5. Detailed Work Plan and Schedule
Project Understanding
For the past 15 years, the Inland Empire has been
experiencing explosive growth in industrial warehousing due to growing demand for logistics. In Southern California there is a projected doubling of international trade through the Ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles by 2040,
and projected population growth of 18 million people in the SCAG region. From an economic perspective (jobs
and tax revenue), this is a good thing. However, these
facilities generate significant truck traffic, which creates both roadway maintenance issues and health and safety
concerns for nearby residents. As part of this update,
we will work closely with City staff to revisit roadway classifications, evaluate existing truck prohibitions, and recommend truck routes that minimize maintenance costs
and impacts on residents and sensitive receptors, such
as schools, neighborhoods, and parks. This is a challenge facing many communities we have worked with in the Inland Empire, High Desert, Northern California (Tracy, Lathrop, and Stockton), and across the country in places like Portland OR, Vancouver WA, and Salt Lake City UT. Truck access is critical and must be carefully planned to avoid conflicts with bicyclists, pedestrians, and autos. Truck parking is another concern frequently raised by residents. Provisions for truck parking are needed for Jurupa Valley residents that own and operate their own trucks and need overnight parking, and for day- and over-the-road drivers (aka, shorthaul and longhaul) that need safe places to stage and take federally mandated breaks.
The City also faces a new State mandate that requires
jurisdictions to designate truck routes in general plan circulation elements, and for the City of Jurupa Valley and other cities and counties named as being in the “Warehouse Concentration Region”, the update must happen by January 1, 2026. Our team understands the urgency of this
effort and comes equipped with current knowledge
about the community and our extensive knowledge
on AB 98 and trucking regulations. Our approach
entails a comprehensive community outreach strategy for listening to and learning about the concerns of residents and businesses. Collaboratively, we look forward to
investigating opportunities for improving quality of life, safety, accessibility, sustainability, and economic vitality.
Project Approach
The multi-disciplinary team that we have assembled
combines our local knowledge of the City of Jurupa Valley (land uses, zoning, demographics, and travel patterns) with leading experts in the goods movement industry who are
up to speed with the most recent State and federal laws and regulations governing industrial development and truck operations. Our local knowledge and freight expertise in the area will allow us to update the Mobility Element to meet the AB 98 deadline within seven (7) months following the notice to proceed.
Our approach is based on answering the following primary questions – which we have already begun to do based on
our knowledge of the City, logistics activities and trends in California, and discussions with the City:
•
Wh
ich corridors currently carry the highest volumes of
trucks? Will these corridors continue to see the most
growth in truck traffic? Which other corridors will be
impacted in the future?
•
Ho
w can the City accommodate access to trucks while
minimizing community impacts, such as congestion,
noise, excessive speeds and safety risks, and pavement
damage?
•
Ho
w will the City incorporate design standards required
by AB 98 (e.g., gate setbacks, auxiliary power for trucks at loading docks, etc.)?
•
Wh
at is the current pavement condition of the corridors
carrying the highest truck volumes? Do they need to be
upgraded to handle future increases in truck traffic?
Based on our deep understanding of freight activities and supply chains and our experience working in the Inland
Empire, and in the City of Jurupa Valley, the following key factors have resulted in increased truck traffic:
•
Ec
onomic growth and development in the City and
Riverside and San Bernardino Counties is occurring in
the form of warehousing, distribution centers, intermodal rail/truck, parcel hub warehouse and fulfillment centers resulting in truck traffic increases
•
Co
llisions and congestion on I-15 and SR-60 resulting in
traffic exiting the freeways and using alternative routes in the City, such as Mission Boulevard and Wineville Road
We understand current applications for industrial
development projects, as well as proposed industrial
development in neighboring cities, such as Fontana and
unincorporated San Bernardino County, raise further
questions about inter-regional truck trips and provisions for designated truck routes. Coordination with adjacent jurisdictions is also needed to ensure truck routes have logical connections and termini.
Our approach will map current and anticipated truck
generators and estimate truck activity on City streets and at 6 Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
7 freeway interchanges to understand the City’s truck access and routing needs. Next, we will add sensitive receptors to the map. This will provide a basis for identifying a network of truck routes. Once potential routes have been identified, we will work with Public Works staff to document the pavement conditions of the proposed truck routes and determine if hardening of the facilities is needed to accommodate future truck volumes. We will follow these steps to identify the proposed truck routes:
1. Gather existing truck-related policies in the
California Vehicle Code and other State
regulations, Jurupa Valley General Plan, and the
Jurupa Valley Municipal Code
2 . Develop a systematic procedure to identify truck
routes and truck prohibitions
3. Address the potential revenue generation needed
from new industrial development to offset roadway
ma
intenance
4. Identify intersection geometry of potential truck
routes
5. Develop a set of improvements complete with cost
estimates
6 . Develop performance measures and a funding plan
for prioritizing implementation
Phase 1 - Project Administration/
Coordination
Objective
Project administration and coordination are crucial for effectively managing the schedule to ensure that the City can meet the AB 98 deadline for designating truck routes in its Mobility Element.
Approach
Our approach to project management is to establish a
communication protocol at the onset of the project, set expectations for deliverables and City reviews, and maintain constant and consistent communication with the City’s
Project Manager.
Scope
1. 1 Project Kick-Off Meeting
Fehr & Peers proposes that the project Kick-Off meeting with the City occur within two weeks of Notice to Proceed (NTP). All task leads will participate. This meeting will set expectations for developing a robust Freight Analysis and amending the City’s General Plan to incorporate designated truck routes within the AB 98 deadline of January 1, 2026.
Specifically, the team will discuss the following key elements at the Kick-Off meeting:
•
Sch
edule: regular meetings, deliverables, outreach, and
public hearing dates to target
• Da
ta needs and data collection
• St
akeholder engagement: overall strategy, outreach plan
components, types of events/outreach, mechanisms for
notifying the public, etc.
• Com
munication protocols – both internal and external
This kick-off meeting will be followed by a virtual, partner agency kick-off meeting with WRCOG, RCTC, Caltrans
District 8, and SCAG shortly thereafter.
1.2: Regular Project Meetings
During the Project Kick-Off Meeting, a regular day/time will be identified for continual project team meetings. Meetings will be held monthly with the team, and as specific issues arise, additional meetings will be scheduled. These regular meetings will be used to discuss data needs and sources, findings, options and solutions, and potential issues/
concerns.
1.3: Monthly Reporting and Invoicing
Regular monthly progress reports and invoices will be
prepared and submitted to the City. The progress reports will summarize tasks in progress and/or completed,
deliverables, and overall project status and next steps.
Deliverables
1. Ci
ty Staff Kick-Off Meeting: Outlook meeting
notice, agenda, presentation, and meeting notes
2. Pa
rtner Agency Kick-Off Meeting: Outlook meeting
notice, agenda, presentation, and meeting notes
3. Re
gular meetings: recurring Outlook meeting
notice, agendas, and minutes
4. Mon
thly progress reports and invoices
Phase 2 – Existing Conditions Report
Objective
The Existing Conditions report will establish the baseline for understanding truck activity and freight access needs, as well as regional goods movement activities that impact the City today, and supply chain trends that may impact the City in the future.
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
8 Approach
For the existing conditions report, the Fehr & Peers Team will build upon existing land use and transportation planning experience that we have with the City, including our work on the Pedley Town Center Plan and the Jurupa Valley
Corridors Plan, as well as AB 98 implementation work
that we are currently leading for SBCTA and WRCOG,
and a truck parking study that we are working on with
Caltrans District 8. The existing conditions report will cover relevant federal, State, and local regulations and legislation associated with goods movement, and provide a detailed
analysis of existing conditions associated with truck-
generating uses in the City. This effort will document truck route prohibitions in the City, truck-generating land uses, truck travel patterns, pavement conditions on truck-traveled corridors, truck-involved collisions, and unauthorized truck parking activity. This will also include baseline “urban/rural context mapping” to identify segments of major streets
within which pedestrian, bicycle and equestrian activities are prioritized by the General Plan and Draft Citywide Corridors Plan, as it relates to future truck routing decisions.
Scope
2.1 Existing Regulations and Truck Restrictions &
Regulatory and Policy Gap Analysis
The Fehr & Peers Team brings together national experts in goods movement and planners and engineers with a long
history of supporting the City’s planning and design efforts.
These areas of expertise will work together to develop
a comprehensive review of policies and regulations, an
analysis of the differences between policies and regulations that govern truck travel over streets and highways versus policies and regulations that govern truck access to
customer locations, and an all-encompassing policy and
regulatory gap analysis to guide updates to the City’s
General Plan Mobility Element and Municipal Code.
As a first step, we will develop a comprehensive list of terms and definitions derived from existing laws and regulations that govern the movement of goods and freight facilities.
Next, a comprehensive list of statewide, regional, and local policies, regulations, and legislation will be documented and summarized. For example, vehicle classifications defined by the Federal Highway Administration (e.g., GVW Classes 1-8) and types that are identified in the California Vehicle Codes are different, and Caltrans regulates California
Legal Trucks differently than federally legal STAA (Surface Transportation Act) trucks. The nuances are critical for understanding access needs to industrial warehouses and intermodal yards, as well as for complying with federal and state regulations.
Factor FHWA
Classification
Caltrans
Classification
S ystem Type Based on axle
count and use
Based on weight
and function
Passenger
Vehicles
Classes 1-3
(motorcycles, cars,
SUVs)
Light-duty vehicles
(cars, pickups)
Medium
Trucks
Classes 4-7 (buses,
box trucks)
Medium-duty
vehicles (vans,
delivery trucks)
Heavy Trucks Classes 8-13
(single/multi-trailer)
Heavy-duty
vehicles (single-
unit, combo trucks)
Regulatory
Focus
Traffic monitoring
& national
standards
Weight limits,
road permits, CA-
specific regulations
The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) hours of service (HOS) regulations govern truck driver time on duty, time driving, and mandated breaks. Drivers must take breaks on time (e.g., a 30-minute break after 8 hours on duty) and park their truck or risk substantial fines. This development has created situations where drivers cannot legally move their trucks for 30 minutes and thereby park on local streets.
Many trucks are also delivering freight at a scheduled time, and given their time constraints they often stage on the street unless a nearby travel plaza, truck stop, or other truck parking area is available. In the summertime, they run their engines to keep their cab cool creating both emissions and noise impacts. As such, our team will look at policies and regulations from dual perspectives:
•
Fr
om the City’s perspective, identifying objectives,
options, and limitations.
• Fr
om the trucking industry perspective, identifying
mandates, limitations, and obligations.
In addition to policies and regulations on trucking operations, there are also several State and local regulations associated with the development and operations of freight-generating uses, such as the Indirect Source Rule 2305 and the latest State legislation pursuant to Assembly Bill 98 (AB 98).
For this task, we will prepare a comprehensive review and detailed summary of regulations associated with truck
routing, access, and industrial development standards. This information will be used to develop recommended municipal code and general plan updates, including the designation of truck routes.
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
9 The schedule for this study is being driven by new
regulations on cities regarding truck routes and logistics uses associated with AB 98. The new legislation names
the Counties of Riverside and San Bernardino and several cities within the two counties, including Jurupa Valley, as “Warehouse Concentration Region” jurisdictions. The
“Warehouse Concentration Region” jurisdictions must meet more stringent siting and building design standards, and they are also subject to a much shorter timeline for complying – January 1, 2026 instead of January 1, 2028. The regulations associated with this law require cities to:
1. Designate truck routes pursuant to Government Code
Section 65302.02, including:
a.
Pr
ovide opportunities for community
involvement in the designation of the truck
routes and make a diligent effort to achieve
public participation of all economic segments of
the community
b.
Am
end the circulation element of the general
plan to incorporate the designated truck routes
c. Pr
epare a GIS layer of the truck routes
d. Ins
tall “conspicuous” truck route signage
2. Update the Municipal Code pursuant to Government
Code Section 65098 (Chapter 2.8 Warehouse Design and
Build Standards) as follows:
a.
Inc
orporate new definitions, such as “21st
Century Warehouse”, “Expansion of existing
logistics use”, “Sensitive Receptor”, etc. which
may be defined differently in other regulations
b.
Mo dify siting standards for “logistics uses”, such
as buffers, truck access locations, and minimum
setbacks
c.
Mo
dify building standards for “logistics uses”,
such as provisions for conduits at loading
“bays”, high-efficiency climate control, and
electric vehicle charging stations
Some of these requirements are inconsistent with other
pieces of legislation, such as South Coast Air Quality
Management District’s Indirect Source Rule, which applies to buildings that are more than 100,000 square feet. For this effort, we will provide a summary of relevant regulations and legislation and recommend changes to the City’s municipal code to ensure that the City complies with AB 98 and all other regulations associated with “logistics uses” and truck routing. We will prepare a thorough review of the City’s General Plan policies, identify any gaps in existing policies pursuant to the regulations/legislation, and prepare policy recommendations to fill the gaps.
2.2 Key Freight Generators and Truck Travel
Patterns
Working with PlaceWorks and Sargent Town Planning, we
will investigate existing and future truck generating land uses, including “logistics uses” as defined by AB 98. This information is critical for understanding truck activity in the City, such as truck origins and destinations, travel patterns, speeds, and facility access needs.
Image depicts Jurupa Valley’s unauthorized truck
parking frequency
Image depicts the study area of the Etiwanda
Avenue EIR Report
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
10 Jurupa Valley Truck
Prohibitions Map
Once we have identified the existing freight generators, we propose using a combination of roadway and intersection classification counts and big data to estimate existing truck travel patterns, such as volumes, speeds, and origins and destinations. Utilizing the City’s GIS General Plan Land Use, Zoning, and Trucks Not Allowed layers coupled with truck origins/destinations provided by Geotab data (available for free from SCAG through June 30, 2025), we will identify a number of locations throughout the City to collect vehicle classification counts. Given the school year ends on May 22nd, the counts will be scheduled immediately upon
receiving Notice to Proceed and collected no later than May 15, 2025. The traffic count data will aid with calibrating the Geotab data, which typically represents 15-20 percent of the truck volumes moving in, out, and through the City. Upon an initial review of the City’s industrial and commercial uses that typically generate truck traffic, we tentatively proposed collecting traffic classification counts at the following locations:
Proposed Segment Counts
1. Ph
iladelphia Street, between I-15 and Burgundy
Place
2. Ri
verside Drive east of I-15
3. Can
tu-Galleano Ranch Road east of I-15
4. Co
untry Village Road north of SR 60
5. Mi
ssion Boulevard south of SR 60
6. Ma
rket Street north of Rivera Street
7. Ag
ua Mansa Road north of Market Street
8. Ga
lena Street east of Rutile Street
9. Fe
lspar Street north of Jurupa Road
10. Wi
neville Road south of Riverside Drive
11. Mi
ssion Boulevard east of Byrne Road
12. Mi
ssion Boulevard west of Byrne Road
13. Ru bidoux Boulevard northeast of 30th Street
14. Ri
verside Drive west of Etiwanda Avenue
15. Et
iwanda Avenue north of SR 60
Proposed Intersection Counts
1. Ph
iladelphia Avenue at Country Village Road/
Mulberry Avenue
2. Ri
verside Drive/Wineville Road
3. Ri
verside Drive/Etiwanda Avenue
4. Can
tu-Galleano Ranch Road/Wineville Road
5. Can
tu-Galleano Ranch Road/Etiwanda Avenue
6. Lan
don Drive/Wineville Road
7. Be
llgrave Avenue/Wineville Road
8. Bel
legrave Avenue/Van Buren Boulevard (and train
counts with gate down times)
9. Li
monite Avenue/ Pats Ranch Road
10. Li
monite Avenue/Van Buren Boulevard
11. Li
monite Avenue/Clay Street
12. Van
Buren Boulevard/ Clay Street
13. Va
n Buren Boulevard/Jurupa Road (and train
counts with gate down time)
14. Mi
ssion Boulevard at San Sevaine Way/Ben Nevis
Boulevard
15. Mi
ssion Boulevard/Bellegrave Avenue
16. Ma
rket Street at Via Cerro/24th Street
17. Mar
ket Street/Rubidoux Boulevard
18. Ta
rragona Drive/El Rivino Road at Rubidoux
Boulevard/Cedar Avenue
19. El
Rivinio Road/Hall Avenue
20. Gal
ena Street/Felspar Street
Image depicts unenforced truck
prohibition signage taken in Jurupa Valley
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
11 2.3 Truck-Involved Crashes and Safety Concerns
Safety considerations will play a key role in the designation and design of truck routes. For this effort, Fehr & Peers will evaluate truck-involved collisions over a five-year period using Transportation Injury Mapping Network (TIMS) and
information provided by the City and the Riverside County Sheriff’s Office and Fire Department. This information will a
lso feed into the development of the City’s High-Injury Network (HIN), a new requirement pursuant to Senate Bill 932. The data coupled with insights provided from first responders, Jurupa Valley Unified School District, and other key stakeholders will be documented.
2.4 Design Considerations and Pavement
Conditions
For this task, Fehr & Peers will use AutoTURN to review truck turning movements at intersections that are currently being used by medium- and heavy-duty trucks. AutoTURN
provides the “swept path” of trucks to determine if the turning radii is suffi
cient to safely accommodate left and
right turns without overtaking an oncoming travel lane, sidewalk, or utilities. In some cases, trucks may be avoiding a better route due to design deficiencies. For this analysis, we anticipate the analysis of up to 20 intersections. This analysis will inform the next step – identification of improvements (Phase 4). Mark Thomas will lead the design component of this effort.
For the pavement evaluation, Mark Thomas will evaluate the condition of existing pavement along roadways used by
trucks and assess pavement performance and identify
deficiencies at a high level. Specifically, this phase will document the current conditions of the pavement, identify roadway stress by type and severity, and develop a
pavement condition index for each segment. This will be accomplished through field investigations, a careful review of as-builts and pavement and maintenance history, and
collection of environmental conditions affecting pavement p
erformance.
Mark Thomas will secure available roadway as-builts
from the City and County of Riverside to provide an initial assessment of the pavement thicknesses for the corridors to be included as part of the potential truck routes within the project limits. Additionally, they will meet with City staff on recent permit information that involved trench repair within these corridors, and available geotechnical data from other City or private development projects as well. Lastly, where bridges exist within these potential truck route corridors, Mark Thomas will secure available recent Caltrans and/or County bridge inspection reports to document sufficiency ratings and recommended repairs. This information will be compiled with the roadway sections extracted in tabular format as the Preliminary Pavement Conditions Assessment.
Following these efforts, Mark Thomas will field verify
pavement conditions to note the following:
• Are
as where pavement conditions are in good condition
and rehabilitation (i.e. grind/overlay) is feasible
• Are
as where pavement conditions are severely distressed,
and rehabilitation is not possible
This information will be compiled into a GIS level pavement distress map with photographic log of pavement conditions and added to the Final Pavement Conditions Assessment.
Where widening and other modifications to existing
curb lines (i.e. turn pockets, widened lanes, larger curb returns, etc) are identified, Mark Thomas will provide
an Infrastructure Impact Assessment Memorandum
documenting utility relocations / modifications, right of way acquisition needs if any, and drainage considerations to be used as the basis for estimating the costs to complete these improvements.
Deliverables
1. Exi
sting Conditions Report
2. Fin
al Existing Conditions Report
3. Aut
oTURN analysis at up to 20 intersections
4. Tru
ck weights by classification documentation
5. Dra
ft pavement condition assessment report
6. Fin
al pavement condition assessment report
7. Pav
ement distress maps
8. Pho
tographs of pavement conditions
9. Infr
astructure impact assessment technical
memorandum
Phase 3 - Community Engagement
Objective
The objective of this task is to engage both residents and industry, as well as other agencies, such as Caltrans and adjacent jurisdictions.
The residents of Jurupa Valley have been battling impacts from warehousing development for more than a decade
– frequently making it into the Los Angeles Times over
development battles with the City of Fontana. Supported by community-based organizations, such as Earth Justice, the Sierra Club, and the University of Redlands, and partner agencies, such as Jurupa Valley Unified School District and Riverside County Sheriff’s Office and Fire Department, the negative impacts generated by warehouse development
that exists both within and adjacent to Jurupa Valley
have been documented. The economic benefits of these
facilities, such as jobs, infrastructure improvements, and Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
12 air quality impacts, as well as roadway wear-and-tear.
The public engagement process will focus on solutions
developed through brainstorming exercises that seek to fully understand the problems rather than simply identify them.
Fehr & Peers will leverage our relationships with trade associations, industrial developers, trucking companies, truck drivers, freight facility operators, and shippers to engage them in the planning process through easy-to-
access surveys, one-on-one interviews, and through visits to their facilities.
Our approach for engaging WRCOG and Caltrans will
build upon current efforts that align with this project. We are currently working with WRCOG and SBCTA on AB 98
efforts. WRCOG and SBCTA would like to be involved in
a greater effort to coordinate truck routes across city and county lines. We will work with both WRCOG and SBCTA
to develop a strategy for collaborating with adjacent
jurisdictions on truck routing and truck parking solutions. In addition, we recommend inviting Caltrans staff. For Caltrans District 8, we are currently working on a Truck Parking Study and have also had recent discussions with them about truck routing requirements. Caltrans is very interested in working with local jurisdictions to help solve the truck parking problem, and we feel that Caltrans should also be the keeper of the AB 98-required GIS truck route layers.
Engagement will be supported by all members of our team.
Each team member maintains deep ties to the community,
partner agencies, and industry in Jurupa Valley and the Inland Empire, and we understand the best outreach
approach for obtaining quality responses from each of these stakeholder groups.
Approach
The Project Team has vast experience conducting
engagement with various stakeholder groups. We will use the following approach for conducting engagement:
•
Es
tablish a Stakeholder Advisory Committee (SAC)
• De
velop outreach plan
• De
velop Survey Questionnaire (e.g., SocialPinpoint,
Community Voice)
• Con
duct outreach with various stakeholder groups
• Su
mmarize and share findings
• Ob
tain feedback on potential strategies and solutions
Scope
3.1: Develop Outreach Plan
The Fehr & Peers Team will develop an Outreach Plan that provides: 1) a list of stakeholders complete with affiliation and contact information, 2) schedule for engaging various stakeholder types, 3) strategy for disseminating information, 4) social media protocol, and City website and Facebook page development, and 5) survey questions and survey
instruments.
We will initiate the development of a stakeholder list based on the Team’s existing relationships with partner agencies, adjacent jurisdictions, industry, and community groups. We will review and revise the list in collaboration with City staff.
The list will be further refined for targeted outreach, such as identifying:
•
Gr
oups to engage through community workshops
• Pa
rtner agencies and adjacent jurisdictions to meet with
collectively
• Indu
stry representatives to interview one-on-one
Approach Pros/Cons
Online Survey Pros: Easy to implement, less intrusive with the daily schedule, good if followed up by video, phone, or on-site interviews.
Cons: Difficult to obtain details or ask follow up questions, low response rates Focus group video
conferencing
Pros: Allows broader/diverse national participation with much lower travel and other associated costs, detailed discussions, and brainstorming.
Cons: Scheduling and availability.
Phone interviews Pros: Interactive, quality information, easy to follow up with responses.
Cons: Resource intensive, scheduling issues.
On-site interviews Pros: Similar to phone interviews but with the advantage of being face to face.
Cons: Resource intensive, scheduling issues.
Potential Approaches for Identifying Issues, Concerns, and Best Practices Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
13 The type of outreach is important, and one size does not fit all. As described in the table, there are pros and cons associated with each outreach approach.
Fehr & Peers proposes a hybrid outreach approach
(i.e., online survey, focused in person and virtual group workshops, on-site meetings, and one-on-one interviews).
This approach ensures broader and more diverse
participation resulting in a higher quality outcome. We propose the development of a short list of questions that stakeholders can easily respond to from a smart phone,
tablet, or personal computer. The questions will be
accompanied by a mapping tool (e.g., SocialPinpoint) that allows participants to drop pins on a map and add notes about the problem they are experiencing or witnessing at that location, such as trucks blocking travel lanes, poor pavement conditions, etc. The online survey will be posted on the Project website (to be developed in coordination with the City), advertised through notices posted at public facilities, and disseminated directly to stakeholders using the email database of stakeholders developed as part of the stakeholder list.
The project team will obtain a minimum of 50 complete
survey responses from community members, freight facility operators, trucking operators, and industrial warehouse developers. In addition, we will conduct 10 in-depth
interviews or industry-focused meetings, up to four (4) stakeholder workshops, and up to four (4) in-person
meetings with agency partners.
3.2: Conduct Outreach and Summarize Findings
After selecting the outreach approaches, the next step
towards conducting outreach is to develop an interview
or survey questionnaire. We will use a targeted approach that allows the messaging and questions to adapt based
on the kind/type of stakeholder. This is critical since we are reaching out to diverse stakeholders with different perspectives issues, such as residents, workers, facility operators, and truck drivers.
The questionnaire will capture:
•
Th
e type of respondent (e.g., resident, partner agency
staff, adjacent jurisdiction staff, community based
organization, business owner/operator, industrial
developer, truck driver, etc.)
•
Th
e type and location(s) of concern(s)
• Th
e ideas for solving truck access, parking, safety, or other freight-related concerns
After closing the survey and completing the industry
interviews, first two community workshops, and first
meeting with partner agencies and adjacent jurisdictions, we will compile the responses, identify common themes,
and publish the findings. Next, we propose a second round of outreach following the completion of Phases 2, 4 and 6 to share findings, obtain feedback and input on potential solutions, and discuss project prioritization. The final round of engagement is proposed through a Planning Commission or City Council workshop.
Deliverables
1. Dr
aft Outreach Plan
2. Fi
nal Outreach Plan
3. De
velopment and Deployment of Survey
instruments
4. Con
tent, meeting notices, presentations, and
documentation of up to:
a. Fo
ur (4) stakeholder workshops
b. Fo
ur (4) in-person meetings with partner
agencies/adjacent jurisdictions
c. On
e (1) Planning Commission or City Council
workshop
5. Con
tent for the Study Webpage and Facebook
Page
6. Do
cumentation of Stakeholder Engagement
Phase 4 – Draft and Final
Freight Analysis
Objective
The objective of the Freight Analysis is to develop a data- driven process for designating truck routes.
Approach
The approach will build on findings from Phase 2 whereby truck access needs, avoidance of sensitive receptors,
roadway design features, safety concerns, and other factors will be used to evaluate the compatibility of trucks on different roadways.
Scope
4.1: Truck Route Designation Process & Selection
Criteria
The truck route designation process will build upon data collected in Phase 2 and input provided through the first round of stakeholder outreach. The truck route designation process will consider access requirements to freight-
generators within and adjacent to the City, truck travel patterns, the influence logistics uses and operations in the region have on freight activity in the City, and State and federal laws that influence local truck routing decisions, truck parking activity, and warehousing development and operations.
The truck route selection criteria will be based on factors provided in Phase 2 and Phase 6, such as existing and
projected truck volumes, site access, roadway design
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
14 deficiencies, land use compatibility, conflicts with City plans, continuity/connectivity to truck routes in adjacent jurisdictions, etc.
The preferred truck routes will be further analyzed to
determine if improvements to pavement, intersections, and/ or signal operations will be needed to safely and efficiently accommodate truck traffic under both existing and future conditions. The City’s prior and current efforts to address safety will serve as an input into the selection of truck routes.
This information will also inform improvements that will be needed on corridors that serve potentially conflicting modes, such as truck routes and bike routes. The recommended
truck routes will be mapped in GIS, incorporated into the Mobility Element, and shared with Caltrans.
4.2: Truck Route Capital Improvement
Recommendations
Upon issuance of the NTP , Mark Thomas will secure
available Geographic Information System (GIS) parcel and roadway linework from the County of San Bernardino and
convert to an AutoCAD based drawing to use as the basis for all existing right-of-way and property lines. Additionally, Mark Thomas will secure available research and as-builts pertinent to the proposed truck routes. The as-builts will be the basis for roadway design improvements, as well as the pavement evaluation that will be conducted in Phase 2.
Fehr & Peers will prepare AutoTURN templates for proposed truck route intersections and develop conceptual designs to improve intersections on proposed truck routes for up to ten (10) locations. The conceptual designs will consider curb extensions, relocation of utilities, signal equipment and other street furniture, and striping and signal modifications, including the potential for truck-priority signals.
Assumptions:
Mapping provided in the Constraints and Programmed
Project Assessment will be limited to the following:
•
Exi
sting right-of-way Mapping based on County available
GIS in AutoCAD Format
• Exi
sting topographic conditions will be based upon
Google earth imagery, no mapping will occur
• Preliminary Mapping of programmed / planned projects
will be supplied only if made available by implementing agencies or their respective design staff
Fehr & Peers will prepare conceptual plans for up to 10 intersection locations . These concepts will consider
potential alterations, such as modifications to curb returns, relocation of utilities and signage, restriping, intersection widening, etc. pursuant to findings in Phases 2 and 7 .
In addition, pavement conditions and enhancements on
proposed truck routes will be evaluated. For this analysis, Fehr & Peers will use the 1993 AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Structures as the basis for assessing pavement improvements needed to support heavy-duty truck traffic on the City’s designated truck route network. Pavement
assessment will be measured in terms of “ESALs”, or
equivalent single axle loads of 18,000 pounds. The following data will be collected or estimated to assess pavement
requirements for each segment of the City’s truck route network: 1) pavement type, 2) estimated pavement layer
thicknesses, 3) pavement condition, 4) truck traffic, 5) truck weight, and 6) axle load distribution.
Next, we will estimate existing and future truck volumes, define the typical configurations of trucks operating in the City, and estimate average axle load. The axle load estimate will be based on vehicle classification, as well as instances and frequency of over-size/over-weight permits issued for operations on the City’s roadways. Fehr & Peers will coordinate with Caltrans and the City to obtain this information. The truck route pavement design standards for each segment will be developed to accommodate traffic for the next 20 years.
Planning level cost estimates for recommended
infrastructure improvements will be developed by Mark
Thomas. Improvements will be prioritized based on factors such as truck volumes and frequency of overweight trucks.
Additionally, planning level costs for right-of-way, utilities, and drainage improvements will be based upon the
Infrastructure Impact Assessment Memorandum.
De
liverables
1. Dra
ft pavement design standards for each truck
route segment/corridor
2. Fin
al pavement design standards for each truck
route segment/corridor
3. Dra
ft pavement improvements needed to bring
each truck route segment/corridor up to standard
4. Fin
al pavement improvements needed to bring
each truck route segment/corridor up to standard
Phase 5 – Truck Route
Implementation Strategy
Objective
The objective of Phase 5 is to implement identified truck route improvements expeditiously by being prepared for
funding opportunities.
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
15 Approach
Fehr & Peers recommends utilizing the
prioritizationapproach developed in Phase 4 to identify the top 10 priority truck route improvement projects.
Notifications for the availability of funding sources that align with each of the top 10 projects should be regularly monitored.
Scope
5.1: Cost Estimates
The conceptual designs prepared in Phase 4 will be
provided to Mark Thomas for the development of cost
estimates. The cost estimates will be incorporated into project data sheets for each improvement to support future funding pursuits.
5.2: Prioritization of Improvements & Phasing Plan
As part of Phase 4, a prioritized list of recommended
improvements will be identified and incorporated into the Freight Analysis. Improvements will be prioritized based on key performance indicators, such as high injury rates, congestion, and failing pavement, as well as community
priorities, such as walkability and quality of life. However, funding availability also plays a critical role. A lower ranked project may meet certain grant funding requirements, which could bump it up in priority if funding is successfully secured.
The goal of project prioritization is ultimately implementation, which is likely to occur more quickly if flexibility is retained.
Three corridors in the City (Bellegrave Boulevard, Riverside Avenue, and Etiwanda Avenue) are designated as Critical Urban Freight Corridors (CUFC) in the California Freight Mobility Plan. This designation allows improvements on
these corridors to compete for federal funding opportunities available through the USDOT discretionary funding
opportunities provided by the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. Once improvements are completed, the State can
move the CUFC designation to another corridor in need of improvements. The prioritization list will allow the City to initiate early conversations with Caltrans about moving the designation to other key corridors in the City.
The phasing plan will be based on project priorities
established in Phase 4, as well as the prioritization of improvements.
5.3: Funding Strategy and Grant Opportunities
Fehr & Peers will develop a structured approach to financing the identified truck route improvements that prioritizes the efficient use of resources while maximizing funding opportunities. This strategy will incorporate a mixture of local, state, federal, and private sources for funding truck route improvements.
Fehr & Peers has added Mark Thomas to the team to
support this task. Our firms routinely partner on the planning, design, and funding of large-scale goods movement
transportation projects across the State. We have a detailed understand of funding and financing programs and hands- on experience securing regional, state, and federal funds.
These projects include the City of Beaumont SR-60/Potrero Boulevard Interchange Phase II TCEP grant which was
awarded $33.5 million, the City of Eastvale Limonite Avenue Gap Closure LPP grant which was awarded $9.5 million,
and the City of Santa Ana Santa Ana Boulevard Grade
Separation BUILD and TIRCP grants which were awarded
$32 million.
5.4: Policy and Regulatory Recommendations
Phase 2 will provide the basis for policy and regulatory recommendations. Currently, Fehr & Peers is supporting
WRCOG with the development of cleanup language for AB
98, which could result in relief to the compliance deadline and more clarity on regulatory requirements. For this Phase, we will provide recommendations for policies to include in the Mobility Element. We will also provide the City with information about pending regulations or changes to existing regulations that impact trucking operations, industrial warehouse development, or the Mobility Element.
Deliverables
1. Imp
lementation Memorandum consisting of:
a. Ph
asing Plan for top ten (10) priority
improvements
b. Co
st estimates for improvements at up to ten
(10) locations
c. Gr
ant ready summaries for up to ten (10) truck
route improvement projects
d. Fu
nding strategy and applicable discretionary
funding programs
e. Po
licy and regulatory recommendations
Phase 6 – Mobility Plan Update
Objective
The primary objective of the Mobility Plan Update is to incorporate designated truck routes and update it to comply with the latest State regulations.
Approach
Due to the limited changes to the Mobility Element, we
recommend an approach that targets the incorporation
of designated truck routes, policies associated with truck routes, and updates pursuant to recent general plan mobility element requirements. In addition, this Phase will include traffic modeling to support an evaluation of truck route improvements and designation of the City’s high-injury
network.
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
16 Scope
6.1: Existing Conditions
Fehr & Peers’ initial work related to the General Plan Mobility Element Update will focus on the addition of truck routes, policies associated with freight activity, and improvements needed to provide safe access to truck-generating facilities throughout the City. A careful review of shared corridors, such as major roadways used by trucks and bicyclists and/ or pedestrians will be considered in the Freight Analysis. To the extent possible, trucks will be routed on corridors that are not fronted by homes, schools, parks, or other sensitive receptors, and safe separations between bicycle/pedestrian facilities and trucks will be integrated into roadway design standards.
As part of this effort, we will use the existing data to develop a background technical report documenting existing
conditions in the area. This will specifically identify existing roadway network classifications, existing and proposed
bicycle facilities, existing and proposed pedestrian networks, transit service, existing truck and rail facilities, and a safety review of the City (most notably high incident locations by mode – much of which will be provided as part of Phase 2).
We will also document available census information that is relevant to transportation, such as commute trip information, mode split information, and the relative locations of where people who live in Jurupa Valley work, and vise versa.
Fehr & Peers will utilize the latest version of the Riverside County Transportation Model (RIVCOM). The model will
be used to evaluate existing and future travel demand
on the City’s roadway network, identifying roadway
network deficiencies, and analyze level of service at study intersections and roadway segments. A VMT analysis is not anticipated to be required.
In addition, Fehr & Peers will spend up to two days in
the field reviewing traffic operations, collecting roadway geometric data, and collecting intersection control
information.
Fehr & Peers will work with the City to obtain traffic signal timing data at all study intersections. As needed, Fehr & Peers will coordinate with other appropriate agencies, such as Caltrans, Cities of Fontana, Rialto, Riverside, Colton, and Counties of San Bernardino and Riverside, to obtain relevant traffic signal timing information, as well as planning information about land use or zoning changes that would allow for more industrial development near the City’s
boundary.
Fehr & Peers will develop the following forecasts for up to 20 study intersections and 15 roadway segments:
•
Ex
isting (2025) – Based on traffic counts collected in
Phase 2
• Fu
ture Year (2050) – Based on RIVCOM with appropriate
land use modifications associated with both recently
approved and reasonably foreseeable land use/zone
changes
Fehr & Peers will complete an LOS assessment applying
the Highway Capacity Manual 7th Edition methodologies.
Intersection analysis will be performed using the Synchro analysis software and signal timing data provided by the local agencies and/or Caltrans.
This scope includes an evaluation of potential physical changes to the intersection geometries along the proposed truck routes to improve safety, access, and circulation. Fehr & Peers will identify infrastructure capacity improvements that would be needed to achieve an acceptable LOS. Fehr & Peers will work with the project team to compare proposed capacity improvements against multi-modal goals/policies of the General Plan and develop final recommendations
for infrastructure improvements. These improvements will be depicted, costed out, and incorporated into the project prioritization process (Phase 5).
6.2: Additional General Plan Requirements Since
2017
All new General Plan updates are required to incorporate SB 932. As stated in the legislation, “Upon any substantive revision of the circulation element on or after January 1, 2025, local governments are required to incorporate the principles of the Federal Highway Administration’s Safe System Approach.” Specifically, this requires the City to develop and incorporate bicycle, pedestrian, and traffic calming plans into the Mobility Element and address safety concerns on corridors with high pedestrian and bicycle
activity by identifying improvements.
The Mobility Element policies will be updated to reflect the City’s commitment to implement the improvements within
25 years pursuant to the City’s LRSP and SSARP that were completed in 2022.
6.3: Updated Mobility Element Policies
Fehr & Peers will develop the initial policies and present these policies to City staff for review. These policies will consider the latest legislative changes to General Plan Mobility Element requirements that have occurred since the City’s Mobility Element was last updated in 2017 , such as AB 98 and SB 932.
Phase 7 – CEQA Compliance
Objective
The update to the City’s General Plan Mobility Element to incorporate truck routes is a discretionary approval with potential environmental impacts, and therefore, is subject to CEQA. It is anticipated that the roadways selected for truck routes will coincide with roadways that currently carry Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
17 most of the City’s truck traffic. Additionally, since the Mobility E
lement will not include any land use changes, associated truck volumes are not anticipated to be substantially
different than projected for buildout of the 2017 General Plan. For this Phase, therefore, we concur with the City’s determination that the Mobility Element Update is likely eligible for to be processed with an EIR Addendum pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §15164.
App
roach
Mark Teague and JoAnn Hadfield have a long history of
w
orking with the City. They will work together to ensure that current efforts underway will feed into the development of truck routes citywide. The Fehr & Peers team proposes the preparation of an Addendum to the General Plan EIR (SCH# 2008091077) that incorporates by reference information
and analyses from the Etiwanda Avenue /Country Village
Road Truck Restriction Ordinance EIR (2019, SCH #
2018021020). PlaceWorks prepared the Etiwanda Avenue/
Country Village EIR, which includes a detailed review of environmental impacts to the surrounding environmental
justice communities, including Mira Loma. The Certified EIR quantified air quality, greenhouse gases, health risk and noise impacts related to restricting truck traffic on Etiwanda Avenue and Country Village Road. Based on
field investigations, this segment of Etiwanda Avenue has signage prohibiting trucks over 8 tons, but the signage is not being enforced. As previously stated, this segment is also a designated Critical Urban Freight Corridor.
The proposed project is anticipated to designate truck
routes on roadways that trucks are permitted to operate on currently. However, it is anticipated that the City’s Prohibited Truck Routes will need to be revisited pursuant to efforts that occurred following the adoption of the 2017 General Plan EIR (SCH# 2008091077).
Based on our understanding, the potential Mobility Element amendment is not anticipated to result in any new significant environmental impacts; however, if truck volumes are
shifted to corridors that currently experience lower truck volumes, emissions and noise modeling may be required
to demonstrate that the shifts result in less than significant impacts. A General Plan EIR Addendum is assumed to be
the most legally defensible, and time/cost efficient process for CEQA compliance given the Assembly Bill 98
compliance date of January 1, 2026. Provided that an
Addendum for this project is supported with substantial evidence, the Addendum would maintain the same
protection as the General Plan EIR if challenged (e.g., is more difficult to legally challenge than a Mitigated Negative Declaration).
Scope
7 .1: Draft Addendum
The Draft Addendum will follow the CEQA Guidelines
Appendix G checklist questions/topics. It will include a Project Description (Mobility Element Update) and clearly define the baseline conditions used for the analyses.
Baseline conditions for an Addendum are defined as the
conditions upon project implementation of the original
project (
e.g., buildout of the City’s General Plan). The focus
of the Addendum analysis will be to determine the potential increase in impacts, particularly to sensitive receptors, that could result in implementation of the proposed, designated truck routes. The potential impact would be the ‘net’
increase in comparison to the baseline, buildout conditions of
the General Plan .
As the objective of the Mobility Element update and AB 98, including designated truck routes, is to reduce community impacts, our scope assumes that designated truck routes would minimize/reduce truck traffic proximate to sensitive resources for most routes. Our evaluation will be based on the truck volumes to be provided by Fehr & Peers.
It is anticipated that the designation of truck routes will not create increases in community impacts, but rather,
will result in reductions in noise, safety, and emissions impacts to sensitive receptors. Air quality, greenhouse gas emissions and noise modeling, therefore, are not expected to be required, but in the event existing truck volumes are significantly shifted by truck route designations, additional air and noise modeling may be required to measure the
changes. If the modeling results in significant impacts, a mitigated negative declaration or amendment to the EIR
may be required, which would more than likely result in the City failing to meet the AB 98 deadline of January 1, 2026, for adding truck routes to the General Plan. Fehr & Peers is actively working with WROCOG, SBCTA, and the California League of Cities on AB 98 clean up language that would
incorporate a “safe harbor” provision to exempt cities that are in the process of complying from being assessed
noncompliance fines.
The Draft Addendum will be provided to the City for review and comment.
7 .2: Final Addendum
PlaceWorks will revise the Addendum to respond to City
review comments. Our cost estimate assumes one round of revisions in response to one consolidated set of comments provided by the City.
7.3: Project Coordination and SB 18 Consultation
Project Coordination and Meeting/Hearing Attendance
Our cost estimate assumes that our environmental team
project manager (
JoAnn Hadfield) will participate in
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
18 coordination meetings as required with the team (cost estimate assumes up to six (6) meetings) supported by Mark Teague for streamlined coordination with other ongoing
efforts. Nicole Vermillion and Chris Shields (representing AQ/GHG and Noise, respectively) will participate in up to two (2) meetings each. Our project manager will attend up to two (2) public hearings.
The project management budget assumes our project
coordination, environmental team management and contract management for a period involvement in this project for up to 7 months.
SB-18 Tribal Consultation
While an Addendum does not trigger the AB-52
requirements for Tribal consultation, all General Plan
Amendment must comply with SB-18. PlaceWorks will
complete the Native American Heritage Commission
(NAHC) on-line form requesting a tribal contact list. Using the addresses on the list from NAHC, PlaceWorks will draft letters (on City letterhead) to each of the tribes on the NAHC list inquiring whether they want consultation. Following the consultation meeting (or more typically a conference call), PlaceWorks will provide the written outcome of the process and a record for the project. Completion of the SB 18
process is needed prior to acting on the project.
Deliverables
1. Ad
ministrative Draft and Public Draft Addendum
2. SB
-18 Tribal Consultation Letters
3. No
tice of Determination
4. No
tice of Completion
Phase 8 – City Council
Review & Approval
Objective
The City Council hearing will serve two purposes: 1) an opportunity for the community to learn about the truck
routing evaluation and selection process, ask questions, and provide feedback and input, and 2) to comply with State requirements for amending the City’s General Plan.
Approach
As early as the kick-off meeting, Fehr & Peers will work with the City’s project manager to identify potential dates for City Council review and approval of the Truck Routes and General Plan Mobility Element Update. The project schedule of deliverables will align with the City Council hearing.
Scope
As mentioned in the Phase 3 scope, preliminary truck
route findings and recommendations will be presented to the public at a Planning Commission, City Council, or joint Safety Commission/Planning Commission/City Council
workshop prior to being placed on hearing agendas. This workshop will provide the public and the City’s appointed and elected representatives with an opportunity to ask
questions and provide feedback, and also for Safety and/ or Planning Commissioners and City Councilmembers to
recommend or direct changes to the proposed truck routes.
The Fehr & Peers team will develop presentations and
assist with drafting staff reports for the workshop and up to three meetings/hearings (e.g., Safety Commission, Planning Commission, and City Council) as determined by the City.
The meeting agendas and presentations will be posted to the Project Website and Facebook page.
Deliverables
1. Ag
endas, presentations and meeting notes for one
workshop and three public hearings
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
19 Page left intentionally blank. The proposed schedule is located on the following page.
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
20 21
Schedule
June M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 December M8 M9 M10 M11 M12 June M14 M15 M16 M17 M18 M19 January Tasks/Days 15 15 60 90 120 150 180 195 210 240 270 300 330 365 380 395 425 455 485 515 545 575 605 635 Task 1 Project Management
1.1 Kick-Off Meeting
1.2 Regular Project Meetings
1.3 Monthly Reporting & Invoicing
Task 2 Existing Conditions
2.1 Existing Regulations & Truck Restrictions
2.2 Freight Generators & Truck Travel Patterns
2.3 Truck Involved Collisions & Safety Concerns
2.4 Design Considerations & Pavement Conditions
Task 3 Stakeholder Outreach
3.1 Develop Outreach Plan & SAC
3.2 Conduct Outreach & Summarize Findings
Task 4 Freight Analysis
4.1 Truck Route Designation Process
4.2 Truck Route Capital Improvements
Task 5 Truck Route Implementation Strategy
5.1 Cost Estimates
5.2 Prioritization & Phasing Plan
5.3 Funding Strategy & Grant Opportunities
5.4 Policy & Regulatory Recommendations
Task 6 Mobility Plan Update
6.1 Existing Conditions
6.2 Additional Requirements
6.3 Updated Mobility Element Policies
Task 7 CEQA Compliance
7.1 Technical Analysis
7. 2 Addendum
7. 3 SB-18 Tribal Consultation
Task 8 City Council Review & Approval
8.1 Commission Hearing
8.2 City Council Hearing
Kick-Off Meeting
Pop-Up Meetings City Council
SAC Meeting Planning CommissionKey:
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
22 6. References
City of Beaumont Truck Routing Study
April 2024 – September 2024 | Project Complete
Client: City of Beaumont
Client Contact: Robert Vestal, Director of Public Works, City of Beaumont, (951) 769-8522, [email protected] Fehr & Peers assisted the City of Beaumont with researching existing truck related policies in the California Vehicle Code and other State regulations. Fehr & Peers then developed a systematic procedure to identify truck routes and intersection geometry of potential trucks, and completed a recommended truck route system based on truck length and weight that are legal in California versus those listed in the Surface Transportation Assistance Act (STAA).
Fehr & Peers also led the development of a clean freight strategy for the city. This included frequent coordination with the State’s Department of Environmental Quality to identify greenhouse gas reduction strategies that could be incentivized for future developers. The strategies range from electrified truck parking, alternative fueling infrastructure, and clean vehicle purchase subsidies, to clean construction equipment, dust control protocols, cool roofs, and community mitigation grants.
WRCOG/SBTCA AB 98 Implementation
February 2025 – Ongoing
Client: Western Riverside Council of Governments and San Bernardino County Transportation Authority Client Contact: Christopher Gray, Deputy Executive Director, WRCOG, (951) 675-9409, [email protected] Josh Lee, Deputy Director of Planning and Regional Programs, SBTCA, (909) 884-8276, [email protected] Fehr & Peers is currently providing SBCTA and WRCOG and their member jurisdictions with complying with Assembly Bill 98 (AB 98). This effort, among other provisions, specifies which types of roadways can be designated as truck routes and requires general plan circulation elements to be updated with designated truck routes. Some SBCTA and WRCOG cities and the unincorporated Counties of San Bernardino and Riverside, have a compliance deadline of January 1, 2026. In addition to the General Plan Update requirement, AB 98 also specifies more stringent building and siting requirements for the development of industrial warehouses that need to be incorporated into local agency codes. As part of this effort, we have developed a checklist for member agencies to use, accompanied by model language to incorporate into their building and zoning codes. We are actively working with all member agencies to develop cleanup language, including a “safe harbor” provision that would allow cities to avoid the non-compliance fine of $50,000 if they are in the process of updating their General Plan.
City of Beaumont
Truck Routes: Select Turning Movements
WB-67 Design Vehicle
Figure 8
1:50
CONCEPTUAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION. ADDITIONAL
DETAILED ANALYSIS AND ENGINEERING DESIGN REQUIRED.
LUIS ESTRADA ROAD
BEAUMONT AVENUE
Steering Angle
Lock to Lock Time
Articulating Angle
WB-40
Trailer Track
Tractor Track
Trailer Width
Tractor Width
12.503.00
feet
8.00 8.00 :
8.00 8.00
:
:
:
0.00 3.00 25.50
7.50 33.00
:
:
: 6.0
20.3 70.0
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
23 Caltrans Freight Study
August 2024 – Ongoing
Client: Caltrans
Client Contact: Tracy Frost, Program Manager, Caltrans, (209) 948-7543, [email protected] Fehr & Peers as the prime consultant, with Cambridge Systematics as a subconsultant, are providing Caltrans district and headquarters freight planning staff the support needed to implement the California Freight Mobility Plan (CFMP) 2023, California Sustainable Freight Action Plan (CSFAP), and the California Transportation Plan (CTP) 2050. Technical activities and deliverables include the following:
•
Inv
entory of Assets, Projects, and Performance Measures requested by HQ and several district • Imp
roved Truck Routes in Disadvantaged Communities requested by HQ and several districts • ZE
V Infrastructure Plan requested by District 7
• Tr
uck Parking Study Implementation requested by Districts 7 ,8,12 Specifically for District 8, Fehr & Peers has developed draft truck parking evaluation criteria (shown in the table below) to assist with identifying truck parking solutions by type and location, and a process for prioritizing truck parking solutions.
As part of this effort, we have used big data (Geotab) to identify where trucks are parking and for how long to develop estimates of truck parking spaces needed in the region.
Caltrans District 8 is eager to work with partner agencies, and specifically, local jurisdictions that have to ability to implement, approve, and/or deny truck parking solutions, such as the development of truck parking facilities, requiring off-street truck staging areas as part of new truck-generating development approvals, and allowing on-street truck parking. Local agencies control entitlements, on-street parking, and land use and zoning, and Caltrans would like to work together to understand existing and future truck parking shortages and develop and implement solutions.
Criteria Sub-Criteria / Definition Data Source Purpose
Tier 1: Geographic Prioritization Based on Need
Peak Parking Demand At designated facilities CSTPS Determine if there is excess capacity in the area Peak Parking Demand Undesignated parking on all
roads
Geotab (from Caltrans) One of the best indicators that designated facilities don’t exist, lack capacity, or lack needed amenities
Peak Parking Demand Long-term parking Vehicle registration Determine where long-term parking facilities are needed for owner-operators and small trucking
companies
Safety Crashes CSTPS Prioritize based on safety conditions Strategic Priority Proximity to major freight
corridor
AADTT (from Caltrans)
and stakeholder input
Prioritize areas important to freight mobility and
economic goals
Equity n/a CalEnviroScreen, EQI 1.0 Prioritize historically underserved communities Tier 2: Strategy/Site Specific Prioritization
Proximity Proximity to other truck
parking locations
CSTPS Include size and utilization of those facilities to determine if they can absorb additional capacity
Right of Way ROW constraints Caltrans ROW and
District Staff
Assist with cost estimate and project readiness
Cost Planning level cost estimate of
implementation
Approximations from
CSTPS estimates and
other sources
Cost portion of high level assessment of costs and
benefits
Additional Spaces Number of parking spaces
added
Approximations from
CSTPS estimates and
other sources
Benefit consideration of high level assessment of costs and benefits
Project Readiness n/a Qualitative assessment Determine how quickly it can be implemented Draft Evaluation Criteria
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
24 City of Rancho Cucamonga SE Industrial Quadrant Environmental Impact Report
July 2024 – Ongoing
Client: City of Rancho Cucamonga
Client Contact: Jason Welday, PE, TE, Director of Engineering Services, City of Rancho Cucamonga, (909) 774-4011, [email protected]
Fehr & Peers prepared LOS and VMT analysis to support the development of three industrial sites in the Southeast Industrial Quadrant in Rancho Cucamonga. We identified intersection operations with and without the project and what local infrastructure improvements would be required to provide adequate traffic operations in the study area. We prepared VMT estimates and identified mitigation measures to support the CEQA documentation. We also tested multiple project alternatives and provided transportation metrics to support the air quality, noise, and GHG analyses.
Jurupa Valley Project Experience
Fehr & Peers has worked with the City of Jurupa Valley with planning and engineering efforts for nearly a decade. In that time, we have assisted the City with the following projects:
•
Ju
rupa Valley Citywide Corridors Study
• Ped
ley and Mission Intersection VMT Assessment
• Ped
ley Town Center Plan
• Ju
rupa Valley Circulation Master Plan for Bike and Pedestrians: Fehr & Peers provided assistance with transportation planning activities related to the development of the proposed Riverside Community College District (RCCD) Inland Empire Technical Trade Center Community College Master Plan in Jurupa Valley, CA. In addition to providing support with on site circulation, site access and parking, Fehr & Peers prepared a full transportation impact analysis that was compliant with CEQA and the City’s General Plan LOS Policy
Mobility Element Update Experience in San Bernardino and Riverside Counties Fehr & Peers has completed the Mobility Element Update as part of the General Plan Update for the following municipalities in San Barnardino and Riverside Counties:
•
Ap
ple Valley
• Bar
stow
• Be
aumont
• Co
achella
• Ch
ino
• Cor
ona
• Ea
stvale
• He
speria
• Lak
e Elsinore
• Mo
ntclair
• Mo
reno Valley
• Mu
rietta
• No
rco
• Ont
ario
• Pa
lm Desert
• Pa
lm Springs
• Ranc
ho Cucamonga
• San
Berardino
County
• Up
land
• Yu
cca Valley
City of Rancho Cucamonga
GENERAL PLAN
Revised Public Review Draft
September 2021
Foundational values defining the vision of our world class community Health, Equity, and Stewardship
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
25 7. Resource Allocation
Name
Task 1 Task 2 Task 3 Task 4 Task 5 Task 6 Task 7 Task 8 Total Fehr & Peers
Principal 8 6 6 6 6 6 4 12 54
Senior Associate II 12 16 16 32 32 24 8 12 152
Associate 16 4 16 8 44
Senior Engineer/ Planner 24 32 18 40 60 24 8 206
Engineer/Planner III 8 80 88
Engineer/Planner II 16 20 24 60
Engineer/ Planner I 24 16 40
Project Coordinator 40 40
Intern 16 16 16 16 16 80
Subtotal 84 134 76 122 146 158 20 24 764
PlaceWorks
Principal 75 14 89
Associate Principal 13 2 15
Senior Engineer 45 2 47
Editor 7 7
Graphics 16 16
Subtotal 156 18 174
Mark Thomas
Project Manager 6 2 8
Senior Project Manager 28 30 58
Project Engineer 4 4
Design Engineer II 8 8
Design Engineer I 108 68 176
Funding Manager 8 8
Sr. Funding Specialist 44 44
Project Accountant 8 8
Project Coordinator 8 8
Subtotal 158 112 52 322
Sargent Town Planning
Senior Principal 2 2 4
Principal/ Project Director 4 6 24 8 42
Associate Prinicipal/ PM 16 16 40 16 88
Senior Planner 24 40 64
Designer 8 36 44
Subtotal 22 30 124 66 242
GRAND TOTAL
PROJECT 106 322 200 234 198 224 176 42 1,502
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
26 8. Fee Proposal
Fehr & Peers Fee Proposal is uploaded in a separate attachment.
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
9. Proposers Signature Page
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
10. Certification of Non Collusion
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
12
dd,D
Ed
EKEͲK>>h^/KE
>Zd/KE
NON-COLLUSION DECLARATION TO BE
EXECUTED BY BIDDER AND SUBMITTED WITH BID
The undersigned declares:
I am the _________________ [Declarant’s title] of _____________, the party making the foregoing Bid.
The Bid is not made in the interest of, or on behalf of, any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization, or corporation. The Bid is genuine and not collusive or sham. The Bidder has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other bidder to put in a false or sham bid. The Bidder has not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any bidder or anyone else to put in a sham bid, or to refrain from proposing. The Bidder has not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the Bid price of the Bidder or any other bidder, or to fix any overhead, profit, or cost element of the Bid price, or of that of any other bidder. All statements contained in the Bid are true. The Bidder has not, directly or indirectly, submitted his or her Bid price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, to any corporation, partnership, company, association, organization, bid depository, or to any member or agent thereof, to effectuate a collusive or sham Bid, and has not paid, and will not pay, any person or entity for such purpose.
Any person executing this declaration on behalf of a Bidder that is a corporation, partnership, joint venture, limited liability company, limited liability partnership, or any other entity, hereby represents that he or she has full power to execute, and does execute, this declaration on behalf of the Bidder.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration is executed on _______________[date], at ____________________[city],
______________________[state].
^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ WƌŝŶƚEĂŵĞ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ dŝƚůĞ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ ĚĚƌĞƐƐ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ dĞůĞƉŚŽŶĞEŽ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ Principal Fehr & Peers
RiversideApril 8, 2025
California
Jason Pack, TE
Principal
3750 University Ave., Suite 225, Riverside, CA 92501
(951) 274-4800
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
11. Proposed Agreement
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
11. Proposed Agreement
Fehr & Peers proposes the following modifications to the City’s standard consultant agreement:
1. Performance. (Page 1 of the Sample Agreement)
Changes Requested: Consultant shall at all time faithfully, competently and to the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Consultant shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in perform its services in accordance with the care, skill, and diligence ordinarily exercised by professionals providing similar services in the same or similar locale and under similar circumstances as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement.
Reason for Changes: We are requesting certain portions be struck in this Section because they create a heightened standard of care the Consultant would have to meet in its services for the City. By our markups above, we are providing the definition of the prevailing, professional standard of care consultants are to meet in their professional services. The stricken language creates a heightened standard of care that is unknown and undefined. Falling short of the prevailing, professional standard of care is the definition of negligence. Professional Liability Insurance only covers the insured professional’s negligence in the performance of its services. It does not cover contractual obligations to meet a standard higher than the prevailing standard of care.
2. Suspension or Termination of Agreement Without Cause. (Paragraph 2 on Page 2 of the Sample Agreement) Changes Requested: In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work performed is in accordance with this Agreement of value to the City
. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City pursuant to Section 4.
Reason for Changes: The City’s determination as to what work is of value to the City is subjective. In the event of an early termination, the Consultant should be paid for the services it performed to the date of termination that are in accordance with the objective terms, conditions, and criteria in the Agreement.
3. Indemnification. (Pages 3-4 in the Sample Agreement) Changes Requested:
Indemnity for Design
Professional Services. In connection with its design professional services, but subject to the limitations of Section 2 of this Agreement, Consultant shall hold harmless and indemnify City, its elected officials, officers, and employees, designated volunteers and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role City officials (collectively “Indemnitees”), with respect to any and all claims, demands, liabilities, losses, costs or expenses, including reimbursement of reasonable attorney fees and costs of defense (collectively “Claims”), including but not limited to Claims relating to death or injury to any person and injury to any property, to the extent such Claims are caused by which to the extent arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of Consultant or any of its officers, employee, sub consultants, or agents in the performance or its of their professional services under this Agreement.
In no event shall the cost to defend charged to the Consultant exceed the Consultant’s proportionate percentage of fault as set forth in California Civil Code 2782.8.
Other Indemnities. In connection with any and all claims, demands, damages, liabilities, losses, costs or expenses, including reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs of defense (collectively, “Damages” hereinafter) not covered by Paragraph 9.A. above, and arising out of Consultant’s physical activities and operations in connection with its performance of this Agreement other than its performance of professional services, but subject to the limitations of Section 2 of this Agreement, Consultant shall
defend, hold harmless and indemnify the Indemnitees with respect to any and all Claims Damages, including but not limited to, Claims Damages relating to death or injury to any person and injury to any property, which arise out of, pertain to, or relate to acts or omissions of Consultant or any of its officers, employees, subcontractors, or agents in their physical activities and operations in the performance of this Agreement, except for such loss or damage Damages arising from the negligence
or willful misconduct of the City, as determined by final arbitration or court decision or by the agreement of the parties.
Consultant shall defend Indemnitees in any action or actions filed in connection with any such Claims Damages with counsel
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
of City’s choice, and shall pay all costs and expenses, including all reasonable attorneys’ fees and experts’ costs actually incurred in connection with such defense. Consultant’s duty to defend pursuant to this Section 9.B. shall apply independent of any prior, concurrent or subsequent misconduct, negligent acts, errors or omissions ofr Indemnitees.
Reasons for Changes: By our markups we are modifying the first part of the indemnification Section to cover all professional services performed by the Consultant, and not just design professional services. The Consultant awarded this contract may be performing a combination of transportation planning (i.e., non-design professional) services and traffic engineering (i.e., design professional) services. However, transportation planning services, like design professional/engineering services, are still considered professional services. We have coverage under our Professional Liability Insurance for both our transportation planning and engineering services. However, our coverage, like all Professional Liability Policies, is not triggered unless we cause damages due to our negligence in our professional services. There has to be negligence on our part in order for our Professional Liability Policy to provide insurance coverage for this indemnity obligation. Without our changes to the first paragraph, for claims against the City arising out of our transportation planning services, we could be stuck indemnifying the City in accordance with the second paragraph, which does not have a negligence threshold. We would be paying for this indemnity obligation out of pocket with no insurance available to assist us. That could bankrupt a smaller firm.
To clarify this indemnity obligation, we have modified this indemnity obligation to create a bifurcated indemnity obligation to cover the risks associated with the work and to align with the various policies of insurance that would cover these risks. With our changes, the first paragraph would apply to all of our professional services for the City, including transportation planning and engineering services, and would be covered by our Professional Liability Insurance due to the negligence trigger in the first paragraph. With our changes to the second paragraph, this creates an indemnity obligation arising out of our on-site physical activities and operations in our work for the City. If we cause a personal injury on-site, on-site property damage, or one of our employees is injured while working on site, an applicable insurance policy of ours would pay for the damages the City suffers resulting from this, such as our General Liability, Auto Liability, Workers’ Compensation, or Employer’s Liability insurance. No finding of negligence on our part is necessary to trigger coverage under those policies for damages we cause in our physical activities and operations.
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
Resumes
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering,
University of California, Davis, 1999
REGISTRATIONS
Licensed Traffic Engineer, State of California
(TR2402)
RECOGNITIONS
WTS Honorable Ray LaHood Award Winner
(Man of the Year) – Inland Empire Chapter
(2023)
PRESENTATIONS
VMT Related Presentations:
• 2023 UCLA Land Use Law and
Policy Conference
• 2022 National APA
• 2022 Western ITE
• 2022 CEAC Public Works Officers
Institute
• 2022 SBCOG City/County
Conference
• 2019 California APA
• 2019 CSU Facilities Conference
Future of Transportation Presentations:
• 2018 SBCTA City/County
Conference
• 2017 WRCOG Planning Conference
Parking Presentations:
• 2018 OC Planning Directors
Conference
Emergency Evacuation Assessment – 2022
National APA Conference
Multi-Modal Levels of Service – ULI SCIC
ABOUT
Jason D. Pack, P.E., is a Principal with Fehr & Peers located in Southern California. He is actively involved in a wide variety of project work but also finds time to lead the firm’s research and development efforts in Emergency Evacuation assessment. Jason has an extensive background in travel demand forecasting, traffic operations assessment (including micro-simulation assessment), VMT analysis, big data analysis, transit ridership forecasting, and transportation impact studies involving NEPA and CEQA. His focus is to utilize his experience and the technical resources of the company to help clients answer their toughest questions related to mobility.
His recent work has included forecasting and operations assessment for large infrastructure improvements, developing recommendations for SB 743 implementation (California's new requirements to consider VMT as an impact metric under CEQA), assisting agencies with establishing VMT banks/exchanges, emergency evacuation assessment to respond to new legislative requirements (SB 99 and AB 747) and development of innovative transportation policies to assist City's advancing transportation into the future.
PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Specific Plans/Master Plans/Corridor Plans
Jason has completed assessment for more than 20 specific plans, master plans, and corridor plans. Key projects are identified below:
• Beach Boulevard Corridor Specific Plan - Evaluated a land use plan along Beach Blvd in Anaheim including vehicle and multi-modal capacity assessment
• MAG High Capacity Transit Corridors Sustainability Study – Evaluating the benefits of providing transit oriented development along the high capacity transit corridors in the greater Phoenix area
• RTC of Southern Nevada High Capacity Transit Study – Evaluating the benefits of providing transit oriented development along the high capacity transit corridors in the Las Vegas area
• Long Beach Boulevard Corridor Specific Plan – Completing the transportation recommendations and assessment for this corridor in the City of Long Beach including extensive multi-modal assessment • Cal Poly Pomona Master Plan – Completed the transportation recommendations and assessment of the proposed University Master Plan Jason Pack, TE
Principal
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
• Holt Boulevard Corridor Plan – Assessing the corridor in the City of Ontario to consider multi-modal
opportunities along the corridor (including a Bus Rapid Transit application)
• Wine Country Community Plan – Assisted Riverside
County in developing a travel demand forecasting
model and evaluation of the plan for the Temecula
Wine Country Area
• CollegeTown Specific Plan – Assessing redevelopment
of the block south of the Cal State Fullerton Campus
including the closure of Nutwood Avenue, application of a street car through the project, and mixed-use
development on the site (including Hope International
University, retail, housing, and other development
opportunities)
• San Bernardino Bus Rapid Transit TOD Overlay Study –
Assisting in developing transportation strategies in
support of TOD along the SBx BRT system
General Plans
Jason has worked on a wide variety of General Plans throughout the state of California, including:
• City of Rancho Cucamonga
• City of Palm Springs
• City of Indio
• City of Moreno Valley
• City of Carlsbad
• City of Redlands
• City of Corona
• City of Montclair
• City of Westminster
• County of San Bernardino
• City of Fountain Valley
• City of San Marcos
• City of Chico
• City of Saratoga
• City of Rancho Cordova
Mo
st of these projects included Complete Street elements, extensive travel demand forecasting, and some level of multi- modal transportation assessment.
Interchange and Corridor Studies
Jason has completed the Traffic Report for numerous
transportation infrastructure studies throughout California. The most notable of these studies are described below:
• San Bernardino County Transportation Authority
(SBCTA), I-15 Express Lanes PS&E, San Bernardino
County, CA.
• Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC), I- 15 Express Lanes Southern Extension (ELPSE) PA&ED,
Riverside County, CA.
• I-15 Corridor Operations Project (COP) PA&ED, Corona, CA
• I
-15
Interim Corridor Operations Project (ICOP) PA&ED,
Corona, CA
• I-10 Truck Climbing Lane PA&ED and PS&E, Yucaipa, CA
• I-10 Mt. Vernon PA&ED, Colton, CA
• SR-60 Archibald PSR/PDS, PA&ED, PS&E Ontario, CA
• I-10/Alabama PSR/PDS and PA&ED, Redlands, CA
• I-15 Central (SR-74) PA&ED and PS&E, Lake Elsinore, CA • I-15 Main Street Electrical Support, Lake Elsinore, CA • I-15 Nichols PSR/PDS, Lake Elsinore, CA
• I-15 Franklin PS&E and environmental revalidation, Lake Elsinore, CA
• SR-210 Victoria PA&ED, Highland, CA
• I-10 Wildwood PSR and PA&ED, Yucaipa, CA
• I-10 Cherry Valley PA&ED, Calimesa, CA
• I-10 Pennsylvania DEER Support, Beaumont, CA
• I-10 Highland Springs PA&ED, Beaumont, CA
• I-10 Monroe PSR/PDS and PA&ED, Indio, CA
• I-10 Jackson PSR/PDS and PA&ED, Indio, CA
• SR-60 Rubidoux PSR/PDS, Jurupa Valley, CA
• SR-60 Redlands PSR/PDS, Moreno Valley, CA
• I-215 Harley Knox PA&ED, Perris, CA
• I-215 McCall PSR/PDS and PA&ED, Menifee, CA
• I-215 Garbani PSR/PDS, Menifee, CA
• Monterey Avenue Signal Coordination Study, Palm
Desert, CA
• OCTA Main Street Grade Separation Study, Orange, CA
• OCTA Ball Road Grade Separation Study, Anaheim, CA
• Rock Springs Bridge Study, San Bernardino County, CA
• Avenue 66 Grade Separation Study, Riverside County,
CA
• SR-32 Project Study Report (PSR), Chico, CA
• Rancho California Roundabout Corridor, Temecula Wine
Country, CA
• Ethanac Corridor Study, Riverside County, CA
CEQA/NEPA Assessment
Jason has completed transportation assessments for over 150 projects in support of CEQA or NEPA documentation. These include impact assessment to support negative declarations, transportation sections for EIRs, and transportation sections for EISs or joint EIR/EISs.
Jason has actively been involved in assisting jurisdictions with SB 743 implementation. Example projects are noted below:
• SBCTA SB 743 Countywide VMT SB 743 Implementation
Phase I, CA
• SBCTA SB 743 Countywide VMT SB 743 Implementation
Phase II (VMT mitigation bank/exchange program), CA
• WRCOG VMT SB 743 Implementation Study, CA
• North Orange County Collaborative VMT SB 743
Implementation Study/Guidelines, CA
• CSU SB 743 Guidelines, CA
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
Jolene Hayes, AICP
Senior Associate | Project Manager
EDUC ATION
M.C.R.P., City and Regional Planning,
University of Texas at Arlington, 1999
B.A., Political Science, University of Texas at
Arlington, 1997
REGISTRATIONS
American Institute of Certified Planners
(AICP), #26392
AF FIL IATIONS
Transportation Research Board (AT045) –
Committee Chair
American Planning Association/AICP
Women’s Transportation Seminar,
Orange/San Diego Counties
Urban Land Institute – Public Sector Chair for
ULI Orange County Young Leaders Group
(2006 – 2008)
ABOUT
Jolene, located in our Orange County office of Fehr & Peers, has more than 25 years of experience in local, regional and statewide transportation, land use and goods movement planning, environmental analysis, and implementation. With a focus on collaboration and stakeholder input, Jolene focuses on the development of sustainable transportation solutions. Her work frequently requires a deep level of understanding community concerns, industry needs, and State economic and environmental sustainability goals to develop cross-cutting solutions that reduce greenhouse gases while fostering economic vitality. Throughout her career, Jolene has planned, prioritized and implemented a variety of transportation projects ranging from traffic calming and bikeway improvements to major freight infrastructure projects. She is well-versed in local, regional and national issues and understands the importance of balancing the movement of goods and people on railways, roadways and waterways from a local, port, regional, state and national perspective.
P ROJEC T EX P ERIENC E
Southern California Strategic Freight Plan
Ms. Hayes is the Project Manager for this study for Caltrans that covers Districts 7, 8 and 12 (Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino and Riverside Counties) in Southern California. The study intends to delve deeper into local issues, projects and programs to further the implementation of the recently adopted California statewide freight plan, the California Freight Mobility Plan. A key focus of this plan, in line with the Governor’s Executive Order 20-04, is to identify strategies for greening freight to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and air quality impacts on local communities. Ms.
Hayes led this element.
San Diego and Imperial Counties 2021 Gateway Study Update Ms. Hayes is the project manager for this San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) led effort to analyze changes in cross-border freight flows that have occurred over the past five years. Supported by IHS Markit’s TRANSEARCH data analytics team, the study will investigate the impacts of international trade policy changes, develop future scenarios, update both the SANDAG and Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) RTP models to reflect shifts in truck trips, and develop projects and programs for inclusion in SANDAG’s 2021 RTP.
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
California Freight Mobility Plan Update
Ms. Hayes served as a technical expert on port intermodal operations, stakeholder engagement, and policy development for Caltrans’ CFMP Update, an update to its statewide freight plan. As part of this effort, she conducted interviews with 25 industry stakeholders and obtained survey responses from another 100 stakeholders, including governmental agencies, industry (rail, trucking, ports, airports, 3PLs, BCOs, etc), and community groups and coordinated with the technical team to develop the policy recommendations section.
Port of Long Beach Port Master Plan Update and PEIR
(Long Beach, CA)
Ms. Hayes provided guidance on the development of the
PortTAM model scenarios and the necessary VMT outputs for AQ and noise, identified the related projects that effect traffic, and recommended the traffic impact analysis methodology. She coordinated the VMT outputs with the AQ analysis team and drafted the traffic section of the programmatic environmental impact report. She continues to support the Port through the development of responses to comments in advance of release of the Final PEIR in Spring 2020.
Fontana Logistics Facility Peer Review
As part of a peer review team for the City of Fontana, Ms. Hayes peer reviewed a traffic impact study for a proposed two million square-foot industrial warehouse development. The
controversial project has been under consideration for eight years. The peer review focused on the accuracy of trip distribution assumptions, safety, and site access.
San Joaquin Valley I-5/SR 99 Goods Movement
Corridor Study
Ms. Hayes served as the Project Manager for this study while with another firm, which entailed a comprehensive analysis of the existing conditions of goods movement in the Central Valley along a 200+ mile of I-5 and SR-99. (Fehr & Peers was a sub on this project.) This analysis incorporated GPS data (Streetlight) for understanding activity to/from freight clusters within the Central Valley, investigated freight bottlenecks, reliability and safety, and identified projects to address these concerns.
HTA Truck Turn-Time Study Technical Review (Long
Beach and Los Angeles, CA)
While with another firm, Ms. Hayes peer reviewed the
methodology and analysis of a truck queuing analysis for estimating and tracking truck-turn-times at 14 marine terminals in the Ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles. , which included use of truck (GPS) data and radio-frequency identification (RFID) tags on the containers. This information led to better communication between the Harbor Trucking Association (HTA) members, the Port, and the marine terminal operators to develop strategies for reducing truck queuing and idling time within the port complex. •
OTHER REL EVANT F REIGH T P ROJEC T EXP ERIENC E
• Principal Investigator for National Cooperation Highway Research Program 08-141, A Guidebook for Local Truck Parking Regulations (current)
• Sustainability task lead for the Utah Inland Port Strategic Business Plan (2020)
• Clean Freight Fueling task lead, I-580 Sustainable Corridor Study for Alameda County Transportation Commission (current)
• Technical advisor, California Central Coast Freight Plan (current) • Associate in Charge for the Port of Gray’s Harbor, WA rail expansion project (current)
• Vancouver, WA industrial warehouse study (current)
• California Statewide Freight Plan (aka, California Freight Mobility Plan Update) (2019)
• Project manager for the Pier B Rail Yard PIDP Grant Application – awarded $52.3M in 2021
• Project manager, Utah Electrified Truck Parking Facility CMAQ Grant Application – awarded $3.5M in 2021
• Project manager, Terminal Island Wye Rail Project PIDP Grant Application – awarded $14.5M in 2019
• POLB staff and author of the Ocean Boulevard Triple Track (Green Port Gateway) TIGER II Grant Application – awarded $17M in 2012
• Port of Charleston, SC, Wando Wharf TIGER Grant Application – awarded $10.8M in 2014
• Providence Rhode Island Amtrak Station TIGER Planning Grant Application – awarded $900K in 2014
• Gerald Desmond Bridge Funding – wrote TIGER and Metro grant applications, Caltrans Local HBBR application, TIFIA LOI and TIFIA application
• Candlestick Park Redevelopment RAISE grant application (2022) • Contra Costa Transportation Commission Mega grant
application (2022)
• Carson District (Industrial Warehouse) Project EIR (current) • Lehigh Project (Port of Stockton, CA) EIR (current)
• Trammel Crow Industrial Warehouse EIR (current)
• Ontario (California) Airport South (DHL) Cargo Facility EIR (2022) • Southern California Strategic Freight Plan (2020)
• City of Ontario General Plan Update and EIR (2022)
• City of Los Angeles Complete Streets for 12 Priority Safety Corridors (2020)
• Virginia DOT Truck Parking Study (current)
• National Cooperative Highway Research Program research on Freight Autonomous Vehicles (current)
• Southern California Strategic Freight Plan (2020)
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
Fatemeh Ranaiefar, PhD
Senior Associate | Task 3 Lead
EDUC ATION
PhD in Transportation Science, University of
California, Irvine, 2013
M.S.c. (Eng.) in Industrial Engineering,
Socioeconomic
System Eng., Tarbiat Modares University,
Tehran, Iran
B.Sc. (Eng.) in Industrial Engineering, Alzahra
University, Tehran, Iran
AF FIL IATIONS
Standing Committee on Urban Freight
Transportation (AT025) – Communication
Coordinator
Standing Committee on Freight
Transportation Planning and Logistics
(AT015) - Research coordinator
Adjunct Faculty at University of Southern
California (USC)
EX PERTISE
• Freight Planning
• Freight Data Analytics
• Freight Performance Measures
• Multimodal Corridor Planning
• Commodity Flow Analysis
• Truck Parking Demand Analysis
• Travel Demand Modeling
• Travel Pattern Studies
• Traffic Analysis
• Customized VMT analysis
ABOUT
Fatemeh Ranaiefar is a senior associate with Fehr & Peers’ Long Beach office. She started and leads the Firm’s research and development freight discipline group at Fehr & Peers. She specializes in transportation modeling, transportation data analytics, developing performance measures, and building decision support tools for prioritizing projects to address transportation issues.
She has experience managing large scale projects involving coordination with various groups of public and private stakeholders and community organizations. She also managed/or served as task lead for several statewide, regional and multi- jurisdiction corridor studies, impacts fee programs, truck route study, travel demand model development, traffic forecast, goods movement plan, truck parking study, origin- destination study and National Cooperative Highway Research Programs studies.
She is passionate about research, education and mentoring next generation of Transportation enthusiasts. She serves on the multiple TRB committees and teaches transportation modeling to Master students at USC. She has provided several training workshops for public agencies’ and student, empowering them to use transportation data analytics and enhanced visual infographics in their decision-making process.
P ROJEC T EX P ERIENC E
California State Freight Mobility Plan (CFMP 2020)
Ms. Ranaiefar lead a team national experts to assist Caltrans in developing CFMP 2020 to create a powerful and effective instrument for freight mobility improvement. The team’s approach is based on effective public relationships and targeted, productive industry involvement to merge public and private visions and define implementable action steps. Ms. Ranaiefar worked closely with the Caltrans office of freight planning, California Freight Advisory Committee (CFAC), California Transportation Commission, sea ports, trucking associations, local representative of industries to understand and addressed their issues in the plan. Reducing freight’s urban footprint and impacts on communities and environment while enhancing the competitiveness of the freight industry in California was a major target of the plan.
Caltrans Freight Technical Support (Statewide, CA)
Mrs. Ranaiefar is Leading the team supporting Caltrans Districts with implementation of the CFMP 2023. The project includes Big Data for Freight Planning requested , Inventory of Assets, Projects, and Performance Measures, Freight Focused Equity Engagement requested, Improved Truck Routes in Disadvantaged Communities, ZEV Infrastructure Plan, Truck Parking Study Implementation, Dataset Development for Enhancing Trade
.
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
SCAG Strategic Freight Framework (SCAG, CA)
As part of a collaborative team, Fehr & Peers supported SCAG in preparing eight major strategy themes. Each theme was
designed to address a specific category of challenges identified during several intensive stakeholder listening sessions. Mrs.
Ranaiefar was responsible for reviewing current state and regional plans, identifying applicable strategies for each theme, and pinpointing any gaps.
California Statewide Freight Forecast Model
Enhancement (CSFFM III)
Mrs. Ranaiefar was the PM and one of the main developers of CSFFM. The objective of this project was to comprehensively improve the CSFFM for Caltrans to forecast future heavy truck traffic on the California multimodal transportation network and provide a reliable tool to assess freight and goods movement policies. Ms. Ranaiefar led the effort to design and validate the CSFFM to provide reliable tools for regional and statewide freight movement analysis to develop new legislation, strategies, or plans relating to freight transportation. She led data collection and processing and contacted MPOs, Ports and other agencies to collect data, their modeling results, future forecasts, and surveys. They performed extensive data analysis with to understand, measure and visualize differences and relationships between industries and their commodity flow and their spatial characteristics.
Southern California Strategic Freight Plan
Ms. Ranaiefar was the technical lead for this study for Caltrans that covers Districts 7, 8 and 12 (Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino and Riverside Counties) in Southern California.
The study delved deeper into local issues, projects and programs to further the implementation of the recently adopted California statewide freight plan, the California Freight Mobility Plan. A key focus of this plan, in line with the Governor’s Executive Order 20- 04, is to identify strategies for greening freight to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and air quality impacts on local communities. Fatemeh Used SCAG and Statewide Freight model to evaluate truck volumes and GHG emissions under each
scenario.
SCAG Communities Freight Impact Assessment
This project focuses on equity and disadvantaged communities (DACs) impacted by goods movement. The final product will be an open-source toolkit helping city planners and policy makers access information they need related to mitigation strategies, as well as funding resources. It also connects community based organizations to workforce development opportunities in the goods movement sector so that they can capitalize on the economic benefits freight has to offer. Fatemeh is the freight technical advisor on the project and support the team on freight data analytics and developing opportunity toolkit.
San Diego and Imperial Counties 2021 Gateway Study
Update (San Diego, CA)
Ms. Ranaiefar was the technical lead for analyzing changes in cross-border freight flows that have occurred over the past five years. The study investigated the impacts of international trade policy changes and developed future scenarios. Fatemeh used both the SANDAG and SCAG RTP models to analyze truck trips in the study area. She also led one of the case studies regarding impacts of warehousing and e-commerce in city of San Diego.
Community Impact Study (Long Beach, CA)
Fehr & Peers conducted technical analysis in support of the Port’s Community Impact Study and wrote the Traffic & Mobility chapter of the study itself. The Port Area Travel Demand Model (PortTAM) was used to identify the magnitude, location and geographic extent of Port-related truck trips in the region. Based on the results of the analysis and professional literature research, specific mitigation strategies were identified to help offset those impacts. Mrs. Ranaiefar was the modeler on this project and attended PorTAM training sessions.
San Joaquin County STAA Truck Route Study (2023)
As a PM (Prime contract), Mrs. Ranaiefar led SJCOG and all jurisdictions to review the existing STAA network, identifying gaps and deficiencies in the network and prepare recommendations to modify existing designations or propose new facilities. She developed performance measures to evaluate various
alternatives and coordinated closely with Caltrans, California Highway Patrol, Trucking associations, Industry stakeholders and community groups, and local public agencies to develop a cohesive STAA truck network.
KARGO Sustainability Study Phase I & II (2023)
The purpose of the phase I was to prepare an integrated circulation study for the cities in Kern County and evaluate the impacts of trucking activities and congestion due to fast and massive development of logistics and warehousing facilities in the study area. Fatemeh was the Associate in Charge worked closely with Kern COG and other stakeholders to understand the
concerns and priorities and develop meaningful alternatives to improve safety and efficiency of goods movement in the study area. A white paper was prepared to define strategies to reduce GHG and impacts of trucks on vulnerable communities while increase the competitiveness of the region for logistic uses and inland port. In the second phase of the study a traffic impact nexus program was developed to fund the recommended
projects.
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
Biling Liu
Engineer/Planner
EDUCATION
Master, Transportation System Engineering,
University of California Irvine
Master, Urban and Regional Planning,
University of California Irvine
Bachelor, Road and Bridge Engineering,
Hebei University of Technology, China
EXPERTISE
• Travel Behavior Forecasting
• Travel Demand Model Development
• VMT Analysis
• Emergency Evacuation Planning
• Long Range Development Planning
ABOUT
Ms. Liu has six years of experience in the transportation field. Her project and technical experience include travel demand model development and application, transit modeling, microsimulation modeling and VMT/Emission Analysis.. Ms. Liu has various project experience working with transportation planning software such as TransCAD, Citilabs Cube, Paramics, TransModeler, Synchro, and geographic information system software ArcGIS. She is also knowledgeable in statistical software including SAS, Stata, and SPSS, and scripting and programming languages including Matlab and VB, design and drafting software AutoCAD, and 3D modeling software SketchUp.
PROJECT EXPERIENCE
OCTA SR-91 TransModeler Support (Orange County, CA)
Fehr & Peers assisted OCTA to update the existing SR-91 TransModeler model to support the Year 2020 State Route 91 (SR-91) Implementation Plan, including updating the existing TransModeler to Year 2019 conditions, developing two future year scenario models with up to two sensitivity alternatives per future year scenario in the TransModeler platform, creating tools to better summarize and visualize the model results, and developing 3-D simulation. Biling was the key Modeler.
SR 91 Improvements from SR 57 to SR 55 PA/ED (Orange County, CA) This project involved the widen improvements of SR-91 from SR-57 to SR-55 focused micro simulation model in TransModeler and then used the model to forecast future traffic condition. Additional tasks performed for this project include extraction and estimation of demands and ramp metering operation setup. The results show significant improvement of westbound congestion around SR-91 and SR-57 interchange. Biling served as the key modeler in this project.
CEQA/ SB 743 Experience
Biling has completed transportation assessments projects dictated by CEQA. This included impact assessment to support negative declarations, transportation sections for EIRs, and transportation sections for EISs or joint EIR/EISs.
• City of Ontario, Airport South Cargo Center TIS
• UC Riverside, LRDP EIR (Riverside, CA)
• City of Anaheim SB 743
• City of Calabasas SB 743
• City of Garden Grove SB 743
• City of Lancaster SB 743
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
• City of Menifee SB 743
• City of Santa Clarita SB 743
• San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments (SGVCOG), SB 743 Implementation
• City of Moreno Valley, Comprehensive General Plan Update & EIR
• City of Ontario General Plan
• City of Costa Mesa, Fairview Development Center Specific Plan & EIR
• Orange County Public Works, Ladera Ranch E-Bike Program • RCTC I-10 Highland Springs
Anaheim Ball Road Hotel & Mixed-Use TIA (Anaheim,
CA)
Project Manager. Fehr & Peers conducted a transportation impact study in support of the Hotel and Mixed-Use (Project) located in the northeast corner of Anaheim Boulevard and Ball Road in the City of Anaheim, California.
City of Ontario Emergency Evacuation Assessment
(Ontario, CA)
In support of the City of Ontario's Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP), Fehr & Peers provided an emergency evacuation
assessment consistent with Assembly Bill 747 (AB 747), AB 1409, and Senate Bill 99 (SB 99). This included mapping of evacuation routes, evacuation shelters, and single evacuation route parcels.
The capacity analysis utilized the Ontario General Plan Model to develop evacuation demand for emergency scenarios, zone scenario testing and development, and concluded with
recommendations to make the City's evacuation capacity more resilient and effective. This project was completed in coordination with City of Ontario Planning, Public Works, and Emergency Operations Staff, Ontario Police Department and Ontario Fire Department.
City of Moreno Valley Comprehensive General Plan
Update & EIR (Moreno Valley, CA) OC19-0685
Lead Modeler. Fehr & Peers served on a team to update to the City of Moreno Valley General Plan. Fehr & Peers contributed to the Circulation Element and EIR. The comprehensive analysis of the existing transportation system serving Moreno Valley included the roadway system, commuter rail service, bus service, pedestrian facilities, bicycle facilities and collision statistics. The RIVTAM model was utilized to develop future forecasts consistent with the SCAG 2016 RTP. Fehr & Peers conducted a VMT impact assessment related to the build out of the land use element and circulation element roadway network consistent with SB 743. Fehr & Peers also prepared an emergency evacuation assessment consistent with AB747 and SB 99. Through a citywide visioning exercise, transportation policies to improve multimodal access and safety in the city were added to the Community Mobility Element as part of the update. As lead modeler, Biling performed existing condition analysis, and proposed general plan evaluation in supporting EIR document, circulation element evaluation, and safety analysis.
SBCTA Countywide VMT Implementation (San
Bernardino County, CA)
Fehr & Peers prepared VMT estimates for all jurisdictions in San Bernardino County to establish consistent VMT methodology and thresholds for implementation of SB 743. Biling served as the Modeling Task Leader for vehicle miles traveled (VMT) estimates and land use development projects test runs using the SCAG and SBTCA models.
SBCTA I-15 Express Lanes (SBCTA, CA)
Fehr & Peers assisted the County to develop VMT impact
threshold options and VMT screening options for land use projects based on policy goals discussed with County staff and consistent with SB 743 guidance from the State. Fehr & Peers worked on reviewing the available VMT tools, identifying current VMT methodology and estimates, screening low VMT
geographies, developing baseline VMT, identifying approximate VMT reduction measures and testing case projects. Biling served as the key modeler to test 12 case projects using San Bernardino Transportation Analysis Model (SBTAM) and analyze the VMT results comparing with the thresholds. Biling was a key Modeler.
WRCOG RIVTAM Model Update (Western Riverside
County, CA)
Fehr & Peers is teaming with WSP to develop a stand-alone travel demand model for Riverside County. In addition to Riverside County, this new regional travel demand model is designed to cover San Bernardino Valley, Orange County, and San Diego County, to forecast dynamic travel patterns between Riverside County and each of these neighboring areas.
Fehr & Peers is taking the lead on assembling all the input data required by the model for both base and future years, and is helping with model validation and future year forecasting. In addition, Fehr & Peers will develop a variety of modeling tools to facilitate model output reporting, and post process the model outputs to provide data for air quality analysis, active transportation analysis, and SB 743 related analysis, etc. Biling was a key modeler.
Coachella Airport Business Park VMT Assessment
(Coachella, CA)
Project Manager and Lead Modeler performed full SB 743
compliant VMT assessment under Base and Future year condition and estimated VMT impact, and conducted potential mitigation strategies.
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
David Sargent
Senior Principal in Charge
EXPERIENCE
Sargent Town Planning
Los Angeles, CA
Senior Principal, 2009-present
Moule & Polyzoides
Pasadena, CA
Senior Associate, 2007-2009
HDR Town Planning
Ventura & San Francisco, CA
Principal, 2005-2007
Sargent Town Planning
Ventura & Berkeley, CA
Principal, 1995-2005
Rasmussen & Associates, Architects &
Planners
Ventura, CA
Principal/Designer, 1981-1995
CERTIFICATION/AFFILIATION
Licensed Architect, California, No.15,071
Congress for the New Urbanism,
Charter Member, 1993
EDUCATION
Brown University,
Providence, Rhode Island
B.A., Geology and Theater Design, 1975
Rice University, Houston, TX
Master of Architecture, 1981
SELECTED AWARDS
2022 Citywide Plan Award, APA National,
Sustainable Communities Division:
Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood &
Conservation Plan; Rancho Cucamonga,
CA
2020 Driehaus Form-Based Code Award,
Smart Growth America and Form-Based
Codes Institute; Etiwanda Heights
Neighborhood & Conservation Plan;
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
2018 “Against All Odds” Award (SCAG);
Downtown Corridors Specific Plan; San
Fernando, CA
2017 Driehaus Form-Based Code Award,
Form-Based Codes Institute; University
Neighborhood Code; Palm Desert, CA
SELECTED AWARDS
2017 Inland Empire Section
and California State APA Award
Comprehensive Plan, Small Jurisdiction;
David Sargent has practiced architecture and urban planning and design in California for over 40 years, and in 1995 founded Sargent Town Planning in Ventura to focus his practice on pedestrian- and transit-oriented districts, corridors, neighborhoods, towns and cities. He has assembled and directed multidisciplinary teams for urban projects throughout the country, ranging in size from urban infill projects to multi-neighborhood master plans and entire cities, and ranging in scale and character from rural hamlets and small towns to major metropolitan districts and corridors.
David’s recent and current project experience includes master plans, specific plans, general plans, form-based codes and objective design and development standards, design guidelines, and implementation strategies for downtowns, urban corridors, mixed-use centers and employment districts, neighborhoods and open space conservation throughout California.
For each project, he and the team carefully analyze the plan area and context in terms of urban form, transportation, existing policies and regulations and economics, and engage stakeholders, City professional staff, and the public to identify priorities, goals, concepts and strategies to manage and implement positive, locally calibrated, market-driven change. Plans and codes are developed through an interactive, collaborative process of consultation, analysis, workshops, and charrettes, illustrated at each stage with clear, graphic presentations that enable all participants to provide well-informed input and consent to the emerging plan and intended outcomes.
Selected Project Experience
Pedley Town Center Plan (Jurupa Valley, CA 2022-2023)
As a subconsultant to Civic Solutions, STP worked with the City and community of Jurupa Valley to prepare a master plan for one of the three walkable, mixed-use town centers identified in the City’s 2017 General Plan. The general plan described quite clearly the intended land uses, activities and “traditional small-town feel” , but deferred to future Town Center Master Plans and updated zoning the responsibilty for systematically evolving the existing, fragmented suburban and rural envionments to comfortable, walkable, mixed-use traditional town centers. Through a process of stakeholder meetings, interactive working sessions with City staff, and joint City Council /Planning Commission study sessions STP crafted a range of alternative development typologies and public realm enhancments for community consideration, and prepare a Master Plan based on the community’s preferences. The City Council unanimously endorsed the Master Plan as the basis for new Town Center Zoning. The firm is currently preparing a Citywide Corridors Plan for Jurupa Valley and beginning work on a Rubidoux Town Center Master Plan.
Downtown Precise Plan and Form-Based Code (Santa Clara, CA 2018-2023) The City of Santa Clara selected a team led by WRT , with STP leading the work on urban design, conceptual architecture and design guidelines. This effort was spurred by the very active Reclaiming Our Downtown community group who had long mourned the destruction of the 10 block downtown in the 1970s as part of a “redevelopment” strategy gone awry. They, and a Downtown Community Taskforce, were very engaged during a 2-year visioning process, and convinced the City Council that a form-based code would provide a more robust tool for agressive attracting and predicatably shaping long-overdue reinvestment. STP’s scope of services was expanded to prepare such a code, and the Precise Plan and Code were adopted in 2023.
Downtown Specific Plan (Watsonville, CA, 2018-2023)
As a subconsultant to Raimi + Associates, STP led the urban design vision work and prepared the form-based objective development standards for a new Specific Plan for Watsonville’s historic downtown. Design standards address public realm and street improvements and mixed-use development at a range of types and scales. Prior to Plan adoption in 2023 the City retained STP to Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
GSARGENT TOWN PLANNING
General Plan, Palm Desert, CA; with
Raimi + Associates
2016 Award for Comprehensive Plan,
Small Jurisdiction; Central Coast Section
APA Award of Excellence, East Area One
Specific Plan, Santa Paula, CA
2015 Award for Comprehensive Plan,
Small Jurisdiction; Inland Empire Section
APA; General Plan, Coachella, CA; with
Raimi + Associates
2015 Outstanding Planning Award for
Comprehensive Planning by a Small
Jurisdiction; California Central Section
APA; Bellevue Community Plan, Merced,
CA; with Lisa Wise Consulting
2015 Award for Comprehensive Plan,
Small Jurisdiction, California Northern
Section APA; North Bayshore Precise
Plan, Mountain View, CA; with Raimi +
Associates.
2014 Pinnacle Award for Public Space,
International Downtown Association;
Lancaster Boulevard Transformation;
Project Director, Moule & Polyzoides
2009 Charter Award, Congress for the
New Urbanism; River North Master Plan,
San Antonio, TX; Project Director, Moule
& Polyzoides
2008 Driehaus Form-Based Code Award,
Form-Based Codes Institute; Midtown
Corridors Code, Ventura, CA; Principal-
in-Charge, HDR
SELECTED LECTURES & OUTREACH
Fire Safety Strategies in Urban/
Wildland Interface Contexts, 2018 AEP
Conference, Rancho Mirage, CA
Infill That Fits In, 2015 Congress of
Neighborhoods, City of Los Angeles, CA
Density in Historic Districts, National
Trust for Historic Preservation
Conference, Spokane, WA , October 2012
Green Urbanism, Congress for the New
Urbanism, Denver, CO, June 2009.
Form-Based Codes - 202, Congress for
the New Urbanism, Philadelphia, PA,
May 2007.
Smart Growth and New Urbanism in
Practice, California APA Conference,
Santa Barbara, CA, October 2003.
prepare a comprehensive update to their antiquated General Plan and zoning code. That process is well underway, with adoption anticipated in 2025.
Downtown Specific Plan (Indio, CA, 2018-2022)
As part of a team led by Raimi + Associates, STP led the urban design vision work for a comprehensive general plan update - adopted in 2019 - with a strong focus on the central Highway 111 Corridor and historic downtown. The City then retained STP to prepare a new Downtown Specific Plan and form-based code to revive and expand their moribund downtown. That Plan - adopted in 2020 - provides a clear vision and form-based code for rebuilding the historic downtown core with mixed use buildings, new housing, an expanded College of the Desert campus, new City Hall and civic center, and a range of entertainment, hospitality and office uses.
Village South Specific Plan (Claremont, CA, 2018-2021)
From a large field of proposers the City of Claremont selected a team led by STP , under a TOD planning grant from Metro, to prepare a plan for an 18-acre expansion of the historic Claremont Village to the south of the railroad tracks. The Plan was adopted unanimously by the City Council in the summer of 2021 -- after extended community discussions and debates and funding grant extensions -- and developers are preparing applications for several ambitious mixed-use projects based on the new Plan.
Downtown Corridors Specific Plan (San Fernando, CA 2012-2017) STP was selected by the City of San Fernando to update their Downtown Corridors Code Specific Plan under a grant from LA Metro, with a focus on adding new transit-oriented development near their Metrolink Station, and on preparing a new form-based development code. The two primary east-west streets of the downtown - San Fernando Road and Truman Street - are the original and “first downtown bypass” alignments of historic Route 99, and STP prepared designs for evolving them into pedestrian-oriented downtown streets. The planning process dragged on much longer than anticipated due to shifting politics, changing City staff, and small groups of concerned citizens.
After its successful completion and adoption, the Plan was recognized by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) with its “Against All Odds Award” .
Downtown and Midtown Plans & Form-Based Codes (Ventura , CA, 1993-2021) In 1992 as a long-time member of the City’s Architectural Review Board, Mr. Sargent successfully lobbied the Ventura City Council to fund a Downtown Specific Plan. He co-chaired the Commiunity Steering Comittee for that process and the plan was adopted in 1994. In 2004, Sargent Town Planning was part of a team with Crawford Multari Clark Associates (CMCA) retained to prepare a form-based development code to improve the quality of infill development within the downtown.
The firm served as Consulting Town Architect for almost a decade, during which time many infill projects were designed and sevaral built before the great recession. In 2007 Mr. Sargent led the preparation of the Midtown Corridors Form-Based Code, again in association with CMCA, extending the downtown coding techniques two miles eastward along Main Street and Thompson Boulevard, the first and second, respectively, historic Highway 101 roadways through Ventura. In 2008 that code was recognized by the Form-Based Codes Institute with their first annual Driehaus Award for excellence in form-based coding.
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
Peter VanderWal
Managing Principal | Project Director
Peter VanderWal is an urban planner and designer with nearly 20 years of professional experience in California. He is the managing principal of Sargent Town Planning, directs our design studio, and regularly manages complex urban projects and multi-disciplinary teams. Having led or contributed to dozens of pedestrian- and transit-oriented urban projects across the full spectrum of size, scale and character, Peter brings a wealth of design and creative problem solving capabilities to each project.
Peter’s current and recent experience includes vision and master plans, specific plans, general plans, form-based codes and objective design and development standards, design guidelines, and implementation strategies for downtowns, urban corridors, mixed-use employment districts, neighborhoods and open space conservation areas throughout California and beyond. He has led or contributed to the preparation of downtown and town center plans for the cities of Jurupa Valley, Norco, Indio, Palm Desert, Lancaster, Fontana, San Fernando, Oxnard, Fremont, Paso Robles, San Juan Capistrano, Soledad and numerous others.
Peter’s typical project contributions include leading the deisng and development of urban design and public realm frameworks, street network and public space design, definition of development typologies, writing and/or directing the preparation of plans and codes, and organizing and directing the work of our collaborators and sub-consultants.
Selected Project Experience
Pedley Town Center Plan (Jurupa Valley, CA 2022-2023)
As a subconsultant to Civic Solutions, STP worked with the City and community of Jurupa Valley to prepare a master plan for one of the three walkable, mixed-use Historic Town Centers identified in the City’s 2017 General Plan. Peter was the firms Project Director and lead urban designer for this assignment. Through a process of stakeholder meetings, interactive working sessions with City staff, and joint City Council /Planning Commission study sessions STP crafted a range of alternative development typologies and public realm enhancments for community consideration, and prepare a Master Plan based on the community’s preferences. The City Council unanimously endorsed the Master Plan as the basis for new Town Center Zoning. The firm is currently preparing a Citywide Corridors Plan and initiating work on a Rubidoux Town Center Master Plan for the second of the City’s three Historic Town Centers. Peter is the Project Director for those plans as well.-- Downtown Specific Plan (Indio, CA, 2018-2022)
Peter managed and directed the STP Team’s preparation of a new Downtown Specific Plan and “interim” form-based code (later incorporated into their citywide zoning) to revive and expand Indio’s declining downtown. The Plan - adopted in 2020 - provides a clear vision and form-based code for rebuilding the historic downtown core with mixed use buildings, new housing, an expanded College of the Desert campus, new City Hall and civic center, and a range of entertainment, hospitality and office uses. Following adoption of the Downtown Specific Plan, the City retained STP as part of a team to prepare a new specific plan for the Highway 111 Corridor adjacent to downtown, including form-based (objective) development standards , under SB-2 grant funding to support downtown revitalization and implement the vision of the general plan. the firm is now under contract to provide implementation support services for both specific plans.
General Plan and ODDS Update (Norco, CA, 2023-2025)
The City of Norco retained a consultant team led by STP to update it’s 30-year-old general plan.
Under Peter’s leadership, the STP Team led an expansive community engagement process to hear from residents, businesses and developers .their views of the core community values, and the
EXPERIENCE
Sargent Town Planning
Los Angeles, CA
Managing Principal, Sr Urban Designer;
2009-Present
Raimi + Associates
Los Angeles & Berkeley, CA
Contract Design Associate, 2009-2011
Moule & Polyzoides
Pasadena, CA
Designer, 2005-2009
Metroland Media Group
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
G.I.S. & Market Research Analyst, 2003
EDUCATION
Calvin University, Grand Rapids, MI
Bachelor of Arts, Interdisciplinary
Studies, 2005
University of Waterloo,
Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Urban Planning, 2001-2003
SELECTED AWARDS
2022 Citywide Plan Award, APA National,
Sustainable Community’s Division:
Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood &
Conservation Plan; Rancho Cucamonga,
CA
020 Driehaus Form-Based Code Award,
Smart Growth America and Form-Based
Codes Institute; Etiwanda Heights
Neighborhood & Conservation Plan;
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
2018 “Against All Odds” Award (SCAG);
Downtown Corridors Specific Plan; San
Fernando, CA
2017 Driehaus Form-Based Code Award,
Form-Based Codes Institute; University
Neighborhood Code; Palm Desert, CA
2017 Inland Empire Section
and California State APA Award
Comprehensive Plan, Small Jurisdiction,
General Plan, Palm Desert, CA; with
Raimi + Associates
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
ISARGENT TOWN PLANNING
opportunities and challenges facing Norco in the coming decades. The overwhelming response has been to “keep Norco Norco” , which sounds simple but requires that the General Plan and implementing zoning codes clearly describe the type of small town, semi-rural neighborhood and town center environments that the community hopes to see. Simply saying no to new development is not fiancially feasible, as the town needs significant new revenues to remain fiscally viable, and must shape new housing to meet State requirements and local preferences. To help guide current projects, the City has requested that STP assist them in updating Objective Design and Development Standards for mixed-use activity centers concurrently with the General Plan Update, which is expected to be complete in 2025.
Village South Specific Plan (Claremont, CA, 2018-2021)
From a large field of proposers the City of Claremont selected a team led by STP , under a TOD planning grant from Metro, to prepare a plan for an 18-acre Transit-Oriented Development, expanding the historic Claremont Village to the south of the railroad tracks. Plan elements include a community-based vision plan and form-based development code, and Objective Design and Development Standards to predictably implement diverse new housing types in a walkable, mixed- use, transit-oriented setting a block from the existing Metrolink commuter rail station and a new Gold Line light rail station. The Plan was adopted unanimously by the City Council in the summer of 2021 and developers are preparing applications for several mixed-use projects.
Downtown Corridors Specific Plan (San Fernando, CA 2012-2017) STP was selected by the City of San Fernando to update their Downtown Corridors Code Specific Plan under a grant from LA Metro, with a focus on adding new transit-oriented development near their Metrolink Station, and on preparing a new form-based development code. The two primary east-west streets of the downtown - San Fernando Road and Truman Street - are the original and “first downtown bypass” alignments of historic Route 99, and STP prepared designs for evolving them into pedestrian-oriented downtown streets. The original specific plan - prepared by the same firm who prepared Ventura’s original Downtown Specific Plan - was a strong start but the process dragged on much longer than anticipated due to shifting politics, changing City staff, and small groups of concerned citizens. STP After its successful completion and adoption, the Plan was recognized by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) with its “Against All Odds Award” .
Downtown Specific Plan (Watsonville, CA, 2018-2023)
As a subconsultant to Raimi + Associates, STP led the urban design vision work and prepared the form-based objective development standards for a new Specific Plan for Watsonville’s historic downtown. Design standards address public realm and street improvements and mixed-use development at a range of types and scales. Prior to Plan adoption in 2023 the City retained STP to prepare a comprehensive update to their antiquated General Plan and zoning code. That process is well underway, with adoption anticipated in 2025.
Downtown Area Plan (Fontana, CA, 2016-2017)
As a sub-consultant to Stantec as part of a general plan update, STP led public workshops to define a community vision for new “Walkable Mixed-Use” place-type designations, and prepared a Downtown Area Plan as a chapter of the new General Plan. That 4 square mile Area Plan included the historic Route 66 Corridor, the historic downtown on the Sierra Avenue corridor, and the Metrolink Station area.
2015 Outstanding Planning Award for
Comprehensive Planning by a Small
Jurisdiction, California Central Section
APA: Bellevue Corridor Plan, Merced, CA;
STP with Lisa Wise Consulting, Designer
2014 Pinnacle Award for Public Space,
International Downtown Association,
Lancaster Boulevard Streetscape
Master Plan, Lancaster, CA, Moule &
Polyzoides, Designer
2011 Award of Merit, Planning Excellence
in Implementation (APA), Lancaster
Boulevard Streetscape Master Plan,
Lancaster, CA, Moule & Polyzoides,
Designer
2016 Award for Comprehensive Plan,
Small Jurisdiction, , East Area One
Specific Plan, Santa Paula, CA
2015 Award for Comprehensive Plan,
Small Jurisdiction; Inland Empire
Section APA; General Plan, Coachella,
CA; STP with Raimi + Associates,
Designer
2015 Award for Comprehensive Plan,
Small Jurisdiction, California Northern
Section APA; North Bayshore Precise
Plan, Mountain View, CA; STP with Raimi
+ Associates, Designer
2012 Grassroots Award for Excellence in
Public Engagement, Northern California
Chapter APA; International Blvd TOD
Corridor Plan, Oakland, CA; STP with
Raimi + Associates, Designer
2009 Charter Award, Congress for the
New Urbanism;, River North Master Plan,
San Antonio, TX; Moule & Polyzoides,
Designer
2011 Outstanding Focus Issue Award
(APA); Santa Ana Renaissance Specific
Plan, Santa Ana, CA, Moule & Polyzoides,
Designer
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
MCKINLEY STREET GRADE SEPARATION, CORONA
Program manager responsible for management of the
design, right of way, and construction management
consultant firms and the contractor for a new grade
separation over the existing at-grade BNSF railroad
crossing. This $150 million project includes a steel tied arch bridge crossing the BNSF railroad through a major
commercial/industrial hub in the City of Corona. Project includes management of over 10 complex partial property acquisitions including development of right of way
requirements and acquisition documents, coordination
with utility companies/CPUC/BNSF and as necessary
mapping and exhibits to support utility relocation, general order 88, and railroad construction and maintenance
agreements, and outgrant/land transfer services.
LIMONITE GAP CLOSURE, EASTVALE
Project manager providing preliminary design, CEQA
clearance, and final design to close the gap in the existing corridor of Limonite Avenue from Hellman Avenue in the
City of Chino to Archibald Avenue. The project included over one mile of 4-lane roadway, Class I trail, wide
sidewalks, new bridge over the creek channel, bridge
aesthetics, and landscape architecture. The bridge will be a 377-foot, three-span concrete bridge. Additionally, the City will construct a new bicycle/pedestrian bridge for the Class I trail. The project also included coordination with numerous high-profile developers, regulatory permits,
development of a multi-lane roundabout, and assistance
to the City in adoption of project specific design and safety standards. Josh was responsible for identifying an
alternative design that reduced approximately 100 feet less of the bridge length saving the City nearly $5 million.
INGLEWOOD TRANSIT CONNECTOR PROJECT (ITC),
INGLEWOOD
Project manager responsible subsurface utility
investigations, right of way engineering, and real estate support services associated with a new elevated $1 billion transit facility connecting the Metro Crenshaw/LAX Line and Downtown Inglewood to the Forum, the Los Angeles
Sports and Entertainment District (which includes SoFi
Stadium) and the Inglewood Basketball and Entertainment Center. Tasks included over three miles of subsurface
utility investigations and mapping, boundary retracement and a pre-construction record of survey for a 2 square
mile area, and development of the right of way
requirements and legal descriptions/plat maps for over
100 property interests
SAN FERNANDO ROAD IMPROVEMENTS, GLENDALE
Civil lead for the City of Glendale’s PS&E project located on San Fernando Road between Elk Avenue and the
northerly limit of the City of Glendale at Spazier Avenue.
Scope of work includes rehabilitation of existing pavement and hardscape, new bicycle facilities, modifications to bus stop locations from near-side to far-side intersections, added raised medians and street beautification features south of Grandview, and included sewer repair north of
the Grandview Avenue intersection. An encroachment
permit was obtained from Caltrans D7 for work under SR
134. This project is a part of the Citywide Capital
Improvement Projects (CIP), which contains 365 miles of streets and alleys. This project included approximately two miles of complete streets improvements. The City is
investing approximately $457M in its paved roadway
network.
JOSH COSPER, PE, PLS, QSD
CIVIL LEAD
EDUCATION
BS in Civil Engineering, University of California, Irvine, 2005
REGISTRATION
CA QSD/P 00709
CA PLS 8774
CA PE C71667
Josh has 21 years of experience as a successful project manager on numerous complete streets, transportation and roadways corridor projects providing project management, planning, and final design services. His passion includes providing innovative solutions on roadway infrastructure projects that require compl ete streets and active transportation elements and threading the needle through complex right of way and utility corridors. He has also led over 50 miles of transportation corridor improvements throughout the Inland Empire and Coachella Valley over the las t 10 years.
REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
LIMONITE GAP CLOSURE, EASTVALE
Funding support and lead grant writer for a SB-1 Local
Partnership Program grant application for the project. The project constructs a new four-lane roadway alignment with Class I multi-use paths and a 330-foot bridge over
Cucamonga Creek Channel. The grant application focused
on how the project supports economic development and
housing needs by providing multimodal access for
vehicles, trucks, and active transportation travel. It also highlighted support for disadvantaged communities.
Prepared narrative write ups, exhibits, and a Cal
Benefit/Cost model for the application. Also led
coordination efforts with WRCOG and RCTC to identify a
qualifying impact fee program.
OC LOOP SEGMENT O, P, Q - COYOTE CREEK CHANNEL (A01)
(PO# DO-080-20018659; MA-080-18010601), SANTA ANA
Project manager for preparation of ATP Cycle 4 and Cycle 5 ATP grant applications for construction of the OC Loop Segment O, P, and Q of this regional trail system. The
project is a 2.7-mile Class I multi-use path adjacent to Coyote Creek flood channel. The project includes two
bridges over the channel, three roadway/highway
undercrossing, three railroad undercrossing, and three
roadway at-grade crossings.
US 101/SR 84/WOODSIDE ROAD GRANT ASSISTANCE,
REDWOOD CITY
Project manager for providing ongoing funding support
and agency coordination with Caltrans District 4 and
Headquarters. Developed grant narratives, supporting
maps, and economics analysis for grant applications.
Prepared multiple grant applications for the Project,
including a success INFRA grant for $105 million and a
regional grant application for Measure A funds from
SMCTA. Following the grant submittals, involvement
continued through development of updated project fact
sheets, engagement strategy with elected officials,
updated funding plan, and preparation of project
branding
I STREET BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, SACRAMENTO
Grant writer responsible for the preparation of an LPP., BUILD, BIP, and SACOG Regional grant applications for
the I Street Bridge Replacement Project. Responsibilities included writing and reviewing narratives, compliance with grant criteria, and coordination with the cities of
Sacramento and West Sacramento. Worked with the
economics subconsultant preparing the benefit cost
analysis report to ensure they had the necessary
information to complete their task.
ON-CALL GRANT WRITING, RIVERSIDE COUNTY
TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (RCTC)
Project manager for the preparation of grants pursuit
strategies for four large and complex infrastructure
projects, SR-91 Eastbound Corridor Operations Projects, SR-79 Realignment, and Mid County Parkway Phase 2. The
strategy for each project will identify potential grant opportunities and probability of success, grant pursuit calendar, and development of technical and political
strategies to position projects to secure funds.
Responsibilities include project management, coordination with RCTC, and leading the development of grant
strategies.
RYAN BISSEGGER
FUNDING MANAGER
EDUCATION
Training in Funding and Programming Transportation Projects in CA, UC Berkeley Technology Transfer, 2018
BA in International Business, Westminster College, 2004
Ryan has 21 years of experience in the engineering industry. He has held various roles including technical editor, proposal writer, and business development. Ryan has grown to become Mark Thomas’ funding expert. He is very knowledgeable of federal and state funding sources including the Active Transportation Program (ATP), Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP), and the new Senate Bill (SB 1) programs. He tracks the programs and is knowledgeable of call for project schedules. He has provided funding recommendations to agencies to pursue in order to implement improvements. Ryan has experience developing and reviewing grant applications. His understanding of the funding programs and experience developing proposals has been leveraged in the preparation of competitive grants.
REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
MARK TEAGUE AICP
Managing Principal, Environmental Services
EDUCATION
• B A, Political Science, California
State University, Stanislaus
CERTIFICATIONS
• Americ an Institute of Certified
Planners #019631
AFFILIATIONS
• Americ an Planning Association
Team member since 2016
In over 35 years of public- and private-sector experience, Mark has worked throughout California in agencies large and small and is considered an innovative problem solver. His projects include planned communities, shopping center EIRs, general plan and zoning code updates, impact fees, and public outreach for projects highly scrutinized by the public. Mark is often able to offer a unique approach to meeting a critical goal of a project. His experience as a planning director, staff liaison, and ability to see the whole of the project, ensures that every document meets the need of the client. He has served as on- call extension of staff for numerous cities throughout northern and southern California including Anderson, Mount Shasta, Wildomar and Eastvale.
Mark is also an excellent public speaker and regularly presents at the League of California Cities Planning Commissioner’s Academy on topics such as design guidelines, CEQA compliance, and how to read an EIR. He also teaches planning to staff with a focus on how new legal decisions affect daily activity. Because of his public outreach skills, Mark has helped with projects ranging from Walmart to water-bottling plants and conducted town hall meetings about development services department efficiencies and increases in utility fees.
With a great deal of experience in smaller communities, Mark has experience using available resources to meet the clients needs. Small agencies have the same issues to resolve as larger agencies, what they lack is resources. Using previously prepared studies, data collected for several projects and from different sources as a resource to complete tasks. By talking with the community about an issue, Mark is often able to arrive at solutions using information the agency has already paid for.
He is known for recommending solutions that are less expensive and in tune with the community.
HIGHLIGHTS OF EXPERIENCE
• Bar stow General Plan EIR and General Consulting Services | Barstow CA •
Rancho Cuc
amonga General Plan Update and EIR | Rancho Cucamonga CA •
On-Call En
vironmental Services | Banning CA
•
T
emple City General Plan Update EIR | Temple City CA
•
T
emple City Development Code Update | Temple City CA
•
North School R
econstruction EIR | Hermosa Beach CA
•
John Killen/F
ox Luggage Warehouse Project IS/MND | Industry CA
•
R
esidential Care Facility Specific Plan IS/EIR | Solana Beach CA •
Coun
ty of Riverside 5th Cycle Housing Element, Rezoning, and EIR | Riverside
CA
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
MARK TEAGUE
Managing Principal
[email protected]
• WR COG Member Jurisdiction Development Agreement Reconciliation | Riverside
CA
•
3R
oots San Diego Specific Plan and Carroll Canyon Master Plan | San Diego CA •
Fies
ta Island/Mission Bay Park Master Plan | San Diego CA
•
Laguna Hills Housing Elemen
t Update | Laguna Hills CA
•
City of P
alm Desert General Plan and EIR | Palm Desert CA
•
La Cos
ta Meadows Elementary School Reconstruction Project | San Marcos
CA
•
St
ockton Neighborhood Action Plans | Stockton CA
•
V
acaville Comprehensive Housing Analysis | Vacaville CA
•
San Ma
teo General Plan Update | San Mateo CA
•
Sacr
amento County Infill Program Update | Sacramento County CA •
Hollis
ter General Plan Update and Environmental Review | Hollister CA •
Con
tra Costa County General Plan Update | Contra Costa CA
•
Liv
ermore General Plan Update | Livermore CA
•
San
ta Rosa General Plan Update | Santa Rosa CA
•
Butt
e County General Plan Update and EIR | Butte County CA
•
Marin Coun
ty US 101 Bus on Shoulder Feasibility Study | Marin County CA •
Y
uba City General Plan Update | Yuba City CA
•
Big Basin Visioning P
roject | Statewide CA
•
Sunn
yvale Housing Development Objective Standards | Sunnyvale CA •
R
ohnert Park Housing Services | Rohnert Park CA
•
Richmond Mills Act Or
dinance Update | Richmond CA
•
Riv
er Crossing Market Place Specific Plan EIR | Redding CA •
Addendum t
o Northeast Quadrant Specific Plan EIR | Dixon CA
•
V
alley Transportation Authority Transit Oriented Development Visioning | Gilroy CA
•
T
uolumne County Title 17 Zoning Code Comprehensive Update and ADU Ordinance | Tuolumne County CA
•
Imperial Coun
ty Housing Element Update | Imperial County CA
•
Mar
ysville Housing Element Update | Marysville CA
•
Y
ountville Housing Element Update | Yountville CA
Staff Services
• On-Call St aff Services, Wildomar CA
•
On-Call St
aff Services, Beaumont CA
•
On-Call En
vironmental Staff Services, Eastvale CA
•
W
estern Riverside Council of Governments Planning Support Services | Riverside CA
•
Coun
ty of Riverside Transportation and Land Management Agency On-Call Planning Services, Riverside CA
ACTIVITIES
Teaching
• UC San Dieg o Instructor Online CEQA Training Courses | San Diego CA •
Imperial Coun
ty CEQA Training, July/August 2016
APA 2017-Present
• Sacr amento Valley APA PLAN Program 2018-2019
•
Calif
ornia APA Conference 2017-2020
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
NICOLE VERMILION
Principal, Air Quality/Energy/GHG/Noise Services
Nicole oversees project staffing and timing for the air quality, greenhouse gas (GHG), and noise technical team’s impact evaluations under CEQA. She is responsible for expanding and fine-tuning the team based on changes in technology, legislation, and client needs and for ensuring that PlaceWorks air quality and GHG studies are defensible and consistent with recent case law. She closely follows the rapid changes in requirements and the latest information on CEQA thresholds and analysis methodology. She has performed numerous GHG emissions inventories for individual projects as well as citywide emissions inventories for general plans.
Nicole frequently presents at conferences, including the California Chapters of both APA and AEP . She is a beta tester for the CalEEMod program. As a member of AEP’s Climate Change Committee, Nicole has contributed to white papers addressing GHG emissions inventories for climate action plans and general plans, post-2020 GHG thresholds, and Friant Ranch.
HIGHLIGHTS OF EXPERIENCE
Air Quality, GHG, and Energy Analyses
• Retail Centers and Mixed-Use Developments: Br ea Mall Mixed-Use Project EIR (for this project, Nicole also managed the entire CEQA project in addition to leading technical analyses, Brea Plaza, Broadway Mixed-Use project in Redwood City; Serramonte Shopping Center Expansion in Daly City; Fresno El Paseo Marketplace in Fresno; Platinum Triangle Marketplace in Highland; San Leandro Shoreline Development; Butcher’s Corner in Sunnyvale •
Down
town/Town Center and Civic Center Projects: Norwalk Entertainment District-Civic Center Specific Plan EIR; Laguna Niguel Town Center; Men’s Central Jail (Treatment Center) for LA County; Orange County Civic Center; Downtown Hayward Specific Plan; Atherton Civic Center; Walnut Creek Downtown Specific Plan; Del Avenue Specific Plan
•
Hotel Pr
ojects: Hyatt Regency Newport Beach; Courtyard Marriott Glendale; DeAnza and Village Hotels in Cupertino; Hilton Garden Inns in Walnut Creek and San Jose; Anabella Hotel Anaheim
•
Corridor, T
OD, Station Area Specific Plan EIRs: Valley Corridor, San Bernardino County; Connect Southwest LA TOD and West Carson TOD, Los Angeles County; Beach Boulevard, Anaheim; Midtown, Long Beach; Millbrae Station, Millbrae
•
Senior Living and Medical F
acility Projects: Newport Beach Vivante Senior
Living; Torrance Memorial New Main Tower Project; Del Amo Senior Village; Kaiser Medical Centers in Irvine and Anaheim; City of Hope Cancer Research Center Expansion in the cities of Duarte & Irwindale; The Springs at Bethsaida Senior Living in Tustin
EDUCATION
• Master of Urban & Regional
Planning
, University of California,
Irvine
• BS with Honors, E
cology &
Evolutionary Biology, University of
California, Santa Cruz
•
BA with Honor
s, Environmental
Studies, University of California,
Santa Cruz
AFFILIATIONS
• American Planning Association
(AP
A)
• Association of En
vironmental
Professionals (AEP)
ACTIVITIES
• Climate Change Committee |
Calif
ornia AEP
2023 Certificate of Appreciation
• CalEEMod Bet
a-Tester
Team member since 2004
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
NICOLE VERMILION
Principal
[email protected]
• Industrial Projects: Proposed Rule 2305 Indirect Source Review – W
arehouses Environmental Assessment for SCAQMD; Prologis Warehouse EIR in Los Angeles; CenterPoint Properties Warehouse at Greenleaf Avenue in Santa Fe Springs; Ontario Ranch Specific Plan EIR; Agua Mansa Logistics Center Addendum and Colton Southwest Regional Operations Center IS/ MND in Colton; 12+ warehouse/industrial projects in the City of Industry; 2000 Marina Boulevard Tech Studies - AQ/GHG in San Leandro; Cordes Ranch Annexation Specific Plan in Tracy; Dixon Northeast Quadrant Specific Plan Addendum in Dixon; CenterPoint Properties Warehouse in Richmond •
General Plan EIRs: Coun
ties of Contra Costa, Los Angeles, and San
Bernardino and Cities of:
» Bars
tow
» Clovis
» Corona
» Cupertino
» El Mont
e
» Highland
» Industr
y
» La Habra
» Los Alamitos
» Menlo Park
» Moorpark
» Morg
an Hill
» New
ark
» Newport Beach
» Ont
ario
» Palm Springs
» Palo Alt
o
» Pasadena
» Rancho Mirag
e
» Redondo Beach
» San Clement
e
» San Leandro
» San Raf
ael
» Sant
a Ana
» Sierra Madr
e
» Stock
ton
» Temple City
» Torr
ance
» Tular
e
» Vac
aville
» Vallejo
» Wes
tminster
» Yuc
aipa
CEQA Projects Managed by Nicole Vermilion
• The Ontario Plan 2050 General Plan (and previous update) | Ontario CA • Ont
ario Regional Sports Complex EIR | Ontario CA
• Ont
ario Ranch Specific Plan EIR | Ontario CA
• Yucc
a Valley On-Call Environmental Services | Yucca Valley CA • Colton Sa
fety Element IS/MND | Colton CA
• Agua Mansa Logistics Cen
ter Addendum | Colton CA
• Specific Plan EIRs: Brea, Cal St
ate Fullerton/City of Fullerton, Hemet, Yucaipa
• General Plan EIRs: Cor
ona, Los Alamitos, Ontario, Yucca Valley, Yucaipa
• City of Irvine CE
QA Manual | Irvine CA
• Brea Mall Mix
ed-Use Project EIR | Brea CA
• Residen
tial Project EIRs: Anaheim, Brea, Claremont, Mission Viejo • Irvine Business Comple
x EIR and GHG Inventory | Irvine CA
Additional Projects
• City of Industr y Climate Action Plan | City of Industry CA • TIGER II Gran
t for the San Bernardino International Airport | Highland CA • Ant
elope Valley Area Plan EIR | County of Los Angeles CA
• Concor
d Hills Regional Park EIR | East Bay Regional Parks District CA • 1700 Dell Av
enue Office EIR | Campbell CA
• Measure E Bond P
rogram CEQA and Site Assessment Services | Fremont
SPEAKING ENGAGEMENTS
• “Climate Change and Air Quality Workshop – Proposed Cumulative Air Toxics Thr
esholds” | 2022 AEP CA State Conference | Yosemite CA
• “A Div
ersity of Air Quality Thresholds for a Diverse State: Thresholds Concepts to Reflect Differences in Existing Pollution Burdens” | 2021 AEP CA State Conference | Long Beach CA (Virtual) “All About the Offsets – Mitigating GHG Impacts with GHG Credits” | AEP February 2020 | Irvine CA •
“CEQA GHG Emissions Thr
esholds: The Past, Present and Future – Bracing
for Climate Change: Strategies for Mitigation and Resiliency” | Air and Waste Management Association December 2019 | Santa Barbara CA Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
JOANN C. HADFIELD
Principal, Environmental Services
JoAnn has 35 years of experience focusing on CEQA and NEPA compliance services. She has been responsible for document preparation and processing for hundreds of projects, including rail and highway improvement projects, water/wastewater projects, big-box commercial developments, downtown redevelopment projects, a waste- by-rail “mega” landfill, a heap-leach gold mine, sensitive coastal and hillside development projects, and large-scale mixed-use communities.
JoAnn is well versed in the entire environmental process and has a solid working knowledge of and ongoing relationships with a myriad of federal, state, regional, and local agencies. She frequently performs third-party peer review for a wide variety of clients and projects.
JoAnn’s experience also encompasses policy planning; site-specific, community, and regional land use planning; and entitlement and regulatory permit processing. Her public sector work has included the preparation of housing plans, transportation and air quality studies, and Local Coastal Plans, while her private sector experience has included specific plan preparation and general plan amendments, zone changes, conditional use permit entitlement processing, and coastal development permits. JoAnn’s experience includes coordination and processing of regulatory permits, including US Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 Permits, California Department of Fish and Game Streambed Alteration Permits, RWQCB Section 401 Water Quality Certifications, and National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permits.
HIGHLIGHTS OF EXPERIENCE
• Santa Ana Circulation Element Update EIR | Santa Ana CA • Santa Ana General Plan Update EIR and Various On-Call Services Contracts and Projects | Santa Ana CA
• Santa Ana Housing Element Update EIR | Santa Ana CA
• More than a dozen CEQA projects for City of Newport Beach, including » Newport Crossings Specific Plan EIR
» Newport Beach Land Use Element EIR
» Uptown Newport EIR and Uptown EIR Addendum
» Hyatt Regency Expansion EIR
» Museum House EIR Addendum
• Irvine CEQA Manual | Irvine CA
• Laguna Niguel Town Center EIR | Laguna Niguel CA
• Environmental/Regulatory Permitting for Public Works projects and County staff training in CEQA/NEPA/Regulatory Permitting | Orange County CA • On-Call CEQA Services Multi-Year Contract | Laguna Hills CA • CEQA Documentation (3 IS/MNDs) for Fuel Modification Plans | Laguna Beach CA
EDUCATION
• BS, Urban Planning, University of
Utah
• Civil Engineering, San Diego
State University, San Diego (all
engineering coursework for BS
degree completed)
CERTIFICATIONS
• Engineer-in-Training (EIT)
AFFILIATIONS
• ULI Orange County/Inland Empire,
Leader of SB 743 Strike Team
• ULI OC/IE former Vice Chair of
Infrastructure Council
• Association of Environmental
Professionals (AEP), former Vice
President of Programs
AWARDS
• Santa Ana General Plan Update |
2024 Award of Excellence, APACA-
OC; 2024 Award of Merit, APACA
• Etiwanda/Country Village Road
Truck Restriction Ordinance
EIR | 2020 Merit Award for
Environmental Analysis Document,
AEP California
Team member since 2004
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
JOANN C. HADFIELD
Principal
[email protected]
• EIR for the San Bernardino Countywide Plan | San Bernardino County CA • Greenspot Village and Marketplace EIR | Highland CA
• Agua Mansa Commerce Park Specific Plan EIR | Jurupa Valley CA • Etiwanda Avenue/Country Village Road Truck Restriction Ordinance EIR and Environmental Justice | Jurupa Valley CA
• Clovis General Plan Update EIR | Clovis CA
• Highland General Plan Update EIR | Highland CA
• El Monte General Plan Update EIR | El Monte CA
• Industry Housing Element EIR | Industry CA
• Fresno El Paseo EIR | Fresno CA
PRIOR EXPERIENCE
• Amtrak, Los Angeles Union Station Run-Through Tracks EIS/EIR | Los Angeles CA • Canyon Park Specific Plan | Los Angeles County CA
• North Lake Specific Plan | Los Angeles County CA
• Rancho Malibu Project | Los Angeles County CA
• Cimarron Valley Estates EIR | Riverside County CA
• Saddle Creek/Saddle Crest Final EIR & Mitigation Monitoring Plan | Trabuco Canyon CA
• OCSD Supplemental Full Secondary Treatment CEQA Documentation for Collection System Improvements | Orange County CA
• East Lake Specific Plan Supplemental EIR | Lake Elsinore CA • Mountain View Avenue Bridge Widening | Loma Linda CA
• North Main Street District Specific Plan, Environmental Compliance | Corona CA • Crest View/Wal-Mart General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, and CUP Project EIR | Huntington Beach CA
• Barbadanes Park Master Plan | Mission Viejo CA
• El Sobrante Landfill Project EIR | Riverside County CA • Chula Vista Urban Core Specific Plan EIR Third-Party Review | Chula Vista CA • Bolo Station/RailCycle Landfill Project | San Bernardino County CA • Port of Long Beach Liquified Natural Gas Import and Distribution Terminal Third-Party Review | Long Beach USD
• Crown Valley Elementary Ball Field Lighting Project | Laguna Niguel CA
SPEAKING ENGAGEMENTS
• “Examining Potential Consequences and Solutions: Diverse Perspectives on SB 743” | 2015 AEP CA State Conference, Santa Barbara CA • CEQA Advanced Workshop | AEP Orange County, CA, 2011–2015 • “Against All Odds: Infill Land Use Compatibility for the Uptown Newport Mixed-Use Project” | 2014 AEP CA State Conference, Huntington Beach CA • CEQA Basics Workshop | AEP Orange County, CA, 2008, 2009, 2013 • CEQA Basics Guest Lecture | CSU Fullerton, UC Irvine, Chapman University • Individualized CEQA Training | Shopoff Group, OC Public Works, Building Industry Association, Urban Land Institute
• “Urban Decay Analysis: Are You Serious?” | 2010 AEP CA State Conference, Palm Springs CA
• “Defensible, Not Gold Plated: Preparing Cost-Effective, Comprehensive and Meaningful EIRs” | 2009 AEP CA State Conference, San Francisco CA Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
8. Fee Proposal - Cover Letter
May 5, 2025
Paul Toor, P .E., Director of Public Works
City of Jurupa Valley
Public Works Department 8930
Limonite Avenue
Jurupa Valley, CA 92509
Dear Paul Toor and Members of the Selection Committee:
The Fehr & Peers Team, consisting of staff from Fehr & Peers, Sargent Town Planning, Mark Thomas, and PlaceWorks is pleased to submit the following cost proposal to perform the duties required for the Citywide Freight Analysis Plan and Mobility Element Update.
Fehr & Peers proposes a not-to-exceed fee of $340,160. A detailed matrix providing a breakdown of proposed costs for each task item is included on the following page.
We appreciate the opportunity to propose on this important project and look forward to the City’s response.
Subject: RFP for Professional Services for Citywide Freight Analysis Plan and Mobility Element Update Sarah Brandenberg, PE
Principal and Authorized Representative
[email protected]
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
8. Fee Proposal
Task 1 Task 2 Task 3 Task 4 Task 5 Task 6 Task 7 Task 8 Total Classification
Direct
Hourly Rate Hours Cost Hours Cost Hours Cost Hours Cost Hours Cost Hours Cost Hours Cost Hours Cost Hours Cost Principal $360.00 8 $2,880 6 $2,160 6 $2,160 6 $2,160 6 $2,160 6 $2,160 4 $1,440 12 $4,320 54 $19,440 Senior Associate II $300.00 12 $3,600 16 $4,800 16 $4,800 32 $9,600 32 $9,600 24 $7, 2 0 0 8 $2,400 12 $3,600 152 $45,600 Associate $235.00 16 $3,760 4 $940.00 16 $3,760 8 $1,880 44 $10,340 Senior Engineer/ Planner $215.00 24 $5,160 32 $6,880 18 $3,870 40 $8,600 60 $12,900 24 $5,160 8 $1,720 206 $44,290 Engineer/Planner III $185.00 8 $1,480 80 $14,800 88 $16,280 Engineer/Planner II $175.00 16 $2,800 20 $3,500 24 $4,200 60 $10,500 Engineer/ Planner $160.00 24 $3,840 16 $2,560 40 $6,400 Project Coordinator $160.00 40 $6,400 40 $6,400
Intern $155.00 16 $2,480 16 $2,480 16 $2,480 16 $2,480 16 $2,480 80 $12,400 Subtotal 84 $18,040 134 $28,200 76 $16,810 122 $2 7, 9 8 0 146 $33,460 158 $33,680 20 $5,560 24 $7 ,920 764 $171,650 Subcontracts
PlaceWorks 156 $55,500 18 $4,830 174 $60,330
Sargent Town Planning 22 $4,600 30 $5,830 124 $23,720 66 $13,100 242 $ 47, 2 5 0 Mark Thomas 158 $23,440 112 $17, 2 8 0 52 $15,460 322 $56,180 Subtotal 22 $4,600 188 $29,270 124 $23,720 112 $17, 2 8 0 52 $15,460 66 $13,100 156 $55,500 18 $4,830 738 $163,760 Direct Costs
Mark Thomas - EMI Pavement Assessment/Field Work $1,200 Sargent Town Planning - Travel/Reproduction $3,000 $3,000 PlaceWorks - Travel/Reproduction $300.00 $250.00 $550
Subtotal $4,200 $300.00 $250.00 $4,750
GRAND TOTAL PROJECT 106 $22,640 322 $57,470 200 $44 730 234 $45,260 198 $48,920 224 $46,780 176 $61,360 42 $13,000 1,502 $340,160 $1,200
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
Page | 1
120
STAFF REPORT
DATE: JUNE 5, 2025
TO: HONO
RABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FRO
M: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
PAUL TOOR, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEER
SUBJE
CT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 12.O
FOURT
H AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF
JURUPA VALLEY AND VAN DYKE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS , INC.
FOR ON-CALL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES
RECOM
MENDATION
1) That t
he City Council approve the Fourth Amendment to the Agreement between the City of Jurupa Valley and Van Dyke Landscape Architects , Inc. for On-Call Landscape Architectural Services and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement in substantially the form and format attached and as approved by the City Attorney.
BACKGROUND
Landsc
ape architectural services are necessary to planning and land development related activities. As directed by the City Council, the City has actively been recruiting in-house staff to provide support services related to planning and land development.
While the Public Works Department (“Department”) has been successful in recruiting these positions, the City still requires assistance from outside firms to manage the workload and offer consulting services in specialized areas, including landscape architectural services.
At t
he July 21, 2022, City Council meeting, the Council approved an agreement with Van Dyke Landscape Architects, Inc. (“VDLA”) to provide landscape design, landscape inspection, and plan checking services. The original agreement called for a not to exceed amount of $75,000 per fiscal year. The initial term of the agreement ends July 31, 2025, but may be extended for two, one-year extensions by mutual agreement.
On Apr
il 20, 2023, the City Council approved the First Amendment to the Agreement between the City and VDLA. This amendment increased the amount not to exceed $150,000 per fiscal year.
RETURN TO AGENDA
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
Page | 2
Due to considerable ongoing development, the City has utilized VDLA for additional services at a rate far quicker than anticipated. As a result, a Second Amendment was approved by the City Council on February 1, 2024, increasing the contract limit to $250,000 per fiscal year. The original agreement allowed for two, one- year extensions upon the completion of the initial three-year term, which ends on July 31, 2025, if the City and VDLA choose to do so.
On September 5, 2024, the City Council approved the Third Amendment to the Agreement between the City and VDLA. This amendment incorporated an increase to VDLA’s hourly rates and a clause for future annual adjustments. The Amendment identified that VDLA may request a rate adjustment every July 1 st for the remainder of the
Agreement. The adjustment must be based on Consumer Price Index (“CPI”) and shall not exceed 5%.
ANALYSIS
VDLA has largely been assisting City staff with plan checking and landscape inspection services. A detailed inspection for all the landscape improvements is conducted before the City accepts the improvements for maintenance. The City has accepted seven new developments for landscape maintenance over the past fiscal year and anticipates accepting four additional developments in the next twelve months. To date, the majority of the services received under this Agreement have all been reimbursed through land development projects.
Due to the considerable amount of land development occurring in the City, it is recommended to extend the agreement with VDLA for a one-year extension and increase the existing contract along with amendments for an additional year through July 31, 2026.
In addition, the billing hourly rates for VDLA will be increased by 2.9%, which is consistent with the CPI for the Riverside -San Bernardino- Ontario area for 2024 January to December period.
As previously stated, the majority of services are reimbursable through land development projects. Funding for the Amendment is identified in the proposed Fiscal Year 202 5-26 budget.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The majority of services provided will continue to be reimbursed by new development projects and capital improvement projects . There will be minimal impact to the City’s General Fund.
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
Page | 3
ALTERNATIVES
1. Do not approve the Fourth Amendment between the City and VDLA
2. Provide alternative direction to staff.
************************** SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE **************************
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
c:::
Prepared by:
Steve Loriso
Deputy Director of Public Works
Reviewed by:
Su�
Finance Director
Approved as to form:
Peter M. Thorson
City Attorney
Reviewed by:
r
of Public Works/City Engineer
Reviewed by:
Michael Flad
Assistant City Manager
�£:.-&A
Rod B. Butler
City Manager
Attachments:
1. Fourth Amendment to the Agreement between the City of Jurupa Valley and Van Dyke Landscape Architects, Inc.
2. Hourly Rate Schedule from Van Dyke Landscape Architects, Inc. _ www.jurupavalley.org - -
Page I 4
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
1 FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT
SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY AND VAN
DYKE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS, INC. FOR ON-CALL LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES
This Fourth Amendment is made and effective as of June 5, 2025, between the City of Jurupa Valley, a municipal corporation (“City”) and Van Dyke Landscape Architects, Inc. (“Consultant”). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. This Fourth Amendment is made with the respect to the following facts and purposes:
A. On July 21, 2022, the City and Consultant entered into that certain Agreement entitled “AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY AND VAN DYKE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS, INC.
FOR ON-CALL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES.”
B. On April 20, 2023, the City and Consultant entered into that certain First Amendment entitled “FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT FOR
CONSULTANT SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY AND VAN DYKE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS, INC. FOR ON-CALL LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECTUAL SERVICES.”
C. On February 1, 2024, the City and Consultant entered into that certain Second Amendment entitled “SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT FOR
CONSULTANT SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY AND VAN DYKE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS, INC. FOR ON-CALL LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES.”
D. On September 5, 2024, the City and Consultant entered into that certain Third Amendment entitled “THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT FOR
CONSULTANT SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY AND VAN DYKE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS, INC. FOR ON-CALL LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES.”
2. Modification to term of Agreement. The term of the Agreement set forth in Section 1 of the Agreement shall be extended from the date when the Agreement expires on July 31, 2025 to July 31, 2026, unless otherwise expressly extended and agreed to by both parties in writing, or terminated by either party as provided in the Agreement. The City may elect to terminate the Agreement at any time. Section 1 of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
2 3. Exhibit B, Quotation for Service, is hereby amended as follows:
Title Prior Hourly Rate New Hourly Rate
Principal $129.00 $132.00
Associate $129.00 $132.00
On-Call Plan Checker –
Project Manager
$129.00 $132.00
On-Call Plan Checker $129.00 $132.00
On-Call Landscape Field
Inspection – Project Manager
$129.00 $132.00
On-Call Landscape Field
Inspection
$129.00 $132.00
Project Manager $129.00 $132.00
4. The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Contractor warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Contractor and has the authority to bind Contractor to the performance of its obligations hereunder.
5. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
-3-
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be signed and executed personally or on its behalf by its duly authorized representative.
VAN DYKE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS, INC.
By: _______________________________
Name: Yale Hooper
Title: President
By:________________________________
Name:
Title:
[SIGNATURES OF TWO CORPORATE OFFICERS OR CORPORATE AUTHORITY RESOLUTION REQUIRED]
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
A California Municipal Corporation
_______________________________
Rod B. Butler
City Manager
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Evelyne Ssenkoloto
Interim City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________
Peter M. Thorson
City Attorney
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
Landscape Architecture
Planning
Water Management
Graphic Communications
462 Stevens Avenue, Suite 107, Solana Beach, CA 92075-2042 Tel: 619.294.8484 • Fax: 619.574.0626 • Web: www.vdla.us Principals: Yale Hooper, CID, CLIA, RWSS • Denise Armijo, ASLA • Brett Allen, ASLA, CA LLA #6595, CID, CLIA, RWSS • Mitch Phillippe, ASLA, CA LLA #3781 Landscape Architectural, Plan Checking, & Inspection Services Principal $ 132
Project Manager $ 132
CA Licensed Landscape Architect $ 132
Certified Irrigation Designer/Auditor $ 132
Landscape Inspector $ 132
Landsc
ape Plan Checker $ 132
Technical/Professional Staff $ 117
Clerical $ 79
May 21st,
To: City of Jurupa Valley
Re: Extension of VDLA On-Call Contract
Hello,
On July 21st, 2022, Van Dyke Landscape Architects (VDLA) entered into an On-Call Agreement with the City of Jurupa Valley. This contract is set to expire on July 31st, 2025. VDLA is requesting to exercise the option expressed in Section 1 of our contract to extend our agreement an additional year, thus making the expiration July 31st, 2026. We believe the City would benefit greatly from continuity of keeping VDLA on call.
In addition, VDLA is requesting a formal rate increase from $129.00 an hour for all services to $132.00 an hour, as described below.
This rate increase is in line with the 2.9% CPI year- over-year increase for 01/2024-01/2025 in Riverside County. This number was taken from the U.S Bureau of Labor and Statistics.
Working with the City has been a great pleasure, and we hope that we can continue to work together.
Thank you for your time and consideration-
Yale Hooper
President
Van Dyke Landscape Architects (VDLA)
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
Page | 1
120
STAFF REPORT
DATE: JUNE 05, 2025
TO: HO
NORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FR
OM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
PAUL TOOR, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEER
SUBJ
ECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 12.P
APPROVAL TO PURCHASE TWO (2) F -150 VEHICLES FOR THE
MOBILE FOOD VENDING PROGRAM
RECO
MMENDATION
1) It is recommended that the City Council approve the purchase of two (2) Ford F- 150 vehicles to support the Mobile Food Vending Program for $ 88,752.22, including taxes and fees.
2) That
the City Council authorizes the Finance Director to make any necessary budget adjustments.
BACKGRO
UND
On M
arch 20, 2025, City Council approved the purchase of 2 pick-up trucks to be utilized by two (2) Full Time Code Enforcement Officers for the Food Truck and Street Vending Program in Fiscal Year 2024-2025.
Upon
acquisition, the trucks will be incorporated into the City’s fleet, which currently consists of forty-seven (47) vehicles. This total includes nine (9) vehicles assigned to the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department. The remaining thirty-eight (38) vehicles consist of a combination of passenger vehicles used by administrative staff, Code Enforcement, and Building and Public Works Inspectors, as well as light -duty trucks operated by Public Works Maintenance staff.
ANALY
SIS
As
the City continues to grow, additional vehicles are necessary to support operational efficiency and ensure uninterrupted service delivery. Purchasing the two (2) vehicles will help maintain productivity and prevent disruptions in daily tasks. In particular, the Code Enforcement department, who will utilize the vehicles for the Food Truck and Street
RETURN TO AGENDA
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
Page | 2
Vendor Enforcement Program by conducting field inspections and site visits. Purchasing the vehicles will support the Division’s ability to meet service demands effectively.
City
staff solicited proposals from three (3) local dealerships listed as follows:
Dealership Location Price Quantity Total
Sunrise Ford Fontana, CA $44,376.11 2 $88,752.22
Citrus Ford Ontario, CA $44,842.99 2 $89,685.98
Fritts Ford Riverside, CA $45,995.97 2 $91,991.94
As
part of the City’s Mobile Food Vending Program, staff will be implementing enforcement measures to ensure vendor compliance with permit requirements and operational regulations. In some cases, enforcement efforts may require the temporary confiscation of unpermitted equipment, which must be safely transported to a designated City facility. To support these daily operations, staff recommends the acquisition of Ford vehicles, which align with the City’s existing fleet and are known for their reliability, cost - effective maintenance, and suitability for field use. This investment will enhance the City’s capacity to effectively enforce the program and maintain public safety and regulatory compliance throughout the community.
The pr
oposal from Sunrise Ford is fair and reasonable. Therefore, staff is recommending the purchase of two (2) 2025 F -150 pickup trucks from Sunrise Ford in Fontana, CA.
Sunrise Ford is a reputable dealership in the local market from which the City has purchased multiple vehicles, including the latest vehicle purchase in March, 2025.
FI
NANCIAL IMPACT
The t
otal cost of the two (2) 2025 Ford F -150s including tax is $88,752.22 . The funding for the purchase is available in Internal Service Fund (ISF) Equipment and Vehicles account number 730.7300.62720.
ALT
ERNATIVES
1. Not
approve the vehicle purchase
2. Provide alternative direction
************************** SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE ************************** Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
Prepared by:
Deputy Director of Public Works
Reviewed by:
s�_a_s
__ _
Finance Director
Approved as to form:
Peter M. Thorson
City Attorney
Attachments:
1. Sunrise Ford Quotes
2. Vehf cle Specifications
_ \V\vwjurupavalley.org -- -
Reviewed by:
oor
arks Director/City Engineer
Reviewed by:
Michael Flad
Assistant City Manager
��
Rod B. Butler
City Manager
Page I 3
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
Fuel Economy and Environment
Smart
phone
QR Code™
fueleconomy .gov
Calculate personalized estimates and compare vehicles
Annual fuel cost
Fuel Economy & Greenhouse Gas Rating (tailpipe only)Smog Rating (tailpipe only) Yo u
over 5 years
compared to the
average new vehicle.
21 19 25
4.8 Standard Pickup Trucks range from 12 to
84 MPG. The best vehicle rates 140
MPGe.
$3,000
$2,500
2 B^^^BjCd
MvG<B^^^B
6*"?+/RM!V7rcdR2'
*6
%R\
MV#eT$7*A/9LXq8R(>FPyA
@!///!@w
t3khP
)oe
*~hOrG
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
This vehicle emits
425 grams CO per mile. The best emits 0 grams per mile (tailpipe only). Producing and distributing fuel also create emissions; learn more at fueleconomy.gov.
Actual results will vary for many reasons, including driving conditions and how you drive and maintain your vehicle. The average new vehicle gets 28 MPG and costs $9,500 to fuel over 5 years. Cost estimates are based on 15,000 miles per year at $3.50 per gallon. MPGe is miles per gasoline gallon equivalent. Vehicle emissions are a significant cause of climate change and smog.
Fuel Economy
combined city/hwy
MPG
city highway
gallons per 100 miles
spend
more in fuel costs
ĀÂÞÞÞÂĀΩ¶»Ä¤äýÐĀÂÞÞÞÂĀ
¨§»«¦ Ñå¦îïáêÊÅùª©
£¢Úý¨ÖÍĀìªä³ÏûöÉÿ±ù
ò
¬ó³ÃÓìÙæºÍ¾ÃÉîÙÁÕÍè»õ
ĀËÙУËò
ý
õõõ
ý¥µýõíÕ©É©¡¥ÅýÅáéñÙ±å
SCAN OR TEXT TO
1FSKD02090 48028
Msg & Data
rates may
apply.
Text HELP
for help
www.ford.com/help/privacy-terms/
1FTEX1KP0SKD02090
ĬēĂĐĞďĢĂĕĚāĝĕĎāăāĊāĬ
KAN-006125 CA 9-NORMAL,NB,206125,RM022 8410 220241210
BLEND 0797
ULC U W CA C
CERT CERT CERT TRD RAMP BUMP CAMP BOOK EXFL ROTA
1FTEX1KP0 SKD02090 NB GU13
VEHICLE DESCRIPTION
F-150
SK D02090
2025 F-150 4X2 SUPER CAB EXTERIOR
145" WHEELBASE OXFORD WHITE
2.7L V6 ECOBOOST INTERIOR
ELEC TEN-SPEED AUTO TRANS DARK SLATE VINYL 40/20/40 2202412100797
ƬōƐūƔŞƥŒƣĭƃőƧŊƚţƪœŸœŸĵűŨŮŗƬŕĿžŮĭŨʼnŮŁŏŭŖƟƖĴŤŇƘķŴƕŦƌĺƂƬĸţŕšƞŽƓŰŌƃŊƣşƍŠŃĴųƈũĹƏƤƤŗƩőűƁřŹơʼnıƑőƩơűőƩřƉƩƁűơʼnŹƁƁ 027129
2235/2800
TOTAL MSRPSunrise Ford
P.O. BOX 310125
Fontana CA 92335
71B 152
CD27
SOLD TO RAMP ONE
SHIP TO (IF OTHER THAN SOLD TO) RAMP TWO
SHIP THROUGH
$44,850.00
FINAL ASSEMBLY PLANT
KANSAS CITY
METHOD OF TRANSP.
CONVOY
ITEM #:
71-F155 O/T 2
RM022 N RB 2X 535 006125 12 02 24
INCLUDED ON THIS VEHICLE
EQUIPMENT GROUP 103A 1,195.00
XL SERIES
LED FOG LAMPS
17" SILVER PAINTED ALUMINUM
CHROME FRONT/REAR BUMPERS
PRIVACY GLASS W/REAR DEFROSTE
OPTIONAL EQUIPMENT/OTHER
.245/70R 17 BSW ALL-SEASON
3.55 RATIO REGULAR AXLE NO CHARGE
6365# GVWR PACKAGE
FRONT LICENSE PLATE BRACKET NO CHARGE
50 STATE EMISSIONS NO CHARGE
EXTENDED RANGE 36GAL FUEL TANK
VINYL 40/20/40 FRONT SEAT NO CHARGE
PRICE INFORMATION
BASE PRICE $41,660.00
TOTAL OPTIONS/OTHER 1,195.00
____________
TOTAL VEHICLE & OPTIONS/OTHER 42,855.00
DESTINATION & DELIVERY 1,995.00
(MSRP)
(MSRP)
STANDARD EQUIPMENT INCLUDED AT NO EXTRA CHARGE
EXTERIOR
DAYTIME RUNNING LAMPS
EASY FUEL® CAPLESS FILLER
FULLY BOXED STEEL FRAME
HEADLAMPS - AUTO HIGH BEAM
HEADLAMPS - AUTOLAMP
(ON/OFF)
LED REFLECTOR HEADLAMPS
LOCKING REMOVABLE TAILGATE
MANUAL FOLD POWER MIRRORS
PICKUP BOX TIE DOWN HOOKS
POWER TAILGATE LOCK
TRAILER SWAY CONTROL
WIPERS- INTERMITTENT
INTERIOR
CRUISE CONTROL
DOOR LOCKS - POWER
DUAL SUNVISORS
ILLUMINATED ENTRY
MESSAGE CTR: OUTSIDE TEMP,
COMPASS, TRIP COMPUTER
TILT/TELESCOPE STR COLUMN
FUNCTIONAL
AM/FM STEREO
AUTO HOLD
BLIS W/CROSS-TRAFFIC ALERT
CLASS IV TRAILER HITCH W/
SMART TRLR TOW CONNECTOR
CURVE CONTROL
FORDPASS™ CONNECT 5GWI-FI
HOTSPOT TELEMATICS MODEM
LANE-KEEPING SYSTEM
POST-COLLISION BRAKING
PRE-COLLISION ASSIST W/AEB
REVERSE SENSING AND
REAR VIEW CAMERA
SELECTABLE DRIVE MODES
SYNC®4 W/EVR & 12" SCREEN
SAFETY/SECURITY
ADVANCETRAC™ WITH RSC®
AIRBAGS - FRONT SEAT
MOUNTED SIDE IMPACT
AIRBAGS - SAFETY CANOPY®
CTR HIGH MOUNT STOP LAMP
PERIMETER ALARM
SECURE PKG 1 YR INCLUDED
SOS POST-CRASH ALERT SYS™
TIRE PRESSURE MONIT SYS
WARRANTY
3YR/36,000 BUMPER / BUMPER
5YR/60,000 POWERTRAIN
5YR/60,000 ROADSIDE ASSIST
8YR/100,000 HYBRID BATTERY
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
Fuel Economy and Environment
Smar
tphone
QR Code™
fueleconomy .gov
Calculate personalized estimates and compare vehicles
Annual fuel cost
Fuel Economy & Greenhouse Gas Rating (tailpipe only)Smog Rating (tailpipe only) Yo u
over 5 years
compared to the
average new vehicle.
21 19 25
4.8 Standard Pickup Trucks range from 12 to
84 MPG. The best vehicle rates 140
MPGe.
$3,000
$2,500
2 B^^^BjCd
MvG<B^^^B
6*"?+/RM!V7rcdR2'
*6
%R\
MV#eT$7*A/9LXq8R(>FPyA
@!///!@w
t3khP
)oe
*~hOrG
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
This vehicle emits
425 grams CO per mile. The best emits 0 grams per mile (tailpipe only). Producing and distributing fuel also create emissions; learn more at fueleconomy.gov.
Actual results will vary for many reasons, including driving conditions and how you drive and maintain your vehicle. The average new vehicle gets 28 MPG and costs $9,500 to fuel over 5 years. Cost estimates are based on 15,000 miles per year at $3.50 per gallon. MPGe is miles per gasoline gallon equivalent. Vehicle emissions are a significant cause of climate change and smog.
Fuel Economy
combined city/hwy
MPG
city highway
gallons per 100 miles
spend
more in fuel costs
ĀÂÞÞÞÂĀзªÏĀå´îòåÝþĀÂÞÞÞÂĀ
¨½«ªââüÔ¯Ú½¯ÑÂÞñçú⧧²£»£
ª½ìÉÖó
°º¸áèóæ»çÌÌ·ÕÎÇà¶Á²¾Ñ
ÌËûû«¬±·¸ÏĀÍåñæµ³òÝÊñ ©»¹ Üåø
ý
õõõ
ýÅÕñýõͽ¥¥±½ÁÍÁõÙõý±á
SCAN OR TEXT TO
1FSKD01762 48028
Msg & Data
rates may
apply.
Text HELP
for help
www.ford.com/help/privacy-terms/
1FTEX1KP7SKD01762
ĬēĂĐĞďĢĂĕĚĈĝĕĎāĂĈćăĬ
KAN-002959 CA 9-NORMAL,NB,202959,RM032 13890 220241211 BLEND 1882
ULC U W CA C
CERT CERT CERT TRD RAMP BUMP CAMP BOOK EXFL ROTA
1FTEX1KP7 SKD01762 NB GU13
VEHICLE DESCRIPTION
F-150
SK D01762
2025 F-150 4X2 SUPER CAB EXTERIOR
145" WHEELBASE OXFORD WHITE
2.7L V6 ECOBOOST INTERIOR
ELEC TEN-SPEED AUTO TRANS DARK SLATE VINYL 40/20/40 2202412111882
ƬōƐŋƔŞƧœƧıƃőƧŊƚŤƪœŸœżŘŴŘžŗƬŕĿŮžƑŬƉŶĽœƑŶİƖıŠĴƚĭšŴƀżĺƂƬĶţŏőƎŽƓŭňƃŏƐŻƨŇłijŃŧƬĶŤƔƤŗƩšŹƉřũƑŹũĹıũơŁơũűƑšƁƑƑʼnƙŹƁ 027157
1949/3794
TOTAL MSRPSunrise Ford
P.O. BOX 310125
Fontana CA 92335
71B 152
CD27
SOLD TO RAMP ONE
SHIP TO (IF OTHER THAN SOLD TO) RAMP TWO
SHIP THROUGH
$44,850.00
FINAL ASSEMBLY PLANT
KANSAS CITY
METHOD OF TRANSP.
CONVOY
ITEM #:
71-F162 O/T 2
RM032 N RB 2X 535 002959 12 03 24
INCLUDED ON THIS VEHICLE
EQUIPMENT GROUP 103A 1,195.00
XL SERIES
LED FOG LAMPS
17" SILVER PAINTED ALUMINUM
CHROME FRONT/REAR BUMPERS
PRIVACY GLASS W/REAR DEFROSTE
OPTIONAL EQUIPMENT/OTHER
.245/70R 17 BSW ALL-SEASON
3.55 RATIO REGULAR AXLE NO CHARGE
6365# GVWR PACKAGE
FRONT LICENSE PLATE BRACKET NO CHARGE
50 STATE EMISSIONS NO CHARGE
EXTENDED RANGE 36GAL FUEL TANK
VINYL 40/20/40 FRONT SEAT NO CHARGE
PRICE INFORMATION
BASE PRICE $41,660.00
TOTAL OPTIONS/OTHER 1,195.00
____________
TOTAL VEHICLE & OPTIONS/OTHER 42,855.00
DESTINATION & DELIVERY 1,995.00
(MSRP)
(MSRP)
STANDARD EQUIPMENT INCLUDED AT NO EXTRA CHARGE
EXTERIOR
DAYTIME RUNNING LAMPS
EASY FUEL® CAPLESS FILLER
FULLY BOXED STEEL FRAME
HEADLAMPS - AUTO HIGH BEAM
HEADLAMPS - AUTOLAMP
(ON/OFF)
LED REFLECTOR HEADLAMPS
LOCKING REMOVABLE TAILGATE
MANUAL FOLD POWER MIRRORS
PICKUP BOX TIE DOWN HOOKS
POWER TAILGATE LOCK
TRAILER SWAY CONTROL
WIPERS- INTERMITTENT
INTERIOR
CRUISE CONTROL
DOOR LOCKS - POWER
DUAL SUNVISORS
ILLUMINATED ENTRY
MESSAGE CTR: OUTSIDE TEMP,
COMPASS, TRIP COMPUTER
TILT/TELESCOPE STR COLUMN
FUNCTIONAL
AM/FM STEREO
AUTO HOLD
BLIS W/CROSS-TRAFFIC ALERT
CLASS IV TRAILER HITCH W/
SMART TRLR TOW CONNECTOR
CURVE CONTROL
FORDPASS™ CONNECT 5GWI-FI
HOTSPOT TELEMATICS MODEM
LANE-KEEPING SYSTEM
POST-COLLISION BRAKING
PRE-COLLISION ASSIST W/AEB
REVERSE SENSING AND
REAR VIEW CAMERA
SELECTABLE DRIVE MODES
SYNC®4 W/EVR & 12" SCREEN
SAFETY/SECURITY
ADVANCETRAC™ WITH RSC®
AIRBAGS - FRONT SEAT
MOUNTED SIDE IMPACT
AIRBAGS - SAFETY CANOPY®
CTR HIGH MOUNT STOP LAMP
PERIMETER ALARM
SECURE PKG 1 YR INCLUDED
SOS POST-CRASH ALERT SYS™
TIRE PRESSURE MONIT SYS
WARRANTY
3YR/36,000 BUMPER / BUMPER
5YR/60,000 POWERTRAIN
5YR/60,000 ROADSIDE ASSIST
8YR/100,000 HYBRID BATTERY
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
Page | 1
STAFF REPORT
DATE: J
UNE 5, 2025
TO: HONO
RABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FRO
M: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
PAUL TOOR, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/ CITY ENGINEER
SUBJE
CT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 12.Q
A RE
SOLUTION OF INTENTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF JURUPA VALLEY TO ESTABLISH CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT N O. PS 2025-002 (PUBLIC
SAFETY, ACTION PLUMBING SUPPLY) AND TO AUTHORIZE THE
LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX WITHIN CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. PS 2025-002 (PUBLIC
SAFETY, ACTION PLUMBING SUPPLY ); GENERALLY LOCATED ON
RIVERVIEW DRIVE NORTH OF MISSION BOULEVARD.
RECOMMENDATION
1) That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2025-52, entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF INTENTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
JURUPA VALLEY TO ESTABLISH CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. PS 202 5-002 (PUBLIC SAFETY, ACTION
PLUMBING SUPPLY) AND TO AUTHORIZE THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX WITHIN CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.
PS 2025-002 (PUBLIC SAFETY, ACTION PLUMBING SUPPLY)
BACKGROUND
The State legislature enacted the Mello- Roos Act of 1982 (the "Act") to assist public agencies in financing certain public services. The legal property owner, Family Properties, LLC, has requested that the City assist them in forming a district for the City to mitigate public safety impacts created by the new commercial retail development named “Action Plumbing Supply.
The Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (the "Act") authorizes the initiation of the establishment of community facilities districts upon receipt by the City of a petition
RETURN TO AGENDA
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
Page | 2
requesting institution of proceedings by owners of not less than 10% of the area of land proposed to be included within the district. The City has received the signed petition from the landowners.
The CFD boundary includes the area of Assessor Parcel Number 179-070-059. The one commercial retail parcel is subject to the special tax . The CFD is comprised of approximately 0.51 gross taxable acres.
The CFD will set up a special tax to generally cover costs associated with providing law enforcement protection services, including but not limited to:
• The costs of contracting services.
• Equipment, vehicles and supplies.
• The salaries and benefits of City staff that directly provide police protection services and other services as defined herein, respectively. • City overhead costs associated with providing such services within the District. • Services related thereto, including collection and accumulation of funds to pay for anticipated operating cost shortfalls.
The City began the formation process for CFD PS 2025- 002 (PS, Action plumbing Supply) on April 3
rd, 2025 with the City Council approving Resolution No. 2025- 28. The City hereby abandons that formation proceeding and begins a new formation proceeding.
The assessment amounts from the April 3
rd meeting and this new formation are remaining
unchanged.
ANALY
SIS
Approval of the attached Resolution is required under the Act to levy a special tax and fund certain services. The attached Resolution declares the City Council's intention to form the proposed CFD No. PS 2025-002 (Public Safety, Action Plumbing Supply) and to authorize the levy of a special tax in accordance with the attached Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Tax. The attached Resolution is the initial step for forming the CFD pursuant to the procedures prescribed by the Act, which include holdin g a public hearing and submitting the formation of the proposed CFD to the landowner at special election to be conducted by mailed ballot.
The FY 24-25 base year special tax was set in the following amount:
SPECI
AL
TAX
Single Family Residential Property (Dwelling Unit) $343.00 Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
Page | 3
Multifamily Residential Property (Dwelling Unit) $206.00 Commercial Retail Property (Building Square Feet) $0.126 Commercial Other Property (Building Square Feet) $0.094 Business Park Property (Building Square Feet) $0.084
Light Industrial Property (Building Square Feet) $0.044 Heavy Industrial Property (Building Square Feet) $0.037 These rates will increase based on the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index, for Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario area, with a maximum annual increase of 6% and a minimum annual increase of 2% of the Maximum Special Tax in effect in the previous fiscal year , beginning July 1, 2025. The owner has filed a petition representing their willingness to move forward. Due to the timing of the district formation, the first year of levied special tax will be FY 2025-2026.
OTHER INFORMATION
A public hearing on this matter will take place on July 17, 2025 or as soon thereafter and at that time, the Council will hear any testimony concerning the formation and take action to adopt the "Resolution of Formation."
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The individual property owner is responsible for the annual payments of special taxes.
The City will work with the County concerning the filing of the annual special tax to the County Auditor-Controller. Using the base year rates of fiscal year 2024-25, the estimated maximum annual assessment for the CFD, if levied, would be $1,226.74, as summarized below:
APNs Description Tax per
Taxable
Unit
Building
Square
Feet
FY 2024-25
Estimated
Revenue
179-070-059 Commercial
Retail
$.126 9,736 $1,226.74
The property owners posted a deposit with its application to form the CFD in order to cover City costs incurred in connection with the formation. Approval of this resolution does Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
Page | 4
not in any way commit the City to any financial contribution or liability by the CFD. The City's cost to administer the CFD annually will be reimbursed through the special taxes charged to property owners.
The revenue and expense will be part of the City's FY202 5-2026 adopted budget and there are no additional fiscal impacts.
ALTERNATIVES
1. T ake no action.
2. Provide staff with further direction.
************************** SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE **************************
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
Prepared by
�
Yash Patel
Assistant Engineer
Reviewed by:
Reviewed By:
Peter M. Thorson
City Attorney
Attachments:
1. Resolution No. 2025-52
2. Rate and Method of Apportionment
3. Proposed Boundary Map
www.jurupavalley.org
Reviewed by:
Reviewed by:
Michael Flad
Assistant City Manager
Rod B. Butler
City Manager
Page I 5
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
-1-
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-52
A RES
OLUTION OF INTENTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA TO ESTABLISH CITY OF
JURUPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. PS 2025- 002 (PUBLIC SAFETY, ACTION PLUMBING SUPPLY) AND TO
AUTHORIZE THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX WITHIN CITY OF
JURUPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. PS 2025- 002 (PUBLIC SAFETY, ACTION PLUMBING SUPPLY)
RECITALS:
WHEREAS, this City Council (the "City Council") of the City of Jurupa Valley (the "City") has received a petition (the "Petition") requesting the institution of proceedings, which is signed by the owner of the land proposed for inclusion in a proposed community facilities district (the "Owner") and which meet the requirements of Sections 53318 and 53319 of the Mello- Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended, being Chapter 2.5 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the California Government Code (the "Act"); and
WH
EREAS, the Act authorizes the City Council to establish a community facilities district and to levy special taxes within that district; and
WH
EREAS, in accordance with the request set forth in the Petition, the City Council desires to undertake proceedings to establish a community facilities district pursuant to the Act to finance certain services which are in addition to services currently provided in the territory of the proposed district and are necessary to meet increased demands placed upon the City as a result of the development of such land;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY:
1. Intention. The City Council hereby declares its intention to conduct proceedings for the formation of a community facilities district under the terms of the Act.
2. Na
me of District. The name of the proposed community facilities district is "City of Jurupa Valley Community Facilities District No. PS 2025-002 (Public Safety, Action Plumbing Supply)" (the "District").
3. Bounda
ries of District. The exterior boundaries of the District are shown on the map now on file in the office of the City Clerk entitled "Proposed Boundary of Community Facilities District No. PS 2025- 002 (Public Safety, Action Plumbing Supply)" (the "Map"). The Map indicates by a boundary line, the extent of the territory included in the proposed District and shall govern for all details as to the extent of the District. On the original and one copy of the Map, the City Clerk shall endorse the certificate evidencing the date and adoption of this Resolution. The City Clerk shall file the original of the Map in her office and, within fifteen days after the adoption of this Resolution, the City Clerk shall file a copy of the Map so endorsed in the records of the County Recorder, County of Riverside, State of Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
-2-
California, and in any event this Map shall be filed no later than fifteen days before the public hearing specified in Section 6 below.
4. Services. The type of services proposed to be provided within the District and to be financed under the Act shall consist of those set forth on Exhibit "A" (the "Services"), attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The Services are in addition to services currently provided in the District and are necessary to meet increased demands placed upon the City as a result of the development occurring in the District.
5. Special Tax.
a. Except where funds are otherwise available to pay for the Services, it is the intention of the City Council, commencing Fiscal Year 2025-2026, to levy annually in accordance with procedures contained in the Act a special tax (the "Special Tax") within the District sufficient to pay for the costs thereof, including incidental expenses. The types of incidental expenses proposed to be incurred are set forth in Exhibit "B." The Special Tax will be secured by recordation of a continuing lien against all non- exempt real property in the District and will be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, or in such other manner as may be provided by the City Council including, without limitation, direct billing of the affected property owner, and shall be subject to the same penalties, procedure, sale and lien priority in case of delinquency as applicable for ad valorem property taxes. In the first year in which the Special Tax is levied, the levy shall include a sum sufficient to repay to the City all amounts, if any, transferred to the District pursuant to Section 53314 of the Act and interest thereon.
b. The proposed Rate and Method of Apportionment of the Special Tax (the "Rate and Method") among parcels of real property in the District, in sufficient detail to allow each resident or landowner within the proposed District to estimate the maximum amount su ch resident or owner will have to pay, is shown in Exhibit "C," attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The City Council hereby determines the Rate and Method set forth in Exhibit "C" to be reasonable.
6. Hearing. A public hearing on the establishment of the District, the extent of the District, the furnishing of Services within the District, and the proposed Rate and Method (the "Hearing") shall be held on July 17th , 2025, at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as practicable, at the chambers of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley, 8930 Limonite, Jurupa Valley, California 92509. At the Hearing, any interested person or taxpayer, including all persons owning lands or registered to vote within the proposed District, may appear and be heard.
7. Report. The Staff of the City is directed to study the proposed District and prepare for filing at the Hearing the report required by Section 53321.5 of the Act. The staff of the City may delegate to consultants of the City the duty to perform the study and prepare the report.
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
-3-
8. Ad
vances. The City may accept advances of funds or work in-kind from any source, including, but not limited to, private persons or private entities, and is authorized and directed to use such funds or that work in- kind for any authorized purpose, including, but not limited to, paying any cost incurred by the City in creating the District. The City may enter into an agreement with the person or entity advancing the funds or work- in-kind, to repay all or a portion of the funds advanced, or to reimburse the person or entity for the value, or cost, whichever is less, of the work- in-kind, as determined by the City Council, with or without interest.
9. Publ
ished Notice. The City Clerk is hereby directed to publish a notice of the Hearing ("Notice") pursuant to Section 6061 of the California Government Code in a newspaper of general circulation published in the area of the proposed District.
Such Notice shall be substantially in the form specified in Section 53222 of the Act.
Publication of the Notice shall be completed at least seven days prior to the date of the Hearing.
10. Ma
iled Notice. The City Clerk is hereby directed to send a copy of the Notice of the Hearing by first-class mail, postage prepaid, to each registered voter and to each landowner within the proposed District as shown on the last equalized assessment roll. Mailing of the Notice shall be completed at least fifteen days prior to the date of the Hearing.
11. Vot
ing. Should the City Council determine to form the District, a special election will be held within the District to authorize the levy of the Special Tax in accordance with the procedures contained in Section 53326 of the Act. If held, the proposed voting procedure at the election will be a landowner vote with each landowner who is the owner of record of land within the District at the close of the Hearing, or the authorized representative thereof, having one vote for each acre or portion thereof owned within the District. Ballots for the special election may be distributed by mail with return postage prepaid or by personal service.
12. Exe
mptions from Special Tax. Except as may otherwise be provided in Exhibit "C" hereto or by law, all lands owned by any public entity, including the United States, the State of California and/or the City, or any departments or political subdivisions thereof, shall be omitted from the levy of the Special Tax to be made to cover the costs and expenses of the Services. In addition, reference is hereby made to Exhibit "C" for a description of other lands which shall be omitted from the levy of the Special Tax.
13. El
ection to Perform Work. Pursuant to 53329.5(c) of the Act, the City Council finds that, in its opinion, the public interest will not be served by allowing property owners in the District to enter into a contract pursuant to Section 53329.5(a) Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
-4-
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 5th day of June, 2025.
Brian Berkson
Mayor
ATTEST:
Evelyne Ssenkoloto
Interim City Clerk
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
-5-
CERTIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )
I, Evelyne Ssenkoloto, Interim City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2025-52 was duly passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on the 5 th day of June, 2025 by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 5th day of June, 2025.
Evelyne Ssenkoloto, Interim City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
A-1
EXHIBIT “A”
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES
Authorized Services for the Special Tax shall be the following:
The cost associated with providing law enforcement services, including but not limited to:
• The costs of contracting services
• Equipment, vehicles and supplies;
• The salaries and benefits of City staff that directly provide law enforcement services;
• City overhead costs associated with providing such services within the District; • All other services necessary or useful for, or in connection with, the authorized services listed above, including building a reserve fund for replacement and maintenance and for anticipated operating cost shortfalls.
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
B-1
EXHIBIT “B”
INCIDENTAL EXPENSES
Incidental Expenses for the Special Tax shall be the following:
The cost of the Incidental Expenses shall be the costs associated with formation of the District, determination of the amount of the Special Tax, collection of the Special Tax, payment of the Special Tax, costs incurred in order to carry out the authorized purposes of the District, and the costs of engineering, inspecting, coordinating, completing, planning and designing the Services, including the costs of any environmental evaluations.
The following incidental expenses are examples of those that may be incurred in the formation of the District: engineering services, publishing, mailing and posting of notices, governmental notification and filing costs, e lection costs, and charges and fees of the City other than those waived.
The following incidental expenses are examples of those that may be incurred in each annual Special Tax levy: necessary consultant costs, costs of posting and collecting the special taxes, and administrative costs of the City related to each annual Special Tax levy.
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
C-1
EXHIBIT “C”
RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAX
(Please see attached)
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAX FOR
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. PS 2025-002
(PUBLIC SAFETY, ACTION PLUMBING SUPPLY)
OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
A Special Tax (all capitalized terms are defined in Section A., “Definitions”, below) shall be applicable to each Parcel of Taxable Property located within the boundaries of Community Facilities District No. PS 2025-002 (Public Safety, Action Plumbing Supply).
The amount of Special Tax to be levied on a Parcel in each Fiscal Year, commencing in Fiscal Year 2025-2026, shall be determined by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley, acting in its capacity as the legislative body of the CFD by applying the appropriate Special Tax as set forth in Sections B., C., and D., below. All of the real property within the CFD, unless exempted by law or by the provisions of Section E. below, shall be taxed for the purposes, to the extent and in the manner herein provided.
A. DEFINITIONS
The terms hereinafter set forth have the following meanings:
“Acre or Acreage” means the land area of a Parcel as indicated on the most recent Assessor’s Parcel Map, or if the land area is not shown on the Assessor’s Parcel Map, the land area shown on the applicable Final Map, condominium plan, or other recorded County map or the land area calculated to the reasonable satisfaction of the Administrator using the boundaries set forth on such map or plan. The square footage of a Parcel is equal to the Acreage of such Parcel multiplied by 43,560. “Act” means the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended, being Chapter 2.5 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California.
“Administrative Expenses” means all actual or reasonably estimated costs and expenses of the City that are chargeable or allocable to carry out its duties as the administrator of the CFD as allowed by the Act, which shall include without limitation, all costs and expenses arising out of or resulting from the annual levy and collection of the Special Tax (whether by the City or designee thereof or both), any litigation or appeal involving the CFD, and other administrative expenses of the City or designee thereof, or both, directly related to the CFD. Administrative Expenses shall also include amounts estimated or advanced by the City or CFD for attorney’s fees and other costs related to commencing and pursuing to completion any foreclosure as a result of delinquent Special Taxes.
“Administrator” means an official of the City, or designee thereof, responsible for determining the annual amount of the levy and collection of the Special Taxes. “Approved Property” means all Parcels of Taxable Property: (i) that are included in a Final Map that was recorded prior to the January 1st preceding the Fiscal Year in which the Special Tax is being levied, and (ii) that have not been issued a Building Permit prior to the April 1st preceding the Fiscal Year in which the Special Tax is being levied.
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
“Assessor” means the Assessor of the County.
“Assessor’s Parcel Map” means an official map of the Assessor of the County designating Parcels by Assessor’s Parcel Number.
“Assessor’s Parcel Number” means the number assigned to a lot or Parcel for purposes of identification as determined from an Assessor Parcel Map or the applicable assessment roll.
“Base Year” means the Fiscal Year ending June 30, 2025.
“Boundary Map” means a recorded map of the CFD which indicates by a boundary line the extent of the territory identified to be subject to the levy of Special Taxes.
"Building Permit" means the first legal document issued by a local agency giving official permission for new construction.
"Building Square Footage" means the floor area square footage reflected on the original construction building permit issued for construction of a building of Non‐Residential Property and any Building Square Footage subsequently added to a building of such Non ‐Residential Property after issuance of a building permit for expansion or renovation of such building.
“Business Park Property” means Business Park land use as defined in the City of Jurupa Valley General Plan, 2017 or as amended. If the development is subject to a Specific Plan, Development Agreement or other overriding legal instrument that deviates from the General Plan, the definitions in that document shall be the authorized definition.
“CFD” means Community Facilities District No. PS 2025-002 (Public Safety, Action Plumbing Supply) of the City of Jurupa Valley.
“City” means the City of Jurupa Valley, California.
“Commercial Other Property” means all Commercial land uses as defined in the City of Jurupa Valley General Plan, 2017 or as amended, other than Commercial Retail Property. If the development is subject to a Specific Plan, Development Agreement or other overriding legal instrument that deviates from the General Plan, the definitions in that document shall be the authorized definition.
“Commercial Retail Property” means Commercial Retail land use as defined in the City of Jurupa Valley General Plan, 2017 or as amended. If the development is subject to a Specific Plan, Development Agreement or other overriding legal instrument that deviates from the General Plan, the definitions in that document shall be the authorized definition.
“Consumer Price Index” means the Consumer Price Index published by the U.S.
Bureau of Labor Statistic for “All Urban Consumers in the Riverside-San Bernardino- Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
Ontario Area, measured as of the month of March in the Calendar Year which ends in the previous Fiscal Year. In the event this index ceases to be published, the Consumer Price Index shall be another index as determined by the Administrator that is reasonably comparable to the Consumer Price Index for the Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario Area.
“Council” means the City Council of the City acting as the legislative body of the CFD.
“County” means the County of Riverside, California.
“Developed Property” means all Parcels of Taxable Property: (i) that are included in a Final Map that was recorded prior to January 1 st preceding the Fiscal Year in which the Special Tax is being levied, and (ii) for which a Building Permit for new construction has been issued prior to April 1st preceding the Fiscal Year in which the Special Tax is being levied.
“Dwelling Unit” or “(D/U)” means a residential unit that is used or intended to be used as a domicile by one or more persons, as determined by the Administrator.
“Exempt Property” means any Parcel which is exempt from Special Taxes pursuant to Section E., below.
“Final Map” means a subdivision of property by recordation of a final map, parcel map or lot line adjustment, pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act (California Government Code Section 66410 et seq .) or recordation of a condominium plan pursuant to California Civil Code 1352 that creates individual lots for which Building Permits may be issued without further subdivision.
“Fiscal Year” means the 12 month period starting on July 1 of any calendar year and ending the following June 30.
“Heavy Industrial Property” means Heavy Industrial land use as defined in the City of Jurupa Valley General Plan, 2017 or as amended. If the development is subject to a Specific Plan, Development Agreement or other overriding legal instrument that deviates from the General Plan, the definitions in that document shall be the authorized definition.
“Incidental Expenses” means the costs associated with formation of the District, determination of the amount of the Special Tax, collection of the Special Tax, payment of the Special Tax, costs incurred in order to carry out the authorized purposes of the District, and the costs of engineering, inspecting, coordinating, completing, planning and designing the Services, including the costs of any environmental evaluations.
“Land Use Class” means any of the classes listed in Table 1 of Section C. below.
“Light Industrial Property” means Light Industrial land use as defined in the City of Jurupa Valley General Plan, 2017 or as amended. If the development is subject to a Specific Plan, Development Agreement or other overriding legal instrument that Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
deviates from the General Plan, the definitions in that document shall be the authorized definition.
“Maximum Special Tax” means for each Parcel in each Fiscal Year, the greatest amount of Special Tax, determined in accordance with Section C, below, which may be levied on such Parcel in such Fiscal Year
“Multifamily Residential Property ” means all Multifamily Residential land uses as defined in the City of Jurupa Valley General Plan, 2017 or as amended, and consisting of a building or buildings comprised of attached Dwelling Units available for rental by the general public, not for sale to an end user, and under common management. If the development is subject to a Specific Plan, Development Agreement or other overriding legal instrument that deviates from the General Plan, the definitions in that document shall be the authorized definition.
“Parcel(s)” means a lot or parcel within the CFD shown on an Assessor’s Parcel Map with an assigned Assessor’s Parcel Number valid as of July 1 st for the Fiscal Year for which the Special Tax is being levied.
“Property Owner’s Association Property” means all Parcels which have been conveyed, dedicated to, or irrevocably offered for dedication to a property owner association, including any master or sub-association, prior to April 1 st preceding the Fiscal Year in which the Special Tax is being levied.
“Proportionately” means for Parcels of Taxable Property that are (i) Single Family Property, that the ratio of the actual Special Tax levy to Maximum Special Tax is the same for all Parcels of Single Family Property, (ii) Multifamily Residential Property, that the ratio of the actual Special Tax levy to the Maximum Special Tax is the same for all Parcels of Multifamily Residential Property, (iii) Non-Residential Property, that the ratio of the actual Special Tax levy to the Maximum Special Tax is the same for all Parcels of Non-Residential Property and (iv) Approved Property, that the ratio of the actual Special Tax levy to the Maximum Special Tax is the same for all Parcels of Approved Property.
“Public Property” means all Parcels which, as of April 1st preceding the Fiscal Year in which the Special Tax is being levied, are (i) used for rights-of-way or any other purpose and is owned by, dedicated to, or irrevocably offered for dedication to the federal government, the State, the County, City or any other public agency, provided, however, that any property leased by a public agency to a private entity and subject to taxation under Section 53340.1 of the Act shall be taxed and classified according to its use; or (ii) encumbered by an unmanned utility easement making impractical its utilization for other than the purpose set forth in the easement.
“Residential Property” means all Parcels of Taxable Property as defined in the City of Jurupa Valley General Plan, 2017 or as amended with one or more residential Dwelling Units. If the development is subject to a Specific Plan, Development Agreement or other overriding legal instrument that deviates from the General Plan, the definitions in that document shall be the authorized definition.
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
“Single Family Residential Property” means all Single Family land uses as defined in the City of Jurupa Valley General Plan, 2017 or as amended, including condominiums, and excluding Multifamily Residential Property. If the development is subject to a Specific Plan, Development Agreement or other overriding legal instrument that deviates from the General Plan, the definitions in that document shall be the authorized definition.
“Special Tax(es)” means the Special Tax to be levied in each Fiscal Year on each Parcel of Taxable Property in accordance with Section D.
“Special Tax Requirement” means for each Fiscal Year, that amount required to: (i) pay the estimated cost of Special Tax Services for such Fiscal Year as determined by the City; (ii) pay amount required to establish or replenish any reserve fund established in connection with the CFD, (iii) pay Administrative Expenses; (iv) pay for the actual or anticipated shortfall due to Special Tax delinquencies in the current or prior Fiscal Year; and (v) less a credit for funds available to reduce the annual Special Tax levy as determined by the Administrator.
“Special Tax Services” means the cost associated with providing law enforcement services, including but not limited to (i) the costs of contracting services, (ii) equipment, vehicles, supplies, (iii) the salaries and benefits of City staff that directly provide law enforcement services, (iv) City overhead costs associated with providing such services within the District, (v) all other services necessary or useful for, or in connection with, the authorized services listed above, including building a reserve fund for replacement and maintenance and for anticipated operating cost shortfalls, and (vi) Incidental Expenses.
“State” means the State of California.
“Taxable Property” means all Parcels within the boundary of the CFD pursuant to the Boundary Map which are not exempt from the Special Tax pursuant to Section E., below.
“Taxable Unit” means either a Dwelling Unit, Building Square Footage, Parcel or an Acre, as shown in Table 1 or Table 2.
“Undeveloped Property” means all Parcels of Taxable Property not classified as Developed Property, Approved Property, Public Property or Property Owner’s Association Property.
B. ASSIGNMENT TO LAND USE CLASS
Each Fiscal Year, commencing with Fiscal Year 2025-2026, all Parcels of Taxable Property shall be classified as either Developed Property, Approved Property, Undeveloped Property, Public Property or Property Owner’s Association Property, and subject to the levy of Special Taxes in accordance with this Rate and Method of Apportionment as determined pursuant to Sections C. and D.
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
Parcels of Developed Property shall further be classified as Residential Property or Non-Residential Property. Parcels of Residential Property shall further be classified as Single Family Property or Multifamily Residential Property.
C. MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX RATES
1. Developed Property
The Maximum Special Tax that may be levied and escalated, as explained further in Section C.1. (a) below, in any Fiscal Year for each Parcel classified as Developed Property shall be determined by reference to Table 1 below.
TABLE 1
Maximum Special Tax Rates for Developed
Property for Fiscal Year 2024-2025
Land
Use
Class
Description Taxable
Unit
Maximum
Special Tax per
Taxable Unit
1 Single Family Residential Property Dwelling
Unit $ 343.00
2 Multifamily Residential Property Dwelling
Unit $ 206.00
3 Commercial Retail Property
Building
Square
Footage
$ 0.126
4 Commercial Other Property
Building
Square
Footage
$ 0.094
5 Business Park Property
Building
Square
Footage
$ 0.084
6 Light Industrial Property
Building
Square
Footage
$ 0.044
7 Heavy Industrial Property
Building
Square
Footage
$ 0.037
(a) Increase in the Maximum Special Tax
On each July 1, following the Base Year, the Maximum Special Tax, identified in Table 1, above, shall be increased annually, commencing July 1, 2025, based on the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index with a maximum annual Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
increase of six percent (6%) and a minimum annual increase of two percent (2%) of the Maximum Special Tax in effect in the previous Fiscal Year.
(b) Multiple Land Use Classes
In some instances, a Parcel of Developed Property may contain more than one Land Use Class. The Maximum Special Tax that may be levied on such Parcel shall be the sum of the Maximum Special Tax that can be levied for each Land Use Class located on that Parcel. For a Parcel that contains more than one Land Use Class, the Acreage of such Parcel shall be allocated to each type of property based on the amount of Acreage designated for each land use as determined by reference to the site plan approved for such Parcel. The Administrator’s allocation to each Land Use Class shall be final.
2. Approved Property
The Maximum Special Tax that may be levied and escalated, as explained further in Section C.2. (a) below, in any Fiscal Year for each Parcel classified as Approved Property shall be determined by reference to Table 2 below.
TABLE 2
Maximum Special Tax Rates for Approved
Property for Fiscal Year 2024-2025
Land
Use
Class
Description Taxable
Unit
Maximum
Special Tax per
Taxable Unit
8 Approved Property Parcel $ 100.00
(a) Increase in the Maximum Special Tax
On each July 1, following the Base Year, the Maximum Special Tax, identified in Table 1, above, shall be increased annually, commencing July 1, 2025, based on the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index with a maximum annual increase of six percent (6%) and a minimum annual increase of two percent (2%) of the Maximum Special Tax in effect in the previous Fiscal Year.
3. Undeveloped Property
No Special Tax shall be levied on Undeveloped Property.
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
D. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF THE SPECIAL TAX
Commencing with Fiscal Year 2025-2026 and for each following Fiscal Year, the Administrator shall levy the Special Tax on all Taxable Property until the amount of Special Tax equals the Special Tax Requirement in accordance with the following steps:
First: The Special Tax shall be levied Proportionately on each Parcel of Developed Property at up to 100% of the applicable Maximum Special Tax as needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement; and
Second: If additional moneys are needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement after the first step has been completed, the Special Tax shall be levied Proportionately on each Parcel of Approved Property at up to 100% of the Maximum Special Tax for Approved Property. Notwithstanding the forgoing sentence, no Special Tax shall be levied on Approved Property to fund items (ii) and (iii) of the Special Tax Requirement.
E. EXEMPTIONS
The CFD shall not levy Special Taxes on Public Property and Property Owner’s Association Property within the CFD.
F. MANNER OF COLLECTION
The Special Tax shall be collected in the same manner and at the same time as ordinary ad valorem property taxes and shall be subject to the same penalties, the same procedure, sale and lien priority in the case of delinquency; provided, however, that the Administrator may directly bill the Special Tax, may collect Special Taxes at a different time or in a different manner if necessary to meet the financial obligations of the CFD, and provided further that the CFD may covenant to foreclose and may actually foreclose on Parcels having delinquent Special Taxes as permitted by the Act.
G. APPEALS
Any taxpayer may file a written appeal of the Special Tax on his/her Parcel(s) with the Administrator, provided that the appellant is current in his/her payments of Special Taxes. During pendency of an appeal, all Special Taxes must be paid on or before the payment due date established when the levy was made. The appeal must specify the reasons why the appellant claims the Special Tax is in error. The Administrator shall review the appeal, meet with the appellant if the Administrator deems necessary, and advise the appellant of its determination. If the Administrator agrees with the appellant, the Administrator shall grant a credit to eliminate or reduce future Special Taxes on the appellant’s Parcel(s). No refunds of previously paid Special Taxes shall be made.
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
The Administrator shall interpret this Rate and Method of Apportionment and make determinations relative to the annual levy and administration of the Special Tax and any taxpayer who appeals, as herein specified.
H. PREPAYMENT
The Special Taxes may not be prepaid.
I. TERM OF THE SPECIAL TAX
The Special Tax shall be levied annually in perpetuity unless terminated earlier by the City.
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
PROPOSED BOUNDARY OF
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. PS 2025-002
(PUBLIC SAFETY, ACTION PLUMBING SUPPLY)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
N
No Scale
2375 Northside Drive Suite 125, San Diego, Ca 92108 p: 619.236.1778 ext. 1261 www.WeAreHarris.com
CLERK'S MAP STATEMENT
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF
JURUPA VALLEY THIS DAY OF , 2025.
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
CLERK'S MAP STATEMENT
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE AREA SHOWN ON THIS MAP
OF THE PROPOSED BOUNDARY OF COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. PS 2025-002 (PUBLIC SAFETY,
ACTION PLUMBING SUPPLY), CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY,
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, WAS
APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
JURUPA VALLEY AT A REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETING
THEREOF, HELD ON THE DAY OF
, 2025 BY ITS RESOLUTION NO. .
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
COUNTY RECORDER'S FILING STATEMENT
FILED THIS DAY OF , 2025
AT THE HOUR OF O'CLOCK .M. IN BOOK
OF MAPS OF ASSESSMENT AND COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICTS PAGE NO. IN THE OFFICE OF
THE COUNTY RECORDER IN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
PETER ALDANA
COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
BY:
DEPUTY
FILE:THE LINES AND DIMENSIONS OF EACH LOT OR PARCEL SHOWN ON THIS MAP SHALL BE THOSE LINES AND DIMENSIONS AS SHOWN ON THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY ASSESSOR’S MAPS.
Special Tax Boundary
Parcel Boundary
Legend
ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER LOCATED
WITHIN PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.
PS 2025-002 (PUBLIC SAFETY , ACTION
PLUMBING SUPPLY) AS OF
FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
179-070-059
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
Page | 1
STAFF REPORT
DATE: JUNE 5, 2025
TO: HO
NORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FR
OM: ROD BUTLER, CITY MANAGER
PAUL TOOR, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/ CITY ENGINEER
SUBJ
ECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 12.R
RES
OLUTION NO. 2025-53 AND RESOLUTION NO. 2025- 54
REGARDING THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 89 1 CONSOLIDATED - CITYWIDE
RECO
MMENDATION
1) That
the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2025-53, entitled:
A RES
OLUTION OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY ORDERING THE
PREPARATION OF THE ENGINEER’S REPORT REGARDING PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS TO BE LEVIED AND COLLECTED FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025 - 26 WITHIN ZONES 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 173, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S, T, U, W, X, Y, Z; AA, DD, EE, FF, GG, II, JJ, KK, LL, MM, QQ AND STREET LIGHTING ZONES 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2- E, 2 -F, 2-G, 2 -H AND 2 -I OF CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89-1- CONSOLIDATED PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972.
2) That
the City Council adopt Resolution No 2025-54, entitled:
RES
OLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY,
CALIFORNIA, DECLARING INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT
ASSESSMENTS WITHIN ZONES 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 173, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O,
RETURN TO AGENDA
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
Page | 2
P, S, T, U, W, X, Y, Z; AA, DD, EE, FF, GG, II, JJ, KK, LL, MM, QQ AND STREET LIGHTING ZONES 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2 -A, 2-B, 2-C, 2 -D, 2 -E, 2 -F, 2 -G, 2 -H AND 2 -I OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89 -1-
CONSOLIDATED OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 FOR THE MAINTENANCE AND
SERVICING OF LANDSCAPING, MULTI -PURPOSE TRAILS, FENCING,
FOSSIL FILTERS, BIO- SWALES, GRAFFITI ABATEMENT, TRAFFIC SIGNALS, BRIDGE LIGHTS, AND STREETLIGHTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025 - 26 ; AND GIVING NOTICE OF AND SETTING THE TIME AND PLACE OF THE
PUBLIC HEARING ON THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT AND ORDERING NOTICE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING TO BE PUBLISHED.
BACKG
ROUND
In ac
cordance with the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (the Act) being Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (the “Act”) and Article XIII D of the California Constitution (“Proposition 218”), the City Council may conduct proceedings to annex territory into an assessment district formed under the Act and to levy assessments within such territory. In connection with the incorporation of the City of Jurupa Valley in 2011, the Local Agency Formation Commission of Riverside County (LAFCO) adopted its Resolution No. 12- 10 on July 22, 2010, which transferred the authority and responsibility for special assessment districts within the incorporated City to the City of Jurupa Valley. Thereafter, City Council adopted Resolution No. 11- 26 on July 1, 2011, by which the City assumes all authority and responsibility for the special assessment districts. The County’s Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89- 1-Consolidated (the “County District”), established pursuant to the provisions of the Act , includes various territories located both within the incorporated boundaries of the City (the “City Territory”) and outside the incorporated boundaries of the City (the “County Territory”). Pursuant to its Resolution No. 2016-01 adopted on February 4, 2016, the City declared that the City Territory is a district under the 1972 Act, which is separate and distinct from the County Territory, and designated such territory as the “Jurupa Valley Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89-1-Consolidated” (the “District”).
The District maintains and services 77 zones with 87 locations throughout the City of Jurupa Valley which includes 54 landscaping assessment zones and 23 street lighting assessment zones as described in Attachment 1 . In accordance with t he Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 staff prepared the following annual resolutions for adoption:
1. Re
solution No. 2025-53: Approving the annual Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year (FY 2025-26).
2. Re
solution No. 2025 -54: Declaring the intention to levy and collect the annual assessments for FY 2025-26.
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
Page | 3
ANALYSIS
Adoption of Resolution No. 2025- 53 and Resolution No. 2025- 54 begins the annual process to levy and collect assessments for FY 2025-26 for the zones previously annexed to the District. A description of the installation, maintenance, and servicing of these zones is provided in the Engineer’s Report, Volumes 1 and 2, included as Attachments 4 and 5 respectively. The next step is a public hearing to receive public testimony regarding the proposed annual assessments. Following public testimony, the City Council may adopt a resolution confirming the assessable zones for FY 2025- 26. If so approved, the City will submit the tax rolls to the County of Riverside Auditor Controller’s Office to facilitate the collection of assessments in accordance with the Act and Proposition 218.
The public hearing is scheduled for 7:00 p.m. on July 17, 2025.
OTHER INFORMATION
Of the 77 zones, Zone 95, Zone 102, Zone 128, Zone 141, Zone C, Zone DD and Street Lighting Zone 69 are not yet maintained and not assessed. Zone AA is dormant and not assessed. Should the status of these 8 zones remain the same prior to submission of fixed charges to the County of Riverside Auditor Controller’s Office, the assessment s totaling $467,793.42 will not be submitted and therefore not collected.
Zone JJ, Zone LL, Zone MM, and Zone QQ are expected to start maintenance in FY 2025-2026. Staff will return to City Council at a future date with recommendations to annex these 4 zones to the District and to levy and collect assessments totaling $78,741.16.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The estimated revenues from all existing zones and the zones expected to start maintenance in FY 2025-26 is $1,597,388.99. A breakdown of the assessments for each zone is provided in Attachment 3.
As a matter of urgency this item must appear on the June 5, 2025 City Council agenda in order to set the July 17, 2025 public hearing; failure to do so will result in loss of District revenue for FY 20 25-26 for the maintenance of landscaping, trails, fencing, fossil filters and street lights within certain areas of the City of Jurupa Valley.
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
Page | 4
ALTERNATIVES
1. Tak
e no action. This would mean that the City of Jurupa Valley could not continue collecting assessments to pay for maintenance of improvements in these specific rights-of-way and would need to discontinue (a) the maintenance of landscaping, trails, fencing, and irrigation services to these areas, in certain zones, (b) maintaining the fossil filters in certain zones as required by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding compliance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit, and (c) paying Edison for street light energy costs in certain zones.
2. Pr
ovide staff with further direction.
**************************
SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE ************************** Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
Prepared by: Reviewed by:
p Yash Patel
Assistant Engineer P rks Director/City Engineer
Reviewed by:
sk=
Director of Finance
Approved as to form:
Peter M. Thorson
City Attorney
Attachments:
Reviewed by:
Michael Flad
Assistant City Manager
�-�
Rod B. Butler
City Manager
1. Resolution No. 2025-53 Annual Engineer's Report
2. Resolution No. 2025-
54 Annual Intention to Levy and Collect
3. FY 25-26 Engineer's Report Volume 1
4. FY 25-26 Engineer's Report Volume 2
www. j uru pavalley.org
Page I 5
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
-1-
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-53
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY ORDERING THE
PREPARATION OF THE ENGINEER’S REPORT REGARDING
PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS TO BE LEVIED AND COLLECTED FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 WITHIN ZONES 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 173, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S, T, U, W, X, Y, Z; AA, DD, EE, FF, GG, II, JJ, KK, LL, MM, QQ AND STREET LIGHTING ZONES 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2- A, 2 -B, 2- C, 2 -D, 2 -E, 2- F, 2 -G, 2-H AND 2 -I OF CITY OF
JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NO. 89 -1- CONSOLIDATED PURSUANT TO THE
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972
WHEREAS, the City Council (hereinafter the “City Council”) of the City of Jurupa Valley (hereinafter the “City”) has conducted proceedings for and has established City of Jurupa Valley Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89-1- Consolidated of the County of Riverside, State of California (hereinafter “JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C”) pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 (commencing with Section 22500) of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code (hereinafter the “Streets and Highways Code”); for the installation and planting of landscaping; the installation of multi -purpose trails; the installation of fencing; the installation of fossil filters; the installation of irrigation or electrical facilities; and the maintenance and servicing of such landscaping, multi-purpose trails, fencing, fossil filters, bio-swales, irrigation or electrical facilities, streetlights, bridge lights and traffic signal improvements, including the provision of electricity for streetlights, bridge lights and traffic signals within the public rights-of- way; and graffiti abatement; and
WHEREAS, JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C presently consists of 77 Zones and as ordered by the City Council, its Designee has filed with the City Clerk an Engineer’s Report (hereinafter the " Report " ) regarding the assessments to be levied and collected within 54 Zones (hereinafter “Zone 4", “Zone 5", “Zone 6", “Zone 7", “Zone 9", “Zone 14", “Zone 16", “Zone 17", “Zone 21", “Zone 34", “Zone 61", “Zone 73", “Zone 78", “Zone 95", “Zone 102", “Zone 106", “Zone 126", “Zone 128", “Zone 132", “Zone 137", “Zone 141", “Zone 142", “Zone 173", “Zone 182” , “Zone A” , “Zone C” , “Zone E” , “Zone F” , “Zone G” , “Zone I”, “Zone K”, ”Zone L”, “Zone M”, Zone N”, “Zone O”, “Zone P”, “Zone S”, “Zone T”, “Zone U”, “Zone W”, “Zone X”, “Zone Y”, “Zone Z”, “Zone AA”, “Zone DD”, “Zone EE”, “Zone FF”, “Zone GG”, “Zone II”, “Zone JJ”, “Zone KK”, “Zone LL”, “Zone MM” and “Zone QQ” collectively “Zones”; and 23 Street Lighting Zones (hereinafter “Street Lighting Zone 5", “Street Lighting Zone 7", “Street Lighting Zone 15", “Street Lighting Zone 17", “Street Lighting Zone 19", “Street Lighting Zone 39", “Street Lighting Zone 41", “Street Lighting Zone 62", “Street Lighting Zone 69", “Street Lighting Zone 86", “Street Lighting Zone 91", “Street Lighting Zone 93", “Street Lighting Zone 94", “Street Lighting Zone 102", “Street Lighting Zone 2-A", “Street Lighting Zone 2-B", “Street Lighting Zone 2-C", “Street Lighting Zone 2- D", “Street Lighting Zone 2 -E", “Street Lighting Zone 2 -F”, “Street Lighting Zone 2-G", “Street Lighting Zone 2-H” and “Street Lighting Zone 2-I”; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary that the City Council adopt a resolution pursuant to Section 22622 of the Streets and Highways Code, ordering the preparation and filing of an Engineer’s Report (hereinafter the “Report”) in accordance with Article 4 (commencing with Section 22565) of the Streets and Highways Code with regard to the assessments which are proposed to be levied Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
-2-
on assessable lots and parcels of land within Zones 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 173, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S T, U, W, X, Y, Z, AA, DD, EE, FF, GG, II, JJ, KK, LL, MM and QQ; and Street Lighting Zones 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2- A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E, 2-F, 2-G, 2-H and 2-I of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C for the 2024-25 fiscal year; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this action is statutorily exempt under CEQA guidelines Section 15273, as the funds from these assessments will be used for meeting operating expenses, purchasing supplies, materials or equipment, repair and maintenance and not for the extension of capital facilities.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Recitals. The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley does hereby find, determine and declare that the above recitals are true and correct.
Section 2. Improvements. The improvements authorized for Zones 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 141, 142, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, S, P, T, U, W, X, Y, Z, AA, GG and KK of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C are:
(a) The installation and planting of landscaping, including trees, shrubs, grass and other ornamental vegetation; and,
(b) The installation of irrigation and electrical facilities; and
(c) The maintenance or servicing of any of the foregoing.
In addition, Zone KK is authorized to provide the following:
(a) Maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right-of-ways including incidental costs and expenses;
(b) Maintenance and servicing of traffic signals within the public right-of-way including incidental costs and expenses.
In addition, Zone 4 is authorized to provide the following:
(c) Weed abatement and debris clean-up of multi-purpose trails;
(d) Maintenance, repair and/or replacement of multi-purpose trail lighting;
(e) Maintenance, repair and/or replacement of off-leash dog park facilities.
In addition, Zones 5 and 21 are authorized to provide the following:
(a) Weed abatement and debris clean-up of multi-purpose trails;
(b) Maintenance, repair and/or replacement of fencing.
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
-3-
In addition, Zones 14 and 16 are authorized to provide the following:
(a) Maintenance, repair and/or replacement of decorative and monument lighting;
In addition, Zone 141 is authorized to provide the following:
(a) Maintenance and servicing of bio- swales within the public right -of-way including the removal of petroleum hydrocarbons and other pollutants from water runoff.
(b) Maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right -of-ways including incidental costs and expenses.
In addition, Zone 142 is authorized to provide the following:
(a) Maintenance, repair and/or replacement of fossil filters within catch basins within the public right-of-way including incidental costs and expenses.
(b) Maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right -of-ways including incidental costs and expenses.
In addition, Zone A is authorized to provide the following:
(a) The maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right -of ways including incidental costs and expenses.
(b) The installation and planting of median landscaping, including trees, shrubs, grass and other ornamental vegetation; the installation if irrigation and electrical facilities; and the maintenance or servicing of any of the foregoing.
In addition, Zone C is authorized to provide the following:
(a) The maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right -of ways including incidental costs and expenses.
(b) The maintenance of trail along the boundary frontage per approved landscape plans.
In addition, Zones E, F, G, K, L, M, N, O, P, T, W, Y, AA, GG and KK are authorized to provide the following:
(a) The maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right -of ways including incidental costs and expenses
In addition, Zone I is authorized to provide the following:
(a) The maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right- of ways including incidental costs and expenses.
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
-4-
(b) The maintenance of trail along the boundary frontage per approved landscape plans.
(c) The maintenance of the landscape on the parkway along Etiwanda Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue, at the frontage of the commercial parcel.In addition, Zone S is authorized to provide the following:
(a) The maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right -of ways including incidental costs and expenses.
(b) The installation and planting of median landscaping, including trees, shrubs, grass and other ornamental vegetation; the installation if irrigation and electrical facilities; and the maintenance or servicing of any of the foregoing.
In addition, Zone U is authorized to provide the following:
(a) The maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right -of ways including incidental costs and expenses.
In addition, Zone X is authorized to provide the following:
(a) The maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right -of ways including incidental costs and expenses.
(b) The installation and planting of median landscaping on Cantu- Galleano Ranch Road, including trees, shrubs, grass and other ornamental vegetation; the installation if irrigation and electrical facilities; and the maintenance or servicing of any of the foregoing.
In addition, Zone Z is authorized to provide the following:
(a) The maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right- of ways including incidental costs and expenses.
(b) Maintenance and servicing of traffic signals within the public right-of-way including incidental costs and expenses.
Section 3. Improvements. The improvements authorized for Zones 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 126, 128, and 137 of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C are:
(a) Maintenance, repair and/or replacement of fossil filters within catch basins within the public right-of-way including incidental costs and expenses.
In addition Zones 78 and 137 are authorized to provide the following:
(a) The maintenance and servicing of traffic signals within the public right-of- way including incidental costs and expenses.
In addition Zone 137 is authorized to provide the following:
(a) The maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right-of-way including incidental costs and expenses.
Section 4. Improvements. The improvements authorized for Zones 106, 132, 173 and 182, and II of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C are:
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
-5-
(a) The maintenance and servicing of traffic signals within the public right-of- way including incidental costs and expenses.
(b) The maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right-of-way including incidental costs and expenses.
Section 5. Improvements. The improvements authorized for Street Lighting Zones 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E, 2-F, 2-G, Y, and W are:
(a) The maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right-of-way including incidental costs and expenses.
Section 6. Report. The City Engineer acting on behalf of the City, or his designee, is hereby designated Engineer (hereinafter the “Engineer”) and is ordered to prepare and file with the City Clerk the report with regard to the assessments proposed to be levied on assessable lots and parcels of land within Zones 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 173, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S, T, U, W, X, Z, AA, DD, EE, FF, GG, II and KK and Street Lightning Zones 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E, 2-F, 2-G and 2-H of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C to pay the costs of the maintenance and servicing of landscaping, multi-purpose trail, fencing, fossil filter, bio- swale, and traffic signal improvements; and the provision of electricity for streetlights, and traffic signals for the 2024-2025 fiscal year, pursuant to Sections 22565 through 22574 of the Streets and Highways Code.
Section 7. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
Section 8. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect from and after its date of adoption.
Section 9. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 5h day of June, 2025.
Brian Berkson
Mayor
ATTEST:
Evelyne Ssenkoloto,
Interim City Clerk
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
6-
CERTIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )
I, Evelyne Ssenkoloto, City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2025-53 was duly passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on the 5th day of June, 2025, by the following votes, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 5th day of June, 2025.
Evelyne Ssenkoloto,
Interim City Clerk
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
1-
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-54
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA
VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING INTENTION TO LEVY AND
COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN ZONES 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 173, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S, T, U, W, X, Y, Z; AA, DD, EE, FF, GG, II, JJ, KK, LL, MM, QQ AND STREET LIGHTING ZONES 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2- A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E, 2-F, 2-G, 2-H AND 2-I OF THE
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 89 -1-CONSOLIDATED OF THE
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND
LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 FOR THE MAINTENANCE AND SERVICING
OF LANDSCAPING, MULTI -PURPOSE TRAILS, FENCING, FOSSIL
FILTERS, BIO-SWALES, GRAFFITI ABATEMENT, TRAFFIC SIGNALS, BRIDGE LIGHTS, AND STREETLIGHTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 20 25-26 ;
AND GIVING NOTICE OF AND SETTING THE TIME AND PLACE OF
THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT AND
ORDERING NOTICE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING TO BE PUBLISHED
WHEREAS, the City Council (hereinafter the “City Council”) of the City of Jurupa Valley (hereinafter the “City”) has conducted proceedings for and has established the City of Jurupa Valley Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89-1- Consolidated of the County of Riverside, State of California (hereinafter "JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C") pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, which is Part 2 (commencing with Section 22500) of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code (hereinafter the "Streets and Highways Code"), for the installation and planting of landscaping; the installation of multi- purpose trails; the installation of fencing; the installation of fossil filters; the installation of irrigation or electrical facilities; and the maintenance and servicing of such landscaping, multi-purpose trails, fencing, fossil filters, bio-swales, irrigation or electrical facilities, streetlights, bridge lights and traffic signal improvements, including the provision of electricity for streetlights, bridge lights and traffic signals within the public rights-of- way; and graffiti abatement; and
WHEREAS, as ordered by the City Council, its Designee has filed with the City Clerk an Engineer’s Report (hereinafter the " Report " ) regarding the assessments to be levied and collected within 54 Zones (hereinafter “Zone 4", “Zone 5", “Zone 6", “Zone 7", “Zone 9", “Zone 14", “Zone 16", “Zone 17", “Zone 21", “Zone 34", “Zone 61", “Zone 73", “Zone 78", “Zone 95", “Zone 102", “Zone 106", “Zone 126", “Zone 128", “Zone 132", “Zone 137", “Zone 141", “Zone 142", “Zone 173", “Zone 182” , “Zone A” , “Zone C” , “Zone E” , “Zone F” , “Zone G” , “Zone I”, “Zone K”, ”Zone L”, “Zone M”, Zone N”, “Zone O”, “Zone P”, “Zone S”, “Zone T”, “Zone U”, “Zone W”, “Zone X”, “Zone Y”, “Zone Z”, “Zone AA”, “Zone DD”, “Zone EE”, “Zone FF”, “Zone GG”, “Zone II”, “Zone JJ”, “Zone KK”, “Zone LL”, “Zone MM” and “Zone QQ” collectively “Zones”; and 23 Street Lighting Zones (hereinafter “Street Lighting Zone 5", “Street Lighting Zone 7", “Street Lighting Zone 15", “Street Lighting Zone 17", “Street Lighting Zone 19", “Street Lighting Zone 39", “Street Lighting Zone 41", “Street Lighting Zone 62", “Street Lighting Zone 69", “Street Lighting Zone 86", “Street Lighting Zone 91", “Street Lighting Zone 93", “Street Lighting Zone 94", “Street Lighting Zone 102", “Street Lighting Zone 2-A", “Street Lighting Zone 2-B", “Street Lighting Zone 2- C", “Street Lighting Zone 2- D", “Street Lighting Zone 2- E", “Street Lighting Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
2-
Zone 2-F”, “Street Lighting Zone 2-G", “Street Lighting Zone 2-H” and “Street Lighting Zone 2- I”;and, (collectively “Street Lighting Zones”) of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C for fiscal year 2025-26 to pay the costs of maintenance services and improvements as identified in the preceding recital, and the Report has been presented to and considered by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the Report filed with the City Clerk states that the assessments to be levied in the respective Zones and Street Lighting Zones for fiscal year 2025-26 are in an amount that is the same as levied in fiscal year 2024-25, or increased by two percent ( 2%) or more than the assessments levied for fiscal year 2024-25 (based on the cumulative percentage increase in the CPI-U from March 2024 through March 2025), and are consistent with the terms of the ballot proposition approving the annexation of each zone; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary that the City Council adopt a resolution of intention pursuant to Section 22624 of the Streets and Highways Code, which fixes and gives notice, pursuant to Section 22626(a) of the Streets and Highways Code, of the time and place of a public hearing on said Report and the annual assessments for fiscal year;
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Recitals. The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley does hereby find, determine and declare that the above recitals are true and correct.
Section 2. Findings.
(a) The Report for Zones 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 173, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S, T, U, W, X, Z, AA, DD, EE, FF, GG, II, JJ, KK, LL, MM and QQ; and Street Lighting Zones 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E, 2-F, 2-G, 2-H and 2-I of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C contains all matters required by Section 22565 through 22574 of the Streets and Highways Code and may, therefore, be approved by the City Council; and
(b) The 2025-26 fiscal year assessment within each zone is:
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
3-
District Zone Assessed Units A ssessed Rate
JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C ZONE 4 EDUS 37. 59$
JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C ZONE 5 Parcels 58. 58$
JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C ZONE 6 Parcels 268. 17$
JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C ZONE 7 Acres 5. 85$
JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C ZONE 9 Parcels 51. 33$
JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C ZONE 14 EDUS 82. 29$
JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C ZONE 16 EDUS 81. 32$
JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C ZONE 17 Acres 753. 53$
JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C ZONE 21 Parcels 204. 14$
JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C ZONE 34 Parcels 124. 04$
JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C ZONE 61 Parcels 42. 69$
JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C ZONE 73 Parcels 53. 08$
JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C ZONE 78 Acres 681. 14$
JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C ZONE 95 Parcels 139. 47$
JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C ZONE 102 Parcels 24. 77$
JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C ZONE 106 Parcels 477. 89$
JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C ZONE 126 Acres 13. 39$
JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C ZONE 128 Parcels 36. 44$
JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C ZONE 132 Acres 2, 399.52$
JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C ZONE 137 Acres 397. 98$
JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C ZONE 141 Acres 858. 77$
JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C ZONE 142 EDUS 353. 75$
JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C ZONE 173 Acres 459. 97$
JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C ZONE 182 Parcels 3, 433.21$
JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C ZONE A Parcels 10, 681.39$
JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C ZONE C Parcels 2, 456.79$
JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C ZONE E Parcels 8, 443.98$
JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C ZONE F Parcels 1, 347.43$
JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C ZONE G Parcels 1, 034.28$
JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C ZONE I Parcels 1, 467.47$
JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C ZONE K Parcels 760. 40$
JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C ZONE L Parcels 3, 314.51$
JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C ZONE M Parcels 8, 231.27$
JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C ZONE N Parcels 2, 731.34$
JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C ZONE O Parcels 105. 28$
JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C ZONE P Parcels 5, 541.04$
JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C ZONE S Parcels 2, 049.36$
JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C ZONE T Parcels 2, 847.75$
JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C ZONE U Parcels 7, 021.09$
JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C ZONE W Parcels 553. 58$
JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C ZONE X Parcels 29, 493.27$
JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C ZONE Y Parcels 6, 987.96$
JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C ZONE Z Acres 692. 30$
JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C ZONE AA Parcels 10, 389.59$
JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C ZONE DD Acres 18, 059.97$
JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C ZONE EE Parcels 1, 785.00$
JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C ZONE FF Parcels 583. 80$
JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C ZONE GG EBU 1, 420.72$
JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C ZONE II Acres 2, 244.63$
JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C ZONE JJ EBU 1, 355.09$
JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C ZONE KK Acres 3, 478.68$
JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C ZONE LL EBU 348. 86$
JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C ZONE MM EBU 889. 82$
JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C ZONE QQ EBU 813. 63$
JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C STREET LIGHTING ZONE 5 Parcels 844. 08$ JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C STREET LIGHTING ZONE 7 Parcels 393. 17$ JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C STREET LIGHTING ZONE 15 Parcels 783. 37$ JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C STREET LIGHTING ZONE 17 Acres 204. 95$ JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C STREET LIGHTING ZONE 19 Parcels 423. 90$ JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C STREET LIGHTING ZONE 39 Acres 91. 36$ JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C STREET LIGHTING ZONE 41 Acres 1, 197.20$ JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C STREET LIGHTING ZONE 62 Acres 262. 23$ JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C STREET LIGHTING ZONE 69 Acres 95. 50$ JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C STREET LIGHTING ZONE 86 Acres 195. 92$ JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C STREET LIGHTING ZONE 91 Acres 1, 133.85$ JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C STREET LIGHTING ZONE 93 Acres 2, 047.96$ JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C STREET LIGHTING ZONE 94 Acres 395. 97$ JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C STREET LIGHTING ZONE 102 Acres 102. 18$ JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C STREET LIGHTING ZONE 2-A Parcels 296. 82$ JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C STREET LIGHTING ZONE 2-B Parcels 116. 64$ JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C STREET LIGHTING ZONE 2-C Parcels 42. 24$ JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C STREET LIGHTING ZONE 2-D Parcels 569. 38$ JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C STREET LIGHTING ZONE 2-E Parcels 161. 20$ JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C STREET LIGHTING ZONE 2-F Parcels 29. 98$ JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C STREET LIGHTING ZONE 2-G Acres 22. 61$ JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C STREET LIGHTING ZONE 2-H Parcels 404. 99$ JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C STREET LIGHTING ZONE 2-I Parcels 156. 00$ Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
4-
The Report proposes a two percent (2%) inflationary increase in the assessment per acre, per unit or per parcel as applicable in Zones 4, 5, 6, 7, 9 and 173 over the assessment levied for fiscal year 2023-24 and is consistent with ballot proposition approved by the qualified electors when establishing said zones. The Report proposes no inflationary increase in the assessment per acre, per unit or per parcel as applicable in Zones 61, 95, 102, 126, 128, 141, and 142 over the assessment levied for fiscal year 2023-24 and is consistent with ballot proposition approved by the qualified electors when establishing said zones. The Report proposes a 2.53% inflationary increase in the assessment per acre, per unit or per parcel as applicable in Zones 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S, T. U, W, X, Y, Z, AA, DD, EE, FF, GG and KK over the assessment levied for fiscal year 2024-25 and is consistent with ballot proposition approved by the qualified electors when establishing said zones.
Fiscal year 2025-2025 is the first year of assessment for Zone JJ, LL, MM, QQ and Street Lighting Zone 2-I, therefore, no inflationary increase is applied for the fiscal year 2025-2026 levy. The Report proposes 2.79% inflationary increase in the assessment per acre or per parcel as applicable in Street Lighting Zoes 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2- A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E, 2-F , 2-G and 2-H over the assessment levied for fiscal year 2024-25 and is consistent with ballot proposition approved by the qualified electors when establishing said zones.
Section 3. Intent. The City Council declares that it intends to levy assessments on all lots and parcels of assessable land within Zones 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 173, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S, T, U, W, X, Z, AA, DD, EE, FF, GG, II, JJ, KK, LL, MM and QQ; and Street Lighting Zones 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94,102, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E, 2-F, 2-G, 2-H and 2-I of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C. There are no parcels or lots within said zones that are owned by a federal or state governmental agency. There are four parcels or lots within said zones that are owned by the local agency (City of Jurupa Valley) and are not subject to special assessment. The assessments will be collected at the same time and in the same manner as property taxes are collected, and all laws providing for the collection and enforcement of property taxes shall apply to the collection and enforcement of the assessments.
Section 4. Description of Services and Improvements to be provided . The improvements authorized for Zones 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 141, 142, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, S, P, T, U, W, X, Y, Z, AA, GG, JJ, KK, LL, MM and QQ of JV L&LMD No. 89-1- C are:
(a) The installation and planting of landscaping, including trees, shrubs, grass and other ornamental vegetation; and,
(b) The installation of irrigation and electrical facilities; and
(c) The maintenance or servicing of any of the foregoing.
In addition, Zone KK and Zone LL are authorized to provide the following:
(a) Maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right -of-ways including incidental costs and expenses;
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
5-
In addition, Zone 4 is authorized to provide the following:
(a) Weed abatement and debris clean-up of multi-purpose trails;
(b) Maintenance, repair and/or replacement of multi-purpose trail lighting;
(c) Maintenance, repair and/or replacement of off-leash dog park facilities.
In addition, Zones 5, 21, JJ, MM and QQ are authorized to provide the following:
(a) Weed abatement and debris clean-up of multi-purpose trails;
(b) Maintenance, repair and/or replacement of fencing.
In addition, Zones 14 and 16 are authorized to provide the following:
(a) Maintenance, repair and/or replacement of decorative and monument lighting;
In addition, Zone 141 is authorized to provide the following:
(a) Maintenance and servicing of bio- swales within the public right -of-way including the removal of petroleum hydrocarbons and other pollutants from water runoff.
(b) Maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right -of-ways including incidental costs and expenses.
In addition, Zone 142 is authorized to provide the following:
(a) Maintenance, repair and/or replacement of fossil filters within catch basins within the public right-of-way including incidental costs and expenses.
(b) Maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right -of-ways including incidental costs and expenses.
In addition, Zone A is authorized to provide the following:
(a) The maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right -of ways including incidental costs and expenses.
(b) The installation and planting of median landscaping, including trees, shrubs, grass and other ornamental vegetation; the installation if irrigation and electrical facilities; and the maintenance or servicing of any of the foregoing.
In
addition, Zone C is authorized to provide the following:
(a) The maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right -of ways including incidental costs and expenses.
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
6-
(b) The maintenance of trail along the boundary frontage per approved landscape plans.
In addition, Zones E, F, G, K, L, M, N, O, P, T, W, Y, AA, GG and JJ are authorized to provide the following:
(a) The maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right -of ways including incidental costs and expenses
In addition, Zone I is authorized to provide the following:
(a) The maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right- of ways including incidental costs and expenses.
(b) The maintenance of trail along the boundary frontage per approved landscape plans.
(c) The maintenance of the landscape on the parkway along Etiwanda Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue, at the frontage of the commercial parcel.
In addition, Zone S are authorized to provide the following:
(a) The maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right -of ways including incidental costs and expenses.
(b) The installation and planting of median landscaping, including trees, shrubs, grass and other ornamental vegetation; the installation if irrigation and electrical facilities; and the maintenance or servicing of any of the foregoing.
In addition, Zone U is authorized to provide the following:
(a) The maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right -of ways including incidental costs and expenses.
In addition, Zone X is authorized to provide the following:
(a) The maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right -of ways including incidental costs and expenses.
(b) The installation and planting of median landscaping on Cantu- Galleano Ranch Road, including trees, shrubs, grass and other ornamental vegetation; the installation if irrigation and electrical facilities; and the maintenance or servicing of any of the foregoing.
In addition, Zone Z is authorized to provide the following:
(a) The maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right- of ways including incidental costs and expenses.
(b) Maintenance and servicing of traffic signals within the public right-of-way including incidental costs and expenses.
Section 5. Improvements. The improvements authorized for Zones 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 126, 128, and 137 of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C are:
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
7-
(a) Maintenance, repair and/or replacement of fossil filters within catch basins within the public right-of-way including incidental costs and expenses.
In addition Zones 78 and 137 are authorized to provide the following:
(a) Maintenance and servicing of traffic signals within the public right-of-way including incidental costs and expenses.
In addition Zone 137 is authorized to provide the following:
(a) Maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right-of- way including incidental costs and expenses.
Section 6. Improvements. The improvements authorized for Zones 106, 132, 173 and 182 of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C are:
(a) Maintenance and servicing of traffic signals within the public right-of-way including incidental costs and expenses.
(b) Maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right-of- way including incidental costs and expenses.
Section 7. Improvements. The improvements authorized for Street Lighting Zones 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E, 2-F, 2-G, 2-H, AA, DD, EE, FF, GG, II and KK are:
(a) Maintenance and servicing of streetlights within the public right-of- way including incidental costs and expenses.
Section 8. The District. The district is identified as “City of Jurupa Valley Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89-1- Consolidated of the County of Riverside, State of California”. The boundaries of 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 173, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S, T, U, W, X, Z, AA, DD, EE, FF, GG, II, JJ, KK, LL, MM and QQ; and Street Lighting Zones 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2- A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E, 2-F, 2-G, 2-H and 2-I, of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C are located within the City of Jurupa Valley and are described and shown in the Report.
Section 9. Report. The Report, which is on file with the City Clerk and which has been presented to the City Council, is hereby approved. Reference is made to the Report for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District, and any zones therein, and the annual assessments to be levied upon assessable lots and parcels within 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 173, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S, T, U, W, X, Z, AA, DD, EE, FF, GG, II, JJ, KK, LL, MM and QQ; and Street Lighting Zones 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2- A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E, 2-F, 2-G, 2-H and 2-I of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C.
Section 10. Public Hearing. A Public Hearing will be held on July 17, 2025 at 7:00 p.m.
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
8-
or thereafter, at the City of Jurupa Valley Council Chamber, 8930 Limonite Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509 regarding the Report and the proposed assessments to be levied for fiscal year 2020-21 within Zones 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 173, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S, T, U, X, Z, AA, DD, EE, FF, II, KK and Street Lightning Zones 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2- E, 2-F, 2-G and 2-H of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C.
Section 11. Information. Any property owner desiring additional information regarding 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 173, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S, T, U, X, Z, AA, DD, EE, FF, II, KK and Street Lightning Zones 5, 7, 15, 17, 19, 39, 41, 62, 69, 86, 91, 93, 94, 102, 2- A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E, 2- F, 2-G and 2-H of JV L&LMD No. 89-1-C., the Report, or the proposed assessments shall contact the City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley.
Section 12. Notice of the Public Hearing. Notices of the public hearing shall be given consistent with Section 22626(a) of the Streets and Highways Code. The notice of the public hearing shall be given by publication in an appropriate newspaper of a certified copy of this Resolution once at least ten (10) days prior to July 17 th, 2025. Said publication of this Resolution is
to be effected by the City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley.
Section 13. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
Section 14. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect from and after its date of adoption.
Section 15. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on this 5th day of June, 2024.
Brian Berkson
Mayor
ATTEST:
Evelyne Ssenkoloto,
Interim City Clerk
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
9-
CERTIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY )
I, Evelyne Ssenkoloto, City Clerk of the City of Jurupa Valley, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2025-54 was duly passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley on the 5th day of June, 2025 by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Jurupa Valley, California, this 5th day of June, 2025.
Evelyne Ssenkoloto
Interim City Clerk
City of Jurupa Valley
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.
89-1-CONSOLIDATED
ENGINEER’S REPORT VOLUME 1
FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026
ZONES 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 173, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S, T, U, W, X,
Y, Z, AA, DD, EE, FF, GG, II, JJ, KK, LL, MM, AND QQ
May 2025
PREPARED BY
Harris & Associates
600 B
Street, Suite 2000
San Diego, CA 92101
619
-
236
-
1778
www.weareharris.com
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
Engineer’s Report – Volume 1
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2025-2026
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Statement of Assessment Engineer .............................................................................................................................1 Backround .................................................................................................................................................................3 Part I – Plans and Specifications .................................................................................................................................4 A. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................................... 4 B. ASSESSMENT UNITS: .................................................................................................................................................. 5 C. DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS AND SERVICES .................................................................................................... 5 D. DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS PER ZONE ........................................................................................................... 6 E. MAINTENANCE PLANS ............................................................................................................................................. 12 Part II – Method of Apportionment .......................................................................................................................... 14 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................................. 14 SPECIAL BENEFIT ............................................................................................................................................................... 14 GENERAL BENEFIT ............................................................................................................................................................. 16 Part III – Estimate of Costs and Expenses .................................................................................................................. 17 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................................. 17 BUDGET SHEETS PER ZONE ............................................................................................................................................... 18 Part IV – Assessment Diagrams ................................................................................................................................. 19 Part V – Assessment Rolls ......................................................................................................................................... 20
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
Engineer’s Report – Volume 1
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2025-2026
1 STATEMENT OF ASSESSMENT ENGINEER
Statement of Assessment Engineer
AGENCY: CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY
PROJECT: CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.89-1-CONSOLIDATED (“CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY L&LMD NO.89-1-C”) – CITYWIDE
TO: CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY CITY COUNCIL
ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972,
DIVISION 15 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA This Engineer’s Report (“Report”) was prepared pursuant to the provisions 22565 through 22574 of the Landscape & Lighting Act of 1972, said act being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways and direction from the Jurupa Valley City Council of Riverside County. The Report describes the improvements which can be constructed, operated, maintained, and serviced by the District, and lists the maximum
The Jurupa Valley City Council, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, adopt Resolution No. 2016- 01 to initiate proceedings to form a special assessment district known and designated as:
Jurupa Valley Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89-1-Consolidated (“JV L&LMD No. 89-1- C” or “District”); and,
WHEREAS, the Jurupa Valley City Council did direct the appointed Engineer to make and file an annual Report, in accordance with Article 4 (commencing with Section 22565) of Chapter 1 of Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, being and article of the aforementioned Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972.
Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89-1-Consolidated (“L&LMD No. 89-1-C” or “District”); and,
WHEREAS, Section 22567 of said Article 4 states the Report shall consist of the following:
a. Plans for the improvements.
b. An estimate of the maintenance costs of the improvements. c. A diagram for the assessment district.
d. An assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance of the improvements.
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
Engineer’s Report – Volume 1
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2025-2026
2 I hereby assess and apportion the total amount of the costs and expenses upon several parcels of land within said designated area liable therefore and benefited thereby, in proportion to the estimated benefits that each parcel receives, respectively, from said services.
Therefore, I, the appointed Engineer, acting on behalf of the City of Jurupa Valley, pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer’s Report:
1. Pursuant to the provisions of law, the costs and expenses of the District have been assessed upon the parcels of land in the District benefited thereby in direct proportion and relation to the estimated benefits to be received by each of said parcels. For particulars as to the identifications
2. As required by law, a Diagram is filed herewith, showing the District, as well as the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within said District as the same exist each of which subdivisions of land or parcels or lots, respectively, have been given a separate number upon said Diagram and in the Assessment Roll contained herein.
3. The separate numbers given the subdivisions and parcels of land, as shown on said Assessment Diagram and Assessment Roll, correspond with the numbers assigned to each parcel by the Riverside County Assessor. Reference is made to the County Assessment Roll for a description of the lots or parcels.
4. As of the date of this report, there are no parcels or lots within Zones 4,5, 6,7, 9, 14, 16, 17, 21, 34, 61, 73, 78, 95, 102, 106, 126, 128, 132, 137, 141, 142, 173, 182, A, C, E, F, G, I, K, L, M, N, O, P, S, T, U, W, X, Y, Z, AA, DD, EE, FF, GG, II, JJ, KK, LL, MM, and QQ that are owned by a federal, state or other local governmental agency that will benefit from the services to be provided by the assessments to be collected.
5. As of the date of this report, there is one parcel within Zone 4 that is owned by the City of Jurupa Valley.
Parcel identified by Assessor Parcel Number 163-042-043 is the location of Jurupa Valley City Hall. Federal, State, and other local government agency’s owned lots do not benefit from the maintained improvements.
6. As of the date of this report, there are four parcels within Zone 16 that are owned by the City of Jurupa Valley. Parcels identified by Assessor Parcel Numbers 181-052-016, 181-052-017, 181-052-018, and 181- 052-004 correspond to the location of Jurupa Valley Operation Center. Federal, State, and other local government agency-owned lots do not benefit from the maintained improvements.
In conclusion,
DATED this 1st day of May, 2025.
Alison M. Bouley, P.E., Assessment Engineer
R.C.E. No. C61383
Engineer of Work
County of Riverside
State of California
Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025
Engineer’s Report – Volume 1
City of Jurupa Valley
LLMD No. 89-1-C
Fiscal Year 2025-2026
3 PART I – PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
Background
This combined Annual Engineer’s Report is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (“1972 Act”), which is Part 2, Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code.
Since the Passage of Proposition 218, Right to Vote on Taxes Act, which added Articles XIII (C) and XIII (D) to the California Constitution, new procedures must be followed to levy annual assessments under the 1972 Act. Proposition 218 requires that all annual assessments be supported by a detailed Engineer’s Report (“Report”) prepared by a registered professional engineer. The Report includes the information required by law.
The 1972 Act provides for the annual levy of assessments for the Jurupa Valley Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 89-1-C, for the express purpose of installing, maintaining, and servicing of the following:
Landscaping, including trees, shrubs, grass, or other ornamental vegetation; Statuary, fountains, and other ornamental structures;
Public lighting facilities, including traffic signals; Appurtenant facilities necessary for the maintenance or servicing thereof, including walls, sidewalks, and removal of debris; and
Maintenance and/or servicing of any of the foregoing, including the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste; and the cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti.
The cost associated with the installation, maintenance, and servicing of the improvements may be assessed against those properties which are specially benefited by the installation, maintenance, and servicing. A City may levy annual assessments for an assessment district after complying with the requirements of the 1972 Act, and the provisions in Proposition 218.
The City initiates proceedings for the annual levy of assessments by passing a resolution, which proposed the annual levy under the 1972 Act. This resolution also describes the improvements, describes the location of the District, and finally, orders an engineer, who is a registered professional engineer, certified by the State of California, to prepare and file a detailed report.
The Report prepared by the engineer must include maintenance plans for the improvements. The Report must also include an estimate of the costs of the improvements, a diagram, i.e., map of the District showing the boundary of the District, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the improvements against the parcels or lots which benefit from the improvements. Once the Report is completed, it is presented to the City Council for its review and approval as presented, or it may be modified and approved.
Once the Report is completed, it is presented to the City Council for its review and approval as presented, or it may be modified and approved. After preliminary approval of the Report, the City Council may adopt a Resolution of Intention, which declares its intent to levy the annual assessments against parcels within the existing District, describes the Regular City Council Meeting - June 5, 2025