Fontana City Council
April 25, 2023

12. Amplified music may be permitted but the sound emitted from the mechanism shall not be audible outside the walls of the business establishment so as to disturb the peace, pursuant to Fontana City Code Section No. 16-19, Section No. 18-062 and Section No. 18-063.

13. The incidental live entertainment for the banquet hall shall not be audible outside the walls of the business establishment so as to disturb the peace, pursuant to Fontana City Code Section No. 16-19, Section No. 18-062 and Section No. 18-063.

14. The business owner or management may allow incidental live entertainment to provide music for the banquet hall between the hours of 7:00 pm and 12:00 am on Fridays and Saturdays and from 7:00 pm and 10:00 pm on Sundays. The incidental live entertainment may be a solo artist, duo, trio, or group to provide music for the banquet hall. The incidental live entertainment shall not be used as a promotional event but shall be intended solely for the enjoyment of guests for the banquet hall.

15. At no time shall the premises operate as a nightclub, or dance hall.

16. There shall be no designated dance floor area provided on the premises.

17. At not time shall an entrance fee be charged to patrons entering the establishment for any reason, or for any entry into any area within the establishment to view any live performance, televised or promotional events.

18. No tint of any kind is permitted on the windows or doors to the establishment.

Security laminate film to discourage vandalism (graffiti) is acceptable on any glass surface of the exterior but shall be clear in color (no tint or coloration).

19. Window signage shall not exceed 25% of each window, signage shall not block visibility into the interior of the board room or banquet hall. Any window signage shall be located within the upper or lower portions of each window.

20. In the event security problems occur and at the request of the Police Department, the business owner/licensee or management, at his or her own expense, shall provide a California licensed, uniformed security guard(s) on the premises, during such hours as requested and directed by the Police Department. All uniformed security guards shall comply with the Fontana Municipal Code Section No. 22-62 and shall be registered with the State of California’s Bureau of Security and Investigative Services as a security guard prior to employment within the City of Fontana.

21. The operation of the business shall not violate any federal, state, or local laws, ordinances, or conditions of approval within this minor use permit. Failure to comply with these requirements shall constitute grounds for revocation of the minor use permit.

22. The approved set of Conditions of Approval shall be posted at all times at a visible located within the facility and shall remain legible at all times.

23. Graffiti abatement by the business owner shall be immediate and ongoing on the premises, but in no event shall graffiti be allowed unabated on the premises for more than 48 hours. Abatement shall take the form of removal or shall be covered/painted over with a color reasonably matching the color of the existing building, structure, or other surface being abated. Additionally, the business owner shall notify the City within 24 hours of any graffiti elsewhere on the property not under the business 113 224
Resolution No. PC 2023-_____

owner control so that it may be abated by the property owner and/or the City’s Graffiti Enforcement Team.

24. All signs shall be reviewed under a separate Design Review Sign Application.

25. On a regular and reasonable basis, litter shall be removed daily from the surrounding area.

PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY

26. The current Development fees must be paid prior to issuance of building/construction permits.

POLICE DEPARTMENT:

27. This is a high graffiti area of the city. To discourage graffiti, apply an anti-graffiti coating on all block walls.

28. Adhere to the City standard of one-foot candle minimum for all entrances, exits, pedestrian paths, parking lots, and activity areas. All areas shall be illuminated during all hours of darkness and all luminaries utilized shall be vandal-resistant fixtures. The type of lighting shall be fluorescent, white L.E.D.s or metal halide.

Provide a photometric layout under separate exhibit to ensure the minimum light standard is met.

29. Adhere to the Standard Building Security Specifications of the Fontana Police Department.

END OF CONDITIONS
114 225
Resolution No. PC 2023-_____

EXHIBIT “E”

CITY OF FONTANA

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
PROJECT: Master Case No. 20-083 DATE: January 17, 2023
Design Review No. 20-031 and Variance No. 22-001
Shopping Center
LOCATION: The project site is located on the northwest corner of South Highland Avenue and Citrus Avenue (APNs: 0228-301-01 through -08, 0228-310- 20, -21, -22, -23, 0228-310-33 through -49, -51, and 52).

PLANNING DEPARTMENT:

1. All Conditions of Approval contained herein shall be incorporated into all applicable final construction plans and a copy of these conditions, signed by the property owner or legal representative, shall be placed on the first sheet of the final building plans prior to issuance of any building permits.

2. This Design Review shall become null and void two (2) years from the date of approval, unless the appropriate permits have been obtained and construction, defined as permit obtainment, commencement of construction of the primary building on site, and successful completion of the first Building and Safety Division inspection, has commenced within this period.

3. The rights and privileges granted by this project shall not become effective, nor shall the Applicant commence the use for which this project is granted, until both of the following have occurred:
a. All of the improvements, construction, alteration and other work set forth in this project have been completed and have been accepted by the City, as evidenced by the City’s issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or other document evidencing the City’s final inspection and acceptance of the work; and
b. All other Conditions of Approval imposed by this project have been fulfilled. 115 226
Resolution No. PC 2023-_____

4. Prior to the construction of any modifications, all structural and aesthetic changes to the project design must be requested and approved in writing by the Director of Planning or his/her designee.

5. This project will comply with all applicable provisions, regulations and development standards of the City of Fontana Municipal Code.

6. The occupants of this facility shall comply with applicable provisions of local, state and federal laws and regulations with respect to noise, vibration, smoke, odors, fire and explosive hazards, including, but not limited to the City’s adopted Hazardous Materials Management Plan and Industrial Wastewater/Discharge requirements.

7. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City of Fontana or its agents, officers, attorneys and employees from any and all actual or alleged claims, actions or proceedings against the City of Fontana or its agents, officers, attorneys or employees to attack, set aside, void, annul or seek monetary damages arising out of any challenge to the applicant’s proposed project or to any approvals of the Planning Commission and/or City Council concerning this project, including but not limited to actions challenging CEQA actions, permits, variances, plot plans, design plans, maps, licenses, and amendments. The City of Fontana shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding and the City of Fontana shall cooperate in the defense.

In the event of any such third party action or proceeding, the City shall have the right to retain legal counsel. The applicant shall be responsible and reimburse the City for such legal fees and costs, in their entirety, including actual attorneys’ fees, which may be incurred by the City in defense of such action or proceeding. This indemnification shall also include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded against the City, if any, and cost of suit, attorneys’ fees, and other costs, liabilities and expenses incurred in connection with such claim, action, or proceeding whether incurred by applicant, the City and/or any parties bringing such forth.

Except as required under applicable State and Federal law, the City of Fontana and the applicant acknowledge that the City would not have approved this project if the City were to be liable to applicant in damages under or with respect to all or any part of this application or this condition of approval. Accordingly, applicant shall not sue the City for damages or monetary relief for any matter arising from or related to this condition of approval. Applicant’s sole and exclusive remedy shall be limited to declaratory/injunctive relief, mandate, and/or specific performance.

8. In the event that one or more of the Conditions of Approval for this project needs to be amended and/or deleted due to health, safety or welfare concerns, the City Manager is authorized to approve or conditionally approve such amendment/deletion, provided that City manager shall bring such proposed amendment/deletion to the City Council at the next available meeting for City Council ratification, but in no event later than sixty (60) days following the City 116 227
Resolution No. PC 2023-_____

Manger’s decision. The noticing of such City Council meeting for possible ratification shall be pursuant to Sections 30-30 and 30-31 of the Municipal Code.

9. Exterior lighting compatible with the design of the building shall be provided for the parking lot. The lighting shall be directed and shielded so as to illuminate only the parking area and to avoid glare impacts on adjacent properties.

10. All roof-mounted equipment and ground mounted equipment shall be screened from view from adjacent properties and streets with colors and materials that are compatible with the architecture of the building(s).

11. Any foam treatment used for architecture treatments and/or projections located on the first floor shall be covered with concrete or similar durable material a minimum of ¼ inch thick, or as determined by the Director of Planning.

12. The applicant shall post a publicly visible sign on the project site with the telephone number and 24-hour point of contact for dust, noise, and construction complaints.

The 24-hour point of contact shall be available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week and have authority to commit additional assets to control dust, or respond to construction complaints after hours, on weekends and on holidays. Construction shall be limited to 7:00am to 6:00pm on weekdays, 8:00am to 5:00pm on Saturdays, and no construction on Sundays and Holidays.

13. The applicant shall fence off any future undeveloped pad area with a four (4) foot high white vinyl fence and hydroseed the undeveloped pad area.

14. Bicycle parking racks or secured bicycle lockers shall be provided for this development. Bicycle racks or lockers shall be provided at a rate of one bicycle parking space per 20 automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a two-bike rack.

15. All future monument signs shall be reviewed under a separate Design Review Sign application.

PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A GRADING PERMIT:

16. The applicant/developer shall comply with the mitigation measures identified in the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.

17. The applicant shall have fully provided, constructed, or otherwise meet all Planning Department’s requirements per approved plans, and shall have addressed all punch list items to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning.

18. All Conditions of Approval contained herein shall be incorporated into all applicable final construction plans and a copy of these conditions, signed by the property owner or legal representative, shall be placed on a sheet in the final building or grading plans prior to issuance of any building or grading permits. 117 228
Resolution No. PC 2023-_____

19. A Planning Department final inspection fee shall be paid prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for Industrial and Commercial Development.

20. Applicant shall pay all applicable service fees pursuant to the City of Fontana Municipal Code.

21. All architecture treatments and /or projections located on any elevation of any building shall be of durable non-foam e.g. (extrusive polystyrene) material; the use of foam for additional detailing is permitted above the first 14 feet in height on the elevations.

BUILDING & SAFETY DEPARTMENT:

22. Shall comply with the latest adopted edition of the following codes as applicable:

A. California Building Code
B. California Electrical Code
C. California Mechanical Code
D. California Plumbing Code
E. California Energy Code
F. California Fire Code
G. California Green Building Standards Code

23. Automatic fire suppression systems shall be installed in all new construction per Article II, Chapter 11 of the Code of the City of Fontana. Design and type of system shall be based upon the requirements of the Building Code, Fire Code and the requirements of the Fontana Fire Prevention District.

24. The requirements of the Air Quality Management District shall be satisfied prior to the issuance of any permit if hazardous materials are stored and/or used.

25. Any temporary building, trailer, commercial coach, etc. installed and/or used in connection with a construction project shall comply with City Code.

26. All perimeter/boundary walls shall be designed and constructed so that the outer/exterior face of the wall is as close as possible to the lot line. In any case, the outer/exterior face of the wall shall be within two (2) inches of the lot line.

Distances greater than two (2) inches may be approved prior to construction by the Building Official on a case by case basis for extenuating circumstances.

27. The Parcel map shall record prior to the issuance of any permits.

28. Grading Requirements:

A. Grading plans shall be submitted to and approved by Building & Safety.

The grading plans shall indicate all site improvements and shall indicate complete drainage paths of all drainage water run-offs.

B. All drainage water shall drain via approved methods to an approved location, such as a public street, a public drainage system, etc.

C. Drainage water shall not cross over a public sidewalk. Drainage water 118 229
Resolution No. PC 2023-_____

may, however, cross under a sidewalk if an approved drainage structure is used.

D. A recorded drainage acceptance agreement is required from adjoining property(s) receiving flows from this property.

E. No water course or natural drainage shall be obstructed.

F. Minimum slope or grade for ALL drainage structures shall be one half (0.50) percent for concrete and one (1.0) percent for all other, or as otherwise approved by the Building Official.

G. Drainage water shall not pass from an ‘improved’ type of drainage structure to an ‘unimproved’ type of drainage structure (e.g., concrete swale to a dirt swale) unless otherwise approved by the Building Official.

H. A complete hydrology study using the latest edition of the San Bernardino County Flood Control Hydrology Manual, and complete hydraulic calculations justifying the size, slope, capacity, etc. of any and all drainage structures being utilized, shall be submitted to and approved by Building & Safety.

The on-site drainage system shall, as a minimum, be designed to handle the run-off generated by a ten (10) year storm. Check for flooding of all on-site structures (buildings) and all adjacent properties during a hundred (100) year storm.

I. The grading plans shall, as a minimum, contain sections at all lot lines and/or permit boundary lines. These sections shall clearly indicate:

1. The relationship between the proposed finished on-site grade elevations and the existing adjacent property grade elevations (Indicate any additional drainage water that may come from an adjacent property.); and

2. The ground cover/finished surface material being proposed (e.g., type of pavement, plant material, etc.); and

3. All proposed drainage structures; and

4. Any proposed and/or required walls or fencing.

28. All signs shall be Underwriters Laboratories approved or equal.

29. All exterior lighting shall be oriented, directed, and/or shielded as much as possible so that direct illumination does not infringe onto adjoining properties.

PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING/CONSTRUCTION PERMITS

30. The following items (as applicable) shall be completed and/or submitted to Building & Safety prior to the issuance of building permits for this project:

A. Precise grading plans shall be approved
B. Rough grading completed
119 230
Resolution No. PC 2023-_____

C. Compaction certification
D. Pad elevation certification
E. Rough grade inspection signed off by a City Building Inspector

31. The applicant shall combine the existing 31 parcels into four (4) parcels as identified in the Tentative Parcel Map and shall be dome so that the proposed structure(s) doe not cross any lot line and complies with all requirement of the California Building Code, prior to any building permits being issued.

32. If hazardous substances are used and/or stored, a technical opinion and report, identifying and developing methods of protection from the hazards presented by the hazardous materials, may be required. This report shall be prepared by a qualified person, firm, or corporation and submitted to Building & Safety. This report shall also explain the proposed facility's intended methods of operation and list all of the proposed materials, their quantities, classifications, and the effects of any chemical (material) inter-mixing in the event of an accident or spill.

33. The Construction Waste Management Plan (CWMP) will be required at time of plan check submittal. For more information regarding waste diversion, please contact Burrtec Waste at (909) 889-0911.

34. For more information related to Building & Safety, please visit our web page at https://www.fontana.org/136/Building-Safety.

ENGINEERING LAND DEVELOPMENT:

35. The project shall be served by the City’s sanitary sewer system, all sewer facilities shall be constructed in accordance with the City Standards. Main trunk sewer line shall be in accordance with master sanitary sewer plan or as approved by the City Engineer.

36. The applicant shall obtain design and plan approval from all utility providers having jurisdiction over the on-site and off-site utilities. Completion of all undergrounding of onsite and off-site utilities is required by Section 27-52 of the City Municipal Code and in accordance with plans and specifications approved by the City Engineer.

37. It is the Applicant’s responsibility to maintain all improvements and utilities within the public right-of-way, including street sweeping, prior to issuance of final certificate of occupancy by the City.

38. The applicant shall obtain an encroachment permit and approval from Caltrans for any improvements that encroach into Caltrans’ right-of-way.

39. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Purchase, Sale and Disposition Agreement (PSDA) approved at City Council on June 14th, 2022.

PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMIT
120 231
Resolution No. PC 2023-_____

40. The Applicant shall submit and gain approval of a complete Water Quality Management Plan report in accordance with the County of San Bernardino Technical Guidance Document and latest template.

PRIOR TO MAP RECORDATION

41. Applicant shall provide a Land Improvement Agreement, with accompanying security. The agreement shall be executed on City-provided forms.

PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION PERMITS

42. The applicant shall record all parcel map, right-of-way dedications, easements, and reciprocal access agreement as required for the development.

43. Applicant shall submit engineered improvement plans and obtain full approval. All required public improvements, including but not limited to streets, storm drainage systems, sewers, traffic signals, streetlights, striping, signs, landscape, and any required traffic control and/or detour plans. All plans shall conform to City Standards and Specifications, and as approved by the City Engineer.

PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY

44. The applicant/engineer to provide the City of Fontana with As Built/Record Drawings for all public improvement plans.

45. Applicant/Engineer shall provide centerline ties to the City of Fontana reflecting proper setting of all survey monuments within the project limits and replace any existing survey monuments damaged or removed during construction.

46. The applicant/Engineer shall set survey monuments as required by the map and corner records must be recorded with the County.

47. The applicant/Landscape Architect shall provide a “Landscape Certificate of Compliance” certifying that the work has been designed, installed, and will be maintained in accordance with the City of Fontana’s Model Water Efficiency Landscape Ordinance (Ordinance 1743, FCC Section 28).

48. All sewers shall be video inspected by applicant/contractor. Sewer video shall include clean-out connection, clean-out to lateral segment, lateral, and main line.

Contractor performing the video inspection must have a NASSCO PACP, LACP, and MACP certification. Applicant shall provide a copy of the video on DVD or flash drive to inspection staff with an accompanying full report. Videos to be inspected and approved by City Inspector. If removal and replacement of any utility is required, a subsequent video of the repair will be required. If a TCO (Temporary Certificate of Occupancy) is required a full video inspection will be required as well at that time.

49. All storm drains shall be video inspected by applicant/contractor. Storm drain video shall include main lines and laterals. Applicant shall provide a copy of the video on 121 232
Resolution No. PC 2023-_____

DVD or flash drive to inspection staff. Videos to be inspected and approved by City Inspector. If removal and replacement of any utility is required, a subsequent video of the repair will be required.

50. The Applicant/Engineer of Record shall submit a conforming copy of the recorded Memorandum of Agreement for the Water Quality Management Plan and Storm Water Best Management Practice transfer. The Access, Maintenance, and the WQMP Certification for BMP Completion must be submitted to the City Project Engineer.

51. The applicant’s engineer shall prepare and submit traffic signal plans per approved site plan and as required to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

PUBLIC WORKS:

52. All commercial facilities must complete an Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permit application prior to final Certificate of Occupancy (FMC 23-218).

53. All commercial or industrial facilities within the following categories must install a gravity separation interceptor to comply with the requirements of FMC Section 23-190 unless the requirement is modified by a variance issued by the Public Services Director.

Solid Waste:

54. All Commercial, Industrial, Institutional, or Residential buildings having 5 or more living units must provide refuse collection areas (AB 1327). Design plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction and shall meet the following design requirements:
 These areas (Trash Enclosures) shall be of adequate size to contain a refuse and recycling bin and provide convenient accessibility for the deposit and collection of these materials. (AB 1327)
 The standard bin size provided by the City of Fontana’s franchise hauler for commercial establishments is 7'L x 4'W x 5'H.
 Collection areas must adequately protect recyclable materials from the harmful effects of the weather. (FMC 24-12, AB 1327)
 Refuse collection areas used by food service facilities (restaurants, bakeries, coffee or juice bars, ice cream stores, or food processing) for the collection of food wastes shall have a solid roof (NPDES Standard BMP).

55. All Commercial, Industrial and construction projects must comply with the requirements of FMC 24-11; General Standards relating to the hauling of refuse and/or recycling by the City’s franchise hauler during construction and post-construction.

Storm Water:
122 233
Resolution No. PC 2023-_____

56. All parkway culverts constructed for the purpose of conveying storm water from the project to a public right of way must be maintained in operating condition by the property owner.

SCHOOL DISTRICT:

57. Prior to issuance of building permits the applicant shall be responsible for paying the applicable school district fee.

POLICE DEPARTMENT:

58. Adhere to the City standard of one foot candle minimum for all entrances, exits, pedestrian paths, parking lots, and activity areas. All areas shall be illuminated during all hours of darkness and all luminaries utilized shall be vandal-resistant fixtures. The type of lighting shall be fluorescent, white L.E.D.s or metal halide.

Provide a photometric layout under separate exhibit.

59. Adhere to the Standard Building Security Specifications of the Fontana Police Department.

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY HAZARDOUSE MATERIALS DIVSION:

60. Prior to occupancy, the business operator shall be required to apply for one or more of the following permits, or apply for exemption from hazardous materials laws and regulations: Hazardous Materials Permit, Hazardous Waste Permit, Aboveground Storage Tank Permit, or Underground Storage Tank Permit. Application for one or more of these permits shall occur by submitting a hazardous materials business plan using the California Environmental Reporting System (CERS) http://cers.calepa.ca.gov/ Additional information can be found at http://www.sbcfire.org/ofm/Hazmat/PoliciesProcedures.aspx or you may contact The Office of the Fire Marshal, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 386-8401.

61. Facilities having an aggregate store capacity of over 1320 gallons of petroleum products on site must prepare and implement a Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasures (SPCC) Plan prior to having petroleum product in them. 40 CFR 1 112.3
FIRE DEPARTMENT:

62. Jurisdiction. The above referenced project is under the jurisdiction of the Fontana fire Protection District (herein “Fire Department”). Prior to any construction occurring on any parcel, the applicant shall contact the Fire Department for verification of current fire protection requirements. All new construction shall comply with the current California Fire Code requirements and all applicable statutes, codes, ordinances, and standards of the Fire Department.

63. Fire Access Road Width. Prior to map recordation, all fire access roadways shall be designed to meet the requirements for this development and shall be approved by the Fire Department. All buildings shall have access provided by approved roads, alleys and private drives with a minimum twenty-six (26) foot unobstructed width and 123 234
Resolution No. PC 2023-_____

vertically to fourteen (14) feet six (6) inches in height. Buildings three (3) stories in height or more shall have a minimum access of thirty (30) feet unobstructed width and vertically to fourteen (14) feet six (6) inches in height. California Fire Code Chapter 5 & SBCoFD Standard A-1.

64. Turnaround. An Approved turnaround shall be provided at the end of each roadway one hundred and fifty (150) feet or more in length. Cul-de-sac length shall not exceed six hundred (600) feet; all roadways shall not exceed a 12 % grade and have a minimum of nineteen (19) foot inside radius and a forty-five (45) foot outside radius for all turns.

65. Street Signs. Approved temporary or permanent street signs shall be installed throughout the project prior any combustible materials being placed on the construction site. California Fire Code Chapter 5 & SBCoFD Standard A-2.

66. Fire Lanes. The applicant shall submit a site plan to the Fire Department for review and approval of all proposed signage and striping for all fire access roadways. All curbs adjacent to fire lanes shall be painted red and “No Parking, Fire Lane” signs shall be installed on public and private roads in accordance with approved standards. SBCoFD Standard A-2.

67. Water System Commercial. Prior to map recordation, all water supply systems shall be designed to meet the required fire flow for this development and shall be approved by the Fire Department. The required fire flow shall be determined by using Appendix BB of the California Fire Code. A minimum of one new six (6) inch fire hydrant assembly with two (2) two and one half (2 1/2) inch and one (1) four (4) inch outlet (4”x2.5”x2.5”) shall be provided. All fire hydrants shall be spaced no more than three hundred (300) feet apart as measured along vehicular travel-ways.

California Fire Code Chapter 5 & SBCoFD Standard W-2.

The Fire Flow for this project shall be: 4000 GPM for a two-hour duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure. Fire Flow is based on a 122,151 Square Foot structure.

68. Hydrant Marking. Blue reflective pavement markers indicating fire hydrant locations shall be installed as specified by the Fire Department. SBCFD Standard W-2.

69. Water System Certification. The applicant shall provide the Fire Department with a letter from the serving water company, certifying that the required water improvements have been made or that the existing fire hydrants and water system will meet distance and fire flow requirements. Fire flow water supply shall be in place prior to placing combustible materials on the jobsite. California Fire Code Chapter

5. 70. Combustible Protection. Prior to combustibles being placed on the project site an approved paved roadway providing fire access and fire hydrants providing an acceptable fire flow shall be installed. California Fire Code Chapter 5.

71. Fire Sprinkler-NFPA #13. An automatic fire sprinkler system complying with NFPA 13 and Fire Department standards is required. A fire sprinkler contractor shall submit three (3) sets of detailed plans to the Fire Department for review and approval. The 124 235
Resolution No. PC 2023-_____

plans shall include hydraulic calculations and manufacturer specification sheets. The required fees shall be paid at the time of plan submittal. California Fire Code Chapter 9 & SBCoFD Standard F-1.

72. Standpipe system. A standpipe system is required. A fire sprinkler contractor shall submit three (3) sets of hydraulic calculations and detailed plans to the Fire Department for review and approval. The system shall comply with NFPA 14 and Fire Department standards. The required fees shall be paid at the time of plan submittal. California Fire Code Chapter 9.

73. Hood and Duct Extinguishing system. An automatic hood and duct fire extinguishing system is required. A licensed contractor shall submit three (3) sets of detailed plans (minimum 1/8” scale) with manufactures’ specification sheets to the Fire Department for review and approval. The required fees shall be paid at the time of plan submittal. California Fire Code Chapter 9, NFPA 17A, & NFPA 96.

74. Fire Alarm, Manual or Automatic. A manual, automatic or manual and automatic fire alarm system complying with the California Fire Code, NFPA 72 and all applicable codes is required. A fire alarm contractor shall submit three (3) sets of detailed plans to the Fire Department for review and approval. The required fees shall be paid at the time of plan submittal. California Fire Code Chapter 9, SBCFD Standard F-5, & NFPA 72.

75. Fire Alarm, Waterflow Monitoring. A water flow monitoring fire alarm system complying with the California Fire Code, NFPA and all applicable codes is required for fire sprinkler systems with twenty (20) sprinkler heads or more. A fire alarm contractor shall submit three (3) sets of detailed plans to the Fire Department for review and approval. The required fees shall be paid at the time of plan submittal.

California Fire Code Chapter 9, NFPA 72 & SBCoFD Standard F-5.

76. Smoke Removal. An automatic smoke removal system complying with the California Fire Code, NFPA and all applicable codes is required. The applicant shall submit three (3) sets of detailed smoke removal system plans to the Fire Department for review and approval. The required fees shall be paid at the time of plan submittal.

California Fire Code Chapter 9. This requirement will be for the hotel.

77. Fire Extinguishers. Hand portable fire extinguishers are required. The location, type, and cabinet design shall be approved by the Fire Department. California Fire Code Chapter 9.

78. Commercial Addressing. Commercial, industrial, and multi-family developments of 100,000 sq. ft or less shall have the street address installed on the building with numbers that are a minimum six (8) inches in height and with a one (1) inch stroke.

The street address shall be visible from the street. During the hours of darkness, the numbers shall be electrically illuminated (internal or external). Where the building is two hundred (200) feet or more from the roadway, additional non-illuminated contrasting six (6) inch numbers shall be displayed at the property access entrances.

California Fire Code Chapter 5 & SBCoFD Standard B-1
125 236
Resolution No. PC 2023-_____

79. Commercial (large facility) Addressing. Commercial and industrial developments in excess of 100,000 sq. ft. shall have the street address installed on the building with numbers that are a minimum twelve (12) inches in height and with a one and one half (1 ½) inch stroke. The street address shall be visible from the street. During the hours of darkness, the numbers shall be electrically illuminated (internal or external). Where the building is two hundred (200) feet or more from the roadway, additional non-illuminated contrasting six (6) inch numbers shall be displayed at the property access entrances. California Fire Code Chapter 5 & SBCoFD Standard B1

80. Illuminated Site Diagram. The applicant shall submit for review and approval a site diagram plan to the Fire Department. The applicant shall install at each entrance to a multi-family complex an illuminated diagrammatic representation of the complex, which shows the location of each unit and each fire hydrant. California Fire Code Chapter 5 & SBCoFD Standard B-1

81. Key Box. An approved Fire Department key box is required. The key box shall be provided with a tamper switch and shall be monitored by a Fire Department approved central monitoring service. California Fire Code Chapter 5 & SBCoFD Standard A-4

82. Security Gates. In commercial, industrial, and multi-family complexes, all swing gates shall have an approved fire department Knox Lock. Where an automatic electric security gate is used, an approved Fire Department override switch is required. California Fire Code Chapter 5 & SBCoFD Standard A-3

83. Material Identification Placards. The applicant shall install, in all locations deemed appropriate by the Fire Department, approved material identification placards on the outside of all buildings and/or storage tanks that store hazardous or flammable materials. Additional placards shall be required inside the buildings when chemicals are segregated into separate areas. California Fire Code Chapter 50 & NFPA 704.

84. Secondary Access. The development shall have a minimum of two points of vehicular access during each phase of construction for fire and emergency access purposes and for evacuation routes. SBCoFD Standard A-1

85. Spark Arrestor. An approved spark arrestor is required. Every chimney that is used in conjunction with any fireplace or any heating appliance in which solid or liquid fuel are used, shall have an approved spark arrestor visible from the ground that is maintained in conformance with Fire Department requirements. California Fire Code Chapter 6.

END OF CONDITIONS
126 237
ATTACHMENT NO. 7

NOTICE OF DETERMINATION
TO: X County Clerk, County of FROM: City of Fontana
San Bernardino Planning Division
8353 Sierra Avenue
___ Office of Planning and Research Fontana, CA 92335
SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in Compliance with Section 21152 of the Public Resources Code.

Project Title: Master Case No. 20-083, Tentative Parcel Map No. (20464) No. 20-021, Variance No. 22- 001, Conditional Use Permit No. 20-025, Conditional Use Permit No. 22-018, Conditional Use Permit No. 22-019, Conditional Use Permit No. 22-028 and Design Review No. 20-031 – Fontana Square Project
State Clearinghouse Number: N/A
Name of Person or Agency carrying out project: Salvador Quintanilla – Senior Planner. City of Fontana (Lead Agency) 8353 Sierra Avenue, Fontana, CA 92335.

Project Location: The project site is located on the northwest corner of South Highland Avenue and Citrus Avenue (APNs: 0228-301-01 through -08, 0228-310-20, -21, -22, -23, 0228-310-33 through -49, -51, and 52).

Project Description: Tentative Parcel Map No. 20464 (TPM No. 20-021) – a request to combine 31 parcels and vacate a portion of Highland Avenue into four parcels; Variance No. 22-001 a request to reduce the landscape setback abutting a freeway from 25 feet to two feet in partial location at the rear of the project site; Conditional Use Permit No. 20-025 – a request to establish a 5-story, 75 room, Holiday Inn Express and 5-story, 109 room, Staybridge Suites Hotel; Conditional Use Permit No. 22-018 – a request to operate a State of California Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC) license type 41 (On-Sale Beer & Wine – Eating Place) for the Staybridge Hotel; Conditional Use Permit No. 22-019 – a request to operate a State of California Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC) license type 47 (On-Sale General – Eating Place) for the place of assembly; Conditional Use Permit No. 22-028 – a request to operate a place of assembly (banquet hall) with the Fontana Square commercial center; and Design Review No. 20-031 – a request for the site and architectural review for the development of commercial retail center which includes, a banquet hall, two hotels, a site down restaurant, and an In-n-out drive-through restaurant on an approximately 8.9 adjusted gross acre site located within General Commercial (C-2) Zoning District..

Project Proponent & Address: Jinder Singh, 61380 29 Palms Highway, Suite 15 &16, Joshua Tree, CA 92252
Contact Name & Phone: Jinder Singh – (760) 832-1760
This is to certify that on January 17, 2023, the Planning Commission of the City of Fontana approved the above-described project along with the aforementioned Mitigated Negative Declaration, and made the following determinations:

1. The project ____ will X will not have a significant effect on the environment. 127 238
ATTACHMENT NO. 7

2. A Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared and certified for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA and reflects the independent judgment of the Lead Agency.

3. Mitigation measures X were were not made a condition of the approval of the project.

4. A Statement of Overriding Considerations __ was X was not adopted for this project.

5. Findings X were were not made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA.

6. The location and custodian of the documents which comprise the record of proceedings for the Addendum are specified as follows:

Custodian: City of Fontana, Planning Department
Location: 8353 Sierra Avenue, Fontana, CA 92335
____________________________
DiTanyon Johnson
Principal Planner
Date Received for Filing
128 239

NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
SI DESEA INFORMACION EN ESPAÑOL REFERENTE A ESTA NOTIFICACION O PROYECTO, FAVOR DE COMUNICARSE AL (909) 350-6728.

The Project site is not on any properties listed under Section 65962.5 of the Government Code.

In compliance with Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132) and the federal rules and regulations adopted in implementation thereof, the Agenda will be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability. Should you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Department by calling (909) 350-7602. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting.

A PUBLIC HEARING HAS BEEN SCHEDULED BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF FONTANA FOR THE FOLLOWING:

Master Case No. 20-083, Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) No. 20-021 (TPM No. 20464), Conditional Use Permit (CUP) No. 20-025, Conditional Use Permit (CUP) No. 22-018, Conditional Use Permit No. 22-019, Conditional Use Permit (CUP) No. 22-028, Design Review Project (DRP) No. 20-031, and Variance (VAR) No. 22-001
The applicant is proposing a development to construct a multi-tenant commercial development on an 8.8-acre site, composed of a banquet hall, a dual branded hotel (Holiday Inn Express / a Staybridge Suites), a Restaurant, and an In-N-Out Burger. Additionally, a State of California Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC) Licenses type 41 for the Staybridge Hotel, and type 47 for the Banquet Hall, a Tentative Parcel Map to subdivide the property into four (4) parcels, the site and architectural review for the commercial development, and a Variance to reduce the rear yard setback abutting the freeway from 25 feet to 2 feet. The project includes onsite improvements such as decorative landscaping, surface parking, drive thru, security lighting and among other associated improvements.

Environmental
Determination:

An Initial Study/Mitigated Negative
Declaration (IS/MND) has been
prepared for this project in accordance
with Section 15072 of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
and Section 6.04 of the 2019 City of
Fontana Local Guidelines for
Implementing the CEQA. Based on
the information in the IS/MND, all
significant impacts anticipated as a
result of project implementation would
be less than with mitigation
incorporated, and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) has been prepared for the Planning Commission’s consideration; therefore, a Notice of Determination has been prepared.

Location of
Property:
16014 S. Highland Avenue, Fontana, CA.
(APNs: 0228-301-01 through -08, 0228-310-
20, -21, -22, -23, 0228-310-33 through -49, -
51, and 52)
Date of Hearing: January 17, 2023
ATTACHMENT NO. 8 129 240
Place of Hearing: City Hall Council Chambers
8353 Sierra Avenue
Fontana, CA 92335
Time of Hearing: 6:00 P.M.

Should you have any questions concerning this project, please contact Salvador Quintanilla, Senior Planner, at (909) 350-6656 or [email protected].

The City of Fontana (City) has prepared an Initial Study (IS)/Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the proposed project. The period for comment regarding the mitigated negative declaration for this project is from December 23, 2022 to January 17, 2023. The initial study and proposed mitigated negative declaration are available for review at City Hall (8353 Sierra Avenue Fontana, CA 92335) and online at https://www.fontana.org/2137/Environmental-Documents. Please submit your comments via email to Salvador Quintanilla at [email protected].

ANY INTERESTED PARTY MAY APPEAR AND PRESENT ANY INFORMATION WHICH MAY BE OF ASSISTANCE TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION. A COPY OF THE APPLICATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION IS AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION IN THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, CITY HALL. ANY

INTERESTED PARTY MAY PROVIDE INFORMATION BY LETTER OR EMAIL WHICH MAY BE OF ASSISTANCE TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION. A COPY OF THE APPLICATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION IS AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION. PLEASE CONTACT THE PLANNER LISTED ABOVE.

IF YOU CHALLENGE IN COURT ANY ACTION TAKEN CONCERNING A PUBLIC HEARING ITEM, YOU MAY

BE LIMITED TO RAISING ONLY THOSE ISSUES YOU OR SOMEONE ELSE RAISED AT THE PUBLIC

HEARING DESCRIBED IN THIS NOTICE, OR IN WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE TO THE CITY AT, OR PRIOR TO, THE PUBLIC HEARING.

Publish: December 23, 2022
130 241
City of Fontana
Planning Commission
Minutes
Cathline Fort, Chair
Raj Sangha, Vice Chair
ldilio Sanchez, Secretary
Ralph Thrasher, Commissioner
Tuesday, January 17, 2023 6:00 P.M. Grover W. Taylor Council Chambers _________________________________________________________________________ CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL:

A. Call to Order/Roll Call:

A regular meeting of the City of Fontana Planning Commission was held on Tuesday, January 17, 2023. Chair Fort called the meeting to order at 6:02 p.m.

Present: Chair Fort, Vice Chair Sangha, Secretary Sanchez, and Commissioner Thrasher

Absent: None
INVOCATION/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:

A. Invocation/Pledge of Allegiance:

Following the Invocation by Commissioner Thrasher, the Pledge of Allegiance was led by Secretary Sanchez.

PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS:

A. Public Communications:

None.
242
Planning Commission Minutes January 17, 2023

CONSENT CALENDAR:

A. Approval of Minutes:

Approve the Regular Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of December 20th, 2022.

ACTION: A Motion was made by Vice Chair Sangha and seconded by Secretary Sanchez and passed unanimously by a vote of 4-0 to approve the Consent Calendar.

The motion carried by the following vote:

Aye: Chair Fort, Vice Chair Sangha, Secretary Sanchez, and Commissioner Thrasher

Absent: None
PUBLIC HEARINGS:

PH-A Master Case No. 20-083: Tentative Parcel Map No. 20464 (TPM No. 20-021), Variance No. 22-001, Conditional Use Permit No. 20-025, Conditional Use Permit No. 22-019, Conditional Use Permit No. 22-028, and Design Review No. 20-031 - for the development of commercial retail center to include a banquet hall, dual branded hotel, restaurant/retail building, and a drive-through restaurant on an approximately 8.9 adjusted gross acre site.

Vice Chair Sangha recused himself due to personally knowing the developer of the project.

Chair Fort opened Public Hearing.

Salvador Quintanilla, Senior Planner, presented the staff report and commented that staff received one comment letter.

The commission and staff discussed the Alcoholic Beverage Control license, variance, and linear feet stacking of the project. Another discussion took place regarding IN-NOUT’s preliminary design of overflow stacking and staff mentioned that the applicant had various methods to control the flow and circulation of traffic. The commission also suggested revising the preliminary design by removing a current planter and adding additional landscape.

Additionally, the commission and staff discussed the color scheme of IN-N-OUT’s building and the possibility of changing the color of the stonework.

The applicant, Jinder Singh, stated that he read and agreed to the Conditions of Approval.

The applicant briefly gave a description of the project and mentioned that they were still looking for one more tenant to fill the restaurant site. 243
Planning Commission Minutes January 17, 2023

Secretary Sanchez thanked the applicant for bringing the project to the city.

The commission and Jeff Bryant, IN-N-OUT’s project manager discussed the parking and stacking of the project and proposed several contingency plans. The commission and Mr.

Bryant also discussed the overflow of traffic, typical and anticipated stacks and how to achieve traffic circulation in order to stay within property limits. Mr. Bryant also proposed several ways to clear traffic stacks and manage traffic flow.

Lastly, there was a second discussion regarding the possibility of changing the color of the building’s stonework to a tan color.

The following individuals spoke in opposition:
• Pastor Zach
• John Sicily
• Frankie Jimenez
• Louie Lopez
• Kelilah Federman
The following individuals spoke in favor:
• George Bratton
• Andrea De Leon
The commission directed staff to share comments regarding the technical studies and the Mitigated Negative Declaration. Staff indicated that they were comfortable that the document was adequate.

The Public Hearing was closed.

RECOMMENDATION:

Based on the information in the staff report and subject to the attached Findings and Conditions of Approval, staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution PC No. 2023-001; and,

1. Adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMRP) and direct staff to file a Notice of Determination; and,

2. Approve Tentative Parcel Map No. 20464 (TPM No. 20-021); and,

3. Approve Variance No. 22-001; and,

4. Approve Conditional Use Permit No. 20-025; and,

5. Approve Conditional Use Permit No. 22-019; and,

6. Approve Conditional Use Permit No. 22-028; and ,

7. Approve Design Review No. 20-031.

ACTION: Motion was made by Secretary Sanchez, seconded by Commissioner Thrasher, and passed by a vote of 3-0-1 to adopt Resolution PC No. 2023-001 and 244
Planning Commission Minutes January 17, 2023

approve Master Case No. 20-083: Tentative Parcel Map No. 20464 (TPM No. 20-021), Variance No. 22-001, Conditional Use Permit No. 20-025, Conditional Use Permit No. 22-019, Conditional Use Permit No. 22-028, and Design Review No. 20-031 The motion carried by the following vote:

1. Approve Tentative Parcel Map No. 20464 (TPM No. 20-021); and,

2. Approve Variance No. 22-001; and,

3. Approve Conditional Use Permit No. 20-025; and,

4. Approve Conditional Use Permit No. 22-019; and,

5. Approve Conditional Use Permit No. 22-028; and ,

6. Approve Design Review No. 20-031.

AYES: Sanchez, Thrasher, Fort; NOES: None; ABSTAIN: Sangha; ABSENT: None Vice Chair Sangha returned to the dais.

PH-B Master Case No. 21-056; Variance No. 22-002; Conditional Use Permit No. 22-023; Administrative Site Plan No. 21-030 - A request to construct a hydrogen fueling station and associated improvements at an existing Circle K site on approximately .48 acres.

Chair Fort opened Public Hearing.

Alejandro Rico, Associate Planner, presented the staff report.

Chair Fort commented on the removal of condition number 28.

The commission and staff briefly discussed the scope of the project and staff confirmed that no resurfacing or branding would be made to the convenience store.

Commissioner Sanchez suggested a fresh coat of paint for the existing building and staff commented that new landscaping would be added to the project.

Commissioner Sangha asked for clarification regarding the property owner and the two separate leases on the property.

The applicant, Ben Steckler, on behalf of Fielder Group, stated that he read and agreed to the Conditions of Approval.

The commission and applicant discussed the possibility of contacting the property owner and request permission to add new paint work to the existing building.

No one spoke in favor or opposition of this item.

The Public Hearing was closed.
245
Jennifer J. Farrell
Direct Dial: (714) 338-1884
E-mail: [email protected]
January 17, 2023
Ru t an & Tu ck er , LL P | 18 57 5 Ja mb or ee Road , 9 t h Fl oo r
I r vi ne , CA 92 61 2 | 71 4 - 64 1- 51 00 | Fa x 71 4 - 546 -90 35 Or an ge Coun ty | Pa lo Alto | San Fra nc is co | www.r u tan . co m 2905/035458-0011
18712265.9 a01/17/23

VIA E-MAIL
Sheila M. Sannadan
Adams Broadwell Joseph & Cardozo
601 Gateway Boulevard, Ste. 1000 South San
Francisco, CA 94080 Email:
[email protected]
Re: City of Fontana’s Response to January 12, 2023 and January 4, 2023 Correspondence Re: Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Fontana Square Project (Master Case No. 20-083).

Dear: Ms. Sannadan,
This office represents the City of Fontana (“City”) as its Assistant City Attorney. Our office is in receipt of your January 12, 2023 letter seeking an extension of the review period for the Mitigated Negative Declaration (“MND”) for the Fontana Square Project (Master Case No. 20-083) (“Extension Letter”), your January 4, 2023 letter requesting access to documents (“Document Request Letter”), and your January 4, 2023 Public Records Act Request for “any and all records referring or related to the Fontana Square Project, Master Case No. 20-083” (“CPRA Letter”), sent on behalf of your client Californians Allied for a Responsible Economy (“CARE CA”). Each of the aforementioned letters relates to the MND for the Fontana Square Project (Master Case No. 20-083) (“Project”).

Your Extension Letter requests that the City extend the public review and comment period on the MND for the Project because CARE CA has not been able to obtain and review certain documents cited in the MND. Your letter asserts that the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) requires the City to provide around 40 documents in response to your Document Request Letter which you describe as submitted “pursuant to CEQA,” specifically CEQA section 21092(b)(1) and CEQA Guidelines section 15072(g)(4), requesting “immediate access to all documents referenced or relied upon;” in the MND.”
As more specifically set forth herein, the City respectfully declines your request to extend the public review and comment period for the Project, because the City has fully complied with its obligations pursuant to CEQA section 21092(b)(1) and CEQA Guidelines section 15072(g)(4).

CEQA section 21092(b)(1) includes public notice requirements for agencies preparing environmental impact reports or negative declarations. It provides, in relevant part “[t]he notice shall specify . . .the address where copies of the draft environmental impact report or negative declaration, and all documents referenced in the draft environmental impact report or negative 246
Sheila M. Sannadan
January 17, 2023

2905/035458-0011
18712265.9 a01/17/23
declaration, are available for review….” (Pub. Res. Code, § 21092(b)(1) [emphasis added].) CEQA Guidelines section 15072(g)(4) clarifies that the notice shall specify “[t]he address where copies of the proposed negative declaration or mitigated declaration and all documents incorporated by reference in the proposed negative declaration or mitigated declaration will be available for public review. This location shall be readily accessible to the public during the lead agency's normal working hours.” (14 Cal. Code Regs., § 15072(g)(4) [emphasis added].) CEQA Guidelines section 15072(g)(4) was most recently amended effective 2018 to clarify that the term “referenced in the proposed negative declaration or mitigated declaration” for the purposes of CEQA section 21092 and CEQA Guidelines section 15072(g)(4) means “incorporated by reference” as described in CEQA Guidelines section 15150.1 In its comments on the amendment, the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research observed that “if the requirement for the lead agency to make documents available for public inspection were to include all documents simply referenced or cited in an EIR or negative declaration, the requirement would be burdensome, unnecessary and unreasonable on lead agencies.” These authorities clarify that CEQA requires that the City provide notice of the address where all documents incorporated by reference in the MND are available for public inspection.

The City’s public notice specified that the MND and all documents incorporated by reference in the MND are available for review at Fontana City Hall, 8353 Sierra Ave., Fontana, CA 92335. The City has therefore complied with its obligations pursuant to pursuant to CEQA section 21092(b)(1) and CEQA Guidelines section 15072(g)(4).

The City will continue responding to your requests for documents in your CPRA Letter in compliance with the California Public Records Act (Gov. Code, §§ 7920.000 et seq) (“CPRA”).

However, the City rejects the assertion in your CPRA Letter that CPRA section 6253 (recodified at Government Code Section 7922.525) entitles you to “immediate access” to the records requested, and that the CPRA response timelines do not apply.

CPRA section 7922.525 provides in full:
(a) Public records are open to inspection at all times during the office hours of a state or local agency and every person has a right to inspect any public record, exempted as otherwise provided.
(b) Any reasonably segregable portion of a record shall be available for inspection by any person requesting the record after deletion of the portions that are exempted by law.

This section is part of the overall framework of the CPRA, but does not provide a separate right of access to the timelines for response. (See Gov. Code, § 7922.535.) CPRA Section 792.525 provides the general public right to inspect records, including a right to inspect records at the 1 Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, November 2017 Proposed Updates to the CEQA Guidelines [https://opr.ca.gov/docs/20171127_Comprehensive_CEQA_Guidelines_Package_Nov_2017.pdf]. 247
Sheila M. Sannadan
January 17, 2023

2905/035458-0011
18712265.9 a01/17/23
business location of a local agency during business hours. This section does not provide an alternative avenue to circumvent the timeframes provided in the CPRA. (See Bruce v. Gregory (1967) 65 Cal.2d 666, 676 [right to public records constrained by an “inherent reasonableness limitation … to protect the safety of the records against theft, mutilation or accidental damage, to prevent inspection from interfering with the orderly function of his office and its employees, and generally to avoid chaos in the record archives.”]; Rosenthal v. Hansen (1973) 34 Cal.App.3d 754, 761.)
For these reasons, the City respectfully declines your request to extend the public review and comment period for the Project.

Very truly yours,

RUTAN & TUCKER, LLP
Jennifer J. Farrell
Assistant City Attorney for the City of Fontana
JF:js
248
6452-005j
KEVIN T. CARMICHAEL
CHRISTINA M. CARO
THOMAS A. ENSLOW
KELILAH D. FEDERMAN
RICHARD M. FRANCO
ANDREW J. GRAF
TANYA A. GULESSERIAN
RACHAEL E. KOSS
AIDAN P. MARSHALL
TARA C. RENGIFO
Of Counsel
MARC D. JOSEPH
DANIEL L. CARDOZO
.

SO. SAN FRANCISCO OFFICE
601 GATEWAY BLVD., SUITE 1000
SO. SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080
T E L : ( 6 5 0 ) 5 8 9 - 1 6 6 0
F A X : ( 6 5 0 ) 5 8 9 - 5 0 6 2

ADAMS BROADWELL JOSEPH & CARDOZO

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

A T T O RN E Y S A T L A W
5 2 0 C A P I T O L M A L L , S U I T E 3 5 0
S A C R A M E N T O , C A 9 5 8 1 4 - 47 21
___________
T E L : ( 9 1 6 ) 4 4 4 - 6 2 0 1
F A X : ( 9 1 6 ) 4 4 4 - 6 2 0 9
k c a r m i c h a e l @ a d a m s b r o a d w e l l . c o m printed on recycled paper
January 12, 2023
Via Email and U.S. Mail
Patty Nevins, Director
Planning Department
City of Fontana
8353 Sierra Avenue
Fontana, CA 92335
Email: [email protected]
Via Email Only
Salvador Quintanilla, Senior Planner
Email: [email protected]
Germaine McClellan Key, City Clerk
Office of the City Clerk
City of Fontana
8353 Sierra Avenue
Fontana, CA 92335
Email: [email protected]
Re: Request to Extend the Public Review and Comment Period for the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Continue the Planning Commission Hearing – Fontana Square Project (Master Case No. 20-083)
Dear Ms. Nevins, Ms. Key and Mr. Quintanilla:

On behalf of Californians Allied for a Responsible Economy (“CARE CA”) we respectfully request that the City of Fontana (“City”) extend the public review and comment period for the Mitigated Negative Declaration (“MND”) prepared for the Fontana Square Project, Master Case No. 20-083, (“Project”) proposed by Citrus Development, LLC (“Applicant”) ”), by at least 20 days due to the City’s failure to provide timely access to the supporting documents for the MND. This request is made pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, Pub. Resources Code (“PRC”) §§ 21000 et seq. (“CEQA”) Section 21092(b)(1), which requires that “all documents referenced in the draft environmental impact report or negative declaration” be available for review and “readily accessible” during the entire comment period.1
1 PRC §§ 21092(b)(1) (emphasis added); 14 Cal. Code Regs. (“CCR”) § 15072(g)(4). 249
January 12, 2023

6452-005j
Additionally, CARE CA requests that the City Planning Commission continue the hearing scheduled for January 17, 2023, to a later date in order for the Planning Commission to review and evaluate MND comments received by the City during the public comment period.

The Project consists of a multi-tenant commercial development composed of a banquet hall (2 stories, 38,907 SF), a dual branded Holiday Inn Express/Staybridge Suites hotel (5 stories, 121,094 SF), a convenience store/restaurant (5,000 SF), and an In-N-Out Burger (3,885 SF). The Project includes onsite improvements such as decorative landscaping, surface parking, a drive-through, security lighting and other associated improvements. The Project is located at 16014 S. Highland Avenue, Fontana, CA 92336 (APNs: 0228-301-01 through -08, 0228-310-20, -21, -22, -23, 0228-310-33 through -49, -51, and -52).

The MND was released for public comment on December 23, 2022. The public comment period currently ends on January 17, 2023.2 The Planning Commission’s decisional hearing on the Project is scheduled for January 17, 2023, during the CEQA comment period.

I. THE CITY FAILED TO RELEASE DOCUMENTS REFERENCED

IN THE MND
On January 4, 2023, we submitted a letter to the City pursuant to CEQA Section 21092(b)(1) requesting “immediate access to any and all documents referenced or relied upon” in the MND (“MND Request”) (emphasis added).3 On January 4, 2023, we submitted a letter to the City pursuant to California Public Records Act, Government Code §§ 6250, et seq. and Article I, section 3(b) of the California Constitution, requesting “immediate access to any and all records referring or related” to the Project (“PRA Request”) (emphasis added).4 The MND Request and the PRA Request were sent separately to avoid confusion as to what documents and records were sought.
2 See City of Fontana, Notice of Intent To Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Notice of Public Hearing, Fontana Square Project, available at
https://www.fontana.org/DocumentCenter/View/40643/Fontana-Square-MCN-20-083-PHN-. 3 See Exhibit A, Letter from Adams, Broadwell, Joseph & Cardozo (“ABJC”) re Request for Access to Documents Referenced in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Fontana Square Project (Master Case No. 20-083) (January 4, 2023).
4 See Exhibit B, Letter from ABJC re Request for Immediate Access to Public Records – Fontana Square Project (Master Case No. 20-083) (January 4, 2023). 250
January 12, 2023

6452-005j
On January 4, 2023, the City provided an initial response to our PRA Request through email indicating that the request was received. However, to date, the City has not provided any MND reference documents in response to our MND Request.

During our subsequent review of the MND, we have identified several documents and files that are referenced in the MND which have not been provided in response to our MND Request that are not accompanied by weblinks in the MND or its appendices. These missing documents are critical to understanding and commenting on the MND’s analysis of the Project’s impacts to several critical resource areas, including, in particular, the MND’s air quality, noise, greenhouse gas, and hazardous materials analyses. We are unable to meaningfully review and comment on the MND without these documents.

We found that the following reference documents were not provided in the MND or its appendices:

IS/MND:
• California Air Resources Board, Climate Change Scoping Plan, 2008. • Elliott H. Berger, Rick Neitzel, and Cynthia A. Kladden. Noise Navigator Sound Level Database with Over 1700 Measurement Values, July 6, 2010. • Federal Transit Administration, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual, September 2018.
• Federal Transit Administration, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual, Table 7-2, Page 179, September 2018. • Kariel, H. G., Noise in Rural Recreational Environments, Canadian Acoustics 19(5), 3-10, 1991.
• City of Fontana. 2018. Fontana Fire Protection District Strategic Plan 2018. 5 Appendix A:
• Unlocked CalEEMod input files
• California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), Health Effects, 2018.
• California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), Health Risk Assessments for Proposed Land Use Projects, 2009.
5 MND, p. 168 (Footnote 48 includes a link to this document. However, the link directs to a local file that is not accessible by the public, i.e.
file:///C:/Users/ruben.salas/Downloads/Fontana_Fire_Protection_District_Strategic_Plan_2018%20(1) .pdf.)
251
January 12, 2023

6452-005j
• California Air Resources Board, Aerometric Data Analysis and Measurement System (ADAM) Top Four Summaries from 2018 to 2020, 2021. • California Air Resources Board, Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective, 2005.
• California Air Resources Board, Current Air Quality Standards, 2016. • California Air Resources Board, Risk Reduction Plan to Reduce Particulate Matter Emissions from Diesel-Fueled Engines and Vehicles, 2000. • Federal Highway Administration, Interim Guidance on Mobile Source Air Toxic Analysis in NEPA Documents, 2016.
• Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Risk Assessment Guidelines, 2015.
• South Coast Air Quality Management District, 2016 Air Quality Management Plan, March 2017.
• South Coast Air Quality Management District, CEQA Air Quality Handbook, 1993.
• South Coast Air Quality Management District, Localized Significance Threshold Methodology, 2009.
• United States Environmental Protection Agency, National Ambient Air Quality Standards Table, 2016.
• United States Environmental Protection Agency, Nonattainment Areas for Criteria Pollutants, 2019.
• United States Environmental Protection Agency, Policy Assessment for the Review of the Lead National Ambient Air Quality Standards, 2013.

Appendix D:
• California Air Resources Board, California’s 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan, 2017.
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis, 2007.
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis, Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2013. • National Research Council, Advancing the Science of Climate Change, 2010. • San Bernardino County Transportation Authority, San Bernardino County Regional Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan, March 2014.
• State of California, Code of Regulations Section 15065.5a, 2018. • Southern California Association of Governments, Connect SoCal - 2020 - 2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy, 2020. • South Coast Air Quality Management District, Minutes for the GHG CEQA Significance Threshold Stakeholder Working Group #13, 2009. 252
January 12, 2023

6452-005j
• U.S. EPA, Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990- 2016, 2018.
• U.S. EPA, Methane and Nitrous Oxide Emission from Natural Sources, 2010. • U.S. EPA, Overview of Greenhouse Gases, 2018.

Appendix G:
• California Department of Transportation, California Vehicle Noise Emission Levels, 1987.
• California Department of Transportation, Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol, 2011.
• California Department of Transportation, Technical Noise Supplement to the Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol, 2013.
• California Department of Transportation, Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual, 2020.
• Federal Highway Administration, Roadway Construction Noise Model, 2006. • Federal Highway Administration, Roadway Construction Noise Model User’s Guide Final Report, 2006.
• Federal Interagency Committee on Noise, Federal Agency Review of Selected Airport Noise Analysis Issues, 1992.
• Federal Transit Administration, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual, 2018.
• United States Environmental Protection Agency, Protective Noise Levels (EPA 550/9-79-100), 1979.

Without access to these critical MND reference documents during the public comment period on the MND, CARE CA and other members of the public are precluded from having the meaningful opportunity to comment on the MND that is required by CEQA. The City’s failure to make the underlying MND documents available during the entire comment period makes public review particularly burdensome in this case because of the MND’s reliance on missing documents for significance determinations and mitigation measures to address the Project’s air quality, health risk, noise, and hazardous materials impacts. Without having access to these documents, CARE CA and other members of the public are unable to evaluate the accuracy of the City’s impact analysis, or the efficacy of the City’s proposed mitigation measures. Additionally, the size of the MND and the Project’s complexity make it difficult to effectively comment on the MND without the referenced documents by the current comment deadline of January 17, 2023.

The courts have held that the failure to provide even a few pages of a CEQA documents for a portion of the CEQA review period invalidates the entire CEQA process, and that such a failure must be remedied by permitting additional public 253
January 12, 2023

6452-005j
comment.6 It is also well settled that an MND may not rely on hidden studies or documents that are not provided to the public.7 By failing to make all documents referenced in the MND “readily available” during the current comment period, the City is violating the clear procedural mandates of CEQA, to the detriment of CARE CA and other members of the public who wish to meaningfully review and comment on the MND.

II. THE PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING IS PREMATURE
On December 23, 2022, the City issued a notice stating that the Project will be considered by the City of Fontana Planning Commission on January 17, 2023.

The Planning Commission has approval authority for the Project’s land use permits, including the conditional use permits, design review, tentative parcel map and variance applications.
8 At the hearing, the Commission will therefore consider adoption of the MND, and approval of the Project’s entitlement applications. 9 The
hearing will be conducted the same day as the close of the IS/MND public comment period. The January 17 hearing date for the Project is therefore premature because decision-makers will not have the opportunity to consider all comments received on the MND before making a decision on the Project, as required by CEQA.

CEQA’s “purpose is to inform the public and its responsible officials of the environmental consequences of their decisions before they are made. Thus, the [CEQA document] protects not only the environment, but also informed selfgovernment.”10 Here, the hearing notice indicates that the City is planning on approving the Project without considering all public comments received during the mandatory CEQA comment period on the IS/MND.

CEQA requires the lead agency to receive and consider all public comments received on the MND.11 The purpose of the public comment period is to foster public participation.12 CEQA Guidelines § 15074(b) states:
6 Ultramar v. South Coast Air Quality Man. Dist. (1993) 17 Cal.App.4th 689, 699. 7 Santiago County Water District v. County of Orange (1981) 118 Cal.App.3rd 818, 831 (“Whatever is required to be considered in an EIR must be in that formal report; what any official might have known from other writings or oral presentations cannot supply what is lacking in the report.”). 8 City of Fontana Development Code §§ 30.120, 30-150.
9 City of Fontana, Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Notice of Public Hearing, Master Case No. 20-083 (December 23, 2022) available at https://www.fontana.org/DocumentCenter/View/40643/Fontana-Square-MCN-20-083-PHN10 Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Bd. of Supervisors (“Goleta Valley”) (1990) 52 Cal.3d 553, 564, internal citations omitted.
11 14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15074(b).
12 14 Cal. Code Regs § 15201.
254
January 12, 2023

6452-005j
Prior to approving a project, the decision-making body of the lead agency shall consider the proposed negative declaration or mitigated negative declaration together with any comments received during the public review process.

The decision-making body shall adopt the proposed negative declaration or mitigated negative declaration only if it finds on the basis of the whole record before it (including the initial study and any comments received), that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment and that the negative declaration or mitigated negative declaration reflects the lead agency's independent judgment and analysis.13
Holding a Planning Commission meeting to consider and approve the Project before the City has reviewed and responded to comments on the IS/MND would be a violation of CEQA. The Notice of Intent to adopt the MND does not set a cutoff time for submission of public comments on January 17, implying that comments may be submitted anytime of the day or evening. The Planning Commission hearing is scheduled for 6:00 p.m. during the last day of the public comment period. The hearing would therefore occur before the close of the MND public comment period and would not enable the Planning Commission to consider all comments received on the MND and to exercise independent judgement and analysis as required by CEQA.

The City must continue the Planning Commission hearing to a date after the City has had an opportunity to evaluate any comments on the IS/MND. This would allow for meaningful participation by the public and the detailed consideration of the Project’s environmental impacts that CEQA requires.

Accordingly, we request that:
1) The City immediately provide us with access to the missing MND reference documents identified in this letter, including in particular the unlocked Excel spreadsheets that support the emissions calculations in Appendix A.
13 14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15074(b) (emphasis added).
255
January 12, 2023

6452-005j
2) The City extend the public review and comment period on the MND for at least 20 days from the date on which the City releases these documents for public review.
14 If the missing documents are provided today, we
request an extension to February 1, 2023.
3) The City continue the January 17, 2023 Planning Commission hearing to a date following the close of the public comment period which ensure that the Commission will have adequate time to consider all public comments received during the MND’s public comment period.

Given the short time before the current comment deadline, please contact me as soon as possible with your response to this request, but no later than Thursday January 13, 2023.

Please feel free to call or email with any questions: Tel: (650) 589-1660, Email: [email protected]. Thank you for your prompt attention and response to this matter.

Sincerely,
Kevin Carmichael
KTC:ljl
14 This Project has a 20-day public comment period, pursuant to 14 CCR § 15105(b). 256

EXHIBIT A
257
6452-003acp
KEVIN T. CARMICHAEL
CHRISTINA M. CARO
THOMAS A. ENSLOW
KELILAH D. FEDERMAN
RICHARD M. FRANCO
ANDREW J. GRAF
TANYA A. GULESSERIAN
RACHAEL E. KOSS
AIDAN P. MARSHALL
TARA C. RENGIFO
Of Counsel
MARC D. JOSEPH
DANIEL L. CARDOZO

SACRAMENTO OFFICE
520 CAPITOL MALL, SUITE 350
SACRAMENTO, CA 95814-4721
TEL: (916) 444-6201
FAX: (916) 444-6209

ADAMS BROADWELL JOSEPH & CARDOZO A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

ATTORNEYS AT LAW
601 GATEWAY BOULEVARD, SUITE 1000
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080-7037
___________
TEL: (650) 589-1660
FAX: (650) 589-5062
[email protected]
printed on recycled paper
January 4, 2023
Via Email and U.S. Mail
Patty Nevins, Director
Planning Department
City of Fontana
8353 Sierra Avenue
Fontana, CA 92335
Email: [email protected]
Via Email Only
Salvador Quintanilla, Senior Planner
Email: [email protected]
Germaine McClellan Key, City Clerk
Office of the City Clerk
City of Fontana
8353 Sierra Avenue
Fontana, CA 92335
Email: [email protected]
Re: Request for Access to Documents Referenced in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Fontana Square Project (Master Case No. 20-083)
Dear Ms. Nevins, Ms. Key and Mr. Quintanilla:

We are writing on behalf of Californians Allied for a Responsible Economy (“CARE CA”) to request immediate access to all documents referenced or relied upon in the Mitigated Negative Declaration (“MND”) prepared for the Fontana Square Project, Master Case No. 20-083, (“Project”) proposed by Citrus Development, LLC (“Applicant”). This request excludes a copy of the MND and its appendices. This request also excludes any documents that are currently available on the Project’s webpage on the City of Fontana website, as of today’s date.1 The Project consists of a multi-tenant commercial development composed of a banquet hall (2 stories, 38,907 SF), a dual branded Holiday Inn Express/Staybridge Suites hotel (5 stories, 121,094 SF), a convenience store/restaurant (5,000 SF), and an In-N-Out Burger (3,885 SF). The Project includes onsite improvements such as decorative landscaping, surface parking, a drive-through, security lighting and 1 Accessed https://www.fontana.org/2137/Environmental-Documents on January 4, 2023. 258
January 4, 2023

6452-003acp
printed on recycled paper
other associated improvements. The Project is located at 16014 S. Highland Avenue, Fontana, CA 92336 (APNs: 0228-301-01 through -08, 0228-310-20, -21, -22, -23, 0228-310-33 through -49, -51, and -52).

Our request for access to all documents referenced in the MND is made pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), which requires that all documents referenced, incorporated by reference, and relied upon in an environmental review document be made available to the public for the entire comment period.2
If the requested documents are in electronic format, please email them using a file hosting program such as NextRequest, Sharepoint or a similar service.

Alternatively, if the electronic documents are 10 MB or less (or can be easily broken into chunks of 10 MB or less), they may be emailed to me as attachments.

Please use the following contact information for all correspondence regarding this request:

Sheila M. Sannadan
Adams Broadwell Joseph & Cardozo
601 Gateway Boulevard, Ste. 1000
South San Francisco, CA 94080
Email: [email protected]
Phone: (650) 589-1660
Thank you for your assistance with this matter.

Sincerely,
Sienna Shankel
Legal Assistant
SLS:acp
2 See Public Resources Code § 21092(b)(1) (stating that “all documents referenced in the draft environmental impact report or negative declaration” shall be made “available for review”); 14 Cal. Code Reg. § 15072(g)(4) (stating that all documents incorporated by reference in the MND . . . “shall be readily accessible to the public”); see also Vineyard Area Citizens for Responsible Growth, Inc. v. City of Rancho Cordova (2007) 40 Cal.4th 412, 442, as modified (Apr. 18, 2007) (EIR must transparently incorporate and describe the reference materials relied on in its analysis); Santiago County Water District v. County of Orange (1981) 118 Cal.App.3rd 818, 831 (“[W]hatever is required to be considered in an EIR must be in that formal report. . .”), internal citations omitted.
259

EXHIBIT B
260
6452-002acp
KEVIN T. CARMICHAEL
CHRISTINA M. CARO
THOMAS A. ENSLOW
KELILAH D. FEDERMAN
RICHARD M. FRANCO
ANDREW J. GRAF
TANYA A. GULESSERIAN
RACHAEL E. KOSS
AIDAN P. MARSHALL
TARA C. RENGIFO
Of Counsel
MARC D. JOSEPH
DANIEL L. CARDOZO

SACRAMENTO OFFICE
520 CAPITOL MALL, SUITE 350
SACRAMENTO, CA 95814-4721
TEL: (916) 444-6201
FAX: (916) 444-6209

ADAMS BROADWELL JOSEPH & CARDOZO A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

ATTORNEYS AT LAW
601 GATEWAY BOULEVARD, SUITE 1000
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080-7037
___________
TEL: (650) 589-1660
FAX: (650) 589-5062
[email protected]
printed on recycled paper
January 4, 2022
Via Email and U.S. Mail
Via Email Only
Salvador Quintanilla, Senior Planner
Email: [email protected]
Via Online Portal
https://www.fontana.org/formcenter/city-14/public-records-request-form-85 Re: Request for Immediate Access to Public Records – Fontana Square Project (Master Case No. 20-083)
Dear Ms. Nevins, Ms. Key and Mr. Quintanilla:

We are writing on behalf of Californians Allied for a Responsible Economy (“CARE CA”) to request immediate access to any and all records referring or related to the Fontana Square Project, Master Case No. 20-083, (“Project”) proposed by Citrus Development, LLC (“Applicant”). This request includes, but is not limited to, any and all file materials, applications, correspondence, resolutions, memos, notes, analyses, electronic mail messages, files, maps, charts, and/or any other documents related to the Project.

The Project consists of a multi-tenant commercial development composed of a banquet hall (2 stories, 38,907 SF), a dual branded Holiday Inn Express/Staybridge Suites hotel (5 stories, 121,094 SF), a convenience store/restaurant (5,000 SF), and an In-N-Out Burger (3,885 SF). The Project includes onsite improvements such as decorative landscaping, surface parking, a drive-through, security lighting and Patty Nevins, Director
Planning Department
City of Fontana
8353 Sierra Avenue
Fontana, CA 92335
Email: [email protected]
Germaine McClellan Key, City Clerk
Office of the City Clerk
City of Fontana
8353 Sierra Avenue
Fontana, CA 92335
Email: [email protected]
261
January 4, 2023

6452-002acp
printed on recycled paper
other associated improvements. The Project is located at 16014 S. Highland Avenue, Fontana, CA 92336 (APNs: 0228-301-01 through -08, 0228-310-20, -21, -22, -23, 0228-310-33 through -49, -51, and -52).

This request is made pursuant to the California Public Records Act, Government Code §§ 6250, et seq. In addition, we request these materials pursuant to Article I, section 3(b) of the California Constitution, which provides a constitutional right of access to information concerning the conduct of the government. Article I, section 3(b) provides that any statutory right to information shall be broadly construed to provide the greatest access to government information and further requires that any statute that limits the right of access to information be narrowly construed.

We request immediate access to review the above documents pursuant to section 6253(a) of the Public Records Act, which requires public records to be “open to inspection at all times during the office hours of the state or local agency” and provides that “every person has a right to inspect any public record.” Gov. Code § 6253(a). Therefore, the 10-day response period applicable to a “request for a copy of records” under Section 6253(c) does not apply to this request.

Pursuant to Government Code section 6253.9, if the requested documents are in electronic format, please email them using a file hosting program such as NextRequest, Sharepoint or a similar service. Alternatively, if the electronic documents are 10 MB or less (or can be easily broken into chunks of 10 MB or less), they may be emailed to me as attachments.

Please use the following contact information for all correspondence regarding this request:

Sheila M. Sannadan
Adams Broadwell Joseph & Cardozo
601 Gateway Boulevard, Ste. 1000
South San Francisco, CA 94080
Email: [email protected]
Phone: (650) 589-1660
262
January 4, 2023

6452-002acp
printed on recycled paper
Thank you for your assistance with this matter.

Sincerely,
Sienna Shankel
Legal Assistant
SLS:acp
263
6452-003acp
KEVIN T. CARMICHAEL
CHRISTINA M. CARO
THOMAS A. ENSLOW
KELILAH D. FEDERMAN
RICHARD M. FRANCO
ANDREW J. GRAF
TANYA A. GULESSERIAN
RACHAEL E. KOSS
AIDAN P. MARSHALL
TARA C. RENGIFO
Of Counsel
MARC D. JOSEPH
DANIEL L. CARDOZO

SACRAMENTO OFFICE
520 CAPITOL MALL, SUITE 350
SACRAMENTO, CA 95814-4721
TEL: (916) 444-6201
FAX: (916) 444-6209

ADAMS BROADWELL JOSEPH & CARDOZO A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

ATTORNEYS AT LAW
601 GATEWAY BOULEVARD, SUITE 1000
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080-7037
___________
TEL: (650) 589-1660
FAX: (650) 589-5062
[email protected]
printed on recycled paper
January 4, 2023
Via Email and U.S. Mail
Patty Nevins, Director
Planning Department
City of Fontana
8353 Sierra Avenue
Fontana, CA 92335
Email: [email protected]
Via Email Only
Salvador Quintanilla, Senior Planner
Email: [email protected]
Germaine McClellan Key, City Clerk
Office of the City Clerk
City of Fontana
8353 Sierra Avenue
Fontana, CA 92335
Email: [email protected]
Re: Request for Access to Documents Referenced in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Fontana Square Project (Master Case No. 20-083)
Dear Ms. Nevins, Ms. Key and Mr. Quintanilla:

We are writing on behalf of Californians Allied for a Responsible Economy (“CARE CA”) to request immediate access to all documents referenced or relied upon in the Mitigated Negative Declaration (“MND”) prepared for the Fontana Square Project, Master Case No. 20-083, (“Project”) proposed by Citrus Development, LLC (“Applicant”). This request excludes a copy of the MND and its appendices. This request also excludes any documents that are currently available on the Project’s webpage on the City of Fontana website, as of today’s date.1 The Project consists of a multi-tenant commercial development composed of a banquet hall (2 stories, 38,907 SF), a dual branded Holiday Inn Express/Staybridge Suites hotel (5 stories, 121,094 SF), a convenience store/restaurant (5,000 SF), and an In-N-Out Burger (3,885 SF). The Project includes onsite improvements such as decorative landscaping, surface parking, a drive-through, security lighting and 1 Accessed https://www.fontana.org/2137/Environmental-Documents on January 4, 2023. 264
January 4, 2023

6452-003acp
printed on recycled paper
other associated improvements. The Project is located at 16014 S. Highland Avenue, Fontana, CA 92336 (APNs: 0228-301-01 through -08, 0228-310-20, -21, -22, -23, 0228-310-33 through -49, -51, and -52).

Our request for access to all documents referenced in the MND is made pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), which requires that all documents referenced, incorporated by reference, and relied upon in an environmental review document be made available to the public for the entire comment period.2
If the requested documents are in electronic format, please email them using a file hosting program such as NextRequest, Sharepoint or a similar service.

Alternatively, if the electronic documents are 10 MB or less (or can be easily broken into chunks of 10 MB or less), they may be emailed to me as attachments.

Please use the following contact information for all correspondence regarding this request:

Sheila M. Sannadan
Adams Broadwell Joseph & Cardozo
601 Gateway Boulevard, Ste. 1000
South San Francisco, CA 94080
Email: [email protected]
Phone: (650) 589-1660
Thank you for your assistance with this matter.

Sincerely,
Sienna Shankel
Legal Assistant
SLS:acp
2 See Public Resources Code § 21092(b)(1) (stating that “all documents referenced in the draft environmental impact report or negative declaration” shall be made “available for review”); 14 Cal. Code Reg. § 15072(g)(4) (stating that all documents incorporated by reference in the MND . . . “shall be readily accessible to the public”); see also Vineyard Area Citizens for Responsible Growth, Inc. v. City of Rancho Cordova (2007) 40 Cal.4th 412, 442, as modified (Apr. 18, 2007) (EIR must transparently incorporate and describe the reference materials relied on in its analysis); Santiago County Water District v. County of Orange (1981) 118 Cal.App.3rd 818, 831 (“[W]hatever is required to be considered in an EIR must be in that formal report. . .”), internal citations omitted.
265
6452-011j
KEVIN T. CARMICHAEL
CHRISTINA M. CARO
THOMAS A. ENSLOW
KELILAH D. FEDERMAN
RICHARD M. FRANCO
ANDREW J. GRAF
TANYA A. GULESSERIAN
RACHAEL E. KOSS
AIDAN P. MARSHALL
TARA C. RENGIFO
Of Counsel
MARC D. JOSEPH
DANIEL L. CARDOZO
.

SO. SAN FRANCISCO OFFICE
601 GATEWAY BLVD., SUITE 1000
SO. SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080
T E L : ( 6 5 0 ) 5 8 9 - 1 6 6 0
F A X : ( 6 5 0 ) 5 8 9 - 5 0 6 2

ADAMS BROADWELL JOSEPH & CARDOZO

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

A T T O RN E Y S A T L A W
5 2 0 C A P I T O L M A L L , S U I T E 3 5 0
S A C R A M E N T O , C A 9 5 8 1 4 - 47 21
___________
T E L : ( 9 1 6 ) 4 4 4 - 6 2 0 1
F A X : ( 9 1 6 ) 4 4 4 - 6 2 0 9
k c a r m i c h a e l @ a d a m s b r o a d w e l l . c o m printed on recycled paper
January 30, 2023

VIA ONLINE SUBMISSION
Acquanetta Warren, Mayor
City Council
c/o Planning Department
City of Fontana
8353 Sierra Avenue
Fontana, CA 92335
Email: [email protected]
Online Portal: https://cityoffontana.sharefile.com/

VIA EMAIL
Salvador Quintanilla, Senior Planner
Email: [email protected]
Re: Appeal of Planning Commission Approval of the Fontana Square Project (Master Case No. 20-083) and Initial
Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Justification of Appeal Dear Mayor Warren, Councilmembers and Mr. Quintanilla:

On behalf of Californians Allied for a Responsible Economy (“CARE CA”), we are writing to appeal the City of Fontana (“City”) Planning Commission’s January 17, 2023 approval of the Fontana Square Project (“Project” ), Master Case No. 20- 083; Tentative Parcel Map No. 20464 (TPM No. 20-021); Conditional Use Permit No. 20-025; Conditional Use Permit No. 22-018; Conditional Use Permit No. 22-019; Conditional Use Permit No. 22-028; Design Review Project No. 20-031; Variance No. 22-001; and the Commission’s approval of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (“MND”) prepared by the City of Fontana (“City”) for the Project.1 1 City of Fontana, Fontana Square Project, Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (hereinafter “MND”) (December 2022) available at
https://www.fontana.org/DocumentCenter/View/40634/Fontana-Square-Project-Public-Draft-InitialStudy-Mitigated-Negative-Declaration 266
January 30, 2023

6452-011j
The Project, proposed by Jinder Singh (the “Applicant”), proposes the construction of a banquet hall (“Development A”), a Holiday Inn Express Hotel & Suite and a Staybridge Suites (“Development B”), a convenience (“CStore”)/Restaurant (“Development C”), and an In-N-Out Burger (“Development D”).2 The establishments would be generally located closer to the northern property boundary with most of the vehicle parking stalls along S.

Highland Avenue, Citrus Avenue.3 Parking is also provided throughout the site and between the various establishments.4
Pursuant to the City’s appeal procedures5, we have provided an electronic copy of this Justification for Appeal letter and the Uniform Application. We have also paid the required appeal fee of $299 and $31 archive fee via the Department of City Planning Online Application Portal.

The reasons for this appeal are that the Planning Commission abused its discretion and violated the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) when it approved the Project and the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration on January 17, 2023.
6 CEQA requires that the potential impacts of this Project be evaluated in an environmental impact report (“EIR”), not in an MND, because substantial evidence supports a fair argument that the Project may have significant, unmitigated air quality, public health, greenhouse gas emissions, public safety, and noise impacts that are not adequately disclosed or mitigated by the MND. The Planning Commission’s findings approving the Project entitlements were similarly unsupported by substantial evidence because the Project’s unmitigated impacts would be detrimental to the health and safety of nearby residents.

CARE CA’s January 17, 2023, comment letter to the Planning Commission. and accompanying reports prepared by air quality and hazards expert James Clark, Ph.D., of Clark and Associates, and noise expert Derek Watry of Wilson-Ihrig, are 2 MND, p. 5.
3 MND, p. 5.
4 MND, p. 5.
5 Fontana Development Code, Division 5, §§ 30-25. – 30-29. 6 City of Fontana, Planning Commission Hearing, Agenda (January 17, 2023) available at https://fontana.legistar.com/MeetingDetail.aspx?ID=1060134&GUID=C8645234-1EFE-4339-A94E7C86F6C7A37D&Options=info|&Search= 267
January 30, 2023

6452-011j
attached hereto and incorporated by reference.7 The specific reasons for this appeal are set forth in detail in that letter and summarized below.8 In short, the Planning Commission hearing for the Project was premature; an EIR is required for the Project because substantial evidence supports a fair argument that that Project will cause: (1) a significant, unmitigated cancer risk from toxic air contaminant emissions, (2) a potentially significant, unmitigated impact from greenhouse gas emissions, (3) a significant, unmitigated impact from Noise, and (5) significant unmitigated impacts resulting from Cumulative Impacts; and the Planning Commission’s approval findings were not supported by substantial evidence.

A. The Planning Commission Hearing Was Premature
The Planning Commission hearing for the Project was premature and in violation of CEQA because the public comment period for the MND was still open at the time the hearing occurred and the Planning Commission did not review or consider all public comments before rendering a decision on the Project. The Planning Commission therefore did not have adequate opportunity to consider all public comments and correct the deficiencies in the City’s CEQA document before approving the Project, as required by CEQA.

CEQA requires the lead agency to receive and consider all public comments received on the MND.9 The purpose of the public comment period is to foster public participation.10 CEQA Guidelines § 15074(b) states:

Prior to approving a project, the decision-making body of the lead agency shall consider the proposed negative declaration or mitigated negative declaration together with any comments received during the public review process.

The decision-making body shall adopt the proposed negative declaration or mitigated negative declaration only if it finds on the basis of the whole record before it (including the initial study and any comments 7 See Exhibit 1: Letter from Kevin Carmichael to City of Fontana Planning Commission re:

Planning Commission Agenda Item PH-A: Fontana Square Project (Master Case No. 20-083); Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (January 17, 2023). 8 We reserve the right to supplement these comments at later hearings and proceedings on the Project. Gov. Code § 65009(b); PRC § 21177(a); Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. Bakersfield (2004) 124 Cal. App. 4th 1184, 1199-1203; see Galante Vineyards v. Monterey Water Dist. (1997) 60 Cal. App. 4th 1109, 1121.
9 14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15074(b).
10 14 Cal. Code Regs § 15201.
268
January 30, 2023

6452-011j
received), that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment and that the negative declaration or mitigated negative declaration reflects the lead agency's independent judgment and analysis.11
The Planning Commission is the decision maker for the Project’s entitlements, and was therefore the decision making body charged with considering public comments on the CEQA document before approving the Project.12 The January 17, 2023 Planning Commission hearing was held during the last day of the MND public comment period, and the Planning Commission’s decision was rendered before the close of the comment period, without reviewing or considering CARE CA’s MND comments and without allowing the public comment period to conclude.
13 The Commission therefore failed to consider all comments received on the MND before rendering a decision on the Project, and did not exercise independent judgement and analysis in approving the Project, as required by CEQA. The Planning Commission’s actions also thwarted meaningful participation by the public and the detailed consideration of the Project’s environmental impacts that CEQA requires.

CARE CA respectfully requests that the City Council set aside the Planning Commission’s premature decision to approve the Project, and require the City to prepare an EIR for the Project for the reasons set forth in CARE CA’s MND comments.

B. The Project May Cause a Significant, Unmitigated Cancer Risk from Toxic Air Contaminants Emissions
The MND concludes that the health risk posed to nearby sensitive receptors from exposure toxic air contaminants (“TAC”), including diesel particulate matter (“DPM”) emissions, from Project construction and operation would be less than 11 14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15074(b) (emphasis added).
12 Id.; FMC §§ 30-120, 30-150.
13 CARE CA’s MND comments were timely submitted on January 17, 2023. The Notice of Intent to adopt the MND set January 17, 2023, as the last day to submit comments on the MND, but did not set a cutoff time for submission, indicating that comments could be submitted anytime of the day or evening. The Planning Commission hearing was conducted at 6:00 p.m. during the last day of the public comment period. The hearing therefore occurred before the close of the MND public comment period. The Planning Commission did not review or respond to CARE CA’s comments before voting to approve the Project.
269
January 30, 2023

6452-011j
significant. CARE CA previously explained that the MND’s conclusion was unsupported because the City failed to quantify the risk and compare it to applicable thresholds of significance. CARE CA also provided substantial evidence that the Project would result in potentially significant health risks from vehicle emissions. To date, the City has failed to adequately address these concerns.

CARE CA’s expert provided substantial evidence supporting a fair argument that the Project emissions from DPM will result in significant cancer risks. Dr.

Clark found that the cumulative risk for exposure of residents during the 30 years of operation assuming the averaged DPM concentration of 0.039 ug/m3 is 33.8 in 1,000,000. Thus, the operational cancer risk stemming from the Project will exceed the 10 in one million threshold at several homes in the neighborhoods to the south of the Project site, resulting in a significant impact.

The Planning Commission’s decision to adopt the MND without requiring the City to prepare a quantitative health risk analysis (“HRA”) was a violation of CEQA’s disclosure requirements, and resulted in an unsupported conclusion that the Project’s health risk impacts would be less than significant.14 The City has not prepared an HRA and, as a result, has failed to disclose and analyze the Project’s significant health risks from operational emissions from passenger vehicles and construction DPM emissions from trucks and off-road heavy equipment.

The City Council should vacate the Planning Commission’s decision and require staff to prepare an EIR that includes a quantitative HRA to disclose and analyze the Project’s health risks from air pollutants, compare the risks to applicable thresholds of significance, and require mitigation for impacts that exceed thresholds.

C. The Project May Result in Significant, Unmitigated Health Risk Impacts from Disturbance of Contaminated Soils
CARE CA’s comments detail that the MND incorrectly concluded that the Project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment from the release of hazardous materials. Dr. Clark found that the Project site is within the fallout zone of the Kaiser Steel Mill, which blanketed the area with large 14 Sierra Club v. County of Fresno (2018) 6 Cal.5th 502, 518–522. The South Coast Air Quality Management District (“SCAQMD”) similarly recommends that HRAs be prepared for development projects subject to CEQA..
270
January 30, 2023

6452-011j
quantities of carcinogenic compounds that persist in the environment. The MND failed to include a Phase I or Phase II environmental site assessment (“ESA”) and failed to analyze the potential for soil contamination onsite. Soil will be disturbed during the Project’s excavation and construction phases. Disturbance of any residual, unmitigated contamination in the soil may present a significant public health risk to construction workers working on the Project, and the public nearby.

The Planning Commission lacked substantial evidence to adopt the MND’s unsupported conclusion that soil disturbance would result in a less than significant impact under CEQA.15 The City Council should vacate the Planning Commission’s decision and remand the Project to staff to prepare an EIR that analyzes the extent of soil contamination that will be released as a result of Project construction and provide adequate mitigation for potential exposure of workers and nearby residents.

D. The Project May Result in a Significant, Unmitigated Impact from Noise
CARE CA’s noise expert provided substantial evidence showing the MND’s omission of an existing residential receptor located at 15911 Highland Avenue invalidated the Project’s noise analysis. The MND failed to properly analyze the noise impacts from construction of the Project on all nearby sensitive receptors.

Mr. Watry explained that construction of Development B which will occur 39 feet from the residence and found that construction noise will exceed the FTA’s threshold of 80 dBA during the demolition, site preparation, grading and building construction phases of the Project without mitigation. This is the same threshold used in the MND to determine whether the Project will result in a significant impact.16 Therefore, the MND should have disclosed that Project construction will result in a significant noise impact on nearby sensitive receptors, and should have required mitigation to reduce this impact to less than significant levels, but failed to do so. Construction noise therefore remains a significant, unmitigated impact that the City failed to disclose.

The Planning Commission’s decision to adopt the MND and approve the Project with significant, unmitigated noise impacts was a failure to proceed in the manner required by law. The City Council should vacate the Commission’s decision 15 CBIA v. BAAQMD, 196 Cal.Rptr.3d 94, 105-106; 14 CCR § 15126.2(a). 16 MND, p. 156.
271
January 30, 2023

6452-011j
and require staff to prepare an EIR to accurately disclose the Project’s construction noise impacts in relation to the residence at 15911 Highland Avenue and propose additional mitigation to reduce the Project’s potentially significant noise impacts.

E. The Project May Result in Significant Unmitigated Public Safety Impacts
The MND contained inconsistent information about the severity of the Project’s public safety impacts. On the one hand, the MND stated, without support, that additional police services would not be necessary for the Project and that potential impacts on police protection due to implementation of the Project would therefore be less than significant.17 The MND later admitted that “Project buildout would consequently increase the demand for police protection services in the city.” 18 However, the MND failed to quantify the amount of additional police protection needed for the Project, and failed to substantiate its claim that the Project’s design and development impact fees will not require additional police resources.

For example, the MND’s metric of one police officer per 1000 residents does not address how police services are distributed to commercial uses like the Project.

Nor does the MND provide any discussion of how many officers currently use the existing police facilities in the City, or whether the additional police services needed by the Project will necessitate construction of new facilities to maintain the level of service necessary to serve existing uses plus the Project. The MND’s conclusion that the Project’s public services impacts would be less than significant was therefore not supported by substantial evidence, and the Planning Commission’s reliance on this finding was in error.

The City Council should vacate the Planning Commission’s approval and remand the Project to staff to prepare an EIR which includes a meaningful public services impacts analysis, and fully mitigates any potentially significant impacts resulting from development of the Project.
17 MND, p. 168.
18 MND, p. 168.
272
January 30, 2023

6452-011j
F. The Planning Commission Abused its Discretion by Approving the Project in Reliance on Unsupported Findings.

The Planning Commission’s findings that the Project complied with applicable land use codes was not supported by substantial evidence and should be vacated by the Council.

Pursuant to the City of FMC § 30-150, the City Planning Commission was required to make the following findings for approval of the Project’s conditional use permit applications:
(1) The proposed use is allowed within the applicable zoning district and complies with all other applicable provisions of the Zoning and Development Code, Municipal Code, general plan, any applicable specific plan or area plan, and City regulations/standards.
(2) The site is physically suited for the type, density, and intensity of the proposed use including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards.
(3) Granting the permit would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located.

CARE CA’s MND comments provided the City with substantial evidence demonstrating that the Project will conflict with finding number three. Specifically, the Project will result in significant air quality impacts during operations that would be detrimental to the health and safety of nearby residents. Additionally, the Project’s construction noise impacts on previously undisclosed nearby sensitive receptors will result in significant impacts. These impacts precluded the Planning Commission from making the findings required under the Code. 273
January 30, 2023

6452-011j
I. CONCLUSION
As a result of these errors, the City Planning Commission’s adoption of the MND, and the approval of Master Case No. 20-083 violated CEQA and must be overturned. We urge the City Council to grant our appeal and order the preparation of an EIR for the Project. Thank you for your attention to this important matter.

Sincerely,
Kevin Carmichael
KTC:ljl
274
EXHIBIT 1
275
6452-010j
KEVIN T. CARMICHAEL
CHRISTINA M. CARO
THOMAS A. ENSLOW
KELILAH D. FEDERMAN
RICHARD M. FRANCO
ANDREW J. GRAF
TANYA A. GULESSERIAN
RACHAEL E. KOSS
AIDAN P. MARSHALL
TARA C. RENGIFO
Of Counsel
MARC D. JOSEPH
DANIEL L. CARDOZO
.

SO. SAN FRANCISCO OFFICE
601 GATEWAY BLVD., SUITE 1000
SO. SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080
T E L : ( 6 5 0 ) 5 8 9 - 1 6 6 0
F A X : ( 6 5 0 ) 5 8 9 - 5 0 6 2

ADAMS BROADWELL JOSEPH & CARDOZO

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

A T T O RN E Y S A T L A W
5 2 0 C A P I T O L M A L L , S U I T E 3 5 0
S A C R A M E N T O , C A 95814 - 47 21
___________
T E L : ( 9 1 6 ) 4 4 4 - 6 2 0 1
F A X : ( 9 1 6 ) 4 4 4 - 6 2 0 9
k c a r m i c h a e l @ a d a m s b r o a d w e l l . c o m printed on recycled paper
January 17, 2023
Via Electronic Submission
Cathline Fort, Chair
Planning Commission
c/o Planning Department
City of Fontana
8353 Sierra Avenue
Fontana, CA 92335
Email: [email protected]
Salvador Quintanilla, Senior Planner
Planning Department
City of Fontana
8353 Sierra Avenue
Fontana, CA 92335
Email: [email protected]
Re: Planning Commission Agenda Item PH-A: Fontana Square Project (Master Case No. 20-083); Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
Dear Chair Fort, Commissioners and Mr. Quinanilla:

We are writing on behalf Californians Allied for a Responsible Economy (“CARE CA”) to provide comments to the Planning Commission on agenda item PHA1, the Fontana Square Project (“Project”), Master Case No. 20-083; Tentative Parcel Map No. 20464 (TPM No. 20-021); Conditional Use Permit No. 20-025; Conditional Use Permit No. 22-018; Conditional Use Permit No. 22-019; Conditional Use Permit No. 22-028; Design Review Project No. 20-031; Variance No. 22-001; and the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (“MND”) prepared by the City of Fontana (“City”) for the Project.2 The Project is proposed by Jinder Singh (“Applicant”).
1 City of Fontana, Planning Commission, Agenda Item PH-A (January 17, 2023) available at https://fontana.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=5990628&GUID=0B5964C3-BCB3-4F2D871B-39296A0756C7&Options=&Search= 2 City of Fontana, Fontana Square Project, Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (hereinafter “MND”) (December 2022) available at
https://www.fontana.org/DocumentCenter/View/40634/Fontana-Square-Project-Public-Draft-InitialStudy-Mitigated-Negative-Declaration 276
January 17, 2023

6452-010j
The Project is located at 16014 South Highland Avenue, south of State Route 210 (“SR 210”), north of South Highland Avenue, west of Catawba, and east of Citrus Avenue, in the City of Fontana assessor parcel numbers (“APN”) 0228-301-01 through -08, 0228-310- 20, -21, -22, -23, 0228-310-33 through -49, - 51, and 52.3 The Project proposes the construction of a banquet hall (“Development A”), a Holiday Inn Express Hotel & Suite and a Staybridge Suites (“Development B”), a convenience (“C-Store”)/Restaurant (“Development C”), and an In-N-Out Burger (“Development D”).4 The establishments would be generally located closer to the northern property boundary with most of the vehicle parking stalls along S.

Highland Avenue, Citrus Avenue.5 Parking is also provided throughout the site and between the various establishments.6
This hearing is premature and in violation of the California Environmental Quality Act7 (“CEQA”) because the public comment period for the MND is still ongoing and the MND fails to meet CEQA’s requirements to disclose and mitigate the Project’s potentially significant impacts. As discussed herein, based upon our preliminary review of the MND and supporting documentation, we conclude that the MND fails to comply with the requirements of CEQA. The MND fails to identify the Project’s potentially significant environmental impacts and fails to propose enforceable measures that can reduce those impacts to a less than significant level, as required by CEQA. Due to the MND’s inadequacies, there is more than a fair argument that the Project will result in potentially significant, unmitigated impacts relating to air quality, public health, GHG, noise, and public safety. The City may not approve the Project until it prepares an environmental impact report (“EIR”) that adequately analyzes the Project’s potentially significant direct, indirect and cumulative impacts, and incorporates all feasible mitigation measures to avoid or minimize these impacts.

As the decision maker for the Project’s entitlements,8 the Planning Commission has a duty to consider the Project’s CEQA document, together with any comments received during the public review process, before approving the Project.9 The Commission also has a duty to certify a legally adequate CEQA document for 3 MND, p. 4.
4 MND, p. 5.
5 MND, p. 5.
6 MND, p. 5.
7 Pub. Resources Code, §§ 21000 et seq.; 14 Cal. Code Regs. (“C.C.R”) §§ 15000 et seq. (“CEQA Guidelines”).
8 Fontana Municipal Code (“FMC”) §§ 30-120, 30-150.
9 14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15074(b).
277
January 17, 2023

6452-010j
the Project,10 and may not approve the Project’s other entitlements if the Project has significant, unmitigated environmental or public health and safety impacts.11 CARE CA urges the Planning Commission to continue this hearing to a later date to allow the Commission adequate time to consider public comments on the MND, and to prepare a legally adequate EIR for the Project.12
We prepared these comments with the assistance of air quality and hazards experts James Clark, Ph.D., of Clark and Associates, and Derek Watry of WilsonIhrig. Dr. Clark’s technical comments and curricula vitae are attached hereto as Attachment A.
13 Mr. Watry’s technical comments and curricula vitae are attached hereto as Attachment B.
14 I. STATEMENT OF INTEREST
CARE CA is an unincorporated association of individuals and labor organizations that may be adversely affected by the potential public and worker health and safety hazards, and the environmental impacts of the Project. The coalition includes Fontana residents Juan Devora, Albert Garcia, and Ruben Sanchez, the District Council of Ironworkers, Southern California Pipe Trades DC 16, along with their members, their families, and other individuals who live and work in and around the City of Fontana.

CARE CA advocates for protecting the environment and the health of their communities’ workforces. CARE CA seeks to ensure a sustainable construction industry over the long-term by supporting projects that offer genuine economic and employment benefits, and which minimize adverse environmental and other impacts on local communities. CARE CA members live, work, recreate, and raise their families in the City of Fontana and surrounding communities. Accordingly, they would be directly affected by the Project’s environmental and health and safety impacts. Individual members may also work on the Project itself. They will be first in line to be exposed to any health and safety hazards that exist onsite. 10 Pub. Resources Code §§ 21002;
11 See e.g. FMC § 30-150(3).
12 We reserve the right to supplement these comments at later hearings and proceedings on the Project. Gov. Code § 65009(b); Pub. Resources Code § 21177(a); Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. Bakersfield (“Bakersfield”) (2004) 124 Cal. App. 4th 1184, 1199-1203; see Galante Vineyards v. Monterey Water Dist. (1997) 60 Cal. App. 4th 1109, 1121. 13 Attachment A: Letter from James Clark (“Clark Comments”). 14 Attachment B: Letter from Derek Watry (“Watry Comments”) 278
January 17, 2023

6452-010j
In addition, CARE CA has an interest in enforcing environmental laws that encourage sustainable development and ensure a safe working environment for its members. Environmentally detrimental projects can jeopardize future jobs by making it more difficult and more expensive for business and industry to expand in the region, and by making the area less desirable for new businesses and new residents. Indeed, continued environmental degradation can, and has, caused construction moratoriums and other restrictions on growth that, in turn, reduce future employment opportunities.

II. THE PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING IS PREMATURE
This hearing is premature and in violation of CEQA because the public comment period for the MND is still open, and the Planning Commission will not have adequate opportunity to consider all public comments and correct the deficiencies in the City’s CEQA document before being asked to approve the Project.

CEQA requires the lead agency to receive and consider all public comments received on the MND.15 The purpose of the public comment period is to foster public participation.16 CEQA Guidelines § 15074(b) states:

Prior to approving a project, the decision-making body of the lead agency shall consider the proposed negative declaration or mitigated negative declaration together with any comments received during the public review process.

The decision-making body shall adopt the proposed negative declaration or mitigated negative declaration only if it finds on the basis of the whole record before it (including the initial study and any comments received), that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment and that the negative declaration or mitigated negative declaration reflects the lead agency's independent judgment and analysis.17
The Planning Commission is the decision maker for the Project’s entitlements, and is therefore the decision making body charged with considering public comments on the CEQA document before approving the Project. 18 Holding a
Planning Commission meeting to consider and approve the Project before the City has reviewed and responded to these comments on the MND would be a violation of 15 14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15074(b).
16 14 Cal. Code Regs § 15201.
17 14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15074(b) (emphasis added).
18 Id.; FMC §§ 30-120, 30-150.
279
January 17, 2023

6452-010j
CEQA. The Notice of Intent to adopt the MND does not set a cutoff time for submission of public comments on January 17, indicating that comments may be submitted anytime of the day or evening. The Planning Commission hearing is scheduled for 6:00 p.m. during the last day of the public comment period. The hearing therefore occurs before the close of the MND public comment period and may preclude the Planning Commission from considering all comments received on the MND and from exercising independent judgement and analysis in approving the Project, as required by CEQA.

The City must continue the Planning Commission hearing to a later date after the City has had an opportunity to evaluate these, and any other comments from the public on the MND. This would allow for meaningful participation by the public and the detailed consideration of the Project’s environmental impacts that CEQA requires.

III. THE CITY FAILED PROVIDE TIMELY ACCESS TO DOCUMENTS

INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE IN THE MND
The City violated CEQA and improperly truncated the MND public comment period by failing to make all documents referenced or relied on in the MND available for public review during the public comment period. As a result, CARE CA was unable to complete its review and analysis of the MND and its supporting evidence during the current public comment period. Our request for a further extension was not acknowledged by the City and therefore effectively denied.

CEQA requires that “all documents referenced in the… negative declaration are available for review” and readily accessible during the entire comment period.

The courts have held that the failure to provide even a few pages of a CEQA document for a portion of the CEQA public review period invalidates the entire CEQA process, and that such a failure must be remedied by permitting additional public comment.

On January 4, 2023, CARE CA submitted a letter to the City, pursuant to CEQA Section 21092(b)(1), requesting “immediate access to any and all documents referenced or relied upon” in the MND (emphasis added) (“CEQA Request”).19 Subsequently, on January 12, 2023 we submitted a request to extend the public review and comment period for the MND and identified specific MND 19 Letter from Adams, Broadwell, Joseph & Cardozo (“ABJC”) re Request for Immediate Access to Documents Referenced in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Fontana Square Project (January 4, 2023).
280
January 17, 2023

6452-010j
reference documents and records that were not released by the City with the MND, were not available online, and were not made available to CARE CA upon request.20 To date, the City has not responded to our request.

The courts have held that the failure to provide even a few pages of a CEQA documents for a portion of the CEQA review period invalidates the entire CEQA process, and that such a failure must be remedied by permitting additional public comment.21 It is also well settled that an MND may not rely on hidden studies or documents that are not provided to the public.22 By failing to make all documents referenced in the MND “readily available” during the current comment period, the City has violated the clear procedural mandates of CEQA, to the detriment of CARE CA and other members of the public who wish to meaningfully review and comment on the MND.

We request that the City provide CARE CA with immediate access to all MND reference documents that are not currently available on its website, and restart the public comment period for the MND once access to the documents has been provided. We reserve our right to submit supplemental comments on the MND and the Project at a future date following our review of these documents.

IV. AN EIR IS REQUIRED
CEQA requires that lead agencies analyze any project with potentially significant environmental impacts in an EIR. “Its purpose is to inform the public and its responsible officials of the environmental consequences of their decisions before they are made. Thus, the EIR protects not only the environment, but also informed self-government.” The EIR has been described as “an environmental ‘alarm bell’ whose purpose it is to alert the public and its responsible officials to environmental changes before they have reached ecological points of no return.” CEQA’s purpose and goals must be met through the preparation of an EIR, except in certain limited circumstances. CEQA contains a strong presumption in favor of requiring a lead agency to prepare an EIR. This presumption is reflected in the “fair argument” standard. Under that standard, a lead agency “shall” prepare 20 Letter from ABJC re Request to Extend the Public Review and Comment Period for the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Continue the Planning Commission Hearing – Fontana Square Project (Master Case No. 20-083) (January 12, 2023).
21 Ultramar v. South Coast Air Quality Man. Dist. (1993) 17 Cal.App.4th 689, 699. 22 Santiago County Water District v. County of Orange (1981) 118 Cal.App.3rd 818, 831 (“Whatever is required to be considered in an EIR must be in that formal report; what any official might have known from other writings or oral presentations cannot supply what is lacking in the report.”). 281
January 17, 2023

6452-010j
an EIR whenever substantial evidence in the whole record before the agency supports a fair argument that a project may have a significant effect on the environment.

In contrast, a mitigated negative declaration may be prepared only when, after preparing an initial study, a lead agency determines that a project may have a significant effect on the environment, but: (1) revisions in the project plans or proposals made by, or agreed to by, the applicant before the proposed negative declaration and initial study are released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effect on the environment would occur, and (2) there is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record before the public agency that the project, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment.

Courts have held that if “no EIR has been prepared for a nonexempt project, but substantial evidence in the record supports a fair argument that the project may result in significant adverse impacts, the proper remedy is to order preparation of an EIR.” The fair argument standard creates a “low threshold” favoring environmental review through an EIR, rather than through issuance of a negative declaration. An agency’s decision not to require an EIR can be upheld only when there is no credible evidence to the contrary.
“Substantial evidence” required to support a fair argument is defined as “enough relevant information and reasonable inferences from this information that a fair argument can be made to support a conclusion, even though other conclusions might also be reached.” According to the CEQA Guidelines, when determining whether an EIR is required, the lead agency is required to apply the principles set forth in Section 15064, subdivision (f):
[I]n marginal cases where it is not clear whether there is substantial evidence that a project may have a significant effect on the environment, the lead agency shall be guided by the following principle: If there is disagreement among expert opinion supported by facts over the significance of an effect on the environment, the Lead Agency shall treat the effect as significant and shall prepare an EIR.

Furthermore, CEQA documents, including EIRs and MNDs, must mitigate significant impacts through measures that are “fully enforceable through permit conditions, agreements, or other legally binding instruments.” Deferring formulation of mitigation measures to post-approval studies is generally impermissible. Mitigation measures adopted after Project approval deny the public 282
January 17, 2023

6452-010j
the opportunity to comment on the Project as modified to mitigate impacts. If identification of specific mitigation measures is impractical until a later stage in the Project, specific performance criteria must be articulated and further approvals must be made contingent upon meeting these performance criteria. Courts have held that simply requiring a project applicant to obtain a future report and then comply with the report’s recommendations is insufficient to meet the standard for properly deferred mitigation.

With respect to this Project, the MND fails to satisfy the basic purposes of CEQA. The City failed to adequately investigate, analyze, and disclose the Project’s potentially significant air quality, health risk, health hazards and noise impacts.

Therefore, the City’s conclusions that the Project will have less than significant air quality, public health and noise impacts are unsupported. Whereas the City lacks substantial evidence to support its conclusions, Dr. Clark and Mr. Watry provide substantial evidence that the Project may result in potentially significant public health, air quality and noise impacts from construction and operation. Therefore, there is a fair argument the Project may cause significant impacts requiring the preparation of an EIR.

V. THE MND FAILS TO INCLUDE A COMPLETE PROJECT

DESCRIPTION
The MND does not meet CEQA’s requirements because it fails to include a complete project description, rendering the entire analysis inadequate. Without a complete project description, the environmental analysis under CEQA will be impermissibly narrow, thus minimizing the Project’s impacts and undercutting public review.23
CEQA places the burden of environmental investigation on the lead agency rather than the public. Accordingly, a lead agency may not hide behind its failure to obtain a complete and accurate project description.24 CEQA Guidelines Section 15071 requires that an MND accurately describe the project and its location and boundaries.
25 California courts have repeatedly held that “an accurate, stable and finite project description is the sine qua non of an informative and legally sufficient [CEQA document].”26 In contrast, an inaccurate or incomplete project description renders the analysis of environmental impacts inherently unreliable. Without a 23 See, e.g., Laurel Heights Improvement Assn. v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal. (1988) 47 Cal.3d 376. 24 Sundstrom v. County of Mendocino (1988) 202 Cal.App.3d 296, 311. 25 14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15071(a), (b) (hereafter “CEQA Guidelines”). 26 County of Inyo v. City of Los Angeles (3d Dist. 1977) 71 Cal.App.3d 185, 193. 283
January 17, 2023

6452-010j
complete project description, the environmental analysis under CEQA will be impermissibly narrow, thus minimizing the project’s impacts and undercutting public review.27
A. The MND Fails to Identify All Nearby Sensitive Receptors The MND states that the nearest sensitive receptors to the Project site are the single-family residences located 105 feet (32 meters) to the south of the Project on the opposite side of South Highland Avenue.28 This is incorrect. The MND fails to identify a residence located immediately adjacent to the Project site above the Sunrise Market located at 15911 Highland Avenue. A listing for sale on Loopnet.com states that the property at 15911 Highland Avenue includes a threebedroom apartment above the convenience store.29 The City’s failure to identify sensitive receptors residing at this location results in a failure to identify noise and air quality impacts on the closest residents to the Project site. The City must prepare an EIR that identifies all nearby sensitive receptors and properly analyzes the Project’s potential impacts.

VI. THE MND LACKS SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE TO CONCLUDE
THAT THE PROJECT’S HEALTH RISK IMPACTS WOULD BE

LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT AND SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

SUPPORTS A FAIR ARGUMENT THAT IMPACTS ARE

SIGNIFICANT AND UNMITIGATED
The MND’s conclusion that the Project’s construction and operational public health impacts from toxic air contaminant (“TAC”) emissions are less than significant with mitigation is not based on substantial evidence, as required by CEQA.30
First, the MND fails to quantify the Project’s construction health risk, as required by CEQA, and relies on irrelevant significance thresholds. As a result, the MND lacks supporting evidence for its conclusion that the health risk posed to nearby sensitive receptors from exposure to TAC’s released during Project construction would be less than significant.
27 See, e.g., Laurel Heights Improvement Association v. Regents of the University of California (1988) 47 Cal.3d 376.
28 MND, p. 73.
29 https://www.loopnet.com/Listing/15911-Highland-Ave-Fontana-CA/17451352/ 30 CEQA Guidelines § 15384(a).
284
January 17, 2023

6452-010j
Second, there is substantial evidence supporting a fair argument that the Project’s operational health risk is significant and unmitigated. Dr. Clark reviewed the MND and found that the MND underestimates the Project’s emissions of TACs, including hazardous air pollutants (“HAPs”).
31 Dr. Clark’s corrected analysis of the
Project’s operational air emissions demonstrates that the Project may result in significant undisclosed health risk impacts. The City must prepare an EIR to analyze and mitigate these potentially significant impacts, as required by law.

A. The MND Fails to Disclose and Analyze Potentially Significant Construction Air Quality Health Risks
The MND fails to provide support for the finding that the Project’s potential construction health risks are less than significant because the MND fails to quantify the health risk posed by the Project’s construction-related TAC emissions on nearby sensitive receptors. The MND also relies on an irrelevant significant threshold which addresses criteria pollutant emissions and lacks a threshold for assessing cancer risk posed by TAC exposure.

The MND states that “the maximum daily emissions of pollutants during each phase of construction would not result in significant concentrations of pollutants at nearby sensitive receptors. Significant impacts would not occur concerning LSTs [localized significance thresholds] during construction.” 32 Dr. Clark
explains that LSTs are appropriate when determining whether a Project will generate criteria air pollutants in excess of established thresholds.33 However, LSTs are not appropriate to determine the Project’s TAC emissions.34 As he explains, there are no LSTs for TACs, instead, the determination of risk from TACs must be based on a quantitative risk analysis of the Project’s emissions.35 The MND therefore fails to provide any analysis or substantial evidence justifying the finding of no construction health risk impact from TACs.
36 Dr. Clark explains that TACs, including diesel particulate matter (“DPM”) which is a common construction-related air pollutant, contribute to a host of respiratory impacts and may lead to the development of various cancers and that 31 See Cal. Health & Safety Code §§ 39655, 39657(b) (substances which have been listed as federal hazardous air pollutants pursuant to section 7412 of Title 42 of the United States Code are TACs under California’s air toxics program).
32 MND, p. 75.
33 Clark Comments, p. 7.
34 Clark Comments, p. 7.
35 Clark Comments, p. 7.
36 Kings County Farm Bureau v. City of Hanford (1990) 221 Cal.App.3d 692, 732. 285
January 17, 2023

6452-010j
brief exposures to the TACs could lead to the development of adverse health impacts over the life of an individual.37 Because DPM is a TAC, it is a different air pollutant than criteria particulate matter emissions evaluated in the LSTs, such as PM10, PM2.5, and fugitive dust.38
A lead agency’s significance determination must be supported by accurate scientific and factual data.39 An agency cannot conclude that an impact is less than significant unless it produces rigorous analysis and concrete substantial evidence justifying the finding.40
These standards apply to an agency’s analysis of public health impacts of a project under CEQA. In Sierra Club v. County of Fresno, the California Supreme Court affirmed CEQA’s mandate to protect public health and safety by holding that an EIR fails as an informational document when it fails to disclose the public health impacts from air pollutants that would be generated by a development project.41 In Sierra Club, the Supreme Court held that the EIR for the Friant Ranch Project—a 942-acre master-planned, mixed-use development with 2,500 senior residential units, 250,000 square feet of commercial space, and open space on former agricultural land in north central Fresno County—was deficient as a matter of law in its informational discussion of air quality impacts as they connect to adverse human health effects.42 As the Court explained, “a sufficient discussion of significant impacts requires not merely a determination of whether an impact is significant, but some effort to explain the nature and magnitude of the impact.”43 The Court concluded that the County’s EIR was inadequate for failing to disclose the nature and extent of public health impacts caused by the project’s air pollution. 37 Clark Comments, p. 7.
38 Clark Comments, p. 7.
39 14 C.C.R. § 15064(b).
40 Kings County Farm Bureau, 221 Cal.App.3d at 732.
41 Sierra Club, 6 Cal.5th at 518–522.
42 Id. at 507–508, 518–522.
43 Id. at 519, citing Cleveland National Forest Foundation v. San Diego Assn. of Governments (2017) 3 Cal.5th 497, 514–515.
286
January 17, 2023

6452-010j
As the Court explained, the EIR failed to comply with CEQA because after reading the EIR, “the public would have no idea of the health consequences that result when more pollutants are added to a nonattainment basin.”44 CEQA mandates discussion, supported by substantial evidence, of the nature and magnitude of impacts of air pollution on public health.45
Furthermore, in Berkeley Jets, the Court of Appeal held that a CEQA document must analyze the impacts from human exposure to toxic substances.46 In that case, the Port of Oakland approved a development plan for the Oakland International Airport.47 The EIR admitted that the Project would result in an increase in the release of toxic air contaminants (“TACs”) and adopted mitigation measures to reduce TAC emissions, but failed to quantify the severity of the Project’s impacts on human health.48 The Court held that mitigation alone was insufficient, and that the Port had a duty to analyze the health risks associated with exposure to TACs.49 As the CEQA Guidelines explain, “[t]he EIR serves not only to protect the environment but also to demonstrate to the public that it is being protected.”50
Just as the Port of Oakland in Berkeley Jets could not get away with its failure to quantify the severity of the impacts of TACs on human health, the City here cannot neglect to fully and accurately analyze the impacts of this Project’s emissions on the health of nearby receptors.51 The City here did not even acknowledge the significance of these emissions or attempt to mitigate them, meaning that the City here has committed an even more egregious violation of CEQA.52
44 Id. at 518. CEQA’s statutory scheme and legislative intent also include an express mandate that agencies analyze human health impacts and determine whether the “environmental effects of a project will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly.” (Public Resources Code § 21083(b)(3) (emphasis added).) Moreover, CEQA directs agencies to “take immediate steps to identify any critical thresholds for the health and safety of the people of the state and take all coordinated actions necessary to prevent such thresholds being reached.” (Public Resources Code § 21000(d) (emphasis added).) 45 Sierra Club, 6 Cal.5th at 518–522.
46 Berkeley Jets, 91 Cal.App.4th at 1369–1371.
47 Id. at 1349–1350.
48 Id. at 1364–1371.
49 Id.
50 14 C.C.R. § 15003(b).
51 Berkeley Jets, 91 Cal.App.4th at 1364–1371.
52 Id.
287
January 17, 2023

6452-010j
The Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment’s (“OEHHA”) risk assessment guidelines are also instructive because they recommend a formal health risk assessment (quantitative health risk analysis) for short-term construction exposures lasting longer than two months, and recommend that exposures from projects lasting more than six months should be evaluated for the duration of the project.53 Health risk assessments are commonly conducted to determine if a Project’s construction HAP emissions would cause a significant health impact.54 The health risk assessment quantifies pollutants other than conventional air quality pollutants, that is, other than ROG, NOx, PM10, PM2.5, CO, and SO2. 55 Construction equipment emits DPM, which is a TAC/HAP and potent carcinogen.56 According to the MND, construction of the Project will last for up to 18 months.57 Human exposure to construction TACs during that time period may result in a significant, increased cancer risk which the MND fails to assess.58 This time period also exceeds OEHHA’s health-based recommended two-month threshold to prepare a health risk assessment for the construction phase of the Project.

The City must prepare a detailed health risk analysis (“HRA”) for Project construction and present the results of its analysis in an EIR. If the resulting cancer risk exceeds applicable thresholds of significance, additional mitigation must be required.
53 Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (“OEHHA”), Risk Assessment Guidelines:

Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments, February 2015 (“OEHHA 2015”), Section 8.2.10: Cancer Risk Evaluation of Short Term Projects, pp. 8-17/18, available at https://oehha.ca.gov/air/crnr/notice-adoption-air-toxics-hot-spots-program-guidance-manualpreparation-health-risk-0. 54 Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA), Risk Assessment Guidelines:

Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessment, February 2015; https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf. 55 Clark Comments, p. 7.
56 Cal/EPA OEHHA and American Lung Association of California, Health Effects of Diesel Exhaust; https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/calenviroscreen/indicators/diesel4-02.pdf. See also OEHHA, Appendix A: Hot Spots Unit Risk and Cancer Potency Values, p. 1 (DPM unit risk = 3 E-4); https://oehha.ca.gov/media/CPFs042909.pdf and OEHHA, Diesel Exhaust Particulate; https://oehha.ca.gov/chemicals/diesel-exhaust-particulate#:~:text=Cancer %20Potency%20Information&text=Listed%20as%20Particulate%20Emissions%20from,(ug%2Fm3)% 2D1.
57 MND, p. 70.
58 Clark Comments, p. 6.
288
January 17, 2023

6452-010j
B. The Project’s Operational Cancer Risk from Vehicle Exhaust is Significant
The MND lacks an operational HRA for the Project, thereby depriving decisionmakers from determining whether the Project will result in a significant health risk to nearby sensitive receptors. Dr. Clark prepared a screening level analysis of the Project’s operational cancer risk and determined that the Project will exceed the SCAQMD threshold of significance for cancer risk, which finds a significant impact for an incremental increase in cancer risk greater than 10 in one million at any off-site receptor.59 Dr. Clark’s analysis provides substantial evidence supporting a fair argument that the Project has a significant, unmitigated operational health risk.

Dr. Clark modeled the Project’s emissions using OEHHA’s HARP 2 Standalone Risk software and found that the cumulative risk for exposure of residents during the 30 years of operation assuming the averaged DPM concentration of 0.039 ug/m3 is 33.8 in 1,000,000.
60 Dr. Clark’s findings show that
the operational cancer risk stemming from the Project will exceed the 10 in one million threshold at several homes in the neighborhoods to the south of the Project site, resulting in a significant impact.
61 When an impact exceeds an established
significance threshold, the agency must disclose in the CEQA document that the impact is significant.62 The MND fails to disclose this significant health impact, in violation of CEQA.

Dr. Clark explains that the increased cancer risk from Project operation mainly comes from exhaust emissions from vehicles moving through the Project site which the MND’s air quality analysis failed to analyze in an HRA.63 Dr. Clark used meteorological data from SCAQMD for the Fontana monitoring station and modeled the concentrations of Project generated exhaust at the homes south of the Project Site. Figure 1 below shows the resulting concentration of exhaust emissions from the Project.
59 SCAQMD Thresholds of Significance Table; http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/defaultsource/ceqa/handbook/scaqmd-air-quality-significance-thresholds.pdf 60 Clark Comments, p. 12.
61 Clark Comments, p. 12.
62 CBE v. CRA, 103 Cal.App.4th at 110-111; Schenck v. County of Sonoma (2011) 198 Cal.App.4th 949, 960; CBE v. SCAQMD, 48 Cal.4th at 327 (impact is significant because exceeds “established significance threshold for NOx … constitute[ing] substantial evidence supporting a fair argument for a significant adverse impact”).
63 Clark Comments, p. 12.
289
January 17, 2023

6452-010j
Figure 1: Annual Project Exhaust Concentration
The City must perform an HRA for Project construction and operation, disclose health risk impacts which exceed applicable thresholds, and mitigate the Project’s significant health risk impacts in an EIR.

VII. THE MND LACKS SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE TO CONCLUDE

THAT THE PROJECT WOULD HAVE LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT

HAZARDOUS MATEIRALS AND PUBLIC HEALTH IMPACTS

FROM DISTURBANCE OF CONTAMINATED SOIL
A. The MND Fails to Analyze the Impacts from Disturbance of Potential Contamination from the Kaiser Steel Mill
The MND states that the Project will not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials.64 However, the MND fails to disclose the extent of existing soil contamination at the Project site, and fails to analyze the impacts of disturbing contamination during Project construction. 64 MND, pp. 131-132.
290
January 17, 2023

6452-010j
The Project site is located approximately 3.4 miles to the northeast of the original Kaiser Steel Mill (“KSM”), located on approximately 1,200 acres in Fontana.65 The KSM was an integrated steel production plant that the Kaiser Steel Corporation owned and operated from approximately 1942 to 1983.66 Studies of the steel mill found that it emitted large quantities of carcinogenic compounds that will persist in the environment and that the emission controls on the plant were deficient.67 Dr. Clark states that emissions of arsenic, cadmium, and polycyclic organic matter, which are not subject to degradation in the environment, would have covered the area of the Project site and present a recognized environmental concern (“REC”) for the Project site.

In Cal. Building Industry Ass’n v. Bay Area Air Quality Mgmt. Dist., 68 the
California Supreme Court held that the disturbance of contaminated soil is a potentially significant impact which requires disclosure and analysis of health and safety impacts in an EIR.69 The Court explained that “when a proposed project risks exacerbating those environmental hazards or conditions that already exist, an agency must analyze the potential impact of such hazards on future residents or users.”70
Dr. Clark’s comments provide substantial evidence that carcinogenic compounds including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, arsenic, cadmium, and benzene may be found on the Project site.71 The MND failed to include a Phase I or Phase II environmental site assessment (“ESA”) and failed to analyze the potential for soil contamination onsite. Soil will be disturbed during the Project’s excavation and construction phases. Disturbance of any residual, unmitigated contamination in the soil may present a significant public health risk to construction workers working on the Project, and the public nearby.72 The City lacks substantial evidence to support the MND’s conclusion that soil disturbance would result in a less than significant impact under CEQA.73
The City must fully analyze and mitigate the potential health and safety risks arising from disturbing contaminants in the soil on the Project site. Dr. Clark 65 Clark Comments, p. 13.
66 Clark Comments, p. 13.
67 Clark Comments, pp. 13-14.
68 (2015) 62 Cal.4th 369.
69 Cal. Building Industry Ass’n v. Bay Area Air Quality Mgmt. Dist. (“CBIA v. BAAQMD”) (2015) 196 Cal.Rptr.3d 94 at 105-106; 14 CCR § 15126.2(a).
70 Id. at 377.
71 Clark Comments, p. 14.
72 Clark Comments, p. 15.
73 CBIA v. BAAQMD, 196 Cal.Rptr.3d 94 at 105-106; 14 CCR § 15126.2(a). 291
January 17, 2023

6452-010j
recommends that the City prepare a Phase II subsurface investigation to analyze potential soil contamination at the Project site.74 The City must also calculate the potential health risks associated with the exposure of nearby residents to disturbed soil and provide adequate mitigation for such exposure. The City must present the results of these studies in an EIR.

VIII. THE MND LACKS SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE TO CONCLUDE
THAT THE PROJECT’S GHG IMPACTS ARE LESS THAN

SIGNIFICANT
A. The MND’s Mitigation of GHG Impacts is Nonbinding and Improperly Deferred
The MND concludes that the Project’s GHG impacts will be significant without mitigation.
75 To reduce Project GHG emissions, the MND relies in part on reductions in mobile source emissions through implementation of a transportation demand management (“TDM”) program that would be implemented as part of the occupancy permits for future tenants, as noted in MM GHG-3. 76 MM GHG-3
provides:

Prior to issuance of occupancy permits, the Project operator shall prepare and submit a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) program detailing strategies that would reduce the use of single occupant vehicles by employees by increasing the number of trips by walking, bicycle, carpool, vanpool, and transit. The TDM shall include, but is not limited to the following:
• Carpooling encouragement
• Ride-matching assistance
• Preferential carpool parking
• Flexible work schedules for carpools
• Half time transportation coordinator
• Vanpool assistance
• Promote bicycling and walking through design features such as secure bicycle storage, showers for employees, lockers, etc. around the project site.

MM GHG-3 is nonbinding and improperly deferred.
74 Clark Comments, p. 15.
75 MND, p. 122.
76 MND, p. 122.
292
January 17, 2023

6452-010j
In City of Hayward v. Board of Trustees of the California State University, 77 the court considered whether a project’s TDM program constituted improperly deferred mitigation. The project was a master plan to guide development of a college campus for the next 20–30 years. The master plan anticipated a significant increase in traffic and parking demand. Because the master plan covered a long-range development program and was based on projections of growth that may or may not occur, the lead agency fashioned mitigation that would allow it to retain the flexibility to select specific mitigation measures in the future. The EIR consequently designated, as mitigation measure “TRANS 1a,” the requirement that the lead agency “prepare a comprehensive TDM Implementation Plan that includes steps necessary to plan for, fund, implement, and monitor the effectiveness of the measures outlined in the Master Plan TDM section.”78 The TDM incorporated in the EIR detailed a range of sustainable transit policies that can be utilized to reduce single-occupancy. The TDM set minimum performance goals of reducing the percentage of single driver vehicle trips onto campus from the existing 79 percent to 64 percent, and increasing present transit use by 50 percent. The TDM also included a detailed monitoring program. The EIR concluded that while implementation of these mitigation measures will reduce the level of significance, the traffic and parking impacts will remain significant and unavoidable.

The court held that the TDM program was not improperly deferred, because the lead agency committed to perform the feasible mitigation measures included in the TDM:

While the Trustees have not committed to implementation of any particular measure that is specified in the TDM plan, the TDM is not illusory. The plan enumerates specific measures to be evaluated, it incorporates quantitative criteria and it sets specific deadlines for completion of the parking and traffic study and timelines for reporting to the city on the implementation and effectiveness of the measures that will be studied. The monitoring program which is an integral part of the plan ensures that the public will have access to the information necessary to evaluate compliance with the Trustees' obligations.

Although City of Hayward addressed the efficacy of a TDM program to mitigate traffic impacts, rather than GHG impacts, the court’s analysis of what do, and do not, constitute adequate performance standards for a TDM program is instructive on the MND’s failure to include adequate performance standards in MM 77 (2012) 143 Cal.Rptr.3d 265.
78 143 Cal.Rptr.3d 265, 282
293
January 17, 2023

6452-010j
GHG-3 to ensure that the Project’s mobile source GHG emissions would be reduced to the extent claimed in the MND. While this Project is similar to the project in Hayward in that (1) it is a long-term development, (2) the mitigation measure allows for flexibility in selecting TDM measures due to the uncertainty of future development, MM GHG-3 lacks the quantitative criteria and monitoring program of the project in Hayward. For example, the project in Hayward required a monitoring program to conduct periodic traffic counts at the primary gateways ... to monitor the effectiveness of new TDM programs as they are implemented. 79 Without
performance standards to measure the effectiveness of the TDM program for this Project the mitigation is nonbinding, results in improperly deferred GHG mitigation, and as such, does not support the MND’s GHG reduction calculations.

Despite the illusory nature of MM GHG-3, the MND concludes that with implementation of the mitigation measure, Project GHG emissions from mobile sources will be reduced from 2,273.79 MTCO2E per year to 1,883.31 MTCO2E, bringing the Project’s total GHG emissions to 2,885.60 MTCO2E per year, just under SCAQMD’s screening threshold of 3,000 MTCO2E per year for non-industrial projects.80 The MND’s GHG appendix does not provide support for the claim that MM GHG-3 will actually reduce the Project’s GHG emissions under SCAQMD threshold, instead, the reductions in mobile source emissions are based on the TDM program that is yet to be created without explanation of how the results were calculated.

The City must prepare an EIR that includes additional enforceable mitigation measures to reduce the Project’s GHG emissions from mobile sources.

B. The MND Improperly Relies on MM GHG-2 to Reduce the
Project’s GHG Impacts
The MND states that, with mitigation, the Project will have negative GHG emissions from on-site generation of renewable energy.81 Specifically, the MND states that through the implementation of MM GHG-2, the Project will emit -669.87 MTCO2E per year. However, MM GHG-2 does not require the installation of solar panels or other renewable energy generation at the Project site. Therefore, the MND’s analysis of the Project’s mitigated emissions takes credit for renewable energy generation that is not required under the MND. MM GHG-2 states:
79 143 Cal.Rptr.3d 265, 282
80 MND, Appendix D, p. 22.
81 MND, p. 121.
294
January 17, 2023

6452-010j
The project shall install solar photovoltaic (PV) panels or other source of renewable energy generation on-site, or otherwise acquire energy from the local utility that has been generated by renewable sources (for example, Southern California Edison Green Rate), that would provide 100 percent of the expected building load. The building shall include an electrical system and other infrastructure sufficiently sized to accommodate the PV arrays. The electrical system and infrastructure must be clearly labeled with noticeable and permanent signage.82
MM GHG-2 allows the Project to acquire energy from a local utility that has been generated by renewable sources in lieu of installing solar PV arrays. As a result, the MND cannot take on-site energy generation into account to reduce the Project’s expected GHG emissions. Like the reductions taken under MM GHG-3 noted above, the MND improperly relies on MM GHG-2 to reduce the Project’s GHG emissions to 2,885.60 MTCO2E per year, such that the Project falls under SCAQMD’s screening threshold of 3,000 MTCO2E per year. The Project will result in a significant GHG impact if solar panels are not used at the Project. Because there are no binding mitigation measures requiring solar panels at the Project, the Project will result in a significant GHG emissions impact.

The City must prepare an EIR that accurately analyzes the Project’s GHG emissions and implement enforceable mitigation measures to reduce the Project’s significant GHG emissions.

IX. SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE SUPPORTS A FAIR ARGUMENT

THAT THE PROJECT MAY RESULT IN POTENTIALLY

SIGNIFICANT NOISE IMPACTS
A. The Project May Result in Significant, Unmitigated
Construction Noise Impacts
The MND states that Project construction will not result in significant noise impacts to sensitive receptors. However, as explained above, the MND fails to identify a residential apartment located at 15911 Highland Avenue. According to Mr. Watry, when this additional sensitive receptor is considered, Project construction will result in a significant noise impact. 82 MND, p. 122 (emphasis added).
295
January 17, 2023

6452-010j
Mr. Watry calculated the noise that will be generated by construction of Development B which will occur 39 feet from the apartment and found that noise will exceed the FTA’s threshold of 80 dBA during the demolition, site preparation, grading and building construction phases of the Project without mitigation.83 This is the same threshold used in the MND to determine whether the Project will result in a significant impact.84 Therefore, Project construction will result in a significant noise impact on nearby sensitive receptors.

The City must reanalyze the Project’s construction noise impacts in relation to the residence at 15911 Highland Avenue and propose additional mitigation to reduce the Project’s potentially significant noise impacts.

X. THE MND LACKS SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE TO CONCLUDE
THAT THE PROJECT’S PUBLIC SERVICES IMPACTS WOULD BE

LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT
A. The Project May Require New or Physically Altered Police Protection Facilities
The Project proposes to construct a banquet hall, a dual branded hotel (Holiday Inn Express / a Staybridge Suites), a Restaurant, and an In-N-Out Burger which will bring hundreds of commercial users to the site on a daily basis.

The MND states that the additional police services are not necessary and potential impacts on police protection due to implementation of the Project would be less than significant.
85 The rationale for this conclusion is based on the fact that the Fontana Police Department maintains an approximate ratio of 1 officer to 1,000 City residents, that the Project will be designed with Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (“CPTED”) principles, and that development impact fees from the Project will fund continued FPD operations.

However, while the MND admits that “Project buildout would consequently increase the demand for police protection services in the city” it fails to quantify the amount of additional police protection needed for the Project, and fails to substantiate its claim that the Project’s design and development impact fees will not require additional police resources.
86 The MND’s metric of one police officer per
83 Watry Comments, p. 5.
84 MND, p. 156.
85 MND, p. 168.
86 MND, p. 168.
296
January 17, 2023

6452-010j
1000 residents does not address how police services are distributed to commercial uses like the project, nor does the MND provide any discussion of how many officers currently use the existing police facilities in the City or if the additional police services needed by the Project will necessitate construction of facilities to maintain the level of service necessary. The MND therefore lacks any evidence to support its erroneous conclusion that the Project will not require an increase in police protection facilities within the City.

Furthermore, there is is substantial evidence demonstrating that In-N-Out restaurants experience serious crime that requires police intervention, including violent crimes, murder, robberies, and armed police standoffs requiring multipleofficer responses and specially trained crime dogs.87 The City must revise the public services impacts analysis in an EIR and provide analysis of the impacts resulting from development of the Project.

XI. THE CITY LACKS SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE TO APPROVE THE
PROJECT’S LAND USE ENTITLEMENTS
The Project requires several discretionary entitlements and related approvals under local City plans and codes, including:
• Tentative Parcel Map No. 20464 (TPM No. 20-021) - to consolidate 31 parcels (APNs: 0228-301-01 through -08, 0228-310-20, -21, -22, -23, 0228- 310-33 through -49, -51, and 52) and vacate a portion of Highland Avenue into four parcels totaling 8.9 adjusted gross acres for the development of a commercial retail center.
• Variance No. 22-001 - to reduce the rear yard landscape setback abutting a freeway from 25 feet to a minimum of two (2) feet in certain locations at the rear of the project site.
• Conditional Use Permit No. 20-025 - to establish a dual branded hotel consisting of a 5- story, 75 room hotel (Holiday Inn Express) and a 5-story, 109 room hotel (Staybridge Suites Hotel) with various amenities. • Conditional Use Permit No. 22-019 - to operate a State of California Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC) license type 47 (On-Sale General - Eating Place) for the place of assembly (banquet hall).
87 See Attachment C, 2017-2019 news articles re crime at California In-N-Out restaurants. 297
January 17, 2023

6452-010j
• Conditional Use Permit No. 22-028 - to operate a place of assembly (banquet hall) within the Fontana Square commercial retail center. • Design Review No. 20-031 - for the site and architectural review for the development of commercial retail center including a banquet hall, two hotels, a sit down restaurant/retail, and an In-N-Out drive-through restaurant on an approximately 8.9 adjusted gross acre site located within General Commercial (C-2) Zoning District.88
Each permit requires the City to make findings regarding land use consistencies and/or environmental factors. As discussed herein, there is substantial evidence supporting a fair argument that the Project has potentially significant, unmitigated impacts on air quality, GHG, noise and public services, that the MND fails to accurately disclose and fails to mitigate to less than significant levels. These unmitigated impacts create inconsistencies with several of the permits required for the Project.

Where a local or regional policy of general applicability, such as an ordinance, is adopted in order to avoid or mitigate environmental effects, a conflict with that policy constitutes a significant land use impact and, in itself, indicates a potentially significant impact on the environment.89 Any inconsistencies between a proposed project and applicable plans must be discussed in an EIR.90 A project’s inconsistencies with local plans and policies also constitute significant impacts under CEQA.91 The City must circulate an EIR to adequately disclose and mitigate the significant land use impacts discussed below.

Pursuant to the City of FMC § 30-150, the City Planning Commission must make the following findings for approval of the Project’s conditional use permit applications:
88 Planning Commission Agenda Item PH-A, Attachment No. 6 - Planning Commission Resolution, Findings, and Conditions of Approval (January 17, 2023) available at https://fontana.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=F&ID=11564406&GUID=FF156A23-37E6-4700-A9E5- D8232364216A
89 See, Pocket Protectors v. Sacramento (2005) 124 Cal.App.4th 903. 90 14 CCR § 15125(d); City of Long Beach v. Los Angeles Unif. School Dist. (2009) 176 Cal. App. 4th 889, 918; Friends of the Eel River v. Sonoma County Water Agency (2003) 108 Cal. App. 4th 859, 874 (EIR inadequate when Lead Agency failed to identify relationship of project to relevant local plans). 91 Endangered Habitats League, Inc. v. County of Orange (2005) 131 Cal.App.4th 777, 783-4, 32 Cal.Rptr.3d 177; see also, County of El Dorado v. Dept. of Transp. (2005) 133 Cal.App.4th 1376. 298
January 17, 2023

6452-010j
(1) The proposed use is allowed within the applicable zoning district and complies with all other applicable provisions of the Zoning and Development Code, Municipal Code, general plan, any applicable specific plan or area plan, and City regulations/standards.
(2) The site is physically suited for the type, density, and intensity of the proposed use including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards.
(3) Granting the permit would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located.

Here, there is substantial evidence that the Project will conflict with finding number three. Specifically, the Project will result in significant air quality impacts during operations that would be detrimental to the health and safety of nearby residents. Additionally, the Project’s construction noise impacts on previously undisclosed nearby sensitive receptors will result in significant impacts precluding the Planning Commission from making the findings required under the Code.

Finally, the MND’s analysis of air quality ignores substantial evidence that the Census Tract 6071002301, which contains the Project site, is a designated disadvantaged community under Senate Bill 535.92
Census tract 6071002301is in the top 12th percentile of communities impacted by diesel particulate matter and the top 2nd percentile of communities impacted by ozone in the State of California.93 The City must reanalyze the air quality and health risk impacts of the Project and consider the public well-being of this already burdened community in an EIR. Given the Project’s location in a region with one of the nation’s worst records for air quality, in a disadvantaged community already overly burdened by exposure to harmful air contaminants, it is impossible to find that the Project is consistent with the findings required to approve the Project’s conditional use permits. The Project cannot be found to not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located. 92 California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, SB 535 Disadvantaged Communities (2022) available at https://oehha.ca.gov/calenviroscreen/sb535 93 Clark Comments, p. 6.
299
January 17, 2023

6452-010j
The City must prepare an EIR that includes a statement of overriding considerations to justify the use of the Project site.

XII. CONCLUSION
CEQA requires that an EIR be prepared if there is substantial evidence demonstrating that any aspect of a project, either individually or cumulatively, may cause a significant effect on the environment.94 As discussed herein, there is substantial evidence supporting a fair argument that the Project would result in significant adverse impacts that were not identified in the MND, and that are not adequately analyzed or mitigated. The MND also fails to contain the basic information and analysis required by CEQA, deficiencies which “cannot be dismissed as harmless or insignificant defects.”95 The City’s findings regarding Project impacts either do not comply with the law or are not supported by substantial evidence. Finally, the City cannot make the required findings to approve the entitlements sought by the Applicant.

The Planning Commission cannot approve the Project until it revises the Project’s land use analysis and prepares an EIR that resolves these issues and complies with CEQA’s requirements.

Sincerely,
Kevin Carmichael
KTC:ljl
94 Pub. Resources Code § 21151; 14 CCR §15063(b)(1).
95 Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. Bakersfield (2004) 124 Cal. App. 4th 1184, 1220. 300

ATTACHMENT A
301
1 | Page
January 12, 2022
Adams Broadwell Joseph & Cardozo
601 Gateway Boulevard, Suite 1000
South San Francisco, CA 94080
Attn: Mr. Kevin Carmichael
Subject: Comments On Initial Study/Mitigated Negative
Declaration (IS/MND) For Fontana Square Project,
16014 South Highland Avenue, Fontana, CA
Dear Mr. Carmichael:

At the request of Adams Broadwell Joseph & Cardozo (ABJC), Clark and Associates (Clark) has reviewed materials related to the December, 2022 City of Fontana’s (the City’s) IS/MND of the above referenced project.

Clark’s review of the materials in no way constitutes a validation of the conclusions or materials contained within the plan. If we do not comment on a specific item this does not constitute acceptance of the item.

Project Description:

According to the IS/MND1
the proposed Project is a commercial
development composed of a banquet hall (Development A), a Holiday Inn Express Hotel & Suite and a Staybridge Suites (Development B), a convenience (C-Store)/Restaurant (Development C), and an In-N-Out Burger (Development D). The Project will be built on a vacant rectangular-shaped site on 8.876 acres. The IS/MND states that the establishments would be generally located closer to the northern property 1 Kimley-Horn and Associates. 2022. City of Fontana, Fontana Square Project, Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration. December 2022. Pg 5
OFFICE
12405 Venice Blvd
Suite 331
Los Angeles, CA 90066
PHONE
310-907-6165
FAX
310-398-7626
EMAIL
[email protected]
Clark & Associates
Environmental Consulting, Inc.
302
2 | Page
boundary with most of the vehicle parking stalls along S. Highland Avenue, Citrus Avenue. Parking is also provided throughout the site and between the various establishments.

Figure 1: Site Location And Aerial Image of Project Site The proposed Project would consist of a number of buildings (A through D) with various heights.2 The tallest structure would be the 5-story hotel at 65 feet 7 inches (65’ 7”). • Development Area A would consist of a two-story (32’ tall) building designed to be a 38,907 square foot (SF) banquet hall. The banquet hall would have an 810-seat 2 Kimley-Horn and Associates. 2022. City of Fontana, Fontana Square Project, Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration. December 2022. Pgs 5-7.
303
3 | Page
capacity. Development A would be located on the northwest corner of the site on 1.65 acres.
• Development B would be a combined 121,094-SF, double branded 5-story hotel building. The proposed use would be generally located on the western half of the site on 2.28-acres of the overall Project site.
• Development C would be approximately 5,000-SF, one-story building, approximately 32’-10” in height, designated for a store or restaurant. Development C would be bordered by 12’X70’ loading area and a trash compartment to the north. • Development D would be a 3,885-SF, one-story building, approximately 23’-0” in height. Development D will be built as an In-N-Out Burger restaurant. In addition to the 3,885-square-feet ofseating area, Development D would be bordered by the drivethru and SR-210 to the north.

Figure 2: Proposed Project Site Plan
304
4 | Page
According to the IS/MND,3 the Project is anticipated to be developed in one phase. Upon Project approval, construction is anticipated to occur over a duration of approximately 18 months, beginning in the last quarter of 2022 and finishing in the first quarter of 2024. Construction activities would include the construction of a 6’-foot high concrete masonry units (CMU)/glass perimeter wall, fire access route, decorative paving, electrical vehicle charging stations.

Off-site improvements include perimeter curb and gutter along Citrus Avenue and S. Highland Avenue. Additionally, the Project would provide 57’-foot half right-of-way (ROW) on Citrus Avenue, would stripe a 200’-foot long southbound right-turn lane on Citrus Avenue, an 8’-foot storage lane.

The Project would provide a 104’-foot ROW near Driveway No. 2 and a 52’-foot half ROW near Driveway No. 1.

As part of the site’s grading activities, it is anticipated that the site would export 3,512.50 cubic yards (CY) of soil and import 5,490.50 CY of soil. Only one project feature and compliance measure for air quality has been outlined in the IS/MND. SC AQ-1 states that prior to the issuance of grading permits, the City Engineer shall confirm that the Grading Plan, Building Plans and Specifications require all construction contractors to comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District’s (SCAQMD’s) Rules 402 and 403 to minimize construction emissions of dust and particulates.

According to the City’s IS/MND of the Project, the potentially significant impacts identified in the IS/MND will be mitigated to less than significant levels. The conclusion from the City that the significant impacts can be mitigated is not supported by the facts of the Project. There are significant impacts that are not addressed in the City’s analysis that must be addressed in an environmental impact report (EIR).

Specific Comments:

1. The Project Site Is Located In An SB 535 Disadvantaged Community – The IS/MND Fails To Analyze How The Additional Emissions Will Impact The Community’s Health The City’s analysis of pollutants in this section of the response ignores substantial evidence 3 Kimley-Horn and Associates. 2022. City of Fontana, Fontana Square Project, Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration. December 2022. Pg 9.
305
5 | Page
from publicly available data demonstrating that the census tract in which the Project Site resides is in the top 25th percentile for pollution burden, pollution exposure, and DPM exposure in California.

Figure 3:CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Analysis Of Census Tract 6071002301

The designation for Census Tract 6071002301, which contains the Project Site, shows that the Census Tract is a designated disadvantaged community under SB 535. Adding an additional source of ozone precursors (unburned hydrocarbons from vehicle exhaust) and particulate matter will only increase the health burden in this community.
306
6 | Page
Figure 4: CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Pollution Burden Results For Project Site Location Census tract 6071002301 is in the top 12 percentile of communities impacted by particulate matter less than 2.5 microns (PM2.5) in the State of California. Important precursors for the formation of ozone are unburned hydrocarbons from vehicles and NOx both of which are directly associated with the Project site. Increasing the number of sources of unburned hydrocarbons, NOx, and particulate exhaust in an area already severely impacted will exacerbate the existing adverse health conditions 307
7 | Page
impacting people in the Fontana census tract and increase pollution in the Southern California Air Basin (SCAB). The City must address these substantial impacts on the surrounding community and SCAB in an EIR.

2. The City’s Air Quality Analysis Fails To Include A Quantitative Health Risk Analysis Of The Impacts Of Toxic Air Contaminants From The Construction Phase And Operational Phase Of The Project For The Nearest Sensitive Receptor(s) City has failed to conduct a numerical health risk analysis (HRA) for emissions of toxic air contaminants (TACs) related to the construction phase and operational phase of the Project. The IS/MND states that, for the purposes of assessing pollution concentrations upon sensitive receptors, the SCAQMD has developed localized significance thresholds (LSTs) that are based on the number of pounds of emissions per day that can be generated by a project that would cause or contribute to adverse localized air quality impacts. For the Criteria Pollutants assessed under CEQA, this is correct.

For TACs, there are no LSTs, nor levels of significance based on the pounds per day. Instead, the determination of a significance threshold is based on a quantitatiave risk analysis that requires the City to perform a multistep, quantitative health risk analysis.

TACs, including diesel particulate matter (DPM)4
, contribute to a host of respiratory impacts
and may lead to the development of various cancers. Failing to quantify those impacts places the community at risk for unwanted adverse health impacts. Even brief exposures to the TACs could lead to the development of adverse health impacts over the life of an individual.

Diesel exhaust contains nearly 40 toxic substances, including TACs and may pose a serious public health risk for residents in the vicinity of the facility. TACs are airborne substances that are capable of causing short-term (acute) and/or long-term (chronic or carcinogenic, i.e., cancer causing) adverse human health effects (i.e., injury or illness). TACs include both organic and inorganic chemical substances. The current California list of TACs includes approximately 200 compounds, including particulate emissions from diesel-fueled engines. 4 Because DPM is a TAC, it is a different air pollutant than criteria particulate matter (PM) emissions such as PM10, PM2.5, and fugitive dust. DPM exposure causes acute health effects that are different from the effects of exposure to PM alone.
308
8 | Page
Diesel exhaust has been linked to a range of serious health problems including an increase in respiratory disease, lung damage, cancer, and premature death. 5,6,7 Fine DPM is deposited deep in the
lungs in the smallest airways and can result in increased respiratory symptoms and disease; decreased lung function, particularly in children and individuals with asthma; alterations in lung tissue and respiratory tract defense mechanisms; and premature death.8 Exposure to DPM increases the risk of
lung cancer. It also causes non-cancer effects including chronic bronchitis, inflammation of lung tissue, thickening of the alveolar walls, immunological allergic reactions, and airway constriction.9 DPM is a TAC that is recognized by state and federal agencies as causing severe health risk because it contains toxic materials, unlike PM2.5 and PM10.
10 The inherent toxicity of the TACs requires the City to first quantify the concentration released into the environment at each of the sensitive receptor locations through air dispersion modeling, calculate the dose of each TAC at that location, and quantify the cancer risk and hazard index for each of the chemicals of concern. Following that analysis, then the City can make a determination of the relative significance of the emissions.

No effort is made in the IS/MND to quantify the potential health impacts from DPM generated by construction activities or operational activities from the Project on these sensitive receptors. The City’s failure to perform such an analysis is clearly a major flaw in the IS/MND and may be placing the residents of the adjacent structures at risk from the construction and operational phases of the Project.
5 California Air Resources Board, Initial Statement of Reasons for Rulemaking, Proposed Identification of Diesel Exhaust as a Toxic Air Contaminant, Staff Report, June 1998; see also California Air Resources Board, Overview:

Diesel Exhaust & Health, https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/resources/overview-diesel-exhaust-andhealth#:~:text=Diesel%20Particulate%20Matter%20and%20Health&text=In%201998%2C%20CARB%20identified%2 0DPM,and%20other%20adverse%20health%20effects.
6 U.S. EPA, Health Assessment Document for Diesel Engine Exhaust, Report EPA/600/8-90/057F, May 2002. 7 Environmental Defense Fund, Cleaner Diesel Handbook, Bring Cleaner Fuel and Diesel Retrofits into Your Neighborhood, April 2005; http://www.edf.org/documents/4941_cleanerdieselhandbook.pdf, accessed July 5, 2020. 8 California Air Resources Board, Initial Statement of Reasons for Rulemaking, Proposed Identification of Diesel Exhaust as a Toxic Air Contaminant, Staff Report, June 1998. 9 Findings of the Scientific Review Panel on The Report on Diesel Exhaust as adopted at the Panel’s April 22, 1998 Meeting.
10 Health & Safety Code § 39655(a) (defining “toxic air contaminant” as air pollutants “which may cause or contribute to an increase in mortality or in serious illness, or which may pose a present or potential hazard to human health. A substance that is listed as a hazardous air pollutant pursuant to subsection (b) of Section 112 of the federal act (42 U.S.C.

Sec. 7412 (b)) is a toxic air contaminant.”)
309
9 | Page

3. A Screening Level HRA Of The Operational Emissions From The Project Show An Excess Risk To Residents Near The Project Site.

The Air Quality Analysis provided in Appendix A to the IS/MND, shows that the operational emissions for the project will emit 0.5520 pounds per day of PM2.5 exhaust. The majority of the exhaust will be generated driving to and from the site, based on the CALEEMOD analysis. Transiting the Project Site via the parking lots would take approximately 0.5 miles. Assuming the 4,924 vehicle trips per day transit the site, this equates to 2,462 miles worth of traffic per day or 898,630 miles per year. This equates to 16% (898,630 VMT onsite/5,469,612 mitigated VMT) of the exhaust calculated in the CALEEMOD analysis being generated onsite or 0.08832 pounds of exhaust will be emitted every day.
310
10 | Page
Assuming that emissions will be limited to a 16-hour period during weekdays and weekends, it is possible to calculate an averaged emissions over the Project site. Using AERMOD, the US EPA’s preferred air dispersion model, it is possible to calculate the concentrations of exhaust as PM2.5 (usually assumed to be diesel particulate matter – DPM) from the operational area of the Project on the closest receptors located across Highland Avenue. AERMOD is an acronym for the American Meteorological Society/Environmental Protection Agency Regulatory Model Improvement Committee’s Dispersion Model. AERMOD contains the necessary algorithms to model air concentrations from a wide range of emission source types, including stack-based point sources, fugitive area sources, and volume sources. The modeling domain for the area including the Project Site is indicated in the figure below. 311
11 | Page
Figure 5: AERMOD Model Domain
Using the meteorological data from SCAQMD for the Fontana monitoring station (closest met station to the Project site), the concentrations at the homes south of the Project Site were calculated and are summarized below.
312
12 | Page
Figure 6: Annual Exhaust Concentration In Community
The maximum concentration in the homes immediately south of the Project site calculated in the AERMOD model is 0.154 ug/m3. The averaged concentration for the area modeled was 0.039 ug/m3
.

Using the OEHHA’s HARP 2 Standalone Risk software, the cancer risk to the community was calculated. The cumulative risk for exposure of residents during the 30 years of operation assuming the averaged DPM concentration of 0.039 ug/m3 is 33.8 in 1,000,000, much greater than the 10 in 1,000,000 threshold outlined by SCAQMD, resulting in a significant impact. The results of the air model and the health risk analysis are attached as an appendix to this letter. 313
13 | Page

4. The IS/MND Does Not Consider The Impact From Historic Emissions Associated With The Kaiser Steel Mill On The Soils At The Project Site.

The Project site is within the fall-out zone for the former Kaiser Steel Mill site because the Project site resides less than 3.4 miles from the edge of the former Kaiser Steel Mill site.

Figure 7: Location of Project Site In Relation To Former Kaiser Steel Mill The original Kaiser Steel Mill, located on approximately 1,200 acres in Fontana is located approximately 3.4 miles to the southwest of the Project site. The Kaiser Steel Mill facility was an integrated steel production plant that the Kaiser Steel Corporation owned and operated from approximately 1942 to 1983. Studies of the steel mill found that it emitted large quantities of carcinogenic compounds that persist in the environment11 and that the emission controls on the plant 11 KVB. 1970. An Inventory Of Carcinogenic Substances Released Into The Ambient Air Of California. Final Report – Task II & IV. Prepared for Science Applications, Inc by R.M. Roberts, KVB, Inc. Energy and Environmental Systems.

March, 1980.

Fontana Square
Project Site
Kaiser Steel Mill
314
14 | Page
were deficient. 12 In 1970, a report by KVB13 sought to identity areas where the highest concentrations of emissions might be expected to occur resulting from the Mill’s use or manufacture of 11 listed carcinogenic substances. The report focused on recognized “hot spots” in which carcinogenic compounds were released and had the potential for dispersion after release. At the time of the initial evaluation of the plant in 1980, there was a concern about the emissions from the Kaiser Steel Mill being one of the largest sources of polycyclic organic matter (POMs are also known as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons), arsenic, cadmium, and benzene in California.14 Arsenic, cadmium, and POMs are not subject to degradation in the environment and will represent a COPC for the area.

According to the U.S. EPA’s 1976 assessment of visible emissions from the Steel Mill,15 the basic coke, iron and steel processes result in the emission to the atmosphere of excessive levels of particulate air pollutants, despite the installation of various air pollution control devices. The aerial extent of the contamination was not defined in the study. A review of aerial photographs from the 1950s shows clear evidence that emissions from the Kaiser Steel Mill extend well beyond the boundaries of the facility and would have reached the Project Site.
12 U.S. EPA. 1976. Visible Emission Observation, Kaiser Steel Corporation, Fontana, California, September, 1975.

EPA-330/2-76-028.
13 KVB. 1970. An Inventory Of Carcinogenic Substances Released Into The Ambient Air Of California. Final Report – Task II & IV. Prepared for Science Applications, Inc by R.M. Roberts, KVB, Inc. Energy and Environmental Systems.

March, 1980.
14 KVB. 1970. An Inventory Of Carcinogenic Substances Released Into The Ambient Air Of California. Final Report – Task II & IV. Prepared for Science Applications, Inc by R.M. Roberts, KVB, Inc. Energy and Environmental Systems.

March, 1980.
15 U.S. EPA. 1976. Visible Emission Observation, Kaiser Steel Corporation, Fontana, California, September, 1975.

EPA-330/2-76-028.
315
15 | Page
Figure 8: Kaiser Steel Mill Emissions Circa 1951
Emissions from the plant would have covered the area of the Project Site for many decades and present a recognized environmental concern (REC) for the site which was not identified previously in the IS/MND.

The Project’s construction phase will disturb large quantities of soils in areas that could have been impacted by the steel mills emissions. Mechanically disturbing the soils will release impacted soils that will migrate offsite to the residences nearby. The City must assess the concentrations of contaminants (primarily polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and metals) that may be present in the soils of the Project site and calculate their associated health risks. The City must correct this error in the hazardous materials section of the IS/MND by preparing a Phase II subsurface investigation and present the results in an EIR.

Fontana Square
Project Site
Kaiser Steel Mill
316
16 | Page
Conclusion
The facts identified and referenced in this comment letter lead me to reasonably conclude that the Project could result in significant unmitigated impacts if the IS/MND is approved. The City must re-evaluate the significant impacts identified in this letter by requiring the preparation of an environmental impact report.

Sincerely,
.
317
James J. J. Clark, Ph.D.

Principal Toxicologist
Toxicology/Exposure Assessment Modeling
Risk Assessment/Analysis/Dispersion Modeling
Education:

Ph.D., Environmental Health Science, University of California, 1995 M.S., Environmental Health Science, University of California, 1993 B.S., Biophysical and Biochemical Sciences, University of Houston, 1987 Professional Experience:

Dr. Clark is a well-recognized toxicologist, air modeler, and health scientist. He has 30 years of experience in researching the effects of environmental contaminants on human health including environmental fate and transport modeling (SCREEN3, AEROMOD, ISCST3, Johnson-Ettinger Vapor Intrusion Modeling, RESRAD, GENII); exposure assessment modeling (partitioning of contaminants in the environment as well as PBPK modeling); conducting and managing human health risk assessments for regulatory compliance and risk-based clean-up levels; and toxicological and medical literature research.

Significant projects performed by Dr. Clark include the following:

LITIGATION SUPPORT
Case: Pamela Butler Vs. Mallinckrodt, Inc. & Cotter Corporation. Case No.:
4:2018cv01701 United States District Court Eastern District of Missouri Eastern Division
Case: Kenneth Edward Koterba Vs. Mallinckrodt, Inc. & Cotter Corporation.

Case No.: 4:2018cv01702 United States District Court Eastern District of Missouri Eastern Division
Case: Anthony Hines Vs. Mallinckrodt, Inc. & Cotter Corporation. Case No.:
4:2018cv01703 United States District Court Eastern District of Missouri Eastern Division
Clark & Associates
Environmental Consulting, Inc
Office
12405 Venice Blvd.

Suite 331
Los Angeles, CA 90066
Phone
310-907-6165
Fax
310-398-7626
Email
[email protected]
318
Case: Emery David Walick, III Vs. Mallinckrodt, Inc. & Cotter Corporation. Case No.: 4:2018cv01704 United States District Court Eastern District of Missouri Eastern Division
Client: Humphrey, Farrington & McClain, P.C., Independence, Missouri Dr. Clark performed a historical dose reconstruction for community members exposed to radioactive waste released into the environment from the St. Louis Air Port Site (SLAPS) and the Hazelwood Interim Storage Site (HISS). The releases resulted in impacts to soils, sediments, surface waters, and groundwater in the vicinity of the SLAPS and HISS sites.

The analysis was performed in general accordance with the methods outlined by the Agency for Toxic Substances Control (ATSDR) for assessing radiation doses from historical source areas in North St. Louis County, Missouri.

Case Result: Trial Pending
Case: Don Strong, et al. vs. Republic Services, Inc., Bridgeton Landfill, LLC, vs.

Cotter Corporation, N.S.L., Case No.: 17SL-CC01632-01 Circuit Court of St. Louis County, State of Missouri, Division 17
Client: Humphrey, Farrington & McClain, P.C., Independence, Missouri Dr. Clark performed a historical dose reconstruction for community members from radiologically impacted material (RIM) releases from the adjacent West Lake Landfill.

The analysis was performed in general accordance with the methods outlined by the Agency for Toxic Substances Control (ATSDR) for assessing radiation doses from historical source areas in North St. Louis County, Missouri.

Case Result: Settlement in favor of plaintiff.

Case: Arnold Goldstein, Hohn Covas, Gisela Janette La Bella, et al.. vs. Exxon Mobil Corporation, PBF Energy Inc., Torrance Refining Company LLC, et al., Case No.: 2:17-cv-02477DSF United States District Court for the Central District of California
Client: Sher Edlging, LLP, San Francisco, California and Matern Law Group , PC., El Segundo, California
319
Dr. Clark performed a historical dose reconstruction for community members from an active 700 acre petroleum refinery in Los Angeles. The analysis included a multi-year dispersion model was performed in general accordance with the methods outlined by the U.S. EPA and the SCAQMD for assessing the health impacts in Torrance, California. The results of the analysis are being used as the basis for injunctive relief for the communities surrounding the refinery.

Case Result: Trial Pending
Case: Scott D. McClurg, et al. v. Mallinckrodt Inc. and Cotter Corporation.

Lead Case No.: 4:12CV00361 AGF United States District Court Eastern District of Missouri Eastern Division
Client: Environmental Law Group, Birmingham, AL.

Dr. Clark performed a historical dose reconstruction for community members and workers exposed to radioactive waste released into the environment from the St. Louis Air Port Site (SLAPS) and the Hazelwood Interim Storage Site (HISS). The releases resulted in impacts to soils, sediments, surface waters, and groundwater in the vicinity of the SLAPS and HISS sites. The analysis included the incorporation of air dispersion modeling across the community to determine ground-level air concentrations and deposition of thorium and uranium isotopes and their respective daughter products. The dose reconstruction considered all relevant pathways to determine total doses of radiation received across the community from 1946 through 2017.

Case Result: Settlement in favor of plaintiff.

Case: Mary Ann Piccolo V. Headwaters Incorporated, et al. Seventh Judicial Court In and For Carbon County, State of Utah. Case No. 130700053 Client: Law Offices of Roy L. Mason. Annapolis, MD
Dr. Clark performed a dose assessment of an individual occupationally exposed to metals and silica from fly ash who later developed cancer. A review of the individual’s medical and occupational history was performed to prepare opinions regarding his exposure and later development of cancer.
320
Case Result: Settlement in favor of plaintiff.

Case: Tracey Coleman V. Headwaters Incorporated, et al. Seventh Judicial Court In and For Carbon County, State of Utah. Case No. 140902847 Client: Law Offices of Roy L. Mason. Annapolis, MD
Dr. Clark performed a dose assessment of an individual occupationally exposed to metals and silica from fly ash who later developed cancer. A review of the individual’s medical and occupational history was performed to prepare opinions regarding his exposure and later development of cancer.

Case Result: Settlement in favor of plaintiff.

Case: David Dominguez and Amanda Dominguez V. Cytec Industries, Inc et al.

Superior Court of the State Of California for the County Of Los Angeles – Central Civil West. Civil Action. BC533123
Client: Rose, Klein, Marias, LLP, Long Beach, California Dr. Clark performed a toxicological assessment of an individual occupationally exposed to hexavalent chromium who later developed cancer. A review of the individual’s medical and occupational history was performed to prepare opinions regarding her exposure and later development of cancer.

Case Result: Settlement in favor of plaintiff.

SELECTED AIR MODELING RESEARCH/PROJECTS
Client(s) – Multiple
Indoor Air Evaluations, California: Performed multiple indoor air screening evaluations and risk characterizations consistent with California Environmental Protection Agency’s (Cal/EPA) Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) methodologies. Characterizations included the use of DTSC’s modified Johnson & Ettinger Model and USEPA models, as well as the attenuation factor model currently advocated by Cal/EPA’s Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment (OEHHA).
321
Client – Confidential
Dr. Clark performed a comprehensive evaluation of criteria pollutants, air toxins, and particulate matter emissions from a carbon black production facility to determine the impacts on the surrounding communities. The results of the dispersion model were used to estimate acute and chronic exposure concentrations to multiple contaminants and were be incorporated into a comprehensive risk evaluation.

Client – Confidential
Dr. Clark performed a comprehensive evaluation of air toxins and particulate matter emissions from a railroad tie manufacturing facility to determine the impacts on the surrounding communities. The results of the dispersion model have been used to estimate acute and chronic exposure concentrations to multiple contaminants and have been incorporated into a comprehensive risk evaluation.

EMERGING/PERSISTENT CONTAMINANT RESEARCH/PROJECTS
Client: City of Santa Clarita, Santa Clarita, California Dr. Clark managed the oversight of the characterization, remediation and development activities of a former 1,000 acre munitions manufacturing facility for the City of Santa Clarita. The site is impacted with a number of contaminants including perchlorate, unexploded ordinance, and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). The site is currently under a number of regulatory consent orders, including an Immanent and Substantial Endangerment Order. Dr. Clark assisted the impacted municipality with the development of remediation strategies, interaction with the responsible parties and stakeholders, as well as interfacing with the regulatory agency responsible for oversight of the site cleanup.

Client – Confidential, Los Angeles, California
Dr. Clark is performing a comprehensive review of the potential for pharmaceuticals and their by-products to impact groundwater and surface water supplies. This evaluation will include a review if available data on the history of pharmaceutical production in the United States; the chemical characteristics of various pharmaceuticals; environmental fate and transport; uptake by xenobiotics; the potential effects of pharmaceuticals on water treatment systems; and the potential threat to public health. The results of the evaluation may be used as a briefing tool for non-public health professionals. 322

PUBLIC HEALTH/TOXICOLOGY
Client: Brayton Purcell, Novato, California
Dr. Clark performed a toxicological assessment of residents exposed to methyl-tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) from leaking underground storage tanks (LUSTs) adjacent to the subject property. The symptomology of residents and guests of the subject property were evaluated against the known outcomes in published literature to exposure to MTBE. The study found that residents had been exposed to MTBE in their drinking water; that concentrations of MTBE detected at the site were above regulatory guidelines; and, that the symptoms and outcomes expressed by residents and guests were consistent with symptoms and outcomes documented in published literature.

Client: Covanta Energy, Westwood, California
Evaluated health risk from metals in biosolids applied as soil amendment on agricultural lands. The biosolids were created at a forest waste cogeneration facility using 96% whole tree wood chips and 4 percent green waste. Mass loading calculations were used to estimate Cr(VI) concentrations in agricultural soils based on a maximum loading rate of 40 tons of biomass per acre of agricultural soil. The results of the study were used by the Regulatory agency to determine that the application of biosolids did not constitute a health risk to workers applying the biosolids or to residences near the agricultural lands.

Client: Kaiser Venture Incorporated, Fontana, California Prepared PBPK assessment of lead risk of receptors at a 1,100-acre former steel mill. This evaluation was used as the basis for granting closure of the site by lead regulatory agency.

RISK ASSESSMENTS/REMEDIAL INVESTIGATIONS
Kaiser Ventures Incorporated, Fontana, California
Prepared health risk assessment of semi-volatile organic chemicals and metals for a fiftyyear old wastewater treatment facility used at a 1,100-acre former steel mill. This evaluation was used as the basis for granting closure of the site by lead regulatory agency. 323
ANR Freight - Los Angeles, California
Prepared a comprehensive Preliminary Endangerment Assessment (PEA) of petroleum hydrocarbon and metal contamination of a former freight depot. This evaluation was as the basis for reaching closure of the site with lead regulatory agency.

Kaiser Ventures Incorporated, Fontana, California
Prepared comprehensive health risk assessment of semi-volatile organic chemicals and metals for 23-acre parcel of a 1,100-acre former steel mill. The health risk assessment was used to determine clean up goals and as the basis for granting closure of the site by lead regulatory agency. Air dispersion modeling using ISCST3 was performed to determine downwind exposure point concentrations at sensitive receptors within a 1 kilometer radius of the site. The results of the health risk assessment were presented at a public meeting sponsored by the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) in the community potentially affected by the site.

Unocal Corporation - Los Angeles, California
Prepared comprehensive assessment of petroleum hydrocarbons and metals for a former petroleum service station located next to sensitive population center (elementary school).

The assessment used a probabilistic approach to estimate risks to the community and was used as the basis for granting closure of the site by lead regulatory agency.

Client: Confidential, Los Angeles, California
Managed oversight of remedial investigation most contaminated heavy metal site in California. Lead concentrations in soil excess of 68,000,000 parts per billion (ppb) have been measured at the site. This State Superfund Site was a former hard chrome plating operation that operated for approximately 40-years.

Client: Confidential, San Francisco, California
Coordinator of regional monitoring program to determine background concentrations of metals in air. Acted as liaison with SCAQMD and CARB to perform co-location sampling and comparison of accepted regulatory method with ASTM methodology. 324
Client: Confidential, San Francisco, California
Analyzed historical air monitoring data for South Coast Air Basin in Southern California and potential health risks related to ambient concentrations of carcinogenic metals and volatile organic compounds. Identified and reviewed the available literature and calculated risks from toxins in South Coast Air Basin.

IT Corporation, North Carolina
Prepared comprehensive evaluation of potential exposure of workers to air-borne VOCs at hazardous waste storage facility under SUPERFUND cleanup decree. Assessment used in developing health based clean-up levels.

Professional Associations
American Public Health Association (APHA)
Association for Environmental Health and Sciences (AEHS) American Chemical Society (ACS)
International Society of Environmental Forensics (ISEF) Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) Publications and Presentations:

Books and Book Chapters
Sullivan, P., J.J. J. Clark, F.J. Agardy, and P.E. Rosenfeld. (2007). Synthetic Toxins In The Food, Water and Air of American Cities. Elsevier, Inc. Burlington, MA.

Sullivan, P. and J.J. J. Clark. 2006. Choosing Safer Foods, A Guide To Minimizing Synthetic Chemicals In Your Diet. Elsevier, Inc. Burlington, MA.

Sullivan, P., Agardy, F.J., and J.J.J. Clark. 2005. The Environmental Science of Drinking Water. Elsevier, Inc. Burlington, MA.

Sullivan, P.J., Agardy, F.J., Clark, J.J.J. 2002. America’s Threatened Drinking Water:

Hazards and Solutions. Trafford Publishing, Victoria B.C.

Clark, J.J.J. 2001. “TBA: Chemical Properties, Production & Use, Fate and Transport, Toxicology, Detection in Groundwater, and Regulatory Standards” in Oxygenates in the Environment. Art Diaz, Ed.. Oxford University Press: New York.

Clark, J.J.J. 2000. “Toxicology of Perchlorate” in Perchlorate in the Environment.

Edward Urbansky, Ed. Kluwer/Plenum: New York.

Clark, J.J.J. 1995. Probabilistic Forecasting of Volatile Organic Compound Concentrations At The Soil Surface From Contaminated Groundwater. UMI. 325
Baker, J.; Clark, J.J.J.; Stanford, J.T. 1994. Ex Situ Remediation of Diesel Contaminated Railroad Sand by Soil Washing. Principles and Practices for Diesel Contaminated Soils, Volume III. P.T. Kostecki, E.J. Calabrese, and C.P.L. Barkan, eds. Amherst Scientific Publishers, Amherst, MA. pp 89-96.

Journal and Proceeding Articles
Tam L. K.., Wu C. D., Clark J. J. and Rosenfeld, P.E. (2008) A Statistical Analysis Of Attic Dust And Blood Lipid Concentrations Of Tetrachloro-p-Dibenzodioxin (TCDD) Toxicity Equialency Quotients (TEQ) In Two Populations Near Wood Treatment Facilities. Organohalogen Compounds, Volume 70 (2008) page 002254.

Tam L. K.., Wu C. D., Clark J. J. and Rosenfeld, P.E. (2008) Methods For Collect Samples For Assessing Dioxins And Other Environmental Contaminants In Attic Dust: A Review. Organohalogen Compounds, Volume 70 (2008) page 000527 Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (2007). “Attic Dust And Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility.” Environmental Research. 105:194-199.

Rosenfeld, P.E., Clark, J. J., Hensley, A.R., and Suffet, I.H. 2007. “The Use Of An Odor Wheel Classification For The Evaluation of Human Health Risk Criteria For Compost Facilities” Water Science & Technology. 55(5): 345-357.

Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. 2006. “Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility.” The 26th International Symposium on Halogenated Persistent Organic Pollutants – DIOXIN2006, August 21 – 25, 2006. Radisson SAS Scandinavia Hotel in Oslo Norway.

Rosenfeld, P.E., Clark, J. J. and Suffet, I.H. 2005. “The Value Of An Odor Quality Classification Scheme For Compost Facility Evaluations” The U.S. Composting Council’s 13th Annual Conference January 23 - 26, 2005, Crowne Plaza Riverwalk, San Antonio, TX.

Rosenfeld, P.E., Clark, J. J. and Suffet, I.H. 2004. “The Value Of An Odor Quality Classification Scheme For Urban Odor” WEFTEC 2004. 77th Annual Technical Exhibition & Conference October 2 - 6, 2004, Ernest N. Morial Convention Center, New Orleans, Louisiana.

Clark, J.J.J. 2003. “Manufacturing, Use, Regulation, and Occurrence of a Known Endocrine Disrupting Chemical (EDC), 2,4-Dichlorophnoxyacetic Acid (2,4-D) in California Drinking Water Supplies.” National Groundwater Association Southwest Focus Conference: Water Supply and Emerging Contaminants. Minneapolis, MN.

March 20, 2003.
326
Rosenfeld, P. and J.J.J. Clark. 2003. “Understanding Historical Use, Chemical Properties, Toxicity, and Regulatory Guidance” National Groundwater Association Southwest Focus Conference: Water Supply and Emerging Contaminants. Phoenix, AZ. February 21, 2003.

Clark, J.J.J., Brown A. 1999. Perchlorate Contamination: Fate in the Environment and Treatment Options. In Situ and On-Site Bioremediation, Fifth International Symposium. San Diego, CA, April, 1999.

Clark, J.J.J. 1998. Health Effects of Perchlorate and the New Reference Dose (RfD).

Proceedings From the Groundwater Resource Association Seventh Annual Meeting, Walnut Creek, CA, October 23, 1998.

Browne, T., Clark, J.J.J. 1998. Treatment Options For Perchlorate In Drinking Water.

Proceedings From the Groundwater Resource Association Seventh Annual Meeting, Walnut Creek, CA, October 23, 1998.

Clark, J.J.J., Brown, A., Rodriguez, R. 1998. The Public Health Implications of MtBE and Perchlorate in Water: Risk Management Decisions for Water Purveyors.

Proceedings of the National Ground Water Association, Anaheim, CA, June 3-4, 1998.

Clark J.J.J., Brown, A., Ulrey, A. 1997. Impacts of Perchlorate On Drinking Water In The Western United States. U.S. EPA Symposium on Biological and Chemical Reduction of Chlorate and Perchlorate, Cincinnati, OH, December 5, 1997.

Clark, J.J.J.; Corbett, G.E.; Kerger, B.D.; Finley, B.L.; Paustenbach, D.J. 1996. Dermal Uptake of Hexavalent Chromium In Human Volunteers: Measures of Systemic Uptake From Immersion in Water At 22 PPM. Toxicologist. 30(1):14.

Dodge, D.G.; Clark, J.J.J.; Kerger, B.D.; Richter, R.O.; Finley, B.L.; Paustenbach, D.J. 1996. Assessment of Airborne Hexavalent Chromium In The Home Following Use of Contaminated Tapwater. Toxicologist. 30(1):117-118.

Paulo, M.T.; Gong, H., Jr.; Clark, J.J.J. (1992). Effects of Pretreatment with Ipratroprium Bromide in COPD Patients Exposed to Ozone. American Review of Respiratory Disease. 145(4):A96.

Harber, P.H.; Gong, H., Jr.; Lachenbruch, A.; Clark, J.; Hsu, P. (1992). Respiratory Pattern Effect of Acute Sulfur Dioxide Exposure in Asthmatics. American Review of Respiratory Disease. 145(4):A88.

McManus, M.S.; Gong, H., Jr.; Clements, P.; Clark, J.J.J. (1991). Respiratory Response of Patients With Interstitial Lung Disease To Inhaled Ozone. American Review of Respiratory Disease. 143(4):A91.

Gong, H., Jr.; Simmons, M.S.; McManus, M.S.; Tashkin, D.P.; Clark, V.A.; Detels, R.; Clark, J.J. (1990). Relationship Between Responses to Chronic Oxidant and Acute 327
Ozone Exposures in Residents of Los Angeles County. American Review of Respiratory Disease. 141(4):A70.

Tierney, D.F. and J.J.J. Clark. (1990). Lung Polyamine Content Can Be Increased By Spermidine Infusions Into Hyperoxic Rats. American Review of Respiratory Disease. 139(4):A41.
328

EXHIBIT B

AERMOD ANALYSIS AND HRA
329
1 ** BREEZE AERMOD
2 ** Trinity Consultants
3 ** VERSION 11.0
4 5 CO STARTING
6 CO TITLEONE Fontana Square Emisions
7 CO MODELOPT DFAULT CONC NODRYDPLT NOWETDPLT
8 CO RUNORNOT RUN
9 CO AVERTIME PERIOD
10 CO POLLUTID Exhaust
11 CO FINISHED
12 13 SO STARTING
14 SO ELEVUNIT METERS
15 SO LOCATION E5FG71XG AREAPOLY 457814.9 3777234.1 456.47 16 SO LOCATION E5FG71XH AREAPOLY 458037.5 3777233.5 457.96 17 SO SRCPARAM E5FG71XG 5.39175E-08 4 5 1.86
18 SO SRCPARAM E5FG71XH 8.37969E-08 4 7 1.86
19 SO AREAVERT E5FG71XG 457814.9 3777234.1 457814.9 3777217.4 457985.1 3777218 457984.5 3777234.1
20 SO AREAVERT E5FG71XG 457814.9 3777234.1
21 SO AREAVERT E5FG71XH 458037.5 3777233.5 458038.1 3777217.4 458161.3 3777208.5 458157.1 3777282.9
22 SO AREAVERT E5FG71XH 458126.8 3777291.8 458066.7 3777292.4 458037.5 3777233.5 23 SO SRCGROUP ALL
24 SO FINISHED
25 26 RE STARTING
27 RE ELEVUNIT METERS
28 RE DISCCART 457753.8 3776998.9 450.81 1732.5
29 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
30 RE DISCCART 457763.8 3776998.9 450.95 1732.5
31 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
32 RE DISCCART 457773.8 3776998.9 451.05 1732.5
33 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
34 RE DISCCART 457783.8 3776998.9 451.05 1732.5
35 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
36 RE DISCCART 457793.8 3776998.9 451.08 1732.5
37 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
38 RE DISCCART 457803.8 3776998.9 451.17 1732.5
39 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
40 RE DISCCART 457813.8 3776998.9 451.24 1732.5
41 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
42 RE DISCCART 457823.8 3776998.9 451.31 1732.5
43 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
44 RE DISCCART 457833.8 3776998.9 451.37 1732.5
45 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
46 RE DISCCART 457843.8 3776998.9 451.45 1732.5
47 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
48 RE DISCCART 457853.8 3776998.9 451.55 1732.5
49 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
50 RE DISCCART 457863.8 3776998.9 451.55 1732.5
51 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
52 RE DISCCART 457873.8 3776998.9 451.55 1732.5
53 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
54 RE DISCCART 457883.8 3776998.9 451.55 1732.5
55 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
56 RE DISCCART 457893.8 3776998.9 451.58 1732.5
57 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
58 RE DISCCART 457903.8 3776998.9 451.62 1732.5
59 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
60 RE DISCCART 457913.8 3776998.9 451.62 1732.5
61 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
62 RE DISCCART 457923.8 3776998.9 451.62 1732.5
63 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
64 RE DISCCART 457933.8 3776998.9 451.63 1732.5 330
65 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
66 RE DISCCART 457943.8 3776998.9 451.65 1732.5
67 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
68 RE DISCCART 457953.8 3776998.9 451.68 1732.5
69 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
70 RE DISCCART 457963.8 3776998.9 451.72 1732.5
71 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
72 RE DISCCART 457973.8 3776998.9 451.74 1732.5
73 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
74 RE DISCCART 457983.8 3776998.9 451.77 1732.5
75 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
76 RE DISCCART 457993.8 3776998.9 451.77 1732.5
77 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
78 RE DISCCART 458003.8 3776998.9 451.77 1732.5
79 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
80 RE DISCCART 458013.8 3776998.9 451.78 1732.5
81 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
82 RE DISCCART 458023.8 3776998.9 451.83 1732.5
83 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
84 RE DISCCART 458033.8 3776998.9 451.88 1732.5
85 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
86 RE DISCCART 458043.8 3776998.9 451.96 1732.5
87 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
88 RE DISCCART 458053.8 3776998.9 452.05 1732.5
89 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
90 RE DISCCART 458063.8 3776998.9 452.08 1732.5
91 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
92 RE DISCCART 458073.8 3776998.9 452.13 1732.5
93 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
94 RE DISCCART 458083.8 3776998.9 452.2 1732.5
95 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
96 RE DISCCART 458093.8 3776998.9 452.28 1732.5
97 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
98 RE DISCCART 458103.8 3776998.9 452.33 1732.5
99 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
100 RE DISCCART 458113.8 3776998.9 452.45 1732.5
101 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
102 RE DISCCART 458123.8 3776998.9 452.58 1732.5
103 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
104 RE DISCCART 458133.8 3776998.9 452.63 1732.5
105 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
106 RE DISCCART 458143.8 3776998.9 452.7 1732.5
107 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
108 RE DISCCART 458153.8 3776998.9 452.77 1732.5
109 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
110 RE DISCCART 458163.8 3776998.9 452.81 1732.5
111 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
112 RE DISCCART 457753.8 3777008.9 451.08 1732.5
113 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
114 RE DISCCART 457763.8 3777008.9 451.17 1732.5
115 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
116 RE DISCCART 457773.8 3777008.9 451.22 1732.5
117 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
118 RE DISCCART 457783.8 3777008.9 451.24 1732.5
119 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
120 RE DISCCART 457793.8 3777008.9 451.27 1732.5
121 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
122 RE DISCCART 457803.8 3777008.9 451.31 1732.5
123 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
124 RE DISCCART 457813.8 3777008.9 451.45 1732.5
125 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
126 RE DISCCART 457823.8 3777008.9 451.58 1732.5
127 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
128 RE DISCCART 457833.8 3777008.9 451.62 1732.5
129 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
130 RE DISCCART 457843.8 3777008.9 451.67 1732.5 331
131 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
132 RE DISCCART 457853.8 3777008.9 451.72 1732.5
133 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
134 RE DISCCART 457863.8 3777008.9 451.74 1732.5
135 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
136 RE DISCCART 457873.8 3777008.9 451.77 1732.5
137 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
138 RE DISCCART 457883.8 3777008.9 451.77 1732.5
139 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
140 RE DISCCART 457893.8 3777008.9 451.77 1732.5
141 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
142 RE DISCCART 457903.8 3777008.9 451.78 1732.5
143 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
144 RE DISCCART 457913.8 3777008.9 451.79 1732.5
145 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
146 RE DISCCART 457923.8 3777008.9 451.79 1732.5
147 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
148 RE DISCCART 457933.8 3777008.9 451.83 1732.5
149 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
150 RE DISCCART 457943.8 3777008.9 451.87 1732.5
151 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
152 RE DISCCART 457953.8 3777008.9 451.88 1732.5
153 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
154 RE DISCCART 457963.8 3777008.9 451.89 1732.5
155 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
156 RE DISCCART 457973.8 3777008.9 451.96 1732.5
157 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
158 RE DISCCART 457983.8 3777008.9 452.05 1732.5
159 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
160 RE DISCCART 457993.8 3777008.9 452.05 1732.5
161 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
162 RE DISCCART 458003.8 3777008.9 452.05 1732.5
163 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
164 RE DISCCART 458013.8 3777008.9 452.08 1732.5
165 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
166 RE DISCCART 458023.8 3777008.9 452.13 1732.5
167 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
168 RE DISCCART 458033.8 3777008.9 452.18 1732.5
169 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
170 RE DISCCART 458043.8 3777008.9 452.24 1732.5
171 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
172 RE DISCCART 458053.8 3777008.9 452.27 1732.5
173 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
174 RE DISCCART 458063.8 3777008.9 452.28 1732.5
175 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
176 RE DISCCART 458073.8 3777008.9 452.34 1732.5
177 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
178 RE DISCCART 458083.8 3777008.9 452.46 1732.5
179 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
180 RE DISCCART 458093.8 3777008.9 452.58 1732.5
181 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
182 RE DISCCART 458103.8 3777008.9 452.63 1732.5
183 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
184 RE DISCCART 458113.8 3777008.9 452.7 1732.5
185 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
186 RE DISCCART 458123.8 3777008.9 452.77 1732.5
187 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
188 RE DISCCART 458133.8 3777008.9 452.81 1732.5
189 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
190 RE DISCCART 458143.8 3777008.9 452.95 1732.5
191 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
192 RE DISCCART 458153.8 3777008.9 453.05 1732.5
193 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
194 RE DISCCART 458163.8 3777008.9 453.08 1732.5
195 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
196 RE DISCCART 457753.8 3777018.9 451.27 1732.5 332
197 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
198 RE DISCCART 457763.8 3777018.9 451.31 1732.5
199 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
200 RE DISCCART 457773.8 3777018.9 451.38 1732.5
201 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
202 RE DISCCART 457783.8 3777018.9 451.46 1732.5
203 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
204 RE DISCCART 457793.8 3777018.9 451.55 1732.5
205 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
206 RE DISCCART 457803.8 3777018.9 451.59 1732.5
207 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
208 RE DISCCART 457813.8 3777018.9 451.68 1732.5
209 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
210 RE DISCCART 457823.8 3777018.9 451.74 1732.5
211 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
212 RE DISCCART 457833.8 3777018.9 451.78 1732.5
213 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
214 RE DISCCART 457843.8 3777018.9 451.83 1732.5
215 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
216 RE DISCCART 457853.8 3777018.9 451.87 1732.5
217 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
218 RE DISCCART 457863.8 3777018.9 451.95 1732.5
219 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
220 RE DISCCART 457873.8 3777018.9 452.05 1732.5
221 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
222 RE DISCCART 457883.8 3777018.9 452.05 1732.5
223 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
224 RE DISCCART 457893.8 3777018.9 452.05 1732.5
225 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
226 RE DISCCART 457903.8 3777018.9 452.08 1732.5
227 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
228 RE DISCCART 457913.8 3777018.9 452.12 1732.5
229 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
230 RE DISCCART 457923.8 3777018.9 452.12 1732.5
231 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
232 RE DISCCART 457933.8 3777018.9 452.13 1732.5
233 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
234 RE DISCCART 457943.8 3777018.9 452.15 1732.5
235 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
236 RE DISCCART 457953.8 3777018.9 452.18 1732.5
237 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
238 RE DISCCART 457963.8 3777018.9 452.22 1732.5
239 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
240 RE DISCCART 457973.8 3777018.9 452.24 1732.5
241 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
242 RE DISCCART 457983.8 3777018.9 452.27 1732.5
243 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
244 RE DISCCART 457993.8 3777018.9 452.27 1732.5
245 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
246 RE DISCCART 458003.8 3777018.9 452.27 1732.5
247 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
248 RE DISCCART 458013.8 3777018.9 452.28 1732.5
249 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
250 RE DISCCART 458023.8 3777018.9 452.33 1732.5
251 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
252 RE DISCCART 458033.8 3777018.9 452.38 1732.5
253 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
254 RE DISCCART 458043.8 3777018.9 452.46 1732.5
255 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
256 RE DISCCART 458053.8 3777018.9 452.55 1732.5
257 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
258 RE DISCCART 458063.8 3777018.9 452.59 1732.5
259 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
260 RE DISCCART 458073.8 3777018.9 452.68 1732.5
261 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
262 RE DISCCART 458083.8 3777018.9 452.74 1732.5 333
263 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
264 RE DISCCART 458093.8 3777018.9 452.78 1732.5
265 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
266 RE DISCCART 458103.8 3777018.9 452.83 1732.5
267 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
268 RE DISCCART 458113.8 3777018.9 452.95 1732.5
269 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
270 RE DISCCART 458123.8 3777018.9 453.05 1732.5
271 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
272 RE DISCCART 458133.8 3777018.9 453.09 1732.5
273 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
274 RE DISCCART 458143.8 3777018.9 453.18 1732.5
275 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
276 RE DISCCART 458153.8 3777018.9 453.24 1732.5
277 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
278 RE DISCCART 458163.8 3777018.9 453.28 1732.5
279 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
280 RE DISCCART 457753.8 3777028.9 451.55 1732.5
281 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
282 RE DISCCART 457763.8 3777028.9 451.58 1732.5
283 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
284 RE DISCCART 457773.8 3777028.9 451.67 1732.5
285 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
286 RE DISCCART 457783.8 3777028.9 451.74 1732.5
287 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
288 RE DISCCART 457793.8 3777028.9 451.77 1732.5
289 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
290 RE DISCCART 457803.8 3777028.9 451.81 1732.5
291 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
292 RE DISCCART 457813.8 3777028.9 451.87 1732.5
293 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
294 RE DISCCART 457823.8 3777028.9 451.95 1732.5
295 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
296 RE DISCCART 457833.8 3777028.9 452.08 1732.5
297 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
298 RE DISCCART 457843.8 3777028.9 452.12 1732.5
299 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
300 RE DISCCART 457853.8 3777028.9 452.13 1732.5
301 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
302 RE DISCCART 457863.8 3777028.9 452.18 1732.5
303 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
304 RE DISCCART 457873.8 3777028.9 452.22 1732.5
305 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
306 RE DISCCART 457883.8 3777028.9 452.24 1732.5
307 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
308 RE DISCCART 457893.8 3777028.9 452.27 1732.5
309 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
310 RE DISCCART 457903.8 3777028.9 452.27 1732.5
311 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
312 RE DISCCART 457913.8 3777028.9 452.27 1732.5
313 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
314 RE DISCCART 457923.8 3777028.9 452.28 1732.5
315 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
316 RE DISCCART 457933.8 3777028.9 452.33 1732.5
317 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
318 RE DISCCART 457943.8 3777028.9 452.37 1732.5
319 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
320 RE DISCCART 457953.8 3777028.9 452.38 1732.5
321 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
322 RE DISCCART 457963.8 3777028.9 452.39 1732.5
323 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
324 RE DISCCART 457973.8 3777028.9 452.46 1732.5
325 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
326 RE DISCCART 457983.8 3777028.9 452.55 1732.5
327 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
328 RE DISCCART 457993.8 3777028.9 452.55 1732.5 334
329 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
330 RE DISCCART 458003.8 3777028.9 452.55 1732.5
331 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
332 RE DISCCART 458013.8 3777028.9 452.58 1732.5
333 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
334 RE DISCCART 458023.8 3777028.9 452.63 1732.5
335 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
336 RE DISCCART 458033.8 3777028.9 452.68 1732.5
337 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
338 RE DISCCART 458043.8 3777028.9 452.74 1732.5
339 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
340 RE DISCCART 458053.8 3777028.9 452.78 1732.5
341 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
342 RE DISCCART 458063.8 3777028.9 452.83 1732.5
343 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
344 RE DISCCART 458073.8 3777028.9 452.88 1732.5
345 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
346 RE DISCCART 458083.8 3777028.9 452.96 1732.5
347 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
348 RE DISCCART 458093.8 3777028.9 453.08 1732.5
349 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
350 RE DISCCART 458103.8 3777028.9 453.13 1732.5
351 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
352 RE DISCCART 458113.8 3777028.9 453.2 1732.5
353 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
354 RE DISCCART 458123.8 3777028.9 453.27 1732.5
355 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
356 RE DISCCART 458133.8 3777028.9 453.31 1732.5
357 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
358 RE DISCCART 458143.8 3777028.9 453.38 1732.5
359 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
360 RE DISCCART 458153.8 3777028.9 453.46 1732.5
361 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
362 RE DISCCART 458163.8 3777028.9 453.58 1732.5
363 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
364 RE DISCCART 457753.8 3777038.9 451.74 1732.5
365 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
366 RE DISCCART 457763.8 3777038.9 451.77 1732.5
367 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
368 RE DISCCART 457773.8 3777038.9 451.81 1732.5
369 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
370 RE DISCCART 457783.8 3777038.9 451.95 1732.5
371 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
372 RE DISCCART 457793.8 3777038.9 452.05 1732.5
373 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
374 RE DISCCART 457803.8 3777038.9 452.08 1732.5
375 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
376 RE DISCCART 457813.8 3777038.9 452.13 1732.5
377 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
378 RE DISCCART 457823.8 3777038.9 452.18 1732.5
379 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
380 RE DISCCART 457833.8 3777038.9 452.24 1732.5
381 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
382 RE DISCCART 457843.8 3777038.9 452.27 1732.5
383 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
384 RE DISCCART 457853.8 3777038.9 452.31 1732.5
385 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
386 RE DISCCART 457863.8 3777038.9 452.37 1732.5
387 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
388 RE DISCCART 457873.8 3777038.9 452.38 1732.5
389 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
390 RE DISCCART 457883.8 3777038.9 452.46 1732.5
391 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
392 RE DISCCART 457893.8 3777038.9 452.55 1732.5
393 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
394 RE DISCCART 457903.8 3777038.9 452.55 1732.5 335
395 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
396 RE DISCCART 457913.8 3777038.9 452.55 1732.5
397 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
398 RE DISCCART 457923.8 3777038.9 452.58 1732.5
399 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
400 RE DISCCART 457933.8 3777038.9 452.62 1732.5
401 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
402 RE DISCCART 457943.8 3777038.9 452.63 1732.5
403 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
404 RE DISCCART 457953.8 3777038.9 452.68 1732.5
405 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
406 RE DISCCART 457963.8 3777038.9 452.72 1732.5
407 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
408 RE DISCCART 457973.8 3777038.9 452.74 1732.5
409 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
410 RE DISCCART 457983.8 3777038.9 452.77 1732.5
411 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
412 RE DISCCART 457993.8 3777038.9 452.77 1732.5
413 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
414 RE DISCCART 458003.8 3777038.9 452.78 1732.5
415 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
416 RE DISCCART 458013.8 3777038.9 452.79 1732.5
417 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
418 RE DISCCART 458023.8 3777038.9 452.84 1732.5
419 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
420 RE DISCCART 458033.8 3777038.9 452.89 1732.5
421 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
422 RE DISCCART 458043.8 3777038.9 452.96 1732.5
423 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
424 RE DISCCART 458053.8 3777038.9 453.08 1732.5
425 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
426 RE DISCCART 458063.8 3777038.9 453.13 1732.5
427 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
428 RE DISCCART 458073.8 3777038.9 453.2 1732.5
429 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
430 RE DISCCART 458083.8 3777038.9 453.27 1732.5
431 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
432 RE DISCCART 458093.8 3777038.9 453.28 1732.5
433 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
434 RE DISCCART 458103.8 3777038.9 453.33 1732.5
435 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
436 RE DISCCART 458113.8 3777038.9 453.45 1732.5
437 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
438 RE DISCCART 458123.8 3777038.9 453.55 1732.5
439 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
440 RE DISCCART 458133.8 3777038.9 453.59 1732.5
441 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
442 RE DISCCART 458143.8 3777038.9 453.68 1732.5
443 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
444 RE DISCCART 458153.8 3777038.9 453.74 1732.5
445 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
446 RE DISCCART 458163.8 3777038.9 453.77 1732.5
447 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
448 RE DISCCART 457753.8 3777048.9 451.95 1732.5
449 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
450 RE DISCCART 457763.8 3777048.9 452.05 1732.5
451 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
452 RE DISCCART 457773.8 3777048.9 452.08 1732.5
453 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
454 RE DISCCART 457783.8 3777048.9 452.17 1732.5
455 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
456 RE DISCCART 457793.8 3777048.9 452.24 1732.5
457 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
458 RE DISCCART 457803.8 3777048.9 452.27 1732.5
459 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
460 RE DISCCART 457813.8 3777048.9 452.31 1732.5 336
461 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
462 RE DISCCART 457823.8 3777048.9 452.37 1732.5
463 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
464 RE DISCCART 457833.8 3777048.9 452.45 1732.5
465 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
466 RE DISCCART 457843.8 3777048.9 452.55 1732.5
467 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
468 RE DISCCART 457853.8 3777048.9 452.58 1732.5
469 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
470 RE DISCCART 457863.8 3777048.9 452.62 1732.5
471 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
472 RE DISCCART 457873.8 3777048.9 452.67 1732.5
473 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
474 RE DISCCART 457883.8 3777048.9 452.72 1732.5
475 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
476 RE DISCCART 457893.8 3777048.9 452.74 1732.5
477 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
478 RE DISCCART 457903.8 3777048.9 452.77 1732.5
479 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
480 RE DISCCART 457913.8 3777048.9 452.77 1732.5
481 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
482 RE DISCCART 457923.8 3777048.9 452.78 1732.5
483 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
484 RE DISCCART 457933.8 3777048.9 452.79 1732.5
485 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
486 RE DISCCART 457943.8 3777048.9 452.83 1732.5
487 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
488 RE DISCCART 457953.8 3777048.9 452.87 1732.5
489 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
490 RE DISCCART 457963.8 3777048.9 452.88 1732.5
491 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
492 RE DISCCART 457973.8 3777048.9 452.96 1732.5
493 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
494 RE DISCCART 457983.8 3777048.9 453.05 1732.5
495 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
496 RE DISCCART 457993.8 3777048.9 453.05 1732.5
497 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
498 RE DISCCART 458003.8 3777048.9 453.08 1732.5
499 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
500 RE DISCCART 458013.8 3777048.9 453.13 1732.5
501 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
502 RE DISCCART 458023.8 3777048.9 453.18 1732.5
503 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
504 RE DISCCART 458033.8 3777048.9 453.24 1732.5
505 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
506 RE DISCCART 458043.8 3777048.9 453.27 1732.5
507 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
508 RE DISCCART 458053.8 3777048.9 453.28 1732.5
509 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
510 RE DISCCART 458063.8 3777048.9 453.33 1732.5
511 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
512 RE DISCCART 458073.8 3777048.9 453.45 1732.5
513 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
514 RE DISCCART 458083.8 3777048.9 453.55 1732.5
515 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
516 RE DISCCART 458093.8 3777048.9 453.58 1732.5
517 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
518 RE DISCCART 458103.8 3777048.9 453.63 1732.5
519 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
520 RE DISCCART 458113.8 3777048.9 453.7 1732.5
521 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
522 RE DISCCART 458123.8 3777048.9 453.77 1732.5
523 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
524 RE DISCCART 458133.8 3777048.9 453.81 1732.5
525 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
526 RE DISCCART 458143.8 3777048.9 453.88 1732.5 337
527 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
528 RE DISCCART 458153.8 3777048.9 453.96 1732.5
529 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
530 RE DISCCART 458163.8 3777048.9 454.05 1732.5
531 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
532 RE DISCCART 457753.8 3777058.9 452.17 1732.5
533 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
534 RE DISCCART 457763.8 3777058.9 452.24 1732.5
535 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
536 RE DISCCART 457773.8 3777058.9 452.28 1732.5
537 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
538 RE DISCCART 457783.8 3777058.9 452.33 1732.5
539 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
540 RE DISCCART 457793.8 3777058.9 452.45 1732.5
541 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
542 RE DISCCART 457803.8 3777058.9 452.55 1732.5
543 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
544 RE DISCCART 457813.8 3777058.9 452.58 1732.5
545 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
546 RE DISCCART 457823.8 3777058.9 452.63 1732.5
547 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
548 RE DISCCART 457833.8 3777058.9 452.68 1732.5
549 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
550 RE DISCCART 457843.8 3777058.9 452.74 1732.5
551 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
552 RE DISCCART 457853.8 3777058.9 452.77 1732.5
553 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
554 RE DISCCART 457863.8 3777058.9 452.78 1732.5
555 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
556 RE DISCCART 457873.8 3777058.9 452.83 1732.5
557 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
558 RE DISCCART 457883.8 3777058.9 452.87 1732.5
559 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
560 RE DISCCART 457893.8 3777058.9 452.95 1732.5
561 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
562 RE DISCCART 457903.8 3777058.9 453.05 1732.5
563 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
564 RE DISCCART 457913.8 3777058.9 453.05 1732.5
565 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
566 RE DISCCART 457923.8 3777058.9 453.08 1732.5
567 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
568 RE DISCCART 457933.8 3777058.9 453.12 1732.5
569 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
570 RE DISCCART 457943.8 3777058.9 453.13 1732.5
571 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
572 RE DISCCART 457953.8 3777058.9 453.15 1732.5
573 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
574 RE DISCCART 457963.8 3777058.9 453.18 1732.5
575 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
576 RE DISCCART 457973.8 3777058.9 453.24 1732.5
577 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
578 RE DISCCART 457983.8 3777058.9 453.27 1732.5
579 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
580 RE DISCCART 457993.8 3777058.9 453.27 1732.5
581 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
582 RE DISCCART 458003.8 3777058.9 453.28 1732.5
583 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
584 RE DISCCART 458013.8 3777058.9 453.33 1732.5
585 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
586 RE DISCCART 458023.8 3777058.9 453.38 1732.5
587 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
588 RE DISCCART 458033.8 3777058.9 453.46 1732.5
589 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
590 RE DISCCART 458043.8 3777058.9 453.55 1732.5
591 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
592 RE DISCCART 458053.8 3777058.9 453.58 1732.5 338
593 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
594 RE DISCCART 458063.8 3777058.9 453.63 1732.5
595 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
596 RE DISCCART 458073.8 3777058.9 453.7 1732.5
597 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
598 RE DISCCART 458083.8 3777058.9 453.77 1732.5
599 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
600 RE DISCCART 458093.8 3777058.9 453.78 1732.5
601 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
602 RE DISCCART 458103.8 3777058.9 453.83 1732.5
603 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
604 RE DISCCART 458113.8 3777058.9 453.95 1732.5
605 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
606 RE DISCCART 458123.8 3777058.9 454.05 1732.5
607 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
608 RE DISCCART 458133.8 3777058.9 454.08 1732.5
609 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
610 RE DISCCART 458143.8 3777058.9 454.17 1732.5
611 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
612 RE DISCCART 458153.8 3777058.9 454.24 1732.5
613 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
614 RE DISCCART 458163.8 3777058.9 454.27 1732.5
615 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
616 RE DISCCART 457753.8 3777068.9 452.33 1732.5
617 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
618 RE DISCCART 457763.8 3777068.9 452.45 1732.5
619 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
620 RE DISCCART 457773.8 3777068.9 452.58 1732.5
621 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
622 RE DISCCART 457783.8 3777068.9 452.62 1732.5
623 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
624 RE DISCCART 457793.8 3777068.9 452.67 1732.5
625 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
626 RE DISCCART 457803.8 3777068.9 452.74 1732.5
627 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
628 RE DISCCART 457813.8 3777068.9 452.77 1732.5
629 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
630 RE DISCCART 457823.8 3777068.9 452.81 1732.5
631 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
632 RE DISCCART 457833.8 3777068.9 452.87 1732.5
633 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
634 RE DISCCART 457843.8 3777068.9 452.95 1732.5
635 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
636 RE DISCCART 457853.8 3777068.9 453.05 1732.5
637 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
638 RE DISCCART 457863.8 3777068.9 453.08 1732.5
639 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
640 RE DISCCART 457873.8 3777068.9 453.12 1732.5
641 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
642 RE DISCCART 457883.8 3777068.9 453.13 1732.5
643 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
644 RE DISCCART 457893.8 3777068.9 453.18 1732.5
645 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
646 RE DISCCART 457903.8 3777068.9 453.24 1732.5
647 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
648 RE DISCCART 457913.8 3777068.9 453.27 1732.5
649 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
650 RE DISCCART 457923.8 3777068.9 453.27 1732.5
651 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
652 RE DISCCART 457933.8 3777068.9 453.28 1732.5
653 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
654 RE DISCCART 457943.8 3777068.9 453.33 1732.5
655 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
656 RE DISCCART 457953.8 3777068.9 453.37 1732.5
657 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
658 RE DISCCART 457963.8 3777068.9 453.38 1732.5 339
659 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
660 RE DISCCART 457973.8 3777068.9 453.46 1732.5
661 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
662 RE DISCCART 457983.8 3777068.9 453.55 1732.5
663 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
664 RE DISCCART 457993.8 3777068.9 453.55 1732.5
665 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
666 RE DISCCART 458003.8 3777068.9 453.58 1732.5
667 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
668 RE DISCCART 458013.8 3777068.9 453.63 1732.5
669 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
670 RE DISCCART 458023.8 3777068.9 453.68 1732.5
671 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
672 RE DISCCART 458033.8 3777068.9 453.74 1732.5
673 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
674 RE DISCCART 458043.8 3777068.9 453.77 1732.5
675 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
676 RE DISCCART 458053.8 3777068.9 453.78 1732.5
677 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
678 RE DISCCART 458063.8 3777068.9 453.84 1732.5
679 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
680 RE DISCCART 458073.8 3777068.9 453.96 1732.5
681 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
682 RE DISCCART 458083.8 3777068.9 454.05 1732.5
683 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
684 RE DISCCART 458093.8 3777068.9 454.08 1732.5
685 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
686 RE DISCCART 458103.8 3777068.9 454.13 1732.5
687 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
688 RE DISCCART 458113.8 3777068.9 454.2 1732.5
689 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
690 RE DISCCART 458123.8 3777068.9 454.27 1732.5
691 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
692 RE DISCCART 458133.8 3777068.9 454.28 1732.5
693 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
694 RE DISCCART 458143.8 3777068.9 454.33 1732.5
695 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
696 RE DISCCART 458153.8 3777068.9 454.45 1732.5
697 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
698 RE DISCCART 458163.8 3777068.9 454.55 1732.5
699 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
700 RE DISCCART 457753.8 3777078.9 452.63 1732.5
701 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
702 RE DISCCART 457763.8 3777078.9 452.68 1732.5
703 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
704 RE DISCCART 457773.8 3777078.9 452.74 1732.5
705 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
706 RE DISCCART 457783.8 3777078.9 452.78 1732.5
707 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
708 RE DISCCART 457793.8 3777078.9 452.83 1732.5
709 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
710 RE DISCCART 457803.8 3777078.9 452.95 1732.5
711 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
712 RE DISCCART 457813.8 3777078.9 453.05 1732.5
713 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
714 RE DISCCART 457823.8 3777078.9 453.08 1732.5
715 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
716 RE DISCCART 457833.8 3777078.9 453.12 1732.5
717 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
718 RE DISCCART 457843.8 3777078.9 453.17 1732.5
719 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
720 RE DISCCART 457853.8 3777078.9 453.24 1732.5
721 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
722 RE DISCCART 457863.8 3777078.9 453.27 1732.5
723 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
724 RE DISCCART 457873.8 3777078.9 453.27 1732.5 340
725 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
726 RE DISCCART 457883.8 3777078.9 453.31 1732.5
727 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
728 RE DISCCART 457893.8 3777078.9 453.37 1732.5
729 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
730 RE DISCCART 457903.8 3777078.9 453.45 1732.5
731 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
732 RE DISCCART 457913.8 3777078.9 453.55 1732.5
733 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
734 RE DISCCART 457923.8 3777078.9 453.55 1732.5
735 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
736 RE DISCCART 457933.8 3777078.9 453.58 1732.5
737 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
738 RE DISCCART 457943.8 3777078.9 453.63 1732.5
739 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
740 RE DISCCART 457953.8 3777078.9 453.65 1732.5
741 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
742 RE DISCCART 457963.8 3777078.9 453.68 1732.5
743 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
744 RE DISCCART 457973.8 3777078.9 453.74 1732.5
745 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
746 RE DISCCART 457983.8 3777078.9 453.77 1732.5
747 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
748 RE DISCCART 457993.8 3777078.9 453.78 1732.5
749 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
750 RE DISCCART 458003.8 3777078.9 453.79 1732.5
751 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
752 RE DISCCART 458013.8 3777078.9 453.83 1732.5
753 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
754 RE DISCCART 458023.8 3777078.9 453.88 1732.5
755 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
756 RE DISCCART 458033.8 3777078.9 453.96 1732.5
757 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
758 RE DISCCART 458043.8 3777078.9 454.05 1732.5
759 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
760 RE DISCCART 458053.8 3777078.9 454.09 1732.5
761 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
762 RE DISCCART 458063.8 3777078.9 454.18 1732.5
763 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
764 RE DISCCART 458073.8 3777078.9 454.24 1732.5
765 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
766 RE DISCCART 458083.8 3777078.9 454.27 1732.5
767 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
768 RE DISCCART 458093.8 3777078.9 454.28 1732.5
769 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
770 RE DISCCART 458103.8 3777078.9 454.34 1732.5
771 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
772 RE DISCCART 458113.8 3777078.9 454.46 1732.5
773 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
774 RE DISCCART 458123.8 3777078.9 454.55 1732.5
775 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
776 RE DISCCART 458133.8 3777078.9 454.58 1732.5
777 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
778 RE DISCCART 458143.8 3777078.9 454.63 1732.5
779 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
780 RE DISCCART 458153.8 3777078.9 454.68 1732.5
781 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
782 RE DISCCART 458163.8 3777078.9 454.74 1732.5
783 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
784 RE DISCCART 457753.8 3777088.9 452.81 1732.5
785 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
786 RE DISCCART 457763.8 3777088.9 452.88 1732.5
787 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
788 RE DISCCART 457773.8 3777088.9 452.96 1732.5
789 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
790 RE DISCCART 457783.8 3777088.9 453.08 1732.5 341
791 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
792 RE DISCCART 457793.8 3777088.9 453.12 1732.5
793 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
794 RE DISCCART 457803.8 3777088.9 453.17 1732.5
795 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
796 RE DISCCART 457813.8 3777088.9 453.24 1732.5
797 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
798 RE DISCCART 457823.8 3777088.9 453.27 1732.5
799 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
800 RE DISCCART 457833.8 3777088.9 453.28 1732.5
801 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
802 RE DISCCART 457843.8 3777088.9 453.33 1732.5
803 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
804 RE DISCCART 457853.8 3777088.9 453.45 1732.5
805 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
806 RE DISCCART 457863.8 3777088.9 453.55 1732.5
807 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
808 RE DISCCART 457873.8 3777088.9 453.55 1732.5
809 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
810 RE DISCCART 457883.8 3777088.9 453.58 1732.5
811 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
812 RE DISCCART 457893.8 3777088.9 453.63 1732.5
813 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
814 RE DISCCART 457903.8 3777088.9 453.68 1732.5
815 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
816 RE DISCCART 457913.8 3777088.9 453.74 1732.5
817 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
818 RE DISCCART 457923.8 3777088.9 453.77 1732.5
819 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
820 RE DISCCART 457933.8 3777088.9 453.78 1732.5
821 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
822 RE DISCCART 457943.8 3777088.9 453.83 1732.5
823 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
824 RE DISCCART 457953.8 3777088.9 453.88 1732.5
825 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
826 RE DISCCART 457963.8 3777088.9 453.89 1732.5
827 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
828 RE DISCCART 457973.8 3777088.9 453.96 1732.5
829 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
830 RE DISCCART 457983.8 3777088.9 454.05 1732.5
831 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
832 RE DISCCART 457993.8 3777088.9 454.08 1732.5
833 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
834 RE DISCCART 458003.8 3777088.9 454.13 1732.5
835 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
836 RE DISCCART 458013.8 3777088.9 454.15 1732.5
837 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
838 RE DISCCART 458023.8 3777088.9 454.2 1732.5
839 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
840 RE DISCCART 458033.8 3777088.9 454.27 1732.5
841 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
842 RE DISCCART 458043.8 3777088.9 454.28 1732.5
843 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
844 RE DISCCART 458053.8 3777088.9 454.33 1732.5
845 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
846 RE DISCCART 458063.8 3777088.9 454.38 1732.5
847 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
848 RE DISCCART 458073.8 3777088.9 454.46 1732.5
849 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
850 RE DISCCART 458083.8 3777088.9 454.55 1732.5
851 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
852 RE DISCCART 458093.8 3777088.9 454.58 1732.5
853 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
854 RE DISCCART 458103.8 3777088.9 454.67 1732.5
855 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
856 RE DISCCART 458113.8 3777088.9 454.74 1732.5 342
857 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
858 RE DISCCART 458123.8 3777088.9 454.77 1732.5
859 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
860 RE DISCCART 458133.8 3777088.9 454.78 1732.5
861 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
862 RE DISCCART 458143.8 3777088.9 454.83 1732.5
863 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
864 RE DISCCART 458153.8 3777088.9 454.88 1732.5
865 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
866 RE DISCCART 458163.8 3777088.9 454.96 1732.5
867 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
868 RE DISCCART 457753.8 3777098.9 453.08 1732.5
869 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
870 RE DISCCART 457763.8 3777098.9 453.17 1732.5
871 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
872 RE DISCCART 457773.8 3777098.9 453.24 1732.5
873 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
874 RE DISCCART 457783.8 3777098.9 453.27 1732.5
875 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
876 RE DISCCART 457793.8 3777098.9 453.28 1732.5
877 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
878 RE DISCCART 457803.8 3777098.9 453.33 1732.5
879 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
880 RE DISCCART 457813.8 3777098.9 453.45 1732.5
881 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
882 RE DISCCART 457823.8 3777098.9 453.55 1732.5
883 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
884 RE DISCCART 457833.8 3777098.9 453.58 1732.5
885 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
886 RE DISCCART 457843.8 3777098.9 453.62 1732.5
887 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
888 RE DISCCART 457853.8 3777098.9 453.67 1732.5
889 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
890 RE DISCCART 457863.8 3777098.9 453.72 1732.5
891 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
892 RE DISCCART 457873.8 3777098.9 453.74 1732.5
893 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
894 RE DISCCART 457883.8 3777098.9 453.77 1732.5
895 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
896 RE DISCCART 457893.8 3777098.9 453.81 1732.5
897 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
898 RE DISCCART 457903.8 3777098.9 453.87 1732.5
899 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
900 RE DISCCART 457913.8 3777098.9 453.95 1732.5
901 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
902 RE DISCCART 457923.8 3777098.9 454.05 1732.5
903 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
904 RE DISCCART 457933.8 3777098.9 454.08 1732.5
905 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
906 RE DISCCART 457943.8 3777098.9 454.12 1732.5
907 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
908 RE DISCCART 457953.8 3777098.9 454.17 1732.5
909 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
910 RE DISCCART 457963.8 3777098.9 454.24 1732.5
911 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
912 RE DISCCART 457973.8 3777098.9 454.27 1732.5
913 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
914 RE DISCCART 457983.8 3777098.9 454.27 1732.5
915 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
916 RE DISCCART 457993.8 3777098.9 454.28 1732.5
917 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
918 RE DISCCART 458003.8 3777098.9 454.33 1732.5
919 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
920 RE DISCCART 458013.8 3777098.9 454.38 1732.5
921 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
922 RE DISCCART 458023.8 3777098.9 454.46 1732.5 343
923 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
924 RE DISCCART 458033.8 3777098.9 454.55 1732.5
925 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
926 RE DISCCART 458043.8 3777098.9 454.58 1732.5
927 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
928 RE DISCCART 458053.8 3777098.9 454.63 1732.5
929 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
930 RE DISCCART 458063.8 3777098.9 454.68 1732.5
931 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
932 RE DISCCART 458073.8 3777098.9 454.74 1732.5
933 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
934 RE DISCCART 458083.8 3777098.9 454.77 1732.5
935 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
936 RE DISCCART 458093.8 3777098.9 454.78 1732.5
937 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
938 RE DISCCART 458103.8 3777098.9 454.83 1732.5
939 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
940 RE DISCCART 458113.8 3777098.9 454.95 1732.5
941 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
942 RE DISCCART 458123.8 3777098.9 455.05 1732.5
943 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
944 RE DISCCART 458133.8 3777098.9 455.08 1732.5
945 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
946 RE DISCCART 458143.8 3777098.9 455.13 1732.5
947 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
948 RE DISCCART 458153.8 3777098.9 455.18 1732.5
949 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
950 RE DISCCART 458163.8 3777098.9 455.24 1732.5
951 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
952 RE DISCCART 457753.8 3777108.9 453.27 1732.5
953 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
954 RE DISCCART 457763.8 3777108.9 453.31 1732.5
955 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
956 RE DISCCART 457773.8 3777108.9 453.45 1732.5
957 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
958 RE DISCCART 457783.8 3777108.9 453.55 1732.5
959 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
960 RE DISCCART 457793.8 3777108.9 453.58 1732.5
961 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
962 RE DISCCART 457803.8 3777108.9 453.63 1732.5
963 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
964 RE DISCCART 457813.8 3777108.9 453.68 1732.5
965 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
966 RE DISCCART 457823.8 3777108.9 453.74 1732.5
967 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
968 RE DISCCART 457833.8 3777108.9 453.77 1732.5
969 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
970 RE DISCCART 457843.8 3777108.9 453.78 1732.5
971 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
972 RE DISCCART 457853.8 3777108.9 453.83 1732.5
973 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
974 RE DISCCART 457863.8 3777108.9 453.88 1732.5
975 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
976 RE DISCCART 457873.8 3777108.9 453.96 1732.5
977 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
978 RE DISCCART 457883.8 3777108.9 454.05 1732.5
979 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
980 RE DISCCART 457893.8 3777108.9 454.08 1732.5
981 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
982 RE DISCCART 457903.8 3777108.9 454.13 1732.5
983 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
984 RE DISCCART 457913.8 3777108.9 454.18 1732.5
985 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
986 RE DISCCART 457923.8 3777108.9 454.24 1732.5
987 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
988 RE DISCCART 457933.8 3777108.9 454.27 1732.5 344
989 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
990 RE DISCCART 457943.8 3777108.9 454.28 1732.5
991 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
992 RE DISCCART 457953.8 3777108.9 454.34 1732.5
993 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
994 RE DISCCART 457963.8 3777108.9 454.46 1732.5
995 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
996 RE DISCCART 457973.8 3777108.9 454.55 1732.5
997 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
998 RE DISCCART 457983.8 3777108.9 454.55 1732.5
999 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1000 RE DISCCART 457993.8 3777108.9 454.58 1732.5
1001 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1002 RE DISCCART 458003.8 3777108.9 454.63 1732.5
1003 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1004 RE DISCCART 458013.8 3777108.9 454.68 1732.5
1005 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1006 RE DISCCART 458023.8 3777108.9 454.74 1732.5
1007 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1008 RE DISCCART 458033.8 3777108.9 454.77 1732.5
1009 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1010 RE DISCCART 458043.8 3777108.9 454.78 1732.5
1011 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1012 RE DISCCART 458053.8 3777108.9 454.83 1732.5
1013 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1014 RE DISCCART 458063.8 3777108.9 454.88 1732.5
1015 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1016 RE DISCCART 458073.8 3777108.9 454.96 1732.5
1017 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1018 RE DISCCART 458083.8 3777108.9 455.05 1732.5
1019 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1020 RE DISCCART 458093.8 3777108.9 455.08 1732.5
1021 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1022 RE DISCCART 458103.8 3777108.9 455.13 1732.5
1023 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1024 RE DISCCART 458113.8 3777108.9 455.18 1732.5
1025 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1026 RE DISCCART 458123.8 3777108.9 455.24 1732.5
1027 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1028 RE DISCCART 458133.8 3777108.9 455.28 1732.5
1029 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1030 RE DISCCART 458143.8 3777108.9 455.33 1732.5
1031 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1032 RE DISCCART 458153.8 3777108.9 455.38 1732.5
1033 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1034 RE DISCCART 458163.8 3777108.9 455.46 1732.5
1035 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1036 RE DISCCART 457753.8 3777118.9 453.55 1732.5
1037 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1038 RE DISCCART 457763.8 3777118.9 453.58 1732.5
1039 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1040 RE DISCCART 457773.8 3777118.9 453.67 1732.5
1041 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1042 RE DISCCART 457783.8 3777118.9 453.72 1732.5
1043 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1044 RE DISCCART 457793.8 3777118.9 453.74 1732.5
1045 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1046 RE DISCCART 457803.8 3777118.9 453.81 1732.5
1047 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1048 RE DISCCART 457813.8 3777118.9 453.87 1732.5
1049 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1050 RE DISCCART 457823.8 3777118.9 453.95 1732.5
1051 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1052 RE DISCCART 457833.8 3777118.9 454.05 1732.5
1053 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1054 RE DISCCART 457843.8 3777118.9 454.08 1732.5 345
1055 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1056 RE DISCCART 457853.8 3777118.9 454.12 1732.5
1057 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1058 RE DISCCART 457863.8 3777118.9 454.17 1732.5
1059 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1060 RE DISCCART 457873.8 3777118.9 454.22 1732.5
1061 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1062 RE DISCCART 457883.8 3777118.9 454.24 1732.5
1063 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1064 RE DISCCART 457893.8 3777118.9 454.28 1732.5
1065 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1066 RE DISCCART 457903.8 3777118.9 454.33 1732.5
1067 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1068 RE DISCCART 457913.8 3777118.9 454.38 1732.5
1069 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1070 RE DISCCART 457923.8 3777118.9 454.46 1732.5
1071 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1072 RE DISCCART 457933.8 3777118.9 454.55 1732.5
1073 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1074 RE DISCCART 457943.8 3777118.9 454.58 1732.5
1075 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1076 RE DISCCART 457953.8 3777118.9 454.67 1732.5
1077 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1078 RE DISCCART 457963.8 3777118.9 454.72 1732.5
1079 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1080 RE DISCCART 457973.8 3777118.9 454.74 1732.5
1081 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1082 RE DISCCART 457983.8 3777118.9 454.77 1732.5
1083 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1084 RE DISCCART 457993.8 3777118.9 454.78 1732.5
1085 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1086 RE DISCCART 458003.8 3777118.9 454.83 1732.5
1087 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1088 RE DISCCART 458013.8 3777118.9 454.88 1732.5
1089 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1090 RE DISCCART 458023.8 3777118.9 454.96 1732.5
1091 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1092 RE DISCCART 458033.8 3777118.9 455.05 1732.5
1093 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1094 RE DISCCART 458043.8 3777118.9 455.08 1732.5
1095 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1096 RE DISCCART 458053.8 3777118.9 455.13 1732.5
1097 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1098 RE DISCCART 458063.8 3777118.9 455.18 1732.5
1099 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1100 RE DISCCART 458073.8 3777118.9 455.24 1732.5
1101 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1102 RE DISCCART 458083.8 3777118.9 455.27 1732.5
1103 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1104 RE DISCCART 458093.8 3777118.9 455.28 1732.5
1105 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1106 RE DISCCART 458103.8 3777118.9 455.33 1732.5
1107 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1108 RE DISCCART 458113.8 3777118.9 455.38 1732.5
1109 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1110 RE DISCCART 458123.8 3777118.9 455.46 1732.5
1111 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1112 RE DISCCART 458133.8 3777118.9 455.58 1732.5
1113 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1114 RE DISCCART 458143.8 3777118.9 455.63 1732.5
1115 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1116 RE DISCCART 458153.8 3777118.9 455.68 1732.5
1117 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1118 RE DISCCART 458163.8 3777118.9 455.74 1732.5
1119 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1120 RE DISCCART 457753.8 3777128.9 453.74 1732.5 346
1121 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1122 RE DISCCART 457763.8 3777128.9 453.78 1732.5
1123 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1124 RE DISCCART 457773.8 3777128.9 453.83 1732.5
1125 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1126 RE DISCCART 457783.8 3777128.9 453.88 1732.5
1127 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1128 RE DISCCART 457793.8 3777128.9 453.96 1732.5
1129 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1130 RE DISCCART 457803.8 3777128.9 454.08 1732.5
1131 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1132 RE DISCCART 457813.8 3777128.9 454.13 1732.5
1133 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1134 RE DISCCART 457823.8 3777128.9 454.18 1732.5
1135 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1136 RE DISCCART 457833.8 3777128.9 454.24 1732.5
1137 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1138 RE DISCCART 457843.8 3777128.9 454.27 1732.5
1139 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1140 RE DISCCART 457853.8 3777128.9 454.28 1732.5
1141 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1142 RE DISCCART 457863.8 3777128.9 454.33 1732.5
1143 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1144 RE DISCCART 457873.8 3777128.9 454.38 1732.5
1145 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1146 RE DISCCART 457883.8 3777128.9 454.46 1732.5
1147 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1148 RE DISCCART 457893.8 3777128.9 454.58 1732.5
1149 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1150 RE DISCCART 457903.8 3777128.9 454.63 1732.5
1151 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1152 RE DISCCART 457913.8 3777128.9 454.68 1732.5
1153 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1154 RE DISCCART 457923.8 3777128.9 454.74 1732.5
1155 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1156 RE DISCCART 457933.8 3777128.9 454.77 1732.5
1157 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1158 RE DISCCART 457943.8 3777128.9 454.78 1732.5
1159 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1160 RE DISCCART 457953.8 3777128.9 454.83 1732.5
1161 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1162 RE DISCCART 457963.8 3777128.9 454.88 1732.5
1163 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1164 RE DISCCART 457973.8 3777128.9 454.96 1732.5
1165 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1166 RE DISCCART 457983.8 3777128.9 455.05 1732.5
1167 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1168 RE DISCCART 457993.8 3777128.9 455.08 1732.5
1169 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1170 RE DISCCART 458003.8 3777128.9 455.13 1732.5
1171 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1172 RE DISCCART 458013.8 3777128.9 455.18 1732.5
1173 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1174 RE DISCCART 458023.8 3777128.9 455.24 1732.5
1175 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1176 RE DISCCART 458033.8 3777128.9 455.27 1732.5
1177 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1178 RE DISCCART 458043.8 3777128.9 455.28 1732.5
1179 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1180 RE DISCCART 458053.8 3777128.9 455.33 1732.5
1181 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1182 RE DISCCART 458063.8 3777128.9 455.38 1732.5
1183 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1184 RE DISCCART 458073.8 3777128.9 455.46 1732.5
1185 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1186 RE DISCCART 458083.8 3777128.9 455.55 1732.5 347
1187 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1188 RE DISCCART 458093.8 3777128.9 455.58 1732.5
1189 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1190 RE DISCCART 458103.8 3777128.9 455.63 1732.5
1191 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1192 RE DISCCART 458113.8 3777128.9 455.68 1732.5
1193 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1194 RE DISCCART 458123.8 3777128.9 455.74 1732.5
1195 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1196 RE DISCCART 458133.8 3777128.9 455.78 1732.5
1197 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1198 RE DISCCART 458143.8 3777128.9 455.83 1732.5
1199 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1200 RE DISCCART 458153.8 3777128.9 455.88 1732.5
1201 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1202 RE DISCCART 458163.8 3777128.9 455.96 1732.5
1203 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1204 RE DISCCART 457753.8 3777138.9 453.95 1732.5
1205 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1206 RE DISCCART 457763.8 3777138.9 454.08 1732.5
1207 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1208 RE DISCCART 457773.8 3777138.9 454.12 1732.5
1209 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1210 RE DISCCART 457783.8 3777138.9 454.17 1732.5
1211 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1212 RE DISCCART 457793.8 3777138.9 454.22 1732.5
1213 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1214 RE DISCCART 457803.8 3777138.9 454.24 1732.5
1215 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1216 RE DISCCART 457813.8 3777138.9 454.3 1732.5
1217 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1218 RE DISCCART 457823.8 3777138.9 454.36 1732.5
1219 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1220 RE DISCCART 457833.8 3777138.9 454.45 1732.5
1221 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1222 RE DISCCART 457843.8 3777138.9 454.55 1732.5
1223 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1224 RE DISCCART 457853.8 3777138.9 454.58 1732.5
1225 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1226 RE DISCCART 457863.8 3777138.9 454.62 1732.5
1227 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1228 RE DISCCART 457873.8 3777138.9 454.67 1732.5
1229 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1230 RE DISCCART 457883.8 3777138.9 454.74 1732.5
1231 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1232 RE DISCCART 457893.8 3777138.9 454.77 1732.5
1233 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1234 RE DISCCART 457903.8 3777138.9 454.81 1732.5
1235 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1236 RE DISCCART 457913.8 3777138.9 454.87 1732.5
1237 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1238 RE DISCCART 457923.8 3777138.9 454.95 1732.5
1239 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1240 RE DISCCART 457933.8 3777138.9 455.05 1732.5
1241 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1242 RE DISCCART 457943.8 3777138.9 455.08 1732.5
1243 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1244 RE DISCCART 457953.8 3777138.9 455.13 1732.5
1245 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1246 RE DISCCART 457963.8 3777138.9 455.18 1732.5
1247 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1248 RE DISCCART 457973.8 3777138.9 455.24 1732.5
1249 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1250 RE DISCCART 457983.8 3777138.9 455.27 1732.5
1251 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1252 RE DISCCART 457993.8 3777138.9 455.28 1732.5 348
1253 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1254 RE DISCCART 458003.8 3777138.9 455.33 1732.5
1255 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1256 RE DISCCART 458013.8 3777138.9 455.38 1732.5
1257 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1258 RE DISCCART 458023.8 3777138.9 455.46 1732.5
1259 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1260 RE DISCCART 458033.8 3777138.9 455.55 1732.5
1261 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1262 RE DISCCART 458043.8 3777138.9 455.58 1732.5
1263 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1264 RE DISCCART 458053.8 3777138.9 455.62 1732.5
1265 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1266 RE DISCCART 458063.8 3777138.9 455.67 1732.5
1267 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1268 RE DISCCART 458073.8 3777138.9 455.72 1732.5
1269 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1270 RE DISCCART 458083.8 3777138.9 455.74 1732.5
1271 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1272 RE DISCCART 458093.8 3777138.9 455.78 1732.5
1273 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1274 RE DISCCART 458103.8 3777138.9 455.83 1732.5
1275 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1276 RE DISCCART 458113.8 3777138.9 455.88 1732.5
1277 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1278 RE DISCCART 458123.8 3777138.9 455.96 1732.5
1279 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1280 RE DISCCART 458133.8 3777138.9 456.08 1732.5
1281 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1282 RE DISCCART 458143.8 3777138.9 456.12 1732.5
1283 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1284 RE DISCCART 458153.8 3777138.9 456.17 1732.5
1285 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1286 RE DISCCART 457753.8 3777148.9 454.17 1732.5
1287 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1288 RE DISCCART 457763.8 3777148.9 454.24 1732.5
1289 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1290 RE DISCCART 457773.8 3777148.9 454.27 1732.5
1291 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1292 RE DISCCART 457783.8 3777148.9 454.31 1732.5
1293 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1294 RE DISCCART 457793.8 3777148.9 454.37 1732.5
1295 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1296 RE DISCCART 457803.8 3777148.9 454.45 1732.5
1297 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1298 RE DISCCART 457813.8 3777148.9 454.55 1732.5
1299 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1300 RE DISCCART 457823.8 3777148.9 454.58 1732.5
1301 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1302 RE DISCCART 457833.8 3777148.9 454.67 1732.5
1303 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1304 RE DISCCART 457843.8 3777148.9 454.72 1732.5
1305 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1306 RE DISCCART 457853.8 3777148.9 454.74 1732.5
1307 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1308 RE DISCCART 457863.8 3777148.9 454.77 1732.5
1309 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1310 RE DISCCART 457873.8 3777148.9 454.81 1732.5
1311 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1312 RE DISCCART 457883.8 3777148.9 454.95 1732.5
1313 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1314 RE DISCCART 457893.8 3777148.9 455.05 1732.5
1315 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1316 RE DISCCART 457903.8 3777148.9 455.08 1732.5
1317 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1318 RE DISCCART 457913.8 3777148.9 455.13 1732.5 349
1319 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1320 RE DISCCART 457923.8 3777148.9 455.18 1732.5
1321 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1322 RE DISCCART 457933.8 3777148.9 455.24 1732.5
1323 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1324 RE DISCCART 457943.8 3777148.9 455.27 1732.5
1325 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1326 RE DISCCART 457953.8 3777148.9 455.31 1732.5
1327 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1328 RE DISCCART 457963.8 3777148.9 455.38 1732.5
1329 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1330 RE DISCCART 457973.8 3777148.9 455.46 1732.5
1331 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1332 RE DISCCART 457983.8 3777148.9 455.55 1732.5
1333 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1334 RE DISCCART 457993.8 3777148.9 455.58 1732.5
1335 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1336 RE DISCCART 458003.8 3777148.9 455.62 1732.5
1337 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1338 RE DISCCART 458013.8 3777148.9 455.67 1732.5
1339 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1340 RE DISCCART 458023.8 3777148.9 455.72 1732.5
1341 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1342 RE DISCCART 458033.8 3777148.9 455.74 1732.5
1343 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1344 RE DISCCART 458043.8 3777148.9 455.77 1732.5
1345 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1346 RE DISCCART 458053.8 3777148.9 455.78 1732.5
1347 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1348 RE DISCCART 458063.8 3777148.9 455.83 1732.5
1349 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1350 RE DISCCART 458073.8 3777148.9 455.88 1732.5
1351 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1352 RE DISCCART 458083.8 3777148.9 455.96 1732.5
1353 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1354 RE DISCCART 458093.8 3777148.9 456.08 1732.5
1355 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1356 RE DISCCART 458103.8 3777148.9 456.13 1732.5
1357 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1358 RE DISCCART 458113.8 3777148.9 456.18 1732.5
1359 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1360 RE DISCCART 458123.8 3777148.9 456.24 1732.5
1361 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1362 RE DISCCART 458133.8 3777148.9 456.27 1732.5
1363 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1364 RE DISCCART 458143.8 3777148.9 456.28 1732.5
1365 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1366 RE DISCCART 458153.8 3777148.9 456.34 1732.5
1367 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1368 RE DISCCART 457753.8 3777158.9 454.33 1732.5
1369 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1370 RE DISCCART 457763.8 3777158.9 454.45 1732.5
1371 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1372 RE DISCCART 457773.8 3777158.9 454.55 1732.5
1373 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1374 RE DISCCART 457783.8 3777158.9 454.58 1732.5
1375 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1376 RE DISCCART 457793.8 3777158.9 454.63 1732.5
1377 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1378 RE DISCCART 457803.8 3777158.9 454.68 1732.5
1379 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1380 RE DISCCART 457813.8 3777158.9 454.74 1732.5
1381 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1382 RE DISCCART 457823.8 3777158.9 454.77 1732.5
1383 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1384 RE DISCCART 457833.8 3777158.9 454.81 1732.5 350
1385 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1386 RE DISCCART 457843.8 3777158.9 454.88 1732.5
1387 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1388 RE DISCCART 457853.8 3777158.9 454.96 1732.5
1389 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1390 RE DISCCART 457863.8 3777158.9 455.05 1732.5
1391 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1392 RE DISCCART 457873.8 3777158.9 455.08 1732.5
1393 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1394 RE DISCCART 457883.8 3777158.9 455.17 1732.5
1395 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1396 RE DISCCART 457893.8 3777158.9 455.24 1732.5
1397 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1398 RE DISCCART 457903.8 3777158.9 455.28 1732.5
1399 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1400 RE DISCCART 457913.8 3777158.9 455.33 1732.5
1401 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1402 RE DISCCART 457923.8 3777158.9 455.38 1732.5
1403 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1404 RE DISCCART 457933.8 3777158.9 455.46 1732.5
1405 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1406 RE DISCCART 457943.8 3777158.9 455.55 1732.5
1407 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1408 RE DISCCART 457953.8 3777158.9 455.58 1732.5
1409 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1410 RE DISCCART 457963.8 3777158.9 455.67 1732.5
1411 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1412 RE DISCCART 457973.8 3777158.9 455.72 1732.5
1413 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1414 RE DISCCART 457983.8 3777158.9 455.74 1732.5
1415 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1416 RE DISCCART 457993.8 3777158.9 455.77 1732.5
1417 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1418 RE DISCCART 458003.8 3777158.9 455.78 1732.5
1419 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1420 RE DISCCART 458013.8 3777158.9 455.83 1732.5
1421 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1422 RE DISCCART 458023.8 3777158.9 455.88 1732.5
1423 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1424 RE DISCCART 458033.8 3777158.9 455.96 1732.5
1425 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1426 RE DISCCART 458043.8 3777158.9 456.05 1732.5
1427 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1428 RE DISCCART 458053.8 3777158.9 456.09 1732.5
1429 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1430 RE DISCCART 458063.8 3777158.9 456.15 1732.5
1431 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1432 RE DISCCART 458073.8 3777158.9 456.2 1732.5
1433 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1434 RE DISCCART 458083.8 3777158.9 456.27 1732.5
1435 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1436 RE DISCCART 458093.8 3777158.9 456.28 1732.5
1437 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1438 RE DISCCART 458103.8 3777158.9 456.33 1732.5
1439 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1440 RE DISCCART 458113.8 3777158.9 456.38 1732.5
1441 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1442 RE DISCCART 458123.8 3777158.9 456.46 1732.5
1443 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1444 RE DISCCART 458133.8 3777158.9 456.55 1732.5
1445 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1446 RE DISCCART 457753.8 3777168.9 454.62 1732.5
1447 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1448 RE DISCCART 457763.8 3777168.9 454.67 1732.5
1449 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1450 RE DISCCART 457773.8 3777168.9 454.72 1732.5 351
1451 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1452 RE DISCCART 457783.8 3777168.9 454.74 1732.5
1453 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1454 RE DISCCART 457793.8 3777168.9 454.81 1732.5
1455 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1456 RE DISCCART 457803.8 3777168.9 454.87 1732.5
1457 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1458 RE DISCCART 457813.8 3777168.9 454.95 1732.5
1459 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1460 RE DISCCART 457823.8 3777168.9 455.05 1732.5
1461 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1462 RE DISCCART 457833.8 3777168.9 455.08 1732.5
1463 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1464 RE DISCCART 457843.8 3777168.9 455.17 1732.5
1465 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1466 RE DISCCART 457853.8 3777168.9 455.22 1732.5
1467 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1468 RE DISCCART 457863.8 3777168.9 455.24 1732.5
1469 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1470 RE DISCCART 457873.8 3777168.9 455.28 1732.5
1471 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1472 RE DISCCART 457883.8 3777168.9 455.33 1732.5
1473 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1474 RE DISCCART 457893.8 3777168.9 455.45 1732.5
1475 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1476 RE DISCCART 457903.8 3777168.9 455.58 1732.5
1477 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1478 RE DISCCART 457913.8 3777168.9 455.63 1732.5
1479 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1480 RE DISCCART 457923.8 3777168.9 455.68 1732.5
1481 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1482 RE DISCCART 457933.8 3777168.9 455.74 1732.5
1483 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1484 RE DISCCART 457943.8 3777168.9 455.77 1732.5
1485 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1486 RE DISCCART 457953.8 3777168.9 455.78 1732.5
1487 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1488 RE DISCCART 457963.8 3777168.9 455.83 1732.5
1489 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1490 RE DISCCART 457973.8 3777168.9 455.88 1732.5
1491 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1492 RE DISCCART 457983.8 3777168.9 455.96 1732.5
1493 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1494 RE DISCCART 457993.8 3777168.9 456.05 1732.5
1495 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1496 RE DISCCART 458003.8 3777168.9 456.08 1732.5
1497 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1498 RE DISCCART 458013.8 3777168.9 456.13 1732.5
1499 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1500 RE DISCCART 458023.8 3777168.9 456.18 1732.5
1501 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1502 RE DISCCART 458033.8 3777168.9 456.24 1732.5
1503 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1504 RE DISCCART 458043.8 3777168.9 456.27 1732.5
1505 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1506 RE DISCCART 458053.8 3777168.9 456.31 1732.5
1507 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1508 RE DISCCART 458063.8 3777168.9 456.38 1732.5
1509 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1510 RE DISCCART 458073.8 3777168.9 456.46 1732.5
1511 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1512 RE DISCCART 458083.8 3777168.9 456.55 1732.5
1513 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1514 RE DISCCART 458093.8 3777168.9 456.58 1732.5
1515 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1516 RE DISCCART 457753.8 3777178.9 454.77 1732.5 352
1517 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1518 RE DISCCART 457763.8 3777178.9 454.81 1732.5
1519 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1520 RE DISCCART 457773.8 3777178.9 454.88 1732.5
1521 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1522 RE DISCCART 457783.8 3777178.9 454.96 1732.5
1523 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1524 RE DISCCART 457793.8 3777178.9 455.08 1732.5
1525 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1526 RE DISCCART 457803.8 3777178.9 455.13 1732.5
1527 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1528 RE DISCCART 457813.8 3777178.9 455.18 1732.5
1529 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1530 RE DISCCART 457823.8 3777178.9 455.24 1732.5
1531 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1532 RE DISCCART 457833.8 3777178.9 455.27 1732.5
1533 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1534 RE DISCCART 457843.8 3777178.9 455.31 1732.5
1535 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1536 RE DISCCART 457853.8 3777178.9 455.38 1732.5
1537 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1538 RE DISCCART 457863.8 3777178.9 455.46 1732.5
1539 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1540 RE DISCCART 457873.8 3777178.9 455.58 1732.5
1541 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1542 RE DISCCART 457883.8 3777178.9 455.63 1732.5
1543 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1544 RE DISCCART 457893.8 3777178.9 455.68 1732.5
1545 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1546 RE DISCCART 457903.8 3777178.9 455.74 1732.5
1547 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1548 RE DISCCART 457913.8 3777178.9 455.81 1732.5
1549 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1550 RE DISCCART 457923.8 3777178.9 455.88 1732.5
1551 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1552 RE DISCCART 457933.8 3777178.9 455.96 1732.5
1553 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1554 RE DISCCART 457943.8 3777178.9 456.05 1732.5
1555 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1556 RE DISCCART 457953.8 3777178.9 456.08 1732.5
1557 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1558 RE DISCCART 457963.8 3777178.9 456.13 1732.5
1559 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1560 RE DISCCART 457973.8 3777178.9 456.18 1732.5
1561 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1562 RE DISCCART 457983.8 3777178.9 456.24 1732.5
1563 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1564 RE DISCCART 457993.8 3777178.9 456.27 1732.5
1565 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1566 RE DISCCART 458003.8 3777178.9 456.27 1732.5
1567 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1568 RE DISCCART 458013.8 3777178.9 456.31 1732.5
1569 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1570 RE DISCCART 458023.8 3777178.9 456.38 1732.5
1571 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1572 RE DISCCART 458033.8 3777178.9 456.46 1732.5
1573 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1574 RE DISCCART 458043.8 3777178.9 456.55 1732.5
1575 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1576 RE DISCCART 458053.8 3777178.9 456.58 1732.5
1577 ** RCPDESCR Neighbors
1578 RE FINISHED
1579
1580 ME STARTING
1581 ME SURFFILE "C:\Users\jclar\OneDrive\Clark and Associates\Project 204 - ABJC - Fontana Square Project\FONT_V9_ADJU\FONT_v9.SFC" 353
1582 ** SURFFILE "C:\Users\jclar\OneDrive\Clark and Associates\Project 204 - ABJC - Fontana Square Project\FONT_V9_ADJU\FONT_v9.SFC"
1583 ME PROFFILE "C:\Users\jclar\OneDrive\Clark and Associates\Project 204 - ABJC - Fontana Square Project\FONT_V9_ADJU\FONT_v9.PFL"
1584 ** PROFFILE "C:\Users\jclar\OneDrive\Clark and Associates\Project 204 - ABJC - Fontana Square Project\FONT_V9_ADJU\FONT_v9.PFL"
1585 ME SURFDATA 3102 2011
1586 ME UAIRDATA 3190 2011
1587 ME SITEDATA 00099999 2011
1588 ME PROFBASE 367 METERS
1589 ME FINISHED
1590
1591 OU STARTING
1592 OU FILEFORM FIX
1593 OU PLOTFILE PERIOD ALL ALL`PERIOD.plt 10000
1594 OU FINISHED
1595
1596
1597 *** Message Summary For AERMOD Model Setup ***
1598
1599 --------- Summary of Total Messages --------
1600
1601 A Total of 0 Fatal Error Message(s)
1602 A Total of 3 Warning Message(s)
1603 A Total of 0 Informational Message(s)
1604
1605
1606 ******** FATAL ERROR MESSAGES ********
1607 *** NONE ***
1608
1609
1610 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
1611 ME W186 1589 MEOPEN: THRESH_1MIN 1-min ASOS wind speed threshold used 0.50
1612 ME W187 1589 MEOPEN: ADJ_U* Option for Stable Low Winds used in AERMET
1613 OU W565 1593 PERPLT: Possible Conflict With Dynamically Allocated FUNIT

PLOTFILE
1614
1615 ***********************************
1616 *** SETUP Finishes Successfully ***
1617 ***********************************
1618
1619 FF *** AERMOD - VERSION 22112 *** *** Fontana Square Emisions *** 01/11/23
1620 *** AERMET - VERSION 16216 ***
*** ***
18:41:23
1621
PAGE 1
1622 *** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV NODRYDPLT NOWETDPLT RURAL ADJ_U* 1623
1624 *** MODEL SETUP OPTIONS SUMMARY ***
1625 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1626
1627 ** Model Options Selected:
1628 * Model Uses Regulatory DEFAULT Options
1629 * Model Is Setup For Calculation of Average CONCentration Values. 1630 * NO GAS DEPOSITION Data Provided.
1631 * NO PARTICLE DEPOSITION Data Provided.
1632 * Model Uses NO DRY DEPLETION. DDPLETE = F
1633 * Model Uses NO WET DEPLETION. WETDPLT = F
1634 * Stack-tip Downwash.
1635 * Model Accounts for ELEVated Terrain Effects.
1636 * Use Calms Processing Routine. 354
1637 * Use Missing Data Processing Routine.
1638 * No Exponential Decay.
1639 * Model Uses RURAL Dispersion Only.
1640 * ADJ_U* - Use ADJ_U* option for SBL in AERMET
1641 * TEMP_Sub - Meteorological data includes TEMP substitutions 1642 * Model Assumes No FLAGPOLE Receptor Heights.
1643 * The User Specified a Pollutant Type of: EXHAUST
1644
1645 **Model Calculates PERIOD Averages Only
1646
1647 **This Run Includes: 2 Source(s); 1 Source Group(s); and 775 Receptor(s) 1648
1649 with: 0 POINT(s), including
1650 0 POINTCAP(s) and 0 POINTHOR(s)
1651 and: 0 VOLUME source(s)
1652 and: 2 AREA type source(s)
1653 and: 0 LINE source(s)
1654 and: 0 RLINE/RLINEXT source(s)
1655 and: 0 OPENPIT source(s)
1656 and: 0 BUOYANT LINE source(s) with a total of 0 line(s) 1657 and: 0 SWPOINT source(s)
1658
1659
1660 **Model Set To Continue RUNning After the Setup Testing. 1661
1662 **The AERMET Input Meteorological Data Version Date: 16216 1663
1664 **Output Options Selected:
1665 Model Outputs Tables of PERIOD Averages by Receptor 1666 Model Outputs External File(s) of High Values for Plotting (PLOTFILE Keyword) 1667
1668 **NOTE: The Following Flags May Appear Following CONC Values: c for Calm Hours 1669 m for Missing Hours
1670 b for Both Calm and
Missing Hours
1671
1672 **Misc. Inputs: Base Elev. for Pot. Temp. Profile (m MSL) = 367.00 ; Decay Coef. = 0.000 ; Rot. Angle = 0.0
1673 Emission Units = GRAMS/SEC ; Emission
Rate Unit Factor = 0.10000E+07
1674 Output Units = MICROGRAMS/M**3
1675
1676 **Approximate Storage Requirements of Model = 3.6 MB of RAM. 1677
1678 **Input Runstream File:
aermod.inp
1679 **Output Print File:
aermod.out
1680
1681 FF *** AERMOD - VERSION 22112 *** *** Fontana Square Emisions *** 01/11/23
1682 *** AERMET - VERSION 16216 ***
*** ***
18:41:23
1683
PAGE 2
1684 *** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV NODRYDPLT NOWETDPLT RURAL ADJ_U* 1685
1686
1687 *** AREAPOLY SOURCE DATA ***
1688
1689 NUMBER EMISSION RATE LOCATION OF AREA BASE RELEASE NUMBER INIT. URBAN EMISSION RATE
1690 SOURCE PART. (GRAMS/SEC X Y ELEV. HEIGHT OF VERTS. 355

SZ SOURCE SCALAR VARY
1691 ID CATS. /METER**2) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) BY
1692 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1693
1694 E5FG71XG 0 0.53917E-07 457814.9 3777234.1 456.5 4.00 5

1.86 NO
1695 E5FG71XH 0 0.83797E-07 458037.5 3777233.5 458.0 4.00 7

1.86 NO
1696 FF *** AERMOD - VERSION 22112 *** *** Fontana Square Emisions *** 01/11/23
1697 *** AERMET - VERSION 16216 ***
*** ***
18:41:23
1698
PAGE 3
1699 *** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV NODRYDPLT NOWETDPLT RURAL ADJ_U* 1700
1701
1702 *** SOURCE IDs DEFINING SOURCE GROUPS ***
1703
1704 SRCGROUP ID SOURCE IDs
1705 ----------- ----------
1706
1707
1708 ALL E5FG71XG , E5FG71XH ,
1709 FF *** AERMOD - VERSION 22112 *** *** Fontana Square Emisions *** 01/11/23
1710 *** AERMET - VERSION 16216 ***
*** ***
18:41:23
1711
PAGE 4
1712 *** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV NODRYDPLT NOWETDPLT RURAL ADJ_U* 1713
1714 *** DISCRETE CARTESIAN RECEPTORS ***
1715 (X-COORD, Y-COORD, ZELEV, ZHILL, ZFLAG)
1716 (METERS)
1717
1718 ( 457753.8, 3776998.9, 450.8, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457763.8, 3776998.9, 450.9, 1732.5, 0.0);
1719 ( 457773.8, 3776998.9, 451.1, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457783.8, 3776998.9, 451.1, 1732.5, 0.0);
1720 ( 457793.8, 3776998.9, 451.1, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457803.8, 3776998.9, 451.2, 1732.5, 0.0);
1721 ( 457813.8, 3776998.9, 451.2, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457823.8, 3776998.9, 451.3, 1732.5, 0.0);
1722 ( 457833.8, 3776998.9, 451.4, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457843.8, 3776998.9, 451.4, 1732.5, 0.0);
1723 ( 457853.8, 3776998.9, 451.6, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457863.8, 3776998.9, 451.6, 1732.5, 0.0);
1724 ( 457873.8, 3776998.9, 451.6, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457883.8, 3776998.9, 451.6, 1732.5, 0.0);
1725 ( 457893.8, 3776998.9, 451.6, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457903.8, 3776998.9, 451.6, 1732.5, 0.0);
1726 ( 457913.8, 3776998.9, 451.6, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457923.8, 3776998.9, 451.6, 1732.5, 0.0);
1727 ( 457933.8, 3776998.9, 451.6, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457943.8, 3776998.9, 451.7, 1732.5, 0.0);
1728 ( 457953.8, 3776998.9, 451.7, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457963.8, 3776998.9, 451.7, 1732.5, 0.0);
1729 ( 457973.8, 3776998.9, 451.7, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457983.8, 3776998.9, 451.8, 1732.5, 0.0);
1730 ( 457993.8, 3776998.9, 451.8, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458003.8, 3776998.9, 451.8, 1732.5, 0.0); 356
1731 ( 458013.8, 3776998.9, 451.8, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458023.8, 3776998.9, 451.8, 1732.5, 0.0);
1732 ( 458033.8, 3776998.9, 451.9, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458043.8, 3776998.9, 452.0, 1732.5, 0.0);
1733 ( 458053.8, 3776998.9, 452.1, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458063.8, 3776998.9, 452.1, 1732.5, 0.0);
1734 ( 458073.8, 3776998.9, 452.1, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458083.8, 3776998.9, 452.2, 1732.5, 0.0);
1735 ( 458093.8, 3776998.9, 452.3, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458103.8, 3776998.9, 452.3, 1732.5, 0.0);
1736 ( 458113.8, 3776998.9, 452.4, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458123.8, 3776998.9, 452.6, 1732.5, 0.0);
1737 ( 458133.8, 3776998.9, 452.6, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458143.8, 3776998.9, 452.7, 1732.5, 0.0);
1738 ( 458153.8, 3776998.9, 452.8, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458163.8, 3776998.9, 452.8, 1732.5, 0.0);
1739 ( 457753.8, 3777008.9, 451.1, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457763.8, 3777008.9, 451.2, 1732.5, 0.0);
1740 ( 457773.8, 3777008.9, 451.2, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457783.8, 3777008.9, 451.2, 1732.5, 0.0);
1741 ( 457793.8, 3777008.9, 451.3, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457803.8, 3777008.9, 451.3, 1732.5, 0.0);
1742 ( 457813.8, 3777008.9, 451.4, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457823.8, 3777008.9, 451.6, 1732.5, 0.0);
1743 ( 457833.8, 3777008.9, 451.6, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457843.8, 3777008.9, 451.7, 1732.5, 0.0);
1744 ( 457853.8, 3777008.9, 451.7, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457863.8, 3777008.9, 451.7, 1732.5, 0.0);
1745 ( 457873.8, 3777008.9, 451.8, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457883.8, 3777008.9, 451.8, 1732.5, 0.0);
1746 ( 457893.8, 3777008.9, 451.8, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457903.8, 3777008.9, 451.8, 1732.5, 0.0);
1747 ( 457913.8, 3777008.9, 451.8, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457923.8, 3777008.9, 451.8, 1732.5, 0.0);
1748 ( 457933.8, 3777008.9, 451.8, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457943.8, 3777008.9, 451.9, 1732.5, 0.0);
1749 ( 457953.8, 3777008.9, 451.9, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457963.8, 3777008.9, 451.9, 1732.5, 0.0);
1750 ( 457973.8, 3777008.9, 452.0, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457983.8, 3777008.9, 452.1, 1732.5, 0.0);
1751 ( 457993.8, 3777008.9, 452.1, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458003.8, 3777008.9, 452.1, 1732.5, 0.0);
1752 ( 458013.8, 3777008.9, 452.1, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458023.8, 3777008.9, 452.1, 1732.5, 0.0);
1753 ( 458033.8, 3777008.9, 452.2, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458043.8, 3777008.9, 452.2, 1732.5, 0.0);
1754 ( 458053.8, 3777008.9, 452.3, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458063.8, 3777008.9, 452.3, 1732.5, 0.0);
1755 ( 458073.8, 3777008.9, 452.3, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458083.8, 3777008.9, 452.5, 1732.5, 0.0);
1756 ( 458093.8, 3777008.9, 452.6, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458103.8, 3777008.9, 452.6, 1732.5, 0.0);
1757 ( 458113.8, 3777008.9, 452.7, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458123.8, 3777008.9, 452.8, 1732.5, 0.0);
1758 ( 458133.8, 3777008.9, 452.8, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458143.8, 3777008.9, 452.9, 1732.5, 0.0);
1759 ( 458153.8, 3777008.9, 453.1, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458163.8, 3777008.9, 453.1, 1732.5, 0.0);
1760 ( 457753.8, 3777018.9, 451.3, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457763.8, 3777018.9, 451.3, 1732.5, 0.0);
1761 ( 457773.8, 3777018.9, 451.4, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457783.8, 3777018.9, 451.5, 1732.5, 0.0);
1762 ( 457793.8, 3777018.9, 451.6, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457803.8, 3777018.9, 451.6, 1732.5, 0.0);
1763 FF *** AERMOD - VERSION 22112 *** *** Fontana Square Emisions *** 01/11/23 357
1764 *** AERMET - VERSION 16216 ***
*** ***
18:41:23
1765
PAGE 5
1766 *** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV NODRYDPLT NOWETDPLT RURAL ADJ_U* 1767
1768 *** DISCRETE CARTESIAN RECEPTORS ***
1769 (X-COORD, Y-COORD, ZELEV, ZHILL, ZFLAG)
1770 (METERS)
1771
1772 ( 457813.8, 3777018.9, 451.7, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457823.8, 3777018.9, 451.7, 1732.5, 0.0);
1773 ( 457833.8, 3777018.9, 451.8, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457843.8, 3777018.9, 451.8, 1732.5, 0.0);
1774 ( 457853.8, 3777018.9, 451.9, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457863.8, 3777018.9, 451.9, 1732.5, 0.0);
1775 ( 457873.8, 3777018.9, 452.1, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457883.8, 3777018.9, 452.1, 1732.5, 0.0);
1776 ( 457893.8, 3777018.9, 452.1, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457903.8, 3777018.9, 452.1, 1732.5, 0.0);
1777 ( 457913.8, 3777018.9, 452.1, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457923.8, 3777018.9, 452.1, 1732.5, 0.0);
1778 ( 457933.8, 3777018.9, 452.1, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457943.8, 3777018.9, 452.2, 1732.5, 0.0);
1779 ( 457953.8, 3777018.9, 452.2, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457963.8, 3777018.9, 452.2, 1732.5, 0.0);
1780 ( 457973.8, 3777018.9, 452.2, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457983.8, 3777018.9, 452.3, 1732.5, 0.0);
1781 ( 457993.8, 3777018.9, 452.3, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458003.8, 3777018.9, 452.3, 1732.5, 0.0);
1782 ( 458013.8, 3777018.9, 452.3, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458023.8, 3777018.9, 452.3, 1732.5, 0.0);
1783 ( 458033.8, 3777018.9, 452.4, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458043.8, 3777018.9, 452.5, 1732.5, 0.0);
1784 ( 458053.8, 3777018.9, 452.6, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458063.8, 3777018.9, 452.6, 1732.5, 0.0);
1785 ( 458073.8, 3777018.9, 452.7, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458083.8, 3777018.9, 452.7, 1732.5, 0.0);
1786 ( 458093.8, 3777018.9, 452.8, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458103.8, 3777018.9, 452.8, 1732.5, 0.0);
1787 ( 458113.8, 3777018.9, 452.9, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458123.8, 3777018.9, 453.1, 1732.5, 0.0);
1788 ( 458133.8, 3777018.9, 453.1, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458143.8, 3777018.9, 453.2, 1732.5, 0.0);
1789 ( 458153.8, 3777018.9, 453.2, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458163.8, 3777018.9, 453.3, 1732.5, 0.0);
1790 ( 457753.8, 3777028.9, 451.6, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457763.8, 3777028.9, 451.6, 1732.5, 0.0);
1791 ( 457773.8, 3777028.9, 451.7, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457783.8, 3777028.9, 451.7, 1732.5, 0.0);
1792 ( 457793.8, 3777028.9, 451.8, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457803.8, 3777028.9, 451.8, 1732.5, 0.0);
1793 ( 457813.8, 3777028.9, 451.9, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457823.8, 3777028.9, 451.9, 1732.5, 0.0);
1794 ( 457833.8, 3777028.9, 452.1, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457843.8, 3777028.9, 452.1, 1732.5, 0.0);
1795 ( 457853.8, 3777028.9, 452.1, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457863.8, 3777028.9, 452.2, 1732.5, 0.0);
1796 ( 457873.8, 3777028.9, 452.2, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457883.8, 3777028.9, 452.2, 1732.5, 0.0);
1797 ( 457893.8, 3777028.9, 452.3, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457903.8, 3777028.9, 452.3, 1732.5, 0.0);
1798 ( 457913.8, 3777028.9, 452.3, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457923.8, 3777028.9, 452.3, 1732.5, 0.0);
1799 ( 457933.8, 3777028.9, 452.3, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457943.8, 358 3777028.9, 452.4, 1732.5, 0.0);
1800 ( 457953.8, 3777028.9, 452.4, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457963.8, 3777028.9, 452.4, 1732.5, 0.0);
1801 ( 457973.8, 3777028.9, 452.5, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457983.8, 3777028.9, 452.6, 1732.5, 0.0);
1802 ( 457993.8, 3777028.9, 452.6, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458003.8, 3777028.9, 452.6, 1732.5, 0.0);
1803 ( 458013.8, 3777028.9, 452.6, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458023.8, 3777028.9, 452.6, 1732.5, 0.0);
1804 ( 458033.8, 3777028.9, 452.7, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458043.8, 3777028.9, 452.7, 1732.5, 0.0);
1805 ( 458053.8, 3777028.9, 452.8, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458063.8, 3777028.9, 452.8, 1732.5, 0.0);
1806 ( 458073.8, 3777028.9, 452.9, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458083.8, 3777028.9, 453.0, 1732.5, 0.0);
1807 ( 458093.8, 3777028.9, 453.1, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458103.8, 3777028.9, 453.1, 1732.5, 0.0);
1808 ( 458113.8, 3777028.9, 453.2, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458123.8, 3777028.9, 453.3, 1732.5, 0.0);
1809 ( 458133.8, 3777028.9, 453.3, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458143.8, 3777028.9, 453.4, 1732.5, 0.0);
1810 ( 458153.8, 3777028.9, 453.5, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458163.8, 3777028.9, 453.6, 1732.5, 0.0);
1811 ( 457753.8, 3777038.9, 451.7, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457763.8, 3777038.9, 451.8, 1732.5, 0.0);
1812 ( 457773.8, 3777038.9, 451.8, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457783.8, 3777038.9, 451.9, 1732.5, 0.0);
1813 ( 457793.8, 3777038.9, 452.1, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457803.8, 3777038.9, 452.1, 1732.5, 0.0);
1814 ( 457813.8, 3777038.9, 452.1, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457823.8, 3777038.9, 452.2, 1732.5, 0.0);
1815 ( 457833.8, 3777038.9, 452.2, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457843.8, 3777038.9, 452.3, 1732.5, 0.0);
1816 ( 457853.8, 3777038.9, 452.3, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457863.8, 3777038.9, 452.4, 1732.5, 0.0);
1817 FF *** AERMOD - VERSION 22112 *** *** Fontana Square Emisions *** 01/11/23
1818 *** AERMET - VERSION 16216 ***
*** ***
18:41:23
1819
PAGE 6
1820 *** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV NODRYDPLT NOWETDPLT RURAL ADJ_U* 1821
1822 *** DISCRETE CARTESIAN RECEPTORS ***
1823 (X-COORD, Y-COORD, ZELEV, ZHILL, ZFLAG)
1824 (METERS)
1825
1826 ( 457873.8, 3777038.9, 452.4, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457883.8, 3777038.9, 452.5, 1732.5, 0.0);
1827 ( 457893.8, 3777038.9, 452.6, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457903.8, 3777038.9, 452.6, 1732.5, 0.0);
1828 ( 457913.8, 3777038.9, 452.6, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457923.8, 3777038.9, 452.6, 1732.5, 0.0);
1829 ( 457933.8, 3777038.9, 452.6, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457943.8, 3777038.9, 452.6, 1732.5, 0.0);
1830 ( 457953.8, 3777038.9, 452.7, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457963.8, 3777038.9, 452.7, 1732.5, 0.0);
1831 ( 457973.8, 3777038.9, 452.7, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457983.8, 3777038.9, 452.8, 1732.5, 0.0);
1832 ( 457993.8, 3777038.9, 452.8, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458003.8, 3777038.9, 452.8, 1732.5, 0.0);
1833 ( 458013.8, 3777038.9, 452.8, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458023.8, 3777038.9, 452.8, 1732.5, 0.0);
1834 ( 458033.8, 3777038.9, 452.9, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458043.8, 3777038.9, 453.0, 1732.5, 0.0); 359
1835 ( 458053.8, 3777038.9, 453.1, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458063.8, 3777038.9, 453.1, 1732.5, 0.0);
1836 ( 458073.8, 3777038.9, 453.2, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458083.8, 3777038.9, 453.3, 1732.5, 0.0);
1837 ( 458093.8, 3777038.9, 453.3, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458103.8, 3777038.9, 453.3, 1732.5, 0.0);
1838 ( 458113.8, 3777038.9, 453.4, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458123.8, 3777038.9, 453.6, 1732.5, 0.0);
1839 ( 458133.8, 3777038.9, 453.6, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458143.8, 3777038.9, 453.7, 1732.5, 0.0);
1840 ( 458153.8, 3777038.9, 453.7, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458163.8, 3777038.9, 453.8, 1732.5, 0.0);
1841 ( 457753.8, 3777048.9, 451.9, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457763.8, 3777048.9, 452.1, 1732.5, 0.0);
1842 ( 457773.8, 3777048.9, 452.1, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457783.8, 3777048.9, 452.2, 1732.5, 0.0);
1843 ( 457793.8, 3777048.9, 452.2, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457803.8, 3777048.9, 452.3, 1732.5, 0.0);
1844 ( 457813.8, 3777048.9, 452.3, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457823.8, 3777048.9, 452.4, 1732.5, 0.0);
1845 ( 457833.8, 3777048.9, 452.4, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457843.8, 3777048.9, 452.6, 1732.5, 0.0);
1846 ( 457853.8, 3777048.9, 452.6, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457863.8, 3777048.9, 452.6, 1732.5, 0.0);
1847 ( 457873.8, 3777048.9, 452.7, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457883.8, 3777048.9, 452.7, 1732.5, 0.0);
1848 ( 457893.8, 3777048.9, 452.7, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457903.8, 3777048.9, 452.8, 1732.5, 0.0);
1849 ( 457913.8, 3777048.9, 452.8, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457923.8, 3777048.9, 452.8, 1732.5, 0.0);
1850 ( 457933.8, 3777048.9, 452.8, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457943.8, 3777048.9, 452.8, 1732.5, 0.0);
1851 ( 457953.8, 3777048.9, 452.9, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457963.8, 3777048.9, 452.9, 1732.5, 0.0);
1852 ( 457973.8, 3777048.9, 453.0, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457983.8, 3777048.9, 453.1, 1732.5, 0.0);
1853 ( 457993.8, 3777048.9, 453.1, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458003.8, 3777048.9, 453.1, 1732.5, 0.0);
1854 ( 458013.8, 3777048.9, 453.1, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458023.8, 3777048.9, 453.2, 1732.5, 0.0);
1855 ( 458033.8, 3777048.9, 453.2, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458043.8, 3777048.9, 453.3, 1732.5, 0.0);
1856 ( 458053.8, 3777048.9, 453.3, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458063.8, 3777048.9, 453.3, 1732.5, 0.0);
1857 ( 458073.8, 3777048.9, 453.4, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458083.8, 3777048.9, 453.6, 1732.5, 0.0);
1858 ( 458093.8, 3777048.9, 453.6, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458103.8, 3777048.9, 453.6, 1732.5, 0.0);
1859 ( 458113.8, 3777048.9, 453.7, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458123.8, 3777048.9, 453.8, 1732.5, 0.0);
1860 ( 458133.8, 3777048.9, 453.8, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458143.8, 3777048.9, 453.9, 1732.5, 0.0);
1861 ( 458153.8, 3777048.9, 454.0, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458163.8, 3777048.9, 454.1, 1732.5, 0.0);
1862 ( 457753.8, 3777058.9, 452.2, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457763.8, 3777058.9, 452.2, 1732.5, 0.0);
1863 ( 457773.8, 3777058.9, 452.3, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457783.8, 3777058.9, 452.3, 1732.5, 0.0);
1864 ( 457793.8, 3777058.9, 452.4, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457803.8, 3777058.9, 452.6, 1732.5, 0.0);
1865 ( 457813.8, 3777058.9, 452.6, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457823.8, 3777058.9, 452.6, 1732.5, 0.0);
1866 ( 457833.8, 3777058.9, 452.7, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457843.8, 3777058.9, 452.7, 1732.5, 0.0);
1867 ( 457853.8, 3777058.9, 452.8, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457863.8, 3777058.9, 452.8, 1732.5, 0.0); 360
1868 ( 457873.8, 3777058.9, 452.8, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457883.8, 3777058.9, 452.9, 1732.5, 0.0);
1869 ( 457893.8, 3777058.9, 452.9, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457903.8, 3777058.9, 453.1, 1732.5, 0.0);
1870 ( 457913.8, 3777058.9, 453.1, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457923.8, 3777058.9, 453.1, 1732.5, 0.0);
1871 FF *** AERMOD - VERSION 22112 *** *** Fontana Square Emisions *** 01/11/23
1872 *** AERMET - VERSION 16216 ***
*** ***
18:41:23
1873
PAGE 7
1874 *** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV NODRYDPLT NOWETDPLT RURAL ADJ_U* 1875
1876 *** DISCRETE CARTESIAN RECEPTORS ***
1877 (X-COORD, Y-COORD, ZELEV, ZHILL, ZFLAG)
1878 (METERS)
1879
1880 ( 457933.8, 3777058.9, 453.1, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457943.8, 3777058.9, 453.1, 1732.5, 0.0);
1881 ( 457953.8, 3777058.9, 453.2, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457963.8, 3777058.9, 453.2, 1732.5, 0.0);
1882 ( 457973.8, 3777058.9, 453.2, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457983.8, 3777058.9, 453.3, 1732.5, 0.0);
1883 ( 457993.8, 3777058.9, 453.3, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458003.8, 3777058.9, 453.3, 1732.5, 0.0);
1884 ( 458013.8, 3777058.9, 453.3, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458023.8, 3777058.9, 453.4, 1732.5, 0.0);
1885 ( 458033.8, 3777058.9, 453.5, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458043.8, 3777058.9, 453.6, 1732.5, 0.0);
1886 ( 458053.8, 3777058.9, 453.6, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458063.8, 3777058.9, 453.6, 1732.5, 0.0);
1887 ( 458073.8, 3777058.9, 453.7, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458083.8, 3777058.9, 453.8, 1732.5, 0.0);
1888 ( 458093.8, 3777058.9, 453.8, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458103.8, 3777058.9, 453.8, 1732.5, 0.0);
1889 ( 458113.8, 3777058.9, 453.9, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458123.8, 3777058.9, 454.1, 1732.5, 0.0);
1890 ( 458133.8, 3777058.9, 454.1, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458143.8, 3777058.9, 454.2, 1732.5, 0.0);
1891 ( 458153.8, 3777058.9, 454.2, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458163.8, 3777058.9, 454.3, 1732.5, 0.0);
1892 ( 457753.8, 3777068.9, 452.3, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457763.8, 3777068.9, 452.4, 1732.5, 0.0);
1893 ( 457773.8, 3777068.9, 452.6, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457783.8, 3777068.9, 452.6, 1732.5, 0.0);
1894 ( 457793.8, 3777068.9, 452.7, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457803.8, 3777068.9, 452.7, 1732.5, 0.0);
1895 ( 457813.8, 3777068.9, 452.8, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457823.8, 3777068.9, 452.8, 1732.5, 0.0);
1896 ( 457833.8, 3777068.9, 452.9, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457843.8, 3777068.9, 452.9, 1732.5, 0.0);
1897 ( 457853.8, 3777068.9, 453.1, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457863.8, 3777068.9, 453.1, 1732.5, 0.0);
1898 ( 457873.8, 3777068.9, 453.1, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457883.8, 3777068.9, 453.1, 1732.5, 0.0);
1899 ( 457893.8, 3777068.9, 453.2, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457903.8, 3777068.9, 453.2, 1732.5, 0.0);
1900 ( 457913.8, 3777068.9, 453.3, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457923.8, 3777068.9, 453.3, 1732.5, 0.0);
1901 ( 457933.8, 3777068.9, 453.3, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457943.8, 3777068.9, 453.3, 1732.5, 0.0);
1902 ( 457953.8, 3777068.9, 453.4, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457963.8, 3777068.9, 453.4, 1732.5, 0.0);
1903 ( 457973.8, 3777068.9, 453.5, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457983.8, 361 3777068.9, 453.6, 1732.5, 0.0);
1904 ( 457993.8, 3777068.9, 453.6, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458003.8, 3777068.9, 453.6, 1732.5, 0.0);
1905 ( 458013.8, 3777068.9, 453.6, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458023.8, 3777068.9, 453.7, 1732.5, 0.0);
1906 ( 458033.8, 3777068.9, 453.7, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458043.8, 3777068.9, 453.8, 1732.5, 0.0);
1907 ( 458053.8, 3777068.9, 453.8, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458063.8, 3777068.9, 453.8, 1732.5, 0.0);
1908 ( 458073.8, 3777068.9, 454.0, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458083.8, 3777068.9, 454.1, 1732.5, 0.0);
1909 ( 458093.8, 3777068.9, 454.1, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458103.8, 3777068.9, 454.1, 1732.5, 0.0);
1910 ( 458113.8, 3777068.9, 454.2, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458123.8, 3777068.9, 454.3, 1732.5, 0.0);
1911 ( 458133.8, 3777068.9, 454.3, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458143.8, 3777068.9, 454.3, 1732.5, 0.0);
1912 ( 458153.8, 3777068.9, 454.4, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458163.8, 3777068.9, 454.6, 1732.5, 0.0);
1913 ( 457753.8, 3777078.9, 452.6, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457763.8, 3777078.9, 452.7, 1732.5, 0.0);
1914 ( 457773.8, 3777078.9, 452.7, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457783.8, 3777078.9, 452.8, 1732.5, 0.0);
1915 ( 457793.8, 3777078.9, 452.8, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457803.8, 3777078.9, 452.9, 1732.5, 0.0);
1916 ( 457813.8, 3777078.9, 453.1, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457823.8, 3777078.9, 453.1, 1732.5, 0.0);
1917 ( 457833.8, 3777078.9, 453.1, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457843.8, 3777078.9, 453.2, 1732.5, 0.0);
1918 ( 457853.8, 3777078.9, 453.2, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457863.8, 3777078.9, 453.3, 1732.5, 0.0);
1919 ( 457873.8, 3777078.9, 453.3, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457883.8, 3777078.9, 453.3, 1732.5, 0.0);
1920 ( 457893.8, 3777078.9, 453.4, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457903.8, 3777078.9, 453.4, 1732.5, 0.0);
1921 ( 457913.8, 3777078.9, 453.6, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457923.8, 3777078.9, 453.6, 1732.5, 0.0);
1922 ( 457933.8, 3777078.9, 453.6, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457943.8, 3777078.9, 453.6, 1732.5, 0.0);
1923 ( 457953.8, 3777078.9, 453.7, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457963.8, 3777078.9, 453.7, 1732.5, 0.0);
1924 ( 457973.8, 3777078.9, 453.7, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457983.8, 3777078.9, 453.8, 1732.5, 0.0);
1925 FF *** AERMOD - VERSION 22112 *** *** Fontana Square Emisions *** 01/11/23
1926 *** AERMET - VERSION 16216 ***
*** ***
18:41:23
1927
PAGE 8
1928 *** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV NODRYDPLT NOWETDPLT RURAL ADJ_U* 1929
1930 *** DISCRETE CARTESIAN RECEPTORS ***
1931 (X-COORD, Y-COORD, ZELEV, ZHILL, ZFLAG)
1932 (METERS)
1933
1934 ( 457993.8, 3777078.9, 453.8, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458003.8, 3777078.9, 453.8, 1732.5, 0.0);
1935 ( 458013.8, 3777078.9, 453.8, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458023.8, 3777078.9, 453.9, 1732.5, 0.0);
1936 ( 458033.8, 3777078.9, 454.0, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458043.8, 3777078.9, 454.1, 1732.5, 0.0);
1937 ( 458053.8, 3777078.9, 454.1, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458063.8, 3777078.9, 454.2, 1732.5, 0.0);
1938 ( 458073.8, 3777078.9, 454.2, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458083.8, 3777078.9, 454.3, 1732.5, 0.0); 362
1939 ( 458093.8, 3777078.9, 454.3, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458103.8, 3777078.9, 454.3, 1732.5, 0.0);
1940 ( 458113.8, 3777078.9, 454.5, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458123.8, 3777078.9, 454.6, 1732.5, 0.0);
1941 ( 458133.8, 3777078.9, 454.6, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458143.8, 3777078.9, 454.6, 1732.5, 0.0);
1942 ( 458153.8, 3777078.9, 454.7, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458163.8, 3777078.9, 454.7, 1732.5, 0.0);
1943 ( 457753.8, 3777088.9, 452.8, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457763.8, 3777088.9, 452.9, 1732.5, 0.0);
1944 ( 457773.8, 3777088.9, 453.0, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457783.8, 3777088.9, 453.1, 1732.5, 0.0);
1945 ( 457793.8, 3777088.9, 453.1, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457803.8, 3777088.9, 453.2, 1732.5, 0.0);
1946 ( 457813.8, 3777088.9, 453.2, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457823.8, 3777088.9, 453.3, 1732.5, 0.0);
1947 ( 457833.8, 3777088.9, 453.3, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457843.8, 3777088.9, 453.3, 1732.5, 0.0);
1948 ( 457853.8, 3777088.9, 453.4, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457863.8, 3777088.9, 453.6, 1732.5, 0.0);
1949 ( 457873.8, 3777088.9, 453.6, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457883.8, 3777088.9, 453.6, 1732.5, 0.0);
1950 ( 457893.8, 3777088.9, 453.6, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457903.8, 3777088.9, 453.7, 1732.5, 0.0);
1951 ( 457913.8, 3777088.9, 453.7, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457923.8, 3777088.9, 453.8, 1732.5, 0.0);
1952 ( 457933.8, 3777088.9, 453.8, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457943.8, 3777088.9, 453.8, 1732.5, 0.0);
1953 ( 457953.8, 3777088.9, 453.9, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457963.8, 3777088.9, 453.9, 1732.5, 0.0);
1954 ( 457973.8, 3777088.9, 454.0, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457983.8, 3777088.9, 454.1, 1732.5, 0.0);
1955 ( 457993.8, 3777088.9, 454.1, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458003.8, 3777088.9, 454.1, 1732.5, 0.0);
1956 ( 458013.8, 3777088.9, 454.2, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458023.8, 3777088.9, 454.2, 1732.5, 0.0);
1957 ( 458033.8, 3777088.9, 454.3, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458043.8, 3777088.9, 454.3, 1732.5, 0.0);
1958 ( 458053.8, 3777088.9, 454.3, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458063.8, 3777088.9, 454.4, 1732.5, 0.0);
1959 ( 458073.8, 3777088.9, 454.5, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458083.8, 3777088.9, 454.6, 1732.5, 0.0);
1960 ( 458093.8, 3777088.9, 454.6, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458103.8, 3777088.9, 454.7, 1732.5, 0.0);
1961 ( 458113.8, 3777088.9, 454.7, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458123.8, 3777088.9, 454.8, 1732.5, 0.0);
1962 ( 458133.8, 3777088.9, 454.8, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458143.8, 3777088.9, 454.8, 1732.5, 0.0);
1963 ( 458153.8, 3777088.9, 454.9, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458163.8, 3777088.9, 455.0, 1732.5, 0.0);
1964 ( 457753.8, 3777098.9, 453.1, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457763.8, 3777098.9, 453.2, 1732.5, 0.0);
1965 ( 457773.8, 3777098.9, 453.2, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457783.8, 3777098.9, 453.3, 1732.5, 0.0);
1966 ( 457793.8, 3777098.9, 453.3, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457803.8, 3777098.9, 453.3, 1732.5, 0.0);
1967 ( 457813.8, 3777098.9, 453.4, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457823.8, 3777098.9, 453.6, 1732.5, 0.0);
1968 ( 457833.8, 3777098.9, 453.6, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457843.8, 3777098.9, 453.6, 1732.5, 0.0);
1969 ( 457853.8, 3777098.9, 453.7, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457863.8, 3777098.9, 453.7, 1732.5, 0.0);
1970 ( 457873.8, 3777098.9, 453.7, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457883.8, 3777098.9, 453.8, 1732.5, 0.0);
1971 ( 457893.8, 3777098.9, 453.8, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457903.8, 3777098.9, 453.9, 1732.5, 0.0); 363
1972 ( 457913.8, 3777098.9, 453.9, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457923.8, 3777098.9, 454.1, 1732.5, 0.0);
1973 ( 457933.8, 3777098.9, 454.1, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457943.8, 3777098.9, 454.1, 1732.5, 0.0);
1974 ( 457953.8, 3777098.9, 454.2, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457963.8, 3777098.9, 454.2, 1732.5, 0.0);
1975 ( 457973.8, 3777098.9, 454.3, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457983.8, 3777098.9, 454.3, 1732.5, 0.0);
1976 ( 457993.8, 3777098.9, 454.3, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458003.8, 3777098.9, 454.3, 1732.5, 0.0);
1977 ( 458013.8, 3777098.9, 454.4, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458023.8, 3777098.9, 454.5, 1732.5, 0.0);
1978 ( 458033.8, 3777098.9, 454.6, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458043.8, 3777098.9, 454.6, 1732.5, 0.0);
1979 FF *** AERMOD - VERSION 22112 *** *** Fontana Square Emisions *** 01/11/23
1980 *** AERMET - VERSION 16216 ***
*** ***
18:41:23
1981
PAGE 9
1982 *** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV NODRYDPLT NOWETDPLT RURAL ADJ_U* 1983
1984 *** DISCRETE CARTESIAN RECEPTORS ***
1985 (X-COORD, Y-COORD, ZELEV, ZHILL, ZFLAG)
1986 (METERS)
1987
1988 ( 458053.8, 3777098.9, 454.6, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458063.8, 3777098.9, 454.7, 1732.5, 0.0);
1989 ( 458073.8, 3777098.9, 454.7, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458083.8, 3777098.9, 454.8, 1732.5, 0.0);
1990 ( 458093.8, 3777098.9, 454.8, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458103.8, 3777098.9, 454.8, 1732.5, 0.0);
1991 ( 458113.8, 3777098.9, 454.9, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458123.8, 3777098.9, 455.1, 1732.5, 0.0);
1992 ( 458133.8, 3777098.9, 455.1, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458143.8, 3777098.9, 455.1, 1732.5, 0.0);
1993 ( 458153.8, 3777098.9, 455.2, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458163.8, 3777098.9, 455.2, 1732.5, 0.0);
1994 ( 457753.8, 3777108.9, 453.3, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457763.8, 3777108.9, 453.3, 1732.5, 0.0);
1995 ( 457773.8, 3777108.9, 453.4, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457783.8, 3777108.9, 453.6, 1732.5, 0.0);
1996 ( 457793.8, 3777108.9, 453.6, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457803.8, 3777108.9, 453.6, 1732.5, 0.0);
1997 ( 457813.8, 3777108.9, 453.7, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457823.8, 3777108.9, 453.7, 1732.5, 0.0);
1998 ( 457833.8, 3777108.9, 453.8, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457843.8, 3777108.9, 453.8, 1732.5, 0.0);
1999 ( 457853.8, 3777108.9, 453.8, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457863.8, 3777108.9, 453.9, 1732.5, 0.0);
2000 ( 457873.8, 3777108.9, 454.0, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457883.8, 3777108.9, 454.1, 1732.5, 0.0);
2001 ( 457893.8, 3777108.9, 454.1, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457903.8, 3777108.9, 454.1, 1732.5, 0.0);
2002 ( 457913.8, 3777108.9, 454.2, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457923.8, 3777108.9, 454.2, 1732.5, 0.0);
2003 ( 457933.8, 3777108.9, 454.3, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457943.8, 3777108.9, 454.3, 1732.5, 0.0);
2004 ( 457953.8, 3777108.9, 454.3, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457963.8, 3777108.9, 454.5, 1732.5, 0.0);
2005 ( 457973.8, 3777108.9, 454.6, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457983.8, 3777108.9, 454.6, 1732.5, 0.0);
2006 ( 457993.8, 3777108.9, 454.6, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458003.8, 3777108.9, 454.6, 1732.5, 0.0);
2007 ( 458013.8, 3777108.9, 454.7, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458023.8, 364 3777108.9, 454.7, 1732.5, 0.0);
2008 ( 458033.8, 3777108.9, 454.8, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458043.8, 3777108.9, 454.8, 1732.5, 0.0);
2009 ( 458053.8, 3777108.9, 454.8, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458063.8, 3777108.9, 454.9, 1732.5, 0.0);
2010 ( 458073.8, 3777108.9, 455.0, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458083.8, 3777108.9, 455.1, 1732.5, 0.0);
2011 ( 458093.8, 3777108.9, 455.1, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458103.8, 3777108.9, 455.1, 1732.5, 0.0);
2012 ( 458113.8, 3777108.9, 455.2, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458123.8, 3777108.9, 455.2, 1732.5, 0.0);
2013 ( 458133.8, 3777108.9, 455.3, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458143.8, 3777108.9, 455.3, 1732.5, 0.0);
2014 ( 458153.8, 3777108.9, 455.4, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458163.8, 3777108.9, 455.5, 1732.5, 0.0);
2015 ( 457753.8, 3777118.9, 453.6, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457763.8, 3777118.9, 453.6, 1732.5, 0.0);
2016 ( 457773.8, 3777118.9, 453.7, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457783.8, 3777118.9, 453.7, 1732.5, 0.0);
2017 ( 457793.8, 3777118.9, 453.7, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457803.8, 3777118.9, 453.8, 1732.5, 0.0);
2018 ( 457813.8, 3777118.9, 453.9, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457823.8, 3777118.9, 453.9, 1732.5, 0.0);
2019 ( 457833.8, 3777118.9, 454.1, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457843.8, 3777118.9, 454.1, 1732.5, 0.0);
2020 ( 457853.8, 3777118.9, 454.1, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457863.8, 3777118.9, 454.2, 1732.5, 0.0);
2021 ( 457873.8, 3777118.9, 454.2, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457883.8, 3777118.9, 454.2, 1732.5, 0.0);
2022 ( 457893.8, 3777118.9, 454.3, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457903.8, 3777118.9, 454.3, 1732.5, 0.0);
2023 ( 457913.8, 3777118.9, 454.4, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457923.8, 3777118.9, 454.5, 1732.5, 0.0);
2024 ( 457933.8, 3777118.9, 454.6, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457943.8, 3777118.9, 454.6, 1732.5, 0.0);
2025 ( 457953.8, 3777118.9, 454.7, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457963.8, 3777118.9, 454.7, 1732.5, 0.0);
2026 ( 457973.8, 3777118.9, 454.7, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457983.8, 3777118.9, 454.8, 1732.5, 0.0);
2027 ( 457993.8, 3777118.9, 454.8, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458003.8, 3777118.9, 454.8, 1732.5, 0.0);
2028 ( 458013.8, 3777118.9, 454.9, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458023.8, 3777118.9, 455.0, 1732.5, 0.0);
2029 ( 458033.8, 3777118.9, 455.1, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458043.8, 3777118.9, 455.1, 1732.5, 0.0);
2030 ( 458053.8, 3777118.9, 455.1, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458063.8, 3777118.9, 455.2, 1732.5, 0.0);
2031 ( 458073.8, 3777118.9, 455.2, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458083.8, 3777118.9, 455.3, 1732.5, 0.0);
2032 ( 458093.8, 3777118.9, 455.3, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458103.8, 3777118.9, 455.3, 1732.5, 0.0);
2033 FF *** AERMOD - VERSION 22112 *** *** Fontana Square Emisions *** 01/11/23
2034 *** AERMET - VERSION 16216 ***
*** ***
18:41:23
2035
PAGE 10
2036 *** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV NODRYDPLT NOWETDPLT RURAL ADJ_U* 2037
2038 *** DISCRETE CARTESIAN RECEPTORS ***
2039 (X-COORD, Y-COORD, ZELEV, ZHILL, ZFLAG)
2040 (METERS)
2041
2042 ( 458113.8, 3777118.9, 455.4, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458123.8, 3777118.9, 455.5, 1732.5, 0.0); 365
2043 ( 458133.8, 3777118.9, 455.6, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458143.8, 3777118.9, 455.6, 1732.5, 0.0);
2044 ( 458153.8, 3777118.9, 455.7, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458163.8, 3777118.9, 455.7, 1732.5, 0.0);
2045 ( 457753.8, 3777128.9, 453.7, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457763.8, 3777128.9, 453.8, 1732.5, 0.0);
2046 ( 457773.8, 3777128.9, 453.8, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457783.8, 3777128.9, 453.9, 1732.5, 0.0);
2047 ( 457793.8, 3777128.9, 454.0, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457803.8, 3777128.9, 454.1, 1732.5, 0.0);
2048 ( 457813.8, 3777128.9, 454.1, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457823.8, 3777128.9, 454.2, 1732.5, 0.0);
2049 ( 457833.8, 3777128.9, 454.2, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457843.8, 3777128.9, 454.3, 1732.5, 0.0);
2050 ( 457853.8, 3777128.9, 454.3, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457863.8, 3777128.9, 454.3, 1732.5, 0.0);
2051 ( 457873.8, 3777128.9, 454.4, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457883.8, 3777128.9, 454.5, 1732.5, 0.0);
2052 ( 457893.8, 3777128.9, 454.6, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457903.8, 3777128.9, 454.6, 1732.5, 0.0);
2053 ( 457913.8, 3777128.9, 454.7, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457923.8, 3777128.9, 454.7, 1732.5, 0.0);
2054 ( 457933.8, 3777128.9, 454.8, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457943.8, 3777128.9, 454.8, 1732.5, 0.0);
2055 ( 457953.8, 3777128.9, 454.8, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457963.8, 3777128.9, 454.9, 1732.5, 0.0);
2056 ( 457973.8, 3777128.9, 455.0, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457983.8, 3777128.9, 455.1, 1732.5, 0.0);
2057 ( 457993.8, 3777128.9, 455.1, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458003.8, 3777128.9, 455.1, 1732.5, 0.0);
2058 ( 458013.8, 3777128.9, 455.2, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458023.8, 3777128.9, 455.2, 1732.5, 0.0);
2059 ( 458033.8, 3777128.9, 455.3, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458043.8, 3777128.9, 455.3, 1732.5, 0.0);
2060 ( 458053.8, 3777128.9, 455.3, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458063.8, 3777128.9, 455.4, 1732.5, 0.0);
2061 ( 458073.8, 3777128.9, 455.5, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458083.8, 3777128.9, 455.6, 1732.5, 0.0);
2062 ( 458093.8, 3777128.9, 455.6, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458103.8, 3777128.9, 455.6, 1732.5, 0.0);
2063 ( 458113.8, 3777128.9, 455.7, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458123.8, 3777128.9, 455.7, 1732.5, 0.0);
2064 ( 458133.8, 3777128.9, 455.8, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458143.8, 3777128.9, 455.8, 1732.5, 0.0);
2065 ( 458153.8, 3777128.9, 455.9, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458163.8, 3777128.9, 456.0, 1732.5, 0.0);
2066 ( 457753.8, 3777138.9, 453.9, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457763.8, 3777138.9, 454.1, 1732.5, 0.0);
2067 ( 457773.8, 3777138.9, 454.1, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457783.8, 3777138.9, 454.2, 1732.5, 0.0);
2068 ( 457793.8, 3777138.9, 454.2, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457803.8, 3777138.9, 454.2, 1732.5, 0.0);
2069 ( 457813.8, 3777138.9, 454.3, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457823.8, 3777138.9, 454.4, 1732.5, 0.0);
2070 ( 457833.8, 3777138.9, 454.4, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457843.8, 3777138.9, 454.6, 1732.5, 0.0);
2071 ( 457853.8, 3777138.9, 454.6, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457863.8, 3777138.9, 454.6, 1732.5, 0.0);
2072 ( 457873.8, 3777138.9, 454.7, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457883.8, 3777138.9, 454.7, 1732.5, 0.0);
2073 ( 457893.8, 3777138.9, 454.8, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457903.8, 3777138.9, 454.8, 1732.5, 0.0);
2074 ( 457913.8, 3777138.9, 454.9, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457923.8, 3777138.9, 454.9, 1732.5, 0.0);
2075 ( 457933.8, 3777138.9, 455.1, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457943.8, 3777138.9, 455.1, 1732.5, 0.0); 366
2076 ( 457953.8, 3777138.9, 455.1, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457963.8, 3777138.9, 455.2, 1732.5, 0.0);
2077 ( 457973.8, 3777138.9, 455.2, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457983.8, 3777138.9, 455.3, 1732.5, 0.0);
2078 ( 457993.8, 3777138.9, 455.3, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458003.8, 3777138.9, 455.3, 1732.5, 0.0);
2079 ( 458013.8, 3777138.9, 455.4, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458023.8, 3777138.9, 455.5, 1732.5, 0.0);
2080 ( 458033.8, 3777138.9, 455.6, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458043.8, 3777138.9, 455.6, 1732.5, 0.0);
2081 ( 458053.8, 3777138.9, 455.6, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458063.8, 3777138.9, 455.7, 1732.5, 0.0);
2082 ( 458073.8, 3777138.9, 455.7, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458083.8, 3777138.9, 455.7, 1732.5, 0.0);
2083 ( 458093.8, 3777138.9, 455.8, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458103.8, 3777138.9, 455.8, 1732.5, 0.0);
2084 ( 458113.8, 3777138.9, 455.9, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458123.8, 3777138.9, 456.0, 1732.5, 0.0);
2085 ( 458133.8, 3777138.9, 456.1, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458143.8, 3777138.9, 456.1, 1732.5, 0.0);
2086 ( 458153.8, 3777138.9, 456.2, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457753.8, 3777148.9, 454.2, 1732.5, 0.0);
2087 FF *** AERMOD - VERSION 22112 *** *** Fontana Square Emisions *** 01/11/23
2088 *** AERMET - VERSION 16216 ***
*** ***
18:41:23
2089
PAGE 11
2090 *** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV NODRYDPLT NOWETDPLT RURAL ADJ_U* 2091
2092 *** DISCRETE CARTESIAN RECEPTORS ***
2093 (X-COORD, Y-COORD, ZELEV, ZHILL, ZFLAG)
2094 (METERS)
2095
2096 ( 457763.8, 3777148.9, 454.2, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457773.8, 3777148.9, 454.3, 1732.5, 0.0);
2097 ( 457783.8, 3777148.9, 454.3, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457793.8, 3777148.9, 454.4, 1732.5, 0.0);
2098 ( 457803.8, 3777148.9, 454.4, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457813.8, 3777148.9, 454.6, 1732.5, 0.0);
2099 ( 457823.8, 3777148.9, 454.6, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457833.8, 3777148.9, 454.7, 1732.5, 0.0);
2100 ( 457843.8, 3777148.9, 454.7, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457853.8, 3777148.9, 454.7, 1732.5, 0.0);
2101 ( 457863.8, 3777148.9, 454.8, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457873.8, 3777148.9, 454.8, 1732.5, 0.0);
2102 ( 457883.8, 3777148.9, 454.9, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457893.8, 3777148.9, 455.1, 1732.5, 0.0);
2103 ( 457903.8, 3777148.9, 455.1, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457913.8, 3777148.9, 455.1, 1732.5, 0.0);
2104 ( 457923.8, 3777148.9, 455.2, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457933.8, 3777148.9, 455.2, 1732.5, 0.0);
2105 ( 457943.8, 3777148.9, 455.3, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457953.8, 3777148.9, 455.3, 1732.5, 0.0);
2106 ( 457963.8, 3777148.9, 455.4, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457973.8, 3777148.9, 455.5, 1732.5, 0.0);
2107 ( 457983.8, 3777148.9, 455.6, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457993.8, 3777148.9, 455.6, 1732.5, 0.0);
2108 ( 458003.8, 3777148.9, 455.6, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458013.8, 3777148.9, 455.7, 1732.5, 0.0);
2109 ( 458023.8, 3777148.9, 455.7, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458033.8, 3777148.9, 455.7, 1732.5, 0.0);
2110 ( 458043.8, 3777148.9, 455.8, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458053.8, 3777148.9, 455.8, 1732.5, 0.0);
2111 ( 458063.8, 3777148.9, 455.8, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458073.8, 367 3777148.9, 455.9, 1732.5, 0.0);
2112 ( 458083.8, 3777148.9, 456.0, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458093.8, 3777148.9, 456.1, 1732.5, 0.0);
2113 ( 458103.8, 3777148.9, 456.1, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458113.8, 3777148.9, 456.2, 1732.5, 0.0);
2114 ( 458123.8, 3777148.9, 456.2, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458133.8, 3777148.9, 456.3, 1732.5, 0.0);
2115 ( 458143.8, 3777148.9, 456.3, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458153.8, 3777148.9, 456.3, 1732.5, 0.0);
2116 ( 457753.8, 3777158.9, 454.3, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457763.8, 3777158.9, 454.4, 1732.5, 0.0);
2117 ( 457773.8, 3777158.9, 454.6, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457783.8, 3777158.9, 454.6, 1732.5, 0.0);
2118 ( 457793.8, 3777158.9, 454.6, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457803.8, 3777158.9, 454.7, 1732.5, 0.0);
2119 ( 457813.8, 3777158.9, 454.7, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457823.8, 3777158.9, 454.8, 1732.5, 0.0);
2120 ( 457833.8, 3777158.9, 454.8, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457843.8, 3777158.9, 454.9, 1732.5, 0.0);
2121 ( 457853.8, 3777158.9, 455.0, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457863.8, 3777158.9, 455.1, 1732.5, 0.0);
2122 ( 457873.8, 3777158.9, 455.1, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457883.8, 3777158.9, 455.2, 1732.5, 0.0);
2123 ( 457893.8, 3777158.9, 455.2, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457903.8, 3777158.9, 455.3, 1732.5, 0.0);
2124 ( 457913.8, 3777158.9, 455.3, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457923.8, 3777158.9, 455.4, 1732.5, 0.0);
2125 ( 457933.8, 3777158.9, 455.5, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457943.8, 3777158.9, 455.6, 1732.5, 0.0);
2126 ( 457953.8, 3777158.9, 455.6, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457963.8, 3777158.9, 455.7, 1732.5, 0.0);
2127 ( 457973.8, 3777158.9, 455.7, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457983.8, 3777158.9, 455.7, 1732.5, 0.0);
2128 ( 457993.8, 3777158.9, 455.8, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458003.8, 3777158.9, 455.8, 1732.5, 0.0);
2129 ( 458013.8, 3777158.9, 455.8, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458023.8, 3777158.9, 455.9, 1732.5, 0.0);
2130 ( 458033.8, 3777158.9, 456.0, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458043.8, 3777158.9, 456.1, 1732.5, 0.0);
2131 ( 458053.8, 3777158.9, 456.1, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458063.8, 3777158.9, 456.2, 1732.5, 0.0);
2132 ( 458073.8, 3777158.9, 456.2, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458083.8, 3777158.9, 456.3, 1732.5, 0.0);
2133 ( 458093.8, 3777158.9, 456.3, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458103.8, 3777158.9, 456.3, 1732.5, 0.0);
2134 ( 458113.8, 3777158.9, 456.4, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458123.8, 3777158.9, 456.5, 1732.5, 0.0);
2135 ( 458133.8, 3777158.9, 456.6, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457753.8, 3777168.9, 454.6, 1732.5, 0.0);
2136 ( 457763.8, 3777168.9, 454.7, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457773.8, 3777168.9, 454.7, 1732.5, 0.0);
2137 ( 457783.8, 3777168.9, 454.7, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457793.8, 3777168.9, 454.8, 1732.5, 0.0);
2138 ( 457803.8, 3777168.9, 454.9, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457813.8, 3777168.9, 454.9, 1732.5, 0.0);
2139 ( 457823.8, 3777168.9, 455.1, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457833.8, 3777168.9, 455.1, 1732.5, 0.0);
2140 ( 457843.8, 3777168.9, 455.2, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457853.8, 3777168.9, 455.2, 1732.5, 0.0);
2141 FF *** AERMOD - VERSION 22112 *** *** Fontana Square Emisions *** 01/11/23
2142 *** AERMET - VERSION 16216 ***
*** ***
18:41:23
2143
PAGE 12 368
2144 *** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV NODRYDPLT NOWETDPLT RURAL ADJ_U* 2145
2146 *** DISCRETE CARTESIAN RECEPTORS ***
2147 (X-COORD, Y-COORD, ZELEV, ZHILL, ZFLAG)
2148 (METERS)
2149
2150 ( 457863.8, 3777168.9, 455.2, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457873.8, 3777168.9, 455.3, 1732.5, 0.0);
2151 ( 457883.8, 3777168.9, 455.3, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457893.8, 3777168.9, 455.4, 1732.5, 0.0);
2152 ( 457903.8, 3777168.9, 455.6, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457913.8, 3777168.9, 455.6, 1732.5, 0.0);
2153 ( 457923.8, 3777168.9, 455.7, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457933.8, 3777168.9, 455.7, 1732.5, 0.0);
2154 ( 457943.8, 3777168.9, 455.8, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457953.8, 3777168.9, 455.8, 1732.5, 0.0);
2155 ( 457963.8, 3777168.9, 455.8, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457973.8, 3777168.9, 455.9, 1732.5, 0.0);
2156 ( 457983.8, 3777168.9, 456.0, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457993.8, 3777168.9, 456.1, 1732.5, 0.0);
2157 ( 458003.8, 3777168.9, 456.1, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458013.8, 3777168.9, 456.1, 1732.5, 0.0);
2158 ( 458023.8, 3777168.9, 456.2, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458033.8, 3777168.9, 456.2, 1732.5, 0.0);
2159 ( 458043.8, 3777168.9, 456.3, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458053.8, 3777168.9, 456.3, 1732.5, 0.0);
2160 ( 458063.8, 3777168.9, 456.4, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458073.8, 3777168.9, 456.5, 1732.5, 0.0);
2161 ( 458083.8, 3777168.9, 456.6, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458093.8, 3777168.9, 456.6, 1732.5, 0.0);
2162 ( 457753.8, 3777178.9, 454.8, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457763.8, 3777178.9, 454.8, 1732.5, 0.0);
2163 ( 457773.8, 3777178.9, 454.9, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457783.8, 3777178.9, 455.0, 1732.5, 0.0);
2164 ( 457793.8, 3777178.9, 455.1, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457803.8, 3777178.9, 455.1, 1732.5, 0.0);
2165 ( 457813.8, 3777178.9, 455.2, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457823.8, 3777178.9, 455.2, 1732.5, 0.0);
2166 ( 457833.8, 3777178.9, 455.3, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457843.8, 3777178.9, 455.3, 1732.5, 0.0);
2167 ( 457853.8, 3777178.9, 455.4, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457863.8, 3777178.9, 455.5, 1732.5, 0.0);
2168 ( 457873.8, 3777178.9, 455.6, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457883.8, 3777178.9, 455.6, 1732.5, 0.0);
2169 ( 457893.8, 3777178.9, 455.7, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457903.8, 3777178.9, 455.7, 1732.5, 0.0);
2170 ( 457913.8, 3777178.9, 455.8, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457923.8, 3777178.9, 455.9, 1732.5, 0.0);
2171 ( 457933.8, 3777178.9, 456.0, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457943.8, 3777178.9, 456.1, 1732.5, 0.0);
2172 ( 457953.8, 3777178.9, 456.1, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457963.8, 3777178.9, 456.1, 1732.5, 0.0);
2173 ( 457973.8, 3777178.9, 456.2, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 457983.8, 3777178.9, 456.2, 1732.5, 0.0);
2174 ( 457993.8, 3777178.9, 456.3, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458003.8, 3777178.9, 456.3, 1732.5, 0.0);
2175 ( 458013.8, 3777178.9, 456.3, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458023.8, 3777178.9, 456.4, 1732.5, 0.0);
2176 ( 458033.8, 3777178.9, 456.5, 1732.5, 0.0); ( 458043.8, 3777178.9, 456.6, 1732.5, 0.0);
2177 ( 458053.8, 3777178.9, 456.6, 1732.5,

0.0);
2178 FF *** AERMOD - VERSION 22112 *** *** Fontana Square Emisions *** 01/11/23
2179 *** AERMET - VERSION 16216 ***
*** *** 369
18:41:23
2180
PAGE 13
2181 *** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV NODRYDPLT NOWETDPLT RURAL ADJ_U* 2182
2183 *** METEOROLOGICAL DAYS SELECTED FOR
PROCESSING ***
2184 (1=YES; 0=NO)
2185
2186 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
2187 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
2188 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
2189 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
2190 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
2191 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
2192 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
2193 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
2194
2195 NOTE: METEOROLOGICAL DATA ACTUALLY PROCESSED WILL ALSO DEPEND ON WHAT IS INCLUDED IN THE DATA FILE.
2196
2197
2198
2199 *** UPPER BOUND OF FIRST THROUGH FIFTH WIND SPEED
CATEGORIES ***
2200 (METERS/SEC)
2201
2202 1.54, 3.09, 5.14, 8.23, 10.80,
2203 FF *** AERMOD - VERSION 22112 *** *** Fontana Square Emisions *** 01/11/23
2204 *** AERMET - VERSION 16216 ***
*** ***
18:41:23
2205
PAGE 14
2206 *** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV NODRYDPLT NOWETDPLT RURAL ADJ_U* 2207
2208 *** UP TO THE FIRST 24 HOURS OF METEOROLOGICAL DATA ***
2209
2210 Surface file: C:\Users\jclar\OneDrive\Clark and Associates\Project 204 - ABJC - Fontana Squar Met Version: 16216
2211 Profile file: C:\Users\jclar\OneDrive\Clark and Associates\Project 204 - ABJC - Fontana Squar
2212 Surface format:

FREE
2213 Profile format:

FREE
2214 Surface station no.: 3102 Upper air station no.: 3190 2215 Name: UNKNOWN Name:

UNKNOWN
2216 Year: 2011 Year: 2011
2217
2218 First 24 hours of scalar data
2219 YR MO DY JDY HR H0 U* W* DT/DZ ZICNV ZIMCH M-O LEN Z0 BOWEN ALBEDO

REF WS WD HT REF TA HT
2220 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 370 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
2221 11 01 01 1 01 -18.5 0.194 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 204. 41.2 0.25 2.82 1.00

1.80 69. 9.1 276.4 5.5
2222 11 01 01 1 02 -23.8 0.239 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 281. 63.0 0.25 2.82 1.00

2.20 52. 9.1 275.4 5.5
2223 11 01 01 1 03 -18.5 0.194 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 205. 41.2 0.25 2.82 1.00

1.80 32. 9.1 275.4 5.5
2224 11 01 01 1 04 -1.4 0.067 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 57. 18.3 0.25 2.82 1.00

0.40 27. 9.1 274.2 5.5
2225 11 01 01 1 05 -18.6 0.194 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 204. 41.2 0.25 2.82 1.00

1.80 51. 9.1 274.2 5.5
2226 11 01 01 1 06 -29.7 0.296 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 387. 96.6 0.25 2.82 1.00

2.70 53. 9.1 274.2 5.5
2227 11 01 01 1 07 -24.0 0.239 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 282. 63.0 0.25 2.82 1.00

2.20 70. 9.1 274.2 5.5
2228 11 01 01 1 08 -8.4 0.138 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 127. 27.3 0.25 2.82 0.54

1.30 72. 9.1 275.4 5.5
2229 11 01 01 1 09 44.3 0.280 0.571 0.005 147. 356. -43.5 0.25 2.82 0.32

2.20 67. 9.1 277.5 5.5
2230 11 01 01 1 10 122.7 0.264 0.952 0.005 247. 326. -13.2 0.25 2.82 0.25

1.80 83. 9.1 279.9 5.5
2231 11 01 01 1 11 179.8 0.316 1.733 0.005 1017. 426. -15.4 0.25 2.82 0.22

2.20 58. 9.1 282.0 5.5
2232 11 01 01 1 12 206.0 0.320 1.940 0.008 1244. 435. -14.0 0.25 2.82 0.21

2.20 115. 9.1 283.1 5.5
2233 11 01 01 1 13 132.6 0.214 1.733 0.009 1377. 243. -6.5 0.25 2.82 0.21

1.30 147. 9.1 284.2 5.5
2234 11 01 01 1 14 147.0 0.216 1.818 0.009 1431. 242. -6.0 0.25 2.82 0.23

1.30 219. 9.1 284.9 5.5
2235 11 01 01 1 15 104.0 0.208 1.633 0.009 1468. 228. -7.6 0.25 2.82 0.26

1.30 126. 9.1 285.4 5.5
2236 11 01 01 1 16 26.4 0.140 1.037 0.009 1477. 127. -9.1 0.25 2.82 0.35

0.90 151. 9.1 284.9 5.5
2237 11 01 01 1 17 -9.0 0.137 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 121. 24.9 0.25 2.82 0.63

1.30 69. 9.1 283.1 5.5
2238 11 01 01 1 18 -33.4 0.342 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 481. 129.0 0.25 2.82 1.00

3.10 81. 9.1 281.4 5.5
2239 11 01 01 1 19 -33.6 0.342 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 481. 128.9 0.25 2.82 1.00

3.10 51. 9.1 279.9 5.5
2240 11 01 01 1 20 -23.6 0.239 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 287. 63.1 0.25 2.82 1.00

2.20 77. 9.1 278.8 5.5
2241 11 01 01 1 21 -18.5 0.194 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 205. 41.2 0.25 2.82 1.00

1.80 53. 9.1 277.5 5.5
2242 11 01 01 1 22 -23.7 0.239 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 281. 63.0 0.25 2.82 1.00

2.20 58. 9.1 277.5 5.5
2243 11 01 01 1 23 -18.5 0.194 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 205. 41.2 0.25 2.82 1.00

1.80 64. 9.1 277.5 5.5
2244 11 01 01 1 24 -4.5 0.094 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 74. 16.3 0.25 2.82 1.00

0.90 52. 9.1 277.0 5.5
2245
2246
2247 First hour of profile data
2248 YR MO DY HR HEIGHT F WDIR WSPD AMB_TMP sigmaA sigmaW sigmaV 2249 11 01 01 01 5.5 0 -999. -99.00 276.5 99.0 -99.00 -99.00 2250 11 01 01 01 9.1 1 69. 1.80 -999.0 99.0 -99.00 -99.00 2251
2252 F indicates top of profile (=1) or below (=0)
2253 FF *** AERMOD - VERSION 22112 *** *** Fontana Square Emisions *** 01/11/23
2254 *** AERMET - VERSION 16216 ***
*** ***
18:41:23
2255
PAGE 15
2256 *** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV NODRYDPLT NOWETDPLT RURAL ADJ_U* 2257 371
2258 *** THE PERIOD ( 43848 HRS) AVERAGE CONCENTRATION VALUES FOR SOURCE GROUP: ALL ***
2259 INCLUDING SOURCE(S): E5FG71XG , E5FG71XH ,
2260
2261 *** DISCRETE CARTESIAN RECEPTOR POINTS ***
2262
2263 ** CONC OF EXHAUST IN
MICROGRAMS/M**3 **
2264
2265 X-COORD (M) Y-COORD (M) CONC X-COORD (M) Y-COORD
(M) CONC
2266 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
2267 457753.80 3776998.90 0.01395 457763.80
3776998.90 0.01453
2268 457773.80 3776998.90 0.01511 457783.80
3776998.90 0.01567
2269 457793.80 3776998.90 0.01624 457803.80
3776998.90 0.01682
2270 457813.80 3776998.90 0.01739 457823.80
3776998.90 0.01797
2271 457833.80 3776998.90 0.01854 457843.80
3776998.90 0.01911
2272 457853.80 3776998.90 0.01969 457863.80
3776998.90 0.02025
2273 457873.80 3776998.90 0.02081 457883.80
3776998.90 0.02137
2274 457893.80 3776998.90 0.02194 457903.80
3776998.90 0.02251
2275 457913.80 3776998.90 0.02307 457923.80
3776998.90 0.02361
2276 457933.80 3776998.90 0.02414 457943.80
3776998.90 0.02464
2277 457953.80 3776998.90 0.02511 457963.80
3776998.90 0.02553
2278 457973.80 3776998.90 0.02588 457983.80
3776998.90 0.02614
2279 457993.80 3776998.90 0.02630 458003.80
3776998.90 0.02634
2280 458013.80 3776998.90 0.02626 458023.80
3776998.90 0.02606
2281 458033.80 3776998.90 0.02573 458043.80
3776998.90 0.02527
2282 458053.80 3776998.90 0.02469 458063.80
3776998.90 0.02396
2283 458073.80 3776998.90 0.02314 458083.80
3776998.90 0.02223
2284 458093.80 3776998.90 0.02126 458103.80
3776998.90 0.02024
2285 458113.80 3776998.90 0.01921 458123.80
3776998.90 0.01818
2286 458133.80 3776998.90 0.01713 458143.80
3776998.90 0.01613
2287 458153.80 3776998.90 0.01516 458163.80
3776998.90 0.01424
2288 457753.80 3777008.90 0.01425 457763.80
3777008.90 0.01486
2289 457773.80 3777008.90 0.01547 457783.80
3777008.90 0.01607
2290 457793.80 3777008.90 0.01668 457803.80
3777008.90 0.01729
2291 457813.80 3777008.90 0.01792 457823.80
3777008.90 0.01854
2292 457833.80 3777008.90 0.01915 457843.80
3777008.90 0.01975
2293 457853.80 3777008.90 0.02036 457863.80 372
3777008.90 0.02097
2294 457873.80 3777008.90 0.02158 457883.80
3777008.90 0.02219
2295 457893.80 3777008.90 0.02280 457903.80
3777008.90 0.02342
2296 457913.80 3777008.90 0.02404 457923.80
3777008.90 0.02465
2297 457933.80 3777008.90 0.02526 457943.80
3777008.90 0.02584
2298 457953.80 3777008.90 0.02639 457963.80
3777008.90 0.02688
2299 457973.80 3777008.90 0.02732 457983.80
3777008.90 0.02769
2300 457993.80 3777008.90 0.02792 458003.80
3777008.90 0.02803
2301 458013.80 3777008.90 0.02801 458023.80
3777008.90 0.02785
2302 458033.80 3777008.90 0.02754 458043.80
3777008.90 0.02708
2303 458053.80 3777008.90 0.02645 458063.80
3777008.90 0.02568
2304 458073.80 3777008.90 0.02481 458083.80
3777008.90 0.02385
2305 458093.80 3777008.90 0.02281 458103.80
3777008.90 0.02168
2306 458113.80 3777008.90 0.02053 458123.80
3777008.90 0.01938
2307 FF *** AERMOD - VERSION 22112 *** *** Fontana Square Emisions *** 01/11/23
2308 *** AERMET - VERSION 16216 ***
*** ***
18:41:23
2309
PAGE 16
2310 *** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV NODRYDPLT NOWETDPLT RURAL ADJ_U* 2311
2312 *** THE PERIOD ( 43848 HRS) AVERAGE CONCENTRATION VALUES FOR SOURCE GROUP: ALL ***
2313 INCLUDING SOURCE(S): E5FG71XG , E5FG71XH ,
2314
2315 *** DISCRETE CARTESIAN RECEPTOR POINTS ***
2316
2317 ** CONC OF EXHAUST IN
MICROGRAMS/M**3 **
2318
2319 X-COORD (M) Y-COORD (M) CONC X-COORD (M) Y-COORD
(M) CONC
2320 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
2321 458133.80 3777008.90 0.01823 458143.80
3777008.90 0.01714
2322 458153.80 3777008.90 0.01608 458163.80
3777008.90 0.01507
2323 457753.80 3777018.90 0.01453 457763.80
3777018.90 0.01518
2324 457773.80 3777018.90 0.01583 457783.80
3777018.90 0.01649
2325 457793.80 3777018.90 0.01715 457803.80
3777018.90 0.01780
2326 457813.80 3777018.90 0.01846 457823.80
3777018.90 0.01912
2327 457833.80 3777018.90 0.01976 457843.80
3777018.90 0.02041
2328 457853.80 3777018.90 0.02106 457863.80
3777018.90 0.02173
2329 457873.80 3777018.90 0.02241 457883.80 373
3777018.90 0.02306
2330 457893.80 3777018.90 0.02373 457903.80
3777018.90 0.02442
2331 457913.80 3777018.90 0.02511 457923.80
3777018.90 0.02579
2332 457933.80 3777018.90 0.02647 457943.80
3777018.90 0.02713
2333 457953.80 3777018.90 0.02777 457963.80
3777018.90 0.02837
2334 457973.80 3777018.90 0.02890 457983.80
3777018.90 0.02934
2335 457993.80 3777018.90 0.02966 458003.80
3777018.90 0.02984
2336 458013.80 3777018.90 0.02988 458023.80
3777018.90 0.02978
2337 458033.80 3777018.90 0.02950 458043.80
3777018.90 0.02906
2338 458053.80 3777018.90 0.02845 458063.80
3777018.90 0.02765
2339 458073.80 3777018.90 0.02673 458083.80
3777018.90 0.02566
2340 458093.80 3777018.90 0.02450 458103.80
3777018.90 0.02326
2341 458113.80 3777018.90 0.02201 458123.80
3777018.90 0.02075
2342 458133.80 3777018.90 0.01947 458143.80
3777018.90 0.01825
2343 458153.80 3777018.90 0.01707 458163.80
3777018.90 0.01595
2344 457753.80 3777028.90 0.01484 457763.80
3777028.90 0.01552
2345 457773.80 3777028.90 0.01623 457783.80
3777028.90 0.01693
2346 457793.80 3777028.90 0.01763 457803.80
3777028.90 0.01833
2347 457813.80 3777028.90 0.01903 457823.80
3777028.90 0.01973
2348 457833.80 3777028.90 0.02044 457843.80
3777028.90 0.02113
2349 457853.80 3777028.90 0.02182 457863.80
3777028.90 0.02253
2350 457873.80 3777028.90 0.02324 457883.80
3777028.90 0.02395
2351 457893.80 3777028.90 0.02469 457903.80
3777028.90 0.02542
2352 457913.80 3777028.90 0.02617 457923.80
3777028.90 0.02693
2353 457933.80 3777028.90 0.02771 457943.80
3777028.90 0.02847
2354 457953.80 3777028.90 0.02921 457963.80
3777028.90 0.02990
2355 457973.80 3777028.90 0.03056 457983.80
3777028.90 0.03114
2356 457993.80 3777028.90 0.03157 458003.80
3777028.90 0.03185
2357 458013.80 3777028.90 0.03199 458023.80
3777028.90 0.03195
2358 458033.80 3777028.90 0.03172 458043.80
3777028.90 0.03129
2359 458053.80 3777028.90 0.03065 458063.80
3777028.90 0.02982
2360 458073.80 3777028.90 0.02881 458083.80
3777028.90 0.02768
2361 FF *** AERMOD - VERSION 22112 *** *** Fontana Square Emisions *** 01/11/23
2362 *** AERMET - VERSION 16216 *** 374
*** ***
18:41:23
2363
PAGE 17
2364 *** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV NODRYDPLT NOWETDPLT RURAL ADJ_U* 2365
2366 *** THE PERIOD ( 43848 HRS) AVERAGE CONCENTRATION VALUES FOR SOURCE GROUP: ALL ***
2367 INCLUDING SOURCE(S): E5FG71XG , E5FG71XH ,
2368
2369 *** DISCRETE CARTESIAN RECEPTOR POINTS ***
2370
2371 ** CONC OF EXHAUST IN
MICROGRAMS/M**3 **
2372
2373 X-COORD (M) Y-COORD (M) CONC X-COORD (M) Y-COORD
(M) CONC
2374 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
2375 458093.80 3777028.90 0.02644 458103.80
3777028.90 0.02508
2376 458113.80 3777028.90 0.02367 458123.80
3777028.90 0.02225
2377 458133.80 3777028.90 0.02084 458143.80
3777028.90 0.01947
2378 458153.80 3777028.90 0.01817 458163.80
3777028.90 0.01695
2379 457753.80 3777038.90 0.01512 457763.80
3777038.90 0.01586
2380 457773.80 3777038.90 0.01661 457783.80
3777038.90 0.01738
2381 457793.80 3777038.90 0.01814 457803.80
3777038.90 0.01889
2382 457813.80 3777038.90 0.01963 457823.80
3777038.90 0.02038
2383 457833.80 3777038.90 0.02112 457843.80
3777038.90 0.02186
2384 457853.80 3777038.90 0.02260 457863.80
3777038.90 0.02335
2385 457873.80 3777038.90 0.02410 457883.80
3777038.90 0.02489
2386 457893.80 3777038.90 0.02571 457903.80
3777038.90 0.02651
2387 457913.80 3777038.90 0.02733 457923.80
3777038.90 0.02818
2388 457933.80 3777038.90 0.02905 457943.80
3777038.90 0.02990
2389 457953.80 3777038.90 0.03077 457963.80
3777038.90 0.03160
2390 457973.80 3777038.90 0.03236 457983.80
3777038.90 0.03305
2391 457993.80 3777038.90 0.03361 458003.80
3777038.90 0.03402
2392 458013.80 3777038.90 0.03425 458023.80
3777038.90 0.03431
2393 458033.80 3777038.90 0.03414 458043.80
3777038.90 0.03375
2394 458053.80 3777038.90 0.03315 458063.80
3777038.90 0.03229
2395 458073.80 3777038.90 0.03123 458083.80
3777038.90 0.02999
2396 458093.80 3777038.90 0.02858 458103.80
3777038.90 0.02708
2397 458113.80 3777038.90 0.02555 458123.80
3777038.90 0.02397
2398 458133.80 3777038.90 0.02239 458143.80 375
3777038.90 0.02087
2399 458153.80 3777038.90 0.01941 458163.80
3777038.90 0.01803
2400 457753.80 3777048.90 0.01542 457763.80
3777048.90 0.01622
2401 457773.80 3777048.90 0.01702 457783.80
3777048.90 0.01784
2402 457793.80 3777048.90 0.01865 457803.80
3777048.90 0.01946
2403 457813.80 3777048.90 0.02025 457823.80
3777048.90 0.02105
2404 457833.80 3777048.90 0.02185 457843.80
3777048.90 0.02265
2405 457853.80 3777048.90 0.02344 457863.80
3777048.90 0.02424
2406 457873.80 3777048.90 0.02506 457883.80
3777048.90 0.02589
2407 457893.80 3777048.90 0.02674 457903.80
3777048.90 0.02762
2408 457913.80 3777048.90 0.02852 457923.80
3777048.90 0.02945
2409 457933.80 3777048.90 0.03040 457943.80
3777048.90 0.03138
2410 457953.80 3777048.90 0.03237 457963.80
3777048.90 0.03332
2411 457973.80 3777048.90 0.03427 457983.80
3777048.90 0.03514
2412 457993.80 3777048.90 0.03586 458003.80
3777048.90 0.03643
2413 458013.80 3777048.90 0.03683 458023.80
3777048.90 0.03699
2414 458033.80 3777048.90 0.03692 458043.80
3777048.90 0.03656
2415 FF *** AERMOD - VERSION 22112 *** *** Fontana Square Emisions *** 01/11/23
2416 *** AERMET - VERSION 16216 ***
*** ***
18:41:23
2417
PAGE 18
2418 *** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV NODRYDPLT NOWETDPLT RURAL ADJ_U* 2419
2420 *** THE PERIOD ( 43848 HRS) AVERAGE CONCENTRATION VALUES FOR SOURCE GROUP: ALL ***
2421 INCLUDING SOURCE(S): E5FG71XG , E5FG71XH ,
2422
2423 *** DISCRETE CARTESIAN RECEPTOR POINTS ***
2424
2425 ** CONC OF EXHAUST IN
MICROGRAMS/M**3 **
2426
2427 X-COORD (M) Y-COORD (M) CONC X-COORD (M) Y-COORD
(M) CONC
2428 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
2429 458053.80 3777048.90 0.03591 458063.80
3777048.90 0.03502
2430 458073.80 3777048.90 0.03393 458083.80
3777048.90 0.03261
2431 458093.80 3777048.90 0.03107 458103.80
3777048.90 0.02940
2432 458113.80 3777048.90 0.02767 458123.80
3777048.90 0.02589
2433 458133.80 3777048.90 0.02412 458143.80
3777048.90 0.02240
2434 458153.80 3777048.90 0.02077 458163.80 376
3777048.90 0.01925
2435 457753.80 3777058.90 0.01571 457763.80
3777058.90 0.01657
2436 457773.80 3777058.90 0.01743 457783.80
3777058.90 0.01831
2437 457793.80 3777058.90 0.01920 457803.80
3777058.90 0.02008
2438 457813.80 3777058.90 0.02093 457823.80
3777058.90 0.02179
2439 457833.80 3777058.90 0.02263 457843.80
3777058.90 0.02347
2440 457853.80 3777058.90 0.02431 457863.80
3777058.90 0.02515
2441 457873.80 3777058.90 0.02602 457883.80
3777058.90 0.02691
2442 457893.80 3777058.90 0.02784 457903.80
3777058.90 0.02882
2443 457913.80 3777058.90 0.02979 457923.80
3777058.90 0.03082
2444 457933.80 3777058.90 0.03189 457943.80
3777058.90 0.03298
2445 457953.80 3777058.90 0.03410 457963.80
3777058.90 0.03522
2446 457973.80 3777058.90 0.03633 457983.80
3777058.90 0.03736
2447 457993.80 3777058.90 0.03826 458003.80
3777058.90 0.03901
2448 458013.80 3777058.90 0.03957 458023.80
3777058.90 0.03989
2449 458033.80 3777058.90 0.03994 458043.80
3777058.90 0.03970
2450 458053.80 3777058.90 0.03909 458063.80
3777058.90 0.03818
2451 458073.80 3777058.90 0.03700 458083.80
3777058.90 0.03555
2452 458093.80 3777058.90 0.03385 458103.80
3777058.90 0.03200
2453 458113.80 3777058.90 0.03009 458123.80
3777058.90 0.02811
2454 458133.80 3777058.90 0.02610 458143.80
3777058.90 0.02417
2455 458153.80 3777058.90 0.02232 458163.80
3777058.90 0.02059
2456 457753.80 3777068.90 0.01599 457763.80
3777068.90 0.01692
2457 457773.80 3777068.90 0.01788 457783.80
3777068.90 0.01883
2458 457793.80 3777068.90 0.01977 457803.80
3777068.90 0.02072
2459 457813.80 3777068.90 0.02164 457823.80
3777068.90 0.02255
2460 457833.80 3777068.90 0.02345 457843.80
3777068.90 0.02436
2461 457853.80 3777068.90 0.02527 457863.80
3777068.90 0.02617
2462 457873.80 3777068.90 0.02709 457883.80
3777068.90 0.02802
2463 457893.80 3777068.90 0.02901 457903.80
3777068.90 0.03004
2464 457913.80 3777068.90 0.03111 457923.80
3777068.90 0.03221
2465 457933.80 3777068.90 0.03338 457943.80
3777068.90 0.03462
2466 457953.80 3777068.90 0.03590 457963.80
3777068.90 0.03718
2467 457973.80 3777068.90 0.03850 457983.80 377
3777068.90 0.03978
2468 457993.80 3777068.90 0.04091 458003.80
3777068.90 0.04189
2469 FF *** AERMOD - VERSION 22112 *** *** Fontana Square Emisions *** 01/11/23
2470 *** AERMET - VERSION 16216 ***
*** ***
18:41:23
2471
PAGE 19
2472 *** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV NODRYDPLT NOWETDPLT RURAL ADJ_U* 2473
2474 *** THE PERIOD ( 43848 HRS) AVERAGE CONCENTRATION VALUES FOR SOURCE GROUP: ALL ***
2475 INCLUDING SOURCE(S): E5FG71XG , E5FG71XH ,
2476
2477 *** DISCRETE CARTESIAN RECEPTOR POINTS ***
2478
2479 ** CONC OF EXHAUST IN
MICROGRAMS/M**3 **
2480
2481 X-COORD (M) Y-COORD (M) CONC X-COORD (M) Y-COORD
(M) CONC
2482 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
2483 458013.80 3777068.90 0.04267 458023.80
3777068.90 0.04318
2484 458033.80 3777068.90 0.04338 458043.80
3777068.90 0.04320
2485 458053.80 3777068.90 0.04263 458063.80
3777068.90 0.04173
2486 458073.80 3777068.90 0.04052 458083.80
3777068.90 0.03897
2487 458093.80 3777068.90 0.03711 458103.80
3777068.90 0.03506
2488 458113.80 3777068.90 0.03287 458123.80
3777068.90 0.03061
2489 458133.80 3777068.90 0.02832 458143.80
3777068.90 0.02611
2490 458153.80 3777068.90 0.02404 458163.80
3777068.90 0.02211
2491 457753.80 3777078.90 0.01630 457763.80
3777078.90 0.01729
2492 457773.80 3777078.90 0.01831 457783.80
3777078.90 0.01934
2493 457793.80 3777078.90 0.02037 457803.80
3777078.90 0.02141
2494 457813.80 3777078.90 0.02242 457823.80
3777078.90 0.02340
2495 457833.80 3777078.90 0.02436 457843.80
3777078.90 0.02531
2496 457853.80 3777078.90 0.02627 457863.80
3777078.90 0.02722
2497 457873.80 3777078.90 0.02818 457883.80
3777078.90 0.02918
2498 457893.80 3777078.90 0.03023 457903.80
3777078.90 0.03134
2499 457913.80 3777078.90 0.03252 457923.80
3777078.90 0.03372
2500 457933.80 3777078.90 0.03501 457943.80
3777078.90 0.03639
2501 457953.80 3777078.90 0.03782 457963.80
3777078.90 0.03931
2502 457973.80 3777078.90 0.04085 457983.80
3777078.90 0.04234
2503 457993.80 3777078.90 0.04374 458003.80 378
3777078.90 0.04499
2504 458013.80 3777078.90 0.04603 458023.80
3777078.90 0.04678
2505 458033.80 3777078.90 0.04719 458043.80
3777078.90 0.04721
2506 458053.80 3777078.90 0.04675 458063.80
3777078.90 0.04590
2507 458073.80 3777078.90 0.04459 458083.80
3777078.90 0.04287
2508 458093.80 3777078.90 0.04081 458103.80
3777078.90 0.03852
2509 458113.80 3777078.90 0.03609 458123.80
3777078.90 0.03354
2510 458133.80 3777078.90 0.03093 458143.80
3777078.90 0.02840
2511 458153.80 3777078.90 0.02600 458163.80
3777078.90 0.02379
2512 457753.80 3777088.90 0.01657 457763.80
3777088.90 0.01766
2513 457773.80 3777088.90 0.01878 457783.80
3777088.90 0.01992
2514 457793.80 3777088.90 0.02105 457803.80
3777088.90 0.02216
2515 457813.80 3777088.90 0.02325 457823.80
3777088.90 0.02430
2516 457833.80 3777088.90 0.02532 457843.80
3777088.90 0.02633
2517 457853.80 3777088.90 0.02737 457863.80
3777088.90 0.02841
2518 457873.80 3777088.90 0.02942 457883.80
3777088.90 0.03047
2519 457893.80 3777088.90 0.03157 457903.80
3777088.90 0.03273
2520 457913.80 3777088.90 0.03397 457923.80
3777088.90 0.03527
2521 457933.80 3777088.90 0.03666 457943.80
3777088.90 0.03818
2522 457953.80 3777088.90 0.03981 457963.80
3777088.90 0.04150
2523 FF *** AERMOD - VERSION 22112 *** *** Fontana Square Emisions *** 01/11/23
2524 *** AERMET - VERSION 16216 ***
*** ***
18:41:23
2525
PAGE 20
2526 *** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV NODRYDPLT NOWETDPLT RURAL ADJ_U* 2527
2528 *** THE PERIOD ( 43848 HRS) AVERAGE CONCENTRATION VALUES FOR SOURCE GROUP: ALL ***
2529 INCLUDING SOURCE(S): E5FG71XG , E5FG71XH ,
2530
2531 *** DISCRETE CARTESIAN RECEPTOR POINTS ***
2532
2533 ** CONC OF EXHAUST IN
MICROGRAMS/M**3 **
2534
2535 X-COORD (M) Y-COORD (M) CONC X-COORD (M) Y-COORD
(M) CONC
2536 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
2537 457973.80 3777088.90 0.04330 457983.80
3777088.90 0.04513
2538 457993.80 3777088.90 0.04687 458003.80
3777088.90 0.04849
2539 458013.80 3777088.90 0.04984 458023.80 379
3777088.90 0.05091
2540 458033.80 3777088.90 0.05158 458043.80
3777088.90 0.05173
2541 458053.80 3777088.90 0.05141 458063.80
3777088.90 0.05056
2542 458073.80 3777088.90 0.04924 458083.80
3777088.90 0.04746
2543 458093.80 3777088.90 0.04521 458103.80
3777088.90 0.04267
2544 458113.80 3777088.90 0.03987 458123.80
3777088.90 0.03690
2545 458133.80 3777088.90 0.03389 458143.80
3777088.90 0.03098
2546 458153.80 3777088.90 0.02823 458163.80
3777088.90 0.02570
2547 457753.80 3777098.90 0.01685 457763.80
3777098.90 0.01804
2548 457773.80 3777098.90 0.01927 457783.80
3777098.90 0.02051
2549 457793.80 3777098.90 0.02174 457803.80
3777098.90 0.02296
2550 457813.80 3777098.90 0.02417 457823.80
3777098.90 0.02534
2551 457833.80 3777098.90 0.02644 457843.80
3777098.90 0.02752
2552 457853.80 3777098.90 0.02859 457863.80
3777098.90 0.02966
2553 457873.80 3777098.90 0.03072 457883.80
3777098.90 0.03182
2554 457893.80 3777098.90 0.03298 457903.80
3777098.90 0.03420
2555 457913.80 3777098.90 0.03553 457923.80
3777098.90 0.03696
2556 457933.80 3777098.90 0.03847 457943.80
3777098.90 0.04013
2557 457953.80 3777098.90 0.04193 457963.80
3777098.90 0.04390
2558 457973.80 3777098.90 0.04595 457983.80
3777098.90 0.04805
2559 457993.80 3777098.90 0.05015 458003.80
3777098.90 0.05218
2560 458013.80 3777098.90 0.05398 458023.80
3777098.90 0.05547
2561 458033.80 3777098.90 0.05653 458043.80
3777098.90 0.05697
2562 458053.80 3777098.90 0.05684 458063.80
3777098.90 0.05609
2563 458073.80 3777098.90 0.05473 458083.80
3777098.90 0.05277
2564 458093.80 3777098.90 0.05027 458103.80
3777098.90 0.04739
2565 458113.80 3777098.90 0.04426 458123.80
3777098.90 0.04091
2566 458133.80 3777098.90 0.03744 458143.80
3777098.90 0.03406
2567 458153.80 3777098.90 0.03086 458163.80
3777098.90 0.02792
2568 457753.80 3777108.90 0.01710 457763.80
3777108.90 0.01839
2569 457773.80 3777108.90 0.01977 457783.80
3777108.90 0.02116
2570 457793.80 3777108.90 0.02254 457803.80
3777108.90 0.02389
2571 457813.80 3777108.90 0.02520 457823.80
3777108.90 0.02646
2572 457833.80 3777108.90 0.02765 457843.80 380
3777108.90 0.02879
2573 457853.80 3777108.90 0.02992 457863.80
3777108.90 0.03104
2574 457873.80 3777108.90 0.03219 457883.80
3777108.90 0.03338
2575 457893.80 3777108.90 0.03457 457903.80
3777108.90 0.03585
2576 457913.80 3777108.90 0.03722 457923.80
3777108.90 0.03871
2577 FF *** AERMOD - VERSION 22112 *** *** Fontana Square Emisions *** 01/11/23
2578 *** AERMET - VERSION 16216 ***
*** ***
18:41:23
2579
PAGE 21
2580 *** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV NODRYDPLT NOWETDPLT RURAL ADJ_U* 2581
2582 *** THE PERIOD ( 43848 HRS) AVERAGE CONCENTRATION VALUES FOR SOURCE GROUP: ALL ***
2583 INCLUDING SOURCE(S): E5FG71XG , E5FG71XH ,
2584
2585 *** DISCRETE CARTESIAN RECEPTOR POINTS ***
2586
2587 ** CONC OF EXHAUST IN
MICROGRAMS/M**3 **
2588
2589 X-COORD (M) Y-COORD (M) CONC X-COORD (M) Y-COORD
(M) CONC
2590 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
2591 457933.80 3777108.90 0.04032 457943.80
3777108.90 0.04208
2592 457953.80 3777108.90 0.04407 457963.80
3777108.90 0.04631
2593 457973.80 3777108.90 0.04873 457983.80
3777108.90 0.05121
2594 457993.80 3777108.90 0.05378 458003.80
3777108.90 0.05631
2595 458013.80 3777108.90 0.05865 458023.80
3777108.90 0.06063
2596 458033.80 3777108.90 0.06207 458043.80
3777108.90 0.06286
2597 458053.80 3777108.90 0.06300 458063.80
3777108.90 0.06240
2598 458073.80 3777108.90 0.06110 458083.80
3777108.90 0.05911
2599 458093.80 3777108.90 0.05640 458103.80
3777108.90 0.05316
2600 458113.80 3777108.90 0.04951 458123.80
3777108.90 0.04559
2601 458133.80 3777108.90 0.04155 458143.80
3777108.90 0.03759
2602 458153.80 3777108.90 0.03385 458163.80
3777108.90 0.03044
2603 457753.80 3777118.90 0.01735 457763.80
3777118.90 0.01877
2604 457773.80 3777118.90 0.02028 457783.80
3777118.90 0.02183
2605 457793.80 3777118.90 0.02337 457803.80
3777118.90 0.02489
2606 457813.80 3777118.90 0.02636 457823.80
3777118.90 0.02775
2607 457833.80 3777118.90 0.02908 457843.80
3777118.90 0.03031
2608 457853.80 3777118.90 0.03151 457863.80 381
3777118.90 0.03269
2609 457873.80 3777118.90 0.03387 457883.80
3777118.90 0.03506
2610 457893.80 3777118.90 0.03631 457903.80
3777118.90 0.03763
2611 457913.80 3777118.90 0.03905 457923.80
3777118.90 0.04062
2612 457933.80 3777118.90 0.04236 457943.80
3777118.90 0.04425
2613 457953.80 3777118.90 0.04644 457963.80
3777118.90 0.04886
2614 457973.80 3777118.90 0.05154 457983.80
3777118.90 0.05448
2615 457993.80 3777118.90 0.05756 458003.80
3777118.90 0.06071
2616 458013.80 3777118.90 0.06370 458023.80
3777118.90 0.06637
2617 458033.80 3777118.90 0.06850 458043.80
3777118.90 0.06982
2618 458053.80 3777118.90 0.07034 458063.80
3777118.90 0.06997
2619 458073.80 3777118.90 0.06873 458083.80
3777118.90 0.06657
2620 458093.80 3777118.90 0.06358 458103.80
3777118.90 0.05996
2621 458113.80 3777118.90 0.05578 458123.80
3777118.90 0.05125
2622 458133.80 3777118.90 0.04659 458143.80
3777118.90 0.04189
2623 458153.80 3777118.90 0.03745 458163.80
3777118.90 0.03342
2624 457753.80 3777128.90 0.01753 457763.80
3777128.90 0.01910
2625 457773.80 3777128.90 0.02078 457783.80
3777128.90 0.02253
2626 457793.80 3777128.90 0.02431 457803.80
3777128.90 0.02607
2627 457813.80 3777128.90 0.02772 457823.80
3777128.90 0.02926
2628 457833.80 3777128.90 0.03069 457843.80
3777128.90 0.03202
2629 457853.80 3777128.90 0.03326 457863.80
3777128.90 0.03450
2630 457873.80 3777128.90 0.03574 457883.80
3777128.90 0.03701
2631 FF *** AERMOD - VERSION 22112 *** *** Fontana Square Emisions *** 01/11/23
2632 *** AERMET - VERSION 16216 ***
*** ***
18:41:23
2633
PAGE 22
2634 *** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV NODRYDPLT NOWETDPLT RURAL ADJ_U* 2635
2636 *** THE PERIOD ( 43848 HRS) AVERAGE CONCENTRATION VALUES FOR SOURCE GROUP: ALL ***
2637 INCLUDING SOURCE(S): E5FG71XG , E5FG71XH ,
2638
2639 *** DISCRETE CARTESIAN RECEPTOR POINTS ***
2640
2641 ** CONC OF EXHAUST IN
MICROGRAMS/M**3 **
2642
2643 X-COORD (M) Y-COORD (M) CONC X-COORD (M) Y-COORD
(M) CONC
2644 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 382 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
2645 457893.80 3777128.90 0.03836 457903.80
3777128.90 0.03973
2646 457913.80 3777128.90 0.04119 457923.80
3777128.90 0.04279
2647 457933.80 3777128.90 0.04454 457943.80
3777128.90 0.04650
2648 457953.80 3777128.90 0.04879 457963.80
3777128.90 0.05143
2649 457973.80 3777128.90 0.05451 457983.80
3777128.90 0.05798
2650 457993.80 3777128.90 0.06171 458003.80
3777128.90 0.06561
2651 458013.80 3777128.90 0.06943 458023.80
3777128.90 0.07293
2652 458033.80 3777128.90 0.07576 458043.80
3777128.90 0.07772
2653 458053.80 3777128.90 0.07877 458063.80
3777128.90 0.07875
2654 458073.80 3777128.90 0.07771 458083.80
3777128.90 0.07564
2655 458093.80 3777128.90 0.07244 458103.80
3777128.90 0.06839
2656 458113.80 3777128.90 0.06358 458123.80
3777128.90 0.05824
2657 458133.80 3777128.90 0.05259 458143.80
3777128.90 0.04697
2658 458153.80 3777128.90 0.04165 458163.80
3777128.90 0.03688
2659 457753.80 3777138.90 0.01767 457763.80
3777138.90 0.01943
2660 457773.80 3777138.90 0.02133 457783.80
3777138.90 0.02333
2661 457793.80 3777138.90 0.02538 457803.80
3777138.90 0.02737
2662 457813.80 3777138.90 0.02926 457823.80
3777138.90 0.03101
2663 457833.80 3777138.90 0.03261 457843.80
3777138.90 0.03410
2664 457853.80 3777138.90 0.03545 457863.80
3777138.90 0.03674
2665 457873.80 3777138.90 0.03803 457883.80
3777138.90 0.03935
2666 457893.80 3777138.90 0.04066 457903.80
3777138.90 0.04205
2667 457913.80 3777138.90 0.04355 457923.80
3777138.90 0.04519
2668 457933.80 3777138.90 0.04704 457943.80
3777138.90 0.04907
2669 457953.80 3777138.90 0.05145 457963.80
3777138.90 0.05428
2670 457973.80 3777138.90 0.05765 457983.80
3777138.90 0.06155
2671 457993.80 3777138.90 0.06595 458003.80
3777138.90 0.07075
2672 458013.80 3777138.90 0.07561 458023.80
3777138.90 0.08025
2673 458033.80 3777138.90 0.08426 458043.80
3777138.90 0.08717
2674 458053.80 3777138.90 0.08893 458063.80
3777138.90 0.08942
2675 458073.80 3777138.90 0.08860 458083.80
3777138.90 0.08642
2676 458093.80 3777138.90 0.08305 458103.80
3777138.90 0.07855
2677 458113.80 3777138.90 0.07304 458123.80 383
3777138.90 0.06681
2678 458133.80 3777138.90 0.06018 458143.80
3777138.90 0.05333
2679 458153.80 3777138.90 0.04685 457753.80
3777148.90 0.01773
2680 457763.80 3777148.90 0.01965 457773.80
3777148.90 0.02178
2681 457783.80 3777148.90 0.02410 457793.80
3777148.90 0.02650
2682 457803.80 3777148.90 0.02889 457813.80
3777148.90 0.03115
2683 457823.80 3777148.90 0.03314 457833.80
3777148.90 0.03494
2684 457843.80 3777148.90 0.03653 457853.80
3777148.90 0.03796
2685 FF *** AERMOD - VERSION 22112 *** *** Fontana Square Emisions *** 01/11/23
2686 *** AERMET - VERSION 16216 ***
*** ***
18:41:23
2687
PAGE 23
2688 *** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV NODRYDPLT NOWETDPLT RURAL ADJ_U* 2689
2690 *** THE PERIOD ( 43848 HRS) AVERAGE CONCENTRATION VALUES FOR SOURCE GROUP: ALL ***
2691 INCLUDING SOURCE(S): E5FG71XG , E5FG71XH ,
2692
2693 *** DISCRETE CARTESIAN RECEPTOR POINTS ***
2694
2695 ** CONC OF EXHAUST IN
MICROGRAMS/M**3 **
2696
2697 X-COORD (M) Y-COORD (M) CONC X-COORD (M) Y-COORD
(M) CONC
2698 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
2699 457863.80 3777148.90 0.03932 457873.80
3777148.90 0.04065
2700 457883.80 3777148.90 0.04208 457893.80
3777148.90 0.04351
2701 457903.80 3777148.90 0.04491 457913.80
3777148.90 0.04642
2702 457923.80 3777148.90 0.04805 457933.80
3777148.90 0.04985
2703 457943.80 3777148.90 0.05187 457953.80
3777148.90 0.05425
2704 457963.80 3777148.90 0.05719 457973.80
3777148.90 0.06084
2705 457983.80 3777148.90 0.06531 457993.80
3777148.90 0.07052
2706 458003.80 3777148.90 0.07640 458013.80
3777148.90 0.08260
2707 458023.80 3777148.90 0.08863 458033.80
3777148.90 0.09389
2708 458043.80 3777148.90 0.09803 458053.80
3777148.90 0.10068
2709 458063.80 3777148.90 0.10189 458073.80
3777148.90 0.10151
2710 458083.80 3777148.90 0.09966 458093.80
3777148.90 0.09640
2711 458103.80 3777148.90 0.09146 458113.80
3777148.90 0.08517
2712 458123.80 3777148.90 0.07777 458133.80
3777148.90 0.06955
2713 458143.80 3777148.90 0.06108 458153.80 384
3777148.90 0.05309
2714 457753.80 3777158.90 0.01765 457763.80
3777158.90 0.01978
2715 457773.80 3777158.90 0.02222 457783.80
3777158.90 0.02493
2716 457793.80 3777158.90 0.02781 457803.80
3777158.90 0.03070
2717 457813.80 3777158.90 0.03339 457823.80
3777158.90 0.03573
2718 457833.80 3777158.90 0.03774 457843.80
3777158.90 0.03951
2719 457853.80 3777158.90 0.04111 457863.80
3777158.90 0.04263
2720 457873.80 3777158.90 0.04402 457883.80
3777158.90 0.04547
2721 457893.80 3777158.90 0.04691 457903.80
3777158.90 0.04836
2722 457913.80 3777158.90 0.04988 457923.80
3777158.90 0.05150
2723 457933.80 3777158.90 0.05330 457943.80
3777158.90 0.05532
2724 457953.80 3777158.90 0.05760 457963.80
3777158.90 0.06053
2725 457973.80 3777158.90 0.06424 457983.80
3777158.90 0.06901
2726 457993.80 3777158.90 0.07502 458003.80
3777158.90 0.08210
2727 458013.80 3777158.90 0.08995 458023.80
3777158.90 0.09786
2728 458033.80 3777158.90 0.10519 458043.80
3777158.90 0.11121
2729 458053.80 3777158.90 0.11531 458063.80
3777158.90 0.11756
2730 458073.80 3777158.90 0.11786 458083.80
3777158.90 0.11635
2731 458093.80 3777158.90 0.11273 458103.80
3777158.90 0.10742
2732 458113.80 3777158.90 0.10033 458123.80
3777158.90 0.09173
2733 458133.80 3777158.90 0.08191 457753.80
3777168.90 0.01747
2734 457763.80 3777168.90 0.01975 457773.80
3777168.90 0.02247
2735 457783.80 3777168.90 0.02563 457793.80
3777168.90 0.02916
2736 457803.80 3777168.90 0.03277 457813.80
3777168.90 0.03616
2737 457823.80 3777168.90 0.03909 457833.80
3777168.90 0.04141
2738 457843.80 3777168.90 0.04343 457853.80
3777168.90 0.04515
2739 FF *** AERMOD - VERSION 22112 *** *** Fontana Square Emisions *** 01/11/23
2740 *** AERMET - VERSION 16216 ***
*** ***
18:41:23
2741
PAGE 24
2742 *** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV NODRYDPLT NOWETDPLT RURAL ADJ_U* 2743
2744 *** THE PERIOD ( 43848 HRS) AVERAGE CONCENTRATION VALUES FOR SOURCE GROUP: ALL ***
2745 INCLUDING SOURCE(S): E5FG71XG , E5FG71XH ,
2746
2747 *** DISCRETE CARTESIAN RECEPTOR POINTS ***
2748 385
2749 ** CONC OF EXHAUST IN
MICROGRAMS/M**3 **
2750
2751 X-COORD (M) Y-COORD (M) CONC X-COORD (M) Y-COORD
(M) CONC
2752 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
2753 457863.80 3777168.90 0.04668 457873.80
3777168.90 0.04817
2754 457883.80 3777168.90 0.04964 457893.80
3777168.90 0.05125
2755 457903.80 3777168.90 0.05290 457913.80
3777168.90 0.05446
2756 457923.80 3777168.90 0.05608 457933.80
3777168.90 0.05780
2757 457943.80 3777168.90 0.05960 457953.80
3777168.90 0.06161
2758 457963.80 3777168.90 0.06422 457973.80
3777168.90 0.06776
2759 457983.80 3777168.90 0.07281 457993.80
3777168.90 0.07970
2760 458003.80 3777168.90 0.08827 458013.80
3777168.90 0.09824
2761 458023.80 3777168.90 0.10872 458033.80
3777168.90 0.11865
2762 458043.80 3777168.90 0.12681 458053.80
3777168.90 0.13275
2763 458063.80 3777168.90 0.13644 458073.80
3777168.90 0.13786
2764 458083.80 3777168.90 0.13709 458093.80
3777168.90 0.13376
2765 457753.80 3777178.90 0.01706 457763.80
3777178.90 0.01946
2766 457773.80 3777178.90 0.02246 457783.80
3777178.90 0.02618
2767 457793.80 3777178.90 0.03059 457803.80
3777178.90 0.03526
2768 457813.80 3777178.90 0.03963 457823.80
3777178.90 0.04324
2769 457833.80 3777178.90 0.04599 457843.80
3777178.90 0.04820
2770 457853.80 3777178.90 0.05015 457863.80
3777178.90 0.05195
2771 457873.80 3777178.90 0.05375 457883.80
3777178.90 0.05536
2772 457893.80 3777178.90 0.05696 457903.80
3777178.90 0.05860
2773 457913.80 3777178.90 0.06028 457923.80
3777178.90 0.06198
2774 457933.80 3777178.90 0.06371 457943.80
3777178.90 0.06547
2775 457953.80 3777178.90 0.06715 457963.80
3777178.90 0.06918
2776 457973.80 3777178.90 0.07211 457983.80
3777178.90 0.07687
2777 457993.80 3777178.90 0.08415 458003.80
3777178.90 0.09415
2778 458013.80 3777178.90 0.10662 458023.80
3777178.90 0.12057
2779 458033.80 3777178.90 0.13429 458043.80
3777178.90 0.14604
2780 458053.80 3777178.90

0.15445
2781 FF *** AERMOD - VERSION 22112 *** *** Fontana Square Emisions *** 01/11/23 386
2782 *** AERMET - VERSION 16216 ***
*** ***
18:41:23
2783
PAGE 25
2784 *** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV NODRYDPLT NOWETDPLT RURAL ADJ_U* 2785
2786 *** THE SUMMARY OF MAXIMUM PERIOD ( 43848 HRS)
RESULTS ***
2787
2788
2789 ** CONC OF EXHAUST IN
MICROGRAMS/M**3 **
2790
2791

NETWORK
2792 GROUP ID AVERAGE CONC RECEPTOR (XR, YR, ZELEV,

ZHILL, ZFLAG) OF TYPE GRID-ID
2793 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
2794
2795 ALL 1ST HIGHEST VALUE IS 0.15445 AT ( 458053.80, 3777178.90, 456.58, 1732.50, 0.00) DC
2796 2ND HIGHEST VALUE IS 0.14604 AT ( 458043.80, 3777178.90, 456.55, 1732.50, 0.00) DC
2797 3RD HIGHEST VALUE IS 0.13786 AT ( 458073.80, 3777168.90, 456.46, 1732.50, 0.00) DC
2798 4TH HIGHEST VALUE IS 0.13709 AT ( 458083.80, 3777168.90, 456.55, 1732.50, 0.00) DC
2799 5TH HIGHEST VALUE IS 0.13644 AT ( 458063.80, 3777168.90, 456.38, 1732.50, 0.00) DC
2800 6TH HIGHEST VALUE IS 0.13429 AT ( 458033.80, 3777178.90, 456.46, 1732.50, 0.00) DC
2801 7TH HIGHEST VALUE IS 0.13376 AT ( 458093.80, 3777168.90, 456.58, 1732.50, 0.00) DC
2802 8TH HIGHEST VALUE IS 0.13275 AT ( 458053.80, 3777168.90, 456.31, 1732.50, 0.00) DC
2803 9TH HIGHEST VALUE IS 0.12681 AT ( 458043.80, 3777168.90, 456.27, 1732.50, 0.00) DC
2804 10TH HIGHEST VALUE IS 0.12057 AT ( 458023.80, 3777178.90, 456.38, 1732.50, 0.00) DC
2805
2806
2807 *** RECEPTOR TYPES: GC = GRIDCART
2808 GP = GRIDPOLR
2809 DC = DISCCART
2810 DP = DISCPOLR
2811 FF *** AERMOD - VERSION 22112 *** *** Fontana Square Emisions *** 01/11/23
2812 *** AERMET - VERSION 16216 ***
*** ***
18:41:23
2813
PAGE 26
2814 *** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV NODRYDPLT NOWETDPLT RURAL ADJ_U* 2815
2816 *** Message Summary : AERMOD Model Execution ***
2817
2818 --------- Summary of Total Messages --------
2819
2820 A Total of 0 Fatal Error Message(s)
2821 A Total of 8 Warning Message(s)
2822 A Total of 838 Informational Message(s)
2823
2824 A Total of 43848 Hours Were Processed
2825 387
2826 A Total of 40 Calm Hours Identified
2827
2828 A Total of 798 Missing Hours Identified ( 1.82 Percent) 2829
2830
2831 ******** FATAL ERROR MESSAGES ********
2832 *** NONE ***
2833
2834
2835 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
2836 ME W186 1589 MEOPEN: THRESH_1MIN 1-min ASOS wind speed threshold used 0.50
2837 ME W187 1589 MEOPEN: ADJ_U* Option for Stable Low Winds used in AERMET
2838 OU W565 1593 PERPLT: Possible Conflict With Dynamically Allocated FUNIT

PLOTFILE
2839 MX W438 8800 METQA: Convective Velocity Data Out-of-Range. KURDAT = 12010216
2840 MX W438 11536 METQA: Convective Velocity Data Out-of-Range. KURDAT = 12042516
2841 MX W420 16779 METQA: Wind Speed Out-of-Range. KURDAT = 12113003
2842 MX W450 26305 CHKDAT: Record Out of Sequence in Meteorological File at:
15010101
2843 MX W450 26305 CHKDAT: Record Out of Sequence in Meteorological File at: 1 year gap
2844
2845 ************************************
2846 *** AERMOD Finishes Successfully ***
2847 ************************************
2848
2849
388

ATTACHMENT B
389
WI #23-002.02
16 January 2023
Kevin T. Carmichael, Esq.

Adams Broadwell Joseph & Cardozo
520 Capitol Mall, Suite 350
Sacramento, California 95814
Subject: Fontana Square Project
Fontana, California
Review and Comment on IS/MND Noise Analysis
Dear Mr. Carmichael,
As requested, we have reviewed the information and noise impact analysis in the following documents:

Fontana Square Project, Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (“IS/MND”) Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., MC No. 20-083
December 2022
Acoustical Assessment, Fontana Square Project (“Acoustical Assessment”) Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

December 2021
Memorandum: Fontana Square Project – Noise Consistency Analysis (“Noise Memo”) Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

August 23, 2022
This letter reports our comments on the noise analysis in the subject documents. The Noise Memo states that recent changes to the project, including expanding the Banquet Hall, “would not result in impacts beyond those identified in the Original IS/MND”. [Noise Memo at p. 3] The Acoustical Assessment is the basis for the Noise analysis presented in the IS/MND.

Wilson Ihrig, Acoustical Consultants, has practiced exclusively in the field of acoustics since 1966.

During our 57 years of operation, we have prepared hundreds of noise studies for Environmental Impact Reports and Statements. We have one of the largest technical laboratories in the acoustical consulting industry. We also utilize industry-standard acoustical programs such as Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM), SoundPLAN, and CADNA. In short, we are well qualified to prepare environmental noise studies and review studies prepared by others. 390
Fontana Square Project, Fontana, Calif.

Review of IS/MND Noise Analysis
2 Adverse Effects of Noise1
Although the health effects of noise are not taken as seriously in the United States as they are in other countries, they are real and, in many parts of the country, pervasive.

Noise-Induced Hearing Loss. If a person is repeatedly exposed to loud noises, he or she may experience noise-induced hearing impairment or loss. In the United States, both the Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA) and the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) promote standards and regulations to protect the hearing of people exposed to high levels of industrial noise.

Speech Interference. Another common problem associated with noise is speech interference. In addition to the obvious issues that may arise from misunderstandings, speech interference also leads to problems with concentration fatigue, irritation, decreased working capacity, and automatic stress reactions. For complete speech intelligibility, the sound level of the speech should be 15 to 18 dBA higher than the background noise. Typical indoor speech levels are 45 to 50 dBA at 1 meter, so any noise above 30 dBA begins to interfere with speech intelligibility. The common reaction to higher background noise levels is to raise one’s voice. If this is required persistently for long periods of time, stress reactions and irritation will likely result.

Sleep Disturbance. Noise can disturb sleep by making it more difficult to fall asleep, by waking someone after they are asleep, or by altering their sleep stage, e.g., reducing the amount of rapid eye movement (REM) sleep. Noise exposure for people who are sleeping has also been linked to increased blood pressure, increased heart rate, increase in body movements, and other physiological effects. Not surprisingly, people whose sleep is disturbed by noise often experience secondary effects such as increased fatigue, depressed mood, and decreased work performance.

Cardiovascular and Physiological Effects. Human’s bodily reactions to noise are rooted in the “fight or flight” response that evolved when many noises signaled imminent danger. These include increased blood pressure, elevated heart rate, and vasoconstriction. Prolonged exposure to acute noises can result in permanent effects such as hypertension and heart disease.

Impaired Cognitive Performance. Studies have established that noise exposure impairs people’s abilities to perform complex tasks (tasks that require attention to detail or analytical processes) and it makes reading, paying attention, solving problems, and memorizing more difficult. This is why there are standards for classroom background noise levels and why offices and libraries are designed to provide quiet work environments.
1 More information on these and other adverse effects of noise may be found in Guidelines for Community Noise, eds B Berglund, T Lindvall, and D Schwela, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 1999. (https://www.who.int/docstore/peh/noise/Comnoise-1.pdf) 391
Fontana Square Project, Fontana, Calif.

Review of IS/MND Noise Analysis
3 Comments on Construction Noise Analysis
IS/MND Failed to Identify All Noise-Sensitive Receptors The IS/MND states,
Sensitive land uses near the Project include single-family residential homes, approximately 105 feet to the south on the opposite side of S. Highland Avenue, single-family residential homes approximately 270 feet to the west on Highland Avenue, and a school, A.B. Miller High School, located approximately 1,600 feet to the southeast of the Project. [IS/MND at p. 151] While that is all correct, there is also a residence above the Sunrise Market at 15911 Highland Avenue that the IS/MND and Acoustical Assessment failed to identify:

Figure 1 Residence at 15911 Highland Avenue
Ref: https://www.loopnet.com/Listing/15911-Highland-Ave-Fontana-CA/17451352/ 392
Fontana Square Project, Fontana, Calif.

Review of IS/MND Noise Analysis
4 Figure 2 Proximity of 15911 Highland to Banquet Hall
Had this noise-sensitive residence been analyzed in the same manner as the other residences, it would have been found to be significantly impacted by construction noise. The analysis follows.

Construction Noise Analysis for 15911 Highland Avenue
Regarding the IS/MND construction noise analysis, the document states:

FHWA’s Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM) was used to estimate construction noise at nearby sensitive receptors. For modeling purposes, construction equipment has been distributed evenly between the center of the construction site and the nearest receptor. To be conservative, the loudest and most used equipment was placed nearest the sensitive receptor. [IS/MND at p. 154]
The details of the IS/MND construction noise calculations are provided in Appendix B of the Acoustical Assessment. For our analysis, we first replicated the calculations in the IS/MND. We then made computations for construction of the Banquet Hall which is, in effect, one of four separate Banquet Hall
15911
Highland
39 ft
103 ft
393
Fontana Square Project, Fontana, Calif.

Review of IS/MND Noise Analysis
5 projects that composes the large development. We used the distances shown in Figure 2 for these calculations: 39 ft from the near side of the Banquet Hall to the apartment, and 103 ft from the centerline of the Banquet Hall to the apartment. We then distributed the equipment equally between these two distances with the loudest equipment closest to the apartment, again, following the methodology of the IS/MND. Having done that, we prepared a table similar to IS/MND Table 22 for the residence at 15911 Highland, presented below as Table 1.

Table 1: Project Construction Noise Levels at 15911 Highland Avenue Construction Phase
Modeled Exterior
Construction Noise Level
(dBA Leq)
Noise Threshold
(dBA Leq)
Exceed Threshold?
Demolition 85.3 80 Yes
Site Preparation 82.5 80 Yes
Grading 84.9 80 Yes
Building Construction/
Paving/Architectural Coating 84.4 80 Yes
Note: Equipment distributed evenly between the center of the construction site and the nearest sensitive receptor.

Source: Federal Highway Administration, Roadway Construction Noise Model, 2006.

As can be seen in Table 1 herein, had the IS/MND noise analysis accounted for the residence at 15911 Highland Avenue, it would have revealed that construction noise will exceed the FTA’s threshold of 80 dBA (8-hour Leq) for residential uses, the standard adopted in the IS/MND:
. . . this analysis conservatively uses the FTA’s threshold of 80 dBA (8-hour Leq) for residential uses and 85 dBA (8-hour Leq) for non-residential uses to evaluate construction noise impacts. [IS/MND at p. 156]
The details of our calculations are appended to this letter Conclusion
The IS/MND noise analysis for the Fontana Square Project did not include all noise-sensitive receptors. It missed an apartment at 15911 Highland Avenue that shares a common property line with the project site. Using the construction noise methodology and threshold of significance established in the IS/MND and its associated Acoustical Assessment document, we have shown that construction noise will cause a significant noise impact at this residence. ⧫ ⧫ ⧫ ⧫ ⧫
394
Fontana Square Project, Fontana, Calif.

Review of IS/MND Noise Analysis
6 Please contact me if you have any question about this review of the noise analysis in the Fontana Square Project IS/MND noise analysis.

Very truly yours,

WILSON IHRIG
Derek L. Watry
Principal
2023-01-16 - fontana square - comments on is-mnd - noise.docx 395
Fontana Square Project, Fontana, Calif.

Review of IS/MND Noise Analysis
7 FHWA Roadway Construction Noise Model Calculations
Demolition
Equipment Lmax Util% No. Distance Lmax Leq
Concrete Saw 89.6 20% 1 39 ft 91.8 84.8
Dozer 81.7 40% 1 71 ft 78.7 74.7
Excavator 80.7 40% 1 103 ft 74.4 70.4
Total 91.8 85.3
Site Prep
Equipment Lmax Util% No. Distance Lmax Leq
Tractor 84.0 40% 1 39 ft 86.2 82.2
Dozer 81.7 40% 1 103 ft 75.4 71.4
Total 86.2 82.5
Grading
Equipment Lmax Util% No. Distance Lmax Leq
Grader 85.0 40% 1 39 ft 87.2 83.2
Tractor 84.0 40% 1 60 ft 82.4 78.4
Dozer 81.7 40% 1 82 ft 77.4 73.5
Excavator 80.7 40% 1 103 ft 74.4 70.4
Total 87.2 84.9
Bldg/Paving/Painting
Equipment Lmax Util% No. Distance Lmax Leq
Tractor 84.0 40% 1 39 ft 86.2 82.2
Generator 81.0 50% 1 50 ft 81.1 78.0
Paver 77.0 50% 1 60 ft 75.4 72.4
Compressor (air) 78.0 40% 1 71 ft 75.0 71.0
Crane 81.0 16% 1 82 ft 76.7 68.8
Roller 80.0 20% 1 92 ft 74.7 67.7
Welder / Torch 73.0 40% 1 103 ft 66.7 62.7
Total 86.2 84.4
RCNM Ref Values @ 50 ft Noise Level @ Receptor
RCNM Ref Values @ 50 ft Noise Level @ Receptor
RCNM Ref Values @ 50 ft Noise Level @ Receptor
RCNM Ref Values @ 50 ft Noise Level @ Receptor
396
Wilson Ihrig Resume – Derek Watry – Page 1
DEREK L. WATRY
Principal
Since joining Wilson Ihrig in 1992, Derek has gained experienced in many areas of practice including environmental, construction, forensic, architectural, and industrial. For all of these, he has conducted extensive field measurements, established acceptability criteria, and calculated future noise and vibration levels. In the many of these areas, he has prepared CEQA and NEPA noise technical studies and EIR/EIS sections. Derek has a thorough understanding of the technical, public relations, and political aspects of environmental noise and vibration compliance work. He has helped resolve complex community noise issues, and he has also served as an expert witness in numerous legal matters.

Education
• M.S. Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Berkeley • B.S. Mechanical Engineering, University of California, San Diego • M.B.A. Saint Mary’s College of California
Project Experience
12th Street Reconstruction, Oakland, CA
Responsible for construction noise control plan from pile driving after City received complaints from nearby neighbors. Attendance required at community meetings. 525 Golden Gate Avenue Demolition, San Francisco, CA
Noise and vibration monitoring and consultation during demolition of a multi-story office building next to Federal, State, and Municipal Court buildings for the SFDPW. 911 Emergency Communications Center, San Francisco, CA
Technical assistance on issues relating to the demolition and construction work including vibration monitoring, developing specification and reviewing/recommending appropriate methods and equipment for demolition of Old Emergency Center for the SFDPW.

Central Contra Costa Sanitary District, Grayson Creek Sewer, Pleasant Hill, CA Evaluation of vibration levels due to construction of new sewer line in hard soil.

City of Atascadero, Review of Walmart EIR Noise Analysis, Atascadero, CA Review and Critique of EIR Noise Analysis for the Del Rio Road Commercial Area Specific Plan.

City of Fremont, Ongoing Environmental Services On-Call Contract, Fremont, CA Work tasks primarily focus on noise insulation and vibration control design compliance for new residential projects and peer review other consultant’s projects.

City of Fremont, Patterson Ranch EIR, Fremont, CA
Conducted noise and vibration portion of the EIR.

City of King City, Silva Ranch Annexation EIR, King City, CA Conducted the noise portion of the EIR and assessed the suitability of the project areas for the intended development. Work included a reconnaissance of existing noise sources and receptors in and around the project areas, and long-term noise measurements at key locations. 397
Wilson Ihrig Resume – Derek Watry – Page 2
Conoco Phillips Community Study and Expert Witness, Rodeo, CA Investigated low frequency noise from exhaust stacks and provided expert witness services representing Conoco Phillips. Evaluated effectiveness of noise controls implemented by the refinery.

Golden Gate Park Concourse Underground Garage, San Francisco, CA Noise and vibration testing during underground garage construction to monitor for residences and an old sandstone statue during pile driving for the City of San Francisco.

Laguna Honda Hospital, Clarendon Hall Demolition, San Francisco, CA Project manager for performed vibration monitoring during demolition of an older wing of the Laguna Honda Hospital.

Loch Lomond Marina EIR, San Rafael, CA
Examined traffic noise impacts on existing residences for the City of San Rafael. Provided the project with acoustical analyses and reports to satisfy the requirements of Title 24.

Mare Island Dredge and Material Disposal, Vallejo, CA
EIR/EIS analysis of noise from planned dredged material off-loading operations for the City of Vallejo.

Napa Creek Vibration Monitoring Review, CA
Initially brought in to peer review construction vibration services provided by another firm, but eventually was tapped for its expertise to develop a vibration monitoring plan for construction activities near historic buildings and long-term construction vibration monitoring.

San Francisco DPW, Environmental Services On-Call, CA
Noise and vibration monitoring for such tasks as: Northshore Main Improvement project, and design noise mitigation for SOMA West Skate Park.

San Francisco PUC, Islais Creek Clean Water Program, San Francisco, CA Community noise and vibration monitoring during construction, including several stages of pile driving. Coordination of noise and ground vibration measurements during pile driving and other construction activity to determine compliance with noise ordinance. Coordination with Department of Public Works to provide a vibration seminar for inspectors and interaction with Construction Management team and nearby businesses to resolve noise and vibration issues.

San Francisco PUC, Richmond Transport Tunnel Clean Water Program, San Francisco, CA Environmental compliance monitoring of vibration during soft tunnel mining and boring, cut-andcover trenching for sewer lines, hard rock tunnel blasting and site remediation. Work involved long-term monitoring of general construction activity, special investigations of groundborne vibration from pumps and bus generated ground vibration, and interaction with the public (homeowners).

Santa Clara VTA, Capitol Expressway Light Rail (CELR) Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Update EIS, CA Reviewed previous BRT analysis and provide memo to support EIS. 398
Wilson Ihrig Resume – Derek Watry – Page 3
Shell Oil Refinery, Martinez, CA
Identified source of community noise complaints from tonal noise due to refinery equipment and operations. Developed noise control recommendations. Conducted round-the-clock noise measurements at nearby residence and near to the property line of the refinery and correlated results. Conducted an exhaustive noise survey of the noisier pieces of equipment throughout the refinery to identify and characterize the dominant noise sources that were located anywhere from a quarter to three-quarters of a mile away. Provided a list of actions to mitigate noise from the noisiest pieces of refinery equipment. Assisted the refinery in the selection of long-term noise monitoring equipment to be situated on the refinery grounds so that a record of the current noise environment will be documented, and future noise complaints can be addressed more efficiently.

Tyco Electronics Corporation, Annual Noise Compliance Study, Menlo Park, CA Conducted annual noise compliance monitoring. Provided letter critiquing the regulatory requirements and recommending improvements.

University of California, San Francisco Mission Bay Campus Vibration Study, CA Conducted measurements and analysis of ground vibration across site due to heavy traffic on Third Street. Analysis included assessment of pavement surface condition and propensity of local soil structure.
399

ATTACHMENT C
400
12-hour In-N-Out barricade ends when police dog finds burglary suspect... https://www.pasadenastarnews.com/2018/12/10/burglary-suspect-barrica... 1 of 4 9/10/2019, 7:28 AM
401
12-hour In-N-Out barricade ends when police dog finds burglary suspect... https://www.pasadenastarnews.com/2018/12/10/burglary-suspect-barrica... 2 of 4 9/10/2019, 7:28 AM
402
Man slain after dispute in Lodi In-N-Out Burger lot - News - recordnet.c... https://www.recordnet.com/news/20180819/man-slain-after-dispute-in-lo... 1 of 2 9/10/2019, 7:19 AM
403
Man slain after dispute in Lodi In-N-Out Burger lot - News - recordnet.c... https://www.recordnet.com/news/20180819/man-slain-after-dispute-in-lo... 2 of 2 9/10/2019, 7:19 AM
404
→
Man killed following dispute in Lodi In-N-Out Burger parking lot, police... https://www.sacbee.com/news/local/crime/article216983830.html 2 of 4 9/10/2019, 7:00 AM
405

























!

"#



$




!"% &

&#'(
"












)

 !

"#

'


*+,-
./01
1/23+*/
4 5
678 %
9 #!
(:



%('
"
4 5 ;8 %
9 #!
(:



%('
"








;


:
9 #!
(:
:

<

!










!












)




6!



=




"#

!

&
>?

6



@

5A6
B








;



<












!



"#

!




















&
./01C*2+D/
E
FGHI+*
1JK/,-
IJFL

MNNOPQP
RMS

MTTOUOVTW
QNWXSU
QY
NYZ
+S[.[\]Q
H]NUON
XS
3MS
.]WP
^XQ_
NO`TXaM
U]S
406

























!

"#



$




!"% &

&#'(
"












)

 !

"#

'
*+,-
./0
1+-20345.,+-

66#






!






7!



8 







)





%9(

&& :!









;


66#





!

"
#

6



#!
6
!




&
<













&

=




"

&
>







#


?@A?1BCAD

!
6


E &
?,F-
GH
I+3
+G3
A305J,-F
K0L4
0M5,N4
.+
F0.
./0
-0L4
I54.O
1,.P
K0L4
?032,Q0
?RSK?SBDT
1SKUDKU
V,I0W4
T53J
?0Q30.

DXH+40Y
Z0534
[I.03
\03
R544,-F


]"




^

)
!


#




6
_
#
;

#)





6

)

_
#



)


!




&
:
%
U+H
?.+3,04
`[TK
407



















!


"


#


$%&&&'!(' !







! 









!)

&




!



*+,,
-./
0+12342,
/,53 6789:;9
<=
>7?:@
>7
AB:C8
D7CBE
6F
G?H;:9I78
J0KL

MNOMPQR
STU
VWSXU
TYZS
[\
QO
]^_
`aabcde
fg
`cc^bhij_k
lmdaj^h
nddec
obcipqdr
`i
s_tntfbi
upr
npi
v]pwj_k
xbjayhz
{_pbk|}
~€‚ƒ
„

ƒ†‡ˆ„†‡ƒ‰Š
‹Œ€‰„Œ
‰ƒ€ƒŒ†ƒŽ
Žƒ

‡ƒ
†‘†’ƒ‚‡
Œ„Ž
Œ‰ƒ
Œ†“„”
‡ƒ
’‘•€‚
‰
ƒ€’
„
Žƒ„–—„”
ˆ˜

P™
š›œ
žŸ œ
orjqd
¡jqd
¢£›¤¥
¦Ÿ›£§¨¨¢§ž¥¦§¤§©Ÿ›ž¥
¨¦œª¤¨«œ¨«œš
¬§Ÿ §¨¨ ¦›¤
£§ª›
¦Ÿ›£§¨
408



















!


"


#


$%&&&'!(' !







! 









!)

&




!



*+*,-./
012123+/
456789
7:
;9<=>7:<=9?@
AB67C5?:7B
B?9
B<D7:E
=F9
GHI678
C5?
F96G
7J9:KCL7:E
B
>B:

MF5
B669E9J6L
B<<BH6=9J
B
<G987B6N:99J<
>B:

B=
B:

O:NPNQH=
C5?
:5=
>5R7:E
SH78D6L
9:5HEF
BT9?
G6B87:E
F7<
5?J9?U
A966
GF5:9
R7J95
=FB=
MB<
=BD9:

BT9?
=F9
B669E9J
B<<BH6=
MB<
G5<=9J
IL
G56789
5:

VB89I55D
5:
;9J:9<JBLU
W4BL
865<9
BX9:K5:
=5
=F9
<H<G98=@
F7<
865=F7:E
B:J
<F59<@
B:J
F7<
R5789@Y
G56789
M?5=9U
ZF9
867G
<F5M<
=F9
F9B=9J
BT9?>B=F
5C
=F9
B669E9J
B<<BH6=
B:J
=F9
R78K>
B<D7:E
=F9
>B:
5H=<7J9
=F9
O:NPNQH=
?9<=BH?B:=@
W;FL
J7J
L5H
8B66
>9
?9=B?J9J[
\5H
F7=
>9]Y
^=
5:9
G57:=
7:
=F9
R7J95
=F9
<H<G98=
?9<G5:J<@
W_98BH<9
L5H
B?9
B
CNND7:E
?9=B?JUY
ZF9
<H<G98=
=F9:

BGG9B?<
=5
D:58D
B
GF5:9
5H=
5C
=F9
R78K>`<
FB:J@
B66
MF769
5=F9?
G95G69
8B:

I9
<99:

B:J
F9B?J
=?L7:E
=5
J9CH<9
=F9
8FB5<U
aZF9
R78K>@
B
<G987B6
:99J<
>B:@
MB<
GH:8F9J
<9R9?B6
K>9<
I98BH<9
F9
MB<
:5=
>5R7:E
SH78D6L
9:5HEF
BT9?
G6B87:E
F7<
5?J9?@bb
B
<=B=9>9:=
C?5>
G56789
?9BJU
a^XB8D7:E
RH6:9?BI69
>9>I9?<
5C
5H?
85>>H:7=L
7<
:5=
5:6L
85MB?J6L@
IH=
7=
7<
J9<G78BI69UY
cdefg
hefg
ijklmn
oplkqrrjiqsnoqmqtplsn
rojuvjmrwurwux
yqpzqrrzoljm
kqvlj
oplkqr
409



















!


"


#


$%&&&'!(' !







! 









!)

&




!


*
+,-
./.0-12

3. 4-.1536-4

7. 7
8,32-
97:-
3;
,3.
<=.
8,>
.27;4.
?
@--2
27::
832,
65>8; ,735A
B-

87. :7.2
.--;
8-753;C
7 8,32-
+D.,352E
475FD1>:>5-4
.,>52.
7;4
6:71F
.,>-.A
G>:31-
/5C-
7;H>;-
832,
3;@>597I>;
2>
17::

J>997;4-5
K;7/-5,7L-
>@
2,-
M-.293;.2-5
G>:31-
N-07529-;2
72 OP<DQ<RDSOTPA
U>/
17;
5-973;
7;>;H9>/.A
VWXYZ
[XYZ
\]^_`a
bc_^dee]\dfabd`dgc_fa
eb]hi]`ejhejhk
ldcmdeemb_]`
^di_]
bc_^de
410
https://mv-voice.com/news/print/2017/10/20/city-sees-spike-in-auto-burglaries Uploaded: Fri, Oct 20, 2017, 11:42 am
City sees spike in auto burglaries
Thieves target theaters, commercial areas and one burger joint, in particular by Kevin Forestieri
Nearly one in four auto burglaries reported in Mountain View this year occurred in a small, triangle-shaped In-N-Out Burger parking lot off of North Rengstorff Avenue, according to data from the Mountain View Police Department.

The lot with roughly 70 parking spaces just south of Highway 101 has taken the unenviable title of most burglarized area of the city for years, but reported thefts outside the fast-food restaurant have skyrocketed in 2017. Of the 446 reported car burglaries in Mountain View so far this year, 101 occurred in the In-N-Out parking lot. Police say the close proximity to the highway gives thieves easy access in and out of the parking lot, making it easy to hit multiple vehicles and flee within seconds.

Reported auto burglaries in Mountain View are already up 25 percent this year compared to 2016, and it's only mid-October. Police received 446 reports of car burglaries, according to the crime-tracking website CrimeReports, up from 342 in 2016. There's also a three-year trend showing that thefts from vehicles are occurring in increasingly concentrated pockets of the city rather than widely interspersed throughout Mountain View.

In 2015, there were 475 reported car burglaries in Mountain View -- comparable to this year -- but only 26 thefts at the In-N-Out Burger parking lot. During a precipitous drop in property crime in 2016, thefts in the parking lot bucked the trend and actually doubled.

Other bustling areas in the city fell victim to a similar trend. Reported thefts in the Century Cinema 16 parking lots on North Shoreline Boulevard rose from seven cases in 2015 to 20 cases in 2016, increasing again to 30 cases so far this year. Commercial centers and major thoroughfares including El Camino Real (52), the San Antonio Shopping Center (31) and the downtown area (35) have also been prime targets for car burglaries.

The Mountain View Police Department is actively investigating the city's widespread auto burglary cases, according to police spokeswoman Katie Nelson, and is working with other agencies in the Bay Area to address the problem on a regional level. While Nelson said she couldn't go into detail about the department's Crime Suppression Unit and what they are doing to prevent the thefts, she said there's definitely a concerted effort to address the problem.
"Our department is working around the clock literally to address this, which includes enforcement and serious investigative legwork," she said.

Nelson said that the problem is not exclusive to Mountain View, and that other neighboring cities are dealing with a similar increase in car break-ins. As of Tuesday, CrimeReports shows that Palo Alto's auto burglaries were up to 668 cases so far in 2017, compared to 518 in 2016, with a huge portion occurring within the city's downtown corridor.

Mountain View's auto burglaries tend to come in clusters and can shift wildly from month to month, ranging from just 14 cases in May to 74 in August and 64 in March. Following a lengthy investigation into the In-N-Out parking lot thefts in March, detectives arrested two men suspected of burglarizing vehicles, City sees spike in auto burglaries | News | Mountain View Online | https://mv-voice.com/news/print/2017/10/20/city-sees-spike-in-auto-burg... 1 of 2 9/10/2019, 7:18 AM
411
which led to a violent confrontation. One of the suspects got into his vehicle and slammed into an occupied police car in an attempt to escape the parking lot, which left one officer with serious injuries, Nelson said.

Police are advising that residents lock car doors and windows, park in well-lit areas and never leave their car running in order to prevent auto burglaries as well as vehicle thefts. Drivers should also avoid leaving valuable belongings in the car including electronic devices, purses, wallets or credit cards, especially within view.
"The most tried-and-true method still holds: Don't leave anything in your vehicle," Nelson said. "It is much easier to ensure your personal belongings are safe by taking them with you than leaving them behind because you'll be gone for 'just a few minutes.'"
Police are also hosting an informational event on residential and auto burglaries on Nov. 7, including tips on what attracts burglars as well as ways to prevent burglaries. It is the first in a series of educational events hosted by the Mountain View Police Department, and is open to the public. The event will be held at 7 p.m. in the police department's auditorium, located at 1000 Villa Street in Mountain View.

City sees spike in auto burglaries | News | Mountain View Online | https://mv-voice.com/news/print/2017/10/20/city-sees-spike-in-auto-burg... 2 of 2 9/10/2019, 7:18 AM
412

MOST POPULAR
WWIIstructure falls 200
feet fromcliffff onto SF
beach

1. 10 ‘ephemeral’ waterfalls
appear in Yosemite after
Calif.storms

2. The internet ismad 49ers
will get two days of extra
rest

3. Worst yipsin sports history might be key to 49ersCowboys

4. Tenn. burger bosssays
who should be scared of InN-Out's arrival

5. Food
Suspect in racist, anti-gay Bay Area In-N-Out rant faces hate crime charges Susana Guerrero, SFGATE
Dec. 27, 2022
A suspect who was heard on video making racist and homophobic comments and using a homophobic slur to two Asian customers at In-N-Out has been arrested, offificials said Monday.

A suspect was arrested for alleged hate crimes toward two Asian American customers who dined at the San Ramon In-N-Out at 2270 San Ramon Valley Blvd.

Douglas Zimmerman/SFGATE
new year decoration,1pc Winter
Plush Warm Sofa Cushion,
Thickened Super Soft Insulation…
10% OFF
Newsletters

THE DAILY
The Bay Area's best
free local newsletter.

Please enter your email address:

By signing up, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and acknowledge that your information will be used as described in our Privacy Policy

SIGN UP
413
San Ramon Police Department said it arrested a 40-year-old Denver man Monday after a viral TikTok video fifilmed Saturday appeared to depict the suspect verbally harassing Bay Area locals Arine Kim and Elliot Ha, who were recording themselves eating at the fast food restaurant.
“Are you guys fifilming yourselves eating?” a man is heard asking the friends in the video, which had nearly 14 million views as of Tuesday afternoon. “You’re weird homosexuals.”
The recording is focused on Kim and Ha for its entirety, minus a short clip when the camera turns to a man pouring himself a drink at the soda machine. After that shot, the man’s comments toward Kim and Ha become even more hostile and later threatening.

ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad THE DAILY
The Bay Area's best
free local newsletter.

Please enter your email address:

By signing up, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and acknowledge that your information will be used as described in our Privacy Policy
414
“Are you Japanese or Korean?” the man asks in the video. “I’m Korean,” Ha replies. “Yeah, that’s what I thought. You’re Kim Jong Un’s boyfriend, huh?” the man can be heard saying. “Normally, I could spit in your face, that’s some Filipino s—t.”

BEST OF SFGATE
Travel | The tiny Bay Area town modern life forgot: Canyon, California Tahoe | The wondrous story of Tahoe's most eccentric tycoon Local | The story behind that odd pantry in the wall in old SF homes History | Remembering the ugliest thing San Francisco ever built The man is then heard using a homophobic slur. Kim told KNTV that she grew apprehensive when the man said to meet him outside and reportedly tried to intimidate them with a prolonged stare. Kim added that she and Ha sat inside the In-N-Out restaurant until closing time and asked the staff if someone could walk them to their car for safety. "We happened to handle the situation relatively well, but had it been anyone else, had someone actually wanted to fifight, had someone been older than me or weaker than me or whatever it might be, it is really heartbreaking," Kim told KNTV. "I think that reality really sunk in for me, especially just kind of watching it back on the video." Price Drop Alert
Temu
new year
decoration,1pc Winter
Plush Warm Sofa…

ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad THE DAILY
The Bay Area's best
free local newsletter.

Please enter your email address:

By signing up, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and acknowledge that your information will be used as described in our Privacy Policy
415
Top PicksIn Shopping
San Ramon Police Department launched a criminal investigation following the Saturday incident. On Twitter, San Ramon police Chief Denton Carlson asked the public to help identify the suspect who was photographed after a different person reportedly witnessed “similar behavior” from the individual.

On Monday, the suspect was found and arrested on suspicion of two counts of committing a hate crime, San Ramon Police said in a press release.

More Food + Drink
— Where to get the It's-It flflavors you can't fifind at corner stores — This quirky spaghetti restaurant is a ‘dying breed’ in SF — How a circus worker opened the Bay Area's best butcher shop — Bay Area restaurant to replace celebrity owned burger chain

ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
5 architectural gems you can actually rent in PalmSprings Would you wear Dyson's new air-purifying headphones?
‘Foodie-menities’ are the new Airbnb 'it' factor
Written By
Susana Guerrero

THE DAILY
The Bay Area's best
free local newsletter.

Please enter your email address:

By signing up, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and acknowledge that your information will be used as described in our Privacy Policy
416
kimley-horn.com 3801 University Avenue, Suite 300, Riverside, CA 92501 951 543 9868 Appeal Responses
A-1 The commenter identifies himself as representing the Californians Allied for a Responsible Economy (“CARE CA”) and identifies the Project. This comment does not raise any issues with the environmental analysis provided in the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) and no further response is required.

A-2 The commenter provides a general summary of the Project Description as provided in the IS/MND. This comment does not raise any issues with the environmental analysis provided in the IS/MND and no further response is required.

A-3 The commenter states that CARE CA has submitted an Appeal letter and paid the appeal fee. This comment does not raise any issues with the environmental analysis provided in the IS/MND and no further response is required.

A-4 The commenter states their belief that the Project should be required to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) rather than a IS/MND because the Project may have significant, unmitigated air quality, public health, greenhouse gas emissions, public safety, and noise impacts that are not adequately disclosed or mitigated by the IS/MND. However, technical studies for the Project were prepared and determined that all impacts could be reduced to less than significant with mitigation. Responses to specific comments are provided below. No further response is required.

A-5 The commenter states that their comment letter includes technical reports for air quality, hazards, and noise prepared by their consultants. The commenter states the Project would cause significant cancer risk, potentially significant impacts from greenhouse gas emissions, significant noise impacts, and significant cumulative impacts. However, technical studies for the Project were prepared and determined that all impacts could be reduced to less than significant with mitigation. Responses to specific comments are provided below. No further response is required.

A-6 The commenter states that the Planning Commission was premature because the public comment period was still open at the time the hearing occurred. The Planning Commission hearing was held on the evening of January, 17, 2023. The comment period began on December 23, 2022 and ended on January 17, 2023, which resulted in a 26-day comment period. Because the project does not include any state agency approvals, a 20-day comment period is appropriate per CEQA Guidelines. As such, the City provided 6 additional days of public review beyond what is required per CEQA. No further response is required.

A-7 Comment noted.

A-8 Refer to Response A-6, above.

A-9 The commenter requests on behalf of CARE CA, that the City prepare an EIR. However, an EIR is not required because all Project impacts can be reduced to less than significant by implementing mitigation measures.

A-10 The commenter summarizes their view of the findings of the IS/MND stating that the Project construction and operation impacts would be less than significant and claims that the findings are unsubstantiated because the City did not quantify the risk and compare it to applicable thresholds. However, the IS/MND did analyze air quality impacts related to the construction and operation of the Project. Table 8, Construction-Related Emissions on page 70 of the Draft IS/MND shows construction emissions are well below SCAQMD significance thresholds for construction. Table 9, Long-Term Operational Emissions on page 71 of the Draft IS/MND shows that unmitigated operational emissions are also below are below SCAQMD significance thresholds for operations and that mitigation required to reduce GHG emissions would further reduce operational emissions. In addition, Table 11, Localized Significance of Construction Emissions and Table 12, Localized Significance of Operational Emissions on page 75 of the Draft IS/MND 417
kimley-horn.com 3801 University Avenue, Suite 300, Riverside, CA 92501 951 543 9868 shows that localized impacts on surrounding sensitive receptors would be less than significant. Localized significance thresholds represent the maximum emissions from a project that are not expected to cause or contribute to an exceedance of the most stringent applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard.

As shown in IS/MND Table 7, Table 8, Table 11, and Table 12 (see to pages 70 to 75), Project emissions are below the SCAQMD’s regional and localized thresholds. The SCAQMD set its CEQA significance thresholds based on the Federal Clean Air Act (FCAA). The National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) establish the levels of air quality necessary, with an adequate margin of safety, to protect public health. Projects that do not exceed the SCAQMD’s LSTs and mass emissions thresholds would not violate any air quality standards or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation and no criteria pollutant health impacts. Therefore, the commenter is incorrect that the IS/MND did not compare the Project to applicable thresholds and that the IS/MND’s findings are unsubstantiated.

Furthermore, contrary to the commenter’s assertion the Project is not required to prepare a Health Risk Assessment, as such an assessment was not necessary or appropriate under the applicable circumstances.

As described in more detail below, the Project is not subject to regulation under the Hots Spots Act, the 2003 Guidance Manual, or 2015 Guidance Manual, California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA) guidance, or SCAQMD guidance.

Air Toxics Hots Spots Act, the OEHHA 2003 Guidance Manual, and the OEHHA 2015 Guidance Manual The Air Toxics “Hot Spots” Information and Assessment Act of 1987 (Hot Spots Act) regulates stationary sources. The Hot Spots Act is designed to provide information to state and local agencies and to the general public on the extent of airborne emissions from stationary sources and the potential public health impacts of those emissions.1 The Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA), in conjunction with the California Air Resources Board (CARB) and the CAPCOA, has adopted guidance manuals for use in implementing the Air Toxics “Hot Spots” Program (Hot Spots Program) as part of the Hot Spots Act (Health and Safety Code Section 44360 et. seq.).

In 2003, OEHHA adopted the Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Risk Assessment Guidelines – The Air Toxics Program Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments (2003 Guidance Manual). OEHHA adopted a new version of the manual in March 2015, called the Hot Spots Program Guidance Manual for the Preparation of Risk Assessments (2015 Guidance Manual). The guidance manuals are intended to address health risks from airborne contaminants released by stationary sources.2 The intent of developing the guidance manuals is to provide health risk assessment (HRA) procedures for use in the Hot Spots Program or for the permitting of new or modified stationary sources.3Stationary sources are typically industrial-type uses that emit toxic air contaminants (TACs)4 and are regulated by and/or require permits from the Air Districts. Examples of stationary sources include: metal finishing/manufacturing, chrome plating facilities, various product manufacturing (e.g., food, chemical, material, etc.), stationary diesel engines (e.g., emergency backup generators), and refineries.5 The guidance manuals are not meant to be used for a health risk evaluation of typical non-stationary source land use projects such as residential and commercial development projects.
1 OEHHA, Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Risk Assessment Guidelines – The Air Toxics Program Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments, August 2003, Section 1.1, page. 1-1. See also, OEHHA, Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments, February 2015. Available at:
https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf, Section 1.1, page. 1-1 (accessed February 2023). 2 OEHHA, 2003 Guidance Manual and 2015 Guidance Manual at Section 1.1, page. 1-2. 3 Ibid.
4 “Toxic air contaminant” means an air pollutant which may cause or contribute to an increase in mortality or in serious illness, or which may pose a present or potential hazard to human health. See Health and Safety Code Section 39655. 5 CARB and CAPCOA, Risk Management Guidance for Stationary Sources, July 2015, Section I.D, page 5 and Appendix A, Table A-1: Statewide ARB Air Toxics Regulations for Stationary Sources. Available at:
https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/classic/toxics/rma/rmgssat.pdf (accessed February 2023). 418
kimley-horn.com 3801 University Avenue, Suite 300, Riverside, CA 92501 951 543 9868 OEHHA did not include CEQA significance thresholds applicable to construction activities or the operation of non-stationary source projects in the guidance manuals.6 Additionally, in the Risk Management Guidance for Stationary Sources of Air Toxics (2015), CARB and CAPCOA recognized that the OEHHA guidance manuals do not include guidance for CEQA and that this would be handled by individual Air Districts.7 CAPCOA Guidance
The CAPCOA guidance document Health Risk Assessments for Proposed Land Use Projects (2009) (CAPCOA HRA Guidance) provides lead agencies with guidance regarding when and how an HRA should be prepared.

It bases the risk assessment methodology on the procedures developed by the OEHHA to meet the mandates of the Hot Spots Act. CAPCOA recognized that “[w]hile local air districts have ample experience evaluating and mitigating toxic emissions from permitted stationary sources, most have limited experience preparing or reviewing risk assessments associated with multiple toxic sources or assessments for exhaust from mobile sources that are typically found when evaluating health risks to proposed land use projects.” To bridge the gap between stationary sources subject to regulation by the Air Districts under the Hot Spots Act and health risk impacts from and to land use projects, CAPCOA prepared the CAPCOA HRA Guidance.8 The CAPCOA HRA Guidance does not address how construction risk assessments should be conducted or how construction risk should be addressed in CEQA.

The operation of the Proposed Project is not a land use identified by the CAPCOA HRA Guidance that would generate toxic emissions (i.e., combustion related power plants, gasoline dispensing facilities, asphalt batch plants, or quarry operations), nor does it include a stationary source that emits TACs. Nor is the Proposed Project a warehouse or distribution facility that generates more than 100 trucks per day or more than 40 trucks with operating transport refrigeration units.9
For these reasons, the preparation of an HRA (or screening-level analysis) to assess the health risks due to the operation of the proposed Project is not required or recommended under the CAPCOA HRA Guidance.

The CAPCOA HRA Guidance does not consider construction-related health risks. Additional guidance is expected to be included in the CAPCOA HRA Guidance once the toxic emissions from construction can be better quantified with updated science. This has not yet occurred, and was not available when the City prepared the notice of preparation for the Project and its environmental analysis. As such, preparation of an HRA to assess health risks due to construction of the Project is not required. 6 SCAQMD, Final Environmental Assessment for: Proposed Amended Rule 307.1 – Alternative Fees for Air Toxics Emissions Inventory; Proposed Amended Rule 1401 – New Source Review of Toxic Air Contaminants; Proposed Amended Rule 1402 – Control of Toxic Air Contaminants from Existing Sources; SCAQMD Public Notification Procedures for Facilities Under the Air Toxics ‘Hot Spots’ Information and Assessment Act (AB 2588) and Rule 1402; and, SCAQMD Guidelines for Participating in the Rule 1402 Voluntary Risk (SCAQMD Final EA), pages 1-2 and 2-23, September 2016. Affected facilities are those in identified for the AB 2588 Air Toxics Hot Spots program, which does not include the proposed Project nor mixed-use projects like the proposed Project that are not stationary sources. Further, the SCAQMD states it “does not have guidance on construction Health Risk Assessments.”
7 CARB and CAPCOA, Risk Management Guidance for Stationary Sources, July 2015, Section III.J, page 16. 8 CAPCOA, Health Risk Assessment for Proposed Land Use Projects, July 2009, page. 1. “While local air districts have ample experience evaluating and mitigating toxic emissions from permitted statutory sources, most have limited experience preparing or reviewing risk assessment associated with multiple toxic sources or assessment for exhaust from mobile sources that are typically found when evaluating health risks to proposed land use projects. In order to provide consistency to lead agencies, project proponents and the general public throughout the state, the [CAPCOA] formed a subcommittee … to develop guidance on assessing the health risk impacts from and to proposed land use projects.” Available at http://www.capcoa.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/withstamp_CAPCOA_HRA_LU_Guidelines_8-6-09-min.pdf (accessed February 2023).
9 CARB, Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective, April 2005, available at:
https://www.arb.ca.gov/ch/handbook.pdf, SCAQMD, Health Risk Assessment Guidance for Analyzing Cancer Risks from Mobile Source Diesel Idling Emissions for CEQA Air Quality Analysis, August 2003. 419
kimley-horn.com 3801 University Avenue, Suite 300, Riverside, CA 92501 951 543 9868 SCAQMD Guidance
The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) is the Air District in charge of implementing, regulating, and enforcing the Hot Spots Program in the South Coast Air Basin. The SCAQMD has promulgated rules in furtherance of the Hot Spots Act,10 and prepared supplemental guidelines for preparing HRAs as a supplement to OEHHA’s guidance manuals.11 These SCAQMD rules and supplemental guidelines provide guidance for the preparation of HRAs for stationary and certain mobile sources, as described below.12 While these rules and guidelines indicate HRAs should be prepared for certain industrial projects, they do not require HRAs to be prepared as part of CEQA documents that evaluate the construction and operational impacts of residential and/or commercial projects, like the proposed commercial Project.13
Specifically, the Mobile Source Guidance provides interim guidance and recommended procedures for preparing HRAs for projects with the potential for DPM impacts, including the following limited activities:
(1) truck idling and movement (such as, but not limited to, truck stops, warehouse/distribution centers or transit centers); (2) ship hotelling at ports; and (3) train idling. The Project does not include any of these industrial-related activities. Rather, the project proposes a commercial development composed of a banquet hall, hotel, convenience store, and restaurant uses and would be accessed primarily by customer passenger vehicles. It would have significantly fewer trucks than the anticipated volume of trucks associated with a truck stop, warehouse/distribution center, or transit center. The Project's operational trucks would also be considerably fewer than 100 trucks per day or more than 40 trucks with operating transport refrigeration units, which is the criteria used by CAPCOA, SCAQMD, and CARB for considering the siting of new sensitive land uses near these types of sources.14 As such, the Project would not be a substantial source of DPMs and the preparation of an HRA is therefore not required.

With regard to construction impacts, the SCAQMD does not recommend preparing HRAs to determine the human health risk associated with the construction of land use projects. Specifically, the SCAQMD’s CEQA Air Quality Handbook (1993) (Air Quality Handbook) does not recommend analysis of TACs from short-term construction activities associated with land use development projects due to the limited duration of exposure related to construction impacts. According to SCAQMD methodology, health effects from carcinogenic air toxics are usually described in terms of individual cancer risk. Specifically, “Individual Cancer Risk” is the likelihood that a person continuously exposed to concentrations of TACs over a 70-year lifetime will contract cancer based on the use of standard risk assessment methodology.15 Because the construction schedule for the Project is based on estimates that the phases which require the most heavyduty diesel vehicle usage, such as demolition, site grading, excavation, would last for a much shorter duration (e.g., approximately 3 months), and the overall construction schedule would be limited to approximately 18 months, construction of the Project would not result in a substantial, long-term (i.e., 70- year) source of TAC emissions. No residual emissions and corresponding individual cancer risk are anticipated after construction. Because there is such a short-term exposure period (18 out of 840 months 10 See SCAQMD Rules and Regulations XIV – Toxics and Other Non-Criteria Pollutants, Rules 1401 and 1402. 11 SCAQMD, AB 2588 and Rule 1402 Supplemental Guidelines for Preparing Risk Assessment for the Air Toxics “Hot Spots” Information and Assessment Act, October 2020, Available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/planning/riskassessment/ab-2588-supplemental-guidelines.pdf (accessed February 2023). 12 SCAQMD, Health Risk Assessment Guidance for Analyzing Cancer Risks from Mobile Source Diesel Idling Emissions for CEQA Air Quality Analysis, August 2003.
13 SCAQMD Final EA, pages 1-2 and 2-23, September 2016. Affected facilities are those in identified for the AB 2588 Air Toxics Hot Spots program, which does not include the proposed Project nor mixed-use projects like the proposed Project that are not stationary sources. Further, the SCAQMD states it “does not have guidance on construction Health Risk Assessments.” 14 CARB, Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective, April 2005. Available at:
https://www.arb.ca.gov/ch/handbook.pdf (accessed February 2023). 15 SCAQMD, CEQA Handbook, 1993. Chapters 5, 9 and 10.
420
kimley-horn.com 3801 University Avenue, Suite 300, Riverside, CA 92501 951 543 9868 of a 70-year lifetime), further evaluation of construction TAC emissions within the IS/MND was not warranted.

In addition, the SCAQMD has not provided any guidance on how to apply the 2015 Guidance Manual to construction activities.16 Any SCAQMD guidance that may be provided in the future would be included on SCAQMD’s CEQA Air Quality Analysis Handbook webpage. At this time, the SCAQMD has not provided any additional guidance to the CEQA Air Quality Analysis Handbook webpage. The IS/MND followed the guidance, available at the time of the notice of preparation, included on this webpage, as detailed in the Methodology section on pages IV.A-36 - IV.A-37 and pages IV.A-43 - IV.A-44, which specifically address TACs and associated health risks.

In sum, the proposed Project is not a stationary source of toxic air contaminants or a generator of substantial truck traffic and would not otherwise expose sensitive receptors to toxic air contaminants above established regulatory thresholds. The commenter’s assertion that an HRA was required to be prepared for the Project is conflict with all applicable guidance issued by SCAQMD and other agencies responsible for regulating air quality impacts. Accordingly, an HRA assessing construction and/or operational impacts was not required to be prepared.

CalEnviroScreen and AB 535
Exhibit 1 attached to the comment letter also presents data from CalEPA’s CalEnviroScreen, which the City does not dispute. CalEnviroScreen is a mapping tool that helps identify California communities that are most affected by many sources of pollution and prioritize funding. CalEnviroScreen uses environmental, health, and socioeconomic information to produce scores for every census tract in the State. The scores are mapped so that different communities can be compared. An area with a high score is one that experiences a much higher pollution burden than areas with low scores. The CalEnviroScreen score measures the relative pollution burdens and vulnerabilities in one census tract compared to others and is not a measure of health risk.

As described above, the City disagrees with the assertion that additional risk analyses are needed. Given the short-term construction schedule of approximately 18 months (1.5 years), Project construction would not result in a long-term (e.g., 30 or 70 years) source of TAC emissions. The SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook does not recommend analysis of TACs from short-term construction activities associated with land use development projects. A construction HRA is not required by SCAQMD and no guidance for HRAs for construction has been adopted by SCAQMD or the City.

Exhibit 1 also notes that the project site is located within a designated disadvantaged community under Senate Bill (SB) 535. SB 535 does not include project specific requirements or prohibit developments within designated communities. SB 535 directs 25 percent of the proceeds from the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund (i.e., funds from the AB 32 cap-and-trade program) to go to projects that provide a benefit to disadvantaged communities (as identified by the OEHHA mapping).

Furthermore, SCAQMD’s Multiple Air Toxics Exposure Study (MATES V) (August 2021) shows that carcinogenic risk from air toxics in the South Coast Air Basin, based on the average concentrations at the 10 monitoring sites, is approximately 40 percent lower than the monitored average in MATES IV (2015) and 84 percent lower than the average in MATES II (2000).17 The results of SCAQMD’s ongoing research in air toxics shows that risk levels are decreasing despite development and vehicle traffic growth. This trend is expected 16 SCAQMD Final EA, page. 2-23, September 2016.
17 South Coast Air Quality Management District (August 2021). MATES V Final Report, page ES-16. Available at http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/planning/mates-v/mates-v-final-report-9-24-21.pdf?sfvrsn=6. Accessed February 2023.
421
kimley-horn.com 3801 University Avenue, Suite 300, Riverside, CA 92501 951 543 9868 to continue with the implementation of the various statewide policies focused on reducing mobile source emissions.

Project Construction Health Risk – For Informational Purposes Notwithstanding the above, a quantitative HRA was prepared to evaluate the human health risk associated with Project construction. The analysis uses the U.S. EPA AERMOD dispersion model, which takes into consideration SCAQMD representative meteorological data (Fontana meteorological station), site-specific conditions, and source-to-receptor distance. The HRA also identifies the baseline condition around the Project Site and evaluates the incremental change in health risk concentration exposure from DPM emitted by heavy-duty diesel construction equipment during construction of the Project and delivery trucks during operation of the Project. As indicated above, the primary source of potential air toxics associated with the Project is DPM from heavy-duty diesel trucks and construction equipment used during construction. The SCAQMD recommends that an HRA be conducted for substantial sources of long-term DPM operational sources (e.g., truck stops and warehouse distribution facilities) and has provided guidance for analyzing mobile source diesel emissions.18
The results from the health risk calculations provide an estimate of the potential risks and hazards to individuals through inhalation of Project construction DPM emissions over an 18-month duration. The estimated risks and hazards include: lifetime excess cancer risk estimates and cumulative chronic Hazard Index (HI) estimates for the receptor locations of concern.

The results of the HRA yield a maximum off-site individual cancer risk of 8.9 in one million for residential receptors located south of the Project site. The maximum chronic risk HI of 0.008 occurs within this same receptor area. As the Project would not emit carcinogenic or toxic air contaminants that result in impacts that exceed the maximum individual cancer risk of ten in one million or the chronic HI of 1.0, Project-related toxic emission impacts would be less than significant. It should be noted that these results represent the worst-case maximum concentration and conservatively use 95th percentile breathing rates, an age sensitivity factor of 10 (a maximum value), an exposure frequency of 350 days per year and a fraction of time at home of 100 percent. The HRA thus confirms that Project construction would not result in health impacts.

A-11 As discussed above, an HRA is recommended when siting sensitive land uses near specific sources of air pollution19 or for Potentially High Risk Level Facilities.20 The Project does not include significant sources of diesel trucks or other sources of DPM, and is thus not the type of project for which an HRA is recommended.

The commenter nonetheless claims that their consultant determined that Project emissions from DPM would result in a significant cancer risk at several homes in the neighborhoods south of the Project, assuming the average operational DPM concentration is 0.039 ug/m3 over a 30-year exposure. It is impossible to fully understand the basis for the commenter’s assertion, because the commenter did not provide the inputs used in AERMOD (only the results as an appendix). In addition, although the comment letter presents information that they state is from OEHHA’s HARP 2 Standalone Risk software, they do not provide any inputs or outputs to verify those results. Nevertheless, is it clear that the asserted cancer risk is based on deeply flawed assumptions and methodology.

Although the commenter’s attachment does not include model outputs, the letter indicates that the commenter took the total PM2.5 exhaust emissions that the IS/MND air quality study indicated would be generated by the Project, and then based their calculations on the improper assumption that all such emissions were the result of diesel fuel combustion. In fact, operational mobile source exhaust emissions 18 SCAQMD, Mobile Source Guidance, August 2003.
19 http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/california-air-resources-board-air-quality-and-land-usehandbook-a-community-health-perspective.pdf 20 http://www.aqmd.gov/home/rules-compliance/compliance/toxic-hot-spots-ab-2588/health-risk-assessment 422
kimley-horn.com 3801 University Avenue, Suite 300, Riverside, CA 92501 951 543 9868 from the Project are primarily from gasoline-fueled vehicles, such as passenger vehicles and light-duty pickup trucks, with a much smaller amount attributable to diesel-fueled trucks, as provided in the vehicle fleet percentages in the CARB on-road vehicle emissions factor (EMFAC) model. The commenter, however, incorrectly modeled all of the PM2.5 exhaust as DPM and then presumably applied the DPM cancer potency factor to arrive at their health risk conclusion. By treating all PM2.5 emissions as DPM emissions, when only a small portion of such emissions are DPM emissions, the commenter drastically overstated health impacts.

The commenter’s health risk analysis also incorrectly and absurdly assumes all of the Project’s PM2.5 exhaust emissions would occur on the project site. In fact, the emissions used by the commenter are the total PM2.5 exhaust, which is primarily off-site vehicle travel. Mobile sources, by their very nature, do not generate emissions at a single location, but rather along the entire vehicle trip; thus, mobile emissions, including PM2.5 emissions, attributable to the Project would be dispersed along regional roadways, not concentrated at a single location. When conducting HRAs, dispersion of pollutants is a critical consideration because health risk impacts are a direct result of TAC concentrations. The commenter’s HRA, however, improperly and incorrectly assumed that all mobile source emissions would occur at a single location, which results in concentrations at sensitive receptors that are artificially elevated to highly unrealistic levels.

Therefore, the commenter’s health risk results are misleading, highly inaccurate, and lack credibility. In other words, the commenter’s conclusions are not supported by credible evidence, much less substantial evidence, and therefore do no support the conclusion that the Project would have a significant health risk impact with respect to DPM emissions.

The project would not generate TAC emissions on-site and the commenter’s estimate is significantly overstated. However, a more accurate approach (but still conservative) would be to estimate the proportion of on-site DPM exhaust based on the diesel truck fleet mix and the proportion of time diesel vehicles would operate on-site. The CalEEMod fleet mix for the project assumed 1.73 percent of vehicles accessing the site would be heavy-duty trucks, 1.14 percent would be medium-duty trucks, and 0.72 percent would be light-heavy duty trucks. Conservatively assuming that 10 percent of off-site mobile sources emissions would occur on-site, the 0.552 pounds per day of on-site emissions used in the commenter’s analysis would actually be 0.00198 pounds per day, which is approximately 99.6 percent lower. Therefore, the commenter’s calculated risk of 33.8 in one million should actually be closer to 0.12 in one million, which is far below the 10 in one million threshold. It should be noted that this risk assessment is provided for informational purposes using conservative estimates to fully respond to the comment. As discussed above, the project would not include operational TAC sources and a health risk assessment is not required for the project.

A-12 The commenter states that the Planning Commission’s decision to adopt the IS/MND without requiring a HRA is a violation of CEQA. As addressed in Response A-11, the Project does not require an HRA.

A-13 The commenter states that City Council should vacate the Planning Commission’s decision and require the City to prepare an EIR that includes a HRA. As addressed in Response A-11, the Project does not require an HRA.

A-14 The commenter asserts that the ISMND failed to adequately evaluate potential health risk impacts that could arise from the disturbance of contaminated soils. Consistent with American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) International E1527-13, environmental databases and records were reviewed to determine whether the Project site or surrounding properties are included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 (“Cortese” list).21 Review indicated that the Project site is not included on the Cortese list, and no surrounding properties are identified on this list of 21 DTSC. 2021. Cortese List. Available at:
https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/search?cmd=search&reporttype=CORTESE&site_type=CSITES,FUDS&status=ACT,BKLG,COM&r eporttitle=HAZARDOUS+WASTE+AND+SUBSTANCES+SITE+LIST+%28CORTESE%29. Accessed March 16, 2021. 423
kimley-horn.com 3801 University Avenue, Suite 300, Riverside, CA 92501 951 543 9868 hazardous materials sites. These findings are reinforced in the City’s General Plan which notes that “there are no Superfund sites within the City of Fontana.”22 Therefore, no further investigation was warranted, and the ISMND appropriately concluded that no impact would occur in this regard. The commenter nonetheless insists that the site is within the “fallout zone of the Kaiser Steel Mill,” which operated from 1942-83, and thus, may have contaminated soil that could be disturbed during the Project’s construction.

The provided letter from Clark and Associates cites several reports from the 1970s indicating that the mill released pollutants into the air while it was operating. It fails to include any evidence, however, indicating that soil within the area of the Project—let alone the Project-site itself—was contaminated by mill operations. Furthermore, as the commenter acknowledges, the mill was located some 3.4 miles away from the Project site. Thus, if the Project site were considered to be within the ”fallout zone” of the mill, the same would be true for much of the City. Over the four decades since the mill stopped operating, the City has rapidly expanded and numerous sites in the vicinity of the Project, and between the mill and the Project site, have been developed. During that time, the City is not aware of any discovery of contaminated soil that would be consistent with the commenter’s claims. Thus, the City’s experts do not find the commenter’s claim that the Project site may be contaminated as a result of the past operations of the Kaiser Steel Mill several miles away to be credible.

Nevertheless, in response to the commenter’s purported concerns, a formal Phase I environmental site assessment was conducted by RSB Environmental. As documented in the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report, dated February 28, 2023 and attached hereto as Exhibit A, there is no evidence of environmental contamination on the Project site and thus “no further actions are recommended.” (See Phase I, pp. 31-32 [Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendations].) In addition, notwithstanding RSB’s expert determination that no further investigation was warranted, in order to conclusively disprove the commenter’s contention regarding possible soil contamination, soil sampling and testing is currently underway. Because it takes several weeks to receive the results of such testing, the results were not available at the time of this response, however, such results are expected to be available in advance of the City Council hearing of CARE CA’s appeal. Based on the Phase I investigation, the City expects such results to confirm there is no soil contamination requiring further action. In the unlikely event that soil contamination is discovered, an additional mitigation measure requiring appropriate remedial activities prior to Project construction will be recommended.

A-15 Refer to Response A-14 above.

A-16 The commenter asserts that the IS/MND did not analyze construction noise impacts at an existing sensitive receptor located at 15911 Highland Avenue. The receptor in question is designated as General Commercial and was originally a hotel. However, the property is currently operating as Sunrise Market, a small convenience/liquor store and is not a sensitive receptor. The commenter claims that a three-bedroom apartment is located above the convenience store based on an internet listing offering the property for sale. As accessed on February 28, 2023, the listing does not appear to include language claimed by the commenter, and the City is not aware of any information confirming that the property is currently being used as a residence. Nonetheless, as further discussed below, even assuming the property is a sensitive receptor, the conclusions set forth in the IS/MND remain unchanged.

A-17 The commenter states that construction of Development B would occur 39 feet from the purported residence and would exceed FTA’s threshold of 80 dBA during demolition, site preparation, grading, and building construction phases of the Project without mitigation. The commenter also states that the IS/MND should include mitigation measures to reduce noise impacts to less than significant. Assuming that the Sunrise Market is considered a sensitive receptor, according to the FTA’s methodology all equipment is assumed to be located at the center of the Project site to approximate equipment moving throughout the site during construction activities. In addition, the commenter is incorrect in stating the property is 39 feet from Development B. The property in question is 78 feet from the center of Development A and 300 feet 22 City of Fontana. 2015 – 2035 General Plan Update. Chapter 11, Noise and Safety - Hazards and Hazardous Materials, page 11.7. 424
kimley-horn.com 3801 University Avenue, Suite 300, Riverside, CA 92501 951 543 9868 from the center of Development B. Based on the shape and orientation of the site, the sensitive receptors to the south of the site are located closer to the center of the site than 15911 Highland Avenue. Therefore, construction noise impacts at 15911 Highland Avenue would be lower than those analyzed in the IS/MND.

A-18 The commenter states that the Project would result in significant impacts and the City should be required to prepare an EIR. As addressed in response A-17, the Project would not result in significant noise impacts.

A-19 The applicant is required to pay Development Impact Fees toward police services per the City’s Municipal Code. With compliance of the applicable specifications and design principles pursuant to the FPD’s C.P.T.E.D, continued maintenance of an approximately one officer to 1,000 resident ratio, and the payment of associated DIF, additional police services are not necessary and potential impacts on police protection due to implementation of the Project would be less than significant. Refer also to Responses A-85 and A86.

A-20 The commenter states that City Council should vacate the Planning Commission’s decision and require the City to prepare an EIR that includes a meaningful public services impact analysis. As addressed in response A-19, the Project would not result in significant and unavoidable impacts. As such, a Mitigated Negative Declaration is the appropriate CEQA document for the Project.

A-21 The City disagrees with the commenter. The Project is consistent with land use and zoning for the Project site, and the Planning Commission made its decision based on substantial evidence.

A-22 Refer to Responses A-1 through A-21 above.

A-23 The commenter suggests that the Planning Commission violated CEQA by approving the IS/MND and requests the City prepare an EIR for the Project. Refer to Responses A-1 through A-21 above. The City disagrees that an EIR needs to be prepared. As demonstrated by the technical studies prepared in connection with the IS/MND and further explained in these responses, there is no substantial evidence indicating supporting the claim that the Project would result in significant impacts after mitigation.

January 17, 2023 Letter
A-24 The commenter identifies himself as representing the Californians Allied for a Responsible Economy (“CARE CA”) and identifies the Project. This comment does not raise any issues with the environmental analysis provided in the IS/MND and no further response is required.

A-25 The comment describes project location. This comment does not raise any issues with the environmental analysis provided in the IS/MND and no further response is required.

A-26 The comment is a general summary of the project description. This comment does not raise any issues with the environmental analysis provided in the IS/MND and no further response is required.

A-27 Refer to Response A-6.

A-28 Refer to Response A-4 and Response A-7 through A-8.

A-29 Refer to Response A-6. Additionally, as identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the Project, no significant and unavoidable impacts were identified.

A-30 The comment identifies the technical support used to prepare comment. This comment does not raise any issues with the environmental analysis provided in the IS/MND and no further response is required. 425
kimley-horn.com 3801 University Avenue, Suite 300, Riverside, CA 92501 951 543 9868 A-31 This comment provides a statement of interest and does not raise any issues with the environmental analysis provided in the IS/MND and no further response is required.

A-32 Refer to Response A-6.

A-33 Refer to Response A-6.

A-34 Refer to Response A-6.

A-35 Refer to Response A-6.

A-36 Refer to Response A-6. The commenter does not identify which documents are missing from the MND. As such, no response is required.

A-37 Refer to Response A-36, above.

A-38 As previously discussed, the comment period began on December 23, 2022 and ended on January 17, 2023, which resulted in a 26-day comment period. The MND and all associated technical studies were made publicly available during the entirety of the comment period.

A-39 Refer to Response A-38, above. CEQA Section 21092(b)(1) includes public notice requirements for agencies preparing environmental impact reports or negative declarations. It provides, in relevant part “the notice shall specify… the address where copies of the draft environmental impact report or negative declaration, and all documents referenced in the draft environmental impact report or negative declaration, are available for review…” (Pub. Res. Code, §21092(b)(1)). CEQA Guidelines section 15087(c)(5) clarifies that the notice shall specify “the address where copies of the EIR and all documents incorporated by reference in the EIR will be available for public review. This location shall be readily accessible to the public during the lead agency’s normal working hours.” (14 Cal. Code Regs., §15087(c)(5)). CEQA Guidelines Section 15087(c)(5) was most recently amended effective 2018 to clarify that the term “referenced in the Draft environmental report” for the purposes of CEQA Section 21092 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15087 means “incorporated by reference” as described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15150. In its comments on the amendment, the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research observed that “if the requirement for the lead agency to make documents available for public inspection were to include all documents simply referenced or cited in an EIR or negative declaration, the requirement would be burdensome, unnecessary and unreasonable on lead agencies.” These authorities clarify that CEQA requires that the City provide notice of the address where all documents incorporated by reference in the DEIR are available for public inspection. The City respectfully declines the commenter’s request to extend the public review and comment period for the Project because the City has fully complied with its obligations pursuant to CEQA Section 21092(b)(1) and CEQA Guidelines Section 15087(c)(5). The City will continue responding to the commenter’s requests for documents in compliance with the California Public Records Act (Gov. Code, §§6250 et seq).

A-40 Refer to Response A-38 above.

A-41 Refer to Response A-4 and Response A-9.

A-42 CEQA Guidelines Section 15384 states: (a) “Substantial evidence” as used in these guidelines means enough relevant information and reasonable inferences from this information that a fair argument can be made to support a conclusion, even though other conclusions might also be reached. Whether a fair argument can be made that the project may have a significant effect on the environment is to be determined by examining 426
kimley-horn.com 3801 University Avenue, Suite 300, Riverside, CA 92501 951 543 9868 the whole record before the lead agency. Argument, speculation, unsubstantiated opinion or narrative, evidence which is clearly erroneous or inaccurate, or evidence of social or economic impacts which do not contribute to or are not caused by physical impacts on the environment does not constitute substantial evidence. (b) Substantial evidence shall include facts, reasonable assumptions predicated upon facts, and expert opinion supported by facts.

A fair argument requires substantial evidence (CA Code of Regulations. § 15384(a)). Substantial evidence, for purposes of the fair argument standard, includes “fact, a reasonable assumption predicated upon fact, or expert opinion supported by fact.”23 Under CEQA Guidelines Section 15384, argument, speculation, unsubstantiated opinion or narrative, evidence that is not credible, and evidence of social and economic impacts does not constitute substantial evidence. (Pala Band of Mission Indians v. County of San Diego (1998) 68 Cal.App.4th 556, 580.)
Refer to responses A-4 and A-5 as well as A-10 through A-11 regarding the project’s air quality impacts, and Response A-16 and A-17 regarding the project’s noise impacts. As noted in Response A-11, the commenter’s modeling and results are misleading, highly inaccurate and lack credibility. Therefore, the commenter’s conclusions are not supported by credible evidence, much less substantial evidence, and therefore do not support the conclusion that the Project would have a significant health risk impact with respect to DPM emissions. As the data provided by the commenter does not accurately represent the project, it does not support a fair argument based on substantial evidence. Neither this nor any other comment presents substantial evidence of a fair argument that the project may cause a significant impact. In the absence substantial evidence provided in comments, an IS/MND is the proper means to evaluate a project under CEQA. This comment does not raise any new information with respect to the disposition of significant environmental impacts or issues evaluated in the IS/MND and therefore, no further response is required.

A-43 Refer to Response A-42. Additionally, as identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the Project, no significant and unavoidable impacts were identified.

A-44 Refer to response A-42.

A-45 Refer to response A-42. As noted above, the comment does not provide substantial evidence of a fair argument that the project may cause a significant impact. In the absence substantial evidence provided in comments, an IS/MND is the proper means to evaluate a project under CEQA.

A-46 The comment discusses mitigation measures and CEQA guidelines in general does and not reference a specific mitigation measure in the IS/MND or specific issues with the environmental analysis in the IS/MND.

No further response is required.

A-47 Refer to Response A-1 through A-23 above.

A-48 The City respectfully disagrees. The MND fully describes the Project, starting on page 5 of the MND. The MND also includes multiple exhibits to further describe and visualize the Project.

A-49 Refer to Response A-48.

A-50 Refer to Responses A-16 and A-17 regarding noise. The localized air quality analysis (IS/MND page 73 to page 75) followed the SCAQMD’s Localized Significance Thresholds Methodology Document (July 2008) and demonstrated that Project emissions would not exceed the SCAQMD’s Localized Significance Thresholds (LSTs). The analysis used thresholds from the SCAQMD’s lookup tables based on the closest receptors located 32 meters away. However, as shown below, Project emissions would not exceed the SCAQMD’s 23 Pub. Res. Code § 21080(e)(1) (emphasis added); Citizens for Responsible Equitable Environmental Development v. City of Chula Vista (2011) 197 Cal.App.4th 327, 331 (“CREED”). 427
kimley-horn.com 3801 University Avenue, Suite 300, Riverside, CA 92501 951 543 9868 most conservative thresholds at 25 meters (appropriate for receptors located 25 meters away or less).

Therefore, no impact would occur at the adjacent convenience store.

Activity
Emissions (Maximum Pounds Per Day)
Nitrogen Oxide
(NOx)
Carbon Monoxide
(CO)
Coarse Particulate
Matter (PM10)
Fine Particulate
Matter (PM2.5)
Maximum Construction Emissions 33.08 20.59 9.28 5.42
SCAQMD Localized Construction
Screening Threshold (adjusted for 3.5
acres at 25 meters)
220 1,359 11 6
Threshold Exceeded? No No No No
Operations – On-Site and Mobile
Source Emissions 5.52 4.68 0.42 0.42
SCAQMD Localized Screening
Threshold
(5 acres at 25 meters)
270 1,746 4 2
Threshold Exceeded? No No No No
A-51 Refer to Response A-10 and Response A-11.

A-52 Refer to Response A-10 and Response A-11.

A-53 Refer to Response A-10 and Response A-11.

A-54 Refer to Response A-10 and Response A-11.

A-55 Refer to Response A-10 and Response A-11.

A-56 Refer to Response A-10 and Response A-11.

A-57 Refer to Response A-10 and Response A-11.

A-58 Refer to Response A-10. The case law referenced in the comment concerns health effects from exceedances of criteria pollutant thresholds (i.e., not Toxic Air Contaminants [TACs]). Project emissions are below the SCAQMD’s regional and localized thresholds. The SCAQMD set its CEQA significance thresholds based on the Federal Clean Air Act (FCAA). The National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) establish the levels of air quality necessary, with an adequate margin of safety, to protect public health. Projects that do not exceed the SCAQMD’s LSTs and mass emissions thresholds would not violate any air quality standards or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation , and thus would not contribute to health impacts.

A-59 Refer to Response A-10 and Response A-11.

A-60 Refer to Response A-10 and Response A-11.

A-61 Refer to Response A-10 and Response A-11.

A-62 Refer to Response A-10 and Response A-11.

A-63 Refer to Response A-10 and Response A-11.

A-64 Refer to Response A-11.
428
kimley-horn.com 3801 University Avenue, Suite 300, Riverside, CA 92501 951 543 9868 A-65 Refer to Response A-11.

A-66 Refer to Response A-11.

A-67 Refer to Response A-14.

A-68 Refer to Response A-14.

A-69 Refer to Response A-14.

A-70 Refer to Response A-14.

A-71 Refer to Response A-14. Additionally, the MND fully discloses all potential health and safety risks associated with development of the Project.

A-72 The commenter asserts MM GHG-3 (TDM Program) is non-binding and improperly deferred. The commenter is incorrect. MM GHG-3 is included in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and the required TDM program is required to be submitted to the City prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. It thus fully enforceable and binding on the applicant. Further, while MM GHG-3 allows for some flexibility in the particulars of the TDM program, it specifies numerous features that the TDM Program is required to include. Therefore, there are assurances that reductions in commute VMT through feasible TDM measures would be provided by the Project and would be implemented as part of future Certificates of Occupancy for future tenants.

A-73 Refer to Response A-72.

A-74 Refer to Response A-72.

A-75 Refer to Response A-72.

A-76 TDM measures were incorporated and quantified in CalEEMod’s mitigation module. The model outputs in IS/MND Appendix A shows that CalEEMod’s TRT-1 (Implement Trip Reduction Program), TRT-3 (Provide Ride Sharing Program), and TRT-11 (Employee Vanpool/Shuttle) were applied. According to the CAPCOA guidance Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures (2011), such a trip reduction program may include carpooling encouragement, ride-matching assistance, preferential carpool parking, flexible work schedules for carpools, half time transportation coordinator, vanpool assistance, and bicycle end-trip facilities (parking, showers and lockers). All of these features are expressly required to be included in the TDM Program per MM GHG-3. TRT-3 increases vehicle occupancy by ride sharing, will resulting in fewer cars driving the same trip, and thus decreasing VMT. TRT-11 requires an employer-sponsored vanpool or shuttle. These measures would be facilitated by the transportation coordinator required in MM GHG-3.

CalEEMod caps the maximum reduction based on the CAPCOA report to avoid double counting. TRT-1 (Commute Trip Reduction Programs) applied in CalEEMod is defined by CAPCOA as a voluntary multistrategy program that encompasses a combination of individual measures (including ride sharing and vanpool). As TRT-1 encompasses a variety of measures, the CalEEMod/CAPCOA calculation includes a means of preventing double-counting of reductions for individual measures that are included in this strategy by setting a maximum level of reductions permitted for a combined set of strategies within a voluntary program.24
24 California Air Pollution Control Officers Association, Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures, page 218, 2010. 429
kimley-horn.com 3801 University Avenue, Suite 300, Riverside, CA 92501 951 543 9868 CAPCOA notes that the TRT-3 (Ride Sharing) strategy is often part of Commute Trip Reduction Program.25 Additionally, CAPCOA notes that vanpools (TRT-11) can capture 2 to 20 percent mode share. 26 The Project’s
CAPCOA modeling in the IS/MND used the 2 percent minimum to be conservative and to avoid double counting. It should be noted that the percentage reduction reflects emission reductions from running emissions. According to CAPCOA, the actual emissions reduction would be even lower because the reduction is conservatively not applied to starting and evaporative emissions.

As discussed in the IS/MND, MM GHG-3 requires carpooling encouragement, ride-matching assistance, preferential carpool parking, flexible work schedules for carpools, half time transportation coordinator, vanpool assistance, and including secure bicycle storage, showers for employees, lockers, etc. around the project site. In this case, the performance standard is to provide the above-mentioned amenities and services to encourage trip reduction. Information sharing and marketing are important components to successful trip reduction strategies. Because all of above-referenced features are required to be included in the TDM Program, application of TRT-1, TRT-3, and TRT-11 is appropriate. While the TDM Program may include additional features and strategies, no additional reductions were taken in CalEEMod. The mobile source emissions described in the ISMND are thus reasonable and conservative. The TDM program would be verified by the City prior to the issuance of occupancy permits.

A-77 Refer to Response A-76.

A-78 The commenter argues that the IS/MND improperly relies on MM GHG-2 to reduce the Project’s GHG emissions by 669.87 MTCO2e per year, representing 100 percent of the expected building load, due to the fact that MM GHG-2 does not necessarily require the installation of on-site renewable energy generation.- MM GHG-2 requires the installation of solar photovoltaic (PV) panels or other source of renewable energy generation on-site, or that the applicant otherwise acquire energy from the local utility that has been generated by renewable sources (for example, Southern California Edison Green Rate), that would provide 100 percent of the expected building load. Electricity purchased from the Southern California Edison Green Rate is from 100 percent renewable sources.27 Specifically Southern California Edison purchases renewable energy to meet the needs of Green Rate participants from solar renewable developers within their service territory. This is typically a voluntary program that is required per MM GHG-2. Therefore, the purchasing electricity from the Green Rate plan would still offset the project’s electricity emissions. To the extent there is any confusion regarding the information presented in IS/MND Table 15, the energy-related emissions of 1,557.62 MTCO2e per yeardo not account for the purchase/generation of renewable electricity (which is listed separately as -669.87. MTCO2e. Thus, purchasing electricity generated by renewable sources would reduce energy emissions to 887.57 MTCO2e per year. Thus, regardless of whether the applicant ultimately determines to comply with MM GHG-2 via the installation of on-site generation or via purchase of electricity from renewable sources, the reduction associated with such measure is accurate.

A-79 Refer to Response A-78.

A-80 Refer to Response A-72 through Response A-79.

A-81 Refer to Response A-16 and Response A-17.

A-82 Refer to Response A-16 and Response A-17.

A-83 Comment noted.
25 California Air Pollution Control Officers Association, Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures, page 228, 2010. 26 California Air Pollution Control Officers Association, Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures, page 255, 2010. 27 Southern California Edison, Power Content Label, https://www.sce.com/sites/default/files/customfiles/Web%20files/Prospective%20Product%20Content%20Label.pdf 430
kimley-horn.com 3801 University Avenue, Suite 300, Riverside, CA 92501 951 543 9868 A-84 The commenter is restating information contained in the MND.

A-85 As identified on page 168 of the MND, with compliance of the applicable specifications and design principles pursuant to the FPD’s C.P.T.E.D, continued maintenance of an approximately one officer to 1,000 resident ratio, and the payment of associated DIF, additional police services are not necessary and potential impacts on police protection due to implementation of the Project would be less than significant.

A-86 The commenter claims there is substantial evidence demonstrating that In-N-Out restaurants experience serious crime. The only evidence cited, however, are newspaper articles discussing a handful of incidents at various In-N-Out locations throughout California over a multi-year period. There are some 268 In-N-Out locations in California. (www.in-n-out.com/locations/california) Thus, articles relating to a few isolated incidents that required a police response do not constitute substantial evidence suggesting that such restaurants generate above-average demand for police services (let alone substantiate the hyperbolic claims made by the commentor). Nevertheless, in response to this comment, City planning staff further consulted with the City’s police department to confirm that the Project, including In-N-Out can be adequately served by the department. As indicated in a March 7, 2023 letter from the Chief of Police attached hereto as Exhibit B, “[b]ased on the lack of issues with the pre-existing In N Out restaurant in the City of Fontana, police do not anticipate cause for extra patrol or an increase in calls for service.” The Chief further confirmed the police department has no concerns about and thus supports the proposed Project.

Accordingly, the City has sufficient police resources to serve the Project, and any claim to the contrary is baseless. Refer to Response A-85 above.

A-87 The commenter restates what entitlements are being sought for the Project.

A-88 As previously stated, the MND and associated technical studies determined that the Project would not create any significant and unavoidable impacts. As such, the preparation of an EIR is not necessary.

Additionally, City staff prepared findings for each permit, as noted in the staff report for the Project.

A-89 The MND fully analyzed and disclosed land use inconsistencies, starting on page 144 of the MND. The Project has a land use designation of General Commercial (C-G) and is within the General Commercial (C-2) Zoning District. The proposed Project is consistent with the zoning, but it will require the approval of CUP No. 20-025 and CUP No. 20-026 to allow the development of the hotels. Therefore, development of the proposed Project would not conflict with the City’s land use plan, policy, or regulation and therefore, would be less than significant.

A-90 Refer to Response A-88.

A-91 Refer to Response A-1 through A-23 above. The Project does not have any significant and unavoidable environmental impacts.

Refer to Responses A-4 and A-5 as well as A-10 through A-11 regarding the project’s air quality impacts, and Response A-16 and A-17 regarding the project’s noise impacts. Technical studies for the Project were prepared and determined that all impacts could be reduced to less than significant with mitigation.

A-92 Refer to Response A-10 regarding CalEnviroScreen and AB 535.

A-93 Refer to Response A-10 regarding CalEnviroScreen and AB 535.

A-94 Refer to Response A-6. Additionally, as identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the Project, no significant and unavoidable impacts were identified. As such, an EIR is not warranted nor necessary.

A-95 Refer to Responses A-1 through A-94, above.
431

PHASE I

ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT REPORT
PROPERTY ASSESSED:

7.03 acres land with multiple parcels
Fontana, San Bernardino County, California 92336
RSB Project No. 2302252
Report Date: February 28, 2023
Prepared For:

Ace Building Company
432
February 28, 2023
Ace Building Company
RE: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment of

7.03 acres land with multiple parcels
Fontana, San Bernardino County, California 92336
To Whom It May Concern:

Attached please find our Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (the report) for the above-mentioned asset (the Subject Property). During the survey and research, our field inspector met with agents representing the Subject Property, or agents of the owner, and reviewed the Subject Property and its history. The report was completed according to the terms and conditions authorized by you (Client and User). This report has been completed in general conformance with the ASTM Standard E1527-13 and E1527-21. The purpose of this report is to acquire environmental information, observe the general condition and maintenance status of the Subject Property, to suggest remediation and/or maintenance practices considered customary for the Subject Property to continue in its current operation, compared to properties of similar age and condition, and to identify recognized environmental conditions in connection with the Subject Property described in this report.

Reliance on the report and the information contained herein shall mean (i) the report may be relied upon by a lender to be selected by Ace Building Company, in determining whether to make a loan evidenced by a note secured by the Subject Property (“the Mortgage Loan”); (ii) the report may be relied upon by any purchaser in determining whether to purchase the Mortgage Loan (but not the Subject Property) from that lender, or an interest in the Mortgage Loan or securities backed or secured by the Mortgage Loan, and any rating agency rating securities representing an interest in the Mortgage Loan or backed or secured by the Mortgage Loan; (iii) the report may be referred to in and included, in whole or in part, with materials offering for sale the Mortgage Loan or an interest in the Mortgage Loan or securities backed or secured by the Mortgage Loan; (iv) the report speaks only as of its date in the absence of a specific written update of the report signed and delivered by RSB Environmental.

There are no intended or unintended third-party beneficiaries to this report, except as expressly stated herein.

RSB is an independent contractor, not an employee of either the issuer or the borrower, and its compensation was not based on the findings or recommendations made in the report or on the closing of any business transaction.
433
We declare that, to the best of our professional knowledge and belief, we meet the definition of Environmental Professional as defined in §312.10 of 40 CFR 312 and we have the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a property of the nature, history, and setting of the Subject Property. We have developed and performed the all appropriate inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312.

Thank you very much for the opportunity to provide environmental consulting services to Ace Building Company. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned.

Respectfully submitted,
Sachin Butala, P.E.

RSB Environmental
434

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Project Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

1.0 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

1.1 Purpose . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

1.2 Scope of Work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9

2.0 Site Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

2.1 Ownership and Location . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

2.2 Subject Property Improvements and Current Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

2.3 Municipal Services and Utilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

2.4 Surrounding Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

3.0 Records and Municipal Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

3.1 User Provided Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

3.2 Reason for Performing Phase I ESA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

4.0 Environmental Records . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15

4.1 Standard Environmental Record Sources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15

4.2 Environmental Record from Government Agencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19

4.3 Vapor Migration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19

4.4 Physical Setting Sources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20

5.0 Historical Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22

5.1 Historical Research . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22

5.2 Aerial Photographs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22

5.3 Historical Topographic Maps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23

5.4 Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24

5.5 City Directories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25

5.6 Prior Assessment Reports . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25

5.7 Additional Historical Records . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26

5.8 Interviews . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26

5.9 Historical Use Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27

6.0 Subject Property Reconnaissance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28

6.1 Methodology and Limiting Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28

6.2 Subject Property Reconnaissance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28

6.3 Surrounding Property Reconnaissance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30

7.0 Findings, Conclusion and Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31

7.1 Findings and Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31

7.2 Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 435

8.0 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33

9.0 Assumptions, Limitations and Exceptions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34

9.1 Significant Assumptions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34

9.2 Limitations and Exceptions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34

10.0 Reliance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36

APPENDIX
Appendix A Figures
Appendix B Property Photographs
Appendix C Historical Research Documentation
Appendix D Regulatory Records Documentation
Appendix E Other Supporting Documentation
Appendix F Qualifications Of Environmental Professionals 436

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
RSB Environmental (RSB) has performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) in general accordance with the scope of work and limitations set forth by RSB's proposal dated February 23, 2023 for Property located at 7.03 acres land with multiple parcels, Fontana, San Bernardino County, California 92336 (the “Subject Property”).

The Phase I Environmental Site Assessment is designed to provide Ace Building Company with an assessment concerning environmental conditions (limited to those issues identified in the report), as they exist at the Subject Property. This assessment was conducted utilizing generally accepted ESA industry standards in general accordance with ASTM Standard E1527-13 and E1527-21, Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I ESA Process.

Property Details
Property Details General Information
Current Owner: City Of Fontana
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment

7.03 acres land with multiple parcels
Fontana, California 92336
1 RSB Project No. 2302252
437
Property Details
Property Details General Information
Legal Description TRACT 3348 LOT 32 HIGHLAND
HAVEN EX ST; ALL THOSE
PORTIONS OF LOTS 21 THROUGH 31,
TRACT NO. 3348, HIGHLAND HAVEN

MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED
AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A

POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID
LOT 21, DISTANT THEREON, SOUTH
00 DEG 15'26" EAST, 0.197 METERS
(0.65 FEET) FROM THE NORTHWEST

CORNER THEREOF, SAID POINT

ALSO BEING ON A NON- TANGENT

CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHERLY AND
HAVING A RADIUS OF 335.860
METERS (1101.90 FEET); THENCE

EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE

FROM A TANGENT BEARING OF
SOUTH 79 DEG 46'36" EAST,
THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 05
DEG 37'20", AN ARC LENGTH OF

32.957 METERS (108.26 FEET) TO THE

BEGINNING OF A COMPOUND
CURVE, HAVING A RADIUS OF 30.480
METERS (100.00 FEET); THENCE

ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 29 DEG 54'03",
AN ARC LENGTH OF 15.906 METERS
(52.18 FEET); THENCE SOUTH 44 DEG
15'13" EAST, 13.497 METERS (44.29

FEET) TO THE BEGINNING OF A

CURVE, CONCAVE

NORTHWESTERLY AND HAVING A
RADIUS OF 15.240 METERS (50.00
FEET); THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY,

EASTERLY, NORTHEASTERLY,

NORTHERLY AND

NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID

CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 208 DEG 45'25", AN ARC
LENGTH OF 55.527 METERS (182.17

FEET) TO THE BEGINNING OF
COURSE "A"; THENCE ALONG SAID
COURSE "A" SOUTH 89 DEG 28'57"
EAST, 115.516 METERS (378.99 FEET)
TO THE EAST LINE OF LOT 30 OF

SAID TRACT AND THE BEGINNING
OF COURSE "B"; THENCE ALONG
SAID COURSE "B", SOUTH 70 DEG
37'46" EAST, 19.738 METERS (64.76
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment

7.03 acres land with multiple parcels
Fontana, California 92336
2 RSB Project No. 2302252
438
Property Details
Property Details General Information

FEET) TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID
LOT 31; THENCE ALONG LAST SAID
EAST LINE SOUTH 0 DEG 15'51" EAST,

35.051 METERS (115.00 FEET) TO THE

SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT
31; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEG 44'20"
WEST, 204.489 METERS (670.90 FEET)

TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF
SAID LOT 21; THENCE ALONG THE
WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 21, NORTH
0 DEG 15'26" WEST, 43.514 METERS
(142.76 FEET) TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING; TRACT 3348 LOT 20
HIGHLAND HAVEN EX 1/2 INT MIN
RTS WOSE; TRACT 3348 LOT 19
HIGHLAND HAVEN EX 1/2 INT MIN
RTS WOSE; TRACT 3348 LOT 18
HIGHLAND HAVEN EX 1/2 INT MIN
RTS WOSE; TRACT 3348 LOT 17
HIGHLAND HAVEN EX 1/2 INT MIN
RTS WOSE; TRACT 3348 LOT 16
HIGHLAND HAVEN EX 1/2 INT MIN
RTS WOSE; TRACT 3348 LOT 15
HIGHLAND HAVEN; TRACT 3348 LOT
14 HIGHLAND HAVEN; TRACT 3348
LOT 161 HIGHLAND HAVEN EX 1/2
INT MIN RTS WOSE AND EX ST;
TRACT 3348 LOT 162 HIGHLAND
HAVEN EX ST; TRACT 3348 LOT 163
HIGHLAND HAVEN EX ST; TRACT
3348 LOT 164 HIGHLAND HAVEN EX
ST; TRACT 3348 LOT 165 HIGHLAND
HAVEN EX ST; TRACT 3348 LOT 166
HIGHLAND HAVEN EX ST; TRACT
3348 LOT 167 HIGHLAND HAVEN EX
ST; TRACT 3348 LOT 168 HIGHLAND
HAVEN EX ST; TRACT 3348 LOT 169
HIGHLAND HAVEN EX ST; TRACT
3348 LOT 170 HIGHLAND HAVEN EX
ST; TRACT 3348 LOT 171 HIGHLAND
HAVEN EX ST; TRACT 3348 LOT 172
HIGHLAND HAVEN EX 1/2 INT MIN
RTS WOSE; TRACT 3348 LOT 173
HIGHLAND HAVEN EX ST; TRACT
3348 LOT 174 HIGHLAND HAVEN EX
ST; TRACT 3348 LOT 175 HIGHLAND
HAVEN EX ST; TRACT 3348 LOT 176
HIGHLAND HAVEN EX ST; TRACT
3348 LOT 177 HIGHLAND HAVEN EX
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment

7.03 acres land with multiple parcels
Fontana, California 92336
3 RSB Project No. 2302252
439
Property Details
Property Details General Information
ST; A PORTION OF LOT 178 OF
HIGHLAND HAVEN TRACT NO. 3348

BEGINNING AT THE MOST
NORTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT;
THENCE SOUTH 0 DEG 09 MIN 00
SECONDS EAST 63.10 FEET (19.233

METERS) ALONG THE EASTERLY

LINE OF SAID LOT, TO A POINT IN

A NON-TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE

NORTHERLY AND HAVING A
RADIUS OF 798.00 FEET (243.231

METERS), AND TO WHICH A RADIAL
LINE BEARS SOUTH 6 DEG 05 MINS
28 SECONDS WEST, SAID CURVE
ALSO LYING 52.00 FEET (15.850

METERS) NORTHERLY FROM AND

CONCENTRIC WITH THE

CENTERLINE OF SOUTH HIGHLAND
AVENUE, THENCE WESTERLY 80.04
FEET (24.3 96 METERS) ALONG SAID

CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 5 DEG 44 MINS 49

SECONDS, TO THE

NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID
LOT; THENCE NORTH 57 DEG 18
MINS 00 SECONDS EAST 93.72 FEET
(28.566 METERS) ALONG SAID LINE,
TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
TRACT 3348 LOT 35 HIGHLAND
HAVEN EX ST; TRACT 3348 LOT 34
HIGHLAND HAVEN EX ST; TRACT
3348 LOT 33 HIGHLAND HAVEN EX
ST
Current Use: Vacant land
Current Occupants: Unknown
Total # of Existing Buildings: Not applicable
Total Sq. Ft. of Building: Not applicable
Date Building was built: Not applicable
Field Assessor: Mr. Joseph Landeros
Report Writer: Sachin Butala
Address Provided: 7.03 acres land with multiple
parcels, Fontana, California 92336
Total Acreage of Land: Approximately 7.03 - acres
Tax ID #: Refer table 2.1
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment

7.03 acres land with multiple parcels
Fontana, California 92336
4 RSB Project No. 2302252
440
Property Details
Property Details General Information
Date of Site Reconnaissance: February 27, 2023
Areas/Units that were inaccessible to the RSB field
assessor:

None
Were enough (units/offices/buildings/acres) inspected to ensure that the inspection was homogenous?
Yes
Did the field assessor notice any unusual odors on or
from the subject site or adjoining sites during the site reconnaissance?
No
Historical Use Summary
Based on available historical information, the Subject Property was an undeveloped land at least until 1954. Building structures were depicted on the Subject Property since 1955 until at least 1999. The building structures have been demolished and since 2000, the Subject Property has continued to be a vacant land.

Surrounding Property
Direction Adjoining Site
North Highland Avenue followed by Foothill Freeway beyond which there is a vacant land (Address not available)
East Citrus Avenue followed by Rush My Passport (16120 South Highland Avenue) West Sunrise Market (15911 South Highland Avenue) followed by Catawba Avenue beyond which is vacant land (15891 South Highland Avenue; 15892 Torrey Avenue) South South Highland Avenue followed by residential properties (6571, 6572 Jacaranda Avenue; 6571, 6572 Tokay Avenue; 6571, 6572 Cherimoya Avenue); Vacant land (6584 Citrus Avenue)
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment

7.03 acres land with multiple parcels
Fontana, California 92336
5 RSB Project No. 2302252
441
Findings and Conclusions
RSB has performed a Phase I ESA in general conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Standard E1527-13 and E1527-21 for the 7.03 acres land with multiple parcels, Fontana, San Bernardino County, California 92336, the Subject Property. Any exceptions to or deletions from this practice are described in Section 10.0 of this report.

1. This assessment has revealed no evidence of RECs in connection with the Subject Property.

2. This assessment has revealed no evidence of HRECs in connection with the Subject Property.

3. This assessment has revealed no evidence of CRECs in connection with the Subject Property.

4. This assessment has revealed no evidence of BERs in connection with the Subject Property.

De Minimis Environmental Conditions
• RSB did not identify de minimis environmental conditions in connection with the Subject Property.

Recommendations
Based on the conclusions, no further actions are recommended.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment

7.03 acres land with multiple parcels
Fontana, California 92336
6 RSB Project No. 2302252
442

PROJECT SUMMARY

PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT SUMMARY
Property located at

7.03 acres land with multiple parcels, Fontana
San Bernardino County, California 92336
Number Section Name NFA REC CREC HREC OEC BER Comments

4.1.1 Subject Property  None

4.1.2 Surrounding
Properties 
None

4.3 Vapor Migration  None

4.4 Physical Setting
Sources 
None

5.1 Historical Research  None

6.2.1 Subject Property
Reconnaissance 
None

6.3.1 Surrounding Property
Reconnaissance 
None
NFA - No Further Action
REC - Recognized Environmental Condition
CREC - Controlled Recognized Environmental Condition
HREC - Historical Recognized Environmental Condition
OEC - Other Environmental Considerations
BER - Business Environmental Risk
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment

7.03 acres land with multiple parcels
Fontana, California 92336
7 RSB Project No. 2302252
443

1.0 INTRODUCTION
RSB Environmental (RSB) was retained by Ace Building Company (Client) to conduct a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of 7.03 acres land with multiple parcels, Fontana, San Bernardino County, California 92336 (the Subject Property). The protocol used for this assessment is in general conformance with ASTM Standard E1527-13 and E1527-21, Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I ESA Process.

On February 27, 2023, Mr. Joseph Landeros, a Site Inspector with RSB, conducted a site reconnaissance to assess the possible presence of petroleum products and hazardous materials at the Subject Property. RSB’s investigation included a review of aerial photographs, a reconnaissance of adjacent properties, background research and a review of available local, State and Federal regulatory records regarding the presence of petroleum products and/or hazardous materials at the Subject Property.

RSB contracted Environmental Risk Information Services (ERIS) to perform a computer database search for local, State and Federal regulatory records pertaining to environmental concerns for the Subject Property and properties near the Subject Property (refer to Regulatory Records).

1.1 Purpose
The purpose of the ESA is to identify Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs), Controlled Recognized Environmental Conditions (CRECs) and Historical Recognized Environmental Conditions (HRECs) and de minimis conditions as defined by ASTM E1527-13 and E1527-21.

The term REC is defined as the presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at the subject property due to a release to the environment, the likely presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at the subject property due to a release or likely release to the environment, or the presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on or at the subject property under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment.

The term CREC is defined as a previous release of hazardous substances or petroleum products affecting the subject property that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or authorities and meets unrestricted use criteria established by the applicable regulatory authority or authorities, without subjecting the property to any controls.

The term HREC is defined as a previous release of hazardous substances or petroleum products affecting the subject property that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or authorities and meets unrestricted use criteria established by the applicable regulatory authority or authorities, without subjecting the property to any controls.

The term de minimis condition is defined as a condition that generally does not present a threat to human health or the environment and that generally would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies. Conditions determined to be de minimis are not RECs or CRECs.”
The term Business Environmental Risk (BER) is defined as a risk that can have a material environmental or environmentally-driven impact on the business associated with the current or planned use of a parcel of commercial real estate, not necessarily limited to those environmental issues required to be investigated as defined by ASTM.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment

7.03 acres land with multiple parcels
Fontana, California 92336
8 RSB Project No. 2302252
444
This Phase I ESA was also performed to permit the User to satisfy one of the requirements to qualify for the innocent landowner, contiguous property owner, or bona fide prospective purchaser limitations on the scope of Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) (42 U.S.C. §9601) liability (hereinafter, the landowner liability protections, or “LLPs”). ASTM Standard E1527-13 and E1527-21 constitute “all appropriate inquiry into the previous ownership and uses of the property consistent with good commercial or customary practice as defined at 42 U.S.C. §9601(35) (B).

RSB understands that the findings of this study will be used by the Client to evaluate a pending financial transaction in connection with the Subject Property.

1.2 Scope of Work
The scope of work for this Phase I ESA is in general accordance with the requirements of ASTM Standard E1527-13 and E1527-21. RSB warrants that the findings and conclusions contained herein were accomplished in accordance with the methodologies set forth in the Scope of Work. These methodologies are described as representing good commercial and customary practice for conducting a Phase I ESA of a property for the purpose of identifying RECs. No other warranties are implied or expressed.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment

7.03 acres land with multiple parcels
Fontana, California 92336
9 RSB Project No. 2302252
445

2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION

2.1 Ownership and Location
According to the San Bernardino County Assessor's Office, the Subject Property is currently owned by City Of Fontana.

The Subject Property is a 7.03 acres land with multiple parcels, Fontana, San Bernardino County, California 92336. The Subject Property includes 30 irregular shaped parcels, identified by the San Bernardino County Assessor's Office as Refer table 2.1 totaling approximately 7.03 acres. The Subject Property is located on the northwest corner of the intersection of Citrus Avenue and South Highland Avenue. Figure 1 - Location Map depicts the location of the Subject Property. Figure 2 - Site Plan depicts the configuration of the Subject Property and adjoining properties. Figure 3 - Topographic Map depicts the location of the Subject Property on the 2021 Devore, CA United States Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5 Minute Topographic Quadrangle.

Parcel ID Address
Parcel Size
(Acres)
Building Size (Sq.

Ft.) Year Constructed
0228301200000 16089 Highland
Avenue

0.16 Not applicable Not applicable
0228301510000 Address not
available

1.90 Not applicable Not applicable
0228301080000 92336 Highland
Avenue

0.20 Not applicable Not applicable
0228301070000 15967 Highland
Avenue

0.20 Not applicable Not applicable
0228301060000 15957 Highland
Avenue

0.20 Not applicable Not applicable
0228301050000 15947 Highland
Avenue

0.20 Not applicable Not applicable
0228301040000 Address not
available

0.20 Not applicable Not applicable
0228301030000 15929 Highland
Avenue

0.20 Not applicable Not applicable
0228301020000 15919 Highland
Avenue

0.20 Not applicable Not applicable
0228301490000 15910 Torrey
Avenue

0.17 Not applicable Not applicable
0228301480000 15918 Torrey
Avenue

0.17 Not applicable Not applicable
0228301470000 15928 Torrey
Avenue

0.17 Not applicable Not applicable
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment

7.03 acres land with multiple parcels
Fontana, California 92336
10 RSB Project No. 2302252
446
Parcel ID Address
Parcel Size
(Acres)
Building Size (Sq.

Ft.) Year Constructed
0228301460000 15938 Torrey
Avenue

0.17 Not applicable Not applicable
0228301450000 15946 Torrey
Avenue

0.17 Not applicable Not applicable
0228301440000 15956 Torrey
Avenue

0.17 Not applicable Not applicable
0228301430000 15966 South
Highland Avenue

0.17 Not applicable Not applicable
0228301420000 15976 Torrey
Avenue

0.17 Not applicable Not applicable
0228301410000 15984 Torrey
Avenue

0.17 Not applicable Not applicable
0228301400000 15994 Torrey
Avenue

0.17 Not applicable Not applicable
0228301390000 16006 Torrey
Avenue

0.17 Not applicable Not applicable
0228301380000 16014 Torrey
Avenue

0.17 Not applicable Not applicable
0228301370000 16024 Torrey
Avenue

0.17 Not applicable Not applicable
0228301360000 16034 Torrey
Avenue

0.17 Not applicable Not applicable
0228301350000 16042 Torrey
Avenue

0.17 Not applicable Not applicable
0228301340000 16052 Torrey
Avenue

0.26 Not applicable Not applicable
0228301330000 16062 Torrey
Avenue

0.34 Not applicable Not applicable
0228301520000 Address not
available

0.04 Not applicable Not applicable
0228301230000 6556 Citrus
Avenue

0.11 Not applicable Not applicable
0228301220000 6546 Citrus
Avenue

0.15 Not applicable Not applicable
0228301210000 6536 Citrus
Avenue

0.17 Not applicable Not applicable
Total 7.03 -
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment

7.03 acres land with multiple parcels
Fontana, California 92336
11 RSB Project No. 2302252
447

2.2 Subject Property Improvements and Current Use
The Subject Property is currently vacant land.

2.3 Municipal Services and Utilities
No information regarding utilities were provided by Ms. Aman Corr.

Utility Provider
Electricity Not Applicable
Natural Gas Not Applicable
Sewer Not Applicable
Water Not Applicable
Solid Waste Not Applicable

2.4 Surrounding Properties
Property used in the vicinity of the Subject Property is primarily characterized by commercial, residential properties and undeveloped land. No visual evidence of adverse environmental conditions was observed during the survey of the adjoining properties. The following table outlines the findings of adjoining properties to the site.

Surrounding Property
Direction Adjoining Site
North Highland Avenue followed by Foothill Freeway beyond which there is a vacant land (Address not available)
East Citrus Avenue followed by Rush My Passport (16120 South Highland Avenue) West Sunrise Market (15911 South Highland Avenue) followed by Catawba Avenue beyond which is vacant land (15891 South Highland Avenue; 15892 Torrey Avenue) South South Highland Avenue followed by residential properties (6571, 6572 Jacaranda Avenue; 6571, 6572 Tokay Avenue; 6571, 6572 Cherimoya Avenue); Vacant land (6584 Citrus Avenue)
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment

7.03 acres land with multiple parcels
Fontana, California 92336
12 RSB Project No. 2302252
448

3.0 RECORDS AND MUNICIPAL INFORMATION

3.1 User Provided Information
Pursuant to ASTM Standard E1527-13 and E1527-21, it is the responsibility of the User, the Owner of the Property, and the Property Owners designated Contact to ensure compliance with the All Appropriate Inquiry (AAI); innocent land owner defense. As such, RSB requested Property information from the User, the Property Owner, and the Property Owners designated Contact in the form of a Phase I ESA Questionnaire. Failure to provide the requested information may be considered a data gap. A completed Pre-Survey Questionnaire was not returned to RSB.

User Provided Information
Database
Records
Identified Findings
Title Records No The User did not provide RSB with any
recorded land title records or lien records,
filed under federal, tribal, state, or local
law, for review.

Environmental Liens or Activity and Use
Limitation
No The User was not aware of any
environmental liens associated with the
Subject Property. In addition, the User had
no knowledge of any use or activity
limitations.

Specialized Knowledge No The User did not inform RSB of any specialized knowledge of the Subject
Property that would re-late to the presence
of RECs, in connection with the Subject
Property or indicate that they were aware
of any commonly known or reasonably
ascertainable information within the local
community about the Subject Property that
is material to RECs in connection with the
Subject Property.

Commonly Known or Reasonably
Ascertainable Information
No The User was not aware of any
environmental conditions associated with
the Subject Property.

Valuation Reduction for Environmental
Issues
No The User was not aware of any valuation
reductions associated with the Subject
Property.

Owner, Property Manager and Occupant
Information
Yes According to the San Bernardino County
Assessor's Office, the APNs for the Subject
Property is given table 2.1. The Subject
Property is currently owned by City Of
Fontana. The Subject Property is currently
vacant land.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment

7.03 acres land with multiple parcels
Fontana, California 92336
13 RSB Project No. 2302252
449

3.2 Reason for Performing Phase I ESA
The purpose of this Phase I ESA is to identify existing or potential RECs, CRECs, and/or HRECs in connection with the Subject Property. An REC, CREC, and HREC are defined under ASTM Standard E1527-13 and E1527-21.

This Phase I ESA was also performed to permit the User to satisfy one of the requirements to qualify for the innocent landowner, contiguous property owner, or bona fide prospective purchaser limitations on scope of Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) (42 U.S.C. §9601) liability (hereinafter, the “landowner liability protections,” or “LLPs”). ASTM Standard E1527-13 and E1527-21 constitutes all appropriate inquiry into the previous ownership and uses of the property consistent with good commercial or customary practice as defined at 42 U.S.C. §9601(35) (B).

RSB understands that the findings of this study will be used by the Client to evaluate a pending financial transaction in connection with the Property.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment

7.03 acres land with multiple parcels
Fontana, California 92336
14 RSB Project No. 2302252
450

4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS

4.1 Standard Environmental Record Sources
Information from standard Federal and state environmental record sources was provided through Environmental Risk Information Services (ERIS). Data from governmental agency lists are updated and integrated into one database, which is updated as data is released. This integrated database also contains postal service data in order to enhance matchings for the Subject Property. Records from one government source are compared to records from another to clarify any ambiguities for the Subject Property. The demographic and geographic information available provides assistance in identifying and managing risk.

The accuracy of the geocoded locations is approximately +/-300 feet.

In some cases, location information supplied by the regulatory agencies is insufficient to allow the database companies to geocode facility locations. These facilities are listed under the Orphans section within the ERIS report. According to the ERIS report, 6 orphan facilities were identified.

RSB attempted to locate these sites via vehicular reconnaissance and interviews with personnel familiar with the area. Based on this research, RSB did identify listed orphan sites within the approximate minimum search distances that may be considered likely to have impacted conditions at the Subject Property.

In addition, as recommended by ASTM Standard E1527-13 and E1527-21, the standard Federal, State, and Tribal Environmental Record sources within the ERIS report were utilized to identify potential on-site and/ or off-site RECs, CRECs, and HRECs. If identified, the relative listed REC(s), CREC(s), and/or HREC(s) is discussed below. A copy of the ERIS Report has been included in Regulatory Records Appendix of this report.

Regulatory Records Review
Standard
Environmental Record
Sources
Approximate
Minimum Search
Distance Per ASTM
(mi) Subject Property Off-Site Properties
Federal CERCLIS 0.5 0 0
Federal CERCLIS
NFRAP

0.5 0 0
Federal Delisted NPL 0.5 0 0
Federal ERNS Property Only 0 0
Federal IC/EC Property Only 0 0
Federal NPDES 0.5 0 0
Federal NPL 1 0 0
Federal RCRA

CORRACTS
1 0 0
Federal RCRA
Generators/
Non-Generators
Property and Adjoining 0 0
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment

7.03 acres land with multiple parcels
Fontana, California 92336
15 RSB Project No. 2302252
451
Standard
Environmental Record
Sources
Approximate
Minimum Search
Distance Per ASTM
(mi) Subject Property Off-Site Properties
Federal RCRA
non-CORRACTS TSD

0.5 0 1
State and Tribal
Brownfield Sites

0.5 0 0
State and Tribal
Hazardous Waste Sites
(CERLCIS Equivalent)

0.5 0 4
State and Tribal
Hazardous Waste Sites
(NPL Equivalent)

0.5 0 0
State and Tribal Landfill
and/or Solid Waste
Disposal Sites

0.5 0 0
State and Tribal
Construction and
Demolition Debris
Recyclers

0.5 0 2
State and Tribal Leaking
Tanks

0.5 0 1
State and Tribal
Registered UST and
AST
Property and Adjoining 0 0
Permitted Underground
Storage Tank (UST) in
Geotracker

0.25 0 1
State and Tribal
Voluntary Cleanup

0.5 0 0
San Bernardino County
- CUPA List

0.25 0 12
California
Environmental
Reporting System
(CERS) Tanks

0.25 0 2
Additional
Environmental Records
(HAZNET)
Property and Adjoining 2 0
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment

7.03 acres land with multiple parcels
Fontana, California 92336
16 RSB Project No. 2302252
452

4.1.1 Subject Property
The Artitects, the Subject Property tenant, was identified on the HAZNET database with EPA ID:
"CAC001148368". No violations were identified on the environmental records associated with this listing.

As per the California Department of Toxic Substances Control Board, the current regulatory status of the identified listing is inactive. Hence. based on the lack of reported violations and current regulatory status, it is unlikely to consider the identified listing as an environmental concern. A copy of the supporting document is attached in Appendix E.

Under the entity, HUD/Federal, the Subject Property tenant, was identified on the HAZNET database with EPA ID: "CAC001338000". As per the California Department of Toxic Substances Control Board, the current regulatory status of the identified listing is inactive. No violations were identified on the environmental records associated with this listing. Hence. based on the lack of reported violations and current regulatory status, it is unlikely to consider the identified listing as an environmental concern. A copy of the supporting document is attached in Appendix E.

4.1.2 Surrounding Properties
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD Facilities
One (1) site was identified on Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD Facilities database on the environmental records reviewed. The identified site is located more than 0.25 miles from the subject property. Based on the distance and separation due to urban development, it is unlikely to consider the identified site to represent a significant environmental concern to the subject property.

State and Tribal EnviroStor (State Equivalent CERCLIS)
Four (4) sites were identified on State and Tribal EnviroStor (State Equivalent CERCLIS) database on the environmental records reviewed. The identified sites are located more than 0.25 miles or downgradient from the subject property. Based on the distance, presumed hydrogeologic gradient and separation due to urban development, it is unlikely to consider the identified sites to represent a significant environmental concern to the subject property.

State and Tribal Construction and Demolition Debris Recyclers Two (2) sites were identified on State and Tribal Construction and Demolition Debris Recyclers database on the environmental records reviewed. The identified sites are located more than 0.10 miles from the subject property. Based on the distance and separation due to urban development, it is unlikely to consider the identified sites to represent a significant environmental concern to the subject property.

State and Tribal Leaking Underground Fuel Tank Reports (LPST) One (1) site was identified on State and Tribal Leaking Underground Fuel Tank Reports database on the environmental records reviewed. The identified site is located at or more than 0.10 miles from the subject property. Based on the distance and separation due to urban development, it is unlikely to consider the site to represent a significant environmental concern to the subject property. The description regarding the site is given below.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment

7.03 acres land with multiple parcels
Fontana, California 92336
17 RSB Project No. 2302252
453
Details
Site name and location Former Gas Station located at 16173 Highland Avenue Distance/ Direction/
Gradient

0.10 miles - east - Up-gradient
Global ID T0607108153
Capacity/ Contents Unknown
Year identified Unknown
Comments Former Gas Station was identified on the State and Tribal Leaking Petroleum Storage Tanks database with Global ID "T0607108153". No documents regarding the leak incident and the associated tanks were available for review with the Geotracker portal of the California State Water Resources Control Board. The current cleanup status is "completed and case closed as of 5/14/ 1993". Based on the closure, distance, and separation due to roadway, it is unlikely to consider the identified site as an environmental concern to the subject property. A copy of the supporting document is attached in Appendix E.

San Bernardino County - CUPA List
12 sites were identified on San Bernardino County - CUPA List database on the environmental records reviewed. The identified sites are located more than 0.05 miles or downgradient from the subject property.

Based on the distance, presumed hydrogeologic gradient and separation due to urban development, it is unlikely to consider the identified sites to represent a significant environmental concern to the subject property.

California Environmental Reporting System (CERS TANK)
Two (2) sites were identified on California Environmental Reporting System (CERS TANK) database on the environmental records reviewed. The identified sites are located more than 0.05 miles or downgradient from the subject property. Based on the distance, presumed hydrogeologic gradient and separation due to urban development, it is unlikely to consider the identified sites to represent a significant environmental concern to the subject property.

Permitted Underground Storage Tank in Geotracker (UST)
One (1) site was identified on California Environmental Reporting System (CERS TANK) database on the environmental records reviewed. The identified site is located more than 0.05 miles and downgradient from the subject property. Based on the distance, presumed hydrogeologic gradient and separation due to urban development, it is unlikely to consider the identified sites to represent a significant environmental concern to the subject property.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment

7.03 acres land with multiple parcels
Fontana, California 92336
18 RSB Project No. 2302252
454
Unplottable Sites
The environmental records search sometimes includes a list of “unplottable” or “orphan” sites which may or may not be located within the minimum search distances. 6 sites were listed but it does not appear to be the subject property or adjacent properties.

4.2 Environmental Record from Government Agencies
In addition, to the information requested and discussed from the agencies listed below, RSB also requested information on the presence of activity and use limitations (AULs) on the Property from these agencies.

As defined by ASTM Standard E1527-13 and E1527-21, AULs are the legal or physical restrictions or limitations on the use of, or access to, a site or facility: 1) to reduce or eliminate potential exposure to hazardous substances or petroleum products in the soil or groundwater on the Property; or 2) to prevent activities that could interfere with the effectiveness of a response action, in order to ensure maintenance of a condition of no significant risk to public health or the environment. These legal or physical restrictions, which may include institutional and/or engineering controls (IC/ECs), are intended to prevent adverse impacts to individuals or populations that may be exposed to hazardous substances and petroleum products in the soil or groundwater on the Subject Property.

Agency Contacted Date of Information Request
California Environmental Protection Agency February 28, 2023 City of Fontana Clerk's Office February 28, 2023
San Bernardino County Clerk of the Board February 28, 2023 As a part of this assessment, a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request was submitted to local and state municipal agencies to obtain historical records, property use, or any open violations regarding the subject property. As of February 28, 2023, RSB has not received a response to this inquiry. Upon receipt of the agency response, if the provided information has a material effect on the findings of this report, RSB will forward this information as an addendum to this report. If no response is received, or no material information is identified, our report will not be modified.

4.3 Vapor Migration
RSB reviewed reasonably ascertainable information for the subject and nearby properties, including a regulatory database, files for nearby release sites, and/or historical documentation, to determine if potential vapor-phase migration concerns may be present which could impact the subject property.

RSB did not identify significant on-site concerns and/or regulated listings from nearby sites which suggests that a vapor-phase migration concern currently exists at the subject property.

This vapor migration screening was conducted in accordance with ASTM E1527-13 and E1527-21, and is not intended to satisfy the requirements of ASTM E2600-15. The scope of this screening was limited to visual observations and review of the environmental database report and did not include the collection and laboratory analysis of air samples to confirm or refute the presence of airborne contaminants by vapor intrusion.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment

7.03 acres land with multiple parcels
Fontana, California 92336
19 RSB Project No. 2302252
455

4.4 Physical Setting Sources

4.4.1 Topography
The United States Geological Survey (USGS), Devore, CA Quadrangle 7.5-minute series topographic map was reviewed for this ESA. This map was published by the USGS in 2021. Based on a review of the topographic map, the Subject Property is located approximately 1,506 feet above mean sea level (MSL).

The contour lines also indicate that the Subject Property is sloping towards south.

4.4.2 Soils/Geology
According to the Soil Survey of San Bernardino County, California provided by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) at their website:
www.websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov.The soils beneath the Subject Property is composed of the following soils:

Soboba gravelly loamy sand, 0 to 9 percent slopes, classified as excessively drained and identified on the Hydrologic Soil Group A, soils in this group have low runoff potential when thoroughly wet. Water is transmitted freely through the soil.

The geology of the Subject Property is summarized in the following table:

Source Geology
ERIS Based on USGS information, the geology consists of Quaternary alluvium and marine deposits from the Pliocene to Holocene series era.

The primary rock type is alluvium and the secondary rock type is terrace.

4.4.3 Hydrology
Information specific to the Subject Property regarding the depth to groundwater and direction of groundwater flow was not readily available for the Subject Property. According to information obtained from the Soil Survey of San Bernardino County, California, USDA, NRCS website:
www.websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov, the depth to the high groundwater table is estimated to be greater than 6 feet below the ground surface. In addition, based on local topography, groundwater in the general vicinity of the Subject Property is inferred to flow radially towards south.

The nearest surface water body is Santa Ana River located approximately 6.83-miles to the southeast of the Subject Property.

According to available information, the City of Fontana serves the Subject Property and/or vicinity. The Subject Property does not utilize the groundwater directly beneath the Property for domestic purposes.

4.4.4 Wetlands
Review of the U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish & Wildlife Service’s National Wetland Inventory (NWI) Map (available online at https://www.fws.gov/wetlands/data/Mapper) indicated that the Subject Property is not located on or adjacent to a wetlands area. It should be noted that a detailed wetland study or wetland delineation was not included within the scope of this assessment.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment

7.03 acres land with multiple parcels
Fontana, California 92336
20 RSB Project No. 2302252
456

4.4.5 Flood Zone Information
A review of a Flood Insurance Rate Map, published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, was performed. According to Panel Number 06071C7915H dated August 28, 2008, the Subject Property appears to be located within Flood Zone “Flood zone X Unshaded”. Flood zone X Unshaded, defined as areas of minimal flood hazard.

4.4.6 Oil and Gas Exploration
According to the National Pipeline Mapping System (NPMS), No oil and gas pipelines or wells are located on the Subject Property and adjoining properties.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment

7.03 acres land with multiple parcels
Fontana, California 92336
21 RSB Project No. 2302252
457

5.0 HISTORICAL INFORMATION
RSB attempted to develop a history of the previous uses of the Subject Property and surrounding area in order to help identify the likelihood of past uses having led to RECs in connection with the Subject Property. Efforts were made to identify the uses of the Subject Property back to the Subject Property's first use, or back to 1940, whichever is earlier.

The following sections summarize the findings of RSB's historical research.

5.1 Historical Research
The following table outlines decades of historical data reviewed as part of this assessment:

Historical
Research
1850
to
1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 NA Aerial
Photographs         
Historical
Topographic
Maps
        
Sanbon Fire
Insurance
Maps

City
Directories       
Prior
Assessment
Reports

Additional
Historical
Records


5.2 Aerial Photographs
Available aerial photographs were reviewed utilizing NETR Online (www.historicaerials.com). The summary of historical images are discussed in the table below:

Aerial Photographs - Subject Property
Year(s) Property Description
1938, 1948 Undeveloped land depicted
1959, 1966, 1980, 1985, 1994 Building structures depicted 2002, 2005, 2009, 2010, 2012,
2014, 2016, 2018, 2020
Vacant land depicted
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment

7.03 acres land with multiple parcels
Fontana, California 92336
22 RSB Project No. 2302252
458
Aerial Photographs - Surrounding Areas
Year(s) North East West South
1938 Undeveloped land
and roadway
depicted
Undeveloped land
depicted across
roadway
Undeveloped land
depicted
Undeveloped land
depicted
1948 Digital data not
available
Undeveloped land
depicted across
roadway
Undeveloped land
depicted
Undeveloped land
depicted
1959 Undeveloped land
and roadway
depicted
Undeveloped land
depicted across
roadway
Existing building
structure alongside
and undeveloped
land depicted
across roadway
Building structures
and roadway
depicted
1966, 1980 Undeveloped land
and roadway
depicted
Undeveloped land
depicted across
roadway
Existing building
structure alongside
and building
structure depicted
across roadway
Building structures
and roadway
depicted
1985, 1994 Appears to be used
as agricultural land
and roadway
depicted
Undeveloped land
depicted across
roadway
Existing building
structure alongside
and building
structure depicted
across roadway
Building structures
and roadway
depicted
2002, 2005, 2009,
2010, 2012, 2014,
2016
Undeveloped land
depicted across
roadway
Undeveloped land
depicted across
roadway
Existing
development
depicted
Building structures
depicted across
roadway
2018, 2020 Undeveloped land
depicted across
roadway
Undeveloped land
depicted across
roadway
Existing
development
depicted
Existing
development
depicted

5.3 Historical Topographic Maps
Available topographic maps were reviewed utilizing NETR Online (www.historicaerials.com). The summary of historical maps are discussed in the table below:

Topographic Maps - Subject Property
Year(s) Property Description
1896, 1898, 1901, 1905, 1909,
1913, 1926, 1929, 1936, 1938,
1941, 1946
No structure depicted
1955, 1959, 1960, 1965 Building structures and roadway depicted 1968, 1974, 1980, 1988, 1999 Building structures and unpaved road depicted 2012 Roadway depicted
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment

7.03 acres land with multiple parcels
Fontana, California 92336
23 RSB Project No. 2302252
459
Topographic Maps - Subject Property
Year(s) Property Description
2015, 2018 No structure depicted
Topographic Maps - Surrounding Areas
Year(s) North East West South
1896, 1898, 1901,
1905, 1909, 1913,
1926, 1929, 1936,
1938, 1941, 1946
No structure
depicted
No structure
depicted across
roadway
No structure
depicted
No structure
depicted across
roadway
1955, 1959, 1960,
1965
Roadway depicted No structure
depicted across
roadway
No structure
depicted alongside
and across
roadway
Building structures
and roadway
depicted
1968, 1974 Roadway depicted No structure
depicted across
roadway
Building structure
depicted alongside
and across
roadway
Building structures
and roadway
depicted
1980, 1988, 1999 Roadway depicted Building structure
depicted across
roadway
Building structure
depicted alongside
and across
roadway
Building structures
and roadway
depicted
2012, 2015, 2018 Roadways depicted No structure
depicted across
roadway
No structure
depicted alongside
and across
roadway
No structure
depicted across
roadway

5.4 Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps
Sanborn Maps were originally created for assessing fire insurance liability in urbanized areas throughout the United States. The maps include detailed records regarding town and building information in approximately 12,000 U.S. towns and cities from 1867 to 1970 and have become a valuable tool for historical researchers. From an environmental standpoint, the map collection is a useful aid in documenting historical property developments of environmental concern such as dry-cleaning facilities, gas stations, manufacturing plants, etc.

RSB reviewed the collection of Sanborn Fire insurance maps from Environmental Risk Information Services (ERIS) on February 25, 2023.

Sanborn map coverage was not available for the Subject Property. A copy of the No Coverage Letter is included in Appendix.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment

7.03 acres land with multiple parcels
Fontana, California 92336
24 RSB Project No. 2302252
460

5.5 City Directories
A City Directory Abstract was provided by ERIS and reviewed for past names and businesses that were listed for the Subject Property and adjoining properties. The findings are presented in the following table, and a copy of the City Directory is provided in Historical Research Documentation .

City Directories-Subject Property
Year(s) Property Description
1965, 1971, 1974, 1977, 1982,
1987, 1990, 1996, 2001, 2003,
2008, 2012, 2016, 2020, 2022
Address not listed
City Directories-Surrounding Areas
Year(s) Property Description
North (Address not available)
1965, 1971, 1974, 1977, 1982,
1987, 1990, 1996, 2001, 2003,
2008, 2012, 2016, 2020, 2022
Not applicable
East (16120 South Highland Avenue)
1965, 1971, 1974, 1977, 1982,
1987, 1990, 1996, 2001, 2003,
2008, 2012, 2016, 2020, 2022
Address not listed
West (15891, 15911 South Highland Avenue; 15892 Torrey Avenue) 1965 Sun Rice Market; Wilfong Ernest
1971, 1974, 1977 Lindsay Orzo T; Sunrice Market
1982, 1987 Sunrice Market
1990, 1996 Address not listed
2001 Paelly Murray
2003, 2008, 2012 Address not listed
2016, 2020, 2022 Sunrice Market
South (6571, 6572 Jacaranda Avenue; 6571, 6572 Tokay Avenue; 6571, 6572 Cherimoya Avenue; 6584 Citrus Avenue)
1965, 1971, 1974, 1977, 1982,
1987, 1990, 1996, 2001, 2003,
2008, 2012, 2016, 2020, 2022
Streets not listed

5.6 Prior Assessment Reports
RSB was not provided with prior assessment reports.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment

7.03 acres land with multiple parcels
Fontana, California 92336
25 RSB Project No. 2302252
461

5.7 Additional Historical Records
RSB did not review other historical sources for the Subject Property based on prior use history obtained through the other standard historical sources.

5.8 Interviews
The following persons were interviewed to obtain information regarding recognized environmental conditions in connection with the Subject Property. Additionally, a Pre-Survey Questionnaire was forwarded to the designated Subject Property contact. The Pre-Survey Questionnaire has not been completed or returned to our offices. The information requested in the Pre-Survey Questionnaire is intended to assist in gathering information that may be material to identifying recognized environmental conditions in connection with the Subject Property. The accompanying documentation is presented in Other Supporting Documentation Appendix.

Interviews
Contact Interview Date Pertinent Information or Comments Current Owner
Mr. Jinder Singh February 28, 2023 RSB requested an interview with the subject property owner; however, the subject property
owner has not responded as of this report date. Ms.

Aman Corr informed RSB that Mr. Jinder Singh is
the current property owner. Based on the quality
of information obtained from other sources, this
limitation is not expected to alter the overall
findings of this assessment.

Property Escort
Ms. Aman Corr February 27, 2023 Ms. Aman Corr was interviewed over the telephone and provided general information regarding the
Subject Property. Ms. Aman Corr was not aware
of any environmental concerns on the Subject
Property. RSB was unescorted at the time of the site
visit.

Occupants
Occupants Name and Contact
Details
- No occupants were available to be interviewed as
part of this assessment since the Subject Property is
currently a vacant land.

Previous Owners
Previous Owner's Name and
Contact Details
February 27, 2023 RSB was unable to locate the Subject Property’s former owner at the time of this assessment.

Pertinent information from the interviews are presented in applicable sections of this report.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment

7.03 acres land with multiple parcels
Fontana, California 92336
26 RSB Project No. 2302252
462

5.9 Historical Use Summary
Historical Use Summary
Based on available historical information, the Subject Property was an undeveloped land at least until 1954. Building structures were depicted on the Subject Property since 1955 until at least 1999. The building structures have been demolished and since 2000, the Subject Property has continued to be a vacant land.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment

7.03 acres land with multiple parcels
Fontana, California 92336
27 RSB Project No. 2302252
463

6.0 SUBJECT PROPERTY RECONNAISSANCE

6.1 Methodology and Limiting Conditions
The Subject Property reconnaissance was conducted by Mr. Joseph Landeros, RSB Site Inspector, on February 27, 2023. The weather at the time of the Property visit was Cloudy, 52 Degree Fahrenheit.

The Subject Property reconnaissance consisted of visual and/or physical observations of the Subject Property and improvements, adjoining properties as viewed from the Subject Property boundaries, and the surrounding area based on visual observations made from adjacent public thorough-fares. Building exteriors were observed along the perimeter from the ground, unless described otherwise. Building interiors were observed as they were made safely accessible, unless described otherwise.

6.2 Subject Property Reconnaissance

6.2.1 Subject Property Reconnaissance
Observation Yes No
Hazardous Substance and Petroleum Products in Connection with Identified Uses 
Hazardous Substance and Petroleum Products in Connection with Unidentified Uses 
Drums and Containers of Unidentified Substance or Petroleum Products  Aboveground and Underground Storage Tanks 
Strong, Pungent or Noxious Odors 
Pools of Liquids 
Electrical or Hydraulic Equipment likely to Contain Fluids  Heating and Cooling Source 
Interior Stains or Corrosion other than from Water 
Floor Drains, Sumps, Clarifiers and Oil/Water Separators  Pits, Ponds and Lagoons 
Exterior Stained Soils or Pavement 
Stressed Vegetation 
Onsite Solid Waste Disposal or Unknown Fill 
Wastewater 
Wells 
Septic Systems and Cesspools 
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment

7.03 acres land with multiple parcels
Fontana, California 92336
28 RSB Project No. 2302252
464
Electrical or Hydraulic Equipment likely to Contain Fluids RSB observed one (1) pole-mounted transformer located along the power lines on the subject property.

There were no signs of leak observed near transformer. Based on the observed condition of the transformer, it is unlikely to consider it as an environmental concern.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment

7.03 acres land with multiple parcels
Fontana, California 92336
29 RSB Project No. 2302252
465

6.3 Surrounding Property Reconnaissance

6.3.1 Surrounding Property Reconnaissance
Observation Yes No
Hazardous Substance and Petroleum Products in Connection with Identified Uses 
Hazardous Substance and Petroleum Products in Connection with Unidentified Uses 
Drums and Containers of Unidentified Substance or Petroleum Products  Aboveground and Underground Storage Tanks 
Strong, Pungent or Noxious Odors 
Pools of Liquids 
Electrical or Hydraulic Equipment likely to Contain Fluids  Heating and Cooling Source 
Interior Stains or Corrosion other than from Water 
Floor Drains, Sumps, Clarifiers and Oil/Water Separators  Pits, Ponds and Lagoons 
Exterior Stained Soils or Pavement 
Stressed Vegetation 
Onsite Solid Waste Disposal or Unknown Fill 
Wastewater 
Wells 
Septic Systems and Cesspools 
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment

7.03 acres land with multiple parcels
Fontana, California 92336
30 RSB Project No. 2302252
466

7.0 FINDINGS, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

7.1 Findings and Conclusions
Findings and Conclusions
RSB has performed a Phase I ESA in general conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Standard E1527-13 and E1527-21 for the 7.03 acres land with multiple parcels, Fontana, San Bernardino County, California 92336, the Subject Property. Any exceptions to or deletions from this practice are described in Section 10.0 of this report.

1. This assessment has revealed no evidence of RECs in connection with the Subject Property.

2. This assessment has revealed no evidence of HRECs in connection with the Subject Property.

3. This assessment has revealed no evidence of CRECs in connection with the Subject Property.

4. This assessment has revealed no evidence of BERs in connection with the Subject Property.

De Minimis Environmental Conditions
• RSB did not identify de minimis environmental conditions in connection with the Subject Property.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment

7.03 acres land with multiple parcels
Fontana, California 92336
31 RSB Project No. 2302252
467

7.2 Recommendations
Recommendations
Based on the conclusions, no further actions are recommended.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment

7.03 acres land with multiple parcels
Fontana, California 92336
32 RSB Project No. 2302252
468

8.0 REFERENCES
• American Society for Testing and Materials, Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process, ASTM Designation: E1527-13 and E1527-21.
• Environmental Risk Information Services (ERIS), Database Report, dated February 27, 2023. • Environmental Risk Information Services (ERIS), Physical Setting Report, dated February 25, 2023.
• Environmental Risk Information Services (ERIS), Fire Insurance Maps, dated February 25, 2023. • Environmental Risk Information Services (ERIS), City Directory, dated February 27, 2023. • US Environmental Protection Agency, Map of Radon Zones (www.epa.gov/radon/zonemap.htm) • Federal Emergency. Management Agency, Federal Insurance Administration, National Flood Insurance Program, Flood Insurance Map, Community Panel Number 06071C7915H dated August 28, 2008.
• USGS - 7.5-Minute Topographic Quadrangle of Devore, CA. • San Bernardino County Assessor website: https://arcpropertyinfo.sbcounty.gov/ Phase I Environmental Site Assessment

7.03 acres land with multiple parcels
Fontana, California 92336
33 RSB Project No. 2302252
469

9.0 ASSUMPTIONS, LIMITATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS

9.1 Significant Assumptions
RSB assumes the Subject Property has been correctly identified by the User, designated representative of the User, Subject Property owner or operator, and/or the designated representative of the Subject Property owner or operator. RSB assumes that the User, designated representative of the User, Subject Property owner or operator, and/or the designated representative of the Subject Property owner or operator used good faith in answering questions about and providing information for the Subject Property.

RSB assumes the direction of groundwater is consistent with the contours depicted on the United States Geological Survey (USGS) topographic map covering the Subject Property, unless otherwise specified by actual well data for the Subject Property or properties in the area, or RSB's experience and knowledge of the area.

9.2 Limitations and Exceptions
The findings and conclusions contain all of the limitations inherent in these methodologies that are referred to in ASTM Standard E1527-13 and E1527-21. Specific limitations and exceptions to this ESA are more specifically set forth below:
• RSB only accessed the accessible areas of the Subject Property. • As per the E1527-21, a Significant data gap is defined as a data gap that affects the ability of the environmental professional to identify a recognized environmental condition. No significant data gaps were identified that would affect the ability of the environmental professional to identify recognized environmental conditions in connection with the Subject Property • The scope of work completed was designed solely to meet the needs of RSB's Client. RSB shall not be liable for any unintended usage of this report by another party. Additionally, based on the ASTM Standard Practice, the ESA is only valid if completed within 180 days of an acquisition or the transaction necessitating the ESA, unless updated in accordance with terms outlined within the Standard Practice.
• No ESA can wholly eliminate uncertainty regarding the potential for RECs in connection with a Subject Property. This ESA was designed to reduce but not eliminate uncertainty regarding the existence of such conditions in a manner that recognizes reasonable limits of time and cost. RSB has completed this ESA in accordance with generally accepted consulting practices, and makes no other warranties, either expressed or implied, as to the character and nature of such services or product.
• An ESA is intended to be a non-intrusive investigation and generally does not include sampling or testing of air, soil, water, or building materials. No destructive testing was completed and concealed areas, such as behind walls or within machinery, were not accessed. • Information needed to complete the ESA is based on personal interviews, government records, published resources, and various historical documents. Accuracy and completeness of information varies among information sources and is often inaccurate or incomplete. An environmental professional is not required by the ASTM Standard Practice to verify independently the information provided but may rely on information provided unless the environmental professional has actual knowledge that certain information is incorrect or unless it is obvious that certain information is incorrect based on other information obtained by or otherwise actually known to the environmental professional.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment

7.03 acres land with multiple parcels
Fontana, California 92336
34 RSB Project No. 2302252
470
• RSB shall have no on-going obligation to obtain and include information that was not reasonably ascertainable, practically reviewable, or provided to RSB in a reasonable timeframe to formulate an opinion and complete the assessment by the agreed upon due date. • An ESA includes some information that may be relevant to regulatory compliance but is not intended and shall not be construed as a compliance audit and cannot be considered a verification of regulatory compliance. Depending on its past, present or future intended use, the Subject Property under review may or may not be subject to regulation and permitting under environmental and health and safety laws, such as, but not limited to, the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, the Solid Waste Disposal Act, the Occupational Safety and Health Act, and other federal, state and local regulations. RSB assumes no responsibility or liability respecting regulatory permitting or compliance issues.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment

7.03 acres land with multiple parcels
Fontana, California 92336
35 RSB Project No. 2302252
471

10.0 RELIANCE
All reports, both verbal and written, are for the benefit of Ace Building Company and its successors and assigns. This report has no other purpose and may not be relied upon by any other person or entity without the written consent of RSB.

Ace Building Company may distribute the report to other parties without limitation; however, it is acknowledged that the report provided to third parties is for informational purposes only. RSB will issue a reliance letter if requested.

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment

7.03 acres land with multiple parcels
Fontana, California 92336
36 RSB Project No. 2302252
472
Appendix A
Figures
473
474
475
476
Appendix B
Property Photographs
477

1. Subject property 2. View of Subject Property

3. View of Subject Property 4. View of Subject Property

5. View of Subject Property 6. View of Subject Property 478

7. View of Subject Property 8. View of Subject Property

9. View of Subject Property 10. View of Subject Property

11. Debris 12. Trash
479

13. Pole-mounted transformer 14. West Adjoining Property

15. South Adjacent Property
480
Appendix C
Historical Research Documentation
481
Project Property:

Project No:

Requested By:

Order No:

Date Completed:
2302252_ESA_Fontana Square located in NWC Citrus & S Highland Av NWC Citrus & S Highland Ave
Fontana CA 92336
2302252
RSB Environmental
23022400145
February 25, 2023
Please note that no information was found for your site or adjacent properties. 482
Project Property: 2302252_ESA_Fontana Square located in NWC Citrus & S Highland Ave, Fontana, CA
NWC Citrus & S Highland Ave
Fontana,CA 92336
Project No: 2302252
Requested By: RSB Environmental
Order No: 23022400145
Date Completed: February 27, 2023
483
February 27, 2023
RE: CITY DIRECTORY RESEARCH
NWC Citrus & S Highland Ave
Fontana,CA 92336
Thank you for contacting ERIS for an City Directory Search for the site described above. Our staff has conducted a reverse listing City Directory search to determine prior occupants of the subject site and adjacent properties. We have provided the nearest addresses(s) when adjacent addresses are not listed. If we have searched a range of addresses, all addresses in that range found in the Directory are included.

Note: Reverse Listing Directories generally are focused on more highly developed areas. Newly developed areas may be covered in the more recent years, but the older directories will tend to cover only the "central" parts of the city.To complete the search, we have either utilized the ACPL, Library of Congress, State Archives, and/or a regional library or history center as well as multiple digitized directories.These do not claim to be a complete collection of all reverse listing city directories produced.

ERIS has made every effort to provide accurate and complete information but shall not be held liable for missing, incomplete or inaccurate information.To complete this search we used the general range(s) below to search for relevant findings. If you believe there are additional addresses or streets that require searching please contact us at 866-517-5204.

Search Criteria:
15800-16272 of South Highland Avenue
Search Notes:
484
Search Results Summary
Date Source Comment
2022 DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY
2020 DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY
2016 DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY
2012 DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY
2008 DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY
2003 DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY
2001 HAINES
1996 HAINES
1990 HAINES
1987 HAINES
1982 HAINES
1977 HAINES
1974 HAINES
1971 HAINES
1965 LUSKEYS
485
2022 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVENUE
SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY
2020 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVENUE
SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY
Page: 3
ReportID: 23022400145 - 02/27/2023
www.erisinfo.com
15823 FERNANDO TRUJILLO...RESIDENTIAL
15823 KATA MELE...RESIDENTIAL
15911 SUNRISE MARKET...GROCERS-RETAIL
16272 VALLEY KIA...AUTOMOBILE DEALERS-NEW CARS
15823 DEANNA TRUJILLO...RESIDENTIAL
15911 SUNRISE MARKET...GROCERS-RETAIL
16272 VALLEY KIA...AUTOMOBILE DEALERS-NEW CARS
486
2016 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVENUE
SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY
2012 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVENUE
SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY
Page: 4
ReportID: 23022400145 - 02/27/2023
www.erisinfo.com
15911 SUNRISE MARKET...GROCERS-RETAIL 15833 ROSA HAIAT...RESIDENTIAL 15871 DAISY BAUTISTA...RESIDENTIAL
487
2008 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVENUE
SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY
2003 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVENUE
SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY
Page: 5
ReportID: 23022400145 - 02/27/2023
www.erisinfo.com
15861 TRINITY INVESTIGATIONS...INVESTIGATORS
15861 TRINITY INVESTIGATIONS...DET, ARMORED CAR SV
15861 TRINITY INVESTIGATIONS
488
2001 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVENUE
SOURCE: HAINES
1996 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVENUE
SOURCE: HAINES
Page: 6
ReportID: 23022400145 - 02/27/2023
www.erisinfo.com
489
1990 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVENUE
SOURCE: HAINES
1987 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVENUE
SOURCE: HAINES
Page: 7
ReportID: 23022400145 - 02/27/2023
www.erisinfo.com
490
1982 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVENUE
SOURCE: HAINES
1977 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVENUE
SOURCE: HAINES
Page: 8
ReportID: 23022400145 - 02/27/2023
www.erisinfo.com
491
1974 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVENUE
SOURCE: HAINES
1971 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVENUE
SOURCE: HAINES
Page: 9
ReportID: 23022400145 - 02/27/2023
www.erisinfo.com
492
1965 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVENUE
SOURCE:LUSKEYS
Page: 10
ReportID: 23022400145 - 02/27/2023
www.erisinfo.com
493
Appendix D
Regulatory Records Documentation
494
Project Property: 2302252_ESA_Fontana Square located in NWC Citrus & S Highland Ave, Fontana, CA
NWC Citrus & S Highland Ave
Fontana CA 92336
Project No: 2302252
Report Type: Database Report
Order No: 23022400145
Requested by: RSB Environmental
Date Completed: February 27, 2023
495
2 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23022400145 h-Table of Contents
Notice: IMPORTANT LIMITATIONS and YOUR LIABILITY
Reliance on information in Report: This report DOES NOT replace a full Phase I Environmental Site Assessment but is solely intended to be used as database review of environmental records.

License for use of information in Report: No page of this report can be used without this cover page, this notice and the project property identifier.

The information in Report(s) may not be modified or re-sold.

Your Liability for misuse: Using this Service and/or its reports in a manner contrary to this Notice or your agreement will be in breach of copyright and contract and ERIS may obtain damages for such mis-use, including damages caused to third parties, and gives ERIS the right to terminate your account, rescind your license to any previous reports and to bar you from future use of the Service.

No warranty of Accuracy or Liability for ERIS: The information contained in this report has been produced by ERIS Information Inc. ("ERIS") using various sources of information, including information provided by Federal and State government departments. The report applies only to the address and up to the date specified on the cover of this report, and any alterations or deviation from this description will require a new report. This report and the data contained herein does not purport to be and does not constitute a guarantee of the accuracy of the information contained herein and does not constitute a legal opinion nor medical advice. Although ERIS has endeavored to present you with information that is accurate, ERIS disclaims, any and all liability for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in such information and data, whether attributable to inadvertence, negligence or otherwise, and for any consequences arising therefrom. Liability on the part of ERIS is limited to the monetary value paid for this report.

Trademark and Copyright: You may not use the ERIS trademarks or attribute any work to ERIS other than as outlined above. This Service and Report (s) are protected by copyright owned by ERIS Information Inc. Copyright in data used in the Service or Report(s) (the "Data") is owned by ERIS or its licensors. The Service, Report(s) and Data may not be copied or reproduced in whole or in any substantial part without prior written consent of ERIS.

Table of Contents
Table of Contents...........................................................................................2 Executive Summary........................................................................................3 Executive Summary: Report Summary.......................................................................................................................4 Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Project Property...................................................................................9 Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Surrounding Properties......................................................................10 Executive Summary: Summary by Data Source.......................................................................................................15 Map...............................................................................................................22 Aerial.............................................................................................................25 Topographic Map..........................................................................................26 Detail Report.................................................................................................27 Unplottable Summary.................................................................................106 Unplottable Report......................................................................................107 Appendix: Database Descriptions...............................................................114 Definitions...................................................................................................131 496
3 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23022400145 h-Executive Summary
Property Information:

Project Property: 2302252_ESA_Fontana Square located in NWC Citrus & S Highland Ave, Fontana, CA NWC Citrus & S Highland Ave Fontana CA 92336
Project No: 2302252
Coordinates:

Latitude: 34.13529279
Longitude: -117.45575148
UTM Northing: 3,777,250.92
UTM Easting: 457,979.02
UTM Zone: UTM Zone 11S
Elevation: 1,506 FT
Order Information:

Order No: 23022400145
Date Requested: February 24, 2023
Requested by: RSB Environmental
Report Type: Database Report
Historicals/Products:

City Directory Search CD - 1 Street Search
ERIS Xplorer ERIS Xplorer
Excel Add-On Excel Add-On
Fire Insurance Maps US Fire Insurance Maps
Physical Setting Report (PSR) Physical Setting Report (PSR) Vapor Screening Tool Vapor Screening Tool
Executive Summary
497
4 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23022400145 h-Executive Summary: Report Summary
Database Searched Search
Radius
Project
Property
Within

0.12mi

0.125mi
to 0.25mi

0.25mi to

0.50mi

0.50mi to

1.00mi
Total
Standard Environmental Records
Federal
rr-DOE FUSRAP-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

rr-NPL-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

rr-PROPOSED NPL-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

rr-DELETED NPL-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-SEMS-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-ODI-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-SEMS ARCHIVE-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-CERCLIS-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-IODI-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-CERCLIS NFRAP-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-CERCLIS LIENS-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0

rr-RCRA CORRACTS-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

rr-RCRA TSD-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 1 - 1

rr-RCRA LQG-aa Y 0.25 0 0 2 - - 2

rr-RCRA SQG-aa Y 0.25 0 0 2 - - 2

rr-RCRA VSQG-aa Y 0.25 0 0 1 - - 1

rr-RCRA NON GEN-aa Y 0.25 0 1 11 - - 12

rr-RCRA CONTROLS-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-FED ENG-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-FED INST-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-LUCIS-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-NPL IC-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-ERNS 1982 TO 1986-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0

rr-ERNS 1987 TO 1989-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0

rr-ERNS-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0

rr-FED BROWNFIELDS-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-FEMA UST-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

DOE FUSRAP
NPL

PROPOSED NPL

DELETED NPL
SEMS
ODI

SEMS ARCHIVE

CERCLIS
IODI

CERCLIS NFRAP

CERCLIS LIENS

RCRA CORRACTS

RCRA TSD

RCRA LQG

RCRA SQG

RCRA VSQG

RCRA NON GEN

RCRA CONTROLS

FED ENG

FED INST
LUCIS
NPL IC
ERNS 1982 TO 1986
ERNS 1987 TO 1989
ERNS

FED BROWNFIELDS

FEMA UST
Executive Summary: Report Summary
498
5 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23022400145 Database Searched Search
Radius
Project
Property
Within

0.12mi

0.125mi
to 0.25mi

0.25mi to

0.50mi

0.50mi to

1.00mi
Total
rr-FRP-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

rr-DELISTED FRP-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

rr-HIST GAS STATIONS-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

rr-REFN-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

rr-BULK TERMINAL-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

rr-SEMS LIEN-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0

rr-SUPERFUND ROD-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

State
rr-RESPONSE-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

rr-ENVIROSTOR-aa Y 1 0 0 0 1 3 4

rr-DELISTED ENVS-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

rr-SWF/LF-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-SWRCB SWF-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-WMUD-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-HWP-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

rr-SWAT-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-C&D DEBRIS RECY-aa Y 0.5 0 0 2 0 - 2

rr-RECYCLING-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-PROCESSORS-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-CONTAINER RECY-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-LDS-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-LUST-aa Y 0.5 0 1 0 0 - 1

rr-DELISTED LST-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-UST-aa Y 0.25 0 1 0 - - 1

rr-UST CLOSURE-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-HHSS-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

rr-UST SWEEPS-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

rr-AST-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

rr-AST SWRCB-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

rr-TANK OIL GAS-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

rr-DELISTED TNK-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

rr-CERS TANK-aa Y 0.25 0 1 1 - - 2

rr-DELISTED CTNK-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

rr-HIST TANK-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

FRP

DELISTED FRP

HIST GAS STATIONS
REFN

BULK TERMINAL

SEMS LIEN

SUPERFUND ROD

RESPONSE

ENVIROSTOR

DELISTED ENVS
SWF/LF

SWRCB SWF
WMUD
HWP
SWAT

C&D DEBRIS RECY

RECYCLING

PROCESSORS

CONTAINER RECY
LDS
LUST

DELISTED LST
UST

UST CLOSURE
HHSS

UST SWEEPS
AST

AST SWRCB

TANK OIL GAS

DELISTED TNK

CERS TANK

DELISTED CTNK

HIST TANK
499
6 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23022400145 Database Searched Search
Radius
Project
Property
Within

0.12mi

0.125mi
to 0.25mi

0.25mi to

0.50mi

0.50mi to

1.00mi
Total
rr-LUR-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-CALSITES-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-HLUR-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-DEED-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-VCP-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-CLEANUP SITES-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-DELISTED CLEANUP-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-DELISTED COUNTY-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

Tribal
rr-INDIAN LUST-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-INDIAN UST-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

rr-DELISTED INDIAN LST-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-DELISTED INDIAN UST-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

County
rr-SANBERN CUPA-aa Y 0.25 0 6 6 - - 12

Additional Environmental Records
Federal
rr-FINDS/FRS-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0

rr-TRIS-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0

rr-PFAS TRI-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-PFAS FED SITES-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-PFAS NPL-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-PFAS WATER-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-PFAS SSEHRI-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-ERNS PFAS-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-HMIRS-aa Y 0.125 0 0 - - - 0

rr-NCDL-aa Y 0.125 0 0 - - - 0

rr-TSCA-aa Y 0.125 0 0 - - - 0

rr-HIST TSCA-aa Y 0.125 0 0 - - - 0

rr-FTTS ADMIN-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0

rr-FTTS INSP-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0

rr-PRP-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0

rr-SCRD DRYCLEANER-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-ICIS-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0

LUR

CALSITES
HLUR
DEED
VCP

CLEANUP SITES

DELISTED CLEANUP

DELISTED COUNTY

INDIAN LUST

INDIAN UST

DELISTED INDIAN LST

DELISTED INDIAN UST

SANBERN CUPA

FINDS/FRS
TRIS

PFAS TRI

PFAS FED SITES

PFAS NPL

PFAS WATER

PFAS SSEHRI

ERNS PFAS
HMIRS
NCDL
TSCA

HIST TSCA

FTTS ADMIN

FTTS INSP
PRP

SCRD DRYCLEANER
ICIS
500
7 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23022400145 Database Searched Search
Radius
Project
Property
Within

0.12mi

0.125mi
to 0.25mi

0.25mi to

0.50mi

0.50mi to

1.00mi
Total
rr-FED DRYCLEANERS-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

rr-DELISTED FED DRY-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

rr-FUDS-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 1 1

rr-FORMER NIKE-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

rr-PIPELINE INCIDENT-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0

rr-MLTS-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0

rr-HIST MLTS-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0

rr-MINES-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

rr-SMCRA-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

rr-MRDS-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

rr-LM SITES-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

rr-ALT FUELS-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

rr-CONSENT DECREES-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

rr-AFS-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0

rr-SSTS-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

rr-PCBT-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-PCB-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

State
rr-DRYCLEANERS-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

rr-DELISTED DRYCLEANERS-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

rr-DRYC GRANT-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

rr-PFAS-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-PFAS GW-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-HWSS CLEANUP-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-TOXIC PITS-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

rr-DTSC HWF-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-INSP COMP ENF-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

rr-SCH-aa Y 1 0 0 0 1 2 3

rr-CHMIRS-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0

rr-HIST CHMIRS-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0

rr-HAZNET-aa Y PO 2 - - - - 2

rr-HAZ GEN-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0

rr-HAZ TSD-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-HIST MANIFEST-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0

rr-HW TRANSPORT-aa Y 0.125 0 0 - - - 0

FED DRYCLEANERS

DELISTED FED DRY
FUDS

FORMER NIKE

PIPELINE INCIDENT
MLTS

HIST MLTS
MINES
SMCRA
MRDS

LM SITES

ALT FUELS

CONSENT DECREES
AFS
SSTS
PCBT
PCB

DRYCLEANERS

DELISTED DRYCLEANERS

DRYC GRANT
PFAS

PFAS GW

HWSS CLEANUP

TOXIC PITS

DTSC HWF

INSP COMP ENF
SCH
CHMIRS

HIST CHMIRS
HAZNET

HAZ GEN

HAZ TSD

HIST MANIFEST

HW TRANSPORT
501
8 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23022400145 Database Searched Search
Radius
Project
Property
Within

0.12mi

0.125mi
to 0.25mi

0.25mi to

0.50mi

0.50mi to

1.00mi
Total
rr-WASTE TIRE-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0

rr-MEDICAL WASTE-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

rr-HIST CORTESE-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-CDO/CAO-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-CERS HAZ-aa Y 0.125 0 3 - - - 3

rr-DELISTED HAZ-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-GEOTRACKER-aa Y 0.125 0 0 - - - 0

rr-MINE-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

rr-LIEN-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0

rr-WASTE DISCHG-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

rr-EMISSIONS-aa Y 0.25 0 2 0 - - 2

rr-CDL-aa Y 0.125 0 0 - - - 0

Tribal No Tribal additional environmental record sources available for this State.

County
rr-MED WST SANBERN-aa Y 0.25 0 1 3 - - 4

Total: 2 16 28 3 6 55
* PO – Property Only
* 'Property and adjoining properties' database search radii are set at 0.25 miles.

WASTE TIRE

MEDICAL WASTE

HIST CORTESE

CDO/CAO

CERS HAZ

DELISTED HAZ

GEOTRACKER
MINE
LIEN

WASTE DISCHG

EMISSIONS
CDL

MED WST SANBERN
502
9 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23022400145 h-Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Project Property Map
Key
DB Company/Site Name Address Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev Diff
(ft)
Page
Number
m1d dd-HAZNET-826196388-aa THE ARTITECTS 16052 TORREY AVE FONTANA CA 923360000
E 0.00 / 0.00 3 p1p-27-826196388-x1x
m1d dd-HAZNET-826395461-aa HUD/FEDERAL 16052 TORREY AVE FONTANA CA 923360000
E 0.00 / 0.00 3 p1p-27-826395461-x1x
27 27
1 1
HAZNET
HAZNET
Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Project Property 503
10 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23022400145 h-Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Surrounding Properties Map
Key
DB Company/Site Name Address Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev Diff
(ft)
Page
Number
m2d dd-SANBERN CUPA-820060597-aa FONTANA LANDMARK,
INC.
6599 Citrus AVE
FONTANA CA 92336
ESE 0.07 /
381.56
-5 p1p-27-820060597-x1x
m2d dd-UST-860397571-aa FONTANA LANDMARK,
INC.
6599 Citrus Ave
fontana CA 92336
ESE 0.07 /
381.56
-5 p1p-28-860397571-x1x
Facility ID: FA0011396
Tank ID No. | Tank Status | Tank Closure Date: 2 | Renewal Permit | , 1 | Renewal Permit | , 3 | Renewal Permit |
m2d dd-EMISSIONS-861212517-aa MIRA INC 6599 CITRUS AVE
FONTANA CA 92336
ESE 0.07 /
381.56
-5 p1p-29-861212517-x1x
m2d dd-CERS TANK-864889526-aa FONTANA LANDMARK,
INC.
6599 CITRUS AVE
FONTANA CA 92336
ESE 0.07 /
381.56
-5 p1p-30-864889526-x1x
Site ID: 49331
m2d dd-EMISSIONS-867299782-aa FONTANA LANDMARK
INC
6599 CITRUS AVE
FONTANA CA 92336
ESE 0.07 /
381.56
-5 p1p-45-867299782-x1x
m2d dd-RCRA NON GEN-873985252-aa FONTANA LANDMARK
INC
6599 CITRUS AVE
FONTANA CA 92336
ESE 0.07 /
381.56
-5 p1p-45-873985252-x1x
EPA Handler ID: CAL000381496
m3d dd-MED WST SANBERN-912491147-aa CARBON HEALTH 16164 S HIGHLAND FONTANA CA 92336
ESE 0.10 /
515.92
-2 p1p-46-912491147-x1x
m4d dd-SANBERN CUPA-820062859-aa AT&T Mobility - FONTANA (USID82549)
6428 Catawba Ave
Fontana CA 92336
NW 0.10 /
535.65
12 p1p-46-820062859-x1x
m4d dd-SANBERN CUPA-822919320-aa American Towers, Site
#274465 Fontana-Citrus
6428 Catawba Ave
Fontana CA 92336
NW 0.10 /
535.65
12 p1p-47-822919320-x1x
m4d dd-SANBERN CUPA-858216607-aa Verizon Wireless: Cooper 6428 Catawba Ave Fontana CA 92336
NW 0.10 /
535.65
12 p1p-47-858216607-x1x
m4d dd-CERS HAZ-864927835-aa Verizon Wireless: Cooper 6428 CATAWBA AVE FONTANA CA 92336
NW 0.10 /
535.65
12 p1p-48-864927835-x1x
m4d dd-CERS HAZ-864942127-aa AT&T Mobility - FONTANA
(USID82549)
6428 CATAWBA AVE
FONTANA CA 92336
NW 0.10 /
535.65
12 p1p-49-864942127-x1x
27 28
29 30
45 45
46 46
47 47
48 49
2 2
2 2
2 2
3 4
4 4
4 4

SANBERN
CUPA
UST