establish standards for on-site outdoor lighting to reduce high-intensity nighttime lighting and glare as part of the Folsom Specific Plan design guidelines/standards. Consideration shall be given to design features, namely directional shielding for street lighting, parking lot lighting, and other substantial light sources, that would reduce effects of nighttime lighting. In addition, consideration shall be given to the use of automatic shutoffs or motion sensors for lighting features to further reduce excess nighttime light.  Use shielded or screened public lighting fixtures to prevent the light from shining off of the surface intended to be illuminated.

To reduce impacts associated with light and glare, the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall:
 Shield or screen lighting fixtures to direct the light downward and prevent light spill on adjacent properties.
 Flood and area lighting needed for construction activities, nighttime sporting activities, and/or security shall be screened or aimed no higher than 45 degrees above straight down (half-way between straight down and straight to the side) when the source is visible from any off-site residential property or public roadway.
 For public lighting in residential neighborhoods, prohibit the use of light fixtures that are of unusually high intensity or brightness (e.g., harsh mercury vapor, low-pressure sodium, or fluorescent bulbs) or that blink or flash.
 Use appropriate building materials (such as low-glare glass, low-glare building glaze or finish, neutral, earth-toned colored paint and roofing materials), shielded or screened lighting, and appropriate signage in the office/commercial areas to prevent light and glare from adversely affecting motorists on nearby roadways.
 Design exterior on-site lighting as an integral part of the building and landscape design in the Folsom Specific Plan area. Lighting fixtures shall be architecturally consistent with the overall site design.  Lighting of off-site facilities within the City of Folsom shall be consistent with the City’s General Plan standards.
 Lighting of the off-site detention basin shall be consistent with Sacramento County General Plan standards.

Before approval
of building
permits.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The Community Development
Department (CDD) has reviewed and
approved lighting plans for subdivision.

The plans are in compliance with the
condition of approval.

Yes

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

 Lighting of the two local roadway connections from Folsom Heights off-site into El Dorado Hills shall be consistent with El Dorado County General Plan standards.

A lighting plan for all on- and off-site elements within the each agency’s jurisdictional boundaries (specified below) shall be submitted to the relevant jurisdictional agency for review and approval, which shall include the above elements. The lighting plan may be submitted concurrently with other improvement plans, and shall be submitted before the installation of any lighting or the approval of building permits for each phase.

The project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application shall implement the approved lighting plan.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom’s jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or Sacramento Counties).

Air Quality
106
-4
3A.2-1a
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Implement Measures to Control Air Pollutant Emissions Generated by Construction of On-Site Elements. To reduce short-term construction emissions, the project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application shall require their contractors to implement SMAQMD’s list of Basic Construction Emission Control Practices, Enhanced Fugitive PM Dust Control Practices, and Enhanced Exhaust Control Practices (list below) in effect at the time individual portions of the site undergo construction. In addition to SMAQMD-recommended measures, construction operations shall comply with all applicable SMAQMD rules and regulations.

Basic Construction Emission Control Practices
 Water all exposed surfaces two times daily. Exposed surfaces include, but are not limited to soil piles, graded areas, unpaved parking areas, staging areas, and access roads.  Cover or maintain at least two feet of free board space on haul trucks transporting soil, sand, or other loose material on the site. Any haul trucks that would be traveling along freeways or major roadways should be covered.
 Use wet power vacuum street sweepers to remove any visible trackout mud or dirt onto adjacent public roads at least once a day. Use of dry power sweeping is prohibited.  Limit vehicle speeds on unpaved roads to 15 miles per hour (mph).  All roadways, driveways, sidewalks, parking lots to be paved should be completed as soon as possible.

In addition, building pads should be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used.
 Minimize idling time either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the time of idling to 5 minutes (as required by the state airborne toxics control measure [Title 13, Section 2485 of the California Code of Regulations]). Provide clear signage that posts this requirement for workers at the entrances to the site.

Before the
approval of all
grading plans
by the City and
throughout
project
construction,
where
applicable, for
all project
phases.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The City and its Environmental
Compliance Consultant (Helix) have
reviewed all MMRP conditions and
verified compliance with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance was verified prior
to commencement of grading and
construction in the Summer of 2020. The
compliance table is on file with the City
.

Yes

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

 Maintain all construction equipment in proper working condition according to manufacturer’s specifications. The equipment must be checked by a certified mechanic and determine to be running in proper condition before it is operated.

Enhanced Fugitive PM Dust Control Practices – Soil Disturbance Areas  Water exposed soil with adequate frequency for continued moist soil. However, do not overwater to the extent that sediment flows off the site.
 Suspend excavation, grading, and/or demolition activity when wind speeds exceed 20 mph.  Plant vegetative ground cover (fast-germinating native grass seed) in disturbed areas as soon as possible.

Water appropriately until vegetation is established.

Enhanced Fugitive PM Dust Control Practices – Unpaved Roads  Install wheel washers for all exiting trucks, or wash off all trucks and equipment leaving the site.  Treat site accesses to a distance of 100 feet from the paved road with a 6 to 12-inch layer of wood chips, mulch, or gravel to reduce generation of road dust and road dust carryout onto public roads.  Post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact at the construction site regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond and take corrective action within 48 hours. The phone number of SMAQMD and the City contact person shall also be posted to ensure compliance.

Enhanced Exhaust Control Practices
 The project shall provide a plan, for approval by the City of Folsom Community Development Department and SMAQMD, demonstrating that the heavy-duty (50 horsepower [hp] or more) off-road vehicles to be used in the construction project, including owned, leased, and subcontractor vehicles, will achieve a project wide fleet-average 20% NOX reduction and 45% particulate reduction compared to the most current California Air Resources Board (ARB) fleet average that exists at the time of construction.

Acceptable options for reducing emissions may include use of late-model engines, low-emission diesel products, alternative fuels, engine retrofit technology, after-treatment products, and/or other options as they become available. The project applicant(s) of each project phase or its representative shall submit to the City of Folsom Community Development Department and SMAQMD a comprehensive inventory of all off-road construction equipment, equal to or greater than 50 hp, that would be used an aggregate of 40 or more hours during any portion of the construction project. The inventory shall include the horsepower rating, engine production year, and projected hours of use for each piece of equipment. The inventory shall be updated and submitted monthly throughout the duration of the project, except that an inventory shall not be required for any 30-day period in which no construction activity occurs. At least 48 hours prior to the use of heavy-duty off-road equipment, the project representative shall provide SMAQMD with the anticipated construction timeline including start date, and name and phone number of the project manager and on-site foreman. SMAQMD’s Construction Mitigation Calculator can be used to identify an equipment fleet that achieves this reduction (SMAQMD 2007a). The project shall ensure that emissions from all off- road diesel powered equipment used on the SPA do not exceed 40% opacity for more than three minutes in any one hour. Any equipment found to exceed 40 percent opacity (or Ringelmann 2.0) shall be repaired

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

immediately, and the City and SMAQMD shall be notified within 48 hours of identification of noncompliant equipment. A visual survey of all in-operation equipment shall be made at least weekly, and a monthly summary of the visual survey results shall be submitted throughout the duration of the project, except that the monthly summary shall not be required for any 30-day period in which no construction activity occurs. The monthly summary shall include the quantity and type of vehicles surveyed as well as the dates of each survey. SMAQMD staff and/or other officials may conduct periodic site inspections to determine compliance. Nothing in this mitigation measure shall supersede other SMAQMD or state rules or regulations.
 If at the time of construction, SMAQMD has adopted a regulation or new guidance applicable to construction emissions, compliance with the regulation or new guidance may completely or partially replace this mitigation if it is equal to or more effective than the mitigation contained herein, and if SMAQMD so permits.
106
-5
3A.2-1b
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Pay Off-site Mitigation Fee to SMAQMD to Off-Set NOX Emissions Generated by Construction of On- Site Elements.

Implementation of the project or the other four other action alternatives would result in construction- generated NO
X emissions that exceed the SMAQMD threshold of significance, even after implementation of the SMAQMD Enhanced Exhaust Control Practices (listed in Mitigation Measure 3A.2-1a). Additionally, Mitigation Measure 3A.4-1 (Implement Additional Measures to Control Construction-Generated GHG Emissions, pages 3A.4-14 to 15) has the potential to both reduce and increase NOX emissions, depending on the types of alternative fuels and engine types employed. Therefore, the project applicant(s) shall pay SMAQMD an off-site mitigation fee for implementation of any of the five action alternatives for the purpose of reducing NOX emissions to a less-than-significant level (i.e., less than 85 lb/day). All NOX emission reductions and increases associated with GHG mitigation shall be added to or subtracted from the amount above the construction threshold to determine off-site mitigation fees, when possible. The specific fee amounts shall be calculated when the daily construction emissions can be more accurately determined: that is, if the City/USACE select and certify the EIR/EIS and approves the Proposed Project or one of the other four other action alternatives, the City and the applicants must establish the phasing by which development would occur, and the applicants must develop a detailed construction schedule. Calculation of fees associated with each project development phase shall be conducted by the project applicant(s) in consultation with SMAQMD staff before the approval of grading plans by the City. The project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application shall pay into SMAQMD’s off-site construction mitigation fund to further mitigate construction generated emissions of NO X that exceed SMAQMD’s daily emission threshold
of 85 lb/day. The calculation of daily NOX emissions shall be based on the cost rate established by SMAQMD at the time the calculation and payment are made. At the time of writing this EIR/EIS the cost rate is $16,000 to reduce 1 ton of NOX plus a 5% administrative fee (SMAQMD 2008c). The determination of the final mitigation fee shall be conducted in coordination with SMAQMD before any ground disturbance occurs for any project phase. Based on information available at the time of writing this EIR/EIS, and assuming that construction would be performed at a consistent rate over a 19-year period (and averaging of 22 work days per month), it is estimated that the off-site construction mitigation fees would range from $517,410 to $824,149, depending on which alternative is selected. Because the fee is based on the mass Before the
approval of all
grading plans
by the City and
throughout
project
construction for
all project
phases.

The City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
shall not grant
any grading
permits to the
respective
project
applicant(s)
until the
respective
project
applicant(s)
have paid the
appropriate off-
site mitigation
fee to
SMAQMD.

The City and its Environmental
Compliance Consultant (Helix) have
reviewed all MMRP conditions and
verified compliance with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance was verified prior
to commencement of grading and
construction in the Summer of 2020. The
compliance table is on file with the City
.

Yes

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

quantity of emissions that exceed SMAQMD’s daily threshold of significance of 85 lb/day, total fees would be substantially greater if construction activity is more intense during some phases and less intense during other phases of the 19-year build out period, and in any event, based on the actual cost rate applied by SMAQMD. (This fee is used by SMAQMD to purchase off-site emissions reductions. Such purchases are made through SMAQMD’s Heavy Duty Incentive Program, through which select owners of heavy-duty equipment in Sacramento County can repower or retrofit their old engines with cleaner engines or technologies.)
106
-6
3A.2-1c
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Analyze and Disclose Projected PM10 Emission Concentrations at Nearby Sensitive Receptors Resulting from Construction of On-Site Elements. Prior to construction of each discretionary development entitlement of on-site land uses, the project applicant shall perform a project-level CEQA analysis (e.g., supporting documentation for an exemption, negative declaration, or project-specific EIR) that includes detailed dispersion modeling of construction-generated PM10 to disclose what PM10 concentrations would be at nearby sensitive receptors. The dispersion modeling shall be performed in accordance with applicable SMAQMD guidance that is in place at the time the analysis is performed. At the time of writing this EIR/EIS, SMAQMD’s most current and most detailed guidance for addressing construction-generated PM 10 emissions
is found in its Guide to Air Quality Assessment in Sacramento County (SMAQMD 2009a). The project-level analysis shall incorporate detailed parameters of the construction equipment and activities, including the year during which construction would be performed, as well as the proximity of potentially affected receptors, including receptors proposed by the project that exist at the time the construction activity would occur.

Before the
approval of all
grading plans
by the City.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The City and its Environmental
Compliance Consultant (Helix) have
reviewed all MMRP conditions and
verified compliance with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance was verified prior
to commencement of grading and
construction in the Summer of 2020. The
compliance table is on file with the City
.

Yes
106
-7
3A.2-2 (FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Implement All Measures Prescribed by the Air Quality Mitigation Plan to Reduce Operational Air Pollutant Emissions. To reduce operational emissions, the project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application shall implement all measures prescribed in the SMAQMD-approved Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan Air Quality Mitigation Plan (AQMP) (Torrence Planning 2008), a copy of which is included in Appendix C2. The AQMP is intended to improve mobility, reduce vehicle miles traveled, and improve air quality as required by AB 32 and SB 375. The AQMP includes, among others, measures designed to provide bicycle parking at commercial land uses, an integrated pedestrian/bicycle path network, transit stops with shelters, a prohibition against the use the wood-burning fireplaces, energy star roofing materials, electric lawnmowers provided to homeowners at no charge, and on-site transportation alternatives to passenger vehicles (including light rail) that provide connectivity with other local and regional alternative transportation networks.

Before issuance
of subdivision
maps or
improvement
plans.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The City and its Environmental
Compliance Consultant (Helix) have
reviewed all MMRP conditions and
verified compliance with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance was verified prior
to commencement of grading and
construction in the Summer of 2020. The
compliance table is on file with the City
.

Yes
106
-8
3A.2-4a
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Develop and Implement a Plan to Reduce Exposure of Sensitive Receptors to Construction-Generated Toxic Air Contaminant Emissions. The project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application shall develop a plan to reduce the exposure of sensitive receptors to TACs generated by project construction activity associated with buildout of the selected alternative. Each plan shall be developed by the project applicant(s) in consultation with SMAQMD. The plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval before the approval of any grading plans.

The plan may include such measures as scheduling activities when the residences are the least likely to be occupied, requiring equipment to be shut off when not in use, and prohibiting heavy trucks from idling.

Applicable measures shall be included in all project plans and specifications for all project phases.

The implementation and enforcement of all measures identified in each plan shall be funded by the project applicant(s) for the respective phase of development.

Before the
approval of all
grading plans
by the City and
throughout
project
construction,
where
applicable, for
all project
phases.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The City and its Environmental
Compliance Consultant (Helix) have
reviewed all MMRP conditions and
verified compliance with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance was verified prior
to commencement of grading and
construction in the Summer of 2020. The
compliance table is on file with the City
.

Yes

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

106
-9
3A.2-4b
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Implement Measures to Reduce Exposure of Sensitive Receptors to Operational Emissions of Toxic Air Contaminants. The following measures shall be implemented to reduce exposure of sensitive receptors to Toxic Air Contaminants.
 Proposed commercial and industrial land uses that have the potential to emit TACs or host TAC- generating activity (e.g., loading docks) shall be located away from existing and proposed on-site sensitive receptors such that they do not expose sensitive receptors to TAC emissions that exceed an incremental increase of 10 in 1 million for the cancer risk and/or a noncarcinogenic Hazard Index of 1.0.  The multi-family residences planned across from the off-site corporation yard near the southwest corner of the SPA shall be set back as far as possible from the boundary of the corporation yard and/or relocated to another area.
 Where necessary to reduce exposure of sensitive receptors to an incremental increase of 10 in 1 million for the cancer risk and/or a noncarcinogenic Hazard Index of 1.0, proposed commercial and industrial land uses that would host diesel trucks shall incorporate idle reduction strategies that reduce the main propulsion engine idling time through alternative technologies such as, IdleAire, electrification of truck parking, and alternative energy sources for TRUs, to allow diesel engines to be completely turned off.  Signs shall be posted in at all loading docks and truck loading areas which indicate that diesel-powered delivery trucks must be shut off when not in use for longer than 5 minutes on the premises in order to reduce idling emissions. This measure is consistent with the ATCM to Limit Diesel-Fueled Commercial Motor Vehicle Idling, which was approved by the California Office of Administrative Law in January 2005.
 Implement the following additional guidelines, which are recommended in ARB’s Land Use Handbook:

A Community Health Perspective (ARB 2005) and are considered to be advisory and not regulatory:
 Sensitive receptors, such as residential units and daycare centers, shall not be located in the same building as dry-cleaning operations that use perchloroethylene. Dry-cleaning operations that use perchloroethylene shall not be located within 300 feet of any sensitive receptor. A setback of 500 feet shall be provided for operations with two or more machines.  Large gasoline stations (defined as facilities with a throughput of 3.6 million gallons per year or greater) and sensitive land uses shall not be sited within 300 feet of each other. Small gasoline-dispensing facilities (less than 3.6 million gallons of throughput per year) and sensitive land uses shall not be sited within 50 feet of each other.

Before the
approval of all
grading plans
by the
SMAQMD and
throughout
project
construction,
where
applicable, for
all project
phases.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The City and its Environmental
Compliance Consultant (Helix) have
reviewed all MMRP conditions and
verified compliance with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance was verified prior
to commencement of grading and
construction in the Summer of 2020. The
compliance table is on file with the City.

Yes
106
-10
3A.2-5 (FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Implement A Site Investigation to Determine the Presence of NOA and, if necessary, Prepare and Implement an Asbestos Dust Control Plan. A site investigation shall be performed to determine whether and where NOA is present in the soil and rock on the SPA. The site investigation shall include the collection of soil and rock samples by a qualified geologist. If the site investigation determines that NOA is present on the SPA then the project applicant shall prepare an Asbestos Dust Control Plan for approval by SMAQMD as required in Title 17, Section 93105 of the California Code of Regulations, “Asbestos Airborne Toxic Control Measure for Construction, Grading, Quarrying, and Surface Mining Operations.” The Asbestos Dust Control Plan shall specify measures, such as periodic watering to reduce airborne dust and ceasing construction Before the
approval of all
grading plans
by the City and
throughout
project
construction,
where
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The owner/applicant obtained approval
for an Asbestos Dust Mitigation Plan
from the SMAQMD prior to
commencement of grading and
construction in the Summer of 2020. The
approved Asbestos Dust Mitigation Plan
is on file with the Community
Development Department.

Yes

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

during high winds. Measures in the Asbestos Dust Control Plan may include but shall not be limited to dust control measures required by Mitigation Measure 3A.2-1a. The project applicant shall submit the plan to the Folsom Community Development Department for review and SMAQMD for review and approval before construction of the first project phase. SMAQMD approval of the plan must be received before any asbestos- containing rock (serpentinite) can be disturbed. Upon approval of the Asbestos Dust Control Plan by SMAQMD, the applicant shall ensure that construction contractors implement the terms of the plan throughout the construction period.
applicable, for
all project
phases.
106
-11
3A.2-6 (FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Implement Measures to Control Exposure of Sensitive Receptors to Operational Odorous Emissions.

The project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application shall implement the following measures:
 The odor-producing potential of land uses shall be considered when the exact type of facility that would occupy areas zoned for commercial, industrial, or mixed-use land uses is determined. Facilities that have the potential to emit objectionable odors shall be located as far away as feasible from existing and proposed sensitive receptors.
 The multi-family residences planned across from the off-site corporation yard near the southwest corner of the SPA shall be set back as far as possible from the boundary of the corporation yard and/or relocated to another area. (This measure is also required by Mitigation Measure 3A.2-4b to limit exposure to TAC emissions.)
 Before the approval of building permits, odor control devices shall be identified to mitigate the exposure of receptors to objectionable odors if a potential odor-producing source is to occupy an area zoned for commercial, industrial, or mixed-use land uses. The identified odor control devices shall be installed before the issuance of certificates of occupancy for the potentially odor-producing use. The odor producing potential of a source and control devices shall be determined in coordination with SMAQMD and based on the number of complaints associated with existing sources of the same nature.  The deeds to all properties located within the plan area that are within one mile of an on- or off-site area zoned or used for agricultural use (including livestock grazing) shall be accompanied by a written disclosure from the transferor, in a form approved by the City of Folsom, advising any transferee of the potential adverse odor impacts from surrounding agricultural operations, which disclosure shall direct the transferee to contact the County of Sacramento concerning any such property within the County zoned for agricultural uses within one mile of the subject property being transferred.  Truck loading docks and delivery areas shall be located as far away as feasible from existing and proposed sensitive receptors.
 Signs shall be posted at all loading docks and truck loading areas which indicate that diesel-powered delivery trucks must be shut off when not in use for longer than 5 minutes on the premises in order to reduce idling emissions. This measure is consistent with the ATCM to Limit Diesel-Fueled Commercial Motor Vehicle Idling, which was approved by California’s Office of Administrative Law in January 2005. (This measure is also required by Mitigation Measure 3A.2-4b to limit TAC emissions.) Before the
approval of
building
permits by the
City and
throughout
project
construction,
where
applicable, for
all project
phases.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The City and its Environmental
Compliance Consultant (Helix) have
reviewed all MMRP conditions and
verified compliance with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance was verified prior
to commencement of grading and
construction in the Summer of 2020.

This subdivision is residential and is not
adjacent to any odorous land uses and is
not adjacent to the future Corporation
Yard
.

Yes

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

 Proposed commercial and industrial land uses that have the potential to host diesel trucks shall incorporate idle reduction strategies that reduce the main propulsion engine idling time through alternative technologies such as, IdleAire, electrification of truck parking, and alternative energy sources for TRUs, to allow diesel engines to be completely turned off. (This measure is also required by Mitigation Measure 3A.2-4b to limit TAC emissions.)
Biological Resources
106
-12
3A.3-1a
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Design Stormwater Drainage Plans and Erosion and Sediment Control Plans to Avoid and Minimize Erosion and Runoff to All Wetlands and Other Waters That Are to Remain on the SPA and Use Low Impact Development Features.

To minimize indirect effects on water quality and wetland hydrology, the project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application shall include stormwater drainage plans and erosion and sediment control plans in their improvement plans and shall submit these plans to the City Public Works Department for review and approval. For off-site elements within Sacramento County or El Dorado County jurisdiction (e.g., off-site detention basin and off-site roadway connections to El Dorado Hills), plans shall be submitted to the appropriate county planning department. Before approval of these improvement plans, the project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application shall obtain a NPDES MS4 Municipal Stormwater Permit and Grading Permit, comply with the City’s Grading Ordinance and County drainage and stormwater quality standards, and commit to implementing all measures in their drainage plans and erosion and sediment control plans to avoid and minimize erosion and runoff into Alder Creek and all wetlands and other waters that would remain on-site. Detailed information about stormwater runoff standards and relevant City and County regulation is provided in Chapter 3A.9, “Hydrology and Water Quality.” The project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development entitlement shall implement stormwater quality treatment controls consistent with the Stormwater Quality Design Manual for Sacramento and South Placer Regions in effect at the time the application is submitted. Appropriate runoff controls such as berms, storm gates, off-stream detention basins, overflow collection areas, filtration systems, and sediment traps shall be implemented to control siltation and the potential discharge of pollutants. Development plans shall incorporate Low Impact Development (LID) features, such as pervious strips, permeable pavements, bioretention ponds, vegetated swales, disconnected rain gutter downspouts, and rain gardens, where appropriate. Use of LID features is recommended by the EPA to minimize impacts on water quality, hydrology, and stream geomorphology and is specified as a method for protecting water quality in the proposed specific plan. In addition, free spanning bridge systems shall be used for all roadway crossings over wetlands and other waters that are retained in the on-site open space. These bridge systems would maintain the natural and restored channels of creeks, including the associated wetlands, and would be designed with sufficient span width and depth to provide for wildlife movement along the creek corridors even during high- flow or flood events, as specified in the 404 permit.

In addition to compliance with City ordinances, the project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application shall prepare a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), and implement Best Management Practices (BMPs) that comply with the General Construction Stormwater Permit from the Before approval
of improvement
and drainage
plans, and on an
ongoing basis
throughout and
after project
construction, as
required for all
project phases.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The Owner/applicant has received a
NPDES permit from the State
Regional Water Quality Control
Board (SRWQCB). The NDES
Permit requires the implementation
of BMP’s, monitoring and reporting
for stormwater runoff. The NPDES
Permit includes a Storm Water
Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP),
which outlines monitoring standards,
frequency and baseline modeling.

The Owner/applicant has submitted
monthly reports to the City and
SRWQCB. There are no off-site
elements outside the City limits for
this subdivision.

Yes

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

Central Valley RWQCB, to reduce water quality effects during construction. Detailed information about the SWPPP and BMPs are provided in Chapter 3A.9, “Hydrology and Water Quality.” Each project development shall result in no net change to peak flows into Alder Creek and associated tributaries, or to Buffalo Creek, Carson Creek, and Coyote Creek. The project applicant(s) shall establish a baseline of conditions for drainage on-site. The baseline-flow conditions shall be established for 2-, 5-, and 100-year storm events. These baseline conditions shall be used to develop monitoring standards for the stormwater system on the SPA. The baseline conditions, monitoring standards, and a monitoring program shall be submitted to USACE and the City for their approval. Water quality and detention basins shall be designed and constructed to ensure that the performance standards, which are described in Chapter 3A.9, “Hydrology and Water Quality,” are met and shall be designed as off-stream detention basins. Discharge sites into Alder Creek and associated tributaries, as well as tributaries to Carson Creek, Coyote Creek, and Buffalo Creek, shall be monitored to ensure that pre-project conditions are being met. Corrective measures shall be implemented as necessary. The mitigation measures will be satisfied when the monitoring standards are met for 5 consecutive years without undertaking corrective measures to meet the performance standard.

See FEIR/FEIS Appendix S showing that the detention basin in the northeast corner of the SPA has been moved off stream.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom’s jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase in consultation with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado County for the roadway connections, Sacramento County for the detention basin west of Prairie City Road, and Caltrans for the U.S. 50 interchange improvements) such that the performance standards described in Chapter 3A.9, “Hydrology and Water Quality,” are met. 106
-13
3A.3-1b
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Secure Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit and Implement All Permit Conditions; Ensure No Net Loss of Functions and Values of Wetlands, Other Waters of the U.S., and Waters of the State.

Before the approval of grading and improvement plans and before any groundbreaking activity associated with each distinct discretionary development entitlement, the project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application requiring fill of wetlands or other waters of the U.S. or waters of the state shall obtain all necessary permits under Sections 401 and 404 of the CWA or the state’s Porter-Cologne Act for the respective phase. For each respective discretionary development entitlement, all permits, regulatory approvals, and permit conditions for effects on wetland habitats shall be secured before implementation of any grading activities within 250 feet of waters of the U.S. or wetland habitats or lesser distance deemed sufficiently protective by a qualified biologist with approval from USFWS, including waters of the state, that potentially support Federally listed species. The project applicant(s) shall commit to replace, restore, or enhance on a “no net loss” basis (in accordance with USACE and the Central Valley RWQCB) the acreage of all wetlands and other waters of the U.S. that would be removed, lost, and/or degraded with implementation of project plans for that development increment. Wetland habitat shall be restored, enhanced, and/or replaced at an acreage and location and by methods agreeable to USACE, the Central Valley RWQCB, and the City, as appropriate, depending on agency jurisdiction, and as determined during the Section 401 and Section 404 permitting processes. As part of the Section 404 permitting process, a draft wetland mitigation and monitoring plan (MMP) shall be developed for the project on behalf of the project applicant(s). Before any ground-disturbing activities in an area that would adversely affect wetlands and Before the
approval of
grading or
improvement
plans or any
ground
disturbing
activities for
any project
development
phase
containing
wetland
features or other
waters of the
U.S. The MMP
must be
approved before
any impact on
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The City and its Environmental
Compliance Consultant (Helix) have
reviewed all MMRP conditions and
verified compliance with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance was verified prior
to commencement of grading and
construction in the Summer of 2020. The
compliance table is on file with the City
.

The Owner/applicant has received a
NPDES permit from the State Regional
Water Quality Control Board
(SRWQCB). The NDES Permit
requires the implementation of BMP’s,
monitoring and reporting for stormwater
runoff. The NPDES Permit includes a
Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWPPP), which outlines monitoring
standards, frequency and baseline
modeling. The Owner/applicant has
Yes

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

before engaging in mitigation activities associated with each discretionary development entitlement, the project applicant(s) shall submit the draft wetland MMP to USACE, the Central Valley RWQCB, Sacramento County, El Dorado County, and the City for review and approval of those portions of the plan over which they have jurisdiction. The MMP would have to be finalized prior to impacting any wetlands.

Once the final MMP is approved and implemented, mitigation monitoring shall continue for a minimum of 5 years from completion of mitigation, or human intervention (including recontouring and grading), or until the performance standards identified in the approved MMP have been met, whichever is longer.

As part of the MMP, the project applicant(s) shall prepare and submit plans for the creation of aquatic habitat in order to adequately offset and replace the aquatic functions and services that would be lost at the SPA, account for the temporal loss of habitat, and contain an adequate margin of safety to reflect anticipated success. Restoration of previously altered and degraded wetlands shall be a priority of the MMP for offsetting losses of aquatic functions on the SPA because it is typically easier to achieve functional success in restored wetlands than in those created from uplands. The MMP must demonstrate how the aquatic functions and values that would be lost through project implementation will be replaced.

The habitat MMP for jurisdictional wetland features shall be consistent with USACE’s and EPA’s April 10, 2008 Final Rule for Compensatory Mitigation for Losses of Aquatic Resources (33 CFR Parts 325 and 332 and 40 CFR Part 230) and USACE’s October 26, 2010 Memorandum Re: Minimum Level of Documentation Required for Permit Decisions. According to the Final Rule, mitigation banks should be given preference over other types of mitigation because a lot of the risk and uncertainty regarding mitigation success is alleviated by the fact that mitigation bank wetlands must be established and demonstrating functionality before credits can be sold. The use of mitigation credits also alleviates temporal losses of wetland function while compensatory wetlands are being established. Mitigation banks also tend to be on larger, more ecologically valuable parcels and are subjected to more rigorous scientific study and planning and implementation procedures than typical permittee-responsible mitigation sites (USACE and EPA, 2008). Permittee-responsible on-site mitigation areas can be exposed to long-term negative effects of surrounding development since they tend to be smaller and less buffered than mitigation banks. The Final Rule also establishes a preference for a “watershed approach” in selecting locations for compensatory mitigation project locations, that mitigation selection must be “appropriate and practicable” and that mitigation banks must address watershed needs based on criteria set forth in the Final Rule. The watershed approach accomplishes this objective by expanding the informational and analytic basis of mitigation project site selection decisions and ensuring that both authorized impacts and mitigation are considered on a watershed scale rather than only project by project. This requires a degree of flexibility so that district engineers can authorize mitigation projects that most effectively address the case-specific circumstances and needs of the watershed, while remaining practicable for the permittee. The SPA includes portions of the Alder Creek, Buffalo Creek, Coyote Creek, and Carson Creek Watersheds. The majority of the SPA is within the Alder Creek Watershed. Alder Creek and Buffalo Creek are part of the Lower American River Watershed.

Carson Creek and Coyote Creek are part of the Cosumnes River Watershed. Mitigation credits may be available within the Cosumnes Watershed, but not within the American River Watershed and not within the sub- watersheds of the SPA. Therefore, aquatic habitats may need to be restored or created on the SPA and adjacent off-site lands, preferably within the affected watersheds, in order to successfully replace lost functions at the appropriate watershed scale where loss of function would occur. It is not likely feasible to provide compensatory mitigation for all aquatic resource impacts on site. wetlands can
occur.

Mitigation shall
be implemented
on an ongoing
basis
throughout and
after
construction, as
required.
submitted monthly reports to the City
and SRWQCB.

The owner/applicant has recorded
Declarations of Covenants &
Restrictions (DCR’s) in compliance with
the requirements of the USACE permit.

The DCR’s are shown on the final map.

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

Therefore, a combination of on-site and off-site permittee-responsible mitigation and mitigation banking would likely be necessary to achieve the no-net-loss standard.

The SPA is located within the service areas of several approved mitigation banks (e.g., Bryte Ranch, Clay Station, Fitzgerald Ranch, and Twin City Mitigation Bank). The majority of compensatory mitigation for wetland impacts is proposed to be accomplished at an agency approved mitigation bank or banks authorized to sell credits to offset impacts in the SPA. The applicants’ biological consultant, ECORP, has identified availability of approximately 31 vernal pool credits and 228 seasonal wetland credits at mitigation banks whose service area includes the SPA. Additional credits may also be available from pending, but not yet approved, mitigation banks. However, availability is subject to change and, as noted above, a combination of mitigation bank credits and permittee-responsible on and off-site mitigation may be necessary to fully offset project impacts on wetlands and other waters of the U.S. If USACE determines that the use of mitigation bank credits is not sufficient mitigation to offset impacts within the SPA, the October 26, 2010 Memorandum Re: Minimum Level of Documentation Required for Permit Decisions requires USACE to specifically demonstrate why the use of bank credits is not acceptable to USACE in accordance with Section 33 CFR 332.3(a)(1).

Compensatory mitigation for losses of stream and intermittent drainage channels shall follow the Final Rule Guidelines, which specify that compensatory mitigation should be achieved through in-kind preservation, restoration, or enhancement within the same watershed, subject to practicability considerations. The wetland MMP shall address how to mitigate impacts on vernal pool, seasonal swale, seasonal wetland, seep, marsh, pond, and intermittent and perennial stream habitat, and shall describe specific method(s) to be implemented to avoid and/or mitigate any off-site project-related impacts. The wetland compensation section of the habitat MMP shall include the following:
 Compensatory mitigation sites and criteria for selecting these mitigation sites. In General, compensatory mitigation sites should meet the following criteria, based on the Final Rule;  located within the same watershed as the wetland or other waters that would be lost, as appropriate and practicable;
 located in the most likely position to successfully replace wetland functions lost on the impact site considering watershed-scale features such as aquatic habitat diversity, habitat connectivity, available water sources and hydrologic relationships, land use trends, ecological benefits, and compatibility with adjacent land uses, and the likelihood for success and sustainability;  A complete assessment of the existing biological resources in both the on-site preservation areas and off- site compensatory mitigation areas, including wetland functional assessment using the California Rapid Assessment Method (CRAM) (Collins et al. 2008), or other appropriate wetland assessment protocol as determined through consultation with USACE and the USFWS, to establish baseline conditions;  Specific creation and restoration plans for each mitigation site;  Use of CRAM to compare compensatory wetlands to the baseline CRAM scores from wetlands in the SPA. The compensatory wetland CRAM scores shall be compared against the highest quality wetland of each type from the SPA;

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

 CRAM scores, or other wetland assessment protocol scores, from the compensatory wetlands shall be compared against the highest quality wetland scores for each wetland type to document success of compensatory wetlands in replacing the functions of the affected wetlands to be replaced;  Monitoring protocol, including schedule and annual report requirements, and the following elements:
 ecological performance standards, based on the best available science, that can be assessed in a practicable manner (e.g., performance standards proposed by Barbour et al. 2007). Performance standards must be based on attributes that are objective and verifiable;  assessments conducted annually for 5 years after construction or restoration of compensatory wetlands to determine whether these areas are acquiring wetland functions and to plot the performance trajectory of preserved, restored, or created wetlands over time.
 assessments results for compensatory wetlands shall also be compared against scores for reference wetlands assessed in the same year;
 assessments analysis conducted annually for 5 years after any construction adjacent to wetlands preserved on the SPA to determine whether these areas are retaining functions and values. Assessments results for wetlands preserved on site shall also be compared against scores for reference wetlands assessed in the same year;
 analysis of assessments data, including assessment of potential stressors, to determine whether any remedial activities may be necessary;
 corrective measures if performance standards are not met;  monitoring of plant communities as performance criteria (annual measure of success, during monitoring period) and success criteria (indicative of achievement of mitigation habitat requirement at end of monitoring period) for hydrologic function have become established and the creation site “matures” over time;
 GIS analysis of compensatory wetlands to demonstrate actual acreage of functioning wetland habitat;  adaptive management measures to be applied if performance standards and acreage requirements are not being met;
 responsible parties for monitoring and preparing reports; and  responsible parties for receiving and reviewing reports and for verifying success or prescribing implementation or corrective actions.

A final operations and management plan (OMP) for all on- and off-site permittee-sponsored wetland preservation and mitigation areas shall be prepared and submitted to USACE and USFWS for review, comment and preliminary approval prior to the issuance of any permits under Section 404 of the CWA. The plan shall include detailed information on the habitats present within the preservation and mitigation areas, the long-term management and monitoring of these habitats, legal protection for the preservation and mitigation areas (e.g., conservation easement, declaration of restrictions), and funding mechanism

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

information (e.g., endowment). A final OMP for each discretionary development entitlement affecting wetlands must be approved prior to construction.

USACE has determined that the project will require an individual permit. In its final stage and once approved by USACE, the MMP for the project is expected to detail proposed wetland restoration, enhancement, and/or replacement activities that would ensure no net loss of aquatic functions in the project vicinity. Approval and implementation of the wetland MMP shall aim to fully mitigate all unavoidable impacts on jurisdictional waters of the U.S., including jurisdictional wetlands. In addition to USACE approval, approval by the City, Sacramento County, El Dorado County, and the Central Valley RWQCB, as appropriate depending on agency jurisdiction, and as determined during the Section 401 and Section 404 permitting processes, will also be required. Approvals from Sacramento County and El Dorado County shall be required for impacts resulting from off-site project elements occurring in these counties, such as the off-site detention basin in Sacramento County and the roadway connections into El Dorado County. To satisfy the requirements of the City and the Central Valley RWQCB, mitigation of impacts on the nonjurisdictional wetlands beyond the jurisdiction of USACE shall be included in the same MMP. All mitigation requirements determined through this process shall be implemented before grading plans are approved. The MMP shall be submitted to USACE and approved prior to the issuance of any permits under Section 404 of the CWA. Water quality certification pursuant to Section 401 of the CWA will be required before issuance of a Section 404 permit.

Before construction in any areas containing wetland features, the project applicant(s) shall obtain water quality certification for the project. Any measures required as part of the issuance of water quality certification shall be implemented.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom’s jurisdictional boundaries must be developed by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase in consultation with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., Caltrans, El Dorado and/or Sacramento Counties). 106
-14
3A.3-2a
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Avoid Direct Loss of Swainson’s Hawk and Other Raptor Nests. To mitigate impacts on Swainson’s hawk and other raptors (including burrowing owl), the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct preconstruction surveys and to identify active nests on and within 0.5 mile of the SPA and active burrows on the SPA. The surveys shall be conducted before the approval of grading and/or improvement plans (as applicable) and no less than 14 days and no more than 30 days before the beginning of construction for all project phases. To the extent feasible, guidelines provided in Recommended Timing and Methodology for Swainson’s Hawk Nesting Surveys in the Central Valley (Swainson’s Hawk Technical Advisory Committee 2000) shall be followed for surveys for Swainson’s hawk. If no nests are found, no further mitigation is required.

If active nests are found, impacts on nesting Swainson’s hawks and other raptors shall be avoided by establishing appropriate buffers around the nests. No project activity shall commence within the buffer area until the young have fledged, the nest is no longer active, or until a qualified biologist has determined in consultation with DFG that reducing the buffer would not result in nest abandonment. DFG guidelines recommend implementation of 0.25- or 0.5-mile-wide buffers, but the size of the buffer may be adjusted if a qualified biologist and the City, in consultation with DFG, determine that such an adjustment would not be likely to adversely affect the nest. Monitoring of the nest by a qualified biologist during and after construction activities will be required if the activity has potential to adversely affect the nest.

Before the
approval of
grading and
improvement
plans, before
any ground
disturbing
activities, and
during project
construction as
applicable for
all project
phases.

California
Department of
Fish and Game
and City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department.

The City and its Environmental
Compliance Consultant (Helix) have
reviewed all MMRP conditions and
verified compliance with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance was verified prior
to commencement of grading and
construction in the Summer of 2020. The
compliance table is on file with the City
.

Yes

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

If active burrows are found, a mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval before any ground-disturbing activities.

The City shall consult with DFG. The mitigation plan may consist of installation of one-way doors on all burrows to allow owls to exit, but not reenter, and construction of artificial burrows within the project vicinity, as needed; however, burrow owl exclusions may only be used if a qualified biologist verifies that the burrow does not contain eggs or dependent young. If active burrows contain eggs and/or young, no construction shall occur within 50 feet of the burrow until young have fledged. Once it is confirmed that there are no owls inside burrows, these burrows may be collapsed.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom’s jurisdictional boundaries must be developed by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase in consultation with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or Sacramento Counties, or Caltrans), such that the performance criteria set forth in DFG’s guidelines are determined to be met. 106
-15
3A.3-2b
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Mitigation Measure 3A.3-2b: Prepare and Implement a Swainson’s Hawk Mitigation Plan.

To mitigate for the loss of Swainson’s hawk foraging habitat, the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall prepare and implement a Swainson’s hawk mitigation plan including, but not limited to the requirements described below.

Before the approval of grading and improvement plans or before any ground-disturbing activities, whichever occurs first, the project applicant(s) shall preserve, to the satisfaction of the City or Sacramento County, as appropriate depending on agency jurisdiction, suitable Swainson’s hawk foraging habitat to ensure 1:1 mitigation of habitat value for Swainson’s hawk foraging habitat lost as a result of the project, as determined by the City, or Sacramento County, after consultation with DFG and a qualified biologist.

The 1:1 habitat value shall be based on Swainson’s hawk nesting distribution and an assessment of habitat quality, availability, and use within the City’s planning area, or Sacramento County jurisdiction. The mitigation ratio shall be consistent with the 1994 DFG Swainson’s Hawk Guidelines included in the Staff Report Regarding Mitigation for Impacts to Swainson’s Hawks (Buteo swainsoni) in the Central Valley of California, which call for the following mitigation ratios for loss of foraging habitat in these categories: 1:1 if within 1 mile of an active nest site, 0.75:1 if over 1 mile but less than 5 miles, and 0.5:1 if over 5 miles but less than 10 miles from an active nest site. Such mitigation shall be accomplished through credit purchase from an established mitigation bank approved to sell Swainson’s hawk foraging habitat credits to mitigate losses in the SPA, if available, or through the transfer of fee title or perpetual conservation easement. The mitigation land shall be located within the known foraging area and within Sacramento County. The City, or Sacramento County if outside City jurisdiction, after consultation with DFG, will determine the appropriateness of the mitigation land.

Before approval of such proposed mitigation, the City, or Sacramento County for the off-site detention basin, shall consult with DFG regarding the appropriateness of the mitigation. If mitigation is accomplished through conservation easement, then such an easement shall ensure the continued management of the land to maintain Swainson’s hawk foraging values, including but not limited to ongoing agricultural uses and the maintenance of all existing water rights associated with the land. The conservation easement shall be recordable and shall Before the
approval of
grading,
improvement,
or construction
plans and
before any
ground
disturbing
activity in any
project
development
phase that
would affect
Swainson’s
hawk foraging
habitat.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The City and its Environmental
Compliance Consultant (Helix) have
reviewed all MMRP conditions and
verified compliance with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance was verified prior
to commencement of grading and
construction in the Summer of 2020. The
compliance table is on file with the City
.

Yes

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

prohibit any activity that substantially impairs or diminishes the land’s capacity as suitable Swainson’s hawk habitat.

The project applicant(s) shall transfer said Swainson’s hawk mitigation land, through either conservation easement or fee title, to a third party, nonprofit conservation organization (Conservation Operator), with the City and DFG named as third-party beneficiaries. The Conservation Operator shall be a qualified conservation easement land manager that manages land as its primary function. Additionally, the Conservation Operator shall be a tax-exempt nonprofit conservation organization that meets the criteria of Civil Code Section 815.3(a) and shall be selected or approved by the City or County, after consultation with DFG. The City, or County, after consultation with DFG and the Conservation Operator, shall approve the content and form of the conservation easement. The City, or County, DFG, and the Conservation Operator shall each have the power to enforce the terms of the conservation easement. The Conservation Operator shall monitor the easement in perpetuity to assure compliance with the terms of the easement.

The project applicant(s), after consultation with the City, or County of jurisdiction, DFG, and the Conservation Operator, shall establish an endowment or some other financial mechanism that is sufficient to fund in perpetuity the operation, maintenance, management, and enforcement of the conservation easement.

If an endowment is used, either the endowment funds shall be submitted to the City for impacts on lands within the City’s jurisdiction or Sacramento County for the off-site detention basin to be distributed to an appropriate third-party nonprofit conservation agency, or they shall be submitted directly to the third-party nonprofit conservation agency in exchange for an agreement to manage and maintain the lands in perpetuity.

The Conservation Operator shall not sell, lease, or transfer any interest of any conservation easement or mitigation land it acquires without prior written approval of the City and DFG. Mitigation lands established or acquired for impacts incurred at the off-site detention basin shall require approval from Sacramento County prior to sale or transfer of mitigation lands or conservation easement.

If the Conservation Operator ceases to exist, the duty to hold, administer, manage, maintain, and enforce the interest shall be transferred to another entity acceptable to the City and DFG, or Sacramento County and DFG depending on jurisdiction of the affected habitat. The City Planning Department shall ensure that mitigation habitat established for impacts on habitat within the City’s planning area is properly established and is functioning as habitat by reviewing regular monitoring reports prepared by the Conservation Operator of the mitigation site(s). Monitoring of the mitigation site(s) shall continue for the first 10 years after establishment of the easement and shall be funded through the endowment, or other appropriate funding mechanism, established by the project applicant(s). Sacramento County shall review the monitoring reports for impacts on habitat at the off-site detention basin.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom’s jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., Sacramento County and Caltrans).
106
-16
3A.3-2c
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Avoid and Minimize Impacts to Tricolored Blackbird Nesting Colonies. To avoid and minimize impacts to tricolored blackbird, the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall conduct a preconstruction survey for any project activity that would occur during the tricolored blackbird’s nesting season (March 1–August 31). The preconstruction survey shall be conducted by a qualified biologist before any activity occurring Before the
approval of any
ground-
disturbing
activity within
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The City and its Environmental
Compliance Consultant (Helix) have
reviewed all MMRP conditions and
verified compliance with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance was verified prior
Yes

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

within 500 feet of suitable nesting habitat, including freshwater marsh and areas of riparian scrub vegetation.

The survey shall be conducted within 14 days before project activity begins.

If no tricolored blackbird colony is present, no further mitigation is required. If a colony is found, the qualified biologist shall establish a buffer around the nesting colony. No project activity shall commence within the buffer area until a qualified biologist confirms that the colony is no longer active. The size of the buffer shall be determined in consultation with DFG. Buffer size is anticipated to range from 100 to 500 feet, depending on the nature of the project activity, the extent of existing disturbance in the area, and other relevant circumstances.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom’s jurisdictional boundaries (i.e., U.S. 50 interchange improvements) must be developed by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase in consultation with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., Caltrans) and must be sufficient to achieve the performance criteria described above.
500 feet of
suitable nesting
habitat as
applicable for
all project
phases.
to commencement of grading and
construction in the Summer of 2020. The
compliance table is on file with the City.

106
-17
3A.3-2d
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Avoid and Minimize Impacts to Special-Status Bat Roosts. The project applicant of all project phases containing potential bat roosting habitat shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct surveys for roosting bats.

Surveys shall be conducted in the fall to determine if the mine shaft is used as a hibernaculum and in spring and/or summer to determine if it is used as a maternity or day roost. Surveys shall consist of evening emergence surveys to note the presence or absence of bats and could consist of visual surveys at the time of emergence. If evidence of bat use is observed, the number and species of bats using the roost shall be determined. Bat detectors may be used to supplement survey efforts. If no bat roosts are found, then no further study shall be required.

If roosts of pallid bat or Townsend’s big-eared bats are determined to be present and must be removed, the bats shall be excluded from the roosting site. A mitigation program addressing compensation, exclusion methods, and roost removal procedures shall be developed in consultation with DFG before implementation.

Exclusion methods may include use of one-way doors at roost entrances (bats may leave but not reenter), or sealing roost entrances when the site can be confirmed to contain no bats. Exclusion efforts may be restricted during periods of sensitive activity (e.g., during hibernation or while females in maternity colonies are nursing young). The loss of each roost (if any) will be replaced in consultation with DFG and may include construction and installation of bat boxes suitable to the bat species and colony size excluded from the original roosting site. Roost replacement will be implemented before bats are excluded from the original roost sites. Once the replacement roosts are constructed and it is confirmed that bats are not present in the original roost site, the mine shaft may be removed.

Before the
approval of any
ground-
disturbing
activity within
500 feet of
suitable nesting
habitat as
applicable for
all project
phases.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The City and its Environmental
Compliance Consultant (Helix) have
reviewed all MMRP conditions and
verified compliance with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance was verified prior
to commencement of grading and
construction in the Summer of 2020. The
compliance table is on file with the City
.

Yes
106
-18
3A.3-2g
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Secure Take Authorization for Federally Listed Vernal Pool Invertebrates and Implement All Permit Conditions. No project construction shall proceed in areas supporting potential habitat for Federally listed vernal pool invertebrates, or within adequate buffer areas (250 feet or lesser distance deemed sufficiently protective by a qualified biologist with approval from USFWS), until a biological opinion (BO) or Not Likely to Adversely Affect (NLAA) letter has been issued by USFWS and the project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development entitlements affecting such areas have abided by conditions in the BO (including conservation and minimization measures) intended to be completed before on-site construction.

Conservation and minimization measures shall include preparation of supporting documentation describing Before the
approval of any
grading or
improvement
plans, before
any ground
disturbing
activities within
250 feet of said
U.S. Army
Corps of
Engineers,
Sacramento
District; U.S.

Fish and
Wildlife
Service; and
City of Folsom
The City and its Environmental
Compliance Consultant (Helix) have
reviewed all MMRP conditions and
verified compliance with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance was verified prior
to commencement of grading and
construction in the Summer of 2020. The
compliance table is on file with the City
.

Yes

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

methods to protect existing vernal pools during and after project construction, a detailed monitoring plan, and reporting requirements.

As described under Mitigation Measure 3A.3-1a, an MMP shall be developed that describes details how loss of vernal pool and other wetland habitats shall be offset, including details on creation of habitat, account for the temporal loss of habitat, contain performance standards to ensure success, and outline remedial actions if performance standards are not met.

The project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application potentially affecting vernal pool habitat shall complete and implement a habitat MMP that will result in no net loss of acreage, function, and value of affected vernal pool habitat. The final habitat MMP shall be consistent with guidance provided in Programmatic Formal Endangered Species Act Consultation on Issuance of 404 Permits for Projects with Relatively Small Effects on Listed Vernal Pool Crustaceans within the Jurisdiction of the Sacramento Field Office, California (USFWS 1996) or shall provide an alternative approach that is acceptable to the City, USACE, and USFWS and accomplishes no net loss of habitat acreage, function, and value.

The project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application “potentially affecting vernal pool habitat” shall ensure that there is sufficient upland habitat within the target areas for creation and restoration of vernal pools and vernal pool complexes to provide ecosystem health. This standard shall be accomplished by requiring the project applicant(s) for any discretionary development application affecting vernal pool or seasonal wetland habitat to identify the extent of indirectly affected vernal pool and seasonal wetland habitat, either by identifying all such habitat within 250 feet of project construction activities or by providing an alternative technical evaluation. If a lesser distance is pursued, this distance shall be approved by USFWS. The project applicant(s) shall preserve acreage of vernal pool habitat for each wetted acre of any indirectly affected vernal pool habitat at a ratio approved by USFWS at the conclusion of the Section 7 consultation. This mitigation shall occur before the approval of any grading or improvement plans for any project phase that would allow work within 250 feet of such habitat or lesser distance deemed sufficiently protective by a qualified biologist with approval from USFWS, and before any ground disturbing activity within 250 feet of the habitat or lesser distance deemed sufficiently protective by a qualified biologist with approval from USFWS. The project applicant(s) will not be required to complete this mitigation measure for direct or indirect impacts that have already been mitigated to the satisfaction of USFWS through another BO or mitigation plan (i.e., if impacts on specific habitat acreage are mitigated by one project phase or element, the project applicant(s) will not be required to mitigate for it again in another phase of the project).

A standard set of BMPs shall be applied to construction occurring in areas within 250 feet of off-site vernal pool habitat, or within any lesser distance deemed adequate by a qualified biologist (with approval from USFWS) to constitute a sufficient buffer from such habitat. Refer to Section 3A.9, “Hydrology and Water Quality - Land” for the details of BMPs to be implemented.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom’s jurisdictional boundaries must be developed by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase in consultation with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or Sacramento Counties, or Caltrans). habitat or lesser
distance
deemed
sufficiently
protective by a
qualified
biologist with
approval from
USFWS, and on
an ongoing
basis
throughout
construction as
applicable for
all project
phases as
required by the
mitigation plan,
BO, and/or
BMPs.

Community
Development
Department
106
-19
3A.3-4a
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Mitigation Measure 3A.3-4a: Secure and Implement Section 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement.

The project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application shall obtain a Section 1602 streambed alteration agreement from DFG for all construction activities that would occur in the bed and bank Before the
approval of
grading or
California
Department of
Fish and Game
The City and its Environmental
Compliance Consultant (Helix) have
reviewed all MMRP conditions and
Yes

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

of Alder Creek and other drainage channels and ponds on the SPA. As a condition of issuance of the streambed alteration agreement, the project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application affecting riparian habitat shall hire a qualified restoration ecologist to prepare a riparian habitat MMP. The draft MMP shall describe specific method(s) to be implemented to avoid and/or compensate for impacts on the stream channel of Alder Creek and other drainage channels within DFG jurisdiction, and the bed and banks of the on-site ponds. Mitigation measures may include establishment or restoration of riparian habitat within the project’s open space areas along preserved stream corridors, riparian habitat restoration off- site, or preservation and enhancement of existing riparian habitat either on or off the SPA. The compensation habitat shall be similar in composition and structure to the habitat to be removed and shall be at ratios adequate to offset the loss of riparian habitat functions and services at the SPA. The riparian habitat compensation section of the habitat MMP shall include the following:
 compensatory mitigation sites and criteria for selecting these mitigation sites;  complete assessment of the existing biological resources in both the on-site and off-site preservation and restoration areas;
 site-specific management procedures to benefit establishment and maintenance of native riparian plant species, including black willow, arroyo willow, white alder, and Fremont cottonwood;  a planting and irrigation program if needed for establishment of native riparian trees and shrubs at strategic locations within each mitigation site (planting and irrigation may not be necessary if preservation of functioning riparian habitat is chosen as mitigation or if restoration can be accomplished without irrigation or planting);
 in kind reference habitats for comparison with compensatory riparian habitats (using performance and success criteria) to document success;
 monitoring protocol, including schedule and annual report requirements (compensatory riparian habitats shall be monitored for a minimum period of five years);  ecological performance standards, based on the best available science and including specifications for native riparian plant densities, species composition, amount of dead woody vegetation gaps and bare ground, and survivorship; at a minimum, compensatory mitigation planting sites must achieve 80% survival of planted riparian trees and shrubs by the end of the five-year maintenance and monitoring period or dead and dying trees shall be replaced and monitoring continued until 80% survivorship is achieved;
 corrective measures if performance standards are not met;  responsible parties for monitoring and preparing reports; and  responsible parties for receiving and reviewing reports and for verifying success or prescribing implementation or corrective actions.

Any conditions of issuance of the Streambed Alteration Agreement shall be implemented as part of project construction activities that adversely affect the bed and bank and riparian habitat associated with Alder Creek and other drainage channels and ponds that are within the project area that is subject to DFG jurisdiction. The improvement
plans or any
construction
activities
(including
clearing and
grubbing) that
affect the bed
and bank or
riparian and
freshwater
marsh habitat
associated with
Alder Creek
and other on-
site or off-site
drainage
channels and
ponds.
and City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
verified compliance with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance was verified prior
to commencement of grading and
construction in the Summer of 2020. The
compliance table is on file with the City
.

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

agreement shall be executed by the project applicant(s) and DFG before the approval of any grading or improvement plans or any construction activities in any project phase that could potentially affect the bed and bank of Alder Creek and other on-site or off-site drainage channels under DFG jurisdiction and their associated freshwater marsh and riparian habitat.

Mitigation for the U.S. 50 interchange improvements must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase with the Caltrans.
106
-20
3A.3-4b
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Conduct Surveys to Identify and Map Valley Needlegrass Grassland; Implement Avoidance and Minimization Measures or Compensatory Mitigation. The project applicant(s) of all project phases shall retain a qualified botanist to conduct preconstruction surveys to determine if valley needlegrass grassland is present on the SPA. This could be done concurrently with any special-status plant surveys conducted on site as special-status plant surveys are floristic in nature, i.e. require that all species encountered be identified, and require preparation of a plant community map. If valley needlegrass grassland is not found on the SPA, the botanist shall document the findings in a letter report to the City of Folsom, and no further mitigation shall be required. Valley needlegrass grassland was not found in any of the off-site project elements.

If valley needlegrass grassland is found on the SPA, the location and extent of the community shall be mapped and the acreage of this community type, if any, that would be removed by project implementation shall be calculated. The project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application affecting valley needlegrass grassland shall consult with DFG and the City of Folsom to determine appropriate mitigation for removal of valley needlegrass grassland resulting from project implementation.

Mitigation measures shall include one or more of the following components sufficient to achieve no net loss of valley needlegrass grassland acreage: establishment of valley needlegrass grassland within project’s open space areas currently characterized by annual grassland, establishment of valley needlegrass grassland off- site, or preservation and enhancement of existing valley needlegrass grassland either on or off the SPA. The applicant(s) shall compensate for any loss of valley needlegrass grassland resulting from project implementation at a minimum 1:1 replacement ratio.

Before approval
of grading or
improvement
plans or any
ground
disturbing
activities,
including
grubbing or
clearing, for
any project
phase.

California
Department of
Fish and Game,
and City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The City and its Environmental
Compliance Consultant (Helix) have
reviewed all MMRP conditions and
verified compliance with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance was verified prior
to commencement of grading and
construction in the Summer of 2020. The
compliance table is on file with the City
.

Yes
106
-21
3A.3-5 (FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Conduct Tree Survey, Prepare and Implement an Oak Woodland Mitigation Plan, Replace Native Oak Trees Removed, and Implement Measures to Avoid and Minimize Indirect Impacts on Oak Trees Retained On Site. The project applicant(s) shall prepare an oak woodland mitigation and monitoring plan.

The project applicant(s) of all on- and off-site project phases containing oak woodland habitat or individual trees shall adhere to the requirements described below, which are consistent with those outlined in California Public Resources Code 21083.4. Pursuant to Sacramento County General Plan policy, the acreage of oak woodland habitat for determining impacts and mitigation requirements was calculated as the oak tree canopy area within stands of oak trees having greater than 10% cover plus a 30-foot-radius buffer measured from the outer edge of the tree canopy. Oak trees located in areas greater than 30 feet from stands meeting the greater than 10% tree canopy cover criterion were considered isolated trees and not part of the blue oak woodland community. Mitigation for impacts on isolated oak trees is discussed separately below.  Preserve approximately 399 acres of existing oak woodland habitat in the SPA (this acreage is based on the extent of oak woodland habitat as determined from aerial photograph interpretation; however, following completion of ground verification by a qualified arborist, the actual amount of oak woodland Before approval
of grading or
improvement
plans or any
ground
disturbing
activities,
including
grubbing or
clearing, for
any project
phase
containing
protected trees
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The owner/applicant obtained a Tree
Permit from the Community
Development Department for the
removal of protected oak trees that
were impacted by the grading and
construction of Phase 3 of the Toll
Brothers at Folsom Ranch project.

The Tree Permit was approved prior
to commencement of grading and
construction in the Summer of 2020.

The owner/applicant paid in-lieu
fees for the removal of some trees,
the City approved a Tree
Yes

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

present within impact areas could be slightly greater or lesser than the amount calculated from aerial photograph and, therefore, the amount preserved could also be slightly greater or lesser than 399 acres).  Create 243 acres of oak woodland habitat in the SPA by planting a combination of blue oak acorns, seedlings, and trees in the following SPA locations:
 Non-wooded areas that are adjacent to or contiguous with the existing oak woodland habitat.  Preserve and passive open space zones throughout the SPA.  Open space areas that are adjacent to existing oak woodlands that will be impacted by project grading (i.e. catch slopes).
 Other practical locations within the SPA in or adjacent to open space.  Oak Woodlands Mitigation Planting Criteria
The following oak woodland mitigation planting criteria shall be used to create oak woodland habitat:
 A minimum of 55 planting sites per acre (with a total of 70 units, as defined below) will mitigate for one acre of oak woodland impacts. A combination of acorns, seedlings, and various sizes of container trees (#1 container, #5 container, #15 container) or transplanted trees shall be incorporated into the planting design. Mitigation acreage that is planted solely with larger oak trees (no acorns) shall have a minimum of 35 planting sites per acre. The units are defined as follows:
 One established acorn equals one unit (acorns will be over planted to maximize potential germination).  One oak seedling equals one unit.
 One #1 container oak tree equals two units.
 One #5 container oak tree equals three units.
 One #15 container oak tree equals four units.
 One 24-inch boxed oak tree equals six units.
 One transplanted oak tree equals four units per trunk diameter inch (dbh).  Native non oak species characteristic of oak woodlands shall be included in the mitigation planting plan to augment overall habitat values. Each non oak tree species shall represent unit values described above for oak trees, but non oak species shall comprise no more than 10% of the mitigation plantings.  Preserve and protect existing off-site oak woodland habitat. Existing, unprotected oak woodland habitat within Sacramento and El Dorado Counties may be secured and placed under conservation easement in lieu of onsite mitigation measures if necessary. The off-site locations would be managed as oak woodland habitat in perpetuity.
 Create oak woodlands off site. Plant a combination of blue oak acorns, seedlings, and trees at off-site location(s), if needed to achieve the creation goal of 243 acres of new blue oak woodland habitat. This measure would only be needed if 243 acres of blue oak woodland could not be created in the SPA. Off- site creation shall follow the same guidelines as outlined in the Mitigation Planting Criteria for onsite creation. Off-site tree planting shall occur at sites within Sacramento County that should naturally or oak
woodland.

Replacement Plan for another
portion of the tree that were removed
and preserved existing oak trees in
El Dorado County for the remaining
mitigation for the total number of
protected trees in accordance with
this condition.

The Conservation Easements within the
Phase 3 portion of the subdivision were
fenced off around their boundaries in
advance of the commencement of
grading and construction and the City
verified compliance by inspecting the
fence in advance of grading.

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

support blue oak woodland and shall be used to restore former blue oak woodland habitat that has been degraded or removed through human activities. Restoration shall be designed to result in species composition and densities similar to those in the SPA prior to project development. Planted areas shall be placed under conservation easement and managed as oak woodland habitat in perpetuity.  The oak woodland mitigation plan prepared by the project applicant(s) shall include a maintenance and monitoring program for any replacement trees. The program shall include monitoring and reporting requirements, schedule, and success criteria. Replacement oak trees shall be maintained and monitored for a minimum of eight years from the date of planting and irrigation shall be provided to planted trees for the first five years after planting. Any replacement trees that die during the monitoring period shall be replaced in sufficient numbers to achieve 80% survival rate for planted trees by the end of the eight- year maintenance and monitoring period. Dead and dying trees shall be replaced and monitoring continued until 80% survivorship is achieved. Security acceptable to the City and sufficient to cover maintenance and monitoring costs for eight years shall be provided to the City Planning Department.

The security will be forfeited if the project applicant or designated responsible party fails to provide maintenance and monitoring and meet the success criteria.

Isolated Oak Tree Mitigation
The project applicant(s) of all on-site project phases containing oak woodland habitat or isolated trees and the off-site Prairie City Road and Oak Avenue interchange improvements to U.S. 50; Rowberry Drive Overcrossing; and the underground sewer force main shall develop a map depicting the tree canopy of all oak trees in the survey area and identifying the acreage of tree canopy that would be preserved and the acreage that would be removed. A tree permit for removal of isolated oak trees (those not located within the delineated boundary of oak woodland habitat) shall be obtained from the City Planning Director. As a condition of the tree removal permit, project applicant(s) shall be required to develop a Planting and Maintenance Agreement. The City’s Tree Preservation Code requires compensatory mitigation and the City and the project applicants have developed a plan, as set forth Section 10 of the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan (attached to this EIR/EIS as Appendix N) specifically to avoid and minimize adverse effects on isolated oak trees from project development and to provide compensatory mitigation for removal of protected trees in the SPA. In addition to the language contained in the Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan, the following elements shall be included in a protected tree mitigation plan to be developed by the project applicants and agreed upon by the City:
 Project applicant(s) of projects containing isolated oak trees shall retain a certified arborist or registered professional forester to perform a determinate survey of tree species, size (dbh), condition, and location for all areas of the project site proposed for tree removal and encroachment of development. The condition of individual trees shall be assessed according to the American Society of Consulting Arborists rating system with the following added explanations:
 5 = Excellent; No problems – tree has no structural problems, branches are properly spaced and tree characteristics are nearly perfect for the species.

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

 4 = Good; No apparent problems – tree is in good condition and no apparent problems from visual inspection. If potential structural or health problems are tended at this stage, future hazard can be reduced and more serious health problems can be averted.  3 = Fair; Minor problems – There are some minor structural or health problems that pose no immediate danger. When the recommended actions in an arborist report are completed correctly the defect(s) can be minimized or eliminated.
 2 = Poor; Major problems – the tree is in poor condition, but the condition could be improved with correct arboricultural work including, but not limited to: pruning, cabling, bracing, bolting, guying, spraying, mistletoe removal, vertical mulching, and fertilization. If the recommended actions are completed correctly, hazard can be reduced and the rating can be elevated to a 3. If no action is taken the tree is considered a liability and should be removed.  1 = Hazardous or non correctable condition – the tree is in extremely poor condition and in non- reversible decline. This rating is assigned to a tree that has structural and/or health problems that no amount of tree care work or effort can change. The issues may or may not be considered a dangerous situation. The tree may also be infested with a disease or pest(s) that is non-controllable at this time and is causing an unacceptable risk of spreading the disease or pests(s) to other trees.  0 = Dead – the tree has no significant signs of life (dead or very close to being dead).

Isolated Oak Tree Mitigation Planting Criteria
 The determination for whether an isolated tree shall be preserved, removed without compensation, or removed with compensatory mitigation shall be based on the condition and size of the tree as follows:
 Trees rated 0 or 1 may be removed with no mitigation.  Trees rated 2 may be removed at 50% of the normal Folsom Municipal Code mitigation.  Trees rated 3, 4, and/or 5 may be removed at the normal Folsom Municipal Code mitigation.  Native isolated oaks measuring 24 inches or greater dbh for a single trunk or 40 inches or more for a multi-trunked tree and rated a 3 to 5 shall be retained, unless retaining wall(s) higher than 4 feet tall (from bottom of footing to the top of the wall) would be required to protect the tree(s) from mass grading of the SPA properties.
 Native oaks measuring between 12 and 24 inches dbh and rated a 4 or 5 shall not be removed or mitigated unless wall(s) higher than 4 feet tall (from bottom of footing to the top of the wall) would be required to protect the tree(s) from mass grading of the SPA properties. Trees in this size class but rated 2 or 3 shall not be removed unless unreasonable costs to save the tree(s) (greater than the cost of implementing the isolated oak tree mitigation planting criteria described here) would result.  Native oaks measuring 5 inches or greater dbh but less than 12 inches dbh shall not be removed unless unreasonable costs to save the tree(s) (greater than the cost of implementing the isolated oak tree mitigation planting criteria described here) would result.

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

 Native oak trees measuring 1 inch or greater dbh but less than 5 inches dbh may be preserved to receive a Small Tree Preservation Credit (STPC). Any tree that is to be considered for preservation credit shall be evaluated, included in the arborist report, and shall have been found to be rated a 3, 4, or a 5. Credits shall only be accepted if the tree protection zone (TPZ) (i.e., the outer edge of the tree canopy drip line) is protected with fencing in the exact manner that 5 inches dbh and greater trees are protected on a construction site, and the spacing is equal to the proper tree spacing dictated by the Folsom Master Tree List. STPC shall not count if they the tree is in a poor growing space due to its position within the TPZ of another protected tree to be preserved. The City shall accept the preservation of native oak trees in this size class as credit towards the total removed inches based on the following STPC criteria:
 Folsom Municipal Code requires one of the following be planted as compensation for each diameter inch of protected tree removed:
 half of a 24-inch box tree;
 one #15 container tree;
 two #5 container trees; or
 $150 in-lieu payment or other fee set by City Council Resolution.  The Planting and Maintenance Agreement shall include a planting plan, planting and irrigation design details, and a weaning schedule for the establishment period. The plan shall include a 5-year establishment period for trees and 8 years for planted acorns with an annual monitoring report that includes corrections needed with proposed work plan, and notice of compliance within 90-days of annual monitoring report. Security in an form acceptable to the City and sufficient to cover maintenance and monitoring costs for eight years shall be provided to the City Planning Department. The security will be forfeited if the project applicant or designated responsible party fails to fulfill the Planting and Maintenance Agreement.
 To avoid and minimize indirect impacts on protected trees to remain on the SPA, the project applicant(s) of all affected project phases shall install high visibility fencing outside the outer edge of the drip lines of all trees to be retained on the SPA during project construction. The fencing may be installed around groups or stands of trees or whole wooded areas bust must be installed so that the drip lines of all trees are protected. Grading, trenching, equipment or materials storage, parking, paving, irrigation, and landscaping shall be prohibited within the fenced areas (i.e. drip lines of protected trees). If the activities listed cannot be avoided within the drip line of a particular tree, that tree shall be counted as an affected tree and compensatory mitigation shall be provided, or the tree in question shall be monitored for a period of five years and replaced only if the tree appears to be dead or dying within five years of project implementation.

Through a combination of the mitigation options presented above along with the proposed on-site preservation of blue oak woodland habitat in the open space areas, the project applicant(s) can satisfy the mitigation requirements for removal of trees protected under the Folsom Municipal Code while also

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

mitigating the impacts on oak woodland habitat, as determined through consultation with the Sacramento County Planning Department (for County off-site impacts only) and/or the City of Folsom.

Mitigation for the U.S. 50 interchange improvements must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase with Caltrans.
106
-22
WS-1
(Addendum)
Conduct Environmental Awareness Training for Construction Employees.

Prior to beginning construction activities, the Project Applicant shall employ a qualified biologist to develop and conduct environmental awareness training for construction employees. The training shall describe the importance of onsite biological resources, including special-status wildlife habitats; potential nests of special- status birds; and roosting habitat for special-status bats. The biologist shall also explain the importance of other responsibilities related to the protection of wildlife during construction such as inspecting open trenches and looking under vehicles and machinery prior to moving them to ensure there are no lizards, snakes, small mammals, or other wildlife that could become trapped, injured, or killed in construction areas or under equipment.

The environmental awareness program shall be provided to all construction personnel to brief them on the life history of special-status species in or adjacent to the project area, the need to avoid impacts on sensitive biological resources, any terms and conditions required by State and federal agencies, and the penalties for not complying with biological mitigation requirements. If new construction personnel are added to the project, the contractor’s superintendent shall ensure that the personnel receive the mandatory training before starting work. An environmental awareness handout that describes and illustrates sensitive resources to be avoided during project construction and identifies all relevant permit conditions shall be provided to each person.

Before approval
of grading or
improvement
plans or any
ground
disturbing
activities,
including
grubbing or
clearing, for
any project
phase.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The City and its Environmental
Compliance Consultant (Helix) have
reviewed all MMRP conditions and
verified compliance with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance was verified prior
to commencement of grading and
construction in the Summer of 2020. The
compliance table is on file with the City
.

Yes
106
-23
WS-2
(Addendum)
Conduct Preconstruction Western Spadefoot Survey.

The Project Applicant(s) shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct a preconstruction western spadefoot survey within 48 hours of the initiation of construction activity within suitable tadpole habitat (e.g., vernal pools, seasonal wetlands, and drainages with standing water) for western spadefoot. If no western spadefoot individuals are found during the preconstruction survey, the biologist shall document the findings in a letter report to CDFW and the City, and no further mitigation shall be required. If western spadefoot individuals are found, the qualified biologist shall consult with CDFW to determine appropriate avoidance measures.

Before approval
of grading or
improvement
plans or any
ground
disturbing
activities,
including
grubbing or
clearing, within
suitable tadpole
habitat.

California
Department of
Fish and Game,
and City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The City and its Environmental
Compliance Consultant (Helix) have
reviewed all MMRP conditions and
verified compliance with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance was verified prior
to commencement of grading and
construction in the Summer of 2020. The
compliance table is on file with the City
.

Yes
106
-24
NWPT-1
(Addendum)
Conduct Preconstruction Northwestern Pond Turtle Survey.

The Project Applicant(s) shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct a preconstruction northwestern pond turtle survey within 48 hours of the initiation of construction activity within suitable habitat for northwestern pond turtle. If no northwestern pond turtles are found during the preconstruction survey, the biologist shall document the findings in a letter report to CDFW and the City, and no further mitigation shall be required. If Before approval
of grading or
improvement
plans or any
ground
disturbing
activities,
California
Department of
Fish and Game,
and City of
Folsom
Community
The City and its Environmental
Compliance Consultant (Helix) have
reviewed all MMRP conditions and
verified compliance with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance was verified prior
to commencement of grading and
Yes

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

northwestern pond turtles are found, the qualified biologist shall capture and relocate the turtles to a suitable preserved location in the vicinity of the project.
including
grubbing or
clearing, within
suitable
northwestern
pond turtle
habitat.

Development
Department
construction in the Summer of 2020. The
compliance table is on file with the City.

106
-25
NB-1
(Addendum)
Preconstruction Nesting Bird Survey.

The Project Applicant shall conduct a preconstruction nesting bird survey of all areas associated with construction activities on the project site within 14 days prior to commencement of construction during the nesting season (1 February through 31 August).

If active nests are found, a no-disturbance buffer around the nest shall be established. The buffer distance shall be established by a qualified biologist in consultation with CDFW. The buffer shall be maintained until the fledglings are capable of flight and become independent of the nest, to be determined by a qualified biologist. Once the young are independent of the nest, no further measures are necessary. Pre-construction nesting surveys are not required for construction activity outside of the nesting season.

Before approval
of grading or
improvement
plans or any
ground
disturbing
activities,
including
grubbing or
clearing, for
any project
phase.

California
Department of
Fish and Game,
and City of
Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The City and its Environmental
Compliance Consultant (Helix) have
reviewed all MMRP conditions and
verified compliance with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance was verified prior
to commencement of grading and
construction in the Summer of 2020. The
compliance table is on file with the City
.

Yes
Cultural and Tribal Cultural Resources
106
-26
3A.5-1a
(Addendum)
Comply with the Programmatic Agreement.

The PA for the project is incorporated by reference. The PA provides a management framework for identifying historic properties, determining adverse effects, and resolving those adverse effects as required under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. This document is incorporated by reference. The PA is available for public inspection and review at the California Office of Historic Preservation 1725 23rd Street Sacramento, CA 95816.

During all
construction
phases
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department;
U.S. Army
Corp of
Engineers;
On June 10, 2019, the US Army Corps
of Engineers, in consultation with the
City, SHPO, the tribes and consulting
parties determined that the entire Toll
Brothers at Folsom Ranch Regency
project has satisfied its pre-construction
compliance requirements for cultural
resources and may proceed with
construction. All required compliance
letters are on file with the Community
Development Department.

Yes
106
-27
3A.5-1b
(Addendum)
Perform an Inventory and Evaluation of Cultural Resources for the California Register of Historic Places, Minimize or Avoid Damage or Destruction, and Perform Treatment Where Damage or Destruction Cannot be Avoided.

These steps may be combined with deliverables and management steps performed for Section 106 provided that management documents prepared for the PA also clearly reference the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) listing criteria and significance thresholds that apply under CEQA. Prior to ground disturbing work for each individual development phase or off-site element, the applicable oversight agency (City of Folsom, El Dorado County, Sacramento County, or Caltrans), or the project applicant(s) of all project phases, with applicable oversight agency, shall perform the following actions:

Before approval
of grading or
improvement
plans or any
ground
disturbing
activities,
including
grubbing or
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
On June 10, 2019, the US Army Corps
of Engineers, in consultation with the
City, SHPO, the tribes and consulting
parties determined that the entire Toll
Brothers at Folsom Ranch Regency
project has satisfied its pre-construction
compliance requirements for cultural
resources and may proceed with
construction. All required compliance
Yes

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

 The project applicant shall retain the services of a qualified archaeologist to perform an inventory of cultural resources within each individual development phase or off-site element subject to approval under CEQA. Identified resources shall be evaluated for listing on the CRHR. The inventory report shall also identify locations that are sensitive for undiscovered cultural resources based upon the location of known resources, geomorphology, and topography. The inventory report shall specify the location of monitoring of ground-disturbing work in these areas by a qualified archaeologist and monitoring in the vicinity of identified resources that may be damaged by construction, if appropriate.  The identification of any sensitive locations subject to monitoring during construction of each individual development phase shall be performed in concert with monitoring activities performed under the PA to minimize the potential for conflicting requirements.
 For each resource that is determined eligible for the CRHR, the applicable agency or the project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development (under the agency’s direction) shall obtain the services of a qualified archaeologist who shall determine if implementation of the individual project development would result in damage or destruction of “significant” (under CEQA) cultural resources.

These findings shall be reviewed by the applicable agency for consistency with the significance thresholds and treatment measures provided in this EIR/EIS.  Where possible, the project shall be configured or redesigned to avoid impacts on eligible or listed resources. Alternatively, these resources may be preserved in place if possible, as suggested under California Public Resources Code Section 21083.2. Avoidance of historic properties is required under certain circumstances under the Public Resource Code and 36 CFR Part 800.  Where impacts cannot be avoided, the applicable agency or the project applicant(s) of all project phases (under the applicable agency’s direction) shall prepare and implement treatment measures that are determined to be necessary by a qualified archaeologist. These measures may consist of data recovery excavations for resources that are eligible for listing because of the data they contain (which may contribute to research). Alternatively, for historical architectural, engineered, or landscape features, treatment measures may consist of a preparation of interpretive, narrative, or photographic documentation. These measures shall be reviewed by the applicable oversight agency for consistency with the significance thresholds and standards provided in this EIR/EIS.  To support the evaluation and treatment required under this Mitigation Measure, the archaeologist retained by either the applicable oversight agency or the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall prepare an appropriate prehistoric and historic context that identifies relevant prehistoric, ethnographic, and historic themes and research questions against which to determine the significance of identified resources and appropriate treatment.
 These steps and documents may be combined with the phasing of management and documents prepared pursuant to the FAPA to minimize the potential for inconsistency and duplicative management efforts. clearing, for
any project
phase.
letters are on file with the Community
Development Department.

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom’s jurisdictional boundaries shall be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or Sacramento Counties, or Caltrans). 106
-28
3A.5-2
(Addendum)
Conduct Construction Personnel Education, Conduct On-Site Monitoring If Required, Stop Work if Cultural Resources are Discovered, Assess the Significance of the Find, and Perform Treatment or Avoidance as Required.

To reduce potential impacts to previously undiscovered cultural resources, the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall do the following:
 Before the start of ground-disturbing activities, the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall retain a qualified archaeologist to conduct training for construction workers as necessary based upon the sensitivity of the project APE, to educate them about the possibility of encountering buried cultural resources and inform them of the proper procedures should cultural resources be encountered.  As a result of the work conducted for Mitigation Measures 3A.5-1a and 3A.5-1b, if the archaeologist determines that any portion of the SPA or the off-site elements should be monitored for potential discovery of as-yet-unknown cultural resources, the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall implement such monitoring in the locations specified by the archaeologist. USACE should review and approve any recommendations by archaeologists with respect to monitoring.  Should any cultural resources, such as structural features, unusual amounts of bone or shell, artifacts, or architectural remains be encountered during any construction activities, work shall be suspended in the vicinity of the find and the appropriate oversight agency(ies) (identified below) shall be notified immediately. The appropriate oversight agency(ies) shall retain a qualified archaeologist who shall conduct a field investigation of the specific site and shall assess the significance of the find by evaluating the resource for eligibility for listing on the CRHR and the NRHP. If the resource is eligible for listing on the CRHR or NRHP and it would be subject to disturbance or destruction, the actions required in Mitigation Measures 3A.5-1a and 3A.5-1b shall be implemented. The oversight agency shall be responsible for approval of recommended mitigation if it is determined to be feasible in light of the approved land uses and shall implement the approved mitigation before resuming construction activities at the archaeological site.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom’s jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or Sacramento Counties, or Caltrans).

The project applicant, in coordination with USACE, shall ensure that an archaeological sensitivity training program is developed and implemented during a pre-construction meeting for construction supervisors. The sensitivity training program shall provide information about notification procedures when potential archaeological material is discovered, procedures for coordination between construction personnel and monitoring personnel, and information about other treatment or issues that may arise if cultural resources (including human remains) are discovered during project construction. This protocol shall be communicated to all new construction personnel during orientation and on a poster that is placed in a visible location inside the Before approval
of grading or
improvement
plans or any
ground
disturbing
activities,
including
grubbing or
clearing, for
any project
phase.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department;
U.S. Army
Corp of
Engineers
On June 10, 2019, the US Army Corps
of Engineers, in consultation with the
City, SHPO, the tribes and consulting
parties determined that the entire Toll
Brothers at Folsom Ranch Regency
project has satisfied its pre-construction
compliance requirements for cultural
resources and may proceed with
construction. All required compliance
letters are on file with the Community
Development Department. Compliance
with this condition is monitored through
construction inspection.

Yes

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

construction job trailer. The phone number of the USACE cultural resources staff member shall also be included.

The on-site sensitivity training shall be carried out each time a new contractor will begin work in the APE and at the beginning of each construction season by each contractor.

If unanticipated discoveries of additional historic properties, defined in 36 CFR 800.16 (l), are made during the construction of the project, the USACE shall ensure that they will be protected by implementing the following measures:
 The Construction Manager, or archaeological monitor, if given the authority to halt construction activities, shall ensure that work in that area is immediately halted within a 100-foot radius of the unanticipated discovery until the find is examined by a person meeting the professional qualifications standards specified in Section 2.2 of Attachment G of the HPMP. The Construction Manager, or archaeological monitor, if present, shall notify the USACE within 24 hours of the discovery.  The USACE shall notify the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) within one working day of an unanticipated discovery and may initiate interim treatment measures in accordance with this HPTP.

Once the USACE makes a formal determination of eligibility for the resource, the USACE will notify the SHPO within 48 hours of the determination and afford the SHPO an opportunity to comment on appropriate treatment. The SHPO shall respond within 72 hours of the request to consult. Failure of the SHPO to respond within 72 hours shall not prohibit the USACE from implementing the treatment measures.

The project applicants shall be required to submit to the City proof of compliance in the form of a completed training roster and copy of training materials.
106
-29
3A.5-3
(Addendum)
Suspend Ground-Disturbing Activities if Human Remains are Encountered and Comply with California Health and Safety Code Procedures.

In accordance with the California Health and Safety Code, if human remains are uncovered during ground- disturbing activities, including those associated with off-site elements, the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall immediately halt all ground-disturbing activities in the area of the find and notify the Sacramento County Coroner and a professional archaeologist skilled in osteological analysis to determine the nature of the remains. The coroner is required to examine all discoveries of human remains within 48 hours of receiving notice of a discovery on private or public lands (California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5[b]). If the coroner determines that the remains are those of a Native American, he or she must contact the NAHC by phone within 24 hours of making that determination (California Health and Safety Code Section 7050[c]).

After the coroner’s findings are complete, the project applicant(s), an archaeologist, and the NAHC- designated Most Likely Descendant shall determine the ultimate treatment and disposition of the remains and take appropriate steps to ensure that additional human interments are not disturbed. The responsibilities for acting on notification of a discovery of Native American human remains are identified in Section 5097.9 of the California Public Resources Code.

During all
ground
disturbing
activities, for
any project
phase.

Sacramento
County
Coroner; Native
American
Heritage
Commission;
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
There have been no human remains
discovered during the course of grading
and construction in the project.

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

Upon the discovery of Native American remains, the procedures above regarding involvement of the applicable county coroner, notification of the NAHC, and identification of an Most Likely Descendant shall be followed. The project applicant(s) of all project phases shall ensure that the immediate vicinity (according to generally accepted cultural or archaeological standards and practices) is not damaged or disturbed by further development activity until consultation with the Most Likely Descendant has taken place. The Most Likely Descendant shall have 48 hours after being granted access to the site to inspect the site and make recommendations. A range of possible treatments for the remains may be discussed: nondestructive removal and analysis, preservation in place, relinquishment of the remains and associated items to the descendants, or other culturally appropriate treatment. As suggested by AB 2641 (Chapter 863, Statutes of 2006), the concerned parties may extend discussions beyond the initial 48 hours to allow for the discovery of additional remains. AB 2641(e) includes a list of site protection measures and states that the project applicant(s) shall comply with one or more of the following requirements:
 record the site with the NAHC or the appropriate Information Center,  use an open-space or conservation zoning designation or easement, or  record a reinternment document with the county.

The project applicant(s) or its authorized representative of all project phases shall rebury the Native American human remains and associated grave goods with appropriate dignity on the property in a location not subject to further subsurface disturbance if the NAHC is unable to identify an Most Likely Descendant or if the Most Likely Descendant fails to make a recommendation within 48 hours after being granted access to the site. The project applicant(s) or its authorized representative may also reinter the remains in a location not subject to further disturbance if it rejects the recommendation of the Most Likely Descendant and mediation by the NAHC fails to provide measures acceptable to the landowner. Ground disturbance in the zone of suspended activity shall not recommence without authorization from the archaeologist.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom’s jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or Sacramento Counties, or Caltrans).

The project applicants shall be required to submit to the City proof of compliance in the form of a completed training roster and copy of training materials.

Geology and Soils
106
-30
3A.7-1a
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)

Prepare Site-Specific Geotechnical Report per CBC Requirements and Implement Appropriate Recommendations. Before building permits are issued and construction activities begin any project development phase, the project applicant(s) of each project phase shall hire a licensed geotechnical engineer to prepare a final geotechnical subsurface investigation report for the on- and off-site facilities, which shall be submitted for review and approval to the appropriate City or county department (identified below). The final geotechnical engineering report shall address and make recommendations on the following:
 site preparation;
 soil bearing capacity;
 appropriate sources and types of fill;
Before issuance
of building
permits and
ground-
disturbing
activities.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The owner/applicant has provided
Geotechnical Report to the City. The
Geotechnical report for the subdivision is
on file with the City.

Yes

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

 potential need for soil amendments;
 road, pavement, and parking areas;
 structural foundations, including retaining-wall design;  grading practices;
 soil corrosion of concrete and steel;
 erosion/winterization;
 seismic ground shaking;
 liquefaction; and
 expansive/unstable soils.

In addition to the recommendations for the conditions listed above, the geotechnical investigation shall include subsurface testing of soil and groundwater conditions, and shall determine appropriate foundation designs that are consistent with the version of the CBC that is applicable at the time building and grading permits are applied for. All recommendations contained in the final geotechnical engineering report shall be implemented by the project applicant(s) of each project phase. Special recommendations contained in the geotechnical engineering report shall be noted on the grading plans and implemented as appropriate before construction begins. Design and construction of all new project development shall be in accordance with the CBC. The project applicant(s) shall provide for engineering inspection and certification that earthwork has been performed in conformity with recommendations contained in the geotechnical report. 106
-31
3A.7-1b
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Monitor Earthwork during Earthmoving Activities. All earthwork shall be monitored by a qualified geotechnical or soils engineer retained by the project applicant(s) of each project phase. The geotechnical or soils engineer shall provide oversight during all excavation, placement of fill, and disposal of materials removed from and deposited on both on- and off-site construction areas.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom’s jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or Sacramento Counties, or Caltrans).

Before issuance
of building
permits and
ground-
disturbing
activities.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Compliance with this condition has been
monitored through construction
inspection by the City.

Yes
106
-32
3A.7-3 (FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Prepare and Implement the Appropriate Grading and Erosion Control Plan. Before grading permits are issued, the project applicant(s) of each project phase that would be located within the City of Folsom shall retain a California Registered Civil Engineer to prepare a grading and erosion control plan. The grading and erosion control plan shall be submitted to the City Public Works Department before issuance of grading permits for all new development. The plan shall be consistent with the City’s Grading Ordinance, the City’s Hillside Development Guidelines, and the state’s NPDES permit, and shall include the site-specific grading associated with development for all project phases.

For the two off-site roadways into El Dorado Hills, the project applicant(s) of that phase shall retain a California Registered Civil Engineer to prepare a grading and erosion control plan. The grading and erosion control plan shall be submitted to the El Dorado County Public Works Department and the El Dorado Hills Community Service District before issuance of grading permits for roadway construction in El Dorado Hills.

The plan shall be consistent with El Dorado County’s Grading, Erosion, and Sediment Control Ordinance Before the start
of construction
activities.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Compliance with this condition has been
monitored through construction
inspection by the City.

Yes

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

and the state’s NPDES permit, and shall include the site-specific grading associated with roadway development.

For the off-site detention basin west of Prairie City Road, the project applicant(s) of that phase shall retain a California Registered Civil Engineer to prepare a grading and erosion control plan. The grading and erosion control plan shall be submitted to the Sacramento County Public Works Department before issuance of a grading permit. The plan shall be consistent with Sacramento County’s Grading, Erosion, and Sediment Control Ordinance and the state’s NPDES permit, and shall include the site-specific grading associated with construction of the detention basin.

The plans referenced above shall include the location, implementation schedule, and maintenance schedule of all erosion and sediment control measures, a description of measures designed to control dust and stabilize the construction-site road and entrance, and a description of the location and methods of storage and disposal of construction materials. Erosion and sediment control measures could include the use of detention basins, berms, swales, wattles, and silt fencing, and covering or watering of stockpiled soils to reduce wind erosion.

Stabilization on steep slopes could include construction of retaining walls and reseeding with vegetation after construction. Stabilization of construction entrances to minimize trackout (control dust) is commonly achieved by installing filter fabric and crushed rock to a depth of approximately 1 foot. The project applicant(s) shall ensure that the construction contractor is responsible for securing a source of transportation and deposition of excavated materials.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom’s jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or Sacramento Counties).

Implementation of Mitigation Measure 3A.9-1 (discussed in Section 3A.9, “Hydrology and Water Quality – Land”) would also help reduce erosion-related impacts.
106
-33
3A.7-5 (FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Divert Seasonal Water Flows Away from Building Foundations. The project applicant(s) of all project phases shall either install subdrains (which typically consist of perforated pipe and gravel, surrounded by nonwoven geotextile fabric), or take such other actions as recommended by the geotechnical or civil engineer for the project that would serve to divert seasonal flows caused by surface infiltration, water seepage, and perched water during the winter months away from building foundations.

Before and
during
earthmoving
activities.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The Community Development
Department has reviewed and all
improvement plans in the subdivision to
verify compliance with mitigation
measure.

Yes
106
-34
3A.7-10
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Conduct Construction Personnel Education, Stop Work if Paleontological Resources are Discovered, Assess the Significance of the Find, and Prepare and Implement a Recovery Plan as Required.

To minimize potential adverse impacts on previously unknown potentially unique, scientifically important paleontological resources, the project applicant(s) of all project phases where construction would occur in the Ione and Mehrten Formations shall do the following:
 Before the start of any earthmoving activities for any project phase in the Ione or Mehrten Formations, the project applicant(s) shall retain a qualified paleontologist or archaeologist to train all construction personnel involved with earthmoving activities, including the site superintendent, regarding the possibility of encountering fossils, the appearance and types of fossils likely to be seen during construction, and proper notification procedures should fossils be encountered.

During
earthmoving
activities in the
Ione and
Mehrten
Formations.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The City and its Environmental
Compliance Consultant (Helix) have
reviewed all MMRP conditions and
verified compliance with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance was verified prior
to commencement of grading and
construction in the Summer of 2020. The
compliance table is on file with the City
.

Yes

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

 If paleontological resources are discovered during earthmoving activities, the construction crew shall immediately cease work in the vicinity of the find and notify the appropriate lead agency (identified below). The project applicant(s) shall retain a qualified paleontologist to evaluate the resource and prepare a recovery plan in accordance with Society of Vertebrate Paleontology guidelines (1996). The recovery plan may include, but is not limited to, a field survey, construction monitoring, sampling and data recovery procedures, museum storage coordination for any specimen recovered, and a report of findings. Recommendations in the recovery plan that are determined by the lead agency to be necessary and feasible shall be implemented before construction activities can resume at the site where the paleontological resources were discovered.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom’s jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., Sacramento County).

Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Climate Change
106
-35
3A.4-1 (FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Implement Additional Measures to Control Construction-Generated GHG Emissions.

To further reduce construction-generated GHG emissions, the project applicant(s) any particular discretionary development application shall implement all feasible measures for reducing GHG emissions associated with construction that are recommended by SMAQMD at the time individual portions of the site undergo construction. Such measures may reduce GHG exhaust emissions from the use of on-site equipment, worker commute trips, and truck trips carrying materials and equipment to and from the SPA, as well as GHG emissions embodied in the materials selected for construction (e.g., concrete). Other measures may pertain to the materials used in construction. Prior to releasing each request for bid to contractors for the construction of each discretionary development entitlement, the project applicant(s) shall obtain the most current list of GHG reduction measures that are recommended by SMAQMD and stipulate that these measures be implemented in the respective request for bid as well as the subsequent construction contract with the selected primary contractor. The project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application may submit to the City and SMAQMD a report that substantiates why specific measures are considered infeasible for construction of that particular development phase and/or at that point in time. The report, including the substantiation for not implementing particular GHG reduction measures, shall be approved by the City, in consultation with SMAQMD prior to the release of a request for bid by the project applicant(s) for seeking a primary contractor to manage the construction of each development project. By requiring that the list of feasible measures be established prior to the selection of a primary contractor, this measure requires that the ability of a contractor to effectively implement the selected GHG reduction measures be inherent to the selection process.

SMAQMD’s recommended measures for reducing construction-related GHG emissions at the time of writing this EIR/EIS are listed below and the project applicant(s) shall, at a minimum, be required to implement the following:
 Improve fuel efficiency from construction equipment:
 reduce unnecessary idling (modify work practices, install auxiliary power for driver comfort); Before approval
of small-lot
final maps and
building
permits for all
discretionary
development
project,
including all
on- and off-site
elements and
implementation
throughout
project
construction.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The City and its Environmental
Compliance Consultant (Helix) have
reviewed all MMRP conditions and
verified compliance with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance was verified prior
to commencement of grading and
construction in the Summer of 2020. The
compliance table is on file with the City
.

Yes

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

 perform equipment maintenance (inspections, detect failures early, corrections);  train equipment operators in proper use of equipment;  use the proper size of equipment for the job; and
 use equipment with new technologies (repowered engines, electric drive trains).  Use alternative fuels for electricity generators and welders at construction sites such as propane or solar, or use electrical power.
 Use an ARB-approved low-carbon fuel, such as biodiesel or renewable diesel for construction equipment. (Emissions of oxides of nitrogen [NOX] emissions from the use of low carbon fuel must be reviewed and increases mitigated.) Additional information about low carbon fuels is available from ARB’s Low Carbon Fuel Standard Program (ARB 2009b).
 Encourage and provide carpools, shuttle vans, transit passes and/or secure bicycle parking for construction worker commutes.
 Reduce electricity use in the construction office by using compact fluorescent bulbs, powering off computers every day, and replacing heating and cooling units with more efficient ones.  Recycle or salvage non-hazardous construction and demolition debris (goal of at least 75% by weight).  Use locally sourced or recycled materials for construction materials (goal of at least 20% based on costs for building materials, and based on volume for roadway, parking lot, sidewalk and curb materials).  Minimize the amount of concrete used for paved surfaces or use a low carbon concrete option.  Produce concrete on-site if determined to be less emissive than transporting ready mix.  Use EPA-certified SmartWay trucks for deliveries and equipment transport. Additional information about the SmartWay Transport Partnership Program is available from ARB’s Heavy-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Measure (ARB 2009c) and EPA (EPA 2009).
 Develop a plan in consultation with SMAQMD to efficiently use water for adequate dust control. This may consist of the use of nonpotable water from a local source.

In addition to SMAQMD-recommended measures, construction activity shall comply with all applicable rules and regulations established by SMAQMD and ARB.
106
-36
3A.4-2b
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Participate in and Implement an Urban and Community Forestry Program and/or Off-Site Tree Program to Off-Set Loss of On-Site Trees. The trees on the project site contain sequestered carbon and would continue to provide future carbon sequestration during their growing life. For all harvestable trees that are subject to removal, the project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application shall participate in and provide necessary funding for urban and community forestry program (such as the UrbanWood program managed by the Urban Forest Ecosystems Institute [Urban Forest Ecosystems Institute 2009]) to ensure that wood with an equivalent carbon sequestration value to that of all harvestable removed trees is harvested for an end-use that would retain its carbon sequestration (e.g., furniture building, cabinet making). For all nonharvestable trees that are subject to removal, the project applicant(s) shall develop and fund an off-site tree program that includes a level of tree planting that, at a minimum, increases Before approval
of final maps
and/or building
permits for all
project phases
requiring
discretionary
approval,
including all
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The owner/applicant worked with an
organization Urban Wood Rescue which
is a program in association with the
Sacramento Tree Foundation that makes
wood products from large trees that are
removed as a result of development. The
owner/applicant provided most of the
large trees that were removed as a part of
the grading and construction for the
project to Urban Wood Rescue and they
Yes

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

carbon sequestration by an amount equivalent to what would have been sequestered by the blue oak woodland during its lifetime. This program shall be funded by the project applicant(s) of each development phase and reviewed for comment by an independent Certified Arborist unaffiliated with the project applicant(s) and shall be coordinated with the requirements of Mitigation Measure 3.3-5, as stated in Section 3A.3, “Biological Resources - Land.” Final approval of the program shall be provided by the City.

Components of the program may include, but not be limited to, providing urban tree canopy in the City of Folsom, or reforestation in suitable areas outside the City. Reforestation in natural habitat areas outside the City of Folsom would simultaneously mitigate the loss of oak woodland habitat while planting trees within the urban forest canopy would not. The California Urban Forestry Greenhouse Gas Reporting Protocol shall be used to assess this mitigation program (CCAR 2008). All unused vegetation and tree material shall be mulched for use in landscaping on the project site, shipped to the nearest composting facility, or shipped to a landfill that is equipped with a methane collection system, or combusted in a biomass power plant. Tree and vegetative material should not be burned on- or off-site unless used as fuel in a biomass power plant. on- and off-site
elements.
made table, furniture, etc. from the trees
that were provided. The remaining trees
and tree canopy was mulched by the
owner/applicant and is stored on site to
use as mulch in the landscape areas
throughout the project. No removed trees
were transported to the landfill in
accordance with this condition of
approval.

Hazards and Hazardous Materials
106
-37
3A.8-2 (FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Complete Investigations Related to the Extent to Which Soil and/or Groundwater May Have Been Contaminated in Areas Not Covered by the Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments and Implement Required Measures.

The project applicant(s) for any discretionary development application shall conduct Phase I Environmental Site Assessments (where an Phase I has not been conducted), and if necessary, Phase II Environmental Site Assessments, and/or other appropriate testing for all areas of the SPA and include, as necessary, analysis of soil and/or groundwater samples for the potential contamination sites that have not yet been covered by previous investigations (as shown in Exhibit 3A.8-1) before construction activities begin in those areas. Recommendations in the Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments to address any contamination that is found shall be implemented before initiating ground-disturbing activities in these areas.

The project applicant(s) shall implement the following measures before ground-disturbing activities to reduce health hazards associated with potential exposure to hazardous substances:
 Prepare a plan that identifies any necessary remediation activities appropriate for proposed on- and off- site uses, including excavation and removal of on-site contaminated soils, redistribution of clean fill material in the SPA, and closure of any abandoned mine shafts. The plan shall include measures that ensure the safe transport, use, and disposal of contaminated soil and building debris removed from the site. In the event that contaminated groundwater is encountered during site excavation activities, the contractor shall report the contamination to the appropriate regulatory agencies, dewater the excavated area, and treat the contaminated groundwater to remove contaminants before discharge into the sanitary sewer system. The project applicant(s) shall be required to comply with the plan and applicable Federal, state, and local laws. The plan shall outline measures for specific handling and reporting procedures for hazardous materials and disposal of hazardous materials removed from the site at an appropriate off-site disposal facility.
 Notify the appropriate Federal, state, and local agencies if evidence of previously undiscovered soil or groundwater contamination (e.g., stained soil, odorous groundwater) is encountered during construction Before and
during earth
moving
activities
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The subdivision is not within any
identified area where contaminated
groundwater is present. Therefore there
is no required Phase 1 or Phase 2
Environmental Assessment required.

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

activities. Any contaminated areas shall be remediated in accordance with recommendations made by the Sacramento County Environmental Management Department, Central Valley RWQCB, DTSC, and/or other appropriate Federal, state, or local regulatory agencies.  Obtain an assessment conducted by PG&E and SMUD pertaining to the contents of any existing pole- mounted transformers located in the SPA. The assessment shall determine whether existing on-site electrical transformers contain PCBs and whether there are any records of spills from such equipment. If equipment containing PCB is identified, the maintenance and/or disposal of the transformer shall be subject to the regulations of the Toxic Substances Control Act under the authority of the Sacramento County Environmental Health Department.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom’s jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., Sacramento County).
106
-38
3A.8-6 (FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Prudent Avoidance and Notification of EMF Exposure. Potential purchasers of residential properties near the transmission lines shall be made aware of the controversy surrounding EMF exposure. The California Department of Real Estate shall be requested to insert an appropriate notification into the applicant’s final Subdivision Public Report application, which shall be provided to purchasers of properties within 100 feet from the 100-115kV power line , or within 150 feet from the 220-230 kV power line . The notification would include a discussion of the scientific studies and conclusions reached to date, acknowledge that the notification distance is not based on specific biological evidence, but rather, the distance where background levels may increase, and provide that, given some uncertainty in the data, this notification is merely provided to allow purchasers to make an informed decision.

At the
submission of
tentative map
applications.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
There are no overhead powerlines
existing within this subdivision and all
proposed and future utility lines to serve
this subdivision will be placed
underground in accordance with the
subdivision’s conditions of approval.

106
-39
3A.8-7 (FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Prepare and Implement a Vector Control Plan in Consultation with the Sacramento-Yolo Mosquito and Vector Control District. To ensure that operation and design of the stormwater system, including multiple planned detention basins, is consistent with the recommendations of the Sacramento-Yolo Mosquito and Vector Control District regarding mosquito control, the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall prepare and implement a Vector Control Plan. This plan shall be prepared in coordination with the Sacramento-Yolo Mosquito and Vector Control District and shall be submitted to the City for approval before issuance of the grading permit for the detention basins under the City’s jurisdiction. For the off-site detention basin, the plan shall be submitted to Sacramento County for approval before issuance of the grading permit for the off-site detention basin. The plan shall incorporate specific measures deemed sufficient by the City to minimize public health risks from mosquitoes, and as contained within the Sacramento-Yolo Mosquito and Vector Control District BMP Manual (Sacramento-Yolo Mosquito and Vector Control District 2008). The plan shall include, but is not limited to, the following components:
 Description of the project.
 Description of detention basins and all water features and facilities that would control on-site water levels.
 Goals of the plan.
 Description of the water management elements and features that would be implemented, including:

Before issuance
of grading
permits for the
project water
features.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The City and its Environmental
Compliance Consultant (Helix) have
reviewed all MMRP conditions and
verified compliance with this Mitigation
Measure. Compliance was verified prior
to commencement of grading and
construction in the Summer of 2020. The
compliance table is on file with the City
.

Yes

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

 BMPs that would implemented on-site;
 public education and awareness;
 sanitary methods used (e.g., disposal of garbage);
 mosquito control methods used (e.g., fluctuating water levels, biological agents, pesticides, larvacides, circulating water); and
 stormwater management (consistent with Stormwater Management Plan).  Long-term maintenance of the detention basins and all related facilities (e.g., specific ongoing enforceable conditions or maintenance by a homeowner’s association).

To reduce the potential for mosquitoes to reproduce in the detention basins, the project applicant(s) shall coordinate with the Sacramento-Yolo Mosquito and Vector Control District to identify and implement BMPs based on their potential effectiveness for SPA conditions. Potential BMPs could include, but are not limited to, the following:
 build shoreline perimeters as steep and uniform as practicable to discourage dense plant growth;  perform routine maintenance to reduce emergent plant densities to facilitate the ability of mosquito predators (i.e., fish) to move throughout vegetated area;  design distribution piping and containment basins with adequate slopes to drain fully and prevent standing water. The design slope should take into consideration buildup of sediment between maintenance periods. Compaction during grading may also be needed to avoid slumping and settling;  coordinate cleaning of catch basins, drop inlets, or storm drains with mosquito treatment operations;  enforce the prompt removal of silt screens installed during construction when no longer needed to protect water quality;
 if the sump, vault, or basin is sealed against mosquitoes, with the exception of the inlet and outlet, submerge the inlet and outlet completely to reduce the available surface area of water for mosquito egg– laying (female mosquitoes can fly through pipes); and
 design structures with the appropriate pumping, piping, valves, or other necessary equipment to allow for easy dewatering of the unit if necessary (Sacramento Yolo Mosquito and Vector Control District 2008).

The project applicant(s) of the project phase containing the off-site detention basin shall coordinate mitigation for the off-site with the affected oversight agency (i.e., Sacramento County).

Hydrology and Water Quality
106
-40
3A.9-1 (FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Acquire Appropriate Regulatory Permits and Prepare and Implement SWPPP and BMPs. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the project applicant(s) of all projects disturbing one or more acres (including phased construction of smaller areas which are part of a larger project) shall obtain coverage under the SWRCB’s NPDES stormwater permit for general construction activity (Order 2009-0009-DWQ), including preparation and submittal of a project-specific SWPPP at the time the NOI is filed. The project applicant(s) shall also prepare and submit any other necessary erosion and sediment control and engineering plans and specifications for pollution prevention and control to Sacramento County, City of Folsom, El Dorado County Submittal of the
State
Construction
General Permit
NOI and
SWPPP (where
applicable) and
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The Owner/applicant has received a
NPDES permit from the State Regional
Water Quality Control Board
(SRWQCB). The NDES Permit
requires the implementation of BMP’s,
monitoring and reporting for stormwater
runoff. The NPDES Permit includes a
Yes

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

(for the off-site roadways into El Dorado Hills under the Proposed Project Alternative). The SWPPP and other appropriate plans shall identify and specify:
 the use of an effective combination of robust erosion and sediment control BMPs and construction techniques accepted by the local jurisdictions for use in the project area at the time of construction, that shall reduce the potential for runoff and the release, mobilization, and exposure of pollutants, including legacy sources of mercury from project-related construction sites. These may include but would not be limited to temporary erosion control and soil stabilization measures, sedimentation ponds, inlet protection, perforated riser pipes, check dams, and silt fences  the implementation of approved local plans, non-stormwater management controls, permanent post- construction BMPs, and inspection and maintenance responsibilities;  the pollutants that are likely to be used during construction that could be present in stormwater drainage and nonstormwater discharges, including fuels, lubricants, and other types of materials used for equipment operation;
 spill prevention and contingency measures, including measures to prevent or clean up spills of hazardous waste and of hazardous materials used for equipment operation, and emergency procedures for responding to spills;
 personnel training requirements and procedures that shall be used to ensure that workers are aware of permit requirements and proper installation methods for BMPs specified in the SWPPP; and  the appropriate personnel responsible for supervisory duties related to implementation of the SWPPP.  Where applicable, BMPs identified in the SWPPP shall be in place throughout all site work and construction/demolition activities and shall be used in all subsequent site development activities. BMPs may include, but are not limited to, such measures as those listed below.  Implementing temporary erosion and sediment control measures in disturbed areas to minimize discharge of sediment into nearby drainage conveyances, in compliance with state and local standards in effect at the time of construction. These measures may include silt fences, staked straw bales or wattles, sediment/silt basins and traps, geofabric, sandbag dikes, and temporary vegetation.  Establishing permanent vegetative cover to reduce erosion in areas disturbed by construction by slowing runoff velocities, trapping sediment, and enhancing filtration and transpiration.  Using drainage swales, ditches, and earth dikes to control erosion and runoff by conveying surface runoff down sloping land, intercepting and diverting runoff to a watercourse or channel, preventing sheet flow over sloped surfaces, preventing runoff accumulation at the base of a grade, and avoiding flood damage along roadways and facility infrastructure.

A copy of the approved SWPPP shall be maintained and available at all times on the construction site.

For those areas that would be disturbed as part of the U.S. 50 interchange improvements, Caltrans shall coordinate with the development and implementation of the overall project SWPPP, or develop and development
and submittal of
any other
locally required
plans and
specifications
before the
issuance of
grading permits
for all on-site
project phases
and off-site
elements and
implementation
throughout
project
construction.

Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWPPP), which outlines monitoring
standards, frequency and baseline
modeling. The Owner/applicant has
submitted monthly reports to the City
and SRWQCB.

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

implement its own SWPPP specific to the interchange improvements, to ensure that water quality degradation would be avoided or minimized to the maximum extent practicable.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom’s jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or Sacramento Counties, or Caltrans). 106
-41
3A.9-2 (FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Prepare and Submit Final Drainage Plans and Implement Requirements Contained in Those Plans.

Before the approval of grading plans and building permits, the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall submit final drainage plans to the City, and to El Dorado County for the off-site roadway connections into El Dorado Hills, demonstrating that off-site upstream runoff would be appropriately conveyed through the SPA, and that project-related on-site runoff would be appropriately contained in detention basins or managed with through other improvements (e.g., source controls, biotechnical stream stabilization) to reduce flooding and hydromodfication impacts.

The plans shall include, but not be limited to, the following items:
 an accurate calculation of pre-project and post-project runoff scenarios, obtained using appropriate engineering methods, that accurately evaluates potential changes to runoff, including increased surface runoff;
 runoff calculations for the 10-year and 100-year (0.01 AEP) storm events (and other, smaller storm events as required) shall be performed and the trunk drainage pipeline sizes confirmed based on alignments and detention facility locations finalized in the design phase;  a description of the proposed maintenance program for the on-site drainage system;  project-specific standards for installing drainage systems;  City and El Dorado County flood control design requirements and measures designed to comply with them;
Implementation of stormwater management BMPs that avoid increases in the erosive force of flows beyond a specific range of conditions needed to limit hydromodification and maintain current stream geomorphology.

These BMPs will be designed and constructed in accordance with the forthcoming SSQP Hydromodification Management Plan (to be adopted by the RWQCB) and may
include, but are not limited to, the following:
 use of Low Impact Development (LID) techniques to limit increases in stormwater runoff at the point of origination (these may include, but are not limited to: surface swales; replacement of conventional impervious surfaces with pervious surfaces [e.g., porous pavement]; impervious surfaces disconnection; and trees planted to intercept stormwater);
 enlarged detention basins to minimize flow changes and changes to flow duration characteristics;  bioengineered stream stabilization to minimize bank erosion, utilizing vegetative and rock stabilization, and inset floodplain restoration features that provide for enhancement of riparian habitat and maintenance of natural hydrologic and channel to floodplain interactions; Before approval
of grading plans
and building
permits of all
project phases.

City of Folsom
Public Works
Department
The Owner/applicant has received a
NPDES permit from the State Regional
Water Quality Control Board
(SRWQCB). The NDES Permit
requires the implementation of BMP’s,
monitoring and reporting for stormwater
runoff. The NPDES Permit includes a
Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWPPP), which outlines monitoring
standards, frequency and baseline
modeling. The Owner/applicant has
submitted monthly reports to the City
and SRWQCB.

Yes

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

 minimize slope differences between any stormwater or detention facility outfall channel with the existing receiving channel gradient to reduce flow velocity; and  minimize to the extent possible detention basin, bridge embankment, and other encroachments into the channel and floodplain corridor, and utilize open bottom box culverts to allow sediment passage on smaller drainage courses.

The final drainage plan shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City of Folsom Community Development and Public Works Departments and El Dorado County Department of Transportation that 100-year (0.01 AEP) flood flows would be appropriately channeled and contained, such that the risk to people or damage to structures within or down gradient of the SPA would not occur, and that hydromodification would not be increased from pre-development levels such that existing stream geomorphology would be changed (the range of conditions should be calculated for each receiving water if feasible, or a conservative estimate should be used, e.g., an Ep of 1 ±10% or other as approved by the Sacramento Stormwater Quality Partnership and/or City of Folsom Public Works Department).

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom’s jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase with El Dorado County. 106
-42
3A.9-3 (FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Develop and Implement a BMP and Water Quality Maintenance Plan. Before approval of the grading permits for any development project requiring a subdivision map, a detailed BMP and water quality maintenance plan shall be prepared by a qualified engineer retained by the project applicant(s) the development project. Drafts of the plan shall be submitted to the City of Folsom and El Dorado County for the off-site roadway connections into El Dorado Hills, for review and approval concurrently with development of tentative subdivision maps for all project phases. The plan shall finalize the water quality improvements and further detail the structural and nonstructural BMPs proposed for the project. The plan shall include the elements described below.
 A quantitative hydrologic and water quality analysis of proposed conditions incorporating the proposed drainage design features.
 Predevelopment and post development calculations demonstrating that the proposed water quality BMPs meet or exceed requirements established by the City of Folsom and including details regarding the size, geometry, and functional timing of storage and release pursuant to the ’“Stormwater Quality Design Manual for Sacramento and South Placer Regions” ([SSQP 2007b] per NPDES Permit No. CAS082597 WDR Order No. R5-2008-0142, page 46) and El Dorado County’s NPDES SWMP (County of El Dorado 2004).
 Source control programs to control water quality pollutants on the SPA, which may include but are limited to recycling, street sweeping, storm drain cleaning, household hazardous waste collection, waste minimization, prevention of spills and illegal dumping, and effective management of public trash collection areas.
 A pond management component for the proposed basins that shall include management and maintenance requirements for the design features and BMPs, and responsible parties for maintenance and funding.

Prepare plans
before the
issuance of
grading permits
for all project
phases and off-
site elements
and
implementation
throughout
project
construction.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department and
Public Works
Department
The Owner/applicant has received a
NPDES permit from the State Regional
Water Quality Control Board
(SRWQCB). The NDES Permit
requires the implementation of BMP’s,
monitoring and reporting for stormwater
runoff. The NPDES Permit includes a
Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWPPP), which outlines monitoring
standards, frequency and baseline
modeling. The Owner/applicant has
submitted monthly reports to the City
and SRWQCB.

The owner/applicant has prepared storm
drain design reports and provided storm
drain calculations for all of the proposed
storm drainage features and
detention/water quality and
hydromodification basins necessary to
serve this subdivision. These reports
have been reviewed and approved by the
Community Development and Public
Works Departments.

Yes

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

 LID control measures shall be integrated into the BMP and water quality maintenance plan. These may include, but are not limited to:
 surface swales;
 replacement of conventional impervious surfaces with pervious surfaces (e.g., porous pavement);  impervious surfaces disconnection; and
 trees planted to intercept stormwater.

New stormwater facilities shall be placed along the natural drainage courses within the SPA to the extent practicable so as to mimic the natural drainage patterns. The reduction in runoff as a result of the LID configurations shall be quantified based on the runoff reduction credit system methodology described in “Stormwater Quality Design Manual for the Sacramento and South Placer Regions, Chapter 5 and Appendix D4” (SSQP 2007b) and proposed detention basins and other water quality BMPs shall be sized to handle these runoff volumes.

For those areas that would be disturbed as part of the U.S. 50 interchange improvements, it is anticipated that Caltrans would coordinate with the development and implementation of the overall project SWPPP, or develop and implement its own SWPPP specific to the interchange improvements, to ensure that water quality degradation would be avoided or minimized to the maximum extent practicable.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom’s jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase with El Dorado County and Caltrans. 106
-43
3A.9-4 (FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Inspect and Evaluate Existing Dams Within and Upstream of the Project Site and Make Improvements if Necessary. Prior to submittal to the City of tentative maps or improvement plans the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall perform conduct studies to determine the extent of inundation in the case of dam failure. If the studies determine potential exposure of people or structures to a significant risk of flooding as a result of the failure of a dam, the applicants(s) shall implement of any feasible recommendations provided in that study, potentially through drainage improvements, subject to the approval of the City of Folsom Public Works Department.

Prior to
submittal to the
City of tentative
maps or
improvement
plans.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
There are no existing or proposed dams
upstream from this subdivision and
therefore there is no requirement to
perform the analysis required in this
condition of approval.

Noise and Vibration
106
-44
3A.11-1
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Implement Noise-Reducing Construction Practices, Prepare and Implement a Noise Control Plan, and Monitor and Record Construction Noise near Sensitive Receptors. To reduce impacts associated with noise generated during project related construction activities, the project applicant(s) and their primary contractors for engineering design and construction of all project phases shall ensure that the following requirements are implemented at each work site in any year of project construction to avoid and minimize construction noise effects on sensitive receptors. The project applicant(s) and primary construction contractor(s) shall employ noise-reducing construction practices. Measures that shall be used to limit noise shall include the measures listed below:
 Noise-generating construction operations shall be limited to the hours between 7 a.m. and 7 p.m.

Monday through Friday, and between 8 a.m. and 6 p.m. on Saturdays and Sundays.

Before and
during
construction
activities on the
SPA and within
El Dorado
Hills.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The owner/applicant has implemented
noise reducing construction practices
included as part of the required Noise
Control Plan. Compliance with these
requirements has been monitored
through construction inspection.

Yes

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

 All construction equipment and equipment staging areas shall be located as far as possible from nearby noise-sensitive land uses.
 All construction equipment shall be properly maintained and equipped with noise-reduction intake and exhaust mufflers and engine shrouds, in accordance with manufacturers’ recommendations. Equipment engine shrouds shall be closed during equipment operation.  All motorized construction equipment shall be shut down when not in use to prevent idling.  Individual operations and techniques shall be replaced with quieter procedures (e.g., using welding instead of riveting, mixing concrete offsite instead of on-site).  Noise-reducing enclosures shall be used around stationary noise-generating equipment (e.g., compressors and generators) as planned phases are built out and future noise sensitive receptors are located within close proximity to future construction activities.  Written notification of construction activities shall be provided to all noise-sensitive receptors located within 850 feet of construction activities. Notification shall include anticipated dates and hours during which construction activities are anticipated to occur and contact information, including a daytime telephone number, for the project representative to be contacted in the event that noise levels are deemed excessive. Recommendations to assist noise-sensitive land uses in reducing interior noise levels (e.g., closing windows and doors) shall also be included in the notification.  To the extent feasible, acoustic barriers (e.g., lead curtains, sound barriers) shall be constructed to reduce construction-generated noise levels at affected noise-sensitive land uses. The barriers shall be designed to obstruct the line of sight between the noise-sensitive land use and on-site construction equipment.

When installed properly, acoustic barriers can reduce construction noise levels by approximately 8–10 dB (EPA 1971).
 When future noise sensitive uses are within close proximity to prolonged construction noise, noise- attenuating buffers such as structures, truck trailers, or soil piles shall be located between noise sources and future residences to shield sensitive receptors from construction noise.  The primary contractor shall prepare and implement a construction noise management plan. This plan shall identify specific measures to ensure compliance with the noise control measures specified above.

The noise control plan shall be submitted to the City of Folsom before any noise-generating construction activity begins. Construction shall not commence until the construction noise management plan is approved by the City of Folsom. Mitigation for the two off-site roadway connections into El Dorado County must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of the applicable project phase with El Dorado County, since the roadway extensions are outside of the City of Folsom’s jurisdictional boundaries. 106
-45
3A.11-3
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Implement Measures to Prevent Exposure of Sensitive Receptors to Groundborne Noise or Vibration from Project Generated Construction Activities.
 To the extent feasible, blasting activities shall not be conducted within 275 feet of existing or future sensitive receptors.

Before and
during
bulldozing and
blasting
activities on the
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Blasting has been necessary throughout
the course of grading and construction in
this subdivision. The blasting has not
been within 2000 feet of any sensitive
receptor. The blasting contractor has
Yes

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

 To the extent feasible, bulldozing activities shall not be conducted within 50 feet of existing or future sensitive receptors.
 All blasting shall be performed by a blast contractor and blasting personnel licensed to operate in the State of California.
 A blasting plan, including estimates of vibration levels at the residence closest to the blast, shall be submitted to the enforcement agency for review and approval prior to the commencement of the first blast.
 Each blast shall be monitored and documented for groundbourne noise and vibration levels at the nearest sensitive land use and associated recorded submitted to the enforcement agency.

SPA and within
El Dorado Hills
and the County
of Sacramento
obtained a blasting permit from the City
and the Community Development
Department has verified compliance with
the permit through construction
inspection.
106
-46
3A.11-5
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Implement Measures to Reduce Noise from Project-Generated Stationary Sources.

The project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development project shall implement the following measures to reduce the effect of noise levels generated by on-site stationary noise sources that would be located within 600 feet of any noise-sensitive receptor:
 Routine testing and preventive maintenance of emergency electrical generators shall be conducted during the less sensitive daytime hours (i.e., 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.). All electrical generators shall be equipped with noise control (e.g., muffler) devices in accordance with manufacturers’ specifications.  External mechanical equipment associated with buildings shall incorporate features designed to reduce noise emissions below the stationary noise source criteria. These features may include, but are not limited to, locating generators within equipment rooms or enclosures that incorporate noise-reduction features, such as acoustical louvers, and exhaust and intake silencers. Equipment enclosures shall be oriented so that major openings (i.e., intake louvers, exhaust) are directed away from nearby noise- sensitive receptors.
 Parking lots shall be located and designed so that noise emissions do not exceed the stationary noise source criteria established in this analysis (i.e., 50 dB for 30 minutes in every hour during the daytime [7 a.m. to 10 p.m.] and less than 45 dB for 30 minutes of every hour during the night time [10 p.m. to 7 a.m.]). Reduction of parking lot noise can be achieved by locating parking lots as far away as feasible from noise sensitive land uses, or using buildings and topographic features to provide acoustic shielding for noise-sensitive land uses.
 Loading docks shall be located and designed so that noise emissions do not exceed the stationary noise source criteria established in this analysis (i.e., 50 dB for 30 minutes in every hour during the daytime [7 a.m. to 10 p.m.] and less than 45 dB for 30 minutes of every hour during the night time [10 p.m. to 7 a.m.]). Reduction of loading dock noise can be achieved by locating loading docks as far away as possible from noise sensitive land uses, constructing noise barriers between loading docks and noise- sensitive land uses, or using buildings and topographic features to provide acoustic shielding for noise- sensitive land uses.

Before
submittal of
improvement
plans for each
project phase,
and during
project
operations for
testing of
emergency
generators.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The owner/applicant has implemented
noise reducing construction practices
included as part of the required Noise
Control Plan. Compliance with these
requirements has been monitored
through construction inspection.

There are no sensitive receptors within
600 feet of any on-going construction
and grading activity in the subdivision.

Yes

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

106
-47

4.13-1
(Addendum)
Exterior Traffic Noise Reduction Measures
Prior to building occupancy, the project applicant shall design and construct noise barriers, as detailed below, to reduce traffic noise levels below the City of Folsom exterior criteria of 60 dB Ldn.  6-foot tall solid noise barriers, relative to backyard elevations, shall be constructed along all property boundaries adjacent to East Bidwell Street, Mangini Parkway, and Oak Avenue Parkway.  For the proposed Traditional Subdivisions portion of the project, a 7-foot tall solid noise barrier, relative to backyard elevations, shall be constructed along all property boundaries adjacent to White Rock Road.  For the proposed Regency at Folsom Ranch Phase 1 and Phase 2 portions of the project, an 8-foot tall solid noise barrier, relative to backyard elevations, shall be constructed along all property boundaries adjacent to White Rock Road.

Suitable materials for the traffic noise barriers include masonry and precast concrete panels. The overall barrier height may be achieved by utilizing a barrier and earthen berm combination. Other materials may be acceptable but shall be reviewed by an acoustical consultant prior to use.

Barrier height requirements are based on a property boundary setback of 117-122 feet from the ultimate alignment of White Rock Road under the approved Capital Southeast Connector project. If 90 days prior to pulling building permits for the Toll Brothers site, it is determined that there is no evidence that the White Rock Road improvements are funded and moving forward, as described under the approved Capital Southeast Connector project, the project applicant shall obtain the services of a noise consultant to reconduct a site-specific acoustical analysis based on the actual property boundary setback to determine the appropriate noise reduction measures to reduce traffic noise levels in accordance with adopted City of Folsom noise standards.

Prior to
building
occupancy
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The landscape and streetscape plans for
the subdivision include the required
masonry walls in the required height and
required locations. The Community
Development Department will monitor
compliance during construction and
verify that the sound walls are complete
prior to issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy in the subdivision.

106
-48

4.13-2
(Addendum)
Interior Traffic Noise Reduction Measures
Prior to building occupancy, the project applicant shall ensure the following construction design features have been implemented.
 For the first-row of homes located along White Rock Road, the west-, south-, and east-facing upper-floor building facades shall maintain minimum window assembly STC ratings of 34.  Mechanical ventilation (air conditioning) shall be provided for all residences in this development to allow the occupants to close doors and windows as desired to achieve compliance with the applicable interior noise level criteria.

Prior to
building
occupancy
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The Community Development
Department will monitor compliance
during construction and verify that the
sound walls are complete prior to
issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy in
the subdivision.

Public Services
106
-49
3A.14-1
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Prepare and Implement a Construction Traffic Control Plan. The project applicant(s) of all project phases shall prepare and implement traffic control plans for construction activities that may affect road rights-of-way. The traffic control plans must follow any applicable standards of the agency responsible for the affected roadway and must be approved and signed by a professional engineer. Measures typically used in traffic control plans include advertising of planned lane closures, warning signage, a flag person to direct traffic flows when needed, and methods to ensure continued access by emergency vehicles. During project construction, access to existing land uses shall be maintained at all times, with detours used as necessary Before the
approval of all
relevant plans
and/or permits
and during
construction of
City of Folsom
Public Works
Department
The Community Development
Department has reviewed and
approved all traffic control plans
required for the construction of both
off-site and on-site improvements
for this subdivision to verify
compliance with City ordinances and

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

during road closures. Traffic control plans shall be submitted to the appropriate City or County department or the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) for review and approval before the approval of all project plans or permits, for all project phases where implementation may cause impacts on traffic.

Mitigation for the off-site elements outside of the City of Folsom’s jurisdictional boundaries must be coordinated by the project applicant(s) of each applicable project phase with the affected oversight agency(ies) (i.e., El Dorado and/or Sacramento Counties and Caltrans). all project
phases.
to minimize delays to the travelling
public.

There are no off-site elements outside
the City limits for this subdivision.
106
-50
3A.14-2
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Incorporate California Fire Code; City of Folsom Fire Code Requirements; and EDHFD Requirements, if Necessary, into Project Design and Submit Project Design to the City of Folsom Fire Department for Review and Approval.

To reduce impacts related to the provision of new fire services, the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall do the following, as described below.

1. Incorporate into project designs fire flow requirements based on the California Fire Code, Folsom Fire Code (City of Folsom Municipal Code Title 8, Chapter 8.36), and other applicable requirements based on the City of Folsom Fire Department fire prevention standards.

Improvement plans showing the incorporation automatic sprinkler systems, the availability of adequate fire flow, and the locations of hydrants shall be submitted to the City of Folsom Fire Department for review and approval. In addition, approved plans showing access design shall be provided to the City of Folsom Fire Department as described by Zoning Code Section 17.57.080 (“Vehicular Access Requirements”). These plans shall describe access-road length, dimensions, and finished surfaces for firefighting equipment. The installation of security gates across a fire apparatus access road shall be approved by the City of Folsom Fire Department. The design and operation of gates and barricades shall be in accordance with the Sacramento County Emergency Access Gates and Barriers Standard, as required by the City of Folsom Fire Code.

2. Submit a Fire Systems New Buildings, Additions, and Alterations Document Submittal List to the City of Folsom Community Development Department Building Division for review and approval before the issuance of building permits.

In addition to the above measures, the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall incorporate the provisions described below for the portion of the SPA within the EDHFD service area, if it is determined through City/El Dorado County negotiations that EDHFD would serve the 178-acre portion of the SPA.

3. Incorporate into project designs applicable requirements based on the EDHFD fire prevention standards.

For commercial development, improvement plans showing roadways, land splits, buildings, fire sprinkler systems, fire alarm systems, and other commercial building improvements shall be submitted to the EDHFD for review and approval. For residential development, improvement plans showing property lines and adjacent streets or roads; total acreage or square footage of the parcel; the footprint of all structures; driveway plan views describing width, length, turnouts, turnarounds, radiuses, and surfaces; and driveway profile views showing the percent grade from the access road to the structure and vertical clearance shall be submitted to the EDHFD for review and approval.

4. Submit a Fire Prevention Plan Checklist to the EDHFD for review and approval before the issuance of building permits. In addition, residential development requiring automation fire sprinklers shall submit sprinkler design sheet(s) and hydraulic calculations from a California State Licensed C-16 Contractor.

Before issuance
of building
permits and
issuance of
occupancy
permits or final
inspections for
all project
phases.

City of Folsom
Fire
Department,
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The City Fire Department has reviewed
and approved all proposed improvements
for the subdivision. The City FD will
verify adequate fire flow prior to
building permit issuance in the
subdivision.

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

The City shall not authorize the occupancy of any structures until the project applicant(s) have obtained a Certificate of Occupancy from the City of Folsom Community Development Department verifying that all fire prevention items have been addressed on-site to the satisfaction of the City of Folsom Fire Department and/or the EDHFD for the 178-acre area of the SPA within the EDHFD service area. 106
-51
3A.14-3
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Incorporate Fire Flow Requirements into Project Designs. The project applicant(s) of all project phases shall incorporate into their project designs fire flow requirements based on the California Fire Code, Folsom Fire Code, and/or EDHFD for those areas of the SPA within the EDHFD service area and shall verify to City of Folsom Fire Department that adequate water flow is
available, prior to approval of improvement plans and issuance of occupancy permits or final inspections for all project phases.

Before issuance
of building
permits and
issuance of
occupancy
permits or final
inspections for
all project
phases.

City of Folsom
Fire
Department,
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The City Fire Department has reviewed
and approved all proposed improvements
for the subdivision. The City FD will
verify adequate fire flow prior to
building permit issuance in the
subdivision.

Traffic and Transportation
106
-52
3A.15-1a
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the Construction of Improvements to the Folsom Boulevard/Blue Ravine Road Intersection (Intersection 1). To ensure that the Folsom Boulevard/Blue Ravine Road intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the eastbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of two left-turn lanes, one through lane, and one right-turn lane. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the Folsom Boulevard/Blue Ravine Road intersection (Intersection 1).

A phasing
analysis shall be
performed prior
to approval of
the first
subdivision
map to
determine when
the
improvement
should be
implemented
and when fair
share funding
should be paid.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

106
-53
3A.15-1b
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)

The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the Construction of Improvements at the Sibley Street/Blue Ravine Road Intersection (Intersection 2). To ensure that the Sibley Street/Blue Ravine Road intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of two left-turn lanes, two through lanes, and one right-turn lane. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the Sibley Street/Blue Ravine Road intersection (Intersection 2).

A phasing
analysis shall be
performed prior
to approval of
the first
subdivision
map to
determine when
the
improvement
should be
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

implemented
and when fair
share funding
should be paid.
106
-54
3A.15-1c
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
The Applicant Shall Fund and Construct Improvements to the Scott Road (West)/White Rock Road Intersection (Intersection 28). To ensure that the Scott Road (West)/White Rock Road intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, a traffic signal must be installed.

A phasing
analysis shall be
performed prior
to approval of
the first
subdivision
map to
determine when
the
improvement
should be
implemented.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

106
-55
3A.15-1e
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Fund and Construct Improvements to the Hillside Drive/Easton Valley Parkway Intersection (Intersection 41). To ensure that the Hillside Drive/Easton Valley Parkway intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the eastbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of one dedicated left turn lane and two through lanes, and the westbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of two through lanes and one dedicated right-turn lane. The applicant shall fund and construct these improvements.

A phasing
analysis shall be
performed prior
to approval of
the first
subdivision
map to
determine when
the
improvement
should be
implemented.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

106
-56
3A.15-1f
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Fund and Construct Improvements to the Oak Avenue Parkway/Middle Road Intersection (Intersection 44). To ensure that the Oak Avenue Parkway/Middle Road intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, control all movements with a stop sign. The applicant shall fund and construct these improvements.

A phasing
analysis shall be
performed prior
to approval of
the first
subdivision
map to
determine when
the
improvement
should be
implemented.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

106
-57
3A.15-1h
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts to the Hazel Avenue/Folsom Boulevard Intersection (Sacramento County Intersection 2). To ensure that the Hazel Avenue/Folsom Boulevard intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, this intersection must be grade separated including “jug handle” ramps. No at grade improvement is feasible. Grade separating and extended (south) Hazel Avenue with improvements to the U.S. 50/Hazel Avenue interchange is a mitigation measure for the approved Easton-Glenbrough Specific Plan development project. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the Hazel Avenue/Folsom Boulevard intersection (Sacramento County Intersection 2).

A phasing
analysis shall be
performed prior
to approval of
the first
subdivision
map to
determine when
the
improvement
should be
implemented.

Sacramento
County Public
Works
Department and
Caltrans
This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

106
-58
3A.15-1i
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on the Grant Line Road/White Rock Road Intersection and to White Rock Road widening between the Rancho Cordova City limit to Prairie City Road (Sacramento County Intersection 3).

Improvements must be made to ensure that the
Grant Line Road/White Rock Road intersection operates at an acceptable LOS. The currently County proposed White Rock Road widening project will widen and realign White Rock Road from the Rancho Cordova City limit to the El Dorado County line (this analysis assumes that the Proposed Project and build alternatives will widen White Rock Road to five lanes from Prairie City road to the El Dorado County Line).

This widening includes improvements to the Grant Line Road intersection and realigning White Rock Road to be the through movement. The improvements include two eastbound through lanes, one eastbound right turn lane, two northbound left turn lanes, two northbound right turn lanes, two westbound left turn lanes and two westbound through lanes. This improvement also includes the signalization of the White Rock Road and Grant Line Road intersection. With implementation of this improvement, the intersection would operate at an acceptable LOS A. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the Grant Line Road/White Rock Road intersection (Sacramento County Intersection 3).

Before project
build out.

Design of the
White Rock
Road widening
to four lanes,
from Grant Line
Road to Prairie
City Road, with
Intersection
improvements
has begun, and
because this
widening
project is
environmentally
cleared and
fully funded,
it’s construction
is expected to
be complete
before the first
phase of the
Proposed
Project or
alternative is
built.

Sacramento
County Public
Works
Department
This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

106
-59
3A.15-1j
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Hazel Avenue between Madison Avenue and Curragh Downs Drive (Roadway Segment 10). To ensure that Hazel Avenue operates at an acceptable LOS between Curragh Downs Drive and Gold Country Boulevard, Hazel Avenue must be widened to six lanes. This improvement is part of the County adopted Hazel Avenue widening project.

Before project
build out.

Construction of
phase two of
the Hazel
Avenue
widening, from
Madison
Avenue to
Curragh Downs
Drive, is
expected to be
completed by
year 2013,
before the first
phase of the
Proposed
Project or
alternative is
complete. The
applicant shall
pay its
proportionate
share of funding
of
improvements
to the agency
responsible for
improvements,
based on a
program
established by
that agency to
reduce the
impacts to
Hazel Avenue
between
Madison
Avenue and
Curragh Downs
Drive
Sacramento
County Public
Works
Department
This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

(Sacramento
County
Roadway
Segment 10).
106
-60
3A.15-1l
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on the White Rock Road/Windfield Way Intersection (El Dorado County Intersection 3). To ensure that the White Rock Road/Windfield Way intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the intersection must be signalized and separate northbound left and right turn lanes must be striped. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the White Rock Road/Windfield Way intersection (El Dorado County Intersection 3).

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

El Dorado
County
Department of
Transportation
This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

106
-61
3A.15-1o
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Eastbound U.S. 50 as an alternative to improvements at the Folsom Boulevard/U.S. 50 Eastbound Ramps Intersection (Caltrans Intersection 4). Congestion on eastbound U.S. 50 is causing vehicles to use Folsom Boulevard as an alternate parallel route until they reach U.S. 50, where they must get back on the freeway due to the lack of a parallel route. It is preferred to alleviate the congestion on U.S. 50 than to upgrade the intersection at the end of this reliever route. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the Folsom Boulevard/U.S. 50 Eastbound Ramps intersection (Caltrans Intersection 4). To ensure that the Folsom Boulevard/U.S. 50 eastbound ramps intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, auxiliary lanes should be added to eastbound U.S. 50 from Hazel Avenue to east of Folsom Boulevard. This was recommended in the Traffic Operations Analysis Report for the U.S. 50 Auxiliary Lane Project.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department and
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation
This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

106
-62
3A.15-1p
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on the Grant Line Road/ State Route 16 Intersection (Caltrans Intersection 12). To ensure that the Grant Line Road/State Route 16 intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound and southbound approaches must be reconfigured to consist of one left-turn lane and one shared through/right-turn lane. Protected left-turn signal phasing must be provided on the northbound and southbound approaches. Improvements to the Grant Line Road/State Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation
and the City of
Rancho
This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

Route 16 intersection are contained within the County Development Fee Program, and are scheduled for Measure A funding.

Improvements to this intersection must be implemented by Caltrans, Sacramento County, and the City of Rancho Cordova.

The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the Grant Line Road/State Route 16 intersection (Caltrans Intersection 12). approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Cordova
Department of
Public Works
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.
106
-63
3A.15-1q
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Eastbound U.S. 50 between Zinfandel Drive and Sunrise Boulevard (Freeway Segment 1). To ensure that Eastbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS between Zinfandel Drive and Sunrise Boulevard, a bus-carpool (HOV) lane must be constructed. This improvement is currently planned as part of the Sacramento 50 Bus-Carpool Lane and Community Enhancements Project. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to Eastbound U.S. 50 between Zinfandel Drive and Sunrise Boulevard (Freeway Segment 1).

Before project
build out.

Construction of
the Sacramento
50 Bus-Carpool
Lane and
Community
Enhancements
Project is
expected to be
completed by
year 2013,
before the first
phase of the
Proposed
Project or
alternative is
complete.

Construction of
the Sacramento
50 Bus-Carpool
Lane and
Community
Enhancements
Project has
started since the
writing of the
Draft EIS/EIR.

Caltrans This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

106
-64
3A.15-1r
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Eastbound U.S. 50 between Hazel Avenue and Folsom Boulevard (Freeway Segment 3). To ensure that Eastbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS between Hazel Avenue and Folsom Boulevard, an auxiliary lane must be constructed.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department and
This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

This improvement was recommended in the Traffic Operations Analysis Report for the U.S. 50 Auxiliary Lane Project. This improvement is included in the proposed 50 Corridor Mobility Fee Program.

The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to Eastbound U.S. 50 between Hazel Avenue and Folsom Boulevard (Freeway Segment 3). be performed to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.
106
-65
3A.15-1s
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Eastbound U.S. 50 between Folsom Boulevard and Prairie City Road (Freeway Segment 4). To ensure that Eastbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS between Folsom Boulevard and Prairie City Road, an auxiliary lane must be constructed. This improvement was recommended in the Traffic Operations Analysis Report for the U.S. 50 Auxiliary Lane Project. This improvement is included in the proposed 50 Corridor Mobility Fee Program.

The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to Eastbound U.S. 50 between Folsom Boulevard and Prairie City Road (Freeway Segment 4).

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department and
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation
This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

106
-66
3A.15-1u
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Westbound U.S. 50 between Prairie City Road and Folsom Boulevard (Freeway Segment 16). To ensure that Westbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS between Prairie City Road and Folsom Boulevard, an auxiliary lane must be constructed. This improvement was recommended in the Traffic Operations Analysis Report for the U.S. 50 Auxiliary Lane Project. This improvement is included in the proposed 50 Corridor Mobility Fee Program.

The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to Westbound U.S. 50 between Prairie City Road and Folsom Boulevard (Freeway Segment 16).

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department and
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation
This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

106
-67
3A.15-1v
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Westbound U.S. 50 between Hazel Avenue and Sunrise Boulevard (Freeway Segment 18). To ensure that Westbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS between Hazel Avenue and Sunrise Boulevard, an auxiliary lane must be constructed.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
City of Rancho
Cordova
Department of
This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

This improvement was recommended in the Traffic Operations Analysis Report for the U.S. 50 Auxiliary Lane Project, and included in the proposed Rancho Cordova Parkway interchange project.

Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to Westbound U.S. 50 between Hazel Avenue and Sunrise Boulevard (Freeway Segment 18).
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Public Works
and Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision. 106
-68
3A.15-1w
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Eastbound/Folsom Boulevard Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 4). To ensure that Eastbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS at the Folsom Boulevard merge, an auxiliary lane from the Folsom Boulevard merge to the Prairie City Road diverge must be constructed. This improvement was recommended in the Traffic Operations Analysis Report for the U.S. 50 Auxiliary Lane Project. This improvement is included in the proposed 50 Corridor Mobility Fee Program. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Eastbound/Folsom Boulevard Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 4).

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department and
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation
This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

106
-69
3A.15-1x
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Eastbound/Prairie City Road Diverge (Freeway Diverge 5). To ensure that Eastbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS at the Prairie City Road off-ramp diverge, an auxiliary lane from the Folsom Boulevard merge must be constructed. This improvement was recommended in the Traffic Operations Analysis Report for the U.S. 50 Auxiliary Lane Project. This auxiliary lane improvement is included in the proposed 50 Corridor Mobility Fee Program. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Eastbound/Prairie City Road diverge (Freeway Diverge 5).

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department and
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation
This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

improvement
should be built.
106
-70
3A.15-1y
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Eastbound/Prairie City Road Direct Merge (Freeway Merge 6). To ensure that Eastbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS at the Prairie City Road onramp direct merge, an auxiliary lane to the East Bidwell Street – Scott Road diverge must be constructed. This auxiliary lane improvement is included in the proposed 50 Corridor Mobility Fee Program. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Eastbound/Prairie City Road direct merge (Freeway Merge 6).

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

106
-71
3A.15-1z
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Eastbound/Prairie City Road Flyover On-Ramp to Oak Avenue Parkway Off-Ramp Weave (Freeway Weave 8). To ensure that Eastbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS at the Prairie City Road flyover on-ramp to Oak Avenue Parkway off-ramp weave, an improvement acceptable to Caltrans should be implemented to eliminate the unacceptable weaving conditions. Such an improvement may involve a “braided ramp”.

The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Eastbound / Prairie City Road flyover on-ramp to Oak Avenue Parkway off-ramp weave (Freeway Weave 8).

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

106
-72
3A.15-1aa
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Eastbound/Oak Avenue Parkway Loop Merge (Freeway Merge 9). To ensure that Eastbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS at the Oak Avenue Parkway loop merge, an auxiliary lane to the East Bidwell Street – Scott Road diverge must be constructed. This auxiliary lane improvement is included in the proposed 50 Corridor Mobility Fee Program. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Eastbound/ Oak Avenue Parkway loop merge (Freeway Merge 9).

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.
106
-73
3A.15-1dd
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Westbound/Empire Ranch Road Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 23). To ensure that Westbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound Empire Ranch Road loop on ramp should start the westbound auxiliary lane that ends at the East Bidwell Street – Scott Road off ramp. The slip on ramp from southbound Empire Ranch Road would merge into this extended auxiliary lane. Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Westbound/Empire Ranch Road loop ramp merge (Freeway Merge 23).

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

106
-74
3A.15-1ee
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Westbound/Oak Avenue Parkway Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 29). To ensure that Westbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound Oak Avenue Parkway loop on ramp should start the westbound auxiliary lane that ends at the Prairie City Road off ramp. The slip on ramp from southbound Oak Avenue Parkway would merge into this extended auxiliary lane. Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Westbound/Oak Avenue Parkway loop ramp merge (Freeway Merge 29).

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

106
-75
3A.15-1ff
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Westbound/Prairie City Road Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 32). To ensure that Westbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS at the Prairie City Road loop ramp merge, an auxiliary lane to the Folsom Boulevard off Before project
build out. A
phasing
City of Folsom
Community
Development
This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

ramp diverge must be constructed. This auxiliary lane improvement is included in the proposed 50 Corridor Mobility Fee Program. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Westbound/Prairie City Road Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 32). analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Department and
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision. 106
-76
3A.15-1gg
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Westbound/Prairie City Road Direct Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 33). To ensure that Westbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS at the Prairie City Road direct ramp merge, an auxiliary lane to the Folsom Boulevard off ramp diverge must be constructed. This auxiliary lane improvement is included in the proposed 50 Corridor Mobility Fee Program. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Westbound/Prairie City Road direct ramp merge (Freeway Merge 33).

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department and
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation
This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

106
-77
3A.15-1hh
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Eastbound/Folsom Boulevard Diverge (Freeway Diverge 34). To ensure that Westbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS at the Folsom Boulevard Diverge, an auxiliary lane from the Prairie City Road loop ramp merge must be constructed. Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. This auxiliary lane improvement is included in the proposed 50 Corridor Mobility Fee Program. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Eastbound / Folsom Boulevard diverge (Freeway Diverge 34).

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department and
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation
This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

improvement
should be built.
106
-78
3A.15-1ii
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Westbound/Hazel Avenue Direct Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 38). To ensure that Westbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS at the Hazel Avenue direct ramp merge, an auxiliary lane to the Sunrise Boulevard off ramp diverge must be constructed. This auxiliary lane improvement is included in the proposed 50 Corridor Mobility Fee Program. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Westbound/Hazel Avenue direct ramp merge (Freeway Merge 38).

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation
and City of
Rancho
Cordova
Department of
Public Works
This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

106
-79
3A.15-2a
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Develop Commercial Support Services and Mixed-use Development Concurrent with Housing Development, and Develop and Provide Options for Alternative Transportation Modes. The project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application including commercial or mixed-use development along with residential uses shall develop commercial and mixed-use development concurrent with housing development, to the extent feasible in light of market realities and other considerations, to internalize vehicle trips.

Pedestrian and bicycle facilities shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Public Works Department. To further minimize impacts from the increased demand on area roadways and intersections, the project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application involving schools or commercial centers shall develop and implement safe and secure bicycle parking to promote alternative transportation uses and reduce the volume of single-occupancy vehicles using area roadways and intersections. The project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application shall participate in capital improvements and operating funds for transit service to increase the percent of travel by transit. The project’s fair-share participation and the associated timing of the improvements and service shall be identified in the project conditions of approval and/or the project’s development agreement. Improvements and service shall be coordinated, as necessary, with Folsom Stage Lines and Sacramento RT.

Before approval
of improvement
plans for all
project phases
any particular
discretionary
development
application that
includes
residential and
commercial or
mixed-use
development.

As a condition
of project
approval and/or
as a condition
of the
development
agreement for
all project
phases.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

106
-80
3A.15-2b
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Participate in the City’s Transportation System Management Fee Program. The project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application shall pay an appropriate amount into the City’s existing Transportation System Management Fee Program to reduce the number of single-occupant automobile travel on area roadways and intersections.

Concurrent with
construction for
all project
phases.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

106
-81
3A.15-2c
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)

Participate with the 50 Corridor Transportation Management Association. The project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application shall join and participate with the 50 Corridor Transportation Management Association to reduce the number of single-occupant automobile travel on area roadways and intersections.

Concurrent with
construction for
all project
phases.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

106
-82
3A.15-3
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Pay Full Cost of Identified Improvements that Are Not Funded by the City’s Fee Program. In accordance with Measure W, the project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application shall provide fair-share contributions to the City’s transportation impact fee program to fully fund improvements only required because of the Specific Plan.

As a condition
of project
approval and/or
as a condition
of the
development
agreement for
all project
phases.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

106
-83
3A.15-4a
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the Construction of Improvements to the Sibley Street/Blue Ravine Road Intersection (Folsom Intersection 2). To ensure that the Sibley Street/Blue Ravine Road intersection operates at a LOS D with less than the Cumulative No Project delay, the northbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of two left-turn lane, two through lanes, and one dedicated right-turn lane. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the Sibley Street/Blue Ravine Road intersection (Folsom Intersection 2).

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

106
-84
3A.15-4b
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the Construction of Improvements to the Oak Avenue Parkway/East Bidwell Street Intersection (Folsom Intersection 6). To ensure that the Oak Avenue Parkway/East Bidwell Street intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the eastbound (East Bidwell Street) approach must be reconfigured to consist of two left-turn lanes, four through lanes and a right-turn lane, and the westbound (East Bidwell Street) approach must be reconfigured to consist of two left turn lanes, four through lanes, and a right-turn lane. It is against the City of Folsom policy to have eight lane roads because of the impacts to non motorized traffic and adjacent development; therefore, this improvement is infeasible.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

106
-85
3A.15-4c
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)

The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the Construction of Improvements to the East Bidwell Street/College Street Intersection (Folsom Intersection 7). To ensure that the East Bidwell Street/College Street intersection operates at acceptable LOS C or better, the westbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of one left-turn lane, one left-through lane, and two dedicated right-turn lanes. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the East Bidwell Street/Nesmith Court intersection (Folsom Intersection 7).

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

106
-86
3A.15-4d
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the Construction of Improvements to the East Bidwell Street/Iron Point Road Intersection (Folsom Intersection 21). To ensure that the East Bidwell Street /Iron Point Road intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of two left-turn lanes, four through lanes and a right-turn lane, and the southbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of two left-turn lanes, four through lanes and a right-turn lane. It is against the City of Folsom policy to have eight lane roads because of the impacts to non motorized traffic and adjacent development; therefore, this improvement is infeasible.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

project phase
the
improvement
should be built.
106
-87
3A.15-4e
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the Construction of Improvements to the Serpa Way/ Iron Point Road Intersection (Folsom Intersection 23). To improve LOS at the Serpa Way/ Iron Point Road intersection, the northbound approaches must be restriped to consist of one left-turn lane, one shared left-through lanes, and one right-turn lane. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the Serpa Way/Iron Point Road Intersection (Folsom Intersection 23).

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

106
-88
3A.15-4f
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the Construction of Improvements to the Empire Ranch Road/Iron Point Road Intersection (Folsom Intersection 24). To ensure that the Empire Ranch Road / Iron Point Road intersection operates at a LOS D or better, all of the following improvements are required:

The eastbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of one left-turn lane, two through lanes, and a right- turn lane. The westbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of two left-turn lanes, one through lane, and a through-right lane. The northbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of two left-turn lanes, three through lanes, and a right-turn lane. The southbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of two left-turn lanes, three through lanes, and a right-turn lane. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the Empire Ranch Road / Iron Point Road Intersection Before project build out. A phasing analysis should be performed prior to approval of the first subdivision map to determine during which project phase the improvement should be built. (Folsom Intersection 24).

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

106
-89
3A.15-4g
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
The Applicant Shall Fund and Construct Improvements to the Oak Avenue Parkway/Easton Valley Parkway Intersection (Folsom Intersection 33). To ensure that the Oak Avenue Parkway/Easton Valley Parkway intersection operates at an acceptable LOS the southbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of two left-turn lanes, two through lanes, and two right-turn lanes. The applicant shall fund and construct these improvements.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.
106
-90
3A.15-4i
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on the Grant Line Road/White Rock Road Intersection (Sacramento County Intersection 3). To ensure that the Grant Line Road/White Rock Road intersection operates at an acceptable LOS E or better this intersection should be replaced by some type of grade separated intersection or interchange. Improvements to this intersection are identified in the Sacramento County’s Proposed General Plan. Implementation of these improvements would assist in reducing traffic impacts on this intersection by providing acceptable operation. Intersection improvements must be implemented by Sacramento County. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the Grant Line Road/White Rock Road Intersection (Sacramento County Intersection 3).

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

106
-91
3A.15-4j
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Grant Line Road between White Rock Road and Kiefer Boulevard (Sacramento County Roadway Segments 5-7). To improve operation on Grant Line Road between White Rock Road and Kiefer Boulevard, this roadway segment must be widened to six lanes. This improvement is proposed in the Sacramento County and the City of Rancho Cordova General Plans; however, it is not in the 2035 MTP. Improvements to this roadway segment must be implemented by Sacramento County and the City of Rancho Cordova. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to Grant Line Road between White Rock Road and Kiefer Boulevard (Sacramento County Roadway Segments 5-7). The identified improvement would more than offset the impacts specifically related to the Folsom South of U.S. 50 project on this roadway segment.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

106
-92
3A.15-4k
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Grant Line Road between Kiefer Boulevard and Jackson Highway (Sacramento County Roadway Segment 8). To improve operation on Grant Line Road between Kiefer Boulevard Jackson Highway, this roadway segment could be widened to six lanes. This improvement is proposed in the Sacramento County and the City of Rancho Cordova General Plans; however, it is not in the 2035 MTP. Improvements to this roadway segment must be implemented by Sacramento County and the City of Rancho Cordova. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to Grant Line Road between Kiefer Boulevard and Jackson Highway (Sacramento County Roadway Segment 8). The identified improvement would more than offset the impacts specifically related to the Folsom South of U.S. 50 project on this roadway segment.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

106
-93
3A.15-4l
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Hazel Avenue between Curragh Downs Drive and U.S. 50 Westbound Ramps (Sacramento County Roadway Segments 12-13).

To improve operation on Hazel Avenue between Curragh Downs Drive and the U.S. 50 westbound ramps, this roadway segment could be widened to eight lanes. This improvement is inconsistent with Sacramento County’s general plan because the county’s policy requires a maximum roadway cross section of six lanes.

Analysis shown later indicates that improvements at the impacted intersection in this segment can be mitigated (see Mitigation Measure 3A.15-4q). Improvements to impacted intersections on this segment will improve operations on this roadway segment and, therefore; mitigate this segment impact. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to Hazel Avenue between Curragh Downs Drive and U.S. 50 Westbound Ramps (Sacramento County Roadway Segments 12-13).

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

106
-94
3A.15-4m
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on White Rock Road between Grant Line Road and Prairie City Road (Sacramento County Roadway Segment 22). To improve operation on White Rock Road between Grant Line Road and Prairie City Road, this roadway segment must be widened to six lanes. This improvement is included in the 2035 MTP but is not included in the Sacramento County General Plan. Improvements to this roadway segment must be implemented by Sacramento County. The identified improvement would more than offset the impacts specifically related to the Folsom South of U.S. 50 project on this roadway segment. However, because of other development in the region that would substantially increase traffic levels, this roadway segment would continue to operate at an unacceptable LOS F even with the capacity improvements identified to mitigate Folsom South of U.S. 50 impacts. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to White Rock Road between Grant Line Road and Prairie City Road (Sacramento County Roadway Segment 22). project phase
the
improvement
should be built.
106
-95
3A.15-4n
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on White Rock Road between Empire Ranch Road and Carson Crossing Road (Sacramento County Roadway Segment 28). To improve operation on White Rock Road between Empire Ranch Road and Carson Crossing Road, this roadway segment must be widened to six lanes. Improvements to this roadway segment must be implemented by Sacramento County. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to White Rock Road between Empire Ranch Road and Carson Crossing Road (Sacramento County Roadway Segment 28).

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

106
-96
3A.15-4o
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on the White Rock Road/Carson Crossing Road Intersection (El Dorado County 1). To ensure that the White Rock Road/Carson Crossing Road intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the eastbound right turn lane must be converted into a separate free right turn lane, or double right. Improvements to this intersection must be implemented by El Dorado County. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the White Rock Road/Carson Crossing Road Intersection (El Dorado County 1).

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

106
-97
3A.15-4p
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on the Hazel Avenue/U.S. 50 Westbound Ramps Intersection (Caltrans Intersection 1). To ensure that the Hazel Avenue/U.S. 50 westbound ramps intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the westbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of one dedicated left turn lane, one shared left through lane and three dedicated right-turn lanes.

Improvements to this intersection must be implemented by Caltrans and Sacramento County. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the Hazel Avenue/U.S. 50 Westbound Ramps Intersection (Caltrans Intersection 1).
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.
106
-98
3A.15-4q
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Eastbound US 50 between Zinfandel Drive and Sunrise Boulevard (Freeway Segment 1). To ensure that Eastbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS between Zinfandel Drive and Sunrise Boulevard, an additional eastbound lane could be constructed. This improvement is not consistent with the Concept Facility in Caltrans State Route 50 Corridor System Management Plan; therefore, it is not likely to be implemented by Caltrans by 2030.

Construction of the Capitol South East Connector, including widening White Rock Road and Grant Line Road to six lanes with limited access, could divert some traffic from U.S. 50 and partially mitigate the project’s impact. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to Eastbound U.S. 50 between Zinfandel Drive and Sunrise Boulevard (Freeway Segment 1).

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

106
-99
3A.15-4r
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Eastbound US 50 between Rancho Cordova Parkway and Hazel Avenue (Freeway Segment 3). To ensure that Eastbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS between Rancho Cordova Parkway and Hazel Avenue, an additional eastbound lane could be constructed. This improvement is not consistent with the Concept Facility in Caltrans State Route 50 Corridor System Management Plan; therefore, it is not likely to be implemented by Caltrans by 2030. Construction of the Capitol South East Connector, including widening White Rock Road and Grant Line Road to six lanes with limited access, could divert some traffic off of U.S. 50 and partially mitigate the project’s impact. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to Eastbound U.S. 50 between Rancho Cordova Parkway and Hazel Avenue (Freeway Segment 3).

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

106
-
100
3A.15-4s
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Eastbound US 50 between Folsom Boulevard and Prairie City Road (Freeway Segment 5). To ensure that Eastbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS between Folsom Boulevard and Prairie City Road, the eastbound auxiliary lane should be converted to a mixed flow lane that extends to and drops at the Oak Avenue Parkway off ramp (see mitigation measure 3A.15-4t). Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. This improvement is not consistent with the Concept Facility in Caltrans State Route 50 Corridor System Management Plan; therefore, it is not likely to be implemented by Caltrans by 2030. Construction of the Capitol South East Connector, including widening White Rock Road and Grant Line Road to six lanes with limited access, could divert some traffic off of U.S. 50 and partially mitigate the project’s impact. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to Eastbound U.S. 50 between Folsom Boulevard and Prairie City Road (Freeway Segment 5).

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

106
-
101
3A.15-4t
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Eastbound US 50 between Prairie City Road and Oak Avenue Parkway (Freeway Segment 6). To ensure that Eastbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS between Prairie City Road and Oak Avenue Parkway, the northbound Prairie City Road slip on ramp should merge with the eastbound auxiliary lane that extends to and drops at the Oak Avenue Parkway off ramp (see Mitigation Measures 3A.15-4u, v and w), and the southbound Prairie City Road flyover on ramp should be braided over the Oak Avenue Parkway off ramp and start an extended full auxiliary lane to the East Bidwell Street – Scott Road off ramp. Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to Eastbound U.S. 50 between Prairie City Road and Oak Avenue Parkway (Freeway Segment 6).

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

106
-
102
3A.15-4u
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on the U.S. 50 Eastbound / Prairie City Road Slip Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 6). To ensure that Eastbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound Prairie City Road slip on ramp should start the eastbound auxiliary lane that extends to and drops at the Oak Avenue Parkway off ramp (see mitigation measure 3A.15-4u, w and x), and the southbound Prairie City Road flyover on ramp should be braided over the Oak Avenue Parkway off ramp and start an extended full auxiliary lane to the East Bidwell Street – Scott Road off ramp. Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Eastbound / Prairie City Road slip ramp merge (Freeway Merge 6).

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

project phase
the
improvement
should be built.
142
-
103
3A.15-4v
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on the U.S. 50 Eastbound / Prairie City Road Flyover On Ramp to Oak Avenue Parkway Off Ramp Weave (Freeway Weave 7).

To ensure that Eastbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound Prairie City Road slip on ramp should start the eastbound auxiliary lane that extends to and drops at the Oak Avenue Parkway off ramp (see mitigation measure 3A.15-4u, v and x), and the southbound Prairie City Road flyover on ramp should be braided over the Oak Avenue Parkway off ramp and start an extended full auxiliary lane to the East Bidwell Street – Scott Road off ramp. Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Eastbound / Prairie City Road Flyover On Ramp to Oak Avenue Parkway Off Ramp Weave (Freeway Weave 7).

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

106
-
104
3A.15-4w
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Eastbound / Oak Avenue Parkway Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 8). To ensure that Eastbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS, the southbound Oak Avenue Parkway loop on ramp should merge with the eastbound auxiliary lane that starts at the southbound Prairie City Road braided flyover on ramp and ends at the East Bidwell Street – Scott Road off ramp (see mitigation measure 3A.15-4u, v and w). Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to U.S. 50 Eastbound / Oak Avenue Parkway Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 8).

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

106
-
105
3A.15-4x
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Westbound / Empire Ranch Road Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 27). To ensure that Westbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound Empire Ranch Road loop on ramp should start the westbound auxiliary lane that ends at the East Bidwell Street – Scott Road off ramp. The slip on ramp from southbound Empire Ranch Road slip ramp would merge into this extended auxiliary lane. Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Westbound / Empire Ranch Road loop ramp merge (Freeway Merge 27).
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.
106
-
106
3A.15-4y
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Westbound / Prairie City Road Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 35). To ensure that Westbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound Prairie City Road loop on ramp should start the westbound auxiliary lane that continues beyond the Folsom Boulevard off ramp. The slip on ramp from southbound Prairie City Road slip ramp would merge into this extended auxiliary lane. Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Westbound / Prairie City Road Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 35).

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

106
-
107

4.17-1
(Addendum)
East Bidwell Street/Regency Parkway (Driveway #6). Prior to buildout of the Toll Brothers Site, the project applicant shall construct the intersection as shown in Figure 4-2 of the Addendum:
 Northbound: one thru lane and one left turn lane in a 150-foot pocket with 60-foot taper;  Southbound: one thru lane and one right turn lane in a 150-foot pocket with 60-foot taper;  Westbound: one shared lane, plus a 300-foot northbound acceleration lane on East Bidwell Street to receive left-turns from Regency Parkway (a second northbound lane on East Bidwell Street starting from Regency Parkway is equivalent to the 300-foot acceleration lane); and  Control: side-street-stop-control;
Note that unsignalized left turns to East Bidwell Street are against City policy. The northbound acceleration lane on East Bidwell Street is an interim configuration until the intersection warrants signalization.

Signalization will be triggered as part of the entitlement process on neighboring parcels. A future signal at this location is included in Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan, and plan area fees paid by the Project contribute towards its construction in the future.

Prior to
issuance of
phase 3
building
permits.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
This condition will be satisfied prior to
issuance of the 546th building permit in
the Phase 2 portion of the Toll Brothers
at Folsom Ranch Regency project in
accordance with previous conditions of
approval. The Phase 1 portion of the
Regency project consists of 545 dwelling
units, The VTSM for the Phase 2 portion
of the Regency project has not yet been
approved by the City Council.

03/10/2026 Item No.5.

Resolution No. 10400

106
-
108

4.17-2
(Addendum)
East Bidwell Street/White Rock Road. Prior to buildout of the Toll Brothers Site, the project applicant shall implement either (A) or (B) below:
(A) The Capital Southeast Connector Joint Powers Authority project has programmed to relocate and signalize the East Bidwell Street/White Rock Road intersection as shown in the October 2017 geometric conceptual drawing, or equivalent improvements (i.e., three southbound approach lanes, four eastbound approach lanes, and three westbound approach lanes). Figure 4-3 of the Addendum provides a conceptual intersection layout for this mitigation. Under this scenario, fair share is defined as the project’s responsibility to the Sacramento County Transportation Development Fee. The project applicant is required to pay the Sacramento County Transportation Development Fee. Option A can be considered to be implemented once the JPA has let contracts for construction of the new intersection. This will insure that the mitigation is constructed before project traffic adds five or more seconds of delay to the intersection.
(B) Signalize the existing East Bidwell Street/White Rock Road intersection with the existing geometry.

Figure 4-4 of the Addendum provides a conceptual intersection layout for this mitigation.

Prior to
issuance of
phase 1
building
permits.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The Capital Southeast Connector -JPA
has executed a construction contract with
Goodfellow Brothers, Inc. to construct
the Capital Southeast Connector from
Prairie City Road to East Bidwell Street.

The construction contract was executed
in December of 2020. Grading and
construction commenced in April 2021.

The project will include the relocation
and signalization of the existing White
Rock Road/East Bidwell Street
intersection. The owner/applicant will
pay the Sacramento County
Transportation Development Fee prior to
issuance of all building permits in the
subdivision.

106
-
109

4.17-3
(Addendum)
East Bidwell Street/Mangini Parkway. Prior to buildout of the Toll Brothers Site, the project applicant shall signalize the intersection with the following geometry (Figure 4-5 of the Addendum):
 Northbound: One left-turn lane in a 200-foot pocket with a 60-foot taper, two thru lanes, and one right- turn lane in a 150-foot pocket with a 60-foot taper (the second thru lane shall be developed 300 feet south of the intersection);
 Southbound: One left-turn lane in a 200-foot pocket with a 60-foot taper, one thru lane, and one right- turn lane in a 150-foot pocket with a 60-foot taper;
 Eastbound and westbound: One left-turn lane in a 200-foot pocket with a 60-foot taper, one thru lane, and one right-turn lane in a 200-foot pocket with a 60-foot taper.

Note that northbound East Bidwell street will remain at two lanes from Mangini Parkway to US 50.

Signalize the
intersection and
conduct all
geometric
improvements,
with the
exception of the
second
northbound thru
lane prior to
issuance of
phase 1
building
permits.

Construct the
second
northbound thru
lane prior to
issuance of
phase 2
building
permits.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
The Community Development
Department has reviewed and approved
the improvement plans for the
construction of these required
improvements including the plans for the
modification to the existing traffic signal
at the intersection of East Bidwell Street
and Mangini Parkway. These
improvements are currently under
construction.

106
-
110

4.17-4
(Addendum)
East Bidwell Street/Savannah Parkway. Prior to buildout of the Toll Brothers site, the project applicant shall reconstruct the intersection with the following geometry (Figure 4-6 of the Addendum):

Construct all
geometric
improvements
City of Folsom
Community
The required improvements in this
condition have been completed and
accepted by the City. These