Fresno City Council
August 14, 2025

EHS@ Laboratories'
Report Number:

Environmental Hazards Services, L.L.C
Project/Test Address:

Client Number: 16-12-02916
014-16208; Zaninovich Property; Fresno, CA
05-5650
Client Sample Collection Location
Number
Lab Sample
Number
% Pb by
Wt.

Narrative
ID
Pb (ug/g)
ppm
Missy Kanode
QA/QC Clerk
Analysis Method: EPA SW846 7000B
The HUD lead guidelines for lead paint chips are 0.50% by Weight, 5000 ppm, or 1.0 mg/cm². The Reporting Limit (RL) for samples prepared by ASTM E-1979-12 is 10.0 ug Total Pb. The RL for samples prepared by EPA SW846 3050B is 25.0 ug Total Pb. Paint chip area and results are calculated based on area measurements determined by the client. All internal quality control requirements associated with this batch were met, unless otherwise noted.

LEGEND Pb= lead ug = microgram ppm = parts per million
ug/g = micrograms per gram Wt. = weight
Reviewed By Authorized Signatory:

Sample Narratives:

Preparation Method: ASTM E-1979-12
The condition of the samples analyzed was acceptable upon receipt per laboratory protocol unless otherwise noted on this report. Results represent the analysis of samples submitted by the client. Sample location, description, area, etc., was provided by the client. Results reported above in mg/cm3 are calculated based on area supplied by client. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written consent of the Environmental Hazards Service, L.L.C. California Certification #2319 NY ELAP #11714.

(Aoc Aon ode
LeadAsbestos
Sample
Number
Sample Date
& Time
Particulate:

Air Volume (L) Comments
OR Wipe
Area (ft
2 ) OR
Scrape Area (cm2
)
Total Nuisance (NIOSH 0500) •
Respirable (NIOSH 0600) •
Other Metals
(Specify is below)
12/20/2016
16-12-02916

IIIIIIIIIINHH
Results by 12/29/16 Please
es submitted meet ASTM E1792 requirements?Do wipe samp Yes l~~l Released By: Jeff Noel Signature: Date/Time: 12/20/16 1600 Received By: (rt Signature: Uooitt Date/Time: 13424 [lb LDN X X X
X
X
X
X
X X
X X
X

X X X X
X X

X X X X
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8 9
10 11
Due Date:
12/27/2016
(Tuesday)
EL
No I I
7730
FAX: (559) 348-2201
P.O. #:

Krazan & Associates, Inc.
215 West Dakota Avenue
Clovis, CA 93612
Company Name:

Address:

City, State, Zip:

EHS Client Account #:Phone #:
5-5650 D(559) 348-2200
Date:

Contact Name:

Sampler Name:

Project #:
12/20/2016
Jeff Noel
Jeff Noel
014-16208
Zaninovich Property
Fresno, CA
ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARD SERVICES, L.L.C.
7469 WHITE PINE ROAD - RICHMOND, VA 23237 PHONE (804) 275-4788 FAX (804) 275-4907

CHAIN OF CUSTODY FORM
Bulk ID by PLM
(PCM) Fiber Count
PLM Point Count
PLM Gravimetric
Paint (%)
Paint (PPM)
Paint (mg/cm
Wipe * (See Note)
2)
TEM AHERA (Air)
TEM Chatfield (Bulk
Air
Soil
TCLP (Pb)
Waste Water
TCLP RCRA 8
Welding Fume
Toxic Metal Profile
Appendix B
Jeffrey Noel ID#: 7028
01/04/2017
01/04/2017
01/04/2017
Mr. Jeffrey R. Noel
Krazan & Associates, Inc.
215 W. Dakota Ave
Clovis, California 93612
State of California Department of Public Health
Lead -Related Cerincate Expiration
Construction Type
Certificate
Inspector/Assessor
Supervisor
Project Designer
Appendix
URS
June 29,2015

SECOND FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT
T H Agriculture & Nutrition Site
7183 East McKinley Avenue
Fresno County, California
URS Corporation - Fresno, California
Job No. 18715323
URS
June 29. 2015
Re:

Dear Ms. Barker:

Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments. i
Jtat A Cai

2. A 20 R20
*
Stuart B. St. Clair, PE ?r
Project Civil Engineer CML r Of cAuFO%
Enclosure
K ProjctsTHAN Site-187152507 0 Deliverables 201355-Yr Rvw Rpt URS Corporation
1360 E Spruce Avenue Suite 101
Fresne, CA 93720
Tel: 559-448-8222
Fax: 559-5 48-82.33
Second Five-Year Review Report
T H Agriculture & Nutrition Site
7183 East McKinley Avenue
Fresno County, California
(URS Job No. 18715256)
As you authorized, the document is being concurrently submitted to the DTSC and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA).

Sincerely,
URS Corporation
As you requested, URS Corporation (URS) prepared the enclosed Second Five-Year Review Report for the above-referenced site. The report addresses comments on the draft report, dated 28 June 2013, that were provided by the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) in a letter dated 11 June 2015.

Ms. Shau-Luen Barker, Project Manager
Environmental Affairs DepartmentPhilips Electronics North America Corporation 15313 West 95
th Street
Lenexa, Kansas 66219
he
Distribution list:

Shau-Luen Barker, Philips Electronics NAC, Lenexa, KS (1 hardcopy, I CD) Danny Domingo, DTSC, Clovis, CA (2 hardcopies, I CD)
Cynthia Wetmore, USEPA, San Francisco, CA (1 hardcopy, I CD) URS Fresno File (e-file only)
SPROrEsso,, s‘8RAr,"o) JAA. 06
M2. *
No. C 60945 "
ExpiE/.,,

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section
TABLE OF CONTENTS 1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES-1

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1

2.0 SITE CHRONOLOGY 2

3.0 BACKGROUND

4.0 REMEDIAL ACTIONS

4.3 OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE, AND MONITORING

5.0 6.0 FIVE-YEAR REVIEW PROCESS

7.0 TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT
i
PMIAN 30-187152567,0De‘ycr.hkal2l13t5-YrRysRpiDralt Rr:UE-28 13Aw URS ..16 ..16
16 ..16 ..18
21 ..21
..22
14 1415

7.1 7.2

7.37.4 2323
.23
24 .24
4 4
4 .5
6 6
.8

3.13.23.3 3.43.53.6
..9-9
10 11

6.1 6.26.36.46.56.66.7
REMEDY SELECTION... .......

REMEDY IMPLEMENTATION
PROGRESS SINCE THE LAST FYR...............................................

5.1 PREVIOUS FYR PROTECTIVENESS STATEMENT AND ISSUES 5.2 WORK COMPLETED DURING THIS FYR PERIOD.. ..................

SITE PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS
GEOLOGY AND HYDROLOGY........

LAND AND RESOURCE USE............

SITE HISTORY....................................

INITIAL RESPONSE........................... BASIS FOR TAKING ACTION..........

ADMINISTRATIVE COMPONENTS
COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT....

DOCUMENT REVIEW.................... DATA REVIEW...................... .........

SITE INSPECTION.......................... INTERVIEWS..................................

INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS......

QUESTION A...........................................

QUESTIONS............. ...............................

QUESTION C...........................................

TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT SUMMARY

4.14.2 8.0 ISSUES 25

9.0 RECOMMENDATIONS AND FOLLOW-UP ACTIONS 26

10.0 PROTECTIVENESS STATEMENT 28

11.0 NEXT REVIEW 29

12.0 REFERENCES 30
TABLES

FIGURES

APPENDICES
ii
P/IAN Sn-21715756/9Del.erdhle201755-YrRr*Rpinklth " ldn URS 1 2
3 4
5 1
2 3
4 567
8 Final Remediation Goals for Groundwater
Groundwater Monitoring Program Summary
Monitoring Well Construction Summary
1998 - 2012 Groundwater Statistical Trend Analysis Results Summary Proposed Revised Groundwater Monitoring Program
Site Location MapOn-Site and Near-Site Well Location MapOff-Site Well Location MapB-Zone Potentiometric Surface, May 14,2012 C-Zone Potentiometric Surface, May 14, 2012
D-Zone Potentiometric Surface, May 14, 2012
Non-Regional COC Concentrations Detected in Groundwater, 2011 Non-Regional COC Concentrations Detected in Groundwater, 2012 Five-Year Review Summary Form
Selected Figures from Final RAP
Five-Year Review Public Notice DocumentTable of Historical COC Detections in Groundwater Samples (on CD) Statistical Trend Analysis Results
Five-Year Review Site Inspection Checklist and Photographs Interview Documentation Form and RecordDeed Restriction A
B
C
D
E
F G
H

LIST OF ACRONYMS

ARARBHC
CERCLA
COCsDDD
DDE
DDT
DHS

DTSCFCORFSR
K/J
MCL
MNA
Notice of Intent to Delete
RAP
RISR
SARA
THAN
URS
USEPA
iii
FSTIIAi 3.1371525670 Dellver hLsW20l"$5-Yr R: * Apirali Rpt06-Y 11.* . URS NOID

NPLOM&M
National Priorities ListOperation. Maintenance and Monitoring PlanFinal Remedial Action Plan Remedial Investigation Summary Report
Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization ActT.H. Agriculture and Nutrition. LLCURS Corporation United Stales Environmental Protection Agency
Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirement
benzene hexachloride isomers
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act chemicals of concerndichlorodiphenyldichloroethane dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene
dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane
California Department of Health Services
Department of Toxic Substances ControlFinal Close-Out Report Feasibility Study Report
Kennedy/Jenks Consultants
Maximum Contaminant Level for public drinking water systems Monitored Natural Attenuation

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
ES-1
P TKAN SiRUS 1525617,0 Deliserabies(21/15-YrRYWRpMDnlRr ( 3b-44@x URS The Soil Component of the Final Remedy includes a containment cover, fencing, and a Deed Restriction, all of which combine to restrict potential contact by human or ecological receptors with residual chemicals of concern (COCs) in soil at the Site. The containment cover also restricts potential migration of residual COCs from on-site soils to other media (groundwater, surface water, and air). The Groundwater Component of the Final Remedy includes Monitored Natural Attenuation (MNA) of COCs in groundwater to ensure that concentrations remain within the Final Remediation Goals (FRGs). There were no exceedance of FRGs in the groundwater samples collected from monitoring or domestic wells during the FYR period of 2008 through 2012, nor were there any trends to indicate a likelihood of future FRG exceedances in any of the wells.

Based on the second FYR activities documented herein, it appears that the Final Remedy for the Site is functioning as intended and remains protective of human health and the environment.

Construction of the Soil Component of the Final Remedy was completed in 2003. The first FYR was completed in 2008 and received final DTSC approval in October 2008. This document was prepared in support of the second FYR.

This Second Five-Year Review Report was prepared by URS Corporation (URS) for the 5-acre T H Agriculture & Nutrition, L.L.C. (THAN) Site, which is located at 7183 East McKinley Avenue, Fresno County, California (Figure 1). This report was prepared to support the Five-Year Review (FYR) conducted by the California Environmental Protection Agency. Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), which is the lead agency with regulatory oversight of the Site. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) is the support agency for the Site. DTSCs FYR was conducted pursuant to Section 121(c) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). This report was prepared to transmit information to DTSC and USEPA consistent with the FYR process. The ultimate responsibility for completing the FYR rests with DTSC and USEPA.

Recommendations are provided herein for addressing relatively minor maintenance and administrative issues, and also for optimizing and streamlining the ongoing groundwater monitoring program.

1.0 INTRODUCTION
1 E: Siesll IAN Site i r 1:2547 1 Drellveab*a20t3-5-Yr RvwRppt Q-25.15 doc URS This was the second F YR performed after implementation ofthe Final Remedy for the Site. The first FYR was initiated in 2007 and final reporting occurred in 2008 [K/J, 2008] The conclusion of DTSC and USEPA in 2008 was that the Final Remedy continued to be protective of human health and the environment and that chemical specific Final Remediation Goals (FRGs) had been attained in groundwater. This second FYR was conducted in accordance with the Second Five-Year Review Work Plan [URS, 2013a] and with the Comprehensive Five-Year Review Guidance [USEPA. 2001].

This Second Five-Year Review Report was prepared by URS Corporation (URS) for the 5-acre T H Agriculture & Nutrition, L.L.C. (THAN) Site, which is located at 7183 East McKinley Avenue, Fresno County, California (Figure 1). This report was prepared to support the Five-Year Review (FYR) conducted by the California Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), which is the lead agency with regulatory oversight of the Site. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) is the support agency for the Site.

DTSC’s FYR was conducted pursuant to Section 121(c) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). The completed FYR Summary Form is provided in Appendix A.

This report was prepared to transmit information to DTSC and USEPA consistent with the FYR process. The ultimate responsibility for completing the FYR rests with DTSC and USEPA.

FYRs are conducted for sites for which remedial actions were selected that resulted in hazardous substances remaining at the site above concentrations that allow for unlimited use and unrestricted exposure. The purpose of a FYR is to evaluate the implementation and performance of the remedy, and to assess whether the remedy has been, and will continue to be, protective of human health and the environment. The FYR report should document the methods, findings, and conclusions of the FYR. If issues requiring corrective action are identified, the FYR report should document recommendations to address them.

SECOND FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT
T.H. Agriculture & Nutrition Site
7183 East McKinley Avenue
Fresno County, California

2.0 SITE CHRONOLOGY
Year(s)
1981
1984
19851986
1988 - 1993
19891993
1996
1998
1999
20032005
20062007
2 PWIAN Sae 18‘15256.*ADeincrable:201.15-¥r Ro, RplDrall Eni (28- p shr. URS Investigation of the Site began in 1981. Since then, THAN has performed various investigative and remedial activities at and near the Site under the oversight of local, state, and federal regulatory agencies, including Fresno County, the California Department of Health Services (DHS), DTSC, the California Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), and USEPA. The following is a chronological summary of Site investigation and remediation:
1 --------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ + DTSC issued an Order requiring THAN to sample nearby domestic wells, provide alternate domestic water supplies, and prepare a remedial investigation/feasibility study (RI/FS) report.USEPA added the Site to the National Priorities List (NPL).

Two soil vapor extraction (SVE) systems operated at the Site to remove volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from the unsaturated zone.

More chemically-impacted soils were excavated and disposed of off-site at a permitted landfill facility. Also, various structures and plant features were demolished.THAN submitted the final Remedial Investigation Summary Report [K/J. 1993] and the final Feasibility Study Report [SEACOR, 1993].

THAN submitted the final Multi-Pathway Health Risk Assessment Report [ENVIRON, 1996]._________ '_____________________________________ THAN submitted the final Technical and Economic Feasibility Evaluation [K/J, 1998]._____________________________________THAN submitted the final Remedial Action Plan [K/J, 1999].

THAN completed construction of the Soil Component of the Final Remedy. The Soil Component includes a containment cover and an adjacent infiltration trench.The Operation, Maintenance, and Monitoring Plan [K/J, 2005] and the OM&M Agreement were finalized, and a Covenant and Agreement to Restrict Use of Property (Deed Restriction) was recorded.USEPA deleted the Site from the NPL.

THAN submitted the Evaluation of Site Compliance Status and Proposed Modifications in Groundwater Monitoring [K/J, 2007b].
____________________________ Activity___________________________ Agricultural chemicals were detected in groundwater samples collected by DHS from domestic wells near the Site. Operations ceased at the plant in the Autumn of 1981._______________________________________________________ Chemically-impacted soils were excavated and disposed of off-site at a permitted landfill facility. Also, various structures and plant features were demolished. 2008
2011
3 PTHAN See 1471 ’ 2567,0 Dell crahles20133 5-Y:R zu Rp ‘Draf. Rpl 0 1. I K URS THAN submitted the first Five-Year Review Report [K/J, 2008].THAN submitted the Evaluation of DBCP and TCP in Underlying Groundwater | K/J, 2011].

3.0 BACKGROUND
Background information regarding the Site and its history is provided below.

3.1 SITE PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS

3.2 GEOLOGY AND HYDROLOGY
4 P THAN $7e-1K7152567ilDehrsables201355-YrRY: RplDrliRpti6-28 Djia. URS During the Remedial Investigation (RI), over 200 soil borings were drilled in the Site vicinity to depths of up to 250 feet below ground surface (bgs). The lithology encountered consisted of heterogeneous mixtures of sand, silt, gravel, and occasional clay lenses [K/J, 1993].

2. The B-zone, consisting generally of silty sand and sand between approximate depths of 58 and 72 feet bgs in subunit BO, silty sand and sand between approximate depths of 70 and 102 feet bgs in subunit Bl, and silty sand and sand between approximate depths of 99 and 115 feet bgs in subunit B2.

The Site consists of an approximately 5-acre. vacant, fenced parcel located at 7183 East McKinley Avenue in Fresno County, just east of the city of Fresno, California. The Site is located in Section 35, Township 13 South, Range 21 East of the Mount Diablo Base and Meridian. The Fresno County Assessor’s Parcel Number is 310-062-09. The Site is bordered on all four sides by cropland. Lowdensity residential parcels are located approximately 150 feet south of the Site. Otherwise, no environmentally sensitive areas are near the Site.

The Site is within the eastern portion of the San Joaquin Valley, about 15 miles from the westernmost foothills of the Sierra Nevada mountains. The San Joaquin Valley is a geomorphic province consisting predominantly of alluvial fans and plains, lacustrine and marsh deposits, flood basin deposits, and sand dunes. The Fresno region of the San Joaquin Valley is underlain by a basement complex of metamorphic and igneous rocks. Consolidated marine and continental sedimentary rocks of Cretaceous and Tertiary age consisting mainly of sandstone, siltstone, and shale overlie the basement complex The most important water-bearing geologic unit for water supply is the older alluvium, which consists of layers and lenses of variable-sized sediments. The Site overlies Quaternary older alluvium.
1 The A-zone, consisting generally of clayey gravels and sands between approximate depths of 15 and 45 feet bgs. The A-zone became dry in 1987 and has remained dry with rare exception due to generally declining groundwater elevations in the area.

The RI identified four lithologic units of sand and gravel representing the most significant waterbearing zones in the uppermost 250 feet of alluvium. These four units are identified in order of increasing depth as the A-, B-, C-, and D-zones. Semi-confined permeable subunits within each water-bearing zone are designated with numbers increasing with depth in a given zone (i.e., BO. B l, B2, CO, and Cl). The zones and subunits are not continuous, and are separated from one another by less permeable sediments. The four most significant water-bearing zones are:

3.3 LAND AND RESOURCE USE
5 PTLAit Eate-1171525617 4 Deliverables201. 5-Yr RYWRp’Dral F« iX-28-1 * Joe URS There are currently no water supply wells on the Site or on THAN’s adjacent 20-acre orchard parcel.

Irrigation water for landscaping vegetation along the northern edge of the Site, and for orchard trees, in addition to the Site, THAN currently owns an adjacent 20-acre orchard parcel that borders on the south, east, and west sides of the Site, North of the Site, across East McKinley Avenue, is cropland not owned by THAN. Other nearby properties consist of cropland and low-density residential parcels. The nearest low-density residential parcels are approximately 150 feet south of the Site.

3. The C-zone, consisting generally of silty sand and sand between approximate depths of 116 and 144 feet bgs in subunit CO, and silty sand, sand, and gravel between approximate depths of 140 and 184 feet bgs in subunit CI.

There are no natural surface water bodies, such as lakes or streams, near the Site, nor are there any nearby man-made ponds. Several irrigation canals traverse the nearby area.

The Site and surrounding land are outside the city limits of the City of Fresno, but are within the City’s Sphere of Influence. The area is designated as the City's major new growth community in the 2025 City of Fresno General Plan. The City is in the process of preparing its 2035 General Plan. The tentative 2035 land use planning map posted on the City’s website as of May 2013 shows the area surrounding the Site as planned for residential development. As new properties are incorporated into the City, it is anticipated that City water service will be extended to those properties.

On-site and near-site groundwater monitoring well locations are shown on Figure 2. Off-site groundwater monitoring well locations are shown on Figure 3. The water-bearing zones (B-, C-, and D-zones) appear to be in hydraulic communication, with preferential horizontal flow paths dominating groundwater movement. The groundwater flow direction is generally toward the southwest in all three water-bearing zones. For reference, interpreted potentiometric-surface contour maps for the B-, C-, and D-zones on May 14,2012 are presented as Figures 4,5, and 6, respectively.

No significant vertical gradients between tine three zones have been observed, indicating that they are hydrologically interconnected.

There are no current plans to develop the Site. At some future time, it is possible that the Site would be developed for commercial or industrial activity. The Deed Restriction recorded in 2005 prohibits the use of the Site as a residence, hospital, school, day-care center for children, or any other purpose involving residential occupancy on a 24-hour basis.

The Site is the former location of an agricultural chemical formulation, packaging, and warehousing plant. THAN and prior owners of the Site, including the Geigy Company, Inc (now Syngenta, Inc.) and Olin Mathieson Chemical Corporation (now Olin Corporation) formulated agricultural chemicals at the Site. From 1959 until the present, the Site has been owned or operated by THAN, which discontinued operations at the Site in 1981

4. The D-zone. consisting generally of silty sand, sand, and gravel between approximate depths of 172 and 232 feet bgs.

3.4 SITE HISTORY
included: organochlorine pesticides such as dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT),

3.5 INITIAL RESPONSE

3.5.1 Soil Excavation
6 FITHAN Snc-(K71525670Dancable115-YrRes Rpirali Kpi 18-134 URS Two phases of soil excavation were conducted at the Site. In 1984, approximately 14,000 cubic yards of impacted soil and debris were removed from the former landfill area that was historically Little is known about the physical plant or operations on-site prior to 1950. Between 1950 and 1981, the Site was utilized by several owners for the formulation. packaging, and warehousing of agricultural chemicals, or pesticides. Chemicals handled at the Site included agricultural chemicals, various raw materials used in agricultural chemical formulation, quality assurance laboratory chemicals, and solvents. In addition, certain chemical were consigned or purchased and warehoused at the Site solely for resale. Pesticides handled at the Site and detected in soil and/or groundwater The Site was investigated and feasibility studies were performed, in accordance with the Determination of Imminent and Substantial Endangerment and Remedial Action Order Docket No. HSA 86/87-020 ED (Order) issued by the California Department of Health Services (DHS ), a predecessor agency to DTSC, dated January 23. 1987 and amended on May 8, 1987 and January 5, 1991 [DTSC, 1991 J. Several phases of on-site soil investigation and on- and off-site groundwater investigation were performed in the 1980s and early 1990s. These activities were described in detail in various documents including the Remedial Investigation Summary Report (RISR) [K/J, 1993] and the Feasibility Study Report (FSR) [SEACOR, 1993].

In 1981, agricultural chemicals were detected in groundwater samples collected by DHS from nearby domestic wells. DHS, RWQCB, and Fresno County requested further investigation by THAN. Operations ceased at the plant in approximately Autumn of 1981. The Site was added to the NPL on June 10, 1986.

Interim remedial actions performed for the Site included soil excavation, demolition of on-site structures, soil vapor extraction (SVE), and provision of alternate potable-water supplies to nearby residents. These activities are discussed in subsections below. Selected figures from the Final RAP are provided in Appendix B to show the on-site areas involved in these activities. is obtained from the City’s potable-water system. Current and potential beneficial uses of groundwater in the area of the Site include municipal, domestic, agricultural, and domestic [RWQCB, 2004]. Most of the parcels downgradient (southwest) of the Site are now connected to the City's potable-water supply system, although some of these parcels still also maintain domestic water wells.
dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene (DDE), dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane (DDD), toxaphene, chlordane, benzene hexachloride isomers (BHC), and dieldrin; organophosphates such as diphenamid, malathion, trifluralin, and guthion; and chlorophenoxy herbicides and miscellaneous pesticides.

3.5.2 Demolition of Structures

3.5.3 Soil Vapor Extraction

3.5.3 Alternate Water Supplies
7 F ‘THAN Slle- 1M71*25F0 Delisprahte«(20136-Yitvw RpDrall Rpt 06-24-13 URS in 1985, THAN began providing bottled water or household carbon adsorption systems to residents downgradient (southwest) of the Site. From 1988 to 1990, THAN funded an extension of the City’s potable water distribution system eastward to Temperance Avenue. Households downgradient of the Site were offered connection to the City's potable water distribution system at THAN’s expense. At the time of this second FYR, City water is now available in essentially the entire area downgradient of the Site, with the exception of parcels on East Pine Avenue, within approximately 600 feet south Before construction of the Soil Component of the Final Remedy commenced in 2002, the SVE systems were dismantled, and the SVE wells were destroyed by overdrilling and sealing with cement-bentonite grout.

In conjunction with the 1984 soil excavation in the former landfill area, the nearby concrete sump, tank. and concrete pad in the solvent storage area, the metal frame shed, and chemical storage tanks were demolished and disposed of off-site at a permitted landfill facility.

In conjunction with the 1989 soil excavation, five structures were demolished at the Site. including the two-story brick building and the one-story wood-frame building that housed the laboratory. In addition, an aboveground storage tank and a concrete slab were also demolished. Demolition waste materials were disposed of off-site at a permitted landfill facility. used for on-site disposal of wastes. Also, the laboratory cisterns (former Drainage System A) and surrounding impacted soils were excavated.

In 1989. approximately 10,000 cubic yards of impacted soil were excavated in the former solvent storage area, the former railroad loading dock area, several known drainage systems. and in the area of former chemical storage tanks.

Two SVE systems were installed at the Site. One SVE system was installed in 1988 to evaluate the feasibility of removing chloroform and other volatile or semi-volatile organic compounds from unsaturated-zone soils in the former laboratory area. Another SVE system was installed in 1990 to evaluate the feasibility of removing xylenes and ethylbenzene from unsaturated-zone soils in the former solvent storage area. Through system shutdown in 1993. an estimated 11,700 pounds of xylenes and ethylbenzene, and an estimated 15,800 pounds of total non-methane hydrocarbons were removed by the SVE system.

In 1992, an underground storage tank (UST) for boiler fuel oil was identified southeast of the pump house. The UST was removed in 1992 and disposed of off-site.In both phases of excavation, the soil and debris were transported and disposed of off-site at a permitted landfill facility.

3.6 BASIS FOR TAKING ACTION
The primary chemicals of concern (COCs) identified in on-site soil comprised:
• organochlorine pesticides (DDT, DDD, DDE. dieldrin, and lindane); volatile organic compounds (chloroform, xylenes, and ethylbenzene); and « the nematicide l,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP).
© the organochlorine pesticide dieldrin;
• the nematocide DBCP; and
• the agricultural-chemical impurity 1,2,3-trichloropropane (1.2,3-TCP).

The presence of the above COCs provided the basis for taking action. 8 # IFILAN Sae-IN? 1525607 <1 Delrrahle-21 s YrRwe RpDrall Rol (-2411ake, URS The primary COCs identified in on- and off-site groundwater, potentially a source of potable water, comprised:

Regarding the groundwater COCs DBCP and 1,2,3 -TCP, both of them have been widely detected in eastern Fresno County groundwater, including upgradient and crossgradient from the Site, and they are considered to be regional groundwater contaminants resulting from past agricultural practices.

More information on the regional nature of these two COCs is provided in Section 5.0. of the Site. There are currently three residential properties on East Pine Avenue, which were provided with household carbon adsorption systems by THAN. The residents are responsible for operation and maintenance of the carbon adsorption systems. • volatile organic compounds (carbon tetrachloride, chloroform, and 1,2-dichloroethane 11,2- DCA]);

4.0 REMEDIAL ACTIONS
REMEDY SELECTION4.1
For the Soil Component, the key performance objective was:

For the Groundwater Component, the key performance objectives were:
• Comply with Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements (ARARs);© 9 Require extracted groundwater to be put to beneficial use to the extent practicable; 9 PWTHANSi=-W£71525E/.DD.Ltet:alen20135 Yi RnDrafRp06 28- 13.0M URS In 1997. DTSC agreed that THAN could perform a technical and economic feasibility evaluation (TEFE). The TEFE concluded that active groundwater remediation would have little associated benefit compared with natural attenuation and would not be cost effective, especially since alternate water supplies had been provided to affected parcels [K/J, 1998]. Based on the TEFE, DTSC agreed • Establish a non-numeric preliminary remedial goal for DBCP in groundwater due to its regional presence, which would require an evaluation of DBCP at the time that final groundwater remediation goals are attained for other chemicals associated with the Site; and Remedy selection, implementation, and operations and maintenance (O&M) are discussed in separate sections below.
• Develop and implement a groundwater monitoring program capable of: (1) verifying that unacceptable human exposures or environmental impacts are not occurring as a result of the presence or movement of chemicals in groundwater, and (2) providing sufficient information to allow for analysis of the effectiveness of the groundwater remediation system; Develop and implement a groundwater extraction and treatment system capable of achieving permanent containment, or removal of, chemicals released on or from the Site, which exceed Final Remediation Goals (FRGs); In a letter to THAN dated 6 August 1993, DTSC identified “key performance objectives” that would need to be met for the Soil and Groundwater Components of the Final Remedy. These key performance objectives are summarized below. • Establish provisions to deal with any significant release of DBCP, should it occur, from Site soils to groundwater resulting from a re-saturation of the A-zone. • Reduce the toxicity, volume, and mobility of chemicals present in on-site soils to the extent practical in order to: (1) eliminate existing or potential human exposures which pose a total cancer nsk from all exposure routes of greater than 1x106 or a total hazard index greater than one for non-carcinogenic risks, and (2) control the migration of chemicals from Site soils to other media.

Remediation Goals (FRGs). which are provided in Table 1. The

4.2 REMEDY IMPLEMENTATION
10 FTHAN Site 18/15265." Dliverahtcs00t15 irRt RpMDrall Rpl 4M,28 aade URS The Final Remedy for the Site is described in the final Remedial Action Plan (RAP) [K/J, 1999]. which was prepared pursuant to the Order and California Health and Safety Code Section 25356.1.The Final Remedy includes a soil component, a groundwater component, and engineering/administrative/institutional controls. The soil component includes: (a) a containment cover consisting of a bentonite clay liner, a rodent-control barrier, clean fill soil, and a vegetative top layer; (b) an infiltration trench adjacent to the southern and western sides of the containment cover for collection and infiltration of surface stormwater runoff: (c) perimeter fencing and signage; and (d) a deed restriction on the Site. The groundwater component includes monitored natural attenuation (MNA) of COCs and contingency plans in case COC concentrations exceed Final A Covenant & Agreement to Restrict Use of Property for the T.H. Agriculture & Nutrition Site (Deed Restriction) [DTSC. 2005a] was recorded on September 26,2005 for the Site to ensure that future land use activities will not adversely affect the integrity and/or effectiveness of the Soil Component of the Final Remedy or result in exposures to the public and the environment of COCs at the Site.

A Final Close-Out Report (FCOR), documenting that all response actions for the Site were completed in accordance with the Close-Out Procedures for National Priorities List (NPL) Sites (OSWER Directive 9320.0-09A-P), was published by USEPA on September 29, 2005 [USEPA, 2005]. A Notice of Intent to Delete the T.H. Agriculture & Nutrition Site from the National PrioritiesList (NOID) was published in the Federal Register, Vol. 71, No. 132, dated July 11, 2006 with a request for public comment [USEPA, 2006a]. The Site was deleted from the NPL as announced in the Federal Register, Vol. 71, No. 161, dated August 21. 2006 [USEPA, 2006b]. engineering/administrative/institutional controls of the Final Remedy include: (a) providing alternate water supplies to affected parties. (b) providing financial assurances to ensure long-term maintenance and operation of the Final Remedy, and (c) conducting reviews every five years to assess whether the Final Remedy remains effective in protecting human health and the environment.

Implementation of the Soil Component of the Final Remedy was completed at the Site on January 24,2003 in compliance with the Design Specifications and Drawings as approved by DTSC [ K/J, 2002]. A Documentation Report for Implementation of the Soil Component of the Final Remedy was submitted to DTSC to summarize activities conducted during implementation of the soil component at the Site [K/J, 2003], and a Final Remedial Action Completion Report was submitted to DTSC on September 28,2004 [K/J, 2004].
that the proposed groundwater extraction and treatment component of the remedy could be replaced with Monitored Natural Attenuation (MNA) along with a contingency plan for action (e.g., groundwater extraction and/or treatment) if COCs are detected in groundwater at concentrations exceeding FRGs. 43 OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE, AND MONITORING

43.1 Inspections

43.2 Maintenance
Maintenance requirements for the Final Remedy are minimal and include the following:
• Repairing damage to fences and signage, as needed; and • Repairing damage to wellheads of monitoring wells, as needed. 11 PYTIAr Sie ih H 523677« Deliter thle 420135-Yr Rvw RpDrat Km US-28-I to URS If any significant repairs to the Site are needed, DTSC requires that THAN provide 60 calendar days’ advance written notice. If any emergency or upset event occurs, DTSC requires that THAN submit a The Soil and Groundwater Components of the Final Remedy are operated, monitored, and maintained in accordance with the Operation, Maintenance, and Monitoring (OM&M) Plan [K/J, 2005] and the OM&M Agreement that was adopted on September 29, 2005 [DTSC, 2005b], • Regrading the perimeter of the upper layer of the containment cover (using top soil derived from the adjacent orchard, if necessary) to correct minor instances of surface erosion, as needed;
Ongoing inspections of the Soil Component and groundwater monitoring wells are performed to evaluate the integrity, permanence, and effectiveness of the Final Remedy. These inspections are performed on a semi-annual basis, as approved by DTSC. Inspection requirements are described in the OM&M Plan and include observations of the containment cover, vegetation, fences, signage, infiltration trench, monitoring wells, and general Site conditions. Areas of erosion, ponding, burrowing, or other threats to the cover are to be noted.

In addition to the semi-annual inspections, a local contractor visits the Site on a bi-weekly basis to observe general Site conditions and report to URS. The contractor looks for trash dumping, fence damage, other types of vandalism, containment cover damage, excess vegetation, water ponding, or other signs of problems. • Filling rodent burrows in the upper layer of the containment cover. and under the fence, with top soil derived from the adjacent orchard; as needed;
• Mowing the vegetative layer on top of the containment cover annually in the S pring to reduce fire danger as required by the local fire protection agency; • Placing rodent bait poison periodically in on-site and near-site bait stations to control rodents that may damage the containment cover;
• Removing trash that is dumped on-site (generally outside the fence) or that blows on-site, as needed;

4.3.3 Monitoring

43.4 Reporting
12 P THAN Site-1a?1$25617.01 Deliver les\201315-YrItvw RplDral RmOa I* llAK URS The current GMP. as set forth in the Supplemental Groundwater Report, includes 28 on-site, nearsite, and off-site groundwater monitoring wells, completed in the A, B, C, or D hydrogeologic zones, and 13 domestic wells. A summary of the GMP is provided in Table 2. Monitoring-well construction details are provided in Table 3. Only rarely since 1987 have A-zone monitoring wells yielded sufficient water to be sampled. The GMP includes six “Resaturation Response” monitoring wells that are scheduled for sampling only if the A-zone resaturates, and three “Exceedance Response” monitoring wells that are scheduled for sampling only if a COC concentration in onsite/near-site monitoring well clusters 150, 151, or 155 exceeds the respective FRG. The “Exceedance Response” wells formerly included near-site irrigation well 905. However, the casing in that well collapsed in early 2009, and the pump was removed and the well decommissioned and sealed to the satisfaction of Fresno County inspectors. written report within seven working days. To date, no significant repairs have been needed, and no emergency or upset event has occurred.

On September 14, 2007, an Evaluation of Site Compliance Status and Proposed Modifications in Groundwater Monitoring (Supplemental Groundwater Report) was submitted for DTSC’s review and approval [K/J, 2007b]. The Supplemental Groundwater Report evaluated existing groundwater conditions and proposed modifications in groundwater monitoring on, near, and off the Site.

Additionally, the report provided an evaluation of the compliance of on-site and off-site groundwater quality with the FRGs set forth in the RAP and the appropriateness of discontinuing monitoring of natural attenuation parameters. At a meeting on October 14,2008, DTSC communicated that DTSC did not have any objections to the groundwater monitoring program (GMP) modifications proposed in the Supplemental Groundwater Report and that DTSC would transmit a letter providing approval of the GMP modifications. As of the writing of this report, written review comments or approval of GMP modifications have not been received from DTSC or USEPA in response to the submitted Supplemental Groundwater Report. Each year since 2009, DTSC has granted verbal approval to proceed with groundwater monitoring as proposed in the Supplemental Groundwater Report, and the groundwater monitoring in 2009 through 2013 was conducted in accordance with the Supplemental Groundwater Report.

By April 1 of each year, THAN submits an annual monitoring report to DTSC that includes monitoring results for the previous calendar year. If any “unusual or inconsistent” groundwater monitoring results are obtained, they are reported to DTSC within 30 working days after receipt of the analytical results. The analytical results for domestic well samples are provided to each domestic well owner, along with a table summarizing the COCs detected in that well and the regulatory limit for each COC, within 30 working days after receipt of the analytical results.

4.3.5 Costs
20092010 $116,0002011 $60,000
2012 $53,000
13 KTmjed THANSile 1$71523617.0Deliverabtg136-\rRyw KpiRrtt6-29-l5. URS \
The annual OM&M costs were originally estimated in 2004 at approximately $145,000. By comparison, it is seen that the actual annual OM&M costs for 2008 through 2012 were less than the 2004 estimate, even without adjusting for inflation or the time value of money. This accords with the observation that no substantial OM&M issues were encountered during that time period.

An updated 30-year estimate of probable costs, totaling $1,813,996 in year 2014 dollars, was submitted for DTSC review on August 6,2014. DTSC’s concurrence was provided in a letter dated March 4,2015. THAN is in the process of providing a financial assurance mechanism document to DTSC based on this updated 30-year estimate of probable costs.

OM&M costs are incurred for inspecting and maintaining the Soil Component, groundwater monitoring, reporting, and maintaining a letter of credit for financial assurance. Approximate actual OM&M costs for 2008 through 2012 are as follows:

Calendar Year
2008
Approximate Total Actual
OM&M Cost
$99,000
$107,000

5.0 PROGRESS SINCE THE LAST FYR
This section summarizes the findings of the first FYR, and reviews progress since then.

5.1 PREVIOUS FYR PROTECTIVENESS STATEMENT AND ISSUES
Issue Date of Action
THAN Periodic
Regrade berms THAN Periodic
THAN
Replace locks THAN Locks replaced 2009
THAN 2009
Outdated signs THAN Signs replaced 2009
14 PlIAM Sir>18715254N2.0Delivetab.2013V5-YrP: * RplDrallSpit-2d-1laki URS Minor berm
erosion
Regrade ground to
eliminate space
below fence
Animal burrowing
at few locations
Replace with
updated signs
Regrading performed
and space eliminated
Berms regraded
using additional top
soil, as necessary
Upon further review,
no action deemed
necessary as yet;
infiltration trench
still operating
adequately
Minor soil/silt
accumulation in
stormwater
infiltration trench
The first FYR report identified six minor issues and provided recommendations for follow-up actions to address the issues. Each recommendation and the current status are discussed in the table below:

DTSC staff concurred with the protectiveness statement in the first FYR report and that chemicalspecific FRGs had been attained in groundwater.

The first FYR was initiated in 2007 and final reporting occurred in 2008 [K/J, 2008J. Below is the protectiveness statement from the first FYR report:
“The Final Remedy for the Site is functioning as intended and remains protective of human health and the environment." Remove soil and
rock from
infiltration trench,
wash rock, and
replace rock
Party
Responsible
Action Taken and
Outcome
Missing locks on
monitoring well
covers
Small space
between security
fence and ground
at few locations
Holes filled with lop
soil, as found; poison
bait placed to kill
rodents
Recommendation
Repair current
holes, perform
ongoing O&M to
minimize
burrowing; monitor
in future

5.2 WORK COMPLETED DURING THIS FYR PERIOD
© mapping of estimated DBCP usage in east-central Fresno County; comparison of analytical results for Site’s wells to reported regional concentrations; comparison of analytical results for upgradient and downgradient wells, 0 15
P llAN Site I#715256)70) DeliVerbies/2013U-Yr RYw RplDrah Rp (X28-1.3 ak. URS In its comments on the first FYR report, USEPA recommended that an evaluation of the regional contaminants DBCP and 1,2,3-TCP be performed as described in the Final RAP In response, THAN submitted the Evaluation of DBCP and TCP in Underlying Groundwater [K/J, 2011]. The report provided several converging lines of evidence to support the conclusion that DBCP and 1,2,3- TCP are regional groundwater contaminants, and that detections of these chemicals in domestic-well groundwater samples near the Site are most likely primarily attributable to past non-point source applications on agricultural cropland in the region, and not to releases at the Site. The report was based upon groundwater data collected through the year 2010. The lines of evidence supporting the conclusion included:

Work completed during this FYR period (2008 through 2012) included addressing minor issues identified during the first FYR, as discussed in Section 5 1, and ongoing OM&M activities, as discussed in Section 4.3. Additional work completed is discussed below. spatial distribution of DBCP and 1.2,3-TCP detections as compared to the predominant groundwater flow direction from the Site; and the estimated mass reduction of DBCP and 1,2,3-TCP in groundwater due to natural attenuation.

After the above report was submitted, additional groundwater data was collected in 2011 and 2012 [URS, 2012 & 2013]. The DBCP and 1,2,3-TCP concentrations detected in ground water monitoring and domestic wells is 2011 and 2012 were very similar to the data through 2010 on which the report’s conclusions were based Therefore. URS concurs with the report’s conclusions that additional remediation and/or establishment of chemical-specific FRGs for DBCP and 1,2,3-TCP are not warranted.

6.0 FIVE-YEAR REVIEW PROCESS
The methods used to complete the second FYR are discussed in the seven subsections below.

ADMINISTRATIVE COMPONENTS6.1
6©• FYR report development and review.

6.2 COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT

6.3 DOCUMENT REVIEWRelevant documents reviewed for the FYR are listed in Section 12.0 and are discussed below. 16 r THAN si :1*7 r 1561ft Dcliycrablc20135.r R:w RpMDr 1 Rpi 116-28-13 u URS A draft Work Plan was submitted in December 2012. and DTSC provided comments in a letter dated 17 January 2013. The final Work Plan was submitted in February 2013 [URS. 2013a). The Work Plan included procedures and a schedule for the following:

Community notification:Document review;Data collection and review; Site inspection;
Local interviews; and
On March 18,2013, DTSC published a public notice in the dominant local newspaper (Fresno Bee) announcing the commencement of the FYR process for the Site, providing Danny Domingo’s contact information, and inviting community participation. The public notice is provided in Appendix C. Zero people contacted Mr Domingo as a result of this advertisement.

DTSC initiated the second FYR in November 2012 with a letter to THAN requesting that a FYR Work Plan be prepared and submitted. The DTSC review team was led by Danny Domingo, PG, in the Clovis office. Other members of the team included Cynthia Wetmore, Superfund Remedial Manager, of USEPA Region 9; Shau-Luen Barker of Project Realty, LLC, representing THAN; and Stuart St. Clair, PE, of URS, who has been designated as the Project Engineer by THAN.

This FYR report will be made available to the public, once it has been finalized, by placing a copy in the designated public document repository: Fresno County Library, Sunnyside Branch, 5566 East Kings Canyon Road, Fresno, California. Upon completion of the FYR, DTSC will publish a public notice in the Fresno Bee to announce the availability of the final FYR report in the public document repository.

6.3.1 ARARs Review
COC
Dieldrin
Chloroform 100 80-

0.5 0.51,2-DCA
Carbon Tetrachloride 0.50.5 No

6.3.2 Human Health Risk Assessment Review
17 F THANSiir I#71:25n,7.1Dchverbles2013‘s Y.Rve RpDrali Rpl 06-2-13 de URS Other than the potential vapor-intrusion pathway, which is discussed in greater length below, this second FYR did not identify any exposure scenarios, pathways, or receptors that were not sufficiently addressed by the original HRA. Of the four COCs with established groundwater FRGs (i.e., dieldrin, chloroform, 1,2-DCA, and carbon tetrachloride), the FRGs for chloroform, 1.2-DCA, and carbon tetrachloride were based upon ARARs, as discussed in Section 6.3.1, and not upon the HRA results. Only the FRG for dieldrin was based upon the HRA results. Review of the Toxicity Criteria Database maintained by California’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment Chemical-specific ARARs identified in the 1999 Final RAP for COCs strictly associated with the Site in groundwater are listed below, along with current ARARs:

Regarding non-chemical-specific ARARs, the California water well standards, published in Department of Water Resources (DWR) Bulletin 74-81 under California Water Code Section 231, require that any well that has not been used for one year must be properly destroyed unless the owner demonstrates the intention to use the well again As discussed in Section 6.5, there is an on-site water supply well that has not been used for over one year. THAN does not intend to use the well in the future, so it should be properly destroyed.

The multi-pathway health risk assessment (HRA) completed in 1996 evaluated cancer risks and noncancer hazards for several exposure scenarios including on- and off-site workers, off-site residents, and on-site trespassers [ENVIRON, 1996]. Exposure pathways considered included exposure to onsite soil via ingestion, dermal contact, and inhalation of vapors and particulates, and exposure to groundwater via ingestion, bathing, and swimming. DBCP and dieldrin were the primary risk drivers for groundwater exposures.

Otherwise, no revisions to laws or regulations were identified that affect the protectiveness of the remedy.

More stringent
No
ARAR Changed?
No
1999 RAP ARAR1
(ug/L)
None
Current ARAR1
(ug/L)
None
Notes:
1 The more stringent of the federal MCL or the California MCL. 2 The federal MCL of 80 ug/L is for total trihalomethanes, which include chloroform, bromoform, bromodichloromethane, and dibromochloromethane.

6.3.3 Ecological Risk Assessment Review

6.4 DATA REVIEW

6.4.1 Inspection Records

6.4.2 Groundwater Monitoring Data
18 l’AI HAN Site. 187 15254.7 Delsverahi - 1201 50-1 t E w RaDr al Rp 3-2a- l jd URS (OEHHA) and of USEPA’s Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) indicates that there have been no changes to the dieldrin toxicity values in the years after 1996 when the HR A was completed.The HRA did not address the possibility of future vapor intrusion of volatile COCs to buildings that may be constructed at or near the Site [ENVIRON. 1996]. There are currently no buildings at, or adjacent to, the Site. At the present time, THAN has no plans for future construction of buildings at, or adjacent to, the Site. Therefore, vapor-intrusion concerns appear unwarranted at this time.

The monitoring data collected from 2008 through 2012 was reviewed for this FYR, including the semi-annual inspection records for the soil and groundwater components of the Final Remedy, and the groundwater monitoring data (water-level data and analytical results for groundwater samples collected from monitoring and domestic wells). Results of the data review are summarized in the subsections below.

Review of the semi-annual inspection records for the Soil Component of the Final Remedy for 2008 through 2012 indicates that no major O&M issues were encountered. Minor issues such as shallow rodent burrows, minor erosion at the edges of the containment cover, and minor vandalism were encountered and addressed, as necessary. Similarly, review of the inspection records for the Ground water Component of the Final Remedy for 2008 through 2012 indicates that no major O&M issues were encountered. Minor issues, such as missing locks and a wellhead damaged by a wayward vehicle, were encountered and addressed, as necessary.

The original ecological risk assessment concluded that potential effects of Site chemicals to on-site and off-site ecological habitats are expected to be negligible [K/J, 1999]. The containment cover, including a rodent-control barrier, limits exposure of ecological receptors to COCs in soil. There are no active water wells on, or adjacent to, the Site. No changes at the Site since the previous FYR were identified that could change the ecological risk assessment.

Regional groundwater elevations have been on a generally declining trend since groundwater investigation began at the Site in 1981, although groundwater elevations fluctuate upward or downward in the short term based on many factors, the most important of which is likely the annual precipitation amount in the region. Until 1987, groundwater in the Site vicinity was consistently encountered in the A-zone, which extends from approximately 15 to 45 feet bgs, but only rarely since 1987 has groundwater been encountered in the A-zone. During the FYR period of 2008 through 2012. uppermost groundwater was encountered in the upper portion of the B-zone, which extends from approximately 58 to 115 feet bgs. ©
19 PIN41 Site- la 11$35617 D A iters stes\201355-Yr RY* RpNDeall Rm I-.. 11kr URS Dieldrin. Only two monitoring wells had dieldrin detected from 2008 through 2012. For monitoring well 150-B1, there was a statistically significant decreasing trend, and the maximum detected concentration from 2008 through 2012 was 0.039 ug/L, which was substantially less than The groundwater flow direction in the Site vicinity in all of the monitored zones has consistently been interpreted as being toward the southwest at a gradient of approximately 0.005 foot per foot, which is equivalent to 26 feet per mile. This remained unchanged during the FYR period of 2008 through 2012. For reference, interpreted potentiometric-surface contour maps for the B-, C-, and Dzones for May 14,2012 are presented as Figures 4,5, and 6, respectively.

COC concentrations detected in groundwater samples have decreased substantially since groundwater investigation began at the Site in 1981 During the FYR period of 2008 through 2012, only 6 of the 19 sampled monitoring wells, and one of the 13 sampled domestic wells, contained detectable concentrations of the four non-regional COCs with established groundwater FRGs (i.e., dieldrin, chloroform. 1,2-DCA, and carbon tetrachloride), and none of the detected COC concentrations exceeded the FRGs. For reference, maps of the non-regional COC concentrations detected in groundwater samples in 2011 and 2012 are presented as Figures 7 and 8. respectively. A table of historical chemical detections in groundwater samples is presented in Appendix D. During the FYR period of 2008 through 2012, the following COCs were detected (Appendix D):

Carbon tetrachloride was detected at a maximum concentration of 0.36 ug/L in monitoring well 183-B2.

For this FYR, a statistical trend analysis of COC concentrations in groundwater samples was performed using the Mann-Kendall non-parametric test with a 95-percent confidence coefficient.

The trend analysis was performed using the past 15 years of analytical results (1998 through 2012), and was only performed for wells in which any COC was detected during the FYR period of 2008 through 2012. The trend analysis was performed for the four non-regional COCs with established groundwater FRGs. The trend analysis results are presented in detail in Appendix E and are summarized on Table 4, which also shows for reference the maximum COC concentrations detected at each well during the FYR period of 2008 through 2012. The trend analysis results are discussed below. The Mann-Kendall test requires a minimum of at least four data points, and there were six domestic wells which have not yet been sampled four times (wells 1017, 3022,3025, 3026, 3027, and 3029), but none of the non-regional COCs were detected in those wells from 2008 through 2012 anyway. • Chloroform was detected at maximum concentrations of 0.34, 7.3, 2.0, and 0.29 ug/L in monitoring wells 184-B1,184-C1, and 184-Dl and domestic well 1010, respectively. • 1,2-DCA was detected at maximum concentrations of 0.40 and 0.31 ug/L in monitoring wells 183-B2 and 184-C1, respectively; and
• Dieldrin was detected at maximum concentrations of 0.039 and 0.096 ug/L in monitoring wells 150-B1 and 183-B1, respectively.
20 K J’rject: TTLAN Sitc-15715251.17 "Deliwr le20)35-YrRo RpKptu6-29-l5.diy URS Summary of Statistical Trends in COC Concentrations. There were no FRG exceedances from 2008 through 2012. There are no apparent trends to indicate a reasonable likelihood of a future FRG exceedance for any of the wells. Two wells had increasing trends for chloroform, but the maximum detected chloroform concentration in these wells from 2008 through 2012 was 2.0 ug/L, which was substantially less than the FRG of 100 ug/L (or the new FRG of 80 ug/L recommended in Section 9.0). One well had an increasing trend for 1,2-DCA over the past 15 years, but when analyzed over 10 years or 5 years, there was no trend. The well had a 1,2-DCA concentration of 0.31 ug/L in 2008, which was less than the FRG of 0.5 ug/L, and had no 1,2-DCA detected from 2009 through 2012.

Chloroform. Three monitoring wells and one domestic well had chloroform detected from 2008 through 2012. For monitoring wells 184-B1 and 184-C1, there were no statistically significant trends, and the maximum detected concentrations from 2008 through 2012 were 0.34 and 7.3 ug/L, respectively, which were substantially less than the FRG of 100 ug/L (or the new FRG of 80 ug/L recommended in Section 9 0). For monitoring well 184-D1, there was a statistically significant increasing trend, but the maximum detected concentration from 2008 through 2012 was only 2 0 ug/L. For domestic well 1010, there was a statistically significant increasing trend, but the maximum detected concentration from 2008 through 2012 was only 0.29 ug/L. It is worth noting that chloroform has been widely detected in national studies of groundwater, especially in urban and residential areas, likely due to widespread chlorination of potable water supplies [USGS, 2004 & 2006]. Therefore, it is not entirely clear that the detections of chloroform are due to releases from the Site, especially as the City’s chlorinated potable water system was extended to the area immediately downgradient of the Site by 1990.Carbon Tetrachloride. Only one monitoring well had carbon tetrachloride detected from 2008 through 2012. For monitoring well 183-B2, there was a statistically significant decreasing trend, and the maximum detected concentration from 2008 through 2012 was 0.36 ug/L, which was less than the FRG of 0.5 ug/L. 1,2-DCA. Only two monitoring wells had 1,2-DCA detected from 2008 through 2012. For monitoring well 183-B2, there was a statistically significant decreasing trend, and the maximum detected concentration from 2008 through 2012 was 0.40 ug/L, which was less than the FRG of 0.5 ug/L. For monitoring well 184-C1, there was a statistically significant increasing trend using the past 15 years of analytical results (1998 through 2012). However, using the past 10 years of results (2003 through 2012), or the past 5 years of results (2008 through 2012), there was no statistically significant trend (Appendix E). As shown in Appendix E, 1,2-DCA was not detected in well 184-C1 from 1998 through 2003; then it was detected sporadically from 2004 through 2008, and it was not detected from 2009 through 2012. The maximum detected 1,2-DCA concentration in well 184-C1 was 0.34 ug/L in 2007, and that concentration was less than the FRG of 0.5 ug/L. the FRG of 0.3 ug/L. For monitoring well 183-B1, there was no statistically significant trend, and the maximum detected concentration from 2008 through 2012 was 0.096 ug/L.

6.5 SITE INSPECTION
©
6 6.6 INTERVIEWS
© A field person visits the Site at least every two weeks to check for vandalism or other issues. • There are no major O&M problems or issues at the Site. e Rodent burrows under the fence, and in the vegetative layer of the containment cover, are 21 K MProjedt THAN S 18? 1525679 Deliserabk.20136-Yr Rvu RpNpt U6-29. l5&e URSThe special Site inspection for the FYR was performed on May 9,2013 by Danny Domingo, PG, of DTSC and Stuart St. Clair, PE, of URS. USEPA’s “Five-Year Review Site Inspection Checklist” in Appendix E of the Comprehensive Five-Year Review Guidance was used as a guide for conducting the Site inspection. The completed checklist is provided in Appendix F, along with Site photographs taken in May 2013. The following is a summary of the important observations from the special Site inspection:

As part of the FYR process, the Site O&M manager, Bill Pretzer of Pretzer Farms (a subcontractor to URS) was interviewed by Stuart St. Clair of URS via telephone on May 13, 2013. Interview documentation is provided in Appendix G. Mr. Pretzer provided the following information:

The chainlink fence and gates are in good condition. At a few locations, rodent burrows (approximately 6-inch diameter) under the fence are present and need to be filled with top soil from the adjacent orchard. Some of the warning signs on the fence have deteriorated, are nearly illegible, and need to be replaced.

The containment cover is in good condition. No significant vegetative growth or erosion damage was observed. A few small rodent burrows (approximately 6-inch diameter and 6- inch deep) were observed in the vegetative top layer of the containment cover. These burrows need to be filled with top soil from the adjacent orchard. Placement of poison bait to control rodents (e.g., squirrels) should continue.

The monitoring wells are in good condition.The stormwater infiltration trench on the west and south sides of the containment cover is in good condition.

No accumulations of litter or debris, or signs of vandalism or unauthorized entry to the Site, were observed.

In the northeast quadrant of the Site, there is an unused water well that should be properly destroyed, because it has not been used in over one year, and THAN does not intend to use it in the future The well location is shown on Figure 2.filled in with top soil from the adjacent orchard, as they are found. • Rodent poison bait is placed in bait stations, and scattered in active burrows, on a monthly basis.

6.7 INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS
22 K:PrujeasJHiANi Ste-1 871525613 VDeliverethjeg)’ 55-Yr [email protected] doc URS A Covenant & Agreement to Restrict Use of Property for the TH. Agriculture & Nutrition Site (Deed Restriction) [DTSC, 2005a] was recorded on September 26,2005 for the Site to ensure that future land use activities will not adversely affect the integrity and/or effectiveness of the Soil Component of the Final Remedy or result in exposures to the public and the environment of COCs at the Site. The Deed Restriction is provided in Appendix H. A new title search was not conducted for this second FYR, because the parcel has not changed ownership since the previous FYR for which a title search was conducted and showed that the Deed Restriction was in place and functioning as intended.

No other relevant parties for interviews were identified during the FYR, As mentioned in Section

6.2, no members of the public have expressed interest in the FYR process. • A fewyears ago, vandals cut a hole in the fence and stole the electrical wire that ran from the utility pole to the on-site water supply well. The hole in the fence was repaired, and no further intrusion inside the fence have occurred. • In 2011, vandals stole the potable-water backflow prevention valve that is just outside the fence. The valve was replaced and placed inside a lockable steel cage set in concrete to discourage vandalism.

No evidence was found during the FYR to indicate that any portion of the Deed Restriction has been violated or is in danger of being violated.

The Deed Restriction sets forth:
• prohibited uses of the Site (i.e., the Site cannot be used as a residence, hospital, school, or day care center for children),
• requirements for management of on-site soils and extracted groundwater, if any;• prohibitions on disturbing the containment cover or monitoring wells; and• requirements for inspections and maintenance.

7.0 TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT

7.1 7.2
23 PTHAN Siu -187152567 U Deli chles\20135-Yi k.K RpD-f Rpl *6-28-] idix URS Yes, based on the second FYR activities, it appears that the Final Remedy is functioning as intended by the decision documents. The containment cover, fencing, and Deed Restriction, appear to be working in concert to severely restrict potential contact by human or ecological receptors with residual COCs in soil at the Site. The containment cover also restricts potential movement of residual COCs from on-site soils to other media (groundwater, surface water, and air). No significant O&M issues were identified during the FYR. Minor O&M issues are listed in Section

8.0, and relevant recommendations to address these minor issues are provided in Section 9.0.

USEPA identifies three questions in the Comprehensive Five-Year Review Guidance to assist in framing the technical assessment of whether the remedy has been, and will continue to be, protective of human health and the environment. Each of these three questions is addressed below.

Based on the second FYR activities, it appears that the exposure assumptions, toxicity data, cleanup levels, and remedial action objectives (RAOs) used at the time of remedy selection are still valid, with two exceptions that do not appear to affect current protectiveness, but could affect future protectiveness. These two exceptions are discussed below.

The Groundwater Component of the Final Remedy includes MNA of COCs in groundwater to ensure that unacceptable human exposures or environmental impacts are not occurring. Alternate water supplies have been provided to affected properties downgradient of the Site. None of the groundwater samples collected from monitoring or domestic wells during the FYR period of 2008 through 2012 contained COC concentrations exceeding the FRGs in fact, even during the first FYR period of 2003 through 2007, there were no FRG exceedances in groundwater samples. The last time an FRG exceedance occurred was in 2002 when a groundwater sample from well 183-B2 had 1,2-DCA and carbon tetrachloride concentrations that slightly exceeded the FRGs.

Recommendations for optimizing and streamlining the groundwater monitoring program are provided in Section 9.0.

QUESTION B: ARE THE EXPOSURE ASSUMPTIONS, TOXICITY DATA, CLEANUP LEVELS, AND REMEDIAL ACTION OBJECTIVES (RAOs) USED AT THE TIME OF REMEDY SELECTION STILL VALID?
QUESTION A: IS THE REMEDY FUNCTIONING AS INTENDED BY THE DECISION DOCUMENTS?
The federal MCL for total trihalomethanes (chloroform, bromoform, bromodichloromethane, and dibromochloromethane) in public drinking water systems has been reduced from 100 to 80 ug/L. This issue is listed in Section 8.0, and a relevant recommendation to address this change is provided in Section 9.0. For reference, the highest chloroform concentration detected in groundwater samples collected from monitoring and domestic wells during the FYR period of2008 through 2012 was 7 3 ug/L in monitoring well 184-C1.

7.3 7.4 TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT SUMMARY
24 PAT IAN Sil; IN:15256V 1 Dcuverabl 120115-Yz Rvw Bir u Apl I *2K-lakx URS QUESTION C: HAS ANY OTHER INFORMATION COME TO LIGHT THAT COULD CALL INTO QUESTION THE PROTECTIVENESS OF THE REMEDY? No other information was obtained during the second FYR to call into question the protectiveness of the Final Remedy.

Based on the second FYR activities, it appears that the Final Remedy is functioning as intended by the decision documents Minor O&M issues are listed m Section 8.0. and relevant recommendations to address these minor issues are provided in Section 9.0 Recommendations for optimizing and streamlining the groundwater monitoring program are provided in Section 9.0, along with a recommendation to decrease the FRG for chloroform in groundwater.

The multi-pathway health risk assessment did not address the possibility of future vapor intrusion of COCs to buildings that may be constructed at or near the Site [ENVIRON, 1996]. However, there are no current buildings at or adjacent to the Site, and there are no plans to construct such buildings.

Therefore, vapor-intrusion concerns appear unwarranted at this time.

8.0 ISSUES
Issues identified during the second FYR process are summarized below:

La
No No
No No
No No
No Yes
25 ATI IAN Sne-1 #71323017 W Delivurabk:s:20l 75. ¥ r Rvw RpilDrall Rp 06-29 13 ahv. URS The on-site water well has not been used in over one
year, and THAN does not intend to use it in the future.The federal MCL for total trihalomethanes, which include chloroform, has been reduced to 80 ug/L.

Affects Current
Protectiveness
(Yes or No)
Affects Future
Protectiveness
(Yes or No)
Some of the warning signs on the perimeter fence have deteriorated and are nearly illegible.

A few rodent burrows were observed under the fence and
in the vegetative layer of the containment cover.

Issue

9.0 RECOMMENDATIONS AND FOLLOW-UP ACTIONS
The following recommendations are provided to address the issues identified in Section 8.0.

Oversight Party
Issue Recommendations Agency Responsible
Animalburrowing at few periodically. Monitor burrowing to DTSC THAN Ongoing locationsDeteriorated signs Replace with new signs. DTSC THAN 12/31/2013 THAN 03/31/2014
Reduced Reduce FRG for chloroform in DTSC THAN Immediately chloroform MCL groundwater to 80 ug/L
26 F ll-N Sit 17152567.0 Deuy,hlesaOLC Yr Ky RpDri Ept Un-zr li.dk URS Fill holes with top soil from adjacent orchard, as found. Place poison bait For the monitoring wells that are not proposed for further sampling, it is recommended that they not be sealed and decommissioned at this time, but rather that they be used for annual water-level monitoring, and that the calculated groundwater elevations in those wells, along with the wells that are still sampled, be used for generating potentiometric surface maps to assess the groundwater flow directions and gradients in the B-, C-. and D-zones. Then, if any unusual analytical results are Fresno
County
Perforate casing and seal full depth of
water well and annular space with
cement/bentonite grout pumped
through tremie pipe by a California C57-licensed water well contractor.

Unused. on-site
water well
in addition, based on the data review summar ized in Section 6.4, it appears that optimization and streamlining of the groundwater monitoring program is warranted. There have been no exceedances of the groundwater FRGs in any monitoring well or domestic well samples since 2002, more than 10 years ago, nor are there any apparent trends to indicate a reasonable likelihood of a future FRG exceedance for any of the wells. Furthermore, all parcels downgradient of the Site have been provided with alternate water supplies (either City water connection or household carbon adsorption system). Therefore, it is recommended to scale back the groundwater sampling to include only selected monitoring wells immediately upgradient and downgradient of the Site (monitoring wells 29-B, 150-B1/C1, 151-A1/B1/C1, and 154-Al/Bl/Cl), and selected domestic wells within %2 mile downgradient and crossgradient from the Site for which less than four samples have been collected within the previous 15 years, precluding a meaningful trend analysis (domestic wells 1017.3022, 3025,3026,3027. and 3029). The proposed revised groundwater monitoring program is summarized in Table 5, and well locations are shown on Figures 2 and 3. ensure rodent-control barrier stays
intact.

Milestone
Date
27 PATH N Ui 17152567.0 Delavzrablesk2D43S Y Ev RpiDral Ept L-28-13 Js URS obtained for the wells that are still sampled, follow-up sampling will still be possible in the wells that are no longer routinely sampled, after discussing the unusual analytical results with DTSC. By the time of the next (third) FYR or possibly sooner, if few or no unusual analytical results have been obtained in the interim, then it may be recommended to seal and decommission some or all of the monitoring wells that are no longer routinely sampled.

10.0 PROTECTIVENESS STATEMENT
28 PTHAN S.c18715256V0Dchverable‘261,S- Y Rv wKprDali Rpl URS Based on the second FYR activities documented herein, it appears that the Final Remedy for the Site is functioning as intended and remains protective of human health and the environment.

The Soil Component of the Final Remedy includes a containment cover, fencing, and a Deed Restriction. all of which combine to severely restrict potential contact by human or ecological receptors with residual COCs in soil at the Site. The containment cover also restricts potential movement of residual COCs from on-site soils to other media (groundwater, surface water, and air). The Groundwater Component of the Final Remedy includes MNA of COCs in groundwater to ensure that unacceptable human exposures or environmental impacts are not occurring. None of the groundwater samples collected from monitoring or domestic wells during the FYR period of 2008 through 2012 contained COC concentrations exceeding the FRGs, nor are there any apparent trends to indicate a reasonable likelihood of a future FRG exceedance for any of the wells.

11.0 NEXT REVIEW
29 p* m 2 Sele- 187152569.0 Diflicrable/7Ul1V5-Yr Rvw RpiDrall RM 16-2h 13, URS The next (third) FYR is scheduled to be completed five years after the official completion date of this second FYR.

12.0 REFERENCES
30 PSIHANSic- 1#71525617. Diherahk 10136 Yr Ry wRpiDrnKpt “6-23-1 * tk: URS Kennedy/Jenks Consultants [K/J, 2004] Final Remedial Action Completion Report, T.H.

Agriculture & Nutrition, L.L.C.. Eastern Fresno County, California, September 28,2004.

California Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Toxic Substances Control [DTSC, 2005a]. Covenant & Agreement to Restrict Use of Property for the T.H. Agriculture & Nutrition Site. September 26. 2005.

California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley Region [RWQCB, 2004]. Water Quality Control Plan for Tulare Lake Basin. Second edition, revised January 2004 with approved amendments.

Kennedy/Jenks Consultants [K/J, 1996]. Recommendation for Permanent Closure of Soil Vapor Extraction Systems in the Former laboratory and Solvent Storage Areas, T.H. Agriculture &Nutrition,LLC., Eastern Fresno County, California, September 16, 1996.

Kennedy/Jenks Consultants [K/J, 2003]. Documentation Report for Implementation of Soil Component of Final Remedy, T.H. Agriculture & Nutrition, LLC., Eastern Fresno County, California, June 26, 2003.

Kennedy/Jenks Consultants [K/J, 2005], Operation, Maintenance and Monitoring Plan for the T.H. Agriculture & Nutrition Site, Eastern Fresno County, California, September 21.2005 California Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Toxic Substances Control [DTSC, 2005b]. Operation, Maintenance and Monitoring Agreement far the T.H. Agriculture & Nutrition Site. September 29,2005.

Kennedy/Jenks Consultants [K/J, 1988]. Quality Assurance Project Plan. THAN, Fresno County, California, April 13, 1988, amended August 3, 1988.

Kennedy/Jenks Consultants [K/J. 19931. Remedial Investigation Summary Report, THAN, Eastern Fresno County, California, 1993.

ENVIRON Corporation [ENVIRON, 1996]. Multipathway Health Risk Assessment far the THAN Site Report. January 31. 1996.

Kennedy/Jenks Consultants [K/J, 1999]. Final Remedial Action Plan, T.H Agriculture & Nutrition, LLC., Eastern Fresno County, California, June 1999.

Kennedy/Jenks Consultants [K/J, 2007a]. Five-Year Review Work Plan, T.H. Agriculture & Nutrition, LLC, Eastern Fresno County, California, April 25, 2007, Kennedy/Jenks Consultants [K/J, 1998]. Technical and Economic Feasibility’ Evaluation, T.H.

Agriculture & Nutrition, LLC., Eastern Fresno County, California, July 2,1998.

Kennedy/Jenks Consultants [K/J, 2011]. Evaluation of DBCP and TCP in Underlying 31 PTILAN Sile-1R71525f 7 O Deliver./ a~20l. Yr Rv RpiDrun Rm IM-1 l34. URS Groundwater. T.H. Agriculture & Nutrition Site, Eastern Fresno County. California, February 18, 2011.

Kennedy/Jenks Consultants [K/J, 2007b]. Evaluation of Site Compliance Status and Proposed Modifications in Groundwater Monitoring, T.H. Agriculture & Nutrition Site. Eastern Fresno County, California, September 14, 2007.

Kleinfelder, J.H. & Assocates [Kleinfelder, 1987]. Phase 1 Groundwater Assessment Summary, TH Agriculture and Nutrition Company, Inc. Fresno County, California, November 18. 1987.

United States Geological Survey [USGS, 2004]. Chloroform in the Hydrologic System - Sources, Transport. Fate. Occurrence, and Effects on Human Health and Aquatic Organisms, USGS Scientific Investigations Report 2004-5137.

United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 [USEPA, 2006a]. Notice of Intent to Delete the T.H. Agriculture & Nutrition Site from the National Priorities List, 71 Fed. Reg. 39,031, July 11,2006.

United States Environmental Protection Agency [USEPA, 2006]. Notice of Deletion of the T.H.

Agriculture & Nutrition Site from the National Priorities List, Federal Register, 11 Fed. Reg. 48,479, August 21, 2007.

United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 [USEPA, 2006b]. Notice of Deletion of the T.H. Agriculture & Nutrition Site from the National Priorities List, 71 Fed. Reg. 48,479, August 21, 2006.

United States Geological Survey [USGS, 2006]. Volatile Organic Compounds in the Nation’s Ground Water and Drinking-Water Supply Wells, USGS Circular 1292, April 2006.

Kennedy/Jenks Consultants [K/J, 2010]. Year 2009 Annual Report for the T.H. Agriculture & Nutrition Site, Fresno County, California, March 31,2010.

Science & Engineering Analysis Corporation [SEACOR, 1993]. Feasibility Study Report for the T.H. Agriculture & Nutrition Site, June 30, 1993.

United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 [USEPA, 2005]. Final Close-Out Report for the T.H. Agriculture & Nutrition Site. Fresno, California, September 29, 2005.

Kennedy/Jenks Consultants [K/J, 2008]. Five-Year Review Report for T.H. Agriculture & Nutrition Site, Fresno County, California, October 3, 2008.

United States Environmental Protection Agency [USEPA, 2001]. Comprehensive Five-Year Review Guidance (OSWER No. 9355.7-03B-P), June 2001.
32 PATHAN Silc-1871325617.0-DrlivzrhleyO3V-Yt B.ReND: dlRpi 1-2 Li di URS URS Corporation [URS, 2013b]. Year 2012 Annual Monitoring Report, T.H. Agriculture & Nutrition Site, 7183 East McKinley Avenue, Fresno County, California, March 21, 2013.

URS Corporation [URS, 2013aJ. Second Five-Year Review Work Plan, T.H. Agriculture & Nutrition Site, 7183 East McKinley Avenue, Fresno County, California, February 12,2013, revision 1.

URS Corporation (URS, 2011]. Year 2010 Annual Monitoring Report, T.H. Agriculture & Nutrition Site, 7183 East McKinley Avenue. Fresno County-, California, March 31.2011.

URS Corporation [URS, 2012]. Year 2011 Annual Monitoring Report, T.H. Agriculture & Nutrition Site, 7183 East McKinley Avenue, Fresno County, California, March 28, 2012.

Chemical of Concern
Dieldrin
Chloroform 100
1,2-DCA 0.5
Carbon Tetrachloride 0.5
1,2,3-TCP NNDBCP NN
DBCP = 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane
1,2-DCA = 1,2-dichloroethane
1,2,3-TCP = 1,2,3-trichloropropane
NN = non-numeric due to regional presence
ug/L = micrograms per liter
Final Remediation Goal
(ug/L)

0.3 NOTES;
TABLE 1

FINAL REMEDIATION GOALS FOR GROUNDWATER
T H Agriculture and Nutrition Site
Fresno County, CA

Comments
Monitoring Wells:
29-B B Biennial
30-A A
30-B B
31-A A
31-B B32-A A
32-E B
150-B1 B Anrual
150C1 C Annual
A131-A 1 Resaturation Response Sampied annually if A-zone resaturates 151-B1 AnnualB151-C1 AnnualC154-A1 A Sampled annually if A-zone resaturates.154-B1 8 C Annual154C1
A165-A1 Sampled annually If A-zone resaturates.
155-BO B
155-C1 C Biennial181-B1 B Annual
181-CC C Annual
181 -D1 D Annual
183-B1 8 Annual183-82 B Annual
183-C1 C Annual183-01 AnnualD
184-B1 B Annual
C184-C1 Annual
D Annual
986 Annual
1005 Annual
1010 Annual
1012 Quadrennial
1017 Quadrennial
1021 Annual
3019 Quadrennial Group 1
3020 Annual
3022 Quadrennial
3025 Quadrencial3026 Quadrennial
3027 Quadrennial
3029 Quadrennial
Sampled in odd-numbered calendar years.Sampled in odd-numbered calendar years Sampling
Frequency
Well
Name
Resaturation Response
Exceedance Response
Resaturation Response Exceedance Response
Resaturation Response
Exceedance Response
Group 1Group 2
Group 1
Group 2
Group 2
Group 2Group 1
NOTES:

Hydrogeologic zone information is unavailable for domestic wells.

FRG = final remediation goal
Sampled in odd-numbered calendar years.Sampled annually if A-zone resaturatesSampled annually if FRGs exceeded at well clusters 150.151, or 155.

Sampled annually if A-zone resaturales.Sampled annually if FRGs exceeded at well clusters 150,151, or 155.Sampled annually if A-zone resaturates.Sampled annually if FPGs exceeded at well clusters 150,151, or 155 Hydrogeologic
Zone
Resaturation Response
Annual
184-01
Domestic Wells:

Resaturation Response
Biennial
TABLE 2

GROUNDWATER MONITORING PROGRAM SUMMARY
T H Agriculture and Nutrition Site
Fresno County, CA

LI i=A
Reference Points(D)
Top of Ground
Sounding Surface
Port Elevation
।
i
Notes:

Sand
Pack
Grout
Seal
Well
Name
155-BO 155-01
181-B1
181-CO181-D1
183-B1183-B2 183-C1
183-D1184-B1
184-C1184-D1

82.5 158
93 160
213.5
92 113170
201
100160
203
Solid
Casing
342 29340.29
339.69340.11339.05331.79331.95331 91
121

51.5 121

51.5 120

51.5 121.5
92 157

39.5 90
153
39 92
152
45 0-47 0-140-47 0-120-470-150-55 0-76
0-141
0-160-74
0-125
0-17
0-76
0-137
0-12
29-B
30-A 30-B31-A31-B32-A32-B
150-B1 150-C1
151-A1151-B1 151-C1 154-A1
154-B1 154-C1 155-A1
57-77
144-154
81-91
135-145
201-211
80-90
99-109
157-167 185-195
87-97
147-157 187-197
344.95345.81
346.94345.83
346.48346.29
346.31
347.78348.20348.18348.79346.69347.69
348 07
349 06
348.74
54-82.5
141-157.5
79-93
129-148
196-213.5
76-92
95-111
163-170 181-201
83-100
139-160
183-203
Bentonite
Seal
347.68
346.38
342.88
343.08343.18338.58338.58338.58
338.48
332.68332.68332.68
350.76345.73
341.90
। 341.99
343.71345.93345.84
345.32345.22345.70
345.53346.06345.92345.45345.25345.05346.26346.09346.29347.58 Screen Casing
90-120
20-50
90-120
19-49
80-110
20-50
80-110
82-92
147-157

22.5-37.5
80-90
137-147
23-39
82-92
143-153
15-25;
30-40
0-90 0-20 0-90 0-19
0-80 0-200-80 0-82
0-147
0-22.5
0-80
0-137
0-23 0-82
0-143
0-15;
25-30;
40-45
0-57
0-144
0-81
0-135 0-201
0-80 0-99
0-157 0-185
0-87
0-147 0-187
47-51
14-17
47-51
12-15
47-51
15-18
55-58
76-79
141-144
16-19
74-77
125-131
17-20
76-79
137-140 12-13 5,

26.5-28;
41-45

51.5-54
137-141
74-79
124-129
192-196
72-7691-95
159-163 177-181
79-83
134-139 177-183
0-51.5
0-137
0-74
0-1240-192
0-72 0-91
0-159
0-177
0-79
0-134 0-189
51-120
17-50
51-120
15-49
51-120
18-50
58-110
79-92
144-157

19.5-38
77-90
131-148
20-39
79-92
140-153

13.5-26.5;
28-41
(a) Values describe construction of the well in feet below ground surface.(b) Reference points are measured with respect to the 1929 North American Vertical Datum (feet above mean sea level).
(c) Depth of original boring in feet below ground surface. Well casing may be slightly shorter (up to several feet, in some instances) due to hole closure or sidewall sloughing during completion. Differences of one to two feet may be found between these data and incidental references in other reports. Such differences are common, reflecting disparities between observers or between design and as-built measurements.

Total
Depth
(ft)’-)
Construction Interval by Depth (ft)’a)
TABLE 3

MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY
T H Agriculture and Nutrition Site
Fresno County, CA

Non-RegionelCOCs
Oleldrin Chiorolor 1,2-DCA Cartion Telrechloride
MonAoring
Cormrets
150-81 0039 Becrasng NA NA
150-G1 NA NA NA NA
151-81 NA N". HA +
151-C1 NA TA
154-E. NA NA15.C1 MA NA NA
153-80
155-Ct NA t) NA t
1:-B1 NA NA

IS -CO NA

NA NA NA
Nane 0.098 NA NA HA
NP MS 0.40 Decrutsen 0.30
NA NANA183-01 NA NANA164-8 Nare 0.* NA NA
1MC1 NA None 7.3 ht rrewaing NA touimmedju,akul perd for 1.2-DCAcer200-2012 and 200 2019 Munm pododa. 184-01 NA NA
986 NA
1005 KA NAPA NA
1010 s 029 NA
10:2 NA101/ NA Onbyrordedmw, anesto tM«
1021 NA NA
3019 HA

NA NA KA
3022 NA NA
2025 NA NA NA NA
3026 NA NA NA
3027 NA NA k
3029 NA HA NA
FRG 0.3 100 0.6
L... .....
1’W113-01
Onis, nandidi onksi -a.
owsarpfedigimestocust. Gimmmilemtmemtita. O-yamneao eng Ieloeain, 1B1-D1
113^1
Decreasing
NA
Maxkmum
Concenirston,
2006 - 2012
("9/
Sistinfcalhy
Sigollleed Tend
1908- 2012
NA
NOTES:

Trend er vyaes peri- -J «Pr"JCL 4,1.0Tsok ane unm *e Mann-Kendal *twh a R. c • dance com'iant.Trend anefyens ware o pcrloimed for wells I v.ch COGs have basn datacaad in the nredcis 5 yeum (2009 Ihreoh 2012 For # 1and •=, an-deunct aru"st sesuhs vNe repl. cd with ona-half te taboniony pracici quar. won lim In cat:" s her. tepkcls Pames wner an's "6, te h gher conter fraun from the prmaryrap1 1 andlsos.e used In the trand dey:- COC = chemical ff
1,2-DCA - 12-d aldorosthar
FB3 = Inal remediation goc lrom the J mi 1901 Fina Ri zde Action Plan NAan analyzed for trend throwama analyt, 3 delections ol COCm th previous 6 zsars (2000 theug2012) ugLmnrogamsperr____
Siatistically
Signilieadt Trend,
1B90-2B12
NA
Sadistically
Significant Trand,
18-8-20ia
NA
Madam
2000-2012
.0)
Statlsdealy
GignihcamTe end.
1908-2012
NA
Masmum
Concentration,
2000 - 2012
_ (ugn)
NA
was
aB
Maximum
2009-2012
(up)
TABLE 4
1998 - 2012 GROUNDWATER STATISTICAL TREND ANALYSIS RESULTS SUMMARY T K Agroultur and Nutt on Site
Fromno County, CA

Comments
Monitoring Wells:
29-B B Annual
150-BI B Annual150-£1 AnnualC
151-Al Sampled annually if A-zone resaturates
15-81 B
15:-C i Annual154-Al A Sampled annually if A-zone resaturates.154-B1 B154-C.1 C Annual Domestic Wells.
1017 Annual
3022 Annual3025 Annual3026 Annual3027 Annual3029 Annual Sampling
Frequency
Well
Name
Hydrogeologic
Zone
NOTES
Hydrogeologic zone information is unavailable for domestic wells.

Groundwater samples will be analyzed to organochlorine pesticides (EPA 8081A), volatile organic compounds (EPA 5260B). anti DBCP and 1,2.3-TCP (EPA 504.1 ) Water levels will be measured annually In the above monitoring wells, as well as in all other non-decommissioned monitoring wells Resaturation Response
Annual
Resaturation Response
Annual
TABLE 5

PROPOSED REVISED GROUNDWATER MONITORING PROGRAM
T H Agriculture and Nutrition Site
Fresno County, CA

NUR:LVP: (T! 1NulntonV S Site Locoton Me.mid NS 05 Jun 2013 SAC te I
"Redding
i I Sacramen.
— IF rancisco
Frezno
«fakersfeld D
" 1
$
..
■
I
— -
4%
■r
"T —
$
Slaei
a)
1 4—
E) t
1 El=1d/ • T—a
i. JI
d i
r
1 —
—
54 ila
R
1 4
7 1 0 150 300
Feet
Source: NAIP Imagery, 2010
URS
4 a 1
1/
•«
1 4 thtwes
I
—
...
| ]
i
1 Site Location Map
T H Agriculture & Nutrition Site
Fresno County, California
Figure 1
Legend
Parcel Boundary
Site Boundary
GUEv
F
i
i
1 1-5
q54 oe
s
Los Angeles (
I
hr R.." —un
cl( o
s
O
gel
।
i
N
A
4 apane;
. I FGF.N’..

I
I
o Irrigotion & Other Supply Wels
Groundwoter Monitoring Well
MUI Ditch
McKinky
r 2-5
SITE
32-1
**• J
. 151-nc—
L‘t_
30-AB Os
1 1
)
1 Pine -IN
i
! C
rar
I
i
i
i
THAN Property EundorySite Boundary (Fance)
1i
***
150-B1,C1
- NOTES:

1. (rrigalion well 905 wos decommissoned and
ssaled in 2009.
445 Aap’
Ouusgn
WATER
SUPPLY
WELL
iI
4155-A1,B0
on-An
|
1i (J!I
$
el
URS ct1 1123 Swam Rptss2vs d.g" 55 t

ON-SITE AND NEAR-SITE WELL LOCATION MAP
T H Agriculture & Patrition Site
Fresno Count, Calf
... FtUmE2
Temparonce
o% LEGEND:
i

0. 9330.
0%34
□ Domestic Wall
38s ♦ Groundwoter Monitoring Well
4 Afut Diieh I 154-ALBLC1
Udniey
Os%
T
I l
SITE 29-3 978,
1 $15-
_SMC9
_
9400
s ’
y .9402Q %
152-ALB1E i 10
181-31C0,D1 $
;
1038Q
198 98
1 Florgdoro
4 oflec
I H%u
Teem 1xar
4 30210
7,,
I
‘83
j 7
3029 Q O
3020 92 . .950 ’ O.
!
. O I
%
i .
..2180. c
Ols
i
$89 8 1e88 — 8 1 i | .

S 5107 woreekona?”" T
%a
1 dues * f
0 28a)
0ss - I
■ J
kavy 184-1,C1n C.5B9 ”8 iigat
‘8
%6r.
o i
*
£ semoocnge
r w । ■ । uzsi
I Be'mont
e
I
I— 1
Raz i
naQ i
36130
URS Job uwri.n Errlerpkgsfasiwg csan-20-s FIGURE 3
. Q19
0304
THAN Properly BoLnda,
Site Boundary (Fenc]
385
970
o
92 ‘C
i 0930
0937
C
1024
o.
931
1 T
381
3011
o
305,,2 a8%
153-mmet M3
% Y.i,
$
&
hP &
8, lo i
7 1010
=p.98*2d
L 1,9 ■
O
‘o'
h
2 . 922
9 1823“$2z6"4°—a,

OFF-SITE WELL LOCATION MAP
T H Agncullure & Nutiilion
-------Fresno County, Calfornia
8"%4 9878
“I
*0,
R2,
===
189 ..
-on,e""E" -
-8” 2
/ °F
. 774 I
—
os- LEGEND:

O Domestic Wall
Mil Ditch
“aE“3 \
CNN
+28 q 295
♦
MUI
McKWay 1
40410 199" Owr
1040 .
o
0930 !
280.
30000 1
V 20028382] i
— "8 wPL. „ 1.

Florodora O—
%
‘8.

H *
f O O. ua9
■ c
%3
1 Ofve 85
D107—
"8 % I
_P.
tn : {—
UHurvey31
% 907 ,P. ;
%
20 ri Dr
Po.
£ 1
I
..

III
ii Boont u& 1Pes
t@
Kerms30130

B-ZONE POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE
URS _
interpreted Potentiometric
Surfoce Elavation Contour
(Feet AMSL)
29-B I
28915
150-3.
284.36
AC
-0
03024
----- THAN Propert: Boundary
4-B1 •------* Site Boundary Fence)
17 27
3004
o
1785
NOTES:

1. n/’m = not measured

2. ASL = Above Mean Sea Level

3. All contour ore approximate.
29-B ।
280 15
&hs 4*
3a.
. | |
923
1 Q
I
' -o | j
‘s0
G
:1037
I
MAY 14, 2012
T H Agriculture & Nutrition Sits
Fresno County, Califomia
FIGURE 4
. .4o.kso “887%3
grd"ke?
38-
2027
&
9320
i 0334
osB
“’A ;
0”33
Ad 16715558
Groundwater Monitoring Well
Montoring Well Nome and
Potentiamainic Surface Elevation
(Feet AMSL)
2023
0 7 oea
161-B
276.10
X ' *
' I
0938 09% LEGEND:
/
79230.

I [28539]
II . ...

D Domestic Wrll
Afl bitoK
~% Groundwater Monitoring Well
MU Dch J t X McKinley 154-£T
10410 095s 287 47
AkSS 280.
.30009.

Q ..
931 Soar
I 10380
8 ("8 “d 5
wP
78‘o==s s%9.4,, L8
iM0 “o
I Flcraacra
Lows
I
r
--- ----
J 193-Cl
...i 27970,
Gu
es
O
j 974 •
pootty
i T8 3089 "8 so”’ j 4
o

90. ■■■ 921
• ° I ' c
• 3087
| i O
□Em ,977 O3024
*887"73P027 oleoa 128,7 iR. ‘ %a
I "8 3
i ..................
s &—)— •
115 i
C969
L/ aggei L&
157 4 bM»2, . -(N i . !
J
7do "o - IPRoganSexE & 5E2aimalvxi
5 Balmont i iDet
’ C Qes ieco
ii|1
Ker
m2Q
M30
URS b tbo $
150-CI 283.35
, Q9
097
IHAN Property Boundary
Sits Boundory (Fence)
923.

P
970
o
4)
971
Monitoring Wr’l Name and
Potentiometric Surface Elevation
(Feet AMSL)
Interpreted Potentiometric
Surface Elevation Contour
(Feet AMSL)
1040 Q
822“PR(B78°hez.
hsr
___
-NOTES:1. n/’m = not measured

2. AMSL - Above Mean Sac Level

3. All contours are approximate.

C-ZONE POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE
MAY 14, 2012
T H Agniulture & Nuirilice Sile
_ ___________.___ ___ _________ - — . . Fresno County, California — FIGURES
5 154-C1
1 286.86
306
O
1 _ *ow.
—o. £
151-c
" 282 (9
.0 Na
*009m‘”)A#7. L j974. V
965 3M4
l° • °
LEGEND: 07 0336 -9-130
—C2. — 1 o
MM Ditch
3002
MU Ztek
‘340 owa $ ■S' . 27 9nt

1. .. 0330, ‘
* 276.
0937
’■"•o'
[ & +s % 1
1 ■ wsO

8. ?8‘0===
Florudara
97a
so* “I “
oxle
u
8,
r
97: 183-51
7 3089 .9
$22 L
Q.
a03a th
P . O
8*8‘
OP9 95BO
%
OWe 03024
T - ! 38%
N
%3 *&7 %. 1
“c.
!
.aus
o
!-
7 I 1 -
I
.Os 00n

8.P«|
l" T ! sour % !
1 8,
450 90o r
Ges
!
1 2si Bemont 2
CH &
3ez - 8
lo
II 30130
URS
pR FIGURE 6
1B1-D1
274.37
923
n :
d
I
THAN Proparly Boundory Site Boundary (Fence)
Domestic Well
I
I
NQTES:.

1. n/m = not mecisured

2. AMSL = Above Mean Sea Level

3. Ail contours are approximate.
earecta.

D-ZONE POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE
MAY 14,2012
T H Agriculture & Nubition Sits
Fremno Counly. Calilomia
"z
3*0.: 3027
&
1385
Groundwater Moniloring Well
Monitoring Well Nome and Potentiometric Surface Elevation(Feet AMSL) nem
"0009,
I turpreted Pulentlometric Surface Elevatior Contour(Feet AMSL) ^7
%&&g 1,78/08%
3023
o
r ।
50r,
1&. JU
I
I
' 183-01
i 286.74
i C ' i
0936 LEGEND:
9330
4 0
VW Ditch
|
i 2%s
VW Dita
McKir’ty
I0410 0993
‘8°. 51
SITE 1
130009 .
mne-ncont %l mm?8,”8s& s&..
' m3eC,
881,8%
15MU, 3888 "8 153-ALB.C1 -013 --
: ** ! $9.9. | ,9 33 ?=
Florodors NOTES:
t ■ * 2%f9n
3022
785013061%89m c
P8
Q792
1 923
0 Y8
,MMB3-31,B2.C1,’
Zune .‘8
30% ; --- ...

3. Hydrogeologic
for domestic
E
3130 9 o 1 i
o
’ C
95 ,92.%%2, wg8883a I’ !
Olve
1,2-DCA — =
78 *83730° 1&%7 %o”*d‘s 2 “Dr
786 c

7. 2Re)
= I
J
Horvey *164-m£1,”1 Osas 10 i 88 1 ■
% C98? 1 I* of.?. . 1 I
! ,
Bor I FEET
! f"1
. ii
I
x_ll
Be mon
1034Q Vs ■ w8s9.
931
Sni
Ben;
30420
30130
URS sa. s*Rredr"mn i J-A?
THAN Properly Bourdory
Site Boundary (Fence)
<0.5

0.27 J
§
I
Groundwaler Mon’toring We!
Domestic Well
Zone
Bl
a
Di
I I
Zone
BlB2
zone infcrmotion is unovallable
wells.

Chloroform

0.28 J
o.
931
T H Agriculture & Nutrition Site
Fresno County, California
FIGURE 7

NON-REGIONAL COC CONCENTRATIONS DETECTED IN GROUNDWATER 2011
P_
+1+
o
M3
Chloroform

0.32 J

3.8 1.7
3027
§.
0930
017
87 92s
o
7030
J.
.62772a76o...
;

1. Chemical cf coneam (COC) concentrations
shtwn are in micragroms per liter.

2. Replicate results are not shown.

A
‘00
* 9400
.9. ..941-1.
1SE-N,1.4
32 5 9741
- — 1032
9 IKB
.........

Q
8‘8‘
Dieldrin

0.082<0.05 —r
.3011
o
o 4
_de,
i
o%b LEGEND:
1930.

O
In Ditch
3&s"20%,
Mi2 Ditch McKiniey ;
I0410 - 099
18° ‘ i 939
J SITE
H.“"Q .....
• % m8xa 88,8.38
5 18k-BL,CD,ML.0-: s9 r8-AinL:

Flondorg
*08 2"% 88
. & NOTES:
' send run
5gS J 308103010 ■mo. 09%
9r3:
18 “9 ~09
783
i- i!
O 922:
‘9n1 J
974
8 Zone “8
g
950. i
4 •
i O%L
;
c
: 3027
9585 -o88&s. ‘ 8883 -28. He ili
Olive Qi
%. T 118%7 ! 1
id : 9250
I i i Q. c
[aka)- H ri ■ *, >
Marvaj
I son.
i O.
t
!
!
) 0
‘d
i i % i
1188 Qas K2ePe O,
I9%e7 | ! 9 /
109 gl : 1
I
I
w429 5

30.30 HI
URS Job criza (s S*RP-RBRgT*J oaa.. T.

THA’ Property Bounder,
Site Bcunccry (Feece)
921
o
!
i
Croundeater Monitoring We
Domestic well
Dieldrin

0.096
Zone
B1
Zone
C1
Di
092
0m7
Chloroform

0.29 J

NON-REGIONAL COC CONCENTRATIONS DETECTED IN GROUNDWATER 2012
98 1 2
3-merm
on r 3029
0 O
2 wpzj"**
• - "
lis"t *—i—1—I- - ] 8 Chloroform
0 ! 1
i i
o

3.5 1.4
’ * ‘ ‘8
* s400
“ 240-P2
T I Agiculuse & Nubiition site
______Fresno Cuunly, Califonia
FIGURE 8
ms-Aime 1013 C '■ “ .%
°h.
d"**
n ape w Fil:

1. Chemical of concern (COC) concentrations
shown ore in microgrom par Eter.

2. Replicate results are nol shown

3. Hydrogsolic zora Infurmation is unavailable
for domes c walla.
o.P.

APPENDIX A

FIVE-YEAR REVIEW SUMMARY FORM
।
Ii
Five-Year Review Summary Form
Site Name: THAN Site, 7183 E. McKinley Ave, Fresno County, CA EPA ID: CAD009106220Region: 9 State: CA | City/County: Fresno County NPL Status: Deleted
Author name (Federal or State Project Manager): Mr. Danny DomingoAuthor affiliation: California Department of Toxic Substances Control Review period: January 2013 - September 2013 (tentative completion date) Date of site inspection: May 9, 2013
Type of review: Policy
Review number: 2
Triggering action date: October 22, 2008
Due date (five years after triggering action date): October 22, 2013 Title i

SITE IDENTIFICATION

SITE STATUS
i
j

REVIEW STATUS
Multiple OUs?
No
Has the site achieved construction completion?
Yes
Lead agency: StateIf “Other Federal Agency” was selected above, enter Agency name: Click here to enter text.
।
i«i
j
Five-Year Review Summary Form (continued)
OU(s) without issues/Recommendations identified in the F i..
i
OU(s): 1
Oversight Party Milestone Date
No No State Ongoing
T
issues and Recommendations identified in the Five-Year R i.

OU(s): 1
Oversight Party Milestone Date
No No State 12/31/2013
Issues and Recommendations Identified in the Five-Year R ii
OU(s): 1
Oversight Party Milestone Date
No No Other 03/31/2014
ii Title
Issues/Recommendations
Affect Current
Protectiveness
Affect Future
Protectiveness
Affect Current
ProtectivenessAffect Current
Protectiveness
Affect Future
Protectiveness
Affect Future
Protectiveness
The table below is for the purpose of the summary form and associated data entry and does not replace the two tables required in Section VIII and IX by the FYR guidance. Instead, data entry in this section should match information in Section VII and IX of the FYR report.

Implementing
Party
PRP
ImplementingParty
PRP
ImplementingParty
PRP
Issue Category: Site Access/Security
Issue: Deteriorated signs on fenceRecommendation: Replace with new signs.

Issue Category; Operations and Maintenance
Issue: Animal burrowing at few locationsRecommendation: Continue repairs, as needed, and poison bait placements.

Issue Category: Operations and MaintenanceIssue: Unused, on-site water well Recommendation: Properly destroy
i-i.
।।
None
Issues and Recommendations identified in the Five Year R i
!
।
I
Issues and Recommendations Identified in the Five-YearReview OU(s): 1
Recommendation: Reduce final remediation goal for chloroform in groundwater to 80 ug/L
Oversight Party Milestone Date
No Yes State Immediately
I
i
I
Title 3
I
Sitewide Protectiveness Statement (if applicable)
Affect Future
Protectiveness
Affect Current
Protectiveness
Issue Category: Remedy Performanceissue: Reduced chloroform MCL For sites that have achieved construction completion, enter a sitewide protectiveness determinationand statement.

Protectiveness Statement:

The Final Remedy is functioning as intended and remains protective of human health and the environment.

Protectiveness Determination:

Protective
Addendum Due Date (if applicable):

Click here to enter date.

Implementing
Party
PRP
I-
I
I
Title 4
i
| I।i
i
IAPPENDIX B

SELECTED FIGURES FROM FINAL RAP
N 8 8w
£ 5 *
II I I
I
o toaosi 60F
i !
i L
—
N IC—— 1 Lum soo Are
/ 1 (
I
JUMP M
N Kd>
LES-M:

ARE. OF EXOAVATION
- -1204 DRAINALE im DEMCLISHEO STRUCTUE
i
BYaTe4 A waldi sael.l
[a 1

EXLAVATIN
te oaem) r ESTNS STRUCTURE
N Rd----- O I
o-Stns
|
IIEL
GSTaRN
E Lenog bark
N 700-- SUMP EP T
E
st 2l— FORN EMPLOYEE
—Y/ SHOW A»
W 400—

LLNKH ROOM

TECTICN WELL
JoTROYED)
DRAINAGE ■
SY8TEA B

EXCAVATION
or
“L
DRAJAGE 1(sePnO TA
6 OOMPAR)
-WDOERGROLHD
STORADE_TAN
tt-surg
Med WMMa

DRAINAGE
SYSTEM F-*
LAOMLL.

EXGAVATWN
-NORTHEAST

SHALLOWEXCAVATION
Twe-Biay,
e d Gang
o o0

RAILROAD
EXCAVATION —
kcoonyona
SASEMP RFERDM$
wucunso rhou s "tcPomATHC suer a
A Foirt DF EECTDi 38, TO5, RgE.MA&M,
FOA THMPEO HAYVAPD ClIIGAL". WO OENTRYLATUREYOP, FESAL, SSTOM. ■ APAI t8z.

Mn 2 PL TOchATC veT)LS FROM AEMAt. PHOTOCAAFH T.kil t2-N-en. AA PHDTOMETPN. F TSm, DALrcrega.

Suuree:

Remedial investigstion Summary Report,
Kundy,Janks ConsultantsMay, 1993
K/J 844083.75
May 199
Fgure 3-2
seFTic TANK
(ADAWOMED AND FEEOWITH GGNCNETE IN W70)—

1. TH Se.T TANK ADJACENT TO DRAINAGE

SYSTEM C WAS ABANDONED AND FILLED
WITH CONCRETE N S70, ALL OTHER TANKS
AN am ERNS EXCEFT LRADACE SYSTEM F
HAVE BEN REMOVEL.

E. AREAS WHERE EXCAVATIONS OVERLA

MDIOATE THAT ONE EXOAVATION PROCEEDED DEEPER THAN IF OTHER, Raalence Pent R --------------
LE__9
] : From ed /
Exlating and Demolished Site
Festrs and Exeavation Locations

NORTHEAST
SUMP

EXCAVATION
—SPTiC Turhar Moranznasa
... TANtt...________________
oranus
—^SYSTEM 0
— [
TEM D
MITH
[ LOADI
I DOCK

J EXOAVATION
onees AW OmON TAMO
1 MPeSHAE
GA"t SALE M FEET
toasrii® SEPTIC TAR
Oft CISTERNDEMOUSED OR ABAGGE CISTERNS, TANKS, SUMP

AND WELL
_ Kennedy lenks Consultants
THAN, Eesiemn Fresno County, CA
Draft Remedial Aciion Par
1 w
I

DRADBACE
y SYSTEM C
*• (2 CISTERNS),
: iny.
, , Mokee/ci
55 BALOH ; : BiB $
ON ! ! “• i
p- DRANAOE
/ 9TSTEM ■
T*U0Gfn
1 2 8 ?
1 i
I
9 10 233 SCFT,
N 10go— East Mekiley Ayarm
A Pcarion OF —DM TE? RMBA M
II
-.6
N 1—
LEGEND:

Duso STAGTLRE 1
(22 comn= PA®m AREA
W 600-
f
Dock
GF
N 70-
st 000—
L
ond-trory
Mnid worehoune
PLP
House
saseP REPCPENDESwoorID fv . "oPOMRsPHC znr o
FoR nostn terwano DDPOAL. w.o, CF(iLO sutErc*. FrETE, GLFCNg*A 5 PFR 252, pp 2) ‘HHGETFn MEDDOS F’DM AEP A.

PHOTOGUM TAKE 12-H-H4’ AFPLI, PJTOMETHCS FFESNO, CALIFOa, KM 844083,76
May 1099
Figure 3-3
Exisling Sile Structures
and PavedAreas
N
Rolrence Prbel
NK. E000—
T
KennedylJenksConsuliant
THAN, Essiem Fresne Coury, C
Dren FemnetsalAclion RM

APPRXATE
enipis SCME N FEET
I s
I
Sourer:

Herediel Investigation Summary Repuri,
Kennedy Janks Consultpnte
Msy, 1882
! (
M: |
? N & § 88 8
1 1 I
I I
E I 2D 30
=
N ‘000— A Lost MeKruLg Areun
1 M
Th
tr
a E 6% d 9 %X X X X
XX 09 LP O 0, E t.
r eLonars oock
C
lt
y DEMOLISEO STRUCTURE
a aK— □ G D tX X, EXSTIG STRUCTURE
n Trester,
0 I’ ■
Erier sueing
X Bart a LOCATION r □
+ 5.
□ a”
XX
YP"orof a Q X X
I too- E
+ EISTNB MOMTORNG WEL
E
-3 B ? K. X Ex
0 □ YAPDR EXTACTION WELL
E — X I
Li
X e % X
24 TOO— 2 a*
X E%
or-afor S e X X
• on"
-
X
n
□ *
Foos x*x X X X; Sib
i •
B x aik x X +x. X *
I
LEOAND
•]
iII i
J l
«
a
5 s
X
n
□
X
CENTER de COMPOSITESOIL SAMPLE LOCATION
Ralercze Per
N too, 5:00:

MOHITOFIIN wax NO

LDNGEB W SERVICE
Boring, Soll Sample, MAcmitoring and
Vapor Extraction Wall Locations

UNEXOAVATED GRAB WL

SAMPLE LOGATION
KJ 544083.75
MAny1999
Figure 14
x
Ont-Stam
Trba Yererguse
i*PATE
GRAPE B2 I 1 FEET
n‘
MASEWP trerNet
Meeruer. ATOW I *oFOCAAP)I,. S.RE* 2
4 FORTON CF BEOTCN 3$. T(s, Ra. Mr: i I,
FOR THPGN HAYWAR CHEMICAL," T “ERYFTLAD SUETOR FEONO. CALMFOR 5 ap"r, IBTE, A € "V2OTOORMLMETRD METHOPS FAC ' RENiHDTOSAPr! ZAREN 12=U-0a‘ fEMLML PMC satitrs, FRENNo, &JFCTIA.

SuA are. BCM,
SAMPLE LOCAT.ON
] } hem an
r=
a ’
e
l
a
xa
5,
•2
r” .

D.
**f o‘ : Kennedy/Jenks Connutants
THAF, EusiemFrosnn Counly. CA
Draf Remedial Action Pian
Source:

Remedial Investigstion Summary Report,
Kerned ly/enks Consultunts
May, 1993
„FF
2: FL
: .e ersta.
• PP
rP
D
□
‘•,oT "7 Feoe 117-------------
a "• o a a
a
° de .€ 5 #* s -------- 1.4 r
%*‘
Bhl
X X
X
NOTE>________________________ ____

L COMPOSITE BOL SAMPLES COLLEGTED

FROM THE EXPLORATORY TRENCHES
FOR THE Mae LAM* U EXCAVAT.CN
ARE HOT SHOWN.
“1s
o ' * X • X O X
> G
%a A
*• is
N 8 3 8 8 8 3
I 1 I I I
I
J 1
N 12*:— Ect MaKsing, AculoA
10 1 (
1 ft 4 Lrcdng Do.

N 000- 1 p__ J
Pup. HMM[
Bkk Balsk
i mf. □ LEOENO:

Ah
I-r
SC]
----- DEMOLSHO STRUCTURE
I so
I.LL.______ ------------ J EXSTING STRUCTURE H'
f I OMI/g t
Nen----

EXSTIS MONITORIND WEL,

PLANT SUPPLY WELL
Dook
N T0D-
[TF ‘7-1
On-Btr A
■1
rod, 3 1 2 J Sub J
N 4 — —+ Ha 1 KmamnedylJants Consulas
TMAN, Enslem Freano v ay cA
Drat Remedal Action Pion
Onsite Monitoring Walls
I
Aaleren Pr.fN ICcr. E00Oi
l

MONITOFNG WELL NO

LONGER N SEAVIDE
WJ 844083.75
May 1999
Figur3-5
BASEM4: REFEREWCS,
woorE rean p‘ “TOPDDRAPHC whveror
$ FORTE oF at cTir SS. TLs, hhE, MDDRAM
For THOMPS0N MAYNARD CHENECAL w 3. D"*arLAN BIVEYOR FRESNO, CLFONA $ & F-2 wo th PYDTOCMACTP0 MEals FRC A£?L ‘
PHOTusR. Taken 12-1-04". ADL PHOTOMETC: FFd. MOR’A
t
o
sprnomene
GAPAC SALE E. FEET
NOTES* ________ _—
L WELL 904 HAS SOLD casne TO 92 FEET
BELOW GRpuO SURFAGE 180e AND IS AN
GFEN HOLE TO 105 FLET BOS
------f......
r....
n ‘n
..... ---3 S B
T
Source:

Remedial Investigation Summary Report, KenadyiJanks Consuhants Msy, 1993
_ Li2____ Li.

Le.m.
r
§ N
8 3 8 i
I 1 1
0 40 20 30 TF
L.
—
H 10c—— Etm Magtg Ateue
1 (
I
X SLMP: -NORTHEAST *— — RECTION WELL

DESTROYED)
LFOHR:
! wr.

AREA OF EXCAVATION
= i
>-r'

DEMOLISHC STRUCTURE
1 T [oa
: me ; A
----- LJ
tJ EXISTING JTRUOTURE
-
I
3) 5
N UCo— O
ora-Bleny
NOJE: 1

ORTWIN,
B Uok
R
SUMP
EF T
K 700—
(o),
: she , L
M «oa—
i
Tu-$ur,
a* Quneng
DRAMAOr
tano t
6 OPPAR

DAAIE -
SYSTEM a
EXCAVATINRALRDAD

EXCAVATION

DRAINAGE
STBTEM FLNOFLL

EXCAVATION
Rafesssee Pelt
A Aad, E00O-
#94 DRAINAGE BYeTE A EXDAVATKON
SHPLLO

EXCAVATION
K/J 844063,75
May 1999
Figure 3-2

SEPTIC TANK
Aroep AW FUH J‘
WITH GOMONETE * wADICeo-Siore
bud Wirecans
-serTc Thhe *”«««»
TANKS
noRamuase
— SYSTEM G

EXIITINO SEPTIC TANK
OR CISTERN□EMtlStD OR ABANDONED□STERNS, TAMKS, SUP

AMI WELL

L TH SEPTIC TANK ADJACENT TO DRAINAGE
SYSTEM O WAS ABANDONED AND FIXED WH CONCRETE IN BTO. ALL OTHER TAMO

AND CTERB EXEPI UFAINACE STBTBA F

HAVE SEEN REMOVED,
• AREAS WHERE EXAATIDN OVERLAP

MICATE THAT ONE EXCAVATION PROCEEDED
DEEPER THAN iP OTHER
-NORTHEAST
SLAP

EXCAVATION
T

FORMER EMPLOYEESHOWE AND
LNOH ROOM Existing and Demolished aits
Features and Excavatien Localions
fTEM D
WITH
f SYSTEM O
.ss 2 GsTer)
NremtluinE
GRASMC SGALE ifEer
Lonmg M
Kennedy Jenks Consultants
THAN, Eastern Fmno County, cA
Draf Remedial Aclin Part
■ss OALLOHI ; miki
"M i .2.;
[ LOADING
| DOCK

I EOAVATION
ouvoun AND GON TANC8
(e GaTerat) ...
1 ......._
Suurce:

Ramadinl Investigation Summary Rsport,
Kemedy,Janks Consultants
May, 1893
UERRQuDSTORAOH-IANK
_LG
i; From M
BASEMA® ReFEOK:]
MobO racu s "RPOCAAPWC suey o
A PDNLON oF SESTEN 38. TOS, R2E, MDB&.

FOA THOMPSch MATWJPD GGMIDAL", W.O. ANTRLIM SUAeY11, FHEAM, GlFOPNL % wFvin. th47.

Ao 2 ‘PWTOGATEE VTHons FROM PNA
PHOTORAFB TAXEN 2-#144" FENA. PrDToMETRCS. F’SSM, GALonna. g
s

F-ORANAGE
/ STSTEM E ELEAGFD)
M
I
Date
Sampled
25-Jun-90
2-Oct-90
10-Dec-90
1 O-Mar-91
7-J un-91
10-Sep-91
17-Dec-91
27-Mar-92
25-Jun-92
17-Sep-92
16-Dec-92
19-Mar-93
16-Jun-93
24-Sep-93
9-Dec-93
3-Mar-94
9-Jun-94
14-Sep-94
6-Dec-94
4-Apr-95
19-Oct-95 19-Oct-95
16-Apr-96
27-Jun-96
27-Jun-96
5-Sep-96
5-Sep-96
ll-May-97
6-Dec-97
19-Oct-95 19-Oct-95
30-Jul-87
15-Apr-88
15-Apr-88
15-Jul-88
17-Oct-88
18-Sep-89
5-Sep-96
3-Dec-98
18-J un-99
18-Dec-99
29-Apr-OO
24-Oct-OO
13-Apr-Ol
30-Sep-01
Well
Name 153-C1 153-C1 153-C1
153-C1 153-C1
153-C1 153-C1 153-C1 153-C1 153-C1 153-C1 153-C1 153-C1 153-C1
153-C1 153-C1
153-C1 153-C1
153-C1 153-C1
153-C1 153-C1
153-C1
153-C1 153-C1 153-C1
153-C1
153-C1 153-C1 153-C1 153-C1 153-C1 153-C1
153-C1 153-C1 153-C1
153-C1 154-B1 154-B1 154-B1 154-B1 154-B1
154-B1 154-B1 154-B1
CompoundDBCP

DBCP DBCP

DBCP DBCP DBCP

DBCP DBCP DBCP DBCP DBCP DBCP DBCP

DBCP DBCP

DBCP DBCPDBCP
DBCP

DBCP DBCP DBCP DBCP DBCP
DBCP

DBCP DBCP DBCP DBCP
DCPA acid metabolites
DCPA acid metabolites
Di-n-butylphthalate
Di-n-butylphthalate
Di-n-butylphthalate
Di-n-butylphthalate Di-n-butylphthalate
Scan #664
1,2,3-Trichloropropane 1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 1,2,3-Trichloropropane Concentration
(ug/L)

3.815.604.803.80

2.80 4.80

4.1 3.44.4

4.9 4.0

3.73.5 3.96

3.23.2 3.22.4

4.2 3.42.1

2.72.5 2.01.9

2.5 2.58

1.4 1.2

0.24 0.19

34.0042.2073.80
109.00

66.00 6.00

0.04 0.040.04

0.05 0.050.040.04

0.04 APPENDIX C

HISTORICAL CHEMICAL DETECTIONS IN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES
T H Agriculture and Nutrition Site, Fresno County, CA

Date
Sampled
17-Feb-02
30-Jul-02
10-Feb-03
14-Sep-03
16-M ay-04
7-Dec-04
6-Aug-05
18-Dec-05
13-May-06
13-Dec-06
12-May-07
26-Sep-07
4-May08
14-Jun 09
13-Dec-92 30-Sep-01
30-Jul-87
4-NOV-87
15-Jan-88
15-Apr-88
15-Jul-88
15-Jul-88
17-Oct-88
17-Oct-88
3-Jan-89 3-Jan-89
12-Jun-89
18-Sep-89 18-Dec-89
27-Mar-90
25-Jun-90
2-Oct-90
10-Dec-90
10-Mar-91
5-Jun-91
10-Sep-91 15-Dec-91
24-Mar-92
24-Jun-92
16-Sep-92
13-Dec-92
16-Mar-93
13-Jun-93
21-Sep-93
6-Dec-93
Well
Name 154-B1
154-B1 154-B1 154-B1
154-B1 154-B1
154-B1
154-B1 154-B1 154-B1154-B1
154-B1
154-B1 154-B1 154-B1 154-B1154-Bl 154-B1 154-B1 154-B1
154-B1 154-B1154-B1 154-B1 154-B1154-B1 154-B1 154-B1 154-B1 154-B1 154-B1 154-B1 154-B1 154-B1
154-B1
154-B1 154-B1154-B1 154-B1
154-B1 154-B1
154-B1 154-B1 154-B1
154-B1
Compound
1,2,3-Trichloropropane 1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 1,2,3-Trichloropropane Chloromethane Chloromethane

DBCPDBCP DBCP DBCP
DBCP

DBCP DBCP DBCP
DBCP
DBCP
DBCP

DBCP DBCP DBCP DBCP
DBCP

DBCP DBCP DBCP DBCP DBCP DBCP

DBCP DBCP
DBCP
DBCP
DBCP
DBCP
DBCP
Concentration
(ug/L)

0.05 0.050.07

0.080.13

0.0880.089

0.140.13

0.097 Y

0.10 0.08

0.0550.032,

1.6 0.39 J

0.05 ‘0.16

0.130.270.200.25

0.04 0.04

0.040.060.04

0.460.23

0.070.090.13

0.170.180.140.100.180.12

0.090.13

0.110.120.090.06

0.05 APPENDIX C

HISTORICAL CHEMICAL DETECTIONS IN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES
T H Agriculture and Nutrition Site, Fresno County, CA

Date
Sampled
l-Mar-94
6-J un-94
13-Sep-94
5-Dec-94
3-Apr-95
15-Jan-88
17-Oct-88
12-Jun-89
10-Dec-90
6-Dec-97
16-J un-98
3-Dec-98
18-J un-99
18-Dec-99
29-Apr-00
24-Oct-OO 13-Apr-Ol
30-Sep-01
17-Feb-02
30-Jul-02
10-Feb-03
14-Sep-03
16-May-04
7-Dec-04
6-Aug-05
18-Dec-05
13-May-06
13-Dec-06
12-May-07
26-Sep-07
4-M ay-08 14-J un-09
23-J un-10
20-Jul-ll
16-May-12
10-Dec-90
30-Jul-87
25-Jun-90
30-Sep-01
3 O-Jul-87
4-Nov-87
15-Jan-88 15-Jan-88
15-Apr-88
15-Apr-88
Well
Name 154-B1
154-B1
154-B1
154-Bl 154-B1 154-B1
154-B1
154-B1 154-B1 154-C1 154-C1 154-C1
154-C1
154-C1
154-C1
154-C1
154-C1
154-C1 154-C1 154-C1
154-C1
154-C1
154-C1
154-C1 154-C1 154-C1 154-C1 154-Cl
154-Cl
154-Cl 154-Cl
154-Cl
154-Cl
154-Cl 154-Cl 154-Cl
154-Cl 154-Cl 154-Cl
154-Cl 154-Cl
154-Cl
154-Cl 154-Cl 154-Cl
Compound

DBCPDBCPDBCPDBCPDBCP
Di-n-butylphthalate
Di-n-butylphthalate
Di-n-butylphthalate Trifluralin1,2,3-Trichloropropane 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 1,2,3-Trichloropropane1,2,3-Trichloropropane 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 1,2,3-Trichloropropane1,2,3-Trichloropropane 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 1,2,3-Trichloropropane1,2,3-Trichloropropane 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane1,2,3-Trichloropropane1,2,3-Trichloropropane 1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE 1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE
Aldrin
Butylbenzylphthalate
Chloroform
ChloromethaneDBCPDBCP

DBCPDBCPDBCP
DBCP
Concentration
(ug/L)

0.01 0.02

0.03 0.02 0.02

6.20 60.00

27.60 0.50 0.05

0.04 0.04

0.04 0.05 0.04 0.03

0.05 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.07

0.07 0.061

0.055 0.055

0.60 0.054 Y

0.068 0.036

0.07 0.06

0.047

0.041

0.029

0.09 306.00

1.90 0.58

0.32 0.45 0.21

0.23 0.26 0.26

APPENDIX C

HISTORICAL CHEMICAL DETECTIONS IN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES
T H Agriculture and Nutrition Site, Fresno County, CA

Date
Sampled
15-Jul-88
17-Oct-88
3-Jan-89
12-J un-89
18-Sep-89
18-Dec-89
27-Mar-90
25-Jun-90
2-Oct-90
10-Dec-90
10-Mar-91
10-Mar-91
5-Jun-91
10-Sep-91
15-Dec-91
24-Mar-92
24-J un-92
16-Sep-92
13-Dec-92
16-Mar-93
13-J un-93
21-Sep-93
6-Dec-93
l-Mar-94
6-J un-94
13-Sep-94
5-Dec-94
3-Apr-95
16-Oct-95
15-Apr-96 24-Jun-96
7-May-97
6-Dec-97
16-J un-98
3-Dec-98
18-Jun-99
18-Dec-9929-Apr-OO24-Oct-OO
30-Sep-01
17-Feb-02
30-Jul-02
14-Sep-03
16-May-04
30-Jul-87
Well
Name 154-C1
154-C1
154-C1 154-C1 154-C1
154-C1
154-C1
154-C1 154-C1
154-C1
154-C1
154-C1
154-C1 154-C1 154-C1 154-C1
154-C1 154-C1
154-C1 154-C1
154-C1 154-C1 154-C1 154-Cl
154-Cl 154-Cl
154-Cl 154-Cl
154-Cl 154-Cl 154-Cl 154-Cl
154-Cl 154-Cl
154-Cl 154-Cl
154-Cl 154-Cl 154-Cl 154-Cl
154-Cl
154-Cl
154-Cl 154-Cl
154-Cl
CompoundDBCP DBCP DBCP DBCP

DBCP DBCPDBCP DBCP DBCP DBCP DBCP DBCPDBCP DBCP DBCP

DBCP DBCP DBCP
DBCP

DBCP DBCP
DBCP
DBCP

DBCP DBCP
DBCP
DBCP

DBCP DBCP DBCP DBCP

DBCP DBCP

DBCP DBCP
DBCP

DBCP DBCP DBCP DBCP DBCP
DBCP
DBCP DBCP Di-n-butylphthalate
Concentration
(ug/L)

0.450.21

0.12 0.190.320.170.100.120.18

0.15 0.13

0.130.130.090.150.10

0.140.13

0.15 0.130.100.14

0.13 0.14

0.12 0.09

0.100.110.08

0.07 0.07

0.070.10

0.04 0.030.030.02

0.03 0.016 J

0.02 J0.01 J

0.01 J0.01 J

0.01 J
522.00

APPENDIX C

HISTORICAL CHEMICAL DETECTIONS IN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES
T H Agriculture and Nutrition Site, Fresno County, CA

Date
Sampled 15-Jul-88
12-Jun-89
10-Dec-90 10-Dec-90
17-Oct-88
10-Sep-91 10-Sep-91
17-Oct-88 17-Oct-88
10-Sep-91 10-Sep-91 10-Sep-91
17-Oct-88 17-Oct-88
6-Jun-91
9-M ay-97
5-Dec-97 3-Dec-98
20-Jun-99
1-May-00
23-Oct-00 18-Feb-02 18-Feb-02 15-Sep-03
17-May-04
6-Dec-04
8-Aug-05
19-Dec-05 14-Dec-06
23-Jun-92
23-Sep-93
18-Oct-95
5-Dec-97 3-Dec-98
23-Oct-OO
1-Oct-Ol
29-Jul-02
6-Dec-04
17-Oct-88
3-Jan-89
12-J un-89
18-Sep-89
18-Dec-89
5-Dec-97
3-Jan-89
Well
Name
154-C1 154-C1 154-C1 154-C1 155-Al 155-Al 155-Al 155-Al 155-Al 155-Al 155-Al 155-Al 155-Al 155-Al 155-BO
155-BO 155-BO 155-BO 155-BO 155-BO 155-BO 155-BO 155-BO 155-BO 155-BO 155-BO 155-BO 155-BO 155-BO 155-BO 155-BO 155-BO 155-BO 155-BO 155-BO 155-BO 155-BO 155-BO 155-BO 155-BO 155-BO 155-BO 155-BO 155-BO 155-BO
Compound
Di-n-butylphthalate Di-n-butylphthalate Heptachlor
Trifluralin
1,2-Dichloroethane b-BHC Bromacil
Chloroform

DBCP DBCP
d-BHC
DieldrinDi-n-butylphthalate Dinoseb (DNBP)
1,2,3-Trichloropropane 1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 1,2,3-Trichloropropane1,2,3-Trichloropropane 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 1,2,3-Trichloropropane1,2,3-Trichloropropane 4,4'-TDE/DDD
Bromacil BromacilBromacilBromacilBromacil
BromacilBromacilBromacil
Chloroform Chloroform Chloroform ChloroformChloroform
Dalapon DBCP
Concentration
(ug/L)

23.20 29.40

0.06 0.93

2.30 0.48

1.00 200.00

0.16 0.02 0.16 0.07

30.00 1.20

0.50 0.08 0.05 0.03 0.03

0.02 J

0.010 J

0.02 J 0.02 J

0.03 0.03 0.02

0.021 0.028 0.021

0.10 B

0.6 J 0.9 J

0.4 J 0.3 J
6 8.73.1

1.7 3.20

18.00 14.00

1.40 0.70

1.0 Y

0.03 APPENDIX C

HISTORICAL CHEMICAL DETECTIONS IN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES
T H Agriculture and Nutrition Site, Fresno County, CA

URS
August 15,2016
Re:

Dear Mr. Domingo:

KNProjects THAN Site-18715256 7.0 Deli werables\2016 Well Decom Wkpin Wkp This workplan for decommissioning of 16 groundwater monitoring wells at and near the abovereferenced site was prepared by URS Corporation (URS) on behalf of Philips Electronics North America Corporation (Client), which is the responsible party for the site. The site location is shown on Figure 1. As approved by you in a letter dated 30 October 2015, the current groundwater monitoring program includes 27 monitoring wells and 6 domestic wells. On an annual basis, the depth to groundwater is measured in all of the monitoring wells, and groundwater samples are collected from 12 of the monitoring wells and from all 6 of the domestic wells. The remaining 15 monitoring wells in the program that are not routinely sampled annually are available for contingency sampling in the event that any unusual analytical results are obtained for the wells that are sampled. Well construction details and the planned annual monitoring program are summarized on Table 1. Well locations for on-site/near-site wells are shown on Figure 2, and for the off-site wells are shown on Figure 3.

In addition to the 27 monitoring wells included in the current groundwater monitoring program discussed above, there are 16 extra monitoring wells that were previously included in the monitoring program but are no longer used. These 16 monitoring wells are no longer needed, because the 15 contingency-sampling wells in the current monitoring program are sufficient in the event that any unusual analytical results are obtained for the wells that are sampled annually. Well construction details for the 16 unused monitoring wells are summarized on Table 2, and the well locations are shown on Figures 2 and 3. This workplan sets forth proposed methods to decommission these 16 unused groundwater monitoring wells.

Danny G. Domingo, PGBrownfields and Environmental Restoration Program California Department of Toxic Substances Control
1515 Tollhouse Road
Clovis, CA 93611
Workplan for Decommissioning of 16 Monitoring WellsT H Agriculture & Nutrition Site7183 East McKinley AvenueFresno County, California (URS Job No. 60494324)
URS Corporation
1360 E. Spruce Avenue, Suite 101
Fresno, CA 93720
Tel: 559-448-8222Fax: 559-448-8233
URS

PROPOSED WELL DECOMMISSIONING METHODS

PROPOSED REPORTING AND SCHEDULE
KPrjectsTHAN Site-18715256.7.0 Deliverables\2016Well Decom Wkpln Wkpi After the 16 wells have been destroyed, a brief letter report will be prepared to document the well decommissioning methods. The report will include California Well Completion Reports (WCRs), signed by the water well contractor, for each of the monitoring wells. The WCRs will also be submitted to the California Department of Water Resources (DWR), as required by California law.

The only investigation-derived waste (IDW) that will be generated will be the uppermost 5 feet of casing from each well, and the surface completion vaults/monuments with surrounding concrete and bollards. This IDW will be properly disposed of off-site in accordance with all applicable legal requirements. Any soil cuttings generated will be returned to the hole as backfill material.Each well will be sealed by filling the well casing from the bottom to within about 5-feet below ground surface (bgs) with neat cement (5.2 gallons of water per 94-pound sack of cement). Tremie pipe/hose will be lowered into the well casing to within the screened interval. The neat cement will be pumped through the tremie pipe/hose using a viscous-fluid pump. The well casing will be removed to a depth of about 5-feet bgs by over-drilling with auger. A “mushroom cap” of cement will be placed over foe remaining sealed well casing. Then, the hole will be filled with compacted, native-type soil material up to approximately flush with the surrounding grade.

Upon your approval of this workplan, die bidding process for selecting a licensed contractor will require one to two weeks, followed by a few days for the permitting and USA underground utility notification process. The wells will then be destroyed at foe earliest opportunity given previously scheduled work for the contractor and URS staff. The letter report should be submitted to DTSC within one to two weeks after the field work is completed.

Danny G. Domingo, PGDTSC
The 16 unused groundwater monitoring wells listed on Table 2 will be destroyed (sealed and decommissioned) in accordance with California’s Water Well Standards (Department of Water Resources Bulletins 74-81 and 74-90) by a California C-57 licensed water well contractor. The following tasks will be completed prior to beginning work in the field:
• Permission for access will be obtained from the property owners.• Well destruction permits will be obtained from the Fresno County Department of Public Health, Environmental Health Division.
• Notification will be supplied to Underground Service Alert of Northern California and Nevada (USA) at least 48 hours in advance of any intrusive work.

August 15,2016

URS
Jult.
t
.C €0945 20
Stuart B. St. Clair, PE t
Project Civil EngineerAttachments: Figures 1 - 3 and Tables 1-2 c: Shau-Luen Barker, Philips Electronics North America Corporation, Lenexa, KS KAProjectsTHAN Site-187152567.0 Deliverables2016\Well Decom WkplWkp Frank L. Gegunde, PG
Senior Geologist
Sincerely,
URS Corporation
Danny G. Domingo, PG
DTSCThank you very much for your assistance with this matter. We look forward to your approval of this workplan at your earliest opportunity. Please do not hesitate to contact Stuart St. Clair at (559) 490- 8308 if you have any questions or comments.

August 15,2016

67.QG
oPROFESSo,, AgBRlAN,,
&s
A X MML OrcAuOS
Mkhq/zo
Golonny
11 I
-1.
1 It
/
5 te.
7 S
Td. ------- .. . . - . 2
Legend
I 1 Parcel Boundary
• Site Boundary
X
*
—
L
"Redding
-"ncragd
(fan Franc)
isno
Bakersfiel Location ‘
a Los Angeles
7 (
Sita.3"
—tioni, •*
Source: NAIP Imagery, 2010
URS
Site Location Map
T H Agriculture & Nutrition Site
Fresno County, California
Figure 1
8 , j
aa.
o
3 t
1 2 N.
. -
-V% 1 * 1
o
■
SMsr &
7 y
1 r
.9 •f
IF
*
5 4=
I 7,
h- *
S IA *•**
Vaopamazcxa
1 p
i
i
l
1 . 1
1 :
444
‘ 9 r.
—====*
A--------- A--------- 2-
*
149-2P44,"
x
+$-155-A1,B0 SITE
155-14 077-A,B1 X1
L.__,c—x- J
T
i
i
1 i
i
Pine
....... /
.8.

L/
151-Al,Blcl4
25*3
32-A,Ba+, Th
"—**a9.N3l
150-B1.C1
—-
29-B
30—A.B
4 i
0 130 300 FEET
LEGEND;
-X ■■ X - X4 Ground water Monitoring Well
MUI Ditch
; 154-Al ,B1,C1
THAN Property Boundary
Site Boundary (Fence)
McKinley
8 -
i
Floradora
$

ON-SITE AND NEAR-SITE WELL LOCATION MAP
URS Job 60404324 sas 2016 Wei Mr Wkpin Fig 283.wg 07-20-2016 T H Agriculture & Nutrition Site
Fresno County, California
FIGURE 2
947
... 939
iss-AL.Bo,I •
SIIE 29-B
151-A11CI
$150-M1.c
3015/
152-A1BL01
28__!
.. 0199
; O
30890 i o
o :

A99.—
_Q99
303a
Q.1
7153-
o i
3003
3027
-8—3020
s8Ra"8s&
“hM’a ; i 13002/3022. -----
94 03 * -
9400
.SP.......S4R-B.
923 ;
O ’
i
|
3007 >
o .
| 9780,
0% 0936 :9330
--0934.. .
\
MIU Ditoh
154-ALBL.Cl
McKinlay |
993
30%
90300 1
"...... 932 ’
Floradord
1040 O
LEGEND:
-x0
4- Groundwater Monitoring Well
THAN Property Boundary
Site Boundary (Fence)
Domestic Well
30210
Gu
974 1
“8 .Q2
■i
! !
i
Jo ‘8-
9sep... | 9. O
976
[O O
! 971
Q901...
a%
‘Cox. loo, 87 •!
! ea : i I :
950.
10410
!= \
I \
I C
998
‘8o
1009
970
o o
1037
Harvey 184-B1c,m O
% .9907
%h,,
"out,.
%4 ।
Olive
MOI Men
01017
1017—’—IF"——T'—•—~
vsi ) |
' 9/T=!!
—/T
-X l i \ .. //
1 i
3025
“6o”doloog d ° 1005 962 963.....4
s08s
o i a82)—..
r
go1/8%%. 1021 | 11201
O
8 bP84 C
981-A
i
|
I I \ _L
_MR?Q..
91 0 480 see FEET
025 i0260 i Belmont
i
i
i
i
i
o
983
iIT
o
1024
—w.‘8B"porao ’ 1003 o
c
i l ads
“81 o i
sone i
n42€
30130
384
Q ■
1027
|
i
i
URS J-580494324 SBS 2016 Wen Deatr Wkpin Figs 23.dm 07-20-2018

OFF-SITE WELL LOCATION MAP
T H Agriculture & Nutrition Site
_ Fresno County, California
T FIGURE 3
T
of of M
i
l
FoWler
-o"
8 8...

8...
■ 80 # |
so ! o#b8g
S ............?| Ifo.
! go
L
।
Planned Annual Monitoring
310-062-0829-B PVC PVC X
77-A Monitoring 310-062-09 4 PVC SS 0.010 48 X
77-B1 310-062-09Monitoring 4 PVC SS 0.010 97 X
150-B1 Monitoring 310-062-08 4 SS SS 0.010 92 X X150-C1 Monitoring 310-062-08 4 SS SS 0.010 157 X X151-A1 Monitoring 310-062-08 4 SS X39.5 XSS 0.010151-B1 Monitoring 310-062-08 4 SS SS 0.010 90 X X 151-C1 Monitoring 310-062-08 4 SS SS 0.020 153 X X
154-A1 Monitoring 310-052-27 4 SS SS 39 X0.010 X
154-B1 4 SS310-052-27Monitoring SS 0.010 92 X X
Monitoring154-C1 310-052-27 4 SS SS 0.020 152 X X
155-A1 Monitoring 310-062-09 5 SSSS 0.008 45 X155-BO Monitoring 310-062-09 5 SS SS 82.5 X0.008 155-C1 Monitoring 310-062-08 4 PVC SS 0.010 158 X181-B1 310-081-07 PVC4 SS 0.010 93 X181-CO 310-081-07 4 PVC 160 XSS 0.010181-01 Monitoring 310-081-07 4 PVC SS 0.010 213.5 X 182-B1 Monitoring 310-220-29S 4 PVC SS 0.010 90 X
182-C1 310-220-29SMonitoring 4 PVC SS 0.010 170 X182-01 Monitoring 310-220-295 4 PVC SS 0.010 217 X 183-B1 Monitoring 310-062-25 4 PVC SS 92 0.010 X X183-B2 Monitoring 4 PVC310-062-25 SS 0.010 113 X 183-C1 Monitoring 310-062-25 4 PVC SS 0.010 170 X183-D1 310-062-25Monitoring 4 PVC SS 0.010 201 X 184-B1 Monitoring 310-132-27 4 PVC SS 0.010 100 X
184-C1 Monitoring 310-132-27 4 PVC SS 0.010 160 X X184-D1 Monitoring 4 PVC310-132-27 SS 0.010 203 X X 1017 310-143-01Domestic n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a X
3022 310-062-45Domestic n/a n/an/a n/a n/a X
3025 Domestic 310-180-11 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a X3026 Domestic n/a n/a310-180-10 n/a n/a n/a X 3027 Domestic 310-062-66 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a X3029 Domestic 310-062-67 n/a n/a n/a n/a X n/a MonitoringMonitoring
Casing
Material
Screen
Material
Well
Name
Slot Size
(Inches)

0.020
Assessor's
Parcel
Number
Measure
Depth to
Groundwater
Well
Type
Monitoring
Well
Total Depth
(ft btoc)
121
Casing
Diameter
(Inches)
2 NOTES;
Wells that are not regularly sampled annually are available for contingency sampling if unusual analytical results are obtained from other wells. ft btoc = feet below top of casing
n/a = not availablePVC = polyvinyl chloride
SS = stainless steel
Sample
Groundwater
X
TABLE 1

CURRENT GROUNDWATER MONITORING PROGRAM
T H Agriculture and Nutrition Site
Fresno County, CA

30-A Monitoring PVC 310-062-08 PVC 52
30-B Monitoring 310-062-08 2 PVC PVC 0.020 12131-A Monitoring 310-062-08 2 PVC PVC 0.020 52 31-B Monitoring 310-062-08 2 PVC PVC 0.020 120
32-A Monitoring 310-062-08 2 PVC PVC 0.020 5232-B Monitoring 310-062-08 2 PVC PVC 0.020 122 138 Monitoring 310-062-08 4 PVC PVC 0.020 41139 Monitoring PVC 310-062-08 4 PVC 0.020 46 149-B1 Monitoring 310-062-08 4 SS SS 0.010 89
149-C1 Monitoring 310-062-08 4 SS SS 0.020 155152-A1 Monitoring 310-062-59 4 SS SS 0.010 39 152-B1 Monitoring 310-062-59 4 SS SS 0.010 93
152-C1 Monitoring 310-062-59 4 SS SS 0.020 157153-A1 Monitoring 310-062-56 4 SS SS 0.010 39153-B1 Monitoring 310-062-56 4 SS SS 0.010 90153-C1 310-062-56Monitoring 4 SS SS 0.020 155 Screen
Material
Casing
Material
Well
Name
Slot Size
(inches)

0.020
Well
Type
Assessor’s
Parcel
Number
NOTES:
ft. btoc = feet below top of casing
PVC = polyvinyl chloride
SS = stainless steel
Well
Total Depth
(ft. btoc)
Casing
Diameter
(Inches)
2 TABLE 2

UNUSED MONITORING WELLS PROPOSED FOR DECOMMISSIONING
T H Agriculture and Nutrition Site
Fresno County, CA

URS
March 27,2018
URS Corporation - Fresno, California
Job No. 60549271
YEAR 2017 ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT
T H Agriculture & Nutrition Site
7183 East McKinley Avenue
Fresno County, California
URS
March 27, 2018
Re:

Dear Ms. Barker:

Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

A /odup / /-a
No. C 60945
r
Enclosure
KN\Projccts\THAN Site- 187 152567.0 Deliverables\2017\Rpt\Rpt 03-27-18.doc Year 2017 Annual Monitoring Report
T H Agriculture & Nutrition Site
7183 East McKinley Avenue
Fresno County, California
(URS Job No. 60549271)
Richard Hixon, PG
Senior Program Manager
URS Corporation (URS) prepared the enclosed monitoring report for the above-referenced site for Philips Electronics North America Corporation (Client).

As you authorized, the report is also being submitted to the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC).

URS Corporation
1360 E. Spruce Ave., Suite 101
Fresno, CA 93720
Tel: 559-448-8222
Fax: 559-448-8233
Ms. Shau-Luen Barker, Project Manager
Environmental Affairs Department
Philips Electronics North America Corporation
15313 West 95th Street
Lenexa, Kansas 66219
Sincerely,
URS Corporation
96ak A. CL
Stuart St. Clair, PE
Project Civil Engineer
Distribution list:

Shau-Luen Barker, Philips Electronics North America Corporation, Lenexa, KS (1 hardcopy, I CD) Danny Domingo, DTSC, Clovis, CA (2 hardcopies, I CD)
URS Fresno File (PDF only)
oeerss"ow.
%%2, m
&[6
.. — 00945 1 =o * Enp. 12/5078 /
.0or cAuOS

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
TABLE OF CONTENTS i

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1

2.0 MONITORING RESULTS3.0

3.3 QA/QC RESULTS

4.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 9

5.0 SCHEDULED ACTIVITES FOR YEAR 2018 10

6.0 LIMITATIONS 11

7.0 REFERENCES 12
i
K:\Projccu\W.\NSiie-187l5256\7.0Ddiverables\2017\Rpl\Rpi03-27-l8.doL- URS

SITE INSPECTIONS
GROUNDWATER...
3 3
3 3.1

3.2 6
6 6
7 OM&M ACTIVITIES...........................................

2.1 SITE INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE

2.2 GROUNDWATER MONITORING...............

TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)
TABLES

FIGURES

APPENDICES
ii
K:Projccs\TIIAN Si-1871525617.0 Deliverables\2017VRpiRpt 03-27-18 doc URS A
B
C
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
1 2
3 4
5 6
Onsite and Nearsite Well Location Map
Offsite Well Location Map
B-Zone Potentiometric Surface
C-Zone Potentiometric Surface
D-Zone Potentiometric Surface
Non-Regional COC Concentrations Detected in Groundwater Monitoring Wells Monitoring Well Construction Summary
Monitored Hydrogeologic Zones and Wells
Groundwater Elevation Data
Analytical Protocol for Monitoring Wells
Analytical Protocol for Domestic Wells
Analytical Results Summary for Monitoring Wells
Analytical Results Summary for Domestic Wells
Field Replicate Precision Quality Control Assessment
Site Inspection Forms
Groundwater Monitoring Field Forms
Laboratory Reports & Table of Historical Chemical Detections in Ground water Samples (on CD)

1.0 INTRODUCTION
Chloroform 80
1,2-DCA 0.5
Carbon Tetrachloride 0.5
1,2,3-TCP NN

DBCP NN
1 KVProjCcI\THAN Siie-1871525617.0 Dclivcrables\2017RpiRpt 03-27-18.doc URS As described in the Final Remedial Action Plan (RAP) [K/J, 1999], the Final Remedy includes a soil component, a groundwater component, and further engineering/administrative/institutional controls.

The soil component includes: (a) a containment cover consisting of a bentonite clay liner, a rodentcontrol barrier, clean fill soil, and a vegetative top layer; (b) an infiltration trench adjacent to the southern and western sides of the containment cover to collect surface stormwater runoff; and (c) perimeter fencing and signage. Construction of the soil component was completed in 2003.

The groundwater component of the Final Remedy includes monitored natural attenuation of chemicals of concern (COCs) and contingency plans if COC concentrations exceed Final Remediation Goals (FRGs), which are listed below:
ug/L = micrograms per liter
1,2-DCA = 1,2-dichloroethane
1,2,3-TCP = 1,2,3-trichloropropane
DBCP = 1,2-di bro mo-3-chloropropane
NN = non-numeric FRG for two regional COCs not strictly associated with the Site This report summarizes the year 2017 operation, maintenance, and monitoring (OM&M) methods and results for the soil and groundwater components of the Final Remedy for the 5-acre T H Agriculture & Nutrition, L.L.C. (THAN) Site, which is located at 7183 East McKinley Avenue, Fresno County, California (Figure 1). This report is submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Operation, Maintenance and Monitoring Plan [K/J, 2005]. Regulatory oversight of the Site is provided by the California Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). The Site was deleted from the National Priorities List (NPL) by the U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in 2006 [EPA, 2006].

Chemical of Concern
Dieldrin
YEAR 2017 ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT
T H Agriculture & Nutrition Site
7183 East McKinley Avenue
Fresno County, California
Final Remediation Goal
(ug/L)

0.3 2
K:\Projects\THAN Sic-1871525517.0 Dcliverables\2017\Rpl\Rpl 03-27-18. URS On February 18,2011, an Evaluation ofDBCP and TCP in Underlying Groundwater was submitted for DTSC’s review [K/J, 2011]. The report provided several converging lines of evidence to support the conclusion that DBCP and 1,2,3-TCP are regional groundwater contaminants, and that detections of these chemicals in groundwater samples collected near the Site are most likely primarily attributable to past non-point source applications on agricultural cropland in the region, and not to releases at the Site.

The further engineering/administrative/institutional controls of the Final Remedy includes providing alternate water supplies to affected parties, providing financial assurances to ensure long-term maintenance and operation of the Final Remedy, and conducting reviews every five years to assess whether the Final Remedy remains effective in protecting human health and the environment. The first 5-year review (FYR) was initiated in 2007, and the first FYR report was finalized in 2008 [K/J, 2008]. DTSC and EPA determined that the Final Remedy had continued to be protective of human health and the environment and that chemical specific FRGs had been attained in groundwater. EPA recommended that an evaluation of the regional contaminants DBCP and 1,2,3-TCP be performed as described in the Final RAP.

The second FYR was initiated in 2013, and the second FYR report was finalized in 2015 [URS, 2015]. The report concluded that the Final Remedy for the Site continues to function as intended and remains protective of human health and the environment. The report also provided recommendations for addressing relatively minor maintenance and administrative issues, and also for optimizing and streamlining the ongoing ground water monitoring program (GMP). A letter from DTSC dated June 11, 2015 stated that DTSC concurred with the findings of the report and determined that the remedy remains effective. A separate letter from DTSC dated October 30,2015 approved the revised GMP proposed in the second FYR report, provided that three additional monitoring wells, which had been proposed for removal from the sampling program, be retained for sampling.

The 2017 groundwater monitoring was performed in accordance with the GMP approved by DTSC in its letter dated October 30,2015, except that domestic well 3029 was not sampled because the property owner declined to grant permission. No “unusual or inconsistent” groundwater monitoring analytical results, as defined in the OM&M Plan, were obtained, and therefore it was not necessary to provide earlier reporting to DTSC than this annual report.

The work plan for the third FYR was submitted to DTSC in January 2018 [URS, 2018], and was approved by DTSC in a letter dated January 25,2018. The third FYR is scheduled for completion in 2018.

2.0 OM&M ACTIVITIES

2.1 SITE INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE
The following general maintenance activities were performed in calendar year 2017:
• Trash was removed from onsite and nearsite on a periodic basis.

Corrective-action maintenance activities, if any, are described in Section 3.1.

GROUNDWATER MONITORING2.2
3 K:Projects\TI 1 AN Site-1871 5256\7.0 Deliverables\201 TRpiRpt 03-27-1 8.doc URS The GMP approved by DTSC in its letter dated October 30, 2015 includes 12 onsite, nearsite, and offsite groundwater monitoring wells and 6 offsite domestic wells that are sampled annually. Two of • The vegetation on the top and edges of the containment cover typically grows during the wet season and dries out during the summer. Trimming and removal of vegetation is necessary during and/or after the wet season. The vegetative layer on top of the containment cover was mowed in Spring 2017 to reduce fire danger as required by the local fire protection agency.

Site inspections required by the OM&M Plan to assess the integrity, permanence, and effectiveness of the Final Remedy were conducted in June and December 2017. In accordance with DTSC’s letter dated November 17,2006, the frequency of required Site inspections has been reduced from a quarterly to a semi-annual basis. Each inspection consisted of a Site visit to observe the condition of the containment cover, vegetation, fences, infiltration trench, groundwater monitoring wells, and general Site condition. The inspector noted areas of erosion, ponding, burrowing, or other physical threats to the cover. Perimeter fencing and signage were inspected and repaired as needed. The infiltration trench was cleared of any significant accumulated debris. The physical condition and security of monitoring wells were inspected and repaired as warranted.

OM&M activities included Site inspections/maintenance and groundwater monitoring, as discussed in the subsections below. Monitoring results are presented in Section 3.0. • Three groundwater monitoring wells were destroyed in accordance with the workplan dated October 4,2017, which was approved by DTSC in a letter dated October 23,2017. These three monitoring wells (154-Al, 154-B1, and 154-C1) were located on a parcel located northeast of the Site, and the parcel owner requested that the monitoring wells be destroyed. The wells were destroyed by grouting with neat cement pumped through tremie pipe, cutting off the top of the casings down to approximately 5 feet below ground surface, pouring concrete to create mushroom-shaped caps over the grouted casings, and backfilling the voids with native soil to grade [URS, 2017].
• Rodent poison was periodically placed in onsite/nearsite bait stations to control rodents that may damage the containment cover.
4 KVProjecusiT! IANSitc-1871 525617.0 Deliverables 1 TRpiRpt 03-27-1 8.doc URS Immediately after collection, the groundwater samples were labeled and placed in a chilled, insulated container for delivery under chain-of-custody protocol to APPL, Inc. in Clovis, California, a California-accredited environmental laboratory. All groundwater samples were submitted “blind” to the analytical laboratory using sample names that did not indicate from which well the sample was Groundwater samples were collected from five of the six scheduled domestic wells in October and November 2017. Domestic well 3029 was not sampled because the property owner declined to grant permission. Domestic well samples were typically collected from the faucet nearest the wellhead after allowing water to discharge from the faucet for approximately 15 minutes.

Field quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) samples collected during year 2016 sampling included six field blanks, five travel blanks, and two field replicates. The field replicates were collected from monitoring wells 29-B and 183-B1.

On October 3, 2017, an electric sounder was used to measure the depth to water from the top of the sounding port and the total depth of the well to the nearest hundredth of a foot at each of the 27 monitoring wells used for water-level monitoring. Groundwater samples were collected from the 10 scheduled monitoring wells in October 2017. All samples were collected with dedicated pumps using low-flow purging/sampling techniques. Groundwater was not present in A-zone monitoring wells on October 3,2017, with the exception of a few feet of water in well 155-Al, which is believed to be a localized anomaly.
the onsite/nearsite monitoring wells (151-Al and 154-Al) are “resaturation response” monitoring wells that are scheduled for sampling if the A-zone resaturates. The GMP also includes 15 additional monitoring wells that are typically only used for annually measuring groundwater levels. These 15 additional monitoring wells are available for contingency sampling if unusual analytical results are obtained for any of the wells that are routinely sampled on an annual basis. The locations of onsite/nearsite wells are shown on Figure 1. Offsite well locations are shown on Figure 2.

The offsite domestic wells that are still included in the GMP include wells 1017, 3022, 3025, 3026, 3027, and 3029. These wells are located south or southeast of the plume (i.e., cross-gradient of the plume) on parcels that are not connected to the City of Fresno (City) water system. The second FYR report recommended that these wells remain in the GMP because they lacked at least four groundwater samples during the previous 15-year period, which precluded a statistically significant trend analysis on the results [URS, 2015].

Construction data for existing monitoring wells are presented in Table 1. Monitored hydrogeologic zones and associated wells are listed in Table 2. Shallow A water-bearing zone (A-zone) monitoring wells range in total depth from approximately 39 to 52 feet below ground surface (bgs). Intermediate depth B water-bearing zone (B-zone) monitoring wells range in total depth from approximately 83 to 122 feet bgs. Deep C water-bearing zone (C-zone) wells range in total depth from 152 to 170 feet bgs.

Deep D water-bearing zone (D-zone) wells range in total depth from 201 to 207 feet bgs. The term “water-bearing zone” used herein refers to a distinct layer or grouping of relatively permeable deposits, vertically separated from other water-bearing zones by a distinct, relatively impermeable layer or by multiple relatively impermeable layers. The A-zone has generally been dry since 1987. 5 K:Projccis\I! IAN Sitc-187 1 52567.0 Deliverables\2017VRprRpt 03-27-1 8.oc URS The laboratory may filter samples prior to EPA Method 8081A analysis. When needed, field personnel identify turbid samples on chain-of-custody forms, and the laboratory decides whether to filter the sample once sediments have settled. Year 2017 samples were not laboratory filtered. collected. Tables 4 and 5 list the analytical methods used for monitoring well and domestic well samples, respectively. Analyses included DBCP/EDB/1,2,3-TCP (EPA Method 504.1), purgeable halocarbons/aromatics (EPA Method 8260B), and organochlorine pesticides (EPA Method 8081A).

Analyses were performed in accordance with the Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) [K/J, 1988].

3.0 MONITORING RESULTS
Site inspection and groundwater monitoring results are presented in the two subsections below

3.1 SITE INSPECTIONS

3.2 GROUNDWATER
6 K:\Projects\THAN Sitc-1871 525617.0 Deliverables 2017VRpi\Rpl 03-27-1 8.doc URS Monitoring well analytical results for 2017 were similar to those from recent years. The only monitoring wells containing detectable COCs other than the regional contaminants DBCP and 1,2,3- TCP were wells 183-B1,184-C1, and 184-D1 with concentrations of chloroform or dieldrin less than the respective FRGs (Table 6, Figure 6). 1,2-DCA and carbon tetrachloride were not detected in any monitoring wells. The maximum DBCP and 1,2,3-TCP concentrations of 0.16 and 0.18 ug/L, The condition listed above was not detrimental to implementation of the soil or groundwater components of the Final Remedy. The minor repairs required have already been performed.

Groundwater sample analytical results were evaluated for exceedances of FRGs or first-time COC detections. None of the year 2017 monitoring well samples had COC concentrations that exceeded FRGs or had first-time COC detections. Historical chemical detections for groundwater samples, including year 2017 results, are presented in Appendix C.

Analytical results for chemicals detected in year 2017 monitoring well and domestic well samples are presented in Tables 6 and 7, respectively. Field data collected during groundwater monitoring are provided in Appendix B. Complete analytical results for year 2017 ground water monitoring are provided in Appendix C.

Soil and groundwater components of the Final Remedy were inspected in June and December 2017.

Inspection record forms are provided in Appendix A. Based on observations made during the semiannual Site inspections, the groundwater and soil components of the Final Remedy appear to be intact and effective for protecting human health and the environment. There were no signs of trespassing or disturbance to the Final Remedy. The following repair item was identified during the inspections:

1. An approximately 150-foot long section of the chain-link fence on the east side of the containment cover was found to be damaged in June 2017. The fence was repaired by a fencing contractor in July 2017.

Monitoring well depth-to-water data and calculated ground water elevations are presented on Table 3.

Ground water elevations for October 2017 were generally one to three feet higher than those for August 2016. Interpreted potentiometric-surface contour maps for the B-, C-, and D-zones on October 3,2017, are presented as Figures 3, 4, and 5, respectively. Similar to previous monitoring events, the groundwater flow direction in all three zones appears to be toward the southwest at a hydraulic gradient of approximately 0.0051 foot/foot (27 feet per mile).

3.3 QA/QC RESULTS
7 K:\PrGjects\THAN Suc-1871525617.0 Deliverables\2017\Rpi\Rpt03-27-18.oc URS Domestic well analytical results for 2017 were similar to those from recent years. None of the domestic wells contained detectable COCs other than the regional contaminants DBCP and 1,2,3-TCP (Table 7).

Chloroform, dieldrin, 1,2-DCA, and carbon tetrachloride were not detected in any domestic wells. The maximum DBCP concentration of 0.094 ug/L was detected in the sample from domestic well 3025, and the maximum 1,2,3-TCP concentration of 0.25 ug/L was detected in the sample from domestic well 3027. A trace concentration of 0.0080 ug/L of 4,4’-DDE was detected in the sample from domestic well 3026. 4,4’-DDE is not considered a primary COC for the site and has not been previously detected in groundwater samples collected from domestic well 3026. Future analytical results for this well will be monitored closely to see whether 4,4’-DDE is detected again. respectively, were detected in the sample from monitoring well 184-C1. A trace concentration of 1.7 ug/L of acetone was detected in the sample from monitoring well 184-Dl. However, this detection is considered suspect because acetone was detected at a similar concentration in a travel blank sample collected the same day. Acetone has not been previously detected in groundwater samples collected from this well.
• A travel blank collected on October 4, 2017, contained trace concentrations of acetone and bromomethane (Table 6). Acetone was detected at a similar concentration in the groundwater sample collected from monitoring well 184-D1 the same day, but this detection is considered suspect due to the presence of acetone in the travel blank. Bromomethane was not detected in any of the groundwater samples collected that day. • Travel blanks collected on October 30 and November 18, 2017, contained trace concentrations of acetone (Table 7). However, acetone was not detected in any of the groundwater samples collected on those days.
• A field blank collected on October 30,2017, contained trace concentrations of m,p-xylenes and o-xylene (Table 7). However, these analytes were not detected in any of the groundwater samples collected that day.
• The relative percent differences for primary and replicate results were no greater than the maximum acceptable precision limit, indicating no issues with analytical precision (Table 8). • None of the laboratory method blank samples contained detectable analytes. • Laboratory surrogate and spike percent recoveries were generally within the acceptable limits established under the laboratory’s QC program. A few spike percent recoveries were outside the laboratory control limits.
• COC reporting limits were less than the FRGs.

Results of the laboratory QC evaluation indicate that:
• All sample preparations and analyses were performed within the method-specific holding times.
8 K:\ProjcctTIAN Sitc-1871525617.0 Deliverables\2C17\Rpr\Rpt 03-27-18.doc URS Based on the evaluation summarized above, the data collected appear useable for decision-making purposes.

4.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
9 K:\Projects\TILAN Sue-] 871 52567.0 Deliverables\2017VRpiRpt 03-27-18.doc URS Semi-annual inspections of the Site in calendar year 2017 confirmed the integrity of the containment cover, fencing, and infiltration trench. No repairs were necessary to the containment cover. Monitoring wells were found to be in generally good condition.

All year 2017 requirements of the OM&M Plan have been completed. Based on the data collected during 2017, the groundwater and soil components of the Final Remedy as implemented remain effective at achieving the FRGs.

Groundwater analytical results for 2017 were similar to those from recent years. None of the year 2017 groundwater samples had COC concentrations that exceeded FRGs. 1,2-DCA and carbon tetrachloride were not detected in any wells. Chloroform was detected in only two monitoring wells (184-C1 and 184-D1) at concentrations substantially below the FRG, and was not detected in any domestic wells.

Dieldrin was detected in only one monitoring well (183-B1) at a concentration substantially below the FRG, and was not detected in any domestic wells. The regional contaminants DBCP and 1,2,3-TCP continued to be detected in many wells, and detected concentrations were similar to recent previous years. The available data indicate that DBCP and 1,2,3-TCP are regional groundwater contaminants, and that detections of these chemicals in groundwater samples collected near the Site are most likely primarily attributable to past non-point source applications on agricultural cropland in the region, and not to releases at the Site [K/J, 201 If
Ten groundwater monitoring wells and five domestic wells were sampled in 2017. The groundwater flow direction continued to be toward the southwest at a hydraulic gradient of approximately 0.0051 foot/foot (27 feet per mile).

5.0 SCHEDULED ACTIVITIES FOR YEAR 2018
The following activities are scheduled to be performed in calendar year 2018:

1. Inspections of the Site will continue on a semi-annual basis. 10 K:\Projects\TT IAN Sitc-18715256\7.0 DdiraoblesttCI7\Rpi\RpiO3-27-l8.doc URS

4. The third FYR will be completed in accordance with the work plan submitted to DTSC in January 2018 [URS, 2018], which was approved by DTSC in a letter dated January 25,2018.

3. Groundwater monitoring activities will continue to be performed on an annual basis in accordance with the GMP approved by DTSC in its letter dated October 30, 2015. Required communication of scheduled monitoring events and analytical results will be provided to DTSC and well owners pursuant to requirements of the OM&M Plan.

2. Maintenance of the soil and groundwater components of the Final Remedy will continue as needed. DTSC will be provided with sixty calendar days advance written notice prior to conducting significant repairs or modifications, if necessary.

6.0 LIMITATIONS
11 K:\ProjectsTHAN Site-187152567.0 Deliverables\2017VRpt\Rpt 03-27-18.doc URS This document was prepared by URS for Client in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by professional engineers, geologists, and environmental scientists in the geographic area of the above-referenced site. URS provides no other warranties, either express or implied, concerning the contents of the document, which was prepared under the technical direction of the professionals who signed the associated cover letter. The document is solely for the use and information of Client. Any reliance on the document by any other party is at such party’s own risk.

7.0 REFERENCES
12 K:VProjects\THANL Sitc-18715256\7.0 Deliverables\2017\Rpr\Rpt 03-27-18.doc URS Kennedy/Jenks Consultants [K/J, 2007]. Evaluation of Site Compliance Status and Proposed Modifications in Groundwater Monitoring, TH Agriculture & Nutrition Site, Eastern Fresno County, California, September 14, 2007.

URS Corporation [URS, 2017]. Report of Destruction of Three Monitoring Wells, T H Agriculture & Nutrition Site, 7183 East McKinley Avenue, Fresno County, California, November 15, 2017.

Kennedy/Jenks Consultants [K/J, 2011]. Evaluation of DBCP and TCP in Underlying Groundwater, T H Agriculture & Nutrition Site, Eastern Fresno County, California, February 18, 2011.

Kennedy/Jenks Consultants [K/J, 2005], Operation, Maintenance, and Monitoring Plan for the T H Agriculture & Nutrition Site, Eastern Fresno County, California, September 21,2005.

United States Environmental Protection Agency [EPA, 2006]. Notice of Deletion of the T H Agriculture & Nutrition Site from the National Priorities List, Federal Register,! 1 Fed. Reg 48,479, August 21, 2007.

URS Corporation [URS, 2018]. Third Five-Year Review Work Plan, TH Agriculture &Nutrition Site, 7183 East McKinley Avenue, Fresno County, California, January 12, 2018.

URS Corporation [URS, 2015]. Second Five-Year Review Report, T H Agriculture & Nutrition Site, 7183 East McKinley Avenue, Fresno County, California, June 29, 2015.

Kennedy/Jenks Consultants [K/J, 1988]. Quality Assurance Project Plan, THAN, Fresno County, California, April 13, 1988, amended August 3, 1988.

Kennedy/Jenks Consultants [K/J, 2008]. Five-Year Review Report for T H Agriculture & Nutrition Site, Fresno County, California, October 3, 2008.

Kennedy/Jenks Consultants [K/J, 1999]. Final Remedial Action Plan, TH Agriculture &Nutrition, L.L.C., Eastern Fresno County, California, June 1999.

Reference Points(c)
Top of Ground
Sounding Surface
Port Elevation
199.5-215 193.5-199.5
Notes:

Grout
Seal
Weil
Name
343.57
341.98
346.68
346.06
345.92
345.45
345.25
345.05
346.26
346.09
346.29
347.58
155-BO
155-C1
181-B1
181-CO
181-D1
182-B1
182-C1
182-D1
183-B1
183-B2
183-C1
183-D1
184-B1
184-C1
184-D1
347.68
346.38
342.88
343.08
343.18
339.38
339.38
339.48
338.58
338.58
338.58
338.48
332.68
332.68
332.68
72-76
91-95
159-163
177-181
79-83
134-139
177-183
350.76
345.73
341.90
341.99
342.29
340.57
340.57
340.53
340.29
339.69
340.11
339.05
331.79
331.95
331.91
345.49
348.11
348.50
347.78
348.20
348.18
348.79
346.69
347.69
348.07
349.06
348.74

82.5 158
93 160
213.5
90 170
217
92 113
170
201
100
160
203
57-77
144-154
81-91
135-145
201-211
76-86
153-163
203-213
80-90
99-109
157-167
185-195
87-97
147-157
187-197
76-92
95-111
163-170
181-201
83-100
139-160
183-203
29-B
77-A
77-B1
150-B1
150-C1
151-A1
151-B1
151-C1
154-A1
154-B1
154-C1
155-A1
54-82.5
141-157.5
79-93
129-148
196-213.5
73-90
149-165
Sand
Pack)
Bentonite
Seal
0-51.5
0-137
0-74
0-124
0-192
0-70
0-145
0-193.5
0-72
0-91
0-159
0-177
0-79
0-134
0-189
47-51
17-21

77.5-81.5
76-79
141-144
16-19
74-77
125-131
17-20
76-79
137-140
12-13.5;

26.5-28;
41-45

51.5-54
137-141
74-79
124-129
192-196
70-73
145-149
Total
Depth)
121
48 97
92 157

39.5 90
153
39 92
152
45 0-47
0-17
0-77.5
0-76
0-141
0-16
0-74
0-125
0-17
0-76
0-137
0-12
51-120
21-48

81.5-97
79-92
144-157

19.5-38
77-90
131-148
20-39
79-92
140-153

13.5-26.5;
28-41
(a) Well construction information for wells 29-B and 150-B1 through 154-C1 was taken from Ground Water Analyses January 1988 Onsite Monitoring Well Sampling, THAN Site, Eastern Fresno County, California, J. H. Kleinfelder, June 29,1988. Not all wells are sampled each year. (b) Values describe construction of the well in feet below ground surface. (c) Reference points are measured with respect to the 1929 North American Vertical Datum (feet above mean sea level). Phase I well elevation measurements have been adjusted to this datum. Well 29-B top-of-casing elevation re-surveyed August 2012 after wellhead repairs. (d) Depth of original boring in feet below ground surface. Well casing may be slightly shorter (up to several feet, in some instances) due to hole closure or sidewall sloughing during completion. Differences of one to two feet may Screen
Casing"
90-120
25-45

84.5-94.5
82-92
147-157

22.5-37.5
80-90
137-147
23-39
82-92
143-153
15-25;
30-40
Construction Interval by Depth (ft))
Solid
Casing®)
0-90
0-25
0-84.5
0-82
0-147
0-22.5
0-80
0-137
0-23
0-82
0-143
0-15;
25-30;
40-45
0-57
0-144
0-81
0-135
0-201
0-76
0-153
0-203
0-80
0-99
0-157
0-185
0-87
0-147
0-187
TABLE 1

MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY)
T H Agriculture and Nutrition Site
Fresno County, CA

(e)
(f)
(g)
be found between these data and incidental references in other reports. Such differences are common, reflecting disparities between observers or between design and as-built measurements.

Well 29-B is constructed of 2-inch ID Schedule 40 PVC. Wells 77-A through 77-B1 and 155-C1 through 184-D1 are constructed of 4-inch ID Schedule 40 PVC. Wells 150-B1 through 154-C1 are constructed of 4-inch ID stainless steel. Wells 155-A1 and 155-BO are constructed of 5-inch ID stainless steel.

Screen for well 29-B is constructed of 2-inch ID Schedule 40 PVC with 0.020-inch slots. Screens for wells 77-A, 77-B1, 150-B1,151-B1, 154-A1, 154-B1, and 155-C1 through 184-D1 are constructed of 4-inch ID stainless steel with 0.010-inch slots. Screens for wells 150-C1 and 154-C1 are constructed of 4-inch ID stainless steel with 0.020-inch slots. The screen for well 151-C1 is constructed of 4-inch ID stainless steel with 0.015-inch slots.

Screens for wells 155-A1 and 155-BO are constructed of 5-inch ID stainless steel with 0.008-inch slots.

The sand packs for wells 29-B and 150-B1 through 154-C1 consist of No. 3 Monterey sand (No. 3 refers to grading size). The sand packs for wells 77-A, 155-C1, 181-CO, 184-C1, and 184-D1 consist of No. 0/30 Lonestar Lapis Lustre sand. The sand packs for wells 77-B1 and 183-C1 consist of No. 2/12 Lonestar Lapis Lustre sand.

The sand packs for wells 155-A1 and 155-BO consist of Lonestar Lapis Lustre Pipe 30 sand. The sand packs for wells 181-B1, 181-D1 through 183-B2, 183-D1, and 184-B1 consist of No. 1/20 Lonestar Lapis Lustre sand.

TABLE 1

MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION SUMMARY
T H Agriculture and Nutrition Site
Fresno County, CA

2 Active:

Contingency: 77-A and 155-A1
B (intermediate) 5 Active:

C (deep) 4 Active:

D (deep) 1 Active: 184-D1
Total Number of
Monitoring Wells
29-B, 150-B1, 151-B1,
154-B1, and 183-B1
150-C1, 151-C1,154-C1,
and 184-C1
Monitoring Wells
151-A1 and 154-A1
Water-Bearing Zone
A (shallow)
Contingency: 77-B1,155-BO, 181-B1.
182-B1, 183-B2, and
184-B1
Contingency: 155-C1, 181-CO, 182-C1,
and 183-C1
Contingency: 181-D1, 182-D1, and
183-D1
TABLE 2

MONITORED HYDROGEOLOGIC ZONES AND WELLS
T H Agriculture and Nutrition Site
Fresno County, CA

Date
29-B 345.492 121 21-Jun-10 n/m n/m
18-Jul-11 54.05 290.90
14-May-12 55.80 289.15
15-Jul-13 n/m n/m
1-Jul-14 n/m n/m
11-Nov-15 n/m n/m
23-Aug-16 n/m n/m
3-Oct-17 n/m n/m
348.1177-A 4 48 23-Aug-16 Dry Dry
3-Oct-17 Dry Dry
77-B1 4 348.50 97 23-Aug-16 71.20 277.30

70.43 278.07
150-B1 347.78 4 92 21-Jun-10 63.10 284.68
18-Jul-11 61.92 285.86
14-May-12 63.22 284.56
15-Jul-13 64.90 282.88
1-Jul-14 69.12 278.66
11-Nov-15 73.81 273.97
23-Aug-16 72.05 275.73
3-Oct-17 69.61 278.17
150-C1 4 348.20 157 21-Jun-10 64.28 283.92
18-Jul-11 63.08 285.12
14-May-12 64.54 283.66
15-Jul-13 66.15 282.05
1-Jul-14 70.73 277.47
11-Nov-15 74.98 273.22
23-Aug-16 73.12 275.08
3-Oct-17 70.62 277.58
Casing
Diameter
(inches)
Calculated
Groundwater
Elevation
(ft. amsl)
Well
Name
Top of Casing
Elevation
(ft. amsl)
Measured
Depth to Water
(ft. bloc)
Well
Total Depth
(ft. btoc)
TABLE 3

GROUNDWATER ELEVATION DATA
T H Agriculture and Nutrition Site
Fresno County, CA

Date
151-A1 4 347.18 21-Jun-1039.5 Dry Dry
18-Jul-11 Dry Dry
14-May-12 40.60 306.58
15-Jul-13 Dry Dry
1-Jul-14 Dry Dry
11-Nov-15 Dry Dry
23-Aug-16 Dry Dry
3-Oct-17 Dry Dry
151-B1 4 348.79 90 21-Jun-10 66.04 282.75
18-Jul-11 64.95 283.84
14-May-12 66.46 282.33
15-Jul-13 67.74 281.05
1-Jul-14 72.00 276.79
11-Nov-15 76.71 272.08
23-Aug-16 74.48 274.31
3-Oct-17 72.10 276.69
151-C1 4 346.69 153 21-Jun-10 64.00 282.69
18-Jul-11 63.05 283.64
14-May-12 64.50 282.19
15-Jul-13 65.85 280.84
1-Jul-14 70.30 276.39
11-Nov-15 74.81 271.88
23-Aug-16 72.51 274.18
3-Oct-17 70.13 276.56
Casing
Diameter
(inches)
Calculated
Groundwater
Elevation
(ft. amsl)
Well
Name
Top of Casing
Elevation
(ft. amsl)
Measured
Depth to Water
(ft. btoc)
Well
Total Depth
(ft. btoc)
TABLE 3

GROUNDWATER ELEVATION DATA
T H Agriculture and Nutrition Site
Fresno County, CA

Date
154-A1 4 347.69 39 21-Jun-10 Dry Dry
18-Jul-11 Dry Dry
14-May-12 Dry Dry
15-Jul-13 Dry Dry
1-Jul-14 Dry Dry
11-Nov-15 Dry Dry
23-Aug-16 Dry Dry
3-Oct-17 Dry Dry
154-B1 4 348.07 92 21-Jun-10 60.31 287.76
18-JUI-11 59.00 289.07
14-May-12 60.80 287.27
15-Jul-13 61.74 286.33
1-Jul-14 66.82 281.25
11-Nov-15 71.86 276.21
23-Aug-16 69.19 278.88
3-Oct-17 66.66 281.41
154-C1 4 349.06 152 21-Jun-10 62.03 287.03
18-Jul-11 60.65 288.41
14-May-12 62.20 286.86
15-Jul-13 63.64 285.42
1-Jul-14 68.40 280.66
11-Nov-15 73.41 275.65
23-Aug-16 70.92 278.14
3-Oct-17 68.48 280.58
Casing
Diameter
(inches)
Calculated
Groundwater
Elevation
(ft. amsl)
Well
Name
Top of Casing
Elevation
(ft. amsl)
Measured
Depth to Water
(ft. btoc)
Well
Total Depth
(ft. btoc)
TABLE 3

GROUNDWATER ELEVATION DATA
T H Agriculture and Nutrition Site
Fresno County, CA

Date
155-Al 5 348.74 21-Jun-1045 42.08 306.66
18-Jul-11 42.14 306.60
14-May-12 42.16 306.58
15-Jul-13 42.13 306.61
1-Jul-14 42.21 306.53
11-Nov-15 42.29 306.45
23-Aug-16 42.21 306.53
3-Oct-17 306.5942.15
155-BO 350.76 5 82.5 21-Jun-10 n/m n/m
18-Jul-11 65.12 285.64
14-May-12 66.74 284.02
15-Jul-13 67.95 282.81
1-Jul-14 72.78 277.98
11-Nov-15 77.48 273.28
23-Aug-16 75.00 275.76
3-Oct-17 72.15 278.61
155-C1 345.734 158 21-Jun-10 n/m n/m
18-Jul-11 61.11 284.62
14-May-12 62.72 283.01
15-Jul-13 63.93 281.80
1-Jul-14 69.43 276.30
11-Nov-15 73.13 272.60
23-Aug-16 70.71 275.02
3-Oct-17 68.30 277.43
Casing
Diameter
(inches)
Calculated
Groundwater
Elevation
(ft. amsl)
Well
Name
Top of Casing
Elevation
(ft. amsl)
Measured
Depth to Water
(ft. btoc)
Well
Total Depth
(ft. btoc)
TABLE 3

GROUNDWATER ELEVATION DATA
T H Agriculture and Nutrition Site
Fresno County, CA

Date
181-B1 4 341.90 93 21-Jun-10 65.04 276.86
18-JUI-11 64.15 277.75
14-May-12 65.80 276.10
15-Jul-13 66.75 275.15
1-Jul-14 70.58 271.32
11-Nov-15 75.31 266.59
23-Aug-16 68.31 273.59
3-Oct-17 68.81 273.09
181-CO 341.99 4 160 21-Jun-10 65.40 276.59
18-JuM 1 64.62 277.37
14-May-12 66.16 275.83
15-Jul-13 67.20 274.79
1-Jul-14 70.70 271.29
11-Nov-15 75.71 266.28
23-Aug-16 68.82 273.17
3-Oct-17 69.32 272.67
181-D1 4 342.29 213.5 21-Jun-10 66.77 275.52
18-JuM 1 66.30 275.99
14-May-12 67.36 274.93
15-Jul-13 68.90 273.39
1-Jul-14 72.31 269.98
11-Nov-15 76.61 265.68
23-Aug-16 73.04 269.25
3-Oct-17 71.65 270.64
182-B1 4 340.57 90 23-Aug-16 71.24 269.33
3-Oct-17 69.74 270.83
182-C1 4 340.57 170 23-Aug-16 71.48 269.09
3-Oct-17 69.72 270.85
Casing
Diameter
(inches)
Calculated
Groundwater
Elevation
(ft amsl)
Well
Name
Top of Casing
Elevation
(ft. amsl)
Measured
Depth to Water
(ft. btoc)
Well
Total Depth
(ft. btoc)
TABLE 3

GROUNDWATER ELEVATION DATA
T H Agriculture and Nutrition Site
Fresno County, CA

Date
182-D1 4 340.53 217 23-Aug-16 71.46 269.07
3-Oct-17 69.74 270.79
183-B1 340.294 92 21-Jun-10 64.32 275.97
18-JUI-11 63.40 276.89
14-May-12 64.13 276.16
15-JUI-13 66.28 274.01
1-Jul-14 69.32 270.97
11-Nov-15 74.71 265.58
23-Aug-16 72.23 268.06
3-Oct-17 69.27 271.02
183-B2 4 339.69 113 21-Jun-10 63.48 276.21
18-Jul-11 62.80 276.89
14-May-12 63.59 276.10
15-Jul-13 65.47 274.22
1-Jul-14 68.53 271.16
11-Nov-15 73.03 266.66
23-Aug-16 71.35 268.34
3-Oct-17 69.40 270.29
183-C1 4 340.11 170 21-Jun-10 63.31 276.80
18-Jul-11 62.56 277.55
14-May-12 63.41 276.70
15-Jul-13 65.25 274.86
1-Jul-14 68.71 271.40
11-Nov-15 73.12 266.99
23-Aug-16 71.45 268.66
3-Oct-17 70.13 269.98
Casing
Diameter
(inches)
Calculated
Ground water
Elevation
(ft. amsl)
Well
Name
Top of Casing
Elevation
(ft. amsl)
Measured
Depth to Water
(ft. btoc)
Well
Total Depth
(ft. btoc)
TABLE 3

GROUNDWATER ELEVATION DATA
T H Agriculture and Nutrition Site
Fresno County, CA

Date
183-D1 4 339.05 201 21-Jun-10 62.25 276.80
18-Jul-11 61.48 277.57
14-May-12 62.31 276.74
15-Jul-13 64.22 274.83
1-Jul-14 67.57 271.48
11-Nov-15 71.98 267.07
23-Aug-16 70.40 268.65
3-Oct-17 68.21 270.84
184-B1 4 331.79 100 21-Jun-10 78.29 253.50
18-Jul-11 78.80 252.99
14-May-12 79.06 252.73
15-Jul-13 80.76 251.03
1-Jul-14 84.28 247.51
11-Nov-15 86.54 245.25
23-Aug-16 85.74 246.05
3-Oct-17 82.95 248.84
184-C1 4 331.95 160 21-Jun-10 78.55 253.40
18-Jul-H 79.30 252.65
14-May-12 79.39 252.56
15-Jul-13 81.18 250.77
1-Jul-14 84.91 247.04
11-Nov-15 86.85 245.10
23-Aug-16 86.00 245.95
3-Oct-17 83.07 248.88
Casing
Diameter
(inches)
Calculated
Groundwater
Elevation
(ft. ams!)
Well
Name
Top of Casing
Elevation
(ft. amsl)
Measured
Depth to Water
(ft. btoc)
Well
Total Depth
(ft. btoc)
TABLE 3

GROUNDWATER ELEVATION DATA
T H Agriculture and Nutrition Site
Fresno County, CA

Date
184-D1 4 331.91 203 21-Jun-10 79.06 252.85
18-Jul-11 80.52 251.39
14-May-12 79.88 252.03
15-Jul-13 81.73 250.18
1-Jul-14 85.30 246.61
11-Nov-15 87.51 244.40
23-Aug-16 85.67 246.24
3-Oct-17 83.52 248.39
Casing
Diameter
(inches)
Calculated
Groundwater
Elevation
(ft. amsl)
Well
Name
Top of Casing
Elevation
(ft. amsl)
Measured
Depth to Water
(ft. btoc)
Well
Total Depth
(ft. btoc)
NOTES:

Well 29-B top-of-casing elevation re-surveyed August 2012 after wellhead repairs. ft. amsl = feet above mean sea level
ft. btoc = feet below top of casing
n/m = not measured, because well not on sampling schedule, or due to mechanical issue TABLE 3

GROUNDWATER ELEVATION DATA
T H Agriculture and Nutrition Site
Fresno County, CA

Analyses (a)
29-B
150-B1
150-C1
151-AI
151-B1
151-C1
154-A1
154-B1
154-C1
183-B1
184-C1
184-D1
Well
Name
O = Analytical protocol
x = Analysis performed
in 2017
Notes:
(a) EPA Methods: 504.1
(b) Frequency:

DBCP/EDB/1,2,3-TCP
Purgeable Halocarbons/Aromatics
Organochlorine Pesticides
Annual
Resaturation response, sampled annually if A-zone
resaturates
8260B
8081A
A
R
TABLE 4

ANALYTICAL PROTOCOL FOR MONITORING WELLS
T H Agriculture and Nutrition Site
Fresno County, CA

000000000000
000000000000
000000000000
Frequency (b)EPA 504.1EPA 8260BEPA 8081A
Well
Name
(a)
O = Analytical protocol
x = Analysis performed
in 2017
Notes:
(a) EPA Methods: 504.1
(b) Frequency:
(c) Owner of well 3029 refused access for sampling.

DBCP/EDB/1,2,3-TCP
Purgeable Halocarbons/Aromatics
Organochlorine Pesticides
Annual
8260B
8081A
A
TABLE 5

ANALYTICAL PROTOCOL FOR DOMESTIC WELLS
T H Agriculture and Nutrition Site
Fresno County, CA

Frequency (b)EPA 504.1EPA 8260BEPA 8081A
000000000000000000
©
XCC()6)6)
OOO000
WCCCCC NOI(1O
EPA 504.1 EPA 8260B EPA 8081A
==
29-B 5-Oct-17 <0.02 0.098 < 1 <0.5 <0.05
150-B1 5-OCM7 <0.02 <0.02 < 10 < 1 <0.5 <0.05
150-B1 Rep 5-Oct-17 <0.02 <0.02 < 10 < 1 <0.5 <0.05
150-C1 5-Oct-17 <0.02 0.073 < 10 <1 <0.5 <0.05
151-B1 5-Oct-17 <0.02 <0.02 < 10 < 1 <0.5 <0.05
151-C1 5-Oct-17 <0.02 <0.02 < 10 <1 <0.5 <0.05
154-B1 4-Oct-17 <0.02 <0.02 <.10 <1 <0.5 <0.05
154-C1 4-Oct-17 <0.02 <0.02 < 10 <1 <0.5 <0.05
154-C1 Rep 4-Oct-17 <0.02 <0.02 < 10 <1 <0.5 <0.05
183-B1 5-Oct-17 0.12 0.17 < 10 <1 <0.5 0.035 J
184-C1 4-Oct-17 0.180.16 < 10 <1 1.2 <0.05
4-Oct-17184-D1 0.13 0.12 1.7 J <1 1.2 <0.05
FB 4-Oct-17 <0.02 <0.02 < 10 <1 <0.5 <0.05
FB 5-Oct-17 <0.02 <0.02 < 10 < 1 <0.5 <0.05
TB 4-Oct-17 NA NA 1.3 J 0.26 J <0.5 NA
TB 5-Oct-17 NA NA < 10 < 1 <0.5 NA
FRG NN NN NE NE 80 0.3
DBCP
(ug/L)
Dieldrin
(ug/L)
Date
Sampled
Acetone
(ug/L)
< 10
Chloroform
(ug/L)
1,2,3-TCP
(ug/L)
Well/Sample
Name
NOTES:

Only analytes detected in at least one sample are presented on this table.

See laboratory report in appendix for full list of analytes and reporting limits.

DBCP = 1,2-dlbromo-3-chloropropane
EPA = U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
FB = field blank
FRG = final remediation goal from the June 1999 Final Remedial Action Plan J = estimated value
NA = not analyzed
NE = not established
NN = non-numeric
Rep = replicate
TB = travel blank
1,2,3-TCP = 1,2,3-trichloropropane
ug/L = micrograms per liter
Bromomethane
(ug/L)
TABLE 6

ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY FOR MONITORING WELLS
T H Agriculture and Nutrition Site
Fresno County, CA

EPA 504.1 EPA 8260B EPA 8081A
1017 0.0070 J <10 <0.05
3022 30-OCM7 0.0081 J 0.053 <10 <1 <0.5 <0.05
3022 Rep 30-Oct-17 0.0073 J 0.045 <10 <1 <0.5 <0.05
3025 30-Oct-17 0.094 0.030 <10 <1 <0.5 <0.05
3026 18-NOV-17 0.011 J 0.040 <10 < 1 <0.5 0.0080 J
4-Oct-173027 0.063 0.25 <10 <1 <0.5 <0.05
30-Oct-17FB <0.02 <0.02 <10 0.48 J 0.40 J <0.05
18-NOV-17FB <0.02 <0.02 <10 <1 <0.5 <0.05
30-Oct-17TB NA NA 5.2 J < 1 <0.5 NA
TB 18-Nov-17 NA NA 6.6 J < 1 <0.5 NA

FRG NN NN NE NE NE NE
Acetone
(ug/L)
DBCP
(ug/L)
Date
Sampled
30-Oct-17
o-Xylene
<0.5
4,4'-DDE (ug/L)
1,2,3-TCP
(ug/L)
<0.02
Well/Sample
Name
m,p-Xylenes
■ W
< 1
NOTES:

Only analytes detected in at least one sample are presented on this table.

See laboratory report in appendix for full list of analytes and reporting limits.

DBCP = 1,2-dlbromo-3-chloropropane
EPA = U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
FB = field blank
FRG = final remediation goal from the June 1999 Final Remedial Action Plan J = estimated value
NA = not analyzed
NE = not established
NN = non-numeric
Rep = replicate
TB = travel blank
1,2,3-TCP = 1,2,3-trlchloropropane
ug/L = micrograms per liter
TABLE 7

ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY FOR DOMESTIC WELLS
T H Agriculture and Nutrition Site
Fresno County, CA

Well Name EPA Method RPD
3022 504.1 10.4 25 No
504.1 1,2,3-TCP 0.053 0.045 16.3 25 No
RPD Precision
Analyte Limit Exceeded?
DBCP
Date
Sampled
30-Oct-17
Primary Result
(ug/L)

0.0081
NOTES:

Only analytes detected in at least one sample are presented on this table. Results are shown without "J" or “Y" flags (see Tables 6 and 7).Field replicates were also collected at monitoring wells 150-B1 and 154-C1, but no analytes were detected in the primary or replicate samples (see Table 6).

DBCP = 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane
EPA = U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
NC = not calculated, because one result was less than the analytical reporting limit RPD = relative percent difference, calculated as the difference between the two results, divided by the average of the two results, multiplied by 100 ug/L = micrograms per liter1,2,3-TCP = 1,2,3-trichloropropane RPD Precision
Limit
Replicate Result
(ug/L)

0.0073
TABLE 8

FIELD REPLICATE PRECISION QUALITY CONTROL ASSESSMENT
T H Agriculture and Nutrition Site
Fresno County, CA

$154 1.B1.C1
[
McKinley
—1
X 29-B?
1I
*+155-A1,B0 SITE
77-A,B1
155-C1-
L_
151-A1,Blc142-
i
i
i
i
ii
II
T
I
150-B1.C1
|
!
-(N)-
I 300 FEET

APPROXMATE SCALE
•M
I
—I
I
I
Florador
LEGEND:

I
-X--------- X--------- XGroundwoter Monitoring Well
Well Sampled in 2017
Mill Ditch
THAN Property Boundory Site Boundary (Fence)
S I s
$
URS Job 60549271 SBS 03-05-2018 FIGURE 1

ONSITE AND NEARSITE WELL LOCATION MAP
T H Agriculture & Nutrition Site
Fresno County, California
I-
// ...../
/
i,
3 ... T
I
Temperance
I|
iI'
|
|
2 -
0936 :9330
934
I
0993
1 $
9400 : o 3015 —... 940-2Q..J001 ‘8 386
908 i - O %7%/ / O
3020
30210 976 i Q3018.
1 O 3023
923 ;
O i
183-B2,C1,D1
38 |..
..... Q902 922
0l29160
3030 921
o 9.
s ,38,2,93 '
JG0 : •
9580...

O i
!
sg.”8g.848
’ iiiii
QO ;
_ ___i__
3026
i : i 382)
/
B
A
V
I
10260
iL /
O
3003:
-183-Bl
0917
’ O
3015
O
983
Q -
931
O o
971
3029
O
: 0930
0937
_____
—0
03024
01017
3027
8 -
3028
I
926
:973: :—$182-31,C1,D1 :
29984 810 9, 099
•2741 $83534
.3011.

O\
181-B1.co.Dle ;
i
iii 980:9793025
993 977__ :
30736 987’86
./
63 y
20309,
939J
-i
25 384
MLz9
10110.
:1012 1
1013 ,
1f9
9?50..............
0901
i| !
|
1023o.

Q02s ; 1 1
Z
in
|—
1 /
I I
30130
| a
: C
J___i 2048__ J
970
O
Floradore
~969
XL
,85878°s
11986 0984 O " O : oos. 981-A
1 i
! i
__‘___ Belmont
(g
O
J
o
981
1 i
%ar
m40
1001O992 i 1---;
r
|! 30000._
28 10410
i ____
1040
O
’I
Olive L
I 8
|
LHarvey_ 184-C1,D1o989
184-B1
98 -987
•| .032:
0 ; 1037
Pou,
%
1032 30380
1 i

99. —
1 MiU Ditch
0938
Mill Ditch
lo.*
7 McKinley
978
3007 •
i O.

II l
I
c
LEGEND:
-X-------XO Domestic Well
Groundwater Monitoring Well
Well Sampled in 2017
NOTES:

1. See Figure 1 for wells onsite and nearsite.
0 4s0 900 FEET
THAN Property Boundary
Site Boundary (Fence)
I
r
lI
OFFSITE WELL LOCATION MAP URS Job 60549271 SBS 03-05-2018 T H Agriculture & Nutrition Site
Fresno County, California
FIGURE 2

1.. |...
f
luue. du
Oi hi
Armstrong
LEGEND: 0936
— THAN Property Boundary
!
-x------- x------- x- Site Boundary (Fence)
i
i. O Domestic Well
V
I ■
Mill Ditch.
9030 Groundwater Monitoring Well
155-B0 Mill Ditch McKinley
10410 993
O.
:
..967
0930151-B1
276.69 270
4 1 1.3000o 9400
D —94020 J01
1013 ?

2./.
,23 '
O O : JL 2
Floradora

92. 3020
3022 973
..Q;
910 .Q999 3023 On : O 974
998 O
1 8917271.02 9
■ 3030 921
o O -l C.
e 9so293 .

Ca°ii ___
9580 1925 3004 !
1 75- —V
Olive O : O
—■—|[
01017 980 9793025
I O
o a8/) - J i O969
93 8% /
1 2...3005 E
i 12 °
Horvey I C1021 1
.Q987 II
,8s
-
Po
“fe
’So 1023o.
/"
1032 I
||
|
D 900 FEET
/
1009
9025 :

I O:
‘3016
1 30130 il
URS Job 60549271 SBS 03-05-2018 FIGURE 3
184-B1
248.84
150-81
278.17
154-B1
281.41
181-B1 273.09
150-B1 O
278.17 3003
29-B
n/m
923 :

O
7 93
9180..... J
___ 092.

O3024 !
■9330
40934
998 Tr-------- ---------------
3007 >
i O.
1996
O
1040
O
1|
o
983
f O
3015
976 i
O o
971
= o
2048
1 1
970
O
Q
981
; 931
Interpreted Potentiometric Surface Elevation Contour
(Feet AMSL)
NOTES:

1. n/m = not measured

2. AMSL = Above Mean Sea Level

3. All contours are approximate.

Montoring Well Name and
Potentiometric Surface Elevation
(Feet AMSL)
Y
///
926
.... o i
.3011.
. O.

Il 2043il O
10260
Ii
<6s
3027
■8
3028
: 922
....Q..

B-ZONE POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE
OCTOBER 3, 2017
T H Agriculture & Nutrition Site
Fresno County, California
I.69950
i 0901

APPROXIMATE SCALE
ASO
?o
3021003018
%o.
[■ ll J
038
,9,8.3.82.
35s
.. i0gdo,00 91087801022 . 30 : O 994 : 1003 O —5
O i 1027 :
10420
So
278.61 \
...559
2s
1038/30380 182-B1 r270.83
: :: :980.2/1C
9560 7780 8054, 86°
::: : —UCO
°icos 1982 ....... 963_-=—
10198-
38786
Too
978o,
_ | Belmont
. O 1024
Sor,
%
iO 1
; 1037 1010
0984 O
: ; 981-A 7S
----‘
T 0936 LEGEND: .938
' O* —f
THAN Property Boundary
Site Boundary (Fence)
O Domestic Well
I Mill Ditch.

Groundwater Monitoring Well
Mill Ditch 27s
McKinley
10410 993... $
07 ’ '
978.
260
- —L i 30000 ,
o
;
o
I
10380
\ 1038 Q906
1_ Floradora 907 O 387—=
976
30210 o
26s
o
23 O J
!
f 26o. —19180. 269.98 |i... c
9580 961 S
O 925 3004 T
i Olive
9a —
I
I
il i
7 25s. 1
,005 | | O
"... /
9969
-/
i
-
Os
3So.
21822882:858
1O12a ! _ . .3005
118 ° § ?8
: O1021
\
: 11020. ■
0984 o
981- \ ,9.0787
|
V
981-A
248.88
Sor
'So •I .
1023o
_|/ : 1232 o • 1009 -■
j. a JJ Qaa5 ! i |
o 900 FEET450
Belmont
1024 O 10260 :

JL
J Ci
) / — 1
|
30130
URS Job 60549271 03-05-2018 FIGURE 4
181-C0
272.67
182-C1
270.85
150-C1
277.58
154-C1
280.58
155-C1
277.43
970
O
991
O
983
.o.
931
i
o
.924...

I i
' O
3015 154-Cl
280.58
i O
i 1037
-
O :
1010
1040
o
§
I
3026
o
o O
i 971
il
I
923
O
Monitoring Well Name and Potentiometric Surface Elevation (Feet AMSL)
Interpreted Potentiometric
Surface Elevation Contour
(Feet AMSL)
ii
!
/
d
<9330
0934_
NOTES:

1. n/m = not meosured2. AMSL = Above Mean Sea Level

3. All contours are approximate.
397 994
27s 990
0937

1..
•.....

C-ZONE POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE
OCTOBERS, 2017
T H Agriculture & Nutrition Site
Fresno County, California
. 3011’ -.

O
03 299 i
ji
3023
: O
:-------11
i 2045
O|
io i
:3016
—
i/ J
_____
0901
190 vo188., 30′8,8.
3“
3 ; 3029! Q
183-C1
'Ill
103018 o .
l OS
i 974
?8 i
Q i" 1027:
10420
20309,
o. |
11 ..Q919.....i 3028 j 925 3004 1
03024 _______ J0L2 I
Harvey
I 184-C1
i
2%—
78 r i ‘s
|
,98.8-842,1696
Q902 H
8 010 Q. . 0999
1980:9793025 01017 : %o ”8o‘8 0“o 00 ° 924 21005 782 965 - O c - A
g.
'1I
-
5T
LEGEND:
i 9330
I 934
THAN Property Boundary
Site Boundory (Fence)
O Domestic Well
Mill Ditch
9030. Groundwater Monitoring Well
30% 932
Mill Ditch
i
McKinley
10410 0993 ... '
939 Q 247 978.
[
265 !
30’8 3086 3883
1 2 991..... '
:1012
3 1
182-D1
i 270.79 908 i 4
Os 8"” 8.83
: 9731 ad
387— %2/4
23 1 9
......

Floradora
!
1 |
3022. ..O;
0999 3023
■
O 923 :
974 ! O
% 98 922
O Vil Q O
%e8"
| — , ____ c
i 3028
.1
"88"78"P
1017
O O i
-
I
1037 1010 ; 966
I
926
O i
382/ /
/ O
! 09 i
1 i
.....3005 O.
1&0
| Harvey : O1021 i O
986
..098.
- X.3011.
\ o\
*£
A‘e i % 1023o__ m APPROXIMATE SCALE
I u
1032 O 450 900 FEET
o 1009
: O i 9025i 1026° 'I
---- 1 ----- i------- r
Belmont
1024
T
||
I &II i
-—
l
Ii ! N 30130
URS Job 60549271 SBS 03-05-2018 FIGURE 5
O
3020
184-D1
248.39
181-DI
270.64
183-D1
270.84
O
981
O
983
183—D1 270.84
1040
o
1 970
O
J 87
184
1 i
i
925 3004
O ; O
Interpreted Potentiometric Surface Elevation Contour
(Feet AMSL)
. 0930
0937
[O _
971.
. 3029
1 O
Monitoring Well Name and
Potentiometric Surface Elevation
(Feet AMSL)
3027
8 3021003018/6,8,%q,,|
WW ■ (
..NOTES: .

1. n/m = not measured

2. AMSL = Above Mean Sea Level

3. All contours are approximate.
0936
O
1027
10420
958%

D-ZONE POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE
OCTOBER 3, 2017
T H Agriculture & Nutrition Site
Fresno County, California
|| Olive
II---
i
3000g •
%
*
*s.
%
*,
i 915’6'^3 —..........0n9
P0°1 i il O3024 i
0938
100
- —
IC
ioodoM oi0?8°ip22
301 9 352 i 1003° “ ‘ —
9400 i i
940=RQ.oor
an- • :
995Q
0901
0984 o
; 1 981-A
: a35 1/99
/
2____
1655/10380
: O !
IW'i
/ ( —
I
Harvey 184-C1,D!
o
1037
184-B1
,82 9987 0%4.O 981-A
e Chloroform
Pure
'So
1023o
j G02s ;
Belmont
G 94a
30130
986
O
Zone
C1
D1
1032 >
P 1009 • o1024

1.2 1.2
%27
1040 j
Sot
485
: 30210 973 %Z40 - 0 9
971: : 974 I
«is
O
!
,99.87842.
9580...... 941913
0969
..3005
o
983
I j
1001
13018/ o
‘87878%%
980: 979 3025 QO : O
82788,2,8780-8.
,83_ .:
3026
O
8"g,”89‘80"*
$84 710 Q,
0902
_ 012
9950
: o’
01 .
1 0936 LEGEND:
:9330
i _ ______
Groundwater Monitoring Well
O Domestic Well
Mill Ditch THAN Property Boundary
9030,
Site Boundary (Fence)
McKinley :

EZP
....
939
„cr® 1
924 NOTES:
.029%
3030 921 2 -
_____
P. ,.O c

4. O
Zone
81 8.......7
/
\

APPROXIMATE SCALE
0 450 900 FEET
-oz60
Dieldrin

0.035 J
3023 . o
3820
! i
! i
O
3003
926
. O
183-32,C1,D1
-183-B1.....
18717........ L
■ 382
3007 >
: O -
922
3029 .Q...

O
3027

8..
3028
3022:
.Q
923 :
. O .
047
—99. %0 wo?,8,,?0‘8388.

2..943.

1. Chemical of concern (COC) concentrations
shown are in micrograms per liter. "J" flogs
indicate estimated trace results.

2. Replicate results are not shown.

3. All COC detections in groundwater samples were
at concentrations less than the Final
Remediation Goals.
. Regional contaminants DBCP and 1,2,3-TCP
are not shown on this figure; nor are detected
chemicals that are not identified as COCs for
the site.
-------•
SITE
.3011
•: O\
9780,
-(N)-
i
925 3004
o { o
UUl IHtch
10410

1.1.3000.
1 i 10380
fl
Floradora
Olive
1040 ;
O i
URS Job 80549271 SBS 03-05-2018 FIGURE 6

NON-REGIONAL COC CONCENTRATIONS DETECTED IN GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELLS AUTUMN 2017
T H Agriculture & Nutrition Site
Fresno County, California
&°
80 m ...&
un OS
8 | $
o
\
Armstrong
8o
og.... i
& i & i
............vaz".... 2 B8g
•!............. o’
f.o
* 1...
8 %o.
i go

APPENDIX A

SITE INSPECTION FORMS
Kennedy/Jenks Consultants
Signature: Hul 4 C
Date: 06/28/2017 Page: 1 of I
Item Yes No Comments
X
X
Are the fence posts in good condition? X
Is there debris or trash onsite?
Additional observations:

VanZallm to eastern
-fence — will be Joon.

VEGETATED COVER INTEGRITY
Are there signs of erosion on the
cover?
Does the vegetation on the cover
appear stressed?
Is there ponding on the cover, or are
there indications of ponding?
Are the perimeter drainage and
infiltration trench functioning?
Are there signs of animals burrowing
in the cover?
Are the fences intact and free of holes
or tears?
Are the site perimeter signs intact and
legible?

SITE SECURITY
Are the gates shut and locked?
Are the chains and locks in good
condition?
Is there evidence of trespassing or
other misuse of the site?
OTHER
Are there indications of the presence
of chemicals (e.g., soil discoloration,
odor)?
Operation, Maintenance and Monitoring Plan for the
T H Agriculture & Nutrition Site, Eastern Fresno County, California g Er 90_13m709 r/yxytskmfnip^ltMsliMiOI doc
Table 1: Inspection Record Form for Soil Component of
Final Remedy
Inspector: S+var+ +.Clair
Kennedy/Jenks Consultants
Inspector or+ J4, Clajr- Signature: ust J, Can
Date: 06/28/2017 Page: 1 of * II
Yes No Comments
Bollards in good condition?
dunwe arondhocter
eO( , . ... monktovng event.

Additional observations:

During spring inspection:

A-zone wells sounded to
monitor for resaturation?
Casing and screen
undamaged?
Well cap and padlock present
and secure?
Protective well cover in good
condition?
Operation, Maintenance and Monitoring Plan for the
T H Agriculture & Nutrition Site, Eastern Fresno County, California Table 2: Inspection Record Form for Groundwater
Component of Final Remedy
(/I( be sounded -oon
Item
Well identification markings
intact?
Kennedy/Jenks Consultants
Inspector: Signature: Jtu.F , Cla
Date: Page: » of / 1
Item Yes No Comments
Are the fence posts in good condition?
Is there debris or trash onsite?
Additional observations:

Are the site perimeter signs intact and
legible?
Is there evidence of trespassing or
other misuse of the site?
Is there ponding on the cover, or are
there indications of ponding?
Are the perimeter drainage and
infiltration trench functioning?
Are the chains and locks in good
condition?
Does the vegetation on the cover
appear stressed?
OTHER
Are there indications of the presence
of chemicals (e.g., soil discoloration,
odor)?

VEGETATED COVER INTEGRITY
Are there signs of erosion on the
cover?
Are there signs of animals burrowing
in the cover?
Are the fences intact and free of holes
or tears?

SITE SECURITY
Are the gates shut and locked?
-tuar+ . Clair
12/29/20/7
Operation, Maintenance and Monitoring Plan for the
T H Agriculture & Nutrition Site, Eastern Fresno County, California g:ls-groupladrinobi841844083.8]_thank09repoxslomsmphkableskzbeOT.doc Table 1: Inspection Record Form for Soil Component of
Final Remedy
Kennedy Jenks Consultants
G
Inspector: Signature: Ltuk . Can
Date: Page: ' of I 8 I
Yes No Comments
X
X
Bollards in good condition?
N/A
Additional observations:

During spring inspection:

A-zone wells sounded to
monitor for resaturation?
Casing and screen
undamaged?
Well cap and padlock present
and secure?
Protective well cover in good
condition?
Operation, Maintenance and Monitoring Plan for the
T H Agriculture & Nutrition Site, Eastern Fresno County, California Table 2: Inspection Record Form for Groundwater
Component of Final Remedy
-Stua+ t. Clair
12/29/2017
Item
Well identification markings
intact?

APPENDIX B

GROUNDWATER MONITORING FIELD
FORMS

DAILY FIELD REPORT
t

Field Rep.: Chad Neptune
Weather: Warm, clear skies w/winds from the west, temp~ 80 Degrees F M:_ADMIN & SOP\URS Fresno Templates \Forms-FSO\DAILY FIELD REPORT.doc URS Date:
10/3/17
TIME
1000
1315
1400
Day of Week:

Tueday
Job Name:

THAN GW Monitoring 2017
Job Number:
60549271.6699018
__________________ ACTIVITIES/COMMENTS
Leave office for storage, west air, lab and then to site.

Arrive on site to begin sounding wells.____________
Finished sounding wells, done on site for the day.

DAILY FIELD REPORT
Page__ _1_ of 1
Weather:Warm, clear skies w/winds from the west, temp~ 80 Degrees F M:\_ADMIN & SOP\URS Fresno Templates \Forms-FSOWDAILY FIELD REPORT.doc URS Day of Week:

Wednesday
Date:
10/4/17
1200
1212
1351
1445
1245
1310
TIME
0800
0830
0835
1035
1107
1145
Job Number:
60549271.6699018
Heading to 184 to being sampling
Setting up to sample at 184-C1
Field Rep.: Chad Neptune
Job Name:

THAN GW Monitoring 2017
Sampled 184-C1, move to 184-D1________________________________ Finished sampling @ 184-D1, head to lab to submit samples, done on site. ___________________ACTIVITIES/COMMENTS________________
Arrive on site, assemble tubing and pump for 154-B1_______________ Install pump into well @ 154-B1 ______________________________ Begin setting up for well sampling, fill out container labels for samples.

Begin sampling at 154-B1____________________________________ Begin sampling at 154-C1____________________________________ Done sampling at 154-C1, move to domestic well 3027 for sample collection._________________________________________________ Arrive at 3027._____________________________________________ Begin purge at 3027, pump ran for 7 minutes during 15 minute purge.

Sample collected at 1227. Temp= 24.9°, EC=394, pH=7.78.

DAILY FIELD REPORT
Weather: Warm, clear skies w/winds from the west, temp- 80 Degrees F M:\ADMIN & SOP URS Fresno Templates \Forms-FSO\DAILY FIELD REPORT.doc URS Date:
10/5/17
Day of Week:

THURSDAY
Job Number:
60549271.6699018
TIME
0830
0915
0944
1024
1030
1145
1254
1345
1430
1500
1530
1600

Field Rep.: Chad Neptune
Job Name:

THAN GW Monitoring 2017
___________________ACTIVITIES/COMMENTS__________________ Arrive on site, assemble tubing and prep to sample at 151-B1__________ Finished sampling @151-B1, begin sampling @ 151-Cl_______________ Finished sampling @151-C1, begin sampling @ 150-C1______________ Finished sampling @ 150-C1, begin sampling @ 150-B1______________ 150-B1 not producing water, pulled pump from well, tubing have partially detached from pump from cracking and material fatigue. Tubing was trimmed, reattached to pump and pump was reinserted in to the wellFinished sampling @151-B1, begin sampling @ 29-B Finished sampling @ 29-B, begin sampling @ 183-B1________________ Finished sampling @ 183-B1, collect field blank and trip blank.________ Finished on site, head to westair to return nitrogen gas cylinders.________ Finished @ Westair, head to lab to submit samples.__________________ Done at lab, return to office to unload truck.______________________ Arrive at office.

DAILY FIELD REPORT
Weather: Warm, clear skies w/winds from the west, temp~ 70 Degrees F https:/laecom-my. sharepoint com/personal/chad_neptune_aecom_com/Documents/THAN 2017/DFR/10-30-17 THAN DAILY FIELD REPOR URS
Day of Week:

Monday
Date:
10/30/17
TIME
0945
1000
1015
1039
1054
1121
1136
1220
1245
1315
Job Number:
60549271.6699018

Field Rep.: Chad Neptune
Job Name:

THAN GW Monitoring 2017
____________________ACTIVITIES/COMMENTS__________________ Arrive at domestic well 3025, speak with resident to allow sampling Begin purging well for 15 minutes._________________________________ Collect sample @ 3025, water quality parameters: pH =7.25 , EC=440 , Temp=20.2, well pump ran for about 7 minutes_______________________ Begin purge at domestic well 1017_______________________ _____ Collect samples @ 1017, water quality parameters: pH=7.38 , EC=489 , Temp=22.0 , Well pump ran for about 5 minutes.______________________ Begin 15 min purge at well 3022._________________________ Collect sample @ 3022, Water quality parameters: pH=7.48 , EC= 400, Temp=21.5 , pump ran for ~5 min during purge.______________________ Collect field blank, head for lab.___________________________________ Drop samples off at lab, head to office____________________________ Arrive at office.
153-C1
153-C1
153-C1
153-C1
153-C1

0.04 154-B1 0.04
154-B1 0.04
154-B1 0.05
154-B1 0.05

0.088

0.089

0.097 Y
13-Dec-1992
4-Nov-1987 0.16
DBCP
DBCP
DBCP
DBCP
DBCP
DBCP
DBCP
DBCP

0.04 0.04

0.04 154-B1
154-B1
154-B1
154-B1
154-B1
154-B1
154-B1
154-B1
154-B1
154-B1
154-B1
154-B1
154-B1
154-B1
154-B1
154-B1
154-B1
154-B1
154-B1
154-B1
154-B1
154-B1
6-Aug-2005
18-Dec-2005
13-May-2006
13-Dec-2006
153-C1
153-C1
153-C1
153-C1
153-C1
153-C1

34.00 42.20

73.80 109.00

66.00 6.00
153-C1
153-C1
153-C1
153-C1
12-May-2007
26-Sep-2007
4-May-2008
14-Jun-2009
12-Nov-2015

0.14 0.13

0.05 0.05

0.07 0.08

0.13 153-C1
154-B1

0.39 J

0.05 0.10

0.08 0.055

0.032

0.028

1.6 27-Jun-1996
5-Sep-1996
5-Sep-1996
ll-May-1997
6-Dec-1997
19-Oct-1995
19-Oct-1995
30-Jul-1987
15-Apr-1988
15-Apr-1988
15-Jul-1988
17-Oct-1988
18-Sep-1989
5-Sep-1996
3-Dec-1998
18-Jun-1999
18-Dec-1999
29-Apr-2000
24-Oct-2000
13-Apr-2001
30-Sep-2001
17-Feb-2002
30-Jul-2002
10-Feb-2003
14-Sep-2003
16-May-2004
7-Dec-2004
30-Sep-2001
30-Jul-1987
Date
Sampled
4-Apr-1995
19-Oct-1995
19-Oct-1995
16-Apr-1996
27-Jun-1996
DBCP
DCPA acid metabolites
DCPA acid metabolites
Di-n-butylphthalate
Di-n-butylphthalate
Di-n-butylphthalate
Di-n-butylphthalate
Di-n-butylphthalate
Scan #664
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE
Chloromethane
Chloromethane
DBCP
DBCP
Well
Name
153-C1
153-C1
Compound
DBCP
Concentration
(ug/L)

3.4 2.1

2.7 2.5

2.0 1.9

2.5 2.58

1.4 1.2

0.24 0.19

APPENDIX C

HISTORICAL CHEMICAL DETECTIONS IN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES
T H Agriculture and Nutrition Site, Fresno County, CA

Well
Name
154-B1
DBCP 0.20
DBCP 0.25
DBCP
DBCP
154-B1

0.46 0.23

0.07 154-B1
154-B1
154-B1

0.12 DBCP
DBCP
154-B1
154-B1
154-B1
154-C1
154-C1
154-C1 0.04

0.04 0.05
154-C1 0.06
DBCP
DBCP
154-B1
154-B1
DBCP
DBCP
DBCP
DBCP
DBCP
DBCP
154-B1
154-B1
154-B1
154-B1
154-B1
154-B1
DBCP
DBCP
DBCP
DBCP
DBCP
DBCP
DBCP
DBCP
DBCP
DBCP
DBCP
DBCP
DBCP
DBCP
154-B1
154-B1

0.04 0.03

0.05 0.03

0.02 154-B1
154-B1
154-B1
154-B1
154-B1
154-B1
154-B1
154-B1
154-B1
6-Dec-1997
16-Jun-1998
3-Dec-1998
18-Jun-1999

0.05 0.04
154-C1
154-C1
154-C1
154-C1
154-C1
154-B1
154-B1
154-B1
154-B1
154-B1
154-B1
154-B1
154-B1
154-B1

0.02 6.20

60.00 27.60

0.50 0.09

0.06 0.05

0.01 0.02

0.04 0.04

0.04 0.06

0.04 0.09

0.13 0.17

0.18 0.14

0.10 0.18

0.12 0.09

0.13 0.11
18-Dec-1999
29-Apr-2000
24-Oct-2000
13-Apr-2001
30-Sep-2001
12-Jun-1989
18-Sep-1989
18-Dec-1989
27-Mar-1990
25-Jun-1990
2-Oct-1990
10-Dec-1990
10-Mar-1991
5-Jun-1991
10-Sep-1991
15-Dec-1991
24-Mar-1992
24-Jun-1992
16-Sep-1992
13-Dec-1992
16-Mar-1993
13-Jun-1993
21-Sep-1993
6-Dec-1993
l-Mar-1994
6-Jun-1994
13-Sep-1994
5-Dec-1994
3-Apr-1995
15-Jan-1988
17-Oct-1988
12-Jun-1989
10-Dec-1990
15-Apr-1988
15-Jul-1988
15-Jul-1988
17-OCM988
17-Oct-1988
3-Jan-1989
3-Jan-1989
Date
Sampled
15-Jan-1988
DBCP
DBCP
Di-n-butylphthalate
Di-n-butylphthalate
Di-n-butylphthalate
Trifluralin
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
Compound
DBCP
DBCP
Concentration
(ug/L)

0.13 0.27

APPENDIX C

HISTORICAL CHEMICAL DETECTIONS IN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES
T H Agriculture and Nutrition Site, Fresno County, CA

Well
Name
154-C1
154-C1
154-C1
154-C1
154-C1
154-C1
154-C1
154-C1
154-C1
154-C1
154-C1
154-C1
154-C1
154-C1
154-C1
154-C1
154-C1
154-C1
154-C1
154-C1
154-C1
154-C1
154-C1
154-Cl
154-Cl
154-Cl
154-Cl
154-Cl
154-Cl
154-Cl
154-Cl
154-Cl
154-Cl
154-Cl
154-Cl
154-Cl
154-Cl
154-Cl
154-Cl
154-Cl
154-Cl
154-Cl
154-Cl
154-Cl
154-Cl
Date
Sampled
17-Feb-2002
30-Jul-2002
10-Feb-2003
14-Sep-2003
16-May-2004
7-Dec-2004
6-Aug-2005
18-Dec-2005
13-May-2006
13-Dec-2006
12-May-2007
26-Sep-2007
4-May-2008
14-Jun-2009
23-Jun-2010
20-Jul-2011
16-May-2012
17-Jul-2013
12-Nov-2015
12-Nov-2015
25-Aug-2016
10-Dec-1990
30-Jul-1987
25-Jun-1990
3O-Sep-2OO1
30-Jul-1987
4-Nov-1987
15-Jan-1988
15-Jan-1988
15-Apr-1988
15-Apr-1988
15-Jul-1988
17-Oct-1988
3-Jan-1989
12-Jun-1989
18-Sep-1989
18-Dec-1989
27-Mar-1990
25-Jun-1990
2-Oct-1990
10-Dec-1990
10-Mar-1991
10-Mar-1991
5-Jun-1991
10-Sep-1991
Compound
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE
1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE
1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE
1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE
1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE
1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE
Aldrin
Butylbenzylphthalate
Chloroform
Chloromethane
DBCP
DBCP
DBCP
DBCP
DBCP
DBCP
DBCP
DBCP
DBCP
DBCP
DBCP
DBCP
DBCP
DBCP
DBCP
DBCP
DBCP
DBCP
DBCP
DBCP
Concentration
(ug/L)

0.05 0.05

0.06 0.07

0.07 0.061

0.055

0.055

0.60 0.054 Y

0.068

0.036

0.07 0.06

0.047

0.041

0.029

0.033

0.045

0.036

0.028

0.09 306.00

1.90 0.58

0.32 0.45

0.21 0.23

0.26 0.26

0.45 0.21

0.12 0.19

0.32 0.17

0.10 0.12

0.18 0.15

0.13 0.13

0.13 0.09

APPENDIX C

HISTORICAL CHEMICAL DETECTIONS IN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES
T H Agriculture and Nutrition Site, Fresno County, CA

DBCP
DBCP
154-Cl 0.13
154-Cl 0.15

0.13 154-Cl 0.14
154-Cl 0.12
DBCP

0.02 DBCP

2.30 155-Al 0.02
155-Al
155-Al 17-Oct-1988 1.20
DBCP
DBCP
DBCP
DBCP
DBCP
DBCP
DBCP
DBCP
DBCP
DBCP
DBCP
DBCP
DBCP
DBCP
DBCP
DBCP
DBCP
DBCP
DBCP
DBCP
DBCP
DBCP
DBCP
DBCP

0.09 0.10
155-Al
155-Al
154-Cl
154-Cl
154-Cl
154-Cl
154-Cl
154-Cl
154-Cl
154-Cl
154-Cl

0.03 0.016 J

0.02 J

0.01 J

0.01 J

0.01 J

0.01 J
522.00

23.20 29.40

0.06 0.93

0.16 0.07

30.00 0.10

0.14 154-Cl
154-Cl
154-Cl
154-Cl
154-Cl
154-Cl
154-Cl
154-Cl
154-Cl
154-Cl

0.48 1.00
200.00

0.16 154-Cl
154-Cl
154-Cl
154-Cl
154-Cl
154-Cl
154-Cl
154-Cl
154-Cl
154-Cl
154-Cl
154-Cl
155-Al
155-Al
155-Al
155-Al
155-Al

0.11 0.08

0.07 0.07

0.07 0.10

0.04 0.03

0.03 0.13

0.10 0.14
Well
Name
16-Sep-1992
13-Dec-1992
16-Mar-1993
13-Jun-1993
21-Sep-1993
6-Dec-1993
l-Mar-1994
6-Jun-1994
13-Sep-1994
5-Dec-1994
3-Apr-1995
16-Oct-1995
15-Apr-1996
24-Jun-1996
7-May-1997
6-Dec-1997
16-Jun-1998
3-Dec-1998
18-Jun-1999
18-Dec-1999
29-Apr-2000
24-Oct-2000
30-Sep-2001
17-Feb-2002
30-Jul-2002
14-Sep-2003
16-May-2004
30-Jul-1987
15-Jul-1988
12-Jun-1989
10-Dec-1990
10-Dec-1990
17-Oct-1988
10-Sep-1991
10-Sep-1991
17-Oct-1988
17-Oct-1988
10-Sep-1991
10-Sep-1991
10-Sep-1991
17-Oct-1988
DBCP
d-BHC
Dieldrin
Di-n-butylphthalate
Dinoseb (DNBP)
Date
Sampled
15-Dec-1991
24-Mar-1992
24-Jun-1992
DBCP
Di-n-butylphthalate
Di-n-butylphthalate
Di-n-butylphthalate
Heptachlor
Trifluralin
1,2-Dichloroethane
b-BHC
Bromacil
Chloroform
DBCP
Compound
DBCP
Concentration
(ug/L)

0.15 APPENDIX C

HISTORICAL CHEMICAL DETECTIONS IN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES
T H Agriculture and Nutrition Site, Fresno County, CA

I
qney4
Department of Toxic Substances Control
April 16,2019
Dear Ms. Barker;
2017/18 ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT: T H AGRICULTURE & NUTRITION SITE, 7182 E. MCKINLEY AVENUE, FRESNO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Gavin Newsom
Governor
DD:smk
DD06.0419
Ms. Shau-Luen Barker
Project Realty, LLC
15313 West 95th Street
Lenexa, Kansas 66219
Results of the site and capped area inspection indicates that integrity of the cap, the site fencing and infiltration trench has not been compromised and that no maintenance were required. Additionally, groundwater monitoring wells located on site were inspected and found to be in good condition.

The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) has reviewed the Annual Monitoring Report (Report) dated March 2018 for the TH Agriculture & Nutrition site (Site) located in Fresno County, California. The Report presents the findings of the semi-annual inspection and maintenance of the site, the capped area within the site, and the annual groundwater monitoring activities.

The groundwater monitoring activities involved the sampling of 10 monitoring wells and five domestic wells. The monitoring wells and domestic wells were analyzed for the chemicals of concern, 1,2-DCA, carbon tetrachloride, Dieldrin, and Chloroform. The Final Remedial Goals for 1,2-DCA, carbon tetrachloride, Dieldrin, and Chloroform are

0.5 micrograms per liter (ug/L), 0.5 ug/L, 0.3 ug/L, and 80 ug/L respectively. Chloroform was detected at concentration of 1.2 ug/L in two monitoring wells (184-CI and 184-DI) concentrations below the Final Remedial Goals (FRG), and was not detected in any domestic wells. Dieldrin was detected at a concentration of 0.035 ug/L in only one monitoring well (183-B 1) ata concentration below the FRG, and was not detected in any domestic wells. The results of the groundwater monitoring remained similar to previous annual groundwater monitoring results.

Jared Blumenfeld
Secretary for
Environmental Protection
Meredith Williams, Ph.D.

Acting Director
1515 Tollhouse Road
Clovis, California 93611-0522
Sinc
Enclosures;
cc:

DD:smk
DD06.0419
Mr. Stuart St. Clair PE
URS Corporation
30 River Park Place West, Suite 180
Fresno, California 93720-1539
Via Email
Mr. Joseph Tapia PE
Department of Toxic Substances Control
Mr. Russell Walls PE
Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board
Fresno Office
1685 "E" Street
Fresno, CA 93706-2007
The annual report is included as part of the 3rd Five Year Review, which is currently under review. DTSC hereby approves Annual Monitoring Report for 2017/18. If you have any questions, please contact me, Danny Domingo, at (559) 297-3932, or Joseph Tapia at (559) 297-3977.

Ms. Shau-Luen Barker
April 16, 2019

A—. le_(
1 / 0 -
Danny G. Domingo P.G.

Engineering Geologist
San Joaquin and Legacy Landfill
Department of Toxic Substances Control
Contact:

DTSC Certifies Cleanup at Former T H Agriculture & Nutrition Site in Fresno ###
The THAN site was cleaned up to an industrial/commercial-use level and will require continued monitoring of groundwater contamination. A land-use restriction has been put in place that will transfer with the deed of sale to all subsequent owners. To fund the continued operations, maintenance and monitoring of the site, financial arrangements have been made. These safeguards will ensure the long-term protection of public health and the environment.

Carol Singleton
916.255.6578
Ron Baker
916.324.3142
To view the documents associated with this cleanup, visit DTSC’s Website at www.dtsc.ca.gov.

The former T H Agriculture & Nutrition site (THAN), located at 7183 East McKinley Avenue in Fresno, is a 5.5-acre site previously used for the formulation, packaging and storage of agricultural chemicals (pesticides) from 1951 to 1981. THAN owned or operated the site from 1959 to 1981.

They discontinued operations in 1981 and closed the plant completely in 1983.

Remediating the site involved providing an alternative water supply to affected parties, demolition of on-site structures, soil excavation with off-site disposal, and removal of volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds through vapor extraction and treatment.

The EPA has reviewed the work conducted at the site and has concluded that the site now can be delisted from the National Priorities List.

Fresno - “We are pleased to announce the certification the former T H Agriculture & Nutrition site in Fresno, which was on the National Priorities List (NPL). DTSC served as the lead regulatory agency and now the site can be used for commercial or industrial activities,” said Maureen Gorsen, Director of the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC).

DTSC investigated the property in 1987, found significant soil and groundwater contamination and ordered a cleanup. The contaminants of concern included dichloroethane, carbon tetrachloride, chloroform and trichloropropane contaminants.

T-16-06
For Immediate Release
Tuesday, May 09, 2006

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NEWS RELEASE
The Department of Toxic Substances Control’s mission is to restore, protect, and enhance the environment and ensure public health, environmental quality and economic vitality by regulating hazardous waste, conducting and overseeing cleanups, and developing and promoting pollution prevention.

FORM-LBC-KKT
The EDR Radius Map™ Report with GeoCheck®
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
McKinley Ranch Property
7298 E McKinley Avenue
Fresno, CA 93737
Inquiry Number: 7545227.2s
January 19, 2024
EDR

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION PAGE
Executive Summary ES1
Overview Map 2
Detail Map 3
Map Findings Summary 4
Map Findings 9
Orphan Summary 70
Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking GR-1

GEOCHECK ADDENDUM
Physical Setting Source Addendum A-1
Physical Setting Source Summary A-2
Physical Setting SSURGO Soil Map A-5
Physical Setting Source Map A-11
Physical Setting Source Map Findings A-13
Physical Setting Source Records Searched PSGR-1
Thank you for your business.

Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.

Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, LLC. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. This Report is provided on an "AS IS", "AS AVAILABLE" basis. NO WARRANTY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, LLC AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES,

AFFILIATES AND THIRD PARTY SUPPLIERS DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, OF ANY KIND OR NATURE, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,

ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS REPORT OR ANY OF THE DATA AND INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS REPORT,

INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES REGARDING ACCURACY, QUALITY, CORRECTNESS, COMPLETENESS,

COMPREHENSIVENESS, SUITABILITY, MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, TITLE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, MISAPPROPRIATION, OR OTHERWISE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA

RESOURCES, LLC OR ITS SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES OR THIRD PARTY SUPPLIERS BE LIABLE TO ANYONE FOR ANY DIRECT,

INCIDENTAL, INDIRECT, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR OTHER DAMAGES OF ANY TYPE OR KIND (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO LOSS OF PROFITS, LOSS OF USE, OR LOSS OF DATA) INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS REPORT. Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels, or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property.

Only an assessment performed by a qualified environmental professional can provide findings, opinions or conclusions regarding the environmental risk or conditions in, on or at any property.

Copyright 2024 by Environmental Data Resources, LLC. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, LLC, or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.

EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, LLC or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.

TC7545227.2s Page 1
1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC7545227.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1
A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR).

The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA’s Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments (E1527 - 21), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments for Forestland or Rural Property (E2247 - 16), the ASTM Standard Practice for Limited Environmental Due Diligence: Transaction Screen Process (E1528 - 22) or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate.

TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION

ADDRESS
7298 E MCKINLEY AVENUE
FRESNO, CA 93737

COORDINATES
Latitude (North): 36.7666920 - 36˚ 46’ 0.09’’
Longitude (West): 119.6583840 - 119˚ 39’ 30.18’’
Universal Tranverse Mercator: Zone 11
UTM X (Meters): 262716.6
UTM Y (Meters): 4072085.0
Elevation: 352 ft. above sea level

USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY
Target Property Map: 50005747 CLOVIS, CA
Version Date: 2021
South Map: 50005800 MALAGA, CA
Version Date: 2021

AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT
Portions of Photo from: 20200705
Source: USDA
1 7545227.2s Page 2
18 SHIELDS-LOCAN ELEMEN NORTHEAST OF SHIELDS ENVIROSTOR, SCH Higher 5099, 0.966, NNE 17 CLOVIS USD - PROPOSE SE INTERSECTION OF T ENVIROSTOR, SCH Lower 1329, 0.252, NW 16 CITY OF FRESNO WELL 2176 N TEMPERANCE AV CUPA Listings Lower 1304, 0.247, WNW E15 KB HOMES SOUTH BAY I 2044 N TEMPERANCE AV RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 1262, 0.239, West E14 KB HOMES SOUTH BAY I 2044 N TEMPERANCE AV CUPA Listings, HWTS, HAZNET Lower 1262, 0.239, West E13 KB HOMES SOUTH BAY, 2044 N TEMPERANCE AV RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 1262, 0.239, West 12 BASIN RCB 7616 E MCKINLEY AVE CUPA Listings, HWTS, HAZNET Lower 883, 0.167, ESE D11 T-MOBILE CELL SITE S 7099 E MCKINLEY AVE CUPA Listings Lower 832, 0.158, WSW D10 VERIZON WIRELESS TEM 7101 E MCKINLEY AVE CUPA Listings Lower 830, 0.157, WSW B9 TH AGRICULTURE & NUT 7183 E MCKINLEY AVE WMUDS/SWAT Lower 425, 0.080, SW B8 T.H. AGRICULTURE AND MCKINLEY AVE WMUDS/SWAT Lower 389, 0.074, SW C7 TH AGRICULTURE & NUT 7183 E MCKINLEY AVE SWF/LF, HWTS Lower 297, 0.056, SSW C6 T H AGRICULTURE & NU 7183 EAST MCKINLEY A ENVIROSTOR, HIST Cal-Sites, DEED, CA BOND EXP.... Lower 297, 0.056, SSW C5 T.H. AGRICULTURE & N 7183 E MCKINLEY AVE Delisted NPL, SEMS, RCRA-SQG, US ENG CONTROLS, US... Lower 297, 0.056, SSW B4 KB HOMES SOUTH BAY I 7190 E MCKINLEY AVE RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 191, 0.036, SW A3 KATHRYN ZANINOVICH P 7298 E MCKINLEY AVE CUPA Listings TP A2 VINCE ZANINOVICH 7298 E MCKINLEY AVE HWTS, HAZNET TP A1 CATHERINE ZANINODICH 7298 E MCKINLEY AVE HWTS, HAZNET TP

MAPPED SITES SUMMARY
Target Property Address:
7298 E MCKINLEY AVENUE
FRESNO, CA 93727
Click on Map ID to see full detail.

MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.)

ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTION SITE NAME ADDRESS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC7545227.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3

TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS
The target property was identified in the following records. For more information on this property see page 9 of the attached EDR Radius Map report:

Site Database(s) EPA ID

CATHERINE ZANINODICH
7298 E MCKINLEY AVE
FRESNO, CA 93727

HWTS N/A
HAZNET
GEPAID: CAC002602481

VINCE ZANINOVICH
7298 E MCKINLEY AVE
FRESNO, CA 93727

HWTS N/A
HAZNET
GEPAID: CAC002620996

KATHRYN ZANINOVICH P
7298 E MCKINLEY AVE
FRESNO, CA 93727
CUPA Listings N/A
Database: CUPA FRESNO, Date of Government Version: 06/28/2021 Facility Id: FA0278535

DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES
No mapped sites were found in EDR’s search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the following databases:

STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Lists of Federal NPL (Superfund) sites
NPL National Priority List
Proposed NPL Proposed National Priority List Sites
NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens
Lists of Federal sites subject to CERCLA removals and CERCLA orders FEDERAL FACILITY Federal Facility Site Information listing Lists of Federal CERCLA sites with NFRAP
SEMS-ARCHIVE Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive Lists of Federal RCRA facilities undergoing Corrective Action CORRACTS Corrective Action Report
Lists of Federal RCRA TSD facilities
RCRA-TSDF RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal
1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC7545227.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4
Lists of Federal RCRA generators
RCRA-LQG RCRA - Large Quantity Generators
RCRA-VSQG RCRA - Very Small Quantity Generators (Formerly Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators)
Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries LUCIS Land Use Control Information System
Federal ERNS list
ERNS Emergency Response Notification System
Lists of state- and tribal (Superfund) equivalent sites RESPONSE State Response Sites
Lists of state and tribal leaking storage tanks
LUST Geotracker’s Leaking Underground Fuel Tank Report
INDIAN LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Lists of state and tribal registered storage tanks
FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing
UST Active UST Facilities
AST Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tank Facilities
INDIAN UST Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
Lists of state and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
INDIAN VCP Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
VCP Voluntary Cleanup Program Properties
Lists of state and tribal brownfield sites
BROWNFIELDS Considered Brownfieds Sites Listing

ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfields Sites
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites
SWRCY Recycler Database
HAULERS Registered Waste Tire Haulers Listing
INDIAN ODI Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands DEBRIS REGION 9 Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations ODI Open Dump Inventory
IHS OPEN DUMPS Open Dumps on Indian Land
1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC7545227.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5
Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL Delisted National Clandestine Laboratory Register SCH School Property Evaluation Program
CDL Clandestine Drug Labs
CERS HAZ WASTE California Environmental Reporting System Hazardous Waste Toxic Pits Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Sites
US CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register
Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks
SWEEPS UST SWEEPS UST Listing
HIST UST Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database CA FID UST Facility Inventory Database
CERS TANKS California Environmental Reporting System (CERS) Tanks Local Land Records
LIENS Environmental Liens Listing
LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien Information
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
CHMIRS California Hazardous Material Incident Report System LDS Land Disposal Sites Listing
MCS Military Cleanup Sites Listing
SPILLS 90 SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch
Other Ascertainable Records
FUDS Formerly Used Defense Sites
DOD Department of Defense Sites
SCRD DRYCLEANERS State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing US FIN ASSUR Financial Assurance Information

EPA WATCH LIST EPA WATCH LIST
2020 COR ACTION 2020 Corrective Action Program List
TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act
TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
SSTS Section 7 Tracking Systems
RMP Risk Management Plans
RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
PRP Potentially Responsible Parties
PADS PCB Activity Database System
ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System
FTTS FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System
COAL ASH DOE Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data
COAL ASH EPA Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List PCB TRANSFORMER PCB Transformer Registration Database
RADINFO Radiation Information Database
HIST FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing DOT OPS Incident and Accident Data
1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC7545227.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6
CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
INDIAN RESERV Indian Reservations
FUSRAP Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program
UMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
LEAD SMELTERS Lead Smelter Sites
US AIRS Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem US MINES Mines Master Index File
MINES MRDS Mineral Resources Data System
ABANDONED MINES Abandoned Mines
FINDS Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
DOCKET HWC Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing
UXO Unexploded Ordnance Sites
ECHO Enforcement & Compliance History Information
FUELS PROGRAM EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing
PFAS NPL Superfund Sites with PFAS Detections Information PFAS FEDERAL SITES Federal Sites PFAS Information
PFAS TRIS List of PFAS Added to the TRI
PFAS TSCA PFAS Manufacture and Imports Information
PFAS RCRA MANIFEST PFAS Transfers Identified In the RCRA Database Listing PFAS ATSDR PFAS Contamination Site Location Listing
PFAS WQP Ambient Environmental Sampling for PFAS
PFAS NPDES Clean Water Act Discharge Monitoring Information PFAS ECHO Facilities in Industries that May Be Handling PFAS Listing PFAS ECHO FIRE TRAINING Facilities in Industries that May Be Handling PFAS Listing PFAS PART 139 AIRPORT All Certified Part 139 Airports PFAS Information Listing AQUEOUS FOAM NRC Aqueous Foam Related Incidents Listing BIOSOLIDS ICIS-NPDES Biosolids Facility Data
PFAS PFAS Contamination Site Location Listing
AQUEOUS FOAM Former Fire Training Facility Assessments Listing CHROME PLATING Chrome Plating Facilities Listing
DRYCLEANERS Cleaner Facilities
EMI Emissions Inventory Data
ENF Enforcement Action Listing
Financial Assurance Financial Assurance Information Listing ICE Inspection, Compliance and Enforcement
HIST CORTESE Hazardous Waste & Substance Site List
HWP EnviroStor Permitted Facilities Listing
HWT Registered Hazardous Waste Transporter Database
MINES Mines Site Location Listing
MWMP Medical Waste Management Program Listing
NPDES NPDES Permits Listing
PEST LIC Pesticide Regulation Licenses Listing
PROC Certified Processors Database
Notify 65 Proposition 65 Records
HAZMAT Hazardous Material Facilities
UIC UIC Listing

UIC GEO UIC GEO (GEOTRACKER)
WASTEWATER PITS Oil Wastewater Pits Listing
WDS Waste Discharge System
WIP Well Investigation Program Case List

MILITARY PRIV SITES MILITARY PRIV SITES (GEOTRACKER)

PROJECT PROJECT (GEOTRACKER)
WDR Waste Discharge Requirements Listing
CIWQS California Integrated Water Quality System

CERS CERS
1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC7545227.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7

NON-CASE INFO NON-CASE INFO (GEOTRACKER)

OTHER OIL GAS OTHER OIL & GAS (GEOTRACKER)

PROD WATER PONDS PROD WATER PONDS (GEOTRACKER)

SAMPLING POINT SAMPLING POINT (GEOTRACKER)
WELL STIM PROJ Well Stimulation Project (GEOTRACKER)
UST FINDER RELEASE UST Finder Releases Database
UST FINDER UST Finder Database

EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
EDR Hist Auto EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations
EDR Hist Cleaner EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners

EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
RGA LF Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List RGA LUST Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS
Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases.

Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property.

Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed data on individual sites can be reviewed.

Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases.

Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis.

STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Lists of Federal Delisted NPL sites
Delisted NPL: The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate.

A review of the Delisted NPL list, as provided by EDR, and dated 09/19/2023 has revealed that there is 1 Delisted NPL site within approximately 1 mile of the target property.

Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ T.H. AGRICULTURE & N 7183 E MCKINLEY AVE SSW 0 - 1/8 (0.056 mi.) C5 15 EPA ID:: CAD009106220
1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC7545227.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8
Site ID:: 901128
Lists of Federal sites subject to CERCLA removals and CERCLA orders SEMS: SEMS (Superfund Enterprise Management System) tracks hazardous waste sites, potentially hazardous waste sites, and remedial activities performed in support of EPA’s Superfund Program across the United States. The list was formerly know as CERCLIS, renamed to SEMS by the EPA in 2015. The list contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). This dataset also contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and the sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL.

A review of the SEMS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 09/19/2023 has revealed that there is 1 SEMS site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.

Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ T.H. AGRICULTURE & N 7183 E MCKINLEY AVE SSW 0 - 1/8 (0.056 mi.) C5 15 Site ID: 0901128
EPA Id: CAD009106220
Lists of Federal RCRA generators
RCRA-SQG: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month.

A review of the RCRA-SQG list, as provided by EDR, and dated 12/04/2023 has revealed that there is 1 RCRA-SQG site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property.

Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ T.H. AGRICULTURE & N 7183 E MCKINLEY AVE SSW 0 - 1/8 (0.056 mi.) C5 15 EPA ID:: CAD009106220
Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries US ENG CONTROLS: A listing of sites with engineering controls in place.

A review of the US ENG CONTROLS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 08/21/2023 has revealed that there is 1 US ENG CONTROLS site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.

Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ T.H. AGRICULTURE & N 7183 E MCKINLEY AVE SSW 0 - 1/8 (0.056 mi.) C5 15 EPA ID:: CAD009106220
1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC7545227.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9
EPA ID:: CAD009106220
US INST CONTROLS: A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures, such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally required as part of the institutional controls.

A review of the US INST CONTROLS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 08/21/2023 has revealed that there is 1 US INST CONTROLS site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.

Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ T.H. AGRICULTURE & N 7183 E MCKINLEY AVE SSW 0 - 1/8 (0.056 mi.) C5 15 EPA ID:: CAD009106220
Lists of state- and tribal hazardous waste facilities
ENVIROSTOR: The Department of Toxic Substances Control’s (DTSC’s) Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program’s (SMBRP’s) EnviroStor database identifes sites that have known contamination or sites for which there may be reasons to investigate further. The database includes the following site types: Federal Superfund sites (National Priorities List (NPL)); State Response, including Military Facilities and State Superfund; Voluntary Cleanup; and School sites. EnviroStor provides similar information to the information that was available in CalSites, and provides additional site information, including, but not limited to, identification of formerly-contaminated properties that have been released for reuse, properties where environmental deed restrictions have been recorded to prevent inappropriate land uses, and risk characterization information that is used to assess potential impacts to public health and the environment at contaminated sites.

A review of the ENVIROSTOR list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/23/2023 has revealed that there are 3 ENVIROSTOR sites within approximately 1 mile of the target property.

Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SHIELDS-LOCAN ELEMEN NORTHEAST OF SHIELDS NNE 1/2 - 1 (0.966 mi.) 18 65 Status: No Further Action
Facility Id: 60002633
Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ T H AGRICULTURE & NU 7183 EAST MCKINLEY A SSW 0 - 1/8 (0.056 mi.) C6 29 Status: Certified / Operation & Maintenance
Facility Id: 10280334
CLOVIS USD - PROPOSE SE INTERSECTION OF T NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.252 mi.) 17 62 Status: No Further Action
Facility Id: 60001940
1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC7545227.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 10
Lists of state and tribal landfills and solid waste disposal facilities SWF/LF: The Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites records typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal facilities or landfills in a particular state. The data come from the Integrated Waste Management Board’s Solid Waste Information System (SWIS) database.

A review of the SWF/LF list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there is 1 SWF/LF site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.

Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ TH AGRICULTURE & NUT 7183 E MCKINLEY AVE SSW 0 - 1/8 (0.056 mi.) C7 50 Database: SWF/LF (SWIS), Date of Government Version: 08/07/2023 Facility ID: 10-CR-0042
Operational Status: Closed
Regulation Status: TBD (Pending Investigation)
Lists of state and tribal leaking storage tanks
CPS-SLIC: Cleanup Program Sites (CPS; also known as Site Cleanups [SC] and formerly known as Spills, Leaks, Investigations, and Cleanups [SLIC] sites) included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater.

A review of the CPS-SLIC list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there is 1 CPS-SLIC site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.

Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ T.H. AGRICULTURE & N 7183 E MCKINLEY AVE SSW 0 - 1/8 (0.056 mi.) C5 15 Database: CPS-SLIC, Date of Government Version: 09/05/2023 Global Id: SLT5FQ384331
Facility Status: Completed - Case Closed

ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites
WMUDS/SWAT: The Waste Management Unit Database System is used for program tracking and inventory of waste management units. The source is the State Water Resources Control Board.

A review of the WMUDS/SWAT list, as provided by EDR, and dated 04/01/2000 has revealed that there are 2 WMUDS/SWAT sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.

Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ T.H. AGRICULTURE AND MCKINLEY AVE SW 0 - 1/8 (0.074 mi.) B8 52 TH AGRICULTURE & NUT 7183 E MCKINLEY AVE SW 0 - 1/8 (0.080 mi.) B9 53 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC7545227.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 11
Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites
HIST Cal-Sites: Formerly known as ASPIS, this database contains both known and potential hazardous substance sites. The source is the California Department of Toxic Substance Control. No longer updated by the state agency. It has been replaced by ENVIROSTOR.

A review of the HIST Cal-Sites list, as provided by EDR, and dated 08/08/2005 has revealed that there is 1 HIST Cal-Sites site within approximately 1 mile of the target property.

Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ T H AGRICULTURE & NU 7183 EAST MCKINLEY A SSW 0 - 1/8 (0.056 mi.) C6 29 Local Land Records
DEED: The use of recorded land use restrictions is one of the methods the DTSC uses to protect the public from unsafe exposures to hazardous substances and wastes .

A review of the DEED list, as provided by EDR, and dated 08/28/2023 has revealed that there is 1 DEED site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.

Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ T H AGRICULTURE & NU 7183 EAST MCKINLEY A SSW 0 - 1/8 (0.056 mi.) C6 29 Status: CERTIFIED / OPERATION & MAINTENANCE
Envirostor ID: 10280334
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste.

A review of the RCRA NonGen / NLR list, as provided by EDR, and dated 12/04/2023 has revealed that there are 3 RCRA NonGen / NLR sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property.

Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ KB HOMES SOUTH BAY I 7190 E MCKINLEY AVE SW 0 - 1/8 (0.036 mi.) B4 12 EPA ID:: CAC003034310
KB HOMES SOUTH BAY, 2044 N TEMPERANCE AV W 1/8 - 1/4 (0.239 mi.) E13 56 EPA ID:: CAC003038473
KB HOMES SOUTH BAY I 2044 N TEMPERANCE AV W 1/8 - 1/4 (0.239 mi.) E15 60 EPA ID:: CAC003034308
1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC7545227.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 12
ROD: Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical and health information to aid the cleanup.

A review of the ROD list, as provided by EDR, and dated 09/19/2023 has revealed that there is 1 ROD site within approximately 1 mile of the target property.

Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ T.H. AGRICULTURE & N 7183 E MCKINLEY AVE SSW 0 - 1/8 (0.056 mi.) C5 15 EPA ID:: CAD009106220
CA BOND EXP. PLAN: Department of Health Services developed a site-specific expenditure plan as the basis for an appropriation of Hazardous Substance Cleanup Bond Act funds. It is not updated.

A review of the CA BOND EXP. PLAN list, as provided by EDR, and dated 01/01/1989 has revealed that there is 1 CA BOND EXP. PLAN site within approximately 1 mile of the target property.

Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ T H AGRICULTURE & NU 7183 EAST MCKINLEY A SSW 0 - 1/8 (0.056 mi.) C6 29 Cortese: The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board (LUST), the Integrated Waste Board (SWF/LS), and the Department of Toxic Substances Control (Cal-Sites).

A review of the Cortese list, as provided by EDR, and dated 09/19/2023 has revealed that there is 1 Cortese site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.

Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ T H AGRICULTURE & NU 7183 EAST MCKINLEY A SSW 0 - 1/8 (0.056 mi.) C6 29 Cleanup Status: CERTIFIED / OPERATION & MAINTENANCE - LAND USE RESTRICTIONS Envirostor Id: 10280334
CUPA Listings: A listing of sites included in the county’s Certified Unified Program Agency database.

California’s Secretary for Environmental Protection established the unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste regulatory program as required by chapter 6.11 of the California Health and Safety Code. The Unified Program consolidates the administration, permits, inspections, and enforcement activities.

A review of the CUPA Listings list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 6 CUPA Listings sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property.

Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ T.H. AGRICULTURE & N 7183 E MCKINLEY AVE SSW 0 - 1/8 (0.056 mi.) C5 15 Database: CUPA FRESNO, Date of Government Version: 06/28/2021 Facility Id: FA0268619
VERIZON WIRELESS TEM 7101 E MCKINLEY AVE WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.157 mi.) D10 54 Database: CUPA FRESNO, Date of Government Version: 06/28/2021 Facility Id: FA0283766
T-MOBILE CELL SITE S 7099 E MCKINLEY AVE WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.158 mi.) D11 54 Database: CUPA FRESNO, Date of Government Version: 06/28/2021 Facility Id: FA0278959
BASIN RCB 7616 E MCKINLEY AVE ESE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.167 mi.) 12 54 Database: CUPA FRESNO, Date of Government Version: 06/28/2021 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC7545227.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 13
Facility Id: FA0270560
KB HOMES SOUTH BAY I 2044 N TEMPERANCE AV W 1/8 - 1/4 (0.239 mi.) E14 58 Database: CUPA FRESNO, Date of Government Version: 06/28/2021 Facility Id: FA0286716
CITY OF FRESNO WELL 2176 N TEMPERANCE AV WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.247 mi.) 16 62 Database: CUPA FRESNO, Date of Government Version: 06/28/2021 Facility Id: FA0284268
1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC7545227.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 14
Due to poor or inadequate address information, the following sites were not mapped. Count: 3 records.

Site Name Database(s)
____________ ____________

AIR NATIONAL GUARD PRP

FOWLER-MCKINLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ENVIROSTOR, SCH

PROPOSED TEMPERANCE ELEMENTARY SCH ENVIROSTOR, SCH
1 EDR Inc.
360
3 3 6 0
OVERVIEW MAP - 7545227.2S
' i - . 5 ■
- S J 0 _
y V
t J
I
102 M. > l ill EHF
—
gYh m’ I 31 il PELA 1
J Ave 5 i e I dE
T W amnas F hr ""I
ejs aI—in" a -1" XI f
T43 >t \
. 1
— I
1 I
Os
J P
/
ha, 1 I
I i nt □
1 an z0.o
W
A J
@5 “ 1 5— — ge f Jfe ral 3
l *
de -
E Mc Ki n ol A v e is EFl
grureen Buhs $)
y
2 S-it rfhimats 4
MI ■■I
P
A. 1
fat ( FLe
Jl'
-
FDTai ser ’ avsi •r w
/
X _
r st } 4 5 f 4
r,, / 119 t E412
-
V
fe I A J

0. &C."2a rE / " 33
1 3 1 ENFa
*
A
J
i
h-" • * —
______ ml Hg f* si1 U
i___ A
1 Miles / Target Property
Areas of Concern
£
SITE NAME: McKinley Ranch Property CLIENT: Krazan & Associates, Inc.

ADDRESS:

LAT/LONG: DATE:
"en
I 3 f t------- --- — 1, l I
3 CONTACT: Ken Sani
INQUIRY#: 7545227.2s
HL
I
I
Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property
Sites at elevations lower than
the target property
Manufactured Gas Plants
This report includes Interactive Map Layers to
display and/or hide map information. The
legend includes only those icons for the
default map view.

L
7298 E McKinley Avenue
Fresno CA 93737

36.766692/119.658384
| | National Priority List Sites
Dept. Defense Sites
A.
3 __
-6 - 12
nd f
»
Y Mt:

Ave
.7
Na
“a
. mil
January 19, 2024 1:09 pm
Copyright © 2024 EDR, Inc. © 2015 TomTom Rei. 2015.

X
gRCPMP
ises H
y
3 o
5 1/4
—
1/2
—
le / C d 4
_____
0 @ ""A •wL
9a Fua
E‘‘t
_ ■ (
21 Indian Reservations BIA
"V Power transmission lines
Special Flood Hazard Area (1%)

0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard
National Wetland Inventory
] State Wetlands
,fs
-
W14
sodcais
—
EDR Inc.

Ay e
71 -I J
r. d
-weri, myyay
«
t
(A
7 ‘4
i
i
I • £ h In
1,’ 5 YrS
/ Ll
a
j
g
*
2—7
MT i/. -amebte
16 7 I®• 9 10 i
/y
3 .B4 —V _ 1 , c K i n I
it 5
/
■ 7
|
a
9:" 1
jWX.
-0-
-87. - N
s
s.
ok__
A —
— 2
wt
^■7/
: 3
3 3
| AT
» / •
-
J6A,"A3 .set Eti”
za------------------------------- ——VV/
plluTOPp US’ ‘It -MHst— Y UL gr ‘UPIh sWusTie L1btt21
\ • - I
\
2rU a
• li —l
9 ME g
ime
BORIS ■ E c1 7 * "W
4 A.

Mat t ‘
—
J
d I ‘id 4r 1
■
-s
*-
1 •
/1 *
h 26 r-l.=
. 3
2170
ne A v <A
* 4
s.

DETAIL MAP - 7545227.2S
0 1/4 Miles / Target Property
Areas of Concern
£
Copyright © 2024 EDR, Inc. @ 2015 TomTom Rei. 2015.

Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property
Sites at elevations lower than
the target property
Manufactured Gas Plants
Sensitive Receptors
This report includes Interactive Map Layers to
display and/or hide map information. The
legend includes only those icons for the
default map view.

D National Priority List Sites
Dept. Defense Sites
X
1/16
—
1/8
—
Indian Reservations BIA
Special Flood Hazard Area (1%)

0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard
SITE NAME: McKinley Ranch Property CLIENT: Krazan & Associates, Inc.

ADDRESS:

LAT/LONG: DATE: January 19, 2024 1:09 pm
CONTACT: Ken Sani
INQUIRY#: 7545227.2s
7298 E McKinley Avenue
Fresno CA 93737

36.766692/119.658384
g "
—_________________________________________ • a
3 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target Total
Database Property (Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted

STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Lists of Federal NPL (Superfund) sites
NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
Proposed NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
NPL LIENS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
Lists of Federal Delisted NPL sites
Delisted NPL 1.000 1 0 0 0 NR 1
Lists of Federal sites subject to
CERCLA removals and CERCLA orders
FEDERAL FACILITY 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
SEMS 0.500 1 0 0 NR NR 1
Lists of Federal CERCLA sites with NFRAP
SEMS-ARCHIVE 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Lists of Federal RCRA facilities
undergoing Corrective Action
CORRACTS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
Lists of Federal RCRA TSD facilities
RCRA-TSDF 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Lists of Federal RCRA generators
RCRA-LQG 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
RCRA-SQG 0.250 1 0 NR NR NR 1
RCRA-VSQG 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
Federal institutional controls /
engineering controls registries
LUCIS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
US ENG CONTROLS 0.500 1 0 0 NR NR 1
US INST CONTROLS 0.500 1 0 0 NR NR 1
Federal ERNS list
ERNS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
Lists of state- and tribal
(Superfund) equivalent sites
RESPONSE 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
Lists of state- and tribal
hazardous waste facilities
ENVIROSTOR 1.000 1 0 1 1 NR 3
Lists of state and tribal landfills
and solid waste disposal facilities
SWF/LF 0.500 1 0 0 NR NR 1
TC7545227.2s Page 4

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target Total
Database Property (Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted Lists of state and tribal leaking storage tanks
LUST 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
INDIAN LUST 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
CPS-SLIC 0.500 1 0 0 NR NR 1
Lists of state and tribal registered storage tanks
FEMA UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
AST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
INDIAN UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
Lists of state and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
INDIAN VCP 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
VCP 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Lists of state and tribal brownfield sites
BROWNFIELDS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0

ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid
Waste Disposal Sites
WMUDS/SWAT 0.500 2 0 0 NR NR 2
SWRCY 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
HAULERS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
INDIAN ODI 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
DEBRIS REGION 9 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
ODI 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
IHS OPEN DUMPS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Local Lists of Hazardous waste /
Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
HIST Cal-Sites 1.000 1 0 0 0 NR 1
SCH 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
CDL 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
CERS HAZ WASTE 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
Toxic Pits 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
US CDL 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks
SWEEPS UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
HIST UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
CA FID UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
CERS TANKS 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
Local Land Records
LIENS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
TC7545227.2s Page 5

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target Total
Database Property (Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted LIENS 2 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
DEED 0.500 1 0 0 NR NR 1
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
CHMIRS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
LDS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
MCS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
SPILLS 90 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen / NLR 0.250 1 2 NR NR NR 3
FUDS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
DOD 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
SCRD DRYCLEANERS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
US FIN ASSUR 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
EPA WATCH LIST 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
2020 COR ACTION 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
TSCA 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
TRIS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
SSTS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
ROD 1.000 1 0 0 0 NR 1
RMP 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
RAATS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
PRP 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
PADS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
ICIS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
FTTS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
MLTS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
COAL ASH DOE 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
COAL ASH EPA 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
PCB TRANSFORMER 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
RADINFO 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
HIST FTTS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
DOT OPS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
CONSENT 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
INDIAN RESERV 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
FUSRAP 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
UMTRA 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
LEAD SMELTERS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
US AIRS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
US MINES 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
MINES MRDS 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
ABANDONED MINES 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
FINDS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
DOCKET HWC 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
UXO 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
ECHO 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
FUELS PROGRAM 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
PFAS NPL 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
PFAS FEDERAL SITES 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
TC7545227.2s Page 6

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target Total
Database Property (Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted PFAS TRIS 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
PFAS TSCA 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
PFAS RCRA MANIFEST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
PFAS ATSDR 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
PFAS WQP 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
PFAS NPDES 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
PFAS ECHO 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
PFAS ECHO FIRE TRAINING 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
PFAS PART 139 AIRPORT 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
AQUEOUS FOAM NRC 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
BIOSOLIDS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
PFAS 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
AQUEOUS FOAM 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
CA BOND EXP. PLAN 1.000 1 0 0 0 NR 1
CHROME PLATING 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Cortese 0.500 1 0 0 NR NR 1
CUPA Listings 0.250 1 1 5 NR NR NR 7
DRYCLEANERS 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
EMI 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
ENF 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
Financial Assurance 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
ICE 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
HIST CORTESE 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
HWP 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
HWT 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
HWTS 0.001 2 0 NR NR NR NR 2
HAZNET 0.001 2 0 NR NR NR NR 2
MINES 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
MWMP 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
NPDES 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
PEST LIC 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
PROC 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Notify 65 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
HAZMAT 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
UIC 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
UIC GEO 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
WASTEWATER PITS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
WDS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
WIP 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
MILITARY PRIV SITES 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
PROJECT 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
WDR 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
CIWQS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
CERS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
NON-CASE INFO 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
OTHER OIL GAS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
PROD WATER PONDS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
SAMPLING POINT 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
WELL STIM PROJ 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
UST FINDER RELEASE 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
UST FINDER 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
TC7545227.2s Page 7

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target Total
Database Property (Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted

EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
EDR Hist Auto 0.125 0 NR NR NR NR 0
EDR Hist Cleaner 0.125 0 NR NR NR NR 0

EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
RGA LF 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
RGA LUST 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
- Totals -- 5 17 7 1 1 0 31
NOTES:

TP = Target Property
NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance
Sites may be listed in more than one database
TC7545227.2s Page 8
Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
Gen EPA ID: CAC002602481
Year: 2006
Additional Info:

Tons: 0.057
Disposal Method: R01 - Recycler
CA Waste Code: 221 - Waste oil and mixed oil
TSD EPA ID: CAL000190816
Gepaid: CAC002602481
Year: 2006
Mailing Address: 7485 N PALM AVE STE 110
Mailing Name: Not reported
Telephone: 5592211271
Contact: JEFF DOUGLAS
City,State,Zip: FRESNO, CA 937279707
Address 2: Not reported
Address: 7298 E MCKINLEY AVE
Name: CATHERINE ZANINODICH
HAZNET:

Longitude: -119.658006
Latitude: 36.764832
Category: STATE
Facility Type: TEMPORARY
Facility Status: Inactive
Contact Fax: Not reported
Contact Phone: Not reported
City,State,Zip: FRESNO, CA 937115764
Contact Address 2: Not reported
Contact Address: 7485 N PALM AVE STE 110
Contact Name: JEFF DOUGLAS
Owner Fax: Not reported
Owner Phone: Not reported
Owner City,State,Zip: FRESNO, CA 937115764
Owner Address 2: Not reported
Owner Address: 7485 N PALM AVE STE 110
Owner Name: CATHERINE ZANINODICH
Mailing City,State,Zip: FRESNO, CA 937115764
Mailing Address 2: Not reported
Mailing Address: 7485 N PALM AVE STE 110
Mailing Name: Not reported
Last Act Date: Not reported
Create Date: 04/13/2006
Inactive Date: 10/11/2006
EPA ID: CAC002602481
City,State,Zip: FRESNO, CA 93727
Address 2: Not reported
Address: 7298 E MCKINLEY AVE
Name: CATHERINE ZANINODICH
HWTS:

Site 1 of 3 in cluster A
Actual:
352 ft.

Property FRESNO, CA 93727
Target 7298 E MCKINLEY AVE HAZNET N/A
A1 CATHERINE ZANINODICH HWTS S112952737
TC7545227.2s Page 9
Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
Additional Code 5: Not reported
Additional Code 4: Not reported
Additional Code 3: Not reported
Additional Code 2: Not reported
Additional Code 1: Not reported
Quantity Unit: G
Waste Quantity: 15
Quantity Tons: 0.057
Meth Code: R01 - Recycler
RCRA Code: Not reported
Waste Code Description: 221 - Waste oil and mixed oil
TSDF Alt Name: Not reported
TSDF Alt EPA ID: Not reported
Trans Name: RIVERBANK OIL TRANSFER LLC
TSDF EPA ID: CAL000190816
Trans 2 Name: Not reported
Trans 2 EPA ID: Not reported
Trans Name: OIL CONSERVATION SERVICE INC
Trans EPA ID: CAD980673842
Manifest ID: 24425973
Receipt Date: 20060421
Creation Date: 8/10/2006 18:36:07
Shipment Date: 20060418
CATHERINE ZANINODICH (Continued) S112952737
Category: STATE
Facility Type: TEMPORARY
Facility Status: Inactive
Contact Fax: Not reported
Contact Phone: Not reported
City,State,Zip: LAGUNA NIGUEL, CA 926775719
Contact Address 2: Not reported
Contact Address: 15 SPRINGBROOK RD
Contact Name: VINCE
Owner Fax: Not reported
Owner Phone: Not reported
Owner City,State,Zip: LAGUNA NIGUEL, CA 926775719
Owner Address 2: Not reported
Owner Address: 15 SPRINGBROOK RD
Owner Name: VINCE ZANINOVICH
Mailing City,State,Zip: LAGUNA NIGUEL, CA 926775719
Mailing Address 2: Not reported
Mailing Address: 15 SPRINGBROOK RD
Mailing Name: Not reported
Last Act Date: Not reported
Create Date: 09/06/2007
Inactive Date: 03/05/2008
EPA ID: CAC002620996
City,State,Zip: FRESNO, CA 93727
Address 2: Not reported
Address: 7298 E MCKINLEY AVE
Name: VINCE ZANINOVICH
HWTS:

Site 2 of 3 in cluster A
Actual:
352 ft.

Property FRESNO, CA 93727
Target 7298 E MCKINLEY AVE HAZNET N/A
A2 VINCE ZANINOVICH HWTS S112964192
TC7545227.2s Page 10
Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
Trans EPA ID: CAT982507154
Manifest ID: 000063532GBF
Receipt Date: 20070913
Creation Date: 1/9/2008 18:30:28
Shipment Date: 20070907
Additional Code 5: Not reported
Additional Code 4: Not reported
Additional Code 3: Not reported
Additional Code 2: Not reported
Additional Code 1: Not reported
Quantity Unit: G
Waste Quantity: 55
Quantity Tons: 0.22935
Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135)
Meth Code: H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--No RCRA Code: Not reported
Waste Code Description: 352 - Other organic solids
TSDF Alt Name: Not reported
TSDF Alt EPA ID: Not reported
Trans Name: RHO CHEM CORPORATION
TSDF EPA ID: CAD008364432
Trans 2 Name: PHILIP WEST INDUSTRIAL SERVICES
Trans 2 EPA ID: CAR000177527
Trans Name: PARC ENVIRONMENTAL
Trans EPA ID: CAT982507154
Manifest ID: 000063532GBF
Receipt Date: 20070913
Creation Date: 1/9/2008 18:30:28
Shipment Date: 20070907
Gen EPA ID: CAC002620996
Year: 2007
Additional Info:

Tons: 0.4587
Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135)
Disposal Method: H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--No CA Waste Code: 352 - Other organic solids
TSD EPA ID: CAD008364432
Gepaid: CAC002620996
Year: 2007
Mailing Address: 15 SPRINGBROOK RD
Mailing Name: Not reported
Telephone: 1747451772
Contact: VINCE
City,State,Zip: FRESNO, CA 937279707
Address 2: Not reported
Address: 7298 E MCKINLEY AVE
Name: VINCE ZANINOVICH
HAZNET:

Longitude: -119.658006
Latitude: 36.764832
VINCE ZANINOVICH (Continued) S112964192
TC7545227.2s Page 11
Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
Additional Code 5: Not reported
Additional Code 4: Not reported
Additional Code 3: Not reported
Additional Code 2: Not reported
Additional Code 1: Not reported
Quantity Unit: G
Waste Quantity: 55
Quantity Tons: 0.22935
Treatment/Reovery (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135)
Meth Code: H141 - Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--No RCRA Code: Not reported
Waste Code Description: 352 - Other organic solids
TSDF Alt Name: Not reported
TSDF Alt EPA ID: Not reported
Trans Name: RHO CHEM CORPORATION
TSDF EPA ID: CAD008364432
Trans 2 Name: PHILIP WEST INDUSTRIAL SERVICES
Trans 2 EPA ID: CAR000177527
Trans Name: PARC ENVIRONMENTAL
VINCE ZANINOVICH (Continued) S112964192
Program Element: UST REMOVAL/CLOSURE W/1 TANK
APM Number: 31005227
Facility ID: FA0278535
Cross Street: Not reported
Region: FRESNO
City,State,Zip: FRESNO, CA 93727
Address: 7298 E MCKINLEY AVE
Name: KATHRYN ZANINOVICH PROPERTY
CUPA FRESNO:

Site 3 of 3 in cluster A
Actual:
352 ft.

Property FRESNO, CA 93727
Target 7298 E MCKINLEY AVE N/A
A3 KATHRYN ZANINOVICH PROPERTY CUPA Listings S107869574 EPA Region: 09
Contact Title: Not reported
Contact Email: [email protected]
Contact Fax: Not reported
Contact Telephone: 559-940-1398
Contact City,State,Zip: FRESNO, CA 93721
Contact Address: 744 P ST, 3RD FLOOR SUITE 321
Contact Name: ROB SCHLEGEL
EPA ID: CAC003034310
Handler City,State,Zip: FRESNO, CA 93737-9707
Handler Address: 7190 E MCKINLEY AVE
Handler Name: Kb Homes South Bay Inc.

Date Form Received by Agency: 20190917
RCRA Listings:
191 ft. Site 1 of 3 in cluster B

0.036 mi.

Relative:

Lower
Actual:
349 ft.
< 1/8 FRESNO, CA 93737
SW 7190 E MCKINLEY AVE CAC003034310
B4 KB HOMES SOUTH BAY INC. RCRA NonGen / NLR 1025854088 TC7545227.2s Page 12
Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
Sub-Part P Indicator: No
Manifest Broker: No
Recycler Activity Without Storage: No
Exporter of Spent Lead Acid Batteries: No
Importer of Spent Lead Acid Batteries: No
Recognized Trader-Exporter: No
Recognized Trader-Importer: No
Handler Date of Last Change: 20190927
Financial Assurance Required: Not reported
Significant Non-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: No Addressed Significant Non-Complier Universe: No
Unaddressed Significant Non-Complier Universe: No
Significant Non-Complier Universe: No
Groundwater Controls Indicator: N/A
Human Exposure Controls Indicator: N/A
Institutional Control Indicator: No
Environmental Control Indicator: No
Corrective Action Priority Ranking: No NCAPS ranking
Non-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: No
Subject to Corrective Action Universe: No
202 GPRA Corrective Action Baseline: No
2018 GPRA Renewals Baseline: Not on the Baseline
2018 GPRA Permit Baseline: Not on the Baseline
Sub-Part K Indicator: Not reported
Hazardous Secondary Material Indicator: N
Federal Facility Indicator: Not reported
Active Site State-Reg Handler: ---
Federal Universal Waste: No
Universal Waste Destination Facility: No
Universal Waste Indicator: No
Off-Site Waste Receipt: No
Underground Injection Control: No
Smelting Melting and Refining Furnace Exemption: No
Small Quantity On-Site Burner Exemption: No
Recycler Activity with Storage: No
Transfer Facility Activity: No
Transporter Activity: No
Mixed Waste Generator: No
Importer Activity: No
Short-Term Generator Activity: No
Operator Type: Other
Operator Name: Rob Schlegel
Owner Type: Other
Owner Name: Kb Homes South Bay Inc.

Mailing City,State,Zip: FRESNO, CA 93721
Mailing Address: 744 P ST, 3RD FLOOR SUITE 321
State District: Not reported
State District Owner: Not reported
Active Site Indicator: Not reported
Accessibility: Not reported
Biennial Report Cycle: Not reported
Non-Notifier: Not reported
Federal Waste Generator Description: Not a generator, verified Land Type: Not reported
KB HOMES SOUTH BAY INC. (Continued) 1025854088
TC7545227.2s Page 13
Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
Evaluations: No Evaluations Found
Evaluation Action Summary:

Violations: No Violations Found
Facility Has Received Notices of Violations:

NAICS Description: ALL OTHER WASTE MANAGEMENT SERVICES
NAICS Code: 56299
List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions:

Electronic Manifest Broker: Not reported
Non Storage Recycler Activity: Not reported
Current Record: Yes
Spent Lead Acid Battery Exporter: No
Spent Lead Acid Battery Importer: No
Recognized Trader Exporter: No
Recognized Trader Importer: No
Large Quantity Handler of Universal Waste: No
State District Owner: Not reported
Federal Waste Generator Description: Not a generator, verified Handler Name: KB HOMES SOUTH BAY INC.

Receive Date: 20190917
Historic Generators:

Owner/Operator Email: Not reported
Owner/Operator Fax: Not reported
Owner/Operator Telephone Ext: Not reported
Owner/Operator Telephone: 559-940-1398
Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: FRESNO, CA 93721
Owner/Operator Address: 744 P ST, 3RD FLOOR SUITE 321
Date Ended Current: Not reported
Date Became Current: Not reported
Legal Status: Other
Owner/Operator Name: KB HOMES SOUTH BAY INC.

Owner/Operator Indicator: Owner
Owner/Operator Email: Not reported
Owner/Operator Fax: Not reported
Owner/Operator Telephone Ext: Not reported
Owner/Operator Telephone: 559-940-1398
Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: FRESNO, CA 93721
Owner/Operator Address: 744 P ST, 3RD FLOOR SUITE 321
Date Ended Current: Not reported
Date Became Current: Not reported
Legal Status: Other
Owner/Operator Name: ROB SCHLEGEL
Owner/Operator Indicator: Operator
Handler - Owner Operator:

KB HOMES SOUTH BAY INC. (Continued) 1025854088
TC7545227.2s Page 14
Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
Site Name: T.H. AGRICULTURE & NUTRITION CO.

EPA ID: CAD009106220
Site ID: 0901128
Region: 09
SEMS Detail:

Non NPL Status: Not reported
NPL: Deleted from the Final NPL
FF: N
Longitude: -119.660501
Latitude: 36.764728
FIPS Code: 06019
Cong District: 19,22
City,State,Zip: FRESNO, CA 93727
Address 2: Not reported
Address: 7183 E MCKINLEY AVE
Name: T.H. AGRICULTURE & NUTRITION CO.

EPA ID: CAD009106220
Site ID: 0901128
SEMS:

Federal Facility Indicator: No
Sites_with_Status_Information_7557,SITE_EPA_ID=%27CAD009106220%27 1b4c3a8b51d416956c41f1&query=Superfund_National_Priorities_List__NPL__ Site Location URL: https://epa.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=33cebcdfdd Delete URL: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2006-08-21/pdf/E6-13745.pdf Notice URL: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2006-07-11/pdf/E6-10856.pdf Site Progress URL: https://cumulis.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0901128 Site List URL: https://semspub.epa.gov/src/document/09/2400255 Site Score: 42.24
Deletion Date: 8/21/2006
Site EPA ID: CAD009106220
Site Name: T.H. Agriculture & Nutrition Co.

Narr:

Deleted Date: 2006-08-21 00:00:00
Longitude: -119.660501
Native American Entity: Not reported
NAI: N
Latitude: 36.764728
Federal Description: N
City,State,Zip: FRESNO, CA 93727
Address: 7183 E MCKINLEY AVE
Name: T.H. AGRICULTURE & NUTRITION CO.

Site ID: 901128
EPA ID: CAD009106220
EPA Region: 9
Delisted NPL:

CERS
CUPA Listings
PRP
ROD

CPS-SLIC
297 ft. Site 1 of 3 in cluster C US INST CONTROLS

0.056 mi. US ENG CONTROLS
Relative:

Lower
Actual:
349 ft.
< 1/8 FRESNO, CA 93727 RCRA-SQG
SSW 7183 E MCKINLEY AVE SEMS CAD009106220
C5 T.H. AGRICULTURE & NUTRITION CO. 1000146275 Delisted NPL TC7545227.2s Page 15
Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
Region: 09
Current Action Lead: EPA Perf
Qual: Not reported
Finish Date: Not reported
Start Date: 1990-09-27 04:00:00
SEQ: 1
Action Name: ST COOP
Action Code: MA
OU: 00
FF: N
NPL: D
Site Name: T.H. AGRICULTURE & NUTRITION CO.

EPA ID: CAD009106220
Site ID: 0901128
Region: 09
Current Action Lead: EPA Perf
Qual: Not reported
Finish Date: 1986-06-10 04:00:00
Start Date: 1986-06-10 04:00:00
SEQ: 1
Action Name: NPL FINL
Action Code: NF
OU: 00
FF: N
NPL: D
Site Name: T.H. AGRICULTURE & NUTRITION CO.

EPA ID: CAD009106220
Site ID: 0901128
Region: 09
Current Action Lead: EPA Perf
Qual: H
Finish Date: 1984-04-01 06:00:00
Start Date: 1984-04-01 06:00:00
SEQ: 1
Action Name: SI
Action Code: SI
OU: 00
FF: N
NPL: D
Site Name: T.H. AGRICULTURE & NUTRITION CO.

EPA ID: CAD009106220
Site ID: 0901128
Region: 09
Current Action Lead: EPA Perf
Qual: Not reported
Finish Date: 1990-08-01 04:00:00
Start Date: 1990-08-01 04:00:00
SEQ: 1
Action Name: RV ASSESS
Action Code: RS
OU: 00
FF: N
NPL: D
T.H. AGRICULTURE & NUTRITION CO. (Continued) 1000146275 TC7545227.2s Page 16
Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
Qual: Not reported
Finish Date: 1991-12-20 05:00:00
Start Date: 1991-12-20 05:00:00
SEQ: 2
Action Name: RV ASSESS
Action Code: RS
OU: 00
FF: N
NPL: D
Site Name: T.H. AGRICULTURE & NUTRITION CO.

EPA ID: CAD009106220
Site ID: 0901128
Region: 09
Current Action Lead: EPA Perf
Qual: Not reported
Finish Date: Not reported
Start Date: 2000-08-10 04:00:00
SEQ: 1
Action Name: ADMIN REC
Action Code: AR
OU: 00
FF: N
NPL: D
Site Name: T.H. AGRICULTURE & NUTRITION CO.

EPA ID: CAD009106220
Site ID: 0901128
Region: 09
Current Action Lead: EPA Perf
Qual: Not reported
Finish Date: 2006-08-21 04:00:00
Start Date: 2006-07-11 04:00:00
SEQ: 1
Action Name: DELETION
Action Code: ND
OU: 00
FF: N
NPL: D
Site Name: T.H. AGRICULTURE & NUTRITION CO.

EPA ID: CAD009106220
Site ID: 0901128
Region: 09
Current Action Lead: EPA Perf
Qual: Not reported
Finish Date: 2005-09-29 04:00:00
Start Date: 2005-09-29 04:00:00
SEQ: 1
Action Name: CLSOUT R
Action Code: CQ
OU: 00
FF: N
NPL: D
Site Name: T.H. AGRICULTURE & NUTRITION CO.

EPA ID: CAD009106220
Site ID: 0901128
T.H. AGRICULTURE & NUTRITION CO. (Continued) 1000146275 TC7545227.2s Page 17
Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
SEQ: 1
Action Name: HAZRANK
Action Code: HR
OU: 00
FF: N
NPL: D
Site Name: T.H. AGRICULTURE & NUTRITION CO.

EPA ID: CAD009106220
Site ID: 0901128
Region: 09
Current Action Lead: EPA Perf
Qual: Not reported
Finish Date: 1984-10-15 05:00:00
Start Date: 1984-10-15 05:00:00
SEQ: 1
Action Name: PROPOSED
Action Code: NP
OU: 00
FF: N
NPL: D
Site Name: T.H. AGRICULTURE & NUTRITION CO.

EPA ID: CAD009106220
Site ID: 0901128
Region: 09
Current Action Lead: EPA Perf
Qual: Not reported
Finish Date: 2004-06-24 04:00:00
Start Date: 2004-06-24 04:00:00
SEQ: 1
Action Name: PCOR
Action Code: CM
OU: 00
FF: N
NPL: D
Site Name: T.H. AGRICULTURE & NUTRITION CO.

EPA ID: CAD009106220
Site ID: 0901128
Region: 09
Current Action Lead: EPA Perf
Qual: H
Finish Date: 1984-04-01 06:00:00
Start Date: 1984-04-01 06:00:00
SEQ: 1
Action Name: PA
Action Code: PA
OU: 00
FF: N
NPL: D
Site Name: T.H. AGRICULTURE & NUTRITION CO.

EPA ID: CAD009106220
Site ID: 0901128
Region: 09
Current Action Lead: EPA Perf
T.H. AGRICULTURE & NUTRITION CO. (Continued) 1000146275 TC7545227.2s Page 18
Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
OU: 00
FF: N
NPL: D
Site Name: T.H. AGRICULTURE & NUTRITION CO.

EPA ID: CAD009106220
Site ID: 0901128
Region: 09
Current Action Lead: EPA Perf
Qual: Not reported
Finish Date: 2013-09-26 05:00:00
Start Date: 2013-09-26 05:00:00
SEQ: 2
Action Name: 5 YEAR
Action Code: FE
OU: 00
FF: N
NPL: D
Site Name: T.H. AGRICULTURE & NUTRITION CO.

EPA ID: CAD009106220
Site ID: 0901128
Region: 09
Current Action Lead: EPA Perf
Qual: Not reported
Finish Date: 2006-07-11 04:00:00
Start Date: 2006-07-11 04:00:00
SEQ: 1
Action Name: NOID
Action Code: TU
OU: 00
FF: N
NPL: D
Site Name: T.H. AGRICULTURE & NUTRITION CO.

EPA ID: CAD009106220
Site ID: 0901128
Region: 09
Current Action Lead: EPA Perf
Qual: Not reported
Finish Date: 2008-09-30 04:00:00
Start Date: 2007-04-03 04:00:00
SEQ: 1
Action Name: 5 YEAR
Action Code: FE
OU: 00
FF: N
NPL: D
Site Name: T.H. AGRICULTURE & NUTRITION CO.

EPA ID: CAD009106220
Site ID: 0901128
Region: 09
Current Action Lead: EPA Perf
Qual: Not reported
Finish Date: 1984-04-01 06:00:00
Start Date: 1984-04-01 06:00:00
T.H. AGRICULTURE & NUTRITION CO. (Continued) 1000146275 TC7545227.2s Page 19
Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
Site Name: T.H. AGRICULTURE & NUTRITION CO.

EPA ID: CAD009106220
Site ID: 0901128
Region: 09
Current Action Lead: St Ovrsght
Qual: FR
Finish Date: 2004-09-29 04:00:00
Start Date: 2002-06-28 04:00:00
SEQ: 1
Action Name: PRP RA
Action Code: BF
OU: 01
FF: N
NPL: D
Site Name: T.H. AGRICULTURE & NUTRITION CO.

EPA ID: CAD009106220
Site ID: 0901128
Region: 09
Current Action Lead: St Ovrsght
Qual: R
Finish Date: 1999-06-20 04:00:00
Start Date: 1999-06-20 04:00:00
SEQ: 1
Action Name: ROD
Action Code: RO
OU: 01
FF: N
NPL: D
Site Name: T.H. AGRICULTURE & NUTRITION CO.

EPA ID: CAD009106220
Site ID: 0901128
Region: 09
Current Action Lead: EPA Perf
Qual: Not reported
Finish Date: Not reported
Start Date: 2023-03-03 06:00:00
SEQ: 1
Action Name: CI
Action Code: CR
OU: 00
FF: N
NPL: D
Site Name: T.H. AGRICULTURE & NUTRITION CO.

EPA ID: CAD009106220
Site ID: 0901128
Region: 09
Current Action Lead: EPA Perf
Qual: Not reported
Finish Date: 2018-09-26 05:00:00
Start Date: 2017-11-29 05:00:00
SEQ: 3
Action Name: 5 YEAR
Action Code: FE
T.H. AGRICULTURE & NUTRITION CO. (Continued) 1000146275 TC7545227.2s Page 20
Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
Importer Activity: No
Short-Term Generator Activity: No
Operator Type: Private
Operator Name: Not Required
Owner Type: Not reported
Owner Name: Not reported
Mailing City,State,Zip: FRESNO, CA 93747
Mailing Address: PO BOX 7797
State District: 5
State District Owner: Ca
Active Site Indicator: Handler Activities
Accessibility: Not reported
Biennial Report Cycle: Not reported
Non-Notifier: Not reported
Federal Waste Generator Description: Small Quantity Generator Land Type: Not reported
EPA Region: 09
Contact Title: Not reported
Contact Email: Not reported
Contact Fax: Not reported
Contact Telephone: Not reported
Contact City,State,Zip: Not reported
Contact Address: Not reported
Contact Name: Not reported
EPA ID: CAD009106220
Handler City,State,Zip: FRESNO, CA 93727
Handler Address: 7183 E MC KINLEY AVE
Handler Name: Th Agriculture & Nutrition Co Inc
Date Form Received by Agency: 19960901
RCRA Listings:

Current Action Lead: St Perf
Qual: Not reported
Finish Date: 1980-07-01 04:00:00
Start Date: 1980-07-01 04:00:00
SEQ: 1
Action Name: DISCVRY
Action Code: DS
OU: 00
FF: N
NPL: D
Site Name: T.H. AGRICULTURE & NUTRITION CO.

EPA ID: CAD009106220
Site ID: 0901128
Region: 09
Current Action Lead: St Ovrsght
Qual: Not reported
Finish Date: 1987-02-06 05:00:00
Start Date: 1985-09-03 05:00:00
SEQ: 1
Action Name: PRP CR
Action Code: EL
OU: 00
FF: N
NPL: D
T.H. AGRICULTURE & NUTRITION CO. (Continued) 1000146275 TC7545227.2s Page 21
Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
Date Became Current: Not reported
Legal Status: Private
Owner/Operator Name: NOT REQUIRED
Owner/Operator Indicator: Operator
Owner/Operator Email: Not reported
Owner/Operator Fax: Not reported
Owner/Operator Telephone Ext: Not reported
Owner/Operator Telephone: 415-555-1212
Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999
Owner/Operator Address: NOT REQUIRED
Date Ended Current: Not reported
Date Became Current: Not reported
Legal Status: Private
Owner/Operator Name: NOT REQUIRED
Owner/Operator Indicator: Owner
Handler - Owner Operator:

Sub-Part P Indicator: No
Manifest Broker: Not reported
Recycler Activity Without Storage: Not reported
Exporter of Spent Lead Acid Batteries: No
Importer of Spent Lead Acid Batteries: No
Recognized Trader-Exporter: No
Recognized Trader-Importer: No
Handler Date of Last Change: 20020627
Financial Assurance Required: Not reported
Significant Non-Complier With a Compliance Schedule Universe: No Addressed Significant Non-Complier Universe: No
Unaddressed Significant Non-Complier Universe: No
Significant Non-Complier Universe: No
Groundwater Controls Indicator: N/A
Human Exposure Controls Indicator: N/A
Institutional Control Indicator: No
Environmental Control Indicator: No
Corrective Action Priority Ranking: No NCAPS ranking
Non-TSDFs Where RCRA CA has Been Imposed Universe: No
Subject to Corrective Action Universe: No
202 GPRA Corrective Action Baseline: No
2018 GPRA Renewals Baseline: Not on the Baseline
2018 GPRA Permit Baseline: Not on the Baseline
Sub-Part K Indicator: Not reported
Hazardous Secondary Material Indicator: NN
Federal Facility Indicator: Not reported
Active Site State-Reg Handler: ---
Federal Universal Waste: No
Universal Waste Destination Facility: No
Universal Waste Indicator: No
Off-Site Waste Receipt: No
Underground Injection Control: No
Smelting Melting and Refining Furnace Exemption: No
Small Quantity On-Site Burner Exemption: No
Recycler Activity with Storage: No
Transfer Facility Activity: No
Transporter Activity: No
Mixed Waste Generator: No
T.H. AGRICULTURE & NUTRITION CO. (Continued) 1000146275 TC7545227.2s Page 22
Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
Action Name: Record of Decision
EPA ID: CAD009106220
Action Taken Date: 06/20/1999
Event Code: Not reported
City,State,Zip: FRESNO, CA 93727
Address 2: Not reported
Address: 7183 E MCKINLEY AVE
Name: T.H. AGRICULTURE & NUTRITION CO.

SIte:

Evaluations: No Evaluations Found
Evaluation Action Summary:

Violations: No Violations Found
Facility Has Received Notices of Violations:

NAICS Description: PESTICIDE AND OTHER AGRICULTURAL CHEMICAL MANUFACTURING NAICS Code: 32532
List of NAICS Codes and Descriptions:

Electronic Manifest Broker: Not reported
Non Storage Recycler Activity: Not reported
Current Record: No
Spent Lead Acid Battery Exporter: No
Spent Lead Acid Battery Importer: No
Recognized Trader Exporter: No
Recognized Trader Importer: No
Large Quantity Handler of Universal Waste: No
State District Owner: Ca
Federal Waste Generator Description: Large Quantity Generator Handler Name: TH AGRICULTURE & NUTRITION CO INC
Receive Date: 19800729
Electronic Manifest Broker: Not reported
Non Storage Recycler Activity: Not reported
Current Record: Yes
Spent Lead Acid Battery Exporter: No
Spent Lead Acid Battery Importer: No
Recognized Trader Exporter: No
Recognized Trader Importer: No
Large Quantity Handler of Universal Waste: No
State District Owner: Ca
Federal Waste Generator Description: Small Quantity Generator Handler Name: TH AGRICULTURE & NUTRITION CO INC
Receive Date: 19960901
Historic Generators:

Owner/Operator Email: Not reported
Owner/Operator Fax: Not reported
Owner/Operator Telephone Ext: Not reported
Owner/Operator Telephone: 415-555-1212
Owner/Operator City,State,Zip: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999
Owner/Operator Address: NOT REQUIRED
Date Ended Current: Not reported
T.H. AGRICULTURE & NUTRITION CO. (Continued) 1000146275 TC7545227.2s Page 23
Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
Event: Not reported
Contact Telephone: Not reported
Contact Name: Not reported
Event Code: Not reported
Action Taken Date: 06/20/1999
Action Name: Record of Decision
Operable Unit: 01
Action ID: 1
Contaminated Media: Groundwater
EPA ID: CAD009106220
Longitude: -119.660501
Latitude: 36.764728
Superfund Alternative Agreement: N
NPL Status: Deleted from the Final NPL
Fiscal Year: 1999
Federal Facility: N
Event: Not reported
Contact Telephone: Not reported
Contact Name: Not reported
Event Code: Not reported
Action Taken Date: 06/20/1999
Action Name: Record of Decision
Operable Unit: 01
Action ID: 1
Contaminated Media: Soil
EPA ID: CAD009106220
Longitude: -119.660501
Latitude: 36.764728
Superfund Alternative Agreement: N
NPL Status: Deleted from the Final NPL
Fiscal Year: 1999
Federal Facility: N
Event: Not reported
Contact Telephone: Not reported
Contact Name: Not reported
Event Code: Not reported
Action Taken Date: 06/20/1999
Action Name: Record of Decision
Operable Unit: 01
Action ID: 1
Contaminated Media: Soil
EPA ID: CAD009106220
Media:

Longitude: -119.660501
Latitude: 36.764728
Superfund Alternative Agreement: N
NPL Status: Deleted from the Final NPL
Fiscal Year: 1999
Federal Facility: N
Event: Not reported
Contact Telephone: Not reported
Contact Name: Not reported
Contaminated Media: Soil
Operable Unit: 01
Action ID: 1
T.H. AGRICULTURE & NUTRITION CO. (Continued) 1000146275 TC7545227.2s Page 24
Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
Longitude: -119.660501
Latitude: 36.764728
Superfund Alternative Agreement: N
NPL Status: Deleted from the Final NPL
Fiscal Year: 1999
Federal Facility: N
Event: Not reported
Contact Telephone: Not reported
Contact Name: Not reported
Event Code: Not reported
Action Taken Date: 06/20/1999
Action Name: Record of Decision
Operable Unit: 01
Action ID: 1
Contaminated Media: Soil
EPA ID: CAD009106220
Longitude: -119.660501
Latitude: 36.764728
Superfund Alternative Agreement: N
NPL Status: Deleted from the Final NPL
Fiscal Year: 1999
Federal Facility: N
Event: Not reported
Contact Telephone: Not reported
Contact Name: Not reported
Event Code: Not reported
Action Taken Date: 06/20/1999
Action Name: Record of Decision
Operable Unit: 01
Action ID: 1
Contaminated Media: Groundwater
EPA ID: CAD009106220
Longitude: -119.660501
Latitude: 36.764728
Superfund Alternative Agreement: N
NPL Status: Deleted from the Final NPL
Fiscal Year: 1999
Federal Facility: N
Event: Not reported
Contact Telephone: Not reported
Contact Name: Not reported
Event Code: Not reported
Action Taken Date: 06/20/1999
Action Name: Record of Decision
Operable Unit: 01
Action ID: 1
Contaminated Media: Groundwater
EPA ID: CAD009106220
Longitude: -119.660501
Latitude: 36.764728
Superfund Alternative Agreement: N
NPL Status: Deleted from the Final NPL
Fiscal Year: 1999
Federal Facility: N
T.H. AGRICULTURE & NUTRITION CO. (Continued) 1000146275 TC7545227.2s Page 25
Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
City,State,Zip: FRESNO, CA 93727
Address 2: Not reported
Address: 7183 E MCKINLEY AVE
Name: T.H. AGRICULTURE & NUTRITION CO.

US INST CONTROLS:

Longitude: -119.660501
Latitude: 36.764728
Superfund Alternative Agreement: N
NPL Status: Deleted from the Final NPL
Fiscal Year: 1999
Federal Facility: N
Event: Not reported
Contact Telephone: Not reported
Contact Name: Not reported
Event Code: Not reported
Action Taken Date: 06/20/1999
Action Name: Record of Decision
Operable Unit: 01
Action ID: 1
Contaminated Media: Groundwater
EPA ID: CAD009106220
Longitude: -119.660501
Latitude: 36.764728
Superfund Alternative Agreement: N
NPL Status: Deleted from the Final NPL
Fiscal Year: 1999
Federal Facility: N
Event: Not reported
Contact Telephone: Not reported
Contact Name: Not reported
Event Code: Not reported
Action Taken Date: 06/20/1999
Action Name: Record of Decision
Operable Unit: 01
Action ID: 1
Contaminated Media: Groundwater
EPA ID: CAD009106220
Longitude: -119.660501
Latitude: 36.764728
Superfund Alternative Agreement: N
NPL Status: Deleted from the Final NPL
Fiscal Year: 1999
Federal Facility: N
Event: Not reported
Contact Telephone: Not reported
Contact Name: Not reported
Event Code: Not reported
Action Taken Date: 06/20/1999
Action Name: Record of Decision
Operable Unit: 01
Action ID: 1
Contaminated Media: Groundwater
EPA ID: CAD009106220
T.H. AGRICULTURE & NUTRITION CO. (Continued) 1000146275 TC7545227.2s Page 26
Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
RWQCB Region: CENTRAL VALLEY RWQCB (REGION 5F)
Facility Project Subtype: Not reported
Military DOD Site: No
CA Enviroscreen 4 Score: 40-45%
CA Enviroscreen 3 Score: 31-35%
Disadvantaged Community: Not reported
Dwr Groundwater Subbasin Name: San Joaquin Valley - Kings (5-022.08) CA Water Watershed Name: South Valley Floor - Fresno (551.30) No Further Action Date: 05/12/2010
Stop Description: Not reported
Stop Method: Not reported
Discharge Cause: Not reported
Discharge Source: Not reported
How Discovered Description: Not reported
How Discovered: Not reported
Leak Reported Date: 01/02/1965
Begin Date: 01/01/1986
Quantity Released Gallons: Not reported
Cuf Case: NO
Coordinate Source: * USGS Quad map
EPA Region: 9
Potential Contaminants of Concern: Not reported
Potential Media Affected: Not reported
File Location: DTSC
RB Case Number: SLT5FQ038
Local Agency: DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL
Case Worker: DD
Case Type: Cleanup Program Site
Longitude: -119.663
Latitude: 36.7648
Lead Agency Case Number: 10280334
Lead Agency: DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL
Global Id: SLT5FQ384331
Status Date: 05/12/2010
Facility Status: Completed - Case Closed
Region: STATE
City,State,Zip: FRESNO, CA 93727-9707
Address: 7183 E MCKINLEY AVE
Name: THAN
CPS-SLIC: