Agenda, regular meeting — Jurupa Valley City Council, February 6, 2025 (part 3 of 3)

4.11 Land Use and Planning

New Potentially
Significant
Impact
New Mitigation
Required Reduced Impact No New Impact
Would the project
a) Physically divide an established community? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
b) Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation Adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒

4.11.1 Summary of MND Conclusions

4.11.A The Project is in an area largely characterized by residential development and school use. The Project site is bordered by Jurupa Road to the north, Camino Real to the east, Kirby Drive to the west, and Camino Real Elementary School to the south. As such, the Project will not divide an established community.

4.11.B A General Plan Amendment (GPA) is being proposed to change the designation of this property to Medium Density Residential (MDR) which would allow for development of single-family uses at a density of up to 5 dwelling units per acre. A corresponding change of zone (CZ) is also proposed to reclassify the site as Planned Development (R -4). The proposed Project would implement these new designations through a development plan that consists of 35 lots for single -family detached housing on 6.92 acres (5 units/acre) as shown in the proposed site plan (see previous Figure 3.2, Conceptual Site Plan).

Acceptance of the land use designation change, the proposed project would otherwise not conflict with any applicable goals, objectives, or policies of the City of Jurupa Valley General Plan, the Jurupa Valley Area Plan, or the City of Jurupa Valley Zoning Ordinance.

Additionally, the proposed project would not conflict with any applicable policy documents, including the Western Riverside County MSHCP (see Section 4.4 (f), Biological Resources), SCAQMD’s Air Quality Management Plan (see Section 4. 3, Air Quality), and implementation of SCAG’s 20 20–2045 RTP/SCS (see Section 4. 8(b), Greenhouse Gas Emissions). Furthermore, Section 4. 8, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, demonstrates that the proposed project’s GHG emissions would be below SCAQMD and the City thresholds. Therefore, the proposed project would not conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation Adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating adverse environmental effects. Impacts would be less than significant.

4.11.2 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts

There are no unavoidable adverse impacts identified in the Adopted MND .

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 39 ends

4.11.3 Applicable General Plan Policies

There are no General Plan Policies identified in the Adopted MND.

4.11.4 Applicable Adopted MND Mitigation Measures

As described in the Adopted MND , impacts related to land use and planning were determined to be less than significant and no mitigation measures were identified.

No substantial changes in the environment related to land use and planning will occur with the Project modifications that would lead to more significant impacts, and no new mitigation measures are required.

4.11.5 Proposed Project Impact Analysis

The proposed Project changes to the approved TTM does not result in conflicts with any land use plan, policy, or regulation Adopted to avoid or mitigate an environmental effect, including, but not limited to City of Jurupa General Plan, City of Jurupa Valley Zoning, Western Riverside County MSHCP, SCAQMD Air Quality, Management Plan, and SCAG’s 2020–2045 RTP/SCS and the Santa Ana River Basin Plan.

The Adopted MND and related implementing actions established goals and policies for development of the Project. Development of the Proposed Project will be constructed in light of the policies of the General Plan, Municipal Code, and the approved Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 40 ends

4.12 Mineral Resources

New Potentially
Significant
Impact
New Mitigation
Required Reduced Impact No New Impact
Would the project
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒

4.12.1 Summary of MND Conclusions

4.12.A According to the General Plan32 the Project site is located within Mineral Resource Zone (MRZ) 3, which is defined as “Areas containing known or inferred mineral occurrences of undetermined mineral resources significance.” However, no mineral resource extraction activity is known to have ever occurred on the Project site. Accordingly, implementation of the Project would not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value t o the region or the residents of the State of California.

4.12.B The General Plan Open Space, Mineral Resources (OS -MIN) land use designation is intended for mineral extraction and processing and includes areas held in reserve for future mineral extraction and processing. 16 The Project site is delineated as Country Neighborhood (LDR). Therefore, the Project is not delineated on the General Plan, a specific plan, or other land use plan as a locally important mineral resource recovery site.

4.12.2 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts

There are no unavoidable adverse impacts identified in the Adopted MND .

4.12.3. Applicable General Plan Policies

There were no General Plan Policies identified in the Approved Project Adopted MND .

4.12.4 Applicable Adopted MND Mitigation Measures

As described in the Adopted MND , impacts related to mineral resources were determined to be less than significant and no mitigation measures were identified.

16 City of Jurupa Valley, General Plan Land Use Element, p.2-28.

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 41 ends

No substantial changes in the environment related to mineral resources will occur with the Project modifications that would lead to more significant impacts, and no new mitigation measures are required.

4.12.5 Proposed Project Impact Analysis

The area impacted by the proposed Project does not change the boundaries of the site reviewed in the adopted MND and does not contain known or locally essential mineral resources and is not designated by the General Plan as a mineral resource recovery site. Based on an examination of the analysis, findings, and conclusions of the ADOPTED MND , implementation of the proposed modifications would not substantially increase the severity of significant impacts previously identified, nor would new significant impacts related to mineral resources that were not identified in the Adopted MND .

The ADOPTED MND and related implementing actions established goals and policies for development of the Project. Development of the Proposed Project will be constructed in light of the policies of the General Plan, Municipal Code, and the approved Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.

4.13 Noise

New Potentially
Significant
Impact
New Mitigation
Required Reduced Impact No New Impact
Would the project result in:
a) Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project more than standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
b) Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or
groundborne noise levels? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been Adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒

4.13.1 Summary of MND Conclusions

4.13.A With implementation of Mitigation Measures (MM) NOI -1, the Project’s noise impacts will not result in the generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project more than standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies.

4.13.B The closest structure to the Project property line is minimally 100 feet from the property line at the Camino Real School to the south. The estimated construction vibration level from a large bulldozer (worst case scenario) measured at 25 -feet would create a vibration level of 0.089 in/sec and 0.011 at the closet structure, which does not exceed the 0.2 in/sec threshold. Therefore, construction impacts related to groundborne vibration is considered less than significant.

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 42 ends

The proposed Project is for residential uses which do not create significant groundborne vibration impacts. Therefore, operation of the proposed project would not result in exposure of residents to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels, and impacts would be less than significant.

4.13.C The Project consists of single-family residences and will not expose people to excessive aircraft noise. The nearest airports are Flabob Airport, Riverside Municipal Airport, and Ontario International Airport which are 2.3 mi southeast, 3.4 mi south, and 8 .4 mi northwest of the project site, respectively. The future airport noise contours for Flabob Airport and Riverside Municipal Airport based on the Riverside County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission 2004) shows that the project site is outside the 55 dBA CNEL noise contour. Also, the airport noise contour for Ontario International Airport based on the Compatibility Policy Map: Noise Impact Zones from the LA/Ontario International Airport Land Use Compat ibility Plan (City of Ontario 2011) shows that the project site is outside the 60 to 65 dBA CNEL noise contour.

Therefore, the project would not expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels from aircraft operations. Standard building design and construction methods would provide adequate noise attenuation to comply with the indoor noise standard of 45 CNEL and thereby not expose residents of the Project to excessive noise levels.

The project site is not located within the vicinity of any private airstrip. Therefore, the proposed project would not expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels, and no impact would occur.

4.13.2. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts

There are no unavoidable adverse impacts identified in the Adopted MND.

4.13.3 Applicable General Plan Policies

PPP 4.13-1 As required by General Plan Policy NE 3.5, the Project contractors are required to limit commercial construction activities adjacent to or within 200 feet of residential uses to weekdays, between 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m., and limit high -noise-generating construction activities (e.g., grading, demolition, pile driving) near sensitive receptors to weekdays between 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. A note shall be placed on the grading plan(s) noting this requirement.

4.13.4 Applicable Adopted MND Mitigation Measures

As described in the Adopted MND , the following mitigation measure was identified.

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 43 ends

MM-NOI-1 Construction Noise Mitigation. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the following notes be included on grading plans and building plans. Project contractors shall be required to ensure compliance with the notes and permit periodic inspection of the construction site by City of Jurupa Valley staff or its designee to confirm compliance.

These notes also shall be specified in bid documents issued to prospective construction contractors.
“a) Haul truck deliveries shall be limited to between the hours of 6:00am to 6:00pm during the months of June through September and 7:00am to 6:00pm during the months of October through May.
b) Construction contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers, consistent with manufacturers’ standards.
c) All stationary construction equipment shall be placed in such a manner so that emitted noise is directed away from any sensitive receptors adjacent to the Project site.
d) Construction equipment staging areas shall be located the greatest distance between the staging area and the nearest sensitive receptors.”

No substantial changes in the environment related to noise impacts will occur with the Project modifications that would lead to more significant impacts, and no new mitigation measures are required.

4.13.5 Proposed Project Impact Analysis

The Adopted MND identified potential noise impacts due to project construction, traffic, and rail operations. The Project does not propose any changes to the intensity or type of development than what was originally allowed under the Approved Project. Mitigation Measure MM NOI -1 will be imposed on the Proposed Project.

As part of the proposed Project review a Technical Noise Memorandum from LSA dated February 5, 2024 (Appendix F) concluded: that impacts associated with construction noise, construction vibration, aircraft operations, stationary HVAC operations, and off -site vibration would remain the same as the previous analysis. Additionally, the updated off-site traffic noise impact analysis indicated that noise level increase would remain less 1 dBA CNEL and would continue to be less than significant. The proposed project does not result in any new noise or vibration impacts.

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 44 ends

4.14 Population and Housing

New Potentially
Significant
Impact
New Mitigation
Required Reduced Impact No New Impact
Would the project
a) Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing
elsewhere?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒

4.14.1 Summary of MND Conclusions

4.14.A The Project site is located in a developed area of the City and is served by existing water and sewer facilities, gas and electric utilities, and improved roadways. No additional infrastructure will be needed to serve the Project other than connection to infrastructure adjacent to the site.

Based on the California Department of Finance, E-5 Population and Housing Estimates for Cities, Counties, and the State, 2020-2022, the City’s population as of January 1, 2022 is 107,083 with a ratio of persons per household of 3.75. 17 Based on the number of dwelling units times 3.75 persons per dwelling unit, the proposed Project would increase the City’s population by approximately 131 persons assuming all residents came from outside the City. (3.75 persons/du with 35 units). An incre ase of 131 in relation to the current population of 105,384 represents an increase of 0.13 % and would not induce substantial population growth.

4.14.B The Project site consists of undeveloped land. Therefore, implementation of the Project would not displace people or a substantial number of existing housing, nor would it necessitate the construction of replacement housing elsewhere.

4.14.2 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts

There are no unavoidable adverse impacts identified in the Adopted MND.

4.14.3 Applicable General Plan Policies

There were no General Plan Policies identified in the Approved Project Adopted MND.

17 https://dof.ca.gov/forecasting/demographics/estimates/e -5-population-and-housing-estimates-for-cities- counties-and-the-state-2020-2023/

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 45 ends

4.14.4 Applicable Adopted MND Mitigation Measures

As described in the Adopted MND, impacts related to population and housing were determined to be less than significant and no mitigation measures were identified.

No substantial changes in the environment related to population and housing will occur with the Project modifications that would lead to more significant impacts, and no new mitigation measures are required.

4.14.5 Proposed Project Impact Analysis

Based on the California Department of Finance, E-5 Population and Housing Estimates for Cities, Counties, and the State, 2021-2023, the City’s population as of January 1, 2023 is 104,983 with a ratio of persons per household of 3. 66.18 Based on the number of dwelling units times 3. 66 persons per dwelling unit, the proposed Project would increase the City’s population by approximately 245 persons assuming all residents came from outside the City. (3.66 persons/du with 67 units). An increase of 245 in relation to the current population of 104,983 represents an increase of 0.23 % and would not induce substantial population growth.

18 https://dof.ca.gov/forecasting/demographics/estimates/e -5-population-and-housing-estimates-for-cities- counties-and-the-state-2020-2023/

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 46 ends

4.15 Public Services

New Potentially
Significant
Impact
New Mitigation
Required Reduced Impact No New Impact
Would the project
a) Result in substantial adverse physical impacts
associated with the provision of new or physically
altered governmental facilities, need for new or
physically altered governmental facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant
environmental impacts, in order to maintain
acceptable service ratios, response times or other
performance objectives for any of the public services:

1) Fire protection? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
2) Police protection? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
3) Schools? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
4) Parks? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
5) Other public facilities? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒

4.15.1 Summary of MND Conclusions

4.15.A1 Fire Service:

The Riverside County Fire Department provides fire protection services to the Project area. The Project would be primarily served by the Riverside County West Riverside Fire Station No. 18 located approximately 0.5 roadway miles north of the Project site at 7545 Mission Boulevard, Jurupa Valley, CA.

Development of the Project would impact fire protection services by placing an additional demand on existing fire protection resources should its resources not be augmented. To offset the increased demand for fire protection services, the Project would be conditioned by the City to provide a minimum of fire safety and support fire suppression activities, including compliance with State and local fire codes, fire sprinklers, a fire hydrant system, paved access, and secondary access routes.

In addition, as required by the City’s Inter -Agency Project Review Request process, the Project plans were routed to the Fire Department for review and comment on the impacts to providing fire protection services. The Fire Department did not indicate that the Project would result in the need for new or physically altered fire facilities in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives.

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 47 ends

Furthermore, the Municipal Code requires payment of the Development Impact Fee to assist the City in providing for fire protection services. 19 Payment of the Development Impact Fee would ensure that the Project provides fair share funds for the provision of additional public services, including fire protection services, which may be applied to fire facilities and/or equipment, to offset the incr emental increase in the demand for fire protection services that would be created by the Project.

Based on the above analysis, with implementation of PPP 4.14 -1 and PPP 4.14 -2, impacts related to fire protection are less than significant.

4.15.Aii Police Protection:

The Riverside County Sheriff’s Department provides community policing to the Project area via the Jurupa Valley Station located at 7477 Mission Boulevard, Jurupa Valley, CA.

The Project would increase the demand for police protection services. The Municipal Code requires payment of the Development Impact Fee to assist the City in providing for public services, including police protection services 20. Payment of the Development Impact Fee would ensure that the Project provides its fair share of funds for additional police protection services, which may be applied to sheriff facilities and/or equipment, to offset the incremental increase in the demand that would be created by the Project.

In addition, as required by the City’s Inter -Agency Project Review Request process, the Project plans were routed to the Sheriff’s Department for review and comment on the impacts to providing police protection services. The Sheriff’s Department did not indicate that the Project would result in the need for new or physically altered sheriff facilities in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives.

Based on the above analysis, with implementation of PPP 4.15-2, impacts related to police protection are less than significant.

4.15.Aiii Schools:

The proposed project would be required to contribute fees to the School District through the implementation of PPP 4.14 -3. Pursuant to Senate Bill 50, payment of school impact fees constitutes complete mitigation for project-related impacts to school services. Therefore, mandatory payment of school impact fees would reduce the proposed project’s impacts to school facilities to a less -than-significant level, and no mitigation would be required.

4.15.Aiv Parks:

Although the proposed project incorporates recreation and park space for future residents, it would comply with PPP 4.14 -4 that requires the proposed project to

19 City of Jurupa Valley, Municipal Code Chapter 3.75, Development Impact Fee, June 10, 2020. Available at:
https://www.jurupavalley.org/168/Municipal-Code
20 Ibid.

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 48 ends

contribute applicable impact fees per single-family and multi-family residential units to JARPD in accordance with JARPD Park Development Fees (Assembly Bill 1600). Pursuant to Assembly Bill 1600, payments of park impact fees constitute mitigation for project - related impacts to park facilities and services. The refore, mandatory payment of park impact fees would reduce the proposed project’s impacts to parks and recreation facilities to a less-than-significant level, and no mitigation would be required.

4.15.Av Other Public Services:

Pursuant to PPP 4.14 -2 the proposed project would be required to comply with the provisions of the City’s DIF Ordinance, which requires a fee payment to assist the City in providing public services. Payment of the DIF fee would ensure that the proposed project provides fair share of funds for additional public services. These funds may be applied to the acquisition and/or construction of public facilities and/or equipment, including library books and other resources. Mandatory payment of DIF fees would ensure that project-related impacts to library services would be less than significant.

4.15.2 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts

There are no unavoidable adverse impacts identified in the Adopted MND.

4.15.3 Applicable General Plan Policies

PPP 4.15-1 The Project applicant shall comply with all applicable Riverside County Fire Department codes, ordinances, and standard conditions regarding fire prevention and suppression measures relating to water improvement plans, fire hydrants, automatic fire extinguishing systems, fire a ccess, access gates, combustible construction, water availability, and fire sprinkler systems.

PPP 4.15-2 As required by Municipal Code Chapter 3.75, the Project is required to pay a Development Impact Fee that the City can use to improve public facilities and/or, to offset the incremental increase in the demand for public services that would be created by the Project.

PPP 4.15-3 Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the Project Applicant shall pay required development impact fees to the Jurupa Unified School District following protocol for impact fee collection.

PPP 4.15-4 Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the Project Applicant shall pay required park development impact fees to the Jurupa Area Recreation and Park District pursuant to District Ordinance No. 01-2007 and 02-2008.

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 49 ends

4.15.4. Applicable Adopted MND Mitigation Measures

As described in the Adopted MND , impacts related to public services were determined to be less than significant and no mitigation measures were identified.

No substantial changes in the environment related to public services will occur with the Project modifications that would lead to more significant impacts, and no new mitigation measures are required.

4.15.5 Proposed Project Impact Analysis

As noted in the response to Issue 4.14(a), Population and Housing, of this Initial Study, development of the Project would add approximately 245 persons to the population of the City assuming that all new residents come from outside the City limits. This low number of persons in relation to the current population of 104,983 would not significantly increase the demand for public services, including fire, police, public health services, parks, and library services which would require the construction of new or expanded public facilities.

The Municipal Code requires payment of the Development Impact Fee to assist the City in providing for public services. Payment of the Development Impact Fee would ensure that the Project provides fair share of funds for additional public services. These funds may be applied to the acquisition and/or construction of public facilities.21
Based on an examination of the analysis, findings, and conclusions of the Adopted MND , implementation of the proposed modifications would not substantially increase the severity of significant impacts previously identified, nor would new significant impacts related to public services that were not identified in the Adopted MND .

21 Ibid.

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 50 ends

4.16 Recreation

New Potentially
Significant
Impact
New Mitigation
Required Reduced Impact No New Impact
Would the project
a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒

4.16.1 Summary of MND Conclusions

4.16.A Pursuant to PPP 4. 16-1 the proposed project would be required to pay park development impact fees to the Jurupa Area Recreation and Park District that would help maintain and provide park services for the new residents as a result of the proposed project. Therefore, the amount of available parkland and planned parkland included as part of the proposed project would be su fficient for the population increase caused by the proposed project without resulting in deterioration of facilities. Impacts would be less than significant.

4.16.B Potential environmental impacts that result from the recreational facilities included as part of the proposed project would be minimized or avoided to the extent feasible through the implementation of plans, policies, and programs, project design features .

As noted in the response to issue 4.14 (a) Population and Housing the low number of persons potentially added to the population in relation to the City population of 107,083 would not require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse effect on the environment. In addition, no offsite parks or recreational improvements are proposed or required as part of the Project . Therefore, impacts resulting from the adverse physical effects on the environment of the proposed project’s recreational facilities would be less than significant.

4.16.2. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts

There are no unavoidable adverse impacts identified in the Adopted MND .

4.16.3. Applicable General Plan Policies

PPP 4.16-1 Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the Project Applicant shall pay required park development impact fees to the Jurupa Area Recreation and Park District pursuant to District Ordinance No. 01-2007 and 02-2008.

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 51 ends

4.16.4 Applicable Adopted MND Mitigation Measures

As described in the Adopted MND , impacts related to recreation were determined to be less than significant and no mitigation measures were identified.

No substantial changes in the environment related to recreation will occur with the Project modifications that would lead to more significant impacts, and no new mitigation measures are required.

4.16.5 Proposed Project Impact Analysis

The additional units in the proposed Project would potentially increase the population form the approved project by 114 persons. The assessment in the adopted MND was based on an estimated City population of 107,083, whereas the estimated current population is 104,983 this reduction in population would therefore reduce the potential impact on recreation resources. Based on an examination of the analysis, findings, and conclusions of the Adopted MND , implementation of the proposed modifications would not substantially increase the severity of significant impacts previously identified, nor would new significant impacts related to recreation that were not identified in the Adopted MND .

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 52 ends

4.17 Traffic and Circulation

New Potentially
Significant
Impact
New Mitigation
Required Reduced Impact No New Impact
Would the project
a) Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
b) Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines § 15064.3, subdivision (b)? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
d) Result in inadequate emergency access? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒

4.17.1 Summary of MND Conclusions

4.17.A The City is served by transit service by the Riverside Transit Agency (RTA), the closest route to the Project site is Route 49 on Mission Boulevard approximately .44 miles north along Camino real and .75 miles northeast along Jurupa Road.

The Project is not proposing any improvements that would interfere with current transit service or bicycle travel. In addition, the Project will provide adequate pedestrian facilities, including upgrading the existing sidewalks along public streets abuttin g the site, as necessary.

4.17.B VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED (VMT) ANALYSIS
Table 4.17 -1 summarizes the base year citywide average/significant threshold and project VMT per capita. The Project VMT/Capita was estimated utilizing RIVCOM model runs consistent with the methodology recommended in the City’s TIA Guidelines.

Table 4.17-1 Base Year City and Project VMT Summary
City* Project Difference Percentage Difference Significant Impact

21.9 28.1 6.2 28.31 % Yes
Source: Trip Generation and Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis (Adopted MND Appendix I)

Project Significant VMT Impact
As shown above, the proposed Project Average VMT/Capita is 28.31 % above the City average base year VMT/Capita and based on the criteria outlined in this report, the proposed Project exceeds the existing City of Jurupa Valley VMT/Capita and thus has a significant transportation impact.

Cumulative Significant VMT Impact
According to the City of Jurupa Valley Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines (dated August 2020), if a project is consistent with the Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 53 ends

Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS), then the cumulative impacts shall be considered less than significant. Because the proposed Project is not consistent with the RTP/SCS, the cumulative impacts are considered to be significant and, hence, a cumulative analysi s was required and conducted.

Table 4.17 -2 summarizes the citywide average/ significant threshold and the project VMT per capita for the cumulative year.

Table 4.17-2 Cumulative Year City and Project VMT Summary City* Project Difference Percentage Difference Significant Impact

22.5 27.8 5.3 23.55 % Yes
Source: Trip Generation and Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis (Adopted MND Appendix I)

As shown above, the proposed Project Average VMT/Capita for the cumulative year is

23.55 % above the City average VMT/Capita for the cumulative year, resulting in a significant impact.

4.17.C Access to the site is already in place from the roadways abutting the Project site. The Project is proposing the following street improvements that will meet City standards.

Camino Real improvement recommendations include:
• North Bound: One 12 -foot-wide left turn lane, one 12 -foot wide through lane, one 13-foot through lane/right turn lane, and 8-foot shoulder (shoulder not required at intersection with Jurupa Road).
• South Bound: One 13 -foot wide through lane, one 12 -foot wide through lane, and 8-foot shoulder (shoulder not required at intersection with Jurupa Road). • 6-foot-wide raised median for future UPRR gate assembly. • 18-foot-wide west parkway.

In addition, the Project is a located in an area developed with residential and school uses, and as such, would not be incompatible with existing development in the surrounding area to the extent that it would create a transportation hazard because of an incompatible use.

4.17.D The project site plan has been reviewed by the City’s Engineering Department, and CALFIRE to ensure that adequate access to and from the project site would be provided for emergency vehicles. For the reasons stated, it is determined that implementation of the proposed project would have a less than significant impact on emergency access.

4.17.2 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts

There are no unavoidable adverse impacts identified in the Adopted MND.

Table 4.17-3 shows the resulting reductions after application of MM VMT-1, MM-VMT-2 and VMT-3 through VMT-5.

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 54 ends

Table 4.17-3 VMT Reduction:

Mitigation CAPCOA Reference VMT Reduction/VMT
VMT- 1 – Electric Vehicle Charging Stations T-14 3.9 %
VMT-2 – Sidewalks and Pedestrian
Improvements
T-18 0.16 %
Project Design Features
VMT-3 – High Destination Accessibility T-31A 1.0 %
VMT-4 – Traffic Calming & Safety Measures T-35 17.5 %
VMT-5 – Improve Transit (Bus Shelter) T-46 1.0 %
Total VMT Mitigation Reduction 23.56 %
Unmitigated VMT 27.8
Mitigated VMT 21.25
Threshold 22.5
Source: Trip Generation and Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis (Approved MND Appendix I)

With implementation of the recommended mitigation measures, strategies, and Project Design Features, the project VMT is anticipated to decrease to 21.25 miles per capita, which is below the cumulative year City’s threshold of 22.5. Therefore, the project’s impa cts under CEQA for traffic and transportation will be less than significant after mitigation.

4.17.3 Applicable General Plan Policies

There are no General Plan Policies identified in the Adopted MND .

4.17.4 Applicable Adopted MND Mitigation Measures

As described in the analysis below in 4.17.5 Proposed Project Impact Analysis the Adopted MND’ Mitigation Measures for Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMTO are no longer applicable.

4.17.5 Proposed Project Impact Analysis

The proposed Project does not make changes that would create new or more significant impacts for Thresholds 4.17(a), 4.17(c), or 4.17(d)

The Adopted MND determined that the Approved Project would result in significant and unavoidable impacts due to exceeding the VMT thresholds discussed under 4.17(b).

As part of the review of the proposed Project a Trip Generation and Vehicle Miles Traveled Analysis was conducted by LSA (Appendix G). The VMT per capita for the project is 14.5, which is 6.59% less than the City’s threshold. Therefore, since the project is located within a low VMT zone, it is estimated that the project will not have no significant VMT impact and is eligible to be screened out from further VMT Analysis.

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 55 ends

Similar to the baseline scenario, the VMT Tool was run for the cumulative scenario to determine the project VMT per capita in the cumulative scenario the results of this analysis the project is estimated to generate 15.6 VMT per Capita, which is 4.17 percent less than the threshold of 16.3. Therefore, it is estimated that the project will not have any cumulative significant VMT impact and is eligible to be screened out from further VMT Analysis.

Based on an examination of the analysis, findings, and conclusions of the Adopted MND , implementation of the proposed modifications would not substantially increase the severity of significant impacts previously identified, nor would new significant impacts related to transportation that were not identified in the Adopted MND. The amended Project would result in a decrease in impacts related to VMT and as such the VMT Mitigation Measures MM -VMT-1 and MM -VMT-2, and Project Design Features VMT-3, VMT-4, and VMT-5 are not required and are therefore removed form the proposed Project’s MMRP and Conditions of Approval.

The Adopted MND and related implementing actions established goals and policies for development of the Project. Development of the Proposed Project will be constructed in light of the policies of the General Plan, Municipal Code, and the approved Conditions of Approval a nd the Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. Project Transportation impacts would be less than significant.

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 56 ends

4.18 Tribal Cultural Resources

New Potentially
Significant
Impact
New Mitigation
Required Reduced Impact No New Impact
Threshold 4.18 (a) Would the project cause a
substantial adverse change in the significance of a
tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources
Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place,
cultural landscape that is geographically defined in
terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred
place, or object with cultural value to a California
Native American tribe, and that is:

a) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of
historical resources as defined in Public Resources
Code section 5020.1(k)?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
Threshold 4.18 (b) Would the project cause a
substantial adverse change in the significance of a
tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources
Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place,
cultural landscape that is geographically defined in
terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred
place, or object with cultural value to a California
Native American tribe, and that is:

b) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒

4.18.1 Summary of MND Conclusions

4.18.A A record search was conducted at the University of California, Riverside, Eastern Information Center, Riverside, for the Project site. This search included a review of all recorded historic and prehistoric archaeological sites within a one -mile radius of t he Project site. In addition, the California Points of Historical Interest (PHI), the listing of California Historical Landmarks (CHL), the California Register of Historic Resources Inventory (HRI) were checked. Historic maps were also reviewed.

The California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) Eastern Information Center (EIC) indicated that 38 surveys were completed within a one -mile radius of the project site. The EIC records search and literature review revealed 18 cultural resources recorded within one mile of the Project Site. None of the other recorded resources will be impacted by the proposed Project.

The remnants of the structures (residence and shed/bunkhouse) were damaged in a recent fire and as found in the Cultural Resources Assessment While uncommon, the buildings’ methods of construction (adobe with mud-sill floors, various siding materials

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 57 ends

and composition roofing) are not unique and there is no surface indication of associated subsurface deposits. Implementation of Mitigation Measures CR-1 through CR -3 will ensure impacts remain less than significant. Mitigation Measures TCR-1 through TCR-3 will address if any historic cultural resources are also historic tribal cultural resources.

In addition, research failed to identify any National Register of Historic Places properties; no California State Landmarks; no California Register of Historical Resources; nor any California Points of Historical Interest in the immediate vicinity of the Project site.

4.18.B The Planning Department notified the following California Native American Tribes per the requirements of AB52:

• Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation
• Soboba Band Luiseño Indians
• San Manuel Band of Mission Indians
• Torres Martinez Band of Cahuilla Indians.
• Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians

As a result of the SB-18 and AB-52 consultation process, mitigation measures TCR-1 through TCR-3 are required.

4.18.2 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts

There are no unavoidable adverse impacts identified in the Adopted MND .

4.18.3 Applicable General Plan Policies

There were no GP Policies identified in the Approved Project Adopted MND .

4.18.4 Applicable Adopted MND Mitigation Measures

As described in the Adopted MND , the following mitigation measure s were identified. Red Text is added as a result of Addendum #1 to the Adopted MND.

MM- TCR-1 Native American Monitoring Agreement. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Permit Applicant shall enter into a Monitoring Agreement with the Consulting Tribe(s) for Native American Monitor(s) to be onsite during ground disturbing activities allowed by the grading permit. A Consultin g Tribe is defined as a tribe that initiated the AB 52 tribal consultation process for the Project, has not opted out of the AB 52 consultation process, and has completed AB 52 consultation with the City as provided for in Public Resources Code §21080.3.1( b). Ground disturbing activities and include excavation of each portion of the project site including clearing, grubbing, tree removals, grading and trenching.

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 58 ends

The Monitoring Agreement shall include, but is not limited to, the following provisions:
a) Provide a minimum of 30 days advance notice to the Consulting Tribe(s) of all ground disturbing activities.
b) In conjunction with the Archaeological Monitor(s) required by Mitigation Measure CR -1 under Section 4.5, Cultural Resources, of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for MA21347 and Addendum #1 to the MND MA23357, the Native American Monitor(s) shall have the authority to temporarily divert, redirect, or halt the ground disturbance activities to allow identification, evaluation, and potential recovery of cultural resources.
c) The onsite monitoring shall end when all ground -disturbing activities on the Project Site are completed, or when the Native American Tribal Monitor(s) have indicated that all upcoming ground disturbing activities at the Project Site have little to no potential for impacting Tribal Cultural Resources.

The Project Proponent shall submit a fully executed copy of the Monitoring Agreement to the City of Jurupa Valley Planning Department to ensure compliance with this mitigation measure. If there are multiple Consulting Tribes involved, a separate Monitoring Agreement is required for each. The Monitoring Agreement shall not modify any condition of approval or mitigation measure.

MM-TCR-2 Unanticipated Discovery: The Permit Applicant or any successor in interest shall comply with the following for the life of the grading permit. If, during ground disturbance activities, unanticipated cultural resources are discovered, the following procedures shall be followed:

a) Ground disturbing activities shall cease in the immediate vicinity of the find (not less than the surrounding 100 feet) until the find can be assessed. Ground disturbing activities are allowed on the remainder of the Project Site. b) The Consulting Tribe(s), the Project Archaeologist (retained by the Permit Applicant under Mitigation Measure CR-1, Retain Professional Archaeologist, of this Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration document for MA21143 and Addendum #1 to the MND MA23357 ), and the City of Jurupa Valley Community Development Department shall meet and confer, and discuss the find with respect to the following:

1. Determine if the resource is a Tribal Cultural Resource as defined by Public Resources Code §21074, if so:

2. Determine if the resource is listed or eligible for listing in the California Register on a “Local register of historical or resources” pursuant to Public Resources Code §5020.1 (k); or

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 59 ends

region, or method of construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values, or (4) Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history.
b) If the resource(s) are Native American in origin [and not a historical resource as defined by Public Resources Code §5020.1 (k) or §5024.1 (c)], the Consulting Tribe will retain it/them in the form and/or manner the Consulting Tribe (s) deems appropriate, for educational, cultur al and/or historic purposes. If multiple Consulting Tribes (s) are involved, and a mutual agreement cannot be reached as to the form and manner of disposition of the resource(s), the City shall request input from the Native American Heritage Commission and render a final decision. c) If the resource(s) is both a tribal cultural resource and a historic resource, the Project Archaeologist, the Consulting Tribe (s), and the City of Jurupa Valley Planning Department shall meet and confer and discuss the appropriate treatment (documentation, recovery, avoidance, etc.) for the cultural and historic resource.

Treatment, at a minimum, shall be consistent with Public Resources Code § 21084.3 (b). The appropriate treatment shall be prepared in conjunction with the Archaeological Treatment plan re quired by Mitigation Measure CR -2 of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for MA21143 and Addendum #1 to the MND MA23357. Further ground disturbance shall not resume within the area of the discovery until the appropriate treatment has been accomplished.

MM-TCR-3: Final Report: If a Tribal cultural resource is also a historic resource defined above, the resource shall be included in the Final Report required by Mitigation Measure CR -2 of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for MA21143 and Addendum #1 to the MND MA23357.

4.18.5 Proposed Project Impact Analysis

Development of the Proposed Project will have no new impact to Tribal Cultural resources . The Adopted MND found that the affected area is located within a traditional use area for Native Americans and as such, mitigation measures will be implemented to required, per consultations the Native American Tribes.

The proposed Project would be subject to the mitigation measures identified in the Adopted MND.

With the implementation of these Mitigation Measures, impacts related to Tribal Cultural Resources would be less than significant.

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 60 ends

4.19 Utilities and Service Systems

New Potentially
Significant
Impact
New Mitigation
Required Reduced Impact No New Impact
Would the project:
a) Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water
drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during
normal, dry, and multiple years?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
c) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
d) Generate solid waste more than State or local standards, or more than the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
e) Comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒

4.19.1 Summary of MND Conclusions

4.19. A Water Service
The Project will connect to the existing water service available from both the existing 18-inch waterline in Camino Real, an existing 8-inch waterline in Kirby Drive, or existing 12-inch and 24-inch waterlines north of Jurupa Road.

Sewer Service
The Project will connect to the existing sewer service available from the existing 8 -inch diameter line in Kirby Road.

Storm Drainage Improvements
Drainage for the Project will consist of storm drains, catch basins, and an underground water quality and infiltration basin. The site drains from the northeast to the southwest through the proposed storm drain lines and conveyed to the water quality and infiltration basin located in the southeast corner of the project site. High flows will be conveyed through an existing storm drain located along the southern boundary of the property.

Electric Power Facilities
The Project will connect to the existing Southern California Edison electrical distribution facilities available in the vicinity of the Project site.

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 61 ends

Natural Gas Facilities
The Project will connect to the existing Southern California Gas natural gas distribution facilities available in the vicinity of the Project site.

Telecommunication Facilities
Telecommunication facilities include a fixed, mobile, or transportable structure, including, all installed electrical and electronic wiring, cabling, and equipment, all supporting structures, such as utility, ground network, and electrical supporting structures, and a transmission pathway and associated equipment in order to provide cable TV, internet, telephone, and wireless telephone services to the Project site.

Services that are not provided via satellite will connect to existing facilities maintained by the various service providers.

4.19.B Water service would be provided to the Project site by Jurupa Community Services District (JCSD). JCSD has estimated the Project’s water demand at 23.3 ac.ft./year. JCDS issued a Water and Sewer Will Serve Letter (Adopted MND Appendix G) stating that the District's current water supply has sufficient capacity to meet its long -term current customers' needs per the 2015 Urban Water Management Plan, and its short -term current customers' needs and that of the proposed development a s shown in Figure

4.19.1, Jurupa Community Services District Supply vs Maximum Day Demand, 2019 - 2024.

JCDS issued Water and Sewer Will Serve Letter ( Adopted MND Appendix G) states that water service is available from both the existing 18 -inch waterline in Camino Real, an existing 8-inch waterline in Kirby Drive, or existing 12-inch and 24-inch waterlines north of Jurupa Road.

4.19.C Wastewater treatment service would be provided to the Project site by Jurupa Community Services District (JCSD). JCSD has estimated the Project’s wastewater demand at 0.0076 MGD (millions of gallons per day). JCDS issued a Water and Sewer Will Serve Letter (Appendix G) states that existing sewer service is available from the existing 8-inch diameter line in Kirby Road. In addition, JCSD maintains 4 MGD capacity rights in the City of Riverside Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant facilities, which will expand to 5 MGD in the year 2030.

4.19.D PPP 4.19-1 applies to the Project and would reduce impacts relating to solid waste. This measure will be included in the Project’s Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.

The California Green Building Standards Code (“CAL Green’), requires all newly constructed buildings to prepare a Waste Management Plan and divert construction waste through recycling and source reduction methods. The City of Jurupa Valley Building and Saf ety Department reviews and approves all new construction projects required to submit a Waste Management Plan. Mandatory compliance with CAL Green solid waste requirements as required by PPP 4.19-1 will ensure that construction waste impacts are less than significant.

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 62 ends

Based on solid waste generation usage obtained from the Project’s Summary of CalEEMod Model Runs and Output (Adopted MND Appendix A), the Project would generate approximately 17 tons of solid waste per year or 0.05 tons per day. The Project’s solid waste generation will add a minimal amount of additional solid waste of the remaining capacity of the Badlands Sanitary Landfill or the El Sobrante Sanitary Landfill. As such, the Project is not anticipated to cause these landfills to ex ceed their remaining capacities.

4.19.E PPP 4.19-1 applies to the Project and would reduce impacts relating to solid waste. This measure will be included in the Project’s Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.

The City compels its waste hauler to comply with Assembly Bill 341 (Chapter 476, Statutes of 2011), as amended by Senate Bill 1018, which became effective July 1, 2012, by providing the necessary education, outreach and monitoring programs and by processing the solid waste from the City’s residential customers through its waste hauler’s material recovery facility. The Project would be required to coordinate with the waste hauler to develop collection of recyclable materials for the Project on a common schedule as set forth in applicable local, regional, and State programs.

4.19.2 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts

There are no unavoidable adverse impacts identified in the Adopted MND .

4.17.3 Applicable General Plan Policies

PPP 4.19-1 Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Project applicant shall submit a construction waste management plan in compliance with Section 4.408 of the 2013 California Green Building Code Standards

4.19.4 Applicable Adopted MND Mitigation Measures

As described in the Adopted MND , impacts related to wildfire were determined to be less than significant and no mitigation measures were identified.

No substantial changes in the environment related to wildfire will occur with the Project modifications that would lead to more significant impacts, and no new mitigation measures are required.

4.19.5 Proposed Project Impact Analysis

On March 25, 2024, t he JCDS issued Water and Sewer Will Serve Letter (Appendix H) for water and sewer service for the proposed Project. O ther utility systems and services impacts would continue to have a less than significant impact. Based on an examination of the analysis, findings, and conclusions of the Adopted MND, implementation of the proposed modifications would not substantially increase

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 63 ends

the severity of significant impacts previously identified, nor would new significant impacts related to utilities and service systems that were not identified in the Adopted MND.

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 64 ends

4.20 Wildfire

New Potentially
Significant
Impact
New Mitigation
Required Reduced Impact No New Impact
Would the project
a) Is the project located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard
severity zones?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒

4.20.1 Summary of MND Conclusions

4.20.A A wildfire is a nonstructural fire that occurs in vegetative fuels, excluding prescribed fire.

Wildfires can occur in undeveloped areas and spread to urban areas where the landscape and structures are not designed and maintained to be ignition resistant. As stated in the State of California’s General Plan Guidelines: “ California’s increasing population and expansion of development into previously undeveloped areas is creating more ’wildland -urban interface’ issues with a corresponding increased risk of loss to human life, natural resources, and economic assets associate d with wildland fires .” To address this issue, the state passed Senate Bill 1241 to require that General Plan Safety Elements address the fire severity risks in State Responsibility Areas (SRAs) and Local Responsibility Areas (LRAs).

According to General Plan Figure 8 -11, Wildfire Severity Zones in Jurupa Valley, the Project site is not located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones.

4.20.2 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts

There are no unavoidable adverse impacts identified in the Adopted MND .

4.20.3 Applicable General Plan Policies

There are no General Plan Policies identified in the Adopted MND .

4.20.4 Applicable Adopted MND Mitigation Measures

As described in the Adopted MND, impacts related to wildfire were determined to be less than significant and no mitigation measures were identified.

No substantial changes in the environment related to wildfire will occur with the Project modifications that would lead to more significant impacts, and no new mitigation measures are required.

MA 23357
MND Addendum #1
April 16, 2024 – Revised July 31, 2024

Page 65 ends

4.20.5 Proposed Project Impact Analysis

The proposed Project site will remain in an area not located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones. The additional units proposed by the Project will therefore not exacerbate the risk of wildfire.

5.0 CONCLUSION

The proposed Project, would not result in any new significant environmental impacts, substantially increase the severity of previously identified effects, or necessitate implementation of additional or considerably different mitigation measures than those identified in the Adopted MND. The effects associated with the Modified Project would be substantially the same as those reported for the Adopted MND , and thus no supplemental or subsequent MND is required.

As described in the Environmental Checklist in Section 4.0 and based on an examination of the analysis, findings, and conclusions of the Adopted MND , implementation of the proposed project modifications would not substantially increase the severity of significant impacts previously identified, nor would new significant impacts related to environmental impacts that were not identified in the Adopted MND .

Page M-1

MITIGATION MONITORING REPORTING PROGRAM

Red text is text added and Red Text Strike-thru is text removed as a result of MA23357 Amendment to TTM 38151, and Addendum No. 1 to the Adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration (MA21143).

PROJECT NAME: MA 21143 Madone Collections Residential Project (Tentative Tract Map No. 38151) MA 23357 Amendment to TTM 38151 Addendum No. 1 to the Adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration (MA21143)

DATE: September 08, 2022, July 31, 2024

PROJECT MANAGER: Thomas Gorham, Principal Planner Miguel Del Rio, Senior Planner

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Project proposes a General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation from LDR (Country Neighborhood) to MDR (Medium Density Residential), a change of zone (CZ) from A-1 (Light Agriculture) to R-4 (Planned Development) and a tentative tract map to subdivide 6.92 acres into 35 lots for single -family detached houses. The Project will include recreational area park, dog park, walking trails, exercise stations, tot lot, Gazebo and BBQ areas, and sitting areas. The R-4 zone allows for lot sizes of a minimum overall site area of 6,000 square- feet for each dwelling unit and a minimum lot area of 3,500 square-feet.

The Modified Project proposes modifications to the approved TTM and increase the number of lots to 67 lots for single -family detached houses. The Project is requesting the density increase per the State Density Bonus Law which would provide for a density b onus of 20 percent. 1 The Project’s density of 67 residential units represents a density bonus of 16 percent. The approved GPA and CZ will not be changed by the modified Project.

The proposed Project will include recreational area park, dog park, tot lot, Gazebo and BBQ areas, and sitting areas. The proposed Project lot sizes of a minimum overall site area of 2,498 square - feet and a maximum of 5,044 square-feet with an average of 2,974.6 square-feet.

PROJECT LOCATION: The Project is located on the south of Jurupa Road, east of Kirby Street, west of Camino Real and north Camino Real Elementary School. Assessor’s Parcel No. 183-030-014.

1 State Density Bonus Law Request Letter for 7586 Jurupa Road Project dated June 30, 2023, included as Appendix A.

Page M-2

Throughout this Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program , reference is made to the following:

• Plans, Policies, or Programs (PPP) − These include existing regulatory requirements such as plans, policies, or programs applied to the Project based on the basis of federal, state, or local law currently in place which effectively reduce environmental impacts. • Mitigation Measures (MM) − These measures include requirements that are imposed where the impact analysis determines that implementation of the proposed Project would result in significant impacts; mitigation measures are proposed in accordance with the requirements of CEQA.

Any applicable Plans, Policies, or Programs (PPP) were assumed and accounted for in the assessment of impacts for each issue area. Mitigation Measures were formulated only for those issue areas where the results of the impact analysis identified significant impacts. All three types of measures described above will be required to be implemented as part of the Project.

Page M-3

MITIGATION MEASURE (MM)

PLANS, POLICIES, OR PROGRAMS (PPP)

RESPONSIBILITY
FOR

IMPLEMENTATION
TIME

FRAME/MILESTONE

VERIFIED
BY:

AESTHETICS
PPP 4.1 -1 As required by Jurupa Valley Municipal
Code section 9.100.050, development plan (called
R-4 Development Plan) that includes, but is not
limited to, development standards for structures,
pedestrian walks, recreation and other open areas,
walls, landscaping, and plans and elevations of
typical structures to indicate architectural type and
construction standards.

Planning
Department
Prior to the
issuance of building
permits

PPP 4.1 -2 As required by Jurupa Valley Municipal
Code section 7.50.010, all utilities serving and
within the Project site shall be placed underground
unless exempted by this section.

Planning
Department
Prior to the
issuance of
occupancy permits

PPP 4.1-3 All outdoor lighting shall be designed and
installed to comply with California Green Building
Standard Code Section 5.106 or with a local
ordinance lawfully enacted pursuant to California
Green Building Standard Code Section 101.7,
whichever is more stringent.

Planning
Department
Prior to the
issuance of building
permits

AIR QUALITY
PPP 4.3-1 The Project is required to comply with the
provisions of South Coast Air Quality Management
District Rule 403, “Fugitive Dust.” Rule 403 requires
implementation of best available dust control
measures during construction activities that
generate fugitive dust, such as earth moving and
stockpiling activities, grading, and equipment travel
on unpaved roads.

Public Works and
Engineering
Department
During grading
PPP 4.3-2 The Project is required to comply with the
provisions of South Coast Air Quality Management
District Rule 1186 “PM10 Emissions from Paved and
Unpaved Roads and Livestock Operations” and Rule
1186.1, “Less‐Polluting Street Sweepers.”
Adherence to Rules 118 6 and 1186.1 reduces the
release of criteria pollutant emissions into the
atmosphere during construction.

Building & Safety
Department
During construction
PPP 4.3-3 The Project is required to comply with the
provisions of South Coast Air Quality Management
District Rule 402 “ Nuisance.” Adherence to Rule
402 reduces the release of odorous emissions into
the atmosphere.

Building & Safety
Department
Engineering
Department
Planning
Department
During construction
and on-going

Page M-4

MITIGATION MEASURE (MM)

PLANS, POLICIES, OR PROGRAMS (PPP)

RESPONSIBILITY
FOR

IMPLEMENTATION
TIME

FRAME/MILESTONE

VERIFIED
BY:

PPP 4.3-4 The Project is required to comply with the
provisions of South Coast Air Quality Management
District Rule 402 “ Nuisance.” Adherence to Rule
402 reduces the release of odorous emissions into
the atmosphere.

Planning
Department
On-going

BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
PPP 4.4-1 The Project is required to pay mitigation
fees pursuant to the Western Riverside County
Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan
(MHSCP) as required by Municipal Code Chapter

3.80. Planning
Department
Prior to the
issuance of a
grading permit

MM- BIO-1: Pre -Construction Burrowing Owl
Survey / Burrowing Owl Protection . A 30-day pre-
construction survey for burrowing owls is required
prior to future ground -disturbing activities (e.g.,
vegetation clearing, clearing and grubbing, tree
removal, site watering, equipment staging, etc.) to
ensure that no owls have colonized the site in the
days or weeks preceding the ground -disturbing
activities. If burrowing owls have colonized the
project site prior to the initiation of ground -
disturbing activities, the pr oject proponent will
immediately inform the RCA and the Wildlife
Agencies and will need to coordinate in the future
with the RCA and the Wildlife Agencies, including
the possibility of preparing a Burrowing Owl
Protection and Relocation Plan, prior to init iating
ground disturbance. If ground -disturbing activities
occur, but the site is left undisturbed for more than
30 days, a pre -construction survey will again be
necessary to ensure that burrowing owl have not
colonized the site since it was last disturbed . If
burrowing owls are found, the same coordination
described in MM-BIO-1 will be necessary.

Planning
Department
Prior to the
issuance of a
grading permit

MM- BIO-2: Nesting Bird Protection. As feasible,
vegetation clearing should be conducted outside of
the nesting season, which is generally identified as
February 1 through August 31. If avoidance of the
nesting season is not feasible, then a qualified
biologist shall conduct a nesting bird survey within
three days prior to any disturbance of t he site,
including disking, vegetation grubbing, and grading.

If active nests are identified, the biologist shall
establish suitable buffers around the nests, and the
buffer areas shall be avoided until the nests are no
longer occupied and the juvenile bir ds can survive
independently from the nests.

Planning
Department
Prior to the
issuance of a
grading permit

Page M-5

MITIGATION MEASURE (MM)

PLANS, POLICIES, OR PROGRAMS (PPP)

RESPONSIBILITY
FOR

IMPLEMENTATION
TIME

FRAME/MILESTONE

VERIFIED
BY:

COS 1.2 Protection of Significant Trees. Protect and
preserve significant trees, as determined by the City
Council upon the recommendation of the Planning
Commission. Significant trees are those trees that
make substantial contributions to natural habitat or
to the urban landscape due to their s pecies, size, or
rarity. In particular, California native trees should be protected. mature native and non-native trees, and
other features of ecological, aesthetic, and
conservation value.

• Open Space Policy 9.3 - Maintain and
conserve superior examples of native
trees, natural vegetation, stands of
established trees, and other features for
ecosystem, aesthetic, and water
conservation purposes.
• Open Space Policy 9.4 - Conserve the oak
tree resources within in the County (i.e.

City).

These policies are meant to preserve the, continued
viability of habitat communities within the City. The
single coast live oak ( Quercus agrifolia) tree onsite
is a California native tree species endemic to
Southern California.

The County of Riverside has published Oak Tree
Management Guidelines, March 2, 1993 which the
City has adopted upon incorporation and apply to
oak woodlands. Although the tree is not considered
an oak woodland, the guidance provided in the
Guidelines can be used as a basis for mitigating
impacts to the tree even though it is not considered
oak woodlands because impacts to individual trees
are discussed in the Guidelines.

Planning
Department
Prior to the
issuance of a tree
removal or grading
permit

MM-BIO-3.Dedication of Open Space Lot and Tree
Maintenance. If the tree is to be preserved, prior to
the recordation of the Final Map, a lettered or
numbered lot shall be provided for the tree to be
preserved. This lot shall be dedicated to the City in
order to allow for continued maintenance of the
tree(s) the City or approved maintenance entity as
follows:
• Construction of a wrought iron fence is
necessary positioned just outside of the
dripline around the tree to reduce the risk
of injury in the event of failure.

Planning
Department
Prior to the
issuance of a tree
removal or grading
permit

Page M-6

MITIGATION MEASURE (MM)

PLANS, POLICIES, OR PROGRAMS (PPP)

RESPONSIBILITY
FOR

IMPLEMENTATION
TIME

FRAME/MILESTONE

VERIFIED
BY:
• Landscape design must integrate the
existing oak tree on site in a way that
diverts excess water runoff or irrigation
from accumulating and pooling within the
tree's dripline. This final design must be
reviewed by a certified landscape architect
and approved by the Planning Manager.
• Strategic crown thinning to reduce loading
on the stem. Heavier pruning of coast live
oaks should occur during July -August and
not more than 25% of the crown can be
removed during any single year. All
pruning should be performed or directed
by an Internati onal Society of
Arboriculture (ISA) Certified Arborist or
Tree Worker in accordance with the Best
Management Practices for Pruning by the
International Society of Arboriculture,
2002 and adhere to the most recent
editions of the American National
Standards Institute (ANSI) for Tree Care
Operations Z133.1 and Pruning A300. Any
oak tree maintenance activity onsite
should be done at the direction of an ISA
Certified Arborist or American Society of
Consulting Arborists (ASCA) Registered
Consulting Arborist.
• Oak tree pruning must be kept to a
minimum (except initially as described in
Item 4 above); it typically involves
removing dead or diseased wood,
hazardous branches, or limb structures
and providing clearance.
• Pruning should be done early during
branch development to avoid cuts greater
than 4 inches in diameter. The smaller
wound size will reduce the chance of
infection.
• Excessive and injurious pruning is defined
as the removal of more than 25 percent of
the functioning leaf, stem, or root system
of a tree in any 24-month period.
• Disinfected pruning tools must be used at
all times and in between trees to reduce

Page M-7

MITIGATION MEASURE (MM)

PLANS, POLICIES, OR PROGRAMS (PPP)

RESPONSIBILITY
FOR

IMPLEMENTATION
TIME

FRAME/MILESTONE

VERIFIED
BY:
the spread of sudden oak death and other
contagious diseases.
• Annual surveys by a certified arborist are
recommended once the development is
completed.

MM-BIO-4. Oak Tree Replacement: Prior to the
issuance of any tree removal or the issuance of a
grading permit, the oak tree shall be replaced as
follows:
• Coast Live Oak Tree: Replacement by
five, 15-gallon trees (5:1 ratio) of the
same species at the discretion of the
City's Planning Manager.

Planning
Department
Prior to the
issuance of a tree
removal or grading
permit

CULTURAL RESOURCES
PPP 4.5-1 The project is required to comply with the
applicable provisions of California Health and Safety
Code §7050.5 as well as Public Resources Code
§5097 et. seq.

Public Works and
Engineering
Department
Prior to the issuance
of grading permits
and during
construction

MM- CR-1: Archaeological Monitoring. Prior to
issuance of grading permits, the Permit Applicant
shall provide evidence to the City of Jurupa Valley
Community Development Department that a
qualified professional archaeologist (Professional
Archaeologist) that is listed on the City of Jurupa
Valley Cultural Resources Consultant List or the
Cultural Resource Consultant List maintained by the
County of Riverside Planning Department, has been
contracted to implement Archaeological Monitoring
for the area of impact for the Project. Monitoring
shall be conducted in coordination with the
Consulting Tribe(s), defined as a Tribe that initiated
the tribal consultation process for the Project as
provided for in Public Resources Code §21080.3.1(b)
(“AB52”) and has not opted out of the AB 52
consultation process, and has completed AB 52
consultation with the City. Monitoring shall address
the details of all ground -disturbing activities and
provides procedures that must be followed to avoid
or reduce potential impacts on cultural,
archaeological, and tribal cultural resources to a
level that is less than significant.

A fully executed copy of the Archaeological
Monitoring Agreement shall be provided to the City
of Jurupa Valley Planning Department to ensure
Planning
Department
Prior to the issuance
of a grading permit,
the complete text of
MM CR -1 shall be
placed on the
grading plan.

Page M-8

MITIGATION MEASURE (MM)

PLANS, POLICIES, OR PROGRAMS (PPP)

RESPONSIBILITY
FOR

IMPLEMENTATION
TIME

FRAME/MILESTONE

VERIFIED
BY:
compliance with this measure. If the resource is
significant, Mitigation Measure CR‐2 shall apply.

MM- CR-2: Archaeological Inadvertent Discovery .

The Project Archaeologist shall prepare and
implement a treatment plan to protect the
identified archaeological resource(s) from damage
and destruction. The treatment plan shall be per
CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f) for historical
resources and Public Resources Code § 21083.2(b)
for unique archaeological resources. Preservation
in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of
treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible,
treatment may in clude implementing
archaeological data recovery excavations to
remove the resource and subsequent laboratory
processing and analysis. If historic Native American
tribal cultural resources are involved, the
Treatment Plan shall be coordinated with the
Consulting Native American Tribe(s) as described in
Mitigation Measure TCR -1 through TCR -3 of the
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for
MA21143 and Addendum #1 to the MND MA23357.

Public Works and
Engineering
Department
Planning
Department
Prior to the issuance
of a grading permit,
the complete text of
MM CR -2 shall be
placed on the
grading plan.

MM- CR-3: Final Report : A final report containing
the significance and treatment findings shall be
prepared by the Project Archaeologist and
submitted to the City of Jurupa Valley Community
Development Department and the Eastern
Information Center, University of California,
Riverside. If a historic tribal cultural resource is
involved, a copy shall be provided to the Consulting
Native American Tribe(s) as described in Mitigation
Measure TCR -1 through 3 of the Initial
Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for MA21143
and Addendum #1 to the MND MA23357.

Public Works and
Engineering
Department
Planning
Department
Prior to the issuance
of a grading permit,
the complete text of
MM CR -3 shall be
placed on the
grading plan.

GEOLOGY AND SOILS
PPP 4.7 -1 As required by Municipal Code Section

8.05.010, the Project is required to comply with the
most recent edition of the California Building Code
to preclude significant adverse effects associated
with seismic hazards.

Building & Safety
Department
Prior to the
issuance of building
permits

PPP’s 4.10 -1 through PPP 4.10 -3 in Section 4.10,
Hydrology and Water Quality shall apply.

Engineering
Department
Prior to the
issuance of a
grading permit and
during operation

Page M-9

MITIGATION MEASURE (MM)

PLANS, POLICIES, OR PROGRAMS (PPP)

RESPONSIBILITY
FOR

IMPLEMENTATION
TIME

FRAME/MILESTONE

VERIFIED
BY:

MM-GEO-1: Paleontological Monitoring.

Prior to the issuance of grading permits, a qualified
Paleontologist shall be retained to conduct
monitoring as necessary during ground -disturbing
activities such as vegetation removal, grading, and
other excavations related to the project. The
Paleontologist shall be present at the pre -grade
conference and shall establish a schedule for
paleontological resource surveillance based on the
nature of planned activities. The Paleontologist
shall establish, in cooperation with the lead agency,
procedures for tem porarily halting or redirecting
work, if any is ongoing, to permit the sampling,
identification, and evaluation of cultural resources
as appropriate. If the paleontological resources are
found to be significant, the Paleontologist/Monitor
shall determine appropriate actions, in cooperation
with the lead agency, for exploration and/or
salvage. Significant sites that cannot be avoided will
require data recovery measures and shall be
completed upon approval of a Data Recovery Plan.

Panning
Department
Prior to the issuance
of a grading permit,
the complete text of
MM GEO -1 shall be
placed on the
grading plan.

MM-GEO-2: Paleontological Treatment Plan Prior
to the issuance of grading permits, a qualified
paleontologist shall be retained to observe ground-
disturbing activities and recover fossil resources as
necessary when construction activities will impact
the older Quaternary Alluvium. The Paleontolo gist
will attend the pre -grade conference and establish
procedures and protocols for paleontological
monitoring and to temporarily halt ground -
disturbing activities to permit sampling, evaluation,
and recovery of any discovery. Substantial
excavations belo w the uppermost layers (more
than 3 feet below surface) should be monitored.

Sediment samples should be recovered to
determine the small-fossil potential of the site. If a
discovery is determined to be significant, additional
excavations and salvage of the fossil may be
necessary to ensure that any impacts to it are
mitigated to a less than significant level.

Public Works and
Engineering
Department
Planning
Department
Prior to the issuance
of a grading permit,
the complete text of
MM GEO -2 shall be
placed on the
grading plan.

GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
PPP 4.8-1 Prior to issuance of a building permit, the
Project Applicant shall submit plans showing that
the Project will be constructed in compliance with
the most recently adopted edition of the applicable
California Energy Code, (Part 6 of Title 24 of the
California Code of Regulations) and the California
Building & Safety
Department
Prior to the
issuance of building
permits

Page M-10

MITIGATION MEASURE (MM)

PLANS, POLICIES, OR PROGRAMS (PPP)

RESPONSIBILITY
FOR

IMPLEMENTATION
TIME

FRAME/MILESTONE

VERIFIED
BY:

Green Building Standards Code, 2019 Edition (Part
11 of Title 24 of the California Code of
Regulations).

PPP 4.8 -2 As required by Municipal Code Section

9.283.010, Water Efficient Landscape Design
Requirements, prior to the approval of landscaping
plans, the Project proponent shall prepare and
submit landscape plans that demonstrate
compliance with this section.

Building & Safety
Department
Prior to the
issuance of building
permits

HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY
PPP 4.10 -1 As required by Municipal Code Chapter

6.05.050, Storm Water/Urban Runoff Management and
Discharge Controls, Section B (1), any person performing construction work in the city shall comply with the
provisions of this chapter, and shall control storm water runoff so as to prevent any likelihood of adversely
affecting human health or the environment. The City
Engineer shall ident ify the BMPs that may be
implemented to prevent such deterioration and shall
identify the manner of implementation. Documentation
on the effectiveness of BMPs implemented to reduce
the discharge of pollutants to the MS4 shall be required when requested by the City Engineer.

Public Works and
Engineering
Department
Prior to the
issuance of
grading permits

PPP 4.10 -2 As required by Municipal Code Chapter

6.05.050, Storm Water/Urban Runoff Management and
Discharge Controls, Section B (2), any person performing construction work in the city shall be regulated by the State Water Resources Control Board in a manner
pursuant to and consistent with applicable
requirements contained in the General Permit No.

CAS000002, State Water Resources Control Board Order
Number 2009-0009-DWQ. The city may notify the State
Board of any person performing construction work that
has a non -compliant construction site per the General
Permit.

Public Works and
Engineering
Department
Prior to the
issuance of
grading permits
and during
construction

PPP 4.10 -3 As required by Municipal Code Chapter

6.05.050, Storm Water/Urban Runoff Management and
Discharge Controls , Section C , n ew development, or
redevelopment projects shall control storm water
runoff so as to prevent any deterioration of water
quality that would impair subsequent or competing uses
of the water. The City Engineer shall identify the BMPs that may be implemented to prevent such deterioration
and shall identify the manner of implementation.

Public Works and
Engineering
Department
Prior to the
issuance of
grading permits
and during
operation

Page M-11

Documentation on the effectiveness of BMPs
implemented to reduce the discharge of pollutants to
the MS4 shall be required when requested by the City
Engineer. The BMPs may include, but are not limited to, the following and may, among other things, require new
developments or redevelopments to do any of the
following:
(1) Increase permeable areas by leaving highly porous
soil and low-lying area undisturbed by:
(a) Incorporating landscaping, green roofs and open
space into the project design;
(b) Using porous materials for or near driveways,
drive aisles, parking stalls and low volume
roads and walkways; and
(c) Incorporating detention ponds and infiltration
pits into the project design.
(2) Direct runoff to permeable areas by
orienting it away from impermeable areas to
swales, berms, green strip filters, gravel beds,
rain gardens, pervious pavement or other
approved green infrastructure and French
drains by:
(a) Installing rain -gutters oriented towards
permeable areas;
(b) Modifying the grade of the property to
divert flow to permeable areas and minimize
the amount of storm water runoff leaving the
property; and
(c) Designing curbs, berms, or other structures
such that they do not isolate permeable or
landscaped areas.
(3) Maximize storm water storage for reuse by
using retention structures, subsurface areas,
cisterns, or other structures to store storm
water runoff for reuse or slow release.
(4) Rain gardens may be proposed in -lieu of a
water quality basin when applicable and
approved by the City Engineer.

NOISE
MM - NOI-1-Construction Noise Mitigation. Prior to the
issuance of a grading permit, the following notes be
included on grading plans and building plans. Project
contractors shall be required to ensure compliance with the notes and permit periodic inspection of the
Planning
Department
Prior to the
issuance of a
grading permit

Page M-12

construction site by City of Jurupa Valley staff or its designee to confirm compliance. These notes also shall
be specified in bid documents issued to prospective
construction contractors.
a) Haul truck deliveries shall be limited to between the hours of 6:00am to 6:00pm during the months of June
through September and 7:00am to 6:00pm during the
months of October through May.
b) Construction contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers, consistent with manufacturers’
standards.
c) All stationary construction equipment shall be placed in such a manner so that emitted noise is directed away from any sensitive receptors adjacent to the Project site. d) Construction equipment staging areas shall be
located the greatest distance between the staging area
and the nearest sensitive receptors.”

PUBLIC SERVICES
PPP 4.15-1 The Project applicant shall comply with all
applicable Riverside County Fire Department codes,
ordinances, and standard conditions regarding fire
prevention and suppression measures relating to water
improvement plans, fire hydrants, automatic fire
extinguishing systems, fire access, access gates,
combustible construction, water availability, and fire
sprinkler systems.

Fire Department Prior to issuance
of a building
permit or
occupancy
permit as
determined by
the Fire
Department

PPP 4.15-2 As required by Municipal Code Chapter 3.75,
the Project is required to pay a Development Impact Fee that the City can use to improve public facilities and/or, to offset the incremental increase in the demand for
public services that would be created by the Project.

Building & Safety
Department
Per Municipal
Code Chapter

3.75 PPP45.15-3 Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the Project Applicant shall pay required development
impact fees to the Jurupa Unified School District
following protocol for impact fee collection.

Building & Safety
Department
Prior to the
issuance of
building permits

PPP 4.15-4 & 4.16-1 Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the Project Applicant shall pay required park
development impact fees to the Jurupa Area Recreation
and Park District pursuant to District Ordinance No. 01 - 2007 and 02-2008.

Page M-13

RECREATION
PPP 4.16-1 Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the Project Applicant shall pay required park
development impact fees to the Jurupa Area Recreation
and Park District pursuant to District Ordinance No. 01 - 2007 and 02-2008.

Building & Safety
Department
Prior to the
issuance of
building permits

TRANSPORTATION
MM-VMT-1: Electrical Vehicle Charging: Prior to the
issuance of a building permit, construction
drawings/plans shall include Level 2 electric vehicle
charging plugs in at least 50% of the proposed 35 units.

Public Works and
Engineering
Department
Prior to the
issuance of
grading permits
and during
operation

MM-VMT-2: Sidewalk Connections: Prior to the
issuance of a building permit, street improvement plans shall show sidewalks within the development that
connect to the existing sidewalk to the south on Camino Real and to the existing crosswalks at Jurupa Road.

Public Works and
Engineering
Department
Prior to the
issuance of
grading permits
and during
operation

VMT-3: High Destination Accessibility: Benefit to
walking distance to area schools and Mission Boulevard
transit corridor
Public Works and
Engineering
Department
Prior to the
issuance of
grading permits
and during
operation

VMT-4: Traffic Calming and Safety Measures: Provide
for the placement/refreshing of high -visibility
crosswalks at 5 locations determined by the City.

Public Works and
Engineering
Department
Prior to the
issuance of
grading permits
and during
operation

VMT-5: Improve Transit (Bus Shelter): Provide one (1)
bus shelter along Mission Boulevard. Location to be
determined by City and RTA.

Public Works and
Engineering
Department
Prior to the
issuance of
grading permits
and during
operation

TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES
MM- TCR-1: Native American Monitoring Agreement .

Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Permit
Applicant shall enter into a Monitoring Agreement with
the Consulting Tribe(s) for Native American Monitor(s)
to be onsite during ground disturbing activities allowed by the grading permit. A Consulting Tribe is defined as a tribe that initiated the AB 52 tribal consultation process for the Project, has not opted out of the AB 52
consultation process, and has completed AB 52
consultation with the City as provided for in Pub lic
Resources Code §21080.3.1(b). Ground disturbing
activities and include excavation of each portion of the project site including clearing, grubbing, tree removals, grading and trenching.

Planning Department

Prior to the
issuance of a
grading permit

Page M-14

The Monitoring Agreement shall include, but is
not limited to, the following provisions:
a) Provide a minimum of 30 days
advance notice to the Consulting
Tribe(s) of all ground disturbing
activities.
b) In conjunction with the
Archaeological Monitor(s) required
by Mitigation Measure CR -1 under
Section 4.5, Cultural Resources, of
the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative
Declaration for MA21347 and
Addendum #1 to the MND
MA23357, the Native American
Monitor(s) shall have the authority
to temporarily divert, redirect, or
halt the ground disturbance
activities to allow identification,
evaluation, and potential recovery
of cultural resources.
c) The onsite monitoring shall end
when all ground -disturbing
activities on the Project Site are
completed, or when the Native
American Tribal Monitor(s) have
indicated that all upcoming ground
disturbing activities at the Project
Site have little to no po tential for
impacting Tribal Cultural
Resources.

The Project Proponent shall submit a fully
executed copy of the Monitoring Agreement to
the City of Jurupa Valley Planning Department
to ensure compliance with this mitigation
measure. If there are multiple Consulting
Tribes involved, a separate Monitorin g
Agreement is required for each. The
Monitoring Agreement shall not modify any
condition of approval or mitigation measure.

MM-TCR-2: Unanticipated Discovery: The Permit
Applicant or any successor in interest shall comply with the following for the life of the grading permit. If, during ground disturbance activities, unanticipated cultural
resources are discovered, the following procedures
shall be followed:
a) Ground disturbing activities shall cease in the
immediate vicinity of the find (not less than the
surrounding 100 feet) until the find can be
Planning Department
Engineering
Department
Prior to the
issuance of a
grading permit

Page M-15

assessed. Ground disturbing activities are
allowed on the remainder of the Project Site.
b) The Consulting Tribe(s), the Project
Archaeologist (retained by the Permit
Applicant under Mitigation Measure CR -1,
Retain Professional Archaeologist, of this
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
document for MA21143 and Addendum #1 to
the MND MA23357 ), and the City of Jurupa
Valley Community Development Department
shall meet and confer, and discuss the find with
respect to the following:

1. Determine if the resource is a Tribal
Cultural Resource as defined by Public
Resources Code §21074, if so:

2. Determine if the resource is listed or
eligible for listing in the California Register
on a “Local register of historical or
resources” pursuant to Public Resources
Code §5020.1 (k); or

3. Pursuant to Public Resources Code §
5024.1 (c) as it pertains to the Consulting
Tribe(s): (1) Is associated with events that
have made a significant contribution to the
broad patterns of California’s history and
cultural heritage, (2) Is associated with the
lives of persons important in our past, (3)
Embodies the distinctive characteristics of
a type, period, region, or method of
construction, or represents the work of an
important creative individual, or possesses
high artistic values, or (4) Has yielded, or
may be likely to yield, information
important in prehistory or history.

c) If the resource(s) are Native American in origin
[and not a historical resource as defined by
Public Resources Code §5020.1 (k) or §5024.1
(c)], the Consulting Tribe will retain it/them in
the form and/or manner the Consulting Tribe
(s) deems appropriate, for educational,
cultural and/or historic purposes. If multiple
Consulting Tribes (s) are involved, and a
mutual agreement cannot be reached as to
the form and manner of disposition of the
resource(s), the City shall request input from
the Native American Heritage Commission
and render a final decision.

Page M-16

d) If the resource(s) is both a tribal cultural
resource and a historic resource, the Project
Archaeologist, the Consulting Tribe (s), and
the City of Jurupa Valley Planning Department
shall meet and confer and discuss the
appropriate treatment (documentation,
recovery, avoidance, etc.) for the cultural and
historic resource. Treatment, at a minimum,
shall be consistent with Public Resources Code
§ 21084.3 (b). The appropriate treatment shall
be prepared in conjunction with the
Archaeological Treatment plan required by
Mitigation Measure CR-2 of the Initial
Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for
MA21143 and Addendum #1 to the MND
MA23357. Further ground disturbance shall
not resume within the area of the discovery
until the appropriate treatment has been
accomplished.

MM - TCR-3: Final Report: If a Tribal cultural resource is also a historic resource defined above, the resource
shall be included in the Final Report required by
Mitigation Measure CR -2 of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for MA21143 and Addendum #1
to the MND MA23357.

Planning Department

Prior to the
issuance of a
grading permit

UTILITY AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
PPP 4.19-1 The Project shall comply with Section 4.408
of the 2013 California Green Building Code Standards,
which requires new development projects to submit
and implement a construction waste management plan
in order to reduce the amount of construction waste
transported to landfills.

Building & Safety
Department
Prior to the
issuance of
building permits

ATTACHMENT NO. 2
Exhibit B Conditions of Approval
JURUPA 67 DENSITY BONUS SUBDIVISION (TTM38888, SDP23172) FEBRUARY 6, 2025 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MA23357
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XX

Page 1 of 14 ends

EXHIBIT A

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

1. PROJECT PERMITTED . MA23357 (TTM38888, SDP23172 , and D B24001) is an approval to subdivide 6.92 acres into sixty-seven (67) single-family lots, three (3) open space recreation lots, one (1) detention basin, five (5) private streets, and three (3) private alleys at 7586 Jurupa Road (APN:183-030-014). The proposed project includes a density bonus application for a density bonus of twelve (12) bonus units , one incentive/concession, and waivers of development standards per State Density Bonus Law.

2. INDEMNIFY CITY. The applicant, the property owner or other holder of the right to the development entitlement(s) or permit(s) approved by the City for the project, if different from the applicant (herein, collectively, the “Indemnitor”), shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City of Jurupa Valley and its elected city council, its appointed boards, commissions, and committees, and its officials, employees, and agents (herein, collectively, the “Indemnitees”) from and against any and all claims, liab ilities, losses, fines, penalties, and expenses, including without limitation litigation expenses and attorney’s fees, arising out of either (i) the City’s approval of the project, including without limitation any judicial or administrative proceeding initiated or maintained by any person or entity challenging the validity or enforceability of any City permit or approval relating to the project, any condition of approval imposed by City on such permit or approval, and any finding or determination made and any other action taken by any of the Indemnitees in conjunction with such permit or approval, including without limitation any action taken pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), or (ii) the acts, omissions, or operations of the Inde mnitor and the directors, officers, members, partners, employees, agents, contractors, and subcontractors of each person or entity comprising the Indemnitor with respect to the ownership, planning, design, construction, and maintenance of the project and the property for which the project is being approved. The City shall notify the Indemnitor of any claim, lawsuit, or other judicial or administrative proceeding (herein, an “Action”) within the scope of this indemnity obligation and request that the Indemnitor defend such Action with legal counsel reasonably satisfactory to the City. If the Indemnitor fails to so defend the Action, the City shall have the right but not the obligation to do so and, if it does, the Indemnitor shall promptly pay the City’s full cost thereof. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the indemnity obligation under clause (ii) of the first sentence of this condition shall not apply to the extent the claim arises out of the willful misconduct or the sole active negligence of the City.

3. CONSENT TO CONDITIONS. Within thirty (30) days after project approval, the owner or designee shall submit written consent to the required conditions of approval to the Community Development Director or designee.

4. FEES. The approval of MA23357 (TTM38888, SDP23172, & DB24001) shall not become effective until all planning fees have been paid in full.

5. MITIGATION MEASURES. This project shall be subject to, and comply with, all of the mitigation measures set forth in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program in connection with the adoption of a n Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project.

JURUPA 67 DENSITY BONUS SUBDIVISION (TTM38888, SDP23172) FEBRUARY 6, 2025 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MA23357
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XX

Page 2 of 14 ends

6. INCORPORATE CONDITIONS . Prior to the issuance of any building permit , the owner or designee shall include within the first four pages of the working drawings a list of all conditions of approval imposed by the project’s final approval.

7. APPROVAL PERIOD – Tentative Tract Map. Tentative Tract Map (TTM3 8888) shall expire 36 months after such approval unless, within that period of time, a final map shall have been approved and filed with the County Recorder. Prior to the expiration date, the land divider may apply in writing for an extension of time pursuant to Title 7 (Subdivisions) of the J.V.M.C. If the tentative map expires before the recordation of the final map, or any phase thereof, no recordation of the final map, or any phase thereof, shall be permitted.

8. CONFORMANCE TO APPROVED EXHIBITS . The project shall be in conformance to the approved plans (listed below) as amended by these conditions in accordance to these conditions of approval:
a. Tentative Tract Map No. 3 8888: prepared by Adkan Engineers (dated: July 17, 2024)
b. Preliminary Landscape Plan/ Wall and Fence Plan prepared by BMLA Landscape Architecture (dated: June 25, 2024)
c. Neighborhood Development Plan prepared by Warmington Residential (dated June 3, 2024)
d. Conceptual Grading Plan prepared by Adkan Engineers (dated: July 17, 2024

9. BUILDING HEIGHT. Consistent with Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Section

9.240.550(E)(3), the number of lots within the subdivision with two (2) story dwellings shall not exceed twenty-five (25) percent, no two (2) story dwelling may be located on a lot adjacent to another two (2) story dwelling and no two (2) story dwelling may be located on a corner lot.

10. LANDSCAPING. Consistent with Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Section

9.240.550(E)(13), each lot shall provide one (1) thirty -six (36) inch box tree in the front yard and the rear yard setback area of each lot shall provide landscaping. Each lot shall provide landscaping to cover ninety (90) percent of the lot’s open space.

11. OWNERSHIP AND MAINTENANCE OF COMMON AREA. Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall be approved by the Community Development Director and City Engineer. The CC&Rs shall be recorded concurrently with the final map or prior to the recordation of the final map, providing for maintenance of the property in perpetuity. The CC&Rs shall, at a minimum, include provisions for the following items unless it is deemed unnecessary by the Community Development Director:
a. Formation of a Permanent Organization for the ownership and maintenance of all common areas including, but not limited to, landscaping, open space, common recreation, common parking areas, and circulation systems (areas) in perpetuity. b. The CC&Rs shall identify the common areas for ownership and maintenance. The common areas shall include the following applicable items:
i. Access and circulation areas
ii. Drainage facilities
iii. Reciprocal access
JURUPA 67 DENSITY BONUS SUBDIVISION (TTM38888, SDP23172) FEBRUARY 6, 2025 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MA23357
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XX

Page 3 of 14 ends

iv. Private and/or public utility easements
v. Identify common areas (including tot lots, recreational areas, etc.) vi. Allowed users of common areas
vii. Landscaping and Irrigation
viii. On-site lighting fixtures
ix. Walls and fences
x. Community signage
xi. All on-site storm water and water quality management post -construction facilities and features (BMPs) shall require maintenance by the property owner(s). Regulations for operations and maintenance shall be clearly stated in the CC&Rs
xii. Other items the Community Development Director and City Engineer deem appropriate

12. PROJECT DESIGN APPROVALS. Prior to issuance of the first building permit for a model home or dwelling uni t, whichever occurs first , the following plans shall be approved consistent with the approved Neighborhood Development Plan:
a. Final Site (Plotting) Plan for Dwellings and Model Homes. b. Architectural Styles for Dwellings and Model Homes.
c. Neighborhood Entry Statements (monument signs)
d. Wall and Fence Plan (Includes elevations, color, and materials) e. Traffic calming signage plan for City evaluation and approval (proposed signage to slow traffic on private streets to ensure safety for pedestrians and other vehicles within the subdivision).
f. Review of model homes (architectural styles and floor plans) g. Mailboxes (includes elevations, color, and materials) A PROS application with related fees shall be submitted to the Planning Division for the review of Items a-g.

13. MAINTENANCE OF PROPERTY. The project site shall be maintained as required by the CC&R’s and these Conditions of Approval . Property owners and/or tenants of each property shall maintain the lot and be kept free of debris, weeds, abandoned vehicles, code violations, and any other factor or condition that may contribute to potential blight or crime.

14. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE. All landscaped areas shall be maintained as approved on the final landscape plans in an orderly, attractive and healthy condition. This shall include proper pruning, mowing of turf areas, weeding, removal of litter, fertilization, replacement of plants wh en necessary, and the regular application of appropriate quantities of water to all landscaped areas. Irrigation systems shall be maintained as approved on the final landscape plans in proper operating condition. Waterline breaks, head/emitter ruptures, overspray or runoff conditions and other irrigation system failures shall be repaired immediately. The applicant shall maintain canopy trees in a manner that they provide the required shade coverage and encourages the canopy to grow to provide JURUPA 67 DENSITY BONUS SUBDIVISION (TTM38888, SDP23172) FEBRUARY 6, 2025 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MA23357
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XX

Page 4 of 14 ends

shade. Avoid topping trees or pruning the trees in a manner that the trees do not achieve mature height and form.

15. UNDERGROUNDING OF DRAINAGE. Driveway and parking areas shall not incorporate center swales, ribbon gutters, concrete valleys, etc. All drainage in common and private use areas shall be underground and shall not incorporate open gutters or swales.

16. BACKFLOW DEVICES. The location of all backflow devices shall be approved by the City prior to installation. Backflow devices shall be located to be minimally visible from the public right of way.

17. PLANNING REVIEW OF GRADING PLANS . Prior to the issuance of any grading permit, the permit shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development

18. ON-SITE LANDSCAPING. The following items shall be approved by the Community Development Director, including landscape and irrigation plans as modified in accordance with this condition prior to the issuance of the first building permit of the subdivision:
a. Complete “Professional Services (PROS)” application (Planning) for the review of the final landscape, irrigation, and shading plans.
b. Initial deposit for PROS application.
c. The total cost estimate of landscaping, irrigation, labor, and one-year maintenance. d. Completed “City Faithful Performance Bond for Landscape Improvements” form with original signatures after the City provides the applicant with the required amount of bond. This bond is for landscaping not within publicly maintained areas.

A performance bond shall be posted at 110% of the total cost estimate of landscaping, irrigation, labor, and one -year main tenance. The Community Development Director may consider a cash bond if appropriate. e. Completed City Agreement for Landscape Improvements
f. Three (3) sets of final on-site landscape, irrigation plans, shading plan with digital copies in 8.5” x 11” that shall address all of the following requirements:
i. Compliance with Chapter 9.283 Water Efficien t Landscape Design Requirements
ii. Consistent with the approved conceptual plans
Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for each home the following events shall be satisfied in the order it is listed:
iii. Substantial Conformance Letter : The Landscape Architect of Record shall conduct an inspection and submit a letter to the City of Jurupa Valley Community Development Department once the landscape architect has deemed the installation is in conformance to the approved plans. iv. City Inspection: The City landscape architect shall conduct an inspection of the installation to confirm the landscape and irrigation plan was constructed in accordance to the approved plans.

Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for the final home the following events shall be satisfied for common space landscaping, in the order it is listed:

JURUPA 67 DENSITY BONUS SUBDIVISION (TTM38888, SDP23172) FEBRUARY 6, 2025 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MA23357
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XX

Page 5 of 14 ends

vi. Substantial Conformance Letter : The Landscape Architect of Record shall conduct an inspection and submit a letter to the City of Jurupa Valley Community Development Department once the landscape architect has deemed the installation is in conformance to the approved plans. vii. City Inspection: The City landscape architect shall conduct an inspection of the installation to confirm the landscape and irrigation plan was constructed in accordance to the approved plans.

19. MODEL HOME ON-SITE LANDSCAPING. In the event that model homes are proposed to be constructed, the following must be approved and/or executed prior to the issuance of any building permits for model homes:
a. Landscape and irrigation plans
b. Landscape agreement and performance bond if the Director deems it necessary

20. EV CHARGING STATIONS. Each home shall be provided with the infrastructure for a minimum of one (1) electric vehicle (EV) charging station. EV charging station plans shall be approved by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of the first building permit for a residential unit of the development project.

21. OUTDOOR LIGHTING. All outdoor lighting fixtures shall be maintained in good condition.

Light fixtures shall be shielded to prevent any light to flood onto adjacent properties. A photometric plan and exhibits of lighting fixtures shall be approved by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of the first building permit for a residential unit of the development project.

22. UTILITY METERS. Utility meters and equipment related to the utility meters affixed to the exterior walls of buildings shall be painted to match the surface that they are mounted to.

23. GRAFFITI PROTECTION FOR WALLS. Plans that include anti -graffiti coating or protection for the exterior side of all perimeter walls and exterior of building walls to half the height of the structure, or 12 feet, whichever is greater, shall be approved by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of any building permit.

The removal of any graffiti on the property shall occur as soon as possible but no later than within 24 hours of the City’s notice.

24. TRASH COLLECTION.
a. Prior to issuance of building permits , the applicant shall prepare a Waste Service Plan for review and approval by the City and the City's franchise waste hauler. The service plan shall identify the location of all carts (trash, mixed recyclables, and green waste) staged for collection. Carts are 26" wide and should be spaced approximately 12" apart.
b. An approval or clearance letter making reference to the Waste Service Plan from the waste collection agency shall be submitted to the Community Development Department prior to the issuance of any building permit.

25. IMPACT FEES. The applicant shall the pay the following impact fees (unless exempt) in accordance to Title 3 of the Municipal Code:

JURUPA 67 DENSITY BONUS SUBDIVISION (TTM38888, SDP23172) FEBRUARY 6, 2025 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MA23357
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XX

Page 6 of 14 ends

a. Development Impact Fee (DIF) Program. The applicant shall pay any owed DIFs by the required deadline pursuant to Chapter 3.75 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code.
b. Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Mitigation (MSHCP) Fee. The applicant shall pay any owed MSHCP fees by the required deadline pursuant to Chapter 3.80 of the Municipal Code.
c. Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program. The applicant shall show proof of payment of TUMF fees by the required deadline pursuant to Chapter

3.70 of the Municipal Code.

26. INCLUSIONARY HOUSING.
a. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the following documents shall be approved under a “Professional Services” application:
i. Site Plan showing the location of inclusionary units within the development. ii. In accordance with the Density Bonus Law (Government Code Sections 65915 to 65918), an Affordability Agreement shall be approved for all affordable units by the Director of Community Development and the City Attorney.
b. Prior to or concurrently with the recordation of the final map, the Affordability Agreement shall be recorded.
c. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the following documents shall be approved under a “Professional Services” application:
i. Marketing Plan.
ii. Inclusionary Housing Plan.

27. JURUPA AREA RECREATION AND PARK DISTRICT (JARPD). Prior to the issuance of any building permit , the applicant shall submit proof of satisfying any fees, dedications, or requirements by the Jurupa Area Recreation and Park District to the Building Official.

28. JARPD CFD. Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall annex into the existing Jurupa Area Recreation and Park District (JARPD) District -Wide Community Facilities District (CFD) or form a new Community Facilities District (CFD) to pay for park maintenance.

29. SALE OF INDIVIDUAL BUILDINGS. No structure constructed on Project site may be sold until the subject Project on which the structure is located is divided and a final map recorded in accordance with the City’s subdivision regulations such that the structure is located on a separate legally divided parcel.

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

30. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS (ENGINEERING)

30.1. The use hereby conditioned is for a Schedule “A” subdivision, Tentative Tract No. 38888(TTM38888); being a subdivision of a portion of Lot 4 as shown by map of subdivisions of a portion of Jurupa Rancho, in Book 9, Page 26, of Maps, Records of San Bernardino County, California; more particularly Assessor’s Parcel Number 183 - JURUPA 67 DENSITY BONUS SUBDIVISION (TTM38888, SDP23172) FEBRUARY 6, 2025 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MA23357
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XX

Page 7 of 14 ends

030-014; containing 6.88 acres gross. The following exhibit is hereby referenced:

Tentative Tract Map No. 38888, prepared by Adkans Engineers and dated July 10, 2024 and Conceptual Grading Plans for TTM38888, prepared by Adkans Engineers and dated July 10, 2024.

30.2. The Tract Map preparation shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act, the City of Jurupa Valley Municipal Code, and Riverside County Ordinance No. 460; as it pertains to Schedule “A” subdivision, unless otherwise modified by the conditions listed herein.

30.3. It is expected that the tentative map and site plan exhibits are all inclusive of a parcel or parcels of land legally subdivided in compliance with the Subdivision Map Act, and local ordinance.

30.4. It is expected that any easements shown on the referenced exhibits are shown correctly and include all the easements that encumber the subject property. The Applicant shall secure approval from all (if any) easement holders for all grading and improvements which are proposed over the respective easement or provide evidence that the easement has been relocated, quitclaimed, vacated, abandoned, easement holder cannot be found, or is otherwise of no affect. Should such approvals or alternate action regarding the easements n ot be provided, the Applicant may be required to amend or revise the permit.

30.5. Improvements such as landscaping, streetlights, and other street infrastructure within the dedicated private right -of-way as shown on the referenced exhibit shall be maintained by a Homeowner’s Association (HOA) .

31. PRIOR TO GRADING PERMIT (ENGINEERING)

31.1. In compliance with Jurupa Valley Municipal Code, Chapter 8.70, no grading permit shall be issued until the Tentative Tract Map (TTM) and all other planning permits associated with MA23357 are approved and are in effect.

31.2. All grading shall conform to the California Building Code, as adopted by the City of Jurupa Valley, the City’s Municipal Code Title 8, and all other relevant laws, rules, and regulations governing grading in the City of Jurupa Valley and state of Californi a.

Grading shall be performed in accordance with the recommendations of the approved project specific geotechnical report. Grading p lans shall be approved by the City Engineer and financial securities for grading, if applicable, shall be in place prior to permit issuance.

31.2.1. Prior to approval of the precise grading plan, the Applicant shall prepare a project-specific geotechnical report for review and appro val of the City Engineer for TTM38888.

31.3. The Applicant shall prepare a precise grading plan for the project site.

31.3.1. The grading plan shall be prepared under the supervision of a civil engineer licensed in the state of California (Project Civil Engineer) and he/she must sign the plan. The printed name and contact information of the Project Civil Engineer shall be included on the face of the grading plan. The grading plan shall be approved by the City Engineer.

JURUPA 67 DENSITY BONUS SUBDIVISION (TTM38888, SDP23172) FEBRUARY 6, 2025 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MA23357
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XX

Page 8 of 14 ends

31.3.2. The grading plan shall provide for acceptance and proper disposal of all off - site drainage flowing onto or through the site. Should the quantities of flow exceed the capacity of the conveyance facility, the Applicant shall provide adequate drainage facilities and/or appropriate easement(s), if necessary, as approved by the City Engineer.

31.3.3. The grading plan shall provide for protection of downstream properties from damages caused by alteration of the drainage patterns, i.e., concentration or diversion of flow. Protection shall be provided by constructing adequate drainage facilities including enlarging existing facilities and/or by securing a drainage easement(s), if necessary, as approved by the City Engineer.

31.3.4. Temporary erosion control measures shall be implemented immediately following rough grading to prevent transport and deposition of earthen materials onto downstream/downwind properties, public rights -of-way, or other drainage facilities. Erosion Control Plans showing these measures shall be submitted along with the grading plan for approval by the City Engineer.

31.3.5. Applicant shall provide written proof and authorization from easement holders (if any) for work proposed over easements.

31.4. If grading is required offsite, the Applicant shall obtain a written notarized letter of authorization from the property owner(s) to grade as necessary and provide a copy to the Engineering Department. It shall be the sole responsibility of the Applicant to obtain any and all proposed or required easements and/or authorizations necessary to perform the grading shown on the site plan and grading exhibits.

31.5. A hauling permit shall be required for the import/export of material using City streets .

The import/export location and the haul route shall be reviewed and approved by the Engineering Department. If the import/export location is outside of City limits , the Applicant shall provide evidence that the jurisdictional agency has provided all necessary approvals for import/export to/from the site.

31.6. Prior to approval of the rough grading plan, the Applicant shall prepare a final hydrology and hydraulics report corresponding with the detailed plans for grading, site development, storm drain improvements, and street improvements, including analysis of offsite drainage tributary to the site, for approval of the City Engineer. The Cit y has reviewed the Preliminary Hydrology Report for TTM 38888, prepared by Adkan Engineers and dated February 14, 2024.

31.6.1. The final hydrology report shall include a flood impact analysis for post development conditions to identify any special considerations for drainage and grading for the proposed units near the RCFC&WCD facility south of the site.

31.6.2. The final hydrology report shall include runoff mitigation for Kirby Drive. Runoff for Kirby Drive shall be directed away from property to the west.

31.7. Prior to the approval of the precise grading plan, the Applicant shall prepare, or cause to be prepared, a Final Water Quality Management Plan (F -WQMP) for TTM38888 in JURUPA 67 DENSITY BONUS SUBDIVISION (TTM38888, SDP23172) FEBRUARY 6, 2025 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MA23357
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XX

Page 9 of 14 ends

conformance with the requirements of RCFC&WCD for the Santa Ana River Watershed for approval of the City Engineer.

31.7.1. The F-WQMP shall provide any changes in pervious/impervious areas and BMPs.

31.7.2. The F-WQMP shall be in accordance with the recommendations of the Final Geotechnical Report.

31.7.3. Any onsite and offsite BMPs shall be designed and sized per the findings of the F-WQMP. Any changes to the proposed BMP sizing, design, and type; and impacts to the referenced exhibit(s), may require additional approvals.

31.8. Post-construction water quality surface features and facilities shall be designed and installed per approved project-specific WQMP and approved by the Engineering Inspector.

31.9. The project proposes to connect the overflow of the proposed Best Management Practice (BMP) to an existing 57-inch storm drain facility owned and maintained by the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFC&WCD). It shall be the sole responsibility of the Applicant to obtain any and all permits/authorizations for the design and construction of the proposed lateral connection to the existing RCFC&WCD facility. If a proposed storm drain connection exceeds the hydraulic performance of the existing drainage facilities, mitigation will be required.

31.10. All flood control and drainage facilities shall be designed and constructed to RCFC&WCD engineering and maintenance standards. The Applicant shall consult with RCFC&WCD early in the design process regarding materials, hydraulic design, regulatory permitting, and transfer of right-of-way.

31.11. For disturbance of one or more acres, the Applicant shall provide evidence that it has prepared and submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The SWRCB issued WDID number shall be included on the face of the grading plan.

31.12. The proposed walls along Lot 6 and 68 shall ensure a clear sight distance in accordance with the FHWA’s ‘Railroad Highway Grade Crossing Handbook’, Section IV, Table 41.

In addition, signage shall comply with the California MUTCD Part 8: Traffic Control for Railroad and Light Rail Transit Grade Crossings. Final details shall be coordinated with Union Pacific Railroad. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, this sight line shall be shown on the plans and shall be in compliance with this condition.

32. PRIOR TO TRACT MAP RECORDATION (ENGINEERING)

32.1. No Final Tract Map shall be recorded until all Planning cases associated with MA23357 are approved, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer.

32.2. After approval of the tentative map and prior to the expiration of said map, the Applicant shall cause the real property included within the tentative map exhibit, or any part thereof, to be surveyed; and a Final Tract Map thereof shall be prepared in accordance JURUPA 67 DENSITY BONUS SUBDIVISION (TTM38888, SDP23172) FEBRUARY 6, 2025 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MA23357
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XX

Page 10 of 14 ends

to the City Engineer’s requirements, conditions of tentative map approval, and in accordance with the provisions of the City of Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Chapter

7.20. All processing shall be through the City of Jurupa Valley.

32.3. All common areas shown on the referenced exhibit shall be designated as numbered lots including lots designated for water quality purposes. Lettered lots shall be reserved for public and private roads and alleys.

32.4. Lot access shall be restricted along the northerly property line abutting the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) right -of-way. The Applicant shall dedicate on the Final Tract Map abutter’s rights of access.

32.5. Applicant shall dedicate the required right-of-way for public street and utility purposes for Camino Real on the Final Tract Map to provide a 50-ft half-width right-of-way along the project frontage, as shown on the referenced exhibit.

32.6. Kirby Drive is a private road and shall be no less than 24 -ft in width. Applicant shall dedicate easement for public utilities and drainage purposes together with the right of ingress and egress for emergency vehicles.

32.7. Interior streets shall be private and be designated as letter lots on the Final Tract Map.

Applicant shall dedicate easements for public utilities and drainage purposes together with the right of ingress and egress for emergency vehicles.

Improvement Plans

32.8. The Applicant shall provide improvement plans for all onsite and offsite improvements including, but not limited to, street improvements, striping and pavement markings, streetlights, landscape and irrigation system, water system, and sanitary sewer system as required in Conditions of approval No. 3.9 through 3.13. All plans shall be prepared in accordance with the Riverside County Transportation Department “Improvement Plan Check Policies and Guidelines” as adopted by the City Engineer. All improvements plans shall be processed through the City for approval of the City Engineer.

32.9. Camino Real is designated as a Secondary Highway in the City’s General Plan Mobility Corridors Map and shall be improved as follows:

32.9.1. Full width pavement improvements from proposed gutter lip to existing AC Dike and striping shall be required from the project’s north boundary to a minimum of 560-ft south of the project’s north boundary.

32.9.2. 18-ft westerly parkway to include 5-ft curb-adjacent landscaped parkway, 5-ft sidewalk, 6-ft decomposed granite trail, 2-ft landscaped parkway, streetlights, curb & gutter, irrigation and landscaping.

32.9.3. A Class III Bike Route shall be provided along the project frontage.

32.9.4. Improvements shall provide appropriate transitions from 460 -ft south of the project’s north boundary to the north limit of the RCFC&WCD spillway. Design of transition shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer.

JURUPA 67 DENSITY BONUS SUBDIVISION (TTM38888, SDP23172) FEBRUARY 6, 2025 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MA23357
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XX

Page 11 of 14 ends

32.9.5. Signing and Striping shall be required along the project frontage.

32.9.6. Roadway widening at the RCFC&WCD spillway will not be required per the applicant-requested concession under the Housing Accountability Act.

32.10. Intersection of Camino Real (NS) and Street “A” (EW) shall be designed as a three - legged intersection and lane configuration shall be as follows:
• Northbound: One through lane and one left-turn lane.
• Southbound: One through lane and one right-turn lane. • Eastbound: One right.
• Westbound: N/A.

3.11.1. Property line corner cut -back and curb return radius shall be per Riverside County Standard No. 805.

32.11. Kirby Driveway (Private Road) shall be improved with stabilized decomposed granite along the project’s frontage. Access to Jurupa Road from adjacent properties shall be provided at all times.

32.12. Streets ‘A’ through ‘E’, inclusive, and Alleys ‘A’ though ‘C’ are internal to the subdivision.

Improvements for the internal private streets shall consist of, but not limited to, pavement, curb & gutter, rolled curb, cross gutters, spandrels, 5 -ft sidewalk s, and streetlights. Road cross -sections, intersection design, and other applicable improvements shall be as approved by the City Engineer.

32.12.1. Street ‘A’ (Private Street) shall be designed and improved to full-width as 36- ft roadway within the 56 -ft private right -of-way, as shown on the referenced exhibits.

32.12.2. Street ‘B’ (Private Street) shall be designed and improved to full-width as 26- ft roadway within the 36 -ft private right -of-way, as shown on the referenced exhibits.

32.12.3. Street ‘C’ through Street ‘E’ (Private Streets), inclusive, shall be improved to full-width as 26-ft roadway within the 36-ft private right-of-way. Street shall be designed to provide a maintenance access road from Alley ‘C’ to Kirby Drive, no less than 20-ft in width. Access road shall be gated.

32.12.4. Alley ‘A’ and Alley ’C’ (Private Streets) shall be designed and improved to full- width as 26-ft roadway within the 26-ft private right-of-way, as shown on the referenced exhibits. No sidewalks shall be provided.

32.12.5. Alley ‘B’ (Private Street) shall be designed and improved to full-width as 20-ft roadway within the 20-ft private right -of-way, as shown on the referenced exhibits. No sidewalks shall be provided.

JURUPA 67 DENSITY BONUS SUBDIVISION (TTM38888, SDP23172) FEBRUARY 6, 2025 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MA23357
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XX

Page 12 of 14 ends

32.13. The construction of ADA compliant depressed curbs and access ramps shall be required as shown in the referenced exhibit.

32.14. Existing utilities within Kirby Drive shall b e placed underground if they fall within the project’s boundary.

L&LMD, CFD, and Special Districts

32.15. Prior to final map recordation, Applicant shall form or annex to if one already exists, a Community Facilities District (CFD) for operation and maintenance purposes of various improvements in the public right -of-way along Camino Real, as approved by the City Engineer. The formation or annexation to a CFD shall be in a manner to be approved by the City Engineer and City Attorney. CFD shall include, but not be limited to, the following:

32.15.1. Landscaping and irrigation;

32.15.2. Graffiti abatement;

32.15.3. Streetlights;

32.15.4. All landscaping, irrigation and maintenance systems shall comply with the “Comprehensive Landscaping Guidelines & Standards” and Riverside County Ordinance No. 859.

32.16. Applicant shall form, or annex to if one already exists, a Community Facilities District (CFD) in order to provide funding for City Public Safety Services. The agreement to form or annex to a CFD for Public Safety Services shall be in a manner to be approved by the City Engineer and City Attorney. Participation in a CFD is intended to fully mitigate the incremental impact of new development on City public safety costs and maintain Should this project be within any assessment/benefit district, the Applicant shall make application for and pay any reapportionment of the assessments or pay the unit fees in the assessment/benefit district.

UTILITIES

32.17. Separate sanitary sewer and domestic water system improvement plans shall be prepared for required improvements for approval of the Jurupa Community Services District (JCSD) and concurrence of the City Engineer. Water system improvement plans showing the locations of fire hydrants (see County Standard 400) off -site and on-site must also be approved by Riverside County Fire Department. Necessary easements for sewer and water systems on -site, as determined by JCSD, shall be shown on the Final Tract Map “to be dedicated by separate instrument”.

32.18. Electrical power, telephone, communication, street lighting, and cable television lines shall be designed to be placed underground in accordance with City of Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Title 7. The Developer is responsible for coordinating the work with the serving utility company. A disposition note describing the above shall be reflected on design improvement plans whenever those plans are required. Written proof confirming JURUPA 67 DENSITY BONUS SUBDIVISION (TTM38888, SDP23172) FEBRUARY 6, 2025 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MA23357
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XX

Page 13 of 14 ends

initiation of the design and/or application or the relocation, issued by the utility company, shall be submitted to the Engineering Department for verification purposes.

33. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT (ENGINEERING)

33.1. All grading and construction of infrastructure improvements within the public and private right-of-way in accordance with the approved plans, the City of Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Chapter 8.70, and all other applicable requirements.

33.2. The Project geotechnical/soils engineer shall provide a Final Grading Certification, certifying to the completion of the grading in conformance with the approved grading plans, the recommendation of the Geotechnical/Soils report approved for this project and the California Building Code.

33.3. A licensed land surveyor or civil engineer shall certify the completion of grading in conformance with the lines and grades shown on the approved grading plans.

33.4. The Project Civil Engineer shall provide Record ("As-built") Drawings of grading and all infrastructure improvements.

33.5. Improvement plans shall be approved by the City Engineer, a site specific improvement agreement shall be signed by the City, and financial securities shall be in place prior to permit issuance.

33.6. The Applicant is responsible for completing construction of all post-construction water quality Best Management Practices (BMPs) facilities and features. These facilities and features shall be operated and maintained by the Homeowner’s Association.

33.7. All utility extensions within the site shall be placed underground unless otherwise specified or allowed by these conditions of approval.

33.7.1. Utility extensions from the mainline or other points of connection within the public right-of-way require that the Applicant obtain an Encroachment Permit from the Engineering Department. The City shall make a final inspection of work to verify that any im pacts that the work might have had to other City owned infrastructure is restored or repaired.

33.8. The proposed walls along Lot 6 and 68 shall ensure a clear sight distance in accordance with the FHWA’s ‘Railroad Highway Grade Crossing Handbook’, Section IV, Table 41.

In addition, signage shall comply with the California MUTCD Part 8: Traffic Control for Railroad and Light Rail Transit Grade Crossings. Final details shall be coordinated with Union Pacific Railroad. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, this sight line shall be shown on the plans and shall be in compliance with this condition.

34. PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT FINAL INSPECTION/ CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (ENGINEERING)

34.1. Prior to the first certificate of occupancy, all improvements within the public and private right-of-way shall be completed and accepted by the City.

34.2. Prior to completion and acceptance of im provements or prior to the final building JURUPA 67 DENSITY BONUS SUBDIVISION (TTM38888, SDP23172) FEBRUARY 6, 2025 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MA23357
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XX

Page 14 of 14 ends

inspection, whichever occurs first and as determined by the City Engineer, assurance of maintenance is r equired by the completion of annexation into the City’s CFD for all applicable improvements specified in these conditions of approval.

34.3. Prior to the first certificate of occupancy, Applicant shall complete the annexation into the City’s CFD for public safety.

34.4. Prior to the first certificate of occupancy, Applicant shall ensure that all streetlights within the public right of way, required from this project, are energized.

34.5. Prior to the first certificate of occupancy, Applicant shall obtain acceptance of applicable improvements by JCSD. Written proof shall be provided to the Engineering Department.

34.6. Prior to the first certificate of occupancy, Applicant shall obtain acceptance of applicable improvements by RCFC&WCD. Written proof shall be provided to the Engineering Department.

34.7. The Applicant shall comply with the provisions of Riverside County Ordinance No. 659 (Development Impact Fees, DIF), as adopted by the City, or later ordinance adopted by the City, which requires the payment of the appropriate fee set forth in the Ordinance in accordance with the fee schedule in effect at the time of the final inspection.

The Applicant hereby agrees that these Conditions of Approval are valid and lawful and binding on the Applicant, and its successors and assigns, and agrees to the Conditions of Approval.

Applicant’s name (Print Form): __________________________________________

Applicant’s name (Signature): ___________________________________________

Date: ________________

ATTACHMENT NO. 3
Staff Report from January 16, 2025 Public Hearing
(without Attachments )
Page | 1

STAFF REPORT
DATE: JANUARY 16, 2025
TO
: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
F
ROM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
BY: JOE PEREZ, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER/COMMUNITY

DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
S
UBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 17.C
P

UBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER APPEAL OF PLANNING
COMMISSION’S DENIAL OF MASTER APPLICATION (MA) NO. 23357:

DENSITY BONUS APPLICATION (DB) NO. 24001, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (TTM) NO. 38888 , AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT (SDP) NO. 23172, AND ADDENDUM TO MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
FOR A SUBDIVISION OF 6.92 ACRES OF LAND INTO 67 LOTS FOR SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED HOMES; LOCATION: 7586 JURUPA ROAD (APN:183-030-014; (APPLICANT: WARMINGTON RESIDENTIAL)
RE

COMMENDATION
That the City Council provide direction to staff to bring back a resolution:
1) Rescinding the Planning Commission’s denial of the project and approving the project and adopting Addendum to Mitigated Negative Declaration; or 2) Rescinding the Planning Commission’s denial of the project and approving the project but denying the waivers regarding the one story and landscape requirements set forth in Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Section 9.240.550(E)(3) and Section

9.240.550(E)(13), and adopting Addendum to Mitigated Negative Declaration; or 3) Rescinding the Planning Commission’s denial of the project and approving the project but denying the waivers regarding the landscape requirement s set forth in Section

9.240.550(E)(13), and adopting Addendum to Mitigated Negative Declaration; or 4) Upholding the Planning Commission’s denial of the project.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed project is a subdivision of 6.92 acres of land into sixty-seven (67) lots for single-family detached homes. The average lot size is approximately 3,036 square feet.

The proposed single -family homes would be two-story and range from 1,735 to 2,039 square feet in floor area. The proposed development would also include the following site improvements:

RETURN TO AGENDA
Page | 2

1. Residential amenities including open play areas, playground, covered BBQ area, dog park;

2. Private street improvements individual lot and streetscape landscaping; and

3. Decorative walls and fencing.

The proposed project will require approval of the following entitlements:

1. Tentative Tract Map (TTM) No. 38888: To subdivide the 6.92 acres site into sixty- seven (67) lots for single-family detached homes, common areas, and private streets.

2. Site Development Permit (SDP) No. 23172 : For detached single-family residential subdivisions that exceed a density of two (2) units per acre.

3. Density Bonus: To allow a 20% bonus in density from fifty-six (56) units to sixty-seven (67) units , one incentive/concession, and approval of waiver of development standards.

EXHIBIT A: PROJECT LOCATION

STATE DENSITY BONUS LAW (CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 65915-65918)
Per State Density Bonus Law (SDBL) found in Government Code Section 65915-65918, residential projects that provide on- site affordable housing qualify for an increase to the maximum density allowed by local law. In addition to an increase in density, these projects qualify for waivers, reductions in parking requirements, and incentives and concessions.

Page | 3

The project proposes to offer three (3) homes for sale at a rate affordable to very low - income households. Per SDBL, these three (3) homes make up more than five (5) percent of the base units, which make the project eligible for a twenty (20) percent increase in density, one (1) concession or incentive, and an unlimited number of waivers.

The project site is 6.92 acres in size and is allowed a maximum of eight dwelling units per acre, which results in a maximum of 55.36 dwelling units under local law. This is referred to as “base density.” Per SDBL, this base density calculation can be rounded up to the nearest whole number resulting in a base density of fifty-six (56) base units for this project.

Three (3) of those fifty-six (56) units will be offered at a very low-income affordability rate which results in 5.3% very low income affordable units. Per SDBL, this project qualifies for a twenty percent density bonus. A twenty percent increase from the base 56 units, results in 67.2 units. Again, per SDBL this number can be rounded up to the nearest whole number resulting in a total unit count of sixty -eight (68) units that are allowed to be constructed on this site per SDBL. Although sixty-eight (68) units are allowed on the site, only sixty-seven (67) units are proposed.

Per SDBL, the proposed project ’s five (5) percent very low income homes also entitles the project to receive one (1) incentive or concession and an unlimited number of waivers.

Applicable to this project, incentives and concessions are defined as (1) a reduction in site development standards or a modification of zoning code requirements or architectural design requirements that exceed the minimum building standards approved by the California Building Standards Commission, including, but not limited to, a reduction in setback and square footage requirements and in the ratio of vehicular parking spaces that would otherwise be required that results in identifiable and actual cost reductions, to provide for affordable housing costs, and (2) other regulatory incentives or concessions proposed by the developer or the City, that result in identifiable and actual cost reductions to provide for affordable housing costs. The proposed project has formally applied the only allowed concession/incentive to offsite improvements requested by the City.

If any City development standard would physically prevent the project from being built at the permitted density and with the granted concession/incentive, the developer may utilize a waiver to have the development standard waived or reduced. The City is not permitted to apply any development standard, which physically precludes the project from being built at the permitted increased (bonus) density. The proposed project deviates from many of the development standards applicable to the project per Chapter 9.100. (R-4 Zone) and Section 9.240.550. (Traditional Neighborhood Design) because implementation and adherence to said development standards would preclude the proposed project from being built at the target sixty-seven (67) units.

SINGLE-STORY HOMES
Specifically, Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Section 9.240.550(E)(3) provides that “(a) The number of lots within the subdivision with two (2) story dwellings shall not exceed twenty- five (25) percent; (b) No two (2) story dwelling may be located on a lot adjacent to another two (2) story dwelling; and (c) No two (2) story dwellings may be located on a corner lot.

The imposition of these standards would not preclude the construction of 67 units on the project site. The applicant could still construct 67 units on the project site, it would just Page | 4

need to have 75% of those lots be one story, with no two -story homes located next to each other or on corner lots.

LANDSCAPING
Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Section 9.240.550(E)(13) provides that “(b) The front yard setback area shall be landscaped and include a minimum of one (1) thirty -six-inch box canopy tree. The rear yard setback shall be landscaped. Ninety (90) percent of the required lot open space shall be landscaped. ” The imposition of these standards would not preclude the construction of 67 units on the project site. The applicant could still construct 67 units that comply with the required tree size, rear yard setback landscaping, and ninety (90) percent required landscaping.

PROJECT LOCATION AND SURROUNDING AREA
The project site is located on the southwest corner of Jurupa Road and Camino Real at 7586 Jurupa Road. The site is surrounded by single-family homes to the north, northeast, southwest and southeast. Patriot High School is located to the northwest, and Camino Real Elementary School is located to the south. To the east is Centennial Park . Table 1 outlines the General Plan land use designation, zone classifications, and current uses that surround the project site. Exhibit A (page 2) shows the project location.

Table 1: Project Information and Surrounding Land Uses
Location Current
Land Use
General Plan
Land Use Designation Zoning
Project Site Vacant land MHDR (Medium High Density
Residential)
R-4 (Planned
Residential)
North
 Single Family
Residential
 Patriot High School

• MDR (Medium Density Residential)
• PF (Public Facility/Institutional)
• R-1 (Single
Family
Detached)
• R-A (Residential
Agricultural)
South
 Single Family
Residential
 Camino Real
Elementary School
LDR (Low Density Residential)
 A-1 (Light
Agriculture)
 R-A (Residential
Agricultural)
 R-1 (Single
Family
Detached)
East
 Single Family
Residential
 Open Space
 Centennial Park
 OS-R (Open Space, Recreation
 CR (Commercial Retail)
 MDR (Medium Density Residential)
 A-1 (Light
Agriculture)
 R-A (Residential
Agricultural)
West Single Family
Residential LDR (Low Density Residential)
 A-1 (Light
Agriculture)
 R-A (Residential
Agricultural)

Page | 5

PROJECT DESIGN AND SITE LAYOUT
Overall Plan.

The proposed project is a sixty-seven (67) unit single-family subdivision of two (2) story single-family detached homes with lot sizes ranging from 1,735 to 2,039 square feet in area, with an average lot size of 3,036 square feet. See Exhibit B, page 5, for proposed Site Plan.

Single-Family Home Design . All sixty-seven (67) homes are proposed to be two-story.

The homes would be available in three (3) floor plans ranging in size, and number of bedrooms. The three (3) plans are summarized below. Table 3 , page 5, provides additional information regarding the three (3) proposed floor plans. • P lan 1 is a three (3) bed, two and a half (2.5) bath home with option for a f ourth bedroom. The home is two (2) stories and 1,735 square feet in size. This plan includes a two (2) car garage, front porch, loft, laundry room, and master suite with a walk -in closet.
• P lan 2 is a four (4) bed, two and a half (2.5) bath, two (2) story home of 2,028 square feet in size. This plan includes a two (2) car garage, front porch, walk -in pantry, loft, laundry room, and master suite with a walk-in closet.
• P lan 3 is a three (3) bed, two and a half (2.5) bath, two (2) story home with option for a fourth and fifth bedroom, and an option for three (3) full bathrooms. This plan includes a two (2) car garage, walk-in pantry, bedroom and half bathroom on the first floor. Second floor amenities include two (2) loft areas (depending on bedroom option), laundry room, and master suite with walk-in closet.

EXHIBIT B: PROPOSED SITE PLAN

Page | 6

Table 3: Home Plan Summary
Plan
No.

Storie
s
Floor
Area
Bed/Bath Height Lots Total
1 2 1,735 SF 3 Bed/2.5
Bath 25.5 ft
2,4,9,11,13,18,21,27,30,33
,36,39,41,45,48,51,54,58,6
1,64,67
21 2 2 2,028 SF 4 Bed/2.5
Bath 25 ft
3,5,8,10,12,15,17,19,22,25
,28,31,34,37,40,42,46,49,5
2,55,57,60,63,66
24 3 2 2,039 SF 3 Bed/2.5
Bath 28.5 ft
1,6,7,14,16,20,23,24,26,29
,32,35,38,43,44,47,50,53,5
6,59,62,65
22 Open Space and Recreational Amenities. The proposed project includes 14,541 square feet of common recreation and open space area. Exhibit C presents the three common recreation areas that are located throughout the project site. These three open space areas include the following amenities:
• Open space play area that accommodates passive play opportunities and small-scale activities.
• Barbecue areas with covered picnic tables, freestanding bar becues, hot coal containers, and trash containers. Exhibit D presents these amenities. • Tot Lot with rubber surfacing and play structures and equipment for various age groups. See Exhibit E for the proposed play structures and equipment. • Dog park with artificial turf and dog waste station.

EXHIBIT C: OPEN SPACE/RECREATIONAL AREAS
Open Space A

Page | 7

Open Space B

Open Space C

EXHIBIT D: OPEN SPACE/RECREATIONAL AREA AMENITIES/EQUIPMENT

EXHIBIT E: PROPOSED TOT LOT EQUIPMENT

Page | 8

Access, Circulation, and Parking. The development is proposed to have one access point from Camino Real to internal private Street “A.” All internal streets are private and would be maintained by the homeowner’s association. Street “A” provides access into an interior loop of streets (Streets B, C, D, and E) that provides internal circulation. These internal streets provide pedestrian and vehicular access to three (3) private alleys (Alleys A, B, and C). The internal loop of streets and alleys provides access to all single-family home lots.

The main project entrance where Street “A” meets Camino Real, would include decorative stamped asphalt paving, decorative block walls, three (3) rail vinyl fencing, wall mounted identification sign, and abundant landscaping. All private interior streets would be publicly accessible. This is not a gated community. The interior private streets range between thirty-six (36) and fifty-six (56) feet in width. Street A is fifty-six (56) feet wide with six (6) sidewalks and four (4) foot landscape strips on both sides. Street B, C, D, and E are thirty- six (36) feet wide with five (5) foot-wide sidewalks on either side. All alleys are twenty-six (26) feet wide. Decorative streetlighting would be placed throughout the community and along the project frontage on Camino Real. Further details of right-of-way improvements are described in the Right-of-Way Improvements subsection further below.

All homes would incorporate driveways leading up to two -car att ached garages. In addition, seventeen (17) parking spaces inclusive of one (1) ADA parking spaces are provided adjacent to the northern open space lot for guest , deliveries, and users of the open space lot.

Pedestrian circulation elements include six (6) foot wide sidewalks at the project entry and five (5) foot wide sidewalks throughout the project site. These sidewalks connect the single-family homes to all open space/recreational areas. Sidewalk access would also connect to a new offsite public multipurpose trail with landscaping along Camino Real to connect residents to nearby schools, parks , and other community amenities. The proposed sidewalks for the interior block of homes creates the opportunity for recreation by also serving as a walking l oop that is located adjacent to front yards and through the open space/recreational area that’s located at the project entrance.

Landscaping. Landscaping would be installed throughout the proposed project. The plan includes twenty-five (25) trees ranging from sixty (60) inch box to twenty -four (24) inch box that are dispersed throughout the three (3) proposed open space/recreational areas.

Page | 9

Along the interior streets and alleys , s eventy-three ( 73) 2 4-inch box trees would be provided, many of which would also serve as front yard trees for the proposed homes.

Along Camino Real, eight (8 ) thirty-six (36) inch box Coast Live Oak trees would be provided as part of the project frontage, which are part of a landscaped front entry feature that is proposed to include decorative shrubs and ground cover plants that range from one (1) to five (5) gallons in size.

Architecture and Building Design . The project proposes three (3) architectural styles.

They are California Bungalow, American Farmhouse, and California Ranch . Exhibit G illustrates the three (3) proposed architectural styles. The proposed project includes the following architectural standards.
• Three (3) different floor plans each with three ( 3) different architectural styles that incorporate defining architectural features to create variety and interest in the neighborhood.
• Streets that incorporate multiple architectural styles and are diverse as to form, massing, features, windows, front doors, materials, and colors. • Design articulation that includes articulation of building facades, variation of rooflines, balance of ro of form, and changes in vertical and horizontal plane to create visual interest and avoid monotonous patterns.
• Varying roof materials, colors, and pitches of adjacent homes to create a variety of silhouettes and ridge heights.
• Garages are designed to de-emphasize the storage of vehicles and achieves an attractive street scene by incorporating varying architectural treatments that include trellises, corbels, windows, and arches.
• Window treatments would be applied to all sides of the home and include decorative trim and accent shutters in certain architectural styles. • A mixture of colors, textures, and building materials that are representative of the architectural style and are distinctive from adjacent homes to promote variation. • Exterior walls that incorporate accent materials appropriate to their architectural style.

Page | 10

EXHIBIT G: PROPOSED ELEVATIONS
PLAN 1 WITH CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW STYLE

PLAN 1 WITH AMERICAN FARMHOUSE STYLE

Page | 11

PLAN 1 WITH CALIFORNIA RANCH STYLE

Walls and Fences. The wall and fences for the development would be made of decorative materials to be compatible with the overall architectural character of the development and surrounding neighborhoods. Details on the walls and fences are contained in the Development Plan (Attachment 3). A summary of the proposed fences and walls is as follows:
• Site Perimeter – 6-feet high single-sided split-faced block wall with split-face wall cap and twelve (12) inch pilasters.
• C amino Real :
o 6- feet high single-sided split-faced block wall with split-face wall cap and twelve (12) inch pilasters.
o 4- foot high three (3) rail vinyl fence.
• Yard Fence
o Visible from public right-of-way – 6-feet high single-sided split-faced block wall with split-face wall cap and twelve (12) inch pilasters. o Not visible from public right-of-way – six (6) foot high vinyl fence. o Six-foot high, three-foot wide vinyl gate for each home. • Open Space/Recreation Area: 6-feet high double- sided split -faced block wall with split-face wall cap and twelve (12) inch pilasters.
• Dog P ark : 4-foot-high tubular steel fence.

Because the project site sits about six (6) feet higher than the adjacent property to the south, the eastern portion of the six (6) foot high single- sided split face block wall proposed on the southern property line of the project site is proposed to be mounted on

Page | 12

top of a six (6) foot, seven (7) inch high retaining wall. Exhibit F below illustrates the proposed grades, and the retaining wall proposed at this location. The six (6) foot high freestanding block wall is a standard wall height for residential projects. The six (6) foot, seven (7) inch difference in grade is required to effectively manage drainage of the community. Collectively, the retaining/freestanding wall would be twelve (12) foot, seven (7) inches high and would face the northern area of the adjacent Camino Real Elementary School. This area of the school campus contains a driveway, walking path, and open space.

EXHIBIT F: SOUTHEAST RETAINING WALL

ANALYSIS
I. BACKGROUND OF MADONE COLLECTION PROJECT . In 2022, the City Council approved Master Application No. 21143 (MA21143) for General Plan Amendment (GPA) No. 21003, Change of Zone (CZ) No. 21004, Tentative Tract Map (TTM) No. 3815, and Site Development Permit (SDP) No. 22089 for a single- family home s ubdivision known as the Madone Collection Planned Residential Development. The approved project consisted of the subdivision of 6.92 acres of land into thirty -five (35) lots for single- family detached homes. The community included single and two- story homes, open play areas, walking trails, exercise stations, tot lot, gazebo, barbeque area, picnic benches and seating areas, private street improvements individual lot and streetscape landscaping, retention basin, and walls and fencing. The following entitlements were approved as part of this project. Exhibit H provides the approved Site Plan.

A. The approved General Plan Amendment (GPA) changed the General Plan Land Use Designation from Country Neighborhood (LDR) which allows two (2) dwelling units per acre to Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) which allows for eight (8) dwelling units per acre or more.

Page | 13

B. The approved Change of Zone (CZ) changed the zoning designation from Light Agriculture (A-1) to Planned Development (R-4).

C. The approved Site Development Perm it (SDP) was to allow thirty -five-unit single-family homes subject to the Traditional Neighborhood Design Standards.

D. The approved Tentative Tract Map (TTM) was to subdivide 6.92 acres into thirty-five (35) lots for single -family detached homes, common areas, and private streets.

Construction of the approved project was not pursued, and the site remains vacant and undisturbed.

EXHIBIT H: MA21143 APPROVED SITE PLAN

II. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW. A Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) was adopted along with the approval of Master Application No. 21143 (MA21143). The MND was supported by an Initial Study that evaluated potential environmental effects of the Project. The MND determined that the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment. However, mitigation measures contained in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) and revisions to the project were imposed to mitigate the impacts and reduce the project ’s environmental effect to less than significant. A copy of the MA21143 MMRP is provided as Attachment 4.

The City determined that there are no substantial changes to the Madone Collection project approved as MA21143 or the circumstances under which the proposed project, MA23357, will be undertaken that will require major revisions to the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) approved as part of MA21143.

Therefore, the previously adopted MND is adequate upon completion of an Addendum.

Page | 14

Under CEQA, the lead agency or a responsible agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously certified Mitigated Negative Declaration if some changes or additions are necessary to the prior MND, but none of the conditions calling for preparation of a subsequent or supplemental MND have occurred (Public Resources Code Section 21166; CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15164).

Once a MND has been certified, no supplement or subsequent MND shall be prepared unless the lead agency or responsible agency determines that a specific condition has been met as required by CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a)(1), (2), and (3).

An addendum to the adopted MND was completed for this project and is as attached as Attachment 1A. As a recommended Condition of Approval for this project, the mitigation measures provided in the addendum shall be implemented and adhered to. A copy of the MMRP is provided as Attachment 1A.

III. GENERAL PLAN. The project is consistent with the General Plan.

A. Land Use Designation. The project site has a General Plan land use designation of Medium High Density Residential (MHDR). MHDR allows for a maximum density of eight (8) dwelling units per acre . Because of the proposed twenty (20) percent density increase allotted for this project, the proposed project has a proposed density of 9. 68 dwelling units per acre.

Although the proposed density is higher than the maximum eight (8) dwelling units per acre allowed in the MHDR land use, the density proposed is a result of the twenty (20) percent increase of dwelling units afforded to this project under the State Density Bonus Law. Without the implementation of State Density Bonus Law, the proposed project ’s base density of 55.36 dwelling units (rounded up to 56) is consistent with the MHDR land use designation. The proposed project is also consistent with the General Plan’s encouragement of smaller lot, single- family dwellings. The project demonstrates consistency with the residential section of the Land Use Element of the General Plan including the following policies:
• LUE 2.2 Higher Density Residential. Accommodate higher density residential development in walkable, pedestrian oriented areas near major transportation corridors, concentrated employment areas, and community and town centers, and promote the development of high- quality apartments and condominiums that will encourage local investment and pride of ownership.

The proposed project is for a higher density residential development in a pedestrian orient ed area near an elementary school ( Camino Real Elementary School) and would provide a high-quality residential project that would create pride of ownership and can encourage local investment.
• LUE 2.3 Infrastructure. Ensure that circulation facilities, water resources, sewer and storm drainage facilities, and other utilities available or provided by the developer are adequate to meet the Page | 15

demands of a proposed residential land use in addition to those services and resources required to serve existing resident s and businesses.

All street improvements, drainage infrastructure, and other utilities are found to be adequate to meet the demands of a proposed residential land use in addition to those services and resources required to serve existing residents.
• LUE 2. 4 Housing Quality and Variety. Accommodate the development of a variety of highest quality housing types, styles and densities that are accessible to and meet the needs of a range of lifestyles, physical abilities, and income levels.

The project introduces a varied high quality housing type that allows for diverse housing styles and a higher density to meet the needs of people with distinct lifestyles and income levels.
• LUE 2.5 Connectivity. Integrate residential development with a continuous network of parks, open space, public areas, bicycle trails, equestrian trails, public transit routes, and pedestrian paths to connect neighborhoods and communities with key nodes. Key nodes include parks and recreation facilities, schools, town and neighborhood center s, and other in- city communities and surrounding cities and points of interest.

The project provides open space, public areas, and improves a pedestrian path near an existing elementary school ( Camino Real Elementary School).
• LUE 2.9 Design Compatibility. Ensure that the new residential developments are designed to be compatible with their surroundings and to enhance visually the appearance of neighborhoods and adjacent structures.

The proposed project successfully incorporates California Bungalow, American Farmhouse, and California Ranch architectural styles that are compatible with the surrounding area.
• LUE 10.9 Promote Unique Community Character. Use community plans to promote the development and preservation of unique communities in which each community exhibits a special sense of place and quality of design.

The proposed project would provide a unique community that exhibits a special sense of place with high quality design. • LUE 11.1 Small Town Character. Protect and enhance Jurupa Valley’s small- town character, maintain or improve walkability, provide bike and equestrian trails, and social connectivity and “sense of place.”
Page | 16

The project would improve walkability along Camino Real and introduces an area for social connectivity all while creating a sense of place in the neighborhood.
• LUE 13.1 Fair Share Infrastructure Funding. Require that new development contribute its fair share to fund infrastructure and public facilities, such as police and fire facilities, parks, streets, a nd trail improvements.

The applicant would be required to contribute over $490 ,000 in Development Impact Fees (DIFs) which would be allocated to fund fire services, roads, parks, schools, libraries, and other public facilities.

IV. Title 7 – SUBDIVISIONS. The proposed Tentative Tract Map (TTM) No. 38888 complies with all applicable provisions of Title 7 and the Subdivision Map Act. The Engineering Department has reviewed the project for required travel lanes, access, circulation, traffic impacts, grading, and d rainage. The recommended conditions address areas such as subdivision, circulation, access, grading, drainage, and water quality.

A. Improvement Plans. The applicant shall be responsible for on-site and off- site improvements including street improvements, storm drain/drainage improvements, signing, striping and pavement markings, streetlights, landscape and irrigation systems, water systems, and sanitary sewer systems.

Right-of-Way Improvements.
• Camino Real. Camino Real is designated as a Secondary Highway in the City ’s General Plan Mobility Corridors Map. Camino Real is proposed to be improved with full width pavement improvements from the proposed gutter lip to the existing AC Dike. Signing and Striping will be required along the pr oject frontage. The applicant would be required to improve the eighteen (18) foot westerly parkway to include a two (2) foot wide landscaping strip adjacent to the sites six (6) foot high decorative block wall, a six (6) foot wide decomposed granite multipurpose trail, a five (5) foot wide sidewalk , and a three (3) foot wide landscaping planter adjacent to curb. Exhibit I illustrates the proposed street. Additionally, the project would include the following improvements:

1. A Class III Bike Route shall be prov ided along the project frontage to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

2. Improvements shall provide appropriate transitions from Camino Real Elementary School’s driveways to the proposed infrastructure. Design of transition shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer.

Page | 17

EXHIBIT I: CAMINO REAL CROSS-SECTION

• Kirby Driveway (Private Road). Kirby Driveway shall be improved with stabilized decomposed granite to the satisfaction of the City Engineer along the project’s frontage.
• Interior Private Streets.

1. Street “A”. Street A would have a fifty-six (56) foot-wide right of way width with one eighteen (18) foot wide travel lane in each direction with a six (6) foot sidewalk adjacent to curb and four (4) foot wide landscape planter. On- street parking is not permitted on either side of the street. Exhibit J illustrates the proposed street.

EXHIBIT J: STREET “A”

2. Streets “B”, “C”, “D”, and “E”. Streets B through E w ould have a thirty -six (36) foot wide right of way width with one thirteen (13) floor wide travel lane in each direction with a five- foot (5) wide sidewalk adjacent to curb. No landscaping is incorporated as a part of the right-of-way. On-street parking is not permitted on either side of the street. Exhibits K illustrates the proposed streets.

Page | 18

EXHIBIT K: PRIVATE STREETS “B”, “C”, “D”, & “E” CROSS-SECTION

• Interior Private Alleys. Interior Alleys “A” through “C” have an ultimate right-of-way width of twenty-six (26) feet with twelve (12) foot drive aisles. No parking is permitted in alleys. Exhibit L illustrated the proposed alleys.

EXHIBIT L: PRIVATE ALLEYS “A”, “B”, & “C” CROSS-SECTION

V. Title 9 – Zoning Ordinance.

A. Chapter 9.100. R-4 Zone (Planned Residential). The Planned Residential (R-4) Zone allows for single- family detached and multifamily projects that include open areas for recreation purposes and/or preservation of the rural character of the area.

The proposed project meets the land use regulations of the R -4 zone with the exception of minimum lot size, lot width, lot depth, front yard setback,

Page | 19

side yard, and rear yard setback. Table 4 outlines all R-4 zone requirements that the project does not comply with.

Per State Density Bonus Law, the proposed project may qualify for an unlimited number o f waivers if the imposition of a development standard would have the effect of physically precluding the construction of the project at the density proposed or with the incentive/concession. Said waivers may allow deviations from R-4 development standards listed above.

Per Chapter 9.100, the proposed project requires the concurrent processing and approval of a Development Plan. The Development Plan for the proposed project outlines the overall project design and provides details on floor plans, architecture, walls, fences, and open space.

Table 4: Compliance With Section 9.100.040 (R-4 Zone Land Use Regulations)
Land Use Regulation Compliance Waiver Request
The minimum overall area for
each dwelling unit, exclusive of
the area used for commercial
purposes and area set aside for
street rights-of-way, but including
recreation and service areas
shall be six thousand (6,000)
square feet.

No. Lots range from
2,498 square feet to
5,044 square feet.

The average lot size
is 3,036 square feet.

Waiver
requested per
SDBL.

The minimum lot area for the
individual lots used as a
residential building site shall be
three thousand, five hundred
(3,500) square feet.

No. Only six (6) of
the sixty-seven (67)
lots are larger than
3,500 square feet.

The remaining lots
range from 2,498
square feet to 3,436
square feet.

Waiver
requested per
SDBL.

The minimum width of each lot
shall be forty (40) feet
No. Although two (2)
of the sixty-seven
(67) are wider than
forty (40) feet, the
remaining lots range
from approximately
thirty (30) feet to
thirty-eight and a
half (38.5) feet wide.

Waiver
requested per
SDBL.

The minimum depth shall be
eighty (80) feet.

No. Four (4) of the
sixty-seven (67) lots
Waiver
requested per
SDBL.

Page | 20

are less than eighty
(80) feet in depth.

Table 4: Compliance With Section 9.100.040 (R-4 Zone Land Use Regulations)
Land Use Regulation Compliance Waiver Request
One (1) family residences shall
not exceed forty (40) feet in
height. No other building or
structure shall exceed fifty (50)
feet in height, unless a greater
height is approved pursuant
to Section 9.240.370. In no
event, however, shall a building
or structure exceed seventy-five
(75) feet in height, unless a
variance is approved pursuant
to Section 9.240.270.

Yes. The tallest
home is twenty-
eight and a half
(28.5) feet high.

None.

The front yard shall be not less
than twenty (20) feet, measured
from the existing right-of-way as
shown on any Specific Plan of
Highways, whichever is nearer
the proposed structure.

No. With the
exception of one lot,
front yard setbacks
range from fifteen
(15) feet to eighteen
(18) feet, eight (8)
inches.

Waiver
requested per
SDBL.

Side yards on interior and
through lots shall be not less
than a width of five (5) feet. Side
yard on corner and reversed
corner lots shall be not less than
ten (10) feet from the existing
right-of-way or from any future
right-of-way as shown on any
Specific Plan of Highways,
whichever is nearer the
proposed structure.

No. Most lots
provide four (4) foot
side yards.

Waiver
requested per
SDBL.

The rear yard shall not be less
than ten (10) feet.

No. Three (3) of the
sixty-seven (67) lots
are less than ten
(10) feet.

Waiver
requested per
SDBL.

Page | 21

No structural encroachments
shall be permitted in the front,
side or rear yard except as
provided for
in Section 9.240.180
No. The homes
encroach into the
required setbacks.

Waiver
requested per
SDBL.

Off-street parking shall be
provided as set forth in Section

9.240.120.

Yes. Each home
provides two (2)
parking spaces
within a garage.

None.

Individual sewage disposal
systems shall not be permitted
on lots containing an area of less
than one-half (½) acre unless a
report has been received by the
Planning Commission from the
Riverside County Department of
Environmental Health stating
that such a system will be
acceptable.

Yes. There is no
individual sewage
disposal system
being proposed.

None.

Table 4: Compliance With Section 9.100.040 (R-4 Zone Land Use Regulations)
Land Use Regulation Compliance Waiver Request
The recreation areas shall be of
a size, based on the particular
use, adequate to meet the needs
of the anticipated population,
and shall be arranged so as to
be readily accessible to the
residents of the subdivision.

Yes. Recreational
areas are provided
throughout the
community.

None.

Adequate and permanent
access from a public street to
each family dwelling shall be
provided for pedestrians and
emergency vehicles.

Yes. Permanent
access from Camino
Real to all homes is
provided.

None.

B. Section 9.240.550 (Traditional Neighborhood Design). Traditional Neighborhood Design is intended to establish design and development standards for new single-family residential subdivisions that have a density greater than two dwelling units per acre to create traditional neighborhoods that preserve the small -town character of the community. As such, the proposed project is subject to the Traditional Neighborhood Design requirements as set forth in Section 9.240.550 of the Municipal Code.

Page | 22

The proposed project does not meet all the requirements of Section

9.240.550 (Traditional Neighborhood Design) of the Municipal Code.

Compliance with many of the Development Standards required per Section

9.240.550 would result in a project that provides less than the sixty-seven (67) units allotted on the site. Per the SDBL, the applicant may use a waiver to deviate from a development standard if adherence to such development standard would result in a project that provides less than the target number of units. The proposed project qualifies for unlimited waivers per the SDBL.

Table 5 outlines all Traditional Neighborhood Design Development Standards that the project does not comply with. Adherence to the majority of the development standards set for th below would reduce the number of units on the site. However, the applicant could still construct a project with 67 units and comply with the requirement that no more than 25% of the homes be two story, and that no two story lots be located next to each other or on a corner lot . The applicant could also construct the 67 units with the required thirty-six (36) inch box tree in the front yard, the required rear yard landscaping, and provide ninety (90) percent landscaping in the open space.

Table 5: Compliance to Section 9.240.550(E) (Traditional Neighborhood Design Development Standards)
Land Use Regulation Compliance Waiver Request
Lot area. The minimum lot area
is as required under the
applicable zone classification for
the subject property(s).

No. The minimum
lot size requirement
in the R-4 is 3,500
square feet. Only six
(6) of the sixty-
seven (67) lots are
larger than 3,500
square feet. The
remaining 61 lots
range from 2,498
square feet to 3,436
square feet.

Waiver
requested per
SDBL.

Building height. Single-family
residence shall not exceed thirty-
five (35) feet in height and more
than two (2) stories pursuant to
the following:

Yes. Homes do not
exceed thirty-five
(35) feet in height.

None.
(a) The number of lots within the
subdivision with two (2) story
dwellings shall not exceed
twenty-five (25) percent;
No. All sixty-seven
(67) homes are
proposed at two (2)
stories.

Waiver
requested per
SDBL.

Page | 23

(b) No two (2) story dwelling may
be located on a lot adjacent to
another two (2) story dwelling;
and
No. All two (2) story
homes are adjacent
to one another.

Waiver
requested per
SDBL.
(c) No two (2) story dwellings
may be located on a corner lot.

No. All corner lots
have two (2) story
home.

Waiver
requested per
SDBL.

Floor area ratio. The maximum
FAR for a one (1) story dwelling,
including the garage, shall not
exceed 0.40.

N/A. All homes are
two (2) story.

N/A
The maximum FAR for the
ground floor of a two (2) story
dwelling, including the garage,
shall not exceed 0.25.

No. All lots have a
1st story FAR of
more than .25.

Average FAR for the
1st story is .42.

Waiver
requested per
SDBL.

The maximum FAR for the
second floor of a two (2) story
dwelling shall not exceed 0.15.

No. All lots have a
second story FAR of
more than .15.

Average FAR for
second story is .39.

Waiver
requested per
SDBL.

Open space. Not less than fifty
(50) percent of the lot area shall
be permeable open space.

No. Only fourteen
(14) homes have
more than fifty (50)
percent permeable
open space.

Waiver
requested per
SDBL.

Table 5: Compliance to Section 9.240.550(E) (Traditional Neighborhood Design Development Standards)
Land Use Regulation Compliance Waiver Request

Not less than ninety (90) percent
of the required open space area
shall be landscaped.

No. The applicant
proposes to
landscape only the
front yard of each
lot.

Waiver
requested per
SDBL. .

Driveways to garages located in
the rear half (½) of the lot shall
not be included in the permeable
open space calculation.

N/A. All garages are
proposed on the
front half of the lot.

N/A
Page | 24

Setbacks. Provide useable open
space areas with generous
street side setbacks that
enhance the visual appearance
of the street parkway pursuant to
the following:
(a) Front yard. Minimum twenty
(20) foot front year setback.

Front yard setbacks are required
to vary in length, it is encouraged
that there be an average front
yard setback of twenty-five (25)
for the entire subdivision.

No. With the
exception of one lot,
front yard setbacks
range from fifteen
(15) feet to eighteen
(18) feet, eight (8)
inches.

Waiver
requested per
SDBL.
(b) Front yard covered
porches. Minimum fifteen (15)
foot setback for front yard
covered porches that are a depth
of eight (8) feet or more and one
hundred (100) square feet or
greater in area.

Yes. All porches are
set back more than
fifteen (15) feet.

None.
(c) Side yard, interior. Minimum
six (6) foot or not less than ten
(10) percent of the lot width,
whichever is the greater setback.

No. Most side yards
are proposed to be
four (4) feet.

Waiver
requested per
SDBL.
(d) Side yard, street
facing. Minimum ten (10) foot
setback.

No. Only one (1)
street facing side
yard is more than
ten (10) feet wide.

Waiver
requested per
SDBL.
(e) Rear yard. Minimum of a
twenty (20) foot setback.

No. Only eight (8)
lots have rear yards
that are a minimum
of twenty (20) feet.

Waiver
requested per
SDBL.

Table 5: Compliance to Section 9.240.550(E) (Traditional Neighborhood Design Development Standards)
Land Use Regulation Compliance Waiver Request
(f) Garage attached. Street
facing garages shall be a
minimum ten (10) foot setback
from the front building line of the
dwelling and shall be side facing
No. All garages are
not set back ten (10)
feet from the front
building line.

Waiver
requested per
SDBL.

Page | 25

in the front half of the lot. Side
entry garages minimum of
twenty-foot front yard setback.
(g) Garage, detached. Zero (0)
interior side and rear yard
setbacks. Minimum five (5) foot
rear yard setback for a garage
that faces an alley.

N/A. No detached
garages are
proposed.

N/A
Garages. Garages attached or
detached shall be a secondary
feature of the home. Garages
facing the street shall be located
in the rear half (½) of the lot.

No. All garages are
located within the
front half of the lot.

Waiver
requested per
SDBL.

Corner lot garages shall not face
the street side yard.

Yes. Corner lot
garages do not face
side yard.

None.

Off-street parking and
driveways.
(a) A minimum of two (2)
covered garage spaces per
dwelling unit.

Yes. Two (2)
covered spaces are
provided per
dwelling unit.

None.
(b) Minimum forty-five (45) feet
between driveway curb cuts to
accommodate two (2) on-street
parking spaces between
driveways.

No. Less than forty-
five (45) feet is
being proposed in
between driveways.

The space between
driveways ranges
from approximately
thirteen (13) feet to
approximately
twenty-two (22) feet.

Waiver
requested per
SDBL.

One (1) driveway curb cut per
lot. At the discretion of the Public
Works and Community
Development Directors, shorter
distances between driveway cuts
on cul-de-sacs can be approved.

Yes. One (1)
driveway curb cut is
proposed per lot.

None.

Table 5: Compliance to Section 9.240.550(E) (Traditional Neighborhood Design Development Standards)
Page | 26

Land Use Regulation Compliance Waiver Request
Streets.
(a) Street layout. Interior streets
shall connect to the internal
streets of existing, adjacent
neighborhoods, schools,
commercial centers, civic
buildings, and parks.

No. The internal
streets of the
proposed project do
not connect to
internal streets of
any adjacent site.

Waiver
requested per
SDBL.
(b) Street stub outs. Street stub
outs shall be provided to connect
to future subdivisions.

No. Street stub outs
are not proposed.

Waiver
requested per
SDBL.
(c) Block length. Maximum six
hundred sixty (660) foot blocks,
provided however, that for infill
development, Public Works and
Community. Development
Directors may approve a longer
block length.

Yes. The longest
block proposed is
approximately six
hundred and fifty-
five (655) feet long.

None.
(d) Rights-of-way. Minimum fifty-
six (56) foot local street width.

Minimum sixty (60) foot collector
street width.

No. The project
proposes internal
streets at thirty-six
(36) feet wide which
is less than the fifty-
six (56) foot
minimum.

Waiver
requested per
SDBL.
(e) Roadway width. Maximum
thirty-six (36) foot local street
width. Maximum forty (40) foot
collector street width.

No. The project
proposes twenty-six
(26) foot wide
roadway widths
which is less than
the thirty-six (36)
foot minimum.

Waiver
requested per
SDBL.

Page | 27

(f) Alley width. Maximum twenty
(20) foot alley width.

No. Alleys are
proposed to be
twenty-six (26) feet
wide.

Waiver
requested per
SDBL.

Table 5: Compliance to Section 9.240.550(E) (Traditional Neighborhood Design Development Standards)
Land Use Regulation Compliance Waiver Request
(g) Parkway. For local streets
minimum ten (10) foot parkway
width. The parkway shall include
a five (5) foot wide sidewalk and
the area between the sidewalk
and the curb shall be landscaped
unless obstructed by public
signage, fire hydrants or other
safety equipment, or utility
equipment. For non-local streets,
the minimum parkway width is
fifteen (15) feet. At the discretion
of the Public Works and
Community Development
Directors parkway widths can be
modified.

No. Parkways are
less than the ten
(10) foot wide
requirement, as the
parkways are
proposed at five (5)
feet and do not
include landscape
planters.

Waiver
requested per
SDBL.
(h)Traffic calming
features. Subdivisions shall
include traffic-calming features
such as traffic circles, bulb-outs,
center islands, chicanes, speed
humps, bicycle lanes/shared
lane markings (sharrows), or
other traffic calming devices
designed to minimize conflicts
between vehicles and
pedestrians, equestrians, and
bicycles.

Yes. The project
proposes narrow
streets that per their
narrow design act
as traffic calming
measures.

Additionally, the
street improvements
required on Camino
Real will narrow the
street which is also
a traffic calming
measure.

None.

Page | 28

Street lighting.
(a) Street lighting shall be
provided along all streets.

Yes. Street lighting
is proposed
throughout the
community.

None.
(b) Exterior lighting shall be
directed downward in order to
reduce glare onto adjacent
properties.

Yes. Street lighting
is conditioned to be
further reviewed to
ensure compliance
with this
requirement.

None.

Equestrian and pedestrian trails
and bicycle lane
connections. Equestrian and
pedestrian trails and bicycle lane
connectivity through or adjacent
to the single-family residential
subdivision shall be provided.

The pedestrian trails and bicycle
lane connections shall be
consistent with the circulation
master plan for bicyclists and
pedestrians.

Yes. A multipurpose
trail is being
provided along the
west side of Camino
Real.

None.

Table 5: Compliance to Section 9.240.550(E) (Traditional Neighborhood Design Development Standards)
Land Use Regulation Compliance Waiver Request
Architecture. Architectural styles
shall be consistent with the
Architectural Styles Sheet of the
Community Development
Department, which includes
Craftsmen, Victorian, California
Bungalow, American
Farmhouse, and California
Ranch. The architectural styles
within the subdivision shall:
(a) Be applied to new homes
and future additions to homes,
including detached accessory
buildings; and
Yes. The project is
proposing California
Bungalow, American
Farmhouse, and
California Ranch
Architectural Styles.

None.
(b) Continue architectural
features and fenestration on all
sides of dwelling units.

Yes. Architectural
features and
fenestration are
None.

Page | 29

provided on all sides
of dwelling.

Landscaping and
walls/fences. The composition
and location of landscaping shall
comply with the provisions
of Chapter 9.283 of this Code
and the following standards:
(a) Street trees. A minimum of
one (1) canopy tree per lot or
forty (40) feet of street frontage
when permissible. Street trees
shall be a minimum of two (2)
inch caliper measured six (6)
feet above the ground. A tree
landscaped area shall be
provided and be of an
appropriate size to
accommodate the mature size
and height of the tree. Trees
shall be located between the
sidewalk and the curb.

No. The project
does not propose
street trees as the
proposed parkways
do not include a
landscape planter.

Waiver
requested per
SDBL.

Table 5: Compliance to Section 9.240.550(E) (Traditional Neighborhood Design Development Standards)
Land Use Regulation Compliance Waiver Request
(b) Landscaping area. The front
yard setback area shall be
landscaped and include a
minimum of one (1) thirty-six-
inch box canopy tree.

No. The project
proposes front yard
trees for sixty-five
(65) of the sixty-
seven (67) lots. The
proposed trees will
be twenty-four (24)
inch box which do
not meet the
minimum
requirement of
thirty-six (36) box.

Waiver
requested per
SDBL.

Page | 30

The rear yard setback shall be
landscaped.

No. The project
does not propose to
landscape the rear
yard setback.

Waiver
requested per
SDBL.

Ninety (90) percent of the
required lot open space shall be
landscaped.

No. Only the front
yards are proposed
to be landscaped.

Waiver
requested per
SDBL. .
(c) Natural features. Single-
family residential subdivisions
shall protect and preserve
natural features such as, without
limitation, unique natural terrain,
rock outcroppings, streams
(perennial, intermittent,
ephemeral), mature trees, and
native habitat.

No. The proposed
project does not
protect or preserve
natural features.

Waiver
requested per
SDBL.
(d) Walls and fences.
(i) Decorative masonry, wrought
iron, wood, tubular steel, stone
or river, rock or vinyl fencings
with a natural wood appearance
are permitted.

Yes. The project
proposes block,
vinyl, and tubular
steel fencing.

None.
(ii) Maximum six (6) foot high
walls or fences. When walls or
fences are located within a
required front yard or street side
setback, the walls or fences shall
be a maximum of forty-two (42)
inches in height.

Yes. Six (6) foot
high walls are
proposed.

None.

Table 5: Compliance to Section 9.240.550(E) (Traditional Neighborhood Design Development Standards)
Land Use Regulation Compliance Waiver Request
(iii) Chain-link, chicken wire,
razor, serpentine barbed wire,
electrified, and similar type
fencing are prohibited.

Yes. The project
does not propose
any of the
unpermitted fencing
types.

None.

Page | 31

Affordability. Single-family
residential subdivisions subject
to this section shall be consistent
with the affordable housing
requirements of the housing
element for the Jurupa Valley
General Plan.

Yes. This project
provides three (3)
units that are
affordable to very
low income
households which
meets the City’s
inclusionary housing
ordinance’s
requirement for
affordable homes.

None.

VI. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF A SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT (SDP) Per Zoning Code Section 9.240.330(3) Requirements for Approval, no Site Development Permit shall be approved unless it complies with the following standards:

A. The proposed use must conform to all the requirements of the City of Jurupa Valley General Plan and with all applicable requirements of State law and the ordinance of the City of Jurupa Valley.

B. The overall development of the land shall be designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare; to conform to the logical development of the land and to be compatible with the present and logical development of the surrounding property. The plan shall consider the location and need for dedication and improvement of necessary streets and sidewalks, including the avoidance of traffic congestion; and shall take into account topographical and drainage conditions, including the need for dedication and improvements of necessary structures as a part thereof.

C. All site development permits which permit the construction of more than one structure on a single legally divided parcel shall, in addition to all other requirements, be subject to a condition which prohibits the sale of any existing or subsequently constructed structures on the parcel until the parcel is divided and a final map recorded in accordance with Title 7 in such a manner that each building is located on a separate legally divided parcel.

VII. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE LAND DIVISION MAP.

Per Section 7.15.180 of the Jurupa Valley Municipal Code, “ A tentative map shall be denied if it does not meet all requirements of this ordinance, or if any of the following findings are made:”
1) That the proposed land division is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans;
Page | 32

2) That the design or improvement of the proposed land division is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans;
3) That the site of the proposed land division is not physically suitable for the type of development;
4) That the site of the proposed land division is not physically suitable for the proposed density of the development;
5) That the design of the proposed land division or proposed improvements are likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat;
6) That the design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements are likely to cause serious public health problems;
7) That the design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements will conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of, property within the proposed land division. A land division may be approved if it is found that alternative easements for access or for use will be provided and that they will be substantially equivalent to ones previously acquired by the public. This subsection shall apply only to easements of record or to easements established by judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction; and
8) Notwithstanding subsection (5) of this section, a tentative map may be approved if an environmental impact report was prepared with respect to the project and a finding was made, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. Resources Code Section 21000 e t seq. ), that specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the environmental impact report.

VIII. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF DENSITY BONUS
Jurupa Valley Municipal Code Section 9.3 00.050(D) provides that under Density Bonus Law, t he C ity shall approve a waiver or reduction of a development standard, unless it makes one (1) or more of the following findings:
1) The application of the development standard does not have the effect of physically precluding the construction of a housing development at the density allowed by the density bonus and with the incentives or concessions granted to the applicant;
2) The waiver or reduction of the development standard would have a specific, adverse impact, as defined in Government Code Section 65589.5(d)(2) upon health, safety, or the physical environment, and for which there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific adverse impact;
3) The waiver or reduction of the development standard would have an adverse impact on any real property that is listed in the California Register of Historical Resources; or
Page | 33

4) The waiver or reduction of the development standard would be contrary to state or federal law.

The developer seeks to waive and/or reduce a number of development standards.

The imposition of the standards pertaining to minimum lot size, lot width, lot depth, front yard setback, side yard, and rear yard setback would have the effect of physically precluding the construction of the development at the density proposed.

The imposition of the requirements set forth in Jurupa Valley Municipal Code section 9.240.540(E)(3) that only 25% of the homes may be two story, that two story homes may not be adjacent to each other and that two-story homes may not be on corner lots would not physically preclude the construction of 67 homes.

Additionally, the imposition of the requirements set forth in Jurupa Valley Municipal Code section 9.240.540(E)(13) that require thirty-six (36) inch box trees in the front yard, rear yard setback landscaping, and ninety (90) percent landscaping of open space would not physically preclude the construction of 67 homes. The developer could still construct the requested number of units, they would just be small er in size.

The developer contends that under SDBL the City must grant all waivers requested if it would require the developer to redesign its project.

PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
On October 9, 2024, the Planning Commission held a public hearing for the proposed project, at which time all persons interested in the proposed project had the opportunity to address the Planning Commission. At the public hearing , Planning Commissioners asked questions about the horse trail on Jurupa Road, the Madone Collection residential project, Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA), and traffic on Camino Real.

The applicant, Warmington Residential, clarified the following points:

1. The proposed project site does not front on Jurupa Road and street improvements along Jurupa Road were not required.

2. Street improvements along Camino Real would be provided in the form of a multi - purpose trail.

3. The applicant was not involved with the Madone Collection project ; the applicant purchased the property after the original owner(s) determined that the project was not financially feasible.

With respect to RHNA, the proposed project would provide a total of sixty-seven (67) units on a site that was identified in the Housing Element as having the potential to provide a maximum of fifty-five (55) units at the moderate income level. Three (3) of the sixty-seven (67) units are proposed to be made affordable to very low income households. Because the project site was expected to provide only fifty-five (55) moderate income level homes and the project is proposing to provide three (3) very low income level homes and sixty - four (64) moderate income level homes, the proposed homes would result in a surplus of nine (9) moderate units, and three (3) low income units.

Regarding Camino Real, it was determined that traffic conditions along Camino Real would stay relatively similar to existing conditions. Although staff recommended street Page | 34

improvements to alleviate traffic in this area, per State Density Bonus Law, the applicant qualified for one (1) incentive/concession which they used to deviate from staff’s request for street widening.

Letter from Warmington’s attorney
The staff report for the Planning Commission meeting recommended that the Planning Commission approve the Project, but not approve six waivers, some related to landscaping and most related to the City’s one-story requirements (e.g., no more than 25 percent of the homes must have two stories). On October 7, 2024, the City received a letter from Warmington ’s legal counsel explaining how the conditional approval of the Project, without approving the waiver of the one- story and landscape requirements, was tantamount to a denial of the Project in violation of SDBL. The letter claims that the City would be in violation of the State Density Bonus Law (California Government Code Sections 65915-65918) if the waivers to allow 100% two- story homes are denied. The letter states that the City cannot deny a waiver because the project can be redesigned and that “a city may not apply any development standard that would physically preclude construction of the project as designed.” See Attachment 5.

The Planning Commission opened the public hearing and continued the item to October 23, 2024 to allow staff additional time to analyze the letter. The October 23, 2024 Planning Commission meeting was cancelled due to lack of quorum.

Letter from California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) On October 16, 2024, the City received an email from the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) informing the City that HCD had received a request for technical assistance regarding the proposed project. On October 29, 2024, the City met with HCD staff to discuss the project. HCD asked for the City ’s perspective on the requested waivers and for a description of the project in general.

On November 12, 2024, the City received a Notice of Potential Violation from the California Department of Housing and Community Development (“HCD”). See Attachment 6. The notice explained that the City could not deny the waivers on the basis that it “ could theoretically be redesigned to achieve the same density without the requested waivers.” Instead, the City had to make specific findings, to deny the waivers.

Specifically, the City was required to find that (1) the waiver or reduction of the development standard would have a specific, adverse impact, as defined in Government Code Section 65589.5(d)(2) upon health, safety, or the physical environment, and for which there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific adverse impact; (2) the waiver or reduction of the development standard would have an adverse impact on any real property that is listed in the California Register of Historical Resources; or (3) the waiver or reduction of the development standard would be contrary to state or federal law.

The notice reminded the City that HCD has enforcement authority over SDBL and that HCD may notify the California Attorney General that the City has violated state law if the Project is not approved with the waivers requested.

Page | 35

November 13, 2024 Planning Commission hearing
On November 13, 2024, the Planning Commission held a public hearing regarding the Project. The Planning Commission expressed concern about public health and safety issues, primarily because the perimeter wall proposed to be constructed on the northwest corner of the Project would obstruct the view of residents exiting from Kirby Drive. A resident spoke at the hearing about how the perimeter wall proposed to be located along Kirby Drive would endanger the public health and safety of the residents who live adjacent to the Project site. The Project is located adjacent to Kirby Drive and the north side of the Project site runs parallel to Jurupa Road. The Project is designed to have a six-foot-high perimeter wall constructed parallel to Jurupa Road. There are six residential homes directly adjacent to the Project that use Kirby Drive as their only access point and these residents need to cross railroad tracks to access Jurupa Road. The construction of a six- foot high wall parallel to Jurupa Road will obstruct the line of sight of the drivers who are traveling along Kirby Drive and would prevent drivers from being able to see if a train is coming before they enter Jurupa Road. Residents would be forced to pull out past the perimeter wall to see if a train is traveling along Jurupa Road. This could create a significant public safety issue as they would be very close to the train before they see it.

In addition, the Planning Commissioners were concerned that the Project had a singular access point from Camino Real Drive and this could impact the ability of residents of the Project to safely evacuate in case of an emergency. Some Planning Commissioners also expressed concern about the density of the Project, but since the Project is entitled to a density bonus as discussed in the prior memorandum, this issue will not be addressed in this memorandum.

At the conclusion of the Planning Commission meeting, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to deny the Project and requested that staff bring back a resolution of denial.

On December 11, 2024, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to adopt the resolution of denial.

PERIMETER WALL
The Engineering Department has evaluated the line of sight issue that was raised at the Planning Commission meeting. The Engineering Department has determined that the proposed walls that are located parallel to Jurupa Road can have corner cuts outs that will address the line of sight issue. The Engineering Department has prepared a condition of approval, should the project be approved that reads as follows:
“The proposed walls along Lot 6 and 68 shall ensure a clear sight distance in accordance with the FHWA’s ‘Railroad Highway Grade Crossing Handbook ’, Section IV, Table 41. In addition, signage shall comply with the California MUTCD Part 8: Traffic Control for Railroad and Light Rail Transit Grade Crossings. Final details must be coordinated with the railroad, or a conservative approach shall be taken by using a 2,000-foot clear sight distance set 15 feet from the closest railroad track from Kirby Drive or provide 15’ clearance from behind the northwest corner of Lot 6 that extends to the northwest corner of Lot 7, whichever is greater. This sight line must be shown on the plans submitted for entitlement.”

Page | 36

ADDITIONAL LETTERS IN SUPPORT OF THE PROJECT
On November 27, 2024, YIMBY Law sent a letter to the City threatening legal action if the City denies the Project, or if it approves the Project but denies any of the requested waivers. See Attachment 7.

On December 5, 2024, the Housing Defense Fund sent a letter to the City advising that the City may not apply any development standard that would physically preclude construction of the project as designed. The letter further states that “if the City persist in its denial, and face a lawsuit, it will be liable for attorney’s fees and costs of suit pursuant to Government Code, section 65915, subdivision (e)(1). If the City is found to have violated the HAA in addition to wrongly denying requested waivers under the DBL, additional penalties apply. (See Gov. C ode, § 65589.5, subd. (k)(1)(B).) The liability for violating state housing law can be severe. As an example, the City of Berkeley was recently forced to pay $4 million after wrongfully denying a housing development project.” See Attachment 8.

On December 12, 2024, Warmington’s attorney sent a letter to the City advising that a denial of the project was not supported by substantial evidence. The letter noted that the City had previously approved the location of the wall when it approved the Madone Collection project and that the public safety concerns were a pretense to support the denial of the project. The letter explains that the City cannot deny the project without making a finding that the project would have a specific, adverse impact upon the public health or safety unless the project is disapproved or approved upon the condition that the project be developed at a lower density; and that there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the adverse impact, other than the disapproval of th e housing development project or the approval of the project upon the condition that it be developed at a lower density. The letter explains that the City did not identify a specific standard that the project does not comply with and that the City could condition the project to mitigate any line of sight issues. See Attachment 9.

On December 19, 2024, Housing Action Coalition sent a letter to the City advising that a project denial would violate the Housing Accountability Act and denial of the waivers would violate both the Housing Accountability Act and SDBL. The letter explained that HCD has taken the position that if a project qualifies under SDBL, and if waivers are needed to physically allow that project as designed to go forward with the incentives and concessions granted, the waivers must be granted. See Attachment 10.

CITY COMPLIANCE WITH HOUSING ELEMENT LAW
The City’s Housing Element was certified on April 22, 2022. The City was the first city in Riverside County to have its Housing Element certified. The Housing Element identified that the City has a regional housing needs allocation (“RHNA”) of 4,497 new housing units for the 2021-2029 planning period. The RHNA income category breakdown is as follows:
1,207 extremely low/very low income units, 749 low income units, 731 moderate income units, and 1,810 above moderate income units. In an effort to meet its RHNA obligation, the City has approved a number of housing development projects that required General Plan Amendments and zone changes. As of December 2024, the City has approved housing development projects and other General Plan amendments and zone changes that would allow for the potential development of 2,308 extremely low/very low income

Page | 38

4. MA21143 Mitigated Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP)

5. First letter from attorney for Developer dated October 7, 2024

6. Letter from State of California Housing and Community Development Department dated November 12, 2024

7. Letter from YMBY Law dated November 27, 2024

8. Letter from California Housing Defense Fund dated December 5, 2024

9. Second letter from attorney for Developer dated December 12, 2024

10. Letter from Housing Action Coalition dated December 19, 2024

Jurupa Valley City CouncilFebruary 6, 2025

Jurupa Valley City Council
February 6, 2025