Exhibit D-1 - 2023 Draft Environmental Impact Report with Appendices — Fresno City Council, May 21, 2026 (part 6 of 6)

Table B-1b. Trip Lengths and Vehicle Miles Traveled by Operational Mobile Sources (4500 W. Shaw Avenue)
Costco Commercial Center
Fresno, California
Peak Daily Trips
(one-way
trips/day)1
Peak Daily
VMT2
Annual Average
Trips (one-way
trips/yr)
Annual Average
VMT
Primary 1,363 58,264 497,495 21,266,360
Pass-by 48 0 17,520 0
Diverted 2,099 3,442 766,135 1,256,330
Notes:

Abbreviations:

CalEEMod® - CALifornia Emissions Estimator MODel
MDO - market delivery operation
VMT - vehicle miles traveled
2 Peak daily VMT based on Project-specific data provided by Kittelson & Associates or estimated as a product of average trip length and number of trips presented in this table.

Trip Type
1 Peak daily trips are based on Project-specific data provided by Kittelson & Associates.

Passenger Vehicles

Page 1 of 1 ends

Table B-2. Operational Mobile Source Fleet Mixes
Costco Commercial Center
Fresno, California
Fleet Mix
CalEEMod®
Default1
Gas 12,057,533 52.8% 55.0%
Phe 351,337 1.54% 1.6%
Elec 514,390 2.25% 0%
Dsl 22,675 0.10% 0%
Gas 1,013,826 5.88% 5.9%
Phe 1,027 0.01% 0.0%
Elec 1,049 0.01% 0%
Dsl 250 0.00% 0%
Gas 5,488,159 19.29% 19.4%
Phe 39,774 0.14% 0.1%
Elec 17,710 0.06% 0%
Dsl 14,595 0.05% 0%
Gas 4,629,686 17.47% 17.8%
Phe 29,118 0.11% 0.1%
Elec 19,405 0.07% 0%
Dsl 71,606 0.27% 0%
LHD1 All 2.7% -- -- --
LHD2 All 0.7% -- -- --
MHD All 1.4% -- -- --
HHDT All 2.2% -- -- --
OBUS All 0.1% -- -- --
UBUS All 0.0% -- -- --
MCY All 2.4% -- -- --
SBUS All 0.2% -- -- --
MH All 0.3% -- -- --
Abbreviations:

CalEEMod® - CALifornia Emissions Estimator MODel MDV - medium-duty vehicle EMFAC - EMission FACtors model MH - motor homes
HHDT - Heavy heavy-duty truck MHD - medium heavy-duty trucks LDA - light duty automobiles OBUS - other buses
LDT - light-duty trucks SBUS - school buses
LHD - light heavy-duty trucks UBUS - urban buses
MCY - motorcycles VMT - vehicle miles traveled

17.6%

16.1%
Notes:

Fuel Type

EMFAC VMT
Output2
(miles/day)
Employee Vehicle
Fleet Mix3
Member Vehicle
Fleet Mix4
1 CalEEMod® default for Fresno County calendar year 2023. 2 Data obtained from EMFAC2021 for default emissions activity. 3 Fleet mix for employee vehicles estimated based on the ratio of the vehicle classes in CalEEMod® default fleet mix and the EMFAC2021 VMT output.
4 Fleet mix for member vehicles visiting the Costco Gas Station are estimated based on the ratio of the vehicle classes in CalEEMod® default fleet mix and the EMFAC2021 VMT output. Vehicles are assumed to be gasoline or plug-in hybrid.

Vehicle
Category
LDA
LDT1
LDT2
MDV

51.0%

5.3%

Page 1 of 1 ends

Table B-3. Operational Mobile Source GHG Emission Factors - Running Exhaust Costco Commercial Center
Fresno, California
CO2 N2O CH4
LDA Gas 12,057,533 3,843 0.06 0.03
LDA Phe 351,337 53 0.00 0.00
LDA Elec 514,390 0 0.00 0.00
LDA Dsl 22,675 6 0.00 0.00
LDT1 Gas 1,013,826 388 0.01 0.01
LDT1 Phe 1,027 0 0.00 0.00
LDT1 Elec 1,049 0 0.00 0.00
LDT1 Dsl 250 0 0.00 0.00
LDT2 Gas 5,488,159 2,188 0.04 0.02
LDT2 Phe 39,774 6 0.00 0.00
LDT2 Elec 17,710 0 0.00 0.00
LDT2 Dsl 14,595 5 0.00 0.00
MDV Gas 4,629,686 2,265 0.05 0.02
MDV Phe 29,118 4 0.00 0.00
MDV Elec 19,405 0 0.00 0.00
MDV Dsl 71,606 32 0.01 0.00
HHDT Dsl 2,030,441 3,590 0.57 0.00
CO2 N2O CH4
LDA 289 0.005 0.002
LDA 136 0.001 0.000
LDA 0 0.000 0.000
LDA 231 0.036 0.001
LDT1 347 0.013 0.009
LDT1 124 0.001 0.000
LDT1 0 0.000 0.000
LDT1 401 0.063 0.012
LDT2 362 0.007 0.003
LDT2 129 0.001 0.000
LDT2 0 0.000 0.000
LDT2 307 0.048 0.001
MDV 444 0.009 0.005
MDV 136 0.001 0.000
MDV 0 0.000 0.000
MDV 412 0.065 0.001
EMFAC
Vehicle
Class Fuel

EMFAC VMT
Output1
(miles/day)
EMFAC Emissions Output1
Passenger Vehicles
Delivery Trucks2
EMFAC
Vehicle
Class
Running Exhaust Emission Factors3
(grams/mile)
Passenger Vehicles
Dsl
Fuel
Gas
Phe
Gas
Phe
Gas
Phe
Gas
Phe
Elec
Dsl
Elec
Dsl
Elec
Dsl
Elec

Page 1 of 2 ends

Table B-3. Operational Mobile Source GHG Emission Factors - Running Exhaust Costco Commercial Center
Fresno, California
CO2 N2O CH4
EMFAC
Vehicle
Class
Running Exhaust Emission Factors3
(grams/mile)
Fuel
331 0.006 0.003
324 0.006 0.003
HHDT 1604.00 0.25 0.00
Notes:

Abbreviations:

Delivery Trucks2
1 Data obtained from EMFAC2021 for default emissions activity. 2 Delivery trucks are assumed to be diesel-fueled.

Dsl
Member Vehicle Emission Factor4
Employee Vehicle Emission Factor4

Page 2 of 2 ends

Table B-4. Operational Mobile Source GHG Emission Factors - Starting Exhaust Costco Commercial Center
Fresno, California
CO2 N2O CH4
LDA Gas 1,459,129 115.4 0.1 0.119
LDA Phe 31,224 2.29 0.0 0.001
LDA Elec 56,838 0 0 0
LDA Dsl 3,207 0 0 0
LDT1 Gas 135,565 13.9 0.0 0.021
LDT1 Phe 83 0.0066 0.000 0.0
LDT1 Elec 118 0 0 0
LDT1 Dsl 62 0 0 0
LDT2 Gas 657,946 66.5 0.0 0.067
LDT2 Phe 3,337 0.290 0.0 0.000
LDT2 Elec 2,516 0 0 0
LDT2 Dsl 1,661 0 0 0
MDV Gas 598,810 75.1 0.0 0.081
MDV Phe 2,568 0.3 0.0 0.000
MDV Elec 2,761 0 0 0
MDV Dsl 8,640 0 0 0
HHDT Dsl 237,288 0.0 0.0 0.0
CO2 N2O CH4
LDA 71.73 0.03 0.0742
LDA 66.44 0.02 0.0416
LDA 0 0 0
LDA 0 0 0
LDT1 93.34 0.04 0.1408
LDT1 72.34 0.02 0.0416
LDT1 0 0 0
LDT1 0 0 0
LDT2 91.64 0.04 0.0925
LDT2 78.85 0.02 0.0416
LDT2 0 0 0
LDT2 0 0 0
MDV 113.71 0.05 0.1229
MDV 99.36 0.02 0.0416
MDV 0 0 0
MDV 0 0 0
84 0.038 0.090
82 0.037 0.087
Member Vehicle Weighted Emission
Factor4
Employee Vehicle Weighted Emission
Factor4
Phe
Elec
Dsl
Dsl
EMFAC Emissions Output1
(tons/day)
Passenger Vehicles
Delivery Trucks2
Starting Exhaust Emission Factors3
(grams/trip)
Passenger Vehicles
EMFAC
Vehicle
Class Fuel
EMFAC Vehicle
Trips Output1
(trips/day)
Vehicle
Class Fuel
Gas
Phe
Elec
Elec
Dsl
Gas
Gas
Dsl
Gas
Phe
Phe
Elec

Page 1 of 1 ends

Table B-4. Operational Mobile Source GHG Emission Factors - Starting Exhaust Costco Commercial Center
Fresno, California
CO2 N2O CH4
Starting Exhaust Emission Factors3
Vehicle (grams/trip)
Class Fuel
HHDT 0.0 0.0 0.0
Notes:

Abbreviations:

CH4 - methane LDT - Light-Duty Truck
CO2 - carbon dioxide HHDT - Heavy-Heavy Duty truck
Dsl - Diesel MDV - medium-duty vehicle
Elec - Electric N2O - nitrous oxide
EMFAC - EMission FACtors model Phe - Plug-in hybrid
LDA - Light Duty Automobile VMT - vehicle miles traveled Conversion Factor:
907184.74 grams per ton
Delivery Trucks2
Dsl
1 Data obtained from EMFAC2021 for default emissions activity. 2 Delivery trucks are assumed to be diesel-fueled.
3 Emission factors for EMFAC vehicle classes are estimated as a ratio of the EMFAC emissions output and EMFAC VMT output.
4 Emission factors for EMFAC vehicle classes are weighted based on the project-specific fleet mix in Table B-2 to estimate trip-based emission factors for passenger vehicles.

Page 1 of 1 ends

Table B-5. Operational Mobile Source GHG Emission Factors - Idling Exhaust Costco Commercial Center
Fresno, California
CO2 N2O CH4
LDA Gas 27.7 0 0.0007
LDA Phe 17.1 0 0.0002
LDA Elec 0.0 0 0.0000
LDA Dsl 25.1 0 0.0006
LDT1 Gas 33.2 0 0.0023
LDT1 Phe 15.5 0 0.0002
LDT1 Elec 0.0 0 0.0000
LDT1 Dsl 43.0 0 0.0023
LDT2 Gas 34.9 0 0.0009
LDT2 Phe 16.1 0 0.0002
LDT2 Elec 0.0 0 0.0000
LDT2 Dsl 32.9 0 0.0005
MDV Gas 43.1 0 0.0013
MDV Phe 16.9 0 0.0002
MDV Elec 0.0 0 0.0000
MDV Dsl 41.6 0 0.0004

32.0 0 0.0009

31.3 0 0.0009
HHDT Dsl 224.0 0 0.0021
Notes:

Abbreviations:

CH4 - methane LDT - Light-Duty Truck
CO2 - carbon dioxide HHDT - Heavy-Heavy Duty truck
Dsl - Diesel MDV - medium-duty vehicle
Elec - Electric N2O - nitrous oxide
EMFAC - EMission FACtors model Phe - Plug-in hybrid
LDA - Light Duty Automobile VMT - vehicle miles traveled mph - miles per hour
Conversion Factor:
60 minutes per hour
EMFAC Vehicle
Class
Idling Emission Factors1
(grams/idle-minute)
Passenger Vehicles
Fuel
Delivery Trucks3
1 Data obtained from EMFAC2021 project-level output. Passenger vehicle emission rates are equivalent to the running exhaust emission rate in grams per mile at 5 mph, multiplied by the speed correction factor of 2.5 mph. 3 Delivery trucks are assumed to be diesel-fueled.
2 Emission factors for EMFAC vehicle classes are weighted based on the project-specific fleet mix in Table B-2 to estimate trip-based emission factors for passenger vehicles.

Employee Vehicle Weighted
Emission Factor2
Member Vehicle Weighted
Emission Factor2

Page 1 of 1 ends

Table B-6a. Greenhouse Gas Emission Estimates for Operational Mobile Sources (Herndon/Riverside) Costco Commercial Center
Fresno, California
CO2 N2O CH4 CO2e
5 Primary 17.3 3,666,790 63,337,720 -- 21,293 0.54 0.54 21,468.0 Diverted 1.0 1,473,870 1,503,435 -- 622.32 0.07 0.14 645.2 Pass-By 0.10 1,382,620 138,262 -- 162.36 0.05 0.12 181.3 Warehouse, Fuel Station, and Car Wash
Employee Vehicles Primary 30.7 109,500 3,361,650 -- 1,099 0.03 0.02 1,106.9 MDO Driver and Warehouse Employee
Vehicles Primary 30.70 49,640 1,523,875 -- 498 0.01 0.01 501.8 MDO Delivery Trucks Primary 81.5 7,300 594,950 18,250 958 0.15 0.00 1,003.2 Fuel Delivery Trucks Primary 125.0 5,110 638,750 12,775 1,027 0.16 0.00 1,075.5 Warehouse Delivery Trucks Primary 125.0 9,490 1,186,250 23,725 1,908 0.30 0.00 1,997.4 Member Vehicle Idling at Gasoline Dispensing
Facility Primary -- -- -- 33,638,400 1,076 0.00 0.03 1,076.5 28,643 1.31 0.86 29,056
Abbreviations:

CH4 - methane N2O - nitrous oxide
CO2 - carbon dioxide VMT - vehicle miles traveled
MT - metric tonnes yr - year
Mobile Source Activity
Member Vehicles
Trip Type
Idle
Duration2,3
(minutes/
year)
GHG Emissions4
(MT/yr)
Trip
Distance1
(miles)
Annual
Average
Trips1
(one-way
trips/year)
Annual
Average VMT1
(miles/year)
3 Delivery truck idle duration is 5 minutes based on the CARB Air Toxic Control Measure to Limit Diesel-Fueled Commercial Motor Vehicle Idling. Available at: https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/ourwork/programs/atcm-to-limit-vehicle-idling/about. Accessed: September 2021. For GDF idling this is actually idling duration in units of minutes per year. 4 GHG emissions include running exhaust, starting exhaust, and idling exhaust. Emissions were estimated using emission factors from Tables B-3, B-4, and B-5 along with annual VMT, annual trips, and idle duration.
5 CO2e was estimated using the global warming potentials of CO2, CH4, and N2O, which are 1, 25, and 298 respectively.

Total Emissions
Notes
1 Data obtained from Table B-1a.
2 Idle duration for passenger vehicles visiting the gas station is estimated using a maximum queue length of 3 vehicles per queue lane and a transaction time of 4 minutes per vehicle. The queue is assumed to stay constant while the gas station is open (6 AM to 10 PM), 7 days/week. Queue length is based on Saturday midday peak hour average queue length projections from existing Costco facilities provided by Kittelson & Associates.

Page 1 of 1 ends

Table B-6b. Greenhouse Gas Emission Estimates for Operational Mobile Sources (4500 W. Shaw Avenue) Costco Commercial Center
Fresno, California
CO2 N2O CH4 CO2e
3 Primary 497,495 21,266,360 7,087 0.15 0.11 7,136
Pass-by 17,520 0 1.48 0.00 0.00 1.7
Diverted 766,135 1,256,330 481 0.04 0.07 494
7,570 0.19 0.19 7,632
Abbreviations:

CH4 - methane N2O - nitrous oxide
CO2 - carbon dioxide VMT - vehicle miles traveled
MT - metric tonnes yr - year
Notes
1 Data obtained from Table B-1b.
2 GHG emissions include running exhaust and starting exhaust. Emissions were estimated using emission factors from Tables B-3 and B-4 along with annual VMT and annual trips.
3 CO2e was estimated using the global warming potentials of CO2, CH4, and N2O, which are 1, 25, and 298, respectively.

GHG Emissions2
(MT/yr)
Passenger Vehicles
Annual
Average VMT1
(miles/year)
Total Emissions
Mobile Source Activity Trip Type
Annual
Average
Trips1
(one-way
trips/year)

Page 1 of 1 ends

Costco Commercial Center
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Technical Report
Fresno, California
Confidential

APPENDIX C

GHG CONSISTENCY
Table C-1. Consistency with 2022 CARB Scoping Plan Update Costco Commercial Center
Fresno, California
Priority Areas Priority GHG Reduction Strategies Consistency Convert local government fleets to ZEVs and provide EV charging at public sites Create a jurisdiction-specific ZEV ecosystem to support deployment of ZEVs statewide (such as building standards that exceed state building codes, permit streamlining, infrastructure siting, consumer education, preferential parking policies, and ZEV readiness plans) Reduce or eliminate minimum parking standards
Implement Complete Streets policies and investments, consistent with general plan circulation element requirements
Increase access to public transit by increasing density of development near transit, improving transit service by increasing service frequency, creating bus priority lanes, reducing or eliminating fares, microtransit, etc.

Increase public access to clean mobility options by planning for and investing in electric shuttles, bike share, car share, and walking
Implement parking pricing or transportation demand management pricing strategies Amend zoning or development codes to enable mixed-use, walkable, transit-oriented, and compact infill development (such as increasing the allowable density of a neighborhood) Preserve natural and working lands by implementing land use policies that guide development toward infill areas and do not convert “greenfield” land to urban uses (e.g., green belts, strategic conservation easements)
Adopt all-electric new construction reach codes for residential and commercial uses Adopt policies and incentive programs to implement energy efficiency retrofits for existing buildings, such as weatherization, lighting upgrades, and replacing energy-intensive appliances and equipment with more efficient systems (such as Energy Star-rated equipment and equipment controllers)
Adopt policies and incentive programs to electrify all appliances and equipment in existing buildings such as appliance rebates, existing building reach codes, or time of sale electrification ordinances Facilitate deployment of renewable energy production and distribution and energy storage on privately owned land uses (e.g., permit streamlining, information sharing) Deploy renewable energy production and energy storage directly in new public projects and on existing public facilities (e.g., solar photovoltaic systems on rooftops of municipal buildings and on canopies in public parking lots, battery storage systems in municipal buildings) Abbreviations:

CalGreen - California Green Building Standards Code
CARB - California Air Resources Board
EV - electric vehicle
GHG - greenhouse gas
PG&E - Pacific Gas & Electric
VMT - vehicle miles traveled
ZEV - zero emission vehicle
Transportation Electrification
VMT Reduction
Building Decarbonization
Consistent. Although this goal is not applicable to an individual commercial development project, the Project is implementing neighborhood design improvements such as pedestrian network improvements and constructing bikeway facilities as part of the project. The Project also includes a redesignation from Expressway Area to Superarterial, which allows for multiple modes of travel traffic, including pedestrian and bikes. This could lead to further development of these types of nonvehicular facilities, including bike lanes and sidewalks, which are not currently allowed under the Expressway Area designation.

In addition, the Project plans to encourage employee commute trip reduction through a variety of strategies. The project will provide carpool incentives, partner with local agencies to provide vanpool services, subsidize transit passes and provide bicycle storage and locker rooms for employees who bike to work. This will reduce the employee VMT and provide incentives for employees to commute to work alternative ways.

Consistent. Although this goal is not applicable to an individual commercial development project, the Project includes an EV parking requirement and includes 45 installed EV spaces.

Consistent. Although this goal is not applicable to an individual commercial development project, the Project plans to use PG&E's Solar Choice program, which provides 100% solar energy to customers. In addition, to the extent applicable to the Project, the Project would meet the CalGreen Building Standards Code in effect at the time of building permit application, which would include a number of energy saving requirements.

Page 1 of 1 ends

Table C-2. Consistency with Fresno Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy Costco Commercial Center
Fresno, California
# Goal Policy Consistency Analysis
Encourage and prioritize full, fair, and equitable
participation by all affected communities in transportation decision-making and planning processes.

Actively work to ensure equitable distribution of the benefits and burdens of transportation projects.

Promote the improvement and expansion of accessible transportation options to serve the needs of all residents, especially those who have historically faced disproportionate transportation burdens.

Encourage alternatives to single-occupancy vehicles that reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and greenhouse gas emissions.

Support investment in and promotion of active transportation and transit to improve public health and mobility, especially in historically underinvested areas.

Encourage sustainable development that focuses growth near activity centers and mobility options that achieve greater location efficiency.

Support local jurisdictions’ efforts to minimize the loss of farmland, environmentally sensitive areas, and natural resources
Support local jurisdictions’ efforts to facilitate the development of diverse housing choices for all income groups.

Facilitate and promote interagency coordination and consistency across planning efforts.

Incentivize and support efforts to improve air quality and minimize pollutants from transportation.

Prioritize investment in and promote multimodal safety measures to reduce traffic fatalities and incidents in the region.

Promote enhanced Transportation Systems Management (TSM) and Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies to reduce congestion and vehicle miles traveled.

Encourage improvements in travel connections across all modes to create an integrated, accessible, and seamless transportation network.

Maximize the cost-effectiveness of transportation improvements.

Encourage investments that increase the system’s resilience to extreme weather events, natural disasters, and pandemics.

Preserve and maintain existing multimodal transportation assets in a state of good repair Support local and regional economic development by leveraging planning and transportation funds that foster public and private investment.

Facilitate efficient, reliable, resilient, and sustainable goods movement.

Support innovative mobility solutions that are accessible, affordable, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and improve air quality.

Consistent. Although this goal is not applicable to an individual commercial development project, the Project would be located nearby to transit stops and thus would allow for utilization of existing transit facilities to visit the Project. In addition, the Project includes an EV parking requirement and includes 45 installed EV spaces.

Support efforts to expand broadband access throughout the region. Not Applicable.

Abbreviations:

EV - electric vehicle
NW - northwest
TDM - Transportation Demand Management
TSM - Transportation Systems Management
VMT - vehicle miles traveled
Consistent. Although this goal is not applicable to an individual commercial development project, the Project will facilitate goods movement to the Fresno area and provide approximately 165 to 175 jobs. 1 Improved mobility and accessibility for all
Consistent. Although this goal is not applicable to an individual commercial development project, it is envisioned that Project's location will provide convenient access for nearby residences for additional retail shopping experiences. In addition, the project is implementing neighborhood design improvements such as pedestrian network improvements and constructing bikeway facilities as part of the project, and will be located in close proximity to transit stops (e.g., NW Herndon-Hayes transit stop).

Consistent. Per the Transportation Impact Analysis, the Project would be consistent with the applicable plans, policies, and programs and would not conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities.

The Project plans to encourage commute trip reduction through a variety of strategies. The Project will provide carpool incentives, partner with local agencies to provide vanpool services, subsidize transit passes and provide bicycle storage and locker rooms for employees who bike to work. This will reduce the employee VMT and provide incentives for employees to commute to work alternative ways.

The Project is implementing neighborhood design improvements such as pedestrian network improvements and constructing bikeway facilities as part of the project. In addition, the Project would be located nearby to transit stops and thus would allow for utilization of existing transit facilities to visit the Project.

Consistent. Although this goal is not applicable to an individual commercial development project, the Project includes a redesignation from Expressway Area to Superarterial, which allows for multiple modes of travel traffic, including pedestrian and bikes. This could lead to further development of these types of non-vehicular facilities, including bike lanes and sidewalks, which are not currently allowed under the Expressway Area designation.

In addition, the project is implementing neighborhood design improvements such as pedestrian network improvements and constructing bikeway facilities as part of the project. The Project will be located nearby transit facilities such as the NW Herndon-Hayes transit stop, thus allowing for alternatives to single-occupancy vehicle visits to the Project that would support efforts to improve air quality and minimize pollutants from transportation.

A region embracing clean transportation,
technology, and innovation 5
Vibrant communities that are accessible by
sustainable transportation options 2
A safe, well-maintained, efficient, and climateresilient multimodal transportation network 3 A transportation network that supports a
sustainable and vibrant economy 4

Page 1 of 1 ends

3. Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Reduction Plan Update - CEQA Project Consistency Checklist GHG Reduction Plan Update consistency review involves the evaluation of project consistency with the applicable strategies of the GHG Reduction Plan Update. The GHG reduction strategies identified in the GHG Reduction Plan Update relies upon the General Plan and additional local measures as the basis of the development related strategies to reduce GHG emissions. This checklist is developed based on the key local GHG reduction strategies and actions identified in the GHG Reduction Plan Update that are applicable to proposed development projects. Note that not all strategies listed below will apply to all projects. For example, not all projects will meet mixed-use related policies of the General Plan, because not all projects are required to be mixed use.

Checklist Item
(Check the appropriate box and provide an explanation for your answer) Relevant General Plan
Policy Yes No Not Applicable (NA) Explanation
1: Land Use and Transportation Demand Strategies
a. Does the project include mixed-use, development? For GHG Reduction Plan consistency, mixed-use development is defined as pedestrian-friendly development that blends two or more residential, commercial, cultural, or institutional, uses, one of which must be residential
Policy UF-1-c, LU-3-b,
Objective-UF 12, UF-12-a,
UF-12-b, UF-12-d,
Policy RC‐2‐a
b. Is the project high density? For GHG Reduction Plan consistency, is the project developed at 12 units per acre or higher?
LU-5-f
c. Is the project infill development, pursuant to the General Plan definition of location within the City limits as of December 31, 2012? LU-2-a, Objective-12,
UF-12-a, UF-12-b, UF-12-d
d. Does the project implement pedestrian bicycle, and transit linkages with surrounding land uses and neighborhoods? For GHG Reduction Plan consistency, the project must include all sidewalks, paths, trails, and facilities required by the General Plan and Active Transportation Plan, as implemented through the Fresno Municipal Code and project conditions of approval.

Policy UF-1-c, UF‐12‐e,
Policy RC-2-a, Objective
MT-4,5,6, Policy MT-4-c,
Policy MT-6-a, Policy POSS7-h Objective MT 8, Policies MT-8-a, MT-8-b
e. If the project includes mixed‐use or high density development, is it located within ½ mile of a High Quality Transit Area as defined in the City’s CEQA Guidelines for Vehicle Miles Traveled? Or, is the project located within 500 feet of an existing or planned transit stop?
Policy UF‐12‐a,
UF-12-b, LU-3-b, Objective
MT 8, Policies MT-8-a,
MT-8-b
f. Will the project accommodate a large employer (over 100 employees) and will it implement trip reduction programs such as increasing transit use, carpooling, vanpooling, bicycling, or other measures to reduce vehicle miles traveled pursuant to San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Rule 9410?
See the SJVAPCD website for details: https://www.valleyair.org/rules/ currntrules/r9410.pdf
Policy MT-8-b, Objective
MT-9, Policy MT-10-c, San
Joaquin Valley Air Pollution
Control District Rule 9410
NA
NA
NA The project is not a mixed-use
or high density development
The project is not a mixed-use development as it does not include residential development.

The project is not high density.

Checklist Item
(Check the appropriate box and provide an explanation for your answer) Relevant General Plan
Policy Yes No Not Applicable (NA) Explanation
g. If the project includes modifications to the transportation network, do those improvements meet the requirements of the City of Fresno’s Complete Streets Policy, adopted in October 2019? According to the policy, a complete street is a transportation facility that is planned, designed, operated, and maintained to provide safe mobility for all users - including bicyclists, pedestrians, transit vehicles, trucks, and motorists - appropriate to the function and context of the facility while connecting to a larger transportation network.

See City of Fresno website for details: https://www.fresno.gov/publicworks/wpcontent/uploads/sites/17/2019/10/Complete-Streets-091119.pdf MT-1-g, MT-1-h
h. Does the project have a less than significant VMT impact, either through satisfying screening criteria or mitigating VMT impacts, pursuant to the City’s adopted VMT thresholds?
See City of Fresno website for details: https://www.fresno.gov/darm/wpcontent/uploads/sites/10/2021/01/CEQA-Guidelines-for-Vehicle-Miles-TraveledFinal-Adopted-Version.pdf MT-2-b, MT-2-c
2: Electric Vehicle Strategies
a. For new multi-family dwelling units with parking, does the project provide EV charging spaces capable of supporting future EV supply equipment (EV capable) at 10% of the parking spaces per 2019 California Green Building Standards Code (CALGREEN, Title 24, Part 11), Section 4.106.4 Policy RC-8-j
b. For new commercial buildings, does project provide EV charging spaces capable of supporting EV capable spaces at 4% to 10% of the parking spaces per 2019 California Green Building Standards Code (CALGREEN, Title 24, Part 11), Section 5.106.5.3
Policy RC-8-j
3: Energy Conservation Strategies
a. Does the project meet or exceed mandatory state building energy codes? If yes, does the project follow any other GreenPoint ratings such as LEED, Energy Star or others? If yes, indicate level of certification-Silver, gold, platinum if applicable?
Policy RC-5-c, Objective
RC-8, Policy RC 8-a
b. For commercial projects, does the project achieve net zero emissions electricity?
Mark NA if project will be permitted before 2030. Mark Yes if voluntary. Add source and capacity in explanation.

Additional Recommended
GHG Plan Measure,
supports Objective RC-8
NA
Of 889 parking spaces, there will be
45 installed EV spaces, which is 5%
of the parking spaces (in range).

Project buildout is in 2023.

The project meets mandatory building energy codes; Costco's warehouse designs are consistent with the requirements of LEED.
yes
The project does not consist
of multi-family dwelling units.
yes
NA
Checklist Item
(Check the appropriate box and provide an explanation for your answer) Relevant General Plan
Policy Yes No Not Applicable (NA) Explanation
4: Water Conservation Strategies
a. Does the project meet or exceed the mandatory outdoor water use measures of the 2019 California Green Building Standards Code (CALGREEN, Title 24, Part 11), Section 4.304?
If the project exceeds CalGreen Code mandatory measures provide methods in excess of requirements in the explanation.

Examples include outdoor water conservation measures such as; drought tolerant landscaping plants, compliant irrigation systems, xeriscape, replacing turf etc. Provide the conservation measure that the project will include in the explanation.

Objective RC-7,
Policy RC-7-a, RC-7-h
b. Does the project meet or exceed the mandatory indoor water use measures of the 2019 California Green Building Standards Code (CALGREEN, Title 24, Part 11), Section 4.303?
If the project exceeds CalGreen Code, mandatory measures provide methods in excess of requirements in the explanation. Examples may include water conserving devices and systems such as water leak detection system, hot water pipe insulation, pressure reducing valves, energy efficient appliances such as Energy Star Certified dishwashers, washing machines, dual flush toilets, point of use and/or tankless water heaters.

Objective RC-7,
Policy RC-7-a, RC-7-e
5: Waste Diversion and Recycling Strategies
a. Does the project implement techniques of solid waste segregation, disposal and reduction, such as recycling, composting, waste to energy technology, and/or waste separation, to reduce the volume of solid wastes that must be sent to landfill facilities?
Policy PU‐9‐a, RC-11-a
b. During construction will the project recycle construction and demolition waste?
Policy RC-11-a
c. Does the project provide recycling canisters in public areas where trashcans are also provided?
Policy RC-11-a
Note: The GHG reduction strategies included in this checklist are based on the GHG reduction strategies identified in the Chapter 5 of the GHG Reduction Plan Update. yes
yes
The project meets the mandatory
indoor water use measures. Highefficiency restroom fixtures save 40% more water.

The project meets the
mandatory outdoor water
use measures.
yes
Costco prefers full metal buildings
in order to use the maximum
amount of recycled material.
yes
yes The project will recycle construction
and demolition waste.

The project will provide recycling
canisters.

Appendix G
Phase II Environmental Site
Assessment

20212904.001A/LH21R122668 Page 1 of 5 February 26, 2021 Copyright 2021 Kleinfelder
24411 Ridge Route Drive, Suite 225, Laguna Hills, CA 92653 p | 949.727.4466 f | 949.727.9242 February 26, 2021
Kleinfelder Project No. 20212904.001A
Costco Wholesale
999 Lake Drive
Issaquah, Washington 98027
Attention: Ms. Kim Katz
Director of Real Estate Development
Subject: Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Report Proposed Costco Warehouse and Gas Station
NE Corner of North Riverside Drive and West Herndon Avenue Fresno, Fresno County, California 93722
N Fresno (Riverside-Relo W031) CW20-0569
Dear Mr. Katz:

Kleinfelder is pleased to provide Costco Wholesale Corporation (Costco) this Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) Report concerning the proposed Costco warehouse and gas station (the “Site”) on the property located at the northeastern corner of West Herndon Avenue and North Riverside Drive, in the City of Fresno, Fresno County, California (see Figure 1).

In summary, ten composite soil samples (including one duplicate) and ten discrete soil samples (including one duplicate) were collected during the Limited Phase II ESA and were submitted for laboratory analysis of organochlorine pesticides (OCPs), arsenic, and lead. The analytical results were compared by Kleinfelder to environmental and human health screening levels and hazardous waste threshold values. The comparisons indicated reported concentrations of OCPs, arsenic, and lead present in the soil samples were below their respective human health screening criteria for commercial/industrial soils, and below thresholds for classification as a California-regulated or Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) hazardous waste. Based on the analytical results, no further assessment for OCPs and metals is presently recommended.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION
The Site consists of approximately 23.74 acres of land northeast of the intersection of North Riverside Drive and West Herndon Avenue. The Site is located on a portion of one parcel of land, identified by the Fresno County Assessor as Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) 503-020-12.

The Site was used as an orchard from at least 1937 through 1998. The Site has been vacant from 2006 to date. An electrical transmission line has been present extending across the Site diagonally from the northwest corner to the eastern side of the Site since at least 1964. Stockpiles of soil and debris were visible on the 2009 aerial photograph.
20212904.001A/LH21R122668 Page 2 of 5 February 26, 2021 Copyright 2021 Kleinfelder
KLEINFELDER 24411 Ridge Route Drive, Suite 225, Laguna Hills, CA 92653 p | 949.727.4466 f | 949.727.9242 Kleinfelder’s draft Phase I ESA, dated January 15, 20211, identified the historical use of the Site as an orchard as a recognized environmental concern (REC) due to the potential presence of arsenic and lead in surface soils, as these metals were often used as a pesticide in orchards. Kleinfelder’s Phase I ESA recommended a Limited Phase II ESA to assess the presence of arsenic, lead, and pesticides and assist in waste characterization during proposed construction activities.

LIMITED PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
The Limited Phase II ESA scope included the following.

Health and Safety Plan Preparation
Prior to initiation of field activities, Kleinfelder prepared a Site-Specific Health and Safety Plan that includes information regarding possible chemical hazards, physical hazards, monitoring equipment, and contingency plans for emergencies that may arise during field activities. This plan was based on the general knowledge of chemical characteristics of materials likely present on the Site. Based on environmental conditions actually present, Level D Protection (with personal protective equipment including gloves, steel-toe rubber boots, hard hat, and eye protection) was adequate for performing the field activities described herein.

Soil Sampling
In total, Kleinfelder collected soil samples from 36 locations, designated SS-1a, -1b, -1c, and -1d through SS-9a, -9b, -9c, and -9d, at the Site. Soil samples were collected from the upper six inches of soil. Kleinfelder used a hand trowel to clear the vegetation from each sample location, and then packed the laboratory-provided glass jars by hand. The glass jars were then labeled with pertinent information and then promptly placed into a (water) ice-chilled cooler for temporary storage.

Prior to the collection of each sample, the hand trowel was cleaned by washing in a non-phosphate detergent (i.e., Liquinox™) and tap water wash, and then rinsing in deionized water.

Laboratory Analyses
The soil samples were submitted to ASSET Laboratories (ASSET), a California Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program-accredited laboratory, for analysis. Soil samples were composited into nine primary soil samples (SS-1 COMPOSITE through SS-9 COMPOSITE) plus one duplicate sample (SS-7 duplicate COMPOSITE) at a four-to-one ratio and analyzed for OCPs, using United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) Method 8081A. Additionally, nine primary discrete soil samples (SS-1@1c through SS-9@9c) plus one duplicate sample (SS-7 duplicate @7d) collected from across the Site were analyzed for arsenic and lead using US EPA Method 6010B.
1 Kleinfelder, 2021. DRAFT - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Proposed Costco Warehouse and Gas Station, NE Corner of North Riverside Drive and West Herndon Avenue, Fresno, Fresno County, California 93722, N Fresno (Riverside-Relo W031) CW20-0569, January 15. 20212904.001A/LH21R122668 Page 3 of 5 February 26, 2021 Copyright 2021 Kleinfelder
KLEINFELDER 24411 Ridge Route Drive, Suite 225, Laguna Hills, CA 92653 p | 949.727.4466 f | 949.727.9242

FIELD OBSERVATIONS AND ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Soil Sampling Analytical Results
A summary of the analytical results for the soil samples follows:
• As Table 1 indicates, ten composite soil samples were analyzed for OCPs, including a duplicate collected of the SS-7 COMPOSITE soil sample. The OCPs 4,4’-dichlorodiphenyldichloroethene (4,4’-DDE), alpha-chlordane, chlordane, and gamma-chlordane had concentrations reported above method detection limits (MDL). The OCPs 4,4’-DDE and gamma-chlordane were reported at concentrations of 0.35 J milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) and 0.32 J mg/kg, respectively, in the SS-2 COMPOSITE soil sample.

The “J” qualifier indicates that the analytical result is above the MDL but below the laboratory reporting limit and is an estimated value. The OCPs alpha-chlordane, chlordane, and gamma-chlordane were reported at concentrations of 0.96 J mg/kg, 12 mg/kg, and

1.2 mg/kg, respectively, in the SS-3 COMPOSITE soil sample. Other OCPs were not present in the samples at concentrations at or above their respective reporting limit. • As Table 2 indicates, ten discrete soil samples were analyzed arsenic and lead, including a duplicate of the SS-07@7d soil sample. Arsenic concentrations were not present in each of the samples at concentrations at or above their respective MDL. Lead concentrations were detected in each sample analyzed and ranged from 4.4 mg/kg to 7.4 mg/kg.

ASSET’s laboratory report of its analyses is attached. Kleinfelder’s evaluation of the analytical results is provided in the next section of this report.

EVALUATION OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS
The soil analytical results were compared to San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (SFBRWQCB) Tier 1 Environmental Screening Levels (ESLs), last updated in July 2019.

The Tier 1 ESLs were designed by the SFBRWQCB to be protective for properties with unrestricted land and water use, and they address media including soil, groundwater, and soil vapor along with a range of concerns including direct exposure human health risks, impact to drinking water, vapor intrusion, and impact to terrestrial habitat. Use of the Tier 1 ESLs applies the most conservative ESL for each analyte of concern. In addition to comparison with the Tier 1 ESLs, the results were also compared to the SFBRWQCB’s commercial/industrial ESLs updated in July 2019.

The soil analytical results were also compared to human-health risk-based screening levels for commercial/industrial soil presented in the California Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), Office of Human and Ecological Risk (HERO) Human Health Risk Assessment (HHRA) Note Number 3, last updated in June 2020, for analytes that have such values. For those analytes without published DTSC HERO screening values (DTSC-SLs) for soil, Kleinfelder compared the measured concentrations in the soil samples to the US EPA’s November 2020 Regional Screening Levels (RSLs) for industrial soil (for Hazard Quotient of 1.0).

Also, in consideration of concentration thresholds for California-regulated and Federal RCRA hazardous wastes, the reported concentrations were compared to their respective California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 22 Total Threshold Limit Concentration (TTLC) value, if an constituent has a published TTLC. Also, to assess whether soluble analysis was warranted, the reported concentrations were compared to 10 times the given constituent’s CCR Title 22 Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration (STLC) and 20 times its Federal Toxicity Characteristics Leaching Potential 20212904.001A/LH21R122668 Page 4 of 5 February 26, 2021 Copyright 2021 Kleinfelder
KLEINFELDER 24411 Ridge Route Drive, Suite 225, Laguna Hills, CA 92653 p | 949.727.4466 f | 949.727.9242 (TCLP) thresholds, if the constituent has such published values (as previously discussed). The soluble results were compared to the respective STLC or TCLP threshold (as applicable). These applicable screening values are included in Tables 1 and 2.

As Table 1 indicates, the OCPs 4,4’-DDE, alpha-chlordane, chlordane, and gamma-chlordane had concentrations reported above MDLs in one or two of the composite soil samples. The reported concentration of 4,4’-DDE did not exceed the Tier 1 or commercial/industrial soil ESLs, commercial/industrial soil DTSC-SL, industrial soil RSL, or the TTLC for 4,4’-DDE. Alpha-chlordane and gamma-chlordane do not have individual screening levels; however, when alpha-chlordane and gamma-chlordane concentrations were added together with chlordane (as additive chlordane isomers), they do not exceed the commercial/industrial soil ESL, commercial/industrial soil DTSC-SL, industrial soil RSL, or the TTLC for chlordane. The chlordane concentration in the SS-2 COMPOSITE sample exceeded the Tier 1 ESL for chlordane, which is protective of terrestrial habitat, and is not a human health screening level or a construction worker exposure screening level. As the chlordane analytical result in the SS-2 COMPOSITE sample does not exceed human health screening levels, and the planned use of the property is development as a Costco warehouse and gas station, no further assessment is recommended.

As Table 2 indicates, arsenic was not detected above MDLs and lead concentrations did not exceed screening levels. However, the MDL for arsenic does exceed the arsenic Tier 1 and commercial/industrial soil ESLs, and the commercial/industrial soil DTSC-SL; though the arsenic MDL does not exceed the industrial RSL. The DTSC and SFBRWQCB have acknowledged that naturally-occurring (i.e., background) levels of arsenic in California soils commonly exceed soil risk-based screening levels for arsenic2
. The MDL for arsenic is two orders of magnitude below
naturally-occurring background arsenic levels. Therefore, it is Kleinfelder’s opinion that the MDL is sufficiently low, and that arsenic is not a concern for the Site.

As also indicated in Table 2, arsenic and lead concentrations did not exceed the given metal’s TTLC, 10 times the STLC, or 20 times the TTLC. Based on the analytical results, soil waste would be considered non-hazardous. Therefore, no further assessment is recommended.

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Kleinfelder’s field observations and evaluations of the analytical results of the 54 samples collected and analyzed during this Limited Phase II ESA have revealed the following:
• The reported OCP concentrations do not exceed the commercial/industrial ESLs, DTSC-SLs, and RSLs for soil. Chlordane in one composite soil sample exceeds the Tier 1 ESL for terrestrial habitat, which is not directly applicable to the commercial development of the Site.
• Arsenic was not detected above the laboratory MDLs.
• Reported lead concentrations in the soil samples did not exceed its respective Tier 1 ESL, or commercial/industrial ESLs, DTSC-SLs, or RSLs.
2 Bradford, GR, Chang AC, Page AL, Bakhtar D, Frampton JA, Wright H, 1996. Background Concentrations of Trace Metals and Major Elements in California Soils, Kearney Foundation of Soil Science, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of California, March 1996. 20212904.001A/LH21R122668 Page 5 of 5 February 26, 2021 Copyright 2021 Kleinfelder
KLEINFELDER 24411 Ridge Route Drive, Suite 225, Laguna Hills, CA 92653 p | 949.727.4466 f | 949.727.9242 • Kleinfelder understands the Site area sampled will be developed by Costco as a parking lot.

Based on the analytical results, no further assessment for OCPs and metals is presently recommended.

LIMITATIONS
Kleinfelder performed this assessment and prepared this report in accordance with generally accepted standards of care that exist in California at this time. This report may be used only by Costco and only for the purposes stated, within a reasonable time from its issuance, but in no event later than 5 years from the date of the report. All information gathered by Kleinfelder is considered confidential and will be released only upon written authorization of Costco or as required by law. Non-compliance with any of these requirements by Costco, unless specifically agreed to in advance by Kleinfelder in writing, will release Kleinfelder from any liability resulting from the use of this report by any unauthorized party, but only to the extent of any such non-compliance by Costco. Further limitations applicable hereto may be set forth in Costco’s written agreement with Kleinfelder covering the work performed herein.

Kleinfelder’s professional opinions and recommendations are based on a limited number of field observations and tests, designed, collected, and performed in accordance with the generally accepted engineering practice that exists at the time. Consequently, no warranty or guarantee, expressed or implied, is intended or made.

CLOSING REMARKS
Thank you for the opportunity to provide Kleinfelder’s professional environmental services to Costco. Kleinfelder looks forward to future work with you on other projects. Please feel free to call the undersigned should you have questions.

Sincerely,
KLEINFELDER, INC.

Lindsey Dandridge-Perry Lizanne Simmons, PG 7431
Project Professional Senior Principal Geologist
cc: Andy Franks, Kleinfelder
Paolo Dizon, Kleinfelder
Attachments: Figure
1 – Sample Location Map
Tables
1 – Soil Analytical Results Summary – Organochlorine Pesticides 2 – Soil Analytical Results Summary – Arsenic and Lead
Analytical Laboratory Report
20212904.001A/LH21R122668 February 26, 2021
Copyright 2021 Kleinfelder
FIGURE
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!( !(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
N
O
RT
H
R
VI ER
S
DI E D
R
VI E

WEST HERNDON AVENUE
9d
2b
2d
5c
7d
5d
5a
9a
2c
8d
7c
3c
3b
6c
1a
4c
6d
1d
4d
5b
1c
6a
8b
4b
7a 7b
4a
3d
8c
1b
8a
3a
9b
6b
2a
9c
The information included on this graphic representation has been compiled from a variety of sources and is subject to change without notice. Kleinfelder makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or rights to the use of such information. This document is not intended for use as a land survey product nor is it designed or intended as a construction design document. The use or misuse of the information contained on this graphic representation is at the sole risk of the party using or misusing the information. 0 100 200
Feet
Aerial: ESRI World Imagery, Maxar
Metro 5/10/2020.

Locations are Approximate £
SAMPLE LOCATION MAP PROJECT:

FILE NAME:

FIGURE
1 DRAWN:

CHECKED BY:

DRAWN BY:

PhaseII_Fig1.mxd
KFH
PLOTTED: 2/26/2021 11:32:40 A
M, KHagan
Explanation
!( Sampling Location
Approximate Site
Boundary
LDP

LIMITED PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT

PROPOSED COSTCO WAREHOUSE AND GAS STATION

NE CORNER OF NORTH RIVERSIDE DRIVE

AND WEST HERNDON AVENUE
FRESNO, FRESNO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 93722
N FRESNO (RIVERSIDE-RELO W031) CW20-0569
FILE: L:\2021\20211904.001A - CSM Costco Carson CA ENV\2.0 Technical Information\2.8 GIS 20212904
FEB 2021
LA

GUNA HILLS, CA
20212904.001A/LH21R122668 February 26, 2021
Copyright 2021 Kleinfelder
TABLES
Table 1
Soil Analytical Results Summary – Organochlorine Pesticides Proposed Costco Warehouse and Gas Station
Northeast Corner of North Riverside Drive and West Herndon Avenue Fresno, California 93722
4,4'-DDD 4,4'-DDE 4,4'-DDT
alphaChlordane Chlordane gamma- Chlordane Other OCPs
µg/kg µg/kg µg/kg µg/kg µg/kg µg/kg µg/kg
8081A 8081A 8081A 8081A 8081A 8081A 8081A
2/16/2021 ND<0.68 ND<0.35 ND<0.43 ND<0.52 ND<2.4 ND<0.28 ND<0.24-15 2/16/2021 ND<0.67 0.35 J ND<0.43 ND<0.52 ND<2.4 0.32 J ND<0.24-152/16/2021 ND<0.67 ND<0.35 ND<0.43 0.96 J 12 1.2 ND<0.24-152/16/2021 ND<0.68 ND<0.35 ND<0.43 ND<0.52 ND<2.4 ND<0.28 ND<0.24-152/16/2021 ND<0.68 ND<0.35 ND<0.43 ND<0.52 ND<2.4 ND<0.28 ND<0.24-152/16/2021 ND<0.67 ND<0.35 ND<0.43 ND<0.52 ND<2.4 ND<0.28 ND<0.24-152/16/2021 ND<0.68 ND<0.35 ND<0.43 ND<0.52 ND<2.4 ND<0.28 ND<0.24-152/16/2021 ND<0.67 ND<0.35 ND<0.43 ND<0.52 ND<2.4 ND<0.27 ND<0.24-152/16/2021 ND<0.67 ND<0.35 ND<0.43 ND<0.51 ND<2.3 ND<0.27 ND<0.23-142/16/2021 ND<0.67 ND<0.35 ND<0.43 ND<0.52 ND<2.4 ND<0.28 ND<0.24-14 2,700 330 110 NV 8.5 NV Vary by analyte or NV
12,000 8,300 8,500 NV 2,200 NV Vary by analyte or NV
6,200 9,300 7,100 NV 6,100 NV Vary by analyte or NV9,600 9,300 8,500 NV 7,700 NV Vary by analyte or NV1,000 1,000 1,000 NV 2,500 NV Vary by analyte or NV 100 100 100 NV 250 NV Vary by analyte or NV
NV NV NV NV 30 NV Vary by analyte or NV
10 x STLC 1,000 1,000 1,000 NV 2,500 NV Vary by analyte or NV 20 x TCLP NV NV NV NV 600 NV Vary by analyte or NV
Notes:

DDD Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane.

DDE Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethene.

DDT Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane.

OCPs Organochlorine pesticides, analyzed using US EPA Method 8081. µg/kg Micrograms per kilogram.
µg/L Micrograms per liter.
8081A United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) analytical method number.

ND<X Not detected at a concentration at or above the laboratory method detection limit, which follows the "less than" symbol (<).

NV Analyte has no published value.

ESL San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board Environmental Screening Level for shallow soils (July 2019).

DTSC-SL Department of Toxic Substances Control-recommended modified screening level for commercial/industrial soil (June 2020).

RSL US EPA Regional Screening Level for industrial soil (November 2020).

TTLC California Code of Regulations Title 22 Total Threshold Limit Concentration.

STLC California Code of Regulations Title 22 Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration.TCLP Federal Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure.

STLC (µg/L)TCLP (µg/L)
ESL - Commercial/Industrial
DTSC-SL - Commercial/Industrial
RSL - Industrial
Date
Sampled
ESL - Tier 1
TTLC (µg/kg)
SS-1 COMPOSITE
SS-2 COMPOSITE
SS-3 COMPOSITE
Sample
SS-4 COMPOSITE SS-9 COMPOSITE SS-5 COMPOSITE SS-6 COMPOSITE SS-7 COMPOSITE SS-7 duplicate COMPOSITE
SS-8 COMPOSITE
20212904.001A.001A/LH21R122668Copyright 2021 Kleinfelder

Page 1 of 1 ends

Table 2
Soil Analytical Results Summary – Arsenic and Lead
Proposed Costco Warehouse and Gas Station
Northeast Corner of North Riverside Drive and West Herndon Avenue Fresno, California 93722
Arsenic Lead(mg/kg) (mg/kg)
6010B 6010B
SS-01@1c 2/16/2021 ND<0.54 5.8
SS-02@2d 2/16/2021 ND<0.54 5.5SS-03@3b 2/16/2021 ND<0.54 6.1SS-04@4d 2/16/2021 ND<0.54 5.8SS-05@5a 2/16/2021 ND<0.54 4.4SS-06@6a 2/16/2021 ND<0.54 6.1SS-07@7d 2/16/2021 ND<0.54 5.6 SS-07 duplicate @7d 2/16/2021 ND<0.54 5.6
SS-08@8b 2/16/2021 ND<0.54 5.6
SS-09@9c 2/16/2021 ND<0.54 7.4

0.067 32

0.31 3200.36 320

3.0 800
500 1,000

5.0 5.05.0 5.0
10 x STLC 50 5020 x TCLP 100 100
Notes:
mg/kg Milligrams per kilogram.
mg/L Milligrams per liter.
6010B United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) analytical method number.

ND<X Not present at a concentration at or above the method detection limit, which follows the "less than" symbol (<).

ESL San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board Environmental Screening Level for shallow soils (July 2019).

DTSC-SL Department of Toxic Substances Control-recommended screening level for commercial/industrial soil (June 2020).

RSL US EPA Regional Screening Level for industrial soil (November 2020).

TTLC California Code of Regulations Title 22 Total Threshold Limit Concentration.

STLC California Code of Regulations Title 22 Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration.TCLP Federal Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure.

TCLP (mg/L)
DTSC-SL - Commercial/Industrial
Sample Date Sampled
ESL - Commercial/Industrial
RSL - Industrial
TTLC
STLC (mg/L)
ESL - Tier 1
20212904.001A/LH21R122668Copyright 2021 Kleinfelder

Page 1 of 1 ends

20212904.001A/LH21R122668 February 26, 2021
Copyright 2021 Kleinfelder

ANALYTICAL LABORATORY REPORTS
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism” ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
February 18, 2021
Kleinfelder
Lindsey Dandridge-Perry
Attention: Lindsey Dandridge-Perry
RE: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03
FAX: Workorder No.: N044190
TEL: (949) 585-3133
24411 Ridge Route Dr. #225
Laguna Hills, CA 92653
Thank you for the opportunity to service the needs of your company.

Please feel free to call me at (562) 219-7435 if I can be of further assistance to your company.

Sincerely,
AndrewGaraniel
Laboratory Director
Enclosed are the results for sample(s) received on February 16, 2021 by ASSET Laboratories. The sample(s) are tested for the parameters as indicated in the enclosed chain of custody in accordance with the applicable laboratory certifications.

The cover letter is an integral part of this analytical report. This Laboratory Report cannot be reproduced in part or in its entirety without written permission from the client and ASSET Laboratories - California. 1 of 30
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism” ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
ASSET Laboratories Date: 18-Feb-21
Project: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03
CLIENT: Kleinfelder
Lab Order: N044190

CASE NARRATIVE
SAMPLE RECEIVING/GENERAL COMMENTS:

All sample containers were received intact with proper chain of custody documentation.

Information on sample receipt conditions including discrepancies can be found in attached Sample Receipt Checklist Form.

Cooler temperature and sample preservation were verified upon receipt ofsamples if applicable.

Samples were analyzed within method holding time.

Results were J-Flag. "J" is used to flag those results that are between the PQL (Practical Quantitation Limit) and the calculated MDL (Method Detection Limit). Results that are "J" Flagged are estimated values since it becomes difficult to accurately quantitate the analyte near the MDL.

Analytical comments for EPA 8081A:

RPD for Matrix Spike (MS)/Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD) is outside criteria on analyte 4,4´-DDT; however, the analytical batch was validated by the Laboratory Control Sample (LCS). 2 of 30
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism” ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
ASSET Laboratories Date: 18-Feb-21
Project: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03
CLIENT: Kleinfelder
Lab Order: N044190
Work Order Sample Summary
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Matrix Collection Date Date Received Contract No:

Date Reported
N044190-001A SS-1a Soil 2/16/2021 8:05:00 AM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 N044190-002A SS-1b Soil 2/16/2021 8:15:00 AM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 N044190-003A SS-1c Soil 2/16/2021 8:10:00 AM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 N044190-004A SS-1d Soil 2/16/2021 8:20:00 AM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 N044190-005A SS-1 COMPOSITE Soil 2/16/2021 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 N044190-006A SS-2a Soil 2/16/2021 8:30:00 AM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 N044190-007A SS-2b Soil 2/16/2021 8:35:00 AM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 N044190-008A SS-2c Soil 2/16/2021 8:50:00 AM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 N044190-009A SS-2d Soil 2/16/2021 8:40:00 AM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 N044190-010A SS-2 COMPOSITE Soil 2/16/2021 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 N044190-011A SS-3a Soil 2/16/2021 9:55:00 AM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 N044190-012A SS-3b Soil 2/16/2021 9:45:00 AM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 N044190-013A SS-3c Soil 2/16/2021 10:00:00 AM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 N044190-014A SS-3d Soil 2/16/2021 9:40:00 AM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 N044190-015A SS-3 COMPOSITE Soil 2/16/2021 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 N044190-016A SS-4a Soil 2/16/2021 9:00:00 AM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 N044190-017A SS-4b Soil 2/16/2021 9:07:00 AM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 N044190-018A SS-4c Soil 2/16/2021 9:25:00 AM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 N044190-019A SS-4d Soil 2/16/2021 9:15:00 AM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 N044190-020A SS-4 COMPOSITE Soil 2/16/2021 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 N044190-021A SS-5a Soil 2/16/2021 12:00:00 PM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 N044190-022A SS-5b Soil 2/16/2021 12:20:00 PM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 N044190-023A SS-5c Soil 2/16/2021 12:10:00 PM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 N044190-024A SS-5d Soil 2/16/2021 12:15:00 PM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 N044190-025A SS-5 COMPOSITE Soil 2/16/2021 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 N044190-026A SS-6a Soil 2/16/2021 12:25:00 PM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 N044190-027A SS-6b Soil 2/16/2021 12:35:00 PM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 N044190-028A SS-6c Soil 2/16/2021 12:45:00 PM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 N044190-029A SS-6d Soil 2/16/2021 12:40:00 PM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 3 of 30
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism” ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03
CLIENT: Kleinfelder
Lab Order: N044190
Work Order Sample Summary
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Matrix Collection Date Date Received Contract No:

Date Reported
N044190-030A SS-6 COMPOSITE Soil 2/16/2021 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 N044190-031A SS-7a Soil 2/16/2021 2:10:00 PM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 N044190-032A SS-7b Soil 2/16/2021 1:55:00 PM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 N044190-033A SS-7c Soil 2/16/2021 2:25:00 PM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 N044190-034A SS-7d Soil 2/16/2021 1:30:00 PM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 N044190-035A SS-7 COMPOSITE Soil 2/16/2021 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 N044190-036A SS-7a duplicate Soil 2/16/2021 2:15:00 PM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 N044190-037A SS-7b duplicate Soil 2/16/2021 2:00:00 PM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 N044190-038A SS-7c duplicate Soil 2/16/2021 2:30:00 PM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 N044190-039A SS-7d duplicate Soil 2/16/2021 1:35:00 PM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 N044190-040A SS-7 duplicate COMPOSITE Soil 2/16/2021 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 N044190-041A SS-8a Soil 2/16/2021 12:50:00 PM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 N044190-042A SS-8b Soil 2/16/2021 12:55:00 PM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 N044190-043A SS-8c Soil 2/16/2021 1:10:00 PM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 N044190-044A SS-8d Soil 2/16/2021 1:05:00 PM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 N044190-045A SS-8 COMPOSITE Soil 2/16/2021 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 N044190-046A SS-9a Soil 2/16/2021 2:40:00 PM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 N044190-047A SS-9b Soil 2/16/2021 2:45:00 PM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 N044190-048A SS-9c Soil 2/16/2021 2:55:00 PM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 N044190-049A SS-9d Soil 2/16/2021 3:05:00 PM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 N044190-050A SS-9 COMPOSITE Soil 2/16/2021 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 N044190-051A SS-01@1c Soil 2/16/2021 8:12:00 AM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 N044190-052A SS-02@2d Soil 2/16/2021 8:43:00 AM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 N044190-053A SS-03@3b Soil 2/16/2021 9:50:00 AM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 N044190-054A SS-04@4d Soil 2/16/2021 9:20:00 AM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 N044190-055A SS-05@5a Soil 2/16/2021 12:05:00 PM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 N044190-056A SS-06@6a Soil 2/16/2021 12:30:00 PM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 N044190-057A SS-07@7d Soil 2/16/2021 1:40:00 PM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 N044190-058A SS-07 duplicate@7d Soil 2/16/2021 1:45:00 PM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 N044190-059A SS-08@8b Soil 2/16/2021 1:00:00 PM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 4 of 30
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism” ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03
CLIENT: Kleinfelder
Lab Order: N044190
Work Order Sample Summary
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Matrix Collection Date Date Received Contract No:

Date Reported
N044190-060A SS-09@9c Soil 2/16/2021 3:00:00 PM 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 5 of 30
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism” ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03
Client Sample ID: SS-1 COMPOSITE
Collection Date: 2/16/2021
Matrix: SOIL
CLIENT: Kleinfelder
Lab Order: N044190
Lab ID: N044190-005
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 18-Feb-21
Analyses Result MDL PQL Qual Units DF Date Analyzed

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES BY GC/ECD
EPA 8081A
Analyst: YG
EPA 3546
RunID: NV00922-GC7_210217A QC Batch: 85282 PrepDate: 2/17/2021 4,4´-DDD ND 0.68 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 02:31 PM
4,4´-DDE ND 0.35 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 02:31 PM
4,4´-DDT ND 0.43 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 02:31 PM
Aldrin ND 0.28 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 02:31 PM
alpha-BHC ND 0.44 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 02:31 PM
alpha-Chlordane ND 0.52 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 02:31 PM
beta-BHC ND 0.35 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 02:31 PM
Chlordane ND 2.4 8.5 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 02:31 PM
delta-BHC ND 0.45 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 02:31 PM
Dieldrin ND 0.44 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 02:31 PM
Endosulfan I ND 0.30 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 02:31 PM
Endosulfan II ND 0.61 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 02:31 PM
Endosulfan sulfate ND 0.49 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 02:31 PM Endrin ND 1.0 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 02:31 PM
Endrin aldehyde ND 0.90 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 02:31 PM
Endrin ketone ND 0.58 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 02:31 PM
gamma-BHC ND 0.24 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 02:31 PM
gamma-Chlordane ND 0.28 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 02:31 PM
Heptachlor ND 0.60 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 02:31 PM
Heptachlor epoxide ND 0.27 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 02:31 PM Methoxychlor ND 2.8 8.5 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 02:31 PM
Toxaphene ND 15 85 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 02:31 PM
Surr: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 49.9 0 32-100 %REC 1 2/17/2021 02:31 PM Surr: Decachlorobiphenyl 56.0 0 26-104 %REC 1 2/17/2021 02:31 PM Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out 6 of 30
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism” ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03
Client Sample ID: SS-2 COMPOSITE
Collection Date: 2/16/2021
Matrix: SOIL
CLIENT: Kleinfelder
Lab Order: N044190
Lab ID: N044190-010
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 18-Feb-21
Analyses Result MDL PQL Qual Units DF Date Analyzed

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES BY GC/ECD
EPA 8081A
Analyst: YG
EPA 3546
RunID: NV00922-GC7_210217A QC Batch: 85282 PrepDate: 2/17/2021 4,4´-DDD ND 0.67 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 02:57 PM
4,4´-DDE 0.35 0.35 2.0 J µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 02:57 PM
4,4´-DDT ND 0.43 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 02:57 PM
Aldrin ND 0.28 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 02:57 PM
alpha-BHC ND 0.43 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 02:57 PM
alpha-Chlordane ND 0.52 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 02:57 PM
beta-BHC ND 0.34 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 02:57 PM
Chlordane ND 2.4 8.5 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 02:57 PM
delta-BHC ND 0.45 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 02:57 PM
Dieldrin ND 0.44 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 02:57 PM
Endosulfan I ND 0.30 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 02:57 PM
Endosulfan II ND 0.61 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 02:57 PM
Endosulfan sulfate ND 0.48 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 02:57 PM Endrin ND 1.0 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 02:57 PM
Endrin aldehyde ND 0.90 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 02:57 PM
Endrin ketone ND 0.58 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 02:57 PM
gamma-BHC ND 0.24 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 02:57 PM
gamma-Chlordane 0.32 0.28 1.0 J µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 02:57 PM Heptachlor ND 0.60 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 02:57 PM
Heptachlor epoxide ND 0.27 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 02:57 PM Methoxychlor ND 2.8 8.5 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 02:57 PM
Toxaphene ND 14 85 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 02:57 PM
Surr: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 52.6 0 32-100 %REC 1 2/17/2021 02:57 PM Surr: Decachlorobiphenyl 54.7 0 26-104 %REC 1 2/17/2021 02:57 PM Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out 7 of 30
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism” ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03
Client Sample ID: SS-3 COMPOSITE
Collection Date: 2/16/2021
Matrix: SOIL
CLIENT: Kleinfelder
Lab Order: N044190
Lab ID: N044190-015
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 18-Feb-21
Analyses Result MDL PQL Qual Units DF Date Analyzed

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES BY GC/ECD
EPA 8081A
Analyst: YG
EPA 3546
RunID: NV00922-GC7_210217A QC Batch: 85282 PrepDate: 2/17/2021 4,4´-DDD ND 0.67 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 03:22 PM
4,4´-DDE ND 0.35 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 03:22 PM
4,4´-DDT ND 0.43 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 03:22 PM
Aldrin ND 0.28 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 03:22 PM
alpha-BHC ND 0.44 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 03:22 PM
alpha-Chlordane 0.96 0.52 1.0 J µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 03:22 PM beta-BHC ND 0.35 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 03:22 PM
Chlordane 12 2.4 8.5 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 03:22 PM
delta-BHC ND 0.45 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 03:22 PM
Dieldrin ND 0.44 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 03:22 PM
Endosulfan I ND 0.30 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 03:22 PM
Endosulfan II ND 0.61 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 03:22 PM
Endosulfan sulfate ND 0.49 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 03:22 PM Endrin ND 1.0 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 03:22 PM
Endrin aldehyde ND 0.90 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 03:22 PM
Endrin ketone ND 0.58 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 03:22 PM
gamma-BHC ND 0.24 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 03:22 PM
gamma-Chlordane 1.2 0.28 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 03:22 PM Heptachlor ND 0.60 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 03:22 PM
Heptachlor epoxide ND 0.27 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 03:22 PM Methoxychlor ND 2.8 8.5 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 03:22 PM
Toxaphene ND 15 85 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 03:22 PM
Surr: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 53.7 0 32-100 %REC 1 2/17/2021 03:22 PM Surr: Decachlorobiphenyl 51.5 0 26-104 %REC 1 2/17/2021 03:22 PM Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out 8 of 30
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism” ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03
Client Sample ID: SS-4 COMPOSITE
Collection Date: 2/16/2021
Matrix: SOIL
CLIENT: Kleinfelder
Lab Order: N044190
Lab ID: N044190-020
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 18-Feb-21
Analyses Result MDL PQL Qual Units DF Date Analyzed

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES BY GC/ECD
EPA 8081A
Analyst: YG
EPA 3546
RunID: NV00922-GC7_210217A QC Batch: 85282 PrepDate: 2/17/2021 4,4´-DDD ND 0.68 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 04:20 PM
4,4´-DDE ND 0.35 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 04:20 PM
4,4´-DDT ND 0.43 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 04:20 PM
Aldrin ND 0.28 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 04:20 PM
alpha-BHC ND 0.44 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 04:20 PM
alpha-Chlordane ND 0.52 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 04:20 PM
beta-BHC ND 0.35 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 04:20 PM
Chlordane ND 2.4 8.5 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 04:20 PM
delta-BHC ND 0.45 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 04:20 PM
Dieldrin ND 0.44 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 04:20 PM
Endosulfan I ND 0.30 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 04:20 PM
Endosulfan II ND 0.61 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 04:20 PM
Endosulfan sulfate ND 0.49 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 04:20 PM Endrin ND 1.0 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 04:20 PM
Endrin aldehyde ND 0.90 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 04:20 PM
Endrin ketone ND 0.58 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 04:20 PM
gamma-BHC ND 0.24 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 04:20 PM
gamma-Chlordane ND 0.28 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 04:20 PM
Heptachlor ND 0.60 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 04:20 PM
Heptachlor epoxide ND 0.27 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 04:20 PM Methoxychlor ND 2.8 8.5 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 04:20 PM
Toxaphene ND 15 85 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 04:20 PM
Surr: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 57.1 0 32-100 %REC 1 2/17/2021 04:20 PM Surr: Decachlorobiphenyl 58.9 0 26-104 %REC 1 2/17/2021 04:20 PM Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out 9 of 30
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism” ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03
Client Sample ID: SS-5 COMPOSITE
Collection Date: 2/16/2021
Matrix: SOIL
CLIENT: Kleinfelder
Lab Order: N044190
Lab ID: N044190-025
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 18-Feb-21
Analyses Result MDL PQL Qual Units DF Date Analyzed

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES BY GC/ECD
EPA 8081A
Analyst: YG
EPA 3546
RunID: NV00922-GC7_210217A QC Batch: 85282 PrepDate: 2/17/2021 4,4´-DDD ND 0.68 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 04:46 PM
4,4´-DDE ND 0.35 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 04:46 PM
4,4´-DDT ND 0.43 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 04:46 PM
Aldrin ND 0.28 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 04:46 PM
alpha-BHC ND 0.44 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 04:46 PM
alpha-Chlordane ND 0.52 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 04:46 PM
beta-BHC ND 0.35 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 04:46 PM
Chlordane ND 2.4 8.5 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 04:46 PM
delta-BHC ND 0.45 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 04:46 PM
Dieldrin ND 0.44 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 04:46 PM
Endosulfan I ND 0.30 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 04:46 PM
Endosulfan II ND 0.61 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 04:46 PM
Endosulfan sulfate ND 0.49 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 04:46 PM Endrin ND 1.0 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 04:46 PM
Endrin aldehyde ND 0.90 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 04:46 PM
Endrin ketone ND 0.58 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 04:46 PM
gamma-BHC ND 0.24 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 04:46 PM
gamma-Chlordane ND 0.28 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 04:46 PM
Heptachlor ND 0.60 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 04:46 PM
Heptachlor epoxide ND 0.27 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 04:46 PM Methoxychlor ND 2.8 8.5 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 04:46 PM
Toxaphene ND 15 85 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 04:46 PM
Surr: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 61.0 0 32-100 %REC 1 2/17/2021 04:46 PM Surr: Decachlorobiphenyl 55.0 0 26-104 %REC 1 2/17/2021 04:46 PM Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out 10 of 30
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism” ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03
Client Sample ID: SS-6 COMPOSITE
Collection Date: 2/16/2021
Matrix: SOIL
CLIENT: Kleinfelder
Lab Order: N044190
Lab ID: N044190-030
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 18-Feb-21
Analyses Result MDL PQL Qual Units DF Date Analyzed

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES BY GC/ECD
EPA 8081A
Analyst: YG
EPA 3546
RunID: NV00922-GC7_210217A QC Batch: 85282 PrepDate: 2/17/2021 4,4´-DDD ND 0.67 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 05:12 PM
4,4´-DDE ND 0.35 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 05:12 PM
4,4´-DDT ND 0.43 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 05:12 PM
Aldrin ND 0.28 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 05:12 PM
alpha-BHC ND 0.43 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 05:12 PM
alpha-Chlordane ND 0.52 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 05:12 PM
beta-BHC ND 0.34 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 05:12 PM
Chlordane ND 2.4 8.5 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 05:12 PM
delta-BHC ND 0.45 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 05:12 PM
Dieldrin ND 0.44 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 05:12 PM
Endosulfan I ND 0.30 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 05:12 PM
Endosulfan II ND 0.61 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 05:12 PM
Endosulfan sulfate ND 0.48 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 05:12 PM Endrin ND 1.0 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 05:12 PM
Endrin aldehyde ND 0.90 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 05:12 PM
Endrin ketone ND 0.58 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 05:12 PM
gamma-BHC ND 0.24 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 05:12 PM
gamma-Chlordane ND 0.28 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 05:12 PM
Heptachlor ND 0.60 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 05:12 PM
Heptachlor epoxide ND 0.27 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 05:12 PM Methoxychlor ND 2.8 8.5 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 05:12 PM
Toxaphene ND 14 85 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 05:12 PM
Surr: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 70.6 0 32-100 %REC 1 2/17/2021 05:12 PM Surr: Decachlorobiphenyl 56.6 0 26-104 %REC 1 2/17/2021 05:12 PM Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out 11 of 30
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism” ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03
Client Sample ID: SS-7 COMPOSITE
Collection Date: 2/16/2021
Matrix: SOIL
CLIENT: Kleinfelder
Lab Order: N044190
Lab ID: N044190-035
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 18-Feb-21
Analyses Result MDL PQL Qual Units DF Date Analyzed

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES BY GC/ECD
EPA 8081A
Analyst: YG
EPA 3546
RunID: NV00922-GC7_210217A QC Batch: 85282 PrepDate: 2/17/2021 4,4´-DDD ND 0.68 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 05:37 PM
4,4´-DDE ND 0.35 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 05:37 PM
4,4´-DDT ND 0.43 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 05:37 PM
Aldrin ND 0.28 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 05:37 PM
alpha-BHC ND 0.44 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 05:37 PM
alpha-Chlordane ND 0.52 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 05:37 PM
beta-BHC ND 0.35 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 05:37 PM
Chlordane ND 2.4 8.5 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 05:37 PM
delta-BHC ND 0.45 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 05:37 PM
Dieldrin ND 0.44 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 05:37 PM
Endosulfan I ND 0.30 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 05:37 PM
Endosulfan II ND 0.61 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 05:37 PM
Endosulfan sulfate ND 0.49 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 05:37 PM Endrin ND 1.0 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 05:37 PM
Endrin aldehyde ND 0.90 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 05:37 PM
Endrin ketone ND 0.58 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 05:37 PM
gamma-BHC ND 0.24 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 05:37 PM
gamma-Chlordane ND 0.28 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 05:37 PM
Heptachlor ND 0.60 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 05:37 PM
Heptachlor epoxide ND 0.27 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 05:37 PM Methoxychlor ND 2.8 8.5 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 05:37 PM
Toxaphene ND 15 85 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 05:37 PM
Surr: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 41.7 0 32-100 %REC 1 2/17/2021 05:37 PM Surr: Decachlorobiphenyl 49.5 0 26-104 %REC 1 2/17/2021 05:37 PM Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out 12 of 30
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism” ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03
Client Sample ID: SS-7 duplicate COMPOSITE
Collection Date: 2/16/2021
Matrix: SOIL
CLIENT: Kleinfelder
Lab Order: N044190
Lab ID: N044190-040
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 18-Feb-21
Analyses Result MDL PQL Qual Units DF Date Analyzed

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES BY GC/ECD
EPA 8081A
Analyst: YG
EPA 3546
RunID: NV00922-GC7_210217A QC Batch: 85282 PrepDate: 2/17/2021 4,4´-DDD ND 0.67 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 06:03 PM
4,4´-DDE ND 0.35 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 06:03 PM
4,4´-DDT ND 0.43 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 06:03 PM
Aldrin ND 0.28 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 06:03 PM
alpha-BHC ND 0.43 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 06:03 PM
alpha-Chlordane ND 0.52 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 06:03 PM
beta-BHC ND 0.34 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 06:03 PM
Chlordane ND 2.4 8.5 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 06:03 PM
delta-BHC ND 0.45 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 06:03 PM
Dieldrin ND 0.44 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 06:03 PM
Endosulfan I ND 0.30 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 06:03 PM
Endosulfan II ND 0.61 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 06:03 PM
Endosulfan sulfate ND 0.48 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 06:03 PM Endrin ND 1.0 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 06:03 PM
Endrin aldehyde ND 0.90 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 06:03 PM
Endrin ketone ND 0.58 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 06:03 PM
gamma-BHC ND 0.24 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 06:03 PM
gamma-Chlordane ND 0.27 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 06:03 PM
Heptachlor ND 0.60 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 06:03 PM
Heptachlor epoxide ND 0.27 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 06:03 PM Methoxychlor ND 2.8 8.5 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 06:03 PM
Toxaphene ND 14 85 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 06:03 PM
Surr: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 53.3 0 32-100 %REC 1 2/17/2021 06:03 PM Surr: Decachlorobiphenyl 53.0 0 26-104 %REC 1 2/17/2021 06:03 PM Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out 13 of 30
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism” ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03
Client Sample ID: SS-8 COMPOSITE
Collection Date: 2/16/2021
Matrix: SOIL
CLIENT: Kleinfelder
Lab Order: N044190
Lab ID: N044190-045
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 18-Feb-21
Analyses Result MDL PQL Qual Units DF Date Analyzed

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES BY GC/ECD
EPA 8081A
Analyst: YG
EPA 3546
RunID: NV00922-GC7_210217A QC Batch: 85282 PrepDate: 2/17/2021 4,4´-DDD ND 0.67 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 06:29 PM
4,4´-DDE ND 0.35 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 06:29 PM
4,4´-DDT ND 0.43 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 06:29 PM
Aldrin ND 0.28 0.99 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 06:29 PM
alpha-BHC ND 0.43 0.99 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 06:29 PM
alpha-Chlordane ND 0.51 0.99 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 06:29 PM beta-BHC ND 0.34 0.99 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 06:29 PM
Chlordane ND 2.3 8.4 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 06:29 PM
delta-BHC ND 0.45 0.99 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 06:29 PM
Dieldrin ND 0.44 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 06:29 PM
Endosulfan I ND 0.30 0.99 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 06:29 PM
Endosulfan II ND 0.61 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 06:29 PM
Endosulfan sulfate ND 0.48 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 06:29 PM Endrin ND 1.0 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 06:29 PM
Endrin aldehyde ND 0.90 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 06:29 PM
Endrin ketone ND 0.58 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 06:29 PM
gamma-BHC ND 0.23 0.99 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 06:29 PM
gamma-Chlordane ND 0.27 0.99 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 06:29 PM Heptachlor ND 0.60 0.99 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 06:29 PM
Heptachlor epoxide ND 0.27 0.99 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 06:29 PM Methoxychlor ND 2.8 8.4 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 06:29 PM
Toxaphene ND 14 84 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 06:29 PM
Surr: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 51.7 0 32-100 %REC 1 2/17/2021 06:29 PM Surr: Decachlorobiphenyl 52.0 0 26-104 %REC 1 2/17/2021 06:29 PM Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out 14 of 30
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism” ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03
Client Sample ID: SS-9 COMPOSITE
Collection Date: 2/16/2021
Matrix: SOIL
CLIENT: Kleinfelder
Lab Order: N044190
Lab ID: N044190-050
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 18-Feb-21
Analyses Result MDL PQL Qual Units DF Date Analyzed

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES BY GC/ECD
EPA 8081A
Analyst: YG
EPA 3546
RunID: NV00922-GC7_210217A QC Batch: 85282 PrepDate: 2/17/2021 4,4´-DDD ND 0.67 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 06:55 PM
4,4´-DDE ND 0.35 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 06:55 PM
4,4´-DDT ND 0.43 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 06:55 PM
Aldrin ND 0.28 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 06:55 PM
alpha-BHC ND 0.43 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 06:55 PM
alpha-Chlordane ND 0.52 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 06:55 PM
beta-BHC ND 0.34 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 06:55 PM
Chlordane ND 2.4 8.5 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 06:55 PM
delta-BHC ND 0.45 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 06:55 PM
Dieldrin ND 0.44 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 06:55 PM
Endosulfan I ND 0.30 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 06:55 PM
Endosulfan II ND 0.61 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 06:55 PM
Endosulfan sulfate ND 0.48 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 06:55 PM Endrin ND 1.0 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 06:55 PM
Endrin aldehyde ND 0.90 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 06:55 PM
Endrin ketone ND 0.58 2.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 06:55 PM
gamma-BHC ND 0.24 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 06:55 PM
gamma-Chlordane ND 0.28 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 06:55 PM
Heptachlor ND 0.60 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 06:55 PM
Heptachlor epoxide ND 0.27 1.0 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 06:55 PM Methoxychlor ND 2.8 8.5 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 06:55 PM
Toxaphene ND 14 85 µg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 06:55 PM
Surr: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 55.5 0 32-100 %REC 1 2/17/2021 06:55 PM Surr: Decachlorobiphenyl 55.3 0 26-104 %REC 1 2/17/2021 06:55 PM Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out 15 of 30
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism” ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03
Client Sample ID: SS-01@1c
Collection Date: 2/16/2021 8:12:00 AM
Matrix: SOIL
CLIENT: Kleinfelder
Lab Order: N044190
Lab ID: N044190-051
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 18-Feb-21
Analyses Result MDL PQL Qual Units DF Date Analyzed

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

TOTAL METALS BY ICP
EPA 6010B
Analyst: CEI
EPA 3050B
RunID: NV00922-ICP2_210217A QC Batch: 85278 PrepDate: 2/17/2021 Arsenic ND 0.54 1.0 mg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 03:25 PM
Lead 5.8 0.30 1.0 mg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 03:25 PM
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out 16 of 30
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism” ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03
Client Sample ID: SS-02@2d
Collection Date: 2/16/2021 8:43:00 AM
Matrix: SOIL
CLIENT: Kleinfelder
Lab Order: N044190
Lab ID: N044190-052
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 18-Feb-21
Analyses Result MDL PQL Qual Units DF Date Analyzed

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

TOTAL METALS BY ICP
EPA 6010B
Analyst: CEI
EPA 3050B
RunID: NV00922-ICP2_210217A QC Batch: 85278 PrepDate: 2/17/2021 Arsenic ND 0.54 1.0 mg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 03:54 PM
Lead 5.5 0.29 1.0 mg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 03:54 PM
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out 17 of 30
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism” ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03
Client Sample ID: SS-03@3b
Collection Date: 2/16/2021 9:50:00 AM
Matrix: SOIL
CLIENT: Kleinfelder
Lab Order: N044190
Lab ID: N044190-053
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 18-Feb-21
Analyses Result MDL PQL Qual Units DF Date Analyzed

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

TOTAL METALS BY ICP
EPA 6010B
Analyst: CEI
EPA 3050B
RunID: NV00922-ICP2_210217A QC Batch: 85278 PrepDate: 2/17/2021 Arsenic ND 0.54 1.0 mg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 04:10 PM
Lead 6.1 0.29 1.0 mg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 04:10 PM
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out 18 of 30
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism” ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03
Client Sample ID: SS-04@4d
Collection Date: 2/16/2021 9:20:00 AM
Matrix: SOIL
CLIENT: Kleinfelder
Lab Order: N044190
Lab ID: N044190-054
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 18-Feb-21
Analyses Result MDL PQL Qual Units DF Date Analyzed

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

TOTAL METALS BY ICP
EPA 6010B
Analyst: CEI
EPA 3050B
RunID: NV00922-ICP2_210217A QC Batch: 85278 PrepDate: 2/17/2021 Arsenic ND 0.54 1.0 mg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 04:16 PM
Lead 5.8 0.30 1.0 mg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 04:16 PM
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out 19 of 30
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism” ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03
Client Sample ID: SS-05@5a
Collection Date: 2/16/2021 12:05:00 PM
Matrix: SOIL
CLIENT: Kleinfelder
Lab Order: N044190
Lab ID: N044190-055
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 18-Feb-21
Analyses Result MDL PQL Qual Units DF Date Analyzed

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

TOTAL METALS BY ICP
EPA 6010B
Analyst: CEI
EPA 3050B
RunID: NV00922-ICP2_210217A QC Batch: 85278 PrepDate: 2/17/2021 Arsenic ND 0.54 1.0 mg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 04:22 PM
Lead 4.4 0.30 1.0 mg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 04:22 PM
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out 20 of 30
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism” ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03
Client Sample ID: SS-06@6a
Collection Date: 2/16/2021 12:30:00 PM
Matrix: SOIL
CLIENT: Kleinfelder
Lab Order: N044190
Lab ID: N044190-056
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 18-Feb-21
Analyses Result MDL PQL Qual Units DF Date Analyzed

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

TOTAL METALS BY ICP
EPA 6010B
Analyst: CEI
EPA 3050B
RunID: NV00922-ICP2_210217A QC Batch: 85278 PrepDate: 2/17/2021 Arsenic ND 0.54 1.0 mg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 04:28 PM
Lead 6.1 0.29 1.0 mg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 04:28 PM
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out 21 of 30
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism” ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03
Client Sample ID: SS-07@7d
Collection Date: 2/16/2021 1:40:00 PM
Matrix: SOIL
CLIENT: Kleinfelder
Lab Order: N044190
Lab ID: N044190-057
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 18-Feb-21
Analyses Result MDL PQL Qual Units DF Date Analyzed

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

TOTAL METALS BY ICP
EPA 6010B
Analyst: CEI
EPA 3050B
RunID: NV00922-ICP2_210217A QC Batch: 85278 PrepDate: 2/17/2021 Arsenic ND 0.54 1.0 mg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 04:34 PM
Lead 5.6 0.29 1.0 mg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 04:34 PM
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out 22 of 30
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism” ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03
Client Sample ID: SS-07 duplicate@7d
Collection Date: 2/16/2021 1:45:00 PM
Matrix: SOIL
CLIENT: Kleinfelder
Lab Order: N044190
Lab ID: N044190-058
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 18-Feb-21
Analyses Result MDL PQL Qual Units DF Date Analyzed

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

TOTAL METALS BY ICP
EPA 6010B
Analyst: CEI
EPA 3050B
RunID: NV00922-ICP2_210217A QC Batch: 85278 PrepDate: 2/17/2021 Arsenic ND 0.54 1.0 mg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 04:40 PM
Lead 5.6 0.30 1.0 mg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 04:40 PM
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out 23 of 30
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism” ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03
Client Sample ID: SS-08@8b
Collection Date: 2/16/2021 1:00:00 PM
Matrix: SOIL
CLIENT: Kleinfelder
Lab Order: N044190
Lab ID: N044190-059
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 18-Feb-21
Analyses Result MDL PQL Qual Units DF Date Analyzed

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

TOTAL METALS BY ICP
EPA 6010B
Analyst: CEI
EPA 3050B
RunID: NV00922-ICP2_210217A QC Batch: 85278 PrepDate: 2/17/2021 Arsenic ND 0.54 1.0 mg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 04:46 PM
Lead 5.6 0.29 1.0 mg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 04:46 PM
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out 24 of 30
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism” ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03
Client Sample ID: SS-09@9c
Collection Date: 2/16/2021 3:00:00 PM
Matrix: SOIL
CLIENT: Kleinfelder
Lab Order: N044190
Lab ID: N044190-060
ASSET Laboratories Print Date: 18-Feb-21
Analyses Result MDL PQL Qual Units DF Date Analyzed

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

TOTAL METALS BY ICP
EPA 6010B
Analyst: CEI
EPA 3050B
RunID: NV00922-ICP2_210217A QC Batch: 85278 PrepDate: 2/17/2021 Arsenic ND 0.54 1.0 mg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 04:52 PM
Lead 7.4 0.30 1.0 mg/Kg 1 2/17/2021 04:52 PM
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference Results are wet unless otherwise specified DO Surrogate Diluted Out 25 of 30
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism” ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
ASSET L Date: 18-Feb-21 aboratories
Project: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03
CLIENT: Kleinfelder
Work Order: N044190

ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT
TestCode: 6010_S
Sample ID: MB-85278
Batch ID: 85278 TestNo: EPA 6010B Analysis Date: 2/17/2021 Prep Date: 2/17/2021
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPDLimit Qual Units: mg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: PBS
RunNo: 150787
SeqNo: 4109732
SampType: MBLK TestCode: 6010_S
EPA 3050B
Arsenic ND 1.0
Lead ND 1.0
Sample ID: LCS-85278
Batch ID: 85278 TestNo: EPA 6010B Analysis Date: 2/17/2021 Prep Date: 2/17/2021
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPDLimit Qual Units: mg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: LCSS
RunNo: 150787
SeqNo: 4109733
SampType: LCS TestCode: 6010_S
EPA 3050B
Arsenic 24.689 1.0 25.00 0 98.8 80 120
Lead 24.862 1.0 25.00 0 99.4 80 120
Sample ID: N044190-051A-MS
Batch ID: 85278 TestNo: EPA 6010B Analysis Date: 2/17/2021 Prep Date: 2/17/2021
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPDLimit Qual Units: mg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: ZZZZZZ
RunNo: 150787
SeqNo: 4109739
SampType: MS TestCode: 6010_S
EPA 3050B
Arsenic 20.524 1.0 24.95 0 82.3 75 125
Lead 28.025 1.0 24.95 5.759 89.2 75 125
Sample ID: N044190-051A-MSD
Batch ID: 85278 TestNo: EPA 6010B Analysis Date: 2/17/2021 Prep Date: 2/17/2021
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPDLimit Qual Units: mg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: ZZZZZZ
RunNo: 150787
SeqNo: 4109740
SampType: MSD TestCode: 6010_S
EPA 3050B
Arsenic 20.936 1.0 24.99 0 83.8 75 125 20.52 1.99 20
Lead 28.099 1.0 24.99 5.759 89.4 75 125 28.03 0.263 20
Qualifiers:

B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference DO Surrogate Diluted Out Calculations are based on raw values 26 of 30
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism” ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03
CLIENT: Kleinfelder
Work Order: N044190

ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT
TestCode: 8081SOIL_M
Sample ID: LCS-85282
Batch ID: 85282 TestNo: EPA 8081A Analysis Date: 2/17/2021 Prep Date: 2/17/2021
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPDLimit Qual Units: µg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: LCSS
RunNo: 150789
SeqNo: 4109834
SampType: LCS TestCode: 8081SOIL_M
EPA 3546
4,4´-DDD 14.537 2.0 16.67 0 87.2 35 117
4,4´-DDE 13.668 2.0 16.67 0 82.0 44 118
4,4´-DDT 12.995 2.0 16.67 0 78.0 37 114
Aldrin 12.940 1.0 16.67 0 77.6 35 128
alpha-BHC 13.457 1.0 16.67 0 80.7 38 123
alpha-Chlordane 13.052 1.0 16.67 0 78.3 39 118
beta-BHC 11.995 1.0 16.67 0 72.0 34 109
delta-BHC 13.075 1.0 16.67 0 78.4 40 107
Dieldrin 14.103 2.0 16.67 0 84.6 39 129
Endosulfan I 13.233 1.0 16.67 0 79.4 39 118
Endosulfan II 13.890 2.0 16.67 0 83.3 34 139
Endosulfan sulfate 15.410 2.0 16.67 0 92.4 49 114
Endrin 15.153 2.0 16.67 0 90.9 47 130
Endrin aldehyde 13.730 2.0 16.67 0 82.4 42 116
Endrin ketone 16.018 2.0 16.67 0 96.1 43 114
gamma-BHC 13.625 1.0 16.67 0 81.7 35 124
gamma-Chlordane 13.315 1.0 16.67 0 79.9 33 117
Heptachlor 13.233 1.0 16.67 0 79.4 44 126
Heptachlor epoxide 12.807 1.0 16.67 0 76.8 37 118
Methoxychlor 14.528 8.5 16.67 0 87.2 49 121
Surr: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 11.668 16.67 70.0 32 100
Surr: Decachlorobiphenyl 13.297 16.67 79.8 26 104
Sample ID: MB-85282
Batch ID: 85282 TestNo: EPA 8081A Analysis Date: 2/17/2021 Prep Date: 2/17/2021
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPDLimit Qual Units: µg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: PBS
RunNo: 150789
SeqNo: 4109835
SampType: MBLK TestCode: 8081SOIL_M
EPA 3546
4,4´-DDD ND 2.0
4,4´-DDE ND 2.0
4,4´-DDT ND 2.0
Qualifiers:

B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference DO Surrogate Diluted Out Calculations are based on raw values 27 of 30
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism” ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03
CLIENT: Kleinfelder
Work Order: N044190

ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT
TestCode: 8081SOIL_M
Sample ID: MB-85282
Batch ID: 85282 TestNo: EPA 8081A Analysis Date: 2/17/2021 Prep Date: 2/17/2021
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPDLimit Qual Units: µg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: PBS
RunNo: 150789
SeqNo: 4109835
SampType: MBLK TestCode: 8081SOIL_M
EPA 3546
Aldrin ND 1.0
alpha-BHC ND 1.0
alpha-Chlordane ND 1.0
beta-BHC ND 1.0
Chlordane ND 8.5
delta-BHC ND 1.0
Dieldrin ND 2.0
Endosulfan I ND 1.0
Endosulfan II ND 2.0
Endosulfan sulfate ND 2.0
Endrin ND 2.0
Endrin aldehyde ND 2.0
Endrin ketone ND 2.0
gamma-BHC ND 1.0
gamma-Chlordane ND 1.0
Heptachlor ND 1.0
Heptachlor epoxide ND 1.0
Methoxychlor ND 8.5
Toxaphene ND 85
Surr: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 11.177 16.67 67.0 32 100
Surr: Decachlorobiphenyl 12.612 16.67 75.7 26 104
Sample ID: N044190-005A-MS
Batch ID: 85282 TestNo: EPA 8081A Analysis Date: 2/17/2021 Prep Date: 2/17/2021
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPDLimit Qual Units: µg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: ZZZZZZ
RunNo: 150789
SeqNo: 4109847
SampType: MS TestCode: 8081SOIL_M
EPA 3546
4,4´-DDD 11.275 2.0 16.63 0 67.8 33 104
4,4´-DDE 9.096 2.0 16.63 0 54.7 27 104
4,4´-DDT 3.537 2.0 16.63 0 21.3 16 103
Aldrin 8.512 1.0 16.63 0 51.2 27 101
Qualifiers:

B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference DO Surrogate Diluted Out Calculations are based on raw values 28 of 30
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism” ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03
CLIENT: Kleinfelder
Work Order: N044190

ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT
TestCode: 8081SOIL_M
Sample ID: N044190-005A-MS
Batch ID: 85282 TestNo: EPA 8081A Analysis Date: 2/17/2021 Prep Date: 2/17/2021
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPDLimit Qual Units: µg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: ZZZZZZ
RunNo: 150789
SeqNo: 4109847
SampType: MS TestCode: 8081SOIL_M
EPA 3546
alpha-BHC 8.928 1.0 16.63 0 53.7 30 100
alpha-Chlordane 8.504 1.0 16.63 0 51.1 32 100
beta-BHC 8.170 1.0 16.63 0 49.1 24 100
delta-BHC 8.871 1.0 16.63 0 53.4 32 100
Dieldrin 9.234 2.0 16.63 0 55.5 30 100
Endosulfan I 8.529 1.0 16.63 0 51.3 26 100
Endosulfan II 8.936 2.0 16.63 0 53.7 26 100
Endosulfan sulfate 9.663 2.0 16.63 0 58.1 26 100
Endrin 9.771 2.0 16.63 0 58.8 37 102
Endrin aldehyde 7.779 2.0 16.63 0 46.8 15 100
Endrin ketone 8.399 2.0 16.63 0 50.5 19 100
gamma-BHC 8.890 1.0 16.63 0 53.5 30 100
gamma-Chlordane 8.946 1.0 16.63 0 53.8 24 102
Heptachlor 7.743 1.0 16.63 0 46.6 30 106
Heptachlor epoxide 8.559 1.0 16.63 0 51.5 28 100
Methoxychlor 5.623 8.5 16.63 0 33.8 21 122 J
Surr: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 8.037 16.63 48.3 32 100
Surr: Decachlorobiphenyl 8.684 16.63 52.2 26 104
Sample ID: N044190-005A-MSD
Batch ID: 85282 TestNo: EPA 8081A Analysis Date: 2/17/2021 Prep Date: 2/17/2021
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPDLimit Qual Units: µg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: ZZZZZZ
RunNo: 150789
SeqNo: 4109848
SampType: MSD TestCode: 8081SOIL_M
EPA 3546
4,4´-DDD 10.603 2.0 16.65 0 63.7 33 104 11.27 6.15 20
4,4´-DDE 8.783 2.0 16.65 0 52.8 27 104 9.096 3.50 20
4,4´-DDT 4.897 2.0 16.65 0 29.4 16 103 3.537 32.2 20 R
Aldrin 8.261 1.0 16.65 0 49.6 27 101 8.512 3.00 20
alpha-BHC 8.407 1.0 16.65 0 50.5 30 100 8.928 6.01 20
alpha-Chlordane 8.319 1.0 16.65 0 50.0 32 100 8.504 2.20 20 beta-BHC 7.818 1.0 16.65 0 47.0 24 100 8.170 4.40 20
Qualifiers:

B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference DO Surrogate Diluted Out Calculations are based on raw values 29 of 30
NEVADA|P:702.307.2659 F:702.307.2691
3151 W. Post Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89118
ELAP Cert 2676 | NV Cert NV00922
“Serving Clients with Passion and Professionalism” ORELAP/NELAP Cert 4046 CALIFORNIA|P:562.219.7435 F:562.219.7436
11110 Artesia Blvd., Ste B, Cerritos, CA 90703
ELAP Cert 2921
EPA ID CA01638
Project: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03
CLIENT: Kleinfelder
Work Order: N044190

ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT
TestCode: 8081SOIL_M
Sample ID: N044190-005A-MSD
Batch ID: 85282 TestNo: EPA 8081A Analysis Date: 2/17/2021 Prep Date: 2/17/2021
Analyte Result SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPDLimit Qual Units: µg/Kg
PQL
Client ID: ZZZZZZ
RunNo: 150789
SeqNo: 4109848
SampType: MSD TestCode: 8081SOIL_M
EPA 3546
delta-BHC 8.499 1.0 16.65 0 51.0 32 100 8.871 4.29 20
Dieldrin 8.648 2.0 16.65 0 51.9 30 100 9.234 6.55 20
Endosulfan I 8.620 1.0 16.65 0 51.8 26 100 8.529 1.06 20 Endosulfan II 8.830 2.0 16.65 0 53.0 26 100 8.936 1.20 20 Endosulfan sulfate 9.033 2.0 16.65 0 54.3 26 100 9.663 6.74 20 Endrin 9.516 2.0 16.65 0 57.2 37 102 9.771 2.64 20
Endrin aldehyde 6.901 2.0 16.65 0 41.5 15 100 7.779 12.0 20 Endrin ketone 8.021 2.0 16.65 0 48.2 19 100 8.399 4.61 20 gamma-BHC 8.555 1.0 16.65 0 51.4 30 100 8.890 3.83 20
gamma-Chlordane 8.695 1.0 16.65 0 52.2 24 102 8.946 2.85 20 Heptachlor 7.425 1.0 16.65 0 44.6 30 106 7.743 4.19 20
Heptachlor epoxide 8.069 1.0 16.65 0 48.5 28 100 8.559 5.89 20 Methoxychlor 6.268 8.5 16.65 0 37.7 21 122 5.623 0 20 J Surr: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 8.009 16.65 48.1 32 100 0
Surr: Decachlorobiphenyl 8.474 16.65 50.9 26 104 0
Qualifiers:

B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Reporting Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits S Spike/Surrogate outside of limits due to matrix interference DO Surrogate Diluted Out Calculations are based on raw values 30 of 30
N044190-01
-02
-03
-04
-06
-07
-08
-09
N044190-11
-12
-13
-14
-16
-17
-18
-19
N044190-21
-22
-23
-24
-26
-27
-28
-29
N044190-31
-32
-33
-34
-36
-37
-38
-39
N044190-41
-42
-43
-44
-46
-47
-48
-49
N044190-51
-52
-53
-54
-55
-56
-57
-58
-59
-60
ASSET Laboratories
Please review the checklist below. Any NO signifies non-compliance. Any non-compliance will be noted and must be understood as having an impact on the quality of the data. All tests will be performed as requested regardless of any compliance issues.

If you have any questions or further instruction, please contact our Project Coordinator at (702) 307-2659.

Carrier name: ASSET
Cooler Received/Opened On: 2/17/2021
Rep sample Temp (Deg C): 3.8/4.1 IR Gun ID: 2
Temp Blank: Yes No
Last 4 digits of Tracking No.: NA
Cooling process: Ice Ice Pack Dry Ice Other None
Packing Material Used: None
Workorder: N044190
Sample Receipt Checklist

4. Chain of custody present? Yes No

6. Chain of custody signed when relinquished and received? Yes No

7. Chain of custody agrees with sample labels? Yes No

8. Samples in proper container/bottle? Yes No

9. Sample containers intact? Yes No

10. Sufficient sample volume for indicated test? Yes No

11. All samples received within holding time? Yes No

13. Water - VOA vials have zero headspace? Yes No NA

14. Water - pH acceptable upon receipt? Yes No NA
Example: pH > 12 for (CN,S); pH<2 for Metals

1. Shipping container/cooler in good condition? Yes No Not Present

2. Custody seals intact, signed, dated on shippping container/cooler? Yes No Not Present

3. Custody seals intact on sample bottles? Yes No Not Present

5. Sampler's name present in COC? Yes No

12. Temperature of rep sample or Temp Blank within acceptable limit? Yes No NA

15. Did the bottle labels indicate correct preservatives used? Yes No NA

16. Were there Non-Conformance issues at login? Yes No NA Was Client notified? Yes No NA
Comments:

Checklist Completed By: BHN Reviewed By:
02/17/2021
Sample ID Client Sample ID Date Collected
Date Received:

Date Due Matrix Test No
WORK ORDER Summary 17-Feb-21
WorkOrder: N044190
Comments:

Client ID: KLEFE02
Project: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03 QC Level: RTNE Hld MS Sub
2/16/2021
Test Name
ASSET Laboratories
Storage
N044190-001A SS-1a 2/16/2021 8:05:00 AM Soil WS
N044190-002A SS-1b 2/16/2021 8:15:00 AM WS
N044190-003A SS-1c 2/16/2021 8:10:00 AM WS
N044190-004A SS-1d 2/16/2021 8:20:00 AM WS
N044190-005A SS-1 COMPOSITE 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 EPA 3546 Microwave Extraction YG 2/18/2021 EPA 8081A ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES BY
GC/ECD
YG
N044190-006A SS-2a 2/16/2021 8:30:00 AM WS
N044190-007A SS-2b 2/16/2021 8:35:00 AM WS
N044190-008A SS-2c 2/16/2021 8:50:00 AM WS
N044190-009A SS-2d 2/16/2021 8:40:00 AM WS
N044190-010A SS-2 COMPOSITE 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 EPA 3546 Microwave Extraction YG 2/18/2021 EPA 8081A ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES BY
GC/ECD
YG
N044190-011A SS-3a 2/16/2021 9:55:00 AM WS
N044190-012A SS-3b 2/16/2021 9:45:00 AM WS
N044190-013A SS-3c 2/16/2021 10:00:00 AM WS
N044190-014A SS-3d 2/16/2021 9:40:00 AM WS
N044190-015A SS-3 COMPOSITE 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 EPA 3546 Microwave Extraction YG 2/18/2021 EPA 8081A ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES BY
GC/ECD
YG
N044190-016A SS-4a 2/16/2021 9:00:00 AM WS
N044190-017A SS-4b 2/16/2021 9:07:00 AM WS
N044190-018A SS-4c 2/16/2021 9:25:00 AM WS

Page 1 of 4 ends

Sample ID Client Sample ID Date Collected
Date Received:

Date Due Matrix Test No
WORK ORDER Summary 17-Feb-21
WorkOrder: N044190
Comments:

Client ID: KLEFE02
Project: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03 QC Level: RTNE Hld MS Sub
2/16/2021
Test Name
ASSET Laboratories
Storage
N044190-019A SS-4d 2/16/2021 9:15:00 AM Soil WS
N044190-020A SS-4 COMPOSITE 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 EPA 3546 Microwave Extraction YG 2/18/2021 EPA 8081A ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES BY
GC/ECD
YG
N044190-021A SS-5a 2/16/2021 12:00:00 PM WS
N044190-022A SS-5b 2/16/2021 12:20:00 PM WS
N044190-023A SS-5c 2/16/2021 12:10:00 PM WS
N044190-024A SS-5d 2/16/2021 12:15:00 PM WS
N044190-025A SS-5 COMPOSITE 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 EPA 3546 Microwave Extraction YG 2/18/2021 EPA 8081A ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES BY
GC/ECD
YG
N044190-026A SS-6a 2/16/2021 12:25:00 PM WS
N044190-027A SS-6b 2/16/2021 12:35:00 PM WS
N044190-028A SS-6c 2/16/2021 12:45:00 PM WS
N044190-029A SS-6d 2/16/2021 12:40:00 PM WS
N044190-030A SS-6 COMPOSITE 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 EPA 3546 Microwave Extraction YG 2/18/2021 EPA 8081A ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES BY
GC/ECD
YG
N044190-031A SS-7a 2/16/2021 2:10:00 PM WS
N044190-032A SS-7b 2/16/2021 1:55:00 PM WS
N044190-033A SS-7c 2/16/2021 2:25:00 PM WS
N044190-034A SS-7d 2/16/2021 1:30:00 PM WS
N044190-035A SS-7 COMPOSITE 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 EPA 3546 Microwave Extraction YG 2/18/2021 EPA 8081A ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES BY
GC/ECD
YG

Page 2 of 4 ends

Sample ID Client Sample ID Date Collected
Date Received:

Date Due Matrix Test No
WORK ORDER Summary 17-Feb-21
WorkOrder: N044190
Comments:

Client ID: KLEFE02
Project: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03 QC Level: RTNE Hld MS Sub
2/16/2021
Test Name
ASSET Laboratories
Storage
N044190-036A SS-7a duplicate 2/16/2021 2:15:00 PM Soil WS N044190-037A SS-7b duplicate 2/16/2021 2:00:00 PM WS
N044190-038A SS-7c duplicate 2/16/2021 2:30:00 PM WS
N044190-039A SS-7d duplicate 2/16/2021 1:35:00 PM WS
N044190-040A SS-7 duplicate COMPOSITE 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 EPA 3546 Microwave Extraction YG 2/18/2021 EPA 8081A ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES BY
GC/ECD
YG
N044190-041A SS-8a 2/16/2021 12:50:00 PM WS
N044190-042A SS-8b 2/16/2021 12:55:00 PM WS
N044190-043A SS-8c 2/16/2021 1:10:00 PM WS
N044190-044A SS-8d 2/16/2021 1:05:00 PM WS
N044190-045A SS-8 COMPOSITE 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 EPA 3546 Microwave Extraction YG 2/18/2021 EPA 8081A ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES BY
GC/ECD
YG
N044190-046A SS-9a 2/16/2021 2:40:00 PM WS
N044190-047A SS-9b 2/16/2021 2:45:00 PM WS
N044190-048A SS-9c 2/16/2021 2:55:00 PM WS
N044190-049A SS-9d 2/16/2021 3:05:00 PM WS
N044190-050A SS-9 COMPOSITE 2/16/2021 2/18/2021 EPA 3546 Microwave Extraction YG 2/18/2021 EPA 8081A ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES BY
GC/ECD
YG
N044190-051A SS-01@1c 2/16/2021 8:12:00 AM 2/18/2021 EPA 3050B SOPREP TOTAL METALS CEI 2/18/2021 EPA 6010B TOTAL METALS BY ICP CEI
N044190-052A SS-02@2d 2/16/2021 8:43:00 AM 2/18/2021 EPA 3050B SOPREP TOTAL METALS CEI

Page 3 of 4 ends

Sample ID Client Sample ID Date Collected
Date Received:

Date Due Matrix Test No
WORK ORDER Summary 17-Feb-21
WorkOrder: N044190
Comments:

Client ID: KLEFE02
Project: Fresno Phase II, 20212901.001A Task 03 QC Level: RTNE Hld MS Sub
2/16/2021
Test Name
ASSET Laboratories
Storage
N044190-052A SS-02@2d 2/16/2021 8:43:00 AM 2/18/2021 Soil EPA 6010B TOTAL METALS BY ICP CEI N044190-053A SS-03@3b 2/16/2021 9:50:00 AM 2/18/2021 EPA 3050B SOPREP TOTAL METALS CEI 2/18/2021 EPA 6010B TOTAL METALS BY ICP CEI
N044190-054A SS-04@4d 2/16/2021 9:20:00 AM 2/18/2021 EPA 3050B SOPREP TOTAL METALS CEI 2/18/2021 EPA 6010B TOTAL METALS BY ICP CEI
N044190-055A SS-05@5a 2/16/2021 12:05:00 PM 2/18/2021 EPA 3050B SOPREP TOTAL METALS CEI 2/18/2021 EPA 6010B TOTAL METALS BY ICP CEI
N044190-056A SS-06@6a 2/16/2021 12:30:00 PM 2/18/2021 EPA 3050B SOPREP TOTAL METALS CEI 2/18/2021 EPA 6010B TOTAL METALS BY ICP CEI
N044190-057A SS-07@7d 2/16/2021 1:40:00 PM 2/18/2021 EPA 3050B SOPREP TOTAL METALS CEI 2/18/2021 EPA 6010B TOTAL METALS BY ICP CEI
N044190-058A SS-07 duplicate@7d 2/16/2021 1:45:00 PM 2/18/2021 EPA 3050B SOPREP TOTAL METALS CEI 2/18/2021 EPA 6010B TOTAL METALS BY ICP CEI
N044190-059A SS-08@8b 2/16/2021 1:00:00 PM 2/18/2021 EPA 3050B SOPREP TOTAL METALS CEI 2/18/2021 EPA 6010B TOTAL METALS BY ICP CEI
N044190-060A SS-09@9c 2/16/2021 3:00:00 PM 2/18/2021 EPA 3050B SOPREP TOTAL METALS CEI 2/18/2021 EPA 6010B TOTAL METALS BY ICP CEI
N044190-061A FOLDER 2/18/2021 2/18/2021 Folder Folder LAB 2/18/2021 Folder Folder LAB

Page 4 of 4 ends

Appendix H
Noise Calculations

Existing Traffic Noise
Project:

Noise Level Descriptor: Ldn
Site Conditions: Hard
Traffic Input: ADT
Traffic K-Factor:

Ldn,
Number Name From To (mph) Near Far % Auto % Medium % Heavy % Day % Eve % Night (dBA)5,6,7 75 dBA 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 1 Riverside Dr (Between Spruce Ave and the northernmost project driveway) 2,050 35 50 50 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0% 57.0 2 Riverside Dr (Between the northernmost project driveway and Fir Avenue) 2,060 40 50 50 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0% 58.6 3 Riverside Dr (Between Fir Avenue and the southernmost project driveway) 2,270 40 50 50 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0% 59.0 4 Riverside Dr (Between the southernmost project driveway and Herndon Ave) 2,260 40 50 50 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0% 59.0 5 Herndon Ave (west of Riverside Drive) 24,880 45 50 50 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0% 70.8 6 Herndon Ave (Between Riverside Dr and Arthur Ave) 21,050 50 50 50 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0% 71.4 7 Herndon Ave (East of Arthur Ave) 21,050 50 50 50 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0% 71.4 8 ADT Limit to Comply with General Plan Exterior Noise Standard 9,000 40 50 50 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0% 65.0 35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%
35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%
35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%
35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%
35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%
35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%
35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%
35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%
35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%
35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%
35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%
35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%
*All modeling assumes average pavement, level roadways (less than 1.5% grade), constant traffic flow and does not account for shielding of any type or finite roadway adjustments. All levels are reported as A-weighted noise levels. 2 8
221 698
12 39
Segment Description and Location
ADT
4 12
1 11
1 4
1 1 25
22 70
Input
Speed Traffic Distribution Characteristics
Output
Distance to
Directional
Centerline, (feet)4
4 221
36 Distance to Contour, (feet)3
698
5 16 49 156
39 19 61 191 605
22 70
Existing-Plus-Project Traffic Noise
Project:

Noise Level Descriptor: Ldn
Site Conditions: Hard
Traffic Input: ADT
Traffic K-Factor:

Ldn,
Number Name From To (mph) Near Far % Auto % Medium % Heavy % Day % Eve % Night (dBA)5,6,7 75 dBA 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 1 Riverside Dr (Between Spruce Ave and the northernmost project driveway) 5,536 35 50 50 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0% 61.3 2 Riverside Dr (Between the northernmost project driveway and Fir Avenue) 7,783 40 50 50 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0% 64.3 3 Riverside Dr (Between Fir Avenue and the southernmost project driveway) 19,500 40 50 50 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0% 68.3 4 Riverside Dr (Between the southernmost project driveway and Herndon Ave) 20,603 40 50 50 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0% 68.6 5 Herndon Ave (west of Riverside Drive) 37,158 45 50 50 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0% 72.6 6 Herndon Ave (Between Riverside Dr and Arthur Ave) 26,352 50 50 50 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0% 72.4 7 Herndon Ave (East of Arthur Ave) 26,321 50 50 50 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0% 72.4 35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%
35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%
35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%
35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%
35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%
35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%
35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%
35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%
35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%
35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%
35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%
35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%
35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%
*All modeling assumes average pavement, level roadways (less than 1.5% grade), constant traffic flow and does not account for shielding of any type or finite roadway adjustments. All levels are reported as A-weighted noise levels.

Input Output
ADT
Speed
Distance to
Directional
Centerline, (feet) Segment Description and Location 4 Traffic Distribution Characteristics Distance to Contour, (feet)3 2 7 21 67
11 36 113 358
29 90 286 904
4 14 43 135
11 34 107 339
28 87 276 873
28 87 276 872
Traffic Noise Spreadsheet Calculator
Project:

Noise Level Descriptor: Ldn
Site Conditions: Hard
Traffic Input: ADT
Traffic K-Factor:

Ldn,
Number Name From To (mph) Near Far % Auto % Medium % Heavy % Day % Eve % Night (dBA)5,6,7 75 dBA 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA Existing Conditions
1 Riverside Dr (Between Spruce Ave and Entry B) 6,124 35 50 50 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0% 61.7 2 Riverside Dr (Between Entry B and Entry C) 9,483 40 50 50 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0% 65.2 3 Riverside Dr (Between Entry C and Entry D) 23,459 40 50 50 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0% 69.1 4 Riverside Dr (Between Entry D and Herndon Ave) 25,128 40 50 50 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0% 69.4 5 Herndon Ave (west of Riverside Drive) 37,169 45 50 50 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0% 72.6 6 Herndon Ave (Between Riverside Dr and Arthur Ave) 26,332 50 50 50 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0% 72.4 7 Herndon Ave (East of Arthur Ave) 26,332 50 50 50 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0% 72.4 35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%
35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%
35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%
35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%
35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%
35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%
35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%
35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%
35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%
35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%
35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%
35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%
35 100 100 97.0% 2.0% 1.0% 80.0% 15.0% 5.0%
*All modeling assumes average pavement, level roadways (less than 1.5% grade), constant traffic flow and does not account for shielding of any type or finite roadway adjustments. All levels are reported as A-weighted noise levels.

Input Output
ADT
Speed
Distance to
Directional
Centerline, (feet) Segment Description and Location 4 Traffic Distribution Characteristics Distance to Contour, (feet)3 2 7 23 74
14 44 138 437
29 90 286 904
5 16 52 165
13 41 129 408
28 87 276 873
28 87 276 873
Citation # Citations
1 Caltrans Technical Noise Supplement. 2009 (November). Table (5-11), Pg 5-60. Caltrans Technical Noise Supplement. 2013 (September). Table (4-2), Pg 4-17. 2 Caltrans Technical Noise Supplement. 2009 (November). Equation (5-26), Pg 5-60. Caltrans Technical Noise Supplement. 2013 (September). Equation (4-5), Pg 4-17 3 Caltrans Technical Noise Supplement. 2009 (November). Equation (2-16), Pg 2-32. FHWA 2004 TNM Version 2.5 4 Caltrans Technical Noise Supplement. 2009 (November). Equation (5-11), Pg 5-47, 48. FHWA 2004 TNM Version 2.5 5 Caltrans Technical Noise Supplement. 2009 (November). Equation (2-26), Pg 2-55, 56. Caltrans Technical Noise Supplement. 2013 (September). Equation (2-23), Pg 2-5 6 Caltrans Technical Noise Supplement. 2009 (November). Equation (2-27), Pg 2-57. Caltrans Technical Noise Supplement. 2013 (September). Equation (2-24), Pg 2-5 7 Caltrans Technical Noise Supplement. 2009 (November). Pg 2-53. Caltrans Technical Noise Supplement. 2013 (September). Pg 2-57. 8 Caltrans Technical Noise Supplement. 2009 (November). Equation (5-7), Pg 5-45. FHWA 2004 TNM Version 2.5 9 Caltrans Technical Noise Supplement. 2009 (November). Equation (5-8), Pg 5-45. FHWA 2004 TNM Version 2.5 10 Caltrans Technical Noise Supplement. 2009 (November). Equation (5-9), Pg 5-45. FHWA 2004 TNM Version 2.5 11 Caltrans Technical Noise Supplement. 2009 (November). Equation (5-13), Pg 5-49. FHWA 2004 TNM Version 2.5 12 Caltrans Technical Noise Supplement. 2009 (November). Equation (5-14), Pg 5-49. FHWA 2004 TNM Version 2.5 13 Federal Highway Administration Traffic Noise Model Technical Manual. Report No. FHWA-PD-96-010. 1998 (January). Equation (16), Pg 67 14 Federal Highway Administration Traffic Noise Model Technical Manual. Report No. FHWA-PD-96-010. 1998 (January). Equation (20), Pg 69 15 Federal Highway Administration Traffic Noise Model Technical Manual. Report No. FHWA-PD-96-010. 1998 (January). Equation (18), Pg 69 References
California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). 2009 (November). Technical Noise Supplement. Available: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/env/noise/pub/tens_complete.pdf. Accessed A 2017.

Fresno Costco Onsite Construction Noise
Location
Distance to Nearest
Receptor in feet Equipment
Usage
Factor1
Threshold 1,193 Paver 0.2
50 Grader 0.4
Single-Family Residence
(West Parr Avenue west of
project site) 90
Roller

0.2 Rio Vista Middle School 850 Scraper 0.4
River Bluff Elementary
School 1230
Ground Type hard
Source Height 8
Receiver Height 5
Ground Factor2 0.00
Predicted Noise Level 3
Paver 78.0
Grader 81.0
Roller 78.0
Scraper 81.0
88 Sources:
1 Obtained from the FHWA Roadway Construction Noise Model, January 2006. Table 1. 2 Based on Figure 6-5 from the Federal Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment, 2006 (pg 6-23). 3 Based on the following from the Federal Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment, 2006 (pg 12-3).

Leq(equip) = E.L.+10*log (U.F.) - 20*log (D/50) - 10*G*log (D/50) Where: E.L. = Emission Level;
U.F.= Usage Factor;
G = Constant that accounts for topography and ground effects (FTA 2006: pg 6-23); and D = Distance from source to receiver.

87.6 85
Combined Predicted
Noise Level (Leq dBA)
Reference Emission
Noise Levels (Lmax) at 50
feet1

60.0 85

82.4 85

62.9 85

59.7 Leq dBA at 50 feet3
Combined Predicted Noise Level (Leq dBA at 50 feet)
Fresno Costco Offsite Construction Noise
Location
Distance to Nearest
Receptor in feet Equipment
Usage
Factor1
Threshold 974 Paver 0.2
50 Grader 0.4
Nearest Residence 90
Off-site improvements
corresponding with
infrastructure improvment
1 in PD 60
Off-site improvements
corresponding with
infrastructure improvment
3 in PD 1000
Off-site improvements
corresponding with
infrastructure improvment
5 in PD 80
Ground Type hard
Source Height 8
Receiver Height 5
Ground Factor2 0.00
Predicted Noise Level 3
Paver 78.0
Grader 81.0

86 Sources:
1 Obtained from the FHWA Roadway Construction Noise Model, January 2006. Table 1. 2 Based on Figure 6-5 from the Federal Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment, 2006 (pg 6-23). 3 Based on the following from the Federal Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment, 2006 (pg 12-3).

Leq dBA at 50 feet3
Combined Predicted Noise Level (Leq dBA at 50 feet)

59.8 81.7

80.7 84.2
Combined Predicted
Noise Level (Leq dBA)
Reference Emission
Noise Levels (Lmax) at 50
feet1

60.0 85

85.8 85
Equipment Description
Acoustical
Usage
Factor (%)
Spec
721.560
Lmax @
50ft (dBA
slow)
Actual
Measured
Lmax @
50ft
(dBA slow)
No. of
Actual Data
Samples
(count)
Spec
721.560
LmaxCalc
Spec
721.560
Leq
Distance
Actual
Measured
LmaxCalc
Actual
Measured
Leq
Auger Drill Rig 20 85 84 36 79.0 72.0 100 78.0 71.0
Backhoe 40 80 78 372 74.0 70.0 100 72.0 68.0
Bar Bender 20 80 na 0 74.0 67.0 100
Blasting na 94 na 0 88.0 100
Boring Jack Power Unit 50 80 83 1 74.0 71.0 100 77.0 74.0 Chain Saw 20 85 84 46 79.0 72.0 100 78.0 71.0
Clam Shovel (dropping) 20 93 87 4 87.0 80.0 100 81.0 74.0 Compactor (ground) 20 80 83 57 74.0 67.0 100 77.0 70.0
Compressor (air) 40 80 78 18 74.0 70.0 100 72.0 68.0
Concrete Batch Plant 15 83 na 0 77.0 68.7 100
Concrete Mixer Truck 40 85 79 40 79.0 75.0 100 73.0 69.0 Concrete Pump Truck 20 82 81 30 76.0 69.0 100 75.0 68.0 Concrete Saw 20 90 90 55 84.0 77.0 100 84.0 77.0
Crane 16 85 81 405 79.0 71.0 100 75.0 67.0
Dozer 40 85 82 55 79.0 75.0 100 76.0 72.0
Drill Rig Truck 20 84 79 22 78.0 71.0 100 73.0 66.0
Drum Mixer 50 80 80 1 74.0 71.0 100 74.0 71.0
Dump Truck 40 84 76 31 78.0 74.0 100 70.0 66.0
Excavator 40 85 81 170 79.0 75.0 100 75.0 71.0
Flat Bed Truck 40 84 74 4 78.0 74.0 100 68.0 64.0
Front End Loader 40 80 79 96 74.0 70.0 100 73.0 69.0
Generator 50 82 81 19 76.0 73.0 100 75.0 72.0
Generator (<25KVA, VMS signs) 50 70 73 74 64.0 61.0 100 67.0 64.0 Gradall 40 85 83 70 79.0 75.0 100 77.0 73.0
Grader 40 85 na 0 79.0 75.0 100
Grapple (on Backhoe) 40 85 87 1 79.0 75.0 100 81.0 77.0 Horizontal Boring Hydr. Jack 25 80 82 6 74.0 68.0 100 76.0 70.0 Hydra Break Ram 10 90 na 0 84.0 74.0 100
Impact Pile Driver 20 95 101 11 89.0 82.0 100 95.0 88.0 Jackhammer 20 85 89 133 79.0 72.0 100 83.0 76.0
Man Lift 20 85 75 23 79.0 72.0 100 69.0 62.0
Mounted Impact Hammer (hoe ram) 20 90 90 212 84.0 77.0 100 84.0 77.0 Pavement Scarafier 20 85 90 2 79.0 72.0 100 84.0 77.0
Paver 50 85 77 9 79.0 76.0 100 71.0 68.0
Pickup Truck 40 55 75 1 49.0 45.0 100 69.0 65.0
Pneumatic Tools 50 85 85 90 79.0 76.0 100 79.0 76.0
Pumps 50 77 81 17 71.0 68.0 100 75.0 72.0
Refrigerator Unit 100 82 73 3 76.0 76.0 100 67.0 67.0
Rivit Buster/chipping gun 20 85 79 19 79.0 72.0 100 73.0 66.0 Rock Drill 20 85 81 3 79.0 72.0 100 75.0 68.0
Roller 20 85 80 16 79.0 72.0 100 74.0 67.0
Sand Blasting (Single Nozzle) 20 85 96 9 79.0 72.0 100 90.0 83.0 Scraper 40 85 84 12 79.0 75.0 100 78.0 74.0
Shears (on backhoe) 40 85 96 5 79.0 75.0 100 90.0 86.0
Slurry Plant 100 78 78 1 72.0 72.0 100 72.0 72.0
Slurry Trenching Machine 50 82 80 75 76.0 73.0 100 74.0 71.0 Soil Mix Drill Rig 50 80 na 0 74.0 71.0 100
Tractor 40 84 na 0 78.0 74.0 100
Vacuum Excavator (Vac-truck) 40 85 85 149 79.0 75.0 100 79.0 75.0 Vacuum Street Sweeper 10 80 82 19 74.0 64.0 100 76.0 66.0 Ventilation Fan 100 85 79 13 79.0 79.0 100 73.0 73.0
Vibrating Hopper 50 85 87 1 79.0 76.0 100 81.0 78.0
Vibratory Concrete Mixer 20 80 80 1 74.0 67.0 100 74.0 67.0 Vibratory Pile Driver 20 95 101 44 89.0 82.0 100 95.0 88.0 Warning Horn 5 85 83 12 79.0 66.0 100 77.0 64.0
Welder / Torch 40 73 74 5 67.0 63.0 100 68.0 64.0
chipper 75
Source:

FHWA Roadway Construction Noise Model, January 2006. Table 9.1 U.S. Department of Transportation
CA/T Construction Spec. 721.560
Nightime Construction Activities- Concrete Pour
Location
Distance to Nearest
Receptor in feet
Interior Noise
Level (Leq dBA) Equipment
Usage
Factor1
threshold 3,077 Concrete Mixer Truck 0.4
Single-family Residence (West Parr
Avenue west of project site) 400 43.7
Concrete Mixer Truck

0.4 Rio Vista Middle School 1400 32.8 Concrete Pump Truck 0.16 River Bluff Elementary School 1550 32.0 Tractor 0.4

0.4 0.4

0.4 0.4
Ground Type hard
Source Height 8
Receiver Height 5
Ground Factor2 0.00
Predicted Noise Level 3
Concrete Mixer Truck 81.0
Concrete Mixer Truck 81.0
Concrete Pump Truck 74.0
Tractor 80.0

85.8 Sources:
1 Obtained from the FHWA Roadway Construction Noise Model, January 2006. Table 1. 2 Based on Figure 6-5 from the Federal Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment, 2006 (pg 6-23). 3 Based on the following from the Federal Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment, 2006 (pg 12-3).

67.7 85
Combined Predicted
Noise Level (Leq dBA)
Reference Emission
Noise Levels (Lmax) at 50
feet1

50.0 85

56.8 82

56.0 84
Leq dBA at 50 feet3
Combined Predicted Noise Level (Leq dBA at 50 feet)
Nightime Construction Activities- Concrete Pour
Location
Distance to Nearest
Receptor in feet Equipment
Usage
Factor1
threshold 5,104 Concrete Mixer Truck 1
Single-family Residence (West Parr
Avenue west of project site) 400 Concrete Mixer Truck 1 Rio Vista Middle School 1400 Concrete Pump Truck 1
River Bluff Elementary School 1550 Tractor 1
1 1
1 1
Ground Type hard
Source Height 8
Receiver Height 5
Ground Factor2 0.00
Predicted Noise Level 3
Concrete Mixer Truck 85.0
Concrete Mixer Truck 85.0
Concrete Pump Truck 82.0
Tractor 84.0

90.2 Sources:
1 Obtained from the FHWA Roadway Construction Noise Model, January 2006. Table 1. 2 Based on Figure 6-5 from the Federal Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment, 2006 (pg 6-23). 3 Based on the following from the Federal Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment, 2006 (pg 12-3).

72.1 85
Combined Predicted
Noise Level (Leq dBA)
Reference Emission
Noise Levels (Lmax) at 50
feet1

50.0 85

61.2 82

60.4 84
Combined Predicted Noise Level (Leq dBA at 50 feet)
Leq dBA at 50 feet3
Equipment
Description
Acoustical
Usage
Factor (%)
Spec
721.560
Lmax @
50ft (dBA
slow)
Actual
Measured
Lmax @
50ft
(dBA slow)
No. of
Actual Data
Samples
(count)
Spec
721.560
LmaxCalc
Spec
721.560
Leq
Distance
Actual
Measured
LmaxCalc
Actual
Measured
Leq
Auger Drill Rig 20 85 84 36 79.0 72.0 100 78.0 71.0
Backhoe 40 80 78 372 74.0 70.0 100 72.0 68.0
Bar Bender 20 80 na 0 74.0 67.0 100
Blasting na 94 na 0 88.0 100
Boring Jack Power Unit 50 80 83 1 74.0 71.0 100 77.0 74.0 Chain Saw 20 85 84 46 79.0 72.0 100 78.0 71.0
Clam Shovel (dropping) 20 93 87 4 87.0 80.0 100 81.0 74.0 Compactor (ground) 20 80 83 57 74.0 67.0 100 77.0 70.0
Compressor (air) 40 80 78 18 74.0 70.0 100 72.0 68.0
Concrete Batch Plant 15 83 na 0 77.0 68.7 100
Concrete Mixer Truck 40 85 79 40 79.0 75.0 100 73.0 69.0 Concrete Pump Truck 20 82 81 30 76.0 69.0 100 75.0 68.0 Concrete Saw 20 90 90 55 84.0 77.0 100 84.0 77.0
Crane 16 85 81 405 79.0 71.0 100 75.0 67.0
Dozer 40 85 82 55 79.0 75.0 100 76.0 72.0
Drill Rig Truck 20 84 79 22 78.0 71.0 100 73.0 66.0
Drum Mixer 50 80 80 1 74.0 71.0 100 74.0 71.0
Dump Truck 40 84 76 31 78.0 74.0 100 70.0 66.0
Excavator 40 85 81 170 79.0 75.0 100 75.0 71.0
Flat Bed Truck 40 84 74 4 78.0 74.0 100 68.0 64.0
Front End Loader 40 80 79 96 74.0 70.0 100 73.0 69.0
Generator 50 82 81 19 76.0 73.0 100 75.0 72.0
Generator (<25KVA, VMS s 50 70 73 74 64.0 61.0 100 67.0 64.0 Gradall 40 85 83 70 79.0 75.0 100 77.0 73.0
Grader 40 85 na 0 79.0 75.0 100
Grapple (on Backhoe) 40 85 87 1 79.0 75.0 100 81.0 77.0 Horizontal Boring Hydr. Jac 25 80 82 6 74.0 68.0 100 76.0 70.0 Hydra Break Ram 10 90 na 0 84.0 74.0 100
Impact Pile Driver 20 95 101 11 89.0 82.0 100 95.0 88.0 Jackhammer 20 85 89 133 79.0 72.0 100 83.0 76.0
Man Lift 20 85 75 23 79.0 72.0 100 69.0 62.0
Mounted Impact Hammer ( 20 90 90 212 84.0 77.0 100 84.0 77.0 Pavement Scarafier 20 85 90 2 79.0 72.0 100 84.0 77.0
Paver 50 85 77 9 79.0 76.0 100 71.0 68.0
Pickup Truck 40 55 75 1 49.0 45.0 100 69.0 65.0
Pneumatic Tools 50 85 85 90 79.0 76.0 100 79.0 76.0
Pumps 50 77 81 17 71.0 68.0 100 75.0 72.0
Refrigerator Unit 100 82 73 3 76.0 76.0 100 67.0 67.0
Rivit Buster/chipping gun 20 85 79 19 79.0 72.0 100 73.0 66.0 Rock Drill 20 85 81 3 79.0 72.0 100 75.0 68.0
Roller 20 85 80 16 79.0 72.0 100 74.0 67.0
Sand Blasting (Single Nozzle 20 85 96 9 79.0 72.0 100 90.0 83.0 Scraper 40 85 84 12 79.0 75.0 100 78.0 74.0
Shears (on backhoe) 40 85 96 5 79.0 75.0 100 90.0 86.0
Slurry Plant 100 78 78 1 72.0 72.0 100 72.0 72.0
Slurry Trenching Machine 50 82 80 75 76.0 73.0 100 74.0 71.0 Soil Mix Drill Rig 50 80 na 0 74.0 71.0 100
Tractor 40 84 na 0 78.0 74.0 100
Vacuum Excavator (Vac-tru 40 85 85 149 79.0 75.0 100 79.0 75.0 Vacuum Street Sweeper 10 80 82 19 74.0 64.0 100 76.0 66.0 Ventilation Fan 100 85 79 13 79.0 79.0 100 73.0 73.0
Vibrating Hopper 50 85 87 1 79.0 76.0 100 81.0 78.0
Vibratory Concrete Mixer 20 80 80 1 74.0 67.0 100 74.0 67.0 Vibratory Pile Driver 20 95 101 44 89.0 82.0 100 95.0 88.0 Warning Horn 5 85 83 12 79.0 66.0 100 77.0 64.0
Welder / Torch 40 73 74 5 67.0 63.0 100 68.0 64.0
Source:

FHWA Roadway Construction Noise Model, January 2006. Table 9.1 U.S. Department of Transportation
CA/T Construction Spec. 721.560
KEY: Orange cells are for input.

Grey cells are intermediate calculations performed by the model.

Green cells are data to present in a written analysis (output).

Table A. Propagation of vibration decibels (VdB) with distance Noise Source/ID Attenuated Noise Level at Receptor
vibration level distance vibration level distance
(VdB) @ (ft) (VdB) @ (ft)
Vibratory Roller 94 @ 25 77.3 @ 90 Distance to sensitive receptor Vibratory Roller 94 @ 25 80.0 @ 73 Threshold
Small bull dozer 58.0 @ 25 41.3 @ 90 80 vdb
Large bull dozer 87.0 @ 25 70.3 @ 90
Loaded trucks 86.0 @ 25 69.3 @ 90
The Lv metric (VdB) is used to assess the likelihood for vibration to result in human annoyance.

Table B. Propagation of peak particle velocity (PPV) with distance Noise Source/ID Attenuated Noise Level at Receptor
vibration level distance vibration level distance
(PPV) @ (ft) (PPV) @ (ft)
Vibratory Roller 0.210 @ 25 0.031 @ 90 Distance to sensitive receptor Vibratory Roller 0.210 @ 25 0.198 @ 26 Threshold
Small bull dozer 0.003 @ 25 0.000 @ 90
Large bull dozer 0.089 @ 25 0.013 @ 90 0.2 ppv
Loaded trucks 0.076 @ 25 0.011 @ 90
The PPV metric (in/sec) is used for assessing the likelihood for the potential of structural damage.

Notes:

Federal Transit Association (FTA). 2018 (September). Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual. FTA Report No. 0123. Washington, D.C. Accessed: December 20, 2020. Page Available:
https://www.transit.dot.gov/sites/fta.dot.gov/files/docs/research-innovation/118131/transit-noise-and-vibration-impact-assessment-manual-fta-report-no-0123_0.pdf Reference Noise Level
STEP 2A: Identify the vibration source and enter the reference vibration level (VdB) and distance.

Reference Noise Level
Computation of propagated vibration levels is based on the equations presented on pg. 185 of FTA 2018. Estimates of attenuated vibration levels do not account for reductions from intervening underground barriers or other underground structures of any type, or changes in soil type.

Distance Propagation Calculations for
Stationary Sources of Ground Vibration
STEP 1: Determine units in which to perform calculation. — If vibration decibels (VdB), then use Table A and proceed to Steps 2A and 3A. — If peak particle velocity (PPV), then use Table B and proceed to Steps 2B and 3B.

STEP 3A: Select the distance to
the receiver.

STEP 3B: Select the distance to
the receiver.

STEP 2B: Identify the vibration source and enter the reference peak particle velocity (PPV) and distance.

KEY: Orange cells are for input.

Grey cells are intermediate calculations performed by the model.

Green cells are data to present in a written analysis (output).

Table A. Propagation of vibration decibels (VdB) with distance Noise Source/ID Attenuated Noise Level at Receptor
vibration level distance vibration level distance
(VdB) @ (ft) (VdB) @ (ft) 80 vdb
loaded truck 86 @ 25 74.6 @ 60 Off-site improvements corresponding with infrastructure improvment 1 in PD loaded truck 86 @ 25 37.9 @ 1000 Off-site improvements corresponding with infrastructure improvment 3 in PD loaded truck 86 @ 25 70.8 @ 80 Off-site improvements corresponding with infrastructure improvment 5 in PD loaded truck 86 @ 25 79.9 @ 40 Threshold
The Lv metric (VdB) is used to assess the likelihood for vibration to result in human annoyance.

Table B. Propagation of peak particle velocity (PPV) with distance Noise Source/ID Attenuated Noise Level at Receptor
vibration level distance vibration level distance
(PPV) @ (ft) (PPV) @ (ft) 0.2 ppv
loaded truck 0.076 @ 25 0.020 @ 60 Off-site improvements corresponding with infrastructure improvment 1 in PD loaded truck 0.076 @ 25 0.000 @ 1000 Off-site improvements corresponding with infrastructure improvment 3 in PD loaded truck 0.076 @ 25 0.013 @ 80 Off-site improvements corresponding with infrastructure improvment 5 in PD loaded truck 0.076 @ 25 0.181 @ 14 Threshold
The PPV metric (in/sec) is used for assessing the likelihood for the potential of structural damage.

Notes:

STEP 3A: Select the distance to
the receiver.

STEP 3B: Select the distance to
the receiver.

STEP 2B: Identify the vibration source and enter the reference peak particle velocity (PPV) and distance.

KEY: Orange cells are for input.

Grey cells are intermediate calculations performed by the model.

Green cells are data to present in a written analysis (output).

Table A. Propagation of vibration decibels (VdB) with distance Noise Source/ID Attenuated Noise Level at Receptor
vibration level distance vibration level distance
(VdB) @ (ft) (VdB) @ (ft) 80 vdb
large bull dozer 87.0 @ 25 49.1 @ 460 Learn4Life Highschool large bull dozer 87.0 @ 25 79.9 @ 43 Threshold
The Lv metric (VdB) is used to assess the likelihood for vibration to result in human annoyance.

Table B. Propagation of peak particle velocity (PPV) with distance Noise Source/ID Attenuated Noise Level at Receptor
vibration level distance vibration level distance
(PPV) @ (ft) (PPV) @ (ft) 0.2 ppv
large bull dozer 0.089 @ 25 0.001 @ 460 Learn4Life Highschool large bull dozer 0.089 @ 25 0.191 @ 15 Threshold
The PPV metric (in/sec) is used for assessing the likelihood for the potential of structural damage.

Notes:

STEP 3A: Select the distance to
the receiver.

STEP 3B: Select the distance to
the receiver.

STEP 2B: Identify the vibration source and enter the reference peak particle velocity (PPV) and distance.

Decommissioning
Location
Distance to Nearest
Receptor in feet Equipment
Usage
Factor1
Threshold 1,732 Concrete Saw 0.2
Learn4Life Highschool 450 Excavator 0.4
Nearest Residence
(West San Jose Ave and
North Gates Ave) 1400
Excavator

0.4 Excavator 0.4
Dozer 0.4
Dozer 0.4
Ground Type Soft
Source Height 8
Receiver Height 5
Ground Factor2 0.63
Predicted Noise Level 3
Concrete Saw 83.0
Excavator 81.0
Excavator 81.0
Excavator 81.0
Dozer 81.0
Dozer 81.0
Sources:
1 Obtained from the FHWA Roadway Construction Noise Model, January 2006. Table 1. 2 Based on Figure 6-5 from the Federal Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment, 2006 (pg 6-23). 3 Based on the following from the Federal Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment, 2006 (pg 12-3).

50.4 88.5
Reference Emission
Noise Levels (Lmax) at 50
feet1
85 85
85 85

63.4 85
Combined Predicted
Noise Level (Leq dBA)

50.0 Combined Predicted Noise Level (Leq dBA at 50 feet) Leq dBA at 50 feet3
90 Equipment Description
Acoustical
Usage
Factor (%)
Spec
721.560
Lmax @
50ft (dBA
slow)
Actual
Measured
Lmax @
50ft
(dBA slow)
No. of
Actual Data
Samples
(count)
Spec
721.560
LmaxCalc
Spec
721.560
Leq
Distance
Actual
Measured
LmaxCalc
Actual
Measured
Leq
Auger Drill Rig 20 85 84 36 79.0 72.0 100 78.0 71.0
Backhoe 40 80 78 372 74.0 70.0 100 72.0 68.0
Bar Bender 20 80 na 0 74.0 67.0 100
Blasting na 94 na 0 88.0 100
Boring Jack Power Unit 50 80 83 1 74.0 71.0 100 77.0 74.0 Chain Saw 20 85 84 46 79.0 72.0 100 78.0 71.0
Clam Shovel (dropping) 20 93 87 4 87.0 80.0 100 81.0 74.0 Compactor (ground) 20 80 83 57 74.0 67.0 100 77.0 70.0
Compressor (air) 40 80 78 18 74.0 70.0 100 72.0 68.0
Concrete Batch Plant 15 83 na 0 77.0 68.7 100
Concrete Mixer Truck 40 85 79 40 79.0 75.0 100 73.0 69.0 Concrete Pump Truck 20 82 81 30 76.0 69.0 100 75.0 68.0 Concrete Saw 20 90 90 55 84.0 77.0 100 84.0 77.0
Crane 16 85 81 405 79.0 71.0 100 75.0 67.0
Dozer 40 85 82 55 79.0 75.0 100 76.0 72.0
Drill Rig Truck 20 84 79 22 78.0 71.0 100 73.0 66.0
Drum Mixer 50 80 80 1 74.0 71.0 100 74.0 71.0
Dump Truck 40 84 76 31 78.0 74.0 100 70.0 66.0
Excavator 40 85 81 170 79.0 75.0 100 75.0 71.0
Flat Bed Truck 40 84 74 4 78.0 74.0 100 68.0 64.0
Front End Loader 40 80 79 96 74.0 70.0 100 73.0 69.0
Generator 50 82 81 19 76.0 73.0 100 75.0 72.0
Generator (<25KVA, VMS signs) 50 70 73 74 64.0 61.0 100 67.0 64.0 Gradall 40 85 83 70 79.0 75.0 100 77.0 73.0
Grader 40 85 na 0 79.0 75.0 100
Grapple (on Backhoe) 40 85 87 1 79.0 75.0 100 81.0 77.0 Horizontal Boring Hydr. Jack 25 80 82 6 74.0 68.0 100 76.0 70.0 Hydra Break Ram 10 90 na 0 84.0 74.0 100
Impact Pile Driver 20 95 101 11 89.0 82.0 100 95.0 88.0 Jackhammer 20 85 89 133 79.0 72.0 100 83.0 76.0
Man Lift 20 85 75 23 79.0 72.0 100 69.0 62.0
Mounted Impact Hammer (hoe ram) 20 90 90 212 84.0 77.0 100 84.0 77.0 Pavement Scarafier 20 85 90 2 79.0 72.0 100 84.0 77.0
Paver 50 85 77 9 79.0 76.0 100 71.0 68.0
Pickup Truck 40 55 75 1 49.0 45.0 100 69.0 65.0
Pneumatic Tools 50 85 85 90 79.0 76.0 100 79.0 76.0
Pumps 50 77 81 17 71.0 68.0 100 75.0 72.0
Refrigerator Unit 100 82 73 3 76.0 76.0 100 67.0 67.0
Rivit Buster/chipping gun 20 85 79 19 79.0 72.0 100 73.0 66.0 Rock Drill 20 85 81 3 79.0 72.0 100 75.0 68.0
Roller 20 85 80 16 79.0 72.0 100 74.0 67.0
Sand Blasting (Single Nozzle) 20 85 96 9 79.0 72.0 100 90.0 83.0 Scraper 40 85 84 12 79.0 75.0 100 78.0 74.0
Shears (on backhoe) 40 85 96 5 79.0 75.0 100 90.0 86.0
Slurry Plant 100 78 78 1 72.0 72.0 100 72.0 72.0
Slurry Trenching Machine 50 82 80 75 76.0 73.0 100 74.0 71.0 Soil Mix Drill Rig 50 80 na 0 74.0 71.0 100
Tractor 40 84 na 0 78.0 74.0 100
Vacuum Excavator (Vac-truck) 40 85 85 149 79.0 75.0 100 79.0 75.0 Vacuum Street Sweeper 10 80 82 19 74.0 64.0 100 76.0 66.0 Ventilation Fan 100 85 79 13 79.0 79.0 100 73.0 73.0
Vibrating Hopper 50 85 87 1 79.0 76.0 100 81.0 78.0
Vibratory Concrete Mixer 20 80 80 1 74.0 67.0 100 74.0 67.0 Vibratory Pile Driver 20 95 101 44 89.0 82.0 100 95.0 88.0 Warning Horn 5 85 83 12 79.0 66.0 100 77.0 64.0
Welder / Torch 40 73 74 5 67.0 63.0 100 68.0 64.0
chipper 75
Source:

FHWA Roadway Construction Noise Model, January 2006. Table 9.1 U.S. Department of Transportation
CA/T Construction Spec. 721.560
Attenuation Calculations for Stationary Noise Sources (HVAC and Car Wash) KEY: Orange cells are for input.

Grey cells are intermediate calculations performed by the model.

Green cells are data to present in a written analysis (output).

Noise Source/ID Attenuated Noise Level at Receptor
noise level distance Ground Type noise level distance
(dBA) @ (ft) (soft/hard) (dBA) @ (ft)
HVAC units 70.0 @ 50 soft 10 5 0.62 46.4 @ 400
HVAC units 70.0 @ 50 hard 10 5 0.00 44.9 @ 900
Car Wash Dryers 69.0 @ 50 hard 10 5 0.00 43.9 @ 900
Notes:

Sources:

Computation of the ground factor is based on the equation presentd in Table 4-26 on pg. 86 of FTA 2018, where the distance of the reference noise leve can be adjusted and the usage factor is not applied (i.e., the usage factor is equal to 1).

Federal Transit Association (FTA). 2018 (September). Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment. Washington, D.C. Available:
<http://www.transit.dot.gov/sites/fta.dot.gov/files/docs/research-innovation/118131/transit-noise-and-vibration-impact-assessment-manual-fta-report-noSTEP 1: Identify the noise source and enter the reference noise level (dBA and distance).

STEP 2: Select the ground type (hard or soft),
and enter the source and receiver heights.

STEP 3: Select the distance to the
receiver.

Estimates of attenuated noise levels do not account for reductions from intervening barriers, including walls, trees, vegetation, or structures of any type.

Computation of the attenuated noise level is based on the equation presented on pg. 176 and 177 of FTA 2018.

Source
Height (ft)
Receiver
Height (ft)
Ground
Factor
Reference Noise Level Attenuation Characteristics
Attenuation Calculations for Stationary Noise Sources (Heavy Vehicle Loading) KEY: Orange cells are for input.

Grey cells are intermediate calculations performed by the model.

Green cells are data to present in a written analysis (output).

Noise Source/ID Attenuated Noise Level at Receptor
noise level distance Ground Type noise level distance
(dBA) @ (ft) (soft/hard) (dBA) @ (ft)
Operational Noise Lmax at
nearest residence 86.0 @ 50 hard 5 8 0.00 66.0 @ 500
Operational Noise CNEL at
nearest residence 88.7 @ 50 hard 5 8 0.00 68.7 @ 500
Operational Noise Leq at nearest
residence 84.0 @ 50 hard 5 8 0.00 64.0 @ 500

0.66 0.66

0.66 0.66
Notes:

Sources:

Federal Transit Association (FTA). 2018 (September). Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment. Washington, D.C. Available:
<http://www.transit.dot.gov/sites/fta.dot.gov/files/docs/research-innovation/118131/transit-noise-and-vibration-impact-assessment-manual-fta-reportSTEP 1: Identify the noise source and enter the reference noise level (dBA and distance).

STEP 2: Select the ground type (hard or soft),
and enter the source and receiver heights.

STEP 3: Select the distance to the
receiver.

Estimates of attenuated noise levels do not account for reductions from intervening barriers, including walls, trees, vegetation, or structures of any type.

Computation of the attenuated noise level is based on the equation presented on pg. 176 and 177 of FTA 2018.

Source
Height (ft)
Receiver
Height (ft)
Ground
Factor
Reference Noise Level Attenuation Characteristics
Attenuation Calculations for Stationary Noise Sources
KEY: Orange cells are for input.

Grey cells are intermediate calculations performed by the model.

Green cells are data to present in a written analysis (output).

Noise Source/ID Attenuated Noise Level at Receptor
noise level distance Ground Type noise level distance
(dBA) @ (ft) (soft/hard) (dBA) @ (ft)
Tire Center 65.0 @ 50 hard 2 5 0.00 46.9 @ 400
Notes:

Sources:

Federal Transit Association (FTA). 2018 (September). Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment. Washington, D.C. Available: <http://www.transit.dot.gov/sites/fta.dot.gov/files/docs/researchinnovation/118131/transit-noise-and-vibration-impact-assessment-manual-fta-report-no-0123_0.pdf>Accessed: March 5, 2020.

STEP 1: Identify the noise source and enter the reference noise level (dBA and distance). STEP 2: Select the ground type (hard or soft), and enter the source and receiver heights.

STEP 3: Select the distance to the
receiver.

Estimates of attenuated noise levels do not account for reductions from intervening barriers, including walls, trees, vegetation, or structures of any type.

Computation of the attenuated noise level is based on the equation presented on pg. 176 and 177 of FTA 2018.

Source
Height (ft)
Receiver
Height (ft)
Ground
Factor
Reference Noise Level Attenuation Characteristics
Parking Lot Noise Calculation
KEY: Orange cells are for input.

Green cells are data to present in a written analysis (output).

Number of automobiles per hour 2130
Number of buses per hour 0
Distance to sensitive receptor (feet) 400
distance sound level
Leq @ 50 65.7
Leq @ 400 47.6
Source
Federal Transit Administration. 2018 (September). Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment.

Washington, D.C. Available: https://www.transit.dot.gov/sites/fta.dot.gov/files/docs/researchinnovation/118131/transit-noise-and-vibration-impact-assessment-manual-fta-report-no-0123_0.pdf.

Accessed February 4, 2019. See pages 45–47, including Equation 4-14.

Attenuation Calculations for Stationary Noise Sources (Trash Compactor) KEY: Orange cells are for input.

Grey cells are intermediate calculations performed by the model.

Green cells are data to present in a written analysis (output).

Noise Source/ID Attenuated Noise Level at Receptor
noise level distance Ground Type noise level distance
(dBA) @ (ft) (soft/hard) (dBA) @ (ft)
Trash Compactor 50.0 @ 50 hard 5 5 0.00 31.9 @ 400 Distance to nearest residence west of project site Notes:

Sources:

Federal Transit Association (FTA). 2018 (September). Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment. Washington, D.C. Available: <http://www.transit.dot.gov/sites/fta.dot.gov/files/docs/researchinnovation/118131/transit-noise-and-vibration-impact-assessment-manual-fta-report-no-0123_0.pdf>Accessed: March 5, 2020.

STEP 1: Identify the noise source and enter the reference noise level (dBA and distance). STEP 2: Select the ground type (hard or soft), and enter the source and receiver heights.

STEP 3: Select the distance to
the receiver.

Estimates of attenuated noise levels do not account for reductions from intervening barriers, including walls, trees, vegetation, or structures of any type.

Computation of the attenuated noise level is based on the equation presented on pg. 176 and 177 of FTA 2018.

Source
Height (ft)
Receiver
Height (ft)
Ground
Factor
Reference Noise Level Attenuation Characteristics
Attenuation Calculations for Stationary Noise Sources
KEY: Orange cells are for input.

Grey cells are intermediate calculations performed by the model.

Green cells are data to present in a written analysis (output).

Noise Source/ID Attenuated Noise Level at Receptor
noise level distance Ground Type noise level distance
(dBA) @ (ft) (soft/hard) (dBA) @ (ft)
High range of typical SENL (Haul Truck) 90.0 @ 50 soft 8 5 0.63 92.6 @ 40 nearest recpetor w/ sound wall High range of typical SENL (Haul Truck) 90.0 @ 50 hard 8 5 0.00 91.9 @ 40 nearest recpetor w/ sound wall

0.66 0.66

0.66 0.66
Notes:

Sources:

STEP 2: Select the ground type (hard or soft),
and enter the source and receiver heights.

STEP 3: Select the distance to
the receiver.

Estimates of attenuated noise levels do not account for reductions from intervening barriers, including walls, trees, vegetation, or structures of any type.

Computation of the attenuated noise level is based on the equation presented on pg. 176 and 177 of FTA 2018.

Source
Height (ft)
Receiver
Height (ft)
Ground
Factor
Reference Noise Level Attenuation Characteristics

Fresno City CouncilMay 21, 2026

Fresno City Council
May 21, 2026