Agenda — Hemet City Council, January 13, 2026 (part 4 of 6)

16.D.

Page 175 of 488 ends

3 Reference is made to the boundary map of Annexation No. 2 (Zone 4) into the District recorded in Book 96 of Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities Districts on June 25, 2025, at Page 63 in the office of the County Recorder for the County of Riverside, State of California, as Document No. 2025-0190246.

Reference is made to the boundary map of Annexation No. 3 (Zone 5) into the District recorded in Book 96 of Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities Districts on August 20, 2025, at Page 88 in the office of the County Recorder for the County of Riverside, State of California, as Document No. 2025-0256665.

Reference is made to the boundary map of Annexation No. 4 (Zone 6) into the District recorded in Book ____ of Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities Districts on _____, 2025, at Page _____in the office of the County Recorder for the County of Riverside, State of California, as Document No. 2025-_________.

For further information concerning the current and estimated future tax liability of owners or purchasers of real property subject to this special tax lien, interested persons should contact the Finance Manager at the City of Hemet, 445 E. Florida Ave., Hemet, CA 92543, phone (951) 765-2300.

Dated: _______________, 2026
By: __________________________
John Paul Maier
City Clerk
City of Hemet

Page 36 of 58 ends

16.D.

Page 176 of 488 ends

A-1
EXHIBIT “A”

a) Maintenance and lighting of parks, parkways, streets, roads and open space, which maintenance and lighting services may include, without limitation, furnishing of electrical power to street lights; repair and replacement of damaged or inoperative light bulbs, fixtures and standards; maintenance of streets and roadways including slurry seal, asphalt overly and other similar maintenance; maintenance (including irrigation and replacement) of landscaping vegetation situated on or adjacent to parks, parkways, streets, roads and open space; maintenance and repair of irrigation facilities; maintenance of public signage; graffiti removal from and maintenance and repair of public structures situated on parks, parkways, streets, roads and open space; maintenance and repair of playground or recreation program equipment or facilities situated on any park; and

c) Public street sweeping, on the segments of the arterials within the boundaries of CFD 2024- 01; as well as local roads within residential subdivisions located within CFD 2024-01; and any portions adjacent to the properties within CFD 2024-01; and

In addition to payment of the cost and expense of the forgoing services, proceeds of the special tax may be expended to pay “Administrative Expenses,” as said term is defined in the Rate and Method of Apportionment as well as the “Incidental Expenses”, as defined in the Resolution of Intention, as follows:

Page 37 of 58 ends

16.D.

Page 177 of 488 ends

A-2

INCIDENTAL EXPENSES

The cost of the Services shall include incidental expenses, including costs associated with formation of the District, determination of the amount of the Special Tax, collection of the Special Tax, payment of the Special Tax, costs incurred in order to carry out the authorized purposes of the District, and the costs of engineering, inspecting, coordinating, completing, planning and designing the Services, including the costs of environmental evaluations.

The following incidental expenses are examples of those that may be incurred in the formation of the District:

• Engineering services,

• Publishing, mailing and posting of notices,

• Governmental notification and filing costs,

• Election costs, and

• Charges and fees of the City other than those waived.

The following incidental expenses are examples of those that may be incurred in each annual Special Tax levy:

• Necessary consultant costs,

• Costs of posting and collecting the special taxes, and

Administrative costs of the City related to each annual Special Tax levy.

Page 38 of 58 ends

16.D.

Page 178 of 488 ends

B-1
EXHIBIT “B”

RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAX FOR
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2024-01
(PUBLIC FACILITIES MAINTENANCE)

OF THE CITY OF HEMET, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Page 39 of 58 ends

16.D.

Page 179 of 488 ends

1 RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAX FOR
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2024-01
(PUBLIC FACILITIES MAINTENANCE)

OF THE CITY OF HEMET, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA

A Special Tax (all capitalized terms are defined in Section A., “Definitions”, below) shall be applicable to each Parcel of Taxable Property located within the boundaries of Community Facilities District No. 2024-01 (Public Facilities Maintenance) (the CFD). The amount of Special Tax to be levied on a Parcel in each Fiscal Year, commencing in Fiscal Year 2024-2025, shall be determined by the City Council of the City of Hemet, acting in its capacity as the legislative body of the CFD by applying the appropriate Special Tax as set forth in Sections B, C and D, below. All of the real property within the CFD, unless exempted by law or by the provisions of Section F. below, shall be taxed for the purposes, to the extent and in the manner herein provided.

A. DEFINITIONS

The terms hereinafter set forth have the following meanings:

“Accessory Dwelling Unit(s)” means a secondary attached or detached dwelling unit with complete independent living facilities for one or more persons.

“Acre or Acreage” means the land area of a Parcel as indicated on the most recent Assessor’s Parcel Map, or if the land area is not shown on the Assessor’s Parcel Map, the land area shown on the applicable Final Map, condominium plan, other recorded County map, or the land area calculated to the reasonable satisfaction of the Administrator using the boundaries set forth on such map or plan.

“Act” means the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended, being Chapter 2.5 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California (Sections 53311 - 53368).

“Administrative Expenses” means all actual or reasonably estimated costs and expenses of the CFD that are chargeable or allocable to carry out duties of the CFD as allowed by the Act. This may include, without limitation, all costs and expenses arising out of or resulting from the annual levy and collection of the Special Tax (whether by the City, the Administrator or both), any litigation or appeal involving the CFD, and other administrative expenses of the City or Administrator directly related to the CFD.

Administrative Expenses shall also include amounts estimated or advanced by the City or CFD for attorney’s fees and other costs related to commencing and pursuing to completion any foreclosure as a result of delinquent Special Taxes.

“Administrator” means a person or firm designated by the CFD to administer the Special Tax.

“Approved Property” means all Parcels of Taxable Property: (i) that are included in a Final Map that was recorded prior to January 1st preceding the Fiscal Year in which the

Page 40 of 58 ends

16.D.

Page 180 of 488 ends

2 Special Tax is being levied; and (ii) that have not been issued a Building Permit prior to the April 1st preceding the Fiscal Year in which the Special Tax is being levied.

“Assessor” means the Assessor of the County.

“Assessor’s Parcel(s)” or “Parcel(s)” means a lot or parcel within the CFD shown on an Assessor’s Parcel Map with an assigned Assessor’s Parcel Number valid as of July 1st for the Fiscal Year for which the Special Tax is being levied.

“Assessor’s Parcel Map” means an official map of the County Assessor of the County designating Parcels by Assessor’s Parcel Number.

“Assessor’s Parcel Number” or “APN” means the number assigned to a lot or Parcel for purposes of identification as determined from an Assessor Parcel Map or the applicable assessment roll.

“Base Year” means the Fiscal Year ending June 30, 2024. Rates in this Rate and Method of Apportionment for the initial formation are based on FY 2024-25 costs which will be escalated beginning in FY 2025-26. Base Year for future annexations shall be the fiscal year the annexation was approved by the City Council of the City of Hemet.

“Boundary Map” means a recorded map of the CFD that indicates by a boundary line the extent of the territory identified to be subject to the levy of Special Taxes, as may be amended due to future annexations of territory to the CFD.

"Building Square Footage" or “BSF” means the floor area square footage reflected on the original construction building permit issued for construction of a building of Non‐ Residential Property and any Building Square Footage subsequently added to a building of such Non‐Residential Property after issuance of a building permit for expansion or renovation of such building.

"Building Permit" means the first legal document issued by a local agency giving official permission for new construction.

“Capital Replacement” means to repair or replace improvements being maintained by the CFD.

“CFD” or “CFD 2024-01” means Community Facilities District No. 2024-01 (Public Facilities Maintenance) of the City of Hemet.

“City” means the City of Hemet, California

“Condominium Residential Property” means a Developed Parcel with an approved land use for residential condominiums (two or more attached units which can each be owned individually). Parcels that are open space, recreation, clubhouse, etc., owned by a condominium association, homeowner’s association or property owner’s association, are Exempt Property.

Page 41 of 58 ends

16.D.

Page 181 of 488 ends

3 “Consumer Price Index” or “CPI” means the Consumer Price Index published by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistic for “All Urban Consumers” in the Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario area.

“Consumer Price Index Inflation Factor” means, for any Fiscal Year, the annual change in the Consumer Price Index which shall be measured from the month of March in the Calendar Year that ends in the previous Fiscal Year to the month of March preceding the Fiscal Year. The Maximum Special Tax Rates in Table 1 and Table 2 shall be increased by the amount of the Consumer Price Index Inflation Factor, with a maximum annual increase of six percent (6%) and a minimum annual increase of two percent (2%) of the Maximum Special Tax Rates in effect for the previous Fiscal Year. In the event this index ceases to be published, the Consumer Price Index shall be another index as determined by the Administrator that is reasonably comparable to the Consumer Price Index for the Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario Area.

“Contingent Services” means services permitted under the Mello‐Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 including, without limitation, those services authorized to be funded by CFD No. 2024‐01 as set forth in the documents adopted by the City Council at the time the CFD was formed to be provided by the City in the event the Administrator makes a determination pursuant to the definition of Special Tax B (Contingent) that a POA fails to adequately provide such services.

“Council” means the City Council of the City acting as the legislative body of the CFD.

“County” means the County of Riverside, California.

“Developed Property” means all Parcels of Taxable Property: (i) that are included in a Final Map that was recorded prior to January 1st preceding the Fiscal Year in which the Special Tax is being levied; and (ii) for which a Building Permit for new construction has been issued prior to April 1st preceding the Fiscal Year in which the Special Tax is being levied.

“Exempt Property” means any Parcel that is exempt from Special Taxes pursuant to Section F., below.

“Final Map” means a subdivision of property by recordation of a map or lot line adjustment, pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act (California Government Code Section 66410 et seq.) or recordation of a condominium plan pursuant to California Civil Code 1352 that creates individual lots for which Building Permits may be issued without further subdivision.

“Fiscal Year” means the 12-month period starting on July 1 of any calendar year and ending the following June 30.

“Future Annexation Area” means the geographic area that, at the time of CFD formation, was considered potential annexation area for the CFD and which was, therefore, identified as “future annexation area” on the recorded Boundary Map. Such designation does not mean that any or all of the Future Annexation Area will annex into

Page 42 of 58 ends

16.D.

Page 182 of 488 ends

4 the CFD, but should property designated as Future Annexation Area choose to annex, the annexation may be processed pursuant to the annexation procedures in the Act for territory included in the Future Annexation Area, as well as the procedures established by the City.

“Land Use Class” or “LUC” means any of the classes listed in Table 1 or Table 2 of Section C. or Appendix A, below.

“Maximum Special Tax” means either Maximum Special Tax A and/or Maximum Special Tax B (Contingent), as applicable.

“Maximum Special Tax A” means, for each Parcel in each Fiscal Year, the greatest Special Tax A amount, determined in accordance with Section C., below, that may be levied on such Parcel in such Fiscal Year.

“Maximum Special Tax B (Contingent)” means, for each Parcel in each Fiscal Year, the greatest Special Tax B (Contingent) amount, determined in accordance with Section C., below, that may be levied on such Parcel in such Fiscal Year.

“Maximum Special Tax Rate (s)” means, for each Fiscal Year, the greatest Special Tax rate, determined in accordance with Section C., below, that may be levied on a Parcel in such Fiscal Year.

“Mixed Use Property” means all Parcels of Developed Property with more than one land use including residential, commercial, retail or other land uses.

“Multifamily Residential Property” or “MFR” means all Parcels of Developed Property that consists of a building or buildings comprised of attached Residential Dwelling Units available for rental by the general public, not for sale to an end user, and under common management.

“Non-Residential Property” means all Parcels of Developed Property for which a Building Permit was issued, permitting the construction of one or more commercial, retail or other types of structure other than a residential structure.

“Operating Reserves” means cash reserves to fund the Special Tax Requirement in the event of cash flow shortages or unexpected increases in operating, repair and maintenance costs (excluding capital improvements).

“Property Owner’s Association Property” means all Parcels that have been conveyed, dedicated to, or irrevocably offered for dedication to a property owner association (“POA”), including any master or sub-association, prior to April 1 preceding the Fiscal Year in which the Special Tax is being levied, within a Tax Zone. The Special Tax shall not be levied on Property Owner’s Association Property. If any Property Owner’s Association Property is converted to Taxable Property as the result of a sale of an Exempt Parcel to a private owner for residential or non-residential development, it shall become subject to the Special Tax in accordance with this Rate and Method of Apportionment as determined pursuant to Sections C. and D.

Page 43 of 58 ends

16.D.

Page 183 of 488 ends

5 “Proportionately” means for Parcels of Taxable Property that are (i) Developed Property, the ratio of the applied Special Tax levy to the Maximum Special Tax is the same for all Parcels of Developed Property; (ii) Approved Property, the ratio of the applied Special Tax levy to the Maximum Special Tax is the same for all Parcels of Approved Property; and (iii) Undeveloped Property, Public Property or Property Owner’s Association Property, the ratios of the applied Special Tax levy per Acre to the Maximum Special Tax per Acre is the same for all Parcels of Undeveloped Property, Public Property and Property Owner’s Association Property.

“Public Property” means all Parcels which, as of April 1st preceding the Fiscal Year in which the Special Tax is being levied, are (i) used for rights-of-way or any other purpose and is owned by, dedicated to, or irrevocably offered for dedication to the federal government, the State, the County, City or any other public agency, provided, however, that any property leased by a public agency to a private entity and subject to taxation under Section 53340.1 of the Act shall be taxed and classified according to its use; or (ii) encumbered by an unmanned utility easement making impractical its utilization for other than the purpose set forth in the easement.

“Residential Dwelling Unit” or "RDU" means a residential unit that is used or intended to be used as a domicile by one or more persons, as determined by the Administrator.

“Residential Property” means all Parcels of Developed Property for which a Building Permit has been issued permitting the construction of one or more Residential Dwelling Units.

“Service(s)” means services permitted under the Mello‐Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 including, without limitation, those services authorized to be funded by CFD No. 2024‐01 as set forth in the documents adopted by the City Council at the time the CFD was formed.

“Single Family Residential Property” or “SFR” means all Parcels of Residential Property, other than Accessory Dwelling Unit, Condominium Residential Property or Multifamily Residential Property.

“Special Tax(es)” means the Special Tax A or Special Tax B (Contingent) to be levied in each Fiscal Year on each Parcel of Taxable Property in accordance with Section D.

“Special Tax A” means the special tax to be levied in each Fiscal Year on each Parcel of Taxable Property in accordance with Section D.1 to fund the Special Tax A Requirement.

“Special Tax Area A” means the parcels comprising Special Tax Area A as depicted and defined in the initial Boundary Map and as depicted and defined in the Boundary Map of each additional property annexed into CFD No. 2024-01.

“Special Tax A Requirement” means for each Tax Zone for each Fiscal Year, the Special Tax A amount required to: (1) pay the estimated cost of Special Tax A Services including but not limited to (i) maintenance of landscaping and lighting of parks, parkways,

Page 44 of 58 ends

16.D.

Page 184 of 488 ends

6 streets, roads and open space, (ii) maintenance and operation of water quality improvements, (iii) maintenance of streets and roadways, including but not limited to slurry seal, asphalt overlay, public street sweeping and similar roadway maintenance, for such Fiscal Year as determined by the City; (2) fund the Special Tax A Reserve Fund in an amount not to exceed 20% of the Special Tax A Reserve Fund Requirement; (3) pay Administrative Expenses; (4) pay for an actual or anticipated shortfall due to Special Tax A delinquencies in the current or prior Fiscal Year; and (5) provide a credit for funds that are available to reduce the annual Special Tax A levy, if any, as determined by the Administrator. The Special Tax A Authorized Services are defined in detail in Exhibit B of the Rate and Method of Apportionment.

“Special Tax A Reserve Fund” means a fund to be used for Capital Replacement and Operating Reserves related to the Special Tax A Services.

“Special Tax A Reserve Fund Requirement” for each Zone equals 100% of the estimated cost of Special Tax A Services in the Base Year. The Special Tax A Reserve Fund Requirement shall be increased annually, commencing July 1, 2025, based on the Consumer Price Index Inflation Factor.

“Special Tax A Services” means those authorized services, permitted under the Mello‐ Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 as defined in Exhibit B of the Rate and Method of Apportionment, but limited to those services set forth in the documents adopted by the City Council at the time the CFD was formed as Special Tax A Services.

“Special Tax B (Contingent)” or “Special Tax B” means the annual special tax to be levied in each Fiscal Year on each Assessor’s Parcel of Taxable Property, in accordance with Section D.2, to fund the Special Tax B (Contingent) Requirement, if required.

Maintenance of the Special Tax B Improvements shall be the responsibility of the Property Owner’s Association as long as the Special Tax B Improvements are being maintained to a standard acceptable to the City. Special Tax B shall begin to be levied in the first year in which (i) the City determines that the Special Tax B Improvements have not been maintained to a standard acceptable to the City, (ii) the POA files for bankruptcy or (iii) the POA is dissolved. The City shall not levy Special Tax B without first giving notice to the Property Owner’s Association specifying the maintenance deficiency related to the Special Tax B Improvements and allowing a sufficient period, as determined by the City, for curing such deficiency.

“Special Tax Area B (Contingent)” means the parcels comprising Special Tax Area B as depicted and defined in the initial Boundary Map and as depicted and defined in the Boundary Map of each additional property annexed into CFD No. 2024-01.

“Special Tax B (Contingent) Improvements” means the improvements that are maintained and operated as described in Special Tax B Services.

“Special Tax B (Contingent) Requirement” means for each Tax Zone for each Fiscal Year, the Special Tax B amount required to: (1) pay the estimated cost of Special Tax B Services including but not limited to (i) maintenance of landscaping and lighting of parks, parkways, streets, roads and open space, (ii) maintenance and operation of water quality

Page 45 of 58 ends

16.D.

Page 185 of 488 ends

7 improvements, (iii) maintenance of streets and roadways, including but not limited to slurry seal, asphalt overlay, public street sweeping and similar roadway maintenance, for such Fiscal Year as determined by the City; (2) fund the Special Tax B Reserve Fund in an amount not to exceed 20% of the Special Tax B Reserve Fund Requirement; (3) pay Administrative Expenses. The Special Tax B Authorized Services are defined in detail in Exhibit B of the Rate and Method of Apportionment.

“Special Tax B (Contingent) Reserve Fund” means a fund to be used for Capital Replacement and Operating Reserves related to the Special Tax B Services.

“Special Tax B (Contingent) Reserve Fund Requirement” for each Tax Zone equals 100% of the estimated cost of Special Tax B (Contingent) Services in the Base Year. The Special Tax B Reserve Fund Requirement shall be increased annually, commencing July 1, 2025, based on the Consumer Price Index Inflation Factor.

“Special Tax B (Contingent) Services” means those authorized services, permitted under the Mello‐Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 as defined in Exhibit B of the Rate and Method of Apportionment, but limited to those services, for each Tax Zone, as set forth in the documents adopted by the City Council at the time the CFD was formed as Special Tax B (Contingent) Services.

“State” means the State of California.

"Tax Zone" means a mutually exclusive geographic area, within which particular Special Tax rates may be levied pursuant to this Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Tax. Table 1, Table 2, Table 3 and Appendix A identify the initial Tax Zones created at formation of the CFD. Appendix A may be updated to include new Parcels or new Tax Zones added to the CFD as a result of future annexations.

“Taxable Property” means all Parcels within the boundary of the CFD, inclusive of Special Tax Area A and Special Tax Area B (Contingent) pursuant to the Boundary Map that are not exempt from the Special Tax pursuant to Section F., below.

“Taxable Unit” means either a RDU, BSF or an Acre, as shown in Table 1 or Table 2 of Section C.

“Undeveloped Property” means all Parcels of Taxable Property not classified as Developed Property, Approved Property, Public Property, or Property Owner’s Association Property.

B. ASSIGNMENT TO LAND USE CLASS

For each Fiscal Year, commencing Fiscal Year 2024-2025, all Parcels of Taxable Property shall be classified as either Developed Property, Approved Property, Undeveloped Property, Public Property, or Property Owner’s Association Property; and subject to the levy of Special Taxes in accordance with this Rate and Method of Apportionment as determined pursuant to Sections C. and D.

Page 46 of 58 ends

16.D.

Page 186 of 488 ends

8 Parcels of Developed Property shall further be classified as Residential Property or Non- Residential Property. Parcels of Residential Property shall further be classified as Single Family Residential Property, Condominium Residential Property or Multifamily Residential Property. The number of Residential Dwelling units shall be determined by the Administrator.

C. MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX RATES

For each Fiscal Year commencing Fiscal Year 2024-2025, Maximum Special Tax Rates shall be determined as described below:

For purposes of determining the applicable Maximum Special Tax for Assessor’s Parcels of Developed Property and Approved Property which are classified as Residential Property, all such Assessor’s Parcels shall be assigned the number of RDUs constructed or to be constructed thereon as specified in or shown on the building permit(s) issued or Final Map as determined by the Administrator. Once a single family attached or multi‐ family building or buildings have been built on an Assessor's Parcel, the Administrator shall determine the actual number of RDUs contained within the building or buildings, and the Special Tax A and or the Special Tax B levied against the Assessor’s Parcel in the next Fiscal Year shall be calculated by multiplying the actual number of RDUs by the Maximum Special Tax per RDU for the applicable Tax Zone shown in the Tables below or as included in Appendix A as each annexation occurs. For purposes of determining the applicable Maximum Special Tax for Assessor’s Parcels of Developed Property and Approved Property which are classified as Non‐Residential Property, all such Assessor’s Parcels shall be assigned the quantity of BSF or Acres as shown on the Final Map as determined by the Administrator. Once the Administrator determines the actual quantity of BSF or Acres for the Assessor’s Parcels, the Special Tax A and/or the Special Tax B levied against the Assessor’s Parcel in the next Fiscal Year shall be calculated by multiplying the quantity of BSF or Acres by the Maximum Special Tax per Taxable Unit identified for the applicable Tax Zone shown in the Tables below or as included in Appendix A as each annexation occurs.

1. Developed Property

The Maximum Special Tax A and Maximum Special Tax B for each Assessor’s Parcel of Developed Property shall be specific to each Tax Zone within the CFD.

When additional property is annexed into CFD No. 2024-01, the rate and method adopted for the annexed property shall reflect the Maximum Special Tax A for the Tax Zones annexed and included in Appendix A. The Maximum Special Tax A and Maximum Special Tax B for Developed Property for Fiscal Year 2024‐25 within Tax Zone 1 and Tax Zone 2 are identified in Table 1 below and in Appendix A. These Maximum Special Tax Rates are subject to annual escalation in accordance with Section C. 5.

Page 47 of 58 ends

16.D.

Page 187 of 488 ends

9 TABLE 1
Maximum Special Tax Rates for Developed Property
Fiscal Year 2024-2025

Tax Zone
Tract/Parcel
Map Land Use Class
Taxable
Unit
Maximum
Special Tax A
Per Taxable
Unit
Maximum
Special Tax B
Per Taxable
Unit
1 PM 14318 Non-Residential Property Acre $2,493.00 $0.00 2 PM 36566 Non-Residential Property Acre $823.00 $0.00

Mixed Use Property

The Maximum Special Tax that may be levied on a Parcel of Mixed Use Property shall be the sum of the Maximum Special Tax for each of the Parcels land uses based on Table 1. The Maximum Special Tax Rate for Single Family Residential Property shall apply to any Residential Dwelling Units on the parcel. The Maximum Special Tax Rate for Acreage shall apply to the other land uses on the property, with Acreage for each land use determined by reference to the approved site plan for such Parcel. Maximum Special Tax Rates are subject to annual escalation in accordance with Section C. 5.

2. Approved Property

The Maximum Special Tax A and Maximum Special Tax B for each Assessor’s Parcel of Approved Property shall be specific to each Tax Zone within the CFD. When additional property is annexed into CFD No. 2024-01, the rate and method adopted for the annexed property shall reflect the Maximum Special Tax A and/or Maximum Special Tax B, as applicable, for the Tax Zone annexed and included in Appendix A.

In determining the Maximum Special Tax A and Maximum Special Tax B for Approved Property for Fiscal Year 2024‐25 within Tax Zone 1 and Tax Zone 2 for each Parcel of Approved Property, the Undeveloped Property Maximum Special Tax Rate from Section C.3 (Table 2) times the Acreage of such Parcel shall be applied; provided, however, that for a Parcel of Approved Property that is expected to become Single Family Residential Property, as reasonably determined by the Administrator based on the Final Map for such Parcel, the Maximum Special Tax for such Parcel of Approved Property shall be calculated utilizing Section C.1 (Table 1) as if such Parcel were already designated as Single Family Residential Property. Maximum Special Tax Rates are subject to annual escalation in accordance with Section C. 5.

Page 48 of 58 ends

16.D.

Page 188 of 488 ends

10 3. Undeveloped Property

The Maximum Special Tax A and Maximum Special Tax B for each Assessor’s Parcel of Undeveloped Property shall be specific to each Tax Zone within the CFD. When additional property is annexed into CFD No. 2024‐01, the rate and method adopted for the annexed property shall reflect the Maximum Special Tax A and/or Maximum Special Tax B, as applicable, for the Tax Zone annexed and included in Appendix A.

The Maximum Special Tax A and Maximum Special Tax B for Undeveloped Property for Fiscal Year 2024‐25 within Tax Zone 1 and Tax Zone 2 are identified in Table 3 below and in Appendix A. These Maximum Special Tax Rates are subject to annual escalation in accordance with Section C. 5.

TABLE 2
Maximum Special Tax Rates for Undeveloped Property
Fiscal Year 2024-2025

4. Taxable Public Property and Property Owner’s Association Property The Maximum Special Tax A and Maximum Special Tax B that may be levied for FY 2024-25 on each Parcel of Taxable Public Property or Taxable Property Owners Association Property shall be equal to the product of the applicable Undeveloped Property Maximum Special Tax Rates for each Tax Zone shown in Appendix A multiplied by the Acreage of such Parcel. These Maximum Special Tax Rates are subject to annual escalation in accordance with Section C. 5.

5. Increase in the Maximum Special Tax A and Maximum Special Tax B (Contingent)

On each July 1, commencing on July 1, 2025 the Maximum Special Tax A and Maximum Special Tax B for Developed Property, Approved Property, Undeveloped Property and Taxable Public Property and Property Owner’s Association Property shall increase by Consumer Price Index Inflation Factor.

Page 49 of 58 ends

16.D.

Page 189 of 488 ends

11 D. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF THE SPECIAL TAX

1. Special Tax A

Commencing with Fiscal Year 2024-2025 and for each following Fiscal Year, the Administrator shall levy Special Tax A on all Taxable Property within Special Tax Area A up to the amount of the Special Tax A Requirement in accordance with the following steps:

First: The Special Tax A shall be levied Proportionately on each Parcel of Developed Property at up to 100% of the applicable Maximum Special Tax for each Parcel as needed to satisfy the Special Tax A Requirement; then

Second: If additional moneys are needed to satisfy the Special Tax A Requirement after the first step has been completed, Special Tax A shall be levied Proportionately on each Parcel of Approved Property at up to 100% of the applicable Maximum Special Tax for each Parcel as needed to satisfy the Special Tax A Requirement; then

Third: If additional moneys are needed to satisfy the Special Tax A Requirement after the first two steps have been completed, Special Tax A shall be levied Proportionately on each Parcel of Undeveloped Property at up to 100% of the applicable Maximum Special Tax for each Parcel as needed to satisfy the Special Tax A Requirement.

Fourth: If additional moneys are needed to satisfy the Special Tax A Requirement after the first three steps have been completed, Special Tax A shall be levied Proportionately on each Parcel of Taxable Public Property and Property Owner’s Association Property at up to 100% of the applicable Maximum Special Tax for each Parcel as needed to satisfy the Special Tax A Requirement.

2. Special Tax B (Contingent)

Commencing with Fiscal Year 2024-2025 and for each following Fiscal Year, the Administrator may levy Special Tax B on all Taxable Property within Special Tax Area B up to the amount of the Special Tax B Requirement in accordance with the following steps:

First: If levied, Special Tax B shall be levied Proportionately on each Parcel of Developed Property at up to 100% of the applicable Maximum Special Tax for each Parcel as needed to satisfy the Special Tax B Requirement; then

Second: If additional moneys are needed to satisfy the Special Tax B Requirement after the first step has been completed, Special Tax B shall be levied Proportionately on each Parcel of Approved Property at up to 100% of the applicable Maximum Special Tax for each Parcel as needed to satisfy the Special Tax B Requirement; then

Page 50 of 58 ends

16.D.

Page 190 of 488 ends

12 Third: If additional moneys are needed to satisfy the Special Tax B Requirement after the first two steps have been completed, Special Tax B shall be levied Proportionately on each Parcel of Undeveloped Property at up to 100% of the applicable Maximum Special Tax for each Parcel as needed to satisfy the Special Tax B Requirement.

Fourth: If additional moneys are needed to satisfy the Special Tax B Requirement after the first three steps have been completed, Special Tax B shall be levied Proportionately on each Parcel of Taxable Public Property and Property Owner’s Association Property at up to 100% of the applicable Maximum Special Tax for each Parcel as needed to satisfy the Special Tax B Requirement.

Notwithstanding the above, under no circumstances will the Special Tax be levied in any Fiscal Year against any Assessor’s Parcel of Residential Property as a result of a delinquency in the payment of the Special Tax applicable to any other Assessor’s Parcel be increased by more than ten percent (10%) above the amount that would have been levied in that Fiscal Year had there never been any such delinquency or default.

E. FUTURE ANNEXATIONS

It is anticipated that additional properties will be annexed to CFD No. 2024-01 from time to time. As each annexation is proposed, an analysis will be prepared to determine the annual cost for providing Services to such properties. Based on this analysis, any properties to be annexed, pursuant to California Government Code section 53339 et seq. will be assigned to the appropriate existing Tax Zone or to a new Tax Zone with the appropriate Maximum Special Tax rates and will be included in an amended Appendix A.

F. EXEMPTIONS

The Special Tax shall not be levied on Public Property or Property Owner’s Association Property. If any Public Property or Property Owner’s Association Property is converted to Taxable Property as the result of a sale of an Exempt Parcel to a private owner for residential or non-residential development, it shall become subject to the Special Tax in accordance with this Rate and Method of Apportionment as determined pursuant to Sections C. and D.

G. MANNER OF COLLECTION

The Special Tax shall be collected in the same manner and at the same time as ordinary ad valorem property taxes and shall be subject to the same penalties, the same procedure, sale and lien priority in the case of delinquency; provided, however, that the Administrator may directly bill the Special Tax or may collect the Special Tax at a different time or in a different manner if necessary to meet the financial obligations of the CFD,

Page 51 of 58 ends

16.D.

Page 191 of 488 ends

13 and provided further that the CFD may covenant to foreclose and may actually foreclose on Parcels having delinquent Special Taxes as permitted by the Act.

H. APPEALS

Any taxpayer may file a written appeal of the Special Tax on their Parcel(s) with the Administrator, provided that the appellant is current in their payments of Special Taxes.

During pendency of an appeal, all Special Taxes must be paid on or before the payment due date established when the levy was made. The appeal must specify the reasons why the appellant claims the Special Tax is in error. The Administrator shall review the appeal, meet with the appellant if the Administrator deems necessary, and advise the appellant of its determination. If the Administrator agrees with the appellant, the Administrator shall grant a credit to eliminate or reduce future Special Taxes on the appellant’s Parcel(s). No refunds of previously paid Special Taxes shall be made.

The Administrator shall interpret this Rate and Method of Apportionment and make determinations relative to the annual levy and administration of the Special Tax and any taxpayer who appeals, as herein specified.

I. PREPAYMENT

The Special Taxes may not be prepaid.

J. TERM OF THE SPECIAL TAX

Special Tax A shall be levied annually in perpetuity unless terminated earlier by the City.

Special Tax B (Contingent) shall be levied as long as the Contingent Services are being provided.

Page 52 of 58 ends

16.D.

Page 192 of 488 ends

A-1

APPENDIX A

CITY OF HEMET
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2024-01
(PUBLIC FACILITIES MAINTENANCE)

MAXIMUM TAX RATES

Maximum Special Tax Rates for Developed Property
Fiscal Year 2025-2026

Formation/
Annexation
No.

Future
Annexation
Area
Tract/PM__
Single Family Residential
Property RDU $____ per
RDU $____ per RDU
Multifamily Residential
Property RDU $____ per
RDU $____ per RDU
Non-Residential Property Acre $____ per
Acre $____ per Acre

Page 53 of 58 ends

16.D.

Page 193 of 488 ends

City of Hemet
CFD No. 2024-01 (Public Facilities Maintenance)
Rate and Method of Apportionment A-2
Maximum Special Tax Rates for Approved Property
Fiscal Year 2025-2026

Formation/
Annexation
No. Tax
Zone
Tract/Parcel
Map* Land Use Category
Taxable
Unit
Maximum
Special
Tax A Per
Taxable
Unit
Maximum
Special
Tax B Per
Taxable
Unit
Formation 1 PM 14318 Non-Residential Property Acre $2,556.07 $0.00 Formation 2 PM 36566 Non-Residential Property Acre $843.82 $0.00 No. 1 3
SDR 23-002
(National
Tube Supply)
Non-Residential Property Acre $734.11 $0.00
No. 2 4
PM 37779
(Stetson
Corner)
Non-Residential Property Acre $5,581.73 $0.00
No. 3 5
SDR 21-002
(Eggleton
Trucking)
Non-Residential Property Acre $740.00 $0.00
No. 4 6
CUP 22-002
(Newland
Kirby
Warehouse)
Non-Residential Property Acre $677.00 $0.00
Future
Annex
ation
Area
Tract/PM___
Single Family Residential
Property RDU $____ per
RDU
$____ per
RDU
Multifamily Residential
Property RDU $____ per
RDU
$____ per
RDU
Non-Residential Property Acre $____ per
Acre
$____ per
Acre

Page 54 of 58 ends

16.D.

Page 194 of 488 ends

City of Hemet
CFD No. 2024-01 (Public Facilities Maintenance)
Rate and Method of Apportionment A-2
Maximum Special Tax Rates for Undeveloped Property
Fiscal Year 2025-2026

Formation/
Annexation
No. Tax Zone
Tract/Parcel
Map*
Taxable
Unit
Maximum
Special Tax A
Per Taxable
Unit
Maximum
Special Tax B
Per Taxable
Unit
Formation 1 PM 14318 Acre $2,556.07 $0.00
Formation 2 PM 36566 Acre $843.82 $0.00
No. 1 3
SDR 23-002
(National Tube
Supply)
Acre $734.11 $0.00
No. 2 4 PM 37779
(Stetson Corner) Acre $5,581.73 $0.00
No. 3 5
SDR 21-002
(Eggleton
Trucking)
Acre $740.00 $0.00
No. 4 6
CUP 22-002
(Newland Kirby
Warehouse)
Acre $677.00 $0.00

Future
Annexatio
n Area
Tract/PM_____
RDU $____ per RDU $____ per RDU
RDU $____ per RDU $____ per RDU
Acre $____ per Acre $____ per Acre

Maximum Special Tax Rates for Taxable Public Property
and Property Owner’s Association Property
Fiscal Year 2025-2026

The Maximum Special Tax A and Maximum Special Tax B that may be levied for FY 2025-26 on each Parcel of Taxable Public Property or Taxable Property Owners Association Property shall be equal to the product of the applicable Undeveloped Property Maximum Special Tax Rates for each Tax Zone shown in Appendix A multiplied by the Acreage of such Parcel. These Maximum Special Tax Rates are subject to annual escalation in accordance with Section C. 5.

Increase in the Maximum Special Tax A and Special Tax B (Contingent) On each July 1, commencing on July 1, 2026 the Maximum Special Tax A and Maximum Special Tax B for Developed Property, Approved Property, Undeveloped Property and

Page 55 of 58 ends

16.D.

Page 195 of 488 ends

City of Hemet
CFD No. 2024-01 (Public Facilities Maintenance)
Rate and Method of Apportionment A-2
Taxable Public Property and Property Owner’s Association Property for each Tax Zone shall increase by Consumer Price Index Inflation Factor. * The property identified above shall remain part of the identified Tax Zone regardless of changes in the configuration of the parcels in future Fiscal Years. As APNs change, the City may update Appendix A to reflect the most current APNs and Tax Zones consistent with the Taxable Property categories set forth in the Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Tax for CFD No. 2024-1.

Page 56 of 58 ends

16.D.

Page 196 of 488 ends

City of Hemet
CFD No. 2024-01 (Public Facilities Maintenance)
Rate and Method of Apportionment B-1

APPENDIX B

CITY OF HEMET
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2024-01
(PUBLIC FACILITIES MAINTENANCE)

DESCRIPTION OF AUTHORIZED SERVICES

The services which may be funded with proceeds of the special tax of CFD No. 2024-01 (Public Facilities Maintenance) (“CFD 2024-01”), as provided by Section 53313 of the Act, will include all costs attributable to maintaining, servicing, cleaning, repairing and/or replacing facilities (may include reserves for replacement) in public street right-of-way, public lighting, public landscaping, public open spaces and other similar areas officially dedicated for public use. These services including the following:

c) Public street sweeping, on the segments of the arterials within the boundaries of CFD 2024-01; as well as local roads within residential subdivisions located within CFD 2024- 01; and any portions adjacent to the properties within CFD 2024-01; and

The above services may be financed by proceeds of the special tax of CFD 2024-01 only to the extent that they are in addition to those provided in the territory of CFD 2024-01 before CFD 2024- 01 was created or those provided in the territory annexed to CFD 2024-01 before the territory was annexed, as applicable.

Page 57 of 58 ends

16.D.

Page 197 of 488 ends

C-1
EXHIBIT “C”
NAMES OF THE OWNERS AND ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBERS

OF THE REAL PROPERTY WITHIN DISTRICT
ANNEXATION NO. 4 - ZONE 6

Owner Assessor's Parcel Number
Hemet Kirby 456-030-047

Page 58 of 58 ends

16.D.

Page 198 of 488 ends

City of Hemet
City Council Meeting

STAFF REPORT

Meeting: City Council Meeting - Jan 13 2026
Department: Public Works
Submitted by: Mark Prestwich, City Manager
Noah Rau, Public Works Director/City Engineer;

☐ Receive and File ☒ Consent Calendar ☐ Business Item ☐ Public Hearing

TITLE:

A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hemet, California, Approving the Annexation of the Quick Quack Car Wash Project (SDR 22-013) to the City of Hemet Community Facilities District No. 2024-01 (Public Facilities Maintenance) as Zone 7

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

It is respectfully recommended that the City Council:

Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hemet, California, Approving the Annexation of the Quick Quack Car Wash Project (SDR 22-013) to the City of Hemet Community Facilities District No. 2024-01 (Public Facilities Maintenance) as Zone 7.

BACKGROUND:

On September 10, 2024, the City adopted Resolution No. 2024-169 declaring its intention to establish Community Facilities District No. 2024-01 (Public Facilities Maintenance) (the “District” or “CFD 2024- 01”) and Future Annexation Area for maintenance of public facilities. On October 22, 2024, the City adopted Resolution No. 2024-191 (the “Resolution of Formation”) forming CFD No. 2024-01 pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (State of California Government Code Section 5311 et seq.) (the “Act”). The formation process also included the designation of a Future Annexation Area to allow future developments to be annexed into the CFD, with unanimous approval from 100% of the property owners, via a single City Council meeting action.

The annexation process for projects within the future annexation area is streamlined by receiving a petition and waiver from the property owner(s), the City Council approving the Annexation Boundary Map by resolution, followed by the recording of the Annexation Boundary Map and Amended Notice of Special Tax Lien by the City Clerk.

Adoption of the attached Resolution approves Annexation Boundary Map No. 5 for the Quick Quack Car Wash project and directs the City Clerk to execute and record the Map and Notice of Amended Special Tax Lien for the project.

Page 1 of 57 ends

16.E.

Page 199 of 488 ends

The owners/developers, Hemet Quack 22, requested that the City assist them in annexing their development into CFD 2024-01 as Annexation No. 5 to cover the costs associated with the maintenance of public improvements within the proposed commercial project area, which will become Zone 7 (SDR 22-013) (“Zone 7”) of the CFD. Zone 7 was created in order to fund the ongoing maintenance of the following items authorized by CFD 2024-01 (Public Facilities Maintenance) Rate & Method of Apportionment:

 Lighting: Maintenance of street lights and other lighting of parks, parkways, streets, roads, and open space, including, without limitation, furnishing of electrical power to street lights; repair and replacement of damaged or inoperative light bulbs, fixtures, and standards.

 Landscaping and Irrigation: Maintenance of landscape vegetation situated on or adjacent to parks, parkways, streets, roads, and open space, including maintenance and repair of irrigation facilities, parks, parkways, streets, roads, and open space, including maintenance and repair of irrigation facilities.

 All other related services necessary or useful for, or in connection with, the authorized services listed above, including building a reserve fund for replacement; and listed above, including building a reserve fund for replacement; and

 Levy and collect the special tax to fund these services.

ANALYSIS:

Approval of the attached Resolution is required under the Act to levy a special tax and fund services.

The attached Resolution declares the City Council's intention to annex the development to the CFD and to authorize the levy of a special tax in accordance with the attached Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Tax. The attached Resolution is the only step required to annex the development into the CFD pursuant to the procedures prescribed by the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (the "Act").

Annexation No. 5 - Special Tax Zone 7 will have a Maximum Special Tax of $6,639.00 per acre (FY 2025-26) for Non-Residential property. The Maximum Special Tax rates shall increase annually based on the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index each March, with a maximum annual increase of 6% and a minimum annual increase of 2%.

PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION:

On August 23, 2005, the City Council considered and approved goals and policies concerning Community Facility Districts.

On October 22, 2024, the City Council adopted Resolution 2024-191, Resolution of Formation to establish City of Hemet Community Facilities District No. 2024-01 (Public Facilities Maintenance).

STRATEGIC PLAN INTEGRATION:

Page 2 of 57 ends

16.E.

Page 200 of 488 ends

GOAL ONE: QUALITY OF LIFE:

To ensure that Hemet is safe, clean, attractive and comfortable for all who live, work, and visit.

Objective 1: Enhance the visual appearance of the community to make it attractive and reduce blight.

Objective 2: Explore and implement homelessness solutions for the City of Hemet.

Objective 3: Increase Public Safety visibility and response.

GOAL FIVE: ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS
To identify the work needed inside the City organization to effectively provide services to the community and ensure financial stability.

Objective 1: Operate in a financially sustainable manner.

Objective 2: Evaluate existing practices to ensure continuity with industry best practices.

Objective 3: Provide Council with policies that are consistent while lessening liabilities.

Objective 4: Increase employee retention by training and creating a positive workplace.

Objective 5: Streamline fire prevention coordination efforts.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The property owners have filed a petition representing their willingness to move forward and have submitted a deposit to pay for the City's costs incurred in connection with Annexation No. 5 (Zone 7).

After Annexation No. 5, an Amended Notice of Special Tax Lien will be recorded on the property within Annexation No. 5 (Zone 7), and the individual property owners will be responsible for the annual payments of the special taxes. The City will file the annual special tax to be collected with the County Auditor-Controller for placement on the property tax bills.

The City’s annual cost to administer Annexation No. 5 (Zone 7) of CFD 2024-01 will be reimbursed through the special taxes charged to the property owners. The revenue from the special tax will be deposited into a fund for CFD 2024-01 and will be used to pay said administrative expenses and for the maintenance services listed above.

Parcels in Annexation No. 5 (Zone 7) will not be taxed for fiscal year 2025-2026; therefore, it is expected that neither the revenues nor the expenses will be part of the City’s fiscal year 2025-2026 adopted budget. There is no anticipated impact to the General Fund in fiscal year 2025-2026.

Approval of the actions outlined in this staff report does not in any way commit the City to any financial contribution or liability by CFD 2024-01.

ALTERNATIVE(S):

1. Do not adopt the Resolution Approving the Annexation No. 5 (Zone 7), Quick Quack Car Wash project – (SDR 22-013) to the City of Hemet Community Facilities District No. 2024-01 (Public Facilities Maintenance).

2. Provide alternate direction to the City Manager.

ATTACHMENT(S):

Attachment 1 - Resolution Approving Annexation Zone 7
Attachment 2 - Annexation 5_Boundary Map_ Reso Exhibit A Attachment 3 - Waiver Unanimous Approval of Annexation No5 (Zone 7) Attachment 4 - Fifth Amended Notice of Special Tax Lien

Page 3 of 57 ends

16.E.

Page 201 of 488 ends

CITY OF HEMET

HEMET, CALIFORNIA
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XXX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF HEMET, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE

ANNEXATION OF THE QUICK QUACK CAR WASH
PROJECT (SDR 22-013) TO THE CITY OF HEMET
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2024-01
(PUBLIC FACILITIES MAINTENANCE) AS ZONE 7
The City Council of the City of Hemet (hereafter referred to as the “City Council”) does resolve as follows:

WHEREAS, the Conditions of Approval for the Quick Quack Car Wash project (SDR 22-013) require the property owner/applicant to participate in the provision of funding to provide maintenance of all new public improvements associated with the project; and
WHEREAS, on September 10, 2024, the City adopted Resolution No. 2024- 169 declaring its intention to establish Community Facilities District No. 2024-01 (Public Facilities Maintenance) (the “District” or “CFD 2024-01”) and Future Annexation Area for maintenance of public facilities. On October 22, 2024, the City adopted Resolution No. 2024-191 (the “Resolution of Formation”) forming CFD No. 2024-01 pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (State of California Government Code Section 5311 et seq.) (the “Act”); and WHEREAS, the action defining the Future Annexation Area for the District provided for a more efficient process for the annexation of property when the property owners have provided for their unanimous consent such that the annexation process for projects within the Future Annexation Area has been reduced to receiving a petition, consent and waiver from the property owner.

Page 4 of 57 ends

16.E.

Page 202 of 488 ends

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTUION NO. 2026-xxx
Annexation No. 5 (Zone 7) Community Facilities District 2024-01 (Public Facilities Maintenance) WHEREAS, in December 2025, the property owner executed a unanimous approval form which irrevocably consents to and votes in favor of the annexation of property to the District and the levy of the special tax on the property to finance the services of the CFD in accordance with the Rate and Method of the District; and WHEREAS, in the case of annexation proceedings, pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Section 3110.5 a separate map of the area proposed to be annexed is required to be prepared and adopted; and
WHEREAS, City staff has caused to be prepared Annexation No. 5 Boundary Map for a property known as the Quick Quack Car Wash project (SDR 22-013) and defined as Zone 7 of the District, Exhibit A attached hereto, for the annexation of the property to CFD No. 2024-01 (Public Facilities Maintenance).

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HEMET DOES HEREBY FIND AND RESOLVE TO:

SECTION 1.RECITALS - The Council so finds and determines the above recitals are true and correct.

SECTION 2.APPROVE BOUNDARY MAP - Council approves Annexation No. 5 Boundary Map and finds and determines that the Territory shown in the Annexation No. 5 Boundary Map (“Territory”) is hereby added to and made a part of the District with full legal effect.

SECTION 3.RECORD BOUNDARY MAP - The City Clerk is directed to execute and record Annexation No. 5 Boundary Map in the office of the County Recorder of Riverside County no later than 15 days after the adoption of this Resolution.

SECTION 4.NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN - The City Clerk is directed to execute and record a Notice of Special Tax Lien, Exhibit B, in the office of the

Page 5 of 57 ends

16.E.

Page 203 of 488 ends

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 13th day of January, 2026. ____________________________
Linda Krupa, Mayor
ATTEST:
__________________________
John Paul Maier, City Clerk

Page 6 of 57 ends

16.E.

Page 204 of 488 ends

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTUION NO. 2026-xxx
Annexation No. 5 (Zone 7) Community Facilities District 2024-01 (Public Facilities Maintenance) State of California )
County of Riverside )
City of Hemet )
I, John Paul Maier, City Clerk of the City of Hemet, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted by the Hemet City Council on the 13 th day of January, 2026, and was passed by the following vote:

AYES: Council Members:

NOES: Council Members:

ABSTAIN: Council Members:

ABSENT: Council Members:
_____________________________
John Paul Maier, City Clerk

Page 7 of 57 ends

16.E.

Page 205 of 488 ends

Page 8 of 57 ends

16.E.

Page 206 of 488 ends

PROPOSED BOUNDARY OF ANNEXATION NO. 5CITY OF HEMETCOMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2024-01(PUBLIC FACILITIES MAINTENANCE)ZONE 7COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIANNo Scale 2375 Northside Drive Suite 125, San Diego, CA 92108 p: 619.481.5011 www.WeAreHarris.com CLERK'S MAP STATEMENTFILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF HEMET THIS DAY OF , 2026.CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF HEMETCLERK'S MAP STATEMENTI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE AREA SHOWN ON THIS MAP OF THE PROPOSED BOUNDARY OF ANNEXATION NO. 5 TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2024-01 (PUBLIC FACIITIES MAINTENANCE) ZONE 7, CITY OF HEMET, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, WAS APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HEMET AT A REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETING THEREOF, HELD ON THE DAY OF , 2026BY ITS RESOLUTION NO. .CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF HEMETCOUNTY RECORDER'S FILING STATEMENTFILED THIS DAY OF , 2026AT THE HOUR OF O'CLOCK .M. IN BOOK OF MAPS OF ASSESSMENT AND COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICTS PAGE NO. IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER IN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.PETER ALDANACOUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDEBY: DEPUTYFILE:THE LINES AND DIMENSIONS OF EACH LOT OR PARCEL SHOWN ON THIS MAP SHALL BE THOSE LINES AND DIMENSIONS AS SHOWN ON THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY ASSESSOR’S MAPS.

Special Tax BoundaryParcel BoundaryLegendASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER LOCATED WITHIN PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF ANNEXATION NO. 5 TO CFD 2024-01 (PUBLIC FACILITIES MAINTENANCE)ZONE 7 AS OF FISCAL YEAR 2025-26448-250-005 Site

VICINITY MAPNOT TO SCALEW FLORIDA AVESANDERSON AVEW ACCACIA AVEW DEVONSHIRE AVEWARREN RDROSE RDMYERS STN CAWSTON AVEW WHITTIER AVE

Page 9 of 57 ends

16.E.

Page 207 of 488 ends

1 CITY OF HEMET
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2024-01
(PUBLIC FACILITIES MAINTENANCE)
ANNEXATION NO. 5 (ZONE 7) (SDR 22-013)

UNANIMOUS APPROVAL
of Annexation to a Community Facilities District
and Related Matters

To the Honorable City Council,
City of Hemet

Members of the Council:

This constitutes the Unanimous Approval (the "Unanimous Approval”) of Hemet Kirby, the record owner(s) (the "Property Owner”) of the fee title to the real property identified below (the “Property”) contemplated by Section 53339.3 et seq. of the Mello- Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended (the “Act”) to annexation of the Property to the “City of Hemet Community Facilities District No. 2024-01 (Public Facilities Maintenance) (the “CFD”), and it states as follows:

1. Property Owner. This Unanimous Approval is submitted by the Property Owner (whether one or more) identified below as or for the recorded owner(s) of the Property identified below. The Property Owner warrants to the City of Hemet (the “City”) that they are such Property Owner or is legally authorized to execute this Unanimous Approval for and on behalf of such Property Owner.

2. Approval of Annexation. This Unanimous Approval constitutes the unanimous approval and unanimous vote by the Property Owner in favor of the annexation of the Property to the CFD. The CFD was formed to finance the municipal services (the "Services”) described in Exhibit A hereto and made a part hereof.

3. Approval of Special Tax and the Facilities. This Unanimous Approval constitutes the unanimous approval and unanimous vote by the Property Owner in favor of the levy of special taxes (the "Special Taxes”) on the Property to finance the Services according to the Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Taxes for the CFD attached hereto as Exhibit B and made a part hereof (the ”Rate and Method”). Exhibit B describes the maximum special tax rate for the Services.

4. Approval of the Appropriations Limit. This Unanimous Approval constitutes the unanimous approval and unanimous vote by the Property Owner in favor of the appropriations limit established for the CFD.

5. Waivers and Vote. The Property Owner hereby confirms that this Unanimous Approval constitutes its approval and unanimous vote as described herein and as contemplated by Section 53339.3 et seq. of the Act and Article XIIIA of the California Constitution. The Property Owner hereby waives all other rights

Page 10 of 57 ends

16.E.

Page 208 of 488 ends

2 with respect to the annexation of the Property, the levy of the Special Taxes on the Property and the other matters covered in this Unanimous Approval. 6. Recordation of Amendment to Notice of Special Tax Lien. The original Notice of Special Tax Lien for the CFD was heretofore recorded November 12, 2024 as Instrument No. 2024-0344328, in the office of the County Recorder for the County of Riverside, State of California, which contains a list of the then existing owners and assessor tax parcel numbers in the District. The First Amended Notice of Special Tax Lien with respect to the CFD was recorded on July 3, 2025, as Document No. 2025-0205481, in the office of the County Clerk & Recorder of the County of Riverside, California, which contains a list of the then existing owners and assessor parcel numbers within the boundaries of Annexation No. 1 (Zone 3) of the CFD. The Second Amended Notice of Special Tax Lien with respect to the CFD was recorded on July 10, 2025, as Document No. 2025-0211669, in the office of the County Clerk & Recorder of the County of Riverside, California, which contains a list of the then existing owners and assessor parcel numbers within the boundaries of Annexation No. 2 (Zone 4) of the CFD. The Third Amended Notice of Special Tax Lien with respect to the CFD was recorded on August 21, 2025, as Document No. 2025-0258339, in the office of the County Clerk & Recorder of the County of Riverside, California, which contains a list of the then existing owners and assessor parcel numbers within the boundaries of Annexation No. 3 (Zone 5) of the CFD. The Fourth Amended Notice of Special Tax Lien with respect to the CFD was recorded on __________, 2026, as Document No. 2026-________, in the office of the County Clerk & Recorder of the County of Riverside, California, which contains a list of the then existing owners and assessor parcel numbers within the boundaries of Annexation No. 4 (Zone 6) of the CFD. The Property Owner hereby authorizes and directs the City Clerk to execute and cause to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of the County of Riverside an amendment to the Notice of Special Tax Lien for the CFD as required by Section 3117.5 of the California Streets and Highways Code. The amendment to the Notice of Special Tax Lien shall include the Rate and Method as an exhibit thereto. 7. City Warranted. The Property Owner warrants to the City that the presentation of this Unanimous Approval, any votes, consents or waivers contained herein, and other actions mandated by the City for the annexation of the Property to the CFD shall not constitute or be construed as events of default or delinquencies under any existing or proposed financing documents entered into or to be entered into by the Property Owner for the Property, including any “due-on-encumbrance" clauses under any existing security instruments secured

Page 11 of 57 ends

16.E.

Page 209 of 488 ends

3 by the Property. If requested by the City, the Property Owner agrees, at its own expense, to supply to the City, current title evidence so that the City may verify ownership for the annexation to the CFD. 8. Due Diligence and Disclosures. The Property Owner agrees to cooperate with the City and its attorneys and consultants and to provide all information and disclosures required by the City about the Special Taxes to purchasers of the Property or any part of it.

9. Agreements. The Property Owner further agrees to execute such additional or supplemental agreements as may be required by the City to provide for any of the actions and conditions described in this Unanimous Approval, including any cash deposit required to pay for the City’s costs in annexing the Property to the CFD. 10. The Property: The Property is identified as follows:

The property consists of a total of 1.59 gross acres

By executing this Unanimous Approval, the Property Owner agrees to all of the above.

Property Owner:

Hemet Kirby
By: Hemet Quack 22 – its owner or authorized representative

By:

Printed Name & Signature

Date:

Assessor Parcel Number Gross Acres Owner 448-250-005 1.59 Hemet Quack 22

Page 12 of 57 ends

16.E.

Page 210 of 488 ends

A-1

EXHIBIT A

COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISRTICT 2024-01 (PUBLIC FACILITIES MAINTENANCE)

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES

b) Maintenance and operation of water quality improvements which include storm drainage and flood protection facilities, including, without limitation, drainage inlets, catch basin inserts, fossil fuel filters, infiltration basins, flood control channels and similar facilities. Maintenance services may include but is not limited to the repair, removal or replacement of all or part of any of the water quality improvements, fossil fuel filters within the public right-of-way including the removal of petroleum hydrocarbons and other pollutants from water runoff, or appurtenant facilities, clearing of inlets and outlets; erosion repairs; and cleanup to improvements, and other items necessary for the maintenance and servicing of the water quality basin improvements and flood control channel improvements; and

c) Public street sweeping, on the segments of the arterials within the boundaries of CFD 2024-01; as well as local roads within residential subdivisions located within CFD 2024-01; and any portions adjacent to the properties within CFD 2024-01; and

d) In addition to payment of the cost and expense of the forgoing services, proceeds of the special tax may be expended to pay “Administrative Expenses,” as said term is defined in the Rate and Method of Apportionment.

Page 13 of 57 ends

16.E.

Page 211 of 488 ends

B-1

EXHIBIT B

COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISRTICT 2024-01 (PUBLIC FACILITIES MAINTENANCE) ANNEXATION NO. 5 – ZONE 7 (SDR 22-013)

RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT SPECIAL TAX

Page 14 of 57 ends

16.E.

Page 212 of 488 ends

1 RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAX FOR
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2024-01
(PUBLIC FACILITIES MAINTENANCE)

OF THE CITY OF HEMET, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA

A. DEFINITIONS

The terms hereinafter set forth have the following meanings:

“Accessory Dwelling Unit(s)” means a secondary attached or detached dwelling unit with complete independent living facilities for one or more persons.

“Administrator” means a person or firm designated by the CFD to administer the Special Tax.

“Approved Property” means all Parcels of Taxable Property: (i) that are included in a Final Map that was recorded prior to January 1st preceding the Fiscal Year in which the

Page 15 of 57 ends

16.E.

Page 213 of 488 ends

2 Special Tax is being levied; and (ii) that have not been issued a Building Permit prior to the April 1st preceding the Fiscal Year in which the Special Tax is being levied.

“Assessor” means the Assessor of the County.

“Assessor’s Parcel Map” means an official map of the County Assessor of the County designating Parcels by Assessor’s Parcel Number.

“Assessor’s Parcel Number” or “APN” means the number assigned to a lot or Parcel for purposes of identification as determined from an Assessor Parcel Map or the applicable assessment roll.

"Building Permit" means the first legal document issued by a local agency giving official permission for new construction.

“Capital Replacement” means to repair or replace improvements being maintained by the CFD.

“CFD” or “CFD 2024-01” means Community Facilities District No. 2024-01 (Public Facilities Maintenance) of the City of Hemet.

“City” means the City of Hemet, California

Page 16 of 57 ends

16.E.

Page 214 of 488 ends

3 “Consumer Price Index” or “CPI” means the Consumer Price Index published by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistic for “All Urban Consumers” in the Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario area.

“Council” means the City Council of the City acting as the legislative body of the CFD.

“County” means the County of Riverside, California.

“Exempt Property” means any Parcel that is exempt from Special Taxes pursuant to Section F., below.

“Fiscal Year” means the 12-month period starting on July 1 of any calendar year and ending the following June 30.

Page 17 of 57 ends

16.E.

Page 215 of 488 ends

“Land Use Class” or “LUC” means any of the classes listed in Table 1 or Table 2 of Section C. or Appendix A, below.

“Maximum Special Tax” means either Maximum Special Tax A and/or Maximum Special Tax B (Contingent), as applicable.

“Maximum Special Tax Rate (s)” means, for each Fiscal Year, the greatest Special Tax rate, determined in accordance with Section C., below, that may be levied on a Parcel in such Fiscal Year.

“Mixed Use Property” means all Parcels of Developed Property with more than one land use including residential, commercial, retail or other land uses.

Page 18 of 57 ends

16.E.

Page 216 of 488 ends

“Residential Dwelling Unit” or "RDU" means a residential unit that is used or intended to be used as a domicile by one or more persons, as determined by the Administrator.

“Residential Property” means all Parcels of Developed Property for which a Building Permit has been issued permitting the construction of one or more Residential Dwelling Units.

“Special Tax(es)” means the Special Tax A or Special Tax B (Contingent) to be levied in each Fiscal Year on each Parcel of Taxable Property in accordance with Section D.

“Special Tax A” means the special tax to be levied in each Fiscal Year on each Parcel of Taxable Property in accordance with Section D.1 to fund the Special Tax A Requirement.

Page 19 of 57 ends

16.E.

Page 217 of 488 ends

“Special Tax A Reserve Fund” means a fund to be used for Capital Replacement and Operating Reserves related to the Special Tax A Services.

“Special Tax B (Contingent) Improvements” means the improvements that are maintained and operated as described in Special Tax B Services.

Page 20 of 57 ends

16.E.

Page 218 of 488 ends

“Special Tax B (Contingent) Reserve Fund” means a fund to be used for Capital Replacement and Operating Reserves related to the Special Tax B Services.

“State” means the State of California.

“Taxable Unit” means either a RDU, BSF or an Acre, as shown in Table 1 or Table 2 of Section C.

“Undeveloped Property” means all Parcels of Taxable Property not classified as Developed Property, Approved Property, Public Property, or Property Owner’s Association Property.

B. ASSIGNMENT TO LAND USE CLASS

Page 21 of 57 ends

16.E.

Page 219 of 488 ends

C. MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX RATES

For each Fiscal Year commencing Fiscal Year 2024-2025, Maximum Special Tax Rates shall be determined as described below:

1. Developed Property

The Maximum Special Tax A and Maximum Special Tax B for each Assessor’s Parcel of Developed Property shall be specific to each Tax Zone within the CFD.

Page 22 of 57 ends

16.E.

Page 220 of 488 ends

9 TABLE 1
Maximum Special Tax Rates for Developed Property
Fiscal Year 2024-2025

Mixed Use Property

2. Approved Property

Page 23 of 57 ends

16.E.

Page 221 of 488 ends

10 3. Undeveloped Property

TABLE 2
Maximum Special Tax Rates for Undeveloped Property
Fiscal Year 2024-2025

5. Increase in the Maximum Special Tax A and Maximum Special Tax B (Contingent)

Page 24 of 57 ends

16.E.

Page 222 of 488 ends

11 D. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF THE SPECIAL TAX

1. Special Tax A

2. Special Tax B (Contingent)

Page 25 of 57 ends

16.E.

Page 223 of 488 ends

E. FUTURE ANNEXATIONS

F. EXEMPTIONS

G. MANNER OF COLLECTION

Page 26 of 57 ends

16.E.

Page 224 of 488 ends

13 and provided further that the CFD may covenant to foreclose and may actually foreclose on Parcels having delinquent Special Taxes as permitted by the Act.

H. APPEALS

Any taxpayer may file a written appeal of the Special Tax on their Parcel(s) with the Administrator, provided that the appellant is current in their payments of Special Taxes.

I. PREPAYMENT

The Special Taxes may not be prepaid.

J. TERM OF THE SPECIAL TAX

Special Tax A shall be levied annually in perpetuity unless terminated earlier by the City.

Special Tax B (Contingent) shall be levied as long as the Contingent Services are being provided.

Page 27 of 57 ends

16.E.

Page 225 of 488 ends

A-1

APPENDIX A

CITY OF HEMET
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2024-01
(PUBLIC FACILITIES MAINTENANCE)

MAXIMUM TAX RATES
Maximum Special Tax Rates for Developed Property
Fiscal Year 2025-2026
Formation/
Annexation
No.

Tax Zone
Tract/Parcel
Map* Land Use Category
Taxable
Unit
Maximum
Special
Tax A Per
Taxable
Unit
Maximum
Special Tax B
Per Taxable
Unit
Formation 1 PM 14318 Non-Residential Property Acre $2,556.07 $0.00 Formation 2 PM 36566 Non-Residential Property Acre $843.82 $0.00 No. 1 3
SDR 23-002
(National
Tube Supply)
Non-Residential Property Acre $734.11 $0.00
No. 2 4
PM 37779
(Stetson
Corner)
Non-Residential Property Acre $5,581.73 $0.00
No. 3 5
SDR 21-002
(Eggleton
Trucking)
Non-Residential Property Acre $740.00 $0.00
No. 4 6
CUP 22-002
(Newland
Kirby
Warehouse)
Non-Residential Property Acre $677.00 $0.00
No. 5 7
SDR 22-013
(Quick Quack
Car Wash)
Non-Residential Property Acre $6,639.00 $0.00
Future
Annexation
Area
Tract/PM___
Single Family Residential
Property RDU $____ per
RDU $____ per RDU
Multifamily Residential
Property RDU $____ per
RDU $____ per RDU
Non-Residential Property Acre $____ per
Acre $____ per Acre

Page 28 of 57 ends

16.E.

Page 226 of 488 ends

City of Hemet
CFD No. 2024-01 (Public Facilities Maintenance)
Rate and Method of Apportionment A-2
Maximum Special Tax Rates for Approved Property
Fiscal Year 2025-2026
Formation/
Annexation
No. Tax
Zone
Tract/Parcel
Map* Land Use Category
Taxable
Unit
Maximum
Special
Tax A Per
Taxable
Unit
Maximum
Special
Tax B Per
Taxable
Unit
Formation 1 PM 14318 Non-Residential Property Acre $2,556.07 $0.00 Formation 2 PM 36566 Non-Residential Property Acre $843.82 $0.00 No. 1 3
SDR 23-002
(National
Tube Supply)
Non-Residential Property Acre $734.11 $0.00
No. 2 4
PM 37779
(Stetson
Corner)
Non-Residential Property Acre $5,581.73 $0.00
No. 3 5
SDR 21-002
(Eggleton
Trucking)
Non-Residential Property Acre $740.00 $0.00
No. 4 6
CUP 22-002
(Newland
Kirby
Warehouse)
Non-Residential Property Acre $677.00 $0.00
No. 5 7
SDR 22-013
(Quick Quack
Car Wash)
Non-Residential Property Acre $6,639.00 $0.00
Future
Annex
ation
Area
Tract/PM___
Single Family Residential
Property RDU $____ per
RDU
$____ per
RDU
Multifamily Residential
Property RDU $____ per
RDU
$____ per
RDU
Non-Residential Property Acre $____ per
Acre
$____ per
Acre

Page 29 of 57 ends

16.E.

Page 227 of 488 ends

City of Hemet
CFD No. 2024-01 (Public Facilities Maintenance)
Rate and Method of Apportionment A-2
Maximum Special Tax Rates for Undeveloped Property
Fiscal Year 2025-2026
Formation/
Annexation
No. Tax Zone
Tract/Parcel
Map* Taxable Unit
Maximum
Special Tax
A Per
Taxable Unit
Maximum
Special Tax
B Per
Taxable Unit
Formation 1 PM 14318 Acre $2,556.07 $0.00
Formation 2 PM 36566 Acre $843.82 $0.00
No. 1 3
SDR 23-002
(National Tube
Supply)
Acre $734.11 $0.00
No. 2 4 PM 37779
(Stetson Corner) Acre $5,581.73 $0.00
No. 3 5
SDR 21-002
(Eggleton
Trucking)
Acre $740.00 $0.00
No. 4 6
CUP 22-002
(Newland Kirby
Warehouse)
Acre $677.00 $0.00
No. 5 7
SDR 22-013
(Quick Quack
Car Wash)
Acre $6,639.00 $0.00
Future
Annexatio
n Area
Tract/PM_____
RDU $____ per
RDU
$____ per
RDU
RDU $____ per
RDU
$____ per
RDU
Acre $____ per
Acre
$____ per
Acre
Maximum Special Tax Rates for Taxable Public Property
and Property Owner’s Association Property
Fiscal Year 2025-2026
The Maximum Special Tax A and Maximum Special Tax B that may be levied for FY 2025-26 on each Parcel of Taxable Public Property or Taxable Property Owners Association Property shall be equal to the product of the applicable Undeveloped Property Maximum Special Tax Rates for each Tax Zone shown in Appendix A multiplied by the Acreage of such Parcel. These Maximum Special Tax Rates are subject to annual escalation in accordance with Section C. 5.

Page 30 of 57 ends

16.E.

Page 228 of 488 ends

City of Hemet
CFD No. 2024-01 (Public Facilities Maintenance)
Rate and Method of Apportionment A-2
Increase in the Maximum Special Tax A and Special Tax B (Contingent) On each July 1, commencing on July 1, 2026 the Maximum Special Tax A and Maximum Special Tax B for Developed Property, Approved Property, Undeveloped Property and Taxable Public Property and Property Owner’s Association Property for each Tax Zone shall increase by Consumer Price Index Inflation Factor. * The property identified above shall remain part of the identified Tax Zone regardless of changes in the configuration of the parcels in future Fiscal Years. As APNs change, the City may update Appendix A to reflect the most current APNs and Tax Zones consistent with the Taxable Property categories set forth in the Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Tax for CFD No. 2024-1.

Page 31 of 57 ends

16.E.

Page 229 of 488 ends

City of Hemet
CFD No. 2024-01 (Public Facilities Maintenance)
Rate and Method of Apportionment B-1

APPENDIX B

CITY OF HEMET
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2024-01
(PUBLIC FACILITIES MAINTENANCE)

DESCRIPTION OF AUTHORIZED SERVICES

c) Public street sweeping, on the segments of the arterials within the boundaries of CFD 2024-01; as well as local roads within residential subdivisions located within CFD 2024- 01; and any portions adjacent to the properties within CFD 2024-01; and

Page 32 of 57 ends

16.E.

Page 230 of 488 ends

1 RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND
WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO:

CITY OF HEMET
445 E. Florida Ave.

Hemet, CA 92543
Attention: City Clerk

FIFTH AMENDED NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN

CITY OF HEMET COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2024-01 (PUBLIC FACILITIES MAINTENANCE)

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 3114.5 of the California Streets and Highways Code and the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (California Government Code section 53311 et seq.), as amended, (the “Act”) specifically Section 53328.3 of the Act, the undersigned City Clerk of the City of Hemet, County of Riverside, State of California, hereby gives notice (the “Notice”) of the foregoing and that a lien to secure payment of a special tax is hereby imposed by the City Council of the City of Hemet, County of Riverside, State of California. The special tax secured by this lien is authorized to be levied for the purpose of providing the services, including incidental expenses, described in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated by this reference herein.

The special tax is authorized to be levied within the area of Annexation No. 5 (Zone 7) Boundary Map (“Annexed Area”) of the City of Hemet Community Facilities District No. 2024- 01 (Public Facilities Maintenance) (the “District”), which has now been officially annexed to the District and the lien of special tax is a continuing lien which shall secure each annual levy of the special tax and which shall continue in force and effect until the special tax ceases to be levied and a notice of cessation of special tax is recorded in accordance with the Section 53330.5 of the Act.

The rate, method of apportionment, and manner of collection of the authorized special tax is as set forth in the rate and method of apportionment of the special tax (the “Rate and Method”) attached hereto as Exhibit “B” and by this reference incorporated herein. The Rate and Method does not provide for prepayment of the special tax obligation.

Notice is further given that upon the recording of this Notice in the office of the County Recorder of the County of Riverside, the obligation to pay the special tax levy shall become a lien upon all nonexempt real property within the District, including the area of all current and prior annexations, in accordance with Section 3115.5 of the California Streets and Highways Code.

The names of the owners and the assessor’s parcel numbers of the real property included within the Annexed Area are as set forth in Exhibit “C” attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof.

This Fifth Amended Notice of Special Tax Lien amends the Fourth Amended Notice of Special Tax Lien with respect to the District recorded on _______, 2025, as Document No. 2026-

Page 33 of 57 ends

16.E.

Page 231 of 488 ends

2 ___________, in the office of the County Clerk & Recorder of the County of Riverside, California, which contains a list of the then existing owners and assessor parcel numbers within the boundaries of Annexation No. 4 (Zone 6) of the District.

The original Notice of Special Tax Lien with respect to the District was recorded on November 12, 2024, as Document No. 2024-0344328, in the office of the County Clerk & Recorder of the County of Riverside, California, which contains a list of the then existing owners and assessor parcel numbers of the original boundaries of the District.

The First Amended Notice of Special Tax Lien with respect to the District was recorded on July 3, 2025, as Document No. 2025-0205481, in the office of the County Clerk & Recorder of the County of Riverside, California, which contains a list of the then existing owners and assessor parcel numbers within the boundaries of Annexation No. 1 (Zone 3) of the District.

The Second Amended Notice of Special Tax Lien with respect to the District was recorded on July 10, 2025, as Document No. 2025-0211669, in the office of the County Clerk & Recorder of the County of Riverside, California, which contains a list of the then existing owners and assessor parcel numbers within the boundaries of Annexation No. 2 (Zone 4) of the District.

The Third Amended Notice of Special Tax Lien with respect to the District was recorded on August 21, 2025, as Document No. 2025-0258339, in the office of the County Clerk & Recorder of the County of Riverside, California, which contains a list of the then existing owners and assessor parcel numbers within the boundaries of Annexation No. 3 (Zone 5) of the District.

The Fourth Amended Notice of Special Tax Lien with respect to the District was recorded on , 2026, as Document No. 2026-______, in the office of the County Clerk & Recorder of the County of Riverside, California, which contains a list of the then existing owners and assessor parcel numbers within the boundaries of Annexation No. 4 (Zone 7) of the District.

Reference is made to the initial formation of CFD 2024-01 (Public Facilities Maintenance) boundary map - Zone 1 of the District recorded in Book 94 of Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities Districts on September 13, 2024, at Page 12 in the office of the County Recorder for the County of Riverside, State of California, as Document No. 2024-0277132 which map is the final boundary map of Zone 1 in the District.

Reference is made to the initial formation of CFD 2024-01 (Public Facilities Maintenance) boundary map - Zone 2 of the District recorded in Book 94 of Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities Districts on September 13, 2024, at Page 11 in the office of the County Recorder for the County of Riverside, State of California, as Document No. 2024-0277131 which map is the final boundary map of Zone 2 in the District.

Reference is made to the boundary map of Future Annexation Area into the District recorded in Book 94 of Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities Districts on September 13, 2024, at Page 13 in the office of the County Recorder for the County of Riverside, State of California, as Document No. 2024-0277133 which map is the final boundary map of Future Annexation Area in the District.

Page 34 of 57 ends

16.E.

Page 232 of 488 ends

3 Reference is made to the boundary map of Annexation No. 1 (Zone 3) into the District recorded in Book 95 of Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities Districts on January 28, 2025, at Page 15 in the office of the County Recorder for the County of Riverside, State of California, as Document No. 2025-0027472.

Reference is made to the boundary map of Annexation No. 2 (Zone 4) into the District recorded in Book 96 of Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities Districts on June 25, 2025, at Page 63 in the office of the County Recorder for the County of Riverside, State of California, as Document No. 2025-0190246.

Reference is made to the boundary map of Annexation No. 5 (Zone 7) into the District recorded in Book ____ of Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities Districts on _____, 2025, at Page _____in the office of the County Recorder for the County of Riverside, State of California, as Document No. 2025- .

Dated: _______________, 2026
By: __________________________
John Paul Maier
City Clerk
City of Hemet

Page 35 of 57 ends

16.E.

Page 233 of 488 ends

A-1
EXHIBIT “A”

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES
The services which may be funded with proceeds of the special tax of CFD No. 2024-01 (Public Facilities Maintenance) (“CFD 2024-01”), as provided by Section 53313 of the Act, will include all costs attributable to maintaining, servicing, cleaning, repairing and/or replacing facilities (may include reserves for replacement) in public street right-of-way, public lighting, public landscaping, public open spaces and other similar areas officially dedicated for public use. These services including the following:
a) Maintenance and lighting of parks, parkways, streets, roads and open space, which maintenance and lighting services may include, without limitation, furnishing of electrical power to street lights; repair and replacement of damaged or inoperative light bulbs, fixtures and standards; maintenance of streets and roadways including slurry seal, asphalt overly and other similar maintenance; maintenance (including irrigation and replacement) of landscaping vegetation situated on or adjacent to parks, parkways, streets, roads and open space; maintenance and repair of irrigation facilities; maintenance of public signage; graffiti removal from and maintenance and repair of public structures situated on parks, parkways, streets, roads and open space; maintenance and repair of playground or recreation program equipment or facilities situated on any park; and b) Maintenance and operation of water quality improvements which include storm drainage and flood protection facilities, including, without limitation, drainage inlets, catch basin inserts, fossil fuel filters, infiltration basins, flood control channels and similar facilities.

Maintenance services may include but is not limited to the repair, removal or replacement of all or part of any of the water quality improvements, fossil fuel filters within the public right-of-way including the removal of petroleum hydrocarbons and other pollutants from water runoff, or appurtenant facilities, clearing of inlets and outlets; erosion repairs; and cleanup to improvements, and other items necessary for the maintenance and servicing of the water quality basin improvements and flood control channel improvements; and c) Public street sweeping, on the segments of the arterials within the boundaries of CFD 2024- 01; as well as local roads within residential subdivisions located within CFD 2024-01; and any portions adjacent to the properties within CFD 2024-01; and In addition to payment of the cost and expense of the forgoing services, proceeds of the special tax may be expended to pay “Administrative Expenses,” as said term is defined in the Rate and Method of Apportionment as well as the “Incidental Expenses”, as defined in the Resolution of Intention, as follows:

Page 36 of 57 ends

16.E.

Page 234 of 488 ends

A-2

INCIDENTAL EXPENSES

The following incidental expenses are examples of those that may be incurred in the formation of the District:

• Engineering services,

• Publishing, mailing and posting of notices,

• Governmental notification and filing costs,

• Election costs, and

• Charges and fees of the City other than those waived.

The following incidental expenses are examples of those that may be incurred in each annual Special Tax levy:

• Necessary consultant costs,

• Costs of posting and collecting the special taxes, and

Administrative costs of the City related to each annual Special Tax levy.

Page 37 of 57 ends

16.E.

Page 235 of 488 ends

B-1
EXHIBIT “B”

RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAX FOR
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2024-01
(PUBLIC FACILITIES MAINTENANCE)

OF THE CITY OF HEMET, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Page 38 of 57 ends

16.E.

Page 236 of 488 ends

1 RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAX FOR
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2024-01
(PUBLIC FACILITIES MAINTENANCE)

OF THE CITY OF HEMET, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA

A. DEFINITIONS

The terms hereinafter set forth have the following meanings:

“Accessory Dwelling Unit(s)” means a secondary attached or detached dwelling unit with complete independent living facilities for one or more persons.

“Administrator” means a person or firm designated by the CFD to administer the Special Tax.

“Approved Property” means all Parcels of Taxable Property: (i) that are included in a Final Map that was recorded prior to January 1st preceding the Fiscal Year in which the

Page 39 of 57 ends

16.E.

Page 237 of 488 ends

2 Special Tax is being levied; and (ii) that have not been issued a Building Permit prior to the April 1st preceding the Fiscal Year in which the Special Tax is being levied.

“Assessor” means the Assessor of the County.

“Assessor’s Parcel Map” means an official map of the County Assessor of the County designating Parcels by Assessor’s Parcel Number.

“Assessor’s Parcel Number” or “APN” means the number assigned to a lot or Parcel for purposes of identification as determined from an Assessor Parcel Map or the applicable assessment roll.

"Building Permit" means the first legal document issued by a local agency giving official permission for new construction.

“Capital Replacement” means to repair or replace improvements being maintained by the CFD.

“CFD” or “CFD 2024-01” means Community Facilities District No. 2024-01 (Public Facilities Maintenance) of the City of Hemet.

“City” means the City of Hemet, California

Page 40 of 57 ends

16.E.

Page 238 of 488 ends

3 “Consumer Price Index” or “CPI” means the Consumer Price Index published by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistic for “All Urban Consumers” in the Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario area.

“Council” means the City Council of the City acting as the legislative body of the CFD.

“County” means the County of Riverside, California.

“Exempt Property” means any Parcel that is exempt from Special Taxes pursuant to Section F., below.

“Fiscal Year” means the 12-month period starting on July 1 of any calendar year and ending the following June 30.

Page 41 of 57 ends

16.E.

Page 239 of 488 ends

“Land Use Class” or “LUC” means any of the classes listed in Table 1 or Table 2 of Section C. or Appendix A, below.

“Maximum Special Tax” means either Maximum Special Tax A and/or Maximum Special Tax B (Contingent), as applicable.

“Maximum Special Tax Rate (s)” means, for each Fiscal Year, the greatest Special Tax rate, determined in accordance with Section C., below, that may be levied on a Parcel in such Fiscal Year.

“Mixed Use Property” means all Parcels of Developed Property with more than one land use including residential, commercial, retail or other land uses.

Page 42 of 57 ends

16.E.

Page 240 of 488 ends

“Residential Dwelling Unit” or "RDU" means a residential unit that is used or intended to be used as a domicile by one or more persons, as determined by the Administrator.

“Residential Property” means all Parcels of Developed Property for which a Building Permit has been issued permitting the construction of one or more Residential Dwelling Units.

“Special Tax(es)” means the Special Tax A or Special Tax B (Contingent) to be levied in each Fiscal Year on each Parcel of Taxable Property in accordance with Section D.

“Special Tax A” means the special tax to be levied in each Fiscal Year on each Parcel of Taxable Property in accordance with Section D.1 to fund the Special Tax A Requirement.

Page 43 of 57 ends

16.E.

Page 241 of 488 ends

“Special Tax A Reserve Fund” means a fund to be used for Capital Replacement and Operating Reserves related to the Special Tax A Services.

“Special Tax B (Contingent) Improvements” means the improvements that are maintained and operated as described in Special Tax B Services.

Page 44 of 57 ends

16.E.

Page 242 of 488 ends

“Special Tax B (Contingent) Reserve Fund” means a fund to be used for Capital Replacement and Operating Reserves related to the Special Tax B Services.

“State” means the State of California.

“Taxable Unit” means either a RDU, BSF or an Acre, as shown in Table 1 or Table 2 of Section C.

“Undeveloped Property” means all Parcels of Taxable Property not classified as Developed Property, Approved Property, Public Property, or Property Owner’s Association Property.

B. ASSIGNMENT TO LAND USE CLASS

Page 45 of 57 ends

16.E.

Page 243 of 488 ends

C. MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX RATES

For each Fiscal Year commencing Fiscal Year 2024-2025, Maximum Special Tax Rates shall be determined as described below:

1. Developed Property

The Maximum Special Tax A and Maximum Special Tax B for each Assessor’s Parcel of Developed Property shall be specific to each Tax Zone within the CFD.

Page 46 of 57 ends

16.E.

Page 244 of 488 ends

9 TABLE 1
Maximum Special Tax Rates for Developed Property
Fiscal Year 2024-2025

Mixed Use Property

2. Approved Property

Page 47 of 57 ends

16.E.

Page 245 of 488 ends

10 3. Undeveloped Property

TABLE 2
Maximum Special Tax Rates for Undeveloped Property
Fiscal Year 2024-2025

5. Increase in the Maximum Special Tax A and Maximum Special Tax B (Contingent)

Page 48 of 57 ends

16.E.

Page 246 of 488 ends

11 D. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF THE SPECIAL TAX

1. Special Tax A

2. Special Tax B (Contingent)

Page 49 of 57 ends

16.E.

Page 247 of 488 ends

E. FUTURE ANNEXATIONS

F. EXEMPTIONS

G. MANNER OF COLLECTION

Page 50 of 57 ends

16.E.

Page 248 of 488 ends

13 and provided further that the CFD may covenant to foreclose and may actually foreclose on Parcels having delinquent Special Taxes as permitted by the Act.

H. APPEALS

Any taxpayer may file a written appeal of the Special Tax on their Parcel(s) with the Administrator, provided that the appellant is current in their payments of Special Taxes.

I. PREPAYMENT

The Special Taxes may not be prepaid.

J. TERM OF THE SPECIAL TAX

Special Tax A shall be levied annually in perpetuity unless terminated earlier by the City.

Special Tax B (Contingent) shall be levied as long as the Contingent Services are being provided.

Page 51 of 57 ends

16.E.

Page 249 of 488 ends

A-1

APPENDIX A

CITY OF HEMET
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2024-01
(PUBLIC FACILITIES MAINTENANCE)

MAXIMUM TAX RATES

Maximum Special Tax Rates for Developed Property
Fiscal Year 2025-2026

Formation/
Annexation
No.

Future
Annexation
Area
Tract/PM___
Single Family Residential
Property RDU $____ per
RDU $____ per RDU
Multifamily Residential
Property RDU $____ per
RDU $____ per RDU
Non-Residential Property Acre $____ per
Acre $____ per Acre

Page 52 of 57 ends

16.E.

Page 250 of 488 ends

City of Hemet
CFD No. 2024-01 (Public Facilities Maintenance)
Rate and Method of Apportionment A-2
Maximum Special Tax Rates for Approved Property
Fiscal Year 2025-2026

Formation/
Annexation
No. Tax
Zone
Tract/Parcel
Map* Land Use Category
Taxable
Unit
Maximum
Special
Tax A Per
Taxable
Unit
Maximum
Special
Tax B Per
Taxable
Unit
Formation 1 PM 14318 Non-Residential Property Acre $2,556.07 $0.00 Formation 2 PM 36566 Non-Residential Property Acre $843.82 $0.00 No. 1 3
SDR 23-002
(National
Tube Supply)
Non-Residential Property Acre $734.11 $0.00
No. 2 4
PM 37779
(Stetson
Corner)
Non-Residential Property Acre $5,581.73 $0.00
No. 3 5
SDR 21-002
(Eggleton
Trucking)
Non-Residential Property Acre $740.00 $0.00
No. 4 6
CUP 22-002
(Newland
Kirby
Warehouse)
Non-Residential Property Acre $677.00 $0.00
No. 5 7
SDR 22-013
(Quick Quack
Car Wash)
Non-Residential Property Acre $6,639.00 $0.00
Future
Annex
ation
Area
Tract/PM___
Single Family Residential
Property RDU $____ per
RDU
$____ per
RDU
Multifamily Residential
Property RDU $____ per
RDU
$____ per
RDU
Non-Residential Property Acre $____ per
Acre
$____ per
Acre

Page 53 of 57 ends

16.E.

Page 251 of 488 ends

City of Hemet
CFD No. 2024-01 (Public Facilities Maintenance)
Rate and Method of Apportionment A-2
Maximum Special Tax Rates for Undeveloped Property
Fiscal Year 2025-2026

Formation/
Annexation
No. Tax Zone
Tract/Parcel
Map* Taxable Unit
Maximum
Special Tax
A Per
Taxable Unit
Maximum
Special Tax
B Per
Taxable Unit
Formation 1 PM 14318 Acre $2,556.07 $0.00
Formation 2 PM 36566 Acre $843.82 $0.00
No. 1 3
SDR 23-002
(National Tube
Supply)
Acre $734.11 $0.00
No. 2 4 PM 37779
(Stetson Corner) Acre $5,581.73 $0.00
No. 3 5
SDR 21-002
(Eggleton
Trucking)
Acre $740.00 $0.00
No. 4 6
CUP 22-002
(Newland Kirby
Warehouse)
Acre $677.00 $0.00
No. 5 7
SDR 22-013
(Quick Quack
Car Wash)
Acre $6,639.00 $0.00

Future
Annexatio
n Area
Tract/PM_____
RDU $____ per
RDU
$____ per
RDU
RDU $____ per
RDU
$____ per
RDU
Acre $____ per
Acre
$____ per
Acre

Maximum Special Tax Rates for Taxable Public Property
and Property Owner’s Association Property
Fiscal Year 2025-2026

Page 54 of 57 ends

16.E.

Page 252 of 488 ends

Page 55 of 57 ends

16.E.

Page 253 of 488 ends

City of Hemet
CFD No. 2024-01 (Public Facilities Maintenance)
Rate and Method of Apportionment B-1

APPENDIX B

CITY OF HEMET
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2024-01
(PUBLIC FACILITIES MAINTENANCE)

DESCRIPTION OF AUTHORIZED SERVICES

c) Public street sweeping, on the segments of the arterials within the boundaries of CFD 2024-01; as well as local roads within residential subdivisions located within CFD 2024- 01; and any portions adjacent to the properties within CFD 2024-01; and

Page 56 of 57 ends

16.E.

Page 254 of 488 ends

C-1
EXHIBIT “C”
NAMES OF THE OWNERS AND ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBERS

OF THE REAL PROPERTY WITHIN DISTRICT
ANNEXATION NO. 5 - ZONE 7

Owner Assessor's Parcel Number
Hemet Quack 22 448-250-005

Page 57 of 57 ends

16.E.

Page 255 of 488 ends

Page 256 of 488 ends

City of Hemet
City Council Meeting

STAFF REPORT

Meeting: City Council Meeting - Jan 13 2026
Department: Police Department
Submitted by: Mark Prestwich, City Manager
Martha Martinez, Management Analyst, Michael Arellano, Chief of Police;

☐ Receive and File ☒ Consent Calendar ☐ Business Item ☐ Public Hearing

TITLE:

A Resolutionof the City Council of the City of Hemet, California, Accepting the 2024-25 California State Citizens’ Option for Public Safety (COPS) and Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act (JJCPA) Allocations in the Amount of $279,055.51 and Authorize the Administrative Services Director to Establish Expenditure Accounts and Budget for the Grant Activity Period

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

It is respectfully recommended that the City Council:

Adopt a Resolutionof the City Council of the City of Hemet, California, accepting the 2024-25 California State Citizens’ Option for Public Safety (COPS) and Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act (JJCPA) allocations in the amount of $279,055.51 and authorizing the Administrative Services Director to establish expenditure accounts and budget for the grant activity period.

BACKGROUND:

The State Controller is required by law to allocate funds to each County that has established an Enhancing Law Enforcement Service Activities Subaccount (ELEAS) in accordance with the proportionate share of the State's total population in each city and unincorporated area.

Each jurisdiction within the County of Riverside receives a minimum of $100,000, as required by the State. The remaining amount received is based on the jurisdiction’s population. Hemet Police Department received monthly allocations for a total of $138,463.98. Additionally, a COPS Front-line Law Enforcement, Enhancing Law Enforcement Activities Growth Special Account allocation in the amount of $140,591.53 was received in September 2025, bringing the final grand total amount to $279,055.51.

This Citizen's Option for Public Safety (COPS) allocation, also known as Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Account (SLESA), provides funding to support frontline law enforcement services.

Page 1 of 37 ends

16.F.

Page 257 of 488 ends

ANALYSIS:

The Hemet Police Department has been allocated $279,055.51, and based on projected operational priorities, the following expenditure plan is recommended:

Technology upgrades, including supplementing expenses related to agreement renewals for Axon Camera/TASER drone-as-a-first- the as as Systems, well Safety Flock and services Camera responder program or real-time crime center, as needed.

STRATEGIC PLAN INTEGRATION:

GOAL ONE: QUALITY OF LIFE:

To ensure that Hemet is safe, clean, attractive and comfortable for all who live, work, and visit.

Objective 3: Increase Public Safety visibility and response.

GOAL FIVE: ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS
To identify the work needed inside the City organization to effectively provide services to the community and ensure financial stability.

Objective 1: Operate in a financially sustainable manner.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no match required for this allocation and no impact to the General Fund. Revenue and expenditure appropriations will be established in Fund 236 - COPS Funding/AB 3229.

ATTACHMENT(S):

Attachment 1: Resolution 2024-25 COPS_JJCPA
Attachment 2: 2024-25_COPS and JJCPA Allocation Notice
Attachment 3: 2024-25_COPS Growth Special Account Allocation

Page 2 of 37 ends

16.F.

Page 258 of 488 ends

CITY OF HEMET RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XXX 1
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28

CITY OF HEMET

HEMET, CALIFORNIA
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-xxx

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HEMET, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE 2024-25
CALIFORNIA STATE CITIZENS’ OPTION FOR PUBLIC

SAFETY (COPS) AND JUVENILE JUSTICE CRIME

PREVENTION ACT (JJCPA) ENHANCING LAW

ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES SUBACCOUNT AND GROWTH

SPECIAL ACCOUNT ALLOCATION IN THE AMOUNT OF
$279,055.51, AND AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATIVE

SERVICES DIRECTOR TO ESTABLISH AN EXPENDITURE

ACCOUNT AND BUDGET FOR THE GRANT ACTIVITY
PERIOD.

The City Council of the City of Hemet, California (hereafter referred to as the “City Council”) does resolve as follows:

WHEREAS, the California State Citizens’ Option for Public Safety and Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act provides funding to support front-line law enforcement services; and
WHEREAS, the State Controller is required by law to allocate funds to each County with an established Enhancing Law Enforcement Service Activities Subaccount (ELEAS) in accordance with the proportionate share of the State’s total population in each city and unincorporated area; and
WHEREAS, the Hemet Police Department has received $279,055.51 from Riverside County in accordance with the State Controller’s allocation of the 2024-25 Enhancing Law Enforcement Activities Subaccount and 2024-25 Enhancing Law Enforcement Activities Growth Special Account; and

Page 3 of 37 ends

16.F.

Page 259 of 488 ends

CITY OF HEMET RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XXX 2
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
WHEREAS, the Hemet Police Department recommends using the allocation for technology upgrades, such as supplementing expenses related to agreement renewals, drone as a first responder, or real-time crime center programs, etc.; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is necessary for the efficient management and operation of the Police Department that the allocation of funds be appropriated to the Police Department budget.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HEMET FINDS, DETERMINES, ORDERS, AND RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1.FINDINGS – That the City Council hereby accepts the 2024-25 ELEAS allocation in the amount of $279,055.51.

SECTION 2.DETERMINES - That the City Council authorizes the Administrative Services Director to establish an expenditure account and budget for the grant performance period.

SECTION 3.RESOLVES - This Resolution shall become effective on January 13, 2026.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 13th day of January, 2026. ____________________________
Linda Krupa, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________
John Paul Maier, City Clerk

Page 4 of 37 ends

16.F.

Page 260 of 488 ends

CITY OF HEMET RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XXX 3
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
State of California )
County of Riverside )
City of Hemet )
I, John Paul Maier, City Clerk of the City of Hemet, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted by the Hemet City Council on the 13th day of January, 2026, and was passed by the following vote:

AYES: Council Members:

NOES: Council Members:

ABSTAIN: Council Members:

ABSENT: Council Members:
_____________________________
John Paul Maier, City Clerk

Page 5 of 37 ends

16.F.

Page 261 of 488 ends

September 12, 2024
Honorable Malia M. Cohen
State Controller
3301 C Street
Sacramento, CA 95816
Attention: Evelyn Calderon-Yee, Chief
Bureau of Payments, Local Government Programs and Services Division, State Controller’s Office
Dear Controller Cohen:

Pursuant to Government Code section 30029.05, subdivision (e), paragraph (2), the Department of Finance respectfully submits the attached (Attachments I and II) percentages for the 2024-25 allocation of $214,200,000 in Citizens’ Option for Public Safety (COPS) and Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act (JJCPA) funds deposited in the Enhancing Law Enforcement Activities Subaccount (ELEAS) in the Law Enforcement Services Account within the Local Revenue Fund 2011.

Pursuant to Government Code section 30061, subdivisions (b) and (g), subsequent to the allocation described in Section 29552, subdivision (d), 47.08727192 percent of the remaining funds deposited in the ELEAS for the COPS (23.54363596 percent) and JJCPA (23.54363596 percent) programs are to be allocated, according to the relative population for each county and city, as follows:
(1) 5.15 percent to county sheriffs for county jail construction and operation ($11,031,300).
(2) 5.15 percent to district attorneys for criminal prosecution ($11,031,300). (3) 50 percent to counties to implement a comprehensive multi-agency juvenile justice plan ($107,100,000).
(4) 39.7 percent to counties and cities for front-line law enforcement ($85,037,400).

Please note that the by-county percentages for the first three allocations above: (1) county jail construction and operation, (2) district attorney criminal prosecution, and (3) multi-agency juvenile justice plans, are specified on Attachment I and the by- county/city percentages for the fourth allocation, front-line law enforcement, are identified on Attachment II.

Pursuant to Government Code section 30061, subdivision (b), paragraph (3), each law enforcement jurisdiction receiving front-line law enforcement funding is to receive a

Page 6 of 37 ends

16.F.

Page 262 of 488 ends

2 minimum grant of $100,000. The percentages included in Attachment II are calculated in a manner that provides for a minimum grant allocation of $100,000 to each law enforcement jurisdiction listed in Attachment II.

Also note that the allocations shown on Attachments I and II may be slightly different from the final allocations made by the State Controller’s Office due to rounding.

If you have any questions, or need additional information, please call Patrick Plant, Staff Finance Budget Analyst, at (916) 445-8913.

Sincerely,

AMY JARVIS
Program Budget Manager
Attachment
cc: Natalie Sidarous, Chief, Local Government Programs and Services Division, State Controller’s Office
Anne Kato, Assistant Chief, Local Government Programs and Services Division, State Controller’s Office
Melma Dizon, Manager, Local Apportionments Section, Local Government Programs and Services Division, State Controller’s Office Mr. Ou Saelee, Supervisor, Local Apportionments Section, Local Government Programs and Services Division, State Controller’s Office Kathleen Howard, Executive Director, Board of State and Community Corrections

Page 7 of 37 ends

16.F.

Page 263 of 488 ends

2024-25 Enhancing Law Enforcement Activities Subaccount Citizens' Option for Public Safety and Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act Allocations Based on Jan. 1, 2024 Population Estimates
Attachment I
rounded
Co. Jail
Operation
Allocation by
County
Percent of Co.

Jail Operation
Allocation by
County
District
Attorney
Allocation by
County
Percent of District
Attorney Allocation
by County
Juvenile
Justice
Allocation by
County
Percent of
Juvenile Justice
Allocation by
County
Total
Allocation by
County
Percent of Total
Allocation by
County
Net Total
Allocation by
County
Front-line Law
Enforcement
Percent of Net
Total Allocation
by County
Alameda 1,641,869 4.196131165% 4.196131170% 4.19613117% $462,888 4.19613117% $462,888 4.19613117% $4,494,056 4.19613117% $5,419,832 4.19613117% $8,214,706 $2,794,874 3.28664119% Alpine 1,179 0.003013175% 0.003013180% 0.00301318% $332 0.00301318% $332 0.00301318% $3,227 0.00301318% $3,892 0.00301318% $103,892 $100,000 0.11759532% Amador 39,611 0.101233991% 0.101233990% 0.10123399% $11,167 0.10123399% $11,167 0.10123399% $108,422 0.10123399% $130,756 0.10123399% $730,756 $600,000 0.70557190% Butte 205,928 0.526291013% 0.526291010% 0.52629101% $58,057 0.52629101% $58,057 0.52629101% $563,658 0.52629101% $679,771 0.52629101% $1,349,006 $669,235 0.78698904% Calaveras 44,842 0.114602879% 0.114602880% 0.11460288% $12,642 0.11460288% $12,642 0.11460288% $122,740 0.11460288% $148,024 0.11460288% $348,024 $200,000 0.23519063% Colusa 21,743 0.055568672% 0.055568670% 0.05556867% $6,130 0.05556867% $6,130 0.05556867% $59,514 0.05556867% $71,774 0.05556867% $371,774 $300,000 0.35278595% Contra Costa 1,146,626 2.930436651% 2.930436650% 2.93043665% $323,265 2.93043665% $323,265 2.93043665% $3,138,498 2.93043665% $3,785,028 2.93043665% $6,345,188 $2,560,160 3.01062822% Del Norte 26,345 0.067330022% 0.067330020% 0.06733002% $7,427 0.06733002% $7,427 0.06733002% $72,110 0.06733002% $86,965 0.06733002% $286,965 $200,000 0.23519063% El Dorado 188,583 0.481962327% 0.481962330% 0.48196233% $53,167 0.48196233% $53,167 0.48196233% $516,182 0.48196233% $622,515 0.48196233% $1,065,356 $442,841 0.52076041% Fresno 1,017,431 2.600252473% 2.600252470% 2.60025247% $286,842 2.60025247% $286,842 2.60025247% $2,784,870 2.60025247% $3,358,554 2.60025247% $5,942,590 $2,584,036 3.03870523% Glenn 28,736 0.073440710% 0.073440710% 0.07344071% $8,101 0.07344071% $8,101 0.07344071% $78,655 0.07344071% $94,858 0.07344071% $394,858 $300,000 0.35278595% Humboldt 133,100 0.340164202% 0.340164200% 0.34016420% $37,525 0.34016420% $37,525 0.34016420% $364,316 0.34016420% $439,365 0.34016420% $1,247,875 $808,510 0.95076953% Imperial 182,881 0.467389703% 0.467389700% 0.46738970% $51,559 0.46738970% $51,559 0.46738970% $500,574 0.46738970% $603,693 0.46738970% $1,403,693 $800,000 0.94076254% Inyo 18,856 0.048190355% 0.048190350% 0.04819035% $5,316 0.04819035% $5,316 0.04819035% $51,612 0.04819035% $62,244 0.04819035% $262,244 $200,000 0.23519063% Kern 910,300 2.326457348% 2.326457350% 2.32645735% $256,638 2.32645735% $256,638 2.32645735% $2,491,636 2.32645735% $3,004,913 2.32645735% $5,308,878 $2,303,965 2.70935465% Kings 152,627 0.390069434% 0.390069430% 0.39006943% $43,030 0.39006943% $43,030 0.39006943% $417,764 0.39006943% $503,824 0.39006943% $1,003,824 $500,000 0.58797658% Lake 67,001 0.171234723% 0.171234720% 0.17123472% $18,889 0.17123472% $18,889 0.17123472% $183,392 0.17123472% $221,171 0.17123472% $521,171 $300,000 0.35278595% Lassen 28,197 0.072063186% 0.072063190% 0.07206319% $7,950 0.07206319% $7,950 0.07206319% $77,180 0.07206319% $93,079 0.07206319% $293,079 $200,000 0.23519063% Los Angeles 9,824,091 25.107468631% 25.107468630% 25.107468640% $2,769,680 25.10746864% $2,769,680 25.10746864% $26,890,099 25.10746864% $32,429,459 25.10746864% $51,030,128 $18,600,669 21.87351585% Madera 159,328 0.407195206% 0.407195210% 0.40719521% $44,919 0.40719521% $44,919 0.40719521% $436,106 0.40719521% $525,944 0.40719521% $842,756 $316,812 0.37255659% Marin 252,844 0.646194421% 0.646194420% 0.64619442% $71,284 0.64619442% $71,284 0.64619442% $692,074 0.64619442% $834,642 0.64619442% $2,036,826 $1,202,184 1.41371250% Mariposa 16,966 0.043360074% 0.043360070% 0.04336007% $4,783 0.04336007% $4,783 0.04336007% $46,439 0.04336007% $56,005 0.04336007% $156,005 $100,000 0.11759532% Mendocino 89,476 0.228674171% 0.228674170% 0.22867417% $25,226 0.22867417% $25,226 0.22867417% $244,910 0.22867417% $295,362 0.22867417% $795,362 $500,000 0.58797658% Merced 287,303 0.734261425% 0.734261430% 0.73426143% $80,999 0.73426143% $80,999 0.73426143% $786,394 0.73426143% $948,391 0.73426143% $1,730,424 $782,033 0.91963436% Modoc 8,484 0.021682593% 0.021682590% 0.02168259% $2,392 0.02168259% $2,392 0.02168259% $23,222 0.02168259% $28,006 0.02168259% $228,006 $200,000 0.23519063% Mono 12,861 0.032868909% 0.032868910% 0.03286891% $3,626 0.03286891% $3,626 0.03286891% $35,203 0.03286891% $42,454 0.03286891% $242,454 $200,000 0.23519063% Monterey 437,614 1.118411849% 1.118411850% 1.11841185% $123,375 1.11841185% $123,375 1.11841185% $1,197,819 1.11841185% $1,444,570 1.11841185% $2,957,463 $1,512,893 1.77909138% Napa 135,029 0.345094155% 0.345094150% 0.34509415% $38,068 0.34509415% $38,068 0.34509415% $369,596 0.34509415% $445,733 0.34509415% $1,064,910 $619,178 0.72812375% Nevada 100,177 0.256022759% 0.256022760% 0.25602276% $28,243 0.25602276% $28,243 0.25602276% $274,200 0.25602276% $330,686 0.25602276% $733,614 $402,929 0.47382527% Orange 3,150,835 8.052601602% 8.052601600% 8.05260160% $888,307 8.05260160% $888,307 8.05260160% $8,624,336 8.05260160% $10,400,950 8.05260160% $16,048,081 $5,647,131 6.64076202% Placer 412,844 1.055107061% 1.055107060% 1.05510706% $116,392 1.05510706% $116,392 1.05510706% $1,130,020 1.05510706% $1,362,804 1.05510706% $2,284,467 $921,664 1.08383337% Plumas 18,841 0.048152019% 0.048152020% 0.04815202% $5,312 0.04815202% $5,312 0.04815202% $51,571 0.04815202% $62,194 0.04815202% $262,194 $200,000 0.23519063% Riverside 2,442,378 6.241995216% 6.241995220% 6.24199522% $688,573 6.24199522% $688,573 6.24199522% $6,685,177 6.24199522% $8,062,323 6.24199522% $12,624,484 $4,562,160 5.36488688% Sacramento 1,578,938 4.035298157% 4.035298160% 4.03529816% $445,146 4.03529816% $445,146 4.03529816% $4,321,804 4.03529816% $5,212,096 4.03529816% $7,809,399 $2,597,303 3.05430711% San Benito 65,853 0.168300775% 0.168300780% 0.16830078% $18,566 0.16830078% $18,566 0.16830078% $180,250 0.16830078% $217,382 0.16830078% $517,382 $300,000 0.35278595% San Bernardino 2,181,433 5.575097036% 5.575097040% 5.57509704% $615,006 5.57509704% $615,006 5.57509704% $5,970,929 5.57509704% $7,200,940 5.57509704% $11,221,944 $4,021,003 4.72851147% San Diego 3,291,101 8.411079979% 8.411079980% 8.41107998% $927,851 8.41107998% $927,851 8.41107998% $9,008,267 8.41107998% $10,863,970 8.41107998% $16,358,369 $5,494,399 6.46115597% San Francisco 843,071 2.154639924% 2.154639920% 2.15463992% $237,685 2.15463992% $237,685 2.15463992% $2,307,619 2.15463992% $2,782,989 2.15463992% $4,084,918 $1,301,929 1.53100798% San Joaquin 791,408 2.022604588% 2.022604590% 2.02260459% $223,120 2.02260459% $223,120 2.02260459% $2,166,210 2.02260459% $2,612,449 2.02260459% $4,098,568 $1,486,119 1.74760654% San Luis Obispo 278,469 0.711684336% 0.711684340% 0.71168434% $78,508 0.71168434% $78,508 0.71168434% $762,214 0.71168434% $919,230 0.71168434% $1,804,651 $885,421 1.04121306% San Mateo 741,565 1.895220634% 1.895220630% 1.89522063% $209,067 1.89522063% $209,067 1.89522063% $2,029,781 1.89522063% $2,447,916 1.89522063% $4,790,617 $2,342,701 2.75490614% Santa Barbara 443,623 1.133769074% 1.133769070% 1.13376907% $125,069 1.13376907% $125,069 1.13376907% $1,214,267 1.13376907% $1,464,406 1.13376907% $2,582,423 $1,118,018 1.31473646% Santa Clara 1,903,198 4.864010735% 4.864010730% 4.86401073% $536,564 4.86401073% $536,564 4.86401073% $5,209,355 4.86401073% $6,282,483 4.86401073% $9,631,468 $3,348,985 3.93825005% Santa Cruz 262,572 0.671056310% 0.671056310% 0.67105631% $74,026 0.67105631% $74,026 0.67105631% $718,701 0.67105631% $866,754 0.67105631% $1,463,573 $596,819 0.70183093% Shasta 179,195 0.457969378% 0.457969380% 0.45796938% $50,520 0.45796938% $50,520 0.45796938% $490,485 0.45796938% $591,525 0.45796938% $1,035,707 $444,182 0.52233669% Sierra 3,171 0.008104137% 0.008104140% 0.00810414% $894 0.00810414% $894 0.00810414% $8,680 0.00810414% $10,468 0.00810414% $210,468 $200,000 0.23519063% Siskiyou 43,409 0.110940555% 0.110940550% 0.11094055% $12,238 0.11094055% $12,238 0.11094055% $118,817 0.11094055% $143,294 0.11094055% $1,243,294 $1,100,000 1.29354849% Solano 446,426 1.140932712% 1.140932710% 1.14093271% $125,860 1.14093271% $125,860 1.14093271% $1,221,939 1.14093271% $1,473,658 1.14093271% $2,504,995 $1,031,337 1.21280405% Sonoma 478,152 1.222014977% 1.222014980% 1.22201498% $134,804 1.22201498% $134,804 1.22201498% $1,308,778 1.22201498% $1,578,386 1.22201498% $2,850,419 $1,272,032 1.49585056% Stanislaus 548,744 1.402427234% 1.402427230% 1.40242723% $154,706 1.40242723% $154,706 1.40242723% $1,502,000 1.40242723% $1,811,411 1.40242723% $3,125,535 $1,314,124 1.54534806% Sutter 100,110 0.255851527% 0.255851530% 0.25585153% $28,224 0.25585153% $28,224 0.25585153% $274,017 0.25585153% $330,464 0.25585153% $638,959 $308,494 0.36277478% Tehama 64,308 0.164352213% 0.164352210% 0.16435221% $18,130 0.16435221% $18,130 0.16435221% $176,021 0.16435221% $212,282 0.16435221% $612,282 $400,000 0.47038127% Trinity 15,915 0.040674029% 0.040674030% 0.04067403% $4,487 0.04067403% $4,487 0.04067403% $43,562 0.04067403% $52,536 0.04067403% $152,536 $100,000 0.11759532% Tulare 478,918 1.223972647% 1.223972650% 1.22397265% $135,020 1.22397265% $135,020 1.22397265% $1,310,875 1.22397265% $1,580,915 1.22397265% $2,720,789 $1,139,874 1.34043815% Tuolumne 54,407 0.139048187% 0.139048190% 0.13904819% $15,339 0.13904819% $15,339 0.13904819% $148,921 0.13904819% $179,598 0.13904819% $379,598 $200,000 0.23519063% Ventura 823,863 2.105549962% 2.105549960% 2.10554996% $232,270 2.10554996% $232,270 2.10554996% $2,255,044 2.10554996% $2,719,583 2.10554996% $4,318,924 $1,599,341 1.88075036% Yolo 221,666 0.566512682% 0.566512680% 0.56651268% $62,494 0.56651268% $62,494 0.56651268% $606,735 0.56651268% $731,723 0.56651268% $1,232,183 $500,461 0.58851864% Yuba 83,721 0.213966094% 0.213966090% 0.21396609% $23,603 0.21396609% $23,603 0.21396609% $229,158 0.21396609% $276,364 0.21396609% $579,948 $303,583 0.35699994% Total 39,128,162 100.00000000% 99.99999999% 100.00000000% $11,031,300 100.00000000% $11,031,300 100.00000000% $107,100,000 100.00000000% $129,162,600 100.00000000% $214,200,000 $85,037,400 100.00000000% *Note that the COPS Front-line Law Enforcement breakdown by county and city for SCO distribution is provided in Attachment II.

COUNTY
1/1/2024
Population by
County
Percent of 1/1/2024
Population by County
Percent of 1/1/2024
Population by County
COPS (Excluding Front-line Enforcement)*

5.15%
11,031,300 11,031,300 107,100,000 129,162,600
Total

5.15%
Net Total (Including Front-line Enforcemnet) JJCPA
100.00%
214,200,000

50.00% 60.30%

Page 8 of 37 ends

16.F.

Page 264 of 488 ends

2024-25 Enhancing Law Enforcement Activities Subaccount Citizens' Option for Public Safety
Front-line Law Enforcement Allocation for 2024-25

ATTACHMENT II
City/County
City/County
Population Estimates
1/1/2024
Projected Allocations by
City/County
Percent of Allocation by
City/County
Alameda 1,641,869 $2,794,874 3.28664121%
Alameda 78,071 $120,563 0.14177611%
Albany 20,325 $100,000 0.11759532%
Berkeley 125,327 $193,539 0.22759250%
Dublin 72,917 $112,604 0.13241650%
Emeryville 13,314 $100,000 0.11759532%
Fremont 229,250 $354,024 0.41631556%
Hayward 159,770 $246,728 0.29014062%
Livermore 84,828 $130,997 0.15404675%
Newark 46,635 $100,000 0.11759532%
Oakland 425,093 $656,458 0.77196437%
Piedmont 10,782 $100,000 0.11759532%
Pleasanton 75,960 $117,303 0.13794255%
San Leandro 87,098 $134,503 0.15816904%
Union City 66,432 $102,589 0.12063981%
Unincorporated 146,067 $225,567 0.26525612%
Alpine 1,179 $100,000 0.11759532%
Amador 39,611 $600,000 0.70557192%
Amador 193 $100,000 0.11759532%
Ione 8,856 $100,000 0.11759532%
Jackson 4,867 $100,000 0.11759532%
Plymouth 1,061 $100,000 0.11759532%
Sutter Creek 2,553 $100,000 0.11759532%
Unincorporated 22,081 $100,000 0.11759532%
Butte 205,928 $669,235 0.78698906%
Biggs 1,853 $100,000 0.11759532%
Chico 109,589 $169,235 0.19901246%
Gridley 6,935 $100,000 0.11759532%
Oroville 18,129 $100,000 0.11759532%
Paradise 10,691 $100,000 0.11759532%
Unincorporated 58,731 $100,000 0.11759532%
Calaveras 44,842 $200,000 0.23519064%
Angels City 3,587 $100,000 0.11759532%
Unincorporated 41,255 $100,000 0.11759532%
Colusa 21,743 $300,000 0.35278596%
Colusa 6,447 $100,000 0.11759532%
Williams 5,528 $100,000 0.11759532%
Unincorporated 9,768 $100,000 0.11759532%
Contra Costa 1,146,626 $2,560,160 3.01062825%
Antioch 115,632 $178,567 0.20998648%
Brentwood 64,811 $100,086 0.11769609%
Clayton 10,683 $100,000 0.11759532%
Concord 121,513 $187,649 0.22066632%
Danville 42,567 $100,000 0.11759532%
El Cerrito 25,700 $100,000 0.11759532%
Hercules 26,063 $100,000 0.11759532%
Lafayette 24,808 $100,000 0.11759532%
Martinez 36,439 $100,000 0.11759532%
Moraga 16,784 $100,000 0.11759532%
Oakley 45,736 $100,000 0.11759532%
Orinda 19,191 $100,000 0.11759532%
Pinole 18,192 $100,000 0.11759532%
Pittsburg 75,085 $115,952 0.13635356%

Page 9 of 37 ends

16.F.

Page 265 of 488 ends

2024-25 Enhancing Law Enforcement Activities Subaccount Citizens' Option for Public Safety
Front-line Law Enforcement Allocation for 2024-25

ATTACHMENT II
City/County
City/County
Population Estimates
1/1/2024
Projected Allocations by
City/County
Percent of Allocation by
City/County
Pleasant Hill 33,352 $100,000 0.11759532%
Richmond 112,735 $174,093 0.20472556%
San Pablo 31,088 $100,000 0.11759532%
San Ramon 82,525 $127,441 0.14986452%
Walnut Creek 69,433 $107,223 0.12608959%
Unincorporated 174,289 $269,149 0.31650697%
Kensington Police Department 0 $100,000 0.11759532%
Del Norte 26,345 $200,000 0.23519064%
Crescent City 5,564 $100,000 0.11759532%
Unincorporated 20,781 $100,000 0.11759532%
El Dorado 188,583 $442,841 0.52076042%
Placerville 10,540 $100,000 0.11759532%
South Lake Tahoe 20,790 $100,000 0.11759532%
Unincorporated 157,253 $242,841 0.28556978%
Fresno 1,017,431 $2,584,036 3.03870527%
Clovis 126,133 $194,783 0.22905619%
Coalinga 17,107 $100,000 0.11759532%
Firebaugh 8,415 $100,000 0.11759532%
Fowler 7,367 $100,000 0.11759532%
Fresno 546,971 $844,671 0.99329352%
Huron 6,348 $100,000 0.11759532%
Kerman 17,256 $100,000 0.11759532%
Kingsburg 13,042 $100,000 0.11759532%
Mendota 12,531 $100,000 0.11759532%
Orange Cove 9,516 $100,000 0.11759532%
Parlier 14,368 $100,000 0.11759532%
Reedley 25,653 $100,000 0.11759532%
Sanger 26,357 $100,000 0.11759532%
San Joaquin 3,616 $100,000 0.11759532%
Selma 24,371 $100,000 0.11759532%
Unincorporated 158,380 $244,582 0.28761640%
Glenn 28,736 $300,000 0.35278596%
Orland 8,537 $100,000 0.11759532%
Willows 6,321 $100,000 0.11759532%
Unincorporated 13,878 $100,000 0.11759532%
Humboldt 133,100 $808,510 0.95076955%
Arcata 18,540 $100,000 0.11759532%
Blue Lake 1,149 $100,000 0.11759532%
Eureka 26,073 $100,000 0.11759532%
Ferndale 1,356 $100,000 0.11759532%
Fortuna 12,181 $100,000 0.11759532%
Rio Dell 3,241 $100,000 0.11759532%
Trinidad 294 $100,000 0.11759532%
Unincorporated 70,266 $108,510 0.12760231%
Imperial 182,881 $800,000 0.94076256%
Brawley 28,345 $100,000 0.11759532%
Calexico 39,262 $100,000 0.11759532%
Calipatria 6,342 $100,000 0.11759532%
El Centro 44,952 $100,000 0.11759532%
Holtville 5,583 $100,000 0.11759532%
Imperial 22,141 $100,000 0.11759532%
Westmorland 2,050 $100,000 0.11759532%
Unincorporated 34,206 $100,000 0.11759532%

Page 10 of 37 ends

16.F.

Page 266 of 488 ends

2024-25 Enhancing Law Enforcement Activities Subaccount Citizens' Option for Public Safety
Front-line Law Enforcement Allocation for 2024-25

ATTACHMENT II
City/County
City/County
Population Estimates
1/1/2024
Projected Allocations by
City/County
Percent of Allocation by
City/County
Inyo 18,856 $200,000 0.23519064%
Bishop 3,848 $100,000 0.11759532%
Unincorporated 15,008 $100,000 0.11759532%
Kern 910,300 $2,303,965 2.70935469%
Arvin 19,651 $100,000 0.11759532%
Bakersfield 411,109 $634,863 0.74656957%
California City 13,079 $100,000 0.11759532%
Delano 52,484 $100,000 0.11759532%
Maricopa 1,004 $100,000 0.11759532%
McFarland 13,965 $100,000 0.11759532%
Ridgecrest 27,940 $100,000 0.11759532%
Shafter 22,226 $100,000 0.11759532%
Taft 6,953 $100,000 0.11759532%
Tehachapi 11,092 $100,000 0.11759532%
Wasco 27,028 $100,000 0.11759532%
Unincorporated 303,769 $469,101 0.55164128%
Bear Valley Community Services District 0 $100,000 0.11759532% Stallion Springs Community Services District 0 $100,000 0.11759532% Kings 152,627 $500,000 0.58797660%
Avenal 13,981 $100,000 0.11759532%
Corcoran 21,633 $100,000 0.11759532%
Hanford 59,286 $100,000 0.11759532%
Lemoore 26,855 $100,000 0.11759532%
Unincorporated 30,872 $100,000 0.11759532%
Lake 67,001 $300,000 0.35278596%
Clearlake 16,553 $100,000 0.11759532%
Lakeport 4,982 $100,000 0.11759532%
Unincorporated 45,466 $100,000 0.11759532%
Lassen 28,197 $200,000 0.23519064%
Susanville 11,639 $100,000 0.11759532%
Unincorporated 16,558 $100,000 0.11759532%
Los Angeles 9,824,091 $18,600,669 21.87351489%
Agoura Hills 19,841 $100,000 0.11759532%
Alhambra 81,811 $126,338 0.14856791%
Arcadia 55,783 $100,000 0.11759532%
Artesia 16,019 $100,000 0.11759532%
Avalon 3,313 $100,000 0.11759532%
Azusa 49,420 $100,000 0.11759532%
Baldwin Park 70,660 $109,118 0.12831781%
Bell 33,301 $100,000 0.11759532%
Bellflower 76,990 $118,893 0.13981302%
Bell Gardens 38,381 $100,000 0.11759532%
Beverly Hills 31,806 $100,000 0.11759532%
Bradbury 898 $100,000 0.11759532%
Burbank 105,603 $163,080 0.19177393%
Calabasas 22,742 $100,000 0.11759532%
Carson 91,924 $141,955 0.16693301%
Cerritos 47,806 $100,000 0.11759532%
Claremont 37,686 $100,000 0.11759532%
Commerce 12,124 $100,000 0.11759532%
Compton 93,671 $144,653 0.17010554%
Covina 50,485 $100,000 0.11759532%
Cudahy 22,210 $100,000 0.11759532%

Page 11 of 37 ends

16.F.

Page 267 of 488 ends

2024-25 Enhancing Law Enforcement Activities Subaccount Citizens' Option for Public Safety
Front-line Law Enforcement Allocation for 2024-25

ATTACHMENT II
City/County
City/County
Population Estimates
1/1/2024
Projected Allocations by
City/County
Percent of Allocation by
City/County
Culver City 40,213 $100,000 0.11759532%
Diamond Bar 53,335 $100,000 0.11759532%
Downey 111,493 $172,175 0.20247010%
Duarte 23,656 $100,000 0.11759532%
El Monte 106,786 $164,906 0.19392224%
El Segundo 16,964 $100,000 0.11759532%
Gardena 60,028 $100,000 0.11759532%
Glendale 191,586 $295,861 0.34791814%
Glendora 51,209 $100,000 0.11759532%
Hawaiian Gardens 13,560 $100,000 0.11759532%
Hawthorne 85,566 $132,137 0.15538695%
Hermosa Beach 19,088 $100,000 0.11759532%
Hidden Hills 1,727 $100,000 0.11759532%
Huntington Park 53,219 $100,000 0.11759532%
Industry 426 $100,000 0.11759532%
Inglewood 106,065 $163,793 0.19261291%
Irwindale 1,499 $100,000 0.11759532%
La Canada Flintridge 20,048 $100,000 0.11759532%
La Habra Heights 5,488 $100,000 0.11759532%
Lakewood 80,162 $123,792 0.14557334%
La Mirada 48,077 $100,000 0.11759532%
Lancaster 172,631 $266,589 0.31349606%
La Puente 37,459 $100,000 0.11759532%
La Verne 31,697 $100,000 0.11759532%
Lawndale 30,855 $100,000 0.11759532%
Lomita 20,320 $100,000 0.11759532%
Long Beach 458,813 $708,531 0.83319953%
Los Angeles 3,814,318 $5,890,337 6.92675979%
Lynwood 66,271 $102,340 0.12034743%
Malibu 10,621 $100,000 0.11759532%
Manhattan Beach 34,195 $100,000 0.11759532%
Maywood 24,451 $100,000 0.11759532%
Monrovia 38,087 $100,000 0.11759532%
Montebello 61,930 $100,000 0.11759532%
Monterey Park 59,347 $100,000 0.11759532%
Norwalk 101,172 $156,237 0.18372728%
Palmdale 166,055 $256,434 0.30155412%
Palos Verdes Estates 12,974 $100,000 0.11759532%
Paramount 52,153 $100,000 0.11759532%
Pasadena 139,692 $215,722 0.25367919%
Pico Rivera 60,820 $100,000 0.11759532%
Pomona 152,166 $234,985 0.27633184%
Rancho Palos Verdes 40,919 $100,000 0.11759532%
Redondo Beach 68,239 $105,379 0.12392130%
Rolling Hills 1,677 $100,000 0.11759532%
Rolling Hills Estates 8,534 $100,000 0.11759532%
Rosemead 50,541 $100,000 0.11759532%
San Dimas 33,920 $100,000 0.11759532%
San Fernando 23,643 $100,000 0.11759532%
San Gabriel 38,613 $100,000 0.11759532%
San Marino 12,379 $100,000 0.11759532%
Santa Clarita 230,428 $355,843 0.41845480%
Santa Fe Springs 18,640 $100,000 0.11759532%
Santa Monica 92,912 $143,481 0.16872720%
Sierra Madre 10,909 $100,000 0.11759532%
Signal Hill 11,448 $100,000 0.11759532%
South El Monte 19,441 $100,000 0.11759532%
South Gate 92,729 $143,199 0.16839488%
South Pasadena 26,270 $100,000 0.11759532%

Page 12 of 37 ends

16.F.

Page 268 of 488 ends

2024-25 Enhancing Law Enforcement Activities Subaccount Citizens' Option for Public Safety
Front-line Law Enforcement Allocation for 2024-25

ATTACHMENT II
City/County
City/County
Population Estimates
1/1/2024
Projected Allocations by
City/County
Percent of Allocation by
City/County
Temple City 35,975 $100,000 0.11759532%
Torrance 142,910 $220,692 0.25952304%
Vernon 205 $100,000 0.11759532%
Walnut 27,867 $100,000 0.11759532%
West Covina 109,105 $168,488 0.19813352%
West Hollywood 35,075 $100,000 0.11759532%
Westlake Village 7,902 $100,000 0.11759532%
Whittier 87,527 $135,165 0.15894810%
Unincorporated 997,587 $1,540,544 1.81160739%
Madera 159,328 $316,812 0.37255659%
Chowchilla 18,930 $100,000 0.11759532%
Madera 66,560 $102,787 0.12087225%
Unincorporated 73,838 $114,026 0.13408902%
Marin 252,844 $1,202,184 1.41371254%
Belvedere 2,043 $100,000 0.11759532%
Corte Madera 9,882 $100,000 0.11759532%
Fairfax 7,371 $100,000 0.11759532%
Larkspur 12,655 $100,000 0.11759532%
Mill Valley 13,635 $100,000 0.11759532%
Novato 51,140 $100,000 0.11759532%
Ross 2,272 $100,000 0.11759532%
San Anselmo 12,426 $100,000 0.11759532%
San Rafael 59,585 $100,000 0.11759532%
Sausalito 6,856 $100,000 0.11759532%
Tiburon 8,809 $100,000 0.11759532%
Unincorporated 66,170 $102,184 0.12016402%
Mariposa 16,966 $100,000 0.11759532%
Mendocino 89,476 $500,000 0.58797660%
Fort Bragg 7,179 $100,000 0.11759532%
Point Arena 445 $100,000 0.11759532%
Ukiah 16,108 $100,000 0.11759532%
Willits 4,830 $100,000 0.11759532%
Unincorporated 60,914 $100,000 0.11759532%
Merced 287,303 $782,033 0.91963438%
Atwater 31,397 $100,000 0.11759532%
Dos Palos 5,633 $100,000 0.11759532%
Gustine 5,936 $100,000 0.11759532%
Livingston 14,286 $100,000 0.11759532%
Los Banos 47,419 $100,000 0.11759532%
Merced 91,837 $141,821 0.16677502%
Unincorporated 90,795 $140,212 0.16488276%
Modoc 8,484 $200,000 0.23519064%
Alturas 2,659 $100,000 0.11759532%
Unincorporated 5,825 $100,000 0.11759532%
Mono 12,861 $200,000 0.23519064%
Mammoth Lakes 7,110 $100,000 0.11759532%
Unincorporated 5,751 $100,000 0.11759532%
Monterey 437,614 $1,512,893 1.77909141%
Carmel-by-the-Sea 3,122 $100,000 0.11759532%
Del Rey Oaks 1,569 $100,000 0.11759532%
Gonzales 8,466 $100,000 0.11759532%

Page 13 of 37 ends

16.F.

Page 269 of 488 ends

2024-25 Enhancing Law Enforcement Activities Subaccount Citizens' Option for Public Safety
Front-line Law Enforcement Allocation for 2024-25

ATTACHMENT II
City/County
City/County
Population Estimates
1/1/2024
Projected Allocations by
City/County
Percent of Allocation by
City/County
Greenfield 20,561 $100,000 0.11759532%
King City 14,216 $100,000 0.11759532%
Marina 22,695 $100,000 0.11759532%
Monterey 27,106 $100,000 0.11759532%
Pacific Grove 14,966 $100,000 0.11759532%
Salinas 162,037 $250,229 0.29425747%
Sand City 379 $100,000 0.11759532%
Seaside 30,197 $100,000 0.11759532%
Soledad 26,966 $100,000 0.11759532%
Unincorporated 105,334 $162,664 0.19128542%
Napa 135,029 $619,178 0.72812376%
American Canyon 21,758 $100,000 0.11759532%
Calistoga 5,142 $100,000 0.11759532%
Napa 77,174 $119,178 0.14014716%
St Helena 5,314 $100,000 0.11759532%
Yountville 2,781 $100,000 0.11759532%
Unincorporated 22,860 $100,000 0.11759532%
Nevada 100,177 $402,929 0.47382528%
Grass Valley 13,400 $100,000 0.11759532%
Nevada City 3,347 $100,000 0.11759532%
Truckee 16,778 $100,000 0.11759532%
Unincorporated 66,652 $102,929 0.12103932%
Orange 3,150,835 $5,647,131 6.64076208%
Aliso Viejo 50,068 $100,000 0.11759532%
Anaheim 340,160 $525,299 0.61772694%
Brea 47,725 $100,000 0.11759532%
Buena Park 82,689 $127,694 0.15016235%
Costa Mesa 109,423 $168,979 0.19871101%
Cypress 49,345 $100,000 0.11759532%
Dana Point 32,596 $100,000 0.11759532%
Fountain Valley 56,333 $100,000 0.11759532%
Fullerton 140,311 $216,678 0.25480328%
Garden Grove 171,024 $264,107 0.31057777%
Huntington Beach 192,503 $297,277 0.34958340%
Irvine 314,550 $485,750 0.57121946%
Laguna Beach 22,449 $100,000 0.11759532%
Laguna Hills 30,315 $100,000 0.11759532%
Laguna Niguel 64,291 $100,000 0.11759532%
Laguna Woods 17,148 $100,000 0.11759532%
La Habra 60,901 $100,000 0.11759532%
Lake Forest 86,917 $134,223 0.15784035%
La Palma 15,071 $100,000 0.11759532%
Los Alamitos 11,947 $100,000 0.11759532%
Mission Viejo 91,304 $140,998 0.16580709%
Newport Beach 82,419 $127,277 0.14967203%
Orange 138,621 $214,068 0.25173426%
Placentia 52,226 $100,000 0.11759532%
Rancho Santa Margarita 46,305 $100,000 0.11759532%
San Clemente 62,297 $100,000 0.11759532%
San Juan Capistrano 34,992 $100,000 0.11759532%
Santa Ana 310,797 $479,955 0.56440405%
Seal Beach 24,350 $100,000 0.11759532%
Stanton 40,297 $100,000 0.11759532%
Tustin 78,844 $121,756 0.14317987%
Villa Park 5,705 $100,000 0.11759532%
Westminster 89,490 $138,197 0.16251289%

Page 14 of 37 ends

16.F.

Page 270 of 488 ends

2024-25 Enhancing Law Enforcement Activities Subaccount Citizens' Option for Public Safety
Front-line Law Enforcement Allocation for 2024-25

ATTACHMENT II
City/County
City/County
Population Estimates
1/1/2024
Projected Allocations by
City/County
Percent of Allocation by
City/County
Yorba Linda 66,087 $102,056 0.12001329%
Unincorporated 131,335 $202,817 0.23850296%
Placer 412,844 $921,664 1.08383338%
Auburn 13,218 $100,000 0.11759532%
Colfax 1,988 $100,000 0.11759532%
Lincoln 53,231 $100,000 0.11759532%
Loomis 6,601 $100,000 0.11759532%
Rocklin 71,609 $110,584 0.13004118%
Roseville 154,329 $238,326 0.28025982%
Unincorporated 111,868 $172,754 0.20315110%
Plumas 18,841 $200,000 0.23519064%
Portola 2,075 $100,000 0.11759532%
Unincorporated 16,766 $100,000 0.11759532%
Riverside 2,442,378 $4,562,160 5.36488691%
Banning 31,213 $100,000 0.11759532%
Beaumont 57,416 $100,000 0.11759532%
Blythe 17,378 $100,000 0.11759532%
Calimesa 10,867 $100,000 0.11759532%
Canyon Lake 10,832 $100,000 0.11759532%
Cathedral City 50,911 $100,000 0.11759532%
Coachella 43,173 $100,000 0.11759532%
Corona 156,615 $241,856 0.28441118%
Desert Hot Springs 32,654 $100,000 0.11759532%
Eastvale 68,884 $106,376 0.12509261%
Hemet 89,663 $138,464 0.16282706%
Indian Wells 4,797 $100,000 0.11759532%
Indio 90,680 $140,034 0.16467392%
Jurupa Valley 104,721 $161,718 0.19017222%
Lake Elsinore 71,452 $110,341 0.12975607%
La Quinta 38,370 $100,000 0.11759532%
Menifee 111,560 $172,279 0.20259177%
Moreno Valley 207,146 $319,889 0.37617493%
Murrieta 109,177 $168,599 0.19826427%
Norco 25,068 $100,000 0.11759532%
Palm Desert 50,889 $100,000 0.11759532%
Palm Springs 43,791 $100,000 0.11759532%
Perris 79,311 $122,478 0.14402793%
Rancho Mirage 16,992 $100,000 0.11759532%
Riverside 316,690 $489,055 0.57510567%
San Jacinto 53,538 $100,000 0.11759532%
Temecula 108,700 $167,862 0.19739804%
Wildomar 36,327 $100,000 0.11759532%
Unincorporated 403,563 $623,210 0.73286612%
Sacramento 1,578,938 $2,597,303 3.05430711%
Citrus Heights 85,554 $132,118 0.15536515%
Elk Grove 178,679 $275,929 0.32447917%
Folsom 88,023 $135,931 0.15984883%
Galt 25,785 $100,000 0.11759532%
Isleton 767 $100,000 0.11759532%
Rancho Cordova 82,109 $126,798 0.14910907%
Sacramento 520,407 $803,649 0.94505358%
Unincorporated 597,614 $922,877 1.08526067%
San Benito 65,853 $300,000 0.35278596%
Hollister 42,872 $100,000 0.11759532%

Page 15 of 37 ends

16.F.

Page 271 of 488 ends

2024-25 Enhancing Law Enforcement Activities Subaccount Citizens' Option for Public Safety
Front-line Law Enforcement Allocation for 2024-25

ATTACHMENT II
City/County
City/County
Population Estimates
1/1/2024
Projected Allocations by
City/County
Percent of Allocation by
City/County
San Juan Bautista 2,032 $100,000 0.11759532%
Unincorporated 20,949 $100,000 0.11759532%
San Bernardino 2,181,433 $4,021,003 4.72851150%
Adelanto 36,131 $100,000 0.11759532%
Apple Valley 74,322 $114,773 0.13496796%
Barstow 24,669 $100,000 0.11759532%
Big Bear Lake 4,958 $100,000 0.11759532%
Chino 92,585 $142,976 0.16813338%
Chino Hills 76,414 $118,004 0.13876701%
Colton 52,778 $100,000 0.11759532%
Fontana 214,223 $330,818 0.38902669%
Grand Terrace 12,771 $100,000 0.11759532%
Hesperia 100,087 $154,561 0.18175693%
Highland 55,676 $100,000 0.11759532%
Loma Linda 24,965 $100,000 0.11759532%
Montclair 37,211 $100,000 0.11759532%
Needles 4,769 $100,000 0.11759532%
Ontario 181,224 $279,859 0.32910086%
Rancho Cucamonga 173,316 $267,647 0.31474001%
Redlands 72,696 $112,262 0.13201516%
Rialto 103,097 $159,210 0.18722306%
San Bernardino 226,541 $349,841 0.41139605%
Twentynine Palms 25,346 $100,000 0.11759532%
Upland 78,285 $120,893 0.14216473%
Victorville 138,202 $213,421 0.25097336%
Yucaipa 53,810 $100,000 0.11759532%
Yucca Valley 21,594 $100,000 0.11759532%
Unincorporated 295,763 $456,738 0.53710246%
San Diego 3,291,101 $5,494,399 6.46115601%
Carlsbad 114,319 $176,539 0.20760209%
Chula Vista 278,247 $429,689 0.50529359%
Coronado 21,589 $100,000 0.11759532%
Del Mar 3,919 $100,000 0.11759532%
El Cajon 104,180 $160,882 0.18918977%
Encinitas 61,028 $100,000 0.11759532%
Escondido 150,002 $231,644 0.27240204%
Imperial Beach 26,096 $100,000 0.11759532%
La Mesa 60,620 $100,000 0.11759532%
Lemon Grove 27,568 $100,000 0.11759532%
National City 58,555 $100,000 0.11759532%
Oceanside 171,483 $264,816 0.31141131%
Poway 49,273 $100,000 0.11759532%
San Diego 1,385,379 $2,139,399 2.51583354%
San Marcos 95,998 $148,247 0.17433135%
Santee 59,195 $100,000 0.11759532%
Solana Beach 12,887 $100,000 0.11759532%
Vista 99,723 $153,999 0.18109591%
Unincorporated 511,040 $789,184 0.92804321%
San Francisco 843,071 $1,301,929 1.53100798%
San Joaquin 791,408 $1,486,119 1.74760657%
Escalon 7,249 $100,000 0.11759532%
Lathrop 37,033 $100,000 0.11759532%
Lodi 66,492 $102,682 0.12074877%
Manteca 90,917 $140,400 0.16510431%
Ripon 15,741 $100,000 0.11759532%

Page 16 of 37 ends

16.F.

Page 272 of 488 ends

2024-25 Enhancing Law Enforcement Activities Subaccount Citizens' Option for Public Safety
Front-line Law Enforcement Allocation for 2024-25

ATTACHMENT II
City/County
City/County
Population Estimates
1/1/2024
Projected Allocations by
City/County
Percent of Allocation by
City/County
Stockton 317,204 $489,849 0.57603909%
Tracy 96,609 $149,190 0.17544092%
Mountain House 28,063 $100,000 0.11759532%
Unincorporated 132,100 $203,998 0.23989220%
San Luis Obispo 278,469 $885,421 1.04121308%
Arroyo Grande 17,941 $100,000 0.11759532%
Atascadero 30,279 $100,000 0.11759532%
El Paso de Robles 30,907 $100,000 0.11759532%
Grover Beach 12,481 $100,000 0.11759532%
Morro Bay 10,261 $100,000 0.11759532%
Pismo Beach 7,846 $100,000 0.11759532%
San Luis Obispo 48,684 $100,000 0.11759532%
Unincorporated 120,070 $185,421 0.21804584%
San Mateo 741,565 $2,342,701 2.75490620%
Atherton 6,976 $100,000 0.11759532%
Belmont 26,931 $100,000 0.11759532%
Brisbane 4,661 $100,000 0.11759532%
Burlingame 30,513 $100,000 0.11759532%
Colma 1,410 $100,000 0.11759532%
Daly City 101,458 $156,679 0.18424665%
East Palo Alto 29,078 $100,000 0.11759532%
Foster City 32,581 $100,000 0.11759532%
Half Moon Bay 11,238 $100,000 0.11759532%
Hillsborough 11,116 $100,000 0.11759532%
Menlo Park 33,140 $100,000 0.11759532%
Millbrae 23,093 $100,000 0.11759532%
Pacifica 37,062 $100,000 0.11759532%
Portola Valley 4,249 $100,000 0.11759532%
Redwood City 81,863 $126,419 0.14866234%
San Bruno 42,152 $100,000 0.11759532%
San Carlos 29,420 $100,000 0.11759532%
San Mateo 103,352 $159,603 0.18768613%
South San Francisco 64,601 $100,000 0.11759532%
Woodside 5,133 $100,000 0.11759532%
Unincorporated 61,538 $100,000 0.11759532%
Broadmoor Police Protection District 0 $100,000 0.11759532% Santa Barbara 443,623 $1,118,018 1.31473647%
Buellton 4,970 $100,000 0.11759532%
Carpinteria 12,744 $100,000 0.11759532%
Goleta 32,515 $100,000 0.11759532%
Guadalupe 8,676 $100,000 0.11759532%
Lompoc 43,610 $100,000 0.11759532%
Santa Barbara 85,679 $132,312 0.15559215%
Santa Maria 110,608 $170,809 0.20086295%
Solvang 5,663 $100,000 0.11759532%
Unincorporated 139,158 $214,898 0.25270945%
Santa Clara 1,903,198 $3,348,985 3.93825007%
Campbell 43,095 $100,000 0.11759532%
Cupertino 59,471 $100,000 0.11759532%
Gilroy 61,033 $100,000 0.11759532%
Los Altos 31,255 $100,000 0.11759532%
Los Altos Hills 8,476 $100,000 0.11759532%
Los Gatos 33,230 $100,000 0.11759532%
Milpitas 81,773 $126,280 0.14849890%
Monte Sereno 3,582 $100,000 0.11759532%

Page 17 of 37 ends

16.F.

Page 273 of 488 ends

2024-25 Enhancing Law Enforcement Activities Subaccount Citizens' Option for Public Safety
Front-line Law Enforcement Allocation for 2024-25

ATTACHMENT II
City/County
City/County
Population Estimates
1/1/2024
Projected Allocations by
City/County
Percent of Allocation by
City/County
Morgan Hill 46,384 $100,000 0.11759532%
Mountain View 86,535 $133,633 0.15714664%
Palo Alto 67,973 $104,969 0.12343825%
San Jose 969,491 $1,497,156 1.76058535%
Santa Clara 132,048 $203,918 0.23979776%
Saratoga 30,819 $100,000 0.11759532%
Sunnyvale 157,566 $243,324 0.28613818%
Unincorporated 90,467 $139,705 0.16428711%
Santa Cruz 262,572 $596,819 0.70183094%
Capitola 9,497 $100,000 0.11759532%
Santa Cruz 62,776 $100,000 0.11759532%
Scotts Valley 11,816 $100,000 0.11759532%
Watsonville 51,032 $100,000 0.11759532%
Unincorporated 127,451 $196,819 0.23144966%
Shasta 179,195 $444,182 0.52233669%
Anderson 10,943 $100,000 0.11759532%
Redding 92,446 $142,762 0.16788095%
Shasta Lake 10,131 $100,000 0.11759532%
Unincorporated 65,675 $101,420 0.11926510%
Sierra 3,171 $200,000 0.23519064%
Loyalton 724 $100,000 0.11759532%
Unincorporated 2,447 $100,000 0.11759532%
Siskiyou 43,409 $1,100,000 1.29354852%
Dorris 836 $100,000 0.11759532%
Dunsmuir 1,651 $100,000 0.11759532%
Etna 665 $100,000 0.11759532%
Fort Jones 674 $100,000 0.11759532%
Montague 1,199 $100,000 0.11759532%
Mount Shasta 3,203 $100,000 0.11759532%
Tulelake 870 $100,000 0.11759532%
Weed 2,710 $100,000 0.11759532%
Yreka 7,805 $100,000 0.11759532%
Unincorporated 23,796 $100,000 0.11759532%
Lake Shastina Community Services District 0 $100,000 0.11759532% Solano 446,426 $1,031,337 1.21280407%
Benicia 26,033 $100,000 0.11759532%
Dixon 19,403 $100,000 0.11759532%
Fairfield 120,339 $185,836 0.21853435%
Rio Vista 10,004 $100,000 0.11759532%
Suisun City 28,840 $100,000 0.11759532%
Vacaville 102,173 $157,783 0.18554508%
Vallejo 121,558 $187,718 0.22074804%
Unincorporated 18,076 $100,000 0.11759532%
Sonoma 478,152 $1,272,032 1.49585058%
Cloverdale 8,710 $100,000 0.11759532%
Cotati 7,303 $100,000 0.11759532%
Healdsburg 10,985 $100,000 0.11759532%
Petaluma 58,445 $100,000 0.11759532%
Rohnert Park 43,821 $100,000 0.11759532%
Santa Rosa 174,890 $270,077 0.31759838%
Sebastopol 7,295 $100,000 0.11759532%
Sonoma 10,532 $100,000 0.11759532%
Windsor 25,394 $100,000 0.11759532%

Page 18 of 37 ends

16.F.

Page 274 of 488 ends

2024-25 Enhancing Law Enforcement Activities Subaccount Citizens' Option for Public Safety
Front-line Law Enforcement Allocation for 2024-25

ATTACHMENT II
City/County
City/County
Population Estimates
1/1/2024
Projected Allocations by
City/County
Percent of Allocation by
City/County
Unincorporated 130,777 $201,955 0.23748964%
Stanislaus 548,744 $1,314,124 1.54534808%
Ceres 49,319 $100,000 0.11759532%
Hughson 7,711 $100,000 0.11759532%
Modesto 217,862 $336,438 0.39563508%
Newman 12,121 $100,000 0.11759532%
Oakdale 23,008 $100,000 0.11759532%
Patterson 24,790 $100,000 0.11759532%
Riverbank 25,006 $100,000 0.11759532%
Turlock 71,273 $110,065 0.12943101%
Waterford 9,110 $100,000 0.11759532%
Unincorporated 108,544 $167,621 0.19711475%
Sutter 100,110 $308,494 0.36277479%
Live Oak 9,668 $100,000 0.11759532%
Yuba City 70,256 $108,494 0.12758415%
Unincorporated 20,186 $100,000 0.11759532%
Tehama 64,308 $400,000 0.47038128%
Corning 8,076 $100,000 0.11759532%
Red Bluff 14,300 $100,000 0.11759532%
Tehama 422 $100,000 0.11759532%
Unincorporated 41,510 $100,000 0.11759532%
Trinity 15,915 $100,000 0.11759532%
Tulare 478,918 $1,139,874 1.34043818%
Dinuba 25,573 $100,000 0.11759532%
Exeter 10,179 $100,000 0.11759532%
Farmersville 10,327 $100,000 0.11759532%
Lindsay 12,594 $100,000 0.11759532%
Porterville 62,934 $100,000 0.11759532%
Tulare 70,799 $109,333 0.12857023%
Visalia 144,532 $223,196 0.26246858%
Woodlake 7,713 $100,000 0.11759532%
Unincorporated 134,267 $207,345 0.24382745%
Tuolumne 54,407 $200,000 0.23519064%
Sonora 5,132 $100,000 0.11759532%
Unincorporated 49,275 $100,000 0.11759532%
Ventura 823,863 $1,599,341 1.88075038%
Camarillo 69,014 $106,576 0.12532869%
Fillmore 17,061 $100,000 0.11759532%
Moorpark 35,114 $100,000 0.11759532%
Ojai 7,533 $100,000 0.11759532%
Oxnard 197,536 $305,049 0.35872328%
Port Hueneme 20,916 $100,000 0.11759532%
San Buenaventura 107,569 $166,116 0.19534416%
Santa Paula 31,355 $100,000 0.11759532%
Simi Valley 124,029 $191,534 0.22523535%
Thousand Oaks 122,643 $189,394 0.22271838%
Unincorporated 91,093 $140,672 0.16542392%
Yolo 221,666 $500,461 0.58851865%
Davis 65,054 $100,461 0.11813737%
West Sacramento 54,278 $100,000 0.11759532%
Winters 7,587 $100,000 0.11759532%

Page 19 of 37 ends

16.F.

Page 275 of 488 ends

2024-25 Enhancing Law Enforcement Activities Subaccount Citizens' Option for Public Safety
Front-line Law Enforcement Allocation for 2024-25

ATTACHMENT II
City/County
City/County
Population Estimates
1/1/2024
Projected Allocations by
City/County
Percent of Allocation by
City/County
Woodland 60,672 $100,000 0.11759532%
Unincorporated 34,075 $100,000 0.11759532%
Yuba 83,721 $303,583 0.35699994%
Marysville 12,752 $100,000 0.11759532%
Wheatland 3,893 $100,000 0.11759532%
Unincorporated 67,076 $103,583 0.12180930%
CALIFORNIA TOTAL 39,128,162 $85,037,400 100.00000000%
CALIFORNIA CITY TOTAL 32,834,405 $73,387,657 86.30044797%

Page 20 of 37 ends

16.F.

Page 276 of 488 ends

State Controller's Office
2024-2025 Enhancing Law Enforcement Activities Growth Special Account Allocations Citizens' Option for Public Safety and Juvenile Justice Based on Jan. 1, 2024, Population Estimates
Total allocation: $217,491,409.06
County
1/1/2024
Population
Percentage of
Allocation:
1/1/2024
Population
County Jail
Operation Allocation
by County
(5.15%)
District Attorney
Allocation by County
(5.15%)
Front-line Law
Enforcement
(39.7%)
Total COPS
(50%)
Juvenile Justice
Allocation by County
(50%) Total
Alameda County 1,641,869 4.19613117% $470,000.58 $470,000.58 $2,837,820.41 $3,777,821.57 $4,563,112.40 $8,340,933.97 Alpine County 1,179 0.00301318% $337.50 $337.50 $101,536.61 $102,211.61 $3,276.70 $105,488.31 Amador County 39,611 0.10123399% $11,339.02 $11,339.02 $609,219.63 $631,897.67 $110,087.62 $741,985.29 Butte County 205,928 0.52629101% $58,948.84 $58,948.84 $679,518.52 $797,416.20 $572,318.87 $1,369,735.07 Calaveras County 44,842 0.11460288% $12,836.45 $12,836.45 $203,073.21 $228,746.11 $124,625.71 $353,371.82 Colusa County 21,743 0.05556867% $6,224.14 $6,224.14 $304,609.82 $317,058.10 $60,428.54 $377,486.64 Contra Costa County 1,146,626 2.93043665% $328,232.57 $328,232.57 $2,599,499.52 $3,255,964.66 $3,186,723.98 $6,442,688.64 Del Norte County 26,345 0.06733002% $7,541.51 $7,541.51 $203,073.21 $218,156.23 $73,218.51 $291,374.74 El Dorado County 188,583 0.48196233% $53,983.67 $53,983.67 $449,645.83 $557,613.17 $524,113.33 $1,081,726.50 Fresno County 1,017,431 2.60025247% $291,249.28 $291,249.28 $2,623,742.36 $3,206,240.92 $2,827,662.87 $6,033,903.79 Glenn County 28,736 0.07344071% $8,225.95 $8,225.95 $304,609.82 $321,061.72 $79,863.62 $400,925.34 Humboldt County 133,100 0.34016420% $38,101.14 $38,101.14 $820,933.29 $897,135.57 $369,913.96 $1,267,049.53 Imperial County 182,881 0.46738970% $52,351.42 $52,351.42 $812,292.85 $916,995.69 $508,266.22 $1,425,261.91 Inyo County 18,856 0.04819035% $5,397.71 $5,397.71 $203,073.21 $213,868.63 $52,404.94 $266,273.57 Kern County 910,300 2.32645735% $260,582.01 $260,582.01 $2,339,367.60 $2,860,531.62 $2,529,922.43 $5,390,454.05 Kings County 152,627 0.39006943% $43,690.93 $43,690.93 $507,683.02 $595,064.88 $424,183.75 $1,019,248.63 Lake County 67,001 0.17123472% $19,179.67 $19,179.67 $304,609.82 $342,969.16 $186,210.41 $529,179.57 Lassen County 28,197 0.07206319% $8,071.66 $8,071.66 $203,073.21 $219,216.53 $78,365.62 $297,582.15 Los Angeles County 9,824,091 25.10746863% $2,812,239.23 $2,812,239.23 $18,886,488.12 $24,510,966.58 $27,303,293.62 $51,814,260.20 Madera County 159,328 0.40719521% $45,609.15 $45,609.15 $321,680.60 $412,898.90 $442,807.30 $855,706.20 Marin County 252,844 0.64619442% $72,378.99 $72,378.99 $1,220,657.18 $1,365,415.16 $702,708.68 $2,068,123.84 Mariposa County 16,966 0.04336007% $4,856.68 $4,856.68 $101,536.61 $111,249.97 $47,152.22 $158,402.19 Mendocino County 89,476 0.22867417% $25,613.35 $25,613.35 $507,683.02 $558,909.72 $248,673.34 $807,583.06 Merced County 287,303 0.73426143% $82,243.21 $82,243.21 $794,049.91 $958,536.33 $798,477.76 $1,757,014.09 Modoc County 8,484 0.02168259% $2,428.63 $2,428.63 $203,073.21 $207,930.47 $23,578.89 $231,509.36 Mono County 12,861 0.03286891% $3,681.58 $3,681.58 $203,073.21 $210,436.37 $35,743.53 $246,179.90 Monterey County 437,614 1.11841185% $125,271.16 $125,271.16 $1,536,140.25 $1,786,682.57 $1,216,224.84 $3,002,907.41 Napa County 135,029 0.34509415% $38,653.33 $38,653.33 $628,691.82 $705,998.48 $375,275.07 $1,081,273.55 Nevada County 100,177 0.25602276% $28,676.62 $28,676.62 $409,120.11 $466,473.35 $278,413.75 $744,887.10 Orange County 3,150,835 8.05260160% $901,956.41 $901,956.41 $5,733,905.49 $7,537,818.31 $8,756,858.34 $16,294,676.65 Placer County 412,844 1.05510706% $118,180.51 $118,180.51 $935,826.05 $1,172,187.07 $1,147,383.61 $2,319,570.68 Plumas County 18,841 0.04815202% $5,393.41 $5,393.41 $203,073.21 $213,860.03 $52,363.25 $266,223.28 Riverside County 2,442,378 6.24199522% $699,153.87 $699,153.87 $4,632,262.72 $6,030,570.46 $6,787,901.67 $12,818,472.13 Sacramento County 1,578,938 4.03529816% $451,985.98 $451,985.98 $2,637,213.66 $3,541,185.62 $4,388,213.41 $7,929,399.03

Page 21 of 37 ends

16.F.

Page 277 of 488 ends

San Benito County 65,853 0.16830078% $18,851.05 $18,851.05 $304,609.82 $342,311.92 $183,019.86 $525,331.78 San Bernardino County 2,181,433 5.57509704% $624,455.89 $624,455.89 $4,082,790.17 $5,331,701.95 $6,062,678.55 $11,394,380.50 San Diego County 3,291,101 8.41107998% $942,108.88 $942,108.88 $5,578,826.29 $7,463,044.05 $9,146,688.18 $16,609,732.23 San Francisco County 843,071 2.15463992% $241,337.07 $241,337.07 $1,321,934.90 $1,804,609.04 $2,343,078.37 $4,147,687.41 San Joaquin County 791,408 2.02260459% $226,548.05 $226,548.05 $1,508,954.95 $1,962,051.05 $2,199,495.61 $4,161,546.66 San Luis Obispo County 278,469 0.71168434% $79,714.39 $79,714.39 $899,025.94 $1,058,454.72 $773,926.15 $1,832,380.87 San Mateo County 741,565 1.89522063% $212,280.02 $212,280.02 $2,378,698.62 $2,803,258.66 $2,060,971.03 $4,864,229.69 Santa Barbara County 443,623 1.13376907% $126,991.29 $126,991.29 $1,135,197.22 $1,389,179.80 $1,232,925.17 $2,622,104.97 Santa Clara County 1,903,198 4.86401073% $544,808.48 $544,808.48 $3,400,446.14 $4,490,063.10 $5,289,402.74 $9,779,465.84 Santa Cruz County 262,572 0.67105631% $75,163.73 $75,163.73 $605,989.53 $756,316.99 $729,744.91 $1,486,061.90 Shasta County 179,195 0.45796938% $51,296.27 $51,296.27 $451,006.86 $553,599.40 $498,022.03 $1,051,621.43 Sierra County 3,171 0.00810414% $907.73 $907.73 $203,073.21 $204,888.67 $8,812.90 $213,701.57 Siskiyou County 43,409 0.11094055% $12,426.24 $12,426.24 $1,116,902.66 $1,141,755.14 $120,643.09 $1,262,398.23 Solano County 446,426 1.14093271% $127,793.68 $127,793.68 $1,047,184.61 $1,302,771.97 $1,240,715.32 $2,543,487.29 Sonoma County 478,152 1.22201498% $136,875.55 $136,875.55 $1,291,578.54 $1,565,329.64 $1,328,888.80 $2,894,218.44 Stanislaus County 548,744 1.40242723% $157,083.18 $157,083.18 $1,334,316.71 $1,648,483.07 $1,525,079.38 $3,173,562.45 Sutter County 100,110 0.25585153% $28,657.44 $28,657.44 $313,234.58 $370,549.46 $278,227.55 $648,777.01 Tehama County 64,308 0.16435221% $18,408.78 $18,408.78 $406,146.42 $442,963.98 $178,725.97 $621,689.95 Trinity County 15,915 0.04067403% $4,555.82 $4,555.82 $101,536.61 $110,648.25 $44,231.26 $154,879.51 Tulare County 478,918 1.22397265% $137,094.82 $137,094.82 $1,157,389.11 $1,431,578.75 $1,331,017.68 $2,762,596.43 Tuolumne County 54,407 0.13904819% $15,574.52 $15,574.52 $203,073.21 $234,222.25 $151,208.93 $385,431.18 Ventura County 823,863 2.10554996% $235,838.60 $235,838.60 $1,623,916.77 $2,095,593.97 $2,289,695.14 $4,385,289.11 Yolo County 221,666 0.56651268% $63,454.00 $63,454.00 $508,151.06 $635,059.06 $616,058.21 $1,251,117.27 Yuba County 83,721 0.21396609% $23,965.93 $23,965.93 $308,248.35 $356,180.21 $232,678.94 $588,859.15 Total 39,128,162 100.00000000% $11,200,807.57 $11,200,807.57 $86,344,089.39 $108,745,704.53 $108,745,704.53 $217,491,409.06 State Controller's Office
2024-2025 Enhancing Law Enforcement Activities Growth Special Account Allocations Citizens' Option for Public Safety and Juvenile Justice Based on Jan. 1, 2024, Population Estimates
Total allocation: $217,491,409.06
County
1/1/2024
Population
Percentage of
Allocation:
1/1/2024
Population
County Jail
Operation Allocation
by County
(5.15%)
District Attorney
Allocation by County
(5.15%)
Front-line Law
Enforcement
(39.7%)
Total COPS
(50%)
Juvenile Justice
Allocation by County
(50%) Total

Page 22 of 37 ends

16.F.

Page 278 of 488 ends

State Controller's Office
2024-2025 Enhancing Law Enforcement Activities Growth Special Account Citizens' Option for Public Safety - Front-line Law Enforcement Front-line Law Enforcement City Allocation
Filter City/County
City/County
Population
Estimates
1/1/2024
Projected
Allocation by
City/County
Percent of
Allocation by
City/County
Front-line Law
Enforcement
$86,344,089.39
Alameda County Alameda County 1,641,869 $2,794,874.21 3.28664118% $2,837,820.41 Alameda County Alameda 78,071 $120,562.71 0.14177610% $122,415.28 Alameda County Albany 20,325 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Alameda County Berkeley 125,327 $193,538.74 0.22759249% $196,512.66 Alameda County Dublin 72,917 $112,603.55 0.13241650% $114,333.82 Alameda County Emeryville 13,314 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Alameda County Fremont 229,250 $354,023.93 0.41631556% $359,463.88 Alameda County Hayward 159,770 $246,728.04 0.29014062% $250,519.28 Alameda County Livermore 84,828 $130,997.35 0.15404675% $133,010.26 Alameda County Newark 46,635 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Alameda County Oakland 425,093 $656,458.43 0.77196437% $666,545.61 Alameda County Piedmont 10,782 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Alameda County Pleasanton 75,960 $117,302.76 0.13794255% $119,105.24 Alameda County San Leandro 87,098 $134,502.84 0.15816904% $136,569.62 Alameda County Union City 66,432 $102,588.95 0.12063980% $104,165.34 Alameda County Unincorporated 146,067 $225,566.91 0.26525612% $229,032.98 Alpine County Alpine County 1,179 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Alpine County Unincorporated 1,179 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Amador County Amador County 39,611 $600,000.00 0.70557192% $609,219.63 Amador County Amador 193 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Amador County Ione 8,856 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Amador County Jackson 4,867 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Amador County Plymouth 1,061 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Amador County Sutter Creek 2,553 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Amador County Unincorporated 22,081 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.58 Butte County Butte County 205,928 $669,235.02 0.78698906% $679,518.52 Butte County Biggs 1,853 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Butte County Chico 109,589 $169,235.02 0.19901246% $171,835.50 Butte County Gridley 6,935 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Butte County Oroville 18,129 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Butte County Paradise 10,691 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Butte County Unincorporated 58,731 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.58 Calaveras County Calaveras County 44,842 $200,000.00 0.23519064% $203,073.21 Calaveras County Angels Camp 3,587 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Calaveras County Unincorporated 41,255 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.60 Colusa County Colusa County 21,743 $300,000.00 0.35278596% $304,609.82 Colusa County Colusa 6,447 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Colusa County Williams 5,528 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Colusa County Unincorporated 9,768 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.60 Contra Costa County Contra Costa County 1,146,626 $2,560,159.96 3.01062826% $2,599,499.52 Contra Costa County Antioch 115,632 $178,567.05 0.20998649% $181,310.92 Contra Costa County Brentwood 64,811 $100,085.69 0.11769608% $101,623.61 Contra Costa County Clayton 10,683 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61

Page 23 of 37 ends

16.F.

Page 279 of 488 ends

Contra Costa County Concord 121,513 $187,648.90 0.22066632% $190,532.32 Contra Costa County Danville 42,567 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Contra Costa County El Cerrito 25,700 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Contra Costa County Hercules 26,063 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Contra Costa County Lafayette 24,808 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Contra Costa County Martinez 36,439 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Contra Costa County Moraga 16,784 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Contra Costa County Oakley 45,736 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Contra Costa County Orinda 19,191 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Contra Costa County Pinole 18,192 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Contra Costa County Pittsburg 75,085 $115,951.52 0.13635356% $117,733.24 Contra Costa County Pleasant Hill 33,352 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Contra Costa County Richmond 112,735 $174,093.30 0.20472557% $176,768.43 Contra Costa County San Pablo 31,088 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Contra Costa County San Ramon 82,525 $127,440.89 0.14986452% $129,399.16 Contra Costa County Walnut Creek 69,433 $107,223.31 0.12608959% $108,870.91 Contra Costa County Kensington Police District 0 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Contra Costa County Unincorporated 174,289 $269,149.30 0.31650697% $273,285.00 Del Norte County Del Norte County 26,345 $200,000.00 0.23519064% $203,073.21 Del Norte County Crescent City 5,564 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Del Norte County Unincorporated 20,781 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.60 El Dorado County El Dorado County 188,583 $442,841.11 0.52076041% $449,645.83 El Dorado County Placerville 10,540 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 El Dorado County South Lake Tahoe 20,790 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 El Dorado County Unincorporated 157,253 $242,841.11 0.28556977% $246,572.61 Fresno County Fresno County 1,017,431 $2,584,035.93 3.03870528% $2,623,742.36 Fresno County Clovis 126,133 $194,783.43 0.22905619% $197,776.48 Fresno County Coalinga 17,107 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Fresno County Firebaugh 8,415 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Fresno County Fowler 7,367 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Fresno County Fresno 546,971 $844,670.99 0.99329353% $857,650.25 Fresno County Huron 6,348 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Fresno County Kerman 17,256 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Fresno County Kingsburg 13,042 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Fresno County Mendota 12,531 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Fresno County Orange Cove 9,516 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Fresno County Parlier 14,368 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Fresno County Reedley 25,653 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Fresno County Sanger 26,357 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Fresno County San Joaquin 3,616 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Fresno County Selma 24,371 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Fresno County Unincorporated 158,380 $244,581.51 0.28761640% $248,339.70 Glenn County Glenn County 28,736 $300,000.00 0.35278596% $304,609.82 State Controller's Office
2024-2025 Enhancing Law Enforcement Activities Growth Special Account Citizens' Option for Public Safety - Front-line Law Enforcement Front-line Law Enforcement City Allocation
Filter City/County
City/County
Population
Estimates
1/1/2024
Projected
Allocation by
City/County
Percent of
Allocation by
City/County
Front-line Law
Enforcement
$86,344,089.39

Page 24 of 37 ends

16.F.

Page 280 of 488 ends

Glenn County Orland 8,537 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Glenn County Willows 6,321 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Glenn County Unincorporated 13,878 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.60 Humboldt County Humboldt County 133,100 $808,509.69 0.95076955% $820,933.29 Humboldt County Arcata 18,540 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Humboldt County Blue Lake 1,149 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Humboldt County Eureka 26,073 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Humboldt County Ferndale 1,356 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Humboldt County Fortuna 12,181 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Humboldt County Rio Dell 3,241 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Humboldt County Trinidad 294 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Humboldt County Unincorporated 70,266 $108,509.69 0.12760231% $110,177.02 Imperial County Imperial County 182,881 $800,000.00 0.94076256% $812,292.85 Imperial County Brawley 28,345 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Imperial County Calexico 39,262 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Imperial County Calipatria 6,342 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Imperial County El Centro 44,952 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Imperial County Holtville 5,583 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Imperial County Imperial 22,141 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Imperial County Westmorland 2,050 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Imperial County Unincorporated 34,206 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.58 Inyo County Inyo County 18,856 $200,000.00 0.23519064% $203,073.21 Inyo County Bishop 3,848 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Inyo County Unincorporated 15,008 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.60 Kern County Kern County 910,300 $2,303,964.76 2.70935470% $2,339,367.60 Kern County Arvin 19,651 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Kern County Bakersfield 411,109 $634,863.36 0.74656958% $644,618.71 Kern County California City 13,079 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Kern County Delano 52,484 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Kern County Maricopa 1,004 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Kern County Mcfarland 13,965 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Kern County Ridgecrest 27,940 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Kern County Shafter 22,226 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Kern County Taft 6,953 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Kern County Tehachapi 11,092 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Kern County Wasco 27,028 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Kern County Stallion Springs District 0 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Kern County Bear Valley District 0 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Kern County Unincorporated 303,769 $469,101.40 0.55164128% $476,309.57 Kings County Kings County 152,627 $500,000.00 0.58797660% $507,683.02 Kings County Avenal 13,981 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Kings County Corcoran 21,633 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Kings County Hanford 59,286 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 State Controller's Office
2024-2025 Enhancing Law Enforcement Activities Growth Special Account Citizens' Option for Public Safety - Front-line Law Enforcement Front-line Law Enforcement City Allocation
Filter City/County
City/County
Population
Estimates
1/1/2024
Projected
Allocation by
City/County
Percent of
Allocation by
City/County
Front-line Law
Enforcement
$86,344,089.39

Page 25 of 37 ends

16.F.

Page 281 of 488 ends

Kings County Lemoore 26,855 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Kings County Unincorporated 30,872 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.58 Lake County Lake County 67,001 $300,000.00 0.35278596% $304,609.82 Lake County Clearlake 16,553 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Lake County Lakeport 4,982 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Lake County Unincorporated 45,466 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.60 Lassen County Lassen County 28,197 $200,000.00 0.23519064% $203,073.21 Lassen County Susanville 11,639 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Lassen County Unincorporated 16,558 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.60 Los Angeles County Los Angeles County 9,824,091 $18,600,669.18 21.87351491% $18,886,488.12 Los Angeles County Agoura Hills 19,841 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Los Angeles County Alhambra 81,811 $126,338.29 0.14856791% $128,279.61 Los Angeles County Arcadia 55,783 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Los Angeles County Artesia 16,019 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Los Angeles County Avalon 3,313 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Los Angeles County Azusa 49,420 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Los Angeles County Baldwin Park 70,660 $109,118.13 0.12831781% $110,794.84 Los Angeles County Bell 33,301 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Los Angeles County Bellflower 76,990 $118,893.36 0.13981302% $120,720.28 Los Angeles County Bell Gardens 38,381 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Los Angeles County Beverly Hills 31,806 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Los Angeles County Bradbury 898 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Los Angeles County Burbank 105,603 $163,079.56 0.19177393% $165,585.45 Los Angeles County Calabasas 22,742 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Los Angeles County Carson 91,924 $141,955.49 0.16693301% $144,136.79 Los Angeles County Cerritos 47,806 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Los Angeles County Claremont 37,686 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Los Angeles County Commerce 12,124 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Los Angeles County Compton 93,671 $144,653.33 0.17010554% $146,876.08 Los Angeles County Covina 50,485 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Los Angeles County Cudahy 22,210 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Los Angeles County Culver City 40,213 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Los Angeles County Diamond Bar 53,335 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Los Angeles County Downey 111,493 $172,175.31 0.20247010% $174,820.96 Los Angeles County Duarte 23,656 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Los Angeles County El Monte 106,786 $164,906.43 0.19392224% $167,440.39 Los Angeles County El Segundo 16,964 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Los Angeles County Gardena 60,028 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Los Angeles County Glendale 191,586 $295,860.54 0.34791814% $300,406.75 Los Angeles County Glendora 51,209 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Los Angeles County Hawaiian Gardens 13,560 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Los Angeles County Hawthorne 85,566 $132,137.02 0.15538695% $134,167.45 Los Angeles County Hermosa Beach 19,088 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 State Controller's Office
2024-2025 Enhancing Law Enforcement Activities Growth Special Account Citizens' Option for Public Safety - Front-line Law Enforcement Front-line Law Enforcement City Allocation
Filter City/County
City/County
Population
Estimates
1/1/2024
Projected
Allocation by
City/County
Percent of
Allocation by
City/County
Front-line Law
Enforcement
$86,344,089.39

Page 26 of 37 ends

16.F.

Page 282 of 488 ends

Los Angeles County Hidden Hills 1,727 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Los Angeles County Huntington Park 53,219 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Los Angeles County Industry 426 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Los Angeles County Inglewood 106,065 $163,793.01 0.19261291% $166,309.86 Los Angeles County Irwindale 1,499 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Los Angeles County La Canada Flintridge 20,048 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Los Angeles County La Habra Heights 5,488 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Los Angeles County Lakewood 80,162 $123,791.78 0.14557334% $125,693.97 Los Angeles County La Mirada 48,077 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Los Angeles County Lancaster 172,631 $266,588.90 0.31349606% $270,685.32 Los Angeles County La Puente 37,459 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Los Angeles County La Verne 31,697 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Los Angeles County Lawndale 30,855 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Los Angeles County Lomita 20,320 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Los Angeles County Long Beach 458,813 $708,531.22 0.83319953% $719,418.55 Los Angeles County Los Angeles 3,814,318 $5,890,337.42 6.92676095% $5,980,848.67 Los Angeles County Lynwood 66,271 $102,340.33 0.12034744% $103,912.90 Los Angeles County Malibu 10,621 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Los Angeles County Manhattan Beach 34,195 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Los Angeles County Maywood 24,451 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Los Angeles County Monrovia 38,087 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Los Angeles County Montebello 61,930 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Los Angeles County Monterey Park 59,347 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Los Angeles County Norwalk 101,172 $156,236.90 0.18372728% $158,637.65 Los Angeles County Palmdale 166,055 $256,433.78 0.30155412% $260,374.16 Los Angeles County Palos Verdes Estates 12,974 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Los Angeles County Paramount 52,153 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Los Angeles County Pasadena 139,692 $215,722.19 0.25367919% $219,036.99 Los Angeles County Pico Rivera 60,820 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Los Angeles County Pomona 152,166 $234,985.41 0.27633184% $238,596.21 Los Angeles County Rancho Palos Verdes 40,919 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Los Angeles County Redondo Beach 68,239 $105,379.45 0.12392130% $106,998.72 Los Angeles County Rolling Hills 1,677 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Los Angeles County Rolling Hills Estates 8,534 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Los Angeles County Rosemead 50,541 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Los Angeles County San Dimas 33,920 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Los Angeles County San Fernando 23,643 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Los Angeles County San Gabriel 38,613 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Los Angeles County San Marino 12,379 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Los Angeles County Santa Clarita 230,428 $355,843.08 0.41845480% $361,310.99 Los Angeles County Santa Fe Springs 18,640 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Los Angeles County Santa Monica 92,912 $143,481.23 0.16872721% $145,685.97 Los Angeles County Sierra Madre 10,909 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 State Controller's Office
2024-2025 Enhancing Law Enforcement Activities Growth Special Account Citizens' Option for Public Safety - Front-line Law Enforcement Front-line Law Enforcement City Allocation
Filter City/County
City/County
Population
Estimates
1/1/2024
Projected
Allocation by
City/County
Percent of
Allocation by
City/County
Front-line Law
Enforcement
$86,344,089.39

Page 27 of 37 ends

16.F.

Page 283 of 488 ends

Los Angeles County Signal Hill 11,448 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Los Angeles County South El Monte 19,441 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Los Angeles County South Gate 92,729 $143,198.63 0.16839488% $145,399.03 Los Angeles County South Pasadena 26,270 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Los Angeles County Temple City 35,975 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Los Angeles County Torrance 142,910 $220,691.65 0.25952305% $224,082.81 Los Angeles County Vernon 205 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Los Angeles County Walnut 27,867 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Los Angeles County West Covina 109,105 $168,487.59 0.19813352% $171,076.58 Los Angeles County West Hollywood 35,075 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Los Angeles County Westlake Village 7,902 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Los Angeles County Whittier 87,527 $135,165.33 0.15894810% $137,242.29 Los Angeles County Unincorporated 997,587 $1,540,543.82 1.81160622% $1,564,215.64 Madera County Madera County 159,328 $316,812.44 0.37255659% $321,680.60 Madera County Chowchilla 18,930 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Madera County Madera 66,560 $102,786.62 0.12087225% $104,366.04 Madera County Unincorporated 73,838 $114,025.82 0.13408902% $115,777.95 Marin County Marin County 252,844 $1,202,184.36 1.41371254% $1,220,657.18 Marin County Belvedere 2,043 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Marin County Corte Madera 9,882 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Marin County Fairfax 7,371 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Marin County Larkspur 12,655 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Marin County Mill Valley 13,635 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Marin County Novato 51,140 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Marin County Ross 2,272 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Marin County San Anselmo 12,426 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Marin County San Rafael 59,585 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Marin County Sausalito 6,856 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Marin County Tiburon 8,809 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Marin County Unincorporated 66,170 $102,184.36 0.12016402% $103,754.47 Mariposa County Mariposa County 16,966 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Mariposa County Unincorporated 16,966 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Mendocino County Mendocino County 89,476 $500,000.00 0.58797660% $507,683.02 Mendocino County Fort Bragg 7,179 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Mendocino County Point Arena 445 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Mendocino County Ukiah 16,108 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Mendocino County Willits 4,830 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Mendocino County Unincorporated 60,914 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.58 Merced County Merced County 287,303 $782,033.15 0.91963438% $794,049.91 Merced County Atwater 31,397 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Merced County Dos Palos 5,633 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Merced County Gustine 5,936 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Merced County Livingston 14,286 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 State Controller's Office
2024-2025 Enhancing Law Enforcement Activities Growth Special Account Citizens' Option for Public Safety - Front-line Law Enforcement Front-line Law Enforcement City Allocation
Filter City/County
City/County
Population
Estimates
1/1/2024
Projected
Allocation by
City/County
Percent of
Allocation by
City/County
Front-line Law
Enforcement
$86,344,089.39

Page 28 of 37 ends

16.F.

Page 284 of 488 ends

Merced County Los Banos 47,419 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Merced County Merced 91,837 $141,821.14 0.16677502% $144,000.37 Merced County Unincorporated 90,795 $140,212.01 0.16488276% $142,366.49 Modoc County Modoc County 8,484 $200,000.00 0.23519064% $203,073.21 Modoc County Alturas 2,659 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Modoc County Unincorporated 5,825 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.60 Mono County Mono County 12,861 $200,000.00 0.23519064% $203,073.21 Mono County Mammoth Lakes 7,110 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Mono County Unincorporated 5,751 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.60 Monterey County Monterey County 437,614 $1,512,893.05 1.77909141% $1,536,140.25 Monterey County Carmel-By-The-Sea 3,122 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Monterey County Del Rey Oaks 1,569 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Monterey County Gonzales 8,466 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Monterey County Greenfield 20,561 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Monterey County King City 14,216 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Monterey County Marina 22,695 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Monterey County Monterey 27,106 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Monterey County Pacific Grove 14,966 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Monterey County Salinas 162,037 $250,228.90 0.29425747% $254,073.93 Monterey County Sand City 379 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Monterey County Seaside 30,197 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Monterey County Soledad 26,966 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Monterey County Unincorporated 105,334 $162,664.15 0.19128542% $165,163.61 Napa County Napa County 135,029 $619,177.50 0.72812376% $628,691.82 Napa County American Canyon 21,758 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Napa County Calistoga 5,142 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Napa County Napa 77,174 $119,177.50 0.14014716% $121,008.79 Napa County St Helena 5,314 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Napa County Yountville 2,781 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Napa County Unincorporated 22,860 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.59 Nevada County Nevada County 100,177 $402,928.69 0.47382528% $409,120.11 Nevada County Grass Valley 13,400 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Nevada County Nevada City 3,347 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Nevada County Truckee 16,778 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Nevada County Unincorporated 66,652 $102,928.69 0.12103932% $104,510.28 Orange County Orange County 3,150,835 $5,647,131.36 6.64076207% $5,733,905.49 Orange County Aliso Viejo 50,068 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Orange County Anaheim 340,160 $525,298.93 0.61772694% $533,370.70 Orange County Brea 47,725 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Orange County Buena Park 82,689 $127,694.15 0.15016234% $129,656.31 Orange County Costa Mesa 109,423 $168,978.67 0.19871100% $171,575.20 Orange County Cypress 49,345 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Orange County Dana Point 32,596 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 State Controller's Office
2024-2025 Enhancing Law Enforcement Activities Growth Special Account Citizens' Option for Public Safety - Front-line Law Enforcement Front-line Law Enforcement City Allocation
Filter City/County
City/County
Population
Estimates
1/1/2024
Projected
Allocation by
City/County
Percent of
Allocation by
City/County
Front-line Law
Enforcement
$86,344,089.39

Page 29 of 37 ends

16.F.

Page 285 of 488 ends

Orange County Fountain Valley 56,333 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Orange County Fullerton 140,311 $216,678.09 0.25480329% $220,007.58 Orange County Garden Grove 171,024 $264,107.26 0.31057777% $268,165.55 Orange County Huntington Beach 192,503 $297,276.64 0.34958341% $301,844.61 Orange County Irvine 314,550 $485,750.17 0.57121945% $493,214.23 Orange County Laguna Beach 22,449 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Orange County Laguna Hills 30,315 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Orange County Laguna Niguel 64,291 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Orange County Laguna Woods 17,148 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Orange County La Habra 60,901 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Orange County Lake Forest 86,917 $134,223.33 0.15784035% $136,285.81 Orange County La Palma 15,071 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Orange County Los Alamitos 11,947 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Orange County Mission Viejo 91,304 $140,998.04 0.16580709% $143,164.62 Orange County Newport Beach 82,419 $127,277.20 0.14967203% $129,232.95 Orange County Orange 138,621 $214,068.27 0.25173426% $217,357.65 Orange County Placentia 52,226 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Orange County Rancho Santa Margarita 46,305 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Orange County San Clemente 62,297 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Orange County San Juan Capistrano 34,992 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Orange County Santa Ana 310,797 $479,954.53 0.56440405% $487,329.54 Orange County Seal Beach 24,350 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Orange County Stanton 40,297 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Orange County Tustin 78,844 $121,756.44 0.14317987% $123,627.35 Orange County Villa Park 5,705 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Orange County Westminster 89,490 $138,196.74 0.16251289% $140,320.28 Orange County Yorba Linda 66,087 $102,056.18 0.12001329% $103,624.38 Orange County Unincorporated 131,335 $202,816.72 0.23850296% $205,933.14 Placer County Placer County 412,844 $921,663.72 1.08383339% $935,826.05 Placer County Auburn 13,218 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Placer County Colfax 1,988 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Placer County Lincoln 53,231 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Placer County Loomis 6,601 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Placer County Rocklin 71,609 $110,583.64 0.13004118% $112,282.87 Placer County Roseville 154,329 $238,325.67 0.28025983% $241,987.80 Placer County Unincorporated 111,868 $172,754.41 0.20315110% $175,408.94 Plumas County Plumas County 18,841 $200,000.00 0.23519064% $203,073.21 Plumas County Portola 2,075 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Plumas County Unincorporated 16,766 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.60 Riverside County Riverside County 2,442,378 $4,562,160.29 5.36488691% $4,632,262.72 Riverside County Banning 31,213 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Riverside County Beaumont 57,416 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Riverside County Blythe 17,378 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 State Controller's Office
2024-2025 Enhancing Law Enforcement Activities Growth Special Account Citizens' Option for Public Safety - Front-line Law Enforcement Front-line Law Enforcement City Allocation
Filter City/County
City/County
Population
Estimates
1/1/2024
Projected
Allocation by
City/County
Percent of
Allocation by
City/County
Front-line Law
Enforcement
$86,344,089.39

Page 30 of 37 ends

16.F.

Page 286 of 488 ends

Riverside County Calimesa 10,867 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Riverside County Canyon Lake 10,832 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Riverside County Cathedral City 50,911 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Riverside County Coachella 43,173 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Riverside County Corona 156,615 $241,855.87 0.28441118% $245,572.24 Riverside County Desert Hot Springs 32,654 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Riverside County Eastvale 68,884 $106,375.50 0.12509261% $108,010.07 Riverside County Hemet 89,663 $138,463.89 0.16282705% $140,591.53 Riverside County Indian Wells 4,797 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Riverside County Indio 90,680 $140,034.42 0.16467392% $142,186.20 Riverside County Jurupa Valley 104,721 $161,717.51 0.19017222% $164,202.47 Riverside County Lake Elsinore 71,452 $110,341.19 0.12975607% $112,036.70 Riverside County La Quinta 38,370 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Riverside County Menifee 111,560 $172,278.78 0.20259178% $174,926.03 Riverside County Moreno Valley 207,146 $319,889.38 0.37617493% $324,804.82 Riverside County Murrieta 109,177 $168,598.78 0.19826427% $171,189.48 Riverside County Norco 25,068 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Riverside County Palm Desert 50,889 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Riverside County Palm Springs 43,791 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Riverside County Perris 79,311 $122,477.61 0.14402793% $124,359.60 Riverside County Rancho Mirage 16,992 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Riverside County Riverside 316,690 $489,054.91 0.57510567% $496,569.75 Riverside County San Jacinto 53,538 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Riverside County Temecula 108,700 $167,862.16 0.19739804% $170,441.54 Riverside County Wildomar 36,327 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Riverside County Unincorporated 403,563 $623,210.29 0.73286612% $632,786.53 Sacramento County Sacramento County 1,578,938 $2,597,303.36 3.05430712% $2,637,213.66 Sacramento County Citrus Heights 85,554 $132,118.49 0.15536516% $134,148.63 Sacramento County Elk Grove 178,679 $275,928.65 0.32447917% $280,168.58 Sacramento County Folsom 88,023 $135,931.29 0.15984883% $138,020.02 Sacramento County Galt 25,785 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Sacramento County Isleton 767 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Sacramento County Rancho Cordova 82,109 $126,798.48 0.14910907% $128,746.87 Sacramento County Sacramento 520,407 $803,648.99 0.94505358% $815,997.91 Sacramento County Unincorporated 597,614 $922,877.46 1.08526067% $937,058.43 San Benito County San Benito County 65,853 $300,000.00 0.35278596% $304,609.82 San Benito County Hollister 42,872 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 San Benito County San Juan Bautista 2,032 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 San Benito County Unincorporated 20,949 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.60 San Bernardino County San Bernardino County 2,181,433 $4,021,003.20 4.72851148% $4,082,790.17 San Bernardino County Adelanto 36,131 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 San Bernardino County Apple Valley 74,322 $114,773.25 0.13496797% $116,536.86 San Bernardino County Barstow 24,669 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 State Controller's Office
2024-2025 Enhancing Law Enforcement Activities Growth Special Account Citizens' Option for Public Safety - Front-line Law Enforcement Front-line Law Enforcement City Allocation
Filter City/County
City/County
Population
Estimates
1/1/2024
Projected
Allocation by
City/County
Percent of
Allocation by
City/County
Front-line Law
Enforcement
$86,344,089.39

Page 31 of 37 ends

16.F.

Page 287 of 488 ends

San Bernardino County Big Bear Lake 4,958 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 San Bernardino County Chino 92,585 $142,976.25 0.16813337% $145,173.23 San Bernardino County Chino Hills 76,414 $118,003.86 0.13876701% $119,817.11 San Bernardino County Colton 52,778 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 San Bernardino County Fontana 214,223 $330,818.18 0.38902669% $335,901.55 San Bernardino County Grand Terrace 12,771 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 San Bernardino County Hesperia 100,087 $154,561.37 0.18175693% $156,936.37 San Bernardino County Highland 55,676 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 San Bernardino County Loma Linda 24,965 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 San Bernardino County Montclair 37,211 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 San Bernardino County Needles 4,769 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 San Bernardino County Ontario 181,224 $279,858.81 0.32910085% $284,159.13 San Bernardino County Rancho Cucamonga 173,316 $267,646.72 0.31474001% $271,759.40 San Bernardino County Redlands 72,696 $112,262.26 0.13201516% $113,987.29 San Bernardino County Rialto 103,097 $159,209.62 0.18722306% $161,656.05 San Bernardino County San Bernardino 226,541 $349,840.50 0.41139604% $355,216.16 San Bernardino County Twentynine Palms 25,346 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 San Bernardino County Upland 78,285 $120,893.19 0.14216473% $122,750.84 San Bernardino County Victorville 138,202 $213,421.22 0.25097336% $216,700.66 San Bernardino County Yucaipa 53,810 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 San Bernardino County Yucca Valley 21,594 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 San Bernardino County Unincorporated 295,763 $456,737.97 0.53710246% $463,756.20 San Diego County San Diego County 3,291,101 $5,494,399.06 6.46115602% $5,578,826.29 San Diego County Carlsbad 114,319 $176,539.42 0.20760209% $179,252.13 San Diego County Chula Vista 278,247 $429,688.54 0.50529360% $436,291.16 San Diego County Coronado 21,589 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 San Diego County Del Mar 3,919 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 San Diego County El Cajon 104,180 $160,882.06 0.18918977% $163,354.18 San Diego County Encinitas 61,028 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 San Diego County Escondido 150,002 $231,643.61 0.27240204% $235,203.06 San Diego County Imperial Beach 26,096 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 San Diego County La Mesa 60,620 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 San Diego County Lemon Grove 27,568 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 San Diego County National City 58,555 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 San Diego County Oceanside 171,483 $264,816.08 0.31141131% $268,885.26 San Diego County Poway 49,273 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 San Diego County San Diego 1,385,379 $2,139,399.43 2.51583354% $2,172,273.56 San Diego County San Marcos 95,998 $148,246.85 0.17433135% $150,524.82 San Diego County Santee 59,195 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 San Diego County Solana Beach 12,887 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 San Diego County Vista 99,723 $153,999.25 0.18109591% $156,365.61 San Diego County Unincorporated 511,040 $789,183.82 0.92804321% $801,310.41 San Francisco County San Francisco County 843,071 $1,301,929.38 1.53100798% $1,321,934.90 State Controller's Office
2024-2025 Enhancing Law Enforcement Activities Growth Special Account Citizens' Option for Public Safety - Front-line Law Enforcement Front-line Law Enforcement City Allocation
Filter City/County
City/County
Population
Estimates
1/1/2024
Projected
Allocation by
City/County
Percent of
Allocation by
City/County
Front-line Law
Enforcement
$86,344,089.39

Page 32 of 37 ends

16.F.

Page 288 of 488 ends

San Francisco County San Francisco 843,071 $1,301,929.38 1.53100798% $1,321,934.90 San Joaquin County San Joaquin County 791,408 $1,486,119.17 1.74760656% $1,508,954.95 San Joaquin County Escalon 7,249 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 San Joaquin County Lathrop 37,033 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 San Joaquin County Lodi 66,492 $102,681.61 0.12074876% $104,259.42 San Joaquin County Manteca 90,917 $140,400.41 0.16510431% $142,557.81 San Joaquin County Mountain House 28,063 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 San Joaquin County Ripon 15,741 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 San Joaquin County Stockton 317,204 $489,848.67 0.57603910% $497,375.72 San Joaquin County Tracy 96,609 $149,190.39 0.17544091% $151,482.86 San Joaquin County Unincorporated 132,100 $203,998.09 0.23989220% $207,132.70 San Luis Obispo County San Luis Obispo County 278,469 $885,420.52 1.04121309% $899,025.94 San Luis Obispo County Arroyo Grande 17,941 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 San Luis Obispo County Atascadero 30,279 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 San Luis Obispo County El Paso De Robles 30,907 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 San Luis Obispo County Grover Beach 12,481 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 San Luis Obispo County Morro Bay 10,261 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 San Luis Obispo County Pismo Beach 7,846 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 San Luis Obispo County San Luis Obispo 48,684 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 San Luis Obispo County Unincorporated 120,070 $185,420.52 0.21804585% $188,269.67 San Mateo County San Mateo County 741,565 $2,342,700.56 2.75490621% $2,378,698.62 San Mateo County Atherton 6,976 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 San Mateo County Belmont 26,931 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 San Mateo County Brisbane 4,661 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 San Mateo County Burlingame 30,513 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 San Mateo County Colma 1,410 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 San Mateo County Daly City 101,458 $156,678.56 0.18424665% $159,086.09 San Mateo County East Palo Alto 29,078 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 San Mateo County Foster City 32,581 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 San Mateo County Half Moon Bay 11,238 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 San Mateo County Hillsborough 11,116 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 San Mateo County Menlo Park 33,140 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 San Mateo County Millbrae 23,093 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 San Mateo County Pacifica 37,062 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 San Mateo County Portola Valley 4,249 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 San Mateo County Redwood City 81,863 $126,418.59 0.14866234% $128,361.14 San Mateo County San Bruno 42,152 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 San Mateo County San Carlos 29,420 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 San Mateo County San Mateo 103,352 $159,603.41 0.18768614% $162,055.89 San Mateo County South San Francisco 64,601 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 San Mateo County Woodside 5,133 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 San Mateo County Broadmoor Police District 0 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 San Mateo County Unincorporated 61,538 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.52 State Controller's Office
2024-2025 Enhancing Law Enforcement Activities Growth Special Account Citizens' Option for Public Safety - Front-line Law Enforcement Front-line Law Enforcement City Allocation
Filter City/County
City/County
Population
Estimates
1/1/2024
Projected
Allocation by
City/County
Percent of
Allocation by
City/County
Front-line Law
Enforcement
$86,344,089.39

Page 33 of 37 ends

16.F.

Page 289 of 488 ends

Santa Barbara County Santa Barbara County 443,623 $1,118,017.70 1.31473647% $1,135,197.22 Santa Barbara County Buellton 4,970 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Santa Barbara County Carpinteria 12,744 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Santa Barbara County Goleta 32,515 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Santa Barbara County Guadalupe 8,676 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Santa Barbara County Lompoc 43,610 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Santa Barbara County Santa Barbara 85,679 $132,311.52 0.15559215% $134,344.63 Santa Barbara County Santa Maria 110,608 $170,808.63 0.20086295% $173,433.29 Santa Barbara County Solvang 5,663 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Santa Barbara County Unincorporated 139,158 $214,897.55 0.25270945% $218,199.64 Santa Clara County Santa Clara County 1,903,198 $3,348,985.44 3.93825006% $3,400,446.14 Santa Clara County Campbell 43,095 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Santa Clara County Cupertino 59,471 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Santa Clara County Gilroy 61,033 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Santa Clara County Los Altos 31,255 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Santa Clara County Los Altos Hills 8,476 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Santa Clara County Los Gatos 33,230 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Santa Clara County Milpitas 81,773 $126,279.60 0.14849890% $128,220.02 Santa Clara County Monte Sereno 3,582 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Santa Clara County Morgan Hill 46,384 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Santa Clara County Mountain View 86,535 $133,633.42 0.15714664% $135,686.84 Santa Clara County Palo Alto 67,973 $104,968.67 0.12343824% $106,581.62 Santa Clara County San Jose 969,491 $1,497,156.01 1.76058535% $1,520,161.39 Santa Clara County Santa Clara 132,048 $203,917.78 0.23979776% $207,051.19 Santa Clara County Saratoga 30,819 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Santa Clara County Sunnyvale 157,566 $243,324.47 0.28613818% $247,063.41 Santa Clara County Unincorporated 90,467 $139,705.49 0.16428711% $141,852.18 Santa Cruz County Santa Cruz County 262,572 $596,818.77 0.70183094% $605,989.53 Santa Cruz County Capitola 9,497 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Santa Cruz County Santa Cruz 62,776 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Santa Cruz County Scotts Valley 11,816 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Santa Cruz County Watsonville 51,032 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Santa Cruz County Unincorporated 127,451 $196,818.77 0.23144966% $199,843.09 Shasta County Shasta County 179,195 $444,181.54 0.52233670% $451,006.86 Shasta County Anderson 10,943 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Shasta County Redding 92,446 $142,761.60 0.16788096% $144,955.29 Shasta County Shasta Lake 10,131 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Shasta County Unincorporated 65,675 $101,419.94 0.11926510% $102,978.35 Sierra County Sierra County 3,171 $200,000.00 0.23519064% $203,073.21 Sierra County Loyalton 724 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Sierra County Unincorporated 2,447 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.60 Siskiyou County Siskiyou County 43,409 $1,100,000.00 1.29354852% $1,116,902.66 Siskiyou County Dorris 836 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 State Controller's Office
2024-2025 Enhancing Law Enforcement Activities Growth Special Account Citizens' Option for Public Safety - Front-line Law Enforcement Front-line Law Enforcement City Allocation
Filter City/County
City/County
Population
Estimates
1/1/2024
Projected
Allocation by
City/County
Percent of
Allocation by
City/County
Front-line Law
Enforcement
$86,344,089.39

Page 34 of 37 ends

16.F.

Page 290 of 488 ends

Siskiyou County Dunsmuir 1,651 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Siskiyou County Etna 665 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Siskiyou County Fort Jones 674 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Siskiyou County Montague 1,199 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Siskiyou County Mount Shasta 3,203 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Siskiyou County Tulelake 870 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Siskiyou County Weed 2,710 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Siskiyou County Yreka 7,805 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Siskiyou County Lake Shastina Cs District 0 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Siskiyou County Unincorporated 23,796 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.56 Solano County Solano County 446,426 $1,031,337.03 1.21280407% $1,047,184.61 Solano County Benicia 26,033 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Solano County Dixon 19,403 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Solano County Fairfield 120,339 $185,835.93 0.21853435% $188,691.49 Solano County Rio Vista 10,004 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Solano County Suisun City 28,840 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Solano County Vacaville 102,173 $157,782.71 0.18554508% $160,207.21 Solano County Vallejo 121,558 $187,718.39 0.22074804% $190,602.88 Solano County Unincorporated 18,076 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.59 Sonoma County Sonoma County 478,152 $1,272,032.43 1.49585060% $1,291,578.54 Sonoma County Cloverdale 8,710 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Sonoma County Cotati 7,303 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Sonoma County Healdsburg 10,985 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Sonoma County Petaluma 58,445 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Sonoma County Rohnert Park 43,821 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Sonoma County Santa Rosa 174,890 $270,077.41 0.31759839% $274,227.44 Sonoma County Sebastopol 7,295 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Sonoma County Sonoma 10,532 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Sonoma County Windsor 25,394 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Sonoma County Unincorporated 130,777 $201,955.02 0.23748965% $205,058.22 Stanislaus County Stanislaus County 548,744 $1,314,123.81 1.54534808% $1,334,316.71 Stanislaus County Ceres 49,319 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Stanislaus County Hughson 7,711 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Stanislaus County Modesto 217,862 $336,437.78 0.39563507% $341,607.50 Stanislaus County Newman 12,121 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Stanislaus County Oakdale 23,008 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Stanislaus County Patterson 24,790 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Stanislaus County Riverbank 25,006 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Stanislaus County Turlock 71,273 $110,064.77 0.12943102% $111,756.04 Stanislaus County Waterford 9,110 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Stanislaus County Unincorporated 108,544 $167,621.26 0.19711475% $170,196.90 Sutter County Sutter County 100,110 $308,494.24 0.36277479% $313,234.58 Sutter County Live Oak 9,668 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 State Controller's Office
2024-2025 Enhancing Law Enforcement Activities Growth Special Account Citizens' Option for Public Safety - Front-line Law Enforcement Front-line Law Enforcement City Allocation
Filter City/County
City/County
Population
Estimates
1/1/2024
Projected
Allocation by
City/County
Percent of
Allocation by
City/County
Front-line Law
Enforcement
$86,344,089.39

Page 35 of 37 ends

16.F.

Page 291 of 488 ends

Sutter County Yuba City 70,256 $108,494.24 0.12758415% $110,161.37 Sutter County Unincorporated 20,186 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.60 Tehama County Tehama County 64,308 $400,000.00 0.47038128% $406,146.42 Tehama County Corning 8,076 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Tehama County Red Bluff 14,300 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Tehama County Tehama 422 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Tehama County Unincorporated 41,510 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.59 Trinity County Trinity County 15,915 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Trinity County Unincorporated 15,915 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Tulare County Tulare County 478,918 $1,139,873.75 1.34043817% $1,157,389.11 Tulare County Dinuba 25,573 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Tulare County Exeter 10,179 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Tulare County Farmersville 10,327 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Tulare County Lindsay 12,594 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Tulare County Porterville 62,934 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Tulare County Tulare 70,799 $109,332.78 0.12857023% $111,012.79 Tulare County Visalia 144,532 $223,196.45 0.26246857% $226,626.10 Tulare County Woodlake 7,713 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Tulare County Unincorporated 134,267 $207,344.52 0.24382745% $210,530.56 Tuolumne County Tuolumne County 54,407 $200,000.00 0.23519064% $203,073.21 Tuolumne County Sonora 5,132 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Tuolumne County Unincorporated 49,275 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.60 Ventura County Ventura County 823,863 $1,599,341.21 1.88075038% $1,623,916.77 Ventura County Camarillo 69,014 $106,576.26 0.12532869% $108,213.92 Ventura County Fillmore 17,061 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Ventura County Moorpark 35,114 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Ventura County Ojai 7,533 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Ventura County Oxnard 197,536 $305,048.95 0.35872328% $309,736.35 Ventura County Port Hueneme 20,916 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Ventura County San Buenaventura 107,569 $166,115.60 0.19534417% $168,668.14 Ventura County Santa Paula 31,355 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Ventura County Simi Valley 124,029 $191,534.28 0.22523534% $194,477.40 Ventura County Thousand Oaks 122,643 $189,393.92 0.22271838% $192,304.16 Ventura County Unincorporated 91,093 $140,672.20 0.16542392% $142,833.75 Yolo County Yolo County 221,666 $500,460.95 0.58851865% $508,151.06 Yolo County Davis 65,054 $100,460.95 0.11813737% $102,004.64 Yolo County West Sacramento 54,278 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Yolo County Winters 7,587 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Yolo County Woodland 60,672 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Yolo County Unincorporated 34,075 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.59 Yuba County Yuba County 83,721 $303,583.46 0.35699994% $308,248.35 Yuba County Marysville 12,752 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 Yuba County Wheatland 3,893 $100,000.00 0.11759532% $101,536.61 State Controller's Office
2024-2025 Enhancing Law Enforcement Activities Growth Special Account Citizens' Option for Public Safety - Front-line Law Enforcement Front-line Law Enforcement City Allocation
Filter City/County
City/County
Population
Estimates
1/1/2024
Projected
Allocation by
City/County
Percent of
Allocation by
City/County
Front-line Law
Enforcement
$86,344,089.39

Page 36 of 37 ends

16.F.

Page 292 of 488 ends

Yuba County Unincorporated 67,076 $103,583.46 0.12180930% $105,175.13 Total Total 39,128,162 $85,037,400.00 100.00000000% $86,344,089.39 State Controller's Office
2024-2025 Enhancing Law Enforcement Activities Growth Special Account Citizens' Option for Public Safety - Front-line Law Enforcement Front-line Law Enforcement City Allocation
Filter City/County
City/County
Population
Estimates
1/1/2024
Projected
Allocation by
City/County
Percent of
Allocation by
City/County
Front-line Law
Enforcement
$86,344,089.39

Page 37 of 37 ends

16.F.

Page 293 of 488 ends

Page 294 of 488 ends

City of Hemet
City Council Meeting

STAFF REPORT

Meeting: City Council Meeting - Jan 13 2026
Department: Public Works
Submitted by: Mark Prestwich, City Manager
Noah Rau, Public Works Director/City Engineer;

☐ Receive and File ☒ Consent Calendar ☐ Business Item ☐ Public Hearing

TITLE:

A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hemet, California, Accepting an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Grant Award in the Amount of $1,200,000 for the Oakland and Santa Fe Water Fund Enterprise Water Use the of 5661), (CIP Project Replacement Main Confirming Resources as the Required Local Match, Authorizing the Administrative Services Director to Establish Appropriations of $1,200,000 in Fund 266 Miscellaneous Grants, and Authorizing Execution of all Related Documents

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

It is respectfully recommended that the City Council:

Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hemet, California, Accepting an Environmental Protection Agency Grant Award in the Amount of $1,200,000 for the Oakland and Santa Fe Water Main Replacement Project (CIP 5661), Confirming the Use of Water Enterprise Fund Resources as the Services Establish to Director Administrative Authorizing Match, Local Required the Appropriations of $1,200,000 in Fund 266 Miscellaneous Grants, and Authorizing Execution of all Related Documents.

BACKGROUND:

The City of Hemet has been actively pursuing external funding for the Oakland and Santa Fe Water Main Replacement project since 2022. The project was initially submitted for consideration under the federal Community Project Funding (earmarks) program for Fiscal Year 2023 through the office of Congressman Raul Ruiz. In February 2023, Congressman Ruiz visited the project site and formally announced the City’s selection for grant funding, marking a significant milestone in advancing this critical infrastructure investment.

Following the announcement, the City worked through the federal administrative process to transition the project to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the designated administering agency for the months. several over occurred and transition additional required This grant. coordination Throughout 2024, City staff participated in meetings with EPA representatives and were ultimately requested to prepare and submit a detailed project work plan to support grant execution.

Page 1 of 36 ends

16.G.

Page 295 of 488 ends

Progress on the work plan and subsequent grant steps was impacted by staffing turnover and broader federal administrative delays. The City formally submitted the grant application materials in January 2025 and was accepted into the EPA grant management system in February 2025.

During Spring 2025, the City completed all required pre-award activities, including environmental review, tribal consultation, and coordination with the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO).

Following additional periods of limited federal communication during mid-2025, the City resumed coordination with EPA staff and, on December 16, 2025, received formal notification of the grant award and the associated award letter.

Despite the extended timeline, City staff continued to advance project readiness throughout the process. With grant funding now formally awarded, the project is positioned to move forward into procuring a contractor to complete the construction.

ANALYSIS:

City staff from the Public Works Department submitted a grant application to the Environmental Protection Agency in January 2025 to secure funding for critical water infrastructure improvements within the City of Hemet. The application requested $1,200,000 in grant funding to support the construction phase of CIP 5661 – Oakland and Santa Fe Water Main Replacement and included a required 25 percent local match.

On December 16, 2025, the City received formal notification of award in the amount of $1,200,000.

The required local match of $300,000 will be funded through the Water Enterprise Fund (Fund 571).

Grant funds, combined with the local match, will be used exclusively for construction activities. The total project cost is estimated at approximately $4.5 million, with remaining project phases funded by the City's Water Enterprise Fund.

Acceptance of this grant will allow the City to advance a high-priority capital improvement project while leveraging external funding to reduce financial impacts on local ratepayers.

DISCUSSION:

water steel coated and lined cement-mortar aging operates currently Hemet of City The an transmission line that conveys potable water from the Park Hill Tank site to Florida Avenue and the surrounding service area. Over the past five years, this transmission main has experienced multiple failures due to deterioration of its internal and exterior mortar lining that has allowed the steel to degrade. As the pipeline has aged, ongoing metal fatigue has made spot repairs increasingly ineffective, resulting in higher maintenance costs and an elevated risk of service disruptions.

The primary objective of CIP 5661 – Oakland and Santa Fe Water Main Replacement is to replace the deteriorating transmission main with a modern, durable water conveyance system and to decommission the existing infrastructure. The project will replace the transmission line running west along Oakland Avenue to Santa Fe Street and south along North Santa Fe Street to Florida Avenue (Highway 74).

This infrastructure corridor serves both established residential neighborhoods and the Florida Avenue commercial area, one of the City’s primary arterial roadways. Beyond addressing critical system deficiencies, the project supports the City’s broader goals for downtown stability and revitalization by

Page 2 of 36 ends

16.G.

Page 296 of 488 ends

ensuring a reliable and efficient water supply for residents and businesses. Strengthening this backbone infrastructure will help reduce the likelihood of emergency repairs, improve service reliability, and support long-term economic activity and reinvestment in the area.

Design for CIP 5661 has been completed, and the required environmental review, tribal outreach, and State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) consultation processes have been finalized. Upon acceptance of the EPA grant award, the City will proceed with procurement of a construction contractor and anticipates beginning the construction phase in the coming months.

PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION:

Council has taken no previous action specific to acceptance of the EPA grant. However, Council has previously approved funding appropriations for this project through adoption of the City’s Annual Five- Year Capital Improvement Program.

STRATEGIC PLAN INTEGRATION:

GOAL THREE: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
To connect and participate in a constant dialogue between members of the community, City staff, and elected officials to promote togetherness and positivity.

Objective 1: Deliver messaging to the Community that connects, is consistent, and relevant.

Objective 2: Increase transparency for the public.

Objective 3: Increase the community's pride within the City.

GOAL FIVE: ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS
To identify the work needed inside the City organization to effectively provide services to the community and ensure financial stability.

Objective 1: Operate in a financially sustainable manner.

Objective 2: Evaluate existing practices to ensure continuity with industry best practices.

Objective 3: Provide Council with policies that are consistent while lessening liabilities.

Objective 4: Increase employee retention by training and creating a positive workplace.

Objective 5: Streamline fire prevention coordination efforts.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The total project cost is estimated at approximately $4.5 million. The EPA grant award of $1,200,000 and the required local match of $300,000 will be used to fund part of the construction phase of the project. This project previously received an appropriation from the Water Enterprise Fund (571) so the local match and additional project budget will continue to be funded from that existing appropriation.

No General Fund impact is anticipated.

ALTERNATIVE(S):

1. Do not accept the monetary award from the EPA and fully fund the project with Water Enterprise Funding.

2. Provide alternative direction to the City Manager.

ATTACHMENT(S):

Attachment 1: Resolution accepting EPA community grant CIP 5661 Attachment 2: Grant award letter with EPA terms, conditions and regulations

Page 3 of 36 ends

Hemet City CouncilJanuary 13, 2026

Hemet City Council
January 13, 2026