Agenda packet — Gardena City Council, April 25, 2023 (part 3 of 6)

1.1 Project Piecemealing
The MND does not accurately or adequately describe the project, meaning “the whole of an action, which has a potential for resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment” (CEQA § 15378). The project proposed by Gardena Industrial Center is a piecemealed portion of a larger overall project to be developed within the larger HITCO Carbon Composites property (HITCO I, II, and III as referred to in Appendix F - Phase I ESA) in the project vicinity.

CEQA § 15165 - Multiple and Phased Projects requires that “Where individual projects are, or a phased project is, to be undertaken and where the total undertaking comprises a project with significant environmental effect, the Lead Agency shall prepare a single program EIR for the ultimate project as described in Section 15168.” The MND misleads the public and decision makers by circumventing adequate and accurate environmental analysis for the whole of the action - construction and operation of all former HITCO properties as a whole. An EIR must be prepared which accurately represents the whole of the action without piecemealing the project into separate, smaller development projects or development areas to present unduly low environmental impacts.

Gardena Industrial Center is the second phase of the overall project, proceeded by 1720 West 135th Street (HITCO I),1 a 100,548 square foot industrial building. Notably, environmental review for the 1720 West 135th Street project could not be obtained online through the State CEQA Clearinghouse, which further aided the project in circumventing adequate environmental analysis.

An EIR must be prepared to provide an adequate and accurate environmental analysis for the whole of the action - construction and operation of all former HITCO properties as a whole.

2.0 Initial Study Checklist

2.4.3. Air Quality, 2.4.6. Energy, and 2.4.8. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Attached is a comprehensive air quality analysis by SWAPE.

The MND does not include for analysis relevant environmental justice issues in reviewing potential impacts, including cumulative impacts from the proposed project. This is especially significant as the surrounding community is highly burdened by pollution. According to CalEnviroScreen 4.02, CalEPA’s screening tool that ranks each census tract in the state for

1 https://www.omprop.com/case_studies/1720-w-135th-street/ 2 CalEnviroScreen 4.0 https://oehha.ca.gov/calenviroscreen/report/calenviroscreen-40

Page 3 ends

pollution and socioeconomic vulnerability, the proposed project’s censustract (6037602900) ranks worse than 99% of the rest of the state overall in overall pollution burden. The surrounding community, including Purche Avenue Elementary School and residences to the northwest, 135th Street Elementary School and residences to the east, and Junipero Serra High School and residences to the southwest, bears the impact of multiple sources of pollution and is more polluted than average on every pollution indicator measured by CalEnviroScreen. For example, the project census tract ranks in the 86th percentile for particulate matter (PM) 2.5, 69th percentile for diesel PM, and 50th percentile for traffic impacts, which are all typically attributed to high rates of heavy truck traffic in the area.

The census tract ranks in the 98th percentile for cleanup sites impacts. Cleanup sites are places that are contaminated with harmful chemicals and need to be cleaned up by the property owners or government3. People living near these sites are more likely to be exposed to chemicals from the sites than people living further away4. Some studies have shown that neighborhoods with cleanup sites are generally poorer and have more people of color than other neighborhoods5.

The census tract ranks in the 98th percentile for toxic releases and 97th percentile for hazardous waste impacts. People living near facilities that emit toxic releases may breathe contaminated air regularly or if contaminants are released during an accident6. Hazardous waste generators and facilities contribute to the contamination of air, water and soil near waste generators and facilities can harm the environment as well as people7.

The census tract ranks in the 90th percentile for impacts from solid waste. Solid waste facilities can release toxic gases into the air, even after they are closed8. Chemicals in waste can leach into the soil around the facility. These chemicals may eventually pose a health risk to people nearby9.

The census tract ranks in the 94th percentile for groundwater threats. People who live near contaminated groundwater may be exposed to chemicals moving from the soil into the air inside their homes10.

3 OEHHA Cleanup Sites https://oehha.ca.gov/calenviroscreen/indicator/cleanup-sites 4 Ibid.
5 Ibid.
6 OEHHA Toxic Releases https://oehha.ca.gov/calenviroscreen/indicator/toxic-releases-facilities 7 OEHHA Hazardous Waste Generators and Facilities
https://oehha.ca.gov/calenviroscreen/indicator/hazardous-waste-generators-and-facilities 8 OEHHA Solid Waste https://oehha.ca.gov/calenviroscreen/indicator/solid-waste-sites-and-facilities 9 Ibid.
10 OEHHA Groundwater Threats https://oehha.ca.gov/calenviroscreen/indicator/groundwater-threats

Page 4 ends

Further, the census tract is a diverse community including 76% Hispanic, 13% African-American, and 5% Asian-American residents, whom are especially vulnerable to the impacts of pollution. The community has a high rate of low educational attainment, meaning 89% of the census tract over age 25 has not attained a high school diploma, which is an indication that they may lack health insurance or access to medical care. Access to medical care is vital as the census tract ranks in the 81st percentile for low birth rates, 76th percentile for incidence of asthma, and 53rd percentile for incidence of cardiovascular disease. The community has a high rate of linguistic isolation, meaning 84% of households speak little to no English and face further inequities as a result. Additionally, the project’s census tract (6037602900) and the census tracts adjacent to the project site (6037603001 (east), 6037291120 (east), 6037602600 (west), 6037603500 (west), and 6037603005 (south)) are identified as SB 535 Disadvantaged Communities. The City’s Environmental Justice Element of the General Plan11 also identifies these census tracts as Disadvantaged Communities. None of these facts are discussed or presented for analysis in the MND.

California’s Building Energy Code Compliance Software (CBECC) is the State’s only approved energy compliance modeling software for non-residential buildings in compliance with Title 2412.

CalEEMod is not listed as an approved software. The CalEEMod-based modeling in the MND and appendices does not comply with the 2022 Building Energy Efficiency Standards and underreports the project’s significant Energy impacts and fuel consumption to the public and decision makers. Since the MND did not accurately or adequately model the energy impacts in compliance with Title 24, a finding of significance must be made. An EIR with modeling using the approved software (CBECC) must be circulated for public review in order to adequately analyze the project’s significant environmental impacts. This is vital as the MND utilizes CalEEMod as a source in its methodology and analysis, which is clearly not the approved software.

2.4.11 Land Use and Planning
The MND does not include a consistency analysis with the City’s General Plan. An EIR must be prepared which includes an analysis of the project in conjunction with all General Plan goals and policies in order to provide an adequate and accurate environmental analysis.

11 Gardena Environmental Justice Element https://cityofgardena.org/wpcontent/uploads/2022/06/Gardena_EJ-Element_FINAL-FOR-ADOPTION_with-APPENDIX.pdf 12 California Energy Commission 2022 Energy Code Compliance Software https://www.energy.ca.gov/programs-and-topics/programs/building-energy-efficiency-standards/2022- building-energy-efficiency-1

Page 5 ends

The MND does not include a consistency analysis with the goals of SCAG’s 2020-2045 RTP/SCS (Connect SoCal). Due to errors in modeling, modeling without supporting evidence, and project piecemealing as noted throughout this comment letter and attachments, the proposed project is inconsistent with Goal 5 to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve air quality, Goal 6 to support healthy and equitable communities, and Goal 7 to adapt to a changing climate. An EIR must be prepared to include an analysis with the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS Connect SoCal document.

2.4.14 Population and Housing
The MND concludes that impacts to population and housing will not be significant because “the employees that would fill the roles anticipated for the Proposed Project would come from the region and therefore not induce unplanned population growth in the area” without providing any quantified analysis or meaningful evidence to support this claim. The MND has not provided any calculation of the jobs generated by the project or evidence that the local population is qualified for or interested in work in the industrial sector.

There is also no analysis of projects approved, proposed, or “in the pipeline” of the City to demonstrate that the combined workforce of all projects does not exceed the growth estimates analyzed by the City’s General Plan or SCAG. Relying on the entire labor force within the greater SCAG region, to fill the project’s construction and operational jobs will increase VMT and emissions during all phases of construction and operations and a project EIR must be prepared to account for longer worker trip distances. SCAG’s Employment Density Study13 provides the following applicable employment generation rates for Los Angeles County:

Light Manufacturing: 1 employee per 829 square feet
Applying these ratios results in the following calculation:

Light Manufacturing: 180,860 sf / 829 sf = 219
Office: 10,000 sf / 319 sf = 32
Total: 251 employees
Utilizing SCAG’s Employment Density Study ratios, the proposed project will generate 251 employees. The MND utilizes uncertain and misleading language which does not provide any meaningful analysis of the project’s population and employment generation. In order to comply

13 SCAG Employment Density Study
http://www.mwcog.org/file.aspx?A=QTTlTR24POOOUIw5mPNzK8F4d8djdJe4LF9Exj6lXOU%3D

Page 6 ends

with CEQA’s requirements for meaningful disclosure, an EIR must be prepared to provide an accurate estimate of employees generated by all uses of the proposed project. It must also provide demographic and geographic information on the location of qualified workers to fill these positions.

SCAG’s Connect SoCal Demographics and Growth Forecast14 notes that the City will add 2,800 jobs between 2016 - 2045. Utilizing SCAG’s Employment Density Study calculation of 251 employees, the project represents 8.9% of the City’s employment growth from 2016 - 2045.

SCAG’s Growth Forecast notes that the City’s population will increase by 5,100 residents between 2016 - 2045. Utilizing SCAG’s Employment Density Study calculation of 251 employees, the project represents 4.9% of the City’s population growth from 2016 - 2045. A single project accounting for this amount of the projected employment and/or population over 29 yearsrepresents a significant amount of growth. An EIR must be prepared to include this analysis, and also provide a cumulative analysis discussion of projects approved since 2016 and projects “in the pipeline” to determine if the project will exceed SCAG’s employment growth forecast for the City.

Additionally, a project EIR must also provide demographic and geographic information on the location of qualified workers to fill these positions in order to provide an accurate environmental analysis.

2.4.17 Transportation
Appendix A: Transportation Impact Analysis states that “The base assumptions and technical methodologies (i.e., trip generation, vehicle miles traveled [VMT], etc.) used in this assessment were established in conjunction with the City and are consistent with SB 743 Implementation Transportation Analysis Updates (Fehr & Peers, June 2020) (City Guidelines).” However, the City Guidelines are not included as an attachment or listed as a reference in the Appendix or MND, which does not comply with CEQA’s requirements for adequate informational documents and meaningful disclosure (CEQA § 15121 and PRC 21003(b)). Incorporation by reference (CEQA § 15150 (f)) is not appropriate as these documents contribute directly to analysis of the problem at hand. Providing this information is vital as the City Guidelines are utilized to determine that the project will have a lessthan significant Transportation impact. An EIR must be prepared to include all application items for review, analysis, and comment by the public and decision makers.

Further, it is not appropriate to model the existing uses at full operational capacity in accordance with the ITE standards for use classifications. CEQA Section 15064.3 states that “Projects that decrease vehicle miles traveled in the project area compared to existing conditions should be

14 SCAG Connect SoCal Demographics and Growth Forecast adopted September 3, 2020 https://scag.ca.gov/sites/main/files/file-attachments/0903fconnectsocal_demographics-and-growthforecast.pdf?1606001579

Page 7 ends

presumed to have a less than significant transportation impact.” The Project Description states that existing conditions at the site consist of “existing on-site buildings, totaling 296,630 square feet of building space,” but does not provide an exact breakdown of each use classification in square feet. There is no method for the public to verify the exact quantity of square footage for each type of use, which directly influences the amount of VMT generated since the MND chose to utilize ITE land use code defaults for modeling. An EIR must be prepared to include the exact quantity of square footage for each type of use existing on the site in order to provide an adequate and accurate environmental analysis.

Further, the existing conditions of the site (including the existing quantity of vehicle traffic generated by the existing business) must be used as part of a revised VMT analysis. A site-specific traffic count must be performed at the project site (Weekday, Saturday, and Sunday) in order to provide an accurate description of existing conditions at the site. This is vital as the MND also relies on the notion that “After accounting for the removal of existing uses on site, the Project would result in net negative trip generation” and that "Based on the City Guidelines, the Project satisfies the Project Type Screening criteria by generating fewer than 110 daily trips,” in order to conclude the project will have less than significant impacts. The proposed project will generate 967 daily vehicle trips, which exceeds the 110 daily trip threshold by nearly nine times. The project’s 138 AM peak hour and 148 PM peak hour trips by themselves also exceed this threshold.

The existing vehicle trip generation must be provided as part of a Project EIR in order to provide an adequate and accurate environmental analysis. This is especially vital as the Trip Generation estimates in Appendix A are utilized in other areas of technical analysis (Air Quality, Energy, GHG), which also must be revised as part of a Project EIR.

The MND is internally inconsistent in its analysis of the proposed project, rendering it an inadequate informational document. The Transportation analysis concludes that the project will generate 178 fewer daily trips than existing conditions. Alternatively, the Population and Housing analysis relies upon the notion that “The employees that would fill the roles anticipated for the Proposed Project would come from the region and therefore not induce unplanned population growth in the area to conclude the project will have less than significant impacts. The Transportation analysis relies upon a workforce in close proximity to the project in order to artificially reduce impacts, yet the Population and Housing analysis relies on the entire available workforce/housing stock of the SCAG area to provide and absorb its workforce and demonstrate there will be no significant impacts. The Transportation analysis must be revised to reflect longer trip distances that employees will realistically travel to work at the proposed project. A Project EIR must also be prepared include a construction worker employment trip analysis must also be included to adequately and accurately analyze all potentially significant environmental impacts.

Page 8 ends

Appendix A sources the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) 2018 CEQA Guidelines Update and Technical Advisory 15 as contributing to the methodology for VMT analysis. The VMT analysis does not state if any truck/trailer trips were included for analysis.

The MND does not provide a statutory source of exemption for medium/heavy trucks. The OPR’s 2018 Technical Advisory which states that “here, the term “automobile” refers to on-road passenger vehicles,specifically cars and light trucks.” However, the purpose of the OPR Technical Advisory document is purely advisory, stating in its introduction:
“The purpose of this document is to provide advice and recommendations, which agencies and other entities may use at their discretion. This document does not alter lead agency discretion in preparing environmental documents subject to CEQA. This document should not be construed as legal advice.”
The OPR document is not a legal interpretation, court decision, or amendment to the CEQA statute that clarifies the definition of automobile. The term “automobile” is not defined in the CEQA statute and application of the OPR interpretation is speculative and does not provide an analysis of the “worst-case scenario” for environmental impacts. Widespread public understanding and perception indicates that trucks, including medium/heavy-duty truck/trailer trips associated with the industrial nature of warehouse operations, are automobiles. An EIR must be prepared to include all truck/trailer activity for quantified VMT analysis. The proposed project is applying for a CUP to operate a warehouse building. The operational nature of industrial/warehouse uses involves high rates of truck/trailer VMT due to traveling from large import hubs to regional distribution centers to smaller industrial parks and then to their final delivery destinations. Once employees arrive at work, they will conduct their jobs by driving delivery vans across the region as part of the daily operations as a distribution facility, which will drastically increase projectgenerated VMT. The project’s truck/trailer and delivery van activity is unable to utilize public transit or active transportation and it is misleading to the public and decision makers to exclude this activity from VMT analysis. An EIR must be prepared to reflect a quantified VMT analysis that includes all truck/trailer and delivery van activity to adequately and accurately analyze the potentially significant project transportation impacts.

The MND has not adequately analyzed the project’s potential to substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses; or the project’s potential to result in inadequate emergency access. The MND has not provided any exhibits depicting the available truck/trailer turning radius at the intersection of the project driveways to determine if there is enough space available to accommodate heavy truck

15 Governor’s Office of Planning and Research Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA https://opr.ca.gov/ceqa/docs/20190122-743_Technical_Advisory.pdf

Page 9 ends

maneuvering. Further, there are no exhibits providing on-site analysis regarding available space on the property to accommodate heavy truck maneuvering. There are also no exhibits depicting emergency vehicle access. Notably, the on-site truck circulation pathway is bordered on both sides by passenger car parking spaces immediately adjacent to the south side of the building and the parking lot. Maneuvering a turn around the building may be rendered impossible for a heavy truck and/or emergency vehicle when all of these parking spaces are occupied with vehicles. Deferring this environmental analysis required by CEQA to the construction permitting phase is improper mitigation and does not comply with CEQA’s requirement for meaningful disclosure and adequate informational documents. An EIR must be prepared for the proposed project with this analysis, including turning radius diagrams at the project driveway intersections and throughout the site’s internal circulation points, in order to provide an adequate and accurate environmental analysis.

Conclusion
For the foregoing reasons, GSEJA believes the MND is flawed and an EIR must be prepared for the proposed project and circulated for public review. Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance requests to be added to the public interest list regarding any subsequent environmental documents, public notices, public hearings, and notices of determination for this project. Send all communications to Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance P.O. Box 79222 Corona, CA 92877.

Sincerely,
Gary Ho
Blum Collins & Ho, LLP
Attachment: SWAPE Analysis
2656 29th Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, CA 90405
Matt Hagemann, P.G, C.Hg.
(949) 887-9013
[email protected]
Paul E. Rosenfeld, PhD
(310) 795-2335
[email protected]
November 11, 2022
Gary Ho
Blum Collins LLP
707 Wilshire Blvd, Ste. 4880
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Subject: Comments on the Gardena Industrial Center Project (SCH No. 2022100279) Dear Mr. Ho,
We have reviewed the October 2022 Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (“IS/MND”) for the Gardena Industrial Center Project (“Project”) located in the City of Gardena (“City”). The Project proposes to demolish 296-630-square-feet (“SF”) of existing structures and construct 180,860-SF of industrial uses, 10,000-SF of office uses, and 220 parking spaces on the 8.46-acre site.

Our review concludes that the IS/MND fails to adequately evaluate the Project’s air quality and health risk impacts. As a result, emissions and health risk impacts associated with construction and operation of the proposed Project are underestimated and inadequately addressed. An Environmental Impact Report (“EIR”) should be prepared to adequately assess and mitigate the potential air quality and health risk impacts that the project may have on the environment.

Air Quality
Unsubstantiated Input Parameters Used to Estimate Project Emissions The IS/MND’s air quality analysis relies on emissions calculated with the California Emissions Estimator Model (“CalEEMod”) Version 2020.4.0 (p. 38).1 CalEEMod provides recommended default values based on site-specific information, such as land use type, meteorological data, total lot acreage, project type and typical equipment associated with project type. If more specific project information is known, the user can change the default values and input project-specific values, but the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) requires that such changes be justified by substantial evidence. Once all of the 1 “CalEEMod Version 2020.4.0.” California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021, available at: https://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/download-model.
2 values are inputted into the model, the Project's construction and operational emissions are calculated, and "output files" are generated. These output files disclose to the reader what parameters are utilized in calculating the Project's air pollutant emissions and make known which default values are changed as well as provide justification for the values selected.

When reviewing the Project’s CalEEMod output files, provided in the Air Quality Memo (“AQ Memo”) and Greenhouse Gas Memo (“GHG Memo”) as Appendix B and Appendix C, respectively, to the IS/MND, we found that several model inputs were not consistent with information disclosed in the IS/MND. As a result, the Project’s construction and operational emissions are underestimated. An EIR should be prepared to include an updated air quality analysis that adequately evaluates the impacts that construction and operation of the Project will have on local and regional air quality.

Unsubstantiated Change to Architectural Coating Phase Length Review of the CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the “Hitco Proposed” model includes a manual change to the default architectural coating construction phase length (see excerpt below) (Appendix B, pp. 42; Appendix C, pp. 42).

As a result of this change, the model includes the following construction schedule (see excerpt below) (Appendix B, pp. 47; Appendix C, pp. 47):

As demonstrated above, the architectural coating phase is increased by 245%, from the default value of 20 to 69 days. As previously mentioned, the CalEEMod User’s Guide requires any changes to model defaults be justified.2 According to the “User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data” table, the justification provided for this change is:
“Adjusted coating to simultaneous with last third of building construction” (Appendix B, pp. 2; Appendix C, pp. 42).

Furthermore, regarding the Project’s anticipated construction schedule, the IS/MND states:
2 “CalEEMod User’s Guide.” California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021, available at:
https://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide, p. 1, 14.
3 “The demolition and construction phases of the Proposed Project are tentatively scheduled to start in 2023 and anticipated to take approximately 12-14 months” (p. 3).

However, the revised architectural coating phase length remains unsupported. While the IS/MND substantiates the total construction duration of approximately 12 to 14 months, the IS/MND fails to mention or justify the individual architectural coating phase length. This is incorrect, as according to the CalEEMod User’s Guide:
“CalEEMod was also designed to allow the user to change the defaults to reflect site- or projectspecific information, when available, provided that the information is supported by substantial evidence as required by CEQA.” 3

Here, as the IS/MND only justifies the total construction of 12 to 14 months, the IS/MND fails to provide substantial evidence to support the revised individual architectural coating phase length. As such, we cannot verify the change.

This unsubstantiated change presents an issue, as the construction emissions are improperly spread out over a longer period of time for the architectural coating phase. According to the CalEEMod User’s Guide, each construction phase is associated with different emissions activities (see excerpt below).4 Thus, by disproportionately extending the architectural coating phase length without proper justification, the model assumes a greater number of days to complete the construction activities required by the architectural coating phase. As such, there will be fewer construction activities required per day and, consequently, less pollutants emitted per day. As a result, the model may underestimate the peak daily emissions associated with the architectural coating phase of construction and should not be relied upon to determine Project significance.
3 “CalEEMod User’s Guide.” California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021, available at:
https://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide, p. 13-14. 4 “CalEEMod User’s Guide.” California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021, available at:
https://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide, p. 32.
4 Unsubstantiated Reduction to Acres of Grading Value
Review of the CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the “Hitco Proposed” model includes reductions to the default acres of grading values (see excerpt below) (Appendix B, pp. 43; Appendix C, pp. 43).

As previously mentioned, the CalEEMod User’s Guide requires any changes to model defaults be justified.5 According to the “User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data” table, the justification provided for this change is:
“Adjusted grading area to site acreage” (Appendix B, pp. 42; Appendix C, pp. 42).

Furthermore, the IS/MND indicates that the Project site is approximately 8.46 acres (p. 37). However, these changes are incorrect. According to the CalEEMod User’s Guide states:
“[T]he dimensions (e.g., length and width) of the grading site have no impact on the calculation, only the total area to be graded. In order to properly grade a piece of land multiple passes with equipment may be required. The acres are based on the equipment list and days in grading or site preparation phase according to the anticipated maximum number of acres a given piece of equipment can pass over in an 8-hour workday.”6
As demonstrated above, the acres of grading values are based on construction equipment and the length of the grading and site preparation phases. Thus, as the dimensions of the Project site have no impact on the acres of grading values, the revised values are unsubstantiated.

These unsubstantiated reductions present an issue, as CalEEMod uses the acres of grading values to estimate the dust emissions associated with grading.7 Thus, by including unsubstantiated reductions to the default acres of grading values, the model may underestimate the Project’s construction-related emissions and should not be relied upon to determine Project significance.

Failure to Model All Required Demolition
Review of the CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the “Hitco Proposed” model includes 1,050 default demolition hauling trips (see excerpt below) (Appendix B, pp. 48; Appendix C, pp. 48). 5 “CalEEMod User’s Guide.” California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021, available at:
https://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide, p. 1, 14. 6 “Appendix A – Calculation Details for CalEEMod.” California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide, p. 9. 7 “Appendix A – Calculation Details for CalEEMod.” California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021, available at: https://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide, p. 9. 5 However, the number of demolition hauling trips is underestimated. According to the CalEEMod User’s Guide:
“Haul trips are based on the amount of material that is demolished, imported or exported assuming a truck can handle 16 cubic yards of material.”8 Therefore, CalEEMod calculates a default number of hauling trips based upon the amount of demolition material inputted into the model. Regarding the anticipated amount of demolition, the IS/MND states:
“The Proposed Project involves the demolition of all existing on-site buildings, totaling 296,630 square feet of building space, parking lots, and associated improvements” (p. 2).

As such, the model should have included 296,630-SF of demolition debris, which when correctly input into CalEEMod calculates a default demolition hauling trip number of 1,349 trips.9 Thus, the number of demolition hauling trips is underestimated by 299 trips, indicating that the model fails to include the total amount of demolition required for the Project.10
This underestimation presents an issue, as the amount of demolition material inputted into the model is used by CalEEMod to determine emissions associated with this phase of construction. The three primary operations that generate dust emissions during the demolition phase are mechanical or explosive dismemberment, site removal of debris, and on-site truck traffic on paved and unpaved road.11 Thus, by failing to include the full amount of required demolition, the model may underestimate the Project’s construction-related emissions and should not be relied upon to determine Project significance.

Failure to Include Material Export
Regarding the amount of material export required for Project construction, the IS/MND states:
8 http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/caleemod/02_appendix-a2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=6, p. 14 9 See Attachment A for Updated CalEEMod Output files. 10 Calculated: 1,349 required hauling trips – 1,050 modeled hauling trips = 299 underestimated hauling trips. 11 “Appendix A – Calculation Details for CalEEMod.” California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide, p. 11. 6 “The approximate earthwork numbers are 20,749 cubic yards of cut, 20,749 cubic yards of fill and 17,721 cubic yards of over-excavation as shown in Figure 6a, Grading Plan, and Figure 6b, Grading Plan” (p. 3).

As such, the model should have included 17,721 cubic yards (“cy”) of material export. However, review of the CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the “Hitco Proposed” model fails to include any amount of material export (Attachment B, pp. 43; Appendix C, pp. 43). As such, the material export required for Project construction is underestimated and the model is inconsistent with the IS/MND.

This inconsistency presents an issue, as the inclusion of material export within the model is used to calculate emissions produced from material movement, including truck loading and unloading, and additional hauling truck trips.12 Thus, by failing to include the amount of material export required for Project construction, the model underestimates the Project’s construction-related emissions and should not be relied upon to determine Project significance.

Updated Analysis Indicates a Potentially Significant Air Quality Impact In an effort to more accurately estimate the Project’s construction-related and operational emissions, we prepared an updated CalEEMod model, using the Project-specific information provided by the IS/MND. In our updated model, we omitted the unsubstantiated changes to the architectural coating construction phase length and acres of grading values; and included the correct amounts of demolition and material export.13
Our updated analysis estimates that the Project’s construction-related VOC emissions would exceed the applicable South Coast Air Quality Management District (“SCAQMD”) threshold of 75 pounds per day (“lbs/day”), as referenced by the IS/MND (p. 38, Table 4) (see table below).14 SWAPE Criteria Air Pollutant Emissions
Construction VOC
(lbs/day)
IS/MND 29
SWAPE 91.2
% Increase 214%
SCAQMD Threshold 75
Exceeds? Yes
As demonstrated in the table above, the Project’s construction-related VOC emissions, as estimated by SWAPE, increase by approximately 214% and exceed the applicable SCAQMD significance threshold.

Thus, our updated model demonstrates that the Project would result in a potentially significant air 12 “CalEEMod User’s Guide.” California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), May 2021, available at:
https://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/user's-guide, p. 2, 34. 13 See Attachment A for updated air modeling. 14 “South Coast AQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds.” SCAQMD, April 2019, available at:
http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/scaqmd-air-quality-significance-thresholds.pdf. 7 quality impact that was not previously identified or addressed in the IS/MND. As a result, an EIR should be prepared to adequately assess and mitigate the potential air quality impacts that the Project may have on the environment.

Disproportionate Health Risk Impacts of Warehouses on Surrounding Communities Upon review of the IS/MND, we have determined that the development of the proposed Project would result in disproportionate health risk impacts on community members living, working, and going to school within the immediate area of the Project site. According to the SCAQMD:
“Those living within a half mile of warehouses are more likely to include communities of color, have health impacts such as higher rates of asthma and heart attacks, and a greater environmental burden.”15
In particular, the SCAQMD found that more than 2.4 million people live within a half mile radius of at least one warehouse, and that those areas not only experience increased rates of asthma and heart attacks, but are also disproportionately Black and Latino communities below the poverty line.16 Another study similarly indicates that “neighborhoods with lower household income levels and higher percentages of minorities are expected to have higher probabilities of containing warehousing facilities.”17 Additionally, a report authored by the Inland Empire-based People’s Collective for Environmental Justice and University of Redlands states:
“As the warehouse and logistics industry continues to grow and net exponential profits at record rates, more warehouse projects are being approved and constructed in low-income communities of color and serving as a massive source of pollution by attracting thousands of polluting truck trips daily. Diesel trucks emit dangerous levels of nitrogen oxide and particulate matter that cause devastating health impacts including asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cancer, and premature death. As a result, physicians consider these pollutionburdened areas ‘diesel death zones.”18 15 “South Coast AQMD Governing Board Adopts Warehouse Indirect Source Rule.” SCAQMD, May 2021, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/news-archive/2021/board-adopts-waisr-may7-2021.pdf?sfvrsn=9. 16 “Southern California warehouse boom a huge source of pollution. Regulators are fighting back.” Los Angeles Times, May 2021, available at: https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2021-05-05/air-quality-officials-targetwarehouses-bid-to-curb-health-damaging-truck-pollution. 17 “Location of warehouses and environmental justice: Evidence from four metros in California.” Metro Freight Center of Excellence, January 2018, available at:
https://www.metrans.org/assets/research/MF%201.1g_Location%20of%20warehouses%20and%20environmental %20justice_Final%20Report_021618.pdf, p. 21. 18 “Warehouses, Pollution, and Social Disparities: An analytical view of the logistics industry’s impacts on environmental justice communities across Southern California.” People’s Collective for Environmental Justice, April 2021, available at:
https://earthjustice.org/sites/default/files/files/warehouse_research_report_4.15.2021.pdf, p. 4. 8 It is evident that the continued development of industrial warehouses within these communities poses a significant environmental justice challenge. However, the acceleration of warehouse development is only increasing despite the consequences on public health.

Warehouses generate smog-causing nitrogen oxides and diesel particulate matter pollution, which are linked to health problems including respiratory conditions. Specifically, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) indicates that ozone, the main ingredient in “smog,” can cause aggravating lung diseases and increasing the frequency of asthma attacks. The U.S. EPA states:
“Children are at greatest risk from exposure to ozone because their lungs are still developing and they are more likely to be active outdoors when ozone levels are high, which increases their exposure. Children are also more likely than adults to have asthma.” 19 Furthermore, regarding the increased sensitivity of early-life exposures to inhaled pollutants, the California Air Resources Board (“CARB”) states:
“Children are often at greater risk from inhaled pollutants, due to the following reasons:
• Children have unique activity patterns and behavior. For example, they crawl and play on the ground, amidst dirt and dust that may carry a wide variety of toxicants. They often put their hands, toys, and other items into their mouths, ingesting harmful substances. Compared to adults, children typically spend more time outdoors and are more physically active. Time outdoors coupled with faster breathing during exercise increases children’s relative exposure to air pollution. • Children are physiologically unique. Relative to body size, children eat, breathe, and drink more than adults, and their natural biological defenses are less developed. The protective barrier surrounding the brain is not fully developed, and children’s nasal passages aren’t as effective at filtering out pollutants. Developing lungs, immune, and metabolic systems are also at risk.
• Children are particularly susceptible during development. Environmental exposures during fetal development, the first few years of life, and puberty have the greatest potential to influence later growth and development.”20 A Stanford-led study also reveals that children exposed to high levels of air pollution are more susceptible to respiratory and cardiovascular diseases in adulthood.21 Thus, given children’s higher propensity to succumb to the negative health impacts of air pollutants, and as warehouses release more 19 “Health Effects of Ozone Pollution.” U.S. EPA, May 2021, available at: https://www.epa.gov/ground-level-ozonepollution/health-effects-ozone-pollution. 20 “Children and Air Pollution.” California Air Resources Board (CARB), available at:
https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/resources/documents/children-and-air-pollution. 21 “Air pollution puts children at higher risk of disease in adulthood, according to Stanford researchers and others.” Stanford, February 2021, available at: https://news.stanford.edu/2021/02/22/air-pollution-impacts-childrenshealth/. 9 smog-forming pollution than any other sector, it is necessary to evaluate the specific health risk that warehouses pose to children in the nearby community.

According to the above-mentioned study by the People’s Collective for Environmental Justice and University of Redlands, there are 640 schools in the South Coast Air Basin that are located within half a mile of a large warehouse, most of them in socio-economically disadvantaged areas.22 Regarding the proposed Project itself, the IS/MND indicates that several schools are located within the immediate vicinity of the Project site, stating:
“The Project Site is located approximately 0.85 miles west of 135th Street Elementary School, approximately 0.83 miles east of Purchee Avenue Elementary School, and approximately 0.73 miles east of Maria Regina School” (p. 71, 72).

As demonstrated above, three schools are located within 1-mile of the Project site. This poses a significant threat because, as outlined above, children are a vulnerable population that are especially susceptible to the damaging side effects of air pollution. As such, the Project would have detrimental short-term and long-term health impacts on local children if approved.

An EIR should be prepared to evaluate the disproportionate impacts of the proposed warehouse on the community adjacent to the Project, including an analysis of the impact on children and people of color who live and attend school in the surrounding area. Finally, in order to evaluate the cumulative air quality impact from the several warehouse projects proposed or built in a one-mile radius of the Project site, the EIR should prepare a cumulative health risk assessment (“HRA”) to quantify the adverse health outcome from the effects of exposure to multiple warehouses in the immediate area in conjunction with the poor ambient air quality in the Project’s census tract.

Diesel Particulate Matter Emissions Inadequately Evaluated The IS/MND concludes that the Project would have a less-than-significant health risk impact without conducting a quantified construction or operational health risk analysis (“HRA”). Regarding the health risk impacts associated with the Project, the IS/MND states:
“Relative to Localized Significance Thresholds, project construction emissions would not exceed these LST thresholds. On-site construction associated with Project construction would not result in a significant impact to sensitive receptors. In addition to the potential for localized impacts described previously, construction has the potential to result in DPM emissions. The Project would result in a short-term addition of truck trips occurring over a few months. However, the Project Site is currently a source of truck trips, so the net change in trips during the construction period would not be substantial as there are existing truck trips currently. Total construction emissions would be below SCAQMD significance thresholds for particulate matter. Construction 22 “Warehouses, Pollution, and Social Disparities: An analytical view of the logistics industry’s impacts on environmental justice communities across Southern California.” People’s Collective for Environmental Justice, April 2021, available at:
https://earthjustice.org/sites/default/files/files/warehouse_research_report_4.15.2021.pdf, p. 4. 10 associated with implementation of the Project would not result in a significant impact to sensitive receptors related to DPM” (p. 42).

As demonstrated above, the IS/MND states that the Project’s construction-related health risk impact is less-than-significant as emissions do not exceed SCAQMD Localized Significance Thresholds (“LSTs”).

Furthermore, regarding the project’s potential operational health risk impacts, the IS/MND states:
“Regarding sensitive receptors, the Project Site is currently developed with industrial uses in an existing industrial area. Operation of the Project would be similar to existing conditions. As shown previously in Table 5, the project would result in a net decrease in vehicle emissions compared to existing site operations. Therefore, the Project does not propose any new facilities that would require a health risk assessment for sensitive receptors” (p. 42).

As demonstrated above, the IS/MND states that the Project would result in a less-than-significant operational health risk impact because the proposed facilities are not substantial sources of DPM emissions. However, the IS/MND’s evaluation of the Project’s potential health risk impacts, as well as the subsequent less-than-significant impact conclusion, is incorrect for three reasons.

First, the use of a LST analysis to determine the health risk impacts posed to nearby, existing sensitive receptors as a result of the Project’s construction-related TAC emissions is incorrect. While the LST method assesses the impact of pollutants at a local level, it only evaluates impacts from criteria air pollutants. According to the Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology document prepared by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (“SCAQMD”), LST analyses are only applicable to NOx, CO, PM10, and PM2.5 emissions, which are collectively referred to as criteria air pollutants.23 Because LST methods can only be applied to criteria air pollutants, they cannot be used to determine whether emissions from TACs, specifically DPM, a known human carcinogen, would result in a significant health risk impact to nearby sensitive receptors. As a result, health impacts during Project construction from exposure to TACs, such as DPM, were not analyzed, thus leaving a gap in the IS/MND’s analysis.

Second, by failing to prepare a quantified construction and operational HRA, the Project is inconsistent with CEQA’s requirement to make “a reasonable effort to substantively connect a project’s air quality impacts to likely health consequences.” 24 This poses a problem, as according to the IS/MND, construction of the Project would produce DPM emissions through the exhaust stacks of construction equipment over a duration of approximately 12 to 14 months (p. 3). According to the Transportation Impact Analysis (“TIA”), operation of the Project is anticipated to generate 967 daily vehicle trips, which would produce additional exhaust emissions and continue to expose nearby, existing sensitive receptors to DPM emissions (Appendix A, pp. 9). However, the IS/MND fails to evaluate the TAC emissions associated with Project construction and operation or indicate the concentrations at which such pollutants would trigger adverse health effects. Thus, without making a reasonable effort to connect the 23 “Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology.” South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), Revised July 2008, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/localized-significancethresholds/final-lst-methodology-document.pdf. 24 “Sierra Club v. County of Fresno.” Supreme Court of California, December 2018, available at:
https://ceqaportal.org/decisions/1907/Sierra%20Club%20v.%20County%20of%20Fresno.pdf. 11 Project’s TAC emissions to the potential health risks posed to nearby receptors, the IS/MND is inconsistent with CEQA’s requirement to correlate Project-generated emissions with potential adverse impacts on human health.

Third, the State of California Department of Justice recommends that warehouse projects prepare a quantitative HRA pursuant to the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (“OEHHA”), the organization responsible for providing guidance on conducting HRAs in California, as well as local air district guidelines.25 OEHHA released its most recent Risk Assessment Guidelines: Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments in February 2015. This guidance document describes the types of projects that warrant the preparation of an HRA. Specifically, OEHHA recommends that all short-term projects lasting at least 2 months assess cancer risks.26 Furthermore, according to OEHHA:
“Exposure from projects lasting more than 6 months should be evaluated for the duration of the project. In all cases, for assessing risk to residential receptors, the exposure should be assumed to start in the third trimester to allow for the use of the ASFs (OEHHA, 2009).”27 Thus, as the Project’s anticipated construction duration exceeds the 2-month and 6-month requirements set forth by OEHHA, construction of the Project meets the threshold warranting a quantified HRA under OEHHA guidance and should be evaluated for the entire 12-month construction period. Furthermore, OEHHA recommends that an exposure duration of 30 years should be used to estimate the individual cancer risk at the maximally exposed individual resident (“MEIR”).28 While the IS/MND fails to provide the expected lifetime of the proposed Project, we can reasonably assume that the Project would operate for at least 30 years, if not more. Therefore, operation of the Project also exceeds the 2-month and 6-month requirements set forth by OEHHA and should be evaluated for the entire 30-year residential exposure duration, as indicated by OEHHA guidance. These recommendations reflect the most recent state health risk policies, and as such, an EIR should be prepared to include an analysis of health risk impacts posed to nearby sensitive receptors from Project-generated DPM emissions.

Fourth, by claiming a less-than-significant impact without conducting a quantified construction or operational HRA for nearby, existing sensitive receptors, the IS/MND fails to compare the Project’s excess cancer risk to the SCAQMD’s specific numeric threshold of 10 in one million.29 Thus, in 25 “Warehouse Projects: Best Practices and Mitigation Measures to Comply with the California Environmental Quality Act.” State of California Department of Justice, available at:
https://oag.ca.gov/sites/all/files/agweb/pdfs/environment/warehouse-best-practices.pdf, p. 6. 26 “Risk Assessment Guidelines: Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf, p. 8-18. 27 “Risk Assessment Guidelines: Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf, p. 8-18. 28 “Risk Assessment Guidelines: Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf, p. 2-4. 29 “South Coast AQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds.” SCAQMD, April 2019, available at:
http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/scaqmd-air-quality-significance-thresholds.pdf. 12 accordance with the most relevant guidance, an assessment of the health risk posed to nearby, existing receptors as a result of Project construction and operation should be conducted.

Screening-Level Analysis Demonstrates Potentially Significant Health Risk Impact In order to conduct our screening-level risk assessment we relied upon AERSCREEN, which is a screening level air quality dispersion model.30 As discussed above, the model replaced SCREEN3, and AERSCREEN is included in the OEHHA and the California Air Pollution Control Officers Associated (“CAPCOA”) guidance as the appropriate air dispersion model for Level 2 health risk screening assessments (“HRSAs”).31, 32 A Level 2 HRSA utilizes a limited amount of site-specific information to generate maximum reasonable downwind concentrations of air contaminants to which nearby sensitive receptors may be exposed. If an unacceptable air quality hazard is determined to be possible using AERSCREEN, a more refined modeling approach is required prior to approval of the Project.

We prepared a preliminary HRA of the Project’s construction and operational health risk impact to residential sensitive receptors using the annual PM10 exhaust estimates from the IS/MND’s CalEEMod output files. Consistent with recommendations set forth by OEHHA, we assumed residential exposure begins during the third trimester stage of life.33 The IS/MND’s CalEEMod model indicates that construction activities will generate approximately 211 pounds of DPM over the 514-day construction period.34 The AERSCREEN model relies on a continuous average emission rate to simulate maximum downward concentrations from point, area, and volume emission sources. To account for the variability in equipment usage and truck trips over Project construction, we calculated an average DPM emission rate by the following equation:

𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅 �
𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔
𝑠𝑠 𝑠𝑠
� = 210.9 𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙
514 𝑑𝑑
×
453.6 𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔
𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙 ×
1 𝑑𝑑
24 ℎ 𝑜𝑜
×
1 ℎ 𝑜𝑜
3,600 𝑠𝑠 𝑠𝑠 = 𝟎𝟎. 𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎 𝒈𝒈/𝒔𝒔
Using this equation, we estimated a construction emission rate of 0.00215 grams per second (“g/s”).

Subtracting the 514-day construction period from the total residential duration of 30 years, we assumed that after Project construction, the sensitive receptor would be exposed to the Project’s operational DPM for an additional 28.59 years. The IS/MND’s operational CalEEMod emissions indicate that operational activities will generate approximately 3 net pounds of DPM per year throughout operation.

Applying the same equation used to estimate the construction DPM rate, we estimated the following emission rate for Project operation:
30 “AERSCREEN Released as the EPA Recommended Screening Model,” U.S. EPA, April 2011, available at:
http://www.epa.gov/ttn/scram/guidance/clarification/20110411_AERSCREEN_Release_Memo.pdf 31 “Risk Assessment Guidelines: Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf. 32 “Health Risk Assessments for Proposed Land Use Projects.” CAPCOA, July 2009, available at:
http://www.capcoa.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/CAPCOA_HRA_LU_Guidelines_8-6-09.pdf. 33 “Risk Assessment Guidelines: Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf, p. 8-18. 34 See Attachment A for health risk calculations. 13 𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅 �
𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔
𝑠𝑠 𝑠𝑠
� = 3.0 𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙
365 𝑑𝑑
×
453.6 𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔
𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙 ×
1 𝑑𝑑
24 ℎ 𝑜𝑜
×
1 ℎ 𝑜𝑜
3,600 𝑠𝑠 𝑠𝑠 = 𝟎𝟎. 𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎 𝒈𝒈/𝒔𝒔
Using this equation, we estimated an operational emission rate of 0.0000432 g/s. Construction and operation were simulated as an 8.46-acre rectangular area source in AERSCREEN, with approximate dimensions of 262- by 131-meters. A release height of three meters was selected to represent the height of stacks of operational equipment and other heavy-duty vehicles, and an initial vertical dimension of one and a half meters was used to simulate instantaneous plume dispersion upon release.

An urban meteorological setting was selected with model-default inputs for wind speed and direction distribution. The population of Gardena was obtained from U.S. 2020 Census data.35 The AERSCREEN model generates maximum reasonable estimates of single-hour DPM concentrations from the Project Site. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (“U.S. EPA”) suggests that the annualized average concentration of an air pollutant be estimated by multiplying the single-hour concentration by 10% in screening procedures.36 According to the IS/MND the nearest sensitive receptors are residential uses located 350 feet, or 107 meters from the Project site (p. 1). However, review of the AERSCREEN output files demonstrates that the MEIR is located approximately 125 meters from the Project site. Thus, the single-hour concentration estimated by AERSCREEN for Project construction is 2.457 µg/m3 DPM at approximately 125 meters downwind. Multiplying this single-hour concentration by 10%, we get an annualized average concentration of 0.2457 µg/m3 for Project construction at the MEIR. For Project operation, the single-hour concentration estimated by AERSCREEN is 0.04921 µg/m3 DPM at approximately 125 meters downwind. Multiplying this single-hour concentration by 10%, we get an annualized average concentration of 0.004921 µg/m3 for Project operation at the MEIR.

We calculated the excess cancer risk to the MEIR using applicable HRA methodologies prescribed by OEHHA, as recommended by SCAQMD.37 Specifically, guidance from OEHHA and the CARB recommends the use of a standard point estimate approach, including high-point estimate (i.e. 95th percentile) breathing rates and age sensitivity factors (“ASF”) in order to account for the increased sensitivity to carcinogens during early-in-life exposure and accurately assess risk for susceptible subpopulations such as children. The residential exposure parameters, such as the daily breathing rates (“BR/BW”), exposure duration (“ED”), age sensitivity factors (“ASF”), fraction of time at home (“FAH”), and exposure frequency (“EF”) utilized for the various age groups in our screening-level HRA are as follows:
35 “Los Angeles.” U.S. Census Bureau, 2020, available at: https://datacommons.org/place/geoId/0644000. 36 “Screening Procedures for Estimating the Air Quality Impact of Stationary Sources Revised.” U.S. EPA, October 1992, available at: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/scram/guidance/guide/EPA-454R-92-019_OCR.pdf. 37 “AB 2588 and Rule 1402 Supplemental Guidelines.” SCAQMD, October 2020, available at:
http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/planning/risk-assessment/ab-2588-supplementalguidelines.pdf?sfvrsn=19, p. 2. 14 Exposure Assumptions for Residential Individual Cancer Risk Age Group
Breathing
Rate
(L/kg-day)38
Age
Sensitivity
Factor39
Exposure
Duration
(years)
Fraction of
Time at
Home40
Exposure
Frequency
(days/year)41
Exposure
Time
(hours/day)
3rd Trimester 361 10 0.25 1 350 24
Infant (0 - 2) 1090 10 2 1 350 24
Child (2 - 16) 572 3 14 1 350 24
Adult (16 - 30) 261 1 14 0.73 350 24
For the inhalation pathway, the procedure requires the incorporation of several discrete variates to effectively quantify dose for each age group. Once determined, contaminant dose is multiplied by the cancer potency factor (“CPF”) in units of inverse dose expressed in milligrams per kilogram per day (mg/kg/day-1
) to derive the cancer risk estimate. Therefore, to assess exposures, we utilized the following dose algorithm:

𝐷𝐷 𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴,𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝 𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎 𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔 = 𝐶𝐶𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎 × 𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 × �
𝐵𝐵
𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵� × 𝐴𝐴 × 𝐶𝐶
where:

DoseAIR = dose by inhalation (mg/kg/day), per age group Cair = concentration of contaminant in air (μg/m3)
EF = exposure frequency (number of days/365 days)
BR/BW = daily breathing rate normalized to body weight (L/kg/day) A = inhalation absorption factor (default = 1)
CF = conversion factor (1x10-6, μg to mg, L to m3)
To calculate the overall cancer risk, we used the following equation for each appropriate age group:

𝐶𝐶 𝑅𝑅 𝑅𝑅𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴 = 𝐷𝐷 𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴 × 𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶 × 𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴 × 𝐹𝐹 ×
𝐸𝐸
𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴
38 “Supplemental Guidelines for Preparing Risk Assessments for the Air Toxics ‘Hot Spots’ Information and Assessment Act.” SCAQMD, October 2020, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/planning/riskassessment/ab-2588-supplemental-guidelines.pdf?sfvrsn=19, p. 19; see also “Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015, available at:
https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf. 39 “Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf, p. 8-5 Table 8.3. 40 “Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf, p. 5-24. 41 “Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf, p. 5-24. 15 where:

DoseAIR = dose by inhalation (mg/kg/day), per age group CPF = cancer potency factor, chemical-specific (mg/kg/day)-1 ASF = age sensitivity factor, per age group
FAH = fraction of time at home, per age group (for residential receptors only) ED = exposure duration (years)
AT = averaging time period over which exposure duration is averaged (always 70 years) Consistent with the 514-day construction schedule, the annualized average concentration for construction was used for the entire third trimester of pregnancy (0.25 years), and the first 1.16 years of the infantile stage of life (0 – 2 years). The annualized average concentration for operation was used for the remainder of the 30-year exposure period, which makes up the latter 0.84 years of the infantile stage of life, as well as the entire child (2 – 16) and adult (16 – 30 years) stages of life. The results of our calculations are shown in the table below.

The Maximally Exposed Individual at an Existing Residential Receptor Age Group Emissions Source Duration (years) Concentration (ug/m3) Cancer Risk
3rd Trimester Construction 0.25 0.2457 3.34E-06
Construction 1.16 0.2457 4.67E-05
Operation 0.84 0.0049 6.80E-07
Infant (0 - 2) Total 2 4.74E-05
Child (2 - 16) Operation 14 0.0049 1.78E-06
Adult (16 - 30) Operation 14 0.0049 1.98E-07
Lifetime 30 5.27E-05
As demonstrated in the table above, the excess cancer risks for the 3rd trimester of pregnancy, infants, children, and adults at the MEIR located approximately 125 meters away, over the course of Project construction and operation, are approximately 3.34, 47.4, 1.78, and 0.198 in one million, respectively.

The excess cancer risk over the course of a residential lifetime (30 years) is approximately 52.7 in one million. The infant and lifetime cancer risks exceed the SCAQMD threshold of 10 in one million, thus resulting in a potentially significant impact not previously addressed or identified by the IS/MND.

Our analysis represents a screening-level HRA, which is known to be conservative and tends to err on the side of health protection. The purpose of the screening-level HRA is to demonstrate the potential link between Project-generated emissions and adverse health risk impacts. According to the U.S. EPA:
16 “EPA’s Exposure Assessment Guidelines recommend completing exposure assessments iteratively using a tiered approach to ‘strike a balance between the costs of adding detail and refinement to an assessment and the benefits associated with that additional refinement’ (U.S.

EPA, 1992).

In other words, an assessment using basic tools (e.g., simple exposure calculations, default values, rules of thumb, conservative assumptions) can be conducted as the first phase (or tier) of the overall assessment (i.e., a screening-level assessment).

The exposure assessor or risk manager can then determine whether the results of the screeninglevel assessment warrant further evaluation through refinements of the input data and exposure assumptions or by using more advanced models.” As demonstrated above, screening-level analyses warrant further evaluation in a refined modeling approach. Thus, as our screening-level HRA demonstrates that construction and operation of the Project could result in a potentially significant health risk impact, an EIR should be prepared to include a refined health risk analysis which adequately and accurately evaluates health risk impacts associated with both Project construction and operation.

Mitigation
Feasible Mitigation Measures Available to Reduce Emissions The IS/MND’s analysis demonstrates that the Project would result in potentially significant air quality and health risk impacts that should be mitigated further. In an effort to reduce the Project’s emissions, we identified several mitigation measures that are applicable to the proposed Project. Feasible mitigation measures can be found in the Department of Justice Warehouse Project Best Practices document.42 Therefore, to reduce the Project’s emissions, consideration of the following measures should be made:
• Requiring off-road construction equipment to be zero-emission, where available, and all dieselfueled off-road construction equipment, to be equipped with CARB Tier IV-compliant engines or better, and including this requirement in applicable bid documents, purchase orders, and contracts, with successful contractors demonstrating the ability to supply the compliant construction equipment for use prior to any ground-disturbing and construction activities. • Prohibiting off-road diesel-powered equipment from being in the “on” position for more than 10 hours per day.
• Requiring on-road heavy-duty haul trucks to be model year 2010 or newer if diesel-fueled. • Providing electrical hook ups to the power grid, rather than use of diesel-fueled generators, for electric construction tools, such as saws, drills and compressors, and using electric tools whenever feasible.
• Limiting the amount of daily grading disturbance area. 42 “Warehouse Projects: Best Practices and Mitigation Measures to Comply with the California Environmental Quality Act.” State of California Department of Justice. 17 • Prohibiting grading on days with an Air Quality Index forecast of greater than 100 for particulates or ozone for the project area.
• Forbidding idling of heavy equipment for more than two minutes. • Keeping onsite and furnishing to the lead agency or other regulators upon request, all equipment maintenance records and data sheets, including design specifications and emission control tier classifications.
• Conducting an on-site inspection to verify compliance with construction mitigation and to identify other opportunities to further reduce construction impacts. • Using paints, architectural coatings, and industrial maintenance coatings that have volatile organic compound levels of less than 10 g/L.
• Providing information on transit and ridesharing programs and services to construction employees.
• Providing meal options onsite or shuttles between the facility and nearby meal destinations for construction employees.
• Requiring that all facility-owned and operated fleet equipment with a gross vehicle weight rating greater than 14,000 pounds accessing the site meet or exceed 2010 model-year emissions equivalent engine standards as currently defined in California Code of Regulations Title 13, Division 3, Chapter 1, Article 4.5, Section 2025. Facility operators shall maintain records on-site demonstrating compliance with this requirement and shall make records available for inspection by the local jurisdiction, air district, and state upon request. • Requiring all heavy-duty vehicles entering or operated on the project site to be zero-emission beginning in 2030.
• Requiring on-site equipment, such as forklifts and yard trucks, to be electric with the necessary electrical charging stations provided.
• Requiring tenants to use zero-emission light- and medium-duty vehicles as part of business operations.
• Forbidding trucks from idling for more than two minutes and requiring operators to turn off engines when not in use.
• Posting both interior- and exterior-facing signs, including signs directed at all dock and delivery areas, identifying idling restrictions and contact information to report violations to CARB, the air district, and the building manager.
• Installing and maintaining, at the manufacturer’s recommended maintenance intervals, air filtration systems at sensitive receptors within a certain radius of facility for the life of the project.
• Installing and maintaining, at the manufacturer’s recommended maintenance intervals, an air monitoring station proximate to sensitive receptors and the facility for the life of the project, and making the resulting data publicly available in real time. While air monitoring does not mitigate the air quality or greenhouse gas impacts of a facility, it nonetheless benefits the affected community by providing information that can be used to improve air quality or avoid exposure to unhealthy air.
18 • Constructing electric truck charging stations proportional to the number of dock doors at the project.
• Constructing electric plugs for electric transport refrigeration units at every dock door, if the warehouse use could include refrigeration.
• Constructing electric light-duty vehicle charging stations proportional to the number of parking spaces at the project.
• Installing solar photovoltaic systems on the project site of a specified electrical generation capacity, such as equal to the building’s projected energy needs. • Requiring all stand-by emergency generators to be powered by a non-diesel fuel. • Requiring facility operators to train managers and employees on efficient scheduling and load management to eliminate unnecessary queuing and idling of trucks. • Requiring operators to establish and promote a rideshare program that discourages singleoccupancy vehicle trips and provides financial incentives for alternate modes of transportation, including carpooling, public transit, and biking.
• Meeting CalGreen Tier 2 green building standards, including all provisions related to designated parking for clean air vehicles, electric vehicle charging, and bicycle parking. • Achieving certification of compliance with LEED green building standards. • Providing meal options onsite or shuttles between the facility and nearby meal destinations. • Posting signs at every truck exit driveway providing directional information to the truck route. • Improving and maintaining vegetation and tree canopy for residents in and around the project area.
• Requiring that every tenant train its staff in charge of keeping vehicle records in diesel technologies and compliance with CARB regulations, by attending CARB-approved courses. Also require facility operators to maintain records on-site demonstrating compliance and make records available for inspection by the local jurisdiction, air district, and state upon request. • Requiring tenants to enroll in the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s SmartWay program, and requiring tenants to use carriers that are SmartWay carriers. • Providing tenants with information on incentive programs, such as the Carl Moyer Program and Voucher Incentive Program, to upgrade their fleets.

These measures offer a cost-effective, feasible way to incorporate lower-emitting design features into the proposed Project, which subsequently, reduce emissions released during Project construction and operation. An EIR should be prepared to include all feasible mitigation measures, as well as include updated air quality and health risk analyses to ensure that the necessary mitigation measures are implemented to reduce emissions to below thresholds. The EIR should also demonstrate a commitment to the implementation of these measures prior to Project approval, to ensure that the Project’s significant emissions are reduced to the maximum extent possible.

Disclaimer
SWAPE has received limited discovery regarding this project. Additional information may become available in the future; thus, we retain the right to revise or amend this report when additional information becomes available. Our professional services have been performed using that degree of 19 care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable environmental consultants practicing in this or similar localities at the time of service. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the scope of work, work methodologies and protocols, site conditions, analytical testing results, and findings presented. This report reflects efforts which were limited to information that was reasonably accessible at the time of the work, and may contain informational gaps, inconsistencies, or otherwise be incomplete due to the unavailability or uncertainty of information obtained or provided by third parties.

Sincerely,
Matt Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg.

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D.

Attachment A: Updated CalEEMod Output Files
Attachment B: Health Risk Calculations
Attachment C: AERSCREEN Output Files
Attachment D: Matt Hagemann CV
Attachment E: Paul Rosenfeld CV
Hitco Proposed
Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
Project Characteristics - Consistent with the IS/MND's model.

Land Use - Consistent with the IS/MND's model.

Construction Phase - See SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Change to Individual Construction Phase Length." Grading - See SWAPE comments on "Unsubstantiated Reduction to Acres of Grading Value" and "Failure to Include Material Export." Demolition - See SWAPE comment on "Failure to Model All Required Demolition." Vehicle Trips - Consistent with the IS/MND's model.

Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Consistent with the IS/MND's model.

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population General Office Building 10.00 1000sqft 0.23 10,000.00 0 Manufacturing 180.86 1000sqft 4.15 180,860.00 0
Parking Lot 4.08 Acre 4.08 177,724.80 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
8 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 33

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Southern California Edison
Operational Year 2024
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
390.98 CH4 Intensity 0.033
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.004
(lb/MWhr)
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 34 Date: 11/8/2022 4:02 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment A

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 17,721.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 2.21 10.84
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 6.42 4.75
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 0.70 10.84
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.09 4.75
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 9.74 10.84
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 3.93 4.75
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 34 Date: 11/8/2022 4:02 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2023 0.2817 2.5829 2.8640 7.5000e0030.5679 0.1013 0.6693 0.1751 0.0950 0.2701 0.0000 684.9136 684.9136 0.0947 0.0368 698.2317 2024 0.9477 0.2706 0.3985 8.2000e0040.0257 0.0117 0.0374 6.9100e0030.0109 0.0178 0.0000 73.8110 73.8110 0.0129 1.9700e00374.7203 Maximum 0.9477 2.5829 2.8640 7.5000e0030.5679 0.1013 0.6693 0.1751 0.0950 0.2701 0.0000 684.9136 684.9136 0.0947 0.0368 698.2317 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2023 0.2817 2.5829 2.8640 7.5000e0030.5679 0.1013 0.6693 0.1751 0.0950 0.2701 0.0000 684.9133 684.9133 0.0947 0.0368 698.2313 2024 0.9477 0.2706 0.3985 8.2000e0040.0257 0.0117 0.0374 6.9100e0030.0109 0.0178 0.0000 73.8109 73.8109 0.0129 1.9700e00374.7202 Maximum 0.9477 2.5829 2.8640 7.5000e0030.5679 0.1013 0.6693 0.1751 0.0950 0.2701 0.0000 684.9133 684.9133 0.0947 0.0368 698.2313 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 34 Date: 11/8/2022 4:02 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 1-2-2023 4-1-2023 0.9619 0.9619
2 4-2-2023 7-1-2023 0.6229 0.6229
3 7-2-2023 10-1-2023 0.6298 0.6298
4 10-2-2023 1-1-2024 0.6352 0.6352
5 1-2-2024 4-1-2024 1.1991 1.1991
Highest 1.1991 1.1991

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 0.7923 2.0000e0052.4800e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0050.0000 4.8400e0034.8400e0031.0000e0050.0000 5.1500e003 Energy 0.0207 0.1885 0.1583 1.1300e0030.0143 0.0143 0.0143 0.0143 0.0000 505.4054 505.4054 0.0293 6.8300e003508.1735 Mobile 0.5876 0.7142 6.5135 0.0147 1.5605 0.0106 1.5711 0.4163 9.8800e0030.4262 0.0000 1,380.263 5 1,380.263
5 0.0886 0.0568 1,399.391
2 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 47.4126 0.0000 47.4126 2.8020 0.0000 117.4627 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 13.8327 102.8310 116.6636 1.4294 0.0346 162.7097 Total 1.4006 0.9027 6.6743 0.0158 1.5605 0.0250 1.5855 0.4163 0.0242 0.4405 61.2453 1,988.504 7 2,049.750
0 4.3493 0.0982 2,187.742
3 Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 34 Date: 11/8/2022 4:02 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 34 Date: 11/8/2022 4:02 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 4 Building Construction Building Construction 3/11/2023 1/26/2024 5 230 5 Paving Paving 1/27/2024 2/23/2024 5 20
6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 2/24/2024 3/22/2024 5 20 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38
Grading Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 286,290; Non-Residential Outdoor: 95,430; Striped Parking Area: 10,663 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 15
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 20
Acres of Paving: 4.08
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 34 Date: 11/8/2022 4:02 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.1460 0.0000 0.1460 0.0221 0.0000 0.0221 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0227 0.2148 0.1964 3.9000e0049.9800e0039.9800e0039.2800e0039.2800e0030.0000 33.9921 33.9921 9.5200e0030.0000 34.2301 Total 0.0227 0.2148 0.1964 3.9000e0040.1460 9.9800e0030.1560 0.0221 9.2800e0030.0314 0.0000 33.9921 33.9921 9.5200e0030.0000 34.2301 Unmitigated Construction On-Site

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Water Exposed Area
Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads
Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 1,349.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 6 15.00 0.00 2,215.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 154.00 60.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 31.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 34 Date: 11/8/2022 4:02 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 1.4200e0030.0928 0.0236 3.9000e0040.0116 5.6000e0040.0122 3.1900e0035.3000e0043.7200e0030.0000 39.3415 39.3415 2.1700e0036.2500e00341.2575 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.8000e0043.8000e0045.1200e0031.0000e0051.6400e0031.0000e0051.6500e0034.4000e0041.0000e0054.5000e0040.0000 1.3248 1.3248 3.0000e0053.0000e0051.3358 Total 1.9000e0030.0931 0.0287 4.0000e0040.0133 5.7000e0040.0138 3.6300e0035.4000e0044.1700e0030.0000 40.6663 40.6663 2.2000e0036.2800e00342.5932 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.1460 0.0000 0.1460 0.0221 0.0000 0.0221 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0227 0.2148 0.1964 3.9000e0049.9800e0039.9800e0039.2800e0039.2800e0030.0000 33.9920 33.9920 9.5200e0030.0000 34.2300 Total 0.0227 0.2148 0.1964 3.9000e0040.1460 9.9800e0030.1560 0.0221 9.2800e0030.0314 0.0000 33.9920 33.9920 9.5200e0030.0000 34.2300 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 34 Date: 11/8/2022 4:02 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.3 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.9000e0042.3000e0043.0700e0031.0000e0059.9000e0041.0000e0059.9000e0042.6000e0041.0000e0052.7000e0040.0000 0.7949 0.7949 2.0000e0052.0000e0050.8015 Total 2.9000e0042.3000e0043.0700e0031.0000e0059.9000e0041.0000e0059.9000e0042.6000e0041.0000e0052.7000e0040.0000 0.7949 0.7949 2.0000e0052.0000e0050.8015 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0983 0.0000 0.0983 0.0505 0.0000 0.0505 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0133 0.1376 0.0912 1.9000e0046.3300e0036.3300e0035.8200e0035.8200e0030.0000 16.7253 16.7253 5.4100e0030.0000 16.8606 Total 0.0133 0.1376 0.0912 1.9000e0040.0983 6.3300e0030.1046 0.0505 5.8200e0030.0563 0.0000 16.7253 16.7253 5.4100e0030.0000 16.8606 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 34 Date: 11/8/2022 4:02 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0718 0.0000 0.0718 0.0344 0.0000 0.0344 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0171 0.1794 0.1475 3.0000e0047.7500e0037.7500e0037.1300e0037.1300e0030.0000 26.0606 26.0606 8.4300e0030.0000 26.2713 Total 0.0171 0.1794 0.1475 3.0000e0040.0718 7.7500e0030.0796 0.0344 7.1300e0030.0415 0.0000 26.0606 26.0606 8.4300e0030.0000 26.2713 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 34 Date: 11/8/2022 4:02 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 2.3400e0030.1523 0.0388 6.5000e0040.0191 9.1000e0040.0200 5.2300e0038.7000e0046.1100e0030.0000 64.5971 64.5971 3.5600e0030.0103 67.7430 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.8000e0043.8000e0045.1200e0031.0000e0051.6400e0031.0000e0051.6500e0034.4000e0041.0000e0054.5000e0040.0000 1.3248 1.3248 3.0000e0053.0000e0051.3358 Total 2.8200e0030.1527 0.0439 6.6000e0040.0207 9.2000e0040.0216 5.6700e0038.8000e0046.5600e0030.0000 65.9218 65.9218 3.5900e0030.0103 69.0787 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0718 0.0000 0.0718 0.0344 0.0000 0.0344 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0171 0.1794 0.1475 3.0000e0047.7500e0037.7500e0037.1300e0037.1300e0030.0000 26.0606 26.0606 8.4300e0030.0000 26.2713 Total 0.0171 0.1794 0.1475 3.0000e0040.0718 7.7500e0030.0796 0.0344 7.1300e0030.0415 0.0000 26.0606 26.0606 8.4300e0030.0000 26.2713 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 34 Date: 11/8/2022 4:02 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 2.3400e0030.1523 0.0388 6.5000e0040.0191 9.1000e0040.0200 5.2300e0038.7000e0046.1100e0030.0000 64.5971 64.5971 3.5600e0030.0103 67.7430 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.8000e0043.8000e0045.1200e0031.0000e0051.6400e0031.0000e0051.6500e0034.4000e0041.0000e0054.5000e0040.0000 1.3248 1.3248 3.0000e0053.0000e0051.3358 Total 2.8200e0030.1527 0.0439 6.6000e0040.0207 9.2000e0040.0216 5.6700e0038.8000e0046.5600e0030.0000 65.9218 65.9218 3.5900e0030.0103 69.0787 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1651 1.5104 1.7056 2.8300e0030.0735 0.0735 0.0691 0.0691 0.0000 243.3950 243.3950 0.0579 0.0000 244.8425 Total 0.1651 1.5104 1.7056 2.8300e0030.0735 0.0735 0.0691 0.0691 0.0000 243.3950 243.3950 0.0579 0.0000 244.8425 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 34 Date: 11/8/2022 4:02 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 7.1200e0030.2539 0.0950 1.1700e0030.0397 1.2200e0030.0409 0.0115 1.1700e0030.0126 0.0000 114.5480 114.5480 3.8300e0030.0165 119.5563 Worker 0.0513 0.0408 0.5524 1.5400e0030.1772 1.0900e0030.1783 0.0471 1.0000e0030.0481 0.0000 142.8096 142.8096 3.7500e0033.6700e003143.9975 Total 0.0585 0.2947 0.6475 2.7100e0030.2169 2.3100e0030.2192 0.0585 2.1700e0030.0607 0.0000 257.3576 257.3576 7.5800e0030.0202 263.5538 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1651 1.5104 1.7056 2.8300e0030.0735 0.0735 0.0691 0.0691 0.0000 243.3947 243.3947 0.0579 0.0000 244.8422 Total 0.1651 1.5104 1.7056 2.8300e0030.0735 0.0735 0.0691 0.0691 0.0000 243.3947 243.3947 0.0579 0.0000 244.8422 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 34 Date: 11/8/2022 4:02 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0147 0.1344 0.1617 2.7000e0046.1300e0036.1300e0035.7700e0035.7700e0030.0000 23.1849 23.1849 5.4800e0030.0000 23.3220 Total 0.0147 0.1344 0.1617 2.7000e0046.1300e0036.1300e0035.7700e0035.7700e0030.0000 23.1849 23.1849 5.4800e0030.0000 23.3220 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 34 Date: 11/8/2022 4:02 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 6.6000e0040.0242 8.8600e0031.1000e0043.7800e0031.2000e0043.9000e0031.0900e0031.1000e0041.2000e0030.0000 10.7457 10.7457 3.7000e0041.5500e00311.2161 Worker 4.5600e0033.4700e0030.0490 1.4000e0040.0169 1.0000e0040.0170 4.4800e0039.0000e0054.5700e0030.0000 13.3215 13.3215 3.2000e0043.3000e00413.4264 Total 5.2200e0030.0277 0.0579 2.5000e0040.0207 2.2000e0040.0209 5.5700e0032.0000e0045.7700e0030.0000 24.0671 24.0671 6.9000e0041.8800e00324.6425 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0147 0.1344 0.1617 2.7000e0046.1300e0036.1300e0035.7700e0035.7700e0030.0000 23.1849 23.1849 5.4800e0030.0000 23.3220 Total 0.0147 0.1344 0.1617 2.7000e0046.1300e0036.1300e0035.7700e0035.7700e0030.0000 23.1849 23.1849 5.4800e0030.0000 23.3220 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 34 Date: 11/8/2022 4:02 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 9.8800e0030.0953 0.1463 2.3000e0044.6900e0034.6900e0034.3100e0034.3100e0030.0000 20.0265 20.0265 6.4800e0030.0000 20.1885 Paving 5.3400e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0152 0.0953 0.1463 2.3000e0044.6900e0034.6900e0034.3100e0034.3100e0030.0000 20.0265 20.0265 6.4800e0030.0000 20.1885 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 34 Date: 11/8/2022 4:02 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.4000e0043.4000e0044.7700e0031.0000e0051.6400e0031.0000e0051.6500e0034.4000e0041.0000e0054.5000e0040.0000 1.2976 1.2976 3.0000e0053.0000e0051.3078 Total 4.4000e0043.4000e0044.7700e0031.0000e0051.6400e0031.0000e0051.6500e0034.4000e0041.0000e0054.5000e0040.0000 1.2976 1.2976 3.0000e0053.0000e0051.3078 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 9.8800e0030.0953 0.1463 2.3000e0044.6900e0034.6900e0034.3100e0034.3100e0030.0000 20.0265 20.0265 6.4800e0030.0000 20.1884 Paving 5.3400e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0152 0.0953 0.1463 2.3000e0044.6900e0034.6900e0034.3100e0034.3100e0030.0000 20.0265 20.0265 6.4800e0030.0000 20.1884 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 34 Date: 11/8/2022 4:02 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 9.2000e0047.0000e0049.8600e0033.0000e0053.4000e0032.0000e0053.4200e0039.0000e0042.0000e0059.2000e0040.0000 2.6816 2.6816 7.0000e0057.0000e0052.7027 Total 9.2000e0047.0000e0049.8600e0033.0000e0053.4000e0032.0000e0053.4200e0039.0000e0042.0000e0059.2000e0040.0000 2.6816 2.6816 7.0000e0057.0000e0052.7027 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 0.9094 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.8100e0030.0122 0.0181 3.0000e0056.1000e0046.1000e0046.1000e0046.1000e0040.0000 2.5533 2.5533 1.4000e0040.0000 2.5568 Total 0.9112 0.0122 0.0181 3.0000e0056.1000e0046.1000e0046.1000e0046.1000e0040.0000 2.5533 2.5533 1.4000e0040.0000 2.5568 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 34 Date: 11/8/2022 4:02 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 34 Date: 11/8/2022 4:02 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.5876 0.7142 6.5135 0.0147 1.5605 0.0106 1.5711 0.4163 9.8800e0030.4262 0.0000 1,380.263 5 1,380.263
5 0.0886 0.0568 1,399.391
2 Unmitigated 0.5876 0.7142 6.5135 0.0147 1.5605 0.0106 1.5711 0.4163 9.8800e0030.4262 0.0000 1,380.263 5 1,380.263
5 0.0886 0.0568 1,399.391
2 4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
General Office Building 108.40 108.40 108.40 349,206 349,206 Manufacturing 859.09 859.09 859.09 3,804,267 3,804,267
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 967.49 967.49 967.49 4,153,473 4,153,473
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by General Office Building 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 77 19 4 Manufacturing 16.60 8.40 6.90 59.00 28.00 13.00 92 5 3
Parking Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH General Office Building 0.542464 0.063735 0.188241 0.126899 0.023249 0.006239 0.010717 0.008079 0.000923 0.000604 0.024795 0.000702 0.003352 Manufacturing 0.542464 0.063735 0.188241 0.126899 0.023249 0.006239 0.010717 0.008079 0.000923 0.000604 0.024795 0.000702 0.003352 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 34 Date: 11/8/2022 4:02 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Parking Lot 0.542464 0.063735 0.188241 0.126899 0.023249 0.006239 0.010717 0.008079 0.000923 0.000604 0.024795 0.000702 0.003352

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 300.2134 300.2134 0.0253 3.0700e003301.7621 Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 300.2134 300.2134 0.0253 3.0700e003301.7621 NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0207 0.1885 0.1583 1.1300e0030.0143 0.0143 0.0143 0.0143 0.0000 205.1920 205.1920 3.9300e0033.7600e003206.4114 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.0207 0.1885 0.1583 1.1300e0030.0143 0.0143 0.0143 0.0143 0.0000 205.1920 205.1920 3.9300e0033.7600e003206.4114

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 34 Date: 11/8/2022 4:02 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

0.0203 0.1841 0.1546 1.1000e0030.0140 0.0140 0.0140 0.0140 0.0000 200.3626 200.3626 3.8400e0033.6700e003201.5533 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0207 0.1885 0.1583 1.1300e0030.0143 0.0143 0.0143 0.0143 0.0000 205.1920 205.1920 3.9300e0033.7600e003206.4114 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 34 Date: 11/8/2022 4:02 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

0.0203 0.1841 0.1546 1.1000e0030.0140 0.0140 0.0140 0.0140 0.0000 200.3626 200.3626 3.8400e0033.6700e003201.5533 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0207 0.1885 0.1583 1.1300e0030.0143 0.0143 0.0143 0.0143 0.0000 205.1920 205.1920 3.9300e0033.7600e003206.4114 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 34 Date: 11/8/2022 4:02 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
General Office
Building
134900 23.9239 2.0200e0032.4000e00424.0473
Manufacturing 1.49571e
+006
265.2579 0.0224 2.7100e003266.6263
Parking Lot 62203.7 11.0316 9.3000e0041.1000e00411.0885 Total 300.2134 0.0253 3.0600e003301.7621
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 27 of 34 Date: 11/8/2022 4:02 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.7923 2.0000e0052.4800e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0050.0000 4.8400e0034.8400e0031.0000e0050.0000 5.1500e003 Unmitigated 0.7923 2.0000e0052.4800e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0050.0000 4.8400e0034.8400e0031.0000e0050.0000 5.1500e003

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.0909 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.7012 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 2.3000e0042.0000e0052.4800e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0050.0000 4.8400e0034.8400e0031.0000e0050.0000 5.1500e003 Total 0.7923 2.0000e0052.4800e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0050.0000 4.8400e0034.8400e0031.0000e0050.0000 5.1500e003 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 28 of 34 Date: 11/8/2022 4:02 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

0.0909 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.7012 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 2.3000e0042.0000e0052.4800e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0050.0000 4.8400e0034.8400e0031.0000e0050.0000 5.1500e003 Total 0.7923 2.0000e0052.4800e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0050.0000 4.8400e0034.8400e0031.0000e0050.0000 5.1500e003 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 29 of 34 Date: 11/8/2022 4:02 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 116.6636 1.4294 0.0346 162.7097
Unmitigated 116.6636 1.4294 0.0346 162.7097

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
General Office
Building

1.77734 /

1.08934

6.8145 0.0584 1.4300e0038.7021
Manufacturing 41.8239 /
0 109.8492 1.3710 0.0332 154.0077
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 116.6636 1.4294 0.0346 162.7097
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 30 of 34 Date: 11/8/2022 4:02 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
General Office
Building

1.77734 /

1.08934

6.8145 0.0584 1.4300e0038.7021
Manufacturing 41.8239 /
0 109.8492 1.3710 0.0332 154.0077
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 116.6636 1.4294 0.0346 162.7097
Mitigated

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 31 of 34 Date: 11/8/2022 4:02 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 47.4126 2.8020 0.0000 117.4627
Unmitigated 47.4126 2.8020 0.0000 117.4627
Category/Year

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
General Office
Building

9.3 1.8878 0.1116 0.0000 4.6770
Manufacturing 224.27 45.5248 2.6904 0.0000 112.7857
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 47.4126 2.8020 0.0000 117.4627
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 32 of 34 Date: 11/8/2022 4:02 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
General Office
Building

9.3 1.8878 0.1116 0.0000 4.6770
Manufacturing 224.27 45.5248 2.6904 0.0000 112.7857
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 47.4126 2.8020 0.0000 117.4627
Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

11.0 Vegetation
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 34 of 34 Date: 11/8/2022 4:02 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Hitco Proposed
Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
Project Characteristics - Consistent with the IS/MND's model.

Land Use - Consistent with the IS/MND's model.

Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Consistent with the IS/MND's model.

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
8 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 33

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Southern California Edison
Operational Year 2024
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
390.98 CH4 Intensity 0.033
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.004
(lb/MWhr)
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 28 Date: 11/8/2022 3:47 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 17,721.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 2.21 10.84
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 6.42 4.75
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 0.70 10.84
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.09 4.75
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 9.74 10.84
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 3.93 4.75
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 28 Date: 11/8/2022 3:47 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2023 2.7171 32.4211 22.7167 0.0959 19.8582 1.2672 21.1254 10.1558 1.1659 11.3217 0.0000 10,142.04 36 10,142.04
36 1.3251 1.1337 10,513.01
55 2024 91.2080 16.0585 22.2344 0.0528 2.1057 0.6349 2.7406 0.5672 0.5972 1.1644 0.0000 5,266.624 6 5,266.624
6 0.7174 0.2034 5,344.237
9 Maximum 91.2080 32.4211 22.7167 0.0959 19.8582 1.2672 21.1254 10.1558 1.1659 11.3217 0.0000 10,142.04 36 10,142.04
36 1.3251 1.1337 10,513.01
55 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2023 2.7171 32.4211 22.7167 0.0959 19.8582 1.2672 21.1254 10.1558 1.1659 11.3217 0.0000 10,142.04 36 10,142.04
36 1.3251 1.1337 10,513.01
55 2024 91.2080 16.0585 22.2344 0.0528 2.1057 0.6349 2.7406 0.5672 0.5972 1.1644 0.0000 5,266.624 6 5,266.624
6 0.7174 0.2034 5,344.237
9 Maximum 91.2080 32.4211 22.7167 0.0959 19.8582 1.2672 21.1254 10.1558 1.1659 11.3217 0.0000 10,142.04 36 10,142.04
36 1.3251 1.1337 10,513.01
55 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 28 Date: 11/8/2022 3:47 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 28 Date: 11/8/2022 3:47 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 4.3421 1.8000e0040.0199 0.0000 7.0000e0057.0000e0057.0000e0057.0000e0050.0427 0.0427 1.1000e0040.0455 Energy 0.1136 1.0328 0.8676 6.2000e0030.0785 0.0785 0.0785 0.0785 1,239.372 6 1,239.372
6 0.0238 0.0227 1,246.737
6 Mobile 3.3220 3.5779 36.4729 0.0833 8.7445 0.0585 8.8031 2.3293 0.0544 2.3836 8,640.133 7 8,640.133
7 0.5272 0.3271 8,750.788
9 Total 7.7777 4.6109 37.3603 0.0895 8.7445 0.1371 8.8816 2.3293 0.1329 2.4622 9,879.549 0 9,879.549
0 0.5511 0.3498 9,997.571
9 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 4.3421 1.8000e0040.0199 0.0000 7.0000e0057.0000e0057.0000e0057.0000e0050.0427 0.0427 1.1000e0040.0455 Energy 0.1136 1.0328 0.8676 6.2000e0030.0785 0.0785 0.0785 0.0785 1,239.372 6 1,239.372
6 0.0238 0.0227 1,246.737
6 Mobile 3.3220 3.5779 36.4729 0.0833 8.7445 0.0585 8.8031 2.3293 0.0544 2.3836 8,640.133 7 8,640.133
7 0.5272 0.3271 8,750.788
9 Total 7.7777 4.6109 37.3603 0.0895 8.7445 0.1371 8.8816 2.3293 0.1329 2.4622 9,879.549 0 9,879.549
0 0.5511 0.3498 9,997.571
9 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 28 Date: 11/8/2022 3:47 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 1/2/2023 1/27/2023 5 20
2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 1/28/2023 2/10/2023 5 10 3 Grading Grading 2/11/2023 3/10/2023 5 20
4 Building Construction Building Construction 3/11/2023 1/26/2024 5 230 5 Paving Paving 1/27/2024 2/23/2024 5 20
6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 2/24/2024 3/22/2024 5 20 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38
Grading Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 286,290; Non-Residential Outdoor: 95,430; Striped Parking Area: 10,663 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 15
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 20
Acres of Paving: 4.08
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 28 Date: 11/8/2022 3:47 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Water Exposed Area
Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 1,349.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 6 15.00 0.00 2,215.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 154.00 60.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 31.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 28 Date: 11/8/2022 3:47 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 14.5995 0.0000 14.5995 2.2105 0.0000 2.2105 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.2691 21.4844 19.6434 0.0388 0.9975 0.9975 0.9280 0.9280 3,746.984 0 3,746.984
0 1.0494 3,773.218
3 Total 2.2691 21.4844 19.6434 0.0388 14.5995 0.9975 15.5970 2.2105 0.9280 3.1385 3,746.984 0 3,746.984
0 1.0494 3,773.218
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.1463 8.8015 2.3492 0.0395 1.1807 0.0555 1.2362 0.3237 0.0531 0.3768 4,334.742 4 4,334.742
4 0.2389 0.6884 4,545.843
3 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0480 0.0335 0.5436 1.4800e0030.1677 1.0100e0030.1687 0.0445 9.3000e0040.0454 151.8919 151.8919 3.7800e0033.4600e003153.0181 Total 0.1943 8.8350 2.8928 0.0409 1.3483 0.0565 1.4049 0.3682 0.0540 0.4222 4,486.634 3 4,486.634
3 0.2427 0.6918 4,698.861
4 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 28 Date: 11/8/2022 3:47 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 14.5995 0.0000 14.5995 2.2105 0.0000 2.2105 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.2691 21.4844 19.6434 0.0388 0.9975 0.9975 0.9280 0.9280 0.0000 3,746.984 0 3,746.984
0 1.0494 3,773.218
3 Total 2.2691 21.4844 19.6434 0.0388 14.5995 0.9975 15.5970 2.2105 0.9280 3.1385 0.0000 3,746.984 0 3,746.984
0 1.0494 3,773.218
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.1463 8.8015 2.3492 0.0395 1.1807 0.0555 1.2362 0.3237 0.0531 0.3768 4,334.742 4 4,334.742
4 0.2389 0.6884 4,545.843
3 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0480 0.0335 0.5436 1.4800e0030.1677 1.0100e0030.1687 0.0445 9.3000e0040.0454 151.8919 151.8919 3.7800e0033.4600e003153.0181 Total 0.1943 8.8350 2.8928 0.0409 1.3483 0.0565 1.4049 0.3682 0.0540 0.4222 4,486.634 3 4,486.634
3 0.2427 0.6918 4,698.861
4 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 28 Date: 11/8/2022 3:47 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.3 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 19.6570 0.0000 19.6570 10.1025 0.0000 10.1025 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.6595 27.5242 18.2443 0.0381 1.2660 1.2660 1.1647 1.1647 3,687.308 1 3,687.308
1 1.1926 3,717.121
9 Total 2.6595 27.5242 18.2443 0.0381 19.6570 1.2660 20.9230 10.1025 1.1647 11.2672 3,687.308 1 3,687.308
1 1.1926 3,717.121
9 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0576 0.0402 0.6523 1.7800e0030.2012 1.2100e0030.2024 0.0534 1.1200e0030.0545 182.2703 182.2703 4.5400e0034.1500e003183.6218 Total 0.0576 0.0402 0.6523 1.7800e0030.2012 1.2100e0030.2024 0.0534 1.1200e0030.0545 182.2703 182.2703 4.5400e0034.1500e003183.6218 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 28 Date: 11/8/2022 3:47 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.3 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 19.6570 0.0000 19.6570 10.1025 0.0000 10.1025 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.6595 27.5242 18.2443 0.0381 1.2660 1.2660 1.1647 1.1647 0.0000 3,687.308 1 3,687.308
1 1.1926 3,717.121
9 Total 2.6595 27.5242 18.2443 0.0381 19.6570 1.2660 20.9230 10.1025 1.1647 11.2672 0.0000 3,687.308 1 3,687.308
1 1.1926 3,717.121
9 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0576 0.0402 0.6523 1.7800e0030.2012 1.2100e0030.2024 0.0534 1.1200e0030.0545 182.2703 182.2703 4.5400e0034.1500e003183.6218 Total 0.0576 0.0402 0.6523 1.7800e0030.2012 1.2100e0030.2024 0.0534 1.1200e0030.0545 182.2703 182.2703 4.5400e0034.1500e003183.6218 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 28 Date: 11/8/2022 3:47 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 7.1828 0.0000 7.1828 3.4399 0.0000 3.4399 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.7109 17.9359 14.7507 0.0297 0.7749 0.7749 0.7129 0.7129 2,872.691 0 2,872.691
0 0.9291 2,895.918
2 Total 1.7109 17.9359 14.7507 0.0297 7.1828 0.7749 7.9577 3.4399 0.7129 4.1528 2,872.691 0 2,872.691
0 0.9291 2,895.918
2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.2402 14.4518 3.8573 0.0648 1.9386 0.0912 2.0298 0.5315 0.0872 0.6187 7,117.460 7 7,117.460
7 0.3923 1.1302 7,464.079
2 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0480 0.0335 0.5436 1.4800e0030.1677 1.0100e0030.1687 0.0445 9.3000e0040.0454 151.8919 151.8919 3.7800e0033.4600e003153.0181 Total 0.2882 14.4852 4.4008 0.0663 2.1063 0.0922 2.1984 0.5760 0.0881 0.6641 7,269.352 6 7,269.352
6 0.3960 1.1337 7,617.097
4 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 28 Date: 11/8/2022 3:47 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 7.1828 0.0000 7.1828 3.4399 0.0000 3.4399 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.7109 17.9359 14.7507 0.0297 0.7749 0.7749 0.7129 0.7129 0.0000 2,872.691 0 2,872.691
0 0.9291 2,895.918
2 Total 1.7109 17.9359 14.7507 0.0297 7.1828 0.7749 7.9577 3.4399 0.7129 4.1528 0.0000 2,872.691 0 2,872.691
0 0.9291 2,895.918
2 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.2402 14.4518 3.8573 0.0648 1.9386 0.0912 2.0298 0.5315 0.0872 0.6187 7,117.460 7 7,117.460
7 0.3923 1.1302 7,464.079
2 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0480 0.0335 0.5436 1.4800e0030.1677 1.0100e0030.1687 0.0445 9.3000e0040.0454 151.8919 151.8919 3.7800e0033.4600e003153.0181 Total 0.2882 14.4852 4.4008 0.0663 2.1063 0.0922 2.1984 0.5760 0.0881 0.6641 7,269.352 6 7,269.352
6 0.3960 1.1337 7,617.097
4 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 28 Date: 11/8/2022 3:47 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0691 2.3030 0.8922 0.0112 0.3843 0.0116 0.3959 0.1107 0.0111 0.1217 1,201.694 8 1,201.694
8 0.0403 0.1728 1,254.186
7 Worker 0.4931 0.3438 5.5805 0.0152 1.7214 0.0104 1.7317 0.4565 9.5600e0030.4661 1,559.423 7 1,559.423
7 0.0388 0.0355 1,570.986
1 Total 0.5622 2.6468 6.4727 0.0264 2.1057 0.0220 2.1276 0.5672 0.0206 0.5878 2,761.118 5 2,761.118
5 0.0791 0.2083 2,825.172
8 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 28 Date: 11/8/2022 3:47 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0691 2.3030 0.8922 0.0112 0.3843 0.0116 0.3959 0.1107 0.0111 0.1217 1,201.694 8 1,201.694
8 0.0403 0.1728 1,254.186
7 Worker 0.4931 0.3438 5.5805 0.0152 1.7214 0.0104 1.7317 0.4565 9.5600e0030.4661 1,559.423 7 1,559.423
7 0.0388 0.0355 1,570.986
1 Total 0.5622 2.6468 6.4727 0.0264 2.1057 0.0220 2.1276 0.5672 0.0206 0.5878 2,761.118 5 2,761.118
5 0.0791 0.2083 2,825.172
8 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 28 Date: 11/8/2022 3:47 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Total 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0670 2.3077 0.8732 0.0110 0.3843 0.0117 0.3960 0.1107 0.0112 0.1218 1,183.647 6 1,183.647
6 0.0404 0.1704 1,235.424
0 Worker 0.4596 0.3070 5.1944 0.0148 1.7214 9.9600e0031.7313 0.4565 9.1700e0030.4657 1,527.278 0 1,527.278
0 0.0351 0.0331 1,538.006
2 Total 0.5266 2.6147 6.0676 0.0258 2.1057 0.0216 2.1273 0.5672 0.0203 0.5875 2,710.925 7 2,710.925
7 0.0756 0.2034 2,773.430
3 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 28 Date: 11/8/2022 3:47 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 0.0000 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Total 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 0.0000 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0670 2.3077 0.8732 0.0110 0.3843 0.0117 0.3960 0.1107 0.0112 0.1218 1,183.647 6 1,183.647
6 0.0404 0.1704 1,235.424
0 Worker 0.4596 0.3070 5.1944 0.0148 1.7214 9.9600e0031.7313 0.4565 9.1700e0030.4657 1,527.278 0 1,527.278
0 0.0351 0.0331 1,538.006
2 Total 0.5266 2.6147 6.0676 0.0258 2.1057 0.0216 2.1273 0.5672 0.0203 0.5875 2,710.925 7 2,710.925
7 0.0756 0.2034 2,773.430
3 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 28 Date: 11/8/2022 3:47 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Paving 0.5345 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.5226 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0448 0.0299 0.5060 1.4400e0030.1677 9.7000e0040.1686 0.0445 8.9000e0040.0454 148.7609 148.7609 3.4200e0033.2200e003149.8058 Total 0.0448 0.0299 0.5060 1.4400e0030.1677 9.7000e0040.1686 0.0445 8.9000e0040.0454 148.7609 148.7609 3.4200e0033.2200e003149.8058 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 28 Date: 11/8/2022 3:47 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 0.0000 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Paving 0.5345 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.5226 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 0.0000 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0448 0.0299 0.5060 1.4400e0030.1677 9.7000e0040.1686 0.0445 8.9000e0040.0454 148.7609 148.7609 3.4200e0033.2200e003149.8058 Total 0.0448 0.0299 0.5060 1.4400e0030.1677 9.7000e0040.1686 0.0445 8.9000e0040.0454 148.7609 148.7609 3.4200e0033.2200e003149.8058 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 28 Date: 11/8/2022 3:47 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 90.9348 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 91.1155 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0925 0.0618 1.0456 2.9800e0030.3465 2.0100e0030.3485 0.0919 1.8500e0030.0937 307.4391 307.4391 7.0700e0036.6500e003309.5987 Total 0.0925 0.0618 1.0456 2.9800e0030.3465 2.0100e0030.3485 0.0919 1.8500e0030.0937 307.4391 307.4391 7.0700e0036.6500e003309.5987 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 28 Date: 11/8/2022 3:47 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 90.9348 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 91.1155 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0925 0.0618 1.0456 2.9800e0030.3465 2.0100e0030.3485 0.0919 1.8500e0030.0937 307.4391 307.4391 7.0700e0036.6500e003309.5987 Total 0.0925 0.0618 1.0456 2.9800e0030.3465 2.0100e0030.3485 0.0919 1.8500e0030.0937 307.4391 307.4391 7.0700e0036.6500e003309.5987 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 28 Date: 11/8/2022 3:47 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 3.3220 3.5779 36.4729 0.0833 8.7445 0.0585 8.8031 2.3293 0.0544 2.3836 8,640.133 7 8,640.133
7 0.5272 0.3271 8,750.788
9 Unmitigated 3.3220 3.5779 36.4729 0.0833 8.7445 0.0585 8.8031 2.3293 0.0544 2.3836 8,640.133 7 8,640.133
7 0.5272 0.3271 8,750.788
9 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.1136 1.0328 0.8676 6.2000e0030.0785 0.0785 0.0785 0.0785 1,239.372 6 1,239.372
6 0.0238 0.0227 1,246.737
6 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.1136 1.0328 0.8676 6.2000e0030.0785 0.0785 0.0785 0.0785 1,239.372 6 1,239.372
6 0.0238 0.0227 1,246.737
6 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 28 Date: 11/8/2022 3:47 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
General Office
Building
247.945 2.6700e0030.0243 0.0204 1.5000e0041.8500e0031.8500e0031.8500e0031.8500e00329.1700 29.1700 5.6000e0045.3000e00429.3434 Manufacturing 10286.7 0.1109 1.0085 0.8471 6.0500e0030.0767 0.0767 0.0767 0.0767 1,210.202 6 1,210.202
6 0.0232 0.0222 1,217.394
2 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.1136 1.0328 0.8676 6.2000e0030.0785 0.0785 0.0785 0.0785 1,239.372 6 1,239.372
6 0.0238 0.0227 1,246.737
6 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 28 Date: 11/8/2022 3:47 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

0.247945 2.6700e0030.0243 0.0204 1.5000e0041.8500e0031.8500e0031.8500e0031.8500e00329.1700 29.1700 5.6000e0045.3000e00429.3434 Manufacturing 10.2867 0.1109 1.0085 0.8471 6.0500e0030.0767 0.0767 0.0767 0.0767 1,210.202 6 1,210.202
6 0.0232 0.0222 1,217.394
2 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.1136 1.0328 0.8676 6.2000e0030.0785 0.0785 0.0785 0.0785 1,239.372 6 1,239.372
6 0.0238 0.0227 1,246.737
6 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 28 Date: 11/8/2022 3:47 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 4.3421 1.8000e0040.0199 0.0000 7.0000e0057.0000e0057.0000e0057.0000e0050.0427 0.0427 1.1000e0040.0455 Unmitigated 4.3421 1.8000e0040.0199 0.0000 7.0000e0057.0000e0057.0000e0057.0000e0050.0427 0.0427 1.1000e0040.0455

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating

0.4983 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

3.8420 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 1.8300e0031.8000e0040.0199 0.0000 7.0000e0057.0000e0057.0000e0057.0000e0050.0427 0.0427 1.1000e0040.0455 Total 4.3421 1.8000e0040.0199 0.0000 7.0000e0057.0000e0057.0000e0057.0000e0050.0427 0.0427 1.1000e0040.0455 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 26 of 28 Date: 11/8/2022 3:47 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

0.4983 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

3.8420 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 1.8300e0031.8000e0040.0199 0.0000 7.0000e0057.0000e0057.0000e0057.0000e0050.0427 0.0427 1.1000e0040.0455 Total 4.3421 1.8000e0040.0199 0.0000 7.0000e0057.0000e0057.0000e0057.0000e0050.0427 0.0427 1.1000e0040.0455 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 27 of 28 Date: 11/8/2022 3:47 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

11.0 Vegetation

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

Land Use - Consistent with the IS/MND's model.

Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Consistent with the IS/MND's model.

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
8 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 33

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Southern California Edison
Operational Year 2024
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
390.98 CH4 Intensity 0.033
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.004
(lb/MWhr)
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 28 Date: 11/8/2022 4:02 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 17,721.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 2.21 10.84
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 6.42 4.75
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 0.70 10.84
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.09 4.75
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 9.74 10.84
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 3.93 4.75
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 28 Date: 11/8/2022 4:02 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2023 2.7214 33.0617 22.5245 0.0959 19.8582 1.2672 21.1254 10.1558 1.1659 11.3217 0.0000 10,141.53 78 10,141.53
78 1.3244 1.1352 10,512.92
46 2024 91.2153 16.1990 21.8465 0.0520 2.1057 0.6350 2.7407 0.5672 0.5973 1.1645 0.0000 5,188.276 3 5,188.276
3 0.7174 0.2061 5,266.699
2 Maximum 91.2153 33.0617 22.5245 0.0959 19.8582 1.2672 21.1254 10.1558 1.1659 11.3217 0.0000 10,141.53 78 10,141.53
78 1.3244 1.1352 10,512.92
46 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2023 2.7214 33.0617 22.5245 0.0959 19.8582 1.2672 21.1254 10.1558 1.1659 11.3217 0.0000 10,141.53 78 10,141.53
78 1.3244 1.1352 10,512.92
46 2024 91.2153 16.1990 21.8465 0.0520 2.1057 0.6350 2.7407 0.5672 0.5973 1.1645 0.0000 5,188.276 3 5,188.276
3 0.7174 0.2061 5,266.699
2 Maximum 91.2153 33.0617 22.5245 0.0959 19.8582 1.2672 21.1254 10.1558 1.1659 11.3217 0.0000 10,141.53 78 10,141.53
78 1.3244 1.1352 10,512.92
46 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 28 Date: 11/8/2022 4:02 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 28 Date: 11/8/2022 4:02 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 4.3421 1.8000e0040.0199 0.0000 7.0000e0057.0000e0057.0000e0057.0000e0050.0427 0.0427 1.1000e0040.0455 Energy 0.1136 1.0328 0.8676 6.2000e0030.0785 0.0785 0.0785 0.0785 1,239.372 6 1,239.372
6 0.0238 0.0227 1,246.737
6 Mobile 3.2749 3.8633 35.4119 0.0797 8.7445 0.0586 8.8031 2.3293 0.0544 2.3837 8,270.756 2 8,270.756
2 0.5388 0.3412 8,385.917
8 Total 7.7306 4.8962 36.2993 0.0859 8.7445 0.1371 8.8817 2.3293 0.1329 2.4622 9,510.171 5 9,510.171
5 0.5627 0.3640 9,632.700
8 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 4.3421 1.8000e0040.0199 0.0000 7.0000e0057.0000e0057.0000e0057.0000e0050.0427 0.0427 1.1000e0040.0455 Energy 0.1136 1.0328 0.8676 6.2000e0030.0785 0.0785 0.0785 0.0785 1,239.372 6 1,239.372
6 0.0238 0.0227 1,246.737
6 Mobile 3.2749 3.8633 35.4119 0.0797 8.7445 0.0586 8.8031 2.3293 0.0544 2.3837 8,270.756 2 8,270.756
2 0.5388 0.3412 8,385.917
8 Total 7.7306 4.8962 36.2993 0.0859 8.7445 0.1371 8.8817 2.3293 0.1329 2.4622 9,510.171 5 9,510.171
5 0.5627 0.3640 9,632.700
8 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 28 Date: 11/8/2022 4:02 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 286,290; Non-Residential Outdoor: 95,430; Striped Parking Area: 10,663 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 15
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 20
Acres of Paving: 4.08
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 28 Date: 11/8/2022 4:02 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Water Exposed Area
Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 1,349.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 6 15.00 0.00 2,215.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 154.00 60.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 31.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 28 Date: 11/8/2022 4:02 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 14.5995 0.0000 14.5995 2.2105 0.0000 2.2105 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.2691 21.4844 19.6434 0.0388 0.9975 0.9975 0.9280 0.9280 3,746.984 0 3,746.984
0 1.0494 3,773.218
3 Total 2.2691 21.4844 19.6434 0.0388 14.5995 0.9975 15.5970 2.2105 0.9280 3.1385 3,746.984 0 3,746.984
0 1.0494 3,773.218
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.1369 9.1896 2.3815 0.0395 1.1807 0.0557 1.2363 0.3237 0.0533 0.3770 4,339.311 5 4,339.311
5 0.2384 0.6891 4,550.621
3 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0516 0.0370 0.4996 1.4100e0030.1677 1.0100e0030.1687 0.0445 9.3000e0040.0454 143.8840 143.8840 3.8300e0033.7000e003145.0818 Total 0.1885 9.2265 2.8811 0.0409 1.3483 0.0567 1.4050 0.3682 0.0542 0.4224 4,483.195 5 4,483.195
5 0.2422 0.6928 4,695.703
2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 28 Date: 11/8/2022 4:02 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 14.5995 0.0000 14.5995 2.2105 0.0000 2.2105 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.2691 21.4844 19.6434 0.0388 0.9975 0.9975 0.9280 0.9280 0.0000 3,746.984 0 3,746.984
0 1.0494 3,773.218
3 Total 2.2691 21.4844 19.6434 0.0388 14.5995 0.9975 15.5970 2.2105 0.9280 3.1385 0.0000 3,746.984 0 3,746.984
0 1.0494 3,773.218
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.1369 9.1896 2.3815 0.0395 1.1807 0.0557 1.2363 0.3237 0.0533 0.3770 4,339.311 5 4,339.311
5 0.2384 0.6891 4,550.621
3 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0516 0.0370 0.4996 1.4100e0030.1677 1.0100e0030.1687 0.0445 9.3000e0040.0454 143.8840 143.8840 3.8300e0033.7000e003145.0818 Total 0.1885 9.2265 2.8811 0.0409 1.3483 0.0567 1.4050 0.3682 0.0542 0.4224 4,483.195 5 4,483.195
5 0.2422 0.6928 4,695.703
2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 28 Date: 11/8/2022 4:02 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.3 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 19.6570 0.0000 19.6570 10.1025 0.0000 10.1025 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.6595 27.5242 18.2443 0.0381 1.2660 1.2660 1.1647 1.1647 3,687.308 1 3,687.308
1 1.1926 3,717.121
9 Total 2.6595 27.5242 18.2443 0.0381 19.6570 1.2660 20.9230 10.1025 1.1647 11.2672 3,687.308 1 3,687.308
1 1.1926 3,717.121
9 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0619 0.0444 0.5996 1.6900e0030.2012 1.2100e0030.2024 0.0534 1.1200e0030.0545 172.6608 172.6608 4.6000e0034.4400e003174.0982 Total 0.0619 0.0444 0.5996 1.6900e0030.2012 1.2100e0030.2024 0.0534 1.1200e0030.0545 172.6608 172.6608 4.6000e0034.4400e003174.0982 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 28 Date: 11/8/2022 4:02 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.3 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 19.6570 0.0000 19.6570 10.1025 0.0000 10.1025 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.6595 27.5242 18.2443 0.0381 1.2660 1.2660 1.1647 1.1647 0.0000 3,687.308 1 3,687.308
1 1.1926 3,717.121
9 Total 2.6595 27.5242 18.2443 0.0381 19.6570 1.2660 20.9230 10.1025 1.1647 11.2672 0.0000 3,687.308 1 3,687.308
1 1.1926 3,717.121
9 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0619 0.0444 0.5996 1.6900e0030.2012 1.2100e0030.2024 0.0534 1.1200e0030.0545 172.6608 172.6608 4.6000e0034.4400e003174.0982 Total 0.0619 0.0444 0.5996 1.6900e0030.2012 1.2100e0030.2024 0.0534 1.1200e0030.0545 172.6608 172.6608 4.6000e0034.4400e003174.0982 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 28 Date: 11/8/2022 4:02 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 7.1828 0.0000 7.1828 3.4399 0.0000 3.4399 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.7109 17.9359 14.7507 0.0297 0.7749 0.7749 0.7129 0.7129 2,872.691 0 2,872.691
0 0.9291 2,895.918
2 Total 1.7109 17.9359 14.7507 0.0297 7.1828 0.7749 7.9577 3.4399 0.7129 4.1528 2,872.691 0 2,872.691
0 0.9291 2,895.918
2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.2247 15.0889 3.9103 0.0648 1.9386 0.0914 2.0300 0.5315 0.0874 0.6190 7,124.962 8 7,124.962
8 0.3914 1.1315 7,471.924
6 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0516 0.0370 0.4996 1.4100e0030.1677 1.0100e0030.1687 0.0445 9.3000e0040.0454 143.8840 143.8840 3.8300e0033.7000e003145.0818 Total 0.2763 15.1258 4.4099 0.0663 2.1063 0.0924 2.1987 0.5760 0.0884 0.6644 7,268.846 9 7,268.846
9 0.3953 1.1352 7,617.006
4 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 28 Date: 11/8/2022 4:02 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 7.1828 0.0000 7.1828 3.4399 0.0000 3.4399 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.7109 17.9359 14.7507 0.0297 0.7749 0.7749 0.7129 0.7129 0.0000 2,872.691 0 2,872.691
0 0.9291 2,895.918
2 Total 1.7109 17.9359 14.7507 0.0297 7.1828 0.7749 7.9577 3.4399 0.7129 4.1528 0.0000 2,872.691 0 2,872.691
0 0.9291 2,895.918
2 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.2247 15.0889 3.9103 0.0648 1.9386 0.0914 2.0300 0.5315 0.0874 0.6190 7,124.962 8 7,124.962
8 0.3914 1.1315 7,471.924
6 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0516 0.0370 0.4996 1.4100e0030.1677 1.0100e0030.1687 0.0445 9.3000e0040.0454 143.8840 143.8840 3.8300e0033.7000e003145.0818 Total 0.2763 15.1258 4.4099 0.0663 2.1063 0.0924 2.1987 0.5760 0.0884 0.6644 7,268.846 9 7,268.846
9 0.3953 1.1352 7,617.006
4 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 28 Date: 11/8/2022 4:02 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0667 2.4112 0.9202 0.0112 0.3843 0.0117 0.3960 0.1107 0.0111 0.1218 1,203.721 8 1,203.721
8 0.0401 0.1732 1,256.346
6 Worker 0.5298 0.3798 5.1294 0.0144 1.7214 0.0104 1.7317 0.4565 9.5600e0030.4661 1,477.209 1 1,477.209
1 0.0394 0.0380 1,489.506
7 Total 0.5966 2.7910 6.0497 0.0256 2.1057 0.0220 2.1277 0.5672 0.0207 0.5879 2,680.931 0 2,680.931
0 0.0795 0.2112 2,745.853
3 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 28 Date: 11/8/2022 4:02 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0667 2.4112 0.9202 0.0112 0.3843 0.0117 0.3960 0.1107 0.0111 0.1218 1,203.721 8 1,203.721
8 0.0401 0.1732 1,256.346
6 Worker 0.5298 0.3798 5.1294 0.0144 1.7214 0.0104 1.7317 0.4565 9.5600e0030.4661 1,477.209 1 1,477.209
1 0.0394 0.0380 1,489.506
7 Total 0.5966 2.7910 6.0497 0.0256 2.1057 0.0220 2.1277 0.5672 0.0207 0.5879 2,680.931 0 2,680.931
0 0.0795 0.2112 2,745.853
3 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 28 Date: 11/8/2022 4:02 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Total 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0645 2.4162 0.9009 0.0110 0.3843 0.0117 0.3961 0.1107 0.0112 0.1219 1,185.686 0 1,185.686
0 0.0402 0.1708 1,237.591
4 Worker 0.4955 0.3391 4.7787 0.0140 1.7214 9.9600e0031.7313 0.4565 9.1700e0030.4657 1,446.891 4 1,446.891
4 0.0357 0.0353 1,458.300
2 Total 0.5600 2.7552 5.6797 0.0250 2.1057 0.0217 2.1274 0.5672 0.0204 0.5876 2,632.577 4 2,632.577
4 0.0759 0.2061 2,695.891
6 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 28 Date: 11/8/2022 4:02 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 0.0000 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Total 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 0.0000 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0645 2.4162 0.9009 0.0110 0.3843 0.0117 0.3961 0.1107 0.0112 0.1219 1,185.686 0 1,185.686
0 0.0402 0.1708 1,237.591
4 Worker 0.4955 0.3391 4.7787 0.0140 1.7214 9.9600e0031.7313 0.4565 9.1700e0030.4657 1,446.891 4 1,446.891
4 0.0357 0.0353 1,458.300
2 Total 0.5600 2.7552 5.6797 0.0250 2.1057 0.0217 2.1274 0.5672 0.0204 0.5876 2,632.577 4 2,632.577
4 0.0759 0.2061 2,695.891
6 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 28 Date: 11/8/2022 4:02 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Paving 0.5345 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.5226 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0483 0.0330 0.4655 1.3700e0030.1677 9.7000e0040.1686 0.0445 8.9000e0040.0454 140.9310 140.9310 3.4700e0033.4400e003142.0422 Total 0.0483 0.0330 0.4655 1.3700e0030.1677 9.7000e0040.1686 0.0445 8.9000e0040.0454 140.9310 140.9310 3.4700e0033.4400e003142.0422 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 28 Date: 11/8/2022 4:02 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 0.0000 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Paving 0.5345 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.5226 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 0.0000 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0483 0.0330 0.4655 1.3700e0030.1677 9.7000e0040.1686 0.0445 8.9000e0040.0454 140.9310 140.9310 3.4700e0033.4400e003142.0422 Total 0.0483 0.0330 0.4655 1.3700e0030.1677 9.7000e0040.1686 0.0445 8.9000e0040.0454 140.9310 140.9310 3.4700e0033.4400e003142.0422 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 28 Date: 11/8/2022 4:02 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 90.9348 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 91.1155 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0997 0.0683 0.9620 2.8200e0030.3465 2.0100e0030.3485 0.0919 1.8500e0030.0937 291.2574 291.2574 7.1800e0037.1000e003293.5539 Total 0.0997 0.0683 0.9620 2.8200e0030.3465 2.0100e0030.3485 0.0919 1.8500e0030.0937 291.2574 291.2574 7.1800e0037.1000e003293.5539 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 28 Date: 11/8/2022 4:02 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 90.9348 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 91.1155 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0997 0.0683 0.9620 2.8200e0030.3465 2.0100e0030.3485 0.0919 1.8500e0030.0937 291.2574 291.2574 7.1800e0037.1000e003293.5539 Total 0.0997 0.0683 0.9620 2.8200e0030.3465 2.0100e0030.3485 0.0919 1.8500e0030.0937 291.2574 291.2574 7.1800e0037.1000e003293.5539 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 28 Date: 11/8/2022 4:02 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 3.2749 3.8633 35.4119 0.0797 8.7445 0.0586 8.8031 2.3293 0.0544 2.3837 8,270.756 2 8,270.756
2 0.5388 0.3412 8,385.917
8 Unmitigated 3.2749 3.8633 35.4119 0.0797 8.7445 0.0586 8.8031 2.3293 0.0544 2.3837 8,270.756 2 8,270.756
2 0.5388 0.3412 8,385.917
8 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.1136 1.0328 0.8676 6.2000e0030.0785 0.0785 0.0785 0.0785 1,239.372 6 1,239.372
6 0.0238 0.0227 1,246.737
6 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.1136 1.0328 0.8676 6.2000e0030.0785 0.0785 0.0785 0.0785 1,239.372 6 1,239.372
6 0.0238 0.0227 1,246.737
6 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 28 Date: 11/8/2022 4:02 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
General Office
Building
247.945 2.6700e0030.0243 0.0204 1.5000e0041.8500e0031.8500e0031.8500e0031.8500e00329.1700 29.1700 5.6000e0045.3000e00429.3434 Manufacturing 10286.7 0.1109 1.0085 0.8471 6.0500e0030.0767 0.0767 0.0767 0.0767 1,210.202 6 1,210.202
6 0.0232 0.0222 1,217.394
2 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.1136 1.0328 0.8676 6.2000e0030.0785 0.0785 0.0785 0.0785 1,239.372 6 1,239.372
6 0.0238 0.0227 1,246.737
6 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 28 Date: 11/8/2022 4:02 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

0.247945 2.6700e0030.0243 0.0204 1.5000e0041.8500e0031.8500e0031.8500e0031.8500e00329.1700 29.1700 5.6000e0045.3000e00429.3434 Manufacturing 10.2867 0.1109 1.0085 0.8471 6.0500e0030.0767 0.0767 0.0767 0.0767 1,210.202 6 1,210.202
6 0.0232 0.0222 1,217.394
2 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.1136 1.0328 0.8676 6.2000e0030.0785 0.0785 0.0785 0.0785 1,239.372 6 1,239.372
6 0.0238 0.0227 1,246.737
6 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 28 Date: 11/8/2022 4:02 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 4.3421 1.8000e0040.0199 0.0000 7.0000e0057.0000e0057.0000e0057.0000e0050.0427 0.0427 1.1000e0040.0455 Unmitigated 4.3421 1.8000e0040.0199 0.0000 7.0000e0057.0000e0057.0000e0057.0000e0050.0427 0.0427 1.1000e0040.0455

0.4983 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

3.8420 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 1.8300e0031.8000e0040.0199 0.0000 7.0000e0057.0000e0057.0000e0057.0000e0050.0427 0.0427 1.1000e0040.0455 Total 4.3421 1.8000e0040.0199 0.0000 7.0000e0057.0000e0057.0000e0057.0000e0050.0427 0.0427 1.1000e0040.0455 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 26 of 28 Date: 11/8/2022 4:02 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

0.4983 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

3.8420 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 1.8300e0031.8000e0040.0199 0.0000 7.0000e0057.0000e0057.0000e0057.0000e0050.0427 0.0427 1.1000e0040.0455 Total 4.3421 1.8000e0040.0199 0.0000 7.0000e0057.0000e0057.0000e0057.0000e0050.0427 0.0427 1.1000e0040.0455 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 27 of 28 Date: 11/8/2022 4:02 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

11.0 Vegetation

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 28 of 28 Date: 11/8/2022 4:02 PM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Annual Emissions (tons/year) 0.1003 Annual Emissions (tons/year) 0.0015 Daily Emissions (lbs/day) 0.549589041 Daily Emissions (lbs/day) 0.008219178 Construction Duration (days) 364 Total DPM (lbs) 3
Total DPM (lbs) 200.050411 Emission Rate (g/s) 4.31507E-05 Total DPM (g) 90742.86641 Release Height (meters) 3
Start Date 1/2/2023 Total Acreage 8.46
End Date 1/1/2024 Max Horizontal (meters) 261.67
Construction Days 364 Min Horizontal (meters) 130.84
Initial Vertical Dimension (meters) 1.5
Annual Emissions (tons/year) 0.0132 Setting Urban
Daily Emissions (lbs/day) 0.072328767 Population 59,702 Construction Duration (days) 150
Total DPM (lbs) 10.84931507
Total DPM (g) 4921.249315
Start Date 1/1/2024
End Date 5/30/2024
Construction Days 150
Total DPM (lbs) 210.899726
Total DPM (g) 95664.11573
Emission Rate (g/s) 0.002154131
Release Height (meters) 3
Total Acreage 8.46
Max Horizontal (meters) 261.67
Min Horizontal (meters) 130.84
Initial Vertical Dimension (meters) 1.5
Setting Urban
Population 59,702
Start Date 1/2/2023
End Date 5/30/2024
Total Construction Days 514
Total Years of Construction 1.41
Total Years of Operation 28.59
2024
Operation
2023
Total
Emission Rate
Construction
Attachment B
AERSCREEN 21112 / AERMOD 21112 11/08/22
16:33:46
TITLE: Gardena Industrial Center, Construction
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ******************************  AREA PARAMETERS  **************************** ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ SOURCE EMISSION RATE: 0.215E‐02 g/s 0.171E‐01 lb/hr
AREA EMISSION RATE: 0.629E‐07 g/(s‐m2) 0.499E‐06 lb/(hr‐m2) AREA HEIGHT: 3.00 meters 9.84 feet
AREA SOURCE LONG SIDE: 261.67 meters 858.50 feet
AREA SOURCE SHORT SIDE: 130.84 meters 429.27 feet
INITIAL VERTICAL DIMENSION: 1.50 meters 4.92 feet
RURAL OR URBAN: URBAN
POPULATION: 59702
INITIAL PROBE DISTANCE = 5000. meters 16404. feet
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ***********************  BUILDING DOWNWASH PARAMETERS  ********************** ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ BUILDING DOWNWASH NOT USED FOR NON‐POINT SOURCES
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ **************************  FLOW SECTOR ANALYSIS  *************************** 25 meter receptor spacing: 1. meters ‐ 5000. meters
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ MAXIMUM  IMPACT  RECEPTOR
Zo SURFACE   1‐HR CONC  RADIAL  DIST   TEMPORAL
SECTOR    ROUGHNESS  (ug/m3)    (deg)   (m)    PERIOD
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1*       1.000     2.457 5   125.0     WIN
* = worst case diagonal
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Attachment C
**********************  MAKEMET METEOROLOGY PARAMETERS  ********************* ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ MIN/MAX TEMPERATURE:    250.0 / 310.0 (K)
MINIMUM WIND SPEED:       0.5 m/s
ANEMOMETER HEIGHT:     10.000 meters
SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS INPUT: AERMET SEASONAL TABLES
DOMINANT SURFACE PROFILE: Urban
DOMINANT CLIMATE TYPE:    Average Moisture
DOMINANT SEASON:          Winter
ALBEDO:                  0.35
BOWEN RATIO:             1.50
ROUGHNESS LENGTH:       1.000 (meters)
SURFACE FRICTION VELOCITY (U*) NOT ADUSTED

METEOROLOGY CONDITIONS USED TO PREDICT OVERALL MAXIMUM IMPACT ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

YR MO DY JDY HR
‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐‐ ‐‐
10 01 10 10 01
H0 U* W* DT/DZ ZICNV ZIMCH M‐O LEN Z0 BOWEN ALBEDO REF WS ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐1.30 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 HT REF TA HT
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

10.0 310.0 2.0
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ************************ AERSCREEN AUTOMATED DISTANCES **********************

OVERALL MAXIMUM CONCENTRATIONS BY DISTANCE
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ MAXIMUM                             MAXIMUM
DIST     1‐HR CONC                  DIST     1‐HR CONC
(m)      (ug/m3)                    (m)      (ug/m3)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐               ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

1.00 1.881 2525.00 0.4969E‐01

25.00 2.026 2550.00 0.4902E
‐01

50.00 2.156 2575.00 0.4837E‐01

75.00     2.268                   2600.00    0.4774E‐01 100.00     2.367                   2625.00    0.4711E‐01 125.00     2.457                   2650.00    0.4651E‐01 150.00     2.295                   2675.00    0.4591E‐01 175.00     1.624                   2700.00    0.4533E‐01 200.00     1.331                   2725.00    0.4476E‐01 225.00     1.149                   2750.00    0.4421E‐01 250.00     1.014                   2775.00    0.4366E‐01 275.00    0.9035                   2800.00    0.4313E
‐01
300.00    0.8126                   2825.00    0.4261E‐01 325.00    0.7361                   2850.00    0.4210E‐01 350.00    0.6712                   2875.00    0.4160E‐01 375.00    0.6153                   2900.00    0.4111E‐01 400.00    0.5672                   2925.00    0.4063E‐01 425.00    0.5250                   2950.00    0.4016E‐01 450.00    0.4881                   2975.00    0.3970E‐01 475.00    0.4551                   3000.00    0.3924E‐01 500.00    0.4262                   3025.00    0.3880E‐01 525.00    0.4000                   3050.00    0.3837E
‐01
550.00    0.3766                   3075.00    0.3794E‐01 575.00    0.3555                   3100.00    0.3752E‐01 600.00    0.3362                   3125.00    0.3711E‐01 625.00    0.3187                   3150.00    0.3671E‐01 650.00    0.3027                   3174.99    0.3631E‐01 675.00    0.2883                   3199.99    0.3593E‐01 700.00    0.2749                   3225.00    0.3555E‐01 725.00    0.2623                   3250.00    0.3517E‐01 750.00    0.2508                   3275.00    0.3481E‐01 775.00    0.2401                   3300.00    0.3445E
‐01
800.00    0.2303                   3325.00    0.3409E‐01 825.00    0.2212                   3350.00    0.3374E‐01 850.00    0.2126                   3375.00    0.3340E‐01 875.00    0.2046                   3400.00    0.3307E‐01 900.00    0.1971                   3425.00    0.3274E‐01 925.00    0.1900                   3450.00    0.3241E‐01 950.00    0.1833                   3475.00    0.3209E‐01 975.00    0.1771                   3500.00    0.3178E‐01 1000.00    0.1712                   3525.00    0.3147E‐01 1025.00    0.1657                   3550.00    0.3117E
‐01
1050.00    0.1605                   3575.00    0.3087E‐01 1075.00    0.1555                   3600.00    0.3058E‐01 1100.00    0.1508                   3625.00    0.3029E‐01 1125.00    0.1463                   3650.00    0.3001E‐01 1150.00    0.1421                   3675.00    0.2973E‐01 1175.00    0.1380                   3700.00    0.2945E‐01 1200.00    0.1342                   3725.00    0.2918E‐01 1225.00    0.1305                   3750.00    0.2892E‐01 1250.00    0.1271                   3775.00    0.2866E‐01 1275.00    0.1238                   3800.00    0.2840E
‐01
1300.00    0.1206                   3825.00    0.2814E‐01 1325.00    0.1175                   3849.99    0.2790E‐01 1350.00    0.1146                   3875.00    0.2765E‐01 1375.00    0.1118                   3900.00    0.2741E‐01 1400.00    0.1092                   3925.00    0.2717E‐01 1425.00    0.1066                   3950.00    0.2693E‐01 1450.00    0.1041                   3975.00    0.2670E‐01 1475.00    0.1017                   4000.00    0.2647E‐01 1500.00    0.9945E‐01               4025.00    0.2625E‐01 1525.00    0.9725E‐01               4050.00    0.2603E‐01 1550.00    0.9513E‐01               4075.00    0.2581E‐01 1575.00    0.9309E‐01               4100.00    0.2559E‐01 1600.00    0.9113E‐01               4125.00    0.2538E‐01 1625.00    0.8925E‐01               4150.00    0.2517E‐01 1650.00    0.8743E‐01               4175.00    0.2497E‐01 1675.00    0.8567E‐01               4200.00    0.2476E‐01 1700.00    0.8397E‐01               4225.00    0.2456E‐01 1725.00    0.8232E
‐01               4250.00    0.2437E‐01
1750.00    0.8074E‐01               4275.00    0.2417E‐01 1775.00    0.7921E‐01               4300.00    0.2398E‐01 1800.00    0.7773E‐01               4325.00    0.2379E‐01 1825.00    0.7630E‐01               4350.00    0.2360E‐01 1850.00    0.7491E‐01               4375.00    0.2342E‐01 1875.00    0.7357E‐01               4400.00    0.2324E‐01 1900.00    0.7227E‐01               4425.00    0.2306E‐01 1925.00    0.7101E‐01               4450.00    0.2288E
‐01
1950.00    0.6978E‐01               4475.00    0.2271E‐01 1975.00    0.6860E‐01               4500.00    0.2253E‐01 2000.00    0.6744E‐01               4525.00    0.2236E‐01 2025.00    0.6632E‐01               4550.00    0.2220E‐01 2050.00    0.6523E‐01               4575.00    0.2203E‐01 2075.00    0.6417E‐01               4600.00    0.2187E‐01 2100.00    0.6314E‐01               4625.00    0.2171E‐01 2125.00    0.6213E‐01               4650.00    0.2155E‐01 2150.00    0.6116E
‐01               4675.00    0.2139E‐01
2175.00    0.6020E‐01               4700.00    0.2123E‐01 2200.00    0.5927E‐01               4725.00    0.2108E‐01 2225.00    0.5837E‐01               4750.00    0.2093E‐01 2250.00    0.5749E‐01               4775.00    0.2078E‐01 2275.00    0.5663E‐01               4800.00    0.2063E‐01 2300.00    0.5580E‐01               4825.00    0.2048E‐01 2325.00    0.5498E‐01               4850.00    0.2034E‐01 2350.00    0.5419E‐01               4875.00    0.2020E
‐01
2375.00    0.5342E‐01               4900.00    0.2006E‐01 2400.00    0.5266E‐01               4925.00    0.1992E‐01 2425.00    0.5251E‐01               4950.00    0.1978E‐01 2450.00    0.5178E‐01               4975.00    0.1964E‐01 2475.00    0.5107E‐01               5000.00    0.1951E‐01 2500.00    0.5037E‐01
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ **********************  AERSCREEN MAXIMUM IMPACT SUMMARY  ********************* ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ 3‐hour, 8‐hour, and 24‐hour scaled
concentrations are equal to the 1‐hour concentration as referenced in

SCREENING PROCEDURES FOR ESTIMATING THE AIR QUALITY
IMPACT OF STATIONARY SOURCES, REVISED (Section 4.5.4)
Report number EPA‐454/R‐92‐019
http://www.epa.gov/scram001/guidance_permit.htm
under Screening Guidance
MAXIMUM SCALED SCALED SCALED SCALED 1‐HOUR 3‐HOUR 8‐HOUR 24‐HOUR ANNUAL
CALCULATION CONC CONC CONC CONC CONC PROCEDURE (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3) ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ FLAT TERRAIN 2.481 2.481 2.481 2.481 N/A DISTANCE FROM SOURCE 132.00 meters

IMPACT AT THE
AMBIENT BOUNDARY    1.881       1.881       1.881       1.881         N/A DISTANCE FROM SOURCE          1.00 meters
AERSCREEN 21112 / AERMOD 21112                                      11/08/22 16:37:32
TITLE: Gardena Industrial Center, Operation
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ******************************  AREA PARAMETERS  **************************** ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ SOURCE EMISSION RATE:         0.432E‐04 g/s             0.342E‐03 lb/hr AREA EMISSION RATE:           0.126E‐08 g/(s‐m2)        0.100E‐07 lb/(hr‐m2) AREA HEIGHT:                       3.00 meters               9.84 feet AREA SOURCE LONG SIDE:           261.67 meters             858.50 feet AREA SOURCE SHORT SIDE:          130.84 meters             429.27 feet INITIAL VERTICAL DIMENSION:        1.50 meters               4.92 feet RURAL OR URBAN:                   URBAN
POPULATION:                       59702
INITIAL PROBE DISTANCE =          5000. meters             16404. feet ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ***********************  BUILDING DOWNWASH PARAMETERS  ********************** ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ BUILDING DOWNWASH NOT USED FOR NON‐POINT SOURCES
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ **************************  FLOW SECTOR ANALYSIS  *************************** 25 meter receptor spacing: 1. meters ‐ 5000. meters
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ MAXIMUM  IMPACT  RECEPTOR
Zo        SURFACE   1‐HR CONC  RADIAL  DIST   TEMPORAL
SECTOR    ROUGHNESS  (ug/m3)    (deg)   (m)    PERIOD
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1*       1.000    0.4921E‐01   5   125.0     WIN
* = worst case diagonal
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ **********************  MAKEMET METEOROLOGY PARAMETERS  ********************* ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ MIN/MAX TEMPERATURE:    250.0 / 310.0 (K)
MINIMUM WIND SPEED:       0.5 m/s
ANEMOMETER HEIGHT:     10.000 meters
SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS INPUT: AERMET SEASONAL TABLES
DOMINANT SURFACE PROFILE: Urban
DOMINANT CLIMATE TYPE:    Average Moisture
DOMINANT SEASON:          Winter
ALBEDO:                  0.35
BOWEN RATIO:             1.50
ROUGHNESS LENGTH:       1.000 (meters)
SURFACE FRICTION VELOCITY (U*) NOT ADUSTED

1.00 0.3767E‐01 2525.00 0.9950E‐03

25.00 0.4057E‐01 2550.00 0.9817E‐03

50.00 0.4317E‐01 2575.00 0.9687E‐03

75.00    0.4542E‐01 2600.00    0.9559E‐03
100.00    0.4740E‐01 2625.00    0.9435E‐03
125.00    0.4921E‐01 2650.00    0.9313E‐03
150.00    0.4595E‐01 2675.00    0.9194E‐03
175.00    0.3253E‐01 2700.00    0.9078E‐03
200.00    0.2665E‐01 2725.00    0.8964E‐03
225.00    0.2300E‐01 2750.00    0.8853E‐03
250.00    0.2030E‐01 2775.00    0.8744E‐03
275.00    0.1809E‐01 2800.00    0.8637E‐03
300.00    0.1627E‐01 2825.00    0.8533E‐03
325.00    0.1474E‐01 2850.00    0.8430E‐03
350.00    0.1344E‐01 2875.00    0.8330E‐03
375.00    0.1232E‐01 2900.00    0.8232E‐03
400.00    0.1136E‐01 2925.00    0.8136E‐03
425.00    0.1051E‐01 2950.00    0.8042E‐03
450.00    0.9774E‐02 2975.00    0.7949E‐03
475.00    0.9114E‐02 3000.00    0.7859E‐03
500.00    0.8534E‐02 3025.00    0.7770E‐03
525.00    0.8011E‐02 3050.00    0.7683E‐03
550.00    0.7541E‐02 3075.00    0.7598E‐03
575.00    0.7119E‐02 3100.00    0.7514E‐03
600.00    0.6733E‐02 3125.00    0.7432E‐03
625.00    0.6381E‐02 3150.00    0.7351E‐03
650.00    0.6063E‐02 3174.99    0.7272E‐03
675.00    0.5772E‐02 3199.99    0.7194E‐03
700.00    0.5504E‐02 3225.00    0.7118E‐03
725.00    0.5253E‐02 3250.00    0.7043E‐03
750.00    0.5022E‐02 3275.00    0.6970E‐03
775.00    0.4809E‐02 3300.00    0.6898E‐03
800.00    0.4612E‐02 3325.00    0.6827E‐03
825.00    0.4429E‐02 3350.00    0.6757E‐03
850.00    0.4258E‐02 3375.00    0.6689E‐03
875.00    0.4097E‐02 3400.00    0.6622E‐03
900.00    0.3946E‐02 3425.00    0.6556E‐03
925.00    0.3805E‐02 3450.00    0.6491E‐03
950.00    0.3672E‐02 3475.00    0.6427E‐03
975.00    0.3546E‐02 3500.00    0.6364E‐03
1000.00    0.3429E‐02 3525.00    0.6303E‐03
1025.00    0.3318E‐02 3550.00    0.6242E‐03
1050.00    0.3213E‐02 3575.00    0.6182E‐03
1075.00    0.3114E‐02 3600.00    0.6124E‐03
1100.00    0.3020E‐02 3625.00    0.6066E‐03
1125.00    0.2930E‐02 3650.00    0.6009E‐03
1150.00    0.2845E‐02 3675.00    0.5953E‐03
1175.00    0.2764E‐02 3700.00    0.5898E‐03
1200.00    0.2687E‐02 3725.00    0.5844E‐03
1225.00    0.2614E‐02 3750.00    0.5791E‐03
1250.00    0.2544E‐02 3775.00    0.5739E‐03
1275.00    0.2478E
‐02 3800.00    0.5687E‐03
1300.00    0.2415E‐02 3825.00    0.5636E‐03
1325.00    0.2354E‐02 3849.99    0.5586E‐03
1350.00    0.2295E‐02 3875.00    0.5537E‐03
1375.00    0.2239E‐02 3900.00    0.5488E‐03
1400.00    0.2186E‐02 3925.00    0.5441E‐03
1425.00    0.2135E‐02 3950.00    0.5394E‐03
1450.00    0.2085E‐02 3975.00    0.5347E‐03
1475.00    0.2037E‐02 4000.00    0.5302E‐03
1500.00    0.1991E‐02 4025.00    0.5257E‐03
1525.00    0.1947E‐02 4050.00    0.5212E‐03
1550.00    0.1905E‐02 4075.00    0.5169E‐03
1575.00    0.1864E‐02 4100.00    0.5125E‐03
1600.00    0.1825E‐02 4125.00    0.5083E‐03
1625.00    0.1787E‐02 4150.00    0.5041E‐03
1650.00    0.1751E‐02 4175.00    0.5000E‐03
1675.00    0.1716E‐02 4200.00    0.4959E‐03
1700.00    0.1681E‐02 4225.00    0.4919E‐03
1725.00    0.1649E‐02 4250.00    0.4880E‐03
1750.00    0.1617E‐02 4275.00    0.4841E‐03
1775.00    0.1586E‐02 4300.00    0.4802E‐03
1800.00    0.1557E‐02 4325.00    0.4764E‐03
1825.00    0.1528E‐02 4350.00    0.4727E‐03
1850.00    0.1500E‐02 4375.00    0.4690E‐03
1875.00    0.1473E‐02 4400.00    0.4653E‐03
1900.00    0.1447E‐02 4425.00    0.4618E‐03
1925.00    0.1422E‐02 4450.00    0.4582E‐03
1950.00    0.1397E‐02 4475.00    0.4547E‐03
1975.00    0.1374E‐02 4500.00    0.4513E‐03
2000.00    0.1351E‐02 4525.00    0.4479E‐03
2025.00    0.1328E‐02 4550.00    0.4445E‐03
2050.00    0.1306E‐02 4575.00    0.4412E‐03
2075.00    0.1285E‐02 4600.00    0.4379E‐03
2100.00    0.1264E‐02 4625.00    0.4347E‐03
2125.00    0.1244E‐02 4650.00    0.4315E‐03
2150.00    0.1225E‐02 4675.00    0.4283E‐03
2175.00    0.1206E‐02 4700.00    0.4252E‐03
2200.00    0.1187E‐02 4725.00    0.4221E‐03
2225.00    0.1169E‐02 4750.00    0.4191E‐03
2250.00    0.1151E‐02 4775.00    0.4161E‐03
2275.00    0.1134E‐02 4800.00    0.4131E‐03
2300.00    0.1117E‐02 4825.00    0.4102E‐03
2325.00    0.1101E‐02 4850.00    0.4073E‐03
2350.00    0.1085E‐02 4875.00    0.4045E‐03
2375.00    0.1070E‐02 4900.00    0.4016E‐03
2400.00    0.1055E‐02 4925.00    0.3989E‐03
2425.00    0.1052E‐02 4950.00    0.3961E‐03
2450.00    0.1037E‐02 4975.00    0.3934E‐03
2475.00    0.1023E‐02 5000.00    0.3907E‐03
2500.00    0.1009E‐02
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ **********************  AERSCREEN MAXIMUM IMPACT SUMMARY  ********************* ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ 3‐hour, 8‐hour, and 24‐hour scaled
concentrations are equal to the 1‐hour concentration as referenced in

SCREENING PROCEDURES FOR ESTIMATING THE AIR QUALITY
IMPACT OF STATIONARY SOURCES, REVISED (Section 4.5.4)
Report number EPA‐454/R‐92‐019
http://www.epa.gov/scram001/guidance_permit.htm
under Screening Guidance
MAXIMUM SCALED SCALED SCALED SCALED 1‐HOUR 3‐HOUR 8‐HOUR 24‐HOUR ANNUAL
CALCULATION CONC CONC CONC CONC CONC PROCEDURE (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3) ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ FLAT TERRAIN 0.4968E‐01 0.4968E‐01 0.4968E‐01 0.4968E‐01 N/A DISTANCE FROM SOURCE 132.00 meters

IMPACT AT THE
AMBIENT BOUNDARY 0.3767E‐01 0.3767E‐01 0.3767E‐01 0.3767E‐01 N/A DISTANCE FROM SOURCE 1.00 meters
2656 29th Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, CA 90405
Matt Hagemann, P.G, C.Hg.
(949) 887-9013
[email protected]
Matthew F. Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg., QSD, QSP
Geologic and Hydrogeologic Characterization
Investigationand RemediationStrategies
LitigationSupport and Testifying Expert
IndustrialStormwaterCompliance
CEQAReview
Education:

M.S. Degree, Geology, California State University Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 1984.

B.A. Degree, Geology, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA, 1982.

ProfessionalCertifications:

California Professional Geologist
California Certified Hydrogeologist
Qualified SWPPP Developer and Practitioner
ProfessionalExperience:

Matt has 30 years of experience in environmental policy, contaminant assessment and remediation, stormwater compliance, and CEQA review. He spent nine years with the U.S. EPA in the RCRA and Superfund programs and served as EPA’s Senior Science Policy Advisor in the Western Regional Office where he identified emerging threats to groundwater from perchlorate and MTBE. While with EPA, Matt also served as a Senior Hydrogeologist in the oversight of the assessment of seven major military facilities undergoing base closure. He led numerous enforcement actions under provisions of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and directed efforts to improve hydrogeologic characterization and water quality monitoring. For the past 15 years, as a founding partner with SWAPE, Matt has developed extensive client relationships and has managed complex projects that include consultation as an expert witness and a regulatory specialist, and a manager of projects ranging from industrial stormwater compliance to CEQA review of impacts from hazardous waste, air quality and greenhouse gas emissions.

Positions Matt has held include:
• Founding Partner, Soil/Water/Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE) (2003 – present); • Geology Instructor, Golden West College, 2010 – 2104, 2017; • Senior Environmental Analyst, Komex H2O Science, Inc. (2000 ‐‐ 2003); Attachment D
2 • Executive Director, Orange Coast Watch (2001 – 2004); • Senior Science Policy Advisor and Hydrogeologist, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1989– 1998);
• Hydrogeologist, National Park Service, Water Resources Division (1998 – 2000); • Adjunct Faculty Member, San Francisco State University, Department of Geosciences (1993 – 1998);
• Instructor, College of Marin, Department of Science (1990 – 1995); • Geologist, U.S. Forest Service (1986 – 1998); and
• Geologist, Dames & Moore (1984 – 1986).

Senior Regulatory and Litigation Support Analyst:

With SWAPE, Matt’s responsibilities have included:
• Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of over 300 environmental impact reports and negative declarations since 2003 under CEQA that identify significant issues with regard to hazardous waste, water resources, water quality, air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, and geologic hazards. Make recommendations for additional mitigation measures to lead agencies at the local and county level to include additional characterization of health risks and implementation of protective measures to reduce worker exposure to hazards from toxins and Valley Fever.
• Stormwater analysis, sampling and best management practice evaluation at more than 100 industrial facilities.
• Expert witness on numerous cases including, for example, perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) contamination of groundwater, MTBE litigation, air toxins at hazards at a school, CERCLA compliance in assessment and remediation, and industrial stormwater contamination. • Technical assistance and litigation support for vaporintrusion concerns. • Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of environmental issues in license applications forlarge solar power plants before the California Energy Commission. • Manager of a project to evaluate numerous formerly used military sites in the western U.S. • Manager of a comprehensive evaluation of potential sources of perchlorate contamination in Southern California drinking water wells.
• Manager and designated expert for litigation support under provisions of Proposition 65 in the review of releases of gasoline to sources drinking water at major refineries and hundreds of gas stations throughout California.

With Komex H2O Science Inc., Matt’s duties included the following:
• Senior author of a report on the extent of perchlorate contamination that was used in testimony by the former U.S. EPA Administrator and General Counsel. • Seniorresearcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology of MTBE use, research, and regulation.
• Seniorresearcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology of perchlorate use, research, and regulation.
• Senior researcher in a study that estimates nationwide costs for MTBE remediation and drinking water treatment, results of which were published in newspapers nationwide and in testimony against provisions of an energy bill that would limit liability for oil companies. • Research to support litigation to restore drinking water supplies that have been contaminated by MTBE in California and New York.
3 • Expert witness testimony in a case of oil production‐related contamination in Mississippi. • Lead author for a multi‐volume remedial investigation report for an operating school in Los Angeles that met strict regulatory requirements and rigorous deadlines. • Development of strategic approaches for cleanup of contaminated sites in consultation with clients and regulators.

Executive Director:

As Executive Director with Orange Coast Watch, Matt led efforts to restore water quality at Orange County beaches from multiple sources of contamination including urban runoff and the discharge of wastewater. In reporting to a Board of Directors that included representatives from leading Orange County universities and businesses, Matt prepared issue papers in the areas of treatment and disinfection of wastewater and control of the discharge of grease to sewer systems. Matt actively participated in the development of countywide water quality permits for the control of urban runoff and permits for the discharge of wastewater. Matt worked with other nonprofits to protect and restore water quality, including Surfrider, Natural Resources Defense Council and Orange County CoastKeeper as well as with business institutions including the Orange County Business Council.

Hydrogeology:

As a Senior Hydrogeologist with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Matt led investigations to characterize and cleanup closing military bases, including Mare Island Naval Shipyard, Hunters Point Naval Shipyard, Treasure Island Naval Station, Alameda Naval Station, Moffett Field, Mather Army Airfield, and Sacramento Army Depot. Specific activities were as follows:
• Led efforts to model groundwater flow and contaminant transport, ensured adequacy of monitoring networks, and assessed cleanup alternatives for contaminated sediment, soil, and groundwater.
• Initiated a regional program for evaluation of groundwater sampling practices and laboratory analysis at military bases.
• Identified emerging issues, wrote technical guidance, and assisted in policy and regulation development through work on four national U.S. EPA workgroups, including the Superfund Groundwater Technical Forum and the Federal Facilities Forum.

At the request of the State of Hawaii, Matt developed a methodology to determine the vulnerability of groundwater to contamination on the islands of Maui and Oahu. He used analytical models and a GIS to show zones of vulnerability, and the results were adopted and published by the State of Hawaii and County of Maui.

As a hydrogeologist with the EPA Groundwater Protection Section, Matt worked with provisions of the Safe Drinking Water Act and NEPA to prevent drinking water contamination. Specific activities included the following:
• Received an EPA Bronze Medal for his contribution to the development of national guidance for the protection of drinking water.
• Managed the Sole Source Aquifer Program and protected the drinking water of two communities through designation under the Safe Drinking Water Act. He prepared geologic reports, conducted 4 public hearings, and responded to public comments from residents who were very concerned about the impact of designation.
• Reviewed a number of Environmental Impact Statements for planned major developments, including large hazardous and solid waste disposal facilities, mine reclamation, and water transfer.

Matt served as a hydrogeologist with the RCRA Hazardous Waste program. Duties were as follows:
• Supervised the hydrogeologic investigation of hazardous waste sites to determine compliance with Subtitle C requirements.
• Reviewed and wrote ʺpart Bʺ permits for the disposal of hazardous waste. • Conducted RCRA Corrective Action investigations of waste sites and led inspections that formed the basis for significant enforcement actions that were developed in close coordination with U.S.

EPA legal counsel.
• Wrote contract specifications and supervised contractor’s investigations of waste sites.

With the National Park Service, Matt directed service‐wide investigations of contaminant sources to prevent degradation of water quality, including the following tasks:
• Applied pertinent laws and regulations including CERCLA, RCRA, NEPA, NRDA, and the Clean Water Act to control military, mining, and landfill contaminants. • Conducted watershed‐scale investigations of contaminants at parks, including Yellowstone and Olympic National Park.
• Identified high‐levels of perchlorate in soil adjacent to a national park in New Mexico and advised park superintendent on appropriate response actions under CERCLA. • Served as a Park Service representative on the Interagency Perchlorate Steering Committee, a national workgroup.
• Developed a program to conduct environmental compliance audits of all National Parks while serving on a national workgroup.
• Co‐authored two papers on the potential for water contamination from the operation of personal watercraft and snowmobiles, these papers serving as the basis for the development of nation‐ wide policy on the use of these vehicles in National Parks. • Contributed to the Federal Multi‐Agency Source Water Agreement under the Clean Water Action Plan.

Policy:

Served senior management as the Senior Science Policy Advisor with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9.

Activities included the following:
• Advised the Regional Administrator and senior management on emerging issues such as the potential for the gasoline additive MTBE and ammonium perchlorate to contaminate drinking water supplies.
• Shaped EPA’s national response to these threats by serving on workgroups and by contributing to guidance, including the Office of Research and Development publication, Oxygenates in Water: Critical Information and Research Needs.
• Improved the technical training of EPAʹs scientific and engineering staff. • Earned an EPA Bronze Medal for representing the region’s 300 scientists and engineers in negotiations with the Administrator and senior management to better integrate scientific 5 principles into the policy‐making process.
• Established national protocol for the peerreview of scientific documents.

Geology:

With the U.S. Forest Service, Matt led investigations to determine hillslope stability of areas proposed for timber harvest in the central Oregon Coast Range. Specific activities were as follows:
• Mapped geology in the field, and used aerial photographic interpretation and mathematical models to determine slope stability.
• Coordinated his research with community members who were concerned with natural resource protection.
• Characterized the geology of an aquifer that serves as the sole source of drinking water for the city of Medford, Oregon.

As a consultant with Dames and Moore, Matt led geologic investigations of two contaminated sites (later listed on the Superfund NPL) in the Portland, Oregon, area and a large hazardous waste site in eastern Oregon. Duties included the following:
• Supervised year‐long effort for soil and groundwater sampling. • Conducted aquifer tests.
• Investigated active faults beneath sites proposed for hazardous waste disposal.

Teaching:

From 1990 to 1998, Matt taught at least one course per semester at the community college and university levels:
• At San Francisco State University, held an adjunct faculty position and taught courses in environmental geology, oceanography (lab and lecture), hydrogeology, and groundwater contamination.
• Served as a committee member for graduate and undergraduate students. • Taught courses in environmental geology and oceanography at the College of Marin.

Matt is currently a part time geology instructor at Golden West College in Huntington Beach, California where he taught from 2010 to 2014 and in 2017.

Invited Testimony, Reports, Papers and Presentations:

Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Presentation to the Public Environmental Law Conference, Eugene, Oregon.

Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Invited presentation to U.S.

EPA Region 9, San Francisco, California.

Hagemann, M.F., 2005. Use of Electronic Databases in Environmental Regulation, Policy Making and Public Participation. Brownfields 2005, Denver, Coloradao.

Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in Nevada and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Las Vegas, NV (served on conference organizing committee).
6 Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Invited testimony to a California Senate committee hearing on air toxins at schools in Southern California, Los Angeles.

Brown, A., Farrow, J., Gray, A. and Hagemann, M., 2004. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells.

Presentation to the Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference, National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in Arizona and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Phoenix, AZ (served on conference organizing committee).

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in the Southwestern U.S. Invited presentation to a special committee meeting of the National Academy of Sciences, Irvine, CA.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a tribal EPA meeting, Pechanga, CA.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a meeting of tribal repesentatives, Parker, AZ.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Impact of Perchlorate on the Colorado River and Associated Drinking Water Supplies. Invited presentation to the Inter‐Tribal Meeting, Torres Martinez Tribe.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. The Emergence of Perchlorate as a Widespread Drinking Water Contaminant.

Invited presentation to the U.S. EPA Region 9.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. A Deductive Approach to the Assessment of Perchlorate Contamination. Invited presentation to the California Assembly Natural Resources Committee.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate: A Cold War Legacy in Drinking Water. Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater and an Estimate of Costs to Address Impacts to Groundwater. Presentation to the annual meeting of the Society of Environmental Journalists.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of the Cost to Address MTBE Contamination in Groundwater (and Who Will Pay). Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells. Presentation to a meeting of the U.S. EPA and State Underground Storage Tank Program managers.
7 Hagemann, M.F., 2001. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Unpublished report.

Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Cleanup Cost for MTBE in Groundwater Used as Drinking Water.

Unpublished report.

Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Leaking Underground Storage Tanks. Unpublished report.

Hagemann, M.F., and VanMouwerik, M., 1999. Potential W a t e r Quality Concerns Related to Snowmobile Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report.

VanMouwerik, M. and Hagemann, M.F. 1999, Water Quality Concerns Related to Personal Watercraft Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report.

Hagemann, M.F., 1999, Is Dilution the Solution to Pollution in National Parks? The George Wright Society Biannual Meeting, Asheville, North Carolina.

Hagemann, M.F., 1997, The Potential for MTBE to Contaminate Groundwater. U.S. EPA Superfund Groundwater Technical Forum Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, Nevada.

Hagemann, M.F., and Gill, M., 1996, Impediments to Intrinsic Remediation, Moffett Field Naval Air Station, Conference on Intrinsic Remediation of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons, Salt Lake City.

Hagemann, M.F., Fukunaga, G.L., 1996, The Vulnerability of Groundwater to Anthropogenic Contaminants on the Island of Maui, Hawaii. Hawaii Water Works Association Annual Meeting, Maui, October 1996.

Hagemann, M. F., Fukanaga, G. L., 1996, Ranking Groundwater Vulnerability in Central Oahu, Hawaii. Proceedings, Geographic Information Systems in Environmental Resources Management, Air and Waste Management Association Publication VIP‐61.

Hagemann, M.F., 1994. Groundwater Ch ar ac te r i z a t i o n and Cl ean up a t Closing Military Bases in California. Proceedings, California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting.

Hagemann, M.F. and Sabol, M.A., 1993. Role of the U.S. EPA in the High Plains States Groundwater Recharge Demonstration Program. Proceedings, Sixth Biennial Symposium on the Artificial Recharge of Groundwater.

Hagemann, M.F., 1993. U.S. EPA Policy on the Technical Impracticability of the Cleanup of DNAPL‐ contaminated Groundwater. California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting. 8 Hagemann, M.F., 1992. Dense Nonaqueous Phase Liquid Contamination of Groundwater: An Ounce of Prevention... Proceedings, Association of Engineering Geologists Annual Meeting, v. 35.

Other Experience:

Selected as subject matter expert for the California Professional Geologist licensing examinations, 2009‐2011.

SOIL WATER AIR PROTECTION ENTERPRISE
2656 29th Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, California 90405
Attn: Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D.

Mobil: (310) 795-2335
Office: (310) 452-5555
Fax: (310) 452-5550
Email: [email protected]
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 1 of 10 October 2021
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Chemical Fate and Transport & Air Dispersion Modeling Principal Environmental Chemist Risk Assessment & Remediation Specialist Education
Ph.D. Soil Chemistry, University of Washington, 1999. Dissertation on volatile organic compound filtration.

M.S. Environmental Science, U.C. Berkeley, 1995. Thesis on organic waste economics.

B.A. Environmental Studies, U.C. Santa Barbara, 1991. Thesis on wastewater treatment.

Professional Experience
Dr. Rosenfeld has over 25 years’ experience conducting environmental investigations and risk assessments for evaluating impacts to human health, property, and ecological receptors. His expertise focuses on the fate and transport of environmental contaminants, human health risk, exposure assessment, and ecological restoration. Dr.

Rosenfeld has evaluated and modeled emissions from oil spills, landfills, boilers and incinerators, process stacks, storage tanks, confined animal feeding operations, industrial, military and agricultural sources, unconventional oil drilling operations, and locomotive and construction engines. His project experience ranges from monitoring and modeling of pollution sources to evaluating impacts of pollution on workers at industrial facilities and residents in surrounding communities. Dr. Rosenfeld has also successfully modeled exposure to contaminants distributed by water systems and via vapor intrusion.

Dr. Rosenfeld has investigated and designed remediation programs and risk assessments for contaminated sites containing lead, heavy metals, mold, bacteria, particulate matter, petroleum hydrocarbons, chlorinated solvents, pesticides, radioactive waste, dioxins and furans, semi- and volatile organic compounds, PCBs, PAHs, creosote, perchlorate, asbestos, per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFOA/PFOS), unusual polymers, fuel oxygenates (MTBE), among other pollutants. Dr. Rosenfeld also has experience evaluating greenhouse gas emissions from various projects and is an expert on the assessment of odors from industrial and agricultural sites, as well as the evaluation of odor nuisance impacts and technologies for abatement of odorous emissions. As a principal scientist at SWAPE, Dr. Rosenfeld directs air dispersion modeling and exposure assessments. He has served as an expert witness and testified about pollution sources causing nuisance and/or personal injury at sites and has testified as an expert witness on numerous cases involving exposure to soil, water and air contaminants from industrial, railroad, agricultural, and military sources.

Attachment E
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 2 of 10 October 2021
Professional History:

Soil Water Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE); 2003 to present; Principal and Founding Partner UCLA School of Public Health; 2007 to 2011; Lecturer (Assistant Researcher) UCLA School of Public Health; 2003 to 2006; Adjunct Professor UCLA Environmental Science and Engineering Program; 2002-2004; Doctoral Intern Coordinator UCLA Institute of the Environment, 2001-2002; Research Associate Komex H2O Science, 2001 to 2003; Senior Remediation Scientist National Groundwater Association, 2002-2004; Lecturer
San Diego State University, 1999-2001; Adjunct Professor Anteon Corp., San Diego, 2000-2001; Remediation Project Manager Ogden (now Amec), San Diego, 2000-2000; Remediation Project Manager Bechtel, San Diego, California, 1999 – 2000; Risk Assessor King County, Seattle, 1996 – 1999; Scientist
James River Corp., Washington, 1995-96; Scientist
Big Creek Lumber, Davenport, California, 1995; Scientist Plumas Corp., California and USFS, Tahoe 1993-1995; Scientist Peace Corps and World Wildlife Fund, St. Kitts, West Indies, 1991-1993; Scientist Publications:

Remy, L.L., Clay T., Byers, V., Rosenfeld P. E. (2019) Hospital, Health, and Community Burden After Oil Refinery Fires, Richmond, California 2007 and 2012. Environmental Health. 18:48 Simons, R.A., Seo, Y. Rosenfeld, P., (2015) Modeling the Effect of Refinery Emission On Residential Property Value. Journal of Real Estate Research. 27(3):321-342
Chen, J. A, Zapata A. R., Sutherland A. J., Molmen, D.R., Chow, B. S., Wu, L. E., Rosenfeld, P. E., Hesse, R. C., (2012) Sulfur Dioxide and Volatile Organic Compound Exposure To A Community In Texas City Texas Evaluated Using Aermod and Empirical Data. American Journal of Environmental Science, 8(6), 622-632.

Rosenfeld, P.E. & Feng, L. (2011). The Risks of Hazardous Waste. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2011). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Agrochemical Industry, Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Gonzalez, J., Feng, L., Sutherland, A., Waller, C., Sok, H., Hesse, R., Rosenfeld, P. (2010). PCBs and Dioxins/Furans in Attic Dust Collected Near Former PCB Production and Secondary Copper Facilities in Sauget, IL.

Procedia Environmental Sciences. 113–125.

Feng, L., Wu, C., Tam, L., Sutherland, A.J., Clark, J.J., Rosenfeld, P.E. (2010). Dioxin and Furan Blood Lipid and Attic Dust Concentrations in Populations Living Near Four Wood Treatment Facilities in the United States. Journal of Environmental Health. 73(6), 34-46.

Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2010). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Wood and Paper Industries. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2009). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Petroleum Industry. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Wu, C., Tam, L., Clark, J., Rosenfeld, P. (2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in populations living near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, Air Pollution, 123 (17), 319-327.

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 3 of 10 October 2021
Tam L. K.., Wu C. D., Clark J. J. and Rosenfeld, P.E. (2008). A Statistical Analysis Of Attic Dust And Blood Lipid Concentrations Of Tetrachloro-p-Dibenzodioxin (TCDD) Toxicity Equivalency Quotients (TEQ) In Two Populations Near Wood Treatment Facilities. Organohalogen Compounds, 70, 002252-002255.

Tam L. K.., Wu C. D., Clark J. J. and Rosenfeld, P.E. (2008). Methods For Collect Samples For Assessing Dioxins And Other Environmental Contaminants In Attic Dust: A Review. Organohalogen Compounds, 70, 000527- 000530.

Hensley, A.R. A. Scott, J. J. J. Clark, Rosenfeld, P.E. (2007). Attic Dust and Human Blood Samples Collected near a Former Wood Treatment Facility. Environmental Research. 105, 194-197.

Rosenfeld, P.E., J. J. J. Clark, A. R. Hensley, M. Suffet. (2007). The Use of an Odor Wheel Classification for Evaluation of Human Health Risk Criteria for Compost Facilities. Water Science & Technology 55(5), 345-357.

Rosenfeld, P. E., M. Suffet. (2007). The Anatomy Of Odour Wheels For Odours Of Drinking Water, Wastewater, Compost And The Urban Environment. Water Science & Technology 55(5), 335-344.

Sullivan, P. J. Clark, J.J.J., Agardy, F. J., Rosenfeld, P.E. (2007). Toxic Legacy, Synthetic Toxins in the Food, Water, and Air in American Cities. Boston Massachusetts: Elsevier Publishing Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash. Water Science and Technology. 49(9),171-178.

Rosenfeld P. E., J.J. Clark, I.H. (Mel) Suffet (2004). The Value of An Odor-Quality-Wheel Classification Scheme For The Urban Environment. Water Environment Federation’s Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC) 2004. New Orleans, October 2-6, 2004.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet, I.H. (2004). Understanding Odorants Associated With Compost, Biomass Facilities, and the Land Application of Biosolids. Water Science and Technology. 49(9), 193-199.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash, Water Science and Technology, 49( 9), 171-178.

Rosenfeld, P. E., Grey, M. A., Sellew, P. (2004). Measurement of Biosolids Odor and Odorant Emissions from Windrows, Static Pile and Biofilter. Water Environment Research. 76(4), 310-315.

Rosenfeld, P.E., Grey, M and Suffet, M. (2002). Compost Demonstration Project, Sacramento California Using High-Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a Green Materials Composting Facility. Integrated Waste Management Board Public Affairs Office, Publications Clearinghouse (MS–6), Sacramento, CA Publication #442-02-008.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Characterization of odor emissions from three different biosolids. Water Soil and Air Pollution. 127(1-4), 173-191.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C. L., (2000). Wood ash control of odor emissions from biosolids application. Journal of Environmental Quality. 29, 1662-1668.

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry and D. Bennett. (2001). Wastewater dewatering polymer affect on biosolids odor emissions and microbial activity. Water Environment Research. 73(4), 363-367.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Activated Carbon and Wood Ash Sorption of Wastewater, Compost, and Biosolids Odorants. Water Environment Research, 73, 388-393.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C. L., (2001). High carbon wood ash effect on biosolids microbial activity and odor.

Water Environment Research. 131(1-4), 247-262.

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 4 of 10 October 2021
Chollack, T. and P. Rosenfeld. (1998). Compost Amendment Handbook For Landscaping. Prepared for and distributed by the City of Redmond, Washington State.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1992). The Mount Liamuiga Crater Trail. Heritage Magazine of St. Kitts, 3(2).

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1993). High School Biogas Project to Prevent Deforestation On St. Kitts. Biomass Users Network, 7(1).

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions From Biosolids Application To Forest Soil. Doctoral Thesis. University of Washington College of Forest Resources.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1994). Potential Utilization of Small Diameter Trees on Sierra County Public Land. Masters thesis reprinted by the Sierra County Economic Council. Sierra County, California.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1991). How to Build a Small Rural Anaerobic Digester & Uses Of Biogas In The First And Third World. Bachelors Thesis. University of California.

Presentations:

Rosenfeld, P.E., "The science for Perfluorinated Chemicals (PFAS): What makes remediation so hard?" Law Seminars International, (May 9-10, 2018) 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 101 Seattle, WA.

Rosenfeld, P.E., Sutherland, A; Hesse, R.; Zapata, A. (October 3-6, 2013). Air dispersion modeling of volatile organic emissions from multiple natural gas wells in Decatur, TX. 44th Western Regional Meeting, American Chemical Society. Lecture conducted from Santa Clara, CA.

Sok, H.L.; Waller, C.C.; Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sutherland, A.J.; Wisdom-Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; Hesse, R.C.; Rosenfeld, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Atrazine: A Persistent Pesticide in Urban Drinking Water.

Urban Environmental Pollution. Lecture conducted from Boston, MA.

Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sok, H.L.; Sutherland, A.J.; Waller, C.C.; Wisdom-Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; La, M.; Hesse, R.C.; Rosenfeld, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Bringing Environmental Justice to East St. Louis, Illinois. Urban Environmental Pollution. Lecture conducted from Boston, MA.

Rosenfeld, P.E. (April 19-23, 2009). Perfluoroctanoic Acid (PFOA) and Perfluoroactane Sulfonate (PFOS) Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) at Airports in the United States. 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting, Lecture conducted from Tuscon, AZ.

Rosenfeld, P.E. (April 19-23, 2009). Cost to Filter Atrazine Contamination from Drinking Water in the United States” Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) at Airports in the United States. 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting. Lecture conducted from Tuscon, AZ.

Wu, C., Tam, L., Clark, J., Rosenfeld, P. (20-22 July, 2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in populations living near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. Brebbia, C.A. and Popov, V., eds., Air Pollution XVII: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Modeling, Monitoring and Management of Air Pollution. Lecture conducted from Tallinn, Estonia.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). Moss Point Community Exposure To Contaminants From A Releasing Facility. The 23rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Platform lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). The Repeated Trespass of Tritium-Contaminated Water Into A Surrounding Community Form Repeated Waste Spills From A Nuclear Power Plant. The 23rd Annual International

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 5 of 10 October 2021
Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Platform lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). Somerville Community Exposure To Contaminants From Wood Treatment Facility Emissions. The 23rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.

Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Production, Chemical Properties, Toxicology, & Treatment Case Studies of 1,2,3- Trichloropropane (TCP). The Association for Environmental Health and Sciences (AEHS) Annual Meeting. Lecture conducted from San Diego, CA.

Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Blood and Attic Sampling for Dioxin/Furan, PAH, and Metal Exposure in Florala, Alabama. The AEHS Annual Meeting. Lecture conducted from San Diego, CA.

Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (August 21 – 25, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility. The 26th International Symposium on Halogenated Persistent Organic Pollutants – DIOXIN2006. Lecture conducted from Radisson SAS Scandinavia Hotel in Oslo Norway.

Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (November 4-8, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility. APHA 134 Annual Meeting & Exposition. Lecture conducted from Boston Massachusetts.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (October 24-25, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals.

Mealey’s C8/PFOA. Science, Risk & Litigation Conference. Lecture conducted from The Rittenhouse Hotel, Philadelphia, PA.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 19, 2005). Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference. Lecture conducted from Hilton Hotel, Irvine California.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 19, 2005). Fate, Transport, Toxicity, And Persistence of 1,2,3-TCP. PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference. Lecture conducted from Hilton Hotel in Irvine, California.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 26-27, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PDBEs. Mealey’s Groundwater Conference. Lecture conducted from Ritz Carlton Hotel, Marina Del Ray, California.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (June 7-8, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals.

International Society of Environmental Forensics: Focus On Emerging Contaminants. Lecture conducted from Sheraton Oceanfront Hotel, Virginia Beach, Virginia.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (July 21-22, 2005). Fate Transport, Persistence and Toxicology of PFOA and Related Perfluorochemicals. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water And Environmental Law Conference.

Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor, Baltimore Maryland.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (July 21-22, 2005). Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor, Baltimore Maryland.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. and Rob Hesse R.G. (May 5-6, 2004). Tert-butyl Alcohol Liability and Toxicology, A National Problem and Unquantified Liability. National Groundwater Association. Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Congress Plaza Hotel, Chicago Illinois.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (March 2004). Perchlorate Toxicology. Meeting of the American Groundwater Trust.

Lecture conducted from Phoenix Arizona.

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 6 of 10 October 2021
Hagemann, M.F., Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and Rob Hesse (2004). Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River.

Meeting of tribal representatives. Lecture conducted from Parker, AZ.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (April 7, 2004). A National Damage Assessment Model For PCE and Dry Cleaners.

Drycleaner Symposium. California Ground Water Association. Lecture conducted from Radison Hotel, Sacramento, California.

Rosenfeld, P. E., Grey, M., (June 2003) Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Seventh International In Situ And On Site Bioremediation Symposium Battelle Conference Orlando, FL.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. (February 20-21, 2003) Understanding Historical Use, Chemical Properties, Toxicity and Regulatory Guidance of 1,4 Dioxane. National Groundwater Association. Southwest Focus Conference. Water Supply and Emerging Contaminants.. Lecture conducted from Hyatt Regency Phoenix Arizona.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (February 6-7, 2003). Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. California CUPA Forum. Lecture conducted from Marriott Hotel, Anaheim California.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (October 23, 2002) Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. EPA Underground Storage Tank Roundtable. Lecture conducted from Sacramento California.

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Suffet, M. (October 7- 10, 2002). Understanding Odor from Compost, Wastewater and Industrial Processes. Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water Association. Lecture conducted from Barcelona Spain.

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Suffet, M. (October 7- 10, 2002). Using High Carbon Wood Ash to Control Compost Odor.

Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water Association. Lecture conducted from Barcelona Spain.

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Grey, M. A. (September 22-24, 2002). Biocycle Composting For Coastal Sage Restoration.

Northwest Biosolids Management Association. Lecture conducted from Vancouver Washington..

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Grey, M. A. (November 11-14, 2002). Using High-Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a Green Materials Composting Facility. Soil Science Society Annual Conference. Lecture conducted from Indianapolis, Maryland.

Rosenfeld. P.E. (September 16, 2000). Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Water Environment Federation. Lecture conducted from Anaheim California.

Rosenfeld. P.E. (October 16, 2000). Wood ash and biofilter control of compost odor. Biofest. Lecture conducted from Ocean Shores, California.

Rosenfeld, P.E. (2000). Bioremediation Using Organic Soil Amendments. California Resource Recovery Association. Lecture conducted from Sacramento California.

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High-Carbon Wood-Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings. Lecture conducted from Bellevue Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (1999). An evaluation of ash incorporation with biosolids for odor reduction. Soil Science Society of America. Lecture conducted from Salt Lake City Utah.

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Comparison of Microbial Activity and Odor Emissions from Three Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil. Brown and Caldwell. Lecture conducted from Seattle Washington.

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 7 of 10 October 2021
Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry. (1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions from Biosolids Application To Forest Soil. Biofest. Lecture conducted from Lake Chelan, Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E, C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High-Carbon Wood-Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings. Lecture conducted from Bellevue Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. B. Harrison, and R. Dills. (1997). Comparison of Odor Emissions From Three Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil. Soil Science Society of America. Lecture conducted from Anaheim California.

Teaching Experience:

UCLA Department of Environmental Health (Summer 2003 through 20010) Taught Environmental Health Science 100 to students, including undergrad, medical doctors, public health professionals and nurses. Course focused on the health effects of environmental contaminants.

National Ground Water Association, Successful Remediation Technologies. Custom Course in Sante Fe, New Mexico. May 21, 2002. Focused on fate and transport of fuel contaminants associated with underground storage tanks.

National Ground Water Association; Successful Remediation Technologies Course in Chicago Illinois. April 1, 2002. Focused on fate and transport of contaminants associated with Superfund and RCRA sites.

California Integrated Waste Management Board, April and May, 2001. Alternative Landfill Caps Seminar in San Diego, Ventura, and San Francisco. Focused on both prescriptive and innovative landfill cover design.

UCLA Department of Environmental Engineering, February 5, 2002. Seminar on Successful Remediation Technologies focusing on Groundwater Remediation.

University Of Washington, Soil Science Program, Teaching Assistant for several courses including: Soil Chemistry, Organic Soil Amendments, and Soil Stability.

U.C. Berkeley, Environmental Science Program Teaching Assistant for Environmental Science 10.

Academic Grants Awarded:

California Integrated Waste Management Board. $41,000 grant awarded to UCLA Institute of the Environment.

Goal: To investigate effect of high carbon wood ash on volatile organic emissions from compost. 2001.

Synagro Technologies, Corona California: $10,000 grant awarded to San Diego State University.

Goal: investigate effect of biosolids for restoration and remediation of degraded coastal sage soils. 2000.

King County, Department of Research and Technology, Washington State. $100,000 grant awarded to University of Washington: Goal: To investigate odor emissions from biosolids application and the effect of polymers and ash on VOC emissions. 1998.

Northwest Biosolids Management Association, Washington State. $20,000 grant awarded to investigate effect of polymers and ash on VOC emissions from biosolids. 1997.

James River Corporation, Oregon: $10,000 grant was awarded to investigate the success of genetically engineered Poplar trees with resistance to round-up. 1996.

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 8 of 10 October 2021
United State Forest Service, Tahoe National Forest: $15,000 grant was awarded to investigating fire ecology of the Tahoe National Forest. 1995.

Kellogg Foundation, Washington D.C. $500 grant was awarded to construct a large anaerobic digester on St. Kitts in West Indies. 1993
Deposition and/or Trial Testimony:

In the Circuit Court Of The Twentieth Judicial Circuit, St Clair County, Illinois Martha Custer et al., Plaintiff vs. Cerro Flow Products, Inc., Defendants Case No.: No. 0i9-L-2295
Rosenfeld Deposition, 5-14-2021
Trial, October 8-4-2021
In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Joseph Rafferty, Plaintiff vs. Consolidated Rail Corporation and National Railroad Passenger Corporation d/b/a AMTRAK,
Case No.: No. 18-L-6845
Rosenfeld Deposition, 6-28-2021
In the United States District Court For the Northern District of Illinois Theresa Romcoe, Plaintiff vs. Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corporation d/b/a METRA Rail, Defendants
Case No.: No. 17-cv-8517
Rosenfeld Deposition, 5-25-2021
In the Superior Court of the State of Arizona In and For the Cunty of Maricopa Mary Tryon et al., Plaintiff vs. The City of Pheonix v. Cox Cactus Farm, L.L.C., Utah Shelter Systems, Inc.

Case Number CV20127-094749
Rosenfeld Deposition: 5-7-2021
In the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Beaumont Division Robinson, Jeremy et al Plaintiffs, vs. CNA Insurance Company et al.

Case Number 1:17-cv-000508
Rosenfeld Deposition: 3-25-2021
In the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Bernardino Gary Garner, Personal Representative for the Estate of Melvin Garner vs. BNSF Railway Company.

Case No. 1720288
Rosenfeld Deposition 2-23-2021
In the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, Spring Street Courthouse Benny M Rodriguez vs. Union Pacific Railroad, A Corporation, et al.

Case No. 18STCV01162
Rosenfeld Deposition 12-23-2020
In the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri
Karen Cornwell, Plaintiff, vs. Marathon Petroleum, LP, Defendant.

Case No.: 1716-CV10006
Rosenfeld Deposition. 8-30-2019
In the United States District Court For The District of New Jersey Duarte et al, Plaintiffs, vs. United States Metals Refining Company et. al. Defendant.

Case No.: 2:17-cv-01624-ES-SCM
Rosenfeld Deposition. 6-7-2019

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 9 of 10 October 2021
In the United States District Court of Southern District of Texas Galveston Division M/T Carla Maersk, Plaintiffs, vs. Conti 168., Schiffahrts-GMBH & Co. Bulker KG MS “Conti Perdido” Defendant.

Case No.: 3:15-CV-00106 consolidated with 3:15-CV-00237 Rosenfeld Deposition. 5-9-2019
In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Los Angeles – Santa Monica Carole-Taddeo-Bates et al., vs. Ifran Khan et al., Defendants Case No.: No. BC615636
Rosenfeld Deposition, 1-26-2019
In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Los Angeles – Santa Monica The San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments et al. vs El Adobe Apts. Inc. et al., Defendants Case No.: No. BC646857
Rosenfeld Deposition, 10-6-2018; Trial 3-7-19

In United States District Court For The District of Colorado Bells et al. Plaintiff vs. The 3M Company et al., Defendants Case No.: 1:16-cv-02531-RBJ
Rosenfeld Deposition, 3-15-2018 and 4-3-2018
In The District Court Of Regan County, Texas, 112th Judicial District Phillip Bales et al., Plaintiff vs. Dow Agrosciences, LLC, et al., Defendants Cause No.: 1923
Rosenfeld Deposition, 11-17-2017
In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Contra Costa Simons et al., Plaintiffs vs. Chevron Corporation, et al., Defendants Cause No C12-01481
Rosenfeld Deposition, 11-20-2017
In The Circuit Court Of The Twentieth Judicial Circuit, St Clair County, Illinois Martha Custer et al., Plaintiff vs. Cerro Flow Products, Inc., Defendants Case No.: No. 0i9-L-2295
Rosenfeld Deposition, 8-23-2017
In United States District Court For The Southern District of Mississippi Guy Manuel vs. The BP Exploration et al., Defendants
Case: No 1:19-cv-00315-RHW
Rosenfeld Deposition, 4-22-2020
In The Superior Court of the State of California, For The County of Los Angeles Warrn Gilbert and Penny Gilber, Plaintiff vs. BMW of North America LLC Case No.: LC102019 (c/w BC582154)
Rosenfeld Deposition, 8-16-2017, Trail 8-28-2018
In the Northern District Court of Mississippi, Greenville Division Brenda J. Cooper, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Meritor Inc., et al., Defendants Case Number: 4:16-cv-52-DMB-JVM
Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2017

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 10 of 10 October 2021
In The Superior Court of the State of Washington, County of Snohomish Michael Davis and Julie Davis et al., Plaintiff vs. Cedar Grove Composting Inc., Defendants Case No.: No. 13-2-03987-5
Rosenfeld Deposition, February 2017
Trial, March 2017
In The Superior Court of the State of California, County of Alameda Charles Spain., Plaintiff vs. Thermo Fisher Scientific, et al., Defendants Case No.: RG14711115
Rosenfeld Deposition, September 2015
In The Iowa District Court In And For Poweshiek County
Russell D. Winburn, et al., Plaintiffs vs. Doug Hoksbergen, et al., Defendants Case No.: LALA002187
Rosenfeld Deposition, August 2015
In The Circuit Court of Ohio County, West Virginia
Robert Andrews, et al. v. Antero, et al.

Civil Action N0. 14-C-30000
Rosenfeld Deposition, June 2015
In The Iowa District Court For Muscatine County
Laurie Freeman et. al. Plaintiffs vs. Grain Processing Corporation, Defendant Case No 4980
Rosenfeld Deposition: May 2015
In the Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit, in and For Broward County, Florida Walter Hinton, et. al. Plaintiff, vs. City of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, a Municipality, Defendant.

Case Number CACE07030358 (26)
Rosenfeld Deposition: December 2014
In the County Court of Dallas County Texas
Lisa Parr et al, Plaintiff, vs. Aruba et al, Defendant.

Case Number cc-11-01650-E
Rosenfeld Deposition: March and September 2013
Rosenfeld Trial: April 2014
In the Court of Common Pleas of Tuscarawas County Ohio
John Michael Abicht, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Republic Services, Inc., et al., Defendants Case Number: 2008 CT 10 0741 (Cons. w/ 2009 CV 10 0987) Rosenfeld Deposition: October 2012
In the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama, Northern Division James K. Benefield, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. International Paper Company, Defendant.

Civil Action Number 2:09-cv-232-WHA-TFM
Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2010, June 2011
In the Circuit Court of Jefferson County Alabama
Jaeanette Moss Anthony, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Drummond Company Inc., et al., Defendants Civil Action No. CV 2008-2076
Rosenfeld Deposition: September 2010
In the United States District Court, Western District Lafayette Division Ackle et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Citgo Petroleum Corporation, et al., Defendants.

Case Number 2:07CV1052
Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2009
This page intentionally left blank.

Appendix C. Updated Air Quality Computer Modeling
This page intentionally left blank.

Hitco Proposed
Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - Added parking to adjust lot acreage
Construction Phase - adjusted coating to simultaneous with last third of building construction Demolition -
Grading -
Vehicle Trips - Adjusted consistent with TIA
Trips and VMT - Revised to reflect truckload estimate for HAZ-1 and 4 truck loads with 51 mile trip Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation -

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
8 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 33

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Southern California Edison
Operational Year 2024
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
390.98 CH4 Intensity 0.033
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.004
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 35 Date: 1/18/2023 9:17 AM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.0 Emissions Summary
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 69.00
tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 1,588.00
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripLength 20.00 21.30
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 199.00 228.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 2.21 10.84
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 6.42 4.75
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 0.70 10.84
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.09 4.75
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 9.74 10.84
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 3.93 4.75
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 35 Date: 1/18/2023 9:17 AM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2023 0.2796 2.4472 2.8293 6.9200e0030.5501 0.1005 0.6506 0.1703 0.0942 0.2645 0.0000 627.3791 627.3791 0.0915 0.0276 637.8952 2024 0.9544 0.3022 0.4670 9.7000e0040.0340 0.0132 0.0472 9.1200e0030.0125 0.0216 0.0000 86.6363 86.6363 0.0134 2.1300e00387.6062 Maximum 0.9544 2.4472 2.8293 6.9200e0030.5501 0.1005 0.6506 0.1703 0.0942 0.2645 0.0000 627.3791 627.3791 0.0915 0.0276 637.8952 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2023 0.2796 2.4472 2.8293 6.9200e0030.3767 0.1005 0.4772 0.1115 0.0942 0.2057 0.0000 627.3787 627.3787 0.0915 0.0276 637.8948 2024 0.9544 0.3022 0.4670 9.7000e0040.0340 0.0132 0.0472 9.1200e0030.0125 0.0216 0.0000 86.6363 86.6363 0.0134 2.1300e00387.6061 Maximum 0.9544 2.4472 2.8293 6.9200e0030.3767 0.1005 0.4772 0.1115 0.0942 0.2057 0.0000 627.3787 627.3787 0.0915 0.0276 637.8948 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 35 Date: 1/18/2023 9:17 AM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 29.68 0.00 24.84 32.77 0.00 20.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 1-2-2023 4-1-2023 0.8254 0.8254
2 4-2-2023 7-1-2023 0.6229 0.6229
3 7-2-2023 10-1-2023 0.6298 0.6298
4 10-2-2023 1-1-2024 0.6352 0.6352
5 1-2-2024 4-1-2024 0.6530 0.6530
6 4-2-2024 7-1-2024 0.5881 0.5881
Highest 0.8254 0.8254
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 35 Date: 1/18/2023 9:17 AM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 0.7923 2.0000e0052.4800e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0050.0000 4.8400e0034.8400e0031.0000e0050.0000 5.1500e003 Energy 0.0207 0.1885 0.1583 1.1300e0030.0143 0.0143 0.0143 0.0143 0.0000 505.4054 505.4054 0.0293 6.8300e003508.1735 Mobile 0.5876 0.7142 6.5135 0.0147 1.5605 0.0106 1.5711 0.4163 9.8800e0030.4262 0.0000 1,380.263 5 1,380.263
5 0.0886 0.0568 1,399.391
2 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 47.4126 0.0000 47.4126 2.8020 0.0000 117.4627 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 13.8327 102.8310 116.6636 1.4294 0.0346 162.7097 Total 1.4006 0.9027 6.6743 0.0158 1.5605 0.0250 1.5855 0.4163 0.0242 0.4405 61.2453 1,988.504 7 2,049.750
0 4.3493 0.0982 2,187.742
3 Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 35 Date: 1/18/2023 9:17 AM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 35 Date: 1/18/2023 9:17 AM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 4 Building Construction Building Construction 3/11/2023 1/26/2024 5 230 5 Paving Paving 1/27/2024 2/23/2024 5 20
6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 2/24/2024 5/30/2024 5 69 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 286,290; Non-Residential Outdoor: 95,430; Striped Parking Area: 10,663 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 15
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 20
Acres of Paving: 4.08
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 35 Date: 1/18/2023 9:17 AM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Water Exposed Area
Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 1,349.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 6 15.00 0.00 228.00 14.70 6.90 21.30 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 154.00 60.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 31.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 35 Date: 1/18/2023 9:17 AM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 1.4200e0030.0928 0.0236 3.9000e0040.0116 5.6000e0040.0122 3.1900e0035.3000e0043.7200e0030.0000 39.3415 39.3415 2.1700e0036.2500e00341.2575 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.8000e0043.8000e0045.1200e0031.0000e0051.6400e0031.0000e0051.6500e0034.4000e0041.0000e0054.5000e0040.0000 1.3248 1.3248 3.0000e0053.0000e0051.3358 Total 1.9000e0030.0931 0.0287 4.0000e0040.0133 5.7000e0040.0138 3.6300e0035.4000e0044.1700e0030.0000 40.6663 40.6663 2.2000e0036.2800e00342.5932 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0657 0.0000 0.0657 9.9500e0030.0000 9.9500e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0227 0.2148 0.1964 3.9000e0049.9800e0039.9800e0039.2800e0039.2800e0030.0000 33.9920 33.9920 9.5200e0030.0000 34.2300 Total 0.0227 0.2148 0.1964 3.9000e0040.0657 9.9800e0030.0757 9.9500e0039.2800e0030.0192 0.0000 33.9920 33.9920 9.5200e0030.0000 34.2300 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 35 Date: 1/18/2023 9:17 AM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.3 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.9000e0042.3000e0043.0700e0031.0000e0059.9000e0041.0000e0059.9000e0042.6000e0041.0000e0052.7000e0040.0000 0.7949 0.7949 2.0000e0052.0000e0050.8015 Total 2.9000e0042.3000e0043.0700e0031.0000e0059.9000e0041.0000e0059.9000e0042.6000e0041.0000e0052.7000e0040.0000 0.7949 0.7949 2.0000e0052.0000e0050.8015 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0442 0.0000 0.0442 0.0227 0.0000 0.0227 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0133 0.1376 0.0912 1.9000e0046.3300e0036.3300e0035.8200e0035.8200e0030.0000 16.7253 16.7253 5.4100e0030.0000 16.8606 Total 0.0133 0.1376 0.0912 1.9000e0040.0442 6.3300e0030.0506 0.0227 5.8200e0030.0286 0.0000 16.7253 16.7253 5.4100e0030.0000 16.8606 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 35 Date: 1/18/2023 9:17 AM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0709 0.0000 0.0709 0.0343 0.0000 0.0343 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0171 0.1794 0.1475 3.0000e0047.7500e0037.7500e0037.1300e0037.1300e0030.0000 26.0606 26.0606 8.4300e0030.0000 26.2713 Total 0.0171 0.1794 0.1475 3.0000e0040.0709 7.7500e0030.0787 0.0343 7.1300e0030.0414 0.0000 26.0606 26.0606 8.4300e0030.0000 26.2713 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 35 Date: 1/18/2023 9:17 AM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 2.5000e0040.0166 4.1400e0037.0000e0052.0900e0031.0000e0042.1900e0035.7000e0041.0000e0046.7000e0040.0000 7.0625 7.0625 3.9000e0041.1200e0037.4065 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.8000e0043.8000e0045.1200e0031.0000e0051.6400e0031.0000e0051.6500e0034.4000e0041.0000e0054.5000e0040.0000 1.3248 1.3248 3.0000e0053.0000e0051.3358 Total 7.3000e0040.0169 9.2600e0038.0000e0053.7300e0031.1000e0043.8400e0031.0100e0031.1000e0041.1200e0030.0000 8.3873 8.3873 4.2000e0041.1500e0038.7423 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0319 0.0000 0.0319 0.0154 0.0000 0.0154 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0171 0.1794 0.1475 3.0000e0047.7500e0037.7500e0037.1300e0037.1300e0030.0000 26.0606 26.0606 8.4300e0030.0000 26.2713 Total 0.0171 0.1794 0.1475 3.0000e0040.0319 7.7500e0030.0397 0.0154 7.1300e0030.0226 0.0000 26.0606 26.0606 8.4300e0030.0000 26.2713 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 35 Date: 1/18/2023 9:17 AM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1651 1.5104 1.7056 2.8300e0030.0735 0.0735 0.0691 0.0691 0.0000 243.3950 243.3950 0.0579 0.0000 244.8425 Total 0.1651 1.5104 1.7056 2.8300e0030.0735 0.0735 0.0691 0.0691 0.0000 243.3950 243.3950 0.0579 0.0000 244.8425 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 35 Date: 1/18/2023 9:17 AM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 7.1200e0030.2539 0.0950 1.1700e0030.0397 1.2200e0030.0409 0.0115 1.1700e0030.0126 0.0000 114.5480 114.5480 3.8300e0030.0165 119.5563 Worker 0.0513 0.0408 0.5524 1.5400e0030.1772 1.0900e0030.1783 0.0471 1.0000e0030.0481 0.0000 142.8096 142.8096 3.7500e0033.6700e003143.9975 Total 0.0585 0.2947 0.6475 2.7100e0030.2169 2.3100e0030.2192 0.0585 2.1700e0030.0607 0.0000 257.3576 257.3576 7.5800e0030.0202 263.5538 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1651 1.5104 1.7056 2.8300e0030.0735 0.0735 0.0691 0.0691 0.0000 243.3947 243.3947 0.0579 0.0000 244.8422 Total 0.1651 1.5104 1.7056 2.8300e0030.0735 0.0735 0.0691 0.0691 0.0000 243.3947 243.3947 0.0579 0.0000 244.8422 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 35 Date: 1/18/2023 9:17 AM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0147 0.1344 0.1617 2.7000e0046.1300e0036.1300e0035.7700e0035.7700e0030.0000 23.1849 23.1849 5.4800e0030.0000 23.3220 Total 0.0147 0.1344 0.1617 2.7000e0046.1300e0036.1300e0035.7700e0035.7700e0030.0000 23.1849 23.1849 5.4800e0030.0000 23.3220 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 35 Date: 1/18/2023 9:17 AM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 6.6000e0040.0242 8.8600e0031.1000e0043.7800e0031.2000e0043.9000e0031.0900e0031.1000e0041.2000e0030.0000 10.7457 10.7457 3.7000e0041.5500e00311.2161 Worker 4.5600e0033.4700e0030.0490 1.4000e0040.0169 1.0000e0040.0170 4.4800e0039.0000e0054.5700e0030.0000 13.3215 13.3215 3.2000e0043.3000e00413.4264 Total 5.2200e0030.0277 0.0579 2.5000e0040.0207 2.2000e0040.0209 5.5700e0032.0000e0045.7700e0030.0000 24.0671 24.0671 6.9000e0041.8800e00324.6425 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0147 0.1344 0.1617 2.7000e0046.1300e0036.1300e0035.7700e0035.7700e0030.0000 23.1849 23.1849 5.4800e0030.0000 23.3220 Total 0.0147 0.1344 0.1617 2.7000e0046.1300e0036.1300e0035.7700e0035.7700e0030.0000 23.1849 23.1849 5.4800e0030.0000 23.3220 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 35 Date: 1/18/2023 9:17 AM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 9.8800e0030.0953 0.1463 2.3000e0044.6900e0034.6900e0034.3100e0034.3100e0030.0000 20.0265 20.0265 6.4800e0030.0000 20.1885 Paving 5.3400e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0152 0.0953 0.1463 2.3000e0044.6900e0034.6900e0034.3100e0034.3100e0030.0000 20.0265 20.0265 6.4800e0030.0000 20.1885 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 35 Date: 1/18/2023 9:17 AM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.4000e0043.4000e0044.7700e0031.0000e0051.6400e0031.0000e0051.6500e0034.4000e0041.0000e0054.5000e0040.0000 1.2976 1.2976 3.0000e0053.0000e0051.3078 Total 4.4000e0043.4000e0044.7700e0031.0000e0051.6400e0031.0000e0051.6500e0034.4000e0041.0000e0054.5000e0040.0000 1.2976 1.2976 3.0000e0053.0000e0051.3078 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 9.8800e0030.0953 0.1463 2.3000e0044.6900e0034.6900e0034.3100e0034.3100e0030.0000 20.0265 20.0265 6.4800e0030.0000 20.1884 Paving 5.3400e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0152 0.0953 0.1463 2.3000e0044.6900e0034.6900e0034.3100e0034.3100e0030.0000 20.0265 20.0265 6.4800e0030.0000 20.1884 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 35 Date: 1/18/2023 9:17 AM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 3.1700e0032.4100e0030.0340 1.0000e0040.0117 7.0000e0050.0118 3.1100e0036.0000e0053.1800e0030.0000 9.2515 9.2515 2.2000e0042.3000e0049.3244 Total 3.1700e0032.4100e0030.0340 1.0000e0040.0117 7.0000e0050.0118 3.1100e0036.0000e0053.1800e0030.0000 9.2515 9.2515 2.2000e0042.3000e0049.3244 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 0.9094 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 6.2400e0030.0421 0.0625 1.0000e0042.1000e0032.1000e0032.1000e0032.1000e0030.0000 8.8087 8.8087 5.0000e0040.0000 8.8211 Total 0.9156 0.0421 0.0625 1.0000e0042.1000e0032.1000e0032.1000e0032.1000e0030.0000 8.8087 8.8087 5.0000e0040.0000 8.8211 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 35 Date: 1/18/2023 9:17 AM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 35 Date: 1/18/2023 9:17 AM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.5876 0.7142 6.5135 0.0147 1.5605 0.0106 1.5711 0.4163 9.8800e0030.4262 0.0000 1,380.263 5 1,380.263
5 0.0886 0.0568 1,399.391
2 Unmitigated 0.5876 0.7142 6.5135 0.0147 1.5605 0.0106 1.5711 0.4163 9.8800e0030.4262 0.0000 1,380.263 5 1,380.263
5 0.0886 0.0568 1,399.391
2 4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH General Office Building 0.542464 0.063735 0.188241 0.126899 0.023249 0.006239 0.010717 0.008079 0.000923 0.000604 0.024795 0.000702 0.003352 Manufacturing 0.542464 0.063735 0.188241 0.126899 0.023249 0.006239 0.010717 0.008079 0.000923 0.000604 0.024795 0.000702 0.003352 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 35 Date: 1/18/2023 9:17 AM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Parking Lot 0.542464 0.063735 0.188241 0.126899 0.023249 0.006239 0.010717 0.008079 0.000923 0.000604 0.024795 0.000702 0.003352

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 300.2134 300.2134 0.0253 3.0700e003301.7621 Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 300.2134 300.2134 0.0253 3.0700e003301.7621 NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0207 0.1885 0.1583 1.1300e0030.0143 0.0143 0.0143 0.0143 0.0000 205.1920 205.1920 3.9300e0033.7600e003206.4114 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.0207 0.1885 0.1583 1.1300e0030.0143 0.0143 0.0143 0.0143 0.0000 205.1920 205.1920 3.9300e0033.7600e003206.4114

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 35 Date: 1/18/2023 9:17 AM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

0.0203 0.1841 0.1546 1.1000e0030.0140 0.0140 0.0140 0.0140 0.0000 200.3626 200.3626 3.8400e0033.6700e003201.5533 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0207 0.1885 0.1583 1.1300e0030.0143 0.0143 0.0143 0.0143 0.0000 205.1920 205.1920 3.9300e0033.7600e003206.4114 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 35 Date: 1/18/2023 9:17 AM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

0.0203 0.1841 0.1546 1.1000e0030.0140 0.0140 0.0140 0.0140 0.0000 200.3626 200.3626 3.8400e0033.6700e003201.5533 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0207 0.1885 0.1583 1.1300e0030.0143 0.0143 0.0143 0.0143 0.0000 205.1920 205.1920 3.9300e0033.7600e003206.4114 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 26 of 35 Date: 1/18/2023 9:17 AM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
General Office
Building
134900 23.9239 2.0200e0032.4000e00424.0473
Manufacturing 1.49571e
+006
265.2579 0.0224 2.7100e003266.6263
Parking Lot 62203.7 11.0316 9.3000e0041.1000e00411.0885 Total 300.2134 0.0253 3.0600e003301.7621
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 28 of 35 Date: 1/18/2023 9:17 AM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.7923 2.0000e0052.4800e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0050.0000 4.8400e0034.8400e0031.0000e0050.0000 5.1500e003 Unmitigated 0.7923 2.0000e0052.4800e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0050.0000 4.8400e0034.8400e0031.0000e0050.0000 5.1500e003

0.0909 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.7012 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 2.3000e0042.0000e0052.4800e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0050.0000 4.8400e0034.8400e0031.0000e0050.0000 5.1500e003 Total 0.7923 2.0000e0052.4800e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0050.0000 4.8400e0034.8400e0031.0000e0050.0000 5.1500e003 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 29 of 35 Date: 1/18/2023 9:17 AM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

0.0909 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.7012 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 2.3000e0042.0000e0052.4800e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0050.0000 4.8400e0034.8400e0031.0000e0050.0000 5.1500e003 Total 0.7923 2.0000e0052.4800e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0050.0000 4.8400e0034.8400e0031.0000e0050.0000 5.1500e003 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 30 of 35 Date: 1/18/2023 9:17 AM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 116.6636 1.4294 0.0346 162.7097
Unmitigated 116.6636 1.4294 0.0346 162.7097

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
General Office
Building

1.77734 /

1.08934

6.8145 0.0584 1.4300e0038.7021
Manufacturing 41.8239 /
0 109.8492 1.3710 0.0332 154.0077
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 116.6636 1.4294 0.0346 162.7097
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 31 of 35 Date: 1/18/2023 9:17 AM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
General Office
Building

1.77734 /

1.08934

6.8145 0.0584 1.4300e0038.7021
Manufacturing 41.8239 /
0 109.8492 1.3710 0.0332 154.0077
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 116.6636 1.4294 0.0346 162.7097
Mitigated

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 32 of 35 Date: 1/18/2023 9:17 AM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 47.4126 2.8020 0.0000 117.4627
Unmitigated 47.4126 2.8020 0.0000 117.4627
Category/Year

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
General Office
Building

9.3 1.8878 0.1116 0.0000 4.6770
Manufacturing 224.27 45.5248 2.6904 0.0000 112.7857
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 47.4126 2.8020 0.0000 117.4627
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 33 of 35 Date: 1/18/2023 9:17 AM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
General Office
Building

9.3 1.8878 0.1116 0.0000 4.6770
Manufacturing 224.27 45.5248 2.6904 0.0000 112.7857
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 47.4126 2.8020 0.0000 117.4627
Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

11.0 Vegetation
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 35 of 35 Date: 1/18/2023 9:17 AM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Hitco Proposed
Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - Added parking to adjust lot acreage
Construction Phase - adjusted coating to simultaneous with last third of building construction Demolition -
Grading -
Vehicle Trips - Adjusted consistent with TIA
Trips and VMT - Revised to reflect truckload estimate for HAZ-1 and 4 truck loads with 51 mile trip Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation -

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
8 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 33

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Southern California Edison
Operational Year 2024
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
390.98 CH4 Intensity 0.033
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.004
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 28 Date: 1/18/2023 9:16 AM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.0 Emissions Summary
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 69.00
tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 1,588.00
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripLength 20.00 21.30
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 199.00 228.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 2.21 10.84
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 6.42 4.75
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 0.70 10.84
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.09 4.75
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 9.74 10.84
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 3.93 4.75
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 28 Date: 1/18/2023 9:16 AM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2023 2.7171 30.3194 22.7167 0.0798 19.8582 1.2672 21.1254 10.1558 1.1659 11.3217 0.0000 8,233.618 3 8,233.618
3 1.2921 0.6918 8,472.079
7 2024 26.6312 16.0585 22.2344 0.0528 2.1057 0.6349 2.7406 0.5672 0.5972 1.1644 0.0000 5,266.624 6 5,266.624
6 0.7174 0.2034 5,344.237
9 Maximum 26.6312 30.3194 22.7167 0.0798 19.8582 1.2672 21.1254 10.1558 1.1659 11.3217 0.0000 8,233.618 3 8,233.618
3 1.2921 0.6918 8,472.079
7 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2023 2.7171 30.3194 22.7167 0.0798 9.0469 1.2672 10.3141 4.5995 1.1659 5.7653 0.0000 8,233.618 3 8,233.618
3 1.2921 0.6918 8,472.079
7 2024 26.6312 16.0585 22.2344 0.0528 2.1057 0.6349 2.7406 0.5672 0.5972 1.1644 0.0000 5,266.624 6 5,266.624
6 0.7174 0.2034 5,344.237
9 Maximum 26.6312 30.3194 22.7167 0.0798 9.0469 1.2672 10.3141 4.5995 1.1659 5.7653 0.0000 8,233.618 3 8,233.618
3 1.2921 0.6918 8,472.079
7 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 28 Date: 1/18/2023 9:16 AM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 49.22 0.00 45.30 51.82 0.00 44.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 28 Date: 1/18/2023 9:16 AM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 4.3421 1.8000e0040.0199 0.0000 7.0000e0057.0000e0057.0000e0057.0000e0050.0427 0.0427 1.1000e0040.0455 Energy 0.1136 1.0328 0.8676 6.2000e0030.0785 0.0785 0.0785 0.0785 1,239.372 6 1,239.372
6 0.0238 0.0227 1,246.737
6 Mobile 3.3220 3.5779 36.4729 0.0833 8.7445 0.0585 8.8031 2.3293 0.0544 2.3836 8,640.133 7 8,640.133
7 0.5272 0.3271 8,750.788
9 Total 7.7777 4.6109 37.3603 0.0895 8.7445 0.1371 8.8816 2.3293 0.1329 2.4622 9,879.549 0 9,879.549
0 0.5511 0.3498 9,997.571
9 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 4.3421 1.8000e0040.0199 0.0000 7.0000e0057.0000e0057.0000e0057.0000e0050.0427 0.0427 1.1000e0040.0455 Energy 0.1136 1.0328 0.8676 6.2000e0030.0785 0.0785 0.0785 0.0785 1,239.372 6 1,239.372
6 0.0238 0.0227 1,246.737
6 Mobile 3.3220 3.5779 36.4729 0.0833 8.7445 0.0585 8.8031 2.3293 0.0544 2.3836 8,640.133 7 8,640.133
7 0.5272 0.3271 8,750.788
9 Total 7.7777 4.6109 37.3603 0.0895 8.7445 0.1371 8.8816 2.3293 0.1329 2.4622 9,879.549 0 9,879.549
0 0.5511 0.3498 9,997.571
9 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 28 Date: 1/18/2023 9:16 AM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 1/2/2023 1/27/2023 5 20
2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 1/28/2023 2/10/2023 5 10 3 Grading Grading 2/11/2023 3/10/2023 5 20
4 Building Construction Building Construction 3/11/2023 1/26/2024 5 230 5 Paving Paving 1/27/2024 2/23/2024 5 20
6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 2/24/2024 5/30/2024 5 69 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 286,290; Non-Residential Outdoor: 95,430; Striped Parking Area: 10,663 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 15
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 20
Acres of Paving: 4.08
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 28 Date: 1/18/2023 9:16 AM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Water Exposed Area
Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads
Grading Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 1,349.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 6 15.00 0.00 228.00 14.70 6.90 21.30 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 154.00 60.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 31.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 28 Date: 1/18/2023 9:16 AM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 14.5995 0.0000 14.5995 2.2105 0.0000 2.2105 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.2691 21.4844 19.6434 0.0388 0.9975 0.9975 0.9280 0.9280 3,746.984 0 3,746.984
0 1.0494 3,773.218
3 Total 2.2691 21.4844 19.6434 0.0388 14.5995 0.9975 15.5970 2.2105 0.9280 3.1385 3,746.984 0 3,746.984
0 1.0494 3,773.218
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.1463 8.8015 2.3492 0.0395 1.1807 0.0555 1.2362 0.3237 0.0531 0.3768 4,334.742 4 4,334.742
4 0.2389 0.6884 4,545.843
3 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0480 0.0335 0.5436 1.4800e0030.1677 1.0100e0030.1687 0.0445 9.3000e0040.0454 151.8919 151.8919 3.7800e0033.4600e003153.0181 Total 0.1943 8.8350 2.8928 0.0409 1.3483 0.0565 1.4049 0.3682 0.0540 0.4222 4,486.634 3 4,486.634
3 0.2427 0.6918 4,698.861
4 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 28 Date: 1/18/2023 9:16 AM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 6.5698 0.0000 6.5698 0.9947 0.0000 0.9947 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.2691 21.4844 19.6434 0.0388 0.9975 0.9975 0.9280 0.9280 0.0000 3,746.984 0 3,746.984
0 1.0494 3,773.218
3 Total 2.2691 21.4844 19.6434 0.0388 6.5698 0.9975 7.5673 0.9947 0.9280 1.9227 0.0000 3,746.984 0 3,746.984
0 1.0494 3,773.218
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.1463 8.8015 2.3492 0.0395 1.1807 0.0555 1.2362 0.3237 0.0531 0.3768 4,334.742 4 4,334.742
4 0.2389 0.6884 4,545.843
3 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0480 0.0335 0.5436 1.4800e0030.1677 1.0100e0030.1687 0.0445 9.3000e0040.0454 151.8919 151.8919 3.7800e0033.4600e003153.0181 Total 0.1943 8.8350 2.8928 0.0409 1.3483 0.0565 1.4049 0.3682 0.0540 0.4222 4,486.634 3 4,486.634
3 0.2427 0.6918 4,698.861
4 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 28 Date: 1/18/2023 9:16 AM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.3 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 19.6570 0.0000 19.6570 10.1025 0.0000 10.1025 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.6595 27.5242 18.2443 0.0381 1.2660 1.2660 1.1647 1.1647 3,687.308 1 3,687.308
1 1.1926 3,717.121
9 Total 2.6595 27.5242 18.2443 0.0381 19.6570 1.2660 20.9230 10.1025 1.1647 11.2672 3,687.308 1 3,687.308
1 1.1926 3,717.121
9 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0576 0.0402 0.6523 1.7800e0030.2012 1.2100e0030.2024 0.0534 1.1200e0030.0545 182.2703 182.2703 4.5400e0034.1500e003183.6218 Total 0.0576 0.0402 0.6523 1.7800e0030.2012 1.2100e0030.2024 0.0534 1.1200e0030.0545 182.2703 182.2703 4.5400e0034.1500e003183.6218 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 28 Date: 1/18/2023 9:16 AM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.3 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.8457 0.0000 8.8457 4.5461 0.0000 4.5461 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.6595 27.5242 18.2443 0.0381 1.2660 1.2660 1.1647 1.1647 0.0000 3,687.308 1 3,687.308
1 1.1926 3,717.121
9 Total 2.6595 27.5242 18.2443 0.0381 8.8457 1.2660 10.1117 4.5461 1.1647 5.7108 0.0000 3,687.308 1 3,687.308
1 1.1926 3,717.121
9 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0576 0.0402 0.6523 1.7800e0030.2012 1.2100e0030.2024 0.0534 1.1200e0030.0545 182.2703 182.2703 4.5400e0034.1500e003183.6218 Total 0.0576 0.0402 0.6523 1.7800e0030.2012 1.2100e0030.2024 0.0534 1.1200e0030.0545 182.2703 182.2703 4.5400e0034.1500e003183.6218 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 28 Date: 1/18/2023 9:16 AM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 7.0916 0.0000 7.0916 3.4261 0.0000 3.4261 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.7109 17.9359 14.7507 0.0297 0.7749 0.7749 0.7129 0.7129 2,872.691 0 2,872.691
0 0.9291 2,895.918
2 Total 1.7109 17.9359 14.7507 0.0297 7.0916 0.7749 7.8665 3.4261 0.7129 4.1390 2,872.691 0 2,872.691
0 0.9291 2,895.918
2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0255 1.5709 0.4118 7.0800e0030.2125 9.9900e0030.2225 0.0583 9.5500e0030.0678 778.1849 778.1849 0.0429 0.1236 816.0841 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0480 0.0335 0.5436 1.4800e0030.1677 1.0100e0030.1687 0.0445 9.3000e0040.0454 151.8919 151.8919 3.7800e0033.4600e003153.0181 Total 0.0736 1.6044 0.9554 8.5600e0030.3802 0.0110 0.3912 0.1027 0.0105 0.1132 930.0768 930.0768 0.0467 0.1270 969.1023 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 28 Date: 1/18/2023 9:16 AM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 3.1912 0.0000 3.1912 1.5417 0.0000 1.5417 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.7109 17.9359 14.7507 0.0297 0.7749 0.7749 0.7129 0.7129 0.0000 2,872.691 0 2,872.691
0 0.9291 2,895.918
2 Total 1.7109 17.9359 14.7507 0.0297 3.1912 0.7749 3.9661 1.5417 0.7129 2.2547 0.0000 2,872.691 0 2,872.691
0 0.9291 2,895.918
2 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0255 1.5709 0.4118 7.0800e0030.2125 9.9900e0030.2225 0.0583 9.5500e0030.0678 778.1849 778.1849 0.0429 0.1236 816.0841 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0480 0.0335 0.5436 1.4800e0030.1677 1.0100e0030.1687 0.0445 9.3000e0040.0454 151.8919 151.8919 3.7800e0033.4600e003153.0181 Total 0.0736 1.6044 0.9554 8.5600e0030.3802 0.0110 0.3912 0.1027 0.0105 0.1132 930.0768 930.0768 0.0467 0.1270 969.1023 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 28 Date: 1/18/2023 9:16 AM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0691 2.3030 0.8922 0.0112 0.3843 0.0116 0.3959 0.1107 0.0111 0.1217 1,201.694 8 1,201.694
8 0.0403 0.1728 1,254.186
7 Worker 0.4931 0.3438 5.5805 0.0152 1.7214 0.0104 1.7317 0.4565 9.5600e0030.4661 1,559.423 7 1,559.423
7 0.0388 0.0355 1,570.986
1 Total 0.5622 2.6468 6.4727 0.0264 2.1057 0.0220 2.1276 0.5672 0.0206 0.5878 2,761.118 5 2,761.118
5 0.0791 0.2083 2,825.172
8 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 28 Date: 1/18/2023 9:16 AM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0691 2.3030 0.8922 0.0112 0.3843 0.0116 0.3959 0.1107 0.0111 0.1217 1,201.694 8 1,201.694
8 0.0403 0.1728 1,254.186
7 Worker 0.4931 0.3438 5.5805 0.0152 1.7214 0.0104 1.7317 0.4565 9.5600e0030.4661 1,559.423 7 1,559.423
7 0.0388 0.0355 1,570.986
1 Total 0.5622 2.6468 6.4727 0.0264 2.1057 0.0220 2.1276 0.5672 0.0206 0.5878 2,761.118 5 2,761.118
5 0.0791 0.2083 2,825.172
8 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 28 Date: 1/18/2023 9:16 AM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Total 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0670 2.3077 0.8732 0.0110 0.3843 0.0117 0.3960 0.1107 0.0112 0.1218 1,183.647 6 1,183.647
6 0.0404 0.1704 1,235.424
0 Worker 0.4596 0.3070 5.1944 0.0148 1.7214 9.9600e0031.7313 0.4565 9.1700e0030.4657 1,527.278 0 1,527.278
0 0.0351 0.0331 1,538.006
2 Total 0.5266 2.6147 6.0676 0.0258 2.1057 0.0216 2.1273 0.5672 0.0203 0.5875 2,710.925 7 2,710.925
7 0.0756 0.2034 2,773.430
3 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 28 Date: 1/18/2023 9:16 AM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 0.0000 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Total 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 0.0000 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0670 2.3077 0.8732 0.0110 0.3843 0.0117 0.3960 0.1107 0.0112 0.1218 1,183.647 6 1,183.647
6 0.0404 0.1704 1,235.424
0 Worker 0.4596 0.3070 5.1944 0.0148 1.7214 9.9600e0031.7313 0.4565 9.1700e0030.4657 1,527.278 0 1,527.278
0 0.0351 0.0331 1,538.006
2 Total 0.5266 2.6147 6.0676 0.0258 2.1057 0.0216 2.1273 0.5672 0.0203 0.5875 2,710.925 7 2,710.925
7 0.0756 0.2034 2,773.430
3 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 28 Date: 1/18/2023 9:16 AM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Paving 0.5345 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.5226 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0448 0.0299 0.5060 1.4400e0030.1677 9.7000e0040.1686 0.0445 8.9000e0040.0454 148.7609 148.7609 3.4200e0033.2200e003149.8058 Total 0.0448 0.0299 0.5060 1.4400e0030.1677 9.7000e0040.1686 0.0445 8.9000e0040.0454 148.7609 148.7609 3.4200e0033.2200e003149.8058 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 28 Date: 1/18/2023 9:16 AM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 0.0000 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Paving 0.5345 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.5226 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 0.0000 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0448 0.0299 0.5060 1.4400e0030.1677 9.7000e0040.1686 0.0445 8.9000e0040.0454 148.7609 148.7609 3.4200e0033.2200e003149.8058 Total 0.0448 0.0299 0.5060 1.4400e0030.1677 9.7000e0040.1686 0.0445 8.9000e0040.0454 148.7609 148.7609 3.4200e0033.2200e003149.8058 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 28 Date: 1/18/2023 9:16 AM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 26.3579 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 26.5387 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0925 0.0618 1.0456 2.9800e0030.3465 2.0100e0030.3485 0.0919 1.8500e0030.0937 307.4391 307.4391 7.0700e0036.6500e003309.5987 Total 0.0925 0.0618 1.0456 2.9800e0030.3465 2.0100e0030.3485 0.0919 1.8500e0030.0937 307.4391 307.4391 7.0700e0036.6500e003309.5987 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 28 Date: 1/18/2023 9:16 AM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 26.3579 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 26.5387 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0925 0.0618 1.0456 2.9800e0030.3465 2.0100e0030.3485 0.0919 1.8500e0030.0937 307.4391 307.4391 7.0700e0036.6500e003309.5987 Total 0.0925 0.0618 1.0456 2.9800e0030.3465 2.0100e0030.3485 0.0919 1.8500e0030.0937 307.4391 307.4391 7.0700e0036.6500e003309.5987 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 28 Date: 1/18/2023 9:16 AM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

4.2 Trip Summary Information

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.1136 1.0328 0.8676 6.2000e0030.0785 0.0785 0.0785 0.0785 1,239.372 6 1,239.372
6 0.0238 0.0227 1,246.737
6 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.1136 1.0328 0.8676 6.2000e0030.0785 0.0785 0.0785 0.0785 1,239.372 6 1,239.372
6 0.0238 0.0227 1,246.737
6 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 28 Date: 1/18/2023 9:16 AM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
General Office
Building
247.945 2.6700e0030.0243 0.0204 1.5000e0041.8500e0031.8500e0031.8500e0031.8500e00329.1700 29.1700 5.6000e0045.3000e00429.3434 Manufacturing 10286.7 0.1109 1.0085 0.8471 6.0500e0030.0767 0.0767 0.0767 0.0767 1,210.202 6 1,210.202
6 0.0232 0.0222 1,217.394
2 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.1136 1.0328 0.8676 6.2000e0030.0785 0.0785 0.0785 0.0785 1,239.372 6 1,239.372
6 0.0238 0.0227 1,246.737
6 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 28 Date: 1/18/2023 9:16 AM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

0.247945 2.6700e0030.0243 0.0204 1.5000e0041.8500e0031.8500e0031.8500e0031.8500e00329.1700 29.1700 5.6000e0045.3000e00429.3434 Manufacturing 10.2867 0.1109 1.0085 0.8471 6.0500e0030.0767 0.0767 0.0767 0.0767 1,210.202 6 1,210.202
6 0.0232 0.0222 1,217.394
2 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.1136 1.0328 0.8676 6.2000e0030.0785 0.0785 0.0785 0.0785 1,239.372 6 1,239.372
6 0.0238 0.0227 1,246.737
6 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 28 Date: 1/18/2023 9:16 AM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 4.3421 1.8000e0040.0199 0.0000 7.0000e0057.0000e0057.0000e0057.0000e0050.0427 0.0427 1.1000e0040.0455 Unmitigated 4.3421 1.8000e0040.0199 0.0000 7.0000e0057.0000e0057.0000e0057.0000e0050.0427 0.0427 1.1000e0040.0455

0.4983 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

3.8420 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 1.8300e0031.8000e0040.0199 0.0000 7.0000e0057.0000e0057.0000e0057.0000e0050.0427 0.0427 1.1000e0040.0455 Total 4.3421 1.8000e0040.0199 0.0000 7.0000e0057.0000e0057.0000e0057.0000e0050.0427 0.0427 1.1000e0040.0455 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 26 of 28 Date: 1/18/2023 9:16 AM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

0.4983 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

3.8420 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 1.8300e0031.8000e0040.0199 0.0000 7.0000e0057.0000e0057.0000e0057.0000e0050.0427 0.0427 1.1000e0040.0455 Total 4.3421 1.8000e0040.0199 0.0000 7.0000e0057.0000e0057.0000e0057.0000e0050.0427 0.0427 1.1000e0040.0455 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 27 of 28 Date: 1/18/2023 9:16 AM Hitco Proposed - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

11.0 Vegetation

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

1 GARDENA INDUSTRIAL CENTER PROJECT

MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
Terms and Definitions:

1. Property Owner/Developer – Gardena Owner LP

2. Environmental Equivalent/Timing – Any Mitigation Measure and timing thereof, subject to the approval of the City of Gardena, which will have the same or superior result and will have the same or superior effect on the environment. The Community Development Department, in conjunction with any appropriate agencies or City departments, shall determine the adequacy of any proposed “environmental equivalent/timing” and, if determined necessary, may refer said determination to the Planning Commission. Any costs associated with information required in order to make a determination of environmental equivalency/timing shall be borne by the property owner/developer.

Staff time for reviews will be charged on a time and materials basis at the rate in the City’s adopted fee schedule.

3. Timing – This is the point where a mitigation measure must be monitored for compliance. In the case where multiple action items are indicated, it is the first point where compliance associated with the mitigation measure must be monitored. Once the initial action item has been complied with, no additional monitoring pursuant to the Mitigation Monitoring Program will occur because routine City practices and procedures will ensure that the intent of the measure has been complied with. For example, if the timing is “to be shown on approved building plans” subsequent to issuance of the building permit consistent with the approved plans will be final building and zoning inspections pursuant to the building permit to ensure compliance.

4. Responsibility for Monitoring – Shall mean that compliance with the subject mitigation measure(s) shall be reviewed and determined adequate by all departments listed for each mitigation measure.

5. Ongoing Mitigation Measures – The mitigation measures that are designated to occur on an ongoing basis as part of this mitigation monitoring program will be monitored in the form of an annual letter from the property owner/developer in January of each year stating how compliance with the subject measures(s) has been achieved. When compliance with a measure has been demonstrated for a period of one year, monitoring of the measure will be deemed to be satisfied and no further monitoring will occur. For measures that are to be monitored “Ongoing During Construction,” the annual letter will review those measures only while construction is occurring. Monitoring will be discontinued after construction is completed.

6. Building Permit – For purposes of this mitigation monitoring program, a building permit shall be defined as any permit issued for construction of a new building or structural expansion or modification of any existing building but shall not include any permits required for interior tenant improvements or minor additions to an existing structure or building. 2 Timing Mitigation Measure Responsible for Monitoring Completion

GEOLOGY AND SOILS
Prior to issuance of
grading permit
GEO-1 Prior to issuance of a grading permit, grading plans shall be prepared in conformance with the grading recommendations included in the Geotechnical Report prepared for the proposed project (see Appendix I of the Initial Study).

Community Development, Building
and Safety Division
Prior to ground-disturbing
activities
GEO-2 Prior to commencement of ground-disturbing activities, a qualified vertebrate paleontologist (as defined by the Society for Vertebrate Paleontology) shall develop Worker Awareness and Environmental Program (WEAP) Training for construction personnel This training shall be presented to construction personnel and include what fossil remains may be found within the Project area and policies and procedures that must be followed in case of a discovery.

Verification of the WEAP Training shall be provided to the Gardena Community Development Department.

Community Development, Building
and Safety Division
During ground-disturbing
activities
GEO-3 If fossils or fossil bearing deposits are encountered during ground-disturbing activities, work within a 25-foot radius of the find shall halt and a professional vertebrate paleontologist (as defined by the Society for Vertebrate Paleontology) shall be contacted immediately to evaluate the find. The paleontologist shall have the authority to stop or divert construction, as necessary. Documentation and treatment of the discovery shall occur in accordance with Society of Vertebrate Paleontology standards. The significance of the find shall be evaluated pursuant to the State CEQA Guidelines. If the discovery proves to be significant, before construction activities resume at the location of the find, additional work such as data recovery excavation may be warranted, as deemed necessary by the paleontologist and fulltime paleontological monitoring shall occur for the remainder of ground disturbance for the Project.

Community Development, Building
and Safety Division
3 Timing Mitigation Measure Responsible for Monitoring Completion

HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Prior to issuance of
building permit
HAZ-1 Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Project Applicant shall prepare and implement a Remedial Action Plan or other remedial cleanup program document reviewed and approved by LARWQCB (collectively referred to as the “RAP”) in compliance with Water Board Resolution No. 92-49. Subject to the LARWQCB’s requirements, the RAP shall present the scope of work and schedule to remediate and mitigate all impacted shallow soils to the criteria protective of human health and the environment, including groundwater quality. The results of the remedial efforts shall be documented in a report that will be submitted to the LARWQCB.

The Remedial Cleanup Program required as mitigation for this project is for the shallow VOC impacted soils on site. Additional remediation for deeper soils and groundwater may be required for this site by LARWQCB, but is not required as part of the mitigation for this project to proceed. However, appropriate access for monitoring, sampling and remediation for impacted deeper soils and impacted groundwater shall be maintained and shall not be affected by the proposed project.Prior to issuance of grading permits, a Soil Management Plan (SMP) shall be submitted to the City which shall identify the procedures to manage unknown environmental concerns that might be encountered during redevelopment. This document shall also be submitted to the LARWQCB. The SMP does not need to be approved by the LARWQCB or the City.

A Vapor Intrusion Mitigation System (VIMS) Design Plan shall be prepared that presents the proposed design and construction details of the vapor mitigation system and submitted to the City along with construction documents. A VIMS Performance Plan should accompany the VIMS Design Plan and will present baseline indoor air sampling details that will be collected once the building is constructed. The baseline sampling, compared to subsequent sampling results, will provide evidence that the VIMS is performing adequately and that no human health risks are present for site occupancy. The VIMS Performance Plan will include the baseline and startup sampling procedures, on-going performance monitoring, and operation, monitoring, and maintenance (OM&M) operations. The VIMS Performance Plan will also provide contingencies for further mitigation if unfavorable vapor concentrations are discovered. Following completion of these tasks, the Project Applicant will request a determination from the LARWQCB that no further sampling/monitoring be required.

Prior to issuance of a temporary or final Certificate of Occupancy, a Land Use Covenant (LUC) shall be recorded with the Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder restricting the property to be used only for industrial and/or commercial uses. Proof or recording shall be provided to the City. Prior to recording, the LUC shall be presented to the LARWQCB for review and approval.

Community Development, Building
and Safety Division
4 Timing Mitigation Measure Responsible for Monitoring Completion

TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES
Prior to issuance of
grading permit
TCR-1 Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall retain a Native American Monitor Prior to Commencement of Ground-Disturbing Activities:

A. The project applicant shall retain a Native American Monitor from or approved by the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation. The monitor shall be retained prior to the commencement of any “ground-disturbing activity” for the subject project at all project locations (i.e., both on-site and any off-site locations that are included in the project description/definition and/or required in connection with the project, such as public improvement work). “Ground-disturbing activity” shall include, but is not limited to, demolition, pavement removal, potholing, auguring, grubbing, tree removal, boring, grading, excavation, drilling, and trenching.

B. A copy of the executed monitoring agreement shall be submitted to the lead agency prior to the earlier of the commencement of any ground-disturbing activity, or the issuance of any permit necessary to commence a ground-disturbing activity.

C. The monitor will complete daily monitoring logs that will provide descriptions of the relevant ground-disturbing activities, the type of construction activities performed, locations of ground-disturbing activities, soil types, cultural-related materials, and any other facts, conditions, materials, or discoveries of significance to the Tribe. Monitor logs will identify and describe any discovered TCRs, including but not limited to, Native American cultural and historical artifacts, remains, places of significance, etc., (collectively, tribal cultural resources, or “TCR”), as well as any discovered Native American (ancestral) human remains and burial goods. Copies of monitor logs will be provided to the project applicant/lead agency upon written request to the Tribe.

D. On-site tribal monitoring shall conclude upon the latter of the following (1) written confirmation to the Kizh from a designated point of contact for the project applicant/lead agency that all ground-disturbing activities and phases that may involve ground-disturbing activities on the project site or in connection with the project are complete; or (2) a determination and written notification by the Kizh to the project applicant/lead agency that no future, planned construction activity and/or development/construction phase at the project site possesses the potential to impact Kizh TCRs.

E. Upon discovery of any TCRs, all construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the discovery shall cease (i.e., not less than the surrounding 50 feet) and shall not resume until the discovered TCR has been fully assessed by the Kizh monitor and/or Kizh archaeologist. The Kizh will recover and retain all discovered TCRs in the form and/or manner the Tribe deems appropriate, in the Tribe’s sole discretion, and for any purpose the Tribe deems appropriate, including for educational, cultural and/or historic purposes.
.

Community Development, Building
and Safety Division
5 Timing Mitigation Measure Responsible for Monitoring Completion Prior to issuance of
grading permit
TCR-2 Prior to issuance of grading permit, the following notes shall be listed on the grading plans for the project:

Unanticipated Discovery of Human Remains and Associated Funerary Objects A. Native American human remains are defined in PRC 5097.98 (d)(1) as an inhumation or cremation, and in any state of decomposition or skeletal completeness. Funerary objects, called associated grave goods in Public Resources Code, Section 5097.98, are also to be treated according to this statute.

B. If Native American human remains and/or grave goods discovered or recognized on the project site, then all construction activities shall immediately cease. Health and Safety Code, Section 7050.5, dictates that any discoveries of human skeletal material shall be immediately reported to the County Coroner and all ground-disturbing activities shall immediately halt and shall remain halted until the coroner has determined the nature of the remains. If the coroner recognizes the human remains to be those of a Native American or has reason to believe they are Native American, he or she shall contact, by telephone within 24 hours, the Native American Heritage Commission, and Public Resources Code, Section 5097.98, shall be followed.

C. Human remains and grave/burial goods shall be treated alike per California Public Resources Code section 5097.98(d)(1) and (2).

D. Construction activities may resume in other parts of the project site at a minimum of 200 feet away from discovered human remains and/or burial goods, if the Kizh determines in its sole discretion that resuming construction activities at that distance is acceptable and provides the project manager express consent of that determination (along with any other mitigation measures the Kizh monitor and/or archaeologist deems necessary). (CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f).)
E. Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment for discovered human remains and/or burial goods.

F. Any discovery of human remains/burial goods shall be kept confidential to prevent further disturbance.

Community Development, Building
and Safety Division
6 Prior to issuance of
grading permit
TCR-3 Prior to issuance of grading permit, the following notes shall be listed on the grading plans for the project:

Procedures for Burials and Funerary Remains
A. As the Most Likely Descendant (“MLD”), the Koo-nas-gna Burial Policy shall be implemented. To the Tribe, the term “human remains” encompasses more than human bones. In ancient as well as historic times, Tribal Traditions included, but were not limited to, the preparation of the soil for burial, the burial of funerary objects with the deceased, and the ceremonial burning of human remains.

B. If the discovery of human remains includes four or more burials, the discovery location shall be treated as a cemetery and a separate treatment plan shall be created.

C. The prepared soil and cremation soils are to be treated in the same manner as bone fragments that remain intact. Associated funerary objects are objects that, as part of the death rite or ceremony of a culture, are reasonably believed to have been placed with individual human remains either at the time of death or later; other items made exclusively for burial purposes or to contain human remains can also be considered as associated funerary objects. Cremations will either be removed in bulk or by means as necessary to ensure complete recovery of all sacred materials.

D. In the case where discovered human remains cannot be fully documented and recovered on the same day, the remains will be covered with muslin cloth and a steel plate that can be moved by heavy equipment placed over the excavation opening to protect the remains. If this type of steel plate is not available, a 24- hour guard should be posted outside of working hours. The Tribe will make every effort to recommend diverting the project and keeping the remains in situ and protected. If the project cannot be diverted, it may be determined that burials will be removed.

E. In the event preservation in place is not possible despite good faith efforts by the project applicant/developer and/or landowner, before ground-disturbing activities may resume on the project site, the landowner shall arrange a designated site location within the footprint of the project for the respectful reburial of the human remains and/or ceremonial objects.

F. Each occurrence of human remains and associated funerary objects will be stored using opaque cloth bags. All human remains, funerary objects, sacred objects and objects of cultural patrimony will be removed to a secure container on site if possible. These items should be retained and reburied within six months of recovery. The site of reburial/repatriation shall be on the project site but at a location agreed upon between the Tribe and the landowner at a site to be protected in perpetuity. There shall be no publicity regarding any cultural materials recovered.

G. The Tribe will work closely with the project’s qualified archaeologist to ensure that the excavation is treated carefully, ethically and respectfully. If data recovery is approved by the Tribe, documentation shall be prepared and shall Community Development, Building
and Safety Division
7 Timing Mitigation Measure Responsible for Monitoring Completion include (at a minimum) detailed descriptive notes and sketches. All data recovery data recovery-related forms of documentation shall be approved in advance by the Tribe. If any data recovery is performed, once complete, a final report shall be submitted to the Tribe and the NAHC. The Tribe does not authorize any scientific study or the utilization of any invasive and/or destructive diagnostics on human remains.
.
8 This page intentionally left blank.

OFFICIAL USE ONLY fax: 949 863 0851 tel: 949 863 1770 email: [email protected] 92612 hpa, inc. Owner: Project: Consultants: Project Number: Revision: Date: Drawn by: Title: Sheet: Civil: Structural: Mechanical: Plumbing: Electrical: Landscape: Soils Engineer: Fire Protection: - THIENES-- RPM GARDENA, CA 21023 X.L. HUNTER-- 11/08/2021 18831 bardeen avenue - ste. #100 irvine, ca OMP GARDENA INDUSTRIAL CENTER 1600 WEST 135TH STREET CAUTION : IF THIS SHEET IS NOT A 30" X 42" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT 19700 Vermont Ave. Suite 101 Torance, CA 90502 PROJECT DATA VICINITY MAP OVERALL SITE PLAN DAB-A1.1 SITE SITE PLAN KEYNOTES SITE PLAN GENERAL NOTES SITE PLAN GENERAL NOTES PROPERTY OWNER ADDRESS OF THE PROPERTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER LEGAL DESCRIPTION APPLICANT APPLICANT'S RESPRESENTATIVE ZONING fax: 949 863 0851 tel: 949 863 1770 email: [email protected] 92612 hpa, inc. Owner: Project: Consultants: Project Number: Revision: Date: Drawn by: Title: Sheet: Civil: Structural: Mechanical: Plumbing: Electrical: Landscape: Soils Engineer: Fire Protection: - THIENES-- RPM GARDENA, CA 21023 X.L. HUNTER-- 11/08/2021 18831 bardeen avenue - ste. #100 irvine, ca OMP GARDENA INDUSTRIAL CENTER 1600 WEST 135TH STREET CAUTION : IF THIS SHEET IS NOT A 30" X 42" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT 19700 Vermont Ave. Suite 101 Torance, CA 90502 OVERALL FLOOR PLAN DAB-A2.1 KEYNOTES - FLOOR PLAN GENERAL NOTES-FLOOR PLAN FLOOR SLAB AND POUR STRIPS REQ.

ELEVATION DAB-A3.1 fax: 949 863 0851 tel: 949 863 1770 email: [email protected] 92612 hpa, inc. Owner: Project: Consultants: Project Number: Revision: Date: Drawn by: Title: Sheet: Civil: Structural: Mechanical: Plumbing: Electrical: Landscape: Soils Engineer: Fire Protection: - THIENES-- RPM GARDENA, CA 21023 X.L. HUNTER-- 11/08/2021 18831 bardeen avenue - ste. #100 irvine, ca OMP GARDENA INDUSTRIAL CENTER 1600 WEST 135TH STREET CAUTION : IF THIS SHEET IS NOT A 30" X 42" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT 19700 Vermont Ave. Suite 101 Torance, CA 90502 KEYNOTES - ELEVATIONS COLOR SCHED. - ELEVATIONS GLAZING LEGEND ELEVATION DAB-A3.2 fax: 949 863 0851 tel: 949 863 1770 email: [email protected] 92612 hpa, inc. Owner: Project: Consultants: Project Number: Revision: Date: Drawn by: Title: Sheet: Civil: Structural: Mechanical: Plumbing: Electrical: Landscape: Soils Engineer: Fire Protection: - THIENES-- RPM GARDENA, CA 21023 X.L. HUNTER-- 11/08/2021 18831 bardeen avenue - ste. #100 irvine, ca OMP GARDENA INDUSTRIAL CENTER 1600 WEST 135TH STREET CAUTION : IF THIS SHEET IS NOT A 30" X 42" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT 19700 Vermont Ave. Suite 101 Torance, CA 90502 KEYNOTES - ELEVATIONS COLOR SCHED. - ELEVATIONS GLAZING LEGEND Details AD-1 fax: 949 863 0851 tel: 949 863 1770 email: [email protected] 92612 hpa, inc. Owner: Project: Consultants: Project Number: Revision: Date: Drawn by: Title: Sheet: Civil: Structural: Mechanical: Plumbing: Electrical: Landscape: Soils Engineer: Fire Protection: - THIENES-- RPM GARDENA, CA 21023 X.L. HUNTER-- 11/08/2021 18831 bardeen avenue - ste. #100 irvine, ca OMP GARDENA INDUSTRIAL CENTER 1600 WEST 135TH STREET CAUTION : IF THIS SHEET IS NOT A 30" X 42" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT 19700 Vermont Ave. Suite 101 Torance, CA 90502

WEST 135TH STREET Brisbane Box Tristania conferta TREES SYMBOL BOTANICAL/COMMON NAME PLANTING LEGEND SIZE QTY WUCOLS REMARKS 15 Gal 40 M Yew Pine Podocarpus gracilior Pistacia chinensis Chinese Pistache Olive Olea europaea 24" Box 12 M Standard 6 L Multi 24" Box 8 L Standard Standard 48" Box 24" Box Crape Myrtle Lagerstroemia i 'Muskogee' 17 M GROUNDCOVER 5 Gal Agave Agave villmoriniana L 5 Gal Red Yucca Hesperaloe parviflora L 5 Gal Desert Spoon Dasylerion wheeleri L SYMBOL BOTANICAL/COMMON NAME SIZE WUCOLS REMARKS BOTANICAL/COMMON NAME WUCOLS SHRUBS SYMBOL SIZE REMARKS L Leucophyllum f. 'Green Cloud' Texas Ranger 5 Gal Westingia fruticosa L Coast Rosemary 5 Gal L Salvia greggii 5 Gal Autumn Sage L Rosmarinus o. 'Tuscan Blue' 5 Gal Rosemary L Senna artemisioides Feathery Cassia 5 Gal ACCENTS 5 Gal L Toyon Heteromeles arbutifolia QTY 74QTY 238 175 197 206 221 3431 5 Gal M Pineapple Guava Fiejoa sellowiana 484 5 Gal L Dwarf Callistemon Callistemon 'Little John' 192 5 Gal Century Plant Agave americana 18 L 1 Gal Echiveria Echiveria 'Afterglow 80 L Fortnight Lily Dietes bicolor 5 Gal 28 ML Pennisetum orientale 5 Gal Oriental Fountain Grass 101 L Pennisetum s. 'Rubrum' 5 Gal 45 Purple Fountain Grass Acacia redolens 'Low Boy' 1 Gal 6' O.C. Acacia GROUNDCOVER Rosa 'Flower Carpet' Red 1 Gal 30" O.C. Baccharis pilularis 1 Gal 30" O.C. Coyote Bush LLL SYMBOL BOTANICAL/COMMON NAME SIZE SPACING WUCOLS L Carpet Rose 1 Gal 36" O.C. Fountain Grass Pennisetum s. 'Orientale' Senecio mandraliscae 1 Gal 24" O.C. L Senecio Pennisetum 'Little Bunny' 1 Gal 18" O.C. Little Bunny Fountain Grass L Hall's Honeysuckle Lonicera j 'Halliana' 1 Gal 30" O.C. L REMARKS 1 Gal 36" O.C. L Fountain Grass Pennisetum s. 'Rubrum' 1 Gal 4' O.C. Myoporum pacificum Myoporum L Cupressus sempervirens Italian Cypress 24" Box 4 M Standard Juniperus s. 'Skyrocket' Skyrocket Juniper 24" Box 10 M Standard Standard Gardena, California 21-150 10.25.21 1600 W 135th Street OMP 0 15' 30' 60' 711 FEE ANA STREET 714.986.2400 FAX 714.986.2408 PLACENTIA, CA 92870 N 11.08.21 FC-1 SITE PHOTOMETRIC fax: 949 863 0851 tel: 949 863 1770 email: [email protected] 92612 hpa, inc. Owner: Project: Consultants: Project Number: Revision: Date: Drawn by: Title: Sheet: Civil: Structural: Mechanical: Plumbing: Electrical: Landscape: Soils Engineer: Fire Protection:
- THIENES-- RPM GARDENA, CA 21-XXX RPM HUNTER-- 18831 bardeen avenue - ste. #100 irvine, ca OMP GARDENA INDUSTRIAL CENTER 1600 WEST 135TH STREET CAUTION : IF THIS SHEET IS NOT A 30" X 42" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT 19700 Vermont Ave. Suite 101 Torance, CA 9050211/08/21 SITE PHOTOMETRIC 1 N

EXHIBIT E

CITY OF GARDENA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT #18-21, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #7-21, AND SITE PLAN REVIEW #9-21 1600 and 1606 W. 135th Street (APNs: 6102-013-026, 027)

GENERAL CONDITIONS
GC 1. The applicant accepts all of the conditions of approval set forth in this document and shall sign the acknowledgement. A copy of the signed document shall be submitted to the Community Development Department prior to issuance of any construction permit.

GC 2. Development of this site shall comply with the requirements and regulations of Title 15 (Building and Construction) and Title 18 (Zoning) of the Gardena Municipal Code.

GC 3. The applicant shall comply with all written policies, resolutions, ordinances, and all applicable laws in effect at time of approval. The conditions of approval shall supersede all conflicting notations, specifications, and dimensions which may be shown on the project development plans.

GC 4. The floor plan layout shall be in accordance with the plans approved by the Commission on March 7, 2023 and modified by these conditions of approval.

The final completed project shall be in substantial compliance with the plans upon which the Commission based its decision, as modified by such decision.

GC 5. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its agents, officers, and employees from any claims, actions or proceedings, damages, costs (including without limitation attorneys’ fees), injuries, or liabilities against the City or its agents, officers, or employees arising out of the City’s approval of Environmental Assessment #18-21, Conditional Use Permit #7-21, and Site Plan Review #9-21. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding and the City shall cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding, or if the City fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the applicant shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City. Although the applicant is the real party in interest in action, the City may, at its sole discretion, participate in the defense of any action with the attorneys of its own choosing, but such participation shall not relieve the applicant of any obligation under this condition, including the payment of attorneys’ fees.

SITE PLAN REVIEW
SPR1. Site Plan Review #9-21 shall be utilized within a period not to exceed twelve (12) months from the date of approval, unless an extension is granted in accordance with Section 18.44.060 of the Gardena Municipal Code. Utilization shall mean the issuance of building permits.

EA #18-21, CUP #7-21, and SPR #9-21
April 25, 2023

Page 2 ends

Gardena City CouncilApril 25, 2023

Gardena City Council
April 25, 2023