Agenda packet — Hollister City Council, November 6, 2023 (part 3 of 7)

San Juan Apartments Project
City of Hollister Environmental Initial Study
July 2023
Page | 101

Connections, Inc. The maximum permitted capacity of the landfill is 9,797,000 cubic yards. According to the CalRecycle Solid Waste Facility Permit (35-AA-0001), as of April 30, 2021, John Smith Landfill is estimated to have a remaining capacity of 1,921,000 cy, with a projected closing date of 2032. The proposed project is expected to be fully built out before the closing date. The estimated closure date for the landfill is 2025 at 850 tons per day (tpd) or 2032 at 500 tpd (CalRecycle 2022).

The proposed project would generate approximately 857.1835 pounds per day (ppd) or approximately 0.43 tpd of solid waste. The General Plan FEIR concluded that the increase in solid waste generated by full buildout under the General Plan would not cause the City to exceed the capacities of the operating landfills that serve the City. Compliance with the General Plan policies, existing regulations, and local programs would ensure that the proposed project would not result in si gnificant impacts to landfill capacities to accommodate the City’s increased service population. The project’s additional solid waste would not increase the tonnage beyond the landfill’s permitted amount or result in the closure of the landfill prior to the anticipated 2032 date. As a result, the project would have a less than significant impact on solid waste disposal.

35 Estimated solid waste generation rates were obtained from CalRecycle. Total ppd generated by proposed project = 3,750 SF of commercial*(5 lb/1000 sf/day) + 157 residential units*(5.4 lbs/day/dwelling unit) = 857.18 ppd E.3.c
Packet Pg. 499

San Juan Apartments Project
City of Hollister Environmental Initial Study
July 2023
Page | 102

3.20 Wildfire

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project:
a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plan? X
b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors,
exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose
project occupants to, pollutant concentrations
from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a
wildfire?
X
c) Require the installation or maintenance of
associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel
breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or
other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or
that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts
to the environment?
X
d) Expose people or structures to significant risks,
including downslope or downstream flooding or
landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope
instability, or drainage changes?
X
Existing Setting
The 5.55-acre site is located within an urban area and is predominately surrounded by residential and industrial uses. The proposed project is within a Local Responsibility Area (LRA) unzoned on the “Fire Hazard Severity Zone” on the map dated October 200736 and “LRA Incorporated” on the Fire Hazard Severity Zones in LRA Map dated November 2007.37 The nearest Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is approximately 2.5 miles southwest of the project site.

36 California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. Draft Fire Hazard Severity Zones in LRA. Ava ilable at:
https://osfm.fire.ca.gov/media/6773/fhszl06_1_map35.pdf . Accessed on April 6, 2022. 37 California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. VHFHSZ in LRA. Available at: https://osfm.fire.ca.gov/media/6771/fhszs_map35.pdf .

Accessed on April 6, 2022.

E.3.c
Packet Pg. 500

San Juan Apartments Project
City of Hollister Environmental Initial Study
July 2023
Page | 103

Discussion
a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? No Impact. The San Benito County Emergency Services Department is the lead agency for emergency situations in the City. The Department has adopted an Emergency Operations Plan (August 2015), which include standard operating procedures for hazards, including urban/wildland interface fires. Because the project site is zoned in the “Non-Very High Fire Hazard Safety Zone” and outside of the Wildland Urban Interface Fire Area, the proposed project would not substantially impair the County’s Emergency Operations and Evacuation Plan. Thus, no impacts would occur. b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
No Impact. The project site is zoned in the “Non-Very High Fire Hazard Safety Zone”. In addition, the project site is relatively flat and in an urbanized area with residential and commercial buildings. The nearest Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is approximately 2.5 miles southwest of the project site. Thus, no impacts would occur.
c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? No Impact. As previously discussed, all proposed project components (including infrastructure, roads, etc.) would be located within the boundaries of the project site, and impacts associated with the development of the project within this footprint area analyzed throughout this document. Additionally, as part of the City’s process, the City will review all plans for adequate fire suppression, fire access, and emergency evacuation. Adherence to standard City policies would result in no impacts. d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes? No Impact. As discussed above, the project site is zoned in the “Non-Very High Fire Hazard Safety Zone”.

In addition, the project site is relatively flat and the proposed on-site detention/percolation pipes and facilities would limit the release of stormwater from the site; therefore, the proposed project site would not expose people to flooding or landslides as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability or drainage changes. Thus, no impacts would occur.

E.3.c
Packet Pg. 501

San Juan Apartments Project
City of Hollister Environmental Initial Study
July 2023
Page | 104

3.21 Mandatory Findings of Significance

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Does the project:
a) Have the potential to substantially degrade the
quality of the environment, substantially reduce
the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-
sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, substantially reduce the
number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory?
X
b) Does the project have impacts that are
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable"
means that the incremental effects of a project
are considerable when viewed in connection with
the effects of past projects, the effects of other
current projects, and the effects of probable
future projects)?
X
c) Does the project have environmental effects
which will cause substantial adverse effects on
human beings, either directly or indirectly?
X
Discussion
a) Have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory?
Less than Significant with Mitigation. As discussed in the individual sections, the proposed project would not degrade the quality of the environment with the implementation of identified City policies and mitigation measures. As discussed in Section 3.4, Biological Resources, based on known regional occurrences and potential special status wildlife species known to occur in the San Benito River area, Burrowing Owl, San Joaquin Coachwhip, local bat species and nesting special status species of birds, E.3.c
Packet Pg. 502

San Juan Apartments Project
City of Hollister Environmental Initial Study
July 2023
Page | 105

raptors and other protected birds could have the potential to occur on the project site given the site’s proximity to the San Benito River. However, mitigation measures MM BIO-1 through MM BIO-4 would avoid potential impacts associated with project construction and reduce impacts to sensitive habitat or species to a less than significant level.

As identified Section 3.5, Cultural Resources, the potential for the project to disturb important examples of California history or prehistory would be low. However, mitigation measures MM CUL-2 and MM CUL- 2 would ensure that if unknown cultural or tribal resources are discovered during construction activities, the proposed project does not adversely affect any cultural resources or human remains. Implementation of these mitigation measures would ensure that the proposed projec t does not eliminate examples of major periods of California history and prehistory, which would reduce potential impacts to less than significant.

As described in the environmental topic sections of this Initial Study, impacts were found to be less than significant, and the proposed project would not have environmental effects that would cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerabl e? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? Less than Significant Impact. Under Section 15065(a)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, a lead agency shall find that a project may have a significant effect on the environment where there is substantial evidence that the project has potential environmental effects “that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable.” As defined in Section 15065(a)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, cumulatively considerable means “that the incremental effects of an individual project are significant when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.” In addition, under Section 15152(f) of the CEQA Guidelines, where a lead agency has determined that a cumulative effect has been adequately addressed in a prior EIR, the effect is not treated as significant for purposes of later environmental review and need not be discussed in detail.

The proposed project would result in temporary air quality, water quality, biology, and noise impacts during construction. With the implementation of the identified mitigation measures, Conditions of Project Approval, and Standard Permit Conditions, and consistency with adopted City policies, the construction impacts would be mitigated to a less than significant level. As the identified impacts are temporary and would be mitigated, the project would not have cumulatively considerable impacts on air quality, water quality, biology, and noise impacts in the project area.

Implementation of the proposed project would result in the demolition of the existing ancillary building on site. The project would also contribute to the continued urbanization of the project area.

The proposed project would have a less than significant impact on aesthetics, geology and soils, haza rds and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, population and housing, recreation, and utilities, and would not contribute to cumulative impacts to these resources. The proposed project would not impact agricultural and forest resources or mineral resources. Therefore, the proposed project would not contribute to a significant cumulative impact on these resources.

E.3.c
Packet Pg. 503

San Juan Apartments Project
City of Hollister Environmental Initial Study
July 2023
Page | 106

The proposed project’s contribution to a cumulative impact on public services and transportation were analyzed in the General Plan FEIR. The proposed project would not result in a more significant cumulative impact related to these issues than disclosed within these documents.

The project would contribute to the significant cumulative transportation impact that would occur under full buildout of the General Plan FEIR. The project would not, however, result in any new or more significant cumulative impacts than the approved projects. Mitigation measures were adopted where feasible and statements of overriding considerations have been adopted for both plans. c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly?
Less than Significant Impact. Consistent with Section 15065(a)(4) of the CEQA Guidelines, a lead agency shall find that a project may have a significant effect on the environment where there is substantial evidence that the proposed project has the potential to cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. Under this standard, a change to the physical environment that might otherwise be minor must be treated as significant if people would be significantly affected. This factor relates to adverse changes to the environment of human beings generally, and not to effects on particular individuals. While changes to the environment that could indirectly affect human beings would be represented by all of the designated CEQA issue areas, those that could directly affect human beings include construction impacts related to air quality, hazardous materials and noise. However, implementation of mitigation measures and General Plan policies would reduce these impacts to a less than significant level. No other direct or indirect adverse effects on human beings have been identified.

E.3.c
Packet Pg. 504

San Juan Apartments Project
City of Hollister Environmental Initial Study
July 2023
Page | 107

REFERENCES
California, State of, Department of Conservation, Williamson Act/Land Conservation Act. Available at http://www.conservation.ca.gov/dlrp/lca . Accessed March 28, 2022.

California Department of Finance. Table 2: E -5 City/County Population and Housing Estimates, 1/1/2022.

Available at: http://www.dof.ca.gov/Forecasting/Demographics/Estimates/e-5/ . Accessed April 5, 2022.

California Employment Development Department. Monthly Labor Force Data for Cities and Census Designated Places February 2022. Available at:
https://www.labormarketinfo.edd.ca.gov/data/labor-force-and-unemployment-for-cities-and- census-areas.html. Accessed April 5, 2022.

California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. Draft Fire Hazard Severity Zones in LRA. Available at: https://osfm.fire.ca.gov/media/6773/fhszl06_1_map35.pdf . Accessed on April 6, 2022.

California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. VHFHSZ in LRA. Available at:
https://osfm.fire.ca.gov/media/6771/fhszs_map35.pdf . Accessed on April 6, 2022.

CalRecycle. 2019. Estimated Solid Waste Generation Rates. Available at:
https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/WasteCharacterization/General/Rates . Accessed on September 3, 2020.
______. 2022. John Smith Road Landfill, San Benito County. Available at:
https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/PublicNotices/Details/903 . Accessed on April 6, 2022.

City of Hollister. Briggs 17 Uni fied Cannabis Cultivation Park, Hollister CA– Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration, page 80. July 2019.

City of Hollister. 2005. City of Hollister General Plan.

City of Hollister. 2005. City of Hollister General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report.

City of Hollister. 2020. Contacts. Available at: http://hollister.ca.gov/contact/ . Accessed on April 6, 2022.

Caltrans (California Department of Transportation). 2014. Scenic Highway Program. http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LandArch/scenic_highways/scenic_hwy.htm .

Council of San Benito County Governments. 2014. On the Move: 2035 San Benito Regional Transportation Plan. Adopted June 19.

DOC (California Department of Conservation). 2011. San Benito County Important Farmland. _____. 2014. Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program (FMMP). Accessed April 6, 2022. http://www.conservation.ca.gov/dlrp/FMMP/Pages/Index.aspx .

Dudek. 2020. Cultural resources assessment for the Sanchez-Mesa Apartment Project, City of Hollister, California.

E.3.c
Packet Pg. 505

San Juan Apartments Project
City of Hollister Environmental Initial Study
July 2023
Page | 108

FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). 2014. Flood Map FIRM Panel 06069C0185D. Accessed April 1, 2022. https://msc.fema.gov/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/FemaWelcomeView ? storeId=10001&catalogId=10001&langId=-1.

Geotracker. 1550 San Juan Road Hollister. Available at:
https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/map/?CMD=runreport&myaddress=1550+san+juan+roa d+hollister. Accessed on April 6, 2022.

Hollister, City of. 2005a. City of Hollister General Plan. Amended December 7, 2009. http://hollister.ca.goc/Site.html/gov/office/planning.asp . ______. 2005b. City of Hollister General Plan Environmental Impact Report. ______. Municipal Code, Title 17 (Zoning).

Kimley-Horn. 2020. Mixed-Use Residential Project at 1550 San Juan Road – Hazardous Materials Assessment.

Kimley-Horn. 2022. Transportation Impact Analysis - 1550 San Juan Road, Hollister CA.

MBARD (Monterey Bay Air Resources District). 2016 Air Quality Management Plan for the Monterey Bay Region.

My School Location. Hollister School District. Available at:
https://www.myschoollocation.com/hollistersd . Accessed on April 6, 2022.

NCES (National Center for Education Statistics). 2022a. Hollister School District. Available at:
https://nces.ed.gov/ccd/districtsearch/district_detail.asp?ID2=0617340 . Accessed on April 6, 2022.

NCES (National Center for Education Statistics). 2022b. San Benito High School District. Available at:
https://nces.ed.gov/ccd/schoolsearch/school_detail.asp?Search=1&DistrictID=0634140&ID=063 414005344. Accessed on April 6, 2022.

Recology. 2022. San Benito County Start Collection Services. Available at:
https://www.recology.com/recology-san-benito-county/service/ . Accessed on April 6, 2022.

San Benito County Free Library. Available at: http://sbcfl.org/ . Accessed on April 6, 2022.

San Benito County Free Library. Annual Report 2020. Available at: https://sbcfl.org/wp- content/uploads/2021/02/2019-20-Infographic.pdf
San Benito County Airport Land Use Commission. 2012. Hollister Municipal Airport Comprehensive Land Use Plan. Adopted June 21. Available at:
http://www.sanbenitocog.org/pdf/ADOPTED%20%20ALUCP%20-June%202012.pdf .

SBCWD (San Benito County Water District). 2013. Annual Groundwater Report. ______. 2020. Urban Water Projects. Available at: https://www.sbcwd.com/urban-water-projects/ .

E.3.c
Packet Pg. 506

San Juan Apartments Project
City of Hollister Environmental Initial Study
July 2023
Page | 109

Soil Surveys Group, Inc. 2020. Geotechnical Investigation for the Proposed New Four Story Apartment Building with Underground Parking, Community Building, and Three Story Mixed Use Building with New Parking Areas.

State of California, Department of Transportation (Caltrans). 2002. Transportation Related Earthborne Vibrations. January.

Todd Engineers. 2016. 2015 Hollister Urban Area Urban Water Management Plan. Prepared for the San Benito County Water District, the Sunnyslope County Water District, and the City of Hollister. ______. 2019. 2019 Annual Water Quality Report – City of Hollister Water System.

US Forest Service, Interactive Visitor Map. Available at https://www.fs.fed.us/ivm/ . Accessed March 28, 2022
Veolia (Veolia Water West Operating Services, Inc.). 2012. City of Hollister Master Reclamation Requirements Central Coast RWQCB Order No. R3-2008-0069, 2011 Annual Report.

E.3.c
Packet Pg. 507

Supporting Figures
San Juan Apartments Project
City File#: S&A 2022-11 and DB 2023-1
July 2023
E.3.c
Packet Pg. 508

Not to scale
Source: Google Earth, 2020
Figure 1: Regional and Local Vicinity Map
San Juan Apartments Project
Initial Study
Project SiteProject Site
Project Site
E.3.c
Packet Pg. 509

Not to scale
Source: Google Earth, 2022
Figure 2: Surrounding Land Uses
San Juan Apartments Project
Initial Study
Project SiteProject Site
Gr
a
f

R
o
a
d
Gr
a
f

R
o
a
d
4th Street4th Street
Pe
a
c
h

L
a
n
e
Pe
a
c
h

L
a
n
e
Chestnut LaneChestnut Lane
Peartree LanePeartree Lane
Redwood LaneRedwood Lane
State Route 156BState Route 156B
Residen�al UsesResiden�al Uses
R
i
v
e
r

P
a
r
k

T
r
a
i
l
R
i
v
e
r

P
a
r
k

T
r
a
i
l
Agricultural Storage PondsAgricultural Storage Ponds
Agricultural Storage PondsAgricultural Storage Ponds
Residen�al UsesResiden�al Uses
Auto Repair/Wrecking YardAuto Repair/Wrecking Yard
Residen�al UsesResiden�al Uses
Shop N SaveShop N Save
Residen�al UsesResiden�al Uses
E.3.c
Packet Pg. 510

Source: Kimley-Horn 2020
Figure 3a: Site Photos
San Juan Apartments Project
Initial Study
Views into the property and into the adjacent properties.

E.3.c
Packet Pg. 511

Source: Kimley-Horn 2020
Figure 3b: Site Photos
San Juan Apartments Project
Initial Study
Views into the property and along State Route 156B.

E.3.c
Packet Pg. 512

Not to scale
Source: Project Application Materials, 2022
Figure 4: Site Plan
San Juan Apartments Project
Initial Study
UP
UPC
C
C
C
C
C
CCC
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
PP
COM
MH
8"T
(2)36"T
36"T
76"T
28"T
(2)12"T
TOE
TOP
TOP
100
100
1 0
0 90
95 SAN
JUAN
ROAD

X TO PARCEL
1360 OR
309
TYPE 1
BBQ 4'X3'
4'X3'
4'X3'
4'X3'4'X3'4'X3'4'X3'4'X3'
4'X3'4'X3'4'X3'
TYPE 1
TYPE 1
4'X3'
SAN
JUAN
ROAD
PARCEL 5
PARCEL 6
PARCEL 4
APN 052-090-014
APN 052-090-015
APN 052-091-017PARCEL 2
APN 052-090-009

X TO PARCEL
1360 OR
309
BUILDING 3BUILDING 5
BUILDING 6
BUILDING 7
BUILDING 8
BUILDING 1
BUILDING 2
BUILDING 4
22' - 7"
37' - 0"
24' - 3"
24' - 4"
15' - 6"10' - 0"
25' - 7"
14' - 3"
10' - 0"
14' - 4"
10' - 0"
14' - 3"10' - 0"
24' - 3"
10' - 0"
14' - 3"
24' - 4"
14' - 3"10'
1 AS104
1 1416
2839
71 98
102
106
156
165
172
182
194
195
26' - 1"
20' - 0"
10' - 0"
16' - 1"
10' - 0"
17' - 0"20' - 0"
45' - 9"
3 AS104
2 AS104
2 AS104
1" = 30'-0"
1 SCHEMATIC SI

FUTURE OPENING FOR ACCESS

TO ADJACENT PARCEL AT THIS

LOCATION
E.3.c
Packet Pg. 513

Not to scale
San Juan Apartments Project
Initial Study
-0
3 -
R
S
2 1
-
1 5
5 0
-
S
a
n
-
J
u
a
n
-
R
d
-
A
p
t
s
-
C
E
\
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
\
D
e
s
D
e
v
\
S
h
e
e
t
-
F
i
l
e
s
\
C
2 -

G
r
a
d
i
n
g

D
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
.
d
w
g
,

S
H
E
E
T

T
I
T
L
E
,

A
u
g

1 7
,

20 2
1 2
:
1 8
p
m
,

R
A
G
o
m
e
z
San Juan Roa
0 feet60
1"=30'
30 90
LEG
San Juan Roa
Grading and
August 17, 2021
A
TH
TH
SU
TH
D
FO
A
G
IM
A
C
C
A
A
TR
A
GR

1. 2.

3. 4.

SAN JUAN APARTMENTS ENTITLEMENT

GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN
Source: Project Application Materials, 2022
Figure 5: Grading and Drainage Plan
E.3.c
Packet Pg. 514

Not to scale
San Juan Apartments Project
Initial Study
Source: Project Application Materials, 2022
Figure 6: Traffic Circulation
UP
UPC
C
C
C
C
C
CCC
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
PP
COM
MH
8"T
(2)36"T
36"T
76"T
28"T
(2)12"T
TOE
TOP
TOP
100
100
1 0
0 90
95 SAN
JUAN
ROAD

FUTURE OPENING FOR ACCESS

TO ADJACENT PARCEL AT THIS

LOCATION
Road A
Road B
Road
B
E.3.c
Packet Pg. 515

Not to scale
Figure 7: Landscape Plan
San Juan Apartments Project
Initial Study
SAN JUAN APARTMENTS ENTITLEMENT 1433-02-RS20
17 AUGUST 2021 L1LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN
Source: Project Application Materials, 2022
E.3.c
Packet Pg. 516

Not to scale
Source: Project Application Materials, 2022
an
-
R
d
-
A
p
t
s
-
C
E
\
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
\
D
e
s
D
e
v
\
S
h
e
e
t
-
F
i
l
e
s
\
C
3 -

S
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r

C
o
n
t
r
o
l

P
l
a
n
.
d
w
g
,

S
H
E
E
T

T
I
T
L
E
,

A
u
g

1 7
,

2 0
2 1

2 :
2 0
p
m
,

R
A
G
o
m
e
z
PRO
PRO
0 feet60
1"=30'
30 90
LEGEN
SD
TIER 1- R
·RO
·MI
TIER 2 - W
·ON
TIER 3 - R
·PA
AN
OF
·STO
AP
TIER 4 - P
·STO
RA
HY
MA
OF
10 PROJE
REQUIR
AREA O
(A) EXIS
IMPERV
PERVIO
(B) PRO
IMPERV
PERVIO

SELF-RE
Stormwater Mana
0 15 30 60
1” = 30’-0” 24X36 SHEET

STORMWATER CONTROL PLAN

PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS

PROPOSED AC

PROPOSED BUILDING

PROPOSED CONCRETE

PROPOSED PERVIOUS

PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AREA

PROPOSED PERVIOUS PAVER AREA
LEGEND

PROPOSED PRIVATE STORM DRAIN
DMA 1 (62,047 SF)
SD
TIER 1- RUNOFF REDUCTION
·ROOF DRAIN DISCONNECT
·MINIMIZE IMPERVIOUS AREAS
TIER 2 - WATER QUALITY (85th PERCENTILE = 0.8")
·ON-SITE RETENTION-BASED INFILTRATION
TIER 3 - RETAIN 95TH PERCENTILE STORM EVENT (1.2")
·PAVERS WILL SELF-RETAIN AND ADDITIONALLY RETAIN

AND INFILTRATE AN APPROXIMATE IMPERVIOUS AREA
OF 22,400 SF
·STORAGE CHAMBERS WILL RETAIN AND INFILTRATE
APPROXIMATE VOLUME 9,000 CF
TIER 4 - PEAK MANAGEMENT
·STORAGE CHAMBERS ARE SIZED USING A MODIFIED

RATIONAL METHOD AND APPROXIMATED

HYDROGRAPHS TO DETAIN A VOLUME BASED ON
MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE OUTFLOW NOT TO EXCEED 90%

PROJECT STATISTICS

REQUIRED STORMWATER CONTROL MEASURES
AREA OF DISTURBANCE: 223,941 SF

5.14 AC
(A) EXISTING CONDITION
IMPERVIOUS AREA: 12,635 SF

0.29 AC
PERVIOUS AREA: 211,306 SF

4.85 AC
(B) PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
IMPERVIOUS AREA: 125,060 SF

2.87 AC
PERVIOUS AREA:51,496 SF

1.18 AC
SELF-RETAINING AREAS: 47,385 SF

1.09 AC
DMA 2 (161,894 SF)
Figure 8: Stormwater Control Plan
San Juan Apartments Project
Initial Study
E.3.c
Packet Pg. 517

Source: Project Application Materials, 2022
Figure 9a: Building Elevations - Residential
San Juan Apartments Project
Initial Study
0 4 8 16
1/8” = 1’-0” 11X17 SHEET
SAN JUAN APARTMENTS ENTITLEMENT 1433-02-RS20
17 AUGUST 2021 A8ELEVATIONS - RESIDENTIAL

RIGHT ELEVATION-RESIDENTIAL BUILDING
1/8 = 1'-0" (24 X 36 SHEET)3

FRONT ELEVATION-RESIDENTIAL BUILDING
1/8 = 1'-0" (24 X 36 SHEET)2

DRIVE-AISLE ELEVATION-RESIDENTIAL BUILDING
1/8 = 1'-0" (24 X 36 SHEET)1

LEFT ELEVATION-RESIDENTIAL BUILDING
1/8" = 1'-0" (24 X 36 SHEET)4
0’-0”
GROUND F.F.
9’-1”
FIRST T.O.P.
42’-8”

MAX PROPOSED HEIGHT
19’-4 3/4”
SECOND T.O.P.
29’-8 1/2”
THIRD T.O.P.
10’-3 3/4”
LEVEL 2
20’-7 1/2”
LEVEL 3
0’-0”
GROUND F.F.
9’-1”
FIRST T.O.P.
42’-8”

MAX PROPOSED HEIGHT
19’-4 3/4”
SECOND T.O.P.
29’-8 1/2”
THIRD T.O.P.
10’-3 3/4”
LEVEL 2
20’-7 1/2”
LEVEL 3
9’
-
1 ”
9’
-
1 ”
9’
-
1 ”
9’
-
1 ”
9’
-
1 ”
9’
-
1 ”
9’
-
1 ”
9’
-
1 ”
9’
-
1 ”
E.3.c
Packet Pg. 518

Source: Project Application Materials, 2022
Figure 9b: Building Elevations -- Community Building
San Juan Apartments Project
Initial Study
0 4 8 16
1/8” = 1’-0” 11X17 SHEET
SAN JUAN APARTMENTS ENTITLEMENT 1433-02-RS20
17 AUGUST 2021 A11ELEVATIONS - COMMUNITY BUILDING

REAR ELEVATION-COMMUNITY BUILDING
1/8" = 1'-0" (24 X 36 SHEET)3

FRONT ELEVATION-COMMUNITY BUILDING
1/8" = 1'-0" (24 X 36 SHEET)1 LEFT ELEVATION-COMMUNITY BUILDING 1/8" = 1'-0" (24 X 36 SHEET)2

RIGHT ELEVATION-COMMUNITY BUILDING
1/8" = 1'-0" (24 X 36 SHEET)4
0’-0”
10’-1”
39’-11”
GROUND F.F.

FIRST T.O.P.

MAX PROPOSED HEIGHT
20’-4 3/4”
SECOND T.O.P.
30’-8 1/2”
THIRD T.O.P.
11’-3 3/4”
LEVEL 2
21’-7 1/2”
LEVEL 3
0’-0”
10’-1”
39’-11”
GROUND F.F.

FIRST T.O.P.

MAX PROPOSED HEIGHT
20’-4 3/4”
SECOND T.O.P.
30’-8 1/2”
THIRD T.O.P.
11’-3 3/4”
LEVEL 2
21’-7 1/2”
LEVEL 3
0’-0”
10’-1”
39’-11”
GROUND F.F.

FIRST T.O.P.

MAX PROPOSED HEIGHT
20’-4 3/4”
SECOND T.O.P.
30’-8 1/2”
THIRD T.O.P.
11’-3 3/4”
LEVEL 2
21’-7 1/2”
LEVEL 3
0’-0”
10’-1”
39’-11”
GROUND F.F.

FIRST T.O.P.

MAX PROPOSED HEIGHT
20’-4 3/4”
SECOND T.O.P.
30’-8 1/2”
THIRD T.O.P.
11’-3 3/4”
LEVEL 2
21’-7 1/2”
LEVEL 3
9’
-
1 ”
9’
-
1 ”
10 ’
-
1 ”
9’
-
1 ”
9’
-
1 ”
10 ’
-
1 ”
9’
-
1 ”
9’
-
1 ”
10 ’
-
1 ”
9’
-
1 ”
9’
-
1 ”
10 ’
-
1 ”
E.3.c
Packet Pg. 519

Source: Project Application Materials, 2022
Figure 9c: Building Elevations - Commercial Building
San Juan Apartments Project
Initial Study
0 4 8 16
1/8” = 1’-0” 11X17 SHEET
SAN JUAN APARTMENTS ENTITLEMENT 1433-02-RS20
17 AUGUST 2021 A14ELEVATIONS - COMMERCIAL BLDG

DRIVE AISLE ELEVATION-COMMERCIAL BUILDING
1/8" = 1'-0" (24 X 36 SHEET)3

FRONT ELEVATION-COMMERCIAL BUILDING
1/8" = 1'-0" (24 X 36 SHEET)1 RIGHT ELEVATION-COMMERCIAL BUILDING 1/8" = 1'-0" (24 X 36 SHEET)2

LEFT ELEVATION-COMMERCIAL BUILDING
1/8" = 1'-0" (24 X 36 SHEET)4
0’-0”
15’-0”
45’-0”
GROUND F.F.

FIRST T.O.P.

MAX PROPOSED HEIGHT
25’-3 3/4”
SECOND T.O.P.
35’-7 1/2”
THIRD T.O.P.
26’-6 1/2”
LEVEL 3
16’-2 3/4”
LEVEL 2
45’-0”
0’-0”
GROUND F.F.
15’-0”
FIRST T.O.P.

MAX PROPOSED HEIGHT
25’-3 3/4”
SECOND T.O.P.
35’-7 1/2”
THIRD T.O.P.
26’-6 1/2”
LEVEL 3
16’-2 3/4”
LEVEL 2
15 ’
-
0 ”
9’
-
1 ”
9’
-
1 ”
15 ’
-
0 ”
9’
-
1 ”
9’
-
1 ”
E.3.c
Packet Pg. 520

Technical Appendices
San Juan Apartments Project
City File #: S&A 2022-11 and DB 2023-1
July 2023
E.3.d
Packet Pg. 521

Appendix A
Air Quality Data
E.3.d
Packet Pg. 522

1550 San Juan
San Benito County, Summer
Project Characteristics -
Land Use -
Construction Phase - Per Construction Questionnaire
Demolition -
Grading -
Vehicle Trips - Per trip gen table
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Per MBARD rul compliance Water Mitigation -
Waste Mitigation - Per AB 939

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Parking Lot 288.00 Space 2.59 115,200.00 0
Apartments Mid Rise 157.00 Dwelling Unit 4.13 157,000.00 449 Regional Shopping Center 3.90 1000sqft 0.09 3,900.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
4 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.5 50

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Pacific Gas and Electric Company
2024Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
203.98 0.033CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.004N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:40 AMPage 1 of 31 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 523

2.0 Emissions Summary
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstDustMitigation CleanPavedRoadPercentReduction 0 6 tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadMoistureContent 0 12 tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 43.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 230.00 423.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 10.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 34.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 23.00
tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 7,270.00
tblVehicleTrips DV_TP 11.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips DV_TP 35.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips PB_TP 3.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips PB_TP 11.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 86.00 100.00
tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 54.00 100.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 4.91 4.29
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 46.12 52.01
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 4.09 4.29
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 21.10 52.01
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 5.44 4.29
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 37.75 52.01
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:40 AMPage 2 of 31 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 524

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2022 3.2300 33.1196 21.5115 0.0469 19.8049 1.6134 21.4182 10.1417 1.4843 11.6260 0.0000 4,697.937 4 4,697.937
4 1.1962 0.2721 4,802.474
2 2023 2.1315 16.3974 20.9233 0.0462 1.5831 0.7183 2.3014 0.4255 0.6759 1.1014 0.0000 4,549.482 3 4,549.482
3 0.6443 0.1447 4,608.697
1 2024 50.3392 16.6866 23.0804 0.0510 1.8542 0.6936 2.5478 0.4974 0.6561 1.1535 0.0000 5,029.264 3 5,029.264
3 0.6592 0.1467 5,089.461
1 Maximum 50.3392 33.1196 23.0804 0.0510 19.8049 1.6134 21.4182 10.1417 1.4843 11.6260 0.0000 5,029.264 3 5,029.264
3 1.1962 0.2721 5,089.461
1 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2022 3.2300 33.1196 21.5115 0.0469 8.5435 1.6134 10.1569 4.3561 1.4843 5.8404 0.0000 4,697.937 4 4,697.937
4 1.1962 0.2721 4,802.474
2 2023 2.1315 16.3974 20.9233 0.0462 1.5029 0.7183 2.2211 0.4058 0.6759 1.0817 0.0000 4,549.482 3 4,549.482
3 0.6443 0.1447 4,608.697
0 2024 50.3392 16.6866 23.0804 0.0510 1.7598 0.6936 2.4534 0.4742 0.6561 1.1303 0.0000 5,029.264 3 5,029.264
3 0.6592 0.1467 5,089.461
1 Maximum 50.3392 33.1196 23.0804 0.0510 8.5435 1.6134 10.1569 4.3561 1.4843 5.8404 0.0000 5,029.264 3 5,029.264
3 1.1962 0.2721 5,089.461
1 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:40 AMPage 3 of 31 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 525

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 49.20 0.00 43.54 52.68 0.00 41.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:40 AMPage 4 of 31 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 526

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 4.4424 0.1495 12.9770 6.9000e-
004

0.0719 0.0719 0.0719 0.0719 0.0000 23.3866 23.3866 0.0225 0.0000 23.9502 Energy 0.0392 0.3347 0.1434 2.1400e-
003

0.0271 0.0271 0.0271 0.0271 427.0910 427.0910 8.1900e-
003

7.8300e-
003
429.6290
Mobile 3.1187 5.8556 27.0541 0.0636 5.8298 0.0668 5.8965 1.5563 0.0630 1.6193 6,588.364 3 6,588.364
3 0.3345 0.3905 6,713.089
7 Total 7.6003 6.3397 40.1745 0.0664 5.8298 0.1657 5.9954 1.5563 0.1619 1.7182 0.0000 7,038.841 9 7,038.841
9 0.3652 0.3983 7,166.668
9 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 4.4424 0.1495 12.9770 6.9000e-
004

0.0719 0.0719 0.0719 0.0719 0.0000 23.3866 23.3866 0.0225 0.0000 23.9502 Energy 0.0392 0.3347 0.1434 2.1400e-
003

0.0271 0.0271 0.0271 0.0271 427.0910 427.0910 8.1900e-
003

7.8300e-
003
429.6290
Mobile 3.1187 5.8556 27.0541 0.0636 5.8298 0.0668 5.8965 1.5563 0.0630 1.6193 6,588.364 3 6,588.364
3 0.3345 0.3905 6,713.089
7 Total 7.6003 6.3397 40.1745 0.0664 5.8298 0.1657 5.9954 1.5563 0.1619 1.7182 0.0000 7,038.841 9 7,038.841
9 0.3652 0.3983 7,166.668
9 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:40 AMPage 5 of 31 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 527

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 9/1/2022 9/14/2022 5 10
2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 9/15/2022 9/28/2022 5 10 3 Grading Grading 9/29/2022 11/15/2022 5 34
4 Paving Paving 11/16/2022 12/16/2022 5 23
5 Building Construction Building Construction 12/19/2022 7/31/2024 5 423 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 6/3/2024 7/31/2024 5 43 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 317,925; Residential Outdoor: 105,975; Non-Residential Indoor: 5,850; Non-Residential Outdoor: 1,950; Striped Parking Area: 6,912 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 15
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 34
Acres of Paving: 2.59
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:40 AMPage 6 of 31 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 528

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Replace Ground Cover
Water Exposed Area
Water Unpaved Roads
Grading Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 27.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 6 15.00 0.00 909.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 163.00 36.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 33.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:40 AMPage 7 of 31 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 529

3.2 Demolition - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.5875 0.0000 0.5875 0.0890 0.0000 0.0890 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.6392 25.7194 20.5941 0.0388 1.2427 1.2427 1.1553 1.1553 3,746.781 2 3,746.781
2 1.0524 3,773.092
0 Total 2.6392 25.7194 20.5941 0.0388 0.5875 1.2427 1.8301 0.0890 1.1553 1.2442 3,746.781 2 3,746.781
2 1.0524 3,773.092
0 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads
Clean Paved Roads
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:40 AMPage 8 of 31 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 530

3.2 Demolition - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0103 0.4028 0.0827 1.6300e-
003

0.0473 4.3100e-
003

0.0517 0.0130 4.1200e-
003

0.0171 172.8914 172.8914 5.4000e-
004

0.0272 181.0040
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0499 0.0300 0.4085 1.1200e-
003

0.1232 6.6000e-
004

0.1239 0.0327 6.1000e-
004

0.0333 113.9271 113.9271 3.4000e-
003

3.0200e-
003
114.9116
Total 0.0602 0.4328 0.4912 2.7500e-
003

0.1706 4.9700e-
003

0.1755 0.0457 4.7300e-
003

0.0504 286.8185 286.8185 3.9400e-
003

0.0302 295.9156
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.2511 0.0000 0.2511 0.0380 0.0000 0.0380 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.6392 25.7194 20.5941 0.0388 1.2427 1.2427 1.1553 1.1553 0.0000 3,746.781 2 3,746.781
2 1.0524 3,773.092
0 Total 2.6392 25.7194 20.5941 0.0388 0.2511 1.2427 1.4938 0.0380 1.1553 1.1933 0.0000 3,746.781 2 3,746.781
2 1.0524 3,773.092
0 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:40 AMPage 9 of 31 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 531

0.0452 4.3100e-
003

0.0495 0.0125 4.1200e-
003

0.0166 172.8914 172.8914 5.4000e-
004

0.0272 181.0040
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0499 0.0300 0.4085 1.1200e-
003

0.1168 6.6000e-
004

0.1175 0.0311 6.1000e-
004

0.0317 113.9271 113.9271 3.4000e-
003

3.0200e-
003
114.9116
Total 0.0602 0.4328 0.4912 2.7500e-
003

0.1620 4.9700e-
003

0.1670 0.0436 4.7300e-
003

0.0483 286.8185 286.8185 3.9400e-
003

0.0302 295.9156
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.3 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 19.6570 0.0000 19.6570 10.1025 0.0000 10.1025 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 1.6126 1.6126 1.4836 1.4836 3,686.061 9 3,686.061
9 1.1922 3,715.865
5 Total 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 19.6570 1.6126 21.2696 10.1025 1.4836 11.5860 3,686.061 9 3,686.061
9 1.1922 3,715.865
5 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:40 AMPage 10 of 31 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 532

3.3 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0599 0.0360 0.4902 1.3400e-
003

0.1479 7.9000e-
004

0.1487 0.0392 7.3000e-
004

0.0400 136.7125 136.7125 4.0800e-
003

3.6200e-
003
137.8939
Total 0.0599 0.0360 0.4902 1.3400e-
003

0.1479 7.9000e-
004

0.1487 0.0392 7.3000e-
004

0.0400 136.7125 136.7125 4.0800e-
003

3.6200e-
003
137.8939
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.4034 0.0000 8.4034 4.3188 0.0000 4.3188 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 1.6126 1.6126 1.4836 1.4836 0.0000 3,686.061 9 3,686.061
9 1.1922 3,715.865
5 Total 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 8.4034 1.6126 10.0159 4.3188 1.4836 5.8024 0.0000 3,686.061 9 3,686.061
9 1.1922 3,715.865
5 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:40 AMPage 11 of 31 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 533

3.3 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0599 0.0360 0.4902 1.3400e-
003

0.1402 7.9000e-
004

0.1410 0.0373 7.3000e-
004

0.0381 136.7125 136.7125 4.0800e-
003

3.6200e-
003
137.8939
Total 0.0599 0.0360 0.4902 1.3400e-
003

0.1402 7.9000e-
004

0.1410 0.0373 7.3000e-
004

0.0381 136.7125 136.7125 4.0800e-
003

3.6200e-
003
137.8939
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 7.1111 0.0000 7.1111 3.4291 0.0000 3.4291 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.9486 20.8551 15.2727 0.0297 0.9409 0.9409 0.8656 0.8656 2,872.046 4 2,872.046
4 0.9289 2,895.268
4 Total 1.9486 20.8551 15.2727 0.0297 7.1111 0.9409 8.0520 3.4291 0.8656 4.2946 2,872.046 4 2,872.046
4 0.9289 2,895.268
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:40 AMPage 12 of 31 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 534

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.1019 3.9884 0.8188 0.0162 0.4688 0.0427 0.5114 0.1286 0.0408 0.1694 1,711.963 9 1,711.963
9 5.3700e-
003

0.2691 1,792.294
3 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0499 0.0300 0.4085 1.1200e-
003

0.1232 6.6000e-
004

0.1239 0.0327 6.1000e-
004

0.0333 113.9271 113.9271 3.4000e-
003

3.0200e-
003
114.9116
Total 0.1518 4.0184 1.2273 0.0173 0.5920 0.0433 0.6353 0.1613 0.0414 0.2027 1,825.891 0 1,825.891
0 8.7700e-
003

0.2721 1,907.205
9 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 3.0400 0.0000 3.0400 1.4659 0.0000 1.4659 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.9486 20.8551 15.2727 0.0297 0.9409 0.9409 0.8656 0.8656 0.0000 2,872.046 4 2,872.046
4 0.9289 2,895.268
4 Total 1.9486 20.8551 15.2727 0.0297 3.0400 0.9409 3.9809 1.4659 0.8656 2.3315 0.0000 2,872.046 4 2,872.046
4 0.9289 2,895.268
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:40 AMPage 13 of 31 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 535

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.1019 3.9884 0.8188 0.0162 0.4476 0.0427 0.4902 0.1234 0.0408 0.1642 1,711.963 9 1,711.963
9 5.3700e-
003

0.2691 1,792.294
3 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0499 0.0300 0.4085 1.1200e-
003

0.1168 6.6000e-
004

0.1175 0.0311 6.1000e-
004

0.0317 113.9271 113.9271 3.4000e-
003

3.0200e-
003
114.9116
Total 0.1518 4.0184 1.2273 0.0173 0.5644 0.0433 0.6077 0.1545 0.0414 0.1959 1,825.891 0 1,825.891
0 8.7700e-
003

0.2721 1,907.205
9 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Paving - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.1028 11.1249 14.5805 0.0228 0.5679 0.5679 0.5225 0.5225 2,207.660 3 2,207.660
3 0.7140 2,225.510
4 Paving 0.2950 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.3979 11.1249 14.5805 0.0228 0.5679 0.5679 0.5225 0.5225 2,207.660 3 2,207.660
3 0.7140 2,225.510
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:40 AMPage 14 of 31 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 536

3.5 Paving - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0499 0.0300 0.4085 1.1200e-
003

0.1232 6.6000e-
004

0.1239 0.0327 6.1000e-
004

0.0333 113.9271 113.9271 3.4000e-
003

3.0200e-
003
114.9116
Total 0.0499 0.0300 0.4085 1.1200e-
003

0.1232 6.6000e-
004

0.1239 0.0327 6.1000e-
004

0.0333 113.9271 113.9271 3.4000e-
003

3.0200e-
003
114.9116
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.1028 11.1249 14.5805 0.0228 0.5679 0.5679 0.5225 0.5225 0.0000 2,207.660 3 2,207.660
3 0.7140 2,225.510
4 Paving 0.2950 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.3979 11.1249 14.5805 0.0228 0.5679 0.5679 0.5225 0.5225 0.0000 2,207.660 3 2,207.660
3 0.7140 2,225.510
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:40 AMPage 15 of 31 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 537

0.1168 6.6000e-
004

0.1175 0.0311 6.1000e-
004

0.0317 113.9271 113.9271 3.4000e-
003

3.0200e-
003
114.9116
Total 0.0499 0.0300 0.4085 1.1200e-
003

0.1168 6.6000e-
004

0.1175 0.0311 6.1000e-
004

0.0317 113.9271 113.9271 3.4000e-
003

3.0200e-
003
114.9116
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.6 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:40 AMPage 16 of 31 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 538

3.6 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0942 2.0836 0.7094 7.7200e-
003

0.2441 0.0235 0.2676 0.0703 0.0225 0.0928 814.3768 814.3768 5.2500e- 003

0.1184 849.7872
Worker 0.5422 0.3262 4.4386 0.0122 1.3390 7.1900e-
003

1.3462 0.3552 6.6300e-
003

0.3618 1,238.007
3 1,238.007
3 0.0369 0.0328 1,248.706
0 Total 0.6364 2.4099 5.1481 0.0199 1.5831 0.0307 1.6138 0.4255 0.0291 0.4546 2,052.384 1 2,052.384
1 0.0422 0.1512 2,098.493
2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:40 AMPage 17 of 31 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 539

3.6 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0942 2.0836 0.7094 7.7200e-
003

0.2337 0.0235 0.2572 0.0677 0.0225 0.0902 814.3768 814.3768 5.2500e- 003

0.1184 849.7872
Worker 0.5422 0.3262 4.4386 0.0122 1.2692 7.1900e-
003

1.2764 0.3380 6.6300e-
003

0.3447 1,238.007
3 1,238.007
3 0.0369 0.0328 1,248.706
0 Total 0.6364 2.4099 5.1481 0.0199 1.5029 0.0307 1.5336 0.4058 0.0291 0.4349 2,052.384 1 2,052.384
1 0.0422 0.1512 2,098.493
2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.6 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:40 AMPage 18 of 31 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 540

3.6 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0574 1.7275 0.6183 7.4800e-
003

0.2441 0.0118 0.2559 0.0703 0.0112 0.0815 788.1633 788.1633 3.4400e- 003

0.1145 822.3724
Worker 0.5014 0.2850 4.0610 0.0118 1.3390 6.7800e-
003

1.3458 0.3552 6.2500e-
003

0.3614 1,206.109
1 1,206.109
1 0.0331 0.0302 1,215.918
6 Total 0.5588 2.0125 4.6793 0.0193 1.5831 0.0185 1.6016 0.4255 0.0175 0.4429 1,994.272 4 1,994.272
4 0.0365 0.1447 2,038.291
0 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:40 AMPage 19 of 31 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 541

3.6 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0574 1.7275 0.6183 7.4800e-
003

0.2337 0.0118 0.2454 0.0677 0.0112 0.0790 788.1633 788.1633 3.4400e- 003

0.1145 822.3724
Worker 0.5014 0.2850 4.0610 0.0118 1.2692 6.7800e-
003

1.2760 0.3380 6.2500e-
003

0.3443 1,206.109
1 1,206.109
1 0.0331 0.0302 1,215.918
6 Total 0.5588 2.0125 4.6793 0.0193 1.5029 0.0185 1.5214 0.4058 0.0175 0.4232 1,994.272 4 1,994.272
4 0.0365 0.1447 2,038.291
0 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.6 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Total 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:40 AMPage 20 of 31 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 542

3.6 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0545 1.7220 0.5884 7.3700e-
003

0.2441 0.0117 0.2558 0.0703 0.0112 0.0815 777.4413 777.4413 3.2100e- 003

0.1132 811.2447
Worker 0.4667 0.2513 3.7548 0.0114 1.3390 6.4300e-
003

1.3454 0.3552 5.9200e-
003

0.3611 1,176.490
8 1,176.490
8 0.0297 0.0279 1,185.546
0 Total 0.5212 1.9732 4.3432 0.0188 1.5831 0.0181 1.6012 0.4255 0.0171 0.4425 1,953.932 1 1,953.932
1 0.0329 0.1411 1,996.790
7 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 0.0000 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Total 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 0.0000 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:40 AMPage 21 of 31 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 543

3.6 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0545 1.7220 0.5884 7.3700e-
003

0.2337 0.0117 0.2454 0.0677 0.0112 0.0789 777.4413 777.4413 3.2100e- 003

0.1132 811.2447
Worker 0.4667 0.2513 3.7548 0.0114 1.2692 6.4300e-
003

1.2756 0.3380 5.9200e-
003

0.3440 1,176.490
8 1,176.490
8 0.0297 0.0279 1,185.546
0 Total 0.5212 1.9732 4.3432 0.0188 1.5029 0.0181 1.5210 0.4058 0.0171 0.4228 1,953.932 1 1,953.932
1 0.0329 0.1411 1,996.790
7 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 48.2520 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e-
003

0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:40 AMPage 22 of 31 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 544

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0945 0.0509 0.7602 2.3100e-
003

0.2711 1.3000e-
003

0.2724 0.0719 1.2000e-
003

0.0731 238.1853 238.1853 6.0200e-
003

5.6500e-
003
240.0185
Total 0.0945 0.0509 0.7602 2.3100e-
003

0.2711 1.3000e-
003

0.2724 0.0719 1.2000e-
003

0.0731 238.1853 238.1853 6.0200e-
003

5.6500e-
003
240.0185
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 48.0712 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e-
003

0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 48.2520 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e-
003

0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:40 AMPage 23 of 31 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 545

0.2570 1.3000e-
003

0.2583 0.0684 1.2000e-
003

0.0696 238.1853 238.1853 6.0200e-
003

5.6500e-
003
240.0185
Total 0.0945 0.0509 0.7602 2.3100e-
003

0.2570 1.3000e-
003

0.2583 0.0684 1.2000e-
003

0.0696 238.1853 238.1853 6.0200e-
003

5.6500e-
003
240.0185
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:40 AMPage 24 of 31 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 546

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 3.1187 5.8556 27.0541 0.0636 5.8298 0.0668 5.8965 1.5563 0.0630 1.6193 6,588.364 3 6,588.364
3 0.3345 0.3905 6,713.089
7 Unmitigated 3.1187 5.8556 27.0541 0.0636 5.8298 0.0668 5.8965 1.5563 0.0630 1.6193 6,588.364 3 6,588.364
3 0.3345 0.3905 6,713.089
7 4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Apartments Mid Rise 673.53 673.53 673.53 2,185,498 2,185,498 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00
Regional Shopping Center 202.84 202.84 202.84 565,460 565,460 Total 876.37 876.37 876.37 2,750,959 2,750,959
Miles Trip %Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Apartments Mid Rise 10.80 7.30 7.50 44.00 18.80 37.20 100 0 0 Parking Lot 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
Regional Shopping Center 9.50 7.30 7.30 16.30 64.70 19.00 100 0 0

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments Mid Rise 0.490419 0.048398 0.169688 0.158955 0.035733 0.008666 0.009296 0.040569 0.000480 0.000312 0.031681 0.000875 0.004926 Parking Lot 0.490419 0.048398 0.169688 0.158955 0.035733 0.008666 0.009296 0.040569 0.000480 0.000312 0.031681 0.000875 0.004926 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:40 AMPage 25 of 31 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 547

Regional Shopping Center 0.490419 0.048398 0.169688 0.158955 0.035733 0.008666 0.009296 0.040569 0.000480 0.000312 0.031681 0.000875 0.004926

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0392 0.3347 0.1434 2.1400e-
003

0.0271 0.0271 0.0271 0.0271 427.0910 427.0910 8.1900e-
003

7.8300e-
003
429.6290
NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.0392 0.3347 0.1434 2.1400e-
003

0.0271 0.0271 0.0271 0.0271 427.0910 427.0910 8.1900e-
003

7.8300e-
003
429.6290

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:40 AMPage 26 of 31 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 548

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Apartments Mid
Rise
3605.27 0.0389 0.3323 0.1414 2.1200e-
003

0.0269 0.0269 0.0269 0.0269 424.1495 424.1495 8.1300e-
003

7.7800e-
003
426.6700
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Regional
Shopping Center

25.0027 2.7000e-
004

2.4500e-
003

2.0600e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.9000e-
004

2.9415 2.9415 6.0000e-
005

5.0000e-
005

2.9590
Total 0.0392 0.3347 0.1434 2.1300e-
003

0.0271 0.0271 0.0271 0.0271 427.0910 427.0910 8.1900e-
003

7.8300e-
003
429.6290
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:40 AMPage 27 of 31 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 549

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

3.60527 0.0389 0.3323 0.1414 2.1200e-
003

0.0269 0.0269 0.0269 0.0269 424.1495 424.1495 8.1300e-
003

7.7800e-
003
426.6700
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Regional
Shopping Center

0.0250027 2.7000e-
004

2.4500e-
003

2.0600e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.9000e-
004

2.9415 2.9415 6.0000e-
005

5.0000e-
005

2.9590
Total 0.0392 0.3347 0.1434 2.1300e-
003

0.0271 0.0271 0.0271 0.0271 427.0910 427.0910 8.1900e-
003

7.8300e-
003
429.6290
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:40 AMPage 28 of 31 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 550

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 4.4424 0.1495 12.9770 6.9000e-
004

0.0719 0.0719 0.0719 0.0719 0.0000 23.3866 23.3866 0.0225 0.0000 23.9502 Unmitigated 4.4424 0.1495 12.9770 6.9000e-
004

0.0719 0.0719 0.0719 0.0719 0.0000 23.3866 23.3866 0.0225 0.0000 23.9502

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating

0.5663 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

3.4841 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 0.3920 0.1495 12.9770 6.9000e-
004

0.0719 0.0719 0.0719 0.0719 23.3866 23.3866 0.0225 23.9502 Total 4.4424 0.1495 12.9770 6.9000e-
004

0.0719 0.0719 0.0719 0.0719 0.0000 23.3866 23.3866 0.0225 0.0000 23.9502 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:40 AMPage 29 of 31 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 551

Install Low Flow Bathroom Faucet
Install Low Flow Kitchen Faucet
Install Low Flow Toilet
Install Low Flow Shower
Use Water Efficient Irrigation System

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

0.5663 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

0.0719 0.0719 0.0719 0.0719 23.3866 23.3866 0.0225 23.9502 Total 4.4424 0.1495 12.9770 6.9000e-
004

0.0719 0.0719 0.0719 0.0719 0.0000 23.3866 23.3866 0.0225 0.0000 23.9502 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:40 AMPage 30 of 31 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 552

11.0 Vegetation

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
Institute Recycling and Composting Services

8.0 Waste Detail

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:40 AMPage 31 of 31 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Summer
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 553

1550 San Juan
San Benito County, Winter
Project Characteristics -
Land Use -
Construction Phase - Per Construction Questionnaire
Demolition -
Grading -
Vehicle Trips - Per trip gen table
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Per MBARD rul compliance Water Mitigation -
Waste Mitigation - Per AB 939

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
4 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.5 50

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Pacific Gas and Electric Company
2024Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
203.98 0.033CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.004N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:42 AMPage 1 of 31 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 554

2.0 Emissions Summary
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstDustMitigation CleanPavedRoadPercentReduction 0 6 tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadMoistureContent 0 12 tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 43.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 230.00 423.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 10.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 34.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 23.00
tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 7,270.00
tblVehicleTrips DV_TP 11.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips DV_TP 35.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips PB_TP 3.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips PB_TP 11.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 86.00 100.00
tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 54.00 100.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 4.91 4.29
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 46.12 52.01
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 4.09 4.29
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 21.10 52.01
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 5.44 4.29
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 37.75 52.01
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:42 AMPage 2 of 31 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 555

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2022 3.2318 33.1292 21.4790 0.0469 19.8049 1.6134 21.4182 10.1417 1.4843 11.6260 0.0000 4,691.952 9 4,691.952
9 1.1969 0.2729 4,796.727
7 2023 2.1464 16.5813 20.9109 0.0454 1.5831 0.7183 2.3014 0.4255 0.6759 1.1014 0.0000 4,472.143 3 4,472.143
3 0.6501 0.1504 4,533.210
0 2024 50.3573 16.8736 23.0855 0.0501 1.8542 0.6937 2.5479 0.4974 0.6561 1.1535 0.0000 4,938.516 0 4,938.516
0 0.6656 0.1530 5,000.741
7 Maximum 50.3573 33.1292 23.0855 0.0501 19.8049 1.6134 21.4182 10.1417 1.4843 11.6260 0.0000 4,938.516 0 4,938.516
0 1.1969 0.2729 5,000.741
7 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2022 3.2318 33.1292 21.4790 0.0469 8.5435 1.6134 10.1569 4.3561 1.4843 5.8404 0.0000 4,691.952 9 4,691.952
9 1.1969 0.2729 4,796.727
7 2023 2.1464 16.5813 20.9109 0.0454 1.5029 0.7183 2.2212 0.4058 0.6759 1.0817 0.0000 4,472.143 3 4,472.143
3 0.6501 0.1504 4,533.210
0 2024 50.3573 16.8736 23.0855 0.0501 1.7598 0.6937 2.4535 0.4742 0.6561 1.1303 0.0000 4,938.516 0 4,938.516
0 0.6656 0.1530 5,000.741
7 Maximum 50.3573 33.1292 23.0855 0.0501 8.5435 1.6134 10.1569 4.3561 1.4843 5.8404 0.0000 4,938.516 0 4,938.516
0 1.1969 0.2729 5,000.741
7 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:42 AMPage 3 of 31 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 556

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 49.20 0.00 43.54 52.68 0.00 41.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:42 AMPage 4 of 31 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 557

0.0719 0.0719 0.0719 0.0719 0.0000 23.3866 23.3866 0.0225 0.0000 23.9502 Energy 0.0392 0.3347 0.1434 2.1400e-
003

0.0271 0.0271 0.0271 0.0271 427.0910 427.0910 8.1900e-
003

7.8300e-
003
429.6290
Mobile 2.9177 6.5397 29.6008 0.0609 5.8298 0.0668 5.8966 1.5563 0.0630 1.6193 6,311.527 3 6,311.527
3 0.3850 0.4176 6,445.596
9 Total 7.3992 7.0239 42.7213 0.0638 5.8298 0.1658 5.9955 1.5563 0.1620 1.7183 0.0000 6,762.004 9 6,762.004
9 0.4158 0.4254 6,899.176
1 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 4.4424 0.1495 12.9770 6.9000e-
004

0.0719 0.0719 0.0719 0.0719 0.0000 23.3866 23.3866 0.0225 0.0000 23.9502 Energy 0.0392 0.3347 0.1434 2.1400e-
003

0.0271 0.0271 0.0271 0.0271 427.0910 427.0910 8.1900e-
003

7.8300e-
003
429.6290
Mobile 2.9177 6.5397 29.6008 0.0609 5.8298 0.0668 5.8966 1.5563 0.0630 1.6193 6,311.527 3 6,311.527
3 0.3850 0.4176 6,445.596
9 Total 7.3992 7.0239 42.7213 0.0638 5.8298 0.1658 5.9955 1.5563 0.1620 1.7183 0.0000 6,762.004 9 6,762.004
9 0.4158 0.4254 6,899.176
1 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:42 AMPage 5 of 31 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 558

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 317,925; Residential Outdoor: 105,975; Non-Residential Indoor: 5,850; Non-Residential Outdoor: 1,950; Striped Parking Area: 6,912 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 15
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 34
Acres of Paving: 2.59
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:42 AMPage 6 of 31 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 559

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Replace Ground Cover
Water Exposed Area
Water Unpaved Roads
Grading Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 27.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 6 15.00 0.00 909.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 163.00 36.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 33.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:42 AMPage 7 of 31 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 560

3.2 Demolition - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.5875 0.0000 0.5875 0.0890 0.0000 0.0890 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.6392 25.7194 20.5941 0.0388 1.2427 1.2427 1.1553 1.1553 3,746.781 2 3,746.781
2 1.0524 3,773.092
0 Total 2.6392 25.7194 20.5941 0.0388 0.5875 1.2427 1.8301 0.0890 1.1553 1.2442 3,746.781 2 3,746.781
2 1.0524 3,773.092
0 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads
Clean Paved Roads
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:42 AMPage 8 of 31 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 561

0.4254 0.0849 1.6300e-
003

0.0473 4.3200e-
003

0.0517 0.0130 4.1300e-
003

0.0171 173.0433 173.0433 5.2000e-
004

0.0272 181.1625
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0514 0.0381 0.4034 1.0500e-
003

0.1232 6.6000e-
004

0.1239 0.0327 6.1000e-
004

0.0333 106.4388 106.4388 3.9900e-
003

3.5500e-
003
107.5955
Total 0.0613 0.4635 0.4883 2.6800e-
003

0.1706 4.9800e-
003

0.1755 0.0457 4.7400e-
003

0.0504 279.4821 279.4821 4.5100e-
003

0.0308 288.7580
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.2511 0.0000 0.2511 0.0380 0.0000 0.0380 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.6392 25.7194 20.5941 0.0388 1.2427 1.2427 1.1553 1.1553 0.0000 3,746.781 2 3,746.781
2 1.0524 3,773.092
0 Total 2.6392 25.7194 20.5941 0.0388 0.2511 1.2427 1.4938 0.0380 1.1553 1.1933 0.0000 3,746.781 2 3,746.781
2 1.0524 3,773.092
0 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:42 AMPage 9 of 31 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 562

0.4254 0.0849 1.6300e-
003

0.0452 4.3200e-
003

0.0495 0.0125 4.1300e-
003

0.0166 173.0433 173.0433 5.2000e-
004

0.0272 181.1625
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0514 0.0381 0.4034 1.0500e-
003

0.1168 6.6000e-
004

0.1175 0.0311 6.1000e-
004

0.0317 106.4388 106.4388 3.9900e-
003

3.5500e-
003
107.5955
Total 0.0613 0.4635 0.4883 2.6800e-
003

0.1620 4.9800e-
003

0.1670 0.0436 4.7400e-
003

0.0483 279.4821 279.4821 4.5100e-
003

0.0308 288.7580
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.3 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 19.6570 0.0000 19.6570 10.1025 0.0000 10.1025 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 1.6126 1.6126 1.4836 1.4836 3,686.061 9 3,686.061
9 1.1922 3,715.865
5 Total 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 19.6570 1.6126 21.2696 10.1025 1.4836 11.5860 3,686.061 9 3,686.061
9 1.1922 3,715.865
5 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:42 AMPage 10 of 31 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 563

3.3 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0617 0.0457 0.4840 1.2600e-
003

0.1479 7.9000e-
004

0.1487 0.0392 7.3000e-
004

0.0400 127.7265 127.7265 4.7900e-
003

4.2600e-
003
129.1146
Total 0.0617 0.0457 0.4840 1.2600e-
003

0.1479 7.9000e-
004

0.1487 0.0392 7.3000e-
004

0.0400 127.7265 127.7265 4.7900e-
003

4.2600e-
003
129.1146
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.4034 0.0000 8.4034 4.3188 0.0000 4.3188 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 1.6126 1.6126 1.4836 1.4836 0.0000 3,686.061 9 3,686.061
9 1.1922 3,715.865
5 Total 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 8.4034 1.6126 10.0159 4.3188 1.4836 5.8024 0.0000 3,686.061 9 3,686.061
9 1.1922 3,715.865
5 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:42 AMPage 11 of 31 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 564

3.3 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0617 0.0457 0.4840 1.2600e-
003

0.1402 7.9000e-
004

0.1410 0.0373 7.3000e-
004

0.0381 127.7265 127.7265 4.7900e-
003

4.2600e-
003
129.1146
Total 0.0617 0.0457 0.4840 1.2600e-
003

0.1402 7.9000e-
004

0.1410 0.0373 7.3000e-
004

0.0381 127.7265 127.7265 4.7900e-
003

4.2600e-
003
129.1146
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 7.1111 0.0000 7.1111 3.4291 0.0000 3.4291 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.9486 20.8551 15.2727 0.0297 0.9409 0.9409 0.8656 0.8656 2,872.046 4 2,872.046
4 0.9289 2,895.268
4 Total 1.9486 20.8551 15.2727 0.0297 7.1111 0.9409 8.0520 3.4291 0.8656 4.2946 2,872.046 4 2,872.046
4 0.9289 2,895.268
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:42 AMPage 12 of 31 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 565

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0977 4.2126 0.8404 0.0162 0.4688 0.0428 0.5115 0.1286 0.0409 0.1695 1,713.467 7 1,713.467
7 5.1800e-
003

0.2694 1,793.863
8 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0514 0.0381 0.4034 1.0500e-
003

0.1232 6.6000e-
004

0.1239 0.0327 6.1000e-
004

0.0333 106.4388 106.4388 3.9900e-
003

3.5500e-
003
107.5955
Total 0.1491 4.2507 1.2438 0.0172 0.5920 0.0434 0.6354 0.1613 0.0415 0.2028 1,819.906 5 1,819.906
5 9.1700e-
003

0.2729 1,901.459
3 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 3.0400 0.0000 3.0400 1.4659 0.0000 1.4659 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.9486 20.8551 15.2727 0.0297 0.9409 0.9409 0.8656 0.8656 0.0000 2,872.046 4 2,872.046
4 0.9289 2,895.268
4 Total 1.9486 20.8551 15.2727 0.0297 3.0400 0.9409 3.9809 1.4659 0.8656 2.3315 0.0000 2,872.046 4 2,872.046
4 0.9289 2,895.268
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:42 AMPage 13 of 31 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 566

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0977 4.2126 0.8404 0.0162 0.4476 0.0428 0.4903 0.1234 0.0409 0.1643 1,713.467 7 1,713.467
7 5.1800e-
003

0.2694 1,793.863
8 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0514 0.0381 0.4034 1.0500e-
003

0.1168 6.6000e-
004

0.1175 0.0311 6.1000e-
004

0.0317 106.4388 106.4388 3.9900e-
003

3.5500e-
003
107.5955
Total 0.1491 4.2507 1.2438 0.0172 0.5644 0.0434 0.6078 0.1545 0.0415 0.1960 1,819.906 5 1,819.906
5 9.1700e-
003

0.2729 1,901.459
3 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Paving - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.1028 11.1249 14.5805 0.0228 0.5679 0.5679 0.5225 0.5225 2,207.660 3 2,207.660
3 0.7140 2,225.510
4 Paving 0.2950 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.3979 11.1249 14.5805 0.0228 0.5679 0.5679 0.5225 0.5225 2,207.660 3 2,207.660
3 0.7140 2,225.510
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:42 AMPage 14 of 31 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 567

0.1232 6.6000e-
004

0.1239 0.0327 6.1000e-
004

0.0333 106.4388 106.4388 3.9900e-
003

3.5500e-
003
107.5955
Total 0.0514 0.0381 0.4034 1.0500e-
003

0.1232 6.6000e-
004

0.1239 0.0327 6.1000e-
004

0.0333 106.4388 106.4388 3.9900e-
003

3.5500e-
003
107.5955
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.1028 11.1249 14.5805 0.0228 0.5679 0.5679 0.5225 0.5225 0.0000 2,207.660 3 2,207.660
3 0.7140 2,225.510
4 Paving 0.2950 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.3979 11.1249 14.5805 0.0228 0.5679 0.5679 0.5225 0.5225 0.0000 2,207.660 3 2,207.660
3 0.7140 2,225.510
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:42 AMPage 15 of 31 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 568

0.1168 6.6000e-
004

0.1175 0.0311 6.1000e-
004

0.0317 106.4388 106.4388 3.9900e-
003

3.5500e-
003
107.5955
Total 0.0514 0.0381 0.4034 1.0500e-
003

0.1168 6.6000e-
004

0.1175 0.0311 6.1000e-
004

0.0317 106.4388 106.4388 3.9900e-
003

3.5500e-
003
107.5955
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.6 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:42 AMPage 16 of 31 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 569

3.6 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0930 2.2056 0.7323 7.7300e-
003

0.2441 0.0236 0.2677 0.0703 0.0226 0.0929 815.2710 815.2710 5.1000e- 003

0.1188 850.7938
Worker 0.5586 0.4139 4.3833 0.0114 1.3390 7.1900e-
003

1.3462 0.3552 6.6300e-
003

0.3618 1,156.634
8 1,156.634
8 0.0434 0.0385 1,169.204
0 Total 0.6516 2.6195 5.1156 0.0191 1.5831 0.0308 1.6139 0.4255 0.0292 0.4547 1,971.905 8 1,971.905
8 0.0485 0.1573 2,019.997
7 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:42 AMPage 17 of 31 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 570

3.6 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0930 2.2056 0.7323 7.7300e-
003

0.2337 0.0236 0.2573 0.0677 0.0226 0.0903 815.2710 815.2710 5.1000e- 003

0.1188 850.7938
Worker 0.5586 0.4139 4.3833 0.0114 1.2692 7.1900e-
003

1.2764 0.3380 6.6300e-
003

0.3447 1,156.634
8 1,156.634
8 0.0434 0.0385 1,169.204
0 Total 0.6516 2.6195 5.1156 0.0191 1.5029 0.0308 1.5337 0.4058 0.0292 0.4350 1,971.905 8 1,971.905
8 0.0485 0.1573 2,019.997
7 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.6 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:42 AMPage 18 of 31 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 571

3.6 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0557 1.8350 0.6383 7.4900e-
003

0.2441 0.0118 0.2559 0.0703 0.0113 0.0816 789.8509 789.8509 3.2900e- 003

0.1150 824.1985
Worker 0.5179 0.3615 4.0287 0.0110 1.3390 6.7800e-
003

1.3458 0.3552 6.2500e-
003

0.3614 1,127.082
4 1,127.082
4 0.0390 0.0354 1,138.605
4 Total 0.5736 2.1964 4.6669 0.0185 1.5831 0.0186 1.6017 0.4255 0.0175 0.4430 1,916.933 4 1,916.933
4 0.0423 0.1504 1,962.804
0 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:42 AMPage 19 of 31 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 572

3.6 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0557 1.8350 0.6383 7.4900e-
003

0.2337 0.0118 0.2455 0.0677 0.0113 0.0790 789.8509 789.8509 3.2900e- 003

0.1150 824.1985
Worker 0.5179 0.3615 4.0287 0.0110 1.2692 6.7800e-
003

1.2760 0.3380 6.2500e-
003

0.3443 1,127.082
4 1,127.082
4 0.0390 0.0354 1,138.605
4 Total 0.5736 2.1964 4.6669 0.0185 1.5029 0.0186 1.5214 0.4058 0.0175 0.4233 1,916.933 4 1,916.933
4 0.0423 0.1504 1,962.804
0 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.6 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Total 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:42 AMPage 20 of 31 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 573

3.6 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0527 1.8280 0.6090 7.3900e-
003

0.2441 0.0117 0.2558 0.0703 0.0112 0.0815 779.1132 779.1132 3.0700e- 003

0.1136 813.0452
Worker 0.4833 0.3185 3.7420 0.0107 1.3390 6.4300e-
003

1.3454 0.3552 5.9200e-
003

0.3611 1,099.631
1 1,099.631
1 0.0352 0.0327 1,110.266
7 Total 0.5360 2.1466 4.3510 0.0181 1.5831 0.0181 1.6012 0.4255 0.0171 0.4426 1,878.744 3 1,878.744
3 0.0383 0.1463 1,923.311
8 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 0.0000 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Total 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 0.0000 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:42 AMPage 21 of 31 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 574

3.6 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0527 1.8280 0.6090 7.3900e-
003

0.2337 0.0117 0.2454 0.0677 0.0112 0.0789 779.1132 779.1132 3.0700e- 003

0.1136 813.0452
Worker 0.4833 0.3185 3.7420 0.0107 1.2692 6.4300e-
003

1.2756 0.3380 5.9200e-
003

0.3440 1,099.631
1 1,099.631
1 0.0352 0.0327 1,110.266
7 Total 0.5360 2.1466 4.3510 0.0181 1.5029 0.0181 1.5210 0.4058 0.0171 0.4229 1,878.744 3 1,878.744
3 0.0383 0.1463 1,923.311
8 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 48.2520 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e-
003

0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:42 AMPage 22 of 31 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 575

0.2711 1.3000e-
003

0.2724 0.0719 1.2000e-
003

0.0731 222.6247 222.6247 7.1300e-
003

6.6300e-
003
224.7779
Total 0.0979 0.0645 0.7576 2.1600e-
003

0.2711 1.3000e-
003

0.2724 0.0719 1.2000e-
003

0.0731 222.6247 222.6247 7.1300e-
003

6.6300e-
003
224.7779
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 48.0712 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e-
003

0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 48.2520 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e-
003

0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:42 AMPage 23 of 31 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 576

0.2570 1.3000e-
003

0.2583 0.0684 1.2000e-
003

0.0696 222.6247 222.6247 7.1300e-
003

6.6300e-
003
224.7779
Total 0.0979 0.0645 0.7576 2.1600e-
003

0.2570 1.3000e-
003

0.2583 0.0684 1.2000e-
003

0.0696 222.6247 222.6247 7.1300e-
003

6.6300e-
003
224.7779
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:42 AMPage 24 of 31 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 577

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 2.9177 6.5397 29.6008 0.0609 5.8298 0.0668 5.8966 1.5563 0.0630 1.6193 6,311.527 3 6,311.527
3 0.3850 0.4176 6,445.596
9 Unmitigated 2.9177 6.5397 29.6008 0.0609 5.8298 0.0668 5.8966 1.5563 0.0630 1.6193 6,311.527 3 6,311.527
3 0.3850 0.4176 6,445.596
9 4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments Mid Rise 0.490419 0.048398 0.169688 0.158955 0.035733 0.008666 0.009296 0.040569 0.000480 0.000312 0.031681 0.000875 0.004926 Parking Lot 0.490419 0.048398 0.169688 0.158955 0.035733 0.008666 0.009296 0.040569 0.000480 0.000312 0.031681 0.000875 0.004926 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:42 AMPage 25 of 31 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 578

Regional Shopping Center 0.490419 0.048398 0.169688 0.158955 0.035733 0.008666 0.009296 0.040569 0.000480 0.000312 0.031681 0.000875 0.004926

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0392 0.3347 0.1434 2.1400e-
003

0.0271 0.0271 0.0271 0.0271 427.0910 427.0910 8.1900e-
003

7.8300e-
003
429.6290
NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.0392 0.3347 0.1434 2.1400e-
003

0.0271 0.0271 0.0271 0.0271 427.0910 427.0910 8.1900e-
003

7.8300e-
003
429.6290

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:42 AMPage 26 of 31 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 579

0.0269 0.0269 0.0269 0.0269 424.1495 424.1495 8.1300e-
003

7.7800e-
003
426.6700
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Regional
Shopping Center

25.0027 2.7000e-
004

2.4500e-
003

2.0600e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.9000e-
004

2.9415 2.9415 6.0000e-
005

5.0000e-
005

2.9590
Total 0.0392 0.3347 0.1434 2.1300e-
003

0.0271 0.0271 0.0271 0.0271 427.0910 427.0910 8.1900e-
003

7.8300e-
003
429.6290
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:42 AMPage 27 of 31 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 580

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

3.60527 0.0389 0.3323 0.1414 2.1200e-
003

0.0269 0.0269 0.0269 0.0269 424.1495 424.1495 8.1300e-
003

7.7800e-
003
426.6700
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Regional
Shopping Center

0.0250027 2.7000e-
004

2.4500e-
003

2.0600e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.9000e-
004

2.9415 2.9415 6.0000e-
005

5.0000e-
005

2.9590
Total 0.0392 0.3347 0.1434 2.1300e-
003

0.0271 0.0271 0.0271 0.0271 427.0910 427.0910 8.1900e-
003

7.8300e-
003
429.6290
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:42 AMPage 28 of 31 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 581

0.0719 0.0719 0.0719 0.0719 0.0000 23.3866 23.3866 0.0225 0.0000 23.9502 Unmitigated 4.4424 0.1495 12.9770 6.9000e-
004

0.0719 0.0719 0.0719 0.0719 0.0000 23.3866 23.3866 0.0225 0.0000 23.9502

0.5663 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

0.0719 0.0719 0.0719 0.0719 23.3866 23.3866 0.0225 23.9502 Total 4.4424 0.1495 12.9770 6.9000e-
004

0.0719 0.0719 0.0719 0.0719 0.0000 23.3866 23.3866 0.0225 0.0000 23.9502 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:42 AMPage 29 of 31 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 582

Install Low Flow Bathroom Faucet
Install Low Flow Kitchen Faucet
Install Low Flow Toilet
Install Low Flow Shower
Use Water Efficient Irrigation System

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

0.5663 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

0.0719 0.0719 0.0719 0.0719 23.3866 23.3866 0.0225 23.9502 Total 4.4424 0.1495 12.9770 6.9000e-
004

0.0719 0.0719 0.0719 0.0719 0.0000 23.3866 23.3866 0.0225 0.0000 23.9502 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:42 AMPage 30 of 31 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 583

11.0 Vegetation

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
Institute Recycling and Composting Services

8.0 Waste Detail

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:42 AMPage 31 of 31 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Winter
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 584

Appendix B
Cultural Resources Assessment
E.3.d
Packet Pg. 585

12801
1 August 2020

August 28, 2020 12801
Tad Stern
Kimley-Horn
824 Bay Avenue, Suite 10
Capitola, CA 95010

Subject: Cultural resources assessment for the Sanchez-Mesa Apartment Project, City of Hollister, California Dear Mr. Stern:

Dudek has completed a Phase I cultural resources assessment for the Sanchez-Mesa Apartment project located in the City of Hollister. The Project includes demolition of one existing structure and construction of a 157-unit apartment complex with related parking and landscaping improvements (Project).

The assessment included a records search of the California Historical Resource Information system (CHRIS) for known cultural resources, a Sacred Lands File (SLF) search through the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), outreach to local Native American groups and local historical societies, and an intensive pedestrian survey of the Project location for evidence of unknown cultural resources. The purpose of the assessment was to determine if any potentially significant cultural resources are present that might be impacted by the Project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and relevant local ordinances.

The results of this assessment suggest there is low potential for encountering cultural resources during the planned construction. The one structure on the property (P-35-000564) was recorded in 2013 and found not eligible for the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHP) (Hudlow 2013). The structure does not have a local historic resource designation. The Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) Sacred Lands File (SLF) search was positive for tribal cultural resources, with the Amah Mutsun Tribal Band listed as the contact. During Dudek’s outreach effort, the Amah Mutsun Tribal Band recommended monitoring by an Amah Mutsun Tribal Band member for the Project. The survey of the Project location was negative for potentially significant cultural resources. 1 Project Description and Location
The proposed Project includes demolition of one existing structure and construction of a 157-unit apartment complex with related parking and landscaping improvements on an existing 5.5-acre parcel (Project Area). The Project Area is located on the south side of San Juan Road at 1550 San Juan Road, approximately 800 feet west of Live Oak Drive in the southwest portion of the City of Hollister, California. The subject property is found on the E.3.d
Packet Pg. 586

Mr. Stern
Subject: Archeological Assessment for the Sanchez-Mesa Apartments, Hollister, California 12801
2 August 2020
USGS Hollister 7.5-minute topographic Quad (Figure 1). The subject parcel is currently designated as Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) 052-090-008.
2 Regulatory Context
State of California
The California Register of Historical Resources
In California, the term “historical resource” includes “any object, building, structure, site, area, place, record, or manuscript which is historically or archaeologically significant, or is significant in the architectural, engineering, scientific, economic, agricultural, educational, social, political, military, or cultural an nals of California” (Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 5020.1(j)). In 1992, the California legislature established the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) “to be used by state and local agencies, private groups, and citizens to identify the state’s historical resources and to indicate what properties are to be protected, to the extent prudent and feasible, from substantial adverse change” (PRC Section 5024.1(a)). The criteria for listing resources on the CRHR, enumerated in the following text, were developed to be in accordance with previously established criteria developed for listing in the NRHP. According to PRC Section 5024.1(c)(1–4), a resource is considered historically significant if it (i) retains “substantial integrity,” and (ii) meets at least one of the following criteria:
(1) Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California’s history and cultural heritage
(2) Is associated with the lives of persons important in our past (3) Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values (4) Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history To understand the historic importance of a resource, sufficient time must have passed to obtain a scholarly perspective on the events or individuals associated with the resource. A resource less than 50 years old may be considered for listing in the CRHR if it can be demonstrated that sufficient time has passed to understand its historical importance (see 14 CCR 4852(d)(2)).

The CRHR protects cultural resources by requiring evaluations of the significance of prehistoric and historic resources. The criteria for the CRHR are nearly identical to those for the NRHP, and properties listed or formally designated as eligible for listing in the NRHP are automatically listed in the CRHR, as are state landmarks and points of interest. The CRHR also includes properties designated under local ordinances or identified through local historical resource surveys.

California Environmental Quality Act
As described further in the following text, the following CEQA statutes and CEQA Guidelines are of relev ance to the analysis of archaeological, historic, and tribal cultural resources:

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 587

Mr. Stern
Subject: Archeological Assessment for the Sanchez-Mesa Apartments, Hollister, California 12801
3 August 2020
PRC Section 21083.2(g) defines “unique archaeological resource.” PRC Section 21084.1 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(a) define “historical resources.” In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(b) defines the phrase “substantial adverse change in the significance of an historical resource.” It also defines the circumstances when a project would materially impair the significance of a historical resource.

PRC Section 21074(a) defines “tribal cultural resources.” PRC Section 5097.98 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(e) set forth standards and steps to be employed following the accidental discovery of human remains in any location other than a dedicated ceremony.

PRC Sections 21083.2(b)–(c) and CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.4 provide information regarding the mitigation framework for archaeological and historic resources, including examples of preservation -in-place mitigation measures; preservation-in-place is the preferred manner of mitigating impacts to significant archaeological sites because it maintains the relationship between artifacts and the archaeological context, and may also help avoid conflict with religious or cultural values of groups associated with the archaeological site(s).

Under CEQA, a project may have a significant effect on the environment if it may cause “a substantial adverse change in the significance of an historical resource” (PRC Section 21084.1; CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(b)).

If a site is either listed or eligible for listing in the CRHR, or if it is included in a local register of historic resources, or identified as significant in a historical resources survey (meeting the requirements of PRC Section 5024.1(q)), it is a “historical resource” and is presumed to be historically or culturally significant for purposes of CEQA (PRC Section 21084.1; CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(a)). The lead agency is not precluded from determining that a resource is a historical resource, even if it does not fall within this presumption (PRC Section 21084.1; CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(a)).

A “substantial adverse change in the significance of an historical resource” reflecting a significant effect under CEQA means “physical demolition, destruction, relocation, or alteration of the resource or its immediate surroundings such that the significance of an historical resource would be materially impaired” (CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(b)(1); PRC Section 5020.1(q)). In turn, the significance of a historical resource is materially impaired when a project does any of the following:
(1) Demolishes or materially alters in an adverse manner those physical characteristics of an historical resource that convey its historical significance and that justify its in clusion in, or eligibility for, inclusion in the California Register; or
(2) Demolishes or materially alters in an adverse manner those physical characteristics that account for its inclusion in a local register of historical resources pursuant to Section 5020.1(k) of the PRC or its identification in an historical resources survey meeting the requirements of Section 5024.1(g) of the PRC, unless the public agency reviewing the effects of the project establishes by a preponderance of evidence that the resource is not historically or culturally significant; or (3) Demolishes or materially alters in an adverse manner those physical characteristics of a historical resource that convey its historical significance and that justify its eligibility for inclusion in the E.3.d
Packet Pg. 588

Mr. Stern
Subject: Archeological Assessment for the Sanchez-Mesa Apartments, Hollister, California 12801
4 August 2020
California Register as determined by a lead agency for purposes of CEQA [CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(b)(2)].

Pursuant to these sections, the CEQA inquiry begins with evaluating whether a project site contains any “historical resources,” then evaluates whether that project will cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource such that the resource’s historical significance is materially impaired.

If it can be demonstrated that a project will cause damage to a unique archaeological resource, the lead agency may require reasonable efforts be made to permit any or all of these resources to be preserved in place or left in an undisturbed state. To the extent that they cannot be left undisturbed, mitigation measures are requi red (Section 21083.2(a), (b), and (c)).

Section 21083.2(g) defines a unique archaeological resource as an archaeological artifact, object, or site about which it can be clearly demonstrated that without merely adding to the current body of knowledge, ther e is a high probability that it meets any of the following criteria:
(1) Contains information needed to answer important scientific research questions and that there is a demonstrable public interest in that information
(2) Has a special and particular quality such as being the oldest of its type or the best available example of its type
(3) Is directly associated with a scientifically recognized important prehistoric or historic event or person
Impacts to non-unique archaeological resources are generally not considered a significant environmental impact (PRC Section 21083.2(a); CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(c)(4)). However, if a non-unique archaeological resource qualifies as tribal cultural resource (PRC 21074(c); 21083.2(h)), further consideration of significant impacts is required.

CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5 assigns special importance to human remains and specifies procedures to be used when Native American remains are discovered. As described in the following text, these procedures are detailed in PRC Section 5097.98.

Native American Historic Cultural Sites
State law (PRC Section 5097 et seq.) addresses the disposition of Native American burials in archaeological sites and protects such remains from disturbance, vandalism, or inadvertent destruction; establishes procedures to be implemented if Native American skeletal remains are discovered during construction of a project; and established the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) to resolve disputes regarding the disposition of such remains. In addition, the Native American Historic Resource Protection Act makes it a misdemeanor punishable by up to 1 year in jail to deface or destroy an Indian historic or cultural site that is listed or may be eligible for listing in the CRHR.

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 589

Mr. Stern
Subject: Archeological Assessment for the Sanchez-Mesa Apartments, Hollister, California 12801
5 August 2020
California Health and Safety Code section 7050.5
In the event that Native American human remains or related cultural material are encountered, Section 15064.5(e) of the CEQA Guidelines (as incorporated from PRC Section 5097.98) and California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 define the subsequent protocol. If human remains are encountered, excavation or other disturbances shall be suspended of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent human remains or related material. Protocol requires that a county-approved coroner be contacted in order to determine if the remains are of Native American origin. Should the coroner determine the remains to be Native American, the coroner must contact the NAHC within 24 hours. The NAHC will assign a most likely descendent, who may make recommendations to the landowner or the person responsible for the excavation work, for means of treating, with appropriate dignity, the human remains and any associated grave goods as provided in PRC Section 5097.98 (14 CCR 15064.5(e)).

City of Hollister Regulations
The City of Hollister Code of Ordinances addresses inadvertent archaeological and historic resources discovery in Section 17.16.030 (Archaeological and Historic Resources). The ordinance directs that the City of Hollister Planning Department should be notified and the disposition of found artifacts must be incompliance with applicable State and Federal laws. The treatment of historic resources is more particularly described in Code Section 15.16 (Historic Resources).
3 Environmental Context
The Project Area lies about 270 feet above sea level approximately 20 miles east of the Pacific Ocean at Monterey Bay. The land in the Project vicinity is flat and situated in the western portion of the Hollister Valley between the Diablo Range to the east and the Gabilan Range to the west. The San Benito River trends southeast to northwest approximately 1.500 feet southwest of the Project Area. Landforms in the vicinity include moderate to severe grades in the Gabilan and Diablo Ranges and flat valley floors between the ranges. Soil within the Project Area is Sorrento lilt loam, 0-2 percent, in the north portion and Reiff sandy loam, 0-2 percent in the south portion (SoilWeb 2020).

The region’s native blue oak-digger pine forest plant community (Küchler 1977) has largely been replaced by trees and grasses introduced by agricultural and suburban land use development. 4 Cultural Setting
Prehistory
The prehistory of indigenous groups living within San Benito County follows general patterns identified within the archaeological record of the greater Central Coast area of California. These patterns represent adaptive shifts in settlement, subsistence strategies and technological innovation demonstrated by prehistoric people throughout the Holocene and earlier. The California Central Coast Chronology (Jones et al. 2007) presents an overview of prehistoric life ranging upwards of 10,000 years. Six temporal periods describe changes in prehistoric settlement patterns, subsistence practices, and technological advances (Table 1).

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 590

Mr. Stern
Subject: Archeological Assessment for the Sanchez-Mesa Apartments, Hollister, California 12801
6 August 2020
Table 1. California Central Coast Chronology
Temporal Period Date (BC-AD) Date (BP) Artifact Assemblage Example Sites Paleo-Indian
(highly-mobile)
pre-8000 BC 10,000 BP or
older
Isolated fluted points, sparse lithic scatters Possibly SCL-178 and SCR- 177
Millingstone/ Early
Archaic
(highly mobile)
8000 - 3500
BC
5,500 –
10,000 BP
Millingstones/handstones, core-cobble tools,
lanceolate or large side-notched projectile points,
eccentric crescents, Olivella beads: thick
rectangular (L-series)
SCL-65, SCL-178, SCL-237,
SCR-7, SCR-60/130, SMA-134,
MNT-229
Early
(sites in more
varied contexts)
3500 - 600
BC
2,600 – 5500
BP
Mortar and pestle introduced, formalized flaked
stone tools (Rossi Square-stemmed and Año
Nuevo long-stem points), Olivella beads: Spire-
lopped (A), End-ground (B2b and B2c), Cap (B4),
and Rectangular (L-series)
SCL-33, SCL-178, SCL-163,
SCR-7, SCR-38/123, MNT-108,
MNT-238, MNT-391, MNT-1918
Middle
(more long-term
residences)
600 BC to AD
1000
950 – 2,600
BP
Mortars and pestles (but still some
millingstone/handstones), contracting-stemmed
projectile points, greater variety of Olivella shell
beads, Haliotis ornaments, circular shell
fishhooks, bone tools, grooved stone net sinkers
SCL-178, SCL-163, SCL-613,
SCR-9, SMA-77, SMA-218,
MNT-101, MNT-229, MNT-234,
MNT-282
Middle-Late
Transition
(social
reorganization)
AD 1000-
1250
700 – 950 BP Mortars and pestles (but still some
millingstone/handstones), bow/arrow technology
introduced, Olivella shell bead types: B2, B3, G1,
G2, G6, and K1, notched net sinkers, hopper
mortars, and circular shell fishhooks
SCL-690, MNT-1233, MNT-281,
MNT-1754, MNT-745
Late
(more permanent
residential sites
with additional
seasonal sites)
AD 1250-
1769
181 – 700 BP Mortars and pestles (but still some
millingstone/handstones), Cottonwood (or
Canaliño) and Desert Side-notched arrow points,
flaked stone drills, steatite and clamshell disc
beads, Haliotis disc beads, Olivella bead types:

E1, E2, B2, B3, G1, G6, K1 types
SCL-119/SBN-24/H, SCL-272,
SCL-828, SCL-341, SCR-177,
MNT-879, MNT-1765, MNT-
1485/H MNT-1486/H

Paleo-Indian (10,000 BP or older)
The Paleo-Indian era represents people’s initial occupation of the region. These were highly mobile hunters who focused subsistence efforts on large mammals. Multiple migrations into the region may have occurred both terrestrially and by sea (Erlandson et al. 2007). Although no coastal Paleo-Indian sites in the Central California Coast region have been discovered, they may have been inundated as a result of rising ocean levels throughout the Holocene (Jones and Jones 1992).

Evidence of this era is generally found through isolated artifacts or sparse lithic scatters (Bertrando 2004). In the San Luis Obispo area, fluted points characterizing this era are documented near the town of Nipomo (Mills et al. 2005) and Santa Margarita (Gibson 1996), but so far, no fluted points have been found in the Central Coast north of the Santa Barbara area. Possible evidence for Paleo-Indian occupation is reported in buried contexts in CA-SCL- 178 in the Santa Clara Valley and at CA-SCR-177 in Scotts Valley (Cartier 1993). The early radiocarbon dates from charcoal, however, pose questions of validity (Jones et al. 2007).

Millingstone (5,500 – 10,000 BP)
Settlement in the Central Coast appears with more frequency in the Millingstone Period. Sites of this era have been discovered in Big Sur (Jones 1993; Jones 2003; Fitzgerald and Jones 1999), Moss Landing (Dietz et al. 1988; Jones E.3.d
Packet Pg. 591

Mr. Stern
Subject: Archeological Assessment for the Sanchez-Mesa Apartments, Hollister, California 12801
7 August 2020
and Jones 1992; Milliken et al. 1999), Watsonville (Culleton et al. 2005) and in the Coyote Creek area of Santa Clara (Hildebrandt and Mikkelsen 1993). Similar to the Paleo-Indian era, people living during the Millingstone era were likely highly mobile. Assemblages are characterized by abundant millingstones and handstones, cores and core-cobble tools, thick rectangular (L-series) Olivella beads, and a low incidence of projectile points, which are generally lanceolate or large side-notched varieties (Jones et al. 2007). Eccentric crescents are also found in Millingstone components. Sites are often associated with shellfish remains and small mammal bone, which suggest a collecting-focused economy. Stable isotope studies on human bone, from a coastal Millingstone component at CA-SCR-60/130, indicate a diet composed of 70%–84% marine resources (Newsome et al. 2004). Contrary to these findings, deer remains are abundant at other Millingstone sites (cf. Jones et al. 2008), which suggests a flexible subsistence focus.

Early (2,600 – 5500 BP)
The Early Period corresponds with the earliest era the “Hunting Culture” which continues through the Middle -Late Transition (Rogers 1929). The Early Period is marked by a greater emphasis on formalized flaked stone tools, such as projectile points and bifaces, and the initial use of mortar and pestle technology. Early Period sites are located in more varied environmental contexts than millingstone sites, suggesting more intensive use of the landscape than practiced previously (Jones and Waugh 1997).

Early Period artifact assemblages are characterized by Large Side-notched points, Rossi Square-stemmed points, Spire-lopped (A), End-ground (B2b and B2c), Cap (B4), and Rectangular (L-series) Olivella beads. Other artifacts include less temporally diagnostic Contracting-stemmed and Año Nuevo long-stemmed points, and bone gorges.

Ground stone artifacts are less common relative to flaked stone tools when compared with Millingstone-era sites.

Early Period sites are common and often found in estuary settings along the coast or along river terraces inland.

Coastal sites dating to this period include CA-MNT-108 (Breschini and Haversat 1992a), CA-SCR-7 (Jones and Hildebrandt 1990), and CA-SCR-38/123 (Bryne 2002, Jones and Hildebrandt 1994). Inland sites include CA-SCL- 33, CA-SCL-178 and CA-SCL-163 (Hildebrandt and Mikkelsen 1993).

Archaeologists have long debated whether the shift in site locations and artifact assemblages during this time represent either population intrusion as a result of mid-Holocene warming trends, or an in-situ adaptive shift (cf.

Mikkelsen et al. 2000). The initial use of mortars and pestles during this time appears to reflect a more labor intensive economy associated with the adoption of acorn processing (cf. Basgall 1987).

Middle (950 – 2,600 BP)
The trend toward greater labor investment is apparent in the Middle Period. During this time, there is increased use of plant resources, more long-term occupation at habitation sites, and a greater variety of smaller “use -specific” localities. Artifacts common to this era include Contracting-stemmed projectile points, a greater variety of Olivella shell beads and Haliotis ornaments that include discs and rings (Jones 2003). Bone tools and ornaments are also common, especially in the richer coastal contexts (Jones and Ferneau 2002a; Jones and Waugh 1995), and circular shell fishhooks are present for the first time. Grooved stone net sinkers are also found in coastal sites. Mortars and pestles become more common than millingstones and handstones at some sites (Jones et al. 2007). Important Middle Period sites include CA-MNT-282 at Willow Creek (Jones 2003; Pohorecky 1976), CA-SCR-9 in the Santa E.3.d
Packet Pg. 592

Mr. Stern
Subject: Archeological Assessment for the Sanchez-Mesa Apartments, Hollister, California 12801
8 August 2020
Cruz Mountains (Hylkema 1991), CA-SMA 218 at Año Nuevo (Hylkema 1991), CA-SCL-613 at San Francisquito Creek, and a continued presence at SCL-178, SCL-163 (Rosenthal and Meyer 2004).

The Middle Period is a continuation of the “Hunting Culture” because of the greater emphasis on labor-intensive technologies that include projectile and plant processing (Jones et al. 2007; Rogers 1929). Additionally, faunal evidence highlights a shift toward prey species that are more labor intensive to capture, either by search and processing time or technological needs. These labor-intensive species include small schooling fishes, sea otters, rabbits, and plants such as acorn. Early and Middle Period sites are difficult to distinguish without shell beads due to the similarity of artifact assemblages (Jones and Haney 2005).

Middle-Late Transition (700 – 950 BP)
The Middle-Late Transition corresponds with the end of the “Hunting Culture” (Rogers 1929). It also corresponds with social reorganization across the region due to a period of rapid climatic change known as the Medieval Climatic Anomaly (cf. Stine 1994). The Medieval Climatic Anomaly is characterized by drastic fluctuations between cool-wet and warm-dry climatic conditions (Jones et al. 1999). Archaeological sites are rarer du ring this period, which may reflect a decline in regional population (Jones and Ferneau 2002b). Artifacts associated with the Middle -Late Transition include contracting-stemmed, double side-notched, and small leaf-shaped projectile points. The latter are thought to represent the introduction of bow and arrow technology to the region. A variety of Olivella shell bead types are found in these deposits and include B2, B3, G1, G2, G6, and K1 varieties, notched line sinkers, hopper mortars, and circular shell fishhooks (Jones 1995; Jones et al. 2007). Sites that correspond with this time are CA- MNT-1233 and CA-MNT-281 at Willow Creek (Pohorecky 1976), CA-MNT-1754, and CA-MNT-745 in Priest Valley (Hildebrandt 2006) and CA-SCL-690 in San Jose (Hylkema 2007).

Late (181 – 700 BP)
Late Period sites are found in a variety of environmental conditions and include newly occupied task sites and encampments, as well as previously occupied localities. Artifacts associated with this era include Cottonwood (or Canaliño) and Desert Side-notched arrow points, flaked stone drills, steatite and clamshell disc beads, Haliotis disc beads, Olivella bead types E1 and E2, and earlier used B2, B3, G1, G6, and K1 types. Millingstones, handstones, mortars, pestles, and circular shell fishhooks also continue to be used (Jones et al. 2007). Sites dating to this era are found in coastal and interior contexts. Coastal sites dating to the Late Period tend to be resource acquisition or processing sites, while evidence for residential occupation is more common inland (Jones et al. 2007). Late Period sites include CA-MNT-143 at Asilomar State Beach (Brady et al. 2009), CA-MNT-1765 at Moro Cojo Slough (Fitzgerald et al. 1995), CA-MNT-1485/H and -1486/H at Rancho San Carlos (Breschini and Haversat 1992b), and CA-SCR-117 at Davenport Landing (Fitzgerald and Ruby 1997).

The terminal Late Period coincides with the initial Spanish colonization effort in 1769, Milliken (1995) associates the area around Hollister with the Ausaima Tribe of the Ohlone, with their core area east of the San Felipe sink on Pecheco Creek, about nine miles north of the Project Area. The Ausaima people were part of the Mutsun language group within the Ohlone language family (Levy 1978). All of the Ohlone tribes in the greater in the region of what is not the City of Hollister were influence most directly by Mission San Juan Bautista, founded in 1797.

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 593

Mr. Stern
Subject: Archeological Assessment for the Sanchez-Mesa Apartments, Hollister, California 12801
9 August 2020
History
The first European to explore the Monterey Bay was Sebastián Vizcaíno, who, in 1602 was sent by the Spanish government to map the Californian coastline (Holm et al. 2013). It was Vizcaíno who named the area “Puerto de Monterey” after the viceroy of New Spain. In 1769, the Gaspar de Portolá expedition traveled through the region once more, this time by land. Portolá returned again in 1770 to establish both the Monterey Presidio, Spain’s first military base in Alta California, and Mission San Carlos Borreméo de Carmelo. Eventually twenty-two Spanish missions were established in Alta California that drastically altered the lifeways of the Native Americans. The local Ausaima people in the Hollister area were influence most directly by Mission San Juan Bautista, founded in 1797.

The mission leaders moved the Ausaima people into the mission to become Catholic neophytes and 276 Ausaima were baptized from 1797 to 1806 (Milliken 1995).

Mexico won independence from Spain in the 1821 and the Mexican government secularized the mission lands by 1834, freeing the Native Americans from the control of the missions. Mexicans who settled in the region, were given land grants. The Project Area became part of the 34,620 acre Rancho San Justo land grand. During this time the ranching industry fueled the economy with the trade of cattle hides and tallow.

The United States of America acquired California at the end of the Mexican-American War in 1948, and California became a state in 1850. William Hollister purchased the land and founded the City of Hollister in 1868, originally as part of Monterey County. The City of Hollister and the western portion of Sa n Benito County were separated from Monterey County in 1874 an became a new county (McMahon and Sonne 2012). Agriculture remains the predominant industry in the Hollister area, which has a rich history in the production of fruits and nuts as well as ranching.
5 NWIC Records Search Results
In order to identify cultural resources potentially affected by the Project, Dudek defined a records search study area that included the Project Area and a 0.25-mile buffer for resources and cultural studies. On August 13, 2020, NWIC provided Dudek the records search results for the study area (NWIC File No. 20-0028). Additional sources consulted included the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), California Inventory of Histo rical Resources/CRHR, the Built Environment Resource Directory (BERD), and the OHP Archaeological Determinations of Eligibility.

Previously Identified Cultural Resources
There is one previously recorded cultural resource within the Project Area (P-35-000564) and one resource, P-35- 000534, within the records search 0.25-mile buffer (Table 2). P-35-000564, the only structure within the Project Area, is described in detail below.

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 594

Mr. Stern
Subject: Archeological Assessment for the Sanchez-Mesa Apartments, Hollister, California 12801
10 August 2020
Table 2. Previous Identified Cultural Resources within the Records Search Area Primary Trinomial Name Resource Type Age Attributes
Within the Project Area
P-35-000564 - CBH-2 Building Historic HP4; Ancillary Building Within 0.25 miles of the Project Area
P-35-000534 - PA-09-22 Building Historic HP02; HP04; Building

P-35-000564
Resource P-35-000564 is recorded as an agricultural ancillary building located in the west central portion of the subject parcel (Hudlow 2013a and 2013b). The structure is a gabled roof metal frame building clad with vertical hung sheet metal on poured concrete sills. The building can be accessed by two sets of large sliding doors. The first set is at ground level at the south wall. The second set of doors are reached by a loading ramp that rises to a partial second story at the northeast corner of the building. An addition has been constructed at the north end of the west elevation. The site record notes the age of the building as circa 1930s. Records obtained from the San Benito County Assessor’s office indicate the building was “Effective” for tax purposes in 1947, and further suggest the building was originally built for industrial rather than agricultural purposes (San Benito County 2020).

Hudlow (2013a) recorded P-35-000564 during a survey of the subject parcel for a residential development proposed in 2013 and found the resource not eligible for the CRHR (Hudlow 2013b, see S-42057 below). The resource is not listed in the California (San Benito County) Built Environment Resource Directory (BERD). The resource does not have a local historic resource designation under City of Hollister Municipal Code 15.16 (Historic Resources) (Rose Redlich [City of Hollister Planning Department], personal communication, August 26, 2020). Per City of Hollister Municipal Code 15.16.080(a) only the property owner can request a local historic resource designation. The Project, as proposed, includes demolition of this structure.

Previously Conducted Studies
There are three previous studies with some coverage reported for the Project Area. There are an additional five previous studies beyond the Project Area but with coverage reported for some portion of the 0.25-mile study area buffer zone (Table 3). Studies with coverage of the Project Area are discussed below Table 3.

Table 3. Previously Conducted Studies within the Study Area Report
No. Authors Year Title Publisher
Within the Project Area
S-005222 Thomas F. King and
Patricia P. Hickman
1973 Archaeological Impact Evaluation: San Felipe Division, Central Valley Project, Part I; The Southern Santa Clara Valley, California: A General Plan for Archaeology
California State
University, San
Francisco
S-005222a Thomas F. King 1973 Archaeological Impact Evaluation: San Felipe Division, Central Valley Project, Part II: The Direct Impact of San Felipe Division Facilities on Archaeological Resources
California State
University, San
Francisco
S-005222b Gary S. Breschini
and Trudy Haversat
1978 A Preliminary Archaeological Surface Reconnaissance of the San Felipe Division, Central Valley Project, Santa Clara and San Benito Counties, California
Archaeological
Consulting
E.3.d
Packet Pg. 595

Mr. Stern
Subject: Archeological Assessment for the Sanchez-Mesa Apartments, Hollister, California 12801
11 August 2020
S-005222c David M. Van Horn 1980 Archaeological and Historical Investigations in Portions of the Central Valley Project, San Felipe Division
ESCA - Tech Corp
S-042057 Scott M. Hudlow 2013 A Phase I Cultural Resource Survey for Hollister Family Apartments, City of Hollister, California
Hudlow Cultural
Resource Associates
S-044151 Melinda A. Peak 2012 Determination of Eligibility and Effect for the Gardens at San Juan Project, City of Hollister, California
Peak & Associates, Inc.

Within 0.25 miles of the Project Area
S-003274 Laurence W. Spanne 1979 Supplement to Archaeological Survey Report, 05-SBt-156, P.M.

2.2/9.1, San Benito County, 05201-248801 by James McManus Caltrans
S-012886 William Shapiro 1991 Cultural Resources Investigation for the Proposed Gas Line 103 Replacement Project, City of Hollister, San Benito County, California
PAR Environmental
Services, Inc.

S-013334 Archaeological
Resource
Management
1991 Cultural Resource Evaluation of a Parcel Located off Buena Vista Road in the City of Hollister, County of San Benito Archaeological
Resource Management
S-038061 Melinda A. Peak 2010 Determination of Eligibility and Effect for the Hollister Family Apartments Project, City of Hollister, California
Peak & Associates, Inc.

S-046392 John Schlagheck 2014 Archaeological Records Search and Surface Reconnaissance, 1261, 1271, and 1601 Buena Vista Road, County of San Benito, California
Holman & Associates
Archaeological
Consultants

S-5222
This series of reports is from the San Felipe Archaeological Project, an evaluation of the San Felipe Division of the Bureau of Reclamation’s Central Valley Project. S-5222 (King and Hickman 1973) and S-5222a (King 1973) are project impact evaluation plans that contain archaeological and ethnographic background information focused on the lowland areas associated with the upper Pajaro River Valley within southern Santa Clara County including Uvas Creek, Llagas Creek, Pacheco Creek, and the San Benito River. The reports indicate that only sample tracks within the very large study area were subject to archaeological survey. As reported in S-5222b (Breschini and Haversat 1978) a later survey did include approximately 47 miles of the route of water transmission pipeline through the San Felipe portion of the Central Valley Project. The route of the pipeline went around the City of Hollister on the east and south to the San Justo Reservoir. At its closest point the survey was 2.25 miles from the Project Area.

S-42057
This report is from a Phase I cultural resources survey of the same parcel under consideration in this report (1550 San Juan Road; APN 052-090-008). The proposed project, for Hollister Family Apartments, was also a residential development proposal (Hudlow 2013b). Hudlow (2013b) found no evidence of prehistoric cultural materials and recorded one built environment resource, P-35-000564, as an abandoned agricultural ancillary building that was thought to be have been built circa 1930s. Hudlow recommended P-35-000564 as not eligible for the CRFR under any of the four CRHR criteria.

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 596

Mr. Stern
Subject: Archeological Assessment for the Sanchez-Mesa Apartments, Hollister, California 12801
12 August 2020
S-44151
S-44151 is a cultural resources study for a residential development proposal on the 3.5-acre property (1619 San Juan Road; APN 052-090-014) that adjoins the Project Area to the southwest (Peak 2012). No cultural resources of concern were noted within or near the area covered by the report. 6 Sacred Lands File Search and Native American Outreach Dudek requested a NAHC search of their Sacred Lands File (SLF) on July 6, 2020 for the Project Area vicinity. The NAHC provided results on July 8, 2020. The NAHC reported positive results for the SLF search and indicated the Amah Mutsun Tribal Band as the contact for the SLF in this case. The NAHC provided a list of three Native American tribal contacts and recommended all be contacted regarding their local knowledge of cultural and tribal cultural resources.

Dudek sent letters via email to all Native American contacts provided by the NAHC on July 9, 2020. On August 6, 2020, Valentine Lopez, Chair of the Amah Mutsun Tribal Band, provided comments about the project via both telephone and email. Mr. Lopez requested that a member of the Amah Mutsun Tribal Band be present during all ground disturbance for the Project. No other Native American representatives have responded as of August 28, 2020 (Attachment 3).
7 Interested Party Outreach
On August 11, 2020, Dudek sent a contact letter to the San Benito County Historical Society to request information about cultural resources in the Project Area vicinity. The letter contained a brief description of the Project, a map of the Project Area, and an aerial photo of the Project Area. No response has been received as of August 28, 2020 (Attachment 4).
8 Site Reconnaissance
Methods
On August 19, 2020, Dudek archaeologists John Schlagheck, MA, RPA, and Sarah Brewer BA, conducted an intensive pedestrian survey (National Park Service 2020) on all accessible land within the Project Area. The survey included careful inspection for prehistoric and historical period cultural materials, as well as topographic indicators and soil characteristics that might be evidence of subsurface cultural materials. Where partially exposed s oil was encountered, small hand tools were used to increase soil visibility by removing light vegetation, duff, and imported materials such as gravel and modern debris.

Results
Other than built environment resource P-35-000564, Dudek found no evidence for previously unknown potentially significant cultural resources during the survey. Specifically, no archaeological soil (midden) or material commonly used as raw materials for prehistoric tool manufacture such as chert and obsidian were observed. No other evidence for use of the property during prehistoric times (such as charred faunal remains, marine shell, fire affected E.3.d
Packet Pg. 597

Mr. Stern
Subject: Archeological Assessment for the Sanchez-Mesa Apartments, Hollister, California 12801
13 August 2020
rock, or charcoal) was observed. Modern debris, including plastic, wood, and glass fragments, was also observed in numerous locations (Figure 2).

The property is relatively flat with a gentle change in grade between the lower (south) half and the upper (north) half of the property. The grade change runs approximately due east/west with a vertical transition of about 6 feet.

Soil within the lower area is a medium course, very loose sand with rounded and semi rounded pebbles that appears to be a native alluvial deposit. In the upper portion of the property the soil is a medium gray loam with very few rocks.

Near the vehicle entrance at San Juan Road and surrounding the only structure on the property (P-35-000564), there are relative small areas where imported gravel has been used to stabilize the ground for vehicles and outside work/storage areas. One small concrete pad (30 X 25 feet) and some asphalt paving with ill-defined boundaries are located just south and southwest of P-35-000564.

P-35-000564 appears to be in approximately the same condition as when it was recorded in 2013. The building is clearly abandoned and open to the elements at several points, including holes in the metal siding, broken windows, and open sliding doors at ground level on the south façade. 9 Summary
Dudek’s background research and survey found no evidence prehistoric cultural resources within or near the Project Area. The NAHC indicated positive results from the SLF search with the Amah Mutsun Tribal Band listed as the contact. The Amah Mutsun Tribal Band returned comments during Dudek’s outreach effort requesting that a monitor from the Amah Mutsun Tribal Band be on site for all ground disturbance work .

Regarding historical period resources, the only structure on the property (P-35-000564) was recorded and found not eligible for the CRHR in 2013. P-35-000564 does not have a local historic resource designation. The building is abandoned and appears to be in approximately the same condition as it was in 2013. 10 Recommendations
Based on the results of the assessment, the potential for encountering previously unknown potentially significant cultural resources during the planned construction is low. The Project should have conditions to comply with regulations regarding the accidental discovery of intact archaeological deposits and human remains. Specifically, should human remains be discovered at any time, work will halt in that area and procedures set forth in the California Public Resources Code (Section 5097.98) and State Health and Safety Code (Section 7050.5) will be followed, beginning with notification to the San Benito County Coroner and the City of Hollister Planning Department.

If Native American remains are present, the County Coroner will contact the Native American Heritage Commission to designate a Most Likely Descendent (MLD). The MLD will be authorized to provide recommendations for the treatment of Native American human remains and any associated objects and materials.

P-35-000564 is proposed for demolition as part of the Project. The resource was found not eligible for the CRHR in 2013 and does have a local historic resource designation under City of Hollister Municipal Code 15.16. Assignment of the local historic designation is not likely since under City of Hollister Municipal Code 15.16.080(a) only the E.3.d
Packet Pg. 598

Mr. Stern
Subject: Archeological Assessment for the Sanchez-Mesa Apartments, Hollister, California 12801
14 August 2020
property owner can request the local historic resource designation. Therefore no further compliance effort regarding Project impacts to P-35-000564 is warranted.

Should you have any questions relating to this report and its findings please do not hesitate to contact me directly.

Sincerely,
John P. Schlagheck, M.A., RPA
Archaeologist
DUDEK
Office: (831) 345-8715
Cell: (831)-212-3886
Email: [email protected]

Figure 1. Project Location Map
Figure 2. Project Area and Survey Coverage Boundary
Attachment 1. National Archaeological Database Information Attachment 2. NWIC Records Search
Attachment 3. Native American Outreach
Attachment 4. Interested Party Outreach
Attachment 5. Project Photos
cc: Micah Hale, Dudek
Ryan Brady, Dudek
E.3.d
Packet Pg. 599

Mr. Stern
Subject: Archeological Assessment for the Sanchez-Mesa Apartments, Hollister, California 12801
15 August 2020
11 References Cited
Basgall, M.E. 1987. Resource Intensification among Hunter-Gatherers: Acorn Economies in Prehistoric California.

Research in Economic Anthropology 9:21–52.

Bertrando, E. 2004. Evidence and Models for Late Pleistocene Chronology and Settlement along California’s Central Coast. In Emerging from the Ice Age: Early Holocene Occupations on the California Central Coast, edited by Ethan Bertrando and V.A. Levulett, pp. 93–105. San Luis Obispo County Archaeological Society Occasional Papers no. 17.

Brady, R., J. Farquhar, T. Garlinghouse, and C. Peterson. 2009. Archaeological Evaluation of CA-MNT-143 for the Asilomar Boardwalk Replacement Project, Asilomar State Beach, Pacific Grove, California. Albion Environmental, Inc., Santa Cruz. Copies available from the Northwest Information Center, Department of Anthropology, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park.

Breschini, G. and T. Haversat. 1978. A Preliminary Archaeological Surface Reconnaissance of the San Felipe Division, Central Valley Project, Santa Clara and San Benito Counties, California. On file (S-5222b), Northwest Information Center, Sonoma State Universty.

Breschini, G. and T. Haversat. 1992a. Preliminary Excavations at CA-MNT-108, Fisherman’s Wharf, Monterey County, California. In Archaeological Investigations of Some Significant Sites on the Central Coast of California, edited by H. Dallas, Jr. and G.S. Breschini, pp. 39–47. Coyote Press Archives of California Prehistory No. 37, Salinas.

Breschini, G. and T. Haversat. 1992b. Baseline Archaeological Studies at Rancho San Carlos, Carmel Valley, Monterey County, California. Coyote Press Archives of California Prehistory No. 36, Salinas.

Bryne, S. 2002. Archaeological Monitoring of the Wilder Ranch Bike Path Construction and Mitigation Related to Archaeological Site CA-SCR-38/123/H. Garcia and Associates, San Anselmo. Copies available from Northwest Archaeological Information Center, Department of Anthropology, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park, California.

Cartier, R. 1993. The Scotts Valley Site: CA-SCR-177. The Santa Cruz Archaeological Society, Santa Cruz.

Culleton B.J., R.H. Gargett and T.L. Jackson. 2005. Data Recovery Excavations at CA-SCR-60/130 for the Pajaro Valley Water Management Agency Local Water Supply and Distribution Project. On file at University of California Santa Cruz Archaeology Monterey Archive.

Dietz, S.A., W.R. Hildebrandt, and T. Jones 1988. Archaeological Investigations at Elkhorn Slough: CA-MNT-229 A Middle Period Site on the Central California Coast. Papers in Northern California Anthropology, Number 3.

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 600

Mr. Stern
Subject: Archeological Assessment for the Sanchez-Mesa Apartments, Hollister, California 12801
16 August 2020
Erlandson, J.M., M.H. Graham, B.J. Bourque, D. Corbett, J.A. Estes, and R.S. Steneck. 2007. The Kelp Highway Hypothesis: Marine Ecology, the Coastal Migration Theory, and the Peopling of the Americas. The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology 2(2): 161–174.

Fitzgerald, R.T., J.L. Edwards, J.M. Farquhar, and K. Loefler. 1995. Archaeological Test Excavation at CA-MNT- 1765, for the Moro Cojo Standard Subdivision Project (SH93001), Monterey County, California.

Biosystems Analysis, Inc., Santa Cruz. Report on file Northwest Information Center, Department of Anthropology, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park.

Fitzgerald, R.T. and T.L. Jones 1999. The Milling Stone Horizon Revisited: New Perspectives from Northern and Central California. Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 21:65-93.

Fitzgerald, R.T. and A. Ruby. 1997. Archaeological Test Excavations at CA-SCR-117, the Davenport Landing Site.

Garcia and Associates, San Anselmo. Report on file Northwest Information Center, Department of Anthropology, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park.

Gibson, R.O. 1996. Results of Archaeological Monitoring for Unocal Soil Testing Program along Pipelines near Santa Margarita, San Luis Obispo County, California. Gibson’s Archaeological Consulting, Paso Robles.

Report submitted to UNOCAL CERT, San Luis Obispo. Copies available from the Central Coast Information Center, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Santa Barbara.

Hildebrandt, W.R. 2006. Archaeological Evaluation of the Priest Valley Knoll Sites (CA-MNT-745), Eastern Monterey County, California. Far Western Anthropological Research Group, Inc., Davis. Copies available from the Northwest Information Center, Department of Anthropology, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park.

Hildebrandt, W.R. and P.J. Mikkelsen 1993. Archaeological Test Excavations of Fourteen Sites Along Highway 101 and 152, Santa Clara and San Benito Counties, California. Vol. 1, Prehistory. Far Western Anthropological Research Group, Davis. Copies available from California Department of Transportation, Sacramento.

Holm, L., K. Chao and J. Holson. 2013. Archaeological Assessment for the City of Monterey 2013 Sewer Rehabilitation Project, Monterey County, California PL-2616-21 (Updated July 2013). Report on file at the Northwest Information Center, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park.

Hudlow, S. M. 2013a. Site Record for P-35-000564. On file, Northwest Information Center.

Hudlow, S. M. 2013b. A Phase I Cultural Resource Survey for Hollister Family Apartments, City of Hollister, California. On file (S-42057), Northwest Information Center.

Hylkema, M.G. 2007. Santa Clara Valley Prehistory: Archaeological Investigations at CA-SCL-690, the Tamien Station Site, San Jose, California. Center for Archaeological Research at Davis, Publication Number 15, Davis, California.

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 601

Mr. Stern
Subject: Archeological Assessment for the Sanchez-Mesa Apartments, Hollister, California 12801
17 August 2020
Hylkema, M.G. 1991. Prehistoric Native American Adaptations along the Central California Coast of San Mateo and Santa Cruz Counties. Master’s thesis, Department of Anthropology, San Jose State University.

University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.

Jones, T.L. 1993. Big Sur: A Keystone in Central California Culture History. Pacific Coast Archaeological Quarterly, Costa Mesa, California.

Jones, T.L. 1995. Transitions in Prehistoric Diet, Mobility, Exchange, and Social Organization along California’s Big Sur Coast. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Davis.

Jones, T.L. 2003. Prehistoric Human Ecology of the Big Sur Coast, California. Contributions of the University of California Archaeological Research Facility, Berkeley.

Jones, T.L., G. M. Brown, L.M. Raab, J.L. McVickar, W.G. Spaulding , D.J. Kennett, A. York, and P.L. Walker. 1999.

Environmental Imperatives Reconsidered: Demographic Crises in Western North America During the Medieval Climatic Anomaly. Current Anthropology 40:137-170.

Jones, T.L. and J.A. Ferneau 2002a. Prehistory at San Simeon Reef: Archaeological Data Recovery at CA-SLO-179 and -267, San Luis Obispo, California. San Luis Obispo Archaeological Society Occasional Paper No. 16.

Jones, T.L., and J.A. Ferneau. 2002b. Deintensification along the Central Coast. In Catalysts to Complexity: Late Holocene Societies of the California Coast, edited by J.M. Erlandson and T.L. Jones, pp. 205-232.

Perspectives in California Archaeology, Vol. 6. Cotsen Institute of Archaeology, University of California, Los Angeles.

Jones, T.L. and J. Haney. 2005. Archaeological Evaluation of CA-MNT-910, -1748/H, -1919, and -2182, Fort Hunter Liggett Military Installation, Monterey County, California. California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo.

Jones, D., and W.R. Hildebrandt. 1990. Archaeological Investigation at Sand Hill Bluff: Portions of Prehistoric Site CA-SCr-7, Santa Cruz County, California. Far Western Anthropological Research Group, Inc., Davis. Copies available from Northwest Information Center, Department of Anthropology, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park.

Jones, D., and W.R. Hildebrandt. 1994. Archaeological Investigations at Sites CA-SCR-10, CA-SCR-17, CA-SCR- 304, and CA-SCR-38/123 for the North Coast Treated Water Main Project, Santa Cruz County, California.

Far Western Anthropological Research Group, Inc. Copies available from Northwest Information Center, Department of Anthropology, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park.

Jones, T.L., and D. Jones. 1992. Elkhorn Slough Revisited: Reassessing the Chronology of CA-MNT-229. Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 14:159-179.

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 602

Mr. Stern
Subject: Archeological Assessment for the Sanchez-Mesa Apartments, Hollister, California 12801
18 August 2020
Jones, T.L., J.F. Porcasi, J.W. Gaeta, and B.F. Codding. 2008. The Diablo Canyon Fauna: A Coarse-grained Record of Trans-Holocene Foraging from the Central California Mainland Coast. American Antiquity 73:289–316.

Jones, T. L., N. E. Stevens, D. A. Jones, R. T. Fitzgerald, and M. G. Hylkema. 2007. The Central Coast: A Midlatitude Milieu. In California Prehistory Colonization, Culture, and Complexity, edited by Terry L. Jones and Kathryn A. Klar, pp: 125-146. Altamira Press, Lanham.

Jones, T.L. and G. Waugh 1995. Central California Coastal Prehistory: A View from Little Pico Creek. Perspectives in California Archaeology No. 3, Institute of Archaeology, University of California, Los Angeles.

Jones, T.L. and G. Waugh 1997. Climatic Consequences or Population Pragmatism? A Middle Holocene Prehistory of the Central California Coast. In Archaeology of the California Coast during the Middle Holocene, edited by J.M. Erlandson and M.A. Glassow, pp. 111-128. Perspectives in California Archaeology 4. Institute of Archaeology, University of California, Los Angeles.

King, T. 1973. Archaeological Impact Evaluation: San Felipe Division, Central Valley Project, Part II: The Direct Impact of San Felipe Division Facilities on Archaeological Resources. On file (S-5222a), Northwest Information Center, Sonoma State University.

King, T. F. and P. P. Hickman. 1973. Archaeological Impact Evaluation: San Felipe Division, Central Valley Project, Part I; The Southern Santa Clara Valley, California: A General Plan for Archaeology. On file (S-5222), Northwest Information Center, Sonoma State University.

Küchler, A. W. 1977. Natural Vegetation of California Map. University of Geography, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas.

Levy, R. 1978. Costanoan. Handbook of North American Indians. Vol. 8. Edited by Robert F. Heizer. Smithsonian Institution, Washington.

McMahon, J. M. and P. Sonne. 2012. Hollister. Arcadia Publishing, Charleston, SC.

Mikkelsen, P. 2010. First Supplemental Archaeological Survey Report for the Highway 1 High Occupancy Vehicle Lane Widening Project, Santa Cruz, California, 05-SCR-1 PM R7.24/16.13 (KP R11.67/25.96), EA 05- 0C7300. On file (S-47397a), Northwest Information Center, Sonoma State University.

Mikkelsen, P., Julia Costello, Jerome King, Charlene Deval, Edna Kimbro, and John Berg. 2005. Archaeological Survey Report for the Highway 1 High Occupancy Vehicle Lane Widening Project, Santa Cruz, California, SCR-1 PM R7.6/16.8 (KP R12.22/27.02), EA 05-0C7300. On file (S-47397), Northwest Information Center, Sonoma State University.

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 603

Mr. Stern
Subject: Archeological Assessment for the Sanchez-Mesa Apartments, Hollister, California 12801
19 August 2020
Mikkelsen, P., W.R. Hildebrandt and D.A. Jones 2000. Prehistoric Adaptations on the Shores of Morro Bay Estuary:

Excavations at Site CA-SLO-165, Morro Bay, California. Occasional Paper No. 14, San Luis Obispo County Archaeological Society, San Luis Obispo, California.

Milliken, R. T. 1995. A Time of Little Choice: The Disintegration of Tribal Culture in the San Francisco Bay Area 1769-1810. Ballena Press, Menlo Park, CA.

Milliken, R., J. Nelson, W.R. Hildebrandt, and P. Mikkelsen. 1999. The Moss Landing Hill Site: A Technical Report on Archaeological Studies at CA-MNT-234 in 1991 and 1997-1998. Far Western Anthropological Research Group, Inc., Davis. Copies available from the Northwest Information Center, Department of Anthropology, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park.

Mills, W.W., M.F. Rondeau, and T.L. Jones. 2005.A Fluted Point from Nipomo, San Luis Obispo County, California.

Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 25:214-220.

Newsome, S.D., D.L. Phillips, B.J. Culleton, T.P. Guilderson, P. Koch. 2004. Dietary Reconstruction of an Early to Middle Holocene Human Population from the Central California Coast: Insights from Advanced Stable Isotope Mixing Models. Journal of Archaeological Science 31:1101-1115.

National Park Service. 2020. Secretary of the Interior’s Guidelines for Identification. Electronic document, https://www.nps.gov/history/local-law/arch_stnds_2.htm#tech , accessed August 16, 2020.

Peak, M. A. 2012. Determination of Eligibility and Effect for the Gardens at San Juan Project, City of Hollister, California. On file (S-45151), Northwest Information Center, Sonoma State University.

Pohorecky, Z.S. 1976. Archaeology of the South Coast Ranges of California. University of Archaeological Research Facility 34, Berkeley.

Roop, W., L. Barker, and C. Detlefs. 1977. Cultural Resource Inventory of the Scotts Valley Wastewater Service Area. Prepared for Harris & Associates and the City of Scotts Valley. On file, (S-3913), Northwest Information Center, Sonoma State University.

Rogers, D.B. 1929. Prehistoric Man of the Santa Barbara Coast. Museum of Natural History, Santa Barbara.

Rosenthal, J.S. and J. Meyer 2004. Landscape Evolution and the Archaeological Record: A Geoarchaeological Study of the Southern Santa Clara Valley and Surrounding Region. Center for Archaeological Research at Davis Publication no. 14. University of California, Davis.

San Benito County. 2020. Assessor’s Records for APN 052-090-008. On file (confidential), San Benito County Assessor’s Office.

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 604

Mr. Stern
Subject: Archeological Assessment for the Sanchez-Mesa Apartments, Hollister, California 12801
20 August 2020
SoilWeb. 2020. Website accessed 08/26/2020:
https://casoilresource.lawr.ucdavis.edu/soil_web/ssurgo.php?action=explain_component&mukey=4559 46&cokey=16658758
Stine, S. 1994. Extreme and Persistent Drought in California and Patagonia during Medieval Time. Nature 369:546 - 549.

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 605

25 25
156
Project Location
Sanchez-Mesa Apartments, Hollister, California
SOURCE: USGS 7.5-Minute Series Hollister Quadrangle
Da
t
e
:

7 /
6 /
2 0
2 0

L
a
s
t

s
a
v
e
d

b
y
:

t
f
r
i
e
s
e
n

P
a
t
h
:

Z
:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
j
1 2
8 0
1 0
1 \
M
A
P
D
O
C
\
D
O
C
U
M
E
N
T
\
C
u
l
t
u
r
a
l
\
F
i
g
u
r
e
1 _
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
.
m
x
d
02,0001,000 Feet
Project Boundary
FIGURE 1
King City
Greenfield
Soledad
Gonzales
Salinas
Hollister
Dos Palos
San Juan
Bautista
Merced
County
Fresno
County
Santa Clara
County
San Benito
County
Monterey
County
101
165
183
68 146
3325
152
198
156
25 5Project Site
E.3.d
Packet Pg. 606

Project Boundary and Survey Results
Sanchez-Mesa Apartments, Hollister, California
SOURCE: ESRI (Accessed 2020)
Da
t
e
:

8 /
2 8
/
2 0
2 0

L
a
s
t

s
a
v
e
d

b
y
:

b
d
o
k
k
e
s
t
u
l

P
a
t
h
:

Z
:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
j
1 2
8 0
1 0
1 \
M
A
P
D
O
C
\
D
O
C
U
M
E
N
T
\
C
u
l
t
u
r
a
l
\
F
i
g
u
r
e
2 _
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
S
i
t
e
_
S
u
r
v
e
y
R
e
s
u
l
t
s
.
m
x
d
0 10050Feet
Project Area & Survey Coverage Boundary
FIGURE 2
Resource P-35-00564
Concrete Pad & Asphalt
Imported Gravel and Rock
Down
Upper Parcel Area
Lower Parcel Area
E.3.d
Packet Pg. 607

Attachment 1
National Archaeological Database Information

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 608

NATIONAL ARCHAEOLOGI CAL DATABASE
(NADB) INFORMATION
Authors: John P. Schlagheck, MA, RPA
Firm: Dudek
Project Proponent: City of Hollister, California
Report Date: August 2020
Report Title: Cultural Resources Assessment for Sanchez-Mesa Apartments, City of Hollister, San Benito County, California (letter report) Type of Study: Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment
Resources: P-35-000564
USGS Quads: 7.5-minute Hollister Quad
Acreage: 5.5 acres
Permit Numbers: None
Keywords: Archaeological survey, Hollister, CA

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 609

Attachment 2
NWIC Records Search

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 610

California Historical Resources Information System
CHRIS Data Request Form
1 of 3
2-29-2020 Version
ACCESS AND USE AGREEMENT NO.:_______________ IC FILE NO.:________________________ To: ___________________________________________________________________ Information Center Print Name: ____________________________________________________ Date: _____________________ Affiliation: ________________________________________________________________________________ Address: _________________________________________________________________________________ City: _________________________________________ State: ________________ Zip: __________________ Phone: __________________ Fax: __________________ Email: ____________________________________ Billing Address (if different than above): _________________________________________________________ Billing Email: _______________________________________________ Billing Phone: ___________________ Project Name / Reference: ___________________________________________________________________ Project Street Address: ______________________________________________________________________ County or Counties: ________________________________________________________________________ Township/Range/UTMs: _____________________________________________________________________ USGS 7.5’ Quad(s): ________________________________________________________________________ PRIORITY RESPONSE (Additional Fee): yes / no
TOTAL FEE NOT TO EXCEED: $___________________________
(If blank, the Information Center will contact you if the fee is expected to exceed $1,000.00) Special Instructions:

Information Center Use Only
Date of CHRIS Data Provided for this Request: ___________________________________________________ Confidential Data Included in Response: yes / no
Notes: ___________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________ E.3.d
Packet Pg. 611

2 of 3
2-29-2020 Version
California Historical Resources Information System
CHRIS Data Request Form
Mark the request form as needed. Attach a PDF of your project area (with the radius if applicable) mapped on a

7.5’ USGS topographic quadrangle to scale 1:24000 ratio 1:1 neither enlarged nor reduced and include a shapefile of your project area, if available. Shapefiles are the current CHRIS standard for submitting digital spatial data for your project area or radius. Check with the appropriate IC for current availability of digital data products.
•Documents will be provided in PDF format. Paper copies will only be provided if PDFs are not available at the time of the request or under specially arranged circumstances. •Location information will be provided as a digital map product (Custom Maps or GIS data) unless the area has not yet been digitized. In such circumstances, the IC may provide hand drawn maps. •In addition to the $150/hr. staff time fee, client will be charged the Custom Map fee when GIS is required to complete the request [e.g., a map printout or map image/PDF is requested and no GIS Data is requested, or an electronic product is requested (derived from GIS data) but no mapping is requested].

For product fees, see the CHRIS IC Fee Structure on the OHP website.

1. Map Format Choice:

Select One: Custom GIS Maps GIS Data  Custom GIS Maps and GIS Data  No Maps  Any selection below left unmarked will be considered a "no. " Within project area Within ______ radius
yes / no yes / no
yes / no yes / no
yes / no yes / no
yes / no yes / no
Within ______radius

2.Location Information:

ARCHAEOLOGICAL Resource Locations1
NON-ARCHAEOLOGICAL Resource Locations
Report Locations1
“Other” Report Locations2

3.Database Information:
(contact the IC for product examples, or visit the SSJVIC website for examples) Within project areaARCHAEOLOGICAL Resource Database1
yes / no yes / no
yes / no yes / no
List (PDF format)
Detail (PDF format)
Excel Spreadsheet yes / no yes / no
NON-ARCHAEOLOGICAL Resource Database
yes / no yes / no
yes / no yes / no
List (PDF format)
Detail (PDF format)
Excel Spreadsheet yes / no yes / no
Report Database1
yes / no yes / no
yes / no yes / no
yes / no yes / no
List (PDF format)
Detail (PDF format)
Excel Spreadsheet
Include “Other” Reports 2 yes / no yes / no

4.Document PDFs (paper copy only upon request):

Within project area Within ______ radius
ARCHAEOLOGICAL Resource Records1 yes / no yes / no NON-ARCHAEOLOGICAL Resource Records yes / no yes / no Reports1 yes / no yes / no
“Other” Reports2 yes / no yes / no
E.3.d
Packet Pg. 612

California Historical Resources Information System
CHRIS Data Request Form

5.Eligibility Listings and Documentation:

Within project area Within ______ radius
yes / no yes / no
yes / no yes / no
yes / no yes / no
yes / no yes / no
yes / no yes / no
OHP Built Environment Resources Directory3:

Directory listing only (Excel format)
Associated documentation4
OHP Archaeological Resources Directory1,5:

Directory listing only (Excel format)
Associated documentation4
California Inventory of Historic Resources (1976):

Directory listing only (PDF format)
Associated documentation4 yes / no yes / no

6.Additional Information:

The following sources of information may be available through the Information Center. However, several of these sources are now available on the OHP website and can be accessed directly. The Office of Historic Preservation makes no guarantees about the availability, completeness, or accuracy of the information provided through these sources. Indicate below if the Information Center should review and provide documentation (if available) of any of the following sources as part of this request.

Caltrans Bridge Survey yes / no
Ethnographic Information yes / no
Historical Literature yes / no
Historical Maps yes / no
Local Inventories yes / no
GLO and/or Rancho Plat Maps yes / no
Shipwreck Inventory yes / no
Soil Survey Maps yes / no
1 In order to receive archaeological information, requestor must meet qualifications as specified in Section III of the current version of the California Historical Resources Information System Information Center Rules of Operation Manual and be identified as an Authorized User or Conditional User under an active CHRIS Access and Use Agreement. 2 “Other” Reports GIS layer consists of report study areas for which the report content is almost entirely non-fieldwork related (e.g., local/regional history, or overview) and/or for which the presentation of the study area boundary may or may not add value to a record search.
3 Provided as Excel spreadsheets with no cost for the rows; the only cost for this component is IC staff time. Includes, but not limited to, information regarding National Register of Historic Places, California Register of Historical Resources, California State Historical Landmarks, California State Points of Historical Interest, and historic building surveys. Previously known as the HRI and then as the HPD, it is now known as the Built Environment Resources Directory (BERD). The Office of Historic Preservation compiles this documentation and it is the source of the official status codes for evaluated resources. 4 Associated documentation will vary by resource. Contact the IC for further details. 5 Provided as Excel spreadsheets with no cost for the rows; the only cost for this component is IC staff time. Previously known as the Archaeological Determinations of Eligibility, now it is known as the Archaeological Resources Directory (ARD).

The Office of Historic Preservation compiles this documentation and it is the source of the official status codes for evaluated resources.
3 of 3
2-29-2020 Version
E.3.d
Packet Pg. 613

Records Search
Sanchez-Mesa Apartments, Hollister, California
SOURCE: USGS 7.5-Minute Series Hollister Quadrangle
Township 12S; Range 5E; Sections 28, 33
Da
t
e
:

7 /
6 /
2 0
2 0

L
a
s
t

s
a
v
e
d

b
y
:

t
f
r
i
e
s
e
n

P
a
t
h
:

Z
:
\
T
e
m
p
l
a
t
e
s
\
M
a
p
s
\
S
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
\
A
r
c
h
a
e
o
l
o
g
y
\
A
r
c
h
e
o

R
e
c
o
r
d

S
e
a
r
c
h

A
N
S
I

P
o
r
t
r
a
i
t
.
m
x
d
0 2,0001,000 Feetn
Study Area
1/4 Mile Buffer
1:24,000
0 570285Meters
E.3.d
Packet Pg. 614

8/13/2020 NWIC File No.: 20-0028

Sarah Brewer
Dudek
725 Front Street, Suite 400
Santa Cruz, CA 95060

Re: 12801: Sanchez-Mesa Apartments

The Northwest Information Center received your record search request for the project area referenced above, located on the Hollister USGS 7.5’ quad(s). The following reflects the results of the records search for the project area and a ¼ mi. radius:

Resources within project area: P-35-000564

Resources within ¼ mi. radius: P-35-000534

Reports within project area:

S-5222, 42057, 44151
Reports within ¼ mi. radius: S-3274, 12886, 13334, 38061, 46392

Resource Database Printout (list): ☐ enclosed ☒ not requested ☐ nothing listed Resource Database Printout (details): ☐ enclosed ☒ not requested ☐ nothing listed Resource Digital Database Records: ☒ enclosed ☐ not requested ☐ nothing listed Report Database Printout (list): ☐ enclosed ☒ not requested ☐ nothing listed Report Database Printout (details): ☐ enclosed ☒ not requested ☐ nothing listed Report Digital Database Records: ☒ enclosed ☐ not requested ☐ nothing listed Resource Record Copies: ☒ enclosed ☐ not requested ☐ nothing listed Report Copies: ☒ enclosed ☐ not requested ☐ nothing listed OHP Built Environment Resources Directory: ☐ enclosed ☒ not requested ☐ nothing listed Archaeological Determinations of Eligibility: ☐ enclosed ☐ not requested ☒ nothing listed CA Inventory of Historic Resources (1976): ☒ enclosed ☐ not requested ☐ nothing listed Ethnographic Information: ☒ enclosed ☐ not requested ☐ nothing listed Historical Maps: ☐ enclosed ☐ not requested ☒ nothing listed GLO and/or Rancho Plat Maps: ☐ enclosed ☐ not requested ☒ nothing listed E.3.d
Packet Pg. 615

Please forward a copy of any resulting reports from this project to the office as soon as possible. Due to the sensitive nature of archaeological site location data, we ask that you do not include resource location maps and resource location descriptions in your report if the report is for public distribution. If you have any questions regarding the results presented herein, please contact the office at the phone number listed above.

The provision of CHRIS Data via this records search response does not in any way constitute public disclosure of records otherwise exempt from disclosure under the California Public Records Act or any other law, including, but not limited to, records related to archeological site information maintained by or on behalf of, or in the possession of, the State of California, Department of Parks and Recreation, State Historic Preservation Officer, Office of Historic Preservation, or the State Historical Resources Commission.

Due to processing delays and other factors, not all of the historical resource reports and resource records that have been submitted to the Office of Historic Preservation are available via this records search. Additional information may be available through the federal, state, and local agencies that produced or paid for historical resource management work in the search area. Additionally, Native American tribes have historical resource information not in the CHRIS Inventory, and you should contact the California Native American Heritage Commission for information on local/regional tribal contacts.

Should you require any additional information for the above referenced project, reference the record search number listed above when making inquiries. Requests made after initial invoicing will result in the preparation of a separate invoice.

Thank you for using the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS).

Sincerely,
Annette Neal
Researcher
*Notes:
** Current versions of these resources are available on-line:

Caltrans Bridge Survey: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/structur/strmaint/historic.htm Soil Survey: http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/surveylist/soils/survey/state/?stateld=CA Shipwreck Inventory: http://www.slc.ca.gov/Info/Shipwrecks.html

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 616

1 12801
August 2020

Cultural Resource Reports within the Study Area
Report
No. Authors Year Title Publisher
Within Project Area
S-005222 Thomas F. King and
Patricia P. Hickman
1973 Archaeological Impact Evaluation: San Felipe
Division, Central Valley Project, Part I; The
Southern Santa Clara Valley, California: A General Plan for Archaeology California State
University, San
Francisco
S-005222a Thomas F. King 1973 Archaeological Impact Evaluation: San Felipe Division, Central Valley Project, Part II: The Direct
Impact of San Felipe Division Facilities on
Archaeological Resources
California State
University, San
Francisco
S-005222b Gary S. Breschini and Trudy Haversat 1978 A Preliminary Archaeological Surface Reconnaissance of the San Felipe Division, Central Valley Project, Santa Clara and San Benito
Counties, California
Archaeological Consulting
S-005222c David M. Van Horn 1980 Archaeological and Historical Investigations in Portions of the Central Valley Project, San Felipe Division ESCA - Tech Corp
S-042057 Scott M. Hudlow 2013 A Phase I Cultural Resource Survey for Hollister Family Apartments, City of Hollister, California Hudlow Cultural Resource Associates S-044151 Melinda A. Peak 2012 Determination of Eligibility and Effect for the Gardens at San Juan Project, City of Hollister, California Peak & Associates, Inc.

Within 0.25-mile Study buffer
S-003274 Laurence W. Spanne 1979 Supplement to Archaeological Survey Report, 05- SBt-156, P.M. 2.2/9.1, San Benito County, 05201-248801 by James McManus Caltrans
S-012886 William Shapiro 1991 Cultural Resources Investigation for the Proposed Gas Line 103 Replacement Project, City of Hollister, San Benito County, California
PAR Environmental Services, Inc.

S-013334 1991 Cultural Resource Evaluation of a Parcel Located off Buena Vista Road in the City of Hollister, County of San Benito
Archaeological Resource Management
S-038061 Melinda A. Peak 2010 Determination of Eligibility and Effect for the Hollister Family Apartments Project, City of Hollister, California Peak & Associates, Inc.

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 617

Records Search 20-0028, Studies
610 0 610305 Feet
±
Previously Conducted Studies
Project Boundary

0.25-mile Buffer
Report polys
12801Studies Map
E.3.d
Packet Pg. 618

1 12801
August 2020

Resources within the Study Area
Primary Trinomial Resource Name Resource Type Age Attributes Recording Events Resources within the Project Area
P-35-000564 N/A CBH-2 Building Historic Ancillary building 2013 (Scott Hudlow, Hudlow Cultural Resource Associates)
Resources within the 0.25-mile buffer
P-35-000534 N/A PA-09-22 Building Historic Single-family property, ancillary
building
2009 (Michael Lawson, Peak &
Associates)

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 619

Records Search 20-0028, Resources
610 0 610305 Feet
±
Resources
Project Boundary

0.25-mile Buffer
resource points
resource polys
12801
Resources Map
E.3.d
Packet Pg. 620

P-35-000564
E.3.d
Packet Pg. 621

P-35-000564
E.3.d
Packet Pg. 622

P-35-000564
E.3.d
Packet Pg. 623

P-35-000564
E.3.d
Packet Pg. 624

P-35-000564
E.3.d
Packet Pg. 625

P-35-000564
E.3.d
Packet Pg. 626

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 627

Attachment 3
Native American Outreach

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 628

Sacred Lands File & Native American Contacts List Request Native American Heritage Commission
1550 Harbor Blvd, Suite 100
West Sacramento, CA 95691
916-373-3710
916-373-5471 – Fax
[email protected]
Information Below is Required for a Sacred Lands File Search Project:

County:______________________________________________________________________ USGS Quadrangle Name:_______________________________________________________ Township:_________ Range:__________ Section(s):_______________________________ Company/Firm/Agency:_________________________________________________________ Street Address:________________________________________________________________ City:______________________________________________ Zip:______________________ Phone:_____________________________________________
Fax:_______________________________________________
Email:_____________________________________________
Project Description:

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 629

Records Search
Sanchez-Mesa Apartments, Hollister, California
SOURCE: USGS 7.5-Minute Series Hollister Quadrangle
Township 12S; Range 5E; Sections 28, 33
Da
t
e
:

7 /
6 /
2 0
2 0

L
a
s
t

s
a
v
e
d

b
y
:

t
f
r
i
e
s
e
n

P
a
t
h
:

Z
:
\
T
e
m
p
l
a
t
e
s
\
M
a
p
s
\
S
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
\
A
r
c
h
a
e
o
l
o
g
y
\
A
r
c
h
e
o

R
e
c
o
r
d

S
e
a
r
c
h

A
N
S
I

P
o
r
t
r
a
i
t
.
m
x
d
0 2,0001,000 Feetn
Study Area
1/4 Mile Buffer
1:24,000
0 570285Meters
E.3.d
Packet Pg. 630

STATE OF CALIFORNIA Gavin Newsom, Governor

NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION

Page 1 of 1 ends

July 8, 2020

Sarah Brewer, Archaeologist
Dudek

Via Email to: [email protected]
Cc to: [email protected]

Re: Dudek Project 12801: Sanchez-Mesa Apartments, Hollister Project, San Benito County

Dear Ms. Brewer:

A record search of the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) Sacred Lands File (SLF) was completed for the information you have submitted for the above referenced project. The results were positive. Please contact the Amah Mutsun Tribal Band on the attached list for more information. Other sources of cultural resources should also be contacted for information regarding known and recorded sites.

Attached is a list of Native American tribes who may also have knowledge of cultural resources in the project area. This list should provide a starting place in locating areas of potential adverse impact within the proposed project area. I suggest you contact all of those indicated; if they cannot supply information, they might recommend others with specific knowledge. By contacting all those listed, your organization will be better able to respond to claims of failure to consult with the appropriate tribe. If a response has not been received within two weeks of notification, the Commission requests that you follow-up with a telephone call or email to ensure that the project information has been received.

If you receive notification of change of addresses and phone numbers from tribes, please notify me. With your assistance, we can assure that our lists contain current information.

If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at my email address: [email protected].

Sincerely,

Sarah Fonseca
Cultural Resources Analyst

Attachment

CHAIRPERSON
Laura Miranda
Luiseño

VICE CHAIRPERSON
Reginald Pagaling
Chumash

SECRETARY
Merri Lopez-Keifer
Luiseño

PARLIAMENTARIAN
Russell Attebery
Karuk

COMMISSIONER
Marshall McKay
Wintun

COMMISSIONER
William Mungary
Paiute/White Mountain
Apache

COMMISSIONER
Julie Tumamait-
Stenslie
Chumash

COMMISSIONER
[Vacant]

EXECUTIVE SECRETARY
Christina Snider
Pomo

NAHC HEADQUARTERS
1550 Harbor Boulevard
Suite 100
West Sacramento,
California 95691
(916) 373-3710
[email protected]
NAHC.ca.gov

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 631

Amah MutsunTribal Band
Valentin Lopez, Chairperson
P.O. Box 5272
Galt, CA, 95632
Phone: (916) 743 - 5833
[email protected]
Costanoan
Northern Valley
Yokut
Amah MutsunTribal Band of
Mission San Juan Bautista
Irenne Zwierlein, Chairperson
789 Canada Road
Woodside, CA, 94062
Phone: (650) 851 - 7489
Fax: (650) 332-1526
[email protected]
Costanoan
Indian Canyon Mutsun Band of
Costanoan
Ann Marie Sayers, Chairperson
P.O. Box 28
Hollister, CA, 95024
Phone: (831) 637 - 4238
[email protected]
Costanoan
1 of 1
This list is current only as of the date of this document. Distribution of this list does not relieve any person of statutory responsibility as defined in Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code, Section 5097.94 of the Public Resource Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code.

This list is only applicable for contacting local Native Americans with regard to cultural resources assessment for the proposed Dudek Project 12801: Sanchez- Mesa Apartments, Hollister Project, San Benito County.

PROJ-2020-
003849
07/08/2020 12:45 PM
Native American Heritage Commission
Native American Contact List
San Benito County
7/8/2020
E.3.d
Packet Pg. 632

July 9, 2020 PN: 12801

Sarah Brewer, BA
Cultural Resources
DUDEK
725 Front Street, Suite 400 Santa Cruz, California 95060 T: 831.226.9472 [email protected] Attachment: Figure 1. Records Search Map

Chairperson Ann Marie Sayers [typical letter to Native American representatives] P.O. Box 28
Hollister, CA 95024
Subject: Sanchez-Mesa Apartment Project, Hollister, San Benito County-Native American Outreach Dear Chairperson Sayers,
Dudek is conducting a cultural resources study for a construction project (Project) located at 1550 San Juan Road (APN 052-090-008), Hollister, San Benito County, California (Figure 1). The project includes construction of a mixed-use development with 157 apartment units and 6,812 square feet of commercial space with associated on-site parking and site improvements on the 241,244-square foot lot.

As part of our efforts to identify cultural resources that may be affected by the project, Dudek is reaching out to Native American tribes with local knowledge of the Project vicinity. Dudek requested a Sacred Lands File (SLF) search from the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). The NAHC found positive results for the SLF search and directed us to the Amah Mutsun Tribal Band for more information.

The NAHC provided us your contact as someone who may have additional information regarding cultural resources or sacred sites in the vicinity. Any information you provide will remain confidential and be used for planning purposes for this project only.

Please review the records search maps attached to this letter and respond within 14 days if you have any questions or comments. You may respond by mail, e-mail or telephone. If you have any questions or comments, you can reach me by telephone at (831) 226-9472, or by e-mail at [email protected]. All comments and letters received will be included in our confidential report. Thank you very much for your time regarding our request.

Sincerely,
E.3.d
Packet Pg. 633

Records Search
Sanchez-Mesa Apartments, Hollister, California
SOURCE: USGS 7.5-Minute Series Hollister Quadrangle
Township 12S; Range 5E; Sections 28, 33
Da
t
e
:

7 /
6 /
2 0
2 0

L
a
s
t

s
a
v
e
d

b
y
:

t
f
r
i
e
s
e
n

P
a
t
h
:

Z
:
\
T
e
m
p
l
a
t
e
s
\
M
a
p
s
\
S
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
\
A
r
c
h
a
e
o
l
o
g
y
\
A
r
c
h
e
o

R
e
c
o
r
d

S
e
a
r
c
h

A
N
S
I

P
o
r
t
r
a
i
t
.
m
x
d
0 2,0001,000 Feetn
Study Area
1/4 Mile Buffer
1:24,000
0 570285Meters
E.3.d
Packet Pg. 634

1 Sarah Brewer
From:Val Lopez
Sent:Thursday, August 6, 2020 9:05 AM
To:Sarah Brewer
Cc:John Schlagheck; Rob Cuthrell; Aerieways
Subject:Re: Tribal outreach for Sanchez-Mesa Apartments, Hollister, San Benito County Dear Ms. Brewer,

The Amah Mutsun Tribal Band request a Native American monitor from our Amah Mutsun Tribal Band be used on this project. With the positive finding for cultural resource material a monitor must be on site for all ground disturbance work.

Rob Cuthrell, Ph.D., who's cc'd on this email will be the contact person for arranging the monitor.

Thank you,

Valentin Lopez, Chair
Amah Mutsun Tribal Band
916-743-5833

On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 12:54 PM Sarah Brewer wrote:

Dear Chairperson Lopez,

Dudek is conducting a cultural resources study for a construction project (Project) located at 1550 San Juan Road (APN 052-090-008), Hollister, San Benito County, California (see attached). The project includes construction of a mixed-use development with 157 apartment units and 6,812 square feet of commercial space with associated on-site parking and site improvements on the 241,244-square foot lot.

The NAHC provided us your contact as someone who may have additional information regarding cultural resources E.3.d
Packet Pg. 635

Dudek 1 12231
January 2020
Native American Contact (as of August 17, 2020)
Date Contact Type From To Communications
7/6/2020 Email Dudek Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC)
Request Sacred Lands file (SLF) search and list of Native American contacts in the Project Area
7/8/2020 Email
Native American
Heritage Commission
(NAHC)
Dudek
Sacred Lands File indicated positive results and
recommended contacting the Amah Mutsun Tribal Band.

Included list of Native American contacts for the Project Area.
7/9/2020 Email Dudek Valentin Lopez, Chair of the Amah Mutsun Tribal Band Introduction to the project and request for information on additional resources in the Project Area
7/9/2020 Email Dudek Ann Marie Sayers, Chair of Indian Canyon Mutsun Band of Costanoan
Introduction to the project and request for information on additional resources in the Project Area 7/9/2020 Email Dudek Irenne Zwierlein, Chair of Amah Mutsun Tribal Band of Mission San Juan Bautista Ohlone Costanoan
Introduction to the project and request for information on additional resources in the Project Area
7/10/2020 Email
Ann Marie Sayers,
Chair of Indian Canyon Mutsun Band of
Costanoan
Dudek Email sent 7/9/2020 returned as “undeliverable”
8/6/2020 Email and
follow-up telephone call
Valentin Lopez, Chair of
the Amah Mutsun Tribal
Band
Dudek
“The Amah Mutsun Tribal Band request a Native American monitor from our Amah Mutsun Tribal Band be used on this project. With the positive finding for cultural resource material a monitor must be on site for all ground disturbance work.”
8/10/2020 Email Dudek Ann Marie Sayers, Chair of Indian Canyon Mutsun Band of Costanoan Introduction to the project and request for information on additional resources in the Project Area (re-send)
8/14/2020 Phone Dudek Ann Marie Sayers, Chair of Indian Canyon Mutsun Band of Costanoan Follow-up telephone call. No answer and voicemail box
full.

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 636

Attachment 4
Interested Party Outreach

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 637

1 August 11, 2020

San Benito County Historical Society 12801
Research Department
498 Fifth Street
Hollister, CA 95023

Subject: Sanchez-Mesa Apartments, 1550 San Juan Road, Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) 052-090-008 Dear San Benito County Historical Society Researchers:

Dudek is conducting a cultural resources inventory and evaluation study for the Sanchez-Mesa Apartment project (Proposed Project) in Hollister, California. The Proposed Project includes the demolition of one structure and construction of a 157-unit apartment complex with related parking and landscaping improvements on an existing

5.5-acre parcel (Project Area). The Project Area is located on the south side of San Juan Road (1550 San Juan Road) approximately 800 west of Live Oak Drive in the southwest portion of the City of Hollister. The subject property is found on the USGS Hollister 7.5-minute topographic Quad (Figure 1) and on the attached aerial photo (Figure 2).

The subject parcel is currently designated as Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) 052-090-008.

As part of our study, we are consulting regional historical organizations such as yours to determine if there are any known historic or cultural resources that may be affected by the Proposed Project. Your efforts in this process will provide valuable information for the proper identification and treatment of such resources. If you have any information regarding known cultural resources in the Proposed Project area, please feel free to contact me via phone or email (listed below). All comments, emails, or letters received will be included in the reports generated by this study. Thank you for your time regarding our request.

Sincerely,
____________________________
John P. Schlagheck, MA, RPA
Project Manager

Direct: 831-212-3886
Email: [email protected]

Att: Figure 1: Project Location Map
Figure 2: Aerial Photo with Project Boundary

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 638

25 25
156
Project Location
Sanchez-Mesa Apartments, Hollister, California
SOURCE: USGS 7.5-Minute Series Hollister Quadrangle
Da
t
e
:

7 /
6 /
2 0
2 0

L
a
s
t

s
a
v
e
d

b
y
:

t
f
r
i
e
s
e
n

P
a
t
h
:

Dudek Cultural Resoruces Study
Sanchez-Mesa Apartments
1550 San Juan Road, Hollister, California

Figure 2: Aerial photo with project boundary
E.3.d
Packet Pg. 640

12801
August 2020
Attachment 5
Project Photos

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 641

12801
August 2020

Photo 1: Project Area looking south from north boundary

Photo 2: Interior of P-35-00564 facing northeast corner of structure E.3.d
Packet Pg. 642

12801
August 2020

Photo 3: Project Area looking north from southeast corner of property boundary

Photo 4: Project Area looking west from central portion of the property E.3.d
Packet Pg. 643

Appendix C
Energy Calculations
E.3.d
Packet Pg. 644

On‐Site Diesel1 MTCO2e Gallons of Fuel4 Construction Year County Fuel (2022) Percent
Demolition 17 1,675
Site Preparation/Grading 62 6,069
Building Construction 493 48,571
Paving 23 2,266
Architectural Coating 6 591
Total 601 59,172 23,255,605 0.2544%
Off‐Site Diesel1
Demolition 1 99
Site Preparation/Grading 28 2,719
Building Construction 157 15,468
Paving 0 0
Architectural Coating 0 0
Total 186 18,286 23,255,605 0.0786%
Off‐Site Gasoline2
Demolition 0 56
Site Preparation/Grading 3 295
Building Construction 218 24,688
Paving 1 114
Architectural Coating 4 454
Total 226 25,606 27,611,047 0.0927%
Total Diesel Fuel 77,458 23,255,605                       0.3331% Total Gasoline Fuel 25,606 27,611,047                       0.0927% Total Construction Fuel 1,012 103,064
On‐Site Diesel
(Off‐Road)
Off‐Site Diesel
(Hauling/Vendor)
Off‐Site Gas
(Worker)
On‐Site Diesel
(Off‐Road)
Off‐Site Diesel
(Hauling/Vendor)
Off‐Site Gas
(Worker)
On‐Site Diesel
(Off‐Road)
Off‐Site Diesel
(Hauling/Vendor)
Off‐Site Gas
(Worker)
On‐Site Diesel
(Off‐Road)
Off‐Site Diesel
(Hauling/Vendor)
Off‐Site Gas
(Worker)
On‐Site Diesel
(Off‐Road)
Off‐Site Diesel
(Hauling/Vendor)
Off‐Site Gas
(Worker)
On‐Site Diesel
(Off‐Road)
Off‐Site Diesel
(Hauling/Vendor)
Off‐Site Gas
(Worker)
2022 17 1 0 17 0 1 45 28 2 12 4 5 23 0 1
2023 303 97 135
2024 178 56 78 604
Total 17 1 0 17 0 1 45 28 2 493 157 218 23 01604
UPDATED  4/19/2022
Notes:
1  Fuel used for off‐road, hauling, and vendor trips assumed to be diesel. 2  Fuel used for worker trips assumed to be gasoline.
3  MTCO2e rates from CalEEMod (3.0 Construction Details). 4  For CO2e emissions, see Chapter 13 (page 94); Conversion Ratios: Climate Registry, General Reporting Protocol, 2016.

Architectural Coating
Construction Phase3
Demolition Site Preparation Grading Building Construction Paving E.3.d
Packet Pg. 645

2024
UPDATED  4/19/2022
Vehicle Type Percent1 Annual VMT2 MGP3 Annual Fuel Fuel Type Operational Year
County
Gallons4
County
Percent Statewide Statewide percent
Passenger Cars 0.7937 2,183,370 21.6 101,082 Gas 27,486,528                0.3678%15,589,042,965 0.0006% Light/Medium Trucks 0.04089 112,498 17.2 6,541 Diesel 23,071,011                0.0283%3,107,823,655 0.0002% Heavy Trucks/Other 0 455,088 6.1 74,605 Diesel 23,071,011                0.3234% Total 1.000                          2,750,959 81,145
Land Use1 LDA LDT1 LDT2 MCY MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS SBUS MH Apartments Mid Rise 0.487067 0.02401 0.172977 0.005596 0.104026 0.020215 0.004444 0.012289 0.165429 0.001449 0.001128 0.000598 0.00077 Regional Shopping Center 0.487067 0.02401 0.172977 0.005596 0.104026 0.020215 0.004444 0.012289 0.165429 0.001449 0.001128 0.000598 0.00077 Notes:
1  Percent of vehicle trip distribution based on fleet mix from CalEEMod (4.4 Fleet Mix). 2  Total annual operational VMT based on mitigated annual VMT from CalEEMod (4.2 Trip Summary Information). 3  Average fuel economy derived from Department of Transportation. 4  Total annual county fuel per EMFAC 2017 model of projected operational fuel usage.

0.3517%
E.3.d
Packet Pg. 646

UPDATED  4/19/2022
Mitigated Project
Annual Energy
County
Annual Energy3
Percentage
Increase 1 kBtu = 0.01 therms
Electricity (kWh/yr)687,871 390,671,108                        0.1761%1 therm = 100 kBtu Electricity (MWh/yr)688 390,671                               0.1761% Electricity (GWh/yr)0.687871 390.671108 0.1761%
Natural Gas (million therms)15.012815
Natural Gas (kBTU/yr)1,325,046 1,501,281,500                    0.0883% Natural Gas (therms)13,250.46                        15,012,815                          0.0883% Unmitigated Mitigated Unmitigated Mitigated
Apartments Mid Rise 607030 607030 1.32E+06 1.32E+06
Parking Lot 40320 40320 0 0
Shopping Center 40,521 40,521 9,126 9,126
Total Energy 687,871 687,871 1,325,046 1,325,046
Land Use Electricity1 (kWh/yr)Natural Gas2 (kBTU/yr)
Notes:
1  Electricity use per CalEEMod (5.3 Energy by Land Use). 2  Natural Gas use per CalEEMod (5.2 Natural Gas by Land Use). 3  County total energy values from California Energy Commission energy reports available through ecdms.energy.ca.gov.

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 647

Daily Soil Disturbance1 15 acres UPDATED 4/19/2022
Days of Soil Disturbance2 44 days
Water Concentration3 3,020 gallons/acre
Water Energy Intensity4 3,500 kWh/MG 0.000018
Total Construction Water 1.99 million gallons
Construction Water Energy 6,976 kWh

0.0070 GWh
Percentage Increase Countywide 0.001786%
Notes:
1 Total daily acres disturbed from offroad equipment per CalEEMod (3.0 Construction Detail) and maximum SCAQMD LST values for soil‐disturbing equipment. 2 Number of days of construction with soil‐disturbing equipment per CalEEMod (3.0 Construction Detail). 3 Water application rate per Air and Waste Management Association's Air Pollution Engineering Manual. 4 Water energy intensity factor for county subarea per CalEEMod User Guide, Appendix D, page D‐343.

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 648

Mitigated Indoor 10.5 million gallons UPDATED 4/19/2022 Indoor Energy Intensity Factor1 5,411 kWh/MG
Mitigated Outdoor 6.6 million gallons 379870420
Outdoor Energy Intensity Factor2 3,500 kWh/MG 0.0002104 Operational Water Energy 79915.50 kWh 0.0210376

79.92 MWh
Operational Water Energy 0.08 GWh
Total water use 17.10 million gallons
Indoor Outdoor Indoor Outdoor
Apartments Mid Rise 10.2 6.4 10.2 6.4
Shopping Center 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.2

10.5 6.6 10.5 6.6
Land Use3 Unmitigated (MG)Mitigated (MG)
Notes:
1 Indoor water energy intensity factor for county subarea per CalEEMod User Guide, Appendix D, page D‐343. Factor includes supply, treatment, distribution, and wastewater. 2 Outdoor water energy intensity factor for county subarea per CalEEMod User Guide, Appendix D, page D‐343. Factor includes supply, treatment, and distribution. 3 Operational water use values per CalEEMod (7.2 Water by Land Use).

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 649

Appendix D
Preliminary Geotechnical Report
E.3.d
Packet Pg. 650

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 651

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 652

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 653

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 654

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 655

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 656

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 657

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 658

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 659

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 660

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 661

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 662

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 663

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 664

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 665

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 666

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 667

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 668

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 669

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 670

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 671

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 672

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 673

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 674

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 675

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 676

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 677

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 678

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 679

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 680

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 681

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 682

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 683

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 684

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 685

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 686

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 687

Appendix E
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Data
E.3.d
Packet Pg. 688

1550 San Juan
San Benito County, Annual
Project Characteristics -
Land Use -
Construction Phase - Per Construction Questionnaire
Demolition -
Grading -
Vehicle Trips - Per trip gen table
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Per MBARD rul compliance Water Mitigation -
Waste Mitigation - Per AB 939

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
4 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.5 50

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Pacific Gas and Electric Company
2024Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
203.98 0.033CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.004N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:43 AMPage 1 of 37 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 689

2.0 Emissions Summary
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstDustMitigation CleanPavedRoadPercentReduction 0 6 tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadMoistureContent 0 12 tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 43.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 230.00 423.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 10.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 34.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 23.00
tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 7,270.00
tblVehicleTrips DV_TP 11.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips DV_TP 35.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips PB_TP 3.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips PB_TP 11.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 86.00 100.00
tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 54.00 100.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 4.91 4.29
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 46.12 52.01
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 4.09 4.29
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 21.10 52.01
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 5.44 4.29
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 37.75 52.01
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:43 AMPage 2 of 37 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 690

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2022 0.0935 0.9410 0.7648 1.7100e-
003

0.2425 0.0418 0.2843 0.1148 0.0386 0.1534 0.0000 152.6393 152.6393 0.0352 5.0900e- 003
155.0359
2023 0.2740 2.1454 2.6919 5.9200e-
003

0.1999 0.0934 0.2932 0.0539 0.0879 0.1417 0.0000 528.1931 528.1931 0.0763 0.0174 535.2892 2024 1.1901 1.2145 1.6090 3.5600e-
003

0.1233 0.0496 0.1729 0.0332 0.0468 0.0800 0.0000 318.0526 318.0526 0.0448 0.0101 322.1833 Maximum 1.1901 2.1454 2.6919 5.9200e-
003

0.2425 0.0934 0.2932 0.1148 0.0879 0.1534 0.0000 528.1931 528.1931 0.0763 0.0174 535.2892 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2022 0.0935 0.9410 0.7648 1.7100e-
003

0.1144 0.0418 0.1561 0.0520 0.0386 0.0906 0.0000 152.6391 152.6391 0.0352 5.0900e- 003
155.0358
2023 0.2740 2.1454 2.6919 5.9200e-
003

0.1898 0.0934 0.2832 0.0514 0.0879 0.1393 0.0000 528.1928 528.1928 0.0763 0.0174 535.2888 2024 1.1901 1.2145 1.6090 3.5600e-
003

0.1170 0.0496 0.1667 0.0317 0.0468 0.0784 0.0000 318.0524 318.0524 0.0448 0.0101 322.1831 Maximum 1.1901 2.1454 2.6919 5.9200e-
003

0.1898 0.0934 0.2832 0.0520 0.0879 0.1393 0.0000 528.1928 528.1928 0.0763 0.0174 535.2888 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:43 AMPage 3 of 37 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 691

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25.54 0.00 19.25 33.09 0.00 17.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 9-1-2022 11-30-2022 0.8598 0.8598
2 12-1-2022 2-28-2023 0.5623 0.5623
3 3-1-2023 5-31-2023 0.6110 0.6110
4 6-1-2023 8-31-2023 0.6088 0.6088
5 9-1-2023 11-30-2023 0.6065 0.6065
6 12-1-2023 2-29-2024 0.5844 0.5844
7 3-1-2024 5-31-2024 0.5741 0.5741
8 6-1-2024 8-31-2024 1.4248 1.4248
Highest 1.4248 1.4248
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:43 AMPage 4 of 37 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 692

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 0.7882 0.0187 1.6221 9.0000e-
005

8.9800e-
003

0.0000 2.6520 2.6520 2.5600e-
003

0.0000 2.7159
Energy 7.1400e-
003

0.0611 0.0262 3.9000e-
004

4.9400e-
003

0.0000 134.3541 134.3541 0.0117 2.5400e-
003
135.4036
Mobile 0.5254 1.1360 4.9717 0.0111 1.0299 0.0121 1.0420 0.2756 0.0115 0.2871 0.0000 1,044.547 5 1,044.547
5 0.0591 0.0668 1,065.934
3 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 15.4902 0.0000 15.4902 0.9155 0.0000 38.3764 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3.3369 7.4115 10.7484 0.3439 8.2400e- 003

21.8016
Total 1.3208 1.2158 6.6200 0.0116 1.0299 0.0261 1.0559 0.2756 0.0254 0.3010 18.8271 1,188.965 0 1,207.792
2 1.3327 0.0776 1,264.231
8 Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:43 AMPage 5 of 37 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 693

8.9800e-
003

0.0000 2.6520 2.6520 2.5600e-
003

0.0000 2.7159
Energy 7.1400e-
003

0.0611 0.0262 3.9000e-
004

4.9400e-
003

0.0000 134.3541 134.3541 0.0117 2.5400e-
003
135.4036
Mobile 0.5254 1.1360 4.9717 0.0111 1.0299 0.0121 1.0420 0.2756 0.0115 0.2871 0.0000 1,044.547 5 1,044.547
5 0.0591 0.0668 1,065.934
3 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 7.7451 0.0000 7.7451 0.4577 0.0000 19.1882 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.6695 6.2275 8.8970 0.2752 6.6000e- 003

17.7425
Total 1.3208 1.2158 6.6200 0.0116 1.0299 0.0261 1.0559 0.2756 0.0254 0.3010 10.4146 1,187.781 0 1,198.195
6 0.8063 0.0760 1,240.984
5 Mitigated Operational

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 44.68 0.10 0.79 39.50 2.11 1.84 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:43 AMPage 6 of 37 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 694

4 Paving Paving 11/16/2022 12/16/2022 5 23
5 Building Construction Building Construction 12/19/2022 7/31/2024 5 423 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 6/3/2024 7/31/2024 5 43 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Residential Indoor: 317,925; Residential Outdoor: 105,975; Non-Residential Indoor: 5,850; Non-Residential Outdoor: 1,950; Striped Parking Area: 6,912 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 15
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 34
Acres of Paving: 2.59
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:43 AMPage 7 of 37 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 695

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Replace Ground Cover
Water Exposed Area
Water Unpaved Roads
Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads
Clean Paved Roads
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 27.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 6 15.00 0.00 909.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 163.00 36.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 33.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:43 AMPage 8 of 37 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 696

3.2 Demolition - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 2.9400e-
003

0.0000 2.9400e-
003

4.4000e-
004

0.0000 4.4000e-
004

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.0132 0.1286 0.1030 1.9000e-
004

6.2100e-
003

5.7800e-
003

0.0000 16.9951 16.9951 4.7700e-
003

0.0000 17.1145
Total 0.0132 0.1286 0.1030 1.9000e-
004

2.9400e-
003

6.2100e-
003

9.1500e-
003

4.4000e-
004

5.7800e-
003

6.2200e-
003

0.0000 16.9951 16.9951 4.7700e-
003

0.0000 17.1145
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 5.0000e-
005

2.0900e-
003

4.2000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

2.3000e-
004

2.0000e-
005

2.5000e-
004

6.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

8.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.7845 0.7845 0.0000 1.2000e-
004

0.8213
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.4000e-
004

1.7000e-
004

1.9200e-
003

1.0000e-
005

6.0000e-
004

0.0000 6.0000e-
004

1.6000e-
004

0.0000 1.6000e-
004

0.0000 0.4860 0.4860 2.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.4909
Total 2.9000e-
004

2.2600e-
003

2.3400e-
003

2.0000e-
005

8.3000e-
004

2.0000e-
005

8.5000e-
004

2.2000e-
004

2.0000e-
005

2.4000e-
004

0.0000 1.2706 1.2706 2.0000e-
005

1.3000e-
004

1.3122
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:43 AMPage 9 of 37 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 697

0.0000 1.2600e-
003

1.9000e-
004

0.0000 1.9000e-
004

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.0132 0.1286 0.1030 1.9000e-
004

6.2100e-
003

5.7800e-
003

0.0000 16.9951 16.9951 4.7700e-
003

0.0000 17.1144
Total 0.0132 0.1286 0.1030 1.9000e-
004

1.2600e-
003

6.2100e-
003

7.4700e-
003

1.9000e-
004

5.7800e-
003

5.9700e-
003

0.0000 16.9951 16.9951 4.7700e-
003

0.0000 17.1144
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 5.0000e-
005

2.0900e-
003

4.2000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

2.2000e-
004

2.0000e-
005

2.4000e-
004

6.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

8.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.7845 0.7845 0.0000 1.2000e-
004

0.8213
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.4000e-
004

1.7000e-
004

1.9200e-
003

1.0000e-
005

5.7000e-
004

0.0000 5.7000e-
004

1.5000e-
004

0.0000 1.5000e-
004

0.0000 0.4860 0.4860 2.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.4909
Total 2.9000e-
004

2.2600e-
003

2.3400e-
003

2.0000e-
005

7.9000e-
004

2.0000e-
005

8.1000e-
004

2.1000e-
004

2.0000e-
005

2.3000e-
004

0.0000 1.2706 1.2706 2.0000e-
005

1.3000e-
004

1.3122
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:43 AMPage 10 of 37 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 698

3.3 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0983 0.0000 0.0983 0.0505 0.0000 0.0505 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0159 0.1654 0.0985 1.9000e-
004

8.0600e-
003

7.4200e-
003

0.0000 16.7197 16.7197 5.4100e-
003

0.0000 16.8549
Total 0.0159 0.1654 0.0985 1.9000e-
004

0.0983 8.0600e-
003

0.1064 0.0505 7.4200e-
003

0.0579 0.0000 16.7197 16.7197 5.4100e-
003

0.0000 16.8549
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.9000e-
004

2.1000e-
004

2.3100e-
003

1.0000e-
005

7.2000e-
004

0.0000 7.2000e-
004

1.9000e-
004

0.0000 1.9000e-
004

0.0000 0.5833 0.5833 2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.5891
Total 2.9000e-
004

2.1000e-
004

2.3100e-
003

1.0000e-
005

7.2000e-
004

0.0000 7.2000e-
004

1.9000e-
004

0.0000 1.9000e-
004

0.0000 0.5833 0.5833 2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.5891
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:43 AMPage 11 of 37 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 699

3.3 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0420 0.0000 0.0420 0.0216 0.0000 0.0216 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0159 0.1654 0.0985 1.9000e-
004

8.0600e-
003

7.4200e-
003

0.0000 16.7197 16.7197 5.4100e-
003

0.0000 16.8549
Total 0.0159 0.1654 0.0985 1.9000e-
004

0.0420 8.0600e-
003

0.0501 0.0216 7.4200e-
003

0.0290 0.0000 16.7197 16.7197 5.4100e-
003

0.0000 16.8549
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.9000e-
004

2.1000e-
004

2.3100e-
003

1.0000e-
005

6.8000e-
004

0.0000 6.8000e-
004

1.8000e-
004

0.0000 1.9000e-
004

0.0000 0.5833 0.5833 2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.5891
Total 2.9000e-
004

2.1000e-
004

2.3100e-
003

1.0000e-
005

6.8000e-
004

0.0000 6.8000e-
004

1.8000e-
004

0.0000 1.9000e-
004

0.0000 0.5833 0.5833 2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.5891
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:43 AMPage 12 of 37 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 700

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.1209 0.0000 0.1209 0.0583 0.0000 0.0583 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0331 0.3545 0.2596 5.0000e-
004

0.0160 0.0160 0.0147 0.0147 0.0000 44.2931 44.2931 0.0143 0.0000 44.6512 Total 0.0331 0.3545 0.2596 5.0000e-
004

0.1209 0.0160 0.1369 0.0583 0.0147 0.0730 0.0000 44.2931 44.2931 0.0143 0.0000 44.6512 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 1.7000e-
003

0.0703 0.0141 2.7000e-
004

7.7600e-
003

7.3000e-
004

8.4900e-
003

2.1400e-
003

6.9000e-
004

2.8300e-
003

0.0000 26.4119 26.4119 8.0000e-
005

4.1500e-
003

27.6512
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 8.1000e-
004

5.8000e-
004

6.5400e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.0300e-
003

1.0000e-
005

2.0400e-
003

5.4000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

5.5000e-
004

0.0000 1.6525 1.6525 6.0000e-
005

5.0000e-
005

1.6691
Total 2.5100e-
003

0.0709 0.0206 2.9000e-
004

9.7900e-
003

7.4000e-
004

0.0105 2.6800e-
003

7.0000e-
004

3.3800e-
003

0.0000 28.0644 28.0644 1.4000e-
004

4.2000e-
003

29.3203
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:43 AMPage 13 of 37 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 701

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0517 0.0000 0.0517 0.0249 0.0000 0.0249 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0331 0.3545 0.2596 5.0000e-
004

0.0160 0.0160 0.0147 0.0147 0.0000 44.2931 44.2931 0.0143 0.0000 44.6512 Total 0.0331 0.3545 0.2596 5.0000e-
004

0.0517 0.0160 0.0677 0.0249 0.0147 0.0396 0.0000 44.2931 44.2931 0.0143 0.0000 44.6512 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 1.7000e-
003

0.0703 0.0141 2.7000e-
004

7.4200e-
003

7.3000e-
004

8.1400e-
003

2.0500e-
003

6.9000e-
004

2.7400e-
003

0.0000 26.4119 26.4119 8.0000e-
005

4.1500e-
003

27.6512
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 8.1000e-
004

5.8000e-
004

6.5400e-
003

2.0000e-
005

1.9300e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.9400e-
003

5.1000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

5.2000e-
004

0.0000 1.6525 1.6525 6.0000e-
005

5.0000e-
005

1.6691
Total 2.5100e-
003

0.0709 0.0206 2.9000e-
004

9.3500e-
003

7.4000e-
004

0.0101 2.5600e-
003

7.0000e-
004

3.2600e-
003

0.0000 28.0644 28.0644 1.4000e-
004

4.2000e-
003

29.3203
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:43 AMPage 14 of 37 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 702

3.5 Paving - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0127 0.1279 0.1677 2.6000e-
004

6.5300e-
003

6.0100e-
003

0.0000 23.0317 23.0317 7.4500e-
003

0.0000 23.2179
Paving 3.3900e-
003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0161 0.1279 0.1677 2.6000e-
004

6.5300e-
003

6.0100e-
003

0.0000 23.0317 23.0317 7.4500e-
003

0.0000 23.2179
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 5.5000e-
004

3.9000e-
004

4.4200e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.3700e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.3800e-
003

3.7000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.7000e-
004

0.0000 1.1179 1.1179 4.0000e-
005

3.0000e-
005

1.1291
Total 5.5000e-
004

3.9000e-
004

4.4200e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.3700e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.3800e-
003

3.7000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.7000e-
004

0.0000 1.1179 1.1179 4.0000e-
005

3.0000e-
005

1.1291
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:43 AMPage 15 of 37 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 703

6.5300e-
003

6.0100e-
003

0.0000 23.0317 23.0317 7.4500e-
003

0.0000 23.2179
Paving 3.3900e-
003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0161 0.1279 0.1677 2.6000e-
004

6.5300e-
003

6.0100e-
003

0.0000 23.0317 23.0317 7.4500e-
003

0.0000 23.2179
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 5.5000e-
004

3.9000e-
004

4.4200e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.3000e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.3100e-
003

3.5000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.6000e-
004

0.0000 1.1179 1.1179 4.0000e-
005

3.0000e-
005

1.1291
Total 5.5000e-
004

3.9000e-
004

4.4200e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.3000e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.3100e-
003

3.5000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.6000e-
004

0.0000 1.1179 1.1179 4.0000e-
005

3.0000e-
005

1.1291
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:43 AMPage 16 of 37 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 704

3.6 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 8.5300e-
003

0.0781 0.0818 1.3000e-
004

4.0500e-
003

3.8100e-
003

0.0000 11.5863 11.5863 2.7800e-
003

0.0000 11.6557
Total 8.5300e-
003

0.0781 0.0818 1.3000e-
004

4.0500e-
003

3.8100e-
003

0.0000 11.5863 11.5863 2.7800e-
003

0.0000 11.6557
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 4.7000e-
004

0.0108 3.6000e-
003

4.0000e-
005

1.1900e-
003

1.2000e-
004

1.3100e-
003

3.4000e-
004

1.1000e-
004

4.6000e-
004

0.0000 3.6956 3.6956 2.0000e-
005

5.4000e-
004

3.8565
Worker 2.5800e-
003

1.8600e-
003

0.0209 6.0000e-
005

6.5000e-
003

4.0000e-
005

6.5300e-
003

1.7300e-
003

3.0000e-
005

1.7600e-
003

0.0000 5.2817 5.2817 1.8000e-
004

1.6000e-
004

5.3346
Total 3.0500e-
003

0.0127 0.0245 1.0000e-
004

7.6900e-
003

1.6000e-
004

7.8400e-
003

2.0700e-
003

1.4000e-
004

2.2200e-
003

0.0000 8.9773 8.9773 2.0000e-
004

7.0000e-
004

9.1911
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:43 AMPage 17 of 37 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 705

0.0781 0.0818 1.3000e-
004

4.0500e-
003

3.8100e-
003

0.0000 11.5863 11.5863 2.7800e-
003

0.0000 11.6556
Total 8.5300e-
003

0.0781 0.0818 1.3000e-
004

4.0500e-
003

3.8100e-
003

0.0000 11.5863 11.5863 2.7800e-
003

0.0000 11.6556
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 4.7000e-
004

0.0108 3.6000e-
003

4.0000e-
005

1.1400e-
003

1.2000e-
004

1.2600e-
003

3.3000e-
004

1.1000e-
004

4.4000e-
004

0.0000 3.6956 3.6956 2.0000e-
005

5.4000e-
004

3.8565
Worker 2.5800e-
003

1.8600e-
003

0.0209 6.0000e-
005

6.1600e-
003

4.0000e-
005

6.1900e-
003

1.6400e-
003

3.0000e-
005

1.6800e-
003

0.0000 5.2817 5.2817 1.8000e-
004

1.6000e-
004

5.3346
Total 3.0500e-
003

0.0127 0.0245 1.0000e-
004

7.3000e-
003

1.6000e-
004

7.4500e-
003

1.9700e-
003

1.4000e-
004

2.1200e-
003

0.0000 8.9773 8.9773 2.0000e-
004

7.0000e-
004

9.1911
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:43 AMPage 18 of 37 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 706

3.6 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.2045 1.8700 2.1117 3.5000e-
003

0.0910 0.0910 0.0856 0.0856 0.0000 301.3462 301.3462 0.0717 0.0000 303.1383 Total 0.2045 1.8700 2.1117 3.5000e-
003

0.0910 0.0910 0.0856 0.0856 0.0000 301.3462 301.3462 0.0717 0.0000 303.1383 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 7.3100e-
003

0.2332 0.0815 9.7000e-
004

0.0310 1.5300e-
003

0.0325 8.9500e-
003

1.4600e-
003

0.0104 0.0000 93.0342 93.0342 4.0000e-
004

0.0135 97.0768
Worker 0.0622 0.0422 0.4987 1.4400e-
003

0.1689 8.8000e-
004

0.1698 0.0449 8.1000e-
004

0.0457 0.0000 133.8128 133.8128 4.2300e-
003

3.8800e-
003
135.0741
Total 0.0695 0.2754 0.5802 2.4100e-
003

0.1999 2.4100e-
003

0.2023 0.0539 2.2700e-
003

0.0561 0.0000 226.8470 226.8470 4.6300e-
003

0.0174 232.1509
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:43 AMPage 19 of 37 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 707

0.0910 0.0910 0.0856 0.0856 0.0000 301.3458 301.3458 0.0717 0.0000 303.1380 Total 0.2045 1.8700 2.1117 3.5000e-
003

0.0910 0.0910 0.0856 0.0856 0.0000 301.3458 301.3458 0.0717 0.0000 303.1380 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 7.3100e-
003

0.2332 0.0815 9.7000e-
004

0.0297 1.5300e-
003

0.0312 8.6300e-
003

1.4600e-
003

0.0101 0.0000 93.0342 93.0342 4.0000e-
004

0.0135 97.0768
Worker 0.0622 0.0422 0.4987 1.4400e-
003

0.1601 8.8000e-
004

0.1610 0.0428 8.1000e-
004

0.0436 0.0000 133.8128 133.8128 4.2300e-
003

3.8800e-
003
135.0741
Total 0.0695 0.2754 0.5802 2.4100e-
003

0.1898 2.4100e-
003

0.1922 0.0514 2.2700e-
003

0.0537 0.0000 226.8470 226.8470 4.6300e-
003

0.0174 232.1509
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:43 AMPage 20 of 37 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 708

3.6 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1126 1.0285 1.2368 2.0600e-
003

0.0469 0.0469 0.0441 0.0441 0.0000 177.3646 177.3646 0.0419 0.0000 178.4131 Total 0.1126 1.0285 1.2368 2.0600e-
003

0.0469 0.0469 0.0441 0.0441 0.0000 177.3646 177.3646 0.0419 0.0000 178.4131 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 4.0800e-
003

0.1367 0.0457 5.6000e-
004

0.0182 8.9000e-
004

0.0191 5.2700e-
003

8.5000e-
004

6.1200e-
003

0.0000 54.0025 54.0025 2.2000e-
004

7.8700e-
003

56.3529
Worker 0.0341 0.0219 0.2721 8.2000e-
004

0.0994 4.9000e-
004

0.0999 0.0264 4.5000e-
004

0.0269 0.0000 76.8248 76.8248 2.2500e-
003

2.1100e-
003

77.5099
Total 0.0382 0.1586 0.3178 1.3800e-
003

0.1176 1.3800e-
003

0.1190 0.0317 1.3000e-
003

0.0330 0.0000 130.8273 130.8273 2.4700e-
003

9.9800e-
003
133.8628
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:43 AMPage 21 of 37 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 709

0.0469 0.0469 0.0441 0.0441 0.0000 177.3644 177.3644 0.0419 0.0000 178.4129 Total 0.1126 1.0285 1.2368 2.0600e-
003

0.0469 0.0469 0.0441 0.0441 0.0000 177.3644 177.3644 0.0419 0.0000 178.4129 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 4.0800e-
003

0.1367 0.0457 5.6000e-
004

0.0175 8.9000e-
004

0.0183 5.0800e-
003

8.5000e-
004

5.9300e-
003

0.0000 54.0025 54.0025 2.2000e-
004

7.8700e-
003

56.3529
Worker 0.0341 0.0219 0.2721 8.2000e-
004

0.0942 4.9000e-
004

0.0947 0.0252 4.5000e-
004

0.0256 0.0000 76.8248 76.8248 2.2500e-
003

2.1100e-
003

77.5099
Total 0.0382 0.1586 0.3178 1.3800e-
003

0.1117 1.3800e-
003

0.1131 0.0302 1.3000e-
003

0.0315 0.0000 130.8273 130.8273 2.4700e-
003

9.9800e-
003
133.8628
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:43 AMPage 22 of 37 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 710

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 1.0335 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.8900e-
003

0.0262 0.0389 6.0000e-
005

1.3100e-
003

0.0000 5.4895 5.4895 3.1000e-
004

0.0000 5.4972
Total 1.0374 0.0262 0.0389 6.0000e-
005

1.3100e-
003

0.0000 5.4895 5.4895 3.1000e-
004

0.0000 5.4972
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.9400e-
003

1.2400e-
003

0.0155 5.0000e-
005

5.6500e-
003

3.0000e-
005

5.6800e-
003

1.5000e-
003

3.0000e-
005

1.5300e-
003

0.0000 4.3712 4.3712 1.3000e-
004

1.2000e-
004

4.4102
Total 1.9400e-
003

1.2400e-
003

0.0155 5.0000e-
005

5.6500e-
003

3.0000e-
005

5.6800e-
003

1.5000e-
003

3.0000e-
005

1.5300e-
003

0.0000 4.3712 4.3712 1.3000e-
004

1.2000e-
004

4.4102
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:43 AMPage 23 of 37 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 711

0.0262 0.0389 6.0000e-
005

1.3100e-
003

0.0000 5.4895 5.4895 3.1000e-
004

0.0000 5.4972
Total 1.0374 0.0262 0.0389 6.0000e-
005

1.3100e-
003

0.0000 5.4895 5.4895 3.1000e-
004

0.0000 5.4972
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.9400e-
003

1.2400e-
003

0.0155 5.0000e-
005

5.3600e-
003

3.0000e-
005

5.3900e-
003

1.4300e-
003

3.0000e-
005

1.4600e-
003

0.0000 4.3712 4.3712 1.3000e-
004

1.2000e-
004

4.4102
Total 1.9400e-
003

1.2400e-
003

0.0155 5.0000e-
005

5.3600e-
003

3.0000e-
005

5.3900e-
003

1.4300e-
003

3.0000e-
005

1.4600e-
003

0.0000 4.3712 4.3712 1.3000e-
004

1.2000e-
004

4.4102
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:43 AMPage 24 of 37 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 712

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.5254 1.1360 4.9717 0.0111 1.0299 0.0121 1.0420 0.2756 0.0115 0.2871 0.0000 1,044.547 5 1,044.547
5 0.0591 0.0668 1,065.934
3 Unmitigated 0.5254 1.1360 4.9717 0.0111 1.0299 0.0121 1.0420 0.2756 0.0115 0.2871 0.0000 1,044.547 5 1,044.547
5 0.0591 0.0668 1,065.934
3 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments Mid Rise 0.490419 0.048398 0.169688 0.158955 0.035733 0.008666 0.009296 0.040569 0.000480 0.000312 0.031681 0.000875 0.004926 Parking Lot 0.490419 0.048398 0.169688 0.158955 0.035733 0.008666 0.009296 0.040569 0.000480 0.000312 0.031681 0.000875 0.004926 Regional Shopping Center 0.490419 0.048398 0.169688 0.158955 0.035733 0.008666 0.009296 0.040569 0.000480 0.000312 0.031681 0.000875 0.004926

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 63.6444 63.6444 0.0103 1.2500e- 003

64.2737
Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 63.6444 63.6444 0.0103 1.2500e- 003

64.2737
NaturalGas
Mitigated

7.1400e-
003

0.0611 0.0262 3.9000e-
004

4.9400e-
003

0.0000 70.7097 70.7097 1.3600e-
003

1.3000e-
003

71.1299
NaturalGas
Unmitigated

7.1400e-
003

0.0611 0.0262 3.9000e-
004

4.9400e-
003

0.0000 70.7097 70.7097 1.3600e-
003

1.3000e-
003

71.1299

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:43 AMPage 26 of 37 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 714

1.31592e
+006

7.1000e-
003

0.0606 0.0258 3.9000e-
004

4.9000e-
003

0.0000 70.2227 70.2227 1.3500e-
003

1.2900e-
003

70.6400
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Regional
Shopping Center
9126 5.0000e-
005

4.5000e-
004

3.8000e-
004

0.0000 3.0000e-
005

3.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.4870 0.4870 1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.4899
Total 7.1500e-
003

0.0611 0.0262 3.9000e-
004

4.9300e-
003

0.0000 70.7097 70.7097 1.3600e-
003

1.3000e-
003

71.1299
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:43 AMPage 27 of 37 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 715

1.31592e
+006

7.1000e-
003

0.0606 0.0258 3.9000e-
004

4.9000e-
003

0.0000 70.2227 70.2227 1.3500e-
003

1.2900e-
003

70.6400
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Regional
Shopping Center
9126 5.0000e-
005

4.5000e-
004

3.8000e-
004

0.0000 3.0000e-
005

3.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.4870 0.4870 1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.4899
Total 7.1500e-
003

0.0611 0.0262 3.9000e-
004

4.9300e-
003

0.0000 70.7097 70.7097 1.3600e-
003

1.3000e-
003

71.1299
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:43 AMPage 28 of 37 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 716

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise
607030 56.1647 9.0900e-
003

1.1000e-
003

56.7200
Parking Lot 40320 3.7306 6.0000e-
004

7.0000e-
005

3.7675
Regional
Shopping Center
40521 3.7492 6.1000e-
004

7.0000e-
005

3.7862
Total 63.6444 0.0103 1.2400e-
003

64.2737
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:43 AMPage 29 of 37 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 717

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise
607030 56.1647 9.0900e-
003

1.1000e-
003

56.7200
Parking Lot 40320 3.7306 6.0000e-
004

7.0000e-
005

3.7675
Regional
Shopping Center
40521 3.7492 6.1000e-
004

7.0000e-
005

3.7862
Total 63.6444 0.0103 1.2400e-
003

64.2737
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:43 AMPage 30 of 37 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 718

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.7882 0.0187 1.6221 9.0000e-
005

8.9800e-
003

0.0000 2.6520 2.6520 2.5600e-
003

0.0000 2.7159
Unmitigated 0.7882 0.0187 1.6221 9.0000e-
005

8.9800e-
003

0.0000 2.6520 2.6520 2.5600e-
003

0.0000 2.7159

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.1034 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.6358 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 0.0490 0.0187 1.6221 9.0000e-
005

8.9800e-
003

0.0000 2.6520 2.6520 2.5600e-
003

0.0000 2.7159
Total 0.7882 0.0187 1.6221 9.0000e-
005

8.9800e-
003

0.0000 2.6520 2.6520 2.5600e-
003

0.0000 2.7159
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:43 AMPage 31 of 37 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 719

Install Low Flow Bathroom Faucet
Install Low Flow Kitchen Faucet
Install Low Flow Toilet
Install Low Flow Shower
Use Water Efficient Irrigation System

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

0.1034 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

8.9800e-
003

0.0000 2.6520 2.6520 2.5600e-
003

0.0000 2.7159
Total 0.7882 0.0187 1.6221 9.0000e-
005

8.9800e-
003

0.0000 2.6520 2.6520 2.5600e-
003

0.0000 2.7159
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:43 AMPage 32 of 37 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 720

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 8.8970 0.2752 6.6000e-
003

17.7425
Unmitigated 10.7484 0.3439 8.2400e-
003

21.8016

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise

10.2292 /

6.44883

10.4548 0.3345 8.0100e-
003

21.2044
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Regional
Shopping Center

0.288883 /

0.177057

0.2936 9.4500e-
003

2.3000e-
004

0.5972
Total 10.7484 0.3439 8.2400e-
003

21.8016
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:43 AMPage 33 of 37 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 721

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise

8.18335 /

6.05545

8.6541 0.2676 6.4200e-
003

17.2567
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Regional
Shopping Center

0.231106 /

0.166257

0.2429 7.5600e-
003

1.8000e-
004

0.4858
Total 8.8970 0.2752 6.6000e-
003

17.7425
Mitigated

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
Institute Recycling and Composting Services

8.0 Waste Detail
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:43 AMPage 34 of 37 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 722

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 7.7451 0.4577 0.0000 19.1882
Unmitigated 15.4902 0.9155 0.0000 38.3764
Category/Year

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise

72.22 14.6600 0.8664 0.0000 36.3196
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Regional
Shopping Center

4.09 0.8302 0.0491 0.0000 2.0569
Total 15.4902 0.9155 0.0000 38.3764
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:43 AMPage 35 of 37 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 723

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise

36.11 7.3300 0.4332 0.0000 18.1598
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Regional
Shopping Center

2.045 0.4151 0.0245 0.0000 1.0284
Total 7.7451 0.4577 0.0000 19.1882
Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:43 AMPage 36 of 37 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 724

11.0 Vegetation
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 4/21/2022 11:43 AMPage 37 of 37 1550 San Juan - San Benito County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied E.3.d
Packet Pg. 725

Appendix F
Hazards Materials Assessment/Phase I ESA

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 726

MEMORANDUM
To: Mr. Abraham Prado and Ms. Ambur Cameron
City of Hollister Development Services Department
375 Fifth Street
Hollister, CA 95023
Date: August 24, 2020
Subject: Mixed-Use Residential Project at 1550 San Juan Road – Hazardous Materials Assessment

PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (Kimley-Horn) as requested by the City of Hollister is contracted to provide an assessment of the potential for hazardous materials at a project located at 1550 San Juan Road in the City of Hollister. The Project proposes a mixed-use development that consists of 157 multi- family residential units, a community building and 2,000 square feet of commercial space (see Exhibit 1). The Project is located in the West Gateway Mixed-Use Zoning District. The Project is also located along San Juan Road/4th Street, which has a West Gateway Beautification Project that proposes to construct a roundabout at the intersection of 4th Street and Graf Road.

PURPOSE
The purpose of this letter is to provide an initial assessment of the likelihood of the presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products on the Site under conditions indicative of an existing release, past release, or a material threat of a release that could affect the Site, based on a review of regulatory agency databases and a site visit. This assessment is not consistent with the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard Method E 1527-13 and should be used for planning purposes only.

SCOPE OF SERVICES
The scope of services for this assessment consisted of 1) an environmental database search and 2) a site visit.

ENVIRONMENTAL DATABASE SEARCH
Kimley-Horn performed a regulatory database search of the Department of Toxic Substances Control Envirostor website ( http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/) and the State Water Resources Control Board's (SWRCB) Geotracker website ( http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/) to identify hazardous material regulated facilities within or proximate to the Site.

SITE RECONNAISSANCE

Reconnaissance Information
Kimley-Horn Field Personnel Tad Stearn and Noemi Wyss
Site Reconnaissance Date June 29, 2020
Weather Conditions Clear and sunny
E.3.d
Packet Pg. 727

Page 2 ends

kimley-horn.com 401 B Street, Suite 600, San Diego, CA 92101 619-234-9411

Escort Kimley-Horn staff were not escorted during the site visit.

The gate was unlocked by owner prior to arrival.

Limitations No limitations noted

SUBJECT PROPERTY OBSERVATIONS
The Site consists of a gently sloping vacant lot fronting San Juan Road (Exhibit 1). The Site is located adjacent to and behind a mini-mart and gas station to the north. A commercial fence company and auto repair/wrecking yard are located immediately to the west. A mobile home park is located to the east. A fenced industrial wastewater pond (used seasonally for agriculture processing water) is located to the south adjacent to the San Benito River basin.

The Site is currently vacant and weedy and appears to be occasionally mowed. Besides low grassy weeds, the site six trees. The only structure on the site is a metal-clad barn or repair shop of unknown age or origin. There are no visible utilities except for a single wood utility pole that is no longer connected to above ground wires. A capped probe that appears to be a test well is located near the southern property line. No above ground chemical, waste storage, litter or waste streams were observed on the site. Additionally, no exterior observations such as stressed vegetation, or strong odors were noted.

Down the center of the Site is the remnants of an older asphalt path or driveway that is deteriorating.

Based on historical aerial images, this driveway – now overgrown – appears to have once serviced the metal barn.

The adjacent auto repair/wrecking yard and wastewater ponds may have impacted soil or groundwater.

As such, there is the potential for contaminated media to be encountered during the planned activities for the Project. These facilities are considered environmental concerns for the subject Site.

Ground photographs are included in Attachment A.

ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSIONS
Kimley-Horn’s review of the referenced databases also considered the potential or likelihood of contamination from adjoining and nearby sites. To evaluate which of the adjoining and nearby sites identified in the regulatory database search present an environmental risk to the subject property, Kimley-Horn considered the following criteria:
 The topographic position of the property relative to the subject property;  The direction and distance of the identified facility from the subject property;  Local soil conditions in the subject property area;
 The known and/or inferred groundwater flow direction and depth in the subject property area.  The status of the respective regulatory agency-required investigations and/or cleanup associated with the identified facility; and
 Surface and subsurface obstructions and diversions (e.g., buildings, roads, sewer systems, utility service lines, rivers, lakes, and ditches) located between the identified site and the subject property.

Only those sites that are judged to present a potential environmental risk to the subject property and/or warrant additional clarification are further evaluated. Using the referenced criteria, and based upon a review of readily available information contained within the regulatory database search, Kimley-Horn did not identify adjoining (i.e., bordering) or nearby sites (e.g., properties within a 0.25-mile radius) E.3.d
Packet Pg. 728

Page 3 ends

kimley-horn.com 401 B Street, Suite 600, San Diego, CA 92101 619-234-9411

listed in the regulatory database report that were judged to present a potential environmental risk to the subject property with the exception of the following facilities which need further evaluation.  Shop N Save (formerly Victory Gas & Food located at 1615 San Juan Road, immediately adjacent to the Site to the east) - This facility is listed on the SWRCB geotracker website ( http://geotracker.swrcb.ca.gov/ accessed on July 14, 2020) as a leaking underground storage tank (LUST) case. The potential contaminant of concern is gasoline, and the potential media is listed as groundwater (other than drinking water). There is limited information regarding this facility; however, it is listed as case closed on May 28, 2004. Given its case closure status, this facility is not considered an environmental concern for the subject Site.  Roadrunner (905 San Juan Road, approximately 0.36 miles to the east of the Site) - This facility is listed on the SWRCB geotracker website ( http://geotracker.swrcb.ca.gov/ accessed on July 14, 2020) as a leaking underground storage tank (LUST) case. The potential contaminant of concern is gasoline, and the potential media of concern was listed as under investigation. There is limited information regarding this facility; however, it is listed as case closed on December 16, 1998. Given its case closure status, this facility is not considered an environmental concern for the subject Site.

Kimley-Horn was retained to perform a hazardous materials assessment and performed only those tasks described in this letter. This assessment identified potential environmental concerns for the subject Site (adjacent auto repair/wrecking yard and wastewater ponds). It is Kimley-Horn’s understanding that a private developer intends on developing the Site as a mixed-use development that consists of multi-family residential units, a community building and commercial space. As such, the need for the preparation of a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment for this Site in compliance with the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process / Designation E 1527-13 (ASTM Standard Practice E 1527-13) is needed to adequately determine the potential for localized impacts. If warranted as a result of the Phase I ESA, limited soil and groundwater investigation may also be necessary.

This report is based on our knowledge as of August 24, 2020. New issues may arise during development because of changes in governmental rules and policy, changed circumstances, or unforeseen conditions.

Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. appreciates the opportunity to provide you with these services.

Should you have any questions or comments regarding this information please contact Karina Fidler at (619) 744-0138.

Sincerely,

Karina Fidler, AICP, CPESC
Environmental Professional
E.3.d
Packet Pg. 729

Page 4 ends

kimley-horn.com 401 B Street, Suite 600, San Diego, CA 92101 619-234-9411

Attachments:

Exhibit 1 – Conceptual Layout
Attachment A – Site Photographs

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 730

EXHIBIT 1

CONCEPTUAL LAYOUT

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 731

ATTACHMENT A

SITE PHOTOGRAPHS

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 732

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 733

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 734

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 735

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 736

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 737

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 738

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 739

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 740

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 741

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 742

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 743

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 744

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 745

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 746

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 747

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 748

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 749

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 750

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 751

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 752

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 753

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 754

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 755

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 756

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 757

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 758

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 759

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 760

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 761

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 762

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 763

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 764

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 765

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 766

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 767

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 768

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 769

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 770

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 771

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 772

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 773

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 774

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 775

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 776

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 777

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 778

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 779

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 780

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 781

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 782

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 783

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 784

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 785

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 786

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 787

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 788

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 789

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 790

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 791

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 792

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 793

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 794

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 795

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 796

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 797

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 798

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 799

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 800

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 801

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 802

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 803

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 804

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 805

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 806

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 807

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 808

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 809

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 810

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 811

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 812

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 813

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 814

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 815

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 816

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 817

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 818

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 819

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 820

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 821

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 822

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 823

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 824

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 825

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 826

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 827

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 828

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 829

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 830

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 831

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 832

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 833

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 834

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 835

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 836

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 837

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 838

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 839

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 840

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 841

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 842

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 843

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 844

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 845

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 846

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 847

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 848

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 849

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 850

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 851

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 852

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 853

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 854

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 855

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 856

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 857

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 858

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 859

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 860

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 861

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 862

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 863

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 864

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 865

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 866

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 867

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 868

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 869

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 870

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 871

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 872

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 873

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 874

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 875

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 876

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 877

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 878

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 879

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 880

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 881

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 882

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 883

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 884

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 885

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 886

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 887

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 888

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 889

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 890

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 891

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 892

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 893

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 894

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 895

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 896

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 897

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 898

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 899

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 900

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 901

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 902

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 903

E.3.d
Packet Pg. 904

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 905

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 906

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 907

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 908

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 909

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 910

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 911

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 912

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 913

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 914

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 915

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 916

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 917

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 918

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 919

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 920

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 921

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 922

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 923

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 924

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 925

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 926

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 927

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 928

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 929

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 930

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 931

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 932

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 933

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 934

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 935

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 936

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 937

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 938

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 939

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 940

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 941

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 942

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 943

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 944

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 945

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 946

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 947

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 948

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 949

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 950

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 951

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 952

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 953

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 954

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 955

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 956

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 957

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 958

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 959

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 960

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 961

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 962

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 963

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 964

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 965

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 966

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 967

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 968

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 969

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 970

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 971

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 972

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 973

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 974

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 975

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 976

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 977

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 978

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 979

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 980

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 981

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 982

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 983

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 984

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 985

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 986

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 987

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 988

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 989

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 990

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 991

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 992

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 993

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 994

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 995

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 996

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 997

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 998

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 999

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 1000

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 1001

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 1002

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 1003

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 1004

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 1005

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 1006

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 1007

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 1008

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 1009

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 1010

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 1011

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 1012

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 1013

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 1014

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 1015

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 1016

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 1017

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 1018

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 1019

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 1020

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 1021

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 1022

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 1023

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 1024

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 1025

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 1026

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 1027

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 1028

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 1029

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 1030

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 1031

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 1032

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 1033

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 1034

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 1035

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 1036

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 1037

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 1038

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 1039

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 1040

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 1041

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 1042

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 1043

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 1044

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 1045

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 1046

E.3.e
Packet Pg. 1047

Appendix G
Acoustical Data
E.3.e
Packet Pg. 1048

FHWA Highway Noise Prediction Model (FHWA-RD-77-108) with California Vehicle Noise (CALVENO) Emission Levels Project Name: Sanchez Mesa Apartments Project
Project Number: 197008182.1.650
Scenario:Existing
Ldn/CNEL:Ldn
Assumed 24-Hour Traffic Distribution: Day Evening Night Total ADT Volumes 77.70% 12.70% 9.60%
Medium-Duty Trucks 87.43% 5.05% 7.52%
Heavy-Duty Trucks 89.10% 2.84% 8.06%
Vehicle Mix Distance from Centerline of Roadway
Median ADT Speed Alpha Medium Heavy Ldn at Distance to Contour # Roadway Segment Lanes Width Volume (mph) Factor Trucks Trucks 100 Feet 70 Ldn 65 Ldn 60 Ldn 55 Ldn 3 San Juan Road Between SR-156 and Graf Rd 2 12 8,520 40 0 2.0% 1.0% 60.7 - - 117 371 4 San Juan Road Between Graf Rd and Project Hwy 2 12 8,900 40 0 2.0% 1.0% 60.9 - 39 123 388 5 San Juan Road Between Project Hwy and Miller Rd 2 12 9,410 40 0 2.0% 1.0% 61.1 - 41 130 410 6 San Juan Road Between Miller Road and Westside Blvd 2 12 12,850 40 0 2.0% 1.0% 62.5 - 56 177 560 1 Distance is from the centerline of the roadway segment to the receptor location. "-" = contour is located within the roadway right-of-way.

Page 1 ends

Hollister City CouncilNovember 6, 2023

Hollister City Council
November 6, 2023