Exhibit M - Environmental Assessment No. T-6502/P24-04526/P24-04527/P25-00027 [7-16-2025] — Fresno City Council, August 14, 2025 (part 3 of 8)

COMMISSIONER
Isaac Bojorquez
Ohlone-Costanoan
Pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21080.3.1 (c), attached is a consultation list of tribes that are traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of the above-listed project. Please note that the intent of the AB 52 amendments to CEQA is to avoid and/or mitigate impacts to tribal cultural resources, (Pub. Resources Code §21084.3 (a)) (“Public agencies shall, when feasible, avoid damaging effects to any tribal cultural resource.”) Within 14 days of determining that an application for a project is complete or a decision by a public agency to undertake a project, the lead agency shall provide formal notification to the designated contact of, or a tribal representative of, traditionally and culturally affiliated California Native American tribes that have requested notice, which shall be accomplished by means of at least one written notification that includes a brief description of the proposed project and its location, the lead agency contact information, and a notification that the California Native American tribe has 30 days to request consultation pursuant to this section.

Re: Native American Tribal Consultation, Pursuant to the Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52), Amendments to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Chapter 532, Statutes of 2014), Public Resources Code Sections 5097.94 (m), 21073, 21074, 21080.3.1, 21080.3.2, 21082.3, 21083.09, 21084.2 and 21084.3, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6502 (Blossom View) (230286) Project, Fresno County

1. The results of any record search that may have been conducted at an Information Center of the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS), including, but not limited to:

The AB 52 amendments to CEQA law does not preclude initiating consultation with the tribes that are culturally and traditionally affiliated within your jurisdiction prior to receiving requests for notification of projects in the tribe’s areas of traditional and cultural affiliation. The Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) recommends, but does not require, early consultation as a best practice to ensure that lead agencies receive sufficient information about cultural resources in a project area to avoid damaging effects to tribal cultural resources.

Public Resources Code sections 21080.3.1 and 21084.3(c) require CEQA lead agencies to consult with California Native American tribes that have requested notice from such agencies of proposed projects in the geographic area that are traditionally and culturally affiliated with the tribes on projects for which a Notice of Preparation or Notice of Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration has been filed on or after July 1, 2015. Specifically, Public Resources Code section 21080.3.1 (d) provides:

COMMISSIONER
Laurena Bolden
Serrano
The NAHC also recommends, but does not require that agencies should also include with their notification letters, information regarding any cultural resources assessment that has been completed on the area of potential effect (APE), such as:

ACTING EXECUTIVE

SECRETARY

STEVEN QUINN

PARLIAMENTARIAN
Wayne Nelson
Luiseho

COMMISSIONER
Stanley Rodriguez
Kum eyaay

COMMISSIONER
Reid Milanovich
Cahuilla
Jaymie Brauer
QK, Inc.

VICE-CHAIRPERSON
Buffy McQuillen
Yokayo Pom o, Yuki,
Nom laki

COMMISSIONER
Bennae Calac
Pauma-Yuima Band of
Luiseho Indians

CHAIRPERSON
Reginald Pagaling
Chum ash

NAHC HEADQUARTERS
1550 Harbor Boulevard
Suite 100
West Sacramento,
Califomia 95691
(916) 373-3710
nahc9nahc.ca.aov

SECRETARY
Sara Dutschke
Miwok
n

1. °
25 2. The results of any archaeological inventory survey that was conducted, including:

Any report that may contain site forms, site significance, and suggested mitigation measures.

4. Any ethnographic studies conducted for any area including all or part of the APE; and

5. Any geotechnical reports regarding all or part of the APE.

If you have any questions, please contact me at my email address: [email protected] Sincerely,
Attachment

Page 2 of 2 ends

If you receive notification of change of addresses and phone numbers from tribes, please notify the NAHC. With your assistance, we can assure that our consultation list remains current.

Melina Carlos
Cultural Resources Analyst

3. The result of the Sacred Lands File (SLF) check conducted through the Native American Heritage Commission was negative.

Lead agencies should be aware that records maintained by the NAHC and CHRIS are not exhaustive and a negative response to these searches does not preclude the existence of a tribal cultural resource. A tribe may be the only source of information regarding the existence of a tribal cultural resource.

This information will aid tribes in determining whether to request formal consultation. In the event that they do, having the information beforehand will help to facilitate the consultation process.

A listing of any and all known cultural resources that have already been recorded on or adjacent to the APE, such as known archaeological sites;
Copies of any and all cultural resource records and study reports that may have been provided by the Information Center as part of the records search response; Whether the records search indicates a low, moderate, or high probability that unrecorded cultural resources are located in the APE; and
if a survey is recommended by the Information Center to determine whether previously unrecorded cultural resources are present.

All information regarding site locations, Native American human remains, and associated funerary objects should be in a separate confidential addendum, and not be made available for public disclosure in accordance with Government Code section 6254.10.

Tribe Name Fed (F) Contact Contact Address Phone # Counties Fresno Amah Mutsun Tribal Band N (916) 743-5633 [email protected] 7/20/2023 Amah Mutsun Tribal Band N (530) 578-3864 [email protected] 7/20/2023 N (626) 339-6785 [email protected]
Northern Valley Yokut/ Ohlone Tribe N (209) 662-2788 [email protected] 11/21/2023 Northern Valley Yokut / Ohlone Tribe N (209) 649-8972 can utes@ verizon. net 4/30/2024 (559)412-5590 Foothill Yokut Fresno,Madera,Mariposa,Merced,Tuolumne 12/12/2023 F (559) 795-5986 [email protected] Yokut Fresno, Madera, Mariposa, Merced,Tuolumne 6/20/2023 Table Mountain Rancheria F (559) 822-2587 [email protected] Yokut 12/21/2023 Tule River Indian Tribe F Neil Peyron, Chairperson (559) 781-4271 Yokut N (831)443-9702 [email protected] 6/19/2023
This list is only applicable for consultation with Native American tribes under Public Resources Code Sections 21080.3.1 for the proposed Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6502 (Blossom View) (230286) Project, Fresno County.

Timothy Perez, Tribal
Compliance Officer
1179 Rock Haven Ct
Salinas, CA, 93906
Valentin Lopez,
Chairperson
Cou
nty
T racey Hopkins,
Chairperson
Katherine Perez,
Chairperson
P.O. Box 410
Friant, CA, 93626
P.O. Box 5272
Gat, CA, 95632
P.O. Box 717
Linden, CA, 95236
P.O. Box 717
Linden, CA, 95236
Picayune Rancheria of the
Chukchansi Indians
Picayune Rancheria of the
Chukchansi Indians
Kenneth Woodrow,
Chairperson
P.O. Box 2226
Oakhurst, CA, 93644
P.O. Box 2226
Oakhurst, CA, 93644
Kianemuk & Yowlumne Tejon
Indians
Last
Updated
council@@chukchansinsn.gov
Wuksachi Indian Tribe/Eshom
Valley Band
Fresno, Kern, Kings, Madera, Monterey,San Benito, San
Luis Obispo,Tulare
Ed Ketchum, ViceChairperson
Delia Dominguez,
Chairperson
nei. peyron @tu le rivertribensn.gov
Costanoan
Northern Valley Yokut
Costanoan
Northern Valley Yokut
Costanoan
Northern Valley Yokut
P.O. Box 589
Portervile, CA, 93258
115 Radio Street
Bakersfield, CA, 93305
Foothill Yokut
Mono
Non-Fed Person
(N)
Heather Airey, Tnbal
Historic Preservation
Officer
Michele Heredia-Cordova,
Chairperson
Alameda, Calaveras, Contra
Costa, Fresno, M adera, M ariposa, Merced, Sacramento, Sa n Bento,San Joaquin,Santa Clara,Solano,Stanislaus
Alameda, Calaveras, Contra
Costa, Fresno, M adera, M ariposa, Merced, Sacramento, Sa n Bento,San Joaquin,Santa Clara,Solano,Stanislaus
Costanoan
Northern Valley Yokut
Kitanemuk
Southern Valley Yokut
Alameda, Calaveras, Contra
Costa, Fresno, M adera, M ariposa, Merced, Monterey, San Bento,San Francisco,San Joaquin,San Mateo,Santa
Alameda, Calaveras, Contra
Costa, Fresno, M adera, M ariposa, Merced, Monterey, San Fresno, Kern, Kings,Los Angeles, Madera, Monterey,San
Benito, San Luis Obispo,Tulare
Record: PROJ-2025-000179
Report Type: AB52 GIS
Counties: Fresno
NAHC Group: Al
Alameda, Amador, Calaveras, Contra
Costa,Fresno,Inyo,Kern,Kings,Madera,Mariposa,Merce
d,Monterey,Sacramento,San Bento,San Joaquin,San
Alameda, Calaveras, Contra
Costa, Fresno, I nyo, Kings, M adera, M ann, M anposa, Merc ed,Mono,Monterey,San Benito,San Francisco,San
This list is current only as of the date of this document Distribution of this list does not relieve any person of statutory responsibility as defined in Section 7050.5 of the Heath and Safety Code, Section 5097.94 of the Pubic Resources Code and Section 5097.98 of the Pubic Resources Code.

Email Address Cultural
Affiliation
Native American Heritage Commission
Native American Contact List
Fresno County
1/13/2025
F

Attachment C
Field Survey Report
ASM Project Number: 30430.28
31 January 2024
Jaymie Brauer
QK
5080 California Ave., Suite 400
Bakersfield, CA 93309
RE: Due Diligence Study, McKinley/Temperance Property (APN 310-052-27), Fresno County, California
Dear Jaymie Brauer:

This letter documents completion of a due diligence survey for a McKinley/Temperance Property (APN 310-052-27). This study was conducted in advance of the potential purchase of the property.

Prior survey work on the parcel revealed that potential pre-contact cultural resources might be located at the property. The Project study area is situated east of the city of Fresno, in Fresno County, California (Figure 1). Specifically, the study area is located in Section 26 (T13S/R21E; MDBM). The study area, which consists of the entire property, is approximately 20-acres (ac).

This study was conducted by ASM Affiliates to assist in due diligence prior to the purchase of the property. Peter A. Carey, M.A. RPA, served as Principal Investigator.

In summary, the results of a records search conducted by staff at the Southern San Joaquin Valley Information Center (SSJVIC), California State University, Bakersfield, show that two previous studies have been conducted within the study area, and that no cultural resources are known to exist within it. A small residential property occupies the northern 5-ac of the property. During the field survey, the tenant’s son (Macko) showed ASM crew potential cultural artifacts collected on the property, only one of which could be definitively identified as a granitic milling slab. There was no context to the find and a survey of the 5-ac residential property did not reveal any archaeological indicators (e.g., midden, other artifacts). An intensive pedestrian survey of the entire 20-ac study area by ASM qualified archaeologists did not identify any cultural resources.

Method of Study
Records Search
A records search completed at the Southern San Joaquin Valley Information Center (SSJVIC), California State University, Bakersfield, in 2022 that covered the current study area was utilized for this study. The records search review was completed in order to determine whether the study area had been previously surveyed for cultural resources, and/or whether any such resources were known to exist on it. The records search was completed to determine: (i) if prehistoric or historical archaeological sites had previously been recorded within the study area; (ii) if the project area had been systematically surveyed by archaeologists prior to the initiation of this field study; and/or (iii) whether the region of the field project was known to contain archaeological sites and to thereby ASM
Archaeology • History • Ethnography • Architectural History affiliates
Corporate: 2034 Corte Del Nogal, Carlsbad, CA 92011 • O: (760) 804-5757 • F: (760) 804-5755 4800 Stockdale Hwy., Suite 405, Bakersfield, CA 93309 • C: (661) 237-0109 • [email protected] www.asmaffiliates.com
1/31/2024
Jaymie Brauer

Page 2 of 8 ends

be archaeologically sensitive. Records examined included archaeological site files and maps, the National Register of Historic Places, Historic Property Data File, California Inventory of Historic Resources, and the California Points of Historic Interest.

According to the IC records, two previous studies had been conducted in the study area (Table 1; see Figure 2), and no cultural resources are known to exist within it. An additional five previous studies had been conducted within 0.5-miles (mi) of the study area (Table 2; Figure 2) resulting in the recordation of two cultural resources within that same radius (Table 3; Figure 2).

Table 1 Previous Reports in the Study Area
Report No. Year Author (s)/Affiliation Title
FR-00548 1987
Meighan, Clement,
Dillon, Brian, Verano,
John, and Indermill,
Roc/UCLA
Redbank and Fancher Creeks Intensive Cultural Resources Survey, Fresno County, California
FR-01130 1975
Wren, Donald G. and
Crist, Michael/Individual
Consultant
Archaeological Reconnaissance of the Redbank and Fancher Creek Investigation Area
Table 2. Previous Reports within 0.5-miles of the Study Area Report No. Year Author (s)/Affiliation Title
FR-00448 1991
Sutton, Mark Q./
California State
University, Bakersfield
An Archaeological Assessment of Six Acres Southeast of Clovis, Fresno County, California
FR-01994 2003
Losee, Carolyn/
Archaeological
Resources Technology
Cultural Resources Analysis for Cingular CC527-01 Site in Fresno FR-02629 2012 Travers, Aniela/ EBI
Consulting
Archaeological Sensitivity Assessment Ensite #11227
(250035)/Temperance 7101 E. McKinley Avenue, Fresno, Fresno County, California
FR-03008 2019 Peak, Melinda A./ Peak
& Associates, Inc.

Cultural Resource Assessment for the Floradora-Armstrong Reorganization-Annexation Area and Tentative Tract 6201 and Tract 6235 Developments, Fresno County California
FR-03014 2019 Peak, Melinda A./ Peak
& Associates, Inc.

Cultural Resource Assessment for the Meadowood II Tract 6281 Development, Fresno County California
Table 3. Previous Resources within 0.5-miles of the Study Area Primary # Type Description
P-10-002189 Site Prehistoric – 21 manos, 3 mano frags, 2 metate, and 1 metate frag
P-10-005363 Building Residence
1/31/2024
Jaymie Brauer

Page 3 of 8 ends

Field Survey
An intensive Phase I survey of the 20-ac study area was conducted on 24 January 2024 by ASM Associate Archaeologist Robert Azpitarte, B.A. and ASM Assistant Archaeologist Margarita Medina Lemus, B.A. The entire parcel was surveyed at 15-m intervals, including the northern 5- ac accommodating residential buildings after permission was granted.

The property around the main house has been heavily disturbed. A paved, tree-lined driveway bisects the property and leads directly to the residential property at the north end. The residential property is located on an obvious 10-ft rise above the rest of the 20-ac property. The property contains a number of planted trees and plants and is bordered on the north and northwest by a riprap-lined canal. The 20-ac parcel was covered in sparse grasses, but visibility was generally good (Figure 3,4, 5, and 6).

During the field survey, the tenant’s son (Macko) showed ASM crew potential cultural artifacts collected on the property, only one of which could be definitively identified as a granitic milling slab (Figure 7). The area in which the milling slab was said to be found now contains planted trees/saplings and did not contain any archaeological indicators (e.g., midden, other artifacts).

An intensive survey of the 20-ac property, including the 5-ac residential portion, did not reveal any cultural resources.

Study Results and Recommendations
No cultural resources of any kind were identified as a result of the intensive pedestrian survey conducted as part of this due diligence study for the McKinley/Temperance property.

Additional work which would be required for this study to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act would include a full recordation of the residential property at the north end of the parcel, including an architectural history evaluation.

Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions.

Sincerely,
Peter A. Carey, M.A., RPA
Director
/kl
1/31/2024
Jaymie Brauer

Page 4 of 8 ends

Figure 1. Location of QK APN 310-052-27 Development Study Area, Fresno County, California.
8 MC»KINLEY * W 35/ •
SA NTA^. re. f
o,rCH
I
AND*

TEMPERANCE
Pe
l
I
I
I
1 I
Study Area
i
■ .1: '
. SHIELDS BDY 135/
1 354
| T .
4 A
=5539.’ OL/YE ...345 — Well
Wdl
34;
135,
1 i
...
25i
—
AVE 350
Oc.,
AVE
■ '
. -36
• )
%(
SOULD
well.
358^
• “
A VE 1.356
II
(
k
i»*
. 0"
--
—jt
! Wei! I*|.

I
4244
AVE
34 tv
351
48 bAKOT^^
¥
-3505 :
02342 CORPORATE
■ I
I
II
336
.L

I FLQRADO'RA
J.1334 338,
L _ARVEY
I'
^33
L
I
I
I
Dl TCH J
~ATC^IsdN':

Temperance-K utner
Sch
| ।
__ ;839
.
77 - AVE pV
‘c.

T13S R21E ‘ ss

2. 1 7
■ Clovis USGS 7.5' Quad
- .7 u
" CREEK Fi EL MON 7 - ll. F
AVE
===fh
P id -e
V- - Well. ।'ll m
•I Belmont
s Country Club tl .
r
I
|
il •
Malaga USGS 7.51 Quad
T14S R21E
g
ASM 5P
Archaeology • History • Ethnography • Architectural History cliflif=it==.R2NALZ affiliates 1:24,000

0.5 0.85

0.25 0.425
0 0
I Miles
ml kilometers
Legend
-I Study Area
□ USGS 7.5'Quad
I__ _ Township and Range
APN 310-052-27 Project Study Area
Fresno County. California
Quad Knopf, Inc. 6 WOLF
to
_ TEMPERANCE i " - T
0 m
i
SKI LQCAN.
1O

0. f
I
A VE
M
0 2
I
1 s
p
.1.

LEONARD
O
D

ARMSTRONG
if J 7A^OJ
1/31/2024
Jaymie Brauer

Page 5 of 8 ends

Figure 2. Previous reports and resources map, Fresno County, California. 35/
|
■ V 35, . GOULD 56
A VE
T i
y '
!
2 II
350
O 2
414
t
CORPORATE346 _ SH/ELDS BDY 135/ • si Si
'J
_ AVE-- 1,356
1 . =1354 = - 356 •: I
| ■r
FR-03014
2727 LDOOEAO/ £339 E
:.349] FR-00548
20 Q FR-01130 XR FR-01130
I FR-01130' FR-01994
r •ii • 336 II —PeL—Burn 135/ ' 21 AVE 350 SANTAUFE. 7
FR-02629 | Study Area J
5 I FLORADORA'
I
FR-00448 P-10-005363
FR-03008 I
338’1 7339/
tv — AVE . '36
Temperance-Kutner
Sch C,L ■
—
pY, - AVEcP
T13S R21E — so
U • I I
:=
Clovis USGS 7.5' Quad i L. (■REEK
j d BELMONT 5o 46 AME
Malaga USGS 7.5! Quad if
T14S R21E I 0c1h• F’e—l d
•II Well.
1 I
.345
Well
Well
358
I
I
I
I
Well
34;
A
c
Z/ 0
2 o
K
Q (
v
II1.
i
II
s P-10-002189
PITCH

ATCHISON-
- - _
TOPE 1 « '"I?
" *6
w |
D|

2. • .334
AND'
’.RANCE
| Belmont :
1 Country Club . i
——F . .
k 3^8 bAKOTJ
u >
S
I
!
J jOLryE
-AA
weli 35i ।
1 34?
I • 90" 18-
1 i
i__
10,
/
FR-03008
3 ----13
..
0 0.25 0.5
Miles
0 0.425 0.85 1:24,000 Kilometers
FR-01130
FR-01994
FR-02629
FR-03008
FR-03014
Previous Reports and Resources - APN 310-052-27 Project Study Area Fresno County. California
Quad Knopf, Inc. 6
(/ FR-00548
FR-00448
Previous
o P-10-005363
o P-10-002189
Previous Resources
. - Study Area
□ USGS 7.5'Quad
I I Township and Range
Legend
ASM
Archaeology • History • Ethnography • Architectural History affiliates k
1/31/2024
Jaymie Brauer

Page 6 of 8 ends

Figure 3. Study area overview, looking northwest.

Figure 4. Study area overview, looking west/northwest.
d
--- 2*
A
Tt
-e—"s ara 7 ul*i 074
(0 (0(6 dD
0)0)
R.

CSopt., l -2 ..
oee w
r
44 eF.n) " $ erdr
e
is. star)
Amr 20—7 -lerkis’d
BRG: 300oW (T) POS: 36.767469, -119.657375
SW NW 240 330
N
o
W270 300
BRG: 311ONW (T) POS: 36.764907, -119.655093
NWSW 240 300 330 30
Study Area Overview
N
0 W270
30430.28 McKinley Temperance
Property
19 Jan 2024, 9:13:10 AM
2/0 |D)
J; (ol ®) O)
|D)
S3
0 3 ©
y |D)
hs
■ k
a 194s
t 141 @3 (o)
©
Aetas oI atwhgl
I l
4r
i' ye
I..

I ■
It . ■ 2
4 tig
1/31/2024
Jaymie Brauer

Page 7 of 8 ends

Figure 5. Overview of the residential portion of the property, looking southeast.

Figure 6. Overview of driveway from E. McKinley Ave., looking north. ■
1:
a
e (074.80)
Q (0
UlL O) 0) 0) ON/A
BRG: 358°N (T) POS: 36.76479, -119.658533
Lh-.
*th
Eawanu ale iz .
monoeemers**
ebomrennete
- --
SF s\
120 150 210
I I • I • I • I • I • I • I • I • I • I • I • I • I • I • I • N
0 NW NE
300 330 30 60
I • I • I • I • I • I • I • I • I • I • I • I • I ’ I • I ‘ I « I ’ I ’ rip
-
s
180
w270
C
is
E
60 90
I
BRG: 136OSE (T) POS: 36.767953, -119.659077
30430.28 McKinley Temperance
Property
19 Jan 2024, 9:59:00 AM
(
ve
1 -
CYd. ' - ' .
e C 3 ‘ •
Study Area Overview, House
Access
C0 ad
—=bdb .
2 2 —rt
-
ein— -
1/31/2024
Jaymie Brauer

Page 8 of 8 ends

Figure 7. Granitic milling slab shown to ASM crew.
2, S' a -
t.
§ t.

P te.
aiies
Lee A0ea irrel2 e veshe t
3 2 l M
3 A25r8 4
W, ssts se 2
%
4 -
213 A , . fre.
—is s
22)
Agve
* -
" “l* Te
8 ASn _ 050
W he Janet
- oemonee
“Att
t
Meh1
7 I.
et oge
lurye
GeentU) ww
re
& A S S O C I A T E S , I N C.

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING  ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING

CONSTRUCTION TESTING & INSPECTION
215 West Dakota Avenue • Clovis, California 93612 • (559) 348-2200 • FAX (559) 348-2190 With Offices Serving the Western United States
014-24011 McKinley Ranch Property Phase I Report Final.docx February 15, 2024 Project No. 014-24011
Ms. Juli Kutka
De Young Properties
677 West Palmdon Drive, #208
Fresno, California 93704
[email protected]
RE: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
McKinley Ranch Property
7298 East McKinley Avenue
APN 310-052-27
Fresno, California 93737
Dear Ms. Kutka:

Krazan & Associates, Inc., (Krazan) completed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment at the referenced site summarized in a report dated February 15, 2024. Please note that the earliest date of source review was on January 19, 2024. This report is considered viable within 180 days of that date. We appreciate the opportunity to serve your environmental due diligence needs.

During the course of this assessment, Krazan identified no evidence of recognized environmental conditions (RECs), or controlled RECs (CRECs) in connection with the subject site as defined by ASTM E 1527-21.

However, the following historical RECs (HRECs) and site development issues were identified:

HRECs
 Krazan’s historical review of the subject site indicates that one 500-gallon gasoline underground storage tanks (UST) was removed from the subject site under the oversight of the Fresno County Department of Community Health, Environmental Health System (FCEHS) in April 2006. Soil samples collected beneath the UST did not contain concentrations of total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPH-G), benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX), and methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE). On February 28, 2017, the FCEHS issued a UST Closure Letter regarding removal of the UST. Based on the regulatory “closure” status and no documented releases to the subsurface, there is no evidence that the UST formerly located at the subject site currently represents an environmental concern to the subject site. Please refer to Appendix C – UST Removal documentation for details.

SITE DEVELOPMENT ISSUES
 One domestic water well and one septic system are associated with the on-site occupied residential dwelling located at 7298 East McKinley Avenue. Additionally, one agricultural water well is located on the subject site. If the on-site water wells and septic system are not to be used in any future redevelopment, the well and septic system should be properly abandoned/destroyed in accordance with state and local guidelines.

Krazan
McKinley Ranch Property Project No. 014-024011
Fresno, California Page No. 2
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.

With Offices Serving the Western United States
014-24011 McKinley Ranch Property Phase I Report Final.docx If you have any questions regarding the information presented in this report, please call me at (559) 348- 2200.

Respectfully submitted,
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Michael H. Bowery, PG
Senior Project Manager
MHB/mlt
4/200044, G—

PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT

MCKINLEY RANCH PROPERTY
7298 EAST MCKINLEY AVENUE
FRESNO, CALIFORNIA 93737
Project No. 014-24011
February 15, 2024
Prepared for:

Ms. Juli Kutka
De Young Properties
677 West Palmdon Drive, #208
Fresno, California 93704
Prepared by:

Krazan & Associates, Inc.
215 West Dakota Avenue
Clovis, California 93612
(559) 348-2200
11 T
Krazan & ASSOCIATES, INC.

SITE DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS

TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..................................................................................................................... i

1.0 INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................... 1

2.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF ASSESSMENT ............................................................................ 3

2.1 Purpose ..................................................................................................................................... 3

2.2 Scope of Work........................................................................................................................... 3

3.0 SUBJECT SITE SETTING ........................................................................................................ 4

3.1 Geology and Hydrogeology ....................................................................................................... 4

4.0 SITE BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................... 6

4.1 Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps..................................................................................................... 6

4.2 USGS Topographic Quadrangle Maps ....................................................................................... 6

4.3 City Cross Reference Directories ............................................................................................... 7

4.4 Aerial Photograph Interpretation ................................................................................................ 8

4.5 Municipal Records .................................................................................................................... 9

4.6 Previous Environmental Assessment ........................................................................................ 10

4.7 Agricultural Chemicals ............................................................................................................ 10

5.0 USER-PROVIDED INFORMATION ...................................................................................... 11

5.1 Environmental Liens/Activity and Use Limitations Report ....................................................... 11

5.2 Interviews................................................................................................................................ 11

5.3 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment User Questionnaire .................................................... 12

6.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE ...................................................................................................... 14

6.1 Observations ........................................................................................................................... 14

6.2 Adjacent Streets and Property Usage ....................................................................................... 17

6.3 ASTM Non-Scope Considerations ........................................................................................... 17

6.4 Regulatory Agency Records Review ........................................................................................ 18

7.0 DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS .................................................................................................. 25

7.1 Evaluation of Data Gaps/Data Failure ...................................................................................... 25

8.0 CONCLUSIONS ....................................................................................................................... 27

9.0 RELIANCE ............................................................................................................................... 28

10.0 LIMITATIONS ..................................................................................................................... 28

11.0 QUALIFICATIONS .............................................................................................................. 29 REFERENCES .................................................................................................................................... 31 GLOSSARY OF TERMS .................................................................................................................... 32 TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)

FIGURES
Figure No. 1 Vicinity Map
Figure No. 2 Parcel Map
Figure No. 3 Site Map

SITE PHOTOGRAPHS

APPENDICES
Appendix A EDR – Certified Sanborn® Map Report
EDR – Historical Topo Map Report
EDR – City Directory Image Report
EDR – Aerial Photo Decade Package
Appendix B Title Report
Phase I ESA User Questionnaire
Asbestos and Lead Based Paint Surveys
Appendix C EDR – Radius Map Report
UST Removal Documentation
THAN Documents
i

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Krazan & Associates, Inc. (Krazan) has conducted a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of one irregular-shaped property with the associated Fresno County Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) of 310-052-

27. The parcel is located at 7298 East McKinley Avenue, in the County of Fresno, California 93737 (subject site). De Young Properties plans to purchase the property for future development.

A gasoline underground storage tank (UST) was removed from the subject site under the oversight of the FCEHS in 2006 and received regulatory closure in 2017.

Three groundwater monitoring wells were formerly located on the subject site in associated with the soil and groundwater investigations at the former T H Agricultural and Nutrition (THAN) facility located adjacent to the south/southwest of the subject site. The THAN facility received a Certification of Cleanup form the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) in May 2006 and was delisted from the Superfund National Priorities List (NPL). The three groundwater monitoring wells formerly located on the subject site were decommissioned and abandoned/destroyed in accordance with state/and local guidelines in 2017.

Krazan identified no evidence of recognized environmental conditions (RECs), or controlled RECs (CRECs) in connection with the subject site as defined by ASTM E 1527-21. However, the following historical RECs (HRECs) and site development issues were identified:

HRECs
 Krazan’s historical review of the subject site indicates that one 500-gallon gasoline underground storage tanks (UST) was removed from the subject site under the oversight of the Fresno County Department of Community Health, Environmental Health System (FCEHS) in April 2006. Soil samples collected beneath the UST did not contain concentrations of total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPH-G), benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX), and methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE). On February 28, 2017, the FCEHS issued a UST Closure Letter regarding the removal of the UST. Based on the regulatory “closure” status and no documented releases to the subsurface, there is no evidence that the UST formerly located at the subject site currently represents an environmental concern to the subject site. Please refer to Appendix C – UST Documentation for details.

McKinley Ranch Property Project No. 014-24011
Fresno, California Page No. 1
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.

With Offices Serving the Western United States
014-24011 McKinley Ranch Property Phase I Report Final.docx

1.0 INTRODUCTION
The subject site consists of one irregular-shaped parcel located at 7298 East McKinley Avenue, Fresno County, California 93737. The subject site is approximately 24 acres in area.

A gasoline UST was removed from the subject site under the oversight of the FCEHS in 2006 and received regulatory closure in 2017.

Krazan conducted the Phase I ESA of the subject site in conformance with the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) E 1527-21 Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process. This Phase I ESA constitutes all appropriate inquiry (AAI) designed to identify recognized environmental conditions (RECs) in connection with the previous ownership and uses of the subject site as defined by ASTM E 1527-21.

ASTM E 1527-21 Section 1.1.1 Recognized Environmental Conditions – In defining a standard of good commercial and customary practice for conducting an environmental site assessment of a parcel of property, the goal of the processes established by this practice is to identify recognized environmental conditions.

The term recognized environmental conditions means the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property: (1) due to any release to the environment; (2) under conditions indicative of a release to the environment; or (3) under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment. De minimis conditions are not recognized environmental conditions.

It is incumbent upon the user to read this Phase I ESA report in its entirety. If not otherwise defined within the text of this report, please refer to the Glossary of Terms Section following the References Section for definitions of terms and acronyms utilized within this Phase I ESA report.

McKinley Ranch Property Project No. 014-24011
Fresno, California Page No. 2
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.

With Offices Serving the Western United States
014-24011 McKinley Ranch Property Phase I Report Final.docx Previous Environmental Assessments
No previous environmental assessments were provided to Krazan by De Young Properties for review as part of this Phase I ESA.

McKinley Ranch Property Project No. 014-24011
Fresno, California Page No. 3
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.

With Offices Serving the Western United States
014-24011 McKinley Ranch Property Phase I Report Final.docx

2.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF ASSESSMENT

2.1 Purpose
According to ASTM E 1527-21, the purpose of this practice is to define good commercial and customary practice in the United States of America for conducting an environmental site assessment of a parcel of commercial real estate with respect to the range of contaminants within the scope of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) (42 U.S.C. §9601) and petroleum products. As such, this practice is intended to permit a user to satisfy one of the requirements to qualify for the innocent landowner, contiguous property owner, or bona fide prospective purchaser limitation on CERCLA liability (hereinafter, the landowner liability protections, or LLPs): that is, the practice that constitutes all appropriate inquiries into the previous ownership and uses of the property consistent with good commercial and customary practice as defined at 42 U.S.C. §9601(35)(B).

2.2 Scope of Work
The scope of work for this Phase I ESA conforms to ASTM E 1527-21. The Phase I ESA includes the following scope of work: a) a site reconnaissance of existing on-site conditions and observations of adjacent property uses, b) a review of user-provided documents and c) a review of historical aerial photographs, a review of pertinent building permit records, cross-reference directories, historical Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps (SFIMs), and interview(s) with person(s) knowledgeable of the previous and current ownership and uses of the subject site, d) a review of local regulatory agency records, and e) a review of local, state, and federal regulatory agency lists compiled by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR).

Krazan was provided authorization to conduct the Phase I ESA by Mr. Brandon De Young, with De Young Properties, on January 2, 2024 in response to Krazan’s October 12, 2023 Proposal/Cost Estimate No. P23- 435.

McKinley Ranch Property Project No. 014-24011
Fresno, California Page No. 4
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.

With Offices Serving the Western United States
014-24011 McKinley Ranch Property Phase I Report Final.docx

3.0 SUBJECT SITE SETTING
The subject site is located at 7298 Eat McKinley Avenue, in the County of Fresno, California. The subject site measures approximately 24 acres. General property information and property use are summarized in the following table. Refer to Figures No. 1 – 3 for subject site details.

Subject Site Information Summary
Current Owners: Vincent G. Zaninovich Jr. and Mary Theresa Zaninovich, Trustees, et al.

Assessor’s Parcel Number 310-052-27
Address: 7298 East McKinley Avenue
Historical Address: N/A
General Location: North of East McKinley Avenue between North Temperance and North De Wolf Avenues
Acreage: 24 acres
Zoning: AE20
Existing Use: One Occupied Residential Dwelling and one Unoccupied Residential Dwelling
Number of Structures: Two
Original Construction Date: At least 1937 and 1962
Proposed Use: Residential Development
Electricity: Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E)
Natural Gas: PG&E
Potable Water: Domestic Water Well
Sanitary Sewer: Septic System
Latitude / Longitude: 36.766692º / 119. 658384º
Topographic Map: U.S. Geological Survey, 7.5-minute Clovis, California topographic quadrangle map
Topographic Map Location: Southwest quarter of Section 26, Township 13 South, Range 21 East, Mount Diablo Baseline and Meridian
Topography: Approximately 352 feet above mean sea level Approximate Depth to Groundwater: 85 feet below ground surface (bgs), State of California Department of Water Resources (DWR)*
Regional Groundwater Flow Direction: Northwest, DWR*
Notes: * State of California, Department of Water Resources, Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) Data Viewer, Spring 2023

3.1 Geology and Hydrogeology
The subject site is located within the San Joaquin Valley, a broad structural trough bound by the Sierra Nevada and Coast Ranges of California. The San Joaquin Valley, which comprises the southern portion of the Great Valley of California, has been filled with several thousand feet of sedimentary deposits.

Sediments in the eastern valley, derived from the erosion of the Sierra Nevada, have been deposited by major to minor west-flowing drainages and their tributaries. Near-surface sediments are dominated by McKinley Ranch Property Project No. 014-24011
Fresno, California Page No. 5
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.

With Offices Serving the Western United States
014-24011 McKinley Ranch Property Phase I Report Final.docx sands and silty sands with lesser silts, minor clays, and gravel. The sedimentary deposits in the region form large coalescing alluvial fans with gentle slopes. According to the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service, predominate soils at the subject site are described as Atwater loamy sand. Groundwater in the subject site vicinity was reported to be first encountered at a depth of approximately 85 feet bgs in Spring 2023. The groundwater flow direction in the area of the subject site was reported to be toward the northwest.

McKinley Ranch Property Project No. 014-24011
Fresno, California Page No. 6
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.

With Offices Serving the Western United States
014-24011 McKinley Ranch Property Phase I Report Final.docx

4.0 SITE BACKGROUND
A review of historical Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps (SFIMs), historic USGS topographic maps, reasonably ascertainable city cross-reference directories, historical aerial photographs, local agency records and previous environmental reports, as made available to Krazan, were utilized to assess the history of the subject site.

4.1 Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps
Krazan reviews Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps (SFIMs) to evaluate prior land use of the subject site and the adjacent properties. SFIMs typically exist for cities with populations of 2,000 or more, the coverage dependent on the location of the subject site within the city limits. Krazan contracted with Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) to provide copies of available SFIMs for the subject site and the adjacent properties. EDR’s search of Sanborn Insurance maps revealed no coverage for the subject site and the adjacent properties. Refer to Appendix A – EDR – Certified Sanborn® Map Report, dated January 1, 2024 for details.

4.2 USGS Topographic Quadrangle Map
Krazan reviewed the 1923, 1946, 1947, 1964, 1972, 1981, 2012, 2015, 2018, and 2021 7.5-minute, Clovis and Malaga, California topographic quadrangle maps obtained from EDR. Subject site and vicinity property usage is summarized in the following table. Refer to Appendix A – EDR - Historical Topo Map Report,, dated January 19, 2024 for details.

Topographic Maps Summary
Year Site Usage Adjacent Property Usage
1923 An improved driveway leads from East
McKinley Avenue to a structure located
in the northern portion.

East McKinley Avenue bounds the subject
site to the south with a railroad track
located on the southern side. The Mill Ditch
traverses a portion of the northern boundary
of the subject site. The adjacent properties
are predominantly vacant land with
structures located to the north of Mill Ditch
and to the east of the subject site.

McKinley Ranch Property Project No. 014-24011
Fresno, California Page No. 7
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.

With Offices Serving the Western United States
014-24011 McKinley Ranch Property Phase I Report Final.docx Topographic Maps Summary (continued)
Year Site Usage Adjacent Property Usage
1946, 1947, Relatively similar to the 1923 map. Relatively similar to the 1923 map except that the property north of the Mill Ditch is
depicted in agricultural production.

Additionally, a guard station or work center
is depicted to the southwest of the subject
site beyond East McKinley Avenue. The
historical Fresno County community of
Burness is also depicted in this area.
1964, 1972 Relatively similar to the 1947 map
except that two structures are located
north of the on-site driveway. The name
of the historical Fresno County
community of Burness is depicted along
the southern boundary.

The northern and western portion of the
adjacent property to the west are in
agricultural production, as well as the
adjacent property to the north which is
located south of the Mill Ditch. The eastern
area of the adjacent property to the south is
in agricultural production. There is also a
railroad turntable or roundhouse located to
the southwest of the subject site and other
structures are depicted around this feature.
1981 Unchanged from the 1972 map. The adjacent properties are no longer in agricultural production.
2012 The subject site is depicted as vacant
land with a driveway depicted form East
McKinley Avenue to the northern
portion. The Mill Ditch bisects the
northwestern corner. Map details include
streets, highways and freeways,
waterways and surface elevation
contours. Subject site features such as
structures are not denoted.

The adjacent properties are depicted as
vacant land. Map details include streets,
highways and freeways, waterways and
surface elevation contours. Property
features such as structures are not denoted.

4.3 City Cross-Reference Directories
Krazan contracted with EDR to provide a review of available cross-reference directories dated between 1922 and 2020 for the subject site address. The summary of cross-reference directory information for the subject site address of 7298 East McKinley Avenue is presented in the following table. Adjacent properties were listed as residential uses. Refer to Appendix A – EDR - City Directory Image Report, dated January 19, 2024 for details.

McKinley Ranch Property Project No. 014-24011
Fresno, California Page No. 8
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.

With Offices Serving the Western United States
014-24011 McKinley Ranch Property Phase I Report Final.docx Cross-Reference Directories Summary
Address Owner / Occupant Years
Subject Site
7298 East McKinley Avenue No Listings
John Slavich Jr.

John Slavich
Vincent Zaninovich
Kelly Barnes-Mccue
Ailin Lee
Chase Lentz, Tracy Lentz
1922 to 1994
1995
1996 to 2000
2005
2014
2017
2020
Information obtained from the review of cross-reference directories is consistent with that obtained from other historical sources during the course of this assessment.

4.4 Aerial Photograph Interpretation
Historical aerial photographs were obtained from EDR and reviewed to assess the history of the subject site. The aerial photograph summary is provided in the following table. Refer to Appendix A – Aerial Photo Decade Package, dated January 19, 2024 for details.

Aerial Photograph Review Summary
Year Site Use Adjacent Properties
1937, 1946,
1950
The subject site appears to be
predominantly utilized for agricultural
purposes with a rural residential
dwelling located within the
northwestern portion along with
several associated farm structures.

Additionally, a tree-lined earthen
driveway appears to traverse the
subject site from East McKinley
Avenue to the on-site dwelling. The
Mill Ditch also appears to traverse a
portion of the northwestern boundary
of the subject site.

East McKinley Avenue appears to bound the
subject site to the south. The adjacent
properties to the west, east, and northeast
appear to be utilized for agricultural purposes.

The adjacent property to the south/southwest
appears to be occupied by several commercial
and/or industrial buildings and agricultural
property. What appear to be farm structures or
an agricultural water well and appurtenances
or located in the southern area of the western
portion of the adjacent property to the
northeast in the 1950 photograph.
1957, 1962,
1967, 1973,
1979, 1984,
1987
Relatively similar to the 1950
photograph except that a second rural
residential dwelling appears to have
been added to the northern portion of
the subject site. A swimming pool
appears to have been added adjacent to
the northeast of the most northern onsite residential dwelling and subsequent photo.

Unchanged from the 1950 photograph.

I I
McKinley Ranch Property Project No. 014-24011
Fresno, California Page No. 9
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.

With Offices Serving the Western United States
014-24011 McKinley Ranch Property Phase I Report Final.docx Aerial Photograph Review Summary (continued)
Year Site Use Adjacent Properties
1998, 2006 Unchanged from the 1987 photograph
except that two rectangular-shaped out
structures appear to have been added
to the northwestern portion of the
subject site. Additionally, what
appears to be a chicken coop is located
in the northeastern area.

Relatively similar to the 1987 photograph
except that what appear to be a small ponding
basin and a larger storm water retention basin
are located to the north and northeast of the
subject site respectively. A branch of the Mill
Ditch appears to bound the subject site to the
northeast. The adjacent property to the east
now appears to be vacant land. Additionally,
the building and structures located to the
southwest of the subject site appear to have
been removed.
2009, 2012,
2016, 2020
That portion of the subject site not
occupied by the tree-lined driveway,
residential dwellings and associated
out structures, appears to be vacant
land.

Unchanged from the 2006 photograph.

4.5 Municipal Records
Fresno County Public Works and Development Department Records On January 19, 2024, the FCPWDD was contacted regarding building permit records for the subject site address of 7298 East McKinley Avenue. According representatives of the FCPWDD, six building permit records are on file with the FCPWDD for the subject site and are listed in the following table, including date of issue, type of record, and a brief description. However, no permits for items such as underground storage tanks, building, demolition, or previous structures/features are on file with the FCPWDD for the subject site. Copies of the FCPWDD records were not readily available or ascertainable.

Summary of Building Department Records
Date Record Type Description
7298 East McKinley Avenue
January 27, 1965 Building Permit Swimming Pool
March 22, 1979 Building Permit 7 1/2 HP Pump
November 3, 1993 Utility Permit New Septic System
February 13, 1995 Building Permit Repair Subfloor
May 30, 1995 Utility Permit Septic and Leaching Replacement December 4, 2013 Building Permit Reroof
There have been no building permits filed with the FCPWDD subsequent to December 4, 2013.

McKinley Ranch Property Project No. 014-24011
Fresno, California Page No. 10
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.

With Offices Serving the Western United States
014-24011 McKinley Ranch Property Phase I Report Final.docx

4.6 Previous Environmental Assessments
No previous environmental assessments were provided to Krazan by De Young Properties for review as part of this Phase I ESA.

4.7 Agricultural Chemicals
A review of historical aerial photographs indicates that the subject site was in different stages of agricultural production from at least 1937 to at least 2009. Although the potential exists that environmentally persistent pesticides/herbicides were historically applied to the crops grown on the subject site 1) no material evidence of the use of environmentally persistent pesticides/herbicides was obtained during the course of this assessment, and 2) Krazan’s sampling and analysis of surface soils from properties with similar agricultural histories in the subject site area has typically yielded non-detectable results or very low concentrations for analysis of environmentally persistent pesticides/herbicides 3) it is anticipated that any environmentally persistent pesticides/herbicides potentially located on site will be dislocated/diluted as a result of the extensive grading and trenching operations associated with the proposed redevelopment of the subject site.

Consequently, given the above-referenced factors and Krazan’s experience in the subject site vicinity which generally indicates that the potential is low for elevated concentrations of environmentally persistent pesticides/herbicides related to agricultural cultivation to exist in the near-surface soils of common agricultural ground at concentrations which would require regulatory action, despite the absence of specific data, the potential for elevated concentrations of environmentally persistent pesticides/herbicides to currently exist in the near-surface soils of the subject site at concentrations which would require regulatory action appears to be low.

McKinley Ranch Property Project No. 014-24011
Fresno, California Page No. 11
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.

With Offices Serving the Western United States
014-24011 McKinley Ranch Property Phase I Report Final.docx

5.0 USER-PROVIDED INFORMATION
A review of user-provided information was conducted in order to help identify pertinent information regarding potential environmental impacts associated with the subject site.

5.1 Title Report
A Preliminary Title Report (PTR) dated December 26, 2023, prepared for the subject site by Placer Title Company, was provided to Krazan by Mr. De Young, with De Young Properties, the Phase I ESA user.

The subject site PTR was reviewed to identify potential deed restrictions, environmental liens or activity and use limitations (AULs) which may have occurred on or exist in connection with the subject site.

Krazan’s review of the PTR indicated no environmental deed restrictions, environmental liens or AULs for the subject site. However, as quoted from the subject site PTR, “It is important to note that this preliminary report is not a written representation as to the condition of title and may not list all liens, defects and encumbrances affecting title to the land.” Refer to Appendix B – Preliminary Title Reports for details.

An Environmental Lien Search was not prepared or provided to Krazan during the course of this assessment.

The absence of a Final Title Report or Environmental Lien Search represents a data gap.

5.2 Interviews
Krazan conducts interviews with the owner of the subject site, a key site manager, subject site occupant(s), and/or the previous owner/occupant(s) of the subject site. The interview(s) is/are designed to provide pertinent information regarding potential environmental impacts associated with the subject site.

Subject Site Owner
On February 14, 2024, a Phase I ESA Owner Interview was conducted with Mr. Vincent G. Zaninovich, Jr., Trustee, one of the owners of the subject site. Mr. Zaninovich stated that he has been familiar with the subject site for the past 52 years and he believes the on-site residential dwellings (one being unoccupied) were constructed prior to the 1950s. According to Mr. Zaninovich, the subject site has been historically occupied by the rural residential dwellings and utilized for agricultural purposes (vineyards and orchards).

Mr. Zaninovich also stated that there was never a historical chicken ranch operation at the subject site, but that the tenants have had many chickens and chicken coops on the property from at least 2017 to the present.

Mr. Zaninovich was not aware of the historical use of environmentally persistent pesticides/herbicides at the subject site. Mr. Zaninovich also stated that there is an agricultural water well located on site and one McKinley Ranch Property Project No. 014-24011
Fresno, California Page No. 12
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.

With Offices Serving the Western United States
014-24011 McKinley Ranch Property Phase I Report Final.docx domestic water well and septic system are associated with the occupied on-site dwelling. Additionally, Mr.

Zaninovich stated that in 2006, one 500-gallon gasoline UST was removed from an area in front of the garage associated with the on-site occupied residential dwelling which received regulatory closure status.

Mr. Zaninovich stated that he was also aware of the on-going investigation into the contaminated groundwater plume in the immediate vicinity of the subject site. However, Mr. Zaninovich stated that the three groundwater monitoring wells that were located on the subject site were abandoned/destroyed in 2017, and that he believes that the release from the former chemical formulation company located adjacent to the southwest of the subject site was properly remediated.

According to Mr. Zaninovich, to the best of his knowledge, no disposal of hazardous materials; no hazardous materials spills, no environmental cleanups, no on-site treatment and/or discharge of waste; no environmental liens, AULs, ASTs, engineering or institutional controls, no dry wells, sumps, or disposal ponds; no buried materials; or any items of environmental concern are associated with the subject site. Mr.

Zaninovich indicated that the reason for preparation of this Phase I ESA is related to a property sale for the development of residential homes on the subject site, and the purchase price reasonably reflects fair market value.

Previous Subject Site Owner Interview
A Phase I ESA interview with a previous owner of the subject site was not conducted as contact information was not reasonably available.

5.3 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment User Questionnaire In order to qualify for one of the Landowner Liability Protections (LLPs) offered by the Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act of 2001 (the Brownfields Amendments), the user must provide the following information (if available) to the environmental professional. Failure to provide this information could result in a determination that all appropriate inquiry is not complete. The user is asked to provide information or knowledge of the following:

1. Environmental cleanup liens that are filed or recorded against the site.

2. Activity and land use limitations that are in place on the site or that have been filed or recorded in a registry.

3. Specialized knowledge or experience of the person seeking to qualify for the LLPs.

4. Relationship of the purchase price to the fair market value of the property if it were not McKinley Ranch Property Project No. 014-24011
Fresno, California Page No. 13
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.

With Offices Serving the Western United States
014-24011 McKinley Ranch Property Phase I Report Final.docx contaminated.

5. Commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information about the property.

6. The degree of obviousness of the presence or likely presence of contamination at the property, and the ability to detect the contamination by appropriate investigation.

7. The reason for preparation of this Phase I ESA.

On August 8, 2023, a completed Phase I ESA User questionnaire was received from Ms. Shannon De Young, with De Young Properties, Krazan’s client and the Phase I ESA user. Refer to Appendix B – Phase I ESA Questionnaires for details.

According to the questionnaire responses, Ms. De Young, to the best of her knowledge as one of the users of this Phase I ESA, was not aware of any environmental cleanup lien which have been filed or recorded against the subject site. Ms. DeYoung also indicated that she is not aware of activity use limitations (AULs) that have been filed on the subject site. According to Ms. De Young, the subject site has been cultivated as a fig orchard for many years, and that the owner said her dad was the original owner and never used pesticides on the fig orchards. Ms. De Young indicated that the original owner always farmed the figs naturally. Ms. De Young was not aware of any spills or other chemical releases at the subject site and indicated that there are no obvious indicators that point to the presence or likely presence of contamination at the subject site. Ms. De Young also indicated that the reason for preparation of this Phase I ESA is related to a property purchase and the purchase price reasonably reflects fair market value.

McKinley Ranch Property Project No. 014-24011
Fresno, California Page No. 14
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.

With Offices Serving the Western United States
014-24011 McKinley Ranch Property Phase I Report Final.docx

6.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE
A site reconnaissance, which included a visual observation of the subject site and surrounding properties, was conducted by Mr. Kenneth Sani, Krazan’s Environmental Assessor, on January 31, 2024. Krazan’s Environmental Assessor was unaccompanied during the site reconnaissance. The objective of the site reconnaissance is to obtain information indicating the likelihood of identifying recognized environmental conditions, including hazardous substances and petroleum products, in connection with the property (including soils, surface waters, and groundwater).

6.1 Observations
The following table summarizes the subject site features encountered during our site reconnaissance.

Observed features are noted in the table below and described in detail below the table. Refer to Figure No. 3 - Site Map and Photographs for locations and details pertaining to site-specific features discussed in this section of the report.

Summary of Site Reconnaissance
Feature Observed Not Observed
Structures (existing) X
Evidence of Past Uses (foundations, debris) X
Hazardous Substances and/or Petroleum Products (including containers) X Aboveground Storage Tanks (ASTs) X
Underground Storage Tanks (USTs) or Evidence of USTs X
Evidence of Underground Pipelines X
Strong, Pungent, or Noxious Odors X
Pools of Liquid Likely to be Hazardous Materials or Petroleum Products X Drums X
Unidentified Substance Containers X
Potential Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB)-Containing Equipment X Subsurface Hydraulic Equipment X
Heating/Ventilation/Air conditioning (HVAC) X
Stains or Corrosion on Floors, Walls, or Ceilings X
Floor Drains, Sumps, or Oil/Water Clarifiers X
Storm Drains X
Pits, Ponds, or Lagoons X
Stained Soil and/or Pavement X
Soil Piles X
Stressed Vegetation X
Waste or Wastewater (including stormwater) Discharges to Surface/ Surface Waters X
Wells (irrigation, domestic, dry, injection, abandoned, monitoring wells) X Septic Systems X
McKinley Ranch Property Project No. 014-24011
Fresno, California Page No. 15
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.

With Offices Serving the Western United States
014-24011 McKinley Ranch Property Phase I Report Final.docx An occupied rural residential dwelling with the associated subject site address of 7298 East McKinley Avenue was observed within the northern portion of the subject site. The on-site dwelling is approximately 2,501 square feet in size and is set upon a slab-on-grade foundation with wood-frame construction and brick/stucco exterior. Several chicken coops occupied by chickens were observed within the attached garage. No evidence of hazardous materials storage/waste was observed within the on-site dwelling or attached garage. Additionally, an older unoccupied dwelling was observed adjacent to the southwest of the current residential dwelling. The older dwelling was partially boarded up and no evidence of hazardous materials storage/waste was observed within the unoccupied dwelling.

Several piles of tree limbs were observed in the rear of the on-site occupied residential dwelling and northeastern portion of the subject site. No evidence of hazardous materials storage/waste was observed within or adjacent to the tree limbs.

Several canopies with planters, metal chicken feed bins, chicken coops, and plastic containers of grain beneath them were observed within the northern portion of the subject site. No evidence of hazardous materials storage/waste was observed beneath the canopies.

A domestic water well, wooden barricades, and cactus plants, were observed adjacent to the west of the onsite occupied residential dwelling. No evidence of hazardous materials storage/waste was observed within this area of the subject site.

Several chickens, wooden chicken coops and wooden tables and benches under canopies were observed adjacent to the north of the on-site residential dwelling attached garage. Additionally, several chicken coops were observed throughout the subject site. No evidence of hazardous materials storage/waste was observed in association with the chicken coops or wooden tables and benches.

Two large chicken coops, metal drums containing grain and chicken feed, and a wooden pallet placed on block-lite masonry bricks, were also observed in the northern portion of the subject site. No evidence of hazardous materials storage/waste was observed in this area of the subject site.

Several 50 pounds sacks of grain and chicken feed placed on a wooden pallet and block-lite masonry brick beneath a cloth canopy were observed in the northern portion of the subject site as well.

McKinley Ranch Property Project No. 014-24011
Fresno, California Page No. 16
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.

With Offices Serving the Western United States
014-24011 McKinley Ranch Property Phase I Report Final.docx The Mill Ditch was observed traversing the northern and northeastern boundaries of the subject site. No odors or evidence of hazardous materials/waste were observed in association with the Mill Ditch.

A tree-lined cobblestone driveway was observed on the subject site leading from East McKinley Avenue to the on-site occupied residential dwelling.

A concrete irrigation standpipe was observed on each side of the on-site tree-lined driveway near the central portion. No evidence of hazardous materials storage/waste was observed in association with the irrigation standpipes.

One inactive agricultural water well was observed within the northern portion of the subject site near one of the trees along the on-site earthen driveway. No evidence of hazardous materials or staining on the ground surface was observed in association with the active agricultural water well. No information regarding analytical testing or construction specifications of the on-site well was found during the course of this assessment.

Two pole-mounted electrical transformers were observed within the northern portion of the subject site.

The transformer casings displayed no visual evidence of leakage and the concrete surface below the transformers displayed no evidence of discoloration. Based on Krazan’s observations, the Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) Company is the owner of the transformers. Based on the visual absence of apparent unauthorized releases of insulating fluids from the transformers at the time of Krazan’s site reconnaissance, the transformers are not currently anticipated to pose an adverse impact to the subject site.

The remainder of the subject site was observed to be vacant land with vegetative weed growth.

During the visual observations of the subject site, exposed surface soils did not exhibit obvious signs of discoloration. No obvious evidence (vent pipes, fill pipes, dispensers, etc.) of USTs was noted within the areas observed. No standing water or major depressions were observed on the subject site.

No high-voltage, tower-mounted electrical transmission lines were observed on or in the vicinity of the subject site.

McKinley Ranch Property Project No. 014-24011
Fresno, California Page No. 17
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.

With Offices Serving the Western United States
014-24011 McKinley Ranch Property Phase I Report Final.docx

6.2 Adjacent Streets and Property Usage
The following table summarize the current adjacent streets and adjacent property uses observed during the site reconnaissance:

Adjacent Streets and Property Use
Direction Adjacent Street Adjacent Property Use
North None Mill Ditch, Ponding Basins
South East McKinley Avenue Agricultural, Former T.H.A.N. Facility Site West None Residential
East None Vacant Field
Northeast None Mill Ditch, Storm Water Retention Basin
Based on the observed uses of the properties located immediately adjacent to the subject site, it is unlikely that significant quantities of hazardous materials are stored at the adjacent properties. Reference is made to Section 6.4, Regulatory Agency Interface, of this report for a discussion of the former T.H.A.N. facility release and the DTSC certification of remediation issued to the facility in 2006.

6.3 ASTM Non-Scope Considerations
According to ASTM E 1527-21, there may be environmental issues or conditions at assessed properties that are outside the scope of the Phase I ESA practice (non-scope considerations). Some substances may be present in quantities and under conditions that may lead to contamination of the subject site or of nearby properties but are not included in CERCLA’s definition of hazardous substances (42 U.S.C. §9601[14]).

ASTM Non-scope considerations appropriate for the subject site are discussed below.

Radon
Radon is a radioactive gas that is found in certain geologic environments and is formed by the natural breakdown of radium, which is found in the earth’s crust. A radon survey was not included within the scope of this investigation; however, the State of California Department of Public Health (CDPH) maintains a statewide database of radon results in designated geographic areas. Radon detection devices are placed in homes throughout the study region to determine geographic regions with elevated radon concentrations.

The U.S. EPA has set the safety standard for radon gas in homes to be 4.0 pico Curies per liter (pCi/L).

The US EPA has prepared a map to assist National, State and local organizations to target their resources and to implement radon-resistant building codes. The map divides the country into three Radon Zones, Zone 1 being those areas with the average predicted indoor radon concentration in residential dwellings exceeding the EPA Action Limit of 4.0 pCi/L. It is important to note that the EPA has found homes with McKinley Ranch Property Project No. 014-24011
Fresno, California Page No. 18
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.

With Offices Serving the Western United States
014-24011 McKinley Ranch Property Phase I Report Final.docx elevated levels of radon in all three zones, and the EPA recommends site-specific testing in order to determine radon levels at a specific location. However, the map does give a valuable indication of the propensity of radon gas accumulation in structures. Review of the EPA Map of Radon Zones places the Property in Zone 2, where average predicted radon levels are between 2.0 and 4.0 pCi/L. Therefore, the available data suggests that the potential for radon to adversely impact the subject site appears to be low.

Furthermore, an Asbestos and Lead Based Paint Survey and sampling of the on-site structures was conducted by Krazan in December 2016. Category I non-friable ACMs, as well as trace asbestos were identified in the main residence and nanny house on the subject site. None of the paints sampled contained

0.5% or greater total lead by weight, although, some paints contained greater than 0.009% total lead by weight and are defined as lead-containing paint. Please refer to Appendix B – Asbestos and Lead Based Paint Survey reports for details.

Environmental Non-Compliance Issues
No material non-compliance issues were identified in connection with the subject site in the process of preparing this report.

Activity and Use Limitations
No activity and use limitations were identified in connection with the subject site in the process of preparing this report.

6.4 Regulatory Agency Records Review
A review of Federal and State regulatory databases was conducted to help determine if hazardous materials have been handled, stored, or generated on the subject site and/or the adjacent properties and businesses.

The Federal and State environmental databases consulted in the course of this assessment were compiled by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) and identified facilities within the search distances specified in ASTM 1527-21. Krazan verified the location and distances of the properties Krazan deemed as having the potential to adversely impact the subject site. The actual location of the listed properties may differ from the EDR listing. No EDR-listed unmapped (non-geocoded) sites identified were determined to be located on or adjacent to the subject site. Krazan did not verify the locations and distances of every property listed by EDR. Refer to Appendix C – EDR Radius Map Report for details.

McKinley Ranch Property Project No. 014-24011
Fresno, California Page No. 19
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.

With Offices Serving the Western United States
014-24011 McKinley Ranch Property Phase I Report Final.docx Regulatory records are reviewed based on the following criteria: 1) properties with known soils and/or groundwater releases considered to represent the potential for impact to the subject site that are located within 1,760 feet of the subject site for constituents of concern impacts or 528 feet of the subject site for petroleum hydrocarbon impacts; 2) properties that are adjacent or in proximity to the subject site included within the EDR regulatory database report or noted during the site reconnaissance to possibly handle, store, or generate hazardous materials. Applicable property records are discussed below.

No Federal Superfund – National Priorities List (NPL) sites were determined to be located within a onemile radius of the subject site.

State of California Environmental Protection Agency
Krazan’s August 7, 2023 review of the State of California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) – Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) Envirostor database available via the DTSC’s Internet Website indicated that no records of cleanup sites including State response sites, voluntary cleanup sites, school cleanup sites, military or school evaluation sites are listed for the subject site. However, records are on file for a delisted NPL site, the former T H Agricultural and Nutrition (THAN) site, located adjacent to the south/southwest of the subject site, which are discussed below:

T H Agriculture and Nutrition, LLC (THAN)
7183 East McKinley Avenue
adjacent to the south/southwest
According to DTSC records, THAN previously operated as an agricultural chemical formulation/manufacturer from 1950 to 1981. The plant ceased operations in 1983. Investigations conducted at this site in the 1980s and 1990s identified pesticide and agricultural chemicals contamination in soil and groundwater associated with the historical site operations. In June 1999, the DTSC approved a cleanup Remedial Action Plan (RAP) for this former facility. Remedial activities at this site have included soil excavation and removal, soil vapor extraction, and the installation of a composite clay and vegetated soil cap. In addition, alternative drinking water supplies were provided to nearby residences. The Final Remedy was fully implemented in 2005, when the Operation, Maintenance and Monitoring Agreement (OM & M) was finalized and Deed Restriction was recorded with the County of Fresno. The Deed Restriction limits the use of the property to industrial or commercial uses only. This former facility was certified as having been remediated by the DTSC in May 2006 and was deleted from the USEPA’s National Priority List in August 2006. Five-year reviews are being conducted to evaluate the performance of the remedy and ensure that it remains protective of human health and the environment. Post-closure activities include periodic inspection and maintenance of the cap, as well as long-term groundwater monitoring.

McKinley Ranch Property Project No. 014-24011
Fresno, California Page No. 20
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.

With Offices Serving the Western United States
014-24011 McKinley Ranch Property Phase I Report Final.docx Groundwater monitoring has been conducted since the early-1990s and is currently ongoing at this former facility; and a dibromochloropropane (DBCP) and 1, 2, 3, trichloropropane (TCP) impacted groundwater plume extends hydraulically downgradient to the southwest. As part of the off-site groundwater monitoring program (GMP), Groundwater Monitoring Wells 154A1 154B1, and 154C1 were installed within the southern portion of the subject site just north of East McKinley Avenue in 1985. In February 2011, an Evaluation of DBCP and TCP in Underlying Groundwater was prepared by Kennedy/Jenks Consultants and submitted to the DTSC. Analytical results of groundwater samples obtained from the groundwater monitoring well cluster on the subject site in 2010 and 2011 detected concentrations of DBCP at the practical quantitation limit (PQL) of 0.02 parts per billion (ppb). Additionally, in 2011, concentrations of TCP at the PQL limit were detected in Groundwater Monitoring Wells 154B1 and 154C1 located on the subject site.

According to the consultant’s report, in general, TCP concentrations in the groundwater monitoring wells have dropped below the health-based level of 0.16 ppb listed in the RAP. However, because DBCP is a regional groundwater pollutant in the northeast Fresno area, non-point source applications appear to have contributed to concentrations reaching the PQL.

A Second Five-Year Review Report, prepared by URS, was submitted to the DTSC in June 2015 to assess whether the Final Remedy is remaining effective in protecting human health and the environment. According to the report, none of the groundwater samples obtained from the groundwater monitoring wells during the period from 2008 to 2013 contained constituents of concern (COCs) exceeding the Final Remediation Goals (FRGs), and there are no apparent trends to indicate a likelihood of exceeding the FRGs in the future. Groundwater monitoring wells 154B1 and 154C1, located on the subject site appeared to show a decreasing trend in both DBCP and TCP concentrations. Other volatile organic compounds (VOCs) detected in the groundwater samples obtained from the subject site groundwater monitoring wells also showed a decreasing trend. The DTSC concurred with the findings of the Second Five-Year Review Report and determined that the remedy remains effective.

In August 2016, a Work Plan For Decommissioning of 16 Monitoring Wells was submitted to the DTSC. The Work Plan identified 16 monitoring wells that are no longer being used and are no longer needed. However, the three groundwater monitoring wells located on the subject site were still active and being monitored, and are not included in the 16 monitoring wells that are being decommissioned. On October 27, 2016, the DTSC approved the Work Plan, although Groundwater Monitoring Wells 154A1, 154B1 and 154C1 located on the subject site would continue to be sampled and monitored as part of the on-going GMP.

However, a Year 2017 Annual Monitoring Report, prepared by URS, was submitted to the DTSC in March 2018. According to the report, the three groundwater monitoring wells located on the subject site (154-A1, 154-B1, and 154-C1) were destroyed in accordance with the workplan dated October 4, 2017, which was approved by the DTSC in a letter dated October 23, 2017. Analytical groundwater monitoring results for former on-site GW Monitoring Wells 154-B1 and 154-C1 detected less than 0.02 micrograms per liter (µg/L) of DBCP and 1,2,3-TCP, respectively, prior to abandonment/destruction per state and local guidelines.

Additionally, a Year 2018 Annual Monitoring Report , prepared by AECOM, was submitted to the DTSC in March 2019. Analytical groundwater monitoring results for GW Monitoring Well 29-B, located closest to the subject site across East McKinley Avenue, detected less than 0.02 µg/L of DBCP and 0.079 µg/L of 1,2,3-TCP.

McKinley Ranch Property Project No. 014-24011
Fresno, California Page No. 21
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.

With Offices Serving the Western United States
014-24011 McKinley Ranch Property Phase I Report Final.docx Based on Krazan’s review of DTSC records, it appears that the former THAN facility has contributed to the DBCP and TCP impacted groundwater plume located in the immediate vicinity of the subject site. Although, it also appears that samples from the three groundwater monitoring wells formerly located on the subject site did not contain COCs that exceeded FRGs and were properly abandoned in October 2017. Additionally, in general, the groundwater monitoring wells in the vicinity of the subject site have shown decreasing trends in DBCP and TCP concentrations from 2008 to 2018, and the former THAN facility has been certified as having been remediated and taken off the NPL list.

Therefore, there is no longer any material evidence to suggest that this off-site former chemical formulation facility represents an environmental concern in connection with the subject site.

However, DBCP is a regional groundwater pollutant and has contributed to concentrations of DBCP at the PQL in several of the investigative groundwater monitoring wells. Therefore, based on its close location, in the unlikely event that a release from this facility were to migrate beneath the subject site, the responsibility for investigation and remediation would typically be that of the off-site property owner. Refer to Appendix C – THAN Regulatory Documents for details.

State of California Regional Water Quality Control Board - GeoTracker Krazan’s August 7, 2023 review of the State of California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) GeoTracker database available via the RWQCB Internet Website did not identify any cleanup sites including LUST sites, cleanup program sites, land disposal sites, or military sites at the subject site.

California Department of Conservation, California Geologic Energy Management Division Krazan’s August 7, 2023 review of the State of California Department of Conservation, California Geologic Energy Management Division (CalGEM) GIS Online Mapping System indicated that no plugged and abandoned or producing oil wells are located on or adjacent to the subject site.

Fresno County Department of Public Health, Environmental Health System The Fresno County Department of Public Health, Environmental Health System (FCEHS) is the lead regulatory agency or Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for hazardous materials handling facilities in Fresno County. Krazan’s January 19, 2024 review of the FCEHS CUPA and Solid Waste Programs Resource List (CUPA List) indicated that records are on file with the FCEHS for the subject site and one adjacent property which are discussed below:

Kathryn Zaninovich Property (CUPA LISTINGS)
Catherine Zaninovich (HWTS, HAZNET)
Vince Zaninovich ( HWTS, HAZNET)
7298 East McKinley Avenue
Subject site
McKinley Ranch Property Project No. 014-24011
Fresno, California Page No. 22
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.

With Offices Serving the Western United States
014-24011 McKinley Ranch Property Phase I Report Final.docx According to records on file with the FCEHS, one 500-gallon gasoline UST was removed from the subject site property on April 18, 2006. Analysis of soil samples obtained from beneath the UST did not detect concentrations of total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPH-G), benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX), and methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE). On February 28, 2017, the FCEHS issued a UST Closure Letter regarding the removal of the UST. Based on its regulatory “closure” status, and no documented releases to the subsurface, there is no material evidence to suggest that the UST removal from the subject site currently poses an environmental concern to the subject site. Please refer to Appendix C – Regulatory Agency Documents for details.

Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District
Basin RCB (CUPA LISTINGS, HWTS, HAZNET)
7616 East McKinley Avenue
Adjacent to the north/northeast
According to records on file with the FCEHS, one 550-gallon gasoline UST was removed from this facility on October 14, 1994. Analysis of soil samples obtained from beneath the UST were nondetect for benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX) and total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPH-G). On October 31, 1994, the FCEHS issued a No Further Action Letter regarding the removal of the UST. Based on its regulatory “closure” status and the absence of documented releases to the subsurface, there is no material evidence to suggest that this facility currently represents an environmental concern in connection with the subject site.

Fresno County Fire Protection District
The Fresno County Fire Protection District (FCFPD) has jurisdiction for the fire protection for the subject site and the immediate vicinity. According to representatives of the FCFPD, records of hazardous materials incidents are kept by the FCEHS. Additionally, hazardous/flammable incidents are filed according to the date of occurrence and not by the location of occurrence with the FCFPD. Therefore, records of hazardous/flammable releases or incidents were not reasonably ascertainable from the FCFPD.

Regulatory Database Review
Several agencies have published documents that list businesses or properties which have handled hazardous materials or waste or may have experienced site contamination. The lists consulted in the course of our assessment were compiled by EDR and Krazan and represent reasonably ascertainable current listings.

Krazan verified the location and distances of the properties Krazan deemed as having the potential to adversely impact the subject site. Krazan did not verify the locations and distances of every property listed by EDR. The actual location of the listed properties may differ from the EDR listing. No EDR-listed unmapped (non-geocoded) sites identified were determined to be located on or adjacent to the subject site.

McKinley Ranch Property Project No. 014-24011
Fresno, California Page No. 23
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.

With Offices Serving the Western United States
014-24011 McKinley Ranch Property Phase I Report Final.docx Hazardous Materials Migration in Soils and/or Groundwater The remaining properties within the specified search radius of the subject site which appeared on local, state, or federally published lists of sites that use or have had releases of hazardous materials or petroleum products are of sufficient distance and/or situated hydraulically cross- or downgradient from the subject site such that impact to the subject site via groundwater migration is unlikely. In general, potentially hazardous materials released from facilities located approximately hydraulically upgradient within subject site vicinity, or in a hydraulically cross-gradient direction in proximity to the site, may have a reasonable potential of migrating to the subject site via groundwater flow. This opinion is based on the assumption that non-vaporous hazardous materials generally do not migrate large distances laterally within the soil, but rather tend to migrate with groundwater in the general direction of groundwater flow. However, the potential for migration of volatile hazardous materials may include movement within soils, groundwater flow or potentially omni-directionally if present in a vaporous state.

Hazardous Materials Migration in Vapor
Hazardous materials or petroleum product vapors which may have the potential to migrate into the subsurface of the subject site may be caused by the release of vapors from contaminated soil or groundwater either on or in the vicinity of the subject site from current or historical uses of the subject site and/or adjacent or vicinity properties. Current or past land uses such as gasoline stations (using petroleum hydrocarbons), dry cleaning establishments (using chlorinated volatile organic compounds), former manufactured gas plant sites (using volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds), and former industrial sites such as those that had vapor degreasing or other parts-cleaning operations (using chlorinated volatile organic compounds) are of particular concern. Constituent of concern vapors are capable of migrating great distances omnidirectionally along subsurface conduits such as pipelines, utility lines, sewer and stormwater lines, and building foundations.

Krazan’s review of records on file with the DTSC indicate that the DTSC is overseeing groundwater assessment and remediation work at the former THAN facility located adjacent to the south/southwest of the subject site. Constituents of concern include DBCP and TCE. The documented presence of significant concentration of VOCs in soil and groundwater and the on-going groundwater investigation at this former agricultural chemical formulation facility located with the immediate vicinity of the subject site represented a potential vapor encroachment condition. However, the former THAN site received a Certification of Cleanup from the DTSC in May 2006 and was delisted from the Superfund National Priorities List (NPL).

McKinley Ranch Property Project No. 014-24011
Fresno, California Page No. 24
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.

With Offices Serving the Western United States
014-24011 McKinley Ranch Property Phase I Report Final.docx Three groundwater monitoring wells formerly located on the subject site were decommissioned and abandoned/destroyed in accordance with state/and local guidelines in 2017. Therefore, there is no evidence that soil vapor is currently an environmental concern.

No engineering control sites, sites with institutional controls, or sites with deed restrictions were listed for the subject site, adjacent sites or vicinity properties in the EDR Report.

McKinley Ranch Property Project No. 014-24011
Fresno, California Page No. 25
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.

With Offices Serving the Western United States
014-24011 McKinley Ranch Property Phase I Report Final.docx

7.0 DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS
Summary of Conclusions
Apparent Evidence of RECs or PAOCs Not Noted Noted
Historical Uses X
Current Uses X
Adjacent of Vicinity Property Uses X
Historical Uses
Based on Krazan’s review of historical aerial photographs, a site reconnaissance, contacts with the local regulatory agencies, there is no evidence that RECs exist in connection with the historical uses of the subject site. However, HRECS were identified in regards to a UST removed from the subject site. Reference is made to Section 8.0 of this report for further details.

Current Uses
Based on Krazan’s site reconnaissance, contacts with local regulatory agencies, and an interview with the key site manager of the subject site, there is no evidence that RECs exist in connection with the current uses of the subject site.

Adjacent or Vicinity Property Uses
Based on Krazan’s field observations, review of the EDR government database report, and consultation with local regulatory agencies, there is no longer any material evidence that RECs exist in connection with the subject site from the former THAN chemical formulation facility located adjacent to the south/southwest of the subject site. Investigative activities with regulatory oversight are still ongoing as part of the DBCP and TCP impacted groundwater plume within the immediate vicinity of the subject site, however, groundwater samples from 2008 to 2017 showed a decreasing trend in DBCP and TCP concentrations, and the three groundwater monitoring wells formerly located on the subject site from the THAN investigation were properly abandoned/destroyed in 2017.

7.1 Evaluation of Data Gaps/Data Failure
In accordance with ASTM E 1527-21 guidance, data gaps represent a lack of or inability to obtain information required by this practice despite good faith efforts by the environmental professional to gather such information. Data gaps may result from incompleteness in any of the activities required by this practice. Data failure represents the failure to achieve the historical research objectives of this practice even after reviewing the standard historical sources that are reasonably ascertainable and likely to be useful.

McKinley Ranch Property Project No. 014-24011
Fresno, California Page No. 26
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.

With Offices Serving the Western United States
014-24011 McKinley Ranch Property Phase I Report Final.docx Data failure is one type of data gap. The following is a summary of data gaps encountered in the process of preparing this report including an observation as to the presumed significance of that data gap to the conclusions of this assessment.
 Absence of Final Title Report or Environmental Lien Search (Section 5.1) A Final Title Report or Environmental Lien Search were not provided by the Phase I ESA user; therefore, a data gap exists. Taken in consideration with the available information obtained in the course of preparing this report in conjunction with professional experience, there is no evidence to suggest that this data gap might alter the conclusions of this assessment. However, the contents of a Final Title Report or Environmental Lien Search are unknown.

McKinley Ranch Property Project No. 014-24011
Fresno, California Page No. 27
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.

With Offices Serving the Western United States
014-24011 McKinley Ranch Property Phase I Report Final.docx

8.0 CONCLUSIONS
We have conducted a Phase I ESA of the subject site in conformance with the scope and limitations of the ASTM E 1527-21 Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process guidance documents. Any deviations from this practice were previously described in this report. Krazan identified no evidence of recognized environmental conditions (RECs), or controlled RECs (CRECs) in connection with the subject site as defined by ASTM E 1527-21. However, the following historical RECs (HRECs) and site development issues were identified:

HRECs
 Krazan’s historical review of the subject site indicates that one 500-gallon gasoline underground storage tanks (UST) was removed from the subject site under the oversight of the Fresno County Department of Community Health, Environmental Health System (FCEHS) in April 2006. Soil samples collected beneath the UST did not contain concentrations of total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPH-G), benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX), and methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE). On February 28, 2017, the FCEHS issued a UST Closure Letter regarding the removal of the UST. Based on the regulatory “closure” status and no documented releases to the subsurface, there is no evidence that the UST formerly located at the subject site currently represents an environmental concern to the subject site. Please refer to Appendix C –UST Documents for details.

McKinley Ranch Property Project No. 014-24011
Fresno, California Page No. 28
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.

With Offices Serving the Western United States
014-24011 McKinley Ranch Property Phase I Report Final.docx

9.0 RELIANCE
This report was prepared solely for use by Client and should not be provided to any other person or entity without Krazan & Associates’ prior written consent. No party other than Client may rely on this report without Krazan & Associates’ express prior written consent. Reliance rights for third parties will only be in effect once requested by Client and authorized by Krazan & Associates with authorization granted by way of a Reliance Letter. The Reliance Letter will require that the relying party(ies) agree to be bound to the terms and conditions of the agreement between Client and Krazan & Associates as if originally issued to the relying party(ies), or as so stipulated in the Reliance Letter.

10.0 LIMITATIONS
The site reconnaissance and research of the subject site has been limited in scope. This type of assessment is undertaken with the calculated risk that the presence, full nature, and extent of contamination would not be revealed by visual observation alone. Although a thorough site reconnaissance was conducted in accordance with ASTM Guidelines and employing a professional standard of care, no warranty is given, either expressed or implied, that hazardous material contamination or buried structures, which would not have been disclosed through this investigation, do not exist at the subject site. Therefore, the data obtained are clear and accurate only to the degree implied by the sources and methods used.

The findings presented in this report were based upon field observations during a single property visit, review of available data, and discussions with local regulatory and advisory agencies. Observations describe only the conditions present at the time of this investigation. The data reviewed and observations made are limited to accessible areas and currently available records searched. Krazan cannot guarantee the completeness or accuracy of the regulatory agency records reviewed. Additionally, in evaluating the property, Krazan has relied in good faith upon representations and information provided by individuals noted in the report with respect to present operations and existing property conditions, and the historical uses of the property. It must also be understood that changing circumstances in the property usage, proposed property usage, subject site zoning, and changes in the environmental status of the other nearby properties can alter the validity of conclusions and information contained in this report. Therefore, the data obtained are clear and accurate only to the degree implied by the sources and methods used.

McKinley Ranch Property Project No. 014-24011
Fresno, California Page No. 29
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.

With Offices Serving the Western United States
014-24011 McKinley Ranch Property Phase I Report Final.docx This report is provided for the exclusive use of the client noted on the cover page and shall be subject to the terms and conditions in the applicable contract between the client and Krazan. Any third-party use of this report, including use by Client’s lender, shall also be subject to the terms and conditions governing the work in the contract between the client and Krazan. The unauthorized use of, reliance on, or release of the information contained in this report without the express written consent of Krazan is strictly prohibited and will be without risk or liability to Krazan.

Conclusions and recommendations contained in this report are based on the evaluation of information made available during the course of this assessment. It is not warranted that such data cannot be superseded by future environmental, legal, geotechnical or technical developments. Consequently, given the possibility for unanticipated hazardous conditions to exist on a subject site which may not have been discovered, this Phase I ESA is not intended as the basis for a buyer or developer of real property to waive their rights of recovery based upon environmental unknowns. Parties that choose to waive rights of recovery prior to site development do so at their own risk.

Parties who seek to rely upon Phase I Environmental Site Assessment reports dated more than 180 days prior to the date of reliance do so at their own risk. This limitation in reliance is based on the potential for physical changes at the site, changes in circumstances, technological and professional advances, and guidance related to the continued viability of Environmental Site Assessment reports, user’s responsibilities, and requirements for updating of components of the inquiry as stated in the ASTM Standard E 1527-21.

11.0 QUALIFICATIONS
This Phase I ESA was conducted under the supervision or responsible charge of Krazan’s undersigned environmental assessor with oversight from the undersigned environmental professional. The work was conducted in accordance with ASTM E 1527-21 guidance, generally accepted industry standards for environmental due diligence in place at the time of the preparation of this report, and Krazan’s qualitycontrol policies.

We declare that, to the best of our professional knowledge and belief, we meet the definition of environmental professional as defined in §312.10 of 40 CFR 312 and we have the specific qualifications McKinley Ranch Property
Project No. 014-24011
Fresno, California
Page No. 30
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. With Offices Serving the Western United States 014-24011 McKinley Ranch Property Phase I Report Final.docx based on education, training, and experience to assess a property of the nature, history, and setting of the subject property. We have developed and performed the all appropriate inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312.

Respectfully submitted,
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Kenneth R. Sani, REPA No. 872367 Environmental Project Manager Michael H. Bowery, PG
Senior Project Manager
KRS/MHB/mlt
(0wn04
47200044 -—
McKinley Ranch Property Project No. 014-24011
Fresno, California Page No. 31
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.

With Offices Serving the Western United States
014-24011 McKinley Ranch Property Phase I Report Final.docx

REFERENCES
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) Process, ASTM Designation: E 1527-21.

ASTM, Standard Guide for Vapor Encroachment Screening on Property Involved in Real Estate Transactions, ASTM Designation E 2600-10.

Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR), Aerial photographs, Microsoft® Research Maps.

Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR), Certified Sanborn Map Report.

Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR), City Directory Abstract.

Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR), Regulatory Database Report.

Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR), Topographic Map Report.

Fresno County Department of Community Health, Environmental Health System, Master Hazardous Materials Handling Facilities List, October 2023.

Fresno County Fire Protection District (FCFPD).

Fresno County Public Works and Development Department (FCPWDD).

State of California Department of Toxic Substances Control, Envirostor Website:
http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public
State of California Geologic Energy Management Division (CalGEM) Maps Website:
https://www.conservation.ca.gov/calgem/Pages/WellFinder.aspx State of California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Geotracker Website:
http://geotracker.swrcb.ca.gov
State of California, Department of Water Resources, Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) Data Viewer, Spring 2023, https://sgma.water.ca.gov/webgis/?appid=SGMADataViewer#gwlevels U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Map of Radon Zones.

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory Wetlands Mapper:
http://www.fws.gov/wetlands/Data/Mapper.html
U.S. Geological Survey, 7.5-minute Clovis, California topographic quadrangle map, 1964, photo inspected 1978.

Zaninovich, Jr., Mr. Vincent G., Trustee, one of the owners of the subject site.

McKinley Ranch Property Project No. 014-24011
Fresno, California Page No. 32
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.

With Offices Serving the Western United States
014-24011 McKinley Ranch Property Phase I Report Final.docx

GLOSSARY OF TERMS
Subject Site: The real property being investigated under this Phase I ESA.

Adjacent Properties: Properties which are contiguous with the subject site, or would be contiguous except for a street, road, or other public thoroughfare.

Subject Site Vicinity: Properties located within a 500-foot radius of the subject site.

Environmental Professional: A person meeting the education, training, and experience requirements as set forth in 40 CFR §312.10(b). The EP may be an independent contractor or an employee of the user.

User: The party seeking to use Practice E 1527 to complete an environmental site assessment of the subject site. A user may include, without limitation, a potential purchaser of the subject site, a potential tenant of the subject site, an owner of the subject site, a lender, or a property manager.

Recognized Environmental Condition (REC): In defining a standard of good commercial and customary practice for conducting an environmental site assessment of a parcel of property, the goal of the processes established by this practice is to identify recognized environmental conditions. The term recognized environmental conditions means the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property: (1) due to any release to the environment; (2) under conditions indicative of a release to the environment; or (3) under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment. De minimis conditions are not recognized environmental conditions.

Controlled Recognized Environmental Condition (CREC): A recognized environmental condition resulting from a past release of hazardous substances or petroleum products that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority (for example, as evidenced by the issuance of a no further action letter or equivalent, or meeting risk-based criteria established by regulatory authority), with hazardous substances or petroleum products allowed to remain in place subject to the implementation of required controls (for example, property use restrictions, activity and use limitations, institutional controls, or engineering controls). For example, if a leaking underground storage tank has been cleaned up to a commercial use standard, but does not meet unrestricted residential cleanup criteria, this would be considered a CREC. The “control” is represented by the restriction that the property use remain commercial. A condition considered by the environmental professional to be a CREC shall be listed in the findings section of the Phase I ESA report and as an REC in the conclusions section. A condition identified as a CREC does not imply that the environmental professional has evaluated or confirmed the adequacy, implementation, or continued effectiveness of the required control that has been, or is intended to be, implemented.

Historical Recognized Environmental Condition (HREC): A past release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products that has occurred in connection with the property and has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or meeting unrestricted use criteria established by a regulatory authority, without subjecting the property to any required controls (for example, property use restrictions, activity and use limitations, institutional controls, or engineering controls). Before calling the past release an HREC, the environmental professional must determine whether the past release is an REC at the time the Phase I ESA is conducted (for example, if there has been change in the regulatory criteria).

If the EP considers the past release to be an REC at the time the Phase I ESA is conducted, the condition shall be included in the conclusions section of the report as an REC.

McKinley Ranch Property Project No. 014-24011
Fresno, California Page No. 33
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.

With Offices Serving the Western United States
014-24011 McKinley Ranch Property Phase I Report Final.docx GLOSSARY OF TERMS (continued)
Potential Area of Concern (PAOC): A term adopted to provide an alternative designation to the REC and HREC for a range of environmental issues related to current subject site uses, historical subject site uses, or from adjacent and/or vicinity property uses. The PAOC is utilized to emphasize full disclosure and provide the User with conclusions and recommendations related to potential environmental issues in connection with the subject site based on Krazan’s professional experience in cases where official documentation or other evidence may be absent in order to identify an REC or HREC, thereby aiding the User’s considerations of environmental due diligence risk tolerance.

Migrate/migration: For the purposes of this practice, “migrate” and “migration” refer to the movement of hazardous substances or petroleum products in any form, including, for example, solid and liquid at the surface or subsurface, and vapor in the subsurface. Vapor migration in the subsurface is described in ASTM E 2600-10 guidance; however, nothing in the E 1527-21 practice should be construed to require application of the E 2600-10 standard to achieve compliance with AAI.

De minimis condition: A condition that generally does not present a threat to human health or the environment and that generally would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies. Condition determined to be de minimis conditions are not RECS or CRECs.

Data Gap: A lack of or inability to obtain information required by this practice despite good faith efforts by the Environmental Professional to gather such information. Data gaps may result from incompleteness in any of the activities required by this practice, including, but not limited to the site reconnaissance and interviews.

Data Failure: A failure to achieve the historical research objectives even after reviewing the standard historical sources that are reasonably ascertainable and likely to be useful. Data failure is one type of data gap.

City Of Fresno, Fresn
Date:

February 2024
Approved By:

KS
Figure No:
1 Scale:
1" = 2,000'
Drawn By:

DD
Project No:
014-24011

VICINITY MAP
McKinley Ranch Property
7298 East McKinley Avenue
APN 310-052-27 (4 Acres)
Fresno, California 93737
N Temperance A
N Fowler Ave
E Shields Ave E Shields Ave
N Armstrong Av
N Temperance Ave
E Floradora Ave
E Olive Ave
N Fowler Ave
N Sunnyside Ave N Sunnyside Ave
N Armstrong Ave
E Harvey Ave
E Clinton Ave
180
N De Wolf Ave
E Shields Ave
N Locan Ave
Mill Ditch
Fanche r Creek Canal
Briggs
Canal
N De Wolf Ave
E Clinton Ave E Clinton Ave
E McKinley Ave
E Belmont Ave
N Fancher Av
E Hedges Ave e
N Highland Ave
N Leonard Ave
E Olive Ave
E Bremer Ave
LEGEND
Subject Site Boundary
0 1,000 2,000 4,000
US Feet
¯
0 ___
Krazan

SITE DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS
With Offices Serving the Western United States
a
1I
City Of Fresno, Fresn
Date:

February 2024
Approved By:

KS
Figure No:
2 Scale:

NTS
Drawn By:

DD
Project No:
014-24011

PARCEL MAP
McKinley Ranch Property
7298 East McKinley Avenue
APN 310-052-27 (4 Acres)
Fresno, California 93737
LEGEND
Subject Site Boundary
RS 37-65
uj )
E.
(21)
E
19 112.67-
910 72-
*O
Q.
55‘ (28 uj 30 26- )
8 “I
’ r
30'^
DETAIL 'A' |
NTS ■NE COR LOT 18 60-^ I
/
s 2
t^CLUT[ON-
*
AVE.

S37 1S' 32‘ 541 76 U
(33) C.U.S.D.
3 @T 8 13}

19.72AC. (99)
17 2
F.M.F.C.D. I.F.C.D. I/LL “o MILL PITCH )) (48)T/
shaaordC0“4%
15 14
J G 11 %67^.3 74- 1323.86^ F.MF.CD._ (
31)T (05. F.M.F.C.D F.MFC.D.
®T ,
T80AC. 2
. 23.93AC.
= 9 @7 $
“ ^15.51A

19.80Ac.~ (32)T 2 FMECPo osac.2285201
- 619.53,/ /08A 57226705
6 24^0Ac21 22 0.05AC.
1 661.7 MILL DITCH 1 .26125
3- 398,7 sez 503.31
0v229 30
184.62^ s 205 3 /50363' [503 36- 2e40-
29 '30 2 (33
(6 3.98AC. T68Ac. 3.62Ac.

2.48Ac.
o
P
SEE
DETAIL 'A' .

F.M.F.C.D.
'^^)T

2.28Ac.
= RS 45-23
8 RS 39-97 1323.63-

23.50AC.
36 >
(27)
-20'
-30'
@ST
7619AC. F.M.F.C.D.
^F.M.F.C.D,
/ s I
—7. 1258 85'
(25)
on"
/36P
8v
^5.51 Ac?
2 Uj
Q
30- -

33.13 8
185.17' 5
d
so
RS 39-97
RS 45-23
SWCOR. 18
SEC. 26 18
4 8 8
■ ‘ 1323 46:
’ 7/
zL
“11 ”
O--30'
E. CLINTON
I
I
18 ^574/
Me KINLEY
18 .7 9L'
223 F.MFC.D.
(17)T O^OIAC.
'30
1 uj )
I
1304 OB11
8 1304 51-
40'^ -
3 12
•f
3 116.28Ad3
1305 --- 4
3 37 P Oi 14 7 — I Sr G 8
1306 53- 130040' L
F.M.F.C.D.
(39f)T
9 2
8 13QLST At
i
C.U.S.D.
8 @7
J 38.90Ac.s
E. 2
2726
34135
11/23^021
Krazan

SITE DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS
IVith Offices Serving the ITestern United States
Note - Assessor's Block Numbers Shown in Ellipses
Assessor's Parcel Numbers Shown in Circles
Kutner Colony - R.S. Bk. 2, Pg. 8
Record of Survey - Bk. 37, Pgs. 65-67
Record of Survey - Bk. 39, Pgs. 97-100
Record of Survey - Bk. 45, Pgs. 23-24
Record of Survey - Bk. 63, Pg. 6
Sub. of Sec. 26, T. 13S, R.21E. - Plat Bk. 2, Pg. 40 Assessor's Map Bk.310 - Pg.05 County of Fresno, Calif.

SUBDIVIDED LAND & SEC. 25 & 26, T13S., R21E., M.D.B.&M. 310-05 ujluj 88 y CC -
24\19 6y
25 30 oil
E. SHIELDS AVE. N
.KC. 1 1^800' uj
uj “I )
“I
23 24
26 25'

DETAIL 'B'
NTS
Tax Rate Area
5-396
5-457
76-052
-NOTEThis map is for Assessment purposes only.

It is not to be construed as portraying legal
ownership or divisions of land for purposes
of zoning or subdivision law.
8 m $(S'
r
a
83 N. LEONARD
)
m
N. HIGHLAND
88 &
N
rn
661 60' 641 60-_
(C
D

SITE MAP
7298 East McKinley Avenue
APN 310-052-27 (4 Acres)
Fresno, California 93737
Scale:

Drawn By:

Project No:

Date:

Approved By:

Figure No.:
1" = 250'
DD
014-24011
February 2024
KS
3 McKinley Ranch Property
LEGEND
Subject Site Boundary
Area of Former
Groundwater
Monitoring Wells
Occupied Residential
Dwelling
Unoccupied Residential
Dwelling
Pole-Mountain
Transformer
0 125 250 500
US Feet
¯
Former T.H.A.N. Site
Rural Residential
Stormwater
Retention Basin
Ponding Basin
Mill Ditch
Agricultural
East McKinley Avenue
Tree-Lined
Cobblestone Driveway
Area of Canopies,
Tables, and Benches
Area of Chicken Coops
and Piles of Tree Limbs
cr) —
'■ Li suidk
>1 —ee
A
sg J —
47- —
i
i to
-S s
ha !
— W
h i t R
mumootmapnasaal’
.7
PPT / 1 J.

JL-!1 1 ■
EP- (
4 ‘1
Osi Je 1 1
.nl-! pt r a
V ilid
/
r
I
Ares of Chicken Ceops
and Piles of Tree Libs
al
M.
7a
***** mD*y*ste*een*e*= •
*e44e0 *tm*eenstre ontesseacessnees «
****te**esses •
=*ne eeten **»«
*
"****** --utrnese sent eenoe**meses0m *==
****** ===ddndkenecsenmertecmmoc=Rc*****
r -I I
Tg,
Krazan

SITE DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS
With Offices Serving the Western United States
* f 2222222
e*s0*ps »***H+*M *( *e
a
■4
♦NMtere-ahe a Jeblnasseas.n d**e • mes eeeme eesosei
K
■ —
t —
. )
Au 1
f
B 1 91.1 . a
T
a
l
2 —“hl
MMIw 4
******te ********
****rte s
1 $222222.
>.
"edsre 5 on Wi
3- 1___ i
• **80*pensa*s*0mep**ss
-pbne**pss* B*s*e*n*es <
T772-2.%, astsse
• * ***sdepse
*==59*20**5
• pBsss ************* • ■ *0*09**30*8*
nesppsemens ponnppprsecorp*=e=nopose* ****** ***ssd 9093100930509** **00***- ***= assess penn*c**s*=mon**ss*****8
4*** torderprp*pppsspesespessset-te
pebontess *0s * ==s*4sae pa== * ******* • 4
*D*s 90**, pormeanpoo 90s opsgapgee *pp**e*****s*e =ereracno***mt*pee*e n*
*44099
oocece-, "er yes
# —=*gme #0900e*
gII
jsemsp*mapos * 4
o*******sgee
- nessoporsors M
=--—-emma fe
-B08**9050*/d*mrenpsoe semper ? Bsm*rs***e
5950*0 ne*sr s
— ===i • *ha 5.• — s =
L-B=s=sss08**
pp***0***e 9oe*9 =0350 #900900***04*800****
' 9* e 0st*s 55s - n *** B-s J
ilu r.mhs, mistmim a. aiiim mi.c — x 9 ——— —— i —===
mhnnrnp*st*e ******5
c0*0**********0,** **
« ptdppesmots s005 pnss
***==**per**=emme ne*
• **• 09s*oss *45340
•** ********* • penssse
—T2’’
M-th
.me. w w.ui ejanik ‘.inaaa —====*109*9****00*44
Photo 1:
address of 7298 East McKinley Avenue.

Northern facing view of on-site occupied residential dwelling with the subject site Photo 2:
adjacent to the north of the on-site residential dwelling.

View of the chickens, chicken coops, and wooden table and benches, located 7298 EAST MCKINLEY AVENUE

MCKINLEY RANCH PROPERTY
FRESNO, CALIFORNIA 93737
Project No. 014-24011
Date: February 2024
Approved by: KS With Offices Serving the Western United States

SITE DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS
IIA "
V t ■I
>
I
| 1h, '
" I
3e
* s
4 144.2
ME I
i
i.

V
ie
• s J
-- wi
Y
seh f
A
l
. T
■ Terw k A1t 1
At W
2 J'
9 I
ie
V
Ft
/
...f
&
£
■
J t f
Ai
j
— 7
a
JI
8 4 ? Be
el
l
7 /
hh#2
t
7 (
§
IJ
i l
0 t ! =
A ,
201
w .
eyls
2e
2 2
5 220, s ”
“,40
0533
X
) -
23 r
w
s 1■ H
R Sxatl aucet
I wasei
l jee
,,
:

I
■
' Us
■■ s
w8n0
FS oymh
- .)
0 ■
. ,,
. V i i —I
t
wbri ;
; ' e . 00 2’ re — . . e y . .
/ 1
= —

28. ...
(1.,
e
2 y
cfwac, ■
72 Photo 3: Western facing view of the unoccupied residential dwelling located adjacent to the southwest of the on-site occupied residential dwelling.

Photo 4: View of the domestic water well wooden barricades, and cactus plants, located adjacent to the west of the on-site occupied residential dwelling.

MCKINLEY RANCH PROPERTY
7298 EAST MCKINLEY AVENUE
FRESNO, CALIFORNIA 93737
Project No. 014-24011
Date: February 2024
Approved by: KS

SITE DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS
With Offices Serving the Western United States
P
A 4 —
Us8) a
1 A
l hs
■
-- . 1 ® p.
d it
-
I
r
n A --
E :

Or
■ ' <
—
*
3at ii
0" M f
ka se Adl
E t. ' s)f ete pour
y;
oe
i
% P
r
- Hr,
eer
' e
w
)‘
_ _ -
-
$
HI
2 H
♦
A1. VM
me*
Was
* - , . ts .

Tergr —2
Photo 5: Eastern facing view of the piles of tree limbs located in the northeastern of the subject site.

Photo 6: View of the canopies located in the northern portion of the subject site with planters, metal chicken feed bins, chicken coops, and plastic containers of grain, beneath them.

MCKINLEY RANCH PROPERTY
7298 EAST MCKINLEY AVENUE
FRESNO, CALIFORNIA 93737
Project No. 014-24011
Date: February 2024
Approved by: KS

SITE DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS
With Offices Serving the Western United States
ad—
-===
-er 5
towr
Ir Y
Y
A 1 areen. g g
V
x
V
J
l I
32 I I
0 RTER/
-
"Dry
-
? . the
Krazan
-
——u
etes ten
—
Tae
oee . y**
Pecg T- J
- ■ AAt.-irU, yale.

Photo 7: Northern facing view of the Mill ditch located along the northeastern boundary of the subject site.

Photo 8: View of the cobblestone driveway leading from McKinley Avenue to the on-site occupied residential dwelling.

MCKINLEY RANCH PROPERTY
7298 EAST MCKINLEY AVENUE
FRESNO, CALIFORNIA 93737
Project No. 014-24011
Date: February 2024
Approved by: KS

SITE DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS
With Offices Serving the Western United States
4 •33
d: ", - "
“"A “4r WeJse. WSE.
■ " A.0---Uesr , tog . Y
Pi
-- +
an
-
TSeo
Tois
y
..
5 -■ aw l , ' - 0=2 -
s
—
(
te
LA
t t
1 ■
t s
' i
. -
EsWaae aem i.
— —— L ?
s 7-v
- •
. Be •. . - At — -- -
geos "7
. ar - . , ■Ma
-
U... . wy
- - i
- • ■
PP
5 -
---
.. ■ •
s
—
ww
J& al9r3.
t.7 - .. ashsst0 1 ■
4 s
I
5 T
(
%|)7
( cl 209 FA MO L+rw t.
(t
J F 7 r / ar
o . .t
Photo 9: View of the chicken coops, metal drums containing grain an chicken feed, and a wooden pallet placed on block-lite masonry bricks, located in the northern portion of the subject site.

Photo 10: Northern facing view of that portion of the subject site located west of the on-site cobblestone driveway and south of the unoccupied residential dwelling.

MCKINLEY RANCH PROPERTY
7298 EAST MCKINLEY AVENUE
FRESNO, CALIFORNIA 93737
Project No. 014-24011
Date: February 2024
Approved by: KS

SITE DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS
With Offices Serving the Western United States
\ W/ \
1/2 1
1// k Y
L.

Ae
It. --- 344
t.

Krazan
alm—
2 _A
i I
=
' y ■ }
S seen —
Photo 11: Eastern facing view of the most easterly portion of the subject site lying south of the Mill Ditch.

Photo 12: View of the 50 pound sacks of grain and chicken feed placed on a wooden pallet and bock-lite masonry bricks located beneath a canopy in the northern portion of the subject site.

MCKINLEY RANCH PROPERTY
7298 EAST MCKINLEY AVENUE
FRESNO, CALIFORNIA 93737
Project No. 014-24011
Date: February 2024
Approved by: KS

SITE DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS
With Offices Serving the Western United States
\Y
V
k y Lr1
t V
23 i
aecm 3 tr ? -
*-
■
3 -
-----
5 -- s . el .3= omsneU -- F-)u
tilsas mkssSte
Krazan
77 J 7, 2 2
-
- tse
eeee- Chsmenem ■
-enn
&tn'
WKt
Naw I A
le
lys
er -
Sgt
T1,
I
. X .. ahes
.-3wee -P Tees ■
Appendix A
Certified Sanborn® Map Report
Inquiry Number:
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
McKinley Ranch Property 7298 E McKinley Avenue Fresno, CA 93737 January 19, 2024 7545227.3 EDR
Certified Sanborn® Map Report
Certified Sanborn Results:

Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, LLC or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
- page
The Sanborn Library includes more than 1.2 million
fire insurance maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris &
Browne, Hopkins, Barlow and others which track
historical property usage in approximately 12,000
American cities and towns. Collections searched:

Library of Congress
University Publications of America
EDR Private Collection
The Sanborn Library LLC Since 1866™
Limited Permission To Make Copies
Sanborn® Library search results
EDR Inquiry # Contact:

Site Name: Client Name:

Certification #
PO #
Project
01/19/24 7298 E McKinley Avenue McKinley Ranch Property Krazan & Associates, Inc. 215 West Dakota Fresno, CA 937377545227.3 Clovis, CA 93612 Ken Sani The Sanborn Library has been searched by EDR and maps covering the target property location as provided by Krazan & Associates, Inc. were identified for the years listed below. The Sanborn Library is the largest, most complete collection of fire insurance maps. The collection includes maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris & Browne, Hopkins, Barlow, and others. Only Environmental Data Resources Inc. (EDR) is authorized to grant rights for commercial reproduction of maps by the Sanborn Library LLC, the copyright holder for the collection. Results can be authenticated by visiting www.edrnet.com/sanborn.

The Sanborn Library is continually enhanced with newly identified map archives. This report accesses all maps in the collection as of the day this report was generated. 54BD-4163-848E NA UNMAPPED PROPERTY 01424011 This report certifies that the complete holdings of the Sanborn Library, LLC collection have been searched based on client supplied target property information, and fire insurance maps covering the target property were not found.

Certification #: 54BD-4163-848E
Krazan & Associates, Inc. (the client) is permitted to make up to FIVE photocopies of this Sanborn Map transmittal and each fire insurance map accompanying this report solely for the limited use of its customer. No one other than the client is authorized to make copies. Upon request made directly to an EDR Account Executive, the client may be permitted to make a limited number of additional photocopies. This permission is conditioned upon compliance by the client, its customer and their agents with EDR's copyright policy; a copy of which is available upon request.

This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, LLC. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. This Report is provided on an “AS IS”, “AS AVAILABLE” basis. NO WARRANTY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT.

ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, LLC AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES AND THIRD PARTY SUPPLIERS DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, OF ANY

KIND OR NATURE, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS REPORT OR ANY OF THE DATA AND INFORMATION PROVIDED IN

THIS REPORT, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES REGARDING ACCURACY, QUALITY, CORRECTNESS, COMPLETENESS,

COMPREHENSIVENESS, SUITABILITY, MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, TITLE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, MISAPPROPRIATION, OR OTHERWISE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, LLC OR ITS

SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES OR THIRD PARTY SUPPLIERS BE LIABLE TO ANYONE FOR ANY DIRECT, INCIDENTAL, INDIRECT, SPECIAL,

CONSEQUENTIAL OR OTHER DAMAGES OF ANY TYPE OR KIND (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO LOSS OF PROFITS, LOSS OF USE, OR LOSS OF DATA), ARISING OUT OF OR IN ANY WAY CONNECTED WITH THIS REPORT OR ANY OF THE DATA AND INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS REPORT.

Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels, or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only an assessment performed by a qualified environmental professional can provide findings, opinions or conclusions regarding the environmental risk or conditions in, on or at any property.

Copyright 2024 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. 7545227 3 2 //
EDR*
fanbuT 1710
EDR Historical Topo Map Report
Inquiry Number:
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
with QuadMatch™
McKinley Ranch Property 7298 E McKinley Avenue Fresno, CA 93737 January 19, 2024 7545227.4 EDR
EDR Historical Topo Map Report
EDR Inquiry #
Search Results:

P.O.#
Project:

Maps Provided:

Latitude:

Longitude:

UTM Zone:

UTM X Meters:

UTM Y Meters:

Elevation:

Contact:

Site Name: Client Name:
2021
2018
2015
2012
1981
1972
1964
1947
1946
1923
01/19/24 McKinley Ranch Property Krazan & Associates, Inc. 7298 E McKinley Avenue 215 West Dakota Fresno, CA 93737 Clovis, CA 93612 7545227.4 Ken Sani EDR Topographic Map Library has been searched by EDR and maps covering the target property location as provided by Krazan & Associates, Inc. were identified for the years listed below. EDR’s Historical Topo Map Report is designed to assist professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDRs Historical Topo Map Report includes a search of a collection of public and private color historical topographic maps, dating back to the late 1800s.

NA 36.766692 36° 46' 0" North 01424011 -119.658384 -119° 39' 30" West Zone 11 North 262722.38 4072287.42 351.73' above sea level This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, LLC. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. This Report is provided on an “AS IS”, “AS AVAILABLE” basis. NO WARRANTY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT.

ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, LLC AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES AND THIRD PARTY SUPPLIERS DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, OF ANY

KIND OR NATURE, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS REPORT OR ANY OF THE DATA AND INFORMATION PROVIDED IN

THIS REPORT, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES REGARDING ACCURACY, QUALITY, CORRECTNESS, COMPLETENESS,

SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES OR THIRD PARTY SUPPLIERS BE LIABLE TO ANYONE FOR ANY DIRECT, INCIDENTAL, INDIRECT, SPECIAL,

7.5-minute, 24000
2021
Malaga

7.5-minute, 24000
2018 Source Sheets
2018
Clovis

7.5-minute, 24000
2018
Malaga

7.5-minute, 24000
2015 Source Sheets
2015
Clovis

7.5-minute, 24000
2015
Malaga

7.5-minute, 24000
2012 Source Sheets
2012
Clovis

7.5-minute, 24000
2012
Malaga

7.5-minute, 24000
7545227 4 3
/ -
*
__
n u
TT08
y
page
Topo Sheet Key
This EDR Topo Map Report is based upon the following USGS topographic map sheets. -
1981 Source Sheets
1981
Clovis

7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1978
1981
Malaga

7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1978
1972 Source Sheets
1972
Clovis

7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1972
1972
Malaga

7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1972
1964 Source Sheets
1964
Malaga

7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1962
1964
Clovis

7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1962
1947 Source Sheets
1947
Clovis

7.5-minute, 24000
1947
Malaga

7.5-minute, 24000
7545227 4 4
f

21. — -
4 s
5 —
E H
*
5 frat
with1
l

1. IMtrig w ep
F■
ph
3 % 4-
H
TA
Pua
“hz
• i
H, T1
page
Topo Sheet Key
This EDR Topo Map Report is based upon the following USGS topographic map sheets. -
1946 Source Sheets
1946
Malaga

7.5-minute, 24000
1946
Clovis

7.5-minute, 24000
1923 Source Sheets
1923
Clovis

7.5-minute, 31680
1923
Malaga

7.5-minute, 31680
7545227 4 5
11 4 -
—— -i
1 —
r ■ .

X
— M —17] WltH t tr ftl
H I
J
ih i4 - _
—
,.3
t 4
L r
■ y miiiseat
a
A—
Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:

ADDRESS:

CLIENT:

This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
W E

SW S SE

NW N NE
2021 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 McKinley Ranch Property 7298 E McKinley Avenue Fresno, CA 93737 Krazan & Associates, Inc.

TP, Clovis, 2021, 7.5-minute
S, Malaga, 2021, 7.5-minute
7545227 4 6

E CLINTON AVE
23 AVE
— Redbank
Slough
^cib
0 26 1 I
x
350
I
W
CBurness p. Mill Ditch
3350— EMC KINLEY AVCr'^}
350 cld= On
Temperance Ditch
8 (505 C350) ■
I
7 t
24 Cu

N JEWEL AVE
||||H

E TULARE AVE
AC WAY [
T
^350-
E DAKOTA AVE 22 99) X
47-
3501
-350-
1 LL . — I

E SHIELDS AVE
35050 —
) - 3350—)
07592 C
•[ 9
&
FRESNO

E BELMONT AVE
JI 1
3 X
180)
%
“pL
O

E HARVEY AVE
34 Mill Ditch

E FLORADORA AVE
O 7

EHEDGES AVE

E OLIVE AVE
& 35.
2 -350-
pt
8 E BREME®
EEC

E DAYTON
J
E 1
I
-NJ»
i
EDR’
1 N LEONARD AVE
U1--------- i------------- .1 M NLOCANAVE N DE WO LEAVE N LOCAN AVE °US PARK AV\

MPERANCE AVE
E Br Ditch
TI
Oo
F SANDERs 1
o
\F AVE
NARMSTRONG![AVEN TEMPERANCE AVE

N FOWLER AVE

N FANCHER AVE
O
Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:

ADDRESS:

CLIENT:

This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
W E

SW S SE

NW N NE
2018 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 McKinley Ranch Property 7298 E McKinley Avenue Fresno, CA 93737 Krazan & Associates, Inc.

TP, Clovis, 2018, 7.5-minute
S, Malaga, 2018, 7.5-minute
7545227 4 7
-
—
AVE

EDAYTON
C
J
[
I 27
%s
s
Temperance Ditch

E OLIVE AVE
AVE
111
Burness
-350
EMC KINLEY AVE O1
o
O

EHEDGES AVE

E BELMONT AVE
E
III1 11- E SHIELDS AVE
T
I
II
Fancher Cr Canal
3 1
*
% 1-

E FLORADORA AVE
Mill DitcH
E PON T/4 c [

E DAKOTA AVE
'TON AVE

E TULARE AVE
24 •R-edbli
Redbank
Slough
25E CLINTON AVE
E I
I
-NJ»
I
EDR’
( AVE

N LOCAN AVE
S
NAPPLEGAre,,

N TEMPERANCE AVE
N

N LEONARD AVE
3AVJ10M 30N
( /
X

N FANCHER AVE N
O

NARMSTRONG

N FOWLER

N TEMPERANCE AVE
Hog
r
Al

N LOCAN AVE
TT
^SANDERS CT
<0‘
7 WOLF AVE
Historical Topo Map
page
CLIENT:

ADDRESS:

SITE NAME:

This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
E
W

SW S SE NW N NE
2015
0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5
Krazan & Associates, Inc.

Fresno, CA 93737
7298 E McKinley Avenue
McKinley Ranch Property
S, Malaga, 2015, 7.5-minute
TP, Clovis, 2015, 7.5-minute
75452274 8
N

N FOWLER AVE

N DE WOLF AVEO
I
N FANCHER AVE %
"4

1. ||
L
।
7 3

ERSCT C T
T
DE
AVE

N ARMSTRONG AVE AVE /

N TEMPERANCE AVE
I

N TEMPERANCE AVE
7 TT/
I
T
N LOCAN AVE I LeL
/

N FOWLER AVE
O.
m | l
/ 11
J
/ /I
\
N Dog
N
S
/
/ —\
(Qma2
1 V
E PRINCETON AVE Lu II
1 IL \KOTA AVEE DAi
T

FOLIVE AVE
TI

E HARVEY AVE

E BELMONT AVE

E OLIVE AVE
■
SPNE AVE — 081
oun50 -avo"D4 3
10 Os,
26 E CLINTON AVE
'MUl.D.itch^
o9C
Burness
E
T
Mill Ditch

FLORADORA AVE
—
V
\
N 1 Temperance Dit^h
GC
I
E / ppewe"

E HEDGES AVE
Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:

ADDRESS:

CLIENT:

This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
W E

SW S SE

NW N NE
2012 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 McKinley Ranch Property 7298 E McKinley Avenue Fresno, CA 93737 Krazan & Associates, Inc.

TP, Clovis, 2012, 7.5-minute
S, Malaga, 2012, 7.5-minute
7545227 4 9
X
E
/

E OLIVE AVE

E DAKOTA AVE
[ 1
YY mpg
5 /
O
350
E TULARE AVE —
O
-
40 s
l C
2 1

AVE REEN
.0. — :
'BEIM,ONT AV£
sP cG y
8 «r
<6
-Mil/
O
—
3sO.

E HEDGES^AVE
E OLIVE.AVE"
n
f Di
o
t
0)
O
Q
—
1 E HARVEY AVE
£ BELMONT AVE
)
RANCHER CO CANAL-—
A=
!
I ctLN
P
MjlLDi.tch. \
—
f

ORA AVE E FLORADORA AVE

E OLIVE AVE
IN
Mill Ditch Burness f MCKINLEY AVE
0ksJ
(A)
O
1 A
1 1
r
E I
I
-N*
I
EDR

N TEMPE RANCE-AVE
J IL
/
DO
\N HORNFT A VE
0 - N DE
N ARMSTRONG.AVE

TT N LEONARD AVE
/
/
/
7 i
7 '3AV /TOM 30 N
N~L 0 CA N-A VECo
CO
I
Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:

ADDRESS:

CLIENT:

This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
W E

SW S SE

NW N NE
1981 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 McKinley Ranch Property 7298 E McKinley Avenue Fresno, CA 93737 Krazan & Associates, Inc.

TP, Clovis, 1981, 7.5-minute
S, Malaga, 1981, 7.5-minute
7545227 4 10
N
well
358.
7 I
GOULD
23 k
LINTON
DITCH 1345 Pester MCKINLEY
A TCHISON ‘ * -'TOPEKA' SANT.

TEMPERANCE OITCH • ■
Burness
= ' AND354
Well I
348 DAKOTA •
-------1 AVE 22
i
a
,342 346 CORPORATE BDY
Well
358
1 I
i Well
35/
0350
I
i
L
..
—
E
a=356__
y
S
ell
34 334 338 . ■ ‘ 339 AVE ■ 36
... I . tv
HARVEY 11 -AVE AM r
1 i CREEK
—=
/346 233 .4 AVE ,
*
II ; .I 7 O p..
ii
=
O Well.
1 Belmont
i Country Club u- •V
9 15 O
fl' "’•TULARE’• I
■■ " .
6 345 ••
-342 1:1
Well
it
• ”
y
S❖
. i
Y
7)
o
Well
34/
3 38‘ - - A VE
2:::
- 344
345
Well
6 a
.63
(.

It
II
II
II
II
w
W
A
G
o o
II
II
C*c
35s -OLIVE
II
II

BELMONT
r
* Temperance-Kutner " • ' —
Sch '■
..
.3 /0
-
.0__
1 • :
1 n
— OTc., 341
FLORA DORA AVE -- i
Well
' y0" 4$ %7
o 1
332
335
-
-c -u
'"\AVE
: FRESNO
E I
I
-N*
I
EDR’
C.^LEONARD
' 1‘
l’II
- 11 .

PPIt
II
88N 2.

C
—ir
L
m
m.

DE WOLF
I I | I
re

ARMSTRONG
* 0.
w
(O
OLO
0 . ::
r
Q:

TEMPERANCt || 1______________ h-
Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:

ADDRESS:

CLIENT:

This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
W E

SW S SE

NW N NE
1972 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 McKinley Ranch Property 7298 E McKinley Avenue Fresno, CA 93737 Krazan & Associates, Inc.

TP, Clovis, 1972, 7.5-minute
S, Malaga, 1972, 7.5-minute
7545227 4 11
— Pester | MCKINLEY

ATCHISON' SA
TEMPERANCE ^•rcH
345 el 34/
335 1, FLORADORA AVE .. I
|34 -.350-
338 35» T)LIVE - | 36....

L
| 334 339

1. 5
340 349
AVEHARVEY O‘
SP
'A
j 233 ‘ BEJ-MONT 346 AVE' " “I
I
An
Well?
Ir
K)
■ CANAL TULARE•. - - A VE ‘ O o
.1 342
345
Well
344
338-
2 Wen
350
• Belmont
'i Country Club
I
r
..

Well
34/
Burness
A^D3
.9
* Temperance-Kutner
Sch
- .[345 -
“ TOPEKAJ
II
332 0 |
!
AVE
7 “Nc,
• :
' •
'• l ,
——
“c, .
7 _PY. / )
-45-
Well
3 3
355
25 AVE
Well
362
DITCH
LINTON 539
S
’ J.

Well
ol
«%
A"
I
Well I
I
GOULD
356
360 ------- 1 AVE
22 1 .23
y i
L/e
I
SHIELDS 3^ Y “ AVE 356
Well
358
u
S
S
-
x wellWell
OT>sT^------- x ...
5?
DAKOTA
I
FRESNO 14. CORPORATE
nn-=
350
1: ■ :94 348
Tr 354
1 ।
E I
I
-NJ»
I
EDR’
J70M ;
O

TEMPERANCE
: •
m
NJO’

ARMSTRONG
O
o
FOWLER
LOCAN.
s
Q
Ol NO

LEONARD
O.

C
Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:

ADDRESS:

CLIENT:

This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
W E

SW S SE

NW N NE
1964 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 McKinley Ranch Property 7298 E McKinley Avenue Fresno, CA 93737 Krazan & Associates, Inc.

TP, Clovis, 1964, 7.5-minute
S, Malaga, 1964, 7.5-minute
7545227 4 12
PesterBurness
TEMPERANCE ^ITCH
345
SANTAS
— MC-KINLEY ‘ 2
4—
Ak 1o
43 2
I!
f
360
25 355
Al
O) CA
r
■
350
__ "J
Well
362
35/_—-
350.

AVE _
39 —----a
1 P
I
I
I____
Well
358
Well
GOULD
AVE 22
’S,
—SHIEL B1
Well
O
340 / ■.
y
"3
d.

CREEK
V% ,0% ■ “I
Well
34!
it:::::::
"r,
iii
OF. peP
L350-
36 11
AVE
a Well
350
____ 345
Well
35 OLIVE
LINTON 339
34 339
•=’
AVE •

BELMONT
1 I
|
I
I
348 DAKOTA
’S. I
1 "AVE1 s 3~5O~

FRESNO CORPORATE
Well
351
s
A TCH/sdlN'
-
1 1J ell
335 FLORADORA
334 33& .

HARVEY
Ite
II 333
T: )l 13 1
D
It 1 II
Er 1
in 1
335 60
8 0
s
Weir' o74 k
s II
S
o, O
TULARE "CAN 2 U o 6
-- .342
' 2
332 $/3 It
II
II
II
G
O
Belmont ; K
i Country Club io
o
WV
Temperance-Kutner
Sch
II
II
H
ii
II
—
o Well n-
====== 344
G
o o
7 r — ■ J" 1
• 338- - - A VE
E I
I
-NJ»
I
EDR’
A
WOLF
t
0%
||
(/
t
U
.(O
CXI
o]
N
:)
I
O

TEMPERANCE
■
02 )
9 5 LEONARD
O.
i
AVE
8 m
8 os C (D •
O—-
-il
.0
11 JU
H
2 N
L 41,

ARMSTRONG
O
4 H FOWLER
1 Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:

ADDRESS:

CLIENT:

This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
W E

SW S SE

NW N NE
1947 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 McKinley Ranch Property 7298 E McKinley Avenue Fresno, CA 93737 Krazan & Associates, Inc.

TP, Clovis, 1947, 7.5-minute
S, Malaga, 1947, 7.5-minute
7545227 4 13
_^J^WINMrTEL~
l< ■Redbt nk .

I
-
(
C )
("27 .25.. AVENUE ==
26 C (
<<
Kutner
DJ.TCH 346 MCKINLEY
336 P B
T
Forthcam urness A
• C
TEMPERANCE oITCH O,
u
AVE •
y
:50 44136— ----- -Ir— 34 AVENUE 35 4 a
\ 11
HARVEY \ AVE
===== YO = •
)
EO, I
332 AVENUE
137 A
1 "4II
u. / 350. Il
(
"—330 / 7 H •
/C
2 w 1
//
A VENUE -‘c
|
II
II
II
©
"it*
I
ll
II
II
II
J
II
II
II
Ri
ii
II
H
II
Q
u
II
II
II
II
II
II
IIII
n
n
—r 3469 '
ffs
2Lu
9 ==A
11 II
II
JL
-----
II
L=== ■
II
II
CANAL 3
’Temperance "■
Sch
‘sii
II
===7 II
351 IL
===4
2// E4WEAA

1. IT
PD
RA
IVE
1 —+
/
=======
' AN id
22 DAKO'

AVEI IE
E I
I
-N*
I
EDR’
MC FARL.

O ir
21 HERGENSRODER
4s
/
9 2
-
/
(i11
m■
i
O()s
v
I
JL
al v
• TEMPERANCE
ji /!
/ 1 ___ j
f

DE WOLF
I

LEONARD
-"7
1 II
—

ARMSTRONG
FOWLER
Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:

ADDRESS:

CLIENT:

This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
W E

SW S SE

NW N NE
1946 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 McKinley Ranch Property 7298 E McKinley Avenue Fresno, CA 93737 Krazan & Associates, Inc.

TP, Clovis, 1946, 7.5-minute
S, Malaga, 1946, 7.5-minute
7545227 4 14
342 352
edb. nk 1<
N
)
-
■27 4VENUE ===25==
26 C (
ct
)
C. n
\ Kutner
DIICH Mj AVENUE
336 1 C Forthcamp SA
\ O a r _TEMPERA NCE
I u
AVE
[
()
) 1i" 2D t5O 4416-4 -----—1-77-----------------
34 A VENUE 35 4 T

HP HARVEY AVE O
”, ■ Q
150,
AVENUE 351 w. 332 3469 V
T
//
/
u. I
1350
(
J
------330 ul
340
5 3 II
2 1
ii
11IFFY
\
\
I
I
I
II
II •
uu
r
)
—F
ll
Ii..

II
JL
-
I)
U
==CANAL
346
Burhess W
t
ii
ii
II
II
II
INLEY ■
TAPET
II
II
===
ll
35i ;j
=====
s_
pITCH
/
(
■ll
ll
L===
■
f
. C
ll
ll
II29
II
II
II
. ■ ll
-=-------------—------------ 1
"Temperance ■
Seh
)
a
AND
RA
IVE
=
DAKO 22
==: .

AV Ei IE
E I
I
-N*
I
EDR’

ARMSTRONG
FOWLER
—

U/ MCFARLANE
JL
6 2
1 DE WOLF

HERGENSRODER
I /
9 1
/
/
F
9 TEMPE^ANCE //
m
CM
LEONARD ------ 5---
—
77 II-----
Y
11 I
fl
LiI
|
IIv
Historical Topo Map
page
CLIENT:

ADDRESS:

SITE NAME:

This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
E
W

SW S SE NW N NE
1923
0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5
Krazan & Associates, Inc.

Fresno, CA 93737
7298 E McKinley Avenue
McKinley Ranch Property
S, Malaga, 1923, 7.5-minute
TP, Clovis, 1923, 7.5-minute
75452274 15
r
/
।
Jii
3 .
/
I
)
/

ARMSTRONG
)N-/
N
/
fl
a
I
E WOLF
\
"IoU)
T
\
I/
5 |
. LEONAS
(
7 |
V
\
) -
J
/
(\
( JA
:
/
NU1
//
\
V
NI
ri1 ()
G//
N
•
CD
19 /
f
=:=!
11 , !!
1 1
/
/
><
sN
/
A
NN
CmXT
8 //
J.
/
J
G
m
N
1 =*=
1 J
11"
t)1111
A
s
/ ’’
==-=L= \ I
—vy!
=
*

Y)/I V/
)\k
C
/
1 ft
(Qma2
IW
II \ ) 11
36 " of 35 II
—
I
OS II / I!
II
n
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
IL
JRN3A9' Zee
88 IOOHPS
tBdodUtL
■ U
—
I
)
F AZIN IM 3DN3AV
McKinley Ranch Property
7298 E McKinley Avenue
Fresno, CA 93737
Inquiry Number: 7545227.5
January 19, 2024
The EDR-City Directory Abstract
6 Armstrong Road
Shelton, CT 06484
800.352.0050 EDR Environmental Data Resources Inc www.edrnet.com

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION
Executive Summary
Findings
City Directory Images
Thank you for your business.

Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.

Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, LLC. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. This Report is provided on an “AS IS”, “AS AVAILABLE” basis. NO WARRANTY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA

RESOURCES, LLC AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES AND THIRD PARTY SUPPLIERS DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, OF

ANY KIND OR NATURE, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS REPORT OR ANY OF THE DATA AND

INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS REPORT, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES REGARDING

ACCURACY, QUALITY, CORRECTNESS, COMPLETENESS, COMPREHENSIVENESS, SUITABILITY, MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, TITLE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, MISAPPROPRIATION, OR OTHERWISE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, LLC OR ITS SUBSIDIARIES,

AFFILIATES OR THIRD PARTY SUPPLIERS BE LIABLE TO ANYONE FOR ANY DIRECT, INCIDENTAL, INDIRECT, SPECIAL,

CONSEQUENTIAL OR OTHER DAMAGES OF ANY TYPE OR KIND (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO LOSS OF PROFITS,

LOSS OF USE, OR LOSS OF DATA), ARISING OUT OF OR IN ANY WAY CONNECTED WITH THIS REPORT OR ANY OF THE DATA AND INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS REPORT. Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels, or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only an assessment performed by a qualified environmental professional can provide findings, opinions or conclusions regarding the environmental risk or conditions in, on or at any property.

Copyright 2023 by Environmental Data Resources, LLC. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, LLC, or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.

EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, LLC or its affiliates.

All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

DESCRIPTION
Environmental Data Resources, Inc.’s (EDR) City Directory Abstract is a screening tool designed to assist environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities.

EDR’s City Directory Abstract includes a search and abstract of available city directory data. For each address, the directory lists the name of the corresponding occupant at approximately five year intervals.

Business directories including city, cross reference and telephone directories were reviewed, if available, at approximately five year intervals for the years spanning 1922 through current. This report compiles information gathered in this review by geocoding the latitude and longitude of properties identified and gathering information about properties within 660 feet of the target property.

Summary information obtained is provided in the text of this report.

RECORD SOURCES
The EDR City Directory Report accesses a variety of business directory sources, including Haines, InfoUSA, Polk,Cole, Bresser, and Stewart. Listings marked as EDR Digital Archive access Cole and InfoUSA records.

The various directory sources enhance and complement each other to provide a more thorough and accurate report.

EDR is licensed to reproduce certain City Directory works by the copyright holders of those works. The purchaser of this EDR City Directory Report may include it in report(s) delivered to a customer.

RESEARCH SUMMARY
The following research sources were consulted in the preparation of this report. An "X" indicates where information was identified in the source and provided in this report.

Year Source TP Adjoining Text Abstract Source Image
2020 EDR Digital Archive X - X -
2017 Cole Information X - X -
2014 Cole Information X X X -
2010 Cole Information - X X -
2005 Cole Information X X X -
2002 R.L. Polk & Co Publishers - - - -
2000 Cole Information X - X -
1996 R.L. Polk & Co Publishers X - X -
1995 Cole Information X - X -
1992 Cole Information - - - -
1990 R.L. Polk & Co Publishers - - - -
1986 R.L. Polk & Co Publishers - - - -
1980 R.L. Polk & Co Publishers - - - -
1975 R.L. Polk & Co Publishers - - - -
1970 R.L. Polk & Co Publisher - - - -
1965 R.L. Polk & Co Publisher - - - -
7545227- 5 Page 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Year Source TP Adjoining Text Abstract Source Image
1962 R. L. Polk & Co. - - - -
1958 R. L. Polk & Co. - - - -
1952 R.L. Polk & Co Publishers - - - -
1947 R.L. Polk & Co Publishers - - - -
1942 R.L. Polk & Co Publishers - - - -
1937 R.L. Polk & Co Publishers - - - -
1932 R.L. Polk & Co Publishers - - - -
1927 Cole Information - - - -
1922 Polk-Husted Directory Co. - - - -
7545227- 5 Page 2

FINDINGS

TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION

ADDRESS
7298 E McKinley Avenue
Fresno, CA 93737

FINDINGS DETAIL
Target Property research detail.

E MCKINLEY AVE
7298 E MCKINLEY AVE
Year Uses Source
2020 CHASE LENTZ EDR Digital Archive
TRACY LENTZ EDR Digital Archive
2017 AILIN LEE Cole Information
2014 KELLY BARNES-MCCUE Cole Information
2005 VINCENT ZANINOVICH Cole Information
2000 JOHN SLAVICH Cole Information
1995 SLAVICH, JOHN JR Cole Information

MCKINLEY AVE
7298 MCKINLEY AVE
Year Uses Source
1996 Slavich John 9707 R R.L. Polk & Co Publishers
7545227- 5 Page 3

FINDINGS

ADJOINING PROPERTY DETAIL
The following Adjoining Property addresses were researched for this report. Detailed findings are provided for each address.

E MCKINLEY AVE
7270 E MCKINLEY AVE
Year Uses Source
2014 MARTHA DELANCEY Cole Information
2010 MARTHA DELANCEY Cole Information
2005 MATIAS TRISTAN Cole Information
7545227- 5 Page 4

FINDINGS
ADJOINING PROPERTY: ADDRESSES NOT IDENTIFIED IN RESEARCH SOURCE The following Adjoining Property addresses were researched for this report, and the addresses were not identified in research source.

Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 7270 E MCKINLEY AVE 2020, 2017, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1990, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1970, 1965, 1962, 1958, 1952, 1947, 1942, 1937, 1932, 1927, 1922 7270 E MCKINLEY AVE 2020, 2017, 2014, 2002, 2000, 1996, 1995, 1992, 1990, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1970, 1965, 1962, 1958, 1952, 1947, 1942, 1937, 1932, 1927, 1922 TARGET PROPERTY: ADDRESS NOT IDENTIFIED IN RESEARCH SOURCE The following Target Property addresses were researched for this report, and the addresses were not identified in the research source.

Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 7298 E McKinley Avenue 2010, 2002, 1992, 1990, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1970, 1965, 1962, 1958, 1952, 1947, 1942, 1937, 1932, 1927, 1922
The EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package
McKinley Ranch Property 7298 E McKinley Avenue Fresno, CA 93737 Inquiry Number: January 19, 2024 7545227.8 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
Toll Free: 800.352.0050
EDR
www.edrnet.com
2020 1"=500' Flight Year: 2020 USDA/NAIP
2016 1"=500' Flight Year: 2016 USDA/NAIP
2012 1"=500' Flight Year: 2012 USDA/NAIP
2009 1"=500' Flight Year: 2009 USDA/NAIP
2006 1"=500' Flight Year: 2006 USDA/NAIP
1998 1"=500' Acquisition Date: September 12, 1998 USGS/DOQQ 1987 1"=500' Flight Date: June 17, 1987 USDA
1984 1"=500' Flight Date: June 09, 1984 USDA
1979 1"=500' Flight Date: September 04, 1979 USDA
1973 1"=500' Flight Date: May 08, 1973 USDA
1967 1"=500' Flight Date: May 02, 1967 USDA
1962 1"=500' Flight Date: August 09, 1962 USGS
1957 1"=500' Flight Date: August 15, 1957 USDA
1950 1"=500' Flight Date: January 31, 1950 USDA
1946 1"=500' Flight Date: April 22, 1946 USGS
1937 1"=500' Flight Date: October 05, 1937 USDA
EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package 01/19/24 McKinley Ranch Property Site Name: Client Name: Krazan & Associates, Inc. 7298 E McKinley Avenue 215 West Dakota Fresno, CA 93737 Clovis, CA 93612 EDR Inquiry # 7545227.8 Contact: Ken Sani Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) Aerial Photo Decade Package is a screening tool designed to assist environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR’s professional researchers provide digitally reproduced historical aerial photographs, and when available, provide one photo per decade. Search Results: Year Scale Details Source
When delivered electronically by EDR, the aerial photo images included with this report are for ONE TIME USE ONLY. Further reproduction of these aerial photo images is prohibited without permission from EDR. For more information contact your EDR Account Executive. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice Copyright 2024 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.

EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, LLC or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. 7545227 - 8 page 2 This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, LLC. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. This Report is provided on an “AS IS”, “AS AVAILABLE” basis. NO WARRANTY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT.

ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, LLC AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES AND THIRD PARTY SUPPLIERS DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, OF ANY

KIND OR NATURE, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS REPORT OR ANY OF THE DATA AND INFORMATION PROVIDED IN

THIS REPORT, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES REGARDING ACCURACY, QUALITY, CORRECTNESS, COMPLETENESS,

SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES OR THIRD PARTY SUPPLIERS BE LIABLE TO ANYONE FOR ANY DIRECT, INCIDENTAL, INDIRECT, SPECIAL,

EDR
7545227.8 2020 = 500'
INQUIRY#:

YEAR: 1 N,8 (EDR
■e
< 1 1,
A7.
i
ti
8’22
1 " ■ »♦ t’s
1 . I a ‘ fl Pemert 8 is •I
I* sh “arp
i
I
eAssseasaisassaitasem
22210 2199 2h0nsetene
s toose4s601
■ l Hi
K II « 9.
worNdtonede "••Mm*«••• i.••ml.. M MM ■ H. Mi llIlllllllllllHirll, ansttsudssesce 222212202528ddoooocoooooocammumnr
.7 oa t $ ral
_M2202mmmmmoeuov0000020200323377
: 2...
» UtIMMMtin mitem
1 W iA
| Je
¥ .9
e =4 fhitesstrsenmee Pm.
t
EH
f 4
!
FF"B- fie | s• * we
g
i
|
Ht
t - • t
4 :

P ♦ T !
— t ) s 1
I
I
$ Ilt Ll
*
I € -I X I
2 >
- rx
• k
s 484 t II
•r
Lf_ * I Msr- 6 aann. W as ana.
=
-
i
I
ar—■
",
I
I
S
£i ■;
" ' HMMIMlli ,
■LMMHllttlMuiHnai
« "OIIIUIIIMIXIll
zIIlliliiiiilii «
i
i
as Pas 22
ts
^tHIMHMIKMMMMnn,,!!..,,.,..
t HKltljtiniin.itMloiu.,... ,
.......... .......... ........... ...........
j MaaaMaaiiMaiMtaM-* .. ........... f "lUiniiiiaiiiiiin • ie —res
I “eg. qe s88s
mg '■MillliiliiiilUlliallaalliiiiiJ, . """•M 4" ••Mp.MM.iiauiM - . “ "50 “hesmr
d --w 2I—g
ihi.................. •IMl'll'l H M M.*.'i.
7545227.8 2016 = 500'
INQUIRY#:

YEAR: 1 N,8 (EDR
il.W. Ai sme $
I, t ihmo
f
l
I 7 e ‘,--*‘‘--‘-999 liUlllllllUlllllU • HUH is "ISepe Norvovesuervi ; 11 lb e
s
4 •u
lift || » j ।
«
yi
1 tenereeereooseenseeneni • onerssee sessee «•«(■!<*
t -aagsi
y Pe02
coteeessss
<
AW’***** ***••*••*“
• i
4 )
wt ' Ie
---it “22
) jeis
I
L
4 1 ’
M
2411
m’*
y Ri
J l LA
4 1
s - - s ■--------5 5.
! i
—t*nmuserettcesg 4 to - P. *
4 -— !
3 '-* - a. 2 ; ----- IMP £6 jeres 11 ........ .. a ng povewes - MMYA s (e » I Psohe
I
I
I I t. 31
- .
! £3 • 1
*
bl
*
I'll!,
| es Illi.’ Iff I J
-. SR il 4 %'
I
193 ***" “ 7 “ "l"Fw
h
iI
J
• <•■••••■ (titdtiataa
*"080000000194wen
5 G e s
* -
1 iillo . il 1.1
rilas M mtenit.

S' l'
ggy
al
“E
Al
"teeeserseset pornorersoee •”••••♦
Sil
r
one c— —E
ee i :
d
a
—

9.901.099988000833161
08000080000900800000
i""it
ilat
s atma • s
0 090000.0029020888000 29000) 0000099
ly■ vl i - s28
Isa.
11!
WWWWWWWNS. s s
noes wesos voooworo) 822 2200082
■
IE
2,‛s F Ir
‘ ld
l, •
7545227.8 2012 = 500'
YEAR:

INQUIRY#:

U?
• 4
1 iii
il ::12122222 illl ill 20 E) Bl
I
ii II H I!
I . | W || |
Hiini : ill | H | II | i || ll | ’ !I llii 7
8 8
$7 Dir
1 II
’
e' 6 ta
■
* ,r.1 ES) 3,,
t 4,
I
1 B. 11
!

8.% 1
1 t ■
<0m I .MH >1 1
rt
I
$ es 6 • t rise 36
J • t
tod 2w . .7
1 ia
? ? tv ’
♦
"DrS ||!|!
2P"***em*
= a681"*r egaigla’dii il whef
$ 3 2
2 d:
i.“r
MHi hip
IJ
O
20 ♦
TN ittik
T8,
7 . e‘i
S
me •
I•at
m
t
r "T 5 gaenent eon
a?
ii’/•i
t
!
iti.

MkUP a | WJ ' 22) 5"ej"uy he5
Se- 5
hsede c
7545227.8 2009 = 500'
»
INQUIRY #:

YEAR: 1 N,8 (EDR
I
I A*' '
is
in ill II Hi ||
t
• —e
272
L "Te ‘ 55
- -
■ aww
e
UM
l
f
s
5 -As "I
J e
J 1
ni H 2298
y
iseat i 22
emmer
a
y 1 a
f
."•I
• ’ t “‘*r 1,‘ts -
—
♦ i setimmemman
1 • 4
hi - -
2• M
.1’ ■ a l ’ i ■ .240 MYXS
I
(I ee ’ 1ngagsc. Tae ga
V9V __ - T
f
I
MM
‘0
I r
Ui I
!
L
I ,w I ( e‘% Cr ) •r | W.lm •20 • ELC #**0 . . 7 • 3 INr1t iMramt/austod — - “d *
i
I I
t ‘
She
6 |
I
|
V
H
e .
■
1 k *< > h
s
‘g0*5"Y" —— C.
—f.
s
|
a;
1 I
h it. 1" |
IV e4N57 pl hir. ils
g
’.5
‘ • I
c wt 4
i
i
I
< sm ■ w
S1
7545227.8
2006
= 500'
L. A-si
17 SAI
P 1213i
5 t ■ i mi
Z, 89
€ DE
-.i 2
t 4|l. A sit
| |
#. 194 is
i I € •• “o 3:s whes h
I
wt
1 ! . ■
1 ,
wilO # J ke
Evo cah
5 -
I
lilliiin. 'P
J Hill
in Sss
in !!
ill
til
!
ill
t H
iil!:

III
I■ . 522
H.

T
*
4 I
2244.
h?
’ me
hi? illIfflld’iilllh
YWW. SI
-gisi E g.
it
i
sEE
ill
JI!
wh i r
liil
H ill
Ell
•a?
mill
-aiusy
i
Jod
y .D V Thal
Ilii
ili!! !
I
illisannuaii
f i:’:
।
IEWTH&"
i i
?!
B
’V
— g 9 —
r 21 • 2
a — TA
iilliiiHIii hfh
:!b
’
!!
-“i’Hii!-!
- ____ -
95 ■ill
1)
ijlml iiulH?;
illi|
i.
llAiai
tHr“'
. . 51 r- Fade 4
■iiuHf
* " r «
aa.
al
|
r ' »
it
i
i i
ii >HHH4
4 20229199
in
ill
ill Hl
i i -=rzsei
5421:—
III !RH
|
■!
|ii|
iil!
ii
YEAR:

INQUIRY#:
1 EDR
7545227.8 1998 = 500'
INQUIRY#:

YEAR: 1 N,8 (EDR
ua Cabosilam. aa ihe
..JI
idae 34
ts
“T
Mhng
rte
1 s
2 Wheel (%
s
> .“P /... t z.N --
2 i th
t
F l S,
£
: - A
St -ereaet
t
a ’I V
i 578so
%
e
t
].
i
7 A
1 wi
*
- toy •
ceteerme
)
»si it f thar
lli BPsvay 53 TEREa "NAIIUUNE
P
E
G
-HPs
..J
(
. wwie “estgig
"""ee*
-nee
w
p
-Ps)
t
!one •
I..

W
----- -_ -
al S09
- 2 Soossedtobaas
ioeuero MMf
r
3 - wen
ra
t le isel"
rtf sug Erra * 4
1 EWETW —‘Ar-y
2 5 ... ____ ke
1 A ’
rg
-
3 4
■ - 1
?
.' f Huressor T 4 co i
U.
nw.?
F 3", 6 " Eds
t -ruse. Hega m. - . coi ejghu
asten M’ss
7545227.8 1987 = 500'
INQUIRY#:

YEAR: 1 N,8 (EDR
Cmee ahasasaann
S
9‘or,.

I
4e
- S.
■
rireeneng wegT-Pw
I
ch
• 5e
g Euomgm=mq=q=mo==
I J 0
Yeu
the
t cl l
woeeace, inag ,) ..
asre 3 Ks
22243 E] I ■
f
I
R • ee
—
z)
7s" » re y ===== areet
—= esoead*Ateeecsoosggrsede Wd mrsmp.
' • Ee “ “ill."
}
it
n
ce
J. ‘32 !?
an
sets
mme
" 4
mlli jmur
sat
l
*£l
222490
a — Nm ' P..
#.‘I
Tmisk “ "=-====---99/90
woemggns oezandememeee
l
• rL
-
w
88 er ets
ware is
K.sf
).;
- HI
b
7545227.8 1984 = 500'
if
I
*
'll
- _i
* t
a
।
J
1h
re, _
. - i
iil
* I) J
It
—
s
»
.35
r
INQUIRY#:

YEAR: 1 N,8 (EDR
" e
t
L
2P7 1s & i
||
JI21
X 1 ’
■r
P
PF
nr w
■
r
. —— . -s. , .
--- Sh.Maei- -Mr- Ar apuungre«...

G
7545227.8 1979 = 500'
T .
ss
***n84
tk
S
Eammi 23512284 Srguris Trebveted 12.210.
t C - 35.34 ■ 1 "Wetandi fe WBMMMI ‘8
Dromn
S
t215’77;
2*9 - ee v
INQUIRY#:

YEAR: T N,8
.. in hnur iimm
it nemt —g • — ahos k 3 IauspaGmaANE — 1
tlaFiss, :
) - , Whelngli
m
saed ‘ . ily it. tSh ©a
(edR
Reagoc"mnees
i m . . i
"pM2t izimnr)
nen anm i s . i
l' ’ mmmmgasdm
zfasum i muns 4 ’ r
zg z2.vsmia:.

M
J
,9
w i
1 -ottad s —= "T"Ui 2.

W IN Ala - M
i
2s
iee i T4 ne
e
t
TT
$5 .
w ■
:F
I?
LA
|
re
iisa
•: w
?9 ■
ammgmc----------- -
Y
“rmtmesee =pnos> wocot.’ St 4 t - s -------
J
♦
' Amosoyess ee *».

Mrtomree= • "Puvevrod D.

I
I h. .g o -e.
assotcmm- —
geopreceenme e— ‘
m 20 ,5t9
■

2. a ) 2.
- r ' —
■ ■
_ i
1 P
Ma
wmnes.
' Ol i
ssusamers"
"i
. vo
T f
frer," I
22re .221 ss: 2.3 srere. .4
- n ’ Leri ,
it
aen
M
U-t
■*>
— ' a B al
ii
on —tlems
emons ■
■ :: “ r _ - . ।
l _ i
%
themtenr it
4 J
t , ■
CoNss - . -==--
-restleselests . erg juneat art ppeess=) -et —
Sor
".s •
*
: a
|)i
z L? i
z eltPrels areo*re -=e —=r=
" r i
t"
smemmmmmeemeememoogemogenecao
HH
mn, ***.TTMT yoseantem- ,
7545227.8 1973 = 500'
il
7 “nomsesssese.
2-ovs) —hmmmppimenjegeg I -sees so
—e*4:seeses cars... ““PP22V --s-==cvoc=5s2u222199capzapapmee I 2Z. : U .' '
#wmyene
tmbr
t.
norostess s
t anoomein
-= —=****=*=-- thrpenvs WFmc**r—d mrc”WArhehaa1 *****awersse-*. "hTEEEE “s *g =memeememomosmonepoao—ee,
tmeeecm——mmmt.pommmmd=icend . 5 ; -owcesl2)"2.2N2mmrepeenke/ve-)k" S2k, - 21522322prpmeea: - ‘$2s 15 ■ e * • e
meeig msamemmr : Tameme mmm -*s**ovs*n=**2==2112221229dee* - Roee
‘ J
i
s #t.
ter 127.
"iel
—
it
( --
ari -
3 «
»
' C
-
- ■— a
ua
cosgeee
le
• : ■■
--
ontsle. INQUIRY #:

YEAR: T N
(EDR
--- s " n
—
—
P
wT
8 -
P
I e ,
-n"
caneis
pppreuve. --33
sevei
2 ssemesrs**
llHTd
casy; eeyie fsrwrsTs. ii n--mu,-Eismaih t 1.3% s.
ht*sewi 3
Hl.s
eans 132%
2i ■ czprzkteniljb--e the s*e- ris
t: 7
22320
i.
13,
?6.
it
sihi
.31. ?:;•••
—
i
<
-
—
—Pme 4 ‘ ’
-l94m21.

I
(
-
I fl
-
"5
i "90 s * * as *« 32 * S275 ‘ -Hmmamnaammam
l.
t
2422120.
ffscc*8m
di2ii2
M

1. m
423223 y in2 s
iir F
d , t. teereer a - satas, ammrnmmnegjulini
mmmmmmamggge
•"laompaai attstH" • "3.. " .“I 3 "221*34 sdeo*s X7232 "Y uemin 4 .
“=
mi
0B99
* ' L
" asavst 426,,
"djmmh -—aaialm—bamm: -2
-
13s;
il
, e -19.
sag .. l
°tu3
izism
; 0!l ilia
222925662222215/3 iari ‘ s
wos
‘e/ "2
29 ii
a
: 2 “*n**rreosed
ii 1
2":
resenes ii
aseerec
t :t2a 6 nvesas
■i!
1 i;
-=essi2tass2 idiniin 111
! 2
i:5
Agconds ill
H
ig
-1 eh
ttewdeoelres
mee
Hill
a
iif
at
2*55 755605¥s 207423377 ‘“*=*erA.rlamr.*o*sc.
sisiikte
-iii
ss222ustpppte325 oes -hega229232% llllmdiii,
-z3222s225s20-;:2: ::
suit
‘e
**
(
k as
•)
"I “
tas; tetmme I
umiu I
s
ii
7545227.8 1967 = 500'
- I S52 TAT VENUEVPUT
M Mhcssmtsrsimse temen II
i h 27
1 ■ st
L
*
t 2 2:
4 2223288, psenees fl,
l00nbsee reesobe J 332.
end
090504 s
6 ' 51.a i 42
I
I
. a 3
-j r- J - dF
"V.
r i
<0m
2 | *
s
I TT
3 1 "
T
3 s
y - ft
Q s
Q
J L 4546: . L LU y P 11
9 Y
, unas
■ HM . waie
j
= *0**8888586s
6 1
iiii ;;
imie
2222222225
8 ed
O
C
28252 $12233
s
C ■ 3
egs
i
...7
19"Was
-nt 33. “9h osero
3 T
• ri ■
i
■F
7545227.8 1962 = 500'
INQUIRY#:

YEAR: 1 N,8 (EDR
‘t. .2.. Pt t!-li222 20 -2-760621.,
1 t
t
t Iil,
■
eT" J r
a
seoeies*
St.rg500
t 21112 ::: I
e
t 3 ---tl.at
1 i [ne t -r*ssis+
7 il\ri J hit 1 t. & 3
is*rttss
4 t* 2.
4 3
1 ?*rr. 2*1**4
! I. :1 211 20 F.
3 T Bi it *** 22 2 se ;»• 2 ..
i

25.2137.11.
211.-11’4. 75,
1 % •fS-;
n
I 1
-ciie=oi= 2 sie * ******/44 225520111 —E
‘ "E seceee t — 21221/
iili! i.;:
::: $1 eijtersae El willesr, M
"TUPIPW/Tly ’ l a | g
EVAWAUf MMHUI "Wi
is
s.

J J
t at
T
<
% eafe ------- L -M2Srt
"aiaaih - 4of, 1.
j$
1 I
»
it
LI
i; ‘s 1 'IM83 * 11
I
ill
$ i
A
| “II i
I s _ s <
""""""""""""" "IIIF”—♦' | Sediniiiiili" prr.-------------- . - - _________ PMMP***eE ! —eesscad =
um- ate
$
i
tt
. I
T
!0r4
1122.1:

I
si%1 ttif
te5.
i0
1211
illal
pt-2.
*
tasfe t”3
re
M
t"
h
iliI i if in
1 3.
- "AMMMMMMMMMN/a.=B«SK 1 •_? ' ----------------- ..... **** .. Maii 177 irait i
152211:,
M i53e
: M
iff
WSB
9* - , .
% hi
rIa4g
"g ' "Asp
|mes fi
-
r- » 310 •.
he
Fir
7545227.8 1957 = 500'
m
re
ii l
.si ) ei
■
ert * well
f‘7 -
/
(
( ■
■
une*t? J
i w I 3
2 h. J —
J e
( $
felr i
!
V
4Wu= l
. ii
7 a
/
• sl Ml
1 4 / 1 '
$ jiNI.
7 Ps
(
A,
V ? 9
d
s
22— —
r
5212333
t
ill ■■ aee 333. , p-mmme 2:3: t • V col," Aa “Ser
(VII lll/ll
RY#:
: 1N c
5 EDR t
-1 ■
I
i
A E
iingi shia
w
*
“4
■
■ ts
4 ()
—a — E.
4 b I
“f,ona
>
■
E
* J I
s f
s r
7545227.8 1950 = 500'
so ■
J
4 555 Jus
a2T‘te
—*i
INQUIRY#:

YEAR: T N,8 (EDR
li ft |
$3
J - II ill'!-! wrele
,3
t
2 A xi** it l
I 144855
A
—.2 Ait l >1 MWi
I
£
- V. |IIII ■■■■ PPre’e
A
i 5 r T.lilhahv
3 r I
it 11 !
t (y . )
op T
1 7
.t ! » FJ
$ flip■NT'"'
1 ft
",
r
PSTregferren l tha-*s=*ni twt l ■ • • • OKtorani TF ‘ -*3** UIE7 I
I
. D "
y
V- 3
j
*
—t me SapH 7 .
(i
f
|
9 ‘
-ulll
7B | 213
teus
||||
st
rd
; T" L »
g
7545227.8 1946 = 500'
•r?’<
A
we
h
d.-9
ord
4 n'g-iyrostime Pesos,
I
B k S4 :
will “
-s “ $ # J
$
i
‘s — " T 542est
-4.- wigtloe)
,*,= lommooyu
,8a
toe otsen o- wa wertoct 3 J st e
f. r *****

2.nnor €
S67t
, em-m *95 • • e
8 ah-9egrep Ne22
.1C
a.

S:
• ms* • MMPerdn-den o
wws • o% eer o sonemte.
isGsmosran,.
8jr
.9 *”Dn9*e mps fruid-gn*)
::: • Caserpis 1eBdn-nrechse
« s22m
*,--2
.3.
.i .
r9
0 4 « t.
♦ d. = 9
tw 7.
allll
f 1:
::1%
$‘7
“*4" 9*
Geo es oeht
• @nm d *22-90
vOombbedeems oMme
- Aho; . _ : 2 1
snpomauentommpsaimmo"=n="
Geserare so.w • weprenammn osa _ annwenanien:asy pa emgron-n .. 9 TpMre P a. epsor* -o ,.'
"4: phstermenisins
# se ♦ 6
|
sehopraty“a
::•>
288"

1.4 4 4.,.
• Ui.'.’ w
= Les
2:tt j -te
"W*
•J ‘s
SHif
isil 11331 tw
■ • ?VAdi -aopsesseant,,,,
5 I
ami
02%
%
, seri"
358" ■ : - os ista rs -ttllie
-
... #
3 thparieeca t _ 4
h
#0.099*38~©de-99e.
"es
ee
es $
al
-ad A
2242200004*84. ■ •» -.,5.6
—s. ---
■.__ _ i EFSPAEE
st .3
r
I
53 251*" .
0 he
As PRP5
f
2 I
S
P i 45 .
hi
4 A
f
= 3?
Y. 1
e m 0
1 INQUIRY #:

YEAR: 1 N
(EDR
ilk
‘h
bekrenga-s ** ... Hi |
t
"os"s=EES7FKSMEEEE=EBEE=omne=a==E
toemt==-- —--9-=-=== )
a :
14 Blit
ne
ve
4,
illit
r
aespe hesthe
--5
|
% “1
ijl lli
i
-
Upi ■ iha
7545227.8
37 = 500'
y II
I/IH&
a
i mum
V: I , II, "Bpa
■ Hi
l l i ‘g mil 'lian
Ii Hlllllllllliln 'ill il $$%
wl
f ti
y
?
s "hr
2 f s “ioy. ‘09
■ nil s. p Cona •Il .‘82 WM,
j
J
illilllli ‘s mill ■'I ..2 al
s
0 it.
i 3
5 TE a.
*
I.^1
255 itI 3
L
s hurs’
2 .1 d
■
"""lll I, 5 fist 3,
e i 153 1 Dra 02; 3
■ s [ f. P/ t4
|
S. Ullllih
I,
h ml
/
I ll r
7 “An, I,
)
?
<in j i«
2 m
'lih Il
: ‘"ili
I
iUiBi 'll
Illi
mail >. J)
». I.
»o
l
t
■Il esi J , llll'i 9 • 4 Sor KlBlf-l. Tu P ”og. III , D t 11 it I B Jl l/Klii<'I * 3$ *
?
‘4
I
?
2 G
s
f s37.

1. 'll
Ma fl!
hi .eer.
oas
, • -.2 e,t 2
17 mPte . Killian
M
—
a
i
i
Hill
l
Killll mM-EP PW.
ref
mlB
!
:!i! IL
iWlfili
me
h.
1 i i i ll', 'lllS
ml
I :

I l l illll
ar
l’hi
itlTTTIpMTIMTIMI
2 ipW.
w®
11M■a
?
-t
. d
12, id
w
ii
es
1Y -er.
022
hsit
■
3cn
u
■■K
-saI
mmdlllllm
■g ■
WBi
e
rt
-= s J ei
i 41' 2)ePj
a
sa ROH
Ill
a all
UP-.)
llio“5m
9322 . EEY,
123332222 ti
tiiiii
'•ilia
11 '[i I illi!
8 1 ' i'lllllll'lillilill m.‘''mil 47
ilj 1 ■ ll'!■■11IH
rill ’ i limn
II'I/IIIIIII aiin
hl i
7 -fe-III:'
Appendix B
Preliminary Report Top Sheet
♦ HELP US STAY ON TOP OF YOUR TRANSACTION ♦
Have any of the principals recently filed bankruptcy?♦
Do any of the principals plan to use a power of attorney?♦ ♦ Are any of the principals going through a divorce? (if so, is there an attorney involved?) ♦
Do any of the principals NOT have a valid photo identification?♦ ♦ Is there construction work in progress or incomplete construction? o
o
Is there a mobile or manufactured home on the property?♦ ♦ Are the sellers a non-resident alien or a foreign out of country seller? ♦ Is the property an investment property or not considered seller’s principal residence? Will a new entity be formed? (i.e. Partnership, LLC, Corporation)♦ ♦
♦ Will any of the principals be participating in a 1031 Exchange? ♦

THANK YOU FOR CHOOSING
Placer Title Company
IF ANY OF THESE QUESTIONS ARE ANSWERED “YES”, OR IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS

ABOUT THE BELOW, PLEASE CONTACT YOUR ESCROW OFFICER IMMEDIATELY Any construction completed in the last year?
Any construction completed in the last 4 months?
If your principals are currently vested or are taking title in their trust, have bank accounts been established in the name of the Trust?
Are any of the principals not able to sign with a Placer Title Company? If so, an approved notary will be required.

Is anyone currently vested in title deceased? Has a new Tax I.D. Number been established?

A MOTHER LODE COMPANY
Escrow Number: P-615842

WIRE FRAUD ADVISORY
In addition, the following self-protection strategies are recommended to minimize exposure to possible wire fraud.

DO NOT RELY on emails purporting to change wire instructions. Placer Title Company will never change its wire instructions in the course of a transaction. If you receive a random or unsolicited email from anyone This Notice is not intended to provide legal or professional advice, nor is it an exclusive list of self-protection strategies.

Customers are encouraged to always be aware of such schemes, and to contact their escrow officer if ever in doubt.

PLCS

PLACER TITLE COMPANY
Parties to a real estate transaction are often targets for wire fraud and financial confidence schemes, unfortunately with many losing tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars because they relied (without verification) on “revised” or “new” wire instructions appearing to come from a trusted party to the transaction.

VERIFY the wire instructions you do receive by calling the party who sent the instructions to you. However, DO NOT use the phone number provided in the email containing the instructions, and DO NOT send a reply email to verify, since the email address may be incorrect, fraudulent or being intercepted by the fraudster. Rather, use phone numbers you have called before and/or can independently verify through other sources (company website or internet search).

IF YOU INTEND TO WIRE FUNDS IN CONJUNCTION WITH THIS REAL ESTATE TRANSACTION, WE

STRONGLY RECOMMEND THAT YOU VERBALLY VERIFY THOSE INSTRUCTIONS THROUGH A KNOWN, TRUSTED PHONE NUMBER PRIOR TO SENDING FUNDS.

USE COMPLEX PASSWORDS that are at least ten (10) characters long and contain a combination of mixed case, numbers, and symbols. You should also change your password often and not reuse the same password for other online accounts.
requesting funds to be wired, and attaching “new,” “alternate,” “updated,” “revised” and/or “different” wire instructions, contact your escrow officer immediately (at a verifiable number in the manner noted below) and before wiring any money.

ENABLE MULTI-FACTOR AUTHENTICATION for all email accounts. Your email provider may have specific instructions on how to implement this feature.

CHECK FOR AUTO-FORWARDING on your email account and disable it. This is one of the most “silent” ways a fraudster can monitor your email account because every email that comes in is automatically forwarded to them, even if you change your password.

P-615842
Proposed Underwriter: First American Title Insurance Company Property Address: 7298 East McKinley Avenue, Fresno, CA 93737

PRELIMINARY REPORT
Proposed Insured:

Proposed Loan Amount:

Dated:

Title Officer:

December 26, 2023 at 7:30AM
Val Lasky
This report (and any supplements or amendments hereto) is issued solely for the purpose of facilitating the issuance of a policy of title insurance and no liability is assumed hereby. If it is desired that liability be assumed priorto the issuance of a policy of title insurance, a Binder or Commitment should be requested.

Please read the exceptions shown or referred to below and the exceptions and exclusions set forth in Attachment One of this report carefully. The exceptions and exclusions are meant to provide you with notice of matters which are not covered under the terms of the title insurance policy and should be carefully considered.

It is important to note that this preliminary report is not a written representation as to the condition of title and may not list all liens, defects, and encumbrances affecting title to the land.

In response to the above referenced application for a policy of title insurance, Placer Title Company hereby reports that it is prepared to issue, or cause to be issued, as of the date hereof, a Policy or Policies of Title Insurance describing the land and the estate or interest therein hereinafter set forth, insuring against loss which may be sustained by reason of any defect, lien or encumbrance not shown or referred to as an Exception below or not excluded from coverage pursuant to the printed Schedules, Conditions and Stipulations of said Policy forms.

The printed Exceptions and Exclusions from the coverage and Limitations on Covered Risks of said Policy or Policies are set forth in Attachment One. The policy to be issued may contain an arbitration clause. When the Amount of Insurance is less than that set forth in the arbitration clause, all arbitrable matters shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. Limitations on Covered Risks applicable to the CLTA and ALTA Homeowner's Policies of Title Insurance which establish a Deductible Amount and a Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability for certain coverages are also set forth in Attachment One. Copies of the policy forms should be read. They are available from the office which issued this report.

CLTA Preliminary Report

Page 1 of 22 ends

Order No.:

Reference:

Escrow Officer:

Email:

Email Loan Docs To:

Darryl Evans
[email protected]
[email protected]
Placer Title Company
7700 N. Palm, Suite 101
Fresno, CA 93711
Phone: (559)261-2910 PLd
Fax: (559)261-2963 PLACER TITLE COMPANY

A MOTHER LODE COMPANY
Order Number: P-615842
The form of policy of title insurance contemplated by this report is:
2021 ALTA Standard Owners Policy
2021 ALTA Extended Loan Policy
The estate or interest in the land hereinafter described or referred to covered by this report is:

Fee Simple
Title to said estate or interest at the date hereof is vested in:

The land referred to in this report is described as follows:

See Exhibit "A" Attached for Legal Description
CLTA Preliminary Report

Page 2 of 22 ends

Vincent G. Zaninovich, Jr. and Mary Therese Zaninovich. Trustees of the Vincent George Zaninovich, Jr. and Mary Therese Zaninovich Joint Living Trust; Gwyn L. Krstich, Trustee of Trust A under the Jeffrey J.

Krstich and Gwyn L. Krstich Inter Vivos Trust dated, April 8, 2002; Karen Leigh Storey; Carol C. Koszyk; Sheryl Michaels, also known of record as Sheryl Michael; Gail Hair; Jillian Prigmore Harrell; Matthew Prigmore; Sarah Koszyk King; Brett Barletta; Paige Barletta; and Susan C. Barletta, a widow, all as their interest(s) may appear of record
Order Number: P-615842
APN: 310-052-27
Lots 20 and 21 of the Subdivision of Section 26, Township 13 South, Range 21 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, according to the Official Records on file in the Office of the County Recorder of said County.

Excepting therefrom that portion of said Lot 21 as deeded to Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District in Deed recorded February 16, 1990, as Document No. 90018737, Official Records, described as follows:

CLTA Preliminary Report

Page 3 of 22 ends

The land described herein is situated in the State of California, County of Fresno, unincorporated area, described as follows:

Beginning at the point of intersection of the East line of said Lot 21 with a line which is parallel with and 351.00 feet North of, measured at right angles thereto, the South line of said Section 26, which point bears North 0° 01' 01" East a distance of 350.01 feet from the Southeast corner of the Southwest quarter of said Section 26; thence North 89° 35' 29" West along said parallel line a distance of 661.76 feet to the point of intersection of said parallel line with the West line of the East half of said Lot 21; thence North 0° 00' 35" East along the West line of the East half of said Lot 21 a distance of 886.94 feet; thence North 29° 27' 42" West a distance of 63.68 feet; thence North 71° 25' 25" West a distance of 64.28 feet; thence South 89° 26' 58" West a distance of 306.91 feet; thence South 57° 15' 00" West a distance of 216.62 feet; thence North 35° 49' 38" West a distance of 20 feet; thence South 79° 18' 49" West a distance of 72.66 feet to a point on the West line of said Lot 20; thence North 0° 00' 10" East along the West line of said Lot 20, a distance of 141.69 feet to the Northwest corner of said Lot 20; thence South 89° 38' 57" East along the North line of said Lots 20 and 21 a distance of 1323.77 feet; thence South 0° 01' 01" West along the East line of said Lot 21 a distance of 973.97 feet to the point of beginning.

Exhibit "A"
Legal Description
Order Number: P-615842

EXCEPTIONS

1. Taxes, special and general, assessment districts and service areas for the Fiscal Year 2023-2024:

2. 3.

Any taxes or assessments levied by:4.

5. Affects: As described therein.

6. Affects: As described therein.

Note: First Installment is due November 1 and delinquent December 10. Second Installment is due February 1 and delinquent April 10.

Paid
Due
At the date hereof, exceptions to coverage in addition to the printed Exceptions and Exclusions in said policy form would be as follows:

An easement over said land for road, canal and incidental purposes, as reserved by Christian Voigt, in deed recorded January 1, 1883, (book) 29 (page) 555, of Deeds.

The lien of supplemental taxes, if any, assessed pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 3.5, (commencing with Section 75) of the Revenue and Taxation Code, of the State of California.

A. Fresno Irrigation District
B. Sierra Resource Conservation District
An easement over said land for road and incidental purposes, as reserved by Sophir Eggers, et al, in deed recorded June 23, 1903, (book) 306 (page) 265, Official Records.

Said land lies within the boundaries of the Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District and is subject to the potential payment of drainage fees and/or the requirement of construction of drainage facilities as a condition of development, reconstruction, additions or alterations associated with said land.

If the parties involved in this transaction desire further information as to the effect this resolution may have on said land, they may contact Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District at (559) 456-3292.

No representation is made as to the current ownership of said easement.

Document Link
CLTA Preliminary Report

Page 4 of 22 ends

1st Installment:
2nd Installment:

Parcel Number:

Code Area:

Land Value:

Imp. Value:

Total Value:

Exemption Amount:
$4,582.60
$4,582.60
310-052-27
076-052
$473,903.00
$171,932.00
$645,835.00
$0.00

7. 8. Riparian or water rights, claims, or title to water whether or not shown by the Public Records.

9. 10.

11. 12.

According to the public records, no deeds conveying the property described in this report have been recorded within a period of 2 years prior to the date of this report, except as shown herein: NONE 7298 E. McKinley Avenue, Fresno, CA 93727
Terms, provisions and conditions of those certain trust agreements referred to in the vesting herein. We will require that a completed, signed and notarized trust certification pursuant to Section 18100.5 of the Probate Code be submitted prior to closing. If trustee is deceased, incompetent or has resigned, both a trust certification, signed by successor trustee and copies of the entire trust including any amendments must be submitted for review prior to closing.

Any maps provided herewith are for reference only. The property and/or easements shown are but approximations, and no assurances are given as to accuracy, reliability, dimensions or acreage. This will not limit the coverage provided by a CLTA 116, 116.1 or 116.03 endorsement if issued to the policy.

No representation is made as to the current ownership of said easement.

Document Link
Reference is made to said document for full particulars.

Document Link
Rights and easements, including but not limited to, recreation, navigation and fishery, which may exist over that portion of said land lying beneath the waters of Redbank Creek and Mill Ditch.

Rights of the public and of the County of Fresno, as to that portion of the herein described property lying within East McKinley Avenue, a public road.

Placer Title Company states that the herein described property is a Single Family Residence and that the property address is:

CLTA Preliminary Report

Page 5 of 22 ends

The terms, conditions, provisions and stipulations as contained in the agreement entitled "Memorandum of Agreement of Purchase and Sale of Real Property (And Joint Escrow Instructions)", by and between Tri-Wilson, LP, a California Limited Partnership , and Susan C. Barletta, et al, recorded May 22, 2018, (instrument) 2018- 0060706, Official Records.

The above numbered report is hereby modified and/or supplemented to reflect the following additional items relating to the issuance of an American Land Title Association Loan Form Policy:

The requirement that Placer Title Company be provided with a Free and Clear Affidavit-Verification of Unencumbered Property executed by the vestee(s) herein. ***NOTICE REGARDING MAPS
*** CHAIN OF TITLE REPORT:
************************* SPECIAL INFORMATION ************************* *** LENDER'S SUPPLEMENTAL ADDRESS REPORT:

IMPORTANT NOTICE- ACCEPTABLE TYPE OF FUNDS

PLEASE CONTACT ESCROW REGARDING QUESTIONS ON TYPE OF FUNDS REQUIRED IN ORDER TO FACILITATE THE PROMPT CLOSING OF THIS TRANSACTION.

Please be advised that in accordance with the provisions of the California Insurance Code, Section 12413.1, any funds deposited for the closing must be deposited into the escrow depository and cleared prior to disbursement. Funds deposited by wire transfer may be disbursed upon receipt. Funds deposit via cashier's checks drawn on a California based bank may be disbursed the next business day. If funds are deposited with the Company by other methods, recording and/or disbursement may be delayed.

IMPORTANT NOTE: PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT ESCROW HOLDER DOES NOT ACCEPT CASH, MONEY ORDERS, ACH TRANSFERS, OR FOREIGN CHECKS.

CLTA Preliminary Report

Page 6 of 22 ends

NOTE: If you intend to remit multiple cashier's checks to close your escrow (which may or may not include gift funds or third party funds) IRS cash reporting under IRS Code 8300 may be required. For this reason, you may wish to consider wiring funds in lieu of remitting cashier's checks. *** NOTICE REGARDING FUNDS DEPOSITED IN ESCROW:

DISCLOSURE OF DISCOUNTS *** ***

1. 2.

3. Please advise the company if you believe any of the above discounts apply.

LENDER'S NOTE *** ***
BUYER'S NOTE *** ***

1. 2.

3. 4.

5. You may be entitled to a discount on your title premiums and/or escrow fees if you meet any of the following conditions:

If an ALTA Residential Owner's Policy is requested and if the property described herein is determined to be eligible for this policy, the following Exceptions From Coverage will appear in the policy:

In accordance with Executive Order 13224, and the USA Patriot Act, PLACER TITLE COMPANY compares the names of parties to the proposed transaction to the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons (SDN List) maintained by the United States Office of Foreign Asset Control.

Any rights, interest or claims of parties in possession of the land which are not shown by the public records.

Any facts about the land which a correct survey would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. This exception does not limit the forced removal coverage in Item 12 of the Covered Title Risks.

Taxes or assessments which are not shown as liens by the public records or by the records of any taxing authority.

Any easements or liens not shown by the public records. This exception does not limit the lien coverage in Item 8 of the Covered Title Risks.

CLTA Preliminary Report

Page 7 of 22 ends

You are an employee of the title insurer or Placer Title Company and the property is your primary residence; or
The transaction is a loan, the purpose of which is to rebuild the improvements on the property as a result of a governmentally declared disaster; or
The property is being purchased or encumbered by a religious, charitable or nonprofit organization for its use within the normal activities for which such entity was intended. (a) Water rights, claims or title to water; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) unpatented mining claims; whether or not the matters exception under (a), (b) or (c) are shown by the public records.

CLTA Preliminary Report

Page 8 of 22 ends

1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records.

Proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records.

2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or which may be asserted by persons in possession thereof.

3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the public records.

The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of:

This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which arise by reason of:

CLTA PRELIMINARY REPORT FORM
Attachment One (Rev 11-09-18)
CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION STANDARD COVERAGE POLICY -1990

EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE

1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building or zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien, or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy.

2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge.

3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters:
(a) whether or not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant;
(b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy;
(c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage or for the estate or interest insured by this policy.

4. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with the applicable doing business laws of the state in which the land is situated.

5. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage, or claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth in lending law.

6. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction vesting in the insured the estate of interest insured by this policy or the transaction creating the interest of the insured lender, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency or similar creditors' rights laws.

EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE - SCHEDULE B, PART 1

EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE

EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE

2. 3.
a.
b.

Some historical land records contain Discriminatory Covenants that are illegal and unenforceable by law. This policy treats any Discriminatory Covenant in a document referenced in Schedule B as if each Discriminatory Covenant is redacted, repudiated, removed, and not republished or recirculated. Only the remaining provisions of the document are excepted from coverage.

1. a. any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) that restricts, regulates, prohibits, or relates to:
i. the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; ii. the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement on the Land; iii. the subdivision of land; or iv. environmental remediation or protection. b. any governmental forfeiture, police, regulatory, or national security power. c. the effect of a violation or enforcement of any matter excluded under Exclusion l.a. or l.b. Exclusion 1 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5 or 6.

Any power of eminent domain. Exclusion 2 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7.

Any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim, or other matter:
created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at the Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured CLTA Preliminary Report

Page 9 of 22 ends

Claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy;
c. resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant; d. attaching or created subsequent to the Date of Policy (Exclusion 3.d. does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 9 or 10); or
e. resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if consideration sufficient to qualify the Insured named in Schedule A as a bona fide purchaser had been given for the Title at the Date of Policy.

4. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights law, that the transaction vesting the Title as shown in Schedule A is a:
a. fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer;
b. voidable transfer under the Uniform Voidable Transactions Act; or c. preferential transfer:
i. to the extent the instrument of transfer vesting the Title as shown in Schedule A is not a transfer made as a contemporaneous exchange for new value; or ii. for any other reason not stated in Covered Risk 9.b.

5. Any claim of a PACA-PSA Trust. Exclusion 5 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 8.

6. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed or collected by a governmental authority that becomes due and payable after the Date of Policy. Exclusion 6 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 2.b.

7. Any discrepancy in the quantity of the area, square footage, or acreage of the Land or of any improvement to the Land.

4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by the public records.

5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b) or (c) are shown by the public records.

6. Any lien or right to a lien for services, labor or material unless such lien is shown by the public records at Date of Policy.

The following matters are excluded from the coverage of this policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees, or expenses that arise by reason of:

CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION
STANDARD COVERAGE OWNER’S POLICY (02-04-22)
PARTI
(Variable exceptions such as taxes, easements, CC&R's, etc., are inserted here) CLTA/ALTA HOMEOWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE (07-01-2021)

EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE
CLTA Preliminary Report

Page 10 of 22 ends

1. a. any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) that restricts, regulates, prohibits, or relates to: i. the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; ii. the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement on the Land; iii. the subdivision of land; or iv. environmental remediation or protection.
b. any governmental forfeiture, police, or regulatory, or national security power. c. the effect of a violation or enforcement of any matter excluded under Exclusion l.a. or l.b.

Exclusion 1 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 8.a., 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 23, or 27.

2. Any power to take the Land by condemnation. Exclusion 2 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 17.

3. Any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim, or other matter:
a. created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by You;
b. not Known to Us, not recorded in the Public Records at the Date of Policy, but Known to You and not disclosed in writing to Us by You prior to the date You became an Insured under this policy; c. resulting in no loss or damage to You;
d. attaching or created subsequent to the Date of Policy (Exclusion 3.d. does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5, 8.f., 25, 26, 27, 28, or 32); or
This policy does not insure against loss or damage and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees, or expenses resulting from the terms and conditions of any lease or easement identified in Schedule A, and the following matters:

The following matters are excluded from the coverage of this policy and We will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys1 fees, or expenses that arise by reason of:

1. (a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; (b) proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records.

2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims that are not shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy but that could be (a) ascertained by an inspection of the Land, or (b) asserted by persons or parties in possession of the Land.

3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy.

4. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, easement, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy.

6. Any lien or right to a lien for services, labor, material or equipment unless such lien is shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy.

7. Any claim to (a) ownership of or rights to minerals and similar substances, including but not limited to ores, metals, coal, lignite, oil, gas, uranium, clay, rock, sand, and gravel located in, on, or under the Land or produced from the Land, whether such ownership or rights arise by lease, grant, exception, conveyance, reservation, or otherwise; and (b) any rights, privileges, immunities, rights of way, and easements associated therewith or appurtenant thereto, whether or not the interests or rights excepted in (a) or (b) appear in the Public Records or are shown in Schedule B.

PART II
other subsurface substance.

9. Any lien on Your Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed or collected by a governmental authority that Any discrepancy in the quantity of the area, square footage, or acreage of the Land or of any improvement to the

LIMITATIONS ON COVERED RISKS
Your insurance for the following Covered Risks is limited on the Owner's Coverage Statement as follows:

The deductible amounts and maximum dollar limits shown on Schedule A are as follows:

Your Deductible Amount
Covered Risk 16: $10,000.00
Covered Risk 18: $25,000.00
Covered Risk 19: $25,000.00
Covered Risk 21: $5,000.00
CLTA/ALTA HOMEOWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE (12-02-13)

EXCLUSIONS

7. 8.

10. Land.

Our Maximum Dollar
Limit of Liability
becomes due and payable after the Date of Policy. Exclusion 9 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 8.a. or 27.

Contamination, explosion, fire, flooding, vibration, fracturing, earthquake, or subsidence.

Negligence by a person or an entity exercising a right to extract or develop oil, gas, minerals, groundwater, or any In addition to the Exceptions in Schedule B, You are not insured against loss, costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses resulting from:

For Covered Risk 16, 18, 19, and 21 Your Deductible Amount and Our Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability shown in Schedule A.

CLTA Preliminary Report

Page 11 of 22 ends

e. resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if You paid consideration sufficient to qualify You as a bona fide purchaser of the Title at the Date of Policy.

4. Lack of a right:
a. to any land outside the area specifically described and referred to in Item 3 of Schedule A; and b. in any street, road, avenue, alley, lane, right-of-way, body of water, or waterway that abut the Land.

Exclusion 4 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 11 or 21.

5. The failure of Your existing structures, or any portion of Your existing structures, to have been constructed before, on, or after the Date of Policy in accordance with applicable building codes. Exclusion 5 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 14 or 15.

6. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights law, that the transfer of the Title to You is a:
a. fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer;
b. voidable transfer under the Uniform Voidable Transactions Act; or c. preferential transfer: i. to the extent the instrument of transfer vesting the Title as shown in Schedule A is not a transfer made as a contemporaneous exchange for new value; or ii. for any other reason not stated in Covered Risk 30. 1% of Policy Amount or $2,500.00
(whichever is less)
1% of Policy Amount or $5,000.00
(whichever is less)
1% of Policy Amount or $5,000.00
(whichever is less)
1% of Policy Amount or $2,500.00
(whichever is less)
Your insurance for the following Covered Risks is limited on the Owner's Coverage Statement as follows:

The deductible amounts and maximum dollar limits shown on Schedule A are as follows:

Your Deductible Amount
Covered Risk 16: $10,000.00
Covered Risk 18: $25,000.00
Covered Risk 19: $25,000.00
Covered Risk 21: $5,000.00

1. Governmental police power, and the existence or violation of those portions of any law or government regulation concerning:

Our Maximum Dollar
Limit of Liability

28. 5.

6. a. 1
b.

CLTA Preliminary Report

Page 12 of 22 ends

For Covered Risk 16, 18, 19, and 21 Your Deductible Amount and Our Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability shown in Schedule A.

Failure to pay value for Your Title.

Lack of a right:
to any land outside the area specifically described and referred to in paragraph 3 of Schedule A; and in streets, alleys, or waterways that touch the Land.
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.

This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 8.a., 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 23 or 27.

2. The failure of Your existing structures, or any part of them, to be constructed in accordance with applicable building codes. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 14 or 15.

3. The right to take the Land by condemning it. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 17.

4. Risks:
a. that are created, allowed, or agreed to by You, whether or not they are recorded in the Public Records; b. that are Known to You at the Policy Date, but not to Us, unless they are recorded in the Public Records at the Policy Date;
c. that result in no loss to You; or
d. that first occur after the Policy Date - this does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 7, 8.e., 25, 26, 27 or building;
zoning;
land use;
improvements on the Land;
land division; and
environmental protection.
1% of Policy Amount or $2,500.00
(whichever is less)
1% of Policy Amount or $5,000.00
(whichever is less)
1% of Policy Amount or $5,000.00
(whichever is less)
1% of Policy Amount or $2,500.00
(whichever is less)
This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 11 or 21.

7. The transfer of the Title to You is invalid as a preferential transfer or as a fraudulent transfer or conveyance under federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws.

8. Contamination, explosion, fire, flooding, vibration, fracturing, earthquake, or subsidence.

9. Negligence by a person or an Entity exercising a right to extract or develop minerals, water, or any other substances.

LIMITATIONS ON COVERED RISKS
ALTA OWNER'S POLICY (07-01-2021)

EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE

EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE
This policy does not insure against loss or damage and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees, or expenses resulting from the terms and conditions of any lease or easement identified in Schedule A, and the following matters:

NOTE: The 2021 ALTA Owner's Policy may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to variable exceptions such as taxes, easements, CC&R's, etc., the Exceptions from Coverage in a Standard Coverage policy will also include the Western Regional Standard Coverage Exceptions listed as 1 through 7 below:

2. 3.
a.
b.

The following matters are excluded from the coverage of this policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees, or expenses that arise by reason of:

Any power of eminent domain. Exclusion 2 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7.

Page 13 of 22 ends

4. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights law, that the transaction vesting the Title as shown in Schedule A is a:
a. fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer;
b. voidable transfer under the Uniform Voidable Transactions Act; or c. preferential transfer: i. to the extent the instrument of transfer vesting the Title as shown in Schedule A is not a transfer made as a contemporaneous exchange for new value; or ii. for any other reason not stated in Covered Risk 9.b.

5. Any claim of a PACA-PSA Trust. Exclusion 5 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 8.

7. Any discrepancy in the quantity of the area, square footage, or acreage of the Land or of any improvement to the Land.

1. a. any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) that restricts, regulates, prohibits, or relates to: i. the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; ii. the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement on the Land; iii. the subdivision of land; or iv. environmental remediation or protection.
b. any governmental forfeiture, police, regulatory, or national security power. c. the effect of a violation or enforcement of any matter excluded under Exclusion l.a. or l.b.

Exclusion 1 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5 or 6. 2006 ALTA OWNER'S POLICY (06-17-06)

EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE
The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees, or expenses that arise by reason of:

CLTA Preliminary Report

Page 14 of 22 ends

assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records.

2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims that are not shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy but that could be (a) ascertained by an inspection of the Land or (b) asserted by persons or parties in possession of the Land.

3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy.

6. Any lien or right to a lien for services, labor, material or equipment unless such lien is shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy.

1. (a) Any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting, or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; (ii) the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement erected on the Land; (iii) the subdivision of land; or (iv) environmental protection; or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances, or governmental regulations. This Exclusion 1(a) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5. (b) Any governmental police power. This Exclusion 1(b) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 6.

2. Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or

8. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters (a) created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; (b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy;
(c) resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (however, this does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 9 and 10); or
(e) resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Title.

4. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that the transaction vesting the Title as shown in Schedule A, is (a) a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or
(b) a preferential transfer for any reason not stated in Covered Risk 9 of this policy.

5. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by governmental authority and created or attaching between Date of Policy and the date of recording of the deed or other instrument of transfer in the Public Records that vests Title as shown in Schedule A.

EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE
CLTA Preliminary Report

Page 15 of 22 ends

This policy does not insure against loss or damage, and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses, that arise by reason of:

NOTE: The 2006 ALTA Owner's Policy may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to variable exceptions such as taxes, easements, CC&R's, etc., the Exceptions from Coverage in a Standard Coverage policy will also include the Western Regional Standard Coverage Exceptions listed below as 1 through 7 below:

3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy.

6. Any lien or right to a lien for services, labor, material or equipment unless such lien is shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy.

CALIFORNIA WITHHOLDING

1. 2.
a. within the meaning of
b.
e.
f.
gThe Seller is subject to penalty for knowingly filing a fraudulent certificate for the purpose of avoiding the withholding requirement.

The sales price of the California real property conveyed does not exceed one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000.00), OR The seller executes a written certificate, under the penalty of perjury, of any of the following:

Escrow Holder will, upon written instructions from the purchaser, withhold Federal Income Tax from the seller and will deposit said tax with the Internal Revenue Service, together with IRS Forms 8288 and 8288-A. The fee charged for this service is $45.00 payable to the escrow holder.

1. 2.

The buyer may become subject to penalty for failure to withhold an amount equal to the greater of 10 percent of the amount required to be withheld or five hundred dollars ($500).

1. If the amount realized (generally the sales price) is $300,000 or less, and the property will be used by the Transferee as a residence (as provided for in the current regulations), no monies need be withheld or remitted to the IRS.

3. If the amount realized exceeds $1,000,000, then the withholding rate is 15% on the entire amount, regardless of use by the Transferee. The exemption for personal use as a residence does not apply in this scenario.

If the purchaser who is required to withhold income tax from the seller fails to do so, the purchaser is subject to fines and penalties as provided under Internal Revenue Code Section 1445.

The property qualifies as the seller's (or decedent's, if being sold by the decedent's estate) principal residence Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 121; or
The seller (or decedent, if being sold by the decedent's estate) last used the property as the seller's (decedent's) principal residence within the meaning of IRC Section 121 without regard to the two-year time period; or The seller has a loss or zero gain for California income tax purposes on this sale; or The property is being compulsorily or involuntarily converted and the seller intends to acquire property that is similar or related in service or use to qualify for non-recognition of gain for California income tax purposes under IRC Section 1033; or if the transfer qualifies for non-recognition treatment under IRC Section 351 (transfer to a corporation controlled by the transferor) or IRC Section 721 (contribution to a partnership in exchange for a partnership interest); or The seller is a corporation (or an LLC classified as a corporation for federal and California income tax purposes) that is either qualified through the California Secretary of State or has a permanent place of Business in California; or The seller is a partnership (or an LLC that is not a disregarded single member LLC and is classified as a partnership for federal and California income tax purposes) with recorded title to the property in the name of the partnership of LLC; or The seller is a tax-exempt entity under either California or federal law; or The seller is an insurance company, individual retirement account, qualified pension/profit sharing plan, or charitable remainder trust; or The transfer qualifies as a simultaneous like-kind exchange within the meaning of IRC Section 1031; or The transfer qualifies as a deferred like-kind exchange within the meaning of IRC Section 1031; or The transfer of this property will be an installment sale that you will report as such for California tax purposes and the buyer has agreed to withhold on each principal payment instead of withholding the full amount at the time of transfer.

2. If the amount realized exceeds $300,000 but does not exceed $1,000,000, and the property will be used by the Transferee as a residence, (as provided for in the current regulations) then the withholding rate is 10% on the full amount realized (generally the sales prices) In accordance with Sections 18662 and 18668 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, a transferee (Buyer) may be required to withhold an amount equal to 3 1/3 percent of the sales price or an alternative withholding amount certified to by the seller in the case of a disposition of California real property interest by either:

CLTA Preliminary Report

Page 16 of 22 ends

Upon the sale of United States real property, by a non-resident alien, foreign corporation, partnership or trust, the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act of 1980 (FIRPTA), and as revised by the Tax Reform Act of 1984 (26 USCA 897 (C)(1)(A)(1) and 26 USCA 1445), Revised by the Path Act of 2015, These changes may be reviewed in full in H.R. 2029, now known as Public Law 114-113. See Section 324 of the law for the full text of FIRPTA changes. Effective February 27, 2016, the amendments to FIRPTA contained in the PATH Act have increased the holdback rate from 10% of gross proceeds to 15% of gross proceeds of the sale, regardless of whether the actual tax due may exceed (or be less than) the amount withheld if ANY of the following conditions are met:

However, notwithstanding any other provision included in the California statutes referenced above, no buyer will be required to withhold any amount or be subject to penalty for failure to withhold if:
c.
d.

A seller who is an individual or when the disbursement instructions authorize the proceeds to be sent to a financial intermediary or the seller, OR
A corporate seller that has no permanent place of business in California. h.
i.
jk.

1. NOTICE
FEDERAL FOREIGN INVESTMENT IN REAL PROPERTY TAX ACT OF 1980 (FIRPTA) If you elect, funds deposited by you prior to the close of escrow may be placed in an individual interest-bearing account arrangement that the Company has established with one of its financial institutions. You do not have an opportunity to earn interest on the funds deposited by a lender. If you elect to earn interest through this special account arrangement, the Company will charge you an additional fee of $50.00 for the establishment and maintenance of the account. This fee compensates the Company for the costs associated with opening and managing the interest-bearing account, preparing correspondence/documentation, transferring funds, maintaining appropriate records for audit/reconciliation purposes, and filing any required tax withholding statements. It is important that you consider this cost in your decision since the cost may exceed the interest you earn.

Unless you elect otherwise (as described below), all funds received by (the "Company") in escrow will be deposited with other escrow funds in one or more non-interest bearing escrow accounts of the Company in a financial institution selected by the Company. The depositor acknowledges that the deposit of funds in a non-interest bearing demand account by Escrow Holder may result in said company receiving a range of economic benefits from the bank in the form of services, credits, considerations, or other things of value. The depositor hereby specifically waives any claim to such economic benefits payable to Escrow Holder resulting from non-interest bearing deposits. Unless you direct the Company to open an interest-bearing account (as described below), the Company shall have no obligation to account to you in any manner for the value of, or to compensate any party for, any benefit received by the Company and/or its affiliated company. Any such benefits shall be deemed additional compensation of the Company for its services in connection with the escrow.

CLTA Preliminary Report

Page 17 of 22 ends

NOTICE

DEPOSIT OF FUNDS AND DISBURSEMENT DISCLOSURE
MLHC

MOTHER LODE HOLDING COMPANY
This Privacy Policy (“Policy”) describes how Mother Lode Holding Company and its subsidiaries and affiliates (collectively, “Mother Lode,” “we, ‘us,” or “our”) collect, use, store, and share your information when: (1) when you access or use our websites, mobile Contact Us [email protected] or toll free at 1-877-626-0668 How Long Do We Keep Your Information? We keep your information for as long as necessary in accordance with the purpose for which it was collected, our business needs, and our legal and regulatory obligations.

Your Choices We provide you the ability to exercise certain controls and choices regarding our collection, use, storage, and sharing of your information. You can learn more about your choices by visiting https://www.mlhc.com/privacy-policy.

What Type Of Information Do We Collect About You? We collect a variety of categories of information about you. To learn more about the categories of information we collect, please visit https://www.mlhc.com/privacy-policy.

How Do We Collect Your Information? We collect your information: (1) directly from you; (2) automatically when you interact with us; and (3) from third parties, including business parties and affiliates.

How Do We Use Your Information? We may use your information in a variety of ways, including but not limited to providing the services you have requested, fulfilling your transactions, comply with relevant laws and our policies, and handling a claim. To learn more about how we may use your information, please visit https://www.mlhc.com/privacy-policy.

How Do We Share Your Information? We do not sell your personal information. We only share your information, including to subsidiaries, affiliates, and to unaffiliated third parties: (1) with your consent; (2) in a business transfer; (3) to service providers; (4) to subsidiaries and affiliates; and (5) for legal process and protection. To learn more about how we share your information, please visit https://www.mlhc.com/privacv-policy.

How Do We Store and Protect Your Information? The security of your information is important to us. That is why we take commercially reasonable steps to make sure your information is protected. We use our best efforts to maintain commercially reasonable technical, organizational, and physical safeguards, consistent with applicable law, to protect your information.

We may change this Privacy Notice from time to time. Any and all changes to this Privacy Notice will be reflected on this page, and where appropriate provided in person or by another electronic method. YOUR CONTINUED USE, ACCESS, OR INTERACTION WITH

OUR PRODUCTS OR YOUR CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS WITH US AFTER THIS NOTICE HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO YOU WILL REPRESENT THAT YOU HAVE READ AND UNDERSTOOD THIS PRIVACY NOTICE.

This Policy applies wherever it is posted. To the extent a Mother Lode subsidiary or affiliate has different privacy practices, such entity shall have their own privacy statement posted as applicable.

International Jurisdictions: Our Products are offered in the United States of America (US), and are subject to US federal, state, and local law. If you are accessing the Products from another country, please be advised that you may be transferring your information to us in the US, and you consent to that transfer and use of your information in accordance with this Privacy Notice. You also agree to abide by the applicable laws of applicable US federal, state, and local laws concerning your use of the Products, and your agreements with us.

CLTA Preliminary Report

Page 18 of 22 ends

applications, web-based applications, or other digital platforms where this Policy is posted (“Sites”); (2) when you use our products and services (“Services”); (3) when you communicate with us in any manner, including by e-mail, in-person, telephone, or other communication method (“Communications”); and (4) when we obtain your information from third parties, including service providers, business partners, and governmental departments and agencies (“Third Parties”).

Placer Title Co., Centric Title and Escrow, Montana Title and Escrow, National Closing Solutions, National Closing Solutions of Alabama, National Closing Solutions of Maryland, North Idaho Title Insurance, Placer Title Insurance Agency of Utah, Premier Reverse Closings, Premier Title Agency, Texas National Title, Washington Title and Escrow, Western Auxiliary Corp., Wyoming Title and Escrow

NOTICE AT COLLECTION AND PRIVACY POLICY
Updated December 1, 2022
For California Residents
Verification Process. For a request to know, correct or delete, we will verify your identity before responding to your request. To verify your identity, we will generally match the identifying information provided in your request with the information we have on file about you.

Depending on the sensitivity of the information requested, we may also utilize more stringent verification methods to verify your identity, including but not limited to requesting additional information from you and/or requiring you to sign a declaration under penalty of perjury.

Right to Correct. You have a right to request that we correct your personal information. This right is subject to certain exceptions available under the CCPA and other applicable law. To submit a verified request for correction, go to our online privacy policy at www.mlhc.com/privacy-policy or call toll-free at 1-877-626-0668.

If you are a California resident, you may have certain rights under California law, including but not limited to the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018, as amended by the California Privacy Rights Act and its implementing regulations (“CCPA”). All phrases used in this section shall have the same meaning as those phrases are used under California law, including the CCPA.

Notice of Sale and Share. We have not sold or shared the personal information of California residents in the past 12 months. To the extent any Mother Lode affiliated entity has a different practice, it will be stated in the applicable privacy policy. We do not knowingly sell or share the personal information of any California resident under the age of 16.

Notice of Collection. To learn more about the categories of personal information we have collected about California residents over the last 12 months, how we have used that information, and how we share that information, please see “California Privacy Rights Act and Disclosures” in https://www.mlhc.com/privacy-policy.

Notice of Disclosure. To learn more about the categories of personal information we may have disclosed about California residents in the past 12 months, please see “California Privacy Rights Act and Disclosures” in https://www.mlhc.com/privacy-policy.

Right of Non-Discrimination. You have a right to exercise your rights under California law, including under the CCPA, without suffering discrimination. Accordingly, Mother Lode will not discriminate against you in any way if you choose to exercise your rights under the CCPA.

CLTA Preliminary Report

Page 19 of 22 ends

Right of Deletion. You also have a right to request that we delete the personal information we have collected from and about you. This right is subject to certain exceptions available under the CCPA and other applicable law. To submit a verified request for deletion, go to our online privacy policy at www.mlhc.com/privacy-policy or call toll-free at 1-877-626-0668. You may also designate an authorized agent to submit a request on your behalf by going to our online privacy policy at www.mlhc.com/privacv-policy or by calling toll-free at 1- 877-626-0668.

GRAMM-LEACH-BLILEY ACT PRIVACY POLICY NOTICE
The types of personal information we collect and share depend on the transaction involved. This information may include:

We may disclose any of the above information that we collect about our customers or former customers to our affiliates or to non-affi Hates as permitted by law for our everyday business purposes, such as to process your transactions and respond to legal and regulatory matters. We do not sell your personal information or share it for marketing purposes.

We do not share any nonpublic personal information about you with anyone for any purpose that is not specifically permitted by law.

We collect this information from you, such as on an application or other forms, from our files, and from our affiliates or others involved in your transaction, such as the real estate agent or lender.

We restrict access to nonpublic personal information about you to those employees who need to know that information in order to provide products or services to you. We maintain physical, electronic and procedural safeguards that comply with federal regulations to guard your nonpublic personal information.

Mother Lode Holding Co.

Montana Title and Escrow Co.

National Closing Solutions, Inc.

National Closing Solutions of Alabama
National Closing Solutions of Maryland
Premier Reverse Closings
Centric Title and Escrow
Identity information such as Social Security number and driver's license information.

Financial information such as mortgage loan account balances, checking account information and wire transfer instructions
Information from others involved in your transaction such as documents received from your lender Questions about this notice and privacy policy may be sent to MLHC Counsel, Legal Dept., 1508 Eureka Rd., #130, Roseville, CA 95661 or [email protected].

CLTA Preliminary Report

Page 20 of 22 ends

Placer Title Co.

Placer Title Insurance Agency of Utah
Premier Title Agency
North Idaho Title Insurance Co.

Texas National Title
Western Auxiliary Corp.

Wyoming Title and Escrow Co.

Title V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) requires financial companies to provide you with a notice of their privacy policies and practices, such as the types of nonpublic personal information that they collect about you and the categories of persons or entities to whom it may be disclosed. In compliance with the Gramm-Leach-Bliley-Act, we are notifying you of the privacy policies and practices of:

CLTA Preliminary Report

Page 21 of 22 ends

Privacy Notice
Effective: October 1,2019
Notice Last Updated: January 1, 2021
This Privacy Notice describes how First American Financial Corporation and its subsidiaries and affiliates (together referred to as “First American,” “we,” “us,” or “our”) collect, use, store, and share your information. This Privacy Notice applies to information we receive from you offline only, as well as from third parties, when you interact with us and/or use and access our services and products (“Products”). For more information about our privacy practices, including our online practices, please visit https://www.firstam.com/privacv-policy/. The practices described in this Privacy Notice are subject to applicable laws in the places in which we operate.

How Do We Share Your Information? We do not sell your information. We only share your information, including to subsidiaries, affiliates, and to unaffiliated third parties: (1) with your consent; (2) in a business transfer; (3) to service providers; and (4) for legal process and protection. To learn more about how we share your information, please visit https://www.firstam.com/privacv-policy/.

How Long Do We Keep Your Information? We keep your information for as long as necessary in accordance with the purpose for which it was collected, our business needs, and our legal and regulatory obligations.

International Jurisdictions Our Products are offered in the United States of America (US), and are subject to US federal, state, and local law. If you are accessing the Products from another country, please be advised that you may be transferring your information to us in the US, and you consent to that transfer and use of your information in accordance with this Privacy Notice. You also agree to abide by the applicable laws of applicable US federal, state, and local laws concerning your use of the Products, and your agreements with us.

OR INTERACTION WITH OUR PRODUCTS OR YOUR CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS WITH US AFTER THIS

NOTICE HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO YOU WILL REPRESENT THAT YOU HAVE READ AND UNDERSTOOD THIS PRIVACY NOTICE.

For California Residents
residents over the last 12 months, please “What Information Do We Collect About You” insee CLTA Preliminary Report

Page 22 of 22 ends

Verification Process. For either a request to know or delete, we will verify your identity before responding to your request. To verify your identity, we will generally match the identifying information provided in your request with the information we have on file about you. Depending on the sensitivity of the information requested, we may also utilize more stringent verification methods to verify your identity, including but not limited to requesting additional information from you and/or requiring you to sign a declaration under penalty of perjury.

Notice of Sale. We do not sell California resident information, nor have we sold California resident information in the past 12 months. We have no actual knowledge of selling the information of minors under the age of 16.

Right of Non-Discrimination. You have a right to exercise your rights under California law, including under the CCPA, without suffering discrimination. Accordingly, First American will not discriminate against you in any way if you choose to exercise your rights under the CCPA.

Notice of Collection. To learn more about the categories of personal information we have collected about California If you are a California resident, you may have certain rights under California law, including but not limited to the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 (“CCPA”). All phrases used in this section shall have the same meaning as those phrases are used under California law, including the CCPA.

Right to Know. You have a right to request that we disclose the following information to you: (1) the categories of personal information we have collected about or from you; (2) the categories of sources from which the personal information was collected; (3) the business or commercial purpose for such collection and/or disclosure; (4) the categories of third parties with whom we have shared your personal information; and (5) the specific pieces of your personal information we have collected. To submit a verified request for this information, go to our online privacy policy at www.firstam.com/privacy-policy to submit your request or call toll-free at 1-866-718-0097. You may also designate an authorized agent to submit a request on your behalf by going to our online privacy policy at www.firstam.com/privacypolicy to submit your request or by calling toll-free at 1-866-718-0097 Right of Deletion. You also have a right to request that we delete the personal information we have collected from and about you. This right is subject to certain exceptions available under the CCPA and other applicable law. To submit a verified request for deletion, go to our online privacy policy at www.firstam.com/privacy-policy to submit your request or call toll-free at 1-866-718-0097. You may also designate an authorized agent to submit a request on your behalf by going to our online privacy policy at www.firstam.com/privacy-policy to submit your request or by calling toll-free at 1-866-718- 0097.
https://www.firstam.com/privacy-policy. To learn about the sources from which we have collected that information, the business and commercial purpose for its collection, and the categories of third parties with whom we have shared that information, please see “How Do We Collect Your Information”, “How Do We Use Your Information”, and “How Do We Share Your Information” in https://www.firstam.com/privacy-policy.

Notice of Sale. We have not sold the personal information of California residents in the past 12 months.

Notice of Disclosure. To learn more about the categories of personal information we may have disclosed about California residents in the past 12 months, please see “How Do We Use Your Information” and “How Do We Share Your Information” in https://www.firstam.com/privacy-policy.

L]
)
E. “I
(21)
E. CAMBRIDGE AVE.

F.M.F.C.D. •f
116.28Ad
3 13Q5.Z4'.
37)P 14
G
1306.53'
13Q4.34' Al
1300.40
C.U.S.D.

38.90AC.
8 2 Lco 30'—
DETAIL 'A' " 18
O I NTS o 60 — ■ -
■NE COR. LOT 18 co
O- ^-30'
C
2 -20'
.30’ O
^CLINTON AVE. 2 E.
36’>
V— CLINTON
837.15'

35.32'
541.76' U RS 37-65
(33)
C.U.S.D. OJ\
(98 OV "A
20 19.72AC.

I
C
(99) “o 1295.73'
I.F.C.D. 1/LL “o MILL DITCH 49 '36P 14 19
15 11
63-6 6-
112.67'
1323.86' F.M.F.C.D. 910.72'
306791'^
117V 20
18 s 4 (05.

F.M.F.C.D.
@T
'' 23.93AC.,
180AC.
1 }__________ ।
O2Q

19.80Ac.^
F.M.F.C.D^
Oy

0.01 Ac. M.T.C.L.c
(28) 9
\574/
22 23

0.05AC.

0.03Ac^S
T60.86 MILL DITCH 8‘ 661.76’;
8 " 7503.63^^^,97' “[503.

Telbt (33)29 30)
1323.46' 8
44 Me KINLEY
£A 2
(6 3.98Ac. 1.68AC. 3.62Ac.

RS 39-97
RS 45-23
2053
l. 36'
/22)T 1
2A8Ac.

C2
l i
coO
C
Q
so
l
I
L
C
(O
O
0 co
to
26125
3536
SEE
DETAIL 'A' .
5 F.M.F.C.D.
(24)T

2.28AC.
619.53’ /
164.62'T 92
co co
RS 45-23
RS 39-97 1323.63'
F.MFC.D
@T /
’ 0.08Ac. J
O.
8 21
O O C co
J i
(25)

23.50Ac.
(27)

24.00Ac.
30'-»
17 78 227
5 ,8
^15.51ACP

17.95% (18)
2239
/I
1 8
3 ono"
323.74'
Pl F.M.F.C.D,
__ 7
1258.85'
SWCOR. । 8
SEC 26 \g(
F.M.F.C.D J.
(17)1
F.M.F.C.D.
®ST
76X9AC. F.M.F.C.D.
(32jF~
i
u
Q
4 —. 30‘-
A
---
V
Te2
2726
34 35
% 6
.N
1304.08
11 1304.51'
(31) uj
)
T
I
r
55‘
o
30'
co
C
O
T 33.13‘
185.17'
Q
'

30.26 ' I
I l'
’ I,
26 "
<
AN c o —
310-05
8 N Q -
uj
RNN
I 1"=800'
uj
)“1
24\19
2530
AVE.

Tax Rate Area
5-3965-457
76-052
SUBDIVIDED LAND & SEC. 25 & 26, T13S., R21E., M.D.B.&M. 23 24
26 25 E. SHIELDS
uj
) Tr
“I
K.C.

DETAIL 'B'
NTS
-NOTEThis map is for Assessment purposes only.

It is not to be construed as portraying legal
ownership or divisions of land for purposes
of zoning or subdivision law.

Assessor's Map Bk.310- Pg.05
County of Fresno, Calif.
11/23/2021
Note - Assessor's Block Numbers Shown in Ellipses
Assessor's Parcel Numbers Shown in Circles
Kutner Colony - R.S. Bk. 2, Pg. 8
Record of Survey - Bk. 37, Pgs. 65-67Record of Survey - Bk. 39, Pgs. 97-100Record of Survey - Bk. 45, Pgs. 23-24Record of Survey - Bk. 63, Pg. 6 Sub. of Sec. 26, T.13S., R.21E. - Plat Bk. 2, Pg. 40
N
S'
(
Ui
C
U. uJ
.89499 641.64'
644.41
o
643.49'
661.59' 641.59'
N. LEONARD
) 664.41'
663.49'
IT
N. HIGHLAND
)
[T
641.60'_ .09 i99
Co
N
gKrazan do. abr
& ASSOCIATES, INC.

Property Name: McKinley Ranch Property
Address/APN: 7298 E McKinley Avenue
City/State/Zip: Fresno, CA 93737
Respondent Information:

Name: Mr. Brandon De Young
Date: January 19, 2024
Company: De Young Properties
Phone: 559-435-0900

2. Are you aware of any activity use limitations (AULs) such as engineering controls, land use restrictions, or institutional controls that are in place at the subject site and/or have been filed or recorded in a registry under federal, tribal, state, or local law? No

1. Are you aware of any environmental cleanup liens against the subject site that are filed or recorded under federal, tribal, state, or local law?
No
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.

With Offices Serving the Western United States

PHASE I ESA

USER QUESTIONNAIRE
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING

CONSTRUCTION TESTING & INSPECTION
Introduction
“In order to qualify for one of the Landowner Liability Protections (LLPs) offered by the Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfield Revitalization Act of 2001 (the ‘Brownfields Amendments’), the user must provide the following inquiries required by 40 CFR §§ 312.25, 312.28, 312.29, 312.30 and 312.31.

The user should provide the following information (if available) to the environmental professional.

Failure to provide this information could result in a determination that 'all appropriate inquiry' is not complete.” - American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) El 527-21 Appendix X3. User Questionnaire
User Questionnaire Page No. 2 of 3
A.

5. Are you aware of commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information about the subject site that would help the environmental professional to identify conditions indicative of releases or threatened releases? For example:

6. As the user of the Phase I ESA, based on your knowledge and experience related to the subject site, are there any obvious indicators that point to the presence or likely presence of contamination at the subject site?
No

7. What is the reason for preparation of this Phase I ESA? (Property purchase/sale; bank loan; proposed development; etc.)
Property purchase

4. Does the purchase price being paid for the subject site reasonably reflect the fair market value of the subject site? Yes
Do you know of spills or other chemical releases that have taken place at the subject site? If so, briefly explain.

No
Do you know of any environmental cleanups that have taken place at the subject site? If so, briefly explain.

No
Do you know the past uses of the subject site? If so, briefly explain.

No
Do you know of specific chemicals that are present or once were present at the subject site? If so, briefly explain.

No
A. If you conclude that there is a difference, have you considered whether the lower purchase price is because contamination is known or believed to be present at the subject site? N/A

3. As the user of the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA), do you have any specialized knowledge or experience related to the subject site or nearby properties? For example, are you involved in the same line of business as the current or former occupants of the subject site or an adjacent property so that you would have specialized knowledge of the chemicals and processes used by this type of business?
No
I, the user of this Phase I ESA (or authorized representative of the User), do hereby attest that I have carefully considered the questions herein and have presented answers to the best of my knowledge and ability based upon the Responsibilities of the User as required within ASTM El 527-21 guidance.

KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.

With Offices Serving the Western United States
User Questionnaire Page No. 3 of 3
Date: January 19, 2024
Signature
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.

With Offices Serving the Western United States
Name: Brandon De Young
(Please Print)

ASBESTOS SURVEY

ZANINOVICH PROPERTY
7298 EAST MCKINLEY AVENUE

FRESNO, CALIFORNIA
Project No. 014-16208
December 28, 2016
Prepared for:

Jeffrey Harris
Wilson Homes
7550 North Palm Avenue, Suite 102
Fresno, California 93711
(559) 224-7550
Prepared by:

Krazan & Associates, Inc.
215 West Dakota Avenue
Clovis, California 93612
(559) 348-2200

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Project No. 014-16208
Page

1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 1

2.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF WORK ..................................................................................................... 1

3.0 BUILDING DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................................. 1

4.0 INVESTIGATIVE METHODS .............................................................................................................. 2

4.1 Sampling Protocols ............................................................................................................................. 2

4.2 Laboratory Analytical Methods .......................................................................................................... 2

5.0 RESULTS OF INVESTIGATION ......................................................................................................... 2

6.0 CONCLUSIONS ..................................................................................................................................... 3

7.0 LIMITATIONS ....................................................................................................................................... 4 Figures
Asbestos Survey Results ........................................................................................................... following text Floor Plan ............................................................................................................................ following Results Appendices
Analytical Results and Chain-of-Custody Record ....................................................................................... A DOSH Certifications .....................................................................................................................................B

& A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING  ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING

CONSTRUCTION TESTING & INSPECTION
215 West Dakota Avenue • Clovis, California 93612 • (559) 348-2200 • FAX (559) 348-2190 With Offices Serving the Western United States 1416208 Asbestos.doc December 28, 2016 Project No. 014-16208

ASBESTOS SURVEY

ZANINOVICH PROPERTY
7298 EAST MCKINLEY AVENUE

FRESNO, CALIFORNIA

1.0 INTRODUCTION
This report presents the results of our asbestos survey for the structures located at 7298 E. McKinley Ave. in Fresno, California. The asbestos survey was conducted under the conditions of Krazan & Associates, Inc.’s (Krazan’s) Proposal No. P16-365, dated December 8, 2016. Jeffrey Harris gave written authorization on December 9, 2016, for Krazan to proceed with the asbestos survey.

2.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF WORK
The purpose of the asbestos survey was to identify and quantify the presence of potential asbestoscontaining materials (ACMs) at the on-site structures. The scope of work for the asbestos survey included conducting a visual survey of the structures and conducting bulk sampling and analysis of materials suspected to contain asbestos. This survey was performed in accordance with applicable local, state, and federal regulations.

3.0 BUILDING DESCRIPTION
Main Residence
The site is located on the north side of McKinley, east of Temperance in Fresno, California. The structure was a single-story wood-framed structure with pier and post foundation, stucco, wood, and brick exterior walls, with composite shingle roof. Interior construction included gypsum board, plaster, and acoustic ceiling tiled ceilings; gypsum board, plaster, wood, and brick walls; and wood/concrete floors overlain (in areas) by sheet flooring, wall-to-wall carpeting, floor tiles, and ceramic tiles.

Krazan a” Abo
Project No. 014-16208
Page No. 2
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.

With Offices Serving the Western United States 1416208 Asbestos.doc Nanny House
The structure was a single-story wood-framed structure with concrete slab-on-grade foundation, stucco and wood exterior walls, with composite shingle over wood shingle roofing. Interior construction included gypsum board ceilings; gypsum board and stucco walls; and concrete floors overlain (in areas) by sheet flooring, wall-to-wall carpeting, and floor tiles. A small shed is located in front of the house of wood construction with composite shingle roof.

4.0 INVESTIGATIVE METHODS

4.1 Sampling Protocols
Thirty-five (35) samples of suspected ACMs were collected from throughout the on-site structures.

Sample locations for this survey were chosen in a semi-random fashion with emphasis placed on minimizing damage to the sampled materials. The samples were collected by carefully removing a small amount of the suspect material in a non-abrasive manner. If possible, samples were collected from existing damaged areas or loose pieces of materials. Each sample was placed in a separate sealed plastic bag, and labeled with the project number and sample number. Refer to the Floor Plan following the text for the bulk sample locations.

4.2 Laboratory Analytical Methods
The bulk samples collected were analyzed by A.E.S.L. Environmental of Tempe, Arizona, to detect the presence, type, and percentage of asbestos by polarized light microscopy/dispersion staining, following the procedure described in 40 CFR 763, Subpart E, Appendix A (AHERA). Copies of the Analytical Results and Chain-of-Custody Record are included in Appendix A.

5.0 RESULTS OF INVESTIGATION
As stated previously, 35 samples of suspected ACMs were collected from throughout the structures.

Analytical laboratory results and field observations of the materials sampled have been summarized on Table I, following the text of this report. Information presented within the table includes the sample number, the sample description, the location where the sample was obtained, the asbestos content, the volume of ACMs identified (typically expressed in square feet), the condition of the material sampled, and a listing of locations where similar (homogenous) ACMs were also noted (although not necessarily Project No. 014-16208
Page No. 3
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.

With Offices Serving the Western United States 1416208 Asbestos.doc sampled in these areas). In addition, footnotes have been provided to convey pertinent information regarding the specific sample or homogenous material.

The following materials were identified as containing at least one percent asbestos:

Main Residence
9-in by 9-in Floor tile and mastic – family room under carpet (Sample No. 12). This material would be considered a Category I non-friable ACM under the NESHAP Regulations.

Nanny House
9-in by 9-in Floor tile and mastic – kitchen, living room, bedroom (Sample No. 28). This material would be considered a Category I non-friable ACM under the NESHAP Regulations.

Sheet flooring mastic (black) – bathroom (Sample No. 29). This material would be considered a Category I non-friable ACM under the NESHAP Regulations.

The following materials were identified as containing trace asbestos, point count results included.

Main Residence
Window putty – exterior (Sample No. 13).

Nanny House
Texture – throughout structure interior (Sample Nos. 25, 26, and 27).

Window putty – exterior (Sample No. 30).

6.0 CONCLUSIONS
The National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) defines regulated asbestoscontaining materials (RACM) as the following: friable materials containing more than one percent asbestos as determined by polarized light microscopy; Category I non-friable materials (i.e., floor tiles, asphalt roofing products) containing more than one percent asbestos that have become friable, have been subjected to or will be subjected to sanding, grinding, cutting, or abrading; and Category II non-friable materials (i.e., non-friable asbestos-containing materials that are not Category I materials) containing more than one percent asbestos that have a high probability of becoming or have already been reduced to a friable condition by demolition or renovation activities. The above-noted samples that contain greater than one percent asbestos may meet the definition of a RACM under the NESHAP depending on the abatement method employed. In addition, the California Division of Occupational Safety and Health Project No. 014-16208
Page No. 4
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.

With Offices Serving the Western United States 1416208 Asbestos.doc (Cal-OSHA) defines asbestos-containing construction material (ACCM) as greater than 0.1 percent asbestos. The above-noted samples that contain greater than 0.1 percent asbestos would meet the definition of an ACCM.

If these asbestos-containing materials are left in place, the occupants of the structure should avoid buffing, sanding, grinding, or abrading these materials in any way. These activities could potentially release asbestos fibers. An Operations and Maintenance Program (O&M Program) could be developed for the management of asbestos-containing materials if left in place. The development and implementation of such a program would require the designation and training of an asbestos program manager. The asbestos program manager would be responsible for conducting periodic inspections of the asbestos-containing materials, record keeping requirements, and providing awareness training necessary for any maintenance or custodial personnel required to clean or repair these materials. Furthermore, it is recommended that the asbestos program manager notify all potentially affected individuals.

When building maintenance, repair, renovation, or other activities disturb or damage ACMs, asbestos fibers may be released creating a potential hazard. Therefore, removal of friable and non-friable ACMs that have the potential to become friable during demolition and/or renovation is federally regulated under the NESHAP. The San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (APCD) is the responsible agency on the local level to enforce the NESHAP. The APCD Regional Office requires that asbestos-containing materials (ACM) be removed prior to renovation or demolition activities. Additionally, the APCD must be notified prior to any demolition and/or renovation activities.

7.0 LIMITATIONS
This survey and review of the subject property has been limited in scope. This investigation is undertaken with the risk that visual observations and random sampling alone would not reveal the presence, full nature, and extent of asbestos-containing materials. Krazan makes no representation as to the asbestos content of materials not sampled or that were inaccessible to our inspector (i.e., between walls, beneath floors, in pipe chases, etc.). The asbestos sample locations and building dimensions were measured/located in the field by tape measurement from existing features. Therefore, the sample locations, building dimensions, and approximate square footage of asbestos-containing materials should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the methods used.

Project No. 014-16208
Page No. 5
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.

With Offices Serving the Western United States 1416208 Asbestos.doc The findings presented in this report were based on field observations, random sampling and analysis, review of available data, and discussions with local regulatory and advisory agencies. Therefore, the data obtained are clear and accurate only to the degree implied by the sources and methods used. The information presented herewith was based on professional interpretation using presently accepted methods with a degree of conservatism deemed proper as of the report date. We do not warrant that future technical developments cannot supersede such data.

This asbestos survey is not intended to be the sole basis for asbestos removal bids. Confirmation of the condition and volume of the ACMs should be conducted by prospective removal contractors prior to accepting removal bids. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the client noted on the cover page and is subject to the terms and conditions in the applicable contract between the Client and Krazan. The client is the only party to whom Krazan has explained the risks involved and has been involved in the shaping of the scope of services needed to satisfactorily manage those risks, if any, from the client’s point of view. Any third party use of this report, including use by the Client’s lender, prospective purchaser, or lessee will be subject to the terms and conditions governing the contractual work between the Client and Krazan. The unauthorized use of, reliance on, or release of the information contained in this report, without the expressed written consent of Krazan, is strictly prohibited and will be without risk or liability to Krazan.

Asbestos analysis was conducted by a laboratory accredited under the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) administered by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). The results of the asbestos analyses are accurate only to the degree and care of ensuring the testing accuracy and the representative nature of the samples obtained.

If you have any questions or if we may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact our office at (559) 348-2200.

Respectfully submitted,
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Jeffrey R. Noël
DOSH Certified Asbestos Consultant
No. 00-2828
JRN/atd
2c: herewith
DD

TABLE I

ASBESTOS ANALYSIS RESULTS
Zaninovich Property
7298 East McKinley Avenue
Fresno, California
December 20, 2016 Sampling
Asbestos Approx. Condition / Notes/
Sample No. Sample Description Structure Sample Location Content Sq. Ft. Friability Additional locations 1 Plaster main residence entry closet ND NC NA homogenous throughout2 Plaster main residence bathroom ND NC NA homogenous throughout3 Plaster main residence bedroom ND NC NA homogenous throughout4 Skim coat main residence entry closet ND NC NA homogenous throughout5 Skim coat main residence bathroom ND NC NA homogenous throughout6 Skim coat main residence bedroom ND NC NA homogenous throughout7 12-in by 12-in Ceiling tile main residence family room ND NC NA8 Sheet flooring / mastic main residence laundry ND NC NA also in kitchen, bathroom9 Wallpaper main residence entry ND NC NA 10 Wallpaper main residence bathroom ND NC NA11 Gypsum board main residence family room ND NC NA plaster backer board, homogenous throughout12 9-in by 9-in Floor tile / mastic main residence family room 3% / 2% 500 G/NF under carpet 13 Window putty main residence exterior Trace <50 NA
14 Stucco main residence exterior ND NC NA homogenous throughout15 Stucco main residence exterior ND NC NA homogenous throughout16 Stucco main residence exterior ND NC NA homogenous throughout17 Gypsum board main residence heater room ND NC NA homogenous throughout18 Composite shingle main residence roof ND NC NA19 Roofing felt main residence roof ND NC NA under # 1820 Interior surface main residence swimming pool ND NC NA21 Concrete deck main residence swimming pool ND NC NA NA = Not applicable F = Fair conditionNC = Not calculated G = Good conditionND = None detected NF = Non-friableTrace = Less than one percent (<1%) chrysotile asbestos FR = Friable KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Serving the Western United States 1416208 Table I.xlsx
TABLE I (Continued)

ASBESTOS ANALYSIS RESULTS
Zaninovich Property
7298 East McKinley Avenue
Fresno, California
December 20, 2016 Sampling
Asbestos Approx. Condition / Notes/
Sample No. Sample Description Structure Sample Location Content Sq. Ft. Friability Additional locations 22 Gypsum board / taping material nanny house living room ND NC NA homogenous throughout23 Gypsum board / taping material nanny house kitchen ND NC NA homogenous throughout24 Gypsum board / taping material nanny house bedroom ND NC NA homogenous throughout 25 Texture nanny house bedroom Trace NC NA homogenous throughout26 Texture nanny house living room Trace NC NA homogenous throughout27 Texture nanny house bedroom Trace NC NA homogenous throughout 28 9-in by 9-in Floor tile / mastic nanny house kitchen 3% / 2% 475 G/NF also in living room, bedroom29 Sheet flooring / mastic nanny house bathroom ND / 2% 30 G/NF 30 Window putty nanny house exterior Trace <25 NA
31 Stucco nanny house laundry ND NC NA homogenous throughout32 Stucco nanny house exterior ND NC NA homogenous throughout33 Stucco nanny house exterior ND NC NA homogenous throughout34 Composite shingle nanny house roof ND NC NA over wood shingle roofing35 Composite shingle shed roof ND NC NA NA = Not applicable F = Fair conditionNC = Not calculated G = Good conditionND = None detected NF = Non-friableTrace = Less than one percent (<1%) chrysotile asbestos FR = Friable KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Serving the Western United States 1416208 Table I.xlsx
1,4
N
Scale: Date:

Drawn by:

J. R. N.

Project No.
014-16208
12 / 16
Approved by:

Figure No.

FLOOR PLAN WITH BUILDING MATERIAL

SAMPLE LOCATIONS

ZANINOVICH PROPERTY
7298 EAST MCKINLEY AVENUE

FRESNO, CALIFORNIA
J.R.N
1 NOT TO SCALE

EXPLANATION

BUILDING MATERIAL SAMPLE LOCATION
2,5
3,6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18,19
20 21
22 23
24 25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 34
35 A
Z
A
A
A A
A
A
A
Z
A
A
A
A
A
A A
A
A
A
ENGINEERS, GEOLOGISTS AND ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALISTS alramam Offices Serving the Western United States
A
A
A/
A
A
Appendix A

LABORATORY

BULK ASBESTOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY REPORT
CLIENT NAME:

A.E.S.L. LABORATORY #: 16-A1037

TEST RESULTS
n.d. % & TypePos. /
8 a White Sheet Flooring n.d.A1037-8
==**==* = =
A1037-9
A1037-10 Tan Wallpaper10 n.d.

A1037-11 11 White Gypsum n.d.

A1037-12
A1037-15
A1037-16
A1037-17
A1037-18 Brown Composite Shingle18 n.d.

A1037-19 19 Black Felt n.d.

A1037-20
A1037-21 Tan Pool Deck21 n.d.

NVLAP 200303-0 CALIF. ELAP 2345 COLORADO CDPHE AL-21765 Krazan & Associates, Inc
215 West Dakota Avenue
Clovis, California 93612
OTHER

MATERIALS
A1037-1
A1037-2
A1037-3
A1037-4
A1037-5
A1037-6
A1037-7
A1037-13
A1037-14
8d
9 Yellow Mastic
White Wallpaper
n.d.
n.d.
3% Chrysotile
2% Chrysotile

0.60% Chrysotile*
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.

December 21,2016
Good
December 21,2016
8b
8 c
20 a
20 b
12 a
12 b
13 14 a
14b
15 a
15 b
16a
16b
17 PROJECT: Zaninovich Property
Project ID 014-16208
DATE OF RECEIPT:

SAMPLE CONDITION:

DATE ANALYZED:
100% Non-Fibrous
100%Non-Fibrous
100% Non-Fibrous
100% Non-Fibrous
100% Non-Fibrous
100% Non-Fibrous
10% Cellulose
90% Non-Fibrous
20% Cellulose
80% Non-Fibrous
100% Non-Fibrous
20% Cellulose
80% Non-Fibrous
100% Non-Fibrous
10% Cellulose
90% Non-Fibrous
10% Cellulose
90% Non-Fibrous
10% Cellulose
90% Non-Fibrous
97% Non-Fibrous
98% Non-Fibrous
99% Non-Fibrous
100% Non-Fibrous
100% Non-Fibrous
100% Non-Fibrous
100% Non-Fibrous
100% Non-Fibrous
100% Non-Fibrous
10% Cellulose
90% Non-Fibrous
35% Fibrous Glass
65% Non-Fibrous
40% Cellulose
60% Non-Fibrous
100% Non-Fibrous
60% Cellulose
40% Non-Fibrous
100% Non-Fibrous
Yellow Mastic
Tan Sheet Flooring
Positive
Positive
Trace
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.

Brown 9x9 Floor Tile
Black Mastic
Window Putty_______
Grey Stucco________
Green Paint
Grey Stucco________
Green Paint
Grey Stucco________
Green Paint
White Gypsum
A DIVISION OF ALLEN ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING L.L.C.
500 East Southern Avenue, Suite A-» Tempe, Arizona 85282 (480) 966-3714 • Fax (480) 394-0188
Grey Plaster
Brown Moisture Barrier
A.E.S.L. LAB
SAMPLE ID#
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.

CLIENT

SAMPLE ID
#
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 — A, Et St L, T
nvironmental
SAMPLE

DESCRIPTION
& COLOR
Grey Plaster___________
Grey Plaster___________
Grey Plaster__________
White Skim Coat
White Skim Coat
White Skim Coat
White 12x12 Ceiling Tile

TEST RESULTS
Pos. / n.d. % & Type
A1037-22 n.d.

A1037-23
A1037-24
A1037-29
A1037-32
A1037-33
A1037-34
A1037-35 35 Brown Composite Shingle n.d.

Method: Polarized Light Microscopy, EPA Method 600/R-93/116 Review and QA/QC by: Jerry A. Denton, Laboratory Director Z:\AESL\buik\16-a000\l6-AlO37.doc
OTHER

MATERIALS
A1037-25
A1037-26
A1037-27
A1037-28
A1037-30
A1037-31
Joint Compound
White Gypsum
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.

Joint Compound
White Gypsum
2% Chrysotile

0.40% Chrysotile*
n.d. = Non Detect
* PLM 1000 Point Count
22 b
23 a
23 b
24 a
24 b
25 26
27 28 a
28 b
29 a
29 b
30 31 a
31 b
32 a
32 b
33 a
33 b
34 10% Cellulose
90% Non-Fibrous
100% Non-Fibrous
10% Cellulose
90% Non-Fibrous
100% Non-Fibrous
10% Cellulose
90% Non-Fibrous
100% Non-Fibrous
99% Non-Fibrous
99% Non-Fibrous
99% Non-Fibrous
97% Non-Fibrous
98% Non-Fibrous
20% Cellulose
80% Non-Fibrous
98% Non-Fibrous
99% Non-Fibrous
100% Non-Fibrous
100% Non-Fibrous
100% Non-Fibrous
100% Non-Fibrous
100% Non-Fibrous
100% Non-Fibrous
35% Fibrous Glass
65% Non-Fibrous
35% Fibrous Glass
65% Non-Fibrous

Page 2 ends

AESLNo. 16-A1037
Positive
Trace
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.

Joint Compound
White Texture
White Texture
White Texture
Tan 9x9 Floor Tile
Black Mastic
Tan Sheet Flooring
Black Mastic
Window Putty__________
Grey Stucco_________
White Paint
Grey Stucco_________
White Paint
Grey Stucco_________
White Paint
Brown Composite Shingle
A. E. S. L.

EnvironmentaL

LABORATORY
n.d.

Trace
Trace
Trace
Positive
Positive
n.d.

A.E.S.L. LAB
SAMPLE ID#
This report cannot be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written consent of A.E.S.L.

The result quantitations reported are an estimation based on the methods of visual microscopic estimation, which is considered only a semi-quant technique. Also, this report is indicative only of the sample material A.E.S.L. Laboratory received. Results do not necessarily reflect the makeup entire span of the material from which the samples were derived. Sampling techniques and/or sample handling may affect the integrity of the sam before submission to A.E.S.L. Laboratory and hence the outcome of the laboratory results. Samples not destroyed by testing are retained a minim thirty days. A.E.S.L. Laboratory, recommends re-analysis by point count or Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) for materials that are iden contain less than ten percent (<10%) asbestos by PLM.

CLIENT

SAMPLE ID
#
22 a
SAMPLE

DESCRIPTION
________ & COLOR
White Gypsum

0.60% Chrysotile*

0.40% Chrysotile*

0.30% Chrysotile*
3% Chrysotile
2% Chrysotile

POINT COUNT TRACE RESULTS
A.E.S.L. LABORATORY «: /(-AJ037 PO #: 14-
Page .1 of _1 TURNAROUND TIME:___ HR / Same Dat 24HR48HR Client Name: Krazan & Associates, Inc. Contact: Jeff Nol Phone: (559) 348-2200 Fax: (559) 348-2201 Address: 215 West Dakota Avenue City. Clovis State: California Zip: 93612 PROJECT NAME: Zaninovich Property PROJECT ID #: 014-16208 DATE SAMPLES TAKEN: 12/20/16 SAMPLES RECVD (#): DATE RECVD: CONDITION: SAMPLES ACCEPTED (Y.N): IF NO. WHY? D
)
RELINQUISHED BY: DATE: /22
RECEIVED AT A.E.S.L. BY:FAX (480) 394-0188 CAel DATE: /2-2-1-/0 =
G.EnNOELAESL_COC XLS
TEMPE, ARIZONA 85282
PHONE (480) 966-3714
A.E.S.L. ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY
500 EAST SOUTHERN AVENUE, Suite A
A.E.S.L.

Sample #
A.E.S.L.

Sample #
• • ' SAMPLES TO BE RETURNED TO CLIENT AFTER 30 DAYS OR DISPOSED OF BY A.E.S.L. (DR):
( IF NOT SPECIFIED WILL AUTOMATICALLY BE DISPOSED OF AFTER 30 DAYS ) Client
ID#
31 3233 3435

BULK ASBESTOS SAMPLE

CHAIN OF CUSTODY
Sample
Description
Stucco Stucco Stucco
Composite shingle
Composite shingle
Sample
Location
7298 E McKinley Ave
Sample
Location
7298 E McKinley Ave
Sample
Description
Plaster Plaster
Plaster
Skim coatSkim coatSkim coat
12-in by 12-in Ceiling tile
Sheet flooring
Wallpaper Wallpaper
GB
9-in by 9-in Floor tile / mastic
Window putty
Stucco Stucco
Stucco
GB
Composite shingle
Roofing felt
Swimming pool interior
Swimming pool deck
GBTM
GBTM
GBTM
Texture Texture
Texture
9-in by 9-in Floor tile / mastic
Sheet flooring
Window putty
Client
ID#
1 23 45 67 89
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Appendix B
Edmund G. Brown, Jr. Governor
http://www.dir.ca.gov/dirdatabases.html actu@@dir.ca.gov 009132828C 210
August 03, 2016
’ CA 93611
Dear Certified Asbestos Consultant or Technician:
ificerely, Nl Si
Attachment: Certification Card
cc: File
Expires on 10/18/17
by Sections 7180atseq. othe Business and
Professions Code.

Renewal - Card Attached (Revised 10/24/2012)
Enclosed is your certification card. To maintain your certification, you must abide by the rules printed on the back of the certification card.

Jeffrey Ronald Noel
1055 Chennault Ave
Clovis
Please contact our office at the above address, fax number or email; of any changes in your contact/mailing information within 15 days of the change.

Please hold and do not send copies of your required AHERA refresher renewal certificates to our office until you apply for renewal of your certification.

Certificates must be kept current if you are actively working as a CAC or CSST. The grace period is only for those who are not actively working as an asbestos consultant or site surveillance technician.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS
Division of Occupational Safety and Health
Asbestos Unit
2424 Arden Way, Suite 495
Sacramento, CA 95825-2417
(916) 574-2993 Office (916) 483-0572 Fax
Jeff Ferrell
Senior Safety Engineer
Your certification is valid for a period of one year. If you wish to renew your certification, you must apply for renewal at least 60 days before the expiration date shown on your card. [8 CCR 341.15(h)(1)],
State of California
Division of Occupational Safety and Health
Certified Asbestos Consultant
Jeffrey Ronald Noel
Namefy 1 - * -
Certification ND. 00-2828
This certicalion was issued by the Division of
Occupational Sefety and Health as authorized

LEAD-BASED PAINT SURVEY

ZANINOVICH PROPERTY
7298 EAST MCKINLEY AVENUE

FRESNO, CALIFORNIA
Project No. 014-16208
December 28, 2016
Prepared for:

Jeff Harris
Wilson Homes
7550 North Palm Avenue, Suite 102
Fresno, California 93711
(559) 224-7550
Prepared by:

Krazan & Associates, Inc.
215 West Dakota Avenue
Clovis, California 93612
(559) 348-2200

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Project No. 014-16208
Page

1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 1

2.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF WORK ..................................................................................................... 1

3.0 BUILDING DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................................. 1

4.0 INVESTIGATIVE METHODS .............................................................................................................. 2

4.1 Sampling Protocols ............................................................................................................................. 2

4.2 Laboratory Analytical Methods .......................................................................................................... 2

5.0 RESULTS OF INVESTIGATION ......................................................................................................... 3

6.0 CONCLUSIONS ..................................................................................................................................... 3

7.0 LIMITATIONS ....................................................................................................................................... 4 Figures
Lead-Based Paint Survey Results (Table I) .............................................................................. following text Floor Plan with Sample Locations ...................................................................................... following Results Appendices
Analytical Results and Chain-of-Custody Record ....................................................................................... A DPH Certifications ........................................................................................................................................B

& A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING  ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING

LEAD-BASED PAINT SURVEY

ZANINOVICH PROPERTY
7298 EAST MCKINLEY AVENUE

FRESNO, CALIFORNIA

1.0 INTRODUCTION
This report presents the results of our lead-based paint survey for the structures located at 7298 E.

McKinley Ave. in Fresno, California. The lead-based paint survey was conducted under the conditions of Krazan & Associates, Inc.’s (Krazan’s) Proposal No. P16-365, dated December 8, 2016. Jeffrey Harris gave written authorization on December 9, 2016, for Krazan to proceed with the lead-based paint survey.

2.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF WORK
The purpose of the lead-based paint survey was to identify and quantify the presence of potential leadbased paints (LBPs) at the on-site structures. The scope of work for the limited LBP survey included conducting a visual survey of the structures, conducting bulk sampling and analysis of materials suspected to contain lead.

Krazan ou. aho
Project No. 014-16208
Page No. 2
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.

With Offices Serving the Western United States 1416208 LBP.doc Nanny House
The structure was a single-story wood-framed structure with concrete slab-on-grade foundation, stucco and wood exterior walls, with composite shingle over wood shingle roofing. Interior construction included gypsum board ceilings; gypsum board and stucco walls; and concrete floors overlain (in areas) by sheet flooring, wall-to-wall carpeting, and floor tiles. A small shed is located in front of the house of wood construction with composite shingle roof.

4.0 INVESTIGATIVE METHODS

4.1 Sampling Protocols
Eleven (11) samples of suspected LBPs were collected from the on-site structures. Representative samples were collected from painted surfaces that visually appeared to contain various types of paint.

Every attempt was made to identify unique paint and/or surface types. However, a chance exists that: 1) different paints are not visually distinct, 2) hidden surfaces exist, or 3) areas that were painted with different and distinct paint types are now covered by a single overlay. Sample locations for this survey were determined by the inspector and were selected in a random fashion after homogeneous areas were identified.

Sample locations for this survey were chosen in a semi-random fashion with emphasis placed on minimizing damage to the sampled materials. The samples were collected by carefully removing a small amount of the suspect material, with every attempt to separate the paint from the substrate. If possible, samples were collected from existing damaged areas or loose pieces of materials. Each sample was placed in a separate sealed plastic bag, and labeled with the project number and sample number.

4.2 Laboratory Analytical Methods
Paint chip samples were analyzed by Environmental Hazards Services of Richmond, Virginia, to detect the presence of total lead in accordance with EPA Method 7420. Copies of the analytical results and Chain-of-Custody Record are included in Appendix A.

Project No. 014-16208
Page No. 3
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.

With Offices Serving the Western United States 1416208 LBP.doc

5.0 RESULTS OF INVESTIGATION
As stated previously, 11 samples of suspected LBPs were collected from throughout the structures.

Analytical laboratory results and field observations of the materials sampled have been summarized on Table I, following the text of this report. Information presented within the table includes the sample number, the room equivalent, building component, substrate, testing location, lead content, the volume of LBP identified (typically expressed in square feet), and the condition of the material sampled. In addition, footnotes have been provided to convey pertinent information regarding the specific sample.

The following paints contained 0.5% or greater total lead by weight and are defined as lead-based paint:

None of the paints sampled contained 0.5% or greater total lead by weight.

The following paints contained greater than 0.009% total lead by weight and are defined as leadcontaining paint:

Main Residence
Gray wood door-frame – bedroom (Sample No. 2)
Gray plaster wall – hallway (Sample No. 3)
Green stucco wall – exterior (Sample No. 6)
Nanny House
Green wood door-frame – bathroom (Sample No. 8)
Green wood wall – exterior (Sample No. 11)
The paints on the exterior and interior of the main residence surveyed were generally in good condition.

The paints on the exterior and interior of the nanny house surveyed were generally in poor condition.

6.0 CONCLUSIONS
Occupational exposure to lead is regulated by both the Federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) (29 CFR 1926.62) and California OSHA (Title 8, GISO 5198 and CSO 1532.1).

Based on Federal and California OSHA, when disturbing paints which contain lead (any amount of detectable lead), the above-noted OSHA and California OSHA regulations should be followed.

Furthermore, the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) publication entitled "Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Housing," dated 1995, outlines specific guidelines for disrupting paint with lead in excess of 5,000 mg/kg (lead-based Project No. 014-16208
Page No. 4
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.

With Offices Serving the Western United States 1416208 LBP.doc paint). These guidelines have been developed primarily to address conditions within buildings utilized for residential purposes. In addition, industry accepted standards also suggest that building owners notify occupants regarding the presence, location, and extent of lead-based paints. Records of all notifications and reports must be maintained for the duration of ownership and must be transferred to successive owners.

All construction work where an employee may be occupationally exposed to lead containing paint, including building renovation and demolition, must comply with OSHA Regulation 29 CFR 1926.62 and California OSHA Title 8, CSO 1532.1. This regulation requires initial employee exposure monitoring to evaluate worker exposure during work that disturbs lead containing paint. Krazan suggests that engineering controls and air monitoring for airborne lead be conducted at the start of projects in which worker exposure to lead containing paint is likely.

Demolition of buildings containing lead-based paint is not specifically regulated by the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (APCD). General requirements for building demolition, however, such as dust control, must be strictly followed. Also, building components which have been identified as being coated with LBPs must be handled and disposed of as a Hazardous Waste and cannot be discarded as general construction debris.

7.0 LIMITATIONS
This survey and review of the subject property has been limited in scope. This investigation is undertaken with the calculated risk that the presence, full nature, and extent of lead-containing paints would not be revealed by visual observation and sampling alone. Krazan & Associates, Inc. makes no representation as to the lead content of paints not sampled or that were inaccessible to our inspector.

The findings of this report were based upon the results of our site inspection, paint chip sampling, along with the interpretation of paint chip analysis results. Lead-paint testing was done by a laboratory certified by the State of California Department of Public Health (DPH) and accredited as an AIHA Environmental Lead Laboratory Accreditation Program (ELLAP) laboratory. Therefore, the data are accurate only to the degree implied by review of the data obtained and by professional interpretation, and the degree of care of ensuring the testing accuracy and the representative nature of the samples obtained. The findings presented herewith are based on professional interpretation using state of the art methods and equipment Project No. 014-16208
Page No. 5
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.

With Offices Serving the Western United States 1416208 LBP.doc and a degree of conservatism deemed proper as of this report date. It is not warranted that such data cannot be superseded by future environmental or technical developments.

This lead-based paint survey is not intended to be the sole basis of lead paint removal bids. Confirmation of specific lead-based paint and volumes should be conducted by prospective removal contractors prior to accepting removal bids. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the client noted on the cover page and is subject to the terms and conditions in the applicable contract between the client and Krazan. The client is the only party to whom Krazan has explained the risks involved and has been involved in the shaping of the scope of services needed to satisfactorily manage those risks, if any, from the client’s point of view. Any third party use of this report, including use by Client’s lender, prospective purchaser, or lessee will be subject to the terms and conditions governing the contractual work in the contract between the client and Krazan. The unauthorized use of, release of, or reliance on the information contained in this report, without the expressed written consent of Krazan & Associates, Inc., is strictly prohibited and will be without risk or liability to Krazan.

If you have any questions or if we may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact our office at (559) 348-2200.

Respectfully submitted,
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Jeffrey R. Noël
DPH Certified Lead Inspector/Assessor
No. 7028
JRN/atd
2c: herewith
DD

TABLE I

LEAD-BASED PAINT SURVEY RESULTS
Zaninovich Property
7298 East McKinley Avenue
Fresno, California
December 20, 2016 Sampling
Lead content Volume Notes/
Sample No. Sample Location Structure Paint Sampled % by weight est. in sq. ft. Condition Additional locations 1 living room main residence plaster wall 0.0059 NC good gray 2 bedroom main residence wood door frame 0.061 NC good gray3 hall main residence plaster wall 0.032 NC good gray 4 exterior main residence wood siding <0.0050 NC good green5 exterior main residence wood trim <0.0047 NC good green 6 exterior main residence stucco wall 0.015 NC good green 7 living room nanny house gypsum board wall <0.0040 NC good green 8 bathroom nanny house wood door frame 0.087 NC good green 9 bedroom nanny house gypsum board wall 0.0055 NC good green 10 exterior nanny house stucco wall <0.0048 NC good tan 11 exterior nanny house wood wall 0.026 NC good green
NOTE: Lead-based paint is defined as paint containing 0.5% or greater lead by weight. NC = Not calculated Lead containing paint is defined as paint containing greater than 0.009% lead by weight.

Bold text items are considered Lead-based paint Italic text items are considered Lead-containing paint KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Serving the Western United States 1416208 Table I.xlsx
N
Scale: Date:

Drawn by:

J. R. N.

Project No.
014-16208
12 / 16
Approved by:

Figure No.

FLOOR PLAN WITH

PAINT SAMPLE LOCATIONS

ZANINOVICH PROPERTY
7298 EAST MCKINLEY AVENUE

FRESNO, CALIFORNIA
J.R.N
1 NOT TO SCALE

EXPLANATION

PAINT SAMPLE LOCATION
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 T l
△
△
7X
△
n
△
A
A
A
sslramam

ENGINEERS, GEOLOGISTS AND ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALISTS
Offices Serving the Western United States

Appendix A
Analysis Report
Client:

Project/Test Address:

Krazan & Associates Inc.
7469 Whitepine Rd
Telephone: 800.347.4010
Richmond, VA 23237
Environmental Hazards Services, L.L.C.
014-16208; Zaninovich Property; Fresno, CA
Client Number:
05-5650
Fax Number: Laboratory Results 559-348-2201
Analyzed Date:

Client Sample
Number
Lab Sample
Number
Pb (ug/g)
ppm
Lead Paint Chip
12/27/2016
12/21/2016
16-12-02916
Reported Date:

Received Date:

Report Number:
215 West Dakota Ave
Clovis, CA 93612
Narrative
ID
12/27/2016
Collection Location % Pb by
Wt.

Collection Date: 12/20/2016
16-12-02916-001 1 59 0.0059
16-12-02916-002 2 610 0.061
16-12-02916-003 3 320 0.032
16-12-02916-004 4 <50 <0.0050
16-12-02916-005 5 <47 <0.0047
16-12-02916-006 6 150 0.015
16-12-02916-007 7 <40 <0.0040
16-12-02916-008 8 870 0.087
16-12-02916-009 9 55 0.0055
16-12-02916-010 10 <48 <0.0048
16-12-02916-011 11 260 0.026

Page 2 ends

Fresno City CouncilAugust 14, 2025

Fresno City Council
August 14, 2025