Agenda — Jurupa Valley City Council, March 21, 2024 (part 2 of 3)

AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT UTILITY BILL ASSISTA NCE GRANT

AGREEMENT
This AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT GRANT AGREEMENT, is made and entered into as of February 15 , 2024 , between the CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY , a California municipal corporation (the "City"), and Santa Ana River Water Company , a community services district organized and operating pursuant to California Government Code Sections 61000 et seq. (the "Subrecipient "). In consideration of the purposes and terms of this Agreement, the parties agree as follows:

1. Recitals. The Parties agree that this Agreement is made with respect to the following facts and purposes:

A. On March 11, 2021, President Biden signed into law the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (“ARPA”). ARPA established the Coronavirus State Fiscal Recovery Fund and Coronavirus Local Fiscal Recovery Fund, which together make up the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (“SLFRF”) program. ARPA provides for $130.2 billion in funding for local governments to provide area-specific assistance to respond to and mitigate the negative effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on their communities. The City will receive approximately $28,077,013.00 in ARPA funding.

B. Based on the availability of ARPA-allocated funds, the City has decided to provide funding to the Subrecipient to further the purposes of the ARPA, as provided in this Agreement.

C. The purpose of this Agreement is to promote public health and address the negative economic impacts of the COVID-19 public health emergency by providing Sixty-Seven thousand six hundred and fifty-five dollars ($67,655) in ARPA funds to the Subrecipient for utility account credits for Jurupa Valley residents within the Subrecipient’s service area.

D. Subrecipient provides water, sewer and trash services for people within a portion of the City of Jurupa Valley.

E. During the COVID-19 Pandemic many customers of Subrecipient and other people in the City of Jurupa Valley were unable to pay all or portions of their water, sewer or trash bills or were otherwise adversely affected economically through loss of jobs, inability to work, need to care for ill family members, their own illness resulting from the COVID-19 Pandemic.

F. This Agreement will provide a means by which the City and Subrecipient can provide some financial assistance to those people in Jurupa Valley adversely affected by the COVID-19 Pandemic and customers of the Subrecipient.

2. Term. This Agreement shall become effective on March 21, 2024 (the “Effective Date”] and shall terminate on December 31, 2026, subject to early termination under section 7 (“Term of Agreement”).

Page 2 of 18 ends

3. Grant of ARPA Funds. The City shall disburse to the Subrecipient a total sum not to exceed Sixty-Seven thousand six hundred and fifty-five dollars ($67,655) in accordance with section 4 of this Agreement. The funds disbursed by the City under this Agreement are referred to as “ARPA funds.” In no instance will the City be liable for any payments or costs in excess of this amount, for any unauthorized or ineligible costs, or for costs incurred after the termination date described in Section 2.

4. Disbursement of ARPA Funds. The City will make payments to the Subrecipient of the ARPA Funds as follows:

A. Subrecipient shall file a written request with the City for disbursal of all or part of the ARPA Funds for Utility Account Credits which shall include a declaration that Subrecipient is ready to use the ARPA Funds for the Authorized activities. City shall disburse the ARPA Funds to Subrecipient for Utility Account Credits within fifteen (15) calendar days following this written request.
1) On a monthly basis, the Subrecipient shall provide the City with a written report on the progress made on the Authorized Activities in accordance with section 8(l) of this Agreement.
2) The City will notify the Subr ecipient within fifteen (15) calendar days following receipt of its request and written report of any circumstances or data identified by the City that would cause withholding of approval and subsequent payment.

B. On a monthly basis, Subrecipient shall provide to City a detailed and properly documented invoice for reimbursement of allowable expenses in administering this Agreement as provided in Attachments A, Authorized Activities, and Attachment B, Approved Budget . The invoice shall include a d etailed accounting of costs already incurred in sufficient detail for the City, in its opinion, to substantiate the costs.

5. Authorized Uses. The following terms apply to the Subrecipient's activities and expenditures related to this Agreement:

A. The Subrecipient may seek reimbursement solely for costs it incurs that are necessary to carry out the activities listed in Attachment ”A” (“Authorized Activities”) in accordance with the budget listed in Attachment “B” (“Approved Budget”). If a term included in Attachment “A” is stated as an obligation, then the Subrecipient is obligated to perform the term under this agreement.

B. The Subrecipient may seek reimbursement solely for eligible costs that it incurs between the Effective Date of this Agreement and December 31, 2026. If Subrecipient receives a refund or credit for any cost for which it received a payment of ARPA funds, Subrecipient shall return ARPA funds in an amount equal to the refund or credit to the City by check payable to the City and delivered to the City at the address shown in section 9 no later than ten (10) calendar days following receipt of such refund or credit, unless otherwise agreed to, in writing, by the City.

Page 3 of 18 ends

C. When incurring costs for which it will seek reimbursement under this Agreement, the Subrecipient is subject to the restrictions set forth in the ARPAA, as well as the Department of the Treasury's Final Rule, FAQs, Fact Sheet, and Compliance and Reporting Guidance (collectively the “ARPA Guidance”), as the Guidance may be amended from time to time. The ARPA Guidance can be found at https://home.treasury.gov/policy - issues/coronavirus/assistance -for -state -local -and -tribal -governments/state -and -local - fiscal -recovery -funds .

D. Any costs that are determined by subsequent audit to be unallowable are subject to repayment by the Subrecipient to the City within sixty (60) calendar days unless the City approves in writing an alternative repayment plan.

E. The Subrecipient shall not use the ARPA funds to supplant funding provided by the City to the Subrecipient under any other agreement. The Subrecipient shall include a term in every grant subaward agreement and contract that prohibits the subrecipient or contractor from using ARPA funds to supplant funding provided by the City directly or indirectly to the subrecipient or contractor.

F. If the Subrecipient has received other ARPA funds from the City or any other entity, or has received other federal funds (e.g., Coronavirus Relief Act funds, payroll protection act loan, etc.), Subrecipient shall not use the ARPA funds awarded pursuant to this agreement to pay for direct or indirect costs already covered by the other federal funds or ARPA fund payments.

6. Books and Records. During the term of this A greement and for five (5) years after the termination or expiration of this Agreement, the Subrecipient shall keep appropriate books, records, and accounts in connection with the ARPA funds and activities performed under this agreement and is subject to the following:

A. The Subrecipient shall maintain all records related to this agreement in accordance with generally accepted accounting practices, including the following records: (i) general ledger and subsidiary ledgers used to account for the receipt of ARPA funds and the disbursements of ARPA funds to meet eligible expenses; (ii) budget records for al l fiscal years covered by this A greement; (iii) payroll, time records, human resource records to support costs incurred for payroll expenses related to t his agreement; (iv) receipts of purchases made related to this agreement; (v) contracts and subcontracts entered into using ARPA funds and all documents related to such contracts; (vi) grant subaward agreements entered into using ARPA funds and all documen ts related to such awards; (vii) all documentation of reports, audits, and other monitoring of contractors, subcontractors, the Subrecipient, and subrecipient; (viii) all documentation supporting the performance outcomes of contracts, subcontracts, grant subaward agreements, and this agreement; (ix) all internal and external email/electronic communications related to use of ARPA funds; and (x) all investigative files and inquiry reports involving payment of ARPA funds.

B. The Subrecipient shall make its books, records, and accounts (both those that relate to this Agreement and those that do not), employees, performance-related records,

Page 4 of 18 ends

property, and equipment related to this Agreement available to the City, any independent auditor, the United States Department of the Treasury Office of Inspector General ("OIG"), and the Pandemic Relief Accountability Committee at all reasonable times so that the City, independent auditor, or OIG may determine whether the Subrecipient has complied with this Agreement. If the City requests, the Subrecipient shall obtain and provide to the City, at the Subrecipient 's sole cost, an independent financial audit of the Subrecipient 's use of the ARPA funds.

C. Upon demand by the City, given in accordance with section 9, the Subrecipient shall reimburse the City for all ARPA funds that the Accounting Manager, City Auditor, an independent auditor, or the OIG determines were expended for activities other than Authorized Activities in accordance with the ARPAA and the ARPA Guidance, with reimbursement to be by check payable to the City and delivered to the City at the address shown in section 9, Notice.

7. Termination. The City may terminate this Agreement if the City Manager determines that:

A. The Subrecipient has failed to perform, or has performed unsatisfactorily, any term of this Agreement, including failing to use the ARPA funds solely for Authorized Activities in accordance with the ARPA and the ARPA Guidance;
B. The Subrecipient has made (with or without knowledge) any material misrepresentation of any nature with respect to any information or statements furnished to City in connection with this Agreement; or
C. There is pending litigation with respect to the performance by Subrecipient of any of its duties or obligations under this Agreement that may materially jeopardize or adversely affect the undertaking of or the carrying out of the Authorized Activities.

8. Pass-through Entity and Subrecipient Requirements. The Subrecipient acknowledges that it is a pass-through entity and subrecipient as defined in title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations (“CFR”), section 200.1. In connection with its activities and expenditures related to this agreement, the Subrecipient shall do the following:

A. The Subrecipient shall comply with all federal laws, regulations, and terms of the ARPA Guidance that apply to a pass-through entity and subrecipient of a subaward of an ARPA fund, if any, including the ARPA and the applicable provisions of the CFR, as set forth in the federal Assistance Listing No. 21.027;
B. Pursuant to 2 CFR 200.332, the Subrecipient’s required subaward information is attached as Attachment “D”.

C. The Subrecipient shall maintain a valid SAM.gov registration.

D. The Subrecipient shall comply with the applicable cost principles in title 2, CFR, Part 200, Subpart E and, to the extent required, costs must be reasonable, eligible, and allocable as provided in title 2, CFR, sections 100.404 and 200.405.

Page 5 of 18 ends

E. The Subrecipient shall not seek reimbursement for pre-award costs, as defined in title 2, CFR, section 200.458.

F. The Subrecipient shall comply with all laws and regulations, including title 2, CFR, Part 200, subpart D, when purchasing equipment or property.

G. The Subrecipient shall comply with the audit requirements in title 2, CFR, Part 200, Subpart F.

H. The Subrecipient shall comply with the provisions of title 24, CFR, Part 24, relating to the employment, engagement of services, awarding of contracts, or funding of any contractors or subcontractors during any period of debarment, suspension, or placement in ineligibility status.

I. The Subrecipient shall enter into a written contract when it purchases goods or services using ARPA funds. All procurement contracts using ARPA funds shall be consistent with the procurement standards set forth in title 2, CFR, sections 200.317 through 200.327, as applicable.

J. The Subrecipient shall not grant any subaward without the express written consent of the City.

K. On a monthly basis, the Subrecipient shall provide the City with a written report on the progress made on the Authorized Activities in a form approved by the City.

L. The Subrecipient shall provide the City with a closeout report that includes all the following: (i) total number of delinquent utility accounts resolved with the ARPA funds as well as the total dollar amount; (ii) the amount of each contract for the purchase of goods or services that is paid for in whole or in part with ARPA funds, if any; (iii) a copy of each contract for the purchase of goods or services that is paid for in whole or in part with ARPA funds, if any; (iv) all information required to be reported under Attachment “A”; and (v) any other information that the City may request to demonstrate that the ARPA funds were used solely for Authorized Activities in accordance with the ARPA and the AR PA Guidance. The Subrecipient shall include with the report a certification that it used the ARP A funds solely for Authorized Activities in accordance with the ARPA and the ARPA Guidance. The Subrecipient shall submit the closeout report and certification no later than forty five ( 45) days following the final disbursement of ARP A funds under this Agreement.

9. Notices. Any notice, request, report or demand under this Agreement must be in writing and will be considered properly given and effective only when mailed or delivered in the manner provided by this section 9 to the persons identified below or their successors. A mailed notice, application, request, report, or demand will be effective or will be considered to have been given on the third calendar day after it is deposited in the United States Mail (certified mail), addressed as set forth below, with postage prepaid. A notice, application, request, report, or demand sent in any other manner will be effective or will be considered properly given when actually delivered.

Any party may charge its address for these purposes by giving written notice of the change to the other party in the manner provided in this section.

Page 6 of 18 ends

If to the City:

City of Jurupa Valley
8930 Limonite Avenue
Jurupa Valley, California 92509
Attn: Kevin Ryan, Project Manager
If to the Subrecipient :

Santa Ana River Water Company
10530 54 th St.

Jurupa Valley, CA 91752
Attn: John Lopez

10. Indemnity. The Subrecipient shall defend, hold harmless and indemnify the City, its officers and employees, and each and every one of them, from and against any and all actions, damages, costs, liabilities, claims, demands, losses, judgments, penalties, costs and expenses of every type and description, including, but not limited to, any fees and/or costs reasonably incurred by the City's staff attorneys or outside attorneys and any fees and expenses incurred in enforcing this provision (collectively, "Liabilities"), including Liabilities arising from personal injury or death, damage to personal, real or intellectual property or the environment, contractual or other economic damages, or regulatory penalties, arising out of or in any way related to this Agreement, whether or not (i) such Liabilities are caused in part by a party indemnified hereunder or (ii) such Liabilities are litigated, settled or reduced to judgment, except that the foregoing indemnity does not apply to liability for any damage or expense for death or bodily injury to persons or damage to property to the extent arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City, its agents, servants, or independent contractors who are directly responsible to City, except when such agents, servants, or independent contr actors are under the direct supervision and control of the Subrecipient . The Subrecipient ’s indemnifications and obligations under this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this agreement.

11. Conflicts of Interest. The Subrecipient , its offi cers, directors, employees, agents, and subcontractors shall not have or acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, that creates an actual or apparent conflict with the interests of the City or that in any way hinders the Subrecipient's performance under this agreement. The Subrecipient shall disclose, in writing to the City, any potential conflict of interest affecting the awarded funds in accordance with title 2, CFR, section 200.112 and must maintain a conflict of interest policy consistent with title 2, CFR, section 200.318, subsection (c).

12. Prohibition of Expending State or Federal Funds for Lobbying.

A. The Subrecipient certifies, to the best of its knowledge or belief, that:
1) No federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the Subrecipient, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any State or Federal agency, a Member of the State Legislature or United States

Page 7 of 18 ends

Congress, an officer or employee of the Legislature or Congress, or any employee of a Member of the Legislature or Congress in connection with the awarding of any State or Federal contract, the making of any State or Federal grant, the making of any State or Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any State or Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement. 2) If any funds other than Federally appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any Federal agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or any employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative Agreement, the Subrecipient will complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions.

B. This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this agreement was entered into. This certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this Agreement imposed by Section 1352, Title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification will be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.

C. The Subrecipient also agrees, by signing this Agreement, that it will require that the language of this certification be included in all lower tier contracts and subawards that exceed $100,000, and that all such subcontractors and subrecipient shall certify and disclose accordingly.

D. The Subrecipient certifies or affirms the truthfulness and accuracy of each statement of its certification and any disclosure. In addition, the Subrecipient understands and agrees that the provisions of Chapter 38 of title 31 of U.S. Code, Administrative Remedies for False Claims and Statements, apply to this certification and any disclosure.

13. Drug -free Certification. By signing this Agreement, the Subrecipient hereby certifies under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the Subrecipient will comply with the requirements of title 31, CFR, Part 20 (Government-wide Requirements for Drug-Free Workplace) and the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1990 (Cal. Gov. Code, §§ 8350, et seq.).

14. Environmental Compliance. The Subrecipient shall comply with all generally applicable federal environmental laws and regulations, including but not limited to the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. §7401 et seq.), the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. §1251 et seq.), Executive Order 11738, all Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") Regulations (title 40, CFR) and all applicable standards, orders or regulations issued pursuant thereto. The Subrecipient agrees to report any violation of these statutes and regulations to the City and understands and agrees that the City will, in turn, report each violation, as required, to assure notification to the appropriate federal agency and EPA Regional Office.

15. Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisitions. The Subrecipient shall comply with the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisitions Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. §§ 4601-4655) and implementing regulations, to the extent applicable.

Page 8 of 18 ends

16. Hatch Act. Any Subrecipient that is a public agency shall comply, as applicable, with requirements of the Hatch Act (5 U.S.C. §§ 1501-1508 and 7324-7328), which limits certain political activities of state or local government employees whose principal employment is in connection with an activity financed in whole or in part by federal funds.

17. False Claims. The Subrecipient understands that making false statements or claims in connection with this award is a violation of federal law and may result in criminal, civil, or administrative sanctions, including fines, imprisonment, civil damages and penalties, debarment from participating in federal awards or contracts, and/or any other remedy available by law.

18. Labor Standards. The Subrecipient shall comply with the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act and all other applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations pertaining to labor standards insofar as those act apply to the performance of this Agreement.

The Subrecipient shall maintain documentation which demonstrates compliance with hour and wages requirements of this part. Such documentation shall be made available to the City for review upon request.

19. Publications. Any publications produced with funds from this award must display the following language: "This project [is being] [was] supported, in whole or in part, by federal award number [enter project FAIN] awarded to [name of Recipient] by the U.S. Department of the Treasury."

20. Protections For Whistleblowers. In accordance with section 4712 of title 41 of the U.S.

Code, the Subrecipient may not discharge, demote, or otherwise discriminate against any employee in reprisal for disclosing an information the employee reasonably believes is evidence of gross mismanagement of this Agreement, a gross waste of federal funds, an abuse of authority related to this Agreement, a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety, or a violation of law, rule, or regulation related to this agreement. Subrecipient shall inform its employees, in writing, of the rights and remedies provided to them under this section in the predominant native language of the workforce.

21. Licensure. The Subrecipient certifies that it shall hold all applicable licenses and/or certifications required by Subrecipient’s profession and maintain them throughout the term of this Agreement, and that the Subrecipient’s performance shall meet the standards of licensure/certification.

22. Independent Contractor. The Subrecipient understands that it is an independent contractor, not an employee of the City, and is not eligible for any employee benefits, including but not limited to unemployment, health/dental insurance, worker’s compensation, vacation or sick leave.

23. Prevailing Wage. If any of the activities listed in Attachment “A” are subject to the prevailing wage requirements under section 1720 et seq. of the California Labor Code, then the Subrecipient shall require its contractor and subcontractors to adhere to those requirements, including the following: contracts between the contractor and subcontractors must include provisions requiring the payment of prevailing wage; the contractor shall monitor subcontractors' payment of prevailing wage by periodically reviewing certified payroll

Page 9 of 18 ends

records and diligently taking corrective action if the subcontractors fail to pay prevailing wage; contractor and subcontractors shall maintain certified payroll records and time records. The contractor to whom a contract is awarded, and any subcontractor under such contractor, shall not pay less than the specified prevailing wage; contractor and subcontractors are subject to penalties for violations of prevailing wage provisions. The Subrecipient shall indemnify, hold harmless, and defend the City from all additional wages, benefits, fees, damages, penalties, fines, legal fees, court costs, arbitration costs, and other costs arising from the Subrecipient 's or its contractor's improper application of California's prevailing wage laws to the activities listed in Attachment “A”. If all applicable labor compliance requirements are not met, then upon demand by the City, given in accordance with section 9, the Subrecipient shall reimburse the City for all ARPA funds spent on construction or related services, in whole or in part, with reimbursement to be by check payable to the City and delivered to the City at the address shown in section 9.

24. Miscellaneous.

A. Assignment. The Subrecipient may not assign or otherwise transfer this Agreement or any interest in it without the City's written consent, which the City may grant or deny in its sole discretion. An assignment or other transfer made contrary to this section is void.

B. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement binds and inures to the benefit of the successors and assigns of the parties. This section does not constitute the City's consent to any assignment of this agreement or any interest in this Agreement.

C. Interpretation. This agreement is to be interpreted and applied in accordance with California law.

D. Attachments. Attachments “A”, “B”, “C”, and “D” are attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full.

E. Waiver of Breach. A party's failure to insist on strict performance of this agreement or to exercise any right or remedy upon the other party's breach of this Agreement will not constitute a waiver of the performance, right, or remedy. A party's waiver of the other party's breach of any term or provision in this Agreement is not a continuing waiver or a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same or any other term or provision. A waiver is binding only if set forth in writing and signed by the waiving party.

F. Severability. If a court with jurisdiction rules that any nonmaterial part of this Agreement is invalid, unenforceable, or contrary to law or public policy, then the rest of this Agreement remains valid and fully enforceable.

G. Counterparts. The parties may sign this Agreement in counterparts, each of which is considered an original, but all of which constitute the same Agreement. Facsimiles, pdfs, and photocopies of signature pages of the Agreement have the same binding effect as originals.

H. Time of Essence. Time is of the essence in performing this Agreement.

Page 10 of 18 ends

I. Compliance with all Laws, Requirements, and Orders. The Subrecipient shall comply with all applicable laws, regulations, orders of public officials, and requirements in connection with this Agreement, including all non-discrimination and equal opportunity laws to ensure that Subrecipient does not deny benefits or services or otherwise discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin (including limited English proficiency), disability, age, or sex (including sexual orientation and gender identity), in accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Public Law 88-352, title 42 of the U.S. Code, sections 2000d et seq., and the Department's implementing regulations, title 31, CFR, part 22; Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Section 504), Public Law 93-112, as amended by Public Law 93-516, title 29 of the U.S. Code, section 794; Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (Title IX), title 20 of the U.S. Code, sections 1681 et seq., and the Department's implementing regulations, title 31, CFR, part 28; Age Discrimination Act of 1975, Public Law 94-135, title 42 of the U.S. Code, sections 6101 et seq., and the Department implementing regulations at title 31, CFR, part 23 and title 28, CFR, part 42. As a condition of receiving ARPA funds, the Subrecipient further provides the assurances set forth in Attachment “C” to this Agreement.

J. Authority to Sign. The persons signing this Agreement on Subrecipient's behalf represents that he or she is authorized to do so and that no further action beyond his or her signature is required to bind Subrecipient to this Agreement. City shall have no obligations whatsoever under this Agreement, unless and until this Agreement is executed by the City Manager or the City Manager's authorized designee.

K. Tax Implications and Consequences. The City makes no representations as to the tax consequences associated with the disbursement of ARPA funds related to this agreement, and any determination related to this issue is the sole responsibility of the Subrecipient. Subrecipient acknowledges consulting with its own tax advisors or tax attorneys regarding this transaction or having had an opportunity to do so prior to signing this Agreement. Subrecipient acknowledges the City cannot provide advice regarding the tax consequences or implications of the ARPA funds disbursed to Subrecipient under the terms of this Agreement.

L. Integration and Modification. This Agreement sets forth the parties’ entire understanding regarding the matters addressed above and is intended to be their final, complete, and exclusive expression of those matters. It supersedes all prior or contemporaneous Agreements, representations, and negotiations ̶ written, oral, expressed, or implied ̶ and may be modified only by another written Agreement signed by both parties.

[signature page follows]

Page 11 of 18 ends

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement in duplicate on the day and year first above written.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, A Municipal
Corporation of the State of California

Rod B. Butler
City Manager

ATTEST:

_____________________________’
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney

Page 12 of 18 ends

SANTA ANA RIVER WATER COMPANY

General Manager

ATTEST:

_____________________________’

District Secretary

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

General Counsel

Page 13 of 18 ends

ATTACHMENT “A”

APPROVED ACTIVITIES

 SARWC acting as a Subrecipient of ARPA funds awarded to the City of Jurupa Valley will distribute a rebate to their customers.
 As of the drafting of this agreement SARWC had a total of 1911customers .  SARWC will provide a rebate to each customer in the amount of $35.00 For a total dollar amount of $ 67,655

Administrative Expenses

 No Administrative costs are anticipated
 The amount of ARPA funds to be processed by SARWC for Utility Rate Payback Program Administration shall not exceed providing Sixty-seven thousand six hundred and fifty-five dollars ($67,655).

Page 14 of 18 ends

ATTACHMENT “B”

APPROVED BUDGET

Utility Account Credits:
 The amount of ARPA funds to be processed by SARWC for Utility Rate Payback Program Administration shall not exceed providing Sixty-five thousand six hundred and fifty-five dollars ($67,655).

Administrative Expenses :

 No Administrative costs are anticipated .

Page 15 of 18 ends

ATTACHMENT “C”

ASSURANCES OF COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL RIGHTS REQUIREMENTS

As a condition of receipt of federal financial assistance from the Department of the Treasury, the Subrecipient provides the assurances stated in this Attachment “C”. The Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987 provides that the provisions of the assurances apply to all of the operations of the Subrecipient's programs funded under this Agreement.

1. Subrecipient ensures its current and future compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, which prohibits exclusion from participation, denial of the benefits of, or subjection to discrimination under programs and activities receiving federal financial assistance, of any person in the United States on the ground of race, color, or national origin (42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq.), as implemented by the Department of the Treasury Title VI regulations at title 31, CFR, Part 22 and other pertinent executive orde rs such as Executive Order 13166, directives, circulars, policies, memoranda, and/or guidance documents.

2. The Subrecipient shall comply with all provisions of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965 and of the rules, regulations, and relevant orders of Secretary of Labor, as applicable. The Subrecipient will furnish all information and reports required by Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and by the rules, regulations, and orders of the Secretary of Labor, or pursuant thereto, and will permit access to his books, records, and accounts by the City and the Secretary of Labor for purposes of investigation to ascertain compliance with such rules, regulations and orders. The Subrecipient shall include the provisions of this section in every sub -agreement or purchase order unless exempted by rules, regulations, or orders of the Secretary of Labor issued pursuant to Section 204 of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, so that such provisions will be binding upon each sub-agreement or vendor.

3. During the performance of this agreement, the Subrecipient shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of age, race, creed, sex, color, or national origin. The Subrecipient will, in all solicitation of advertisements fo r employees placed by or on behalf of the Subrecipient, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to age, race, creed, color, sex, or national origin. The Subrecipient shall take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their age, race, creed, sex, color, or national origin. Such action shall include, without limitation, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer; rates of pay of other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The Subrecipient agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, n otices setting forth the provisions of this non-discrimination clause.

Page 16 of 18 ends

4. Subrecipient acknowledges that Executive Order 13166, "Improving Access to Services for Persons with Limited English Proficiency," seeks to improve access to federally assisted programs and activities for individuals who, because of national origin, have Limited English proficiency (LEP). The Subrecipient understands that denying a person access to its programs, services, and activities because of LEP is a form of national origin discri mination prohibited under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Department of the Treasury's implementing regulations. Accordingly, the Subrecipient shall initiate reasonable steps, or comply with the Department of the Treasury's directives, to ensure that LEP persons have meaningful access to its programs, services, and activities. Subrecipient understands and agrees that meaningful access may entail providing language assistance services, including oral interpretation and written translation wh ere necessary, to ensure effective communication in the Subrecipient's programs, services, and activities.

5. Subrecipient agrees to consider the need for language services for LEP persons when Subrecipient develops applicable budgets and conducts programs, services, and activities. As a resource, the Department of the Treasury has published its LEP guidance at 70 FR 6067. For more information on taking reasonable steps to provide meaningful access for LEP persons, please visit http://www.lep.gov.

6. Subrecipient acknowledges and agrees that compliance with the assurances constitutes a condition of continued receipt of federal financial assistance and is binding upon Subrecipient and Subrecipient's successors, transferees, and assignees for the term of this agreement.

7. Subrecipient acknowledges and agrees that it must require any sub -Subrecipients, contractors, subcontractors, successors, transferees, and assignees to comply with assurances 1 -6 above, and agrees to incorporate the following language in every contract or agreement subject to Title VI and its regulations between the Subrecipient and the Subrecipient's sub-Subrecipients, contractors, subcontractors, successors, transferees, and assignees:

The sub-Subrecipient, contractor, subcontractor, successor, transferee, and assignee shall comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits recipients of federal financial assistance from excluding from a program or activity, denying benefits of, or otherwise discriminating against a person on the basis of race, color, or national origin (42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq.), as implemented by the Department of the Treasury's Title VI regulations, 31 CFR Part 22, which are herein incorporated by reference and made a part of this contract (or agreement). Title VI also includes protection to persons with "Limited English Proficiency" in any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance, 42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq., as implemented by the Department of the Treasury's Title VI regulations, 31 CFR Part 22, and herein incorporated by reference and made a part of this contract or agreement.

8. Subrecipient understands and agrees that if any real property or structure is provided or improved with the aid of federal financial assistance by the Department of the Treasury, this assurance obligates the Subrecipient , or in the case of a subseque nt transfer, the transferee, for the period during which the real property or structure is used for a purpose for which the

Page 17 of 18 ends

federal financial assistance is extended or for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits. If any pers onal property is provided, this assurance obligates the Subrecipient for the period during which it retains ownership or possession of the property.

9. Subrecipient shall cooperate in any enforcement or compliance review activities by the Department of the Treasury. Enforcement may include investigation, arbitration, mediation, litigation, and monitoring of any settlement agreements that may result from these actions. The Subrecipient shall comply with information requests, on -site compliance reviews and reporting requirements.

10. Subrecipient shall maintain a complaint log and inform the City of any complaints of discrimination on the grounds of race, color, or national origin, and limited English proficiency covered by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and implementing regulations and provide, upon request, a list of all such reviews or proceedings based on the complaint, pending or completed, including outcome. Subrecipient also must inform the City if Subrecipient has received no complaints under Title VI.

11. In its monthly reporting, Subrecipient must provide documentation of any determination by an administrative agency or court finding non-compliance with Title VI and Subrecipient's efforts to address the non-compliance, including any voluntary compliance or other agreements between the Subrecipient and the administrative agency that made the finding. If the Subrecipient settles a case or matter alleging such discrimination, the Subrecipient must provide documentation of the settlement to the City. In the absence of such disclosures, Subrecipient is certifying that it has not been the subject of any court or administrative agency finding of discrimination.

12. If the Subrecipient makes sub-awards to other agencies or other entities, the Subrecipient is responsible for ensuring that sub-Subrecipients also comply with Title VI and other applicable authorities covered in this agreement. State agencies that make sub-awards must have in place standard grant assurances and review procedures to demonstrate that that they are effectively monitoring the civil rights compliance of sub-Subrecipients.

13. The United States of America has the right to seek judicial enforcement of the terms of this Attachment “C”, and nothing in this Agreement alters or limits the federal enforcement measures that the United States may take in order to address violations of this agreement or applicable federal law.

Page 18 of 18 ends

ATTACHMENT “D”

SUBRECIPIENT (SUBRECIPIENT) SUBAWARD INFORMATION

1 Subrecipient Name (which must match registered name
in DUNS):

2 Subrecipient’s unique entity identifier:

3 TIN (Tax Identification No)

4 Legal Business Name

5 Address of Business
6 Point of Contact Email

7 Is your business/agency registered in SAM.gov
8 In the prior fiscal year did your company receive 80% or more of its annual gross revenue from Federal
Funds?

9 In the prior fiscal year did your company receive $25 Million or more of its annual gross revenue from
federal funds?

10 If YES to 8 or 9 above. Is the total compensation for the organizations five highest paid officers publicly
listed or otherwise listed in SAM.gov?

11 If YES to 8 or 9 and NO to 10 please list your 5 highest paid officers, if less than 5 please disregard.

a.
b.
c.
d.
e

Page | 1
S

TAFF REPORT
D
ATE: MARCH 21, 2024
TO
: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
F
ROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: JOE PEREZ, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER / COMMUNITY

DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
S
UBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.I
CI
TY COUNCIL REVIEW OF THE 202 3 GENERAL PLAN ANNUAL

PROGRESS REPORT

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council review the attached 2023 General Plan Annual Progress Report and provide direction to submit the report to the California Office of Planning and Research (OPR) and the Housing and Community Development Department (HCD).

BACKGROUND
The City of Jurupa Valley General Plan is a long-range comprehensive plan that provides policy direction and guides land use and development in the City. The individual elements (land use; mobility; housing; conservation and open space; noise; community safety , services, and facilities; air quality; environmental justice; healthy communities ; and economic sustainability) of the General Plan contain goals, policies and programs that outline how the City wants to grow and develop over the next 10 to 20 years.

Government Code Section 65400 et. seq. mandates that all cities and counties submit to their legislative bodies for review and approval an annual report on the status of the General Plan and progress in its implementation and forward the report to the State of California Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) and Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) each year.

The attached General Plan Annual Progress Report satisfies the Government Code requirement and will be submitted to the State.

RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2

Annual Progress Report
The Annual Progress Report serves the following purposes for OPR:
• Identifies Statewide trends in land use decision-making and determines how local planning and development activities relate to Statewide planning goals and policies; and
• Tracks progress on a local jurisdiction’ s comprehensive General Plan using information provided in the Annual progress Report.

The City of Jurupa Valley’s 2023 General Plan Annual Progress Report was prepared by the Community Development Department with assistance from the Building and Safety Departments. It summarizes the City of Jurupa Valley ’s progress towards implementing the goals, policies and programs of the General Plan.

General Plan Program Implementation Matrix
A General Plan Program Implementation Matrix was prepared to ensure the overall direction provided in the General Plan , for City growth and development , is translated from general terms to specific actions. Each implementation program is a procedure, program or technique that requires City action, whether alone or in collaboration with third-party organizations or State and federal agencies. Each Implementation Program includes a specific reference to an individual General Plan Element. Some General Plan implementation programs are processes or procedures the City of Jurupa Valley administers on a day -to-day basis; others identify new programs or projects for implementation. The implementation programs are organized according to each of the General Plan’ s ten elements. The General Plan Program Implementation Matrix is an attachment to the 2023 Annual Progress Report.

The Program Implementation Matrix for this Annual Progress Report identifies all implementation measures as completed/ ongoing, in process, or requiring future action.

At this time, the City is reporting that some programs have been completed while others are pending completion or will begin in the future.

Summary of General Plan Progress - 2023
In addition to the detailed General Plan Program Implementation Matrix, the following paragraphs provide a summary of major City and planning activities as well as development applications underway or completed in 2023. These and all the items listed in the General Plan Program Implementation Matrix contribute toward the implementation of the Jurupa Valley General Plan.

1. Housing Production. During 2023, the City issued a total of 128 building permits for new housing units and 16 0 Certificates of Occupancy. When the Building and Safety Division issues a Certificate of Occupancy, it means the housing unit passed final inspection and has been deemed ready to be occupied by or house residents (also referred to as “finaled”).

Out of the total building permits , 42 received Certificates of Occupancy for accessory dwelling units (ADUs) . SCAG has published ADU affordability Page | 3

assumptions for the region, thus 24 of the ADUs are counted as affordable to lower- income households and 14 for moderate-income households.

The building permits finaled for all housing units (including ADUs) will contribute to the fulfilment of the City’s Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) and housing production goals.

2. Manufactured Housing Opportunity and Revitalization (MORE) Program . In December 2023, the City was awarded $3 million through the MORE Program to assist an estimated 168 households with the rehabilitation of their manufactured homes. Low-income mobilehome residents with the most need will be prioritized.

3. Regional Early Action Planning (REAP) 2.0 Grant. The City was notified by SCAG that it would receive $478,894 of REAP 2.0 funds for implementation of the Pedley Town Center Plan, to include the development of mixed- use zoning in the Plan area, accelerating infill, mixed- use, affordable and/or commercial development near a Metrolink station, reducing vehicle miles traveled. SCAG staff and representatives from Jurupa Valley were refining the scope of work when SCAG announced that the program would be paused due to State budgetary concerns.

Public engagement was conducted, and the Plan was finalized in 2023. It will guide development and public improvements to create a cohesive center that will anchor this historic area of the city and help solidify its identity within Jurupa Valley. Public hearings to adopt the Plan are anticipated to be held in the first or second quarter of 2024.

5. H
ousing Element Zoning Code Amendments. In May 2023, the City amended the Zoning Code to address changes in State law. New sections in the code address single-room occupancy dwellings, emergency shelter, employee housing, farmworker housing, group homes, low barrier navigation centers, residential care facilities, supportive housing and transitional housing.

6. Low
Barrier Navigation Center (LBNC) Code Update. Assembly Bill 101 (AB101) was enacted in 2019 and requires that cities allow “Low Barrier Navigation Centers” (LBNCs) by right in mixed -use zones and non- residential zones permitting multi -family uses if specific requirements are met. LBNCs include housing and shelters where a resident at -risk for homelessness can live temporarily and receive services while waiting to move into permanent housing. A study session is scheduled in April 2024, to provide the City Council with an overview of the state law, potential sites, and a preliminary analysis. Completion is expected by July 2024.

7. H
omelessness Prevention/Outreach/Mitigation. T he City is a member of the Santa Ana River Bottom (SARB) multidisciplinary team founded in 2021 and consists of several Riverside County departments, Riverside University Health System - Behavioral Health, Regional Park and Open -Space District, five cities, and local homeless service providers who meet regularly to coordinate responses to Page | 4

rehouse existing encampment residents living in the S ARB area, remove and mitigate physical encampments, and conduct clean-up, maintenance, repairs, and habitat restoration. In November 2022, the Riverside County Board of Supervisors accepted a $10,997,001 state grant for Encampment Resolution Funding for fiscal years 22/23 and 23/24 and awarded funding to Jurupa Valley in the amount of $485,982. These funds are used to continue to address the current urgent need of people experiencing homelessness around and in the SARB in Jurupa Valley. The City partners with Path of Life Ministries (POLM) to provide outreach services including a team of 2 outreach workers to focus heavily on the SARB and surrounding areas. The funding support s homeless individuals and families with move-in resources and short-term rental assistance. As part of the SARB initiative, POLM connects and collaborates with partner organizations and agencies such as the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department Homeless Outreach Team, Jurupa Valley Code Enforcement D ivision and other community-based agencies to coordinate efforts to provide effective homeless solutions in Jurupa Valley . In December 2023, through the SARB initiative, Riverside County incorporated Rapid Rehousing, which provides Jurupa Valley residents with access to housing providers and case management for 12-24 months for stabilization.

In addition, since 2018, the City has contracted with POLM to provide short -term assistance (outreach services and shelter) to persons on the verge of homelessness. POLM provides outreach services that engage homeless individuals in Jurupa Valley in an effort to mitigate homelessness. The group also operates a corporate campus in the City of Riverside that provides an array of homelessness mitigation services. As part of the agreement with POLM, four beds are provided on a nightly basis for homeless persons from Jurupa Valley. For fiscal year 2023/2024, the City allocated Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds t o POLM to administer its programs. In September 2022, the City also allocated $200,000 in American Rescue Plan Act funds to POLM to provide two crisis stabilization apartments for previously unhoused individuals for an additional two years.

8. Housing Rehabilitation Grants . In 202 3, the City continued to administer its Housing Rehabilitation program with money obtained through the federal CDBG program and approved 13 rehabilitation grants, including two for mobile homes.

The Housing Rehabilitation program provides assistance (up to $10,000 in individual grants) to very low-, low- and moderate-income persons (as defined by Federal guidelines) to complete necessary repairs and property improvements.

The direct benefits to participating homeowners are the improved condition and safety (homes meeting current standards) of their homes. More broadly, the program provides community -wide benefit because it addresses blight and enhances the quality of the housing stock. G rants are provided to individual homeowners on a first-come, first-served basis every year.

Page | 5

Housing Element Reporting Requirements
HCD certified Jurupa Valley’s 6th Cycle (2021-2029) Housing Element on April 22, 2022.

The Housing Element included a program to redesignate and rezone an additional 19 sites to Highest Density Residential (HHDR) to accommodate its share of the regional housing need, which has been set at 4,497 units for the 8- year planning period. Those sites are scheduled to be considered by the Planning Commission and City Council in March and April 2024. In addition to the information provided above, jurisdictions are required to report certain housing information to OPR and HCD as part of the G eneral Plan Annual Progress R eport. Attachment A to the 202 3 Annual Progress Report and Attachment B (APR Excel forms), include data on Housing Element Program implementation and the number of residential units processed and approved in the City.

The APR keeps track of the jurisdiction’ s progress in meeting its State housing requirements. Other than ADUs and deed-restricted affordable housing, the City does not track affordability. Therefore, all other units have been identified as “ Above Moderate” although some of the units likely fall into the lower income levels.

SUMMARY
The City has made progress in a number of areas as previously addressed. The 6 th Cycle
(2021-2029) Housing Element, approved in April 2022, requires the City to accommodate an additional 4,497 units for the 8- year period, representing a significant increase from the previous cycle. The Housing Element (and attached progress report, Attachment B, Table C) identifies sites the City committed to rezone to accommodate the shortfall in allocated housing need; those sites will be considered by the Planning Commission and City Council in March and April of 2024. The Community Development Department is diligently working on a variety of programs and plans, described in the Housing Element, which will assist the C ity in making progress toward the City ’s allocation of the regional housing need.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
The cost associated with preparing the 2023 General Plan Annual Progress Report is provided from the General Fund.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Recommended Action: That the City Council review the attached 2023 General Plan Annual Progress Report and provide direction to submit the report to the California Office of Planning and Research (OPR) and the Housing and Community Development Department (HCD).

2. As an alternative, the City Council could request changes and revisions to the report and direct staff to amend the report prior to its submission.

City of Jurupa Valley
2023 General Plan Annual Progress Report

Submitted to:

The State of California
Office of Planning & Research
and
Department of
Housing & Community Development

Submitted by:

The City of Jurupa Valley
8930 Limonite Avenue
Jurupa Valley, CA 92509
(954) 332-6464
Contact:

Joe Perez
Assistant City Manager /
Community Development Director

April 1, 2024

Jurupa Valley General Plan – 2023 Annual Progress Report 2 | Page

Table of Contents Page

1. Introduction 3

2. 2023 Annual Progress Report Acceptance Date 3

3. Jurupa Valley General Plan Process and Adoption 3

4. General Plan Implementation Progress 4
a. General Plan Program Implementation Matrix 4
b. Summary of Planning Activities and Major Development Applications in 2023 4 c. Housing Element Reporting Requirements 6

ATTACHMENTS
A. 2023 Jurupa Valley General Plan Program Implementation Matrix B. 2023 Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Implementation Matrix C. Excel APR Forms

Jurupa Valley General Plan – 2023 Annual Progress Report 3 | Page

1. INTRODUCTION

The City of Jurupa Valley General Plan is a long-range comprehensive plan that provides policy direction and guides land use and development in the City. The individual elements (land use; mobility; housing; conservation and open space; air quality; noise; community safety, services and facilities; environmental justice; healthy communities; and economic sustainability) of the General Plan contain goals, policies and programs that outline how the City wants to grow and develop over the next 10-20 years.

Government Code Section 65400 et seq. mandates that all cities and counties submit to their legislative bodies for review and approval an annual report on the status of the general plan and progress in its implementation and forward the report to the State of California Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) and Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) for review. This document satisfies the Government Code requirement.

The Annual Progress Report provides OPR an opportunity to identify Statewide trends in land use decision-making and determine how local planning and development activities relate to Statewide planning goals and policies. Also, OPR can track progress on a local jurisdiction’s comprehensive General Plan using information provided in the Annual Progress Report.

The City of Jurupa Valley’s 2023 General Plan Annual Progress Report was prepared by the Community Development Department . The General Plan Annual Progress Report summarizes the City of Jurupa Valley’s progress towards implementing the goals, policies and programs of the General Plan. The report is intended to provide information on the measurable outcomes and actions associated with the implementation of all of the General Plan elements.

2. 2023 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT ACCEPTANCE DATE

This Annual Progress Report was presented to, and accepted by, the Jurupa Valley City Council at its regular meeting on March 21, 2024.

3. JURUPA VALLEY GENERAL PLAN PROCESS AND ADOPTION

The Jurupa Valley General Plan is the first General Plan for the City of Jurupa Valley. The General Plan was adopted as a replacement for the County of Riverside General Plan for the City of Jurupa Valley , which was adopted at the time of City incorporation in 2011.

The City worked closely with OPR in developing the plan and it was adopted on September 7, 2017.

By working closely with OPR during the plan’s development, the City ensured that the General Plan complies with all aspects of OPR’s General Plan Guidelines, including the preparation and adoption of an award -winning Environmental Justice Element, only the second Environmental Justice Element in the State. The Jurupa Valley General Plan Jurupa Valley General Plan – 2023 Annual Progress Report 4 | Page

contains all State- required element topics (Land Use; Housing; Mobility ; Noise; Community Safety Services and Facilities; Conservation and Open Space; Environmental Justice) as well as four additional and separate elements ( Air Quality ; Economic Sustainability; and Healthy Communities).

The General Plan set s forth the City’s goals, policies and programs (implementation actions) for each element. T here were no major amendments or updates to the plan in 2023. The City of Jurupa Valley intends to review the General Plan annually to determine if amendments are necessary. If the City Council determines changes have occurred that merit General Plan amendments, the City will update the General Plan to reflect new conditions and information. In addition, the City will consider developer -requested General Plan amendment proposals on a case-by-case basis.

4. GENERAL PLAN IMPLEMENTATION PROGRESS

General Plan Program Implementation Matrix
A General Plan Program Implementation Matrix was prepared to ensure the overall direction provided in the General Plan, for City growth and development, is translated from general terms to specific actions. Each implementation program is a procedure, program or technique that requires City action, whether alone or in collaboration with third-party organizations or State and federal agencies. Each Implementation Program includes a specific reference to an individual General Plan Element. Some General Plan implementation programs are processes or procedures the City of Jurupa Valley administers on a day -to-day basis; others identify new programs or projects for implementation. The implementation programs are organized according to each of the General Plan’s ten elements. The General Plan Program Implementation Matrix is an attachment to the 2023 Annual Progress Report.

The Program Implementation Matrix for this Annual Progress Report identifies all implementation measures as complete/ongoing, in process or future work effort . At this time, the City is reporting that some programs have been completed while others are pending completion or will begin in the future.

Summary of General Plan Progress-2023
In addition to the detailed General Plan Program Implementation Matrix, the following paragraphs provide a summary of major City and planning activities as well as development applications underway or completed in 2023. These and all the items listed in the General Plan Program Implementation Matrix contribute toward the implementation of the Jurupa Valley General Plan.

1. Housing Production. During 2023, the City issued 128 building permits for new housing units and 160 Certificates of Occupancy. When the Building and Safety Division issues a Certificate of Occupancy, it means the housing unit passed final inspection and has been deemed ready to be occupied by or house residents (also referred to as “finaled”).

Out of the total building permits, 42 were finaled for accessory dwelling units (ADUs).

SCAG has published ADU affordability assumptions for the region, thus 24 of the Jurupa Valley General Plan – 2023 Annual Progress Report 5 | Page

ADUs are counted as affordable to lower -income households and for moderate- income households.

The building permits “finaled” for all housing units (including ADUs) will contribute to the fulfilment of the City’s Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) and housing production goals.

2. Manufactured Housing Opportunity and Revitalization (MORE) Program. In December 2023, the City was awarded $3 million through the MORE Program to assist an estimated 168 households with the rehabilitation of their manufactured homes. Low-income mobilehome residents with the most need will be prioritized.

3. Regional Early Action Planning (REAP) 2.0 Grant. The City was notified by SCAG that it would receive $ 478,894 of REAP 2.0 funds for implementation of the Pedley Town Center Plan, to include the development of mixed-use zoning in the Plan area, accelerating infill, mixed -use, affordable and/or commercial development near a Metrolink station, reducing vehicle miles traveled. SCAG staff and representatives from Jurupa Valley were refining the scope of work when SCAG announced that the program would be paused due to State budgetary concerns.

4. P edley Town Center Plan. In August 2022, the City launched a planning effort to create a long- term vision for the Pedley area, and provide policy direction and guidance to residents, City staff, decision-makers, and the broader community. Public engagement was conducted, and the Plan was finalized in 2023. It will guide development and public improvements to create a cohesive center that will anchor this historic area of the city and help solidify its identity within Jurupa Valley. Public hearings to adopt the Plan are anticipated to be held in the first or second quarter of 2024.

5. H ousing Element Zoning Code Amendments. In May 2023, the City amended the Zoning Code to address changes in State law. New sections in the code address single-room occupancy dwellings, emergency shelter, employee housing, farmworker housing, group homes, low barrier navigation centers, residential care facilities, supportive housing and transitional housing.

6. Low B arrier Navigation Center (LBNC) Code Update. Assembly Bill 101 (AB101) was enacted in 2019 and requires that cities allow “Low Barrier Navigation Centers” (LBNCs) by-right in mixed-use zones and non-residential zones permitting multi-family uses if specific requirements are met. LBNCs include housing and shelters where a resident at -risk for homelessness can live temporarily and receive services while waiting to move into permanent housing. A study session is scheduled in April 2024, to provide the City Council with an overview of the state law, potential sites, and a preliminary analysis. Completion is expected by July 2024.

7. H
omelessness Prevention/Outreach/Mitigation. The City is a member of the Santa Ana River Bottom (SARB) multidisciplinary team founded in 2021 and consists of several Riverside County departments, Riverside University Health System - Behavioral Health, Regional Park and Open- Space District, five cities, and local Jurupa Valley General Plan – 2023 Annual Progress Report 6 | Page

homeless service providers who meet regularly to coordinate responses to rehouse existing encampment residents living in the SARB area, remove and mitigate physical encampments, and conduct clean- up, maintenance, repairs, and habitat restoration.

In November 2022, the Riverside County Board of Supervisors accepted a $10,997,001 state grant for Encampment Resolution Funding for fiscal years 22/23 and 23/24 and awarded funding to Jurupa Valley in the amount of $485,982. These funds are used to continue to address the current urgent need of people experiencing homelessness around and in the SARB in Jurupa Valley. The City partners with Path of Life Ministries (POLM) to provide outreach services including a team of 2 outreach workers to focus heavily on the SARB and surrounding areas. The funding supports homeless individuals and families with move- in resources and short -term rental assistance. As part of the SARB initiative, POLM connects and collaborates with partner organizations and agencies such as the River side County Sheriff’s Department Homeless Outreach Team, Jurupa Valley Code Enforcement Division and other community -based agencies to coordinate efforts to provide effective homeless solutions in Jurupa Valley. In December 2023, through the SARB initiative, Riverside County incorporated Rapid- Rehousing, which provides Jurupa Valley residents with access to housing providers and case management for 12- 24 months for stabilization.

In addition, since 2018, the City has contracted with POLM to provide short -term assistance (outreach services and shelter) to persons on the verge of homelessness.

POLM provides outreach services that engage homeless individuals in Jurupa Valley in an effort to mitigate homelessness. The group also operates a corporate campus in the City of Riverside that provides an array of homelessness mitigation services. As part of the agreement with POLM, four beds are provided on a nightly basis for homeless persons from Jurupa Valley. For fiscal year 2023/2024, the City allocated Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds to POLM to administer its programs. In September 2022, the City also allocated $200,000 in American Rescue Plan Act funds to POLM to provide two crisis stabilization apartments for previously unhoused individuals for an additional two years.

8. Housing Rehabilitation Grants. In 2023, the City continued to administer its Housing Rehabilitation program with money obtained through the federal Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program and approved 13 rehabilitation grants, including two for mobile homes. The Housing Rehabilitation program provides assistance (up to $10,000 in individual grants) to very low-, low- and moderate-income persons (as defined by Federal guidelines) to complete necessary repairs and property improvements. The direct benefits to participating homeowners are the improved condition and safety (homes meeting current standards) of their homes.

More broadly, the program provides community -wide benefit because it addresses blight and enhances the quality of the housing stock. Grants are provided to individual homeowners on a first-come, first-served basis every year.

Jurupa Valley General Plan – 2023 Annual Progress Report 7 | Page

Housing Element Reporting Requirements
HCD certified Jurupa Valley’s 6 th Cycle (2021-2029) Housing Element on April 22, 2022. The Housing Element includes a program to redesignate and rezone an additional 19 sites to accommodate its allocation of the regional housing need, which has been set at 4,497 units for the 8 -year planning period. Those sites will be considered by the Planning Commission and City Council in March and April of 2024.

In addition to the information provided above, jurisdictions are required to report certain housing information to OPR and HCD as part of the General Plan Annual Progress Report. Attachment s A and B to the 2023 Annual Progress Report and Attachment C (APR Excel forms), include data on Housing Element Program implementation and the number of residential units processed and approved in the City. The APR keeps track of the jurisdiction’s progress in meeting its State housing requirements. Other than ADUs and deed-restricted affordable housing: the City does not track affordability. Therefore, all other units have been identified as “Above Moderate” although some of the units likely fall into the lower income levels.

ATTACHMENTS

A. 2 023 Jurupa Valley General Plan Program Implementation Matrix B. 2023 Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Implementation Matrix C. Excel APR Forms
Attachment A
GENERAL PLAN PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION STATUS CY 2023

Page 1 of 34 ends

Program Description Implementation Status
Future Work
Effort In Process Ongoing or
Complete
Land Use Element
LUE 1.1.1
Parkland Requirements. In coordination with community service districts, schools, residents, and the development community, consider amending the City’s parkland requirements, including park area dedication and in -lieu fee requirements, to help address underserved parkland needs.
x
LUE 1.1.2 Incentives. Provide programs and incentives that encourage Open Space -Rural areas to be maintained in a manner that enhances their existing and desired visual character. x LUE 1.1.3
Mineral Extraction Controls . Establish a zoning overlay zone to designate open space areas in the OS -RUR designation that are appropriate for mineral extraction such that scenic resources such as prominent ridgelines, rivers, and forests are not adversely affected.
x
LUE 2.1.1
Regional Housing Needs. Within 1 year of adoption of the 2017 General Plan, amend the General Plan Land Use Map and Zoning Ordinance density standards for the R -3 zone to allow a base density up to 25 dwelling units per acre, and amend the Zoning Map to show the locations of at least 34 acres of additional R -6 zoning to help meet Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA).

x
LUE 3.1.1
Broaden and Refine Commercial Zones. During the next 3 years, amend the Zoning Ordinance to allow office parks, large-scale shopping centers, specialized commercial such as medical clusters, tourist commercial, and entertainment complexes. x
LUE 3.1.2
Maintenance. Adopt guidelines, an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance, or other measure(s) to clearly outline the City’s expectations and requirements for the maintenance and repair of commercial buildings, landscaping, signs and fencing. x
LUE 5.1.1 Zoning Update. Update the Zoning Ordinance to protect and encourage equestrian uses and facilities within the ELPO and to remove obstacles and disincentives. x LUE 5.1.2 Density Transfer. Consider adopting a density transfer program to provide incentives for open space preservation and equestrian uses. x

Attachment A
GENERAL PLAN PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION STATUS CY 2023

Page 2 of 34 ends

Program Description Implementation Status
Future Work
Effort In Process Ongoing or
Complete
LUE 5.1.3
Public Awareness. Work with community service districts, equestrian groups, and non - profit agencies to improve public awareness of equestrian uses, rules, responsibilities, routes, and activities and to help improve public safety, enjoyment, and sense of community.
x
LUE 5.1.4
Funding. Consider an assessment district, joint -powers agreement with the Jurupa Area Recreation and Park District (JARPD) or the County, or other funding mechanism for the acquisition of rights of way and the construction and maintenance of multi-purpose trails within the Overlay Area.
x
LUE 5.1.5
Acquire Easements. Work with other agencies, utility providers and private landowners to acquire access easements for equestrian trail use where appropriate, such as along utility easements or along flood control channels.
x
LUE 5.1.6
Hitching Posts. Require that within the Overlay, new development shall install hitching posts and related facilities to allow safe short-term equestrian “parking” and to create a design statement that the area encourages equestrian uses. x
LUE 5.1.7
Town Center Area Plans. The City will prepare an area plan for each of its three town centers to establish a consensus and a vision that is shared by the stakeholders and the City Council. The master plans will be prepared in the following order of priority:

1. Pedley Town Center

2. Glen Avon Town Center

3. Rubidoux Town Center
X
(Pedley Only)

LUE 5.1.8
Town Center Standards. The City will prepare Town Center Standards and update the Zoning Ordinance to include them and to integrate the Rubidoux Design Standards with the new standards.
x
LUE 5.1.9
Density Transfer . Consider establishing a Zoning Ordinance provision to allow the transfer of development credits – i.e., residential density – from environmentally sensitive sites to Town Center sites, where appropriate.

x
Attachment A
GENERAL PLAN PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION STATUS CY 2023

Page 3 of 34 ends

Program Description Implementation Status
Future Work
Effort In Process Ongoing or
Complete
LUE 5.1.10
Zoning Ordinance Update. Update the Zoning Ordinance, the Zoning Map, and specific Plans to ensure consistency with the Mixed Use Overlay and to establish flexible development standards.
x
LUE 5.1.11
Historic Resource Criteria. Prepare eligibility criteria and procedures for the designation of potential historic resources (e.g., Galleano Winery; Jensen-Alvarado Ranch) and potential historic districts (e.g., Downtown Rubidoux). x
LUE 5.1.12 Historic Survey. Conduct a historic and cultural resources survey to identify historic buildings, sites, and other important cultural landmarks to be preserved. x LUE 5.1.13
Zoning Ordinance Amendment. Amend the Zoning Ordinance to require an assessment of potential impacts to on -site and nearby historic resources as part of planning applications for general plan amendments, rezoning, and conditional use permits. x
LUE 5.1.14 Demolition. Amend the Zoning Regulations to include Historic Resource demolition procedures. x
LUE 7.1.1
Land Use Intensification. Amend Section 9.10.050(D) of the Zoning Ordinance to require that applications to change the General Plan Land use designation to intensify land use on properties within a 100-year floodplain or on slopes of 4:1 or greater require initiation of a General Plan amendment by the City Council.
x
LUE 10.1.1
Distinctive Communities Map. Prepare a Distinctive Communities Map that reflects the intent of the General Plan and its residents that the unique qualities and characteristics of each of the City’s distinctive communities will be maintained and not be absorbed into continuous suburban development. The map should be a “bubble” diagram rather than attempting to delineate precise community boundaries. Topographic features such as hills, watercourses, floodplains, and manmade features, such as streets and landmarks, should constitute the community definers or approximate boundaries. x
LUE 10.1.2 Cultural Arts. Explore the establishment of a non -profit foundation and funding mechanism to promote and finance public art in the City. x

Attachment A
GENERAL PLAN PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION STATUS CY 2023

Page 4 of 34 ends

Program Description Implementation Status
Future Work
Effort In Process Ongoing or
Complete
LUE 11.1.1
Architectural Guidelines. Within 18 months of adopting the 2017 General Plan, adopt Architectural Guidelines addressing site planning, building and landscape design, and signage. The Guidelines shall update and, where appropriate, merge and integrate community design standards developed by the County of Riverside and applied to various areas within Jurupa Valley.
x
LUE 11.1.2
Landmark and Historic Trees. Within 18 months following adoption of the 2017 General Plan, the City Council shall consider an ordinance to maintain and protect landmark and historic trees throughout the City.
x

MOBILITY ELEMENT
ME 1.1.1
Mobility Corridor Master Plan. Consider establishing a Mobility Corridor Master Plan and Design Guidelines to provide more detailed guidance on the design, operational and maintenance of mobility corridors.

ME 2.1.1
Mitigation Measures. As necessary to mitigate potential impacts, the City will implement improvements identified as mitigation measures in the Final Environmental Impact Report for the 2017 General Plan.

ME 2.1.2
School Planning. Provide assistance to school districts in facility planning and transportation operations to ensure safety for users of all modes during school pick-up, drop-off and other special events.

x
ME 2.1.3
Sidewalks. Prepare and maintain an inventory of sidewalk facilities to determine where pedestrian improvements are most needed to provide a continuous safe route for pedestrians.

ME 2.1.4
Barrier-free Access. Retrofit streets and require developments to install public improvements that provide disabled access and mobility on public streets, as required by state or federal law.

Attachment A
GENERAL PLAN PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION STATUS CY 2023

Page 5 of 34 ends

Program Description Implementation Status
Future Work
Effort In Process Ongoing or
Complete
ME 2.1.5
Master Plan of Streets and Trails. Within 2 years of adopting the 2017 General Plan, prepare a Master Plan of Streets and Trails, including specific plans for future major capital projects such as the Cantu-Galleano/ Bellegrave connection, cross sections for unimproved linkages to be developed through land development, and design standards for mobility corridors to address all transportation needs, including rural and local streets and industrial collector streets. Phase 1 of the Plan shall address mobility corridors and major roadways and shall be prepared within 1 year of 2017 General Plan adoption.

Phase two shall include Local Streets, Collectors and the trails network as described in Policy and Program Sections 3.0 and 4.0. The Plan shall be consistent with this Mobility Element.
x

ME 2.1.6
Camino Real . Consider modifying design of Camino Real in residential areas to slow traffic, improve sight distance and facilitate residential driveway use (i.e., cars backing into traffic lanes).
x

ME 2.1.7
Transportation Technology. Consider emerging transportation technologies in reviewing new development, preparing and implementing City policies and programs, and in City transportation planning and design, including autonomous vehicles, signal synchronization, ped -actuated signals , and transportation network performance monitoring.
x
ME 2.1.8
Traffic Study Guidelines. City will prepare and adopt Traffic Study Guidelines to aid in the evaluation of transportation -related impacts to circulation facilities, residential neighborhoods, environmental conditions and open space, and to identify the appropriate mitigation for such impacts.
x
ME 2.1.9
Planned Network Improvements. City will evaluate and where appropriate, include the planned intersection and roadway segment improvements as described in the 2017 General Plan Mobility Element in its Capital Improvement Program. City will implement the improvements as resources allow.
x
ME 3.1.1 Pedestrian and Bikeway Plan. Prepare a comprehensive Master Pedestrian and Bikeway Plan within 2 years of adoption of this General Plan. x

Attachment A
GENERAL PLAN PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION STATUS CY 2023

Page 6 of 34 ends

Program Description Implementation Status
Future Work
Effort In Process Ongoing or
Complete
ME 3.1.2
Zoning Ordinance Update. Update the Zoning Ordinance to require end of trip bicycle facilities, as appropriate to the scale and use of the project, such as bicycle parking, lockers, and showers in new or major remodels of multi-family residential and non - residential uses.
x
ME 3.1.3 Class II Bike Lanes. Identify and designate Class II bike lanes where considered appropriate and there is sufficient curb-to-curb street pave-out width. x

ME 3.1.4
Education. Promote Bicycle and Walking Safety lessons in local recreation programs and collaborate with local schools and law enforcement to offer bicycle and pedestrian skills and safety education programs.
x
ME 3.1.5
Safe Routes to Schools . Expand the Safe Routes to School program, including City sponsorship of bicycle safety training, International Walk/Bike to School events, cyclovias and similar events and encourage all Jurupa Valley schools to get involved. x

ME 3.1.6 Bicycle-Friendly Businesses. Establish a bicycle-friendly business program to incentivize and facilitate use of alternative modes of transportation by employees and customers. x ME 4.1.1
Equestrian and Multipurpose Trails Implementation. Implement the Equestrian Trails Plan as shown in Figure 3-17 (page 3-48) and implement the City Multi-Purpose Trail System Plan, to be developed.
x

ME 4.1.2 Trail Linkages. Locate and design trails to provide access to or link scenic corridors, schools, parks, and other natural areas. x

ME 4.1.3 Trail Access. Require that all development proposals located along a planned trail or trails provide access to the trails system. x

ME 4.1.4
Gated Communities . Ensure that existing and proposed gated communities with dedicated trails and new gated communities do not preclude trails from traversing their properties.
x

Attachment A
GENERAL PLAN PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION STATUS CY 2023

Page 7 of 34 ends

Program Description Implementation Status
Future Work
Effort In Process Ongoing or
Complete
ME 4.1.5
Trail Siting and Design.

Adhere to the following guidelines when siting or designing a trail:

1. Permit urban trails to be located in or along transportation rights -of-way in fee, utility corridors, and along irrigation and flood control waterways so as to take advantage of existing rights-of-way, separate traffic and noise, and provide more services at less cost in one corridor.

2. Secure separate rights-of-way for non -motorized trails when physically, financially and legally feasible.

3. Where a separate right -of-way is not feasible, maintain recreation trails within the City right-of-way.

4. Use trail design standards which will minimize maintenance due to erosion or vandalism.

5. When a trail is to be reserved through the development approval process, base the precise trail alignments on the physical characteristics of the property, assuring connectivity through adjoining properties.

6. Place all recreation trails a safe distance from the edge of active aggregate mining operations and separate them by physical barriers.

7. Install warning signs indicating the presence of a trail at locations where regional or community trails cross public streets with high amounts of traffic and advising where equestrians share right-of-way with motor vehicles.

8. Take into consideration such issues as sensitive habitat areas, flood potentials, access to neighborhoods and open space, safety, alternate land uses, and usefulness for both transportation and alternate land uses when designing and constructing trails.

9. Coordinate with other agencies and/or organizations (such as the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Department of Transportation) to encourage the development of multi - purpose trails. Potential joint uses may include historic and environmental interpretation, access to fishing areas and other recreational uses, opportunities for education, and access for the disabled.

10. Work with landowners to address concerns about privacy, liability, security, and trail maintenance.

x
Attachment A
GENERAL PLAN PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION STATUS CY 2023

Page 8 of 34 ends

Program Description Implementation Status
Future Work
Effort In Process Ongoing or
Complete
ME 4.1.6
Rail Fencing. Require the installation, where appropriate, of rail-type fencing separating road rights-of-way from adjacent trail easements as part of capital improvement projects and land use entitlements. Rail and fencing standards should be specified in the City’s Master Plan of Streets and Trails.
x
ME 4.1.7
Grants. Working with other agencies, the City will seek grants to help develop, operate and maintain a comprehensive trail system Trails are a priority of the City and help link Jurupa Valley’s designated open spaces. Trails also provide connections to activity centers within the City and to adjacent communities, and provide recreation and leisure opportunities.
x
ME 4.1.8 Trail Maintenance Fund. Consider establishing a Trails Maintenance Fund. x ME 5.1.1 Transit Shelters. Work with RTA to identify shelter options to ensure adequate safety and comfort for transit users and encourage RTA to provide bus shelters at all bus stops along Limonite, Mission, and Jurupa Road.
x

Attachment A
GENERAL PLAN PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION STATUS CY 2023

Page 9 of 34 ends

Program Description Implementation Status
Future Work
Effort In Process Ongoing or
Complete
ME 5.1.2
Public Transit Plan. Work with RTA and other transit agencies to prepare a Public Transit Plan for Jurupa Valley. The Plan shall address existing and future public transit needs, opportunities and constraints, and shall integrate the following transit planning principles:

1. Public transit shall have high priority on major and secondary City streets. Where appropriate, transit vehicles should have higher priority than private vehicles.

2. Technology should be applied to increase average speeds of transit vehicles, where appropriate.

3. Transit stops should be easily accessible, with safe and convenient crossing opportunities.

4. Transit stops should be active and attractive public spaces that attract people on a regular basis, at various times of day, and all days of the week.

5. Transit stops function as community destinations. The largest stops and stations should be designed to facilitate programming for a range of community activities and events.

6. Transit stops should include amenities for passengers waiting to board.

7. Transit stops should provide space for a variety of amenities in commercial areas, to serve residents, shoppers, and commuters alike.

8. Transit stops should be attractive and visible from a distance.

9. Transit stop placement and design influences accessibility to transit and network operations, and influences travel behavior/mode choice.

10. Zoning codes, local land use ordinances, and design guidelines around transit stations should encourage walking and a mix of land uses.

11. Streets that connect neighborhoods to transit facilities should be especially attractive, comfortable, and safe and inviting for pedestrians and bicyclists. x
ME 6.1.1
Identify Street Improvements. Identify and where feasible, help Implement street and highway improvements and maintenance projects to provide convenient and economical goods movement, particularly where heavy commercial truck traffic or congestion exists. x

Attachment A
GENERAL PLAN PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION STATUS CY 2023

Page 10 of 34 ends

Program Description Implementation Status
Future Work
Effort In Process Ongoing or
Complete
ME 6.1.2
Establish Truck Routes. Study commercial truck movements and operations in the City and establish weight -restricted truck routes away from noise- sensitive areas, where feasible.

x
ME 6.1.3
Implement Truck Routes. Limit truck traffic in residential and commercial areas to designated truck routes; limit construction and commercial truck through- traffic to designated routes; and include truck routes on City’s Master Plan of Streets and Trails. x
ME 8.1.1 New Interchanges on State Route 60. Construct new interchanges on SR 60 at Camino Real and Sierra Avenue/Pacific Avenue. x
ME 8.1.2
Regional Transportation Facilities and Services. Support the development of regional transportation facilities and services (such as high -occupancy vehicle lanes, express bus service, and fixed transit facilities), which will encourage the use of public transportation and ridesharing for longer-distance trips.
x

ME 8.1.3 New Interchanges on Van Buren Boulevard. Construct new interchanges on Van Buren Boulevard at Jurupa Road and Galena/Bellegrave Avenue. x

ME 8.1.4 Design Guidelines. Develop and implement street and engineering standards for consistency with the design guidelines. x

CONSERVATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT
COS 1.1.1 Riparian Corridors. Identify and protect riparian corridors through zoning, easements, or other measures that ensure effective, long-term conservation. x

COS 1.1.2
Public Information. Provide public information materials regarding the City’s sensitive habitats, the values of watershed, biological resources, and sensitive habitats, and how to protect them.
x

COS 1.1.3
Nature Trail Signage. Working with Community Services Districts and other agencies, help create minimal and appropriate signage along major trails (e.g., Santa Ana River and Jurupa Mountains) for educational outreach about critical habitats and native plant and animal species.
x

COS 1.1.4
Urban Encroachment. Amend the Municipal Code to regulate the establishment or encroachment of non - compatible land uses or activities in habitat areas and passive open space, such as commercial uses, off-road motorized vehicle use, off-trail, non -motorized vehicle use, hang g liding, grading, or other activities that conflict with biological resource conservation goals or policies. x

Attachment A
GENERAL PLAN PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION STATUS CY 2023

Page 11 of 34 ends

Program Description Implementation Status
Future Work
Effort In Process Ongoing or
Complete
COS 1.1.5
Volunteer Conservation Programs. Working with community volunteers, conservation clubs, youth groups, and recreation and conservation agencies, help plan and support conservation activities such as habitat restoration, interpretive signage and tours, trail building, erosion control, and litter removal.
x
COS 1.1.6 Tree Protection Ordinance. Develop a Tree Protection Ordinance. x COS 2.1.1
Preservation Incentives. Develop and provide incentives to private landowners that will encourage the protection of significant wildlife habitat resources, such as density averaging, transfer of development credits, tax incentives, and grants. x
COS 2.1.2
Regulation and Prevention of Destructive Practices. Develop and adopt regulations that effectively regulate dumping, camping, off -road vehicle use, illegal entry, and polluting within protected conservation areas such as the Santa Ana River corridor and the Jurupa Hills along the north City boundary.
x
COS 2.1.3
Wildlife Corridors Map. Develop a Wildlife Corridors Map for Jurupa Valley to assist in the identification, maintenance and enhancement to facilitate wildlife movement and dispersal.
x
COS 3.1.1
Public Information. Promote and support educational outreach programs that provide information services to the public about water conservation techniques, benefits, and water-saving technologies in conjunction with water providers, Riverside County, community services districts, and other entities.
x
COS 3.1.2
Regional Cooperation. Monitor and participate in regional activities addressing water resources, groundwater, and water quality to help ensure adequate and safe water supplies for existing and future residents and businesses. x
COS 3.1.3
Aquifer Recharge. Participate in the development, implementation, and maintenance of a program to recharge the aquifers underlying the City and Western Riverside County, where feasible and appropriate. The program shall make use of flood and other waters to offset existing and future groundwater pumping, except where:

1. Groundwater quality would be reduced;

2. Available groundwater aquifers are full; or

3. Rising water tables threaten the stability of existing structures. x
Attachment A
GENERAL PLAN PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION STATUS CY 2023

Page 12 of 34 ends

Program Description Implementation Status
Future Work
Effort In Process Ongoing or
Complete
COS 3.1.4
Floodway Protection and Enhancement. Working with other responsible agencies, help implement the following actions:

1. Prepare an inventory of natural areas that have been degraded and list sites in priority order, for restoration efforts.

2. Revegetate disturbed areas using native plants.

3. Eliminate sources of water pollutants and improper water diversions.

4. Work to remove invasive, non -native plant species in natural habitat areas, and prevent the introduction or spread of invasive, non-native species.

5. Strongly discourage the placement of and, where possible, remove man -made elements such as buildings, paving, structural elements, concrete lining of waterways, signs, streets, and utilities within floodways or floodplains, unless they are needed for public health or safety, or for implementation of City plans.

6. Require that suitably sized access corridors be provided and/or maintained through or under new and previously established, man-made obstacles to wildlife movement (such as appropriately sized culverts under arterial streets, highways, and other major roads).

7. Prohibit camping, off -road vehicles, hunting and other activities that are not compatible with floodplain health and preservation.

8. Remove trash, debris, and contaminants, using methods that minimally disrupt the open-space resources.

9. Provide continuing community education and outreach for all citizens, youth, and youth groups, and property owners on open space and natural resource values, programs, and responsibilities.

10. Enlist the help of volunteers, youth and service groups, and academic programs in restoring and monitoring habitat health.
x

Attachment A
GENERAL PLAN PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION STATUS CY 2023

Page 13 of 34 ends

Program Description Implementation Status
Future Work
Effort In Process Ongoing or
Complete
COS 4.1.1
Farmland Conservation. Encourage individuals, non-profit agencies, and the County to seek out grants and programs that promote farmland conservation. Such measures may include land trusts, conservation easements, Williamson Act designation, Land Conserva- tion Contracts, Farmland Security Act contracts, the Agricultural Land Stewardship Program Fund; agricultural education programs, density averaging and development standards, and/or incentives (e.g., clustering and density bonuses) to encourage conservation of productive agricultural land.
x
COS 4.1.2
Sustainable Agriculture. Encourage sustainable agricultural practices to protect the health of human and natural communities and to minimize conflicts between agriculture and urban neighbors.
x
COS 5.1.1
Energy-Efficient Operations. Budget for and manage City operations, capital improvements, and facilities for energy efficiency, including purchase and use of fleet vehicles, equipment, and materials.
x
COS 5.1.2 Sustainable Design. Incorporate sustainable design and sustainable energy sources and features in existing and new City facilities. x
COS 5.1.3
Zoning Ordinance Update. Update the Zoning Ordinance to further the energy conservation goals, policies, and implementations actions, and reduce impediments or disincentives to it.
x
COS 5.1.4
Encourage Public Information Programs. Encourage utilities to provide public information programs and energy audits to promote energy conservation and to protect solar access.
x
COS 5.1.5 Energy Grants. Solicit state and federal grants to implement the City’s energy conservation programs as such funding becomes available. x COS 5.1.6
Community Choice Aggregation. Consider working with communities, community service districts, public utilities and WRCOG or similar organizations to establish community choice aggregation programs. These programs allow cities and special districts to aggregate the buying power of individual customers within a defined area to secure alternative energy supply contracts on a community -wide basis, but allowing consumers not wishing to participate to opt-out.

x
Attachment A
GENERAL PLAN PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION STATUS CY 2023

Page 14 of 34 ends

Program Description Implementation Status
Future Work
Effort In Process Ongoing or
Complete
COS 5.1.7
Update City Regulations. Update development and subdivision standards to include clear, specific standards to ensure that desirable solar access is provided for all new development. Standards shall address design priorities for providing and maintaining solar access, such as lot/b uilding orientation, architectural design, collector placement and design, landscaping, and legal requirements to maintain solar access. x
COS 6.1.1 Minerals Inventory. Maintain up-to-date information regarding the location of mineral resource zones in the City. x
COS 6.1.2 City Review. Update City ordinances to require that all proposals for mineral extraction and reclamation be reviewed by the Planning Commission and City Council. x COS 7.1.1
Historic Survey of Resources, Districts, and Neighborhoods. Conduct a survey to identify historic resources, districts and neighborhoods, such as the historic city areas or Rubidoux, Glen Avon, and Pedley with the Historic Resources Overlay and protect and, where possible, enhance their historic character through appropriate district signage, public improvements, and development incentives. x
COS 7.1.2
Historical Preservation Incentives. Consider offering preservation incentives, such as the Mills Act Tax Reduction program to encourage maintenance and restoration of historic properties.
x
COS 7.1.3
Construction in Historic Districts. Prepare (or update, where guidelines already exist) architectural design guidelines to provide specific guidance on the construction of new buildings and public improvements within areas designated in the General Plan with the Historic Resource Overlay, s uch as town centers, historic districts, and historic neighborhoods.
x
COS 7.1.4
Public Information Programs. Foster public awareness and appreciation of cultural resources by sponsoring educational programs or by collaborating with agencies, nonprofit organizations, and citizens groups to provide public information on cultural resources and display artifacts tha t illuminate the City’s history. The City will encourage private development to include historical and archaeological displays where feasible and appropriate.

x
Attachment A
GENERAL PLAN PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION STATUS CY 2023

Page 15 of 34 ends

Program Description Implementation Status
Future Work
Effort In Process Ongoing or
Complete
COS 7.1.5
Cultural Resource Program. Develop a cultural resource program, describing eligible cultural resources, listing criteria, “sensitive and effective” listing procedures, noticing requirements, benefits of listing (e.g., Mills Act, flexible development standards) , and historic plaques and district signage.
x
COS 8.1.1
Protect Open Space Resources. Take the following actions to protect open space, and encourage individuals, organizations, and other agencies to take the same actions within their areas of responsibility and jurisdiction:

1. Open Space Designation. Apply Open Space or Agriculture zoning to private property where equitable development potential is granted to the property owner for the remainder of the land, as appropriate and consistent with General Plan goals and policies.

2. Open Space and Trails Dedication. Preserve or enhance open space and trail resources through the application of conditions of subdivision and development approvals, consistent with General Plan goals and policies.

3. Donations and Grants. Seek and use grants, donations, other revenue sources, and long-term financing mechanisms to purchase fee ownership or easements.

The City will consider allocating funding for open space acquisition and protection and will explore all potential funding sources and other mechanisms.

4. Interagency Cooperation. Promote interagency cooperation for open space acquisition, greenbelt, creeks, wetlands, and wildlife habitat protection in open space areas by coordinating with other government agencies and organizations having interest or expertise in resource protection.
x
COS 9.1.1 Visual assessments . Require evaluations and/or visual simulations for development projects that could affect scenic resources and scenic vistas. x COS 9.1.2
Scenic Highway Designation. Advocate state and county scenic highway designations and protective programs for highways and other roads connecting Jurupa Valley with other communities.
x
COS 9.1.3
Undergrounding Utilities. Place e xisting overhead utilities underground, with highest priority for scenic roadways and entries to the City, and require utilities, community services districts, and other responsible agencies to do likewise. x
Attachment A
GENERAL PLAN PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION STATUS CY 2023

Page 16 of 34 ends

Program Description Implementation Status
Future Work
Effort In Process Ongoing or
Complete
COS 9.1.4
Billboards. Amend the Municipal Code as needed to limit the installation of new billboard signs along scenic corridors and roadways, and to require City Council approval of billboards along scenic corridors.
x
COS 9.1.5
New Development. Ensure that new development within designated scenic highway corridors are designed with adequate site planning, setbacks, non -structural noise buffers, and construction assemblies to avoid the need for sound attenuation walls, while balancing the objectives of maintaining scenic resources with accommodating compatible land uses.
x
COS 9.1.6
Grading. Utilize contour grading and slope rounding to gradually transition graded roads slopes, utilities, and development sites within and adjacent to scenic highway corridors to create natural landscape forms that follow the area’s natural topography. x
COS 10.1.1
Lighting Standards. Develop lighting standards based on the International Dark -Sky Association’s (IDA's) Model Lighting Ordinance, with emphasis on preserving the City’s equestrian, semi-rural character.
x
COS 10.1.2 Retrofit Plan. Establish a retrofitting plan for outdoor lighting on City streets and at City facilities, and encourage community service districts to do the same. x COS 10.1.3 Grant Funding. Seek grant funding for City lighting upgrades, incentive programs, and new fixtures. x
COS 10.1.4 Public Awareness. Develop a dark sky public awareness campaign (e.g., April is Dark Sky Month, dark sky page on City’s website, City Council proclamation). x COS 10.1.5 Regional Collaboration . Collaborate with neighboring jurisdictions to identify the appropriate location and night lighting standards for a dark sky park. x COS 10.1.6 Engineering Standards. Review City engineering standards for possible changes to public street lighting locations, design and spacing to reduce light pollution, improve energy efficiency and maintain safety.

Attachment A
GENERAL PLAN PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION STATUS CY 2023

Page 17 of 34 ends

Program Description Implementation Status
Future Work
Effort In Process Ongoing or
Complete

HOUSING ELEMENT
HE 1.1.1
General Plan and Zoning Amendments. Amend General Plan and Zoning Ordinance and Map to designate 69.2 additional acres for residential use at HHDR density (up to 25 du/acre) to help meet Lower Income RHNA needs; address all by- right requirements pursuant to Government Code section 65583.2, subdivisions (h) and (i); and amend the Zoning Ordinance as
appropriate to be consistent with the General Plan.
x
HE 1.1.2
Housing Authority Coordination. Coordinate with the Riverside County Housing Authority to pursue grant funding and other incentives to promote and assist the nonprofit and/or private production of housing affordable to lower income households.

Utilize public financing tools when available, including revenue bonds, Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), HOME, and Low -Income Housing Ta x Credit (LIHTC) program funds.

x
HE 1.1.3
Mobile Homeowner Assistance . As resources allow, use federal and state grant funds, when available, to assist seniors, veterans and other lower income households purchase and/or improve mobile homes.
x
HE 1.1.4
Affordable Housing Incentives. Consider establishing incentives for developers of new housing that is affordable to lower income households and special needs groups, such as:
fast track/priority application and permit processing, density bonuses and/or fee waivers, assist affordable housing developers with right- of-way acquisition, off-site infrastructure improvements and other development costs, and assist in securing federal or state housing financing resources. Incentives should be considered for new housing developments of 100 or more units in which at least 10% of total units are sold or rented at prices affordable to households with incomes below 80% of the Riverside County Area Median Income (AMI).
x

Attachment A
GENERAL PLAN PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION STATUS CY 2023

Page 18 of 34 ends

Program Description Implementation Status
Future Work
Effort In Process Ongoing or
Complete
HE 1.1.5
Employee Housing Act Ordinance. Update the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code to include provisions for work force housing/ employee housing to ensure consistency with state law, including all requirements for the Employee Housing Act.

x
HE 1.1.6
Affordable Housing Development Review. Develop SB35 expedited review process guide and qualification checklist for the development of affordable housing units in the City for developers.
x
HE 1.1.7
Accessory Dwelling Units. Develop ADU informational materials and 'as built' sample plans to promote the development of ADUs in the City; monitor the production and affordability of ADU’s annually to ensure meeting the assumptions outlined in this element; and revisit the RHNA strategy mid-cycle if ADU production and affordability falls short of assumptions.
x
HE 1.1.8
Density Provisions. Update the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code and General Plan density provisions to ensure consistency with government codes, including minimum density requirements and density bonuses, as required by state law, to encourage production of smaller, affordable housing, particularly in Town Centers and in higher density, mixed- use and other areas where appropriate and compatible with adjacent development. x
HE 1.1.9
Affordable Housing In-Lieu Fees. Establish a City affordable housing fund and affordable housing in-lieu fee program. Work with private housing developers to include affordable units and/or make in-lieu contribution to City’s affordable housing fund. x
HE 1.1.10
City Development Fees. Develop a sliding scale fee assistance program where the amount and type of City development fees may be waived by the City Council based on the number of affordable units proposed (i.e., as the number of affordable units increases, the amount of fee waiver increases).
x
HE 1.1.11 Assistance Programs. Create programs and grant application program to provide the CDBG funds obtained by the City to the community for neighborhood development. x HE 1.1.12
Site Identification. Work with public, private and nonprofit housing entities to identify candidate sites for new construction of rental housing for seniors and other special housing needs, and take all actions necessary to e xpedite processing and approval of qualified projects determined by the City.

x
Attachment A
GENERAL PLAN PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION STATUS CY 2023

Page 19 of 34 ends

Program Description Implementation Status
Future Work
Effort In Process Ongoing or
Complete
HE 1.1.13
Updated Land Use Inventory and Map. Establish and maintain a Land Use Inventory and a map that provide a mechanism to monitor a) acreage and location by General Plan designation, b) vacant and underutilized land, and c) build -out of approved projects utilizing the City’s GIS system and supported by mapping. Maintain the Land Use Inventory on a regular basis, as frequently as budget allows. x
HE 1.1.14
Candidate Sites Mapping. Collaborate with developers to identify vacant and underutilized properties as candidate sites for affordable or mi xed market rate/affordable housing development and identify them in the Land Use Inventory. x
HE 1.1.15
Homeless Shelter. In cooperation with nonprofit organizations, adjacent cities, and with Riverside County, encourage the development of a homeless shelter to meet Jurupa Valley’s and adjacent communities’ homeless shelter needs. x
HE 1.1.16
Homelessness Strategy. Until a permanent shelter or shelters can be established within the City, the City shall work with Riverside County and local housing agencies to help prepare a homelessness strategy to address immediate needs dealing with safety, health and sanitation, environmental health, temporary housing, and access to homeless services. The strategy shall address all special needs categories including, but not limited to, persons with developmental disabilities and farmworkers. x
HE 1.1.17
Update the I -P Zone Parking Standards for Emergency Shelters. Update the I -P Zone parking requirements of the Zoning Ordinance for Emergency Shelters to accommodate all staff working in emergency shelters, provided they do not require more parking for emergency shelters than other commercial uses within the I-P zone.

X
HE 1.1.18
Creative Housing Solutions. Provide incentives to encourage development of a range of creative and affordable housing types to accommodate homeless persons, seniors, disabled persons, and other low and ex tremely low-income populations, such as single room occupancy dwellings (SROs), pre-fabricated housing, so-called “tiny houses,” and other emerging housing products. Potential incentives include priority permit processing, fee waivers or deferrals, fle xible development standards, supporting or assisting with funding applications, and coordinating with housing developers.

Incentives shall address all special needs categories including, but not limited to, persons with developmental disabilities and farm workers.
x `
Attachment A
GENERAL PLAN PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION STATUS CY 2023

Page 20 of 34 ends

Program Description Implementation Status
Future Work
Effort In Process Ongoing or
Complete
HE 1.1.19 Coordination with Non-Profit Housing Providers. Work with non-profit organizations in the production of affordable and self-help housing for all special needs groups. x HE 1.1.20
Flexible Standards. Continue to provide for flexibility in the design of residential development through the processing of planned unit developments (PUDs), area and specific plans, and town center plans, and through the application of Zoning Ordinance provisions allowing flexible lot sizes and development standards. x
HE 1.1.21 Inclusionary housing Ordinance. Study the feasibility of adopting an Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. x
HE 1.1.22
Mixed Housing Types and Densities. Continue to work with residential developers to develop a range of housing types and densities for all income levels, including affordable housing, using creative planning concepts such as traditional neighborhood design, small lot subdivisions, planned unit developments, area and specific plans, and mixed-use development.
x
HE 1.1.23
Lanterman Act Ordinance. Update the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code disability accessibility provisions to ensure consistency with state law, including all requirements for the Lanterman Act. In addition to allowing residential care facilities of six or fewer persons through a ministerial process, larger group homes of seven or more persons must be permitted ministerially, regardless of license. x
HE 1.1.24
Affordable Housing for Disabled Persons. Apply for grant money and as budget allows, help support programs providing increased opportunities for disabled persons in affordable residences rehabilitated or constructed through City or County programs. x
HE 1.1.25
Code and Fee Transparency. Regularly review and update the City’s website and other materials to ensure that planning and development processes, regulations and fees are readily accessible and transparent.
x
HE 1.1.26
Transitional, Temporary and Permanent Supportive Housing, and Low Barrier Navigation Centers . Review and update the City’s Zoning Code to ensure that transitional, temporary and permanent supportive housing and low barrier navigation centers are allowed by-right in zones allowing similar types of residential development as required by state law.
x
Attachment A
GENERAL PLAN PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION STATUS CY 2023

Page 21 of 34 ends

Program Description Implementation Status
Future Work
Effort In Process Ongoing or
Complete
HE 1.1.27
Development within Density Range. Encourage development at the upper limits of the allowable General Plan density range to increase housing choice in the City. Requests for densities below the allowable density range should generally be discouraged e xcept where environmental constraints or other factors limit the development potential of a site.
x
HE 2.1.1
Adaptive Housing Strategies. Develop program to assist in creative strategies for the rehabilitation and adaptive reuse of residential, commercial, and industrial structures for housing, if appropriate
x
HE 2.1.2
Code Enforcement. Ensure that housing is maintained through code enforcement activities. Continue to administer the Code Enforcement Program to eliminate unsafe, illegal, and substandard conditions in residential neighborhoods and residential properties.
x
HE 2.1.3
Affordable Mobile Homes Conservation . Conserve affordable mobile home housing stock and help bring such housing up to code through mobile home loan and improvement grants funded by CDBG and other funds, as available. x
HE 2.1.4
Affordable Homes Conservation. Conserve affordable housing stock and help bring such housing up to code through and improvement grants funded by CDBG and other funds, as available. In addition, where affordable homes are in need of replacement, help with replacement through CDBG and other funds.
x
HE 2.1.5
Bilingual Outreach. As resources allow, provide bilingual outreach materials and activities to educate and inform the community about available housing rehabilitation programs and resources.
x
HE 2.1.6
Monitor Assisted Units. Help ensure that affordable housing assisted with public funds remains affordable for the required time through maintenance of an inventory of assisted units which is monitored for expiration of assisted housing.

Attachment A
GENERAL PLAN PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION STATUS CY 2023

Page 22 of 34 ends

Program Description Implementation Status
Future Work
Effort In Process Ongoing or
Complete
HE 2.1.7
Preserve At-Risk Housing Units. Preserve grant- assisted, bond-financed, density bonus or other types of affordable units at risk of conversion to market rate during the planning period by working with the Riverside County Housing Authority or other nonprofit housing entities to 1) purchase the units using state, federal or local financing and/or subsidies, 2) assist with low or no interest loans for rehabilitation, as budget allows, 3) support bond refinancing, and 4) refer the project sponsor to other federal or local sources of below-market financing. City shall also ensure compliance with state noticing and tenant education requirements.
x
HE 2.1.8
Affordability Covenants. As a condition of project approval, require new affordable housing projects to remain affordable for a specific time, consistent with and as required by the funding program(s) in which they participate, through covenants with the project proponent, Housing Authority or other housing agency.
x
HE 2.1.9
Remove Government Constraints. Evaluate the zoning ordinance, subdivision requirements, and other City regulations to remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing, where appropriate and legally possible. Evaluate and revise as appropriate the City’s density requirements for the Highest Density Residential land use designation (HHDR) to address constraints for housing development including impacts on feasibility of proposals. x
HE 3.1.1
Fair Housing Council. Utilize the services of the Fair Housing Council of Riverside County to implement a number of programs, including: 1) audits of lending institutions and rental establishments, 2) education and training of City staff, and 3) fair housing outreach and education regarding fair housing laws and resources. x
HE 3.1.2
Education and Outreach. Continue to use the services of the Fair Housing Council to provide education and outreach services to the public in both Spanish and English (also see HE 3.1.1 above).
x
HE 3.1.3
Public Housing and Rental Assistance. Develop program to assist in creative strategies for the rehabilitation and adaptive reuse of residential, commercial, and industrial structures for housing, if appropriate.

x
Attachment A
GENERAL PLAN PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION STATUS CY 2023

Page 23 of 34 ends

Program Description Implementation Status
Future Work
Effort In Process Ongoing or
Complete
HE 3.1.4
First-Time Homebuyers Assistance . E xplore the feasibility of developing a new First Time Home Buyer Down Payment Assistance Program, utilizing ta x-exempt mortgage revenue bonds to finance mortgages and down payment assistance for single-family homes for very low and low income first-time homebuyers. x
HE 3.1.5
Multi-Family Dwellings Standards. Establish standards for multiple-family dwellings that will achieve comparable recreation and open space opportunities, protection from sources of noise and degraded air quality, adequate access to public services and facilities and parking,

x
HE 3.1.6
Fair Housing Council. Collaborate with the Fair Housing Council of Riverside County to continue to provide services to the community and accept requests, complaints and assistance for fair housing needs.
x
HE 3.1.7 Reasonable Accommodations. Establish a written procedure for providing reasonable accommodations in zoning code and land use. x
HE 4.1.1
Neighborhood Participation. Implement varied strategies to ensure residents are aware of and able to participate in planning decisions affecting their neighborhoods early in the planning process, such as neighborhood meetings, City Council member visits, and town hall meetings.
x
HE 4.1.2
Neighborhood Needs. Identify specific neighborhood needs, problems, trends, and opportunities for improvements. Work directly with neighborhood groups and individuals to address concerns.
x
HE 4.1.3
Neighborhood Improvements. As budget allows, help fund neighborhood improvements, such as street paving or repairs, sidewalks, pedestrian and equestrian trails, crosswalks, parkways, street trees and other public facilities to improve aesthetics, safety, and accessibility.
x
HE 4.1.4
Neighborhood Pride. Working with Riverside County, CSDs and nonprofit housing entities, develop and promote a Neighborhood Pride Program including cooperative projects with Code Enforcement staff, and Public Works projects in target areas, as funding allows.

x
Attachment A
GENERAL PLAN PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION STATUS CY 2023

Page 24 of 34 ends

Program Description Implementation Status
Future Work
Effort In Process Ongoing or
Complete
HE 5.1.1
Incentives. Consider establishing incentives for energy conservation above and beyond the requirements of Title 24, such as priority permit processing or reduced permit fees on a sliding scale Fee Assistance Program, as budget allows. x

HE 5.1.2
Energy Programs for Lower Income Households. Encourage and participate in Riverside County’s and utility providers’ programs to reduce maintenance and energy costs for households with low incomes and increase efforts to inform the public about available cost-saving, energy conservation programs.
x
HE 5.1.3 Energy Conservation Grants. Pursue grant funds for energy rehab costs and consumer education. x
HE 5.1.4
City Requests for Proposals. City RFPs, contracts, and bidding procedures for capital projects and programs shall incorporate energy conservation and sustainability measures.
x
HE 5.1.5 Sustainable Design. Adopt sustainable design policies, standards and codes that result in attractive, energy-efficient, neighborhoods. x
HE 6.1.1 AFFH Actions. Implement measures to affirmatively further fair housing. [See Attachment C] Air Quality
AQ 1.1.1 Regional Committees. Actively participate on regional committees that can influence regulations affecting air quality. x
AQ 2.1.1 Best Practices. Establish a program to monitor adherence to best practices in distance and setbacks as recommended by CARB and SCAQMD. x
AQ 4.1.1
Truck Parking in Residential Areas. Prohibit the parking of large commercial trucks, trailers, and truck cabs on public -streets in residential areas, e xcept for loading or unloading, through Municipal Code amendments, signage, enforcement, and other measures.
x
AQ 4.1.2
Diesel Fumes. Collaborate with the US EPA, SCAQMD, and warehouse owners and operators to create regulations and programs to reduce the amount of diesel fumes released due to warehousing operations.
x

Attachment A
GENERAL PLAN PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION STATUS CY 2023

Page 25 of 34 ends

Program Description Implementation Status
Future Work
Effort In Process Ongoing or
Complete
AQ 4.1.3
Commercial Truck Parking Lots. Research funding and establish a program to provide incentives and opportunities for commercial truck parking lots to prevent the need for parking trucks, trailers, and truck cabs in residential and other restricted areas.

AQ 4.1.4
Electric Charging Stations. Establish incentives for developers to plan for and install electric vehicle charging stations in new development, and research funding sources for installing electric vehicle charging stations in other strategic locations, such as in government agency facilities.
x
AQ 5.1.1
Waste Management. Working with waste haulers and other appropriate businesses and agencies, establish incentives and programs to encourage the use of recycling and waste management.
x
AQ 6.1.1
Job-Skill Training Opportunities. Actively seek and incentivize educational opportunities and institutions such as community colleges and trade schools to locate within Jurupa Valley to provide local job-skill training opportunities. x
AQ 6.1.2 Funding Programs. Actively seek funding programs to incentivize businesses that meet community needs. x
AQ 7.1.1
Trip Reduction Programs. Pursue grant funding to establish an incentive program to encourage the use of trip reduction programs to decrease automotive vehicle miles traveled.
x
AQ 7.1.2 Traffic Signal Improvements. Construct and improve traffic signals with channelization and Automated Traffic Monitoring and Control systems at appropriate intersections. x AQ 7.1.3
Transportation Management. Consider measures such as Transportation Demand Management, Transportation Systems Management, or jobs/housing balance strategies when developing capital facilities improvement plans. x
AQ 7.1.4
Congestion Monitoring. Develop a program to monitor traffic and congestion to determine when and where the City needs new transportation facilities to achieve increased mobility efficiency.
x

Attachment A
GENERAL PLAN PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION STATUS CY 2023

Page 26 of 34 ends

Program Description Implementation Status
Future Work
Effort In Process Ongoing or
Complete
AQ 9.1.1
Climate Action Plan. Within 2 years of General Plan adoption, prepare and adopt a Climate Action Plan (CAP) for the City, including a 2030 and 2035 reduction target and local emissions inventory. The CAP will be consistent with the WRCOG Subregional CAP but will identify specific additional measures for the reduction of future GHG emissions.

The CAP shall demonstrate how the City will reduce its GHG emissions to 50% below 1990 levels by 2030 and 80% below 1990 levels by 2050, consistent with state law and current guidance on GHG reduction planning.

NOISE ELEMENT
NE 1.1.1
Municipal Code: Amend the Municipal Code to require that development entitlements (e.g., tract maps, site development plans, conditional use permits) comply with the Land Use/Noise Compatibility Matrix, Figure 7-3 above, and with other noise requirements of the General Plan.
x
NE 1.1.2
Noise Guide. The Planning Department shall prepare and maintain a Noise Guide containing “Good Neighbor” guidelines and rules for neighborhood noise reduction and procedures for mitigating noise, and make the Guide available to the public, property owners, and developers.
x
NE 1.1.3
Homeowner Assistance. Assist homeowners living in high noise areas to reduce noise levels in their homes through funding assistance and retrofitting program development, as City resources allow or other agencies provide.
x
NE 1.1.4 Noise Compatibility Assessment. Conduct a noise compatibility assessment of sensitive land uses throughout the City. x
NE 2.1.1
Truck Routes. Prepare and adopt truck routes to direct commercial trucks away from sensitive noise receptors.

x
Attachment A
GENERAL PLAN PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION STATUS CY 2023

Page 27 of 34 ends

Program Description Implementation Status
Future Work
Effort In Process Ongoing or
Complete
NE 2.1.2
City Actions. The City will consider implementing one or more of the following measures where e xisting or cumulative increases in noise levels from new development significantly affect noise-sensitive land uses or residential neighborhoods:

1. Rerouting traffic onto streets that can maintain desired levels of service, consistent with the Mobility Element, and that do not adjoin noise-sensitive land uses.

2. Rerouting commercial trucks onto streets that do not adjoin noise-sensitive land uses.

3. Constructing noise barriers.

4. Reducing traffic speeds through street or intersection design methods (also refer to the Mobility Element).

5. Retrofitting buildings with noise-reducing features.

6. Establishing financial programs, such as low cost loans to owners of noise- impacted property, or requiring noise mitigation or trip reduction programs as a condition of development approval.

7. Encourage and support stepped up enforcement of traffic laws and the California Vehicle Code.
x
NE 2.1.3
City Operations and Purchasing . The City will pursue alternatives to the use of noisy equipment and vehicles, and will purchase equipment and vehicles only if they incorporate the best available noise reduction technology. x
NE 3.1.1
Ensuring Compliance. Ensure that required noise mitigation measures are enforced as a project is built, and in place and/or fully implemented prior to release of occupancy, including enforcement of the State Building Codes regarding Chapter 35, “Sound Transmission Control,” as amended, and “Noise Insulation Standards” (California Code of Regulations, Title 24).
x
NE 3.1.2
Stationary Noise Regulations. Review and revise the City’s Noise Ordinance to ensure there are adequate stationary noise regulations in effect to protect the quality of life of Jurupa Valley.
x

Attachment A
GENERAL PLAN PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION STATUS CY 2023

Page 28 of 34 ends

Program Description Implementation Status
Future Work
Effort In Process Ongoing or
Complete
NE 4.1.1
Rail-Related Noise. Minimize the noise impact of passenger (Metrolink) and freight rail service on sensitive land uses by coordinating with rail authorities to effectively manage train noise and by establishing and enforcing noise mitigation measures that apply to rail uses.
x
NE 4.1.2
Quiet Zone Crossings. Require new development in the vicinity of railroad crossings that are within 1,000 feet of existing residential neighborhoods to design and construct Quiet Zone railroad crossing improvements and seek to qualify for a Quiet Zone designation. x

COMMUNITY SAFETY, SERVICES AND FACILITIES ELEMENT
CSSF 1.1.1
Hazard Mitigation. Mitigate potential seismic hazards through the adoption and strict enforcement of current building codes, which will be amended as necessary when local deficiencies are identified.
x
CSSF 1.1.2 Liaison Program. Develop a liaison program with all water purveyors to prevent water extraction-induced subsidence. x
CSSF 1.1.3 Density Transfer. Develop a program to allow the transfer of allowable density from high- risk areas to low-risk areas. x
CSSF 1.1.4
Unreinforced Masonry Buildings . Inventory unreinforced masonry buildings in Jurupa Valley, develop retrofitting guidelines , and research possible funding sources to assist with building retrofits.
x
CSSF 1.1.5 Property Acquisition. As resources allow, acquire property in high -risk flood zones and designate the land as open space for public use or wildlife habitat. x CSSF 1.1.6
Giant Cane and Other Invasive Plant Species. Encourage and, as resources allow, support the efforts of SAWPA, the County of Riverside, and other agencies to remove Giant Cane and other invasive, non -native plant species from the Santa Ana River corridor and restore native riparian habitat.
x
CSSF 1.1.7 Lifeline Facilities. Develop an inundation response plan for any lifeline facilities and dependent care facilities located in designated flood zones. x CSSF 1.1.8 Risk Assessment. Assess and upgrade inundation risk and protection and utilize information and research from regional planning agencies and others focusing on resiliency after a disaster. x
Attachment A
GENERAL PLAN PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION STATUS CY 2023

Page 29 of 34 ends

Program Description Implementation Status
Future Work
Effort In Process Ongoing or
Complete
CSSF 1.1.9 Emergency Response Plans. Periodically review and update emergency response plans to reflect current flood protection standards. x
CSSF 1.1.10
Fire Safety Planning. Conduct and implement long-range fire safety planning, including updating building, fire, subdivision, and municipal code standards, improved infrastructure, and improved mutual aid agreements with the private and public sectors. x
CSSF 1.1.11
Fire Response Agreements. Review inter -jurisdictional fire response agreements, and improve firefighting resources as recommended in the County Fire Protection Master Plan, to keep pace with development and to ensure that:

1. Fire reporting and response times do not e xceed those listed in the County Fire Protection Master Plan identified for each of the development densities described;

2. Fire flow requirements (water for fire protection) are consistent with Insurance Service Office (ISO) recommendations; and

3. The planned deployment and height of aerial ladders and other specialized equipment and apparatus are sufficient for the intensity of development anticipated.
x
CSSF 1.1.12
Post-Disaster Recovery. Develop plans for short -term and long -term post-disaster recovery utilizing information and research from regional planning organizations and other organizations focusing on resiliency after disasters. x
CSSF 1.1.13
Safeguard Instructure . Coordinate with the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) and/or utilize the Capital Improvement Program, to strengthen, relocate, or take other appropriate measures to safeguard high -voltage lines, water, sewer, natural gas, and petroleum pipelines, and trunk electrical and telephone conduits that:

1. Ex tend through areas of high liquefaction potential;

2. Cross-active faults; or

3. Traverse earth cracks or landslides.
x
CSSF 1.1.14
Earthquake Drills. Conduct City earthquake drills and, where appropriate:

1. Develop internal scenarios for City emergency response, including emergency drills; and

2. Test backup power generators in public facilities and other critical facilities taking part in emergency drills.
x
Attachment A
GENERAL PLAN PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION STATUS CY 2023

Page 30 of 34 ends

Program Description Implementation Status
Future Work
Effort In Process Ongoing or
Complete
CSSF 1.1.15
Information Dissemination. Improve management and emergency dissemination of information using portable computers with geographic information systems and disaster- resistant Internet access, to obtain:

1. Hazardous Materials Disclosure Business Plans regarding the location and type s of hazardous materials;

2. Real-time information on seismic, geologic, or flood hazards; and

3. T he locations of high -occupancy, immobile populations, potentially hazardous building structures, utilities, and other lifelines.
x
CSSF 2.1.1
Evaluate Municipal Services. Allocate municipal
resources to evaluate the need, cost, and feasibility of the City assuming responsibility for providing facilities or services currently provided by other agencies. x
CSSF 2.1.2
Planning Applications. Route new Planning applications to the Sheriff’s Department to increase public safety and maintain close coordination with the Sheriff’s Department and law enforcement programs.
x
CSSF 2.1.3
Incentivize Advanced Educational Opportunities. Review the Zoning Ordinance to identify potential zones, locations, development incentives, and requirements for advanced educational and occupational training schools
and similar facilities. Make this information available to potential applicants, real estate and development professionals, marketing and construction firms, and local school districts.
x
CSSF 2.1.4
Master Plan. In cooperation with JARPD, County of Riverside and other responsible agencies, prepare and adopt a Joint Recreational Opportunities and Open Space Master Plan that identifies recreation goals, priorities for park e xpansion, acquisition, improvement, and funding. The Plan will be adopted within 2 years of General Plan adoption and updated at least every 10 years.
x
CSSF 2.1.5
Urban Water Management Plan. Work with local water purveyors to prepare a unified Urban Water Management Plan for Jurupa Valley and to ensure that the Plan is updated as needed.
x
CSSF 2.1.6 Alternative Water Resources. Explore the feasibility of desalinization and other regional projects as additional sources of local water. x
Attachment A
GENERAL PLAN PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION STATUS CY 2023

Page 31 of 34 ends

Program Description Implementation Status
Future Work
Effort In Process Ongoing or
Complete
CSSF 2.1.7
Multi-Modal Trails. Develop a multi -agency program with the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, the Jurupa Area Recreation and Park District, and the City for the use of flood control channels and associated maintenance and accessways for pedestrian, bicycle, and equestrian trails. x

ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE ELEMENT
EJ 1.1.1
Alternative Funding Strategies. Pursue alternate funding strategies to maintain the financial stability of Jurupa Valley so as to enable the City to implement the principles of environmental justice described in this Element.
x
EJ 2.1.1 Truck Routes. Designate truck routes to avoid residential areas including low-income and minority neighborhoods. x
EJ 2.1.2
Training. Provide staff and City officials training on the principles and methods of comprehensive public participation. Guidelines for how to conduct staff/official training are contained in the Cal/EPA Environmental Justice Advisory Committee Recommendations.
x

HEALTHY COMMUNITIES ELEMENT
HC 1.1.12
Health Events. Sponsor special City health events, Mayor’s Walks, and similar activities to raise resident awareness of health programs and to promote healthy neighborhood activities, such as cleanup days and bike rodeos.
x
HC 1.1.2
Public Health Information. Collaborate with local health providers to provide public health information, programs and events at local community centers, parks, food markets, and other public places.
x
HC 2.1.1
Zoning for Local Food Outlets. Encourage the development of healthy food outlets, small neighborhood markets, farmers’ markets, and food cooperatives in residential zones by adopting flexible zoning standards to allow such uses where appropriate. x
HC 2.1.2
Community Gardens. Identify and inventory potential community garden/urban farm sites on e xisting parks, utility easements and rights of way, and prioritize site use as community gardens in appropriate locations.
x

Attachment A
GENERAL PLAN PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION STATUS CY 2023

Page 32 of 34 ends

Program Description Implementation Status
Future Work
Effort In Process Ongoing or
Complete
HC 2.1.3
Grant Funding. Seek grant funding and innovative public -private partnerships, where feasible, to increase residents’ access to healthy foods and opportunities for physical activity, especially in underserved areas.
x
HC 4.1.1
Neighborhood Markets . Amend the Zoning Ordinance to allow small, neighborhood - serving markets within easy walking and biking distance from most residential areas, and encourage such markets to include fruits, vegetables, and other healthy foods. x
HC 4.1.2
Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. Implement the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan and allocate a portion of the annual City budget, as resources allow, to complete bike and sidewalk projects that infill public sidewalk gaps and provide connectivity. x
HC 4.1.3 Community Gardens. Amend the Zoning Ordinance to allow the development of community gardens throughout the City. x
HC 4.1.4 Compatible Agriculture. Amend the Zoning Ordinance to allow compatible agriculture uses in Residential, Commercial, and Public zones. x
HC 4.1.5
Risk Reduction. Pursue grants and other funding for projects that reduce the risk of pedestrian/vehicle collisions and equestrian/vehicle interactions, particularly in areas where there are frequent incidents.
x
HC 4.1.6 Traffic Calming. Implement traffic calming and traffic-slowing measures on roads with a high level of pedestrian and non-motorized vehicle activity. x HC 4.1.7 Safety Features. Incorporate safety features for non -motorized travel within road improvement projects, as resources allow. x
HC 4.1.8 Equestrian Crossings . Provide special accommodations for equestrians at crossings where trails and roads intersect. x
HC 6.1.1 Street Tree Master Plan. Prepare a Street Tree Master Plan to address tree preservation, planting, and maintenance. x
HC 6.1.2
Pilot “Edible Landscape” Program. Establish a pilot Community Living Gardens program in cooperation with volunteer groups and other agencies; identify viable community garden sites, and consider the feasibility of planting fruit trees in local parks, parkways, and on publicly controlled parties.

x
Attachment A
GENERAL PLAN PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION STATUS CY 2023

Page 33 of 34 ends

Program Description Implementation Status
Future Work
Effort In Process Ongoing or
Complete

ECONOMIC SUSTAINABILITY ELEMENT
ES 1.1.1
Economic Development Strategy. Prepare and adopt an Economic Development Strategy to achieve the goals of this General Plan and to capitalize on economic development opportunities.
x
ES 1.1.2
Cost of Services Study/Impact Fees. Conduct a cost of municipal services study and, if warranted, consider establishing impact fees to defray costs of maintaining and improving municipal services and facilities.
x
ES 1.1.3
Regional Economic Influence. Build Jurupa Valley’s role as a regional economic leader through active participation in local and regional business forums, regional economic and transportation planning, and recruitment activities, as resources allow. x
ES 1.1.4
Public Project Coordination. Consider establishing a mechanism to coordinate public projects, activities and fees of various public agencies and address their impact on economic development within the City.
x
ES 2.1.1
Industrial Development Profiles. Prepare development profiles for specific industrial opportunity sites, including information on site attributes, allowed land use and development standards, relevant County or City approvals, and potential development incentives.
x
ES 3.1.1
Business Retention Strategy. Adopt a Business Retention and E xpansion (BRE) Program to address outreach strategies, business improvement and marketing in town centers, feasibility of business improvement districts, and potential business incentives. x
ES 3.1.2
Branding and Business Attraction. Prepare and adopt an Economic Development Strategy, including: 1) branding and business attraction strategy to establish a unified identity for Jurupa Valley based on its unique character, quality of life, and business attributes, and 2) a communications program to publicize the Jurupa Valley brand for residents, visitors, and potential visitors.
x
ES 3.1.3
Commercial Corridors. Work with property owners along the principal commercial corridors, including Mission Boulevard, Rubidou x Boulevard, Limonite Avenue, and Jurupa Road to explore General Plan and zoning strategies to consolidate commercial uses into vibrant nodes and allow residential development along the corridors. x
Attachment A
GENERAL PLAN PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION STATUS CY 2023

Page 34 of 34 ends

Program Description Implementation Status
Future Work
Effort In Process Ongoing or
Complete
ES 3.1.4 Business Visitation Program. Establish and operate a City business visitation program to improve communication and understanding of business needs, opportunities, and issues. x ES 3.1.5 Mayor’s Business Awards Program. Consider initiating an annual Mayor’s Business Award to recognize Jurupa Valley’s outstanding business citizens and businesses. x ES 3.1.6
Beautification of Commercial Areas. In order to make Jurupa Valley more attractive to new investment and stimulate retail sales, the City Council shall adopt standards for the maintenance and beautification of commercial areas. Such standards may be in the form of
a property maintenance ordinance, business improvement district or other mechanism and should address tree removal and replacement, planting and maintenance, as well as trash and graffiti removal.
x
ES 4.1.1
Commercial Recreation and Visitor Attraction Plan. Prepare and adopt a commercial recreation and visitor attraction plan in cooperation with the Chamber of Commerce and other interested parties, which identifies the City’s recreational, equestrian, cultural and tourism assets, potential resources and funding sources, potential land use and zoning incentives, target uses, businesses and/or attractions, and marketing strategies. x
ES 5.1.1
Business Incubator. Explore opportunities to collaborate with a business “incubator” in Jurupa Valley, such as a research and technology development campus, a regional occupation center, or a technology training institute.
x
ES 6.1.1
Fulfillment Center and Logistics. Give a high priority to attracting a new point -of-sale fulfillment center and logistics industrial projects based on low market vacancies and growth in those sectors.
x
ES 6.1.2
Economic Development Strategy. Ensure that the City’s Economic Development Strategy includes specific implementation measures and include a monitoring and evaluation program to evaluate the effectiveness of City economic development actions. x

Attachment B
AFFIRMATIVELY FURTHERING FAIR HOUSING IMPLEMENTATION STATUS 2023

Page 1 of 3 ends

Action Area Description Implementation Status
Future Work
Effort In Process Ongoing or
Complete
Housing Mobility
ADUs

1. Develop ADU informational materials and ‘as built’ sample plans to promote the development of ADUs in the City.

2. Monitor the production and affordability of ADUs annually to ensure the City is meeting the assumption of 15 AUDs per year as outlined in this Housing Element.
x

PUBLIC HOUSING AND

RENTAL ASSISTANCE

1. Encourage the HARC to continue to provide housing choice vouchers to a minimum of 344 households in Jurupa Valley and increase voucher usage in higher opportunity areas.

2. Work with HARC and FHCRC to encourage small property owners to participate in HACR’s Housing Choice Voucher Assistance Program X
New Opportunities in Higher Opportunity Areas

PROVIDE HOUSING

OPPORTUNITIES IN HIGHER

OPPORTUNITY AREAS FOR

ALL MEMBERS OF THE

COMMUNITY

1. Provide incentives to encourage the development of a range of creative and affordable housing types to accommodate homeless persons, seniors, disabled persons, and other low and extremely low -income populations, such as single -room occupancy dwellings (SROs), prefabricated housing, tiny houses, and other emerging housing products through fee waivers or deferrals, flexible development standards, supporting funding applications, etc.

2. Work with local developers to include affordable housing units in all new housing developments during the entitlement process.

3. Develop an inclusionary housing ord inance to increase the variety of affordable housing to provide for special needs groups that aren’t being reached right now according to the AFFH.

4. Allocate funding for Infrastructure improvements citywide including, but not limited to, pedestrian and bicycle improvements, complete streets and corridor beautification, ADA improvements, and Safe Routes to School enhancements with a priority in the most economically impacted neighborhoods.

x
Attachment B
AFFIRMATIVELY FURTHERING FAIR HOUSING IMPLEMENTATION STATUS 2023

Page 2 of 3 ends

Action Area Description Implementation Status
Future Work
Effort In Process Ongoing or
Complete

TRADITIONAL

NEIGHBORHOOD DESIGN

STANDARDS

1. Promote the development of smaller single -family homes on smaller lots using the Traditional Neighborhood Design Standards to developers through the entitlement process. Also develop promotional materials such as educational fliers/handouts on Traditional Neighborhood Design Standards for dissemination to the development community and in meetings with developers.

X
Place-based Strategies for Community Revitalization

AFFORDABLE MOBILE

HOMES CONSERVATION

1. Conserve affordable mobile home housing stock and help bring such housing up to code through periodic outreach and mobile home loan and improvement grants funded by CDBG and other funds, as available.

SUBSTANDARD HOUSING

CONDITIONS

1. Allocate CDBG grant for housing update and rehabilitation for most aged housing stock for homes older than 50 years. X

ENFORCEMENT AND

OUTREACH TO REDUCE

DISCRIMINATION

1. Allocate CDBG funding to creating locally hosted educational workshops on fair housing to reduce the amount of discrimination

2. Provide social media and fact sheets/resource alternatives to access fair housing info with links to the City website

3. Collaborate with Fair Housing Council of Riverside County for continued tracking of fair housing enforcement for discrimination cases.

SUPPORT AT-RISK

CHILDREN AND YOUTH

1. Provide informational materials on the Youth Opportunity Center at City Hall and promote the Center through social media platforms and regular updates at City Council meetings.

2. Make meeting rooms available to the Center at the City’s Jurupa Valley Operations Center located in the Rubidoux area.

3. Assist the Center in the preparation of grant applications as needed.

4. Work with the Rubidoux Youth Opportunity Center to promote their services in census tracts with concentrated poverty and highest need.

PROVIDE ADDITIONAL

PARKLAND IN AREAS OF

CONCENTRATED POVERTY

1. Provide technical support and assistance to JARPD to acquire and develop an ¾ acre park in the Mission / Wallace / Daly area. X

Attachment B
AFFIRMATIVELY FURTHERING FAIR HOUSING IMPLEMENTATION STATUS 2023

Page 3 of 3 ends

Action Area Description Implementation Status
Future Work
Effort In Process Ongoing or
Complete

PROMOTE MEANINGFUL

ENGAGEMENT IN THE

PUBLIC DECISION-MAKING

PROCESS

1. Ensure that affected residents have the opportunity to participate in decisions that affect their health (EJ 1.1).

2. Schedule public meetings on key issues affecting the public at times and locations most convenient to community members (EJ 1.4).

3. Provide translation and interpretation services at public meetings on issues affecting populations whose primary language is not English.

Translation time sh ould not be taken from the person’s time limit for comments (EJ 1.6).

X
Displacement

DISPLACEMENT RISK OF

LOW-INCOME RESIDENTS

DUE TO ECONOMIC

PRESSURES

1. Work with FHCRC to continue to provide access to aid and financial counseling for residents and develop an outreach plan for the neighborhoods with the greatest concentration of poverty.

2. Promote the development of affordable units through City polic ies and State Law on every housing project in entitlement
X

Jurisidiction Name
Reporting Calendar Year
First Name
Last Name
Title Click here to download APR Instructions
Email
Phone
Street Address
City
Zipcode
v_2_15_24
Click here to add rows to a table. If you add too many rows, you may select a cell in the row you wish to remove and type ctrl + d.
8930 Limonite Avenue
Jurupa Valley
92509
Angie
Hanifin
Housing Manager
[email protected]
9513326464
Mailing Address
Please Start Here
General Information
2023
Jurupa Valley
Contact Information
Optional: Click here to import last year's data. This is best used when the workbook is new and empty. You will be prompted to pick an old workbook to import from. Project and program data will be copied exactly how it was entered in last year's form and must be updated. If a project is no longer has any reportable activity, you may delete the project by selecting a cell in the row and typing ctrl + d.

Annual Progress Report January 2020
Optional: This runs a macro which checks to ensure all required fields are filled out. The macro will create two files saved in the same directory this APR file is saved in. One file will be a copy of the APR with highlighted cells which require information. The other file will be list of the problematic cells, along with a description of the nature of the error.

Optional: Save before running. This copies data on Table A2, and creates another workbook with the table split across 4 tabs, each of which can fit onto a single page for easier printing. Running this macro will remove the comments on the column headers, which contain the instructions. Do not save the APR file after running in order to preserve comments once it is reopened.

Optional: This macro identifies dates entered that occurred outside of the reporting year. RHNA credit is only given for building permits issued during the reporting year.

Link to the online system: https://apr.hcd.ca.gov/APR/login.do Toggles formatting that turns cells green/yellow/red based on data validation rules.

Submittal Instructions
Please save your file as Jurisdictionname2023 (no spaces). Example: the city of San Luis Obispo would save their file as SanLuisObispo2023 Housing Element Annual Progress Reports (APRs) forms and tables must be submitted to HCD and the Governor's Office of Planning and Research (OPR) on or before April 1 of each year for the prior calendar year; submit separate reports directly to both HCD and OPR pursuant to Government Code section 65400. There are two options for submitting APRs:

1. Online Annual Progress Reporting System - Please see the link to the online system to the left. This allows you to upload the completed APR form into directly into HCD’s database limiting the risk of errors. If you would like to use the online system, email [email protected] and HCD will send you the login information for your jurisdiction. Please note: Using the online system only provides the information to HCD. The APR must still be submitted to OPR. Their email address is [email protected].

2. Email - If you prefer to submit via email, you can complete the excel Annual Progress Report forms and submit to HCD at [email protected] and to OPR at [email protected]. Please send the Excel workbook, not a scanned or PDF copy of the tables.

Jurisdiction Jurupa Valley
Reporting Year 2023
Housing Element Planning Period 6th Cycle
Current Year
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed
Restricted 16
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed
Restricted 25
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed
Restricted 25
62 128
Units by Structure Type Entitled Permitted Completed
Single-family Attached 0 0 0
Single-family Detached 0 57 118
2 to 4 units per structure 0 0 0
5+ units per structure 0 0 0
Accessory Dwelling Unit 48 71 42
Mobile/Manufactured Home 0 0 0
Total 48 128 160
Infill Housing Developments and Infill Units Permitted # of Projects Units 128 128
0 0
(Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
10/15/2021 - 10/15/2029
Very Low
Low
Moderate
Total Units
Housing Applications Summary
Note: Units serving extremely low-income households are included in the very low-income permitted units totals Above Moderate
Indicated as Infill
Not Indicated as Infill
Building Permits Issued by Affordability Summary
Income Level
48 37
48 0
0 0
Income Rental Ownership Total
Very Low 0 0 0
Low 0 0 0
Moderate 0 0 0
Above Moderate 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0
Streamlining Provisions Used - Permitted Units # of Projects Units SB 9 (2021) - Duplex in SF Zone 0 0
SB 9 (2021) - Residential Lot Split 0 0
AB 2011 (2022) 0 0
SB 6 (2022) 0 0
SB 35 (2017) 0 0
Ministerial and Discretionary Applications # of Applications Units Ministerial 48 37
Discretionary 0 0
Density Bonus Applications and Units Permitted
Number of Applications Submitted Requesting a Density Bonus 0 Number of Units in Applications Submitted Requesting a Density Bonus 0 Number of Projects Permitted with a Density Bonus 0
Number of Units in Projects Permitted with a Density Bonus 0 Units Constructed - SB 35 Streamlining Permits
Number of SB 35 Streamlining Applications Approved
Total Housing Applications Submitted:

Number of Proposed Units in All Applications Received:

Total Housing Units Approved:

Total Housing Units Disapproved:

Use of SB 35 Streamlining Provisions - Applications
Number of SB 35 Streamlining Applications
Housing Element Programs Implemented and Sites Rezoned Count 53 7
Programs Implemented
Sites Rezoned to Accommodate the RHNA
Jurisdiction Jurupa Valley ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Note: "+" indicates an optional field Reporting Year 2023 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Planning Period 6th Cycle 10/15/2021 - 10/15/2029
Date
Application
Submitted
Total
Approved
Units by
Project
Total
Disapproved
Units by
Project
Streamlining
2 3 4 6 7 8 9
Prior APN+ Current APN Street Address Project Name+ Local Jurisdiction Tracking ID
Unit Category
(SFA,SFD,2 to
4,5+,ADU,MH)
Tenure
R=Renter
O=Owner
Date
Application
Submitted
(see
instructions)
Very Low-
Income Deed
Restricted
Very Low-
Income Non
Deed
Restricted
Low-Income
Deed
Restricted
Low-Income
Non Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income
Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income
Non Deed
Restricted
Above
Moderate-
Income
Total PROPOSED
Units by Project
Total

APPROVED
Units by project
Total

DISAPPROVED
Units by Project
Please select
streamlining
provision/s the
application was
submitted
pursuant to.

Did the housing
development
application seek
incentives or
concessions
pursuant to
Government Code
section 65915?
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below 0 11 0 17 0 17 3 37 48 0 167-371-009 10054 BERKSHIRE DR, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 MA21042 ADU R 8/31/2023 1 0 1 NONE No 161-260-012 6095 RIDGEVIEW AVE, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 91752 MA21161 ADU R 1/17/2023 1 0 1 NONE No 162-082-026 5536 BEACH ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 MA21221 ADU R 8/31/2023 1 0 1 NONE No 181-101-041 3970 MENNES AVE, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 MA21223 ADU R 8/31/2023 1 0 1 NONE No 160-210-067 11680 NIAGARA DR, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 91752 MA21236 ADU R 8/31/2023 1 0 1 NONE No 161-092-003 5550 DODD ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 91752 MA21287 ADU R 8/31/2023 1 0 1 NONE No 169-201-022 4426 PEDLEY RD, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 MA21293 ADU R 9/19/2023 1 0 1 NONE No 167-241-021 5198 CEDAR ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 MA21308 ADU R 8/31/2023 1 0 1 NONE No 183-182-005 6833 CONDOR DR, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 MA21310 ADU R 8/31/2023 1 0 1 NONE No 160-182-003 11601 ARGUELLO DR, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 91752 MA21328 ADU R 8/25/2023 1 0 1 NONE No 167-071-008 5280 ALLISON LN, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 MA22004 ADU R 8/18/2023 1 0 1 NONE No 167-131-029 9732 WEBB ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 MA22017 ADU R 7/28/2023 1 1 1 NONE No 0 178-113-010 5316 24TH ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 MA22079 ADU R 6/30/2023 1 1 1 NONE No 160-133-015 11217 PALA PL, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 91752 MA22098 ADU R 1/20/2023 1 1 1 NONE No 159-122-011 10434 48TH ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 91752 MA22099 ADU R 8/23/2023 1 1 1 NONE No 171-220-002 7837 GALENA ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 MA22119 ADU R 7/6/2023 1 1 1 NONE No 167-221-002 9465 51ST ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 MA22135 ADU R 8/8/2023 1 1 1 NONE No 167-071-007 5310 ALLISON LN, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 MA22157 ADU R 8/29/2023 1 1 1 NONE No 182-321-017 4301 RIVERVIEW DR, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 MA22159 ADU R 9/8/2023 1 1 1 NONE No 179-251-016 3638 WALLACE ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 MA22161 ADU R 1/11/2023 1 1 1 NONE No 179-032-021 5898 SAMANTHA PL, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 MA22164 ADU R 9/8/2023 1 1 1 NONE No 181-071-002 3889 RUBIDOUX BLVD, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 MA22165 ADU R 9/8/2023 1 1 1 NONE No 182-262-014 5928 DE LA VISTA, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 MA22167 ADU R 9/8/2023 1 1 1 NONE No 178-211-016 5672 NEWTON ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 MA22168 ADU R 9/8/2023 1 1 1 NONE No 178-192-019 5718 29TH ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 MA22169 ADU R 3/28/2023 1 1 1 NONE No 179-032-008 5862 ANTONIA PL, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 MA22171 ADU R 2/8/2023 1 1 1 NONE No 178-211-016 5728 Newton ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 MA22172 ADU R 2/15/2023 1 1 1 NONE No 179-281-007 5255 35TH ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 MA22173 ADU R 2/8/2023 1 1 1 NONE No 177-080-008 6552 34TH ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 MA22177 ADU R 2/10/2023 1 1 1 NONE No Table A
Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas
51 Project Identifier Unit Types Proposed Units - Affordability by Household Incomes Density Bo Applica
10 Housing Development Applications Submitted
Jurisdiction Jurupa Valley ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Reporting Year 2023 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas Planning Period 6th Cycle 10/15/2021 - 10/15/2029
Table A2
Streamlining Infill
Housing without Financial
As s is tance or Deed
Restrictions
Term of Affordability
or Deed Restriction Notes
2 3 5 6 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Prior APN+ Current APN Street Address Project Name + Local Jurisdiction Tracking ID
Unit Category
(SFA,SFD,2 to
4,5+,A DU,MH)
Tenure
R=Re nte r
O=Ow ner
Very Low-
Income Deed
R estricted
Very Low-
Income Non
D eed
R estricted
Low- Income
D eed
R estricted
Low- Income
Non Deed
R estricted
Moderate-
Income Deed
R estricted
Moderate-
Income Non
D eed
R estricted
Above
Moderate-
Income
Entitlement
Date Approved # of Units issued
E ntitlements
Very Low-
Income Deed
R estricted
Very Low-
Income Non
D eed
R estricted
Low- Income
D eed
R estricted
Low- Income
Non Deed
R estricted
Moderate-
Income Deed
R estricted
Moderate-
Income Non
D eed
R estricted
Above
Moderate-
Income
Building Permits
D ate Issued
# of Units Issued
Building Permits
Very Low-
Income Deed
R estricted
Very Low-
Income Non
D eed
R estricted
Low-
Income
D eed
R estricted
Low-
Income
Non Deed
R estricted
Moderate-
Income
D eed
R estricted
Moderate-
Income Non
D eed
R estricted
Above
Moderate-
Income
Certificates of
Occupancy or other
forms of readiness
(see instructions)
D ate Issued
# of Units
issued
Certificates of
Occupancy or
other forms of
readiness
How many of
the units were
Extremely Low
Income?
Please select the
streamlining
provision the
project w as

APPROV ED
pursuant to. (may
select multiple)
Infill Units?
Y/N+
Assistance Programs
for E ach Development
(may select multiple -
see instructions)
D eed R estriction
Type
(may select
multiple - see
instructions)
For units affordable without
financial assistance or deed
restrictions, explain how the
locality determined the units
were affordable
(see instructions)
Term of Affordability or
D eed R estriction
(years) (if affordable in
perpetuity enter 1000)+
Number of
D emolished/D estroye
d Units
Demolished or
D estroyed
Units
Demolished/D
estroyed U nits
Owner or
R enter
Total Density Bonus Applied
to the Project (Percentage
Increase in Total Allow able
Units or Total Maximum
Allow able Residential Gross
Floor Area)
Number of Other
Incentives,
Concessions,
Waivers, or Other
Modifications Given to
the Project (E xcluding
Parking Waivers or
Parking Reductions)
List the incentives,
concessions,
w aivers, and
modifications
(E xcluding Parking
Waivers or Parking
Modifications)
D id the project receive a
reduction or waiver of
parking standards? (Y/N)
Note s+
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below 0 11 0 17 0 17 3 48 0 16 0 25 0 25 62 128 0 10 0 15 0 15 120 160 24 0 167-371-009 10054 BERKSHIRE DR, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 MA21042 A DU R 1 8/31/2023 1 0 0 1 NONE Y SCAG Projections 161-260-012 6095 RIDGEVIEW AVE, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 91752 MA21161 A DU R 1 1/17/2023 1 0 0 1 NONE Y SCAG Projections 162-082-026 5536 BEACH ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 MA21221 A DU R 1 8/31/2023 1 0 0 1 NONE Y SCAG Projections 181-101-041 3970 MENNES AVE, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 MA21223 A DU R 1 8/31/2023 1 0 0 1 NONE Y SCAG Projections 160-210-067 11680 NIAGARA DR, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 91752 MA21236 A DU R 1 8/31/2023 1 0 0 1 NONE Y SCAG Projections 161-092-003 5550 DODD ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 91752 MA21287 A DU R 1 8/31/2023 1 0 0 1 NONE Y SCAG Projections 169-201-022 4426 PEDLEY RD, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 MA21293 A DU R 1 9/19/2023 1 0 0 1 NONE Y SCAG Projections 167-241-021 5198 CEDAR ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 MA21308 A DU R 1 8/31/2023 1 0 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 183-182-005 6833 CONDOR DR, JURUPA V A LLEY , CA 92509 MA21310 A DU R 1 8/31/2023 1 0 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 160-182-003 11601 ARGUELLO DR, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 91752 MA21328 A DU R 1 8/25/2023 1 0 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 167-071-008 5280 ALLISON LN, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 MA22004 A DU R 1 8/18/2023 1 0 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 167-131-029 9732 WEBB ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 MA22017 A DU R 1 7/28/2023 1 0 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 0 0 0
178-113-010 5316 24TH ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 MA22079 A DU R 1 6/30/2023 1 0 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 160-133-015 11217 PALA PL, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 91752 MA22098 A DU R 1 1/20/2023 1 0 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 159-122-011 10434 48TH ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 91752 MA22099 A DU R 1 8/23/2023 1 0 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 171-220-002 7837 GALENA ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 MA22119 A DU R 1 7/6/2023 1 0 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 167-221-002 9465 51ST ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 MA22135 A DU R 1 8/8/2023 1 0 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 167-071-007 5310 ALLISON LN, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 MA22157 A DU R 1 8/29/2023 1 0 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 182-321-017 4301 RIVERVIEW DR, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 MA22159 A DU R 1 9/8/2023 1 0 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 179-251-016 3638 WALLACE ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 MA22161 A DU R 1 1/11/2023 1 0 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 179-032-021 5898 SAMANTHA PL, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 MA22164 A DU R 1 9/8/2023 1 0 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 181-071-002 3889 RUBIDOUX BLVD, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 MA22165 A DU R 1 9/8/2023 1 0 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 182-262-014 5928 DE LA VISTA, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 MA22167 A DU R 1 9/8/2023 1 0 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 178-211-016 5672 NEWTON ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 MA22168 A DU R 1 9/8/2023 1 0 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 178-192-019 5718 29TH ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 MA22169 A DU R 1 3/28/2023 1 0 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 179-032-008 5862 ANTONIA PL, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 MA22171 A DU R 1 2/8/2023 1 0 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 178-211-016 5728 New ton ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 MA22172 A DU R 1 2/15/2023 1 0 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 179-281-007 5255 35TH ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 MA22173 A DU R 1 2/8/2023 1 0 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 177-080-008 6552 34TH ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 MA22177 A DU R 1 2/10/2023 1 0 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 160-187-001 11580 NIAGARA DR, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 91752 MA22181 A DU R 1 8/18/2023 1 0 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 161-121-004 5675 MARLATT ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 91752 MA22183 A DU R 1 3/10/2023 1 0 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 171-260-003 8335 STONEWOOD LN, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 MA22192 A DU R 1 3/21/2023 1 0 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 157-070-010 11371 64TH ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 91752 MA22209 A DU R 1 3/15/2023 1 0 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 169-160-008 4456 AVON ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 MA22227 A DU R 1 8/23/2023 1 0 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 159-061-018 4785 TROTH ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 91752 MA22240 A DU R 1 4/4/2023 1 0 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 169-120-025 4367 AVON ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 MA22263 A DU R 1 9/13/2023 1 0 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 167-380-002 9926 WOODBRIDGE LN, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 MA22268 A DU R 1 8/2/2023 1 0 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 160-171-039 11180 BIG DIPPER DR, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 91752 MA22305 A DU R 1 3/6/2023 1 0 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 160-210-072 6096 Ocasa DR, JURUPA VALLEY, CA MA22315 A DU R 1 10/30/2023 1 0 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 170-050-005 3852 LINDSAY ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 MA22348 A DU R 1 6/22/2023 1 0 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 159-090-017 4775 BAIN ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 91752 MA22350 A DU R 1 10/30/2023 1 0 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 166-443-011 8580 BROOKFIELD DR, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 MA23009 A DU R 1 11/1/2023 1 0 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 169-203-023 4490 PEDLEY RD, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 MA23107 A DU R 1 5/15/2023 1 0 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 162-062-005 5511 BEACH ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 MA23134 A DU R 1 8/22/2023 1 0 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 167-121-014 4938 RUTILE ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 MA23239 A DU R 1 9/15/2023 1 0 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 160-132-015 11066 PALA PL, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 91752 MA23250 A DU R 1 10/30/2023 1 0 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 171-072-021 4105 Pyrite St MA23016 A DU R 1 12/12/2023 1 0 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 167-090-224 9825 53rd St MA23099 A DU R 1 11/15/2023 1 0 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 156-274-010 10486 LATOUR LN, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 91752 B22-002777 A DU R 0 1 2/17/2023 1 0 1 NONE Y SCAG Projections 163-060-002 6316 COREY ST, #1/2, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B23-000050 A DU R 0 1 11/14/2023 1 0 1 NONE Y SCAG Projections 174-301-005 6917 37TH ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B23-002138 A DU R 0 1 11/21/2023 1 0 1 NONE Y SCAG Projections 157-102-030 6420 LORENA AVE, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 91752 B23-000046 A DU R 0 1 4/27/2023 1 0 1 NONE Y SCAG Projections 159-231-003 10667 JURUPA RD, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 91752 B22-002234 A DU R 0 1 2/17/2023 1 0 1 NONE Y SCAG Projections 160-120-062 11548 ANTIGUA DR, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 91752 B21-000893 A DU R 0 1 11/15/2023 1 0 1 NONE Y SCAG Projections 161-082-010 10411 56TH ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 91752 B22-003569 A DU R 0 1 5/2/2023 1 0 1 NONE Y SCAG Projections 162-122-009 5667 BEACH ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-003265 A DU R 0 1 3/9/2023 1 0 1 NONE Y SCAG Projections 162-141-023 9652 56TH ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B23-001214 A DU R 0 1 10/31/2023 1 0 1 NONE Y SCAG Projections 163-331-044 8019 HAMPTON CT, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B23-001542 A DU R 0 1 9/29/2023 1 0 1 NONE Y SCAG Projections 165-232-011 6074 HORSE CA NY ON RD, JURUPA V A LLEY , CA 92509 B23-000897 A DU R 0 1 9/1/2023 1 0 1 NONE Y SCAG Projections 165-282-010 8758 CHIFNEY LN, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B23-000788 A DU R 0 1 6/15/2023 1 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 166-421-013 8207 TAMARIND LN., JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B23-001660 A DU R 0 1 10/31/2023 1 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 167-050-004 5142 STEVE AVE, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B21-002420 A DU R 0 1 4/12/2023 1 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 169-022-010 3884 KENNETH ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B23-000795 A DU R 0 1 6/21/2023 1 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 173-191-011 3077 VINTAGE PL, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B23-001558 A DU R 0 1 10/16/2023 1 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 174-310-001 3510 NOVAK ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B21-001165 A DU R 0 1 5/23/2023 1 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 177-203-001 3192 LAUREL DR, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-002036 A DU R 0 1 11/30/2023 1 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 178-212-021 2862 MARIE DR, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B23-001887 A DU R 0 1 11/13/2023 1 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 181-101-002 3901 WALLACE ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-002626 A DU R 0 1 1/6/2023 1 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 182-082-005 4110 ESTRADA DR, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B23-001351 A DU R 0 1 10/13/2023 1 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 182-321-006 4215 RIVERVIEW DR, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B23-001380 A DU R 0 1 9/21/2023 1 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 182-432-003 4584 PINTO ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B23-001378 A DU R 0 1 9/15/2023 1 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 182-472-014 6898 WOODMERE DR, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-000269 A DU R 0 1 6/23/2023 1 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 171-102-017 8556 WILD PONY AVE, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B21-000260 A DU R 0 0 1 4/6/2023 1 NONE Y SCAG Projections 167-132-007 5050 NEWCASTLE ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B21-000697 A DU R 0 0 1 11/15/2023 1 NONE Y SCAG Projections 177-070-023 3567 MANOR DR, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B20-001552 A DU R 0 0 1 3/15/2023 1 NONE Y SCAG Projections 160-111-030 11567 HUMBER DR, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 91752 B20-001662 A DU R 0 0 1 3/16/2023 1 NONE Y SCAG Projections 159-061-018 10645 48TH ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 91752 B23-001057 A DU R 0 1 9/18/2023 1 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 159-282-009 5312 MARLATT ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 91752 B22-003477 A DU R 0 1 3/21/2023 1 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 160-072-022 5722 PTOLEMY WAY, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 91752 B22-003137 A DU R 0 1 8/28/2023 1 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 160-081-053 5223 CONCHA DR, JURUPA V A LLEY , CA 91752 B22-001938 A DU R 0 1 2/7/2023 1 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 160-142-025 5272 RIGEL WAY, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 91752 B22-001104 A DU R 0 1 4/20/2023 1 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 160-152-027 5432 GALAXY LN, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 91752 B23-000998 A DU R 0 1 7/31/2023 1 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 160-162-044 6014 EARTH ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 91752 B23-001609 A DU R 0 1 11/9/2023 1 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 160-187-001 6039 AURORA AVE, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 91752 B22-003686 A DU R 0 1 6/29/2023 1 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 160-331-019 11461 CORTE SOQUEL, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 91752 B22-002335 A DU R 0 1 2/16/2023 1 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 161-121-004 5677 MARLATT ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 91752 B23-000650 A DU R 0 1 8/16/2023 1 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 161-311-017 6173 TROTH ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 91752 B23-001024 A DU R 0 1 2/17/2023 1 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 162-051-003 5461 RUTILE ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-003287 A DU R 0 1 6/2/2023 1 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 162-082-026 9668 55TH ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-000735 A DU R 0 1 6/29/2023 1 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 162-122-009 5669 BEACH ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-002233 A DU R 0 1 9/29/2023 1 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 163-060-002 6318 COREY ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-002783 A DU R 0 1 11/2/2023 1 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 163-130-032 6564 BAKER ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA B23-000402 A DU R 0 1 4/21/2023 1 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 165-092-004 5690 PEDLEY RD, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B23-001072 A DU R 0 1 3/3/2023 1 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 165-171-005 6045 COLLINS ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B23-002114 A DU R 0 1 5/4/2023 1 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 165-182-003 8863 MAIN ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA B22-003754 A DU R 0 1 2/7/2023 1 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 165-232-011 6076 HORSE CA NY ON RD, JURUPA V A LLEY , CA 92509 B22-003264 A DU R 0 1 9/19/2023 1 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 166-142-020 7893 PAISANO WAY, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-001235 A DU R 0 1 6/9/2023 1 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 166-451-017 8419 BROOKFIELD DR, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B23-000089 A DU R 0 1 7/25/2023 1 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 167-071-007 5312 ALLISON LN, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B23-000087 A DU R 0 1 9/21/2023 1 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 167-071-008 5280 ALLISON LN, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-002054 A DU R 0 1 9/11/2023 1 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 167-131-029 9734 WEBB ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-002120 A DU R 0 1 3/10/2023 1 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 167-200-048 9593 53RD ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B23-000201 A DU R 0 1 10/25/2023 1 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 167-380-002 9928 WOODBRIDGE LN, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B23-000870 A DU R 0 1 1/3/2023 1 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 169-110-017 9163 JOHNSON CT, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-003425 A DU R 0 1 6/6/2023 1 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 169-130-024 9137 GALENA ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-001995 A DU R 0 1 2/22/2023 1 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 169-231-001 8992 GALENA ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-001825 A DU R 0 1 12/8/2023 1 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 170-180-024 4029 HUNTER ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-003529 A DU R 0 1 9/22/2023 1 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 171-121-024 8593 GALENA ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B21-002375 A DU R 0 1 6/5/2023 1 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 171-180-005 4350 TYROLITE ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B20-001972 A DU R 0 1 12/28/2023 1 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 171-260-003 8337 STONEWOOD LN, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-003348 A DU R 0 1 10/17/2023 1 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 171-261-002 4277 VERNON AVE, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B21-000804 A DU R 0 1 12/28/2023 1 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 173-060-002 3748 CONNING ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-002971 A DU R 0 1 4/27/2023 1 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 174-241-024 7078 36TH ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA B22-003440 A DU R 0 1 7/13/2023 1 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 174-310-026 3585 ALTHEA WAY, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-003483 A DU R 0 1 5/22/2023 1 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 175-262-002 2152 SANDRA DR, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-003399 A DU R 0 1 12/28/2023 1 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 177-301-009 6670 30TH ST ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B23-000333 A DU R 0 1 6/16/2023 1 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 178-113-010 5318 24TH ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA B23-001484 A DU R 0 1 12/28/2023 1 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 178-211-016 5672 NEWTON ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B23-000324 A DU R 0 1 4/7/2023 1 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 179-103-001 3436 PONTIAC AVE, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-003371 A DU R 0 1 4/28/2023 1 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 179-180-011 5419 34TH ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B23-000587 A DU R 0 1 4/14/2023 1 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 179-241-039 3454 WALLACE ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B21-001223 A DU R 0 1 12/28/2023 1 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 179-281-007 5253 35TH ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B23-000329 A DU R 0 1 7/3/2023 1 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 179-282-017 5291 36TH ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-003126 A DU R 0 1 1/20/2023 1 0 NONE Y SCAG Projections 169-120-014 4316 GLEN ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B21-002779 A DU R 0 0 1 4/3/2023 1 NONE Y SCAG Projections 177-352-029 2965 DONNER WAY, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B21-002749 A DU R 0 0 1 5/30/2023 1 NONE Y SCAG Projections 160-372-001 11394 CAMINO MIRAMONTES, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 91752 B21-000732 A DU R 0 0 1 3/16/2023 1 NONE Y SCAG Projections 167-071-007 5312 ALLISON LN, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B23-000087 A DU R 0 0 1 12/27/2023 1 NONE Y SCAG Projections 171-102-013 8498 WILD PONY DR, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-000610 A DU R 0 0 1 11/15/2023 1 NONE Y SCAG Projections 165-111-017 6088 FELSPAR ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-002102 A DU R 0 0 1 9/5/2023 1 NONE Y SCAG Projections 183-320-012 7336 LAKESIDE DR, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-001618 A DU R 0 0 1 11/30/2023 1 NONE Y SCAG Projections 159-151-016 4917 TROTH ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 91752 B22-002019 A DU R 0 0 1 11/3/2023 1 NONE Y SCAG Projections 161-311-017 6173 TROTH ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 91752 B23-001024 A DU R 0 0 1 10/6/2023 1 NONE Y SCAG Projections 169-231-001 8990 GALENA ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-001824 SFD O 0 1 2/13/2023 1 0 NONE Y 181-101-002 3903 WALLACE ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B21-001164 SFD O 0 1 5/23/2023 1 0 NONE Y 185-022-012 5429 CAMINO REAL, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B21-003035 SFD O 0 1 5/23/2023 1 0 NONE Y 000-000-002 8208 WOODROSE ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B23-002178 SFD O 0 1 11/2/2023 1 0 NONE Y 000-000-002 8404 PERADA ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B23-002180 SFD O 0 1 11/2/2023 1 0 NONE Y 000-000-002 8184 WOODROSE ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B23-002182 SFD O 0 1 11/2/2023 1 0 NONE Y 000-000-002 8392 PERADA ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B23-002183 SFD O 0 1 11/2/2023 1 0 NONE Y 000-000-002 8362 PERADA ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B23-002184 SFD O 0 1 11/2/2023 1 0 NONE Y 000-000-002 8379 PERADA ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B23-002185 SFD O 0 1 11/2/2023 1 0 NONE Y 000-000-002 8380 PERADA ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B23-002186 SFD O 0 1 11/2/2023 1 0 NONE Y 000-000-002 8403 PERADA ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B23-002187 SFD O 0 1 11/2/2023 1 0 NONE Y 000-000-002 8350 PERADA ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B23-002188 SFD O 0 1 11/2/2023 1 0 NONE Y 000-000-002 8391 PERADA ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B23-002189 SFD O 0 1 11/2/2023 1 0 NONE Y 000-000-002 8172 WOODROSE ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B23-002191 SFD O 0 1 11/2/2023 1 0 NONE Y 000-000-002 8159 WOODROSE ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B23-002192 SFD O 0 1 11/2/2023 1 0 NONE Y 000-000-002 8196 WOODROSE ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B23-002193 SFD O 0 1 11/2/2023 1 0 NONE Y 000-000-002 8207 WOODROSE ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B23-002194 SFD O 0 1 11/2/2023 1 0 NONE Y 000-000-002 8177 WOODROSE ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B23-002195 SFD O 0 1 11/2/2023 1 0 NONE Y 000-000-002 8261 WOODROSE ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B23-002353 SFD O 0 1 11/27/2023 1 0 NONE Y 000-000-002 8220 WOODROSE ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B23-002354 SFD O 0 1 11/27/2023 1 0 NONE Y 000-000-002 8244 WOODROSE ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B23-002355 SFD O 0 1 11/27/2023 1 0 NONE Y 000-000-002 8231 WOODROSE ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B23-002356 SFD O 0 1 11/27/2023 1 0 NONE Y 000-000-002 8256 WOODROSE ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B23-002357 SFD O 0 1 11/27/2023 1 0 NONE Y 000-000-002 8249 WOODROSE ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B23-002358 SFD O 0 1 11/27/2023 1 0 NONE Y 000-000-002 8232 WOODROSE ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B23-002359 SFD O 0 1 11/27/2023 1 0 NONE Y 000-000-002 8481 PERADA ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B23-002360 SFD O 0 1 11/27/2023 1 0 NONE Y 000-000-002 8464 PERADA ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B23-002361 SFD O 0 1 11/27/2023 1 0 NONE Y 000-000-002 8433 PERADA ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B23-002362 SFD O 0 1 11/27/2023 1 0 NONE Y 000-000-002 8451 PERADA ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B23-002363 SFD O 0 1 11/27/2023 1 0 NONE Y 000-000-002 8452 PERADA ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B23-002364 SFD O 0 1 11/27/2023 1 0 NONE Y 000-000-002 8476 PERADA ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B23-002365 SFD O 0 1 11/27/2023 1 0 NONE Y 000-000-002 8469 PERADA ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B23-002366 SFD O 0 1 11/27/2023 1 0 NONE Y 000-000-002 8428 PERADA ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B23-002367 SFD O 0 1 11/27/2023 1 0 NONE Y 159-030-007 4653 DODD ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 91752 B21-002662 SFD O 0 1 12/5/2023 1 0 NONE Y 159-112-014 10544 48TH ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 91752 B23-001980 SFD O 0 1 12/13/2023 1 0 NONE Y 162-121-012 5665 RUTILE ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-000935 SFD O 0 1 1/9/2023 1 0 NONE Y 162-190-009 5946 BEACH ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B21-002073 SFD O 0 1 10/27/2023 1 0 NONE Y 162-320-004 9629 VENETIAN WAY, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-003553 SFD O 0 1 7/24/2023 1 0 NONE Y 162-330-009 6442 ARDENNES ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-001716 SFD O 0 1 2/22/2023 1 0 NONE Y 162-331-001 6455 ARDENNES ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-001727 SFD O 0 1 2/22/2023 1 0 NONE Y 167-171-006 5159 BEA CH ST, JURUPA V A LLEY , CA B22-001340 SFD O 0 1 12/20/2023 1 0 NONE Y 179-350-007 3452 SMITH ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-003040 SFD O 0 1 6/6/2023 1 0 NONE Y 179-350-008 3476 SMITH ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-003035 SFD O 0 1 6/6/2023 1 0 NONE Y 179-350-009 3500 SMITH ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-003041 SFD O 0 1 6/6/2023 1 0 NONE Y 179-350-010 3524 SMITH ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-003036 SFD O 0 1 6/6/2023 1 0 NONE Y 179-350-011 3548 SMITH ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-003022 SFD O 0 1 6/6/2023 1 0 NONE Y 179-350-012 3572 SMITH ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-003019 SFD O 0 1 6/6/2023 1 0 NONE Y 179-350-016 3501 PALMWOOD DR, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-003023 SFD O 0 1 6/6/2023 1 0 NONE Y 179-350-017 3477 PALMWOOD DR, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-003028 SFD O 0 1 6/6/2023 1 0 NONE Y 179-350-018 3453 PALMWWOD DR, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-003024 SFD O 0 1 6/6/2023 1 0 NONE Y 179-350-019 3430 PALMWOOD DR, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-003029 SFD O 0 1 6/6/2023 1 0 NONE Y 179-350-020 3454 PALMWOOD DR, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-003025 SFD O 0 1 6/6/2023 1 0 NONE Y 179-350-021 3478 PALMWOOD DR, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-003030 SFD O 0 1 6/6/2023 1 0 NONE Y 179-350-022 3502 PALMWOOD DR, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-003031 SFD O 0 1 6/6/2023 1 0 NONE Y 179-350-023 3526 PALMWOOD DR, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-003026 SFD O 0 1 6/6/2023 1 0 NONE Y 179-350-024 3550 PALMWOOD DR, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-003020 SFD O 0 1 6/6/2023 1 0 NONE Y 181-230-044 5555 RIO RD, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-001451 SFD O 0 1 12/1/2023 1 0 NONE Y 159-322-004 10429 54TH ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 91752 B21-000205 SFD O 0 0 1 2/21/2023 1 NONE Y 185-350-040 7330 LIVE OAK DR, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B21-000332 SFD O 0 0 1 11/2/2023 1 NONE Y 157-150-016 6597 WILLIAM AVE, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 91752 B21-000590 SFD O 0 0 1 1/27/2023 1 NONE Y 177-440-035 6378 BIG BEND WAY, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B21-001484 SFD O 0 0 1 4/13/2023 1 NONE Y 177-440-036 6370 BIG BEND WAY, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B21-001485 SFD O 0 0 1 4/13/2023 1 NONE Y 177-440-037 6362 BIG BEND WAY, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B21-001486 SFD O 0 0 1 4/13/2023 1 NONE Y 177-440-038 6354 BIG BEND WAY, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B21-001487 SFD O 0 0 1 4/13/2023 1 NONE Y 177-440-056 6353 BIG BEND WAY, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B21-001488 SFD O 0 0 1 4/12/2023 1 NONE Y 177-440-057 6361 BIG BEND WAY, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B21-001489 SFD O 0 0 1 4/12/2023 1 NONE Y 177-440-058 6369 BIG BEND WAY, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B21-001490 SFD O 0 0 1 4/12/2023 1 NONE Y 177-440-059 6377 BIG BEND WAY, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B21-001491 SFD O 0 0 1 4/12/2023 1 NONE Y 177-401-029 2964 WINTER PARK AVE, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B21-001520 SFD O 0 0 1 3/6/2023 1 NONE Y 177-401-030 2972 WINTER PARK AVE, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B21-001521 SFD O 0 0 1 2/3/2023 1 NONE Y 177-410-015 2988 WINTER PARK, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B21-001522 SFD O 0 0 1 2/3/2023 1 NONE Y 177-410-016 2996 WINTER PARK AVE, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B21-001523 SFD O 0 0 1 3/6/2023 1 NONE Y 177-410-017 3004 WINTER PARK AVE, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B21-001524 SFD O 0 0 1 2/3/2023 1 NONE Y 177-410-018 3012 WINTER PARK AVE, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B21-001525 SFD O 0 0 1 3/6/2023 1 NONE Y 177-410-019 3020 WINTER PARK AVE, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B21-001526 SFD O 0 0 1 2/3/2023 1 NONE Y 177-440-045 6298 BIG BEND WAY, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B21-001528 SFD O 0 0 1 8/21/2023 1 NONE Y 177-440-046 6290 BIG BEND WAY, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B21-001529 SFD O 0 0 1 8/21/2023 1 NONE Y 177-440-047 6282 BIG BEND WAY, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B21-001530 SFD O 0 0 1 8/21/2023 1 NONE Y 177-440-048 6283 BIG BEND WAY, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B21-001531 SFD O 0 0 1 8/21/2023 1 NONE Y 177-440-049 6289 BIG BEND WAY, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B21-001532 SFD O 0 0 1 8/22/2023 1 NONE Y 177-440-051 6305 BIG BEND WAY, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B21-001534 SFD O 0 0 1 8/21/2023 1 NONE Y 177-440-039 6346 BIG BEND WAY, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B21-001535 SFD O 0 0 1 8/14/2023 1 NONE Y 177-440-042 6322 BIG BEND WAY, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B21-001538 SFD O 0 0 1 10/12/2023 1 NONE Y 177-440-052 6321 BIG BEND WAY, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B21-001540 SFD O 0 0 1 8/14/2023 1 NONE Y 177-440-053 6329 BIG BEND WAY, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B21-001541 SFD O 0 0 1 10/12/2023 1 NONE Y 177-440-054 6337 BIG BEND WAY, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B21-001542 SFD O 0 0 1 8/14/2023 1 NONE Y 177-440-055 6345 BIG BEND WAY, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B21-001543 SFD O 0 0 1 8/14/2023 1 NONE Y 177-440-021 6292 GLENWOOD SPRINGS DR, JURUPA V A LLEY , CA 92509 B21-001555 SFD O 0 0 1 3/6/2023 1 NONE Y
177-440-022 6284 GLENWOOD SPRINGS DR, JURUPA V A LLEY , CA 92509 B21-001556 SFD O 0 0 1 3/6/2023 1 NONE Y
177-440-023 6276 GLENWOOD SPRINGS DR, JURUPA V A LLEY , CA 92509 B21-001557 SFD O 0 0 1 3/6/2023 1 NONE Y
177-440-024 6267 GLENWOOD SPRINGS DR, JURUPA V A LLEY , CA 92509 B21-001558 SFD O 0 0 1 3/6/2023 1 NONE Y
177-440-025 6275 GLENWOOD SPRINGS DR, JURUPA V A LLEY , CA 92509 B21-001559 SFD O 0 0 1 3/6/2023 1 NONE Y
177-440-026 6283 GLENWOOD SPRINGS DR, JURUPA V A LLEY , CA 92509 B21-001560 SFD O 0 0 1 3/6/2023 1 NONE Y
177-440-027 6291 GLENWOOD SPRINGS DR, JURUPA V A LLEY , CA 92509 B21-001561 SFD O 0 0 1 3/6/2023 1 NONE Y
177-440-028 6299 GLENWOOD SPRINGS CT, JURUPA V A LLEY , CA 92509 B21-001562 SFD O 0 0 1 3/6/2023 1 NONE Y
177-440-015 3157 MOAB CT, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B21-001565 SFD O 0 0 1 1/23/2023 1 NONE Y 165-292-011 9031 BLACK THORN ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B21-002231 SFD O 0 0 1 8/9/2023 1 NONE Y 165-291-006 9068 BLACK THORN ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B21-002233 SFD O 0 0 1 4/17/2023 1 NONE Y 165-292-002 5938 WHITE WILLOW LN, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B21-002237 SFD O 0 0 1 4/13/2023 1 NONE Y 165-290-004 5951 WHITE WILLOW LN, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B21-002240 SFD O 0 0 1 3/23/2023 1 NONE Y 165-290-005 5939 WHITE WILLOW LN, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B21-002241 SFD O 0 0 1 3/23/2023 1 NONE Y 162-323-003 9547 RA NCHO JURUPA DR, JURUPA V A LLEY , CA 92509 B21-002454 SFD O 0 0 1 1/17/2023 1 NONE Y 170-050-005 3852 LINDSAY ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B21-002704 SFD O 0 0 1 9/19/2023 1 NONE Y 159-191-002 10710 50TH ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 91752 B21-002945 SFD O 0 0 1 9/19/2023 1 NONE Y 162-320-018 9461 VENETIAN WAY, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-000094 SFD O 0 0 1 1/23/2023 1 NONE Y 162-320-019 9449 VENETIAN WAY, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-000095 SFD O 0 0 1 1/23/2023 1 NONE Y 162-320-020 9437 VENETIAN WAY, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-000096 SFD O 0 0 1 1/23/2023 1 NONE Y 162-320-021 9425 VENETIAN WAY, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-000097 SFD O 0 0 1 1/23/2023 1 NONE Y 000-000-002 8528 BROTCHIE LN, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-000339 SFD O 0 0 1 5/30/2023 1 NONE Y 000-000-002 8552 BROTCHIE LN, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-000342 SFD O 0 0 1 5/30/2023 1 NONE Y 000-000-002 8564 BROTCHIE LN, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-000343 SFD O 0 0 1 7/7/2023 1 NONE Y 000-000-002 4243 HOBBS CT, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-000345 SFD O 0 0 1 7/7/2023 1 NONE Y Density Bonus
1 Unit Types Affordability by Household Incomes - Completed Entitlement Affordability by Household Incomes - Building Permits Affordability by Household Incomes - Certificates of Occupancy 4 7 10
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
Housing with Financial Assistance
and/or Deed Restrictions Demolished/Destroyed UnitsProject Identifier Annual Building Activity Report Summary - New Construction, Entitled, Permits and Completed Units Jurisdiction Jurupa Valley ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Reporting Year 2023 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas Planning Period 6th Cycle 10/15/2021 - 10/15/2029
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
000-000-002 4231 HOBBS CT, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-000346 SFD O 0 0 1 7/7/2023 1 NONE Y 171-290-018 4219 HOBBS CT, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-000349 SFD O 0 0 1 7/7/2023 1 NONE Y 000-000-002 4230 HOBBS CT, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-000351 SFD O 0 0 1 7/7/2023 1 NONE Y 162-320-027 6274 ARDENNES ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-000828 SFD O 0 0 1 3/16/2023 1 NONE Y 162-321-005 6287 ARDENNES ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-000829 SFD O 0 0 1 3/17/2023 1 NONE Y 162-321-006 6275 ARDENNES ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-000830 SFD O 0 0 1 3/16/2023 1 NONE Y 000-000-002 6322 ARDENNES ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-000831 SFD O 0 0 1 3/17/2023 1 NONE Y 162-320-029 6298 ARDENNES ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-000832 SFD O 0 0 1 3/17/2023 1 NONE Y 162-321-003 9451 RA NCHO JURUPA DR, JURUPA V A LLEY , CA 92509 B22-000833 SFD O 0 0 1 3/20/2023 1 NONE Y 162-331-009 6347 ARDENNES ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-000834 SFD O 0 0 1 7/28/2023 1 NONE Y 162-331-006 6383 ARDENNES ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-000835 SFD O 0 0 1 8/29/2023 1 NONE Y 162-330-003 6370 ARDENNES ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-000836 SFD O 0 0 1 8/8/2023 1 NONE Y 162-320-030 6310 ARDENNES ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-000859 SFD O 0 0 1 3/17/2023 1 NONE Y 162-321-002 9439 RA NCHO JURUPA DR, JURUPA V A LLEY , CA 92509 B22-000860 SFD O 0 0 1 3/20/2023 1 NONE Y 162-331-008 6359 ARDENNES ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-000861 SFD O 0 0 1 10/10/2023 1 NONE Y 162-330-001 6346 ARDENNES ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-000862 SFD O 0 0 1 8/8/2023 1 NONE Y 162-320-028 6286 ARDENNES ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-000865 SFD O 0 0 1 3/17/2023 1 NONE Y 162-321-004 6299 ARDENNES ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-000866 SFD O 0 0 1 3/20/2023 1 NONE Y 162-321-001 9427 RA NCHO JURUPA DR, JURUPA V A LLEY , CA 92509 B22-000867 SFD O 0 0 1 3/20/2023 1 NONE Y 162-330-002 6358 ARDENNES ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-000868 SFD O 0 0 1 8/8/2023 1 NONE Y 162-331-007 6371 ARDENNES ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-000869 SFD O 0 0 1 7/28/2023 1 NONE Y 178-242-034 5310 EL RIO AVE, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-001236 SFD O 0 0 1 5/4/2023 1 NONE Y 177-450-001 3032 WINTER PARK AVE, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-001291 SFD O 0 0 1 4/11/2023 1 NONE Y 177-450-003 3056 WINTER PARK AVE, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-001294 SFD O 0 0 1 4/11/2023 1 NONE Y 177-450-032 3063 WINTER PARK AVE, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-001295 SFD O 0 0 1 4/12/2023 1 NONE Y 177-450-034 3039 WINTER PARK AVE, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-001296 SFD O 0 0 1 4/12/2023 1 NONE Y 177-450-010 3140 WINTER PARK AVE, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-001301 SFD O 0 0 1 7/21/2023 1 NONE Y 177-450-033 3051 WINTER PARK AVE, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-001306 SFD O 0 0 1 4/12/2023 1 NONE Y 177-450-009 3128 WINTER PARK AVE, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-001310 SFD O 0 0 1 7/21/2023 1 NONE Y 177-450-013 3176 WINTER PARK AVE, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-001311 SFD O 0 0 1 7/21/2023 1 NONE Y 177-450-024 3165 WINTER PARK AVE, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-001312 SFD O 0 0 1 7/21/2023 1 NONE Y 177-450-026 3141 WINTER PARK AVE, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-001313 SFD O 0 0 1 7/21/2023 1 NONE Y 177-450-002 3044 WINTER PARK AVE, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-001317 SFD O 0 0 1 4/11/2023 1 NONE Y 177-450-004 3068 WINTER PARK AVE, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-001318 SFD O 0 0 1 4/11/2023 1 NONE Y 177-450-031 3075 WINTER PARK AVE, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-001319 SFD O 0 0 1 4/12/2023 1 NONE Y 177-450-011 3152 WINTER PARK AVE, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-001323 SFD O 0 0 1 7/21/2023 1 NONE Y 000-000-002 3164 WINTER PARK AVE, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-001324 SFD O 0 0 1 7/20/2023 1 NONE Y 177-450-023 3183 WINTER PARK AVE, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-001325 SFD O 0 0 1 7/21/2023 1 NONE Y 177-450-025 3153 WINTER PARK AVE, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-001326 SFD O 0 0 1 7/20/2023 1 NONE Y 165-290-006 5927 WHITE WILLOW LN, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-001383 SFD O 0 0 1 3/23/2023 1 NONE Y 165-292-004 9090 59TH ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-001386 SFD O 0 0 1 3/23/2023 1 NONE Y 165-292-005 9078 59TH ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-001387 SFD O 0 0 1 3/23/2023 1 NONE Y 165-292-006 9066 59TH ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-001388 SFD O 0 0 1 3/23/2023 1 NONE Y 162-325-007 6259 DONGOLA ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-001720 SFD O 0 0 1 12/8/2023 1 NONE Y 165-291-001 9093 60TH ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-002842 SFD O 0 0 1 7/13/2023 1 NONE Y 165-292-012 9019 BLACK THORN ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-002843 SFD O 0 0 1 10/12/2023 1 NONE Y 165-291-002 9081 60TH ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-002844 SFD O 0 0 1 7/12/2023 1 NONE Y 165-291-003 9069 60TH ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-002845 SFD O 0 0 1 7/10/2023 1 NONE Y 165-291-005 9056 BLACK THORN ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-002846 SFD O 0 0 1 7/10/2023 1 NONE Y 165-290-002 5975 WHITE WILLOW LN, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-002849 SFD O 0 0 1 7/11/2023 1 NONE Y 165-290-003 5963 WHITE WILLOW LN, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-002850 SFD O 0 0 1 7/11/2023 1 NONE Y 000-000-002 8408 BROTCHIE LN, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-002875 SFD O 0 0 1 7/19/2023 1 NONE Y 000-000-002 8444 BROTCHIE LN, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-002878 SFD O 0 0 1 7/19/2023 1 NONE Y 000-000-002 8456 BROTCHIE LN, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-002879 SFD O 0 0 1 7/25/2023 1 NONE Y 000-000-002 8468 BROTCHIE, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-002881 SFD O 0 0 1 7/19/2023 1 NONE Y 000-000-002 8492 BROTCHIE LN, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-002894 SFD O 0 0 1 7/19/2023 1 NONE Y 171-290-010 8516 BROTCHIE LN, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-002896 SFD O 0 0 1 8/22/2023 1 NONE Y 000-000-002 8431 BROTCHIE LN, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-002898 SFD O 0 0 1 7/19/2023 1 NONE Y 000-000-002 8419 BROTCHIE LN, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-002899 SFD O 0 0 1 10/3/2023 1 NONE Y 000-000-002 8407 BROTCHIE LN, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-002902 SFD O 0 0 1 7/13/2023 1 NONE Y 000-000-002 5437 46TH ST, Jurupa Valley, CA HB19-18386 SFD O 0 0 1 12/8/2023 1 NONE Y 181-101-041 3972 MENNES AVE, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B21-001848 SFD O 0 0 1 1/10/2023 1 NONE Y 162-170-001 5841 ASH ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-002516 SFD O 0 0 1 7/6/2023 1 NONE Y 162-051-003 5461 RUTILE ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-003287 A DU R 0 0 1 8/31/2023 1 NONE Y SCAG Projections 183-182-005 6835 CONDOR DR, JURUPA V A LLEY , CA 92509 B22-003050 A DU R 0 0 1 6/21/2023 1 NONE Y SCAG Projections 160-171-047 6169 SUNNY CIR, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 91752 B20-001924 A DU R 0 0 1 11/16/2023 1 1 NONE Y SCAG Projections 166-610-014 4756 MEADOWLAND DR, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B20-001774 A DU R 0 0 1 1/19/2023 1 1 NONE Y SCAG Projections 171-111-020 8433 45TH ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B20-001009 A DU R 0 0 1 7/25/2023 1 1 NONE Y SCAG Projections 165-112-011 6022 AZURITE ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B21-002411 A DU R 0 0 1 6/16/2023 1 1 NONE Y SCAG Projections 162-082-026 9668 55TH ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-000735 A DU R 0 0 1 12/4/2023 1 1 NONE Y SCAG Projections 160-143-030 5363 LUCRETIA AVE, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 91752 B22-002403 A DU R 0 0 1 8/30/2023 1 1 NONE Y SCAG Projections 166-451-017 8419 BROOKFIELD DR, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B23-000089 A DU R 0 0 1 7/14/2023 1 NONE Y SCAG Projections 160-120-062 11550 ANTIGUA DR, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 91752 B22-002627 A DU R 0 0 1 11/2/2023 1 NONE Y SCAG Projections 162-312-007 5874 TUMBLEWEED ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B21-002986 A DU R 0 0 1 7/14/2023 1 NONE Y SCAG Projections 181-112-010 5368 CAPARY RD, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B20-001738 A DU R 0 0 1 2/14/2023 1 NONE Y SCAG Projections 183-310-039 4732 VIAGGIO CIR, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-001038 A DU R 0 0 1 5/10/2023 1 NONE Y SCAG Projections 167-041-009 10115 PALOMINO AVE, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B20-001642 A DU R 0 0 1 3/1/2023 1 NONE Y SCAG Projections 159-322-004 10431 54TH ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 91752 B21-000206 A DU R 0 0 1 2/21/2023 1 NONE Y SCAG Projections 171-260-003 8337 STONEWOOD LN, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-003348 A DU R 0 0 1 10/6/2023 1 NONE Y SCAG Projections 160-131-023 11073 HAMAL AVE, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 91752 B21-002351 A DU R 0 0 1 3/7/2023 1 NONE Y SCAG Projections 157-150-018 6541 WILLIAM AVE, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 91752 B21-000593 A DU R 0 0 1 7/11/2023 1 NONE Y SCAG Projections 182-262-025 6053 VISTA DE ORO, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B21-002766 A DU R 0 0 1 2/2/2023 1 NONE Y SCAG Projections 179-112-014 3705 PIONEER DR, JURUPA V A LLEY , CA B21-002673 A DU R 0 0 1 6/8/2023 1 NONE Y SCAG Projections 171-121-024 8593 GALENA ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B21-002375 A DU R 0 0 1 9/12/2023 1 NONE Y SCAG Projections 167-212-001 5396 BEACH ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B20-001719 A DU R 0 0 1 8/31/2023 1 NONE Y SCAG Projections 159-311-007 10629 54TH ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 91752 B22-001956 A DU R 0 0 1 3/30/2023 1 NONE Y SCAG Projections 157-181-009 6677 FRANK AVE, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 91752 B20-000710 A DU R 0 0 1 5/15/2023 1 NONE Y SCAG Projections 177-272-007 2946 BIXBY DR, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B20-001761 A DU R 0 0 1 4/18/2023 1 NONE Y SCAG Projections 183-140-012 4485 FAIRBANKS AVE, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B21-002590 A DU R 0 0 1 1/27/2023 1 NONE Y SCAG Projections 165-070-004 9052 56TH ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-001563 A DU R 0 0 1 11/15/2023 1 NONE Y SCAG Projections 174-301-005 6917 37TH ST, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 92509 B22-001614 A DU R 0 0 1 11/30/2023 1 NONE Y SCAG Projections 156-274-010 10486 LATOUR LN, JURUPA VALLEY, CA 91752 B22-002577 A DU R 0 0 1 7/20/2023 1 NONE Y SCAG Projections 0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
Jurisdiction Jurupa Valley ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Reporting Year 2023 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Planning Period 6th Cycle 10/15/2021 - 10/15/2029
1 Projection Period 3 4
RHNA Allocation by
Income Level
Projection Period -
06/30/2021-
10/14/2021
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Total Units to Date (all years)
Total Remaining
RHNA by Income
Level
Deed Restricted - - - - - - - - - - Non-Deed Restricted - - 9 16 - - - - - - Deed Restricted - - - - - - - - - - Non-Deed Restricted - - 15 25 - - - - - - Deed Restricted - - - - - - - - - - Non-Deed Restricted - - 16 25 - - - - - - Above Moderate 1,810 78 89 184 62 - - - - - - 413 1,397 4,497
78 89 224 128 - - - - - - 519 3,978 5 6 7
Extremely low-Income
Need 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Total Units to Date
Total Units
Remaining
604 - - 11 - - - - - - 11 593 VLI Deed Restricted
VLI Non Deed Restricted
Please note: The APR form can only display data for one planning period. To view progress for a different planning period, you may login to HCD's online APR system, or contact HCD staff at [email protected].
690
25 This table is auto-populated once you enter your jurisdiction name and current year data. Past year information comes from previous APRs.
41 Moderate
1,207
749
731
Please contact HCD if your data is different than the material supplied here 40 2
Table B
Regional Housing Needs Allocation Progress
Permitted Units Issued by Affordability
1,182
709
Please note: For the last year of the 5th cycle, Table B will only include units that were permitted during the portion of the year that was in the 5th cycle. For the first year of the 6th cycle, Table B will only include units that were permitted since the start of the planning period. Projection Period units are in a separate column.

Total RHNA
Total Units
Income Level
Very Low
Low
Extremely Low-Income Units*
Note: units serving extremely low-income households are included in the very low-income RHNA progress and must be reported as very low-income units in section 7 of Table A2. They must also be reported in the extremely low-income category (section 13) in Table A2 to be counted as progress toward meeting the extremely low-income housing need determined pursuant to Government Code 65583(a)(1). *Extremely low-income houisng need determined pursuant to Government Code 65583(a)(1). Value in Section 5 is default value, assumed to be half of the very low-income RHNA. May be overwritten.

Progress toward extremely low-income housing need, as determined pursuant to Government Code 65583(a)(1).

Please Note: Table B does not currently contain data from Table F or Table F2 for prior years. You may login to the APR system to see Table B that contains this data.

Jurisdiction Jurupa Valley ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Reporting Year 2023 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Planning Period 6th Cycle 10/15/2021 - 10/15/2029
Date of Rezone Rezone Type
2 4 5 6 7 9 10 11
APN Street Address Project Name+
Local
Jurisdiction
Tracking ID+
Date of Rezone Very Low-
Income Low-Income Moderate-Income Above Moderate-
Income
Rezone Type Parcel Size
(Acres)
General Plan
Designation Zoning Minimum
Density Allowed
Maximum
Density Allowed
Realistic
Capacity Vacant/Nonvacant Description of Existing
Uses
40 338
165-080-005 5a 7/27/2023 6 No Net Loss 4.62 LDR HHDR 20 du/ac 25 du/ac 80 Vacant 165-140-029 5a 7/27/2023 6 No Net Loss 3.51 CR HHDR 21 du/ac 26 du/ac 61 Vacant 165-140-030 5a 7/27/2023 6 No Net Loss 1.57 CR HHDR 22 du/ac 27 du/ac 27 Vacant 165-140-007 5a 7/27/2023 6 No Net Loss 1.56 CR HHDR 23 du/ac 28 du/ac 27 Vacant 165-140-004 5a 7/27/2023 6 No Net Loss 0.38 CR HHDR 24 du/ac 29 du/ac 7 Vacant 165-140-008 5a 7/27/2023 6 No Net Loss 4.16 CR HHDR 25 du/ac 30 du/ac 73 Vacant 163-400-042 14a 7/27/2023 4 No Net Loss 3.63 M-SC HHDR 26 du/ac 31 du/ac 63 Vacant Note: "+" indicates an optional field
Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below
83 Project Identifier RHNA Shortfall by Household Income Category Sites Description 1 Sites Identified or Rezoned to Accommodate Shortfall Housing Need and No Net-Loss Law Table C
Jurisdiction Jurupa Valley
Reporting Year 2023 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
1 2 3 4
Name of Program Objective Timeframe in H.E Status of Program Implementation HE 1.1.1
General Plan and Zoning Amendments.

Amend General Plan and Zoning
Ordinance and Map to designate 69.2
additional acres for residential use at
HHDR density (up to 25 du/acre) to help
meet Lower Income RHNA needs;
address all by- right requirements
pursuant to Government Code section
65583.2, subdivisions (h) and (i); and
amend the Zoning Ordinance as
appropriate to be consistent with the
General Plan.

Initiate and adopt within by
October 15, 2023. In Process

ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Housing Element Implementation
Housing Programs Progress Report
Describe progress of all programs including local efforts to remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing as identified in the housing element.

Table D
Program Implementation Status pursuant to GC Section 65583 HE 1.1.2
Housing Authority Coordination.

Coordinate with the Riverside County
Housing Authority to pursue grant
funding and other incentives to promote
and assist the nonprofit and/or private
production of housing affordable to
lower income households. Utilize public
financing tools when available,
including revenue bonds, Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG),
HOME, and Low-Income Housing Tax
Credit (LIHTC) program funds.

Continued from 5th Cycle.

Coordinate annually with
the Riverside County
Housing Authority.

Ongoing or Complete
HE 1.1.3
Mobile Homeowner Assistance. As
resources allow, use federal and state
grant funds, when available, to assist
seniors, veterans and other lower
income households purchase and/or
improve mobile homes.

Continued from 5th Cycle
and ongoing for the 2021-
2029 planning period.

Ongoing or Complete
HE 1.1.4
Affordable Housing Incentives. Consider
establishing incentives for developers of
new housing that is affordable to lower
income households and special needs
groups, such as: fast track/priority
application and permit processing,
density bonuses and/or fee waivers,
assist affordable housing developers
with right- of-way acquisition, off-site
infrastructure improvements and other
development costs, and assist in
securing federal or state housing
financing resources. Incentives should
be considered for new housing
developments of 100 or more units in
which at least 10% of total units are sold
or rented at prices affordable to
households with incomes below 80% of
the Riverside County Area Median
Income (AMI).

Implement within 18
months of Housing
Element Adoption.

In Process
HE 1.1.5
Employee Housing Act Ordinance.

Update the Jurupa Valley Municipal
Code to include provisions for work
force housing/ employee housing to
ensure consistency with state law,
including all requirements for the
Employee Housing Act.

Initiate within 6 months of
Housing Element Adoption
and adopt within 18
months of initiation.

Ongoing or Complete
HE 1.1.6
Affordable Housing Development
Review. Develop SB35 expedited review
process guide and qualification
checklist for the development of
affordable housing units in the City for
developers.

Complete within 2022,
monitor annually for
updates.

In Process
HE 1.1.7
Accessory Dwelling Units. Develop ADU
informational materials and 'as built'
sample plans to promote the
development of ADUs in the City;
monitor the production and affordability
of ADU’s annually to ensure meeting the
assumptions outlined in this element;
and revisit the RHNA strategy mid-cycle
if ADU production and affordability falls
short of assumptions.

Complete ADU
informational materials
and ‘as built’ sample plans
within 2022. Annually
monitor ADUs permitted at
the time of the Annual
Progress Reports (APRs).

If needed, revisit and adapt
the RHNA strategy mid-
cycle.

In Process
HE 1.1.8
Density Provisions. Update the Jurupa
Valley Municipal Code and General Plan
density provisions to ensure
consistency with government codes,
including minimum density
requirements and density bonuses, as
required by state law, to encourage
production of smaller, affordable
housing, particularly in Town Centers
and in higher density, mixed-use and
other areas where appropriate and
compatible with adjacent development.

Continued from 5th Cycle.

Complete by October 15,
2023.

Ongoing or Complete
HE 1.1.9
Affordable Housing In-Lieu Fees.

Establish a City affordable housing fund
and affordable housing in-lieu fee
program. Work with private housing
developers to include affordable units
and/or make in-lieu contribution to City’s
affordable housing fund.

Establish affordable
housing fund and in-lieu
fee program within
calendar year 2022. On an
ongoing basis, work with
private developers to
include affordable units
and/or make in-lieu
contributions to the
affordable housing fund.

Ongoing or Complete
HE 1.1.10
City Development Fees. Develop a
sliding scale fee assistance program
where the amount and type of City
development fees may be waived by the
City Council based on the number of
affordable units proposed (i.e., as the
number of affordable units increases,
the amount of fee waiver increases).

Adopt sliding scale fee
assistance program within
Fiscal Year 2022-2023.

In Process
HE 1.1.11
Assistance Programs. Create programs
and grant application program to
provide the CDBG funds obtained by the
City to the community for neighborhood
development.

Ongoing for the 2021- 2029
planning period in
coordination annually with
the City’s CDBG Program
Ongoing or Complete
HE 1.1.12
Site Identification. Work with public,
private and nonprofit housing entities to
identify candidate sites for new
construction of rental housing for
seniors and other special housing
needs, and take all actions necessary to
expedite processing and approval of
qualified projects determined by the
City.

Continued from 5th Cycle
and ongoing for the 2021-
2029 planning period.

Ongoing or Complete
HE 1.1.13
Updated Land Use Inventory and Map.

Establish and maintain a Land Use
Inventory and a map that provide a
mechanism to monitor a) acreage and
location by General Plan designation, b)
vacant and underutilized land, and c)
build-out of approved projects utilizing
the City’s GIS system and supported by
mapping. Maintain the Land Use
Inventory on a regular basis, as
frequently as budget allows.

Continued from 5th Cycle.

Establish Land Use
Inventory and map within
2022-2023. Monitor
annually within the 2021-
2029 planning period.

Future Work Effort
HE 1.1.14
Candidate Sites Mapping. Collaborate
with developers to identify vacant and
underutilized properties as candidate
sites for affordable or mixed market
rate/affordable housing development
and identify them in the Land Use
Inventory.

Complete within 18
months of Housing
Element adoption.

In Process
HE 1.1.15
Homeless Shelter. In cooperation with
nonprofit organizations, adjacent cities,
and with Riverside County, encourage
the development of a homeless shelter
to meet Jurupa Valley’s and adjacent
communities’ homeless shelter needs.

Adopt a plan within 24
months of Housing
Element adoption.

Ongoing or Complete
HE 1.1.16
Homelessness Strategy. Until a
permanent shelter or shelters can be
established within the City, the City shall
work with Riverside County and local
housing agencies to help prepare a
homelessness strategy to address
immediate needs dealing with safety,
health and sanitation, environmental
health, temporary housing, and access
to homeless services. The strategy shall
address all special needs categories
including, but not limited to, persons
with developmental disabilities and
farmworkers.

Adopt a strategy within 18
months of Housing
Element adoption.

In Process
HE 1.1.17
Update the I-P Zone Parking Standards
for Emergency Shelters. Update the I-P
Zone parking requirements of the
Zoning Ordinance for Emergency
Shelters to accommodate all staff
working in emergency shelters, provided
they do not require more parking for
emergency shelters than other
commercial uses within the I-P zone.

Update the parking
standards of the I-P zone
for emergency shelters
within 18 months of
adoption of the Housing
Element.

Complete
HE 1.1.18
Creative Housing Solutions. Provide
incentives to encourage development of
a range of creative and affordable
housing types to accommodate
homeless persons, seniors, disabled
persons, and other low and extremely
low-income populations, such as single
room occupancy dwellings (SROs), pre-
fabricated housing, so-called “tiny
houses,” and other emerging housing
products. Potential incentives include
priority permit processing, fee waivers
or deferrals, flexible development
standards, supporting or assisting with
funding applications, and coordinating
with housing developers. Incentives
shall address all special needs
categories including, but not limited to,
persons with developmental disabilities
and farm workers.

Adopt incentives within 24
months of Housing
Element adoption.

Future Work Effort
HE 1.1.19
Coordination with Non-Profit Housing
Providers. Work with non-profit
organizations in the production of
affordable and self-help housing for all
special needs groups.

Ongoing, 2021-2029 City
will continue to consult
with nonprofit housing
providers at least annually
and on an on-going basis
as part of its annual CDBG
outreach.

Ongoing or Complete
HE 1.1.20
Flexible Standards. Continue to provide
for flexibility in the design of residential
development through the processing of
planned unit developments (PUDs), area
and specific plans, and town center
plans, and through the application of
Zoning Ordinance provisions allowing
flexible lot sizes and development
standards.

Continued from 5th Cycle
and ongoing for the 2021-
2029 planning period.

Ongoing or Complete
HE 1.1.21
Inclusionary housing Ordinance. Study
the feasibility of adopting an
Inclusionary Housing Ordinance.

Initiate study within 6
months of adoption of 6th
cycle housing element and
adopt within 18 months
from initiation
Ongoing or Complete
HE 1.1.22
Mixed Housing Types and Densities.

Continue to work with residential
developers to develop a range of
housing types and densities for all
income levels, including affordable
housing, using creative planning
concepts such as traditional
neighborhood design, small lot
subdivisions, planned unit
developments, area and specific plans,
and mixed-use development.

Continued from 5th Cycle
and ongoing for the 2021-
2029 planning period.

Ongoing or Complete
HE 1.1.23
Lanterman Act Ordinance. Update the
Jurupa Valley Municipal Code disability
accessibility provisions to ensure
consistency with state law, including all
requirements for the Lanterman Act. In
addition to allowing residential care
facilities of six or fewer persons through
a ministerial process, larger group
homes of seven or more persons must
be permitted ministerially, regardless of
license.

Adopt in 18 months of
adoption of 6th cycle
housing element
Ongoing or Complete
HE 1.1.24
Affordable Housing for Disabled
Persons. Apply for grant money and as
budget allows, help support programs
providing increased opportunities for
disabled persons in affordable
residences rehabilitated or constructed
through City or County programs.

Continued from 5th Cycle
and Ongoing for the 2021-
2029 planning period.

Ongoing or Complete
HE 1.1.25
Code and Fee Transparency. Regularly
review and update the City’s website
and other materials to ensure that
planning and development processes,
regulations and fees are readily
accessible and transparent.

Ongoing 2021-2029. Ongoing or Complete
HE 1.1.26
Transitional, Temporary and Permanent
Supportive Housing, and Low Barrier
Navigation Centers. Review and update
the City’s Zoning Code to ensure that
transitional, temporary and permanent
supportive housing and low barrier
navigation centers are allowed by-right
in zones allowing similar types of
residential development as required by
state law.

Initiate within 12 months
of adoption of the 6th
Cycle Housing Element.

In Process
HE 1.1.27
Development within Density Range.

Encourage development at the upper
limits of the allowable General Plan
density range to increase housing
choice in the City. Requests for
densities below the allowable density
range should generally be discouraged
except where environmental constraints
or other factors limit the development
potential of a site.

Ongoing 2021-2029. Ongoing or Complete
HE 2.1.1
Adaptive Housing Strategies. Develop
program to assist in creative strategies
for the rehabilitation and adaptive reuse
of residential, commercial, and industrial
structures for housing, if appropriate
Continued from 5th Cycle.

Work with HOME/CDBG
Programs and develop
adaptive housing
strategies program by
2024.

Future Work Effort
HE 2.1.2
Code Enforcement. Ensure that housing
is maintained through code enforcement
activities. Continue to administer the
Code Enforcement Program to eliminate
unsafe, illegal, and substandard
conditions in residential neighborhoods
and residential properties.

Ongoing 2021-2029. Ongoing or Complete
HE 2.1.3
Affordable Mobile Homes Conservation.

Conserve affordable mobile home
housing stock and help bring such
housing up to code through mobile
home loan and improvement grants
funded by CDBG and other funds, as
available.

Work with FHCRC to
develop a program for
annual outreach to mobile
home owners, non-profits
and other agencies and
fund three mobile home
improvements per year
beginning in FY 23/24 with
CDBG funds.

Ongoing or Complete
HE 2.1.4
Affordable Homes Conservation.

Conserve affordable housing stock and
help bring such housing up to code
through and improvement grants funded
by CDBG and other funds, as available.

In addition, where affordable homes are
in need of replacement, help with
replacement through CDBG and other
funds.

Develop a program for
affordable home repair and
replacement within 36
months of Housing
Element adoption.

Ongoing or Complete
HE 2.1.5
Bilingual Outreach. As resources allow,
provide bilingual outreach materials and
activities to educate and inform the
community about available housing
rehabilitation programs and resources.

Continued from 5th Cycle
and Ongoing for the 2021-
2029 planning period.

Ongoing or Complete
HE 2.1.6
Monitor Assisted Units. Help ensure that
affordable housing assisted with public
funds remains affordable for the
required time through maintenance of
an inventory of assisted units which is
monitored for expiration of assisted
housing.

Continued from 5th Cycle.

Create inventory within
Fiscal Year 2022-2023,
monitor regularly for the
2021-2029 planning period.

Ongoing or Complete
HE 2.1.7
Preserve At-Risk Housing Units.

Preserve grant- assisted, bond-financed,
density bonus or other types of
affordable units at risk of conversion to
market rate during the planning period
by working with the Riverside County
Housing Authority or other nonprofit
housing entities to 1) purchase the units
using state, federal or local financing
and/or subsidies, 2) assist with low or
no interest loans for rehabilitation, as
budget allows, 3) support bond
refinancing, and 4) refer the project
sponsor to other federal or local sources
of below-market financing. City shall
also ensure compliance with state
noticing and tenant education
requirements.

Continued from 5th Cycle.

Create inventory within
Fiscal Year 2022-2023,
monitor regularly for the
2021-2029 planning period.

Ongoing or Complete
HE 2.1.8
Affordability Covenants. As a condition
of project approval, require new
affordable housing projects to remain
affordable for a specific time, consistent
with and as required by the funding
program(s) in which they participate,
through covenants with the project
proponent, Housing Authority or other
housing agency.

Continued from 5th Cycle
and ongoing for the 2021-
2029 planning period.

In Process
HE 2.1.9
Remove Government Constraints.

Evaluate the zoning ordinance,
subdivision requirements, and other City
regulations to remove governmental
constraints to the maintenance,
improvement, and development of
housing, where appropriate and legally
possible. Evaluate and revise as
appropriate the City’s density
requirements for the Highest Density
Residential land use designation (HHDR)
to address constraints for housing
development including impacts on
feasibility of proposals.

Ongoing action for 2021-
2029 planning period and
annually assessed.

Ongoing or Complete
HE 3.1.1
Fair Housing Council. Utilize the
services of the Fair Housing Council of
Riverside County to implement a
number of programs, including: 1)
audits of lending institutions and rental
establishments, 2) education and
training of City staff, and 3) fair housing
outreach and education regarding fair
housing laws and resources.

Continued from 5th Cycle
and ongoing for the 2021-
2029 planning period.

Ongoing or Complete
HE 3.1.2
Education and Outreach. Continue to
use the services of the Fair Housing
Council to provide education and
outreach services to the public in both
Spanish and English (also see HE 3.1.1
above).

Continued from 5th Cycle
and ongoing for the 2021-
2029 planning period.

Ongoing or Complete
HE 3.1.3
Public Housing and Rental Assistance.

Develop program to assist in creative
strategies for the rehabilitation and
adaptive reuse of residential,
commercial, and industrial structures for
housing, if appropriate.

Continued from 5th Cycle.

Develop program within
Fiscal Year 2022-2023 and
ongoing for the 2021- 2029
planning period.

Future Work Effort
HE 3.1.4
First-Time Homebuyers Assistance.

Explore the feasibility of developing a
new First Time Home Buyer Down
Payment Assistance Program, utilizing
tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds to
finance mortgages and down payment
assistance for single-family homes for
very low and low income first-time
homebuyers.

Continued from 5th Cycle.

Explore within Fiscal Year
2022-2023 and ongoing for
the 2021-2029 planning
period.

Future Work Effort
HE 3.1.5
Multi-Family Dwellings Standards.

Establish standards for multiple-family
dwellings that will achieve comparable
recreation and open space
opportunities, protection from sources
of noise and degraded air quality,
adequate access to public services and
facilities and parking,
Continued from 5th Cycle.

Adopt within Fiscal Year
2021-2021.

Ongoing or Complete
HE 3.1.6
Fair Housing Council. Collaborate with
the Fair Housing Council of Riverside
County to continue to provide services
to the community and accept requests,
complaints and assistance for fair
housing needs.

Continued from 5th Cycle
and ongoing for the 2021-
2029 planning period.

Ongoing or Complete
HE 3.1.7
Reasonable Accommodations. Establish
a written procedure for providing
reasonable accommodations in zoning
code and land use.

Initiate and complete in 18
months of Housing
Element certification with
HCD
Ongoing or Complete
HE 4.1.1
Neighborhood Participation. Implement
varied strategies to ensure residents are
aware of and able to participate in
planning decisions affecting their
neighborhoods early in the planning
process, such as neighborhood
meetings, City Council member visits,
and town hall meetings.

Continued from 5th Cycle
and ongoing for the 2021-
2029 planning period.

Ongoing or Complete
HE 4.1.2
Neighborhood Needs. Identify specific
neighborhood needs, problems, trends,
and opportunities for improvements.

Work directly with neighborhood groups
and individuals to address concerns.

Continued from 5th Cycle
and ongoing for the 2021-
2029 planning period.

Ongoing or Complete
HE 4.1.3
Neighborhood Improvements. As budget
allows, help fund neighborhood
improvements, such as street paving or
repairs, sidewalks, pedestrian and
equestrian trails, crosswalks, parkways,
street trees and other public facilities to
improve aesthetics, safety, and
accessibility.

Continued from 5th Cycle
and ongoing for the 2021-
2029 planning period.

Ongoing or Complete
HE 4.1.4
Neighborhood Pride. Working with
Riverside County, CSDs and nonprofit
housing entities, develop and promote a
Neighborhood Pride Program including
cooperative projects with Code
Enforcement staff, and Public Works
projects in target areas, as funding
allows.

Develop within 18 months
of Housing Element
adoption and ongoing for
the 2021-2029 planning
period.

Future Work Effort
HE 5.1.1
Incentives. Consider establishing
incentives for energy conservation
above and beyond the requirements of
Title 24, such as priority permit
processing or reduced permit fees on a
sliding scale Fee Assistance Program,
as budget allows.

Continued from 5th Cycle
and ongoing for the 2021-
2029 planning period.

Future Work Effort
HE 5.1.2
Energy Programs for Lower Income
Households. Encourage and participate
in Riverside County’s and utility
providers’ programs to reduce
maintenance and energy costs for
households with low incomes and
increase efforts to inform the public
about available cost-saving, energy
conservation programs.

Continued from 5th Cycle
and ongoing for the 2021-
2029 planning period.

Ongoing or Complete
HE 5.1.3
Energy Conservation Grants. Pursue
grant funds for energy rehab costs and
consumer education.

Continued from 5th Cycle
and ongoing for the 2021-
2029 planning period.

Ongoing or Complete
HE 5.1.4
City Requests for Proposals. City RFPs,
contracts, and bidding procedures for
capital projects and programs shall
incorporate energy conservation and
sustainability measures.

Continued from 5th Cycle
and ongoing for the 2021-
2029 planning period.

Ongoing or Complete
HE 5.1.5
Sustainable Design. Adopt sustainable
design policies, standards and codes
that result in attractive, energy-efficient,
neighborhoods.

Adopt within 18 months of
Housing Element adoption Future Work Effort
HE 6.1.1
AFFH Actions. Implement measures to
affirmatively further fair housing.

On-going for the 2021-2029
planning period
[See Attachment C]

General Comments
Jurisdiction Jurupa Valley ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Reporting Period 2023 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Planning Period 6th Cycle 10/15/2021 - 10/15/2029
Description of Commercial
Development Bonus
Commercial Development Bonus
Date Approved
3 4
APN Street Address Project Name+ Local Jurisdiction
Tracking ID+
Very Low
Income
Low
Income
Moderate
Income
Above Moderate
Income
Description of Commercial
Development Bonus
Commercial Development Bonus
Date Approved
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below
Units Constructed as Part of Agreement
Commercial Development Bonus Approved pursuant to GC Section 65915.7 Table E
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
Project Identifier
1 2
Cells in grey contain auto-calculation
formulas
(CCR Title 25 §6202)
Annual Progress Report January 2020
Jurisdiction Jurupa Valley ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Note: "+" indicates an optional field Reporting Period 2023 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas Planning Period 6th Cycle 10/15/2021 - 10/15/2029
The description should adequately document how each
unit complies with subsection (c) of Government Code
Section 65583.1+.

For detailed reporting requirements, see the chcklist
here:

Extremely Low-
Income+ Very Low-Income+ Low-Income+ TOTAL UNITS+
Extremely Low-
Income+
Very Low-
Income+ Low-Income+ TOTAL UNITS+
https://www.hcd.ca.gov/community-
development/docs/adequate-sites-checklist.pdf
Rehabilitation Activity
Preservation of Units At-Risk
Acquisition of Units
Mobilehome Park Preservation
Total Units by Income
Table F
Please note this table is optional: The jurisdiction can use this table to report units that have been substantially rehabilitated, converted from non-affordable to affordable by acquisition, and preserved, including mobilehome park preservation, consistent with the standards set forth in Government Code section 65583.1, subdivision (c). Please note, motel, hotel, hostel rooms or other structures that are converted from non-residential to residential units pursuant to Government Code section 65583.1(c)(1)(D) are considered net-new housing units and must be reported in Table A2 and not reported in Table F.

Activity Type
Units that Do Not Count Towards RHNA+
Listed for Informational Purposes Only
Units that Count Towards RHNA +
Note - Because the statutory requirements severely limit what can be counted, please contact HCD at [email protected] and we will unlock the form which enable you to populate these fields.

Units Rehabilitated, Preserved and Acquired for Alternative Adequate Sites pursuant to Government Code section 65583.1(c) Annual Progress Report January 2020
Jurisdiction Jurupa Valley ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Note: "+" indicates
an optional field
Reporting Period 2023 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas Planning Period 6th Cycle 10/15/2021 - 10/15/2029
Notes
2 3 6
Prior APN+ Current APN Street Address Project Name+
Local
Jurisdiction
Tracking ID
Unit
Category
(2 to 4,5+)
Tenure
R=Renter
Very Low-
Income Deed
Restricted
Very Low-
Income
Non Deed
Restricted
Low- Income
Deed Restricted
Low- Income
Non Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income Non
Deed Restricted
Above
Moderate-
Income
Total Moderate Income
Units Converted from Above
Moderate
Date Converted Notes
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Table F2
Above Moderate Income Units Converted to Moderate Income Pursuant to Government Code section 65400.2 For up to 25 percent of a jurisdiction’s moderate-income regional housing need allocation, the planning agency may include the number of units in an existing multifamily building that were converted to deed-restricted rental housing for moderate-income households by the imposition of affordability covenants and restrictions for the unit. Before adding information to this table, please ensure housing developments meet the requirements described in Government Code 65400.2(b). 5 Project Identifier Unit Types
1 4
Affordability by Household Incomes After Conversion Units credited toward Moderate Income RHNA
Jurisdiction Jurupa Valley
Reporting Period 2023 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
Planning Period 6th Cycle 10/15/2021 - 10/15/2029 ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Housing Element Implementation
2 3 4
APN Street Address Project Name+
Local
Jurisdiction
Tracking ID+
Realistic
Capacity
Identified in the
Housing Element
Entity to whom the site
transferred Intended Use for Site
1 Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
Cells in grey contain auto-calculation
formulas
Table G
Locally Owned Lands Included in the Housing Element Sites Inventory that have been sold, leased, or otherwise disposed of Project Identifier
NOTE: This table must only be filled out if the housing element sites inventory contains a site which is or was owned by the reporting jurisdiction, and has been sold, leased, or otherwise disposed of during the reporting year.

Jurisdiction Jurupa Valley Note: "+" indicates an optional field Reporting Period 2023
(Jan. 1 - Dec.
31)
Cells in grey contain auto-calculation
formulas
Designation Size Notes
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
APN Street Address/Intersection Existing Use Number of
Units
Surplus
Designation
Parcel Size (in
acres) Notes
NOTE: This table must contain an invenory of ALL
surplus/excess lands the reporting jurisdiction owns
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below
Parcel Identifier

ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Housing Element Implementation
Table H
Locally Owned Surplus Sites
For Riverside County jurisdictions, please format the APN's as follows:999-999-999

Jurisdiction Jurupa Valley ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Reporting Period 2023 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Planning Period 6th Cycle 10/15/2021 - 10/15/2029
Project Type Date
2 3
APN Street Address Project Name+ Local Jurisdiction
Tracking ID+
Unit Category
(SH - Student Housing) Date Very Low- Income
Deed Restricted
Very Low- Income
Non Deed
Restricted
Low- Income Deed
Restricted
Low- Income
Non Deed
Restricted
Moderate- Income
Deed Restricted
Moderate- Income
Non Deed
Restricted
Above
Moderate-
Income
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below
Note
Cells in g
Table J
Student housing development for lower income students for which was granted a density bonus pursuant to subparagraph (F) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 65915 Project Identifier Units (Beds/Student Capacity) Approved 1 4
NOTE: STUDENT HOUSING WITH DENSITY BONUS ONLY. This
table only needs to be completed if there were student housing projects WITH a density bonus approved pursuant to
Government Code65915(b)(1)(F)
Annual Progress Report January 2020
Jurisdiction Jurupa Valley ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Reporting Period 2023 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
Planning Period 6th Cycle 10/15/2021 - 10/15/2029
No
Table K
Tenent Preference Policy
Local governments are required to inform HCD about any local tenant preference ordinance the local government maintains when the jurisdiction submits their annual progress report on housing approvals and production, per Government Code 7061 (SB 649, 2022, Cortese). Effective January 1, 2023, local governments adopting a tenant preference are required to create a webpage on their internet website containing authorizing local ordinance and supporting materials, no more than 90 days after the ordinance becomes operational.

Does the Jurisdiction have a local tenant preference policy? If the jurisdiction has a local tenant preference policy, provide a link to the jurisdiction's webpage on their internet website containing authorizing local ordinance and supporting materials.

Notes
Jurisdiction Jurupa Valley
Reporting Year 2023 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
Total Award Amount Total award amount is auto-populated based on amounts entered in rows 15-26.

Task $ Amount Awarded $ Cumulative Reimbursement
Requested
Other
Funding Notes
General Plan Consistency $160,000.00 $69,701.25
ADU Ord Update and Prep of Plans $155,000.00 $140,539.00 80 percent completed as of Feb. 22, 2024 2021-2029 Housing Element $185,000.00 $199,052.50
Summary of entitlements, building permits, and certificates of occupancy (auto-populated from Table A2) Current Year
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 11
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 17
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 17
3 48
Current Year
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 16
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 25
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 25
62 128
Current Year
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 10
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 15
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 15
120
160

ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Local Early Action Planning (LEAP) Reporting
(CCR Title 25 §6202)
Completed
Please update the status of the proposed uses listed in the entity’s application for funding and the corresponding impact on housing within the region or jurisdiction, as applicable, categorized based on the eligible uses specified in Section 50515.02 or 50515.03, as applicable.
500,000.00$
Task Status
Completed
In Progress
Total Units
Certificate of Occupancy Issued by Affordability Summary Income Level
Very Low
Low
Moderate
Above Moderate
Moderate
Above Moderate
Total Units
Completed Entitlement Issued by Affordability Summary
Income Level
Very Low
Low
Moderate
Above Moderate
Total Units
Building Permits Issued by Affordability Summary
Income Level
Very Low
Low
Page | 1
120

STAFF REPORT
DATE: MARCH 21, 2024
TO
: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
F
ROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: ABDON PADILLA, FINANCE MANAGER

JUNE OVERHOLT, INTERIM FINANCE DIRECTOR
S
UBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 13.J
Q

UARTERLY INVESTMENT REPORT FOR THE QUARTERS ENDING
SEPTEMBER 30, 2023 AND DECEMBER 31, 2023 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
RE

COMMENDATION
R
eceive and file the quarterly investment reports for Fiscal Year 2023-24 quarters ending September 30 and December 31, 2023.

BACKGROUND
P
ursuant to state law, a quarterly investment report shall be received and filed with the City Council to provide a status of the current investments. City funds continue to be invested in the Local Agency Investment Fund, (LAIF) as well as in US Treasuries through Wulff, Hansen and Company. These reports present the City’s investment portfolio for quarters ending September 30, 2023 and quarter ending December 31, 2023.

AN
ALYSIS
T
o provide an overview of quarterly investment report for investments held in LAIF and with the California State Treasurer, and investments in US Treasuries for the quarters ending September 30 and December 31, 2023.

S
taff will continue to provide City Council with quarterly investment reports.

INANCIAL IMPACT
Th
ere is no financial impact. This item is for informational purposes only.

RETURN TO AGENDA

Page | 1
120

STAFF REPORT
D
ATE: MARCH 21, 2024
TO
: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
F
ROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: JOE PEREZ, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
S
UBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.A
P

UBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND
CHAPTER 9.112 OF THE JURUPA VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE TO

CORRECT THE ALLOWED LAND USES FOR THE BUSINESS PARK
(B-P) ZONE AND MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER CEQA

RECOMMENDATION

1. That the City Council conduct a public hearing, receive testimony, and conduct a first reading and introduce Ordinance No. 2024-07, entitled:

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING CHAPTER 9.112 OF THE JURUPA VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE

AMENDING THE USES ALLOWED IN THE BUSINESS PARK ZONE AND

FINDING THE ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT FROM FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PURSUANT TO SECTION 15061(B)(3) OF THE CEQA GUIDELINES

BACKGROUND
On December 2, 2021, the City Council adopted a Truck Intensive Use Urgency Ordinance to reduce truck impacts on the City and initiated a Zoning Code Amendment to the Business Park (B -P) Zone to make it more consistent with the General Plan and the goals of the Truck Intensive Use Ordinance.

At the May 25, 2022 Planning Commission hearing, the Planning Commission reviewed the recommended B -P zone code amendment to update the allowed land uses and development standards. Afterwards, the Planning Commission made a recommendation to approve the code amendment to the City Council.

On June 16, 2022, the City Council considered and approved the amendment to the B-P zone and introduced Ordinance 2022- 10. Then, on July 7, 2022, the City Council conducted the second reading of Ordinance No. 2022-10, and it took effect on August 7, 2022.

RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2

On December 15, 2022, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 2022-24, amending the municipal code regarding automobile fueling station uses. This “ Automobile Fueling Station” Ordinance addressed various issues with gas stations in the C ity, such as their proliferation, impact on sensitive areas, and lack of regulatory standards. The Automobile Fueling Station Ordinance added a new requirement for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for automobile fueling stations (instead of a Site Development Permit) and new terms and development standards. However, due to an oversight, the Automobile Fueling Station Ordinance did not include Ordinance No. 2022- 10 amendments to the B -P zone. Thus, by the adoption of the Automobile Fueling Station Ordinance, the list of permitted uses in the B-P zone reverted back to their previous state.

ANALYSIS
To rectify the unintended changes, the purpose of this amendment is to readopt the list of permitted uses in the Business Park Zone and reflect amendments to the B -P zone from the Automobile Fueling Station Ordinance (requirement of a CUP and changing the term). Attachment 2 provides redline changes to the Business Park Zone that revert the permitted uses back to their original state and includes the requirement for a Conditional Use Permit for automobile fueling stations. The list of permitted uses for the B-P zone are shown below:

Permitted uses with approval of a Site Development Permit

1. Ambulance, taxi, and/or limousine dispatch facility.

2. Antennas and telecommunications facilities.

3. Automobile services-repair and maintenance

4. Bakery - Wholesale

5. Banks, Financial Institutions and ATMs.

6. Childcare Services.

7. Civic Uses – government, public safety, community center, cultural center and similar.

8. Commercial food kitchens, ghost kitchens, catering services, or commissary (without outdoor storage of commercial vehicles including food trucks).

9. Commercial amusement and recreational facilities.

10. Conference, convention, or banquet facilities.

11. Contractor business completely within a building without outdoor storage of equipment or fleet of vehicles.

12. Copying, printing, and publishing services.

13. Equipment sales and rental – excluding heavy vehicles and equipment, including cranes, boom lifts, earthmovers, dozers, loaders, excavators, and similar vehicles and equipment.

14. Health and fitness facilities.

15. Laboratory – medical, analytical, research, testing.

Page | 3

16. Maintenance services for infrastructure improvements including road, sewer, water and similar.

17. Manufacturing light – manufacturing operations with associated activities that take place within a wholly enclosed building. Examples of manufacturing light include home accessories, furniture, cabinetry, sporting equipment, toys, food, clothing and accessories, footwear, handmade Artisan craft, instruments, computers, electronic devices and similar.

18. Media producing – broadcast studios.

19. Medical services clinic, office, outpatient services, and urgent care.

20. Office - administrative, corporate, and professional.

21. Personal care services — nails, skin, hair care services, hair removal services, make-up salons, and similar uses.

22. Repair services—Electronic equipment, large appliances, etc.

23. Research and development, technology center.

24. Restaurants or food establishments excluding drive-thru, alcohol beverage sales, and live entertainment (examples: full -service restaurants, cafeterias, buffets, sandwich, coffee, ice cream and similar establishments).

25. Retail or warehouse stores 45,000 square feet or less gross floor area.

26. Schools- college, universities, vocational, specialized training, instruction, sports and recreation instruction, education support services (tutorial services).

27. Social service organizations.

28. Studio—Art, dance, martial arts, music, photography and similar.

29. Transit stops, stations, terminals.

30. Utilities - gas, electric, sewer and similar.

31. Veterinary clinics, animal hospitals, which may include ancillary indoor boarding.

Permitted Uses with approval of a Conditional Use Permit

1. Alcoholic beverage sales for on- premises consumption with restaurants/food establishments, microbreweries, brew pubs, craft breweries hotels, and conference, convention, and banquet facilities and off -premise sales for microbreweries and general retail uses pursuant to Section 9.240.490.

2. Auto, pickup truck, motorcycle, boat and RV sales, rental and repair. Any repairs and associated activities shall be within a wholly enclosed building.

3. Automobile fueling stations not including the concurrent sale of beer and wine for off-premises consumption, and excluding truck stops/travel centers.

4. Commercial food kitchens, ghost kitchens, catering services, or commissary (with commercial vehicles or food trucks pursuant to Section 6.20.120.

5. Hotel, motel, extended stay hotel.

ATTACHMENT 1
Ordinance, Amending the Business Park Land Use

-1-
12774-0007\2922296v1.doc

ORDINANCE NO. 2024-07

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF JURUPA VALLEY , CALIFORNIA, AMENDING
SECTION 9.112.020 OF THE JURUPA VALLEY

MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO PERMITTED USES

IN THE BUSINESS PARK ZONE , AND MAKING A

FINDING THE ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT FROM CEQA

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley does hereby find, determine and declare that:
(a) At the December 21, 2021 regular City Council meeting, the City Council adopted a Truck Intensive Use Urgency Ordinance to reduce truck impacts on the City. In addition, the City Council initiated a Zoning Code Amendment to the Business Park (B-P) Zone to make it more consistent with the General Plan and the goals of the Truck Intensive Use Ordinance. (b) At the May 25, 2022 Planning Commission hearing, the Planning Commission reviewed the proposed Business Park zone amendment to update the allo wed land uses and development standards and recommended approval to the City Council (“Code Amendments”). On July 7, 2022-10, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 2022-10, and it took effect on August 7, 2022.
(c) On December 1, 2022, the City Council approved a Gas Station Ordinance, which modified review requirements for gas stations to require a conditional use permit instead of a site development permit. The Business Park Zone, which originally permitted gas stations with a site development permit, was subject to the amendments outlined in the Gas Station Ordinance.

However, due to an oversight, the Gas Station Ordinance inadvertently altered the land use regulations of the pre-existing Business Park zoning, effectively undoing the changes implemented by Ordinance 2022-10. This unintentionally resulted in reverting the Business Park Land Uses back to their previous state, nullifying the amendments made by Ordinance No. 2022-10. (d) On March 8, 2024, the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed Code Amendment, at which time all persons interested in the Code Amendment had the opportunity and did address the City Council on these matters.

Following the receipt of public testimony the City Council closed the p ublic hearing and duly considered the written and oral testimony received.
(e) All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.

Section 2. California Environmental Quality Act Findings . The proposed Code Amendment is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) and the City ’s CEQA Guidelines pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed Code

-2-
12774-0007\2922296v1.doc

Amendment, amending the definition of educational facilities, will have a significant effect on the environment. The proposed Code Amendment amends the Business Park zone to make revisions that were previously made by Ordinance No. 2022 -10 and the environmental impacts were analyzed by Or dinance No. 2022 -10. The City Council has reviewed the administrative record concerning the proposed Code Amendment and the proposed CEQA exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, finds that the Code Amendment set forth in this Ordinance is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) and the City ’s CEQA Guidelines pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3).

Section 3. General Plan Consistency Finding . The City Council hereby finds, as required by the Jurupa Valle y Ordinances and applicable state law, that the proposed Code Amendment should be adopted because the proposed Code Amendment is consistent with the City of Jurupa Valley General Plan. The General Plan Goal for the Business Park (BP) land use designation states that: “The Business Park land use designation allows for employee intensive uses, including research and development, technology centers, corporate and support office uses, “clean” industry, and supporting retail uses. Floor area ratios range from 0. 25 to 0.6. The Code Amendment includes land uses that are employment generators such as research and development, technology centers, corporate offices and “clean” industry.

Section 4. Section 9.112.020 (Permitted Uses) of Chapter 9.112 (B-P Zone (Business Park) of Title 9 (Planning and Zoning) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
“Sec. 9.112.020. Uses permitted.

A. The following uses are permitted provided approval of a site development permit shall first have been obtained pursuant to the provisions of Section 9.240.330:
(1) Ambulance, taxi, and/or limousine dispatch facility. (2) Antennas and telecommunications facilities.
(3) Automobile services-repair and maintenance
(4) Bakery - Wholesale
(5) Banks, Financial Institutions and ATMs.
(6) Childcare Services.
(7) Civic Uses – government, public safety, community center, cultural center and similar. (8) Commercial food kitchens, ghost kitchens, catering services, or commissary (without outdoor storage of commercial vehicles including food trucks). (9) Commercial amusement and recreational facilities.
(10) Conference, convention, or banquet facilities.
(11) Contractor business completely within a building without outdoor storage of equipment or fleet of vehicles.
(12) Copying, printing, and publishing services.
(13) Equipment sales and rental – excluding heavy vehicles and equipment, including cranes, boom lifts, earthmovers, dozers, loaders, excavators, and similar vehicles and equipment. (14) Health, and fitness facilities.
(15) Laboratory – medical, analytical, research, testing. (16) Maintenance services for infrastructure improvements including road, sewer, water and similar.

-3-
12774-0007\2922296v1.doc

(17) Manufacturing light – manufacturing operations with associated activities that take place within a wholly enclosed building. Examples of manufacturing light include home accessories, furniture, cabinetry, sporting equipment, toys, food, clothing and accessories, footwear, handmade Artisan craft, instruments, computers, electronic devices and similar. (18) Media producing – broadcast studios.
(19) Medical services clinic, office, outpatient services, and urgent care. (20) Office - administrative, corporate, and professional. (21) Personal care services— nails, skin, hair care services, hair removal services, make-up salons, and similar uses.
(22) Repair services—Electronic equipment, large appliances, etc. (23) Research and development, technology center.
(24) Restaurants or food establishments excluding drive-thru, alcohol beverage sales, and live entertainment (examples: full-service restaurants, cafeterias, buffets, sandwich, coffee, ice cream and similar establishments).
(25) Retail or warehouse stores 45,000 square feet or less gross floor area. (26) Schools- college, universities, vocational, specialized training, instruction, sports and recreation instruction, education support services (tutorial services). (27) Social service organizations.
28) Studio—Art, dance, martial arts, music, photography and similar. etc. (29) Transit stops, stations, terminals.
(30) Utilities - gas, electric, sewer and similar.
(31) Veterinary clinics, animal hospitals, which may include ancillary indoor boarding.

B. The following uses are permitted provided a conditional use permit has been granted pursuant to Section 9.240.280:
(1) Alcoholic beverage sales for on-premises consumption with restaurants/food establishments, microbreweries, brew pubs, craft breweries hotels, and conference, convention, and banquet facilities and off-premise sales for microbreweries and general retail uses pursuant to Section 9.240.490.
(2) Auto, pickup truck, motorcycle, boat and RV sales, rental and repair. Any repairs and associated activities shall be within a wholly enclosed building. (3) Automobile fueling stations not including the concurrent sale of beer and wine for off- premises consumption, and excluding truck stops/travel centers. (4) Commercial food kitchens, ghost kitchens, catering services, or commissary (with commercial vehicles or food trucks pursuant to Section 6.20.120. (5) Hotel, motel, extended stay hotel.
(6) Heliports.
(7) Hospital.
(8) Microbrewery, brew pub, craft brewery, distilleries, or wineries pursuant to Section

9.240.490.
(9) Retail or Warehouse stores—Greater than forty-five thousand (45,000) square feet gross floor area.
(10) Truck service and repair within a wholly enclosed building (utility, small commercial trucks or tractor trailer)

-4-
12774-0007\2922296v1.doc

C. Uses not listed. Any use that is not specifically listed in subsections A. and B. may be considered a permitted or conditionally permitted use provided that the Community Development Director finds that the proposed use is substantially the same in character and intensity as those listed in the designated subsections. Such a use is subject to the permit process which governs the category in which it falls.

D. Legally established uses. It is the intent of the City Council that a legally established pre- existing land use of an occupied property shall not assume a nonconforming status as a result of the adoption of the 2017 General Plan and the concurrent or subsequent adoption of a change of zone for consistency with the 2017 General Plan. Any pre-existing use certified pursuant to Section 9.240.080 that is not specifically listed in subsections A. and B. shall be considered a permitted or conditionally permitted use the same as provided for such use under the zoning classification of the subject property prior to the adoption of the new zoning classification concurrent with, or subsequent to, the effective date of City Council Resolution No. 2017-14 adopting the 2017 General Plan. The expansion of significant modification of such a pre-existing use shall be subject to the approval process and zoning requirements that had governed the category of use in which it fell under the prior zoning classification. However, nothing in this subsection shall be construed to mean that a site development permit or conditional use permit is required to continue such pre-existing use.” Section 5. If any section or provisio n of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, or contravened by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining sections and/or provisions of this Ordinance shall remain valid. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each section or provision thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more section(s) or provision(s) may be declared invalid or unconstitutional or contravened via legislation.

Section 6. The Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same or a summary thereof t o be published and posted in the manner required by law
Section 7. This Ordinance shall take effect on the date provided in Government Code Section 36937.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 4th day of April, 2024.

_____________________________
Guillermo Silva
Mayor

-5-
12774-0007\2922296v1.doc

ATTEST:

______________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )

I, Victoria Wasko, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 2024 -07 was regularly introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 21st day of March, 2024 and thereafter at a regular meeting held on the 4th day of April, 2024, it was duly passed and adopted by the following vote of the City Council:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 4th day of April, 2024

________________________________
Victoria Wasko, City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley

ATTACHMENT 2
Redline changes to the Business Park zone

Title 9 - PLANNING AND ZONING
CHAPTER 9.112. B-P ZONE (BUSINESS PARK)

Jurupa Valley, California, Municipal Code Created: 2023-12-12 09:28:13 [EST] ( Supp. No. 18)

Page 1 of 5 ends

CHAPTER 9.112. B-P ZONE (BUSINESS PARK)
Sec. 9.112.010. Purpose and application.

The B-P Zone is intended to provide for research and development, light manufacturing, business sales and services and other business-supporting commercial uses. It is not intended to include general warehousing, distribution, shipping, or logistics. The B-P Zone implements and is consistent with the business park land use category of the General Plan.
( Ord. No. 2017-09 , § 5, 9-21-2017; Ord. No. 2022-10 , § 4, 7-7-2022) Sec. 9.112.020. Uses permitted.

A. The following uses are permitted provided approval of a site development permit shall first have been obtained pursuant to the provisions of Section 9.240.330:
(1) Ambulance, taxi, and/or limousine dispatch facility. (2) Antennas and telecommunications facilities.
(3) Commercial recreation facility—Indoor.
(4) Conference facilities.
(5) Convenience market.
(3) Automobile services-repair and maintenance
(4) Bakery - Wholesale
(5) Banks, Financial Institutions and ATMs.
(6) Childcare Services.
(7) Civic Uses – government, public safety, community center, cultural center and similar. (8) Commercial food kitchens, ghost kitchens, catering services, or commissary (without outdoor storage of commercial vehicles including food trucks).
(9) Commercial amusement and recreational facilities. (10) Conference, convention, or banquet facilities.
(11) Contractor business completely within a building without outdoor storage of equipment or fleet of vehicles.
(12) Copying, printing, and publishing services.
(613) Equipment sales and rental – excluding heavy vehicles and equipment, including cranes, boom lifts, earthmovers, dozers, loaders, excavators, and similar vehicles and equipment. (7) Fitness/health facility.
(14) Health, and fitness facilities.
(15) Laboratory – medical, analytical, research, testing.

Created: 2023-12-12 09:28:13 [EST]
( Supp. No. 18)

Page 2 of 5 ends

(8)(16) Maintenance services for infrastructure improvements including road, sewer, water and similar. (17) Manufacturing light – manufacturing operations with associated activities that take place within a wholly enclosed building. Examples of manufacturing light include home accessories, furniture, cabinetry, sporting equipment, toys, food, clothing and accessories, footwear, handmade Artisan craft, instruments, computers, electronic devices and similar. (18) Media producing – broadcast studios.
(9)(19) Medical services Cclinic, office, outpatient services, and urgent care. (10)(20) Office-supporting retail- administrative, corporate, and professional. (11) Parking lots and structures.
(12)(21) Personal care services—N nails, beauty salon, barber skin, hair care services, hair removal services, make-up salons, and similar uses.
(13)(22) Repair services—Electronic equipment, large appliances, etc. (23) Research and development, technology center.
(24) Restaurants or food establishments excluding drive-thru, alcohol beverage sales, and live entertainment (examples: full-service restaurants, cafeterias, buffets, sandwich, coffee, ice cream and similar establishments).
(25) Retail or warehouse stores 45,000 square feet or less gross floor area. (26) Schools- college, universities, vocational, specialized training, instruction, sports and recreation instruction, education support services (tutorial services). (27) Social service organizations.
(14) Warehouse stores—Forty-five thousand (45,000) square feet or less gross floor area. (15) Work/live units.
(16) Vehicle services—Repair and maintenance.
(17)(28) Studio—Art, dance, martial arts, music, photography and similar. etc. (29) Transit stops, stations, terminals.
(30) Utilities - gas, electric, sewer and similar.
(31) Veterinary clinics, animal hospitals, which may include ancillary indoor boarding.

B. The following uses are permitted provided a conditional use permit has been granted pursuant to Section

9.240.280:
. The following uses are permitted provided a conditional use permit has been granted pursuant to Section [9.240.280]:
(1) Alcoholic beverage sales for on-premise consumption with restaurants/food establishments, microbreweries, brew pubs, craft breweries hotels, and conference, convention, and banquet facilities and off-premise sales for microbreweries and general retail uses pursuant to Section [9.240.490].

Created: 2023-12-12 09:28:13 [EST]
( Supp. No. 18)

Page 3 of 5 ends

(1)(2) Auto, pickup truck, motorcycle, boat and RV sales, rental and repair. Repairs and associated activities within a wholly enclosed building.
(2)(3) Automobile fueling stations not including the concurrent sale of beer and wine for off -premises consumption, and excluding truck stops/travel centers.
(3) Bar/tavern pursuant to Section 9.240.490.
(4) Furniture and fixtures manufacturing, cabinet shop. (3) Commercial food kitchens, ghost kitchens, catering services, or commissary (with commercial vehicles or food trucks pursuant to Section [6.20.120].
(5) Hotel, motel, extended stay hotel.
(6) Heliports.
(7) Hospital.
(8) Mortuary, funeral home.
(9) Public safety facilities (police, fire, EMT, etc.)
(12)(8) Microbrewery, brew pub, craft brewery, distilleries, wineries pursuant to Section [9.240.490]. (9) Retail or Warehouse stores—Greater than forty-five thousand (45,000) square feet gross floor area. (10) Truck service and repair within a wholly enclosed building (utility, small commercial trucks or tractor trailer)
(11) Alcoholic beverage sales for off-premise consumption with convenience stores and automobile service stations, and restaurants, hotels, extended stay hotels, and conference facilities with alcohol beverage sales for on-premises consumption pursuant to Section 9.240.490.

D. Legally established uses. It is the intent of the City Council that a legally established pre-existing land use of an occupied property shall not assume a nonconforming status as a result of the adoption of the 2017 General Plan and the concurrent or subsequent adoption of a chang e of zone for consistency with the 2017 General Plan. Any pre-existing use certified pursuant to Section 9.240.080 that is not specifically listed in subsections A. and B. shall be considered a permitted or conditionally permitt ed use the same as provided for such use under the zoning classification of the subject property prior to the adoption of the new zoning classification concurrent with, or subsequent to, the effective date of City Council Resolution No. 2017 -14 adopting the 2017 General Plan. The expansion of significant modification of such a pre -existing use shall be subject to the approval process and zoning requirements that had governed the category of use in which it fell under the prior zoning classification. However, nothing in this subsection shall be construed to mean that a site development permit or conditional use permit is required to continue such pre -existing use. ( Ord. No. 2017-09 , § 5, 9-21-2017; Ord. No. 2021-09 , § 4, 4-15-2021; Ord. No. 2021-21 , §§ 15—18, 11-4-2021; Ord. No. 2021-29 , § 11, 12-16-2021; Ord. No. 2022-10 , § 4, 7-7-2022; Ord. No. 2022-24 , § 8, 12-15-2022)

Created: 2023-12-12 09:28:13 [EST]
( Supp. No. 18)

Page 4 of 5 ends

Sec. 9.112.030. Development standards.

The following shall be the standards of development in the B-P Zone:
(1) Lot size. The minimum lot size shall be one-half (0.5) acre (twenty-one thousand seven hundred eighty (21,780)) square feet with a minimum average lot width of one hundred (100) feet, minimum average lot depth of one hundred (100) feet and minimum lot frontage width of fifty (50) feet. (2) Floor area ration (FAR). The building floor area ration shall be a minimum of .25 FAR and a maximum of .6 FAR.
(3) Height. The maximum height of all structures, including buildings, shall be thirty -five (35) feet at each setback line. Any portion of a structure that exceeds thirty-five (35) feet in height shall be set back from each setback line not less than two (2) feet for each one (1) foot in height that is in excess of thirty-five (35) feet. All buildings and structures shall not exceed fifty (50) feet in height. (4) Landscaping. A minimum eighteen (18) percent of the net area of the site (exclusive of right -of-way) shall be landscaped and maintained, and automatic irrigation shall be installed. (5) Street setbacks. A minimum twenty-five (25) foot setback shall be required on any street. A minimum fifteen (15) foot strip adjacent to the street line shall be landscaped and maintained, except for designated pedestrian and vehicular accessways. The remainder of the setb ack may be used for off- street automobile parking, driveways, or landscaping. Screen walls are prohibited in the street setback area.
(6) Side yard setbacks. The minimum side yard setback shall equal not less than ten (10) feet for the two (2) side lot areas combined.
(7) Rear yard setback. The minimum rear yard setback shall be fifteen (15) feet. (8) Other setbacks. A minimum one hundred (100) foot setback shall be required on any boundary where the business park property abuts a residential or commercially zoned property. A minimum of twenty (20) feet of the setback shall be landscaped. The other setback area may al so be used for trails, bicycle, motorcycle and automobile parking, trash/recycling enclosure, driveways or landscaping. Block walls or other fencing may be required.
(9) Screening. Parking, loading, trash and service areas shall be screened by structures or landscaping.

They shall be located in such a manner as to minimize noise or odor nuisance. Block walls or other fencing may be required.
(10) Perimeter screen walls. Perimeter screen walls are prohibited in the street setback area. A fully landscaped area shall be provided in front of a perimeter screen wall adjacent to any street. The minimum height of a perimeter screen wall shall be eight (8) feet. All screen walls shall be decorative masonry block walls and include an anti-graffiti coating or equivalent measures to prevent graffiti. (11) Security Fence. Barbed wire, concertina and similar fence are prohibited. (12) Outside storage. Outside storage as described in Section 9.10.950 shall not exceed twenty (20) percent of the site and shall be completely screened from public view by a combination of buildings, decorative masonry block walls, berms and landscaping. Outside storage areas shall be prohibited within the twenty-five (25) feet street setback.
(13) Parking. Parking shall be provided as required by Section 9.240.120. (14) Utilities. All new utilities shall be underground.

Created: 2023-12-12 09:28:13 [EST]
( Supp. No. 18)

Page 5 of 5 ends

(15) Roof-mounted equipment. All roof mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened from public view. (16) Signs. All signs shall be in conformance with Chapter 9.245 and be maintained in safe and presentable condition at all times including repainting, replacement of parts, and other maintenance activities (17) Site lighting. All lighting, including spotlights, floodlights, electrical reflectors, and other means of illumination for signs, structures, landscaping, parking, loading, unloading, and similar areas shall be focused, directed, and arranged to prevent glare or direct illumination on streets or adjoining property. (18) Maintenance. All properties, buildings, outside storage areas, landscaping, walls, trash enclosures, accessory structures, signs, and overall grounds shall be maintained in a safe and presentable condition at all times including repainting, replacement of parts or structures, cleaning, and other maintenance activities.
(19) Architecture. Business park development shall be constructed with high-quality architecture designed to enhance and be architecturally compatible with its surroundings. Exemplary architecture, landscaping, sign and site plan design shall be provided within designated s cenic highways or public view corridors.
( Ord. No. 2017-09 , § 5, 9-21-2017; Ord. No. 2022-10 , § 4, 7-7-2022)

P
age |1
ST

AFF REPORT
DATE: M ARCH 21, 2024
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD B. BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO . 15.B

PUBLIC HEARING TO ACCEPT PUBLIC COMMENT AND CONSIDER

THE ANALYIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE STUDY CONDUCTED BY GRC ASSOCIATES, INC.

RECOMMENDATION
1) That the City Council conduct a public hearing and accept public comments related to the City of Jurupa Valley’s Draft 2024 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice Study; and
2) T
hat the City Council receive and File the Draft 2024 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice Study.

BACKGROUND
In accordance with the City’s CDBG entitlement program, the Federal Department of Housing & Urban Development (“HUD”) requires communities to perform an Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice Study (“AI”) every five years, in order to affirmatively further the policies and purposes of the Fair Housing Act, also known as “af firmatively further fair housing” or “AFFH .” The AI study outlines fair housing concerns, such as discrimination in lending practices or governmental barriers to housing that disproportionally impact persons who belong to state and federally identified protected classes.

H
UD identifies impediments to fair housing choice as:
• Any actions, omissions, or decisions taken because of race, color, ancestry, national origin, religion, sex, disability, marital status, familial status, or any other arbitrary factor which restrict housing choices or the availability of housing choices; or

RETURN TO AGENDA

Page | 2

Any actions, omissions, or decisions which have the effect of restricting housing choices or the availability of housing choices on the basis of race, color, ancestry, national origin, religion, sex, disability, marital status, familial status, or any other arbitrary factor.

The AI assesses how a variety of conditions in a community may contribute to instances of housing discrimination based on the aforementioned factors . Specific conditions such as laws, governmental policies, housing planning and practices, and lending activities can result in impediments to fair housing choice. The purpose of the AI is to identify those conditions and determine what potential actions could mitigate or eliminate the effects of those conditions.

This is a highly specialized research report that required the City to enter into a consulting agreement with GRC Associates, Inc. to perform the AI. The agreement by and between the City of Jurupa Valley and GRC Associates, Inc. (“GRC”) was authorized by the City Council on June 1, 2023. The agreement tasked GRC with performing a variety of activities that would eventually be summarized in the AI study document. Those tasks included:
• Perform a hol istic review of all federal, state, and local laws that potentially contribute to fair housing choice impediments in the City of Jurupa Valley. • Assess the City of Jurupa Valley’s long -term planning documents and policies related to housing (planning process, zoning, land-use policies, etc.). • Examine private lending data generated through the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (“HDMA”) and the provision of brokerage services, mortgage lending, underwriting and insurance sales, property appraisal, and property management. • Conduct a cross section of interviews with key housing policy stakeholders in the City such as the City Manager, Community Development Director, Planning Manager, Housing Manager, Economic Development staff, Code Enforcement staff, Riverside County Sheriff’s Department staff, Fair Housing Council of Riverside County (contracted by the City of Jurupa Valley), and other key stakeholders identified by the consultant.
• Organize up to two community meetings to facilitate discussion, gather evidence, and present information related to the AI.
• Generate a final report that includes research findings, impediments to fair housing choice (if identified), and potential mitigation or elimination remedies. Present final report to the City Council.

The Draft 20 24 Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice Study (“Draft AI”) was completed by GRC in February of 2024. The Draft AI was reviewed by a variety of City staff members who provided comments and recommended changes to the document.

Page | 3

Consistent with HUD requir ements, the Draft AI document was uploaded to the City’s website by February 19, 20 24 to facilitate the required 30- day public comment period.

The Draft AI was also published in paper form at City Hall, the Louis Robidoux Library, and the Glen Avon Library. A formal notice advertising the 30-day public comment period was published in the Press Enterprise newspaper on February 19, 2024.

ANALYSIS

GRC conducted extensive research on the City of Jurupa Valley’s policies that have the potential to impact fair housing choice in the community. As is typical of AI studies conducted by other entitlement communities, the City’s AI study included a signific ant public engagement component. To satisfy the public engagement component of the AI, GRC worked with City staff to establish goals that could be achieved by providing genuine public participation opportunities throughout the study process. Those goals were:

(1) Provide an opportunity for both property owners and tenants to learn about fair housing requirements that have the potential to impact their business, property, or living arrangement.

(2) Invite property owners and residents to submit recommendations that could strengthen the goals of fair housing without creating an unnecessary burden on property owners or residents.

(3) Provide a convenient opportunity for property owners and residents to provide input while accommodating potential language barriers.

To satisfy the first two goals, GRC and City staff facilitated two public workshops offered at City Hall. The workshops were held on December 12, 2023 at 3:00 PM and December 19, 20 23 at 6:30 PM. The workshops served as educational oppor tunities for both property owners and tenants that reside within the city. Property owners and residents were encouraged to ask questions and provide feedback for GRC at each of the public workshops.

To satisfy the third goal of providing a convenient opportunity for property owners and residents to submit feedback, GRC helped the City facilitate a survey effort. The survey document was provided in both paper and electronic (online) format. Both the paper and electronic versions of the survey were available in English or Spanish. The City received over thirty responses to the survey.

Beyond the public engagement component, GRC conducted a technical analysis for five sections of the AI.

(1) Community Profile – Basic overview of the City of Jurupa Valley’s his tory, demographics, transportation system, housing stock, and economy.

Page | 4

(2) Mortgage and Lending Practices – Overview of Federal, State, and other regulations impacting the property lending industry. Technical and statistical analysis of lending patterns to assess instances or patterns of discrimination.

(3) Public Policies and Practices – Review of land-use, zoning, and building standards that have the potential to adversely impact the goals of fair housing ( i.e.:
exclusionary zoning).

(4) Fair Housing Practices – Assessment of the City’s current climate for fair housing.

Includes a review of housing organizations (real estate groups, associations, etc.) and the City’s contract agreement with the Fair Housing Council of Riverside County, Inc.

(5) Progress Achieved within the Past Five Years – Overview of the City’s progress in addressing fair housing issues presented in previous AI’s.

The full results of these technical sections are described in the Draft AI (Attachment A).

GRC used these technical reviews to formulate recommendations, which are located at the conclusion of the Draft AI document. In summary, the major findings and recommendations provided by the AI study are:

• There have not been housing discrimination cases filed by Jurupa Vally residents within the current fiscal year.

• At the two public meetings held at City Hall – there were no instances of residents bringing up cases of housing discrimination.

• The discriminatory practice of redlining was also noted for not being an issue in Jurupa Valley.

• Since Jurupa Valley’s population has a significant Hispanic population, over 72 percent, continue to perform education and outreach to raise awareness about the City’s fair housing resources to the Hispanic community.

• Continue to work with the Fair Housing Council of Riverside County, Inc. (or alternate service provider) to enforce fair housing requirements and improve upon the program.

• Continue to make modest adjustments to the City’s land -use and zoning policies that result in more inclusive housing stock.

• Continue to implement General Plan and State regulatory actions that result in a greater variety of housing choices (mixed use, various densities, etc.).

Page | 5

• In addition, pursuant to California state law – the California Housing and Community Development Department (HCD) has reviewed Jurupa Valley’s 2021- 2029 Housing Element and determined the City’s residential land use regulations and procedures do not serve as a constraint, and have certified the City’s Housing Element as in compliance with State law. As part of the Housing Element work, the City conducted a Fair Housing Assessment, as required by HCD’s AFFH guidelines, which establishes a comprehensive set of goals and policies to address the City’s housing needs.

The complete details of these recommendations are located in the Draft AI document.

FINANCIAL IMPACT

There is no fiscal impact as a result of this action. The consultant costs for performing the AI study were included in the City’s CDBG budget for the 20 23-2024 fiscal year.

These activities were funded through the City's CDBG Special Revenue Account 240-2400- 54110.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Provide Staff with alternate direction

************************** SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE********************

Analysis of Impediments to
Fair Housing Choice 2024-2029

February 16, 2024

City of Jurupa Valley
City Manager’s Office
8930 Limonite Avenue
Jurupa Valley, CA 92509

Acknowledgment
The City of Jurupa Valley and the City Manager’s office staff would like to extend its gratitude to all the individuals and agencies that made this report possible. The following are organizations and individuals who were instrumental in assisting with the formulation of this report by lending their time and/or respected advice. We are grateful for their assistance.

City Mayor
Guillermo Silva

City Council
Brian Berkson, Mayor Pro Tempore
Leslie Altamirano
Chris Barajas
Armando Carmona

City Manager
Rod B. Butler

Michael Flad, Assistant City Manager
Joe Perez, Community Development Director
Paul Toor, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Sean Vickers, Chief of Police
Amy Sells, Deputy City Manager
Connie Cardenas, Director of Administrative Services

Consultant
GRC Associates, Inc.

Finally, we would like to give a special thanks to the citizens of Jurupa Valley who provided us with critical survey information relating to their fair housing experience. Their participation was essential in shaping this analysis, which will influence fair housing activities in the City of Jurupa Valley for years to come.

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice

Contents
Section Page

1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1 Fair Housing .......................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose of Report ................................................................................................................ 3 Organization of Report ......................................................................................................... 4 Reporting Staff and Data Sources......................................................................................... 4 Public Participation ............................................................................................................... 5

2. Jurupa Valley Profile .................................................................................................................... 8 Population Profile ................................................................................................................. 8 Household Characteristics .................................................................................................. 17 Employment ....................................................................................................................... 23 Housing Characteristics ...................................................................................................... 26 Special Needs ...................................................................................................................... 28 Public Transit System .......................................................................................................... 37 Public Assisted Housing ...................................................................................................... 44

3. Mortgage Lending Practices ...................................................................................................... 47 Lending Laws and Regulations ........................................................................................... 47 Overall Lending Patterns .................................................................................................... 49 Lending Practices ................................................................................................................ 60

4. Public Policies and Practices ..................................................................................................... 62 City Policies and Programs Affecting Housing Development ............................................. 62

5. Fair Housing Practices ............................................................................................................... 89 Fair Housing Practices in the Homeownership Market ...................................................... 89 Fair Housing Practices in the Rental Housing Market ........................................................ 97 Fair Housing Profile: Evaluation and Assessment ............................................................ 101

6. Progress Since 2018 ................................................................................................................. 107

7. Conclusions and Recommendations ....................................................................................... 109 Summary of Conclusions/Impediments ........................................................................... 113 Recommended Actions to Address Impediments ............................................................ 115

Appendix A: Public Notice Affidavit, Community Outreach, Sign-In Sheets and Public Presentation
Appendix B: Fair Housing Survey and Results
Appendix C: Public Comments
City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice

List of Tables
Page
Table 2-1 Age Distribution and Median Age (2022) .............................................................. 14 Table 2-2 Race – Ethnicity – City of Jurupa Valley (2022) ...................................................... 16 Table 2-3 Jurupa Valley Household Tenure ........................................................................... 17 Table 2-4 2023 HUD and State Income Limits for Riverside County ..................................... 18 Table 2-5 Household Income (2022) ...................................................................................... 19 Table 2-6 Education Level of Residents Age 25 and Older(2022) ......................................... 22 Table 2-7 Jurupa Valley Employment (2022) ......................................................................... 24 Table 2-8 Major Employment Centers in Jurupa Valley ........................................................ 25 Table 2-9 Composition of Housing Stock (2022) .................................................................... 26 Table 2-10 Housing Units by Year Structure Built (2022) ........................................................ 27 Table 2-11 City of Jurupa Valley Regional Housing Needs Assessment(2021-29) ................... 28 Table 2-12 Jurupa Valley Owner and Renter Size of Households (2022) ............................... 30 Table 2-13 Single-Parent Households and Poverty (2022) ...................................................... 31 Table 2-14 Persons with Disabilities (2022) ............................................................................. 32 Table 2-15 Overcrowding and Overpaying in Jurupa Valley (2022) ........................................ 35 Table 2-16 HUD Fair Market Rent – Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario MSA(2022-23) ......... 36 Table 2-17 FY 2023 Section 8 Income Limits - Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario MSA ......... 37 Table 2-18 RTA Fares (2024) .................................................................................................... 41 Table 2-19 Metrolink Fares, Jurupa Valley/Pedley Station to Riverside-Downtown(2024) .... 43 Table 2-20 Licensed Residential Care Facilities ....................................................................... 46 Table 3-1 Home Purchase Loans by Race and Ethnicity in Jurupa Valley (2022) .................. 52 Table 3-2 Home Purchase Loans – Denials by Race/Ethnicity (2018-22) .............................. 53 Table 3-3 Refinance Loans – Denials by Race/Ethnicity (2018-2022) ................................... 54 Table 3-4 Home Improvement Loans – Denials by Race/Ethnicity (2018-2022) ................... 55 Table 3-5 Home Purchase Loans – Compared to Pop. Race/Ethnicity (2022) ....................... 56 Table 3-6 Disposition of Home Purchase Loans – Compared to Pop. Race/Ethnicity, Percentages (2022) ................................................................................................ 57 Table 3-7 Top 15 Home Purchase Lenders in City of Jurupa Valley (2022) ........................... 58 Table 3-8 Purchase Loans by Income and Gender in City of Jurupa Valley (2022)................ 59 Table 4-1 Residential Land-Use Designations ........................................................................ 63 Table 4-2 Residential Development Standards ...................................................................... 65 Table 4-3 Residential Parking Standards ............................................................................... 66 Table 4-4 Jurupa Valley Permitted Uses by Zone .................................................................. 71 Table 4-5 City of Jurupa Valley Housing Element Goals and Policies .................................... 78 Table 4-6 City of Jurupa Valley Planning Fees ....................................................................... 86 Table 4-7 Residential Development Impact Fees (Per Unit) .................................................. 87 Table 5-1 Hate Crimes Incidents (2022) ............................................................................... 105 Table 7-1 Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Implementation Status (2023) ................ 113

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice

List of Figures
Page
Figure 2-1 City of Jurupa Valley and Communities ....................................................................... 9 Figure 2-2 Population Growth of Jurupa Valley ........................................................................... 10 Figure 2-3 Racial/Ethnic Minority Concentration by Jurupa Valley Census Tracts ...................... 11 Figure 2-4 2022 Low/Mod Income Areas by Census Jurupa Valley Census Block Group ............ 20 Figure 2-5 2023 Family Households Below the Citywide Average Poverty Level by Census Block Group .......................................................................................................................... 21 Figure 2-6 Riverside Transit Agency Bus Lines ............................................................................. 39 Figure 2-7 Metrolink Commuter Rail System .............................................................................. 42 Figure 4-1 General Plan Land Use Map ....................................................................................... 64

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
1 I. Introduction
Equal access to housing is fundamental to each person in meeting essential needs and pursuing personal, educatio nal, employment or other goals. In recogni zing equal housing access as a fundamental right, the federal government and the State of California have both established fair housing choice as a right protected by law.

This report presents a demographic profile of the City of Jurupa Valley, assesses the extent of housing needs among specific income groups and evaluates the availability of a range of housing choices for residents. This report also analyzes the conditions in the private market and the public sector that could limit the range of housing choices or impede a person’s access to housing. As the name of the report suggests, the document reviews “impediments” to fair housing. Although this report also assesses the nature and extent of housing discrimination, it primarily focuses on identifying impediments that could prevent equal housing access and developing solutions to mitigate or remove such impediments.

Fair Housing
Federal fair housing laws prohibit discrimination in the sale, rental or lease of housing, and in negotiations for real property, based on race, color, religion, sex, national origin, familial status and disability. California fair housing laws build on the federal laws , including age, marital status, ancestry, source of income, sexual orientation, and “any arbitrary discrimination” as the protected categories under the laws. The following definition is used for this report:
“Fair housing describes a condition in which indiv iduals of similar income levels in the same housing market have like ranges of choice available to them regardless of race, color, ancestry, national origin, religion, sex, disability, age, marital status, familial status, source of income, sexual orientation, or any other arbitrary factor.” Fair Housing Legal Framework
The federal Fair Housing Act of 1968 and the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988 (42 U.S. Code §§ 3601-3619, 3631) are federal fair housing laws that prohibit discrimination in all a spects of housing, such as the sale, rental, lease or negotiation for real property. The Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex and national origin.

In 1988, the Fair Housing Act was amended to extend protection to familial status and people with disabilities (mental or physical). In addition, the Amendment s Act provides for “reasonable accommodations,” allowing structural modifications for persons with disabilities, if requested, at their own expense, for all dwellings to accommodate the physically disabled.

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
2 The California Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH) enforce s California laws that provide protection and monetary relief to victims of unlawful housing practices. The Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA; Part 2.8 of the California Government Code, Code Sections 12900-12996) prohibit discrimination and harassment in housing practices.

The Unruh Act (California Government Code Section 51) protects Californians from discrimination in publi c accommodations and requires equal access to the accommodations. The Unruh Act provides broad protection and has been held by the courts to prohibit any arbitrary discrimination on the basis of personal characteristics or traits, and applies to a range of types of housing.

The Ralph Civil Rights Act (California Civil Code Section 51.7) prohibits violence and threats of violence and specifies that housing situations are protected under this Act, which includes houses, apartments, hotels, boarding housing and condominiums. Violators of the Ralph Act can be sued for actual or emotional damages, in addition to civil penalties.

The Bane Civil Rights Act (California Civil Code Section 52.1) provides another layer of protection for fair housing choice by protecting all people in California from interference by force or threat of force with an individual’s constitutional or statutory rights, including a right to equal access to housing. The Bane Act also includes criminal penalties for hate crimes. However, convictions under the act are not allowed for speech alone unless that speech itself threatened violence.

In addition to these acts, California Government Code Sections 111135, 65008 and 65589.5 prohibit discrimination in programs funded by the state and in any land-use decisions.1 Housing Issues, Affordability and Fair Housing
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity Division distinguishes between housing affordability and fair housing. Economic factors that affect a household’s housing choices are not fair housing issues per se. Only when the relationship between household income, household type, race/ethnicity and other factors create misconceptions, biases and differential treatment would fair housing concerns arise.

Tenant/landlord disputes are also typical ly not related to fair housing. Most disputes between tenants and landlords result from a lack of understanding by either one or both parties regarding their rights and responsibilities. Tenant/landlord disputes and housing discrimination cross paths when fair housing laws are violated and result in differential treatment.

What Is an Impediment to Fair Housing Choice?
According to HUD’s Fair Housing Planning Guide, and based within the legal framework of federal and state laws, impediments to fair housing choice are:
▪ Any actions, omissions or decisions taken because of race, color, ancestry, national origin, religion, sex, disability, age, marital status, familial status, source of income, sexual

1Fair Housing Hotline Project, Legal Services of Northern California. (March 2004). “Fair Housing in California: Families with Children: A Manual for Housing Providers, Tenants and Advocates.” City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
3 orientation or any other arbitrary factor that restricts housing choices or the availability of housing choices, or
▪ Any actions, omissions or decisions that have the effect of restricting housing choices or the availability of housing choices on the basis of race, color, ancestry, national origin, religion, sex, disability, age, marital status, familial status, source of income, sexual orientation or any other arbitrary factor.

To affirmatively promote equal housing opportunity, a community must work to remove impediments to fair housing choice. Furthermore, eligibility for certain federal funds requires compliance with federal fair housing laws. Specifically, to receive HUD Community Planning and Development (CPD) formula grants, a jurisdiction must:
▪ Certify its commitment to actively further fair housing choice. ▪ Maintain fair housing records.
▪ Conduct an Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (AI) or Assessment of Fair Housing (AFH).

In addition, the City of Jurupa Valley, as part of the process to have its the Housing Element certified by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD), completed Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) requirements. The goal of AFFH is to combat housing discrimination, eliminate racial bias, undo historic patterns of segregation and lift barriers that restrict access in order to foster inclusive communities and achieve racial equality, fair housing choice, and opportunities for all residents.

Purpose of Report
This Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (AI) provides an overview of laws, regulations, conditions and other possible obstacles that could either affect an individual’s or a household’s access to housing in the City of Jurupa Valley. The AI includes:
▪ A comprehensive review of Jurupa Valley’s laws, regulations and administrative policies , procedures and practices , a s well as an assessment of how they affect the location, availability and accessibility of housing; and
▪ An assessment of conditions, both public and private, affecting fair housing choice.

The scope of analysis and the format used for this AI adhere to recommendations contained in the Fair Housing Planning Guide developed by HUD.

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
4 Organization of Report
The AI is divided into six sections:

Section 1: Introduction defines fair housing and explains the purpose of this report.

Section 2: Jurupa Valley Profile presents the demographic, housing and income characteristics in Jurupa Valley . Major employers and transportation access to job centers are identified. The relationships among these variables are discussed.

Section 3: Mortgage Lending Practices analyzes private activities that could impede fair housing choices in Jurupa Valley.

Section 4: Public Policies and Practices evaluate various public policies and actions that could impede fair housing choices in Jurupa Valley.

Section 5: Fair Housing Practices evaluates the fair housing services available to residents and identifies fair housing complaints and violations in Jurupa Valley.

Section 6: Progress Since 2018 summarizes private and public sector impediments identified in the prior regional AI and the progress in implementing actions to address these impediments.

Section 7: Conclusions and Recommendations provide conclusions and recommendations about fair housing issues in Jurupa Valley.

At the end of this report, a page is attached that includes the endorsement of the City Manager and a statement certifying that the AI represents Jurupa Valley’s official conclusions regarding impediments to fair housing choice and the actions necessary to address these impediments.

Reporting Staff and Data Sources
This report, prepared through a collabor ative effort between the City staff and GRC Associates, Inc., under contract to the City of Jurupa Valley, is funded through Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds.

The following data sources were used to complete this AI. Sources of specific information are identified in the text and tables.
▪ City of Jurupa Valley 2023-2028 Consolidated Plan
▪ City of Jurupa Valley General Plan (adopted September 7, 2017) ▪ City of Jurupa Valley Final Housing Element of the General Plan, approved by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) on April 22, 20 22. This City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
5 Housing Element was prepared to meet the State of California’s 6th Cycle Housing Element Update Planning Period from October 15, 2021 to October 15, 2029. ▪ HUD FY 2023 and 2024 Fair Market Rents & Section 8 Limits ▪ Jurupa Valley Annual Progress Report (APR) for HCD, 2024 (shows progress City has made in Affirmative Fair Housing (AFFH) programs
▪ Riverside County Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 2019 ▪ Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) - 2024
▪ Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) 2012 -2035 Regional Growth Forecast
▪ SCAG 2022 Local Profiles
▪ SCAG Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA 6th Cycle, 2021-2029) ▪ California Department of Finance Population and Housing Estimates (2023) ▪ U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 and 2020
▪ U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (2018-2023) ▪ U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy Data (CHAS) 2020
▪ California Employment Development Department (2012 - 2023) ▪ Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (2023)
▪ California Department of Social Services Community Care Licensing Division (2023)

Public Participation
This AI has been developed to provide an overview of laws, regulations, conditions or other possible obstacles that could affect an individual’s or a household’s access to housing. As part of this effort, the report incorporates the issues and concerns of residents, housing professionals and service providers. To assure that the report responds to community needs, the development of the AI includes a community outreach program consisting of community meetings, a n on-line survey, service provider interviews and City Council public hearing. Appendix A – shows the City’s community fair housing outreach efforts, such as publicizing the p ublic hearing (public n otice affidavit), community outreach on City’s web page and social media accounts , sign-in sheets and public presentation at the community meetings.

Community Meetings
Residents, businesses, and public and private agencies were invited to participate in the discussion of fair housing issues in Jurupa Valley. Two community meetings were conducted on the following dates and locations:

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
6 ▪ Dec. 12, 2023 — Jurupa Valley City Hall, 8930 Limonite Ave., 3:00 p.m. ▪ Dec. 19, 2023 — Jurupa Valley City Hall, 8930 Limonite Ave., 6:00 p.m.

The meetings provided opportunities for Jurupa Valley residents to gain awareness of fair housing laws, and for residents and service agencies to share fair housing issues and concerns. To ensure that the fair housing concerns of low - and moderate-income and special needs residents were addressed, individual invitation letters were distributed via mail and email, if available, to agencies and organizations that serve the low - and moderate-income and special needs community. In addition, community meeting notices were posted on the City’s website at www.jurupavalley.org, other places, such as City’s Facebook and social media pages and notices of meetings were posted conspicuously at City Hall and the two City libraries. As a result of an extensive outreach effort, attendance at the public meetings included persons from social services – fair housing, property management, in addition to residents.

Community Fair Housing Survey
To supplement the community meeti ngs and to assist in further understanding the fair housing issues in the City, a Fair Housing Survey was made available to Jurupa Valley residents at City Hall and online via th e City’s website. In addition, surveys were available at stra tegic locations throughout the City by staff. Spanish versions of the survey were provided to reflect the diversity of Jurupa Valley’s residents. During the November 13, 2023 to December 20, 2023 survey period, surveys were completed online or hardcopies were submitted by Jurupa Valley residents.

The survey consisted of questions designed to gather information on a person’s experience with fair housing issues and perception of fair housing issues in his/her neighborhood. Given the significant Hispanic population in Jurupa Valley – the fair housing survey was also in Spanish.

Copies of the survey in English and Spanish and a summary of the results are included in Appendix B.

Service Provider Meetings
In addition, the City met with various non-profit and housing organizations, including the Fair Housing Council of Riverside County, Path of Life Ministries Homeless Services and others to provide and receive information on the de velopment of the AI. Input from the various organizations provided in-depth context and insight into housing conditions and fair housing issues for residents in Jurupa Valley.

Public Review
During a 30-day public review period (February 19, 2024 to March 21, 2024), the draft AI document was made available at the following locations:
▪ Jurupa Valley City Hall / City Clerk, 8930 Limonite Ave., Jurupa Valley, CA 92509 ▪ The Jurupa Valley Libraries (Louis Robidoux and Glen Avon):

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
7 ▪ Louis Robidoux: 5840 Mission Blvd.,
▪ Glen Avon: 9244 Galena St.
▪ Jurupa Valley City website (www.jurupavalley.org)
Notice of public review was published in the Press Enterprise, the newspaper serving Jurupa Valley residents and posted conspicuously at City Hall and two libraries, and also the City’s website. There were no written comments received from the public during the 30-day, public review period from February 19, 2024 to March 21, 2024.

Public Hearing
A public hearing before the Jurupa Valley City Council will be held on March 21, 2024 to accept community input on the Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 2024-2029, before the City Council considered approval of the documents. There were no comments from the public and subsequently, the City Council voted __- __ to accept the AI. (See Appendix C.) Key Issues Identified
Key issues identified from public outreach efforts, including the resident survey, advisory meetings and interviews with service providers offered insight into the following issues and recent trends related to fair housing in the City of Jurupa Valley:
▪ Fair Housing Council of Riverside County (FHCRC), which is Jurupa Valley’s fair housing outreach provider, stated that they have not received any housing discrimination complaints during the current fiscal year . Most of thei r complaints are related to other landlord-tenant issues.
▪ At the outreach meetings, t here were no residents that attended that had filed a case against housing discrimination. Residents were also not aware of any discrimination occurring at their neighborhoods.
▪ Other issues were brought up regarding homeless and rents being increased significantly in the community.
▪ The discriminatory practice of redlining was also noted for not being an issue in Jurupa Valley.

There were a total of 32 surveys that were completed – including one survey being submitted in Spanish. Most surveys were completed by property owners ( 83.3%) and females (74.1%).

Regarding racial composition, surveys submitted by race were White ( 60.1%), Black ( 6.7%), Asian (3.3%) and American Indian/Alaska Native (3.3%). Hispanics, categorized as an ethnicity by the US Census Bureau were 60.0% of respondents. Approximately 16.1% of people responding to the surveys said they encountered h ousing discrimination. Most of these respondents said the type of discrimination they faced was being refused, discouraged, or charged more to buy or rent a housing unit. Out of the 5 respondents that said they faced housing discrimination, three said areas of Jurupa Valley, the rest were in other cities. Housing survey results are in Appendix B.

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
8 2. Jurupa Valley Profile
This chapter provides demographic, socioeconomic and housing profiles of the City of Jurupa Valley. It highlights recent demographic and socioeconomic trends, assesses the extent of housing needs and availability among specific income groups and persons with special needs, and identifies major employers, available public transit services, public housing, and community care facilities.

The data-based analysis of the City is integral in evaluating housing demands and potential fair housing issues for the City.

The City of Jurupa Valley was incorporated on July 1, 2011, making it one of the newest cities in California. As such, Jurupa Valley was not identified as a city in the 2010 decennial census, though it was identified in the 2020 census. Key data sources for the chapter include: U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS), California Department of Finance (DOF), California Department of Social Services Community Care Licensing Division, Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), California Employment Development Department (EDD), and information provided in the 2018 City of Jurupa Valley Five -Year Consolidated Plan (ConPlan). Other sources are identified in this AI chapter.

Population Profile
Population Growth
The City of Jurupa Valley, known as the “A Community of Communities ,” covers 44-square miles in northwest Riverside County and encompasses the communities of Jurupa Hills, Mira Loma, Glen Avon, Pedley, Indian Hills, Belltown, Sunnyslope, Crestmore Heights, and Rubidoux. A map of the City and its nine communities are shown on Figure 2-1
The City of Jurupa Valley has a 2023 population of 104,983 residents, per California Department of Finance figures. The level of population growth experience in the City is presented in Figure 2-

2. According to the SCAG Regional Growth Forecast, the City is forecast to increase to approximately 117,800 residents by 2045, an increase of 12.2 percent from 2023.

Racial / Ethnic concentrations are shown in Figure 2-3. According to the US Census, Hispanics are not a race, but an ethnicity, and can be of any race. The Hispanic population of Jurupa Valley is concentrated in western and astern boundaries of the City. The White, non -Hispanic population and the Asian population are concentrated mostly in the center section of the City. The African American population is primarily concentrated in the Rubidoux community. The Native American and Hawaiian / Pacific Islander population groups do not show areas of concentration in the City. .

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
9 Figure 2-1
City of Jurupa Valley and Communities

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
10 Figure 2-2

Source: DOF E-4 2023 Estimates

104,600
104,700
104,800
104,900
105,000
105,100
105,200
2020 2021 2022 2023
Jurupa Valley Population
2020 to 2023
City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
11 Figure 2-3
Racial / Ethnic Concentrations – Jurupa Valley – by Census Tract

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
12 Figure 2-3 (Continued)
Racial / Ethnic Concentrations – Jurupa Valley – by Census Tract

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
13 Figure 2-3 (Continued)
Racial / Ethnic Concentrations – Jurupa Valley – by Census Tract

Source: HUD, CPD Mapping Tool, 2023

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
14 Age Composition
An analysis of the age distribution is important because it affects the future need for jobs, housing and social services. Table 2-1 details the age distribution of the Jurupa Valley’s 2022 population.

The age groups are designated as follows: Under 5 years (young chi ldren), 5-17 years (minors), 18-34 (young adults), 35 -54 (middle-age adults), 55 -64 (future elderly), 65 -74 (elderly), and 75 years and older (frail elderly). These age divisions are intended to give an overview of the distinctive housing and social service needs.

According to Table 2-1, over one-half (52.2%) of the City’s total population was under the age of 35 years in 2022. This age group typically consists of young children, students, recent graduates, or adults just entering the job market , which indicates that future planning may need to include additional schools, entry-level jobs, and starter homes. This age group is important because t he City has a younger overall population (median age of 3 3.5 years) as compared to the County (median ag e of 36.3 years). This indicates that the provision of smaller, affordable housing opportunities, particularly in the rental market, is needed in the near future to allow this cohort to remain in the community. Residents ages 35 to 64 years tend to drive the market demand for moderate to relatively high cost condominiums and single-family homes. People over 65 years of age, which accounted for 11.4 percent of the City’s total population, tend to generate demand for low- to moderate-cost apartments, condominiums, group quarters, and mobile hom es. S enior residents may also balance their housing options with the proximity to social services.

Table 2-1
Age Distribution and Median Age, 2022

Source: ACS 2018-2022
Number % of Total Number % of Total
Under 5 6,763 6.4% 146,356 6.0%
5-9 6,993 6.6% 161,783 6.7%
10-14 8,515 8.1% 181,112 7.5%
15-19 8,450 8.0% 178,591 7.4%
20-24 8,566 8.1% 167,645 6.9%
25-34 15,884 15.0% 335,249 13.8%
35-44 14,497 13.7% 320,945 13.2%
45-54 12,509 11.8% 297,553 12.2%
55-59 5,809 5.5% 145,865 6.0%
60-64 5,677 5.4% 135,226 5.6%
65-74 7,195 6.8% 205,753 8.5%
75-84 3,168 3.0% 112,833 4.6%
85 and Older 1,646 1.6% 40,576 1.7%
Total 105,672 100.0% 2,429,487 100.0%
Median Age
City of Jurupa Valley Riverside County
Age Group

33.5 36.3
City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
15 Another way to analyze the age group as is through the dependency ratio, which is the ratio of the population under 18 and over 65 years of age to the population 18 to 64 years. This ratio is an indicator of the reliance of children and senior citizens on the working age population. The range of the dependency ratio is measured from 0.0 (low) to 1.00 (high); the lower the dependency ratio, the lesser the “burden” is on a community’s working age residents. The dependency ratio is an important indication of the demand for social services and senior housing. According to Table 2- 1, the dependency ratio in 20 22 was 0.68 in Jurupa Valley, and 0. 73 in Riverside County. The County overall had a higher dependency ratio than Jurupa Valley.

Age and fair housing intersect when managers or property owners make housing decisions based on the age of residents. For example, managers and property owners may prefer to rent to mature residents, limit the number of children in their complex or discourage older residents due to their disabilities. Although a housing provider may establish reasonable occupancy limits and set reasonable rules about the behavior of tenants, those rules cannot single out children for restrictions that do not apply also to adults.

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
16 Race and Ethnicity
The race and ethnic composition of a population influence fair housing issues to the extent that certain racial and ethnic groups may experience discrimination. These influences are due to factors such as color, language spoken, or other cultural factors.

Table 2-2 presents the racial/ethnic breakdown of Jurupa Valley and Riverside County residents in 2022. According to the table, the Hispanic population represented the largest share of the City’s ethnic population at 72.0 percent, which was higher than the countywide share of 50.8 percent. (Hispanics are not considered a race by the US Census Bureau, but an ethnicity.) The White racial group in Jurupa Valley was 36.6 percent, followed by Asian at 4.5 percent and Black or African American at 3.4 percent. In comparison, the County figures were higher in the White, Black and Asian racial categories and less for the Hispanic ethnic category.

Table 2-2
Jurupa Valley Racial/Ethnicity 2022

Source: ACS 2018-2022

`
White 38,658 36.6% 1,138,018 46.8%
Black or African American 3,547 3.4% 157,125 6.5%
American Indian and Alaska
Native
1,237 1.2% 23,446 1.0%
Asian 4,754 4.5% 166,726 6.9%
Native Hawaiian and Other
Pacific Islander
259 0.2% 8,044 0.3%
Other Race 43,749 41.4% 574,403 23.6%
Two or more races 13,468 12.7% 361,725 14.9%
Total 105,672 100.0% 2,429,487 100.0%
Hispanic or Latino (any race) 76,033 72.0% 1,233,277 50.8% Jurupa Valley Riverside County
City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
17 Household Characteristics
Household Tenure
Table 2-3 shows that in 20 22, there were 2 7,343 total occupied housing units or households in Jurupa Valley, and of this total, about 75.0% were owner households and one -quarter (25.0%) were renter households. Home ownership increased during the past five -year period. This compares very closely with the County’s proportion of owner and renter households (6 8.6% and

31.4%, respectively).

Table 2-3
Jurupa Valley Household Tenure
Tenure
Jurupa Valley Riverside County
Occupied
Units % of Total
Occupied
Units % of Total
Owner 20,509 75.0% 527,528 68.6%
Renter 6,834 25.0% 241,947 31.4%
TOTAL 27,343 100.0% 769,475 100.0%
Source: ACS 2018-2022 (S2502)
Household Income
Household income is the most important factor determining a household’s ability to balance housing costs with other basic life necessities. Although economic factors that affect a household’s housing choice are not a fair housing issue per se, the relationships among household income, household type, race/ethnicity and other factors often create misconceptions and biases that raise fair housing issues.

Most state and federal housing programs are benchmarked to specific income limits. Consistent with federal regulations, income categories defined by HUD are: Extremely Low income (0-30% of Area Mean Income); Low income (31-50% of AMI); Moderate income (51-80% of AMI); and Above Moderate income (Greater than 80% of AMI). F ederal housing programs are not eligible to households earning greater than 80 percent of the AMI. Table 2-4 presents HUD and State income limits by income group for Riverside County.

The State of California also provides income limits that are annually updated in accordance with procedures established by HUD at the federal level. The State income limits apply to designated programs and are used to determine applicant eligibility and to calculate affordable housing costs for applicable housing assistance programs.

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
18 Table 2-4
2023 HUD and State Income Limits for Riverside County
Income Group Percent AMI
2023 Income Limit for
a 4-Person HH
HUD-
Extremely Low < 30% $27,950
Low 31% - 50% $46,600
Moderate 51%-80% $74,550
State
Extremely Low < 30% $27,950
Very Low 31% - 50% $46,600
Low 51%-80% $74,550
Source: HUD and State HCD, Income Limits 2023

Table 2-5 shows that in 2022 the median household income of Jurupa Valley ($91,562) was higher than the countywide household income ($ 84,505). Based on income grouping, 26.6 percent of Jurupa Valley households made less than $50,000 annually, 29.2 percent made $50, 000 to $99,999, and the remaining 44.3 percent made more than $100,000 annually. The table also shows that 10.3 percent of all Jurupa Valley family households had incomes in the past 12 months below the federal poverty level. In general, household incomes have increased significantly during the past five years in Jurupa Valley, with the poverty rate decreasing.

Figure 2-4 identifies the Low- and Moderate-income areas in the City of Jurupa Valley by Census Block Group. A Low- to Moderate-income area is defined as a Census Block Group with 51 percent or more Low - and M oderate-income persons. These are the area where CDBG funds can be utilized to provide public service and capital improvement projects. Figure 2-5 shows poverty levels by Census Block Groups.

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
19 Table 2-5
Household Income, 2022

Sources: ACS 2018-2022 and US Census

HHs % of Total HHs % of Total
Less than $10,000 649 2.5% 31,499 4.20%
$10,000 - $14,999 649 2.5% 20,999 2.80%
$15,000 - $24,999 1,324 5.1% 45,749 6.10%
$25,000 - $34,999 1,739 6.7% 49,498 6.60%
$35,000 - $49,999 2,544 9.8% 71,998 9.60%
$50,000 - $74,999 3,660 14.1% 113,996 15.20%
$75,000 - $99,999 3,920 15.1% 99,747 13.30%
$100,000 - $149,999 5,243 20.2% 145,495 19.40%
$150,000 - $199,999 3,193 12.3% 78,747 10.50%
$200,000 or more 3,063 11.8% 92,247 12.30%
Total 25,957 100% 749,976 100.00%
Median HH Income
Families HH in Past 12
Months Below Poverty
Level
Income Jurupa Valley Riverside County
$91,562 $84,505

10.30% 10.90%
City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
20 Source: City of Jurupa Valley, HUD, Census Bureau ACS 2018-2022 Figure 2-4
City of Jurupa Valley
2023 Low/Mod Income Areas by Census Block Group

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
21 Source: City of Jurupa Valley, HUD, 2023
Figure 2-5
2023 Family Households
Poverty Levels by Census Block Group

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
22 Education
It is important to recognize that education has been known to significantly affect the earning capacity of individuals. As presented in Table 2-6, 28.3 percent of Jurupa Valley residents age 25 and older did not graduate from high school as compared to only 16.9 percent countywide. While Jurupa Valley residents had a higher percentage of high school graduates (31.3) than the county (26.8%), they had a smaller percentage (4 0.3%) attaining some form of college education as compared to countywide residents at 56.4 percent.

Table 2-6
Education Level of Residents Age 25 and Older
Education Level
Jurupa Valley Riverside County
Number % of Total Number % of Total
Less than 9th Grade 10,047 15.1% 142,806 9.0%
9th to 12th Grade – No Diploma 8,754 13.2% 126,225 7.9% High School Graduate 20,800 31.3% 426,917 26.8%
Some College, No Degree 12,624 19.0% 378,021 23.7%
Associate Degree 4,454 6.7% 136,585 8.6%
Bachelor’s Degree 6,651 10.0% 244,893 15.4%
Graduate or Professional Degree 3,055 4.6% 138,553 8.7% TOTAL Population Age 25 66,385 100% 1,594,000 100%
Source: ACS 2018-2022 (S1501
Household Size
Household size is an important indicator of population growth and overcrowding in individual housing units. Typically, communities where there is a large younger population have larger families; on the other hand, communities with an aging population expe rience a declining household size. The size of a household or family can be a reflection of demographics or cultural of the residents. For instance, co-habitation of extended families may be encouraged, increases the household size. Younger families with children or extended families often prefer larger single- family homes, while single-person households or seniors may often occupy smaller apartments or condominiums due to the lower cost. Understanding changes in household composition can thus provide insight into current and future housing needs.

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
23 After a steady increase in the average household size locally and regionally – household size has been decreasing lately. The average household size in Jurupa Valley was 3.83 in 2012, 3.99 in 2019 and it decreased to 3.90 in 2022. Jurupa Valley’s household size has been consistently higher than the countywide and statewide averages.

Employment
Census employment data presented in Table 2-7, shows that in 2022 there were an estimated 48,366 Jurupa Valley residents working in various industries, with an unemployment rate of just

4.3 percent. These job figures include wage and salary jobs and jobs held by business owners and self-employed persons. In comparison, the unemployment rate was almost the same in Riverside County (4.1 percent).

The types of jobs of City residents show that educational services, health care/social assistance were the primary industries of residents. Retail, construction and transportati on were also key industries. These four job sectors combined for over one half of the total jobs of Jurupa Valley residents in 2022 . County figures were comparable, with less transportation, retail and construction jobs, compared to the figures from Jurupa Valley.

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
24 Table 2-7
Jurupa Valley Employment

Source: ACS 2018-22 (DP03)

Based on City of Jurupa data, the major employment centers in the City are presented in Table 2-

8. Nestle, with 8,874 employees and the Jurupa Unified School District (JUSD) with 2,149 classified or certified employees located at various schools and educational facilities througho ut the City – are the two largest employers. The largest number of JUSD employees is located at the Education Center at 4650 Pedley Road with 230 employees. Within the past five years, Amazon and Walmart have each brought in over 1,000 jobs into the City of Jurupa Valley.

Estimate % of Total Estimate % of Total
Employed 48,366 1,073,342
Unemployed 3,526 77,625
Unemployement Rate 4.3% 4.1%
Agriculture, forestry, fishing and
hunting, and mining 504 1.0% 13,820 1.3%
Construction 6,681 13.8% 101,452 9.5%
Manufacturing 4,779 9.9% 87,949 8.2%
Wholesale trade 1,879 3.9% 29,122 2.7%
Retail trade 6,329 13.1% 132,380 12.3%
Transportation and warehousing, and
utilities 5,414 11.2% 80,469 7.5%
Information 429 0.9% 16,570 1.5%
Finance and insurance, and real
estate and rental and leasing 2,328 4.8% 53,207 5.0%
Professional, scientific, and
management, and administrative and
waste management services
4,590 9.5% 109,795 10.2%
Educational services, and health care
and social assistance 7,341 15.2% 222,758 20.8%
Arts, entertainment, and recreation,
and accommodation and food
services
4,251 8.8% 117,720 11.0%
Other services, except public
administration 2,120 4.4% 52,551 4.9%
Public administration 1,721 3.6% 55,549 5.2%
Industry Jurupa Valley Riverside County
City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
25 Table 2-8
Major Employment Centers in Jurupa Valley
Name Address Number of
Employees
Nestle USA 3450 Dulles Dr 8,874
Jurupa Unified School District
Various location -- Education Center
(District Office) 4850 Pedley Road 2,149
Amazon Multiple Locations 1,102
Walmart Center 11888 Mission Blvd. 1,044
Toll Global Forwarding 3355 Dulles Dr. 800
Sierra Aluminum 2345 Fleetwood Drive 450
Skanska USA Civil West Ca Dist. 1995 Agua Mansa Road 702 Vista Pacific Center 3662 Pacific Ave. 600
An-Wil 2285 Fleetwood Dr. 575
Fed Ex Freight 12100 Riverside Dr. 500
Herman Weissker Inc. 1645 Brown Avenue 460
Home Depot Distribution Center Various locations 450
Sierra Aluminum 2345 Fleetwood Dr. 450
Source: City of Jurupa Valley, Dec. 2023

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
26 Housing Characteristics
Housing Stock Composition
The majority of Jurupa Valley’s housing stock is comprised of single -family dwelling units.

According to the ACS 20 18-2022 data, which are presented in Table 2-9, over 82 percent of the City’s housing stock is single-family units (detached and attached). This compares to 74.2 percent countywide. The remaining units in the City include 1 0.4 percent multi-family (more than two units) and 6.7 percent mobile homes.

Table 2-9
Composition of Housing Stock 2022

Source: ACS 2018-2022 (DP04)
Housing Conditions
Table 2 -10 shows that almost one-half (4 7.8%) of the existing housing stock in the City was constructed after 1980. This leaves 5 2.2 percent of the homes over 43 years old. Countywide, over two-thirds (69.2%) were constructed after 1980. In general, homes built more than 30 years ago are likely to require structural renovation and increased maintenance, resulting in greater costs for the owner. Older homes can also create health and safety problems for occupants. Older, deteriorated structures often do not meet current building code standards and lack safety features such as fire suppression, home security devices, and seismic safety retrofits. In fact, stringent seismic safety codes were not developed until after the 1971 Sylmar earthquake. After that event, many building codes were revised to ensure structures could withstand seismic activity of similar magnitude. Additionally, in 1978 the federal government prohibited the use of lead -based paint on residential property; therefore, homes built prior to 1979 have a potential risk of containing Units % of Total Units % of Total
Single Family, Detached 21,827 80.0% 585,506 68.7%
Single Family, Attached 742 2.7% 46,851 5.5%
2 Units 149 0.5% 10,919 1.3%
3 or 4 units 358 1.3% 31,267 3.7%
5 to 9 units 470 1.7% 36,131 4.2%
10 to 19 units 824 3.0% 24,007 2.8%
20 or more units 1063 3.9% 42,005 4.9%
Mobile home 1,833 6.7% 73,733 8.7%
TOTAL 27,287 100% 851,646 100%
Housing Type Jurupa Valley Riverside County
City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
27 lead-based paint. Lead poisoning can cause learning disabilities, behavioral problems and even brain damage in children.2
Table 2-10
Housing Units by Year Structure Built

Source: ACS 2018-2022 (DP04)
Future Housing Needs
Article 10.6 of the Government Code Section 65580-65590 requires all California localities to adopt a Housing Element as part of their general plan. State Housing Element Law requires that cities and counties address housing for all segments of the population including those that are lower income. The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), through the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA), allocated the regional fair share of housing needs to Jurupa Valley for the 2021-2029 period. According to the RHNA presented in Table 2-11, the City of Jurupa Valley must be able to accommodate 4,497 housing units during the 20 21-2029 period. Of this total, Jurupa Valley must be able to accommodate at least 1,207 units (26.8%) for very low-income households, 749 units (16.7%) for low-income households, 731 units (16.3%) for moderate-income households, and 1,810 units (40.2%) for above moderate -income households during the 20 21- 2029 period.

2Executive Order 12898—Environmental Justice
Units % of Total Units % of Total
Built 2020 or later 119 0.40% 5,675 0.7%
Built 2010 to 2019 2,556 9.40% 70,767 8.3%
Built 2000 to 2009 2,549 9.30% 210,692 24.7%
Built 1990 to 1999 2,435 8.90% 127,339 15.0%
Built 1980 to 1989 5,391 19.80% 174,686 20.5%
Built 1970 to 1979 5,133 18.80% 118,097 13.9%
Built 1960 to 1969 2,922 10.70% 62,426 7.3%
Built 1950 to 1959 3,705 13.60% 49,794 5.8%
Built 1940 to 1949 1,707 6.30% 14,334 1.7%
Built 1939 or earlier 770 2.80% 17,836 2.1%
Total Housing Units 27,287 100.0% 851,646 100.0%
Housing Type Jurupa Valley Riverside County
City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
28 Table 2-11
City of Jurupa Valley Regional Housing Needs Assessment 2021-2029
Household Income Housing Units Percent
Very Low (<50% MFI) 1,207 26.8%
Low (51% to 80% MFI) 749 16.7%
Moderate (81% to 120% MFI) 731 16.3%
Above Moderate (>120% MFI) 1,810 40.2%
TOTAL 4,497 100.0%
Source: SCAG RHNA 6th Cycle

Special Needs
Certain households, because of their special characteristics and needs, have more difficulty finding decent and affordable housing. The following discussion highlights particular characteristics that could affect an individual household’s access to housing in the community.

Elderly/Frail Elderly
According to 2018-2022 ACS data presented in previous Table 2-1, 11.4 percent of Jurupa Valley’s total population in 2022 were 65 years and over. Some of the characteristics of elderly residents included: limited mobility; increased medical attention due to health complication s; and, restricted fixed income, such as Social Security, pension programs and retirement income. Many elderly people also have difficulty completing normal, everyday tasks without assistance. The 2018-2022 ACS data estimate that approximately two -thirds of the Jurupa Valley’s elderly had ambulatory difficulty, which is the highest percentage of the six disability categories classified by the U.S. Census Bureau that include:
▪ Hearing difficulty: Deaf or having serious difficulty hearing. ▪ Vision difficulty: Blind or having serious difficulty seeing, even when wearing glasses. ▪ Cognitive difficulty: Because of a physical, mental, or emotional problem, having difficulty remembering, concentrating, or making decisions.
▪ Ambulatory difficulty: Having serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs. ▪ Self-care difficulty: Having difficulty bathing or dressing. ▪ Independent living difficulty: Because of a physical, mental, or emotional problem, having difficulty doing errands alone such as visiting a doctor’s office or shopping.

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
29 Large Households
Large households are defined as having five or more members. These households are usually families with two or more children or families with extended family members such as in -laws or grandparents. These can also include multiple families living in one housing unit in order to save on housing costs. Large households are a special needs group because of the lack of available affordable housing of adequately sized properties. To save for necessities such as food, clothing and medical care, lower - and moderate -income large households may reside in smaller units, resulting in overcrowding. Furthermore, families with children, especially those who are renters, may face discrimination or differential treatment in the housing m arket. For example, some landlords may charge large households a higher rent or security deposit, limit the number of children in a complex, confine them to a specific location, limit the time children can play outdoors or choose not to rent to families with children altogether, which would violate fair housing laws.

The 2018-2022 ACS data presented in Table 2-12, estimated 8,376 large households (five or more person households) in the City, which represented 32.3 percent of all households. Among the total number of owner households ( 6,145), 33.9 percent were owner households of five or more persons and among renter households (2,231), 28.5 percent were renter households with five or more persons.

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
30 Table 2-12
Jurupa Valley Owner and Renter Size of Households 2022

Source: ACS 2018-2022 (B25009)

Single-Parent Households
Single-parent families, particularly female-headed families with children, often require special consideration and assistance because of their greater need for affordable housing and accessible day care, healthcare and other supportive services. Because of their relatively lower incomes and higher living expenses, female -headed families have comparatively limited opportunities for finding affordable and decent housing. Female-headed families may also be discriminated against in the rental housing market due to concerned about their ability to make regular rent payments.

Consequently, landlords may require more stringent credit checks or higher security deposits for women, which would also be a violation of fair housing laws.

According to Table 2-13, there were 9,108 single-parent households in Jurupa Valley in 2022, and almost two-thirds (63.0%) were female-heads of household. Of all the families whose income in the past 12 month were below the poverty level, one-quarter were female head of household with no husband present, and of that portion, 24.4 percent had a related child under 18 years of age.

Number % of Total Number % of Total
1 Person 1,737 9.6% 1,481 23.2%
2 Persons 3,740 20.6% 1,637 17.8%
3 Persons 3,097 17.1% 1,076 12.9%
4 Persons 3,421 18.9% 1,392 15.9%
5 Persons 2,707 14.9% 1,055 12.8%
6 Persons 1,434 7.9% 543 10.3%
7+ Persons 2,004 11.0% 633 7.0%
Total 18,140 100.0% 7,817 100.0%
Total 1-4 persons 11,995 66.1% 5,586 71.5%
Total 5 or more
person 6,145 33.9% 2,231 28.5%
Owner Renter
City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
31 Table 2-13
Single-Parent Households and Poverty
Category Number % of Total
Total Single-Parent Households
Male Head of Households 3,372 37.0%
Female Head of Households 5,737 63.0%
Total 9,109 100.0%
Percentage Families Below Poverty Level (8.4%
all families)
Female Head of Households (no husband
present) 16.0%
Female Head of Households with Related
Child under 18 years of age 24.4%
Source: ACS 2018-2022 (DP02 and DP03)

Persons with Disabilities
Fair housing choice for persons with disabilities can be compromised based on the nature of their disability. Persons with physical disabilities may face discrimination in the housing market because of the need for wheelchairs, home modifications to improve accessibility or other forms of assistance. Landlords/owners sometimes fear that a unit might sustain wheelchair damage or might refuse to exempt disabled tenants with service/guide animals from a no-pet policy. A major barrier to housing for people with mental disabilities is opposition based on the stigma of mental illness. Landlords often refuse to rent to tenants with a histor y of mental illness , and neighbors may object when a house becomes a group home for persons with mental disabilities.

Based on the 2018-2022 ACS data presented in Table 2-14, the number of Jurupa Valley residents age 18 and older with some type of disability totaled 18,554, which was 17.7 percent of the City’s total population age five years and older. The top three disabilities among persons age five and older with disability include those with ambulatory difficulty ( 5.5%), independent living difficulty (5.3%), and cognitive difficulty (4.2%). In addition, having a disability negatively impacts a person’s ability to work and earn money.

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
32 Table 2-14
Persons with Disabilities
Disability Status
Jurupa Valley Riverside County
With
Disability % of Total With
Disability % of Total
Total Persons 5 Years and Older
105,042
with or without disabilities
2,260,858
with or without disabilities
Total Persons 5 Years and Older with Disability1
With Hearing Difficulty 2,471 2.4% 78,527 3.3%
With Vision Difficulty 1.843 1.8% 55,290 2.3%
With Cognitive Difficulty 4,109 4.2% 104,891 4.6%
With Ambulatory Difficulty 5,363 5.5% 141,477 6.3%
With Self-Care Difficulty 2,529 2.6% 62,653 2.8%
With Independent Living Difficulty2 4,080 5.3% 106,380 5.9% Source: ACS 2018-2022 (S1810)
(1) Since a single person may have multiple difficulties, sum of persons with individual difficulties is not equal to total number of persons with disability.
(2) Total person for Independent Living Difficulty is for 18 years and over. Total persons with or without disabilities = 105,042 for Jurupa Valley and 2,260,858 for Riverside County

The Fair Housing Act, as amended in 1988, requires that cities and counties provide reasonable accommodation to rules, policies, practices and procedures where such accommodation may be necessary to afford individuals with disabilities equal housing opportunities. Although fair housing laws intend that all people have equal access to housing, the law also recognizes that people with disabilities may need extra tools to achieve equality. Reasonable accommodation is one of the tools intended to further hous ing opportunities for people with disabilities. For developers and providers of housing for people with disabilities, who are often confronted with siting or use restrictions, reasonable accommodation provides a means of requesting from the local government flexibility in the application of land -use, zoning and building code regulations or, in some instances, even a waiver of certain restrictions or requirements because it is necessary to achieve equal access to housing. Cities and counties are required t o consider requests for accommodations related to housing for people with disabilities and to provide the accommodation when it is determined to be “reasonable” based on fair housing laws and the case law interpreting the statutes.

Persons with HIV/AIDS
Persons with HIV/AIDS face an array of barriers to obtaining and maintaining affordable, stable housing. For persons living with HIV/AIDS, access to safe, affordable housing could be as important to their general health and wellbeing as access to quality h ealthcare. For many, the City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
33 persistent shortage of stable housing can be the primary barrier to consistent medical care and treatment.3 In addition, persons with HIV/AIDS may be targets of hate crimes. Despite federal and state anti-discrimination laws, many people face illegal eviction from their homes when their illness is exposed. The Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988, which is primarily enforced by HUD, prohibits housing discrimination against persons with disabilities, including persons with HIV/AIDS.

The California Department of Public Health’s California HIV Surveillance Report for 2021 estimates that there were approximately 10,541 people living with a diagnosed HIV infection in Riverside County. This represents 30.1 percent of HIV -diagnosed residents statewide in 2016 , five years previously – when the last AI was completed. Persons with HIV/AIDS face an array of barriers to obtaining and maintaining affordable, stable housing. For persons living with HIV/AIDS, the persistent shortage of stable housing can be the primary barrier to consistent medical care and treatment. In addition, persons with HIV/AIDS may be targets of hate crim es and discrimination, including illegal eviction from their homes when their illness is exposed. The Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988 prohibits housing discrimination against persons with disabilities, including persons with HIV/AIDS. In addition, persons with HIV/AID are not generally able to hold jobs involving frequent interaction with the public due to their immune system deficiencies.

Therefore, their job inventory is much less diverse than that for the typical citizen. Job placement could be imp erative for this group to maintain sufficient income to afford their medication and live in decent and affordable housing.

The City of Riverside is the Grantee of the HOPWA formula funding for both Riverside and San Bernardino County. The Housing Authority of the County of Riverside (HACR) , as the Project Sponsor, administers the HOPWA grant throughout Riverside County. The HOPWA program prevents homelessness for individuals and/or families that have AIDS/HIV by providing long term rental assistance through the Housing Options Program and Short Term Rental, Mortgage and Utility Assistance. The Housing Options Program provides 90 units of permanent affordable housing via tenant based rental assistance to households at or below 80 percent of AMI.

Homeless Persons
Over the last several decades, the increasing homeless population has become issues of local, regional, and national significance. Lack of affordable housing can exacerbate homelessness, and hinders a community’s ability to effectively address this challenge. A homeless family or individual as defined by federal regulations is a person or family that lacks a fixed and regular nighttime residence. The homeless population can be divided into two major groups, the sheltered and the unsheltered homeless . Sheltered homeless are those individuals or families whose primary residence is an emergency shelter, transitional housing, a domestic violence shelter, a shelter for runaway children, or people living in a motel/hotel under a voucher arrangement. Unsh eltered homeless are individual or families with a primary nighttime residence that is a public or private

3National AIDS Housing Coalition, AIDS and Behavior (Vol. 11, Suppl. 2, November 2007) City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
34 place not designed for or ordinarily used as a regular sleeping accommodation for human beings, including a car, park, abandoned building, bus or train station, airport, or camping ground.

In 2023, Riverside County conducted a count of the number of homeless in the county in a given 24-hour period, which is known as the Homeless Point-in-Time (PIT) Count survey. The PIT Count is a one night snapshot o f homelessness. The Department of Public Social Services (DPSS), in partnership with the County of Riverside Continuum of Care (a network of private - and public- sector homeless service providers) and cities, coordinated the PIT Count held on the morning o f January 2 5, 20 23. Multiple county departments participated, including the Department of Behavioral Health, Code Enforcement, Housing Authority, Probation and the Sheriff’s Office.

In the 20 23 PIT Count, 3,725 sheltered and unsheltered homeless individua ls were counted countywide, an increase of 32.5 percent over the 2019 count. The 2023 count also shows that 79 unsheltered homeless individuals were counted in the City of Jurupa Valley, a decline of 60 homeless persons from 2018.
▪ Key findings from the 2023 PIT Count for Jurupa Valley include:
▪ 82 percent of homeless persons were White
▪ 10 percent were multiple races
▪ 6 percent were Black
▪ 46 percent were Hispanic
▪ 67 percent of homeless persons were male
▪ 96 percent were adults age 24 and over, 4 percent youths 18-24 years ▪ 4 percent were veterans
▪ 62 percent were chronically homeless (a significant increase of the co mparable figure of 37 percent five years ago
▪ 19 percent had a mental health condition
▪ 38 percent had substance abuse
▪ 36 percent had physical disability and 14 percent had developmental disability. ▪ No children or families with children were interviewed

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
35 Overcrowding and Overpaying for Housing
Overcrowding. As defined by the state and HUD, overcrowding occurs when there is more than one person per room (excluding kitchens, bathrooms and hallways), and occupancy by more than

1.5 persons per room is considered severe overcrowding. As shown in Table 2-15, overcrowding occurred in 11.7 percent of the City’s total occupied units and severe overcrowding in 4.1 percent of the total occupied units in 2022. It also shows that overcrowding occurs in 14.8 percent of the total rental stock as compared to 10.4 percent of the owner-occupied housing stock. Renters have just over double the severe overcrowding rate (6.6 percent(, compared to owners (3.1 percent).

This indicates the need for larger rental units and/or more rental subsidies to allow large households to afford adequately sized units. Conditions of overcrowding are largely a combination of the lack of large rental units and the inability of most large renter households to afford larger units, which tend to be more commonly available as ownership housing.

Table 2-15
Overcrowding and Overpaying in Jurupa Valley

Owner Renter Total
Occupied
Units Percent
Occupied
Units Percent
Occupied
Units Percent
Overcrowding (Occupants
per Room)

1.00 or Less 15,696 86.5% 6,146 78.6% 21,842 84.1%

1.01 to 1.50 1,889 10.4% 1,158 14.8% 3,047 11.7%

1.51 or more 555 3.1% 513 6.6% 1,068 4.1%
Total Household 18,140 100.0% 7,817 100.0% 25,957 100.0% Overpaying
Less Than 30% 12,941 71.3% 3,205 41.0% 16,146 62.2%
30% or More 5,072 28.0% 4,290 54.9% 9,362 36.1%
Not Computed 127 0.7% 322 4.1% 449 1.7%
Total Households 18,013 100.0% 7,817 100.0% 25,957 100.0% Source: ACS 2018-2022 (DP04) and (B25014)

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
36 Overpaying. The most prevalent housing problem facing Jurupa Valley households was overpayment on housing cost. A household is considered to be overpaying for housing if housing costs (rent plus utilities) make up more than 30 percent of the household’s gross monthly income.

A major consequence of overpayment is that less income is available to satisfy other needs, the largest of which tends to be transportation costs, as well as medical expenses.

Table 2-15 also shows that of the 25,957 total occupied units or households in the City, overpaying occurred with 9,362 occupied units ( 36.1%). Renter households tended to overpay more for housing than owners. Overpaying accounts for over one-half (54.9%) of the total rental stock, as compared to less than one-third (28.0%) of owner-occupied housing.

Fair Market Rent
Fair Market Rent (FMR) is the amount of money a property would rent or lease for if it was available at this time, and is used by HUD to determine how much rent should be covered through the Section 8 Voucher program for individuals with low income. Table 2-16 presents the FMR for the Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario MSA, which Jurupa Valley is located in. It shows that the FY 2023 FMR for an efficiency/studio is $ 1,281 up to four-bedroom unit at $2,922. In the last year (2022 to 20 23), the FMR increases have been significant – increasing by 20.6 percent for Efficiency/Studio units, 16.3 percent for 1 Bedroom Unit, 16.0 perc ent for 2-Bedroom unit, 15.1 for 3-Bedroom units and 14.9 percent for 4-bedroom units.

Table 2-16
HUD Fair Market Rent
Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario MSA
Year
Number of Bedrooms
Efficiency/
Studio 1 2 3 4
FY 2022 FMR $1,062 $1,202 $1,509 $2,065 $2,542
FY 2023 FMR $1,281 $1,398 $1,751 $2,376 $2,922
Source: HUD FY 2022 and 2023 Fair Market Rent
Table 2-17 presents the 20 23 HUD Section 8 income limits by family size for the Riverside -San Bernardino-Ontario MSA. HUD sets income limits that determine eligibility for assisted housing programs including public housing , Section 8 project -based, Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher, Section 202 housing for the elderly, and Section 811 housing for persons with disabilities programs. HUD develops income limits based on Median Family Income (MFI) estimates and Fair Market Rent area definitions for each metropolitan area, parts of some me tropolitan areas, and each non-metropolitan county.

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
37 Table 2-17
FY 2023 Section 8 Income Limits
Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario MSA
Limit Category
Median Family Income $94,500
Number of Persons
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Extremely Low (<30%) $19,600 $22,400 $25,200 $27,950 $30,200 $32,450 $34,700 $36,900 Very Low (31% to 50%) $32,650 $37,300 $41,950 $46,600 $50,350 $54,100 $57,800 $61,550 Low (51% to 80%) $52,200 $59,650 $67,100 $74,550 $80,550 $86,500 $92,450 $98,450 Source: HUD Section 8 Income Limits FY 2023

A family’s gross annual income is compared to the applicable income limits to determine eligibility for housing assistance and must be within the income limits for the Public Housing Authority’s jurisdiction. To be eligible for public housing assistance, the family’s gross annual income may not exceed the current low-income limits by number of persons.

Public Transit System
Public transit information is important to the AI, as access to public transit is of paramount importance to households affected by low incomes and rising housing prices. Public transit should link lower -income persons, who are often transit dependent, to major employers where job opportunities exist. Access to employment v ia public transportation can reduce welfare usage rates and increase housing mobility, which enables residents to locate housing outside of traditionally low- and moderate-income neighborhoods. The lack of a relationship between public transit, employment opportunities and affordable housing may impede fair housing choice because persons who depend on public transit will have limited choices regarding places to live.

In addition, elderly and disabled persons often rely on public transit to visit doctors, go shopping or attend activities at community facilities. Public transit that provides a link between job opportunities, public services and affordable housing helps to ensure that transit -dependent residents have adequate opportunity to access housing, services and jobs.

Jurupa Valley is served by fixed -route services and a demand -response service for local area residents. The Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) provides both fixed-route and demand -response services and Metrolink offers regional rail service with a station in Jurupa Valley. .

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
38 Riverside Transit Agency
The Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) was established as a Joint Powers Agency in 1975 and began operating bus service in 1977. RTA is the Consolidated Transportation Service Agency for western Riverside County and is responsible for coordinating transit services throughout the approximate 2,500 square mile service area. RTA provides both local and regional services throughout the region with 39 fixed routes, eight Commuter Link express routes, and Dial -A-Ride services using 334 vehicles.

RTA is governed by a board of directors comprised of 22 elected officials from 18 cities in western Riverside County and four members of the County Board of Supervisors. The City of Jurupa Valley is one of the member jurisdictions.

Bus Service. There are four bus lines that serve Jurupa Valley, which are illustrated on Figure 2-6.

These bus lines provide service to the Montclair Transit Center, Jurupa Valley Pedley Metrolink Station, Riverside-Downtown Metrolink Station, and Downtown Riverside. ▪ Route 21 - Galleria at Tyler, Country Village via Jurupa Valley ▪ Route 29 - Riverside-Downtown Metrolink Station, Downtown Riverside, Jurupa Valley, Eastvale
▪ Route 49 - Riverside-Downtown Metrolink Station, Downtown Riverside, Country Village, Fontana
▪ Route 204 - UCR, Downtown Riverside, Country Village, Ontario Mills, Montclair Transcenter
RTA fixed-route buses are accessible to persons with disabilities and all buses are equipped with wheelchair ramps or wheelchair lifts. Audible bus stop announcements are made on all buses.

Dial-A-Ride. The RTA Dial-A-Ride is an origin-to-destination advanced reservation transportation service for seniors and persons with disabilities. Dial-A-Ride vehicles travel to areas within three- quarters of a mile of an RTA local fixed route. These areas are called the "Dial-A-Ride service area" and trips must begin and end in that service area. Dial -A-Ride service is provided at times equivalent to local fixed-route bus service in that area.

ADA Priority Dial-A-Ride service is available to those individuals who are unable to use fixed-route bus service due to their disability. Persons who are ADA-certified are eligible for trips throughout the RTA service area that are within three -quarters of a mile of local fixed -route bus service and during the hours of bus service operation. Individuals who are ADA certified are eligible to bring a Personal Care Attendant (PCA) at no cost if their ADA card permits. A companion or child may come along and will be required to pay a fare.

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
39 Source: https://www.riversidetransit.com/index.php/maps-schedules Figure 2-6
Riverside Transit Agency Bus Lines

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
40 Seniors age 65 and above and persons with disabilities are eligible for local Dial-A-Ride service within a single city and within three -quarters of a mile of local fixed -route bus service during the hours of bus service operation. Transportation is provided only within the city in which trip begins.

The Dial-A-Ride Plus Lifeline Service provides access to lifeline services for those who are outside the three-quarter mile boundary and have no other transportation options. Trips are restricted to life - sustaining services and provide an additional two-mile radius of the fixed-route boundary. Passenger fares will be identical to those charged for traditional Dial-A-Ride service.

Eligible participants must be 65 or older or must have a disability that creates a need for specialized transportation. Service will be provided using wheelchair accessible taxis, currently being utilized under the Agency’s taxi overflow services contract. These trips will be coordinated using the existing Dial-A-Ride trip process.

Since the la st AI was completed approximately five years ago – fares have not increased. The base fare for Dial -A-Ride service is $3.50 per passenger, per boarding. The maximum fare is $10.50 per one-way trip and will be based on the number of city zones traveled. Depending on where trip begins and ends, riders may be required to transfer. Exact fare for the entire trip is required and must be paid upon boarding the first bus.

Only ADA-certified passengers may bring a PCA. If eligible, an attendant may accompany rider at no charge and an additional companion may ride for $3.50 per fare zone if space is available. If rider plans to bring a child as a companion, and the child is less than 46 inches tall, they may ride for 75 cents per fare zone.

The Buddy Fare is a way to save money on Dial -A-Ride. With this special program, two to 10 eligible customers can share the fare for each fare zone. The entire group must be picked up within a half - mile radius of each other and travel to the same destination. Basic RTA fares are presented in Table 2-18.

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
41 Table 2-18
RTA Fares
Fare Categories Base Fare Day Pass 7-Day Pass 30-Day Pass Local and Rapid Link Fixed-
Rail
General $1.75 $5 $20 $60
Youth (Age 18 and
under) $1.75 N/A N/A $45
Senior/Disabled $0.75 $2.50 $20 $30
Medicare Care Holder $0.75 $2.50 $20 $30
Veteran $0.75 $2.50 $20 $30
Child (46" tall or under) $0.50 N/A N/A N/A
CommuterLink
General $3.50 $10 $95
Youth (Age 18 and
under) $3.50 N/A N/A
Senior/Disabled $2.75 $7 $70
Medicare Care Holder $2.75 $7 $70
Veteran $2.75 $7 $70
Child (46" tall or under) $2.75 N/A N/A
Dial-A-Ride Ticket
Book
Senior/Disabled $3.50 $35
Medicare Care Holder $3.50 $35
Child (46" tall or under) $0.75 N/A
Source: Riverside Transit Agency - https://www.riversidetransit.com/index.php/fares-a-passes/fares-a-passes, 2024 Metrolink Service. Metrolink is a commuter rail system of seven lines that serve the counties of Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, Ventura, and northern San Diego. The regional Metrolink system is illustrated in Figure 2-7. It is a network of lines and stations that connect Southern California residents to major destinations and employment centers. In Riverside County t here are three Metrolink lines (Riverside, Inland Empire -Orange County, and 91 Perris Valley lines), with the Riverside line traversing the City of Jurupa Valley and stopping at the Jurupa Valley/Pedley station.

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
42 Source:https://metrolinktrains.com/globalassets/maps/map_freeconnections_20231025 _edit.pdf, 2024

Figure 2-7
Metrolink Commuter Rail System

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
43 Metrolink fares are based on trip length and it offers many different types of tickets. Discounts are available to seniors, persons with disabilities, Medicare recipients, students/youths, children (ages 5 and under, and active military. Discounts include:
▪ Senior/Disabled/Medicare
- 25% off Monthly Pass and 7-Day Pass
- 50% off One-Way and Round-Trip tickets
- Seniors qualify for discount if age is 65 or over.
- Disabled or Medicare discount applies with: LA County Transit Operators Association ID card; Reduced fare ID card from other transit system; Medicare ID card; DMV placard ID card; or LA County Access Services ID Card holders ride at no cost within Los Angeles County only.
- A Personal Care Attendant (PCA) is allowed to accompany a person with a disability without purchasing a ticket. The PCA must board and detrain with the person with a disability.
▪ Student/Youth
- 25% off Monthly Pass, 7-Day Pass, One-Way and Round-Trip tickets - Youths: Ages 6 to 18
- Students: Please present valid Student ID to the fare inspector upon request. ▪ Child (Ages 5 and under)
- Three children ride free with an adult using a valid ticket - each additional child pays youth fare.
▪ Active Military
- 10% off One-Way and Round-Trip tickets
- Present a valid Common Access Card (CAC)
Table 2-19, is an example of the Metrolink fares from the Jurupa Valley/Pedley station to the next station east on the Riverside line (Riverside-Downtown station).

Table 2-19
Metrolink Fares
Jurupa Valley/Pedley Station to Riverside-Downtown Station Fares 1-Way Round-Trip 7-Day Pass Monthly Pass
Regular $4.25 $8.50 $29.75 $119.00
Senior/Disabled/Medicare $2.00 $4.00 $22.25 $89.25
Student/Youth (Student
Adventure Pass) Free Free Free Free
Active Military $3.75 $7.50 -- --
Source: Metrolink - https://www.metrolinktrains.com/ticketsOverview/ticket-info/price-finder/, 2024 City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
44 Public Assisted Housing
The availabilit y and location of public -assisted housing may be a fair housing concern. If such housing is concentrated in one area of a community, a household seeking affordable housing is limited to choices within that particular area. Public assisted housing and housing assistance must be accessible to qualified households regardless of race/ethnicity, disability or other special characteristics.

Housing Authority of the County of Riverside
The City of Jurupa Valley does not have a housing authority. The Housing Authority of the County of Riverside (HACR) oversees public housing programs for Jurupa Valley and other participating jurisdictions. HACR is a public agency chartered by the State of California to administer public housing programs for Jurupa Val ley and other participating jurisdictions within the county. In order to quality for these programs, residents must have an annual gross income at or below 80 percent of the Area Median Income (AMI), or be seniors or persons with disabilities.

Section 8 H ousing Voucher Program . The Section 8 Housing Voucher program provides rental subsidies to low -income families that spend more than 30 percent of their gross income on housing costs. The program pays the difference between 30 percent of the recipients’ m onthly income and the federally approved payment standard. Recipients of Section 8 vouchers are able to find their own housing, including single -family homes, townhouses and apartments.

Participants are free to choose any housing that meets the requireme nts of the program and are not limited to units located in subsidized housing projects.

Another variable to consider is the number of households requesting rental assistance. Recent information from the County of Riverside Economic Development Agency (EDA) estimates that 416 Jurupa Valley households currently receive rental assistance. There are 310 households that are seniors, 200 that are disabled, 1 9 veterans, and no homeless currently receiving assistance.

This information may be duplicated where some seniors are also disabled and some disabled are also seniors. Based on consultation with HARC staff, as of February 20 23, 2,551 Jurupa Valley households were on the waitlist for federal rental assistance. Of these households, 361 are senior households, 571 are disabled households, and 724 are self-identified as “homeless” Jurupa Valley households.

Race/ethnicity of voucher holders is not reported exclusively; voucher holders can identify with more than one race/ethnicity. According to data from PIH Information Center that is in the Jurupa Valley’s recent ConPlan, 62.5 percent of voucher holders identify as White. One -third of the voucher holder identify as Black/African American, 2.4 percent identify as Asian, and about one - quarter (26.5%) of voucher holders identify as being of Hispanic origin.

Public Housing. The City’s ConPlan indicates that there were 456 households in public housing in Jurupa Valley, and that 331 households or 72.6 percent were homeless at admission, and 15.4 percent had a member with a disability. One hundred percent of households reques ted accessibility features. In addition, householders who were elderly (>62 years) accounted for 8.3 City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
45 percent of the total households in public housing. No households reported participating in the HIV/AIDS program or a domestic violence victim.

Race/ethnicity of public housing residents is not reported exclusively; residents can identify with more than one race/ethnicity. Whites formed the largest racial group among public housing residents, with 318 residents or 69.7 percent of participants. Over one -quarter (27.6%) of participants identify as Black/African American, two percent as Asian, less than one percent as American Indian/Alaska Native and Pacific Islander, and 55.2 percent of all participants identify as Hispanic.

Affordable Housing Projects
Apartment projects can receive housing assistance from a variety of sources to ensure that rent is affordable for lower-income households. In exchange for public assistance, owners are typically required to reserve a portion or all of the units as affordable housing for lower -income households. The length-of-use restrictions are dependent on the funding program. The types of public assistance commonly used by owners when partnering with local jurisdictions are the HOME and CDBG programs. These funds are typ ically used in concert with Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC) to reduce the debt associated with the project, the reby maximizing affordability.

The LIHTC program creates an incentive for private investment in low -income housing development by giving federal tax credits to investors. Private investors, such as banks and corporations, buy the tax credits from an affordable housing developer. The owner/developer uses the proceeds from the sale of these tax credits, known as “equity,” to construct or rehabilitate housing. Investors receive a federal tax credit over a 10-year term. Information from the California Tax Credit Allocation Committee4 website identifies one LIHTC rental housing development in the City of Jurupa Valley. It is identified as Vista Rio Apartments, located at 3901 Brigs Street, Jurupa Valley, 92509. This is a nine percent tax credit funded project for large families-type new housing.

It includes a total of 39 units, of which 38 are low-income units.

Community Care Facilities
Individuals with special needs, including the elderly or persons with physical or mental disabilities, need access to suitable housing in their community. This segment of the population often needs affordable housing that is located near public transportation, social and health services, and shopping. Persons with disabilities may require units equipped with wheelchair accessibility or other special features that accommodate physical or sensory limitations.

Depending on the severity of the dis ability and support program regulations and reimbursement levels, people may live independently with some assistance in their own homes, in assisted living, or other special care facilities.

Table 2-20 shows the number of licensed community care facilities in the City of Jurupa Valley and the total Riverside County. In total, there are over 544 licensed community care facilities, serving

4 https://www.treasurer.ca.gov/ctcac/projects.asp
City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
46 adults, elderly and persons with disabilities (including children) that are located in the Riverside County. According to the Riverside County AI 2019-2024, there are 76 licensed home care agencies that provide services throughout the County. In Jurupa Valley there are 14 Adult Residential Facilities and nine Assisted Living Residential Care Facility for the Elderly. Addre sses are not available for Children’s Residential Group Homes in Jurupa Valley.

Table 2-20
Licensed Residential Care Facilities
Facilities Jurupa Valley Riverside County
Adult Residential Facility 14 232
Asst. Living Resid. Care Fac. for the Elderly 9 227
Adult Day Care 0 37
Children’s Residential Group Homes NA 27
Small Family Homes 0 21
Source: California Department of Social Services, Community Care Licensing Division https://secure.dss.ca.gov/CareFacilitySearch/home/selecttype/

The licensed care facilities for the special needs residents are defined as follows by the California Department of Social Services, Community Care Licensing Division:
▪ Adult Residential Facilities (ARF) provide 24 -hour non -medical care for adults ages 18 years through 59 years old who are unable to provide for their own daily need s. ARFs include board and care homes for adults with developmental disabilities and mental illnesses.
▪ Residential Care Facilities for the Elderly (RCFE) provide care, supervision, and assistance with daily living activities, such as bathing and grooming. I n California, “elderly” is considered age 60 and above.
▪ Adult Day Care facilities provide care to persons 18 years of age or older in need of personal services, supervision, or assistance essential for sustaining the activities of daily living or for the protection of these individuals on less than a 24-hour basis. ▪ Children's Residential Group Homes provide 24-hour non-medical care and supervision to children. Services include social, psychological, and behavioral programs for troubled youth.
▪ Small Family Homes (SFH) provides 24-hour care in the licensee’s family residence for six or fewer children who require special supervision as a result of a mental or developmental disability or physical handicap.

In addition to the residential care facilities described above, there are a wide variety of programs to assist special needs populations and individuals and families who are homeless or at risk of homelessness. Many programs also target specific groups su ch as youth, veterans, or persons with HIV/AIDS.

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
47 3. Mortgage Lending Practices
An essential aspect of fair housing choice is equal access to credit for the purchase or improvement of a home. In the past, fair lending practices were not always employed by financial institutions.

Credit market distortions and other activities such as redlining – a practice whereby a lender provides unequal access to credit or unequal credit terms to a person because of their race, creed, color or national origin or other characteristic(s) of the residents of the area where the applicant resides or will reside - prevented some groups from equal access to credit.

Discriminatory practices in home mortgage lending have evolved in the past five to six decades. In the 1940s and 1950s, racial discrimination in mortgage lending was easy to spot. From government-sponsored racial covenants , to the redlining practices of private mortgage lenders and financial institutions, ethnic minorities were denied access to home mortgages in ways that severely limited their ability to purchase a home. In recent years, discriminatory lending practices have become more subtle. By employing high pressure sales practices and deceptive tactics, some mortgage brokers pushed minority borrowers into high -cost subprime mortgages that were not well suited to their needs and led to financial problems.

In the past, fair lending practices were not always employed by financial institutions. Credit market distortions and other activities such as redlining prevented some groups from equal access to credit. Some of the key mortgage lending laws are summarized below.

Lending Laws and Regulations
Community Reinvestment Act
The passage of the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) in 1977 was designed to improve access to credit for all members of the community. The CRA is intended to encourage regulated financial institutions to help meet the credit needs of entire communities, including low - and moderate- income neighborhoods. The CRA requires that each insured depository institution’s record in helping meet the credit needs of its entire community be e valuated periodically. That record is taken into account in considering an institution’s application for deposit facilities, including mergers and acquisitions. Depending on the type of institution and total assets, a lender may be examined by different supervising agencies for its CRA performance, such as the Federal Reserve Board (FRB), Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC), Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), and Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS).

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
48 Fair Housing Act and Amendment
Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (Fair Housing Act), as amended on September 13, 1988 and became effective on March 12 1989 (The Fair Housing Amendments Act), prohibits discrimination in the sale, rental, and financing of residential dwellings, and in other residential real estate related transactions, based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, familial status (defined as families with children under the age of 18 living with parents or l egal custodians, pregnant women, or people in the process of securing the custody of children under the age of 18), and disability. The Act makes it unlawful to engage in the following practices based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, familial status or handicap (disability):
▪ Refuse to make a mortgage loan
▪ Refuse to provide information regarding loans
▪ Impose different terms or conditions on a loan, such as different interest rates, points, or fees
▪ Discriminate in appraising property
▪ Refuse to purchase a loan or set different terms or conditions for purchasing a loan Equal Credit Opportunity Act
Regarding any type of credit transaction - under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, a creditor may not discriminate against an applicant based on the applicant's race, color, or national origin.

Home Mortgage Disclosure Act
In tandem with the CRA, the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) requires lending institutions to make annual public disclosures of their home mortgage lending activity. Under HMDA, lenders are required to disclose information on the disposition of home loan applications and on the race or national origin, gender, and annual income of loan applicants.

Detailed HMDA data for conventional and government -backed home purchase and home improvement loans in Jurupa Valley were examined. HMDA data provides some insi ght into the lending patterns that exist in a community. However, the HMDA data is used only to indicate the potential for unfair lending practices; the data cannot be used to reach definite conclusions on discriminatory practices.

Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act
The Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act of 2009, or FERA, was enacted May 20, 2009. This federal law enhanced criminal enforcement of federal fraud laws, especially regarding financial institutions, mortgage fraud, and securities fraud or commodi ties fraud. FERA amends the definition of a financial institution to include private mortgage brokers and non-bank lenders that are not directly regulated or insured by the federal government, making them liable under federal bank fraud criminal statutes. The new law also makes it illegal to make a materially false statement or to willfully overvalue a property in order to manipulate the mortgage lending business. In City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
49 addition, FERA includes provisions to protect funds expended under TARP and the Recovery Ac t and amends the Federal securities statutes to cover fraud schemes involving commodity futures and options. Additional funds were also made available under FERA to a number of enforcement agencies in order to investigate and prosecute fraud.

Detailed FFIEC data , aggregated by CLC Compliance Technologies, Inc. for conventional and government-backed home purchase and home improvement loans for the City of Jurupa Valley are presented in Tables 3-1 to 3-8. The FFIEC data provide some insights regarding the lending patterns that exist in a community. However, the data are only an indicator of potential problems; the data lack the financial details of the loan terms to make a definite conclusion that redlining or discrimination exists.

Overall Lending Patterns
Data and Methodology
The availability of financing affects a person’s ability to purchase or improve a home. Under the HMDA, lending institutions are required to disclose information on the disposition of loan applications by the income, gender, and race of the applicants. This applies to all loan applications for home purchases, improvements, and refinancing, whether financed at market rate or with government assistance.

HMDA data are submitted by lend ing institutions to the FFIEC. Certain data is available to the public via the FFIEC site either in raw data format or as pre -set printed reports. The analyses of HMDA data presented in this AI were conducted using data from Compliance Tech and FFIEC.

Compliance Tech’s Lending Patterns database tool that analyzes lending records to produce reports on various aspects of mortgage le nding was used in this report. HMDA data included in this report includes market share, approval rates, denial rates, low/moderate income lending, and high-cost lending, among other key lending aspects in the City of Jurupa Valley.

General Overview
A summary of all home purchase loan activities that went through the complete loan process (loans approved, denied and approved then rejected by applicants) from 201 8 to 2022 - can be found in Tables 3-1 to 3-8. The types of loans reviewed included home purchase, refinancing and home improvement loans. Furthermore, the loan information is provided by outcomes of race, ethnicity, income and gender.

In 2022 the home purchase denial rate for the City of Jurupa Valley was less approximately 20.5 percent – 304 home purch ase loans were denied out of 1,484 loans that went through the complete mortgage lending process. The trend for denial rates had been declining, in general, over the beginning of the past five-year period. Then, during the beginning of the coronavirus denials went up to 15.1% in 2020, and last year, most likely because of higher interest rates, denial rate City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
50 was at 20.5% . Five years ago, 15.5 percent of purchase loans were denied in Jurupa Valley, and the denial rate declined for a few years, until, it went back up recently.

Home Purchase, Refinance and Home Improvement Loans - Conventional and Governmental-Backed Financing
Conventional financing involves market-rate loans provided by private lending institutions such as banks, mortgage companies, savings and loans, and thrift institutions. To assist low - and moderate-income households that might have difficulty in obtaining home mortgage financing in the private market due to income and equity issues, several government agencies offer loan products that have below market rate interest and are insured (“b acked”) by government agencies. Sources of government-backed financing include loans i nsured by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA), the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and the Rural Housing Services/Farm Service Agency (RHA/FSA). Often, government -backed loans are offered to consumers through private lending institutions. Local programs such as first-time homebuyer and rehabilitation programs are not subject to HMDA reporting requirements.

According to the FFIEC data presented in Table 3-1, a total of 1,484 households applied for a total of approximately $682.2 million of conventional home purchase loans in the City of Jurupa Valley during 20 22. Of those that applied for a conventional loan, 1, 112 loans were approved and accepted by the applicant for a total of $ 559.3 million. The approval rate for all applicants was

79.5 percent, whereas the denial rate was 20.5 percent. Approximately, 4.6 percent of loans that were approved by the lending institutions were rejected by applicants.

Government-backed loans (FHA, FSA/RHS and VA loans) provide approximately 21 percent of total mortgage lending in Jurupa Valley (20 22). During 2022, government-backed loans received 242 applications totaling approximately $ 133.1 million. The approval rate fo r government -backed loans was 88.1 percent and the denial rate was 11.9 percent. The total amount of government - backed loans approved and accepted by the applicant totaled $114.1 million in 20122. In addition to the detail data provided for 2022 – five-year trend data was also provided for home purchase, refinancing and home improvement loans. Adding conventional and government -backed loans results in a 79.5 percent approval rate for home purchase loans and a denial rate of 20.5 percent.

Specifically, the data includes:
▪ Table 3-2 includes data on home purchase denials by race for the five -year period (2018- 2022). During the past five years, on average, 1,841 purchase loans went through the complete process each year. This is an increase over the previous annual loan figure of 1,624. It should be noted that there was a significant drop off of loans in 2022 – most likely due to the increase in interest rates.
▪ Table 3-3 includes data on refinance home lo an denials by race for the five -year period (2018-2022). About four thousand refinance loans went through the complete process each year. The refinance loan number peaked in 2020 at 6,715 loans, and last year was the lowest number of refinance loans at 1,664 during the five-year period – most likely due to high interest rates. While denial rate for purchase loans are 20.5 percent, for refinance applications in 2022, the denial rate was 22.9 percent.

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
51 ▪ Table 3-4 includes home improvement loan denials by race for the five-year period (2018- 2022). On average, a much smaller number - 416 home improvement loans went through the complete process each year, compared with purchase and refinance loans.

Improvement loans also had denial rates significantly higher than purchase and refinance loans, with the denial rate being 41.9 percent in 2022.

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
52 Table 3-1
Home Purchase Loans by Race, Ethnicity and Income
City of Jurupa Valley (2022)

Sources: CLC Compliance Technologies, Inc., Lending Patterns, Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council, Dec. 2023

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
53 Table 3-2
Home Purchase Loans - Denials by Race and Ethnicity in the City of Jurupa Valley (2018-2022)

Sources: CLC Compliance Technologies, Inc., Lending Patterns, Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council, Dec. 2023

Loan Category Tot % Den. % Tot % Den. % Tot % Den. % Tot % Den. % Tot % Den. % Loan Purpose and Type
Purchase - Conventional 1,591 78.5 236 81.7 1,386 75.7 202 80.8 1,514 78.4 258 88.4 1,632 84.4 247 89.8 1,232 83.0 274 90.1 Purchase - Government 436 21.5 53 18.3 444 24.3 48 19.2 416 21.6 34 11.6 301 15.6 28 10.2 252 17.0 30 9.9 Total 2,027 100 289 100 1,830 100 250 100 1,930 100 292 100 1,933 100 275 100 1,484 100 304 100 Applicant Race
American Indian/Alaska Native 13 0.6 2 0.7 14 0.8 3 1.2 18 0.9 4 1.4 18 0.9 3 1.1 10 1.0 3 1.0 Asian 466 23.0 59 20.4 348 19.0 34 13.6 327 16.9 41 14.0 397 20.5 50 18.2 270 13.2 40 13.2 Black or African American 90 4.4 23 8.0 70 3.8 6 2.4 83 4.3 16 5.5 92 4.8 26 9.5 59 5.3 16 5.3 Hawaiian / Pacific Islander 7 0.3 1 0.3 4 0.2 0 - 7 0.4 1 0.3 10 0.5 3 1.1 5 0.7 2 0.7 White 1,102 54.4 148 51.2 1,073 58.6 149 59.6 1,023 53.0 146 50.0 953 49.3 121 44.0 706 45.4 138 45.4 2 or More Minority Races 4 0.2 0 - 2 0.1 2 0.8 1 0.1 0 - 6 0.3 1 0.4 4 0.3 1 0.3 Joint Race (White/Minority) 47 2.3 5 1.7 38 2.1 3 1.2 42 2.2 6 2.1 21 1.1 3 1.1 29 0.3 1 0.3 Race Not Available 298 14.7 51 17.6 281 15.4 53 21.2 429 22.2 78 26.7 436 22.6 68 24.7 403 34.2 104 34.2 Total 2,027 100 289 100 1,830 100 250 100 1,930 100 292 100 1,933 100 275 100 1,486 100 305 100 Applicant Ethnicity
Hispanic or Latino 795 39.2 129 44.6 825 45.1 133 53.2 852 44.1 161 55.1 884 45.7 138 50.2 680 51.2 157 51.6 Not Hispanic or Latino 896 44.2 122 42.2 725 39.6 92 36.8 705 36.5 89 30.5 667 34.5 87 31.6 491 39.6 91 29.9 Joint (Hisp/Lat / Not Hisp/Lat) 84 4.1 7 2.4 65 3.6 5 2.0 63 3.3 5 1.7 52 2.7 4 1.5 54 3.3 7 2.3 Ethnicity Not Available 252 12.4 31 10.7 215 11.7 20 8.0 310 16.1 37 12.7 330 17.1 46 16.7 259 5.9 49 16.1 Total 2,027 100 289 100 1,830 100 250 100 1,930 100 292 100 1,933 100 275 100 1,484 100 304 100 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
54 Table 3-3
Refinance Loans - Denials by Race and Ethnicity in the City of Jurupa Valley (2018-2022)

Sources: CLC Compliance Technologies, Inc., Lending Patterns, Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council, Dec. 2023

Loan Category Tot % Den. % Tot % Den. % Tot % Den. % Tot % Den. % Tot % Den. % Loan Purpose and Type
Refinance 1,924 100.0 677 100.0 3,124 100.0 185 100.0 6,715 100.0 280 100.0 6,490 100.0 964 100.0 1,664 100.0 440 100.0 Total 1,924 100 677 100 3,124 100 185 100 6,715 100 280 100 6,490 100 964 100 1,664 100 440 100 Applicant Race
American Indian/Alaska Native 17 0.9 8 1.2 22 0.7 1 0.5 59 0.9 2 0.7 53 0.8 10 1.0 11 0.7 5 1.1 Asian 160 8.3 57 8.4 303 9.7 8 4.3 913 13.6 5 1.8 819 12.6 133 13.8 138 8.3 33 7.5 Black or African American 76 4.0 35 5.2 140 4.5 3 1.6 254 3.8 8 2.9 288 4.4 57 5.9 88 5.3 31 7.0 Hawaiian / Pacific Islander 18 0.9 4 0.6 12 0.4 0 - 28 0.4 3 1.1 22 0.3 1 0.1 2 0.1 2 0.5 White 1,210 62.9 361 53.3 1,852 59.3 135 73.0 3,639 54.2 189 67.5 3,331 51.3 431 44.7 920 55.3 206 46.8 2 or More Minority Races 2 0.1 1 0.1 2 0.1 1 0.5 3 0.0 0 - 8 0.1 1 0.1 2 0.1 2 0.5 Joint Race (White/Minority) 39 2.0 11 1.6 63 2.0 1 0.5 130 1.9 5 1.8 111 1.7 7 0.7 15 0.9 3 0.7 Race Not Available 402 20.9 201 29.7 731 23.4 36 19.5 1,691 25.2 68 24.3 1,859 28.6 324 33.6 490 29.4 160 36.4 Total 1,924 100 678 100 3,125 100 185 100 6,717 100 280 100 6,491 100 964 100 1,666 100 442 100 Applicant Ethnicity
Hispanic or Latino 726 37.7 281 41.5 1,196 38.3 64 34.6 2,344 34.9 112 40.0 2,410 37.1 371 38.5 713 42.8 190 43.2 Not Hispanic or Latino 828 43.0 236 34.9 1,234 39.5 88 47.6 2,831 42.2 121 43.2 2,461 37.9 347 36.0 539 32.4 132 30.0 Joint (Hisp/Lat / Not Hisp/Lat) 64 3.3 18 2.7 116 3.7 10 5.4 253 3.8 7 2.5 221 3.4 21 2.2 49 2.9 10 2.3 Ethnicity Not Available 306 15.9 142 21.0 578 18.5 23 12.4 1,287 19.2 40 14.3 1,398 21.5 225 23.3 363 21.8 108 24.5 Total 1,924 100 677 100 3,124 100 185 100 6,715 100 280 100 6,490 100 964 100 1,664 100 440 100 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
55 Table 3-4
Home Improvement Loans - Denials by Race and Ethnicity in the City of Jurupa Valley (2018-2022)

Sources: CLC Compliance Technologies, Inc., Lending Patterns, Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council, Dec. 2023

Loan Category Tot % Den. % Tot % Den. % Tot % Den. % Tot % Den. % Tot % Den. % Loan Purpose and Type
Home Improvement Loans 577 100.0 352 100.0 429 100.0 262 100.0 254 100.0 132 100.0 342 100.0 157 100.0 478 100.0 242 100.0 Total 577 100 352 100 429 100 262 100 254 100 132 100 342 100 157 100 478 100 242 100 Applicant Race
American Indian/Alaska Native 8 1.4 7 2.0 3 0.7 3 1.1 3 1.2 1 0.8 11 3.2 11 7.0 6 1.3 4 1.7 Asian 70 12.1 45 12.8 45 10.5 29 11.1 23 9.1 12 9.1 44 12.9 22 14.0 53 11.1 31 12.8 Black or African American 20 3.5 11 3.1 9 2.1 4 1.5 9 3.5 6 4.5 11 3.2 5 3.2 25 5.2 9 3.7 Hawaiian / Pacific Islander 15 2.6 15 4.3 8 1.9 7 2.7 1 0.4 0 - 0 - 0 - 5 1.0 3 1.2 White 352 61.0 208 59.1 257 59.9 149 56.9 152 59.8 74 56.1 166 48.5 67 42.7 232 48.5 122 50.4 2 or More Minority Races 1 0.2 1 0.3 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 1 0.3 1 0.6 1 0.2 1 0.4 Joint Race (White/Minority) 10 1.7 5 1.4 8 1.9 4 1.5 2 0.8 0 - 7 2.0 5 3.2 17 3.6 7 2.9 Race Not Available 102 17.7 61 17.3 99 23.1 66 25.2 64 25.2 39 29.5 104 30.4 48 30.6 140 29.3 66 27.3 Total 578 100 353 100 429 100 262 100 254 100 132 100 344 101 159 101 479 100 243 100 Applicant Ethnicity
Hispanic or Latino 260 45.1 173 49.1 220 51.3 153 58.4 116 45.7 80 60.6 141 41.2 78 49.7 232 48.5 136 56.2 Not Hispanic or Latino 224 38.8 124 35.2 141 32.9 68 26.0 89 35.0 31 23.5 112 32.7 43 27.4 146 30.5 66 27.3 Joint (Hisp/Lat / Not Hisp/Lat) 27 4.7 17 4.8 19 4.4 7 2.7 9 3.5 2 1.5 11 3.2 7 4.5 20 4.2 9 3.7 Ethnicity Not Available 66 11.4 38 10.8 49 11.4 34 13.0 40 15.7 19 14.4 78 22.8 29 18.5 80 16.7 31 12.8 Total 577 100 352 100 429 100 262 100 254 100 132 100 342 100 157 100 478 100 242 100 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
56 The data shows that in Jurupa Valley the White racial group had the highest number of home purchase loans completed – 47.5 percent. Other racial groups - Asian (18.2 percent) and African American ( 4.0 percent) had lower number of purchase loans completed i n Jurupa Valley. The Hispanic ethnic group (not considered a race by the Census and other reporting agencies) had 45.8 percent of all purchase loans originated in Jurupa Valley. Denial rates by race were also analyzed.

In Jurupa Valley, denial rates, as a percent of total denials as shown in Table 3-5, was highest for White ( 45.2%), Hispanic ( 51.5%), Asian ( 13.1%) and African Americans ( 5.2%). This table also compares the completed and denial rates with the population in the City of Jurupa Valley. White, Black or African American and Asian racial groups had more loans completed than their share of the City’s population, while Hispanics had less home purchase loans than their share of the population. There are two significant figures in this table; Asian raci al group, while Asians make up 4.6 percent of the population in Jurupa Valley had 18.2 percent of the purchase loans in Jurupa Valley in 2022. While the largest ethnic group in Jurupa Valley – Hispanics, which make up 71.9 percent of the population, had 45.8 percent of completed purchase loans during the subject time period.

Table 3-5
Home Purchase Loans Compared to Population
By Race and Ethnicity in the City of Jurupa Valley (2022)

(1) Source: US Census, July 1, 2022, (V2022)
(2) Source: CLC Compliance Technologies, Inc., Lending Patterns, Dec. 2023 Tabulations: GRC Associates, Inc., Dec. 2023
1 - Includes conventional and government-assisted (FHA, FSA/RHS and VA) home purchase applications. 2 - Denial rate based on applications that went through the complete underwriting process, and excludes applications withdrawn or files closed for incompleteness.

Race/Ethnicity Pop. % Total % Total %
White 44,658 41.5% 138 45.2% 706 47.5%
Black or African American 3,659 3.4% 16 5.2% 59 4.0% American Indian and Alaska Native 1,184 1.1% 3 1.0% 10 0.7% Asian 4,950 4.6% 40 13.1% 270 18.2%
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 108 0.1% 2 0.7% 5 0.3% Other Race 41,643 38.7% 1 0.3% 29 2.0%
Two or more races 11,407 10.6% 1 0.3% 4 0.3%
Unk/NA 104 34.1% 403 27.1%
Total 107,609 100.0% 305 100.0% 1486 100.0%
Hispanic or Latino (any race) 77,371 71.9% 157 51.5% 680 45.8% Denials/Race Completed
Loans
Demographic Data (1) Home Purchase Loans Data (2)
City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
57 As shown in Table 3 -6, which presents disposition of home purchase loans compared to the population composition in 20 22, Asians were over represented by 13.6 percent, Whites by 6.1 percent and the Black/African American group by 0. 6 percent. Whereas, American Indians, and Hispanic/Latinos were under represented in the City of Jurupa Valley home lending market in 2022. This was especially evident for Hispanic/Latinos (-26.1 percent).

Table 3-6
Disposition of Home Purchase Loans Compared to Population By Race and Ethnicity in the City of Jurupa Valley (2022)

Sources: CLC Compliance Technologies, Inc., Lending Patterns, Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council, Dec. 2023, Home Mortgage Disposition Act (HMDA) data 2022 and US Census 2022

% of Total % of Total
Applications Population
American Indian/Alaska Native 0.7% 1.1% -0.4%
Asian 18.2% 4.6% 13.6%
Black or African American 4.0% 3.4% 0.6%
Hawaiian / Pacific Islander 0.3% 0.1% 0.2%
White 47.6% 41.5% 6.1%
2 or More Minority Races 0.3% 10.6% -10.3%
Joint Race (White/Minority) 2.0% n/a n/a
Race Not Available 27.2% n/a n/a
Other Race n/a 38.7% n/a
Total 100% 100.0% 0%
Applicant Ethnicity
Hispanic or Latino 45.8% 71.9% -26.1%
Not Hispanic or Latino 33.1%
Joint (Hisp/Lat / Not Hisp/Lat) 3.6%
Ethnicity Not Available 17.5%
Total 100%
Race / Ethnicity
% Difference in
Applications to Total
Population
City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
58 Table 3-7 presents the top 15 lenders in the City of Jurupa Valley. These top 15 lenders made almost all the loans originated in the City. Also, most of the purchase loans were to owner occupants, 94.9 percent. Five years ago, the top lender in Jurupa Valley was Wells Fargo Bank, making 290 purchase loans. In the 2022 year – they were not in the top 15. Other banks that were making loans in Jurupa Valley five years ago, are not as active anymore, and these banks include:

Cathay Bank, Flagstar Bank and East West Bank.

Table 3-7
Top 15 Home Purchase Lenders in the City of Jurupa Valley By Ownership (2022)

Sources: CLC Compliance Technologies, Inc., Lending Patterns, Federal Financial Instit utions Examination Council, Dec. 2023, Home Mortgage Disposition Act (HMDA) data, 2022 Table 3 -8 presents home purchasing loans according to the applicant ’s income and gender. It shows that the largest number of applicants for both conventional and government-backed loans had incomes that were more than 120 percent of the c ounty median income. There were 885 residents in this income group applying for a conventional loan. The approval rate for this income group was 86.8 percent. On the other hand, there were just 42 loans approved at the low-income range (0-49 percent) of median in the City of Jurupa Valley.

An analysis of lending patterns for race/ethnicity and income together helps reveal differences among applicants of different races/ethnicities of the same income levels. Although this analysis provides a more in -depth look at lending patterns, it still cannot provide a reason for any discrepancy. Aside from income, many other factors can contribute to the availability of financing, including credit history, the availability and amount of a down payment and knowledge of the home-buying process, among others. The HMDA data does not provide insight into these and Rank Lender # % Share # %
1 United Shore Financial Services, LLC 182 12.3% 167 91.8% 2 21st Mortgage Corporation 135 9.1% 133 98.5%
3 Lennar Mortgage, LLC 106 7.1% 103 97.2%
4 Rocket Mortgage, LLC 77 5.2% 72 93.5%
5 Triad Financial Services, Inc. 60 4.0% 60 100.0%
6 Loandepot.Com, LLC 36 2.4% 36 100.0%
7 Homeamerican Mortgage Corp. 33 2.2% 32 97.0%
8 OCMBC, Inc. 32 2.2% 32 100.0%
9 NMSI, Inc. 29 2.0% 27 93.1%
10 Paramount Residential Mortgage Group, Inc. 25 1.7% 23 92.0% 10 Amwest Funding Corp. 23 1.5% 13 56.5%
12 Credit Human Federal Credit Union 22 1.5% 22 100.0%
13 Home Point Financial Corporation 22 1.5% 21 95.5%
14 Royal Pacific Funding Corporation 20 1.3% 20 100.0%
15 American Financial Network, Inc. 19 1.3% 18 94.7%
Top 15 Lenders in Jurupa V. Total 821 100.0% 779 94.9%
Total in City of Jurupa Valley 911 90.1%
Owner Occupied
Occupancy
City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
59 many other factors. However, the City should continue to monitor the approval rates among ethnic groups and continue to take appropriate actions to remove barriers to financing, including credit counseling, down payment assistance and homebuyer education programs.

Table 3-8
Home Purchase Loans by Income and Gender (2022)

Sources: CLC Compliance Technologies, Inc., Lending Patterns, Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council, Dec. 23, Home Mortgage Disposition Act (HMDA) data, 2022

Loan Category Count % ($000) % Units % ($000) % Count % ($000) % Count % ($000) % Loan Purpose and Type
Purchase - Conventional 1,232 83.0 549,040 80.5 897 80.7 445,135 79.6 61 89.7 19,325 87.1 274 90.1 84,580 84.0 Purchase - Government 252 17.0 133,140 19.5 215 19.3 114,165 20.4 7 10.3 2,855 12.9 30 9.9 16,120 16.0 Total 1,484 100 682,180 100 1,112 100 559,300 100 68 100 22,180 100 304 100 100,700 100 Applicant Income
Low (0-49% of Median) 70 4.7 25,190 3.7 40 3.6 18,470 3.3 2 2.9 760 3.4 28 9.2 5,960 5.9 Moderate (50-79% of Median) 149 10.0 28,045 4.1 62 5.6 14,400 2.6 12 17.6 1,910 8.6 75 24.7 11,735 11.7 Middle (80-119% of Median) 318 21.4 118,240 17.3 212 19.1 89,100 15.9 31 45.6 8,655 39.0 75 24.7 20,485 20.3 Upper (>=120% of Median) 885 59.6 481,015 70.5 748 67.3 414,910 74.2 20 29.4 8,780 39.6 117 38.5 57,325 56.9 Income Not Available 62 4.2 29,690 4.4 50 4.5 22,420 4.0 3 4.4 2,075 9.4 9 3.0 5,195 5.2 Total 1,484 100 682,180 100 1,112 100 559,300 100 68 100 22,180 100 304 100 100,700 100 Tract/BNA Characteristics
Substantially Minority 1,450 97.7 660,860 96.9 1,081 97.2 540,305 96.6 68 100.0 22,180 100.0 301 99.0 98,375 97.7 Not Substantially Minority 34 2.3 21,320 3.1 31 2.8 18,995 3.4 0 - 0 - 3 1.0 2,325 2.3 Total 1,484 100 682,180 100 1,112 100 559,300 100 68 100 22,180 100 304 100 100,700 100 Low (0-49% of Median) 37 2.5 11,835 1.7 18 1.6 6,060 1.1 2 2.9 560 2.5 17 5.6 5,215 5.2 Moderate (50-79% of Median) 76 5.1 30,250 4.4 58 5.2 25,680 4.6 3 4.4 785 3.5 15 4.9 3,785 3.8 Middle (80-119% of Median) 853 57.5 379,715 55.7 625 56.2 302,655 54.1 42 61.8 13,630 61.5 186 61.2 63,430 63.0 Upper (>=120% of Median) 518 34.9 260,380 38.2 411 37.0 224,905 40.2 21 30.9 7,205 32.5 86 28.3 28,270 28.1 NA 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 -
Total 1,484 100 682,180 100 1,112 100 559,300 100 68 100 22,180 100 304 100 100,700 100 Low/Mod and/or Sub Minority 1,450 97.7 660,860 96.9 1,081 97.2 540,305 96.6 68 100.0 22,180 100.0 301 99.0 98,375 97.7 All Other Census Tracts 34 2.3 21,320 3.1 31 2.8 18,995 3.4 0 - 0 - 3 1.0 2,325 2.3 Total 1,484 100 682,180 100 1,112 100 559,300 100 68 100 22,180 100 304 100 100,700 100 Applicant Sex
Male 512 34.5 238,120 34.9 391 35.2 195,115 34.9 19 27.9 6,585 29.7 102 33.6 36,420 36.2 Female 338 22.8 137,690 20.2 216 19.4 107,880 19.3 18 26.5 3,910 17.6 104 34.2 25,900 25.7 Joint 525 35.4 253,005 37.1 413 37.1 209,325 37.4 28 41.2 10,710 48.3 84 27.6 32,970 32.7 Not Applicable 105 7.1 51,835 7.6 88 7.9 45,450 8.1 3 4.4 975 4.4 14 4.6 5,410 5.4 Total 1,480 100 680,650 100 1,108 100 557,770 100 68 100 22,180 100 304 100 100,700 100 Total Applications Originated Approved Not Accepted Denied City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
60 Lending Practices
Subprime Lending
According to the Federal Reserve, “prime” mortgages are offered to persons with excellent credit and employment history and income adequate to support the loan amount. “Subprime” loans are loans to borrowers who have less-than-perfect credit history, poor employment history, or other factors such as limited income. By providing loans to those who do not meet the credit standards for borrowers in the prime market, subprime lending can and does serve a critical role in increasing levels of homeownership. Households that are interested in buying a home but have blemishes in their credit record, insufficient credit history or nontraditional credit sources, might otherwise be unable to purchase a home. The subprime loan market offers these borrowers opportunities to obtain loans that they would be unable to realize in the prime loan market.

Subprime lenders generally have interest rates that are higher than those in the prime market and often lack the regulatory oversight required for prime lenders because they are not owned by regulated financial institutions. In the past decade, however, many large and well -known banks became involved in the subprime market either through acquisitions of other firms or by initiating loans that were subprime directly.

Most subprime loans provide families with payments for the first few years at a low “teaser” rate.

After that, the loans reset every six months or year to a higher, fully indexed rate, which can cost borrowers hundreds of extra dollars each month. This extra expense has increased the housing cost burden of many families and for many has ultimately resulted in foreclosure.

Predatory Lending
With an active housing market, potential predatory lending practices by financial institutions may arise. Predatory lending involves abusive loan practices usually targeting minority homeowners or those with less -than-perfect credit histories. The predatory practices typically include high fees, hidden costs and unnecessary insurance and larger repayments due in later years. One of the most common predatory lending practices is placing borrowers into higher interest r ate loans than called for by their credit status. Although the borrowers may be eligible for a loan in the “prime” market, they are directed into more expensive and higher fee loans in the “subprime” market. In other cases, fraudulent appraisal data is used to mislead homebuyers into purchasing overvalued homes, or fraudulent or misrepresented financial data is used to encourage homebuyers into assuming a larger loan than can be afforded. Both cases almost inevitably result in foreclosure.

In recent years, predatory lending has also penetrated the home improvement financing market.

Seniors and ethnic minority homeowners are the usual targets. In general, home improvement financing is more difficult to obtai n than home purchase financing. Many homeowners hav e a City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
61 debt-to-income ratio that is too high to qualify for home improvement loans in the prime market and become targets of predatory lending in the subprime market. Seniors are often swindled into installing unnecessary devices or making unnecessary improve ments that are bundled with unreasonable financing terms.

Predatory lending is a growing fair housing issue. Predatory as well as discriminatory lending is addressed under the Fair Housing Act of 1968, which requires equal treatment in terms and conditions of housing opportunities and credit regardless of race, religion, color, national origin, family status or disability. This applies to loan originators as well as the secondary market. The Equal Credit Opportunity Act of 1972 requires equal treatment in l oan terms and availability of credit for all of the above categories, as well as ag e, sex and marital status. Lenders that engage in predatory lending would violate these acts if they were to target ethnic minority or elderly households to buy higher -priced and unequal loan products, treat loans for protected classes differently than those of comparably creditworthy White applicants, or have policies or practices that have a disproportionate effect on the protected classes.

Data available to investigate the presence of predatory lending are extremely limited. At present, HMDA data are the most comprehensive available for evaluating lending practices. However, as discussed before, the HMDA data lack the financial details of the loan terms to conclude any kind of predatory lending. Efforts at the national level are pushing for increased reporting requirements in order to curb predatory lending.

Predatory lending and unsound investment practices, which are central to the current home foreclosure crisis, have resulted in a credit crunch that has spread well beyond the housing market and is now affecting the cost of credit for local government borrowing, as well as local property tax revenues. To curb the future negative impact of predatory lending, in June 2009 the governor of California signed into law Assembly Bill 260, reforming mortgage lending and specifically banning predatory lending practices. The legislation created a fiduciary duty standard for mortgage brokers, eliminated compensation incentives that encourage the steering of borrowers into risky loans and established regulations on prepayment penalties.5

5State of California AB 260
City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
62 4. Public Policies and Practices
Public policies established at the state, regional and local levels can affect housing development and therefore the range of housing choices available to residents. This section discusses the various public policies that could influence fair housing choice in the City of Jurupa Valley.

City Policies and Programs Affecting Housing Development The Jurupa Valley General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, Consolidated Plan and other documents have been reviewed to evaluate the following potential impediments to fair housing choice and affordable housing development:
▪ Local zoning, building and occupancy codes.
▪ Provision for a variety of housing types.
▪ Public and administrative policies affecting housing activities. ▪ Moratoriums or growth management plans.
▪ Residential development review process and fees.
▪ Community representation on planning boards and commissions.

Local Zoning, Building and Occupancy Codes
Land Use and Zoning Controls
The City's policies for development are set forth in the Land Use Element of the City’s General Plan, which was adopted by the City on September 7, 2017 . The Land Use Element identifies the location, distribution, and density of land uses throughout the City which are implemented through its corresponding Zoning Districts . As presented in Table 4-1, Jurupa Valley's Land Use Element establishes nine residential land uses. Three of these are rural designations with very low density (1- to 5-acre minimums). The remaining six categories range from Country Neighborhood (LDR) of 2 dwelling units per acre (DU/Ac) to Hi ghest Density Residential (HHDR) of 25 DU/Ac.

These designations provide a range of low to high density development opportunities. In addition, the Land Use Element has a Town Center Overlay (TCO) and Mixed-Use Overlay (MUO) that allows for residential uses as seen in the table below. Figure 4-1 shows the 2017 General Plan Land Use Map.

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
63 Table 4-1
Residential Land-Use Designations
General Plan Land Use Designation Density (units/acre) Description Small Farm (RR) 1 unit/5 acres Single-family detached residence on parcels of at least 5 acres
Ranch (EDR) 1 unit/2 acres Single-family detached residence on parcels of at least 2 acres
Rural Neighborhood (VLDR) 1 unit/1 acre Single-family detached residences on parcels of 1 to 2 acres
Country Neighborhood (LDR) 1 to 2 Single-family detached residences on parcels of ½ to 1 acre
Medium Density Residential (MDR) 2 to 5 Single-family attached and detached residences
Medium-High Density Residential
(MHDR) 5 to 8 Single-family attached and detached
residences
High Density Residential (HDR) 8 to 14 Single-family attached and detached residences
Very High Density Residential
(VHDR) 14 to 20
Single-family attached residences
and all types of multi-family
dwellings
Highest Density Residential (HHDR) 20 to 25 Multi-family dwellings, includes apartments and condominiums
Mixed Use Overlay (MUO) 8 to 20
Allows a mix of uses. Flexible
residential density and development
standards are applied.

Town Center Overlay (TCO) 5 to 25
Applied to three historic core areas.

Promotes infill and improvement of
established town centers.

Source: City of Jurupa Valley General Plan 2017

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
64 Source: City of Jurupa Valley - 2017 General Plan
Figure 4-1
2017 General Plan Land Use Map

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
65 Upon incorporation as a city in 2011, Jurupa Valley adopted the Riverside County Zoning Code by reference. Table 4 -2 summarizes the City’s residential zoning districts and their development standards, per the Housing Element Update, certified by HCD on April 22, 2022 . The following section identifies several sections of the Code to be amended to better facilitate the provision of a variety of housing types to meet the diverse needs of Jurupa Valley residents.

Table 4-2
Residential Development Standards
Zoning
District
Min Lot
Size
Minimum Lot Max
Building
Height
(stories/
Feet)
Min
Front
Yard
(feet)
Min
Interior
Side Yard
(feet)
Min
Corner
Side Yard
(feet)
Min Rear
Yard
(feet)
Lot
Coverage
Width
(feet)
Depth
(feet)
Frontage
(feet)
RR 21,780 80 --- --- 40-50 --- --- --- --- ---
R-1/R-1A 7,200 60 100 60 3-story/
40 20 10% of
lot width 10 10 50%
R-A 20,000 100 150 --- 40-50 20 --- --- --- ---
R-2 7,200 --- --- --- 3-story/
40 20 10% of
lot width 10 10 60%
R-2A 7,200 --- --- --- 2-story/
30 20 5 --- 10 60%
R-3 7,200 60 100 --- 50-75 10 5 10 10 50%
R-3A 9,000 --- --- --- 50-75 10 5 10 10 50%
R-4 3,500 40 80 --- 40-50 20 5 10 10 ---
R-5 None n/a n/a n/a 50-75 50 50 50 50 ---
R-6 5,000 --- --- 30 35-50 10 --- --- 10 ---
R-T 3,600/
7,200 40/60 100 30/45 40 20 5 5 5 ---
PUD --- --- --- --- --- 10 5 10 10 varies
Source: City of Jurupa Valley Housing Element Update, Certified by HCD on April 22, 2022

The governmental factor that most directly influences the supply and cost of housing is permitted densities, with higher-density housing reducing land costs on a per-unit basis and thus facilitating the development of affordable housing. Although housing affordability alone is not a fair housing issue, many low- and moderate-income households are disproportionately concentrated in groups protected under the fair housing laws, such as persons with disabilities and persons of color.

When the availability of affordable housing is limited, this indirectly affects the housing choices available to groups protected by fair housing laws.

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
66 Based on an analysis of affordable housing development in Western Riverside County and discussions with local developers, the City of Jurupa Valley has determined that a base density of 25 units/acre is appropriate to accommodate the City’s lower income housing needs ( source:

Jurupa Valley Housing Element Update, certified by HCD on April 22, 2022). The City plans to amend the Land Use Map of the General Plan to add 69.2 acres of HHDR -designated land with appropriate zoning to allow multi -family ownership and rental housing. The HHDR land use designation allows a density of 21 -25 dwelling units per acre, with additional density poss ible through state-mandated density bonuses. The additional acreage will enable the City of Jurupa Valley to meet and exceed its 2021-2029 RHNA while also protecting the rural, country aesthetics of the City.

Parking Requirements
Parking requirements do not constrain the development of housing directly. However, parking requirements may reduce the amount of available lot areas for residential development. The City determines the required number of parking spaces based on the type and size of the residential unit and has found the required parking spaces to be necessary to accommodate the number of vehicles typically associated with each residence. Table 4 -3 provides further details regarding parking for residential development.

Table 4-3
Residential Parking Standards
Type of Residential Development Required Parking Spaces (off street)

1. Single family dwelling unit Two spaces per dwelling unit

2. Multi family dwelling unit Studio or 1 BR: 1.25 spaces per unit 2 BD: 2.25 spaces per unit
3 BD: 2.75 spaces per unit (add 1 space per employee)
Multi Family PRD: 1.5 spaces per unit

3. Planned Residential
Development
1 BR: 1.5 space per unit
2 BR or more: 2.5 spaces per unit

4. Senior Housing See Single-Family and Multi-Family requirements

5. Mobile Home Parks Two spaces per trailer or mobile home space* (add guest space per 8 mobile home spaces)

6. Accessory Dwelling Units 1 space per unit
Source: Jurupa Valley Municipal Code, 2021

Inclusionary Housing
Inclusionary housing is a policy ensuring that a portion of new housing units are reserved for working persons of modest means who already live in or wish to move to the community, such as teachers, police and fire personnel, health care workers, sales clerks, and administrative support staff. On August 18th, 2022, The City of Jurupa Valley adopted its Inclusionary Housing Ordinance City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
67 (IHO). The ordinance applies to all residential or mixed-use development projects approved after September 17, 2022. The City has put on its website links to a collection of helpful documents, as well as a link to the ordinance text, to ensure applicants and the public are aware of the requirements for new residential development.

Density Bonus
California Government Code §65915-65918 requires local governments to grant a density bonus of at least 20% (5% for condominiums) and an additional incentive, or financially equivalent incentive(s), to a developer of a residential project that agrees to provide at least:
• At least 5% of the housing units are restricted to very low-income residents. • At least 10% of the housing units are restricted to lower-income residents. • At least 10% of the housing units in a for-sale common interest development are restricted to moderate income residents.
• 100% of the housing units (other than manager’s units) are restricted to very low, lower and moderate-income residents (with a maximum of 20% moderate). • At least 10% of the housing units are for transitional foster youth, disabled veterans or homeless persons, with rents restricted at the very low income level. • At least 20% of the housing units are for low income college students in housing dedicated for full-time students at accredited colleges.
• The project donates at least one acre of land to the city o r county for very low income units, and the land has the appropriate general plan designation, zoning, permits and approvals, and access to public facilities needed for such housing. • The project is a senior citizen housing development (no affordable units required). • The project is a mobile home park age -restricted to senior citizens (no affordable units required).

Density bonus law also applies to senior housing and projects that include a childcare facility. In addition to the density bonus stated above, the statute includes a sliding scale that requires:
▪ An additional 2.5% density bonus for each additional increase of 1% in the number of Very Low income units above the initial 5% threshold;
▪ A density increase of 1.5% for each additional 1% increase in th e number of Low income units above the initial 10% threshold; and
▪ A 1% density increase for each 1% increase in the number of Moderate income units above the initial 10% threshold.

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
68 These bonuses reach a maximum density bonus of 35% when a project provides 11% very low income units, 20% low -income units, or 40% moderate income units. In addition to a density bonus, at the discretion of the approving jurisdiction, developers may also be eligible for one of the following concessions or incentives:
▪ Reductions in site development standards and modifications of zoning and architectural design requirements, including reduced setbacks and parking standards; ▪ Mixed used zoning that will reduce the cost of the housing, if the non-residential uses are compatible with the housing development and other development in the area; and ▪ Other regulatory incentives or concessions that result in “identifiable, financially sufficient, and actual cost reductions.”
Jurisdictions may not impose any development (or density) standard that, by itself, would preclude the construction of a project with the density bonus and the incentives or concessions to which the developer is entitled. To achieve compliance with the state density bonus law, jurisdictions must reevaluate their development standards in relation to the maximum achievable densities for multifamily housing.

State density bonus law also specifies alternative parking standards which may be utilized at the request of the developer; use of these standards does not count towards a project's development incentives/concessions. These reduced parking standards are inclusive of guest parking and handicapped parking, may be tandem and/or uncovered, and are applicable to the entire development project.
▪ Zero to one bedroom: one on-site parking space
▪ Two to three bedrooms: two on-site parking spaces
▪ Four or more bedrooms: two and one-half on-site parking spaces AB 744, signed into law in October 2015, further amends density bonus law to provide additional by-right reductions in parking for density bonus projects. Specifically, for density bonus projects which include the maximum percentage of low income or very low income units (20% and 11%, respectively) and located within one-half mile of a major transit stop with "unobstructed access", upon the request of the developer, the jurisdiction shall not impose a vehicular parking ratio, inclusive of handicapped and guest parking, that exceeds 0.5 spaces per bedroom. Senior rental housing and housing for special needs populations also qualify for by -right parking reductions when either paratransit service is provided, or unobstructed access to a fixed bus route service that operates at least eight times per day is available within one-half mile.

Jurupa Valley will be undertaking a com prehensive update to its Zoning Code beginning in 2020.

As part of this update, the City will amend its provisions for density bonuses to provide consistency with current state law and the City’s adopted Housing Element policies.

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
69 Building Codes
Building and safety codes are adopted to preserve public health and safety, and ensure the construction of safe and decent housing. These codes and standards also have the potential to increase the cost of housing construction or maintenance. The City of Jurupa Valley has adopted the latest edition of the California Building Standards Code. Other codes commonly adopted by reference within the region include the California Mechanical Code, the California Plumbing Code, the California or National Electric C ode, the Uniform Housing Code, and the California Fire Code.

The City has not adopted any local amendments that constrain the development, maintenance, or preservation of housing.

The City’s building codes require that new residential construction comply with the American with Disabilities Act (ADA) per federal law. ADA regulations include requirements for a minimum percentage of units in new developments to be fully accessible to the physical disabled.

The City of Jurupa Valley has established a Code Enforcement program to ensure a high quality of life throughout the communities and maintain property values. Code compliance in the City is a responsive program under which property inspections are done only when inspection requests and complaints are rec eived. Such a system may result in under -reporting of code compliance issues, particularly with regard to the rental housing stock. Often, tenants fear retaliation from the landlords and are therefore less willing to report an issue. Legal residency issues or language barriers may be another obstacle for reporting code compliance issues.

Occupancy Standards
Local occupancy standards more stringent than those established by the State have been deemed unconstitutional by the courts. All California jurisdictions are mandated to follow the occupancy standards established under the State Uniform Housing Code (UHC). The UHC requires that every dwelling, except studio apartments, have one room with at least 120 square feet of floor area.

Two persons ar e permitted to use a room for sleeping purposes if it has a total area of not less than 70 square feet. When more than two persons occupy a room, the required floor area must be increased by 50 square feet per occupant. The UHC is based on health and saf ety considerations, and is not intended to discriminate based on familial status. The Jurupa Valley Zoning Ordinance does not contain residential occupancy standards.

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
70 Variety of Housing Opportunity
Through its zoning powers, Jurupa Valley provides development opportunities for a variety of housing types to promote diversity in housing price and style to meet the needs of its residents.

Some of these housing types include single-family, multi -family, second dwelling units, manufactured homes, mobile home parks, licensed community care facilities, employee housing for seasonal or migrant workers, assisted living facilities, emergency shelters, supportive housing, transitional housing, and single room occupancy (SRO) units. Table 4-4 summarizes the housing types permitted in each of the Jurupa Valley zoning districts where residential uses are permitted.

Additional information about these housing types are included below.

Single- and Multi -Family Uses. One-family dwellings are permit ted uses in most residential zones. Multi-family dwellings are permitted in the R-4 zone, as well as the R-2, R-3, and R-6 zones with the approval of a Site Development Permit. The Site Development Permit process is a discretionary review process that diff ers from conditional use permit review in that it is strictly concerned with design and the application of conditions to address traffic safety, parking, noise and other standards, not land use or compatibility. Conditions of approval may be imposed that must be met prior to or concurrent with project development. However, Site Development Permits are less costly and processed more quickly than conditional use permits. Site Development Permits for residential projects are typically acted upon by the Planning Director and generally do not require Planning Commission approval, except for special cases such as cellular sites and detached accessory structures.

Manufactured Housing. State law requires local governments to permit manufactured and mobile homes meeting federal safety and construction standards on a permanent foundation (and permanently connected to water and sewer utilities, where available), in all single -family residential zoning districts (§65852.3 of the California Government Code). For purposes of permit issuance, Jurupa Valley permits mobile homes on a foundation system on all lots zoned to permit single family dwellings. The installation of manufactured homes not on foundations is allowed whenever it is specifically provided for in t he various zone classifications, and is subject to the requirements and standards set forth in those zones. A mobile home permitted in the R-R and R- A zones, however, is subject to additional development standards regarding minimum floor area and lot size. These requirements are standard for most California jurisdictions and are similar to those of Riverside County.

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
71 Table 4-4
Jurupa Valley Permitted Uses by Zone
Zoning
District
One-
Family
Dwelling
Multiple
Family
Dwelling
Second
Units
Congregate
Care Facilities
Emergency
Shelter
Transitional/
Supportive
Housing
Farm
Worker
Housing
Employee
Housing SRO
Manufactured
Housing/
Mobile-Home
Mobile-
Home
Park

Planned
Residential
Development
R-R/R-RO P NP P NP NP P NP NP NP P CUP P#
R-1/R-1A P NP P NP NP P NP NP NP P CUP P#
R-A P NP P NP NP P NP NP NP P CUP P#
R-2 P P* P P* NP P NP P* P* P CUP P#
R-2A P P* P P* NP P NP P* P* P CUP P#
R-3 P* P* P P* NP P NP P* P* P CUP P#
R-3A P NP P NP NP P NP NP NP P CUP P#
R-T P NP P NP NP P NP P* P* P CUP P#
R-T-R P NP P NP NP P NP NP NP P P#
R-4 P* P* P P* NP P NP P* P* P CUP P#
R-6 P P P NP NP P NP P P P CUP P#
PUD PUD PUD PUD PUD NP PUD PUD PUD PUD PUD PUD P#
I-P NP NP NP NP P NP NP P* NP P* NP NP
A1 P NP P NP NP P P* NP NP P* CUP P#
A-2 P NP P NP NP P P* NP NP P* CUP P#
W-2 P NP P NP NP P NP NP NP NP NP P#
R-D P P* P NP NP P NP NP NP P CUP P#
N-A P NP P NP NP P NP NP NP P* NP P#
P = Permitted by Right; CUP = Conditional Use Permit; NP = Not Permitted; P* = Site Development Permit; P# = Requires PC/CC review; PUD = Allowed with PUD; rezoning required Notes: 1. Transitional and Supportive housing subject to same requirements that apply to standard residential uses.

2. Employee housing for six or fewer persons is treated as a single-family structure and residential use.

Source: City of Jurupa General Plan 2017
City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
72 Residential Care Facilities. The Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Services Act (§5115 and §5116 of the California Welfare and Institutions Code ) declares that mentally and physically disabled persons are entitled to live in normal residential surroundings. The use of property for the care of six or fewer mentally disordered or otherwise handicapped persons is required by law.

A state-authorized, certified, or authorized family care home, foster home, or group home serving six or fewer persons with disabilities or dependent and neglected children on a 24-hour a-day basis is considered a residential use to be permitted in all residential zones. No local agency can impose stricter zoning or building and safety standards on these homes (commonly referred to as “group” homes) for six or fewer persons than are required of other permitted residential uses in the zone.

The Lanterman Act covers only licensed residential care facilities.

The City of Jurupa Valley defines congregate care residential facilities as “a housing arrangement, developed pursuant to Article XIX of the Zoning Code, where nonmedical care and supervision are provided, including meals and social, recreational, homemaking and security services.” Congregate care facilities are currently permitted in the R-2, R-3 and R-4 zones, subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The Code does not currently contain explicit provisions for small (6 or fewer) residential care facilities, and is thus does not currently comply with the Lanterman Act. As part of the comprehensive Zoning Code update, the City will amend its provisions for licensed residential care facilities to ensure consistency with the Lanterman Act.

Emergency Shelters. An emergency shelter is a facility that provide s temporary shelter and feeding of indigents or disaster victims, operated by a public or non-profit agency. State law requires jurisdictions to identify adequate sites for housing that will be made available through appropriate zoning and development standards to facilitate and encourage the development of a variety of housing types for all income levels, including emergency shelters and transitional housing (§65583(c)(1) of the California Government Code ). State law (SB 2) requires that local jurisdictions make provisions in their zoning codes to permit emergency shelters by right in at least one zoning district where adequate capacity is available to accommodate at least one year-round shelter. Local jurisdictions may establish standards to re gulate the development of emergency shelters.

Jurupa Valley permits emergency shelters in its Industrial Park (I -P) zone, subject to the development standards allowed under SB 2, such as minimum floor area for each client, minimum interior waiting and client intake areas, off-street parking and outdoor lighting requirements, and the requirement for an on -site manager and at least one additional staff member to be present on-site during hours of operation. The City has a number of large, vacant I -P zoned sites totaling 290 acres. Upon incorporation, the City adopted the Riverside County Zoning Code by reference.

The County Zoning Code contains distance requirements for emergency shelters that extend beyond the basic 300 -foot distance between two shelters a s permitted by SB 2. The City will remove the distance requirement as part of the Zoning Code update.

Transitional and Supportive Housing. State law (SB 2) requires local jurisdictions to address the provisions for transitional and supportive housing. U nder Housing Element law, transitional housing means buildings configured as rental housing developments, but operated under program requirements that require the termination of assistance and reassignment of the assisted unit to City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
73 another eligible program participant at a predetermined future point in time that shall be no less than 6 months from the beginning of the assistance (California Government Code §65582(h)). For example, a multi-family dwelling that is designated as a temporary (typically 6 months to 1 year) residence for abused women and children, pending relocation to more permanent housing.

Supportive housing means housing with no limit on length of stay, that is occupied by the target population, and that is linked to an onsite or off-site service that assists the supportive housing resident in retaining the housing, improving his or her health status, and maximizing his or her ability to live and, when possible, work in the community. Target population means persons with low incomes who have one or more disabilities, including mental illness, HIV or AIDS, substance abuse, or other chronic health condition, or individuals eligible for services provided pursuant to the Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Services Act (Division 4.5 commenci ng with §4500 of the Welfare and Institutions Code ) and may include, among other populations, adults, emancipated minors, families with children, elderly persons, young adults aging out of the foster care system, individuals exiting from institutional set tings, veterans, and homeless people (California Government Code §§65582(f) and (g)). Accordingly, state law establishes transitional and supportive housing as residential uses and therefore, local governments cannot treat these uses differently from othe r similar types of residential uses (e.g., requiring a use permit when other residential uses of similar function do not require a use permit). The City of Jurupa Valley’s Zoning Code currently does not include provisions for transitional or supportive housing. The City will include provisions for transitional and supportive housing as part of the Zoning Code update consistent with SB 2, as provided in Program HE 3.1.9 of the City’s adopted General Plan.

Single Room Occupancy (SRO). AB 2634 mandates that local jurisdictions address the provision of housing options for extremely low-income households, including Single Room Occupancy units (SRO). SRO units are typically one room units intended for occupancy by a single individual. It is distinct from a studio or efficiency unit, in that a studio is a one -room unit that must contain a kitchen and a bathroom. Although SRO units are not required to have a kitchen or bathroom, many SROs have one or the other. There are minimum standards for SROs (including a minimum floor area requirement) under the California Health and Safety Code.

The City of Jurupa Valley’s Zoning Code does not specifically address SROs. As part of the upcoming Zoning Code update, the City will include provisions to address SRO housing.

Farm Worker and Employee Housing. The California Employee Housing Act requires that housing for six or fewer employees be treated as a regular residential use. In general, the California Health and Safety Code §17008(a) defines “employee housing” as “any portion of any housing accommodation, or property upon which a housing accommodation is located, if all of the following factors exist:
(1) The accommodations consist of any living quarters, dwelling, boardinghouse, tent, bunkhouse, maintenance of-way car, mobile home, manufactured home, recreational vehicle, travel trailer, or other housing accommodations, maintained in one or more buildings or one or more sites, and the premises upon which they are situated or the area set aside and provided for parking of mobile homes or camping of five or more employees by the employer.

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
74 (2) The accommodations are maintained in connection with any work or place where work is being performed, whether or not rent is involved.” Section 17005 of the California Health and Safety Code identifies the few types of employees excluded, and Section 17008 provides a detailed definition of employee housing. The Employee Housing Act further defines housing for agricultural workers consisting of 36 beds or 12 units be treated as an agricultural use and permitted where agricultural uses are permitted.

Section 17005 of the California Health and Safety Code identifies the few types of employees excluded, and Section 17008 provides a detailed definition of employee housing. The Employee Housing Act further defines housing for agricultural workers consisting of 36 beds or 12 units be treated as an agricultural use and permitted where agricultural uses are permitted. The City of Jurupa Valley permits agricultural uses in a number of its residential zones, although there are no large-scale agricultural properties or businesses in the City at this time. The Zoning Code does not specifically address farm worker housing in residential zones, but does allow farm worker housing in the City’s agricultural zones (A-1 and A-2) with Site Development Permit approval, and single- family dwellings are permitted by right in these zones. As part of the comprehensive Zoning Code update, the City will amend the Zoning Code to address the requirements of the Employee Housing Act.

Definition of Family
A city’s zoning ordinance can restrict access to housing for individuals living together but failing to qualify as a “family” by the definition specified in the document. Even if the ordinance provides a broad definition, deciding what constitutes a “family” should be avoided by cities to prevent confusion or unintentional restrictiveness. Particularly, when the zoning ordinance uses terms such as single-family homes, defining family in too-detailed terms could restrict access to housing for certain segments of the population.

Jurupa Valley’s Zoning Cod e defines family as “an individual or two or more persons related by blood or marriage, or a group of not more than five persons, excluding servants, who are not related by blood or marriage, living together as a single housekeeping unit in a dwelling unit.” There are a number of state and federal rules that govern the definition of family, including the Federal Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988, the California Fair Housing and Employment Act, the California Supreme Court case, City of Santa Barbara v Adamson (1980), and the California Constitution privacy clauses that have prompted redefining family. Many traditional zoning definitions of family required household members to be related; however, this definition discriminated against disabled persons sharing housing, and also against other unrelated persons living together, even though related individuals with similar household sizes were allowed to live together. Pursuant to the City’s General Plan Program HE 3.1.9, this definition will be am ended to remove: 1) any reference to the number of persons that can be considered a “family,” and 2) any reference to how members of a “family” are to be related. This amendment will be processed as part of the comprehensive Zoning Code update.

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
75 Zoning Provisions for Accessory Dwelling Units (“Second” Units) Accessory dwelling units, or ADUs, are attached or detached dwelling units that provide complete independent living facilities for one or more persons, including permanent provisions for living, sleeping, cooking, and sanitation. ADUs can serve as an alternative source of affordable housing for lower income households and seniors. These units typically rent for less than apartments of comparable size. California law requires local jurisdictions to adopt ordinances that establish the conditions under which ADUs are permitted (California Government Code, §65852.2), and requires local governments to use a ministerial, rather than discretionary process for approving ADUs. A ministerial process is intended to reduce permit processing periods and development costs, because ADU applications that comply with local zoning regulations and standards can be approved without a public hearing.

In December 2020, the City of Jurupa Valley adopted a new Acc essory Dwelling Units (ADUs) Ordinance. This ordinance included updates to clarify the different types of ADUs permitted and to incentivize an increase in housing citywide. In Jurupa Valley, ADUs are defined as an attached or detached residential dwelling unit that is 1,000 square feet in size or less that provides complete living facilities for one or more persons, including permanent provisions for living, sleeping, eating, cooking, and sanitation, and is located on a lot with a proposed or existing single dwelling unit or multiple dwelling units.

Reasonable Accommodation for Persons with Disabilities
Under the federal Fair Housing Act, the City is required to make reasonable accommodations in rules, policies, practices, and services w hen such accommodations may be necessary to afford a person with a disability the equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling. Such accommodations may include the relaxation of parking standards and structural modifications such as wheelchair ramps.

Building and development standards may constrain the ability of persons with disabilities to live in housing units that are suited to their needs. The City considers requests for reasonable accommodation when requests are made. The City develop ed formal, written procedures for reasonable accommodations as part of the Zoning Code update – which became Section 9.310 of the Municipal Code. It is the policy of the City of Jurupa Valley, pursuant to the Federal Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988 and t he California Fair Employment and Housing Act (hereafter "fair housing laws"), to provide individuals with disabilities reasonable accommodation in rules, regulations, policies, practices, and procedures to ensure an equal opportunity for access to housing and facilitate the development of housing for individuals with disabilities. The City formally established a procedure for making requests for reasonable accommodation in or modification of land use, zoning and building regulations, policies, practices and procedures of the jurisdiction to comply fully with the intent and purpose of fair housing laws.

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
76 The City of Jurupa Valley has adopted the 2019 California Building Standards Code. Other codes commonly adopted by reference within the region include the California Mechanical Code, the California Plumbing Code, the California or National Electric Code, the Uniform Housing Code, and the California Fire Code. Less common are the California Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, the Urban -Wildland Interface Code, and the Uniform Code for Building Conservation. The City has not adopted any local amendments that constrain the development, maintenance, or preservation of housing The City’s Housing Element, certified on April 22, 2022, establishes the following programs to promote housing accessibility:
▪ HE 1.1.21 Mixed Housing Types and Densities . Continue to work with residential developers to develop a range of housing types and densities for all income levels, including affordable housing, using creative planning concepts such as traditional neighborhood design, small lot subdivisions, planned unit developments, area and specific plans, and mixed-use development
▪ HE 1.1.22 Lanterman Act Ordinance. Update the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code disability accessibility provisions to ensure consistency with state law, including all requirements for the Lanterman Act.
▪ HE 1.1.23 Affordable Housing for Disabled Persons. Encourage, and as budget allows, help support programs providing increased opportunities for disabled persons in affordable residential units rehabilitated or constructed through City or County programs.

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
77 Public Policies Concerning Community Development and Housing Activities Pursuant to California state law, the housing element of every community’s general plan is required to be reviewed by the state Housing and Community Development Department (HCD) to assure compliance with housing laws. An importan t criterion of HCD approval of any housing element includes a determination that the local jurisdiction’s policies do not unduly constrain the maintenance, improvement and development of a variety of housing choices for all income levels.

HCD has reviewed Jurupa Valley’s 20 21-2029 Housing Element and determined the City’s residential land use regulations and procedures do not serve as a constraint, and have certified the City’s Housing Element as in compliance with State law.

An important component of the Housing Element is the City’s description of what it hopes to achieve during the current planning period. This is accomplished with a statement of goals, policies, actions, and quantified objectives on the maintenance, preservation, improvement, an d development of housing to help meet the housing needs of all residents. The objectives and actions described in Table 4-5 reflect the assessment of the City’s housing needs and summarize Housing Element programs, responsible parties, and anticipated time frames for their implementation. All items in Table 4-5 are developed to further the goals set forth by the City and to meet newly implemented state and federal housing laws for the requirements of the 6th cycle and the needs of the growing community. In addition to the Housing Action Plan, the City conducted a Fair Housing Assessment, as required by HCD’s Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) guidelines . T he analysis includes a specific matrix of Fair Housing action items - as presented in Table 4-5 - that establishes a comprehensive set of goals and policies to address the community’s housing needs.

Moratoriums/Growth Management
The City of Jurupa Valley does not have any building moratoriums or growth management plans that limit housing construction.

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
78 Table 4-5
City of Jurupa Valley Housing Element Goals and Policies Goals Policy
Goal HE 1:

Encourage and, where possible, assist in
the development of quality housing to
meet the City’s share of the region’s
housing needs for all income levels and
for special needs populations.

▪ HE 1.1.1. General Plan and Zoning Amendments. Amend General Plan and Zoning Ordinance and Map to designate 62.7 acres for residential use at HHDR density (up to 25 du/acre) to help meet Lower Income RHNA needs. Zoning Ordinance amendments shall be amended within 3 years of the October 15, 2021 beginning of the 5th Cycle planning period.
▪ HE 1.1.2. Housing Authority Coordination. Coordinate with the Riverside County Housing Authority to pursue grant funding and other incentives to promote and assist the nonprofit and/or private production of housing affordable to lower income households. Utilize public financing tools when available, including revenue bonds, Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), HOME, and Low- Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) program funds.
▪ HE 1.1.3. Mobile Homeowner Assistance. As resources allow, use federal and state grant funds, when available, to assist seniors, veterans and other lower income households purchase and/or improve mobile homes. ▪ HE 1.1.4. Affordable Housing Incentives. Consider establishing incentives for developers of new housing that is affordable to lower income households and special needs groups, such as: fast track/priority application and permit processing, density bonuses and/or fee waivers, assist affordable housing developers with rightof-way acquisition, off-site infrastructure improvements and other development costs, and assist in securing federal or state housing financing resources. Incentives should be considered for new housing developments of 100 or more units in which at least 15% of total units are sold or rented at prices affordable to households with incomes below 80% of the Riverside County Area Median Income (AMI).
▪ HE 1.1.5 Employee Housing Act Ordinance. Update the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code to include provisions for work force housing/ employee housing to ensure consistency with state law, including all requirements for the Employee Housing Act
▪ HE 1.1.6 Affordable Housing Development Review. Develop SB35 expedited review process guide and qualification checklist for the development of affordable housing units in the City for developers.
▪ HE 1.1.7 Accessory Dwelling Units. Develop ADU informational materials and 'as built' sample plans to promote the development of ADUs in the City and monitor the development of ADU’s annually to meet the minimum of the ADU assumption.
▪ HE 1.1.8. Density Provisions. Update the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code and General Plan density provisions to ensure consistency with government codes, including minimum density requirements and density bonuses, as required by state law, to encourage production of smaller, affordable housing, particularly in Town Centers and in higher density, mixed-use and other areas where appropriate and compatible with adjacent development.
▪ HE 1.1.9. Affordable Housing In-Lieu Fees. Establish a City affordable housing fund and affordable housing in-lieu fee program. Work with private housing developers to include affordable units and/or make in-lieu contribution to City’s affordable housing fund.
▪ HE 1.1.10. City Development Fees. Develop a sliding scale fee assistance program where the amount and type of City development fees may be waived City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
79 Goals Policy
by the City Council based on the number of affordable units proposed (i.e., as the number of affordable units increases, the amount of fee waiver increases). ▪ HE 1.1.11. Assistance Programs. Create programs and grant application program to provide the CDBG funds obtained by the City to the community for neighborhood development.
▪ HE 1.1.12. Site Identification. Work with public, private and nonprofit housing entities to identify candidate sites for new construction of rental housing for seniors and other special housing needs, and take all actions necessary to expedite processing and approval of qualified projects determined by the City. ▪ HE 1.1.13. Updated Land Use Inventory and Map. Establish and maintain a Land Use Inventory and a map that provide a mechanism to monitor a) acreage and location by General Plan designation, b) vacant and underutilized land, and c) build-out of approved projects utilizing the City’s GIS system and supported by mapping. Maintain the Land Use Inventory on a regular basis, as frequently as budget allows.
▪ HE 1.1.14. Candidate Sites Mapping. Collaborate with developers to identify vacant and underutilized properties as candidate sites for affordable or mixed market rate/affordable housing development and identify them in the Land Use Inventory.
▪ HE 1.1.15. Homeless Shelter. In cooperation with nonprofit organizations, adjacent cities, and with Riverside County, encourage the development of a homeless shelter to meet Jurupa Valley’s and adjacent communities’ homeless shelter needs.
▪ HE 1.1.16. Homelessness Strategy. Until a permanent shelter or shelters can be established within the City, the City shall work with Riverside County and local housing agencies to help prepare a homelessness strategy to address immediate needs dealing with safety, health and sanitation, environmental health, temporary housing, and access to homeless services.
▪ HE 1.1.17. Creative Housing Solutions. Provide incentives to encourage development of a range of creative and affordable housing types to accommodate homeless persons, seniors, disabled persons, and other low and extremely low-income populations, such as single room occupancy dwellings (SROs), pre-fabricated housing, so-called “tiny houses,” and other emerging housing products. Potential incentives include priority permit processing, fee waivers or deferrals, flexible development standards, supporting or assisting with funding applications, and coordinating with housing developers. ▪ HE 1.1.18. Coordination with Non-Profit Housing Providers. Continue to work with non-profit organizations, such as National Community Renaissance, Mary Erickson Housing, and Habitat for Humanity, in the production of affordable and self-help housing for all special needs groups.
▪ HE 1.1.19. Flexible Standards. Continue to provide for flexibility in the design of residential development through the processing of planned unit developments (PUDs), area and specific plans, and town center plans, and through the application of Zoning Ordinance provisions allowing flexible lot sizes and development standards.
▪ HE 1.1.20 Inclusionary housing Ordinance. Study the feasibility of adopting an Inclusionary Housing Ordinance.
▪ HE 1.1.21. Mixed Housing Types and Densities. Continue to work with residential developers to develop a range of housing types and densities for all income levels, including affordable housing, using creative planning concepts such as traditional neighborhood design, small lot subdivisions, planned unit developments, area and specific plans, and mixed-use development.

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
80 Goals Policy
▪ HE 1.1.22 Lanterman Act Ordinance. Update the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code disability accessibility provisions to ensure consistency with state law, including all requirements for the Lanterman Act.
▪ HE 1.1.23. Affordable Housing for Disabled Persons. Apply for grant money and as budget allows, help support programs providing increased opportunities for disabled persons in affordable residential units rehabilitated or constructed through City or County programs.
▪ HE 1.1.24 Code and Fee Transparency. Regularly review and update the City’s website and other materials to ensure that planning and development processes, regulations and fees are readily accessible and transparent. ▪ HE 1.1.25 Transitional, Temporary and Permanent Supportive Housing, and Low Barrier Navigation Centers. Review and update the City’s Zoning Code to ensure that transitional, temporary and permanent supportive housing and low barrier navigation centers are allowed by-right in zones allowing similar types of residential development as required by state law.
▪ HE 1.1.26 Development within Density Range. Encourage development at the upper limits of the allowable General Plan density range to increase housing choice in the City. Requests for densities below the allowable density range should generally be discouraged except where environmental constraints or other factors limit the development potential of a site.

Goal HE 2:

Conserve and improve the housing
stock, particularly housing affordable to
lower income and special housing needs
households.

▪ HE 2.1.1. Adaptive Housing Strategies. Develop program to assist in creative strategies for the rehabilitation and adaptive reuse of residential, commercial, and industrial structures for housing, if appropriate.
▪ HE 2.1.2. Code Enforcement. Ensure that housing is maintained through code enforcement activities. Continue to administer the Code Enforcement Program to eliminate unsafe, illegal, and substandard conditions in residential neighborhoods and residential properties. HE 2.3 Public Housing. Encourage the Riverside County Housing Authority to pursue federal and state funds to modernize public housing affordable to very low and low-income households. ▪ HE 2.1.3. Affordable Mobile Homes Conservation. Conserve affordable mobile home housing stock and help bring such housing up to code through mobile home loan and improvement grants funded by CDBG and other funds, as available.
▪ HE 2.1.4. Affordable Homes Conservation. Conserve affordable housing stock and help bring such housing up to code through and improvement grants funded by CDBG and other funds, as available.
▪ HE 2.1.5. Bilingual Outreach. As resources allow, provide bilingual outreach materials and activities to educate and inform the community about available housing rehabilitation programs and resources.
▪ HE 2.1.6. Monitor Assisted Units. Help ensure that affordable housing assisted with public funds remains affordable for the required time through maintenance of an inventory of assisted units which is monitored for expiration of assisted housing.
▪ HE 2.1.7. Preserve At-Risk Housing Units. Preserve grantassisted, bond- financed, density bonus or other types of affordable units at risk of conversion to market rate during the planning period by working with the Riverside County Housing Authority or other nonprofit housing entities to 1) purchase the units using state, federal or local financing and/or subsidies, 2) assist with low or no interest loans for rehabilitation, as budget allows, 3) support bond refinancing, and 4) refer the project sponsor to other federal or local sources of below- City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
81 Goals Policy
market financing. City shall also ensure compliance with state noticing and tenant education requirements.
▪ HE 2.1.8 Affordability Covenants. As a condition of project approval, require new affordable housing projects to remain affordable for a specific time, consistent with and as required by the funding program(s) in which they participate, through covenants with the project proponent, Housing Authority or other housing agency.
▪ HE 2.1.9 Remove Government Constraints. Evaluate the zoning ordinance, subdivision requirements, and other City regulations to remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing, where appropriate and legally possible. Evaluate and revise as appropriate the City’s density requirements for the Highest Density Residential land use designation (HHDR) to address constraints for housing development including impacts on feasibility of proposals.

Goal HE 3:

Promote equal housing opportunities for
all persons.
▪ HE 3.1.1. Fair Housing Council. Utilize the services of the Fair Housing Council of Riverside County to implement a number of programs, including: 1) audits of lending institutions and rental establishments, 2) education and training of City staff, and 3) fair housing outreach and education regarding fair housing laws and resources.
▪ HE 3.1.2. Education and Outreach. Continue to use the services of the Fair Housing Council to provide education and outreach services to the public in both Spanish and English (also see HE 3.1.1 above).
▪ HE 3.1.3. Public Housing and Rental Assistance. Develop program to assist in creative strategies for the rehabilitation and adaptive reuse of residential, commercial, and industrial structures for housing, if appropriate. ▪ HE 3.1.4. First-Time Homebuyers Assistance. Explore the feasibility of developing a new First Time Home Buyer Down Payment Assistance Program, utilizing tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds to finance mortgages and down payment assistance for single-family homes for very low and low income first time homebuyers.
▪ HE 3.1.5 Multi-Family Dwellings Standards. Establish standards for multiple- family dwellings that will achieve comparable recreation and open space opportunities, protection from sources of noise and degraded air quality, adequate access to public services and facilities and parking. ▪ HE 3.1.6. Fair Housing Council. Collaborate with the Fair Housing Council of Riverside County to continue to provide services to the community and accept requests, complaints and assistance for fair housing needs. ▪ HE 3.1.7 Reasonable Accommodations. Establish a written procedure for providing reasonable accommodations in zoning code and land use.

Goal HE 4:

Maintain and enhance residential
neighborhoods and remove blight.
▪ HE 4.1.1. Neighborhood Participation. Implement varied strategies to ensure residents are aware of and able to participate in planning decisions affecting their neighborhoods early in the planning process, such as neighborhood meetings, City Council member visits, and town hall meetings. ▪ HE 4.1.2. Neighborhood Needs. Identify specific neighborhood needs, problems, trends, and opportunities for improvements. Work directly with neighborhood groups and individuals to address concerns.
▪ HE 4.1.3. Neighborhood Improvements . As budget allows, help fund neighborhood improvements, such as street paving or repairs, sidewalks, pedestrian and equestrian trails, crosswalks, parkways, street trees and other public facilities to improve aesthetics, safety, and accessibility.

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
82 Goals Policy
▪ HE 4.1.4. Neighborhood Pride . Working with Riverside County, CSDs and nonprofit housing entities, develop and promote a Neighborhood Pride Program including cooperative projects with Code Enforcement staff, and Public Works projects in target areas, as funding allows.

Goal HE 5:

Reduce residential energy and water use.
▪ HE 5.1.1. Incentives. Consider establishing incentives for energy conservation above and beyond the requirements of Title 24, such as priority permit processing or reduced permit fees on a sliding scale Fee Assistance Program, as budget allows.
▪ HE 5.1.2. Energy Programs for Lower Income Households . Encourage and participate in Riverside County’s and utility providers’ programs to reduce maintenance and energy costs for households with low incomes, and increase efforts to inform the public about available cost -saving, energy conservation programs.
▪ HE 5.1.3. Energy Conservation Grants. Pursue grant funds for energy rehab costs and consumer education.
▪ HE 5.1.4. City Requests for Proposals . City RFPs, contracts, and bidding procedures capital projects and programs shall incorporate energy conservation and sustainability measures.
▪ HE 5.1.5. Sustainable Desi gn. Adopt sustainable design policies, standards and codes that result in attractive, energy efficient, neighborhoods.

Source: City of Jurupa Valley Housing Element 2021-29, Certified by HCD on April 22, 2022

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
83 Residential Development Review Process and Fees
Development Review Process
The City’s development review process is designed to accommodate housing development applications of various levels of complexity and requiring different entitlements. Processing times vary with the complexity of the project. Currently, state law requires specific review times and project completion for certain types of ministerial housing related applications. These laws streamline the time and review process each project can go through, but the timelines still depend on the type of housing and size of the overall development and total units proposed.

California Government Code §659401(a)(1) requires that every city or county make all information regarding development processing applications, regulations, and fees readily available to all applicants for development projects and any person requesting the information. The City of Jurupa Valley provides information its development processes, regulations, and fees available on its website. The City is reviewing the web site to ensure that all processes, regulations, and fees are provided on the website and are easy to navigate to, and that systems are in place to regularly update and maintain the information.

Processing times vary with the complexity of the project. Buil ding permit applications for new single-family houses typically take 3 to 6 months to complete the building permit plan check process, sometimes longer depending upon the size of the project. Processing multi -family development applications, which often re quire general plan amendments, rezoning, and CEQA review, typically requires 6 months to 1 year—depending upon the number of units—to complete discretionary planning review. The City's permit procedures expedite planning and building approvals where possib le and are not likely to unduly constrain housing development. The following discussion describes in detail the City’s administrative development review procedures (such as Site Development Plan Review) as well as discretionary review and approval processes.

Pre-Application Review. Prospective applicants are encouraged to meet with a City Planner prior to submitting an application to help expedite the development process. Applicants may also request a more detailed, formal pre-application review. This type of review can be helpful for large or more complex projects, and when the applicant desires review by multiple City departments, such as Engineering, Building, and Public Works. Pre -Application Review requires submittal of an application, fee, plans, and background information and can take from 3 to 5 five weeks to process.

Following submittal, the application is routed to all City d epartments and outside agencies that would review the formal entitlement application. For example, a Tentative Tract Map would be transmitted to utility companies (e.g., Southern California Edison, SoCal Gas), special districts (JCSD/RCSD/ JARPD) and the County of Riverside.

Site Development Permit (SDP). The City of Jurupa Valley currently requires a Site Development Permit for all multi -family residential projects . Site Development Permits (SDPs), at a minimum, require submittal of an application, fee, c hecklist, site plan and other exhibits, and supporting City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
84 information to the Planning Department. Minor Site Development Permits, such as for accessory structures, are exempt from environmental review and can be acted upon by the Planning Director without a p ublic hearing. SDPs requiring environmental review under CEQA require a public hearing held by the Planning Director. All SDPs require written notice to owners of property located within at least 300 feet of the proposed project boundaries. The time for pr ocessing an SDP varies with the complexity of the proposal. However, the review process for a minor SDP that is exempt from CEQA can usually be accomplished within 90 to 120 days. Overall, the SDP process provides a streamlined, discretionary review proces s that allows most residential development projects to be evaluated for compliance with General Plan and Zoning Ordinance standards.

Conditional Use Permits (CUP). A CUP is required for certain limited residential uses that are conditionally permitted in non-residential districts (e.g., General Commercial “C -1/C-P” zone district), such as congregate care residential facilities. Typically, the Planning Commission reviews and takes final action on CUPs, and appeals are considered by the City Council, who wo uld then take final action on the matter. Conditions of approval may include, but are not limited to, hours of operation, duration, site improvements (e.g., access, parking, landscaping, fencing, signage), off-site improvements (e.g., trails, frontage improvements, street trees), and architectural design.

The City’s CUP process typically allows the Planning Commission to consider conditional uses within approximately 90 to 150 days.

In 2020, the City adopted objective multifamily residential development sta ndards (MMC

92.40.545) to facilitate the ministerial review of multifamily housing projects that reserve a minimum of 10% of the units affordable to lower income households. As of the preparation of this document, the City is in the process of formalizing the process through the preparation of an application and other procedures. Applicants for affordable multi -family projects that conform with underlying general plan and zoning designations need only to submit for building permits.

Applications are routed to the Community Development Department to determine conformance with the City’s objective multifamily development standards. Staff works with applicants directly on any minor design changes needed to ensure conformance thus allowing projects to remain in an expedited ministerial building permit review process. This process eliminates the need for a discretionary Site Development Permit and CEQA for affordable housing projects, but still requires impact studies where site conditions warrant them.

The City’s multifamily residential design standards were prepared to be objective and not subject to varying interpretations or opinions in accordance with State law. A recent review conducted with the preparation of the City’s Housing Element confirmed their objectivity. For instance, most of the standards are numerically based and require a minimum size such as requiring washer and dryer hook-ups in each dwelling unit (or garage) for projects of eight units or more. Others provide clear direction on requirements and are not subject to interpretation. As of 2021, the City has also been working with an affordable housing developer to relax some of the multifamily development standards to be more conducive to affordable housing development. The Planning Commission and City Council are considering changes to the standards including reduced setbacks from industrial, commercial, and institutional uses; reduced landscape buffer requirements, more flexibility with building articulation, removal of
City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
85 Summary. Jurupa Valley’s processing and permit procedures are consistent with state planning and zoning law and are not considered to be an unreasonable constraint on the cost or supply of housing. The City amended the Zoning Code to eliminate the requirement for discretionary review for multi -family development in multi -family residential zones to better facilitate permit processing for projects that conform to the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance development standards.

Planning and Development Fees
The City of Jurupa Valley relies upon various planning and development fees to recoup costs and ensure that essential services and infrastructure are available when needed. These fees are passed on to the homebuyer or renter, therefore increasing the local cost of housing. Planning fees for Jurupa Valley are summarized in Table 4-6.

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
86 Table 4-6
City of Jurupa Valley Planning Fees

Application Initial Deposit Fee
General Plan Amendment $7,479.66
Conditional Use Permit $9,646.14 + $5.10 per lot or site Variance (filed alone) $2,625.48
Site Development Permit (Plot Plan) $4,791.96
Tentative Tract Map (Single-Family Residential) $11,368.92 + $102.00 per lot Tentative Tract Map (Multi-Family Residential) $11,368.92 + $102.00 per lot + $19.38 per acre Tentative Parcel Map (without waiver of Final
Parcel Map)
$5,621.22 + $104.04 per lot
Zone Change $3,648.54
Accessory Dwelling Unit $550
Source: City of Jurupa Valley Housing Element 2021-29, Certified by HCD on April 22, 2022

In addition to planning fees, the City of Jurupa Valley collects development impact fees from developers of new housing units, as well as commercial, office, retail, and industrial development.

These fees are used to offset costs primarily associated with traffic impacts and City street improvements. Table 4-7 summarizes the development impact fees required by the City and by other relevant agencies in 2019 for residential developments. Like all cities, Jurupa Valley abides by state law with respect to fees and exactions. Although impact fees and requirements for offsite improvements add to the cost of housing, these fees and requirements are necessary to maintain the quality of life within a community.

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
87 Table 4-7
Residential Development Impact Fees (Per Unit)

Fee Type
Area 1: Jurupa
Single-Family Multi-Family
Public Facilities Fee $1,207 $1,011
Fire Facilities Fee $705 $590
Transportation (Roads, Bridges)
Fee $1,001 $791
Transportation (Signals) Fee $420 $378
Regional Parks $563 $472
Regional Trails Fee $316 $264
Libraries Fee $341 $286
Program Administration Fee $60 $50
Transportation Uniform
Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Single-Family $8,873 Multi-Family $6,231 Western Riverside County
Multiple Species Habitat
Conservation Plan (MSHCP) Fee
Less than 8.0 units per acre: $1,952/unit
Between 8.0-14.0 units per acre: $1,250/unit
Greater than 14.0 units per acre: $1,015/unit
Mira Loma Road and Bridge
Benefit District (RBBD) Fee
Zone A:
$1,667
MF: $417
Zone B:
$884
MF: $612
Zone D:
$2,681
MF: $1,857
Zone E:
$1,644
MF: $1,139
Notes: Fees for senior single-family units are reduced by 33%.

Source: City of Jurupa Valley, Reassessed in 2021

Community Representation and Participation
An important strategy for expanding housing choices for all residents is to ensure that residents’ concerns are heard. A jurisdiction must create avenues through which residents can voice concerns and participate in the decision -making process. The City values citizen input and has established a City Council and a Planning Commission with representation from the community.

In addition, the community participated in the preparation of this Fair Housing Assessment (AI) through various workshops and an online fair housing survey. The public outreach program for the AI is outlined in the City of Jurupa Valley Citizen Participat ion Plan and discussed in the Introduction (Chapter 1) of this AI.

City Council
City residents elect the City Council to guide the policy affairs of the community. The City Council must provide an environment that stimulates participation in the governin g processes and must City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
88 conduct the affairs of the City openly and responsively. Jurupa Valley is a General Law City that is governed by a five-member City Council. Members of the City Council are elected by -district for a four-year term. Each year, the City Council selects one of its members to serve as Mayor and one member to serve as Mayor Pro Tem. The Mayor presides over all Council meetings and is the ceremonial head of the City for official functions.

Planning Commission
The Jurupa Valley City Planni ng Commission guides the City’s planning processes. The Planning Commission is composed of five citizens, appointed by the City Council, who help plan for the City’s growth, economic vitality and environmental quality. The Commission reviews and makes final decisions on many types of planning applications, such as land use permits, subdivisions and environmental review. The Commission also makes recommendations to the City Council on planning applications that require Council approval. In addition, the Co mmission advises the Council on long-range planning matters, such as zoning and the General Plan.

Community Development Advisory Committee
The Community Development Advisory Committee is responsible for reviewing applications for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding, receiving testimony from CDBG applicants, and providing the City Council with recommendations regarding the allocation of CDBG funding.

The Council-appointed Committee consists of five members serving for a term of four years, and meets on an as-needed basis.

In order to avoid potential conflicts of interest, Committee members cannot serve in any capacity on any board, committee, or commission of any public agency or district , and cannot have any decision-making authority in a community organization that applies for or receives funds through the CDBG program.

Traffic Safety Committee
The Traffic Safety Committee consists of five members, of which two are citizens appointed by the City Council. The committee’s duties include: (1) a ssure consideration of common input, community values, and goals; (2) enable problem solving in a group setting; (3) provide a 'sounding board' for traffic related requests ; (4) r eceive appropriate complaints having to do with traffic matters; (5) recommend to the City Council ways and means for improving traffic conditions; and (6) stimulate and assist in the preparation and publication of selected traffic reports.

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
89 5. Fair Housing Practices
This section provides an overview of the institutional structure of the housing industry with regard to fair housing practices. In addition, this section discusses the fair housing services available to residents, as well as the nature and extent of fair housing complaints received by the City.

Typically, fair housing services encompass the investigation and resolution of housing discrimination complaints, discrimination auditing/testing, and education and outreach, including the dissemination of fair housing information. Tenant/landlord counse ling services are usually offered by fair housing service providers but are not considered fair housing.

Fair Housing Practices in the Homeownership Market
On December 5, 1996, HUD and the National Association of Realtors (NAR) entered into a Fair Housing Partnership. Article VII of the HUD/NAR Fair Housing Partnership Resolution provides that HUD and the NAR develop a Model of Affirmative Fair Housing Marketing Plan for use by members of the NAR to satisfy HUD’s Affirmative Fair Housing Marketing regulat ions. Even so, discrimination still occurs in the housing market.

Homeownership Process
One of the main challenges in owning a home versus renting a home is the process. Buying a house takes considerably more time and effort than finding a home to rent. The major legal and financial implications surrounding the process also intimidate potential buyers. People can be overwhelmed by the unique terminology, the number of steps required and the financial considerations involved. The process is costly and fa ir housing issues could surface at any time during this process.

Advertising
The first thing a potential buyer is likely to do when evaluating a home purchase, is search advertisements either in magazines, newspapers or the Internet to get a feel for what the market offers. Language in advertising is sometimes an issue within the realm of real estate.

Advertisements cannot include discriminatory references such as the use of words describing current or potential residents or the neighbors or the neigh borhood in racial or ethnic terms.

Some commonly used statements that are discriminatory include the following:
▪ Adults preferred
▪ Perfect for empty nesters
▪ Conveniently located by a particular church
City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
90 ▪ Ideal for married couples without kids
Even the use of models in ads has been questioned, based on the idea that it appears to appeal to a certain race. In addition, selecting media or locations for advertising that deny information on listings to certain segments of the housing market could also be considered discriminatory. Even if an agent does not intend to discriminate in an ad, it would still be considered a violation to suggest to a reader whether a protected class is preferred. In cities such as Jurupa Valley, where there is a substanti al Hispanic pop ulation ( 72 percent, City of Jurupa Valley 20 24 AI), the homeownership process offers opportunities for fair housing violations to arise due to the natural tendency to advertise in a specific language such as Spanish. Although the advertisements might not violate fair housing laws, these advertisements could limit opportunities for other racial/ethnic groups to find housing. Although the homeownership process is outside the jurisdiction of the City, recent litigation has set precedence for violations in a dvertisements that hold publishers, newspapers, the Multiple Listing Service, real estate agents and brokers accountable for discriminatory ads. As a reminder to choose words carefully, the Multiple Listing Service now prompts a fair housing message when a new listing is being added.

Lending
Initially, buyers must find a lender that will qualify them for a loan. This part of the process entails an application, a credit check, an analysis of ability to repay and the amount for which one is eligible, choosing the type and terms of the loan, etc. Applicants are requested to provide a lot of sensitive information including their gender, ethnicity, income level, age and familial status. Most of this information is used for reporting purposes required of lenders by the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) and the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA), however, there is no guarantee that individual loan officers or underwriters will not misuse the information. A report on mortgage lending discrimination by the Urban La nd Institute 6 outlines four basic stages in which discrimination can occur:
▪ Advertising and outreach
▪ Pre-application inquiries
▪ Loan approval/denial and terms/conditions
▪ Loan administration
A number of different individuals take part in the various stages of this process and any of them could potentially discriminate. Further areas of potential discrimination include differences in the level of encouragement, financial assistance, types of loans recommended, amount of down payment required and level of customer service provided.

6 Turner, M.A., & Skidmore, F. (Eds.). (1999, June). Mortgage Lending Discrimination: A Review of Existing Evidence.

Washington, DC: Urban Institute.

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
91 Real Estate Agents
Finding a realtor is normally the next step, which can be done by looking in newspapers, searching the Internet or primarily through referrals. The agent will find the home that fits a buyer’s needs, desires and budget based on the amount for which the buyer is qualified by the lending institution.

Realtors might act as agents of discrimination by unintentionally or even intentionally steering potential buyers to or from a particular neighborhood. In Jurupa Valley, with a large Hispanic population, a real estate agent might assume that a non -Hispanic buyer would not be interested in living in a primarily Hispanic community or might assume that Hispanic buyers would prefer living in a Hispanic community. This situation could also apply to other protected classes who can be steered away from certain areas on the presumption that they might not want to live there based on the existing demographic makeup of the neighborhood.

Agents might also discriminate by who they agree to represent, who they turn away and the comments they make about their clients. However, the California Association of Realtors (CAR) has included language on many of its forms disclosing fair housing laws to those involved.

The Inland Valley Association of Realtors (IVAR) highlight the Fair Housing Act by continuously addressing discrimination in their professional activities. They support programs that educate the public about the right to equal housing opportunities. IVAR helps prohibit discrimination in housing by swearing to uphold the National Association of Realtors (NAR) Code of Ethics. The Code commits all Realtors to providing equal professional services without discrimination.

Per their bylaws - all members of IVAR have a significant focus on the buying and selling of property without discriminatory practices – adhering to all Federal, State and other local laws . The Association outlines ways to meet code of ethics training required by NAR.

Appraisals
Banks order appraisal reports to determine whether a property is worth the amount of the loan requested. Generally speaking, appraisals are based on the comparable sales of properties surrounding the neighborhood of the property being appraised. Other factors are tak en into consideration, such as the age of the structure, any improvements made and location. Some neighborhoods with higher concentrations of minorities may appraise lower than like properties in neighborhoods with lower concentrations. Unfortunately, th is practice is geared toward a neighborhood and not an applicant and therefore is not a direct violation of fair housing law that can easily be addressed. One effect of this practice, however, is that it tends to keep property values lower in a given neig hborhood, thereby restricting the amount of equity and capital available to those residents. Individual appraisers are the ones making the decisions on the amounts, thus there is room for flexibility in the numbers. As appraisers are individually licensed, similar to real estate agents, they risk losing their license for unfair practices.

Sellers
City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
92 A seller might not want to sell his/her house to certain purchasers based on classification biases protected by fair housing laws, or they may want to accept offe rs only from a preferred group.

Often, sellers are home when agents show the properties to potential buyers and may develop certain biases based on this contact. Sellers must sign the Residential Listing Agreement and Seller’s Advisory forms, which disclose that a seller understands fair housing laws and practices of nondiscrimination. Yet enforcement is difficult because a seller may have multiple offers and choose one based on a bias.

Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions
Covenants, Conditions and Rest rictions (CC&Rs) in the past were used to exclude certain groups such as minorities from equal access to housing in a community. Today, the California Department of Real Estate reviews CC&Rs for all subdivisions of five or more lots, or condominiums of fi ve or more units. This review is authorized by the Subdivided Lands Act and mandated by the Business Professions Code, Section 11000. The review includes a wide range of issues, including compliance with fair housing law. The review must be completed an d approved before the Department of Real Estate will issue a final subdivision public report. This report is required before a real estate broker or anyone else can sell the units, and each prospective buyer must be issued a copy of the report. If the CC& Rs are not approved, the Department of Real Estate will issue a “deficiency notice,” requiring the CC&Rs to be revised.

Communities with old subdivisions or condominium developments may still contain CC&Rs that do not comply with the fair housing laws. A typical example relates to occupancy standards, which an association may seek to enforce in order to oust a particular group or discriminate based on familial status or lack thereof. However, provisions in the CC&Rs that violate the fair housing laws are not enforceable by the homeowners association.7
Insurance
Insurance agents are provided with underwriting guidelines for the companies they work for to determine whether a company will sell insurance to a particular applicant. Currently, underwriting guidelines are not public information, however, consumers have begun to seek access to these underwriting guidelines in order to learn if certain companies have discriminatory policies. Some states are being more responsive than others to this demand and have recently begun to require that companies file their underwriting guidelines with the state department of insurance, which would then make the information public.

Many insurance companies have applied strict guidelines, such as not insurin g older homes, that disproportionately affect lower-income and minority families that can only afford to buy in older

7In 1985, the Davis-Sterling Common Interest Development Act (Civil Code § 1353-1378) was passed by the State of California.

The Davis -Sterling Act contains all laws pertaining to Common Interest Developments (CIDs) and requires all CIDs to be managed by an association. Developers are required to create CC&Rs and bylaws, which are the governing documents that dictate how the association operates and what rules the owners —and their tenants and guests —must obey. The CC&Rs are legally enforceable by the association and individual owners, and nothing in the CC&Rs can take precedence over federal, state or local laws.

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
93 neighborhoods. A California Department of Insurance (CDI) survey found that less than one percent of homeowners insurance available in Ca lifornia is currently offered free from tight restrictions.8 CDI has also found that many urban areas are underserved by insurance agencies.

The California Organized Investment Network (COIN) is a collaboration of the California Department of Insurance, t he insurance industry, community economic development organizations and community advocates. This collaboration was formed in 1996 at the request of the insurance industry as an alternative to state legislation that would have required insurance companies to invest in underserved communities, similar to the federal Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) that applies to the banking industry. COIN is a voluntary program that facilitates insurance industry investments to provide profitable returns to investors and economic and social benefits to underserved communities.

The California Fair Access to Insurance Requirements (FAIR) Plan was created by the legislature in 1968 after the brush fires and riots of the 1960s made it difficult for some people to purchase fire insurance due to hazards beyond their control. The FAIR Plan is designed to make property insurance more readily available to people who have difficulty obtaining it from private insurers because their property is considered “high risk.”
Credit and FICO Scores
Credit history is one of the most important factors in obtaining a home purchase loan. Credit scores determine loan approval, interest rates associated with the loan and the type of loan an applicant will be given. Applicants with high credit scores are generally given conventional loans, whereas those with lower and moderate range scores often use government -backed loans or subprime loans. Applicants with lower scores also receive higher interest rates on the loans as a result of being perceived as a higher risk to the lender and may even be required to pay points depending on the type of lending institution used.

Fair Isaac and Company (FICO), which is the company used by the Experian (formerly TRW) credit bureau to calculate credit scores, has set the standard for the scoring of credit history. TransUnion and Equifax are two other credit bureaus that also provide credit scores, though they are typically used to a lesser degree.

In short, points are awarded or deducted based on certain items such as how long one has had credit cards, whether one makes payments on time and if credit balances are near the maximum.

Typically, the scores range from the 300s to around 850, with higher scores demonstrating lower risk. Lower credit scores re quire a more thorough review than higher scores, and mortgage lenders will often not even consider a score below 600.

8Homeowners Premium Survey . (2010, February 8). California Department of Insurance. Section 12959 of the California Insurance Code requires the commissioner to publish and distribute a comparison of insurance rates report for those lines of insurance that are of most interest to individual purchasers of personal lines of coverage.

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
94 FICO scores became more heavily relied on by lenders when studies showed that borrowers with scores above 680 almost always make payments on time, whereas borrowers with scores below 600 seemed fairly certain to develop problems. Credit scores also made it easier to develop computer programs (electronic underwriting) that can make a “yes” decision for loans that should obviously be approved. Some of the factors that affect a FICO score are as follows:
▪ Delinquencies
▪ New accounts (opened within the last 12 months)
▪ Length of credit history (a longer history of established credit is better than a short history) ▪ Balances on revolving credit accounts
▪ Public records, such as tax liens, judgments or bankruptcies ▪ Credit card balances
▪ Number of inquiries
▪ Number and types of revolving accounts
National Association of Realtors
Since 1996, the National Association of Realtors (NAR) has maintained a Fair Housing Partnership with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). As part of this partnership, HUD and NAR have developed a Model Affirmative Fair Housing Action Plan for use by members of NAR to satisfy HUD’s Affirmative Fair Housing Mar keting regulations. Through this Plan, NAR offers a full spectrum of fair housing resources and training to member realtors. The term Realtor identifies a licensed professional in real estate who is a member of the NAR, however, not all licensed real estate brokers and salespersons are members of the NAR.

Code of Ethics. Article 10 of the NAR Code of Ethics provides that “Realtors shall not deny equal professional services to any person for reasons of race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin. Realtors shall not be a party to any plan or agreement to discriminate against any person or persons on the basis of ra ce, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin.” A Realtor pledges to conduct business in keeping with the spirit and letter of the Code of Ethics. Article 10 imposes obligations on realtors and is a firm statement of support for equal opportunity in housing. A realtor who suspects discrimination is instructed to call the local Board of Realtors. Local Boards of Realtors will accept complaints alleging violations of the Code of Ethics filed by a home seeker who alleges discrimin atory treatment in the availability, purchase or rental of housing. Local Boards of Realtors have a responsibility to enforce the Code of Ethics through professional standards, procedures and corrective action in cases where a violation of the Code of Ethics is proven to have occurred.

In addition, Standard of Practice Article 10 -1 states that “REALTORS ® shall not volunteer information regarding the racial, religious, or ethnic composition of any neighborhood and shall not engage in any activity which may result in panic selling. REALTORS® shall not print, display, or circulate any statement or advertisement with respect to the selling or renting of a property that City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
95 indicates any preference, limitations, or discrimination based on race, color, religion, se x, handicap, familial status, or national origin.”
Realtor Fair Housing Declaration. In accordance with the Code of Ethics, each Realtor signs the following pledge, developed in 1996 as a result of the HUD-NAR agreement.

The Realtor agrees to:
▪ Provide equal professional service without regard to race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin of any prospective client, customer, or of the residents of any community.
▪ Keep informed about fair housing law and practices, im proving clients’ and customers’ opportunities and his/her business.
▪ Develop advertising that indicates that everyone is welcome and no one is excluded, expanding his/her client’s and customer’s opportunities to see, buy or lease property. ▪ Inform clients and customers about their rights and responsibilities under the Fair Housing Laws by providing brochures and other information.
▪ Document efforts to provide professional service, which will assist him/her in becoming a more responsive and successful Realtor.
▪ Refuse to tolerate non-compliance.
▪ Learn about those who are different and celebrate those differences. ▪ Take a positive approach to fair housing practices and aspire to follow the spirit, as well as the letter, of the law.
▪ Develop and implement fair housing practices for his/her firm to carry out the spirit of this declaration.

Certification Program. In addition to the Code of Ethics, NAR certifies real estate professionals who receive specialized training to work with a diverse population. The “At H ome with Diversity:

One America” certification program provides planning tools for reaching out and marketing to a diverse housing market in the areas of diversity awareness, building cross-cultural skills, and developing a diversity business plan. Realtor s completing the course can display the HUD One America logo and NAR at Home With Diversity logo in their advertising, signaling to prospective buyers that the realtor is knowledgeable about working with diverse populations. Other NAR training tools include brochures for existing and prospective homebuyers on “How to Avoid Predatory Lending” and “Learn How to Avoid Foreclosure and Keep Your Home.”

California Association of Realtors (CAR)
The California Association of Realtors (CAR) is an arm of NAR, and represents nearly 170,000 realtors statewide. Members are required to adhere to the NAR Code of Ethics and sign the Fair City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
96 Housing Pledge. Jurupa Valley realtors are served by CAR’s Los Angeles office, and have access to numerous services and programs including legislative advocacy, legal programs, and educational training. CAR offers a variety of professional development courses, including training realtors in working with foreclosed properties.

CAR has developed diversity -related initiatives that now serve as models for associations across the country. These include:
▪ WomanUP! - Even though the real estate industry is predominantly female, women are underrepresented in leadership positions at both the brokerage and senior management levels. The goal of C.A.R.’s Women’s Initiative is to create a community where mentors and leaders can communicate, collaborate, advocate for, and support one another. ▪ Latino Initiative Voices in Action – A program provides information and resources to members; it includes materials on home buying and fraud prevention. Resources include survey research on Latino renters and their views on homeownership and a research paper on homeownership and inequality.
▪ Support of NAR programs – The CAR website includes information on NAR's At Home With Diversity course as well as available funding for diversity programs.

Inland Valley Association of Realtors
Realtor Associations are generally the first line of contact for real estate agents who need continuing education courses, legal forms, career development and other daily work necessities.

The frequency and availability of courses varies among these associations, and local association membership is generally determined by the location of the broker for which an agent works.

The Inland Valley Association of Realtors (IVAR) is the local association that serves Jurupa Valley.

IVAR has offices in the cities of Riverside and Rancho Cucamonga. IVAR provides a variety of services, including helping to promote fair housing activitie s. The Association has a standing Grievance Committee whose function is to do a “paper review” of disciplinary complaints, to screen out frivolous complaints, to prevent abuse and harassment, and to assure complaints are properly framed. It does not review arbitration requests. Grievance Committee “paper review” is the first step in the Disciplinary Hearing process. Associations of REALTORS® only determine whether the Code of Ethics or association membership duties have been violated, not whether the law or real estate regulations have been broken. When broken laws or regulations are suspected or when the real estate professional is not a REALTOR®, referrals are made to the California Department of Real Estate (DRE).

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
97 California Department of Real Estate (DRE)
The California Department of Real Estate (DRE) is the licensing authority for real estate brokers and salespersons. As noted earlier, not all licensed brokers and salespersons are members of the national or California Association of Realtors. State real estate licenses are issued for a four-year period.

DRE has adopted education requirements that include courses in ethics and fair housing. To renew a real estate license, each licensee is required to complete 45 hours of continuing e ducation, including three hours in each of four mandated areas: Agency, Ethics, Trust Fund and Fair Housing.

The fair housing course contains information that will enable an agent to identify and avoid discriminatory practices when providing real estate services to clients.

On or after January 1, 1996, a real estate salesperson renewing his/her license for the fir st time must complete separate three -hour courses in Agency, Ethics, Trust Fund Handling and Fair Housing to qualify for renewal. All licensees , with the exception of those renewing for the first time, are required to complete a full 45 hours of continuing education for each license renewal.

For the initial renewal on or after January 1, 1996, the law requires, as part of the 45 hours of continuing education, completion of four mandatory three -hour courses in Agency, Ethics, Trust Fund Handling and Fair Housing. These licensees will also be required to complete a minimum of 18 additional hours of courses related to consumer protection. The remain ing hours required to fulfill the 45 hours of continuing education, may be related to either customer service or consumer protection, at the option of the licensee.

The DRE requires all licensees to provide proof of continuing education courses with the following two exceptions:

1. An applicant provides proof that he/she is 70 years of age or older.

2. An applicant provides proof that he/she has been licensed for 30 consecutive years.

DRE is responsible for investigation of written complaints received from the public and other real estate agents/brokerages regarding alleged violations of real estate law among licensed real estate brokers and salespersons. Complaints may involve fair housing issues. If DRE determines a violation has occurred, they have the authority to revoke the real estate license. Violations may result in civil injunctions, criminal prosecutions or fines.

Fair Housing Practices in the Rental Housing Market
Similar to the homeownership market, a major challenge to ensuring fair housing in the rental market is the complexity of the process. There are several stages in the process of renting a home or apartment: 1) the advertising and outreach stage, 2) pre -application inquiries and responses, 3) the criteria for acceptance, 4) the lease and 5) administration of the lease. This section discusses City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
98 these phases of the rental process. Although a potential homebuyer might face discriminatory practices primarily d uring the process of purchasing a home, a renter could confront housing discrimination not only during the process of renting but also throughout the tenancy.

The Apartment Rental Process
Although the process of renting an apartment may be less expensive and burdensome up -front than the home-buying process, it may still be just as time-consuming. Potential renters might still face discrimination during the various stages of the rental process.

Advertising. Like finding a home to purchase, the main sources of information are the classified advertisements in local newspapers, word of mouth, signs, apartment guides, the Internet and apartment brokers. The same types of discriminatory language previously described under the Homeownership Process may be used by landlords or apartment managers to exclude “undesirable elements.”
A particularly difficult situation to address is the development of small apartment c omplexes by property owners who may be new to the rental housing industry. Compliance with f air housing laws is difficult to monit or among the small property owners. Outreach to this group is also difficult because many of these owners may not belong to the Apartment Owners or Apartment Managers associations, or do not actively participate in ev ents/trainings offered by these associations. Advertising by small property owners may not always comply with the fair housing laws. For example, rental ads in local Spanish -language newspapers do not always appear in the English-language newspapers, as required by law.

Viewing the Unit. Viewing the unit is the most obvious place where potential renters could encounter discrimination because landlords or managers might discriminate based on race or disability, or judge on appearance whether a potential renter is reliable or might violate any of the rules. For example, there have been cases where a manager tried to deter a family by indicating strict occupancy standards or frowning on the presence of young children accompanying a viewer.

Furthermore, dis crimination against families with children and people with disabilities is even more prevalent than racial discrimination.

Credit/Income Check. Landlords may ask potential renters to provide credit references, lists of previous addresses and landlords, an d employment history/salary. The criteria for tenant selection, if any, are typically not known to those seeking to rent. Many landlords often use credit history as an excuse when trying to exclude certain groups. Recent legislation provides for applicants to receive a copy of the report used to evaluate applications. In addition, applicants may also request a copy of their credit report (for a fee) to verify that the information used to approve/deny their application is accurate.

Lease. Most apartments are rented under either a lease agreement or a month-to-month rental agreement. A lease is favorable from a tenant’s point of view for two reasons: the tenant is assured the right to live there for a specific period of time and the tenant has an established rent during that period. Most other provisions of a lease protect the landlord. Information written in City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
99 a lease or rental agreement includes the rental rate, required deposit, length of occupancy, apartment rules and termination requirements.

In a tight housing market, when a landlord can “financially afford” to choose tenants, the tendency is to offer shorter lease terms. In this case, a landlord might simply ask the “not -so-desirable” tenant to leave with a 60-day Notice to Vacate. Short-term leases also allow the landlord to raise rent more frequently.

Typically, the lease or rental agreement is a standard form completed for all units within the same building. However, the enforcement of the rules contained in the lease or agreement might not be sta ndard for all tenants. A landlord might act in a discriminatory way and choose strict enforcement of the rules for certain tenants based on arbitrary factors, such as race, presence of children or disability. Because of the recent escalation of housing pr ices throughout California, complaints regarding tenant harassment through strict enforcement of lease agreements as a means of evicting tenants have increased.

Security Deposit. A security deposit is typically required to rent a housing unit. To deter “less- than-desirable” tenants, a landlord might ask for a security deposit higher than usual. Tenants could also face differential treatment when vacating the units. The landlord might choose to return a smaller portion of the security deposit to some tenants, claiming excessive wear and tear.

A landlord might require that persons with disabilities with service animals pay an additional pet rent, a monthly surcharge for pets or a deposit, which is also a discriminatory act.9 During the Tenancy. During tenancy, the most common forms of discrimination a tenant could face are based on familial status, race, national origin, sex or disability. Usually, these types of discrimination appear in differential enforcement of rules, overly strict rules for children, excessive occupancy standards, and refusal to make a reasonable accommodation for handicapped access, refusal to make necessary repairs, eviction, notices, illegal entry, rent increases or harassment.

These actions may be used as a way to force und esirable tenants to move on their own without the landlord having to make an eviction.

Apartment Association. The California Apartment Association (CAA) is the country’s largest statewide trade association for rental property owners and managers. The CAA was incorporated in 1941 to serve rental property owners and managers throughout California. The CAA represents rental housing owners and professionals who manage more than 1.5 million rental units. Under the umbrella agency, various apartment associations cover specific geographic areas.

The CAA has developed the California Certified Residential Manager (CCRM) program to provide a comprehensive series of courses geared toward improving the approach, attitude and professional skills of onsite property man agers and other interested individuals. The CCRM program consists of instruction that includes training on fair housing and ethics issues. In addition, the continuing education requirements specify a minimum of two hours must be in Fair Housing.

9Okeon, M.R. (2008, January 21). “Keeping the House in Order: Watchdog Organization Has Fought Discrimination for Three Decades.” Pasadena Star-News.

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
100
The CAA supports the intent of all local, state and federal fair housing laws for all residents without regard to color, race, religion, sex, marital status, mental or physical disability, age, familial status, sexual orientation or national origin. Members of the CAA agree to abide by the following provisions of the organization’s Code for Equal Housing Opportunity:
▪ We agree that in the rental, lease, sale, purchase, or exchange of real property, owners and their employees have the responsibility to offer housing accommodations to all persons on an equal basis;
▪ We agree to set and implement fair and reasonable rental housing rules and guidelines and will provide equal and consistent services throughout our residents’ tenancy; ▪ We agree that we have no right or responsibility to volunteer information regarding the racial, creed, or ethnic composition of any neighborhood, and we do not engage in any behavior or action that would result in steering; and
▪ We agree not to print, display, or circulate any statement or advertisement that indicates any preference, limitations, or discrimination in the rental or sale of housing.

The local CAA office that serves Jurupa Valley is the Greater Inland Empire office located in Rancho Cucamonga. This office provides education and resources specific to Riverside County and the greater Inland Empire area.

Given the characteristics of Jurupa Valley’s apartment stock as predominately older and in smaller complexes, a large segment of the City’s rentals are not managed by pr ofessional management companies, and may not be members of CAA. These “mom and pop” property managers are more likely to be reached through the services offered by the FHCRC.

Publicly Assisted Rental Housing. The Housing Authority of the County of Riversi de (HACR) administers the Housing Choice Voucher Program (Section 8) for Riverside County and currently operates tenant based rental assistance programs serving low income, homeless, and veteran clients in eastern and western Riverside County. In order to quality for these programs, residents must have an annual gross income at or below 80 percent of the Area Median Income (AMI), or be seniors or persons with disabilities. According to the City’s certified Housing Element, 456 households in Jurupa Valley live in public housing units , and there were 2,551 Jurupa Valley households on the waiting list for public housing. The County of Riverside Economic Development Agency (EDA) estimates that 416 Jurupa Valley households curre ntly receive rental assistance, with an additional 2,551 households on the waiting list for assistance . Of those receiving rental assistance, 310 are seniors, 200 are disabled and 1 9 are veterans; no hom eless are currently receiving assistance.

Property owners, managers, and agents are given notice that they have a responsibility and a requirement under the law not to discriminate in the advertising or rental of property on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin. The Housing Authority also conducts quarterly Owner Seminars where owners and landlords are given information regarding City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
101
the Section 8 program. A packet is provided that includes Fair Housing information and a referral to the FHCRC for further information and assistance.

Rent Control Legislation . In October 2019, Governor Gavin Newsom signed the Tenant Protection Act of 2019 (AB 1482) into law. Effective January 1, 2020, t he law limits yearly rent increases to 5% plus inflation until the year 2030. This rental cap will not apply to apartment buildings built within the last 15 years or single-family home rentals. It also does not affect people currently living in rent-controlled units.10

Fair Housing Profile:

Evaluation and Assessment
This section provides an overview of the variety of fair housing and tenant/landlord mediation services available to Jurupa Valley residents. In general, fair housing services include investigating and resolving housing discrimination complaints, discrimination auditing and testing, education and outreach, such as disseminating fair housing information through written material, workshops and seminars. Landlord/tenant counseling services involve informing landlords and tenants of their rights and responsibilities under fair housing law and other consumer protection legislation and mediating disputes between landlords and tenants.

Fair Housing Services
All entitlement communities are required by HUD to have a reactive and pro -active fair housing program with specific actions and procedures that will have significant impact on preventing, reducing and eliminating housing discrimination and barriers to equal housing choice for all.

As of fiscal year 2018/2019, Jurupa Valley began contracting with the Fair Housing Council of Riverside County, Inc. (FHCRC) to provide fair housing services to the community . Prior to this time, Jurupa Valley was a cooperating city in the CDBG Urban Cou nty Program, and fair housing services were provided by the FHCRC through their contract with Riverside County. The FHCRC is a non-profit organization established in 19 86 dedicated to protect the housing rights of all individuals. FHCRC provides services throughout the County of Riverside that include educational workshops, educational outreach and investigation of discrimination complaints.

10 Dillion, Liam. (2019, October 8). “Q & A: How Will California’s New Rent Cap Affect Me?” Los Angeles Times and California Apartment Association. (2019, October 7). “Governor Signs AB 1482, Enacts Statewide Rent Cap.” CAA Website:
https://caanet.org.

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
102
Specifically, the City of Jurupa Valley contracts with FHCRC to provide fair housing servic es that include:
▪ Provide residents, landlords, and property managers with information and knowledge regarding fair housing laws with the goal of reducing or eliminating housing discrimination. ▪ Develop, expand, and provide more education and outreach to ho using providers, community organizations, and the general public requesting housing discrimination, fair housing laws, and services provided by the Fair Housing Council. ▪ Provide homebuyer education, credit counseling, and fair housing counseling and awareness training to first -time home buyers and homeowners, particularly low -income and very low-income applicants.
▪ Conduct audit testing, including audits exploring the possibility of disability discrimination. ▪ Encourage rental property owners, managers, and realtors to provide written documentation to all applicants that includes the listings of all available housing, standard information on the terms and conditions of the application process, such as income qualifications, down payments, and other fees and expenses and providing Fair Housing literature.
▪ Provide education and outreach to housing providers through seminars or community workshops regarding the current low on discrimination against the disabled. ▪ Work in cooperation with and support the efforts of non -profit community service providers that assist disabled persons in locating suitable housing through information, referrals and community education.

Support of these services are outlined in the City of Jurupa Valley’s Housing Element 2021-2029, certified by HCD on April 22, 2022, which calls for the City to promote equal housing opportunities for all persons (Goal HE 3). Programs to meet this goal include:
▪ HE 3.1.1: Utilize the services of the Fair Housing Council of Riverside County to implement a number of programs, including: 1) audits of lending institutions and rental establishments, 2) education and training of City staff, and 3) fair housing outreach and education regarding fair housing laws and resources.
▪ HE 3.1.2: Continue to use the services of the Fair Housing Council to provide education and outreach services to the public in both Spanish and English.

Education and Outreach
The FHCRC conducts extensive community outreach throughout Riverside County to promote fair housing choice awareness and knowledge. This includes t raining workshops for landlords, managers and owners. The following outlines topics covered:
▪ Conduct Training Workshops for Renters: The general types of activities conducted for renters includes a comprehensive fair housing presentation with particular focus placed on common landlord -tenant disputes and misconceptions about the law in the State o f City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
103
California. Topics include, but are not limited to repairs notices, lease agreements, landlord-tenant mediation, Section 8, evictions, habitability and occupancy standards ▪ Conduct Training Workshops for Housing Providers: The general types of activities conducted for housing providers include workshops tailored to provide detailed analysis of fair housing laws and interpretation, with specific information on discrimination against families with children, people with disabilities, sexual harassment, hate c rimes, and advertising.
▪ Increase Public Awareness: The general types of activities conducted to increase public awareness includes developing and distributing hundreds of pieces of multilingual literature throughout the County, aimed at a variety of audiences, describing how housing injustices arise, the laws that protect against housing discrimination, and ways to prevent housing inequality.

Fair Housing Enforcement
FHCRC investigates allegations of discrimination based on a person’s status as a member of one of the State or Federal protected categories, which include: Race, Color, Religion, National Origin, Sex, Familial Status, Disability, Marital Status, Sexual Orientation, Ancestry, Age, Source of Income, and Arbitrary Characteristics. Race, Color, Reli gion, National Origin, Sex, Familial Status, and Disability are the categories protected by the federal Fair Housing Act. The State of California provides protection from discrimination based on all seven of the federal protected categories and has added Marital Status, Sexual Orientation, Ancestry, Age, Source of Income and Arbitrary Characteristics as additional protected classes under state law. Once a Fair Housing complaint is received, FHCRC educates the complainant of their rights and responsibilities . The complainants are advised of possible further investigation depending on the complaint.

FHCRC uses government regulated testing methodologies to enforce, support, and conduct fair housing investigations. A housing discrimination complaint can be investigated through testing, the gathering of witness statements and through research surveys. Based on the details provided by the complainant, FHCRC will either investigate the complaint or advise the complainants of their other options, which include c onciliation, Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH), or a private attorney.

During the past year – FHCRC has not had any discrimination complaints. FHCRC received over 400 complaints, mostly tenant-landlord complaints, most likely dealing with rent increases – but none regarding housing discrimination. Most of the complaints were from racial category White (87.8 percent, followed by African American at 10.0 percent and Asian at 2.2 percent. Ethnic category – Hispanic – consisted of 75.1 percent of the total persons contacting FHCRC within the last year.

Discrimination Suits
There have been no fair housing complaints in Jurupa Valley in which the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has issued a charge of discrimination, nor any housing discrimination suit filed by the Department of Justice (DOJ).

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
104
Landlord-Tenant Services
In addition to fair housing complaints, the Fair Housing Council of Riverside County (FHCRC) receives calls from Jurupa Valley residents requesting assistance with landlord/tenant issues.

Clients, both landlords and tenants, contact FHCRC regarding a multitude of reasons. They include notices, evictions, rental/lease terms, repairs, rent increases and security deposits, among others.

Hate Crimes
Hate crimes are crimes that are committed because of a bias against race, religion, sexual orientation, ethnicity, disability, or gender identity. In an attempt to determine the scope and nature of hate crimes, the State of California publishes an annual list of hate crimes by County and City. During the latest year where data i s available – 2022 – there were no hate crimes reported in Jurupa Valley, with 41 hate crimes reported in Riverside County. Please see Table 1 . It is important to note that not all incidences of intimidation, interference or other discriminatory activities rise to the level of hate crimes and not all incidents are reported to police.

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
105

Table 5-1
Hate Crimes
in Riverside County and Jurupa Valley, 2022
County and
Jurisdiction Events Offenses Victims Suspects
Riverside
County 41 61 56 47
Sheriff’s
Dept. 1 2 2 2
Banning 2 2 2 2

Beaumont 3 3 3 2
Blythe 2 2 2 2
Cathedral
City 3 4 4 3
Corona 2 2 2 3
Desert Hot
Springs 1 1 1 1
Hemet 2 3 2 2
Moreno
Valley 1 1 1 1
Palm
Desert 1 3 1 1
Palm
Springs 6 7 6 5
Rancho
Mirage 1 2 2 1
Riverside 12 17 16 15
R. Comm.

College 1 9 9 1
UC
Riverside 3 3 3 6
Source: California Department of Justice, 2022 Hate Crime Report Services for Hate Crime Victims
Both the State and County have programs providing assistance to hate crime victims. The Office of Attorney General has established a Victims’ Services Unit that provides support, information, and assistance to victims at every stage of the criminal process. The Office of Attorney General City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
106
has also established a Hate Crime Rapid R esponse Team. The team has employees of the Department of Justice who, if rapidly deployed, may assist local and federal law enforcement authorities in the identification, arrest, prosecution, and conviction of the perpetrators of hate crimes. The team is on call at all times.

The City of Jurupa Valley is a contract city with the Riverside County Sheriff's Department. The personnel assigned to Jurupa Valley operate out of the Jurupa Valley Station. The County of Riverside District Attorney’s Office has a Victim Services Division designated to ensure victims are informed and supported throughout the criminal justice process. Victim Service Advocates work closely with prosecutors and are specially trained and educated to help children, elders, disabled persons and violent crime victims.

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
107

6. Progress Since 2018
This chapter summarizes private and public sector impediments identified in the prior 2019-2023 AI for the City of Jurupa Valley, and the progress in implementing actions to address these impediments. The continued existence of these impediments, along with the appropriateness of identified actions to be carried forward in Jurupa Valley’s 2024-2029 AI are also evaluated.

Affordable Housing
2024 Status: Although removed as a listed impediment to fair housing - the City of Jurupa Valley complies with federal and state laws in its support of affordable housing, and has included several actions in both its Housing Element and this AI to help continue to remove constraints to such development.

Lack of Available Housing
2024 Status: Although removed as a listed impediment to fair housing choice in this AI, the City recognizes that a lack of available housing—particularly for low- and moderate-income people— has the potential to disproportionately affect members of protected classes. The City has adopted policies and programs in its Housing Element to encourage, and where possible, assist in the development of quality housing to meet the City’s share of regional housing needs for all income levels and special needs populations.

Credit Check / Leasing Issues
2024 Status: Although this issue was addressed, landlord-tenant issues continue to arise at public meetings, surveys and also with calls to the City ’s provider of fair ho using services. This issue illustrates the fine line between landlord/tenant issues and bona-fide fair housing discrimination.

Over the last five years, FHCRC has encouraged rental property owners, managers, and realtors to provide written documentation to all applicants that includes the listings of all available housing, standard information on the terms and conditions of the application process, such as income qualifications, down payments, and other fees and expenses, posting Fair Housing informational signs and providing Fair Housing literature. These best practice recommendations serve to protect the interests of both the landlord and the tenant or prospective tenant.

FHCRC quarterly reports for the current fiscal year in Jurupa Valley show that no one has filed a complaint about discrimination. Although FHCRC received 401 calls from Jurupa Valley residents, none were from residents asking for help with housing discrimination issues. The calls received were primarily landlord/tenant-related issues (top three issues/questions residents called FHCRC were for notices, rental increases, and lease terms).

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
108
Predatory Lending / Steering
The 2019 AI indicates that based on review of Mortgage Discl osure Act (HMDA) data for 2017, mortgage loan denial rates among African American applicants in Jurupa Valley were significantly higher at 27.5 percent, than for any other racial or ethnic group, including Hispanics (15%), non - Hispanic Whites (14.2%), and Asians (13.5%).
2024 Status: Continued. The City of Jurupa Valley monitored the denial rates for African Americans and noted that the denial rates have been about the same as they were five years ago . For the year 2022 denial rates for home purchase loans overall was 20.5 percent. The lowest denial rates in Jurupa Valley were among by Asians (14.8%), and Whites (19.5%). Denial rates of Hispanics were at 23.1%, African Americans at 27.1%, with the Hawaiian/Pacific Islanders having the highest denial rates at 40.0%. So, while loan denial rates have increased for almost all racial groups, they had declined slightly for African Americans in Jurupa Valley.

Discrimination against Persons with Disabilities
The 2019 AI states while the FHCRC has provided education and outreach to help try to alleviate discrimination against persons with disabilitie s, given its continued prevalence, this impediment has not been adequately addressed and remains a high priority in this AI. 2024 Status: Continue. While the FHCRC has provided education and outreach to help try to alleviate discrimi nation against persons with disabilities, given its continued prevalence – and aging of the po pulation – who tend to have more disabilities - this impediment has not been adequately addressed and remains a priority in this AI.

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
109

7. Conclusions and Recommendations

The Jurupa Valley AI evaluates a wide range of housing issues and potential barriers to fair housing.

The following section builds upon this analysis, outlines conclusions, and provides recommendations for the City and its community partners to address id entified impediments to fair housing choice.

Summary of Conclusions/Findings
The following summarizes the key findings from the AI:

Community Profile
• In 20 22, 21.1 percent of the City’s population was under the age of 18 years and 1 1.4 percent was 65 years and over. These two age groups are an indicator of the reliance of children and senior citizens on the working age population, also known as the dependency ratio. Lower the dependency ratio, the lesser the “burden” is on a community’s working age residents.
• The Hispanic ethnic population represent 72.0 percent of the City’s total population, which is higher than the countywide total of 50.8 percent. All minority groups in the City account for over three-quarters of the City total population. • The majority (57.3%) of Jurupa Valley households spoke a language other than English at home. Most Jurupa Valley residents (54.3%) speak Spanish as their primary language. • The Section 8 Housing Voucher Program administered by the Housing Authority of Riverside County (HARC) assisted 416 low-income renters living in Jurupa Valley. The majority of these renters are senior and/or disabled households. The Hispanic population is under represented in the program. Approximately one -quarter of the voucher holders identified as Hispanic; however, the Hispanic ethnic population represents two -third of the City’s total population. In 2023, approximately 2,551 households were on the waitlist for federal rental assistance.
• Seniors (age 65+) represent 11.4 percent of Jurupa Valley’s population . Some of the characteristics of elderly residents included: limited mobility; increased medical attention due to health complications; and, restricted fixed income, such as Social Security, pension programs and retirement income. In Jurupa Valley, the most commonly occurring disability amongst seniors 65 and older was an ambulatory disability, experienced by 28.1 percent of Jurupa Valley's seniors
City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
110
• Approximately 22 percent of Jurupa Valley residents age five years old and older had some type of disability. The top three disabilities among persons age five and older include those with ambulatory difficulty, independent living difficulty, and cognitive difficulty. • Approximately 42 percent of the owner-occupied units in the City were built before 1980, and 18% were built before 1960 , per the Housing Element . Of the City’s renter -occupied units, 47% were built before 1980, and 21% were built before 1960. In general, homes built more than 30 years ago are likely to require structural renovation and increased maintenance, resulting in greater costs for the owner. Older homes can also create health and safety problems for occupants, as many deteriorated structures often do not meet current building code standards and lack safety features such as fire suppression , home security devices, and seismic safety retrofits. In addition, there are greater lead -based paint related health risks. Based on housing age alone, a significant portion of Jurupa Valley’s housing stock could require rehabilitation in the upcoming decade. • The 2023 Point-In-Time Homeless Count reported there were 79 unsheltered homeless individuals counted in the City of Jurupa Valley. Over 80 percent of homeless person were White and almost half (46%) Hispanic (many of the Hispanics were also considered White).

Approximately 62 percent were chronically homeless, 1 9 percent had a mental health condition, and approximately half had a physical or developmental disability. No children or families with children were interviewed in the count. • The average household size in Jurupa Valley was 3.90. Over 30 percent of the City’s households were considered large households (5 or more persons per household). Large households are a special needs group because of the lack of available affordable housing of adequate size. To save for necessities such as food, clothing, transportation, and medical care, lower- and moderate-income large households may reside in smaller units, resulting in overcrowding.
• Overcrowding (defined as more than one person per room) occurred in 11 .7 percent of the City’s total occupied units and severe overcrowding (more than 1.5 persons per room) occurred in 4.1 percent of the total occupied units. Approximately double the figure of severe overcrowding occurred in rental units than owner -occupied units. This indicates the need for larger rental units and/or more rental subsidies to allow large households to afford adequately sized units.
• The most prevalent housing problem facing Jurupa Valley households was overpayment on housing cost. A household is considered to be overpaying for housing if housing costs (rent plus utilities) make up more than 30 percent of the household’s gross monthly income. Overpaying occurred with 36.1 percent o f the total occupied units. Renter households tended to overpay more for housing than owners occupied households.

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
111
Fair Housing Profile
• Fair housing education and outreach to housing providers and owners is provided through the Fair Housing Council of Riverside County (FHCRC), the California Apartment Owner’s Association (CAA), and for properties with Section 8 rent vouchers, the Housing Authority of the County of Riverside (HACR). Given the characteristics of Jurupa Valley’s apartment stock as predominately older and in smaller complexes, a large segment of the City’s rentals are not managed by professional management companies and small “mom and pop” mangers may not be trained in fair housing laws. As small property managers/owners are typically the primary violators of fair housing laws, targeted outreach to this group by the FHCRC remains critical.
• In Jurupa Valley, there have been not housing discrimination cases opened in recent years.

Most housing complaints are regarding increases in rent or other landlord -tenant issues.

However, It will be important to monitor discrimination complaints in the City over time to make sure that if any discrimination cases arise – that they are properly addressed. • Hispanics comprise 72 percent of Jurupa Valley’s population, which reflect well the percentage of the landlord/tenant calls (75%) received by the FHCRC over the past year.

This could indicate that the City's Hispanic population is fully aware of the landlord/tenant services available to them.

Public Sector Impediments
• There is currently no mechanism specified in the Zoning Code to allow reasonable accommodation exceptions to zoning requirements for individuals with disabilities.

Currently, the City considers requests for reasonable accommodation when requests are made, without a formal application and approval process. As part of this Housing Element’s Programs, the City will adopt a formal reasonable accommodation ordinance into the Zoning Code.
• The narrow definition of "family" in the City's Zoning Code was removed as it was too constraining to the diverse household types in the City. . The City instead used a housing element program to allow for a more open-ended interpretation of what a family is under the housing element and City code. There is no current plan to create a new definition for family in the City of Jurupa Valley due to the possibility of creating unnecessary restrictions to options for housing in the City.
• Providing development opportunities for a variety of housing types helps to address the diverse range of housing needs present in a community. Senior citizens, persons with disabilities, veterans, and persons suffering from homelessness, among others, may require non-traditional housing types. As required under state and federal law, Jurupa Valley’s Zoning Code has been amended to better facilitate the following types of housing:
residential care facilities, SROs, transitional and supportive housing, emergency homeless shelters, and farm worker/employee housing.
• Based on the affordability gap analysis conducted in the City’s Housing Element, market rents in Jurupa Valley are beyond the level of affordability of lower income (<80% AMI) City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
112
households, and housing sales prices are beyond the level of affordability of mo derate income (<120% AMI) households. Local tools including inclusionary zoning and density bonuses can be used to facilitate the production of units affordable to low- and moderate- income households, and further goals for economic integration.

Private Sector Impediments
• The approval rate for home purchase loans in Jurupa Valley in 2022 was 79.5 percent. • The mortgage loan denial rate in Jurupa Valley was 20.5 percent. The lowest denial rates in Jurupa Valley were among by Asians (1 4.8%), and Whites (1 9.5%). Denial rates of Hispanics were at 23.1%, African Americans at 27.1%, with the Hawaiian/Pacific Islanders having the highest denial rates at 40.0%.
• Realtors and Property Managers participating in the City’s AI outreach efforts were not aware of any discriminatory practices in Jurupa Valley. • City and Other Staff that has extensive contact with residents of Jurupa Valley, in departments such as City Planning, Development Ser vices/Economic Development, Engineering, Building and Safety, and Police (Riverside Sheriff’s Department) were not aware of any discriminatory practices in Jurupa Valley. They had not received any complaints from residents.

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
113
Recommended Actions to Address Impediments

The City of Jurupa Valley provides the State of California’s Housing and Community Development Department (HCD) with annual updates on Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) activities.

For 202 3, the City’s AFFH implementation status o f planned actions are summarized below in Table 7-1:

Table 7-1
Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Implementation Status 2023

Action Area Description
Future
Work
Effort
In Process Ongoing or
Complete

1. Develop ADU informational materials and
‘as built’ sample plans to promote the
development of ADUs in the City.

2. Monitor the production and affordability
of ADUs annually to ensure the City is meeting
the assumption of 15 AUDs per year as
outlined in this Housing Element.

1. Encourage the HARC to continue to
provide housing choice vouchers to a
minimum of 344 households in Jurupa Valley
and increase voucher usage in higher
opportunity areas.

2. Work with HARC and FHCRC to encourage
small property owners to participate in HACR’s
Housing Choice Voucher Assistance Program

1. Provide incentives to encourage the
development of a range of creative and
affordable housing types to accommodate
homeless persons, seniors, disabled persons,
and other low and extremely low-income
populations, such as single-room occupancy
dwellings (SROs), prefabricated housing, tiny
houses, and other emerging housing products
through fee waivers or deferrals, flexible
development standards, supporting funding
applications, etc.

2. Work with local developers to include
affordable housing units in all new housing
developments during the entitlement process.

3. Develop an inclusionary housing
ordinance to increase the variety of affordable
housing to provide for special needs groups
that aren’t being reached right now according
to the AFFH.

4. Allocate funding for Infrastructure
improvements citywide including, but not
limited to, pedestrian and bicycle
improvements, complete streets and corridor
beautification, ADA improvements, and Safe
Routes to School enhancements with a priority
in the most economically impacted
neighborhoods.

PUBLIC HOUSING

AND RENTAL

ASSISTANCE
X
New Opportunities in Higher Opportunity Areas

PROVIDE HOUSING

OPPORTUNITIES IN
HIGHER

OPPORTUNITY AREAS

FOR ALL MEMBERS OF

THE COMMUNITY
x
Implementation Status
Housing Mobility
ADUs x
City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
114

Table 7-1
AFFIRMATIVELY FURTHERING FAIR HOUSING IMPLEMENTATION STATUS 2023 (Cont’d)

Action Area Description
Future
Work
Effort
In Process Ongoing or
Complete

TRADITIONAL

NEIGHBORHOOD

DESIGN STANDARDS

1. Promote the development of smaller
single-family homes on smaller lots using the
Traditional Neighborhood Design Standards to
developers through the entitlement process.

Also develop promotional materials such as
educational fliers/handouts on Traditional
Neighborhood Design Standards for
dissemination to the development community
and in meetings with developers.

AFFORDABLE MOBILE
HOMES

CONSERVATION

1. Conserve affordable mobile home housing
stock and help bring such housing up to code
through periodic outreach and mobile home
loan and improvement grants funded by CDBG
and other funds, as available.

SUBSTANDARD

HOUSING

CONDITIONS

1. Allocate CDBG grant for housing update
and rehabilitation for most aged housing stock
for homes older than 50 years.

1. Allocate CDBG funding to creating locally
hosted educational workshops on fair housing
to reduce the amount of discrimination

2. Provide social media and fact
sheets/resource alternatives to access fair
housing info with links to the City website

3. Collaborate with Fair Housing Council of
Riverside County for continued tracking of fair
housing enforcement for discrimination cases.

1. Provide informational materials on the
Youth Opportunity Center at City Hall and
promote the Center through social media
platforms and regular updates at City Council
meetings.

2. Make meeting rooms available to the
Center at the City’s Jurupa Valley Operations
Center located in the Rubidoux area.

3. Assist the Center in the preparation of
grant applications as needed.

4. Work with the Rubidoux Youth
Opportunity Center to promote their services
in census tracts with concentrated poverty and
highest need.

PROVIDE ADDITIONAL

PARKLAND IN AREAS

OF CONCENTRATED

POVERTY

1. Provide technical support and assistance
to JARPD to acquire and develop a ¾ acre park
in the Mission / Wallace / Daly area.

SUPPORT AT-RISK

CHILDREN AND
YOUTH
X
Implementation Status
Place-based Strategies for Community Revitalization

ENFORCEMENT AND

OUTREACH TO
REDUCE

DISCRIMINATION
X
City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
115
Table 7-1
AFFIRMATIVELY FURTHERING FAIR HOUSING IMPLEMENTATION STATUS 2023 (Cont’d)

Source: City of Jurupa Valley Housing Department, Jan. 2024 Additional AI r ecommendations are organized by activity type as outlined in HUD’s 1998 Fair Housing Planning Guide. The recommendations listed below are primarily implemented by the Fair Housing Council of Riverside County (FHCRC), with coordination and oversight by the City's Development Services Department.

1. Education and Outreach Activities
Action 1.1: In partnership with the FHCRC, conduct multi -faceted fair housing outreach to Jurupa Valley tenants, landlords, property owners, realtors, and property management companies. Methods of outreach will include workshops, informational booths at community even ts, presentations to civic leaders and community groups, public service announcements, and distribution of multi-lingual fair housing literature.

Ensure the Hispanic community is provided with accessible information on available fair housing and landlord/tenant services.

Action 1.2: Ensure the FHCRC conducts focused outreach and education to small property owners/landlords on fair housing, and reasonable accommodation and reasonable modification issues in particular. FHCRC will continue to c onduct property manager trainings on a regular basis, targeting managers of smaller properties, and promote Action Area Description
Future
Work
Effort
In Process Ongoing or
Complete

1. Ensure that affected residents have the
opportunity to participate in decisions that
affect their health (EJ 1.1).

2. Schedule public meetings on key issues
affecting the public at times and locations
most convenient to community members (EJ

1.4).

3. Provide translation and interpretation
services at public meetings on issues affecting
populations whose primary language is not
English. Translation time should not be taken
from the person’s time limit for comments (EJ

1.6).

1. Work with FHCRC to continue to provide
access to aid and financial counseling for
residents and develop an outreach plan for the
neighborhoods with the greatest
concentration of poverty.

2. Promote the development of affordable
units through City policies and State Law on
every housing project in entitlement

PROMOTE

MEANINGFUL

ENGAGEMENT IN THE

PUBLIC DECISION-

MAKING PROCESS
X
Displacement

DISPLACEMENT RISK

OF LOW-INCOME

RESIDENTS DUE TO

ECONOMIC

PRESSURES
X
Implementation Status
City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
116
the California Certified Resident Manager program offered through the California Apartment Association.

Action 1.3: Encourage the FHCRC and Housing Authority of Riverside County work to enhance access to services and housing for residents with limited English proficiency.

For the federal CDBG program, the City will provide public notices in English and Spanish, and ensure translators are available at public meetings.

Action 1.4: Contact the Housing Authority of Riverside County (HARC) regarding the apparent under-representation of Hispanic households in the Housing Choice Voucher program. As warranted, request that HARC conduct targeted outreach as defined in its Administrative Plan.

2. Enforcement Activities
Action 2.1: Continue to provide investigation and response to allegations of illegal housing discrimination through the FHCRC. For cases that cannot be conciliated, the FHCRC will refer case to the Department of Fair Housing and Employment (DFEH), U.S.

Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), small claims court, or to a private attorney, as warranted.

Action 2.2: On an annual basis and in c oordination with the FHCRC, review discrimination complaints to assess Jurupa Valley trends and patterns over time, and tailor fair housing education and outreach accordingly.

Action 2.3: Continue to work with FHCRC to provide general counseling and referrals over the phone regarding tenant-landlord issues.

3. Monitoring Lending, Housing Providers, and Local Real Estate Practices Action 3.1: City shall continue to monitor mortgage loan denial rates among African American households and other racial/ethnic groups. As warranted, contact the City’s major mortgage lenders to discuss the City’s concerns.

Action 3.2: City may contract with an organization to h elp protect homeowners from mortgage rescue fraud by promoting the use of HUD -certified, non-profit mortgage counseling agencies on the City’s website and other means.

Action 3.3: City may contract with an organization to help coordinate with local realtors and conduct outreach to the local real estate community on predatory mortgage lending practices, loan modification scams, and the rights of tenants in foreclosed properties.

The Jurupa Valley Chamber of Commerce, which has members that are realtors and real estate lenders, could be a key organization to contact for this Action.

Action 3.4: Through the Fair Housing Council of Riverside County (FHCRC), monitor on-line advertising of rental housing for fair housing violations on a quarterly basis, investigate if warranted, and refer to California Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH) for possible enforcement. Take steps to encourage th e Press Enterprise to City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
117
publish a Fair Housing Notice and a "no pets" disclaimer in the For Rent Classified section.

Action 3.5: Continue to include non -discriminatory and fair housing language in all City affordable housing contracts and agreements.

4. Land Use Policies to Affirmatively Further Fair Housing Action 4.1: Currently, the City considers requests for reasonable accommodation when requests are made, without a formal application and approval process. As part of this Housing Element’s Programs, the City will adopt a formal reasonable accommodation ordinance into the Zoning Code.

Action 4.2: As part of the previous housing element, the City removed the definition of “family” as it was too constraining to the diverse household types in the Jurupa Valley.

The City instead used a housing element program to allow for a more open -ended interpretation of what a family is under the housing element and City code. There is no current plan to create a new definition for family in the City of Jurupa Valley due to the possibility of creating unnecessary restrictions to options for housing in the City.

Action 4.3: The City is also amending t he current zoning code to include the necessary provisions to meet the Lanterman Act and will include and allow for group homes, boarding homes for person with disabilities.

Action 4.4: As a means of expanding housing choice for extremely low income renters, including persons with disabilities and veterans, amend the Zoning Code to include provisions for single room occupancy units (SROs). SRO State law mandates that local jurisdictions address the provision of housing options for extremely low -income households, including Single Room Occupancy units (SRO). SRO units are typically one room units intended for occupancy by a single individual. They are distinct from a studio or efficiency unit, in that a studio is a one-room unit that must contain a kitchen and a bathroom. Although SRO units are not required to have a kitchen or bathroom, many SROs have one or the other. There are minimum standards for SROs (including a minimum floor area requirement) under the C alifornia Health and Safety Code. The City of Jurupa Valley’s Zoning Code does not specifically address SROs. As part of this Housing Element, the City will include provisions to address SRO housing.

Action 4.5: State law establishes transitional and supportive housing as residential uses and therefore, local governments cannot treat these uses differently from other similar types of residential uses (e.g., requiring a use permit when other residential uses of similar function do not require a use permit). As part of the development of the City’s Housing Element, Jurupa Valley will include provisions for transitional and supportive housing, pursuant to current state law.

Action 4.6: In cooperation with nonprofit organizations, adjacent cities, and with Riverside County, encourage the development of a homeless shelter to meet Jurupa Valley’s and adjacent communities’ homeless shelter needs. Per City’s certified Housing Element, Jurupa Valley will work on a homeless shelter plan within the next 24 months.

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
118

Action 4.7: Amend the Zoning Code for consistency with t he California Employee Housing Act which requires that housing for six or fewer employees – including the need to address the need for farmworker housing - be treated as a regular residential use.

Action 4.8: Amend the Zoning Code to eliminate the requirement for discretionary review for multi -family development in multi -family residential zones to better facilitate permit processing for projects that conform to the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance development standards. In 2020, the City adopted objective multifamily residential development standards to f acilitate the ministerial review of multifamily housing projects that reserve a minimum of 10% of the units affordable to lower income households. As of the preparation of the Housing Element, the City is in the process of formalizing the process through t he preparation of an application and other procedures. Applicants for affordable multi -family projects that conform with underlying general plan and zoning designations need only to submit for building permits. Applications are routed to the Community Deve lopment Department to determine conformance with the City’s objective multifamily development standards.

Staff will work with applicants directly on any minor design changes needed to ensure conformance thus allowing projects to remain in an expedited mini sterial building permit review process. This process eliminates the need for a discretionary Site Development Permit and CEQA for affordable housing projects, but still requires impact studies where site conditions warrant them.

5. Increasing Geographic Choice in Housing
Action 5.1: While housing affordability is not a fair housing issue per se, providing a variety of housing opportunities can help lessen the likelihood of housing discrimination by increasing the supply. Jurupa Valley may facilitate the provision of affordable housing throughout the community through: 1) available financial assistance; 2) flexible development standards; 3) density bonuses; and 4) consideration of development fee waivers.

Action 5.2: Implement the new Mixed-Use Overlay and Town Center Overlay land use designations (applied to three historic core areas, namely Rubidoux, Pedley, and Glen Avon) established as part of the City’s General Plan . Continue to w ork with the Riverside County Housing Authority, housing non -profits and housing developers to identify specific sites for developing housing suitable to very low-income households, including seniors, disabled persons, veterans, farm workers and the homeless.

Action 5.3: Complete a study for an inclusionary housing ordinance to be developed and implemented in the City . P reviously an inclusionary housing ordinance was administered by the County of Riverside . As the City continues to grow and attempts to accommodate the development of its various communities, it is a key goal to make the effort to provide better housing for all income levels.

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
119
Action 5.4: Continue to implement the City’s density bonus, which reflects the current State density bonus law to better facilitate the provision of mixed income housing.

The State density bonus law requires local governments to grant a density bonus and additional incentives and reductions in parking requirements to a developer of a qualifying housing project – for example, applicants that agree to provide a certain percentage of very low-income units, low-income units, or moderate-income units.

City of Jurupa Valley

Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing Choice
120
I, Rod B. Butler, City Manager, hereby certify that this Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice for the City of Jurupa Valley represents the City’s conclusions about impediments to fair housing choice, as well as the actions necessary to address any identified impediments.

________________________________ Date____________________ Rod B. Butler, City Manager
City of Jurupa Valley

Appendix A
Public Notice Affidavit, Community Outreach, Sign-In Sheets and Public Presentation

Public Notice Affidavit
Insert affidavit
Fair Housing Survey - City Web Page
Fair Housing Community Outreach
City of Jurupa Valley
Fair Housing Survey – English and Spanish
City Web Page
Fair Housing Survey – English and Spanish
City Social Media Web Page
Fair Housing Survey – English and Spanish
City Social Media Web Page
Fair Housing Survey - English and Spanish
City Social Media Web Page
Community Outreach Meetings on
City Facebook Page
Community Outreach Meetings on
City Calendar Web Page
Community Outreach Meetings Flyers at
Jurupa Valley City Hall - Lobby Area
8930 Limonite Ave.

Jurupa Valley, CA 92509

Community Outreach Meetings Flyers at
Louis Robidoux Public Library
5840 Mission Blvd
Jurupa Valley, CA 92509

Community Outreach Meetings Flyers at
Glen Avon Library Public Library
9244 Galena St.

Jurupa Valley, CA 92509
Sign-In Sheets
Fair Housing Community Meetings

Fair Housing Public
Meeting
Analysis of Impediments
to Fair Housing Choice
2024-2029
Community Workshop
December 19, 2023
Community Workshop
Jurupa Valley City Hall
8930 Limonite Avenue
Jurupa Valley,
CA 92509
Tuesday
December 19, 2023
@ 6:00 PM

Community Workshop Series
Analysis of
Impediments
to Fair
Housing
Stakeholder
Community
Workshop 1
JV City Hall Dec.
12, 2023
Community
Workshop 2
JV City Hall
Dec. 19, 2023
Tuesday, Dec. 12 at 3:00PM
JV City Hall
8930 Limonite Avenue
Tuesday, Dec. 19 at 6:00PM
JV City Hall
8930 Limonite Avenue
1 1
2 Today’s Community Workshop
▪ Introduction to Fair Housing Plan
▪ Implement the Fair Housing Act’s statutory mandate to affirmatively further fair housing (AFFH). HUD’s goal to ensure its program participants proactively take meaningful actions to overcome patterns of segregation, promote fair housing choice, eliminate disparities in opportunities, and foster inclusive communities free from discrimination.
▪ Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (AI): HUD allows program participants to undertake AI fair housing planning to support certification of compliance with AFFH ▪ Public Outreach/Comments
▪ AI Approval Process
2 Fair Housing Plan
▪ Jurisdictions receiving federal funds must certify
that they are affirmatively promoting fair housing.

Certification means:
✓ Prepare an Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing
Choice (AI) or other form of fair housing planning every 5 years
✓ City annually reviews/certifies to HUD taking actions to eliminate identified impediments
✓ Maintain fair housing records reflecting the actions taken 3 3
Definition of Fair Housing
4 ▪ Fair housing describes a condition in which individuals of similar income levels in the same housing market
have a similar range of choices available to them
regardless of following characteristics:
✓ Race or color
✓ Religion
✓ Sex
✓ Marital or familial status
✓ National origin
✓ Disability
✓ Gender
✓ Gender identity and expression
✓ Sexual orientation
✓ Source of income
✓ Age
✓ Ancestry
✓ Genetic Information
✓ Other Arbitrary Basis
4 Definition of Fair Housing Impediments
▪ Fair Housing Impediment defined as:
”Any actions, omissions, or decisions based on
race, color, ancestry, national origin, religion, sex,
disability, marital status, familial status or any
other arbitrary factor which restricts, or has the
effect of restricting the availability of housing
choices.”
▪ To affirmatively promote equal housing
opportunity, communities must work to remove
impediments to fair housing choice
5 Definition of Fair Housing Impediments
6 ▪ Economic factors that impact housing choice
are not fair housing issues per se
▪ Only when household income combined with
other factors – e.g. race – impact housing
choice is it a fair housing issue
▪ Tenant/landlord disputes only become fair
housing issues when based on factors
protected under fair housing laws
Key Components of the Analysis of
Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (AI)
▪ Regional and Community Profiles
✓ Demographic and socioeconomic
✓ Household and housing characteristics
✓ Employment
✓ Special needs
✓ Public assisted housing
✓ Access to public transportation
▪ Mortgage Lending Practices
✓ Lending patterns by race/ethnicity and income levels
✓ Lending performance by lenders
7 Key Components of the AI
▪ Public Policies and Practices (General Plans/Zoning/
Building Codes)
✓ Land use policies/development standards
✓ Reasonable accommodations
✓ Housing for special needs (disabled, seniors, homeless, etc) ✓ Residential development fees
▪ Fair Housing Practices
✓ Rental and homeownership market
✓ Fair housing services
✓ Trends in discrimination cases
8 Key Components of the AI
▪ Status of Actions from the Previously Completed
2019-2023 JV AI
✓ Were the actions implemented and were they successful? ✓ Should the actions be continued in the new Jurupa Valley’s AI? ▪ Findings and Recommendations
✓ Identify potential impediments to fair housing choice ✓ Recommendations /actions to address impediments
9 Jurupa Valley Profile: Race/Ethnicity
2017
Sources: US Census, American Community Survey 2013-17 & July 1, 2022 10 White 41.5% 54.0%
Black or African American 3.4% 3.3%
American Indian and Alaska Native 1.1% 1.1%
Asian 4.6% 2.7%
Nat. Hawaiian and Other Pacific
Islander 0.1% 0.2%
Other Race 38.7% 34.9%
Two or more races 10.6% 3.9%
Total 107,609 102,202
Hispanic or Latino (any race) 71.9% 69.6%
White - Not Hispanic 18.7% 22.9%
2022
Jurupa Valley: Home Purchase Loans & Denials
2022
Loans
Sources: US Census, American Community Survey 2013-17 & July 1, 2022, CLC Compliance Technologies, Inc.. Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council
11 Pop.

White 41.5% 47.5% 45.2%
Black or African American 3.4% 4.0% 5.2%
American Indian and Alaska
Native 1.1% 0.7% 1.0%
Asian 4.6% 18.2% 13.1%
Nat. Hawaiian and Other Pacific
Islander 0.1% 0.3% 0.7%
Other Race 38.7% 27.1% 34.1%
Two or more races 10.6% 2.3% 0.6%
Total 107,609 1,486 1,486
Hispanic or Latino (any race) 71.9% 49.5% 53.9%
DenialsRace - Ethnicity
Profile: Age and Disability
Source: US Census Bureau, 2021
12 Total Civilian Non-Institutionalized
Population % of Tot % with Disability
Under 18 years 29,577 27.8% 2.2%
18 to 64 Years 66,725 62.7% 7.4%
65 Years and Older 10,169 9.6% 22.8%
Total 106,471 100.00% 7.43%
Community Outreach
▪ What are the Most Important Fair Housing
Issues and Needs?
▪ What Actions can the City, Fair Housing Service
Providers, and Community Stakeholders Pursue
to Address These Fair Housing Needs?
✓ Comments
✓ Survey Forms
13 Needs & Housing Surveys
▪ On-line Housing Impediments survey on the
City’s website at:
http://www.jurupavalley.org/_________
▪ Copies of surveys at City Hall & libraries. Please
return the survey(s) to City Hall or by mail.
▪ Last day to submit surveys is 12/20/2023.
14 Planning Process – Important Dates
▪ Community Outreach
✓ November 13 to December 20, 2023 – AI Housing Survey
✓ December 12, 2023 – Stakeholder & Community
✓ December 19, 2023 -- Community
▪ 30-Day Public Review of Draft AI
✓ February 2023
▪ City Council Public Hearing
✓ March 21, 2023
▪ March __, 2023 – City Manager signs AI approval
(process complete)
15 Fair Housing Services
▪ Provide programs and services for the elimination
of discrimination, general housing (tenants and
landlords) service and education to cities
▪ Fair Housing Council-Riverside Co. (951) 682 - 6581
▪ Jurupa Valley City Hall:

Amy Sells, Senior Management Analyst
[email protected]
(951) 332-6464 x249
16 Thank You
If you have additional questions or comments
after this workshop, please contact:

Amy Sells
City of Jurupa Valley
(951) 332-6464 x249
[email protected]

Appendix B
Fair Housing Survey Results (31 Responses in English, Plus 1 in Spanish) CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY HOUSING SURVEY (2024-29)
1 / 19
Q1 Please enter your ZIP Code:

Answered: 31 Skipped: 0
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY HOUSING SURVEY (2024-29)
2 / 19

83.33% 25

16.67% 5
Q2 Do you own or rent your home?
Answered: 30 Skipped: 1
TOTAL 30
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Own
Rent

ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Own
Rent
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY HOUSING SURVEY (2024-29)
3 / 19

25.81% 8

74.19% 23

0.00% 0
Q3 What is your gender?
Answered: 31 Skipped: 0
TOTAL 31
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Male
Female
Other (please
specify)

ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Male
Female
Other (please specify)
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY HOUSING SURVEY (2024-29)
4 / 19

6.45% 2

19.35% 6

38.71% 12

12.90% 4

9.68% 3
Q4 Age:

Answered: 31 Skipped: 0
TOTAL 31
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
18-24
25-34
35-44
45-54
55-64
65+

ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
18-24
25-34
35-44
45-54
55-64
65+
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY HOUSING SURVEY (2024-29)
5 / 19

60.00% 18

6.67% 2

3.33% 1

0.00% 0

26.67% 8
Q5 Race (please select one or more):

Answered: 30 Skipped: 1
TOTAL 30
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
White
Black
Asian
American
Indian or...

Native
Hawaiian or...

Other (please
specify)

ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
White
Black
Asian
American Indian or Alaska Native
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
Other (please specify)
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY HOUSING SURVEY (2024-29)
6 / 19

60.00% 18

40.00% 12
Q6 Ethnic Category (please select one)
Answered: 30 Skipped: 1
TOTAL 30
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Hispanic or
Latino
Non-Hispanic
or Latino

ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Hispanic or Latino
Non-Hispanic or Latino
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY HOUSING SURVEY (2024-29)
7 / 19

3.23% 1

96.77% 30
Q7 Do you have a disability?
Answered: 31 Skipped: 0
TOTAL 31
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Yes
No

ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Yes
No
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY HOUSING SURVEY (2024-29)
8 / 19

54.84% 17

45.16% 14
Q8 Do you have children under the age of 18 years old in your home? Answered: 31 Skipped: 0
TOTAL 31
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Yes
No

ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Yes
No
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY HOUSING SURVEY (2024-29)
9 / 19

16.13% 5

74.19% 23

9.68% 3
Q9 Have you ever encountered any form of housing discrimination or knowsomeone who has? Answered: 31 Skipped: 0
TOTAL 31
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Yes
No
Not Sure

ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Yes
No
Not Sure
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY HOUSING SURVEY (2024-29)
10 / 19

37.50% 6

25.00% 4

18.75% 3

0.00% 0

6.25% 1

43.75% 7
Q10 If you believe or think that you or someone you know has beensubjected to housing discrimination, please choose the type that bestdescribes it (select all that apply):

Answered: 16 Skipped: 15
Total Respondents: 16
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Refusing,
discouraging...

Discouraging a
person from...

Refusing,
discouraging...

Refusing to
make reasona...

Predatory
lending:...

Other (please
specify)

ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Refusing, discouraging or charging more to rent an apartment or buy a home.

Discouraging a person from living where he/she wants to live. Steering him/her to another apartment, complex or neighborhood.

Refusing, discouraging, making it difficult, charging more or providing less favorable terms on a home loan.

Refusing, discouraging or changing more for home insurance.

Refusing to make reasonable accommodation or not allowing a modification to be made to make an apartment more accessible for a person with a disability.

Predatory lending: unfair, misleading and deceptive loan practices.

Other (please specify)
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY HOUSING SURVEY (2024-29)
11 / 19
Q11 If you experienced housing discrimination: What was the basis of thediscrimination? Answered: 12 Skipped: 19
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Race
Color
Marital Status
National Origin
Gender Identity
Age
Religion
Family Status
(e.g. single...

Disability/Medi
cal Conditions
Sex
Ancestry
Sexual
Orientation
Source of
Income
Other
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY HOUSING SURVEY (2024-29)
12 / 19

8.33% 1

0.00% 0

25.00% 3

0.00% 0

8.33% 1

58.33% 7
TOTAL 12

ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Race
Color
Marital Status
National Origin
Gender Identity
Age
Religion
Family Status (e.g. single parent with children)
Disability/Medical Conditions
Sex
Ancestry
Sexual Orientation
Source of Income
Other
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY HOUSING SURVEY (2024-29)
13 / 19
Q12 If you were a victim of housing discrimination, in what neighborhooddid it occur? Answered: 11 Skipped: 20
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY HOUSING SURVEY (2024-29)
14 / 19

41.94% 13

19.35% 6

29.03% 9

9.68% 3
Q13 Do you feel that you are well-informed on housing discrimination? Answered: 31 Skipped: 0
TOTAL 31
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Yes
No
Somewhat
Not Enough

ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Yes
No
Somewhat
Not Enough
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY HOUSING SURVEY (2024-29)
15 / 19

3.33% 1

63.33% 19

33.33% 10
Q14 What would you do if you encountered housing discrimination? Answered: 30 Skipped: 1
TOTAL 30
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Ignore It
Report It
Don't Know

ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Ignore It
Report It
Don't Know
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY HOUSING SURVEY (2024-29)
16 / 19

19.35% 6

41.94% 13

35.48% 11

3.23% 1
Q15 If you were to report housing discrimination, who would you report itto? Answered: 31 Skipped: 0
TOTAL 31
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
City of Jurupa
Valley
Riverside Fair
Housing Council
Don't Know
Other (please
specify)

ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
City of Jurupa Valley
Riverside Fair Housing Council
Don't Know
Other (please specify)
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY HOUSING SURVEY (2024-29)
17 / 19
Q16 If you think that housing discrimination is occurring, what types ofdiscrimination do you think are the largest problems in Jurupa Valley? Answered: 16 Skipped: 15
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY HOUSING SURVEY (2024-29)
18 / 19
Q17 What can be done to prevent housing discrimination in Jurupa Valley? Answered: 16 Skipped: 15
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY HOUSING SURVEY (2024-29)
19 / 19
Q18 Please provide any additional comments you may have on fairhousing.

Answered: 10 Skipped: 21
Ciudad de Jurupa Valley - Encuesta de Impedimentos de Viviendas (2024-29) 1 / 19
Q1 ¿Cuál es su código postal?
Answered: 1 Skipped: 0
Ciudad de Jurupa Valley - Encuesta de Impedimentos de Viviendas (2024-29) 2 / 19
100.00% 1

0.00% 0
Q2 ¿Usted alquila (renta) o es dueño de su casa?
Answered: 1 Skipped: 0
TOTAL 1
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Dueño
Alquila (renta)

ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Dueño
Alquila (renta)
Ciudad de Jurupa Valley - Encuesta de Impedimentos de Viviendas (2024-29) 3 / 19

0.00% 0
100.00% 1

0.00% 0
Q3 ¿Cuál es su género?
Answered: 1 Skipped: 0
TOTAL 1
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Hombre
Mujer
Otro:

ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Hombre
Mujer
Otro:

Ciudad de Jurupa Valley - Encuesta de Impedimentos de Viviendas (2024-29) 4 / 19

0.00% 0

0.00% 0
100.00% 1

0.00% 0

0.00% 0
Q4 Edad:

Answered: 1 Skipped: 0
TOTAL 1
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
18-24
25-34
35-44
45-54
55-64
65+

ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
18-24
25-34
35-44
45-54
55-64
65+
Ciudad de Jurupa Valley - Encuesta de Impedimentos de Viviendas (2024-29) 5 / 19

0.00% 0

0.00% 0
100.00% 1
Q5 Categorías raciales (seleccione una o más):

Answered: 1 Skipped: 0
TOTAL 1
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Blanco
Afroamericano
Asiático
Amerindio o
Nativo de...

Nativo de
Hawái o de O...

Otra raza (por
favor...

ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Blanco
Afroamericano
Asiático
Amerindio o Nativo de Alaska
Nativo de Hawái o de Otra Isla del Pacífico
Otra raza (por favor especifique):

Ciudad de Jurupa Valley - Encuesta de Impedimentos de Viviendas (2024-29) 6 / 19
100.00% 1

0.00% 0
Q6 Categoría étnicas (seleccione una):

Answered: 1 Skipped: 0
TOTAL 1
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Hispano o
Latino
No Hispano o
Latino

ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Hispano o Latino
No Hispano o Latino
Ciudad de Jurupa Valley - Encuesta de Impedimentos de Viviendas (2024-29) 7 / 19

0.00% 0
100.00% 1
Q7 ¿Tiene alguna discapacidad?
Answered: 1 Skipped: 0
TOTAL 1
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Si
No

ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Si
No
Ciudad de Jurupa Valley - Encuesta de Impedimentos de Viviendas (2024-29) 8 / 19
100.00% 1

0.00% 0
Q8 ¿Tiene niños menores de 18 años en su hogar?
Answered: 1 Skipped: 0
TOTAL 1
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Si
No

ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Si
No
Ciudad de Jurupa Valley - Encuesta de Impedimentos de Viviendas (2024-29) 9 / 19

0.00% 0
100.00% 1

0.00% 0
Q9 ¿Alguna vez ha enfrentado usted o conoce a alguien más que tuvocualquier forma de discriminación en adquirir una vivienda? Answered: 1 Skipped: 0
TOTAL 1
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Si
No
No estoy seguro

ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Si
No
No estoy seguro
Ciudad de Jurupa Valley - Encuesta de Impedimentos de Viviendas (2024-29) 10 / 19
100.00% 1

0.00% 0

0.00% 0
100.00% 1

0.00% 0

0.00% 0
Q10 Si usted cree o piensa que usted o alguien que usted conoce ha sidoobjeto de discriminación en adquirir una vivienda, por favor elija el tipo quemejor describe la discriminación (seleccione todas las que correspondan):

Answered: 1 Skipped: 0
Total Respondents: 1
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Rechazar,
desalentar o...

Desalentar a
una persona ...

Rechazar,
desalentar,...

Rechazar,
desalentar o...

Negar hacer
arreglos...

Préstamos
abusivos:...

Otro (por
favor...

ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Rechazar, desalentar o cobrar más para alquilar (rentar) un apartamento o comprar una casa.

Desalentar a una persona de vivir donde él / ella quiere vivir. Dirigir a él / ella a otro apartamento, complejo o barrio.

Rechazar, desalentar, hacer difícil, cobrar más o proporcionar condiciones menos favorables en un préstamo hipotecario.

Jurupa Valley City CouncilMarch 21, 2024

Jurupa Valley City Council
March 21, 2024