Page - 1 -
REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
OF THE JURUPA VALLEY CITY COUNCIL
Thursday, February 6, 2025
Study Session: 6:00 p.m.
Regular Meeting: 7:00 p.m.
City Council Chamber
8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509
1. 6:00 PM - CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL FOR STUDY SESSION ● Brian Berkson, Mayor
● Chris Barajas, Mayor Pro Tem
● Armando Carmona, Council Member
● Veronica Sanchez, Council Member
● Guillermo Silva, Council Member
2. STUDY SESSION
A. PRELIMINARY DESIGN PRESENTATION FOR NEW CITY HALL
ANNEX BUILDING
Presented by Paul Toor, Director of Public Works/City Engineer A. As a courtesy to those in attendance, we ask that cell phones be turned off or set to their silent mode and that you keep talking to a minimum so that all persons can hear the comments of the public and City Council.
B. A member of the public who wishes to speak under Public Comments must fill out a “Speaker Card” and submit it to the City Clerk BEFORE the Mayor calls for Public Comments on an agenda item. Each agenda item up will be open for public comments before taking action. Public comments on subjects that are not on the agenda can be made during the “Public Appearance/Comments” portion of the agenda.
C. Members of the public who wish to comment on the CONSENT CALENDAR may do so during the Public Comment portion of the Agenda prior to the adoption of the Consent Calendar.
D. As a courtesy to others and to assure that each person wishing to be heard has an opportunity to speak, please limit your comments to 3 minutes.
Page - 2 -
3. 7:00 PM - CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL FOR REGULAR MEETING ● Brian Berkson, Mayor
● Chris Barajas, Mayor Pro Tem
● Armando Carmona, Council Member
● Veronica Sanchez, Council Member
● Guillermo Silva, Council Member
4. INVOCATION
5. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
6. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
7. PRESENTATIONS
A. RIVERSIDE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL SERVICES –
INTRODUCTION OF “PET OF THE MONTH”
B. RECOGNITION TO HAKAN JACKSON FOR HIS DEDICATED
SERVICE ON THE PLANNING COMMISSION
8. PUBLIC APPEARANCE/COMMENTS
9. INTRODUCTIONS, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, COUNCIL COMMENTS AND
ANNOUNCEMENTS
10. CITY COUNCIL MEMBER ORAL/WRITTEN REPORTS REGARDING
REGIONAL BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
A. MAYOR BRIAN BERKSON
1. UPDATE ON THE RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY BOARD
MEETING OF JANUARY 23, 2025
Persons wishing to address the City Council on subjects other than those listed on the Agenda are requested to do so at this time. A member of the public who wishes to speak under Public Appearance/Comments OR the Consent Calendar must fill out a “Speaker Card” and submit it to the City Clerk BEFORE the Mayor calls for Public Comments on an agenda item. When addressing the City Council, please come to the podium and state your name and address for the record. While listing your name and address is not required, it helps us to provide follow -up information to you if needed. In order to conduct a timely meeting, we ask that you keep your comments to 3 minutes. Government Code Section 54954.2 prohibits the City Council from taking action on a specific item until it appears on an agenda.
Page - 3 -
2. UPDATE ON THE METROLINK / SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY BOARD WORKSHOP MEETING
OF JANUARY 24, 2025
3. UPDATE ON THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION
COMMISSION – WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY PROGRAMS
AND PROJECTS COMMITTEE MEETING OF JANUARY 27, 2025
4. UPDATE ON THE INTERAGENCY COORDINATING COUNCIL
MEETING HELD JANUARY 31, 2025
5. UPDATE ON THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF
GOVERNMENTS – TRANSPORTATION POLICY COMMITTEE
MEETING OF FEBRUARY 6, 2025
B. MAYOR PRO TEM CHRIS BARAJAS
1. UPDATE ON THE WESTERN RI VERSIDE COUNCIL OF
GOVERNMENTS EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING OF
FEBRUARY 3, 2025
C. COUNCIL MEMBER GUILLERMO SILVA
1. UPDATE ON THE WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY - REGIONAL
CONSERVATION AUTHORITY MEETING OF FEBRUARY 3, 2025
13. CITY MANAGER’S UPDATE
14. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. JANUARY 16, 2025 REGULAR MEETING
15. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. COUNCIL APPROVAL OF A MOTION TO WAIVE THE READING OF
THE TITLE AND TEXT OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
INCLUDED IN THE AGENDA
Requested Action: That the City Council waive the reading of the title and text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. In accordance with Government Code Section 34934, the title of each ordinance is included on the published agenda and a copy of the full ordinance has been available to the public online on the City’s website and will be available in print at the meeting prior to the introduction or passage of the ordinance.
Page - 4 -
COUNCIL MEMBERS MAY REMOVE ITEMS FROM TH E CONSENT
CALENDAR FOR DISCUSSION, OR TO ASK QUESTIONS, OR MAKE A
COMMENT ON THE ITEM
If a Council Member wishes to vote “no” or “abstain” on a Consent Calendar item but does not wish to discuss, ask questions or make a comment, the Council Member may state that they wish to vote “no” or “abstain” on the item and the minutes and certification of the vote will show that the Council Member voted “no” or “abstain.”
B. ORDINANCE NO. 2025-01
Requested Action: That the City Council conduct a second reading and adopt Ordinance No. 2025-01, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
V ALLEY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 3.70 OF THE JURUPA
V ALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE, WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY
TRANSPORTATION UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE PROGRAM, TO
UPDATE PARTICIPATION IN THE WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY
TRANSPORTATION AND UNIFORM MITIGATION F EE (TUMF)
PROGRAM AND FINDING THIS ORDINANCE EXEMPT FROM CEQA
C. ORDINANCE NO. 2025-02
Requested Action: That the City Council conduct a second reading and adopt Ordinance No. 2025-02, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
V ALLEY, CALIFORNIA, ACTING IN ITS CAPACITY AS THE
LEGISLATIVE BODY OF CITY OF JURUPA V ALLEY COMMUNITY
FACILITEIS DISTRICT NO. 2023 -001 (SEQUANOTA HEIGHTS)
AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX THEREIN
D. CONSIDERATION OF CHECK REGISTER IN THE AMOUNT OF
$5,415,321.49
Requested Action: That the City Council ratify the check registers dated January 2, 9, 16, and 23, 2025 as well as the payroll registers dated January 3 and 17, 2025.
E. APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN DE ANZA COUNTRY
SHOPPING CENTER, LP AND THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY FOR
MAINTENANCE OF CITY PARKWAYS FOR THE K -MART SITE
REDEVELOPMENT MA 22087 PROJECT LOCATED AT THE
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LIMONITE AVENUE AND DE ANZA PLAZA
INTERSECTION
Page - 5 -
1. The City Council approve the agreement between De Anza Country Shopping Center, LP. and the City of Jurupa Valley for maintenance of parkways; and
2. Authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement in substantially the form and format attached and as approved by the City Attorney; and
3. Accept Performance Bond No. LICX3003922 in the amount of $126,638.58 for parkway Improvements.
F. ACCEPTANCE OF THE OFFER OF THE RIGHT -OF-WAY EASEMENT
DEDICATION FOR VAN BUREN MARKETPLACE ON RUTILE STREET
AND VAN BUREN BOULEVARD (CONTROL MANAGEMENT, INC.);
(APN 167-330-006, 167-330-010, 167-330-015, 167-110-039)
1. Requested Action: That the City Council accept the offer of dedication of an easement for public road and drainage purposes, including public utility and public services purposes, over the areas as shown on Exhibit B of DED23-004.
2. Authorize the Director of Public Works and City Clerk to sign the Acceptance of Dedication for DED23-004.
G. APPROVAL OF TRACT MAP NO. 37857; LAS PALMAS LOCATED NORTH OF 45 TH STREET BETWEEN OPAL STREET AND PACIFIC AVENUE,
ACCEPTANCE OF OFFERS OF DEDICATION, APPROVAL OF
SUBDIVISION AGREEMENTS, AND ACCEPTANCE OF
IMPROVEMENT BONDS
1. Requested Action: That the City Council approve Tract Map 37857 and accept the dedication as follows:
a. Accept the real property described as an easement for street, public utility and drainage purposes together with the right of ingress and egress for emergency vehicles within Lot “A” (Majesty Lane), Lot “B” (La Brisa Street), Lot “C” (Areca Lane), Lot “D” (El Granate Street), and Lots “E” through “L.”
b. Accept the dedication for Lot “37” for basin and water quality purposes.
2. Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign Tract Map 37857.
3. Approve and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Subdivision Agreements; and
Page - 6 -
4. Accept the surety bonds for construction of related improvements and survey monumentation.
H. AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CERTAIN OBSOLETE CITY
RECORDS
Requested Action: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2025-01, entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CI TY OF JURUPA
VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF
CERTAIN OBSOLETE CITY RECORDS
I. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF
JURUPA VALLEY AND STC TRAFFIC, INC. FOR DESIGN SERVICES FOR TWO TRAFFIC SIGNALS (CIP # 23107)
Requested Action: That the City Council approve the Professional Services Agreement between the City of Jurupa Valley and STC Traffic, Inc., of Carlsbad, California in the amount of $149,725.76, plus a 10% contingency of $14,973 for Design Services for Traffic Signals at the intersection of Rubidoux Boulevard and 24th Street, and the intersection of Wineville Road and Riverside Drive, CIP #23107 and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement in substantially the form and format attached to the staff report as approved by the City Attorney.
J. AGREEMENT WITH CIVIC SOLUTIONS FOR THE PREPARATION OF
THE RUBIDOUX TOWN CENTER PLAN
Requested Action: That the City Council approve an Agreement with Civic Solutions, Inc. (CSI) for the preparation of the Rubidoux Town Center Plan in an amount not to exceed $396,145 and authorize the City Manager to sign the Agreement on the City Council’s behalf.
16. CONSIDERATION OF ANY ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT
CALENDAR
17. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER CALLING A SPECIAL ELECTION; DECLARING THE RESULTS OF THE ELECTION; AND APPROVING
FORMATION AND LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES FOR CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. PS 2024 -012
(PUBLIC SAFETY, WEST COAST SELF STORAGE) GENERALLY
LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF CLAY STREET AND
GENERAL ROAD
1. Requested Action: That the City Council open the public hearing and take testimony, if any.
Page - 7 -
2. Following the public hearing, staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2025-12, entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF FORMATION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, TO ESTABLISH
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT NO. PS 2024 -012 (PUBLIC SAFETY, WEST COAST
SELF-STORAGE), TO AUTHORIZE THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL
TAX THEREIN, AND TO SUBMIT THE ESTABLISHMENT OF AN
APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT AND THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES
TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS THEREOF; AND
3. That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2025-13, entitled:
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
JURUPA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, CALLING A SPECIAL
ELECTION AND SUBMITTING TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS
OF CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT NO. PS 2024 -012 (PUBLIC SAFETY, WEST COAST
SELF STORAGE) PROPOSITIONS REGARDING THE
ESTABLISHMENT OF AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT AND THE
ANNUAL LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX WITHIN THE COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT; AND
4. That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2025-14, entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
JURUPA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE RESULTS
OF A SPECIAL ELECTION IN CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. PS 2024 -012 (PUBLIC
SAFETY, WEST COAST SELF STORAGE) AND DIRECTING THE
RECORDING OF A NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN; AND
5. That the City Council conduct a first reading and introduce Ordinance No. 2025-04, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
JURUPA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, ACTING IN ITS CAPACITY AS
THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTICT NO. PS 2024 -012 (PUBLIC
SAFETY, WEST COAST SELF STORAGE) AUTHORIZING THE
LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX THEREIN
Page - 8 -
B. PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THE ANNEXATION OF TER RITORY
TO THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89 -1-CONSOLIDATED (THE
“DISTRICT”) AS ZONE JJ (VAN BUREN MARKETPLACE) AND THE
LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN SUCH
TERRITORY; LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF V AN
BUREN BOULEVARD AND RUTILE STREET
Requested Action: That the City Council open the public hearing, receive any public testimony, and adopt Resolution No. 2025-15, entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF
TERRITORY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF VAN
BUREN BOULEVARD AND RUTILE STREET, TO CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.
89-1-CONSOLIDATED AS ZONE JJ (VAN BUREN MARKETPLACE),
CONFIRMING A DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT, ORDERING THE
IMPROVEMENTS AND THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF
ASSESSMENTS WITHIN SUCH TERRITORY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024 - 25 PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF PART 2 OF DIVISIO N 15 OF
THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE AND AS
PROVIDED BY ARTICLE XIII D OF THE CALIFORNIA
CONSTITUTION
18. COUNCIL BUSINESS
A. WARMINGTON RESIDENTI AL PROJECT 7586 JURU PA ROAD
(MA23357); ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION GRANTI NG FINAL
APPROVAL OF PROJECT, INCLUDING DENSITY BONUS
APPLICATION (DB) NO. 24001, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (TTM) NO. 38888, AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT (SDP) NO. 23172, WITH
DENIAL OF EITHER ONE OR TWO WAIVERS OF D EVELOPMENT
REQUIREMENTS; OVERRULE PLANNING COMMISSION’S DENIAL OF
MA23357; AND APPROVE ADDENDUM TO MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION; (APPLICANT: WARMINGTON RESIDENTIAL)
1. Requested Action: That the City Council adopt one of two Resolutions:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 2025 -16, approving the Project but denying the requested waiver of landscaping requirements of Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Sections 9.240.550(E)(13)(B) and Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Section 9.240.550(E)(5 ), which Resolution is entitled:
Page - 9 -
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF JURUPA VALLEY RESCINDING THE PLANNING
COMMISSION’S DENIAL OF MASTER APPLICATION NO.
23357 (PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2024-
20); APPROVING MASTER APPLICATION NO. 23357
CONSISTING OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 38888
(TTM 38888) AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO.
23172 (SDP 23172), APPROVING A DENSITY BONUS
APPLICATION NO. 24001 (DB24001) TO PERMIT THE
CONSTRUCTION OF A PROJECT CONSISTING OF 67
SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED HOMES AT 7 586 JURUPA
ROAD (APN 183 -030-014) ALL SUBJECT TO 1) THE
DENIAL OF THE WAIVERS REQUESTED FOR THE
LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS OF JURUPA VALLEY
MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 9.240.550(E)(13)(B) AND
JURUPA VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION
9.240.550(E)(5), AND 2) CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL; AND
APPROVING AN ADDENDUM TO THE MITIGATED
NEGATIVE DECLARATION PURSUANT TO SECTION
15164 OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY ACT GUIDELINES (WARMINGTON
RESIDENTIAL PROJECT)
b. OR Adopt Resolution No. 2025 -17, approving the Project but denying the requested waivers of both 1) the one -story home requirements of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Sections
9.240.550(E)(3), and 2) the landscaping requirements of Jurupa Valley Municipal C ode Sections 9.240.550(E)(13)(B) and Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Section 9.240.550(E)(5), which Resolution is entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF JURUPA VALLEY RESCINDING THE PLANNING
COMMISSION’S DENIAL OF MASTER APPLICATION NO.
23357 (PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2024-
20); APPROVING MASTER APPLICATION NO. 23357
CONSISTING OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 38888
(TTM 38888) AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO.
23172 (SDP 23172), APPROVING DENSITY BONUS
APPLICATION NO. 24001 (DB24001) TO PE RMIT THE
CONSTRUCTION OF A PROJECT CONSISTING OF 67
SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED HOMES AT 7586 JURUPA
ROAD (APN 183 -030-014) ALL SUBJECT TO 1) THE
DENIAL OF THE WAIVERS REQUESTED FOR BOTH THE
ONE-STORY REQUIREMENTS OF JURUPA VALLEY
MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 9.240.550(E)(3) AND THE
LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS OF JURUPA VALLEY
Page - 10 -
MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS 9.240.550(E)(13)(B), AND
9.240.550(E)(5), AND 2) CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL; AND
APPROVING AN ADDENDUM TO THE MITIGATED
NEGATIVE DECLARATION PURSUANT TO SECTION
15164 OF THE CAL IFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY ACT GUIDELINES (WARMINGTON
RESIDENTIAL PROJECT)
19. COUNCIL MEMBER REQUESTS FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
20. CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT
21. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS AND COMMENTS
22. ADJOURNMENT
Adjourn to the Regular Meeting of February 20, 2025 at 7:00 p.m. at the City Council Chamber, 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and Government Code Section 54954.2, if you need special assistance to participate in a meeting of the Jurupa Valley City Council or other services, please contact Jurupa Valley City Hall at (951) 332 -6464. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are needed will assist staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be m ade to provide accessibility to the meeting or service.
Agendas of public meetings and any other writings distributed to all, or a majority of, Jurupa Valley City Council Members in connection with a matter subject to discussion or consideration at an open meeting of the City Council are public records. If such writing is distributed less than 72 hours prior to a public meeting, the writing will be made available for public inspection at the City of Jurupa Valley, 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92 509, at the time the writing is distributed to all, or a majority of, Jurupa Valley City Council Members. The City Council may also post the writing on its Internet website at www.jurupavalley.org.
Agendas and Minutes are posted on the City’s website at www.jurupavalley.org.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 14.A
-1-
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING
OF THE JURUPA VALLEY CITY COUNCIL
January 16, 2025
1. 6:00 PM - CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL FOR CLOSED SESSION ● Brian Berkson, Mayor
● Chris Barajas, Mayor Pro Tem
● Armando Carmona, Council Member
● Veronica Sanchez, Council Member
● Guillermo Silva, Council Member
Mayor Brian Berkson called the closed session meeting to order at 6:04 p.m.
2. CONVENE TO CLOSED SESSION
A. PUBLIC COMMENTS PERTAINING TO CLOSED SESSION ITEMS
There were no public comments regarding the closed session items.
B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – POTENTIAL LITIGATION.
The City Council met in closed session with the City Attorney pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2).(3) with respect to one matter of potential litigation. A point has been reached where, in the opinion of the City Attorney, based on existing facts and circumstances, there is a significant exposure to litigation involving the City with re spect to the proposed project at 7586 Jurupa Road based on four letters concerning the Project: 1) October 7, 2024 from Linda Klein, attorney for Warmington Residential to Assistant City Attorney Maricela Marroquin; 2) November 27, 2024 from Sonja Trauss, Executive Director, YIMBY Law to Planning Commission; 3) December 5, 2024 from , Dylan Casey, Executive Director, and James Lloyd, Director of Planning and Investigations, California Housing Defense Fund to Planning Commission; and 4) December 11, 2024 fro m Linda Klein, attorney for Warmington Residential to Planning Commission. The four letters are available for public inspection from the Office of the City Clerk.
3. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION
A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF A NY REPORTABLE ACTION S IN CLOSED
SESSION
City Attorney Peter Thorson announced that no reportable actions were taken.
RETURN TO AGENDA
-2-
4. 7:00 PM - CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL FOR REGULAR MEETING ● Brian Berkson, Mayor
● Chris Barajas, Mayor Pro Tem
● Armando Carmona, Council Member
● Veronica Sanchez, Council Member
● Guillermo Silva, Council Member
Mayor Brian Berkson called the regular meeting to order at 7:05 p.m.
5. INVOCATION was given by Pastor Todd Dannelley, Calvary Chapel Jurupa Valley.
6. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE was led by Vicki Wasko.
7. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Chris Barajas, seconded by Council Member Guillermo Silva, to approve the Agenda.
Ayes: C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, V. Sanchez, G. Silva Noes: None
Absent: None
8. PRESENTATIONS
A. RECOGNITION TO CITY CLERK VICKI WASKO FOR HER MANY
YEARS OF FAITHFUL SERVICE UPON HER RETIREMENT FROM THE
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
Madison Baca from State Assembly Leticia Castillos’s office and Colin Markovich from Senator Sabrina Cervantes ’office presented Ms. Wasko with Certificates of Recognition. Mayor Berkson presented Ms. Wasko with a City Proclamation and a Certificate of Recognition from the honorable Karen Spiegel, representing Riverside County Board of Supervisors, District 2 . Mayor Berkson thanked Ms.
Wasko for her many years of faithful service and wished her well on her upcoming retirement.
9. PUBLIC APPEARANCE/COMMENTS
Carmina Ortiz, stated that she lives in Arabella Ranch and she and her neighbors were without power for six straight days due to Southern California Edison’s power outage. She stated that there was no communication from SCE and she still does not know the reason for the outage. She urged the City Council to work with SCE on this issue as it has created an intolerable situation for residents.
Carol Manettas stated that SCE owes every resident in Jurupa Valley an explanation regarding their policy to turn off residential power for over a week. She outlined the
-3-
hardships many residents faced including no ability to leave their res idences when elevators stopped working, loss of medications that require refrigeration, and lack of heat.
She asked that the Council hold a town hall meeting to address this issue which would allow the public to receive thorough and honest answers from SCE.
Colin Markovich, representing Senator Sabrina Cervantes, provided a legislative update.
He stated that Senator Cervantes will be advocating for the residents of Jurupa Valley and has already introduced her first piece of legislation. He stated that t he Senator has been briefed on the SCE power shutoffs and she is working to prevent such incidents in the future by working with SCE, local leaders, and state legislative representatives.
Daniel Silvas expressed concern regarding the ongoing SCE power outages. He stated that many residents experienced over eight days without power. Many residents are senior citizens that suffered a great deal of personal hardships. He urged the Council to address this issue and to work with SCE to prevent such outages in the future.
Lydia Mendoza voiced concern that the SCE power outages are often unrelated to weather or winds and she would like the City Council to follow up with SCE on their process or policies. She asked for an update on the Mobile Home grant funding status.
Irene Sanchez stated that she lives at the Mission Village Senior apartment complex and for eight days they had no power. This situation created severe hardships for the senior citizens that live there. She was disappointed that no one came to check on the seniors to see if they were OK. She asked that these residents be reimbursed for their financial losses during the outage.
David Daneshmayeh referred to a previous meeting he had with Mayor Berkson and Paul Toor, Public Works Director, regarding expanding Pyrite Street to four lanes and placing a barrier in the center roadway. He asked for an update on this issue as an accident occurred at this location.
Gabriel Sanchez stated that as a resident of the Bravo community, he is grateful to Council Member Carmona for bringing attention to his community when they lost power for nine days. He provided examples of the hardships he and other members of the community had to deal with during the outage.
Margaret Rigby stated that she res ides at the Mission Village Senior apartments and the recent power outage lasted for eight days. She noted that the entire apartment complex is electric and the way the residents suffered was heartbreaking. She explained that many of these residents are low-income and the elevator did not work, their food perished, and residents were “left high and dry.”
Liz Hernandez thanked Council Member Armando Carmona for his help during the power outage as he helped provide meals for some of the residents. She urged the City Council to help resolve this issue.
-4-
George Ruiz stated that it is easy to “point fingers”, however, these power outages are something that is unprecedented. He suggested using the City’s Operations Center and/or volunteers to go out in the co mmunity to check on senior citizens and disabled residents that need assistance.
Zoe Hanlon thanked Council Member Armando Carmona for providing meals for residents during the power outage. She stated that this situation cannot continue and something needs to change.
Sean Barker stated that he suffered for eight days with no electricity. He stated that SCE has no answers for residents and often times provides conflicting answers. He complained that SCE does not maintain their infrastructure properly wh ich often causes the outages.
What they offer for compensation is not acceptable and m ore has to be done to fix this issue.
Mayor Brian Berkson thanked everyone for their comments, stating that the Council will stay engaged regarding this issue. He added that he has asked for a special meeting with representatives from SCE to allow residents the opportunity to express their concerns.
10. INTRODUCTIONS, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, COUNCIL COMMENTS AND
ANNOUNCEMENTS
Council Member Armando Carmona discussed the recent power outages and what he and others did to try and assist residents who were impacted. He acknowledged the City’s Fire Department, El Torito Meat Market, El Campos Mariscos , Diablos Micheladas Mexican Grill, and Farmers Boys who helped respond with meals and beverages. He discussed his calls to SCE and his concerns for the medically vulnerable. He stated that his goal is to hold SCE accountable, encourage reimbursement for residents who suffered economically, and find long-term solutions.
Mayor Pro Tem Chris Barajas agreed with Council Member Carmona’s comments, stating that what SCE did was unacceptable and the City Council will continue to work with SCE to hold them accountable . He is work ing with other impacted cities to compile a list of actions by SCE that were done incorrectly according to CPUC regulations. He thanked the veterans and community volunteers who manned the VFW for the entire duration of the power outage to provide meals and a place to stay warm. He noted that the VFW was the No. 1 resource center in the state of California as more than 2,000 individuals visited the VFW since last Tuesday.
Council Member Veronica Sanchez stated that she was also impacted by the power outage, which also impacted the City’s small businesses. She thanked the VFW and Reach Out for their community support. She encouraged residents to check up on their elderly neighbors, to stand together, and continue to reach out to the City Council.
Mayor Brian Berkson stated that it was his absolute pleasure to serve as Mayor for Jurupa Valley for 2025. He stated that the City is on a positive trajectory and he looks forward to working together for the betterment of the community. He addressed the recent power
-5-
outages and agreed that SCE needs to be held accountable. He suggested that the school district could be another resource for residents who are in need of a place to stay warm or find basic services and he would like to see the school district consider opening their doors the next time there is a prolonged power outage. He suggested that the City consider purchasing generators that could be lent out, especially to the disabled. He added that he will be working to set up a community meeting with representatives from SCE. He added that the City will be working on traffic issues, a future homeless shelter, code enforcement/quality of life issues, and changing the date of the City’s community parade , which would allow the inclusion of marching ba nds. He looks forward to his tenure as mayor and continuing to provide support to residents’ concerns.
11. CITY COUNCIL MEMBER ORAL/WRITTEN REPORTS REGARDING
REGIONAL BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
A. MAYOR BRIAN BERKSON
1. Mayor Brian Berkson announced that the Metrolink / Southern California Regional Rail Authority – Audit and Finance Committee meeting of January 10, 2025 was canceled.
2. Mayor Brian Berkson gave an update on the Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Review Committee meeting of January 16, 2025.
B. MAYOR PRO TEM CHRIS BARAJAS
1. Mayor Pro Tem Chris Barajas gave an update on the Western Riverside Council of Governments - Strategic Planning Session of January 10, 2025.
12. CITY MANAGER’S UPDATE
City Manager Rod Butler announced that volunteers are still needed for Riverside County’s annual Point-in-Time-Count of the area’s homeless population. He pointed out that Sheriff Deputies and City Code Enforcement accompany the volunteer s. Interested individuals may sign up online at the City’s website. He announced that the City is accepting applications for their annual public service grants that are typically awarded to non -profit social service organizations that provide services to Jurupa Valley residents. The deadline to apply is January 31, 2025. Information on how to apply is available on the City’s website. He announced that City Hall will be closed on Monday, January 20, 2025 in observance of Martin Luther King, Jr. Day. City Hall will resume regular office hours on Tuesday, January 21, 2025.
-6-
A. AB1234 REPORT
Michael Flad, Assistant City Manager reported that Mayor Brian Berkson and Mayor Pro Tem Chris Barajas attended the California Contract Cities Association’s Legislative Tour in Sacramento from January 5, 2025 - January 7, 2025. Travel and accommodations were provided. Mr. Flad reported that the trip included meetings with Rob Bonta, California Attorney General, and David Zisser, Assistant Deput y Director of the state’s Housing, Community Development Department (HCD).
Topics discussed included setting next year’s legislative platform.
Mayor Pro Tem Chris Barajas reported that as the legislative chair of the California Contract Cities Association , he is working on the following two bills: 1) a truck camera bill which would prevent trucks from restricted truck routes; and 2) a bill that would prohibit foreign and/or corporate investment in U.S. real estate such as the buyout of entire housing communities.
13. SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT UPDATE
Mayor Brian Berkson announced that this item would be continued to the February 20, 2025 meeting.
14. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. DECEMBER 19, 2024 REGULAR MEETING
A motion was made by Council Member Guillermo Silva, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Chris Barajas , to approve the Minutes of the regular meeting of December 19, 2024.
Ayes: C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, V. Sanchez, G. Silva Noes: None
Absent: None
15. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. COUNCIL APPROVAL OF A MOTION TO WAIVE THE READING OF
THE TITLE AND TEXT OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
INCLUDED IN THE AGENDA
Requested Action: That the City Council waive the reading of the title and text of all ordinances and re solutions included in the agenda. In accordance with Government Code Section 34934, the title of each ordinance is included on the published agenda and a copy of the full ordinance has been available to the public online on the City’s website and will be available in print at the meeting prior to the introduction or passage of the ordinance.
-7-
COUNCIL MEMBERS MAY REMOVE ITEMS FROM TH E CONSENT
CALENDAR FOR DISCUSSION, OR TO ASK QUESTIONS, OR MAKE A
COMMENT ON THE ITEM
If a Council Member wishes to vote “no” or “abstain” on a Consent Calendar item but does not wish to discuss, ask questions or make a comment, the Council Member may state that they wish to vote “no” or “abstain” on the item and the minutes and certification of the vote will show that the Council Member voted “no” or “abstain.”
B. AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CERTAIN OBSOLETE CITY RECORDS – REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR
FURTHER DISCUSSION
Requested Action: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2025-01, entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF
CERTAIN OBSOLETE CITY RECORDS
C. APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN CFT NV DEVELOPMENTS,
LLC AND THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY FOR MAINTENANCE OF
CITY PARKWAYS FOR THE CFT COMMERCIAL CENTER MA 20084
PROJECT LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF MISSION
BOULEVARD AND VALLEY WAY INTERSECTION
1. Requested Action: That City Council approve the agreements between CFT NV Developments, LLC, and the City of Jurupa Valley for maintenance of parkway along Mission Boulevard and Valley Way; and
2. Authorize the City Manager to execute the Landscape Maintenance Agreement in substantially the form and format attached to the staff report as approved by the City Attorney; and
3. Authorize th e City Manager to execute the Special Escrow Account agreement in substantially the form and format attached to the staff report as approved by the City Attorney.
D. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS REGARDING THE ANNEXATION OF
TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89 -1-CONSOLIDATED
(THE “DISTRICT”) AS ZONE JJ (VAN BUREN MARKETPLACE) AND
THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN SUCH
TERRITORY; LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF VAN
BUREN BOULEVARD AND RUTILE STREET
-8-
1. Requested Action: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2025 -02, entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
JURUPA VALLEY INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE
ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.
89-1-CONSOLIDATED AS ZONE JJ (VAN BUREN
MARKETPLACE) AND THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF
ASSESSMENTS WITHIN SUCH TERRITORY FOR FISCAL YEAR
2025-2026 PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF PART 2 OF
DIVISION 15 OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHW AYS
CODE AND ARTICLE XIII D OF THE CALIFORNIA
CONSTITUTION
2. That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2025-03, entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
JURUPA VALLEY APPROVING THE REPORT OF THE
ENGINEER REGARDING THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION O F
TERRITORY TO CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING
AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89 -1-
CONSOLIDATED AS ZONE JJ (VAN BUREN MARKETPLACE)
AND THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN
THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 89-1-
CONSOLIDATED FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026
3. That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2025-04, entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
JURUPA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION
TO ANNEX TERRITORY TO CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING MA INTENANCE DISTRICT NO.
89-1-CONSOLIDATED AS ZONE JJ (VAN BUREN
MARKETPLACE) AND TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS
WITHIN SUCH TERRITORY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025 -2026
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF PART 2 OF DIVISION 15
OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE AND
ARTICLE XIII D OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION AND
APPOINTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING PROTESTS
E. APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN LIMONITE C&C, LLC AND THE
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY FOR MAINTENANCE OF CITY PARKWAYS
FOR THE VALLEY SQUARE PM 36977 PROJECT LOCATED AT THE
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF MISSION BOULEVARD AND PYRITE STREET
-9-
INTERSECTION – REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR
FURTHER DISCUSSION
1. Requested Action: That the City Council approve the agreement between Limonite C&C, LLC and the City of Jurupa Valley for maintenance of parkways; and
2. Authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement in substantially the form and format attached to the staff report as approved by the City Attorney; and
3. Accept Performance Bond No. 4479332 in the amount of $46,000 for parkway Improvements.
F. FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE AND THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY FOR FI SCAL YEAR 2018 -2019 THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 2024-2025 – REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR
FURTHER DISCUSSION
1. Requested Action: That the City Council approve the First Amended and Restated Agreement for Professional Services between the County of Riverside and the City of Jurupa Valley for Fiscal Year 2018-2019 through Fiscal Year 2024 -2025 and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement in substantially the form and format attached to the staff report as approved by the City Attorney.
2. Authorize the Director of Finance to make appropriate budget adjustments as necessary, based on the Finance Impact section of the staff report.
G. APPROVAL OF TRACT MAP NO. 38318-1 FOR THE DISTRICT LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST COR NER OF 34 TH STREET AND WALLACE
STREET, ACCEPTANCE OF OFFERS OF DEDICATION, APPROVAL OF
SUBDIVISION AGREEMENTS, AND ACCEPTANCE OF
IMPROVEMENT BONDS
1. Requested Action: That the City Council approve Tract Map 38318 -1 and accept the dedication as follows:
a. Accept the real property described as an easement for street and public utility purposes for Lot “A” (Wallace Street) and Lot “B” (34th Street).
b. Abandon portions of Lots “A” and “B” for street and public utility purposes as shown on Parcel Map No. 10879, filed in Book 56, page 13 of Parcel maps, records of Riverside County.
-10-
2. Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign Tract Map 38318-1.
3. Approve and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Subdivision Agreements; and
4. Accept the surety bonds for construction of related improvements and survey monumentation.
H. APPROVAL OF THE THIR D AMENDMENT TO AGREE MENT WITH
RRM DESIGN GROUP FOR THE PREPARATION OF “PERMIT-READY
ACCESSORY BUILDING” (PRAB) PLANS PROJECT
Requested Action: That the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute the Third Amendment to the Agreement with RRM Design Group to prepare permit ready accessory building (PRAB) plans.
I. CONSIDERATION OF CHECK REGISTER IN THE AMOUNT OF
$6,868,865.81
Requested Action: That the City Council ratify the check registers dated November 21, and December 4, 12, and 19, 2024 as well as the payroll registers dated November 22, 30, and December 6, 20, and 31, 202
J. A RESOLUTION OF INTENTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY TO ESTABLISH CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. PS 2024 -008 (PUBLIC
SAFETY, COUNTRYSIDE ESTATES) AND TO AUTHORIZE THE LEVY
OF A SPECIAL TAX WITHIN CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. PS 2024 -008 (PUBLIC SAFETY,
COUNTRYSIDE ESTATES); GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF
AVENUE JUAN BAUTISTA, SOUTH OF MAVERICK LANE, EAST OF
LIMONITE AVENUE AND WEST OF RIVERVIEW DRIVE
Requested Action: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2025-11, entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF INTENTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY TO ESTABLISH CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. PS 2024 -008 (PUBLIC
SAFETY, COUNTRYSIDE ESTATES) AND TO AUTHORIZE THE LEVY
OF A SPECIAL TAX WITHIN CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. PS 2024 -008 (PUBLIC SAFETY,
COUNTRYSIDE ESTATES)
-11-
K. AGREEMENT FOR ON -CALL HVAC MAINTENANCE A ND REPAIR
SERVICES
1. Requested Action: That the City Council approve the agreement with Senergy Plumbing Heating and Air (“Senergy”) for On -Call HVAC Maintenance and Repair Services for an amount not to exceed $20,000 per fiscal year; and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement in substantially the form and format attached to the staff report as approved by the City Attorney.
2. Authorize the Finance Director to make appropriate budget adjustments as necessary, based on the Finance Impact section of the staff report.
A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Chris Barajas, seconded by Council Member Guillermo Silva, to approve the Consent Calendar with the exception of Items 15.B, 15.E, and 15.F , which were removed for further discussion.
Ayes: C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, V. Sanchez, G. Silva Noes: None
Absent: None
16. CONSIDERATION OF ANY ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT
CALENDAR
15.B AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CERTAIN OBSOLETE CITY
RECORDS
Council Member Armando Carmona requested that Item 15.B be removed from the Consent Calendar for further discussion. Council Member Armando Carmona questioned the request of the City’s IT Department to destroy inactive email accounts from former City employees. He asked that the City retain these records for a longer retention period of two years, depending on the City’s policy and the cost to archive.
Vicki Wasko, City Clerk, provided additional information and responded to Council’s questions.
By consensus, the City Council requested that this item be brought back at the next meeting for further review and approval.
Ayes: C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, V. Sanchez, G. Silva Noes: None
Absent: None
-12-
15.E APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN LIMONITE C&C, LLC AND THE
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY FOR MAINTENANCE OF CITY PARKWAYS
FOR THE VALLEY SQUARE PM 36977 PROJECT LOCATED AT THE
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF MISSION BOULEVARD AND PYRITE STREET
INTERSECTION
Council Member Armando Carmona requested that Item 15.E be removed from the Consent Calendar for further discussion.
Paul Toor, Director of Public Works, provided additional information and responded to Council’s questions.
A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Chris Barajas , seconded by Council Member Guillermo Silva, to approve the agreement between Limonite C&C, LLC and the City of Jurupa Valley for maintenance of parkways; authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement in substantially the form and format attached to the staff report as approved by the City Attorney; and accept Performance Bond No. 4479332 in the amount of $46,000 for parkway Improvements.
Ayes: C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, V. Sanchez, G. Silva Noes: None
Absent: None
15.F FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE AND THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY FOR FI SCAL YEAR 2018 -2019 THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 2024-2025
Council Member Armando Carmona requested that Item 15.F be removed from the Consent Calendar for further discussion.
Paul T oor, Director of Public Works, provided additional information and responded to Council’s questions.
A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Chris Barajas , seconded by Council Member Guillermo Silva , to approve the First Amended and Restated Agreement for Professional Services between the County of Riverside and the City of Jurupa Valley for Fiscal Year 2018 -2019 through Fiscal Year 2024 - 2025 and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement in substantially the form and format attached to the staff report as approved by the City Attorney; and authorize the Director of Finance to make appropriate budget adjustments as necessary, based on the Finance Impact section of the staff report.
-13-
Ayes: C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, V. Sanchez, G. Silva Noes: None
Absent: None
17. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE
APPLICABLE TRANSPORTATION UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE
(TUMF) APPLICABLE TO ALL DEVELOPMENTS IN THE CITY OF
JURUPA VALLEY AND FINDING THIS RESOLUTION EXEMPT FROM
CEQA
Staff Report presented by Paul Toor, Director of Public Works. Mr. Toor reported that this item pertains to the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). He reported that the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) administers the TUMF program to ensure that new development pays its fair share for the increased traffic that it creates. Mr. Toor outlined how the fee obligations are allocated based on needs and other factors which influence how traffic will be increased due to new development. The TUMF fee goes toward providing improvements to improve local traffic and will take effect in April, 2025.
Further discussion followed.
Chris Gray, Deputy Executive Director, WRCOG, provided additional information and responded to Council’s questions.
Mayor Brian Berkson opened the public hearing.
There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed.
A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Chris Barajas , seconded by Council Member Armando Carmona, to adopt Resolution No. 2025-05, entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY AMENDING THE APPLICABLE TRANSPORTATION
UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE (TUMF) APPLICABLE TO ALL
DEVELOPMENTS IN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY AND FINDING
THIS RESOLUTION EXEMPT FROM CEQA
Ayes: C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, V. Sanchez, G. Silva Noes: None
Absent: None
A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Chris Barajas, seconded by Council Member Armando Carmona, to introduce Ordinance No. 2025-01, entitled:
-14-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
V ALLEY AMENDING CHAPTER 3.70 OF THE JURUPA V ALL EY
MUNICIPAL CODE, WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY
TRANSPORTATION UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE PROGRAM, TO
UPDATE PARTICIPATION IN THE WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY
TRANSPORTATION AND UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE (TUMF)
PROGRAM AND FINDING THIS ORDINANCE EXEMPT FROM CEQA
Ayes: C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, V. Sanchez, G. Silva Noes: None
Absent: None
B. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER CALLING A SPECIAL ELECTION; DECLARING THE RESULTS OF THE ELECTION; AND APPROVING
FORMATION AND LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES FOR CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2023 -001
(SEQUANOTA HEIGHTS) GENERAL LY LOCATED AT THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF CANAL STREET AND OPAL STREET
Staff Report presented by Paul Toor, Director of Public Works. Mr. Toor outlined the process to establish Community F acilities District No. 2023 -001 (Sequanota Heights).
Mayor Brian Berkson opened the public hearing.
There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed.
A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Chris Barajas , seconded by Council Member Guillermo Silva, to adopt Resolution No s. 2025-06 and 2025 -07, entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-06 - A RESOLUTION OF FORMATION OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, TO
ESTABLISH CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FACILIT IES
DISTRICT NO. 2023 -001 (SEQUANOTA HEIGHTS), TO ESTABLISH AN
APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT THEREFORE, TO AUTHORIZE THE LEVY
OF A SPECIAL TAX THEREIN, AND TO SUBMIT THE
ESTABLISHMENT OF AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT AND THE LEVY
OF SPECIAL TAXES TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS THEREOF; AND RESOLUTION NO. 2025-07 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, CALLING A
SPECIAL ELECTION AND SUBMITTING TO THE QUALIFIED
ELECTORS OF CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT NO. 2023 -001 (SEQUANOTA HEIGHTS) PROPOSITIONS
REGARDING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF AN APPROPRIATIONS
-15-
LIMIT AND THE ANNUAL LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX WITHIN THE
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
Ayes: C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, V. Sanchez, G. Silva Noes: None
Absent: None
At the request of the mayor, the City Clerk announced that one owner cast one ballot. All votes cast were in favor of the special taxes.
A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Chris Barajas, seconded by Council Member Guillermo Silva, to adopt Resolution No. 2025-08, entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE RESULTS OF A SPECIAL
ELECTION IN CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FACILITEIS
DISTRICT NO. 2023 -001 (SEQUANOTA HEIGHTS) AND DIRECTING
THE RECORDING OF A NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN
Ayes: C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, V. Sanchez, G. Silva Noes: None
Absent: None
A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Chris Barajas, seconded by Council Member Guillermo Silva, to introduce Ordinance No. 2025-02, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY CO UNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, ACTING IN ITS CAPACITY AS THE
LEGISLATIVE BODY OF CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY COMMUNITY
FACILITEIS DISTRICT NO. 2023 -001 (SEQUANOTA HEIGHTS)
AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX THEREIN
Ayes: C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, V. Sanchez, G. Silva Noes: None
Absent: None
Mayor Brian Berkson called a short recess at 9:15 p.m.
Mayor Brian Berkson reconvened the meeting at 9:25 p.m.
C. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER APPEAL OF PLANNING
COMMISSION’S DENIAL OF MASTER APPLICATION (MA) NO.
23357: DENSITY BONUS APPLICATION (DB) NO. 24001, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (TTM) NO. 38888, AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
(SDP) NO. 23172, AND ADDENDUM TO MITIGATED NE GATIVE
DECLARATION FOR A SUBDIVISION OF 6.92 ACRES OF LAND INTO
-16-
67 LOTS FOR SINGLE -FAMILY DETACHED HOMES; LOCATION:
7586 JURUPA ROAD (APN:183-030-014); (APPLICANT:WARMINGTON
RESIDENTIAL)
Staff Report presented by Annette Tam, Planning Manager. Ms. Tam summarized the project, which is to allow a subdivision of 6.92 acres into 67 lots for single - family homes. Ms. Tam reported that the entitlements include the approval of a tentative tract map, a site development permit, and a density bonus to allow for 12 additional units and approval of 34 waivers of development standards. Ms. Tam reported that the City received a letter from the applicant’s attorney on October 7, 2024. On October 16, 2024, the City received an email from HCD , that they received a request for technical assistance from the applicant. On October 29, 2024, the City met with HCD to discuss the project. On November 12, 2024, the City received a Notice of Potential Violation from HCD. Ms. Tam reported that at their November 13, 2024 meeting, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to deny the project . Ms. Tam gave an overview of the project, the City’s inclusionary housing ordinance, and the environmental review and mitigation measures.
Mayor Brian Berkson voi ced a concern that the project is located next to Camino Real at Jurupa Road, which is currently one lane. The goal from the City’s standpoint is that the developer improve Camino Real to improve it from one to two lanes. He expressed his view that the developer is asking for a waiver from this requirement which will make the traffic congestion unfeasible.
Alexander DeGood, Cox, Castle, attorney for the developer spoke on behalf of the project and outlined the findings that would allow City to deny the project based on specific health and safety standards. He stated that the project has gone under environmental review, which did not find any issue with the street and that dedication is a concession that the developer is allowed under current density bonus law. He indicated that the City does not have discretion to deny this concession as the project is under the regime of state density bonus law. He asked that the City rescind the Planning Commission’s denial and approve the project.
George Ruiz stated that as a former member of the Planning Commission, he believes the City is being backed into a corner to approve this project. He voiced concern that the project will create a major traffic issue. He asked the Council to deny this project.
Roberto Ramirez stated that this is a perfect example of “developer greed” as this project only includes three low-income homes. He urged the Council to deny this project based on health and safety concerns as the developer refuses to improve Camino Real and is asking for 34 City waivers to build the project.
Daniel Silva stated that the additional traffic the project will cause could cause future traffic accidents. He asked the Council to deny the project.
-17-
Rosa Sandoval stated that she lives on Jurupa Road and she is extremely concerned about this project as there is no sidewalk along Jurupa Road and adding 67 homes in this area is outrageous. She urged the Council to deny the project.
Joe Oftelie, representing Warmington Residential Homes, provided additi onal information regarding the road improvements which will be added which include widening of Camino Real with landscaping, trails, and sidewalks.
Manuel Gonzales, Principal Engineer, provided additional information and responded to Council’s questions.
Council Member Armando Carmona stated that his introduction to this project was a letter from the developer threatening litigation , which is not typical when a developer wants to work with the City in good faith. He asked why the developer is not doing more to provide affordable housing.
Further discussion followed.
Mayor Brian Berkson expressed his view that by not agreeing to widen Camino Real, the developer will cause a major public safety issue and he is prepared to let the Planning Commission’s denial stand.
Council Member Armando Carmona provided a history of this parcel which was originally zoned A-1 (Agriculture). He indicated that this is an example of rezoning that has resulted in an undesirable residential project.
Council Member Guillermo Silva stated that he is not supportive of the project, however, he would like to know the ramifications of denying the project.
City Attorney Peter Thorson provided a summary of the developer’s legal position.
Further discussion followed.
Further discussion followed regarding the limited amount of parking for the project.
At the request of Council Member Guillermo Silva, Joe Perez, Assistant City Manager/Community Development Director provided the potential repercussions should the project be denied.
Mayor Pro Tem Chris Barajas reminded residents that no land in the city is safe as the state’s housing laws will continue to take away local control. Nonetheless, he has certain fiduciary duties to act in good faith and protect the City from any unnecessary financial risks.
There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed.
-18-
A motion was made by Mayor Brian Berkson, to uphold the Planning Commission’s denial of the project.
MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND
A motion was made by Mayor Brian Berkson, to r escind the Planning Commission’s denial of the project and approv e the project but deny the waivers regarding the landscape requirements set forth in Section
9.240.550(E)(13), and adopt an Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration.
MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND
A motion was made by Council Member Armando Carmona, seconded by Council Member Guillermo Silva, to rescind the Planning Commission’s denial of the project and approve the project but deny the waivers regarding the one -story and landscape requirements set forth in Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Section 9.240.550(E)(3) and Section 9.240.550(E)(13), and adopting an Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration.
AYES: CARMONA, SANCHEZ, SILVA
NOES: BARAJAS, BERKSON
ABSENT: NONE
18. COUNCIL BUSINESS
A. APPOINTMENTS TO THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY
COMMITTEE AND ANNUAL RECONFIRMATION PROCESS
Staff Report presented by Vick Wasko, City Clerk. Ms. Wasko noted that a letter of interest was submitted earlier today from Nereyda Hernandez and copies of her letter were distributed to the City Council.
Mayor Brian Berkson invited the following individuals to address the Council and share why they are interested in serving on the Community Development Advisory Committee:
Nancy Chandroo (not present)
Michele Cortez (not present)
David Goldstein
Debora h Hild
Following the applicant presentations, a motion was made by Council Member Veronica Sanchez , seconded by Council Member Armando Carmona, to appoint Nancy Chandroo to fill a scheduled vacancy on the Community Development Advisory Committee for a term expiring in December 2028.
-19-
Ayes: C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, V. Sanchez, G. Silva Noes: None
Absent: None
A motion was made by Council Member Guillermo Silva, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Chris Barajas , to re -appoint Rachel Lopez to the Community Development Advisory Committee for a term expiring in December 2028.
Ayes: C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, V. Sanchez, G. Silva Noes: None
Absent: None
A motion was made by Council Member Armando Carmona, seconded by Council Member Veronica Sanchez, to appoint Nereyda Hernandez to fill an unscheduled vacancy on the Communi ty Development Advisory Committee for a term expiring in December 2026.
A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Chris Barajas , seconded by Mayor Brian Berkson , to reconfirm the appointment s of George Ruiz and Sonia Wraich, pursuant to Ordinance No. 2019-04.
Ayes: C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, V. Sanchez, G. Silva Noes: None
Absent: None
B. APPOINTMENTS TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND ANNUAL
RECONFIRMATION PROCESS
Staff Report presented by Vick Wasko, City Clerk.
Mayor Brian Berkson invited the following individuals to address the Council and share why they are interested in serving on the Planning Commission:
Gregory Borgman (not present)
Nathan Hanlon (not present)
Christobal Rosales
Gladys Salcedo
Following the applicant presentations, a motion was made by Council Member Veronica Sanchez, seconded by Council Member Armando Carmona , to appoint Christobal Rosales to fill a scheduled vacancy on the Planning Commission for a term expiring in December 2028.
Ayes: C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, V. Sanchez, G. Silva Noes: None
Absent: None
-20-
A motion was made by Council Member Guillermo Silva, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Chris Barajas , to re -appoint Laura Shultz to the Planning Commission for a term expiring in December 2028.
Ayes: C. Barajas, B. Berkson, V. Sanchez, G. Silva
Noes: A. Carmona
Absent: None
A motion was made by Council Member Guillermo Silva, seconded by Mayor Brian Berkson , to reconfirm the appointment s of Planning Commissioner s Uriel De La Torre, Penny Newman, and Arleen Pruitt, pursuant to Ordinance No. 2013-11.
Ayes: C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, V. Sanchez, G. Silva Noes: None
Absent: None
[At this point in the meeting, City Attorney Peter Thorson announced that Council Member Guillermo Silva wished to change his vote on Item 17.C.
Following discussion, no action was taken as Mr. Thorson clarified that a resolution will be brought back at the February 6, 2025 meeting for a final vote by the City Council.]
C. APPOINTMENTS TO THE P UBLIC WORKS ADVISORY COMMITTEE
AND ANNUAL RECONFIRMATION PROCESS
Staff Report presented by Vick Wasko, City Clerk.
Mayor Brian Berkson invited the following individuals to address the Council and share why they are interested in serving on the Public Works Advisory Committee:
Jose Cuellar
Mayibel Ruiz (not present)
Rosa Sandoval
Following the applicant presentations, a motion was made by Council Member Veronica Sanchez, seconded by Council Member Armando Carmona , to appoint Rosa Sandoval to fill a sched uled vacancy on the Public Works Advisory Committee for a term expiring in December 2028.
Ayes: C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, V. Sanchez, G. Silva Noes: None
Absent: None
-21-
A motion was made by Council Member Guillermo Silva, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Chris Barajas , to re -appoint Alondra Munoz to the Public Works Advisory Committee for a term expiring in December 2028.
Ayes: C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, V. Sanchez, G. Silva Noes: None
Absent: None
A motion was made by Council Member Armand o Carmona , seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Chris Barajas , to reconfirm the appointment s of Public Works Advisory Committee Member s Robert Galindo, Mayra Jackson, and Josh Steffy, pursuant to Ordinance No. 2022-13.
Ayes: C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, V. Sanchez, G. Silva Noes: None
Absent: None
D. AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY ADDING SECTIONS 9.05.105 and 9.05.108 TO TITLE 9 (PLANNING AND ZONING) OF THE JURUPA VALLEY MUNICIPAL
CODE ESTABLISHING APPEALS PROCESSES FOR STREAMLINED,
MINISTERIAL HOUSING PROJECTS AND FOR INCOMPLETENESS
DETERMINATIONS UNDER THE PERMIT STREAMLINING ACT
Staff Report presented by Roberto Gonzalez, Principal Planner. Mr. Gonzalez reported that this action is in response to recent state leg islation to ensure the City is in compliance with three recently passed bills that create or advance streamlined approvals for specific housing projects: SB 1123, AB 2243, and AB 3122. The proposed urgency ordinance will create an appeals process for streamlined housing development projects approved ministerially. The urgency ordinance is necessary as there is insufficient time to adopt a regular ordinance before the new affordable housing laws go into effect.
Further discussion followed.
City Attorney Peter Thorson outlined the purpose of the urgency ordinance and how this procedural issue may avoid future litigation.
A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Chris Barajas , seconded by Council Member Guillermo Silva, to adopt Urgency Ordinance No. 2025-03, entitled:
AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY ADDING SECTIONS 9.05.105 AND 9.05.108 TO TITLE 9 (PLANNING AND ZONI NG) OF THE JURUPA VA LLEY MUNICIPAL
CODE ESTABLISHING AP PEALS PROCESSES FOR STREAMLINED,
MINISTERIAL HOUSING PROJECTS AND FOR INC OMPLETENESS
-22-
DETERMINATIONS UNDER THE PERMIT STREAMLINING ACT, AND
MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
Ayes: C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, V. Sanchez, G. Silva Noes: None
Absent: None
E. CONSIDER PROPOSALS FOR ENHANCEMENTS TO THE
EQUESTRIAN LIFESTYLE PROTECTION OVERLAY AND PROVIDE
DIRECTION ON WHETHER TO PROCEED WITH POSSIBLE CHANGE
Staff Report presented by Jim Pechous, Principal Planner. Mr. Pechous gave an overview of the goals and policies of the City’s Equestrian Protection Overlay and efforts to further enhance the overlay.
Further discussion followed.
Joe Perez, Assistant City Manager/Community Development Director, provided additional assistance and responded to Council’s questions.
A motion was made by Council Member Armando Carmona , seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Chris Barajas, to appropriate $30,000 for the preparation of an existing conditions analysis of the Equestrian Lifestyle Program Overlay (ELPO), and directing that the findings of the analysis be presented at a joint City Council and Planning Commission study session.
Ayes: C. Barajas, B. Berkson, A. Carmona, V. Sanchez, G. Silva Noes: None
Absent: None
F. PARADISE KNOLLS PROJECT; ACCEPTANCE OF OWNER’S
DEDICATION OF 2.75 ACRES OF PROPERTY FOR PARK AND
RECREATION PURPOSES; CONVEYANCE OF THE 2.75 -ACRE PARK
PROPERTY TO JURUPA AREA PARK AND RECREATION DISTRICT
(JARPD)
Staff Report presented by Reynaldo Aquino, Senior Planner. Mr. Aquino reported that in 2021, the City Council approved an Amendment to the Development Agreement that chan ged the developer’s obligation from providing an equestrian facility to dedicating a 2.75-acre site to the City for park and recreational uses. On January 9, 2025, the Jurupa Area Recreation and Park District approved and executed a conveyance agreement to acquire the 2.75 -acre park property from the City. Mr. Aquino described the conveyance actions that the City Council must approve to convey the park property to the Jurupa Area Recreation and Park District.
-23-
Council Member Armando Carmona asked about the parking strategy for the proposed park.
Colby Diuguid, General Manager, Jurupa Area and Recreation Park District provided additional information and responded to Council’s questions.
Michael Flad, Assistant City Manager, provided additional information on the Trails Master Plan and how it will be connected with existing City amenities.
Further discussion followed.
A motion was made by Council Member Armando Carmona , seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Chris Barajas, to adopt Resolution Nos. 2025-09 and 2024-10, entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-09 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY ACCEPTING PARK PROPERTY
WITHIN THE PARADISE KNOLLS SPECIFIC PLAN AREA PURSUANT
TO THAT CERTAIN IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDICATION OF
REAL PROPERTY PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
7050 DATED OCTOBER 6, 2022 AND RECORDED IN THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ON OCTOBER 7, 2022 AS DOCUMENT NO. 2022-0422107
RESOLUTION NO. 2025 -10 - A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN
AGREEMENT TO CONVEY 2.75 ACRES OF PARK PROPERTY TO
JURUPA AREA RECREATION AND PARK DISTRICT WITHIN
PARADISE KNOLLS SPECIFIC PLAN AREA FOR PARK AND
RECREATION PURPOSES
Roll Call:
Ayes: C. Barajas, A. Carmona, V. Sanchez, G. Silva
Noes: B. Berkson
Absent: None
19. COUNCIL MEMBER REQUESTS FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Council Member Armando Carmona requested an update on the Santa Ana River and the Trails Master Plan.
Mayor Brian Berkson requested that staff or ganize a community meeting with Southern California Edison to allow residents the opportunity to express their concerns about the recent power outages.
-24-
20. CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT
City Attorney Peter Thorson had no report.
21. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS AND COMMENTS
Mayor Brian Berkson suggested that the City needs a long-range plan on how the City can better respond to emergencies and help residents in need and the criteria needed, whether it be working with the Red Cross, School District, or other partner agencies.
Council Member Armando Carmona thanked the members of the audience for engaging with the City Council and he looks forward to serving the community in 2025.
Council Member Guillermo Silva thanked all the volunteers , local businesses, and hi s colleagues on the Council for their assistance to the community during the recent power outages. He encouraged residents to contact him with any questions or concerns.
Council Member Veronica Sanchez thanked all the volunteers and community organizations who helped during the recent power outages. She is here to serve and it has been her pleasure to help out in any way she can.
22. ADJOURNED IN MEMORY
Mayor Brian Berkson adjourned tonight’s meeting in memory of Riverside County Deputy Timothy Corlew who was killed in a traffic collision on January 8, 2025 and Melinda Day, one of Mayor Berkson’s co-workers, who passed away suddenly last night. He conveyed condolences on behalf of the City Council.
There being no further business before the City Council, Mayor Brian Berkson adjourned the meeting at 12:25 a.m. to February 6, 2025 at 7:00 pm.
Respectfully submitted,
____________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.B
-1-
12774-0009\2103249v3.doc
ORDINANCE NO. 2025-01
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF JURUPA VALLEY, AMENDING CHAPTER 3.70 OF THE
JURUPA VALLEY MUNICI PAL CODE, WESTERN
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRA NSPORTATION UNIFORM
MITIGATION FEE PROGR AM, TO UPDATE
PARTICIPATION IN THE WESTERN RIVERSIDE
COUNTY TRANSPORTATIO N AND UNIFORM
MITIGATION FEE (TUMF ) PROGRAM AND FINDIN G
THIS ORDINANCE EXEMPT FROM CEQA
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. AMENDED OF CHAPTER 3.70, TUMF. Chapter 3.70, Weste rn Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Program, of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
3.70.010. Title. This Chapter shall be known as the “Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Program of 2025.”
3.70.020 Findings. In adopting this Chapter, the City Council finds and determines that:
A. The City is a member agency of the Western River side Council of Governments (“WRCOG”), a joint powers agency comprised of the County of Riverside and 18 cities located in Western Riverside County.
B. Acting in concert, the WRCOG Member Agencies developed a plan whereby the shortfall in funds needed to e nlarge the capacity of the Regional System of Highways and Arterials in Western Riverside County (the “Regional System”) could be made up in part by a Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (“TUMF”) on future residential, commercial and industrial developme nt. A map depicting the boundaries of Western Riverside County and the Regional System is attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein as though set forth in full.
C. The City of Jurupa Valley incorporated on July 1, 2011. The City Council adopted Ordinance Nos. 2011-01 and 2011-10 adopting by reference all ordinances of the County of Riverside in effect on July 1, 2011 and all resolutions, rules and regulations of the County of Riverside implementing those ordinances on a permanent basis as provided in Government Code Section 57376.
D. As a Member Agency of WRCOG and as a TUMF Part icipating Jurisdiction, the County of Riverside participated in the preparation of a certain “Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Fee Nexus Study,” dated October 18, 2002 (the
RETURN TO AGENDA
-2-
12774-0009\2103249v3.doc
“2002 Nexus Study”) prepared in compliance with the Mitigation Fee Act (Gov. Code §§ 66000 et seq.) and adopted by the WRCOG Executive Committee.
E. The County of Riverside also participated in the second major update of the TUMF network entitled the “Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Nexus Study; 2009 Update” (“2009 Nexus Study”) pursuant to California Government Code sections 66000 et seq. (the Mitigation Fee Act), for the purpose of updating the fees. Based on the 2002 and 2009 Nexus Studies, the County of Riverside adopted and implemented Ordinance Nos. 824.7, 824.8, 824.9, 824.10, and 824.11, codified in Chapter 4.58 of the Riverside County Code of Ordinances and known as the “Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Program Ordinance of 2009,” which were adopted by reference by the City of Jurupa Valle y as described in Subparagraph C . The City later adopted Ordinance No. 2014-09 amending a portion of the Riverside County TUMF Ordinance.
F. WRCOG, with the assistance of the City of Jurupa Valley and other TUMF Participating Jurisdictions, has prepared an updated nexus study entitled “Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Nexus Study: 2016 Update” (“2016 Nexus Study”) pursuant to California Go vernment Code sections 66000 et seq . (the Mitigation Fee Act), for the purpose of updating the fees. On July 10, 2017, the WRCOG Executive Committee reviewed the 2016 Nexus Study and TUMF Program and recommended TUMF Participating Jurisdictions amend their applicable TUMF ordinances to reflect changes in the TUMF network and the cost of construction in order to update the TUMF Program.
The City Council adopted an ordinance amending this Chapter to implement the 2016 Nexus Study.
G. In 2018, the TUMF Program was altered to adopt a process in which WRCOG calculates and collects TUMF on behalf of member agencies under the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Program Ordinance of 2018.
The City Council adopted an ordinance amending thi s Chapter and allowing WRCOG to calculate and collect TUMF on behalf of the City.
H. WRCOG, with the assistance of TUMF Participating Jurisdictions, has prepared an updated nexus study entitled “Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Nexus Study: 2024 Update” (“2024 Nexus Study”) pursuant to California Government Code sections 66000 et seq. (the Mitigation Fee Act), for the purpose of updating the fees. On September 9, 2024, the WRCOG Executive Committee reviewed the 2024 Nexus Study and TUMF Program and reco mmended TUMF Participating Jurisdictions amend their applicable TUMF ordinances to reflect changes in the TUMF network and the cost of construction in order to update the TUMF Program.
I. Consistent with its previous findings made in the adoption of ordina nces amending this Chapter, the City Council has been informed and advised, and hereby finds and determines, that if the capacity of the Regional System is not enlarged and unless development contributes to the cost of improving the Regional System, the re sult will be substantial traffic congestion in all parts of Western Riverside County, with unacceptable levels of service. Furthermore, the failure to mitigate growing traffic impacts on the -3-
12774-0009\2103249v3.doc
Regional System will substantially impair the ability of public s afety services (police and fire) to respond and, thus, adversely affect the public health, safety and welfare. Therefore, continuation of a TUMF program is essential.
J. The City Council finds and determines that there is a reasonable and rational relationship between the use of the TUMF and the type of development projects on which the fees are imposed because the fees will be used to construct the transportation improvements that are necessary for the safety, health and welfare of the residential and non-residential users of the development in which the TUMF will be levied.
K. The City Council finds and determines that there is a reasonable and rational relationship between the need for the improvements to the Regional System and the type of development projects on which the TUMF is imposed because it will be necessary for the residential and non -residential users of such projects to have access to the Regional system. Such development will benefit from the Regional System improvements and the burden of such developments will be mitigated in part by payment of the TUMF.
L. The City Council finds and determines that the cost estimates set forth in the new 2024 Nexus Study are reasonable cost estimates for constructing the Regional System improvements and the facilities that compromise the Regional System, and that the amount of the TUMF expected to be generated by new development will not exceed the total fair share cost to such development.
M. The fees collected pursuant to this Chapter shall be used to help pay for the design, planning, construction of and real acquisition for the Regional System improvements and its facilities as identified in the 2024 Nexus Study. The need for the improvements and facilities is related to new development because such development results in additional traffic and creates the demand for the improvements.
N. The City Council finds and determines that the 2024 Nexus Study proposes a fair and equitable method for di stributing a portion of the unfunded costs of improvements and facilities to the Regional system.
O. The City Council hereby adopts the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Nexus Study: 2024 Update and its findings, a true, correct and complete copy of which is attached to this Ordinance as Exhibit B, and incorporated herein.
3.70.030 Definitions. For the purpose of this Chapter, the following words, terms and phrases shall have the following meanings:
A. "Class A office" means an office building that is typically characterized by high quality design, use of high end building materials, state of the art technology for voice and data, on-site support services/maintenance, and often includes full service ancillary uses such as, but not limited to, a bank, restaurant/office coffee shop, health club, printing shop, and reserved parking. The minimum requirements of an office building classified as Class A office shall be as follows: (1) minimum of three st ories (exception will be made for March JPA, where height requirements exist); (2) -4-
12774-0009\2103249v3.doc
minimum of ten thousand square feet per floor; (3) steel frame construction; (4) central, interior lobby; and (5) access to suites shall be from inside the building unless t he building is located in a central business district with major foot traffic, in which case the first floor may be accessed from the street to provide entrances/exits for commercial uses within the building.
B. "Class B office" means an office building that is typically characterized by high quality design, use of high end building materials, state of the art technology for voice and data, on-site support services/maintenance, and often includes full service ancillary uses such as, but not limited to, a ba nk, restaurant/office coffee shop, health club, printing shop, and reserved parking. The minimum requirements of an office building classified as Class B office shall be as follows: (1) minimum of two stories; (2) minimum of fifteen thousand square feet pe r floor; (3) steel frame, concrete or masonry shell construction; (4) central, interior lobby; and (5) access to suites shall be from inside the building unless the building is located in a central business district with major foot traffic, in which case t he first floor may be accessed from the street to provide entrances/exits for commercial uses within the building.
C. "Development project" or "project" means any project undertaken for the purposes of development, including the issuance of a permit for construction.
D. "Disabled veteran" means any veteran who is retired or is in process of medical retirement from military service who is or was severely injured in a theatre of combat operations and has or received a letter of eligibility for the Veterans Administration Specially Adapted Housing (SAH) Grant Program.
E. "Government/public buildings, public schools and public facilities" means any owned and o perated facilities by a government entity in accordance with Section 3.70.040(F), Exemptions. A new development that is subject to a long -term lease with a government agency for government/ public buildings, public schools, and public facilities shall apply only if all of the following conditions are met:
1. The new development being constructed is subject to a long - term lease with a government agency.
2. The project shall have a deed restriction placed on the property that limits the use to government/public fac ility for the term of the lease, including all extension options, for a period of not less than twenty (20) years .
Any change in the use of the facility from government shall trigger the payment of the TUMF in effect at the time of the change is made.
3. No less than ninety percent (90%) of the total square footage of the building is leased to the government agency during the term of deed restriction the long term and any extensions thereof.
4. The new development is constructed at prevailing wage rates.
5. A copy of the lease is provided to the applicable jurisdiction and to WRCOG.
6. Based on the facts and circumstances WRCOG determines that the intent of the lease is to provide for a long -term government use, and not to -5-
12774-0009\2103249v3.doc
evade payment of TUMF.
F. "Gross acreage" means the total property area as shown on a land division of a map of record, or described through a recorded legal description of the property. This area shall be bounded by road rights of way and property lines.
G. "Guest dwellings" and "detached second units" according to the State of California legal definition as following: 1) Complies with the State of California Department of Housing and Community Development Accessory Dwelling Unit Handbook and 2) Are ministerially approved by each jurisdiction’s local codes.
H. "Habitable structure" means any structure or part thereof where persons reside, congregate or work and which is legally occupied in whole or part in accordance with applicable building codes, and state and local laws.
I. "Industrial projec t" means any development project that proposes any industrial or manufacturing use allowed within certain zones established by the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code and ordinances of the City, including, I-P, M-S-C, M-M, M-H, M- R, M-R-A, A-1, A-P, A-2, A-D, W-E, SP, or a Specific Plan providing for industrial or manufacturing uses, or a Planned Development Overlay District providing for industrial or manufacturing uses.
J. "Long-term lease" as used in the TUMF program, shall mean a lease with a term of no less than twenty years.
K. "Low income residential housing" means "residential affordable units": (1) for rental housing, the units shall be made available, rented and restricted to "lower income households" (as defined in Health and Safety Code Section 50079.5) at an "affordable rent" (as defined in Health and Safety Code S ection 50053); and (2) for for -sale housing, the units shall be sold to "persons or families of low or moderate income" (as defined in Health and Safety Code Section 50093) at a purchase price that will not cause the purchaser's monthly housing cost to exceed "affordable housing cost (as defined in Health and Safety Code Section 50052.5). Affordable units that are rental housing shall be made available, rented, and restricted to lower income ho useholds at an affordable rent for a period of at least fifty-five years after the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for new residential development. Affordable units that are for -sale housing units shall be restricted to ownership by persons and families of low or moderate income for at least forty-five years after the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the new residential development.
L. "Mixed-use development," as used in the TUMF program, means developments with the following criteria: (1) three or more significant revenue-producing uses; and (2) significant physical and functional integration of project components.
M. "Multi-family residential unit" means a structure with two (2) or more legal independent residential dwelling units intended for human habitation.
N. "Non-profit organization" means an organization operated exclusively for exempt purposes set forth in Section 501(c)( 3) of the Internal Revenue Code, and none of its earnings may inure to any private shareholder or individual. In addition, it may not be an action organization, i.e., it may not attempt to influence legislation as a -6-
12774-0009\2103249v3.doc
substantial port of its activities and it may not participate in any campaign activity for or against political candidates. For the purposes of the TUMF program, the non -profit may be a 501(c)(3) charitable organization as defined by the Internal Revenue Service.
O. "Nonresidential unit" means retail commercial, service commercial and industrial development, which is designed primarily for non -dwelling use, but shall include hotels and motels.
P. "Recognized financing district" means a financing district as defined in the TUMF administrative plan as may be amended from time to time.
Q. "Residential dwelling unit" means a building or portion thereof used by one family and containing but one kitchen, which is designed primarily for residential occupancy including single -family and multifamily dwelli ngs. "Residential dwelling unit" shall not include hotels or motels.
R. "Retail commercial project" means any development project that proposes any retail commercial activity use not defined as a service commercial project allowed within certain zones esta blished by the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code and ordinances of the City, including R -1, R-R, R-R-O, R-1-A, R-A, R-2, R-2-A, R-3, R- 3-A, R-T, R-T-R, R-4, R-5, R-6, C-1/C-P, C-T, C-P-S, C-R, C-O, R-V-C, C-V, W-2, R-D, N-A, W-2-M, W-1, SP, a Specific Plan prov iding for retail commercial activity use not defined as a service commercial project, or a Planned Development Overlay District providing for retail commercial activity use not defined as a service commercial project, which can include any eating/dining facility residing on the retail commercial development premises.
S. "Service commercial project" means any development project that is predominately dedicated to business activities associated with professional or administrative services, and typically consi sts of corporate offices, financial institutions, legal, and medical offices eating/dining facilities, and other uses related to personal or professional services.
T. “Single-family residential unit” means each residential dwelling unit development, which is situated on one lot, which shares no common wall, foundation, or other interconnection with another dwelling unit.
U. "TUMF participating jurisdiction" means a jurisdiction in Western Riverside County, which has adopted and implemented an ordinance auth orizing participation in the TUMF program and complies with all regulations established in the TUMF administrative plan, as adopted and amended from time to time by the WRCOG.
V. "TUMF administrative plan" means that the TUMF administration plan adopted by the WRCOG executive committee May 5, 2003, as amended, setting forth detailed administration procedures and requirements for the TUMF program.
3.70.040 Establishment of the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee.
A. Adoption of TUMF Schedule. The City Council shall adopt an applicable TUMF schedule through a separate resolution, which may be amended from time to time.
-7-
12774-0009\2103249v3.doc
B. Fee Calculation. The fees shall be calculated by WRCOG according to the calculation methodology fee set forth in the WRCOG TUM F Fee Calculation Handbook adopted July 14, 2003, as amended from time to time. In addition to data in the Fee Calculation Handbook, WRCOG Staff may consider the following items when establishing the appropriate fee calculation methodology:
1. Underlying zoning of the site;
2. Land-use classifications in the latest Nexus Study;
3. Project specific traffic studies;
4. Latest standardized reference manuals such as the Institute of Traffic Engineers Trip Generation Manual;
5. Previous TUMF calculations for similar uses;
6. WRCOG staff shall approve final draft credit/reimbursement agreement prior to execution.
WRCOG shall have final determination regarding the appropriate methodology to calculate the fee based on the information provided by the local agency. In case of a conflict between the applicant, WRCOG, and/or the local agency regarding the fee calculation methodology, the dispute resolution process in the TUMF administrative plan will apply.
C. Fee Adjustment. The fee schedule may be periodically reviewed and the amounts adjusted by the WRCOG executive committee. By amendment to the resolution referenced in subsection A, the fees may be increased or decreased to reflect the changes in actual and estimated costs of the Regional System including, but not limited to, debt service, lease payments and construction costs. The adjustment of the fees may also reflect changes in the facilities required to be constructed, in estimated revenues received pursuant to this chapter, as well as the availability or lack thereof of other funds with which to construct the Regional System. WRCOG shall review the TUMF program no less than every four years after 2025.
D. Purpose. The purpose of the TUMF is to fund those certain improvements to the Regional System as depicted in “Exhibit A” and id entified in “Exhibit B” of the 2024 Nexus Study.
E. Applicability. The TUMF shall apply to all new development within the city, unless otherwise exempt hereunder.
F. Exemptions. The following types of new development shall be exempt from the provisions of this chapter and in the TUMF administrative plan:
1. Low-income residential housing as described in Section 3.70.030, Definitions, and in the TUMF administrative plan.
-8-
12774-0009\2103249v3.doc
2. Government/public buildings, public schools, and public facilities as described in Section 3.70.030, Definitions, and in the TUMF administrative plan. Airports that are public use airports and are appropriately permitted by Caltrans or other state agency.
3. Development projects which are the subject of a public facilities development agreement entered into pursuant to Government Code Section 65864 et seq., prior February 8, 2003 wherein the imposition of new fees are expressly prohibited, provided that if the term of such a development agreement is extended by amendment or by any other manner after February 8, 2003, the TUMF shall be imposed.
4. The rehabilitation and/or reconstruction of any habitable structure in use on or after January 1, 2000, provided that the same or fewer traffic trips are generated as a result thereof.
5. Guest dwellings and detached second units as described in Section
3.70.030, Definitions, and in the TUMF administrative plan.
6. Kennels (including catteries) established in connection with an existing single-family residential unit.
7. Any sanctuary, or other activity under the same roof of a church or other house of worship that is not revenue generating and is eligible for a property tax exemption (excluding concert venues, coffee/snack shops, book stores, for -profit pre -school day - cares, etc., which would be assessed TUMF.)
8. Any nonprofi t corporation or nonprofit organization offering and conducting full-time day school at the elementary, middle school or high school level for students between the ages of five and eighteen years.
9. New single -family homes, constructed by non -profit organiza tions, specially adapted and designed for maximum freedom of movement and independent living for qualified "disabled veterans," as defined in Section 3.70.030, Definitions.
10. Other uses may be exempt as determined by the WRCOG executive committee as further defined in the TUMF administrative plan.
G. Credit. Regional System improvements may be credited toward the TUMF in accordance with the TUMF administrative plan and the following:
1. Regional Tier.
a. Arterial Credits. If a developer constructs arterial improvements identified on the Regional System, the developer shall receive credit for all costs associated with the arterial component based on approved Nexus Study for the Regional System effective at the time the credit agreement is entered into. WRCOG staff must -9-
12774-0009\2103249v3.doc
pre-approve any credit agreements that deviate from the standard WRCOG approved format.
b. Other Credits. In special circumstances, when a developer constructs off-site improvements such as an interchange, bridge, or railroad grade separation, credits shall b e determined by WRCOG and the city in consultation with the developer. All such credits must have prior written approval from WRCOG. c. The amount of the development fee credit shall not exceed the maximum amount determined by the Nexus Study for the
Regional System at the time the credit agreement is entered into or actual costs, whichever is less.
2. Local Tier.
a. The local jurisdictions shall compare facilities in local fee programs against the Regional System and eliminate any overlap in its local fee program e xcept where there is a recognized financing district has been established.
b. If there is a recognized financing district established, the local agency may credit that portion of the facility identified in both programs against the TUMF in accordance with the TUMF
administrative plan.
3.70.050 Reimbursements. Should the developer construct Regional System improvements in excess of the TUMF fee obligation, the developer may be reimbursed based on actual costs or the approved Nexus Study effective at the time the agreement was entered into, whichever is less. Reimbursements shall be enacted through an agreement between the developer and the city, contingent on funds being available and approved by WRCOG. In all cases, however, reimbursements under such special agreements must coincide with construction of the transportation improvements as scheduled in the five -year Zone Transportation Improvement Program's adopted annually by WRCOG.
3.70.060 Procedures for the Levy, Collection and Disposition of Fees.
A. Authority of the Building Department. The director of building and safety, or designee, is hereby authorized to provide WRCOG with development project specifics for the calculation of TUMF in a manner consistent with the TUMF administrative plan.
B. Payment. Payment of the fees shall be as follows:
1. All fees collected hereunder shall be collected by WRCOG for deposit, investment, accounting and expenditure in accordance with the provisions of this chapter, TUMF administrative plan, and the Mitigation Fee Act.
2. The fees shall be paid at the time a certificate of occupancy is -10-
12774-0009\2103249v3.doc
issued for the development project or upon final inspection, whichever comes first (the "payment date"). However, this section should not be construed to prevent payment of the fees prior to issuance of an occupancy permit or final inspection. Fees may be paid at the issuance of a building permit, and the fee payment shall be calculated based on the fee in effect at that time, provided the developer tenders the full amount of his or her TUMF ob ligation. If the developer makes only a partial payment prior to the Payment Date, the amount of the fee due shall be based on the TUMF fee schedule in place on the Payment Date. The fees shall be calculated according to fee schedule set forth in this chapter, or resolution adopted pursuant thereto, and the calculation methodology set forth in the Fee Calculation Handbook adopted July 14, 2003, as amended from time to time.
3. The fees required to be paid shall be the fee amounts in effect at the time of payme nt is due under this chapter, not the date the ordinance adopting this chapter, or any amendment thereto, is initially adopted. The city shall not enter into a development agreement, which freezes future adjustments of the TUMF.
4. If all or part of any development project is sold prior to payment of the fee, the property shall continue to be subject to the requirement for payment of the fee. The obligation to pay the fee shall run with the land and be binding on all the successors in interest to the property.
5. Fees shall not be waived.
C. Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. The city shall not issue a certificate of occupancy for any development project until WRCOG has provided written evidence that it has collected the fee.
D. Appeals. Appeals shall be filed with WRCOG in accordance with the provisions of the TUMF administrative plan. Appealable issues shall be the application of the fee, application of credits, application of reimbursement, application of the legal action stay and appl ication of exemption.
E. Reports to WRCOG. The director of building and safety, or designee, shall prepare and deliver to the executive director of WRCOG, periodic reports as will be established under Section 3.70.070 of this chapter.
3.70.070 Appointment of the TUMF Administrator.
A. WRCOG is hereby appointed as the administrator of the transportation uniform mitigation fee program. WRCOG is hereby authorized to collect all fees generated from the TUMF within the city, and to invest, -11-
12774-0009\2103249v3.doc
account for and expend such fees in accordance with the provisions of this chapter and the Mitigation Fee Act. The detailed administrative procedures concerning the implementation of this chapter shall be contained in the TUMF Administrative Plan. Furthermore, the TUMF administrator shall use the Fee Calculation Handbook adopted July 14, 2003, as amended from time to time, for the purpose of calculating a developer's TUMF obligation. In addition to detailing the methodology for calculating all TUMF obligations of different categories of new development, the purpose of the Fee Calculation Handbook is to clarify for the TUMF administrator, where necessary, the definition and calculation methodology for uses not clearly defined in the respective TUMF ordinances.
B. WRCOG shall expend only that amount of the funds generated from the TUMF for staff support, audit, administrative expenses, and contract services that are necessary and reasonable to carry out its responsibilities and in no case shall the funds expended for salaries and benefits e xceed one percent of the revenue raised by the TUMF program. The TUMF administrative plan further outlines the fiscal responsibilities and limitations of the administrator.
3.70.080 Effect. No provisions of this chapter shall entitle any person who has already paid the TUMF to receive a refund, credit or reimbursement of such payment. This chapter does not create any new TUMF.
SECTION 2 PROCEDURAL FINDINGS. The City Council does hereby find, determine and declare that:
A. On January 16, 2025 , the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on the 2024 Nexus Study, this Ordinance amending Chapter 3.70 , and the TUMF fees set forth in Resolution No. 2025-05. The public hearing was noticed by publication in a newspaper of general circulation at least ten (10) days prior to this hearing. The City made the following documents available to the public on the City’s website at least ten (10) days prior to the public hearing: 1) 2024 Nexus Study; 2) this Ordinance amending Chapter 3.70; 3) the Resolution approving the new TUMF fees; and 4) other data and information concerning the new TUMF.
B. On January 2, 2025, the City mailed a Notice of the Public Hearing to interested parties who had filed a written request with the City for mailed notice of the meeting on new or increased fees or service charges within the previous twelve (12) months.
C. The City Council duly considered data and information provided by the public and City Staff at the public hearing relative to the cost of the improvements and facilities for which the TUMF is proposed and all other comments, whether written or oral, submitted prior to the conclusion of the public hearing.
-12-
12774-0009\2103249v3.doc
SECTION 3. CEQA. The amendments to the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Program as described in this Ordi nance is not a “project” within the meaning of Section 15378(b)(4) of the CEQA Guidelines, and is therefore exempt from the requirements of CEQA.
Section 15378(b)(4) of the CEQA Guidelines states that a project does not include the creation of government funding mechanisms or other government fiscal activities which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment. The Ordinance does not approve the construction nor cause the construction of any specific transportation improvements within Riverside County. This Ordinance will have no effect on the environment. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(d) and 15062, a Notice of Exemption will be prepared, executed and fi led for the foregoing determination in the manner required by law, that this is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act and therefore, no environmental impact assessment is necessary.
SECTION 4. Effect of Ordinance. This Ordinance is intended to amend Chapter 3.70 and supersede any ordinance or resolution of the County of Riverside or the City of Jurupa Valley relating to the terms of this Ordinance, including, but not limited to, Riverside County Ordinance Nos. 824.7, 824.8, 824.9, 8 24.10, and 824.11, codified in Chapter 4.58 of the Riverside County Code of Ordinances and known as the “Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Program Ordinance of 2017,” and the Riverside County TUMF Resolutions, which were adopte d by reference by the City of Jurupa Valley as described in Section 3.70.010, Subparagraph B, and City of Jurupa Valley Ordinance No. 2014-09.
SECTION 5 SEVERABILITY. If any one or more of the terms, provisions or sections of this Ordinance shall to any e xtent be judged invalid, unenforceable and/or voidable for any reason whatsoever by a court of competent jurisdiction, then each and all of the remaining terms, provisions and sections of this Ordinance shall not be affected thereby and shall be valid and enforceable.
SECTION 6. JUDICIAL REVIEW. In accordance with State law, any judicial action or proceeding to attack, review, set aside, void or annul this Ordinance shall be commenced within the time limits set forth in Government Code Section 66022.
SECTION 7. CERTIFICATION. The Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same or a summary thereof to be published and posted in the manner required by law.
SECTION 8. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after passage.
-13-
12774-0009\2103249v3.doc
SECTION 9. CERTIFICATION. The City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published or posted in the manner required by law.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 6th day of February, 2025.
_____________________________
Brian Berkson
Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk
-14-
12774-0009\2103249v3.doc
CERTIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )
I, Victoria Wasko, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 2025-01 was regularly introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 16th day of January, 2025 and thereafter at a regular meeting held on the 6 th day of February, 2025, it was duly passed and adopted by the following vote of the City Council:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 6th day of February, 2025.
_______________________________
Victoria Wasko, City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley
B-1
12774-0009\2103249v3.doc
Exhibit “B”
Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Nexus Study: 2024 Update [Document is on file in the Office of the City Clerk]
-1-
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.C
ORDINANCE NO. 2025-02
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, ACTING IN ITS CAPACITY AS THE LEGISLATIVE
BODY OF CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2023-001 (SEQUANOTA HEIGHTS ) AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A
SPECIAL TAX THEREIN
RECITALS:
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley (the "City Council"), has previously adopted Resolution No. 2024-119 entitled "Resolution of Intention of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley, California to Establish City of Jurupa Valley Community Facilities District No. 2023-001 (Sequanota Heights) and to authorize the levy of a Special Tax within City of Jurupa Valley Community Facilities District No. 2023-001 (Sequanota Heig hts)" (the "Resolution of Intention"), stating its intention to conduct proceedings to form City of Jurupa Valley Community Facilities District No. 2023-001 (Sequanota Heights) (the "CFD") pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended, commencing with Section 53311 of the California Government Code (the "Act") to finance certain services (the "Services") including incidental expenses, to serve the CFD; and
WHEREAS, the Resolution of Intention set January 16, 2025, at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as practical, as the date of a public hearing on all matters pertaining to the formation of the CFD, the extent of the CFD, the furnishing of Services to serve the CFD, and the proposed Rate and Method of Apportionment of the special ta x within the CFD (the "Rate and Method"); and
WHEREAS, a notice of public hearing was published and mailed to all landowners proposed to be included in the CFD in accordance with the Act; and WHEREAS, at the public hearing, evidence was presented to the City Council on such matters before it, including a special report (the “Report”) describing the services necessary to adequately meet the needs of the CFD and the estimated costs of financing such Services as required by Section 53321.5 of the Act; and
WHEREAS, at the public hearing, all persons desiring to be heard on all matters pertaining to the formation of the CFD, the extent of the CFD, the furnishing of Services to serve the CFD, and the Rate and Method were heard and a full and fair hearing was held; and WHEREAS, subsequent to the public hearing, the City Council adopted a resolution entitled “Resolution of Formation of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, to Establish City of Jurupa Valley Community Facilities District No. 2023-001 (Sequanota Heights), to Establish an Appropriations Limit therefor, to Authorize the Submittal of the Levy of Special Taxes, and to Submit the Establishment of an Appropriations Limit, to the Qualified Electors of such Community Facilities District” (the “Resolution of Formation”) which established the CFD and authorized the levy of a special tax within the CFD; and
RETURN TO AGENDA
-2-
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.C
WHEREAS, subsequent to the public hearing, the City Council also adopted a resolution entitled "Resolution of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley Calling a Special Election and Submitting to the Qualified Electors of City of Jurupa Valley Community Facilities District No. 2023-001 (Sequanota Heights ) Propositions Regarding the Establishment of an Appropriations Limit and the A nnual Levy of a Special Tax Within the Community Facilities District" (the "Resolution Calling Election") which called a special election of the qualified electors within the CFD; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of the Resolution Calling Election, an election was held in which qualified electors of the CFD approved the establishment of an appropriations limit for the CFD and the levy of a special tax (the "Special Tax") within the CFD; and
WHEREAS, on January 16 , 2025, the City Council adopted a resolu tion entitled "Resolution of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley Declaring the Results of a Special Election in the City of Jurupa Valley Community Facilities District No. 2023-001 (Sequanota Heights) and Directing the Recording of a Notice of Special Tax Lien" (the "Resolution Declaring Results of Election") which certified the results of the January 16, 2025 election conducted by the City Clerk, which results showed that more than two -thirds of the votes cast in the CFD were in favor of the proposition to levy the Special Tax and the proposition to establish an appropriations limit for the CFD;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY:
1. Recitals Correct. The foregoing recitals are true and correct.
2. Authorization of the Levy of a Special Tax . By the passage of this Ordinance, the City Council authorizes the levy of the Special Tax in the CFD in accordance with the Rate and Method set forth in the Exhibit “B” to the Resolution of Formation, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and incorporated by reference herein.
3. Annual Rate Determination. The City Council is hereby further authorized to determine on or before August 10 each year, or such other date as is established by law or by the County Auditor-Controller of the County of Riverside, the specific Special Tax to be levied on each parcel of land in the CFD, except that special taxes to be levied shall not exceed the maximum rates set forth in the Rate and Method, but the special tax may be levied at a lower rate.
4. Exempt Property . Except as provided in Section 53340.1 of the Act and except for properties that a local agency is a landowner of within the meaning of subdivision (f) of Section 53317 of the Act, pursuant to Section 53340 of the Act, properties of entities of the state, federal and local governments shall be exempt from the levy of the Special Tax.
Reference is hereby made to the Rate and Method for a description of other properties or entities that are expressly exempted from the levy of the Special Tax.
5. Use of Collections. All of the collections of the Special Tax shall be used only as provided by the Act and in the Resolution of Formation. The Special Tax shall be levied only so -3-
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.C
long as needed for the purposes as described in the Resolution of Formation.
6. Collection. The Special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem taxes and shall be subject to the same penalties and the same procedure, sale and lien in any case of delinquency as applicable for ad valorem property taxes; provided, however, that the Special Tax may be collected by direct billing by the City of the property owners in the CFD or in such other manner as may be provided by the City Council. In addition, the provisions of Section 53356.1 of the Act shall apply to any delinquent Special Tax payments.
7. Authorization. The specific authorization for adoption of the Ordinance is Section 53340 of the Act.
8. Severability. If for any reason any portion of the Ordinance is found to be invalid, or if the Special Tax is found inapplicable for any particular parcel within the CFD, by a court of competent jurisdiction, the balance of this Ordinance, and the application of the Special Tax to the remaining parcels within the CFD shall not be affected.
9. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify the passage of this Ordinance and cause it to be published or posted in accordance with law.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 6th day of February, 2025.
Brian Berkson
Mayor
ATTEST:
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk
AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.C
CERTIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )
I, Victoria Wasko, City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 2025-02 was regularly introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 16th day of January, 2025 and thereafter at a regular meeting held on the 6th day of February, 2025, it was duly passed and adopted by the following vote of the City Council:
AYES: BARAJAS, BERKSON, CARMONA, SANCHEZ, SILVA
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 6th day of February, 2025.
Victoria Wasko, City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley
Page | 1
03/28/2024.04/17/202120
STAFF REPORT
DATE: FEBRUARY 6, 2025
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: SUSAN PARAGAS, FINANCE DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.D
CHECK REGISTERS
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council ratify the check registers dated January 2, 9, 16, and 23, 2025 as well as the payroll registers dated January 3 and 17, 2025.
The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley authorizes expenditures through the annual budget process. The FY 2024-25 Budget was adopted on June 6, 2024. Expenditures not included in the annual budget process are approved by resolution throughout the fiscal year.
ANALYSIS
All expenditures on the attached check registers have been approved by the City Council and are in conformance with the authority provided by Section 37208 of the Government Code.
OTHER INFORMATION
None.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
Check registers:
01/02/2025 $ 1,097,337.71
01/09/2025 $ 2,140,203.58
01/16/2025 $ 921,895.88
01/23/2025 $ 526,804.91
RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 1
STAFF REPORT
DATE: FEBRUARY 6, 2025
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: PAUL TOOR, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/ CITY ENGINEER
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.E
APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN DE ANZA COUNTRY
SHOPPING CENTER, LP AND THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY FOR
MAINTENANCE OF CITY PARKWAYS FOR THE K-MART SITE
REDEVELOPMENT MA 22087 PROJECT LOCATED AT THE
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LIMONITE AVENUE AND DE ANZA
PLAZA INTERSECTION
RECOMMENDATION
1. The City Council approve the agreement between De Anza Country Shopping Center, LP and the City of Jurupa Valley for maintenance of parkways; and
2. Authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement in substantially the form and format attached and as approved by the City Attorney; and
3. Accept Performance Bond No. LICX3003922 in the amount of $ 126,638.58 for parkway Improvements.
BACKGROUND
As a condition of approval for Master Application 22087 , the property owner, De Anza Country Shopping Center, LP , was required to annex the site into the existing City of Jurupa Valley Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District ( L&LMD) 89-1-C. This annexation would allow the City to assess the property owner for all costs associated with the maintenance of landscaping and public improvement s within the right-of-way and ensure compliance with the conditions set forth in the project entitlement.
RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2
ANALYSIS
Initially, the project was intended to be incorporated into a Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District (L&LMD), however, the approved landscape plans did not coincide with the LLMD outlines. It is cost prohibitive to change the landscape plans as it would require major street pavement cuts along Limonite Avenue.
Staff has negotiated a Landscape Maintenance Agreement (LMA) with the property owner to replace the L&LMD , relinquishing the maintenance responsibilities to the property owner. Under this agreement, the property owner will continue to maintain the parkway landscaping. In the event that the property owner fails to maintain the parkway landscaping, the City will have the authority to maintain the parkway landscape at the property owner’s expense as set forth in this agreement.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
Approval of this agreement will have no impact to the City General Fund.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Do not approve Agreement as recommended.
2. Provide alternate direction to staff.
**********************SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE**********************
Page | 1
120
STAFF REPORT
DATE: FEBRUARY 6, 2025
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: PAUL TOOR, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM 15.F
ACCEPTANCE OF THE OFFER OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY
EASEMENT DEDICATION FOR VAN BUREN MARKETPLACE ON
RUTILE STREET AND VAN BUREN BOULEVARD (CONTROL
MANAGEMENT, INC. ); ( APN 167 -330-006, 167 -330-010, 167 -330- 015, 167-110-039)
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council:
1. Accept the offer of dedication of an easement for public road and drainage purposes, including public utility and public services purposes, over the areas as shown on Exhibit B of DED23-004.
2. Authorize the Director of Public Works and City Clerk to sign the Acceptance of Dedication for DED23-004.
BACKGROUND
As part of the April 4, 2020 Planning Commission meeting, Control Management Inc. a California Corporation , applied for Conditional Use Permit No. 19003 and Site Development Permit No. 20010 (Master Application No. 19041 or MA No. 19041) to permit the phased construction of a 90,262 square -foot commercial center (“Van Buren Marketplace”), including multiple retail shops on approximately 15.9 acres of real property located at the southwest corner of Van Buren Boulevard and Rutile Street.
As part of the Van Buren Marketplace development approval, the owner is required to dedicate a portion of the property along Van Buren Boulevard for public road and drainage purposes.
RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2
The applicant submitted the required offer of dedication documents and staff reviewed the documents and find them in compliance with the California Government Code (7050), local ordinances, and the conditions of approval for this development.
ANALYSIS
In anticipation of acceptance of the offers of dedications, staff prepared a Certificate of Acceptance as required by Government Code Section 27281. Acceptance of the offers of dedication will grant the City an easement for public road and draina ge purposes and allow improvements along Rutile Street and Van Buren Boulevard.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no impact to the general fund.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Take no action.
2. Provide alternative direction to staff.
************************** SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE **************************
Page | 1
STAFF REPORT
DATE: FEBRUARY 6, 2025
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: PAUL TOOR, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/ CITY ENGINEER
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.G
APPROVAL OF TRACT MAP NO. 37857; LAS PALMAS LOCATED
NORTH OF 45 TH STREET BETWEEN OPAL STREET AND PACIFIC
AVENUE, ACCEPTANCE OF OFFERS OF DEDICATION, APPROVAL
OF SUBDIVISION AGREEMENTS, AND ACCEPTANCE OF
IMPROVEMENT BONDS
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council:
1. Approve Tract Map 37857 and accept the dedication as follows:
a. Accept the real property described as an easement for street , public utility and drainage purposes together with the right of ingress and egress for emergency vehicles within Lot “A” (Majesty Lane), Lot “B” (La Brisa Street), Lot “C” (Areca Lane), Lot “D” (El Granate Street), and Lots “E” through “L”.
b. Accept the dedication for Lot “37” for basin and water quality purposes.
2. Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign Tract Map 37857.
3. Approve and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Subdivision Agreements; and
4. Accept the surety bonds for construction of related improvements and survey monumentation.
RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2
BACKGROUND
On December 21, 2023, the Jurupa Valley City Council approved TTM No.37857 for Las Palmas. The tentative tract map includes a residential subdivision of 3.84 combined acres with 36 lots for single-family detached homes located on 45th Street between Pacific Avenue and Opal Street.
Staff has reviewed Tract Map 37857 and finds that it is in substantial conformance with the approved Tentative Map. The City Attorney has reviewed and approved to form the Subdivision Agreements. These actions approve the Tract Map, Subdivision Agreements, and accepts offers of dedication and the bonds related to the subdivision.
ANALYSIS
Pursuant to the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act and the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Title 7, Tract Maps require City Council action for approval, denial, or modifications.
Per the Subdivision Map Act Section 66474.1, a legislative body shall not deny approval of a Tract Map if it was previously approved a tentative tract map for the proposed subdivision and if it finds t hat the Tract Map is in substantial compliance with the previously approved tentative tract map. Staff recommends that the City Council approve Tract Map No. 37857 and accept the offers of dedication , the subdivision agreements, and bonds.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The City will receive development fees and payments as part of the obligations defined in the Municipal Code.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Do not approve Agreement as recommended.
2. Provide alternate direction to staff.
**********************SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE**********************
Page | 1
120
STAFF REPORT
DATE: FEBRUARY 6, 2025
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: VICTORIA WASKO, CMC, CITY CLERK
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.H
AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CERTAIN OBSOLETE CITY
RECORDS
RECOMMENDATION
1) That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2025-01, entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CERTAIN
OBSOLETE CITY RECORDS
BACKGROUND
At the January 16, 2025 meeting, the Council asked that this item be brought back for further clarificatio n regarding the retention of inactive email records from former City employees. At their January 18, 2018 meeting, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2018-01, adopting the City’s electronic mail policy. The policy references the retention and use of electronic mail as follows:
● E-mail may also constitute an “Official City Record.” Subject to the requirements of the California Public Records Act (CPRA) and other laws and regulations that apply to public agency information.
● The City’s e -mail system has not been set up to handle retention and disposition, therefore, the e-mail system should not be used for the electronic storage or maintenance of documentation, including, but not limited to, official City records. As a daily best practice, users should be managing and deleting unwanted or unneeded e -mails and filing official City records in accordance with the City’s Records Retention Policy.
RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2
● Electronically stored information including e-mail messages, attachments, and other data is discoverable and may be used as evidence in litigation. E -mail messages and other electronically stored information that is related to current, pending, and potential litigation must be retained and produced in a timely manner during discovery or the evidence-gathering phase of the litigation.
● In order to assure maximum efficiency in the operation of the e -mail system, staff is encouraged to delete e -mail messages that are not Official City Records from their in-boxes once they are no longer n eeded. If a hard copy of data, which constitutes an Official City Record, has been printed and filed in accordance with the City’s Record Retention Policy, the e -mail may be deleted.
Under the California Public Records Act, “‘public records’ includes any writing containing information relating to the conduct of the public’s business prepared, owned, used, or retained by any state or local agency regardless of physical form or characteristics.” City emails that relate to the conduct of the public’s busine ss are “public records” and must be retained for the periods required by state law and the City’s Records Retention Policy.
The attached Records Retention Policy outlines the procedures for destruction of public records in the form of emails that have me t their current retention period . The City Council may amend the current policy to maintain email records for a longer retention period at their discretion, keeping in mind that the City’s goal is to ensure that records are kept only as long as they have some administrative, fiscal, historic, or legal value to the City. K eeping records beyond their minimum retention creates increased expense for storage space and staff time.
The City’s records are an important asset of the City; however, over time various records lose their legal, fiscal, or administrative significance. The City Clerk’s office is recommending that the City Council approve the destruction of obsolete records that have reached the end of their retention and have no further legal, fiscal, or administrative value.
The proposed resolution complies with the City’s Records Management Policy, which was adopted by Resolution No. 2018 -06. The intent of this policy is to apply efficient and economical management methods to the creation, utili zation, maintenance, retention, preservation, and disposal of City records.
ANALYSIS
Following the adoption of a City resolution and approval by the City Attorney, City staff may destroy inactive records when they have satisfied all legal retention requirements.
Destruction is carried out in accordance with the City’s Record Retention Schedules and pursuant to Government Code Section 34090.
OTHER INFORMATION
An efficient record keeping system monitors all phases of a record and its lifespan.
Keeping records beyond their retention period creates a burden for staff, creates the
City of Jurupa Valley
IT Department
List of Records Scheduled for Destruction in CY 2025
Recorded Series File Number 100-04 General Correspondence GC 34090 Retention: Closed, plus 2 years
Email correspondence from the following employees or contractors/consultants who have left the organization at least two or more years ago:
Alfredo Machuco
Art Castro
Bob Hufnagle
Bob Makowski
Dave DeLeon
Deidra Mendoza
Eric Lomeli
James Foy
Jannette Mendoza
Joe Axtell
John Ciampa
John Kanlund
Keith Clarke
Langdon Teh
Leighton Muckey
Lindsey Nash
Patty Anders
Rocio Lopez
Ruben Villalpando
Record Series File Number 440-Land Use Control
County Files transferred to the City upon incorporation Retention: Permanent May image file after completion
Permanently Stored in Community Development Laserfiche Records Depository Application Number
CU01171 8791 MISSION BLVD
CU01171, CU1458-W MISSION BLVD; PEDLEY RD
CU01288 AGATE ST; PEDLEY RD
CU01350 6165 AVE JUAN DIAS
CU01922-SC W AGATE ST; N MISSION BLVD
CU02295-W RUBIDOUX BLVD
CU02422-W 5244 ETIWANDA AVE
CU02480 3770 OPAL ST
CU02498 5292 24TH ST
CU02498 BELL AVE; MARKET ST
CU02596 MISSION BLVD
CU02607-W HALL AVE; 26TH ST
CU02608 3750 ETIWANDA AV
CUP01374R1 BELLEGRAVE AVE; MARLATT & DODD ST
CUP01374REV 10396 BELLGRAVE AVE
CUP01918 N MISSION BLVD; E CRESTMORE RD
CUP02051S1 1500 RUBIDOUX BLVD
CUP02051S2 1500 RUBIDOUX BLVD; EL RIVINO RD; HALL AVE; AGUA MANSA RD CUP02644-W HALL AVE
CUP02750_1984 MISSION BLVD; GLEN AVON
CUP02793_1986 LA CANADA ST; PACIFIC ST; JOEL DR
CUP02801_1986 MISSION BLVD; OPAL ST
CUP02834_1987 JURUPA RD
CUP02855_1986 MISSION BLVD; ARORA
CUP02858_1986 CAMPBELL ST; BELLGRAVE
CUP02873_1986 50TH ST; BAIN ST; DODD ST; JURUPA RD
CUP02971_2007 MARKET ST; AGUA MANSA RD; RUBIDOUX BLVD
CUP02971_2007 MARKET ST; AGUA MANSA RD; RUBIDOUX BLVD
CUP02971_2007 _Building & Safety Comments MARKET ST; AGUA MANSA RD; RUBIDOUX BLVD CUP02971_2007 _COA MARKET ST; AGUA MANSA RD; RUBIDOUX BLVD CUP02971_2007 _COA County Water Resource MARKET ST; AGUA MANSA RD; RUBIDOUX BLVD CUP02971_2007 _COA Flood Control & Water Conservation DMARKET ST; AGUA MANSA RD; RUBIDOUX BLVD CUP02971_2007 _Comprehensive Project Review MARKET ST; AGUA MANSA RD; RUBIDOUX BLVD CUP02971_2007 _Conditions of Approval MARKET ST; AGUA MANSA RD; RUBIDOUX BLVD CUP02971_2007 _EIR Initial Study MARKET ST; AGUA MANSA RD; RUBIDOUX BLVD CUP02971_2007 _letter of Dept of Subs Control MARKET ST; AGUA MANSA RD; RUBIDOUX BLVD CUP02971_2007 _Letter RE: Sprinkler System MARKET ST; AGUA MANSA RD; RUBIDOUX BLVD CUP02971_2007 _Memo MARKET ST; AGUA MANSA RD; RUBIDOUX BLVD CUP02971_2007 _PHN Neg Dec MARKET ST; AGUA MANSA RD; RUBIDOUX BLVD CUP02971_2007 _Plan of Operation MARKET ST; AGUA MANSA RD; RUBIDOUX BLVD CUP02971_2007 COA CoRivCoWaste Management MARKET ST; AGUA MANSA RD; RUBIDOUX BLVD CUP02971_2007 NOPH 2-15-95 MARKET ST; AGUA MANSA RD; RUBIDOUX BLVD CUP02971_2007_Appeal MARKET ST; AGUA MANSA RD; RUBIDOUX BLVD CUP02971_2007_COA B&S MARKET ST; AGUA MANSA RD; RUBIDOUX BLVD CUP02971_2007_COA CARWQCB MARKET ST; AGUA MANSA RD; RUBIDOUX BLVD CUP02971_2007_COA Dept of Env Health MARKET ST; AGUA MANSA RD; RUBIDOUX BLVD CUP02971_2007_COA Engineering MARKET ST; AGUA MANSA RD; RUBIDOUX BLVD Address
CUP02971_2007_COA Fire Dept MARKET ST; AGUA MANSA RD; RUBIDOUX BLVD CUP02971_2007_COA Revised MARKET ST; AGUA MANSA RD; RUBIDOUX BLVD CUP02971_2007_COA Road Commissioner & County SurveyoMARKET ST; AGUA MANSA RD; RUBIDOUX BLVD CUP02971_2007_COA Transportation & Land Management AgMARKET ST; AGUA MANSA RD; RUBIDOUX BLVD CUP02971_2007_EA Form MARKET ST; AGUA MANSA RD; RUBIDOUX BLVD CUP02971_2007_Letter MARKET ST; AGUA MANSA RD; RUBIDOUX BLVD CUP02971_2007_Letter 1-15-92 MARKET ST; AGUA MANSA RD; RUBIDOUX BLVD CUP02971_2007_Letter CoRiv Transportation Dept MARKET ST; AGUA MANSA RD; RUBIDOUX BLVD CUP02971_2007_Letter Riverside Flood Control MARKET ST; AGUA MANSA RD; RUBIDOUX BLVD CUP02971_2007_Mitigated Neg Declaration MARKET ST; AGUA MANSA RD; RUBIDOUX BLVD CUP02971_2007_NOD_Receipts MARKET ST; AGUA MANSA RD; RUBIDOUX BLVD CUP02971_2007_PC Agenda 3-22-89 MARKET ST; AGUA MANSA RD; RUBIDOUX BLVD CUP02971_2007_PC SR_10-7-2007 MARKET ST; AGUA MANSA RD; RUBIDOUX BLVD CUP02971_2007_Plans MARKET ST; AGUA MANSA RD; RUBIDOUX BLVD CUP02971_2007_Plans I MARKET ST; AGUA MANSA RD; RUBIDOUX BLVD CUP02971_2007_Property Owners Cert Form MARKET ST; AGUA MANSA RD; RUBIDOUX BLVD CUP02971_PC Minutes MARKET ST; AGUA MANSA RD; RUBIDOUX BLVD CUP02977_1988 MISSION BLVD; PYRITE ST
CUP02989_1988 DODD ST; 60TH ST
CUP03013, SMP 170_1993 12000 PHILADELPHIA AVE
CUP03013, SMP 170_1993 12000 PHILADELPHIA AVE
CUP03027_1989 MISSION BLVD; LINDSAY ST
CUP03034_1982 8566 LIMONITE AVE
CUP03079_2003 GLEN AVON; FLEMING ST; HWY 60
CUP03154_1992 5291; 5339 PEDLEY RD; 54TH ST; FELSPAR ST CUP03162 1890 MARKET ST
CUP03190R1 6750 MISSION BLVD; JURUPA RD
CUP03251S1 RUBIDOUX BLVD; 30TH ST
CUP03254 HALL AVENUE; 28TH ST
CUP03260 7384 MISSION BLVD; FORMOSA ST
CUP03260RI S MISSION BLVD; E FORMOSA ST; W BYRNE RD
CUP03262 PYRITE ST; GRANITE HILL DR
CUP03262R1 3873 PYRITE ST
CUP03262R1 (2) 3873 PYRITE ST
CUP03264S2 37TH ST; VALLEY WY
CUP03288 2985 RUBIDOUX BLVD; 30TH ST
CUP03311 7790 LIMONITE AVE; EL PALOMINO
CUP03317 S GRANITE HILL DR; W PEDLEY RD; E ETIWANDA
CUP03328 3200 RUBIDOUX BLVD
CUP03343, CUP03453 9918; 9922 MISSION BLVD
CUP03354S1 5600 MISSION BLVD; RUBIDOUX BLVD
CUP03478 10789 JURUPA RD; 50TH; MARTIN ST; TROTH
CUP03508 BEN NEVIS BLVD; GRANITE HILL RD
CUP03518 5954 LIMONITE AVE; ETIWANDA AVE
CUP03526 LIMONITE AVE; BALDWIN AVE; CLAY ST
CUP03526_2008 LIMONITE AVE; BALDWIN AVE; CLAY ST
CUP03534 STONEWOOD LN; MISSION BLVD; PEDLY; PYRITE ST
CUP03534_2008 STONEWOOD LN; MISSION BLVD; VERNON AVE; PYRITE ST CUP03537_2010 MISSION BLVD; AVON ST; PEDLEY RD
CUP03542 6477 68TH ST; LIMONITE; 15 FWY; PATS RANCH RD
CUP03542_2007 LIMONITE AVE; I-15; PATS RANCH RD
CUP03555 LIMONITE AVE; 63RD ST
CUP03555_2007 63RD ST; LIMONITE AVE; WINEVILLE AVE; ETIWANDA AVE CUP03555_2009 LIMONITE AVE; 63RD ST; ETIWANDA AVE
CUP03564_2010 28TH ST; AVALON ST
CUP03567 5488 42ND ST; MISSION; TWINING; MENES
CUP03567_2008 5488 MISSION BLVD; TWINING ST; MENNES AVE CUP03582 2960 60 FWY; AVALON ST; RUBIDOUX BLVD; 28TH ST CUP03590_2008 LIMONITE AVE; CLAY ST
CUP03598 BAIN ST; VAN BUREN BLVD; SAN SEVAINE WY
CUP03598 SAN SEVAINE FLOOD CONTROL; SAN SEVAINE; BAIN ST CUP03598 (2) SAN SEVAINE WY; BAIN ST
CUP03628 3750 ETIWANDA AVE
CUP03628 (2) ETIWANDA AVE; VAN BUREN BLVD
CUP03649 8044 LIMONITE AVE
CZ06551 11375 BELLEGRAVE AVE
CZ06558 GRANITE HILL DR; PYRITE ST
CZ06562 MISSION BLVD; LA RUE ST
CZ06631, EA38431 JURUPA RD; LIMONITE AVE; CAMINO REAL
CZ07517 UNION AVE; VAN BUREN RD
CZ07533 63RD ST; LIMONITE AVE; WINEVILLE AVE; ETIWANDA AVE CZ07556 ARMSTRONG RD; NADEAU LN; LANDFAIR LN
CZ07600 AVALON ST; CANAL ST; ALTA MAR ST; KENWOOD PL
CZ07604 CANAL ST; MONTANA; ALTA MAR ST
CZ07605 GALENA ST; 45TH ST; AGATE ST; LEO ST
CZ07626 AVALON ST; CANAL ST; 60 FWY; ALTA MAR DR
CZ07654 LIMONITE AVE; 56TH ST; PEDLEY RD; CAMINO REAL
CZ07713 APN:165-070-005
CZ07730 MISSION BLVD; PONTIAC AVE; RUBIDOUX BLVD
CZ07758 TILTON AVE; MISSION BLVD; RIVERVIEW DR; BRIGGS ST CZ6488, EA37806 3851 PYRITE RD; GRANITE HILL DR
EIR00437 60 FWY; 15 FWY; ETIWANDA; BELLEGRAVE AVE
EIR00437 (2) 11400 60 FWY; 15 FWY; ETIWANDA AVE; BELLEGRAVE AVE EIR00462 BELLEGRAVE AVE; ETIWANDA AVE
GPA00750 JURUPA; MISSION; CAMINO REAL; TYROLITE
GPA00768 11276 63RD ST; LIMONITE AVE; WINEVILLE AVE; ETIWANDA GPA00844 MISSION BLVD; BELLEGRAVE AVE; AVON; AMARILLO
GPA00850 JURUPA RD; PYRITE ST; AGATE; TYROLITE
GPA00882 63RD ST; LIMONITE AVE; WINEVILLE AVE; ETIWANDA AVE GPA01095 MISSION BLVD; PONTIAC AVE; RUBIDOUX BLVD
GPA01095_CZ07730_GP MISSION BLVD; PONTIAC AVE; RUBIDOUX BLVD GPA01095_CZ07730_LU MISSION BLVD; PONTIAC AVE; RUBIDOUX BLVD GPA01095_CZ07730_PZ MISSION BLVD; PONTIAC AVE; RUBIDOUX BLVD GPA01095_CZ07730_VIC MISSION BLVD; PONTIAC AVE; RUBIDOUX BLVD LFD00155 JURUPA; BELLGRAVE; RIGEL; ETIWANDA
LLA03214 - LLA04390
LLA04433 - LLA05014
LLA05062 - LLA05407
LLA05284 JURUPA RD; 54TH ST; MARTIN AVE; TROTH ST
LLA05360 LIMONITE; GRAY MARE; BALDWIN AVE
LLA05363 GRANITE HILL; HUNTER; FLEMING
LLA05386 7940 JURUPA RD; 60 FWY; CAMINO REAL; PYRITE ST LLA05407 BELLEGRAVE; CANTU GALLEANO RANCH; WINEVILLE
M-3 89 6050; 5925 MISSION BLVD
PM18277 8304 LIMONTE AVE
PM23264 LIMONITE AVE; WINEVILLE AVE; LOREN RD
PM23448 GRANITE HILL RD
PM23855 58TH ST; MARLAT ST
PM24209 ALTA ST; MONTANA AVE
PM24710 MISSION BLVD; HWY 60; KATHY AVE
PM24798 54TH ST; PEDLEY RD
PM24822 60 FWY; ETIWANDA AVE
PM25555 VAN BUREN BLVD; ETIWANDA AVE
PM25634 ANZA RD
PM25730 28TH ST; RUBIDOUX BLVD
PM26079 VALDEZ AVE; THUNDER RIDGE RD
PM26185 WINTERS LN
PM26331 WINEVILLE RD; RIVERSIDE AVE
PM26365 APN: 156-061-001
PM26394 28TH ST; HALL ST
PM26654 WILSON ST; VIA RICARDO
PM26789 55TH ST; RUTILE ST
PM26840 54TH ST; VAN BUREN BLVD; 52ND ST; 53RD ST; FELSPAR ST PM26950 DANA AVE; 68TH ST; HOLMES AVE
PM27060 RIDGEVIEW AVE; ETIWANDA AVE; 54TH ST
PM27307 AVON ST; HASTINGS BLVD; BELLEGRAVE AVE
PM27380 50TH ST; MARLATT ST
PM27928 10542 60TH ST; MARLATT ST; TROTH ST
PM28031 AGATE ST; KIM LN; STONE AVE
PM28597
CANAL ST; LINDSEY ST; GRANITE HILL DR; PEDLEY RD; COUNTRY VILLAGE RD; CAMPBELL ST
PM29123 LIMONITE AVE; WINEVILLE AVE
PM29394 3401 ETIWANDA AVE; MISSION BLVD
PM29401 RIVERSIDE AVE; WINEVILLE RD
PM29565_2000 66TH ST; CHARLES AVE
PM29681_2000 PEDLEY RD; 58TH ST; FAGAN BLVD
PM29767_2003
PHILADELPHIA AVE; DULLES DR; RAIL LN; GRAPE VINE ST; UNION PACIFIC RD; PRIVATE DR; INLAND AVE
PM29891_2001 51ST ST; JURUPA RD; J ST
PM29913_2008 HARREL ST; CANTU-GALLEANO RANCH RD
PM29950_2009 STEVE ST; 60TH ST
PM31081_2008 9550 GALENA ST
PM31094 JURUPA ST; TROTH ST; MARLATT ST; 50TH ST
PM31094_2004 JURUPA RD; CASTRO LN; TROTH ST
PM31746_2005 GRAPEVINE ST; PHILADELPHIA AVE; DULLES DR
PM32106 OLIVIA WY; JURUPA RD; TYROLITE ST
PM32152_2007 VALDEZ AVE; SHARON WY; SKYVIEW RD
PM32404_2004 3351 GRAPEVINE ST
PM32405_2004 3575 GRAPEVINE ST
PM33016 5700 SERENDIPITY RD
PM33048 PHILADELPHIA AVE; GRAPEVINE ST
PM33328 TYROLITE ST; JURUPA RD
PM33466 5490 VIA RICARDO
PM33617 RUBIDOUX BLVD
PM34020 RUBIDOUX
PM34049 VENTURE DR
PM34178 GALENA ST; BELLEGRAVE AVE
PM34344 S GALENA ST; W BROOKHOLLOW CR
PM34409 64TH ST
PM34696 N MISSION BLVD; W AMARILLO ST; S BELLEGRAVE AVE PM34790 N 68TH ST; W LURETIA AVE
PM34826 N LANDON DR; W WINEVILLE RD; S CANTU-GALLEANO RANCH RD PM35273 MISSION BOULEVARD
PM35285 E MARKET ST; W VIA CERRO; N 24TH ST
PM35546 MISSION BLVD; TWINING ST; MENNES AVE
PM35587 CANTU GALLEANO RANCH RD; S HARREL ST; E DAY CREEK CHANNEL PM35587 11296 HARREL ST
PM35711 W AVALON ST; S 28TH ST
PM35711 (2) W AVALON ST; S 28TH ST
PM35712 CANAL ST
PM35726 E AGUA MANSA RD; S BROWN AVE
PM35884 STONEWOOD LN; MISSION BLVD; VERNON AVE; PYRITE ST PM35896 6046 PEDLEY RD
PM36183 S 56TH ST; E TOMAL LN; W VAN BUREN BLVD
PM36192 LIMONITE AVE; PEDLEY RD; CLAY ST
PP02266R1 4821 PEDLEY RD
PP02579 5310 MISSION BLVD
PP03179S1 5754 MISSION; RIVERVIEW
PP03858 7800 LIMONITE AVE
PP05947S2 5850 ETIWANDA AVE
PP06172S1 5771 MISSION BLVD
PP06728S1 MISSION BLVD; 46TH ST; LIMONITE AVE; MENNES ST PP06728S4 4130 MENNES AVE
PP07081S1 HASTINGS BLVD; AVON ST
PP07399 12160 PHILADELPHIA ST
PP07399S3 MISSION BLVD
PP07472S2 9965 CANAL ST
PP07472S2 CONNING; DELCEZ CHANNEL; PYRITE
PP07575 9790 JURUPA RD
PP07580 7351 MISSION BLVD
PP07911 5198 JURUPA; 50TH ST; ETIWANDA AVE; MARTIN
PP07990 3616 MAIN ST
PP08010 5880 20TH ST
PP08011R1 WACKER DR; N SAN SEVAINE WY
PP08061 19081 ROCKY RD
PP08061S1 6625 CLAY ST; VAN BUREN BLVD
PP08061S2 6625 CLAY ST; VAN BUREN
PP08071 1430 UNIVERSITY AVE
PP08071S1 7940 LIMONITE AVE
PP08075 9700 GALENA
PP08079 5694 MISSION BLVD
PP08387 3815 WABASH ST
PP08844 LIMONITE AVE; VAN BUREN BLVD
PP08916R1 2245 VIA CERRO
PP09035 9092 JURUPA RD
PP09065 9040 JURUPA RD
PP09078S1 6118 CLAY ST
PP09380 5950 SERENDIPITY; 60TH ST
PP09491 10820 SAN SEVAINE WAY
PP10147 1893 BROWN AVE; WILSON ST
PP10240 5230 WILSON ST; FLEETWOOD DR
PP10255 1700 CONTAINER CIR
PP10379 JURUPA RD; VAN BUREN BLVD
PP10531 8709 MISSION BLVD; PEDLEY RD
PP10667 2304 FLEETWOOD DR
PP10872R1_2007 RUSTIC LN; MISSION BLVD; OPAL ST; PACIFIC AVE PP10944 11093 VENTURE DR; INLAND AVE; ETIWANDA AVE
PP10946 11171 VENTURE DR
PP11036_1991 10240 SAN SEVAINE WY
PP11036R1 SAN SEVAINE WY; WABASH DR
PP11073, PP11073S1_1992 4085 BAIN ST
PP11078, PP023429-00_1990 4698 BROOKHOLLOW CIR; VAN BUREN BLVD PP11250_1990 2350 FLEETWOOD
PP11258R1_2011 JURUPA RD; GALENA; FELSPAR; GLEN
PP11258R1_2011 (2) JURUPA RD; GALENA ST; FELSPAR ST; PEDLEY RD PP11501_1991 BELLE GRAVE AVE; AMARILLO ST
PP11567_1990 6815 VALLEY WY
PP11810_1990 381 28TH ST; HALL AVE
PP11896S3_2010 6001 20TH ST
PP11899_1992 2350 HALL AVE; 24TH ST
PP12036_1991 6010 EL PALOMO DR; LIMONITE AVE
PP12136_1991 4261 CAMPBELL ST; BELGRAVE AVE
PP12153 28TH ST; HALL ST
PP12173 BEN NEVIS BLVD; AVON ST
PP12273 6293 PEDLEY RD
PP12274 6293 PEDLEY RD
PP12275 DE ANZA PLAZA DR
PP12406 BRIGGS ST
PP12447 N JURUPA RD & VAN BUREN S/GALENA ST W/FELSPAR ST PP12515 7097 MISSION BLVD
PP12532 5296 24TH ST
PP12550 N/60 FWY S/PHILADELPHIA ST E/15 FWY W/ETIWANDA
PP12550, PP13283 PHILADELPHIA ST
PP12550S1_2011 PHILADELPHIA ST; 15 FWY; ETIWANDA AVE; 60 FWY PP12602 11888 MISSION BLVD
PP12692 11375 RIVERSIDE AVE
PP12730 3590 DE FOREST CIR
PP12733 8720 VAN BUREN BLVD
PP12791 5456 MISSION BLVD
PP12810_1993 ETIWANDA AVE
PP12823 9957 60TH ST
PP12871 3590 DE FOREST CIR
PP12887 6010 PALOMINO AVE
PP12889 S 60 FWY/ W ETIWANDA AVE ON HARRELL ST
PP12913 6459 MISSION BLVD
PP12930 3147 PROGRESS CIR
PP12998 10810 SAN SEVAINE
PP13020 JURUPA RD; VAN BUREN BLVD
PP13024 4775 BROOKHOLLOW CIR
PP13066 6240 MISSION BLVD
PP13067 5786 MISSION BLVD
PP13072 5786 MISSION BLVD
PP13074 28TH ST; RUBIDOUX BLVD
PP13105 5760 MISSION BLVD
PP13123 9415 MISSION BLVD
PP13136 7840 LIMONITE AVE
PP13186 BAKER ST; KENNEDY ST
PP13192 9643 MISSION BLVD
PP13220 6072 ETIWANDA AVE
PP13233 7097 MISSION BLVD; 60 FWY; SOTO AVE; VALLEY WY
PP13245 E/S/O DULLES DR
PP13256 4775 BROOKHOLLOW CIR
PP13260 10112 MISSION BLVD
PP13271 5760 MISSION BLVD
PP13296 8550 LIMONITE AVE
PP13297 CLAY ST; DE ANZA PLAZA DR
PP13298 MISSION BLVD; VALLEY WAY; RUBIDOUX
PP13301 9240 LIMONITE AVE
PP13308 PYRITE ST; MISSION BLVD
PP13312 VAN BUREN BLVD; BELLGRAVE AVE
PP13314_1992 10535 48TH ST
PP13323_1992 6459 MISSION BLVD
PP13326_1992 INLAND AVE; PROGRESS CIR
PP13350_1996 6400 CLAY ST
PP13351_1993 12180 MISSION BLVD
PP13358_1996 4698 BROOKHOLLOW CIR
PP13366_1992 9961 MISSION BLVD
PP13403_1992 GREEN CREST CT; LAKESIDE DR
PP13426_1992 11888 MISSION BLVD
PP13427_1992 9270 JURUPA RD
PP13430_1994 5327 MISSION BLVD
PP13432_1992 3678 VAN BUREN BLVD
PP13435_1993 6830 VALLEY WY
PP13437_1992 3090 PULLMAN ST
PP13468_1993 10980 INLAND AVE
PP13476_1993 3090 PULLMAN ST
PP13477, TR23515_1993 3090 PULLMAN ST; EL PALOMINO DR
PP13490, PP13297_1993 DE ANZA PLACE DR; CLAY ST
PP13491_1993 AGUA MANSA RD
PP13500_1993 3090 PULLMAN ST
PP13522_1993 4775 BROOKHOLLOW CIR
PP13550_1993 MENNES AVE
PP13551_1993 BALLAARATT CT
PP13558_1993 4620 GALENA ST
PP13581 6830 VALLEY WY
PP13593 6130 CAMINO REAL
PP13596 4468 PARKHURST ST
PP13629 2518 HALL AVE
PP13631 9957 60TH ST
PP13636 10888 SAN SEVAINE WAY
PP13654 9957 60TH ST
PP13666 N DE FOREST DR AND E ETIWANDA AVE
PP13670 S LIMONITE AVE E OF CAMINO REAL W EL PALOMINO DR PP13676 9410 W MISSION BLVD
PP13682 N STOBBS WAY S/MISSION BL E/OPAL ST W/STOBBS WAY PP13683 5476 ASH ST
PP13719 6328 MISSION BLVD
PP13720 6250 CLAY ST
PP13735 8293 MISSION BLVD
PP13747 9400 GALENA ST
PP13774 NW 28TH ST AND RUBIDOUX BLVD
PP13775 9244 GALENA ST
PP13823 9980 MISSION BLVD
PP13827 11300 INLAND AVE
PP13833 5850 ETIWANDA AVE
PP13840 9918 MISSION BLVD
PP13862 6310 MISSION
PP13881 3710 ETIWANDA AVE
PP13910 MISSION BLVD
PP13912 N/GALENA ST S/VAN BUREN E/BELLGRAVE W/UNION ST
PP14253 5730 MISSION BLVD
PP14265 3980 OPAL ST
PP14281 7990 LIMONITE AVE
PP14289 7800 LIMONITE AVE
PP14300 AGATE RD; JURUPA RD
PP14320 6835 VALLEY WY; MISSION BLVD
PP14326 2518 HALL AVE
PP14330 N/RIVERSIDE S/JURUPA ST E/WINEVILLE ST W/ETTIWANDA PP14357 8781 LAKEVIEW AVE
PP14362 3838; 3840 PONTIAC AVE
PP14363 N/BELLGRAVE AVE S/HARREL ST E/ETIWANDA AVE W/WINEVILLE RD PP14388 2344 FLEETWOOD DR
PP14393 9957 60TH ST
PP14403 APN: 156-140-054
PP14404 5880 20TH ST
PP14404 MARKET ST; RUBIDOUX BLVD
PP14412 4383 SAN TROPEZ DR
PP14413 APN: 156-350-032
PP14423 9957 60TH ST
PP14440 HAVEN DR; CLAY ST
PP14446 6060 CAMINO REAL
PP14451 4640 GALENA ST
PP14456 9935 MISSION BLVD
PP14470-L 156-080-032
PP14480 12100 RIVERSIDE DR
PP14486 3285 DE FOREST CIR
PP14495 9372 MISSION BLVD
PP14506 12180 MISSION BLVD
PP14518 APN: 156-350-054
PP14528 4501 ETIWANDA AVE
PP14535S7 4345 PARKHURST ST
PP14555 E/MONTANA AVE AND S/25TH ST
PP14559 1389 W CENTER ST
PP14575 MISSION BLVD; VALLEY WY
PP14586, CUP03178 6120 20TH ST
PP14589-L, CUP03190 MISSION BLVD; JURUPA RD
PP14597 S/GALENA ST W/BROOKHOLLOW CIRCLE
PP14613 3980 OPAL ST
PP14616 N HOLMES S/LIMONITE E/ETIWANDA W/MANN AVE
PP14620-5 163-042-066
PP14630 7940 MISSION BLVD
PP14634 5771 MISSION BLVD
PP14639 14970 CHANDLER ST
PP14641 7621 GRANITE HILL DR
PP14664 2790 RUBIDOUX BLVD
PP14665 6250 CLAY ST
PP14673 12180 MISSION BLVD
PP14677 5771 MISSION BLVD
PP14703 2518 HALL AVE
PP14708 N/AGUA MANSA S/BROWN AVE E/BROWN AVE
PP14726 5477 30TH ST; 60 FWY; HALL AVE
PP14738 12085 LIMONITE AVE
PP14757 11350 RIVERSIDE DR
PP14762 ETIWANDA AVE; HARREL ST
PP14765-S 5691 MISSION AVE
PP14766 AGUA MANSA RD; WILSON ST; BROWN AVE
PP14770S 5691 MISSION AVE
PP14792 10484 JURUPA RD
PP14796 8976 LIMONITE AVE
PP14805 9935 MISSION BLVD
PP14818 8980 LIMONITE AVE
PP14819 N/60 FWY S/PHILADELPHIA ST E/15 FWY W/ETIWANDA
PP14823R3 ETIWANDA AVE; RIVERSIDE DR
PP14863-5 11020 LIMONITE AVE
PP14878 ORCO PARKWAY NW/ FELSPAR AND GALENA ST
PP14883 APN: 163-280-063
PP14890 2591 RUBIDOUX BLVD
PP14897 9001 MISSION BLVD
PP14899 4468 PARKHURST ST
PP14907 SWC ETIWANDA AND RIVERSIDE DR
PP14911 5691 MISSION BLVD
PP14912 9935 MISSION BLVD
PP14913 5473; 5474; 5475; 54 MISSION BLVD
PP14915 S/INLAND AVE E/VENTURE DR
PP14929 8816 LIMONITE AVE
PP14931 5543 MISSION BLVD
PP14936 4453 PARKHURST ST
PP14951 3980 OPAL ST
PP14967 3058 DULLES DR
PP14985 PHILADELPHIA ST
PP14989 10900 SAN SEVANE WY
PP14995 S/INLAND AVE E/VENTURE DR
PP14995 INLAND AVE
PP14997 APN: 175-180-010
PP15004 5539 MISSION BLVD
PP15007 APN: 163-032-027
PP15011 INLAND AVE; PROGRESS CIR
PP15014 11215 RIVERSIDE DR
PP15034 PHILADELPHIA ST; DULLES AVE
PP15035 8990 MISSION BLVD
PP15042 4020 ETIWANDA AVE
PP15042 3452 UNIVERSITY AVE
PP15043 S GALENA ST; E BROOKHOLLOW CR
PP15049 380 W FOOTHILL BLVD
PP15054 PHILADELPHIA ST
PP15060 6448 CANAL ST
PP15071 2100 AVALON; ST
PP15073 8550 LIMONITE AVE
PP15076 7840 LIMONITE AVE
PP15095 11455 GALENA ST
PP15120 SAN SEVAINE WY
PP15128 HARREL ST; ETIWANDA AVE; MIRA LOMA
PP15133 3885 WABASH AVE
PP15139 11020 ETIWANDA; LIMONITE
PP15152 DE FOREST CIR
PP15153 WILSON ST; BROWN AVE
PP15154 CONTAINER CIR; W RIVERSIDE CANAL
PP15184_1997 4345 PARKHURST ST
PP15186_1997 MISSION BLVD; DRIVE WY
PP15225_1997 11350 RIVERSIDE DR
PP15232_2006 8951 GRANITE HILL DR
PP15240_1997 6567 MISSION BLVD
PP15245_1998 CHANDLER LN; LINARES AVE; BRIAN CIR
PP15248_1998
JURUPA RD; TYROLITE ST; DESPERADO RD; STONE MIST CIR;
MEADOWLAND DR; MIRAMAR CIR; STONE AVE
PP15269_2000 11158 VENTURE DR; INALDN AVE
PP15271_2000 11098 INLAND AVE
PP15272_1998 ETIWANDA AVE; PHILADELPHIA ST
PP15273_2001 11175 INLAND AVE
PP15274_1999 PHILADELPHIA ST
PP15276_2007 3265 PROGRESS CIR
PP15282_1998 MONTANA AVE; 25TH ST
PP15284_1998 8677 LIMONTE AVE
PP15285_1998 INLAND AVE
PP15287_1998 MISSION BLVD; LA BONITA AVE
PP15291_1998 7790 LIMONITE AVE
PP15334_1998 5396 MISSION BLVD
PP15361_1998 3847 WABASH DR
PP15362 APN: 167-110-008
PP15375 8920 LIMONITE AVE
PP15381 6830 VALLEY BLVD
PP15401 SAN SEVAINE WY
PP15418 5771 MISSION BLVD
PP15435 5237 WANATCHEE WY
PP15436 181-341-010
PP15441 GALENA ST
PP15446 5804 MISSION BLVD
PP15447 10255 MISSION BLVD
PP15448 9661 MISSION BLVD
PP15463 6070 MISSION BLVD
PP15478 167-160-028
PP15483 11010 HOPKINS AVE
PP15486 LIMONITE AVE; EL PALOMINO DR
PP15502 9625 BELLEGRAVE AVE
PP15516 9215 ORCO PKWY
PP15517 9595 MISSION BLVD
PP15520 11201 IBERIA ST
PP15523 2693 RUBIDOUX BLVD
PP15528 8720 VAN BUREN BLVD
PP15541 WINEVILLE AVE
PP15546 9790 JURUPA RD
PP15547 6006 MISSION BLVD
PP15551 3782 RIVERVIEW DR
PP15552 6301 BALDWIN AVE
PP15562 PHILADELPHIA ST
PP15576 HALL ST; MARKET ST
PP15579 156-310-050
PP15579 11098 INLAND AVE
PP15580 11150 INLAND AVE
PP15581 11072 PHILADELPHIA ST
PP15582 11076 VENTURE DR
PP15584 VENTURE DR; INLAND AVE
PP15585 11058 PHILADELPHIA ST; ETIWANDA AVE
PP15586 11095 INLAND AVE
PP15587 11175 VENTURE DR; INLAND AVE
PP15597 10597 JURUPA RD
PP15598 914 WESTWOOD BLVD
PP15611 7384 MISSION BLVD
PP15618 10830 SAN SEVAINE WY
PP15619 GRANITE HILL DR; PYRITES ST
PP15625 10622 BELLEGRAVE AVE
PP15626 8190 MISSION BLVD
PP15642 10151 BEN NEVIS; MISSION
PP15642S1 10151 BEN NEVIS; MISSION BLVD; 60 FWY
PP15643 7155 38TH ST
PP15645 42 WINEVILLE RD
PP15646, BNR020262, EA38385 9846 LIMONITE AVE
PP15701, EA37497 7151 SIERRA AVE
PP15725_1998 MISSION BLVD
PP15729_1999 68TH ST
PP15730, BNR000048_2003 9267 JURUPA RD
PP15739_2002 CLAY ST; LAKESIDE DR; LIMONITE AVE
PP15750_1998 11010 LIMONITE AVE
PP15751_1998 7710 LIMONITE AVE
PP15761_1998 1999 THOMAS GUIDE
PP15776_1999 156-020-022
PP15779, BNR990006_1999 GALENA ST; MADALENA; ETIWANDA
PP15783_1998 5696 MISSION BLVD
PP15787_1999 3384 DE FOREST CIR
PP15788_1998 MARGIE WY; BROOKNOLL AVE
PP15791_1999 7990 LIMONITE AVE; VAN BUREN; ROCHELLE CT; JENNIFER PP15795_1999 LIMONITE AVE
PP15795S1 - 12085_2012 12085 LIMONITE AVE
PP15809_1999 MISSION BLVD
PP15834_2000 3650 DULLES DR
PP15841_1999 RIVERSIDE DR; ETIWANDA AVE
PP15851_1999 MARKET ST; 24TH ST
PP15852_1999
MISSION ROCK WY; CHITTENDEN CIR; SIERRA CROSS WY;
ARMISTICE WY; CONTAY WY; OLDENBURG ST; RUIS CT;
WESTERFIELD ST; OSAGE AVE
PP15880_2003 BROWN AVE; AGUA MANSA RD
PP15883_1999 3725 NOBEL CT
PP15898_1999 10810 LIMONITE AVE
PP15899_1999 THURSTON LN
PP15900_1999 68TH ST
PP15904_2010 11215 RIVERSIDE DR
PP15910_1999 9957 60TH ST
PP15911_1999 6280 CLAY ST
PP15922_1999 4752 FELSPAR ST
PP15926_1999 4247 CAMPBELL ST
PP15940S1 - 5477A_2012 5476 30TH ST
PP16030S7_2010 HASTING BLVD; RIVERSIDE DR; I-15; WINEVILLE PP16881 8992 JURUPA RD
PP16882 28TH ST; HALL AVE
PP16886 11076 VENTURE DR
PP16916 7790 LIMONITE AVE
PP16935 169-170-019
PP16937 BELLEGRAVE; CANTU-GALLEANO; 15 FWY; WINEVILLE RD PP16937-1 BELLEGRAVE; CANTU-GALLEANO; 15 FWY; WINEVILLE RD PP16937 VOL 1 BELLEGRAVE; CANTU-GALLEANO; 15 FWY; WINEVILLE RD PP16937 VOL 2 BELLEGRAVE; CANTU-GALLEANO; 15 FWY; WINEVILLE RD PP16937 VOL 3 BELLEGRAVE; CANTU-GALLEANO; 15 FWY; WINEVILLE RD PP16954 BELLEGRAVE; CANTU-GALLEANO; 15 FWY; WINEVILLE RD PP16956 RUBIDOUX BLVD
PP16968 10240 SAN SEVAINE WY
PP16974 MARKET ST; HALL AVE
PP16985 PACIFIC AVE
PP16998 9245 JURUPA RD
PP17030 5305 PEDLEY RD
PP17033 7840 LIMONITE AVE
PP17058 7621 GRANITE HILL DR
PP17061
PEDLEY RD; RIDGERIDER CT; FRIESIAN LN; MORGAN TRAIL LN;
SHETLAND LN
PP17064 7701 MISSION BLVD
PP17065
PEDLEY RD; FRIESIAN LN; RIDGERIDER CT; MORGAN TRAIL LN;
SHETLAND LN
PP17097 30TH ST; HELLER DR; DONNER WY
PP17100 7194 MISSION BLVD
PP17122 ETIWANDA AVE; IBERIA ST; SPACE CENTER CT; HOPKINS ST PP17141 7840 LIMONITE AVE
PP17143 8584 LIMONITE AVE
PP17146 MARKET ST; HALL AVE; 24TH ST; RUBIDOUX BLVD
PP17159 4821 PEDLEY RD
PP17178
PP17191 JURUPA RD
PP17213 6670 MISSION BLVD
PP17229 7840 LIMONITE AVE
PP17244 3725 NOBEL CT
PP17245 8914 LIMONITE AVE
PP17264 CRESTMORE RD; LORING RANCH RD
PP17274 5714 MISSION BLVD
PP17275 8918 LIMONITE AVE
PP17281_2002 TEMESCAL CANYON RD
PP17299_2001 APN: 181-344-005
PP17321_2001 6250 CLAY ST
PP17336_2003 4080 LEMON ST
PP17346_2001 8022 LIMONITE AVE; EL PALOMINO DR
PP17385_2001 7371 JURUPA RD
PP17415_2001 11098 INLAND AVE
PP17424_2001 10171 MISSION BLVD; SAN SEVAINE WY; STATE HWY 60 PP17429_2001 9961 MISSION BLVD
PP17430_2003 8606 63RD ST
PP17434_2002 4131 ETIWANDA AVE
PP17459_2001 11010 LIMONITE AVE
PP17460_2002 MISSION BLVD; JURUPA RD; CAMINO REAL
PP17463_2001 21760 CARSO ALTO DR
PP17466_2001 7710 LIMONITE AVE
PP17468_2001 CASTILLO DR; JAYHAWK DR; CAMINO SEDA
PP17469_2002 WENATCHEE WY; SUFFOLK ST
PP17470_2002
LORING RANCH RD; CRESTMORE RD; SUFFOLK ST; WENATCHEE
WY; EXMOOR CT; TIRESAN WY; HALFINGER WY; PALAMINA CIR;
KONIC CT; HOLSTEN ST
PP18260 9670 GALENA ST
PP18285 5140 ETIWANDA AVE
PP18298 8304 LIMONITE AVE
PP18299 8300 LIMONITE AVE
PP18309 WILSON ST; AGUA MANSA RD; BROWN AVE
PP18309R1 BROWN AVE
PP18325
MANCHESTER LN; WILLOWBROOK RD; FOXBOROUGH ST;
BERKSHIRE DR; WOODBRIDGE LN; NOTTINGHAM CT; BEDFORD
CT
PP18328 5850 ETIWANDA AVE
PP18352 PHILADELPHIA ST; DULLES DR; CHARDONEY WY
PP18403 11012 IBERIA ST
PP18419 DE FOREST CIR
PP18424
GALENA ST; MILLBROOK LN; WOODBRIDGE LN; CASTLEROCK
RD; BERKSHIRE DR; ROCKINGHAM LP; KINGS CT; PRINCE CT;
OXFORD CIR; FOXBOROUGH CT; STEVE AVE
PP18430 8860 LIMONITE AVE
PP18434 2910 RUBIDOUX BLVD
PP19379 4250 GALENA ST; VAN BUREN BLVD; ETIWANDA AVE
PP19391 56TH ST; PEDLEY RD; LIMONITE AVE
PP19400 7790 LIMONITE AVE
PP19405 3735 GRANITE HILL DR; VALLEY WY
PP19505 MISSION; PACKARD; MINTERN; ALLEY
PP19542 10255 CONNING; MISSION BLVD; BEN NEVIS
PP19543 6190 LIMONITE; 58TH ST; ETIWANDA AVE; RIDGEVIEW PP19544 6241 RIVERVIEW; KERN; JURUPA HILLS GOLF; SANDOVAL AVE PP19620 6824 MISSION BLVD; VALLEY WY
PP19649 42ND ST; MISSION BLVD; RUBIDOUX; PACIFIC
PP19681 5875 MISSION BLVD
PP19738 20TH ST; RUBIDOUX BLVD
PP19766 56TH ST; 54TH ST; PEDLEY; INDIAN HILLS GOLF COURSE PP19771 7031 MEARS AVE; 36TH ST; SCENIC DR; 34TH ST
PP19793 8022 VAN BUREN BLVD; LIMONITE AVE; CLAY ST; EL PALOMINO DR PP19833 1134 AGUA MANSA RD; HALL AVE; RUBIDOUX; BROWN AVE PP19846 INLAND; ETIWANDA AVE
PP19855 6328 STOBBS WY; MISSION BLVD; OPAL ST
PP19857 MAVERICK LN; AVE DE PALMA; AVE JUAN BAUTISTA; COVELLO PP19889 AVALON ST; 26TH ST; RUBIDOUX BLVD
PP19904 60 FWY; GRANITE HILL RD; PEDLEY RD
PP19906 5599 MISSION BLVD; RUBIDOUX
PP20037 11145 HOPKINS ST; PHILADELPHIA ST; VENTURE DR; PROGRESS CIR PP20043 3590 60 FWY; ETIWANDA AVE; PHILADELPHIA
PP20091 6830 VALLEY WY; MISSION BLVD
PP20122 3227 INLAND AVE; PROGRESS CIR
PP20145 MISSION BLVD; 42ND ST; LA RUE ST; RUBIDOUX BLVD PP20149 9846 LIMONITE AVE
PP20152 11650 MISSION BLVD; VENTURE DR; UNIVERSE DR; SPACE CENTER CT PP20197 60 FWY; ETIWANDA AVE
PP20204 4909 GALENA; VAN BUREN BLVD; FELSPAR ST; JURUPA RD PP20233 9802 BELGRAVE AVE; MISSION BLVD; LINDSAY ST; CONNING ST PP20284 6038 DORIS; MISSION BLVD; PACIFIC AVE; RIVERSIDE DR PP20397 3575 PHILADELPHIA ST; DULLES DR; COUNTRY VILLAGE RD PP20412 3710 IBERIA; ETIWANDA; URBANA
PP20419 1750 WILSON ST; AQUA MANSA RD; BROWN AVE
PP20453 27762 30TH ST; KORI CT; HELLER DR; DONNER WY
PP20508 JURUPA RD; BELLGRAVE AVE; BAIN; RUTLE
PP20520 HALL AVE; BROWN AVE; AGUA MANSA
PP20520S3 AGUA MENSA RD; BROWN AVE; HALL
PP20582 1725 AGUA MANSA RD
PP20588 3777 60 FWY; DE FOREST CIR
PP20588 3777 DE FOREST CIR
PP20669 3628 RUBIDOUX BLVD
PP20675 11555 MISSION BLVD; IBERIA ST; MISSION BLVD; ETIWANDA AVE PP20953 4955 FELSPAR ST
PP21014_2005 GALENA ST; THURSTON LN; DAY CREEK CHANNEL; ETIWANDA AVE PP21040_2005 GALENA ST; BROOKHOLLOW CIR
PP21083_2005 LAKESIDE DR; CLUBHOUSE DR
PP21130_2005 BELLE GRAVE AVE; LINDSAY ST
PP21136, EA40475_2005 VAN BUREN BLVD; 63RD AVE; PEGGY WY; PEDLEY RD PP21140_2011 510 MAIN ST
PP21255_2005 VIA RICARDO; WILSON ST; FLEETWOOD DR; VIA CERRO PP21359_2006 5490 VIA RICARDO; 68TH ST; LIMONITE AVE
PP21360_2006 48TH ST; BELLGRAVE AVE; TROTH ST; DODD
PP21435 11555 60 FWY; IBERIA ST; ETIWANDA; 15 FWY
PP21449 6038 DORIS; MISSION BLVD; PACIFIC; RIVERVIEW DR PP21472S1 4545 VAN BUREN; BELLGRAVE; RUTILE ST
PP21487 9245 JURUPA RD; 60 FWY; ETIWANDA; VAN BUREN
PP21490 10616 54TH ST; JURUPA BLVD; MARTIN ST; TROTH ST PP21490 N/54TH ST S/JURUPA RD E/MARTIN ST W/TROTH ST
PP21518 6000 LIMONITE; 60 FWY; VAN BUREN BLVD; MISSION BLVD PP21618 IBERIA ST
PP21660 10051 SANTA ANA RIVER; LIMONITE AVE; BAIN ST; BEACH ST PP21691 5961 LIMONITE AVE; VISTA DE ORO; PACIFIC AVE
PP21810 LIMONITE AVE
PP21917 SAN SEVAINE WY; WACKER DR
PP22025 3628 MISSION BLVD; 36TH ST; RUBIDOUX BLVD
PP22203 7621 60 FWY; JURUPA CULTURAL CNTR
PP22207 10596 JURUPA RD; LIMONTE; VAN BUREN; TROTH
PP22233 GOLF ST; KACHINA DR
PP22329 8330 CLAUDETTE; YEARLING WY; CLAY ST; BALDWIN AVE PP22393 LORING RANCH RD; LIMONITE AVE; CRESTMORE RD; MANHART CIR PP22442 4810 JURUPA RD; GALENA ST; PEDLEY RD; HORSESHOE LN PP22443 WEBB ST; DERBY DR; NEWCASTLE ST; POINSETTIA PL
PP22557 4545 RUTILE ST
PP22756 JURUPA AVE; MISSION BLVD; TYROLITE; CAMINO REAL PP22820 2964 60 FWY; 28TH ST; RUBIDOUX BLVD
PP22861 CLAY ST; VAN BUREN BLVD; JURUPA; CENTRAL
PP22991 9475 BELLEGRAVE AVE; CAMPBELL ST; MISSION BLVD
PP23212 6645 MISSION BLVD
PP23237 4909 FELSPAR ST
PP23742 11490 LIMONITE; BELLEGRAVE; WINEVILLE; ETIWANDA PP23756 60 FWY; SIERRA AVE; ARMSTRONG RD
PP23756S2 29TH ST; SIERRA AVE; SCENIC; ARMSTRONG
PP23756S3 6842 SIERRA AVE
PP23795 WENDOVER DR; LIMONITE AVE; CLAY ST; EL PALOMINO DR PP24372_2009 34TH ST; SCENIC; VALLEY WY; FWY 60
PP24668 10255 48TH ST; BELLE GRAVE AVE; DODD ST; BAIN ST PP24678 5666 58TH ST; MECHANICS WY; ETIWANDA AVE; RIDGEVIEW AVE PP24792 10253 60TH ST; 58TH ST; DODD ST; BAIN ST
PP24829_2011 GALENA ST; 44TH ST; FELSPAR; AVON
PP24919 11581 RANGE VIEW RD; AURORA AVE
PP24919_2011 DEL SUR; NIAGARA; ESCALA; AURORA
PP3858S2 7800 LIMONITE AVE; CAMINO REAL AVE; VAN BUREN BLVD PP4429S2 8875 LIMONITE AVE; VAN BUREN BLVD; COLLINS ST; HOLLADAY ST TP11700_1990 5015 CANYON CREST DR
TP12125_1990 8607 MISSION BLVD; AGATE ST
TPM36259 HOLMES AVE; CHARLES AVE; LORENA AVE
TR20250R1 KACHINA DR; PUTTERS CIR
TR31301 TYROLITE ST; JURUPA RD
TR31644 N/BELLGRAVE AVE W/ETIWANDA AVE
TR31644 (2) N/BELLGRAVE AVE W/ETIWANDA AVE
TR31958 LIMONITE AVE; RED MOUNTAIN RD; LONGS PEAK DR; CAMINO REAL TR32362 VAN BUREN BLVD
TR32545, PP19631_2005 68TH ST; LIMONITE AVE; I-15 FWY; PATS RANCH RD TR33258 64TH ST; LIMONITE AVE; WINEVILLE AVE; ETIWANDA AVE TR33461 APN: 160-060-041
TT31768, TT31778 N/O BELLEGRAVE S/O CANTU GALLEANO RANCH E/O WINEVILLE TT32946, CZO07085 6401 PERALTA PL
TTM31661 180-220-071; 183-240-077; 183-230-007
VAR01740 BELLEGRAVE AVE; GALENA ST; ETIWANDA AVE
VAR01749 11681 LIMONTE AVE; BELLEGRAVE AVE; WINEVILLE AVE; ETIWAND VAR01752 AVLIS LN; JURUPA AVE; TEASDALE AVE; KIRBY DR
VAR01753 ALTAMAR DR; JURUPA AVE; TYROLITE ST
VAR01769 44TH ST; BELLEGRAVE AVE; NORTHCROFT; ROYAL PINE VAR01783 63RD ST; LIMONITE AVE; DOWNEY; COREY
VAR01787 63RD AVE; LIMONITE AVE; WINEVILLE AVE; ETIWANDA AVE VAR01794 34TH ST; SIERRA AVE; NOVAK ST; ARMSTRONG RD
VAR01801 37TH ST; ODELL ST; WALLACE ST; DALY ST
VAR01815 JURUPA RD; GALENA; PYRITE; TYROLITE
VAR01817 AGATE ST; STONE AVE; JURUPA RD
VAR01870_2010 MISSION BLVD; HUMBLE; OPAL; LA RUE
VAR01873_2010 66TH ST; HOLMES; CHARLES; LORENA
VAR301765 MAVERICK LN; AVE DE PALMA; AVE JUAN BAUTISTA; COVELLO Page | 3
120
STAFF REPORT
DATE: FEBRUARY 6, 2025
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: PAUL TOOR, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.I
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF
JURUPA VALLEY AND STC TRAFFIC, INC. FOR DESIGN SERVICES FOR TWO TRAFFIC SIGNALS (CIP # 23107)
RECOMMENDATION
1. That the City Council approve the Professional Services Agreement between the City of Jurupa Valley and STC Traffic, Inc., of Carlsbad, California in the amount of $149,725.76, plus a 10% contingency of $14,973 for Design Services for Traffic Signals at the intersection of Rubidoux Boulevard and 24th Street, and the intersection of Wineville Road and Riverside Drive, CIP #23107 and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement in substantially the form and format attached to the staff report as approved by the City Attorney..
BACKGROUND
At its regular meeting on August 18, 2022, the City Council approved the Fiscal Year 2022-2023 through Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Capital Improvement Program (“CIP”), which includes CIP Project No. 23107, encompassing design services for traffic signals at the intersection of Rubidoux Boulevard and 24th Street, as well as the intersection of Wineville Road and Riverside Drive (the “Project”). The original scope of Project #23107 was limited to the intersection of Rubidoux Boulevard and 24 th Street. However, the intersection of Wineville Road and Riverside Drive was identified as a priority and subsequently added to the project due to potential safety concerns and traffic flow issues.
Currently, this intersection is controlled by an all -way stop, given the significant amount of truck t raffic and the presence of multiple travel lanes on Riverside Drive causing significant delays. Installing a signal at this location will improve traffic safety by providing a controlled intersection. While both intersections are not contiguous and are l ocated in different areas, both are crucial for enhancing traffic flow and improving safety. The
RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 1
STAFF REPORT
DATE: FEBRUARY 6, 2025
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: JOE PEREZ, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER / COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 15.J
AGREEMENT WITH CIVIC SOLUTIONS FOR THE PREPARATION OF
THE RUBIDOUX TOWN CENTER PLAN
______________________________________________________________________
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council approve an Agreement with C ivic Solutions, Inc. (CSI) for the preparation of the Rubidoux Town Center Plan in an amount not to exceed $396,145 and authorize the City Manager to sign the Agreement on the City Council’s behalf.
BACKGROUND
The preparation of the Rubidoux Town Center Plan will implement the “Town Center” policy direction of the General Plan. The General Plan identifies specific areas within the communities of Rubidoux, Glen Avon, and Pedley as “Town Centers.” The se are the historic areas of commerce in the City and are intende d to function as walkable, small downtown environments. Program LUE 5.1.7 of the General Plan sets forth the direction to “prepare an area plan for each of its three town centers to establish a consensus and a vision that is shared by the stakeholders and the City Council.” Of the three Town Centers identified in Jurupa Valley’s General Plan, Rubidoux was the first established and most complete traditional town center environment.
The City and its consultant team, completed the Draft Pedley Town Center Plan (“Pedley Plan” and community engagement effort in Winter 2023. We are currently preparing the needed CEQA documentation and General Plan Amendment that will be required for the City Council to consider adopting the Pedley Plan, with the goal of City Council adoption in first quarter 2025. Therefore, we are now ready to focus efforts on the second Town Center Plan, which will be for the Rubidoux area. This will also be a strategic vision plan, similar to the Pedley Plan, and is a nticipated to be adopted as an “Area Plan” of the General Plan.
RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2
It is anticipated that the Mission Boulevard Corridor will be a central focus of the Rubidoux Town Center Plan, including all topics identified in previous planning documents and through com munity engagement, certainly including but not limited to public safety, economic development and conservation and enhancement of small -town character.
Many of the concepts developed in the Pedley Plan and Citywide Corridors Plan will be applicable, or adaptable, to Mission Boulevard. The Rubidoux Town Center Plan will also address the surrounding Rubidoux neighborhoods, with a focus on public safety, multi - modal mobility and connections to Mission Boulevard, the community open space network, and the scale and character of potential infill housing.
If the agreement is approved, we will begin background analyses and initial stakeholder engagement in first quarter 2025 , and will work on the Rubidoux Town Center Plan through 2025. The planning effort is being funded entirely by Community Benefit Contribution payments received for the Agua Mansa Commerce Park and Agua Mansa Road Development Agreements for targeted planning and improvements in the Rubidoux area. The draft agreement is Attachment No. 1.
ANALYSIS
The Rubidoux Town Center Plan is intended to be a visioning document and strategic plan for this area of the City. The Rubidoux Town Center Plan aims to clarify a long-term vision for how the area should develop and improve in the future and provide implementation strategies for incremental change over time. The Rubidoux Town Center Plan will guide future development and public improvements to create a cohesive center that will anchor this historic area of the City and help solidify its identity within Jurupa Valley.
The Rubidoux Town Center Area Plan will not be regulatory but will establish a clear and distinct vision and provide additional clarity to the General Plan Town Center policy and guide future regulatory changes, which will be new Town Center Zoning that will be prepared with REAP 2.0 funds as part of SCAG’s Sustainable Communities Program .
The Rubidoux Town Center Plan will provide clear recommendations for the regulatory changes and other programmatic changes needed to achieve the vision that will be established as part of this process. It is important to note that this is a plan, not a project.
The Rubidoux Town Center Plan would direct how the area will be designed and developed in the future.
The scope of work for the Rubidoux Town Center Plan is described in detail in the attached proposal (Attachment 2), and is estimated to take approximately 12 months to complete.
Over the course of the last thirteen years, Civic Solutions, Inc. has provided the City with a full range of current and advance planning services. The City currently has a contract with Civic Solutions, Inc. for the preparation of the Pedley Town Center Plan and due to their excellent work would like to continue to work with Civic Solutions, Inc. on the preparation of the Rubidoux Town Center Plan.
Page | 4
Attachments:
1. Agreement between the City of Jurupa Valley and Civic Solutions, Inc. for the preparation of Rubidoux Town Center Plan
2. Rubidoux Town Center Plan Proposal dated January 29, 2025
Page | 1
STAFF REPORT
DATE: FEBRUARY 6, 2025
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: PAUL TOOR, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 17.A
PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER CALLING A SPECIAL ELECTION;
DECLARING THE RESULTS OF THE ELECTION; AND APPROVING
FORMATION AND LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES FOR CITY OF
JURUPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. PS 2024- 012 (PUBLIC SAFETY, WEST COAS T SELF STORAGE )
GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF CLAY
STREET AND GENERAL ROAD
RECOMMENDATION
1) Requested Action: That the City Council open the public hearing and take testimony, if any.
2) Following the public hearing, staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2025-12, entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF FORMATION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
JURUPA VALLEY, CALIF ORNIA, TO ESTABLISH CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FAC ILITIES DIS TRICT NO. PS 2024 -012 (PUBLIC
SAFETY, WEST COAST SELF-STORAGE), TO AUTHORIZE THE LEVY OF
A SPECIAL TAX THEREI N, AND TO SUBMIT THE ESTABLISHMENT OF
AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT AND THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS THEREOF; AND
3) That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2025-13, entitled:
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY,
CALIFORNIA, CALLING A SPECIAL ELECTION AND SUBMITTING TO THE
QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. PS 2024-012 (PUBLIC SAFETY, WEST COAST
SELF STORAGE ) PROPOSITIONS REGARDING THE ESTABLISHMENT
OF AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT AND THE ANNUAL LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX WITHIN THE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT; AND
RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2
4) That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2025-14, entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE RESULTS OF A SPECIAL
ELECTION IN CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT NO. PS 2024-012 (PUBLIC SAFETY, WEST COAST SELF
STORAGE) AND DIRECTING THE RECORDING OF A NOTICE OF
SPECIAL TAX LIEN; AND
5) That the City Council conduct a first reading and introduce Ordinance No. 2025- 04, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, ACTING IN ITS CAPACITY AS THE LEGISLATIVE
BODY OF CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTICT NO. PS 2024-012 (PUBLIC SAFETY, WEST COAST SELF -STORAGE)
AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX THEREIN
BACKGROUND
On December 19, 2024, the City Council took the first step in the process of forming CFD No. PS 2024-012 (Public Safety, West Coast Self Storage ) ("CFD"), composed of three (3) stand-alone mini self-storage facility buildings (light industrial), all buildings together totaling 60,663 square foot at build -out. At that time the City Council approved a Resolution of Intention, Resolution No. 202 4-130, to form the CFD and to authorize the levy of a special tax. At that meeting, the City Council set February 6, 2025 as the date for the public hearing.
The State legislature enacted the Mello -Roos Act of 1982 (the "Act") to assist public agencies in financing certain public services. The legal property owner, NWB Jurupa Valley LLC, requested that the City assist them in forming a district in order to cover the costs associated with providing law enforcement protection services.
The CFD will set up a special tax to generally cover costs associated with providing law enforcement protection services, including but not limited to:
The costs of contracting services;
Equipment, vehicles and supplies;
The salaries and benefits of City staff that directly provide law enforcement services;
City overhead costs associated with providing such services within the District; All other services necessary o r useful for, or in connection with, the authorized services listed above, including building a reserve fund for replacement and maintenance and for anticipated operating cost shortfalls.
Page | 3
ANALYSIS
The proposed CFD will have a Maximum Special Tax for the base fiscal year ending June 30, 2025 of:
SPECIAL TAX
Single Family Residential Property (D/U) $343.00
Multifamily Residential Property (D/U) $206.00
Commercial Retail Property (Building Square Feet) $0.126 Commercial Other Property (Building Square Feet) $0.094 Business Park Property (Building Square Feet) $0.084
Light Industrial Property (Building Square Feet) $0.044 Heavy Industrial Property (Building Square Feet) $0.037 These rates will increase based on the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index, for Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario area, with a maximum annual increase of 6% and a minimum annual increase of 2% of the Maximum Special Tax in effect in the previous fiscal year. The owners have filed a p etition representing their willingness to move forward.
OTHER INFORMATION
City Council initiated proceedings for the formation on December 19, 2024. (Resolution No. 2024-130).
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The individual property owners are responsible for the annual payments of special taxes.
The City will work with the County concerning the filing of the annual special tax to the County Auditor-Controller. At base year the estimated maximum annual assessme nt for the CFD is expected to be $2,669.17 as summarized below:
Building Proposed Use Building Size
(Square Feet)
FY 2024-25
Assessment
Building A Warehouse Self Storage 33,000 $1,452.00
Building B Warehouse Self Storage 21,863 $961.97
Page | 4
Building C Warehouse Self Storage 5,800 $255.20
The property owners have posted a deposit with their application to form the CFD, in order to cover City costs incurred in connection with the formation. Approval of the actions set forth in this staff report do not in any way commit the City to any financial contribution or liability by the CFD. The City's cost to administer the CFD annually will be reimbursed through the special taxes charged to property owners.
The revenue and expenses will be part of the City's FY 2025-2026 Adopted Budget, and there are no additional fiscal impacts.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Take no action.
2. Provide alternative direction to staff.
************************** SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE **************************
Page | 1
STAFF REPORT
DATE: FEBRUARY 6, 2025
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: PAUL TOOR, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 17.B
PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY
TO THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89 -1-CONSOLIDATED (THE
“DISTRICT”) AS ZONE JJ (VAN BUREN MARKETPLACE ) AND THE
LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN SUCH
TERRITORY; LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF VAN
BUREN BOULEVARD AND RUTILE STREET
RECOMMENDATION
1) That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2025-15, entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY; LOCATED AT
THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF VAN BUREN BOULEVARD AND RUTILE
STREET, TO CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89 -1-CONSOLIDATED AS ZONE JJ (VAN
BUREN MARKETPLACE ), CONFIRMING A DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT,
ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENTS AND THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN SUCH TERRITORY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024 -25 PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF PART 2 OF DIVISION 15 OF THE
CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE AND AS PROVIDED BY
ARTICLE XIII D OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
BACKGROUND
The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (the “Act”) and Article XIII D of the California Constitution (“Proposition 218”), requires the City Council conduct proceedings to annex territory into an assessment district formed under the Act and to levy assessments within such territory.
RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2
In connection with the City’s incorporation in 2011, the Loc al Agency Formation Commission of Riverside County (LAFCO) adopted its Resolution No. 12 -10 on July 22, 2010, to establish the Terms and Conditions of Incorporation, which require that the authority and responsibility for special assessment districts withi n the incorporated City associated with any County Landscape Maintenance District be transferred to the City upon its incorporation. By its Resolution No. 2011 -26, adopted on July 1, 2011, the City Council assumed all authority and responsibility for the special assessment districts within the incorporated City associated with any County Landscape Maintenance District and specifically assumed responsibility for any and all special assessments levied in connection with such districts.
The County’s Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89 -1-Consolidated (the “County District”), established pursuant to the provisions of the Act includes various territories located both within the incorporated boundaries of the City (the “City Territory”) and outside the incorporated boundaries of the City (the “County Territory”). Pursuant to its Resolution No. 2016-01 adopted on February 4, 2016, the City declared that the City Territory is a district under the 1972 Act, which is separate and distinct from the Count y Territory, and designated such territory as the “Jurupa Valley Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89-1-Consolidated.”
At its January 16, 2025, meeting, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 202 5-02 initiating proceedings for the annexation of territory to the Jurupa Valley Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89 -1-Consolidated (the “District”) as ZONE JJ (Van Buren Marketplace) (“ZONE JJ”) and the levy and collection of assessments within such territory. The territory proposed to be annexed includes four (4) parcels identified as APNs 167-330-006, 167-330-010, 167-330-015, and 167-110-039, generally located at the southwest corner of Van Buren Boulevard and Rutile Street.
Further, the City adopted Resolution No. 202 5-03 approving the engineer’s report regarding the annexation of territory to the District as ZONE JJ and to levy and collect assessments within such territory.
Further, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2025-04 declaring its intention to annex territory to the District and to levy and collect assessments within such territory for fiscal year 2024-2025. Resolution No. 2025-04 set February 6, 2025, as the public hearing date for protests to the levy of annual assessments and the annexation.
Subsequent to the January 16, 202 5, meeting and in accordance with the Act and Proposition 218, notice was mailed to the owners of the properties within the territory to be annexed, along with an assessment ballot for such owners to indicate support for, o r opposition to, the proposed annexation. The notice indicated the amount of the proposed assessment for their respective parcels and the date, time, and place of the public hearing.
Page | 3
ANALYSIS
It is proposed to include the additional parcels within the boundaries of the District and to levy assessments within such territory starting in fiscal year 2025-2026. Due to the timing of the proposed annexation, the original assessment shown in the engineer’s report was based on 2024 costs and will be escalated at the first levy in FY 2025-2026. Such territory is shown on a map on file in the office of the City Clerk and is open to public inspection.
At the public hearing, the City Council must hear and c onsider all oral and written statements, protests, objections or other communications made or filed with respect to the annexation of territory to the District and the levy and collection of annual assessments within such territory.
The assessment ballots must be tabulated at the public hearing. A majority protest exists if ballots submitted in opposition to the assessment and annexation exceed the ballots submitted in favor of the assessment and annexation. In tabulating the ballots, the ballots shall be w eighted according to the proportional financial obligation of the affected property. In the absence of a majority protest, the City Council may adopt a resolution ordering the annexation and levy and collection of assessments within the territory.
Adoption of Resolution Nos. 2025-15 would allow the City of Jurupa Valley to collect funds for the operation and maintenance of ZONE JJ facilities of this Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District.
Consistent with the City Council’s direction regarding compliance with Article XIII D of the California Constitution and the La ndscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, the attached Resolutions have been prepared and a public hearing scheduled for 7:00 p.m. on February 6, 2025 to receive testimony for and against the proposed assessments.
OTHER INFORMATION
City Council initiated proceedings for the annexation on January 16, 2025.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The property owners are responsible for the annual payments of the special assessment.
The City will file the special assessment with the County Auditor -Controller for inclusion on the annual property tax roll. The property owners have posted a deposit with their application to form ZONE JJ in order to cover City costs incurred in connection with the annexation. Approval of this resolution does not in any way commit the City to any financial contribution or liability by ZONE JJ . The City’s cost to administer ZONE JJ annually will be reimbursed through the special assessment charged to property owners.
The proposed annexation will have an initial Maximum Assessment for ZONE JJ in the amount of $55,780.30, to be divided by the number of Equivalent Benefit Units of each Page | 4
parcel within the zone boundary. These rates may be adjusted annually by the greater of four percent (4%) or the cumulative percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index over the base year of 2024. The owners have filed a petition representing their willingness to move forward.
The revenue from this special assessment will be d eposited into City of Jurupa Valley L&LMD 89-1-C and will be used to pay for the services provided in ZONE JJ as identified on the Engineer’s Report . Both the revenue and expenses will be part of the City’s FY 2025-2026 Adopted Budget, and there is no anticipated impact to the general fund.
CONCLUSION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 202 5-15, ordering annexation of territory to the District and the levy and collect assessments within such territory for fiscal year 2025-2026.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Take no action.
2. Provide staff with further direction.
************************** SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE **************************
Page | 1
120
D
STAFF REPORT
DATE: FEBRUARY 6, 2025
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: JOE PEREZ, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER / COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 18.A
WARMINGTON RESIDENTI AL PROJECT 7586 JURUPA ROAD
(MA23357); ADOPTION OF RE SOLUTION GRANTING FINAL
APPROVAL OF PROJECT, INCLUDING DENSITY BONUS
APPLICATION (DB) NO. 24001, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (TTM) NO. 38888, AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT (SDP) NO. 23172, WITH
DENIAL OF EITHER ONE OR TWO WA IVERS OF DEVELOPMENT
REQUIREMENTS; OVERRULE PLANNING COMMISSION’S DENIAL OF
MA23357; AND APPROVE ADDENDUM TO MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION; (APPLICANT: WARMINGTON RESIDENTIAL)
RECOMMENDATION
1. That the City Council adopt one of two Resolutions:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 2025-16, approving the Project but denying the requested waiver of landscaping requirements of Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Sections
9.240.550(E)(13)(B) and Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Section 9.240.550(E)(5) , which Resolution is entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY RESCINDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION’S DENIAL OF MASTER
APPLICATION NO. 23357 (PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2024- 20); APPROVING MASTER APPLICATION NO. 23357 CONSISTING OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 38888 (TTM 38888) AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 23172 (SDP 23172), APPROVING A DENSITY BONUS APPLICATION NO. 24001 (DB24001) TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF A PROJECT CONSISTING OF 67 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED HOMES AT 7586 JURUPA ROAD (APN 183-030-014) ALL SUBJECT TO 1) THE DENIAL OF THE
WAIVERS REQUESTED FOR THE LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS OF
JURUPA VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 9.240.550(E)(13)(B) AND JURUPA VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 9.240.550(E)(5), AND 2)
RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ; AND APPROVING AN AD DENDUM TO THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 15164 OF
THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT GUIDELINES
(WARMINGTON RESIDENTIAL PROJECT)
b. OR Adopt Resolution No. 202 5-17, approving the Project but denying the requested waivers of both 1) the one-story home requirements of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Sections 9.240.550(E)(3), and 2) the landscaping requirements of Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Sections 9.240.550(E)(13)(B) and Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Section 9.240.550(E)(5), which Resolution is entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY RESCINDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION’S DENIAL OF MASTER
APPLICATION NO. 23357 (PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2024- 20); APPROVING MASTER APPLICATION NO. 23357 CONSISTING OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 38888 (TTM 38888) AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 23172 (SDP 23172), APPROVING DENSITY BONUS
APPLICATION NO. 24001 (DB24001) TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF A PROJECT CONSISTING OF 67 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED HOMES AT 7586 JURUPA ROAD (APN 183-030-014) ALL SUBJECT TO 1) THE DENIAL OF THE
WAIVERS REQUESTED FOR BOTH THE ONE-STORY REQUIREMENTS OF JURUPA VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 9.240.550(E)(3) AND THE
LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS OF JURUPA VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS 9.240.550(E)(13)(B), AND 9.240.550(E)(5), AND 2) CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL; AND APPROVING AN ADDENDUM TO THE MITIGATED
NEGATIVE DECLARATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 15164 OF THE
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT GUIDELINES (WARMINGTON
RESIDENTIAL PROJECT)
BACKGROUND
On January 16, 2025, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing to consider Warmington Residential’s appeal of the Planning Commission’s denial of its application for Master Application No. 23357 (“Project”).
The proposed Project is a subdivision of 6.92 acres of land into sixty -seven (67) lots for single-family detached homes. The average lot size is approximately 3,036 square feet.
The proposed single -family homes would be two -story and range from 1,735 to 2, 039 square feet in floor area.
The proposed development would also include the following site improvements:
Residential amenities including open play areas, playground, covered BBQ area, dog park; private street improvements individual lot and streetscape landscaping; and decorative walls and fencing.
The proposed Project will require approval of the following entitlements: 1) Tentative Tract Map (TTM) No. 38888 to subdivide the 6.92 acres site into sixty-seven (67) lots for single- family detached homes, common areas, and private streets; 2) Site Development Permit Page | 3
(SDP) No. 23172 for detached single-family residential subdivisions that exceed a density of two (2) units per acre; and 3) Density Bonus to allow a 20% bonus in density from fifty- six (56) units to sixty-seven (67) units, one incentive/concession, and approval of waiver of development standards.
A copy of the January 16, 2025 Staff Report (without attachments) for the Project is attached.
COUNCIL ACTION ON JANUARY 16, 2025
Following the close of the public hearing, the City Council considered its options for action on the application for the Project.
It was recommended that the City Council direct Staff to bring back a resolution for adoption on February 6, 2025 that would implement one of the following four options:
1) Option 1. Rescinding the Planning Commission’s denial of the project and approving the project and adopting Addendum to Mitigated Negative Declaration; or
2) Option 2. Rescinding the Planning Commission’s denial of the project and approving the project but denying the waivers regarding the one story and landscape requirements set forth in Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Section 9.240.550(E)(3) and Section 9.240.550(E)(13), and adopting Addendum to Mitigated Negative Declaration; or
3) Option 3. Rescinding the Planning Commission’s denial of the project and approving the project but denying the waivers regarding the landscape requirements set forth in Section
9.240.550(E)(13), and adopting Addendum to Mitigated Negative Declaration; or
4) Option 4. Upholding the Planning Commission’s denial of the project.
Following City Council discussion, Mayor Berkson moved to direct Staff to bring back a resolution to the City Council that would uphold the Planning Commission’s denial of the Project, Option 4. The motion died for lack of a second.
Council Member Carmona then moved to direct Staff to bring back a resolution to the City Council that would rescind the Planning Commission’s denial of the project and approve the project but deny the waivers regarding the one story requirements set forth in Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Section 9.240.550(E)(3) and the landscaping requirements set forth in Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Section 9.240.550(E)(13), and adopting Addendum to Mitigated Negative Declaration, Option 2. The motion was seconded by Council Member Silva. Council Members Carmona, Sanchez and Silva voted yes on the motion. Mayor Berkson and Mayor Pro Tem Barajas voted no on the motion. It, therefore, passed on a vote of three in favor and two opposed.
Later in the meeting, Council Member Silva stated that he had mistakenly voted for the Option 2 motion when his intent had been to vote for Option 3, approval of the Project with only denial of the waiver for landscaping.
-1-
12774-0201\3067694v1.doc
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-16
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY RESCINDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION’S DENIAL OF
MASTER APPLICATION NO. 23357 (PLANNING CO MMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-20); APPROVING MASTER APPLICATION NO. 23357 CONSISTING OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 38888
(TTM38888) AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 23172 (SDP23172), APPROVING A DENSITY BONUS APPLICATION NO. 24001 (DB24001) TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF A PROJECT CONSISTING OF 67 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED HOMES AT 7586 JURUPA ROAD (APN
183-030-014) ALL SUBJECT TO 1) THE DENIAL OF THE WAIVERS
REQUESTED FOR THE LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS OF JURUPA
VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 9.240.550(E)(13)(B) AND
JURUPA VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 9.240.550(E)(5), AND 2) CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ; AND APPROVING AN ADDENDUM TO
THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 15164 OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
ACT GUIDELINES (WARMINGTON RESIDENTIAL PROJECT)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Previous Project. O n November 17, 2022, the City Council approved a General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation from LDR (Country Neighborhood) to MDR (Medium Density Residential), a Change of Zone (CZ) from A -1 (Light Agriculture) to R-4 (Planned Development) , Tentative Tract Map (TTM) No. 38 151, and Site Development Permit (SDP) No. 22089 to subdivide 6.92 acres into 35 lots for single -family detached homes at 7586 Jurupa Road (APN 183 -030-014) (“Madone Collection”). The Madone Collection project was not constructed.
Section 2. Current Project. Warmington Residential (the “Applicant”) applied for Tentative Tract Map No. 38888 and Site Development No. 23172, and a Density Bonus application (collectively, Master Application No. 23357 or MA No. 23357) to subdivide 6.92 acres into 67 lots for single family detached homes at 7586 Jurupa Road (APN 183-030-014) (the “Project”).
Section 3. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley does hereby find, determine and declare that:
(a) The application for MA No. 23357 was processed including, but not limited to, a public notice, in the time and manner p rescribed by State law and local law , including the California Environmental Quality Act.
(b) On October 9, 2024, the Planning Commission of the City of Jurupa Valley held a duly noticed public hearing on MA No. 23357 at which time all persons interested in the Project had the opportunity and did address the Planning Commission on these matters. The Planning Commission voted to continue the public hearing to October 23, 2024. -2-
12774-0201\3067694v1.doc
(c) The October 23, 2024 public hearing was cancelled due to lack of quorum. (d) On November 13, 2024, the Planning Commission of the City of Jurupa Valley held a duly noticed public hearing on MA No. 23357 at which time all persons interested in the Project had the opportunity and did address the Planni ng Commission on these matters.
Following receipt of public testimony, the Planning Commission closed the -public hearing-and voted unanimously to direct staff to prepare a resolution of denial for consideration at the next regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting.
(e) On December 11, 2024, the Planning Commission unanimously adopted Resolution No. 2024-20 denying the Project.
(f) On January 16, 2025, the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley held a duly noticed public hearing on MA No. 23357 at which ti me all persons interested in the Project had the opportunity and did address the City Council on these matters. Following receipt of public testimony, the City Council closed the public hearing -and directed staff to prepare a resolution approving MA No. 23 357 but denying the requested waiver of the requirement that 75% of the homes be one story and restrictions on the location of two-story homes pursuant to Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Section 9.240.550(E)(3) and denying the requested waivers of certain landscaping requirements set forth in Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Section 9.240.550(E)(3). (g) On February 6, 2025, the City Council clarified its tentative directions and adopted this Resolution as the final action on the Project. (h) All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
Section 4. Tentative Tract Map.
(a) The Applicant is seeking approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 38888 a Schedule “A” subdivision to subdivide the project site into 67 parcels. (b) Section 7.05.020.A. of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that the Jurupa Valley Planning Commission is designated as the “Advisory Agency” charged with the duty of making investigations and reports on the design and improvement of all proposed tentative Schedule “A” maps. Further, Section 7.05.020.A. of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that the Planning Commission is authorized to approve, conditionally approve or disapprove all such tentative map land divisions and report the action directly to the City Council and the land divider.
(c) Section 7.15.130.A. of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that within fifty (50) days after the date of filing of a tract map or commercial parcel map, a public hearing on the map must be held before the Planning Commission. Section 7.15.130.B . of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that after the close of the hearing, the Planning Commission must approve, conditionally approve, or disapprove the proposed tentative map, file notice of the decision with the City Clerk, and mail notice of t he decision to the land divider, or his or her authorized agent, and any interested party requesting a copy. -3-
12774-0201\3067694v1.doc
(d) Section 7.15.180 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code requires denial of a Tentative Parcel Map if it does not meet all of the requirements of Title 7 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code, or if any of the following findings are made:
1) That the proposed land division is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans.
2) That the design or improvement of the proposed land division is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans.
3) That the site of the proposed land division is not physically suitable for the type of development.
4) That the site of the proposed land division is not physically suitable for the proposed density of the development.
5) That the design of the proposed land division or proposed improvements are likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.
6) That the design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements are likely to cause serious public health problems. 7) That the design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements will conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of, property within the proposed land division. A land division may be approved if it is found that alternate easements for access or for use will be provided and that they will be substantially equivalent to ones previously acquired by the public. This subsection shall apply only to easements of record or to easements established by judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction. 8) Notwithstanding subsection 5) above, a tentative map may be approved if an environmental impact report was prepared with respect to the project and a finding was made, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. Resources Code Section 21000 et seq. ), that specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the environmental impact report.
Section 5. Site Development Permit.
(a) The Applicant is seeking approval of Site Development Permit No. 23172 to construct 67 single family detached homes on 6.92 acres. (b) Section 9.240.330.(3) of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code provides that no site development permit shall be approved unless it complies with the following standards:
1) The proposed use must conform to all the requirements of the City of Jurupa Valley General Plan and with all applicable requirements of State law and the ordinances of the City of Jurupa Valley.
-4-
12774-0201\3067694v1.doc
2) The overall development of the land shall be designed for the protection of the public health, safety and general welfare; to conform to the logical development of the land and to be compatible with the present and future logical development of the surrounding property. The plan shall consider the location and need for dedication and improvement of necessary streets and sidewalks, including the avoidance of traffic congestion; and shall take into account topographic al and drainage conditions, including the need for dedication and improvements of necessary structures as a part thereof. 3) All site development plans which permit the construction of more than one structure on a single legally divided parcel shall, in addition to all other requirements, be subject to a condition wh ich prohibits the sale of any existing or subsequently constructed structures on the parcel until the parcel is divided and a final map recorded in accordance with Title 7 of the Jurupa Valley Muni cipal Code in such a manner that each building is located on a separate legally divided parcel.
Section 6. Density Bonus Application.
(a) The Applicant submitted an application for a “density bonus” under Chapter
9.300 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code related to Site Development Permit No. 23172 for the construction of sixty-seven (67) single family residences. By agreeing to make three (3) units available to very low income households at an affordable cost, the Applicant is entitled to a twenty percent (20%) density bonus.
(b) The Applicant also seeks one incentive/concession. Specifically, the applicant seeks to not comply with offsite improvements to widen the Camino Real over and including the Flood Control spillway.
(c) The Applicant also seeks to deviate from 34 of the City’s development standards through the “waiver” provision under Government Code Section 65915(e). The specific development standards from which the Applicant seeks to deviate are set forth in subsection (d) below. Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Section 9.30.050(D) provides that the City shall approve a waiver or reduction of a development standard, unless it makes one (1) or more of the following findings:
1) The application of the development standard does not have the effect of physically precluding the construction of a housing development at the density allowed by the density bonus and with the incentives or concessions granted to the applicant; 2) The waiver or reduction of the development standard would have a specific, adverse impact, as defined i n Government Code Section 65589.5(d)(2) upon health, safety, or the physical environment, and for which there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific adverse impact;
3) The waiver or reduction of the development standard would have an adverse impact on any real property that is listed in the California Register of Historical Resources; or
-5-
12774-0201\3067694v1.doc
4) The waiver or reduction of the development standard would be contrary to state or federal law.
(d) The Applicant seeks to deviate from the following development standards:
Code Requirement Standard Request/Deviation Waiver
Number
JVMC
§ 9.100.040(A)
The minimum overall
area for each dwelling
unit, exclusive of the area
used for commercial
purposes and area set
aside for street rights -of-
way, but including
recreation and service
areas shall be 6,000
square feet.
Lots range from 2,498
square feet to 5,0 44
square feet. The average
lot size is 3,036 square
feet.
1 JVMC
§ 9.100.040(B)
The minimum lot area for
the individual lots used as
a residential building site
shall be 3,500 square feet.
Only six of the 67 lots are
larger than 3,500 square
feet. The other 61 lots
range in size from 2,498
square feet to 3,436
square feet.
2 JVMC
§9.100.040(B)
The minimum width of
each lot shall be 40 feet
and the minimum depth
shall be eighty (80) feet.
Only two of the 67 lots are
wider than 40 feet, the
remaining 65 lots range in
size from approximately
30 feet to 38.5 feet wide.
3 JVMC
§ 9.100.040(B)
The minimum width of
each lot shall be 40 feet
and the minimum depth
shall be 80 feet.
Although two of the 67
lots are wider than 40 feet,
the remaining lots range
from approximately 30
feet to 38.5 feet wide
4 JVMC
§ 9.100.040(D)(1)
The front yard shall be
not less than 20 feet,
measured from the
existing right -of-way as
shown on any Specific
Plan of Highways,
whichever is nearer th e
proposed structure.
With the exception of one
lot, front ya rd setbacks
range from 15 feet to 18
feet, 8 inches
5 -6-
12774-0201\3067694v1.doc
JVMC
§ 9.100.040(D)(2)
Side yards on interior and
through lots shall be not
less than a width of five
feet. Side yard on corner
and reverse d corner l ots
shall be not less than 10
feet from the existing
right-of-way or from any
future right -of-way as
shown on any Specific
Plan of Highways,
whichever is nearer the
proposed structure
One lot proposes side
yards that meet the
requirement.
Seven (7) lots propose
one side yard that meet
the requirement.
6, 7
JVMC
§ 9.100.040(D)(3)
The rear yard shall not be
less than 10 feet.
Three of the 67 lots have
a rear yard that is less than
10 feet. These three lots
have rear yards that are
8.4, 9.4, and 9.8 feet in
size.
8 JVMC
§ 9.100.040(D)(4)
No structural
encroachments shall be
permitted in the front,
side or rear yard except as
provided for in Section
9.240.180.
66 homes encroach into
the required front yard
setback.
66 homes encroach into
the required side yard
setback.
3 homes encroach into the
required rear yard
setback.
9 JVMC
§ 9.240.550(E)(2)
The minimum lot area is
as required under the
applicable zone
classification for the
subject property(s).
The minimum lot size
requirement in the R-4 is
3,500 square feet. Only
six of the 67 lots are larger
than 3,500 square feet.
The remaining lots range
in size from 2,498 square
feet to 3,436 square feet.
10 JVMC
§ 9.240.550(E)(3)
Building height. Single -
family residence shall not
exceed 35 feet in height
and more than two stories
pursuant to the following:
The proposed h omes do
not exceed 35 feet in
height, but all sixty-seven
(67) homes are proposed
at two (2) stories,
11, 12, 13
-7-
12774-0201\3067694v1.doc
(a) The number of lots
within the subdivision
with two st ory dwellings
shall not exceed 25%;
(b) No two story dwelling
may be located on a lot
adjacent to another two
story dwelling; and
(c) No two story
dwellings may be located
on a corner lot.
meaning that there are
two story homes that are
adjacent to one another,
and two story homes are
located on corner lots.
JVMC
§ 9.240.550(E)(4)
Floor area rati o. The
maximum FAR for a one
story dwelling, including
the garage, shall not
exceed 0.40. The
maximum FA R for the
ground floor of a two
story dwelling, including
the garage, shall not
exceed 0.25. The
maximum FA R for the
second floor of a two
story dwelling shall not
exceed 0.15.
All lots have a 1 st story
FAR of more than .25.
Average FAR for the 1 st
story is .42
All lots have a second
story FAR of more than
.15. Av erage FAR for
second story is .39.
14, 15
JVMC
§ 9.240.550(E)(5)
Open space. Not less than
50% of the lot area shall
be permeable open space.
Not less than 90% of the
required open space area
shall be landscaped.
Driveways to garages
located in the rear half
(½) of the lot shall not be
included in the permeable
open space calculation.
Only fourteen (14) homes
have more than fifty (50)
percent permeable open
space. The permeable
open space for the
remaining 53 homes
range from 39 to 49
percent. The project only
proposes to landscape the
front yard of each lot
which is less than the
required 90 percent.
16, 17
JVMC
§ 9.240.550(E)(6)
Setbacks. Provide
useable open space areas
with generous street side
setbacks that enhance the
visual appearance of t he
street parkway pursuant
to the following:
18, 19, 20, 21,
22 -8-
12774-0201\3067694v1.doc
(a) Front yard. Minimum
twenty (20) foot front
rear setback. Front yard
setbacks are required to
vary in length, it is
encouraged that there be
an average front yard
setback of twenty -five
(25) for the entire
subdivision.
c) Side yard, interior.
Minimum six (6) foot or
not less than ten (10)
percent of the lot width,
whichever is the greater
setback.
(d) Side yard, street
facing. Minimum ten (10)
foot setback.
(e) Rear yard. Minimum
of a twenty (20) foot
setback.
(f) Garage attached.
Street facing garages
shall be a minimum ten
(10) foot setback from the
front building line of the
dwelling and shall be side
facing in the front half of
the lot. Side entry garages
minimum of twenty -foot
front yard setback.
One lot meets this
requirement, the
remaining front ya rd
setbacks range from 15 to
18 feet, 8 inches.
Only one of 67 lots is
proposed to have both
side yards that meet the
requirement.
Only 7 of the 67 lots are
propose to have one side
yard that meets t he
requirement.
Six lots are proposed to
provide street facing side
yards. Three of the 6 lots
have side yards (street
facing) that are less than
10 feet.
Garages are not set back
ten (10) feet from the
front building line . All
garages are located in the
front half of the property
and are not side facing.
JVMC
§ 9.240.550(E)(7)
Garages. Garages
attached or detached shall
be a secondary feature of
the home. Garages facing
the street shall be located
in the rear half (½) of the
lot. Cor ner lot garages
shall not face the street
side yard.
All garages are located
within the front half of the
lot and corner lot garages
face the front yard/street.
23 JVMC
§ 9.240.550(E)(8)
Off-street parking and
driveways.
Although two covered
spaces are provided per
dwelling unit, less than 45
24, 25
-9-
12774-0201\3067694v1.doc
(a) A minimum of two
covered garage spaces per
dwelling unit.
(b) Minimum 45 feet
between driveway curb cuts
to accommodate two on -
street parking sp aces
between driveways. One
driveway curb cut per lot.
At the discretion of the
Public Works and
Community Development
Directors, shorter distances
between driveway cuts on
cul-de-sacs can be
approved.
feet is being p roposed in
between driveway curb
cuts. The space between
driveways ranges from
approximately 13 feet to
approximately 22 feet.
JVMC
§ 9.240.550(E)(9)
Streets.
(a) Street layout. Interior
streets shall connect to
the internal streets of
existing, adjacent
neighborhoods, schools,
commercial centers, civic
buildings, and parks.
(b) Street stub outs. Street
stub outs shall be
provided to connect to
future subdivisions.
(d) Rights -of-way.
Minimum fifty -six (56)
foot local street width.
Minimum sixty (60) foot
collector street width.
(e) Roadway width.
Maximum thirty-six (36)
foot local street width.
Maximum forty (40) foot
collector street width.
(f) Alley width.
Maximum twenty (20)
foot alley width.
(g) Parkway . For local
streets minimum 10 foot
parkway width. T he
parkway shall include a
five foot wide sidewalk
and the area between the
Interior streets do not
connect to internal streets
of any adjacent
properties.
Street stub outs are not
proposed as part of this
project.
The internal streets are 36
feet wide , which is less
than the 56 foot
minimum.
Twenty-six foot wide
roadway widths are
provided, which is less
than the 36 foot
minimum.
Alleys are proposed to be
26 feet wide which is
wider than the 20 fo ot
maximum.
Parkways are less than the
10 foot wide requirement,
26, 27, 28, 29,
30, 31
-10-
12774-0201\3067694v1.doc
sidewalk and the curb
shall be landscaped
unless obstructed by
public signage, fire
hydrants or other safety
equipment, or utility
equipment. For non-local
streets, the minimum
parkway width is 15 feet.
At the discretion of the
Public Works and
Community
Development Directors
parkway widths can be
modified.
(h)Traffic calming
features. Subdivisions
shall include traffic -
calming features such as
traffic circles, bulb -outs,
center islands, chicanes,
speed humps, bicycle
lanes/shared lane
markings (sharrows), or
other traffic calming
devices designed to
minimize conflicts
between vehicles and
pedestrians, equestrians,
and bicycles.
as t he parkways are
proposed at 5 feet and do
not include landscape
planters.
JVMC
§ 9.240.550(E)(13)
Landscaping and
walls/fences. The
composition and location
of landscaping shall
comply with the
provisions of Chapter
9.283 of this Code and
the following standards:
(a) Street trees. A
minimum of one canopy
tree per lot or 40 feet of
street frontage when
permissible. Street trees
shall be a minimum of
two inch caliper
measured six feet above
The project does not
propose street trees as the
proposed parkways do not
include a landscape
planter.
32, 33, 34
-11-
12774-0201\3067694v1.doc
the ground. A tree
landscaped area shall be
provided and be of an
appropriate size to
accommodate the mature
size and height of the
tree. Trees shall be
located between the
sidewalk and the curb.
(b) Landscaping
area. The front yard
setback area shall be
landscaped and include a
minimum of one (1) 36
inch box canopy tree. The
rear yard setback shall be
landscaped. 90% of the
required lot open space
shall be landscaped.
(c) Natural
features. Single-family
residential subdivisions
shall protect and preserve
natural features such as,
without limitation,
unique natural terrain,
rock outcroppings,
streams (perennial,
intermittent, ephemeral),
mature trees, and native
habitat.
The project proposes
front yard trees for 65 of
the 67 lots. The proposed
trees will be 24 inch box
which do not meet the
minimum requirement of
36 box.
The project does not
propose rear yard setback
landscaping.
The Project does not
propose 90% of the
required open space to be
landscaped.
The project does not
propose to protect or
preserve natural features.
Section 7. California Environmental Quality Act.
(a) On November 17, 2022, the City Council adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration (“MND”) and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ( “MMRP”) for the Madone Collection by Resolution No. 2022-109.
(b) The City has ca used an Addendum to be prepared to the previously approved MND in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 because the approval of the Project does not require the preparation of a new or Supplemental Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164.
-12-
12774-0201\3067694v1.doc
(c) Consistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, the City Council finds and determines that an Addendum to the MND i s the appropriate environmental document to analyze the Project because:
1) Some changes or additions to the MND are necessary, but none of the conditions described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent MND have occurred.
2) There are no substantial changes proposed by the Project that will require major revisi ons to the MND due to the inv olvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; 3) No substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken that will require major revisions to the MND due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and 4) There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the MND was adopted showing that: (a) the changes proposed with the Project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the MND; (b) th ere are significant effects previously examined that will be substantially more severe than shown in the MND; (c) there are mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measures or alternative; or (d) mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the MND would substantially reduce one or mo re significant effects on the environment, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.
(d) The Addendum to the MND and revised MMRP, attached hereto as Exhibit A, is hereby adopted.
(e) The custodian of records for the MND, MMRP , revised MMRP, and Addendum, and all other materials that constitute the record of proceedings is the Community Development Department of the City of Jurupa Valley. Those documents are available for public review in the Community Development Department located at 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, California 92509.
Section 8. Findings for Approval of Tentative Tract Map. In approving the Tentative Tract Map No. 38888, the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley finds and determines that:
(a) The proposed land division is con sistent with applic able general and specific plans . The General Plan land use designation is MHDR (Medium High Density Residential) and although the maximum density in the MHDR land use is eight (8) dwelling units per acre, state density bonus l aw grants t he project a 20% density bonus. Without the implementation of State Density Bonus Law, the Project’s base density of 55.36 (rounded up to 56) is consistent with the MHDR land use designation.
-13-
12774-0201\3067694v1.doc
(b) The design or improvement of the proposed land division is consistent with applicable general and specific plans because the project will support the General Plan ’s encouragement to establish high quality neighborhoods that have a range of housing styles, affordability, and attract homebuyers to the City.
(c) The site of the proposed land division is physically suitable for the type of development because the Project site is undeveloped and can physically accommoda te the proposed single family residential lots.
(d) The site of the proposed land division is physically suitable for the proposed density of the development because under State Density Bonus Law the City is required to provide a density bonus of up to 20% and is required to waive certain development standards to ensure that the construction of the 67 single family residences can be accommodated on the Project site. (e) The design of the proposed land division or proposed improvements is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat because the City has prepared an Mitigated Negative Declaration which analyzed potential impacts to fish or wildlife or their habitat and prepared appropriate mitigation measures to reduce impacts to a level of less than significant. (f) The design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems because the Project meets all the standards of Title 7 (Subdivision) of the Municipal Code to ensure the project design meets safety standards and requirements that ensure the proposed project is adequate for health, safety, and general warfare of the community.
(g) The design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of, property within the proposed land division.
Section 9. Findings for Approval of Site Development Permit . In approving Site Development Permit 23172, the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley finds and determines that:
(a) The Project is consistent w ith the General Plan, zoning ordinance, and applicable State law. The General Plan land use designation is MHDR (Medium High Density Residential) and although the maximum density in the MHDR land use is eight (8) dwelling units per acre, state density bonu s law grants the project a 20% density bonus. Without the implementation of State Density Bonus Law, the Project’s base density of 55.36 (rounded up to 56) is consistent with the MHDR land use designation.
(b) The combination of the site design, building desig n, compliance with all applicable development standards, miti gation measures, and conditions of approval will ensure that the Project as designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The Project is consistent with the logic al development of the land use and with the surrounding land uses. The Project site offers a unique opportunity to develop an entry level traditional single-family neighborhood with various architectural styles, tree lined streets, open space, and recreati onal amenities. The Project meets some of the applicable development standards of the R -4 zone and -14-
12774-0201\3067694v1.doc
the Traditiona l Neighborhood Design Standards, but seeks a waiver of some development standards as permitted under State Density Bonus Law.
(c) The Project considers the location and need for dedication and improvement of necessary streets and sidewalks, including the avoidance of traffic congestion in that it includes public right -of-way improvements along Camino Real, and sufficient on -site pedestrian and vehicular access, and vehicular parking.
(d) The Project takes into account topographical and drainage conditions, including the need for dedication and improvements of necessary structures as a part thereof in that topographical and drainage conditions have been addressed through an approved Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan and proposed Conditions of Approval recommended by the City’s Engineering Department.
(e) The proposed Site Development Permit No. 23172 does not permit the construction of more than one structure on a single legally divided parcel.
Section 10. Findings for Approval of Density Bonus Application. In approving the Density Bonus Application, with the exception of a waiver of the requirements in Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Section s 9.240.550(E)(13)(b) and (E)(5) the City Council makes the following findings:
(a) Density Bonus. The Project site is 6.92 acres in size and has a land use designation of Medium High Density Residential. Under the land use designation, the Applicant is permitted to construct a maximum of 8 dwelling units per acre for a total of 55.36 units, which under State Density Bonus Law is rounded to 56 units. The Applicant is proposing a project with 5% of the base density units (equaling 3 units) to be reserved and sold at an affordable cost to very low income households. Government Code section 65915(b)(1) provides that a city shall grant one density bonus if an applicant for a housing development seeks and agrees to construct a housing development with five percent of the total units o f a housing development restricted for rental or sale to very low income households, as defined in Section 50105 of the Health and Safety Code. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65915(f)(2) , this entitles the Applicant to a 20% density bonus, which equa tes to a total of 68 units. The Applicant is, however, only seeking to construct 67 units. The City Council hereby grants the density bonus allowing the Applicant to construct 67 units.
(b) Incentive/Concession. Government Code section 65915( d)(2) provides that a city shall grant one incentive or concession if an applicant for a housing development seeks and agrees to construct a housing development with at least five percent of the total units of a housing development restricted for rental or sal e to very low income households, as defined in Section 50105 of the Health and Safety Code. The Applicant seeks an incentive/concession to not construct the following offsite improvements: Widening of Camino Real over and including flood control spillway. The City Council hereby grants this incentive/concession. (c) Waiver of Development Standards.
1) Government Code section 65915(e)(1) provides that in no case may a city apply any development standard that will have the effect of physically precluding the -15-
12774-0201\3067694v1.doc
construction of a development meeting the criteria of subdivision (b) at the densities or with the concessions or incentives permitted by this section. Moreover, Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Section 9.300.050(D) provides that the City shall approve a waiv er unless it makes a finding that the “application of the development standard does not have the effect of physically precluding the construction of a housing development at the density allowed by the density bonus and with the incentives or concessions granted to the applicant“ or one of the other applicable findings. 2) The City Council hereby grants 32 of the 34 waivers requested by the Applicant, as set forth in Section 6 above.
3) Denial of Waiver of Landscaping Requirements JVMC Sections
9.240.550(E)(5) and 9.240.550(E)(13)(b). The City Council denies the waiver of the development standards set forth in Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Section 9.240.550(E)(13)(b) which mandates that the lots provide one, thirty-six (36) inch box tree in the front yard, that the rear yard setback be landscaped, and that ninety (90) percent of the required open space of each lot be landscaped.
The City Council further denies the waiver of the development standard set forth in Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Section 9.240.550(E)(5 ) which requires that ninety (90) percent of the required open space of each lot be landscaped. The City is only required to waive a development standard if the imposition of that development standard would physically preclude the construction of the project at the density or with the concession/incentive permitted by state law. In this instance, the Applicant can physically construct 67 single family residences and still comply with the requirements set forth in Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Section 9.240.550(E)(13)(b) and (E)(5).
Additionally, a waiver of the standards set forth in Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Section
9.240.550(E)(13)(b) and (E)(5) would have a specific, adverse , cumulative impact, as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Sectio n 65589.5, upon health of persons in the Project and in the community, set forth in the and for which there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific, adverse impact. Policies AQ 2.2, AQ 2.4 of the Air Quality Element of the City’s General Plan provide for the planting of landscaping, vegetation and trees in order to trap particulate materials and control pollution with their attendant adverse impacts upon the health of people residing in the Project and the City. As such the City Council hereby denies the Applicant’s specific requests to waive the requirements in J urupa Valley Municipal Code Section
9.240.550(E)(13)(b) and the requirements set forth in Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Sections
9.240.550(E)(5).
Section 11. Approval of Master Application No. 21143 with Conditions. Based on the foregoing, the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley hereby approves Master Application No. 21143, comprised of Tentative Tract Map No. 38888, Site Development Permit No. 23172 and Density Bonus Application No. 24001, to allow the construction of 67 single family detached homes on 6.92 acres of land at 7586 Jurupa Road (APN: 183-030-014), all subject to: 1) the denial of the waivers requested for the landscaping requirements of Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Section 9.240.550(E)(13)(b) and Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Section 9.240.550(E)(5); and 2) the conditions of approval attached hereto as E xhibit “B” and incorporated herein as though set forth in full.
-16-
12774-0201\3067694v1.doc
Section 12. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 6th day of February, 2025.
______________________________
Brian Berkson
Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Victoria Wasko, CMC
City Clerk
-17-
12774-0201\3067694v1.doc
CERTIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )
I, Victoria Wasko, City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby cert ify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2025-16 was duly passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on the 6th day of February 2025, by the following votes, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 6th day of February, 2025.
___________________________
Victoria Wasko, City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
Exhibit A Addendum to Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigated Monitoring and Reporting Program
ADDENDUM No. 1
to the
ADOPTED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
(MA21143)
Madone Collection Planned Residential Development
Amendment to Tentative Tract Map No. 38151
City of Jurupa Valley Master Application 23357
Lead Agency
City of Jurupa Valley
8930 Limonite Avenue
Jurupa Valley, CA 92509
Contact: Miguel Del Rio, Senior Planner
(951) 332-6464 ext. 252
[email protected]
Project Proponent:
Warmington Residential California, Inc
3090 Pullman Street
Costa Mesa, CA 92676
April 15 , 2024, Revised July 31, 2024
MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024
Table Of Contents
1.0 Determination .................................................................................................................................................................. 3
2.0 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................................... 3
3.0 Project Description .......................................................................................................................................................... 3
4.0 Analysis of Potential Environmental Effects ................................................................................................................. 7
4.1 Aesthetics .......................................................................................................................................................................... 7
4.2 Agriculture Resources ..................................................................................................................................................... 9
4.3 Air Quality ..................................................................................................................................................................... 11
4.4 Biological Resources ...................................................................................................................................................... 15
4.5 Cultural Resources ........................................................................................................................................................ 19
4.6 Energy ............................................................................................................................................................................. 22
4.7 Geology and Soils ........................................................................................................................................................... 26
4.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions ........................................................................................................................................... 29
4.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials .............................................................................................................................. 31
4.10 Hydrology and Water Quality ...................................................................................................................................... 34
4.11 Land Use and Planning ................................................................................................................................................. 38
4.12 Mineral Resources ......................................................................................................................................................... 40
4.13 Noise ................................................................................................................................................................................ 41
4.14 Population and Housing ................................................................................................................................................ 44
4.15 Public Services ............................................................................................................................................................... 46
4.16 Recreation ...................................................................................................................................................................... 50
4.17 Traffic and Circulation ................................................................................................................................................. 52
4.18 Tribal Cultural Resources ............................................................................................................................................ 56
4.19 Utilities and Service Systems ........................................................................................................................................ 60
4.20 Wildfire ........................................................................................................................................................................... 64
5.0 CONCLUSION .............................................................................................................................................................. 65
MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024
Appendices
Appendix A: CalEEMod Datasheets, March 27, 2023
Appendix B: Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Consistency Analysis and Biological Report, LSA Associates, Inc., January 2024.
Appendix C: Phase II Environmental Site Assessment, Stantec Consulting Services Inc., November 7, 2023.
Appendix D: Preliminary Hydrology Report, Adkan Engineers, February 14, 2024.
Appendix E: Preliminary WQMP, Adkan Engineers, December 15, 2023.
Appendix F: Technical Noise Memorandum for the Madone Residential Development in Jurupa Valley, California, LSA Associates, Inc., February 5, 2024.
Appendix G: Madone Residential Project Trip Generation and Vehicle Miles Traveled Analysis, LSA Associates, Inc., February 02, 2024.
Appendix H: First Renewal Water and Sewer Availability (Letter), Jurupa Community Services District, March 25, 2024.
MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024
1.0 Determination
Based on the evaluation in this document, I find that no substantial changes are proposed in the Project and there are no substantial changes in the circumstances under which the Project will be undertaken that will require major revisions to the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) due to the involvement of significant new environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. Also, there is no "new information of substantial importance" as that term is used in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a)(3). Therefore, the previously Adopted MND is adequate upon completion of an ADDENDUM.
City of Jurupa Valley
Signature Agency
Joe Perez, Community Development Director April 15, 2024, Revised July 31, 2024 Printed Name/Title Date:
2.0 Introduction
This document is an Addendum to the Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration Madone Collection Planned Residential Development, (“ MND") and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) Adopted by the City Council on November 17, 2022, by Resolution No. 2022-109. Its purpose is to substantiate the City of Jurupa Valley's determination that no supplemental or subsequent environmental review is required prior to considering the approval of the Amendment to Tentative Tract Map (TTM) No. 38151 and Site Development Permit (SDP) No. 22089.
3.0 Project Description
3.1 Project Location and Setting
The Project site is located on approximately 6.92 acres at 7586 Jurupa Road. The site is located on the south side of Jurupa Road, with Camino Real to the east, Camino Real Elementary School to the south, residential uses to the west and northeast, and Patriot High School to the northwest. The Project site is identified by the following Assessor Parcel Number (APN): 183-030-014. (See Figure 3.1- Vicinity Location Map and Aerial Photo).
MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024
Figure 3.1- Vicinity Location Map/Aerial Photo
MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024
3.2 Approved Project Description:
In 2022, the City Council approved Tentative Tract Map (TTM) No. 3815, Site Development Permit (SDP) No. 22089, a General Plan Amendment (GPA) to change the land use designation from LDR (Country Neighborhood) to MDR (Medium Density Residential), a Change of Zone (CZ) from A -1 (Light Agriculture) to R -4 (Planned Development) The Project is called Madone Collection Residential Development with the TTM approved to subdivide 6.92 acres into 35 lots for single -family detached houses. The Project included recreational area park, dog park, walking trails, exercise stations, tot lot , Gazebo and BBQ areas, and sitting areas. The R -4 zone allows for lot sizes of a minimum overall site area of 6,000 square-feet for each dwelling unit and a minimum lot area of 3,500 square-feet.
See Exhibit 3.3-1- Site Plan for Approved Project below.
Exhibit 3.3-1 Site Plan for Approved Project Site Plan
MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024
3.3 Proposed Modified Project Description
The Modified Project proposes modifications to the approved TTM and increase the number of lots to 67 lots for single-family detached houses. The Project is requesting the density increase per the State Density Bonus Law which would provide for a density bonus of 20 percent. 1 The Project’s density of 67 residential units represents a density bonus of 16 percent. The approved GPA and CZ will not be changed by the modified Project.
The proposed Project will include recreational area park, dog park, tot lot, Gazebo and BBQ areas, and sitting areas. The proposed Project lot sizes of a minimum overall site area of 2,498 square-feet and a maximum of 5,044 square-feet with an average of 2,974.6 square-feet.
See Exhibit 3.3-2- Site Plan for Proposed Project below.
Exhibit 3.3-2 Site Plan for Proposed Modified Project
1 State Density Bonus Law Request Letter for 7586 Jurupa Road Project dated June 30, 2023, included as Appendix A.
MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024
4.0 Analysis of Potential Environmental Effects
CEQA Guidelines §15164 provides for the use of an Addendum to document the basis of a lead agency's decision not to require a Subsequent or Supplemental MND for a change to a project that has been analyzed in an Adopted MND. The lead agency's decision to use an Addendum must be supported by substantial evidence that the conditions that would trigger the preparation of a Subsequent MND, as provided in CEQA Guidelines §15162, are not present. The following discussion provides the basis for this conclusion.
4.1 Aesthetics
Except as provided in Public Resources Code Section
21099, would the project
New Potentially
Significant
Impact
New Mitigation
Required Reduced Impact No New Impact
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
4.1.1 Summary of MND Conclusions
4.1.A The Adopted MND found there are no designated scenic vistas on or surrounding the project site, and compliance with existing General Plan policies and design guidelines would further ensure development of the project would have less than significant impact on scenic vistas.
Based on the analysis , no public views of a scenic vista would be significantly or permanently blocked with implementation of PPP 4.1.1 and 4.1.2.
4.1.B Existing rock outcropping to the west of the project site on Rattlesnake Mountain would be preserved and buffered from the project site by open space . There are no historic buildings or significant trees associated with the project site. In addition, according to the General Plan, the Project site is not located within or adjacent to a scenic corridor or roadway2.
4.1.C In addition, according to the General Plan , the Project site is not located within or adjacent to a scenic corridor or roadway3.
2City of Jurupa Valley, General Plan Conservation and Open Space Element, Figure 4-23: Jurupa Valley scenic corridors and roadways 3City of Jurupa Valley, General Plan Conservation and Open Space Element, Figure 4-23: Jurupa Valley scenic corridors and roadways
MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024
The project would comply with the City’s building height regulations, design standards, and guidelines for residences as required by PPP 4.1-1 and 4.1-2. Implementation of the project would not substantially degrade the existing character or quality of the project site.
4.1.D Impacts due to light and glare will be less than significant with implementation of existing zoning standards and PPP 4.1 -3. The primary exterior of the future structures will be typical of single-family detached housing and consist of non-reflective materials including stucco exterior and tile or metal roofing materials. Therefore, potential glare from the proposed Project is considered to be less than significant.
4.1.2 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
There are no unavoidable adverse impacts identified in the Adopted MND.
4.1.3 Applicable General Plan Policies
PPP 4.1.1 As required by Municipal Code section 9.115.040 (3 ), no building or structure shall exceed fifty (50) feet in height, unless a greater height is approved pursuant to Section
9.240.370. In no event, however, shall a building or structure exceed seventy -five (75) feet in height, unless a variance is approved pursuant to Section 9.240.270.
PPP 4.1-2 As required by Jurupa Valley Municipal Code section 7.50.010, all utilities serving and within the Project site shall be placed underground unless exempted by this section.
PPP 4.1-3 All outdoor lighting shall be designed and installed to comply with California Green Building Standard Code Section 5.106 or with a local ordinance lawfully enacted pursuant to California Green Building Standard Code Section 101.7, whichever is more stringent.
4.1.4 Applicable Adopted MND Mitigation Measures
As described in the Adopted MND , impacts related to aesthetics were determined to be less than significant and no mitigation measures were identified.
No substantial changes in the environment related to aesthetics will occur with the Project modifications that would lead to more significant impacts, and no new mitigation measures are required.
4.1.5 Proposed Project Impact Analysis
Development of the Proposed Project has the potential to impact visual and scenic resources. Based on an examination of the analysis, findings, and conclusions of the Adopted MND , implementation of the proposed modifications would not substantially increase the severity of significant impacts
MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024
previously identified, nor would new significant impacts related to Scenic Vistas, Scenic Resources, Visual Character, and Light and Glare that were not identified in the Adopted MND .
The boundaries of the Project site are not changing as part of the proposed modified Project and the site is not located within a scenic vista, a State scenic highway.
The Adopted MND and related implementing actions established goals and policies for development of the Project. Development of the Proposed Project will be constructed in light of the policies of the General Plan, Municipal Code, and the approved Conditions, and the Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.
4.2 Agriculture Resources
New Potentially
Significant
Impact
New Mitigation
Required Reduced Impact No New Impact
Would the project
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps
prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non‐
agricultural use?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
Note: Because there are no forestry resources located in the City of Jurupa, the topic of Forestry Resources was not addressed in the Adopted MND.
4.2.1 Summary of MND Conclusions
4.2.A The Project site is designated as “Urban and Built-Up Land” by the State Department of Conservation4. The Project site does not contain any lands designated as Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance as mapped by the State Department of Conservation Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program. In addition, no properties abutting the Project site are classified as Farmland. The City of Jurupa Valley’s General Plan considers agricultural land to be an appropriate use of land until such time as a property owner considers farming to be no longer economically viable which is why the General Plan designates agricultural land for eventual suburban and urban uses. Therefore, the proposed Project would not result in the conversion of any Farmland to non-agricultural use. Therefore, there are no impacts.
4California Department of Conservation, Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program, https://databasin.org/datasets/b83ea1952fea44ac9fc62c60dd57fe48 , accessed August 30, 2022.
MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024
4.2.B The current land use for the site is Country Neighborhood and zoning classification for the site is A -1 (Light Agriculture). The County Neighborhood designation and the A -1 zoning classification agricultural zones are A -2 (Heavy Agriculture), and A -D (Agriculture-Dairy). Based on this, the site is not considered a primary agricultural zone.
The site is currently not being used for agricultural purposes. The Project is proposing a change of zone to R -4 (Planned Residential). The R -4 Zone is intended to allow development of subdivisions containing open areas that will be used for recreation purposes and is not considered a primary agriculture zone. T herefore, the Project would not conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use.
Williamson Act
There are no agricultural uses or Williamson Act contracts associated with the project site. According to the County of Riverside Map My County (RCIT), the site is not within an agricultural preserve.5 Since the Project site does not have any current agricultural use and is not identified as farmland, implementation of the proposed Project will not convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland) as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use. The Project therefore will have no impacts on existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract.
4.2.2 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
There are no unavoidable adverse impacts identified in the Adopted MND .
4.2.3 Applicable General Plan Policies
There were no GP Policies identified in the Approved Project Adopted MND .
4.2.4 Applicable Adopted MND Mitigation Measures
As described in the Adopted MND , impacts related to agricultural resources were determined to be less than significant and no mitigation measures were identified.
No substantial changes in the environment related to agricultural resources will occur with the Project modifications that would lead to more significant impacts, and no new mitigation measures are required.
5 Riverside County Map My County (RCIT), Planning Layers Agricultural Preserves https://gis1.countyofriverside.us/Html5Viewer/?viewer=MMC_Public , accessed August 31, 2022.
MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024
4.2.5 Proposed Project Impact Analysis
Development of the Proposed Project will have no impact agricultural resources . Based on an examination of the analysis, findings, and conclusions of the Adopted MND , implementation of the proposed modifications would not substantially increase the severity of significant impacts previously identified, nor would new significant impacts related to agricultural resources that were not identified in the Adopted MND .
Implementation of the Project would not result in significant impacts to Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance; conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or a Williamson Act contract; or result in loss or conversion of farmland or forest land because these resources do not exist within the area impacted by the Project.
The Adopted MND and related implementing actions established goals and policies for development of the Project. Development of the Proposed Project will be constructed in light of the policies of the General Plan, Municipal Code, and the approved Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.
4.3 Air Quality
New Potentially
Significant
Impact
New Mitigation
Required Reduced Impact No New Impact
Would the project
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard??
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
e) Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) affecting a substantial number of people? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
4.3.1 Summary of MND Conclusions
4.3.A The Project would develop 35 residential units and would not produce substantially more criteria pollutant emissions than would occur under buildout of the project site under the existing Light Industrial General Plan designation and that were assumed as a basis for the AQMP because of the potential for fewer heavy-duty truck trips and emissions from industrial processes. Furthermore, the proposed project includes a General Plan Amendment to change the project site from Light Industrial to Medium Density Residential, Medium High Density Residential, and High Density Residential. Upon approval of this General Plan Amendment, the project site would be consistent with the underlying assumptions used for future AQMP
MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024
updates. Additionally, the City uses the SCAQMD thresholds for determining the potential significant impacts a project may have on air quality. T he proposed project would not generate emissions that would exceed the SCAQMD thresholds.
4.3.B Emissions resulting from the Project construction and operations will not exceed criteria pollutant thresholds established by the SCAQMD for emissions of any criteria pollutant.
Impacts are less than significant for construction and operations emissions.
4.3.C The project would not exceed SCAQMD thresholds for construction or operations.
Accordingly, the proposed project would not result in a cumulatively considerable increase in emissions of nonattainment pollutants or their precursors (e.g., VOC and NOx for O3,). Thus, pursuant to the SCAQMD CEQA Handbook cumulative impacts would be less than significant.
4.3.D Proposed construction activities would not generate emissions in excess of site-specific Localized Significance Thresholds ( LSTs); therefore, site -specific project construction impacts would be less than significant.
4.3.E Land uses and industrial operations that typically are associated with odor complaints include agricultural uses, wastewater treatment plants, food-processing plants, c hemical plants, composting, refineries, landfills, dairies, and fiberglass molding. The proposed project would not include any of these land uses and instead would develop 35 residential dwelling units, which are not a land use typically associated with odor complaints. Therefore, it is not anticipated that any operational sources under the project would result in objectionable odors, and any odor impacts resulting from the proposed project would be less than significant.
4.3.2 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
There are no unavoidable adverse impacts identified in the Adopted MND .
4.3.3 Applicable General Plan Policies
PPP 4.3-1 The Project is required to comply with the provisions of South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 403, “ Fugitive Dust.” Rule 403 requires implementation of best available dust control measures during construction activities that generate fugitive dust, such as earth moving and stockpiling activities, grading, and equipment travel on unpaved roads.
PPP 4.3-2 The Project is required to comply with the provisions of South Coast Air Quality District Rule 431.2, “Sulphur Content and Liquid Fuels .” The purpose of this rule is to limit the sulfur content in diesel and other liquid fuels for the purpose of both reducing the formation of sulfur oxides and particulates during combustion and to enable the use of add-on control devices for diesel fueled internal combustion engines.
MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024
PPP 4.3-3 The Project is required to comply with the provisions of South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 1113 , “Architectural Coatings” Rule 1113 limits the release of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) into the atmosphere during painting and application of other surface coatings.
PPP 4.3-4 The Project is required to comply with the provisions of South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 1186 “PM10 Emissions from Paved and Unpaved Roads and Livestock Operations” and Rule 1186.1, “Less‐Polluting Street Sweepers.” Adherence to Rule 1186 and Rule 1186.1 reduces the release of criteria pollutant emissions into the atmosphere during construction.
4.3.4 Applicable Adopted MND Mitigation Measures
As described in the Adopted MND , impacts related to air quality were determined to be less than significant and no mitigation was identified or required in the Adopted.
No substantial changes in the environment related to air quality will occur with the Project modifications that would lead to more significant impacts, and no new mitigation measures are required.
4.3.5 Proposed Project Impact Analysis
To determine the impacts of construction and operations air quality emissions the CalEEMod program was used to model both the approved and proposed projects’ estimated emissions. The proposed project’s air quality emissions as indicated in Table 4.3 -1 (Construction Emissions) and Table 4.3 -2 (Operational Emissions) will remain below the City’s screening thresholds and SCAQMD’s significance thresholds for air quality and therefore be less than significant.
Based on an examination of the analysis, findings, and conclusions of the Adopted MND , implementation of the proposed modifications would not substantially increase the severity of significant impacts previously identified, nor would new significant impacts related to air quality that were not identified in the Adopted MND .
The Adopted MND and related implementing actions established goals and policies for development of the Project. Development of the Proposed Project will be constructed in light of the policies of the General Plan, Municipal Code, and the approved Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.
MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024
Table 4.3-1: Summary of Peak Construction Emissions
Source Emissions (lbs/day)
VOC/ROG NOX CO SOX PM10 PM2.5
Approved Project Maximum Daily
Emissions
22.1 36.0 34.4 0.06 9.49 5.47
Proposed Project Maximum Daily
Emissions
41.6 36.0 34.4 0.06 9.49 5.47
SCAQMD Regional Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55
Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO NO NO
Source: CalEEMod Datasheets Appendix A
Table 4.3-2: Summary of Peak Operational Emissions
Source Emissions (lbs/day)
VOC/ROG NOX CO SOX PM10 PM2.5
Approved Project Maximum Daily
Emissions
3.03 1.25 9.92 0.02 1.58 0.43
Proposed Project Maximum Daily
Emissions
5.79 2.39 19.0 0.04 3.02 0.82
SCAQMD Regional Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55
Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO NO NO
Source: CalEEMod Datasheets Appendix A
MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024
4.4 Biological Resources
New Potentially
Significant
Impact
New Mitigation
Required Reduced Impact No New Impact
Would the project
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special‐status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
f) Conflict with the provisions of an Adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
4.4.1 Summary of MND Conclusions
4.4.A Based on the Adopted MND the Project site is within the MSHCP but not located in the Burrowing Owl Survey Area or Narrow Endemic Plant Species Survey Area (NEPSSA).
Additionally, the Project site does not occur within a Criteria Cell and/or Cell Group, Core and/or Linkage Area, Criteria Area Plant Species Survey Area (CAPSSA), Mammal Survey Area, Invertebrate/Delhi Sands Flower -Loving Fly Survey Area, or Amphibian Survey Area. However, there is the potential for nesting birds, raptors (e.g., Swainson’s hawk), and burrowing owls to be located on the project site prior to construction. As such, the proposed project would implement MM-BIO-1, which requires pre-construction surveys for burrowing owls and MM -BIO -2 which requires pre-construction surveys for nesting birds, raptors, and prior to the start of any ground disturbing activities to reduce potential impacts to these species. Therefore, with incorporation of MM-BIO-1 and MM -BIO-2 impacts to sensitive species would be less than significant.
4.4.B The Biological Report conducted for the Adopted MND concluded that the Project site does not contain any native vegetation communities, including special-status vegetation communities, or riparian habitat. Additionally, the Biological Report found that t he entire property is disturbed, with vegetated areas dominated by non -native, ruderal
MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024
species. Therefore, the proposed Project would have no impacts on special -status vegetation communities or riparian habitat.
4.4.C The Biological Report concluded that the Project site does not contain any state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.). The Project site does not contain jurisdictional waters. Therefore, the proposed Project would have no impact on state or federally protected wetlands. 6
4.4.D There are no wildlife corridors present on-site and the proposed project is not expected to impede regional wildlife movement or impact any MSHCP-designated corridors or habitat linkages. As such, the proposed project is not expected to have a substantial impact to habitat fragmentation and regional wildlife movement. The Adopted MND found that the site supports nesting opportunities for common migratory bird species therefore MM-BIO-2 which requires pre-construction surveys for nesting birds, raptors, and prior to the start of any ground disturbing activities to reduce potential impacts to these species. With implementation of MM -BIO-2 impacts would be less than significant.
4.4.E The General Biological Report indicated the presence of a single coast live oak tree on the site, the City of Jurupa Valley includes provisions for the protection and conservation of oak and other native tree and floral species within the City to protect t he natural diversity. MM-BIO-3 for dedication of Open Space Lot and Tree Maintenance and MM - BIO-4 Oak Tree Replacement are required for protection of the oak tree. With the implementation of MM-BIO-3 and MM-BIO-4 the project would be consistent with all relevant goals and policies within the City’s General Plan, the Jurupa Area Plan, and the Western Riverside County MSHCP regarding the preservation and protection of biological resources.
4.4.F The probability of MSHCP identified species to inhabit the project site is considered low due to past and existing disturbances on-site. With implementation of MM-BIO- 1 and MM-BIO-2, that would require pre-construction burrowing owl and nesting bird, raptor surveys along with the implementation of MM -BIO-3 and MM -BIO-4 for the protection of the live oak the proposed project would be clear of these species before construction and would not conflict with the MSHCP. Furthermore, PPP 4.4- 1 would require payment of mitigation fees consistent with the MSHCP and PPP
4.4-2 would require the proposed project to comply with applicable measures in the MSHCP. Therefore, impacts would be considered less than significant.
4.4.2 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
There are no unavoidable adverse impacts identified in the Adopted MND .
6 MSHCP Consistency and Biology Report: Appendix B of the Adopted MND.
MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024
4.4.3 Applicable General Plan Policies
PPP 4.4-1 The Project is required to pay mitigation fees pursuant to the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MHSCP) as required by Municipal Code Chapter 3.80.
4.4.4 Applicable Adopted MND Mitigation Measures
As described in the Adopted MND , the following mitigation measures were identified.
MM-BIO-1 Pre-Construction Burrowing Owl Survey / Burrowing Owl Protection . A 30 -day pre - construction survey for burrowing owls is required prior to future ground -disturbing activities (e.g., vegetation clearing and grubbing, tree removal, site watering, equipment staging, etc.) to ensure that no owls have colonized the site in the days or weeks preceding the ground-disturbing activities. If burrowing owls have colonized the project site prior to the initiation of ground-disturbing activities, the project proponent will immediately inform the RCA and the Wildlife Agencies and will need to coordinate in the future with the RCA and the Wildlife Agencies, including the possibility of preparing a Burrowing Owl Protection and Relocation Plan, prior to initiating ground disturbance.
If ground-disturbing activities occur, but the site is left undisturbed for more than 30 days, a pre -construction survey will again be necessary to ensure that burrowing ow l have not colonized the site since it was last disturbed. If burrowing owls are found, the same coordination described above will be necessary.
MM-BIO-2 Nesting Bird Protection . As feasible, vegetation clearing should be conducted outside of the nesting season, which is generally identified as February 1 through August 31. If avoidance of the nesting season is not feasible, then a qualified biologist shall conduct a nesting bird s urvey within three days prior to any disturbance of the site, including disking, vegetation grubbing, and grading. If active nests are identified, the biologist shall establish suitable buffers around the nests, and the bu ffer areas shall be avoided until the nests are no longer occupied and the juvenile birds can survive independently from the nests.
4.4.5 Proposed Project Impact Analysis
Development of the Proposed Project will have no new impact on biological resources.
Although BUOWs were not observed during the focused surveys, the survey area does contain suitable burrows and habitat that could become occupied by BUOW prior to implementation of the Modified Project. Therefore, Mitigation Measure MM -BIO-1 per the Adopted MND requiring a 30 -day pre - construction clearance survey would be required to reconfirm the absence of BUOWs. Biological Resources impacts would remain less than significant with the implementation of Mitigation Measures MM-BIO-1 and MM-BIO-2.
MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024
As part of the review for the proposed modified MSHCP Consistency and Biological Report (Biological Report) was completed by LSA dated January 2024 (Appendix B) and found no changes in the site or proposed Project plan that would create new significant impacts. The Biological Report found that the single live oak identified in the Adopted MND is located outside the Project site boundary and no impacts are anticipated with the Project implementation to the oak tree. Therefore, as there will be no impacts to the live oak MM-BIO-03, MM-BIO-4, and COS 1.2 are no longer applicable to the proposed Project.
Based on an examination of the analysis, findings, and conclusions of the Adopted MND , implementation of the proposed modifications would not substantially increase the severity of significant impacts previously identified, nor would new significant impacts related to biological resources that were not identified in the Adopted MND .
The Adopted MND and related implementing actions established goals and policies for development of the Project. Development of the Proposed Project will be constructed in light of the policies of the General Plan, Municipal Code, and the approved Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.
MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024
4.5 Cultural Resources
New Potentially
Significant
Impact
New Mitigation
Required Reduced Impact No New Impact
Would the project
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to §15064.5? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
c) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
4.5.1 Summary of MND Conclusions
The Approved Project’s Adopted Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) found impact related to Cultural Resources to be less than significant with mitigation incorporated. The conclusions included are from the IS/MND are discussed here.
4.5.A The EIC records search and literature review revealed 18 cultural resources recorded within one mile of the Project Site. The nearest prehistoric resource was documented approximately 1,495 meters north-northeast of the site. None of the recorded resources will be impacted by the proposed Project. In addition, research failed to identify any National Register of Historic Places properties; no California State Landmarks; no California Register of Historical Resources; nor any California Points of Historical Interest in the immediate vicinity that will be impacted as a result of the Project.
A pedestrian survey of the entire project area was conducted as part of LSA’s Cultural Resources Assessment. The survey found that the project site has been subjected to decades of orchard cultivation and surface disturbance from weed abatement disking.
Structural rubble, landscape dumping, and modern refuse were noted on the surface throughout the project site. Standing ruins of two buildings were documented on the property.
Although the structures were evaluated and determined not to meet the definition of a historic structure per CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5, the potential exists that unidentified significant historic deposits (e.g. a privy pit or intact refuse deposit dating prior to the 1920s) may be present that are related to the occupation of these structure since the 1900s and earlier. Because of this potential to encounter buried historic deposits, MM-CR-1 Archaeological Monitoring is required.
4.5.B There were no cultural resources present on the project site that qualify as an archaeological resource as defined by CEQA, and no other potential archaeological resources were encountered during the historical and archaeological surveys. However, there is still the potential to disturb a previously unidentified archeological resource on the project site that could be significant. As such, the proposed project would implement MM-CR-1 archeological monitoring, MM-CR-2 archeological treatment plan,
MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024
and MM-CR-3 final report are required and implement appropriate measures for the treatment of archeological resources if they are discovered on the project site. With implementation of these mitigation measures impacts would be less than significant.
4.5.C The project site is not currently, nor has it historically been used as a cemetery; thus, there is a low probability of encountering human remains during ground -disturbing activities.
As required by PPP 4.5-1, any unanticipated discoveries of human remains require handling in accordance with California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98, which states that in the event that human remains are discovered during construction, construction activity shall be halted, and the area shall be protected until consultation and treatment can occur as prescribed by law. With implementation of PPP 4.5-1, impacts to human remains would be less than significant.
4.5.2 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
There are no unavoidable adverse impacts identified in the Adopted MND .
4.5.3 Applicable General Plan Policies
There are no applicable General Plan Policies identified in the Adopted MND.
4.5.4 Applicable Adopted MND Mitigation Measures
As described in the Adopted MND , the following mitigation measures were identified. Red Text is added as a result of Addendum #1 to the Adopted MND.
MM-CR-1: Archaeological Monitoring: Prior to issuance of grading permits, the Permit Applicant shall provide evidence to the City of Jurupa Valley Community Development Department that a qualified professional archaeologist (Professional Archaeologist) that is listed on the City of Jurupa Valley Cultural Resources Consultant List or the Cultural Resource Consultant List maintained by the County of Riverside Planning Department, has been contracted to implement Archaeological Monitoring for the area of impact for the Project. Monitoring shall be conducted in coordination with the Consulting Tribe(s), defined as a Tribe that initiated the tribal consultation process for the Project as provided for in Public Resources Code §21080.3.1(b) (“AB52”) and has not opted out of the AB 52 consultation process, and has completed AB 52 consultation with the City.
Monitoring shall address the details of all ground -disturbing activities and provides procedures that must be followed to avoid or reduce potential impacts on cultural, archaeological, and tribal cultural resources to a level that is less than significant.
A fully executed copy of the Archaeological Monitoring Agreement shall be provided to the City of Jurupa Valley Planning Department to ensure compliance with this measure.
If the resource is significant, Mitigation Measure CR‐2 shall apply.
MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024
MM-CR-2: Archeological Treatment Plan: The Project Archaeologist shall prepare and implement a treatment plan to protect the identified archaeological resource(s) from damage and destruction. The treatment plan shall be per CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f) for historical resources and Public Resources Code § 21083.2(b) for unique archaeological resources. Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment.
If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include implement ing archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource and subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. If historic Native American tribal cultural resources are involved, the Treatment Plan shall be coordinated with the Consulting Native American Tribe(s) as described in Mitigation Measure TCR-1 through TCR-3 of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for MA21143 and Addendum #1 to the MND MA23357.
MM-CR-3: Final Report: A final report containing the significance and treatment findings shall be prepared by the Project Archaeologist and submitted to the City of Jurupa Valley Community Development Department and the Eastern Information Center, University of California, Riverside. If a historic tribal cultural resource is involved, a copy shall be provided to the Consulting Native American Tribe(s) as described in Mitigation Measure TCR-1 through 3 of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for MA21143 and Addendum #1 to the MND MA23357.
4.5.5 Proposed Project Impact Analysis
The modified Project does not propose any changes that would impact Cultural Resources than what was originally evaluated under the Approved Project Adopted MND and MMRP. However, there is still the potential to disturb a previously unidentified archeological, Tribal Cultural, and paleontological resources on the project site that could be significant. As such, the Modified Project would implement MM-CR-1 that would require archeological monitoring and MM -CR-2 that would implement appropriate measures for the treatment of archeological resources if they were discovered on the Project site, and MM-CR-3 requiring a final report would be implemented. Cultural Resource impacts would remain less than significant with the implementation of Mitigation Measures MM-CR-1 through MM-CR-3.
Based on an examination of the analysis, findings, and conclusions of the Adopted MND , implementation of the proposed modifications would not substantially increase the severity of significant impacts previously identified, nor would new significant impacts related to cultural resources that were not identified in the Adopted MND.
The Adopted MND and related implementing actions established goals and policies for development of the Project. Development of the Proposed Project will be constructed in light of the policies of the General Plan, Municipal Code, and the approved Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.
MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024
4.6 Energy
New Potentially
Significant
Impact
New Mitigation
Required Reduced Impact No New Impact
Would the project
a) Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
4.6.1 Summary of MND Conclusions
The Approved Project’s Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) found impact related to Energy to be less than significant.
4.6.A Construction Energy Analysis
Construction of the Project would require the use of fuel and electric powered equipment and vehicles for construction activities. The majority of activities would use fuel powered equipment and vehicles that would consume gasoline or diesel fuel. Heavy construction equipment (e.g., dozers, graders, backhoes, dump trucks) would be diesel powered, while smaller construction vehicles, such as pick -up trucks and personal vehicles used by workers would be gasoline powered. The majority of electricity use would be from power tools. The anticipated construction schedule assumes the Project would be built in approximately 14 months. The consumption of energy would be temporary in nature and would not represent a significant demand on available supplies. There are no unusual characteristics that would necessitate the use of fuel or electricity that would be less energy efficient than at comparable construction sites in the region or State.
Starting in 2014, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) adopted the nation's first regulation aimed at cleaning up off -road construction equipment such as bulldozers, graders, and backhoes. These requirements ensure fleets gradually turnover the oldest and dirtiest equipment to newer, cleaner models and prevent fleets from adding older, dirtier equipment. As such, the equipment used for Project construction would conform to CARB regulations and California emissions standards as fuel efficiencies gradually rise.
It should also be noted that there are no unusual Project characteristics or construction processes that would require the use of equipment that would be more energy intensive than is used for comparable activities; or equipment that would not conform to current emissions standards (and related fuel efficiencies). Equipment employed in construction of the Project would therefore not result in inefficient wasteful, or unnecessary consumption of fuel.
MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024
In addition, as required by state law 7, idling times of construction vehicles is limited to no more than five minutes, thereby minimizing, or elimi nating unnecessary and wasteful consumption of fuel due to unproductive idling of construction equipment.
Equipment employed in construction of the Project would therefore not result in inefficient wasteful, or unnecessary consumption of fuel.
Operation Energy Analysis
Energy consumption in support of or related to Project operations would include transportation energy demands and operational energy demands.
Transportation Energy Demands
Energy that would be consumed by Project‐generated traffic is a function of total vehicles miles traveled (VMT) and estimated vehicle fuel economies of vehicles accessing the Project site. The Project will result in 1,161,285 VMT and an estimated annual fuel consumption of 44,665 gallons of fuel.8
Enhanced fuel economies realized pursuant to federal and state regulatory actions, and related transition of vehicles to alternative energy sources (e.g., electricity, natural gas, biofuels, hydrogen cells) would likely decrease future gasoline fuel demands per VMT.
Location of the Project proximate to regional and local roadway systems tends to reduce VMT within the region, acting to reduce regional vehicle energy demands. As supported by the preceding discussions, Project transportation energy consumption would not be considered inefficient, wasteful, or otherwise unnecessary.
Operational Energy Demands
Occupancy of the single -family residences would result in the consumption of natural gas and electricity. Energy demands are estimated at 759,599 kBTU/year of natural gas and 179,055 kWh/year of electricity. 9 Natural gas would be supplied to the Project by SoCalGas and electricity would be supplied by SCE. The Project proposes single -family homes reflecting contemporary energy efficient/energy conserving designs and operational programs. The Project does not p ropose uses that are inherently energy intensive and the energy demands in total would be comparable to other single -family land use projects of similar scale and configuration. Lastly, the Project will comply with the applicable Title 24 standards. Compli ance itself with applicable Title 24 standards will ensure that the Project energy demands would not be inefficient, wasteful, or otherwise unnecessary.
In summary, as supported by the preceding analyses, neither construction nor operation of the Project would result in wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy, or wasteful use of energy resources.
7 California Code of Regulations Title 13, Motor Vehicles, section 2449(d)(3) Idling. 8 Appendix A, Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis. (avg 26 mpg passenger car) 9 Appendix A, Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis.
MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024
4.6.B The California Energy Commission provides oversight for the preparation of rules and regulations for the conservation of energy such as Appliance Energy Efficiency, Building Energy Efficiency, Energy Supplier Reporting, and State Energy Management. The regulations directly applicable to the Project are Building Energy Efficiency Standards, Title 24, Part 6, and CALGreen Title 24, Part 11. These regulations include but are not limited to the use of energy efficient heating and cooling systems, water conserving plumbing, and water-efficient irrigation systems. The Project is required to demonstrate compliance with these regulations as part of the building permit and inspection process.
With implementation of these measures’ impacts would be less than significant.
4.6.2 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
There are no unavoidable adverse impacts identified in the Adopted MND .
4.6.3 Applicable General Plan Policies
PPP 4.5-1 The project is required to comply with the applicable provisions of California Health and Safety Code §7050.5 as well as California Public Resources Code §5097, et. seq.
4.6.4 Applicable Adopted MND Mitigation Measures
As described in the Adopted MND , impacts related to Energy were determined to be less than significant and no mitigation measures were identified.
No substantial changes in the environment related to energy will occur with the Project modifications that would lead to more significant impacts, and no new mitigation measures are required.
4.6.5 Proposed Project Impact Analysis
To determine the potential energy impacts of the modified Project CalEEMod was run with the increase in dwelling units. The CalEEMod Datasheets are included as Appendix A to this Addendum. Data from the CalEEMod output for VMT, electricity and natural gas use was used to determine if the increases associated with the Pr oject would be wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy or conflict with state of local plans for renewable energy or energy efficiency.
Transportation Energy Demands
Energy that would be consumed by Project‐generated traffic is a function of total vehicles miles traveled (VMT) and estimated vehicle fuel economies of vehicles accessing the Project site. The Project will result in 1, 482,893 VMT and an estimated annual fuel consumption of 57,034 gallons of fuel.10
10 Appendix A, CalEEMod Datasheets. (avg 26 mpg passenger car)
MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024
Operational Energy Demands
Occupancy of the single -family residences would result in the consumption of natural gas and electricity. Energy demands are estimated at 2,382,809 kBTU/year of natural gas and 625,729 kWh/year of electricity. 11 Natural gas would be supplied to the Project by SoCalGas and electricity would be supplied by SCE. The Project proposes single-family homes reflecting contemporary energy efficient/energy conserving designs and operational programs. The Project does not p ropose uses that are inherently energy intensive and the energy demands in total would be comparable to other single -family land use projects of similar scale and configuration. Lastly, the Project will comply with the applicable Title 24 standards. Compli ance itself with applicable Title 24 standards will ensure that the Project energy demands would not be inefficient, wasteful, or otherwise unnecessary.
Based on an examination of the analysis, findings, and conclusions of the Adopted MND , although implementation of the proposed modifications would increase the energy use as compared to the approved Project, the proposed Project’s increases are directly related to the increase in housing units and would not substantially increase the severity of significant impacts previously identified, nor would new significant impacts related to energy that were not identified in the Adopted MND.
The Adopted MND and related implementing actions established goals and policies for development of the Project. Development of the Proposed Project will be constructed in light of the policies of the General Plan, Municipal Code, and the approved Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.
11 Appendix A, Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis.
MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024
4.7 Geology and Soils
New Potentially
Significant
Impact
New Mitigation
Required Reduced Impact No New Impact
Would the project
a) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving:
1) Strong seismic ground shaking? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
2) Seismic‐related ground failure, including liquefaction? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ 3) Landslides? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and
potentially result in on‐ or off‐site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18‐1‐B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating direct or indirect substantial risks to life or property?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
4.7.1 Summary of MND Conclusions
4.7.A To minimize potential damage to the proposed project structures caused by seismic hazards, all construction would comply with the latest CBC standards as required by PPP
4.7-1. Implementation of the CBC standards, including provisions for seismic building designs, would further reduce impacts associated with seismic ground shaking and seismic-related ground failure. Therefore, impacts from the exposure of people or property to potential substantial adverse effects from earthquake, seismic ground shaking, as well as seismic -related ground failure, or landslides would be less than significant.
4.7.B A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan would be prepared before construction begins, and a Water Quality Management Plan is required to address post- construction soil erosion. These plans would be used to identify best management practices (e.g., bioretention basins/flow-through planters, landscape design, silt screening, fiber filtration rolls) to minimize off-site sediment transport and erosion for the duration of the proposed project.
Incorporation of Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan best management practices would implement methods to direct and detain stormwater on the project site and
MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024
reduce loss of topsoil via stormwater runoff. Implementation of these measures would reduce soil erosion and the loss of topsoil during construction and operation of the proposed project would be less than significant.
4.7.C The Geotechnical Evaluation indicates that the soil deposits underlying the property are not susceptible to liquefaction. As a mandatory condition of Project approval, the Project would be required to conduct site preparation and grading as well as construct the proposed structures in accordance with the approved recommendations included in the Geotechnical Evaluation prepared for the Project. These measures in addition to implementation of current CBC standards, including provisions for seismic building designs, would ensure that proposed project impacts associated with liquefaction and lateral spreading would be less than significant.
4.7.D The Geotechnical Report indicated that on-site earth materials exhibit a low expansion potential as classified in accordance with CBC Section 1803.5. Project adherence to expansive soil recommendations outlined within the Geotechnical Report as well as PPP 4.7-1 that requires compliance with standards and requirements contained in the CBC for the design of the proposed buildings, would ensure that impacts related to expansive soil would be less than significant.
4.7.E The proposed project would not include use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems. Wastewater treatment and collection services would be provided to the project site by the Jurupa Community Services District. Therefore, no impacts related to this issue would occur.
4.7.F General Plan Figure 4 -18- Paleontological Sensitivity, indicates that the site has a high sensitivity (Ha) designation for finding paleontological resources12 therefore mitigation measures MM-GEO-1 for paleontological monitoring and MM-GEO-2 for paleontological treatment plan are required.
4.7.2 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
There are no unavoidable adverse impacts identified in the Adopted MND .
4.7.3 Applicable General Plan Policies
PPP 4.7-1 As required by Municipal Code Section 8.05.010, the Project shall comply with the most recent edition of the California Building Code which requires the Project to comply with the approved recommended seismic design requirements contained in the Geotechnical Evaluation, EEI Engineering Solutions and be incorporated in the construction of each structure, to preclude significant adverse effects associated with seismic hazards.
12 City of Jurupa Valley, General Plan, Conservation and Open Space Element, Figure 4-18, Paleontological Sensitivity.
MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024
4.7.4 Applicable Adopted MND Mitigation Measures
MM-GEO-1 Paleontological Monitoring. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, a qualified paleontologist shall be retained to observe ground -disturbing activities and recover fossil resources as necessary when construction activities will impact the older Quaternary Alluvium. The Paleontologist will attend the pre -grade conference and establish procedures and protocols for paleontological monitoring and to temporarily halt ground -disturbing activi ties to permit sampling, evaluation, and recovery of any discovery. Substantial excavations below the uppermost layers (more than 3 feet below surface) should be monitored. Sediment samples should be recovered to determine the small-fossil potential of the site. If a discovery is determined to be significant, additional excavations and salvage of the fossil may be necessary to ensure that any impacts to it are mitigated to a less than significant level.
MM-GEO-2 Paleontological Treatment Plan . Prior to the issuance of grading permits, a qualified paleontologist shall be retained to observe ground -disturbing activities and recover fossil resources as necessary when construction activities will impact the older Quaternary Alluvium. The Paleontologist will attend the pre -grade conference and establish procedures and protocols for paleontological monitoring and to temporarily halt ground -disturbing activities to permit sampling, evaluation, and recovery of any discovery. Substantial excavations below the uppermost layers (more than 3 feet below surface) should be monitored. Sediment samples should be recovered to determine the small-fossil potential of the site. If a discovery is determined to be significant, additional excavations and salvage of the fossil ma y be necessary to ensure that any impacts to it are mitigated to a less than significant level.
4.7.5 Proposed Project Impact Analysis
The Project site remains in the same physical condition as it did in 2022 when the MND for the Approved Project was adopted. The Modified Project does not propose any changes that would impact Geology and Soils than what was originally evaluated under the Approved Project and compliance with MM-GEO-1, MM-GEO-2, and PPP 4.7-1 are required.
Based on an examination of the analysis, findings, and conclusions of the Adopted MND , implementation of the proposed modifications would not substantially increase the severity of significant impacts previously identified, nor would new significant impacts related to geology and soils that were not identified in the Adopted MND .
The Adopted MND and related implementing actions established goals and policies for development of the Project. Development of the Proposed Project will be constructed in light of the policies of the General Plan, Municipal Code, and the approved Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.
MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024
4.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions
New Potentially
Significant
Impact
New Mitigation
Required Reduced Impact No New Impact
Would the project
a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the
environment?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation Adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
4.8.1 Summary of MND Conclusions
4.8.A The net GHG emissions associated with buildout of the proposed project with PPPs and PDFs would not exceed the City’s screening threshold of 3,000 MT CO 2e per year.
Therefore, the proposed project would have a less than significant impact from GHG emissions.
4.8.B The proposed project would not actively interfere or conflict with any future City - mandated, state -mandated, or federally mandated retrofit obligations enacted or promulgated to legally require residential development city-wide, state-wide, or nation- wide to assist in meeting state -Adopted GHG emissions reduction targets. Therefore, the proposed project’s impacts on GHG would be less than significant and the proposed project would not conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation Adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions.
4.8.2 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
There are no unavoidable adverse impacts identified in the Adopted MND .
4.8.3 Applicable General Plan Policies
PPP 4.8-1 Prior to issuance of the first residential building permit, the Project Applicant shall submit energy usage calculations in the form of a Title 24 Compliance Report to the City of Jurupa Valley Building & Safety Department showing that the Project will be constructed in compliance with the most recently Adopted edition of the applicable California Building Code Title 24 requirements.
PPP 4.8-2 As required by Municipal Code Section 9.283.010, Water Efficient Landscape Design Requirements, prior to the approval of landscaping plans, the Project proponent shall prepare and submit landscape plans that demonstrate compliance with this section.
MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024