Agenda — Hemet City Council, July 14, 2025 (part 3 of 6)

13.C.

Page 212 of 806 ends

Upon completion, on an Annual ongoing basis, it is estimated that the Project will generate:
1,253 Total Jobs.
▪ 806 Direct Jobs.
▪ 244 Indirect Jobs.
▪ 203 Induced Jobs
$72.55 Million in Labor Income.
▪ $50.34 Million in Direct Labor Income.
▪ $12.47 Million in Indirect Labor Income.
▪ $9.74 Million in Induced Labor Income.

We analyzed the Project using IMPLAN. IMPLAN is the most widely employed and accepted regional economic analysis software for predicting economic impacts. The IMPLAN model is used to predict the economic consequences of a development project within a local economy and measures the direct, indirect, and induced effects in terms of employment, and earnings within the local region.

A key concept to understand about the IMPLAN economic impact analysis is that one form of economic activity almost always stimulates other economic activities. The total economic impact of a specific project or event on a study area is the sum of the direct, indirect, and induced impacts. The direct economic activity stemming from the Project stimulates subsequent indirect and induced impacts to the local economy.

The three components of economic impact are further described below:

Direct Impact: Represents the initial change in the economy attributable to the development of the Project which occurs directly on the Project site.

Indirect Impact: Represents the impact on local industries as a result of inter-industry purchases as the economy responds to new demand of the directly affected industries.

This impact represents the additional rounds of economic activity that occur as a consequence from the direct impacts, specifically through the production of goods and services required to support businesses directly impacted. For example, as it relates to jobs, if a direct impact of a Project is the creation of construction jobs on-site as a result of building new homes, then an indirect impact would be the creation of jobs in the lumber industry as result of the contractor’s purchase of lumber to construct those homes.

Induced Impact: Represents the impact to the local economy as a result of the increased household spending due to additional labor income generated, specifically through the purchase of goods and/or services required to meet consumer demand generated by the Project’s residents and employees.

Page 109 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 213 of 806 ends

The specific economic impacts evaluated in this analysis are employment and labor income.

Employment: Represents the number of jobs produced in the economy.

Labor Income: Represents the total value of all forms of employment income paid throughout the local economy.

These economic impacts are driven by economic activity generated directly at the Project site as well as the related flow of economic activity in the specified region. In this case, the defined geographic region is the County of Riverside and the economic activities generating impacts are the construction of the Project, the annual ongoing activities of the new businesses located in the Project, and new local spending by the Project’s tenants. Accordingly, this analysis evaluates the direct, indirect, and induced effects of the Project at two separate times: (i) a onetime evaluation of direct, indirect, and induced effects during the construction of the Project (“Construction Period Impacts”) and (ii) the ongoing annual direct, indirect, and induced effects at buildout (“Ongoing Annual Impacts”).

Construction Period Impacts:

The “Construction Period” commences upon initial site development and ends upon completion of construction. Per the Developer, the Construction Period is expected to be approximately eighteen (18) months. Direct inputs were comprised of construction cost summarized as follows:

Direct Construction Cost:

Industrial Building $ 122,096,880
Off-site Improvements 12,104,512
Total Direct Construction Cost: $ 134,201,392
Construction of the Project will contribute to the creation of new direct, indirect, and induced jobs in the City and County-wide. Direct jobs created during the Construction Period consist of the employees constructing the Project, whereas the indirect and induced jobs created during this phase relate to (i) the other industries that need to produce additional goods and services to meet the demand from contractors/businesses directly involved in the construction of the Project and (ii) discretionary spending of the construction employees. The Project is anticipated to create 902 annual jobs during the Construction Period.

Labor income during the construction period includes employment compensation and benefits paid to workers. The direct effect on labor income during the Construction Period is comprised of labor income paid to construction employees on site. The indirect effect on labor income includes the income of those employees of businesses providing goods and services to the contractors/businesses working directly on the site. The induced effect on labor income is comprised of the income of employees working at businesses that experience growth from the discretionary spending of the direct and indirect employees. Overall, the Project is estimated to generate an average of $54,258,000 annually in labor income over the Construction Period.

Page 110 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 214 of 806 ends

Ongoing Annual Impacts:

Ongoing annual direct effects represent the anticipated economic effects of the Project once the site is stabilized. Ongoing annual direct effects on employment relate to the employees working at the Project, whereas the indirect and induced jobs created during this phase relate to the other industries that produce goods and services that support the new businesses of the Project and local spending by the new employees of the Project. The project is anticipated to create approximately 755 full-time equivalent employees. Full-time equivalent employees for the Project were based on occupancy and the square feet per employee estimates according to the anticipated tenant type. Because IMPLAN’s definition of employment includes “all jobs” (i.e., full-time, part-time, and seasonal), IMPLAN industry sector conversion factor of 0.9379 for light Industrial use and 0.9245 for general office use in the County of Riverside. This resulted in approximately 806 total direct employees (i.e., total “headcount” jobs). Based on this direct employee number, the Project is anticipated to create 1,253 annual jobs (direct, indirect, and induced).

The direct effect on labor income during the Permanent Ongoing Period includes the labor income paid to on-site employees of the Project. The indirect and induced effects on labor income consist of the income of those employees associated with businesses that service the Project, as well as the income of the new employees generated by the increased demand for goods and services from the Project. Overall, the Project is estimated to generate $72,551,000 annually in labor income.

Disclaimer
Our analysis uses conservative metrics drawn from IMPLAN’s RiversideCounty market data and our industry knowledge and experience. It should be noted, however, that market conditions may change between now and when the Project is anticipated to open. Accordingly, as the information, estimates, and assumptions used in the analysis are inherently subject to uncertainty and variation depending on evolving events (e.g., market conditions, government regulations, etc.), the estimates presented herein are subject to change.

Exhibits
Refer to the Economic Benefit Analysis (Exhibit A – Table 1 through 5) found in subsequent pages.

Page 111 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 215 of 806 ends

Exhibit A
Newland Capital Group
Simpson Road Project
City of Hemet
Table 1 - Land Use Assumptions
I. Assessed Value SF (a)
Assessed Value
per SF (a)
Total
Assessed Value
Improvements - Light Industrial 875,760 $ 138 $ 120,854,880 Improvements - Office space 9,000 138 1,242,000
Offsite Improvements 12,104,512
Total Non-Residential Assessed Value 884,760 $ 134,201,392 II. Project Population Total SF
SF per
Employee (b)
Total FTE
Employees
IMPLAN Employee
Conversion rate (c)
Total Full-time, Parttime and seasonal
Employees
Improvements - Light Industrial 875,760 1,235 709 0.9379 756 Improvements - Office space 9,000 195 46 0.9245 50
Total Non- Residential Employees 755 806
Footnotes:
(a) Per Newland Capital Group as of 6/24/2025.
(b)
(c)
June 30, 2025
IMPLAN conversion rates are used to convert the FTE number to full-time, part-time and seasonal number (Total Employment). The Total Employment is calculated by dividing the FTE number by the IMPLAN conversion rate.

Per information provided by the potential tenant.

Page 112 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 216 of 806 ends

Exhibit A
Newland Capital Group
Simpson Road Project
City of Hemet
Table 2 - Economic Benefit Analysis Summary
June 30, 2025
Average Annual Construction Period Impacts Permanent Ongoing Annual Impacts 18 Months Construction Period
Jobs Labor Income Jobs Labor Income
Direct Effect Direct Effect Direct Effect Direct Effect 641 $40.48 Million 806 $50.34 Million
Indirect Effect Indirect Effect Indirect Effect Indirect Effect 101 $6.11 Million 244 $12.47 Million
Induced Effect Induced Effect Induced Effect Induced Effect 160 $7.67 Million 203 $9.74 Million
Total Average Annual
Number of Jobs
Total Average Annual
Labor Income
Total Average Annual
Number of Jobs
Total Average Annual
Labor Income
902 $54.26 Million 1,253 $72.55 Million
Cumulative Cumulative
Construction Period Impacts Ongoing Annual Impacts
18 Months Cumulative
Labor Income
5 Years Cumulative
Labor Income
10 Years Cumulative
Labor Income
$81.39 Million $362.76 Million $.73 Billion

Page 113 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 217 of 806 ends

Exhibit A
Newland Capital Group
Simpson Road Project
City of Hemet
Table 3 - Construction Period Impacts
June 30, 2025
Employment Impact Jobs Description
Direct Effect 641
Represents direct onsite construction-related
jobs.

Indirect Effect 101
Represents jobs created as a result of new
business to business spending in the local
economy.

Induced Effect 160
Represents jobs created as a result of spending
by new direct and indirect employees in the local
economy.

Total 902
Labor Income Impact Labor Income Description
Direct Effect $40.48 Million Represents direct onsite construction labor income.

Indirect Effect $6.11 Million
Represents labor income generated as a result
of new business to business spending in the
local economy.

Induced Effect $7.67 Million
Represents labor income generated as a result
of spending by new direct and indirect
employees in the local economy.

Total $54.26 Million
Footnotes:

Average Annual Jobs Created During Construction Period (a) Average Annual Labor Income Generated During Construction Period (a) (a) Calculated using IMPLAN, a nationally recognized economic modeling system. Riverside County is the study area. Jobs are reported as all jobs (full-time, part-time, and seasonal).

Page 114 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 218 of 806 ends

Exhibit A
Newland Capital Group
Simpson Road Project
City of Hemet
Table 4 - Ongoing Annual Impacts
June 30, 2025
Employment Impact Total Jobs Description
Direct Effect (b) 806
Represents direct onsite jobs created by the
operations of the new facilities.

Indirect Effect 244
Represents jobs created as a result of new
business to business spending in the local
economy.

Induced Effect
203
Represents jobs created as a result of spending
by new direct and indirect employees in the local
economy.

Total 1,253
Labor Income Impact
Total Labor
Income
Description
Direct Effect $50.34 Million Represents labor income generated by the operations of the new facilities
Indirect Effect $12.47 Million
Represents labor income generated from new
business to business spending in the local
economy.

Induced Effect $9.74 Million
Represents labor income generated by spending
of new direct and indirect employees in the local
economy.

Total $72.55 Million
Footnotes:

Total Ongoing Annual Number of Jobs Created (a)
Total Ongoing Annual Labor Income Generated (a)
(a) Calculated using IMPLAN, a nationally recognized economic modeling system. Riverside County is the study area. Jobs are reported as all jobs (full-time, part-time, and seasonal). (b) 755 full-time equivalent direct jobs were converted to 806 full-time, part-time and seasonal jobs using IMPLAN industry sector conversion factors.

Page 115 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 219 of 806 ends

Exhibit A
Newland Capital Group
Simpson Road Project
City of Hemet
Table 5 - Top 10 Industries Affected
Rank Industry Jobs
1 Warehousing and Storage 828
2 Other Real Estate 57
3 Office Administrative Services 54
4 Employment Services 32
5 Couriers and Messenger 15
6 Limited-service Restaurants 15
7 Full-service Restaurants 13
8 Individual and Family Services 10
9 Services to Buildings 8
10 All Other Food and Drinking Places 8
(a)
(b) Jobs by Top Ten industries affected by the new commercial activity and local spending as a result of the new Project.

June 30, 2025
Total Ongoing Annual Top 10 Industries Affected (a) (b) Footnotes:

Calculated using IMPLAN, a nationally recognized economic modeling system. Riverside County is the study area. Jobs are reported as all jobs (full-time, part-time, and seasonal).

Page 116 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 220 of 806 ends

1 Date: June 27, 2025
Prepared by: Meaghan Truman, Associate Environmental Planner III To: Monique Alaniz-Flejter, [email protected]
Site: Newland Simpson Road Project
Subject: Reduced Project Site Plan – Consistency with Newland Simpson Road Project EIR (SCH No. 2023120462)
This memorandum addresses the site plan changes for the Newland Simpson Road Project and the new site plan’s consistency with the Newland Simpson Road Project Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 2023120462), which was circulated for public comment between May 17, 2024 and July 1, 2024. As discussed within this memorandum, the reduction in proposed square footage and acreage in the new site plan would not result in a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified environmental impact that would not be mitigated, or any of the other circumstances requiring recirculation as described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5. No new significant environmental impact would result from the Project or from a new mitigation measure proposed to be implemented; there is no substantial increase in the severity of an environmental impact; no feasible project alternative or mitigation measure considerably different from others previously analyzed would lessen the environmental impacts of the proposed Project and the Applicant refuses to adopt it; and the EIR is not fundamentally inadequate and conclusory in nature.

Newland Simpson Road Project EIR Summary
The Newland Simpson Road Project Environmental Impact Report (EIR) analyzed the construction and operation of two new warehouse buildings totaling approximately 1,192,418 square feet (SF) on a 74.88 gross (71.11 net) acre site. As analyzed in the EIR, Building 1 would be developed with an 883,080 SF speculative high-cube warehouse building including 838,926 SF of warehouse space, 44,154 SF of office space, and 144 dock-high doors with an FAR of 0.47. Building 2 would be developed with a 309,338 SF speculative high-cube warehouse building including 293,871 SF of warehouse space, 15,467 SF of office space, and 50 dock-high doors with an FAR of 0.39. The Project would also include an 8.90-acre ancillary trailer parking lot with 160 truck trailer parking stalls in the easternmost lot across Warren Road.

The previously proposed site plan is referred to herein as the “Previous Project”.

The EIR found that the following topic areas would have “no impact” or would be “less than significant”:
• Aesthetics
• Conflict with a Williamson Act or
Agricultural Zoning
• Conflict with Forestry Resources
• Regional Operational Air Quality
Emissions
• Localized Construction & Operational
Air Quality Emissions and Health Risk
• Odors

Page 117 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 221 of 806 ends

2 • Riparian Habitat
• Conflict with biological ordinances
• Historical Resources
• Energy
• Geology & Soils
• Hazards & Hazardous Materials
• Hydrology & Water Quality
• On-site construction and operational
noise
• Vibration
• Population & Housing
• Public Services
• Recreation
• Circulation (plans, design, emergency
access)
• Utilities & Service Systems
• Wildfire
The EIR found that the following topic areas would be “less than significant with mitigation incorporated”:
• Conflict with Air Quality Management
Plan
• Regional Construction Air Quality
Emissions
• Sensitive species
• Nesting birds
• Conflict with the MSHCP
• Archaeological Resources
• Human Remains
• Paleontological Resources
• Tribal Cultural Resources
The EIR found that the following topic areas would be “significant and unavoidable”:
• Loss of Farmland
• Greenhouse Gas Emissions
• Traffic Noise
• Vehicle Miles Traveled
Revised Project Site Plan
The Revised Project Site Plan, referred to herein as the "Revised Project”, would include development of one building on approximately 44.23 acres. The Revised Project would only include one building, Building 1, which would total approximately 884,760 SF, as shown in Figure 1, Revised Project Site Plan. The proposed building would include 9,000 SF of office space. The Revised Project would include approximately 938 auto parking stalls, 202 trailer parking stalls, and 146 dock doors. In addition, the Revised Project would include approximately 170,945 SF of landscape area.

The off-site improvements proposed under the Previous Project would remain the same under the Revised Project.

The Revised Project would include a Tentative Parcel Map to split APN 465-140-043 into two parcels (Parcel 1 and Parcel 2) and provide right-of-way dedications from both APN 465-140-043 and 465- 140-042 (Parcel 3). Parcel 1 is only proposed for development under the Revised Project; no development would occur on Parcel 2 or 3. The Revised Project would include a General Plan Amendment on the new Parcel 1 (westernmost parcel) from Mixed Use (MU) to Business Park (B-P) to ensure consistency with the existing zoning on Parcel 1.

Page 118 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 222 of 806 ends

3 Figure 1: Revised Project Site Plan

Page 119 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 223 of 806 ends

4 Impact Reductions
Based on the square footage reduction proposed under the Revised Project, EPD Solutions prepared a trip generation to calculate the reduced trips resulting from the Revised Project in comparison to the Previous Project. As shown in Table 1, compared to the Previous Project, the Revised Project would result in 655 net fewer daily trips, 38 net fewer AM peak hour trips and 51 net fewer PM peak hour trips. In terms of PCE, the Revised Project would result in 835 net fewer daily PCE trips, 49 net fewer AM peak hour PCE trips and 62 net fewer PM peak hour PCE trips.

Table 1: Change in Project Trip Generation
Since the Revised Project would result in fewer vehicle trips than the Previous Project, the analysis provided in the Simpson Road Warehouse Traffic Impact Analysis would be a conservative estimate of traffic impacts. Further, the reduction in trips generated by the Revised Project would correlate to a reduction in impacts associated with air quality, energy, greenhouse gas emissions, and traffic noise.

In order to demonstrate the decrease in air quality and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, EPD Solutions utilized CalEEmod to estimate the construction and operational emissions occurring from the Revised Project in comparison to those disclosed within the EIR. As shown in the attached memo, Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Tables for the Comparative Analysis of the Revised Newland Simpson Road Project, regional air pollutant emissions from construction would be reduced by approximately 26 to 32 percent, dependent on the specific pollutant. Regional air pollutant emissions from operations would be reduced by approximately 24 to 27 percent, dependent on the specific pollutant. Localized construction emissions would be decreased by approximately 33 percent and localized operational emissions would be decreased by approximately 27 to 38 percent in comparison to the Previous Project. In addition, while GHG emissions resulting from the Revised Project would remain above SCAQMD’s 3,000 MTCO2e threshold, they would be reduced by approximately 26 percent compared to the Previous Project.

Land Use Daily In Out Total In Out Total
Prior Project
Total Auto Trips 2,087 95 28 123 48 124 172
Total Truck Trips 452 17 6 23 7 18 25
Total Trips 2,539 112 34 146 55 142 197
Total PCE Trips 3,235 140 48 188 71 169 240
Reduced Project
Total Auto Trips 1,549 70 21 91 35 93 128
Total Truck Trips 335 13 4 17 6 13 18
Total Trips 1,884 83 25 108 41 106 146
Total PCE Trips 2,400 106 33 139 51 127 178
Change in Trips
Total Auto Trips -538 -25 -7 -32 -13 -31 -44
Total Truck Trips -117 -4 -2 -6 -1 -5 -7
Total Trips -655 -29 -9 -38 -14 -36 -51
Total PCE Trips -835 -34 -15 -49 -20 -42 -62
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour

Page 120 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 224 of 806 ends

5 The reduction in building square footage as part of the Revised Project would result in decreased impacts related to aesthetics, hazards & hazardous materials, land use & planning, on-site construction & operational noise, vibration, population & housing, public services, utilities & service systems, and wildfire. Specifically related to aesthetics, since only Building 1 would be developed as part of the Revised Project, setbacks from the proposed building and Warren Avenue would increase. Therefore, views of the Domenigoni Mountains would be more expansive than those that would occur with implementation of the Previous Project. Furthermore, the reduction in development footprint would result in reduced ground disturbing activities and a reduction in impacts related to agriculture and forestry resources, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, hydrology and water quality, and tribal cultural resources.

Validity of EIR
Under CEQA, cities are free to adopt a variation of a project or one of the alternatives, even though that specific variation was not directly analyzed in the EIR. For decades, courts have acknowledged that “CEQA does not handcuff decisionmakers,” and does not mandate “a blanket approval of the entire project initially described in the EIR. (South of Market Community Action Network v. City and County of San Francisco 33 Cal.App.5th 321, 336; Dusek v. Redevelopment Agency (1985) 173 Cal.App.3d 1029, 1041.) These courts have pointed out that if CEQA were implemented in a way to deny decisionmakers the flexibility needed to revise or alter projects based on the conclusions reached in the EIR, “the informational value of the document would be sacrificed.” (Ibid.) In other words, one of the major reasons CEQA requires an EIR is to inform decisionmakers of a potential project’s impacts and allow them the flexibility to use that information to alter or revise the project in a manner that limits environmental impacts but still achieves the desired goals.

Thus, not only may the City adopt an alternative identified in the EIR, the City may also adopt some variation of the Project or an alternative identified in the EIR. (Southwest Regional Council of Carpenters v. City of Los Angeles (2022) 76 Cal.App.5th 1154, 1181-82.) Notably, the only key consideration before the City adopts a variation of the Project or an alternative is whether the variation departs from the proposed Project or alternatives to such an extent that it triggers the need for recirculation. (Western Placer Citizens for An Agricultural and Rural Environment v. County of Placer (2006) 144 Cal.App.4th 890, 903-04, 06.) As the Revised Project would not result in a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified environmental impact that would not be mitigated, or any of the other circumstances requiring recirculation as described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5, recirculation of the EIR would not be required. Overall, the analysis contained within the Newland Simpson Road Project EIR provides a conservative analysis of potential impacts resulting from the Revised Project and the EIR can be relied upon as the CEQA documentation for the Revised Project.

Page 121 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 225 of 806 ends

Date: June 27, 2025
Prepared by: Simon Lin, EIT
Meghan Macias, T.E.

EPD Solutions, Inc.

To: City of Hemet
Site: Simpson Road Warehouse
Subject: Summary of Change in Trip Generation Under Revised Simpson Road Warehouse Project
This technical memorandum evaluates the change in trip generation resulting from changes to the proposed project for the Newland Simpson Road Warehouse Project in the City of Hemet.

Project Description
The Project site is located on the southwest corner of the intersection of Simpson Road and Warren Road in the City of Hemet. The Project site is identified by Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APN) 465- 140-043 and 465-140-042. EPD previously analyzed the development of two high-cube warehouse buildings of 883,080 square feet (SF) and 309,338 SF, totaling 1,192,418 SF (“Previous Project”). The Simpson Road Warehouse Traffic Impact Analysis dated May 30th, 2024, prepared by EPD for the Previous Project, was approved by the City of Hemet on June 21st, 2024.

Since then, the Project has been reduced to one high-cube warehouse building of 884,760 SF (“Revised Project”), instead of two warehouse buildings totaling 1,192,418 SF.

Project Trip Generation
The Previous Project was analyzed in the Simpson Road Warehouse Traffic Impact Analysis, using trip rates from the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) High-Cube Warehouse Trip Generation Study (WSP, January 29, 2019). As shown in the previous Traffic Impact Analysis, the project was estimated to generate approximately 2,539 daily trips, 146 AM peak hour trips, and 197 PM peak hour trips. In terms of passenger car equivalent (PCE), the Previous Project is estimated to generate approximately 3,235 daily PCE trips, 188 AM peak hour PCE trips, and 240 PM peak hour PCE trips. The Previous Project site plan is shown in Figure 1. Table 1 presents the trip generation calculations for the Previous Project.

The Revised Project was evaluated using trip rates from the TUMF High-Cube Warehouse Trip Generation Study (WSP, January 29, 2019). As shown in Table 2, the Revised Project is estimated to generate approximately 1,884 daily trips, 108 AM peak hour trips, and 146 PM peak hour trips. In terms of PCE, the Revised Project is estimated to generate approximately 2,400 daily PCE trips, 139 AM peak hour PCE trips, and 178 PM peak hour PCE trips. The Revised Project site plan is shown in Figure 2.

Page 122 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 226 of 806 ends

Page | 2
As shown in Table 3, compared to the Previous Project, the Revised Project would result in 655 net fewer daily trips, 38 net fewer AM peak hour trips and 51 net fewer PM peak hour trips. In terms of PCE, the Revised Project would result in 835 net fewer daily PCE trips, 49 net fewer AM peak hour PCE trips and 62 net fewer PM peak hour PCE trips. Because the Revised Project would result in fewer vehicle trips than the Previous Project, the analysis provided in the Simpson Road Warehouse Traffic Impact Analysis would be a conservative estimate of traffic impacts. There would be no new impacts from the Revised Project, therefore no further analysis is required.

If you have any questions about this analysis, please contact us at (949) 794-1180 or [email protected].

Page 123 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 227 of 806 ends

Page |
3 Figure 1: Previous Project Site Plan

Page 124 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 228 of 806 ends

Page |
4 Figure 2: Revised Project Site Plan

Page 125 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 229 of 806 ends

Page | 5
Table 1: Previous Project Trip Generation
Land Use Units Daily In Out Total In Out Total
Trip Rates
High-Cube Transload and Short-Term Storage Warehouse1 TSF 2.129 0.094 0.028 0.122 0.046 0.119 0.165 Project Trip Generation Building 1
Industrial Bulding 1 1 883.080 TSF 1,880 83 25 108 41 105 146 Vehicle Mix 1 % Daily % AM % PM
Passenger Vehicles 82.20% 84.40% 87.30% 1,546 71 20 91 36 92 128 2- Axle Trucks 3.80% 1.10% 1.10% 71 1 0 1 0 1 1
3-Axle Trucks 2.50% 2.20% 2.20% 47 2 1 3 1 2 3
4-Axle Trucks 1.30% 3.30% 3.30% 24 3 1 4 1 4 5
5+-Axle Trucks 10.20% 9.00% 6.10% 192 6 3 9 3 6 9
100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 1,880 83 25 108 41 105 146
PCE Trip Generation 2 PCE Factor
Passenger Vehicles 1.0 1,546 71 20 91 36 92 128
2-Axle truck 1.5 107 1 1 2 1 1 2
3-Axle truck 2.0 94 5 1 6 2 4 6
4+-Axle Trucks 3.0 649 26 12 38 13 29 42
Industrial Bulding 1 Total PCE Trip Generation 2,396 103 34 137 52 126 178 Project Trip Generation Building 2
Industrial Bulding 2 1 309.338 TSF 659 29 9 38 14 37 51 Vehicle Mix 1 % Daily % AM % PM
Passenger Vehicles 82.20% 84.40% 87.30% 541 24 8 32 12 32 44 2- Axle Trucks 3.80% 1.10% 1.10% 25 0 0 0 0 1 1
3-Axle Trucks 2.50% 2.20% 2.20% 16 1 0 1 0 1 1
4-Axle Trucks 1.30% 3.30% 3.30% 9 1 0 1 1 1 2
5+-Axle Trucks 10.20% 9.00% 6.10% 67 3 1 4 1 2 3
100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 659 29 9 38 14 37 51
PCE Trip Generation 2 PCE Factor
Passenger Vehicles 1.0 541 24 8 32 12 32 44
2-Axle truck 1.5 38 0 1 1 0 1 1
3-Axle truck 2.0 33 1 1 2 1 1 2
4+-Axle Trucks 3.0 227 12 4 16 6 9 15
Industrial Bulding 2 Total PCE Trip Generation 839 37 14 51 19 43 62 Project Total Passenger Vehicle Trip Generation 2,087 95 28 123 48 124 172 Project Total Truck Trip Generation 452 17 6 23 7 18 25 Project Total Trip Generation 2,539 112 34 146 55 142 197 Project Total PCE Trip Generation 3,235 140 48 188 71 169 240 TSF = Thousand Square Feet
PCE = Passenger Car Equivalent
1 Trip rates and truck percentages from the TUMF High-Cube Warehouse Trip Generation Study, WSP, January 29, 2019. 2 Passenger Car Equivalent (PCE) factors from the Riverside County Transportation Analysis Guidelines, December 2020.

AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour

Page 126 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 230 of 806 ends

Page | 6
Table 2: Revised Project Trip Generation
Table 3: Change in Project Trip Generation
Land Use Units Daily In Out Total In Out Total
Trip Rates
High-Cube Transload and Short-Term Storage Warehouse1 TSF 2.129 0.094 0.028 0.122 0.046 0.119 0.165 Project Trip Generation Building 1
Industrial Bulding 1 1 884.760 TSF 1,884 83 25 108 41 105 146 Vehicle Mix 1 % Daily % AM % PM
Passenger Vehicles 82.20% 84.40% 87.30% 1,549 70 21 91 35 92 128 2- Axle Trucks 3.80% 1.10% 1.10% 72 1 0 1 0 1 1
3-Axle Trucks 2.50% 2.20% 2.20% 47 2 0 2 1 2 3
4-Axle Trucks 1.30% 3.30% 3.30% 24 3 1 4 1 4 5
5+-Axle Trucks 10.20% 9.00% 6.10% 192 7 3 10 3 6 9
100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 1,884 83 25 108 41 105 146
PCE Trip Generation 2 PCE Factor
Passenger Vehicles 1.0 1,549 70 21 91 35 93 128
2-Axle truck 1.5 107 2 0 2 1 1 2
3-Axle truck 2.0 94 4 0 4 2 4 6
4+-Axle Trucks 3.0 650 30 12 42 13 29 42
Industrial Bulding 1 Total PCE Trip Generation 2,400 106 33 139 51 127 178 Project Total Passenger Vehicle Trip Generation 1,549 70 21 91 35 93 128 Project Total Truck Trip Generation 335 13 4 17 6 13 18 Project Total Trip Generation 1,884 83 25 108 41 106 146 Project Total PCE Trip Generation 2,400 106 33 139 51 127 178 TSF = Thousand Square Feet
PCE = Passenger Car Equivalent
1 Trip rates from TUMF High-Cube Warehouse Trip Generation Study Update, Fehr & Peers, November 13, 2023. In/Out splits from the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation,11th Edition, 2021. Land Use Code 155 - High-Cube Fulfillment Center Warehouse. 2 Passenger Car Equivalent (PCE) factors from the Riverside County Transportation Analysis Guidelines, December 2020.

AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Land Use Daily In Out Total In Out Total
Previous Project
Total Auto Trips 2,087 95 28 123 48 124 172
Total Truck Trips 452 17 6 23 7 18 25
Total Trips 2,539 112 34 146 55 142 197
Total PCE Trips 3,235 140 48 188 71 169 240
Revised Project
Total Auto Trips 1,549 70 21 91 35 93 128
Total Truck Trips 335 13 4 17 6 13 18
Total Trips 1,884 83 25 108 41 106 146
Total PCE Trips 2,400 106 33 139 51 127 178
Change in Trips
Total Auto Trips -538 -25 -7 -32 -13 -31 -44
Total Truck Trips -117 -4 -2 -6 -1 -5 -7
Total Trips -655 -29 -9 -38 -14 -36 -51
Total PCE Trips -835 -34 -15 -49 -20 -42 -62
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour

Page 127 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 231 of 806 ends

Newland Simpson Road Project
1 Air Quality and GHG Tables
Project Overview
This technical memorandum presents the reduction of the air quality and greenhouse gas (GHG) impacts from the revised Newland Simpson Road Project (“Revised Project”) compared to the previously proposed Newland Simpson Road Project (referred to in this memo as the “Previous Project”), located in the City of Hemet at the intersection of Warren Road and Simpson Road. The revised site plan is shown in Figure 1, Revised Project Site Plan, included at the end of this memo.

The Previous Project site encompassed 74.88 gross acres, inclusive of areas for off-site improvements. The Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Previous Project analyzed impacts related to the development of two speculative industrial buildings and an ancillary truck parking lot to support warehouse, distribution, and office uses. Building 1 was analyzed as 883,080 square feet (SF) and Building 2 as 309,338 SF. In total, the two buildings were proposed to be 1,192,418 SF. The EIR determined that the Previous Project would result in less than significant impacts related to air quality with mitigation implemented, and significant unavoidable impacts to GHG. The air quality and GHG reports prepared for the Previous Project can be found as Appendix C and J to the EIR (State Clearinghouse Number 2023120462).

The Revised Project proposes a reduction in site plan acreage and building square footage. The Revised Project site would encompass approximately 44.23 acres with 4.52 acres of offsite improvements. Only one warehouse building is proposed, totaling 884,760 SF, as part of the Revised Project. The offsite improvements would be the same as the Previous Project. The Revised Project’s criteria pollutants and GHG emissions are analyzed using the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod. Version 2022.1) land use emission model. For consistency with the Previous Project analysis, the same construction schedule, passenger car fleet mix, truck fleet mix, and operational equipment were assumed for the Revised Project. Construction equipment and construction trips were reduced proportionally, based on the ratios of the Revised Project to Previous Project acreage and building square footage. The trip generation rate was obtained from the Revised Project Trip Generation Memo1. Detailed justification for changes to the CalEEMod default values can be found in Section 8, User Changes to Default Data, of the CalEEMod Output Sheets, included as Attachment A to this memo. Air quality and GHG emissions reduction compared to the Previous Project have been summarized in the tables below.

In conclusion, the Revised Project would emit less criteria pollutants and GHG emissions compared to those resulting from the Previous Project as previously analyzed in the EIR. Moreover, the Revised Project would continue to not exceed any construction or operational air quality significance thresholds set by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) with mitigation implemented. However, the Revised Project’s impact related to GHG emissions would remain significant and unavoidable. 1 EPD Solutions, Inc. (2025). Summary of Change in Trip Generation Under Revised Simpson Road Warehouse Project.

To: City of Hemet
From: Tiffany Dang, Tina Yuan, Alex Garber, EPD Solutions, Inc.

Date: 6/26/2025
Re: Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Tables for the comparative analysis of the revised Newland Simpson Road Project, EPD Project Number 22-030

Page 128 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 232 of 806 ends

Newland Simpson Road Project
2 Air Quality and GHG Tables
Air Quality
Unmitigated Regional Construction Emissions
Without the implementation of the mitigation measures identified in the EIR for the Previous Project, both the Previous Project and the Revised Project would exceed SCAQMD’s regional construction thresholds for ROG and NOx. However, the Revised Project would result in a decrease in emissions as compared to the Previous Project. Table 1, Revised Project - Unmitigated Regional Construction Emissions, shows emissions resulting from the construction of the Revised Project as compared to the Previous Project.

Table 1. Revised Project - Unmitigated Regional Construction Emissions Construction Year
Maximum Daily Regional Emissions
(pounds/day)
ROG NOx CO SOX PM10 PM2.5
Revised Project Year 1 10.27 108.75 89.56 0.28 18.69 9.33 Revised Project Year 2 133.71 29.82 48.53 0.06 6.27 1.96 Revised Project Maximum (Year 1 – 2) 133.71 108.75 89.56 0.28 18.69 9.33 SCAQMD Significance Thresholds 75 100 550 150 150 55
Threshold Exceeded? Yes Yes No No No No
Previous Project Maximum 181.27 153.99 132.45 0.36 25.76 13.23 Difference -47.56 -45.24 -42.89 -0.08 -7.07 -3.90
Percent Decrease -26% -29% -32% -23% -27% -30%
Notes: ROG = reactive organic gases, NOx = nitrogen oxides, CO = carbon monoxide, SOX = sulfur oxides, PM10 = particulate matter 10 microns in diameter, PM2.5 = particulate matter 2.5 microns in diameter Source: CalEEMod Output Sheets (see Attachment A).

Page 129 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 233 of 806 ends

Newland Simpson Road Project
3 Air Quality and GHG Tables
Mitigated Regional Construction Emissions
Due to an exceedance in ROG and NOx emissions, the Revised Project would continue to implement Mitigation Measure AQ-1 and Mitigation Measure AQ-2. The same mitigation measures applied in the Previous Project were used in this analysis, which include:
• AQ MM-1: Use of “Super-Compliant” low VOC paints for nonresidential interior and exterior surfaces and low VOC paint for parking lot surfaces. Super-Compliant low VOC paints shall be no more than 10 grams per liter of VOC.
• AQ MM-2: Use of advanced engine tiers (Tier 4 Interim) for all diesel-powered construction equipment 50-horsepower or greater.

Table 2, Revised Project - Mitigated Regional Construction Emissions, shows construction emissions with mitigation applied. The Revised Project would result in a percent decrease in emissions as compared to the Previous Project and would result in a less than significant regional construction impact to air quality, with mitigation implemented.

Table 2. Revised Project - Mitigated Regional Construction Emissions Construction Activity
Maximum Daily Regional Emissions
(pounds/day)
ROG NOx CO SOX PM10 PM2.5
Revised Project Year 1 2.61 70.41 102.07 0.28 14.96 5.92 Revised Project Year 2 33.87 20.93 52.71 0.06 5.80 1.53 Revised Project Maximum (Year 1 – 2) 33.87 70.41 102.07 0.28 14.96 5.92 SCAQMD Significance Thresholds 75 100 550 150 150 55
Threshold Exceeded? No No No No No No
Previous Project Maximum 46.72 96.47 151.22 0.36 20.16 8.12 Difference -12.85 -26.06 -49.15 -0.08 -5.20 -2.20
Percent Decrease -28% -27% -33% -23% -26% -27%
Notes: ROG = reactive organic gases, NOx = nitrogen oxides, CO = carbon monoxide, SOX = sulfur oxides, PM10 = particulate matter 10 microns in diameter, PM2.5 = particulate matter 2.5 microns in diameter Source: CalEEMod Output Sheets (see Attachment A).

Page 130 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 234 of 806 ends

Newland Simpson Road Project
4 Air Quality and GHG Tables
Regional Operational Emissions
The Revised Project operational emissions would not exceed SCAQMD’s regional operational thresholds, consistent with the findings of the Previous Project. In addition, the Revised Project would result in a decrease in operational emissions compared to the Previous Project. Therefore, the Revised Project would continue to result in less than significant regional operational impacts to air quality. Table 3, Revised Project - Regional Operational Emissions, shows the emissions resulting from operation of the Revised Project as compared to the Previous Project.

Table 3. Revised Project - Regional Operational Emissions Operational Activity
Maximum Daily Regional Emissions
(pounds/day)
ROG NOx CO SOX PM10 PM2.5
Revised Project 35.18 35.42 160.32 0.49 30.98 8.40
SCAQMD Significance Thresholds 55 55 550 150 150 55
Threshold Exceeded? No No No No No No
Previous Project 47.76 48.27 211.34 0.65 41.78 11.36
Difference -12.58 -12.85 -51.02 -0.16 -10.80 -2.96
Percent Decrease -26% -27% -24% -25% -26% -26%
Notes: ROG = reactive organic gases, NOx = nitrogen oxides, CO = carbon monoxide, SOX = sulfur oxides, PM10 = particulate matter 10 microns in diameter, PM2.5 = particulate matter 2.5 microns in diameter Source: CalEEMod Output Sheets (see Attachment A)

Page 131 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 235 of 806 ends

Newland Simpson Road Project
5 Air Quality and GHG Tables
Localized Construction Emissions
Table 4, Revised Project - Localized Construction Emissions, shows the thresholds and estimated maximum daily localized construction emissions for the Revised Project as compared to the Previous Project. Since equipment quantity inputs for off-site construction improvements were kept consistent between the Revised Project and the Previous Project, only changes in emissions for the onsite construction phases are shown below. As shown in Table 4, the Revised Project would not exceed applicable thresholds and therefore would result in a less than significant localized construction air quality impact, consistent with the Previous Project. Additionally, the Revised Project’s would result in a decrease in emissions for the site preparation and grading phases.

Table 4: Revised Project – Site Prep Localized Construction Emissions Scenario
Maximum Daily Emissions (pounds/day)
NOx CO PM10 PM2.5
Site Preparation 34.91 29.96 7.27 4.28
SCAQMD Localized Threshold 504 4,731 127 52
Threshold Exceeded? No No No No
Previous Project Maximum Emissions 46.54 39.94 9.70 5.70 Difference -11.63 -9.98 -2.43 -1.42
Percent Decrease -25% -25% -25% -25%
Grading 89.45 81.22 13.22 7.58
SCAQMD Localized Threshold 556 5,282 127 52
Threshold Exceeded? No No No No
Previous Project Maximum Emissions 134.18 121.83 19.82 11.37 Difference -44.73 -40.61 -6.60 -3.79
Percent Decrease -33% -33% -33% -33%

Page 132 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 236 of 806 ends

Newland Simpson Road Project
6 Air Quality and GHG Tables
Localized Operational Emissions
Table 5, Revised Project - Localized Operational Emissions, shows the thresholds and estimated maximum daily localized operational emissions for the Revised Project as compared to the Proposed Project. Consistent with the Previous Project, localized operational emissions from the Revised Project would not exceed SCAQMD’s localized operational thresholds. Additionally the Revised Project would result in a percent decrease in emissions. Therefore, the Revised Project would result in less than significant localized operational air quality impacts.

Table 5: Revised Project - Localized Operational Emissions Emission Sources Maximum Daily Emissions (lbs/day)
NOx CO PM10 PM2.5
Revised Project Total 8.49 65.78 4.95 1.36
SCAQMD Localized Threshold 556 5,282 31 13
Threshold Exceeded? No No No No
Previous Project 12.37 106.04 6.74 1.91
Difference -3.88 -40.26 -1.79 -0.55
Percent Decrease -31% -38% -27% -29%
Notes: NOx = nitrogen oxides, CO = carbon monoxide, PM10 = particulate matter 10 microns in diameter, PM2.5 = particulate matter 2.5 microns in diameter
Thresholds used by the Previous Project analysis were applied Source: CalEEMod Output Sheets (see Attachment A)

Page 133 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 237 of 806 ends

Newland Simpson Road Project
7 Air Quality and GHG Tables
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Construction GHG
The Revised Project’s construction GHG emissions are shown in Table 6, Revised Project - Project Construction GHG Emissions. The construction emissions are amortized over 30 years. Compared to the Previous Project, the Revised Project would result in a decrease in amortized construction emissions by 25 percent.

Table 6: Revised Project - Project Construction GHG Emissions Activity GHG Emissions (MTCO2e)
Revised Project - 2025 (Year 1) 1,563.60
Revised Project - 2026 (Year 2) 541.01
Total Revised Project GHG Emissions 2,104.61
Revised Project Total Emissions
(Amortized Over 30 Years) 70.15
Previous Project Amortized Emissions 93.301
Difference -23.15
Percent Decrease -25%
Source: CalEEMod Output Sheets (see Attachment A) 1Previous Project amortized emissions were calculated by taking the sum of annual construction emissions of building construction and off-site construction, as provided in Appendix 3.1 of the Previous Project’s GHG Report.

Page 134 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 238 of 806 ends

Newland Simpson Road Project
8 Air Quality and GHG Tables
Construction and Operational GHG
The overall construction and operational emissions for the Revised Project, as compared to the Previous Project, are shown in Table 7, Total Revised Project GHG Emissions. As shown in Table 7, the Revised Project’s construction and operational GHG emissions would total 7,707.41 MTCO2e per year, which would exceed the SCAQMD significance threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e per year. However, compared to the Previous Project, the Revised Project would result in a reduction in emissions of 2,693.12 MTCO2e per year. This equates to a 26 percent decrease in annual GHG emissions as compared to the Previous Project.

Consistent with the Previous Project, GHG impacts resulting from the Revised Project would remain significant and unavoidable. The Revised Project would also be required to apply the same mitigation measures as the Previous Project (MM GHG-1 through GHG-10), which are listed in the Previous Project’s EIR. However, GHG reductions from these measures are not quantifiable in CalEEMod. Therefore, this memo conservatively presents unmitigated GHG emissions, consistent with the GHG Report prepared for the Previous Project.

Table 7: Total Revised Project GHG Emissions
Activity GHG Emissions (MTCO2e per year)1
Revised Project Operational Emissions 7,637.25
Revised Project Amortized Construction Emissions 70.15
Revised Project Total Emissions 7,707.41
Significance Threshold 3,000
Threshold Exceeded? Yes
Previous Project Total Emissions1 10,400.531
Difference -2,693.12
Percent Decrease -26%
Notes: 1. Numbers may vary due to rounding.

Source: CalEEMod Output Sheets (see Attachment A) 1Previous Project amortized emissions were calculated by taking the sum of annual construction emissions of building construction and off-site construction, as provided in Appendix 3.1 of the Previous Project’s GHG Report.

Page 135 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 239 of 806 ends

Newland Simpson Road Project
9 Air Quality and GHG Tables
Figure 1: Revised Project Site Plan
73 DOCK HIGH DOORS
GATE
RAMP

DOMENIGONI PARKWAY

SIMPSON ROAD

WARREN ROAD

SECURED TRUCK COURT
RAMP

RAMP RAMP
BLDG 1
884,760 S.F.

GATE
OFFICE
3,000 S.F.

OFFICE
6,000 S.F.

CLEAR HEIGHT: 50'

SECURED TRUCK COURT
40'

DRIVEWAY
20'

DRIVEWAY
40'

DRIVEWAY
170'-3". 1452' 396'-9"
201' 185'
-
4". 590'
192'
-
6".
60' 60'
TYP.
58'
73 DOCK HIGH DOORS
60'
TYP.
60'
80'-7"

NOT A PART

CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN

DOMENIGONI PARKWAY

WARREN ROAD

RAMP SECURED TRUCK COURT
80'-7" Page 136 of 604

13.C.

Page 240 of 806 ends

Newland Simpson Road Project
Air Quality and GHG Tables
ATTACHMENT A: CALEEMOD OUTPUT SHEETS

Page 137 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 241 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
1 / 67
22-030 Simpson Detailed Report
Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated

2.3. Construction Emissions by Year, Mitigated

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated

2.6. Operations Emissions by Sector, Mitigated

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Site Preparation (2025) - Unmitigated

3.2. Site Preparation (2025) - Mitigated

3.3. Grading (2025) - Unmitigated Page 138 of 604

13.C.

Page 242 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
2 / 67

3.4. Grading (2025) - Mitigated

3.5. Offsite Grading (2025) - Unmitigated

3.6. Offsite Grading (2025) - Mitigated

3.7. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated

3.8. Building Construction (2025) - Mitigated

3.9. Building Construction (2026) - Unmitigated

3.10. Building Construction (2026) - Mitigated

3.11. Paving (2026) - Unmitigated

3.12. Paving (2026) - Mitigated

3.13. Architectural Coating (2026) - Unmitigated

3.14. Architectural Coating (2026) - Mitigated

3.15. Grubbing/Clearing (2025) - Unmitigated

3.16. Grubbing/Clearing (2025) - Mitigated

3.17. Drainage/Utilities (2025) - Unmitigated

3.18. Drainage/Utilities (2025) - Mitigated

3.19. Drainage/Utilities (2026) - Unmitigated

3.20. Drainage/Utilities (2026) - Mitigated

4. Operations Emissions Details Page 139 of 604

13.C.

Page 243 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
3 / 67

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated

4.1.2. Mitigated

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.2.2. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.2.4. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.1. Unmitigated

4.3.2. Mitigated

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.1. Unmitigated

4.4.2. Mitigated

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.1. Unmitigated

4.5.2. Mitigated

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use Page 140 of 604

13.C.

Page 244 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
4 / 67

4.6.1. Unmitigated

4.6.2. Mitigated

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated

4.7.2. Mitigated

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8.1. Unmitigated

4.8.2. Mitigated

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated

4.9.2. Mitigated

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated

4.10.4. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Mitigated

4.10.5. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Mitigated

4.10.6. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Mitigated

Page 141 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 245 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
5 / 67

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated

5.2.2. Mitigated

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated

5.3.2. Mitigated

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies

5.5. Architectural Coatings

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies

5.7. Construction Paving

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated

Page 142 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 246 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
6 / 67

5.9.2. Mitigated

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated

5.10.1.2. Mitigated

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment

5.10.4. Landscape Equipment - Mitigated

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated

5.11.2. Mitigated

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated

5.12.2. Mitigated

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated

5.13.2. Mitigated

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment Page 143 of 604

13.C.

Page 247 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
7 / 67

5.14.1. Unmitigated

5.14.2. Mitigated

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment

5.15.1. Unmitigated

5.15.2. Mitigated

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps

5.16.2. Process Boilers

5.17. User Defined

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.1.2. Mitigated

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.1.2. Mitigated

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated

Page 144 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 248 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
8 / 67

5.18.2.2. Mitigated

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores

7.4. Health & Equity Measures

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures

8. User Changes to Default Data Page 145 of 604

13.C.

Page 249 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
9 / 67

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name 22-030 Simpson
Construction Start Date 5/4/2025
Operational Year 2026
Lead Agency —
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 2.50
Precipitation (days) 8.60
Location 33.705441487178845, -117.0396340476545
County Riverside-South Coast
City Hemet
Air District South Coast AQMD
Air Basin South Coast
TAZ 5518
EDFZ 11
Electric Utility Southern California Edison
Gas Utility Southern California Gas
App Version 2022.1.1.29

1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq ft)
Population Description
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
885 1000sqft 24.2 884,760 170,945 — — —

Page 146 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 250 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
10 / 67
User Defined
Industrial
885 User Defined Unit 0.00 0.00 0.00 — — Trucks
Parking Lot 936 Space 8.42 0.00 0.00 — — —
Other Asphalt
Surfaces

11.6 Acre 11.6 0.00 0.00 — — —
Other Asphalt
Surfaces

4.52 Acre 4.52 0.00 0.00 — — Offsite
improvements

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector Sector # Measure Title
Construction C-5 Use Advanced Engine Tiers
Construction C-13 Use Low-VOC Paints for Construction

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10T PM2.5T CO2e
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Unmit. — — — — — — —
Mit. 33.9 70.4 116 0.28 15.0 5.92 36,127
% Reduced — — — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Unmit. — — — — — — —
Mit. 2.95 28.6 58.2 0.08 6.35 1.82 13,592
% Reduced — — — — — — —
Average Daily (Max) — — — — — — —
Unmit. — — — — — — —
Mit. 3.85 19.6 33.9 0.06 4.20 1.47 9,444 Page 147 of 604

13.C.

Page 251 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
11 / 67
% Reduced — — — — — — —
Annual (Max) — — — — — — —
Unmit. — — — — — — —
Mit. 0.70 3.57 6.19 0.01 0.77 0.27 1,564
% Reduced — — — — — — —
Exceeds (Daily Max) — — — — — — —
Threshold 75.0 100 550 150 150 55.0 —
Unmit. — — — — — — —
Mit. No No No No No No —
Exceeds (Average
Daily)
— — — — — — —
Threshold 75.0 100 550 150 150 55.0 —
Unmit. — — — — — — —
Mit. No No No No No No —

2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Year ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10T PM2.5T CO2e
Daily - Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Daily - Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Average Daily — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — —

2.3. Construction Emissions by Year, Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Year ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10T PM2.5T CO2e
Daily - Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
2025 4.25 70.4 116 0.28 15.0 5.92 36,127 Page 148 of 604

13.C.

Page 252 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
12 / 67
2026 33.9 40.2 89.4 0.11 6.48 1.85 18,391
Daily - Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
2025 2.95 28.6 58.2 0.08 6.35 1.82 13,592
2026 2.85 28.2 56.6 0.08 6.35 1.82 13,435
Average Daily — — — — — — —
2025 1.28 19.6 33.9 0.06 4.20 1.47 9,444
2026 3.85 7.00 14.0 0.02 1.49 0.43 3,268
Annual — — — — — — —
2025 0.23 3.57 6.19 0.01 0.77 0.27 1,564
2026 0.70 1.28 2.55 < 0.005 0.27 0.08 541

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10T PM2.5T CO2e
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Unmit. — — — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Unmit. — — — — — — —
Average Daily (Max) — — — — — — —
Unmit. — — — — — — —
Annual (Max) — — — — — — —
Unmit. — — — — — — —
Exceeds (Daily Max) — — — — — — —
Threshold 55.0 55.0 550 150 150 55.0 —
Unmit. — — — — — — —
Exceeds (Average
Daily)
— — — — — — —
Threshold 55.0 55.0 550 150 150 55.0 — Page 149 of 604

13.C.

Page 253 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
13 / 67
Unmit. — — — — — — —
Exceeds (Annual) — — — — — — —
Threshold — — — — — — 3,000
Unmit. — — — — — — —

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10T PM2.5T CO2e
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — —
Average Daily — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — —

2.6. Operations Emissions by Sector, Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10T PM2.5T CO2e
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Mobile 7.38 32.9 105 0.48 30.9 8.31 52,119
Area 27.7 0.32 38.5 < 0.005 0.07 0.05 159
Energy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,191
Water — — — — — — 3,024
Waste — — — — — — 1,568
Stationary 0.01 0.07 0.08 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 6.74
Total 35.1 33.3 144 0.49 30.9 8.37 61,069 Page 150 of 604

13.C.

Page 254 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
14 / 67
Daily, Winter (Max)———————
Mobile 7.08 34.6 86.6 0.47 30.9 8.31 50,295
Area 21.3——————
Energy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,191
Water—————— 3,024
Waste—————— 1,568
Stationary 0.01 0.07 0.08 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 6.74
Total 28.4 34.7 86.7 0.47 30.9 8.32 59,086
Average Daily———————
Mobile 5.16 25.6 65.7 0.34 22.4 6.04 36,950
Area 25.7 0.22 26.4 < 0.005 0.05 0.04 109
Energy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,191
Water—————— 3,024
Waste—————— 1,568
Stationary < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.92 Total 30.8 25.8 92.1 0.34 22.5 6.08 45,843
Annual———————
Mobile 0.94 4.67 12.0 0.06 4.10 1.10 6,117
Area 4.69 0.04 4.81 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 18.0
Energy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 694
Water—————— 501
Waste—————— 260
Stationary < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.15 Total 5.63 4.72 16.8 0.06 4.10 1.11 7,590

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Site Preparation (2025) - Unmitigated Page 151 of 604

13.C.

Page 255 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
15 / 67
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10T PM2.5T CO2e
Onsite — — — — — — —
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Average Daily — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — —
Offsite — — — — — — —
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Average Daily — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — —

3.2. Site Preparation (2025) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10T PM2.5T CO2e
Onsite — — — — — — —
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Off-Road Equipment 0.62 14.3 27.5 0.05 0.10 0.10 5,197
Dust From Material
Movement
— — — — 5.52 2.67 —
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Average Daily — — — — — — —
Off-Road Equipment 0.03 0.59 1.13 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 214 Dust From Material
Movement
— — — — 0.23 0.11 —
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual — — — — — — — Page 152 of 604

13.C.

Page 256 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
16 / 67
Off-Road Equipment < 0.005 0.11 0.21 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 35.4 Dust From Material
Movement
— — — — 0.04 0.02 —
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Offsite — — — — — — —
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Worker 0.06 0.06 1.00 0.00 0.17 0.04 186
Vendor < 0.005 0.24 0.07 < 0.005 0.06 0.02 225
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Average Daily — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.01 < 0.005 7.11
Vendor < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 9.22 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.18
Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.53 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.3. Grading (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10T PM2.5T CO2e
Onsite — — — — — — —
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Average Daily — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — —
Offsite — — — — — — — Page 153 of 604

13.C.

Page 257 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
17 / 67
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Average Daily — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — —

3.4. Grading (2025) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10T PM2.5T CO2e
Onsite — — — — — — —
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Off-Road Equipment 2.12 51.1 93.7 0.16 0.44 0.43 17,383 Dust From Material
Movement
— — — — 9.05 3.74 —
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Average Daily — — — — — — —
Off-Road Equipment 0.29 7.00 12.8 0.02 0.06 0.06 2,381
Dust From Material
Movement
— — — — 1.24 0.51 —
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual — — — — — — —
Off-Road Equipment 0.05 1.28 2.34 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 394 Dust From Material
Movement
— — — — 0.23 0.09 —
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Offsite — — — — — — —
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Worker 0.21 0.21 3.63 0.00 0.61 0.14 672
Vendor 0.01 0.67 0.21 < 0.005 0.18 0.06 642 Page 154 of 604

13.C.

Page 258 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
18 / 67
Hauling 0.27 18.4 4.50 0.11 4.68 1.54 17,430
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Average Daily — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.40 0.00 0.08 0.02 85.7
Vendor < 0.005 0.10 0.03 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 87.8
Hauling 0.04 2.67 0.62 0.02 0.64 0.21 2,385
Annual — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 0.01 0.07 0.00 0.02 < 0.005 14.2
Vendor < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 14.5
Hauling 0.01 0.49 0.11 < 0.005 0.12 0.04 395

3.5. Offsite Grading (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10T PM2.5T CO2e
Onsite — — — — — — —
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Average Daily — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — —
Offsite — — — — — — —
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Average Daily — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — —

3.6. Offsite Grading (2025) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10T PM2.5T CO2e Page 155 of 604

13.C.

Page 259 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
19 / 67
Onsite———————
Daily, Summer (Max)———————
Off-Road Equipment 1.56 36.4 55.5 0.09 0.51 0.48 9,149
Dust From Material
Movement
———— 0.83 0.09—
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Daily, Winter (Max)———————
Average Daily———————
Off-Road Equipment 0.03 0.60 0.91 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 150 Dust From Material
Movement
———— 0.01 < 0.005—
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual———————
Off-Road Equipment < 0.005 0.11 0.17 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 24.9 Dust From Material
Movement
———— < 0.005 < 0.005—
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Offsite———————
Daily, Summer (Max)———————
Worker 0.32 0.32 5.60 0.00 0.95 0.22 1,037
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Daily, Winter (Max)———————
Average Daily———————
Worker < 0.005 0.01 0.07 0.00 0.02 < 0.005 15.9
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual———————
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.63 Page 156 of 604

13.C.

Page 260 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
20 / 67
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.7. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10T PM2.5T CO2e
Onsite — — — — — — —
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Average Daily — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — —
Offsite — — — — — — —
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Average Daily — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — —

3.8. Building Construction (2025) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10T PM2.5T CO2e
Onsite — — — — — — —
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Off-Road Equipment 0.65 15.1 25.1 0.04 0.15 0.15 4,216
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Off-Road Equipment 0.65 15.1 25.1 0.04 0.15 0.15 4,216
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Average Daily — — — — — — — Page 157 of 604

13.C.

Page 261 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
21 / 67
Off-Road Equipment 0.19 4.48 7.48 0.01 0.05 0.04 1,254
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual — — — — — — —
Off-Road Equipment 0.04 0.82 1.36 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 208 Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Offsite — — — — — — —
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Worker 1.66 1.63 28.7 0.00 4.86 1.14 5,323
Vendor 0.06 2.92 0.91 0.02 0.78 0.24 2,791
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Worker 1.57 1.80 21.7 0.00 4.86 1.14 4,881
Vendor 0.05 3.06 0.93 0.02 0.78 0.24 2,786
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Average Daily — — — — — — —
Worker 0.46 0.58 6.83 0.00 1.44 0.34 1,472
Vendor 0.02 0.91 0.27 0.01 0.23 0.07 829
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual — — — — — — —
Worker 0.08 0.11 1.25 0.00 0.26 0.06 244
Vendor < 0.005 0.17 0.05 < 0.005 0.04 0.01 137
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.9. Building Construction (2026) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10T PM2.5T CO2e
Onsite — — — — — — —
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — — Page 158 of 604

13.C.

Page 262 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
22 / 67
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Average Daily — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — —
Offsite — — — — — — —
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Average Daily — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — —

3.10. Building Construction (2026) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10T PM2.5T CO2e
Onsite — — — — — — —
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Off-Road Equipment 0.65 15.1 25.1 0.04 0.15 0.15 4,215
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Off-Road Equipment 0.65 15.1 25.1 0.04 0.15 0.15 4,215
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Average Daily — — — — — — —
Off-Road Equipment 0.14 3.24 5.41 0.01 0.03 0.03 907
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual — — — — — — —
Off-Road Equipment 0.03 0.59 0.99 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 150 Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Offsite — — — — — — —
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Worker 1.57 1.46 26.7 0.00 4.86 1.14 5,206 Page 159 of 604

13.C.

Page 263 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
23 / 67
Vendor 0.06 2.80 0.87 0.02 0.78 0.24 2,748
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Worker 1.48 1.63 20.3 0.00 4.86 1.14 4,775
Vendor 0.05 2.92 0.89 0.02 0.78 0.24 2,743
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Average Daily — — — — — — —
Worker 0.32 0.38 4.56 0.00 1.04 0.24 1,042
Vendor 0.01 0.63 0.19 < 0.005 0.17 0.05 591
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual — — — — — — —
Worker 0.06 0.07 0.83 0.00 0.19 0.04 173
Vendor < 0.005 0.12 0.03 < 0.005 0.03 0.01 97.8
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.11. Paving (2026) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10T PM2.5T CO2e
Onsite — — — — — — —
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Average Daily — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — —
Offsite — — — — — — —
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Average Daily — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — Page 160 of 604

13.C.

Page 264 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
24 / 67

3.12. Paving (2026) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10T PM2.5T CO2e
Onsite — — — — — — —
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Off-Road Equipment 0.76 20.8 34.2 0.05 0.22 0.21 5,733
Paving 5.35 — — — — — —
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Average Daily — — — — — — —
Off-Road Equipment 0.02 0.68 1.12 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 188 Paving 0.18 — — — — — —
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual — — — — — — —
Off-Road Equipment < 0.005 0.12 0.20 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 31.2 Paving 0.03 — — — — — —
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Offsite — — — — — — —
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Worker 0.15 0.14 2.51 0.00 0.46 0.11 490
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Average Daily — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 0.01 0.07 0.00 0.01 < 0.005 15.0
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual — — — — — — — Page 161 of 604

13.C.

Page 265 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
25 / 67
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.48
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.13. Architectural Coating (2026) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10T PM2.5T CO2e
Onsite — — — — — — —
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Average Daily — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — —
Offsite — — — — — — —
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Average Daily — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — —

3.14. Architectural Coating (2026) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10T PM2.5T CO2e
Onsite — — — — — — —
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Off-Road Equipment 0.08 4.28 3.85 0.01 0.12 0.11 536
Architectural Coatings 33.4 — — — — — —
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Average Daily — — — — — — — Page 162 of 604

13.C.

Page 266 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
26 / 67
Off-Road Equipment 0.01 0.39 0.35 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 48.4 Architectural Coatings 3.02 — — — — — —
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual — — — — — — —
Off-Road Equipment < 0.005 0.07 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 8.02 Architectural Coatings 0.55 — — — — — —
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Offsite — — — — — — —
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Worker 0.32 0.29 5.39 0.00 0.98 0.23 1,050
Vendor 0.02 0.90 0.28 0.01 0.25 0.08 884
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Average Daily — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.39 0.00 0.09 0.02 88.3
Vendor < 0.005 0.09 0.03 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 79.9
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 0.01 0.07 0.00 0.02 < 0.005 14.6
Vendor < 0.005 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 13.2 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.15. Grubbing/Clearing (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10T PM2.5T CO2e
Onsite — — — — — — —
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — — Page 163 of 604

13.C.

Page 267 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
27 / 67
Average Daily — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — —
Offsite — — — — — — —
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Average Daily — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — —

3.16. Grubbing/Clearing (2025) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10T PM2.5T CO2e
Onsite — — — — — — —
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Off-Road Equipment 1.06 24.5 41.6 0.07 0.30 0.28 7,647
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Average Daily — — — — — — —
Off-Road Equipment 0.01 0.27 0.46 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 83.8 Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual — — — — — — —
Off-Road Equipment < 0.005 0.05 0.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 13.9 Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Offsite — — — — — — —
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Worker 0.17 0.16 2.90 0.00 0.49 0.11 537
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — — Page 164 of 604

13.C.

Page 268 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
28 / 67
Average Daily — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.01 < 0.005 5.47
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.91 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.17. Drainage/Utilities (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10T PM2.5T CO2e
Onsite — — — — — — —
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Average Daily — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — —
Offsite — — — — — — —
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Average Daily — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — —

3.18. Drainage/Utilities (2025) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10T PM2.5T CO2e
Onsite — — — — — — —
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — — Page 165 of 604

13.C.

Page 269 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
29 / 67
Off-Road Equipment 0.57 8.54 8.96 0.02 0.23 0.21 1,381
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Daily, Winter (Max)———————
Off-Road Equipment 0.57 8.54 8.96 0.02 0.23 0.21 1,381
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Average Daily———————
Off-Road Equipment 0.15 2.31 2.42 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 373 Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual———————
Off-Road Equipment 0.03 0.42 0.44 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 61.8 Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Offsite———————
Daily, Summer (Max)———————
Worker 0.11 0.11 1.93 0.00 0.33 0.08 358
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Daily, Winter (Max)———————
Worker 0.11 0.12 1.46 0.00 0.33 0.08 328
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Average Daily———————
Worker 0.03 0.04 0.42 0.00 0.09 0.02 89.8
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual———————
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.02 < 0.005 14.9
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Page 166 of 604

13.C.

Page 270 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
30 / 67

3.19. Drainage/Utilities (2026) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10T PM2.5T CO2e
Onsite — — — — — — —
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Average Daily — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — —
Offsite — — — — — — —
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Average Daily — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — —

3.20. Drainage/Utilities (2026) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10T PM2.5T CO2e
Onsite — — — — — — —
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Off-Road Equipment 0.57 8.53 8.95 0.02 0.23 0.21 1,381
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Off-Road Equipment 0.57 8.53 8.95 0.02 0.23 0.21 1,381
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Average Daily — — — — — — —
Off-Road Equipment 0.10 1.54 1.61 < 0.005 0.04 0.04 249 Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Page 167 of 604

13.C.

Page 271 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
31 / 67
Annual — — — — — — —
Off-Road Equipment 0.02 0.28 0.29 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 41.2 Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Offsite — — — — — — —
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Worker 0.11 0.10 1.80 0.00 0.33 0.08 350
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Worker 0.10 0.11 1.36 0.00 0.33 0.08 321
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Average Daily — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.26 0.00 0.06 0.01 58.6
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.00 0.01 < 0.005 9.70
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10T PM2.5T CO2e Page 168 of 604

13.C.

Page 272 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
32 / 67
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — —

4.1.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10T PM2.5T CO2e
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail

6.73 4.54 97.4 0.22 21.6 5.50 22,292
User Defined
Industrial

0.65 28.4 7.88 0.27 9.30 2.81 29,827
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 7.38 32.9 105 0.48 30.9 8.31 52,119
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail

6.45 5.04 78.7 0.20 21.6 5.50 20,537
User Defined
Industrial

0.63 29.6 7.93 0.27 9.30 2.81 29,758
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 7.08 34.6 86.6 0.47 30.9 8.31 50,295
Annual — — — — — — —
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail

0.86 0.69 10.9 0.03 2.86 0.73 2,521

Page 169 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 273 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
33 / 67
User Defined
Industrial

0.08 3.98 1.05 0.04 1.23 0.37 3,597
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.94 4.67 12.0 0.06 4.10 1.10 6,117

4.2. Energy

Page 170 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 274 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
34 / 67
Total — — — — — — 4,191
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
— — — — — — 3,885
User Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — 0.00
Parking Lot — — — — — — 307
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — 0.00
Total — — — — — — 4,191
Annual — — — — — — —
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
— — — — — — 643
User Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — 0.00
Parking Lot — — — — — — 50.8
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — 0.00
Total — — — — — — 694

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10T PM2.5T CO2e
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — Page 171 of 604

13.C.

Page 275 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
35 / 67

4.2.4. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10T PM2.5T CO2e
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
User Defined
Industrial

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
User Defined
Industrial

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual — — — — — — —
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
User Defined
Industrial

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Page 172 of 604

13.C.

Page 276 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
36 / 67

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Source ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10T PM2.5T CO2e
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Consumer Products 19.0 — — — — — —
Architectural Coatings 2.33 — — — — — —
Landscape Equipment 6.32 0.32 38.5 < 0.005 0.07 0.05 159 Total 27.7 0.32 38.5 < 0.005 0.07 0.05 159
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Consumer Products 19.0 — — — — — —
Architectural Coatings 2.33 — — — — — —
Total 21.3 — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — —
Consumer Products 3.47 — — — — — —
Architectural Coatings 0.43 — — — — — —
Landscape Equipment 0.79 0.04 4.81 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 18.0 Page 173 of 604

13.C.

Page 277 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
37 / 67
Total 4.69 0.04 4.81 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 18.0

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10T PM2.5T CO2e
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
— — — — — — 3,024
User Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — 0.00
Parking Lot — — — — — — 0.00
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — 0.00
Total — — — — — — 3,024
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
— — — — — — 3,024

Page 174 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 278 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
38 / 67
User Defined — — — — — — 0.00
Industrial
Parking Lot — — — — — — 0.00
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — 0.00
Total — — — — — — 3,024
Annual — — — — — — —
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
— — — — — — 501
User Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — 0.00
Parking Lot — — — — — — 0.00
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — 0.00
Total — — — — — — 501

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10T PM2.5T CO2e
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — —

4.5.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Page 175 of 604

13.C.

Page 279 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
39 / 67
Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10T PM2.5T CO2e
Daily, Summer (Max)———————
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
—————— 1,568
User Defined
Industrial
—————— 0.00
Parking Lot—————— 0.00
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
—————— 0.00
Total—————— 1,568
Daily, Winter (Max)———————
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
—————— 1,568
User Defined
Industrial
—————— 0.00
Parking Lot—————— 0.00
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
—————— 0.00
Total—————— 1,568
Annual———————
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
—————— 260
User Defined
Industrial
—————— 0.00
Parking Lot—————— 0.00
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
—————— 0.00
Total—————— 260

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated Page 176 of 604

13.C.

Page 280 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
40 / 67
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10T PM2.5T CO2e
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — —

4.6.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10T PM2.5T CO2e
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — —

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipment Type ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10T PM2.5T CO2e
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — Page 177 of 604

13.C.

Page 281 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
41 / 67
Annual — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — —

4.7.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipment Type ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10T PM2.5T CO2e
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — —

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipment Type ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10T PM2.5T CO2e Page 178 of 604

13.C.

Page 282 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
42 / 67
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Fire Pump 0.01 0.07 0.08 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 6.74
Total 0.01 0.07 0.08 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 6.74
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Fire Pump 0.01 0.07 0.08 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 6.74
Total 0.01 0.07 0.08 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 6.74
Annual — — — — — — —
Fire Pump < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.15 Total < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.15

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipment Type ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10T PM2.5T CO2e
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — —

4.9.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipment Type ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10T PM2.5T CO2e
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — — Page 179 of 604

13.C.

Page 283 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
43 / 67
Total — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — —

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Vegetation ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10T PM2.5T CO2e
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — —

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10T PM2.5T CO2e
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — —

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Page 180 of 604

13.C.

Page 284 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
44 / 67
Species ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10T PM2.5T CO2e
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — —
Sequestered — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — —
Removed — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — —
Sequestered — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — —
Removed — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — —
Sequestered — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — —
Removed — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — —

4.10.4. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Page 181 of 604

13.C.

Page 285 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
45 / 67
Vegetation ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10T PM2.5T CO2e
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — —

4.10.5. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10T PM2.5T CO2e
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — —

4.10.6. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Species ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10T PM2.5T CO2e
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — —
Sequestered — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — —
Removed — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — Page 182 of 604

13.C.

Page 286 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
46 / 67
— — — — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — —
Sequestered — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — —
Removed — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — —
Sequestered — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — —
Removed — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — —

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Days Per Week Work Days per Phase Phase Description Site Preparation Site Preparation 5/4/2025 5/25/2025 5.00 15.0 — Grading Grading 5/26/2025 8/1/2025 5.00 50.0 Building construction grading
Offsite Grading Grading 8/8/2025 8/15/2025 5.00 6.00 Offsite grading Building Construction Building Construction 8/2/2025 4/20/2026 5.00 186 — Paving Paving 4/3/2026 4/20/2026 5.00 12.0 — Page 183 of 604

13.C.

Page 287 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
47 / 67
Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 4/21/2026 6/4/2026 5.00 33.0 — Grubbing/Clearing Trenching 8/2/2025 8/7/2025 5.00 4.00 — Drainage/Utilities Trenching 8/16/2025 4/2/2026 5.00 164 —

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 367 0.40 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Average 0.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Site Preparation Crawler Tractors Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 87.0 0.43 Grading Excavators Diesel Average 4.00 8.00 36.0 0.38
Grading Graders Diesel Average 4.00 8.00 148 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 4.00 8.00 367 0.40 Grading Scrapers Diesel Average 4.00 8.00 423 0.48
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Average 0.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Grading Crawler Tractors Diesel Average 4.00 8.00 87.0 0.43 Offsite Grading Excavators Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 36.0 0.38 Offsite Grading Graders Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 148 0.41 Offsite Grading Scrapers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 423 0.48 Offsite Grading Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Average 4.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Offsite Grading Rollers Diesel Average 6.00 8.00 36.0 0.38 Offsite Grading Rubber Tired Loaders Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 150 0.36 Offsite Grading Signal Boards Diesel Average 8.00 8.00 6.00 0.82 Building Construction Cranes Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 367 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 82.0 0.20 Page 184 of 604

13.C.

Page 288 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
48 / 67
Building Construction Generator Sets Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 14.0 0.74 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Average 5.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Building Construction Welders Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 46.0 0.45 Paving Pavers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 81.0 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 89.0 0.36 Paving Rollers Diesel Average 4.00 8.00 36.0 0.38
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Average 4.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Paving Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 367 0.40 Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 37.0 0.48 Grubbing/Clearing Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 4.00 8.00 367 0.40 Grubbing/Clearing Crawler Tractors Diesel Average 4.00 8.00 87.0 0.43 Grubbing/Clearing Excavators Diesel Average 4.00 8.00 36.0 0.38 Grubbing/Clearing Signal Boards Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 6.00 0.82 Drainage/Utilities Air Compressors Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 37.0 0.48 Drainage/Utilities Generator Sets Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 14.0 0.74 Drainage/Utilities Plate Compactors Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 8.00 0.43 Drainage/Utilities Pumps Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 11.0 0.74 Drainage/Utilities Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 84.0 0.37

5.2.2. Mitigated
Phase Name Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Tier 4 Interim 3.00 8.00 367 0.40 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Average 0.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Site Preparation Crawler Tractors Diesel Tier 4 Interim 3.00 8.00 87.0 0.43 Grading Excavators Diesel Tier 4 Interim 4.00 8.00 36.0 0.38 Page 185 of 604

13.C.

Page 289 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
49 / 67
Grading Graders Diesel Tier 4 Interim 4.00 8.00 148 0.41 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Tier 4 Interim 4.00 8.00 367 0.40 Grading Scrapers Diesel Tier 4 Interim 4.00 8.00 423 0.48 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Average 0.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Grading Crawler Tractors Diesel Tier 4 Interim 4.00 8.00 87.0 0.43 Offsite Grading Excavators Diesel Tier 4 Interim 2.00 8.00 36.0 0.38 Offsite Grading Graders Diesel Tier 4 Interim 2.00 8.00 148 0.41 Offsite Grading Scrapers Diesel Tier 4 Interim 2.00 8.00 423 0.48 Offsite Grading Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Tier 4 Interim 4.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Offsite Grading Rollers Diesel Tier 4 Interim 6.00 8.00 36.0 0.38 Offsite Grading Rubber Tired Loaders Diesel Tier 4 Interim 3.00 8.00 150 0.36 Offsite Grading Signal Boards Diesel Average 8.00 8.00 6.00 0.82 Building Construction Cranes Diesel Tier 4 Interim 2.00 8.00 367 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts Diesel Tier 4 Interim 3.00 8.00 82.0 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 14.0 0.74 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Tier 4 Interim 5.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Building Construction Welders Diesel Tier 4 Interim 1.00 8.00 46.0 0.45 Paving Pavers Diesel Tier 4 Interim 2.00 8.00 81.0 0.42 Paving Paving Equipment Diesel Tier 4 Interim 2.00 8.00 89.0 0.36 Paving Rollers Diesel Tier 4 Interim 4.00 8.00 36.0 0.38 Paving Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Tier 4 Interim 4.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Paving Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Tier 4 Interim 2.00 8.00 367 0.40 Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel Tier 4 Interim 3.00 8.00 37.0 0.48 Grubbing/Clearing Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Tier 4 Interim 4.00 8.00 367 0.40 Grubbing/Clearing Crawler Tractors Diesel Tier 4 Interim 4.00 8.00 87.0 0.43 Grubbing/Clearing Excavators Diesel Tier 4 Interim 4.00 8.00 36.0 0.38 Page 186 of 604

13.C.

Page 290 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
50 / 67
Grubbing/Clearing Signal Boards Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 6.00 0.82 Drainage/Utilities Air Compressors Diesel Tier 4 Interim 2.00 8.00 37.0 0.48 Drainage/Utilities Generator Sets Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 14.0 0.74 Drainage/Utilities Plate Compactors Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 8.00 0.43 Drainage/Utilities Pumps Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 11.0 0.74 Drainage/Utilities Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Tier 4 Interim 2.00 8.00 84.0 0.37

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Trip Type One-Way Trips per Day Miles per Trip Vehicle Mix Site Preparation — — — —
Site Preparation Worker 13.0 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Site Preparation Vendor 7.00 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Site Preparation Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Site Preparation Onsite truck 0.00 — HHDT
Grading — — — —
Grading Worker 47.0 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Grading Vendor 20.0 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Grading Hauling 241 20.0 HHDT
Grading Onsite truck — — HHDT
Offsite Grading — — — —
Offsite Grading Worker 72.5 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Offsite Grading Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Offsite Grading Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Offsite Grading Onsite truck — — HHDT
Building Construction — — — —
Building Construction Worker 372 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Page 187 of 604

13.C.

Page 291 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
51 / 67
Building Construction Vendor 87.0 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Building Construction Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Building Construction Onsite truck—— HHDT
Paving————
Paving Worker 35.0 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Paving Vendor— 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Paving Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Paving Onsite truck—— HHDT
Architectural Coating————
Architectural Coating Worker 75.0 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Architectural Coating Vendor 28.0 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Architectural Coating Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Architectural Coating Onsite truck—— HHDT
Grubbing/Clearing————
Grubbing/Clearing Worker 37.5 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Grubbing/Clearing Vendor— 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Grubbing/Clearing Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Grubbing/Clearing Onsite truck—— HHDT
Drainage/Utilities————
Drainage/Utilities Worker 25.0 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Drainage/Utilities Vendor— 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Drainage/Utilities Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Drainage/Utilities Onsite truck—— HHDT

5.3.2. Mitigated
Phase Name Trip Type One-Way Trips per Day Miles per Trip Vehicle Mix Site Preparation————
Site Preparation Worker 13.0 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Page 188 of 604

13.C.

Page 292 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
52 / 67
Site Preparation Vendor 7.00 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Site Preparation Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Site Preparation Onsite truck 0.00— HHDT
Grading————
Grading Worker 47.0 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Grading Vendor 20.0 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Grading Hauling 241 20.0 HHDT
Grading Onsite truck—— HHDT
Offsite Grading————
Offsite Grading Worker 72.5 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Offsite Grading Vendor— 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Offsite Grading Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Offsite Grading Onsite truck—— HHDT
Building Construction————
Building Construction Worker 372 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Building Construction Vendor 87.0 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Building Construction Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Building Construction Onsite truck—— HHDT
Paving————
Paving Worker 35.0 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Paving Vendor— 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Paving Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Paving Onsite truck—— HHDT
Architectural Coating————
Architectural Coating Worker 75.0 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Architectural Coating Vendor 28.0 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Architectural Coating Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Architectural Coating Onsite truck—— HHDT

Page 189 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 293 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
53 / 67
Grubbing/Clearing — — — —
Grubbing/Clearing Worker 37.5 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Grubbing/Clearing Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Grubbing/Clearing Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Grubbing/Clearing Onsite truck — — HHDT
Drainage/Utilities — — — —
Drainage/Utilities Worker 25.0 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Drainage/Utilities Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Drainage/Utilities Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Drainage/Utilities Onsite truck — — HHDT

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies
Non-applicable. No control strategies activated by user.

5.5. Architectural Coatings
Phase Name Residential Interior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Residential Exterior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Interior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
Architectural Coating 0.00 0.00 1,327,140 442,380 61,116

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities
Phase Name Material Imported (cy) Material Exported (cy) Acres Graded (acres) Material Demolished (sq. ft.) Acres Paved (acres) Site Preparation — — 45.0 0.00 —
Grading 96,300 — 750 0.00 —
Offsite Grading — — 18.0 0.00 —
Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 24.5 Page 190 of 604

13.C.

Page 294 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
54 / 67

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies
Control Strategies Applied Frequency (per day) PM10 Reduction PM2.5 Reduction Water Exposed Area 3 74% 74%

5.7. Construction Paving
Land Use Area Paved (acres) % Asphalt
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 0.00 0%
User Defined Industrial 0.00 0%
Parking Lot 8.42 100%
Other Asphalt Surfaces 11.6 100%
Other Asphalt Surfaces 4.52 100%

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors kWh per Year and Emission Factor (lb/MWh)
Year kWh per Year CO2 CH4 N2O
2025 0.00 349 0.03 < 0.005
2026 0.00 346 0.03 < 0.005

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Year VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Year Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
1,549 133 53.1 413,591 30,837 2,642 1,057 8,232,368
User Defined
Industrial
335 26.5 8.85 89,269 10,154 804 268 2,703,113
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Page 191 of 604

13.C.

Page 295 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
55 / 67
Other Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

5.9.2. Mitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Year VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Year Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
1,549 133 53.1 413,591 30,837 2,642 1,057 8,232,368
User Defined
Industrial
335 26.5 8.85 89,269 10,154 804 268 2,703,113
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated

5.10.1.2. Mitigated

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings
Residential Interior Area Coated (sq
ft)
Residential Exterior Area Coated (sq
ft)
Non-Residential Interior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
0 0.00 1,327,140 442,380 64,070

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment Page 192 of 604

13.C.

Page 296 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
56 / 67
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Summer Days day/yr 250

5.10.4. Landscape Equipment - Mitigated
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Summer Days day/yr 250

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr) CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No
Rail
4,071,976 346 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
User Defined Industrial 0.00 346 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
Parking Lot 321,448 346 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 346 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 346 0.0330 0.0040 0.00

5.11.2. Mitigated
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr) CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No
Rail
4,071,976 346 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
User Defined Industrial 0.00 346 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
Parking Lot 321,448 346 0.0330 0.0040 0.00 Page 193 of 604

13.C.

Page 297 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
57 / 67
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 346 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 346 0.0330 0.0040 0.00

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year) Outdoor Water (gal/year) Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 204,600,750 2,710,455
User Defined Industrial 0.00 0.00
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00

5.12.2. Mitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year) Outdoor Water (gal/year) Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 204,600,750 2,710,455
User Defined Industrial 0.00 0.00
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year) Cogeneration (kWh/year)
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 832 —
User Defined Industrial 0.00 —
Parking Lot 0.00 — Page 194 of 604

13.C.

Page 298 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
58 / 67
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 —
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 —

5.13.2. Mitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year) Cogeneration (kWh/year)
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 832 —
User Defined Industrial 0.00 —
Parking Lot 0.00 —
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 —
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 —

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg) Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced

5.14.2. Mitigated
Land Use Type Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg) Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment

5.15.1. Unmitigated
Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor

5.15.2. Mitigated
Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor Page 195 of 604

13.C.

Page 299 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
59 / 67

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number per Day Hours per Day Hours per Year Horsepower Load Factor Fire Pump Diesel 1.00 1.00 50.0 8.00 0.73

5.16.2. Process Boilers
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number Boiler Rating (MMBtu/hr) Daily Heat Input (MMBtu/day) Annual Heat Input (MMBtu/yr)

5.17. User Defined
Equipment Type Fuel Type
— —

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1.2. Mitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres Page 196 of 604

13.C.

Page 300 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
60 / 67

5.18.1.2. Mitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year) Natural Gas Saved (btu/year)

5.18.2.2. Mitigated
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year) Natural Gas Saved (btu/year)

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary
Cal-Adapt midcentury 2040–2059 average projections for four hazards are reported below for your project location. These are under Representation Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 which assumes GHG emissions will continue to rise strongly through 2050 and then plateau around 2100.

Climate Hazard Result for Project Location Unit
Temperature and Extreme Heat 26.9 annual days of extreme heat Extreme Precipitation 2.50 annual days with precipitation above 20 mm Sea Level Rise — meters of inundation depth
Wildfire 16.8 annual hectares burned
Temperature and Extreme Heat data are for grid cell in which your project are located. The projection is based on the 98th historical percentile of daily maximum/minimum temperatures from observed historical data (32 climate model ensemble from Cal-Adapt, 2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

Extreme Precipitation data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The threshold of 20 mm is equivalent to about ¾ an inch of rain, which would be light to moderate rainfall if received over a full day or heavy rain if received over a period of 2 to 4 hours. Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

Sea Level Rise data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from Radke et al. (2017), as reported in Cal-Adapt (Radke et al., 2017, CEC-500-2017-008), and consider inundation location and depth for the San Francisco Bay, the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta and California coast resulting different increments of sea level rise coupled with extreme storm events. Users may select from four scenarios to view the range in potential inundation depth for the grid cell. The four scenarios are: No rise, 0.5 meter, 1.0 meter, 1.41 meters Page 197 of 604 13.C. Page 301 of 806 22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
61 / 67
Wildfire data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from UC Davis, as reported in Cal-Adapt (2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider historical data of climate, vegetation, population density, and large (> 400 ha) fire history. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential wildfire probabilities for the grid cell. The four simulations make different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature possibilities (MIROC5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat 3 0 0 N/A
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise 1 0 0 N/A
Wildfire 1 0 0 N/A
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality Degradation 0 0 0 N/A
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure.

The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest ability to adapt.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores do not include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

13.C.

Page 302 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
62 / 67
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores
The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state.

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Exposure Indicators —
AQ-Ozone 91.1
AQ-PM 45.7
AQ-DPM 14.4
Drinking Water 10.2
Lead Risk Housing 51.8
Pesticides 77.9
Toxic Releases 22.0
Traffic 32.2
Effect Indicators —
CleanUp Sites 0.00
Groundwater 14.3
Haz Waste Facilities/Generators 3.64
Impaired Water Bodies 0.00
Solid Waste 63.7
Sensitive Population —
Asthma 54.3 Page 199 of 604

13.C.

Page 303 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
63 / 67
Cardio-vascular 69.6
Low Birth Weights 24.6
Socioeconomic Factor Indicators —
Education 74.7
Housing 55.1
Linguistic 18.9
Poverty 87.8
Unemployment 89.2

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores
The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Economic —
Above Poverty 11.79263442
Employed 1.296034903
Median HI 9.80366996
Education —
Bachelor's or higher 8.520467086
High school enrollment 1.385859104
Preschool enrollment 84.46041319
Transportation —
Auto Access 18.88874631
Active commuting 21.86577698
Social —
2-parent households 44.52713974
Voting 32.45220069
Neighborhood —
Alcohol availability 74.06646991 Page 200 of 604

13.C.

Page 304 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
64 / 67
Park access 5.877069165
Retail density 4.69652252
Supermarket access 16.07853202
Tree canopy 1.539843449
Housing—
Homeownership 57.19235211
Housing habitability 34.65930964
Low-inc homeowner severe housing cost burden 30.9380213 Low-inc renter severe housing cost burden 15.57808289
Uncrowded housing 32.32388041
Health Outcomes—
Insured adults 12.17759528
Arthritis 0.0
Asthma ER Admissions 48.9
High Blood Pressure 0.0
Cancer (excluding skin) 0.0
Asthma 0.0
Coronary Heart Disease 0.0
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 0.0
Diagnosed Diabetes 0.0
Life Expectancy at Birth 7.0
Cognitively Disabled 10.7
Physically Disabled 6.2
Heart Attack ER Admissions 29.6
Mental Health Not Good 0.0
Chronic Kidney Disease 0.0
Obesity 0.0
Pedestrian Injuries 65.5 Page 201 of 604

13.C.

Page 305 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
65 / 67
Physical Health Not Good 0.0
Stroke 0.0
Health Risk Behaviors—
Binge Drinking 0.0
Current Smoker 0.0
No Leisure Time for Physical Activity 0.0
Climate Change Exposures—
Wildfire Risk 53.2
SLR Inundation Area 0.0
Children 28.6
Elderly 22.1
English Speaking 70.8
Foreign-born 28.9
Outdoor Workers 16.3
Climate Change Adaptive Capacity—
Impervious Surface Cover 88.9
Traffic Density 25.5
Traffic Access 23.0
Other Indices—
Hardship 89.6
Other Decision Support—
2016 Voting 37.9

13.C.

Page 306 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
66 / 67
Project Located in a Low-Income Community (Assembly Bill 1550) Yes Project Located in a Community Air Protection Program Community (Assembly Bill 617) No a: The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state. b: The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.

7.4. Health & Equity Measures
No Health & Equity Measures selected.

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard
Health & Equity Evaluation Scorecard not completed.

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures
No Health & Equity Custom Measures created.

8. User Changes to Default Data
Screen Justification
Land Use Adjusted lot acreage/building size per site plan.

Construction: Construction Phases Removed demolition phase since the site is vacant. Assumed the same construction schedule as the previously proposed Simpson project.

Construction: Off-Road Equipment Conservatively assumed all equipment would run for 8 hours/day. Replaced tractors/loaders/backhoes with crawler tractors during the site preparation and grading phases to accurately assess site disturbance. Proportionally reduced original Simpson equipment mix as follows: site preparation and grading were reduced based on the revised site acreage disturbance (62% of original); building construction, architectural coating were reduced based on the revised square footage (74%); paving was kept consistent since a decrease in building SF would result in increased grading. All equipment associated with offsite development was kept the same as the original model since the disturbance acreage would remain consistent.

Construction: Dust From Material Movement Assumed the same grading export as the previous Simpson project.

Construction: Trips and VMT SImilar to construction equipment mix, reduced construction trips as per revised site acreage and building SF percentage compared to the original Simpson project (62% of previous site disturbance, 74% of previous building square footage).

Operations: Vehicle Data Applied the same truck fleet mix as the previous Simpson study.

Operations: Fleet Mix Applied the same fleet mix as the previous Simpson study Operations: Off-Road Equipment Applied the same on-site cargo handling equipment as the previous Simpson study. Page 203 of 604

13.C.

Page 307 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
67 / 67
Operations: Energy Use No natural gas
Construction: Architectural Coatings Adjusted non residential coating to 50 g/L pursuant to SCAQMD Rule 1113, consistent with the Previous Study

Page 204 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 308 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson LST Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
1 / 42
22-030 Simpson LST Detailed Report
Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated

2.6. Operations Emissions by Sector, Mitigated

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated

4.1.2. Mitigated

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.2.2. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated

Page 205 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 309 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson LST Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
2 / 42

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.2.4. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.1. Unmitigated

4.3.2. Mitigated

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.1. Unmitigated

4.4.2. Mitigated

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.1. Unmitigated

4.5.2. Mitigated

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated

4.6.2. Mitigated

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated

4.7.2. Mitigated

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type Page 206 of 604

13.C.

Page 310 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson LST Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
3 / 42

4.8.1. Unmitigated

4.8.2. Mitigated

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated

4.9.2. Mitigated

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated

4.10.4. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Mitigated

4.10.5. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Mitigated

4.10.6. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Mitigated

5. Activity Data

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated

5.9.2. Mitigated

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

Page 207 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 311 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson LST Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
4 / 42

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated

5.10.1.2. Mitigated

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment

5.10.4. Landscape Equipment - Mitigated

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated

5.11.2. Mitigated

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated

5.12.2. Mitigated

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated

5.13.2. Mitigated

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated

5.14.2. Mitigated

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment Page 208 of 604

13.C.

Page 312 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson LST Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
5 / 42

5.15.1. Unmitigated

5.15.2. Mitigated

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps

5.16.2. Process Boilers

5.17. User Defined

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.1.2. Mitigated

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.1.2. Mitigated

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated

5.18.2.2. Mitigated

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary Page 209 of 604

13.C.

Page 313 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson LST Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
6 / 42

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores

7.4. Health & Equity Measures

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures

8. User Changes to Default Data Page 210 of 604

13.C.

Page 314 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson LST Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
7 / 42

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name 22-030 Simpson LST
Operational Year 2026
Lead Agency —
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 2.50
Precipitation (days) 8.60
Location 33.705441487178845, -117.0396340476545
County Riverside-South Coast
City Hemet
Air District South Coast AQMD
Air Basin South Coast
TAZ 5518
EDFZ 11
Electric Utility Southern California Edison
Gas Utility Southern California Gas
App Version 2022.1.1.29

Page 211 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 315 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson LST Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
8 / 42
User Defined 885 User Defined Unit 0.00 0.00 0.00 — — Trucks Industrial
Parking Lot 936 Space 8.42 0.00 0.00 — — —
Other Asphalt
Surfaces

11.6 Acre 11.6 0.00 0.00 — — —
Other Asphalt
Surfaces

4.52 Acre 4.52 0.00 0.00 — — Offsite
improvements

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector Sector # Measure Title
Construction C-5 Use Advanced Engine Tiers
Construction C-13 Use Low-VOC Paints for Construction

2. Emissions Summary

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10T PM2.5T CO2e
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Unmit. 32.6 8.06 65.8 0.08 4.95 1.36 16,875
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Unmit. 26.0 8.17 25.3 0.07 4.88 1.31 16,411
Average Daily (Max) — — — — — — —
Unmit. 29.1 6.13 45.3 0.05 3.59 0.98 14,495
Annual (Max) — — — — — — —
Unmit. 5.30 1.12 8.26 0.01 0.65 0.18 2,400
Exceeds (Daily Max) — — — — — — —
Threshold 55.0 55.0 550 150 150 55.0 —
Unmit. No No No No No No — Page 212 of 604

13.C.

Page 316 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson LST Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
9 / 42
Exceeds (Average
Daily)
— — — — — — —
Threshold 55.0 55.0 550 150 150 55.0 —
Unmit. No No No No No No —
Exceeds (Annual) — — — — — — —
Threshold — — — — — — 3,000
Unmit. — — — — — — No

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10T PM2.5T CO2e
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Mobile 4.95 7.67 27.2 0.07 4.87 1.30 7,925
Area 27.7 0.32 38.5 < 0.005 0.07 0.05 159
Energy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,191
Water — — — — — — 3,024
Waste — — — — — — 1,568
Stationary 0.01 0.07 0.08 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 6.74
Total 32.6 8.06 65.8 0.08 4.95 1.36 16,875
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Mobile 4.67 8.10 25.3 0.07 4.87 1.30 7,620
Area 21.3 — — — — — —
Energy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,191
Water — — — — — — 3,024
Waste — — — — — — 1,568
Stationary 0.01 0.07 0.08 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 6.74
Total 26.0 8.17 25.3 0.07 4.88 1.31 16,411
Average Daily — — — — — — — Page 213 of 604

13.C.

Page 317 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson LST Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
10 / 42
Mobile 3.39 5.90 18.9 0.05 3.54 0.94 5,601
Area 25.7 0.22 26.4 < 0.005 0.05 0.04 109
Energy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,191
Water — — — — — — 3,024
Waste — — — — — — 1,568
Stationary < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.92 Total 29.1 6.13 45.3 0.05 3.59 0.98 14,495
Annual — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.62 1.08 3.45 0.01 0.65 0.17 927
Area 4.69 0.04 4.81 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 18.0
Energy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 694
Water — — — — — — 501
Waste — — — — — — 260
Stationary < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.15 Total 5.30 1.12 8.26 0.01 0.65 0.18 2,400

2.6. Operations Emissions by Sector, Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10T PM2.5T CO2e
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Mobile 4.95 7.67 27.2 0.07 4.87 1.30 7,925
Area 27.7 0.32 38.5 < 0.005 0.07 0.05 159
Energy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,191
Water — — — — — — 3,024
Waste — — — — — — 1,568
Stationary 0.01 0.07 0.08 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 6.74
Total 32.6 8.06 65.8 0.08 4.95 1.36 16,875
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — — Page 214 of 604

13.C.

Page 318 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson LST Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
11 / 42
Mobile 4.67 8.10 25.3 0.07 4.87 1.30 7,620
Area 21.3——————
Energy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,191
Water—————— 3,024
Waste—————— 1,568
Stationary 0.01 0.07 0.08 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 6.74
Total 26.0 8.17 25.3 0.07 4.88 1.31 16,411
Average Daily———————
Mobile 3.39 5.90 18.9 0.05 3.54 0.94 5,601
Area 25.7 0.22 26.4 < 0.005 0.05 0.04 109
Energy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,191
Water—————— 3,024
Waste—————— 1,568
Stationary < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.92 Total 29.1 6.13 45.3 0.05 3.59 0.98 14,495
Annual———————
Mobile 0.62 1.08 3.45 0.01 0.65 0.17 927
Area 4.69 0.04 4.81 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 18.0
Energy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 694
Water—————— 501
Waste—————— 260
Stationary < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.15 Total 5.30 1.12 8.26 0.01 0.65 0.18 2,400

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use Page 215 of 604

13.C.

Page 319 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson LST Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
12 / 42

4.1.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10T PM2.5T CO2e
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail

4.70 1.47 24.1 0.04 3.80 0.97 4,157
User Defined
Industrial

0.25 6.20 3.09 0.03 1.07 0.32 3,769
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 4.95 7.67 27.2 0.07 4.87 1.30 7,925
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail

4.45 1.60 22.1 0.04 3.80 0.97 3,852
User Defined
Industrial

0.23 6.50 3.18 0.03 1.07 0.32 3,768
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 4.67 8.10 25.3 0.07 4.87 1.30 7,620
Annual — — — — — — —
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail

0.59 0.22 3.04 0.01 0.50 0.13 472
User Defined
Industrial

0.03 0.86 0.42 < 0.005 0.14 0.04 455
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.62 1.08 3.45 0.01 0.65 0.17 927 Page 216 of 604

13.C.

Page 320 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson LST Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
13 / 42

4.70 1.47 24.1 0.04 3.80 0.97 4,157
User Defined
Industrial

0.25 6.20 3.09 0.03 1.07 0.32 3,769
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 4.95 7.67 27.2 0.07 4.87 1.30 7,925
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail

4.45 1.60 22.1 0.04 3.80 0.97 3,852
User Defined
Industrial

0.23 6.50 3.18 0.03 1.07 0.32 3,768
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 4.67 8.10 25.3 0.07 4.87 1.30 7,620
Annual — — — — — — —
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail

0.59 0.22 3.04 0.01 0.50 0.13 472
User Defined
Industrial

0.03 0.86 0.42 < 0.005 0.14 0.04 455
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.62 1.08 3.45 0.01 0.65 0.17 927 Page 217 of 604

13.C.

Page 321 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson LST Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
14 / 42

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10T PM2.5T CO2e
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
— — — — — — 3,885
User Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — 0.00
Parking Lot — — — — — — 307
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — 0.00
Total — — — — — — 4,191
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
— — — — — — 3,885
User Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — 0.00
Parking Lot — — — — — — 307
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — 0.00
Total — — — — — — 4,191
Annual — — — — — — —
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
— — — — — — 643
User Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — 0.00
Parking Lot — — — — — — 50.8
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — 0.00

Page 218 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 322 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson LST Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
15 / 42
Total — — — — — — 694

4.2.2. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10T PM2.5T CO2e
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
— — — — — — 3,885
User Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — 0.00
Parking Lot — — — — — — 307
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — 0.00
Total — — — — — — 4,191
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
— — — — — — 3,885
User Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — 0.00
Parking Lot — — — — — — 307
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — 0.00
Total — — — — — — 4,191
Annual — — — — — — —
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
— — — — — — 643
User Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — 0.00
Parking Lot — — — — — — 50.8
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — 0.00

Page 219 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 323 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson LST Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
16 / 42
Total — — — — — — 694

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
User Defined
Industrial

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
User Defined
Industrial

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual — — — — — — —
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
User Defined
Industrial

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Page 220 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 324 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson LST Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
17 / 42
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
User Defined
Industrial

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
User Defined
Industrial

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Annual — — — — — — —
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
User Defined
Industrial

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Page 221 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 325 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson LST Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
18 / 42
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Source ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10T PM2.5T CO2e
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Consumer Products 19.0 — — — — — —
Architectural Coatings 2.33 — — — — — —
Landscape Equipment 6.32 0.32 38.5 < 0.005 0.07 0.05 159 Total 27.7 0.32 38.5 < 0.005 0.07 0.05 159
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Consumer Products 19.0 — — — — — —
Architectural Coatings 2.33 — — — — — —
Total 21.3 — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — —
Consumer Products 3.47 — — — — — —
Architectural Coatings 0.43 — — — — — —
Landscape Equipment 0.79 0.04 4.81 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 18.0 Total 4.69 0.04 4.81 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 18.0

13.C.

Page 326 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson LST Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
19 / 42
Landscape Equipment 6.32 0.32 38.5 < 0.005 0.07 0.05 159 Total 27.7 0.32 38.5 < 0.005 0.07 0.05 159
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Consumer Products 19.0 — — — — — —
Architectural Coatings 2.33 — — — — — —
Total 21.3 — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — —
Consumer Products 3.47 — — — — — —
Architectural Coatings 0.43 — — — — — —
Landscape Equipment 0.79 0.04 4.81 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 18.0 Total 4.69 0.04 4.81 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 18.0

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10T PM2.5T CO2e
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
— — — — — — 3,024
User Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — 0.00
Parking Lot — — — — — — 0.00
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — 0.00
Total — — — — — — 3,024
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
— — — — — — 3,024

Page 223 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 327 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson LST Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
20 / 42
User Defined — — — — — — 0.00
Industrial
Parking Lot — — — — — — 0.00
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — 0.00
Total — — — — — — 3,024
Annual — — — — — — —
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
— — — — — — 501
User Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — 0.00
Parking Lot — — — — — — 0.00
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — 0.00
Total — — — — — — 501

Page 224 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 328 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson LST Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
21 / 42
User Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — 0.00
Parking Lot — — — — — — 0.00
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — 0.00
Total — — — — — — 3,024
Annual — — — — — — —
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
— — — — — — 501
User Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — 0.00
Parking Lot — — — — — — 0.00
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — 0.00
Total — — — — — — 501

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10T PM2.5T CO2e
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
— — — — — — 1,568
User Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — 0.00
Parking Lot — — — — — — 0.00
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — 0.00
Total — — — — — — 1,568
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — — Page 225 of 604

13.C.

Page 329 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson LST Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
22 / 42
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
— — — — — — 1,568
User Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — 0.00
Parking Lot — — — — — — 0.00
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — 0.00
Total — — — — — — 1,568
Annual — — — — — — —
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
— — — — — — 260
User Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — 0.00
Parking Lot — — — — — — 0.00
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — 0.00
Total — — — — — — 260

4.5.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10T PM2.5T CO2e
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
— — — — — — 1,568
User Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — 0.00
Parking Lot — — — — — — 0.00
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — 0.00
Total — — — — — — 1,568
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — — Page 226 of 604

13.C.

Page 330 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson LST Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
23 / 42
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
— — — — — — 1,568
User Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — 0.00
Parking Lot — — — — — — 0.00
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — 0.00
Total — — — — — — 1,568
Annual — — — — — — —
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
— — — — — — 260
User Defined
Industrial
— — — — — — 0.00
Parking Lot — — — — — — 0.00
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — 0.00
Total — — — — — — 260

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10T PM2.5T CO2e
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — Page 227 of 604

13.C.

Page 331 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson LST Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
24 / 42

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

13.C.

Page 332 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson LST Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
25 / 42
Total — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — —

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipment Type ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10T PM2.5T CO2e
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Fire Pump 0.01 0.07 0.08 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 6.74
Total 0.01 0.07 0.08 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 6.74
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Fire Pump 0.01 0.07 0.08 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 6.74
Total 0.01 0.07 0.08 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 6.74
Annual — — — — — — —
Fire Pump < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.15 Total < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.15

4.8.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipment Type ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10T PM2.5T CO2e
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Fire Pump 0.01 0.07 0.08 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 6.74
Total 0.01 0.07 0.08 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 6.74
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Fire Pump 0.01 0.07 0.08 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 6.74
Total 0.01 0.07 0.08 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 6.74 Page 229 of 604

13.C.

Page 333 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson LST Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
26 / 42
Annual — — — — — — —
Fire Pump < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.15 Total < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.15

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type Page 230 of 604

13.C.

Page 334 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson LST Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
27 / 42

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Species ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10T PM2.5T CO2e
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — —
Sequestered — — — — — — — Page 231 of 604

13.C.

Page 335 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson LST Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
28 / 42
Subtotal — — — — — — —
Removed — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — —
Sequestered — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — —
Removed — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — —
Sequestered — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — —
Removed — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — —

4.10.4. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Vegetation ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10T PM2.5T CO2e
Daily, Summer (Max) — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — —
Daily, Winter (Max) — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — Page 232 of 604

13.C.

Page 336 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson LST Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
29 / 42
Annual — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — —

13.C.

Page 337 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson LST Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
30 / 42
Subtotal — — — — — — —
Removed — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — —
Sequestered — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — —
Removed — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — —

5. Activity Data

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Year VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Year Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
1,549 133 53.1 413,591 5,422 464 186 1,447,566
User Defined
Industrial
335 26.5 8.85 89,269 1,168 92.5 30.8 311,054
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Page 234 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 338 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson LST Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
31 / 42

5.9.2. Mitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Year VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Year Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
1,549 133 53.1 413,591 5,422 464 186 1,447,566
User Defined
Industrial
335 26.5 8.85 89,269 1,168 92.5 30.8 311,054
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated

5.10.1.2. Mitigated

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Summer Days day/yr 250 Page 235 of 604

13.C.

Page 339 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson LST Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
32 / 42

5.10.4. Landscape Equipment - Mitigated
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Summer Days day/yr 250

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption Page 236 of 604

13.C.

Page 340 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson LST Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
33 / 42

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year) Cogeneration (kWh/year)
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 832—
User Defined Industrial 0.00—
Parking Lot 0.00—
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00—
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00—

5.13.2. Mitigated Page 237 of 604

13.C.

Page 341 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson LST Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
34 / 42
Land Use Waste (ton/year) Cogeneration (kWh/year)
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 832 —
User Defined Industrial 0.00 —
Parking Lot 0.00 —
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 —
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 —

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg) Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced

5.14.2. Mitigated
Land Use Type Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg) Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment

5.15.1. Unmitigated
Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor

5.15.2. Mitigated
Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number per Day Hours per Day Hours per Year Horsepower Load Factor Page 238 of 604

13.C.

Page 342 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson LST Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
35 / 42
Fire Pump Diesel 1.00 1.00 50.0 8.00 0.73

5.16.2. Process Boilers
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number Boiler Rating (MMBtu/hr) Daily Heat Input (MMBtu/day) Annual Heat Input (MMBtu/yr)

5.17. User Defined
Equipment Type Fuel Type
— —

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1.2. Mitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1.2. Mitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres Page 239 of 604

13.C.

Page 343 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson LST Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
36 / 42

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year) Natural Gas Saved (btu/year)

5.18.2.2. Mitigated
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year) Natural Gas Saved (btu/year)

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

Sea Level Rise data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from Radke et al. (2017), as reported in Cal-Adapt (Radke et al., 2017, CEC-500-2017-008), and consider inundation location and depth for the San Francisco Bay, the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta and California coast resulting different increments of sea level rise coupled with extreme storm events. Users may select from four scenarios to view the range in potential inundation depth for the grid cell. The four scenarios are: No rise, 0.5 meter, 1.0 meter, 1.41 meters Wildfire data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from UC Davis, as reported in Cal-Adapt (2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider historical data of climate, vegetation, population density, and large (> 400 ha) fire history. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential wildfire probabilities for the grid cell. The four simulations make different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature possibilities (MIROC5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores Page 240 of 604

13.C.

Page 344 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson LST Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
37 / 42
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat 3 0 0 N/A
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise 1 0 0 N/A
Wildfire 1 0 0 N/A
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality Degradation 0 0 0 N/A
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure.

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat 3 1 1 3
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise 1 1 1 2
Wildfire 1 1 1 2
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality Degradation 1 1 1 2
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure.

13.C.

Page 345 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson LST Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
38 / 42
The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores
The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state.

13.C.

Page 346 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson LST Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
39 / 42
Education 74.7
Housing 55.1
Linguistic 18.9
Poverty 87.8
Unemployment 89.2

13.C.

Page 347 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson LST Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
40 / 42
Tree canopy 1.539843449
Housing—
Homeownership 57.19235211
Housing habitability 34.65930964
Low-inc homeowner severe housing cost burden 30.9380213 Low-inc renter severe housing cost burden 15.57808289
Uncrowded housing 32.32388041
Health Outcomes—
Insured adults 12.17759528
Arthritis 0.0
Asthma ER Admissions 48.9
High Blood Pressure 0.0
Cancer (excluding skin) 0.0
Asthma 0.0
Coronary Heart Disease 0.0
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 0.0
Diagnosed Diabetes 0.0
Life Expectancy at Birth 7.0
Cognitively Disabled 10.7
Physically Disabled 6.2
Heart Attack ER Admissions 29.6
Mental Health Not Good 0.0
Chronic Kidney Disease 0.0
Obesity 0.0
Pedestrian Injuries 65.5
Physical Health Not Good 0.0
Stroke 0.0
Health Risk Behaviors—

Page 244 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 348 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson LST Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
41 / 42
Binge Drinking 0.0
Current Smoker 0.0
No Leisure Time for Physical Activity 0.0
Climate Change Exposures —
Wildfire Risk 53.2
SLR Inundation Area 0.0
Children 28.6
Elderly 22.1
English Speaking 70.8
Foreign-born 28.9
Outdoor Workers 16.3
Climate Change Adaptive Capacity —
Impervious Surface Cover 88.9
Traffic Density 25.5
Traffic Access 23.0
Other Indices —
Hardship 89.6
Other Decision Support —
2016 Voting 37.9

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores
Metric Result for Project Census Tract
CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Score for Project Location (a) 48.0 Healthy Places Index Score for Project Location (b) 2.00 Project Located in a Designated Disadvantaged Community (Senate Bill 535) No Project Located in a Low-Income Community (Assembly Bill 1550) Yes Project Located in a Community Air Protection Program Community (Assembly Bill 617) No Page 245 of 604

13.C.

Page 349 of 806 ends

22-030 Simpson LST Detailed Report, 6/25/2025
42 / 42
a: The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state. b: The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.

7.4. Health & Equity Measures
No Health & Equity Measures selected.

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard
Health & Equity Evaluation Scorecard not completed.

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures
No Health & Equity Custom Measures created.

8. User Changes to Default Data
Screen Justification
Land Use Adjusted lot acreage/building size per site plan.

Construction: Construction Phases Removed demolition phase since the site is vacant. Assumed the same construction schedule as the previously proposed Simpson project.

Construction: Dust From Material Movement Assumed the same grading export as the previous Simpson project.

Operations: Vehicle Data To approximate localized operational mobile source emissions, trip lengths for each land use subtype were reduced proportionally. This reduced percentage was obtained by taking the proportion of Operational VMT to Localized VMT from the previous Simpson study (~17.5% for warehouse and ~11.5% for user defined industrial [trucks]).

Operations: Fleet Mix Applied the same fleet mix as the previous Simpson study Operations: Off-Road Equipment Applied the same on-site cargo handling equipment as the previous Simpson study.

Operations: Energy Use No natural gas Page 246 of 604

13.C.

Page 350 of 806 ends

NEWLAND CAPITAL

SIMPSON ROAD HEMET, CA
07/02/25
A24-2097

CONCEPTUAL DESIGN

Page 247 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 351 of 806 ends

73 DOCK HIGH DOORS
GATE
RAMP

DOMENIGONI PARKWAY

SIMPSON ROAD

WARREN ROAD

SECURED TRUCK COURT
RAMP

RAMP RAMP
BLDG 1
884,760 S.F.

GATE
OFFICE
3,000 S.F.

OFFICE
6,000 S.F.

CLEAR HEIGHT: 50'

SECURED TRUCK COURT
4 0
'
D
R
I
V
E
WAY
2 0
'
D
R
I
V
E
WAY
4 0
'
D
R
I
V
E
WAY
170'-3". 1452' 396'-9"
201' 185' -
4". 590'
192' -
6".
60' 60'
TYP.
58'
73 DOCK HIGH DOORS
60'
TYP.
60'
80'-7"

NOT A PART

CONCEPTUAL
SITE PLAN SCHEME 7 SITE PLAN HEMET, CA
3800 E. Coast Highway, Ste 6
Corona Del Mar, CA 92625
www.Herdman-ad.com
714.389.2800
[email protected] PROJECT
A SCALE:

CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN 1" = 80'
A24-2097

05.12.2025

NEWLAND CAPITAL GROUP - SIMPSON RD

DOMENIGONI PARKWAY

WARREN ROAD
RAMP
BLDG 1
84,760 S.F.

LEAR HEIGHT: 50'

SECURED TRUCK COURT
590'
192' -
6".
73 DOCK HIGH DOORS
60'
TYP.
60'
80'-7"

NOT A PART
C
S
3 C
w
7 i

PROJECT

NEWLAND CAPIT

NEWLAND CAPITAL

SIMPSON ROAD HEMET, CA
07/02/25
A24-2097

SITE PLAN

Page 248 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 352 of 806 ends

73 DOCK HIGH DOORS
GATE
RAMP

SIMPSON ROAD

SECURED TRUCK COURT
RAMP

RAMP RAMP
BLDG 1
884,760 S.F.

GATE
OFFICE
3,000 S.F.

OFFICE
6,000 S.F.

CLEAR HEIGHT: 50'

SECURED TRUCK COURT
4 0
'
D
R
I
V
E
WAY
2 0
'
D
R
I
V
E
WAY
4 0
'
D
R
I
V
E
WAY
170'-3". 1452' 396'-9"
201' 185' -
4". 590'
192' -
6".
60' 60'
TYP.
58'
73 DOCK HIGH DOORS
60'
TYP.
60'
80'-7"

CONCEPTU

SITE PL
SCHEME 8 SITE PLAN HEMET, CA
3800 E. Coast Highway
Corona Del Mar, CA
www.Herdman-ad
714.389.2
info@Herdman-ad

PROJECT
A SCALE:

CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN 1" = 80'
A
05 NEWLAND CAPITAL GROUP - SIMPSON RD

DOMENIGONI PARKWAY

WARREN ROAD
RAMP
BLDG 1
84,760 S.F.

LEAR HEIGHT: 50'

SECURED TRUCK COURT
590'
192' -
6".
73 DOCK HIGH DOORS
60'
TYP.
60'
80'-7"

NOT A PART
C
S
3 C
w
7 i

PROJECT

NEWLAND CAPIT

NEWLAND CAPITAL

SIMPSON ROAD HEMET, CA
07/02/25
A24-2097

SITE PLAN

Page 249 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 353 of 806 ends

NORTH
WEST
SOUTH
EAST

NEWLAND CAPITAL

SIMPSON ROAD HEMET, CA
07/02/25
A24-2097

ELEVATIONS

Page 250 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 354 of 806 ends

3 A210a
1 A210a
2 A210a
4 A210a
11 2727
22 A AP PB B
C CD D
E E
F F
H
H
J J
K K
L
L
M M
N N
33 44
55 6
6 7
7 88
99 1010
1111
1212
1313
1414
1515
1616
1717
1818
1919
2121
2222
2323
2424
2525
2626

WAREHOUSE
1,452'-0"
59'-0" 58'-0" 58'-0" 58'-0" 58'-0" 58'-0" 58'-0" 58'-0" 58'-0" 58'-0" 58'-0" 58'-0" 58'-0" 58'-0" 58'-0" 58'-0" 58'-0" 58'-0" 58'-0" 58'-0" 58'-0" 58'-0" 58'-0" 58'-0" 59'-0" 710'-0"
60'-0" 60'-0" 60'-0" 60'-0" 60'-0" 50'-0" 60'-0" 60'-0" 60'-0" 60'-0" 60'-0" 60'-0" FUTURE OFFICE FUTURE OFFICE FUTURE OFFICE 1 A300a
2 A300a

PROPOSED FUTURE OFFICE AREA

CONCRETE WALL
10 Edelman
Irvine, CA, 92618
P 949.660.9128

CIVIL ENGINEERING

BRANDING

BUILDING MEASUREMENT

ARCHITECTURE

PLANNING

INTERIORS
JOB NO.:DRAWN BY.:PA/PM:

SHEET
THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK.

CAUTION: IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 24"x36" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT C:\_Revit\0204_ARCH_pebrahimiP2THV.rvt
9/24/2024 6:39:12 PM
T . ANAN
N.K.

IRV21-0204-00
BUILDING 1 - FLOOR

PLAN NEWLAND SIMPSON
ROAD

HEMET, CA
A120a

DATE REMARKS
2022-11-04 PLANNING SUBMITTAL
SCALE: 1" = 60'-0" 1 BUILDING 1 - FLOOR PLAN N 0 30' 60' 100' 300' 1"=60' SEE SHEET A010 FOR GENERAL NOTES

WALL LEGENDLEGEND
KEYNOTES:

FUTURE OFFICE

Page 251 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 355 of 806 ends

Page 252 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 356 of 806 ends

NEWLAND CAPITAL

SIMPSON ROAD HEMET, CA
07/02/25
A24-2097

SOUTH VIEW

Page 253 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 357 of 806 ends

NEWLAND CAPITAL

SIMPSON ROAD HEMET, CA
06/27/25
A24-2097

SIMPSON & WARREN INTERSECTION

Page 254 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 358 of 806 ends

NEWLAND CAPITAL

SIMPSON ROAD HEMET, CA
07/02/25
A24-2097

CORNER VIEW

Page 255 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 359 of 806 ends

NEWLAND CAPITAL

SIMPSON ROAD HEMET, CA
07/02/25
A24-2097

CONCEPTUAL DESIGN

Page 256 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 360 of 806 ends

PORTION TO

BE VACATED

PORTION TO
BE VACATED CAUTION: IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 24"x36" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO T FOR AND ON BEHALF OF WARE MALCOMB SHEET PA / PM: JOB NO.: DESIGNED:

REMARKS DATE NO. Sheet of DATE: PLOT DATE:
10 edelman
irvine, ca 92618
p 949.660.9128
waremalcomb.com

LEADING DESIGN FOR COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE

NEWLAND SIMPSON
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 38800
35655 SIMPSON ROAD
CITY OF HEMET, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CA IRV22-0204 L. CORSBIE C. PATTERSON 07/27/23 6 7/3/25 AGENCY CONTACT LIST OWNER/DEVELOPER NEWLAND CAPITAL GROUP 200 SPECTRUM CENTER DRIVE, SUITE 300 IRVINE, CA 92618 (949) 214-4779 CONTACT: TY NEWLAND CIVIL ENGINEER WARE MALCOMB 10 EDELMAN IRVINE, CA 92618 (949) 660-9128 CONTACT: LUKE CORSBIE CITY OF HEMET COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 445 EAST FLORIDA AVENUE HEMET, CA 92543 (951) 765-2300 WATER & SEWER EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT 2270 TRUMBLE ROAD PERRIS, CA 92570 (951) 928-3777 ELECTRIC SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26100 MENIFEE ROAD MENIFEE, CA 92585 (800) 684-8123 GAS SOCALGAS CO. 280 EAST STETSON AVE HEMET, CA 92543 (800) 427-2200 TELEPHONE AT&T 2350 WEST FLORIDA AVE, NO 110 HEMET, CA 92545 (951) 658-9774 CABLE/INTERNET SPECTRUM 2887 WEST FLORIDA AVE HEMET, CA 92545 (888) 406-7063 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 38800 LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF HEMET, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 2 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF HEMET, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, LYING NORTHERLY AND NORTHWESTERLY OF THE NORTHERLY SIDELINE OF THE 500 FOOT WIDE STRIP OF LAND DESCRIBED IN GRANT DEED TO THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT, RECORDED OCTOBER 4, 1999 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 1999-441419 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. EXCEPT AND RESERVE TO THE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, A PUBLIC CORPORATION, ALL OIL, GAS, HYDROCARBON SUBSTANCES, AND MINERALS OF EVERY KIND AND CHARACTER BELOW THE SURFACE OF THE PROPERTY, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO DRILL INTO, THROUGH, ONTO, USE AND OCCUPY ALL PARTS OF THE PROPERTY LYING MORE THAN FIVE HUNDRED (500) FEET BELOW THE SURFACE THEREOF FOR ANY AND ALL PURPOSES INCIDENTAL TO THE EXPLORATION AND FOR PRODUCTION OF OIL, GAS, HYDROCARBON SUBSTANCES OR MINERALS FROM THE PROPERTY OR OTHER LANDS, BUT WITHOUT, HOWEVER, ANY RIGHT TO USE EITHER THE SURFACE OF THE PROPERTY OR ANY PORTION OF THE PROPERTY WITHIN FIVE HUNDRED (500) FEET OF THE SURFACE FOR ANY PURPOSES WHATSOEVER, IN ACCORDANCE WITH AND SUBJECT TO THE COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS SET FORTH IN GRANT DEED RECORDED 8-26-2021 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2021-0512512 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. APN NO. 465-140-042 AND 465-140-043 BASIS OF BEARINGS THE BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED UPON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983, CCS83, ZONE 6, (2017.75) IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE SECTIONS 8801-8819. IN THE CITY OF HEMET, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE ZONING REQUIREMENTS NOTE: INDICATED ZONING INFORMATION IS FROM THE CITY OF HEMET ZONING ORDINANCES IN EFFECT AS OF THE DATE OF THIS SURVEY. ZONING AND RESTRICTIONS SHOWN HEREON WERE OBTAINED BY A GENERAL REQUEST AT THE PUBLIC COUNTER OF THE ABOVE NAMED DEPARTMENT. NO REPRESENTATION IS MADE FOR THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF SAID THIRD PARTY INFORMATION. THIS FIRM IS NOT AN EXPERT IN THE REPRESENTATION OF COMPLEX ZONING ORDINANCES. COMPLIANCE IS BEYOND THE SCOPE OF THIS SURVEY. ANY USER OF SAID INFORMATION IS URGED TO CONTACT THE LOCAL AGENCY DIRECTLY. ZONE: B-P (BUSINESS PARK) MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACKS: FRONT: 20 FEET SETBACK ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL: 0 FEET SIDE: 0 FEET REAR: 0 FEET HEIGHT RESTRICTIONS: 55 FEET SITE INFORMATION SITE ADDRESS: 35655 SIMPSON ROAD HEMET, CA 92596 EXISTING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO: 465-140-042 & 465-140-043 PARCEL 1 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO: TBD PARCEL 2 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO: TBD PARCEL 3 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO: TBD GENERAL PLAN: MIXED USE (VARIES) ZONE: B-P (BUSINESS PARK) SCHOOL DISTRICT: HEMET UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT COUNTY SERVICE AREA: N/A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT: N/A PER ALTA AREA: GROSS - 74.876 AC. (3,261,613.55 SQ. FT.) NET - 71.243 AC. (3,103,348.06 SQ. FT.) FEMA FIRM MAP NO. 06065C2085G, PANEL 2085 OF 3805. DATED 08/28/08 ZONE X - AREAS OF 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD. AREAS OF 1% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD WITH AVERAGED DEPTHS OF LESS THAN 1FT OR WITH DRAINAGE AREAS LESS THAN 1 SQUARE MILE; AND AREAS PROTECTS BY LEVEES FROM 1% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD. EXISTING LAND USE: UNDEVELOPED / VACANT LAND PROPOSED LAND USE: INDUSTRIAL / WAREHOUSING (CONDITIONAL USE) EXISTING PARKING: UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY PROPOSED PARKING: 1,276 AUTO STALLS, 420 TRAILER STALLS EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA: 70,192.58 SF (1.61 AC) PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA: 2,660,905.84 SF (61.09 AC) BENCHMARK NGS BENCHMARK PID DX5332 NAVD 88 - ELEV 1472.99' THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA WARE MALCOMB DATE: JUNE 27, 2023 EASEMENT NOTES COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE, PREPARED BY FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE COMPANY, DATED 09/25/23. EXCEPTIONS: 1. NOTE #3 - AN EASEMENT FOR RIGHT OF WAY FOR ONE DITCH, FLUME OR OTHER AQUEDUCT ACROSS THE LANDS OF ANY OTHER OWNER LYING BETWEEN THE LANDS OF SAID OWNERS AND THE SAN JACINTO RIVER RECORDED IN BOOK 43, PAGE 161, OF DEEDS, OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY. IN FAVOR OF: EACH AND EVERY OWNER OF LANDS OF THE RANCHO JACINTO VIEJO. 2. NOTE #6 - AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC HIGHWAY AND PUBLIC UTILITY RECORDED NOVEMBER 18, 1941 IN BOOK 523, PAGE 231, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. IN FAVOR OF: COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE. (30FT-WIDE, PLOTTED HEREON) 3. NOTE #8 - EASEMENTS FOR ROADWAY FACILITIES RECORDED OCTOBER 27, 1999 AS INSTRUMENT NO 1999-472895, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. IN FAVOR OF: COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE. (100FT-WIDE, PLOTTED HEREON) 4. NOTE #9 - A CC&R RECORDED AUGUST 26, 2021 AS INSTRUMENT NO 2021-0512512, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. (BLANKET EASEMENT) CONTIGUOUS OWNERSHIP NOTE THE TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP FOR THIS PROPERTY INCLUDES THE ENTIRE CONTIGUOUS OWNERSHIP OF THE LAND DIVIDER. \\wma-arch.com\wm\IRV\21\0204\00\Civil\CAD\Sheets\Exhibits\IRV21-0204_Tentative Parcel Map.dwg 07/03/2025 CPATTERSON 1:1

TITLE SHEET
1 1

REGISTERED PROFES

SIONAL ENGINEER
ST

C I V I L
A TE
OF CA
LIFORNIA No. 72588
LUCAS
A. CORSB IE 07/03/2025 WARE MALCOMB assumes no responsibility for utility locations.

The utilities shown on this drawing have been plotted from the best available information. It is, however, the contractorsresponsibility to field verify the location of all utilities prior to the commencement of any construction. GEOTECHNICAL CONDITIONS PER THE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT PREPARED BY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL, INC. DATED MAY 2, 2022, RESEARCH OF AVAILABLE MAPS INDICATES THAT THE SUBJECT SITE IS NOT LOCATED WITHIN AN ALQUIST-PRIOLO EARTHQUAKE FAULT ZONE. IN ADDITION, A REVIEW OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY RCIT GIS WEBSITE INDICATES THAT THE SITE IS NOT LOCATED WITHIN A RIVERSIDE COUNTY FAULT ZONE. FURTHERMORE, SCG DID NOT IDENTIFY ANY EVIDENCE OF FAULTING DURING THE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION. THEREFORE, THE POSSIBILITY OF SIGNIFICANT FAULT RUPTURE ON THE SITE IS CONSIDERED TO BE LOW. THE POTENTIAL FOR OTHER GEOLOGIC HAZARDS SUCH AS SEISMICALLY INDUCED SETTLEMENT, LATERAL SPREADING, TSUNAMIS, INUNDATION, SEICHES, FLOODING, AND SUBSIDENCE AFFECTING THE SITE IS CONSIDERED LOW. ACCORDING TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL, INC.'S INVESTIGATION, THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE REGARDING LIQUEFACTION POTENTIAL ON SITE: "THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY GIS WEBSITE INDICATES THAT THE SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN A ZONE OF MODERATE TO HIGH LIQUEFACTION SUSCEPTIBILITY. BASED ON THIS MAPPING, THE SCOPE OF THIS INVESTIGATION INCLUDED ADDITIONAL SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION, LABORATORY TESTING, AND ENGINEERING ANAYLYSIS IN ORDER TO DETERMINE THE SITE-SPECIFIC LIQUEFACTION POTENTIAL." THE PROJECT DESIGN SHOULD FOLLOW THE RECOMMENDATIONS OUTLINED IN THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. RECOMMENDATIONS: SEISMIC: BASED ON OUR UNDERSTANDING OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, THE SEISMIC DESIGN PARAMETERS WERE CALCULATED ASSUMING THAT THE EXCEPTION IN SECTION 11.4.8 APPLIES TO THE PROPOSED STRUCTURES AT THIS SITE. HOWEVER, THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER SHOULD VERIFY THAT THIS EXCEPTION IS APPLICABLE TO THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE. CORROSION POTENTIAL: POLYETHYLENE PROTECTION IS EXPECTED TO BE REQUIRED FOR CAST IRON OR DUCTILE IRON PIPES. THE APPLICANT MAY WISH TO CONTACT A CORROSION ENGINEER TO PROVIDE A MORE THOROUGH EVALUATION. TREATMENT OF EXISTING SOILS (BUILDING PADS): SOME LOCALIZED AREAS OF DEEPER EXCAVATION MAY BE REQUIRED IF ANY ARTIFICIAL FILL OR LOOSE, POROUS, OR LOW DENSITY NATIVE SOILS ARE ENCOUNTERED AT THE BASE OF THE OVEREXCAVATION. SHEET INDEX 1 TITLE SHEET
2 OVERALL TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 38800 SIMPSON RD

WINCHESTER RD DOMENIGONI PKWY SITE
WARREN RD 94' PROPOSED AC PAVING 2.0% 20' 12' 32' 47' 15' WARREN ROAD PROPOSED TYPICAL SECTION (FULL WIDTH) CITY OF HEMET: SECONDARY SCALE: N.T.S EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER 10' 2.0% 47' 32' 15' 10' 12' 20' EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER

STREETSCAPE

ULTIMATE

RIGHT-OF-WAY

CENTERLINE

ULTIMATE

RIGHT-OF-WAY
STREETSCAPE 100' EXISTING AC PAVING 0.7% 37.44' 50' WARREN ROAD EXISTING TYPICAL SECTION SCALE: N.T.S

EXISTING

RIGHT-OF-WAY

CENTERLINE

EXISTING
RIGHT-OF-WAY 50' 12.56' 1.95' 48.05' 94' PROPOSED AC PAVING 17.49' SIMPSON ROAD PROPOSED TYPICAL SECTION - WEST OF WARREN ROAD (HALF WIDTH) CITY OF HEMET: SECONDARY SCALE: N.T.S 47' 32' 15' 12' 8' PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER

CENTERLINE

ULTIMATE
RIGHT-OF-WAY 60' EXISTING AC PAVING 0.4% 14.51' 30' SIMPSON ROAD EXISTING TYPICAL SECTION SCALE: N.T.S

EXISTING

RIGHT-OF-WAY

CENTERLINE

EXISTING
RIGHT-OF-WAY 30' 12.57' 2.0% 2.0%

EXISTING EDGE

OF PAVEMENT

EXISTING EDGE
OF PAVEMENT 0.3%
2:1 MAX
2:1 MAX
2:1 MAX
2:1 MAX
2:1 MAX 2:1 MAX
3 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 38800
4 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 38800
5 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 38800 14.51'

EXISTING EDGE

OF PAVEMENT

EXISTING
RIGHT-OF-WAY MAX 2.0%
FUTURE

ULTIMATE
RIGHT-OF-WAY 30' PROPOSED AC PAVING MATCH EX EOP AREA TO BE VACATED* RIGHT-OF-WAY TO BE DEDICATED EXISTING PROPERTY* PROPOSED PARCEL 1 GROSS NET PROPOSED PARCEL 2 PROPOSED PARCEL 3 3,261,613.55 SF (74.88 AC) - - - - - 1,935,243.80 SF (44.23 AC)
2,452.36 SF (0.06 AC) - 784,509.53 SF (18.01 AC)
1,464.45 SF (0.03 AC) - 352,816.46 SF (8.10 AC) PROPERTY AREA TABLE SIMPSON ROAD WARREN ROAD - 113,062.82 SF (2.60 AC) -- - *AREA TO BE VACATED ADDED BACK TO PARCEL AREAS--- 75,980.94 SF (1.74 AC) 3' 3' 66' PROPOSED AC PAVING 17.49' SIMPSON ROAD PROPOSED TYPICAL SECTION - EAST OF WARREN ROAD (HALF WIDTH) CITY OF HEMET: COLLECTOR SCALE: N.T.S 44' 22' 11' 12' 10' PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER

CENTERLINE

ULTIMATE
RIGHT-OF-WAY 2.0% 2.0%
2:1 MAX 2:1 MAX 14.51'

EXISTING EDGE

OF PAVEMENT

EXISTING
RIGHT-OF-WAY MAX 2.0%
FUTURE

ULTIMATE
RIGHT-OF-WAY 30' PROPOSED AC PAVING MATCH EX EOP 12'
6 SIMPSON & WARREN INTERSECTION PLAN

Page 257 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 361 of 806 ends

EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY 2 2
3 APN: 465-140-46 OWNER: METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT APN: 465-140-46 OWNER: METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT APN: 009-619-269 OWNER: HEMET 223, LLC APN: 465-130-019 OWNER: HO CHARLES Y APN: 465-130-005 OWNER: HO CHARLES Y APN: 465-140-15
OWNER: WALTON CALIF
APN: 465-140-32
OWNER: CITY OF HEMET LEVIE ROAD (DEDICATED PER PM 11761 & NOT ACCEPTED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS)

EL FUEGO ROAD
(DEDICATED PER PM 11761 & NOT ACCEPTED BY THE BOARD

OF SUPERVISORS)

SALT CREEK CHANNEL
(RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL & WATER
CONSERVATION DISTRICT) 44.00'

30.00'

60.00'
100.00'

30.00'

60.00'
500.00'
500.00'

30.00'

SALT CREEK CHANNEL
(RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD

CONTROL & WATER
CONSERVATION DISTRICT) PARCEL 3 - PORTION OF EXISTING ROADWAY FACILITIES EASEMENT TO BE VACATED 0.03 AC (1,464.45 SF)

94.00'

47.00'

47.00' 3.00'

3.00' PROPOSED PARCEL LINE PROPOSED PARCEL 1 44.23 AC (1,935,243.80 SF) PROPOSED PARCEL 2 18.01 AC (784,509.53 SF) PROPOSED PARCEL 3 8.10 AC (352,816.46 SF) 10 FT WIDE PRIVATE STORM DRAIN EASEMENT 1495 1495
1490 PROPOSED FIRE WATER PROPOSED DOMESTIC WATER PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED IRRIGATION WATER 221.34' 161.34' 161.34' 125.03' 192.54' 132.54'

74.90'
1492 1496
1496
1502 FFE = 1499.00
1492
1492
1493
1493
1494
1494 PARCEL 2 - PORTION OF EXISTING ROADWAY FACILITIES EASEMENT TO BE VACATED 0.06 AC (2,452.36 SF) SIMPSON RD - AREA TO BE DEDICATED BEYOND EXISTING ROADWAY FACILITIES EASEMENT 1.09 AC (47,277.52 SF) SIMPSON RD - AREA TO BE DEDICATED BEYOND EXISTING ROADWAY FACILITIES EASEMENT 1.09 AC (47,277.52 SF) WQ BASIN WARREN ROAD SIMPSON ROAD PROPOSED FIRE WATER N89°04'25"W 1,561.41' ∆=46°33'14" R=800.00' L=650.01' S44°22'02"W 2,161.65'
S00°02'43"W 2,138.02'
N89°04'25"W 1,024.66' S00°55'35"W 104.89' S45°37'39"E 658.18' ∆=3°41'30" R=2977.00' L=191.81' ∆=41°
49'03" R=1275.86' L=931.19'
N00°02'43"E 1,583.17'

17.00' ∆=0°56'31" R=2977.00' L=48.94' N89°04'25"W 531.92' N89°04'33"W 281.53' S83°46'39"W 112.40'

17.00' LIMITS OF EXISTING BRIDGE

MODEL MASTERS AIR PARK PROPOSED SCENIC HIGHWAY LANDSCAPE SETBACK

25.00' PROPOSED SCENIC HIGHWAY LANDSCAPE SETBACK

25.00' PROPOSED LANDSCAPE SETBACK

20.00' 20.00' PROPOSED ACCESS EASEMENT 15.00' PROPOSED LANDSCAPE SETBACK PROPOSED SCREENWALL

10.00' WARREN RD - AREA TO BE DEDICATED BEYOND EXISTING ROADWAY FACILITIES EASEMENT 0.03 AC (1,124.26 SF) S39°01'20"W 13.86' S00°55'35"W 45.82' ∆=11°29'17" R=817.00' L=163.81' ∆=9°45'05" R=173.71' L=29.56' ∆=13°21'00" R=135.00' L=31.46' ∆=29°25'35" R=753.00' L=386.73' S45°38'36"E 81.24' S89°04'25"E 1,004.00' S89°04'25"E 230.49' S00°55'35"W 45.39' ∆=46°33'14" R=847.00' L=688.20' S45°37'39"E 81.35' 102.00 47.00' 55.00'

49.50'

47.00'

33.00'

25.00' S86°36'20"E 58.06' S89°04'25"E 211.19' S44°04'25"E 14.14' S86°11'06"W 73.73' PROPOSED LANDSCAPE SETBACK

5.00'
1877.44' TO

CL POPLAR
AVE 2662.77±' TO CL CALIFORNIA AVE

58.00'

72.00'
1502 CAUTION: IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 24"x36" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO T FOR AND ON BEHALF OF WARE MALCOMB SHEET PA / PM: JOB NO.: DESIGNED:

REMARKS DATE NO. Sheet of DATE: PLOT DATE:
10 edelman
irvine, ca 92618
p 949.660.9128
waremalcomb.com

LEADING DESIGN FOR COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE

NEWLAND SIMPSON
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 38800
35655 SIMPSON ROAD
CITY OF HEMET, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CA IRV21-0204 L. CORSBIE C. PATTERSON 07/27/23 6 7/3/25

REGISTERED PROFES

SIONAL ENGINEER
ST

C I V I L
A TE
OF CA
LIFORNIA No. 72588
LUCAS
A. CORSB IE 07/03/2025
\\wma-arch.com\wm\IRV\21\0204\00\Civil\CAD\Sheets\Exhibits\IRV21-0204_Tentative Parcel Map.dwg 07/03/2025 CPATTERSON 1:1

OVERALL

PROPOSED PARCEL MAP
2 2
0 SCALE: 1" = 50 100 200 100' NOTES 1. SEE SHEET 1 FOR EASEMENT INFORMATION. 2. AREA DOES NOT INCLUDE R/W DEDICATIONS. LEGENDPARCEL LINE EASEMENT LINE EX CENTERLINE EX CONTOUR EX RECLAIMED WATER EX STORM DRAIN (1490) EX BLDG SURVEYOR NOTE: THE SURVEY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS MAP IS BASED ON THE ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF JEFFREY S. FARLESS, PLS 9115, DATED APRIL 11, 2022. AREA TO BE VACATED EX EDGE OF PAVEMENT EX FENCELINE (VARIOUS) EX OVERHEAD ELEC EX WATER MAIN AREA TO BE DEDICATED PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR 1490 PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR 1491 SLOPE 1.0% PROPOSED FIRE WATER PROPOSED SANIATARY SEWER PROPOSED STORM DRAIN OVERALL PARCEL LINE

Page 258 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 362 of 806 ends

EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY APN: 465-130-005 OWNER: HO CHARLES Y APN: 465-130-019 OWNER: HO CHARLES Y APN: 465-140-15
OWNER: WALTON CALIF SIMPSON ROAD
2 30.00'

60.00' 44.00' 44.00'

17.00' PROPOSED PARCEL LINE PROPOSED PARCEL 1 44.23 AC (1,935,243.80 SF) PROPOSED PARCEL 2 18.01 AC (784,509.53 SF) FFE = 1499.00 1490
1490
1491
1492
1493
1494
1495
1496
1497
1498
1499
1497
1498
1499
1494
1493
1492
1492 FFE = 1499.00SIMPSON RD - AREA TO BE DEDICATED BEYOND EXISTING ROADWAY FACILITIES EASEMENT 1.09 AC (47,277.52 SF)

EL FUEGO ROAD
(DEDICATED PER PM 11761 & NOT ACCEPTED BY

THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS)
N89°04'25"W 1,561.41' ∆=46°33'14" R=800.00' L=650.01'
S00°02'43"W 2,138.02'
N00°02'43"E 1,583.17' PROPSED STREETSCAPE SETBACK

25.00' PROPOSED LANDSCAPE SETBACK

20.00' PROPOSED LANDSCAPE SETBACK

20.00' 20.00' PROPOSED ACCESS EASEMENT PROPOSED LANDSCAPE SETBACK 15.00' S89°04'25"E 1,004.00' S89°04'25"E 230.49' S00°55'35"W 45.39' PROPOSED SCENIC HIGHWAY LANDSCAPE SETBACK S86°36'20"E 58.06' S89°04'25"E 211.19'

47.00'

47.00' REFER TO SIMPSON & WARREN INTERSECTION PLAN, SHEET 6, FOR LANE DIMENSIONS

49.50' PROPOSED PARCEL 2 18.01 AC (784,509.53 SF) S44°04'25"E 14.14' REFER TO SIMPSON & WARREN INTERSECTION PLAN, SHEET 6, FOR LANE DIMENSIONS PROPOSED SCREEN WALL CAUTION: IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 24"x36" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO T FOR AND ON BEHALF OF WARE MALCOMB SHEET PA / PM: JOB NO.: DESIGNED:

REMARKS DATE NO. Sheet of DATE: PLOT DATE:
10 edelman
irvine, ca 92618
p 949.660.9128
waremalcomb.com

LEADING DESIGN FOR COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE

NEWLAND SIMPSON
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 38800
35655 SIMPSON ROAD
CITY OF HEMET, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CA IRV21-0204 L. CORSBIE C. PATTERSON 07/27/23 6 7/3/25

REGISTERED PROFES

SIONAL ENGINEER
ST

C I V I L
A TE
OF CA
LIFORNIA No. 72588
LUCAS
A. CORSB IE 07/03/2025
\\wma-arch.com\wm\IRV\21\0204\00\Civil\CAD\Sheets\Exhibits\IRV21-0204_Tentative Parcel Map.dwg 07/03/2025 CPATTERSON 1:1

PROPOSED PARCEL MAP
3 3
0 SCALE: 1" = 30 60 120 60' NOTES 1. SEE SHEET 1 FOR EASEMENT INFORMATION. 2. AREA DOES NOT INCLUDE R/W DEDICATIONS. SURVEYOR NOTE: THE SURVEY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS MAP IS BASED ON THE ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF JEFFREY S. FARLESS, PLS 9115, DATED APRIL 11, 2022. KEY MAP SCALE: NTS SEE SHEET 5

MATCHLINE SEE SHEET
4 MATCHLINE LEGENDPARCEL LINE EASEMENT LINE EX CENTERLINE EX CONTOUR EX RECLAIMED WATER EX STORM DRAIN (1490) EX BLDG AREA TO BE VACATED EX EDGE OF PAVEMENT EX FENCELINE (VARIOUS) EX OVERHEAD ELEC EX WATER MAIN AREA TO BE DEDICATED PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR 1490 PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR 1491 SLOPE 1.0% PROPOSED FIRE WATER PROPOSED SANIATARY SEWER PROPOSED STORM DRAIN OVERALL PARCEL LINE

Page 259 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 363 of 806 ends

EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY APN: 465-140-15
OWNER: WALTON CALIF
APN: 465-140-32
OWNER: CITY OF HEMET

SALT CREEK CHANNEL
(RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL & WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT) APN: 465-140-46 OWNER: METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT

30.00' 44.00'
500.00' PROPOSED PARCEL LINE 10 FT WIDE PRIVATE STORM DRAIN EASEMENT 1495 1490
1490
1491
1492
1493
1494
1492
1492
1493
1493
1494
1494
1495
1494
1496 1497 1498
1495
1493
1494
1495 FFE = 1499.00 PROPOSED PARCEL 1 44.23 AC (1,935,243.80 SF) LEVIE ROAD (DEDICATED PER PM 11761 & NOT ACCEPTED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS) S00°02'43"W 2,138.02'
N00°02'43"E 1,583.17' 20.00' PROPOSED ACCESS EASEMENT 20.00' PROPOSED ACCESS EASEMENT PROPOSED LANDSCAPE SETBACK 15.00'

10.00' PROPOSED PARCEL 2 18.01 AC (784,509.53 SF)

EL FUEGO ROAD
(DEDICATED PER PM 11761 & NOT ACCEPTED BY

THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS)

MODEL MASTERS AIR PARK PROPOSED SCREEN WALL PROPOSED LANDSCAPE SETBACK

5.00' CAUTION: IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 24"x36" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO T FOR AND ON BEHALF OF WARE MALCOMB SHEET PA / PM: JOB NO.: DESIGNED:

REMARKS DATE NO. Sheet of DATE: PLOT DATE:
10 edelman
irvine, ca 92618
p 949.660.9128
waremalcomb.com

LEADING DESIGN FOR COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE

NEWLAND SIMPSON
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 38800
35655 SIMPSON ROAD
CITY OF HEMET, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CA IRV21-0204 L. CORSBIE C. PATTERSON 07/27/23 6 7/3/25

REGISTERED PROFES

SIONAL ENGINEER
ST

C I V I L
A TE
OF CA
LIFORNIA No. 72588
LUCAS
A. CORSB IE 07/03/2025
\\wma-arch.com\wm\IRV\21\0204\00\Civil\CAD\Sheets\Exhibits\IRV21-0204_Tentative Parcel Map.dwg 07/03/2025 CPATTERSON 1:1

PROPOSED PARCEL MAP
4 4
0 SCALE: 1" = 30 60 120 60' NOTES 1. SEE SHEET 1 FOR EASEMENT INFORMATION. 2. AREA DOES NOT INCLUDE R/W DEDICATIONS. SURVEYOR NOTE: THE SURVEY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS MAP IS BASED ON THE ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF JEFFREY S. FARLESS, PLS 9115, DATED APRIL 11, 2022. KEY MAP SCALE: NTS SEE SHEET 3 MATCHLINE LEGENDPARCEL LINE EASEMENT LINE EX CENTERLINE EX CONTOUR EX RECLAIMED WATER EX STORM DRAIN (1490) EX BLDG AREA TO BE VACATED EX EDGE OF PAVEMENT EX FENCELINE (VARIOUS) EX OVERHEAD ELEC EX WATER MAIN AREA TO BE DEDICATED PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR 1490 PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR 1491 SLOPE 1.0% PROPOSED FIRE WATER PROPOSED SANIATARY SEWER PROPOSED STORM DRAIN OVERALL PARCEL LINE

Page 260 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 364 of 806 ends

APN: 465-130-019 OWNER: HO CHARLES Y APN: 009-619-269 OWNER: HEMET 223, LCC SIMPSON ROAD

WARREN ROAD

SALT CREEK CHANNEL
(RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD

CONTROL & WATER
CONSERVATION DISTRICT) APN: 465-140-46 OWNER: METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT APN: 465-140-46 OWNER: METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT 2 30.00'
3 100.00'

60.00'
500.00' PARCEL 3 - PORTION OF EXISTING ROADWAY FACILITIES EASEMENT TO BE VACATED 0.03 AC (1,464.45 SF)

3.00'

3.00'94.00'

47.00'

47.00' SIMPSON RD - AREA TO BE DEDICATED BEYOND EXISTING ROADWAY FACILITIES EASEMENT 1.09 AC (47,277.52SF) PROPOSED PARCEL 2 18.01 AC (784,509.53 SF) PROPOSED PARCEL 3 8.10 AC (352,816.46 SF) 1499 PARCEL 2 PORTION OF EXISTING ROADWAY FACILITIES EASEMENT TO BE VACATED 0.06 AC (2,452.36 SF) WQ BASIN

17.00' 1496 1500
1515
1505
1501 ∆=46°33'14" R=800.00' L=650.01'
S44°22'02"W 2,161.65'
N89°04'25"W 1,024.66' S00°55'35"W 104.89' S45°37'39"E 658.18' ∆=3°41'30" R=2977.00' L=191.81' ∆=0°56'31" R=2977.00' L=48.94' N89°04'25"W 531.92' S83°46'39"W 112.40' N89°04'33"W 281.53' LIMITS OF EXISTING BRIDGE SCENIC HIGHWAY LANDSCAPE SETBACK

25.00' PROPOSED SCENIC HIGHWAY LANDSCAPE SETBACK

25.00' PROPSED STREETSCAPE SETBACK

25.00' PROPOSED LANDSCAPE SETBACK

20.00' S39°01'20"W 13.86' S00°55'35"W 45.82' ∆=11°29'17" R=817.00' L=163.81' ∆=9°45'05" R=173.71' L=29.56' ∆=13°21'00" R=135.00' L=31.46' ∆=29°25'35" R=753.00' L=386.73' S45°38'36"E 81.24' S89°04'25"E 230.49' S00°55'35"W 45.39' ∆=46°33'14" R=847.00' L=688.20' S45°37'39"E 81.35' PROPOSED SCENIC HIGHWAY LANDSCAPE SETBACK PROPSED STREETSCAPE SETBACK WARREN RD - AREA TO BE DEDICATED BEYOND EXISTING ROADWAY FACILITIES EASEMENT 0.03 AC (1,124.26 SF) REFER TO SIMPSON & WARREN INTERSECTION PLAN, SHEET 6, FOR LANE DIMENSIONS

49.50' PROPOSED PARCEL 2 18.01 AC (784,509.53 SF) S44°04'25"E 14.14' PROPSED STREETSCAPE SETBACK

25.00'

47.00'

33.00' REFER TO SIMPSON & WARREN INTERSECTION PLAN, SHEET 6, FOR LANE DIMENSIONS REFER TO SIMPSON & WARREN INTERSECTION PLAN, SHEET 6, FOR LANE DIMENSIONS 47.00' 55.00' CAUTION: IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 24"x36" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO T FOR AND ON BEHALF OF WARE MALCOMB SHEET PA / PM: JOB NO.: DESIGNED:

REMARKS DATE NO. Sheet of DATE: PLOT DATE:
10 edelman
irvine, ca 92618
p 949.660.9128
waremalcomb.com

LEADING DESIGN FOR COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE

NEWLAND SIMPSON
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 38800
35655 SIMPSON ROAD
CITY OF HEMET, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CA IRV21-0204 L. CORSBIE C. PATTERSON 07/27/23 6 7/3/25
0 SCALE: 1" = 30 60 120 60' NOTES 1. SEE SHEET 1 FOR EASEMENT INFORMATION. 2. AREA DOES NOT INCLUDE R/W DEDICATIONS.

REGISTERED PROFES

SIONAL ENGINEER
ST

C I V I L
A TE
OF CA
LIFORNIA No. 72588
LUCAS
A. CORSB IE 07/03/2025
\\wma-arch.com\wm\IRV\21\0204\00\Civil\CAD\Sheets\Exhibits\IRV21-0204_Tentative Parcel Map.dwg 07/03/2025 CPATTERSON 1:1

PROPOSED PARCEL MAP
5 5 SURVEYOR NOTE: THE SURVEY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS MAP IS BASED ON THE ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF JEFFREY S. FARLESS, PLS 9115, DATED APRIL 11, 2022. KEY MAP SCALE: NTS SEE SHEET 3
MATCHLINE LEGENDPARCEL LINE EASEMENT LINE EX CENTERLINE EX CONTOUR EX RECLAIMED WATER EX STORM DRAIN (1490) EX BLDG AREA TO BE VACATED EX EDGE OF PAVEMENT EX FENCELINE (VARIOUS) EX OVERHEAD ELEC EX WATER MAIN AREA TO BE DEDICATED PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR 1490 PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR 1491 SLOPE 1.0% PROPOSED FIRE WATER PROPOSED SANIATARY SEWER PROPOSED STORM DRAIN PROPERTY LINE

Page 261 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 365 of 806 ends

12.00' 12.00' 12.00' 12.00' 12.00' 12.00' 32.00' 40.00 15.00' 15.00' 102.00'

12.00'

10.00'

11.00'

12.00'

49.50' 49.50'

15.00' ULTIMATE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE ULTIMATE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE

8.00'

12.00'

8.00'

15.00' 30.00' 44.00' SIMPSON ROAD

WARREN ROAD FUTURE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE

47.00' 59.00' FUTURE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE

15.00'

34.50' 34.50' CAUTION: IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 24"x36" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO T FOR AND ON BEHALF OF WARE MALCOMB SHEET PA / PM: JOB NO.: DESIGNED:

REMARKS DATE NO. Sheet of DATE: PLOT DATE:
10 edelman
irvine, ca 92618
p 949.660.9128
waremalcomb.com

LEADING DESIGN FOR COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE

NEWLAND SIMPSON
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 38800
35655 SIMPSON ROAD
CITY OF HEMET, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CA IRV21-0204 L. CORSBIE C. PATTERSON 07/27/23 6 7/3/25
0 SCALE: 1" = 15 30 60 30' NOTES 1. SEE SHEET 1 FOR EASEMENT INFORMATION. 2. AREA DOES NOT INCLUDE R/W DEDICATIONS.

REGISTERED PROFES

SIONAL ENGINEER
ST

C I V I L
A TE
OF CA
LIFORNIA No. 72588
LUCAS
A. CORSB IE 07/03/2025
\\wma-arch.com\wm\IRV\21\0204\00\Civil\CAD\Sheets\Exhibits\IRV21-0204_Tentative Parcel Map.dwg 07/03/2025 CPATTERSON 1:1

SIMPSON & WARREN INTERSECTION PLAN
6 6 SURVEYOR NOTE: THE SURVEY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS MAP IS BASED ON THE ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF JEFFREY S. FARLESS, PLS 9115, DATED APRIL 11, 2022. LEGENDPARCEL LINE EASEMENT LINE EX CENTERLINE EX BLDG EX EDGE OF PAVEMENT EX FENCELINE (VARIOUS) PROPERTY LINE

Page 262 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 366 of 806 ends

S89°04'25"E 372.62'
N00°02'43"E 1,583.17' EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY SD SD SD SD SDSD SD SD SD SD SDSD SD SD PROPOSED BUILDING 1
FFE = 1499.00

SIMPSON ROAD
WARREN ROAD SECTION D-D REFER TO SHEET 14 & 15

SECTION A-A
REFER TO SHEET 11

SECTION B-B
REFER TO SHEET 12

SECTION C-C
REFER TO SHEET 13 EX 100FT ROADWAY FACILITIES EASEMENT PROPOSED INFILTRATION BASIN D1 BOTTOM = 1496.00 PROPOSED UNDERGROUND INFILTRATION BASIN B3 PROPOSED UNDERGROUND INFILTRATION BASIN A1 EX 100FT ROADWAY FACILITIES EASEMENT EX 60FT WIDE PUBLIC HIGHWAY AND UTILITY EASEMENT PROPOSED 47FT HALF-WIDTH ULTIMATE RIGHT-OF-WAY PROPOSED 20FT WIDE LANDSCAPE SETBACK PROPOSED 20FT WIDE LANDSCAPE SETBACK PROPOSED 47FT WIDE ULTIMATE RIGHT-OF-WAY EX 60FT WIDE PUBLIC HIGHWAY AND UTILITY EASEMENT EX EMWD EASEMENT PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE ∆=14°45'19" R=135.00' L=34.77' ∆=29°25'35" R=753.00' L=386.73' S45°38'46"E 81.16' S45°37'39"E 81.35' ∆=46°33'14" R=847.00' L=688.20' S00°55'35"W 45.39'

32.00'

47.00'

30.00'
N00°02'43"E 2,138.02' S86°11'06"W 73.73' ∆=41°49'03" R=1275.86' L=931.19' S44°22'02"W 2,161.65' ∆=3°41'30" R=2977.00' L=191.81' 47' 25FT WIDE LANDSCAPE SETBACK 25FT WIDE STREETSCAPE PROPOSED 94FT ULTIMATE RIGHT-OF-WAY S44°04'25"E 14.14' N39°35'11"E 16.01' S89°04'25"E 996.48' 25FT WIDE LANDSCAPE SETBACK PROPOSED 25FT WIDE STREETSCAPE

SALT CREEK CHANNEL
(RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL & WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT) 500.00' EX WARREN RD BRIDGE 230.00' TRASH ENCLOSURE TRASH ENCLOSURE TRASH ENCLOSURE TRASH ENCLOSURE PROPOSED 15FT WIDE LANDSCAPE SETBACK PROPOSED 20FT WIDE LANDSCAPE SETBACK PROPOSED 5FT WIDE LANDSCAPE SETBACK PROPOSED 5FT WIDE LANDSCAPE SETBACK EX EDGE OF PAVEMENT EX EDGE OF PAVEMENT PROPOSED SIGHT TRIANGLE PROPOSED TEMPORARY LANE STRIPING UNTIL BRIDGE IS WIDENED PROPOSED 124.07' TAPER (8.1:1) EL FUEGO RD 20.00' S89°04'25"E 1,024.66' 5.00' PROPOSED SIGHT TRIANGLE S89°04'33"E 280.08' N83°46'39"E 112.40'

47.00'

32.00' 5.00' 44'

30.00' LEVIE RD PROPOSED 10 FT WIDE PRIVATE STORM DRAIN EASEMENT PROPOSED LEVEL SPREADER EMERGENCY OVERFLOW 15-16 D 12A 13B 14C 15-16 D 13B 12A ∆=0°56'31" R=2977.00' L=48.94' PROPOSED 25FT WIDE LANDSCAPE SETBACK PROPOSED 25FT WIDE LANDSCAPE SETBACK PROPOSED 33FT HALF-WIDTH ULTIMATE RIGHT-OF-WAY PROPOSED 47FT HALF-WIDTH ULTIMATE RIGHT-OF-WAY 14C S89°04'25"E 1,215.18'

94.00' S89°04'25"E 531.92' PROPOSED 20FT WIDE ACCESS EASEMENT

47.00' CAUTION: IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 24"x36" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO T FOR AND ON BEHALF OF WARE MALCOMB SHEET PA / PM: JOB NO.: DESIGNED:

REMARKS DATE NO. Sheet of DATE: PLOT DATE:
10 edelman
irvine, ca 92618
p 949.660.9128
waremalcomb.com

LEADING DESIGN FOR COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE

NEWLAND SIMPSON
35655 SIMPSON RD
HEMET, CA 92596 IRV21-0204 L. CORSBIE C. PATTERSON 07/11/2022 26 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION07/02/25
0 SCALE: 1" = 50 100 200 100' WARE MALCOMB assumes no responsibility for utility locations. The utilities shown on this drawing have been plotted from the best available information. It is, however, the contractors responsibility to field verify the location of all utilities prior to the commencement of any construction. SITE LEGENDFLOWPATH FFE FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION CONCRETE SIDEWALK \\wma-arch.com\wm\IRV\21\0204\00\Civil\CAD\Sheets\Preliminary\IRV21-0204_Preliminary Grading Plan.dwg 07/DD/25 12:35 PM CPATTERSON 1:1

PRELIMINARY OVERALL
SITE PLAN 0101 EARTHWORK QUANTITY ESTIMATE CUT (CY) FILL (CY) NET (CY) RAW* 65,700 207,400 141,700 (IMPORT) ADJUSTED** -- TOPSOIL REMOVAL (6IN)** - 56,300 - -- BUILDING SLAB (6IN)*** 22,000 - - -- AVG PAVEMENT (12IN)*** 50,800 - - -- UNDERGROUND INFILTRATION BASINS (4 TOTAL)**** 28,900 - - ADJUSTED + RAW 167,400 263,700 - TOTAL WITH ADJUSTED 167,400 263,700 96,300 (IMPORT) TOTAL DISTURBED AREA (AC) = 75 AC NOTE: THE ESTIMATED QUANTITIES HEREON ARE ONLY FOR THE PURPOSE OF OBTAINING THE NECESSARY PERMITS DUE TO THE VARIATION IN SHRINKAGE, SUBSIDENCE, OVEREXCAVATION, OR OTHER SPECIAL CONDITIONS THAT MAY AFFECT THESE QUANTITIES. WARE MALCOMB DOES NOT GUARANTEE THE ACCURACY OF THE ESTIMATED QUANTITIES. THE CONTRACTOR BIDDING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL PERFORM THEIR OWN QUANTITY TAKEOFF BEFORE SUBMITTING A BID FOR ANY PORTION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS COVERED BY THESE PLANS. *RAW CALCULATED BASED ON AN APPROXIMATE COMPARISON BETWEEN EXISTING AND FINISHED GRADE ONLY. THE QUANTITIES CALCULATED DO NOT INCLUDE OVEREXCAVATION REQUIRED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER, UTILITY TRENCH SPOILS, SHRINKING AND SWELLING OF DISTURBED NATIVE SOILS, PAVING SECTIONS, OR BUILDING AND RETAINING WALL FOUNDATIONS. **ADJUSTED CALCULATED BASED ON ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION EXCAVATION. LOWERING THE EXISTING GRADE BY 6IN TO ACCOUNT FOR TOPSOIL REMOVAL FROM SITE. LOWERING FINISHED GRADE FOR THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT BY 6IN FOR THE BUILDING SLAB, AND LOWERING FINISHED GRADE FOR THE PAVEMENT SECTIONS BY AN AVERAGE 12IN FOR THE PROPOSED PAVEMENT (CONCRETE & ASPHALT) AREAS. *** THICKNESS BASED ON DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS STATED IN THE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT BY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL, DATED 2022-05-02. **** DEPTH OF EACH BASIN BASED ON CROSS SECTION PROVIDED BY ADS, REFER TO WQMP DETAIL SHEETS. SHEET INDEX 01 PRELIMINARY OVERALL SITE PLAN 02 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN 03 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN 04 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN 05 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN 06 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN 07 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN 08 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN 09 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN 10 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN 11 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN 12 PRELIMINARY SITE SECTION 13 PRELIMINARY SITE SECTION 14 PRELIMINARY SITE SECTION 15 PRELIMINARY SITE SECTION 16 PRELIMINARY SITE SECTION 17 PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN 18 PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN 19 PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN 20 WQMP PLAN 21 WQMP DETAILS 22 WQMP DETAILS 23 WQMP DETAILS 24 WQMP DETAILS 25 WQMP DETAILS 26 WQMP DETAILS BENCHMARK: NGS BENCHMARK PID DX5332 NAVD 88 - ELEV 1472.99' 23

Page 263 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 367 of 806 ends

EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY S89°04'25"E 1,215.18' (1495)
(1494)
(1497)
(1497)
(1498)
(1498)
(1498)
(1498)
(1498)
(1499)
(1499)
(1499)
(1495)
(1494)
(1496) (1496)
(1496)
(1497) SIMPSON ROAD PROPOSED BUILDING 1 FFE = 1499.00 LIMIT OF PROPOSED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS. REFER TO SITE SECTIONS FOR APPROX TIE IN TO EXISTING GRADE DESIGN.

N00°02'43"E 2,138.02'

LANDSCAPE SETBACK

ULTIMATE RIGHT-OF-WAY
47'
30' 20'
47' 0.3% 0.3% 1496.96 TC 1496.46 FS 1498.54 TC 1498.04 FS 1500.02 TC 1499.52 FS 1497.94 TC 1497.44 FS 1497.49 TC 1496.99 FS 1496.54 TC 1496.04 FS 1494.42 TC 1493.92 FS 1495.50 TC 1495.00 FS 1495.00 FL 1496.95 TC 1496.45 FS

1.9%

1.6%

1.9%

1.3%

1.5%

1.3%

2.0%

2.4%

1.5% 1.0%

1.6%

1.9%

1.6% 1497.40 FS 1498.62 FS 1499.05 FS 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% (1497.22) FS (1498.33) FS 1496.77 FL 1497.98 FL 1499.09 TC 1498.42 FL

2.0%

1.7%

2.0%

3.3%

4.7%

4.3%

3.1%

0.3% 1496.08 FL 1497.16 FL 1497.24 FL

1.9%
(1497.08) FS
(1496.77) FS
(1496.69) FS 1494.40 FS-GB 1499.23 TC 1498.57 FL 1498.68 TC 1498.18 FS 1497.28 TC 1496.78 FS 1498.00 TC 1497.50 FS 1498.48 TC 1497.98 FS 1498.14 TC 1497.47 FL 1497.39 TC 1496.73 FL 1.2%

1.4% 1499.00 DOOR 1492.68 TC 1492.18 FL 1499.00 DOOR 1495.00 FS 996.48' 40.00'

26.00' 26.00' 20.00'

26.00'

6.00' EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT 55.00' 70.00' 60.00' 40.00'

6.67'

26.00' EXISTING PROPERTY LINE MONUMENTATION (TYP.)
LANDSCAPE SETBACK 20.00'
32' EX PUBLIC & UTILITY EASEMENT 01 02 02 02 03 03 03 03 02 02 02 02 02 05 05 04 080808 01 05 06 10 10 11 13 06 14 14 19 (1496.55) FS (1495.34) FS (1495.14) FS 1499.28 FS 20 15.00' PROPOSED ACCESS EASEMENT 1498.44 FS 1498.62 FS 1497.54 FS 1497.35 FL

7.4%

2.0%
MAX

2.7% WALKWAY 2.0% MAX WALKWAY 2.0% MAX 1499.69 HP 1497.62 FL 1.0% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5%

1.9%

1.2%

2.0%

2.0% 1498.11 FS (1497.91) FS

2.0% 0.3% LANE STRIPING (TYP) LANE STRIPING (TYP)
(TYP) 21 (TYP) 21 (TYP) 21 (TYP) 21 (TYP) 21 (TYP) 21 (TYP) 21 (TYP) 21(TYP) 21 2.0% MAX2.0% MAX 1,004.00' (TYP) 22 (TYP) 22 (TYP) 22 (TYP) 22 PROVIDE 10:1 TRANSITION BACK TO EXISTING BEYOND PROPERTY LINE CAUTION: IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 24"x36" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO T FOR AND ON BEHALF OF WARE MALCOMB SHEET PA / PM: JOB NO.: DESIGNED:

REMARKS DATE NO. Sheet of DATE: PLOT DATE:
10 edelman
irvine, ca 92618
p 949.660.9128
waremalcomb.com

LEADING DESIGN FOR COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE

SEE SHEET 03
MATCHLINE SEE SHEET 06 MATCHLINE GRADING PLAN CONSTRUCTION NOTES CONSTRUCT 6" CURB AND GUTTER, TYPE "A", PER CITY STD. NO. C-200 CONSTRUCT 6" CURB, TYPE "D", PER CITY STD. NO. C-203 CONSTRUCT 4' WIDE VALLEY GUTTER PER CITY STD. NO. C-213 CONSTRUCT HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS. CONSTRUCT LIGHT DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS. CONSTRUCT COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY PER CITY STD. NO. C-210A INFILTRATION BASIN. REFER TO UTLITY PLANS. STAIRS/STEPS PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AC BERM TRANSITION BACK TO EXISTING. ADA PATH OF TRAVEL. SHALL MEET THE CURRENT ADA STANDARDS. BOLLARD CATCH BASIN INLET. REFER TO UTILITY PLANS. CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER CITY OF HEMET STD. NO. C-215. CONSTRUCT 8" CURB AND GUTTER, TYPE "B", PER CITY OF HEMET STD. NO. C-201. TEMPORARY 180FT TRANSITION FROM EX EOP AT EDGE OF BRIDGE TO FULL WIDTH IMPROVEMENT. CONSTRUCT 8" CURB AND GUTTER, TYPE "B", PER CITY STD. NO. C-201. FENCE PER ARCHITECTURAL & LANDSCAPING PLANS. UNDERGROUND INFILTRATION BASIN. REFER TO WQMP PLAN & DETAILS. CONSTRUCT PARKWAY CULVERT PER CITY OF HEMET STD D-307. CONSTRUCT TRASH ENCLOSURE PER CITY OF HEMET STD R-500B AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF HEMET SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION STD R-500 THROUGH R-503J. SCREENWALL PER STRUCTURAL PLANS. LANDSCAPING PER LANDSCAPE PLANS. PARKING LOT STRIPING PER CITY OF HEMET STD P-400 & P-401. 01020304050607080910111213141516171819202122 \\wma-arch.com\WM\IRV\21\0204\00\Civil\CAD\Sheets\Preliminary\IRV21-0204_Preliminary Grading Plan.dwg 07/DD/25 12:36 PM CPATTERSON 1:1 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN 0202 SHEET 11 SHEET 02 SHEET 09 SHEET 10 SHEET 07 SHEET 08 SHEET 06 SHEET 03 SHEET 04 SHEET 05 23

Page 264 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 368 of 806 ends

EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY N00°02'43"E 1,583.17'
S89°04'25"E 1,215.18'
(1500)
(1500)
(1500)
(1498)
(1498)
(1498)
(1499)
(1499) (1499)
(1499)
(1499)
(1499) SIMPSON ROAD PROPOSED BUILDING 1 FFE = 1499.00 PROPOSED BUILDING 2 FFE = 1500.00 LIMIT OF PROPOSED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS. REFER TO SITE SECTIONS FOR APPROX TIE IN TO EXISTING GRADE DESIGN. LANDSCAPE SETBACK ULTIMATE RIGHT-OF-WAY 32' 20'

1.9%

1.6% 1498.54 TC 1498.04 FS 1496.86 TC 1496.36 FS 1496.70 TC 1496.20 FS 1497.41 TC 1496.91 FS 1496.19 FL

1.6%

1.9%

1.5%

4.4%

11.4% 1.0%

1.9%

0.5%

1.4%

1.2% 3.1%

5.2% 0.3% 1499.73 FS (1499.44) FS 1499.09 FL 1500.04 FS 1499.76 FS 1499.40 FL 1500.65 FS 1500.36 FS 1499.70 FL

4.5% 13.0% 1500.94 FS 1500.61 FS 1500.69 TC 1500.03 FL 1494.40 FS-GB 1494.46 TC 1493.96 FS 1496.61 TC 1496.11 FS 1494.73 TC 1494.23 FS 1496.75 TC 1496.25 FS 1494.40 FS-GB

3.4%1498.85 FS 1499.07 TC 1498.57 FS 1495.13 TC 1494.63 FS 1500.22 TC 1499.55 FL 1499.23 TC 1498.57 FL1498.04 TC 1497.54 FS 1497.02 TC 1496.52 FS 0.1%

3.7% 1499.89 TC 1499.22 FL 1500.07 FS 0.3%

1.4% 1493.94 TC 1493.44 FS 1499.00 DOOR 1499.00 DOOR 1495.00 FS 1492.71 FL 1493.72 FL

6.00' EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT

26.00'

26.00' 26.00' 40.00' 60.00' 70.00' 55.00' 40.00'
30' EX PUBLIC & UTILITY EASEMENT
1 06 05 03 03 02 02 02 0202 02 04 0808 08 10 10 11 13 13 04 14 14 19 47'
PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE 1500.01 FS 1499.28 FS 1500.80 FS 1495.23 FL S86°36'20"E 58.06' S89°04'25"E 230.49' 1499.98 FL 1499.93 FS (TYP) 21 (TYP) 21 (TYP) 21 (TYP) 21 (TYP) 21 (TYP) 21

2.0%
MAX

2.0%

MAX LANE STRIPING (TYP) LANE STRIPING (TYP)

2.0%

2.0% 211.19' (TYP) 22 CAUTION: IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 24"x36" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO T FOR AND ON BEHALF OF WARE MALCOMB SHEET PA / PM: JOB NO.: DESIGNED:

REMARKS DATE NO. Sheet of DATE: PLOT DATE:
10 edelman
irvine, ca 92618
p 949.660.9128
waremalcomb.com

LEADING DESIGN FOR COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE

SEE SHEET 04
MATCHLINE SEE SHEET 07 MATCHLINE
SEE SHEET 02

MATCHLINE
\\wma-arch.com\WM\IRV\21\0204\00\Civil\CAD\Sheets\Preliminary\IRV21-0204_Preliminary Grading Plan.dwg 07/DD/25 12:40 PM CPATTERSON 1:1 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN 0303 SHEET 11 SHEET 02 SHEET 09 SHEET 10 SHEET 07 SHEET 08 SHEET 06 SHEET 03 SHEET 04 SHEET 05 GRADING PLAN CONSTRUCTION NOTES CONSTRUCT 6" CURB AND GUTTER, TYPE "A", PER CITY STD. NO. C-200 CONSTRUCT 6" CURB, TYPE "D", PER CITY STD. NO. C-203 CONSTRUCT 4' WIDE VALLEY GUTTER PER CITY STD. NO. C-213 CONSTRUCT HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS. CONSTRUCT LIGHT DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS. CONSTRUCT COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY PER CITY STD. NO. C-210A INFILTRATION BASIN. REFER TO UTLITY PLANS. STAIRS/STEPS PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AC BERM TRANSITION BACK TO EXISTING. ADA PATH OF TRAVEL. SHALL MEET THE CURRENT ADA STANDARDS. BOLLARD CATCH BASIN INLET. REFER TO UTILITY PLANS. CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER CITY OF HEMET STD. NO. C-215. CONSTRUCT 8" CURB AND GUTTER, TYPE "B", PER CITY OF HEMET STD. NO. C-201. TEMPORARY 180FT TRANSITION FROM EX EOP AT EDGE OF BRIDGE TO FULL WIDTH IMPROVEMENT. CONSTRUCT 8" CURB AND GUTTER, TYPE "B", PER CITY STD. NO. C-201. FENCE PER ARCHITECTURAL & LANDSCAPING PLANS. UNDERGROUND INFILTRATION BASIN. REFER TO WQMP PLAN & DETAILS. CONSTRUCT PARKWAY CULVERT PER CITY OF HEMET STD D-307. CONSTRUCT TRASH ENCLOSURE PER CITY OF HEMET STD R-500B AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF HEMET SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION STD R-500 THROUGH R-503J. SCREENWALL PER STRUCTURAL PLANS. LANDSCAPING PER LANDSCAPE PLANS. PARKING LOT STRIPING PER CITY OF HEMET STD P-400 & P-401. 01020304050607080910111213141516171819202122 23

Page 265 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 369 of 806 ends

S00°55'35"W 45.39' (1500)
(1500)
(1505)
(1510)
(1501)
(1501)
(1501)
(1502)
(1503)
(1504)
(1506)
(1507)
(1508)
(1509)
(1501)
(1502) (1503)
(1504)
(1504)
(1501)
(1502)
(1502)
(1502)
(1501)
(1502)
(1502) SIMPSON ROAD SIMPSON ROAD
WARREN ROAD PROPOSED INFILTRATION BASIN BOTTOM AREA = 24,373 SF ELEV 1496.00 EX EDGE OF PAVEMENT LIMIT OF PROPOSED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS. REFER TO SITE SECTIONS FOR APPROX TIE IN TO EXISTING GRADE DESIGN.

S44°22'02"W 2,161.65' ∆=14°45'19" R=135.00' L=34.77' ∆=29°25'35" R=753.00' L=386.73' ∆=46°33'14" R=847.00' L=688.20' ∆=46°33'14" R=847.00' ∆=29°25'35" R=753.00' L=386.73' ULTIMATE RIGHT-OF-WAY 47'
32'
25'

LANDSCAPE SETBACK

ULTIMATE RIGHT-OF-WAY
33'
25' 47' 25' 50'
50' 47'
25' TIE INTO EX PUBLIC & UTILITY EASEMENT EX EDGE OF PAVEMENT 0.3% 0.3%

19.5%
5:1
6:1
4:1
5:1
4:1
5:1

14.2%

2.1%

1.7%

3.4%

3.6% 1501.39 FS 1501.03 FS 1501.00 TC 1500.33 FL 1501.56 HP1501.74 FS 1501.34 FS 1501.78 TC 1501.12 FL 1503.1± ME 1501.20 TC 1500.53 FL 1501.19 TC 1500.52 FL 1500.96 FS 1501.18 FS 1501.40 FS 1501.43 TC 1500.76 FL 1501.41 TC 1500.75 FL 1502.39 TC 1501.72 FL 1502.29 TC 1501.62 FL 1506.99 TC 1506.33 FL1507.06 TC 1506.39 FL 13' 1501.64 FS 1501.91 FS 1502.69 FS 1502.72 FS 1501.90 FL 1502.54 FS 1502.15 FS 0.3% 4:1 1496.05 FS 1496.01 FS

0.5%

6.5% 1501.08 FG 1508.30 FS 1503.01 FS 1502.8± ME
BASIN BERM 1501.00 FS

10.00' 1502.52 TC 1502.02 FL

0.4% 1500.45 FS 1498.64 FS 1498.24 FS
6:1 N39°35'11"E 16.01' 1507.06 FS

1.3%

4.8%

0.5%

0.6% 15.00'

6.67' EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT

6.00'

6.00' EXISTING PROPERTY LINE MONUMENTATION (TYP.) 06 07 09 13 13 13 13 14 14 14 14 14 18 03 03 30' EX PUBLIC & UTILITY EASEMENT ULTIMATE RIGHT-OF-WAY EX. ROADWAY FACILITIES EASEMENT LIMIT OF STREETSCAPE LANDSCAPE SETBACK LIMIT OF STREETSCAPELANDSCAPE SETBACK S44°04'25"E 14.14'

94.00' 100.00'

25.00'

25.00' PROPOSED 124.07' TAPER (8:1) 32' 40'
32'
32'
15'
25' 50' (1500.85) FS 1501.54 FS 1502.47 FS 1502.59 FS 1501.71 FS 13 13 1502.17 FS (TYP) 21 (TYP) 21 (TYP) 21 (TYP) 21 2.0% MAX

2.0%
MAX

2.0% MAX

2.0%
MAX LANE STRIPING (TYP) LANE STRIPING (TYP) LANE STRIPING (TYP) LANE STRIPING (TYP) 1502.17 TC

1.4% 1501.50 FL 1502.14 FS (1501.75) FS

2.0% CAUTION: IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 24"x36" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO T FOR AND ON BEHALF OF WARE MALCOMB SHEET PA / PM: JOB NO.: DESIGNED:

REMARKS DATE NO. Sheet of DATE: PLOT DATE:
10 edelman
irvine, ca 92618
p 949.660.9128
waremalcomb.com

LEADING DESIGN FOR COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE

SEE SHEET 05
MATCHLINE SEE SHEET 08 MATCHLINE
SEE SHEET 03

MATCHLINE
\\wma-arch.com\WM\IRV\21\0204\00\Civil\CAD\Sheets\Preliminary\IRV21-0204_Preliminary Grading Plan.dwg 07/DD/25 12:45 PM CPATTERSON 1:1 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN 0404 SHEET 11 SHEET 02 SHEET 09 SHEET 10 SHEET 07 SHEET 08 SHEET 06 SHEET 03 SHEET 04 SHEET 05 GRADING PLAN CONSTRUCTION NOTES CONSTRUCT 6" CURB AND GUTTER, TYPE "A", PER CITY STD. NO. C-200 CONSTRUCT 6" CURB, TYPE "D", PER CITY STD. NO. C-203 CONSTRUCT 4' WIDE VALLEY GUTTER PER CITY STD. NO. C-213 CONSTRUCT HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS. CONSTRUCT LIGHT DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS. CONSTRUCT COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY PER CITY STD. NO. C-210A INFILTRATION BASIN. REFER TO UTLITY PLANS. STAIRS/STEPS PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AC BERM TRANSITION BACK TO EXISTING. ADA PATH OF TRAVEL. SHALL MEET THE CURRENT ADA STANDARDS. BOLLARD CATCH BASIN INLET. REFER TO UTILITY PLANS. CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER CITY OF HEMET STD. NO. C-215. CONSTRUCT 8" CURB AND GUTTER, TYPE "B", PER CITY OF HEMET STD. NO. C-201. TEMPORARY 180FT TRANSITION FROM EX EOP AT EDGE OF BRIDGE TO FULL WIDTH IMPROVEMENT. CONSTRUCT 8" CURB AND GUTTER, TYPE "B", PER CITY STD. NO. C-201. FENCE PER ARCHITECTURAL & LANDSCAPING PLANS. UNDERGROUND INFILTRATION BASIN. REFER TO WQMP PLAN & DETAILS. CONSTRUCT PARKWAY CULVERT PER CITY OF HEMET STD D-307. CONSTRUCT TRASH ENCLOSURE PER CITY OF HEMET STD R-500B AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF HEMET SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION STD R-500 THROUGH R-503J. SCREENWALL PER STRUCTURAL PLANS. LANDSCAPING PER LANDSCAPE PLANS. PARKING LOT STRIPING PER CITY OF HEMET STD P-400 & P-401. 01020304050607080910111213141516171819202122 23

Page 266 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 370 of 806 ends

(1504)
(1504)
(1504)
S89°04'25"E 1,024.66' ∆=3°41'30" R=2977.00' L=191.81'
S44°22'02"W 2,161.65' EX EDGE OF PAVEMENT LANDSCAPE SETBACK EXISTING PROPERTY LINE MONUMENTATION (TYP.) (1503)
(1502)
(1502)
(1502)
(1502)
(1501)

SALT CREEK CHANNEL
(RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL & WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT) 500.00'
230.00'
S89°04'25"E 531.92' ULTIMATE RIGHT-OF-WAY
33'
25' ∆=0°56'31" R=2977.00' L=48.94' (1502.02) FS (1503.57) FS (1503.63) FS (1502.92) FS (1504.34) FS (1503.56) FS
(1504.27) FS CAUTION: IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 24"x36" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO T FOR AND ON BEHALF OF WARE MALCOMB SHEET PA / PM: JOB NO.: DESIGNED:

REMARKS DATE NO. Sheet of DATE: PLOT DATE:
10 edelman
irvine, ca 92618
p 949.660.9128
waremalcomb.com

LEADING DESIGN FOR COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE

SEE SHEET 04

MATCHLINE
\\wma-arch.com\WM\IRV\21\0204\00\Civil\CAD\Sheets\Preliminary\IRV21-0204_Preliminary Grading Plan.dwg 07/DD/25 12:48 PM CPATTERSON 1:1 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN 0505 SHEET 11 SHEET 02 SHEET 09 SHEET 10 SHEET 07 SHEET 08 SHEET 06 SHEET 03 SHEET 04 SHEET 05 GRADING PLAN CONSTRUCTION NOTES CONSTRUCT 6" CURB AND GUTTER, TYPE "A", PER CITY STD. NO. C-200 CONSTRUCT 6" CURB, TYPE "D", PER CITY STD. NO. C-203 CONSTRUCT 4' WIDE VALLEY GUTTER PER CITY STD. NO. C-213 CONSTRUCT HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS. CONSTRUCT LIGHT DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS. CONSTRUCT COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY PER CITY STD. NO. C-210A INFILTRATION BASIN. REFER TO UTLITY PLANS. STAIRS/STEPS PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AC BERM TRANSITION BACK TO EXISTING. ADA PATH OF TRAVEL. SHALL MEET THE CURRENT ADA STANDARDS. BOLLARD CATCH BASIN INLET. REFER TO UTILITY PLANS. CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER CITY OF HEMET STD. NO. C-215. CONSTRUCT 8" CURB AND GUTTER, TYPE "B", PER CITY OF HEMET STD. NO. C-201. TEMPORARY 180FT TRANSITION FROM EX EOP AT EDGE OF BRIDGE TO FULL WIDTH IMPROVEMENT. CONSTRUCT 8" CURB AND GUTTER, TYPE "B", PER CITY STD. NO. C-201. FENCE PER ARCHITECTURAL & LANDSCAPING PLANS. UNDERGROUND INFILTRATION BASIN. REFER TO WQMP PLAN & DETAILS. CONSTRUCT PARKWAY CULVERT PER CITY OF HEMET STD D-307. CONSTRUCT TRASH ENCLOSURE PER CITY OF HEMET STD R-500B AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF HEMET SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION STD R-500 THROUGH R-503J. SCREENWALL PER STRUCTURAL PLANS. LANDSCAPING PER LANDSCAPE PLANS. PARKING LOT STRIPING PER CITY OF HEMET STD P-400 & P-401. 01020304050607080910111213141516171819202122 23

Page 267 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 371 of 806 ends

N00°02'43"E 2,138.02' SD SD
(1493)
(1493)
(1493) PROPOSED BUILDING 1 FFE = 1499.00 1494.40 FS-GB 1493.77 FS-GB 1489.91 TC 1489.41 FL 1490.82 TC 1490.32 FL

0.4% 1.0% 1494.85 DOOR 1494.84 FS 1499.00 DOOR 1495.45 FS

LANDSCAPE SETBACK
(1494)
(1495)
(1494)
(1494)
(1494)
(1494)
(1494)
(1494)
(1493)
1496
(1493)
(1493)
(1493)
(1492)
(1493) 01 01 04 0408080808 080808 11 12 17 (1495.14) FS (1493.48) FS (1493.33) FS 15.00' 20 2.0% MAX 2.0% MAX CAUTION: IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 24"x36" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO T FOR AND ON BEHALF OF WARE MALCOMB SHEET PA / PM: JOB NO.: DESIGNED:

REMARKS DATE NO. Sheet of DATE: PLOT DATE:
10 edelman
irvine, ca 92618
p 949.660.9128
waremalcomb.com

LEADING DESIGN FOR COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE

SEE SHEET 07
MATCHLINE SEE SHEET 09 MATCHLINE SEE SHEET 02 MATCHLINE \\wma-arch.com\WM\IRV\21\0204\00\Civil\CAD\Sheets\Preliminary\IRV21-0204_Preliminary Grading Plan.dwg 07/DD/25 12:38 PM CPATTERSON 1:1 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN 0606 SHEET 11 SHEET 02 SHEET 09 SHEET 10 SHEET 07 SHEET 08 SHEET 06 SHEET 03 SHEET 04 SHEET 05 GRADING PLAN CONSTRUCTION NOTES CONSTRUCT 6" CURB AND GUTTER, TYPE "A", PER CITY STD. NO. C-200 CONSTRUCT 6" CURB, TYPE "D", PER CITY STD. NO. C-203 CONSTRUCT 4' WIDE VALLEY GUTTER PER CITY STD. NO. C-213 CONSTRUCT HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS. CONSTRUCT LIGHT DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS. CONSTRUCT COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY PER CITY STD. NO. C-210A INFILTRATION BASIN. REFER TO UTLITY PLANS. STAIRS/STEPS PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AC BERM TRANSITION BACK TO EXISTING. ADA PATH OF TRAVEL. SHALL MEET THE CURRENT ADA STANDARDS. BOLLARD CATCH BASIN INLET. REFER TO UTILITY PLANS. CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER CITY OF HEMET STD. NO. C-215. CONSTRUCT 8" CURB AND GUTTER, TYPE "B", PER CITY OF HEMET STD. NO. C-201. TEMPORARY 180FT TRANSITION FROM EX EOP AT EDGE OF BRIDGE TO FULL WIDTH IMPROVEMENT. CONSTRUCT 8" CURB AND GUTTER, TYPE "B", PER CITY STD. NO. C-201. FENCE PER ARCHITECTURAL & LANDSCAPING PLANS. UNDERGROUND INFILTRATION BASIN. REFER TO WQMP PLAN & DETAILS. CONSTRUCT PARKWAY CULVERT PER CITY OF HEMET STD D-307. CONSTRUCT TRASH ENCLOSURE PER CITY OF HEMET STD R-500B AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF HEMET SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION STD R-500 THROUGH R-503J. SCREENWALL PER STRUCTURAL PLANS. LANDSCAPING PER LANDSCAPE PLANS. PARKING LOT STRIPING PER CITY OF HEMET STD P-400 & P-401. 01020304050607080910111213141516171819202122 23

Page 268 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 372 of 806 ends

N00°02'43"E 1,583.17'
(1495)
(1495)
(1496)
(1496)
(1496)
(1497)
(1496)
(1496)
(1497)
(1497)
(1497)
(1498) PROPOSED BUILDING 1 FFE = 1499.00 PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE

0.5%

1.5% 1494.40 FS-GB 1494.40 FS-GB 1.0% 1.0% 1493.44 FS 1499.00 DOOR 1495.00 FS 1499.00 DOOR 1495.00 FS 1492.46 FL 1493.70 HP 1491.60 TG (1497)
(1497)
(1497)
(1497)
(1498)
(1496) 0303 02 02 02 0404 080808 08 080808 11 12

4.0%

2.5% 11.3%8.8% (TYP) 21 (TYP) 21 CAUTION: IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 24"x36" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO T FOR AND ON BEHALF OF WARE MALCOMB SHEET PA / PM: JOB NO.: DESIGNED:

REMARKS DATE NO. Sheet of DATE: PLOT DATE:
10 edelman
irvine, ca 92618
p 949.660.9128
waremalcomb.com

LEADING DESIGN FOR COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE

SEE SHEET 08
MATCHLINE SEE SHEET 10 MATCHLINE
SEE SHEET 06
MATCHLINE SEE SHEET 03 MATCHLINE
\\wma-arch.com\WM\IRV\21\0204\00\Civil\CAD\Sheets\Preliminary\IRV21-0204_Preliminary Grading Plan.dwg 07/DD/25 12:45 PM CPATTERSON 1:1 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN 0707 SHEET 11 SHEET 02 SHEET 09 SHEET 10 SHEET 07 SHEET 08 SHEET 06 SHEET 03 SHEET 04 SHEET 05 GRADING PLAN CONSTRUCTION NOTES CONSTRUCT 6" CURB AND GUTTER, TYPE "A", PER CITY STD. NO. C-200 CONSTRUCT 6" CURB, TYPE "D", PER CITY STD. NO. C-203 CONSTRUCT 4' WIDE VALLEY GUTTER PER CITY STD. NO. C-213 CONSTRUCT HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS. CONSTRUCT LIGHT DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS. CONSTRUCT COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY PER CITY STD. NO. C-210A INFILTRATION BASIN. REFER TO UTLITY PLANS. STAIRS/STEPS PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AC BERM TRANSITION BACK TO EXISTING. ADA PATH OF TRAVEL. SHALL MEET THE CURRENT ADA STANDARDS. BOLLARD CATCH BASIN INLET. REFER TO UTILITY PLANS. CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER CITY OF HEMET STD. NO. C-215. CONSTRUCT 8" CURB AND GUTTER, TYPE "B", PER CITY OF HEMET STD. NO. C-201. TEMPORARY 180FT TRANSITION FROM EX EOP AT EDGE OF BRIDGE TO FULL WIDTH IMPROVEMENT. CONSTRUCT 8" CURB AND GUTTER, TYPE "B", PER CITY STD. NO. C-201. FENCE PER ARCHITECTURAL & LANDSCAPING PLANS. UNDERGROUND INFILTRATION BASIN. REFER TO WQMP PLAN & DETAILS. CONSTRUCT PARKWAY CULVERT PER CITY OF HEMET STD D-307. CONSTRUCT TRASH ENCLOSURE PER CITY OF HEMET STD R-500B AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF HEMET SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION STD R-500 THROUGH R-503J. SCREENWALL PER STRUCTURAL PLANS. LANDSCAPING PER LANDSCAPE PLANS. PARKING LOT STRIPING PER CITY OF HEMET STD P-400 & P-401. 01020304050607080910111213141516171819202122 23

Page 269 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 373 of 806 ends

(1495)
(1495)
(1500)
(1505)
(1510)
(1510)
(1515)
(1515)
(1492)
(1492)
(1493)
(1493)
(1494)
(1494)
(1496)
(1496)
(1497)
(1497)
(1498)
(1498)
(1499) (1501)
(1502)
(1503)
(1504)
(1506)
(1507)
(1508)
(1509)
(1511)
(1511)
(1512)
(1512)
(1513)
(1513)
(1514)
(1514)
(1498)
(1498)
(1498)
(1498)
(1498)
S44°22'02"W 2,161.65' S45°37'39"E 81.35' ∆=46°33'14" R=847.00' L=688.20' S45°38'46"E 81.16' ∆=29°25'35" R=753.00' L=386.73'

LANDSCAPE SETBACK
5'
47'
47'
25'
50'

15.8%

19.5%
3:1
3:1
7:1

3.9%

0.8%
2:1
BASIN BERM 1501.00 FS

25.00' EXISTING BRIDGE EXISTING STORM DRAIN CULVERT EXISTING PROPERTY LINE MONUMENTATION (TYP.) (1495)
(1493)
(1494)
(1496)
(1497)
(1498)
(1499)
(1495)
(1496)
(1497)
(1498)

SALT CREEK CHANNEL
(RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL & WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT) 500.00'
230.00' 15 14 14 07 15

EX ROADWAY
FACILITIES EASEMENT ULTIMATE RIGHT-OF-WAY LIMIT OF STREETSCAPE (VARIES) LANDSCAPE SETBACK LANDSCAPE SETBACK LIMIT OF STREETSCAPE PROPOSED STRIPING TAPER 425FT FROM BRIDGE PROPOSED STRIPING TAPER 50' PROPOSED INTERIM WARREN CL FROM BRIDGE (1499.94) FS (1515.67) FS
(1515.69) FS

2.0%
MAX

2.0%
MAX STRIPING (TYP) CAUTION: IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 24"x36" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO T FOR AND ON BEHALF OF WARE MALCOMB SHEET PA / PM: JOB NO.: DESIGNED:

REMARKS DATE NO. Sheet of DATE: PLOT DATE:
10 edelman
irvine, ca 92618
p 949.660.9128
waremalcomb.com

LEADING DESIGN FOR COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE

SEE SHEET 07
MATCHLINE SEE SHEET 04 MATCHLINE
\\wma-arch.com\WM\IRV\21\0204\00\Civil\CAD\Sheets\Preliminary\IRV21-0204_Preliminary Grading Plan.dwg 07/DD/25 12:40 PM CPATTERSON 1:1 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN 0808 SHEET 11 SHEET 02 SHEET 09 SHEET 10 SHEET 07 SHEET 08 SHEET 06 SHEET 03 SHEET 04 SHEET 05 GRADING PLAN CONSTRUCTION NOTES CONSTRUCT 6" CURB AND GUTTER, TYPE "A", PER CITY STD. NO. C-200 CONSTRUCT 6" CURB, TYPE "D", PER CITY STD. NO. C-203 CONSTRUCT 4' WIDE VALLEY GUTTER PER CITY STD. NO. C-213 CONSTRUCT HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS. CONSTRUCT LIGHT DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS. CONSTRUCT COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY PER CITY STD. NO. C-210A INFILTRATION BASIN. REFER TO UTLITY PLANS. STAIRS/STEPS PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AC BERM TRANSITION BACK TO EXISTING. ADA PATH OF TRAVEL. SHALL MEET THE CURRENT ADA STANDARDS. BOLLARD CATCH BASIN INLET. REFER TO UTILITY PLANS. CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER CITY OF HEMET STD. NO. C-215. CONSTRUCT 8" CURB AND GUTTER, TYPE "B", PER CITY OF HEMET STD. NO. C-201. TEMPORARY 180FT TRANSITION FROM EX EOP AT EDGE OF BRIDGE TO FULL WIDTH IMPROVEMENT. CONSTRUCT 8" CURB AND GUTTER, TYPE "B", PER CITY STD. NO. C-201. FENCE PER ARCHITECTURAL & LANDSCAPING PLANS. UNDERGROUND INFILTRATION BASIN. REFER TO WQMP PLAN & DETAILS. CONSTRUCT PARKWAY CULVERT PER CITY OF HEMET STD D-307. CONSTRUCT TRASH ENCLOSURE PER CITY OF HEMET STD R-500B AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF HEMET SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION STD R-500 THROUGH R-503J. SCREENWALL PER STRUCTURAL PLANS. LANDSCAPING PER LANDSCAPE PLANS. PARKING LOT STRIPING PER CITY OF HEMET STD P-400 & P-401. 01020304050607080910111213141516171819202122 23

Page 270 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 374 of 806 ends

EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY SD SDSD SD
(1493)
(1493)
(1493)
(1493)
(1493)
(1493)
(1493)
(1493)
(1493)
(1493) PROPOSED BUILDING 1 FFE = 1499.00 1498.13 TC 1497.63 FL N00°02'43"E 2,138.02'

2.2%

2.6% 1.0% 1.7%

0.2%

1.0%

1.1%

1.0%

2.1%

1.1%

2.2%

1.0%

1.1% 1494.40 FS-GB 1499.00 DOOR 1499.24 TC 1498.74 FS 1499.24 TC 1498.74 FS 1499.24 TC 1498.74 FS 1499.24 TC 1498.74 FS 1499.24 TC 1498.74 FS 1499.24 TC 1498.74 FS 1498.40 TC 1497.90 FS 1498.43 TC 1497.93 FS 1498.40 TC 1497.90 FS 1498.40 TC 1497.90 FS 1498.34 TC 1497.84 FS 1497.62 TC 1497.12 FL 1497.13 TC 1496.63 FL 1497.30 TC 1496.80 FL 1496.25 TC 1495.75 FL 1495.85 TC 1495.35 FS 1493.93 TC 1493.43 FS 1492.30 TC 1491.80 FL 1493.51 TC 1493.01 FL

0.2%

2.7% 1493.35 FL 1495.58 FL1498.40 TC 1497.90 FS 1494.20 TC 1493.70 FS 1499.00 DOOR 1495.00 FS 55.00' 70.00' 60.00'

26.00'

26.00' 26.00'

26.00'

26.00' 26.00' 40.00' 40.00'

26.00' 20.00'
(1493)
(1494)
(1494)
(1494)
(1494) 03 02 02 02 02 0101 04 0808 08 08 05 05 05 11 01 01 17 04 17 02 19 20.00' (1494.78) FS (1493.31) FS LANDSCAPE SETBACK 1493.38 FS PROPOSED ACCESS EASEMENT 20 (TYP) 21 (TYP) 21 (TYP) 21 2.0% MAX 2.0% MAX (TYP) 22 (TYP) 22 CAUTION: IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 24"x36" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO T FOR AND ON BEHALF OF WARE MALCOMB SHEET PA / PM: JOB NO.: DESIGNED:

REMARKS DATE NO. Sheet of DATE: PLOT DATE:
10 edelman
irvine, ca 92618
p 949.660.9128
waremalcomb.com

LEADING DESIGN FOR COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE

SEE SHEET 10
MATCHLINE SEE SHEET 11 MATCHLINE SEE SHEET 06 MATCHLINE \\wma-arch.com\WM\IRV\21\0204\00\Civil\CAD\Sheets\Preliminary\IRV21-0204_Preliminary Grading Plan.dwg 07/DD/25 12:37 PM CPATTERSON 1:1 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN 0909 SHEET 11 SHEET 02 SHEET 09 SHEET 10 SHEET 07 SHEET 08 SHEET 06 SHEET 03 SHEET 04 SHEET 05 GRADING PLAN CONSTRUCTION NOTES CONSTRUCT 6" CURB AND GUTTER, TYPE "A", PER CITY STD. NO. C-200 CONSTRUCT 6" CURB, TYPE "D", PER CITY STD. NO. C-203 CONSTRUCT 4' WIDE VALLEY GUTTER PER CITY STD. NO. C-213 CONSTRUCT HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS. CONSTRUCT LIGHT DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS. CONSTRUCT COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY PER CITY STD. NO. C-210A INFILTRATION BASIN. REFER TO UTLITY PLANS. STAIRS/STEPS PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AC BERM TRANSITION BACK TO EXISTING. ADA PATH OF TRAVEL. SHALL MEET THE CURRENT ADA STANDARDS. BOLLARD CATCH BASIN INLET. REFER TO UTILITY PLANS. CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER CITY OF HEMET STD. NO. C-215. CONSTRUCT 8" CURB AND GUTTER, TYPE "B", PER CITY OF HEMET STD. NO. C-201. TEMPORARY 180FT TRANSITION FROM EX EOP AT EDGE OF BRIDGE TO FULL WIDTH IMPROVEMENT. CONSTRUCT 8" CURB AND GUTTER, TYPE "B", PER CITY STD. NO. C-201. FENCE PER ARCHITECTURAL & LANDSCAPING PLANS. UNDERGROUND INFILTRATION BASIN. REFER TO WQMP PLAN & DETAILS. CONSTRUCT PARKWAY CULVERT PER CITY OF HEMET STD D-307. CONSTRUCT TRASH ENCLOSURE PER CITY OF HEMET STD R-500B AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF HEMET SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION STD R-500 THROUGH R-503J. SCREENWALL PER STRUCTURAL PLANS. LANDSCAPING PER LANDSCAPE PLANS. PARKING LOT STRIPING PER CITY OF HEMET STD P-400 & P-401. 01020304050607080910111213141516171819202122 23

Page 271 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 375 of 806 ends

S44°22'02"W 2,161.65' EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY EV CHARGING ONLY SD SD SD SD (1496)(1496)
(1496) (1496)
(1496) (1496)
(1496) (1496)
(1496) (1496)
(1496)
(1496)
(1496)
(1496)
(1496)
(1496)
(1496)
(1496) (1496)
(1497)
(1497)
(1497)
(1496)
(1496)
(1496)
(1496)
(1496) PROPOSED BUILDING 1 FFE = 1499.00

LANDSCAPE SETBACK
N00°02'43"E 1,583.17'
5'

1.0% 12.3%

3.2% 1.0% 1.0%

2.7%

1.5%

1.2%

2.1% 1494.40 FS-GB 1494.30 TC 1493.80 FS 1499.00 DOOR PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE 1499.24 TC 1498.74 FS 1499.24 TC 1498.74 FS 1498.52 TC 1498.02 FL 1497.86 TC 1497.36 FL 1497.05 TC 1496.55 FL 1499.00 DOOR 1495.00 FS

0.5% 1491.60 TG 1493.38 FL 1492.26 FL 40.00' 60.00' 70.00' 55.00'

40.00'

26.00'

SALT CREEK CHANNEL
(RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL & WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT) 500.00'
230.00' 03 03 0202 02 02 02 01 04 08 080808 05 11 01 12 19 PROPOSED 10 FT WIDE PRIVATE STORM DRAIN EASEMENT

10.00'
(1496.05) FS
(1496.25) FS 04 04 (TYP) 21 (TYP) 21 (TYP) 21 (TYP) 22 CAUTION: IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 24"x36" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO T FOR AND ON BEHALF OF WARE MALCOMB SHEET PA / PM: JOB NO.: DESIGNED:

REMARKS DATE NO. Sheet of DATE: PLOT DATE:
10 edelman
irvine, ca 92618
p 949.660.9128
waremalcomb.com

LEADING DESIGN FOR COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE

SEE SHEET 09
MATCHLINE SEE SHEET 07 MATCHLINE GRADING LEGEND PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION PROPOSED SLOPE / GRADE EXISTING SLOPE / GRADE HP HIGH POINT LP LOW POINT ME MATCH EXISTING DOOR ELEVATION AT DOOR FFE FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION FG FINISHED GRADE FL FLOWLINE FS FINISHED SURFACE GB GRADE BREAK RIM RIM ELEVATION RL RIDGE LINE TC TOP OF CURB TG TOP OF GRADE 5280.00 (5280.0) 2.00% 2.00% \\wma-arch.com\WM\IRV\21\0204\00\Civil\CAD\Sheets\Preliminary\IRV21-0204_Preliminary Grading Plan.dwg 07/DD/25 12:42 PM CPATTERSON 1:1 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN 1010 SHEET 11 SHEET 02 SHEET 09 SHEET 10 SHEET 07 SHEET 08 SHEET 06 SHEET 03 SHEET 04 SHEET 05 GRADING PLAN CONSTRUCTION NOTES CONSTRUCT 6" CURB AND GUTTER, TYPE "A", PER CITY STD. NO. C-200 CONSTRUCT 6" CURB, TYPE "D", PER CITY STD. NO. C-203 CONSTRUCT 4' WIDE VALLEY GUTTER PER CITY STD. NO. C-213 CONSTRUCT HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS. CONSTRUCT LIGHT DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS. CONSTRUCT COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY PER CITY STD. NO. C-210A INFILTRATION BASIN. REFER TO UTLITY PLANS. STAIRS/STEPS PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AC BERM TRANSITION BACK TO EXISTING. ADA PATH OF TRAVEL. SHALL MEET THE CURRENT ADA STANDARDS. BOLLARD CATCH BASIN INLET. REFER TO UTILITY PLANS. CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER CITY OF HEMET STD. NO. C-215. CONSTRUCT 8" CURB AND GUTTER, TYPE "B", PER CITY OF HEMET STD. NO. C-201. TEMPORARY 180FT TRANSITION FROM EX EOP AT EDGE OF BRIDGE TO FULL WIDTH IMPROVEMENT. CONSTRUCT 8" CURB AND GUTTER, TYPE "B", PER CITY STD. NO. C-201. FENCE PER ARCHITECTURAL & LANDSCAPING PLANS. UNDERGROUND INFILTRATION BASIN. REFER TO WQMP PLAN & DETAILS. CONSTRUCT PARKWAY CULVERT PER CITY OF HEMET STD D-307. CONSTRUCT TRASH ENCLOSURE PER CITY OF HEMET STD R-500B AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF HEMET SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION STD R-500 THROUGH R-503J. SCREENWALL PER STRUCTURAL PLANS. LANDSCAPING PER LANDSCAPE PLANS. PARKING LOT STRIPING PER CITY OF HEMET STD P-400 & P-401. 01020304050607080910111213141516171819202122 23

Page 272 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 376 of 806 ends

SD SD SD SDSD
(1493)
(1493)
(1493)
(1494)
(1494)
(1495) (1495)
(1495)
(1493)
(1493)
(1494) (1494)
(1494)
(1494)
(1493)
(1493)
(1493)
(1493) 1497.31 TC 1496.81 FL

LANDSCAPE SETBACK
S86°11'06"W 73.73' ∆=41°49'03" R=1275.86' L=931.19' N00°02'43"E 2,138.02' 5'

1.0%

0.6%

1.7%

1.0%

0.5%

2.2%

1.7%

1.0%

0.5%

1.0% 1496.91 TC 1496.41 FS 1497.09 TC 1496.59 FS 1497.10 TC 1496.60 FS 1497.17 TC 1496.67 FS 1496.46 TC 1495.96 FS 1496.40 TC 1495.90 FS 1493.92 TC 1493.42 FL 1493.96 TC 1493.46 FL 1495.19 TC 1494.69 FL 1496.41 TC 1495.91 FL 1497.62 TC 1497.12 FL 1495.83 TC 1495.33 FL 1494.92 TC 1494.42 FL 0.9% 1495.68 TC 1495.18 FL 1493.44 TC 1492.94 FL 1493.95 TC 1493.45 FL 1495.39 TC 1494.89 FL 1496.84 TC 1496.34 FL

26.00'

26.00' 26.00' EXISTING PROPERTY LINE MONUMENTATION (TYP.) LANDSCAPE SETBACK 20.00'

SALT CREEK CHANNEL
(RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL & WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT) 230.00'
500.00' 02 02 01 01 01 01 05 05 05 05 01 01 01 01 01 12 17 17 02 10 FT WIDE PRIVATE STORM DRAIN EASEMENT

10.00'
(1493.87) FS
(???) FS

40.00' PROPOSED ACCESS EASEMENT (???) FS (???) FS 04 04 04 (TYP) 21 (TYP) 21 (TYP) 21 (TYP) 21 (TYP) 21 (TYP) 21 2.0% MAX (TYP) 22 (TYP) 22 CAUTION: IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 24"x36" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO T FOR AND ON BEHALF OF WARE MALCOMB SHEET PA / PM: JOB NO.: DESIGNED:

REMARKS DATE NO. Sheet of DATE: PLOT DATE:
10 edelman
irvine, ca 92618
p 949.660.9128
waremalcomb.com

LEADING DESIGN FOR COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE

NEWLAND SIMPSON
35655 SIMPSON RD
HEMET, CA 92596 IRV21-0204 L. CORSBIE C. PATTERSON 07/11/2022 26 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION07/02/25
0 SCALE: 1" = 15 30 60 30' WARE MALCOMB assumes no responsibility for utility locations. The utilities shown on this drawing have been plotted from the best available information. It is, however, the contractors responsibility to field verify the location of all utilities prior to the commencement of any construction. GRADING LEGEND PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION PROPOSED SLOPE / GRADE EXISTING SLOPE / GRADE HP HIGH POINT LP LOW POINT ME MATCH EXISTING DOOR ELEVATION AT DOOR FFE FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION FG FINISHED GRADE FL FLOWLINE FS FINISHED SURFACE GB GRADE BREAK RIM RIM ELEVATION RL RIDGE LINE TC TOP OF CURB TG TOP OF GRADE 5280.00 (5280.0) 2.00% 2.00% KEY MAP SCALE:N.T.S. SEE SHEET 09 MATCHLINE \\wma-arch.com\WM\IRV\21\0204\00\Civil\CAD\Sheets\Preliminary\IRV21-0204_Preliminary Grading Plan.dwg 07/DD/25 12:43 PM CPATTERSON 1:1 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN 1111 SHEET 11 SHEET 02 SHEET 09 SHEET 10 SHEET 07 SHEET 08 SHEET 06 SHEET 03 SHEET 04 SHEET 05 GRADING PLAN CONSTRUCTION NOTES CONSTRUCT 6" CURB AND GUTTER, TYPE "A", PER CITY STD. NO. C-200 CONSTRUCT 6" CURB, TYPE "D", PER CITY STD. NO. C-203 CONSTRUCT 4' WIDE VALLEY GUTTER PER CITY STD. NO. C-213 CONSTRUCT HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS. CONSTRUCT LIGHT DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS. CONSTRUCT COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY PER CITY STD. NO. C-210A INFILTRATION BASIN. REFER TO UTLITY PLANS. STAIRS/STEPS PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AC BERM TRANSITION BACK TO EXISTING. ADA PATH OF TRAVEL. SHALL MEET THE CURRENT ADA STANDARDS. BOLLARD CATCH BASIN INLET. REFER TO UTILITY PLANS. CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER CITY OF HEMET STD. NO. C-215. CONSTRUCT 8" CURB AND GUTTER, TYPE "B", PER CITY OF HEMET STD. NO. C-201. TEMPORARY 180FT TRANSITION FROM EX EOP AT EDGE OF BRIDGE TO FULL WIDTH IMPROVEMENT. CONSTRUCT 8" CURB AND GUTTER, TYPE "B", PER CITY STD. NO. C-201. FENCE PER ARCHITECTURAL & LANDSCAPING PLANS. UNDERGROUND INFILTRATION BASIN. REFER TO WQMP PLAN & DETAILS. CONSTRUCT PARKWAY CULVERT PER CITY OF HEMET STD D-307. CONSTRUCT TRASH ENCLOSURE PER CITY OF HEMET STD R-500B AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF HEMET SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION STD R-500 THROUGH R-503J. SCREENWALL PER STRUCTURAL PLANS. LANDSCAPING PER LANDSCAPE PLANS. PARKING LOT STRIPING PER CITY OF HEMET STD P-400 & P-401. 01020304050607080910111213141516171819202122 23

Page 273 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 377 of 806 ends

1490 1500 1510 0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+00 PROPOSED BUILDING 1 FFE = 1499.00

CL SIMPSON ROAD

EX PROPERTY LINE

EX EDGE OF PAVEAC PAVING APPROXIMATE EX GRADE VALLEY GUTTER JOIN EXISTING @ EDGE OF PAVEMENT 47FT WIDE ULTIMATE ROW CONCRETE SIDEWALK LANDSCAPING MAX 3:1 SLOPE SIMPSON ROAD - ROAD WIDENING 32'

EX EDGE OF PAVE APPROXIMATE EX GRADE
PROFILE CONTINUATION FROM 15+75.00
2%
30FT WIDE EX ROW

FLOWLINE
VARIES 1.0% 1.8% LANDSCAPING MAX 3:1 SLOPE 6IN CONCRETE CURB 15' 30FT WIDE EX ROW 8IN CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER 6FT WIDE CONCRETE SIDEWALK (MAX 2% SLOPE) 1490 1500 1510 16+00 16+50 17+00 17+50 18+00 18+50 19+00 19+50 20+00 20+50 21+00 21+50 PROPOSED BUILDING 1 FFE = 1499.00 AC PAVING 6INCONCRETE CURB 6IN CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER 6INCONCRETE CURB 6IN CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER AC PAVING MATCH EX GRADE 2FT BENCH APPROXIMATE EX GRADE

PROPERTY LINE APPROXIMATE EX GRADE
PROFILE CONTINUEATION FROM 4+25.00 CONCRETE SIDEWALK 1.0% LANDSCAPING1.0% 0 SCALE: 1" = 10 20 40 20' CAUTION: IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 24"x36" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO T FOR AND ON BEHALF OF WARE MALCOMB SHEET PA / PM: JOB NO.: DESIGNED:

REMARKS DATE NO. Sheet of DATE: PLOT DATE:
10 edelman
irvine, ca 92618
p 949.660.9128
waremalcomb.com

LEADING DESIGN FOR COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE

NEWLAND SIMPSON
35655 SIMPSON RD
HEMET, CA 92596 IRV21-0204 L. CORSBIE C. PATTERSON 07/11/2022 26 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION07/02/25 WARE MALCOMB assumes no responsibility for utility locations. The utilities shown on this drawing have been plotted from the best available information. It is, however, the contractors responsibility to field verify the location of all utilities prior to the commencement of any construction. \\wma-arch.com\WM\IRV\21\0204\00\Civil\CAD\Sheets\Preliminary\IRV21-0204_Preliminary Site Sections.dwg 07/DD/25 12:16 PM CPATTERSON 1:1 PRELIMINARY SITE SECTION 1212 SECTION A-A (STA 0+00.00 TO STA 4+25.00) SCALE HORIZONTAL 1" = 20' VERTICAL 1" = 4' SECTION A-A (STA 15+7.00 TO STA 21+00.00) SCALE HORIZONTAL 1" = 20' VERTICAL 1" = 4' A
A
C
C
B
B
D
D 1111 1212 1313 14-15
14-15 23

Page 274 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 378 of 806 ends

1490 1500 1510 0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+00

CL SIMPSON ROAD

EX PROPERTY LINE

EX EDGE OF PAVEMENT 8IN CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER APPROXIMATE EX GRADE SIMPSON ROAD - ROAD WIDENING 32'

EX EDGE OF PAVEMENT
PROFILE CONTINUEATION FROM 8+25.00
30FT WIDE EX ROW

FLOWLINE
2% 6FT WIDE CONCRETE SIDEWALK (MAX 2%
SLOPE) 15' JOIN EXISTING @ EDGE OF PAVEMENT
VARIES
30FT WIDE EX ROW
47FT WIDE ULTIMATE ROW MATCH EXISTING GRADE 8+50 9+00 9+50 10+00 10+50 11+00 11+50 12+00 12+50 13+00 13+50 14+00 APPROXIMATE EX GRADE APPROXIMATE EX GRADE

PROPERTY LINE
PROFILE CONTINUEATION FROM 4+25.00 CAUTION: IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 24"x36" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO T FOR AND ON BEHALF OF WARE MALCOMB SHEET PA / PM: JOB NO.: DESIGNED:

REMARKS DATE NO. Sheet of DATE: PLOT DATE:
10 edelman
irvine, ca 92618
p 949.660.9128
waremalcomb.com

LEADING DESIGN FOR COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE

The utilities shown on this drawing have been plotted from the best available information. It is, however, the contractorsresponsibility to field verify the location of all utilities prior to the commencement of any construction.
\\wma-arch.com\WM\IRV\21\0204\00\Civil\CAD\Sheets\Preliminary\IRV21-0204_Preliminary Site Sections.dwg 07/DD/25 12:15 PM CPATTERSON 1:1 PRELIMINARY SITE SECTION 1313 SECTION B-B (STA 0+00.00 TO STA 4+25.00) SCALE HORIZONTAL 1" = 20' VERTICAL 1" = 4' SECTION B-B (STA 8+25.00 TO STA 14+00.00) SCALE HORIZONTAL 1" = 20' VERTICAL 1" = 4' 14-15 14-15 13 12 13 12 11 11
D
D
B
B
C
A
C
A 23

Page 275 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 379 of 806 ends

1490 1500 1510 0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 3+00

EX EDGE OF PAVE

CL SIMPSON ROAD

EX PROPERTY LINE APPROXIMATE EX GRADE 8IN CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER

EX EDGE OF PAVE

WIDTH VARIES ULTIMATE ROW
(TRANSITION FROM 47FT TO 33FT) SIMPSON ROAD - ROAD WIDENING 32' MATCHLINE @ 3+25.00
30FT WIDE EX ROW

FLOWLINE
2% 6FT WIDE CONCRETE SIDEWALK (MAX 2%
SLOPE) 15' JOIN EXISTING @ EDGE OF PAVEMENT
VARIES
30FT WIDE EX ROW MATCH EXISTING GRADE 1490 1500 1510 3+50 4+00 4+50 5+00 5+50 6+00 6+50 7+00 7+50 8+00 8+50 PROPOSED DRAINAGE MANAGEMENT BASIN BOTTOM = 1496.00 10 FT WIDE BERM ELEV. 1501.00 1 4
1 4 MATCH EXISTING GRADE

PROPERTY LINE APPROXIMATE EX GRADE
MATCHLINE @ 3+25.00
MATCHLINE @ 3+25.00 MATCH EXISTING GRADE CAUTION: IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 24"x36" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO T FOR AND ON BEHALF OF WARE MALCOMB SHEET PA / PM: JOB NO.: DESIGNED:

REMARKS DATE NO. Sheet of DATE: PLOT DATE:
10 edelman
irvine, ca 92618
p 949.660.9128
waremalcomb.com

LEADING DESIGN FOR COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE

The utilities shown on this drawing have been plotted from the best available information. It is, however, the contractorsresponsibility to field verify the location of all utilities prior to the commencement of any construction.
\\wma-arch.com\WM\IRV\21\0204\00\Civil\CAD\Sheets\Preliminary\IRV21-0204_Preliminary Site Sections.dwg 07/DD/25 12:19 PM CPATTERSON 1:1 PRELIMINARY SITE SECTION 1414 SECTION C-C (STA 0+00.00 TO STA 3+25.00) SCALE HORIZONTAL 1" = 20' VERTICAL 1" = 4' SECTION C-C (STA 3+25.00 TO STA 8+00.00) SCALE HORIZONTAL 1" = 20' VERTICAL 1" = 4' 14-15 14-15 13 12 13 12 11 11
D
D
B
B
C
A
C
A 23

Page 276 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 380 of 806 ends

1490 1500 1510 0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+00 PROPERTY LINE 6IN CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER MATCH EXISTING GRADE 4FT TRUCK DOCK PROPOSED BUILDING 1 FFE = 1499.00 APPROXIMATE EX GRADE PROFILE CONTINUATION FROM 7+25.00 LANDSCAPING AREA

3.7%

1.2%

1.1%
ACCESS EASEMENT 20.00'

2.0% ACCESS ROAD SCREENWALL 7+50 8+00 8+50 9+00 9+50 10+00 10+50 11+00 11+50 12+00 12+50 PROPOSED BUILDING 1 FFE = 1499.00 4FT TRUCK DOCK VALLEY GUTTER 6IN CONCRETE CURB

PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE LANDSCAPING AREA
PROFILE CONTINUATION FROM 4+25.00
MATCHLINE @ 12+75.00

1.0%

1.8%

1.4%
1 2 MATCH EXISTING GRADE CAUTION: IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 24"x36" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO T FOR AND ON BEHALF OF WARE MALCOMB SHEET PA / PM: JOB NO.: DESIGNED:

REMARKS DATE NO. Sheet of DATE: PLOT DATE:
10 edelman
irvine, ca 92618
p 949.660.9128
waremalcomb.com

LEADING DESIGN FOR COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE

NEWLAND SIMPSON
35655 SIMPSON RD
HEMET, CA 92596 IRV21-0204 L. CORSBIE C. PATTERSON 07/11/2022 26 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION07/02/25
0 SCALE: 1" = 10 20 40 20' WARE MALCOMB assumes no responsibility for utility locations. The utilities shown on this drawing have been plotted from the best available information. It is, however, the contractors responsibility to field verify the location of all utilities prior to the commencement of any construction. \\wma-arch.com\WM\IRV\21\0204\00\Civil\CAD\Sheets\Preliminary\IRV21-0204_Preliminary Site Sections.dwg 07/DD/25 12:21 PM CPATTERSON 1:1 PRELIMINARY SITE SECTION 1515 SECTION D-D (STA 0+00.00 TO STA 4+25.00) SCALE HORIZONTAL 1" = 20' VERTICAL 1" = 4' SECTION D-D (STA 7+25.00 TO 12+75.00) SCALE HORIZONTAL 1" = 20' VERTICAL 1" = 4' 14-15 14-15 13 12 13 12 11 11
D
D
B
B
C
A
C
A 23

Page 277 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 381 of 806 ends

13+00 13+50 14+00 14+50 15+00 15+50 16+00 16+50 17+00 17+50 WARREN ROAD 47FT WIDE ULTIMATE ROW
1 2 2FT BENCH MAX 2:1 SLOPE 6FT WIDE CONCRETE SIDEWALK (MAX 2% SLOPE)
FLOWLINE 8IN CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER
WARREN ROAD CENTERLINE 8IN CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER WARREN ROAD - ROAD WIDENING 1 2 2FT BENCH MAX 2:1 SLOPE MATCH PROPOSED GRADE 6FT WIDE CONCRETE SIDEWALK (MAX 2% SLOPE) APPROXIMATE EX GRADE FLOWLINE 25' 10' 32'
MATCHLINE @ 12+75.00
MATCHLINE @ 12+75.00

2.0%

2.0%
25FT LANDSCAPE SETBACK
10FT STREETSCAPE
WARREN ROAD 47FT WIDE ULTIMATE ROW
10FT STREETSCAPE
25FT LANDSCAPE SETBACK VALLEY GUTTER 15' 32' 15' 10' 25' MATCH EXISTING GRADE CAUTION: IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 24"x36" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO T FOR AND ON BEHALF OF WARE MALCOMB SHEET PA / PM: JOB NO.: DESIGNED:

REMARKS DATE NO. Sheet of DATE: PLOT DATE:
10 edelman
irvine, ca 92618
p 949.660.9128
waremalcomb.com

LEADING DESIGN FOR COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE

NEWLAND SIMPSON
35655 SIMPSON RD
HEMET, CA 92596 IRV21-0204 L. CORSBIE C. PATTERSON 07/11/2022 26 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION07/02/25
0 SCALE: 1" = 20 40 80 40' WARE MALCOMB assumes no responsibility for utility locations. The utilities shown on this drawing have been plotted from the best available information. It is, however, the contractors responsibility to field verify the location of all utilities prior to the commencement of any construction. \\wma-arch.com\WM\IRV\21\0204\00\Civil\CAD\Sheets\Preliminary\IRV21-0204_Preliminary Site Sections.dwg 07/DD/25 12:19 PM CPATTERSON 1:1 PRELIMINARY SITE SECTION 1616 SECTION D-D (STA 12+25.00 TO 17+50.00) SCALE HORIZONTAL 1" = 20' VERTICAL 1" = 4' 14-15 14-15 13 12 13 12 11 11
D
D
B
B
C
A
C
A 23

Page 278 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 382 of 806 ends

1490 1500 1510 0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+00 PROPOSED BUILDING 1 FFE = 1499.00

CL SIMPSON ROAD

EX PROPERTY LINE

EX EDGE OF PAVEAC PAVING APPROXIMATE EX GRADE VALLEY GUTTER JOIN EXISTING @ EDGE OF PAVEMENT 47FT WIDE ULTIMATE ROW CONCRETE SIDEWALK LANDSCAPING MAX 3:1 SLOPE SIMPSON ROAD - ROAD WIDENING 32'

EX EDGE OF PAVE APPROXIMATE EX GRADE
PROFILE CONTINUATION FROM 15+75.00
2%
30FT WIDE EX ROW

REMARKS DATE NO. Sheet of DATE: PLOT DATE:
10 edelman
irvine, ca 92618
p 949.660.9128
waremalcomb.com

LEADING DESIGN FOR COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE

Page 279 of 604 ends

13.C.

Page 383 of 806 ends

1490 1500 1510 0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+00

CL SIMPSON ROAD

EX PROPERTY LINE

EX EDGE OF PAVEMENT 8IN CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER APPROXIMATE EX GRADE SIMPSON ROAD - ROAD WIDENING 32'

EX EDGE OF PAVEMENT
PROFILE CONTINUEATION FROM 8+25.00
30FT WIDE EX ROW

REMARKS DATE NO. Sheet of DATE: PLOT DATE:
10 edelman
irvine, ca 92618
p 949.660.9128
waremalcomb.com

LEADING DESIGN FOR COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE

The utilities shown on this drawing have been plotted from the best available information. It is, however, the contractorsresponsibility to field verify the location of all utilities prior to the commencement of any construction.
\\wma-arch.com\WM\IRV\21\0204\00\Civil\CAD\Sheets\Preliminary\IRV21-0204_Preliminary Site Sections.dwg 07/DD/25 12:15 PM CPATTERSON 1:1 PRELIMINARY SITE SECTION 1313 SECTION B-B (STA 0+00.00 TO STA 4+25.00) SCALE HORIZONTAL 1" = 20' VERTICAL 1" = 4' SECTION B-B (STA 8+25.00 TO STA 14+00.00) SCALE HORIZONTAL 1" = 20' VERTICAL 1" = 4' 14-15 14-15 13 12 13 12 11 11
D
D
B
B
C
A
C
A 23

Page 280 of 604 ends

Hemet City CouncilJuly 14, 2025

Hemet City Council
July 14, 2025