18.I.
ௐௐௐௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐ ௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐ
ௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐ ௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐ ௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐ ௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐ ௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐ ௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐ ௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐ ௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐ ௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐ ௐௐௐௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐ ௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐ ௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐ ௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐ ௐௐௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐ ௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐ ௐௐௐௐௐௐ
Bid Number: RFP 121223 Vendor Name: Stertil-Koni USA, Inc.
18.I.
ௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐ
ௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐௐௐ
ௐ
ௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐ
ௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐ
Bid Number: RFP 121223 Vendor Name: Stertil-Koni USA, Inc.
18.I.
Bid Number: RFP 121223 Vendor Name: Stertil-Koni USA, Inc.
18.I.
Bid Number: RFP 121223 Vendor Name: Stertil-Koni USA, Inc.
18.I.
Bid Number: RFP 121223 Vendor Name: Stertil-Koni USA, Inc.
18.I.
Stertil-Koni #121223-SKI
Pricing for contract #121223-SKI offers Sourcewell participating agencies the following discounts:
• 29% off list price for the purchase of 1 lifting system • 32% off list price for the purchase of 2-7 lifting systems • 33.5% off list price for the purchase of 8 or more lifting systems
18.I.
City of Hemet
City Council Meeting
STAFF REPORT
Meeting: City Council Meeting - Sep 08 2026
Department: Public Works
Submitted by: Noah Rau, Interim City Manager
Daniel Cortese, Environmental Services Manager;
☐ Receive and File ☒ Consent Calendar ☐ Business Item ☐ Public Hearing TITLE:
A Resolution Approving the FY 2026-27 Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake TMDL Task Force Stakeholder Contribution and Authorization for Future Annual Contributions RECOMMENDED ACTION:
It is respectfully recommended that the City Council adopt the following resolution (Attachment No. 1):
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-151 – A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HEMET, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 LAKE ELSINORE AND
CANYON LAKE TMDL TASK FORCE STAKEHOLDER CONTRIBUTION IN THE AMOUNT OF $64,090 AND AUTHORIZING FUTURE ANNUAL STAKEHOLDER CONTRIBUTIONS IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $75,000 PER FISCAL YEAR
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the City of Hemet’s FY 2026-27 Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Task Force stakeholder contribution of $64,090 to the Lake Elsinore and San Jacinto Watersheds Authority (LESJWA). Staff further recommends establishing administrative authority for future annual stakeholder contributions not to exceed $75,000 per fiscal year, subject to annual budget appropriation and a valid Task Force Agreement.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
On March 12, 2026, the Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake TMDL Task Force approved its FY 2026-27 budget for implementation activities required by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board Basin Plan Amendment for the Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake Nutrient TMDLs. LESJWA administers the Task Force. The approved FY 2026-27 Task Force budget totals $1,092,284. The City of Hemet allocation is $55,690 for Task Force activities and $8,400 for Lake Elsinore Aeration and Mixing System (LEAMS), for a total stakeholder contribution of $64,090. LESJWA issued Invoice No. TMDL-27-04, dated July 30, 2026, in that amount (Attachment No. 2).
18.J.
DISCUSSION:
The City is a participating agency in the Agreement to Form the Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake TMDL Task Force, originally effective June 18, 2012 (Attachment No. 3). The Task Force coordinates implementation of the nutrient TMDLs, including monitoring, technical studies, implementation planning, and coordination with the Regional Water Quality Control Board. Participation provides cost savings through consolidated efforts and deliverables, shared technical expertise, and a coordinated regional approach.
The City’s prior authorization related to the Task Force does not provide sufficient administrative authority for the current $64,090 expenditure. The 2012 authorization permitted the City Engineer to appoint representatives to the Task Force but did not establish recurring spending authority.
Amendment No. 3 addresses the term of the Task Force Agreement and provides for extension through June 30, 2027, but does not establish the annual contribution or delegate spending authority (Attachment No. 4). Because the FY 2026-27 contribution exceeds $50,000 and no existing authorization pre-authorizes the expenditure, Council approval is requested before issuance of a purchase order. To streamline future routine payments, the proposed resolution also authorizes future annual stakeholder contributions up to $75,000 per fiscal year, provided sufficient funds are appropriated in the applicable annual budget and the City’s participation remains authorized under a valid Task Force Agreement. Contributions above $75,000 or outside that authority would return to the City Council for approval.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION:
On June 18, 2012, the City became a participating agency in the Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake TMDL Task Force. The prior City authorization allowed the City Engineer to appoint representatives to the Task Force but did not authorize recurring stakeholder payments or delegate ongoing spending authority. The Task Force Agreement has since been extended by amendments, including Amendment No. 3, which provides for an extension through June 30, 2027.
STRATEGIC PLAN INTEGRATION:
GOAL FIVE: ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS
To identify the work needed inside the City organization to effectively provide services to the community and ensure financial stability.
Objective 1: Operate in a financially sustainable manner.
Objective 2: Evaluate existing practices to ensure continuity with industry best practices.
Objective 3: Provide Council with policies that are consistent while lessening liabilities.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Appropriations for this have already been established and approved in Fiscal Year 2026-27 Operating Budget, account 254.10.4650.52450.
Future stakeholder contributions authorized by the proposed resolution may not exceed $75,000 per fiscal year and are contingent upon sufficient funds being appropriated by the City Council in the applicable annual budget.
18.J.
ALTERNATIVE(S):
1. Do not adopt the resolution approving the FY 2026-27 stakeholder contribution and provide alternative direction to the City Manager.
2. Approve the FY 2026-27 contribution but do not authorize future annual stakeholder contributions administratively.
ATTACHMENT(S):
Attachment No. 1 - Resolution No. 2026-151
Attachment No. 2 - LESJWA FY 2026-27 Stakeholder Contribution Letter, Invoice No. TMDL-27- 04,and Approved FY 2026-27 Budget
Attachment No. 3 -Agreement to Form the Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake TMDL Task Force (June 18, 2012)
Attachment No. 4 - Amendment No. 3 to the Task Force Agreement
18.J.
CITY OF HEMET RESOLUTION NO. 2026-151 1
11111
22222
33333
44444
55555
66666
77777
88888
99999
1010101010
1111111111
1212121212
1313131313
1414141414
1515151515
1616161616
1717171717
1818181818
1919191919
2020202020
2121212121
2222222222
2323232323
2424242424
2525252525
2626262626
2727272727
2828282828
CITY OF HEMET
HEMET, CALIFORNIA
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-151
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF HEMET, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE FISCAL
YEAR 2026-27 LAKE ELSINORE AND CANYON LAKE
TMDL TASK FORCE STAKEHOLDER CONTRIBUTION IN
THE AMOUNT OF $64,090 AND AUTHORIZING FUTURE
ANNUAL STAKEHOLDER CONTRIBUTIONS IN AN
AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $75,000 PER FISCAL YEAR
The City Council of the City of Hemet, California (hereafter referred to as the “City Council”) does resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board established nutrient Total Maximum Daily Loads (“TMDLs”) for Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake through the Water Quality Control Plan for the Santa Ana River Basin; and WHEREAS, on June 18, 2012, the City of Hemet and other participating agencies entered into the Agreement to Form the Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake TMDL Task Force (“Task Force Agreement”) to cooperatively implement TMDL-related activities; and
WHEREAS, the City of Hemet is a participating Task Force Agency and the Lake Elsinore and San Jacinto Watersheds Authority (“LESJWA”) administers the Task Force; and
WHEREAS, Amendment No. 3 to the Task Force Agreement extended the agreement through June 30, 2025 and provided an option for an additional administrative extension through June 30, 2027; and
18.J.
CITY OF HEMET RESOLUTION NO. 2026-151 2
11111
22222
33333
44444
55555
66666
77777
88888
99999
1010101010
1111111111
1212121212
1313131313
1414141414
1515151515
1616161616
1717171717
1818181818
1919191919
2020202020
2121212121
2222222222
2323232323
2424242424
2525252525
2626262626
2727272727
2828282828
WHEREAS, on March 12, 2026, the Task Force approved its Fiscal Year 2026- 27 budget for implementation of activities associated with the Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake Nutrient TMDLs; and
WHEREAS, LESJWA issued Invoice No. TMDL-27-04, dated July 30, 2026, establishing the City of Hemet’s Fiscal Year 2026-27 stakeholder contribution at $64,090, consisting of $55,690 for Task Force activities and $8,400 for the Lake Elsinore Aeration and Mixing System (“LEAMS”); and
WHEREAS, prior City authorization concerning participation in the Task Force did not establish continuing expenditure authority for annual stakeholder contributions; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to approve the Fiscal Year 2026-27 contribution and establish limited administrative authority for future annual stakeholder contributions to facilitate timely payment while maintaining appropriate fiscal controls.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HEMET FINDS, DETERMINES, ORDERS AND RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The recitals set forth above are hereby adopted as findings in support of this Resolution.
SECTION 2. The City Council hereby approves the City of Hemet's Fiscal Year 2026-27 Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake TMDL Task Force stakeholder contribution in the amount of $64,090, payable to LESJWA pursuant to Invoice No. TMDL-27-04.
SECTION 3. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager, or designee, to execute all necessary documents and take administrative actions required to issue a
18.J.
CITY OF HEMET RESOLUTION NO. 2026-151 3
11111
22222
33333
44444
55555
66666
77777
88888
99999
1010101010
1111111111
1212121212
1313131313
1414141414
1515151515
1616161616
1717171717
1818181818
1919191919
2020202020
2121212121
2222222222
2323232323
2424242424
2525252525
2626262626
2727272727
2828282828
purchase order and process payment of the Fiscal Year 2026-27 stakeholder contribution in accordance with City purchasing policies and procedures.
SECTION 4. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager, or designee, to approve purchase orders and payments for future annual Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake TMDL Task Force stakeholder contributions in an amount not to exceed $75,000 per fiscal year, without further City Council action, provided that sufficient funds have been appropriated by the City Council in the applicable annual budget, the City's participation remains authorized under a valid Task Force Agreement, and there has been no material modification requiring separate City Council approval. Any annual contribution exceeding $75,000 shall require separate City Council approval.
SECTION 5. Nothing in this Resolution constitutes an appropriation of funds for future fiscal years. Future payments are contingent upon City Council appropriation of sufficient funds through the applicable annual budget.
SECTION 6. The administrative expenditure authority established by this Resolution shall remain effective only while the City’s participation in the Task Force Agreement remains legally effective, unless otherwise authorized by subsequent City Council action.
SECTION 7. This Resolution shall become effective upon adoption.
18.J.
CITY OF HEMET RESOLUTION NO. 2026-151 4
11111
22222
33333
44444
55555
66666
77777
88888
99999
1010101010
1111111111
1212121212
1313131313
1414141414
1515151515
1616161616
1717171717
1818181818
1919191919
2020202020
2121212121
2222222222
2323232323
2424242424
2525252525
2626262626
2727272727
2828282828
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of September, 2026. ___________________________
Linda Krupa, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
________________________ __________________________
Steven Graham Pacifico, City Attorney Rosalia A. Butler, MMC, City Clerk
18.J.
CITY OF HEMET RESOLUTION NO. 2026-151 5
11111
22222
33333
44444
55555
66666
77777
88888
99999
1010101010
1111111111
1212121212
1313131313
1414141414
1515151515
1616161616
1717171717
1818181818
1919191919
2020202020
2121212121
2222222222
2323232323
2424242424
2525252525
2626262626
2727272727
2828282828
State of California )
County of Riverside )
City of Hemet )
I, Rosalia A. Butler, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Hemet, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted by the Hemet City Council on the 8th day of September, 2026, and was passed by the following vote:
AYES: Council Members:
NOES: Council Members:
ABSTAIN: Council Members:
ABSENT: Council Members:
_____________________________
Rosalia A. Butler, MMC, City Clerk
18.J.
11615 Sterling Avenue, Riverside, CA 92503 | (951) 354-4220 | www.mywatersheds.com August 6, 2026
Mr. Dan Cortese
City of Hemet
445 East Florida Avenue
Hemet, CA 92543
Subject: Lake Elsinore & Canyon Lake TMDL Task Force Stakeholder Contributions Invoice FY 2025-26
Dear Mr. Cortese:
On March 12, 2026, the Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake TMDL Task Force approved the budget for FY 2026-27. The budget defines the projected costs for the implementation tasks required by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) Basin Plan Amendment for Nutrient TMDL for Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake. This work will be conducted under the Task Force, which is composed of the agencies listed below, and will be administered by the Lake Elsinore & San Jacinto Watersheds Authority (LESJWA).
CA Department of Fish & Game City of Murrieta
CA Department of Transportation City of Perris
County of Riverside City of Riverside
U.S. Air Force (March Air Reserve Base) City of San Jacinto City of Beaumont City of Wildomar
City of Canyon Lake Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District City of Hemet Eastern Municipal Water District
City of Lake Elsinore Dairy Operators in San Jacinto River Basin City of Menifee Ag Operators in San Jacinto River Basin City of Moreno Valley
As a named party of the RWQCB Basin Plan for Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake Nutrient TMDLs (shown above), participation in this joint effort provides the following benefits to your agency:
• significant cost savings through the consolidation of efforts and deliverables, • a forum for the most cost effective and efficient strategy to address the TMDL mandate,
• increased knowledge through the sharing of expertise and technology, and • a single unified voice to address the Regional Board.
18.J.
11615 Sterling Avenue, Riverside, CA 92503 | (951) 354-4220 | www.mywatersheds.com On behalf of the Task Force, thank you for your support. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this invoice, please feel free to discuss them with me at any time.
Sincerely,
Richard Whetsel
Principal Watershed Manager
Enc: FY 2026-27 Invoice
FY 2026-27 Budget
18.J.
11615 Sterling Avenue Riverside, CA 92503 Phone 951/354-4220 Fax 951/352-3422 11615 Sterling Avenue Riverside, CA 92503 Phone 909-785-5411 Fax 909-352-3422
I N V O I C E
Invoice Date July 30, 2026 Invoice # TMDL-27-04
Mr. Daniel Cortese
City of Hemet
445 E. Florida Avenue
Hemet, CA 92543
FY 2026-27 Lake Elsinore & Canyon Lake TMDL Task Force Stakeholder Contributions Task Force Contributions $64,090.00
TOTAL DUE: $64,090.00
Please make the check payable to Lake Elsinore & San Jacinto Watersheds Authority (LESJWA), Attn: Accounts Receivable, 11615 Sterling Avenue, Riverside, CA 92503
18.J.
12-Mar-26
Task Force LEAMS Invoice Amount
Riverside County $ 182,607 $ - $ 182,607
City of Beaumont $ 34,654 $ 3,000 $ 37,654
City of Canyon Lake $ 44,967 $ 3,900 $ 48,867
City of Hemet $ 55,690 $ 8,400 $ 64,090
City of Lake Elsinore $ 43,899 $ - $ 43,899
City of Moreno Valley $ 84,933 $ 31,500 $ 116,433
City of Murrieta $ 42,571 $ 3,000 $ 45,571
City of Perris $ 83,420 $ 15,900 $ 99,320
City of Riverside $ 34,654 $ 3,000 $ 37,654
City of San Jacinto $ 34,654 $ 3,000 $ 37,654
City of Menifee $ 89,651 $ 31,200 $ 120,851
City of Wildomar $ 29,767 $ 7,200 $ 36,967
Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD) $ 36,132 $ - $ 36,132 San Jacinto Agricultural Operators (WRCAC) $ 15,987 $ - $ 15,987 San Jacinto Dairy & CAFO Operators $ 3,800 $ - $ 3,800
CA Department of Transportation $ 43,146 $ 5,100 $ 48,246 CA DF&W - San Jacinto Wetlands $ 34,654 $ - $ 34,654
Eastern Municipal Water District $ 34,654 $ - $ 34,654
US Air Force (March Air Reserve Base) $ 43,944 $ 3,300 $ 47,244 Total: $ 973,784 $ 118,500 $ 1,092,284
Approved FY 2026-27 Budget: Lake Elsinore & Canyon Lake TMDL Task Force
18.J.
FINAL 6/18/12
AGREEMENT TO FORM
THE LAKE ELSINORE AND CANYON LAKE TMDL TASK FORCE
This Agreement to form the Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake TMDL Task Force (hereinafter “AGREEMENT”) is made and effective this 18th day of June, 2012 by and among the following entities.which are hereinafter sometimes collectively referred to as “TASK FORCE AGENCIES” or individually as “TASK FORCE AGENCY":
I California Department of Fish and Game I City of Wildomar I California Department of Transportation County of Riverside I City of Beaumont Eastern Municipal Water District
I City of Canyon Lake I Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District I City of Hemet I March Joint Powers Authority
I City of Lake Elsinore I Riverside County Flood Control and Water I City of Menifee Conservation District
I City of Moreno Valley I US Air Force (March Air Reserve Base) I City of Murrieta I Western Riverside County Agriculture Coalition I City of Penis (on behalf of the participating Dairy Operators I City of Riverside and participating Agricultural Operators in the . City of San Jacinto San Jacinto River Basin)
1. RECITALS
A. Whereas, in 1998,the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (hereinafter “Regional Board”) designated Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake in the Lake Elsinore and San Jacinto Watersheds (Collectively the “Watersheds”) as “impaired water bodies" pursuant to Section 303(d) of the federal Clean Water Act because of high levels of algae in both lakes and low dissolved oxygen in Lake Elsinore, attributed to excess phosphorus and nitrogen (Nutrients). As a result of said Section 303 designation, the Clean Water Act and California’s Non—point Source Pollution Control Plan requires that total maximum daily loads (hereinafter “‘TMDLS”) be established by the Regional Board for these waterbodies;
B. Whereas, in response to the Section 303(d) designation, the Regional Board adopted a Resolution R8- 2004-0037 on December 20, 2004 amending the Water Quality Control Plan for the Santa Ana River Basin (BASIN PLAN AMENDMENT) to incorporate nutrient TMDLs for Canyon Lake and Lake Elsinore. The Basin Plan Amendment speci?es, among other things, an Implementation Plan, which holds speci?ed stake holders (TASK FORCE AGENCIES) individually and/or jointly liable for complying with the TMDLs by means of speci?c tasks to be completed by speci?ed dates under penalty of law. These tasks include development and implementation of a watershed—widenutrient water quality monitoring program, development of an in-lake nutrient monitoring program for Canyon Lake and Lake Elsinore, development of a plan and schedule for in-lake sediment nutrient reduction for Lake Elsinore, development of a plan and schedule for evaluating in-lake sediment nutrient strategies for Canyon Lake, updating watershed and in-lake nutrient TMDL water quality models, developing a pollutant trading plan, and reviewing and revising the TMDL to re?ect updated data and science; C. Whereas, the purpose of this AGREEMENT is to form a task force (hereinafter “TASK FORCE”) to implement certain tasks identi?ed in the TMDL Implementation Plan and to pursue TMDL related tasks agreed upon by TASK FORCE AGENCIES;
18.J.
Luke Elsinore/Canyon Lake TMDL Task Force Agreement
D. Whereas, the TASK FORCE AGENCIES agree that the purpose of this TASK FORCE is to (I) review and develop recommendationsto update the TMDL BASIN PLAN AMENDMENT based on the best available scienti?c information, and (2) implement TMDL Implementation Plan Tasks identi?ed below and jointly assigned to TASK FORCE AGENCIES, and (3) propose appropriate revisions to the TMDL BASIN PLAN AMENDMENT to the Santa Ana RWQCB, and (4) allow watershed stakeholdersto participate in efforts to meet appropriate water quality standards so that Canyon Lake and/or Lake Elsinore can be de»listed from the Clean Water Act 303(d) list of impaired water bodies;
Er Whereas, hundreds of individual agricultural and dairy operators are subject to the Canyon Lake and Lake Elsinore TMDLs and its component TMDL Implementation Plan; F. Whereas, the Western Riverside County Agricultural Coalition(WRCAC) is a non—profitorganization representing the interests of participating agricultural and dairy operators within the San Jacinto Watershed; G. Whereas, WRCAC’s membership is open to any and all agricultural and dairy operators Withinthe San Jacinto watershed;
H. Whereas, March Air Reserve Base (MARB) is an installation of the United States Air Force on federal lands and, as an agency of the federal government, is therefore subject to limitationsin its ability to comply with every provision stated herein to the same extent that other non—federalTASK FORCE AGENCIES are able to comply. These limitations are based upon, but not limited to, those identi?ed in the federal Clean Water Act, the federal Antidefrciency Act, the principle of sovereign immunity and the holdings of the Supreme Court of the United States, and other binding federal court decisions, as they interpret those sources of federal law. The limitations so mentioned include, but are not limited to, the availability of federal funding to pay for participation in this program, and the ability of MARB to participate directly in sampling, research or data gathering activities which are not located on or near MARB lands or a point source of water discharge arising on MAKE lands, or other activities not speci?cally authorized by the Federal Clean Water Act section 313. To the extent that the limitations described herein prevent MARB from fully participating in any aspect of this program, they reserve the right, in their sole discretion, to participate in the program as a matter of comity. By entering into this agreement, MARB does not authorize any of the TASK FORCE AGENCIES to exercise regulatory authority over them. MARB agrees that State and federal regulatory agencies that are or may become members of this TASK FORCE have regulatory authority over MARB only to the extent permitted by State or Federal Law; [. Whereas, the TASK FORCE AGENCIES acknowledge and agree that the effectiveness of the TASK FORCE may be improved by the inclusion of other agencies as additional TASK FORCE AGENCIES to the TASK FORCE;
J. Whereas, the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFC&WCD) serves as the MS4 PRINCIPAL PERMITTEE for the National Pollutant DischargeElimination System (NPDES) Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System Permit (MS4) for the Santa Ana Region of Riverside County; K. Whereas, the County of Riverside and Cities of Beaumont,Canyon Lake, Hemet, Lake Elsinore, Moreno Valley, Murrieta, Perris, Riverside, San Jacinto, Menifee, Wildomar are MS4 CO-PERMITTEES for the NPDES MS4 Permit for the Santa Ana Region of Riverside County; L. Whereas, the MS4 PRINCIPAL PERMITTEE and MS4 CO-PERMITTEES collectively represent the MS4 PERMITTEES within the San Jacinto Watershed;
M. Whereas, the NPDES MS4 Permit for the Santa Ana Region of Riverside County is regulated by the Regional Board and subject to the requirements of the nutrient TMDLs for Canyon Lake and Lake Elsinore; N. Whereas RCFC&WCD has agreed to provide services on behalf of itself as MS4 PRINCIPAL PERMITTEE and on behalf of the MS4 CO—PERMITTEESfor the purposes of this AGREEMENT;
18.J.
Lake Elsinore/Canyon Lake TMDL Task Force Agreement
0. Whereas, the TMDL assigned nutrient waste load allocationsfor Supplemental Water addition to Lake Elsinore to stabilize the Lake's elevation;
P. Whereas, the nutrient Waste load allocation for Supplemental Water, which includes Island Well water, EVMWD treatment plant ef?uent, and other sources of non-stormwater, may reduce the TMDL waste load allocation and TMDL load allocation of other point and non-point sources because in—lakenutrient capacity was not adjusted to account for increased lake levels associated with the addition of Supplemental Water; Q. Whereas, the assumptions regarding load allocations for Supplemental Water may not be consistent with the actual operation of Supplemental Water sources; R. Whereas, the City of Lake Elsinore and EVMWD previously entered into an agreement to equally share the cost of Supplemental Water addition to the Lake under the "Lake Elsinore Comprehensive Water Management Agreement",
S. Whereas, for the purposes of this Agreement, the City of Lake Elsinore shall be acknowledgedand recognized as a separate and equal contributor with EVMWD for the cost and voting rights accorded under this Agreement attributed to EVMWD for Supplemental Water addition; T. Whereas, the TASK FORCE AGENCIES agree that certain nutrient dischargers have been either inappropriately named or not named as responsible parties for various tasks in the BASIN PLAN AMENDMENT; U. Whereas, the TASK FORCE AGENCIES agree that agricultural and dairy lands are converting to urban and open space lands;
V. Whereas, the TASK FORCE AGENCIES agree that an amendment to the TMDL to address, at minimum, the proper naming of responsible parties for various tasks in the TMDL Implementation Plan, to correct the load allocation and waste load allocationsto properly address the impacts of Supplemental Water on Lake Elsinore, and to revise the load allocation and waste load allocationsto address the ongoing conversion of agriculture and dairy lands to urban and/or open space should be addressed as part of a revision to the TMDL Implementation Plan; and
W. Whereas, MARB agrees to budget for and to participate in the TASK FORCE, provided that suf?cient funds are appropriated by the Congress, and on the condition that funding requirements under this AGREEMENT do not Violate the Anti-de?ciency Act, and provided that the TASK FORCE AGENCIES agree to relocate the proposed monitoring station from Kitching Channel to the Heacock drainage channel, and use any fees provided by MARB, for participation in this program, to establish and monitor this station. [1. COVENANTS
NOW, THEREFORE, in considerationof the foregoing recitals and mutual covenants contained herein, the TASK FORCE AGENCIES agree as follows:
1. Creation of a Task Force. There is hereby created a “Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake TMDL Task Force” (“TASK FORCE”) consisting of the TASK FORCE AGENCIES and certain Non-Voting, Non—FundingMembers as more speci?cally provided for in paragraph 2 below.
2. Representation on the Task Force.
a. Appointment. Concurrently with the execution of this Agreement, each TASK FORCE AGENCY shall, in accordance with such TASK FORCE AGENCY’S own governing provisions, appoint one primary representative to the TASK FORCE and one alternate representative to act in the absence of the primary representative (hereinafter collectively referred to as “REPRESENTATIVES” or individually as “REPRESENTATIVE"). The REPRESENTATIVES
18.J.
Lake Elsinore/Canyon Lake TMDL Task Force Agreement
shall have the authority to act on behalf of its appointing TASK FORCE AGENCY. The REPRESENTATIVES shall serve at the pleasure of the appointing TASK FORCE AGENCY and may be removed at any time.with or without cause by such TASK FORCE AGENCY; provided, however, that the TASK FORCE AGENCIES acknowledge and agree the continuity of representation on the TASK FORCE is important to the overall effectiveness of the TASK FORCE, and the TASK FORCE AGENCIES further agree to ensure such continuity whenever possible.
b. Additional Agencies. The TASK FORCE AGENCIES acknowledge and agree that the effectiveness of the TASK FORCE may be improved by the inclusion of other agencies as additional TASK FORCE AGENCIES to the TASK FORCE. Such agencies may join the TASK FORCE on such written terms and conditions as are acceptable to all then existing TASK FORCE AGENCIES of the TASK FORCE, including, but not limited to, agreed—uponcash contributions for past, present, and/or future work, of the TASK FORCE. The inclusion of such agencies as additional TASK FORCE AGENCIES to the TASK FORCE shall be effected by a written amendment to this AGREEMENT signed by all then existing TASK FORCE AGENCIES. Such additional TASK FORCE AGENCIES shall each appoint their TASK FORCE primary REPRESENTATIVE and alternate REPRESENTATIVE as provided in Section 112.21above or in said written amendment. The following agencies will be considered for inclusion as additional TASK FORCE AGENCIES in future amendments to this Agreement within the meaning of this section:
Any other named stakeholder in any future amendments of the BASIN PLAN AMENDMENT. c. Non—Voting,Non-Funding Members. The Regional Board, Lake Elsinore and San Jacinto Watersheds Authority and the San Jacinto River Watershed council are hereby appointed as Non— Voting, Non-Funding Members of the TASK FORCE. Additional Non-Voting, Non-Funding Members may be appointed by a majority vote of the TASK FORCE representatives. NonVoting , Non-Funding Members appointed herein, and any appointed in the future are authorized only to make recommendations upon the functioning of this TASK FORCE and the development of this program. Federal, State and local regulatory agencies acting as Non-Voting, Non—Funding Members, now or in the future, retain authority to regulate TASK FORCE MEMBERS only to the extent that they are so authorized under State and Federal law. d. Dai? and Agricultural Operators The TASK FORCE AGENCIES acknowledge that the Western Riverside County Agriculture Coalition (WRCAC) shall represent the collective interest of both participating agricultural and dairy operators in the San Jacinto River Watershed in the TASK FORCE at this time. WRCAC shall appoint two primary TASK FORCE REPRESENTATIVES and two alternate REPRESENTATIVES as provided in Section ll.2.a. One set of REPRESENTATIVES shall be designated for agricultural operator interests; the other set of REPRESENTATIVES shall be designated for dairy interestsfor the purposes of this TASK FORCE.
e. Committees. The TASK FORCE may establish subcommittees,consisting of REPRESENTATIVES and Non—Voting,Non-Funding Members who shall be selectedby, and serve at the pleasure of, the TASK FORCE.
f. Task Force Administrator, A TASK FORCE administrator (hereinafter “TASK FORCE ADMINISTRATOR”) shall be appointed by the TASK FORCE. The TASK FORCE ADMINISTRATOR shall have the following administrative responsibilities:
18.J.
Lake Elsinore/Canyon Lake TMDL Task Force Agreement
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
Organizing and facilitating TASK FORCE meetings;
Secretarial, clerical, and administrative services;
Managing TASK FORCE funds and preparing annual reports of TASK FORCE assets and expenditures;
Retaining TASK FORCE-authorized consultants; and
Seeking funding grants to assist with achieving the work of the TASK FORCE and other goals and objectives approved by TASK FORCE AGENCIES.
Possible administrator of future pollutant trading (water quality trading) agreements The TASK FORCE AGENCIES hereby appoint the Lake Elsinore and San Jacinto Watersheds Authority as the initial TASK FORCE ADMINISTRATOR.
Meetings of the Task Force.
(1)
(ii)
Frequency and Location. The TASK FORCE shall, by resolution or motion, agree upon the time and place for holding its regular meetings. Special meetings may be called at the request of the TASK FORCE ADMINISTRATOR or by a majority of the TASK FORCE REPRESENTATIVES.
Task Force Chair. The TASK FORCE REPRESENTATIVES shall select a chair and a vicechair. The term of the chair and vice-chairshall be one year and shall be rotated among the TASK FORCE REPRESENTATIVES interested in serving as chair. (iii) Quorum. One half or more of the REPRESENTATIVES of the TASK FORCE shall (iV)
constitute a Quorum.
Voting. Actions of the TASK FORCE shall be validly taken only when a Quorumis present and upon the af?rmative vote of a MAJORITY of the TASK FORCE REPRESENTATIVES. A MAJORITY of the REPRESENTATIVES shall be determined as follows:
Each TASK FORCE AGENCY shall have one vote assigned for each $1,000 increment of PRO RATA COST SHARE, as described in Paragraph 11.5below, contributed to the TASK FORCE Budget developed for a given ?scal year. A MAJORITY of the REPRESENTATIVES shall consist of greater than 50% of the total votes based on the Budget for the ?scal year during which the action is taken.
All meetings of the TASK FORCE or any of its committees shall be conducted as may be required by any applicable provisions of the Ralph M. Brown Act (California Government Code §§54950 et seq.). The provisions contained in the Ralph M. Brown Act shall prevail in the event of any con?ict with provisions contained in this Agreement.
The TASK FORCE may adopt such additional rules and regulations as may be required for the conduct of its affairs so long as such rules and regulations do not con?ict with this Agreement.
3. Work of the Task Force. The TASK FORCE shall perform the following tasks in accordance with guidelines established by the Regional Board:
a. To retain consulting services to review scienti?c and other assumptions contained within the TMDL. Consultant(s) shall provide a report identifying preliminary TMDL opportunities such as site speci?c objectives. pollutant trading strategies, and integration strategies. The final scope of work shall be approved by the Task Force. The report shall specifically consider assumptions supporting the TMDL. The report should also provide preliminary analysis of the ability to achieve in—lakenutrient reductions and verify that load assignments are appropriate. Upon completion of the report, Consultant(s) shall also review work described herein, and make
18.J.
Lake Elsinore/Canyon Lake TMDL Task Forte Agreement
recommendationsto ensure that work is speci?cally designed to resolve any de?ciencies, where appropriate. Consultant(s) shall also coordinate development of BASIN PLAN AMENDMENT language, in coordination with the Regional Board, which can be used to revise the TMDLs as part of the Regional Board’s Triennial Reviews.
TMDL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Task 4 — Implement a Watershed~wide Nutrient Monitoring Proggam. This program shall obtain data necessary to update the Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake Nutrient TMDL, and to determine compliance with interim and ?nal nitrogen and phosphorus allocations, and compliance with the nitrogen and phosphorus TMDLs. Monitoring and management of monitoring data to update the Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake Nutrient TMDL shall commence immediately upon approval of this Agreement. An annual report summarizing the data collected for the year shall be submittedto the Regional Board by August 15 of each year.
TMDL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Task 4 — Implement a Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake Nutrient Monitoring Proggarn. This program shall obtain data necessary to update the Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake Nutrient TMDLs, and to determine compliance with interim and ?nal nitrogen, phosphorus. chlorophyll A and dissolved oxygen numeric targets. In addition, the monitoring program shall determine the relationship between ammonia toxicity and the total nitrogen allocation to ensure that the total nitrogen allocation will prevent ammonia toxicity in Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake. Lake monitoring and management of lake monitoring data shall be deferred based on agreement with the Regional Board. Thereafter, an annual report summarizing the data collected for the year shall be submitted to the Regional Board by August 15 of each year.
TMDL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Tasks 9 and 10 — Implement a Plan to Reduce Nutrients from sediments in Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake. The projects will be based on prepared plans shall evaluate the ef?cacy of various in-Iake treatment technologies to prevent the release of Nutrients from lake sediments as a long—termstrategy for control of Nutrients in the sediment.
The program may also include a sediment nutrient monitoring program to evaluate the effectiveness of any technologies that may be implemented. Target Date for Completion Date:
July 1, 2015 (Interim TMDL targets) July I, 2020 (Final TMDL targets).
TMDL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Task 11 - Implement a Plan and Schedule for Updating the Existing Lake Elsinore/San Jacinto River Watershed Nutrient Model and the CanvonLake and Lake Elsinore In-Lake Models. Develop and implement a plan and schedule to update and execute Watersheds and in—lakemodels to track the progress of TMDL efforts. In-lake models should be analyzed as soon as suf?cient data becomes available. Target Date for Completion:
December 31, 2018.
TMDL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Task 12 - Investigate, Develop and Implement a Pollutant {Water Quality) Trading Plan. Investigate the feasibility of pollutant trading in the Watersheds, and develop a feasibility plan for Regional Board review and approval. Target Date for Completion: December 31. 2012.
g. Investigate Long Term TMDL Implementation Structure Cost Sharing Formula and Funding h.
Sources. Investigate possible long term administrative structures, cost sharing formulas and funding sources that can be used to obtain compliance with the TMDL requirements. Target Date for Completion: December 31, 2012.
Other Tasks. The TASK FORCE may undertake such other plans, programs and studies as authorized by the TASK FORCE pursuant to 11.2.g. of this Agreement.
18.J.
Lake Elsinore/Canyon Lake TMDL Task Force Agreemcnl
i. Limitations on MARB, As described above in Section 1.11.,MARB is an agency of the federal government and is therefore unable to participate in each and every aspect of Section 3 to the same extent as other TASK FORCE MEMBERS. To the extent that it is unable to participate in any tasks under section 3, it reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to participate to the fullest extent that it is able, as a matter of cornity.
4. Budgets. The total Annual Budget, adjusted to remove in—kindservices, grant funding and funding credits associated with this Agreement shall not exceed $800,000, except as authorized by the TASK FORCE via two-thirds approval via votes based on the Budget for the then current ?scal year pursuant to 112g. of this Agreement, The TASK FORCE ADMINSTRATOR shall prepare and submit a proposed Budget for each ?scal year of this Agreement to the TASK FORCE AGENCIES by November 30th, The proposed Budget shall include all anticipated costs for the scope(s) of work developed by the TASK FORCE for the next ?scal year. The TASK FORCE Representatives shall approve the Budget by December 315'.Each TASK FORCE AGENCY shall pay its PRO—RATA SHARE of the approved ?scal year’s TASK FORCE Budget and arrears by August 315‘of the following year. The Budget for the ?scal year 2012- 2013 and estimate for ?scal year 2013—2014 is included as Attachment A to the Agreement. Approval of this Agreement shall constitute approval of the Budget for ?scal year 2012- 2013. Payment of the ?scal year 2012- 2013 Budget shall be by August 31, 2012, or within 30 days of the approval of this Agreement by each TASK FORCE AGENCY, whichever is sooner.
The TASK FORCE ADMINISTRATOR shall endeavor to minimize carry—over fund balancesto those necessary to complete work of the TASK FORCE and to maintain contingencies limited to those necessary to ensure work of the TASK FORCE is not impeded. Excess not necessary to complete budgeted work of the TASK FORCE or maintain adequate reserves shall be credited back to the TASK FORCE AGENCIES in the Budget consistent with the PRO-KATA SHARE methodology described in Paragraph 11.5below. THE TASK FORCE AGENCIES shall agree to a reasonable reserve balance as part of each year’s Budget After September 30th of each year, the TASK FORCE ADMINSTRATOR shall provide an accounting of all PRO RATA SHARES collected via cash or in-kind contributions. If PRO RATA SHARES collected are less than Budget, the TASK FORCE shall meet with Regional Board staff to determine appropriate priorities for scheduled TASK FORCE work and revise Budget based on available funds.
5. Pro-Rata Share Calculation. The annual PRO-RATA SHARE shall be calculated in the following manner:
A. TMDL TASK FORCE costs are identi?ed within the Task Force Budget under Part A: Task Force Regulatory/Administrative Budget (see Exhibit “A”) and starting in FY 13-14 shall be shared equally by the TASK FORCE AGENCIES .
B. TMDL TASK FORCE costs identi?ed within the Task Force Budget under Part B: TMDL Implementation Project Budget (see Exhibit “A") shall be shared by the TASK FORCE AGENCIES, based upon participation in the individual program or project. The PRO-RATA SHARE for each TASK FORCE AGENCIES under Part B shall be per an amount agreed upon and/or in kind services among the participating parties.
C1 The PRO~RATA SHARE for additional TASK FORCE AGENCIES shall be per in-kind services and/or an amount agreed upon via written amendment of this AGREEMENT per Section 11.2.bi
18.J.
Lake Elsinore/Canyon Lake TMDL Task Force Agreement
10. If the estimated funds collected under the PRO-KATA SHARE calculations exceed the BUDGET, the contributions of MS4 CO—PERMITTEES,EVMWD, City of Lake Elsinore,Agricultural Operators, Dairy and other TASK FORCE AGENCIES contributing in excess of the base amount shall be raised or reduced proportionately based on the percentage of their PRO-RATA SHARE, until the estimated total PRO-RATA SHARES equals the BUDGET.
RCFC&WCD shall provide the TASK FORCE ADMINSTRATOR with annual individual MS4 C0- PERMITTEE cost share distribution of the MS4 CO-PERMITTEES PRO-RATA SHARE for each Fiscal Year. The methodology used by RCFC&WCD to calculate the MS4 CO-PERMITEE cost share distribution may be amended at the NPDES MS4 Management Steering Committee.
Pro rata cost shares assigned to TASK FORCE AGENCIES who are not PARTIES to this Agreement shall be considered unfunded portions of the BUDGET and are addressed in Section 114, paragraph 3 of this Agreement,
Iii-Kind Credits. The TASK FORCE shall accept in-kind contributions or credits for TASK FORCE work de?ned under this AGREEMENT per Section 11.3as agreed to annually by the TASK FORCE. The PRO-RATA SHARE of a TASK FORCE AGENCY shall be reduced by the value of IN—KINDCREDITS provided toward agreed-upon budgeted tasks by, or on behalf, of the TASK FORCE AGENCY(S). Credits shall be applied to each budget period and adjusted at the end of each budget year based on actual veri?ed costs unless deferred to a future budget year among the TASK FORCE AGENCIES with credits.
Modi?cations to the TASK FORCE PRO—RATASHARE methodologv. The methodology deriving the TASK FORCE PRO-RATA SHARE as provided in Section 11.5of this Agreement may be modi?ed upon written approval of all then existing TASK FORCE AGENCIES who’s PRO—RATA SHARE would be affected.
The TASK FORCE AGENCIES shall cooperate fully with one another to attain the purposes of this Agreement.
Nothing in this Agreement, nor the work set forth in this Agreement, nor any activity approved or carried out by the TASK FORCE AGENCIES hereunder, is intended to be nor shall be interpreted as a waiver by TASK FORCE AGENCIES of the "Maximum Extent Practicable" standard set forth in the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. Section 1251 et seq.)
Each TASK FORCE AGENCY shall indemnify, defend, and hold each of the other TASK FORCE AGENCIES, including their special districts, of?cials, agents, of?cers, and employees, harmless from and against any and all liability and expense arising from any act or omission of such TASK FORCE AGENCY, its of?cials, agents, of?cers, and employees, in connection with this Agreement, including but not limited to defense costs, legal fees, claims, actions, and causes of action for damages of any nature whatsoever, including but not limited to bodily injury, death, personal injury, or property damage; provided, however, that no TASK FORCE AGENCY shall indemnify another TASK FORCE AGENCY for that TASK FORCE AGENCY‘s own negligence or willful misconduct.
MARB, as an agency of the federal government, is unable to indemnify or hold harmless any other TASK FORCE AGENCY for any liability arising under this agreement. MARB expressly does not indemnify or hold harmless any other TASK FORCE AGENCY for any injuries or liabilities, to itself, to any third party or to MARE, or its employees under this agreement or any activities carried out under authority of this agreement.
18.J.
Lake Elsinore/Canyon Lake TMDL Task Force Agreement
11. 12.
13. I4.
15. In light of the provisions of Section 895.2 of the Government Code of the State of California imposing certain tort liability jointly upon public entities solely by reason of such entities being parties to an agreement (as de?ned in Section 895 of said Code), each of the TASK FORCE AGENCIES hereto, pursuant to the authorization contained in Sections 895.4 and 895.6 of said Code, shall assume the full liability imposed upon it or any of its of?cers, agents, or employees by law for injury caused by any act or omission occurring in the performance of this Agreement to the same extent that such liability would be imposed in the absence of Section 895.2 of said Code‘ To achieve the above stated purpose, each of the TASK FORCE AGENCIES indemni?es, defends, and holds harmless each other TASK FORCE AGENCY for any liability, cost, or expense that may be imposed upon such other TASK FORCE AGENCY solely by virtue of said Section 895.2. The provisions of Section 2778 of the California Civil Code are made a part hereof as if incorporated herein.
MARB, as an agency of the federal government, is unable to indemnify or hold harmless any other TASK FORCE AGENCY for any liability arising under this agreement. MARE expressly does not indemnify or hold harmless any TASK FORCE AGENCY for any injuries or liabilities, to itself, to any third party or to MAKE or their employees under this agreement or any activities carried out under authority of this agreement. Tort liability for federal employees, including employees of MARB, is expressly authorized and limited by the Federal Tort Claims Act, which will control liability of MARB and their employees under the terms of this agreement.
All obligations of CALTRANS under the terms of this Agreement are subject to the appropriation of the resources by the Legislature and the allocation of resources by the California Transportation Commission. This Agreement has been written before ascertaining the availability of Federal or State legislative appropriation of funds, for the mutual bene?t of the TASK FORCE AGENCIES in order to avoid program and ?scal delays that would occur if the Agreement were executed after that determination was made. This Agreement is valid and enforceable as to each of the CALTRANS as if suf?cient funds have been made available to CALTRANS by the United States Government or California State Legislature for the purposes set forth in this Agreement. If the United States Government or the California State Legislature does not appropriate suf?cient funds for CALTRANS to participate in this Agreement, this Agreement may be amended in writing by the TASK FORCE AGENCIES to re?ect any agreed-upon reduction in the percentage of funds contributed by CALTRANS to continue its participation in this Agreement. CALTRANS, however, has the option to withdraw from this Agreement in the event suf?cient funds are not appropriated for CALTRANS.
Should CALTRANS exercise its option to withdraw from this Agreement, CALTRANS shall remain responsible for its share of liability, if any, incurred while participating in this Agreement.
No TASK FORCE AGENCY shall have a ?nancial obligation to any other TASK FORCE AGENCY under this Agreement, except as expressly provided herein.
Any notices, invoices, reports, correspondence, or other communication concerning this Agreement shall be directed to the TASK FORCE AGENCY REPRESENTATIVE on ?le with the TASK FORCE ADMINISTRATOR, except that any TASK FORCE AGENCY may change its name or address by giving the other TASK FORCE AGENCIES at least ten days written notice of the new name or address.
The TASK FORCE AGENCIES are, and shall at all times remain as to each other, wholly independent entities. No TASK FORCE AGENCY to this Agreement shall have power to incur any debt, obligation, or liability on behalf of any other TASK FORCE AGENCY unless expressly provided to the contrary by this Agreement. No employee, agent, or of?cer of a TASK FORCE AGENCY shall be deemed for any purpose whatsoever to be an agent, employee or of?cer of another TASK FORCE AGENCY.
18.J.
Lake Elsinore/Canyon Lake TMDL Task Force Agreement
16. 17.
18. 19.
20. 21.
22. 23.
This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the bene?t of the respective successors, heirs, and assigns of each TASK FORCE AGENCY.
This Agreement shall be governed by. interpreted under, and construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California, except as to the March Air Reserve Base to whom federal law is applicable.
If any provision of this Agreement shall be determined by any court to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable to any extent, the remainder of this Agreement shall not be affected and this Agreement shall be construed as if the invalid, illegal, or unenforceable provision had never been contained in this Agreement.
Each individual TASK FORCE AGENCY has been represented by its own separate counsel in the preparation and negotiation of this Agreement. Accordingly, this Agreement shall be construed according to its fair language and any ambiguities shall not be resolved against the drafting TASK FORCE AGENCY.
Each of the persons signing below on behalf of a TASK FORCE AGENCY represents and warrants that he or she is authorized to sign this Agreement on behalf of such TASK FORCE AGENCY, Duration of Agreement. This Agreement shall terminate June 30, 2017 (unless extended by mutual agreement of all TASK FORCE AGENCIES), provided that all debts and liabilities of the TASK FORCE are satis?ed. Notwithstanding the foregoing, each TASK FORCE AGENCY reserves the right to withdraw from the TASK FORCE at any time, upon sixty (60) days prior written notice to the TASK FORCE. TASK FORCE contingency, projects, and studies underway at the time of withdrawal shall continue to be fully funded by the withdrawing TASK FORCE AGENCY until the end of the ?scal year in which the TASK FORCE AGENCY gave notice to withdraw.
Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed simultaneously or in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, and together shall constitute one and the same instrument.
Amendment. This Agreement may not be amended except in a writing signed by all the TASK FORCE AGENCIES.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the TASK FORCE AGENCIES have executed this AGREEMENT on the date set forth below:
10
18.J.
Exhibit A
Approved FY 2012-13 Budget: Lake Elsinore & Canyon Lake TMDL Task Force Summary Task Force Expenditures
Part A: Task Force Regulatory/Administrative Budget
, Task Force Administration
6-2012
Budget
2012-13
50,000
Task Force Administrator (LESJWA)
Annual Water Quality Reporting and Database Management
Amend Task Force Agreement
Grant Preparation
. TMDL Compliance Expert 50,000
Risk Sciences
. Pollutant Trading Program Development $ 60,000
TBD
‘ Contingency (approximately 10% of direct stakeholder expenses) TMDL Task Force Regulatory/Administrative Budget
Part B: TMDL Implementation Project Budget
. TMDL Compliance Monitoring
Watershed-wide Nutrient Monitoring Program
$ 16,000
$ 176,000
Watershed-wide Nutrient Monitoring& Report Preparation (Weston Solutions) Wet Year Watershed—wide Monitoring(weather dependant) (RCFC&WCD) Lab Analysis, Watershed—wide Monitoring(RCFC&WCD)
Stream gauge 0&M (RCFC&WCD)
Lake Elsinore Nutrient Monitoring Program
Lake Elsinore Nutrient Monitoring& Lab Analysis (EVMWD) Canyon Lake Nutrient Monitoring Program
Canyon Lake Nutrient Monitoring & Lab Analysis (EVMWD)
, Lake Elsinore Project Alternatives
Aeration & Destratification System 0&M (to be handled by separate agreement) 0&M
Pollutant Trading Administration (3% of 0&M Costs)
Fishery Management 0&M
Carp Removal Program
Pollutant Trading Administration (3% of 0&M Costs)
. Canyon Lake Project Alternatives 220,000
Permitting 30,000
0&M Agreement 20,000
Detailed Design 150,000
Construction
0&M
Project Administration (10% of budgeted expenses)
Pollutant Trading Administration (3% of 0&M Costs)
$
$
TMDL Task Force Implementation Budget
TMDL Task Force Budget :
$
$
$
305,000
481,000
18.J.
Exhibit A 6-2012
. . Bud et Task Force Agency Contributions Summary 2012?” . Administrative ijw
. 1. Task Force Agency Allocation Implementation Total (Part A) (Part B) M84 Co-Permittees (TotaD $ 105,600 0 249,953 5 355,588
Riverside County $ 18,981 $ 44,935 $ 63,916
City of Beaumont $ 2,249 $ 5,324 $ 7,574
City of Canyon Lake 5 1.958 $ 4,636 $ 6,595
City of Hemet $ 13,087 $ 30,980 $ 44,067
City of Lake Elsinore 5 6,955 $
, 16,466 $ 23.421
City of Moreno Valley 5 30,284 $ 71,691 _$ 101.974
City of Murrieta $ 375 $ 688 $ 1.263
City of Perris $ 9,560 $ 22,632 $ 32,192
City of Riverside 5 1,710 $ 4,047 $ 5.757
City of San Jacinto $ 6,420 $ 15,197 $ 21,617
City of Menifee $ 11,796 $ 27,925 $ 39,721
City of Wildomar $ 2,225 $ 5,267 $ 7,492
Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD) 3 8,800 5 4,250 $ 13,050 San Jacinto Agricultural Operators 5 8.800 $ 19,478 5 28,278 San Jacinto Dairy & CAFO Operators 5 8,800 $ 10,034 $ 18,834 CALTRANS - freeway 3 8,800 $ 4,250 s 13,050
CA DF&G - San Jacinto Wetlands 5 8.800 5 4,250 $ 13,050 Eastern Municipal Water District 5 8,800 5 4,250 3 13,050 March Air Reserve Base Joint Powers Authority 5 8,800 5 4,250 5 13,050 US Air Force tMarchAir Reserve Basel 5 8,800 5 4,250 $ 13,050 Total Funding Required $ 176,000 $ 305,000 $ 481,000
Notes:
Task Force Administration
a. Organize and facilitate TMDLTASK FORCE and TAG meetings, b. Perform secretarial, clerical and administrative services, including providing meeting summaries to TMDL TASK FORCE members, 0, Manage TMDLTASK FORCE funds and prepare annual reports of TMDLTASK FORCE assets and expenditures, d. Serve as the contracting party, for the bene?t of the TMDLTASK FORCE, for contracts with all consultants, contractors, vendors and other entities,
e. Seek funding grants to assist with achieving goals and objectives of the TMDLTASK FORCE. f. Coordinate with other agencies and organizations as necessary to facilitate TMDLTASK FORCE work.
9. Administer the preparation of quarterly and annual reports, as required by the TMDLImplementation Plan. and submit them as required by the TMDL Implementation Plan on behalf of the TMDLTASK FORCE. h. Possible administrator of future pollutant trading (water quality trading) agreements.
TMDLCompliance Expert
a. Support Task Force Agency as a Regulatory Strategist and Compliance Expert . b, Develop implementation strategy to address TMDLcompliance with nutrient targets c. Plan and prepare Basin Plan Amendment for TMDL
d. Sub-contract out pollutant trading agreement preparation by consultant
18.J.
Exhibit A 6-2012
Task Force Agency Contributions Detailed Tables
Part A: Task Force Regulatory/Administrative Budget
Task Force Regulatory/Administrative Expenses Allocation M54 Co-Permittees l $ 105,600
Riverside County $ 18,981
City of Beaumont $ 2,249
City of Canyon Lake 55 1,958
City of Hemet $ 13,087
City of Lake Elsinore $ 6,955
City of Moreno Valley $ 30,284
City of Murrieta $ 375
City of Perris $ 9,560
City of Riverside $ 1,710
City of San Jacinto $ 6,420
City of Menifee $ 11,796
City of Wildomar $ 2,225
Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD) $ 0,800 San Jacinto Agricultural Operators $ 8,800
San Jacinto Dairy & CAFO Operators 5 8,800
CALTRANS - freeway $ 8,800
CA DF&G - San Jacinto Wetlands 5 8,800
Eastern Municipal Water District 5 8,800
March Air Reserve Base Joint Powers Authority 3 8,800
US Air Force tMarchAir Reserve Base! 5 8,800
Funding Required $ 176,000
Part B: TMDL Implementation Project Budget
TMDL Compliance Monitoring Expenses
Watershed-wide Nutrient Monitoring Program Allocation
M54 Co-Permit‘tees $ 51,000
Riverside County $ 9,167
City of Beaumont $ 1,086
City of Canyon Lake $ 946
City of Hemet $ 6,320
City of Lake Elsinore $ 3,359
City of Moreno Valley 55 14,626
City of Murrieta $ 181
City of Perris $ 4,617
City of Riverside $ 826
City of San Jacinto $ 3,100
City of Menifee $ 5,697
City of Wildomar $ 1,075
Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD) $ 4.250 San Jacinto Agricultural Operators 5 4.250
San Jacinto Dairy & CAFO Operators $ 4,250
CALTRANS - freeway 5 4,250
CA DF&G - San Jacinto Wetlands 3 4,250
Eastern Municipal Water District 5 4,250
March Air Reserve Base Joint Powers Authority $ 4,250
US Air Force gMarchAir Reserve Basel $ 4,250
Funding Required $ 85,000
18.J.
Exhibit A
Lake Elsinore Nutrient Monitoring Program
62012
Allocation
M54 Co—Permittees
Riverside County
City of Beaumont
City of Canyon Lake
City of Hemet
City of Lake Elsinore
City of Moreno Valley
City of Murrieta
City of Perris
City of Riverside
City of San Jacinto
City of Menifee
City of Wildomar
Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD)
San Jacinto Agricultural Operators
San Jacinto Dairy & CAFO Operators
CALTRANS - freeway
CA DF&G - San Jacinto Wetlands
Eastern Municipal Water District
March Air Reserve Base Joint Powers Authority
Canyon Lake Nutrient Monitoring Program
US Air Force (MarchAir Reserve Basel
Funding Required
Allocation
M54 Co-Permittees
Riverside County
City of Beaumont
City of Canyon Lake
City of Hemet
City of Lake Elsinore
City of Moreno Valley
City of Murrieta
City of Perris
City of Riverside
City of San Jacinto
City of Menifee
City of Wildomar
Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD)
San Jacinto Agricultural Operators
San Jacinto Dairy & CAFO Operators
CALTRANS - freeway
CA DF&G - San Jacinto Wetlands
Eastern Municipal Water District
March Air Reserve Base Joint Powers Authority
US Air Force [MarchAir Reserve Base!
Funding Required
5 $
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
_
$
$
$
$
$
5 $
3 $
$
$ .
18.J.
Exhibit A
Lake Elsinore Project Alternatives
Aeration & Destratification System 0&M
6-2012
Allocation
M54 Co-Permittees
Riverside County
City of Beaumont
City of Canyon Lake
City of Hemet
City of Lake Elsinore
City of Moreno Valley
City of Murrieta
City of Perris
City of Riverside
City of San Jacinto
City of Menifee
City of Wildomar
Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD)
San Jacinto Agricultural Operators
San Jacinto Dairy & CAFO Operators
CALTRANS - freeway
CA DF&G - San Jacinto Wetlands
Eastern Municipal Water District
March Air Reserve Base Joint Powers Authority
Lake Elsinore Project Alternatives
Fishery Management 0&M
US Air Force gMarchAir Reserve Base!
Funding Required
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$ _
$
$
5 S
$
$
5 5
S
$
s .
Allocation
MS4 Co-Permittees
Riverside County
City of Beaumont
City of Canyon Lake
City of Hemet
City of Lake Elsinore
City of Moreno Valley
City of Murrieta
City of Perris
City of Riverside
City of San Jacinto
City of Menifee
City of Wildomar
Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD)
San Jacinto Agricultural Operators
San Jacinto Dairy 8. CAFO Operators
CALTRANS - freeway
CA DF&G - San Jacinto Wetlands
Eastern Municipal Water District
March Air Reserve Base Joint Powers Authority
US Air Force [MarchAir Reserve Basel
Funding Required
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
_
$
$
$
5 S
$
$
5 S
S
l—
s .
18.J.
Exhibit A 6-2012
Canyon Lake Project Alternatives
Allocation
MS4 Co-Permittees 5 198,983
Riverside County $ 35,767
City of Beaumont $ 4,238
City of Canyon Lake $ 3,690
City of Hemet $ 24,660
City of Lake Elsinore $ 13,106
City of Moreno Valley $ 57,065
City of Murrieta $ 707
City of Perris $ 13,015
City of Riverside $ 3.221
City of San Jacinto $ 12.097
City of Menifee $ 22,228
City of Wildomar $ 4,193
Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWDL s - San Jacinto Agricultural Operators 5 15,228 San Jacinto Dairy & CAFO Operators 5 5,784
CALTRANS - freeway
CA DF&G - San Jacinto Wetlands
Eastern Municipal Water District 5 - March Air Reserve Base Joint Powers Authority US Air Force {MarchAir Reserve Basel
$ 220,000
Cost formula : based upon the 1:1 ratio of TP to TN contributions from urban and agricultural runoff as projected in the respective Riverside County Comprehensive Nutrient Reduction Plan and San jacinto Agricultural Nutrient Reduction Plan
18.J.
Exhibit A 6—2012
Task Force Agency Contributions Detailed Tables
Allocation
M54 Co-Permittees (TotaD $ 355,588
Task Force Regulatory/Administrative Expenses $ 105,600 TMDL Compliance Monitoring Expenses
Watershed-wide Nutrient Monitoring Program 99 51,000
Lake Elsinore Nutrient Monitoring Program 15 -
Canyon Lake Nutrient Monitoring Program $ -
Lake Elsinore Project Alternatives
Aeration & Destratification System 0&M $ -
Fishery Management 0&M $ -
Canyon Lake Project Alternatives $ 198,988
F
Riverside County ' ' $ 63,916
Task Force Regulatory/Administrative Expenses $ 18.981
TMDL Compliance Monitoring Expenses
Watershed-wide Nutrient Monitoring Program $ 9,167
Lake Elsinore Nutrient Monitoring Program 35 -
Canyon Lake Nutrient Monitoring Program $ -
Lake Elsinore Project Alternatives
Aeration 8. Destratification System 0&M $ -
Fishery Management 0&M $ -
Canyon Lake Project Alternatives 3% 35,767
$
_
r r City of Beaumont I I $ 7,574
Task Force Regulatory/Administrative Expenses $ 2,249
TMDL Compliance Monitoring Expenses
Watershed-wide Nutrient Monitoring Program $ 1,086
Lake Elsinore Nutrient Monitoring Program 25 -
Canyon Lake Nutrient Monitoring Program 35 -
Lake Elsinore Project Alternatives
Aeration & Destrati?cation System 0&M $ -
Fishery Management 0&M $ -
Canyon Lake Project Alternatives $ 4,238
City of Canyon Lake 5
Task Force Regulatory/Administrative Expenses $ 1,958
TMDL Compliance Monitoring Expenses
Watershed—wide Nutrient Monitoring Program $ 946
Lake Elsinore Nutrient Monitoring Program 35 -
Canyon Lake Nutrient Monitoring Program 3 -
Lake Elsinore Project Alternatives
Aeration & Destratiflcation System 08M 5 .
Fishery Management 0&M $ -
Canyon Lake Project Alternatives $ 3,690
18.J.
ExhibitA 6-2012
City of Hemet I l $ 44,067
Task Force Regulatory/Administrative Expenses $ 13,087
TMDL Compliance Monitoring Expenses
Watershed-wide Nutrient Monitoring Program $ 6,320
Lake Elsinore Nutrient Monitoring Program $ - Canyon Lake Nutrient Monitoring Program $ - Lake Elsinore Project Alternatives
Aeration 8. Destratification System 0&M $ -
Fishery Management 08M 5 -
Canyon Lake Project Alternatives 3 24,660
City of Lake Elsinore $ 23,421
Task Force RegulatoryIAdministrative Expenses $ 6,955
TMDL Compliance Monitoring Expenses
Watershed-wide Nutrient Monitoring Program 35 3,359
Lake Elsinore Nutrient Monitoring Program $ - Canyon Lake Nutrient Monitoring Program i $ - Lake Elsinore Project Alternatives
Aeration & Destratification System 0&M $ -
Fishery Management 0&M $ '
Canyon Lake Project Alternatives $ 13,106
——
City of Moreno Valley $ 101,974
Task Force Regulatory/Administrative Expenses $ 30,284
TMDL Compliance Monitoring Expenses
Watershed-wide Nutrient Monitoring Program 35 14,626
Lake Elsinore Nutrient Monitoring Program $ - Canyon Lake Nutrient Monitoring Program 35 - Lake Elsinore Project Alternatives
Aeration & Destrati?cation System 08M 33 .
Fishery Management 08M 5 -
Canyon Lake Project Alternatives $ 57,065
——
City of Murrieta $ 1,263
Task Force Regulatory/Administrative Expenses $ 375
TMDL Compliance Monitoring Expenses
Watershed-wide Nutrient Monitoring Program $ 181
Lake Elsinore Nutrient Monitoring Program $ - Canyon Lake Nutrient Monitoring Program $ - Lake Elsinore Project Alternatives
Aeration & Destrati?cation System 0&M $ -
Fishery Management 0&M $ -
Canyon Lake Project Alternatives $ 707
18.J.
Exhibit A 6-2012
City of Perris i$ 32,192
Task Force Regulatory/Administrative Expenses $ 9,560
TMDL Compliance Monitoring Expenses
Watershed-wide Nutrient Monitoring Program 35 4,517
Lake Elsinore Nutrient Monitoring Program $ - Canyon Lake Nutrient Monitoring Program $ - Lake Elsinore Project Alternatives
Aeration & Destratification System 08M 9: -
Fishery Management 0&M $ -
Canyon Lake Project Alternatives $ 18,015
City of Riverside $ 5,757
Task Force Regulatory/Administrative Expenses $ 1,710
TMDL Compliance Monitoring Expenses
Watershed-wide Nutrient Monitoring Program ".5 826
Lake Elsinore Nutrient Monitoring Program $ - Canyon Lake Nutrient Monitoring Program $ - Lake Elsinore Project Alternatives
Aeration & Destratification System 0&M $ -
Fishery Management 0&M $ -
Canyon Lake Project Alternatives $ 3,221
———————_——
City of San Jacinto $ 21,617
Task Force Regulatory/Administrative Expenses 5 6,420
TMDL Compliance Monitoring Expenses
Watershed-wide Nutrient Monitoring Program 3 3,100
Lake Elsinore Nutrient Monitoring Program $ - Canyon Lake Nutrient Monitoring Program $ - Lake Elsinore Project Alternatives
Aeration & Destrati?cation System 0&M $ -
Fishery Management 08M 5 -
Canyon Lake Project Alternatives $ 12,097
City of Menifee $ 39,721
Task Force Regulatory/Administrative Expenses $ 11,796
TMDL Compliance Monitoring Expenses
Watershed-wide Nutrient Monitoring Program 55 5,697
Lake Elsinore Nutrient Monitoring Program $ - Canyon Lake Nutrient Monitoring Program $ - Lake Elsinore Project Alternatives
Aeration & Destrati?cation System 08M 3 —
Fishery Management 0&M $ —
Canyon Lake Project Alternatives $ 22.228
18.J.
Exhibit A 6—2012
City of Wildomar $ 7,492
Task Force Regulatory/Administrative Expenses $ 2,225
TMDL Compliance Monitoring Expenses
Watershed-wide Nutrient Monitoring Program $ 1,075
Lake Elsinore Nutrient Monitoring Program $ - Canyon Lake Nutrient Monitoring Program $ - Lake Elsinore Project Alternatives
Aeration & Destratification System 0&M $ -
Fishery Management 0&M $ -
Canyon Lake Project Alternatives $ 4,193
Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD) $ 13,050 Task Force Regulatory/Administrative Expenses $ 8,800
TMDL Compliance Monitoring Expenses
Watershed-wide Nutrient Monitoring Program $ 4250
Lake Elsinore Nutrient Monitoring Program $ —
Canyon Lake Nutrient Monitoring Program 35 -
Lake Elsinore Project Alternatives
Aeration & Destratiflcation System 0&M $ -
Fishery Management 0&M $ -
Canyon Lake Project Alternatives $ -
San Jacinto Agricultural Operators $ 28,278
Task Force Regulatory/Administrative Expenses $ 8,800
TMDL Compliance Monitoring Expenses
Watershed-wide Nutrient Monitoring Program $ 4,250
Lake Elsinore Nutrient Monitoring Program $ -
Canyon Lake Nutrient Monitoring Program $ -
Lake Elsinore Project Alternatives
Aeration & Destratification System 0&M $ -
Fishery Management 0&M $ -
Canyon Lake Project Alternatives $ 15,228
San Jacinto Dairy & CAFO Operators $ 18,834
Task Force Regulatory/Administrative Expenses $ 8.800
TMDL Compliance Monitoring Expenses
Watershed—wide Nutrient Monitoring Program $ 4,250
Lake Elsinore Nutrient Monitoring Program $ - Canyon Lake Nutrient Monitoring Program $ - Lake Elsinore Project Alternatives
Aeration & Destrati?cation System 0&M $ —
Fishery Management 08M 8 .
Canyon Lake Project Alternatives $ 5,784
18.J.
Exhibit A 6-2012
CALTRANS - freeway $ 13,050
Task Force Regulatory/Administrative Expenses $ 8,800
TMDL Compliance Monitoring Expenses
Watershed-wide Nutrient Monitoring Program j 51‘: 4.250 Lake Elsinore Nutrient Monitoring Program $ -
Canyon Lake Nutrient Monitoring Program 53 —
Lake Elsinore Project Alternatives
Aeration & Destratifican‘on System 0&M $ -
Fishery Management 0&M $ -
Canyon Lake Project Alternatives $
_ ——i
CA DF&G - San Jacinto Wetlands $ 13,050
Task Force Regulatory/Administrative Expenses $ 8.800
TMDLCompliance Monitoring Expenses
Watershed-wide Nutrient Monitoring Program $ 4,250
Lake Elsinore Nutrient Monitoring Program $ -
Canyon Lake Nutrient Monitoring Program $ -
Lake Elsinore Project Alternatives
Aeration & Destrati?cation System 0&M $ -
Fishery Management 0&M $ -
Canyon Lake Project Alternatives $ »
Eastern Municipal Water District 3 13,050
Task Force Regulatory/Administrative Expenses $ 8300
TMDL Compliance Monitoring Expenses
Watershed-wide Nutrient Monitoring Program $ 4250
Lake Elsinore Nutrient Monitoring Program $ -
Canyon Lake Nutrient Monitoring Program $ -
Lake Elsinore Project Alternatives
Aeration & Destrati?cation System O&M $ -
Fishery Management 0&M $
_
Canyon Lake Project Alternatives $ -
March Air Reserve Base Joint Powers Authority 5 13,050
Task Force Regulatory/Administrative Expenses $ 8,800
TMDL Compliance Monitoring Expenses
Watershed-wide Nutrient Monitoring Program $ 4250
Lake Elsinore Nutrient Monitoring Program $ -
Canyon Lake Nutrient Monitoring Program $ -
Lake Elsinore Project Alternatives
Aeration 8. Destratitication System 0&M $ -
Fishery Management 0&M $ -
Canyon Lake Project Alternatives 3: -
US Air Force (March Air Reserve Base) $ 13,050
Task Force Regulatory/Administrative Expenses $ 8,800
TMDL Compliance Monitori Expenses
Watershed-wide Nutrient Monitoring Program $ 4250
Lake Elsinore Nutrient Monitoring Program $ -
Canyon Lake Nutrient Monitoring Program 3 -
Lake Elsinore Project Alternatives
Aeration & Destrati?cation System 08M 3 -
Fishery Management O&M $ -
Canyon Lake Project Alternatives $ »
Total: $ 481,000
18.J.
Exhibit A 6—2012
PROJECTED - Task Force Agency Contributions through FY 2010-11 Cummulative Credit I (Debit)
MS4 Co-Permittees (Total) $ 359,205
Riverside County $ 72513
City of Beaumont $ 5,009
City of Canyon Lake $ 5,384
City of Hemet $ 33,909
City of Lake Elsinore $ 106,017
City of Moreno Valley $ 77,550
City of Murrieta $ 2,247
City of Perris $ 23,561
City of Riverside $ 3,642
City of San Jacinto $ 15,348
City of Menifee $ 11,798
City of Wildomar $ 2,225
Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD) $ 91,830 San Jacinto Agricultural Operators $ 28,935
San Jacinto Dairy & CAFO Operators $ 16,452
CALTRANS - freeway $ - CA DF&G - San Jacinto Wetlands $ - US Forest Service (USFS) $ - Eastern Municipal Water District $ - March Air Reserve Base Joint Powers Authority $ - US Air Force (March Air Reserve Base) $ - h
Total Credits 855,677
18.J.
Task . . . Bud at Bud at Bud et Force Agency Contributlons DetaIled Tables 2013?“ 201731520155310 Part A: Task Force RegulatoryIAdminlstrative Budget
Task ForceRegulatory/Administrative Ex_penses
7 7
77 7A7l7|£ation
7 7 AIIocagor717AIiocqtio
n
[M54Co-Permlltees 77 77
' "
7 il 5 95,000 s
777 7155,0017 in?oi RiversideCount 5 0,250 0 13,750 0 w 13,75 Cir7yof Eeaumgnt 7 7 77 : 7 737 773.2507757777_ 13,750 0 13 7307‘
Cityof Carly/7cmLake 5 83507L3 13.750 1s 13.7750
City of Hemet7777 7
7 7 £7577 0,250 7077 13,750 is 137507 Cityof Lake Elsinore 777 7 7 I75 8,2507 0
7 13,750 Is 13,7507
_gty of Moreno Valley
777 _
7 ias 0,250 $ 13,750I07 7137507
City70fMgrieta __ is
7 3.250$ 121,750I,s
'
’ 13750
City of Perris
77 777 7 7 7 f$ “3,250 75 173,750—" 5 13750
City of Riversidi 7
7 77
7 l l5
7 0.250 s Is‘?o 3 15.750“
City7o7f7 San Jacinto
7 77 77 77 iii 3,250 0 13.7507L37777 13,7517) 7otMenifee 7777 77 77 777 7 0 8.250 3 13,750 I $77 13.750 Cg ofWi7ldomar 7777777 7 77 77 7 7 77 77777 777 15 E57075 13,750 II5 13.750
Elsinore ValleyMunicipalWaterDistrict(EVMWD)
77777 3 0,2507 37777713.750I 3 13,750
San Jaginto Agricultural Operators
__
77 7 7 5 8.250 75 127750 737 15,7507 San JacintoDairy 51CAFO Ogerators 77 7 7777 7 77077 0.250 0 13.75777; 13.750
CALT7RANS- freeway _____
77 7777777777 7 7 7 _$7 77 0 13,750 5 13,750 CADF&G7- 7SanJacinto Wetlands 7 7777 s
7 s 13,750 7 13,750
7E7astgnMunicipalWaterDistrict
7777777777 777__
7 i7 5 13,15000
7 Air Reserve Base Joint Powers7A7uth7or|t
777 $
7 5 13,750 S
US Air Force [MarchAir Reserve Base) 3 5 13.750 5 13,750 Funding Requlred $ 165,000 $ 275.000 $ 275,000
Part B: TMDLImplementation Project Budget
TMDLCompliance Monitoring Expenses
Watersheti—wide Nutrient Monitoring Program 77 7 Allocation Allocation Allocation M84Co-Pe7r7mtttees 77 77 77 s 51,0007777 51.000 5
0'
' 51.000 RiverSIdeCounty
_
7 757 4.250 $ 4,250 5 4,250
City ofBeaumont
7 77 7 5 4,72507577 7 4,2507'5 74,250
7 City of Ca7nyonLake 5 $250 $ 4,250 3 4.27507
_ City of Hornet
7 7 7: 4,250 75 4,250 7$77 4250
City of Lake Elsinore 7 7 7 7 _ 0 4,250 5 4,250 5 472,570 City of Moreno Valley7 77777 7
777 5 4.250 s
7 4 §07 37 4,250
CityofMurrieta
7 7 a. 4.250 0
7 4.250 3 4.250
City of Ferris
7 77 70 4,250 70 4,250 0 4,250»
City of Riverside
7 0 v 0» 4.250
‘ 5 “7350‘
City ofSan Jacinto
7_
77 7 777 0 5
' ' 4.250 rs 4.250
7City ofMenIfe75777 77 7 7
7 _s
‘ 5 4.250 5
W 4,250
Cityof Wildomar
_
7 777777 7 7777 70 :5 4,25075
77 4,250
Elsinore Valley Municipal Wg?istrlcthVMWD)
7 7
7 5 S 74,2337737 752753, San Jacinto Agricultural Operators 7 777 77 7$77 s 4.25!) S 4,251 [SanJacinto Dairy 81CAFO Operators 7 _
7 7 s 7$777 4,250 5
77 4.260 CALTRANS- -freeway
77 7s7 70 4,250 $7 4,250~
2ADFRIG- San Jacintp Wetlands
7 7 777 s s
7 $3507 57777 4.2507 Easter7nM7t?irilp7a7l7wg7ter Digricl 7 7S 3
7 4.2593 0550
March Air Reserve Base Joint Powers Auth70rity77 7
7 7 7: 5 4,25075
7 4_,250_ US Air Force {MarchAir Reserve Basel s 4,250 3 4.250 3 4.250 Funding Required $ 85,000 3 85,000 $ 85.000
18.J.
Lake Elsinore Nutrient Monitoring Program7 Allocation Allocation Allocation M84 Co-Permlttees | s . 7577 700,000| 5 90,000
Riv7erside County 5 - $ 7,500]1» 7,500
City of Beaumont
7 7 7 $ - $ 7.500 0 7,500
City of Canyon Lake 0 » $ 7.500 0 7,500
Cityof Hemet
7 77 $ - $ 7.500 0 7.500
City of Lake Elsinore $ - 0 7,500 0
7 77.5007
City of Moreno Valley 7_ 77 77 s $ 7.500 $ 7,500
City of Murrieta s » 0 7,500 $ 7.500
City of Ferris S - 0 7,500 $ 7,500
Cityof Riverside 7 7 s - $ 7,500 $ 7,500
Cityof San Jacinto 7 0 » ‘ $ 7,500 0 7.500
City of Menifee
777 7 $ - 0 7,50070 7,500
City of Wildomar s - 0 7,500 |l 5 7,500
Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD) s - 5 7.500 0 7,500 i San Jacinto Agricultural Operators 7s - s 7,500 5 7.500 1 San Jacinto Dairy 8. CAFO Operators s - $ 7,500 5 7,500 i CALTRANS- freeway 77
7 7 s - l 3 7.500 5 7,500 ,‘
CA DF&G - San Jacinto Wetlands s - 3 7,500 5 7,500
Eastern Municipal Water District 77 7 i 5 - 5 7,500 5 7,500 March A' ReserveBaseJoint Pou7le7rs Authority
77 7
7 _s7 -7 77s7 7,500 7077 7,500
US A Force March Reserve Base 5 —
I 5 7.500 5 7.500
Funding Required $ - 5 150,000 $ 150.000
Canyon Lake Nutrient Monitor/rag Program Allocation Allocation Allocation M84 Co-Permittees !s - ‘ 3 01,059 5 91,050
Riverside County I0 0 0.024 $ 0.024
City of Beaumont las 0 0,024 0 0.024
City of (Eamon Lake
7 i 0 - 0 0,024 , $ 0,024
City of Hemet 7577 7
» 5 3.024 0 0.024
City of Lake Elsinore . 0 $ 0,024 0 0.0247
City of Moreno Valley i 0 - 0 0,024 0 8,824
City of Murrieta l 0 a 0.024 > 0 0,024
City of Ferris _ 3 » $ 0.024 0 0,024
City of Riverside 0 » 0 0,0727 0 0.024
City of San Jaginto77 0 - $ 8,824 5 0,024
City of Menitee 7 s
’ 0 5.024 a 0.024
Cityof Wildomar Si - s - $ -
Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD)
7 7 3 - S
. $ -
San Jacinto Agricultural Operators s - 3 0,024 5 0.024
San Jacinto Dairy & CAFO Operators s - 3 0.024 5 0,024
CALTRANS - freeway s 5 0.024 5 0,024
70ADF&G :7SanJacintowetlands77 7 7 7 7 7077 75777 0,0247! 3 0.024 Eastern Municipal Water District FS 5 - S - MarchAir Reserve Base Joint Powers Authority 77 s 7 I s
777 0,024 3 0&4
iUSA' Force March Air Reserve Base 5 -
‘ 3 0,024 5 0,024
Funding Required 3 » $ 150,000 $ 150,000
Lake Elsinore Project Alternatives
Aeration & Destiati?catl'onSystem 0&M Allocation Allocation Allocation M84 Co-Fermlttees s
7 l S $ -
7 Ri7v7er7si7de County S
W
- $ - $ -
City 01 Beaumont 0 » $ » $ -
City of Canyon Lake $ , , 3 — $ »
City 01Hemel 5 - i 5 S -
City 01 Lake Elsinore 5 » i S » 7$ -
City of Moreno Valley $ ,
‘ S - l S -
City of Murrieta s - $ - i s -
City of Perris S v E: - $ -
City of Rlverside 77 7 7 3» - $ » $
Cityof San Jacinto s - $ - 0
City of Menifee
7 77 S 7' 73 $ - 2
City of Wiiqomar
7 7 77 77777 77 7
7 7 $
7 7- 70 »
Elsinore Yalley Municipal Water District (EVMWD) iS S - J §an JacintoAgr‘lculturai Operators _ 7 7 7 5
7 - §7 7
-
7 75777
.
San Jacinto Dairy & CAFOOperators 3 S - V$
CALTRANS - freeway s s - s -
CA DF&G - San Jacinto Wetlands .3 - 5 - s -
Eastern Municipal Water District
7 77
' s - S - t s - March Air Reserve Base Joint Powers Authority 7 s -
7 s - I S -
US Air Force lMarchAir Reserve Base} s - S - $ -
Funding Required » $ - $ -
18.J.
Lake Elsinore Project Alternatives
Fishery Management 0&M Allocation Allocation Allocation rM54Co-Permittee7s7
Riverside County
77 City of Beaumont
7 City of Canyon Lake
City of Heme!
, Pity QELaKejlsimre,
City of Moreno Valley77
Citygt Murrieta
City of Perris
City of Riverside
City of San Jacinto
City of Menifee
City of Wildomag
Elsinore Valley Municipal WaterDistrict (EVMWD)
San Jacinto Agricultural Operators
San Jacinto Dairy 8-CAFO Operators
CALTRANS - freeway
CA DF&G - San Jacinto Wetlands
Eeeter??unicmel Wgter DistrLCL._ , March Air Reserve Base Joint Powers Authqrjty 7 US Air Force gMarchAir Reserve Basel
Funding Required $ - $ - $ ~
Canyon Lake Project Alternatives
Alum Additlon
777 Allocation Allocation Allocation
MS4 Co-Permittees
77 _ s
77 73530.00!)75 407.000 5 407,000 ‘
Riverside County 3 E631? $7 75,004 it W 75,004
City of Beaumont $ 7.206 5 8.887 5 3.537"
Cityof Canyon Lake
77 7 $ 6.274 $ 7,739 $ 7,739
7 City of Heme?'
7 3 41,928 $ 51.711 $ 51.711
City of Lake Elsinore
7 77777
7 77
_
5 22,284 3
7 27,454 $
‘ 27,4547
City of Moreno Valley 5 97,025 as 119,664 $ 119,564
City of Murrieta_
_ s - S » S - City of Penis
‘
i 3 30.630 $ 37,777 3
7 37,777
City of Riverside
7 5 5,477 $ 5.755 $ 6,755
City of San Jacinto s 20.33377$ 25.367 :5 25,367
City of Menifee $ “37.794 $ 46.612 3 46.612
City of Wildomar
7 7 7 7 7 s — S - 3 . .
Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD)
"7’ s _
- s - s -
San Jacinto Agricultural Operators i s s
77 7 7 s
7 -
San Jacinto Dairy &§AFQ Operatgi?
777 7
- s - s
V . CALTRANS- freeway
7 - s - $77 - CA7DF&G- San Jar; {97M'73?157
7777
7 7 77 7 L -
7 7&7777 -7 s - Eastern Municipal Water District
7 V 7 7 s if": s - s’ 7 777."
March Air Reserve Base Joint Powers Authority 3 - 5 ~ $ - US Air Force iMarchAir Reserve Base! 5 ~ 3 - $ - I 5 330,000 S 407,000 $ 407,000
18.J.
Task Force Agency Contributions Detailed Tables
Allocation Allocation Allocation
M54 Co-Permittees (Total) $ 480,000 $ 810,059 $ 810,059 Task Force ReguiatoryiAuministrativeExpenses 0 99,000 5 165,000 $ 105,000 TMDLCompliance MonitoringExpenses
777 7 77 77 7 7 7 777 7 7 7 Watersneo-wide Nutrient Monitoring Program7" 7 $ 51,006 5 51,000 is 51,000 Lake Elsinore Nutrient MonitoringProgram 7 7 _ 777 7 S » S 970,000$ 90,000 7' " ’6anyonLatteNutrientMonitoring Program
7 ' ' V s
7 '
- 5
W 07,050 $ 97,059‘
Lake Elsinore Project Alternatives
7 Aeration & Desirati?cationSystem 08M
7 s - s » s -
Fishery Management 05M 5 » s - $ -
Canyon Lake Projecl Alternatives 7' V 7 '7 3 330,000 3 407,000 3 407,000 —————__—Fl'—’—_'
Riverside 7C_ounty SE$ 73,314 $ 109,327 E$ 109,327
Task Force Regulatory/Administrative Expenses
7 5 8,250 $ 13,750 $ 13,750
TMDL Compliance Monitoring Expenses
Watershed-wide Nutrient Monitoring Program 77 7 777 3 4,250 $ 4,250 $ 4.250 Lake Elsinore Nutrient Monitoring Program
¥ 3 - 3 7,500 $ 7,500
Canyon Lake Nut7rient Monitoring Program $ v 5 6.824 $ 8.824 Lake Elsinore Project Alternatives
7 Aeration & Destrati?cationSystem 08M 5 - 3 - $ 7
Fishery Management 08M 0
. l is . s -
Canyon Lake Project Alternatives $ 60,014 0 75,004 3: 75.004 City of Beaumont 19,706 i S 43,211 43,211
Task Force Regulatory/Administrative Expenses 5 8,250 5 13.750 3 13,750 TMDLComplianee Monitoring Expenses
Watersh’edeivitie’ Nutrient Monitoring Program 0 4.250 s 777 4,250 0 4.250
Lake Elsinore Nutrient Monitoring Program $ — $ 7,500 $ 7.500 Canyon Lake Nutrient Monitoring Program _ 7 5 - $ 8.524 3 8.824 Lake Elsinore Project Alternatives
,.
I
Aeration & DestratiticationSystem—(MM7
,7 $ - $ — $ .
Fishery MenagementOStM
: s . i 7 7 7
- .3 .
7 ganyonLake Project Alternatives ’3 7.206 $ 8.887 $ 8,887 City of Canyon Lake 777 $ 18,774 42,062 42,062
Task Force Regulatory/Administrative Expenses
7 3: 8,250 $ 13.750 5 13.750
TMDLCompliance Monitoring Expenses
Watershed-wide Nutrient Monitoring Program
A V ’7 0 4,250 5 4,250 0 4,250
Lake Elsinore Nutrient Morr7itor7ing Program 0 - a; 7.500 5 7,500 Canyon Lake Nuirient Monitoring Program $ - 7$ 8.324 5 8.824 Lake Elsinore Project Alternatives
7 7 V Aeration a.DestratincationSystem 0&M
_
$
. s - 5 »
Fishery Management 084M
7 '0” - s - s -
Canyon Lake P ct Alternatives
7 0 5,274 5 7,739 5 7.739
E r
'
City orHemet 54,428 i 5 86,035 0 86,035
Task Force RegulatorylAdministrative Expenses 8,250 0 13,750 5 13.750 TMDLCompliance Monitoring Expenses
Watershed-wide Nutrient Monitoring Program 3 4.250 $ 4.250 0 4,250 Lake Elsinore Nutrient Monitoring Program | 0 , 5 7.500 5 7.500 Canyon Lake Nutrient Monitoring ProgramW
i 0 - 0 78.8245
77 8.024
LakeElsinoreProject Alternatives 1 7' Aeration a Destratirieation Syslem 0&M i s » $ » s - Fishery Management 08M 5 - s - $ -
Canyon Lake Project Alternatives 5 41,928 $ 51.711 5 51,711
18.J.
City ofLakeElsinore
$ 34,784$
7 $ 61,808
Task F70rceRegulatoryIAdministrative E7xpansEs 77 75 8.250 7 7:5
7 7l3.7570
TMDL Compliance Monitoring Expenses
77 77
7 7
7 Watershed-wide Nutrient Monitoring Program
7 77
5 4.250
0 4.2567
Lake Elsinore Nutrient Monitoring Program
77 5 7.500
0 7500
Canyon Lake NutrientMonitoringProgram
7 77
7 5 3.3245 8.824
LakeElsinore 7i=roiect Alternatives
77 7
''''''7
7 Aeratlon& DesiratirroationSystem703M777
0 . ls - $ -
Fishery Management 0er
s - j o - 7
$ - Canyon Lake Project Alternatives
77777
7777
$ 272.2?‘7 0 27m
5 27,7547
h——————————_—_—_ —_
City of Moreno Valley
3 109525
$ 153,988
$ 153,988
Task F7rceRegulatorylAcTnTinistratlve Expenses
7 737777 777072507 37 137$
s 1377507
TMDLCompliance Monitoring Expenses
7 """"
Watershed-wide Nutrient Monitoring Program .$ 4.250
3 4.25703» 4.250
Lake Elsinore Nutrient Monitortng Program
777
.1s - $ 7.500
a 7.500
Canyon Lake NutrientMonitoringProgram
7 l_3 - $ 8.824 7LakeElsinore PmlectAlternatives 7 77 7 77 7 ‘, Aeration & Destrati?cation System 00M 77 i $ , s - $ -
Fishery Management 0&M
7 ,s - s - s - 7
Canyon Lake Project Alternatives
7_
77 7 77777
77 5 97.025
5 119.664
$ 119.664
—-———-————-___—______ 5%
City of Murrieta
$ 12,500
$ 34,324
$ 34,324
Task Force Regulatory/Administrative Expenses
77 s
7 70.250
5 13.750
5 13,750
TMDLCompliance Monitoring Expenses
7777
7 7 Watersneo-wide Nutrient Monitoring Progra7m 7 7 77 0 4.250 5 4.25070 4.250 Lake Elsinore Nutrient MonitoringProgram
7 7
s . 7
5 7.500
$ 77.500
Canyon Lake Nutrient Monitoring Program
7 7‘7
s 7-7 7s77 7
7 8,82470 8.0247
Lake Elsinore FrulectAlternatives
77777
777
7 Aeration 5. Desiretinoation System 08M
3 - s
77 7 - s
Fishery Management 08M
77 7
s - 3 - $ - Canyon Lake Project Alternatives 7
777
77 s - $ - $
7 <7
City of Perris __
7 $ 43,130$ 72,100
$ 72,100
Task Force Regulatory/Administrative Expenses
s
77 0.275073 13.750
0 13,750 TMDL Compliance Monitoring Expenses 7 7 7 7 7
7 Watershed-wide Nutrient MonitoringProgram 73 4,250
$ 4.250 Lake Elsinore Nutrient Monitoring Program 7 s - $ 7,500 Canyon Lake Nutrient Monitoring Program
0 A
$ 0,8247 7LakeElsinore Project7Alternatives 7 Aeration 8. Destrati?callon System 08M 7 7 77 7 7 $ - 7 $ 7 S - Fishery Management 08M 33 - $ - $ - Canyon Lake Project Alie7r7natives 77 77 777
$ 30,630
$
7 377.77707 37.777
City of Riverside
$ 17,977
$ 41,079
$ 41,079
Task Force Regulatory/Administrative Expenses
3 8,2508 13,750
$ 13,750
77TMDLCompliance Monitoring Expenses77
77 7
_ Walershed- wide Nutrient M7o7n luringProgram 3 $ 472507$ 4,250 LakeElsmore Nutrient MonitoringProgram
777
$ - 37 7.500
$ 7,500 CanyonL 5 e Nutnent Monitoring Program » 3 9.82475 7 8,824 Lake Elsinore ErojectAlternatives 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Aeration
& DeslraliiicationSystem 0&M
$
a
7 7
r
$ - Fishery Management 08M
77 I
S
»
$ - $
77 - Canyon Lake Project Alternatives
777
7 3 5,477
5 6 755
$
6 755
——-————_—t___,
— ____.
City of SanJacinto 77
7 $ 33,067$ 759,690
$ 59,690
Task Force RegulatorylAdmlnistrative 7Ex7penses
3 5.250
$ 13.750
5 13,750 TMDL Compliance Monitoring Expenses
777
7 Watershed-wide Nutrlent Monitoring Program
77 777 07 47.7505 4.250
S
7 774727507
Lak7eElsinore Nutrient Monitorlng Program
77 7 77777777777
7 t . $
7 500
s
7 500
Canyon Lake Nutrient Monitoring Program
77777
$ - $ 8.824
3 3.824 Lake77E7lsinore Project Alternatives 7
Aeration78. Destrati?cation System 08M
7 7777777
s - ti - S
7 r
Fishery Manage7m3rt7ooM7
7 s - $
»
5 777 - Canyon Lake Project Alternatives 77777 7 7 7777270 56777 707 25 367 s 25 307
18.J.
————.—___—__,
City of Menifee j,,,
, 507,294 S W 80,936 $ 80,936
Task Force RegulatorylAdministrative Expenses l 5 8,250 $ 13.750 $ 13.750 TMDLCompliance Monitoring Expenses
WatershedrwideNument Monitoring Program
7 $ 4.250 $ 4,250 5 4,250
Lake Elsinore Nutrient Monitoring Program 0 » $ 7,500 $ 7,500 7 7Ca7nyon Lake Nutrient MonitoringProgram a - 5 8,824 5 5.324 Lake Elsinore Project Alternatives
'
Aeration & Destraii?cailon System 08M 8 - 3 . 3 -
77 Fishery Management 08M
77 77 77 $ . s . g; .
Canyon Lake Project Alternatives $ 37.794 3 46,612 8; 46,612 -———_—————‘————i
City 0! Wildomar $ 12,500 $ 25,500 $ 25,500
Task Force Regulatory/Administrative Expenses $ 8,250 5 13.750_ $ 13,750 77M7DI: Compliance Monitoring Expenses
Watershed-wideNutrient Monitoring Program 0 4,250 S 4,250 5 4.250 Lake Elsinore Nutrient Monitoring Program i 3 r $ 7,500 $ 7.500 Canyon Lake NutrientMonitoring Program
7 7 7
$ » $ - $ —
Lake Elsinore Project Alternatives
Aeration8xDestraii?cat'lort System 08M 3 - S - $ -
Fishery Management 03M 3 - $ , s ,
Canyon Lake Project Alternatives $ -
,_ §.,
7 H 7; $ -
,.___ l:
Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVMWD) $ 12,500 $ 25,500 $ 25,500 Task Force Regulatory/Administrative Expenses
7 W
, $ 6,250 5 13,750 3 13.750
TMDLCompliance Monitoring Expenses
Watershed-wi 7 I“ Monitoring Program $ 4,250 $ 4.250 5 4,250 Lake Elsmore MonitoringProgram $ — as 7,500 $ 7.500
Canyon Lake Nutrient Monitoring Program $ . $
. s
_
Lake Elsinore Project Alternatives Aeration& DestratinoarionSystem 0&M $ .77 $
.
7 s .
Fishery Management ow ,7, . 7 $
. Ls . s ,
Canyon Lake Project Alternatives 5
. 3. s
_
San Jacinto Agricultural Operators $ 12,500 $ 34,324 $ 34,324 Task Force RagulatorylAdministrative Expenses $
__ 8.250 3 13,750 $ 13,750
TMDL Compliance Monitoring Expenses
Watershed—WideNutrientMonitoring Program 7 $ 4,250 $ 4.250 $ 4.250 Lake Elsinore Nutrient Monitoring Program
7 s77 777 7777-7 35 7,500 $ 7.500
Canyon Lake Nutrient'Monitoring Program
7 $ » L35 8.824 $ 8,824
Lake Elsinore Project Alterna es
Aeration & Destrati?cation System 0&M $ - $ - $ -
Fishery Management 0&M $ - S - $
"7
A
Canyon Lake Project Alternatives 3
, $ - S 7-77
f——————— ———l
San Jacinto Dairy & CAFO Operators $ 12,500 5 34,324 $ 34,324 , Task Force RegulatoryIAdministrative Expenses $ 8,250 $ 13,750 3 13.750 TMPLCompliance MonitoringExpenses ,
77 Watershedrwrae Nutrient MonitoringF7-7ro79r7am 7 7 77 7 7' 7 7 i s
7 4.250 $ 4.25703 4250
Lake Elsinore Nutrient MonitoringProgram $ - $ 7,500 $ 7,500 7 Tan7yon7Lake Nutrient Monitoring Program
7777 77 7 777 7 s
77 $7 $77 . W 6,824 737777 0,0247
Lake Elsinore Project Alternatives
7 7
Aeration 8r Destrati?cation System 03M 5 - $ r $ -
Fishery Management 0&M
7 777 7 7 7 $ , $ - 3 '
CanyonLakel’rojsctAlternatives
7 s - $
. S -
>
7, ,7 i
CALTRANS.freeway 3 12,500 $ 34,324 l 3 34,324
Task Force RegulatorylAdmlnistrative Expenses $ 8,250 5 13,750 S 13,750 TMDLCompliance Monitoring Expenses ,
. 7 Watershed-wide Nutrient Monitoring Program 5 4.250 $ 4,250 $ 4,250 Lake Elsinore NutrientMonitoringProgram S - F? 7,500 $ 7,500 Canyon Lake NutrientMonitoring Program 5 - 5 8.824 3: 8.824 Lake Elsinore Project Alternatives Aer7aiion & Destrati?catton System 08M 3 - 5 » s - Fishery Management 08M 5 - 5 , $ »
Canyon Lake Project Alternatives 5 - $ - $ -
18.J.
CA DF&G — San Jacinto Wetlands
7 7§77 12,500 $ 34,324 $ 34,324
Task Force Regulatory/Admjnislr _ 7eExpenses
77 7 7s 8.250 5 13,750 $ 13.750
TMDLEaglianoSMonltorino Expenses
77 7
777
7‘7
Watershedawide Nutrient Monitoring Program
7 777 7 7 $ 4,250 0
7 4,250 3; 4,250 Lake Elsinore Nutrient Monitoring Program 77 77 7 7 7
$
7 - 0 7.5007$ 7,500
canyonLake Nutrient Monitoring Program
7 7 7
7 7 737 _7—_ i 5.82373; 8,824 Lake Elsinore Project Alternatives 7 7 Aeration & Destiati?cation System 0&M $ - S
-7 $ - _ Fishery Management 00M 3 . $ — o .
Canyon Lake Project Alternatives
7 77 7777 8 _
- 5 - s —
—————————_ t—J ——
Eastern Municipal Water District
7 7 77 $ 7712,50!) $ 25,500 $ 25,500
Task Force RegulatorylAdministrageExpenses
7 $ 8,250 0 13.750 o 13.7507
TMDL Compliance Monitoring Expenses
7 Watershed-wide Nutrient Monitoring Program __ 5 4,250 $ 7 4,250 $ 747%
Lake Elsinore Nutrient Monitoring Program $ ~ $ 7,500 S 7,500 Canyon Lake Nutrient Monitoring Program s
7 , s . Y7 .
Lake Elsinore Project Alternatives
7 7
Aeration& Destratltication System 08M 7 s - 5 , 3
~77
Fishery Management 08M 7 7
7 7
7 70 , $ — $777 — Canyon Lake Project Alternatives
7 S
77 - S
77 .
‘ S - ——————_.—____L— __ i___
March Air Reserve Base Joint Powers Authority
7 $ 12,500 5 34,324 $ 34,324
Task Force Regulatory/Administrative Expengs 3: 8,250 0 13,750 $ 13.750 TMDLCompliance Monitoring Expenses
7 7
77 Watersneti-w?e NutrientMonitor-mo Program
7'
$ 4,250 i 4.250 ? 4250 Lake Elsinore Nutrient Monitoring Program 77 s - s
777 7,500 3 7,500
Canyon Lake NutrientilionitorinEProgram 7 777777
i $ - $ 8.824 $ 8,824 Lake Elsinore Project Alternatives 7 Aeration l; Destratmcation System 0w
7 7 ‘75 . s - s
7 -
Fishery Management 03M
‘ $ - S . S :7
Canyon Lake Project Alternatives
7 7 7 77 i
- $777 , 7s_ .
i
i
7,,
.7 a". a, W, 1
US lr Force (March Air Reserve Base) $ 12,500 $ 34,324 $ 34.324 Task Force RegulatorylAdministxativE Expenses 5 8,250775 13,750 $ _
13.750 TMDL Compliance Monitoring Expenses
7 7 77' 7 7 7 77 7 77 77
7 Watershed-wide Nutrient Monitoring Program $ 4.25070 4.250 5 47,5 Lake Elsinore Nutrient Monitoring Program 3 - 5 7.50077s777 7 7,500 Canyon Lake Nutrient Monitoring Program
7 s - $ 8,824 S 0.824
Lake Elsinore Project Alternatives
7 7777
Aeration & Destratincalion System 0&M
7777 77 7 5 . $ - $ »
Fishery Management cm s
7 » s - s -
77 Canyon Lake Project Alternatives
77 7 7$ , 7$7 - 5
-77
Total: $ 580,000 $ 1,067,000 $ 1,067,000
18.J.
DRAFT FY 2013-14 Budget: Lake Elsinore & Canyon Lake TMDLTask Force . Bud et Bud et Bud et Summary Task Force ExpendItures 201514 201493152M5?” Part A: Task Force RegulatorylAdmlnistrative Budget
>>>>> 7777777 77 7 TaskForce Administration
7 777 3 50,000 $ 503003 50,0007 TaskForceAdministrator (LESJWA)7 7 77777 7 7 77 7’ 7 7 77
Annual WaterQualityReporting and DatabaseManagement7
7 7 7 77 7 7
7 7 AmJnEmE?Aggegient
77 777 7 777 7 7 77777 777 77
77 7
Grant Preparation
_
77 7 7 7 7 7 L
7 J'MDLCompliance Expert
77 77 77_
777 5 50,000 5 50,000 73777 00,000 Risk Sciences
7 7
7 Update of Watershed andIn Lake NutrientModeis77 7 77 77 77 _7 5 ~ 5 100,000 $ 100.000 Watershed Modeling
77777
7 _
7 7 7 7770 100.000 0
7 100,097
in-lake Modeling
7 7
7 77 7 7 7 ReviewandRevision of Water Quality Objectives 7 7
7 t 50,00077577 25,000 0 275300
DO Target Adjustment
777 7
7777 77 7 _ 7 7 _ 77 77 777 7 $ 25,900 $ 25,0@
7Contingency
7 777 0 15,000 5 50,000 5 50,000
TMDLTask Force Regulatow/AdmlnistrativeBudget 0 165,000 $ 275,000 m Part B: TMDLimplementation Project Budget
TMDLCompliance Monitoring
Watershed-wide Nutrient Monitoring Ergqcam, $7 05,000 0 as 000 7 37 05,000 7 Watershed-wideNutrient Monitoring&7ReportPrep7aration (WestonSolu7tions)77 77 s 7 70,000 0 70,0007
Wet Year Watershed- wide Monitoring(weather dependant)(RCFC&WCD)7 7 7 s - 7s 77 _ 7-
Lab Anaiysis Watershed-wide Monitg?rlg(RCFC&WC70)
7 7 _777 1 s 15 000 $
7 15,000
Stream gauge 0&M (RCFC8IWCD)
777 7 7 7s 77
A a;
7 77
- 7Lake
77 Elsinore Nutrient Monitoring Program 3 - s 150, 000 ' s 150.000 Lake ElsinoreNutrientMonitoring & Lat: Ana7lys7is (EVMWD7)77 777 a; 7 7 s _ _,1750700070
7' 150.0007 7CanyonLake Nutrient Monito_ring_Program7
7 77 s -
7 _ 150,000775 150,000 Canyon7Lake Nutrient Monit70ring& Lab Analysrs(7EVMWD)7 7 7 7 7 7 S - $ 150,000 0 1500070 Lake Elsinore Project Alternatives 777 7
77 77 Aeration_&De7stratification System 0&M (to be handled by separate agreement) 7 7 $7 - s
77 - s
7 - MM 77
777 7 _ s - s
7 -
7 70 Pollutant T7ra7dingAdministration 7(73%7 0f 0&M76075717757 77 7 7 5 777-77 7 77__ - S
7 _7
, ,
, ,7
7 W" 5 :i ,L, ‘ 3 : ,
_777
77 _ 3 - $ ,
7 77
- Pollutant TradingiAdministration (73%7 of7O&7lVl Costs) 0 - $ - 7 7
- 7Canyon7LakeProject Alternatives 77 7 7 7 77 77 7737 55070000 7 407,000 7377 Emmi
Chemical Additions AlumDosing(27a7pp|icat7io7ns annually)7 7 7 7 7077777270000$7 270,000 $ 7 270,000 7 Consulti7n7g Support
77 77
77" 7 0 30.00070 77— S
77 7
08M Agreement 7 7
7 s -
7 73 7
» $ -
7 Detailed_De7sign 7
7777777 777777777
7 7 7 70777 7
- 0
7 - $
Construction
7 7 77 7s » 707 -
7 7577 7
»
7 E?ective?engpnitEirTg 7 7 77 7
7 77 7 7 7 3 100,000 0 100,000 ’ 0&M
’
" '
’ s
'““
- s - s - Administration (170%of budgetedexpenses)77777777 77 77 77—77777 77 s
7 70 37,000 L77 377730077
Trading Administration 3% of 0&M Costs77) S $
, $ » TMDLTask Force Implementation Budget 5 415,000 $ 792,000 $ 792,000 TMDLTask Force Budget : S 580,000 3 1,067,000 $ 1,067,000
18.J.
- Bud at Bud et Bud et Task Force Agency Contributions Summary 201353142014531520159.16 Task Force Agency Allocation _ Total Total Total
M54 Co-Permittees (Total) 5 480,000J5 010.0591 5 010.059 Riverside County 0 73,314 5 109,327 3 109.327
City of Beaumont 0 19,706 $ 43,211 $ 43211
Cityof Canyon Lake 5 15.774 3 42,062 $ 42,062
City of Hemet 3 54,425 35 86.035 3 86.035
City of Lake Elsinore 3 34,784 $ 61.800 , 5 61,808
Cityof Moreno Valley $ 109.525 $ 153,988 ‘ s 153.988
City of Murrieta $ 12.500 0 34.324 55 34.32:]
1 City of Penis
77 f
3 43,130 3 72.100 2; 72,100
Cityof Riverside 0 17,977 5 41,079 $ 41.079
Cityof San Jacinto 5 33,067 5 59,690 0 59,690
7 City of Menifee 7 7 7
0 50,294 0 80,900 0
— 80,936
City of Wildomar 0 , 12,500 $ 25.500 Ls 25.500
Elsinore Valley Muni jpal Water District (EVMWD) 5 12,500 5 25,500 3 25,500 San Jacinto Agricultural Operators 5 12,500 5 34,324 3 34,324 San Jacintg Daily & CAFO Operators 3 12.50045 34,324 ,5 7 34,324 CALTRANS- freeway 3 12,500 3 34,324 5 34,324
CA DF&G - San Jacinto Wetlands 5 12,500 3 34,324 5 34,324 Eastern Municipal Water District 3 12,500 5 25,500 3 25,500 March Air Reserve Base Joint Powers Authority l 5 12,500 i 5 34,324 .s 34,324 US Air Force March Air Reserve Base s 12,500 E3 34.324 3 34.324! Total Funding Required $ 580,000 $ 1,067,000 $ 1,067,000 . Bud at Bud et Bud e! Prop 84 Round 2 lRWM Funding 201;“ 201435 # 2015316 CanyonLake HybridTreatment Erocess- Phase 1 s - 5 250,000 5 250 00 Total Grant Funding S - $ 250,000 5 250,000
Notes:
Task Force Administration
a. Organize and facilitate TMDLTASK FORCE and TAG meetings, b. Perform secretarial, clerical and administrative services, including providing meeting summaries t0 TMDLTASK FORCE members.
C. Manage TMDLTASK FORCE lunds and prepare annual reports at TMDLTASK FORCE assets and expenditures, (1, Serve as the contracting party. for the bene?t of the TMDLTASKFORCE.forcontracts with all consultants, contractors. Vendors and other entities, e. Seek (unding grants to assist with achieving goals and obiectivesoftne TMDLTASK FORCE. 1 Coordinate withother agencies and organizations as necessary to facilitate TMDLTASK FORCE work, Q.Administerthe preparation at quarterly and annual reports, as required by the TMDLImplementation Plan, and submit them as required by the TMDLImplementation Plan on behalt of the TMDLTASK FORCE.
it. Possible administrator of future pollutant trading (water quality trading) agreements, TMDL Compliance Expert
a, Support Task Force Agency as a Regulatory Shrateglst and Conipliance Expert , b, Devetop implementation strategy to address TMDLcompliance with nutrient targets
0. Plan and prepare Basin Plan Amendment for TMDL
d. Sub-contrast out pollutant trading agreement preparation by consultant
18.J.
IN WITNESSWHEREOF, the PARTIEShereto have executed this Agreement on the dates shown adjacent their respective signatures. This Agreement becomes effective as of the date of the latest signature page received.
LAKEELSINOREAND SAN JACINTOWATERSHEDSAUTHORITY
BY
/ MM 71%
TITLE LEA-1WA AV‘M‘DF'AR/ AJM‘MUy‘Vrad-Or
DATE 2/27’/‘3
APPROVEDASTO FORM
BY MACK Jame:
Attorney
DATE 2~/7«9/13
APPRO/VEE) As W //?
( /
'
,
4, ,
4‘
“7
BY 44% fem
Attorney
' ‘J
18.J.
Lake Elsinore/Canyon Lake TMDL Task Force Agreement
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
FISH AND GAME
BY
DATE
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
BY
DATE
CITY OF BEAUMONT
BY 11
Mayor 7%
DATE [3 — 4-, ML
CITY OF CANYON LAKE
BY
Mayor
DATE
CITY OF HEMET
BY _ Mayor
DATE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
BY
Mayor
DATE
CITY OF MENIFEE
BY
Mayor
DATE
11 CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
BY
Mayor
DATE:
CITY OF MURRIETA
BY
Mayor
DATE
CITY OF PERRIS
BY
Mayor
DATE
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
BY
Mayor
DATE
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
BY
Mayor
DATE
CITY OF WILDOMAR
BY
Mayor
DATE
18.J.
Lake Elsinore/Canyon Lake TMDL Task Force Agretmcnt
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
FISH AND GAME
BY
DATE
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
BY
DATE
CITY OF BEAUMONT
BY
Mayor
DATE
CITY OF CANYON LAKE
CITY OF HEMET
BY
Mayor
DATE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
BY
Mayor
DATE
CITY OF MENIFEE
BY
Mayor
DATE
11 CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
BY
Mayor
DATE:
CITY OF MURRIETA
BY
Mayor
DATE
CITY OF PERRIS
BY
Mayor
DATE
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
BY
Mayor
DATE
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
BY
Mayor
DATE
CITY OF WILDOMAR
BY
Mayor
DATE
18.J.
Lake ElsinordCanyon Lake TMDL Task Force Agreement
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
FISH AND GAME
BY
DATE
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
BY
DATE
CITY OF BEAUMONT
BY
Mayor
DATE
CITY OF CANYON LAKE
BY
Mayor
DATE
CITY
(y?w35:7
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
BY
Mayor
DATE
CITY OF MENIFEE
BY
Mayor
DATE
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
BY
Mayor
DATE:
CITY OF MURRIETA
BY
Mayor
DATE
CITY OF PERRIS
BY
Mayor
DATE
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
BY
Mayor
DATE
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
BY
Mayor
DATE
CITY OF WILDOMAR
BY
Mayor
DATE
18.J.
Lake EIsinurt/Canyon Lake TMDL Task Forcc Agreement
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
FISH AND GAME
BY
DATE
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
BY
DATE
CITY OF BEAUMONT
BY
Adayor
DATE
CITY OF CANYON LAKE
BY
Mayor
DATE
CITY OF HEMET
BY
Mayor
DATE
CITY OF MENIFEE
BY
Mayor
DATE
11 CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
BY
Mayor
DATE:
CITY OF MURRIETA
BY
Mayor
DATE
CITY OF PERRIS
BY
Mayor
DATE
CITY OF RIVERSlDE
BY
Mayor
DATE
CITY OF SAN JAClNTO
BY
Mayor
DATE
CITY OF WILDOMAR
BY
Mayor
DATE
18.J.
Lake Elsinore/Canyon Lake TMDL Task Farce Agrtemcnl
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
FISH AND GAME
BY
DATE
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
BY
DATE
CITY OF BEAUMONT
BY
Mayor
DATE
CITY OF CANYON LAKE
BY
Mayor
DATE
CITY OF HEMET
BY
Mayor
DATE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
BY
Mayor
DATE
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
BY
Mayor
DATE:
CITY OF MURRIETA
BY
Mayor
DATE
CITY OF PERRIS
BY
Mayor
DATE
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
BY
Mayor
DATE
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
BY
Mayor
DATE
CITY OF WILDOMAR
BY
Mayor
DATE
’1 up
. Fletcher,
18.J.
Laks Elsinore/Canyon Lake TMDL Task Force Agreement
CITY OF MOR O VALLEY WWW YMayor JW
DATE .{WL’L
BY D M WL
DATE q ho‘vn/
APPROVED AS TO FORM
BY
City Attorn
DATE 7/51/2
ll
18.J.
Lake Elsinore/Canyon Lake TMDL Task Force Agreement
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENTOF CITY OF MORENO VALLEY HSHANDGAME BY BY
ndayor
DATE DATE
CALIFORNIADEPARTMENTOF CITY OF MURRIETA
TRANSPORTATION
BY
DATE
CITY OF BEAUMONT CITY OF PERRIS
BY BY
Mayor Mayor
DATE DATE
CITY OF CANYON LAKE CITY OF RIVERSIDE
BY BY
Mayor Mayor
DATE DATE
CITY OF HEMET CITY OF SAN JACINTO
BY BY
hdayor hAayor
DATE DATE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CITY OF WILDOMAR
BY BY
knayor Adayor
DATE DATE
CITY OF MENIFEE
BY
Adayor
DATE
18.J.
Lake Elsinore/Canyon Lake TMDL Task Force Agreement
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
FISH AND GAME
BY
DATE
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
BY
DATE
CITY OF BEAUMONT
BY
Mayor
DATE
CITY OF CANYON LAKE
BY
Mayor
DATE
CITY OF HEMET
BY
Mayor
DATE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
BY
Mayor
DATE
CITY OF MENIFEE
BY
Mayor
DATE
11 CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
BY
Mayor
DATE:
CITY OF MURRIETA
Mayor
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
BY
Mayor
DATE
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
BY
Mayor
DATE
CITY OF WILDOMAR
BY
Mayor
DATE
18.J.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement entitled “AGREEMENT TO FORM THE LAKE ELSINORE AND CANYON LAKE TMDL TASK FORCE”
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
BY
ity
M
Manageé?
DATE July 17, 2013
me st;
Clark
APPROVED AS TO FORM
MQQMW Emma
CERTIFIEDASTOFUNDSAVAllABlLlTY:
L ‘:-"-._.:
§'.,‘251X'1C€Director
18.J.
Lake Elsinore/Canyon Lake TMDL Task Force Agreement
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
FISH AND GAME
BY
DATE
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
BY
DATE
CITY OF BEAUMONT
BY
Mayor
DATE
CITY OF CANYON LAKE
BY
Mayor
DATE
CITY OF HEMET
BY
Mayor
DATE
CITY OF LAKE ELSTNORE
BY
Mayor
DATE;
7777777777 J W
CITY OF MENIFEE
BY
Mayor
DATE
ll
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
BY
Mayor
DATE: _
CITY OF MURRIETA
BY
Mayor
DATE , ,
CITY OF PERRIS
BY
Mayor
DATE
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
BY
Mayor
DATE
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
BY wg?‘ MEyo
DATE 7'S? -/Q _ ._
CITY OF WILDOMAR
BY
Mayor
DATE
18.J.
Lake Elsinore/Canyon Lake TMDL Task Force Agrecmem
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
FISH AND GAME
BY
DATE
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
BY
DATE
CITY OF BEAUMONT
BY
Mayor
DATE
CITY OF CANYON LAKE
BY
Mayor
DATE
CITY OF HEMET
BY
Mayor
DATE
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
BY
Mayor
DATE
CITY OF MENIFEE
BY
Mayor
DATE
l l
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
BY
Mayor
DATE:
CITY OF MURRIETA
BY
Mayor
DATE
CITY OF PERRIS
BY
Mayor
DATE
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
BY
Mayor
DATE
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
BY
Mayor
DATE
CITY OF WILDOMAR
18.J.
Lake Elsinore/Canyon Lake TMDL Task Force Agreement
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
BY
DATE
ELSINORE VALLEY MUNICIPAL
WATER DISTIRCT
BY
DATE
MARCH JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY
BY
DATE
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
BY
DATE
12 US. AIR FORCE
(MARCH AIR RESERVE BASE)
BY
DATE
WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY
AGRICULTURE COALITION
BY
DATE
SANTA ANA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY
CONTROL BOARD
BY
DATE
18.J.
Lake Elsinore/Canyon Lake TMDL Task Force Agreement
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE U.S. AIR FORCE
(MARCH AIR RESERVE BASE)
BY BY
DATE DATE
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY
AGRICULTURE COALITION
BY E BY
DATE ‘ l ' 7 ' I
’p DATE
ELSINORE VALLEY MUNICIPAL SANTA ANA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY
WATER DISTIRCT CONTROL BOARD
BY BY
DATE DATE
MARCH JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY
BY
DATE
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
BY
DATE
12
18.J.
Lake Elsinore/Canyon Lake TMDL Task Force Agrumem
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE U.S. AIR FORCE
(MARCH AIR RESERVE BASE)
BY BY
DATE DATE
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY
AGRIGULTURE COALITION
BY BY
DATE DATE
SANTA ANA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY
CONTROL BOARD
BY
DATE
MARCH JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY
BY
DATE
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
BY
DATE
0
18.J.
Lake Elsinore/Canyon Lake TMDL Task Force Agreement
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
BY
DATE
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
BY
DATE
ELSINORE VALLEY MUNICIPAL
WATER DISTIRCT
BY
DATE
MARCH JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY
t
H
I y‘ ,
/ r mzpb , /
By] MN; 4%:
DATE _7)[j/I[IN
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
BY
DATE
U.S. AIR FORCE
(MARCH AIR RESERVE BASE)
BY
DATE
WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY
AGRIGULTURE COALITION
BY
DATE
SANTA ANA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY
CONTROL BOARD
BY
DATE
18.J.
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 I9
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 148926
RIVERSIDECOUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
RECOMMENDED/F
V OR APPROVAL: y,’ AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
,? , V,
/, /
4 fr _ 3/; :1 " Byén,
WARREN
Axle—”é
D. WILLIAMS
/,Z.,~_..BYMWM MARION
AW
SHLEY, Chairman // General Manager-Chief Engineer Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
Board of Supervisors
‘ /
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
PAMELA J. WALLS, KECIA HARPER-IHEM
Clerkof the Board
/\ By
De uty (
(SEAL)
Agreement to Form the Lake Elsinore
and Canyon Lake TMDL Task Force
9/11/12
KECzblj
18.J.
Lake Elsinore/Canyon Lake TMDL Task F arce Agreement
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
BY
DATE
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
BY
DATE:
ELSINORE VALLEY MUNICIPAL
QUALITY WATER DISTIRCT
BY
DATE:
MARCH JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY
(LESJWA)
BY
DATE:
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
BY
DATE:
12 US. AIR FORCE
(MARCH AIR RESERVE BASE)
BY. S ——6c
SAMUEL C.MAHAR ET,Col, USAFR
Commander, 452d Air Mobility Wing
DATE: 0% 0——
WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY
AGRICULTURE COALITION
BY
DATE:
SANTA ANA REGIONAL WATER
CONTROL BOARD
BY
DATE:
LAKE ELSINORE & SAN JACINTO
WATERSHEDS AUTHORITY
BY
DATE:
18.J.
Lake Elsinore/Canytm Lakc TMDL Task Force Agrncment
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
BY
DATE
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
BY
DATE
ELSINORE VALLEY MUNICIPAL
WATER DISTIRCT
BY
DATE
MARCH JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY
BY
DATE
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
BY
DATE
12 us. AIR FORCE
(MARCH AIR RESERVE BASE)
BY
DATE
WESTERNRIVERS IDE CO
AGRIG ULT 1‘E‘ITY
BY 17/; xCOALI zd?/g
DATE {2 - / 4037);;
SANTA ANA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY
CONTROL BOARD
BY
DATE
18.J.
Lake Elsinore/Canyon Lake TMDL Task Force Agreement
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
BY
DATE
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
BY
DATE
ELSINORE VALLEY MUNICIPAL
WATER DISTIRCT
BY
DATE
MARCH JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY
BY
DATE
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
BY
DATE
12 US. AIR FORCE
(MARCH AIR RESERVE BASE)
BY
DATE
WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY
AGRICULTURE COALITION
BY
DATE
SANTA ANA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY
CONTROL BOARD
BY k 2:1-5222i
DATE—L'?bql—
18.J.
Lake ElsinorejCanyon Lake TMDL Task Force Agreement
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
BY
DATE
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
BY
DATE
ELSINORE VALLEY MUNICIPAL
WATER DISTIRCT
BY
DATE
MARCH JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY
BY
DATE
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
BY
DATE
12 US. AIR FORCE
(MARCH AIR RESERVE BASE)
BY
DATE
WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY
AGRICULTURE COALITION
BY
DATE
SANTA ANA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY
CONTROL BOARD
BY
DATE
LAKE ELSINORE & SAN JACINTO
WATERSHEDS AUTHORITY (LESJWA)
BY 2’Ll/M C” [/15 Aw
DATE 7
' L)3 L“, 3/
18.J.
LECL TMDL Task Force – Amendment 3 to 2012 Agreement
AMENDMENT NO. 3
TO THE
AGREEMENT TO FORM THE
LAKE ELSINORE AND CANYON LAKE
TMDL TASK FORCE
Pursuant to Covenants II, Section 21. of that certain AGREEMENT entitled, “Agreement to Form the Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake TMDL Task Force” (“Task Force Agreement”), dated June 18, 2012; and
Whereas this Task Force Agreement initially had been prepared for a five-year term and subsequently twice extended for additional five-year terms and therefore is set to expire on the date of June 30, 2022.
Therefore, the TASK FORCE AGENCIES as named in the Agreement (Exhibit A), hereby agree to the following changes:
I. Extend the term of the Task Force Agreement to June 30, 2025, and II. Stipulate the option that the Agreement, while still in full force and effect, may be extended an additional two years, to June 30, 2027, by means of Administrative Action by the Task Force Administrator.
Except as otherwise expressly amended herein, all of the terms, conditions, and provisions of the Agreement to Form the Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake TMDL Task Force (Exhibit A) shall continue in full force and effect.
This Amendment No. 3 may be executed in original counterparts, which together shall constitute a single Agreement document.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 3 to the Agreement to Form the Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake TMDL Task Force, on the dates set forth below.
LAKE ELSINORE AND SAN JACINTO WATERSHEDS AUTHORITY (LESJWA) BY _________________________________________________________ Mark Norton, LESJWA Authority Administrator Date
18.J.
3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 3 to the Agreement to Form the Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake TMDL Task Force, on the dates set forth below
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE
By:____________________________________________
Title:_Regional Manager, Inland Deserts Region________
Date:___________________________________________
DocuSign Envelope ID: F95CEF32-4216-4147-8E18-F90E2F7ADE23 9/28/2022
18.J.
2 LECL TMDL Task Force – Amendment 3 to 2012 Agreement
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 3 to the Agreement to Form the Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake TMDL Task Force, on the dates set forth below
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
By:____________________________________________
Jagjiwan Grewal, Chief, Office of Stormwater Program Implementation Date:___________________________________________ 9/2/2022
18.J.
18.J.
5 LECL TMDL Task Force – Amendment 3 to 2012 Agreement
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 3 to the Agreement to Form the Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake TMDL Task Force, on the dates set forth below
CITY OF CANYON LAKE
By:____________________________________________
Chris Mann, City Manager
Date:___________________________________________
APPROVED AS TO FORM
By______________________________________________
Ana V. Sauseda, City Clerk
Date:___________________________________________
DocuSign Envelope ID: BCD62ECF-4E03-448C-A4FE-B44DE19E898F 7/21/2022
7/21/2022
18.J.
6 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 3 to the Agreement to Form the Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake TMDL Task Force, on the dates set forth below
CITY OF HEMET
By:____________________________________________
City Manager
Date:___________________________________________
APPROVED AS TO FORM
By______________________________________________
City Attorney Date
DocuSign Envelope ID: F4EDD9D5-86BD-477F-AA9F-82F8F28E28EA 6/27/2022
6/28/2022
18.J.
7 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 3 to the Agreement to Form the Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake TMDL Task Force, on the dates set forth below
CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
By:____________________________________________
Timothy J. Sheridan, Mayor
Date:___________________________________________
APPROVED AS TO FORM
By______________________________________________
David Mann, City Attorney
Date:___________________________________________
18.J.
8 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 3 to the Agreement to Form the Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake TMDL Task Force, on the dates set forth below
CITY OF MENIFEE
By:____________________________________________
Mayor
Date:___________________________________________
APPROVED AS TO FORM
By______________________________________________
City Attorney Date
DocuSign Envelope ID: 5E951EAE-2845-4E1B-81BA-F62CEC56C9FA By______________________________________________________ Acting City Clerk
June 1, 2022
City Manager _____________
June 1, 2022
Date
June 1, 2022
18.J.
5/4/2022
DocuSign Envelope ID: 81FFD621-9891-4246-8C36-0A134CA008F2 6/28/2022
18.J.
10 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 3 to the Agreement to Form the Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake TMDL Task Force, on the dates set forth below
CITY OF MURRIETA
By: ____________________________________________
Jonathan Ingram, Mayor
Date: __________________________________________
ATTEST:
By: ____________________________________________
Cristal McDonald, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM
By ________________________________________ ____________________ Tiffany Israel, City Attorney Date
DocuSign Envelope ID: CC07A636-268B-413B-A798-E458B55C0211 June 28, 2022
June 29, 2022
18.J.
18.J.
18.J.
13 LECL TMDL Task Force – Amendment 3 to 2012 Agreement IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 3 to the Agreement to Form the Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake TMDL Task Force, on the dates set forth below
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
By:____________________________________________
Robert Johnson, City Manager
Date:___________________________________________
APPROVED AS TO FORM
By______________________________________________
Michael Maurer, City Attorney
Date:___________________________________________
DocuSign Envelope ID: 63E20F87-41B7-457C-A8AE-511260074888 6/30/2022
7/8/2022
18.J.
2 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 3 to the Agreement to Form the Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake TMDL Task Force, on the dates set forth below
CITY OF WILDOMAR
By:____________________________________________
Ben J. Benoit, Mayor
Date:___________________________________________
ATTEST:
By:_____________________________________________
Janet Morales, City Clerk Date
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By______________________________________________
Thomas D. Jex, City Attorney Date
DocuSign Envelope ID: C7E69ABE-AFD9-4F93-AD7F-A1B0AFD2A8B5 10/13/2022
10/13/2022
10/13/2022
18.J.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 3 to the Agreement to Form the Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake TMDL Task Force, on the dates set forth below
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
B Dated JUN 2 92022
ATTEST:KECIA HARPER
Clerk of the Board
Dated JUNt 8202U
(Seal)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
COUNTY COUNSEL
B A*t"* ,hr*',,n Dated /o- /3 -2o 2
Caroline Mofiroy I
Deputy County Counsel
[uN t I20n ll 'l
-15-
18.J.
16 LECL TMDL Task Force – Amendment 3 to 2012 Agreement IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 3 to the Agreement to Form the Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake TMDL Task Force, on the dates set forth below
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
By:____________________________________________
Joe Mouawad, P.E., General Manager
Date:___________________________________________
DocuSign Envelope ID: 990DCD34-C33B-4C88-B535-5691A67AA278 6/28/2022
18.J.
17 LECL TMDL Task Force – Amendment 3 to 2012 Agreement IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 3 to the Agreement to Form the Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake TMDL Task Force, on the dates set forth below
ELSINORE VALLEY MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
BY _________________________________________________________ Greg Thomas, General Manager Date
DocuSign Envelope ID: BDF2C903-0710-4E25-89EA-5A4026AFCDB5 6/27/2022
18.J.
18 LECL TMDL Task Force – Amendment 3 to 2012 Agreement IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 3 to the Agreement to Form the Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake TMDL Task Force, on the dates set forth below
MARCH JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY
By:____________________________________________
Grace I. Martin, DPPD
Executive Director
Date: __________________________________________
Attest:
By:____________________________________________
Cindy Camargo, Clerk
Approved by March JPC 052522
Date: __________________________________________
Approved as to form:
By:____________________________________________
Thomas A. Rice
Legal Council
Date: __________________________________________
DocuSign Envelope ID: 1E7BA6CD-90C3-4715-BBDB-EA3D4EDD8B6F 6/27/2022
6/29/2022
6/29/2022
18.J.
244004
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 3 to the Agreement to Form the Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake TMDL Task Force, on the dates set forth below.
RECO ED
By
E. UHLEY
Manager-Chief Engineer
APPROVED AS TO FORM
COLINTY COUNSEL
By f,.
S M. GIINZEL
Deputy County Counsel
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROLAND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT By J.
SPIEGEL, Chair
Riverside County Flood Control and WaterConservation District Board of Supervisors ATTEST:
KECIA HARPER
Clerk of the Board
By
(sEAL)
AL
J
JUN 2 82022 t,l .l -19-
18.J.
22 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 3 to the Agreement to Form the Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake TMDL Task Force, on the dates set forth below
SANTA ANA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD
Jayne Joy, P.E.
Executive Officer
Date:___________________________________________
DocuSign Envelope ID: F33EF231-F98F-465F-8835-046B56EEB194 10/3/2022
18.J.
18.J.
21 LECL TMDL Task Force – Amendment 3 to 2012 Agreement IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 3 to the Agreement to Form the Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake TMDL Task Force, on the dates set forth below
WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY AGRICULTURE COALITION
On behalf of the participating Dairy Operators and participating Agriculture Operators in the San Jacinto River Basin
By:____________________________________________
Bruce Scott, Chairman
Date:___________________________________________
DocuSign Envelope ID: ED042318-490F-4824-A545-D68F783715FA 6/28/2022
18.J.
City of Hemet
City Council Meeting
STAFF REPORT
Meeting: City Council Meeting - Sep 08 2026
Department: Police Department
Submitted by: Noah Rau, Interim City Manager
Josiah Douglas, Lieutenant;
☐ Receive and File ☒ Consent Calendar ☐ Business Item ☐ Public Hearing TITLE:
A Resolution of the City Council Approving the Purchase of Eight (8) Axon Fleet In-Car Camera Systems and Twelve (12) Axon Body 4 Flex POV Systems from Axon Enterprises, Inc.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
It is respectfully recommended that the City Council adopt the following resolution (Attachment No. 1):
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-152 – A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HEMET, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THAT AXON ENTERPRISES, INC. IS A SOLE SOURCE FOR THE PURCHASE OF EIGHT (8) AXON FLEET 3 IN-CAR CAMERA SYSTEMS AND TWELVE (12) AXON BODY 4 FLEX POV SYSTEMS, APPROVING THE PURCHASE FOR A TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $165,635.01, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER
TO EXECUTE ALL NECESSARY AGREEMENTS AND PURCHASE ORDERS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Staff recommends the purchase of eight additional Axon Fleet 3 in-car camera systems to equip eight new Police Department vehicles being added to the City’s fleet and twelve Axon body 4 Flex POV systems for use by the Police Department’s Special Operations Unit (SOU). The additional equipment will expand the Department's existing Axon camera system while maintaining compatibility and consistency with the technology currently deployed throughout the Police Department. Because the proposed equipment must integrate with the City's existing Axon equipment, software, digital evidence management system, and related infrastructure, Axon Enterprises, Inc. is the only reasonable and practicable source for the proposed equipment under the City's sole-source procurement provisions.
SB 1439 / LEVINE ACT: GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 84308 APPLICABILITY:
This agenda item may involve a contract, franchise, license, permit, land use approval, or other discretionary entitlement for use subject to Government Code section 84308. Councilmembers should review their campaign contribution records to determine whether they have received campaign contributions totaling more than $500 within the preceding 12 months from any party,
18.K.
participant, or other person whose contribution may be attributable under the Levine Act and FPPC regulations. If applicable, Councilmembers must disclose the contribution on the record and determine whether recusal or other compliance action is required. Applicants, contractors, and other parties or participants are also reminded of their disclosure obligations under Government Code section 84308 and applicable FPPC regulations.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
In January 2025, the City Council approved a ten-year agreement with Axon Enterprises, Inc. for the provision of advanced law enforcement technologies. The agreement consolidated several existing Axon products and expanded the Department’s technology platform to include Taser 10 energy weapons, Axon Body 4 body-worn cameras, Fleet 3 in-car camera systems, virtual reality training equipment, software licensing, Axon Draft One, and related services.
As part of that agreement, the Police Department began deploying Axon Fleet 3 in-car camera systems throughout its vehicle fleet. Fleet 3 provides front facing and rear compartment video capabilities and integrates with the Departments existing Axon body worn camera and digital evidence systems. Standardizing these systems throughout the department allows video evidence from multiple sources to be managed within the same Axon platform.
The Police Department is currently in the process of adding eight vehicles to its fleet that were not included in the original Axon Fleet 3 deployment. Four of those vehicles are 2026 Ford F-150 Police Responders for the Department’s AERO Team that were previously approved by the City Council through Resolution No. 2025-177 (Attachment No. 4). The purchase included the vehicles, police equipment up-fitting, and vehicle branding.
A separate staff report is being prepared under Staff Report No. 26-298, for the purchase of an additional four Police Department vehicles. That item is anticipated to be presented to the City Council on the same agenda as this request. If approved, those four vehicles, combined with the four previously approved AERO vehicles, will require eight additional Fleet 3 systems to maintain consistency with the remainder of the Police Department’s fleet.
The Department is also requesting twelve Axon Body 4 Flex POV systems for use by members of the Police Department’s Special Operations Unit (SOU). The Flex POV system allows the camera to be mounted separately from the main body-worn camera configuration, providing SOU personnel with a mounting option better suited for specialized tactical equipment and operations.
Axon Enterprises Inc. has provided Quote No. Q-898704-005 for the additional equipment (Attachment No. 2). The quote includes eight Fleet 3 Basic + TAP systems and twelve Axon Body Flex 4 POV hardware and TAP bundles. The total contract value, including estimated tax, is $165,635.01.
DISCUSSION:
The police Department has standardized its body-worn and in-car camera technology around the Axon platform. Expanding the existing Fleet 3 systems for the eight additional vehicles will ensure the new units are equipped consistently with the Department’s existing fleet.
In-car camera systems provide an additional perspective during traffic stops, vehicle pursuits, enforcement contacts, and other law enforcement activities. These recordings supplement bodyPage 2 of 26
18.K.
worn camera footage and provide additional documentation that can be used for criminal investigations, administrative reviews, training, and the defense of civil liability claims.
The proposed Fleet 3 systems include two-camera kits, Axon Signal Vehicle, Fleet vehicle license, unlimited camera storage, installation, extended warranties, and Technology Assurance Plan (TAP) equipment refreshes. The quote provides for eight Fleet 3 systems and associated services throughout the remaining term of the Department’s existing Axon technology agreement.
The twelve Flex POV systems will provide SOU personnel with additional flexibility in the placement of body-worn cameras when wearing tactical equipment. SOU personnel routinely operate with specialized equipment and load-bearing systems that differ from standard patrol uniforms. The Flex POV configurations separates the camera module from the primary mounting location and allows the camera to be positioned on tactical equipment while remaining integrated with the Department’s existing Axon body 4 platform.
Maintaining the same Axon platform for these additional systems avoids introducing separate camera hardware, software, evidence-storage systems, and training requirements. It also allows the Department to continue utilizing its existing Axon digital evidence infrastructure and established equipment standards.
The Axon quote provides for 102-month term beginning October 1, 2026, and ending March 31, 2035, aligning the additional equipment with the remaining term of the Department’s existing Axon program.
The contract value is $165,635.01, including estimated taxes, with payments distributed over the remaining contract period.
Approval of this purchase will ensure the eight additional Police Department vehicles are equipped with the same in-car camera technology currently deployed throughout the fleet and will provide SOU personnel with camera equipment designed to better accommodate specialized tactical operations.
Pursuant to the City of Hemet Municipal Code, procurement may be made without a competitive procurement process when there is only one reasonable and practicable source for the required goods or services due to, among other factors, compatibility with existing City programs, equipment, or systems.
The proposed purchase qualifies as a sole-source procurement because the Police Department has standardized its in-car camera, body-worn camera, and digital evidence management systems on the Axon platform under the City's existing agreement with Axon Enterprises, Inc. The proposed Axon Fleet 3 and Axon Body 4 Flex systems are specifically intended to integrate with the Department's existing Axon equipment, software, digital evidence management system, storage, and related services.
Purchasing comparable equipment from another manufacturer would require the City to introduce a separate camera, software, evidence-storage, and technology platform and would not provide compatibility with the City's existing Axon system. Accordingly, Axon Enterprises, Inc. is the only reasonable and practicable source for the proposed equipment based on compatibility with the City's existing equipment and systems.
The Purchasing Officer has determined that the proposed purchase meets the City's sole-source procurement requirements and recommends approval of the purchase from Axon Enterprises, Inc.
18.K.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION:
On January 14, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2025-010 (Attachment No. 3), approving a ten-year agreement with Axon Enterprises Inc. for advanced law enforcement technologies, including Taser 10 energy weapons, Axon Body 4 body-worn cameras, Fleet 3 in-car camera systems, virtual reality training equipment, software license, and related services.
On December 9, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2025-177, approving the purchase of four 2026 Ford F-150 Police Responders for the Hemet Police Department’s AERO Team, including police equipment up-fitting and vehicle branding.
STRATEGIC PLAN INTEGRATION:
GOAL ONE: QUALITY OF LIFE:
To ensure that Hemet is safe, clean, attractive and comfortable for all who live, work, and visit.
Objective 3: Increase Public Safety visibility and response.
GOAL THREE: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
To connect and participate in a constant dialogue between members of the community, City staff, and elected officials to promote togetherness and positivity.
Objective 2: Increase transparency for the public.
GOAL FIVE: ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS
To identify the work needed inside the City organization to effectively provide services to the community and ensure financial stability.
Objective 1: Operate in a financially sustainable manner.
Objective 2: Evaluate existing practices to ensure continuity with industry best practices.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The total contract value for the purchase of eight Axon Fleet 3 in-car camera systems and twelve Axon Body 4 Flex POV systems is $165,635.01, including estimated taxes.
The Fleet 3 systems account for $150,761.55 of the total contract value, while the twelve Flex POV systems account for $14,873.46.
The agreement is structured over a 102-month term beginning October 1, 2026, and ending March 31, 2035. The current payment schedule consists of annual payments of approximately $18,403.88 with the final scheduled payment of $18,403.97.
Funding for this purchase has been included in the Police Department’s Fiscal Year 2026/27 adopted budget and is available in Account No. 110-09-3013-52400. No supplemental appropriation is required.
Future annual payments associated with the agreement will be incorporated into the Police Department’s operating budget for the applicable fiscal years.
18.K.
ALTERNATIVE(S):
1. Do not approve the purchase of the additional Axon Fleet 3 and Flex POV systems. This would result in the eight new Police Department vehicles being placed into service without the in-car camera systems currently utilized throughout the Department’s fleet and would prevent the SOU Team from receiving the proposed Flex POV equipment.
2. Direct staff to evaluate alternative camera systems. This would introduce equipment outside of the Department’s existing Axon platform and could require separate software, digital evidence storage, training, maintenance, and support.
3. Provide alternative direction to the City Manager.
ATTACHMENT(S):
Attachment No. 1 - Reso. No. 2026-152
Attachment No. 2 - Hemet Police Department - CA_Q-898704 (4) Attachment No. 3 - RESO_2025-010_Awarding a 10 Year Agreement to AXON Enterprises Inc. for the Provisions of Advanced Law Enforcement
Attachment No. 4 - RESO_2025-177_Approving the Amendment to Master Equity Lease Agreement with Enterprise Fleet Management Utilizing the Sourcewell Master Vehicle Contract 030122-EF
18.K.
CITY OF HEMET RESOLUTION NO. 2026-152 1
11111
22222
33333
44444
55555
66666
77777
88888
99999
1010101010
1111111111
1212121212
1313131313
1414141414
1515151515
1616161616
1717171717
1818181818
1919191919
2020202020
2121212121
2222222222
2323232323
2424242424
2525252525
2626262626
2727272727
2828282828
CITY OF HEMET
HEMET, CALIFORNIA
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-152
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF HEMET, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE PURCHASE
OF EIGHT (8) AXON FLEET 3 IN-CAR CAMERA
SYSTEMS AND TWELVE (12) AXON BODY 4 FLEX POV
SYSTEMS FROM AXON ENTERPRISES, INC. FOR A
TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED
$165,635.01 AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER
TO EXECUTE ALL NECESSARY AGREEMENTS AND
PURCHASE ORDERS
The City Council of the City of Hemet, California (hereafter referred to as the “City Council”) does resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, the Hemet Police Department utilizes Axon Enterprises, Inc. technology, including body-worn cameras, Fleet 3 in-car camera systems, digital evidence management, and related equipment and services; and WHEREAS, on January 14, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2025- 010, approving a ten-year agreement with Axon Enterprises, Inc. for advanced law enforcement technologies, including Fleet 3 in-car camera systems and Axon Body 4 body-worn cameras; and
WHEREAS, the Police Department has standardized its body-worn and in-car camera technology around the Axon platform to provide consistency in equipment, digital evidence management, training, maintenance, and support; and
18.K.
CITY OF HEMET RESOLUTION NO. 2026-152 2
11111
22222
33333
44444
55555
66666
77777
88888
99999
1010101010
1111111111
1212121212
1313131313
1414141414
1515151515
1616161616
1717171717
1818181818
1919191919
2020202020
2121212121
2222222222
2323232323
2424242424
2525252525
2626262626
2727272727
2828282828
WHEREAS, the Police Department is adding eight vehicles to its fleet that were not included in the original Axon Fleet 3 deployment and require in-car camera systems consistent with those currently deployed throughout the Department; and WHEREAS, four of these vehicles, consisting of 2026 Ford F-150 Police Responders for the Police Department’s AERO Team, were previously approved by the City Council through Resolution No. 2025-177; and
WHEREAS, the Police Department also has a need for twelve Axon Body 4 Flex POV systems for use by members of the Special Operations Unit (SOU), which provide a camera configuration better suited for specialized tactical equipment and operations; and
WHEREAS, the Axon Fleet 3 in-car camera systems provide additional video documentation during traffic stops, vehicle pursuits, enforcement contacts, and other law enforcement activities and supplement the Department’s existing body-worn camera footage; and
WHEREAS, the Axon Body 4 Flex POV systems allow SOU personnel to position cameras on specialized tactical equipment while remaining integrated with the Department’s existing Axon Body 4 platform and digital evidence system; and WHEREAS, Axon Enterprises, Inc. has provided Quote No. Q-898704-005 for eight Fleet 3 Basic + TAP systems and twelve Axon Body 4 Flex POV hardware and TAP bundles for a total contract amount of $165,635.01, including estimated taxes; and WHEREAS, the proposed equipment and associated services will be provided over a 102-month term beginning October 1, 2026, and ending March 31, 2035, aligning
18.K.
CITY OF HEMET RESOLUTION NO. 2026-152 3
11111
22222
33333
44444
55555
66666
77777
88888
99999
1010101010
1111111111
1212121212
1313131313
1414141414
1515151515
1616161616
1717171717
1818181818
1919191919
2020202020
2121212121
2222222222
2323232323
2424242424
2525252525
2626262626
2727272727
2828282828
the additional equipment with the remaining term of the Police Department’s existing Axon technology program; and
WHEREAS, funding for this purchase has been included in the Police Department’s Fiscal Year 2026/27 adopted budget and is available in Account No. 110- 09-3013-52400, and no supplemental appropriation is required; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the purchase of the additional Axon Fleet 3 and Body 4 Flex POV systems will maintain consistency within the Police Department’s existing camera and digital evidence platform and support transparency, evidence collection, operational effectiveness, and officer and public safety.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HEMET FINDS, DETERMINES, ORDERS AND RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The recitals set forth above are hereby adopted as findings in support of this Resolution.
SECTION 2. Authorize the City Manager to purchase eight (8) Axon Fleet 3 incar camera systems and twelve (12) Axon Body 4 Flex POV systems from Axon Enterprises, Inc., pursuant to Quote No. Q-898704-005, for a total contract amount not to exceed $165,635.01.
SECTION 3. Funding for this purchase has been included in the Hemet Police Department’s Fiscal Year 2026/27 adopted budget and is available in Account No. 110- 09-3013-52400. No supplemental appropriation is required.
SECTION 4. Authorize the City Manager to execute all necessary agreements, purchase orders, and related documents and to take all administrative actions
18.K.
CITY OF HEMET RESOLUTION NO. 2026-152 4
11111
22222
33333
44444
55555
66666
77777
88888
99999
1010101010
1111111111
1212121212
1313131313
1414141414
1515151515
1616161616
1717171717
1818181818
1919191919
2020202020
2121212121
2222222222
2323232323
2424242424
2525252525
2626262626
2727272727
2828282828
necessary to complete the purchase in accordance with City purchasing policies and procedures.
SECTION 5. This Resolution shall become effective upon adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of September, 2026. ___________________________
Linda Krupa, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
________________________ __________________________
Steven Graham Pacifico, City Attorney Rosalia A. Butler, MMC, City Clerk
18.K.
CITY OF HEMET RESOLUTION NO. 2026-152 5
11111
22222
33333
44444
55555
66666
77777
88888
99999
1010101010
1111111111
1212121212
1313131313
1414141414
1515151515
1616161616
1717171717
1818181818
1919191919
2020202020
2121212121
2222222222
2323232323
2424242424
2525252525
2626262626
2727272727
2828282828
State of California )
County of Riverside )
City of Hemet )
I, Rosalia A. Butler, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Hemet, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted by the Hemet City Council on the 8th day of September, 2026, and was passed by the following vote:
AYES: Council Members:
NOES: Council Members:
ABSTAIN: Council Members:
ABSENT: Council Members:
_____________________________
Rosalia A. Butler, MMC, City Clerk
18.K.
Axon Enterprise, Inc.
17800 N 85th St, Scottsdale, Arizona 85255, United States VAT: 86-0741227
Domestic: (800) 978-2737 | International: +1 800.978.2737 Q-898704-005 Acct: 149220
Issued Aug 19, 2026
Expires Sep 30, 2026
Payment Terms N30
Mode of Delivery AUTO-GND
Hemet Police Department - CA Currency: USD
CUSTOMER DETAILS
SHIP TO
Hemet Police Department - CA
450 E Latham Ave
Hemet, CA
92543-4224
USA
BILL TO
Hemet Police Department - CA
450 E Latham Ave
Hemet, CA
92543-4224
USA
SALES REPRESENTATIVE
David Gollobit
Phone: (480) 905-2060
Email: [email protected]
PRIMARY CONTACT
Cheyne Nicot
Phone: (951) 663-6001
Email: [email protected]
QUOTE SUMMARY
Program Length 102 Months
Contract Start Oct 1, 2026
Contract End Mar 31, 2035
TOTAL CONTRACT
Net Total $158,232.24
Est. Tax $7,402.77
Total Contract Value $165,635.01
DISCOUNT SUMMARY
List Price $187,690.60
Total Savings $29,458.36
Avg. Savings / Year $3,465.69
PAYMENT SUMMARY
DATE SUBTOTAL EST. TAX TOTAL
Sep 1, 2026 $17,581.36 $822.52 $18,403.88
Mar 1, 2027 $17,581.36 $822.52 $18,403.88
Mar 1, 2028 $17,581.36 $822.52 $18,403.88
Mar 1, 2029 $17,581.36 $822.52 $18,403.88
Mar 1, 2030 $17,581.36 $822.52 $18,403.88
Mar 1, 2031 $17,581.36 $822.52 $18,403.88
Mar 1, 2032 $17,581.36 $822.52 $18,403.88
Mar 1, 2033 $17,581.36 $822.52 $18,403.88
Mar 1, 2034 $17,581.36 $822.61 $18,403.97
Total $158,232.24 $7,402.77 $165,635.01
Axon Enterprise, Inc. Doc ID: 40ba0d6373bf Tax estimates are approximate and subject to change at time of invoicing.
Q-898704-005 • Page 1 of 4
18.K.
Hemet Police Department - CA Q-898704-005 Generated Aug 19, 2026
SUMMARY PRICING FOR TERM
BODY WORN CAMERA
ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY TERM UNBUNDLEDLIST PRICE NET PRICE SUBTOTAL EST. TAX TOTAL H00004
Axon Body 4 Flex POV Hardware Bundle
12 102
(10/2026) — $299.00 $299.00 $3,588.00 $313.95 $3,901.95 T00001
Axon Body 4 Flex POV TAP Bundle
12 102
(10/2026) $3.29 $3.29 $8.35 $10,220.40 $751.11 $10,971.51 Body Worn Camera Total $13,808.40 $1,065.06 $14,873.46
FLEET
ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY TERM UNBUNDLEDLIST PRICE NET PRICE SUBTOTAL EST. TAX TOTAL Fleet3B+TAP10Yr
Fleet 3 Basic + TAP 10 Year
8 102
(10/2026) $220.69 $220.68 $176.99 $144,423.84 $6,337.71 $150,761.55 Fleet Total $144,423.84 $6,337.71 $150,761.55
SUBTOTAL EST. TAX TOTAL
Total $158,232.24 $7,402.77 $165,635.01
Axon Enterprise, Inc. Doc ID: 40ba0d6373bf Tax estimates are approximate and subject to change at time of invoicing.
Q-898704-005 • Page 2 of 4
18.K.
Hemet Police Department - CA Q-898704-005 Generated Aug 19, 2026
DELIVERY SCHEDULE
ESTIMATED SHIPPING DATE: Sep 1, 2026
Shipping Location: 450 E Latham Ave, Hemet, CA, 92543-4224, USA
HARDWARE QTY
Axon Body 4 - C-Clip - POV 12
Axon Body 4 - Flex POV Module 12
Axon Body 4 - Flex POV Module Cable 48 in 12
Axon Body 4 - Mount - POV Picatinny Rail Mount 14
Axon Fleet - Ericsson R980-5GD-A+5Yr Netcloud 8
Axon Fleet - Taoglas Ant - 7-in-1 4Cell 2WIFI 1GNSS Int 8 Axon Fleet 3 - Standard 2 Camera Kit 8
Axon Signal Vehicle 8
SERVICES QTY
Axon Fleet 3 - Deployment Per Vehicle - Not Oversized 8 Axon Fleet 3 - Installation - Upgrade (Per Vehicle) 8
Axon Fleet 3 - SIM Insertion - VZW 4FF 8
WARRANTIES QTY
Axon Body 4 - Ext Warranty - Flex POV Module 12
Axon Fleet 3 - Ext Warranty - 2 Camera Kit 8
Axon Signal - Ext Warranty - Signal Vehicle 8
ESTIMATED SHIPPING DATE: Oct 1, 2026
Shipping Location: 450 E Latham Ave, Hemet, CA, 92543-4224, USA
SOFTWARE QTY
Axon Evidence - Fleet Vehicle License 8
Axon Evidence - Storage - Fleet 1 Camera Unlimited 16
ESTIMATED SHIPPING DATE: Sep 1, 2031
Shipping Location: 450 E Latham Ave, Hemet, CA, 92543-4224, USA
HARDWARE QTY
Axon Body - TAP Refresh 1 - Axon Body 4 Flex POV 12
Axon Fleet - TAP Refresh 1 - 2 Camera Kit 8
ESTIMATED SHIPPING DATE: Mar 31, 2035
Shipping Location: 450 E Latham Ave, Hemet, CA, 92543-4224, USA
HARDWARE QTY
Axon Fleet - TAP Refresh 2 - 2 Camera Kit 8
Axon Enterprise, Inc. Doc ID: 40ba0d6373bf Tax estimates are approximate and subject to change at time of invoicing.
Q-898704-005 • Page 3 of 4
18.K.
Hemet Police Department - CA Q-898704-005 Generated Aug 19, 2026
TERMS & CONDITIONS
Tax is estimated based on rates applicable at date of quote and subject to change at time of invoicing. If a tax exemption certificate should be applied, please submit prior to invoicing.
STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Axon Master Services and Purchasing Agreement:
This Quote is limited to and conditional upon your acceptance of the provisions set forth herein and Axon’s Master Services and Purchasing Agreement (posted at https:// www.axon.com/sales-terms-and-conditions), as well as the attached Statement of Work (SOW) for Axon Fleet and/or Axon Interview Room purchase, if applicable. In the event you and Axon have entered into a prior agreement to govern all future purchases, that agreement shall govern to the extent it includes the products and services being purchased and does not conflict with the Axon Customer Experience Improvement Program Appendix as described below.
ACEIP:
The Axon Customer Experience Improvement Program Appendix, which includes the sharing of de-identified segments of Agency Content with Axon to develop new products and improve your product experience (posted at www.axon.com/legal/sales-terms-and-conditions), is incorporated herein by reference. By signing below, you agree to the terms of the Axon Customer Experience Improvement Program.
Acceptance of Terms:
Any purchase order issued in response to this Quote is subject solely to the above referenced terms and conditions. By signing below, you represent that you are lawfully able to enter into contracts. If you are signing on behalf of an entity (including but not limited to the company, municipality, or government agency for whom you work), you represent to Axon that you have legal authority to bind that entity. If you do not have this authority, please do not sign this Quote.
EXCEPTIONS TO STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Rewrite Estimates
Estimated Amounts and Contract Terminations. Any amounts stated as due under existing or terminated contracts — including contract transfer balances carried forward to new or pending contracts — are estimates based on payments received as of the calculation date. These estimates may be adjusted if new contracts are not executed on the anticipated dates or if expected payments are not made.
Refresh Shipment Timing
Technology Assurance Plan (TAP) Refresh Prior to Renewal. For Customers with expiring agreements that include TAP refresh rights, Axon may, in its discretion, ship refresh hardware under the existing contract while renewal or replacement agreements are in progress. Any such shipments will be deemed made under the terms of the existing contract until the new contract is fully executed, after which any applicable updates, fees, or adjustments will apply.
Shipment Timing
Shipment Variance . Estimated shipment dates are provided for planning purposes only and are not guarantees. Axon may ship hardware before or after the estimated shipment date, and failure to meet an estimated shipment date will not, by itself, constitute a breach, provided Axon uses commercially reasonable efforts to meet estimated shipment dates.
Signature Date Signed
8/19/2026
Axon Enterprise, Inc. Doc ID: 40ba0d6373bf Tax estimates are approximate and subject to change at time of invoicing.
Q-898704-005 • Page 4 of 4
18.K.
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
CITY OF HEMET
HEMET, CALIFORNIA
RESOLUTION NO. 2025- 010
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HEMET AWARDING A TEN- YEAR AGREEMENT TO AXON
ENTERPRISES, INC. FOR THE PROVISION OF
ADVANCED LAW ENFORCEMENT TECHNOLOGIES,
INCLUDING TASERS, CAMERAS, VIRTUAL REALITY
TRAINING EQUIPMENT, SOFTWARE LICENSES, AND
RELATED SERVICES, IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED
5, 833, 099. 15, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER
TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT AND ASSOCIATED
PURCHASE ORDERS
The City Council of the City of Hemet, California ( hereafter referred to as the " City Council") does resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, the City of Hemet Police Department has utilized advanced law enforcement technologies provided by Axon Enterprises, Inc., including Taser energy weapons, body -worn cameras, in -car cameras, auto -tagging systems, and software solutions to improve officer and public safety, enhance operational efficiency, and reduce liability; and
WHEREAS, the current contracts with Axon Enterprises, Inc. for these critical technologies are set to expire by 2027, with the cost of renewal for similar services anticipated to increase significantly due to market pricing; and WHEREAS, the Hemet Police Department has identified the need for a comprehensive agreement that consolidates and upgrades existing technologies, ensuring continued access to state- of-the- art equipment such as Taser 10 energy ET 1
18.K.
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 weapons, Axon A134 body -worn cameras, Fleet 3 in -car cameras, virtual reality training systems, and software licenses with advanced features; and WHEREAS, the proposed ten- year agreement with Axon Enterprises, Inc. includes terms for technology updates, ongoing technical support, and training tools, enabling the Hemet Police Department to meet its operational, training, and public safety objectives; and
WHEREAS, the total cost of the agreement is $ 5, 833, 099. 15, which represents a cost-effective consolidation of existing contracts and includes terms for transfer credits from unused portions of prior agreements; and
WHEREAS, the funding for the first year of the agreement, in the amount of 406, 366. 73, has been allocated, and funding for subsequent years will be incorporated into future budgets; and
WHEREAS, awarding the proposed agreement will ensure continued transparency, accountability, and efficiency in law enforcement operations while safeguarding the public and officers through improved de- escalation tools and training systems.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HEMET FINDS, DETERMINES, ORDERS AND RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. FINDINGS — That the City Council hereby enters into a ten-year agreement with Axon Enterprises, Inc. for the provision of advanced law enforcement technologies, including Tasers, Cameras, Virtual Reality Training Equipment, Software Licenses, and Related Services, in an amount not to exceed $ 5, 833, 099. 15.
18.K.
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
2.3 24
25 26
27 SECTION 2. DETERMINES — Funding for the first year of this contract has been identified and will be paid for by general funds and supplemented with COPS allocation.
SECTION 3. ORDERS - The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to enter into a ten- year purchase contract with Axon Enterprises, Inc, in an amount not to exceed $ 5, 833,099. 15.
SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE - This Resolution shall become effective on January 14, 2025.
3
18.K.
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of January, 2025. e reterson, mayo
ATTEST: ,
J
Johnhaul Maier, City Clerk
F HEMET RESOLUTION NO. 2025- 010 4
18.K.
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
State of California )
County of Riverside )
City of Hemet )
I, John Paul Maier, City Clerk of the City of Hemet, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted by the Hemet City Council on the 14th day of January, 2025, and was passed by the following vote:
AYES: Council Members: Krupa, Lodge, Males, Mayor Pro Tem Kendrick, Mayor Peterson
NOES: Council Members: None.
ABSTAIN: Council Members: None.
ABSENT: Council Members: None.
J V"
John Paul Maier, City Clerk
5
18.K.
18.K.
CITY OF HEMET RESOLUTIO N0
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 CITY OF HEMET
HEMET, CALIFORNIA
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-177
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITYOF
HEMET, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE AMENDMENT
TO MASTER EQUITY LEASE AGREEMENT WITH
ENTERPRISE FLEET MANAGEMENT UTILIZING THE
SOURCEWELL MASTER VEHICLE CONTRACT 030122-
EFM FOR THE PURCHASE OF FOUR (4) 2026 FORD F-150
POLICE RESPONDERS, APPROVING UP-FITTING
THROUGH AEP CALIFORNIA AND VEHICLE BRANDING
THROUGH DUNGEON WRAPS & DESIGNS FOR A TOTAL
PROJECT COST OF $371,529.32, AUTHORIZING THE
CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE ALL NECESSARY
AGREEMENTS AND PURCHASE ORDERS, AND
AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
DIRECTOR TO ESTABLISH SUPPLEMENTAL
APPROPRIATIONS OF $371,529.32 IN MEASURE U
The City Council of the City of Hemet, California (hereafter referred to as the “City Council”) does resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, the Hemet Police Department’s AERO Team conducts enforcement, outreach, and quality-of—lifeoperations that require vehicles capable of off-road access, cargo transport, and sustained field use; and
WHEREAS, the AERO Team is expanding its staffing levels, necessitating additional enforcement vehicles to support increased operational responsibilities; and WHEREAS, the Ford F-150 Police Responder is a police—ratedvehicle designed to meet the durability, safety, and performance requirements of law enforcement operations; and
1
18.K.
CITY OF HEMET RESOLUTION NO. 2025-177
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 WHEREAS, Enterprise Fleet Management provides access to the 2026 Ford F150 Police Responder through the competitively solicited Sourcewell Master Vehicle Contract O30122-EFM; and
WHEREAS, police equipment upfitting willbe performed by American Emergency Products (AEP), which holds a valid sole-source designation with the City and maintains consistency and standardization within the Police Department fleet; and WHEREAS, vehicle branding and decals will be completed by Dungeon Wraps & Designs, 3 local Hemet business with established experience providing markings for the Police Department fleet; and
WHEREAS, the total project cost for the purchase, outfitting, and branding of four (4) fully operational enforcement vehicles is $371,529.32; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the acquisition of these vehicles is in the best interest of public safety, operational efficiency, and the effective delivery of qualityof—lifeservices to the community.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HEMET FINDS, DETERMINES, ORDERS, AND RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The recitals set forth above are hereby adopted as findings in support of this Resolution.
SECTION 2. The City Council hereby approves the Amendment to Master Equity Lease Agreement with Enterprise Fleet Management utilizing the Sourcewell Master Vehicle Contract 030122-EFM for the purchase of four (4) 2026 Ford F-150 Police Responders and approves up-fitting through AEP California and vehicle branding through Dungeon Wraps & Designs for a total project cost of $371,529.32.
18.K.
CITY OF HEMET RESOLUTION NO. 2025-1
10 ll
l2
l3
14 15
l6
l7
l8
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
SECTION 3. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute al l
necessary agreements, purchase orders, and related documents to complete the acquisition and outfitting of these vehicles.
SECTION 4. The City Council hereby authorizes the Administrative Services Director to establish supplemental appropriations of $371,529.32 in Measure U.
SECTION 5. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon adoption.
18.K.
(u p
05L
CITY OF HEMET RESOLUTION NO. 25-177
10 ll
12 l3
l4
l5
l6
l7
l8
19 20
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 9th day of December, 2025.
ATTEST:
Joh ul Maier, City Clerk
, Mayor
18.K.
Pa
CITY OF HEMET RESOLUTION NO. 2025-177
10 ll
l2
l3
14 15
16 l7
l8
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
State of California )
County of Riverside )
City of Hemet )
I, John Paul Maier, City Clerk of the City of Hemet, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted by the Hemet City Council on the 9th day of December, 2025, and was passed by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN
ABSENT:
John
Council Members: Clark, Lodge, Peterson, Mayor Pro Tem Males, Mayor Krupa.
Council Members:
Council Members:
Council Members:
ul Maier, City Clerk
18.K.
18.K.
City of Hemet
City Council Meeting
STAFF REPORT
Meeting: City Council Meeting - Sep 08 2026
Department: Human Resources
Submitted by: Noah Rau, Interim City Manager
Norma Rangel, Human Resources Manager;
☐ Receive and File ☒ Consent Calendar ☐ Business Item ☐ Public Hearing TITLE:
A Resolution Approving a Limited Term Appointment of Cameron Phillips to the Position of Extra Help Fire Chief and Approval of Employment Agreement Under Government Code Section 21224 RECOMMENDED ACTION:
It is respectfully recommended that the City Council adopt the following resolution (Attachment No. 1):
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-153: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HEMET,
CALIFORNIA, APPOINTING CAMERON PHILLIPS AS EXTRA HELP FIRE CHIEF EFFECTIVE SEPTEMBER 14, 2026; APPROVING THE TEMPORARY AT-WILL EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT FOR CAMERON PHILLIPS AS A CALPERS RETIRED ANNUITANT; AND MAKING SPECIFIC
FINDINGS REGARDING THE NECESSITY OF THE APPOINTMENT AND COMPLIANCE WITH GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 21224 AND 7522.56
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City experienced a vacancy in the Fire Chief position and appointed Cameron Phillips, a highly experienced fire service professional and CalPERS retired annuitant, to serve as Interim Fire Chief while conducting a recruitment for a permanent replacement. As the City moves forward with hiring a full-time Fire Chief, the Interim City Manager recommends retaining Phillips on a limited-term basis to provide transitional support, assistance, and training to help ensure the new Fire Chief's success.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
The City of Hemet experienced a vacancy in the position of Fire Chief following the resignation of the previous incumbent. Given the critical nature of fire and emergency medical services, it is essential to maintain executive leadership and oversight of the Fire Department to ensure public safety and the continuity of operations. The City initiated an active recruitment process to identify a permanent Fire Chief. In the interim, Cameron Phillips, a highly experienced fire service professional and CalPERS retired annuitant, was determined to be uniquely qualified to serve as the Interim Fire Chief. Now, the City is in the process of hiring a full-time Fire Chief. The Interim City Manager determined that it is in
18.L.
the best interests of the City to retain Phillips on a limited term basis as an Extra Help Fire Chief to provide assistance and training needed for the Fire Chief to be successful in that capacity.
DISCUSSION:
Hiring a retired annuitant into a vacant position is strictly governed by the California Public Employees’ Retirement Law (PERL) and the Public Employees’ Pension Reform Act (PEPRA). This appointment meets all statutory requirements as outlined below:
1. Statutory Authority for Interim Appointment. Cal. Gov't Code § 21224 provides that a retired person may serve without reinstatement from retirement or loss or interruption of benefits provided by this system upon appointment by the public agency employer because the retired person has specialized skills needed in performing work of limited duration. These appointments shall not exceed a combined total of 960 hours for all employers each fiscal year. The compensation for the appointment shall not exceed the maximum monthly base salary paid to other employees performing comparable duties as listed on a publicly available pay schedule divided by 173.333 to equal an hourly rate. A retired person appointed pursuant to this section shall not receive any benefit, incentive, compensation in lieu of benefits, or other form of compensation in addition to the hourly pay rate. A retired person appointed pursuant to this section shall not work more than 960 hours each fiscal year, regardless of whether the retired person works for one or more employers.
2. Compensation and Hour Limitations. The proposed Employment Agreement complies with all CalPERS financial restrictions: (i) Hourly Rate: The rate of $135.38 is derived from the City's publicly available salary schedule for the Fire Chief position; (ii) 960-Hour Limit: Mr. Phillips is prohibited from working more than 960 hours per fiscal year; (iii) No Benefits: In accordance with state law, Chief Phillips will receive no benefits, incentives, or compensation in lieu of benefits.
3. CalPERS financial restrictions: (i) Hourly Rate: The rate of $135.38 is derived from the City's publicly available salary schedule for the Fire Chief position; (ii) 960-Hour Limit: Mr. Phillips is prohibited from working more than 960 hours per fiscal year; (iii) No Benefits: In accordance with state law, Chief Phillips will receive no benefits, incentives, or compensation in lieu of benefits.
The proposed employment agreement (Attachment 2) incorporates the necessary legal and regulatory requirements as provided above. Chief Phillips’ extensive experience as a Chief Officer constitutes the specialized skills necessary to perform the duties of this temporary Extra Help Fire Chief assignment, including assistance and necessary training for the Fire Chief to be successful in that capacity. This work is of a limited duration.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION:
On January 27, 2026, Council approved the Employment Agreement for Phillips as a CalPERS Retired Annuitant Interim Fire Chief.
STRATEGIC PLAN INTEGRATION:
GOAL ONE: QUALITY OF LIFE:
To ensure that Hemet is safe, clean, attractive and comfortable for all who live, work, and visit.
Objective 1: Enhance the visual appearance of the community to make it attractive and reduce blight.
Objective 2: Explore and implement homelessness solutions for the City of Hemet.
18.L.
Objective 3: Increase Public Safety visibility and response.
GOAL FIVE: ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS
To identify the work needed inside the City organization to effectively provide services to the community and ensure financial stability.
Objective 1: Operate in a financially sustainable manner.
Objective 2: Evaluate existing practices to ensure continuity with industry best practices.
Objective 3: Provide Council with policies that are consistent while lessening liabilities.
Objective 4: Increase employee retention by training and creating a positive workplace.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The maximum term of Phillips extra help status will expire upon 960 hours or October 16, 2026, whichever comes first. This is the equivalent of two additional pay periods. Existing salary savings from a vacancy is sufficient to cover this additional cost. No additional appropriations are needed.
ALTERNATIVE(S):
Council may either choose not to approve this agreement or provide alternative direction to the Interim City Manager.
ATTACHMENT(S):
Attachment 1 - Reso. No. 2026-153
Attachment 2 - Extra Help Fire Chief Employment Agreement
18.L.
CITY OF HEMET RESOLUTION NO. 2026-153 1
CITY OF HEMET
HEMET, CALIFORNIA
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-153
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF HEMET, CALIFORNIA, APPOINTING CAMERON
PHILLIPS AS EXTRA HELP FIRE CHIEF EFFECTIVE
SEPTEMBER 14, 2026; APPROVING THE TEMPORARY
AT-WILL EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT FOR CAMERON
PHILLIPS AS A CALPERS RETIRED ANNUITANT; AND
MAKING SPECIFIC FINDINGS REGARDING THE
NECESSITY OF THE APPOINTMENT AND COMPLIANCE
WITH GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 21224 AND
7522.56,
The City Council of the City of Hemet, California (hereafter referred to as the “City Council”) does resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, the City of Hemet experienced a vacancy in the position of Fire Chief following the resignation of the previous incumbent, and given the critical nature of fire and emergency medical services, it is essential to maintain executive leadership and oversight of the Fire Department to ensure public safety and the continuity of operations; and
WHEREAS, the City initiated an active recruitment process to identify a permanent Fire Chief. In the interim, Cameron Phillips, a highly experienced fire service professional and CalPERS retired annuitant, was determined to be uniquely qualified to serve as the Interim Fire Chief; and
WHEREAS, the City has recently hired a full-time Fire Chief, and the Interim City Manager determined that it is in the best interests of the City to retain Phillips on a
18.L.
CITY OF HEMET RESOLUTION NO. 2026-153 1
limited-term basis as an Extra Help Fire Chief to provide assistance and training needed for the Fire Chief to be successful in that capacity; and WHEREAS, hiring a retired annuitant into a vacant position is strictly governed by the California Public Employees' Retirement Law (PERL) and the Public Employees' Pension Reform Act (PEPRA), and this appointment meets all statutory requirements; and
WHEREAS, statutory authority for the appointment is provided by Cal. Gov't Code § 21224, which allows a retired person to serve without reinstatement from retirement or loss or interruption of benefits provided by this system, upon appointment by the public agency employer, because the retired person has specialized skills needed in performing work of limited duration; and
WHEREAS, the appointment shall not exceed a combined total of 960 hours for all employers each fiscal year. The compensation for the appointment shall not exceed the maximum monthly base salary paid to other employees performing comparable duties as listed on a publicly available pay schedule divided by 173.333 to equal an hourly rate; and
WHEREAS, the Employment Agreement complies with all CalPERS financial restrictions: (i) Hourly Rate: The rate of $135.38 is derived from the City's publicly available salary schedule for the Fire Chief position; (ii) 960-Hour Limit: Chief Phillips is prohibited from working more than 960 hours per fiscal year; (iii) No Benefits: In accordance with state law, Chief Phillips will receive no benefits, incentives, or compensation in lieu of benefits.
18.L.
CITY OF HEMET RESOLUTION NO. 2026-153 1
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HEMET FINDS, DETERMINES, ORDERS AND RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The City Council hereby appoints Cameron Phillips as Extra Help Fire Chief, effective September 14, 2026, pursuant to the authority and requirements of Government Code Sections 21224 and 7522.56.
SECTION 2. The City Council hereby approves the Employment Agreement between the City of Hemet and Cameron Phillips and authorizes the City Manager to execute the same.
SECTION 3. The City Council hereby certifies that the nature of the employment and the specialized skills of Phillips are essential for the continued operation of the Fire Department during the transition period.
SECTION 4. The City Manager and Human Resources are hereby authorized and directed to take all such other and further actions as may be necessary to effectuate the intent of this Resolution and to ensure compliance with CalPERS reporting and monitoring requirements, including but not limited to the timely reporting of hours and compensation.
SECTION 5. The term of Phillips extra help status will expire upon reaching 960 hours worked for the fiscal year or October 11, 2026, whichever comes first. This is the equivalent of two additional pay periods. Existing salary savings from a vacancy is sufficient to cover this additional cost. No additional appropriations are needed.
SECTION 6. This Resolution shall become effective upon adoption.
18.L.
CITY OF HEMET RESOLUTION NO. 2026-153 1
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of September, 2026. ___________________________
Linda Krupa, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
________________________ __________________________
Steven Graham Pacifico, City Attorney Rosalia A. Butler, MMC, City Clerk State of California )
County of Riverside )
City of Hemet )
I, Rosalia A. Butler, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Hemet, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted by the Hemet City Council on the 8th day of September, 2026, and was passed by the following vote:
AYES: Council Members:
NOES: Council Members:
ABSTAIN: Council Members:
ABSENT: Council Members:
_____________________________
Rosalia A. Butler, MMC, City Clerk
18.L.
1 AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HEMET AND CAMERON PHILLIPS FOR TEMPORARY AT-WILL EMPLOYMENT AS EXTRA HELP FIRE CHIEF:
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 21224 AND 7522.56
This Employment Agreement ("Agreement") serves as a contract of temporary, at-will, employment and is made and entered by and between the CITY OF HEMET, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY," and CAMERON PHILLIPS, an individual, hereinafter referred to as “PHILLIPS."
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the CITY previously hired PHILLIPS pursuant to the requirements of Gov. Code section 21221(h) to fill a vacancy on a temporary basis for a limited duration to perform Fire Chief duties, including full oversight and management of the CITY’S Fire Department, due to the vacancy of the Fire Chief position; and
WHEREAS, the CITY filled the position of Fire Chief and now desires to transition PHILLIPS into the position of Extra Help Fire Chief so that PHILLIPS can provide the assistance and training needed for the Fire Chief to be successful in that capacity; and WHEREAS, PHILLIPS is a retired annuitant under the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) and is limited in his ability to accept public employment without reinstatement pursuant to Government Code Section and 21224, and may not work more than 960 hours within a fiscal year (July 1 through June 30); and WHEREAS, PHILLIPS possesses the specialized skills and training required to perform the duties of this temporary Extra Help Fire Chief assignment; and WHEREAS, PHILLIPS provided temporary services to the City and within the constraints of Government Code Sections 21221(h) and 7522.56 as a CalPERS retired public safety annuitant, and the City desires to employ the services of PHILLIPS as Extra Help Fire Chief of the City of Hemet within the constraints of Government Code Section 21224 on these terms to provide specialized services of a limited duration, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the compensation paid to retirees cannot be less than the minimum, nor exceed the maximum monthly base salary paid to other employees performing comparable duties, divided by 173.333 to equal the hourly rate; and
WHEREAS, the maximum base salary for this position is $23,466 per month and the hourly equivalent is $135.38, and the minimum base salary for this position is $17,510 per month and the hourly equivalent is $101.02; and
WHEREAS, the hourly rate paid to PHILLIPS will be $135.38; and
18.L.
2 WHEREAS, no matters, issues, terms or conditions related to this employment and appointment have been or will be placed on a consent calendar;
WHEREAS, PHILLIPS has not, and will not, receive any other benefit, incentive, compensation in lieu of benefit or other form of compensation from the City in addition to the hourly pay rate identified above.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, in consideration of this Agreement, and the mutual promises, covenants and stipulations herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows:
OPERATIVE PROVISIONS
1. APPOINTMENT OF EXTRA HELP FIRE CHIEF
A. As a retired public safety CalPERS annuitant, the CITY appointed PHILLIPS to the position of Interim Fire Chief on a work schedule determined by the City Manager, or designee, not to exceed 960 hours in a single fiscal year. The Fire Chief position will be filled and on September 13, 2026 and any prior agreement between the CITY and PHILLIPS will terminate on that date. Effective September 14, 2026, PHILLIPS is appointed to the position of Extra Help Fire Chief.
PHILLIPS is required to track all hours worked and regularly report them to the City Manager, or designee. PHILLIPS shall immediately notify the City Manager if cumulative hours worked approach 900 hours in any fiscal year to ensure compliance with the 960-hour annual limitation under Government Code Section 21224.
B. PHILLIPS hereby agrees to faithfully and diligently perform the assigned duties as specified by this Agreement.
C. The CITY hereby agrees to employ PHILLIPS as a temporary, at-will, employee of the CITY.
2. SCOPE OF SERVICES
A. PHILLIPS will perform the services needed to serve the CITY which include, without limitation, performing the functions and duties specified by statute and relevant City regulations for an Extra Help Fire Chief, and to perform such other legally permissible and proper duties and functions as the CITY may assign.
B. PHILLIPS is appointed as a temporary, at-will, employee and will temporarily provide highly specialized skills in connection with provision of Extra Help Fire Chief services to City staff, City officials and the community.
C. PHILLIPS shall perform services consistent with the specialized expertise and professional skill and care ordinarily provided by Extra Help Fire Chiefs in the same or similar locality under the same of similar circumstances.
18.L.
3 3. TERM; TEMPORARY, AT WILL EMPLOYMENT RELATIONSHIP
A. PHILLIPS’ temporary employment will commence on the September 14, 2026 and will expire upon the earlier of the following: (i) October 11, 2026 or (ii) upon reaching 960 hours worked for the City in a fiscal year. This Agreement may be terminated sooner as set forth herein or based upon the CITY's needs, as determined in the CITY’s sole discretion.
B. The temporary employment of PHILLIPS under this Agreement is at-will.
Nothing in this Agreement prevents, limits, or otherwise interferes with the right of PHILLIPS to resign from his position with the CITY. Nothing in this Agreement prevents, limits, or otherwise interferes with the right of the CITY to terminate the services of PHILLIPS. PHILLIPS has no property interest in this position.
C. PHILLIPS is appointed by and serves at the pleasure of the City Manager.
Nothing herein may be taken to imply or suggest a guaranteed term or tenure.
D. CITY may terminate this Agreement with or without cause at any time by serving PHILLIPS with notification of such termination by mail, email, or by City Representative's verbal notice of termination. CITY will compensate PHILLIPS for all hours actually worked and reimburse him for allowable costs pursuant to City policies incurred through and including the effective date of termination.
4. COMPENSATION
A. CITY agrees to pay PHILLIPS for his services rendered pursuant to this Agreement based on performance of duties comparable to those performed by the regular Fire Chief, at an hourly rate of $135.38 which does not exceed the hourly rate paid to other employees performing comparable duties as listed on the City's publicly available salary schedule. Payments will be made in installments in the same form and manner upon which other City employees are paid and will include all applicable payroll taxes and withholdings.
B. PHILLIPS agrees that for his services rendered pursuant to this Agreement no other compensation, benefits, incentives, compensation in lieu of benefits, or any other form of compensation in addition to the hourly pay rate and expense reimbursements specified in Section 4.C will be granted. CalPERS service credit will not be accrued and no additional retirement rights or benefits will be granted to PHILLIPS.
C. In addition to the foregoing compensation, CITY will reimburse PHILLIPS for actual and necessary ordinary out-of-pocket expenses as allowed by City policies and reasonably incurred in performance of the service provided to CITY pursuant to this Agreement.
18.L.
4 5. EXCLUSIVE EMPLOYMENT: PHILLIPS agrees to remain in the exclusive employment of the CITY while temporarily employed by the CITY, and to avoid any conflicting interests. Exclusive employment, however, is not construed to preclude occasional teaching, writing, speaking, or consulting performed on PHILLIPS’ time off, even if outside compensation is provided for such services. Said activities are expressly allowed, provided that in no case is any activity allowed which would present a conflict of interest with the City and City approves such activities. PHILLIPS agrees to provide written notification of any outside activity within the meaning of this provision upon which time, the City will have the sole discretion to approve or deny such activities.
6. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: PHILLIPS represents that he does not have any material financial interest, direct or indirect, in any contract or decision made by or on behalf of the CITY that may be affected by the services to be provided to the CITY pursuant to this Agreement, other than a financial interest that is similar, in all material respects, to the interests of the general public. PHILLIPS agrees to comply with the CITY’s conflict of interest code as adopted by the City Council.
7. CITY PROPERTY AND PROPRIETARY INFORMATION: PHILLIPS understands and agrees that, in the performance of the services under this Agreement, PHILLIPS may have access to private or confidential information that may be owned or controlled by CITY, and that such information may contain proprietary or confidential details, the disclosure of which to third parties may be damaging to CITY. PHILLIPS agrees that, absent express written consent of City, all information disclosed by CITY to PHILLIPS shall be held in confidence and used only in performance of the Agreement. PHILLIPS shall exercise the same standard of care to protect such information as a reasonably prudent employee would use to protect its own proprietary data.
8. INDEMNIFICATION: CITY acknowledges its statutory obligation under Government Code 825 and 995 to defend and indemnify PHILLIPS from and against any and all claims, actions and liabilities arising from work performed within the scope of his duties under this Agreement. The CITY may compromise and settle any such claim or suit and pay the amount of any settlement or judgment rendered therefrom. This section is not intended to provide any rights in excess of those rights provided by state law.
9. NOTICES: Notices pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and may be affected either by personal delivery or mail. Mailed notices shall be addressed to the parties as set forth below, but each party may change their address by written notice given in accordance with this section. Notices delivered personally will be deemed communicated as of actual receipt. Mailed notices will be deemed communicated and received as of three (3) calendar days following the date of mailing.
CITY EMPLOYEE
18.L.
5 City of Hemet
Attention: City Manager
445 E Florida Avenue
City Hall
Hemet, CA 92543
Cameron Phillips
(Home address on file with
the Human Resources
Department)
10. ENTIRE AGREEMENT: This Agreement represents the entire Agreement between the parties and supersedes any and all other Agreements, either oral or in writing, between the parties with respect to the temporary at-will employment of PHILLIPS by the CITY, and contains all of the covenants and Agreements between the parties with respect to that temporary at-will employment. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises, or Agreements, oral or otherwise, have been made by either party, or by anyone acting on behalf of either party, which are not embodied herein, and that no other employment Agreement, statement, or promise not contained in this Agreement shall be valid or binding upon either party.
11. GOVERNING LAW: In the event that suit shall be brought by either party to this Agreement, the parties agree that venue shall be exclusively vested in the state courts of the County of Riverside, California, and this Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. By entering into this Agreement and performing work or providing services hereunder, PHILLIPS consents to jurisdiction over their persons and over the subject matter of any claim or legal action in such courts, and consents to service of process issued by such courts.
12. INTERPRETATION: Each party has reviewed this Agreement and any question of doubtful interpretation shall not be resolved by any rule or interpretation providing for interpretation against the drafting party. This Agreement shall be construed as if both parties drafted it. The captions and headings contained herein are for convenience only and shall not affect the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement.
13. MODIFICATIONS: Except as specifically set forth herein, any modifications to this Agreement shall be effective only if in writing and signed by both parties hereto.
14. PARTIAL INVALIDITY: If any provision of this Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall nevertheless continue in full force and effect without being impaired or invalidated in any way.
15. ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES AND COUNTERPARTS: As permitted under the U.S.
Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce (ESIGN) Act of 2000, and the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA) , the parties hereby agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means. Accordingly, this Agreement may be executed through an electronic signature and may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. The parties agree that the electronic signatures appearing on this Agreement
18.L.
6 are intended by each party using it to have the same force and effect as the use of a manual signature for the purposes of validity, enforceability, and admissibility.
16. ACKNOWLEDGMENT: PHILLIPS acknowledges that he has had the opportunity to consult legal counsel of his choice in regard to this Agreement, that he has read and understands this Agreement, that he is fully aware of its legal effect, and that he has entered into it freely and voluntarily and based on his own judgment and not on any representations or promises other than those contained in this Agreement.
This Agreement has been signed on behalf of the City of Hemet by its City Manager and duly attested to by its City Clerk, and PHILLIPS has signed and executed the Agreement, as of September 14, 2026.
_____________________________ _____________________________ City of Hemet Employee
Noah Rau, Interim City Manager Cameron Phillips
ATTEST:
_____________________________
Rosalia A. Butler
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________
Steven Pacifico, City Attorney
18.L.
City of Hemet
City Council Meeting
STAFF REPORT
Meeting: City Council Meeting - Sep 08 2026
Department: Community Development
Submitted by: Noah Rau, Interim City Manager
Monique Alaniz-Flejter, Community Development Director; ☐ Receive and File ☒ Consent Calendar ☐ Business Item ☐ Public Hearing TITLE:
A Resolution for Continued Participation Under County of Riverside's Entitlement Local Government Designation; Delegating County of Riverside to Apply for and Administer Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) Program Allocation through the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD); Allocation Years 2024, 2025, 2026, 2027 and 2028.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
It is respectfully recommended that the City Council adopt the following resolution (Attachment No. 1):
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-155 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HEMET,
CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING CONTINUED PARTICIPATION UNDER THE COUNTY OF
RIVERSIDE'S ENTITLEMENT LOCAL GOVERNMENT DESIGNATION AND DELEGATING THE
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TO APPLY FOR AND ADMINISTER THE PERMANENT LOCAL HOUSING ALLOCATION (PLHA) PROGRAM ALLOCATION FOR ALLOCATION YEARS 2024, 2025, 2026, 2027 AND 2028
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Adoption of the proposed Resolution will authorize the City's continued participation in the PLHA Program through the County of Riverside, delegate the City's estimated $1,765,956 allocation for Allocation Years 2024 through 2028 to the County for application and administration, adopt the City's 2024–2028 PLHA Plan, and authorize the City Manager to execute the delegation agreement and other documents necessary to implement the City's continued participation in the Program.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
The Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) Program provides an ongoing source of funding to local governments for eligible housing-related programs and activities. Funding is provided by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) through the Building Homes and Jobs Trust Fund established pursuant to Senate Bill 2.
18.M.
On July 17, 2026, HCD issued a Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) for Cycle 2 of the PLHA Program, covering Allocation Years 2024 through 2028. The City of Hemet's estimated five-year formula allocation for this period is $1,765,956.
The City has historically participated in the PLHA Program through the County of Riverside's Entitlement Local Government designation. Under this structure, the City delegates its PLHA formula allocation to the County, which serves as the Applicant and Administering Local Government responsible for applying for and administering the funds on the City's behalf.
For the 2024–2028 funding cycle, the County has invited the City to continue its participation under this arrangement. Continued participation requires the City Council to authorize the delegation of the City's PLHA formula allocation to the County, approve the associated delegation agreement, and adopt the City's 2024–2028 PLHA Plan.
The proposed PLHA Plan identifies eligible uses of the City's allocation, including rental housing activities such as predevelopment, development, acquisition, rehabilitation, preservation, and necessary operating subsidies for multifamily housing, as well as affordable owner-occupied workforce housing activities, including down payment assistance.
DISCUSSION:
The County shall be the Applicant and Administering Local Government and shall execute the PLHA Standard Agreement, carry out all responsibilities as described in the Performance Terms, and work closely with HCD throughout the implementation of the Application. County commits to all duties and responsibilities corresponding to the Applicant’s role under the PLHA Plan for the length of the Term. this includes but is not limited to application submission, reporting requirements, loan servicing, longterm affordability monitoring, and regulatory compliance.
On July 17, 2026, the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) released its Notice of Funding Availability for Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) Program Cycle 2 (CY 2024-2028) Formula Allocations. The County of Riverside has invited the City of Hemet to continue to participate in the County's Entitlement Local Government designation Application for funding to support the following eligible activities:
Rental Activities- The payment of predevelopment, development, acquisition, rehabilitation, preservation costs, necessary operating subsidies, or any combination thereof, for Multifamily Housing.
Affordable Owner-Occupied Workforce Housing Activities- Homeownership opportunities, including, but not limited to, down payment assistance.
STRATEGIC PLAN INTEGRATION:
GOAL ONE: QUALITY OF LIFE:
To ensure that Hemet is safe, clean, attractive and comfortable for all who live, work, and visit.
1. Establish a Housing Program
18.M.
GOAL FOUR: PARTNERSHIP & COLLABORATION
To pursue partnerships that will increase the opportunities available to the community, including our businesses, unemployed, and youth populations.
Objective 2: Develop concepts and programs to enhance the quality of life services.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The recommended action will not have an impact upon the City’s General Fund. The City’s PLHA allocation will be fully grant-funded and allocated through HCD for Allocation Years 2024, 2025, 2026, 2027 and 2028.
ALTERNATIVE(S):
1. Do not authorize the City's continued participation in the PLHA Program through the County of Riverside
2. Provide alternative direction to the Interim City Manager.
ATTACHMENT(S):
Attachment No. 1 Reso. No. 2026-155
Attachment No. 2 Agreement
Attachment No. 3 Riverside County Letter
Attachment No. 4 PLHA Funds.2019-2023
18.M.
CITY OF HEMET RESOLUTION NO. 2026-155 1
111111
222222
333333
444444
555555
666666
777777
888888
999999
101010101010
111111111111
121212121212
131313131313
141414141414
151515151515
161616161616
171717171717
181818181818
191919191919
202020202020
212121212121
222222222222
232323232323
242424242424
252525252525
262626262626
272727272727
282828282828
CITY OF HEMET
HEMET, CALIFORNIA
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-155
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HEMET, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING CONTINUED
PARTICIPATION UNDER THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE'S
ENTITLEMENT LOCAL GOVERNMENT DESIGNATION
AND DELEGATING THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TO
APPLY FOR AND ADMINISTER THE PERMANENT
LOCAL HOUSING ALLOCATION (PLHA) PROGRAM
ALLOCATION FOR ALLOCATION YEARS 2024, 2025,
2026, 2027 AND 2028
The City Council of the City of Hemet, California (hereafter referred to as the “City Council”) does resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, the Department is authorized to provide up to $137.5 million in CY 2024 funds and $147.2 million in CY 2025 funds under the SB 2 Permanent Local Housing Allocation Program Formula Component from the Building Homes and Jobs Trust Fund for assistance to Cities and Counties (as described in Health and Safety Code section 50470 et seq. (Chapter 364, Statutes of 2017 (SB 2)); and WHEREAS, the State of California (the "State"), Department of Housing and Community Development ("Department") issued a Notice of Funding Availability ("NOFA") dated 07/17/2026 under the Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) Program for Cycle 2 (CY 2024-2028) Formula Allocations; and WHEREAS, the County of Riverside is an eligible Local government that has invited the City of Hemet to continue participating in the County's Entitlement Local Government designation, and the City of Hemet has elected to delegate to the County
18.M.
CITY OF HEMET RESOLUTION NO. 2026-155 2
111111
222222
333333
444444
555555
666666
777777
888888
999999
101010101010
111111111111
121212121212
131313131313
141414141414
151515151515
161616161616
171717171717
181818181818
191919191919
202020202020
212121212121
222222222222
232323232323
242424242424
252525252525
262626262626
272727272727
282828282828
of Riverside its PLHA formula allocation, such that the County of Riverside shall serve as the Applicant and Administering Local Government; and WHEREAS, the City's estimated five-year PLHA allocation for Allocation Years 2024 through 2028 is $1,765,956; and
WHEREAS, the Department may approve funding allocations for the PLHA Program, subject to the terms and conditions of the Guidelines, NOFA, Program requirements, the Standard Agreement, and other contracts between the Department and PLHA grant recipients.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HEMET FINDS, DETERMINES, ORDERS AND RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The recitals set forth above are hereby adopted as findings in support of this Resolution.
SECTION 2. The City of Hemet hereby elects to continue its participation under the County of Riverside's Entitlement Local Government designation and delegates to the County of Riverside the responsibility to submit an application for, and to administer, the City's PLHA formula allocation for Allocation Years 2024 through 2028.
SECTION 3. The County of Riverside, as Applicant and Administering Local Government, is authorized to receive a PLHA grant, in an amount not to exceed the five-year estimate of the PLHA formula allocations, as stated in Appendix B of the current NOFA for Allocation Years 2024 - 2028, in accordance with all applicable rules and laws, including the City's estimated five-year allocation of $1,765,956.
SECTION 4. If the County of Riverside receives a grant of PLHA funds from the Department pursuant to the above referenced PLHA NOFA on behalf of the City of
18.M.
CITY OF HEMET RESOLUTION NO. 2026-155 3
111111
222222
333333
444444
555555
666666
777777
888888
999999
101010101010
111111111111
121212121212
131313131313
141414141414
151515151515
161616161616
171717171717
181818181818
191919191919
202020202020
212121212121
222222222222
232323232323
242424242424
252525252525
262626262626
272727272727
282828282828
Hemet, such funds shall be used in a manner consistent and in compliance with all applicable state and federal statutes, rules, regulations, and laws, including without limitation all rules and laws regarding the PLHA Program, as well as any and all contracts with the Department.
SECTION 5. The PLHA funds shall be used for eligible activities as approved by the Department and in accordance with all Program requirements, Guidelines, other rules and laws, as well as in a manner consistent and in compliance with the Standard Agreement and other contracts between the County of Riverside and the Department.
The eligible activities to be supported include:
(a) Rental Activities — the payment of predevelopment, development, acquisition, rehabilitation, preservation costs, necessary operating subsidies, or any combination thereof, for Multifamily Housing; and
(b) Affordable Owner-Occupied Workforce Housing Activities — homeownership opportunities, including, but not limited to, down payment assistance.
SECTION 6. Pursuant to Section 302(c)(4) of the Guidelines, the PLHA Plan for the 2024-2028 Allocations is attached to this resolution, and the City Council hereby adopts this PLHA Plan and certifies compliance with all public notice, public comment, and public hearing requirements in accordance with the Guidelines.
SECTION 7. Pursuant to Guidelines Section 300(c) and 300(d), the City of Hemet hereby delegates its PLHA formula allocation to the County of Riverside, and a legally binding agreement between the City of Hemet and the County of Riverside shall be submitted with the PLHA application.
18.M.
CITY OF HEMET RESOLUTION NO. 2026-155 4
111111
222222
333333
444444
555555
666666
777777
888888
999999
101010101010
111111111111
121212121212
131313131313
141414141414
151515151515
161616161616
171717171717
181818181818
191919191919
202020202020
212121212121
222222222222
232323232323
242424242424
252525252525
262626262626
272727272727
282828282828
SECTION 8. If applicable: The County of Riverside, as Administering Local Government, certifies that it has or will subgrant some or all of its PLHA funds to another entity or entities. Pursuant to Guidelines Section 302(c)(3), "entity" means a housing developer or program operator, but does not mean an administering Local government to whom a Local government may delegate its PLHA allocation.
SECTION 9. If applicable: The selection process of any subgrantees was or will be accessible to the public and avoided or shall avoid any conflicts of interest.
SECTION 10. If applicable: The PLHA funds will be expended only for eligible Activities and consistent with all program requirements.
SECTION 11. If applicable: If funds are used for the acquisition, construction or rehabilitation of owner-occupied housing, the grantee shall record a deed restriction against the property that will ensure compliance with one of the requirements stated in Guidelines Section 302(c)(5)(A), (B) and (C).
SECTION 12. If applicable: If funds are used for the development of an Affordable Rental Housing Development, the Administering Local Government shall make PLHA assistance in the form of a low-interest, deferred loan to the Sponsor of the Project, and such loan shall be evidenced through a Promissory Note secured by a Deed of Trust and a Regulatory Agreement shall restrict occupancy and rents in accordance with a Local government-approved underwriting of the Project for a term of at least 55 years.
SECTION 13. The City of Hemet shall be subject to the terms and conditions as specified in the delegation agreement with the County of Riverside, the PLHA Program Guidelines and any other applicable SB 2 Guidelines published by the Department.
18.M.
CITY OF HEMET RESOLUTION NO. 2026-155 5
111111
222222
333333
444444
555555
666666
777777
888888
999999
101010101010
111111111111
121212121212
131313131313
141414141414
151515151515
161616161616
171717171717
181818181818
191919191919
202020202020
212121212121
222222222222
232323232323
242424242424
252525252525
262626262626
272727272727
282828282828
SECTION 14. The City Manager is hereby authorized to execute the delegation agreement with the County of Riverside and any subsequent amendments or modifications thereto, as well as any other documents which are related to the Program or the City's continued participation under the County's Entitlement Local Government designation, as may be deemed appropriate. Per California Government Code Section 40602, if a city applicant designates anyone other than the Mayor as the Authorized Representative, the application must include a copy of the ordinance that explicitly grants this authority to the designated officer.
SECTION 15. This Resolution shall become effective upon adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 8th of September 2026. ___________________________
Linda Krupa, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
________________________ __________________________
Steven Graham Pacifico, City Attorney Rosalia A. Butler, MMC, City Clerk
18.M.
CITY OF HEMET RESOLUTION NO. 2026-155 6
111111
222222
333333
444444
555555
666666
777777
888888
999999
101010101010
111111111111
121212121212
131313131313
141414141414
151515151515
161616161616
171717171717
181818181818
191919191919
202020202020
212121212121
222222222222
232323232323
242424242424
252525252525
262626262626
272727272727
282828282828
State of California )
County of Riverside )
City of Hemet )
I, Rosalia A. Butler, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Hemet, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted by the Hemet City Council on the 8th day of September, 2026, and was passed by the following vote:
AYES: Council Members:
NOES: Council Members:
ABSTAIN: Council Members:
ABSENT: Council Members:
_____________________________
Rosalia A. Butler, MMC, City Clerk
18.M.
AGREEMENT
for
THE PERMANENT LOCAL HOUSING ALLOCATION (PLHA) PROGRAM
UNDER THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (HCD)
FOR ALLOCATION YEARS 2024-2028
by and between
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
and
CITY OF HEMET,
Dated ______________________, 20____
18.M.
AGREEMENT FOR THE PERMANENT LOCAL HOUSING ALLOCATION (PLHA)
PROGRAM UNDER THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (HCD) FOR ALLOCATION YEARS 2024-2028
THIS AGREEMENT FOR THE PERMANENT LOCAL HOUSING ALLOCATION (PLHA) PROGRAM UNDER THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (HCD) FOR ALLOCATION YEARS 2024-2028 (Agreement) is made and entered into this ___ day of _______________, 2026, by and between THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, a political subdivision of the State of California, through its Housing, Homelessness Prevention and Workforce Solutions (“County” or “Administering Local Government”), and THE CITY OF HEMET, a California municipal corporation (“City” or “Delegating Local Government”). Together, County and City may hereafter be referred to individually as “Party,” or collectively as “Parties”.
RECITALS
A. Chapter 364, Statutes of 2017 (SB 2, Atkins), as authorized by Health and Safety Code (HSC) Section 50470, established the Building Homes and Jobs Trust Fund (Fund) and the Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) Program (“PLHA Program”) which was designed to provide a permanent source of funding to all local governments in California to help cities and counties implement plans to increase the affordable housing stock.
B. HSC Section 50470 authorizes the HCD to allocate moneys collected and deposited in the Fund for the PLHA Program, with 90 percent of PLHA funds to local governments, and to adopt Guidelines to implement the PLHA Program.
C. The Parties are both Entitlement Local Governments that each separately received a Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) for fiscal year 2017 pursuant to the federal CDBG formula specified in 42 U.S.C. Section 5306.
D. Pursuant to Section 300(c) of the HCD Guidelines, a local government may delegate another local government to submit an application and administer the formula component of PLHA funds on its behalf, provided the local governments enter into an agreement and the funds are expended for eligible activities consistent with program requirements.
E. Consistent with HCD Guidelines, City desires to delegate to County the responsibility for submitting an application for administering its formula component for Allocation Years 2024-2028 (“City’s Allocations”) in the estimated funding amount of One Million Seven Hundred Sixty-Five Thousand Nine Hundred Fifty-Six dollars ($1,765,956).
F. The City fully supports the objectives, goals, strategies, programs and projects identified under the PLHA Formula Allocation 2026 Application that was proposed by the County for approval by the HCD (“Application”), and the City agrees to delegate its PLHA formula allocations to the County for the Application.
18.M.
G. HCD requires this Agreement to set forth the agreed upon governance structure and terms of operation required to implement the PLHA program, including but not limited to, the expectations and responsibilities of the Parties, legal and financial terms, and community engagement and decision-making processes.
H. The Parties desire to enter into an Agreement as hereinafter set forth in order to establish a collaborative stakeholder structure for matters pertaining to the City’s Allocations.
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Section 1. DEFINITIONS.
1.1 General. The definitions set forth in the above recitals, in the PLHA Guidelines, and otherwise indicated in parenthesis hereafter, shall apply to this Agreement.
1.2 PLHA. “PLHA” shall mean the Permanent Local Housing Allocation.
1.3 PLHA Guidelines. “PLHA Guidelines” shall mean the HCD 2026 PLHA Final Guidelines.
1.4 Application. “Application” shall mean the PLHA Formula Allocation 2026 Application for funding submitted by County.
1.5 Bi-monthly. “Bi-monthly” shall mean every other month.
1.6 Budget. “Budget” shall mean the budget for a particular housing development project.
1.7 Budget Report. “Budget Report” shall mean the report containing the budget for a particular Housing development project, which breaks down cost by task and lien item.
1.8 Close-Out Report. “Close-Out Report” shall mean the report submitted to the HCD at the conclusion of an individual Housing development project.
1.9 Term. “Term” shall mean the term of the PLHA Program Agreement.
1.10 Applicant. “Applicant” shall mean the County of Riverside.
1.11 Performance Period. “Performance Period” shall mean the period of time beginning immediately upon the completion of a Housing development project and ending upon a date determined by the County, during which City will be required to complete additional Indicator Tracking.
1.12 Subcontractor. “Subcontractor” shall mean any third party used by the Parties to perform any work in furtherance of a Housing development project.
18.M.
1.13 PLHA Standard Agreement. “PLHA Standard Agreement” shall mean the agreement entered into by and between the County and the HCD.
Section 2. INCORPORATION AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF TERMS.
2.1 Incorporation. The Parties intend that this Agreement shall conform to and satisfy all requirements of the PLHA Guidelines and the PLHA Standard Agreement. The County’s performance shall be conducted in accordance with the PLHA Standard Agreement, the PLHA Guidelines, and this Agreement (hereafter collectively the “Performance Terms”).
2.2 Acknowledgement. Each Party acknowledges that it has reviewed the Performance Terms and the Application, and is fully committed to the goals and requirements of each.
Section 3. PURPOSE AND GOALS.
3.1 Purpose. The purpose of this Agreement is to formalize the partnership and understanding between the Parties and to set forth the terms by which the Parties will manage, coordinate, and administer PLHA funding-related activities within the City’s boundaries, including the following:
a. Implementing activities, programs, strategies, and projects as set forth in the PLHA Standard Agreement;
b. Promoting the execution of objectives and goals set forth in the PLHA Standard Agreement;
c. Providing a platform for community engagement and input into implementation of activities related to PLHA funding; and
d. Performing such other functions as may be deemed necessary and appropriate to meet the objectives of this Agreement.
3.2 Goals. Each Party affirms that the PLHA program is designed to provide a permanent source of funding to all local governments in California to help cities and counties implement plans to increase the affordable housing stock.
Section 4. RESPONSIBILITIES OF ALL PARTIES.
4.1 Mutual Cooperation. The Parties recognize that they have complementary expertise and common goals and interests. The Parties shall endeavor to cooperate, work together, and share knowledge, expertise, and best practices with regards to the Application and shall commit to working collaboratively with one another and with community stakeholders throughout the
18.M.
Term. The Parties hereto agree that they will each provide such information and documentation as is reasonably necessary to fulfill the intent of this Agreement and make diligent efforts to respond to inquiries and requests for information from the other Party. The Parties agree to provide all project-related information and documents as requested by the other Party, or the State of California, including all reporting-related documentation.
4.2 Leveraging of Available Funds. The Parties shall make good faith efforts, as appropriate, to leverage available federal, state, local, and private funds, and to assist the other Party in leveraging available federal, state, local, and private funds, to support development and construction of affordable housing.
4.3 Communication. The Parties shall commit to the principle of good communication, especially when one’s work may have some bearing on the responsibilities of the other. The Parties shall seek to alert each other as soon as practical to relevant developments with regards to the PLHA Program and its execution. The Parties shall also ensure that it is clear who the appropriate contacts are for particular matters and that contact details are kept up to date.
Section 5. COUNTY – ROLE AND RESPONSIBILITIES.
5.1 Applicant and Administering Local Government. County shall be the Applicant and Administering Local Government and shall execute the PLHA Standard Agreement, carry out all responsibilities as described in the Performance Terms, and work closely with HCD throughout the implementation of the Application. County commits to all duties and responsibilities corresponding to the Applicant’s role under the PLHA Plan for the length of the Term. County acknowledges that it:
a. Has reviewed the FY2026 PLHA Program NOFA, Final Guidelines, and related guidance from HCD;
b. Has participated in the preparation of the Application seeking funding for the following eligible activities:
i. §301(a)(1) – Rental Activities- The payment of predevelopment, development, acquisition, rehabilitation, preservation costs, necessary operating subsidies, or any combination thereof, for Multifamily Housing. ii. §301(a)(2) – Affordable Owner-Occupied Workforce Housing ActivitiesHomeownership opportunities, including, but not limited to, down payment assistance.
c. Is fully committed to the goals and requirements of the NOFA, the Application, the funding requirements, and this Agreement.
d. County agrees to expend no less than the amount allocated to the Delegating Local Government in its respective jurisdiction, in accordance to PLHA Guidelines over the span of the Term of this Agreement. The City’s Allocations
18.M.
are anticipated to be in the funding amount of One Million Seven Hundred SixtyFive Thousand Nine Hundred Fifty-Six dollars ($1,765,956).
5.2 Administration. County shall serve as the administrator of the City’s Allocations, including but not limited to, operating a down payment assistance program, promoting development of affordable housing inside the City, and annual reporting due to HCD. The County shall ensure compliance with all accounting, disbursement, recordkeeping, and all other compliance requirements with respect to the PLHA Standard Agreement.
5.3 Financial Support. County shall leverage as appropriate, or assist in leveraging, available federal, state, local, and private funds as available to support integrated strategic investment for the development of affordable housing developments in the City.
5.4 Oversight of Implementation. County shall supervise and coordinate the implementation of activities related to the PLHA Program, including development of affordable housing, down payment assistance program, long term compliance monitoring, and loan servicing of all PLHA loans.
5.5 Reporting. County shall be responsible for any and all required reports, including but not limited to Progress Reports, Indicator Reports, Budget Reports, and Close-Out Reports.
Section 6. TERM AND TERMINATION.
6.1 Term. This Agreement shall become effective as of the date on which the last Party executes this Agreement (“Effective Date”). The Term shall commence on the Effective Date and continue for five (5) years thereafter, unless terminated earlier or otherwise extended by a written amendment to this Agreement.
6.2 Termination – Convenience. Either Party may terminate this Agreement for convenience upon two (2) years written notice served upon the other Party, stating the extent and effective date of termination.
6.3 Termination – For Cause. Either Party may terminate this Agreement for cause, upon thirty (30) days written notice served upon the other Party, stating the extent and effective date of termination. For cause includes the following:
a. Default in which the alleged defaulting Party refuses or fails to comply with the terms of this Agreement or fails to make progress that may endanger performance and does not immediately cure such failure;
6.4 Termination – No Funding / Dishonesty or Material Breach. This Agreement shall automatically terminate if the Delegating Local Government is not allocated funding based on the Application. The Delegating Local Government’s rights under this Agreement shall also terminate upon dishonesty or a willful or material breach of this Agreement by the Delegating
18.M.
Local Government; or in the event of Delegating Local Government’s unwillingness or inability for any reason whatsoever to perform the terms of this Agreement.
6.5 The rights and remedies provided in this section shall not be exclusive and are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or this Agreement.
Section 7. INDEMNIFICATION.
7.1 City shall indemnify and hold harmless the County of Riverside, its Agencies, Districts, Special Districts and Departments, their respective directors, officers, Board of Supervisors, elected and appointed officials, employees, agents and representatives (individually and collectively hereinafter referred to as “County Indemnitees”) from any liability, action, claim or damage whatsoever, based or asserted upon any services of City, its officers, employees, subcontractors, agents or representatives arising out of or in any way relating to this Agreement, including but not limited to property damage, bodily injury, or death or any other element of any kind or nature. City shall defend the County Indemnitees at its sole expense including all costs and fees (including, but not limited, to attorney fees, cost of investigation, defense and settlements or awards) in any claim or action based upon such acts, omissions or services.
7.2 With respect to any action or claim subject to indemnification herein by City, City shall, at their sole cost, have the right to use counsel of their own choice and shall have the right to adjust, settle, or compromise any such action or claim without the prior consent of County; provided, however, that any such adjustment, settlement or compromise in no manner whatsoever limits or circumscribes City indemnification to County Indemnitees as set forth herein.
7.3 City’s obligation hereunder shall be satisfied when City has provided to County the appropriate form of dismissal relieving County from any liability for the action or claim involved.
7.4 The specified insurance limits required in this Agreement shall in no way limit or circumscribe City’s obligations to indemnify and hold harmless the County Indemnitees herein from third party claims.
Section 8. EFFECT OF THIS AGREEMENT.
8.1 Parties acknowledge and agree that nothing contained in this Agreement shall be deemed a covenant, promise, or commitment by the County to enter into any other agreement on any particular terms or conditions, in furtherance of any the Housing development projects in the Application if the Delegating Local Government is not selected for PLHA funding. The Delegating Local Government further understands and agrees that the State of California retains the ultimate discretion to approve or deny PLHA funding. Each Party’s execution of this Agreement is merely an agreement to the terms of the collaborative stakeholder structure, contingent upon PLHA Program funding and award.
18.M.
8.2 Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed to require, or have the effect of requiring, the County to take any action inconsistent with any applicable law, rule or regulation which governs the County’s actions.
Section 9. NON-DISCRIMINATION.
The Parties shall not be discriminate in the provision of services, allocation of benefits, accommodation in facilities, or employment of personnel on the basis of ethnic group identification, race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical handicap, medical condition, marital status or sex in the performance of this Agreement; and, to the extent they shall be found to be applicable hereto, shall comply with the provisions of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (Gov. Code 12900 et. seq), the Federal Civil Rights Act of 1964 (P.L. 88-352), the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. S1210 et seq.) and all other applicable laws or regulations.
Section 10. DISPUTES.
The Parties agree that before any Party commences any legal or equitable action, action for declaratory relief, suit, proceeding, or arbitration regarding this Agreement, that the Parties shall first submit the dispute to mediation through a mutually acceptable professional mediator in Riverside County. Each Party shall bear its own expenses and costs associated with the mediation. Parties shall share the cost of a mediator equally.
Section 11. MISCELLANEOUS.
11.1 Notices. Any notices or reports relating to this Agreement, and any request, demand, statement or other communication required or permitted hereunder shall be in writing to the addresses set forth on the signature pages, and shall be deemed to have been received on (a) the day of delivery, if delivered by hand during regular business hours or by confirmed facsimile during regular business hours; or (b) on the third business day following deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid.
11.2 No Delegation or Assignment. City shall not delegate or assign any interest in this Agreement, whether by operation of law or otherwise, without the prior written consent of County. Any attempt to delegate or assign any interest herein shall be deemed void and of no force or effect.
11.3 Waivers. Any waiver by County of any breach of any one or more terms of this Agreement shall not be construed to be a waiver of any subsequent or other breach of the same or of any other term of this Agreement. Failure on the part of County to require exact, full, and complete compliance with any terms of this Agreement shall not be construed as in any manner changing the terms or preventing County from enforcement of the terms of this Agreement.
18.M.
11.4 Conflict of Interest. No member, official or employee of the Parties shall have any personal interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement nor shall any such member, official or employee participate in any decision relating to this Agreement which affects his or her personal interest or the interests of any corporation, partnership or association in which he or she is directly or indirectly interested.
11.5 Governing Law. This Agreement and any dispute arising hereunder shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California.
11.6 Venue. Any legal action related to the performance or interpretation of this Agreement shall be filed only in the Superior Court in Riverside County, California, and the Parties waive any provision of law providing for a change of venue to another location. In the event any provision in this Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, the remaining provisions will nevertheless continue in full force without being impaired or invalidated in any way.
11.7 No Third-Party Beneficiaries. This Agreement is made and entered into for the sole protection and benefit of the Parties hereto and shall not create any rights in any third Parties.
No other person or entity shall have any right of action based upon the provisions of this Agreement.
11.8 Section Headings. The Section headings herein are for the convenience of the Parties only and shall not be deemed to govern, limit, modify or in any manner affect the scope, meaning or intent of the provisions or language of this Agreement.
11.9 Compliance with Laws and Regulations; Legal Authority. By executing this Agreement, the Parties agree to comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, regulations and ordinances. Nothing in this Agreement binds the Parties to perform any action that is beyond its legal authority.
11.10 Authority. The persons executing this Agreement or exhibits attached hereto on behalf of the Parties to this Agreement hereby warrant and represent that they have the authority to execute this Agreement and warrant and represent that they have the authority to bind the respective Parties to this Agreement to the performance of its obligations hereunder.
11.11 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be an original, but all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument.
11.12 Entire Agreement. This Agreement, including all exhibits and attachments hereto, is intended by the Parties hereto as a final expression of their understanding with respect to the subject matter hereof and as a complete and exclusive statement of the terms and conditions thereof and supersedes any and all prior and contemporaneous agreements and understandings, oral or written, in connection therewith. Any amendments to or clarification of this Agreement shall be in writing and acknowledged by all Parties to this Agreement.
18.M.
[REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK]
[SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]
18.M.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representatives on the dates set forth below.
THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE,
a political subdivision of the State of
California, through the County of Riverside
Department of Housing and Workforce
Solutions
By:_____________________________
Heidi Marshall,
Director
Dated:__________________________
Address:
County of Riverside
Department of Housing and Workforce
Solutions
Attention: Juan Garcia, Deputy Director
3403 10th Street, Suite 300
Riverside, CA 92501
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
MINH C. TRAN,
County Counsel
By:
Deputy County Counsel
THE CITY OF HEMET, a California
municipal corporation
By:_____________________________
Noah Rau
City Manager
Dated:__________________________
Address:
City of Hemet
Attn: City Manager
445 E. Florida Avenue
Hemet, CA 92543
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
By:
City Attorney
18.M.
0t
ENGAGE.
HOUSING AND
WORKFORCE
SOLUTIONS
ENCOURAGE. EQUIP.
August 4, 2026
Noah Rau, City Manager
445 E. Florida Avenue
Hemet, CA 92543
SUBJECT: Continued Participation Under County of Riverside's Entitlement Local Government Designation; Delegating County of Riverside to Apply for and Administer Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) Program Allocation through the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD); Allocation Years 2024, 2025, 2026, 2027 and 2028 Dear City Manager:
On July 17, 2026, the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) released its Notice of Funding Availability for Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) Program Cycle 2 (CY 2024-2028) Formula Allocations. The County of Riverside invites the City of Hemet to continue participating in the County's Entitlement Local Government designation so we can use our collective PLHA resources to maximize the housing opportunities throughout Riverside County. Our partnership during the previous five-year cycle allowed participating cities to support affordable housing initiatives and expand access to homeownership opportunities.
Through our collaboration during the previous five-year cycle, we achieved significant impacts for many of our residents.
Continued Participation:
By continuing to participate under the County of Riverside's Entitlement Local Government designation, the City of Hemet would authorize the County to apply for and administer its PLHA allocation on the City's behalf. The County will continue to manage all program administration, including but not limited to application submission, reporting requirements, loan servicing, long-term affordability monitoring, and regulatory compliance. Pooling funding enables local PLHA funds to be leveraged with those of other participating jurisdictions, creating the opportunity to finance larger and more impactful housing projects than individual allocations could typically support. This collaborative approach also reduces the administrative burden on participating cities while ensuring compliance with HCD requirements. The County intends to allocate a percentage of the 3403 Tenth Street, Suite 300 I Riverside, CA 92501 I FAX: (951) 374-30981 Phone: (951) 955-1161
18.M.
18.M.
Program Year Total Allocation Admin 5%
2019 $ 402,536.00 $ 20,126.80
Awarded Committed Uncommitted
New Construction $ 305,927.36 $ 305,927.36 $ -
First Time Home Buyer $ 76,481.84 $ 76,481.84 $ -
Program Year Total Allocation Admin 5%
2020 $ 625,665.00 $ 31,283.25
Activity Awarded Committed Uncommitted
New Construction $ 475,505.40 $ 475,505.40
First Time Home Buyer $ 118,876.35 $ 118,876.35 $ -
Program Year Total Allocation Admin 5%
2021 $ 688,525.00 $ 34,426.25
Awarded Committed Uncommitted
New Construction $ 523,279.00 $ 523,279.00 $ -
First Time Home Buyer $ 130,819.75 $ 130,819.75 $ -
Program Year Total Allocation Admin 5%
2022 $ 345,090.00 $ 17,254.50
Awarded Committed Uncommitted
New Construction $ 262,268.40 $ 262,268.40 $ -
First Time Home Buyer $ 65,567.10 $ 65,567.10 $ -
Program Year Total Allocation Admin 5%
2023 $ 264,500.00 $ 13,225.00
Awarded Committed Uncommitted
New Construction $ 201,020.00 $ 201,020.00 $ -
First Time Home Buyer $ 50,255.00 $ 7,254.96 $ 43,000.04 Grand Totals Committed Uncommited
New Construction $ 1,768,000.16 $ -
First Time Home Buyer $ 399,000.00 $ 43,000.04
County of Riverside, Housing and Workforce Solutions
PLHA Allocation for the City of Hemet
18.M.
Hemet
PLHA funds 2019-2023
Name Program Down Payment
Assistance City Street Address ZipCode
Purchase
Price
Zavaleta, Anthony PLHA $ 87,000.00 Hemet 24957 Aquatic Way 92544 $ 450,000.00 Leomiti, Falolo PLHA $ 78,000.00 Hemet 2160 Glenwood Ave 92544 $ 390,000.00 Medina, Maria Lourdes PLHA $ 65,000.00 Hemet 561 Kit Avenue 92544 $ 325,000.00 Sanchez, Indian & Ruelas, Nohe PLHA $ 89,000.00 Hemet 44366 Alsace Lane 92544 $ 445,000.00 Ballem, Daniel PLHA $ 80,000.00 Hemet 175 Mosport St 92544 $ 400,000.00 PLHA Total Assisted 399,000.00
Carmen Lorena Orellano Ruiz OHOP $ 100,000.00 Hemet 1097 N State #79 92543 $ 100,000.00 Mosqueda, Erick ARPA $ 90,000.00 Hemet 44307 Gallipoli Pl 92544 $ 450,000.00 Knowlden, Jacquitta ARPA $ 65,000.00 Hemet 434 King Ct 92543 $ 325,000.00 Llanos, Leslie ARPA $ 84,000.00 Hemet 42994 Victorian Dr 92544 $ 420,000.00 Devestel, Mona ARPA $ 100,000.00 Hemet 2095 Sonoran Blue Rd 92545 $ 525,000.00 Ponder, Garret ARPA $ 82,000.00 Hemet 3617 Anchorage St 92545 $ 430,000.00 Midanda, Thomas ARPA $ 80,000.00 Hemet 1115 Magnolica Circle 92543 $ 400,000.00 George, Taneisha ARPA $ 96,000.00 Hemet 2042 Lagoon Ct 92545 $ 480,000.00 Sougu, Ripu ARPA $ 60,000.00 Hemet 575 Farmstead Ave 92543 $ 450,000.00 Total 757,000.00
Name Program County Invested City Street Address Zip
Code
Total Project
Invested
PBVs Est $ over 20
yrs
PBVs Total
Units
Closing
Status
Palm Villas At State PLHA $ 5,500,000.00 Hemet 785 N State St 92543 $69,163,138.00 $ 14,891,520.00 28 109 6/15/2027 Total 5,500,000.00
$ 1,156,000.00
$ 1,386,577.28
$ 5,500,000.00
Hemet Report 2019 to Present
Closed
08/08/2023
12/16/2022
12/17/2024
11/5/2024
5/2/2025
6/2/2025
7/1/2025
7/11/2025
12/12/2024
Down Payment Assistance
New Construction
Home Repair
01/04/2023
05/30/2023
03/21/2023
6/13/2025
11/5/2025
18.M.
File Number HRP Participant
Street
Address City
Total Project
Cost Completion
HRP5.24-06 Guadalupe Cárdenas 1417 Cabrillo Dr Hemet 38,780 1/24/2025 HRP5.24-07 Cecilia Morphis 1895 W. Devonshire Ave, Sp. 77 Hemet 50,000 1/08/2025 HRP5.24-08 Vaughn Brown 302 Ancla Ln Hemet 49,618 1/08/2025 HRP5.24-10 John Kellow 4400 W Florida Ave, Sp. 55 Hemet 43,959 3/20/2025 HRP5.24-11 Janis Simon 1700 S. State St, Sp. 4 Hemet 47,440 4/03/2025 HRP5.24-14 Karen Howard 5001 W Florida Ave, Spc. 737 Hemet 21,821 1/24/2025 HRP5.24-20 Pamela Martin 1700 S. State Street, Sp. 24 Hemet 40,885 06/18/2025 HRP5.24-22 Deborah Hooks 5001 W Florida Ave., Sp. 505 Hemet 48,627 07/08/2025 HRP5VM.25-08 Winifred Mellor 5001 W. Florida Ave. Sp. 563 Hemet 49,802 03/06/2026 HRP5VM.25-09 Susanna Schuler 5001 W. Florida Ave, Sp.. 235 Hemet 46,099 03/24/2026 HRP5VM.25-10 Darwyn Vernon 1475 Santa Susana Dr Hemet 46,797 11/20/2025 HRP5VM.25-11 Donald Catozza 601 N Kirby St., Sp. 38 Hemet 49,245 10/16/2025 HRP5VM.25-13 Leilani Macias 1310 W. Johnston Ave. Hemet 48,762 11/20/2025 HRP5VM.25-14 Manuel Nogueira 800 San Rafel Dr. Hemet 49,337 02/26/2026 HRP5VM.25-19 Louise Strunk 610 N Kirby St., Sp. 334 Hemet 49,715 11/20/2025 HRP5VM.25-20 Gildardo Martinez & Joanne Harvey611 N Kirby St., Sp. 329 Hemet 24,992 10/16/2025 HRP5GE.25-22 Carol Porter 5001 W. Florida Ave. Sp. 26 Hemet 46,463 12/10/2025 HRP5GE.25-28 Maria Sotelo 318 Ancla Ln. Hemet 49,363 10/14/2025 HRP5GE.25-29 Madilyn Patterson 1311 Cordova Dr. Hemet 47,119 01/27/2026 HRP5GE.25-30 Jill Van Cleave 5001 W. Florida Ave. Sp. 455 Hemet 34,711 12/22/2025 HRP5VM.25-31 Brian Withey 5001 W. Florida Ave. Sp. 579 Hemet 34,016 12/04/2025 HRP5VM25-32 George Mentis 5001 W. Florida Ave. Sp. 599 Hemet 49,977 12/30/2025 HRP5VM25-33 Alvin & Natalie Kindberg 5001 W. Florida Ave. Sp. 592 Hemet 39,257 09/03/2025 HRP5DS.25-34 Carole Shoopman 5001 W Florida Ave., Sp. 358 Hemet 41,308 09/17/2025 HRP5DS.25-35 Lori Bergst 5001 W Florida Ave., Sp. 583 Hemet 46,612 02/19/2026 HRP5DS.25-36 Maria Quesada 5001 W Florida Ave., Sp. 575 Hemet 49,812 10/07/2025 HRP5GE.25-37 Cynthia Vonwald 5001 W. Florida Ave. Sp. 619 Hemet 21,289 08/11/2025 HRP5GE.25-38 Cary Matz 5001 W. Florida Ave. Sp. 634 Hemet 49,969 12/04/2025 HRP5GE.25-39 Montye Greer 5001 W. Florida Ave. Sp. 710 Hemet 48,615 TBD HRP5GE.25-40 Joanne Acuna 5001 W. Florida Ave. Sp. 244 Hemet 42,003 09/17/2025 HRP5GE.25-41 Deni Mazingo 238 Jelly Way Hemet 30,690 TBD HRP5GE.25-43 Donnie Beart 5001 W. Florida Ave. Sp. 107 Hemet 49,497 12/17/2025 HRP Total Assisted $ 1,386,577.28
18.M.
City of Hemet
City Council Meeting
STAFF REPORT
Meeting: City Council Meeting - Sep 08 2026
Department: Administration
Submitted by: Noah Rau, Interim City Manager
Jennifer Cortes, Communications and Events Coordinator; ☐ Receive and File ☒ Consent Calendar ☐ Business Item ☐ Public Hearing TITLE:
A Resolution Considering a Proposed Amendment to the City of Hemet Veterans Memorial Etching Policy and Procedure
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
It is respectfully recommended that the City Council adopt the following resolution (Attachment No. 1):
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-156 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HEMET, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY OF HEMET VETERANS
MEMORIAL ETCHING POLICY AS RECOMMENDED BY THE VETERANS AD-HOC COMMITTEE BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
At the regular City Council Meeting on September 12, 2023 the Council approved language amendments to the Veterans Memorial Procedure Policy as recommended by the City’s Veterans AdHoc Committee, made up of Mayor Pro Tem Joe Males and Council Member Jackie Peterson.
The Veterans Ad-Hoc Committee has proposed additional language amendments to the City of Hemet Veterans Memorial Etching Policy for consideration.
DISCUSSION:
The Veteran Ad-Hoc Committee’s edits are attached in redline and clean versions to this report.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION:
At the regular City Council Meeting on September 12, 2023 the Council approved language amendments to the Veterans Memorial Procedure Policy as recommended by the City’s Veterans AdHoc Committee.
STRATEGIC PLAN INTEGRATION:
18.N.
GOAL THREE: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
To connect and participate in a constant dialogue between members of the community, City staff, and elected officials to promote togetherness and positivity.
Objective 1: Deliver messaging to the Community that connects, is consistent, and relevant.
Objective 2: Increase transparency for the public.
Objective 3: Increase the community's pride within the City.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
ATTACHMENT(S):
Attachment No. 1: Resolution No. 2026-156
Attachment No. 2_ Amended Hemet Gibbel Memorial Procedure - Redlined Version Attachment No. 3: Amended Hemet Gibbel Memorial Procedure - Clean Version
18.N.
CITY OF HEMET RESOLUTION NO. 2026-156 1
CITY OF HEMET
HEMET, CALIFORNIA
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-156
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF HEMET, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AMENDMENTS
TO THE CITY OF HEMET VETERANS MEMORIAL
ETCHING POLICY AS RECOMMENDED BY THE
VETERANS AD-HOC COMMITTEE
The City Council of the City of Hemet, California (hereafter referred to as the “City Council”) does resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, the City of Hemet has established a Veterans Memorial Etching Policy to provide procedures for consideration of names proposed for addition to the Veterans Memorial; and
WHEREAS, at its regular meeting on September 12, 2023, the City Council approved language amendments to the Veterans Memorial Etching Policy as recommended by the City’s Veterans Ad-Hoc Committee, consisting of Mayor Pro Tem Joe Males and Council Member Jackie Peterson ; and
WHEREAS, the Veterans Ad-Hoc Committee has proposed additional language amendments to the City of Hemet Veterans Memorial Etching Policy for consideration by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendments are presented in redline and clean versions as Attachment Nos. 1 and 2 to the accompanying staff report; and
18.N.
CITY OF HEMET RESOLUTION NO. 2026-156 1
WHEREAS, the Veterans Ad-Hoc Committee recommends that the City Council approve the proposed language amendments to the City of Hemet Veterans Memorial Etching Policy; and
WHEREAS, approval of the proposed amendments supports Goal Three of the City’s Strategic Plan, Community Engagement.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HEMET FINDS, DETERMINES, ORDERS AND RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The recitals set forth above are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference.
SECTION 2. The City Council hereby approves the proposed language amendments to the City of Hemet Veterans Memorial Etching Policy, as recommended by the Veterans Ad-Hoc Committee and reflected in Attachment Nos. 1 and 2 to the accompanying staff report.
SECTION 3. The City Council authorizes City Staff to implement the approved amendments to the City of Hemet Veterans Memorial Etching Policy. .
SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE - This Resolution shall become effective on September 8, 2026.
18.N.
CITY OF HEMET RESOLUTION NO. 2026-156 1
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of September, 2026.
___________________________
Linda Krupa, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
________________________ __________________________
Steven Graham Pacifico, City Attorney Rosalia A. Butler, MMC, City Clerk
18.N.
CITY OF HEMET RESOLUTION NO. 2026-156 1
State of California )
County of Riverside )
City of Hemet )
I, Rosalia A. Butler, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Hemet, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted by the Hemet City Council on the 8th day of September, 2026, and was passed by the following vote:
AYES: Council Members:
NOES: Council Members:
ABSTAIN: Council Members:
ABSENT: Council Members:
_____________________________
Rosalia A. Butler, MMC, City Clerk
18.N.
PROPOSED AMENDED LANGUAGE
Hemet Gibbel Park Veterans Memorial
Etching Program
Policy and Procedures
The War Memorial at Gibbel Park honors the men and women of Hemet who are no longer with us, who courageously served their country during wartime by etching their names on the stone memorial slabs. These fallen heroes fought to preserve the freedoms Americans cherish.
Etching Details
The policy of etching is indicated below:
• Names can be etched up to twice a year in advance of the Memorial/Veterans Day holidays. • The number of names etched each year and frequency will be determined by fiscal availability. • The cost will be supported by the City with a sponsorship option of local organizations and/or families and individuals.
Publication and Advertisement
In order to publicize this program opportunity, the City will advertise through the following avenues:
• Newspaper
• Chamber of Commerce
• City communication and Social Media platforms
• Flyers
• Community events
Criteria for Eligibility
The criteria was developed to provide guidance to the Veterans Memorial Ad-Hoc Committee when reviewing candidates for inclusion at the Memorial. The City wishes to honor the integrity of the Memorial by carefully applying the criteria, however, in special cases that do not categorically conform to the requirements, such situations will be thoroughly reviewed on a case-by-case basis and decided upon by the Veterans Memorial Ad-Hoc Committee.
1. To be eligible for recognition through the Veterans Memorial at Gibbel Park, the deceased must have lived in the City of Hemet during some part of his/her life. Eligible honorees include, but are not limited to, those who identified Hemet as their “Hometown of Record.” In addition, he/she must have served in a war zone/conflict
during his/her military career or was deemed Missing in Action (MIA) or died directly from injuries sustained in combat Killed in Action (KIA) during wartime from World War I to present. In addition, if cause of death was attributed to a covered condition under the PACT Act, the service member is eligible.
18.N.
PROPOSED AMENDED LANGUAGE
a. Killed in Action (KIA) is a casualty classification generally used by militaries to describe the deaths of their own forces at the hands of hostile forces. Per the United States Department of Defense (DOD), those declared KIA need not have fired their weapons, but have been killed due to hostile attack. b. Missing in Action (MIA) – The DOD conducts an ongoing effort to find and identify the remains of those servicemen classified as MIA during wartime. If the remains of an MIA serviceperson have been identified by the DOD, they are eligible for inclusion at the Memorial. c. Death Caused by Latent Injuries – I.E. Pact Act illnesses that resulted from exposure to toxic chemicals, air pollutants, radiation, and warfare agents. However, the individual must have been discharged honorably, generally or medically when ending his/her military career.
Proof of Eligibility
The following are acceptable proofs of eligibility for Hemet residency, discharge, and/or military KIA or MIA designations. Other proof of eligibility may be acceptable upon review by the Committee.
Military Designations
Copies of at least two of the following:
• Copy of the “Certified Report of Incident,” issued by the military • Telegram/Letter
• Newspaper Article
• Death Certificate
• History Book
• Newspaper/Internet Obituary
• Department of Defense Data (DD-214 form)
• Internet or Print Records from Museums, Libraries, Military or Church Organizations (such as the National Personnel Records Center and the Department of Defense) Proof of Hemet Residency
A copy of at least one of the following is required to prove that the deceased lived in Hemet:
• Birth Certificate
• Death Certificate
• Passport
• Newspaper Birth Announcement
• Hospital Records
• California Driver’s License/California Identification Card • Certified Home of Record/Enlistment Paperwork
• Hemet Private or Public School Records/Identification • City Records
• American Legion Post 53 Membership
• School Yearbooks
Application Process
Applicant to submit the following preceding information/documents of the deceased;. • City staff will collect applications throughout the year in concert with American Legion Post 53.
18.N.
PROPOSED AMENDED LANGUAGE
• Applications may be submitted up to at least three months prior to Memorial Day/Veterans Day to be considered for the upcoming holiday.
• Staff will collect a list of qualified deceased veterans. • The list will be presented to the Veterans Memorial Ad-Hoc Committee to make their recommended selections.
• Staff will notify American Legion Post 53 of the vetted list to see if they would like to provide comments during the staff report presentation.
• The Veterans Memorial Ad-Hoc Committee's list of recommendations will be presented to the City Council during a City Council meeting for discussion and to determine final selections.
18.N.
PROPOSED AMENDED LANGUAGE – CLEAN VERSION
Hemet Gibbel Park Veterans Memorial
Etching Program
Policy and Procedures
The War Memorial at Gibbel Park honors the men and women of Hemet who are no longer with us, who courageously served their country during wartime by etching their names on the stone memorial slabs. These fallen heroes fought to preserve the freedoms Americans cherish.
Etching Details
The policy of etching is indicated below:
• Names can be etched in advance of Veterans Day holidays. • The number of names etched each year and frequency will be determined by fiscal availability. • The cost will be supported by the City with a sponsorship option of local organizations and/or families and individuals.
Publication and Advertisement
In order to publicize this program opportunity, the City will advertise through the following avenues:
• Newspaper
• Chamber of Commerce
• City communication and Social Media platforms
• Flyers
• Community events
Criteria for Eligibility
The criteria was developed to provide guidance to the Veterans Memorial Ad-Hoc Committee when reviewing candidates for inclusion at the Memorial. The City wishes to honor the integrity of the Memorial by carefully applying the criteria, however, in special cases that do not categorically conform to the requirements, such situations will be thoroughly reviewed on a case-by-case basis and decided upon by the Veterans Memorial Ad-Hoc Committee.
1. To be eligible for recognition through the Veterans Memorial at Gibbel Park, the deceased must have lived in the City of Hemet during some part of his/her life. Eligible honorees include, but are not limited to, those who identified Hemet as their “Hometown of Record.” In addition, he/she must have served in a war zone/conflict during his/her military career or was deemed Missing in Action (MIA) or died directly from injuries sustained in combat Killed in Action (KIA) during wartime from World War I to present. In addition, if cause of death was attributed to a covered condition under the PACT Act, the service member is eligible. a. Killed in Action (KIA) is a casualty classification generally used by militaries to describe the deaths of their own forces at the hands of hostile forces. Per the United States Department of Defense (DOD), those declared KIA need not have fired their weapons, but have been killed due to hostile attack.
18.N.
PROPOSED AMENDED LANGUAGE – CLEAN VERSION
b. Missing in Action (MIA) – The DOD conducts an ongoing effort to find and identify the remains of those servicemen classified as MIA during wartime. If the remains of an MIA serviceperson have been identified by the DOD, they are eligible for inclusion at the Memorial. c. Death Caused by Latent Injuries – I.E. Pact Act illnesses that resulted from exposure to toxic chemicals, air pollutants, radiation, and warfare agents. However, the individual must have been discharged honorably, generally or medically when ending his/her military career.
Proof of Eligibility
The following are acceptable proofs of eligibility for Hemet residency, discharge, and/or military KIA or MIA designations. Other proof of eligibility may be acceptable upon review by the Committee.
Military Designations
Copies of at least two of the following:
• Copy of the “Certified Report of Incident,” issued by the military • Telegram/Letter
• Newspaper Article
• Death Certificate
• History Book
• Newspaper/Internet Obituary
• Department of Defense Data (DD-214 form)
• Internet or Print Records from Museums, Libraries, Military or Church Organizations (such as the National Personnel Records Center and the Department of Defense) Proof of Hemet Residency
A copy of at least one of the following is required to prove that the deceased lived in Hemet:
• Birth Certificate
• Death Certificate
• Passport
• Newspaper Birth Announcement
• Hospital Records
• California Driver’s License/California Identification Card • Certified Home of Record/Enlistment Paperwork
• Hemet Private or Public School Records/Identification • City Records
• American Legion Post 53 Membership
• School Yearbooks
Application Process
Applicant to submit the preceding information/documents of the deceased. • City staff will collect applications throughout the year in concert with American Legion Post 53. • Applications may be submitted up to at least three months prior to Veterans Day to be considered for the upcoming holiday.
• Staff will collect a list of qualified deceased veterans.
18.N.
PROPOSED AMENDED LANGUAGE – CLEAN VERSION
• The list will be presented to the Veterans Memorial Ad-Hoc Committee to make their recommended selections.
• Staff will notify American Legion Post 53 of the vetted list to see if they would like to provide comments during the staff report presentation.
• The Veterans Memorial Ad-Hoc Committee's list of recommendations will be presented to the City Council during a City Council meeting for discussion and to determine final selections.
18.N.
City of Hemet
City Council Meeting
STAFF REPORT
Meeting: City Council Meeting - Sep 08 2026
Department: Administration
Submitted by: Noah Rau, Interim City Manager
Jennifer Cortes, Communications and Events Coordinator; ☐ Receive and File ☒ Consent Calendar ☐ Business Item ☐ Public Hearing TITLE:
A Reslution Approving to Add the Names of Nicolas Chavez Barela and Oliver Wayne Mouat to the Hemet Veterans Memorial at Gibbel Park
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
It is respectfully recommended that the City Council:
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-157 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HEMET, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ADDITION OF THE NAMES OF NICOLAS CHAVEZ
BARELA AND OLIVER WAYNE MOUAT TO THE HEMET VETERANS MEMORIAL AT GIBBEL PARK
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The Hemet Veterans Memorial at Gibbel Park serves as a place of honor and remembrance for veterans and their service to the United States. In 2023, the City Council approved a policy and procedure establishing a process for considering requests to add names to the Memorial.
In accordance with this process, the Veterans Memorial Ad-Hoc Committee recommends that the City Council approve the addition of Nicolas Chavez Barela and Oliver Wayne Mouat to the Hemet Veterans Memorial. Both veterans passed away in 2026 following complications from health conditions associated with military toxic exposures, including conditions recognized by the U.S.
Department of Veterans Affairs as presumptively service-connected.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
The Hemet Veterans Memorial at Gibbel Park provides a permanent place for the community to recognize and honor veterans for their service and sacrifice to the United States.
In 2022, the City Council established the Veterans Memorial Ad Hoc Committee, consisting of Council Member Jackie Peterson and Mayor Pro Tem Joe Males, to develop a process for evaluating
18.O.
requests to add names to the stone panels at the Veterans Memorial. In 2023, following the Committee's work, the City Council approved a policy and procedure establishing a formal process and criteria for reviewing and considering names proposed for inclusion on the Memorial.
Consistent with the City Council-approved policy and procedure, the Veterans Memorial Ad Hoc Committee reviewed requests to add the names of Nicolas Chavez Barela and Oliver Wayne Mouat to the Veterans Memorial.
DISCUSSION:
The Veterans Memorial Ad-Hoc Committee is recommending the addition of Nicolas Chavez Barela and Oliver Wayne Mouat to be etched onto the Veterans Memorial at Gibbel Park.
Mr. Barela served in the US Air Force from 1961 to 1985 and, during that time, served in Vietnam, earning an Air Force Commendation Medal, AF Outstanding Unit Award w/1 Device, AF Organizational Excellence Award, AF Good Conduct Medal w/5 Devices, National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, and Humanitarian Service Medal. He was also recognized with an AF Longevity Service Award Ribbon w/4 Devices, NCO Professional Military Educ Grad Ribbon, and a Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon, Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with device, and a Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal.
Nicolas Chavez Barela passed away on June 27, 2026, following complications from health conditions associated with military toxic exposures, including conditions recognized by the U.S.
Department of Veterans Affairs as presumptively service-connected Mr. Mouat served in the U.S. Navy from 1966 to 1970 and, during that time, served in Vietnam, earning an National Defense Medal, Vietnam Service Medal with Two Bronze Stars, Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960-), Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (Korea), Navy Unit Commendation Ribbon, and Navy Meritorious Unit Commendation.
Oliver Wayne Mouat passed away on March 3, 2026, following complications from health conditions associated with military toxic exposures, including conditions recognized by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs as presumptively service-connected
It is the recommendation of the Ad-Hoc Committee to honor Mr. Barelas and Mr. Mouat by etching their names into the stone slab, which will be unveiled at the Veterans Day holiday celebration.
STRATEGIC PLAN INTEGRATION:
GOAL THREE: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
To connect and participate in a constant dialogue between members of the community, City staff, and elected officials to promote togetherness and positivity.
Objective 1: Deliver messaging to the Community that connects, is consistent, and relevant.
Objective 2: Increase transparency for the public.
Objective 3: Increase the community's pride within the City.
FISCAL IMPACT:
18.O.
The estimated cost to etch each name on the Hemet Veterans Memorial is approximately $2,000, for a total estimated cost of $4,000. Funding for this expenditure is available within the adopted Fiscal Year 2026-27 General Fund budget in the Professional Services account (110-04-1201-52710). No additional appropriation is required.
ALTERNATIVE(S):
1. Do not approve the recommended resolution and name etching.
2. Provide alternative direction to the Interim City Manager.
ATTACHMENT(S):
Attachment 1 - Reso. No. 2026-157 Veterans Memorial Name Etching
18.O.
CITY OF HEMET RESOLUTION NO. 2026-157 1
1111
2222
3333
4444
5555
6666
7777
8888
9999
10101010
11111111
12121212
13131313
14141414
15151515
16161616
17171717
18181818
19191919
20202020
21212121
22222222
23232323
24242424
25252525
26262626
27272727
28282828
CITY OF HEMET
HEMET, CALIFORNIA
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-157
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF HEMET, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ADDITION
OF THE NAMES OF NICOLAS CHAVEZ BARELA AND
OLIVER WAYNE MOUAT TO THE HEMET VETERANS
MEMORIAL AT GIBBEL PARK
The City Council of the City of Hemet, California (hereafter referred to as the “City Council”) does resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, the Hemet Veterans Memorial at Gibbel Park serves as a place of honor and remembrance for veterans and their service to the United States; and WHEREAS, in 2022, the City Council formed the Veterans Ad-Hoc Committee, consisting of Council Member Jackie Peterson and Mayor Pro Tem Joe Males, for the purpose of developing a process for the etching of names on the stones at the Gibbel Park Veterans Memorial; and
WHEREAS, in 2023, the City Council approved a policy and procedure to facilitate the consideration of names proposed for addition to the Hemet Veterans Memorial; and
WHEREAS, Nicolas Chavez Barela passed away on June 27, 2026, following complications from health conditions associated with military toxic exposures, including conditions recognized by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs as presumptively service-connected; and
18.O.
CITY OF HEMET RESOLUTION NO. 2026-157 2
1111
2222
3333
4444
5555
6666
7777
8888
9999
10101010
11111111
12121212
13131313
14141414
15151515
16161616
17171717
18181818
19191919
20202020
21212121
22222222
23232323
24242424
25252525
26262626
27272727
28282828
WHEREAS, Oliver Wayne Mouat passed away on March 3, 2026, following complications from health conditions associated with military toxic exposures, including conditions recognized by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs as presumptively service-connected; and
WHEREAS, the Veterans Memorial Ad-Hoc Committee recommends honoring Mr. Barela and Mr. Mouat by etching their names into the stone slab at the Hemet Veterans Memorial at Gibbel Park, with the additions to be unveiled as part of the Veterans Day holiday celebration; and
WHEREAS, the cost to etch each name on the Hemet Veterans Memorial is approximately Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000) and the cost associated with the approved etching will be absorbed by the General Fund’s Fiscal Year 2026-27 budget, Fund 110.04.1201.52710, Professional Services; and
WHEREAS, approval of the requested additions supports the City’s Strategic Plan Goal Three, Community Engagement, including increasing community pride within the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HEMET FINDS, DETERMINES, ORDERS AND RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The recitals set forth above are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference.
SECTION 2. The City Council hereby approves the request to add and etch the names of Nicolas Chavez Barela and Oliver Wayne Mouat on the Hemet Veterans Memorial at Gibbel Park.
18.O.
CITY OF HEMET RESOLUTION NO. 2026-157 3
1111
2222
3333
4444
5555
6666
7777
8888
9999
10101010
11111111
12121212
13131313
14141414
15151515
16161616
17171717
18181818
19191919
20202020
21212121
22222222
23232323
24242424
25252525
26262626
27272727
28282828
SECTION 3. The City Manager, or designee, is authorized and directed to take all actions reasonably necessary to coordinate the etching of the approved names and their unveiling in connection with the Veterans Day holiday celebration.
SECTION 4. The City Council authorizes the expenditure of funds necessary for the approved etching from the General Fund’s Fiscal Year 2026-27 budget, Fund 110.04.1201.52710, Professional Services.
SECTION 5. This Resolution shall become effective on September 8, 2026.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of September, 2026. ___________________________
Linda Krupa, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
________________________ __________________________
Steven Graham Pacifico, City Attorney Rosalia A. Butler, MMC, City Clerk