Hanford City Council
June 6, 2023

California, containing approximately 24 medical exam rooms and ten dental rooms (the “Project”).

Mayor Paden opened the public hearing at 8:38 p.m. and called for the staff report. Financial Advisor at California Municipal Finance Authority, Anthony Stubbs, presented the staff report. Mr. Stubbs answered questions from the Council. Javier Diaz, Chief Financial Officer at Family Health Care Network, also answered questions from the Council.

Public comment:

Art Brieno questioned the project funds.

Mayor Paden closed the public hearing at 8:48 p.m.

Motion to Approve.

RESULT:

MOVER:

SECONDER:

AYES:

Passed (UNANIMOUS)
Council Member Diane Sharp
Council Member Kalish Morrow
Diane Sharp, Mark Kairis, Kalish Morrow, Travis Paden, Lou Martinez

GENERAL BUSINESS:

A. Public Works: Approval of the City of Hanford Local Road and Safety Plan City Engineer Lisa Dock presented the Local Road and Safety Plan for the Council's review and consideration. Ms. Dock answered questions from the Council.

Motion to Approve
RESULT:

MOVER:

SECONDER:

AYES:

Passed (UNANIMOUS)
Council Member Mark Kairis
Council Member Diane Sharp
Diane Sharp, Mark Kairis, Kalish Morrow, Travis Paden, Lou Martinez B. Public Works: Adoption of Resolution 23-11-R identifying a “Project List” for Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) gas tax funding for Fiscal Year 2023/24
Council Member Sharp recused herself from the discussion and vote due to a conflict of interest. City Engineer Lisa Dock presented the project list for the Council's review and consideration. Ms. Dock answered questions from the Council.

Motion to Approve
RESULT:

MOVER:

SECONDER:

AYES:

ABSTAIN:

Passed (UNANIMOUS)
Council Member Travis Paden
Council Member Kalish Morrow
Mark Kairis, Kalish Morrow, Travis Paden, Lou Martinez
Diane Sharp

COUNCIL COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS:

At this time, any Council Member may ask a question for clarification, make an announcement, or report briefly on their activities. In addition, subject to Council Policies and Procedures, they may request staff to report back to the Council at a subsequent meeting concerning any matter or take action to direct staff to place a matter of business on a future agenda. (GOV. CODE SEC. 54954.2)
There was a Council consensus to review the City Council Handbook at a future study session, brought forth by Council Member Morrow.

A. Council Future Agenda Items

B. Upcoming Events and Important Dates:

May 1-27: Spring Cleanup Event Kings Waste and Recycling Authority 7803 Hanford - Armona Rd. (Ticket required. Check your April utility bill) May 20: Walk with a Doc Hanford at Freedom Park 2000 9 1/4 Ave., 9:00 a.m. - 10:00 a.m.

May 20 and 27: Free Fitness Court Classes, 9:00 a.m. - 10:00 a.m. at Hidden Valley Park May 27: Reimagining Hidden Valley Park Outreach Event #1, 9 – 11 a.m. at Hidden Valley Park
June 1: Reimagining Hidden Valley Park Outreach Event #2, 6 – 8 p.m. at Civic Auditorium June 3: Carnegie Car Show in Civic Park, 8:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.

June 3: Reimagining Hidden Valley Park Outreach Event #3, 3 - 5 p.m. at Hidden Valley Park June 6: Regular City Council Meeting

ADJOURNMENT:

Mayor Paden adjourned the meeting at 9:13 p.m.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Natalie Corral
Natalie Corral, City Clerk

13.C.

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 6/6/2023 AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR

SUBJECT:

Approval of the City of Hanford salary schedules to reflect the state minimum wage increase for part- time employees and increases approved through the labor negotiation process and Authorization for the City Administration to amend all other documents as may be necessary to implement the updates.

RECOMMENDATION:

Recommendation: That the City Council, by motion, approve the City of Hanford salary schedules to reflect the state minimum wage increase for part-time employees and increases approved through the labor negotiation process and authorize City Administration to amend all other documents as may be necessary to implement the updates.

Recommended Motion:

BACKGROUND:

Pursuant to the California Code of Regulations (CCR) 570.5, the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) requires that a publicly available pay schedule be used to determine pay rates. Additionally, pay rates shall be limited to the amount listed on a pay schedule and must meet all of the following eight requirements:

1. Be duly approved and adopted by the employer's governing body in accordance with requirements of applicable public meetings laws

2. Identify the position title for every employee position

3. Show the pay rate as a single amount or multiple amounts within a range for each identified position

4. Indicate the time base, including, but not limited to, whether the time base is hourly, daily, bi- weekly, monthly, bi-monthly, or annually

5. Be posted at the office of the employer or immediately accessible and available for public review from the employer during normal business hours or posted on the employer's website

6. Indicate an effective date and date of any revisions

7. Is retained by the employer and available for public inspection for not less than five years

8. Does not reference another document in lieu of disclosing the pay rate

Staff intends to continue to obtain City Council approval on a frequent basis to satisfy the requirements set forth by the California Code of Regulations (CCR) 570.5.

FISCAL IMPACT:

THE BARGAINING GROUP INCREASES WERE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL IN 2022, AND THE UPCOMING BUDGET INCLUDES THE NEGOTIATED INCREASES.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. COH Part Time Salary Schedule 2023 -July

2. EMEA & Unrepresented Salary Schedule 7-10-23

3. Fire Salary Schedule 7-10-23

4. GEMA Salary Schedule 7-10-23

5. HPOA Salary Schedule 7-10-23

6. SEIU Salary Schedule 7-10-23

Title
Bargaining
Group
Designation
Overtime
Designation
FLSA
Designation
Airport Manager $25.00 to $25.00 NA 3 40
Airport Operations Attendant $15.50 to $17.50 NA 3 40
Certified Instructor $15.50 to $21.50 NA 3 40
Clerical Support $15.50 to $17.50 NA 3 40
Code Enforcement Officer $15.50 to $17.50 NA 3 40
Community Service Officer $15.50 to $17.50 NA 3 40
Custodian $15.50 to $17.50 NA 3 40
Engineering Technician Aide $15.50 to $17.50 NA 3 40
Facilities Host $15.50 to $17.50 NA 3 40
Fire Inspector $25.00 to $25.00 NA 3 40
Fleet Mechanic (Helper) $15.50 to $23.50 NA 3 40
Graffiti Control Officer $15.50 to $17.50 NA 3 40
Ice Rink Manager $20.00 to $20.00 NA 3 40
Intern $15.50 to $17.50 NA 3 40
Management Intern $15.50 to $20.50 NA 3 40
Meter Reader $15.50 to $17.50 NA 3 40
Paint Program Coordinator/Crew Leader $15.50 to $17.50 NA 3 40 Parking Control Officer $15.50 to $17.50 NA 3 40
Pool Manager $16.50 to $18.50 NA 3 40
Parks/Public Works Laborer $15.50 to $17.50 NA 3 40
Recreation Leader I $15.50 to $16.50 NA 3 40
Recreation Leader II $16.00 to $17.00 NA 3 40
Recreation Leader III $16.50 to $17.50 NA 3 40
Refuse Collector $15.50 to $19.00 NA 3 40
Reserve Police Officer (Level I) $22.24 to $26.40 NA 3 40 Sports Coordinator $22.00 to $22.00 NA 3 40
Sports Official $15.50 to $21.50 NA 3 40
Hourly Rate
Rates listed above go into effect July 10, 2023 (approved by City Council on June 6, 2023) All positions, to which appointments are made for part-time work, as outlined in the Hanford Merit Personnel System Rules and Regulations, may be paid at an hourly rate as high as Step “C/3” of the range to which the position has been allocated. Part-time appointments made at higher than Step “C/3” must be approved by the City Manager. If a part-time employee works more than 1,000 hours in a fiscal year he/she must become a member of CalPERS with the employee and the City making the appropriate contribution as defined by the City’s CalPERS contract. The employee will remain a CalPERS member until termination.

City of Hanford Salary Schedule
(Part-Time Employees)

BARGAINING OVERTIME FLSA SALARY
UNIT JOB TITLE DESIGNATION DESIGNATION RANGE 1/MIN 2 3 4 5/MAX 1/MIN 2 3 4 5/MAX EMEA
Community Development
Director 1 E 167 $11,110 $11,665 $12,249 $12,861 $13,504 64.10 67.30 70.67 74.20 77.91 EMEA Finance Director 1 E 173 $11,793 $12,383 $13,002 $13,652 $14,335 68.04 71.44 75.01 78.76 82.70 EMEA Fire Chief 1 E 173 $11,793 $12,383 $13,002 $13,652 $14,335 68.04 71.44 75.01 78.76 82.70 EMEA
Parks & Community Services
Director 1 E 166 $11,000 $11,550 $12,127 $12,734 $13,371 63.46 66.63 69.97 73.46 77.14 EMEA Police Chief 1 E 179 $12,519 $13,145 $13,802 $14,492 $15,217 72.22 75.84 79.63 83.61 87.79 EMEA Public Works Director 1 E 169 $11,333 $11,900 $12,495 $13,120 $13,776 65.38 68.65 72.09 75.69 79.47 Unrepresented Human Resources Manager 1 E 155 $9,860 $10,353 $10,870 $11,414 $11,984 56.88 59.73 62.71 65.85 69.14 Unrepresented Deputy City Manager 1 E 187 $13,556 $14,234 $14,946 $15,693 $16,478 78.21 82.12 86.23 90.54 95.06 Unrepresented City Manager 1 E 198 $15,124 $15,881 $16,675 $17,508 $18,384 87.26 91.62 96.20 101.01 106.06

MONTHLY SALARY HOURLY SALARY
Salary inceases effective 7-10-23 per bargaining group agreement Please refer to the City of Hanford Salary Schedule Description for Bargaining Group, Overtime and FLSA Designation

BARGAINING OVERTIME FLSA SALARY
UNIT JOB TITLE DESIGNATION DESIGNATION RANGE 1/MIN 2 3 4 5/MAX 1/MIN 2 3 4 5/MAX IAFF Firefighter 4 24 63 $5,526 $5,802 $6,093 $6,397 $6,717 22.77 23.91 25.11 26.36 27.68 IAFF Fire Engineer 4 24 73 $6,104 $6,409 $6,730 $7,066 $7,420 25.15 26.41 27.73 29.12 30.58 IAFF Fire Captain 4 24 90 $7,229 $7,591 $7,970 $8,369 $8,787 29.79 31.28 32.84 34.49 36.21 IAFF Fire Battalion Chief 4 E 111 $8,909 $9,355 $9,823 $10,314 $10,829 36.71 38.55 40.48 42.50 44.63 IAFF Fire Battalion Chief* 1 E 144 $8,837 $9,279 $9,743 $10,230 $10,742 50.98 53.53 56.21 59.02 61.97 Please refer to the City of Hanford Salary Schedule Description for Bargaining Group, Overtime and FLSA Designation

MONTHLY SALARY HOURLY SALARY
*2080 hours worked annually
Salary increases effective 7-10-23 per bargaining group agreement

BARGAINING OVERTIME FLSA SALARY
UNIT JOB TITLE DESIGNATION DESIGNATION RANGE 1/MIN 2 3 4 5/MAX 1/MIN 2 3 4 5/MAX GEMA Accounting Technician I 2 40 72 $4,317 $4,533 $4,759 $4,997 $5,247 24.91 26.15 27.46 28.83 30.27 GEMA Payroll Specialist 2 40 72 $4,317 $4,533 $4,759 $4,997 $5,247 24.91 26.15 27.46 28.83 30.27 GEMA Administrative Specialist 2 40 79 $4,628 $4,860 $5,103 $5,358 $5,626 26.70 28.04 29.44 30.91 32.46 GEMA Human Resources Technician 2 40 79 $4,628 $4,860 $5,103 $5,358 $5,626 26.70 28.04 29.44 30.91 32.46 GEMA Accounting Technician II 2 40 82 $4,769 $5,007 $5,257 $5,520 $5,796 27.51 28.89 30.33 31.85 33.44 GEMA Utility Billing Specialist 1 E 85 $4,913 $5,159 $5,417 $5,688 $5,972 28.35 29.76 31.25 32.81 34.45 GEMA Recycling Coordinator 2 40 86 $4,962 $5,210 $5,471 $5,744 $6,032 28.63 30.06 31.56 33.14 34.80 GEMA Fire Prevention Coordinator 1 E 87 $5,012 $5,262 $5,526 $5,802 $6,092 28.91 30.36 31.88 33.47 35.15 GEMA Parks Supervisor 1 E 88 $5,062 $5,315 $5,581 $5,860 $6,153 29.20 30.66 32.20 33.81 35.50 GEMA Administrative Analyst I 1 E 93 $5,320 $5,586 $5,866 $6,159 $6,467 30.69 32.23 33.84 35.53 37.31 GEMA Fleet Supervisor 1 E 93 $5,320 $5,586 $5,866 $6,159 $6,467 30.69 32.23 33.84 35.53 37.31 GEMA Payroll Analyst 1 E 93 $5,320 $5,586 $5,866 $6,159 $6,467 30.69 32.23 33.84 35.53 37.31 GEMA Recreation Supervisor 1 E 93 $5,320 $5,586 $5,866 $6,159 $6,467 30.69 32.23 33.84 35.53 37.31 GEMA
Regulatory Compliance
Analyst 1 E 93 $5,320 $5,586 $5,866 $6,159 $6,467 30.69 32.23 33.84 35.53 37.31 GEMA Refuse Supervisor 1 E 96 $5,481 $5,756 $6,043 $6,345 $6,663 31.62 33.20 34.87 36.61 38.44 GEMA
Sanitary Sewer Collection
Supervisor 1 E 98 $5,592 $5,871 $6,165 $6,473 $6,797 32.26 33.87 35.57 37.34 39.21 GEMA Code Compliance Supervisor 1 E 99 $5,648 $5,930 $6,226 $6,538 $6,865 32.58 34.21 35.92 37.72 39.60 GEMA Accountant 1 E 100 $5,704 $5,989 $6,289 $6,603 $6,933 32.91 34.55 36.28 38.09 40.00 GEMA Information Systems Specialist 1 E 100 $5,704 $5,989 $6,289 $6,603 $6,933 32.91 34.55 36.28 38.09 40.00 GEMA Streets Supervisor 1 E 100 $5,704 $5,989 $6,289 $6,603 $6,933 32.91 34.55 36.28 38.09 40.00 GEMA Utilities Supervisor 1 E 102 $5,819 $6,110 $6,415 $6,736 $7,073 33.57 35.25 37.01 38.86 40.80 GEMA Administrative Analyst II 1 E 103 $5,877 $6,171 $6,479 $6,803 $7,143 33.90 35.60 37.38 39.25 41.21 GEMA Housing Analyst 1 E 103 $5,877 $6,171 $6,479 $6,803 $7,143 33.90 35.60 37.38 39.25 41.21 GEMA Plans Examiner 1 E 105 $5,995 $6,295 $6,609 $6,940 $7,287 34.59 36.32 38.13 40.04 42.04 GEMA WWTP Supervisor 1 E 105 $5,995 $6,295 $6,609 $6,940 $7,287 34.59 36.32 38.13 40.04 42.04

MONTHLY SALARY HOURLY SALARY

GEMA Assistant Engineer 1 E 106 $6,055 $6,358 $6,676 $7,009 $7,360 34.93 36.68 38.51 40.44 42.46 GEMA Human Resources Analyst I 1 E 106 $6,055 $6,358 $6,676 $7,009 $7,360 34.93 36.68 38.51 40.44 42.46 GEMA Associate Planner 1 E 108 $6,177 $6,485 $6,810 $7,150 $7,508 35.63 37.42 39.29 41.25 43.31 GEMA Building Superintendent 1 E 109 $6,238 $6,550 $6,878 $7,222 $7,583 35.99 37.79 39.68 41.66 43.75 GEMA Fleet Superintendent 1 E 109 $6,238 $6,550 $6,878 $7,222 $7,583 35.99 37.79 39.68 41.66 43.75 GEMA Risk Management Analyst 1 E 109 $6,238 $6,550 $6,878 $7,222 $7,583 35.99 37.79 39.68 41.66 43.75 GEMA Financial Analyst 1 E 113 $6,492 $6,816 $7,157 $7,515 $7,891 37.45 39.32 41.29 43.36 45.52 GEMA Purchasing Agent 1 E 113 $6,492 $6,816 $7,157 $7,515 $7,891 37.45 39.32 41.29 43.36 45.52 GEMA Senior Administrative Analyst 1 E 113 $6,492 $6,816 $7,157 $7,515 $7,891 37.45 39.32 41.29 43.36 45.52 GEMA
Police Support Services
Administrator 1 E 114 $6,557 $6,884 $7,229 $7,590 $7,970 37.83 39.72 41.70 43.79 45.98 GEMA Senior Plans Examiner 1 E 115 $6,622 $6,953 $7,301 $7,666 $8,049 38.20 40.12 42.12 44.23 46.44 GEMA Fire Marshal 1 E 116 $6,688 $7,023 $7,374 $7,743 $8,130 38.59 40.52 42.54 44.67 46.90 GEMA Human Resources Analyst II 1 E 116 $6,688 $7,023 $7,374 $7,743 $8,130 38.59 40.52 42.54 44.67 46.90 GEMA City Clerk 1 E 119 $6,891 $7,236 $7,597 $7,977 $8,376 39.76 41.74 43.83 46.02 48.32 GEMA Information Systems Analyst 1 E 119 $6,891 $7,236 $7,597 $7,977 $8,376 39.76 41.74 43.83 46.02 48.32 GEMA Senior Planner 1 E 120 $6,960 $7,308 $7,673 $8,057 $8,460 40.15 42.16 44.27 46.48 48.81 GEMA Associate Civil Engineer 1 E 121 $7,030 $7,381 $7,750 $8,138 $8,544 40.56 42.58 44.71 46.95 49.30 GEMA Community Relations Manager 1 E 121 $7,030 $7,381 $7,750 $8,138 $8,544 40.56 42.58 44.71 46.95 49.30 GEMA Refuse Manager 1 E 123 $7,171 $7,529 $7,906 $8,301 $8,716 41.37 43.44 45.61 47.89 50.29 GEMA WWTP Manager 1 E 124 $7,243 $7,605 $7,985 $8,384 $8,803 41.78 43.87 46.07 48.37 50.79 GEMA Streets Manager 1 E 125 $7,315 $7,681 $8,065 $8,468 $8,891 42.20 44.31 46.53 48.85 51.30 GEMA Utilities Manager 1 E 125 $7,315 $7,681 $8,065 $8,468 $8,891 42.20 44.31 46.53 48.85 51.30 GEMA Project Manager 1 E 126 $7,388 $7,758 $8,145 $8,553 $8,980 42.62 44.76 46.99 49.34 51.81 GEMA Senior Civil Engineer 1 E 131 $7,765 $8,153 $8,561 $8,989 $9,438 44.80 47.04 49.39 51.86 54.45 GEMA
Information Technology
Manager 1 E 134 $8,000 $8,400 $8,820 $9,261 $9,724 46.16 48.46 50.89 53.43 56.10 GEMA Building Official 1 E 135 $8,080 $8,484 $8,909 $9,354 $9,822 46.62 48.95 51.40 53.97 56.66

GEMA Principal Planner 1 E 135 $8,080 $8,484 $8,909 $9,354 $9,822 46.62 48.95 51.40 53.97 56.66 GEMA Parks and Facilities Manager 1 E 136 $8,161 $8,569 $8,998 $9,448 $9,920 47.08 49.44 51.91 54.50 57.23 GEMA Finance Manager 1 E 140 $8,492 $8,917 $9,363 $9,831 $10,323 49.00 51.44 54.02 56.72 59.55 GEMA Engineering Manager 1 E 144 $8,837 $9,279 $9,743 $10,230 $10,742 50.98 53.53 56.21 59.02 61.97 GEMA Deputy Public Works Director 1 E 154 $9,762 $10,250 $10,763 $11,301 $11,866 56.32 59.13 62.09 65.20 68.46 GEMA City Engineer 1 E 162 $10,571 $11,099 $11,654 $12,237 $12,849 60.99 64.03 67.24 70.60 74.13 Salary increases effective 7-10-23 per bargaining group agreement Please refer to the City of Hanford Salary Schedule Description for Bargaining Group, Overtime and FLSA Designation

BARGAINING OVERTIME FLSA SALARY
UNIT JOB TITLE DESIGNATION DESIGNATION RANGE 1/MIN 2 3 4 5/MAX 1/MIN 2 3 4 5/MAX HPOA Police Cadet 4 40 46 $3,333 $3,500 $3,675 $3,858 $4,051 19.23 20.19 21.20 22.26 23.37 HPOA Police Officer/Investigator* 4 14 107 $6,115 $6,421 $6,742 $7,079 $7,433 35.28 37.05 38.90 40.84 42.88 45.07 47.37 Longevity
HPOA Police Corporal 4 14 117 $6,755 $7,093 $7,448 $7,820 $8,211 38.97 40.92 42.97 45.12 47.37 49.79 HPOA Police Sergeant 4 14 132 $7,843 $8,235 $8,647 $9,079 $9,533 45.25 47.51 49.88 52.38 55.00 57.80 HPOA Police Lieutenant 1 E 146 $9,015 $9,466 $9,939 $10,436 $10,958 52.01 54.61 57.34 60.21 63.22 HPOA Police Captain 1 E 154 $9,762 $10,250 $10,763 $11,301 $11,866 56.32 59.13 62.09 65.20 68.46 Please refer to the City of Hanford Salary Schedule Description for Bargaining Group, Overtime and FLSA Designation

MONTHLY SALARY HOURLY SALARY
Salary increases effective 7-10-23 per bargaining group agreement Specialty Pay
*If EE is receiving specialty pay and is not at step 5/MAX they will receive the pay of the next step in the salary range.

Longevity and/or

BARGAINING OVERTIME FLSA SALARY
UNIT JOB TITLE DESIGNATION DESIGNATION RANGE 1/MIN 2 3 4 5/MAX 1/MIN 2 3 4 5/MAX SEIU Office Assistant I 3 40 38 $3,078 $3,232 $3,393 $3,563 $3,741 17.76 18.65 19.58 20.56 21.58 SEIU Custodian 3 40 45 $3,300 $3,465 $3,638 $3,820 $4,011 19.04 19.99 20.99 22.04 23.14 SEIU Office Assistant II 3 40 48 $3,400 $3,570 $3,748 $3,936 $4,133 19.61 20.60 21.63 22.71 23.84 SEIU Parking Control Officer 3 40 48 $3,400 $3,570 $3,748 $3,936 $4,133 19.61 20.60 21.63 22.71 23.84 SEIU
Community Enhancement
Officer 3 40 55 $3,645 $3,827 $4,019 $4,220 $4,431 21.03 22.08 23.19 24.34 25.56 SEIU Maintenance Worker I 3 40 55 $3,645 $3,827 $4,019 $4,220 $4,431 21.03 22.08 23.19 24.34 25.56 SEIU Senior Custodian 3 40 55 $3,645 $3,827 $4,019 $4,220 $4,431 21.03 22.08 23.19 24.34 25.56 SEIU Police Records Assistant 3 40 56 $3,682 $3,866 $4,059 $4,262 $4,475 21.24 22.30 23.42 24.59 25.82 SEIU Accounting Clerk 3 40 57 $3,718 $3,904 $4,100 $4,305 $4,520 21.45 22.53 23.65 24.83 26.08 SEIU Development Services Assistant 3 40 58 $3,756 $3,943 $4,141 $4,348 $4,565 21.67 22.75 23.89 25.08 26.34 SEIU Meter Reader 3 40 58 $3,756 $3,943 $4,141 $4,348 $4,565 21.67 22.75 23.89 25.08 26.34 SEIU Police Service Technician 3 40 58 $3,756 $3,943 $4,141 $4,348 $4,565 21.67 22.75 23.89 25.08 26.34 SEIU WWTP/OIT 3 40 58 $3,756 $3,943 $4,141 $4,348 $4,565 21.67 22.75 23.89 25.08 26.34 SEIU
Facilities Maintenance
Technician I 3 40 60 $3,831 $4,023 $4,224 $4,435 $4,657 22.10 23.21 24.37 25.59 26.87 SEIU Animal Control Technician 3 40 63 $3,947 $4,145 $4,352 $4,569 $4,798 22.77 23.91 25.11 26.36 27.68 SEIU
Property and Evidence
Technician 3 40 63 $3,947 $4,145 $4,352 $4,569 $4,798 22.77 23.91 25.11 26.36 27.68 SEIU Refuse Collector 3 40 64 $3,987 $4,186 $4,395 $4,615 $4,846 23.00 24.15 25.36 26.63 27.96 SEIU Sweeper Operator 3 40 64 $3,987 $4,186 $4,395 $4,615 $4,846 23.00 24.15 25.36 26.63 27.96 SEIU Maintenance Worker II 3 40 65 $4,027 $4,228 $4,439 $4,661 $4,894 23.23 24.39 25.61 26.89 28.24 SEIU Utilities Maintenance Worker I 3 40 65 $4,027 $4,228 $4,439 $4,661 $4,894 23.23 24.39 25.61 26.89 28.24 SEIU Fleet Mechanic I 3 40 66 $4,067 $4,270 $4,484 $4,708 $4,943 23.46 24.64 25.87 27.16 28.52 SEIU Senior Police Records Assistant 3 40 66 $4,067 $4,270 $4,484 $4,708 $4,943 23.46 24.64 25.87 27.16 28.52 SEIU Administrative Assistant 3 40 67 $4,107 $4,313 $4,528 $4,755 $4,993 23.70 24.88 26.13 27.43 28.80 SEIU
Facilities Maintenance
Technician II 3 40 70 $4,232 $4,444 $4,666 $4,899 $5,144 24.42 25.64 26.92 28.26 29.68 SEIU Heavy Equipment Operator 3 40 70 $4,232 $4,444 $4,666 $4,899 $5,144 24.42 25.64 26.92 28.26 29.68 SEIU Shop and Parts Specialist 3 40 71 $4,274 $4,488 $4,712 $4,948 $5,195 24.66 25.89 27.19 28.55 29.97 SEIU Communications Dispatcher 3 40 73 $4,360 $4,578 $4,807 $5,047 $5,300 25.15 26.41 27.73 29.12 30.58 SEIU
Development Services
Technician 3 40 73 $4,360 $4,578 $4,807 $5,047 $5,300 25.15 26.41 27.73 29.12 30.58

MONTHLY SALARY HOURLY SALARY

SEIU WWTP Operator I 3 40 73 $4,360 $4,578 $4,807 $5,047 $5,300 25.15 26.41 27.73 29.12 30.58 SEIU Refuse Service Worker 3 40 74 $4,404 $4,624 $4,855 $5,098 $5,353 25.41 26.68 28.01 29.41 30.88 SEIU Engineering Technician I 3 40 75 $4,448 $4,670 $4,904 $5,149 $5,406 25.66 26.94 28.29 29.71 31.19 SEIU Landscape Services Technician 3 40 75 $4,448 $4,670 $4,904 $5,149 $5,406 25.66 26.94 28.29 29.71 31.19 SEIU Senior Maintenance Worker 3 40 75 $4,448 $4,670 $4,904 $5,149 $5,406 25.66 26.94 28.29 29.71 31.19 SEIU Utilities Maintenance Worker II 3 40 75 $4,448 $4,670 $4,904 $5,149 $5,406 25.66 26.94 28.29 29.71 31.19 SEIU Fleet Mechanic II 3 40 76 $4,492 $4,717 $4,953 $5,200 $5,460 25.92 27.21 28.57 30.00 31.50 SEIU Administrative Technician 3 40 77 $4,537 $4,764 $5,002 $5,252 $5,515 26.18 27.49 28.86 30.30 31.82 SEIU Housing Program Specialist 3 40 77 $4,537 $4,764 $5,002 $5,252 $5,515 26.18 27.49 28.86 30.30 31.82 SEIU Water Conservation Technician 3 40 77 $4,537 $4,764 $5,002 $5,252 $5,515 26.18 27.49 28.86 30.30 31.82 SEIU Recreation Coordinator 3 40 79 $4,628 $4,860 $5,103 $5,358 $5,626 26.70 28.04 29.44 30.91 32.46 SEIU Senior Refuse Collector 3 40 79 $4,628 $4,860 $5,103 $5,358 $5,626 26.70 28.04 29.44 30.91 32.46 SEIU Computer Technician 3 40 80 $4,675 $4,908 $5,154 $5,412 $5,682 26.97 28.32 29.73 31.22 32.78 SEIU WWTP Operator II 3 40 83 $4,816 $5,057 $5,310 $5,576 $5,854 27.79 29.18 30.63 32.17 33.77 SEIU Construction Inspector I 3 40 85 $4,913 $5,159 $5,417 $5,688 $5,972 28.35 29.76 31.25 32.81 34.45 SEIU Engineering Technician II 3 40 85 $4,913 $5,159 $5,417 $5,688 $5,972 28.35 29.76 31.25 32.81 34.45 SEIU
Senior Utilities Maintenance
Worker 3 40 85 $4,913 $5,159 $5,417 $5,688 $5,972 28.35 29.76 31.25 32.81 34.45 SEIU Senior Fleet Mechanic 3 40 86 $4,962 $5,210 $5,471 $5,744 $6,032 28.63 30.06 31.56 33.14 34.80 SEIU Building Inspector I 3 40 87 $5,012 $5,262 $5,526 $5,802 $6,092 28.91 30.36 31.88 33.47 35.15 SEIU Code Compliance Officer 3 40 87 $5,012 $5,262 $5,526 $5,802 $6,092 28.91 30.36 31.88 33.47 35.15 SEIU Traffic Control Technician 3 40 90 $5,164 $5,422 $5,693 $5,978 $6,277 29.79 31.28 32.84 34.49 36.21 SEIU
Communications Dispatch
Supervisor 3 40 94 $5,373 $5,642 $5,924 $6,220 $6,531 31.00 32.55 34.18 35.89 37.68 SEIU Construction Inspector II 3 40 95 $5,427 $5,699 $5,983 $6,283 $6,597 31.31 32.88 34.52 36.25 38.06 SEIU Building Inspector II 3 40 97 $5,536 $5,813 $6,104 $6,409 $6,729 31.94 33.54 35.21 36.97 38.82 SEIU Assistant Planner 3 40 98 $5,592 $5,871 $6,165 $6,473 $6,797 32.26 33.87 35.57 37.34 39.21 SEIU
Construction
Coordinator/Inspector 3 40 105 $5,995 $6,295 $6,609 $6,940 $7,287 34.59 36.32 38.13 40.04 42.04 Salary increases effective 7-10-23 per bargaining group agreement Please refer to the City of Hanford Salary Schedule Description for Bargaining Group, Overtime and FLSA Designation

13.D.

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 6/6/2023 AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR

SUBJECT:

Second Reading of Ordinance 22-09, approving Prezone 2021-09, a request to prezone the parcel located at 018-242-019, totaling 12.64 acres, as I-H Heavy Industrial, in accordance with the General Plan Designation for the parcel, Heavy Industrial. The project is located south of Iona Avenue, west of 10th Avenue.

RECOMMENDATION:

Recommendation:

Recommended Motion:

BACKGROUND:

FISCAL IMPACT:

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Ordinance 22-09 as amended

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council waive the second reading and adopt Ordinance 22-09, approving Prezone 2021-09.

RECOMMENDED MOTION: I move to waive the second reading and adopt Ordinance 22-09, approving Prezone 2021-09.

BACKGROUND
On December 20, 2022, the City Council held a public hearing for Annexation 159 and Prezone 2021-09 and introduced the ordinance and waived the first reading on the proposed project.

The City Council requested the Annexation and Prezone be amended, only to include the annexation and prezoning of the parcel located at 018-242-019.

Prezone No. 2021-09, as amended, is a request to pre-zone the annexation area I-H Heavy Industrial, in accordance with the General Plan designation for the area. The General Plan Designation for the area is Heavy Industrial.

General Plan Designation (Property outlined in bold)
Heavy Industrial

Proposed: I-H Heavy Industrial
All findings were made by the City Council in accordance with Section 17.86.030 of the Hanford Municipal Code.

In accordance with the Hanford Municipal Code Section 17.86.030, before a zone change may be approved, all of the following findings shall be made by the reviewing authority:

1. That the amendment is internally consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan and the Municipal Code.

Analysis: That Prezone No. 2021-09 is internally consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan, specifically consistent with Land Use Policies L15 and L17. There is not a plan for development at this time, however future development of the project area will be required to conform to the General Plan and Zoning regulations set forth for the I-H Heavy Industrial zone district.

2. That the amendment would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare of the community.

ANALYSIS: That this application has been reviewed by County departments, utility companies, City Fire Department, City Building Department, and other involved departments.

Any mitigation required for public health and safety were applied to the proposal and required in the mitigation monitoring and reporting program.

3. That the amendment would maintain the appropriate balance of land uses within the City.

Analysis: That jobs-housing balance is achieved by increasing opportunities for people to work and live in close proximity. The ratio is expressed as the number of jobs divided by the number of housing units. The jobs-housing balance is a general tool for analyzing where people work, where they live, and how effectively they can travel between the two. In the planning area, the existing jobs-housing balance ratio in 2013-2014 was 1.17. It is estimated that the implementation of the General Plan would increase the jobs-housing balance by 0.45 to 1.62, which would make the planning area a jobs-rich area. The prezone is considered an implementation of the General Plan, which designates the project site as Heavy Industrial.

4. That the anticipated land uses on the subject site would be compatible with existing and future surrounding uses.

Analysis: That there is not a plan for development of the project area, at this time. The anticipated land uses on the subject site would be heavy industrial. Future development would be required to comply with the General Plan and zoning designation for the property. The industrial uses would be compatible with the existing and future surrounding industrial uses.

CC Ordinance Prrezone 2021-09, Page 1 of 3

ORDINANCE NO. 22-09
PREZONE NO. 2021-09

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HANFORD PREZONING

CERTAIN PROPERTY ADJACENT TO THE CITY OF HANFORD FROM COUNTY ZONING

IH HEAVY INDUSTRIAL TO I-H HEAVY INDUSTRIAL, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GENERAL PLAN. THE PROJECT IS LOCATED SOUTH OF IONA AVENUE, WEST OF 10TH AVENUE (APN 018-242-019).

The City Council of the City of Hanford does ordain as follows:

Section 1: The following described territory situated in the City of Hanfor d is hereby prezoned under the terms of Chapter 17.86 of the Hanford Municipal Code:

Annexation 159 filed by Dale G. Mell on behalf of Phylis Parra Estate:

FROM: County zoning of IH Heavy Industrial
TO: City zoning I-H Heavy Industrial
On property described as follows:

Approximately 12.64 acres located at the south half of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 13, Township 19 South, Range 21 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, according to Government Township Plat approved April 15, 1855. Excepting Therefrom the west 50 feet thereof, also excepting therefrom the east 435.6 feet thereof. (APN 018-242-019), as depicted in attached Exhibit A; and
Section 2: The Council does hereby find as a fact that this Ordinance has been recommended for passage by the Planning Commission of the City of Hanford after public hearing before the Planning Commission after notice required by Section 17.70.100 of the Hanford Municipal Code and Government Code Section 65854. The City Council finds that Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2022-62 is approved, in conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act. The City Council hereby finds that the prezoning is required to achieve the objectives of the zoning regulations as set forth in Section 17.06.010 of the Hanford Municipal C ode, and that this Ordinance has been introduced by the City Council after public hearing held on the 20
th day of December 2022 at 7:00 p.m. of said day after notice required under the provisions of Section 65856 of the Government Code.

Section 3: This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its passage, and shall be published once in the Hanford Sentinel within fifteen (15) days after its passage, and the zoning will apply to such property in the event of subsequent annexation to the City under the provisions of Section 65859 of the Government Code.

CC Ordinance Prrezone 2021-09, Page 2 of 3

Passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hanford duly called and held on the ____ day of ________, by the following roll call vote:

ATTEST:

Natalie Corral

APPROVED

_________________________
MAYOR of the City of Hanford

CITY CLERK

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF KINGS ) ss

CITY OF HANFORD )

I, NATALIE CORRAL , City Clerk of the City of Hanford, do hereby certify the foregoing ordinance was duly introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hanford on the 20 th day of December, 2022 and it was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hanford held on the _______ day of ______________, 2023.

Dated: _____________________ _____________________________ Natalie Corral
City Clerk

CC Ordinance Prrezone 2021-09, Page 3 of 3

Exhibit A
Prezone No. 2021-09

Figure 1: Prezone 2021-09
Proposed: I-H Heavy Industrial

13.E.

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 6/6/2023 AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR

SUBJECT:

Approval of an amended annual Contract for 2023-2024, with the Pioneer Union Elementary School District, for their School Resource Officer program

RECOMMENDATION:

Recommendation: That the Council, by motion, approve the contract between the City of Hanford and Pioneer Union Elementary School District, to increase the percentage of service provided, as well as the cost of the School Resource Officer paid by PUESD.

BACKGROUND:

The Pioneer Union Elementary School District (PUESD) currently contracts with the Hanford Police Department for a School Resource Officer (SRO). PUESD currently pays the City of Hanford for thirty percent of one full-time officer to work 13 hours per week at their campuses, at the cost of $27,600 annually. During the thirteen hours per week, the SRO is responsible for maintaining campus safety and security, student mentoring and interventions, handling criminal matters, meeting with parents and deterrence/prevention of crime for PUESD's three campuses. Thirteen hours per week does not allow the officer sufficient time for all that needs to be accomplished. The Hanford Police Department and PUESD wish to increase the contract to fifty percent of one full- time School Resource Officer (SRO) to cover 20 hours per week for the district, at a cost to PUESD of $48,000 annually.

At the current time, we have one full-time Police Sergeant assigned to PUESD to cover the school part-time as contracted. In addition to working part time at the PUESD campuses, the Police Sergeant assigned to this position supervises the seven additional School Resource Officers. He performs all supervisor duties for this unit including evaluations, handling of complaints, approving reports, conducting all administrative reviews and documents, compiling monthly activity reports, and all other necessary supervisory functions. These increased hours will be covered by the Sergeant and will not result in the hiring of any additional personnel.

A copy of the proposed contract has been attached. This contract has previously been reviewed and approved by the city attorney.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The fiscal impact of approving this contract results in $20,400 in salary savings for the City of Hanford.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. SRO Contract Pioneer 2023-2024

PIONEER UNION ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT

SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER PROGRAM

STARTING
FISCAL YEAR 2023 - 2024
This Agreement is made by and between the Pioneer Union Elementary School District (“District”) and the Hanford Police Department, (“Department,”) and replaces all prior agreements and understandings between the District and the Department on the subject of school resource officers (“SRO”) as is dated for reference purposes as of Fiscal year 2023-2024.

Recitals
A. The District and Department desire to set forth the duties and responsibilities of the parties with respect to the SRO program.

B. The District and Department desire to create an atmosphere of cooperation toward the common goals of providing a safe learning environment for students and staff.

C. The District and Department desire to promote positive relationships between the school, police, and the community.

The District and Department agree as follows:

1.Term of Agreement. This Agreement shall be effective upon ratification by the District’s Superintendent and approval by the Hanford City Manager, and shall remain in effect until modified by mutual written agreement or terminated by either party with thirty (30) days advance written notice.

2.Scope of Service. The Department agrees to assign 50% of one full time sworn police officer (20 hours per week) to serve as the SRO at the District’s schools during the school year. The SRO will be assigned to primarily work at Pioneer Middle School or other District locations as directed by the District Superintendent. The SRO will wear the regulation police uniform and operate a marked police patrol vehicle while on duty, unless otherwise authorized by a supervisor for a specific purpose. The SRO’s duties shall include but not be limited to:

2.1. SRO will provide law enforcement expertise to assist the school staff in maintaining safety at school sites.

2.2. The SRO’s investigation and questioning of students at school shall be limited to offenses related to the operation of the school or occurring at the school, except in situations where a delay in investigation or questioning may result in danger to any person, flight from the jurisdiction by the person suspected of a crime, or destruction of evidence.

2 2.3. The SRO shall notify the school principal as soon as practical of any significant law enforcement actions taken by an SRO or other officer.

2.4. The SRO shall not become involved in school administrative searches unless specifically requested by the principal in order to provide security or to handle contraband. School administrative searches will be at the direction and control of the school principal and will be based upon reasonable suspicion.

2.5. The SRO shall be responsible for monitoring the social and cultural environment around District schools to identify existing or emerging youth gangs. Gang prevention and early intervention strategies shall be coordinated between the Department and the District.

2.6. The SRO may become involved, through the school principal, with the school’s curriculum and provide instructional presentations that enhance the students’ understanding of the police mission and the responsibilities of citizenship.

2.7. The SRO will work to prevent juvenile delinquency and campus violence through close contact and positive relationships with students. The SRO will serve as a positive role model to students.

2.8. At the request of the school principal, the SRO shall attend suspension and expulsion hearings. The SRO shall be prepared to provide testimony on any actions taken by the officer and on any personally observed conduct witnessed by the officer. The SRO shall also make available at expulsion hearings any physical evidence that has been seized by law enforcement and is held by the Department.

2.9. The SRO shall disseminate to school administrators and staff information on crime trends and changes in laws to assist them in establishing and maintaining safe school environments.

2.10. The SRO will work to establish and maintain a collaborative partnership with the school administration to provide a safe school environment. The SRO will regularly communicate with the school administration in an effort to share information and discuss issues and concerns of mutual interest.

2.11. The SRO will work to increase communication between law enforcement, students, school staff, and the community. The SRO will work to build positive working relationships with the school staff and parents.

3 3.Student Discipline. The certificated administrators of each school shall be responsible for student discipline and shall make all decisions regarding the imposition of discipline for students enrolled at their campus.

4.Hours of Employment. The SRO will work full time during the school year, except for annual leave allowances, during the normal school year schedule. This does not include coverage for summer school, which can be negotiated upon request by the District at an additional cost.

5.Selection of Law Enforcement Personnel. The Department will be responsible for selecting which Department employee will serve as the SRO, or the acting SRO for days when the designated SRO may be on leave, absent for training, or otherwise not available. The District may provide input regarding the selection of the SRO.

6.Program Criteria. The District and Department will work collaboratively to be responsive to evolving school and law enforcement requirements.

7.Training and Supervision. The SRO shall receive SRO’s work assignments from the Department and shall be supervised in the performance of SRO’s duties by the Chief of the Department or designee. The Department shall be responsible for training the SRO according to applicable law enforcement standards. The Superintendent of the District or designee will provide the Chief of the Department with information to assist in evaluating the SRO. Any disciplinary problems or alleged improprieties involving the SRO shall be brought to the attention of the Chief of the Department or designee. The School Resource Officers will be released to attend 40 hours of formal training related to investigator orientation and juvenile law enforcement each fiscal year. The department will be responsible for the officers’ travel, lodging and meals.

8.Employment. The SRO is an employee of the Department, and is not an employee or agent of the District. The SRO shall be subject to the administration, supervision, and control of the Department. The SRO shall be subject to all personnel policies and practices of the Department.

9.Student Records.

9.1. The parties agree that the SRO shall be deemed to be a “school official” for the performance on SRO’s duties on behalf of District. The SRO shall therefore be allowed access to student records but the District is in direct control of the use, maintenance, and disclosure of student records in accordance with Education Code section 49076 and other applicable provisions of law. School officials shall allow the SRO to inspect and copy any student records maintained by the school for which the SRO has a “legitimate educational interest” within the scope of the SRO’s service under this Agreement. This includes access to student directory

4 information to the extent permitted by District policy, classroom assignments, attendance records, and discipline files. However, the SRO may not inspect or copy confidential student records outside the scope of the SRO’s service, except as allowed by law.

9.2. If confidential student record information is needed in an emergency to protect the health or safety of a student or others, the District may disclose to the SRO information that is needed to respond to the emergency situation based on the seriousness of the threat to someone’s health or safety, the need of the information to meet the emergency situation, and the extent to which time is of the essence.

9.3. If confidential student record information is needed by the SRO but no emergency situation exists, unless section 9.4 applies, the information may be released only upon the issuance of a subpoena, a court order or written authorization of the parent/guardian.

9.4. Pursuant to Education Code section 48902, the principal or designee shall notify the SRO of any acts of a student that may violate specified provisions of the Penal Code and Education Code. This may require the disclosure of the student’s name or other identifying information to the SRO, along with information related to the underlying offence.

10.Law Enforcement Records and Juvenile Case File Information. Pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code sections 827, 828.1 and 828.3, certain law enforcement records, probation reports and juvenile case file information may be provided to the District Superintendent or his/her designee. In addition to providing such information directly to the District Superintendent, the SRO may provide such information to the Principal of the school in which a minor student is enrolled and the Principal shall be a designee of the Superintendent for the receipt of such information.

11.Costs. In exchange for the provision of SRO services, the District shall pay Department as follows $48,000 annually. Overtime expenditures for school related events will be paid for by the Hanford Police Department. Contract extensions and inflation increases to the flat rate will be discussed annually in May. Services during summer school may be negotiated by the District at an additional cost to the District.

12.Feedback and Evaluation. The District and Department agree on the importance of evaluating the SRO program. The District and Department will work together to develop and implement procedures to provide periodic feedback and evaluation data for the purpose of measuring the program’s effectiveness.

13.Nondiscrimination. SROs shall not discriminate against or treat any person differently on the basis race, color, ancestry, nationality, national origin,

5 immigration status, ethnic group identification, ethnicity, age, religion, marital status, pregnancy, parental status, physical or mental disability, sex, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, gender expression, or genetic information; a perception of one or more of such characteristics; or association with a person or group with one or more of these actual or perceived characteristics.

Indemnification.

14.1 The District shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the Department, its officers, agents and employees from and against any and all claims, losses, liabilities or damages, demands and actions, including payment of reasonable attorney’s fees, arising out of or resulting from the performance of this Agreement, caused in whole by any negligent or willful act or omission of the District, its officers, agents, employees, or anyone directly or indirectly acting on behalf of the District.

14.2 The Department shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the District, its officers, agents and employees from and against any and all claims, losses, liabilities or damages, demands and actions, including payment of reasonable attorney’s fees, arising out of or resulting from the performance of this Agreement, caused in whole by any negligent or willful act or omission of the Department, its officers, agents, employees, or anyone directly or indirectly acting on behalf of the Department.

14.3 It is the intention of the District and Department that, where fault is determined to have been contributory, principles of comparative fault will be followed and each party shall bear the proportionate cost of any damage attributable to the fault of that party, its officers, directors, agents, employees, volunteers, subcontractors, and governing board.

14.4 Each party shall immediately notify the other party of any claims or legal actions arising out of the performance of this Agreement.

15.Applicable Laws. Department shall provide the services specified in this Agreement in accordance with any applicable federal and state statutes, regulations, and directives.

16.Amendments. No modification, amendment or addendum to this Agreement shall be valid unless it is set forth in writing and is signed by the parties.

17.Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the District and Department regarding the subject matter of this contract and supersedes all previous SRO agreements.

18.Severability. If any term or provision of this Agreement is determined to be unlawful or in conflict with any law of the State of California, the validity of the

6 remaining portions or provisions shall not be affected. Each term or provision of the Agreement shall be valid and enforced as written to the fullest extent permitted by law.

19.Notices. All notices concerning this Agreement shall be deemed to have been served when delivered via electronic mail to the District Superintendent or Chief of Police.

The parties have executed this Agreement on the date written below.

Pioneer Union Elementary School District
By: Date:

Paul van Loon
Superintendent
Hanford Police Department
By: Date:

Parker Sever, Chief of Police
City of Hanford
By: Date:

Mario Cifuentez, City Manager

13.F.

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 6/6/2023 AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR

SUBJECT:

Approval of an extension to the contract for the FLOCK Camera contract to increase the term from a 2 years to 4 years at the current price of $30,000 annually, for a total saving of $8,500 per contract year.

RECOMMENDATION:

Recommendation: That the City Council, by motion, approve an extension to the contract for the FLOCK Camera contract from a 2-year term to a 4-year term at a cost of $30,000 annually, to achieve savings in the General Fund budget.

Recommended Motion:That the City Council by motion approve the extension of the FLOCK Camera contract from a 2 year contract to a 4 year contract at a cost of $30,000 annually.

BACKGROUND:

The Hanford Police Department was recently approved by council for the installation of flock cameras. That installation is currently being completed. The cameras cost the City $2,500 per camera per year. Flock recently announced a price increase from $500 to $3,000 each annually.

Because we're an existing client, FLOCK is willing to provide an extension of the previous contract price for up to 4 years. This contract extension would save $8,500 in year 3 and $8,500 in year 4. No other details of the previously signed contract would change. This would also save money for several of the community partners that are also contracting with the City for cameras. In that contract, the services can be terminated by the City for any reason with no penalties or fees.

So far, just one of the installed cameras has provided hits on over a dozen stolen vehicles in just the last two weeks. That same camera has also resulted in the arrest of two hit and run suspects and three others for stolen vehicles. Lastly, that unit has assisted in the identification of a shooting suspect and put that suspect in the area of the shooting when it occurred. We also have 4 other cameras that were installed in an area that had the most shootings in Hanford. Since those cameras were installed, the City has had 0 shootings in that area.

This approval would also extend those private contracts at the current rate for those cameras.

However, with these 5 cameras, the contract can be canceled at anytime and for any reason. These cameras are being paid for by private companies. Should they fail to reimburse the City, the City is under no obligation to continue with these contracts and are not liable for the remainder of the contract term.

While they do increase the department's workload, the information and intelligence they provide is invaluable and staff is excited about the additional cameras to be installed and their potential positive impact on crime in the city.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact on the current budget or the next two-year budget cycle, 23/24-24/25.

These cameras have been budgeted at a cost of $30,000 annually (for 12 cameras under city contract and 5 under private contract) and this extension will lock in those costs for another two years. There is a savings of $6,000 for each of the years in the 25/26-26/27 budget cycle and a total of $8,500.00 in savings if you include the 5 private contracts..

ATTACHMENTS:

None

13.G.

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 6/6/2023 AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR

SUBJECT:

Approval of the award of a Construction Contract to Sancon Technologies, Inc. of Huntington Beach, CA, in the amount of $115,245.00, for the FY23 Manhole Repair and Recoating Project and Appropriation of an additional $11,000.00 from the 0362 Wastewater Capital Fund in order to fully fund the project.

RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council, by motion:

1. Award a construction contract to Sancon Technologies, Inc. of Huntington Beach, CA in the amount of $115,245.00 for the FY23 Manhole Repair and Recoating Project.

2. Establish a construction contingency of $11,500.00

3. Appropriate an additional $11,000.00 from the 0362 Wastewater Capital Fund in order to fully fund the project.

BACKGROUND:

This project provides for repair and coating of damaged sanitary sewer manholes where corrosion is affecting concrete surfaces at various locations in the city.

Staff solicitated bids for the project via Hanford Sentinal and the City's electronic bidding system, Bidnet. The Request for Bid process was available for 5 weeks. The received only one (1) bid proposal, which was deemed to be responsive to the RFB process. Staff examined the bid, validated the bidder's contractor's license status, and verified the contractor is in good standing.

Accordingly, City staff is requesting to award the contract to the sole responsive bidder, Sancon Technologies, Inc, in order to expedite the process of delivery of this project before the winter season sets in. With the Council's approval, if awarded, construction is anticipated to begin in July 2023.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The FY23 0362 Waste Water Capital Budget provides $104,284.25 for construction, including contingencies. An additional $11,000.00 from the 0362 Wastewater Capital Fund in order to fully fund the project.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. FY 23 Budget Page - Manhole Repiar

823629
Project Background:

Existing Conditions:

Project Justification:

Fiscal Implications:

Project Budget Summary:
2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Program or Project Construction Construction
Engineering / Inspection 5,000 5,000
Construction 82,000 82,000
Contingency 8,000 8,000
Department Overhead 3,680 8,558
Total Expenditure $0 $98,680 $0 $103,558 $0
Funding
0362 Wastewater Capital 98,680 103,558

Total Funding $0 $98,680 $0 $103,558 $0
ExpenditureRevenue
Manhole Repair and Coating Project
This project provides for repair and coating of damaged sanitary sewer manholes and lift stations where corrosion is affecting concrete surfaces.

In order to limit damage to sewer facilities from corrosion, this project provides for repairing and coating the facilities.

Funding for the Manhole Repair and Coating Project will be allocated from Wastewater Capital Reserves. 5-Year Funding Allocation

13.H.

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 6/6/2023 AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR

SUBJECT:

Approval of the amended Military equipment inventory and usage report consistent with the requirements of AB 481.

RECOMMENDATION:

Recommendation: That the City Council receive the amended Military Equipment Inventory and Usage report, in compliance with the requirements of AB 481

Recommended Motion: Move to acknowledge receipt and approval of the amended Military Equipment Inventory and Usage report.

BACKGROUND:

AB 481 requires all law enforcement agencies to report military equipment and its usage on an annual basis. This bill was codified in Government Code 7072(a) and requires the following.

1. A summary of the military equipment uses and purpose;

2. A summary of the complaints or concerns received concerning the military equipment report;

3. The results of any audits, information on any violations, and actions taken in response;

4. The total annual cost for each type of equipment;

5. The quantity possessed of each type of equipment;

6. The intent to acquire additional equipment and quantity sought

This is the first full year of submitting this report and after reviewing our last staff report we found it lacking in a few areas with regards to the requirements of AB481. Accordingly, city staff is requesting that the City Council approve this amended report.

The Military Policy Attachment is the policy on equipment use and contains a description of all of the equipment, costs, reasons for use and inventory. The annual report attachment documents the equipment deployments and costs for the year.

Attachments CNT, SWAT, SNIPER is the training log and costs for the CrisisNegotiations Team, Special Weapons and Tactics Team and the sniper team for the 2022 year.

Training without a cost identified next to it was in-house training conducted by our department. The total spent on other training was $16,345.55 and all of the classes were POST reimbursable.

During the 2022 Calendar year we also returned 60 military rifles that we had acquired from the

military approx. 10 years ago. These rifles were outdated and no longer usable and had been replaced in the past.

During 2022 as outlined in the annual use report we received no complaints about any of our SWAT deployments and all of our equipment is accounted for. All funds for the acquisition, maintenance and training for the use of the listed military equipment are paid for from the general fund.

In addition to this report, the Hanford Police Department will conduct an information meeting, as required by the statute, on Wednesday June 21st at 5:00pm at the Hanford Police Department located at 425 N. Irwin Street, Hanford,CA, 93230. At that meeting, the general public may ask questions regarding the annual military equipment report and the law enforcement agency's funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment.

FISCAL IMPACT:

ATTACHMENTS:

1. MILITARY_EQUIPMENT

2. SWAT

3. SNIPERS

4. CNT

5. ANNUAL USE REPORT

Policy
705
Hanford Police Department
Hanford PD Policy
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2023/05/22, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Hanford Police Department ***DRAFT*** MILITARY EQUIPMENT - 1

MILITARY EQUIPMENT
705.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE
The purpose of this policy is to provide guidelines for the approval, acquisition, use and reporting requirements of military equipment (Government Code § 7070; Government Code § 7071; Government Code § 7072).
705.1.1 DEFINITIONS
Definitions related to this policy include (Government Code § 7070):

Governing body – The elected or appointed body that oversees the Department.

POST –Police Officers Standards and Training
Military equipment – Includes but is not limited to the following items or as amended in California Government Code Section 7070:
• Unmanned, remotely piloted, powered aerial or ground vehicles. • Mine-resistant ambush-protected (MRAP) vehicles or armored personnel carriers. • High mobility multipurpose wheeled vehicles (HMMWV), two-and-one-half-ton trucks, five-ton trucks, or wheeled vehicles that have a breaching or entry apparatus attached. • Tracked armored vehicles that provide ballistic protection to their occupants. • Command and control vehicles that are either built or modified to facilitate the operational control and direction of public safety units. • Weaponized aircraft, vessels, or vehicles of any kind. • Battering rams, slugs, and breaching apparatuses that are explosive in nature. This does not include a handheld, one-person ram.
• Firearms and ammunition of.50 caliber or greater, excluding standard-issue shotguns and standard-issue shotgun ammunition.
• Specialized firearms and ammunition of less than.50 caliber, including firearms and accessories identified as assault weapons in Penal Code § 30510 and Penal Code § 30515, with the exception of standard-issue service weapons. • Any firearm or firearm accessory that is designed to launch explosive projectiles. • Noise-flash diversionary devices and explosive breaching tools. • Munitions containing tear gas or OC, excluding standard, service-issued handheld pepper spray.
• TASER® Shockwave, microwave weapons, water cannons, and long-range acoustic devices (LRADs).
• Kinetic energy weapons and munitions.

Hanford Police Department
Hanford PD Policy

MILITARY EQUIPMENT
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2023/05/22, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Hanford Police Department ***DRAFT*** MILITARY EQUIPMENT - 2 • Any other equipment as determined by a governing body or a state agency to require additional oversight.
705.2 POLICY
It is the policy of the Hanford Police Department that members of this department comply with the provisions of Government Code § 7071 with respect to military equipment. This is to be accomplished by:
(a) An annual report documenting each use of military equipment throughout the year to the Hanford City Council.
(b) A complaint procedure, for citizens to report possible misuse of military equipment by police personnel. This complaint procedure is outlined in the Hanford Police Department General Orders Manual 1020 Personnel Complaints. These complaints related to military equipment and the outcome of each complaint shall be reported to the Hanford City Council on an annual basis.
705.3 MILITARY EQUIPMENT COORDINATOR
The Chief of Police should designate a member of this department to act as the military equipment coordinator. The responsibilities of the military equipment coordinator include but are not limited to:
(a) Acting as liaison to the governing body for matters related to the requirements of this policy.
(b) Identifying department equipment that qualifies as military equipment in the current possession of the Department, or the equipment the Department intends to acquire that requires approval by the governing body.
(c) Conducting an inventory of all military equipment at least annually. (d) Collaborating with any allied agency that may use military equipment within the jurisdiction of the Hanford Police Department (Government Code § 7071). (e) Preparing for, scheduling, and coordinating the annual community engagement meeting to include:

I. Publicizing the details of the meeting.

II. Preparing for public questions regarding the department's funding, acquisition, and use of equipment.
(f) Preparing the annual military equipment report for submission to the Chief of Police and ensuring that the report is made available on the department website (Government Code § 7072).
(g) The complaint procedure will follow the personnel complaint procedure as outlined in Section 1020 of the Hanford Police Department Policy manual. (h) Ensure publication of the annual military equipment report submitted to and approved by the Hanford City Council.

Hanford Police Department
Hanford PD Policy

MILITARY EQUIPMENT
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2023/05/22, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Hanford Police Department ***DRAFT*** MILITARY EQUIPMENT - 3 705.4 MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE POLICY
Pursuant to California Government Code §7070, the Police Department will submit a Military Equipment Use Policy for approval to the Hanford City Council annually. 705.5 APPROVAL
The Chief of Police or the authorized designee shall obtain approval from the governing body by way of an ordinance adopting the military equipment policy. As part of the approval process, the Chief of Police or the authorized designee shall ensure the proposed military equipment policy is submitted to the governing body and is available on the department website at least 30 days prior to any public hearing concerning the military equipment at issue (Government Code § 7071). The military equipment policy must be approved by the governing body prior to engaging in any of the following (Government Code § 7071):
(a) Requesting military equipment made available pursuant to 10 USC § 2576a. (b) Seeking funds for military equipment, including but not limited to applying for a grant, soliciting or accepting private, local, state, or federal funds, in-kind donations, or other donations or transfers.
(c) Acquiring military equipment either permanently or temporarily, including by borrowing or leasing.
(d) Collaborating with another law enforcement agency in the deployment or other use of military equipment within the jurisdiction of this department. (e) Using any new or existing military equipment for a purpose, in a manner, or by a person not previously approved by the governing body.
(f) Soliciting or responding to a proposal for, or entering into an agreement with, any other person or entity to seek funds for, apply to receive, acquire, use, or collaborate in the use of military equipment.
(g) Acquiring military equipment through any means not provided above. 705.6 USE IN EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES
In exigent circumstances and with the approval of the Chief of Police or his/her designee, the Police Department may acquire, borrow and/or use Military Equipment that is not included in the Military Equipment Use Policy.

If the Police Department acquires, borrows, and/or uses Military Equipment in exigent circumstances, in accordance with this section, it must take all of the following actions:
• Provide written notice of that acquisition or use to the City Council within 30 days following the commencement of such Exigent Circumstance, unless such information is confidential or privileged under local, state or federal law. • If it is anticipated that the use will continue beyond the Exigent Circumstance, submit a proposed amended Military Equipment Use Policy to the City Council within 90 days following the borrowing, acquisition and/or use, and receive approval, as applicable, from the City Council.

Hanford Police Department
Hanford PD Policy

MILITARY EQUIPMENT
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2023/05/22, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Hanford Police Department ***DRAFT*** MILITARY EQUIPMENT - 4 • Include the Military Equipment in the Police Department's next annual Military Equipment Report.
705.7 COORDINATION WITH OTHER JURISDICTIONS
Military equipment used by any member of this jurisdiction shall be approved for use and in accordance with this department policy. Military equipment used by other jurisdictions that are providing mutual aid to this jurisdiction shall comply with their respective military equipment use policies in rendering mutual aid.
705.8 ANNUAL REPORT
Upon approval of a military equipment policy, the Chief of Police or the authorized designee should submit a military equipment report to the governing body for each type of military equipment approved within one year of approval, and annually thereafter for as long as the military equipment is available for use (Government Code § 7072).

The Chief of Police or the authorized designee should also make each annual military equipment report publicly available on the department website for as long as the military equipment is available for use. The report shall include all information required by Government Code § 7072 for the preceding calendar year for each type of military equipment in department inventory. 705.9 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
Within 30 days of submitting and publicly releasing the annual report, the Department shall hold at least one well-publicized and conveniently located community engagement meeting, at which the Department should discuss the report and respond to public questions regarding the funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment.
705.10 MILITARY USE EQUIPMENT
A. Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS)
(a) Description, quantity, life span, capabilities and purchase cost.

I. DJI Mavic Air, cost:444.00, Quantity 1, 30-minute flight time, record video/ audio
II. DJI Matrice, cost: 5000.00, Quantity 1, 55-minute flight time., record video (b) Purpose
To be deployed when its view would assist officers or incident commanders with the following situations, which include but are not limited to.

I. Major crime investigations
II. Search for missing persons
III. Natural disaster management
IV. Crime scene photography

Hanford Police Department
Hanford PD Policy

MILITARY EQUIPMENT
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2023/05/22, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Hanford Police Department ***DRAFT*** MILITARY EQUIPMENT - 5 V. SWAT, tactical or other public safety and life preservation missions VI. In response to specific requests from local, state and federal authorities for fire response and/or prevention
VII. At the request of another city department to assist with a legitimate City aerial photography needs.

VIII. Search and/or rescue operations.

IX. Public presentations with department approval
c. Authorized use
Only assigned operators who have completed and receive regular quarterly training on its use and possess a certification of waiver and authorization through the FFA (d) Expected Life Span
All UAS equipment has an expected lifespan of 5-7 years. (e) Legal and Procedural Rules
Use is established under FAA regulation 14 CFR Part 107 and the Hanford Police Department UAS Policy. It is our policy that UAS equipment is to be used for official purposes and in a manner that respects the privacy of our community, pursuant to State and Federal law.

B. Robots: A remotely -controlled unmanned machine that operates on the ground, which is utilized to enhance the safety of the community and officers (a) Description, quantity, life span, capabilities and purchase cost I. Recon Scout, cost: $3000.00, Quantity 1, 30-yard range, hand-held throwable, relays video/audio
(b) Purpose
To be used to gain visual and audio data.

I. Major crime investigations
II. Search for persons
III. Natural disaster management
IV. SWAT, tactical or other public safety and life preservation missions V. In response to specific requests from local, state and federal authorities VI. Search and/or rescue operations.

VII. Public presentations with department approval.
c. Authorized use
Only assigned operators who have received training on its use and policy. (d) Expected Life Span

Hanford Police Department
Hanford PD Policy

MILITARY EQUIPMENT
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2023/05/22, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Hanford Police Department ***DRAFT*** MILITARY EQUIPMENT - 6 All robot's equipment have an expected lifespan of 10 years or until no longer usable (e) Legal and Procedural Rules
It is our policy that all robot equipment is to be used for official purposes and in a manner that respects the privacy of our community, pursuant to State and Federal law.

C. Armored Vehicles: Commercially produced wheeled armored personnel vehicle utilized for law enforcement purposes
(a) Description, quantity, life span, capabilities, and purchase cost I. MRAP (Mine Resistant Ambush Protected) Manufactured by Navistar for the U.S.

Military. Acquired for free through the DRMO process. Estimated value of $900,000.00., Quantity 1, Seats 16 personnel with an open floor plan. It is capable of stopping a wide variety of projectiles beyond what a vest or shield is capable of.

II. ARV (Armored Response Vehicle) manufactured by Supreme Corporation. Quantity 1, Cost $400,000.00, Seats 10 with an open floor plan. It is capable of stopping a wide variety of projectiles beyond what a vest or shield is capable of. (b) Purpose
To be used to respond to critical incidents and to enhance officer and community safety. To improve scene containment and stabilization, and assist in resolving critical incidents. The types of incidents these vehicles respond to are:

I. High Risk Search Warrants involving SWAT operations.

II. High Risk Search for persons
III. Natural disaster management
IV. SWAT, tactical or other public safety and life preservation missions V. In response to specific requests from local, state and federal authorities VI. Search and/or rescue operations.

VII. Approved equipment request from an outside jurisdiction related to high-risk operations
VIII. Public relations events such as national night out and other community events for people to see and understand it's use.
c. Authorized Use
The use of the armored vehicles is only authorized by the Chief of Police or SWAT commander, based on the specific circumstances of a given critical incident. Armored vehicles shall only be used for deployment by officers trained in their use by the department.
(d) Expected Lifespan
Armored vehicles have a 25-year lifespan.
(e) Fiscal Impact

Hanford Police Department
Hanford PD Policy

MILITARY EQUIPMENT
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2023/05/22, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Hanford Police Department ***DRAFT*** MILITARY EQUIPMENT - 7 Annual Maintenance costs:

I. MRAP - $5000.00
II. ARV - $15,000
(f) Training
All Drivers/Operators shall attend formalized department or other approved training in the vehicle's operation, capabilities and practical driving instruction. (g) Legal and Procedural Rules
It is our policy that all Armored Vehicles are to be used for official purposes pursuant to State and Federal law.

D. 40MM Launchers and rounds used to launch impact and gas rounds. (a) Description, quantity, life span, capabilities and purchase cost I. Defense Technologies, 40MM single shot launcher, cost $1000.00, Quantity 4. The 40MM Tactical launcher is a single shot launcher and features an expandable stock and a front grip it will fire standard 40MM rounds up to 4.8 inches in length up to 131 feet. The tactical launcher is only authorized to be used by swat personnel on approved missions and training.

II. 40MM Ferret CS or gas rounds: A less lethal rounds used to penetrate barriers such as windows, hollow core doors, wallboard, and thin plywood. Cost: $30.00, quantity 105. Upon impact the nose cone delivers a small chemical payload into a structure or vehicle. The working range is 5 feet to 120 feet from the target.

III. Spede heat CS or gas canister. Cost: $30.00, quantity 5 used in crowd control situations to with a high-volume burn that expels its gas or smoke in 20-40 seconds used to disperse large crowds, conceal tactical movements or to route a crowd.

IV. Defense technologyFlameless tri chamber gas canisters. Cost: $30.00, quantity 21.

A less lethal munition dispensed into a vehicle or residence. Due to flameless technology, it is not prone to igniting other nearby objects and starting a fire. (b) Purpose
To limit the escalation of conflict where employment of lethal force is prohibited or to attempt to prevent the escalation of a situation to the point of using lethal force. (c) Authorized Use
Situations for use of the less lethal weapons system may include, but are not limited to:

I. High Risk Search Warrants involving SWAT operations.

II. High Risk Search for persons
III. In response to specific requests from local, state, and federal authorities IV. Approved equipment request from an outside jurisdiction related to high-risk operations

Hanford Police Department
Hanford PD Policy

MILITARY EQUIPMENT
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2023/05/22, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Hanford Police Department ***DRAFT*** MILITARY EQUIPMENT - 8 V. Self-destructive, dangerous and/or combative individuals VI. Riot/Crowd control and civil unrest incidents.

VII. To obtain a tactical advantage.

VIII. Potentially vicious animals.

IX. Training exercises or approved demonstrations.
d. Expected Lifespan
40MM rounds have a 5-year life span.
(e) Fiscal Impact
Annual Maintenance costs of $1500.00, 50 rounds purchased annually. (f) Training
Sworn members utilizing 40MM less lethal chemical agents or impact rounds are trained in their use by department less lethal and chemical agents instructors. All chemical agent deployments are to be reviewed by Chemical agent instructors who have been to a 40 Hour Peace Officer Standards and Training course on chemical agent use and deployment.
(g) Legal and Procedural Rules
It is our policy that all 40MM chemical, impact and gas rounds are for official law enforcement purposes and are used consistent with department orders and state/federal law, including those regarding the use of force.

E. Less Lethal Shotgun: Used to deploy the less lethal 12-gauge Super-Sock Beanbag Round and Royal Arms, 420 grain Copper Frangible Barricade Breaching Rounds. (a) Description, quantity, capabilities, and purchase cost I. Remington 870 Less lethal Shotgun, Cost $1000.00 Quantity 8. The Remington 870 is used to deploy Super Sock Beanbag rounds up to an effective distance of 75 feet.

The range of the weapon system helps to maintain space between the officers and a suspect reducing the immediacy of the threat and possibly preventing the deployment of lethal force options.

II. Remington 12gauge stockless shotgun for barricade breaching rounds, Cost 800.00, Qty 2. This weapon system is only utilized by the SWAT Team on approved missions and in training. It is a faster and effective means of defeating fortified locations.

III. 12-gauge super-sock beanbag round. Cost $5.00, Qty 2000 rounds. A less lethal; 2.4- inch 12-gauge shotgun round firing a ballistic fiber bag filled with 40 grams of shot.

Fired at a speed of 270-290 feet per second it has an effective range of between 5-75 feet. Effective range is dependent upon a variety of variables such as distance, clothing, stature, and point of impact. All less lethal shotguns firing this munition are distinguished by orange slings and orange stocks which are indicative of a less lethal weapon. All less lethal identified shotguns are never to fire live rounds other than the super sock or other approved less lethal round for any reason.

Hanford Police Department
Hanford PD Policy

MILITARY EQUIPMENT
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2023/05/22, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Hanford Police Department ***DRAFT*** MILITARY EQUIPMENT - 9 (b) Purpose
To limit the escalation of a conflict where employment of lethal force is prohibited or undesirable. Breaching ammunition may be used to breach entry obstacles. (c) Authorized use
Only assigned operators who have received training on its use and policy. (d) Expected Life Span
No expiration on lifespan.
(e) Fiscal Impact
I. Annual Cost of $200.00 for breaching ammunition.

II. Annual cost of $2000.00 for less lethal shotgun rounds. (f) Training
I. Breaching instructors must complete an approved training course for this specialized tool. They must also train at least twice a year on its operations.

This tool is only used on approved SWAT operations.

II. The less lethal shotguns shall only be used by sworn personnel who have received annual training from the department. The training is conducted annually and shall review policy and contain a course of live fire. (g) Legal and Procedural Rules
It is our policy that all less lethal and breaching shotguns are to be used for official law enforcement purposes and pursuant to State and Federal law, including those regarding the use of force.

F. Distraction Devices: A device used to distract dangerous persons. (a) Description, quantity, life span, capabilities, and purchase cost I. Combined tactical systems, 7290 FLASHBANG, Cost $50.00, Quantity 55. The 7290 Flash-Bang emits an output of 175db and produces 6-8 million candelas of light. (b) Purpose
A distraction device is ideal for distracting dangerous suspects during assaults, hostage rescue, room entry or other high risk arrest situations. To produce an atmospheric overpressure and brilliant white light and as a result, can cause short term (6-8 Seconds) physiological/psychological sensory deprivation to give officer a tactical advantage. (c) Authorized Use
Situations for use of the less lethal weapons system may include, but are not limited to:

I. By officers who have been trained in their proper use.

II. High Risk Search Warrants involving SWAT operations.

III. In hostage and barricaded subject situations.

Hanford Police Department
Hanford PD Policy

MILITARY EQUIPMENT
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2023/05/22, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Hanford Police Department ***DRAFT*** MILITARY EQUIPMENT - 10 IV. To obtain a tactical advantage in a high-risk situation where there may be extreme hazards to the officers.

V. During training exercises.
d. Expected Lifespan
Until used.
(e) Fiscal Impact
Annual Maintenance costs of $1500.00, 30 rounds purchased annually. (f) Training
Prior to use officers must attend diversionary training conducted by POST certified instructors.
(g) Legal and Procedural Rules
It is our policy that all distraction devices are for official law enforcement purposes and are used consistent with department orders and state/federal law, including those regarding the use of force.

G. Mobile Incident Command Vehicle (MIC):
a. Description, quantity, life span, capabilities, and purchase cost I. Freightliner Chassis (Custom Built) vehicle, cost $450,000.00. Quantity 1, The MIC is used for SWAT/CNT and other critical incidents, preplanned large events, natural disasters, and Community events.
b. Purpose
To be used as the incident command vehicle in specific circumstances of a given critical incident, large event, natural disaster, or community event that is taking place. c. Authorized Use
Only officers trained in the deployment and operation of the MIC consistent with department policy. Situations in which the MIC is authorized for use would include but not be limited to critical incidents, emergencies, natural disasters, and community events.
d. Expected Lifespan
Vehicle has an expected 25-year lifespan with upgrades needed to equipment every 10 years to maintain IT equipment.
e. Fiscal Impact
Annual Maintenance costs of $5000.00.
f. Training

Hanford Police Department
Hanford PD Policy

MILITARY EQUIPMENT
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2023/05/22, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Hanford Police Department ***DRAFT*** MILITARY EQUIPMENT - 11 The driver/operator shall receive training from a current driver/operator on its safe use and deployment. The driver/operator shall maintain a driver's license endorsement consistent with the use of this vehicle.
g. Legal and Procedural Rules
It is our policy that the MIC is for official law enforcement purposes and is to be used consistent with department orders and state law regarding the operation of vehicle H. Rifles: Guns that are fired from shoulder level, having a long spirally grooved barrel intended to make bullets spin and thereby having a greater accuracy over a long distance. (a) Description, quantity, capabilities, and purchase cost I. AR-15's of various makes, Cost $1200.00 Quantity 63. The range of the weapon system helps to maintain space between the officers and a suspect reducing the immediacy of the threat and possibly preventing the deployment of lethal force options.

II. Sig Sauer SIG716 DMR AR-10.308 Caliber, Cost $1600.00, Qty 4. This weapon system is only utilized by the SWAT/ Sniper Team on approved missions and in training. This rifle is primarily used in an overwatch capacity to protect the community and SWAT Team during large events and other approved SWAT missions.

III. Speer Gold Dot.223 caliber 62 grain rifle round. Quantity 74 cases 500 rounds per case at a cost of $285.00 per case. Remington ammunition made by Speer.

Features nickel plated brass cases that are reloadable and do not corrode. Gold DOT ammunition is widely used by law enforcement as it is a quality round with excellent ballistics. The brand of round may differ as we have experienced shortages and delays in acquiring our necessary ammunition. Any replacement ammunition will be of similar quality.

IV. Federal.223 Caliber 55 grain rifle round. Quantity 74 cases of 500 rounds per case at a cost of $179.00 per case. This is high quality full metal jacket round produced by Winchester. This round is safe to fire through our Rifles but is only used at the range in practice situation. This round is used in place of the Speer round as a cost saving measure as they are over $100 cheaper per case. The brand of round may differ as we have experienced shortages and delays in acquiring our necessary ammunition.

Any replacement ammunition will be of similar quality.

V. Federal Tru.308 168grain Tactical Tip MatchKing. Quantity 7 cases of 500 rounds at a cost of $434.00 per case. This round is used exclusively in the AR-10 Weapon system utilized by the SWAT/Sniper Team. This round was specifically made for law enforcement and AR-10 weapons systems. It is a flat trajectory bullet with uniform loads to ensure repeatable accuracy. The brand of round may differ as we have experienced shortages and delays in acquiring our necessary ammunition. Any replacement ammunition will be of similar quality.
b. Purpose
To be used as a precision weapon to address a threat with more precision and/or distances than a handgun.

Hanford Police Department
Hanford PD Policy

MILITARY EQUIPMENT
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2023/05/22, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Hanford Police Department ***DRAFT*** MILITARY EQUIPMENT - 12 c. Authorized use
Only members that are POST certified and department trained are authorized to use a rifle.
d. Expected Life Span
Until used..
(e) Fiscal Impact
(f) Annual Cost of approximately $23,985.00 for ammunition. Price may vary depending upon the availability of ammunition and brands.
(g) Training
(h) Prior to use of the rifle, officers must be trained by a POST certified instructor in the operation of the rifle. Additionally, all members of the department will qualify with the rifle two times per year.
(i) The.308 rifles may only be used on SWAT missions by a SWAT member who has been to the Swat/Sniper POST certified school.
(j) Legal and Procedural Rules
Use is established by Hanford Police Department General Orders 300, Use of Force.

It is the policy of the Hanford Police Department to utilize rifles only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law regarding the use of force. They may also be used for department approved public presentations. 705.11 MAINTENANCE OF MILITARY EQUIPMENT SUPPLY LEVELS When stocks of perishable items have reached a level where they are nearing exhaustion based upon current supplies and projected needs. In order to maintain essential availability for Department needs the Hanford Police Department is authorized to acquire additional stock items listed here, consistent with the City of Hanford's purchasing policing. 705.12 ALTERNATIVE EQUIPMENT
A. The Hanford Police department will review its listed military equipment annually to determine the following:
(a) If the equipment is still needed for its intended purpose (b) If there are other alternatives to the military equipment listed.

B. The Hanford Police Department will present this information to council annually at the same time this policy is updated.
705.13 SECTION TITLE

Group Name Name Title Location Presenter Record Type Total Hours SWAT Cano, Ruben SWAT Diversionary devises Lemoore Sportsman's Department Training Training 1 SWAT Cano, Ruben SWAT Firearms Training and Qualification Lemoore Sportsman's club Department Training Firearms Qualifications 4 SWAT Cano, Ruben SWAT Firearms Training and Qualification Lemoore Sportsman's club Department Training Firearms Qualifications 5 SWAT Cano, Ruben SWAT CS gas training Kings County Fire Station #4 Department Training Training 5 SWAT Cano, Ruben SWAT Firearms Training and Qualification Lemoore Sportsman's club Department Training Firearms Qualifications 5 SWAT Cano, Ruben SWAT Firearms Training and Qualification Lemoore Sportsman's club Department Training Firearms Qualifications 5 SWAT Cano, Ruben SWAT Firearms Training and Qualification Lemoore Sportsman's club Department Training Firearms Qualifications 6 31 SWAT Fogal, Jacob SWAT Diversionary devises Lemoore Sportsman's Department Training Training 1 SWAT Fogal, Jacob SWAT Firearms Training and Qualification Lemoore Sportsman's club Department Training Firearms Qualifications 4 SWAT Fogal, Jacob SIMS Training, Active shooter Frontier Elementary School, Classrooms, Office, and Library Department Training Training 4 SWAT Fogal, Jacob SWAT Firearms Training and Qualification Lemoore Sportsman's club Department Training Firearms Qualifications 4 SWAT Fogal, Jacob SWAT Firearms Training and Qualification Lemoore Sportsman's club Department Training Firearms Qualifications 5 SWAT Fogal, Jacob SWAT CS gas training Kings County Fire Station #4 Department Training Training 5 SWAT Fogal, Jacob SWAT Firearms Training and Qualification Lemoore Sportsman's club Department Training Firearms Qualifications 5 SWAT Fogal, Jacob SWAT Firearms Training and Qualification Lemoore Sportsman's club Department Training Firearms Qualifications 5 SWAT Fogal, Jacob SWAT Firearms Training and Qualification Lemoore Sportsman's club Department Training Firearms Qualifications 6 39 SWAT Orosco, Jorge SWAT Diversionary devises Lemoore Sportsman's Department Training Training 1 SWAT Orosco, Jorge SWAT Firearms Training and Qualification Lemoore Sportsman's club Department Training Firearms Qualifications 4 SWAT Orosco, Jorge SIMS Training, Active shooter Frontier Elementary School, Classrooms, Office, and Library Department Training Training 4 SWAT Orosco, Jorge SWAT Firearms Training and Qualification Lemoore Sportsman's club Department Training Firearms Qualifications 4 SWAT Orosco, Jorge SWAT Firearms Training and Qualification Lemoore Sportsman's club Department Training Firearms Qualifications 5 SWAT Orosco, Jorge SWAT CS gas training Kings County Fire Station #4 Department Training Training 5 SWAT Orosco, Jorge SWAT Firearms Training and Qualification Lemoore Sportsman's club Department Training Firearms Qualifications 5 SWAT Orosco, Jorge SWAT Firearms Training and Qualification Lemoore Sportsman's club Department Training Firearms Qualifications 5 SWAT Orosco, Jorge SWAT Firearms Training and Qualification Lemoore Sportsman's club Department Training Firearms Qualifications 6 39 SWAT Avalos, Fabian SWAT Diversionary devises Lemoore Sportsman's Department Training Training 1 SWAT Avalos, Fabian SWAT Firearms Training and Qualification Lemoore Sportsman's club Department Training Firearms Qualifications 4

SWAT Avalos, Fabian SIMS Training, Active shooter Frontier Elementary School, Classrooms, Office, and Library Department Training Training 4 SWAT Avalos, Fabian SWAT Firearms Training and Qualification Lemoore Sportsman's club Department Training Firearms Qualifications 4 SWAT Avalos, Fabian SWAT Firearms Training and Qualification Lemoore Sportsman's club Department Training Firearms Qualifications 5 SWAT Avalos, Fabian SWAT CS gas training Kings County Fire Station #4 Department Training Training 5 SWAT Avalos, Fabian SWAT Firearms Training and Qualification Lemoore Sportsman's club Department Training Firearms Qualifications 5 SWAT Avalos, Fabian SWAT Firearms Training and Qualification Lemoore Sportsman's club Department Training Firearms Qualifications 5 33 SWAT Wyand, Chandler SWAT Diversionary devises Lemoore Sportsman's Department Training Training 1 SWAT Wyand, Chandler SWAT Firearms Training and Qualification Lemoore Sportsman's club Department Training Firearms Qualifications 4 SWAT Wyand, Chandler Department Firearms Training and Qualification Lemoore Sportsman's Club Department Training Firearms Qualifications 4 SWAT Wyand, Chandler SIMS Training, Active shooter Frontier Elementary School, Classrooms, Office, and Library Department Training Training 4 SWAT Wyand, Chandler SWAT Firearms Training and Qualification Lemoore Sportsman's club Department Training Firearms Qualifications 4 SWAT Wyand, Chandler SWAT Firearms Training and Qualification Lemoore Sportsman's club Department Training Firearms Qualifications 5 SWAT Wyand, Chandler SWAT CS gas training Kings County Fire Station #4 Department Training Training 5 SWAT Wyand, Chandler SWAT Firearms Training and Qualification Lemoore Sportsman's club Department Training Firearms Qualifications 5 SWAT Wyand, Chandler SWAT Firearms Training and Qualification Lemoore Sportsman's club Department Training Firearms Qualifications 5 SWAT Wyand, Chandler SWAT Firearms Training and Qualification Lemoore Sportsman's club Department Training Firearms Qualifications 6 SWAT Wyand, Chandler SPECIAL WEAPONS & TACTICS DUBLIN ALAMEDA COUNTY CA POST Certified Training Records 80 123
SWAT Jaime, Rolando SWAT Diversionary devises Lemoore Sportsman's Department Training Training 1 SWAT Jaime, Rolando SWAT Firearms Training and Qualification Lemoore Sportsman's club Department Training Firearms Qualifications 4 SWAT Jaime, Rolando SWAT Firearms Training and Qualification Lemoore Sportsman's club Department Training Firearms Qualifications 4 SWAT Jaime, Rolando Department Firearms Training and Qualification Lemoore Sportsman's Department Training Firearms Qualifications 4 SWAT Jaime, Rolando SWAT Firearms Training and Qualification Lemoore Sportsman's club Department Training Firearms Qualifications 5 SWAT Jaime, Rolando SWAT CS gas training Kings County Fire Station #4 Department Training Training 5 SWAT Jaime, Rolando SWAT Firearms Training and Qualification Lemoore Sportsman's club Department Training Firearms Qualifications 5 SWAT Jaime, Rolando SWAT Firearms Training and Qualification Lemoore Sportsman's club Department Training Firearms Qualifications 5 SWAT Jaime, Rolando SWAT Firearms Training and Qualification Lemoore Sportsman's club Department Training Firearms Qualifications 6 39 SWAT Allen, Chad SWAT Diversionary devises Lemoore Sportsman's Department Training Training 1 SWAT Allen, Chad SWAT Firearms Training and Qualification Lemoore Sportsman's club Department Training Firearms Qualifications 4

SWAT Allen, Chad SWAT Firearms Training and Qualification Lemoore Sportsman's club Department Training Firearms Qualifications 4 SWAT Allen, Chad SWAT Firearms Training and Qualification Lemoore Sportsman's club Department Training Firearms Qualifications 5 SWAT Allen, Chad SWAT CS gas training Kings County Fire Station #4 Department Training Training 5 SWAT Allen, Chad SWAT Firearms Training and Qualification Lemoore Sportsman's club Department Training Firearms Qualifications 5 SWAT Allen, Chad SWAT Firearms Training and Qualification Lemoore Sportsman's club Department Training Firearms Qualifications 5 SWAT Allen, Chad SWAT Firearms Training and Qualification Lemoore Sportsman's club Department Training Firearms Qualifications 6 SWAT Allen, Chad SWAT Firearms Training and Qualification Lemoore Sportsman's club Department Training Firearms Qualifications 6 SWAT Allen, Chad SWAT Firearms Training and Qualification Lemoore Sportsman's club Department Training Firearms Qualifications 6 47 SWAT Edlund, James SWAT Firearms Training and Qualification Lemoore Sportsman's club Department Training Firearms Qualifications 4 SWAT Edlund, James SWAT Firearms Training and Qualification Lemoore Sportsman's club Department Training Firearms Qualifications 5 9 SWAT Gustin, Jason SWAT Diversionary devises Lemoore Sportsman's Department Training Training 1 SWAT Gustin, Jason SWAT Firearms Training and Qualification Lemoore Sportsman's club Department Training Firearms Qualifications 4 SWAT Gustin, Jason SWAT Firearms Training and Qualification Lemoore Sportsman's club Department Training Firearms Qualifications 4 SWAT Gustin, Jason SWAT Firearms Training and Qualification Lemoore Sportsman's club Department Training Firearms Qualifications 5 SWAT Gustin, Jason SWAT CS gas training Kings County Fire Station #4 Department Training Training 5 SWAT Gustin, Jason SWAT Firearms Training and Qualification Lemoore Sportsman's club Department Training Firearms Qualifications 5 SWAT Gustin, Jason SWAT Firearms Training and Qualification Lemoore Sportsman's club Department Training Firearms Qualifications 5 SWAT Gustin, Jason SWAT Firearms Training and Qualification Lemoore Sportsman's club Department Training Firearms Qualifications 6 SWAT Gustin, Jason CRITICAL INCID RESP/SUP/MGR P.O. BOX 1700 ESCONDIDOCALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF TACTICAL OFFICERSCA POST Certified Training Records 16 51

Total Minutes Cost
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0

0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 $3,943.85
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0

0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 $359.00

Group Name Employee Id Name Title Location
SNIPER 14103 Crain, Sean-Paul RIFLE MARKSMANSHIP AND SNIPER2326 FRESNO STREET FRESNO SNIPER 1482 Sitter, Steven FIREARMS-NIGHT VISION PRECISION RIFLE DEPLOYMENTSPO BOX 1266 FRESNO

Presenter Record Type Total Hours Cost
FRESNO POLICE DEPARTMENTCA POST Certified Training Records40 $1,207 ADVANCED COMBAT EVOLUTIONSCA POST Certified Training Records16 $717

Group Name Name Title Location
CNT Tomey, Ryan TRAINING CONFERENCE 8250 CALVINE ROAD #C326 SACRAMENTO CNT Estrada, Nathaniel TRAINING CONFERENCE 1825 BELL STREET SACRAMENTO CNT Estrada, Nathaniel NEGOTIATIONS FOR DOMEST.VIOL. 6155 CORNERSTONE CT #130 SAN DIEGO CNT Rivera, Jonathan PEER COUNSELING, ADVANCED 1881 BUSINESS CTR. DR., STE 11 SAN BERNARDINO CNT Rivera, Jonathan NEGOTIATIONS FOR DOMEST.VIOL. 6155 CORNERSTONE CT #130 SAN DIEGO CNT Pacheco, Rosemary NEGOTIATIONS FOR DOMEST.VIOL. 6155 CORNERSTONE CT #130 SAN DIEGO CNT Pacheco, Rosemary HOSTAGE NEGOTIATIONS 705 E.BIDWELL, STE 2-357 FOLSOM CNT Ragsdale, Joshua NEGOTIATIONS FOR DOMEST.VIOL. 6155 CORNERSTONE CT #130 SAN DIEGO

Presenter CCN Record Type Total Hours Cost
CALIFORNIA POLICE ACTIVITIES LEAGUE1406 - 28000 - 2022 - 1CA POST Certified Training Records7 $165 7 WESTERN STATES INFORMATION NETWORK1342 - 28000 - 2021 - 2CA POST Certified Training Records24 $1,409 GOVERNMENT TRAINING AGENCY9070 - 32349 - 2022 - 1CA POST Certified Training Records24 $1,145 48 COUNSELING TEAM INTERNATIONAL, THE7180 - 22661 - 2022 - 1CA POST Certified Training Records16 $1,800 GOVERNMENT TRAINING AGENCY9070 - 32349 - 2022 - 1CA POST Certified Training Records24 $1,145 40 GOVERNMENT TRAINING AGENCY9070 - 32349 - 2022 - 1CA POST Certified Training Records24 $1,145 D-PREP 7290 - 21500 - 2021 - 4CA POST Certified Training Records40 $2,165 64 GOVERNMENT TRAINING AGENCY9070 - 32349 - 2022 - 1CA POST Certified Training Records24 $1,145 24

1 HANFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT ANNUAL REPORT ON CONTROLLED EQUIPMENT USE - 2022

ANNUAL MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE REPORT
Table of Contents
Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... 2 Controlled Equipment Categories ................................................................................................... 3 Robot ......................................................................................................................................................... 4 Unmanned Aerial Vehicles ........................................................................................................................ 5 Armored Personnel Carrier, .............................................................................................................6-7 Command and Control Vehicles .................................................................................................................8 Specialized Firearms .................................................................................................................................. 9 Noise Flash Diversionary Devices ............................................................................................................. 10 Tear Gas ...................................................................................................................................................11 Projectile Launch Platforms and Associated Munitions ......................................................................... 12

2 HANFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT ANNUAL REPORT ON CONTROLLED EQUIPMENT USE - 2022 Executive Summary
On September 30, 2021, California Governor Gavin Newsom approved Assembly Bill 481 requiring California law enforcement agencies to obtain approval of a Military Equipment Use Policy by their applicable governing body (City Council) prior to taking certain actions related to the funding, acquisition, or use of controlled equipment.

Assembly Bill 481 allows the governing body to approve the funding, acquisition, and use of controlled equipment (“Military Equipment”) within its jurisdiction if the equipment meets specified standards.

The Controlled Equipment Use Policy and an Annual Controlled Equipment Use Report is subject to annual review to affirm the criteria outlined in Assembly Bill 481 have been met.

The format of this report was crafted in a manner that conforms to the statutorily required annual report pursuant to California Government Code section 7072(a) to include the following information:

1.) A summary of the military equipment uses and the purpose;

2.) A summary of any complaints or concerns concerning the military equipment;

3.) The results of any internal audits, information on any violations, and actions taken in response;

4.) The total annual cost for each type of equipment;

5.) The quantity possessed of each type of equipment;

6.) The intent to acquire additional equipment and quantity sought. ***Unless otherwise noted the funds for the equipment, staff costs, training costs, or costs for the use of the equipment, is from the approved existing budget. All funds designated in the 2023 calendar year will come from the City of Hanford general fund. Tuition cost for outside training courses, even if included in the existing budget, will be noted in the total annual outside training cost section.

The Hanford Police Department recognizes the public’s ongoing interest in how controlled equipment is used to protect our community and is committed to maintaining our community’s trust in providing professional and responsive police services. As such, the Hanford Police Department has authored the following comprehensive Annual Controlled Equipment Use Report to remain transparent with our community and in accordance with annual reporting requirements set forth by applicable California Law.

3 HANFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT ANNUAL REPORT ON CONTROLLED EQUIPMENT USE - 2022 Controlled Equipment Categories
Assembly Bill 481 created Government Code 7070 which designated 15 categories of items deemed "military" or more accurately defined as controlled equipment:

Category 1: Unmanned, remotely piloted, powered aerial or ground vehicles Category 2: Mine-resistant ambush-protected vehicles or armored personnel carriers Category 3: High mobility multipurpose wheeled vehicles (HMMWV), two-and- one-half-ton trucks, five-ton trucks, or wheeled vehicles that have a breaching or entry apparatus attached
Category 4: Tracked armored vehicles that provide ballistic protection to their occupants Category 5: Command and control vehicles that are either built or modified to facilitate the operational control and direction of public safety units Category 6: Weaponized aircraft, vessels, or vehicles of any kind Category 7: Battering rams, slugs, and breaching apparatuses that are explosive in nature Category 8: Firearms and ammunition of .50 caliber or greater, excluding standard-issue shotguns and standard-issue shotgun ammunition
Category 9: Ammunition of .50 or greater.

Category 10: Specialized firearms and ammunition of less than .50 caliber, including firearms and accessories identified as assault weapons in Penal Code § 30510 and Penal Code §30515, with the exception of standard-issue handguns Category 11: Any firearm or firearm accessory that is designed to launch explosive projectiles Category 12: Flashbang grenades and explosive breaching tools, “tear gas”, “pepperballs”, munitions containing tear gas or OC, excluding standard, service- issued handheld pepper spray
Category 13: TASER® Shockwave, microwave weapons, water cannons, and long-range acoustic devices
Category 14: Launch platforms and their associated munitions: 40mm projective launchers “beanbag”, rubber bullet, and specialty impact munition (SIM) weapons Category 15: Any other equipment as determined by a governing body or a state agency to require additional oversight

4 HANFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT ANNUAL REPORT ON CONTROLLED EQUIPMENT USE - 2022 Robot (Category 1)
a. Description, quantity, capabilities, and purchase cost:

Recon Robotics- THROWBOT 1 transportable robot
Use Reporting 2022
The robot was used during four SWAT
deployments
Summary of Complaints or Concerns 2022: No
complaints or concerns received.

Internal audits / Violations 2022:

The robot was checked monthly. No violations.

Total annual Cost 2022:

None.

Intended Acquisition in 2023:

Replace with new Throwbot 2.

5 HANFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT ANNUAL REPORT ON CONTROLLED EQUIPMENT USE - 2022 Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (Category 1)
a. Description & quantity

1. DJI MAVIC AIR
Quantity: 1.

2. DJI MAVIC Matrice
Quantity: 1
Use Reporting 2022
Collectively the drones were used 9 times, with a total of 4 hours of flight time. The drones were used to search for suspects, missing persons, for a complex traffic accident scene and high-risk search warrants. The drone operators additionally participated in monthly training to maintain proficiency which is tracked but not part of the 9 instances of use.

Summary of Complaints or Concerns 2022:

No complaints or concerns received.

Internal audits / Violations 2022:

Drones were audited monthly. No violations.

Total annual Cost 2022:
$1,000 - Maintenance, software, registration, repair, battery replacement, and training.

6 HANFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT ANNUAL REPORT ON CONTROLLED EQUIPMENT USE - 2022 Armored Personnel Carrier
(Category 2 & 3)
a. Description & quantity
Supreme Corporation Armored Rescue Vehicle (ARV)
Quantity: 1
Use Reporting 2022
It was utilized at all but 1 SWAT deployment, which was 7 times throughout the year. The ARV was at the National Night Out and several community events (9) for PR purposes. The vehicle has also been used during SWAT trainings.

Summary of Complaints or Co ncern s 2022:

No complaints or concerns received.

Internal audits / Violations 2022:

No violations
Total annual Cost 2022:
$1,540 is the estimated annual maintenance.

7 HANFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT ANNUAL REPORT ON CONTROLLED EQUIPMENT USE - 2022 Armored Personnel Carrier
(Category 2 & 3)
a. Description & quantity
MRAP (Mine Resistant Ambush Protected) Manufactured by Navistar Quantity 1
Use Reporting 2022
The MRAP was utilized at all but 6 SWAT deployment during the year. The MRAP was at the several community events (3) during the for PR purposes. The vehicle has also been used during SWAT trainings.

Summary of Complaints or Concerns 2022:

No complaints or concerns received.

Internal audits / Violations 2022:

No violations
Total annual Cost 2022:

Annual maintenance cost of $5,000.00.

One time purchase of outdoor shade structure of $15,400.00 (paid for by asset forfeiture) This vehicle was acquired for free through the DRMO process. Its has an estimated value of $900,000.00.

8 HANFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT ANNUAL REPORT ON CONTROLLED EQUIPMENT USE - 2022 Command and Control Vehicles
(Category 5)
a. Description & quantity
Mobile Incident Command Vehicle (MIC)
Quantity 1
Use Reporting 2022
The MIC was utilized on 3 SWAT deployments during the year. Additionally, it was used during CNT and SWAT training and was used during 4 community events for PR purposes.

Summary of Complaints or Concerns 2022:

No complaints or concerns received.

Internal audits / Violations 2022:

No violations, monthly inspections completed with no violations Total annual Cost 2022:

Annual maintenance cost of $5,000.00.

9 HANFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT ANNUAL REPORT ON CONTROLLED EQUIPMENT USE - 2022 Specialized Firearms and Ammunition (Category 10)
a. Description & quantity

1. COLT AR-15
Quantity: 63

2. Sig Sauer SIG716 DMR AR-10.308 Caliber
Quantity: 4
Use Reporting 2022
The rifles were used during monthly range qualifications and during SWAT training. The carbines were deployed on patrol and SWAT operations per policy but were not discharged.

Summary of Complaints or Concerns 2022:

No complaints or concerns received.

Internal audits / Violations 2022:

No violations
Total annual Cost 2022:

No maintenance cost.

10 HANFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT ANNUAL REPORT ON CONTROLLED EQUIPMENT USE - 2022 Noise Flash Diversionary Devices (Category 12)
a. Description & quantity
Combined tactical systems, 7290 FLASHBANG
Quantity 55
Use Reporting 2022
NFDDs were deployed six times during SWAT operations. Three NFDDs were deployed during training and and three during demo/PR events.

Summary of Complaints or Concerns 2022:

No complaints or concerns received.

Internal audits / Violations 2022:

No violations.

Total annual Cost 2022:

No annual cost other than purchase of replacement devices after deployments.

Intended Acquisition in 2023:

Replacement of expended NFDDs.

11 HANFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT ANNUAL REPORT ON CONTROLLED EQUIPMENT USE - 2022 Tear Gas (Category 12)
Description & quantity

1. The Spede heat CS or gas canister.

Quantity 5
Defense technology Flameless Tri-Chambergas
Quantity 21
The 40MM Ferret CS or gas round
Quantity: 15
Use Reporting 2022
There was a total of two (1 ) deployments of chemical agent munitions during SWAT operations.

Summary of Complaints or Concerns 2022:

No complaints or concerns received.

Internal audits / Violations 2022:

No violations
Total annual Cost 2022:

None.

Intended Acquisition in 2023:

Replacement of expended munitions as necessary.

13 HANFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT ANNUAL REPORT ON CONTROLLED EQUIPMENT USE - 2022 Projectile Launch platforms and associated munitions (Category 14) a. Description & quantity
LMT Defense 40LMTS Launcher is a tactical 40mm single shot Quantity: 2
Defense Technologies, Single-Barrel 40mm
Quantity:4
Remington 870 Less Lethal Shotgun i
Quantity :2
Use Reporting 2022
The 40 mm launchers are used only during training. The 40 mm launchers were deployed on patrol and SWAT operations per policy but were not discharged.

Summary of Complaints or Concerns 2022:

No complaints or concerns received.

Internal audits / Violations 2022:

No violations
Total annual Cost 2022:

None
Intended Acquisition in 2023:

Replacement of expended training ammunition and upcoming training.

Total annual Cost 2022:

None
Intended Acquisition in 2023:

Replacement of expended training ammunition and upcoming training.

14.A.

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 6/6/2023 AGENDA SECTION: GENERAL BUSINESS

SUBJECT:

Approval of Sign Permit 2022-44: a request to place a mural onto the exterior wall of an existing building. The property is located at 102 S. Douty Street. (APN 012-095-006)

RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council, by motion, Adopt Resolution 23-14-R approving Sign Permit 2022-44.

BACKGROUND:

See staff report attached.

FISCAL IMPACT:

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Staff Report - Herb N Joy Mural

2. Resolution No. 23-14-R

3. Attachment 1 - Mural

4. Attachment 2 - Images

CITY OF HANFORD CITY COUNCIL

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: Tuesday, June 6, 2023

PROJECT: Sign Permit 2022-44: a request to place a mural onto the exterior wall of an existing building. The property is located at 102 S. Douty Street. (APN 012-095-006)

STAFF RECOMMENDATION

1. Staff recommends that the City Council, b y motion, adopt Resolution 23-14-R approving Sign Permit 2022-44.

RECOMMENDED MOTION

1. I move to adopt Resolution 23-14-R approving Sign Permit 2022-44.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The project is a request to place a mural onto the exterior wall of an existing building . A mural shall be defined as the following:

“Wall mural” or “mural” means an art form consisting of paint applied to a wall surface depicting a scene, personal experience or observation. A wall mural is to be public art, not for the purpose of identifying, advertising or drawing attention to a particular business, service or economic activity. For the purpose of regulation, hand painted signs on walls that contain commercial speech are considered signs and are not considered murals. Wall painting that has not been approved through a mural permit is considered graffiti.

As shown in Attachment 1, the mural is a combination of three historic photos showing various groups of bicyclists in Hanford, dubbed “Bicycle Race”. The mural consists of textured vinyl panels and was placed onto the north-facing metal cladding wall of HerbNJoy at 102 S. Douty Street prior to the approval of a sign permit or mural permit. In accordance with Hanford Municipal Code Section 17.56.230, no person shall paint a wall mural on the exterior of any structure or change any existing mural on the exterior of any structure prior to the issuance of a wall mural permit issued by the City Council.

Mural Description

The mural depicts three individual historic pictures of Hanford blended into one, displaying groups of bicyclists as they pose. Each picture is in black and white, with splashes of blue scattered throughout the mural to match the color scheme of the building façade. The phrase “Bicycle Race” is placed on the left side of the mural. The full original pictures are shown in Attachment 2.

At the suggestion of the City Attorney, wall murals shall only need to satisfy the following design criteria of Section 17.56.230(I) of the Hanford Municipal Code.

1. Have a plan for painting the mural that ensures the safety of painters and the public, and that does not impede public access. In the event that the safety plan submitted is not

being adhered to, and the City has identified a safety risk to either the arti st and/or the public, the City has the right to stop work until such time that safety issues or concerns are addressed by the artist.

ANALYSIS: The mural is existing. No other modifications are proposed. Any future use of the public right -of-way to alter t he mural will require approval of an encroachment permit by the Public Works Department.

2. To the extent feasible, the mural shall be vandal and graffiti resistant by using an approved graffiti/UV coating.

ANALYSIS: A condition of approval shall be that to the extent feasible, the mural shall be vandal and graffiti resistant by using an approved graffiti/UV coating.

All enforceable design criteria for wall murals stated in Section 17.56.230(I) are satisfied.

FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL

In accordance with Section 17.56.230 of the Hanford Municipal Code, staff recommends approval of Sign Permit 2022-44 and that the following findings are made:

1. That the proposal is consistent with the intent of development standards for wall murals.

2. That the mural preserves and enhances the visual attractiveness of the City for residents, businesses, and visitors.

3. That the mural does not identify, advertise, or draw attention to a particular business, service, or economic activity.

4. That the request will not adversely affect the public health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of Hanford.

RECOMMENDATION – CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL

The City Council shall identify conditions of approval to the issuance of a wall mural permit.

Staff recommends that the City Council approve Sign Permit No. 2022-44, subject to the following conditions:

1. That approval of this project does not exempt compliance with all applicable sections of the Zoning Ordinance, Public Works Improvement Standards, fees, or other City Ordinances.

2. That the alterations to the exterior be completed in accordance with the proposed changes, minor changes may be approved by the Community Development Director.

3. That to the extent feasible, the mural shall be vandal and graffiti resistant by using an approved graffiti/UV coating.

4. That the applicant, the owner of the structure, and the artist shall agree pursuant to language prepared by the City to indemnify, defend, and hold the City of Hanford its officials, officers, employees and agents harmless from and against any and all damages or liabilities of whatever nature arising out of or in connection with the wall mural.

Applicant:

Jeff Linder
102 S. Douty St.

Hanford, CA 93230

Property Owner:

Sarah Clark Properties LLC
800 N. Irwin St.

Hanford, CA 93230

RESOLUTION 23-14-R

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HANFORD APPROVING SIGN PERMIT NO. 2022-44, A REQUEST TO PLACE A MURAL ONTO THE EXTERIOR WALL OF AN EXISTING BUILDING. THE
PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 102 S. DOUTY STREET (APN 012-095-006).

At a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hanford duly called and held on June 6, 2023, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Civic Auditorium, it was moved by Council Member _________ ___, and seconded by Council Member ____________, and duly carried, that the following resolution be adopted:

WHEREAS, an application, filed by Main Street Hanford for Sign Permit No. 2022-44, as shown in Exhibit A, was presented to the City Council; and

WHEREAS, the proposed project is located at 102 S. Douty St. (APN 012-095-006); and

WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hanford, at a regular meeting on June 6, 2023, reviewed the request for Sign Permit No. 2022-44; and

WHEREAS, Section 15301 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines categorically exempts “Existing Facilities” from Environmental Review; and

WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hanford reviewed the application for the Sign Permit No. 20 22-44 and found that the application is consistent with Section 17. 56.230 of the Hanford Municipal Code and that the following findings are made:

1. That the proposal is consistent with the intent of development standards for wall murals.

2. That the mural preserves and enhances the visual attractiveness of the City for residents, businesses, and visitors.

3. That the mural does not identify, advertise, or draw attention to a particular business, service, or economic activity.

4. That the request will not adversely affect the public health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of Hanford.

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Hanford hereby approves Sign Permit No. 2022-44, subject to the following conditions:

1. That approval of this project does not exempt compliance with all applicable sections of the Zoning Ordinance, Public Works Improvement Standards, fees, or other City Ordinances.

2. That the alterations to the exterior be completed in accordance with the propos ed changes, minor changes may be approved by the Community Development Director.

3. That to the extent feasible, the mural shall be vandal and graffiti resistant by using an approved graffiti/UV coating.

4. That the applicant, the owner of the structure, and the artist shall agree pursuant to language prepared by the City to indemnify, defend, and hold the City of Hanford its officials, officers, employees and agents harmless from and against any and all damages or liabilities of whatever nature arising out of or in connection with the wall mural.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED , that the City Council of the City of Hanford hereby approves Sign Permit No. 20 22-44. Passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hanford duly called and held on June 6, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES: _______________________________________________________________________ NOES: _______________________________________________________________________ ABSTAIN: ____________________________________________________________________ ABSENT: _____________________________________________________________________

APPROVED: __________________________

TRAVIS PADEN
MAYOR of the City of Hanford
ATTEST:

NATALIE CORRAL

CITY CLERK

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF KINGS ) ss

CITY OF HANFORD )

I, NATALIE CORRAL, City Clerk of the City of Hanford, do hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hanford held on the 6th day of June, 2023.

Date: _____________

NATALIE CORRAL

CITY CLERK

Exhibit A
Approved Design

Council Future Agenda Items
Originated
Date Item Originator Staff Lead Date Estimate
12/20/2022 Presentation to City Council regarding
Youth Sports Activities and related
field usage and level of services
provided after the formation of the
Field Sports Advisory Committee
Council
Consensus
Brad Albert 8/1/2023
3/21/2023 Discussion regarding the feasibility of
implementing a permitting system to
allow for portable basketball hoops
within the City’s Right of Way
Council
Consensus
Various Staff 7/18/2023
5/16/2023 Review and Discussion of the Council
Handbook of Rules and Procedures
Council
Consensus
City Manager 6/20/2023
5/16/2023 Update on the City’s efforts related to
Homelessness including staff efforts to
address the concerns of businesses
and residents and efforts to locate a
low barrier shelter
Council
Consensus
City Manager 6/20/2023