Agenda, regular meeting — Jurupa Valley City Council, February 6, 2025 (part 2 of 3)

4.8.4 Applicable Adopted MND Mitigation Measures

As described in the Adopted MND , impacts related to greenhouse gas emissions were determined to be less than significant and no mitigation measures were identified.

No substantial changes in the environment related to greenhouse gas emissions will occur with the Project modifications that would lead to more significant impacts, and no new mitigation measures are required.

4.8.5 Proposed Project Impact Analysis

To determine the impacts of construction and operations GHG emissions the CalEEMod program was used to model both the approved and proposed projects’ GHG emissions (Appendix A). For GHG emission analysis purposes, GHG construction emissions are amortized over a 30 -year period and added to the total Project’s operational GHG annual emissions. The proposed project’s GHG emissions as indicated in Table 4.8-1 will remain below the City’s screening threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e/year and therefore be less than significant.

The Adopted MND and related implementing actions established goals and policies for development of the Project. Development of the Proposed Project will be constructed in light of the policies of the General Plan, Municipal Code, and the approved Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.

Table 4.8-1: Annual Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Emission Source
Approved Project Total
Emissions (MTCO2e per
year)
Proposed Project Total
Emissions (MTCO2e per
year)
Annual construction-related emissions
amortized over 30 years 18.0 22.9
Area Source 0.60 1.16
Energy Source 118 226
Mobile Source 287 549
Waste 10.0 19.1
Water Usage 10.1 19.4
Refrigerant 0.08 0.15
Total CO2E (All Sources) 443 836.9
Screening Threshold (CO2E) 3,000 3,000
Threshold Exceeded NO No
Source: Appendix A CalEEMod Datasheets

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 31 ends

4.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials

New Potentially
Significant
Impact
New Mitigation
Required Reduced Impact No New Impact
Would the project
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the
environment?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one‐
quarter mile of an existing or proposed school?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code
Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been Adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an Adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
g) Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒

4.9.1 Summary of MND Conclusions

4.9.A & B During construction of the Project contractors are required to comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations regarding hazardous materials, including but not limited requirements imposed by the Environmental Protection Agency, California Department of Toxic Subs tances Control, South Coast Air Quality Management District, and the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board. As such, impacts due to construction activities would not cause a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine t ransport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. A less than significant impact would occur.

Pursuant to State law and local regulations, residents would be required to dispose of household hazardous waste (e.g., batteries, used oil, old paint) at a permitted household hazardous waste collection facility. Accordingly, the Project would not expose people or the environment to significant hazards associated with the disposal of hazardous materials at the Project site. Long -term operation of the Project would not expose the public or the environment to significant hazards associated with the transpor t, use, or disposal of hazardous materials.

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 32 ends

Therefore, impacts related to the construction and operational phases of the proposed project would be less than significant.

4.9.C The Project site is located within one -quarter (0.25) mile of a mile from two existing schools. From the Project site, the nearest schools are Camino Real Elementary School located adjacent to the Project site on the southern property border and the Patrio t High School located northwest across Jurupa Road. The proposed Project is for residential use and not associated with operations that would typically emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous, or acutely hazardous materials. As discussed in the responses to issues 4.9 (A & B), all hazardous or potentially hazardous materials would comply with all applicable federal, state, and local agencies and regulations with respect to hazardous materials. Therefore, regardless of the proximity of planned or proposed schools, the Project will not impact schools.

4.9.D The project site is not located on any hazardous materials list compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5, or other hazardous sites list compiled by federal, state, or local agencies. No impact would occur.

4.9.E The Project site is not located within an airport compatibility zone.

4.9.F Access to the Project site is proposed from Camino Real via Jurupa Road. The Project site does not contain any emergency facilities, nor does it serve as an emergency evacuation route. During construction and long‐term operation, the Project would be required to maintain adequate emergency access for emergency vehicles.

Project development and improvements will not result in a substantial alteration to the design or capacity of any public road that would impair or interfere with the implementation of evacuation procedures.

4.9.G According to the General Plan13, the Project site is not located within a high wildfire hazard area. (Also refer to analysis under Issue 4.20, Wildfire).

4.9.2 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts

There are no unavoidable adverse impacts identified in the Adopted MND .

4.9.3 Applicable General Plan Policies

There are no General Plan Policies identified in the Adopted MND .

13 City of Jurupa Valley, General Plan Safety Element, Figure 8-10: Wildfire Severity Zones in Jurupa Valley.

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 33 ends

4.9.4 Applicable Adopted MND Mitigation Measures

There are no mitigation measures identified in the Adopted MND .

4.9.5 Proposed Project Impact Analysis

The Adopted MND included a review of available federal, state, and local records which did not identify any potential impacts related to hazards or hazardous materials. For the proposed modified Project, a Phase II ESA (Appendix C) was conducted at the request of Riverside County Department of Environmental Health to determine if historical agricultural use on the property and the railroad easement adjacent to the northern boundary of the property to identify potential recognized environmental conditions (RECs). The Phase II ESA concluded that detected concentrations of lead and arsenic in the soils are within regional background levels and as such no further investigations were recommended.

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 34 ends

4.10 Hydrology and Water Quality

New Potentially
Significant
Impact
New Mitigation
Required Reduced Impact No New Impact
Would the project
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or groundwater?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the
basin?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on‐ or off‐site?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
i) result in substantial erosion or siltation on‐ or off‐site; ii) substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on‐ or offsite; iii) create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage
systems or provide substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff; or
iv) impede or redirect flood flows?

d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒

4.10.1 Summary of MND Conclusions

The Approved Project’s Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) found impacts related to Hydrology and Water Quality to be less than significant. The conclusions included are from the IS/MND.

4.10.A Construction of the proposed project would likely result in more than 1 acre of land disturbance, and, therefore, the proposed project would be required to obtain an NPDES permit per PPP 4.10-1, as well as prepare and implement a SWPPP in accordance with the Statewide Construction General Permit that would implement best management practices to reduce stormwater pollutants such as use of filter rolls and detention basins per PPP 4. 10-2. A SWPPP would require implementation of water quality BMPs to ensure th at water quality standards are met and that stormwater runoff from the construction work areas do not cause degradation of water quality in receiving water bodies.

Additionally, PPP 4. 10-3 would ensure compliance with the water quality discharge requirements of the proposed project’s water quality management plan, such as low impact development techniques and bioretention of stormwater on the project site, that are intended to minimize adverse effects to water quality and must be approved by the City prior to the start of construction. As such, the proposed project would not

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 35 ends

violate water quality standards or waste discharge requirements during construction, and impacts would be less than significant.

Implementation of PPP s 4.10-1, 4.10 -2, and 4.10 -3 would ensure that the proposed project would not violate water quality standards or waste discharge requirements during operation, and impacts would be less than significant.

4.10.B The Jurupa Community Service District (JCSD) provided a will-serve letter indicating its availability to provide potable water to the proposed project (refer to Section 4.17, Utilities and Service Systems). Therefore, the proposed project is accounted for by the JCSD, and the proposed project would not contribute to the lowering of the local groundwater table.

4.10.C In the proposed condition, the existing drainage path will drain towards the water quality and underground infiltration basin located at the southwest corner of the site.

During construction, the Project is also required to implement a Stormwater Pollution Control Plan per PPP 4.10-1.

As proposed, the design of the storm drain system will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site; substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or offsite; create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff or impede or redirect flood flows.

4.10.D According to the General Plan 14, the Project site is not located within a flood hazard zone. According to the California Department of Conservation, California Official Tsunami Inundation Maps15, the site is not located within a tsunami inundation zone. In addition, the Project would not be at risk from seiche because there is no water body in the area of the Project site capable of producing as seiche.

4.10.2 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts

There are no unavoidable adverse impacts identified in the Adopted MND .

4.10.3 Applicable General Plan Policies

PPP 4.10-1 As required by Municipal Code Chapter 6.05.050, Storm Water/Urban Runoff Management and Discharge Controls, Section B (1), any person performing construction work in the city shall comply with the provisions of this chapter and shall control storm water runoff so as

14 City of Jurupa Valley, General Plan Figure 8-9: Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM). 15 California Department of Conservation, California Official Tsunami Inundation Maps, https://www.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/tsunami/maps#:~:text=Coordinated%20by%20Cal%20OES%2C%20California,considered%20tsun amis%20for%20each%20area., accessed August 30, 2020.

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 36 ends

to prevent any likelihood of adversely affecting human health or the environment. The City Engineer shall identify the BMPs that may be implemented to prevent such deterioration and shall identify the manner of implementation. Documentation on the effectiveness of BMPs implemented to reduce the discharge of pollutants to the MS4 shall be required when requested by the City Engineer

PPP 4.10-2 As required by Municipal Code Chapter 6.05.050, Storm Water/Urban Runoff Management and Discharge Controls, Section B (2), any person performing construction work in the city shall be regulated by the State Water Resources Control Board in a manner pursuant to and consistent with applicable requirements contained in the General Permit No. CAS000002, State Water Resources Control Board Order Number 2009-0009-DWQ. The city may notify the State Board of any person performing construction work that has a non -compliant construction site per the General Permit.

PPP 4.10-3 As required by Municipal Code Chapter 6.05.050, Storm Water/Urban Runoff Management and Discharge Controls, Section C, n ew development, or redevelopment projects shall control storm water runoff so as to prevent any deterioration of water quality that would impair subsequent or competing uses of the water. The City Engineer shall identify the BMPs that may be implemented to prevent such deterioration and shall identify the manner of implementation. Documentation on the effectiveness of BMPs implemented to reduce the discharge of pollutants to the MS4 shall be required when requested by the City Engineer.

The BMPs may include, but are not limited to, the following and may, among other things, require new developments or redevelopments to do any of the following:

(1) Increase permeable areas by leaving highly porous soil and low-lying area undisturbed by:
(a) Incorporating landscaping, green roofs and open space into the project design; (b) Using porous materials for or near driveways, drive aisles, parking stalls and low volume roads and walkways; and
(c) Incorporating detention ponds and infiltration pits into the project design. (2) Direct runoff to permeable areas by orienting it away from impermeable areas to swales, berms, green strip filters, gravel beds, rain gardens, pervious pavement or other approved green infrastructure and French drains by:
(a) Installing rain-gutters oriented towards permeable areas; (b) Modifying the grade of the property to divert flow to permeable areas and minimize the amount of storm water runoff leaving the property; and (c) Designing curbs, berms, or other structures such that they do not isolate permeable or landscaped areas.
(3) Maximize storm water storage for reuse by using retention structures, subsurface areas, cisterns, or other structures to store storm water runoff for reuse or slow release. (4) Rain gardens may be proposed in -lieu of a water quality basin when applicable and approved by the City Engineer.

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 37 ends

4.10.4 Applicable Adopted MND Mitigation Measures

As described in the Adopted MND , impacts related to hydrology and water quality were determined to be less than significant and no mitigation measures were identified.

No substantial changes in the environment related to hydrology and water quality will occur with the Project modifications that would lead to more significant impacts, and no new mitigation measures are required.

4.10.5 Proposed Project Impact Analysis

As part of the proposed Project review a Preliminary Hydrology Report, Adkan Engineers, February 14, 2024, (Appendix D), and Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan, (WQMP) , Adkan Engineers, December 15, 2023, (Appendix E) were conducted to determine the potential impacts to hydrology and water quality.

According to the Preliminary Hydrology Report the Project site has been designed to capture the 100- year storm flows utilizing underground CMP pipes for infiltration and mitigation. Overflow will be directed to the existing storm drain system located adjacent south of the project, via a proposed new lateral connection.

The Adopted MND and related implementing actions established goals and policies for development of the Project. Development of the Proposed Project will be constructed in light of the policies of the General Plan, Municipal Code, BMPs and the approved Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 38 ends

4.11 Land Use and Planning

New Potentially
Significant
Impact
New Mitigation
Required Reduced Impact No New Impact
Would the project
a) Physically divide an established community? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
b) Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation Adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒

4.11.1 Summary of MND Conclusions

4.11.A The Project is in an area largely characterized by residential development and school use. The Project site is bordered by Jurupa Road to the north, Camino Real to the east, Kirby Drive to the west, and Camino Real Elementary School to the south. As such, the Project will not divide an established community.

4.11.B A General Plan Amendment (GPA) is being proposed to change the designation of this property to Medium Density Residential (MDR) which would allow for development of single-family uses at a density of up to 5 dwelling units per acre. A corresponding change of zone (CZ) is also proposed to reclassify the site as Planned Development (R -4). The proposed Project would implement these new designations through a development plan that consists of 35 lots for single -family detached housing on 6.92 acres (5 units/acre) as shown in the proposed site plan (see previous Figure 3.2, Conceptual Site Plan).

Acceptance of the land use designation change, the proposed project would otherwise not conflict with any applicable goals, objectives, or policies of the City of Jurupa Valley General Plan, the Jurupa Valley Area Plan, or the City of Jurupa Valley Zoning Ordinance.

Additionally, the proposed project would not conflict with any applicable policy documents, including the Western Riverside County MSHCP (see Section 4.4 (f), Biological Resources), SCAQMD’s Air Quality Management Plan (see Section 4. 3, Air Quality), and implementation of SCAG’s 20 20–2045 RTP/SCS (see Section 4. 8(b), Greenhouse Gas Emissions). Furthermore, Section 4. 8, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, demonstrates that the proposed project’s GHG emissions would be below SCAQMD and the City thresholds. Therefore, the proposed project would not conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation Adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating adverse environmental effects. Impacts would be less than significant.

4.11.2 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts

There are no unavoidable adverse impacts identified in the Adopted MND .

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 39 ends

4.11.3 Applicable General Plan Policies

There are no General Plan Policies identified in the Adopted MND.

4.11.4 Applicable Adopted MND Mitigation Measures

As described in the Adopted MND , impacts related to land use and planning were determined to be less than significant and no mitigation measures were identified.

No substantial changes in the environment related to land use and planning will occur with the Project modifications that would lead to more significant impacts, and no new mitigation measures are required.

4.11.5 Proposed Project Impact Analysis

The proposed Project changes to the approved TTM does not result in conflicts with any land use plan, policy, or regulation Adopted to avoid or mitigate an environmental effect, including, but not limited to City of Jurupa General Plan, City of Jurupa Valley Zoning, Western Riverside County MSHCP, SCAQMD Air Quality, Management Plan, and SCAG’s 2020–2045 RTP/SCS and the Santa Ana River Basin Plan.

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 40 ends

4.12 Mineral Resources

New Potentially
Significant
Impact
New Mitigation
Required Reduced Impact No New Impact
Would the project
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒

4.12.1 Summary of MND Conclusions

4.12.A According to the General Plan32 the Project site is located within Mineral Resource Zone (MRZ) 3, which is defined as “Areas containing known or inferred mineral occurrences of undetermined mineral resources significance.” However, no mineral resource extraction activity is known to have ever occurred on the Project site. Accordingly, implementation of the Project would not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value t o the region or the residents of the State of California.

4.12.B The General Plan Open Space, Mineral Resources (OS -MIN) land use designation is intended for mineral extraction and processing and includes areas held in reserve for future mineral extraction and processing. 16 The Project site is delineated as Country Neighborhood (LDR). Therefore, the Project is not delineated on the General Plan, a specific plan, or other land use plan as a locally important mineral resource recovery site.

4.12.2 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts

There are no unavoidable adverse impacts identified in the Adopted MND .

4.12.3. Applicable General Plan Policies

There were no General Plan Policies identified in the Approved Project Adopted MND .

4.12.4 Applicable Adopted MND Mitigation Measures

As described in the Adopted MND , impacts related to mineral resources were determined to be less than significant and no mitigation measures were identified.

16 City of Jurupa Valley, General Plan Land Use Element, p.2-28.

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 41 ends

No substantial changes in the environment related to mineral resources will occur with the Project modifications that would lead to more significant impacts, and no new mitigation measures are required.

4.12.5 Proposed Project Impact Analysis

The area impacted by the proposed Project does not change the boundaries of the site reviewed in the adopted MND and does not contain known or locally essential mineral resources and is not designated by the General Plan as a mineral resource recovery site. Based on an examination of the analysis, findings, and conclusions of the ADOPTED MND , implementation of the proposed modifications would not substantially increase the severity of significant impacts previously identified, nor would new significant impacts related to mineral resources that were not identified in the Adopted MND .

The ADOPTED MND and related implementing actions established goals and policies for development of the Project. Development of the Proposed Project will be constructed in light of the policies of the General Plan, Municipal Code, and the approved Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.

4.13 Noise

New Potentially
Significant
Impact
New Mitigation
Required Reduced Impact No New Impact
Would the project result in:
a) Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project more than standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
b) Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or
groundborne noise levels? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been Adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒

4.13.1 Summary of MND Conclusions

4.13.A With implementation of Mitigation Measures (MM) NOI -1, the Project’s noise impacts will not result in the generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project more than standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies.

4.13.B The closest structure to the Project property line is minimally 100 feet from the property line at the Camino Real School to the south. The estimated construction vibration level from a large bulldozer (worst case scenario) measured at 25 -feet would create a vibration level of 0.089 in/sec and 0.011 at the closet structure, which does not exceed the 0.2 in/sec threshold. Therefore, construction impacts related to groundborne vibration is considered less than significant.

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 42 ends

The proposed Project is for residential uses which do not create significant groundborne vibration impacts. Therefore, operation of the proposed project would not result in exposure of residents to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels, and impacts would be less than significant.

4.13.C The Project consists of single-family residences and will not expose people to excessive aircraft noise. The nearest airports are Flabob Airport, Riverside Municipal Airport, and Ontario International Airport which are 2.3 mi southeast, 3.4 mi south, and 8 .4 mi northwest of the project site, respectively. The future airport noise contours for Flabob Airport and Riverside Municipal Airport based on the Riverside County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission 2004) shows that the project site is outside the 55 dBA CNEL noise contour. Also, the airport noise contour for Ontario International Airport based on the Compatibility Policy Map: Noise Impact Zones from the LA/Ontario International Airport Land Use Compat ibility Plan (City of Ontario 2011) shows that the project site is outside the 60 to 65 dBA CNEL noise contour.

Therefore, the project would not expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels from aircraft operations. Standard building design and construction methods would provide adequate noise attenuation to comply with the indoor noise standard of 45 CNEL and thereby not expose residents of the Project to excessive noise levels.

The project site is not located within the vicinity of any private airstrip. Therefore, the proposed project would not expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels, and no impact would occur.

4.13.2. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts

There are no unavoidable adverse impacts identified in the Adopted MND.

4.13.3 Applicable General Plan Policies

PPP 4.13-1 As required by General Plan Policy NE 3.5, the Project contractors are required to limit commercial construction activities adjacent to or within 200 feet of residential uses to weekdays, between 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m., and limit high -noise-generating construction activities (e.g., grading, demolition, pile driving) near sensitive receptors to weekdays between 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. A note shall be placed on the grading plan(s) noting this requirement.

4.13.4 Applicable Adopted MND Mitigation Measures

As described in the Adopted MND , the following mitigation measure was identified.

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 43 ends

MM-NOI-1 Construction Noise Mitigation. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the following notes be included on grading plans and building plans. Project contractors shall be required to ensure compliance with the notes and permit periodic inspection of the construction site by City of Jurupa Valley staff or its designee to confirm compliance.

These notes also shall be specified in bid documents issued to prospective construction contractors.
“a) Haul truck deliveries shall be limited to between the hours of 6:00am to 6:00pm during the months of June through September and 7:00am to 6:00pm during the months of October through May.
b) Construction contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers, consistent with manufacturers’ standards.
c) All stationary construction equipment shall be placed in such a manner so that emitted noise is directed away from any sensitive receptors adjacent to the Project site.
d) Construction equipment staging areas shall be located the greatest distance between the staging area and the nearest sensitive receptors.”

No substantial changes in the environment related to noise impacts will occur with the Project modifications that would lead to more significant impacts, and no new mitigation measures are required.

4.13.5 Proposed Project Impact Analysis

The Adopted MND identified potential noise impacts due to project construction, traffic, and rail operations. The Project does not propose any changes to the intensity or type of development than what was originally allowed under the Approved Project. Mitigation Measure MM NOI -1 will be imposed on the Proposed Project.

As part of the proposed Project review a Technical Noise Memorandum from LSA dated February 5, 2024 (Appendix F) concluded: that impacts associated with construction noise, construction vibration, aircraft operations, stationary HVAC operations, and off -site vibration would remain the same as the previous analysis. Additionally, the updated off-site traffic noise impact analysis indicated that noise level increase would remain less 1 dBA CNEL and would continue to be less than significant. The proposed project does not result in any new noise or vibration impacts.

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 44 ends

4.14 Population and Housing

New Potentially
Significant
Impact
New Mitigation
Required Reduced Impact No New Impact
Would the project
a) Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing
elsewhere?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒

4.14.1 Summary of MND Conclusions

4.14.A The Project site is located in a developed area of the City and is served by existing water and sewer facilities, gas and electric utilities, and improved roadways. No additional infrastructure will be needed to serve the Project other than connection to infrastructure adjacent to the site.

Based on the California Department of Finance, E-5 Population and Housing Estimates for Cities, Counties, and the State, 2020-2022, the City’s population as of January 1, 2022 is 107,083 with a ratio of persons per household of 3.75. 17 Based on the number of dwelling units times 3.75 persons per dwelling unit, the proposed Project would increase the City’s population by approximately 131 persons assuming all residents came from outside the City. (3.75 persons/du with 35 units). An incre ase of 131 in relation to the current population of 105,384 represents an increase of 0.13 % and would not induce substantial population growth.

4.14.B The Project site consists of undeveloped land. Therefore, implementation of the Project would not displace people or a substantial number of existing housing, nor would it necessitate the construction of replacement housing elsewhere.

4.14.2 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts

There are no unavoidable adverse impacts identified in the Adopted MND.

4.14.3 Applicable General Plan Policies

There were no General Plan Policies identified in the Approved Project Adopted MND.

17 https://dof.ca.gov/forecasting/demographics/estimates/e -5-population-and-housing-estimates-for-cities- counties-and-the-state-2020-2023/

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 45 ends

4.14.4 Applicable Adopted MND Mitigation Measures

As described in the Adopted MND, impacts related to population and housing were determined to be less than significant and no mitigation measures were identified.

No substantial changes in the environment related to population and housing will occur with the Project modifications that would lead to more significant impacts, and no new mitigation measures are required.

4.14.5 Proposed Project Impact Analysis

Based on the California Department of Finance, E-5 Population and Housing Estimates for Cities, Counties, and the State, 2021-2023, the City’s population as of January 1, 2023 is 104,983 with a ratio of persons per household of 3. 66.18 Based on the number of dwelling units times 3. 66 persons per dwelling unit, the proposed Project would increase the City’s population by approximately 245 persons assuming all residents came from outside the City. (3.66 persons/du with 67 units). An increase of 245 in relation to the current population of 104,983 represents an increase of 0.23 % and would not induce substantial population growth.

18 https://dof.ca.gov/forecasting/demographics/estimates/e -5-population-and-housing-estimates-for-cities- counties-and-the-state-2020-2023/

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 46 ends

4.15 Public Services

New Potentially
Significant
Impact
New Mitigation
Required Reduced Impact No New Impact
Would the project
a) Result in substantial adverse physical impacts
associated with the provision of new or physically
altered governmental facilities, need for new or
physically altered governmental facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant
environmental impacts, in order to maintain
acceptable service ratios, response times or other
performance objectives for any of the public services:

1) Fire protection? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
2) Police protection? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
3) Schools? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
4) Parks? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
5) Other public facilities? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒

4.15.1 Summary of MND Conclusions

4.15.A1 Fire Service:

The Riverside County Fire Department provides fire protection services to the Project area. The Project would be primarily served by the Riverside County West Riverside Fire Station No. 18 located approximately 0.5 roadway miles north of the Project site at 7545 Mission Boulevard, Jurupa Valley, CA.

Development of the Project would impact fire protection services by placing an additional demand on existing fire protection resources should its resources not be augmented. To offset the increased demand for fire protection services, the Project would be conditioned by the City to provide a minimum of fire safety and support fire suppression activities, including compliance with State and local fire codes, fire sprinklers, a fire hydrant system, paved access, and secondary access routes.

In addition, as required by the City’s Inter -Agency Project Review Request process, the Project plans were routed to the Fire Department for review and comment on the impacts to providing fire protection services. The Fire Department did not indicate that the Project would result in the need for new or physically altered fire facilities in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives.

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 47 ends

Furthermore, the Municipal Code requires payment of the Development Impact Fee to assist the City in providing for fire protection services. 19 Payment of the Development Impact Fee would ensure that the Project provides fair share funds for the provision of additional public services, including fire protection services, which may be applied to fire facilities and/or equipment, to offset the incr emental increase in the demand for fire protection services that would be created by the Project.

Based on the above analysis, with implementation of PPP 4.14 -1 and PPP 4.14 -2, impacts related to fire protection are less than significant.

4.15.Aii Police Protection:

The Riverside County Sheriff’s Department provides community policing to the Project area via the Jurupa Valley Station located at 7477 Mission Boulevard, Jurupa Valley, CA.

The Project would increase the demand for police protection services. The Municipal Code requires payment of the Development Impact Fee to assist the City in providing for public services, including police protection services 20. Payment of the Development Impact Fee would ensure that the Project provides its fair share of funds for additional police protection services, which may be applied to sheriff facilities and/or equipment, to offset the incremental increase in the demand that would be created by the Project.

In addition, as required by the City’s Inter -Agency Project Review Request process, the Project plans were routed to the Sheriff’s Department for review and comment on the impacts to providing police protection services. The Sheriff’s Department did not indicate that the Project would result in the need for new or physically altered sheriff facilities in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives.

Based on the above analysis, with implementation of PPP 4.15-2, impacts related to police protection are less than significant.

4.15.Aiii Schools:

The proposed project would be required to contribute fees to the School District through the implementation of PPP 4.14 -3. Pursuant to Senate Bill 50, payment of school impact fees constitutes complete mitigation for project-related impacts to school services. Therefore, mandatory payment of school impact fees would reduce the proposed project’s impacts to school facilities to a less -than-significant level, and no mitigation would be required.

4.15.Aiv Parks:

Although the proposed project incorporates recreation and park space for future residents, it would comply with PPP 4.14 -4 that requires the proposed project to

19 City of Jurupa Valley, Municipal Code Chapter 3.75, Development Impact Fee, June 10, 2020. Available at:
https://www.jurupavalley.org/168/Municipal-Code
20 Ibid.

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 48 ends

contribute applicable impact fees per single-family and multi-family residential units to JARPD in accordance with JARPD Park Development Fees (Assembly Bill 1600). Pursuant to Assembly Bill 1600, payments of park impact fees constitute mitigation for project - related impacts to park facilities and services. The refore, mandatory payment of park impact fees would reduce the proposed project’s impacts to parks and recreation facilities to a less-than-significant level, and no mitigation would be required.

4.15.Av Other Public Services:

Pursuant to PPP 4.14 -2 the proposed project would be required to comply with the provisions of the City’s DIF Ordinance, which requires a fee payment to assist the City in providing public services. Payment of the DIF fee would ensure that the proposed project provides fair share of funds for additional public services. These funds may be applied to the acquisition and/or construction of public facilities and/or equipment, including library books and other resources. Mandatory payment of DIF fees would ensure that project-related impacts to library services would be less than significant.

4.15.2 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts

There are no unavoidable adverse impacts identified in the Adopted MND.

4.15.3 Applicable General Plan Policies

PPP 4.15-1 The Project applicant shall comply with all applicable Riverside County Fire Department codes, ordinances, and standard conditions regarding fire prevention and suppression measures relating to water improvement plans, fire hydrants, automatic fire extinguishing systems, fire a ccess, access gates, combustible construction, water availability, and fire sprinkler systems.

PPP 4.15-2 As required by Municipal Code Chapter 3.75, the Project is required to pay a Development Impact Fee that the City can use to improve public facilities and/or, to offset the incremental increase in the demand for public services that would be created by the Project.

PPP 4.15-3 Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the Project Applicant shall pay required development impact fees to the Jurupa Unified School District following protocol for impact fee collection.

PPP 4.15-4 Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the Project Applicant shall pay required park development impact fees to the Jurupa Area Recreation and Park District pursuant to District Ordinance No. 01-2007 and 02-2008.

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 49 ends

4.15.4. Applicable Adopted MND Mitigation Measures

As described in the Adopted MND , impacts related to public services were determined to be less than significant and no mitigation measures were identified.

No substantial changes in the environment related to public services will occur with the Project modifications that would lead to more significant impacts, and no new mitigation measures are required.

4.15.5 Proposed Project Impact Analysis

As noted in the response to Issue 4.14(a), Population and Housing, of this Initial Study, development of the Project would add approximately 245 persons to the population of the City assuming that all new residents come from outside the City limits. This low number of persons in relation to the current population of 104,983 would not significantly increase the demand for public services, including fire, police, public health services, parks, and library services which would require the construction of new or expanded public facilities.

The Municipal Code requires payment of the Development Impact Fee to assist the City in providing for public services. Payment of the Development Impact Fee would ensure that the Project provides fair share of funds for additional public services. These funds may be applied to the acquisition and/or construction of public facilities.21
Based on an examination of the analysis, findings, and conclusions of the Adopted MND , implementation of the proposed modifications would not substantially increase the severity of significant impacts previously identified, nor would new significant impacts related to public services that were not identified in the Adopted MND .

21 Ibid.

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 50 ends

4.16 Recreation

New Potentially
Significant
Impact
New Mitigation
Required Reduced Impact No New Impact
Would the project
a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒

4.16.1 Summary of MND Conclusions

4.16.A Pursuant to PPP 4. 16-1 the proposed project would be required to pay park development impact fees to the Jurupa Area Recreation and Park District that would help maintain and provide park services for the new residents as a result of the proposed project. Therefore, the amount of available parkland and planned parkland included as part of the proposed project would be su fficient for the population increase caused by the proposed project without resulting in deterioration of facilities. Impacts would be less than significant.

4.16.B Potential environmental impacts that result from the recreational facilities included as part of the proposed project would be minimized or avoided to the extent feasible through the implementation of plans, policies, and programs, project design features .

As noted in the response to issue 4.14 (a) Population and Housing the low number of persons potentially added to the population in relation to the City population of 107,083 would not require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse effect on the environment. In addition, no offsite parks or recreational improvements are proposed or required as part of the Project . Therefore, impacts resulting from the adverse physical effects on the environment of the proposed project’s recreational facilities would be less than significant.

4.16.2. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts

There are no unavoidable adverse impacts identified in the Adopted MND .

4.16.3. Applicable General Plan Policies

PPP 4.16-1 Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the Project Applicant shall pay required park development impact fees to the Jurupa Area Recreation and Park District pursuant to District Ordinance No. 01-2007 and 02-2008.

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 51 ends

4.16.4 Applicable Adopted MND Mitigation Measures

As described in the Adopted MND , impacts related to recreation were determined to be less than significant and no mitigation measures were identified.

No substantial changes in the environment related to recreation will occur with the Project modifications that would lead to more significant impacts, and no new mitigation measures are required.

4.16.5 Proposed Project Impact Analysis

The additional units in the proposed Project would potentially increase the population form the approved project by 114 persons. The assessment in the adopted MND was based on an estimated City population of 107,083, whereas the estimated current population is 104,983 this reduction in population would therefore reduce the potential impact on recreation resources. Based on an examination of the analysis, findings, and conclusions of the Adopted MND , implementation of the proposed modifications would not substantially increase the severity of significant impacts previously identified, nor would new significant impacts related to recreation that were not identified in the Adopted MND .

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 52 ends

4.17 Traffic and Circulation

New Potentially
Significant
Impact
New Mitigation
Required Reduced Impact No New Impact
Would the project
a) Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
b) Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines § 15064.3, subdivision (b)? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
d) Result in inadequate emergency access? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒

4.17.1 Summary of MND Conclusions

4.17.A The City is served by transit service by the Riverside Transit Agency (RTA), the closest route to the Project site is Route 49 on Mission Boulevard approximately .44 miles north along Camino real and .75 miles northeast along Jurupa Road.

The Project is not proposing any improvements that would interfere with current transit service or bicycle travel. In addition, the Project will provide adequate pedestrian facilities, including upgrading the existing sidewalks along public streets abuttin g the site, as necessary.

4.17.B VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED (VMT) ANALYSIS
Table 4.17 -1 summarizes the base year citywide average/significant threshold and project VMT per capita. The Project VMT/Capita was estimated utilizing RIVCOM model runs consistent with the methodology recommended in the City’s TIA Guidelines.

Table 4.17-1 Base Year City and Project VMT Summary
City* Project Difference Percentage Difference Significant Impact

21.9 28.1 6.2 28.31 % Yes
Source: Trip Generation and Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis (Adopted MND Appendix I)

Project Significant VMT Impact
As shown above, the proposed Project Average VMT/Capita is 28.31 % above the City average base year VMT/Capita and based on the criteria outlined in this report, the proposed Project exceeds the existing City of Jurupa Valley VMT/Capita and thus has a significant transportation impact.

Cumulative Significant VMT Impact
According to the City of Jurupa Valley Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines (dated August 2020), if a project is consistent with the Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 53 ends

Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS), then the cumulative impacts shall be considered less than significant. Because the proposed Project is not consistent with the RTP/SCS, the cumulative impacts are considered to be significant and, hence, a cumulative analysi s was required and conducted.

Table 4.17 -2 summarizes the citywide average/ significant threshold and the project VMT per capita for the cumulative year.

Table 4.17-2 Cumulative Year City and Project VMT Summary City* Project Difference Percentage Difference Significant Impact

22.5 27.8 5.3 23.55 % Yes
Source: Trip Generation and Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis (Adopted MND Appendix I)

As shown above, the proposed Project Average VMT/Capita for the cumulative year is

23.55 % above the City average VMT/Capita for the cumulative year, resulting in a significant impact.

4.17.C Access to the site is already in place from the roadways abutting the Project site. The Project is proposing the following street improvements that will meet City standards.

Camino Real improvement recommendations include:
• North Bound: One 12 -foot-wide left turn lane, one 12 -foot wide through lane, one 13-foot through lane/right turn lane, and 8-foot shoulder (shoulder not required at intersection with Jurupa Road).
• South Bound: One 13 -foot wide through lane, one 12 -foot wide through lane, and 8-foot shoulder (shoulder not required at intersection with Jurupa Road). • 6-foot-wide raised median for future UPRR gate assembly. • 18-foot-wide west parkway.

In addition, the Project is a located in an area developed with residential and school uses, and as such, would not be incompatible with existing development in the surrounding area to the extent that it would create a transportation hazard because of an incompatible use.

4.17.D The project site plan has been reviewed by the City’s Engineering Department, and CALFIRE to ensure that adequate access to and from the project site would be provided for emergency vehicles. For the reasons stated, it is determined that implementation of the proposed project would have a less than significant impact on emergency access.

4.17.2 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts

There are no unavoidable adverse impacts identified in the Adopted MND.

Table 4.17-3 shows the resulting reductions after application of MM VMT-1, MM-VMT-2 and VMT-3 through VMT-5.

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 54 ends

Table 4.17-3 VMT Reduction:

Mitigation CAPCOA Reference VMT Reduction/VMT
VMT- 1 – Electric Vehicle Charging Stations T-14 3.9 %
VMT-2 – Sidewalks and Pedestrian
Improvements
T-18 0.16 %
Project Design Features
VMT-3 – High Destination Accessibility T-31A 1.0 %
VMT-4 – Traffic Calming & Safety Measures T-35 17.5 %
VMT-5 – Improve Transit (Bus Shelter) T-46 1.0 %
Total VMT Mitigation Reduction 23.56 %
Unmitigated VMT 27.8
Mitigated VMT 21.25
Threshold 22.5
Source: Trip Generation and Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis (Approved MND Appendix I)

With implementation of the recommended mitigation measures, strategies, and Project Design Features, the project VMT is anticipated to decrease to 21.25 miles per capita, which is below the cumulative year City’s threshold of 22.5. Therefore, the project’s impa cts under CEQA for traffic and transportation will be less than significant after mitigation.

4.17.3 Applicable General Plan Policies

There are no General Plan Policies identified in the Adopted MND .

4.17.4 Applicable Adopted MND Mitigation Measures

As described in the analysis below in 4.17.5 Proposed Project Impact Analysis the Adopted MND’ Mitigation Measures for Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMTO are no longer applicable.

4.17.5 Proposed Project Impact Analysis

The proposed Project does not make changes that would create new or more significant impacts for Thresholds 4.17(a), 4.17(c), or 4.17(d)

The Adopted MND determined that the Approved Project would result in significant and unavoidable impacts due to exceeding the VMT thresholds discussed under 4.17(b).

As part of the review of the proposed Project a Trip Generation and Vehicle Miles Traveled Analysis was conducted by LSA (Appendix G). The VMT per capita for the project is 14.5, which is 6.59% less than the City’s threshold. Therefore, since the project is located within a low VMT zone, it is estimated that the project will not have no significant VMT impact and is eligible to be screened out from further VMT Analysis.

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 55 ends

Similar to the baseline scenario, the VMT Tool was run for the cumulative scenario to determine the project VMT per capita in the cumulative scenario the results of this analysis the project is estimated to generate 15.6 VMT per Capita, which is 4.17 percent less than the threshold of 16.3. Therefore, it is estimated that the project will not have any cumulative significant VMT impact and is eligible to be screened out from further VMT Analysis.

Based on an examination of the analysis, findings, and conclusions of the Adopted MND , implementation of the proposed modifications would not substantially increase the severity of significant impacts previously identified, nor would new significant impacts related to transportation that were not identified in the Adopted MND. The amended Project would result in a decrease in impacts related to VMT and as such the VMT Mitigation Measures MM -VMT-1 and MM -VMT-2, and Project Design Features VMT-3, VMT-4, and VMT-5 are not required and are therefore removed form the proposed Project’s MMRP and Conditions of Approval.

The Adopted MND and related implementing actions established goals and policies for development of the Project. Development of the Proposed Project will be constructed in light of the policies of the General Plan, Municipal Code, and the approved Conditions of Approval a nd the Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. Project Transportation impacts would be less than significant.

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 56 ends

4.18 Tribal Cultural Resources

New Potentially
Significant
Impact
New Mitigation
Required Reduced Impact No New Impact
Threshold 4.18 (a) Would the project cause a
substantial adverse change in the significance of a
tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources
Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place,
cultural landscape that is geographically defined in
terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred
place, or object with cultural value to a California
Native American tribe, and that is:

a) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of
historical resources as defined in Public Resources
Code section 5020.1(k)?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
Threshold 4.18 (b) Would the project cause a
substantial adverse change in the significance of a
tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources
Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place,
cultural landscape that is geographically defined in
terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred
place, or object with cultural value to a California
Native American tribe, and that is:

b) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒

4.18.1 Summary of MND Conclusions

4.18.A A record search was conducted at the University of California, Riverside, Eastern Information Center, Riverside, for the Project site. This search included a review of all recorded historic and prehistoric archaeological sites within a one -mile radius of t he Project site. In addition, the California Points of Historical Interest (PHI), the listing of California Historical Landmarks (CHL), the California Register of Historic Resources Inventory (HRI) were checked. Historic maps were also reviewed.

The California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) Eastern Information Center (EIC) indicated that 38 surveys were completed within a one -mile radius of the project site. The EIC records search and literature review revealed 18 cultural resources recorded within one mile of the Project Site. None of the other recorded resources will be impacted by the proposed Project.

The remnants of the structures (residence and shed/bunkhouse) were damaged in a recent fire and as found in the Cultural Resources Assessment While uncommon, the buildings’ methods of construction (adobe with mud-sill floors, various siding materials

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 57 ends

and composition roofing) are not unique and there is no surface indication of associated subsurface deposits. Implementation of Mitigation Measures CR-1 through CR -3 will ensure impacts remain less than significant. Mitigation Measures TCR-1 through TCR-3 will address if any historic cultural resources are also historic tribal cultural resources.

In addition, research failed to identify any National Register of Historic Places properties; no California State Landmarks; no California Register of Historical Resources; nor any California Points of Historical Interest in the immediate vicinity of the Project site.

4.18.B The Planning Department notified the following California Native American Tribes per the requirements of AB52:

• Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation
• Soboba Band Luiseño Indians
• San Manuel Band of Mission Indians
• Torres Martinez Band of Cahuilla Indians.
• Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians

As a result of the SB-18 and AB-52 consultation process, mitigation measures TCR-1 through TCR-3 are required.

4.18.2 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts

There are no unavoidable adverse impacts identified in the Adopted MND .

4.18.3 Applicable General Plan Policies

There were no GP Policies identified in the Approved Project Adopted MND .

4.18.4 Applicable Adopted MND Mitigation Measures

As described in the Adopted MND , the following mitigation measure s were identified. Red Text is added as a result of Addendum #1 to the Adopted MND.

MM- TCR-1 Native American Monitoring Agreement. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Permit Applicant shall enter into a Monitoring Agreement with the Consulting Tribe(s) for Native American Monitor(s) to be onsite during ground disturbing activities allowed by the grading permit. A Consultin g Tribe is defined as a tribe that initiated the AB 52 tribal consultation process for the Project, has not opted out of the AB 52 consultation process, and has completed AB 52 consultation with the City as provided for in Public Resources Code §21080.3.1( b). Ground disturbing activities and include excavation of each portion of the project site including clearing, grubbing, tree removals, grading and trenching.

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 58 ends

The Monitoring Agreement shall include, but is not limited to, the following provisions:
a) Provide a minimum of 30 days advance notice to the Consulting Tribe(s) of all ground disturbing activities.
b) In conjunction with the Archaeological Monitor(s) required by Mitigation Measure CR -1 under Section 4.5, Cultural Resources, of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for MA21347 and Addendum #1 to the MND MA23357, the Native American Monitor(s) shall have the authority to temporarily divert, redirect, or halt the ground disturbance activities to allow identification, evaluation, and potential recovery of cultural resources.
c) The onsite monitoring shall end when all ground -disturbing activities on the Project Site are completed, or when the Native American Tribal Monitor(s) have indicated that all upcoming ground disturbing activities at the Project Site have little to no potential for impacting Tribal Cultural Resources.

The Project Proponent shall submit a fully executed copy of the Monitoring Agreement to the City of Jurupa Valley Planning Department to ensure compliance with this mitigation measure. If there are multiple Consulting Tribes involved, a separate Monitoring Agreement is required for each. The Monitoring Agreement shall not modify any condition of approval or mitigation measure.

MM-TCR-2 Unanticipated Discovery: The Permit Applicant or any successor in interest shall comply with the following for the life of the grading permit. If, during ground disturbance activities, unanticipated cultural resources are discovered, the following procedures shall be followed:

a) Ground disturbing activities shall cease in the immediate vicinity of the find (not less than the surrounding 100 feet) until the find can be assessed. Ground disturbing activities are allowed on the remainder of the Project Site. b) The Consulting Tribe(s), the Project Archaeologist (retained by the Permit Applicant under Mitigation Measure CR-1, Retain Professional Archaeologist, of this Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration document for MA21143 and Addendum #1 to the MND MA23357 ), and the City of Jurupa Valley Community Development Department shall meet and confer, and discuss the find with respect to the following:

1. Determine if the resource is a Tribal Cultural Resource as defined by Public Resources Code §21074, if so:

2. Determine if the resource is listed or eligible for listing in the California Register on a “Local register of historical or resources” pursuant to Public Resources Code §5020.1 (k); or

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 59 ends

region, or method of construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values, or (4) Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history.
b) If the resource(s) are Native American in origin [and not a historical resource as defined by Public Resources Code §5020.1 (k) or §5024.1 (c)], the Consulting Tribe will retain it/them in the form and/or manner the Consulting Tribe (s) deems appropriate, for educational, cultur al and/or historic purposes. If multiple Consulting Tribes (s) are involved, and a mutual agreement cannot be reached as to the form and manner of disposition of the resource(s), the City shall request input from the Native American Heritage Commission and render a final decision. c) If the resource(s) is both a tribal cultural resource and a historic resource, the Project Archaeologist, the Consulting Tribe (s), and the City of Jurupa Valley Planning Department shall meet and confer and discuss the appropriate treatment (documentation, recovery, avoidance, etc.) for the cultural and historic resource.

Treatment, at a minimum, shall be consistent with Public Resources Code § 21084.3 (b). The appropriate treatment shall be prepared in conjunction with the Archaeological Treatment plan re quired by Mitigation Measure CR -2 of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for MA21143 and Addendum #1 to the MND MA23357. Further ground disturbance shall not resume within the area of the discovery until the appropriate treatment has been accomplished.

MM-TCR-3: Final Report: If a Tribal cultural resource is also a historic resource defined above, the resource shall be included in the Final Report required by Mitigation Measure CR -2 of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for MA21143 and Addendum #1 to the MND MA23357.

4.18.5 Proposed Project Impact Analysis

Development of the Proposed Project will have no new impact to Tribal Cultural resources . The Adopted MND found that the affected area is located within a traditional use area for Native Americans and as such, mitigation measures will be implemented to required, per consultations the Native American Tribes.

The proposed Project would be subject to the mitigation measures identified in the Adopted MND.

With the implementation of these Mitigation Measures, impacts related to Tribal Cultural Resources would be less than significant.

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 60 ends

4.19 Utilities and Service Systems

New Potentially
Significant
Impact
New Mitigation
Required Reduced Impact No New Impact
Would the project:
a) Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water
drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during
normal, dry, and multiple years?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
c) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
d) Generate solid waste more than State or local standards, or more than the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
e) Comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒

4.19.1 Summary of MND Conclusions

4.19. A Water Service
The Project will connect to the existing water service available from both the existing 18-inch waterline in Camino Real, an existing 8-inch waterline in Kirby Drive, or existing 12-inch and 24-inch waterlines north of Jurupa Road.

Sewer Service
The Project will connect to the existing sewer service available from the existing 8 -inch diameter line in Kirby Road.

Storm Drainage Improvements
Drainage for the Project will consist of storm drains, catch basins, and an underground water quality and infiltration basin. The site drains from the northeast to the southwest through the proposed storm drain lines and conveyed to the water quality and infiltration basin located in the southeast corner of the project site. High flows will be conveyed through an existing storm drain located along the southern boundary of the property.

Electric Power Facilities
The Project will connect to the existing Southern California Edison electrical distribution facilities available in the vicinity of the Project site.

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 61 ends

Natural Gas Facilities
The Project will connect to the existing Southern California Gas natural gas distribution facilities available in the vicinity of the Project site.

Telecommunication Facilities
Telecommunication facilities include a fixed, mobile, or transportable structure, including, all installed electrical and electronic wiring, cabling, and equipment, all supporting structures, such as utility, ground network, and electrical supporting structures, and a transmission pathway and associated equipment in order to provide cable TV, internet, telephone, and wireless telephone services to the Project site.

Services that are not provided via satellite will connect to existing facilities maintained by the various service providers.

4.19.B Water service would be provided to the Project site by Jurupa Community Services District (JCSD). JCSD has estimated the Project’s water demand at 23.3 ac.ft./year. JCDS issued a Water and Sewer Will Serve Letter (Adopted MND Appendix G) stating that the District's current water supply has sufficient capacity to meet its long -term current customers' needs per the 2015 Urban Water Management Plan, and its short -term current customers' needs and that of the proposed development a s shown in Figure

4.19.1, Jurupa Community Services District Supply vs Maximum Day Demand, 2019 - 2024.

JCDS issued Water and Sewer Will Serve Letter ( Adopted MND Appendix G) states that water service is available from both the existing 18 -inch waterline in Camino Real, an existing 8-inch waterline in Kirby Drive, or existing 12-inch and 24-inch waterlines north of Jurupa Road.

4.19.C Wastewater treatment service would be provided to the Project site by Jurupa Community Services District (JCSD). JCSD has estimated the Project’s wastewater demand at 0.0076 MGD (millions of gallons per day). JCDS issued a Water and Sewer Will Serve Letter (Appendix G) states that existing sewer service is available from the existing 8-inch diameter line in Kirby Road. In addition, JCSD maintains 4 MGD capacity rights in the City of Riverside Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant facilities, which will expand to 5 MGD in the year 2030.

4.19.D PPP 4.19-1 applies to the Project and would reduce impacts relating to solid waste. This measure will be included in the Project’s Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.

The California Green Building Standards Code (“CAL Green’), requires all newly constructed buildings to prepare a Waste Management Plan and divert construction waste through recycling and source reduction methods. The City of Jurupa Valley Building and Saf ety Department reviews and approves all new construction projects required to submit a Waste Management Plan. Mandatory compliance with CAL Green solid waste requirements as required by PPP 4.19-1 will ensure that construction waste impacts are less than significant.

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 62 ends

Based on solid waste generation usage obtained from the Project’s Summary of CalEEMod Model Runs and Output (Adopted MND Appendix A), the Project would generate approximately 17 tons of solid waste per year or 0.05 tons per day. The Project’s solid waste generation will add a minimal amount of additional solid waste of the remaining capacity of the Badlands Sanitary Landfill or the El Sobrante Sanitary Landfill. As such, the Project is not anticipated to cause these landfills to ex ceed their remaining capacities.

4.19.E PPP 4.19-1 applies to the Project and would reduce impacts relating to solid waste. This measure will be included in the Project’s Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.

The City compels its waste hauler to comply with Assembly Bill 341 (Chapter 476, Statutes of 2011), as amended by Senate Bill 1018, which became effective July 1, 2012, by providing the necessary education, outreach and monitoring programs and by processing the solid waste from the City’s residential customers through its waste hauler’s material recovery facility. The Project would be required to coordinate with the waste hauler to develop collection of recyclable materials for the Project on a common schedule as set forth in applicable local, regional, and State programs.

4.19.2 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts

There are no unavoidable adverse impacts identified in the Adopted MND .

4.17.3 Applicable General Plan Policies

PPP 4.19-1 Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Project applicant shall submit a construction waste management plan in compliance with Section 4.408 of the 2013 California Green Building Code Standards

4.19.4 Applicable Adopted MND Mitigation Measures

As described in the Adopted MND , impacts related to wildfire were determined to be less than significant and no mitigation measures were identified.

No substantial changes in the environment related to wildfire will occur with the Project modifications that would lead to more significant impacts, and no new mitigation measures are required.

4.19.5 Proposed Project Impact Analysis

On March 25, 2024, t he JCDS issued Water and Sewer Will Serve Letter (Appendix H) for water and sewer service for the proposed Project. O ther utility systems and services impacts would continue to have a less than significant impact. Based on an examination of the analysis, findings, and conclusions of the Adopted MND, implementation of the proposed modifications would not substantially increase

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 63 ends

the severity of significant impacts previously identified, nor would new significant impacts related to utilities and service systems that were not identified in the Adopted MND.

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 64 ends

4.20 Wildfire

New Potentially
Significant
Impact
New Mitigation
Required Reduced Impact No New Impact
Would the project
a) Is the project located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard
severity zones?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒

4.20.1 Summary of MND Conclusions

4.20.A A wildfire is a nonstructural fire that occurs in vegetative fuels, excluding prescribed fire.

Wildfires can occur in undeveloped areas and spread to urban areas where the landscape and structures are not designed and maintained to be ignition resistant. As stated in the State of California’s General Plan Guidelines: “ California’s increasing population and expansion of development into previously undeveloped areas is creating more ’wildland -urban interface’ issues with a corresponding increased risk of loss to human life, natural resources, and economic assets associate d with wildland fires .” To address this issue, the state passed Senate Bill 1241 to require that General Plan Safety Elements address the fire severity risks in State Responsibility Areas (SRAs) and Local Responsibility Areas (LRAs).

According to General Plan Figure 8 -11, Wildfire Severity Zones in Jurupa Valley, the Project site is not located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones.

4.20.2 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts

There are no unavoidable adverse impacts identified in the Adopted MND .

4.20.3 Applicable General Plan Policies

There are no General Plan Policies identified in the Adopted MND .

4.20.4 Applicable Adopted MND Mitigation Measures

As described in the Adopted MND, impacts related to wildfire were determined to be less than significant and no mitigation measures were identified.

No substantial changes in the environment related to wildfire will occur with the Project modifications that would lead to more significant impacts, and no new mitigation measures are required.

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 65 ends

4.20.5 Proposed Project Impact Analysis

The proposed Project site will remain in an area not located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones. The additional units proposed by the Project will therefore not exacerbate the risk of wildfire.

5.0 CONCLUSION

The proposed Project, would not result in any new significant environmental impacts, substantially increase the severity of previously identified effects, or necessitate implementation of additional or considerably different mitigation measures than those identified in the Adopted MND. The effects associated with the Modified Project would be substantially the same as those reported for the Adopted MND , and thus no supplemental or subsequent MND is required.

As described in the Environmental Checklist in Section 4.0 and based on an examination of the analysis, findings, and conclusions of the Adopted MND , implementation of the proposed project modifications would not substantially increase the severity of significant impacts previously identified, nor would new significant impacts related to environmental impacts that were not identified in the Adopted MND .

Page M-1

MITIGATION MONITORING REPORTING PROGRAM

Red text is text added and Red Text Strike-thru is text removed as a result of MA23357 Amendment to TTM 38151, and Addendum No. 1 to the Adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration (MA21143).

PROJECT NAME: MA 21143 Madone Collections Residential Project (Tentative Tract Map No. 38151) MA 23357 Amendment to TTM 38151 Addendum No. 1 to the Adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration (MA21143)

DATE: September 08, 2022, July 31, 2024

PROJECT MANAGER: Thomas Gorham, Principal Planner Miguel Del Rio, Senior Planner

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Project proposes a General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation from LDR (Country Neighborhood) to MDR (Medium Density Residential), a change of zone (CZ) from A-1 (Light Agriculture) to R-4 (Planned Development) and a tentative tract map to subdivide 6.92 acres into 35 lots for single -family detached houses. The Project will include recreational area park, dog park, walking trails, exercise stations, tot lot, Gazebo and BBQ areas, and sitting areas. The R-4 zone allows for lot sizes of a minimum overall site area of 6,000 square- feet for each dwelling unit and a minimum lot area of 3,500 square-feet.

The Modified Project proposes modifications to the approved TTM and increase the number of lots to 67 lots for single -family detached houses. The Project is requesting the density increase per the State Density Bonus Law which would provide for a density b onus of 20 percent. 1 The Project’s density of 67 residential units represents a density bonus of 16 percent. The approved GPA and CZ will not be changed by the modified Project.

The proposed Project will include recreational area park, dog park, tot lot, Gazebo and BBQ areas, and sitting areas. The proposed Project lot sizes of a minimum overall site area of 2,498 square - feet and a maximum of 5,044 square-feet with an average of 2,974.6 square-feet.

PROJECT LOCATION: The Project is located on the south of Jurupa Road, east of Kirby Street, west of Camino Real and north Camino Real Elementary School. Assessor’s Parcel No. 183-030-014.

1 State Density Bonus Law Request Letter for 7586 Jurupa Road Project dated June 30, 2023, included as Appendix A.

Page M-2

Throughout this Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program , reference is made to the following:

• Plans, Policies, or Programs (PPP) − These include existing regulatory requirements such as plans, policies, or programs applied to the Project based on the basis of federal, state, or local law currently in place which effectively reduce environmental impacts. • Mitigation Measures (MM) − These measures include requirements that are imposed where the impact analysis determines that implementation of the proposed Project would result in significant impacts; mitigation measures are proposed in accordance with the requirements of CEQA.

Any applicable Plans, Policies, or Programs (PPP) were assumed and accounted for in the assessment of impacts for each issue area. Mitigation Measures were formulated only for those issue areas where the results of the impact analysis identified significant impacts. All three types of measures described above will be required to be implemented as part of the Project.

Page M-3

MITIGATION MEASURE (MM)

PLANS, POLICIES, OR PROGRAMS (PPP)

RESPONSIBILITY
FOR

IMPLEMENTATION
TIME

FRAME/MILESTONE

VERIFIED
BY:

AESTHETICS
PPP 4.1 -1 As required by Jurupa Valley Municipal
Code section 9.100.050, development plan (called
R-4 Development Plan) that includes, but is not
limited to, development standards for structures,
pedestrian walks, recreation and other open areas,
walls, landscaping, and plans and elevations of
typical structures to indicate architectural type and
construction standards.

Planning
Department
Prior to the
issuance of building
permits

PPP 4.1 -2 As required by Jurupa Valley Municipal
Code section 7.50.010, all utilities serving and
within the Project site shall be placed underground
unless exempted by this section.

Planning
Department
Prior to the
issuance of
occupancy permits

PPP 4.1-3 All outdoor lighting shall be designed and
installed to comply with California Green Building
Standard Code Section 5.106 or with a local
ordinance lawfully enacted pursuant to California
Green Building Standard Code Section 101.7,
whichever is more stringent.

Planning
Department
Prior to the
issuance of building
permits

AIR QUALITY
PPP 4.3-1 The Project is required to comply with the
provisions of South Coast Air Quality Management
District Rule 403, “Fugitive Dust.” Rule 403 requires
implementation of best available dust control
measures during construction activities that
generate fugitive dust, such as earth moving and
stockpiling activities, grading, and equipment travel
on unpaved roads.

Public Works and
Engineering
Department
During grading
PPP 4.3-2 The Project is required to comply with the
provisions of South Coast Air Quality Management
District Rule 1186 “PM10 Emissions from Paved and
Unpaved Roads and Livestock Operations” and Rule
1186.1, “Less‐Polluting Street Sweepers.”
Adherence to Rules 118 6 and 1186.1 reduces the
release of criteria pollutant emissions into the
atmosphere during construction.

Building & Safety
Department
During construction
PPP 4.3-3 The Project is required to comply with the
provisions of South Coast Air Quality Management
District Rule 402 “ Nuisance.” Adherence to Rule
402 reduces the release of odorous emissions into
the atmosphere.

Building & Safety
Department
Engineering
Department
Planning
Department
During construction
and on-going

Page M-4

MITIGATION MEASURE (MM)

PLANS, POLICIES, OR PROGRAMS (PPP)

RESPONSIBILITY
FOR

IMPLEMENTATION
TIME

FRAME/MILESTONE

VERIFIED
BY:

PPP 4.3-4 The Project is required to comply with the
provisions of South Coast Air Quality Management
District Rule 402 “ Nuisance.” Adherence to Rule
402 reduces the release of odorous emissions into
the atmosphere.

Planning
Department
On-going

BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
PPP 4.4-1 The Project is required to pay mitigation
fees pursuant to the Western Riverside County
Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan
(MHSCP) as required by Municipal Code Chapter

3.80. Planning
Department
Prior to the
issuance of a
grading permit

MM- BIO-1: Pre -Construction Burrowing Owl
Survey / Burrowing Owl Protection . A 30-day pre-
construction survey for burrowing owls is required
prior to future ground -disturbing activities (e.g.,
vegetation clearing, clearing and grubbing, tree
removal, site watering, equipment staging, etc.) to
ensure that no owls have colonized the site in the
days or weeks preceding the ground -disturbing
activities. If burrowing owls have colonized the
project site prior to the initiation of ground -
disturbing activities, the pr oject proponent will
immediately inform the RCA and the Wildlife
Agencies and will need to coordinate in the future
with the RCA and the Wildlife Agencies, including
the possibility of preparing a Burrowing Owl
Protection and Relocation Plan, prior to init iating
ground disturbance. If ground -disturbing activities
occur, but the site is left undisturbed for more than
30 days, a pre -construction survey will again be
necessary to ensure that burrowing owl have not
colonized the site since it was last disturbed . If
burrowing owls are found, the same coordination
described in MM-BIO-1 will be necessary.

Planning
Department
Prior to the
issuance of a
grading permit

MM- BIO-2: Nesting Bird Protection. As feasible,
vegetation clearing should be conducted outside of
the nesting season, which is generally identified as
February 1 through August 31. If avoidance of the
nesting season is not feasible, then a qualified
biologist shall conduct a nesting bird survey within
three days prior to any disturbance of t he site,
including disking, vegetation grubbing, and grading.

If active nests are identified, the biologist shall
establish suitable buffers around the nests, and the
buffer areas shall be avoided until the nests are no
longer occupied and the juvenile bir ds can survive
independently from the nests.

Planning
Department
Prior to the
issuance of a
grading permit

Page M-5

MITIGATION MEASURE (MM)

PLANS, POLICIES, OR PROGRAMS (PPP)

RESPONSIBILITY
FOR

IMPLEMENTATION
TIME

FRAME/MILESTONE

VERIFIED
BY:

COS 1.2 Protection of Significant Trees. Protect and
preserve significant trees, as determined by the City
Council upon the recommendation of the Planning
Commission. Significant trees are those trees that
make substantial contributions to natural habitat or
to the urban landscape due to their s pecies, size, or
rarity. In particular, California native trees should be protected. mature native and non-native trees, and
other features of ecological, aesthetic, and
conservation value.

• Open Space Policy 9.3 - Maintain and
conserve superior examples of native
trees, natural vegetation, stands of
established trees, and other features for
ecosystem, aesthetic, and water
conservation purposes.
• Open Space Policy 9.4 - Conserve the oak
tree resources within in the County (i.e.

City).

These policies are meant to preserve the, continued
viability of habitat communities within the City. The
single coast live oak ( Quercus agrifolia) tree onsite
is a California native tree species endemic to
Southern California.

The County of Riverside has published Oak Tree
Management Guidelines, March 2, 1993 which the
City has adopted upon incorporation and apply to
oak woodlands. Although the tree is not considered
an oak woodland, the guidance provided in the
Guidelines can be used as a basis for mitigating
impacts to the tree even though it is not considered
oak woodlands because impacts to individual trees
are discussed in the Guidelines.

Planning
Department
Prior to the
issuance of a tree
removal or grading
permit

MM-BIO-3.Dedication of Open Space Lot and Tree
Maintenance. If the tree is to be preserved, prior to
the recordation of the Final Map, a lettered or
numbered lot shall be provided for the tree to be
preserved. This lot shall be dedicated to the City in
order to allow for continued maintenance of the
tree(s) the City or approved maintenance entity as
follows:
• Construction of a wrought iron fence is
necessary positioned just outside of the
dripline around the tree to reduce the risk
of injury in the event of failure.

Planning
Department
Prior to the
issuance of a tree
removal or grading
permit

Page M-6

MITIGATION MEASURE (MM)

PLANS, POLICIES, OR PROGRAMS (PPP)

RESPONSIBILITY
FOR

IMPLEMENTATION
TIME

FRAME/MILESTONE

VERIFIED
BY:
• Landscape design must integrate the
existing oak tree on site in a way that
diverts excess water runoff or irrigation
from accumulating and pooling within the
tree's dripline. This final design must be
reviewed by a certified landscape architect
and approved by the Planning Manager.
• Strategic crown thinning to reduce loading
on the stem. Heavier pruning of coast live
oaks should occur during July -August and
not more than 25% of the crown can be
removed during any single year. All
pruning should be performed or directed
by an Internati onal Society of
Arboriculture (ISA) Certified Arborist or
Tree Worker in accordance with the Best
Management Practices for Pruning by the
International Society of Arboriculture,
2002 and adhere to the most recent
editions of the American National
Standards Institute (ANSI) for Tree Care
Operations Z133.1 and Pruning A300. Any
oak tree maintenance activity onsite
should be done at the direction of an ISA
Certified Arborist or American Society of
Consulting Arborists (ASCA) Registered
Consulting Arborist.
• Oak tree pruning must be kept to a
minimum (except initially as described in
Item 4 above); it typically involves
removing dead or diseased wood,
hazardous branches, or limb structures
and providing clearance.
• Pruning should be done early during
branch development to avoid cuts greater
than 4 inches in diameter. The smaller
wound size will reduce the chance of
infection.
• Excessive and injurious pruning is defined
as the removal of more than 25 percent of
the functioning leaf, stem, or root system
of a tree in any 24-month period.
• Disinfected pruning tools must be used at
all times and in between trees to reduce

Page M-7

MITIGATION MEASURE (MM)

PLANS, POLICIES, OR PROGRAMS (PPP)

RESPONSIBILITY
FOR

IMPLEMENTATION
TIME

FRAME/MILESTONE

VERIFIED
BY:
the spread of sudden oak death and other
contagious diseases.
• Annual surveys by a certified arborist are
recommended once the development is
completed.

MM-BIO-4. Oak Tree Replacement: Prior to the
issuance of any tree removal or the issuance of a
grading permit, the oak tree shall be replaced as
follows:
• Coast Live Oak Tree: Replacement by
five, 15-gallon trees (5:1 ratio) of the
same species at the discretion of the
City's Planning Manager.

Planning
Department
Prior to the
issuance of a tree
removal or grading
permit

CULTURAL RESOURCES
PPP 4.5-1 The project is required to comply with the
applicable provisions of California Health and Safety
Code §7050.5 as well as Public Resources Code
§5097 et. seq.

Public Works and
Engineering
Department
Prior to the issuance
of grading permits
and during
construction

MM- CR-1: Archaeological Monitoring. Prior to
issuance of grading permits, the Permit Applicant
shall provide evidence to the City of Jurupa Valley
Community Development Department that a
qualified professional archaeologist (Professional
Archaeologist) that is listed on the City of Jurupa
Valley Cultural Resources Consultant List or the
Cultural Resource Consultant List maintained by the
County of Riverside Planning Department, has been
contracted to implement Archaeological Monitoring
for the area of impact for the Project. Monitoring
shall be conducted in coordination with the
Consulting Tribe(s), defined as a Tribe that initiated
the tribal consultation process for the Project as
provided for in Public Resources Code §21080.3.1(b)
(“AB52”) and has not opted out of the AB 52
consultation process, and has completed AB 52
consultation with the City. Monitoring shall address
the details of all ground -disturbing activities and
provides procedures that must be followed to avoid
or reduce potential impacts on cultural,
archaeological, and tribal cultural resources to a
level that is less than significant.

A fully executed copy of the Archaeological
Monitoring Agreement shall be provided to the City
of Jurupa Valley Planning Department to ensure
Planning
Department
Prior to the issuance
of a grading permit,
the complete text of
MM CR -1 shall be
placed on the
grading plan.

Page M-8

MITIGATION MEASURE (MM)

PLANS, POLICIES, OR PROGRAMS (PPP)

RESPONSIBILITY
FOR

IMPLEMENTATION
TIME

FRAME/MILESTONE

VERIFIED
BY:
compliance with this measure. If the resource is
significant, Mitigation Measure CR‐2 shall apply.

MM- CR-2: Archaeological Inadvertent Discovery .

The Project Archaeologist shall prepare and
implement a treatment plan to protect the
identified archaeological resource(s) from damage
and destruction. The treatment plan shall be per
CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f) for historical
resources and Public Resources Code § 21083.2(b)
for unique archaeological resources. Preservation
in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of
treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible,
treatment may in clude implementing
archaeological data recovery excavations to
remove the resource and subsequent laboratory
processing and analysis. If historic Native American
tribal cultural resources are involved, the
Treatment Plan shall be coordinated with the
Consulting Native American Tribe(s) as described in
Mitigation Measure TCR -1 through TCR -3 of the
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for
MA21143 and Addendum #1 to the MND MA23357.

Public Works and
Engineering
Department
Planning
Department
Prior to the issuance
of a grading permit,
the complete text of
MM CR -2 shall be
placed on the
grading plan.

MM- CR-3: Final Report : A final report containing
the significance and treatment findings shall be
prepared by the Project Archaeologist and
submitted to the City of Jurupa Valley Community
Development Department and the Eastern
Information Center, University of California,
Riverside. If a historic tribal cultural resource is
involved, a copy shall be provided to the Consulting
Native American Tribe(s) as described in Mitigation
Measure TCR -1 through 3 of the Initial
Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for MA21143
and Addendum #1 to the MND MA23357.

Public Works and
Engineering
Department
Planning
Department
Prior to the issuance
of a grading permit,
the complete text of
MM CR -3 shall be
placed on the
grading plan.

GEOLOGY AND SOILS
PPP 4.7 -1 As required by Municipal Code Section

8.05.010, the Project is required to comply with the
most recent edition of the California Building Code
to preclude significant adverse effects associated
with seismic hazards.

Building & Safety
Department
Prior to the
issuance of building
permits

PPP’s 4.10 -1 through PPP 4.10 -3 in Section 4.10,
Hydrology and Water Quality shall apply.

Engineering
Department
Prior to the
issuance of a
grading permit and
during operation

Page M-9

MITIGATION MEASURE (MM)

PLANS, POLICIES, OR PROGRAMS (PPP)

RESPONSIBILITY
FOR

IMPLEMENTATION
TIME

FRAME/MILESTONE

VERIFIED
BY:

MM-GEO-1: Paleontological Monitoring.

Prior to the issuance of grading permits, a qualified
Paleontologist shall be retained to conduct
monitoring as necessary during ground -disturbing
activities such as vegetation removal, grading, and
other excavations related to the project. The
Paleontologist shall be present at the pre -grade
conference and shall establish a schedule for
paleontological resource surveillance based on the
nature of planned activities. The Paleontologist
shall establish, in cooperation with the lead agency,
procedures for tem porarily halting or redirecting
work, if any is ongoing, to permit the sampling,
identification, and evaluation of cultural resources
as appropriate. If the paleontological resources are
found to be significant, the Paleontologist/Monitor
shall determine appropriate actions, in cooperation
with the lead agency, for exploration and/or
salvage. Significant sites that cannot be avoided will
require data recovery measures and shall be
completed upon approval of a Data Recovery Plan.

Panning
Department
Prior to the issuance
of a grading permit,
the complete text of
MM GEO -1 shall be
placed on the
grading plan.

MM-GEO-2: Paleontological Treatment Plan Prior
to the issuance of grading permits, a qualified
paleontologist shall be retained to observe ground-
disturbing activities and recover fossil resources as
necessary when construction activities will impact
the older Quaternary Alluvium. The Paleontolo gist
will attend the pre -grade conference and establish
procedures and protocols for paleontological
monitoring and to temporarily halt ground -
disturbing activities to permit sampling, evaluation,
and recovery of any discovery. Substantial
excavations belo w the uppermost layers (more
than 3 feet below surface) should be monitored.

Sediment samples should be recovered to
determine the small-fossil potential of the site. If a
discovery is determined to be significant, additional
excavations and salvage of the fossil may be
necessary to ensure that any impacts to it are
mitigated to a less than significant level.

Public Works and
Engineering
Department
Planning
Department
Prior to the issuance
of a grading permit,
the complete text of
MM GEO -2 shall be
placed on the
grading plan.

GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
PPP 4.8-1 Prior to issuance of a building permit, the
Project Applicant shall submit plans showing that
the Project will be constructed in compliance with
the most recently adopted edition of the applicable
California Energy Code, (Part 6 of Title 24 of the
California Code of Regulations) and the California
Building & Safety
Department
Prior to the
issuance of building
permits

Page M-10

MITIGATION MEASURE (MM)

PLANS, POLICIES, OR PROGRAMS (PPP)

RESPONSIBILITY
FOR

IMPLEMENTATION
TIME

FRAME/MILESTONE

VERIFIED
BY:

Green Building Standards Code, 2019 Edition (Part
11 of Title 24 of the California Code of
Regulations).

PPP 4.8 -2 As required by Municipal Code Section

9.283.010, Water Efficient Landscape Design
Requirements, prior to the approval of landscaping
plans, the Project proponent shall prepare and
submit landscape plans that demonstrate
compliance with this section.

Building & Safety
Department
Prior to the
issuance of building
permits

HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY
PPP 4.10 -1 As required by Municipal Code Chapter

6.05.050, Storm Water/Urban Runoff Management and
Discharge Controls, Section B (1), any person performing construction work in the city shall comply with the
provisions of this chapter, and shall control storm water runoff so as to prevent any likelihood of adversely
affecting human health or the environment. The City
Engineer shall ident ify the BMPs that may be
implemented to prevent such deterioration and shall
identify the manner of implementation. Documentation
on the effectiveness of BMPs implemented to reduce
the discharge of pollutants to the MS4 shall be required when requested by the City Engineer.

Public Works and
Engineering
Department
Prior to the
issuance of
grading permits

PPP 4.10 -2 As required by Municipal Code Chapter

6.05.050, Storm Water/Urban Runoff Management and
Discharge Controls, Section B (2), any person performing construction work in the city shall be regulated by the State Water Resources Control Board in a manner
pursuant to and consistent with applicable
requirements contained in the General Permit No.

CAS000002, State Water Resources Control Board Order
Number 2009-0009-DWQ. The city may notify the State
Board of any person performing construction work that
has a non -compliant construction site per the General
Permit.

Public Works and
Engineering
Department
Prior to the
issuance of
grading permits
and during
construction

PPP 4.10 -3 As required by Municipal Code Chapter

6.05.050, Storm Water/Urban Runoff Management and
Discharge Controls , Section C , n ew development, or
redevelopment projects shall control storm water
runoff so as to prevent any deterioration of water
quality that would impair subsequent or competing uses
of the water. The City Engineer shall identify the BMPs that may be implemented to prevent such deterioration
and shall identify the manner of implementation.

Public Works and
Engineering
Department
Prior to the
issuance of
grading permits
and during
operation

Page M-11

Documentation on the effectiveness of BMPs
implemented to reduce the discharge of pollutants to
the MS4 shall be required when requested by the City
Engineer. The BMPs may include, but are not limited to, the following and may, among other things, require new
developments or redevelopments to do any of the
following:
(1) Increase permeable areas by leaving highly porous
soil and low-lying area undisturbed by:
(a) Incorporating landscaping, green roofs and open
space into the project design;
(b) Using porous materials for or near driveways,
drive aisles, parking stalls and low volume
roads and walkways; and
(c) Incorporating detention ponds and infiltration
pits into the project design.
(2) Direct runoff to permeable areas by
orienting it away from impermeable areas to
swales, berms, green strip filters, gravel beds,
rain gardens, pervious pavement or other
approved green infrastructure and French
drains by:
(a) Installing rain -gutters oriented towards
permeable areas;
(b) Modifying the grade of the property to
divert flow to permeable areas and minimize
the amount of storm water runoff leaving the
property; and
(c) Designing curbs, berms, or other structures
such that they do not isolate permeable or
landscaped areas.
(3) Maximize storm water storage for reuse by
using retention structures, subsurface areas,
cisterns, or other structures to store storm
water runoff for reuse or slow release.
(4) Rain gardens may be proposed in -lieu of a
water quality basin when applicable and
approved by the City Engineer.

NOISE
MM - NOI-1-Construction Noise Mitigation. Prior to the
issuance of a grading permit, the following notes be
included on grading plans and building plans. Project
contractors shall be required to ensure compliance with the notes and permit periodic inspection of the
Planning
Department
Prior to the
issuance of a
grading permit

Page M-12

construction site by City of Jurupa Valley staff or its designee to confirm compliance. These notes also shall
be specified in bid documents issued to prospective
construction contractors.
a) Haul truck deliveries shall be limited to between the hours of 6:00am to 6:00pm during the months of June
through September and 7:00am to 6:00pm during the
months of October through May.
b) Construction contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers, consistent with manufacturers’
standards.
c) All stationary construction equipment shall be placed in such a manner so that emitted noise is directed away from any sensitive receptors adjacent to the Project site. d) Construction equipment staging areas shall be
located the greatest distance between the staging area
and the nearest sensitive receptors.”

PUBLIC SERVICES
PPP 4.15-1 The Project applicant shall comply with all
applicable Riverside County Fire Department codes,
ordinances, and standard conditions regarding fire
prevention and suppression measures relating to water
improvement plans, fire hydrants, automatic fire
extinguishing systems, fire access, access gates,
combustible construction, water availability, and fire
sprinkler systems.

Fire Department Prior to issuance
of a building
permit or
occupancy
permit as
determined by
the Fire
Department

PPP 4.15-2 As required by Municipal Code Chapter 3.75,
the Project is required to pay a Development Impact Fee that the City can use to improve public facilities and/or, to offset the incremental increase in the demand for
public services that would be created by the Project.

Building & Safety
Department
Per Municipal
Code Chapter

3.75 PPP45.15-3 Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the Project Applicant shall pay required development
impact fees to the Jurupa Unified School District
following protocol for impact fee collection.

Building & Safety
Department
Prior to the
issuance of
building permits

PPP 4.15-4 & 4.16-1 Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the Project Applicant shall pay required park
development impact fees to the Jurupa Area Recreation
and Park District pursuant to District Ordinance No. 01 - 2007 and 02-2008.

Page M-13

RECREATION
PPP 4.16-1 Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the Project Applicant shall pay required park
development impact fees to the Jurupa Area Recreation
and Park District pursuant to District Ordinance No. 01 - 2007 and 02-2008.

Building & Safety
Department
Prior to the
issuance of
building permits

TRANSPORTATION
MM-VMT-1: Electrical Vehicle Charging: Prior to the
issuance of a building permit, construction
drawings/plans shall include Level 2 electric vehicle
charging plugs in at least 50% of the proposed 35 units.

Public Works and
Engineering
Department
Prior to the
issuance of
grading permits
and during
operation

MM-VMT-2: Sidewalk Connections: Prior to the
issuance of a building permit, street improvement plans shall show sidewalks within the development that
connect to the existing sidewalk to the south on Camino Real and to the existing crosswalks at Jurupa Road.

Public Works and
Engineering
Department
Prior to the
issuance of
grading permits
and during
operation

VMT-3: High Destination Accessibility: Benefit to
walking distance to area schools and Mission Boulevard
transit corridor
Public Works and
Engineering
Department
Prior to the
issuance of
grading permits
and during
operation

VMT-4: Traffic Calming and Safety Measures: Provide
for the placement/refreshing of high -visibility
crosswalks at 5 locations determined by the City.

Public Works and
Engineering
Department
Prior to the
issuance of
grading permits
and during
operation

VMT-5: Improve Transit (Bus Shelter): Provide one (1)
bus shelter along Mission Boulevard. Location to be
determined by City and RTA.

Public Works and
Engineering
Department
Prior to the
issuance of
grading permits
and during
operation

TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES
MM- TCR-1: Native American Monitoring Agreement .

Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Permit
Applicant shall enter into a Monitoring Agreement with
the Consulting Tribe(s) for Native American Monitor(s)
to be onsite during ground disturbing activities allowed by the grading permit. A Consulting Tribe is defined as a tribe that initiated the AB 52 tribal consultation process for the Project, has not opted out of the AB 52
consultation process, and has completed AB 52
consultation with the City as provided for in Pub lic
Resources Code §21080.3.1(b). Ground disturbing
activities and include excavation of each portion of the project site including clearing, grubbing, tree removals, grading and trenching.

Planning Department

Prior to the
issuance of a
grading permit

Page M-14

The Monitoring Agreement shall include, but is
not limited to, the following provisions:
a) Provide a minimum of 30 days
advance notice to the Consulting
Tribe(s) of all ground disturbing
activities.
b) In conjunction with the
Archaeological Monitor(s) required
by Mitigation Measure CR -1 under
Section 4.5, Cultural Resources, of
the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative
Declaration for MA21347 and
Addendum #1 to the MND
MA23357, the Native American
Monitor(s) shall have the authority
to temporarily divert, redirect, or
halt the ground disturbance
activities to allow identification,
evaluation, and potential recovery
of cultural resources.
c) The onsite monitoring shall end
when all ground -disturbing
activities on the Project Site are
completed, or when the Native
American Tribal Monitor(s) have
indicated that all upcoming ground
disturbing activities at the Project
Site have little to no po tential for
impacting Tribal Cultural
Resources.

The Project Proponent shall submit a fully
executed copy of the Monitoring Agreement to
the City of Jurupa Valley Planning Department
to ensure compliance with this mitigation
measure. If there are multiple Consulting
Tribes involved, a separate Monitorin g
Agreement is required for each. The
Monitoring Agreement shall not modify any
condition of approval or mitigation measure.

MM-TCR-2: Unanticipated Discovery: The Permit
Applicant or any successor in interest shall comply with the following for the life of the grading permit. If, during ground disturbance activities, unanticipated cultural
resources are discovered, the following procedures
shall be followed:
a) Ground disturbing activities shall cease in the
immediate vicinity of the find (not less than the
surrounding 100 feet) until the find can be
Planning Department
Engineering
Department
Prior to the
issuance of a
grading permit

Page M-15

assessed. Ground disturbing activities are
allowed on the remainder of the Project Site.
b) The Consulting Tribe(s), the Project
Archaeologist (retained by the Permit
Applicant under Mitigation Measure CR -1,
Retain Professional Archaeologist, of this
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
document for MA21143 and Addendum #1 to
the MND MA23357 ), and the City of Jurupa
Valley Community Development Department
shall meet and confer, and discuss the find with
respect to the following:

1. Determine if the resource is a Tribal
Cultural Resource as defined by Public
Resources Code §21074, if so:

2. Determine if the resource is listed or
eligible for listing in the California Register
on a “Local register of historical or
resources” pursuant to Public Resources
Code §5020.1 (k); or

3. Pursuant to Public Resources Code §
5024.1 (c) as it pertains to the Consulting
Tribe(s): (1) Is associated with events that
have made a significant contribution to the
broad patterns of California’s history and
cultural heritage, (2) Is associated with the
lives of persons important in our past, (3)
Embodies the distinctive characteristics of
a type, period, region, or method of
construction, or represents the work of an
important creative individual, or possesses
high artistic values, or (4) Has yielded, or
may be likely to yield, information
important in prehistory or history.

c) If the resource(s) are Native American in origin
[and not a historical resource as defined by
Public Resources Code §5020.1 (k) or §5024.1
(c)], the Consulting Tribe will retain it/them in
the form and/or manner the Consulting Tribe
(s) deems appropriate, for educational,
cultural and/or historic purposes. If multiple
Consulting Tribes (s) are involved, and a
mutual agreement cannot be reached as to
the form and manner of disposition of the
resource(s), the City shall request input from
the Native American Heritage Commission
and render a final decision.

Page M-16

d) If the resource(s) is both a tribal cultural
resource and a historic resource, the Project
Archaeologist, the Consulting Tribe (s), and
the City of Jurupa Valley Planning Department
shall meet and confer and discuss the
appropriate treatment (documentation,
recovery, avoidance, etc.) for the cultural and
historic resource. Treatment, at a minimum,
shall be consistent with Public Resources Code
§ 21084.3 (b). The appropriate treatment shall
be prepared in conjunction with the
Archaeological Treatment plan required by
Mitigation Measure CR-2 of the Initial
Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for
MA21143 and Addendum #1 to the MND
MA23357. Further ground disturbance shall
not resume within the area of the discovery
until the appropriate treatment has been
accomplished.

MM - TCR-3: Final Report: If a Tribal cultural resource is also a historic resource defined above, the resource
shall be included in the Final Report required by
Mitigation Measure CR -2 of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for MA21143 and Addendum #1
to the MND MA23357.

Planning Department

Prior to the
issuance of a
grading permit

UTILITY AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
PPP 4.19-1 The Project shall comply with Section 4.408
of the 2013 California Green Building Code Standards,
which requires new development projects to submit
and implement a construction waste management plan
in order to reduce the amount of construction waste
transported to landfills.

Building & Safety
Department
Prior to the
issuance of
building permits

ATTACHMENT NO. 1
Exhibit B Conditions of Approval
JURUPA 67 DENSITY BONUS SUBDIVISION (TTM38888, SDP23172) FEBRUARY 6, 2025 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MA23357
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XXXX

Page 1 of 14 ends

EXHIBIT A

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

1. PROJECT PERMITTED . MA23357 (TTM38888, SDP23172 , and D B24001) is an approval to subdivide 6.92 acres into sixty-seven (67) single-family lots, three (3) open space recreation lots, one (1) detention basin, five (5) private streets, and three (3) private alleys at 7586 Jurupa Road (APN:183-030-014). The proposed project includes a density bonus application for a density bonus of twelve (12) bonus units , one incentive/concession, and waivers of development standards per State Density Bonus Law.

2. INDEMNIFY CITY. The applicant, the property owner or other holder of the right to the development entitlement(s) or permit(s) approved by the City for the project, if different from the applicant (herein, collectively, the “Indemnitor”), shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City of Jurupa Valley and its elected city council, its appointed boards, commissions, and committees, and its officials, employees, and agents (herein, collectively, the “Indemnitees”) from and against any and all claims, liab ilities, losses, fines, penalties, and expenses, including without limitation litigation expenses and attorney’s fees, arising out of either (i) the City’s approval of the project, including without limitation any judicial or administrative proceeding initiated or maintained by any person or entity challenging the validity or enforceability of any City permit or approval relating to the project, any condition of approval imposed by City on such permit or approval, and any finding or determination made and any other action taken by any of the Indemnitees in conjunction with such permit or approval, including without limitation any action taken pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), or (ii) the acts, omissions, or operations of the Inde mnitor and the directors, officers, members, partners, employees, agents, contractors, and subcontractors of each person or entity comprising the Indemnitor with respect to the ownership, planning, design, construction, and maintenance of the project and the property for which the project is being approved. The City shall notify the Indemnitor of any claim, lawsuit, or other judicial or administrative proceeding (herein, an “Action”) within the scope of this indemnity obligation and request that the Indemnitor defend such Action with legal counsel reasonably satisfactory to the City. If the Indemnitor fails to so defend the Action, the City shall have the right but not the obligation to do so and, if it does, the Indemnitor shall promptly pay the City’s full cost thereof. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the indemnity obligation under clause (ii) of the first sentence of this condition shall not apply to the extent the claim arises out of the willful misconduct or the sole active negligence of the City.

3. CONSENT TO CONDITIONS. Within thirty (30) days after project approval, the owner or designee shall submit written consent to the required conditions of approval to the Community Development Director or designee.

4. FEES. The approval of MA23357 (TTM38888, SDP23172, & DB24001) shall not become effective until all planning fees have been paid in full.

5. MITIGATION MEASURES. This project shall be subject to, and comply with, all of the mitigation measures set forth in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program in connection with the adoption of a n Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project.

JURUPA 67 DENSITY BONUS SUBDIVISION (TTM38888, SDP23172) FEBRUARY 6, 2025 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MA23357
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XXXX

Page 2 of 14 ends

6. INCORPORATE CONDITIONS . Prior to the issuance of any building permit , the owner or designee shall include within the first four pages of the working drawings a list of all conditions of approval imposed by the project’s final approval.

7. APPROVAL PERIOD – Tentative Tract Map. Tentative Tract Map (TTM3 8888) shall expire 36 months after such approval unless, within that period of time, a final map shall have been approved and filed with the County Recorder. Prior to the expiration date, the land divider may apply in writing for an extension of time pursuant to Title 7 (Subdivisions) of the J.V.M.C. If the tentative map expires before the recordation of the final map, or any phase thereof, no recordation of the final map, or any phase thereof, shall be permitted.

8. CONFORMANCE TO APPROVED EXHIBITS . The project shall be in conformance to the approved plans (listed below) as amended by these conditions in accordance to these conditions of approval:
a. Tentative Tract Map No. 3 8888: prepared by Adkan Engineers (dated: July 17, 2024)
b. Preliminary Landscape Plan/ Wall and Fence Plan prepared by BMLA Landscape Architecture (dated: June 25, 2024)
c. Neighborhood Development Plan prepared by Warmington Residential (dated June 3, 2024)
d. Conceptual Grading Plan prepared by Adkan Engineers (dated: July 17, 2024

9. LANDSCAPING. Consistent with Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Section 9.240.55(E)(13), each lot shall provide one (1) thirty -six (36) inch box tree in the front yard and the rear yard setback area of each lot shall provide landscaping. Each lot shall provide landscaping to cover ninety (90) percent of the lot’s open space.

10. OWNERSHIP AND MAINTENANCE OF COMMON AREA. Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall be approved by the Community Development Director and City Engineer. The CC&Rs shall be recorded concurrently with the final map or prior to the recordation of the final map, providing for maintenance of the property in perpetuity. The CC&Rs shall, at a minimum, include provisions for the following items unless it is deemed unnecessary by the Community Development Director:
a. Formation of a Permanent Organization for the ownership and maintenance of all common areas including, but not limited to, landscaping, open space, common recreation, common parking areas, and circulation systems (areas) in perpetuity. b. The CC&Rs shall identify the common areas for ownership and maintenance. The common areas shall include the following applicable items:
i. Access and circulation areas
ii. Drainage facilities
iii. Reciprocal access
iv. Private and/or public utility easements
v. Identify common areas (including tot lots, recreational areas, etc.) vi. Allowed users of common areas
vii. Landscaping and Irrigation
JURUPA 67 DENSITY BONUS SUBDIVISION (TTM38888, SDP23172) FEBRUARY 6, 2025 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MA23357
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XXXX

Page 3 of 14 ends

viii. On-site lighting fixtures
ix. Walls and fences
x. Community signage
xi. All on-site storm water and water quality management post -construction facilities and features (BMPs) shall require maintenance by the property owner(s). Regulations for operations and maintenance shall be clearly stated in the CC&Rs
xii. Other items the Community Development Director and City Engineer deem appropriate

11. PROJECT DESIGN APPROVALS. Prior to issuance of the first building permit for a model home or dwelling uni t, whichever occurs first , the following plans shall be approved consistent with the approved Neighborhood Development Plan:
a. Final Site (Plotting) Plan for Dwellings and Model Homes. b. Architectural Styles for Dwellings and Model Homes.
c. Neighborhood Entry Statements (monument signs)
d. Wall and Fence Plan (Includes elevations, color, and materials) e. Traffic calming signage plan for City evaluation and approval (proposed signage to slow traffic on private streets to ensure safety for pedestrians and other vehicles within the subdivision).
f. Review of model homes (architectural styles and floor plans) g. Mailboxes (includes elevations, color, and materials) A PROS application with related fees shall be submitted to the Planning Division for the review of Items a-g.

12. MAINTENANCE OF PROPERTY. The project site shall be maintained as required by the CC&R’s and these Conditions of Approval . Property owners and/or tenants of each property shall maintain the lot and be kept free of debris, weeds, abandoned vehicles, code violations, and any other factor or condition that may contribute to potential blight or crime.

13. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE. All landscaped areas shall be maintained as approved on the final landscape plans in an orderly, attractive and healthy condition. This shall include proper pruning, mowing of turf areas, weeding, removal of litter, fertilization, replacement of plants wh en necessary, and the regular application of appropriate quantities of water to all landscaped areas. Irrigation systems shall be maintained as approved on the final landscape plans in proper operating condition. Waterline breaks, head/emitter ruptures, overspray or runoff conditions and other irrigation system failures shall be repaired immediately. The applicant shall maintain canopy trees in a manner that they provide the required shade coverage and encourages the canopy to grow to provide shade. Avoid topping trees or pruning the trees in a manner that the trees do not achieve mature height and form.

14. UNDERGROUNDING OF DRAINAGE. Driveway and parking areas shall not incorporate center swales, ribbon gutters, concrete valleys, etc. All drainage in common and private use areas shall be underground and shall not incorporate open gutters or swales.

JURUPA 67 DENSITY BONUS SUBDIVISION (TTM38888, SDP23172) FEBRUARY 6, 2025 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MA23357
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XXXX

Page 4 of 14 ends

15. BACKFLOW DEVICES. The location of all backflow devices shall be approved by the City prior to installation. Backflow devices shall be located to be minimally visible from the public right of way.

16. PLANNING REVIEW OF GRADING PLANS . Prior to the issuance of any grading permit, the permit shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development

17. ON-SITE LANDSCAPING. The following items shall be approved by the Community Development Director, including landscape and irrigation plans as modified in accordance with this condition prior to the issuance of the first building permit of the subdivision:
a. Complete “Professional Services (PROS)” application (Planning) for the review of the final landscape, irrigation, and shading plans.
b. Initial deposit for PROS application.
c. The total cost estimate of landscaping, irrigation, labor, and one-year maintenance. d. Completed “City Faithful Performance Bond for Landscape Improvements” form with original signatures after the City provides the applicant with the required amount of bond. This bond is for landscaping not within publicly maintained areas.

A performance bond shall be posted at 110% of the total cost estimate of landscaping, irrigation, labor, and one -year main tenance. The Community Development Director may consider a cash bond if appropriate. e. Completed City Agreement for Landscape Improvements
f. Three (3) sets of final on-site landscape, irrigation plans, shading plan with digital copies in 8.5” x 11” that shall address all of the following requirements:
i. Compliance with Chapter 9.283 Water Efficien t Landscape Design Requirements
ii. Consistent with the approved conceptual plans
Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for each home the following events shall be satisfied in the order it is listed:
iii. Substantial Conformance Letter : The Landscape Architect of Record shall conduct an inspection and submit a letter to the City of Jurupa Valley Community Development Department once the landscape architect has deemed the installation is in conformance to the approved plans. iv. City Inspection: The City landscape architect shall conduct an inspection of the installation to confirm the landscape and irrigation plan was constructed in accordance to the approved plans.

Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for the final home the following events shall be satisfied for common space landscaping, in the order it is listed:
vi. Substantial Conformance Letter : The Landscape Architect of Record shall conduct an inspection and submit a letter to the City of Jurupa Valley Community Development Department once the landscape architect has deemed the installation is in conformance to the approved plans.

JURUPA 67 DENSITY BONUS SUBDIVISION (TTM38888, SDP23172) FEBRUARY 6, 2025 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MA23357
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XXXX

Page 5 of 14 ends

vii. City Inspection: The City landscape architect shall conduct an inspection of the installation to confirm the landscape and irrigation plan was constructed in accordance to the approved plans.

18. MODEL HOME ON-SITE LANDSCAPING. In the event that model homes are proposed to be constructed, the following must be approved and/or executed prior to the issuance of any building permits for model homes:
a. Landscape and irrigation plans
b. Landscape agreement and performance bond if the Director deems it necessary

19. EV CHARGING STATIONS. Each home shall be provided with the infrastructure for a minimum of one (1) electric vehicle (EV) charging station. EV charging station plans shall be approved by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of the first building permit for a residential unit of the development project.

20. OUTDOOR LIGHTING. All outdoor lighting fixtures shall be maintained in good condition.

Light fixtures shall be shielded to prevent any light to flood onto adjacent properties. A photometric plan and exhibits of lighting fixtures shall be approved by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of the first building permit for a residential unit of the development project.

21. UTILITY METERS. Utility meters and equipment related to the utility meters affixed to the exterior walls of buildings shall be painted to match the surface that they are mounted to.

22. GRAFFITI PROTECTION FOR WALLS. Plans that include anti -graffiti coating or protection for the exterior side of all perimeter walls and exterior of building walls to half the height of the structure, or 12 feet, whichever is greater, shall be approved by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of any building permit.

The removal of any graffiti on the property shall occur as soon as possible but no later than within 24 hours of the City’s notice.

23. TRASH COLLECTION.
a. Prior to issuance of building permits , the applicant shall prepare a Waste Service Plan for review and approval by the City and the City's franchise waste hauler. The service plan shall identify the location of all carts (trash, mixed recyclables, and green waste) staged for collection. Carts are 26" wide and should be spaced approximately 12" apart.
b. An approval or clearance letter making reference to the Waste Service Plan from the waste collection agency shall be submitted to the Community Development Department prior to the issuance of any building permit.

24. IMPACT FEES. The applicant shall the pay the following impact fees (unless exempt) in accordance to Title 3 of the Municipal Code:
a. Development Impact Fee (DIF) Program. The applicant shall pay any owed DIFs by the required deadline pursuant to Chapter 3.75 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code.
b. Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Mitigation (MSHCP) Fee. The applicant shall pay any owed MSHCP fees by the required deadline pursuant to Chapter 3.80 of the Municipal Code.

JURUPA 67 DENSITY BONUS SUBDIVISION (TTM38888, SDP23172) FEBRUARY 6, 2025 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MA23357
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XXXX

Page 6 of 14 ends

c. Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program. The applicant shall show proof of payment of TUMF fees by the required deadline pursuant to Chapter

3.70 of the Municipal Code.

25. INCLUSIONARY HOUSING.
a. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the following documents shall be approved under a “Professional Services” application:
i. Site Plan showing the location of inclusionary units within the development. ii. In accordance with the Density Bonus Law (Government Code Sections 65915 to 65918), an Affordability Agreement shall be approved for all affordable units by the Director of Community Development and the City Attorney.
b. Prior to or concurrently with the recordation of the final map, the Affordability Agreement shall be recorded.
c. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the following documents shall be approved under a “Professional Services” application:
i. Marketing Plan.
ii. Inclusionary Housing Plan.

26. JURUPA AREA RECREATION AND PARK DISTRICT (JARPD). Prior to the issuance of any building permit , the applicant shall submit proof of satisfying any fees, dedications, or requirements by the Jurupa Area Recreation and Park District to the Building Official.

27. JARPD CFD. Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall annex into the existing Jurupa Area Recreation and Park District (JARPD) District -Wide Community Facilities District (CFD) or form a new Community Facilities District (CFD) to pay for park maintenance.

28. SALE OF INDIVIDUAL BUILDINGS. No structure constructed on Project site may be sold until the subject Project on which the structure is located is divided and a final map recorded in accordance with the City’s subdivision regulations such that the structure is located on a separate legally divided parcel.

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

29. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS (ENGINEERING)

29.1. The use hereby conditioned is for a Schedule “A” subdivision, Tentative Tract No. 38888(TTM38888); being a subdivision of a portion of Lot 4 as shown by map of subdivisions of a portion of Jurupa Rancho, in Book 9, Page 26, of Maps, Records of San Bernardino County, California; more particularly Assessor’s Parcel Number 183 - 030-014; containing 6.88 acres gross. The following exhibit is hereby referenced:

Tentative Tract Map No. 38888, prepared by Adkans Engineers and dated July 10, 2024 and Conceptual Grading Plans for TTM38888, prepared by Adkans Engineers and dated July 10, 2024.

29.2. The Tract Map preparation shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act, the City of Jurupa Valley Municipal Code, and Riverside County Ordinance No.

JURUPA 67 DENSITY BONUS SUBDIVISION (TTM38888, SDP23172) FEBRUARY 6, 2025 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MA23357
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XXXX

Page 7 of 14 ends

460; as it pertains to Schedule “A” subdivision, unless otherwise modified by the conditions listed herein.

29.3. It is expected that the tentative map and site plan exhibits are all inclusive of a parcel or parcels of land legally subdivided in compliance with the Subdivision Map Act, and local ordinance.

29.4. It is expected that any easements shown on the referenced exhibits are shown correctly and include all the easements that encumber the subject property. The Applicant shall secure approval from all (if any) easement holders for all grading and improvements which are proposed over the respective easement or provide evidence that the easement has been relocated, quitclaimed, vacated, abandoned, easement holder cannot be found, or is otherwise of no affect. Should such approvals or alternate action regarding t he easements not be provided, the Applicant may be required to amend or revise the permit.

29.5. Improvements such as landscaping, streetlights, and other street infrastructure within the dedicated private right -of-way as shown on the referenced exhibit shall be maintained by a Homeowner’s Association (HOA) .

30. PRIOR TO GRADING PERMIT (ENGINEERING)

30.1. In compliance with Jurupa Valley Municipal Code, Chapter 8.70, no grading permit shall be issued until the Tentative Tract Map (TTM) and all other planning permits associated with MA23357 are approved and are in effect.

30.2. All grading shall conform to the California Building Code, as adopted by the City of Jurupa Valley, the City’s Municipal Code Title 8, and all other relevant laws, rules, and regulations governing grading in the City of Jurupa Valley and state of Californi a.

Grading shall be performed in accordance with the recommendations of the approved project specific geotechnical report. Grading p lans shall be approved by the City Engineer and financial securities for grading, if applicable, shall be in place prior to permit issuance.

30.2.1. Prior to approval of the precise grading plan, the Applicant shall prepare a project-specific geotechnical report for review and appro val of the City Engineer for TTM38888.

30.3. The Applicant shall prepare a precise grading plan for the project site.

30.3.1. The grading plan shall be prepared under the supervision of a civil engineer licensed in the state of California (Project Civil Engineer) and he/she must sign the plan. The printed name and contact information of the Project Civil Engineer shall be included on the face of the grading plan. The grading plan shall be approved by the City Engineer.

30.3.2. The grading plan shall provide for acceptance and proper disposal of all off - site drainage flowing onto or through the site. Should the quantities of flow exceed the capacity of the conveyance facility, the Applicant shall provide adequate drainage facilities and/or appropriate easement(s), if necessary, as approved by the City Engineer.

JURUPA 67 DENSITY BONUS SUBDIVISION (TTM38888, SDP23172) FEBRUARY 6, 2025 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MA23357
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XXXX

Page 8 of 14 ends

30.3.3. The grading plan shall provide for protection of downstream properties from damages caused by alteration of the drainage patterns, i.e., concentration or diversion of flow. Protection shall be provided by constructing adequate drainage facilities including enlarging existing facilities and/or by securing a drainage easement(s), if necessary, as approved by the City Engineer.

30.3.4. Temporary erosion control measures shall be implemented immediately following rough grading to prevent transport and deposition of earthen materials onto downstream/downwind properties, public rights -of-way, or other drainage facilities. Erosion Control Plans showing these measures shall be submitted along with the grading plan for approval by the City Engineer.

30.3.5. Applicant shall provide written proof and authorization from easement holders (if any) for work proposed over easements.

30.4. If grading is required offsite, the Applicant shall obtain a written notarized letter of authorization from the property owner(s) to grade as necessary and provide a copy to the Engineering Department. It shall be the sole responsibility of the Applicant to obtain any and all proposed or required easements and/or authorizations necessary to perform the grading shown on the site plan and grading exhibits.

30.5. A hauling permit shall be required for the import/export of material using City streets .

The import/export location and the haul route shall be reviewed and approved by the Engineering Department. If the import/export location is outside of City limits , the Applicant shall provide evidence that the jurisdictional agency has provided all necessary approvals for import/export to/from the site.

30.6. Prior to approval of the rough grading plan, the Applicant shall prepare a final hydrology and hydraulics report corresponding with the detailed plans for grading, site development, storm drain improvements, and street improvements, including analysis of offsite drainage tributary to the site, for approval of the City Engineer. The Cit y has reviewed the Preliminary Hydrology Report for TTM 38888, prepared by Adkan Engineers and dated February 14, 2024.

30.6.1. The final hydrology report shall include a flood impact analysis for post development conditions to identify any special considerations for drainage and grading for the proposed units near the RCFC&WCD facility south of the site.

30.6.2. The final hydrology report shall include runoff mitigation for Kirby Drive. Runoff for Kirby Drive shall be directed away from property to the west.

30.7. Prior to the approval of the precise grading plan, the Applicant shall prepare, or cause to be prepared, a Final Water Quality Management Plan (F -WQMP) for TTM38888 in conformance with the requirements of RCFC&WCD for the Santa Ana River Watershed for approval of the City Engineer.

30.7.1. The F-WQMP shall provide any changes in pervious/impervious areas and BMPs.

JURUPA 67 DENSITY BONUS SUBDIVISION (TTM38888, SDP23172) FEBRUARY 6, 2025 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MA23357
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XXXX

Page 9 of 14 ends

30.7.2. The F-WQMP shall be in accordance with the recommendations of the Final Geotechnical Report.

30.7.3. Any onsite and offsite BMPs shall be designed and sized per the findings of the F-WQMP. Any changes to the proposed BMP sizing, design, and type; and impacts to the referenced exhibit(s), may require additional approvals.

30.8. Post-construction water quality surface features and facilities shall be designed and installed per approved project -specific WQMP and approved by the Engineering Inspector.

30.9. The project proposes to connect the overflow of the proposed Best Management Practice (BMP) to an existing 57-inch storm drain facility owned and maintained by the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFC&WCD). It shall be the sole responsibility of the Applicant to obtain any and all permits/authorizations for the design and construction of the proposed lateral connection to the existing RCFC&WCD facility. If a proposed storm drain connection exceeds the hydraulic performance of the existing drainage facilities, mitigation will be required.

30.10. All flood control and drainage facilities shall be designed and constructed to RCFC&WCD engineering and maintenance standards. The Applicant shall consult with RCFC&WCD early in the design process regarding materials, hydraulic design, regulatory permitting, and transfer of right-of-way.

30.11. For disturbance of one or more acres, the Applicant shall provide evidence that it has prepared and submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The SWRCB issued WDID number shall be included on the face of the grading plan.

30.12. The proposed walls along Lot 6 and 68 shall ensure a clear sight distance in accordance with the FHWA’s ‘Railroad Highway Grade Crossing Handbook’, Section IV, Table 41.

In addition, signage shall comply with the California MUTCD Part 8: Traffic Control for Railroad and Light Rail Transit Grade Crossings. Final details shall be coordinated with Union Pacific Railroad. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, this sight line shall be shown on the plans and shall be in compliance with this condition.

31. PRIOR TO TRACT MAP RECORDATION (ENGINEERING)

31.1. No Final Tract Map shall be recorded until all Planning cases associated with MA23357 are approved, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer.

31.2. After approval of the tentative map and prior to the expiration of said map, the Applicant shall cause the real property included within the tentative map exhibit, or any part thereof, to be surveyed; and a Final Tract Map thereof shall be prepared in accordance to the City Engineer’s requirements, conditions of tentative map approval, and in accordance with the provisions of the City of Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Chapter

7.20. All processing shall be through the City of Jurupa Valley.

JURUPA 67 DENSITY BONUS SUBDIVISION (TTM38888, SDP23172) FEBRUARY 6, 2025 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MA23357
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XXXX

Page 10 of 14 ends

31.3. All common areas shown on the referenced exhibit shall be designated as numbered lots including lots designated for water quality purposes. Lettered lots shall be reserved for public and private roads and alleys.

31.4. Lot access shall be restricted along the northerly property line abutting the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) right -of-way. The Applicant shall dedicate on the Final Tract Map abutter’s rights of access.

31.5. Applicant shall dedicate the required right-of-way for public street and utility purposes for Camino Real on the Final Tract Map to provide a 50-ft half-width right-of-way along the project frontage, as shown on the referenced exhibit.

31.6. Kirby Drive is a private road and shall be no less than 24 -ft in width. Applicant shall dedicate easement for public utilities and drainage purposes together with the right of ingress and egress for emergency vehicles.

31.7. Interior streets shall be private and be designated as letter lots on the Final Tract Map.

Applicant shall dedicate easements for public utilities and drainage purposes together with the right of ingress and egress for emergency vehicles.

Improvement Plans

31.8. The Applicant shall provide improvement plans for all onsite and offsite improvements including, but not limited to, street improvements, striping and pavement markings, streetlights, landscape and irrigation system, water system, and sanitary sewer system as required in Conditions of approval No. 3.9 through 3.13. All plans shall be prepared in accordance with the Riverside County Transportation Department “Improvement Plan Check Policies and Guidelines” as adopted by the City Engineer. All improvements plans shall be processed through the City for approval of the City Engineer.

31.9. Camino Real is designated as a Secondary Highway in the City’s General Plan Mobility Corridors Map and shall be improved as follows:

31.9.1. Full width pavement improvements from proposed gutter lip to existing AC Dike and striping shall be required from the project’s north boundary to a minimum of 560-ft south of the project’s north boundary.

31.9.2. 18-ft westerly parkway to include 5-ft curb-adjacent landscaped parkway, 5-ft sidewalk, 6-ft decomposed granite trail, 2-ft landscaped parkway, streetlights, curb & gutter, irrigation and landscaping.

31.9.3. A Class III Bike Route shall be provided along the project frontage.

31.9.4. Improvements shall provide appropriate transitions from 460 -ft south of the project’s north boundary to the north limit of the RCFC&WCD spillway. Design of transition shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer.

31.9.5. Signing and Striping shall be required along the project frontage.

31.9.6. Roadway widening at the RCFC&WCD spillway will not be required per the applicant-requested concession under the Housing Accountability Act.

JURUPA 67 DENSITY BONUS SUBDIVISION (TTM38888, SDP23172) FEBRUARY 6, 2025 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MA23357
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XXXX

Page 11 of 14 ends

31.10. Intersection of Camino Real (NS) and Street “A” (EW) shall be designed as a three - legged intersection and lane configuration shall be as follows:
• Northbound: One through lane and one left-turn lane.
• Southbound: One through lane and one right-turn lane. • Eastbound: One right.
• Westbound: N/A.

3.11.1. Property line corner cut -back and curb return radius shall be per Riverside County Standard No. 805.

31.11. Kirby Driveway (Private Road) shall be improved with stabilized decomposed granite along the project’s frontage. Access to Jurupa Road from adjacent properties shall be provided at all times.

31.12. Streets ‘A’ through ‘E’, inclusive, and Alleys ‘A’ though ‘C’ are internal to the subdivision.

Improvements for the internal private streets shall consist of, but not limited to, pavement, curb & gutter, rolled curb, cross gutters, spandrels, 5 -ft sidewalk s, and streetlights. Road cross -sections, intersection design, and other applicable improvements shall be as approved by the City Engineer.

31.12.1. Street ‘A’ (Private Street) shall be designed and improved to full-width as 36- ft roadway within the 56 -ft private right -of-way, as shown on the referenced exhibits.

31.12.2. Street ‘B’ (Private Street) shall be designed and improved to full-width as 26- ft roadway within the 36 -ft private right -of-way, as shown on the referenced exhibits.

31.12.3. Street ‘C’ through Street ‘E’ (Private Streets), inclusive, shall be improved to full-width as 26-ft roadway within the 36-ft private right-of-way. Street shall be designed to provide a maintenance access road from Alley ‘C’ to Kirby Drive, no less than 20-ft in width. Access road shall be gated.

31.12.4. Alley ‘A’ and Alley ’C’ (Private Streets) shall be designed and improved to full- width as 26-ft roadway within the 26-ft private right-of-way, as shown on the referenced exhibits. No sidewalks shall be provided.

31.12.5. Alley ‘B’ (Private Street) shall be designed and improved to full-width as 20-ft roadway within the 20-ft private right -of-way, as shown on the referenced exhibits. No sidewalks shall be provided.

31.13. The construction of ADA compliant depressed curbs and access ramps shall be required as shown in the referenced exhibit.

31.14. Existing utilities within Kirby Drive shall b e placed underground if they fall within the project’s boundary.

JURUPA 67 DENSITY BONUS SUBDIVISION (TTM38888, SDP23172) FEBRUARY 6, 2025 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MA23357
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XXXX

Page 12 of 14 ends

L&LMD, CFD, and Special Districts

31.15. Prior to final map recordation, Applicant shall form or annex to if one already exists, a Community Facilities District (CFD) for operation and maintenance purposes of various improvements in the public right -of-way along Camino Real, as approved by the City Engineer. The formation or annexation to a CFD shall be in a manner to be approved by the City Engineer and City Attorney. CFD shall include, but not be limited to, the following:

31.15.1. Landscaping and irrigation;

31.15.2. Graffiti abatement;

31.15.3. Streetlights;

31.15.4. All landscaping, irrigation and maintenance systems shall comply with the “Comprehensive Landscaping Guidelines & Standards” and Riverside County Ordinance No. 859.

31.16. Applicant shall form, or annex to if one already exists, a Community Facilities District (CFD) in order to provide funding for City Public Safety Services. The agreement to form or annex to a CFD for Public Safety Services shall be in a manner to be approved by the City Engineer and City Attorney. Participation in a CFD is intended to fully mitigate the incremental impact of new development on City public safety costs and maintain Should this project be within any assessment/benefit district, the Applicant shall make application for and pay any reapportionment of the assessments or pay the unit fees in the assessment/benefit district.

UTILITIES

31.17. Separate sanitary sewer and domestic water system improvement plans shall be prepared for required improvements for approval of the Jurupa Community Services District (JCSD) and concurrence of the City Engineer. Water system improvement plans showing the locations of fire hydrants (see County Standard 400) off -site and on-site must also be approved by Riverside County Fire Department. Necessary easements for sewer and water systems on -site, as determined by JCSD, shall be shown on the Final Tract Map “to be dedicated by separate instrument”.

31.18. Electrical power, telephone, communication, street lighting, and cable television lines shall be designed to be placed underground in accordance with City of Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Title 7. The Developer is responsible for coordinating the work with the serving utility company. A disposition note describing the above shall be reflected on design improvement plans whenever those plans are required. Written proof confirming initiation of the design and/or application or the relocation, issued by the utility company, shall be submitted to the Engineering Department for verification purposes.

JURUPA 67 DENSITY BONUS SUBDIVISION (TTM38888, SDP23172) FEBRUARY 6, 2025 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MA23357
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XXXX

Page 13 of 14 ends

32. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT (ENGINEERING)

32.1. All grading and construction of infrastructure improvements within the public and private right-of-way in accordance with the approved plans, the City of Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Chapter 8.70, and all other applicable requirements.

32.2. The Project geotechnical/soils engineer shall provide a Final Grading Certification, certifying to the completion of the grading in conformance with the approved grading plans, the recommendation of the Geotechnical/Soils report approved for this project and the California Building Code.

32.3. A licensed land surveyor or civil engineer shall certify the completion of grading in conformance with the lines and grades shown on the approved grading plans.

32.4. The Project Civil Engineer shall provide Record ("As-built") Drawings of grading and all infrastructure improvements.

32.5. Improvement plans shall be approved by the City Engineer, a site specific improvement agreement shall be signed by the City, and financial securities shall be in place prior to permit issuance.

32.6. The Applicant is responsible for completing construction of all post -construction water quality Best Management Practices (BMPs) facilities and features. These facilities and features shall be operated and maintained by the Homeowner’s Association.

32.7. All utility extensions within the site shall be placed underground unless otherwise specified or allowed by these conditions of approval.

32.7.1. Utility extensions from the mainline or other points of connection within the public right-of-way require that the Applicant obtain an Encroachment Permit from the Engineering Department. The City shall make a final inspection of work to verify that any im pacts that the work might have had to other City owned infrastructure is restored or repaired.

32.8. The proposed walls along Lot 6 and 68 shall ensure a clear sight distance in accordance with the FHWA’s ‘Railroad Highway Grade Crossing Handbook’, Section IV, Table 41.

In addition, signage shall comply with the California MUTCD Part 8: Traffic Control for Railroad and Light Rail Transit Grade Crossings. Final details shall be coordinated with Union Pacific Railroad. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, this sight line shall be shown on the plans and shall be in compliance with this condition.

33. PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT FINAL INSPECTION/ CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (ENGINEERING)

33.1. Prior to the first certificate of occupancy, all improvements within the public and private right-of-way shall be completed and accepted by the City.

33.2. Prior to completion and acceptance of im provements or prior to the final building inspection, whichever occurs first and as determined by the City Engineer, assurance of maintenance is r equired by the completion of annexation into the City’s CFD for all applicable improvements specified in these conditions of approval.

JURUPA 67 DENSITY BONUS SUBDIVISION (TTM38888, SDP23172) FEBRUARY 6, 2025 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MA23357
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XXXX

Page 14 of 14 ends

33.3. Prior to the first certificate of occupancy, Applicant shall complete the annexation into the City’s CFD for public safety.

33.4. Prior to the first certificate of occupancy, Applicant shall ensure that all streetlights within the public right of way, required from this project, are energized.

33.5. Prior to the first certificate of occupancy, Applicant shall obtain acceptance of applicable improvements by JCSD. Written proof shall be provided to the Engineering Department.

33.6. Prior to the first certificate of occupancy, Applicant shall obtain acceptance of applicable improvements by RCFC&WCD. Written proof shall be provided to the Engineering Department.

33.7. The Applicant shall comply with the provisions of Riverside County Ordinance No. 659 (Development Impact Fees, DIF), as adopted by the City, or later ordinance adopted by the City, which requires the payment of the appropriate fee set forth in the Ordinance in accordance with the fee schedule in effect at the time of the final inspection.

The Applicant hereby agrees that these Conditions of Approval are valid and lawful and binding on the Applicant, and its successors and assigns, and agrees to the Conditions of Approval.

Applicant’s name (Print Form): __________________________________________

Applicant’s name (Signature): ___________________________________________

Date: ________________

ATTACHMENT NO. 2
Resolution No. 2025-17

-1-
12774-0201\3068804v1.doc
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-17

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY RESCINDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION’S DENIAL OF
MASTER APPLICATION NO. 23357 (PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-20); APPROVING MASTER APPLICATION NO. 23357 CONSISTING OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 38888 (TTM 38888) AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 23172 (SDP 23172), APPROVING DENSITY BONUS APPLICATION NO. 24001 (DB 24001) TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF A PROJECT CONSISTING OF 67
SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED HOMES AT 7586 JURUPA ROAD (APN
183-030-014) ALL SUBJECT TO 1) THE DENIAL OF THE WAIVERS

REQUESTED FOR BOTH THE ONE -STORY REQUIREMENTS OF
JURUPA VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 9.240.550(E)(3) AND

THE LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS OF JURUPA VALLEY
MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS 9.240.550(E)(13)(B), 9.240.550(E)(5), AND 2) CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ; AND APPROVING AN ADDENDUM

TO THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 15164 OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

ACT GUIDELINES (WARMINGTON RESIDENTIAL PROJECT)

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Previous Project. On November 17, 2022, the City Council approved a General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation from LDR (Country Neighborhood) to MDR (Medium Density Residential), a Change of Zone (CZ) from A -1 (Light Agriculture) to R-4 (Planned Development), Tentative Tract Map (TTM) No. 38151, and Site Development Permit (SDP) No. 22089 to subdivide 6.92 acres into 35 lots for single -family detached homes at 7586 Jurupa Road (APN 183 -030-014) (“Madone Collection ”). The Madone Collection project was not constructed.

Section 2. Current Project. Warmington Residential (the “Applicant”) applied for Tentative Tract Map No. 38888 and Site Development No. 23172, and a Density Bonus application No. 24001 (collectively, Master Application No. 23357 or MA No. 23357) to subdivide 6.92 acres into 67 lots for single family detached homes at 7586 Jurupa Road (APN 183 -030-014) (the “Project”).

Section 3. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley does hereby find, determine and declare that:
(a) The application for MA No. 23357 was processed including, but not limited to, a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State law and local law , including the California Environmental Quality Act.
(b) On October 9, 2024, the Planning Commission of the City of Jurupa Valley held a duly noticed public hearing on MA No. 23357 at which time all persons interested in the -2-
12774-0201\3068804v1.doc
Project had the opportunity and did address the Planning Commission on these matters. Th e Planning Commission voted to continue the public hearing to October 23, 2024. (c) The October 23, 2024 public hearing was cancelled due to lack of quorum. (d) On November 13, 2024, the Planning Commission of the City of Jurupa Valley held a duly noticed publi c hearing on MA No. 23357 at which time all persons interested in the Project had the opportunity and did address the Planning Commission on these matters.

Following receipt of public testimony, the Planning Commission closed the -public hearing-and voted unanimously to direct staff to prepare a resolution of denial for consideration at the next regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting.
(e) On December 11, 2024, the Planning Commission unanimously adopted Resolution No. 2024-20 denying the Project.
(f) On January 16, 2025, the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley held a duly noticed public hearing on MA No. 23357 at which time all persons interested in the Project had the opportunity and did address the City Council on these matters. Following receipt of public testimony, the City Council closed the public hearing -and directed staff to prepare a resolution approving MA No. 23357 but denying the requested waiver of the requirement that 75% of the homes be one story and restrictions on the location of two-story homes pursuant to Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Section 9.240.550(E)(3) and denying the requested waivers of certain landscaping requirements set forth in Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Section 9.240.550(E)(3). (g) On February 6, 2025, the City Council clarified its tentative directions and adopted this Resolution as the final action on the Project. (h) All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.

Section 4. Tentative Tract Map.
(a) The Applicant is seeking approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 38888 a Schedule “A” subdivision to subdivide the project site into 67 parcels. (b) Section 7.05.020.A. of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that the Jurupa Valley Planning Commission is designated as the “Advisory Agency” charged with the duty of making investigations and reports on the design and improvement of all proposed tentative Schedule “A” maps. Further, Section 7.05.020.A. of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that the Planning Commission is authorized to approve, conditionally approve or disapprove all such tentative map land divisions and report the action directly to the City Council and the land divider.
(c) Section 7.15.130.A. of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that within fifty (50) days after the date of filing of a tract map or commercial parcel map, a public hearing on the map must be held before the Planning Commission. Section 7.15.130.B. of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that after the close of the hearing, the Planning Commission must approve, conditionally approve, or disapprove the proposed tentative map, file -3-
12774-0201\3068804v1.doc
notice of the decision with the City Clerk, and mail notice of the decision to the land divider, or his or her authorized agent, and any interested party requesting a copy. (d) Section 7.15.180 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code requires denial of a Tentative Parcel Map if it does not meet all of the requirements of Title 7 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code, or if any of the following findings are made:
1) That the proposed land division is not consistent wi th applicable general and specific plans.
2) That the design or improvement of the proposed land division is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans.
3) That the site of the proposed land division is not physically suitable for the type of development.
4) That the site of the proposed land division is not physically suitable for the proposed density of the development.
5) That the design of the proposed land division or proposed improvements are likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.
6) That the design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements are likely to cause serious public health problems. 7) That the design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements will conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of, property within the proposed land division. A land division may be approved if it is found that alternate easements for access or for use will be provi ded and that they will be substantially equivalent to ones previously acquired by the public. This subsection shall apply only to easements of record or to easements established by judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction. 8) Notwithstanding subsection 5) above, a tentative map may be approved if an environmental impact report was prepared with respect to the project and a finding was made, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. Resources Code Section 21000 et seq. ), that specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the environmental impact report.

Section 5. Site Development Permit.
(a) The Applicant is seeking approval of Site Development Permi t No. 23172 to construct 67 single family detached homes on 6.92 acres. (b) Section 9.240.330.(3) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that no site development permit shall be approved unless it complies with the following standards:
-4-
12774-0201\3068804v1.doc
1) The proposed use must conform to all the requirements of the City of Jurupa Valley General Plan and with all applicable requirements of State law and the ordinances of the City of Jurupa Valley.
2) The overall development of the land shall be designed for the protection of the public health, safety and general welfare; to conform to the logical development of the land and to be compatible with the present and future logical development of the surrounding property. The plan shall consider the location and need for dedication and improvement of necessary streets and sidewalks, including the avoidance of traffic congestion; and shall take into account topographical and drainage conditions, including the need for dedication and improvements of necessary structures as a part thereof. 3) All site development plans which permit the construction of more than one structure on a single legally divided parcel shall, in addition to all other requirements, be subject to a condition which prohibits the sale of any existing or s ubsequently constructed structures on the parcel until the parcel is divided and a final map recorded in accordance with Title 7 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code in such a manner that each building is located on a separate legally divided parcel.

Section 6. Density Bonus Application.
(a) The Applicant submitted an application for a “density bonus” under Chapter

9.300 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code related to Site Development Permit No. 23172 for the construction of sixty -seven (67) single family residences. By a greeing to make three (3) units available to very low income households at an affordable cost, the Applicant is entitled to a twenty percent (20%) density bonus.
(b) The Applicant also seeks one incentive/concession. Specifically, the applicant seeks to not comply with offsite improvements to widen the Camino Real over and including the Flood Control spillway.
(c) The Applicant also seeks to deviate from 34 of the City’s development standards through the “waiver” provision under Government Code Section 65915(e). The specific development standards from which the Applicant seeks to deviate are set forth in subsection (d) below. Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Section 9.30.050(D) provides that the City shall approve a waiver or reduction of a development standard, u nless it makes one (1) or more of the following findings:
1) The application of the development standard does not have the effect of physically precluding the construction of a housing development at the density allowed by the density bonus and with the incentives or concessions granted to the applicant; 2) The waiver or reduction of the development standard would have a specific, adverse impact, as defined in Government Code Section 65589.5(d)(2) upon health, safety, or the physical environment, and for which th ere is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific adverse impact;
-5-
12774-0201\3068804v1.doc
3) The waiver or reduction of the development standard would have an adverse impact on any real property that is listed in the California Register of Historical Resources; or
4) The waiver or reduction of the development standard would be contrary to state or federal law.
(d) The Applicant seeks to deviate from the following development standards:

Code Requirement Standard Request/Deviation Waiver
Number
JVMC
§ 9.100.040(A)
The minimum overall
area for each dwelling
unit, exclusive of the
area used for commercial
purposes and area set
aside for street rights-of-
way, but including
recreation and service
areas shall be 6,000
square feet.

Lots range from 2,498
square feet to 5,044
square feet. The average
lot size is 3,036 square
feet.
1 JVMC
§ 9.100.040(B)
The minimum lot area
for the individual lots
used as a residential
building site shall be
3,500 square feet.

Only six of the 67 lots
are larger than 3,500
square feet. The other 61
lots range in size from
2,498 square feet to
3,436 square feet.
2 JVMC
§9.100.040(B)
The minimum width of
each lot shall be 40 feet
and the minimum depth
shall be eighty (80) feet.

Only two of the 67 lots
are wider than 40 feet,
the remaining 65 lots
range in size from
approximately 30 feet to

38.5 feet wide.
3 JVMC
§ 9.100.040(B)
The minimum width of
each lot shall be 40 feet
and the minimum depth
shall be 80 feet.

Although two of the 67
lots are wider than 40
feet, the remaining lots
range from
approximately 30 feet to

38.5 feet wide
4 JVMC
§ 9.100.040(D)(1)
The front yard shall be
not less than 20 feet,
measured from the
With the exception of
one lot, front yard
5 -6-
12774-0201\3068804v1.doc
existing right-of-way as
shown on any Specific
Plan of Highways,
whichever is nearer the
proposed structure.
setbacks range from 15
feet to 18 feet, 8 inches
JVMC
§ 9.100.040(D)(2)
Side yards on interior
and through lots shall be
not less than a width of
five feet. Side yard on
corner and reversed
corner lots shall be not
less than 10 feet from the
existing right-of-way or
from any future right-of-
way as shown on any
Specific Plan of
Highways, whichever is
nearer the proposed
structure
One lot proposes side
yards that meet the
requirement.

Seven (7) lots propose
one side yard that meet
the requirement.

6, 7
JVMC
§ 9.100.040(D)(3)
The rear yard shall not
be less than 10 feet.

Three of the 67 lots have
a rear yard that is less
than 10 feet. These three
lots have rear yards that
are 8.4, 9.4, and 9.8 feet
in size.
8 JVMC
§ 9.100.040(D)(4)
No structural
encroachments shall be
permitted in the front,
side or rear yard except
as provided for in
Section 9.240.180.
66 homes encroach into
the required front yard
setback.
66 homes encroach into
the required side yard
setback.
3 homes encroach into
the required rear yard
setback.
9 JVMC
§ 9.240.550(E)(2)
The minimum lot area is
as required under the
applicable zone
classification for the
subject property(s).

The minimum lot size
requirement in the R-4 is
3,500 square feet. Only
six of the 67 lots are
larger than 3,500 square
feet. The remaining lots
range in size from 2,498
10 -7-
12774-0201\3068804v1.doc
square feet to 3,436
square feet.

JVMC
§ 9.240.550(E)(3)
Building height. Single-
family residence shall
not exceed 35 feet in
height and more than
two stories pursuant to
the following:
(a) The number of lots
within the subdivision
with two story dwellings
shall not exceed 25%;
(b) No two story
dwelling may be located
on a lot adjacent to
another two story
dwelling; and
(c) No two story
dwellings may be located
on a corner lot.

The proposed homes do
not exceed 35 feet in
height, but all sixty-seven
(67) homes are proposed
at two (2) stories,
meaning that there are
two story homes that are
adjacent to one another,
and two story homes are
located on corner lots.
11, 12, 13
JVMC
§ 9.240.550(E)(4)
Floor area ratio. The
maximum FAR for a one
story dwelling, including
the garage, shall not
exceed 0.40. The
maximum FAR for the
ground floor of a two
story dwelling, including
the garage, shall not
exceed 0.25. The
maximum FAR for the
second floor of a two
story dwelling shall not
exceed 0.15.

All lots have a 1st story
FAR of more than .25.

Average FAR for the 1st
story is .42
All lots have a second
story FAR of more than
.15. Average FAR for
second story is .39.
14, 15
JVMC
§ 9.240.550(E)(5)
Open space. Not less
than 50% of the lot area
shall be permeable open
space. Not less than 90%
of the required open
space area shall be
landscaped. Driveways
to garages located in the
rear half (½) of the lot
shall not be included in
Only fourteen (14) homes
have more than fifty (50)
percent permeable open
space. The permeable
open space for the
remaining 53 homes
range from 39 to 49
percent. The project only
proposes to landscape the
front yard of each lot
16, 17
-8-
12774-0201\3068804v1.doc
the permeable open
space calculation.
which is less than the
required 90 percent.

JVMC
§ 9.240.550(E)(6)
Setbacks. Provide
useable open space areas
with generous street side
setbacks that enhance the
visual appearance of the
street parkway pursuant
to the following:
(a) Front yard. Minimum
twenty (20) foot front
rear setback. Front yard
setbacks are required to
vary in length, it is
encouraged that there be
an average front yard
setback of twenty-five
(25) for the entire
subdivision.
c) Side yard, interior.

Minimum six (6) foot or
not less than ten (10)
percent of the lot width,
whichever is the greater
setback.
(d) Side yard, street
facing. Minimum ten
(10) foot setback.
(e) Rear yard. Minimum
of a twenty (20) foot
setback.
(f) Garage attached.

Street facing garages
shall be a minimum ten
(10) foot setback from
the front building line of
the dwelling and shall be
side facing in the front
half of the lot. Side entry
garages minimum of
twenty-foot front yard
setback.

One lot meets this
requirement, the
remaining front yard
setbacks range from 15 to
18 feet, 8 inches.

Only one of 67 lots is
proposed to have both
side yards that meet the
requirement.

Only 7 of the 67 lots are
propose to have one side
yard that meets the
requirement.

Six lots are proposed to
provide street facing side
yards. Three of the 6 lots
have side yards (street
facing) that are less than
10 feet.

Garages are not set back
ten (10) feet from the
front building line. All
garages are located in the
front half of the property
and are not side facing.
18, 19, 20, 21,
22 JVMC
§ 9.240.550(E)(7)
Garages. Garages
attached or detached
All garages are located
within the front half of
23 -9-
12774-0201\3068804v1.doc
shall be a secondary
feature of the home.

Garages facing the street
shall be located in the
rear half (½) of the lot.

Corner lot garages shall
not face the street side
yard.
the lot and corner lot
garages face the front
yard/street.

JVMC
§ 9.240.550(E)(8)
Off-street parking and
driveways.
(a) A minimum of two
covered garage spaces
per dwelling unit.

(b) Minimum 45 feet
between driveway curb
cuts to accommodate two
on-street parking spaces
between driveways. One
driveway curb cut per
lot. At the discretion of
the Public Works and
Community
Development Directors,
shorter distances
between driveway cuts
on cul-de-sacs can be
approved.

Although two covered
spaces are provided per
dwelling unit, less than
45 feet is being proposed
in between driveway curb
cuts. The space between
driveways ranges from
approximately 13 feet to
approximately 22 feet.
24, 25
JVMC
§ 9.240.550(E)(9)
Streets.
(a) Street layout. Interior
streets shall connect to
the internal streets of
existing, adjacent
neighborhoods, schools,
commercial centers,
civic buildings, and
parks.
(b) Street stub outs.

Street stub outs shall be
provided to connect to
future subdivisions.
(d) Rights-of-way.

Minimum fifty-six (56)
foot local street width.

Interior streets do not
connect to internal streets
of any adjacent
properties.

Street stub outs are not
proposed as part of this
project.

The internal streets are
36 feet wide, which is
less than the 56 foot
minimum.

26, 27, 28, 29,
30, 31
-10-
12774-0201\3068804v1.doc
Minimum sixty (60) foot
collector street width.
(e) Roadway width.

Maximum thirty-six (36)
foot local street width.

Maximum forty (40) foot
collector street width.
(f) Alley width.

Maximum twenty (20)
foot alley width.
(g) Parkway. For local
streets minimum 10 foot
parkway width. The
parkway shall include a
five foot wide sidewalk
and the area between the
sidewalk and the curb
shall be landscaped
unless obstructed by
public signage, fire
hydrants or other safety
equipment, or utility
equipment. For non-local
streets, the minimum
parkway width is 15 feet.

At the discretion of the
Public Works and
Community
Development Directors
parkway widths can be
modified.
(h)Traffic calming
features. Subdivisions
shall include traffic-
calming features such as
traffic circles, bulb-outs,
center islands, chicanes,
speed humps, bicycle
lanes/shared lane
markings (sharrows), or
other traffic calming
devices designed to
minimize conflicts
between vehicles and
pedestrians, equestrians,
and bicycles.

Twenty-six foot wide
roadway widths are
provided, which is less
than the 36 foot
minimum.

Alleys are proposed to be
26 feet wide which is
wider than the 20 foot
maximum.

Parkways are less than
the 10 foot wide
requirement, as the
parkways are proposed at
5 feet and do not include
landscape planters.

-11-
12774-0201\3068804v1.doc
JVMC
§ 9.240.550(E)(13)
Landscaping and
walls/fences. The
composition and location
of landscaping shall
comply with the
provisions of Chapter

9.283 of this Code and
the following standards:
(a) Street trees. A
minimum of one canopy
tree per lot or 40 feet of
street frontage when
permissible. Street trees
shall be a minimum of
two inch caliper
measured six feet above
the ground. A tree
landscaped area shall be
provided and be of an
appropriate size to
accommodate the mature
size and height of the
tree. Trees shall be
located between the
sidewalk and the curb.
(b) Landscaping
area. The front yard
setback area shall be
landscaped and include a
minimum of one (1) 36
inch box canopy tree.

The rear yard setback
shall be landscaped. 90%
of the required lot open
space shall be
landscaped.
(c) Natural
features. Single-family
residential subdivisions
shall protect and
preserve natural features
such as, without
limitation, unique natural
terrain, rock
outcroppings, streams

The project does not
propose street trees as the
proposed parkways do
not include a landscape
planter.

The project proposes
front yard trees for 65 of
the 67 lots. The proposed
trees will be 24 inch box
which do not meet the
minimum requirement of
36 box.

The project does not
propose rear yard setback
landscaping.

The Project does not
propose 90% of the
required open space to be
landscaped.

The project does not
propose to protect or
preserve natural features.

32, 33, 34
-12-
12774-0201\3068804v1.doc
(perennial, intermittent,
ephemeral), mature trees,
and native habitat.

Section 7. California Environmental Quality Act.
(a) On November 17, 2022, the City Council adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration (“MND”) and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (“MMRP”) for the Madone Collection by Resolution No. 2022-109.
(b) The City has ca used an Addendum to be prepared to the previously approved MND in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 because the approval of the Project does not require the preparation of a new or Supplemental Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164.
(c) Consistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, the City Council finds and determines that an Addendum to the MND is the appropriate environmental document to analyze the Project because:
1) Some changes or additions to the MND are nece ssary, but none of the conditions described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent MND have occurred.
2) There are no substantial changes proposed by the Project that will require major revisions to the MND due to the inv olvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; 3) No substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken that will require major revisions to the MND due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and 4) There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the MND was adopted showing that: (a) the changes proposed with the Project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the MND; (b) there are s ignificant effects previously examined that will be substantially more severe than shown in the MND; (c) there are mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more sig nificant effects of the project, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measures or alternative; or (d) mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the MND would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.
(d) The Addendum to the MND and revised MMRP, attached hereto as Exhibit A, is hereby adopted.
-13-
12774-0201\3068804v1.doc
(e) The custodian of records for the MND, MMRP, revised MMRP, and Addendum, and all other materials that constitute the record of proceedings is the Community Development Department of the City of Jurupa Valley. Those documents are available for public review in the Community Development Department located at 8930 Limo nite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, California 92509.

Section 8. Findings for Approval of Tentative Tract Map . In approving the Tentative Tract Map No. 38888, the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley finds and determines that:
(a) The proposed land division is consistent w ith applicable general and specific plans. The General Plan land use designation is MHDR (Medium High Density Residential) and although the maximum density in the MHDR land use is eight (8) dwelling units per acre, state density bonus law grants the projec t a 20% density bonus. Without the implementation of State Density Bonus Law, the Project’s base density of 55.36 (rounded up to 56) is consistent with the MHDR land use designation.
(b) The design or improvement of the proposed land division is consistent with applicable general and specific plans because the project will support the General Plan’s encouragement to establish high quality neighborhoods that have a range of housing styles, affordability, and attract homebuyers to the City.
(c) The site of the proposed land division is physically suitable for the type of development because the Project site is undeveloped and can physically accommodate the proposed single family residential lots.
(d) The site of the proposed land division is physically suitable for the proposed density of the development because under State Density Bonus Law the City is required to provide a density bonus of up to 20% and is required to waive certain development standards to ensure that the construction of the 67 single family residences can be accommodated on the Project site. (e) The design of the proposed land division or proposed improvements is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat because the City has prepared an Mitigated Negative Declaration which analyzed potential impacts to fish or wildlife or their habitat and prepared appropriate mitigation measures to reduce impacts to a level of less than significant. (f) The design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems because the Project meets all the standards of Title 7 (Subdivision) of the Municipal Code to ensure the project design meets safety standards and requirements that ensure the proposed project is adequate for health, safety, and general warfare of the community.
(g) The design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of, property within the proposed land division.
-14-
12774-0201\3068804v1.doc
Section 9. Findings for Approval of Site Development Permit . In approving Site Development Permit No. 23172, the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley finds and determines that:
(a) The Project is consistent with the General Plan, zoning ordinance, and applicable State law. The General Plan land use designation is MHDR (Medium High Density Residential) and although the maximum density in the MHDR land use is eight (8) dwelling units per acre, state density bonus la w grants the project a 20% density bonus. Without the implementation of State Density Bonus Law, the Project’s base density of 55.36 (rounded up to 56) is consistent with the MHDR land use designation.
(b) The combination of the site design, building design, c ompliance with all applicable development standards, mitigation measures, and conditions of approval will ensure that the Project as designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The Project is consistent with the logical d evelopment of the land use and with the surrounding land uses. The Project site offers a unique opportunity to develop an entry level traditional single-family neighborhood with various architectural styles, tree lined streets, open space, and recreational amenities. The Project meets some of the applicable development standards of the R -4 zone and the Traditional Neighborhood Design Standards, but seeks a waiver of some development standards as permitted under State Density Bonus Law.
(c) The Project considers the location and need for dedication and improvement of necessary streets and sidewalks, including the avoidance of traffic congestion in that it includes public right -of-way improvements along Camino Real, and sufficient on -site pedestrian and vehicular access, and vehicular parking.
(d) The Project takes into account topographical and drainage conditions, including the need for dedication and improvements of necessary structures as a part thereof in that topographical and drainage conditions have been addressed through an approved Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan and proposed Conditions of Approval recommended the City’s Engineering Department.
(e) The proposed Site Development Permit No. 23172 does not permit the construction of more than one structure on a single legally divided parcel.

Section 10. Findings for Approval of Density Bonus Application. In approving Density Bonus Application (DB24001), with the exception of a waiver of the requirements in Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Sections 9.240.550(E)(13)(b) a nd (E)(5) the City Council makes the following findings:
(a) Density Bonus. The Project site is 6.92 acres in size and has a land use designation of Medium High Density Residential. Under the land use designation, the Applicant is permitted to construct a maximum of 8 dwelling units per acre for a total of 55.36 units, which under State Density Bonus Law is rounded to 56 units. The Applicant is proposing a project with 5% of the base density units (equaling 3 units) to be reserved and sold at an affordable cost to very low income households. Government Code section 65915(b)(1) provides that a city shall grant one density bonus if an applicant for a housing development seeks and agrees to construct a -15-
12774-0201\3068804v1.doc
housing development with five percent of the total units of a housing development restricted for rental or sale to very low income households, as defined in Section 50105 of the Health and Safety Code. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65915(f)(2) this entitles the Applicant to a 20% density bonus, which equates to a total of 68 units. The Applicant is, however, only seeking to construct 67 units. The City Council hereby grants the density bonus allowing the Applicant to construct 67 units.
(b) Incentive/Concession. Government Code section 65915(d)(2) provides that a city shall grant one incentive or concession if an applicant for a housing development seeks and agrees to construct a housing development with at least five percent of the total units of a housing development restricted for rental or sale to very low income households, as defined in Section 50105 of the Health and Safety Code. The Applicant seeks an incentive/concession to not construct the following offsite improvements: Widening of Camino Real over and including flood control spillway. The City Council hereby grants this incentive/concession. (c) Waiver of Development Standards.
1) Government Code section 65915(e)(1) provides that in no case may a city apply any development standard that will have the effect of physically precluding the construction of a development meeting the criteria of subdivision (b) at the densities or with the concessions or incentives permitted by this section. Moreover, Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Section 9.300.050(D) provides that the City shall approve a waiver unless it make s a finding that the “application of the development standard does not have the effect of physically precluding the construction of a housing development at the density allowed by the density bonus and with the incentives or concessions granted to the applicant“ or one of the other applicable findings. 2) The City Council hereby grants 31 of the 34 waivers requested by the Applicant, as set forth in Section 6 above.
3) Denial of Waiver of One-Story Requirement s JVMC Section

9.240.550(E)(3). The City Council den ies the waiver of the development standards set forth in Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Section 9.240.550(E)(3) which mandates that Single -family residence shall not exceed 35 feet in height and more than two stories pursuant to the following:
(a) The number of lots within the subdivision with two story dwellings shall not exceed 25%; (b) No two story dwelling may be located on a lot adjacent to another two story dwelling; and (c) No two story dwellings may be located on a corner lot. The City is only re quired to waive a development standard if the imposition of that development standard would physically preclude the construction of the project at the density or with the concession/incentive permitted by state law. In this instance, the Applicant can phy sically construct 67 single family residences and still comply with the requirements set forth in Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Section 9.240.550(E)(3).

Additionally, a waiver of the standards set forth in Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Sectio n

9.240.550(E)(3) would have a specific, adverse, cumulative impact, as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Section 65589.5, upon health of persons in the Project and in the community, set forth in the and for which there is no feasible method to satisfactori ly mitigate or avoid the specific, adverse impact. Granting the requested waiver of the requirements of Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Section 9.240.550(E)(3), when combined with the requested waiver of the landscaping requirements of Section 9.240.550(E)(13)(b) and (E)(5), would reduce airflow in the -16-
12774-0201\3068804v1.doc
Project and substantially impede the flushing of air pollutants, prevent the filtering of air pollutants and exacerbate the air quality in an around the Project. As such the City Council hereby denies the Appl icant’s specific requests to waive the requirements in Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Section 9.240.550(E)(3).
4) Denial of Waiver of Landscaping Requirements JVMC Sections

9.240.550(E)(5) and 9.240.550(E)(13)(b). The City Council denies the waiver of the development standards set forth in Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Section 9.240.550(E)(13)(b) which mandates that the lots provide one, thirty -six (36) inch box tree in the front yard, that the rear yard setback be landscaped, and that ninety (90) percent of t he required open space of each lot be landscaped.

The City Council further denies the waiver of the development standard set forth in Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Section 9.240.550(E)(5) which requires that ninety (90) percent of the required open space of each lot be landscaped. The City is only required to waive a development standard if the imposition of that development standard would physically preclude the construction of the project at the density or with the concession/incentive permitted by state law. In this instance, the Applicant can physically construct 67 single family residences and still comply with the requirements set forth in Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Section 9.240.550(E)(13)(b) and (E)(5).

Additionally, a waiver of the standards set forth in Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Section

9.240.550(E)(13)(b) and (E)(5) would have a specific, adverse, cumulative impact, as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Section 65589.5, upon health of persons in the Project and in the community, set forth in the and for which there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific, adverse impact. Policies AQ 2.2, AQ 2.4 of the Air Quality Element of the City’s General Plan provide for the planting of landscaping, vegetation and trees in order to trap particulate materials and control pollution with their attendant adverse impacts upon the health of people residing in the Project and the City. As such the City Council hereby denies the Applicant’s specific requests to waive t he requirements in Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Section

9.240.550(E)(13)(b) and the requirements set forth in Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Sections

9.240.550(E)(5).

Section 11. Approval of Master Application No. 21143 with Conditions . Based on the foregoing, the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley hereby approves Master Application No. 21143, comprised of Tentative Tract Map No. 38888, Site Development Permit No. 23172 and Density Bonus Application No. 24001, to allow the construction of 67 single family detached homes on 6.92 acres of land at 7586 Jurupa Road (APN: 183-030-014), all subject to: 1) the denial of the waivers requested for both the one-story requirements of Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Section 9.240.550(E)(3) and the landscaping requirements of Se ctions 9.240.550(E)(13)(b) and

9.240.550(E)(5); and 2) the conditions of approval attached hereto as Exhibit “B” and incorporated herein as though set forth in full.

-17-
12774-0201\3068804v1.doc

Section 12. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 6th day of February, 2025.

______________________________
Brian Berkson
Mayor

ATTEST:

_______________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk

-18-
12774-0201\3068804v1.doc

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.

CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )

I, Victoria Wasko , City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby cert ify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2025-17 was duly passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on the 6th day of February 2025, by the following votes, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 6th day of February, 2025.

___________________________
Victoria Wasko, City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
Exhibit A Addendum to Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigated Monitoring and Reporting Program
ADDENDUM No. 1
to the

ADOPTED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
(MA21143)
Madone Collection Planned Residential Development

Amendment to Tentative Tract Map No. 38151
City of Jurupa Valley Master Application 23357

Lead Agency

City of Jurupa Valley
8930 Limonite Avenue
Jurupa Valley, CA 92509
Contact: Miguel Del Rio, Senior Planner
(951) 332-6464 ext. 252
[email protected]

Project Proponent:

Warmington Residential California, Inc
3090 Pullman Street
Costa Mesa, CA 92676

April 15 , 2024, Revised July 31, 2024

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 1 ends

Table Of Contents

1.0 Determination .................................................................................................................................................................. 3

2.0 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................................... 3

3.0 Project Description .......................................................................................................................................................... 3

4.0 Analysis of Potential Environmental Effects ................................................................................................................. 7

4.1 Aesthetics .......................................................................................................................................................................... 7

4.2 Agriculture Resources ..................................................................................................................................................... 9

4.3 Air Quality ..................................................................................................................................................................... 11

4.4 Biological Resources ...................................................................................................................................................... 15

4.5 Cultural Resources ........................................................................................................................................................ 19

4.6 Energy ............................................................................................................................................................................. 22

4.7 Geology and Soils ........................................................................................................................................................... 26

4.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions ........................................................................................................................................... 29

4.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials .............................................................................................................................. 31

4.10 Hydrology and Water Quality ...................................................................................................................................... 34

4.11 Land Use and Planning ................................................................................................................................................. 38

4.12 Mineral Resources ......................................................................................................................................................... 40

4.13 Noise ................................................................................................................................................................................ 41

4.14 Population and Housing ................................................................................................................................................ 44

4.15 Public Services ............................................................................................................................................................... 46

4.16 Recreation ...................................................................................................................................................................... 50

4.17 Traffic and Circulation ................................................................................................................................................. 52

4.18 Tribal Cultural Resources ............................................................................................................................................ 56

4.19 Utilities and Service Systems ........................................................................................................................................ 60

4.20 Wildfire ........................................................................................................................................................................... 64

5.0 CONCLUSION .............................................................................................................................................................. 65

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 2 ends

Appendices
Appendix A: CalEEMod Datasheets, March 27, 2023
Appendix B: Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Consistency Analysis and Biological Report, LSA Associates, Inc., January 2024.

Appendix C: Phase II Environmental Site Assessment, Stantec Consulting Services Inc., November 7, 2023.

Appendix D: Preliminary Hydrology Report, Adkan Engineers, February 14, 2024.

Appendix E: Preliminary WQMP, Adkan Engineers, December 15, 2023.

Appendix F: Technical Noise Memorandum for the Madone Residential Development in Jurupa Valley, California, LSA Associates, Inc., February 5, 2024.

Appendix G: Madone Residential Project Trip Generation and Vehicle Miles Traveled Analysis, LSA Associates, Inc., February 02, 2024.

Appendix H: First Renewal Water and Sewer Availability (Letter), Jurupa Community Services District, March 25, 2024.

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 3 ends

1.0 Determination

Based on the evaluation in this document, I find that no substantial changes are proposed in the Project and there are no substantial changes in the circumstances under which the Project will be undertaken that will require major revisions to the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) due to the involvement of significant new environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. Also, there is no "new information of substantial importance" as that term is used in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a)(3). Therefore, the previously Adopted MND is adequate upon completion of an ADDENDUM.

City of Jurupa Valley
Signature Agency

Joe Perez, Community Development Director April 15, 2024, Revised July 31, 2024 Printed Name/Title Date:

2.0 Introduction
This document is an Addendum to the Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration Madone Collection Planned Residential Development, (“ MND") and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) Adopted by the City Council on November 17, 2022, by Resolution No. 2022-109. Its purpose is to substantiate the City of Jurupa Valley's determination that no supplemental or subsequent environmental review is required prior to considering the approval of the Amendment to Tentative Tract Map (TTM) No. 38151 and Site Development Permit (SDP) No. 22089.

3.0 Project Description

3.1 Project Location and Setting

The Project site is located on approximately 6.92 acres at 7586 Jurupa Road. The site is located on the south side of Jurupa Road, with Camino Real to the east, Camino Real Elementary School to the south, residential uses to the west and northeast, and Patriot High School to the northwest. The Project site is identified by the following Assessor Parcel Number (APN): 183-030-014. (See Figure 3.1- Vicinity Location Map and Aerial Photo).

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 4 ends

Figure 3.1- Vicinity Location Map/Aerial Photo

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 5 ends

3.2 Approved Project Description:

In 2022, the City Council approved Tentative Tract Map (TTM) No. 3815, Site Development Permit (SDP) No. 22089, a General Plan Amendment (GPA) to change the land use designation from LDR (Country Neighborhood) to MDR (Medium Density Residential), a Change of Zone (CZ) from A -1 (Light Agriculture) to R -4 (Planned Development) The Project is called Madone Collection Residential Development with the TTM approved to subdivide 6.92 acres into 35 lots for single -family detached houses. The Project included recreational area park, dog park, walking trails, exercise stations, tot lot , Gazebo and BBQ areas, and sitting areas. The R -4 zone allows for lot sizes of a minimum overall site area of 6,000 square-feet for each dwelling unit and a minimum lot area of 3,500 square-feet.

See Exhibit 3.3-1- Site Plan for Approved Project below.

Exhibit 3.3-1 Site Plan for Approved Project Site Plan

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 6 ends

3.3 Proposed Modified Project Description

The Modified Project proposes modifications to the approved TTM and increase the number of lots to 67 lots for single-family detached houses. The Project is requesting the density increase per the State Density Bonus Law which would provide for a density bonus of 20 percent. 1 The Project’s density of 67 residential units represents a density bonus of 16 percent. The approved GPA and CZ will not be changed by the modified Project.

The proposed Project will include recreational area park, dog park, tot lot, Gazebo and BBQ areas, and sitting areas. The proposed Project lot sizes of a minimum overall site area of 2,498 square-feet and a maximum of 5,044 square-feet with an average of 2,974.6 square-feet.

See Exhibit 3.3-2- Site Plan for Proposed Project below.

Exhibit 3.3-2 Site Plan for Proposed Modified Project

1 State Density Bonus Law Request Letter for 7586 Jurupa Road Project dated June 30, 2023, included as Appendix A.

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 7 ends

4.0 Analysis of Potential Environmental Effects

CEQA Guidelines §15164 provides for the use of an Addendum to document the basis of a lead agency's decision not to require a Subsequent or Supplemental MND for a change to a project that has been analyzed in an Adopted MND. The lead agency's decision to use an Addendum must be supported by substantial evidence that the conditions that would trigger the preparation of a Subsequent MND, as provided in CEQA Guidelines §15162, are not present. The following discussion provides the basis for this conclusion.

4.1 Aesthetics
Except as provided in Public Resources Code Section
21099, would the project
New Potentially
Significant
Impact
New Mitigation
Required Reduced Impact No New Impact
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒

4.1.1 Summary of MND Conclusions

4.1.A The Adopted MND found there are no designated scenic vistas on or surrounding the project site, and compliance with existing General Plan policies and design guidelines would further ensure development of the project would have less than significant impact on scenic vistas.

Based on the analysis , no public views of a scenic vista would be significantly or permanently blocked with implementation of PPP 4.1.1 and 4.1.2.

4.1.B Existing rock outcropping to the west of the project site on Rattlesnake Mountain would be preserved and buffered from the project site by open space . There are no historic buildings or significant trees associated with the project site. In addition, according to the General Plan, the Project site is not located within or adjacent to a scenic corridor or roadway2.

4.1.C In addition, according to the General Plan , the Project site is not located within or adjacent to a scenic corridor or roadway3.

2City of Jurupa Valley, General Plan Conservation and Open Space Element, Figure 4-23: Jurupa Valley scenic corridors and roadways 3City of Jurupa Valley, General Plan Conservation and Open Space Element, Figure 4-23: Jurupa Valley scenic corridors and roadways

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 8 ends

The project would comply with the City’s building height regulations, design standards, and guidelines for residences as required by PPP 4.1-1 and 4.1-2. Implementation of the project would not substantially degrade the existing character or quality of the project site.

4.1.D Impacts due to light and glare will be less than significant with implementation of existing zoning standards and PPP 4.1 -3. The primary exterior of the future structures will be typical of single-family detached housing and consist of non-reflective materials including stucco exterior and tile or metal roofing materials. Therefore, potential glare from the proposed Project is considered to be less than significant.

4.1.2 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts

There are no unavoidable adverse impacts identified in the Adopted MND.

4.1.3 Applicable General Plan Policies

PPP 4.1.1 As required by Municipal Code section 9.115.040 (3 ), no building or structure shall exceed fifty (50) feet in height, unless a greater height is approved pursuant to Section

9.240.370. In no event, however, shall a building or structure exceed seventy -five (75) feet in height, unless a variance is approved pursuant to Section 9.240.270.

PPP 4.1-2 As required by Jurupa Valley Municipal Code section 7.50.010, all utilities serving and within the Project site shall be placed underground unless exempted by this section.

PPP 4.1-3 All outdoor lighting shall be designed and installed to comply with California Green Building Standard Code Section 5.106 or with a local ordinance lawfully enacted pursuant to California Green Building Standard Code Section 101.7, whichever is more stringent.

4.1.4 Applicable Adopted MND Mitigation Measures

As described in the Adopted MND , impacts related to aesthetics were determined to be less than significant and no mitigation measures were identified.

No substantial changes in the environment related to aesthetics will occur with the Project modifications that would lead to more significant impacts, and no new mitigation measures are required.

4.1.5 Proposed Project Impact Analysis

Development of the Proposed Project has the potential to impact visual and scenic resources. Based on an examination of the analysis, findings, and conclusions of the Adopted MND , implementation of the proposed modifications would not substantially increase the severity of significant impacts

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 9 ends

previously identified, nor would new significant impacts related to Scenic Vistas, Scenic Resources, Visual Character, and Light and Glare that were not identified in the Adopted MND .

The boundaries of the Project site are not changing as part of the proposed modified Project and the site is not located within a scenic vista, a State scenic highway.

The Adopted MND and related implementing actions established goals and policies for development of the Project. Development of the Proposed Project will be constructed in light of the policies of the General Plan, Municipal Code, and the approved Conditions, and the Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.

4.2 Agriculture Resources

New Potentially
Significant
Impact
New Mitigation
Required Reduced Impact No New Impact
Would the project
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps
prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non‐
agricultural use?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒

Note: Because there are no forestry resources located in the City of Jurupa, the topic of Forestry Resources was not addressed in the Adopted MND.

4.2.1 Summary of MND Conclusions

4.2.A The Project site is designated as “Urban and Built-Up Land” by the State Department of Conservation4. The Project site does not contain any lands designated as Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance as mapped by the State Department of Conservation Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program. In addition, no properties abutting the Project site are classified as Farmland. The City of Jurupa Valley’s General Plan considers agricultural land to be an appropriate use of land until such time as a property owner considers farming to be no longer economically viable which is why the General Plan designates agricultural land for eventual suburban and urban uses. Therefore, the proposed Project would not result in the conversion of any Farmland to non-agricultural use. Therefore, there are no impacts.

4California Department of Conservation, Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program, https://databasin.org/datasets/b83ea1952fea44ac9fc62c60dd57fe48 , accessed August 30, 2022.

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 10 ends

4.2.B The current land use for the site is Country Neighborhood and zoning classification for the site is A -1 (Light Agriculture). The County Neighborhood designation and the A -1 zoning classification agricultural zones are A -2 (Heavy Agriculture), and A -D (Agriculture-Dairy). Based on this, the site is not considered a primary agricultural zone.

The site is currently not being used for agricultural purposes. The Project is proposing a change of zone to R -4 (Planned Residential). The R -4 Zone is intended to allow development of subdivisions containing open areas that will be used for recreation purposes and is not considered a primary agriculture zone. T herefore, the Project would not conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use.

Williamson Act

There are no agricultural uses or Williamson Act contracts associated with the project site. According to the County of Riverside Map My County (RCIT), the site is not within an agricultural preserve.5 Since the Project site does not have any current agricultural use and is not identified as farmland, implementation of the proposed Project will not convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland) as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use. The Project therefore will have no impacts on existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract.

4.2.2 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts

There are no unavoidable adverse impacts identified in the Adopted MND .

4.2.3 Applicable General Plan Policies

There were no GP Policies identified in the Approved Project Adopted MND .

4.2.4 Applicable Adopted MND Mitigation Measures

As described in the Adopted MND , impacts related to agricultural resources were determined to be less than significant and no mitigation measures were identified.

No substantial changes in the environment related to agricultural resources will occur with the Project modifications that would lead to more significant impacts, and no new mitigation measures are required.

5 Riverside County Map My County (RCIT), Planning Layers Agricultural Preserves https://gis1.countyofriverside.us/Html5Viewer/?viewer=MMC_Public , accessed August 31, 2022.

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 11 ends

4.2.5 Proposed Project Impact Analysis

Development of the Proposed Project will have no impact agricultural resources . Based on an examination of the analysis, findings, and conclusions of the Adopted MND , implementation of the proposed modifications would not substantially increase the severity of significant impacts previously identified, nor would new significant impacts related to agricultural resources that were not identified in the Adopted MND .

Implementation of the Project would not result in significant impacts to Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance; conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or a Williamson Act contract; or result in loss or conversion of farmland or forest land because these resources do not exist within the area impacted by the Project.

4.3 Air Quality

New Potentially
Significant
Impact
New Mitigation
Required Reduced Impact No New Impact
Would the project
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard??
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
e) Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) affecting a substantial number of people? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒

4.3.1 Summary of MND Conclusions

4.3.A The Project would develop 35 residential units and would not produce substantially more criteria pollutant emissions than would occur under buildout of the project site under the existing Light Industrial General Plan designation and that were assumed as a basis for the AQMP because of the potential for fewer heavy-duty truck trips and emissions from industrial processes. Furthermore, the proposed project includes a General Plan Amendment to change the project site from Light Industrial to Medium Density Residential, Medium High Density Residential, and High Density Residential. Upon approval of this General Plan Amendment, the project site would be consistent with the underlying assumptions used for future AQMP

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 12 ends

updates. Additionally, the City uses the SCAQMD thresholds for determining the potential significant impacts a project may have on air quality. T he proposed project would not generate emissions that would exceed the SCAQMD thresholds.

4.3.B Emissions resulting from the Project construction and operations will not exceed criteria pollutant thresholds established by the SCAQMD for emissions of any criteria pollutant.

Impacts are less than significant for construction and operations emissions.

4.3.C The project would not exceed SCAQMD thresholds for construction or operations.

Accordingly, the proposed project would not result in a cumulatively considerable increase in emissions of nonattainment pollutants or their precursors (e.g., VOC and NOx for O3,). Thus, pursuant to the SCAQMD CEQA Handbook cumulative impacts would be less than significant.

4.3.D Proposed construction activities would not generate emissions in excess of site-specific Localized Significance Thresholds ( LSTs); therefore, site -specific project construction impacts would be less than significant.

4.3.E Land uses and industrial operations that typically are associated with odor complaints include agricultural uses, wastewater treatment plants, food-processing plants, c hemical plants, composting, refineries, landfills, dairies, and fiberglass molding. The proposed project would not include any of these land uses and instead would develop 35 residential dwelling units, which are not a land use typically associated with odor complaints. Therefore, it is not anticipated that any operational sources under the project would result in objectionable odors, and any odor impacts resulting from the proposed project would be less than significant.

4.3.2 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts

There are no unavoidable adverse impacts identified in the Adopted MND .

4.3.3 Applicable General Plan Policies

PPP 4.3-1 The Project is required to comply with the provisions of South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 403, “ Fugitive Dust.” Rule 403 requires implementation of best available dust control measures during construction activities that generate fugitive dust, such as earth moving and stockpiling activities, grading, and equipment travel on unpaved roads.

PPP 4.3-2 The Project is required to comply with the provisions of South Coast Air Quality District Rule 431.2, “Sulphur Content and Liquid Fuels .” The purpose of this rule is to limit the sulfur content in diesel and other liquid fuels for the purpose of both reducing the formation of sulfur oxides and particulates during combustion and to enable the use of add-on control devices for diesel fueled internal combustion engines.

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 13 ends

PPP 4.3-3 The Project is required to comply with the provisions of South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 1113 , “Architectural Coatings” Rule 1113 limits the release of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) into the atmosphere during painting and application of other surface coatings.

PPP 4.3-4 The Project is required to comply with the provisions of South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 1186 “PM10 Emissions from Paved and Unpaved Roads and Livestock Operations” and Rule 1186.1, “Less‐Polluting Street Sweepers.” Adherence to Rule 1186 and Rule 1186.1 reduces the release of criteria pollutant emissions into the atmosphere during construction.

4.3.4 Applicable Adopted MND Mitigation Measures

As described in the Adopted MND , impacts related to air quality were determined to be less than significant and no mitigation was identified or required in the Adopted.

No substantial changes in the environment related to air quality will occur with the Project modifications that would lead to more significant impacts, and no new mitigation measures are required.

4.3.5 Proposed Project Impact Analysis

To determine the impacts of construction and operations air quality emissions the CalEEMod program was used to model both the approved and proposed projects’ estimated emissions. The proposed project’s air quality emissions as indicated in Table 4.3 -1 (Construction Emissions) and Table 4.3 -2 (Operational Emissions) will remain below the City’s screening thresholds and SCAQMD’s significance thresholds for air quality and therefore be less than significant.

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 14 ends

Table 4.3-1: Summary of Peak Construction Emissions

Source Emissions (lbs/day)
VOC/ROG NOX CO SOX PM10 PM2.5
Approved Project Maximum Daily
Emissions

22.1 36.0 34.4 0.06 9.49 5.47
Proposed Project Maximum Daily
Emissions

41.6 36.0 34.4 0.06 9.49 5.47
SCAQMD Regional Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55
Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO NO NO
Source: CalEEMod Datasheets Appendix A

Table 4.3-2: Summary of Peak Operational Emissions

Source Emissions (lbs/day)
VOC/ROG NOX CO SOX PM10 PM2.5
Approved Project Maximum Daily
Emissions

3.03 1.25 9.92 0.02 1.58 0.43
Proposed Project Maximum Daily
Emissions

5.79 2.39 19.0 0.04 3.02 0.82
SCAQMD Regional Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55
Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO NO NO
Source: CalEEMod Datasheets Appendix A

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 15 ends

4.4 Biological Resources

New Potentially
Significant
Impact
New Mitigation
Required Reduced Impact No New Impact
Would the project
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special‐status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
f) Conflict with the provisions of an Adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒

4.4.1 Summary of MND Conclusions

4.4.A Based on the Adopted MND the Project site is within the MSHCP but not located in the Burrowing Owl Survey Area or Narrow Endemic Plant Species Survey Area (NEPSSA).

Additionally, the Project site does not occur within a Criteria Cell and/or Cell Group, Core and/or Linkage Area, Criteria Area Plant Species Survey Area (CAPSSA), Mammal Survey Area, Invertebrate/Delhi Sands Flower -Loving Fly Survey Area, or Amphibian Survey Area. However, there is the potential for nesting birds, raptors (e.g., Swainson’s hawk), and burrowing owls to be located on the project site prior to construction. As such, the proposed project would implement MM-BIO-1, which requires pre-construction surveys for burrowing owls and MM -BIO -2 which requires pre-construction surveys for nesting birds, raptors, and prior to the start of any ground disturbing activities to reduce potential impacts to these species. Therefore, with incorporation of MM-BIO-1 and MM -BIO-2 impacts to sensitive species would be less than significant.

4.4.B The Biological Report conducted for the Adopted MND concluded that the Project site does not contain any native vegetation communities, including special-status vegetation communities, or riparian habitat. Additionally, the Biological Report found that t he entire property is disturbed, with vegetated areas dominated by non -native, ruderal

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 16 ends

species. Therefore, the proposed Project would have no impacts on special -status vegetation communities or riparian habitat.

4.4.C The Biological Report concluded that the Project site does not contain any state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.). The Project site does not contain jurisdictional waters. Therefore, the proposed Project would have no impact on state or federally protected wetlands. 6

4.4.D There are no wildlife corridors present on-site and the proposed project is not expected to impede regional wildlife movement or impact any MSHCP-designated corridors or habitat linkages. As such, the proposed project is not expected to have a substantial impact to habitat fragmentation and regional wildlife movement. The Adopted MND found that the site supports nesting opportunities for common migratory bird species therefore MM-BIO-2 which requires pre-construction surveys for nesting birds, raptors, and prior to the start of any ground disturbing activities to reduce potential impacts to these species. With implementation of MM -BIO-2 impacts would be less than significant.

4.4.E The General Biological Report indicated the presence of a single coast live oak tree on the site, the City of Jurupa Valley includes provisions for the protection and conservation of oak and other native tree and floral species within the City to protect t he natural diversity. MM-BIO-3 for dedication of Open Space Lot and Tree Maintenance and MM - BIO-4 Oak Tree Replacement are required for protection of the oak tree. With the implementation of MM-BIO-3 and MM-BIO-4 the project would be consistent with all relevant goals and policies within the City’s General Plan, the Jurupa Area Plan, and the Western Riverside County MSHCP regarding the preservation and protection of biological resources.

4.4.F The probability of MSHCP identified species to inhabit the project site is considered low due to past and existing disturbances on-site. With implementation of MM-BIO- 1 and MM-BIO-2, that would require pre-construction burrowing owl and nesting bird, raptor surveys along with the implementation of MM -BIO-3 and MM -BIO-4 for the protection of the live oak the proposed project would be clear of these species before construction and would not conflict with the MSHCP. Furthermore, PPP 4.4- 1 would require payment of mitigation fees consistent with the MSHCP and PPP

4.4-2 would require the proposed project to comply with applicable measures in the MSHCP. Therefore, impacts would be considered less than significant.

4.4.2 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts

There are no unavoidable adverse impacts identified in the Adopted MND .

6 MSHCP Consistency and Biology Report: Appendix B of the Adopted MND.

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 17 ends

4.4.3 Applicable General Plan Policies

PPP 4.4-1 The Project is required to pay mitigation fees pursuant to the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MHSCP) as required by Municipal Code Chapter 3.80.

4.4.4 Applicable Adopted MND Mitigation Measures

As described in the Adopted MND , the following mitigation measures were identified.

MM-BIO-1 Pre-Construction Burrowing Owl Survey / Burrowing Owl Protection . A 30 -day pre - construction survey for burrowing owls is required prior to future ground -disturbing activities (e.g., vegetation clearing and grubbing, tree removal, site watering, equipment staging, etc.) to ensure that no owls have colonized the site in the days or weeks preceding the ground-disturbing activities. If burrowing owls have colonized the project site prior to the initiation of ground-disturbing activities, the project proponent will immediately inform the RCA and the Wildlife Agencies and will need to coordinate in the future with the RCA and the Wildlife Agencies, including the possibility of preparing a Burrowing Owl Protection and Relocation Plan, prior to initiating ground disturbance.

If ground-disturbing activities occur, but the site is left undisturbed for more than 30 days, a pre -construction survey will again be necessary to ensure that burrowing ow l have not colonized the site since it was last disturbed. If burrowing owls are found, the same coordination described above will be necessary.

MM-BIO-2 Nesting Bird Protection . As feasible, vegetation clearing should be conducted outside of the nesting season, which is generally identified as February 1 through August 31. If avoidance of the nesting season is not feasible, then a qualified biologist shall conduct a nesting bird s urvey within three days prior to any disturbance of the site, including disking, vegetation grubbing, and grading. If active nests are identified, the biologist shall establish suitable buffers around the nests, and the bu ffer areas shall be avoided until the nests are no longer occupied and the juvenile birds can survive independently from the nests.

4.4.5 Proposed Project Impact Analysis

Development of the Proposed Project will have no new impact on biological resources.

Although BUOWs were not observed during the focused surveys, the survey area does contain suitable burrows and habitat that could become occupied by BUOW prior to implementation of the Modified Project. Therefore, Mitigation Measure MM -BIO-1 per the Adopted MND requiring a 30 -day pre - construction clearance survey would be required to reconfirm the absence of BUOWs. Biological Resources impacts would remain less than significant with the implementation of Mitigation Measures MM-BIO-1 and MM-BIO-2.

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 18 ends

As part of the review for the proposed modified MSHCP Consistency and Biological Report (Biological Report) was completed by LSA dated January 2024 (Appendix B) and found no changes in the site or proposed Project plan that would create new significant impacts. The Biological Report found that the single live oak identified in the Adopted MND is located outside the Project site boundary and no impacts are anticipated with the Project implementation to the oak tree. Therefore, as there will be no impacts to the live oak MM-BIO-03, MM-BIO-4, and COS 1.2 are no longer applicable to the proposed Project.

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 19 ends

4.5 Cultural Resources

New Potentially
Significant
Impact
New Mitigation
Required Reduced Impact No New Impact
Would the project
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to §15064.5? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
c) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒

4.5.1 Summary of MND Conclusions

The Approved Project’s Adopted Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) found impact related to Cultural Resources to be less than significant with mitigation incorporated. The conclusions included are from the IS/MND are discussed here.

4.5.A The EIC records search and literature review revealed 18 cultural resources recorded within one mile of the Project Site. The nearest prehistoric resource was documented approximately 1,495 meters north-northeast of the site. None of the recorded resources will be impacted by the proposed Project. In addition, research failed to identify any National Register of Historic Places properties; no California State Landmarks; no California Register of Historical Resources; nor any California Points of Historical Interest in the immediate vicinity that will be impacted as a result of the Project.

A pedestrian survey of the entire project area was conducted as part of LSA’s Cultural Resources Assessment. The survey found that the project site has been subjected to decades of orchard cultivation and surface disturbance from weed abatement disking.

Structural rubble, landscape dumping, and modern refuse were noted on the surface throughout the project site. Standing ruins of two buildings were documented on the property.

Although the structures were evaluated and determined not to meet the definition of a historic structure per CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5, the potential exists that unidentified significant historic deposits (e.g. a privy pit or intact refuse deposit dating prior to the 1920s) may be present that are related to the occupation of these structure since the 1900s and earlier. Because of this potential to encounter buried historic deposits, MM-CR-1 Archaeological Monitoring is required.

4.5.B There were no cultural resources present on the project site that qualify as an archaeological resource as defined by CEQA, and no other potential archaeological resources were encountered during the historical and archaeological surveys. However, there is still the potential to disturb a previously unidentified archeological resource on the project site that could be significant. As such, the proposed project would implement MM-CR-1 archeological monitoring, MM-CR-2 archeological treatment plan,

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 20 ends

and MM-CR-3 final report are required and implement appropriate measures for the treatment of archeological resources if they are discovered on the project site. With implementation of these mitigation measures impacts would be less than significant.

4.5.C The project site is not currently, nor has it historically been used as a cemetery; thus, there is a low probability of encountering human remains during ground -disturbing activities.

As required by PPP 4.5-1, any unanticipated discoveries of human remains require handling in accordance with California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98, which states that in the event that human remains are discovered during construction, construction activity shall be halted, and the area shall be protected until consultation and treatment can occur as prescribed by law. With implementation of PPP 4.5-1, impacts to human remains would be less than significant.

4.5.2 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts

There are no unavoidable adverse impacts identified in the Adopted MND .

4.5.3 Applicable General Plan Policies

There are no applicable General Plan Policies identified in the Adopted MND.

4.5.4 Applicable Adopted MND Mitigation Measures

As described in the Adopted MND , the following mitigation measures were identified. Red Text is added as a result of Addendum #1 to the Adopted MND.

MM-CR-1: Archaeological Monitoring: Prior to issuance of grading permits, the Permit Applicant shall provide evidence to the City of Jurupa Valley Community Development Department that a qualified professional archaeologist (Professional Archaeologist) that is listed on the City of Jurupa Valley Cultural Resources Consultant List or the Cultural Resource Consultant List maintained by the County of Riverside Planning Department, has been contracted to implement Archaeological Monitoring for the area of impact for the Project. Monitoring shall be conducted in coordination with the Consulting Tribe(s), defined as a Tribe that initiated the tribal consultation process for the Project as provided for in Public Resources Code §21080.3.1(b) (“AB52”) and has not opted out of the AB 52 consultation process, and has completed AB 52 consultation with the City.

Monitoring shall address the details of all ground -disturbing activities and provides procedures that must be followed to avoid or reduce potential impacts on cultural, archaeological, and tribal cultural resources to a level that is less than significant.

A fully executed copy of the Archaeological Monitoring Agreement shall be provided to the City of Jurupa Valley Planning Department to ensure compliance with this measure.

If the resource is significant, Mitigation Measure CR‐2 shall apply.

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 21 ends

MM-CR-2: Archeological Treatment Plan: The Project Archaeologist shall prepare and implement a treatment plan to protect the identified archaeological resource(s) from damage and destruction. The treatment plan shall be per CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f) for historical resources and Public Resources Code § 21083.2(b) for unique archaeological resources. Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment.

If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include implement ing archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource and subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. If historic Native American tribal cultural resources are involved, the Treatment Plan shall be coordinated with the Consulting Native American Tribe(s) as described in Mitigation Measure TCR-1 through TCR-3 of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for MA21143 and Addendum #1 to the MND MA23357.

MM-CR-3: Final Report: A final report containing the significance and treatment findings shall be prepared by the Project Archaeologist and submitted to the City of Jurupa Valley Community Development Department and the Eastern Information Center, University of California, Riverside. If a historic tribal cultural resource is involved, a copy shall be provided to the Consulting Native American Tribe(s) as described in Mitigation Measure TCR-1 through 3 of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for MA21143 and Addendum #1 to the MND MA23357.

4.5.5 Proposed Project Impact Analysis

The modified Project does not propose any changes that would impact Cultural Resources than what was originally evaluated under the Approved Project Adopted MND and MMRP. However, there is still the potential to disturb a previously unidentified archeological, Tribal Cultural, and paleontological resources on the project site that could be significant. As such, the Modified Project would implement MM-CR-1 that would require archeological monitoring and MM -CR-2 that would implement appropriate measures for the treatment of archeological resources if they were discovered on the Project site, and MM-CR-3 requiring a final report would be implemented. Cultural Resource impacts would remain less than significant with the implementation of Mitigation Measures MM-CR-1 through MM-CR-3.

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 22 ends

4.6 Energy

New Potentially
Significant
Impact
New Mitigation
Required Reduced Impact No New Impact
Would the project
a) Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒

4.6.1 Summary of MND Conclusions

The Approved Project’s Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) found impact related to Energy to be less than significant.

4.6.A Construction Energy Analysis
Construction of the Project would require the use of fuel and electric powered equipment and vehicles for construction activities. The majority of activities would use fuel powered equipment and vehicles that would consume gasoline or diesel fuel. Heavy construction equipment (e.g., dozers, graders, backhoes, dump trucks) would be diesel powered, while smaller construction vehicles, such as pick -up trucks and personal vehicles used by workers would be gasoline powered. The majority of electricity use would be from power tools. The anticipated construction schedule assumes the Project would be built in approximately 14 months. The consumption of energy would be temporary in nature and would not represent a significant demand on available supplies. There are no unusual characteristics that would necessitate the use of fuel or electricity that would be less energy efficient than at comparable construction sites in the region or State.

Starting in 2014, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) adopted the nation's first regulation aimed at cleaning up off -road construction equipment such as bulldozers, graders, and backhoes. These requirements ensure fleets gradually turnover the oldest and dirtiest equipment to newer, cleaner models and prevent fleets from adding older, dirtier equipment. As such, the equipment used for Project construction would conform to CARB regulations and California emissions standards as fuel efficiencies gradually rise.

It should also be noted that there are no unusual Project characteristics or construction processes that would require the use of equipment that would be more energy intensive than is used for comparable activities; or equipment that would not conform to current emissions standards (and related fuel efficiencies). Equipment employed in construction of the Project would therefore not result in inefficient wasteful, or unnecessary consumption of fuel.

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 23 ends

In addition, as required by state law 7, idling times of construction vehicles is limited to no more than five minutes, thereby minimizing, or elimi nating unnecessary and wasteful consumption of fuel due to unproductive idling of construction equipment.

Equipment employed in construction of the Project would therefore not result in inefficient wasteful, or unnecessary consumption of fuel.

Operation Energy Analysis
Energy consumption in support of or related to Project operations would include transportation energy demands and operational energy demands.

Transportation Energy Demands
Energy that would be consumed by Project‐generated traffic is a function of total vehicles miles traveled (VMT) and estimated vehicle fuel economies of vehicles accessing the Project site. The Project will result in 1,161,285 VMT and an estimated annual fuel consumption of 44,665 gallons of fuel.8

Enhanced fuel economies realized pursuant to federal and state regulatory actions, and related transition of vehicles to alternative energy sources (e.g., electricity, natural gas, biofuels, hydrogen cells) would likely decrease future gasoline fuel demands per VMT.

Location of the Project proximate to regional and local roadway systems tends to reduce VMT within the region, acting to reduce regional vehicle energy demands. As supported by the preceding discussions, Project transportation energy consumption would not be considered inefficient, wasteful, or otherwise unnecessary.

Operational Energy Demands
Occupancy of the single -family residences would result in the consumption of natural gas and electricity. Energy demands are estimated at 759,599 kBTU/year of natural gas and 179,055 kWh/year of electricity. 9 Natural gas would be supplied to the Project by SoCalGas and electricity would be supplied by SCE. The Project proposes single -family homes reflecting contemporary energy efficient/energy conserving designs and operational programs. The Project does not p ropose uses that are inherently energy intensive and the energy demands in total would be comparable to other single -family land use projects of similar scale and configuration. Lastly, the Project will comply with the applicable Title 24 standards. Compli ance itself with applicable Title 24 standards will ensure that the Project energy demands would not be inefficient, wasteful, or otherwise unnecessary.

In summary, as supported by the preceding analyses, neither construction nor operation of the Project would result in wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy, or wasteful use of energy resources.

7 California Code of Regulations Title 13, Motor Vehicles, section 2449(d)(3) Idling. 8 Appendix A, Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis. (avg 26 mpg passenger car) 9 Appendix A, Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis.

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 24 ends

4.6.B The California Energy Commission provides oversight for the preparation of rules and regulations for the conservation of energy such as Appliance Energy Efficiency, Building Energy Efficiency, Energy Supplier Reporting, and State Energy Management. The regulations directly applicable to the Project are Building Energy Efficiency Standards, Title 24, Part 6, and CALGreen Title 24, Part 11. These regulations include but are not limited to the use of energy efficient heating and cooling systems, water conserving plumbing, and water-efficient irrigation systems. The Project is required to demonstrate compliance with these regulations as part of the building permit and inspection process.

With implementation of these measures’ impacts would be less than significant.

4.6.2 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts

There are no unavoidable adverse impacts identified in the Adopted MND .

4.6.3 Applicable General Plan Policies

PPP 4.5-1 The project is required to comply with the applicable provisions of California Health and Safety Code §7050.5 as well as California Public Resources Code §5097, et. seq.

4.6.4 Applicable Adopted MND Mitigation Measures

As described in the Adopted MND , impacts related to Energy were determined to be less than significant and no mitigation measures were identified.

No substantial changes in the environment related to energy will occur with the Project modifications that would lead to more significant impacts, and no new mitigation measures are required.

4.6.5 Proposed Project Impact Analysis

To determine the potential energy impacts of the modified Project CalEEMod was run with the increase in dwelling units. The CalEEMod Datasheets are included as Appendix A to this Addendum. Data from the CalEEMod output for VMT, electricity and natural gas use was used to determine if the increases associated with the Pr oject would be wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy or conflict with state of local plans for renewable energy or energy efficiency.

Transportation Energy Demands
Energy that would be consumed by Project‐generated traffic is a function of total vehicles miles traveled (VMT) and estimated vehicle fuel economies of vehicles accessing the Project site. The Project will result in 1, 482,893 VMT and an estimated annual fuel consumption of 57,034 gallons of fuel.10

10 Appendix A, CalEEMod Datasheets. (avg 26 mpg passenger car)

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 25 ends

Operational Energy Demands
Occupancy of the single -family residences would result in the consumption of natural gas and electricity. Energy demands are estimated at 2,382,809 kBTU/year of natural gas and 625,729 kWh/year of electricity. 11 Natural gas would be supplied to the Project by SoCalGas and electricity would be supplied by SCE. The Project proposes single-family homes reflecting contemporary energy efficient/energy conserving designs and operational programs. The Project does not p ropose uses that are inherently energy intensive and the energy demands in total would be comparable to other single -family land use projects of similar scale and configuration. Lastly, the Project will comply with the applicable Title 24 standards. Compli ance itself with applicable Title 24 standards will ensure that the Project energy demands would not be inefficient, wasteful, or otherwise unnecessary.

Based on an examination of the analysis, findings, and conclusions of the Adopted MND , although implementation of the proposed modifications would increase the energy use as compared to the approved Project, the proposed Project’s increases are directly related to the increase in housing units and would not substantially increase the severity of significant impacts previously identified, nor would new significant impacts related to energy that were not identified in the Adopted MND.

11 Appendix A, Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis.

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 26 ends

4.7 Geology and Soils

New Potentially
Significant
Impact
New Mitigation
Required Reduced Impact No New Impact
Would the project
a) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving:
1) Strong seismic ground shaking? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
2) Seismic‐related ground failure, including liquefaction? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ 3) Landslides? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and
potentially result in on‐ or off‐site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18‐1‐B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating direct or indirect substantial risks to life or property?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒

4.7.1 Summary of MND Conclusions

4.7.A To minimize potential damage to the proposed project structures caused by seismic hazards, all construction would comply with the latest CBC standards as required by PPP

4.7-1. Implementation of the CBC standards, including provisions for seismic building designs, would further reduce impacts associated with seismic ground shaking and seismic-related ground failure. Therefore, impacts from the exposure of people or property to potential substantial adverse effects from earthquake, seismic ground shaking, as well as seismic -related ground failure, or landslides would be less than significant.

4.7.B A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan would be prepared before construction begins, and a Water Quality Management Plan is required to address post- construction soil erosion. These plans would be used to identify best management practices (e.g., bioretention basins/flow-through planters, landscape design, silt screening, fiber filtration rolls) to minimize off-site sediment transport and erosion for the duration of the proposed project.

Incorporation of Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan best management practices would implement methods to direct and detain stormwater on the project site and

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 27 ends

reduce loss of topsoil via stormwater runoff. Implementation of these measures would reduce soil erosion and the loss of topsoil during construction and operation of the proposed project would be less than significant.

4.7.C The Geotechnical Evaluation indicates that the soil deposits underlying the property are not susceptible to liquefaction. As a mandatory condition of Project approval, the Project would be required to conduct site preparation and grading as well as construct the proposed structures in accordance with the approved recommendations included in the Geotechnical Evaluation prepared for the Project. These measures in addition to implementation of current CBC standards, including provisions for seismic building designs, would ensure that proposed project impacts associated with liquefaction and lateral spreading would be less than significant.

4.7.D The Geotechnical Report indicated that on-site earth materials exhibit a low expansion potential as classified in accordance with CBC Section 1803.5. Project adherence to expansive soil recommendations outlined within the Geotechnical Report as well as PPP 4.7-1 that requires compliance with standards and requirements contained in the CBC for the design of the proposed buildings, would ensure that impacts related to expansive soil would be less than significant.

4.7.E The proposed project would not include use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems. Wastewater treatment and collection services would be provided to the project site by the Jurupa Community Services District. Therefore, no impacts related to this issue would occur.

4.7.F General Plan Figure 4 -18- Paleontological Sensitivity, indicates that the site has a high sensitivity (Ha) designation for finding paleontological resources12 therefore mitigation measures MM-GEO-1 for paleontological monitoring and MM-GEO-2 for paleontological treatment plan are required.

4.7.2 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts

There are no unavoidable adverse impacts identified in the Adopted MND .

4.7.3 Applicable General Plan Policies

PPP 4.7-1 As required by Municipal Code Section 8.05.010, the Project shall comply with the most recent edition of the California Building Code which requires the Project to comply with the approved recommended seismic design requirements contained in the Geotechnical Evaluation, EEI Engineering Solutions and be incorporated in the construction of each structure, to preclude significant adverse effects associated with seismic hazards.

12 City of Jurupa Valley, General Plan, Conservation and Open Space Element, Figure 4-18, Paleontological Sensitivity.

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 28 ends

4.7.4 Applicable Adopted MND Mitigation Measures

MM-GEO-1 Paleontological Monitoring. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, a qualified paleontologist shall be retained to observe ground -disturbing activities and recover fossil resources as necessary when construction activities will impact the older Quaternary Alluvium. The Paleontologist will attend the pre -grade conference and establish procedures and protocols for paleontological monitoring and to temporarily halt ground -disturbing activi ties to permit sampling, evaluation, and recovery of any discovery. Substantial excavations below the uppermost layers (more than 3 feet below surface) should be monitored. Sediment samples should be recovered to determine the small-fossil potential of the site. If a discovery is determined to be significant, additional excavations and salvage of the fossil may be necessary to ensure that any impacts to it are mitigated to a less than significant level.

MM-GEO-2 Paleontological Treatment Plan . Prior to the issuance of grading permits, a qualified paleontologist shall be retained to observe ground -disturbing activities and recover fossil resources as necessary when construction activities will impact the older Quaternary Alluvium. The Paleontologist will attend the pre -grade conference and establish procedures and protocols for paleontological monitoring and to temporarily halt ground -disturbing activities to permit sampling, evaluation, and recovery of any discovery. Substantial excavations below the uppermost layers (more than 3 feet below surface) should be monitored. Sediment samples should be recovered to determine the small-fossil potential of the site. If a discovery is determined to be significant, additional excavations and salvage of the fossil ma y be necessary to ensure that any impacts to it are mitigated to a less than significant level.

4.7.5 Proposed Project Impact Analysis

The Project site remains in the same physical condition as it did in 2022 when the MND for the Approved Project was adopted. The Modified Project does not propose any changes that would impact Geology and Soils than what was originally evaluated under the Approved Project and compliance with MM-GEO-1, MM-GEO-2, and PPP 4.7-1 are required.

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 29 ends

4.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions

New Potentially
Significant
Impact
New Mitigation
Required Reduced Impact No New Impact
Would the project
a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the
environment?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation Adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒

4.8.1 Summary of MND Conclusions

4.8.A The net GHG emissions associated with buildout of the proposed project with PPPs and PDFs would not exceed the City’s screening threshold of 3,000 MT CO 2e per year.

Therefore, the proposed project would have a less than significant impact from GHG emissions.

4.8.B The proposed project would not actively interfere or conflict with any future City - mandated, state -mandated, or federally mandated retrofit obligations enacted or promulgated to legally require residential development city-wide, state-wide, or nation- wide to assist in meeting state -Adopted GHG emissions reduction targets. Therefore, the proposed project’s impacts on GHG would be less than significant and the proposed project would not conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation Adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions.

4.8.2 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts

There are no unavoidable adverse impacts identified in the Adopted MND .

4.8.3 Applicable General Plan Policies

PPP 4.8-1 Prior to issuance of the first residential building permit, the Project Applicant shall submit energy usage calculations in the form of a Title 24 Compliance Report to the City of Jurupa Valley Building & Safety Department showing that the Project will be constructed in compliance with the most recently Adopted edition of the applicable California Building Code Title 24 requirements.

PPP 4.8-2 As required by Municipal Code Section 9.283.010, Water Efficient Landscape Design Requirements, prior to the approval of landscaping plans, the Project proponent shall prepare and submit landscape plans that demonstrate compliance with this section.

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 30 ends

4.8.4 Applicable Adopted MND Mitigation Measures

As described in the Adopted MND , impacts related to greenhouse gas emissions were determined to be less than significant and no mitigation measures were identified.

4.8.5 Proposed Project Impact Analysis

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 31 ends

4.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials

4.9.1 Summary of MND Conclusions

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 32 ends

Therefore, impacts related to the construction and operational phases of the proposed project would be less than significant.

4.9.E The Project site is not located within an airport compatibility zone.

4.9.G According to the General Plan13, the Project site is not located within a high wildfire hazard area. (Also refer to analysis under Issue 4.20, Wildfire).

4.9.2 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts

There are no unavoidable adverse impacts identified in the Adopted MND .

4.9.3 Applicable General Plan Policies

There are no General Plan Policies identified in the Adopted MND .

13 City of Jurupa Valley, General Plan Safety Element, Figure 8-10: Wildfire Severity Zones in Jurupa Valley.

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 33 ends

4.9.4 Applicable Adopted MND Mitigation Measures

There are no mitigation measures identified in the Adopted MND .

4.9.5 Proposed Project Impact Analysis

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 34 ends

4.10 Hydrology and Water Quality

d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒

4.10.1 Summary of MND Conclusions

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 35 ends

violate water quality standards or waste discharge requirements during construction, and impacts would be less than significant.

4.10.C In the proposed condition, the existing drainage path will drain towards the water quality and underground infiltration basin located at the southwest corner of the site.

During construction, the Project is also required to implement a Stormwater Pollution Control Plan per PPP 4.10-1.

4.10.2 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts

There are no unavoidable adverse impacts identified in the Adopted MND .

4.10.3 Applicable General Plan Policies

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 36 ends

The BMPs may include, but are not limited to, the following and may, among other things, require new developments or redevelopments to do any of the following:

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 37 ends

4.10.4 Applicable Adopted MND Mitigation Measures

As described in the Adopted MND , impacts related to hydrology and water quality were determined to be less than significant and no mitigation measures were identified.

4.10.5 Proposed Project Impact Analysis

The Adopted MND and related implementing actions established goals and policies for development of the Project. Development of the Proposed Project will be constructed in light of the policies of the General Plan, Municipal Code, BMPs and the approved Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 38 ends

Jurupa Valley City CouncilFebruary 6, 2025

Jurupa Valley City Council
February 6, 2025