Agenda packet, regular meeting — La Mesa City Council, June 14, 2022 (part 2 of 6)

Level 1
0' - 0"
Level 2
10' - 0"
Master - Roof
20' - 0"
3 A-302
4 A-302
21'-0"
20'-0" 1'-0"
8'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 1/2"11 1/2"
8'-10 1/4" 1'-1 3/4"
7'-0" 7'-0"

ELEVATION OF BUILDING PAD PER CIVIL

SLOPE OF ROOF PER SITE PLAN
304 304
304 304
B-11 B-10
B-8
B-5 Z-13
B-4 B-3
010
202
803

BASEMENT
-8' - 0"
18'-9 1/2" 11'-4" 11'-9"
8" 3'-0" 7'-0" 8"
NOTE:

LOCATION OF
OPTIONAL NONHABITABLE

STORAGE

BASEMENT
ACCESS
INT. SIZEL = 10'W =8'H = 7'
Level 1
0' - 0"
Level 2
10' - 0"
Master - Roof
20' - 0"
3 A-302
4 A-302
21'-0"
1'-0" 20'-0"
11 1/2" 1/2" 10'-0" 10'-0"
1'-1 3/4" 8'-10 1/4"
7'-0"

ELEVATION OF BUILDING PAD PER CIVIL

SLOPE OF ROOF PER SITE PLAN
B-5
B-7
B-10 B-11
B-4
BS
348
012
010
014
013
202
Level 1
0' - 0"
Level 2
10' - 0"
Master - Roof
20' - 0"
1 A-302
2 A-302
21'-0"
1'-0" 20'-0"
11 1/2" 1/2" 10'-0" 10'-0"
1'-0" 9'-0"
7'-0"

ELEVATION OF BUILDING PAD PER CIVIL

SLOPE OF ROOF PER SITE PLAN
304
304
803
010
B-6
B-5
013
Level 1
0' - 0"
Level 2
10' - 0"
Master - Roof
20' - 0"
1 A-302
2 A-302

ELEVATION OF BUILDING PAD PER CIVIL
21'-0"
1'-0" 20'-0"
11 1/2" 1/2" 10'-0" 10'-0" 8'-0"
1'-0" 9'-0"
7'-0"
7'-11 1/2"

SLOPE OF ROOF PER SITE PLAN
BT
BA
B-8
B-7 B-6
B-4
202
202

BASEMENT
-8' - 0"
9'-2" 9'-4"
8" 5'-0" 3'-0" 8"
NOTE:

LOCATION OF
OPTIONAL NONHABITABLE

STORAGE

BASEMENT
ACCESS
INT. SIZEL = 10'W =8'H = 7'
Drawn byReviewed by
1 D Project number
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:MEP:STRUCTURAL ENGINEER:Developer:

N.T.C. Development Inc.1380 El Cajon BLVD. Ste. 202El Cajon, CA 92020Phone: 619.593.2600 InDev + Design, INC © 2021 All Rights Reserved
Architect:

InDev+Design, Inc.2120 Columbia St.Suite 17 San Diego, CA 92101Phone: 858.231.9914 PROJECT ADDRESS:
8043 HIGH St.LA MESA, CA 91941

REVISIONS
Submittal DatePlan Date
TBD
DEC 2021
PROJECT STATUS:

CIVIL ENGINEER:VDLA Landscape Architects462 Stevens Ave. Suite 107 Solana Beach CA 92075Phone: 619.294.8484PLSA1911 San Diego Ave. Suite 100San Diego CA 92110Phone: 858.259.8212 CBA
2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
PROJECT NAME:

AJB

ZS / CG

CANTERA-KISHOUSE
PROJECT # B19-319-324
A-302
5/4/2022 1:58:57 PM

BUILDING BSECTIONS

CANTERA
3/8" = 1'-0" 1 BUILDING B SECTION 13/8" = 1'-0" 2 BUILDING B SECTION 2 3/8" = 1'-0" 3 BUILDING B SECTION 33/8" = 1'-0" 4 BUILDING B SECTION 4

KEYNOTES

NUMBER KEYNOTE
010 REFRIGERATOR012 RANGE WITH MICROWAVE ABOVE013 KITCHEN SINK014 MICROWAVE202 42" GLASS GUARDRAIL SYSTEM

KEYNOTES

NUMBER KEYNOTE
304 HVAC UNIT PER MECHANICAL348 TUB & SHOWER COMBO803 IKEA GODMORGON / ODENSVIK 40" SINK CABINET WHITE (191.854.66)

Page 156 of 615 ends

Level 1
0' - 0"
Level 2
10' - 0"
Master - Roof
20' - 0"
3 A-303
4 A-303
21'-0"
1'-0" 20'-0"
11 1/2" 1/2" 10'-0" 10'-0"
1'-1 3/4" 8'-10 1/4"
7'-0" 6'-8"

ELEVATION OF BUILDING PAD PER CIVIL

SLOPE OF ROOF PER SITE PLAN
304
304
C-13 C-8 C-12
C-4
C-3
348
347
803
008 012
Level 1
0' - 0"
Level 2
10' - 0"
Master - Roof
20' - 0"
3 A-303
4 A-303

ELEVATION OF BUILDING PAD PER CIVIL
21'-0"
1'-0" 20'-0"
11 1/2" 1/2" 10'-0" 10'-0" 8'-0"
1'-1 3/4" 8'-10 1/4"

SLOPE OF ROOF PER SITE PLAN
304
012
010
348
347
803 C-7 C-11
202

BASEMENT
-8' - 0"
15'-7" 11'-4" 5'-3 1/4"

ARTSHELF /BUILT IN SHELF
NOTE:

LOCATION OF
OPTIONAL NONHABITABLE

STORAGE

BASEMENT
ACCESS
INT. SIZEL = 10'W =8'H = 7'
Level 1
0' - 0"
Level 2
10' - 0"
Master - Roof
20' - 0"
1 A-303
2 A-303

ELEVATION OF BUILDING PAD PER CIVIL
21'-0"
20'-0" 1'-0"
10'-0" 10'-0" 1/2"11 1/2"
8'-10 1/4" 1'-1 3/4"
7'-0" 7'-0"

SLOPE OF ROOF PER SITE PLAN
304 304
304
304
C-12 C-11
C-4
C-1
CA
010
CB
Level 1
0' - 0"
Level 2
10' - 0"
Master - Roof
20' - 0"
1 A-303
2 A-303

ELEVATION OF BUILDING PAD PER CIVIL
21'-0"
1'-0" 20'-0"
11 1/2" 1/2" 10'-0" 10'-0" 8'-0"
1'-0" 9'-0"

SLOPE OF ROOF PER SITE PLAN
304
304
347
803
202

BASEMENT
-8' - 0"
5 3/4" 9'-4" 13'-4 1/2"
NOTE:

LOCATION OF
OPTIONAL NONHABITABLE

STORAGE

BASEMENT
ACCESS
INT. SIZEL = 10'W =8'H = 7'
Drawn byReviewed by
1 D Project number
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:MEP:STRUCTURAL ENGINEER:Developer:

N.T.C. Development Inc.1380 El Cajon BLVD. Ste. 202El Cajon, CA 92020Phone: 619.593.2600 InDev + Design, INC © 2021 All Rights Reserved
Architect:

InDev+Design, Inc.2120 Columbia St.Suite 17 San Diego, CA 92101Phone: 858.231.9914 PROJECT ADDRESS:
8043 HIGH St.LA MESA, CA 91941

REVISIONS
Submittal DatePlan Date
TBD
DEC 2021
PROJECT STATUS:

AJB

ZS / CG

CANTERA-KISHOUSE
PROJECT # B19-319-324
A-303
5/4/2022 1:59:05 PM

BUILDING CSECTIONS

CANTERA
3/8" = 1'-0" 1 BUILDING C SECTION 13/8" = 1'-0" 2 BUILDING C SECTION 2 3/8" = 1'-0" 3 BUILDING C SECTION 33/8" = 1'-0" 4 BUILDING C SECTION 4

KEYNOTES

NUMBER KEYNOTE
008 WASHING MACHINE010 REFRIGERATOR012 RANGE WITH MICROWAVE ABOVE202 42" GLASS GUARDRAIL SYSTEM304 HVAC UNIT PER MECHANICAL347 TOILET348 TUB & SHOWER COMBO803 IKEA GODMORGON / ODENSVIK 40" SINK CABINET WHITE (191.854.66)

Page 157 of 615 ends

PER SCHEDULE
WIDTH

PER SCHEDULE
HEIGHT

INTERIOR
DOOR

INTERIOR

DOUBLE DOOR

EXTERIOR
DOOR

EXTERIOR SLIDING

GLASS DOOR

INTERIOR

SLIDING DOOR
• INTERIOR DOOR• SINGLE FLUSH DOOR• FRAMING PER PLAN• STANDARD HARDWARE• WOOD SOLID CORE • INTERIOR DOOR• DOUBLE FLUSH DOOR• FRAMING PER PLAN• STANDARD HARDWARE• WOOD SOLID CORE • INTERIOR DOOR• 2 PANEL CLOSET SLIDING DOOR• FRAMING PER PLAN• STANDARD HARDWARE• WOOD HOLLOW CORE • EXTERIOR DOOR• METAL DOOR W/ GLAZING• FRAMING PER PLAN • STANARD HARDWARE• ALUMINUM SOLID CORE • EXTERIOR DOOR• 2 PANEL SLIDING GLASS DOOR• FRAMING PER PLAN• HARDWARE PER MANUFACTURER• ALUMINUM SERIES

FIXED WINDOW CASEMENT WINDOW
• FIXED PICTURE WINDOW• ALUMINUM FRAME• FRAMING PER PLAN• HARDWARE PER MANUFACTURER• ANODIZED BLACK/BRONZE • HINGED OPENING WINDOW• ALUMINUM FRAME • FRAMING PER PLAN• HARDWARE PER MANUFACTURER• ANODIZED BLACK/BRONZE

PER SCHEDULE
HEIGHT

PER SCHEDULE
WIDTH

PER SCHEDULE
HEIGHT
Drawn byReviewed by
1 A Project number
STRUCTURAL ENG:MEP:GENERAL CONTRACTOR:OWNER:

Contour Lofts LLC2605 State St. San Diego, CA 92103Phone: 858.231.9914 InDev + Design, INC © 2017 All Rights Reserved
InDev, Inc.2605 State St. San Diego, CA 92103Phone: 858.231.9914CSLB# 971403 Architect:

InDev+Design, Inc.2605 State St. San Diego, CA 92103Phone: 858.231.9914LIC# C18932 PROJECT ADDRESS:
2120 Columbia Street San Diego, CA 92101
Submittal DatePlan Date
08/29/201708/28/2017
PROJECT STATUS: BUILDING PERMIT SET
T-24 CONSULTANT:ENVISION ENGINEERING7734 Herchel Ave.La Jolla, CA 92037PHONE: 858.246.7745VANDER VEEN ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS42056 DELMONTE ST. TEMECULA, CA 92591PHONE: 951.795.5172VANDER VEEN ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS42056 DELMONTE ST. TEMECULA, CA 92591 B PHONE: 951.795.5172 CD
2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
PROJECT NAME:GEOTECHNICAL:CHRISTIAN WHEELER ENGINEERING3980 HOME AVE.SAN DIEGO, CA 92105PHONE: 619.550.1700 A-401
5/4/2022 1:59:09 PM

DOOR &WINDOWSCHEDULE
Author
Checker

CANTERA

CANTERA
Revision Schedule
Rev. # Revision Date

DOOR SCHEDULE
TAG

DOOR SIZE DOOR PANEL

MANUFACTURER

DOOR FRAME HARDWARE
GLAZING FIRE RATING COMMENTS WIDTH HEIGHT THK. TYPE MATERIAL FINISH ROUGH WIDTH ROUGH HEIGHT MATERIAL FINISH TYPE LOCK A-1 3' - 0" 8' - 0" 1 3/4" TIN CLAD STAINED 3' - 1 1/4" 8' - 1" METAL S.S., TIGHTLY SEALED SELF CLOSING TEMP. 20-MIN.A-2 4' - 8" 7' - 0" 1 3/4" DR-20 WOOD STAINED 5' - 2" 7' - 2" WOOD STAINED STANDARDA-3 2' - 6" 7' - 0" 2"A-4 2' - 6" 7' - 0" 2"A-5 2' - 6" 7' - 0" 2"A-6 2' - 6" 7' - 0" 2"A-7 2' - 6" 7' - 0" 2"A-8 2' - 6" 6' - 8" 2"A-9 2' - 8" 7' - 0" 2"B-1 3' - 0" 8' - 0" 1 3/4" TIN CLAD STAINED 3' - 1 1/4" 8' - 1" METAL S.S., TIGHTLY SEALED SELF CLOSING TEMP. 20-MIN.B-3 3' - 0" 7' - 0" 1 1/2" DR-13 WOOD STAINED 3' - 2" 7' - 2" WOOD STAINED STANDARD PER SPEC.B-4 2' - 6" 6' - 8" 2"B-5 2' - 6" 7' - 0" 2"B-6 2' - 6" 7' - 0" 2"B-7 2' - 6" 7' - 0" 2"B-8 5' - 11 1/2" 7' - 11 1/2" 1 3/4" DR-22 ALUMINUM ANODIZED BLACK Milgard Manufacturing 16' - 2" 8' - 2" ALUMINUM ANODIZED BLACK PER SPEC. PER SPEC. TEMP.B-9 2' - 6" 7' - 0" 2" B-10 2' - 6" 7' - 0" 2"B-11 2' - 6" 7' - 0" 2"B-12 3' - 0" 8' - 0" 1 3/4" TIN CLAD STAINED 3' - 1 1/4" 8' - 1" METAL S.S., TIGHTLY SEALED SELF CLOSING TEMP. 20-MIN.

B-13 5' - 11 1/2" 7' - 11 1/2" 1 3/4" DR-22 ALUMINUM ANODIZED BLACK Milgard Manufacturing 16' - 2" 8' - 2" ALUMINUM ANODIZED BLACK PER SPEC. PER SPEC. TEMP.

C-1 3' - 0" 8' - 0" 1 3/4" TIN CLAD STAINED 3' - 1 1/4" 8' - 1" METAL S.S., TIGHTLY SEALED SELF CLOSING TEMP. 20-MIN.

C-2 2' - 6" 6' - 8" 2"C-3 2' - 6" 7' - 0" 2"C-4 4' - 8" 7' - 0" 1 3/4" DR-20 WOOD STAINED 5' - 2" 7' - 2" WOOD STAINED STANDARDC-7 2' - 6" 6' - 8" 2"C-8 2' - 6" 6' - 8" 2"C-9 2' - 6" 6' - 8" 2" C-10 2' - 6" 6' - 8" 2"C-11 4' - 6" 7' - 0" 1 3/4" DR-23 WOOD STAINED 4' - 8" 7' - 2" WOOD STAINED STANDARDC-12 4' - 6" 7' - 0" 1 3/4" DR-23 WOOD STAINED 4' - 8" 7' - 2" WOOD STAINED STANDARDC-13 4' - 6" 7' - 0" 1 3/4" DR-23 WOOD STAINED 4' - 8" 7' - 2" WOOD STAINED STANDARD

DOOR SCHEDULE NOTES

1. ALL EMERGENCY ESCAPE AND RESCUE OPENINGS SHALL COMPLY WITHTHE FOLLOWING: THE MINIMUM NET CLEAR OPENING HEIGHT FIMENSIONS SHALL BE 24 INCHES, THE MINIMUM NET CLEAR OPENING WIDTH DIMENSION SHALL BE 20 INCHES, THE NET CLEAR OPENING DIMENSIONS REQUIRED SHALL BE OBTAINED BY THE NORMAL OPERATION OF THE EMERGENCY ESCAPE AND RESCUE OPENING FROM INSIDE OF THE BUILDING. ALL WINDOWS MUST MEET THIS REQUIREMENT WHEN APPLICABLE.

2. ALL EGRESS DOORS SHALL BE SIDE HINGED, AND SHALL PROVIDE THE MINIMUM CLEAR WIDTH OF 32 INCHES, WHEN MEASURED BETWEEN THE FACE OF THE DOOR AND THE STOP, WITH THE DOOR OPEN 90 DEGREES. THE MINIMUM HEIGHT OF THE DOOR OPENING SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 78 INCHES IN HEIGHT, MEASURED FROM THE TOP OF THE THRESHOLD TO THE BOTTOM OF THE STOP.

3. ALL GLASS THAT IS IN A "HAZARDOUS LOCATION" ACCORDING TO THE IRC R308.4 SHALL BE TEMPERED GLASS.4. OWNER TO VERIFY ALL FINISHES.5. MINIMUM STC RATING OF 30 FOR ALL EXTERIOR DOORS (EXCEPT GARAGE DOOR). 1/2" = 1'-0"

DOOR TYPES
1/2" = 1'-0"

WINDOW TYPES

WINDOW SCHEDULE
TAG Type
Mark
STYLE

WINDOW SIZE
GLAZING FRAME MATERIAL FINISH MANUFACTURER COMMENTS LEVEL WIDTH HEIGHT SILL ABOVE F.F.

AA A2 FIXED 5' - 0" 4' - 0" 4' - 0" Milgard Manufacturing Level 1AB A11 FIXED 5' - 0" 3' - 0" 0' - 0" Milgard Manufacturing Level 1 AC A9 FIXED 5' - 0" 5' - 0" 3' - 0" Milgard Manufacturing Level 1AD A14 FIXED 3' - 0" 3' - 0" 0' - 0" Milgard Manufacturing Level 1 AE A13 CASEMENT 3' - 0" 5' - 0" 3' - 0" ALUMINUM ANODIZED BLACK Milgard Manufacturing Level 1 AF A12 FIXED 2' - 6" 3' - 0" 0' - 0" Milgard Manufacturing Level 1 AG A8 CASEMENT 2' - 6" 5' - 0" 3' - 0" ALUMINUM ANODIZED BLACK Milgard Manufacturing Level 1 AH A14 FIXED 3' - 0" 3' - 0" 0' - 0" Milgard Manufacturing Level 2 AI A13 CASEMENT 3' - 0" 5' - 0" 3' - 0" ALUMINUM ANODIZED BLACK Milgard Manufacturing Level 2 AJ A11 FIXED 5' - 0" 3' - 0" 0' - 0" Milgard Manufacturing Level 2 AK A9 FIXED 5' - 0" 5' - 0" 3' - 0" Milgard Manufacturing Level 2 AL A11 FIXED 5' - 0" 3' - 0" 0' - 0" Milgard Manufacturing Level 2 AM A9 FIXED 5' - 0" 5' - 0" 3' - 0" Milgard Manufacturing Level 2 AN A14 FIXED 3' - 0" 3' - 0" 0' - 0" Milgard Manufacturing Level 2 AO A13 CASEMENT 3' - 0" 5' - 0" 3' - 0" ALUMINUM ANODIZED BLACK Milgard Manufacturing Level 2 AP A12 FIXED 2' - 6" 3' - 0" 0' - 0" Milgard Manufacturing Level 2 AQ A8 CASEMENT 2' - 6" 5' - 0" 3' - 0" ALUMINUM ANODIZED BLACK Milgard Manufacturing Level 2 BA A12 FIXED 2' - 6" 3' - 0" 0' - 0" Milgard Manufacturing Level 1 BB A8 CASEMENT 2' - 6" 5' - 0" 3' - 0" ALUMINUM ANODIZED BLACK Milgard Manufacturing Level 1 BC A12 FIXED 2' - 6" 3' - 0" 0' - 0" Milgard Manufacturing Level 1BD A8 CASEMENT 2' - 6" 5' - 0" 3' - 0" ALUMINUM ANODIZED BLACK Milgard Manufacturing Level 1 BE A14 FIXED 3' - 0" 3' - 0" 0' - 0" Milgard Manufacturing Level 1 BF A16 FIXED 3' - 0" 5' - 0" 3' - 0" Milgard Manufacturing Level 1 BG A14 FIXED 3' - 0" 3' - 0" 0' - 0" Milgard Manufacturing Level 1 BH A13 CASEMENT 3' - 0" 5' - 0" 3' - 0" ALUMINUM ANODIZED BLACK Milgard Manufacturing Level 1 BI A14 FIXED 3' - 0" 3' - 0" 0' - 0" Milgard Manufacturing Level 1 BJ 21 FIXED 6' - 0" 8' - 0" 0' - 0" Milgard Manufacturing Level 1BJ A16 FIXED 3' - 0" 5' - 0" 3' - 0" Milgard Manufacturing Level 1 BK A14 FIXED 3' - 0" 3' - 0" 0' - 0" Milgard Manufacturing Level 1 BL A13 CASEMENT 3' - 0" 5' - 0" 3' - 0" ALUMINUM ANODIZED BLACK Milgard Manufacturing Level 1 BM A12 FIXED 2' - 6" 3' - 0" 0' - 0" Milgard Manufacturing Level 1 BN A8 CASEMENT 2' - 6" 5' - 0" 3' - 0" ALUMINUM ANODIZED BLACK Milgard Manufacturing Level 1 BO A14 FIXED 3' - 0" 3' - 0" 0' - 0" Milgard Manufacturing Level 2 BP A16 FIXED 3' - 0" 5' - 0" 3' - 0" Milgard Manufacturing Level 2 BQ A14 FIXED 3' - 0" 3' - 0" 0' - 0" Milgard Manufacturing Level 2 BR A13 CASEMENT 3' - 0" 5' - 0" 3' - 0" ALUMINUM ANODIZED BLACK Milgard Manufacturing Level 2 BS A8 CASEMENT 2' - 6" 5' - 0" 3' - 0" ALUMINUM ANODIZED BLACK Milgard Manufacturing Level 2 BT 26 FIXED 6' - 0" 8' - 0" 0' - 0" Milgard Manufacturing Level 2 BU A8 CASEMENT 2' - 6" 5' - 0" 3' - 0" ALUMINUM ANODIZED BLACK Milgard Manufacturing Level 2 BV A14 FIXED 3' - 0" 3' - 0" 0' - 0" Milgard Manufacturing Level 2 BW A13 CASEMENT 3' - 0" 5' - 0" 3' - 0" ALUMINUM ANODIZED BLACK Milgard Manufacturing Level 2 BX A14 FIXED 3' - 0" 3' - 0" 0' - 0" Milgard Manufacturing Level 2 BY A16 FIXED 3' - 0" 5' - 0" 3' - 0" Milgard Manufacturing Level 2 CA A14 FIXED 3' - 0" 3' - 0" 0' - 0" Milgard Manufacturing Level 1CB A13 CASEMENT 3' - 0" 5' - 0" 3' - 0" ALUMINUM ANODIZED BLACK Milgard Manufacturing Level 1 CC A14 FIXED 3' - 0" 3' - 0" 0' - 0" Milgard Manufacturing Level 1 CD A13 CASEMENT 3' - 0" 5' - 0" 3' - 0" ALUMINUM ANODIZED BLACK Milgard Manufacturing Level 1 CE A14 FIXED 3' - 0" 3' - 0" 0' - 0" Milgard Manufacturing Level 1 CF A16 FIXED 3' - 0" 5' - 0" 3' - 0" Milgard Manufacturing Level 1 CG A14 FIXED 3' - 0" 3' - 0" 0' - 0" Milgard Manufacturing Level 1 CH A16 FIXED 3' - 0" 5' - 0" 3' - 0" Milgard Manufacturing Level 1 CI A14 FIXED 3' - 0" 3' - 0" 0' - 0" Milgard Manufacturing Level 1 CJ A13 CASEMENT 3' - 0" 5' - 0" 3' - 0" ALUMINUM ANODIZED BLACK Milgard Manufacturing Level 1 CK A12 FIXED 2' - 6" 3' - 0" 0' - 0" Milgard Manufacturing Level 2 CL A8 CASEMENT 2' - 6" 5' - 0" 3' - 0" ALUMINUM ANODIZED BLACK Milgard Manufacturing Level 2 CM A12 FIXED 2' - 6" 3' - 0" 0' - 0" Milgard Manufacturing Level 2 CN A8 CASEMENT 2' - 6" 5' - 0" 3' - 0" ALUMINUM ANODIZED BLACK Milgard Manufacturing Level 2 CO A14 FIXED 3' - 0" 3' - 0" 0' - 0" Milgard Manufacturing Level 2 CP A13 CASEMENT 3' - 0" 5' - 0" 3' - 0" ALUMINUM ANODIZED BLACK Milgard Manufacturing Level 2 CQ A14 FIXED 3' - 0" 3' - 0" 0' - 0" Milgard Manufacturing Level 2 CR A16 FIXED 3' - 0" 5' - 0" 3' - 0" Milgard Manufacturing Level 2 CS A14 FIXED 3' - 0" 3' - 0" 0' - 0" Milgard Manufacturing Level 2 CT A16 FIXED 3' - 0" 5' - 0" 3' - 0" Milgard Manufacturing Level 2 CU A14 FIXED 3' - 0" 3' - 0" 0' - 0" Milgard Manufacturing Level 2 CV A13 CASEMENT 3' - 0" 5' - 0" 3' - 0" ALUMINUM ANODIZED BLACK Milgard Manufacturing Level 2

WINDOW SCHEDULE NOTES

1. ALL GLASS THAT IS IN A "HAZARDOUS LOCATION" ACCORDING TO 2016 CBC SECTION 2406.3 SHALL BE TEMPERED GLASS.

2. OWNER TO VERIFY ALL MATERIALS AND FINISHES3. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL SIZES AND DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO ORDERING AND INSTALLING.4. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL SIZES AND DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO ANY CUSTOM BUILT FEATURES.5. MIN. STC = 30 6 SKYLIGHTS: VELUX TYP. ESR-4108

Page 158 of 615 ends

CMU WALL PER STRUCTURAL
3/8" STEEL BACKING RODWATER-PROOF SEALANT
FLOOR ASSEMBLY PER PLANSMAINTAIN FIRE RATING AS REQUIREDFINISH MATERIAL PER PLANS3 5/8" 20 GA. METAL STUDS @ 16" O.C.

METAL CHANNEL LEDGER
2X BLOCKING

ON METAL

STUD WALLS

WALL PER PLAN

MAINTAIN FIRE RATING

AS REQUIRED
x2 #2 SHEET METAL SCREWS OR CONCRETE LAG SCREWSCABINETRY PER PLANMETAL CHANNEL LEDGER x2 #8 SHEET METAL SCREWSESR-2269 HILT SHOT PIN @ 16" o.c.

VARIES IN FIELD

FLOOR ASSEMBLY PER PLANSMAINTAIN FIRE RATING AS REQUIRED 5/8" DRYWALL

AROUND SOFFIT

METAL CHANNEL LEDGER

BLOCKING ON

METAL STUD
WALLS

MAINTAIN FIRE RATING

AS REQUIRED

WALL FINISH

PER PLAN
x2 #2 SHEET METAL SCREWS OR CONCRETE LAG SCREWS
3 5/8" 20 GA. METAL STUDS @ 16" O.C.x2 #8 SHEET METAL SCREWSMETAL CHANNEL LEDGERESR-2269 HILT SHOT PIN @ 16" o.c.

FINISH MATERIAL PER PLANSHEATHING PER STRUCTURALCMU WALL PER PLANMETAL EDGE TRIM

SLAB DEPTH PER PLAN
2"
1/2"
WATER PROOF MEMBRANETILE OR FINISH PER PLANRECESSED AREA TO BE BUILT UP WITH CRICKET ASSEMBLY TO SLOPE TO DRAINSHOWER GLASS CAULK AND SEAL EDGESSEE SHEET S3.3 DETAIL #11 FOR STEPPED SLAB CONDITIONMORTAR BED NEWTECH WOOD PLANKAW-08 CLIP1x VERTICAL WOOD STRIPSBUILDING PAPER / VAPOR BARRIERAW-02 STATER/BASE CLIPRAINSCREEN SIDING SYSTEM -

PLY-WOOD BACKINGWALL PER PLANFOUNDATION PER PLANFLOOR PER PLANINTERIOR

EXTERIOR

WALL FINISH PER PLANSHEARING PER STRUCTURAL
NEWTECH WOOD PLANKAW-08 CLIP1x VERTICAL WOOD STRIPSBUILDING PAPER / VAPOR BARRIERAW-02 STATER/BASE CLIP

DOUBLE STUD WALL PER PLAN
2ND FLOOR

INTERIOR

EXTERIOR

WALL FINISH PER PLANSHEATHING PER STRUCTURAL
1ST FLOOR

INTERIOR

DOUBLE STUD TOP PLATEDOUBLE STUD WALL PER PLAN
PLY-WOOD BACKINGAW-08 CLIPT-7 SPACERNEWTECH WOOD PLANK1x VERTICAL WOOD STRIPSBUILDING PAPER / VAPOR BARRIERPLY-WOOD BACKING

DOUBLE STUD WALL PER PLANFLOOR FINISH PER PLANWALL FINISH PER PLANCEILING FINISH PER PLAN (2) LAYERS OF 3/4" PLY WOOD(2) LAYERS OF 3/4" PLY WOODBLACK ANODIZED ALUMINUM SHEATING BUILDING PAPER / VAPOR BARRIERBLACK ANODIZED ALUMINUM SHEATING NEWTECH WOOD PLANKAW-08 CLIP1x VERTICAL WOOD STRIPSBUILDING PAPER / VAPOR BARRIER CANT

ROOFTOP

EXTERIOR

ROOF SHEATHING PER STRUCTURALBUILT-UP ROOF
2ND FLOOR

INTERIOR

DOUBLE STUD TOP PLATE

DOUBLE STUD WALL PER PLANPLY-WOOD BACKING

TJI PER STRUCTURALCAP FLASHING
AW-08 CLIPAW-08 CLIPAW-08 CLIPT-7 SPACER

CEILING FINISH PER PLANSHEATHING PER STRUCTURAL
NEWTECH WOOD PLANKAW-08 CLIP1x VERTICAL WOOD STRIPSBUILDING PAPER / VAPOR BARRIER

EXTERIOR

WALL FINISH PER PLANSHEATHING PER STRUCTURAL

INTERIOR

DOUBLE STUD WALL PER PLAN

PLY-WOOD BACKING

STUDS PER STRUCTURAL
US46 OUTER CORNER CLIP 1x VERTICAL WOOD STRIPSAW-08 CLIP NEWTECH WOOD PLANK(x2) LAYERS 3/4" PLYWOOD 7/8" HAT CHANNELBUILDING PAPER / VAPOR BARRIER

EXTERIOR

WALL FINISH PER PLANSHEATHING PER STRUCTURAL

INTERIOR

DOUBLE STUD WALL PER PLAN

PLY-WOOD BACKING

STUDS PER STRUCTURAL
1x VERTICAL WOOD STRIPSAW-08 CLIP

SINGLE STUD WALL PER PLAN
AW-08 CLIP

SHEATHING PER STRUCTURAL

BLACK ANODIZED ALUMINUM SHEATINGBLACK ANODIZED ALUMINUM SHEATING 7/8" HAT CHANNELBUILDING PAPER / VAPOR BARRIER

EXTERIOR

WALL FINISH PER PLANDOUBLE STUD TOP PLATE

INTERIOR

SHEATHING PER STRUCTURAL

BLACK ANODIZED ALUMINUM SHEATING WALL FINISH PER

PLANSINGLE STUD WALL PER PLANWINDOW HEADER PER STRUCTURAL 7/8" HAT CHANNELBUILDING PAPER / VAPOR BARRIERBLACK ANODIZED ALUMINUM SHEATING

SHEATHING PER STRUCTURAL
MILGARD STANDARD ALUMINUM WINDOW FRAME WITH 1" FLANGEMILGARD STANDARD ALUMINUM WINDOW FRAME WITH 1" FLANGEWINDOW PER SCHEDULE

HEADSILL/JAMB
7/8" HAT CHANNELBUILDING PAPER / VAPOR BARRIER

EXTERIOR INTERIOR

SHEATHING PER STRUCTURAL

BLACK ANODIZED ALUMINUM SHEATING WALL FINISH PER

PLANDOOR HEADER PER STRUCTURAL
7/8" FURRING STRIPTIMELY ADJUSTABLE FRAME
20 3" = 1'-0" CMU WALL CONTROL JOINT1
5 1" = 1'-0" SOFFIT @ CABINETS1
Drawn byReviewed by
1 D Project number
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:MEP:STRUCTURAL ENGINEER:Developer:

N.T.C. Development Inc.1380 El Cajon BLVD. Ste. 202El Cajon, CA 92020Phone: 619.593.2600 InDev + Design, INC © 2021 All Rights Reserved
Architect:

InDev+Design, Inc.2120 Columbia St.Suite 17 San Diego, CA 92101Phone: 858.231.9914 PROJECT ADDRESS:
8043 HIGH St.LA MESA, CA 91941

REVISIONS
Submittal DatePlan Date
TBD
DEC 2021
PROJECT STATUS:

AJB

ZS / CG

CANTERA-KISHOUSE
PROJECT # B19-319-324
AD-101
5/4/2022 1:59:14 PM

TYPICALDETAILS

CANTERA
10 1" = 1'-0" SOFFIT1
19 3" = 1'-0" CMU TRANSITION TO FINISH MATERIAL1
15 3" = 1'-0" RECESSED SHOWER STALL
18 3" = 1'-0" BASE CONDITION (SECTION)13 3" = 1'-0" HORIZONTAL BREAK (SECTION) 3 3" = 1'-0" PARAPET (SECTION)
17 3" = 1'-0" CORNER DETAIL (PLAN)12 3" = 1'-0" WALL INSET (PLAN) 14 3" = 1'-0" WINDOW (SECTION) 4 3" = 1'-0" DOOR (SECTION)

Page 159 of 615 ends

WALL ASSEMBLY PER PLANS
SILICONE SEALANT INSTALLED TO 5/8" DEPTH AND FLUSH WITH SURFACE OF WALL.MAX 6"ø NO. 28 HVAC STEEL DUCT OR MAX. 4" STEEL, IRON PIPE, CONDUIT, EMT COPPER PIPE OR TUBING, AND FIRE SPINKLER PIPES.INSTALL A 3/8" THICK COVER BEAD AT DUCT OR PIPE PENETRATION.UL RATING: ASTEM EU14 (UL 1479) REFER TO SYSTEM WL-7019 A
A

SECTION A-A
NON-METALLIC PENETRANT CABLESADDITIONAL FILL MATERIAL INSTALLED WITH A MIN 1/4" CROWN IS FORMED AROUND THROUGH PENETRANTION AT CONTACT POINT OF CABLE OR CONDUIT.FLOOR ASSEMBLY PER PLANMAX 54% OF OPENING FILLED W/ CABLEUL LISTED FIRE RATED SEALANT TO MATCH RATING OF ASSEMBLY. 5/8" MIN. DEPTH OF FILL TO BE FLUSH WITH FINISH SURFACE.NOTE: REFER TO SYSTEM FC-3057 UL RATING: ASTM E814 (UL 1479) REFER TO SYSTEM FC-01010ADDITIONAL FILL MATERIAL INSTALLED WITH A MIN 1/4" CROWN IS FORMED AROUND PENETRATION AT CONTACT POINT TO CABLE OR CONDUITUL LISTED FIRE RATED SEALANT -MATCH RATING OF ASSEMBLY. 3/4" MIN. DEPTH OF FILL MATERIAL FLUSH WITH TOP OF SURFACE.UL LISTED FIRE RATED SEALANT -MATCH RATING OF ASSEMBLY. 5/8" MIN DEPTH OF FILL MATERIAL FLUSH WITH SURFACE OF CEILING.MAX 4" STEEL, IRON PIPE, CONDUIT, EMT COPPER PIPE OR TUBING, AND FIRE SPINKLER PIPES W/ METAL ESCUTCHEON. UL 199.RATED CEILING ASSEMBLY PER PLANSFRAMING PER STRUCTURALFLOOR ASSEMBLY PER PLANS FACE NAIL (MIN. OF 2 NAILS PER SIDE) AT THE FLASHING ON EACH SIDE OF POST.FLASHING IS SECURED TO SUBFLOOR WITH NAILS ON ALL SIDES.

GALVANIZED, 26 GAUGE,

FLAT METAL INSTALLED

ON ALL CORNERS OF

THE POST AND NAILED
TO THE SUBSTRATE.

APPLY MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDED JOINT SEALANT BEHIND FLASHING AND AT TOP OF THE FLASHINGAPPLY MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDED JOINT SEALANT AFTER COMPLETION OF THE PLI-DEK BASECOAT AROUND BASE OF POST. PLI-DEK SYSTEM TERMINATES ATTHIS POINT GS88 TO BE COATED ON ALL VERTICAL FLASHING.

POST PER PLAN

BLK'G PER

STRUCUTRAL

ASSEMBLY

PER PLANS

POST CONNECTION

PER STRUCTURAL
26 GA. BONDERIZED 2-PIECE SHEET METAL SADDLE MIN. 4" OVER LAP, FULLY BEDDED IN SEALANT. ALL 4 SIDES OF POST TO BE FLASHED.SEALANT NOTCH POST 1/2" DEEP @ 3" ABOVE DECK SHEATHING AROUND PERIMETER OF POST.JIFFY SEAL BETWEEN FLASHING AND SUBSTRATEWATER PROOF DECKING SYSTEM PER PLAN.

GENERAL FLASHING INSTALLATION NOTES:A. ATTACH FLASHING ALONG THE BOTTOM OF ROUGH OPENING WITH THE BOTTOM LEFT FREE TO ALLOW "TYVEK" TO BE SLIPPED UNDERNEATH.

B. ATTACH JAMB FLASHING ALONG SIDE OF OPENING ALIGNING FLUSH TO EDGE OF ROUGH OPENING.C. BEFORE INSTALLING WINDOW, APPLY CONTINUOUS BEAD OF SEALANT TO THE BACKSIDE OF FRAME FLANGE NEAR THE OUTER EDGE TO CREATE A CONTINUOUS SEAL BETWEEN THE WINDOW AND THE FLASHING.

D. INSTALL THE WINDOW PER MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS. APPLY A CONTINUOUS BEAD OF SEALANT AT THE TOP OF THE FRAME FLANGE EXTERIOR FACE.

E. APPLY HEAD FLASHING ENSURING FULL CONTACT TO THE HEAD SEALANT, DO NOT NAIL THROUGH THE

FRAME FLANGE FOR ATTACHMENT TO ALLOW POTENTIAL HEADER DEFLECTION AND FREE MOVEMENT FOR THE FRAME.
2" MIN. 2" MIN. EXTEND FLASHING 2" MIN. BEYOND FLASHING TYP.

GLAZING OR DOOR OPENINGGLAZING OR DOOR FRAMEFRAME FLANGEW.R. MEADOWS "AIRSHIELD (40 MIL.) " 9" WIDE FLASHINGFLASHING BENEATH "TYVEK" BUILDING WRAP."TYVEK" BUILDING WRAPNAILING BBAA

SECTION A-A
HEADER

SECTION B-B

DOOR SILL

SECTION B-B
SILL

BOTH SIDES
6" MIN.

JIFFY SEAL (WRAP 3 SIDES 6" MIN.)
TYVEK
CAULK

FLASHING

TAPE (CONTINUOUS)
CAULK

SILL PAN FLASHING (WHERE OCCURS)
CAULK

TYVEK BUILDING WRAP (WRAP ONTO SILL)
JIFFY SEAL (WRAP 3 SIDES 6" MIN.)JIFFY SEAL (WRAP 3 SIDES 6" MIN.)

TYVEK BUILDING WRAP (WRAP ONTO SILL)
'J' MOLDING
SOUND DAMPER TO RUN ALONG ENTIRE TOP OF AIR DUCT ENCLOSURETWO (2) LAYERS OF 5/8" TYP. 'X' GYPSUM BOARD ASSEMBLY AROUND DUCTS.TYP. AIR DUCT FROM DRYER,RANGE, HOOD VENT, OR BATHROOM FANS PER PLAN. FILL SURROUND SPACE WITH INSULATION.2X BLOCKING TYPICAL AT ALL FIXTURE AND DUCT ENCLOSURES.RECESSED LIGHT FIXTURE OR BATHROOM FAN IN CEILING PER ELECTRICAL PLAN.TWO (2) LAYERS OF 5/8" TYP. 'X' GYPSUM BOARD AROUND FULL PERMITER OF RECESSED FIXTURE

18. GA. WIRE TIE RETAINERJOINT COMPOUND APPLIED TO BACK OF DRYWALLCONTINUOUS LAYER OF 5/8" TYP 'X' GYPSUM BOARD TO MAINTAIN ASSEMBLY RATING.TYPE 'G' SCREW, ONE PER CORNERCONDUIT PER PLANNOTE: CUT ALL "ENCLOUSURE PIECES OF GYPSUM PANEL TO INSURE PROPER, TIGHT FIT.

USG# 09 21 16.328
15 3" = 1'-0" TYPICAL WALL PENETRATIONS110 3" = 1'-0" TYPICAL WIRE PENETRATIONS1 20 3" = 1'-0" TYPICAL FLOOR/CEILING PENETRATIONS1
Drawn byReviewed by
1 D Project number
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:MEP:STRUCTURAL ENGINEER:Developer:

N.T.C. Development Inc.1380 El Cajon BLVD. Ste. 202El Cajon, CA 92020Phone: 619.593.2600 InDev + Design, INC © 2021 All Rights Reserved
Architect:

InDev+Design, Inc.2120 Columbia St.Suite 17 San Diego, CA 92101Phone: 858.231.9914 PROJECT ADDRESS:
8043 HIGH St.LA MESA, CA 91941

REVISIONS
Submittal DatePlan Date
TBD
DEC 2021
PROJECT STATUS:

AJB

ZS / CG

CANTERA-KISHOUSE
PROJECT # B19-319-324
AD-102
5/4/2022 1:59:17 PM

PENETRATIONDETAILS

CANTERA
14 3" = 1'-0" POST FLASHING1
9 NTS OPEN FLASHING1
5 1 1/2" = 1'-0" LIGHTBOX ENCLOSURE1
19 3" = 1'-0" 1 HR. BOX ENCLOSURE1 18 NTS 3 HR PENETRATION

Page 160 of 615 ends

AD-103
10 Sim
---
-
Sim
AD-103
19 Sim
WALL PER PLANFRAMING PER STRUCTURALPLYWOOD SHEATHING PER STRUCUTRAL W/ MAX. 1/8" GAP BETWEEN SHEETS.FLASHING PAPER TO COVER PLYWOOD SEAMS 2" MAX. 6" MIN. 3/4"
2"
OFFSET METAL LATH EDGES FROM PLYWOOD SEAMS MIN. 6"96" X 27" 2.5 LBS/SQ. YD. GALVANIZED (DIPPED) EXANDED METAL LATH OVERLAPPED 3/4" AT SEAMS.OVERLAP LATH IN TOP OF FLASHING TO THE EDGE OF THE DECK SYSTEM WALL FINISH PER PLANWALL ASSEMBLY PER PLANBUILDING PAPER TO OVER LAP METAL FLASHINGPERFORATED J-MOLDWEST COAT OVER FLASHING AND UP WALL MININUM 2"MINIMUM 2" X 6", 26 GA. GALVANIZED BONDERIZED L-METALFLOOR ASSEMBLIES PER PLANJIFFY SEAL BETWEEN FLASHING AND SIBSTRATE 2 1/8" MIN.
2" MIN. 4" MIN.

SLOPE
SLOPE
MIN.
4"
NOTE: 1. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD MEASURE WALL WIDTH. CAP FLASHING TO HAVE TWO INCH SIDE RETURNS.2. NO TOP FASTING ALLOWED.MIN. 24 GA. GALV. IRON COVER PLATE PLEATED AT EDGEALUMINUM OR NICKEL PLATED FASTENER WITH NEOPRENE WASHER CENTERED OVER 1/4" GAP BETWEEN ADJACENT SECTIONS OF COPING.HEM CAP AROUND COPING JOINTGALV. ALUMINUM COPINGCONT. CLEAT1X NAILER RIPPED TO CREATE POSITIVE FLOW SLOPE
1X NAILER WALL FINISH PER PLANWATERPROOF MEMBRANE UNDERLAYMENTGUARD RAIL TYPE PER PLAN RAL3CONTINUOUS SILICONE SEALANT, BY OTHERS.TF316134 @ 20" O.C.

PLAN

VARIES PER
SILICONE ROOF BELLOW W/ 45 MIL. EPDM WATER BARRIER 50% MOVEMENT.RAL2CONTINUOUS SILICONE SEALANT, BY OTHERS.TF316134 @ 20" O.C.WB045NOTE: WATER BARRIER APPLY A MASTIC SETTING BED, BY OTHERS AD-103
15 Sim

EXTERIOR SIDING PER PLANFLOOR ASSEMBLY PER PLANWALL PER PLANCANT STRIPROOFING PER PLANSSTUCCOPARAPIT WALL PER PLAN

SITE BUILT PIECES
V
CUT

LEFT RIGHT

PREFABRICATED SCUPPER
FLASHING WITH WP-30

BACK FRONT
12" MIN.
4" MIN
4" MIN.
4" MIN.
4" MIN.
3" MIN.
4" MIN.

MIN. 1/4":12" SLOPE TO SCUPPERPLYWOODSTUCCO
SLOPE
NOTE:1. APLPY WESTCOAT WP-51 ON ALL FLASHING SEAMS AND OVERLAPS. STANDARD OVERLAP IS BOTTOM TO TOP WITH A 4" OVERLAP.

SLOPE 1/4":1'-0"SLOPE 1/4":1'-0"
NOTE: USE RIPPED 2X MEMEBERS OVER JOISTS TO OBTAIN SLOPE DECK SLOPING MATERIAL1/4" PER FOOT
12' MAX. BETWEEN DRAINS
AD-103
9 Sim
AD-103
10 Sim

OVERFLOW SCUPPER PER PLANROOF DRAIN PER PLAN
4"
CONTINUOUS 4" RETURN AT WALLSCAULK JOINT AROUND DRAIN PRIORTO COLOR COATGALVANIZED BONDERIZED DRAIN DECK PLATEADJUSTABLE REMOVABLE DRAIN CAP16 GUAGE STAINLESS STEEL STAINERNOTE:1. JIFFY SEAL ALL AROUND DRAIN2. DRAIN DECK PLATE MEASURES 10" SQUARE FOR 3" DRAIN3. SLOPE TO DRAIN @ 1/4":1'-0"4. USED AT ALL DECKS AND ROOFSBRONZE NO HUB ADAPTER SWEAT -SOLDERED TO PLATE

SLOPE TO
S

SCUPPER

LOPE TO SCUPPER
A

SECTION A-A

PARAPETSCUPPERDOWNSPOUT PER PLANFINISH MATERIAL PER PLANSCUPPERDOWNSPOUT PER PLANCRICKET A

SLOPE TO SCUPPER

SLOPE TO SCUPPER
A

SECTION A-A
R.D.
6"
A
CRICKET PER PLANPARAPET PER PLANROOF DRAINDOWNSPOUT IN WALLWALL FINISH PER PLANWALL ASSLEMBLY PER PLANGROUND LEVEL PER PLANDOWNSPOUT TO RUN DOWN WALL ASSEMBLY AND EXIT AT GROUND LEVEL PER PLAN.DOWNSPOUT TO BE APPROX. 6" ABOVE F.G.

INTERIOR EXTERIOR

STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFANODIZED METAL FLASHING W/HEMMED DRIP EDGE ON SELFADHEREDMEMEBRANE TO WRAP FASCIAFINISH PER

CEILING PLANFINISH PER PLAN

WALL ASSEMBLY PER PLANMETAL FLASHING DRIP EDGE
2x FULLDEPTH BLOCKING

INSULATION PER
PLAN

BEAM PER STRUCTURAL PLAN

ROOF FRAMING PER STRUCTURAL

SHEATING PER PLAN
5 NTS WATER-PROOF DRAIN1
19 3" = 1'-0" DECK TO WALL FLASHING1
15 NTS PARAPET FLASHING1
Drawn byReviewed by
1 A Project number
STRUCTURAL ENG:MEP:GENERAL CONTRACTOR:OWNER:

InDev+Design, Inc.2605 State St. San Diego, CA 92103Phone: 858.231.9914LIC# C18932 PROJECT ADDRESS:
2120 Columbia Street San Diego, CA 92101
Submittal DatePlan Date
08/29/201708/28/2017
PROJECT STATUS: BUILDING PERMIT SET
T-24 CONSULTANT:ENVISION ENGINEERING7734 Herchel Ave.La Jolla, CA 92037PHONE: 858.246.7745VANDER VEEN ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS42056 DELMONTE ST. TEMECULA, CA 92591PHONE: 951.795.5172VANDER VEEN ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS42056 DELMONTE ST. TEMECULA, CA 92591 B PHONE: 951.795.5172CD
2 3
4 5
1 2
3 4
5 PROJECT NAME:GEOTECHNICAL:CHRISTIAN WHEELER ENGINEERING3980 HOME AVE.SAN DIEGO, CA 92105PHONE: 619.550.1700 AD-103
5/4/2022 1:59:20 PM ROOF DETAILS
CJN
ZS/CG

CANTERA

CANTERA
8 3" = 1'-0" BUILDING SEPERATION @ ROOF1
20 1" = 1'-0" PARAPET CANT1
9 NTS SCUPPER1
14 NTS CRICKET DETAIL1
10 1 1/2" = 1'-0" DECK/ROOF DRAIN1
18 1/2" = 1'-0" SCUPPER TO DOWNSPOUT113 1/2" = 1'-0" DOWNSPOUT IN WALL1 4 1 1/2" = 1'-0" STANDING METAL SEAM
Revision Schedule
Rev. # Revision Date

Page 161 of 615 ends

Drawn by
Reviewed by
1 D Project number
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER:GENERAL CONTRACTOR:OWNER:

Robert Traylor3664 Charles St.San Diego, CA 92106
InDev + Design, INC © 2014 All Rights Reserved
InDev, Inc.2605 State St. San Diego, CA 92103Phone: 619 580-0201CSLB# 971403DESIGNED BY:

InDev+Design, Inc.2605 State St. San Diego, CA 92103Phone: 618 580-0201LIC# C18932 PROJECT ADDRESS:
3664 Charles StSan Diego, CA 92106
Submittal DatePlan Date
10/08/2009/15/20
PROJECT STATUS: DSD SUBMITAL SET
T-24 CONSULTANT:TBDADDRESSCITY, CA 90000PHONE:TBDADDRESSCITY, CA 90000PHONE:

CBA
2 3
4 5
1 2
3 4
5 09172020
AB
ZS/CG
SOILS ENGINEER:TBDADDRESSCITY, CA 90000PHONE:PROJECT NAME:The Bird House AD-104
5/4/2022 1:59:29 PM SPECIFICATIONS
09 20 00 - PLASTER AND GYPSUM BOARD
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL PROTECTION NECESSARY TO PRESERVE THE WORK OF OTHERS FREEFROM DAMAGE DUE TO LATH AND PLASTER OPERATIONS.ALL INSIDE ANGLES SHALL BE REINFORCED WITH "INTERNAL CORNER REINFORCEMENT."ALL EXTERNAL ANGLES SHALL RECEIVE "SQUARE NOSE", PLUMB AND TRUE, CORNERS TO BE 90 AS POSSIBLE.INSTALL STUCCO WEEP SCREED AT INTERSECTION OF GROUND FLOOR SLAB AND BOTTOM PLATEMETAL CASING BEAD (METAL PLASTER SCREEDS) SHALL BE INSTALLED WHERE DETAILED AS FOLLOWS:

1. WHERE PLASTER OR STUCCO FINISHES AGAINST ANY OTHER MATERIAL.2. WHERE PLASTER OR STUCCO FINISHES WITHOUT ABUTTING ANY OTHER TYPE OF MATERIAL.3. AROUND OPENINGS IN PLASTERED OR STUCCOED SURFACES.ALL METAL TRIM SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH NEATLY MITERED ANGLES IN FULL LENGTH WITHOUT PIECING WHEREPOSSIBLE. PIECING SHALL BE SUN JOINED WITH FLUSH JOINTS; SET PLUMB AND TRUE TO LINE, RIGIDLYFASTENED TO SURFACE.ALL FOUNDATION WALLS SHALL RECEIVE STUCCO COLOR COAT TO MATCH BUILDING. PREPARE WALLS ASNEEDED PRIOR TO STUCCO.CLEAN PREMISES OF ALL PLASTER DEBRIS DAILY. REMOVE SPOTS AND STAINS FROM ALL SURFACES IMEDIATLY.CONTRACTOR TO BREAK OUT SCAFFOLDING AS A SEPARATE ITEM IN BID.PROVIDE OWNER WITH ONE SACK OF COLOR COAT UPON COMPLETION. WAX ALL WOWS PRIOR TO SCRATCHCOAT. REMOVE ALL STUCCO AND WAX UPON COMPLETION.WATER SEAL WITH PER SPECIFICATION SECTION 07115, OR EQUAL, WITHIN 3 FEET OF GROUND WHEREADJACENT TO DIRT AREAS.LATH NAILING CURRENT CBC: STUCCO SHALL BE EXPANDED METAL OR WOVEN WIRE LATH AND PORTLANDCEMENT PLASTER 7 /8" THICK. NUMBER 11 GAUGE, 1 1/2" LONG, 7 /16" HEAD SELF-FURRING NAILS OR NO. 16GAUGE STAPLES WITH 7 /8" LEGS SHALL BE USED TO ATTACH LATH TO ALL STUDS, TOP PLATES, AND BOTTOMPLATES AT 6" O/C.ALL LATH APPLIED OVER PLYWOOD SHALL BE SELF-FURRING NAILS AND NOT STAPLES.EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE GALVANIZED 7 /8" DEPTH AND LOCATED WHERE INDICATED ON PLANS ANDELEVATIONS - WHERE NOT INDICATED, INSTALL AT APPROXIMATELY 24' O.C. ALTHOUGH OWNER TO VERIFYPLACEMENT.WEATHER RESISTIVE BARRIERS. ALL WEATHER EXPOSED SURFACES SHALL HAVE A WEATHER RESISTIVEBARRIER TO PROTECT THE INTERIOR WALL COVERING. SUCH BARRIER SHALL BE EQUAL TO THAT PROVIDED FORU.B.C. STANDARD NO. 14-1 FOR KRAFT WATERPROOF BUILDING PAPER OR U.B.C. STANDARD NO. 14-1 FORASPHALT SATURATED RAG FELT. BUILDING PAPER AND FELT SHALL BE FREE FROM HOLES AND BREAKS OTHERTHAN THOSE CREATED BY FASTENERS AND CONSTRUCTION SYSTEM DUE TO ATTACHING OF THE BUILDINGPAPER, AND SHALL BE APPLIED OVER STUDS OR SHEATHING OF ALL EXTERIOR WALLS. SUCH FELT OR PAPERSHALL BE APPLIED WEATHERBOARD FASHION, LAPPED NOT LESS THAN 2 INCHES AT HORIZONTAL JOINTS AND NOT LESS THAN 6 INCHES AT VERTICAL JOINTS.FLASHING AND COUNTER FLASHING. EXTERIOR OPENINGS EXPOSED TO THE WEATHER SHALL BE FLASHED INSUCH A MANNER AS TO MAKE THEM WEATHERPROOF.IF IT IS CONTRACTORS DESIRE TO STORE MATERIALS ON JOB SITE PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK,OWNER’S APPROVAL IS REQUIRED. CONTRACTOR WILL ASSUME COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR SAIDMATERIALS AND IF DAMAGED OR STOLLEN WILL REPLACE AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER. 09 29 00 - GYPSUM BOARD
SCOPE: THE WORK SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROVIDING AND INSTALLING COMPLETE DRYWALL TOCOMPLETE THE WORK. ALL DRYWALL TO BE MINIMUM OF 5/8” TYPE “X”.DRYWALL TO BE INSTALLED IN COMPLETE ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS ANDFOLLOWING SPECIFICATIONS:EXAMINE ALL SURFACES TO RECEIVE DRYWALL BEFORE APPLYING ANY WORK. NOTIFY OWNER IN WRITING OFANY UNSATISFACTORY CONDITIONS. STARTING WORK WITHOUT SUCH NOTIFICATION CONSTITUTESACCEPTANCE OF SURFACES TO RECEIVE THIS WORK AND RESPONSIBILITY FOR SAME.TEXTURES: WALLS AND CEILINGS TO RECEIVE A LEVEL FOUR SMOOTH SANDED FINISH. PROVIDE SAMPLES TOOWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.DRYWALL TO RETURN TO WINDOWS.JOINT CEMENT AND TAPE ALL JOINTS. ALL JOINTS TO BE THREE CAST INSTALLATION NOT LESS THAN 12" WIDE,SANDED AND READY TO PAINT.MAKE A CLOSE FITTING CUT AROUND ALL LIGHT OUTLETS, PLUGS, SWITCHES, ETC. INSTALL METAL CORNERBEAD ON ALL WINDOW OPENINGS AND WHERE DRYWALL ABUTS A DIFFERENT MATERIAL. ALL OUTSIDE CORNERSSHALL RECEIVE SQUARE CORNER BEADS.USE WATER-RESISTANT GYPSUM BOARD AT BATHROOMS OWNER TO VERIFY TYPE. INSTALL OVER VAPOR BARRIER OF A TYPE WHICH IS NOT A VAPOR RETARDER.GYPSUM BOARD SHALL BE 5/8" THICK ON WALLS AND CEILING IN LIVING AREA. GARAGE SHALL RECEIVE 5/8"GYPSUM BOARD. SINGLE, DOUBLE AND TRIPLE LAYER(S) OF GYPSUM BOARD PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. ALLGYPSUM BOARD TO BE 5/8” TYPE “X”. U.N.O.CAULKING: ALL OPENINGS, JOINTS, MEETINGS OF DISSIMILAR MATERIALS, ETC. WHERE TIGHTNESS OF BUILDINGIS AFFECTED, SHALL BE CAULKED WITH APPROVED CAULKING COMPOUNDS APPROPRIATE FOR THE USEREQUIRED AND OF COLOR MATCHING ADJOINING SURFACES BY CONTRACTOR.ALL WINDOWS, FLOORS, DOOR JAMBS, GLAZING AND METAL WORK TO BE LEFT CLEAN. CONTRACTOR TOREMOVE ALL EXCESS GYPSUM BOARD, TAPE, DRYWALL MUD, ETC. FROM JOBSITE UPON COMPLETION.IF IT IS CONTRACTORS DESIRE TO STORE MATERIALS ON JOB SITE PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK,OWNER’S APPROVAL IS REQUIRED. CONTRACTOR WILL ASSUME COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR SAIDMATERIALS AND IF DAMAGED OR STOLLEN WILL REPLACE AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER. CONTRACTORWILL ALSO ASSUME COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGE TO THE BUILDING DUE TO LOADINGOF ANY AND ALL DRYWALL. 09 60 00 - FLOORING
PROVIDE AND INSTALL LAMINATE OR WOOD FLOORING AS APPROVED BY OWNER. ALL COLORS SHALL BE AS APPROVED BY OWNER. SUBMIT SAMPLES WITH COST ALTERNATIVES.NO VINYL’S CONTAINING ASBESTOS SHALL BE INSTALLED.SOUND MATT PER OWNER.SEE INTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND FINISH SCHEDULE FOR LOCATION OF FLOORING AND BASES.IF IT IS CONTRACTORS DESIRE TO STORE MATERIALS ON JOB SITE PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK,OWNER’S APPROVAL IS REQUIRED. CONTRACTOR WILL ASSUME COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR SAIDMATERIALS AND IF DAMAGED OR STOLLEN WILL REPLACE AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER. 09 68 00 - CARPETING
ALL CARPETING SHALL BE AS APPROVED BY OWNER. SUBMIT SAMPLES WITH COST ALTERNATIVES.ALL CARPET ABUTTING A DISSIMILAR MATERIAL OR FINISH SHALL BE BANDED BY A METAL EDGING ADEQUATELYSECURING THE EDGE OF THE CARPETING.INSTALL WITH MINIMUM 3/8" 7LB WEIGHT.IF IT IS CONTRACTORS DESIRE TO STORE MATERIALS ON JOB SITE PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK,OWNER’S APPROVAL IS REQUIRED. CONTRACTOR WILL ASSUME COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR SAIDMATERIALS AND IF DAMAGED OR STOLLEN WILL REPLACE AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER. 09 90 00 - PAINTING AND COATING
ALL PAINTING AND FINISHING SHALL BE CAREFULLY DONE AND LEFT PERFECT. NO PAINT SPOTS SHALL BE LEFTON GLASS, HARDWARE OR OTHER FINISHED WORK. ALL WORKMANSHIP SHALL BE OF THE VERY BEST, WITH ALLMATERIALS EVENLY SPREAD AND SMOOTHLY FLOWED ON WITHOUT RUNS OR SAGGING OF MATERIALS. THECONTRACTOR SHALL CAREFULLY PREPARE ALL SURFACES BEFORE PAINTING BY CUTTING, STRIPPING, FILLING,ETC., TO INSURE A SMOOTH, UNIFORM SURFACE WITHOUT VARIATION OF GLOSS, SUCTION OR OTHER BLEMISH.EXAMINE ALL SURFACES TO RECEIVE PAINT BEFORE APPLYING ANY WORK.ALL PAINT FINISHED WOODWORK SHALL BE PRIMED ON ALL EXPOSED SIDES. ALL PRIMING SHALL BE DONEBEFORE SETTING AND PLASTERING. ALL EXTERIOR DOOR FRAMES AND DOORS TO BE PRIMED ON ALL 4 SIDESAND ENDS BEFORE INSTALLATION. DOORS AND FRAMES TO BE STAINED OR PAINTED AND SHALL BE SEALED ONALL SIDES. OWNER TO VERIFY PAINT OR STAIN.COLORS SHALL BE AS SELECTED AND/OR APPROVED BY OWNER. COLOR CHARTS TO BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TOWORK.WALLS AND CEILINGS ALL AREAS EXCEPT BATHROOMS AND KITCHENS: 1 COAT BEHR PREMIUM PLUS PRIMERAND SEALER SPRAY APPLIED, FOLLOWED BY 2 COATS BEHR PREMIUM PLUS INTERIOR FLAT WHITE, OR ASSELECTED BY OWNER.WALLS AND CEILINGS IN BATHROOMS AND KITCHENS: 1 COAT BEHR PREMIUM PLUS PRIMER AND SEALER SPRAYAPPLIED, FOLLOWED BY 2 COATS BEHR PREMIUM PLUS INTERIOR SEMI GLOSS WHITE, OR AS SELECTED BYOWNER.BASE, TRIM, AND DOOR JAMBS: 1 COAT BEHR PREMIUM PLUS PRIMER AND SEALER SPRAY APPLIED, FOLLOWEDBY 2 COATS BEHR PREMIUM PLUS INTERIOR GLOSS WHITE, OR AS SELECTED BY OWNER.EXPOSED WOOD: STAIN AND SEAL TO MATCH FLOORING COLOR. OWNER TO VERIFY LOCATION.SHELVES AND BUILT-INS: (ENAMEL) 1 COAT BEHR PREMIUM PLUS PRIMER AND SEALER SPRAY APPLIED,FOLLOWED BY 2 COATS BEHR PREMIUM PLUS INTERIOR GLOSS WHITE, OR AS SELECTED BY OWNER.SPAY APPLIED: ALL PRIMER, SEALER AND PAINT TO BE SPRAY APPLIED.EXTERIOR WOOD: TRANSPARENT STAIN OR PAINT AS SELECTED BY OWNER.EXTERIOR WOOD ENTRANCE DOORS: (ALL SIDES) 1 COAT BEHR PREMIUM PLUS PRIMER AND SEALER SPRAY APPLIED, FOLLOWED BY 2 COATS BEHR PREMIUM PLUS EXTERIOR SATIN PAINT. COLOR TO MATCH WINDOWFRAMES. OWNER TO VERIFY.WOOD TRIM: SEMITRANSPARENT STAIN OR PAINT AS SELECTED BY OWNER.HARDBOARD SIDING: PAINT SHALL BE AS RECOMMENDED BY SIDING MANUFACTURER. 10 30 00 - FIREPLACES AND STOVES
PREFABRICATED FIREPLACES, IF APPLICABLE, SHALL BE AS MANUFACTURED BY HEAT-N-GLOW OR EQUIVALENT.

INSTALL WITH GAS LOG LIGHTER. USE HEARTH EXTENSION WHERE HEARTH IS INSTALLED ON COMBUSTIBLECONSTRUCTION. INSTALL STRICTLY IN CONFORMANCE WITH: MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATION MANUAL; ALLLOCAL CODES; AND ALL CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION REQUIREMENTS, I.E.THE FLUE DAMPER MUST BE TIGHT FITTING WITH AN ACCESSIBLE CONTROL.CONTINUOUS BURNING GAS PILOT LIGHTS ARE PROHIBITED.THE USE OF INDOOR AIR TO COOL THE FIREBOX WHEN THAT INDOOR AIR IS VENTED TO THE OUTSIDE OF THEBUILDING IS PROHIBITED.WHERE FIREPLACES ARE ON AN EXTERIOR WALL: THE ENTIRE OPENING OF THE FIREBOX MUST BE COVEREDWITH A TIGHT FITTING, CLOSEABLE GLASS DOOR.THE FIREBOX MUST HAVE AN OUTSIDE AIR INTAKE WHICH HAS AN AREA OF 6 SQUARE INCHES. THIS AIR INTAKE MUST HAVE A TIGHT FITTING DAMPER (NOT THE SAME AS THE FLUE DAMPER) WHICH IS OPERABLE AND READILYACCESSIBLE.IF IT IS CONTRACTORS DESIRE TO STORE MATERIALS ON JOB SITE PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK,OWNER’S APPROVAL IS REQUIRED. CONTRACTOR WILL ASSUME COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR SAIDMATERIALS AND IF DAMAGED OR STOLLEN WILL REPLACE AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER. 22 00 00 - PLUMBING
THE SANITARY SYSTEM WITH CONNECTION FROM THE PLUMBING FIXTURES AND EQUIPMENT TO THE PUBLICSEWER.THE WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM WITH CONNECTION FROM THE WATER SERVICE.

THE STORM WATER DRAIN SYSTEM FROM ROOF TO THE DISCHARGE.THE SUMP PUMP SYSTEM.MINI SPLIT CONDENSATE LINES.HOT WATER SYSTEM INCLUDING CONNECTIONS FROM WATER HEATER TO FIXTURES, DRAIN PANS, ETC., ASREQUIRED BY THE BUILDING DEPT.INSTALLATION OF THE OWNER SUPPLIED PLUMBING FIXTURES COMPLETE WITH TRIM.INCIDENTAL ITEMS NOT INDICATED ON THE DRAWING NOR MENTIONED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS BUT WHICH ARE NECESSARY TO PROVIDE A GOOD AND COMPLETE JOB IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE UNIFORM PLUMBING CODEAND IN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL LOCAL CODES AND ORDINANCES.THE WORK SHALL NOT BE COVERED UP OR BE ENCLOSED UNTIL IT HAS BEEN INSPECTED AND TESTED. SHOULDANY SUCH WORK BE ENCLOSED BEFORE AN INSPECTION, IT SHALL BE UNCOVERED. THEN, AFTER THE WORK HASBEEN TESTED AND APPROVED, REPAIRS SHALL BE MADE TO RESTORE THE WORK TO ITS ORIGINAL AND PROPER CONDITIONS.ATTENTION IS ESPECIALLY CALLED TO THE FACT THAT THE PLUMBING CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLEFOR DAMAGE TO ANY PART OF THE PREMISES CAUSED BY LEAKS OR BREAKS IN THE PIPE OR FIXTURESINSTALLED UNDER THIS SECTION FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FROM THE DATE OF ACCEPTANCE OF THECOMPLETION OF THE WORK BY THE OWNER AND CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY BY THE BUILDING OFFICAL.THE PLUMBING CONTRACTOR SHALL DO THE NECESSARY TRENCH EXCAVATION SHORING AND BACKFILLING FORPROPER LAYING OF PIPELINES IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES. BOTTOM OF THE TRENCHES SHALL BE CUT TO GRADE. NO BACKFILLING SHALL BE DONE UNTIL THE PLUMBING INSTALLATIONS HAVE BEENAPPROVED BY THE INSPECTION DEPARTMENT. THE PIPING SHALL BE INSTALLED PROMPTLY AFTER THEEXCAVATION TO KEEP THE TRENCHES OPEN AS SHORT A TIME AS POSSIBLE. PLUMBING CONTRACTOR TO BERESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ANY O.S.H.A. PERMITS.THE PLUMBING CONTRACTOR SHALL DO THE CUTTING, CHIPPING, DIGGING OR DRILLING NECESSARY FORPROPER INSTALLATION OF HIS WORK. HE SHALL ASCERTAIN THE OPENINGS ARE PROPERLY LOCATED;

OTHERWISE HE SHALL CUT NEW OPENINGS AT HIS OWN EXPENSE AND REIMBURSE OTHER SUBCONTRACTORS FOR ANY DAMAGE DONE TO THEIR WORK BY UNNECESSARY CUTTING, CHIPPING, DIGGING OR DRILLING.PLUMBING CONTRACTOR TO FURNISH AND INSTALL ALL NECESSARY UNDER TRIM, TRAPS, STOPS, SUPPLIES,ETC. (CHROME WHERE EXPOSED). METAL FOR ALL.ALL WATER SUPPLY PIPING SHALL BE TYPE "L" COLOR CODED, COLD HARD DRAWN SEAMLESS COPPER TUBINGMADE UP WITH WROUGHT COPPER OR CAST FITTINGS WITH SOLDER JOINTS. NO JOINTS BENEATH SLABS. PEX ISALLOWED AS A BID ALTERNATE.SOLDERS: EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY 1, 1987, CALIFORNIA STATE BUILDING STANDARDS PROHIBIT THE USE OFSOLDERS CONTAINING MORE THAN 2/10 OF 1% LEAD IN MAKING JOINTS AND FITTINGS IN ANY CONSTRUCTION,POTABLE WATER SYSTEMS OR USER PIPELINES.ABS SOIL AND VENT PIPE SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE. CASTIRON AS REQUIRED BY PLAN.CLEANOUTS SHALL BE THE SAME SIZE AS THE PIPE, 4'' MAX. INSTALLED IN SOLID AND WASTE LINES AT EVERY 90DEGREE CHANGE OF DIRECTOR AND AT EVERY ONE HUNDRED FEET OF RUN AND ACCESSIBLE AT ALL TIMES.WHEN OCCURRING IN A FINISHED WALL OR FLOOR, THE CLEANOUTS SHALL BE SET FLUSH WITH THESURROUNDING SURFACE WITH CHROMIUM ACCESS PLATES. IN FLOORS, THE CLEANOUTS SHALL BE SMITH 4470SERIES, OR EQUIVALENT.VENTS SHALL EXTEND 10" THROUGH THE ROOF, BE COLLECTIVE IF PRACTICAL, AND ROUTED TO THE REAR OFTHE ROOF RIDGE WHERE PRACTICAL. THE VENTS SHALL BE FLASHED WITH STANDARD FLASH. VENTS MAY BE ABS WHERE PERMITTED BY CODE.PROVIDE IRRIGATION POINTS OF CONNECTION W/SHUTOFF VALVES AS INDICATED, SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS, IF APPLICABLE.FLOOR DRAINS REQUIRE TRAP PRIMERS OR EQUIVALENT.

OWNER WILL SUPPLY FIXTURES.PROVIDE PVC OR CPVC CONDENSATION LINE FROM AIR CONDITIONING UNITS AND DRAIN TO LAVATORY TRAP.PLANS DICTATE TYPE OF CONDENSATE LINE.NATURAL GAS: INSTALL AND HOOKUP ALL NATURAL GAS LINES AND GAS EQUIPMENT.HOSE BIBS: PROVIDE ON BUILDING WHERE INDICATED ON DRAWINGS - 3/4" SUPPLY AT HOSE BIBS. PROVIDEPERMANENT VACUUM BREAKERS ON ALL HOSE BIBS.BATHTUBS: PLUMBER TO INSTALL BATHTUBS WHICH HAVE AN INTEGRAL NONSKID FINISH CAST IN THE FLOOR OFTHE TUBS. INSTALL BATHTUB OVERFLOWS. PLUMBER TO PROVIDE AND INSTALL SHOWERHEADS AT A MINIMUMOF 6' -6" ABOVE THE FLOOR OF THE BATH TUB OR SHOWER.WATER HEATERS: SEE PLANS FOR SPECIFICATIONS OF WATER HEATERS. ALL WATER HEATERS SHALL BE ONC.E.C. APPROVED LIST. PLUMBER TO PROVIDE AND INSTALL FLUES FOR WATER HEATERS, AND T & P RELIEFVALVE. PLUMBER TO PROVIDE WATER HEATER.DRAIN PANS: IF CALLED FOR IN DRAWINGS, PLUMBER TO PROVIDE AND INSTALL DRAIN PANS AND DRAINS AS APPROVED BY OWNER FOR WATER HEATERS AND WASHING MACHINES.EXCESSIVE WATER PRESSURE - WHERE LOCAL WATER PRESSURE IS IN EXCESS OF EIGHTY (80) POUNDS PERSQUARE INCH, AN APPROVED TYPE PRESSURE REGULATOR PRECEDED BY AN ADEQUATE STRAINER SHALL BEINSTALLED AND THE PRESSURE REDUCED TO EIGHTY (80) POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH OR LESS. FOR POTABLEWATER SERVICES UP TO AND INCLUDING ONE AND ONE HALF ( 1-1 /2) INCH REGULATORS, PROVISION SHALL BEMADE TO PREVENT PRESSURE ON THE BUILDING SIDE OF THE REGULATOR FROM EXCEEDING MAIN SUPPLYPRESSURE. APPROVED REGULATORS WITH INTEGRAL BY-PASSES ARE ACCEPTABLE. EACH SUCH REGULATORAND STRAINER SHALL BE ACCESSIBLY LOCATED AND SHALL HAVE THE STRAINER READILY ACCESSIBLE FORCLEANING WITHOUT REMOVING THE REGULATOR OR STRAINER BODY OR DISCONNECTING THE SUPPLY PIPING.ALL PIPE SIZE DETERMINATIONS SHALL BE BASED ON EIGHTY (80) PERCENT OF THE REDUCED PRESSURE.T & P RELIEF VALVES: EACH PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE SHALL BE AN APPROVED AUTOMATIC TYPE WITH DRAIN,AND EACH SUCH RELIEF VALVE SHALL BE SET AT A PRESSURE OF NOT MORE THAN ONE HUNDRED FIFTY (150)POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH. RELIEF VALVES LOCATED INSIDE A BUILDING SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH A FULL SIZEDRAIN OF HARD DRAWN COPPER PIPING AND FITTINGS AND SHALL EXTEND FROM THE VALVE TO THE OUTSIDE OF THE BUILDING WITH THE END OF THE PIPE NOT MORE THAN TWO (2) FEET NOR LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHESABOVE THE GROUND AND POINTING DOWNWARD. SUCH DRAIN MAY TERMINATE AT OTHER APPROVEDLOCATIONS. NO PART OF SUCH DRAIN PIPE SHALL BE TRAPPED AND THE TERMINAL END OF THE DRAIN PIPESHALL NOT BE THREADED.TITLE 24 MANDATORY ENERGY CONSERVATION REQUIREMENTS: THE FOLLOWING ARE MINIMUM STANDARDSONLY AND DO NOT SUPERSEDE ANY MORE RESTRICTIVE STANDARDS FOUND IN THE PLANS OR SPECIFICATIONS.WATER HEATER TANK INSULATION: STORAGE TYPE WATER HEATERS, AND STORAGE AND BACKUP TANKS FOR SOLAR WATER HEATING SYSTEMS MUST BE WRAPPED WITH AN INSULATION BLANKET HAVING AN R-VALUE OF 12OR GREATER. THIS REQUIREMENT APPLIES TO STORAGE TANKS USED PRIMARILY FOR DOMESTIC WATERHEATING SYSTEMS AND NOT TO STORAGE TANKS USED PRIMARILY FOR SPACE HEATING SYSTEMS.WATER HEATER PIPE INSULATION: THE FIRST FIVE FEET OF HOT WATER OUTLET PIPE FROM THE WATER HEATERTANK IN UNCONDITIONED SPACE SHALL BE WRAPPED WITH INSULATION HAVING A THERMAL RESISTANCE OF R-3OR GREATER.PIPE INSULATION: RECIRCULATING HOT WATER PIPING IN ATTICS, GARAGES, CRAWL SPACES, OR UNHEATEDSPACES OTHER THAN BETWEEN FLOORS OR IN INTERIOR WALLS MUST BE INSULATED TO PROVIDE A MAXIMUMHEAT LOSS OF NOT MORE THAN 50 BTU/HOUR PER LINEAR FOOT FOR PIPING UP TO AND INCLUDING 2 INCHNOMINAL DIAMETER AND 100 BTU/HOUR PER LINEAR FOOT FOR LARGER SIZES.WATER HEATING EQUIPMENT EFFICIENCY: NO WATER HEATING EQUIPMENT SHALL BE INSTALLED UNLESS THEMANUFACTURER HAS CERTIFIED THAT EQUIPMENT WITH THE CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION. THISREQUIREMENT APPLIES TO: GAS-FIRED, STORAGE WATER HEATERS. ELECTRIC, STORAGE WATER HEATERS. OIL-FIRED, AUTOMATIC, STORAGE WATER HEATERS.

AND AIR CONDITIONING
23 00 00 - HEATING, VENTING,
GENERAL: THE WORK UNDER THIS SECTION INCLUDES EVERYTHING NECESSARY FOR AND INCIDENTAL TOEXECUTING AND COMPLETING THE HEATING, VENTILATING AND AIR CONDITIONING. PROVIDE PLANS FORAPPROVAL TO OWNER. SIZING OF SYSTEM SHALL CONFORM TO PRUDENT STANDARDS OF THE TRADE AND INACCORD WITH TITLE 24 ENERGY CONSERVATION STANDARDS.CONTROLS: UNITS SHALL BE PURCHASED WITH 24 VOLT CONTROL SYSTEM. THIS SYSTEM SHALL INCLUDETRANSFORMER AND THERMOSTAT. THERMOSTATS SHALL BE INSTALLED AS LOCATED ON THE DRAWINGS.PACKAGED VALVE: UNITS SHALL BE SUPPLIED WITH A PACKAGED TYPE GAS VALVE WHICH HAS A PRESSUREREGULATOR, SHUT OFF VALVE AND MAIN GAS VALVE COMBINED INTO ONE SINGLE PACKAGE.SHEET METAL AND DUCTWORK: THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH AND INSTALL ALL SHEET METAL DUCTWORK AND PLENUMS NECESSARY FOR A COMPLETE INSTALLATION. CONSTRUCTION, GAUGES ANDINSTALLATION OF DUCTS SHALL CONFORM TO UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE, UNLESS MORE RESTRICTIVE WITHINTHIS SPECIFICATION, AND SHALL HAVE SMOOTH INTERIORS.DAMPERS: PROVIDE MANUALLY OPERATED, OPPOSED BLADE DAMPERS AS NECESSARY TO BALANCE THESYSTEM.PERFORMANCE: CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE REQUIRED AIR THROW AND SPREAD WITH NO APPARENTDRAFTS OR EXCESSIVE AIR MOVEMENT WITHIN THE AIR CONDITIONED AREA. ANY AIR DISTRIBUTIONACCESSORIES REQUIRED TO EFFECT THESE CONDITIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED AND INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR.GRILLES, REGISTERS OR CEILING DIFFUSERS CAUSING EXCESSIVE AIR MOVEMENTS, DRAFTS OROBJECTIONABLE NOISE, SHALL BE REPLACED AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.INSULATION: ALL INSULATION SHALL CONFORM TO TITLE 24 STANDARDS.CLEANING EQUIPMENT AND PREMISES: THOROUGHLY CLEAN ALL PARTS OF THE REGISTER, GRILLES, ANDEQUIPMENT.OPERATING INSTRUCTION AND SERVICE MANUAL: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CAREFULLY PREPARE FOUR (4)OPERATION INSTRUCTION AND SERVICE MANUALS FOR THE ENTIRE SYSTEM INCLUDING ALL EQUIPMENT,EXCEPT OWNER FURNISHED EQUIPMENT. THEY SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL IMMEDIATELY UPONCOMPLETION OF THE WORK.THERMOSTATS: PROVIDE SETBACK THERMOSTATS THAT CAN BE MANUALLY PROGRAMMED FOR AT LEAST 2- HEATING PERIODS WITH-IN 24 HOURS.IF IT IS CONTRACTORS DESIRE TO STORE MATERIALS ON JOB SITE PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK,OWNER’S APPROVAL IS REQUIRED. CONTRACTOR WILL ASSUME COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR SAIDMATERIALS AND IF DAMAGED OR STOLLEN WILL REPLACE AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER. 26 00 00 - ELECTRICAL
SCOPE: THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, TOOLS, TRANSPORTATION,EQUIPMENT, SERVICES AND FACILITIES REQUIRED FOR THE COMPLETE AND SUBSTANTIAL INSTALLATION OF ALLELECTRICAL WORK SHOWN ON THE PLANS OR OUTLINED IN THESE SPECIFICATIONS. THE WORK SHALL INCLUDE ALL MATERIALS, APPLIANCES, AND APPARATUS NOT SPECIFICALLY MENTIONED HEREIN OR NOT ON THE PLANS,BUT WHICH ARE NECESSARY TO MAKE A COMPLETE, PROPERLY FUNCTIONING INSTALLATION OF ALLELECTRICAL SYSTEMS SHOWN ON THE PLANS OR DESCRIBED HEREIN.THE WORK INCLUDES, BUT IS NOT NECESSARILY LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING:ELECTRIC SERVICE, INCLUDING CONDUIT, CABLE TO THE POINT OF CONNECTION WITH THE UTILITY COMPANY'SFACILITIES.PROVIDE TELEVISION PREWIRE. PROVIDE OUTLET FOR SIGNAL AMPLIFIER EQUIPMENT.THE MAIN DISTRIBUTION PANEL CONSISTING OF METERING EQUIPMENT AND FEEDER SWITCHES OR CIRCUITBREAKER TYPE.FURNISHING AND INSTALLATION OF BRANCH CIRCUIT PANELS, FOR POWER AND LIGHTING.COMPLETE BRANCH CIRCUIT WIRING SYSTEM FOR LIGHTING, MOTORS, RECEPTACLES, ETC., AS SHOWN.INSTALLATION OF LIGHTING FIXTURES, INDICATED WALL SWITCHES, RECEPTACLES, ETC., AS SHOWN.FURNISHING AND INSTALLATION OF TELEPHONE CONDUITS UNDERGROUND AND TELEPHONE PREWIRE, ASINDICATED OR SPECIFIED. VERIFY REQUIREMENTS WITH TELEPHONE VENDOR AND TELEPHONE UTILITY.EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL REQUIRED FOR THIS WORK. BACKFILL TO BE 903 COMPACTION.PROVIDE AND INSTALL MOTOR STARTERS, WHERE SPECIFIED.MAIN SERVICE, PANEL BOARDS, ETC., AS SHOWN ON PLANS.THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL LINE VOLTAGE WIRING INCLUDING DISCONNECT SWITCH ANDFINAL CONNECTION TO ALL HEATING AND PLUMBING EQUIPMENT.WHERE INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS, INSTALL EXHAUST FANS AND DUCTS FOR BATHROOMS, DRESSINGAREAS, LAUNDRY, KITCHEN, ETC.THERMOSTATS TO BE LINE VOLTAGE, IF APPLICABLE.HOOK UP FOR ELECTRIC SERVICE EQUIPMENT CONNECTIONS TO MOTORS SHALL BE MADE WITH COPPERCONDUCTORS.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ARRANGE FOR, SECURE AND PAY FOR ALL PERMITS AND INSPECTIONS REQUIRED.

EXAMINATION OF DOCUMENTS AND SITE: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE LICENSED TO PERFORM THE WORKOUTLINED, TO BE FAMILIAR WITH ALL LOCAL CODES HAVING JURISDICTION AND TO HAVE REVIEWED THEDRAWING AND SPECIFICATIONS AND VERIFIED THAT ALL SYSTEMS CONTAINED THEREON ARE IN COMPLIANCEWITH THOSE CODES HAVING JURISDICTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CAREFULLY EXAMINE THE BUILDING SITEAND COMPARE THE DRAWINGS WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS. HE WILL, FURTHER, VERIFY ALL UTILITY REQUIREMENTS WITH THE PROPER UTILITY COMPANIES INVOLVED. BY THE ACT OF SUBMITTING A BID, THECONTRACTOR SHALL BE DEEMED TO HAVE ACCEPTED SUCH CONDITIONS AND RESPONSIBILITY, AND TO HAVEMADE ALLOWANCES THEREFORE IN PREPARING HIS FIGURE SO THAT THERE WILL BE NO ADDITIONAL COSTSREQUESTED FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MADE BY THOSE AGENCIES HAVING JURISDICTION.THE WARRANTY PERIOD SHALL EXTEND ONE YEAR FROM THE DATE OF ACCEPTABLE ADJUSTMENTS OF THE COMPLETE INSTALLATION.THE WORK SHALL BE SEQUENCED AND ROUTED SO AS TO EFFECT A MINIMUM CUTTING OF THE STRUCTURE.SLEEVES, CANS, OR THE MATERIAL ITSELF SHALL BE PLACED PRIOR TO POURING CONCRETE. ANY NECESSARYFITTING AND RELATED ROUTING SHALL BE AS DIRECTED BY OWNER AND UNDER HIS SUPERVISION.RACEWAYS SHALL BE RUN CONCEALED IN ALL AREAS EXCEPT AS NOTED ON PLANS.RACEWAYS SUBJECT TO ABUSE, EXPOSED TO WEATHER OR MOIST CONDITIONS OR BURIED IN EARTH ORCONCRETE, SHALL BE RIGID CONDUIT WITH LIQUID AND GAS TIGHT JOINTS AND ENDS CAPPED WITH APPROVEDCONDUIT SEALS DURING CONSTRUCTION. RACEWAY SHALL HAVE MINIMUM OF 1" COVER WHERE BURIED INCONCRETE.PROVIDE TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION POWER SERVICE INCLUDING SETTING OF METER, REQUIRED OUTLETSAND MISCELLANEOUS CABLES. OWNER TO PAY FOR TEMPORARY POWER PERMITS & ELECTRICITY.OPERATION TESTS: PROVIDE ALL INSTRUMENTS AND EQUIPMENT REQUIRED TO MAKE ALL TESTS NECESSARYFOR SHORTS, OPEN CIRCUITS, GROUND, INSULATION RESISTANCE AND CORRECT PERFORMANCE. IMMEDIATELYCORRECT ALL DEFECTS NOTED AND REPEAT TESTS.WHEN THE ENTIRE SYSTEM HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND ALL LIGHTING FIXTURES INSTALLED, TEST ALL CIRCUITSAND SWITCHING TO DEMONSTRATE THAT THE OPERATION OF THE SYSTEM IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS.IN THE EVENT THAT THE CONTRACTOR DOES NOT, WITHIN A REASONABLE TIME, REMEDY ALL CONSTRUCTION,EQUIPMENT & OPERATIONAL DEFECTS SATISFACTORILY TO COMPLETE THE INSTALLATION, THE RIGHT ISRESERVED TO HAVE THE DEFECTS REMEDIED AND THE WORK COMPLETED AND TO HAVE THE COSTS CHARGEDTO THE ACCOUNT OF THE CONTRACTOR.CLEANING EQUIPMENT AND PREMISES: THOROUGHLY CLEAN ALL PARTS OF APPARATUS AND EQUIPMENT ANDPREMISES CONNECTED WITH THIS CONTRACT.UTILITY CONNECTIONS: OWNER SHALL PAY FOR AND ARRANGE ALL NECESSARY CONNECTIONS TO PUBLIC ANDPRIVATE UTILITIES.THE ARCHITECTURAL AND STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER THE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS INTHE REPRESENTATION OF THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION WORK AND THE DRAWINGS OF THE VARIOUS TRADESTAKE PRECEDENCE IN THE REPRESENTATION OF THE WORK OF THOSE TRADES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALLREFER TO ALL DWGS. TO COORDINATE THE ELECTRICAL WORK WITH THE WORK OF THE OTHER TRADES.IN CONDUIT RUNS WHERE AN EXCESSIVE NUMBER OF BENDS ARE REQUIRED THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BERESPONSIBLE FOR THE ADDITION OF PULL BOXES, OFFSETS, CONDUITS, ETC., TO COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE CODES.WIRE: TO BE COPPER AND SIZED PER CURRENT NECK AND THE LOCAL GOVERNING BODY,GROUNDS: PROVIDE AND INSTALL ALL GROUNDS PER CODE INCLUDING "UFER" GROUNDS FOR ALL ELECTRIC,TELEPHONE AND TELEVISION. N.E.C. ARTICLE 210-8.OUTLET BOXES: TO BE PER CODE.DUPLEX CONVENIENCE OUTLETS: GROUNDING TYPE THROUGHOUT WITH "BREAKOFF" SIDE TERMINALS: HUBBALL1101-1 OR EQUAL.DEVISE PLATES: SHALL BE IVORY PLASTIC, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS.INSTALLATION METHODS AND REQUIREMENTS: PLANS ARE DIAGRAMMATIC, INDICATING FUNCTION, CAPACITY AND APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS. CONTRACTOR SHALL CHECK OUTLET, RACEWAYS, EQUIPMENT AND FIXTURELOCATIONS ON THE JOB FOR COORDINATION WITH FINISH DETAILS AND WITH OTHER EQUIPMENT AND OUTLETS. 31 20 00 - EARTH MOVING
ALL GRADING SHALL BE CONDUCTED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE SOIL ENGINEER.GRADING PLAN AND GEOTECHNICAL DATA TO BE PROVIDED BY OWNER. SEE SECTION 01000 FOR GEOTECHNICALDATA.ANY FILL UNDER BUILDINGS AND PAVING AREAS SHALL BE COMPACTED TO A MINIMUM DENSITY OF 90% (ORMORE IF INDICATED IN SOILS INVESTIGATION}; ALL BACKFILLING IN TRENCHES SHALL BE COMPACTED OR SAND FILLED TO 90%; COMPACT TO A MINIMUM OF 5' -0" BEYOND EXTERIOR BUILDING WALLS.ALL GRADING SHALL BE DONE UNIFORMLY BETWEEN CONTROL ELEVATIONS AND SUCH THAT THE AREAS AREDRAINED AS INDICATED ON THE PLANS.ALL GRADED AREAS SHALL HAVE A TOLERANCE OF PLUS OR MINUS 0.10 FEET, BUT OVERALL AREAS SHALL HAVEA TOLERANCE OF ZERO.ALL GRADES AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE BUILDING SHALL SLOPE 5' AWAY FROM THE BUILDING TO INSURESUFFICIENT DRAINAGE AND TO PREVENT WATER FROM ENTERING THE BUILDING OR PONDING ADJACENT TOFOOTINGS AT A MINIMUM OF 2%.SHOULD THE CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTER, OR THE ENGINEER DISCOVER DURING THE PROGRESS OF THE WORK,SUBSURFACE AND/OR LATENT CONDITIONS MATERIALLY DIFFERING FROM THOSE INDICATED IN THE SOILREPORT, SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS, OR INDICATED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS, OR UNKNOWN CONDITIONS OF ANUNUSUAL NATURE DIFFERING MATERIALLY FROM THOSE ORDINARILY ENCOUNTERED AND GENERALLYRECOGNIZED AS INHERENT IN WORK OF THE CHARACTER PROVIDED FOR IN THE DRAWINGS ANDSPECIFICATIONS, THE ATTENTION OF THE ENGINEER SHALL BE CALLED IMMEDIATELY TO SUCH CONDITIONSBEFORE THEY ARE DISTURBED. CONDITIONS CAUSED BY ADVERSE WEATHER SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED"UNUSUAL CONDITIONS".MARK OUT SERVICE: UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA - 1-800-422-4133. LOCATE ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO EXCAVATIONS. EXISTING UTILITY LINES SUCH AS CABLES, DUCTS, CONDUITS, AND PIPINGSHALL, IF DAMAGED (UNLESS THEY ARE TO BE ABANDONED), BE IMMEDIATELY REPAIRED, PROTECTED, ANDMAINTAINED IN USE UNTIL RELOCATION OF SAME HAS BEEN COMPLETED, OR SHALL BE CUT AND CAPPED WHEREDIRECTED, OR SHALL BE PREPARED FOR SERVICE CONNECTIONS WHEN SO REQUIRED. 32 10 00 - BASES, BALLASTS, AND PAVING
WHERE ASPHALT PAVING IS INDICATED IN THE DRAWINGS: ALL PAVING TO BE AR-3000, MINIMUM 2" THICK HOTMIX ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVING WITH RS-1 SAND SEAL. ALL AREAS TO BE PAVED SHALL BE FIRST COVEREDWITH AN APPROVED WEED KILLER. INSTALLATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE OF CALIFORNIASTANDARDS. INSTALL CLASS ILL BASE UNDER A.C. PAVING (THICKNESS AS SPECIFIED IN SOILS REPORT). ALLPAVING TO PITCH FOR DRAINAGE, NO LOW SPOTS OR PONDING. 1 % MINIMUM SLOPE. INSTALL 2X4 REDWOODHEADERS, IF CALLED FOR IN PLANS. PROVIDE ADEQUATE TRAFFIC BARRIERS FOR A MINIMUM OF 24 HOURS.PRIOR TO PAVING, VERIFY WITH SOILS ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL OF PAVING MATERIALS AND BASE.WHERE CONCRETE PAVING IS INDICATED IN THE DRAWINGS: ALL PAVING TO BE MINIMUM 4 1 /2" THICK PORTLANDCEMENT CONCRETE WITH NONSKID BROOM FINISH. ALL AREAS TO BE PAVED SHALL BE FIRST COVERED WITH ANAPPROVED WEED KILLER. INSTALLATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE OF CALIFORNIA STANDARDS.

ALL FLATWORK SHALL BE AT LEAST 5" THICK. PROVIDE EXPANSION JOINTS IN ALL SLABS AT A MAXIMUM OF 20' -0"O.C., AND WEAKENED PLANE JOINTS AT 10' -0" O.C. LOCATE CONSTRUCTION AND EXPANSION JOINTS FORMINIMUM CRACKING (SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR EXACT THICKNESS AND JOINTING). NEW SIDEWALKS,CURBS AND DRIVEWAYS TO BE ACCORDING TO BUILDING DEPARTMENT REQUIREMENTS. INSTALL CLASS ILL BASE UNDER PAVING (THICKNESS AS RECOMMENDED BY THE SOIL ENGINEER). ALL PAVING TO PLAN FOR PITCHFOR DRAINAGE, NO LOW SPOTS OR PONDING. 0.5% MINIMUM SLOPE. SEE GRADING FINAL FINISH GRADES.PROVIDE ADEQUATE TRAFFIC BARRIERS FOR A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS. PRIOR TO PAVING, VERIFY WITH SOILSENGINEER FOR APPROVAL OF PAVING MATERIALS AND BASE. REINFORCE ALL CONCRETE DRIVEWAYS & FLATWORK W/6X6 6/6 W.W.F., OR AS SPECIFIED IN SOILS REPORT AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEER’S DRAWINGS. 32 14 43 - POROUS UNIT PAVING
INSTALL PAVING GRID SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH POROUS PAVING SYSTEM MANUFACTURE’SINSTRUCTIONS.PROVIDE TREATED WOOD, CONCRETE, STEEL OR PLASTIC CURB EDGE RETENTION AT PERIMETER OF POROUS PAVING SYSTEM AS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS.BEDDING LAYER: PROVIDE THE SAND SOIL, ROOT ZONE BEDDING LAYER 2” TO 2.75” THICK OVER PROPERLY PREPARED SUBGRADE. VERIFY IT IS LEVEL AND WELL CONSOLIDATED.PAVER PLACEMENT: PLACE PAVING GRIDS FIRMLY INTO THE SURFACE AND WITH THE TWO SETS OF EDGE LOOPCONNECTORS FACING IN DIRECTIONS OF LAYIING SO THAT THE GROUND SPIKES ARE PRESSED FULLY INTO THEBEDDING AND SO THE BASE OF THE PAVE CELLS SIT FLAT ON THE BEDDING LAYER SURFACE.CONNECT ADJACENT PAVERS TOGETHER BY SLOTTING THE EDGE CELL CONNECTORS DOWN INTO THE EDGELOOPS.CONTINUE TO PROGRESS OVER THE AREA IN ROWS.LOCK PAVERS IN PLACE WITH SNAP-FIT CLIPS.IF PAVER SEPARATION IS REQUIRED, CLIPS CAN BE DISLOCATED BY HAND OR SCREWDRIVER PRESSURE OR BY GENTLY TWISTING THE PAVER JOINTS.OFFSET PAVER GRIDS IN ONE CELL INCREMENTS OR CUT TO FIT AROUND OBSTRUCTIONS AND CURVES USING AHAND OR POWER SAW. DO NOT USE CUT PIECES, WHICH DO NOT HAVE INTEGRAL SNAP-FIT CONNECTORS.PAVER FILL SEED BED: APPLY 1.7” THICK LAYER OF ROOT ZONE PAVER FILL TO FILL PAVERS. FILL TO FINISHEDLEVELS: 0.2” BELOW TOP OF THE CELLS AFTER SETTLEMENT. A LIGHT TAMPER MAY BE USED TO CONSOLIDATETHE PAVERS AND SETTLE ROOT ZONE FILL. DO NOT OVER FILL OR OVER CONSOLIDATE.CARRY OUT A NORMAL SEEDING, FERTILIZING AND WATERING PROGRAM. A LIGHT TOP DRESSING MAY BEAPPLIED TO JUST COVER THE SEEND AND TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE GERMINATION CONDITIONS. DO NOT OVERFILLTHE PAVER CELLS. THIN-CUT OR WASHED TURF MAY BE LIGHTLY ROLLED INTO THE SURFACE AS AN ALTERNATEIF REQUIRED.THE SURFACE MAY BE USED FOR TRAFFIC IMMEDIATELY FOR CRITICAL ACCESS PURPOSES. ALLOW GRASS TOFULLY ESTABLISH PRIOR TO REGULAR USE.REGULARY MAINTAIN GRASS AS SPECIFIED.

AND DRIVEWAY
32 16 00 - CURBS, GUTTERS, SIDEWALKS
FLATWORK SHALL BE AT LEAST 4" THICK. PROVIDE EXPANSION JOINTS IN ALL WALKS AT A MINIMUM OF 1 O' -0"O.C., AND WEAKENED PLANE JOINTS AT 5' -0" O.C. LOCATE CONSTRUCTION AND EXPANSION JOINTS FOR MINIMUMOF CRACKING. NEW SIDEWALKS, CURBS AND DRIVEWAYS TO BE ACCORDING TO BUILDING DEPARTMENTREQUIREMENTS.WHEN WALKS EXCEED 5% GRADIENT (1 VERTICAL TO 20 HORIZONTAL) COMPLY WITH THE CURRENTREQUIREMENTS FOR A RAMP.CROSS SLOPES ON ALL WALKWAYS SHALL NOT EXCEED 1/4" IN 12". ALL WALKWAYS SHALL RECEIVE A NONSKIDBROOM FINISH--NO SMOOTH TROWELED FINISHES ON WALKWAYS!WALKS AND SIDEWALKS SHALL HAVE A CONTINUOUS COMMON SURFACE, NOT INTERRUPTED BY STEPS OR BYABRUPT CHANGES IN LEVEL EXCEEDING 1/4", AND SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 48 INCHES IN WIDTH.WALKS, SIDEWALKS AND PEDESTRIAN WAYS SHALL BE FREE OF GRATINGS WHENEVER POSSIBLE. FORGRATINGS LOCATED IN THE SURFACE OF ANY OF THESE AREAS, GRID OPENINGS IN GRATINGS SHALL BE LIMITED TO 1/2" IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC FLOW. ALL GRATINGS SHALL BE BICYCLE PROOF. 32 32 19 - UNIT MASONRY RETAINING WALLS
SEE SECTION 04200 FOR ADDITIONAL SPECIFICATIONS.CONCRETE MIX. THE MIX FOR THE CONCRETE USED FOR FOOTINGS SHALL BE PER STURCTURAL DRAWINGS.MORTAR MIX. THE MIX FOR BLOCK MORTAR SHALL BE PER STURCTURAL DRAWINGS.GROUT MIX. THE MIX FOR THE GROUT SHALL BE PER STURCTURAL DRAWINGS.ALL CELLS SHALL BE FILLED SOLID WITH GROUT.COLOR SHALL BE PER ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS.ROD OR VIBRATE GROUT WITHIN 10 MINUTES OF POURING TO INSURE SOLID CONSOLIDATION. BRING GROUT TOA POINT 2" FROM TOP OF MASONRY UNITS WHEN GROUTING OF SECOND LIFT IS TO BE CONTINUED AT ANOTHERTIME.MORTAR KEY. TO INSURE PROPER BONDING BETWEEN THE FOOTING AND THE FIRST COURSE OF BLOCK, AMORTAR KEY SHALL BE FORMED BY EMBEDDING A FLAT 2X4 FLUSH WITH AND AT THE TOP OF THE FRESHLYPOURED FOOTING. IT SHOULD BE REMOVED AFTER THE CONCRETE HAS STARTED TO HARDEN (APPROX. 1HOUR).HORIZONTAL STEEL SHALL BE PER STURCTURAL DRAWINGS.SOIL. ALL FOOTINGS SHALL BE PER STURCTURAL DRAWINGS AND SOILS REPORT.STEEL LAP. WHEN ONE CONTINUOUS BAR CANNOT BE USED, A LAP SHALL PER STURCTURAL DRAWINGS.DRAINAGE. PROVIDE WHERE INDICATED IN DRAWINGS. SEE SECTION 02710.WATERPROOFING. INSTALL WATERPROOFING ON RETAINED EARTH SIDE OF ALL RETAINING WALLS. SEE SECTION07100 AND 07190.CLEANOUTS. SHALL BE SAW-CUT. CAREFULLY REPLACE FACE SHELLS AND TAKE ADEQUATE MEASURES TOPREVENT BLOWOUTS DURING GROUTING.BACKFILL. BACKFILL A MINIMUM OF 7 DAYS AFTER WALL IS COMPLETED. BACKFILL SHALL BE COMPACTED BYMECHANICAL MEANS (BUT NOT BY BULLDOZERS OR SIMILAR EQUIPMENT) TO A MINIMUM OF 90% OF MAXIMUMDRY DENSITY. BRING THE FILL MATERIAL UP THE WALL AT A UNIFORM RATE AND NOT EXCEEDING 8" AT A TIME.DO NOT SUBJECT WALL TO IMPACT FORCES FROM EARTH, ROCK, OR CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT. PROVIDESHORING UNTIL BACKFILL IS COMPLETED.EXPANSION JOINTS. PROVIDE EXPANSION JOINTS AT A MAXIMUM OF 20' -0" O/C AND AT CHANGES IN WALL HEIGHTAND SHALL BE OF A TONGUE AND GROOVE TYPE. EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL EXTEND CONTINUOUSLY FROM TOPOF FOOTING TO TOP OF WALL. EVERY OTHER (50%) OF HORIZONTAL REINFORCEMENT SHALL BE CUT ATEXPANSION JOINTS. CAULK JOINTS.IF IT IS CONTRACTORS DESIRE TO STORE MATERIALS ON JOB SITE PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK,OWNER’S APPROVAL IS REQUIRED. CONTRACTOR WILL ASSUME COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR SAIDMATERIALS AND IF DAMAGED OR STOLLEN WILL REPLACE AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER. 33 46 13 - FOUNDATION DRAINAGE
DRAIN LINES SHALL BE ADS CORRUGATED TUBING AS MANUFACTURED BY ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, INC.,OR EQUIVALENT. SIZE AS INDICATED IN PLANS OR DETAILS. IF FOUNDATION IS LOCATED IN A ZERO LOT LINECONDITION, THEN TREMCO TREMDRAIN ALONG WITH TREMPROOF OR EQUIVALENT TO BE INSTALLED. PROVIDESAMPLES PER CONDITION TO OWNER FOR APPROVAL.INSTALLATION GUIDELINES: INSTALL PER MANUFACTURER’S RECOMMENDATIONS. CARE SHOULD BE TAKEN TOPREVENT DAMAGE TO THE TUBING OR MEMBRANE DURING THE BACKFILLING OPERATION. AVOID DROPPINGLARGE CLODS OR ROCKS DIRECTLY ON TUBING AND OR MEMBRANE. IMPACT LOADS OF ALL TYPES SHOULD BEAVOIDED UNTIL TUBING AND OR MEMBRAIN IS PROPERLY BEDDED. TUBING SHALL BE BEDDED IN A GRAVELENVELOPE. THE BEDDING MATERIAL SHOULD BE PLACED AROUND THE TUBING TO A DEPTH AT LEAST 2'' OVER THE TOP OF TUBING.IF VEHICULAR TRAFFIC IS EXPECTED OVER TUBING THERE SHOULD BE A MINIMUM OF 12" OF COVER OVER TUBING.ALL FOUNDATION DRAINS CONNECT TO SUMP PER SHEET AD-402. SEE SHEET A-003 FOR SUMP PUMP LOCATIONSIF IT IS CONTRACTORS DESIRE TO STORE MATERIALS ON JOB SITE PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK,OWNER’S APPROVAL IS REQUIRED. CONTRACTOR WILL ASSUME COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR SAIDMATERIALS AND IF DAMAGED OR STOLLEN WILL REPLACE AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER.

FILTRATION
33 46 26 - GEOTEXTILE SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE
SPECIFICATIONS: THE DRAINAGE ELEMENT FOR RETAINING WALLS SHALL BE ENKADRAIN WALL DRAINAGE MAT(TYPE 9120), MANUFACTURED BY AMERICAN ENKA COMPANY, ENKA, NORTH CAROLINA OR EQUIVALENT. THEPRODUCT SHALL BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS FOR UNDERGROUNDWALL AREA. TREMCO IS ALSO AN ALTERNATIVE. OWNER TO VERIFY.IF IT IS CONTRACTORS DESIRE TO STORE MATERIALS ON JOB SITE PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK,OWNER’S APPROVAL IS REQUIRED. CONTRACTOR WILL ASSUME COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR SAIDMATERIALS AND IF DAMAGED OR STOLLEN WILL REPLACE AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER. 09 90 00 - PAINTING AND COATING
METAL HANDRAILS AND FENCES: (IF ANY) 1-COAT SEMI-GLOSS BLACK RUSTOLEUM OVER SHOP PRIMER. MATCHWINDOW FRAMES. OWNER TO VERIFY.AT COMPLETION OF JOB PROVIDE OWNER WITH 1 GALLON OF PAINT OR STAIN OF EACH TYPE USED.EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SPECS. OWNER TO VERIFY ALL.TRIM AT EXTERIOR TO BE COORDINATED WITH OWNER.IF IT IS CONTRACTORS DESIRE TO STORE MATERIALS ON JOB SITE PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK,OWNER’S APPROVAL IS REQUIRED. CONTRACTOR WILL ASSUME COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR SAIDMATERIALS AND IF DAMAGED OR STOLLEN WILL REPLACE AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER. 22 00 00 - PLUMBING
SHOWERHEADS AND FAUCETS: NO SHOWERHEAD, LAVATORY FAUCET, OR SINK FAUCET THAT AS DEFINED IN THE CALIFORNIA STATE APPLIANCE EFFICIENCY REGULATIONS SHALL BE INSTALLED UNLESS CERTIFIED BY THEMANUFACTURER WITH THE CA. ENERGY COMMISSION.DAMPER CONTROLS: AIR LEAKAGE FROM EXHAUST FANS OR OTHER EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE PREVENTEDBY USING BACKDRAFT DAMPERS OR AUTOMATIC DAMPERS.PANS: ON ALL ATTIC OR ABOVE LIVING SPACE F.A.U.'S PROVIDE A PAN W/ DRAIN TO DAYLIGHT FORCONDENSATION.ISOLATION: IN ALL LOCATIONS WHERE EQUIPMENT IS SUPPORTED BY BUILDING FRAMING STRUCTURE- PROVIDEAN APPROVED ISOLATION PAD BENEATH THE F.A.U. 26 00 00 - ELECTRICAL

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR TO LOCATE AND CENTER METERS SO AS TO GIVE ADEQUATE CLEARANCES AS REQUIRED BY UTILITY. (3' - O" MIN.)ELECTRICIAN TO PROVIDE HOOKUP FOR ALL EQUIPMENT INCLUDING THAT WHICH MAY BE PROVIDED AND INSTALLED BY OTHERS.ELECTRICIAN TO PROVIDE AND INSTALL UNDERGROUND CONDUIT SWEEPS AS REQUIRED BY POWER, CABLE,AND TELEPHONE COMPANIES.UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, ALL SWITCHES TO BE 46" FROM FLOOR TO TOP OF BOX.ALL OUTSIDE LIGHTING SHALL BE INSTALLED ON LIGHTING CONTACTOR CONTROLLED BY 1800 WATTPHOTOELECTRIC CELL.TITLE 24 MANDATORY ENERGY CONSERVATION REQUIREMENTS: THE FOLLOWING ARE MINIMUM STANDARDSONLY AND DO NOT SUPERSEDE ANY MORE RESTRICTIVE STANDARDS FOUND IN THE PLANS OR SPECIFICATIONS.LIGHTING: GENERAL LIGHTING IN KITCHEN AND BATHROOMS MUST PROVIDE 25 LUMENS PER WATT OR MORE(E.G., FLUORESCENT). EXCEPTIONS: KITCHEN COUNTER OR SINK; DINING TABLE; BATHROOM MIRRORLUMINAIRES WHICH ARE THE ONLY LIGHTING.DAMPER CONTROLS: AIR LEAKAGE FROM EXHAUST FANS OR OTHER EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE PREVENTEDBY USING BACKDRAFT DAMPERS OR AUTOMATIC DAMPERS.IF IT IS CONTRACTORS DESIRE TO STORE MATERIALS ON JOB SITE PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK,OWNER’S APPROVAL IS REQUIRED. CONTRACTOR WILL ASSUME COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR SAIDMATERIALS AND IF DAMAGED OR STOLLEN WILL REPLACE AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER.

AND DRIVEWAY
32 16 00 - CURBS, GUTTERS, SIDEWALKS
ABRUPT CHANGES IN LEVEL ALONG ANY ACCESSIBLE ROUTE SHALL NOT EXCEED 1/2 INCH. WHEN CHANGES INLEVEL DO OCCUR, THEY SHALL BE BEVELED WITH A SLOPE NO GREATER THAN 1:2 EXCEPT THAT LEVEL CHANGES NOT EXCEEDING 1J4 INCH MAY BE VERTICAL.STAMPED CONCRETE: SHALL BE PATTERNED AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. COLOR SHALL BE AN INTEGRALCOLOR: L.M. SCOFIELD CO. 'CHROMIX' OR AS SELECTED BY OWNER. CONCRETE SLABS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF3000 PSI CONCRETE WITH MAXIMUM 3/8" AGGREGATE, 4" THICK, AND REINFORCED WITH 6X6 6/6 WELDED WIREFABRIC. PROVIDE EXPANSION JOINTS OF 1 /2" FELT AS REQUIRED, BUT NOT MORE THAN 20' IN ANY DIRECTION.

STEPS ON GRADE: WHERE INDICATED ON PLANS OR NECESSARY IN THE FIELD, PROVIDE STEPS ON GRADE PERDETAILS IN PLANS. MINIMUM OF TWO RISERS. WHERE ONLY ONE RISER IS REQUIRED, PROVIDE RAMP INSTEAD.PROVIDE HANDRAILS, PER PLANS, EACH SIDE OF STEPS. HANDRAILS SHALL EXTEND A MINIMUM OF 12-IN PLUS THE TREAD WIDTH BEYOND THE BOTTOM NOSING. ENDS SHALL BE RETURNED OR SHALL TERMINATE IN NEWELPOSTS OR SAFETY TERMINALS. TREADS SHALL HAVE SMOOTH, ROUNDED OR CHAMFERED EXPOSED EDGES, ANDNO ABRUPT EDGES AT THE NOSING (LOWER FRONT EDGE). NOSINGS SHALL NOT PROJECT MORE THAN 1-1 /2 "PAST THE FACE OF THE RISER BELOW.RAMPS: THE SLOPE OF A RAMP SHALL NOT EXCEED 1 IN 12. HANDRAILS SHALL BE PLACED ON EACH SIDE OFEACH RAMP AND SHALL EXTEND 12 INCHES BEYOND THE TOP AND BOTTOM OF THE RAMP. SURFACES OF RAMPSSHALL BE NONSKID.

REVISION SCHEDULE
# DESCRIPTION DATE

Page 162 of 615 ends

Drawn by
Reviewed by
1 D Project number
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER:GENERAL CONTRACTOR:OWNER:

Robert Traylor3664 Charles St.San Diego, CA 92106
InDev + Design, INC © 2014 All Rights Reserved
InDev, Inc.2605 State St. San Diego, CA 92103Phone: 619 580-0201CSLB# 971403DESIGNED BY:

CBA
2 3
4 5
1 2
3 4
5 09172020
AB
ZS/CG
SOILS ENGINEER:TBDADDRESSCITY, CA 90000PHONE:PROJECT NAME:The Bird House AD-105
5/4/2022 1:59:39 PM SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATIONS INDEX

CSI SECTION TITLE
01 00 00 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS03 00 00 CONCRETE04 20 00 UNIT MASONRY06 10 00 ROUGH CARPENTRY06 20 00 FINISH CARPENTRY06 41 00 ARCHITECTURAL WOOD CASEWORK07 10 00 DAMPROOFING AND WATERPROOFING07 19 00 WATER REPELLENTS07 21 00 THERMAL INSULATION07 50 00 MEMBRANE ROOFING07 60 00 FLASHING AND SHEET METAL07 90 00 JOINT PROTECTION08 50 00 WINDOWS09 20 00 PLASTER AND GYPSUM BOARD09 29 00 GYPSUM BOARD09 60 00 FLOORING09 68 00 CARPETING09 90 00 PAINTING AND COATING10 30 00 FIREPLACES AND STOVES22 00 00 PLUMBING23 00 00 HVAC26 00 00 ELECTRICAL31 20 00 EARTH MOVING32 10 00 BASES, BALLASTS, AND PAVING32 14 43 POROUS UNIT PAVING32 16 00 CURBS, GUTTERS, SIDEWALKS AND DRIVEWAY32 32 19 UNIT MASONRY RETAINING WALLS33 46 13 FOUNDATION DRAINAGE33 46 26 GEOTEXTILE SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE FILTRATION 01 00 00 - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
THE WORD "OWNER" REFERS TO THE OWNER AS INDICATED ON THE COVER SHEET UNDER THE CONTACT LIST.THE WORD “CONTRACTOR" REFERS TO THE SUBCONTRACTORS OF THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR, AND THEIRSUPPLIERS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE HERIN OR IN INDIVIDUAL CONTRACTS BETWEEN THE GENERALCONTRACTOR AND THE SUBCONTRACTOR.ALL WORK: EXECUTE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE SPECIFICATIONS AND THE DRAWINGS AND ANY OTHERADDENDA ISSUED BY OWNER.THE CONTRACTOR IS TO FURNISH ALL MATERIALS AND LABOR NECESSARY FOR THE COMPLETE ANDSUBSTANTIAL EXECUTION OF EVERYTHING DESCRIBED, SHOWN OR IMPLIED IN THE DRAWINGS ANDSPECIFICATIONS, INCLUDING ALL TRANSPORTATION, SCAFFOLDING APPARATUS AND MATERIALS REQUIRED FORTHE SAME. ALL WORKMANSHIP TO BE OF THE BEST QUALITY OF THE TRADE.ALL CONTRACTORS SHALL CONFORM TO ALL REQUIREMENTS OF LOCAL CODES, RULES AND REGULATIONS OFAGENCIES HAVING JURISDICTION INCLUDING "OSHA" REGULATIONS.THE CONTRACTOR MUST KEEP A COMPETENT FOREMAN ON THE JOB AND HE MUST SET OUT HIS WORKCORRECTLY AND BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY MISTAKES HE MAY MAKE AND FOR ANY INJURIESRESULTING THEREFROM.THE CONTRACTOR IS TO GIVE THE AUTHORITIES ALL REQUIRED NOTICES RELATING TO WORK IN HIS CHARGE,OBTAIN OFFICIAL PERMITS AND PAY ALL PROPER FEES FOR THE SAME.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COOPERATE AND COORDINATE HIS WORK WITH ALL OTHER TRADES AS MAY BENECESSARY FOR THE PROPER EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PROTECTION NECESSARY TO PRESERVE THE WORK AND INSTALLATIONS OFHIS AND OTHER TRADES UNDER THIS CONTRACT AND SHALL REPAIR AND/OR REPLACE ALL WORK DAMAGES TOHIS OR OTHER TRADES, AND HOLD THE OWNER FREE FROM ANY COSTS AND LIABILITIES IN CONNECTIONTHEREWITH.DURING THE PROGRESS OF THE WORK, THE PREMISES SHALL BE KEPT FREE FROM ALL DEBRIS AND WASTEMATERIALS RESULTING FROM EACH CONTRACTOR'S WORK. ALL SUCH DEBRIS AND RUBBISH SHALL BE REMOVEDFROM THE SITE AND WORK AREA SHALL BE LEFT BROOM CLEAN.ALL MATERIALS SHALL BE NEW, FREE FROM DEFECT AND OF QUALITY AND RATING INDICATED OR SPECIFIED.THE ENTIRE INSTALLATION SHALL BE MADE IN A NEAT, FINISHED AND SAFE MANNER WITH COMPETENTWORKMANSHIP THROUGHOUT AND UNDER THOROUGH AND QUALIFIED SUPERVISION ALL TIMES. THEINSTALLATIONS SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION AND DAMAGED MATERIAL AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE REPLACED AT NO COST TO OWNER.ORDER MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT PRIOR TO TIME OF INSTALLATION AS TO NOT DELAY CONSTRUCTION.PREPARE SAMPLES, SCHEDULES AND OTHER DATA. OBTAIN OWNER'S APPROVAL IN AMPLE TIME BEFORENEEDED, SO AS NOT TO CAUSE DELAYS IN THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK.ARRANGE ORDER OF WORK SO AS NOT TO CAUSE INTERFERENCE OR DELAYS WITH OTHER TRADES.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE LICENSED TO PERFORM THE WORK OUTLINED, TO BE FAMILIAR WITH ALL LOCALCODES HAVING JURISDICTION; AND, TO HAVE REVIEWED THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND VERIFIEDTHAT ALL SYSTEMS CONTAINED THEREON ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THOSE CODES HAVING JURISDICTION. THECONTRACTOR SHALL CAREFULLY EXAMINE THE BUILDING SITE AND COMPARE WITH THE DRAWINGS. HE WILL,FURTHER, VERIFY ALL UTILITY REQUIREMENTS WITH THE PROPER UTILITY COMPANIES INVOLVED. BY THE ACT OF

SUBMITTING A BID, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE DEEMED TO HAVE ACCEPTED SUCH CONDITIONS ANDRESPONSIBILITIES, AND TO HAVE MADE ALLOWANCES THEREFORE IN PREPARING HIS FIGURE SO THAT THERE WILL BE NO ADDITIONAL COSTS REQUESTED FOR ANY ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MADE BY THOSE AGENCIESHAVING JURISDICTION.LIENS: NEITHER THE FINAL PAYMENT NOR ANY PART OF THE RETAINED PERCENTAGE SHALL BECOME DUE UNTILTHE CONTRACTOR HAS DELIVERED TO OWNER A COMPLETE RELEASE OF ALL LIENS ARISING OUT OF THISCONTRACT. IF ANY LIEN REMAINS UNSATISFIED AFTER ALL PAYMENTS ARE MADE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALLREFUND TO OWNER ALL MONIES THAT THE LADDER MAY BE COMPELLED TO PAY IN DISCHARGING SUCH A LIEN,INCLUDING ALL COSTS AND A REASONABLE ATTORNEY’S FEE.ASSIGNMENT: NO PARTY OF THE CONTRACT SHALL ASSIGN THE CONTRACT OR SUBLET IT AS A WHOLE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF OWNER.SEPARATE CONTRACTS: OWNER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO LET OTHER CONTRACTS IN CONNECTION WITH THIS WORK UNDER SIMILAR GENERAL CONDITIONS.INSTALLATION OF MANUFACTURED ITEMS: INSTALLATION OF MANUFACTURED ITEMS SHALL BE AS PERMANUFACTURER'S DIRECTIONS AND STANDARD PRACTICEWORK AND MATERIALS: DURING THE PROGRESS OF THE WORK, ANY MATERIALS DELIVERED OR WORK EXECUTED NOT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND IF OVERRULLED BY A CITYBUILDING INSPECTOR, MUST BE REMOVED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE AND BE REPLACED BY OTHERMATERIAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS OR REPLACED WITH MATERIAL INACCORDANCE WITH CITY INSPECTOR MANDATED REQUIREMENT OR CHANGE.THE FOLLOWING MATERIALS ARE NOT APPROVED FOR USE IN THIS PROJECT: ASBESTOS OR PRODUCTSCONTAINING ASBESTOS; UREA-FORMALDEHYDE FOAM INSULATION; OR POLYBUTYLENE PIPE.SHOP DRAWINGS: WHERE SHOP DRAWINGS, SAMPLES OR OTHER SUBMITTALS ARE REQUIRED, FIVE (5) OF EACHSHALL BE SUBMITTED, THREE (3) OF WHICH WILL BE RETURNED TO THE CONTRACTOR. ALLOW ONE WEEKCHECKING TIME BY THE OWNER OR HIS REPRESENTATIVE.APPROVAL OF SHOP DRAWINGS MEANS APPROVAL OF GENERAL METHOD OF FABRICATION ONLY. DIMENSIONSAND QUANTITIES MAY NOT BE CHECKED, AND APPROVAL OF SHOP DRAWINGS DOES NOT RELIEVE THECONTRACTOR FROM COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS UNLESSSPECIFICALLY SO INDICATED IN THE APPROVAL. CODE COMPLIANCE WILL ALWAYS DICTATE.DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS: THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE COOPERATIVE AND WORKNECESSARY FOR THE COMPLETION OF THE DESIGN AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND NOT DESCRIBED HEREIN,AND WORK DESCRIBED HEREIN BUT NOT SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS ALONG WITH ANY SCOPE OF WORK ISSUEDAS PART OF A SUBCONTRACT, IS TO BE CONSIDERED A PORTION OF THE CONTRACT AND MUST BE EXECUTEDTHE SAME AS IF BOTH WERE SHOWN AND SPECIFIED.IN THE CASE WHERE TWO OR MORE DETAILS APPLYING TO THE SAME PART OF THE WORK ARE IN CONFLICT, THE MOST RESTRICTIVE SHALL GOVERN UNLESS CLARIFIED OR OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE OWNER OR HISREPRESENTATIVE IN WRITING.THE ARCHITECT HAS NOT BEEN RETAINED FOR SUPERVISION OR INSPECTIONS, BUT WILL RESOLVE IN WRITINGITEMS BROUGHT TO HIS ATTENTION. THE ARCHITECT SHALL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERBAL INSTRUCTIONS.GEOTECHNICAL DATA: IS PROVIDED ONLY FOR INFORMATION AND CONVENIENCE OF BIDDERS. THE OWNER ANDTHE ARCHITECT DISCLAIM ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR ACCURACY, TRUE LOCATION AND EXTENT OF SOILSINVESTIGATION THAT HAS BEEN PREPARED BY OTHERS. THEY FURTHER DISCLAIM RESPONSIBILITY FORINTERPRETATION OF THAT DATA BY BIDDERS; AS IN PROJECTING SOIL -BEARING VALUES, ROCK PROFILES, SOILSTABILITY, AND PRESENCE, LEVEL AND EXTENT OF UNDERGROUND WATER.A COPY OF THE REPORT, IF ANY, IS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW AT THE ONCE OF THE ARCHITECT. BIDDERS ARE URGED TO EXAMINE GEOTECHNICAL DATA AND TO MAKE THEIR OWN INVESTIGATION OF THE SITE BEFOREBIDDING.EXTRA WORK: OWNER MAY ORDER EXTRA WORK DONE, ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS, BY GIVING CONTRACTORAUTHORIZATION IN WRITING OR VERBAL. ALL EXTRA WORK ORDERED BY OWNER SHALL BE GOVERNED BY THECONTRACT BETWEEN GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTOR.

INSURANCE: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CARRY "CONTRACTOR’S LIABILITY INSURANCE", THE MINIMUM LIMITS OFLIABILITY SHALL BE AS REQUIRED BY THE OWNER.BODILY INJURY - AS REQUIRED BY OWNERPROPERTY DAMAGE - AS REQUIRED BY OWNERCONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE OWNER WITH CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE FOR AMOUNTS REQUIRED BY OWNER ANDCERTIFICATE OF WORKMAN'S COMPENSATION.COMPLETION: UPON COMPLETION OF THE CONTRACT AND AT THE END OF A DAY’S WORK ON SITE, ALLCONTRACTORS SHALL REMOVE THEIR RUBBISH, LEAVING THE SITE RAKED CLEAN. ALL WINDOWS SHALL BECLEANED OF ALL PAINT AND PUTTY STAINS. ALL HARDWARE. LIGHT FIXTURES, ETC., TO BE CLEANED. ALLCONTRACTORS TO LEAVE BUILDING "BROOM CLEAN" AND COMPLETE IN EVERY RESPECT, AND REMOVE ALLDEBRIS, RUBBISH, LEFTOVER MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT FROM THE SITE.CODES AND ORDINANCES SHALL BE CONSIDERED AS MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS AND SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCEOVER SPECIFICATION REQUIREMENTS WHICH INADVERTENTLY ARE WRITTEN CONTRARY TO CODE.SPECIFICATIONS EXCEEDING CODE REQUIREMENTS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER CODE.

THE CONTRACTORS SHALL TAKE OUT AND PAY FOR ALL PERMITS REQUIRED. WATER, GAS, ELECTRIC,IRRIGATION, THE CUTTING OF CURBS, FENCES, WALLS, POOL, SPA, DRIVEWAYS, ETC., PLUS ALL TEMPORARYPERMITS THAT MAY BE REQUIRED, AND ANY OTHER FEES REQUIRED FOR THIS CONTRACT.

OWNER SHALL MAKE ALL APPLICATIONS AND PAY ALL FEES FOR GAS AND WATER AND POWER.OWNER’S CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE IS ALSO A PART OF THESE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS.GUARANTEE: BESIDES GUARANTEES REQUIRED ELSEWHERE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL GUARANTEE ALL WORKAGAINST DEFECTS IN MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR AFTER THE DATE OFACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK BY OWNER AND NOTICE OF COMPLETION IS SIGNED ALONG WITH THE BUILDING’SCERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FROM THE GOVERNING BODY.COLORS: ALL COLORS AND FINISHES SHALL BE AS SELECTED BY OWNER. CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT ALL SAMPLESFOR OWNER'S SELECTIONS.INFORMATION TO BIDDERS: EXAMINE SITE AND ALL CONDITIONS THEREON. BID SHALL TAKE INTOCONSIDERATION ALL SITE CONDITIONS AS MAY AFFECT WORK. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALLDIMENSIONS AND JOB CONDITIONS RELATING TO THE PERFORMANCE OF HIS WORK.SHOULD ANY DISCREPANCIES, OMISSIONS, AMBIGUITIES OR OTHER CONFLICTS IN OR AMONG CONTRACTDOCUMENTS BE FOUND, OR IF THERE IS DOUBT AS TO THEIR MEANING, BRING QUESTIONS TO ATTENTION OFOWNER BEFORE BID IS SUBMITTED. CLARIFYING ADDENDUM WILL BE ISSUED AND SHALL BECOME A PART OFTHESE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE OWNER ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ORAL INSTRUCTIONS.SHOULD ANY CONDITION ARISE WHERE THE INTENT OF THE DRAWINGS IS IN DOUBT OR DRAWINGS AND FIELDCONDITIONS, THE OWNER SHALL BE NOTIFIED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE FOR PROCEDURE TO BE FOLLOWED. IF THECONTRACTOR PROCEEDS WITH THE WORK SO AFFECTED WITHOUT INSTRUCTIONS FROM THE OWNER, THECONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE GOOD ANY RESULTING DAMAGE OR DEFECTS AT THE CONTRACTOR’S SOLE COST.THIS INCLUDES TYPOGRAPHICAL ERRORS IN THE SPECIFICATIONS AND NOTATIONAL ERRORS ON THE DRAWINGSWHERE DOUBTFUL OF INTERPRETATION.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CAREFULLY EXAMINE THE CONDITIONS AFFECTING HIS WORK BEFORE PROCEEDING,AND SHALL REPORT TO THE OWNER ANY CONDITION WHICH WOULD PREVENT THE PROPER AND LEGALCOMPLETION OF HIS WORK. NOT REPORTING ANY SUCH UNSUITABLE CONDITION WILL CONSTITUTEACCEPTANCE OF ALL CONDITIONS BY THE CONTRACTOR.OWNER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REJECT ANY OR ALL BIDS, OR TO WAIVE ANY IRREGULARITIES ORINFORMALITIES IN ANY BID OR IN BIDDING. 03 00 00 - CONCRETE
IF IT IS CONTRACTORS DESIRE TO STORE MATERIALS ON JOB SITE PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK,OWNER’S APPROVAL IS REQUIRED. CONTRACTOR WILL ASSUME COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR SAIDMATERIALS AND IF DAMAGED OR STOLLEN WILL REPLACE AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER.SEE SECTION 02510 FOR FLATWORK, WALKS AND SIDEWALKS.ALL WORK INCLUDED UNDER THIS CONTRACT TO BE THE EXCAVATION FOR ALL FOOTINGS TO THE SIZES ANDSHAPES AS SHOWN ON PLANS. ALL EXCAVATION TO BE BACK-FILLED WHEN JOB IS FINISHED. TRENCHES SHALLNOT BE LESS THAN EIGHTEEN INCHES BELOW NATURAL GRADE OR AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. GRADE ALLSURPLUS FOOTING DIRT AWAY FROM BUILDING. PROVIDE PER STRUCTURAL AND SOILS REPORT.THIS CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT THE SITE, THE FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION REPORT, THE REQUIREMENTSOF THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AND OTHERWISE INFORM HIMSELF OF THE CONDITIONS AFFECTING HISWORK AND HIS SUBMISSION OF A BID SHALL BE INDICATIVE OF THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE SITE CONDITIONS.INSTALL ALL REINFORCING STEEL FOR FOOTINGS AND BLOCK RETAINING WALLS.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PROTECTION NECESSARY TO PRESERVE THE WORK OF OTHERS AND KEEP FREEFROM DAMAGE DUE TO CONCRETE OPERATIONS. REMOVE ALL SURPLUS AND OVER SPILL CONCRETE FROMPLANTERS AND PARKING AREAS.SEE THAT INSERTS AND OPENINGS IN CONCRETE WORK ARE PROVIDED FOR, BEFORE POURING.FURNISH AND PLACE ALL FOUNDATION BOLTS AND NUTS, PLACE ALL MISC. SADDLE, ETC.ALL FOOTINGS SHALL BEAR IN UNDISTURBED NATURAL SOIL OR APPROVED COMPACTED SOIL AT MINIMUMDEPTH AS SHOWN IN DETAILS BELOW FINISH GRADE. ALL CONCRETE FOOTINGS SHALL BE CONTINUOUS ANDREINFORCED PER FOUNDATION DETAILS.SEE GEOTECHNICAL DATA (SOILS REPORT) INDICATED IN SECTION 01000.SOIL BEARING VALUE USED IN DESIGN IS PER SOILS REPORT. SEE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS BY THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER.TESTS AND INSPECTIONS AS CALLED FOR IN THE FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION, SHALL BE CARRIED OUTTHROUGHOUT THE COURSE OF THIS WORK BY A FOUNDATION ENGINEER ACCEPTABLE TO THE OWNER. THECOST OF SUCH TESTS WILL BE BORNE BY THE OWNER. COPIES OF ALL TEST REPORTS SHALL BE DISTRIBUTEDTO THE OWNER, ARCHITECT, CONTRACTOR, AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT.BACKFILLING SHALL NOT BEGIN UNTIL ALL FORMWORK AND DEBRIS HAVE BEEN REMOVED AND UNTIL ADEQUATELATERAL SUPPORT FOR THE WALL BEING BACKFILLED HAS BEEN PROVIDED (EXCEPT WALLS DESIGNED ASFREESTANDING RETAINING WALLS) AND SHALL BE PLACED IN LAYERS NOT EXCEEDING 8" IN DEPTH ANDCOMPACTED AS FOR FILLING USING HAND OR PNEUMATIC TAMPER. COMPACTION OF EACH LAYER SHALL BEGIN AT THE WALL AND WORK AWAY FROM THE WALL TO PREVENT WEDGING OF THE WALL.CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 2500 PSI AT 28 DAYS. THE SLUMP OF THECONCRETE SHALL BE THE MINIMUM THAT IS PRACTICABLE. THE SLUMP SHALL NOT EXCEED 4", VERIFY WITH SOILS REPORT AND STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS.THE MAXIMUM SIZE OF THE AGGREGATE SHALL BE NOT LARGER THAN ONE-FIFTH OF THE NARROWESTDIMENSION BETWEEN SIDES OF THE FORMS WITHIN WHICH THE CONCRETE IS TO BE CAST NOT LARGER THANTHREE-FOURTHS OF THE MINIMUM CLEAR SPACING BETWEEN REINFORCING BARS, OR BETWEEN REINFORCINGBARS AND FORMS. FOR UNREINFORCED SLABS, THE MAXIMUM SIZE OF AGGREGATE SHALL NOT BE LARGERTHAN ONE-THIRD THE SLAB THICKNESS.READY MIXED CONCRETE SHALL BE MIXED AND DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS SETFORTH IN THE "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR READY MIXED CONCRETE" ASTM C94.ALL SLABS ON GRADE SHALL HAVE CONTRACTION JOINTS AT NOT MORE THAN 20' -0" APART. THESE JOINTS MAYBE A POUR JOINT WITH AT LEAST TWO HOURS BETWEEN ABUTTING POURS, OR A 3/ 4" DEEP SAWED JOINTPROVIDED THE JOINT IS SAWED THE SAME DAY THE SLAB IS POURED, OR A WEAKENED JOINT MADE BY A STRIPOF PLASTIC EMBEDDED 1-1 /2 " MINIMUM INTO THE SLAB.ALL BUILDING SLABS (UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED) SHALL HAVE A STEEL TROWEL FINISH AND BE LEVEL TOWITHIN 1 /8" IN ANY TEN FEET.SLABS SHALL BE CURED BY KEEPING CONTINUOUSLY WET FOR FOUR DAYS AFTER POURING OR BY SEALINGSURFACE WITH A SEALER APPROVED BY THE TILE COUNCIL OF AMERICA, INC., FOR FUTURE TILE INSTALLATION.THIS IS THE DIRECT RESPONCIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR PEROFMING THE SLAB WORK.ALL EXPOSED SURFACES SHALL BE FORMED WITH SANDED PLYWOOD, AND ANY FINS OR OTHER PROJECTIONS SHALL BE REMOVED. ANY VOIDS SHALL BE FILLED. THE ENTIRE SURFACE SHALL BE "SACKED" TO PROVIDE A UNIFORM, ATTRACTIVE FINISH.REINFORCING STEEL: REINFORCING STEEL TO CONFORM TO ASTM STANDARD A-615 AND ALL BARS SHALL BEINTERMEDIATE GRADE OR HARD GRADE STEEL, DEFORMED, HI-BOND TYPE, LAPPED A MINIMUM OF 40DIAMETERS OR 24" (WHICHEVER IS GREATER) AT ALL SPLICES, CORNERS, AND INTERSECTIONS. THOROUGHLYCLEAN OFF ALL RUST, ACCURATELY POSITION AND SECURE IN PLACE WITH 16 GA. ANNEALED WIRE. METALCHAINS OR CONCRETE BLOCKS SHALL BE USED TO SPACE STEEL AT BOTTOM. THIS IS THE MINIMUMREQUIREMNT AND THE REINFORCING STEEL MUST MEET THE SPECIFICATIONS LISTED OUT ON THE STRUCURAL DRAWINGS.EXCEPT WHERE INDICATED OTHERWISE, ALL REINFORCING SHALL BE BENT AND PLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITHTHE "CODE OF STANDARD PRACTICE AND THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR PLACING REINFORCING STEEL OF THECONCRETE REINFORCING STEEL INSTITUTE".MINIMUM CLEAR DISTANCE BETWEEN BARS SHALL BE 1-1 /2 ''.WELDED WIRE MESH SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A 185.MINIMUM CONCRETE COVERAGE OF BARS SHALL BE 3" WHERE CONCRETE IS POURED AGAINST EARTH; 2" WHEREFORMED BUT IN CONTACT WITH EARTH; 1-1 /2" IN WALLS, BEAMS AND COLUMNS; AND 3/4" FOR FORMED SLABS,VERIFY WITH STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. WHERE THERE IS A DISCREPANCY, THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS WILLRULE.BOLT INSERTS IN EXISTING CONCRETE: SHALL BE OF THE SELF-DRILLING EXPANSION TYPE AS MANUFACTUREDBY PHILIPS DRILL CO., WEJIT, OR EQUIVALENT AS APPROVED BY THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER AND BUILDINGDEPARTMENT. INSERTS MUST HAVE L.C.B.O. APPROVAL.ALL INTERIOR SLABS ON GRADE SHALL HAVE EXPANSION JOINTS AT NOT MORE THAN 60' -0" APART, AND 40' -0"APART FOR EXTERIOR SLABS AND FLATWORK. THESE JOINTS SHALL BE 1 /2" WIDE AND CONSIST OF A 1 /2"PREFORMED EXPANSION JOINT FILLER THROUGHOUT THE JOINT BEGINNING AT 1 /2" BELOW TOP OF SLAB. ASEALANT SHALL BE PLACE ON TOP OF THE EXPANSION FILLER. 04 20 00 - UNIT MASONRY
SEE SECTION 04200 FOR ADDITIONAL SPECIFICATIONS.CONCRETE MIX. THE MIX FOR THE CONCRETE USED FOR FOOTINGS SHALL BE PER STURCTURAL DRAWINGS.MORTAR MIX. THE MIX FOR BLOCK MORTAR SHALL BE PER STURCTURAL DRAWINGS.GROUT MIX. THE MIX FOR THE GROUT SHALL BE PER STURCTURAL DRAWINGS.ALL CELLS SHALL BE FILLED SOLID WITH GROUT.COLOR SHALL BE PER ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS.ROD OR VIBRATE GROUT WITHIN 10 MINUTES OF POURING TO INSURE SOLID CONSOLIDATION. BRING GROUT TOA POINT 2" FROM TOP OF MASONRY UNITS WHEN GROUTING OF SECOND LIFT IS TO BE CONTINUED AT ANOTHERTIME.MORTAR KEY. TO INSURE PROPER BONDING BETWEEN THE FOOTING AND THE FIRST COURSE OF BLOCK, AMORTAR KEY SHALL BE FORMED BY EMBEDDING A FLAT 2X4 FLUSH WITH AND AT THE TOP OF THE FRESHLYPOURED FOOTING. IT SHOULD BE REMOVED AFTER THE CONCRETE HAS STARTED TO HARDEN (APPROX. 1HOUR).HORIZONTAL STEEL SHALL BE PER STURCTURAL DRAWINGS.SOIL. ALL FOOTINGS SHALL BE PER STURCTURAL DRAWINGS AND SOILS REPORT.STEEL LAP. WHEN ONE CONTINUOUS BAR CANNOT BE USED, A LAP SHALL PER STURCTURAL DRAWINGS.DRAINAGE. PROVIDE WHERE INDICATED IN DRAWINGS. SEE SECTION 02710.WATERPROOFING. INSTALL WATERPROOFING ON RETAINED EARTH SIDE OF ALL RETAINING WALLS. SEE SECTION07100 AND 07190.CLEANOUTS. SHALL BE SAW-CUT. CAREFULLY REPLACE FACE SHELLS AND TAKE ADEQUATE MEASURES TOPREVENT BLOWOUTS DURING GROUTING.BACKFILL. BACKFILL A MINIMUM OF 7 DAYS AFTER WALL IS COMPLETED. BACKFILL SHALL BE COMPACTED BYMECHANICAL MEANS (BUT NOT BY BULLDOZERS OR SIMILAR EQUIPMENT) TO A MINIMUM OF 90% OF MAXIMUMDRY DENSITY. BRING THE FILL MATERIAL UP THE WALL AT A UNIFORM RATE AND NOT EXCEEDING 8" AT A TIME.DO NOT SUBJECT WALL TO IMPACT FORCES FROM EARTH, ROCK, OR CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT. PROVIDESHORING UNTIL BACKFILL IS COMPLETED.EXPANSION JOINTS. PROVIDE EXPANSION JOINTS AT A MAXIMUM OF 20' -0" O/C AND AT CHANGES IN WALL HEIGHTAND SHALL BE OF A TONGUE AND GROOVE TYPE. EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL EXTEND CONTINUOUSLY FROM TOPOF FOOTING TO TOP OF WALL. EVERY OTHER (50%) OF HORIZONTAL REINFORCEMENT SHALL BE CUT ATEXPANSION JOINTS. CAULK JOINTS.IF IT IS CONTRACTORS DESIRE TO STORE MATERIALS ON JOB SITE PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK,OWNER’S APPROVAL IS REQUIRED. CONTRACTOR WILL ASSUME COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR SAIDMATERIALS AND IF DAMAGED OR STOLLEN WILL REPLACE AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER. 06 10 00 - ROUGH CARPENTRY
WALL BRACING: EVERY EXTERIOR WOOD STUD WALL AND MAIN CROSS PARTITION SHALL BE BRACED AT EACHEND AND AT LEAST EVERY 25 FEET OF LENGTH WITH 1 X4 DIAGONAL LET-IN BRACES OR EQUIVALENT.

FIRE STOPS SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS:A. IN CONCEALED SPACES OF STUD WALLS AND PARTITIONS, INCLUDING FURRED SPACES, AT THE CEILING ANDFLOOR LEVELS AND AT 1 Q' INTERVALS ALONG THE LENGTH OF THE WALL; (EXCEPTION: FIRE STOPS MAY BEOMITTED AT FLOOR AND CEILING LEVELS WHEN APPROVED SMOKE-ACTUATED FIRE DAMPERS ARE INSTALLED ATTHESE LEVELS.)B. AT ALL INTERCONNECTIONS BETWEEN CONCEALED VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL SPACES SUCH AS OCCURS ATSOFFITS, DROP CEILINGS AND COVE CEILINGS;C. IN CONCEALED SPACES BETWEEN STAIR STRINGERS AT THE TOP AND BOTTOM OF THE RUN AND BETWEENSTUDS ALONG AND IN LINE WITH THE RUN OF STAIRS IF THE WALLS UNDER THE STAIRS ARE UNFINISHED;D. IN OPENINGS AROUND VENTS, PIPES, DUCTS, CHIMNEYS, FIREPLACES AND SIMILAR OPENINGS WHICH AFFORDTHE PASSAGE OF FIRE AT FLOOR AND CEILING LEVELS, WITH NONCOMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS.FIRE STOP CONSTRUCTION: EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN D ABOVE. FIRE STOPPING SHALL CONSIST OF 2 INCHESNOMINAL LUMBER OR TWO THICKNESSES OF 1-INCH NOMINAL LUMBER WITH BROKEN LAP JOINTS OR ONE THICKNESS OF 3/4" PLYWOOD WITH JOINTS BACKED WITH ONE THICKNESS OF 3/4" PLYWOOD.FIRE STOPS MAY ALSO BE OF GYPSUM BOARD, CEMENT BOARD, MINERAL WOOL OR OTHER APPROVEDMATERIALS SECURELY FASTENED IN PLACE. WALLS HAVING PARALLEL OR STAGGERED STUDS FOR SOUNDTRANSMISSION CONTROL SHALL HAVE FIRE STOPS OF MINERAL WOOL OR OTHER NON-RIGID MATERIAL.PLYWOOD COMBINATION SUBFLOOR-UNDERLAYMENT: 3/4" CD-X D.F. {P.I. 42/20) PLYWOOD FLOOR SHEATHINGWITH JOINTS STAGGERED AND LAID WITH FACE GRAIN PERPENDICULAR TO JOISTS. PLYWOOD SHALL BE T&G ORALL JOINTS SHALL BE BLOCKED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS. NAILING AROUND PERIMETEROF SHEETS SHALL BE AS CALLED FOR ON THE DRAWINGS.ROOF SHEATHING: 3/4'' CD-X D.F. {P.I. 42/20) PLYWOOD ROOF SHEATHING SHALL BE WITH JOINTS STAGGERED ANDLAID WITH FACE GRAIN PERPENDICULAR TO RAFTERS OR JOISTS. NAILING AROUND PERIMETER OF SHEETS SHALL BE AS CALLED FOR ON THE DRAWINGS.RAFTERS AND JOISTS MAY BE NOTCHED OR BORED PER STURCTURAL DRAWINGS. (BJI O.K. TO USE PERSTRUCTURAL)PROVIDE DOUBLE JOISTS UNDER ALL PARALLEL BEARING PARTITIONS.GLUE LAMINATED BEAMS SHALL BE DOUGLAS FIR-LARCH, COMBINATION GRADE SHALL BE 24F ANDMANUFACTURER SHALL MEET ANSL/AITC A190.1-1983. SUBMIT INSPECTION CERTIFICATES TO THE ENGINEER ANDBUILDING DEPARTMENT. FABRICATION SHALL BE BY A LICENSED FABRICATOR. SUBMIT SHOP DRAWING FOR APPROVAL. PROVIDE TENSION LAMINATIONS TOP AND BOTTOM OF CANTILEVER BEAMS. MAXIMUM MOISTURECONTENT OF 16%. MEMBERS SHALL BE "ARCHITECTURAL" APPEARANCE GRADE IF EXPOSED. ADHESIVE SHALLBE WET USE. (BCI O.K. TO USE PER STURTURAL).TITLE 24 MANDATORY ENERGY CONSERVATION REQUIREMENTS: THE FOLLOWING AIR MINIMUM STANDARDSONLY AND DO NOT SUPERSEDE ANY MORE RESTRICTIVE STANDARDS FOUND IN THE PLANS OR SPECIFICATIONS.EAVE VENT BLOCKING: FRAMER TO PROVIDE AND INSTALL EAVE VENT BLOCKING AT EXTERIOR WALLS WITH (3)1-1 /2" DIAMETER VENT HOLES AT EACH BLOCK AND COVERED WITH CORROSION-RESISTANT METAL MESH WITHMESH OPENINGS OF 1/4 INCH IN DIMENSION. (FREE AREA PER BLOCK IS 5.3 SQ. INCHES).CAULKING AND WEATHER STRIPPING: DOORS AND WINDOWS (INCLUDING SKYLIGHTS) BETWEEN CONDITIONEDAND UNCONDITIONED SPACES MUST BE FULLY WEATHER STRIPPED. CAULKING OR SEALANTS OR WEATHERSTRIPPING MUST BE USED TO LIMIT INFILTRATION IN THE BUILDING ENVELOPE AT EXTERIOR JOINTS AROUNDWINDOWS AND DOOR FRAMES. CAULKING AND OR SEALANTS TO MATCH COLOR OF WINDOWS AND DOORS.DOORS AND WINDOWS: MANUFACTURED DOORS AND WINDOWS MUST BE LABELED AND CERTIFIED ACCORDINGTO SECTION 2-5304, TABLE 2-53S, STANDARDS FOR DOORS AND WINDOWS, OF THE STANDARDS.ALL WALLS AND CEILINGS TO BE PLUMB AND LINE. PLANE ANY OUT OF PLANE STUDS AND ADD REQUIREDCARDBOARD STRIPS NEEDED.IF IT IS CONTRACTORS DESIRE TO STORE MATERIALS ON JOB SITE PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK,OWNER’S APPROVAL IS REQUIRED. CONTRACTOR WILL ASSUME COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR SAIDMATERIALS AND IF DAMAGED OR STOLLEN WILL REPLACE AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER.

CONSULT WITH VARIOUS SUBCONTRACTORS BEFORE WORK IS STARTED REGARDING THE PROPER PLACING OFALL BLOCKS; BACKING FOR DRAPERY RODS, ENTRY DOOR STOPS, SHELVES, TELEVISIONS, MIRRORS, GARAGEDOORS, SHOWER RODS, HAND RAILS, AND CABINETS.FRAMING CONTRACTOR TO FURNISH AND INSTALL ALL NAILS, SHOT PINS, WASHERS FOR FOUNDATION BOLTS,FRAMING ANCHORS, SHEET METAL FASTENERS, SADDLES, ALL BOLTS AND LAG-BOLTS.PROVIDE SOLID BACKING FOR ALL ACCESSORIES. VERIFY LOCATIONS WITH OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLINGBACKING.INSTALL ALL TEMPORARY HANDRAILS, STAIRS AND BARRICADES PER STATE SAFELY ENGINEER AND "OSHA".

FRAMING CONTRACTOR RESPONCIBLE FOR ALL VIOLATIONS AND FINES IF NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH SAFTYSTANDARDS.STRUCTURAL FRAMING SHALL CONFORM TO ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND ORDINANCESEXCEPT WHERE THECONSTRUCTION SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS OR SPECIFIED EXCEEDS SUCH REQUIREMENTS.NAILING FOR FRAMING SHALL CONFORM TO THE FOLLOWING AS APPLICABLE:POWER ACTUATED SILL ANCHORAGE PINS TO BE AS MANUFACTURED BY "RAMSET".INTERIOR NON-BEARING WALLS: PER STURCTURAL DRAWINGS.INTERIOR SHEAR WALLS: PER STURCTURAL DRAWINGS.LAG SCREWS SHALL HAVE A DRILLED LEAD HOLE OF THE SAME DIAMETER AS THE SHANK AND SAME DEPTH AS THE LENGTH OF UNTHREADED SHANK. THE LEAD HOLE FOR THE THREADED PORTION OF A LENGTH EQUAL TOTHE LENGTH OF THE THREADED PORTION, AND A DIAMETER EQUAL TO 60% TO 75% OF THE SHANK DIAMETER.LAG SCREWS SHALL BE TURNED INTO PLACE AND NOT DRIVEN.BOLTS: ALL BOLT HEADS AND NUTS BEARING ON WOOD SHALL HAVE WASHERS. ALL BOLT HOLES IN WOOD SHALLBE DRILLED 1/32" DIAMETER LARGER THAN NORMAL BOLT DIAMETER.FRAMING HANGERS SHALL BE AS SPECIFICALLY MADE FOR THE CONNECTION CONDITION SHOWN ASMANUFACTURED BY SIMPSON STRONG TIE OR EQUIVALENT, AS APPROVED BY STRUCTURAL ENGINEER AND THEBUILDING INSPECTORALL SILLS AND PLATES RESTING ON CONCRETE OR MASONRY SHALL BE PRESSURE TREATED (P.T.). ANCHORBOLTS SHALL BE PER STURCTURAL DRAWINGS.KILN-DRIED LUMBER SHALL BE USED IF, DURING THE FRAMING STAGE, DETRIMENTAL EFFECT TO THE LUMBERWILL OCCUR DUE TO CLIMATIC CONDITIONS. GREEN LUMBER MAY BE USED IF CLIMATIC CONDITIONS ALLOW ANDWOOD IS NOT IN AN EXPOSED ARCHITECTURAL LOCATION. GREEN & DRIED LUMBER SHALL NOT BE MIXED WITHINANY FRAMING SYSTEM, I.E. GREEN & DRIED STUDS SHALL NOT BE MIXED WITHIN WALLS.TREATED WOOD: ALL FOUNDATION PLATES OR SILLS AND SLEEPERS ON A CONCRETE SLAB, WHICH IS IN DIRECTCONTACT WITH EARTH, AND SILLS WHICH REST ON CONCRETE OR MASONRY FOUNDATIONS, AND WOOD JOISTSCLOSER THAN 18", OR WOOD GIRDERS OR SUPPORTS CLOSER THAN 12" TO THE GROUND SHALL BE PRESSURETREATED WOOD OR FOUNDATION GRADE REDWOOD.STUDS: STUDS, UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN SHALL BE FULL LENGTH AND SPACED PER STURCTURAL DRAWINGS.STUDS SHALL BE DOUBLED AT ALL OPENINGS INCLUDING TRIMMER AND TRIPLED AT ALL CORNERS.NON-BEARING WALLS TO BE 2 X 4 STUDS AT 16" O/C.LUMBER: UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL JOISTS, RAFTERS, BEAMS, AND POSTS 2" TO 4. THICK SHALL BE N0.2GRADE DOUGLAS FIR-LARCH OR BETTER. ALL POSTS AND BEAMS 5" AND THICKER SHALL BE NO. 1 GRADEDOUGLAS FIR-LARCH OR BETTEREXPOSED WOOD: THE FOLLOWING ARE MINIMUM GRADES OF WOOD TO BE USED IN APPLICATIONS WHICH WILLRECEIVE PAINT, STAIN OR OTHERWISE BE EXPOSED. EXPOSED WOOD SHALL BE KILN-DRIED.FASCIAS: SELECT DFPOST: SELECT DF #1 (FREE OF HEART CENTERS) 06 20 00 - FINISH CARPENTRY
VERIFY WITH BUILDING DEPARTMENT IF THERE ARE LOCAL ORDINANCES OR CODES FOR SECURITY AS THEYRELATE TO DOORS, JAMBS AND HARDWARE. LOCAL CODES AND ORDINANCES PREVAIL.FURNISH AND INSTALL ALL MILLWORK AND TRIM.SET ALL DOOR FRAMES AND JAMBS. IF WOOD, ALL EXTERIOR DOOR JAMBS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 1 1/4" NETTHICK WOOD. ALL INTERIOR DOOR JAMBS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 3/4" NET WOOD. ALL EXTERIOR DOOR JAMBSADJACENT TO STUCCO SHALL HAVE A MANUFACTURED INTEGRAL REDWOOD STUCCO STOP UNLESS DETAILEDOTHERWISE. EACH DOOR SHALL BE ACCURATELY CUT, TRIMMED AND FITTED TO FRAME AND HARDWARE, ANDDUE ALLOWANCE FOR PAINTER'S FINISH AND POSSIBLE SWELLING AND SHRINKING. THE CLEARANCE AT THELOCK AND HANGING STILES AND AT THE TOP SHALL NOT EXCEED 1/8", AT BOTTOM SHALL NOT EXCEED 1/4"EXCEPT DOORS SHALL BE UNDERCUT WHERE DETAILED, AND THE LOCK STILE EDGE SHALL BE SLIGHTLYBEVELED.ALL DOOR FRAMES, INTERIOR WOOD FINISH, CLOSET SHELVES AND POLES, DOORS AND OTHER FIXED WOODENEQUIPMENT AND FINISHES SHALL BE PROPERLY INSTALLED, LEVEL, PLUMB AND TRUE. WHEREVER REQUIRED,THE MEMBER SHALL BE NEATLY AND ACCURATELY SCRIBED IN PLACE. ALL TRIM WHERE APPLICABLE, SHALL BEPUT ON IN FULL LENGTHS WITHOUT PIECING EXCEPT WHERE THE USE OF SINGLE LENGTHS WOULD BEIMPOSSIBLE. IN GENERAL, PIECING SHALL BE MITER JOINTED. ALL INTERIOR ANGLES SHALL BE MITERED ANDINTERIOR ANGLES COPED. IN ALL INSTANCES WHERE WORK SPECIFIED IN THIS SECTION ADJOINS OTHER WORK, A NEAT TIGHT JOINT SHALL BE MADE. ALL NAILS ON EXPOSED SURFACES SHALL BE SET AND FILLED. ALL FINISHWOOD SHALL HAVE FINISH VERIFIED BY OWNER.WARDROBE POLES SHALL BE 1 1 /2" CHROME FINISHED STEEL, AND SET IN PLACE WITH END SUPPORTING CLIPS.

FINISH HARDWARE: SHALL BE AS SELECTED BY OWNER AND PROVIDED AND INSTALLED BY FINISH CARPENTERPER LOCAL CODES AND ORDINANCES.WEATHER STRIPS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON ALL EXTERIOR DOORS AFTER THE DOOR IS HUNG TO FIT TIGHTLYAGAINST THE DOOR AND SHALL CONSIST OF AN ALUMINUM EXTRUSION WITH A PLIABLE VINYL WEATHER STRIP.IF IT IS CONTRACTORS DESIRE TO STORE MATERIALS ON JOB SITE PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK,OWNER’S APPROVAL IS REQUIRED. CONTRACTOR WILL ASSUME COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR SAIDMATERIALS AND IF DAMAGED OR STOLLEN WILL REPLACE AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER. 06 41 00 - ARCHITECTURAL WOOD CASEWORK
IF LAMINATED PLASTIC COUNTERTOPS ARE INDICATED IN THE DRAWINGS, COUNTERTOPS TO BE WILSON ART INSTANDARD COLORS, OR EQUIVALENT IF SAMPLE IS SUBMITTED AND APPROVED BY OWNER.COUNTERTOPS: TO BE CHOSEN BY OWNER WITH AMPLE LEAD TIME GIVEN.KITCHEN: MUD SET CERAMIC TILE BACKSPLASH AS SELECTED BY OWNER. FRONT EDGE SHALL BE BULL NOSED.BACK SPLASH SHALL BE PER OWNER. EXPOSED BACK AND SIDE EDGES SHALL BE BULL NOSED. SIDES ABUTTING WALLS SHALL RECEIVE A MINIMUM 4" COVED SPLASH.BATHROOM: MUD SET CERAMIC TILE AS SELECTED BY OWNER. FRONT EDGE SHALL BE BULL NOSED. BACKSPLASH SHALL BE 4" MINIMUM AND COVED. EXPOSED BACK AND SIDE EDGES SHALL BE BULL NOSED. SIDESABUTTING WALLS SHALL RECEIVE A MINIMUM 4" COVED SPLASH. FLOOR TILE SHALL HAVE CEMENT BOARDUNDERLAYMENT LAID PERPENDICULAR TO SUBFLOOR WITH ADDED ANTI-FRACTURE MEMBRANE INSTALLEDBEFORE TILE.LAVATORY BOWLS ARE TO BE MOUNTED PER OWNER.IF IT IS CONTRACTORS DESIRE TO STORE MATERIALS ON JOB SITE PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK,OWNER’S APPROVAL IS REQUIRED. CONTRACTOR WILL ASSUME COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR SAIDMATERIALS AND IF DAMAGED OR STOLLEN WILL REPLACE AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER.ALL CABINETS SHALL BE AS SELECTED BY OWNER. STYLE AS SELECTED BY OWNER.ALL DRAWERS TO HAVE NYLON ROLLERS THROUGHOUT AND SOFT CLOSE MECHINISMS.CABINET DOORS TO HAVE FELT CUSHION STOPS AND SOFT CLOSE MECHINISMS.CABINETS TO BE BID WITH BACKS.CABINET CONTRACTOR TO FIELD MEASURE EACH AREA TO RECEIVE CABINETS PRIOR TO SHOP DRAWING &FABRICATION.SHOP DRAWINGS TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER. 07 10 00 - DAMPROOFING AND WATERPROOFING
WESTCOAT DECK WATERPROOFING SYSTEM - ALX STANDARD (ESR-2201) ON ALL DECKSMASONRY RETAINING WALLS SHALL BE WATERPROOFED WITH VULKEM 201 HAS MANUFACTURED BY MAMECOINTERNATIONAL, INC., CLEVELAND, OHIO, OR EQUIVALENT.APPROVED APPLICATOR: APPLICATION SHALL BE BY A CONTRACTOR TRAINED AND APPROVED BY THEMANUFACTURER AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STANDARDS OF THE MANUFACTURER AND AS SPECIFIEDHEREIN.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REQUEST THE SERVICES OF A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE MANUFACTURER FOR THEINITIAL INSTRUCTIONS IN PREPARATION, MIXING AND APPLICATION OF MATERIALS. THE MANUFACTURER SHALLSUPPLY SUCH SERVICE AS REQUIRED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER.WALL MUST BE CLEAN AND DRY. FOLLOW MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS FOR WALL PREPARATION ANDPROPER CURING OF MASONRY WALL. ALLOW AMPLE TIME FOR SOLID GROUTED WALL CURING.DETAILING OF WALL: INSPECT ALL MORTAR JOINTS AND BLOCK FOR VOIDS. HOLES SHOULD BE FILLED ASRECOMMENDED BY MANUFACTURER. COMMENCEMENT OF WORK SHALL CONSTITUTE ACCEPTANCE OF THESURFACE FOR WATERPROOFING.MANUFACTURER'S CERTIFICATION: UPON COMPLETION OF THE INSTALLATION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN AND FURNISH TO THE OWNER A STATEMENT FROM THE MANUFACTURER THAT THEIR REPRESENTATIVE HASVISITED THE SITE AND INSTRUCTED THE TRADES INVOLVED IN THE PROPER TECHNIQUES AND INSTALLATIONMETHODS, THAT DURING THE PROPER TECHNIQUES AND INSTALLATION METHODS, THAT DURING THE VISITS OFTHE REPRESENTATIVE THE MANUFACTURER'S PRODUCTS WERE PROPERLY INSTALLED, WITH EXCEPTIONS, IFANY, NOTED.INSTALL AMACOR P-14 1/4" THICK PROTECTIVE BOARD OR EQUIVALENT, AFTER INSTALLING WATERPROOF ANDPRIOR TO INSTALLING DRAINAGE MATTING.USE VULKEM 203 OR EQUIVALENT FOR CANTING AT COLD JOINT AT BOTTOM OF WALLS, AND DETAILING OFJOINTS AND CRACKS.(CONTACT SUNSHINE SUPPLY FOR PRODUCT INFORMATION 619-276-7442)SEE SECTION 07190 FOR SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE MATTING WHICH SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO BACKFILLINGTO PROTECT WATERPROOFING.OWNER TO VERIFY ALL WATER PROOFING MATERIALS BEFORE INSTALLATION.IF IT IS CONTRACTORS DESIRE TO STORE MATERIALS ON JOB SITE PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK,OWNER’S APPROVAL IS REQUIRED. CONTRACTOR WILL ASSUME COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR SAIDMATERIALS AND IF DAMAGED OR STOLLEN WILL REPLACE AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER. 07 19 00 - WATER REPELLENTS
PROVIDE AND INSTALL A MINIMUM OF TWO (2) COATS THORO (T1956) (CLEAR) AS MANUFACTURED BY THOROSYSTEM PRODUCTS, OR EQUIVALENT ON ALL CMU WALLS AND ALL EXTERIOR EXPOSED CONCRETE.DELIVERY AND STORAGE OF MATERIALS: ALL MANUFACTURED MATERIALS SHALL BE DELIVERED IN THEIRORIGINAL PACKAGES, CONTAINERS AND BUNDLES BEARING NAME OF MANUFACTURER AND BRAND. STORE ALLMATERIALS OFF THE GROUND UNDER WATERTIGHT COVER AND AWAY FROM SWEATING WALLS AND OTHERDAMP SURFACES UNTIL READY FOR USE. DAMAGED OR DETERIORATED MATERIALS MUST BE REMOVED FROMPREMISE IMMEDIATELY.PROTECTION: DURING APPLICATION OF EXTERIOR WATER REPELLENT, PROTECT WORK OF OTHER TRADESAGAINST UNDUE SPOILAGE AND DAMAGE BY THE EXERCISE OF REASONABLE CARE AND PRECAUTION. REPAIRAND/OR REPLACE ANY WORK SO DAMAGED OR SOILED AS TO BE UNSIGHTLY IN ARCHITECT'S JUDGMENT AT NOADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER OR CONTRACT SUM.QUALITY ASSURANCE: INSTALLATION SHALL STRICTLY ADHERE TO MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS.IF IT IS CONTRACTORS DESIRE TO STORE MATERIALS ON JOB SITE PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK,OWNER’S APPROVAL IS REQUIRED. CONTRACTOR WILL ASSUME COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR SAIDMATERIALS AND IF DAMAGED OR STOLLEN WILL REPLACE AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER. 07 21 00 - THERMAL INSULATION
PROVIDE AND INSTALL FRICTION FIT FIBERGLASS INSULATION. "R" VALUE SHALL BE CLEARLY PRINTED ON THE INSULATION AND EXPOSED TO VIEW AFTER INSULATION. LISTED ARE MINIMUM ACCEPTED VALUES:

EXTERIOR WALLS: R-19INTERIOR WALLS: R-13AREA SEPARATION / UNIT SEPARATION: R-19CEILINGS: R-19CEILING/ROOF COMBINATIONS: R-30WALL BETWEEN GARAGE AND LIVING AREAS SHALL BE INSULATED WITH R-19 INSULATION. GARAGE EXTERIORWALLS DO NOT RECEIVE INSULATION.TITLE 24 MANDATORY ENERGY CONSERVATION REQUIREMENTS: THE FOLLOWING ARE MIN. STANDARDS ONLYAND DO NOT SUPERSEDE ANY MORE RESTRICTIVE STANDARDS FOUND IN THE PLANS OR SPECIFICATIONS.CEILING INSULATION: INSULATION WITH A MINIMUM THERMAL RESISTANCE OF R-19 OR GREATER SHALL BEINSTALLED IN CEILINGS BETWEEN CONDITIONED AND UNCONDITIONED SPACES. WHEN LOOSE FILL INSULATION ISINSTALLED, THE MINIMUM INSTALLED WEIGHT PER SQUARE FOOT SHALL MEET THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLEDDESIGN DENSITY PER SQUARE FOOT R-VALUE.SPECIAL ATTENTION SHOULD BE TAKEN TO ASSURE THAT EAVE VENTS ARE NOT BLOCKED BY INSULATION. TOMEET THE INTENT OF THE CEILING INSULATION REQUIREMENT, CEILING INSULATION SHOULD EXTENDSUFFICIENTLY FAR ENOUGH TO COVER THE TOP PLATE.WALL INSULATION: INSULATION WITH A MINIMUM THERMAL RESISTANCE OF R-13 OR GREATER SHALL BEINSTALLED IN WOOD FRAME WALLS BETWEEN CONDITIONED AND UNCONDITIONED SPACES.IF IT IS CONTRACTORS DESIRE TO STORE MATERIALS ON JOB SITE PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK,OWNER’S APPROVAL IS REQUIRED. CONTRACTOR WILL ASSUME COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR SAIDMATERIALS AND IF DAMAGED OR STOLLEN WILL REPLACE AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER. 07 60 00 - FLASHING AND SHEET METAL
PROVIDE AND INSTALL ALL SCUPPERS AND DOWNSPOUTS, FAN VENTS AND DUCTS, ROOF JACKS, FLASHING "Z''BARS, COMBUSTION AIR VENTS, DRYER VENTS, AME VENTS, DRAIN PANS FOR WATER HEATERS, ETC.ROOF RAIN GUTTERS AND DOWNSPOUTS: IF SHOWN ON PLANS, GUTTERS AND DOWNSPOUTS SHALL BEGALVANIZED TO MATCH SIDING PER PLAN. DOWN SPOUTS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 2"X3" AND SHALL RUN TIGHTTO BUILDING, USING ADEQUATE ELBOWS TO CLOSELY ADHERE TO THE EXTERIOR SURFACE.G.I. SHEET METAL TO BE MINIMUM 26 GA. WITH WATER TIGHT INSTALLATIONS. ALL JOINTS TO BE CAULKED.CAULKING TO MATCH.TITLE 24 MANDATORY ENERGY CONSERVATION REQUIREMENTS: THE FOLLOWING ARE MINIMUM STANDARDSONLY AND DO NOT SUPERSEDE ANY MORE RESTRICTIVE STANDARDS FOUND IN THE PLANS OR SPECIFICATIONS.DAMPER CONTROLS: AIR LEAKAGE FROM EXHAUST FANS OR OTHER EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE PREVENTEDBY USING BACKDRAFT DAMPERS OR AUTOMATIC DAMPERS IF REQUIRED BY BUILDING INSPECTOR.IF IT IS CONTRACTORS DESIRE TO STORE MATERIALS ON JOB SITE PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK,OWNER’S APPROVAL IS REQUIRED. CONTRACTOR WILL ASSUME COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR SAIDMATERIALS AND IF DAMAGED OR STOLLEN WILL REPLACE AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER. 07 50 00 - MEMBRANE ROOFING
CONTRACTOR SHALL EXAMINE ALL ROOF SURFACES AND NOTIFY OWNER IN WRITING OF DEFECTS WHICHARE DETRIMENTAL TO THE INSTALLATION OF HIS PRODUCT. STARTING WORK WITHOUT SUCHNOTIFICATION CONSTITUTES ACCEPTANCE OF ROOF DECK AND RESPONSIBILITY FOR SAME.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SEE THAT ALL DEFECTS ARE CORRECTED BEFORE INSTALLING HIS WORK.OTHERWISE, THIS CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE, AT HIS OWN EXPENSE, ALL ROOFING WHICH MAY HAVETO BE REMOVED TO CORRECT DEFECTS THAT ARE DAMAGED THEREBY.INTENT - CLASS 'A' TYPE ROOF WITH MINIMUM 20 YEAR WARRENTY. SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FORTORCH DOWN OR CEMENTITIOUS TROWL DOWN.SPECIFICATION:THE OBJECT OF THESE RECOMMENDATIONS IS TO PROMOTE THE HIGHEST STANDARD OF WORKMANSHIPAND MATERIALS FOR ROOFING. IT SHOULD BE EMPHASIZED THAT LOCAL CODE REQUIREMENTS, WEATHERCONDITIONS AND INSTALLATION EXPERTISE MUST AT ALL TIMES BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT, AND WHENSUCH REQUIREMENTS VARY FROM THOSE CONTAINED IN THESE RECOMMENDATIONS, THEY MUST TAKEPRECEDENCE.SEE ROOF PLAN FOR ROOFING SPECIFICATIONS.IF IT IS CONTRACTORS DESIRE TO STORE MATERIALS ON JOB SITE PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK,OWNER’S APPROVAL IS REQUIRED. CONTRACTOR WILL ASSUME COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR SAIDMATERIALS AND IF DAMAGED OR STOLLEN WILL REPLACE AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER. 07 90 00 - JOINT PROTECTION
TITLE 24 MANDATORY ENERGY CONSERVATION REQUIREMENTS: THE FOLLOWING ARE MINIMUM STANDARDSONLY AND DO NOT SUPERSEDE ANY MORE RESTRICTIVE STANDARDS FOUND IN THE PLANS OR SPECIFICATIONS.CAULKING AND WEATHER STRIPPING: DOORS AND WINDOWS (INCLUDING SKYLIGHTS) BETWEEN CONDITIONEDAND UNCONDITIONED SPACES MUST BE FULLY WEATHER STRIPPED. CAULKING OR SEALANTS OR WEATHERSTRIPPING MUST BE USED TO LIMIT INFILTRATION IN THE BUILDING ENVELOPE AT THE FOLLOWING OPENINGS:EXTERIOR JOINTS AROUND WINDOWS AND DOOR FRAMES, BETWEEN WALL SOLE PLATES AND FLOORS, ANDBETWEEN EXTERIOR WALL PANELS, PENETRATION IN WALLS, CEILINGS, AND FLOORS FOR PLUMBING,ELECTRICITY, AND GAS LINES, OPENINGS IN ATTIC FLOORS, ALL OTHER OPENINGS IN THE BUILDING ENVELOPE.IF IT IS CONTRACTORS DESIRE TO STORE MATERIALS ON JOB SITE PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK,OWNER’S APPROVAL IS REQUIRED. CONTRACTOR WILL ASSUME COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR SAIDMATERIALS AND IF DAMAGED OR STOLLEN WILL REPLACE AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER.CAULK AT JOINT BETWEEN SHEET VINYL AND BATHTUBS.CAULK AT JOINT BETWEEN LAMINATED PLASTIC COUNTERTOPS AND WALLS.CAULK AT JOINTS BETWEEN DISSIMILAR FINISH MATERIALS WHERE A GAP REMAINS. 08 50 00 - WINDOWS

INCLUDES ALL LABOR, MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT, TRANSPORTATION AND SERVICES NECESSARY FOR FURNISHING AND INSTALLING GLASS, AND GLAZING AS SHOWN ON PLANS AND AS SPECIFIED HEREIN.VERIFY WITH BUILDING DEPARTMENT IF THERE ARE LOCAL ORDINANCES OR CODES FOR SECURITY AS THEY RELATE TO WINDOWS AND HARDWARE. LOCAL CODES AND ORDINANCES PREVAIL.ROLLERS TO BE NYLON, BRASS OR STEEL. FRAMES TO HAVE NAILING FINS IF REQUIRED AND DRIP SILLS.COMPLETELY WEATHER STRIPPED. DUAL GLAZING PER CODE. COMPLETE WITH SCREENS. INSTALLED LEVEL,PLUMB, SECURE, CAULKED AND FLASHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOOD PRACTICE.ALL GLAZING TO BE CLEAR UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. WHERE GLAZING IS INDICATED TO BE TINTED, TINTCOLOR SHALL BE AS SELECTED BY OWNER.SLIDING WINDOWS NEXT TO EXTERIOR DOORS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH THE FIXED GLAZING ADJACENT TO THEDOOR.WINDOWS TO HAVE VANDAL RESISTANT HARDWARE AT STREET LEVEL.FRAMES TO BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO LATHING. GLASS TO BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO SCRATCH COAT.TITLE 24 MANDATORY ENERGY CONSERVATION REQUIREMENTS: THE FOLLOWING ARE MINIMUM STANDARDSONLY AND DO NOT SUPERSEDE ANY MORE RESTRICTIVE STANDARDS FOUND IN THE PLANS OR SPECIFICATIONS.CAULKING AND WEATHER STRIPPING: DOORS AND WINDOWS (INCLUDING SKYLIGHTS) BETWEEN CONDITIONEDAND UNCONDITIONED SPACES MUST BE FULLY WEATHER STRIPPED. CAULKING OR SEALANTS OR WEATHERSTRIPPING MUST BE USED TO LIMIT INFILTRATION IN THE BUILDING ENVELOPE AT EXTERIOR JOINTS AROUNDWINDOWS AND DOOR FRAMES.DOORS AND WINDOWS: MANUFACTURED DOORS AND WINDOWS MUST BE LABELED AND CERTIFIED ACCORDINGTO SECTION 2-5304, TABLE 2-53S, STANDARDS FOR DOORS AND WINDOWS, OF THE STANDARDS.IF IT IS CONTRACTORS DESIRE TO STORE MATERIALS ON JOB SITE PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK,OWNER’S APPROVAL IS REQUIRED. CONTRACTOR WILL ASSUME COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR SAIDMATERIALS AND IF DAMAGED OR STOLLEN WILL REPLACE AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER. 06 10 00 - ROUGH CARPENTRY
BEAMS: SELECT DF #1 (FREE OF HEART CENTERS)STARTER BOARD: #2 SPRUCE SHIPLAP V-JOINT T&G

REVISION SCHEDULE
# DESCRIPTION DATE

Page 163 of 615 ends

Drawn by
Reviewed by
1 D Project number
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:MEP:STRUCTURAL ENGINEER:Developer:

N.T.C. Development Inc.1380 El Cajon BLVD. Ste. 202El Cajon, CA 92020Phone: 619.593.2600 InDev + Design, INC © 2021 All Rights Reserved
Architect:

InDev+Design, Inc.2120 Columbia St.Suite 17 San Diego, CA 92101Phone: 858.231.9914 PROJECT ADDRESS:
8043 HIGH St.LA MESA, CA 91941

REVISIONS
Submittal DatePlan Date
TBD
April 2021
PROJECT STATUS:

AJB

ZS / CG

CANTERA
PROJECT # B19-319-324
T-101
9/30/2021 9:14:20 AM SITE IMAGES

CANTERA
3D SITE VIEW 1 3D SITE VIEW 23D SITE VIEW 3 3D SITE VIEW 4

Page 164 of 615 ends

Drawn by
Reviewed by
1 D Project number
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:MEP:STRUCTURAL ENGINEER:Developer:

N.T.C. Development Inc.1380 El Cajon BLVD. Ste. 202El Cajon, CA 92020Phone: 619.593.2600 InDev + Design, INC © 2021 All Rights Reserved
Architect:

InDev+Design, Inc.2120 Columbia St.Suite 17 San Diego, CA 92101Phone: 858.231.9914 PROJECT ADDRESS:
8043 HIGH St.LA MESA, CA 91941

REVISIONS
Submittal DatePlan Date
TBD
April 2021
PROJECT STATUS:

AJB

ZS / CG

CANTERA
PROJECT # B19-319-324
T-102
9/30/2021 9:14:24 AM SITE IMAGES

CANTERA
3D SITE VIEW 5 3D SITE VIEW 63D SITE VIEW 7 3D SITE VIEW 8

Page 165 of 615 ends

CORTEN STEEL AND ROUGHED FACED CMU -

FRONT PRIVACY FENCE

PAINTED SHEET METAL - FRONT OPENING GATE &

TRASH ENCLOSURE
DESIGN #1 = PURA BY TRESPA (AGED ASH) DESIGN #2 = PURA BY TRESPA (IPE) DESIGN #3 = PURA BY TRESPA (CLASIC OAK)SOLDIER PILE - NON STRUCTURAL PRIVACY

SAFTEY FENCE
PAVER = HYDROLOGIC PERMEABLE PAVERS CARPORT - ARIZONA WAVE 5000 *OR EQUIVALENT *OR EQUIVALENT *OR EQUIVALENT *OR EQUIVALENT *OR EQUIVALENT *OR EQUIVALENT *OR EQUIVALENT
*OR EQUIVALENT
Drawn byReviewed by
1 D Project number
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:MEP:STRUCTURAL ENGINEER:Developer:

N.T.C. Development Inc.1380 El Cajon BLVD. Ste. 202El Cajon, CA 92020Phone: 619.593.2600 InDev + Design, INC © 2021 All Rights Reserved
Architect:

InDev+Design, Inc.2120 Columbia St.Suite 17 San Diego, CA 92101Phone: 858.231.9914 PROJECT ADDRESS:
8043 HIGH St.LA MESA, CA 91941

REVISIONS
Submittal DatePlan Date
TBD
April 2021
PROJECT STATUS:

AJB

ZS / CG

CANTERA
PROJECT # B19-319-324
TS-103
7/20/2021 12:42:10 PMMATERIAL BOARD

CANTERA

Page 166 of 615 ends

Drawn by
Reviewed by
1 D Project number
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:MEP:STRUCTURAL ENGINEER:Developer:

N.T.C. Development Inc.1380 El Cajon BLVD. Ste. 202El Cajon, CA 92020Phone: 619.593.2600 InDev + Design, INC © 2021 All Rights Reserved
Architect:

InDev+Design, Inc.2120 Columbia St.Suite 17 San Diego, CA 92101Phone: 858.231.9914 PROJECT ADDRESS:
8043 HIGH St.LA MESA, CA 91941

REVISIONS
Submittal DatePlan Date
TBD
April 2021
PROJECT STATUS:

AJB

ZS / CG

CANTERA
PROJECT # B19-319-324
TS-104
7/20/2021 12:43:29 PM DESIGN 1

CANTERA
1/2" = 1'-0" 1 UNIT A FRONT DESIGN STYLE 1 1/2" = 1'-0" 2 UNIT A LEFT DESIGN STYLE 1 3 A.1 4 B.1 5 C.1

PURA COMPOSTITE

SIDING BY TRESPA
(AGED ASH)

BLACK ANODIZED ALUMINUM

BANDING AND EDGING

BLACK ANODIZED ALUMINUM SIDING AND EDGING

BLACK ANODIZED

ALUMINUM ROOFING CAP
*OR EQUIVALENT
*OR EQUIVALENT
*OR EQUIVALENT*OR EQUIVALENT

Page 167 of 615 ends

Drawn by
Reviewed by
1 D Project number
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:MEP:STRUCTURAL ENGINEER:Developer:

N.T.C. Development Inc.1380 El Cajon BLVD. Ste. 202El Cajon, CA 92020Phone: 619.593.2600 InDev + Design, INC © 2021 All Rights Reserved
Architect:

InDev+Design, Inc.2120 Columbia St.Suite 17 San Diego, CA 92101Phone: 858.231.9914 PROJECT ADDRESS:
8043 HIGH St.LA MESA, CA 91941

REVISIONS
Submittal DatePlan Date
TBD
April 2021
PROJECT STATUS:

AJB

ZS / CG

CANTERA
PROJECT # B19-319-324
TS-105
7/20/2021 12:44:30 PM DESIGN 2

CANTERA
1/2" = 1'-0" 1 UNIT A FRONT DESIGN STYLE 2 1/2" = 1'-0" 2 UNIT A LEFT DESIGN STYLE 2 3 A.2 4 B.2 5 C.2

BLACK ANODIZED ALUMINUM

BANDING AND EDGING

BLACK ANODIZED ALUMINUM SIDING AND EDGING

BLACK ANODIZED

ALUMINUM ROOFING CAP

PURA COMPOSTITE

SIDING BY TRESPA
(IPE)
*OR EQUIVALENT
*OR EQUIVALENT
*OR EQUIVALENT*OR EQUIVALENT

Page 168 of 615 ends

Drawn by
Reviewed by
1 D Project number
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:MEP:STRUCTURAL ENGINEER:Developer:

N.T.C. Development Inc.1380 El Cajon BLVD. Ste. 202El Cajon, CA 92020Phone: 619.593.2600 InDev + Design, INC © 2021 All Rights Reserved
Architect:

InDev+Design, Inc.2120 Columbia St.Suite 17 San Diego, CA 92101Phone: 858.231.9914 PROJECT ADDRESS:
8043 HIGH St.LA MESA, CA 91941

REVISIONS
Submittal DatePlan Date
TBD
April 2021
PROJECT STATUS:

AJB

ZS / CG

CANTERA
PROJECT # B19-319-324
TS-106
7/20/2021 12:45:34 PM DESIGN 3

CANTERA
1/2" = 1'-0" 1 UNIT A FRONT DESIGN STYLE 3 1/2" = 1'-0" 2 UNIT A LEFT DESIGN STYLE 3 3 A.3 4 B.3 5 C.3

BLACK ANODIZED ALUMINUM

BANDING AND EDGING

BLACK ANODIZED ALUMINUM SIDING AND EDGING

BLACK ANODIZED

ALUMINUM ROOFING CAP

PURA COMPOSTITE

SIDING BY TRESPA
(CLASSIC OAK)
*OR EQUIVALENT
*OR EQUIVALENT
*OR EQUIVALENT
*OR EQUIVALENT

Page 169 of 615 ends

Page 170 of 615 ends

Page 171 of 615 ends

Page 172 of 615 ends

REPORT to the MAYOR and MEMBERS of the CITY COUNCIL
From the CITY MANAGER
DATE: June 14, 2022
SUBJECT: RATIFICATION OF DESIGN REVIEW FOR PROJECT
2021-44 (GAIPA) – PROPOSED EXTERIOR

ALTERATIONS TO AN EXISTING COMMERCIAL
BUILDING AT 8301 LA MESA BOULEVARD, APN 494-
421-01-00 IN THE CD-D (DOWNTOWN COMMERCIAL
/ URBAN DESIGN OVERLAY) ZONE
ISSUING DEPARTMENT: Community Development
SUMMARY:

Issues:

1. Does the proposed design meet the intent of the Urban Design Program policies?

2. Is the proposed design consistent with the design policies and objectives of the Downtown Village Specific Plan?
Recommendation:

Ratify the Design Review Board’s approval of Project 2021-44 (Attachment A).

Fiscal Impact:

There would be no impact to the General Fund related to this project. City of La Mesa policy is to recover 100% of the cost of staff time through application processing fees.

City’s Strategic Goals:
 Revitalize neighborhoods and corridors

Page 173 of 615 ends

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: June 14, 2022
Page: 2 of 5
Environmental Review:

This project is categorically exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Sections 15301 and 15331.

BACKGROUND:

The project site is located at the southeast corner of La Mesa Boulevard and Palm Avenue in the downtown village and is developed with a two-story commercial retail building that was until recently known as the La Mesa Pharmacy. The building occupies most of the site’s 5,000 square-foot footprint and has public alley access at the rear.

Behind the building are an exterior stair and a paved area that accommodates one offstreet parking space.

Owing to its position at a prominent intersection in the heart of the village, the adjacent right-of-way has enhanced pedestrian features including a crosswalk bulb-out, mature trees, benches, and a decorative street light on which catenary lighting is mounted.

Neighboring buildings are one- and two-stories tall with traditional shopkeeper storefronts similar to that of the subject property.

Constructed in 1921, the building is listed as a potential landmark in the Historic Resources Inventory. It originally had two retail spaces on the ground floor along La Mesa Boulevard and a small ground floor office with a Palm Avenue entrance. The two La Mesa Boulevard retail spaces were combined into one in 1966. The second floor was originally residential, but was converted to commercial space by the end of the 1920s and has remained commercial ever since. The exterior has been remodeled to varying degrees at least five times over the years, beginning in 1938.

A vicinity map is provided below. The Assessor Parcel Map sheet is provided as Attachment B, and current and historic photos of the project site are provided as Attachment C.

Zoning along La Mesa Boulevard is CD-D (Downtown Commercial/ Urban Design Overlay) and the site’s Planned Land Use Designation is Downtown Commercial. The Urban Design Overlay prescribes design review by the Design Review Board (DRB) for building additions and exterior alterations. The Downtown Village Specific Plan’s design guidelines place emphasis on preserving historic buildings and architecturally significant stores that establish a diverse, pedestrian-oriented scale and create a sense of place.

Page 174 of 615 ends

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: June 14, 2022
Page: 3 of 5
The property owner submitted a
planning application for a building
addition and exterior alterations that
included a request for a parking
modification to reduce the number of
parking spaces provided. Parking
modifications are subject to site
development plan approval by the
Planning Commission. The Planning
Commission reviewed and approved the
parking modification on May 18, 2022.

Resolution PC-2022-05 is provided as
Attachment D.

DISCUSSION:

The Design Review Board reviewed the submitted project plans (Attachment F) in consideration of the City’s Urban Design Program and Downtown Village Specific Plan.

The scope of work includes converting the single tenant space facing La Mesa Boulevard back to two smaller interior spaces and constructing a small second-story addition at the rear. Exterior alterations are planned to restore the building to an earlier appearance. Other site improvements, including relocation of the exterior stair, are proposed adjacent to the alley.

Most of the proposed work on the storefront affects the windows and doors. The existing pair of non-original aluminum frame double doors on the north elevation will be replaced with new aluminum-frame and glass doors partitioned for separate storefront entrances. Non-original aluminum frame storefront windows on the north and west elevations will be replaced with operable wood frame units. Original transom openings along the first floor of the north and west elevations will be revealed and restored.

Second-story windows on the north and west elevations will be replaced with period appropriate wood-clad aluminum casement windows. The existing west elevation entrance will be moved north of its current location and new period-appropriate windows will be installed in the original openings that had been closed. Ganged casement windows will be installed at the second floor south elevation.

Green and black tile that was added in the 1960s will be replaced with similar, but not identical tile. The original colors are not currently available, but the applicant has selected Marazzi Arteko Green Subway and Gloss Black tiles in a color and shape similar to the existing. Application of the tile is proposed in the same location and design as existing. Total replacement is planned due to the high potential for breakage during Vicinity Map

Page 175 of 615 ends

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: June 14, 2022
Page: 4 of 5
window and door replacement and single tiles cannot be used as the replacement is not an exact match. The DRB was in favor of the proposed material, but recommended two conditions of approval related to how the tile is applied. First, the tilework should be extended uniformly to the top of the transom windows to provide a consistent appearance. Second, the decorative vent tiles present in the bulkheads below the windows should be retained and reused.

The existing awning system that wraps around the north and west elevations will remain in place and be repainted black. Signage is proposed on the face of the canopy and projecting from the wall similar to the sign placement visible in early photos. Areas that are currently stucco will remain so and the decorative cornice will remain in place. The proposed colors fall within a palette of autumn tan, oak, and hunter green.

At the rear of the building, a frame enclosure on the second floor will be removed and a second floor addition constructed in its place, extending flush with the rear wall of the first story. The new exterior stairs will be located closer to Palm Avenue. A new trash enclosure is also planned adjacent to the alley.

The Design Review Board concluded that the applicant has made a diligent effort to rehabilitate the building in a way that is sensitive to its history while making it viable for a new use. The building retains its original form, scale, and character and will improve the pedestrian experience along La Mesa Boulevard. The distinguishing original features and character are preserved. A Historical Resource Review Report (Attachment E) prepared by a qualified historic preservation professional concluded that the project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource.

Overall, the project improves a commercial site in need of revitalization and does so in a manner that is consistent with the Urban Design Program and the Downtown Village Specific Plan.

CONCLUSION:

Staff recommends that the City Council ratify the Design Review Board’s approval of Project 2021-44.

Reviewed by: Respectfully submitted by:
____________________ ____________________________
Greg Humora Kerry Kusiak
City Manager Director of Community Development

Page 176 of 615 ends

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: June 14, 2022
Page: 5 of 5
Attachments:

A. Design Review Board Certification of Action Project 2021-44 B. Assessor Parcel Map Sheet
C. Site photographs
D. Planning Commission Resolution PC-2022-05
E. Historical Resource Review Report
F. Project plans

Page 177 of 615 ends

Page 178 of 615 ends

Page 179 of 615 ends

Page 180 of 615 ends

Page 181 of 615 ends

Page 182 of 615 ends

Photo 4: View southeast of the west elevation.
$77$&+0(17% Page 183 of 615
Historical Resource Review Report | Noyes Block Building 8301-8305 La Mesa Boulevard, La Mesa, CA 91942
Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC | September 2021 | Attachment B. Historic and Current Views Photo 7: View northeast of the west and south elevations.

Photo 8: View north of the south elevation along the alley showing the stair addition on the right.

Page 184 of 615 ends

Page 185 of 615 ends

Page 186 of 615 ends

Page 187 of 615 ends

Page 188 of 615 ends

HISTORICAL RESOURCE REVIEW REPORT
Noyes Block Building
8301-8305 La Mesa Boulevard
La Mesa, CA 91942
PREPARED FOR / SUBMITTED TO:

Pacific Capital Investments
4731 Palm Avenue, La Mesa, CA 91941
+
John Rumsey, AIA
MPA Architects
3578 30th Street, San Diego, CA 92104
+
City of La Mesa
Development Services Department
8130 Allison Avenue, La Mesa, CA 91942
PREPARED BY:

Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC
7705 El Cajon Boulevard, Ste. 1, La Mesa, CA 91942
www.urbanapreservation.com
September 2021

Page 189 of 615 ends

Historical Resource Review Report | Noyes Block Building 8301-8305 La Mesa Boulevard, La Mesa, CA 91942
Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC | September 2021 | Page ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE ................................................................................................................1 Proposed Project Description....................................................................................................................1 Methodological Approach ........................................................................................................................1 II. REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ...................................................................................................................3 California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR).....................................................................................................................................................3 Integrity and the CRHR...........................................................................................................................3 The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation ...................................................................4 City of La Mesa Historic Preservation Program.......................................................................................4 City of La Mesa Historic Landmark (Local Register) Eligibility Criteria .................................................6 III. HISTORICAL OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................................7 La Mesa.....................................................................................................................................................7 La Mesa Boulevard ...................................................................................................................................9 Noyes Block Building ..............................................................................................................................10 Marker and Russell Contractors.............................................................................................................12 IV. ARCHITECTURAL OVERVIEW..............................................................................................................14 Two-Part Commercial Block ..................................................................................................................14 Construction History...............................................................................................................................14 Current Description ................................................................................................................................15 Integrity Status........................................................................................................................................16 V. SIGNIFICANCE EVALUATION .................................................................................................................18 CRHR Criterion 1 / Local Register Criterion A...................................................................................18 CRHR Criterion 2 / Local Register Criterion D...................................................................................19 CRHR Criterion 3 / Local Register Criterion B and E.........................................................................19 Local Register Criterion C......................................................................................................................20 CRHR Criterion 4 / Local Register Criterion F....................................................................................20 Local Register Criterion G......................................................................................................................20 Historical Resource Determination ........................................................................................................20 VI. DESIGN REVIEW ANALYSIS / PROJECT IMPACTS ................................................................................21 The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation .................................................................24 VII. REGULATORY CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................................29 Historical Resource Impacts ...................................................................................................................29 Mitigation Measures................................................................................................................................29 VIII. ENDNOTES / WORKS CITED.............................................................................................................30

Page 190 of 615 ends

Historical Resource Review Report | Noyes Block Building 8301-8305 La Mesa Boulevard, La Mesa, CA 91942
Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC | September 2021 | Page iii

APPENDICES
Appendix A – Building Records
Appendix B – Historic and Current Views
Appendix C – Occupant Information
Appendix D – Preparer Qualifications

Page 191 of 615 ends

Historical Resource Review Report | Noyes Block Building 8301-8305 La Mesa Boulevard, La Mesa, CA 91942
Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC | September 2021 | Page 1 I. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE
Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC (Urbana) has researched and evaluated the Noyes Block Building at 8301-8305 La Mesa Boulevard for historical and architectural significance under the eligibility criteria of the City of La Mesa Register of Historic Landmarks (Local Register) and the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR). The purpose of this Historical Resource Review Report (HRRR) is to assist the property owner and project applicant, project design professionals, and City Staff in the historic preservation regulatory review process for current and future proposed discretionary projects at the building. This HRRR evaluates the Noyes Block Building for significance, analyzes whether significant impacts will occur to the resource, and assesses proposed renovations at the building for compliance with The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation per Section 15064.5 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. A historical and architectural overview, current description, and related historical resource regulatory interpretation are included in the following pages.

The Noyes Block Building is located at 8301-8305 La Mesa Boulevard, on Lots 1 and 2, Block 3, of Park’s Addition, recorded in 1906 as Map No. 993. The property is identified as San Diego County Assessor’s Parcel No. 494-421-01-00. The subject property includes a two-story commercial building constructed between 1921 and 1922 in a Two-Part Commercial Block style. The property sits on the southeast corner of La Mesa Boulevard and Palm Avenue and directly abuts a separately owned building addressed as 8313-8315 La Mesa Blvd. The property is bound to the south by an alley that intersects Block 3. Within the downtown core, the property is surrounded by one-story commercial buildings.

Proposed Project Description
The Noyes Block Building is intended for renovations and upgrades to provide for new commercial occupancy at the ground floor and new office uses at the second floor. The proposed renovations and upgrades are generally regarded as rehabilitation and include the following tasks:
§ Restore the large interior space back to two smaller interior spaces, § Replace the existing pair of non-original aluminum-frame double doors at the north elevation with new aluminum-frame and glass doors partitioned for separate storefront entrances, § Replace non-original aluminum frame storefront windows on the north and west elevations with operable wood frame units,
§ Reveal original transom window openings along the first floor of the north and west elevations, § Install new period-appropriate wood-clad aluminum casement windows on the north and west elevations of the second floor,
§ Move the existing west elevation entrance north of its current location and install new periodappropriate windows where units historically existed, § Install ganged casement units at the second-floor south elevation, and § Remove the existing exterior stairs at the east end of the south elevation and construct a new exterior staircase parallel west side of the south elevation.

Methodological Approach
The methodological approach undertaken for this HRRR consisted of three major tasks - a site visit / field survey, archival research, and technical analysis. This report was prepared by Wendy L. Tinsley Becker, RPH, AICP, Principal. Ms. Tinsley Becker meets The Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards for Historic Preservation Professionals in the disciplines of History and Architectural History. Her resume is included in appendices of this HRRR.

Page 192 of 615 ends

Historical Resource Review Report | Noyes Block Building 8301-8305 La Mesa Boulevard, La Mesa, CA 91942
Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC | September 2021 | Page 2 Urbana completed the initial site visit in May 2021. The purpose of the site visit was to observe and photograph the building and the surrounding streetscape to understand and identify the architectural styles, character-defining features, building alterations and development patterns associated with the property and its environs. Representative views of the building and the adjacent properties were captured as part of field survey efforts.

Archival research included a review of relevant records and reference resources on file at the City of La Mesa, La Mesa Historical Society, the San Diego Central Library California History Room, and the San Diego History Center Research & Photographic Archives. Contextual and property-specific historical research included San Diego City and Suburban Directories, City of La Mesa building permit applications, Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps for La Mesa, San Diego Union Tribune, Evening Tribune, and La Mesa Scout newspaper archives, and County of San Diego Commercial-Industrial Building Records obtained from the County Assessor files. The La Mesa Historical Society provided a file of assembled research results, and additionally, a previous Historic Landmark study dating to 1997 and prepared by the La Mesa Historical Society, informed portions of this HRRR.

The first iteration of this HRRR was submitted to the property owner / project applicant in June 2021, and the proposed project was presented, informally, to City Staff at a pre-application virtual meeting held in July 2021. The purpose of the pre-application meeting was to obtain preliminary feedback from the City on historical resource concerns, and to discuss other aspects of the project outside the scope of this HRRR. During the July pre-application meeting, it was determined that additional design changes would occur with corresponding revisions to the project drawings in order to better demonstrate the proposed rehabilitation effort.

Page 193 of 615 ends

Historical Resource Review Report | Noyes Block Building 8301-8305 La Mesa Boulevard, La Mesa, CA 91942
Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC | September 2021 | Page 3 II. REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
Work proposed at the Noyes Block Building is subject to compliance with the City of La Mesa Municipal Code and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). This HRRR is concerned with whether the Noyes Block Building meets the definition of an historical resource pursuant to CEQA, if the building qualifies for inclusion on the California Register of Historical Resources and is eligible for designation as a City of La Mesa Historic Landmark, and whether the proposed rehabilitation and upgrades will cause a significant impact to an historical resource. Salient regulatory framework and significance criteria are outlined below.

California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR)
Pursuant to the CEQA PRC § 21084.1, any project that may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an historical resource is a project that may have a significant effect on the environment.

PRC § 5020.1(q) defines a “substantial adverse change” as demolition, destruction, relocation, or alteration such that the significance of the historical resource would be materially impaired.

CEQA requires a Lead Agency to determine if an archaeological cultural resource meets the definition of a historical resource, a unique archaeological resource, or neither. A historical resource is a resource that is listed in, or determined eligible for listing in, the CRHR; included in a local register of historical resources; or is identified as significant in an historic resource survey if that survey meets the criteria specified in PRC § 5024.1(g). A property may be eligible for listing on the CRHR if it is determined to meet one of the following criteria:

1. It is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of local or regional history, or the cultural heritage of California or the United States;or

2. It is associated with the lives of persons important to local, California, or national history; or

3. It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method or construction, or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values;or

4. It has yielded, or has the potential to yield, information important to the prehistory or history of the local area, California, or the nation.

Integrity and the CRHR
Pursuant to the California Office of Historic Preservation Technical Assistance Series #6, integrity is the authenticity of a historical resource’s physical identity evidenced by the survival of characteristics that existed during the resource’s period of significance. Historical resources eligible for listing in the California Register must meet one of the criteria of significance described above and retain enough of their historic character or appearance to be recognizable as historical resources and to convey the reasons for their significance. Historical resources that have been rehabilitated or restored may be evaluated for listing. Integrity is evaluated with regard to the retention of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association. It must also be judged with reference to the particular criteria under which a resource is proposed for eligibility. Alterations over time to a resource or historic changes in its use may themselves have historical, cultural, or architectural significance. It is possible that historical resources may not retain sufficient integrity to meet the criteria for listing in the National Register, but they may still be eligible for listing in the California Register. A resource that has lost its historic character or appearance may still have sufficient integrity for the California Register if it maintains the potential to yield significant scientific or historical information or specific data.1

Page 194 of 615 ends

Historical Resource Review Report | Noyes Block Building 8301-8305 La Mesa Boulevard, La Mesa, CA 91942
Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC | September 2021 | Page 4 The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation Rehabilitation is defined as the act or process of making possible a compatible use for a property through repair, alterations, and additions while preserving those portions or features which convey its historical, cultural, or architectural values. The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation provide the highest level of flexibility for alterations, reuse or adaptive reuse, and new construction at or in close proximity to a historic property. Following are the ten rehabilitation standards by which proposed projects are analyzed for the purposes of design review and CEQA and PRC impacts analysis.

1. A property will be used as it was historically or be given a new use that requires minimal change to its distinctive materials, features, spaces, and spatial relationships.

2. The historic character of a property will be retained and preserved. The removal of distinctive materials or alteration of features, spaces, and spatial relationships that characterize a property will be avoided.

3. Each property will be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or elements from other historic properties, will not be undertaken.

4. Changes to a property that have acquired historic significance in their own right will be retained and preserved.

5. Distinctive materials, features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize a property will be preserved.

6. Deteriorated historic features will be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature will match the old in design, color, texture, and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features will be substantiated by documentary and physical evidence.

7. Chemical or physical treatments, if appropriate, will be undertaken using the gentlest means possible. Treatments that cause damage to historic materials will not be used.

8. Archeological resources will be protected and preserved in place. If such resources must be disturbed, mitigation measures will be undertaken.

9. New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction will not destroy historic materials, features, and spatial relationships that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and will be compatible with the historic materials, features, size, scale and proportion, and massing to protect the integrity of the property and its environment.

10. New additions and adjacent or related new construction will be undertaken in such a manner that, if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired.

City of La Mesa Historic Preservation Program
In 1997, the Noyes Block Building was surveyed by the La Mesa Historical Society for the owners Garry and Carol Rosenberg as part of a local designation effort. The nomination asserted the building’s significance as an example of an early 1920s vernacular Two-Part Commercial Block, for its association with the builders Marker and Russell, and for its association with prominent La Mesans including the Noyes, Heller, and Grable families. The nomination was not reviewed by the Historic Preservation Commission and the building was not designated. The Noyes Block Building was additionally surveyed as part of the City of La Mesa Historic Resources Inventory (Updated June 3, 2021). The property, referred to as the La Mesa Drug Store, is annotated as a potential landmark but is not currently designated.2
The City of La Mesa General Plan Historic Preservation Element includes goals, policies, and objects for

Page 195 of 615 ends

Historical Resource Review Report | Noyes Block Building 8301-8305 La Mesa Boulevard, La Mesa, CA 91942
Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC | September 2021 | Page 5 historic preservation. Although the subject property is not referenced in the Historic Preservation Element, the proposed rehabilitation project is consistent with the City’s goals via compliance with The Standards for Rehabilitation.

1. Goal HP-1: Broadened recognition by La Mesans that the spirit and direction of the City’s growth is substantially reflected in its Historic Past. a. Objective HP-1.1: Broaden recognition and awareness of the processes and features of the La Mesa Historic Preservation Program.
i. Policy HP-1.1.1: Form partnerships and share information between the City and preservation advocacy organizations to foster and support local public history projects.
ii. Policy HP-1.1.2: Inform citizens and project applicants b. Objective HP-1.2: Update and maintain the La Mesa Historic Resources Inventory to identify the potential eligibility of properties built in the historic-era. i. Policy HP-1.2.1: Implement a phased Historical Resource Survey program that accounts for all locations in the City and all building stock that achieves the historic-era through time.
ii. Policy HP-1.2.2: Establish guidelines for identifying eligible properties in the Modern Period (circa 1935-1975) throughout the City.

2. Goal HP-2: Safeguarded heritage by preserving those elements that reflect our cultural, social, economic, and architectural history so that community residents will have a foundation upon which to measure and direct physical change.
a. Objective HP-2.1: Encourage retention and reuse of significant and / or historic-era building stock to safeguard heritage, promote material conservation, and provide for sustainable and green building techniques at historic-era properties. i. Policy HP-2.1.1: Develop guidelines on the architectural styles of La Mesa with corresponding character-defining features to serve as a threshold for local Landmark designation eligibility.
ii. Policy HP-2.1.2: Incorporate sustainability principles and green building practices at historic-era buildings and sites in a sensitive and complementary manner.
iii. Policy HP-2.1.3: Update the Resource Management Guidelines to account for The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation & Illustrated Guidelines on Sustainability for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings.

3. Goal 3: A strengthened economic base with stabilized and improved property values through the identification and protection of individual properties and historic districts. a. Objective HP-3.1: Advance traditional town planning techniques and urban design models consistent with periods of development in La Mesa that will strengthen livability and pedestrian opportunities.
i. Policy HP-3.1.1: Establish a historic context on the residential development history of La Mesa to identify potential historic districts based on residential subdivision tract map boundaries and relative to the greater architectural and planning history of community building.
ii. Policy HP-3.1.2: Establish Conservation Overlay Zones in Historic Districts to ensure appropriate use, density, scale, massing, and physical arrangement of existing and new buildings within Historic District boundaries. b. Objective HP-3.2: Further preservation incentives and benefits for La Mesa property owners, residents, and businesses.

Page 196 of 615 ends

Historical Resource Review Report | Noyes Block Building 8301-8305 La Mesa Boulevard, La Mesa, CA 91942
Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC | September 2021 | Page 6 i. Policy HP-3.2.1: Continue the Mills Act Historic Preservation Property Tax Abatement Program and provide ongoing monitoring of property preservation agreement terms and conditions.
ii. Policy HP-3.2.2: Continue to provide land use incentives that encourage property owners to designate their historical properties as Registered Historic Landmarks.
iii. Policy HP-3.2.3: Consider employing other implementation programs to support the management and preservation of local cultural and historic resources.3
City of La Mesa Historic Landmark (Local Register) Eligibility Criteria Pursuant to Title 25, Chapter 25.03, Section 25.03.010 of the La Mesa Municipal Code, a property may be eligible for designation as a Landmark or as a Historic District (or a contributing element therein), if it meets one or more of the following qualifying criteria.

A. Is identified with persons or events significant in local, state, or national history.

B. Embodies distinctive characteristics of a style, type, period, or method of construction, or is a valuable example of the use of indigenous materials or craftsmanship.

C. Represents the notable work of an acclaimed builder, designer, or architect.

D. Is identified with a person or persons or groups who significantly contributed to the culture and development of the city.

E. Embodies elements of outstanding attention to architectural design, detail, materials or craftsmanship.

F. An archeological or paleontological site which has the potential of yielding information of scientific value.

G. A geographically definable area possessing a concentration of sites, buildings, structures, improvements, or objects linked historically through location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and/or association, in which the collective value of the improvements may be greater than the value of each individual improvement.

Page 197 of 615 ends

Historical Resource Review Report | Noyes Block Building 8301-8305 La Mesa Boulevard, La Mesa, CA 91942
Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC | September 2021 | Page 7 III. HISTORICAL OVERVIEW
La Mesa
Founded in 1869 and incorporated in 1912, the lands comprising present-day La Mesa were initially within the boundaries of Rancho Mission San Diego de Alcala. The area was first settled in the American Period, in approximately 1868, when Robert Allison purchased property for use as a sheep ranch and other animal husbandry activities. The area’s natural springs provided ample water for the raising of livestock, and with the additional discovery of gold in the eastern mountains of Julian, La Mesa was recognized as a convenient stop for eastward movement of people and goods. Mr. Allison, with his landholdings, was able to take advantage of the speculative real estate activities in the progressive era.

Land speculation in La Mesa was also fueled by construction of the flume line that brought water down from the Cuyamaca Mountains, and the railroad spur line from San Diego to the East County. The flume was needed because, although spring water was available for livestock, there wasn’t sufficient water for more intense agriculture and real estate improvements. The San Diego Flume Company was formed in 1886, immediately raising capital by subdividing and selling land along present-day El Cajon Boulevard between Rolando Boulevard and Garfield Street. Robert Allison also donated 100 one-acre lots in the La Mesa town site to the flume company as a means of bringing much-needed water to the La Mesa area. In 1887, Robert Allison purchased construction bonds and granted a right-of-way to the new San Diego, Cuyamaca, and Eastern Railroad Company. By 1890, service was available from Lakeside to San Diego with a stop at the Allison Springs Station in the vicinity of present-day downtown La Mesa. By 1895, newspapers and periodicals referenced La Mesa as “Allison Springs,” “La Mesa Springs,” and “La Mesa Colony.” Into the early Twentieth Century the local economy expanded to include agriculture and citrus orchards with packing warehouses, health resorts, and limited film production facilities.

In 1906 Sherman Grable purchased 100 acres from D.C. Collier and subdivided the land, building his home as the first property. That same year, Grable formed a partnership with Charles C. Park and created the Park-Grable Investment Company. The company purchased 100 additional acres of land and divided all 200 acres acquired into 1,000 lots. On June 5, 1906, Grable and Park filed for two subdivision maps. One was Grable’s Addition which included the land south of La Mesa Boulevard and west of Nebo Drive. Filed as County Map No. 994, Grable’s Addition was created out of Lots G and H of La Mesa Springs, a portion of Lot 16 in Subdivision No. 4, a portion of Mount Nebo Tract, and a portion of the Ex-Mission Rancho. The second map was Park’s Addition, County Map No. 993, which lay south of La Mesa Boulevard and east of Spring Street. This addition was created from Lots E-G and I of La Mesa Springs and Lots 8, 9, and a portion of Lot 15 in Tract 12 of the Ex-Mission Rancho. To sell the lots, Grable and Park brought San Diegans out to La Mesa by train, bought them a free lunch at a local cafe, and gave them tours of the lots. Grable’s and Park’s Additions were advertised in The La Mesa Springs Scout as early as 1907. The subdivisions were advertised to draw San Diegans out of the crowed city to the new idyllic town of La Mesa. La Mesa was advertised as a beautiful, new clean place to live with all the new amenities including electricity, gas, sidewalks, and graded streets. Lots started to sell and by 1912 the population grew from 22 of the late 1880s to 700. February 16, 1912 the City of La Mesa was incorporated.

After La Mesa was incorporated in 1912, the city began to grow from a small suburban town into a thriving metropolitan city. La Mesa Boulevard (originally Lookout Avenue) was connected to the newly designated state highway which brought in more visitors and permanent residents. To serve the increasing commercial and automobile traffic along the road, downtown grew into a thriving business

Page 198 of 615 ends

Historical Resource Review Report | Noyes Block Building 8301-8305 La Mesa Boulevard, La Mesa, CA 91942
Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC | September 2021 | Page 8 district. In the 1911 Sanborn Fire Insurance Map, most of downtown was only developed between Spring and Palm Avenues and Nebo Drive (originally Railroad Avenue) and Date Avenue, adjacent to the railroad depot. The buildings were wood frame with porches and awnings extending out into the street attracting pedestrian or carriage traffic. However, the railroad and the connection to the state highway brought in more visitors and automobile traffic. By the 1920s, La Mesa saw the growth of larger commercial buildings such as the Two-Part Commercial Block along La Mesa Boulevard as in other cities around the US. By the 1929 Sanborn Map, La Mesa Boulevard north of Spring Avenue developed with new commercial buildings constructed of more modern materials such as brick, hollow brick tile, and concrete. The buildings are set back from the street for new automobiles dominating the streets. More storefronts geared towards autos also appear, such as mechanic garages and gas stations. The subject property was constructed during this era of new commercial growth for the city.

Signs were now a major part of the downtown commercial spaces to attract the pedestrian and the motorist, as seen on the subject property into the 1960s. 4 Construction of El Cajon Boulevard, around the time of World War I, provided for an alternative transportation route between San Diego and La Mesa, which caused a shift of development from the University Avenue corridor to El Cajon Boulevard. By 1930, La Mesa’s population increased to 2,500, however, because of the Great Depression, little growth occurred until the onset of World War II and beyond, when La Mesa, and municipalities throughout the entire state, experienced tremendous growth in the form of new residential tracts and suburban commercial centers. By 1940 the City’s population reached 3,912. Subsequent to WWII, La Mesa’s population increased exponentially, and the municipality was soon regarded as one of the fastest growing suburban cities in the San Diego region.5 Infrastructure demands and land annexations characterize the post-WWII period of La Mesa’s history with the development of comprehensively constructed residential tracts, improved with dwellings in a modernistic Ranch style, replete with new schools and shopping centers to support the growing population.

Residential neighborhoods developed along the University Avenue and El Cajon Boulevard corridors, and on the north side of the city along Lake Murray Boulevard and Baltimore Drive, housing stock and forms changed to reflect the rise of modernistic residential subdivision tracts modeled after the Urban Land Institute’s prescriptive development patterns in the Community Builders Handbook and consistent with major residential tracts developed in San Diego, including Linda Vista in the early 1940s and Clairemont in the 1950s. New suburban tracts developed in or annexed to La Mesa included Mount Helix Avocado Highlands, Fletcher Hills / Severin Manor, Rasonia, Rolando Knolls, and Vista La Mesa.6 These new communities were connected by major transportation corridors developed in the mid-tolate 1950s including State Routes 94 and 125, as well as the U.S. 80 Bypass and local thoroughfare Fletcher Parkway that spanned through La Mesa and into El Cajon to the east. Custom homes were constructed in the hills of Grossmont and Mt. Helix in the mid-century period with design attributed to noted Master Architects and Builders including Cliff May, Lloyd Ruocco, John Mortenson, and John Mock.

In 1943, La Mesa Mayor Ben Polak formed an ad-hoc group to create the Greater La Mesa Committee tasked with a visioning process for the future planning and growth of La Mesa. The first project promoted by the group was construction of a new War Memorial Auditorium to recognize La Mesan’s military service. Master Architects Alberto Traganza and Sam Hamill prepared drawings for a new War Memorial Auditorium; the construction for which was estimated at approximately $250,000. The high construction costs necessitated the committee to rethink their vision for the city with fewer than 10,000 residents.7 With an improved focus the Greater La Mesa Committee commissioned the design

Page 199 of 615 ends

Historical Resource Review Report | Noyes Block Building 8301-8305 La Mesa Boulevard, La Mesa, CA 91942
Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC | September 2021 | Page 9 and construction of a new Youth Center with surrounding recreation facilities at the city’s existing Memorial Park.8
By the early 1950s, student populations in La Mesa and the surrounding jurisdictions had peaked with a record enrollment of 3,000 at Grossmont High School. The overcrowding demanded an immediate solution in the form of two new schools opened in 1952, La Mesa Junior High School and Helix High School. New commercial developments were similarly plentiful, culminating in the 1961 opening of the Grossmont Shopping Center, the second regional mall built in San Diego County. As economical vacant land was consumed by new single-family neighborhoods, rising land costs in the older parts of town created a demand for higher-density cost-effective housing, which in the 1950s and 1960s resulted in the development of infill apartment buildings in and around established historic-era neighborhoods.

La Mesa Boulevard
Originally established as Lookout Drive, and renamed La Mesa Boulevard in 1940, this main commercial corridor serves as the anchor of La Mesa’s historic downtown core. By 1911, when the street was first mapped by the Sanborn Fire Insurance Company, the corridor was developed to include 48 buildings centered around the railroad depot at Railroad Avenue (now Nebo Drive). Development expanded north from the depot to East 4th Street and south of the depot to Date Avenue. The wood frame buildings housed 37 commercial retailers including a drug store, a cobbler, a bank, and three grocers, and 11 single family dwellings. In 1911, La Mesa Boulevard was also home to a movie manufacturing company at the far north end of the street. In the 1910s, La Mesa Boulevard was designed around the pedestrian: awnings and porch covers extended into the street for the passerby to walk under. There was no concern for cars at the time which allowed for this design.

By 1929, the Sanborn Fire Insurance Company recorded a sharp increase in development along La Mesa Boulevard including 83 commercial retailers up from 37 in 1911, 17 single family dwellings, and one church, St. Martin’s Roman Catholic Church. Development of La Mesa Boulevard expanded further west to Acacia Avenue with the largest concentration of buildings just north of the railroad and Spring Avenue. With the increase in automobile ownership, more commercial buildings devoted to the auto appeared in La Mesa in 1929 including 4 gas stations and 7 car dealerships / repair shops. Buildings along the boulevard were even designed with the automobile in mind with larger setbacks from the street and the removal or porches and awnings that extended into the road. Most of the new commercial buildings, including the subject property, were constructed of more modern materials such as brick, hollow brick tile, and concrete. These buildings housed stores that not only fulfilled people’s every day needs like in the 1910s but every day wants such as a barbershop, salon, jeweler, and a movie theater.

By 1949, the number of retailers along La Mesa Boulevard increased again from 83 commercial retailers in 1929 to 115 in 1949 still retaining similar functions and stores as in 1929. Another movie theater was constructed west of Date Avenue and two flats were constructed just east of University Avenue, the first multi-family units on La Mesa Blvd. In the mid-century and contemporary periods, incremental change occurred to the buildings along La Mesa Boulevard with new occupancies leading to façade improvements and storefront changes. In the mid-century, early 20th century buildings were updated with sleek and modern storefronts to match the new era of the sophisticated shopper. Stores constructed large, colorful signs to attract the motorist and pedestrian. In the contemporary period buildings have been torn down for newer buildings and structures meeting modern needs. The Noyes Block Building underwent changes of its own in the 1940s and 1950s to make it sleeker and more

Page 200 of 615 ends

Historical Resource Review Report | Noyes Block Building 8301-8305 La Mesa Boulevard, La Mesa, CA 91942
Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC | September 2021 | Page 10 modern; however, it has avoided demolition and continues to exemplify the commercial history of La Mesa Boulevard.

Noyes Block Building
In 1921, the Noyes Block Building was constructed for Charles H. Noyes on Lots 1 and 2 Block 3 of Park’s Addition. The Two-Part Commercial Block building was designed with two retail spaces on the ground floor along La Mesa Boulevard, originally 101 and 105 Lookout Avenue and later addressed as 8301 and 8305 La Mesa Boulevard, with Mr. Noyes’s drug store (and subsequent tenets) at 8301 and varying businesses housed within the second, smaller space at 8305. The building was constructed by La Mesa builders Marker and Russell, a partnership of David C. Marker and Henry Lee Russell. The building was erected at a cost of $20,000 and was constructed of concrete and hollow clay tile with stucco and brick on the exterior. Named the Noyes Block and officially opened in 1922, early newspapers described the building as “buff colored, 50 x 80 ft, featuring a 30 x 50 ft main room for the drug store with old ivorycolored walls, mahogany woodwork and fixtures, and woodstone floors.” 9 The drug store was an official Rexall Drug Store, which was a nationwide drug store chain for La Mesa and East County. One of the main features of the store during this period was a 14ft long soda fountain at a cost of $2,000. At the rear of the main room there was a balcony overlooking the main floor with offices for Noyes and Mr. C. F. Wilkins, an optometrist. The prescription department was located below the balcony and enclosed from the rest of the store. A dentist, Dr. Harry Block, rented an office near the stairway at the Palm Street entrance. The second floor was the residence of the Noyes family, reinforcing the properties classification as a Two-Part Commercial Block composed of ground-floor commercial and private uses at the second level.

The first owners of the subject property were Charles H. and Gertrude Noyes, who commissioned construction of the commercial building in 1922. The couple was originally from Houlton, Maine where they were married in 1903 and where Charles was a local pharmacist. In 1906, the family moved to California, first living in Alhambra and Santa Maria before moving to La Mesa in 1910. In 1911, Noyes was a member of the La Mesa Improvement Club along with other founding members of the city. In August 1912, the Improvement Club became the first La Mesa Chamber of Commerce, with Noyes serving as one of its original 15 members in 1912 and as President from 1915 to 1916. Noyes was also chairman of the La Mesa School Board in 1913, a member of the La Mesa Merchant’s Association in 1913, and part of a committee to negotiate with large motion picture companies about filming in La Mesa in 1915.10 By 1911, Charles purchased the existing drug store in the Hoedemaker Block at the southeast corner of Spring Avenue and La Mesa Boulevard. The store was named the Noyes Drug Company and remained in that location until 1922, when construction of Noyes’s new store was complete, officially opening the 8301-8305 La Mesa Boulevard property. The Noyes Drug Company occupied the 8301 La Mesa Blvd. retail space.

Gertrude died unexpectedly on December 7, 1922, and Charles remarried in 1924 to Cecelia Montgomery. After selling the building in 1924, Charles moved to San Diego and managed The Avenue Pharmacy on Adams Avenue until his death in 1942. In 1924, Charles Noyes sold the Noyes Block Building to C. M. and Maude C. Grable for $28,000. The drug business was sold separately to J. W.

Davis, a retired businessman who lived in Grossmont. From the time Noyes sold the business and the building separately, the ownership remained separate until about 1974. The ownership of the building will be described first, then the ownership of the drug store.

Page 201 of 615 ends

Historical Resource Review Report | Noyes Block Building 8301-8305 La Mesa Boulevard, La Mesa, CA 91942
Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC | September 2021 | Page 11 Clarence M. Grable owned the subject property from 1924 to 1932. In 1928, Mr. Grable renamed the building from the Noyes Block to the Grable Building and converted the second-floor residential space to offices, which would be occupied by various tenets throughout the building’s history.11 C. M. Grable was the brother of Sherman Grable and worked briefly with his brother in the Grable-Francisco-Bleifuss Company, a real estate developer in La Mesa and Spring Valley. When Mr. Grable purchased the building, he and his wife were living in Chicago, Illinois. Although a La Mesa Scout article reported the Grables planned to make their home in La Mesa, there is no evidence they moved to the city. He and his wife are not recorded living in La Mesa in the 1920, 1930, or 1940 United States Censuses but in Chicago and New York City and neither were ever registered to vote in La Mesa.

In 1932, Mr. Grable sold the building to Mathias F. and Lulu H. Heller. Mathias Heller, a native of Missouri, moved to San Diego in 1889. With Samuel Fox in 1905, he erected the Fox-Heller Building at the corner of 5th and E Streets in San Diego, no longer extant. By 1929, he had built a grocery business into a chain of 42 Heller Stores throughout San Diego County. He sold the chain in 1929 to McMarr Stores, Inc. and became president of the Heller Investment Company. In 1930, the investment company erected the Heller Building at 8295 La Mesa Boulevard, across the street from the subject property which he purchased in 1932 most likely as an investment property. Mr. Heller was a member of the San Diego Chamber of Commerce.

By 1936, the Hellers sold the subject property to William B. and Irene M. Nicholl. The couple separated shortly after they purchased the building. Irene maintained ownership through 1965. Irene Nicholl lived in La Mesa only one year and moved out of the county. During Ms. Nicholl’s ownership, several changes were made to the building, including addition of the green and black tile around the first-floor retail, construction of the awing and signs, removal and infill of the transom windows, and the merging of the two separate interior spaces (8301 and 8305) into one large retail space (8301). Refer to the Construction History section for additional information.

When J. W. Davis purchased the drug store business in 1924, he hired F. H. Keville to manage the business. In November 1926, San Diego pharmacists Edward A. Gaut and Roy F. Parker purchased the drug store business renamed La Mesa Drug Company. In 1927, A.H. Soulders and J. Mason Adams acquired the company.12 Souders came to California from Broken Bow, Nebraska where he had owned a drug store. Adams had been in the drug store business in Canada. By 1932, Andrew Murray Kellock, a pharmacist, had joined the La Mesa Drug Company as a junior partner and purchased the business in 1933.13 Soulders remained on to help run the company.

Mr. Kellock was a native of Calgary, Canada, where he had worked in his uncle’s pharmacy and graduated from pharmacy school. Mr. Kellock moved to the Wisconsin between 1910 and 1920 and married his wife Marion in 1931. Shortly after, the Kellocks moved to La Mesa, and Andrew began working for the La Mesa Drug Company. Kellock purchased the company in 1933 and ran it until 1967.

Until their first child was born in 1935, Marion Kellock was the drug store’s bookkeeper and was replaced by Grace Seborg, Mr. Kellock’s sister. In partnership with Irene Nicholl who owned the building, the two retail spaces (8301 and 8305) were merged into one large drug store in 1956. The contractors of the project were Jackson & Scott, and John Mortenson was the foreman on the job.14 Mortenson is recognized as a Master Builder by the County and City of San Diego and the City of La Mesa. In 1967, Mr. Kellock retired and sold the business to his chief pharmacist, Charles A. Etue. Etue continued as president until at least 1972.

Page 202 of 615 ends

Historical Resource Review Report | Noyes Block Building 8301-8305 La Mesa Boulevard, La Mesa, CA 91942
Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC | September 2021 | Page 12 In 1965 Irene Nicholl sold the building to Gladice L. Knudtson. Mrs. Knudston was a widow of the late Wilfred M. Knudtson, a La Mesa osteopathic physician and surgeon who died in 1964. He was the son of Martin Knudtson, a La Mesa pioneer. Gladice sold the property in 1974 to Lee F. and Geraldine Garich who owned the property for two years. Lee Garich was a pharmacist who had managed drug stores in San Diego for 20 years and was the president of the Ray Drug Company. It is uncertain whether Mr. Garich acquired any interest in the LMDC during the time he owned the building. This is most likely when ownership was merged between the building and the drug store business. Lee and Geraline Garich sold the building in 1976 to Monday Enterprises Inc. They sold the building in 1977 to M&M Investments who then sold it to Gary W. and Karen L. Green in 1994. The Greens sold the property in 1995 to the Rosenbergs, who owned the property until 2004 when they sold it to David and Linda Bucher and Charles Weinberger. Current owner, Tony Gaipa, acquired the building in 2020.

The secondary retail space at 8305 La Mesa Boulevard was separate from the larger drug store space until 1956. The first occupant of the 8305 La Mesa Blvd. retail space was the Updyke Café and Bakery managed by Claude C. Updyke. Mr. Updyke was originally from Michigan and moved to La Mesa from Tucson, AZ. He opened his first La Mesa bakery in 1920 in the Hutchinson Building but moved to the Noyes Block in 1921. On September 30, 1922, he married Gertrude Park, the chief operator in a local telephone exchange. He closed the restaurant and bakery in 1929 but opened a new location at Nebo Drive and La Mesa Boulevard in 1930.

The Updyke Café was in the 8305 La Mesa Blvd. space until around 1929, and it was followed by several retail businesses until 1956: Ballard’s Café operated by Viola Ballard (1929-1930), a restaurant run by Charles V. Reiffel (1932), a bakery owned by Earl Clayton (1933-1937), a bakery owned by Earl Logan (1938-1942), and the La Mesa Shoe House operated by Henry Hahn (1943-1955).15 The back of the building and second floor offices had various occupants throughout its history, who were not well documented over the years. According to the La Mesa Scout, in 1923 within the first-floor rear space Louis Massie Winn opened a branch of his Optometry office in the building; in 1924 Dr. A. E.

Floto opened a dental office; and in 1926, Dr. M. L. McPherren open a chiropractic office. When the second-floor space was remodeled into offices in 1928 its first occupants were Samuel A. Bristow, attorney; La Mesa Engineering Service, Blackwell and Edwards; R. H. Carson local representative of the Pacific Coast Building and Loan Co. of Los Angeles; and the R. E. Hazard Contracting Co. of San Diego through J. M. Vandenberge, local representative.16 John Canon opened a tennis and bike shop in 1935 and a Welfare Shop was operated out of the building in 1935.17 Marker and Russell Contractors
The Noyes Block Building was constructed by local builders Marker and Russell Contractors, comprised of David C. Marker and Henry Lee Russell. In the early 1910s, the two worked separately in La Mesa building some of the earliest homes in the Park’s and Grable’s Additions. By 1922, the pair advertised services as Marker and Russell.
18 Together the firm constructed the First Methodist Church of La Mesa, the subject building, and a multi-family property behind Sheldon’s Service Station at 4725 4th Street.

David C. Marker was originally born in Virginia in 1858 and moved to La Mesa around 1908. He was an early resident and founder of La Mesa having signed the petition to incorporate La Mesa in 1911. He served on the Board of Trustees for the First Methodist Church in 1929 and 1948. Marker constructed two identified local landmarks: the Orien Todd House at 8069 Vista Drive and the H.C. Park Home at 8069 Lemon Avenue. One of his larger projects was the first La Mesa Woman’s Club clubhouse in 1913, which is no longer extant. Mr. Marker passed in 1952.

Page 203 of 615 ends

Historical Resource Review Report | Noyes Block Building 8301-8305 La Mesa Boulevard, La Mesa, CA 91942
Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC | September 2021 | Page 13 Henry Lee Russell and his wife Emma were originally from Maine and moved to La Mesa in the late 1900s. Emma’s sister was Charles H. Noyes’s wife who constructed the subject property at 8301 La Mesa Boulevard. Mr. Russell helped organize the La Mesa Masonic Lodge in 1909 and was active in the the La Mesa Chamber of Commerce having served as Vice President in 1930 and Chairman in 1939.

Russell constructed houses along with two identified churches in San Diego County including the Lemon Grove Congregational Church, the First United Presbyterian Congregation. Mr. Russell died in 1945.

Page 204 of 615 ends

Historical Resource Review Report | Noyes Block Building 8301-8305 La Mesa Boulevard, La Mesa, CA 91942
Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC | September 2021 | Page 14 IV. ARCHITECTURAL OVERVIEW
Two-Part Commercial Block
The Noyes Block Building is an example of a Two-Part Commercial Block property type prevalent in the United States from the 1850s to the 1950s. The Two-Part Commercial Block is the most common type of small and moderate-sized commercial building generally limited to two to four stories.19 This type is characterized by a horizontal division into two distinct zones of interior uses: the public, commercial first floor used for shops, a bank, or hotel lobby while the private second through fourth floors was used for residences, hotels, or offices. On the exterior, the two divisions sometimes retain the same appearance but, on the inside, have different uses.

The Two-Part Commercial Block emerged in the 19th century replacing the shop-house form which was popular in the late 18th century and early 19th century after the American Revolution. The building functioned as a merchant’s house and his shop with the commercial purpose indicated on the outside.

The Two-Part Commercial block was an evolution of the shop-house form. It also had private and public functions and was similar in appearance; however, the Two-Part Block was taller with four to five stories and constructed in uniform rows or large blocks rather than individually like the shop-house form. The facades of the Two-Part Block were designed simply, reflecting the attitude of the time that commercial buildings were for practical functions. These early examples usually housed retail at street level and small offices, light manufacturing, or storage at the upper floors. The first floor was divided by closely spaced stone piers supporting masonry walls and windows above. These buildings were typically designed with little or no ornamentation.

The Two-Part Block evolved in the Victorian Era from the 1850s through the 1900s with more ornamentation added and larger scale.20 With the advent of technological developments during the Industrial Revolution, more ornate and detailed decorations could be made in mass quantity and shipped cheaply throughout the US. This allowed for accentuated cornices, decorative window surrounds or caps, string courses between floors, and masonry or cast-iron facades. The scale of the Victorian Two-Part Block was also larger with taller stories and larger facades occupying more street frontage. These buildings were also defined by larger plate glass retail windows which were made possible by the lower production costs of plate glass.21 The Beaux Arts and Revival styles were also common forms of Two-Part Blocks during the latter half of the 19th century into the early 20th century.

During the 1920s and 1930s, the Art Deco and Moderne style dominated the Two-Part Block design.

The Art Deco style did not use historical references as a basis for its design but rather designs that were seen as modern and innovative at the time. Facades were decorated with “rectilinear geometric forms, dramatizing more than actually reflecting the structure beneath.”22 Verticality was emphasized by piers spaced at regular intervals and extending the full height of the façade, and striations and abstract relief ornament the wall surface.23 In the 1930s and 1940s, Art Deco was defined by the façade’s horizontality through decorative banding, long stretches of windows, and rounded corners.24 The TwoPart Commercial Block falls out of function by the early 1950s due to design of buildings used entirely for commercial purposes rather than public and private uses combined.

Construction History
The Noyes Block Building, formally the La Mesa Drug Store, has experienced 6 construction campaigns described below. The original campaign was between 1921 and 1922 when the building was constructed as a Two-Part Commercial Block building with two separate storefronts: one large pharmacy on the corner and a smaller retail space on the right. All of the storefront windows were

Page 205 of 615 ends

Historical Resource Review Report | Noyes Block Building 8301-8305 La Mesa Boulevard, La Mesa, CA 91942
Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC | September 2021 | Page 15 open and large divided transoms were located above each storefront window. The first floor was clad in brick and the second floor covered with stucco. The wood awning does not date to 1922, and the signs originally hung at the corner of the building or from the facade.

The second campaign was around 1938 when a black tile veneer was added around the ground floor retail spaces either replacing the original brick or covering over it. The transoms over the smaller retail space, a bakery at said time, changed from divided lites to one large pane. Between 1938 and the 1950s/60s, the west elevation entrance at the rear and two paired sash windows were altered: one of the paired units was removed and the entrance moved to the window’s location. A small, fixed pane window was constructed north (left) of the new entrance while one of the paired units was retained.

The wood awnings and signs were constructed ca. 1945 during the third construction campaign from 1945 to 1949. The green and black tile was added around the first-floor retail spaces during this period, and the transoms were removed and replaced by units with a single pane. However, between 1949 and 1955 the transom windows were removed, and the openings were enclosed and stuccoed.

One of the largest campaigns was in 1956 when the two retail spaces were merged into one space for the La Mesa Drug Company. The entrance doors to the drug store were removed and a fixed pane window installed in its place. The entrance to the smaller space was replaced by a window, and between the two original entrances, a fixed pane storefront window was removed and replaced by the double front doors.

In ca. 1966 the west elevation entrance was enclosed and stuccoed over, and the large retail windows on the west elevation were stuccoed and small windows in two of the windows added ca. 1966.

Sometime in the 1950s or 1960s, the second-floor operable casement windows were replaced with fixed pane units with faux muntins.

The building underwent interior remodels in the 1970s and 1980s during the final campaign. Between 1978 and 1985 the large, paired sash window on the west elevation was stuccoed. Between 1985 and 2007, a small window on the second-floor west elevation within the rear porch was enclosed.

In the contemporary period, between 2009 and 2011 the La Mesa Pharmacy sign along the wood awning was removed. Between 2011 and 2015, the building was cleaned up on the exterior: new paint was added and the faux muntins were removed from the second-floor fixed pane windows. Between 2018 and 2020, two smaller aluminum frame tripartite windows on the west elevation within the original storefront window openings were covered with boards.

At an unidentified time, a paired casement window on the east elevation was enclosed. A photograph from ca. 1922 shows the paired casement window on the east elevation, similar in appearance to the windows on the north and west elevations at the second floor. Today the window is gone and enclosed.

Current Description
The Noyes Block Building, addressed as 8301-8305 La Mesa Boulevard, is a two-story, Two-Part Commercial Block in downtown La Mesa. The property sits at the corner of La Mesa Boulevard and Palm Avenue on the south side of the street. The building is rectilinear in plan with a flat roof. The exterior is clad in green and black tile veneer around the ground floor retail and stucco at the second floor. The building has a large retail space on the first floor, formally the La Mesa Pharmacy, and

Page 206 of 615 ends

Historical Resource Review Report | Noyes Block Building 8301-8305 La Mesa Boulevard, La Mesa, CA 91942
Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC | September 2021 | Page 16 offices on the second floor accessible from an entrance on the west elevation. The building is painted beige with dark green and mint green accents.

The north elevation along La Mesa Boulevard exhibits a generally symmetrical composition with aluminum framed double glass doors centered in the elevation recessed with two floor-to-ceiling fixed pane windows on either side that are angled back, which was a common feature in 1950s commercial architecture. On each side of the entrance are two fixed pane windows with aluminum framing. The windows are also recessed with the ledges covered in tile. Above the front doors and windows is a wood awning clad in stucco on the bottom. The awning is cantilevered out from the building and is additionally connected to the building by cables. The awning continues onto the west elevation. The first floor is covered with mint green and black tile up to the awning; however, above the windows but below the awning is clad in stucco.

The second floor of the north elevation is stucco-clad. Above the awning stucco framing is visible where the transoms were originally located. The green and black tile from the first floor extends up two small sections of framing above the awning onto the second floor. Four paired wood fixed pane windows are sited at the second floor. The windows are painted mint green while the framing is painted dark green. Above the windows is the original wood cornice with corbels painted dark green.

The west elevation faces Palm Avenue and has a similar appearance to the front elevation: tile on the first floor, stucco at the second, wood awing above the storefront windows, stuccoed transom windows, and a wood cornice. There are five openings where windows and an entrance once stood that are now stuccoed. At the rear of the west elevation first floor is a fixed pane window and a rear entrance to 4731 Palm Avenue, the office spaces upstairs. The entrance is recessed into the building, has one concrete step, and a wood paneled door. The second floor has a tripartite window at the far north end, four fixed pane windows, and one paired fixed pane window.

The rear (south) elevation faces a back alley. The first floor is clad in stucco with two entrances: one at the west end which is a flush wood door painted white and one is a brown metal security gate at the east end. A set of stairs run along the east side up to the second floor. They extend out past the elevation but are not accessible from the alley due to large stucco walls. The second floor is recessed back from the first floor. The western section appears to be an original porch with a separate shed roof, exposed rafter ends, and covered with contemporary-period vertical board siding. The whole structure is painted green. A paired fixed pane window and thin stucco chimney are adjacent to the porch on the right (east). At the east side is a small open patio accessible from an entrance on the east elevation.

There are three fixed pane units along the east elevation.

Current views of the building are included in Appendix B.

Integrity Status
Observation of the building’s existing features and comparison to its historic appearance reveals that the building has been gradually altered over time but still reflects its appearance from the 1922 to 1949 period of significance. Between 1922 and 1949, small changes were made to the building’s appearance such as addition of the wood awning and the green and black tile veneer at the ground floor. Since 1949, the building has undergone more alterations enclosing storefront windows, transoms, entrances, and rear windows. Although the building has undergone alterations, it still possesses enough integrity to exhibit its 1922-1949 period of significance as a Two-Part Commercial Block in downtown La Mesa.

Page 207 of 615 ends

Historical Resource Review Report | Noyes Block Building 8301-8305 La Mesa Boulevard, La Mesa, CA 91942
Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC | September 2021 | Page 17 • Location – The building maintains its original location on Lots 1 and 2 of Block 3 of the Park’s Addition at the corner of La Mesa Boulevard and Palm Avenue in downtown La Mesa. • Design – The building still retains integrity of design from the 1922 to 1949 period of significance. The building still retains the two-story, two-part commercial block appearance with separate functions on the ground and second floors. The building has the same rectilinear plan spanning the entire block from La Mesa Boulevard to the back alley. The original secondfloor porch is located at the rear with a separate shed roof and board siding. There are two separate wall materials to differentiate the first and second floors, the green and black tile at the ground floor and the stucco at the second. The only designs the building no longer retains from 1949 are the separate store fronts along the north elevation, open transoms, large storefront windows, and an entrance along the west elevation. A window on the west elevation of the second-floor porch was enclosed at an unidentified time. • Setting – Within downtown La Mesa, the subject property is still surrounded by a small-scale commercial setting as in 1922. Infill development and heavy alteration of 20th century buildings has occurred since that period, but the property is still within a commercial setting of one to two-story commercial buildings.
• Material – The Noyes Block Building retains several of its original materials such as the green and black tile at ground floor retail, stucco at the second floor, the wood awning with stucco and the connecting cables, and the wood cornice and corbels. The building does possess newer materials from the 1956 conversion to one, large storefront: the large storefront windows and entrance on the west elevation and fixed pane wood windows at the second floor. The rear entrance has a new door and an adjacent fixed pane window. • Workmanship – The building was constructed by La Mesa builders, Marker and Russell in 1922.

Alterations to the building such as the green and black tile veneer, wood awning, and single storefront have altered the building’s appearance from its 1922 appearance associated with Marker and Russell. Certain elements such as the two-part commercial design, massing, and placement of window openings still reflect their work, but overall, the individual materials do not reflect the original workmanship of Marker and Russell. • Feeling – The property still retains the feeling of a two-part commercial building in downtown La Mesa constructed in the late 1910s into the 1920s as part of the commercial development of the city.
• Association – With the alterations since 1922 altering the building’s appearance, the property possesses a low level of integrity of association with Charles Noyes. Mr. Noyes commissioned construction of the building in 1921 and the building was complete in 1922. Since then, the building has undergone alterations to its design and materials altering the building from its 1922 appearance when Noyes was associated with the building. The property still reflects some of the characteristics from Noyes’s period of association such as the overall two-part design and wood cornice. The building still retains integrity of association with Charles Noyes during the period of significance from 1922 to 1949.

Page 208 of 615 ends

Historical Resource Review Report | Noyes Block Building 8301-8305 La Mesa Boulevard, La Mesa, CA 91942
Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC | September 2021 | Page 18 V. SIGNIFICANCE EVALUATION
CRHR Criterion 1 / Local Register Criterion A
The 8301 La Mesa Boulevard property, the Noyes Block Building, was evaluated under the City of La Mesa Local Register and the California Register of Historic Resources (CRHR) and was found individually eligible under Local / CRHR Criterion A / 1 as it exemplifies the economic and architectural development of La Mesa in the 1910s to the 1920s. La Mesa began as a small town outside of San Diego in the late 1800s. With the construction of the San Diego, Cuyamaca, and Eastern Railroad between San Diego, La Mesa, and Lakeside, more visitors and residents were able to reach the town.

Residential development boomed in the area around 1906 when C.C. Park and S.C. Grable purchased and divided land in La Mesa Springs and advertised their lots to San Diegans. The company brought potential buyers into the city through the SCER Company, and their lots south of downtown sold quickly and were improved with houses for early residents. During this period, the town was still small.

Development of downtown occurred between Spring and Palm Avenues and between Nebo Avenue (then Railroad Avenue) and Date Avenue due to the close proximity to the railroad station. These sections were characterized by smaller wood frame buildings with porches and awnings at the front extending into the street for pedestrian traffic. During this early period, the buildings held essential services for a small town such as a bank, drug store (not the subject property), a feed store, tailor, grocer, and an undertaker, with the exception of a theater and a movie manufacturing business.25 This began to change when the city was incorporated in 1912 and La Mesa Boulevard (then Lookout Avenue) was connected to the new designated state highway. These two factors brought in more visitors and eventually more residents to the city. With the increase of traffic, population, and a need for commercial uses, the commercial area of downtown La Mesa expanded into a thriving business district. Downtown La Mesa expanded north of Palm Avenue to East Fourth Street and south of Date Avenue to Acacia Avenue.
26 The wood frame buildings were replaced by commercial buildings constructed of brick, concrete, and hollow clay tile and designed to accommodate the automobile. The buildings were set back from the street and no awnings or porches were constructed on new buildings extending into the road. For older buildings with existing porches, they were removed. The retail uses within the new commercial spaces were not only essential needs but also commercial wants such as a jeweler, a radio business, a barber, a fixtures store, and a candy store. Three new spaces were devoted to the automobile. Several of these new commercial buildings were examples of the two-part commercial block which began to appear in cities throughout the US from the turn-of-the-century into the 1950s. The two-part commercial block is characterized by a horizontal division into two distinct zones which reflects the use inside. The first floor at street level indicates public spaces such as retail stores. The second floor indicates more private spaces such as residences, offices, or hotel rooms.

Other examples of early two-part commercial blocks in downtown La Mesa are the Hotel La Mesa located at 30-34 Lookout Avenue which had a grocer and butcher on the first floor (public retail space) and a hotel on the second floor (private space). Another example of a commercial block is an unnamed commercial building at the southwest corner of Palm Avenue and Lookout Avenue, which possessed a similar appearance to the subject property.

The Noyes Block Building, formally the Noyes Drug Company, was part of this commercial development of La Mesa from a small town to a vibrant commercial city between the 1910s and the 1920s. The building is an example of a two-part commercial block building that appeared in La Mesa and other US cities at the turn-of-the-century. Noyes purposefully moved his business from a smaller wood frame commercial space to his new, modern Noyes Building, the subject property, as part of the new development of La Mesa. Therefore, the property is found eligible under Criterion A / 1.

Page 209 of 615 ends

Historical Resource Review Report | Noyes Block Building 8301-8305 La Mesa Boulevard, La Mesa, CA 91942
Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC | September 2021 | Page 19 CRHR Criterion 2 / Local Register Criterion D
The subject property also appears eligible under Criterion D / 2 for an association with Charles H.

Noyes. Mr. Noyes commissioned construction of the subject property in 1921 for his drug store business and as a residence for his family. Mr. Noyes was an early resident of La Mesa, moving to the city in 1910 after the first wave of development around the Grable’s and Park’s Additions. When he first moved to La Mesa, Noyes bought the existing drug store at the southeast corner of Spring Avenue and La Mesa Boulevard (then Lookout Avenue). Along with other founding members of the city, Noyes was a member of the La Mesa Improvement Club, which became the first La Mesa Chamber of Commerce in August 1912 when the city was incorporated. Noyes was one of 15 new members of the Chamber of Commerce and served as president between 1915 and 1916. Noyes was Chairman of the La Mesa School Board in 1913, a member of the La Mesa’s Merchant’s Association, and part of a committee to negotiate with large motion picture companies about filming in La Mesa. His business was part of the development of La Mesa, and even after his sale of the building, it became an important and lasting feature to the downtown area.

The property was not found eligible for its association with other previous owners as their significances are not associated with the building. Clarence Gable did not live in La Mesa and was not identified as a founding or important member of the city. He worked briefly for his brother Sherman Grable and his investment company, the Grable-Francisco-Bleifuss, but the extent of his involvement was not identified, and Sherman Grable had no direct connection to the subject property. The Noyes Block Building was not found eligible for its association with Mathias Heller as Heller owned the property for four years. Mr. Heller’s significance is connected to San Diego and his grocery stores in said city. The subject property was only an investment property for Mr. Heller. He constructed the Heller Building across the street from the subject property which carries more association and significance with him.

CRHR Criterion 3 / Local Register Criterion B and E
The Noyes Block Building was found eligible under Criterion B and E / 3 as an example of a Two-Part Commercial Block in La Mesa constructed in 1922 by Marker and Russell. The Noyes Block Building is an excellent example of a Two-Part Block with the public first floor with retail and the private second floor of offices and for a brief period an apartment for the Noyes family. Its location at the corner of Palm Avenue and La Mesa Boulevard further emphasizes its Two-Part Block character making the building more visible as oppose to it being on the interior of the block. When the building was constructed, it expressed the character of early Two-Part Commercial Block buildings with the defined cornice at the roof line and a subtle visual division from the first to second floor uses. The building also expressed little ornamentation.

Since 1922, the exterior has been altered, but these alterations underscore the building’s character as a Two-Part Block. Two-Part Commercial Block buildings were typically constructed in the mid-19th century and thus had to evolve with changes in tastes and styles overtime. In the 1940s, the green and black tile was added to the first-floor retail updating the commercial block to the new tastes of the 20th century. The black tile banding emphasized the verticality as was popular in the Art Modern / Deco styles of the time. The awning and large signs were constructed to attract the attention of the motorist speeding down La Mesa Boulevard, which was not a factor in 1922. The Noyes Block Building represents the Two-Part Commercial Block architectural style and its evolution over time to stay relevant with architectural tastes and modern technological advances.

Page 210 of 615 ends

Historical Resource Review Report | Noyes Block Building 8301-8305 La Mesa Boulevard, La Mesa, CA 91942
Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC | September 2021 | Page 20 Local Register Criterion C
The Noyes Block Building was not found eligible under Local Register Criterion C as it no longer reflects the work of Marker and Russell from 1922. With the material changes since the date of construction, the building no longer reflects the builders’ original design.

CRHR Criterion 4 / Local Register Criterion F
The Noyes Block Building, addressed as 8301-8305 La Mesa Boulevard, was found ineligible under Criterion F / 4 as further study of the property would not be likely to yield information important to local, regional, state, or national history.

Local Register Criterion G
Relative to City of La Mesa Historic Landmark Criterion G, should a historic district be defined for the Downtown La Mesa business core, the building would likely qualify as a contributing element, dependent upon the period of significance established for the district. However, observations of the immediately surrounding properties reveal numerous storefronts and building modifications such that the area may not qualify as a historic district, but could, pending the creation of appropriate governing language, be considered as a business conservation district with design guidelines in place for compatible new construction. The Noyes Block Building is not currently eligible under City of La Mesa Historic Landmark Criterion G.

Historical Resource Determination
The Noyes Block Building appears eligible under the criteria of the Local Register and CRHR as it exemplifies the economic and architectural development of La Mesa in the 1910s to the 1920s (Local A / CRHR 1), for its association with Charles Noyes (Local D / CRHR 2), and as an example of the Two-Part Commercial Block architectural style (Local B and E / CRHR 3). The building therefore qualifies as a historical resource under CEQA guidelines. As the building appears to be a historical resource, the proposed project will be evaluated for significant impacts in the following section.

Page 211 of 615 ends

Historical Resource Review Report | Noyes Block Building 8301-8305 La Mesa Boulevard, La Mesa, CA 91942
Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC | September 2021 | Page 21 VI. DESIGN REVIEW ANALYSIS / PROJECT IMPACTS
Proposed renovation and upgrades at the Noyes Block Building include converting the large interior store space back to two separate interior spaces for new commercial uses. The second floor will continue to be used for offices. The proposed renovations and upgrades are generally regarded as rehabilitation and include the following tasks:
§ Restore the large interior space back to two smaller interior spaces, § Replace the existing pair of non-original aluminum-frame double doors at the north elevation with new aluminum-frame and glass doors partitioned for separate storefront entrances, § Replace non-original aluminum frame storefront windows on the north and west elevations with operable wood frame units,
§ Reveal original transom window openings along the first floor of the north and west elevations, § Install new period-appropriate wood-clad aluminum casement windows on the north and west elevations of the second floor,
§ Move the existing west elevation entrance north of its current location and install new periodappropriate windows where units historically existed, § Install ganged casement units at the second-floor south elevation, and § Remove the existing exterior stairs at the east end of the south elevation and construct a new exterior staircase parallel to the west side of the south elevation.

Because the building qualifies for CRHR and Local Historic Landmark designation, the building qualifies as an historical resource. Consequently, the proposed project has been analyzed for compliance with The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation to identify if the project, as currently proposed, conforms to the standards or if design revisions are recommended to ensure that impacts can be mitigated to a less than significant level.

Refer to Figures 1-3 in the following pages for proposed elevations and applicant material board.

Page 212 of 615 ends

Historical Resource Review Report | Noyes Block Building 8301-8305 La Mesa Boulevard, La Mesa, CA 91942
Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC | September 2021 | Page 22 Figure 1. Proposed Elevations.

Page 213 of 615 ends

Historical Resource Review Report | Noyes Block Building 8301-8305 La Mesa Boulevard, La Mesa, CA 91942
Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC | September 2021 | Page 23 Figure 2. Period-appropriate wood-clad aluminum window detail. Second floor windows.

Figure 3. Applicant material board.

Page 214 of 615 ends

Historical Resource Review Report | Noyes Block Building 8301-8305 La Mesa Boulevard, La Mesa, CA 91942
Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC | September 2021 | Page 24 The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation Rehabilitation is defined as the act or process of making possible a compatible use for a property through repair, alterations, and additions while preserving those portions or features which convey its historical, cultural, or architectural values. The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation provide the highest level of flexibility for alterations, reuse or adaptive reuse, and new construction at or in close proximity to a historic property. Following are the ten rehabilitation standards by which proposed projects are analyzed for the purposes of design review and CEQA analysis.

1. A property will be used as it was historically or be given a new use that requires minimal change to its distinctive materials, features, spaces, and spatial relationships.

The building was developed as a two-story commercial building / Two-Part Commercial Block with ground floor commercial and residential units above. In 1928 the second-floor apartments were converted to office space. The ground floor originally featured two separate storefronts: one utilized as a drug store and the other housing various uses such as a bakery, restaurant, and shoe store. The two retail spaces were combined in 1956 and the entire ground floor continued as a drug store. The proposed project represents a continuation of use. The Two-Part Commercial Block form will exist as it has historically existed since original construction.

2. The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided.

The historic character of the Noyes Block Building will be retained and enhanced by the proposed project. Extant character-defining features that date to the period of significance (1922-1949) will be retained and repaired where possible and historic imagery has informed specifications for new periodappropriate wood-clad aluminum windows.

The existing seafoam green and black tiles, installed along the ground floor facades of the north and west elevations, will be damaged as part of necessary structural work that involves lifting the building to repair the foundation. New compatible 3” x 6” subway tiles, “Marazzi Arteko Green” and Gloss Black, will entirely replace the existing material, excepting ornamental vents (also ceramic tile in seafoam green) in the bulkhead. The project developer will attempt to retain these decorative bulkhead tile vents in place, or to remove prior to foundation work, and then reinstall at the original location within the bulkhead. Retention of these decorative pieces will offer a sense of historic materials at the storefronts and will give evidence of rehabilitation campaigns without conjecture. Excepting the bulkhead vents, wholesale replacement of the storefront facade tile is proposed to ensure continuity in color as a matching tile was not located for the existing seafoam green tiles. The selected Marazzi Arteko Green tiles offer speckled surfaces that may look aged at installation.

The project additionally involves continuation of stucco wall cladding at the exterior (in a smoother texture as visible in historic views), reintroduction of transom windows at the ground floor storefronts (these openings have been obscured from exterior view via stucco-cladding and by non-historic walls and soffit at the interior), introduction of historic window openings on the west elevation (where historically located and currently infilled), continuation of the existing mid-level canopy, retention of the original wood cornice and corbels at the second floor, and at the interior, retention of original column capitals that have been obscured from view by a dropped tile ceiling.

Page 215 of 615 ends

Historical Resource Review Report | Noyes Block Building 8301-8305 La Mesa Boulevard, La Mesa, CA 91942
Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC | September 2021 | Page 25 Historic spaces and features which characterize the property will also be retained and preserved. The first and second floors will retain separate uses of private and public uses. The historic / existing placement of all windows and entrances will be retained, except for those openings intended for restoration / reconstruction as discussed below in Standard No. 6. Alterations to the building will only occur to contemporary alterations and will restore lost features as discussed below in Standard No. 6.

Lastly, the proposed design calls for enhancement of the second-floor rear porch, currently clad in contemporary board siding with original window openings exposed at the interior wall. The porch massing will be retained, with original setback from the west elevation, and introduction of periodappropriate windows at the south facade where windows historically existed. The original appearance of these south-facing windows is not known as no images were identified for this facade; however, the new units are regarded as compatible. A new egress door will be installed at the east end of the south facade and a new exterior stair will be installed along both floors.

3. Each property shall be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use.

Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or architectural elements from other buildings, shall not be undertaken.

No changes will be made to the Noyes Block Building that will create a false sense of historical development. No conjectural features or elements will be added. All proposed work will be based on historic photos and documentation of the building from 1922-1949. If historic photos were not identified, work will be completed in a manner that is differentiated from the historical materials.

4. Most properties change over time; those changes that have acquired historic significance in their own right shall be retained and preserved.

The Noyes Block Building was initially constructed between 1921 and 1922 and has undergone changes to its appearance since that date. The period of significance for the building and the proposed project is 1922 to 1949, and the project will retain all changes to the property that have acquired historical significance in their own right during that period. These features include the green and black tile veneer on the north and west ground floor elevations added ca. 1949. This addition was early in the building’s history, and residents of La Mesa now associate the building with the tile. The tile is a contributing feature and will be damaged by necessary foundation work. New compatible 3” x 6” subway tiles, “Marazzi Arteko Green” and Gloss Black, will entirely replace the existing material, excepting ornamental vents (also ceramic tile in seafoam green) in the bulkhead. The project developer will attempt to retain these decorative bulkhead tile vents in place, or to remove prior to foundation work, and then reinstall at the original location within the bulkhead. Retention of these decorative pieces will offer a sense of historic materials at the storefronts and will give evidence of rehabilitation campaigns without conjecture. Excepting the bulkhead vents, wholesale replacement of the storefront facade tile is proposed to ensure continuity in color as a matching tile was not located for the existing seafoam green tiles. The selected Marazzi Arteko Green tiles offer speckled surfaces that may look aged at installation. The mid-level awning was constructed ca. 1945 and will be retained. The awning has become a part of the building’s identity and is historically significant in its own right.

5. Distinctive features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize a historic property shall be preserved.

Most of the distinctive features, finishes, and construction techniques that characterize the Noyes Block Building will be preserved as part of the project, including stucco exterior at the second floor,

Page 216 of 615 ends

Historical Resource Review Report | Noyes Block Building 8301-8305 La Mesa Boulevard, La Mesa, CA 91942
Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC | September 2021 | Page 26 retail window openings on the west and north elevations, mid-level awning, wood cornice and corbels, and column capitols (interior). New compatible 3” x 6” subway tiles, “Marazzi Arteko Green” and Gloss Black, will entirely replace the existing tile at the ground floor storefronts, excepting ornamental vents (also ceramic tile in seafoam green) in the bulkhead. The project developer will attempt to retain these decorative bulkhead tile vents in place, or to remove prior to foundation work, and then reinstall at the original location within the bulkhead. Retention of these decorative pieces will offer a sense of historic materials at the storefronts and will give evidence of rehabilitation campaigns without conjecture.

Excepting the bulkhead vents, wholesale replacement of the storefront facade tile is proposed to ensure continuity in color as a matching tile was not located for the existing seafoam green tiles. The selected Marazzi Arteko Green tiles offer speckled surfaces that may look aged at installation.

6. Deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall match the old in design, color, texture, and other visual qualities and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features shall be substantiated by documentary, physical, or pictorial evidence.

Overall, the subject property is in good condition and will only require minimum repair to original features. Any identified deteriorated features will be repaired unless the severity of deterioration warrants full replacement. The wood cornice and awning are in good condition and will not require repair. The proposed project includes restoring missing features from the 1922-1949 period of significance. These features will be replaced based on documentary, physical, and pictorial evidence.

The features to be restored, based on historic photos, include operable casement windows on the second floor within original / extant openings, the transoms above the storefront windows on the north and west elevations, the storefront windows on the west elevation, two entrances on the west elevation, and two sash windows at the rear of the west elevation. All features are pictured in historic imagery except the entrances which will be replaced as to not deter from the original historic features and to not create a false sense of history.

New compatible 3” x 6” subway tiles, “Marazzi Arteko Green” and Gloss Black, will entirely replace the existing tile at the ground floor storefronts, excepting ornamental vents (also ceramic tile in seafoam green) in the bulkhead. The project developer will attempt to retain these decorative bulkhead tile vents in place, or to remove prior to foundation work, and then reinstall at the original location within the bulkhead. Retention of these decorative pieces will offer a sense of historic materials at the storefronts and will give evidence of rehabilitation campaigns without conjecture. Excepting the bulkhead vents, wholesale replacement of the storefront facade tile is proposed to ensure continuity in color as a matching tile was not located for the existing seafoam green tiles. The selected Marazzi Arteko Green tiles offer speckled surfaces that may look aged at installation.

7. Chemical or physical treatments, such as sandblasting, that cause damage to historic materials shall not be used. The surface cleaning of structures, if appropriate, shall be undertaken using the gentlest means possible.

No chemical or physical treatments are proposed that would cause damage to historic materials.

8. Significant archeological resources affected by a project shall be protected and preserved. If such resources must be disturbed, mitigation measures shall be undertaken.

Page 217 of 615 ends

Historical Resource Review Report | Noyes Block Building 8301-8305 La Mesa Boulevard, La Mesa, CA 91942
Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC | September 2021 | Page 27 No archeological studies were completed as part of the HRRR process.

9. New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment.

The proposed project involves exterior alterations which will restore features that date to the 1922- 1949 period of significance, and related new construction that will not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The restored features and new construction will be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. The storefront window openings on the west elevation will be reopened and new wood frame single-lite operable units will be installed to better mimic original storefront windows while still offering increased ventilation and indoor-outdoor feel for the commercial space. These windows will be compatible in materials, massing, size, and scale to historic features but differentiated from the original features through the operable design.

At the front / north elevation, along La Mesa Boulevard, the building featured two separate storefronts in 1922-1949. The proposed project does not involve converting the front back to two storefronts as the sidewalk on the east (left) has been raised by 3” since 1922. Adding a storefront in that location would create a stepdown from the raised sidewalk, and the entrance would not be ADA accessible. To comply with ADA regulations, the current entrance location will remain in place, the existing double entry doors will be removed and two new storefront doors with clear anodized aluminum framing and clear glazing will be installed separated by a stucco-clad partition wall. On the interior, the large space will be converted into two separate commercial spaces, each accessible by one of the proposed doors.

Retaining the existing storefront entrance opening (while adding in two separate entry doors) does not affect the historic character of the building and will meet necessary ADA regulations. The existing nonhistoric fixed pane storefront windows on the north elevation will be replaced with new wood frame operable units. The new windows will be compatible in materials, massing, size, and scale to historic features but differentiated from the original features through their operability. The new windows raise up at the building interior to create an expanded sense of indoor-outdoor use for the ground floor space.

The original transom openings, above the storefront windows and mid-level awning on the north and west elevations, will be re-introduced / revealed and new windows with clear anodized aluminum framing and medium gray spandrel glazing will be added. These windows will be compatible in materials, massing, size, and scale to historic features and the original transom windows but differentiated from the original features through the spandrel glazing design. The existing windows at the second floor, north and west elevations, were installed in ca. 1950s-1960s within the original openings. These non-historic units will be removed and replaced by operable period-appropriate woodclad casement units designed for consistency with historic views of the original windows. The new windows will have the same four-over-one divided lite pattern but will be differentiated from the historic features by being constructed of wood clad aluminum framing with clear glazing.

Two side entrances on the west elevation will be restored as part of the proposed project. The entrance opening between the enclosed storefront window openings will be opened and a new door added. The rear entrance on the west elevation will be enclosed and moved north (left) on the elevation to its

Page 218 of 615 ends

Historical Resource Review Report | Noyes Block Building 8301-8305 La Mesa Boulevard, La Mesa, CA 91942
Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC | September 2021 | Page 28 original location. The door will be a clear anodized aluminum frame door with clear glazing, and the door will be lowered to achieve ADA compliance. As the entrance will be moved, the location of the interior stairs will also change. A non-original fixed pane window will be removed and replaced by a fixed unit in a two-over-two divided lite pattern with clear anodized aluminum framing and medium gray spandrel glazing, similar in massing to a previous window which was enclosed between 1938 and the 1950s-1960s. Another fixed pane window with clear anodized aluminum framing and clear glazing will be added to mimic an original window replaced between 1978 and 1985. The windows will be differentiated from the original windows through the aluminum framing and single pane.

At the rear of the building, the second-floor porch structure will be rebuilt consistent withs its historic massing and setback and shall be stucco-clad consistent with historic imagery. This re-built volume will feature an egress door and exterior stairs. The stucco walls that extend out from the building toward the alley will be removed, and along the building a trash enclosure will be constructed. An entrance on the left (west) will be enclosed for the new emergency stairs. The existing porch volume is proposed for replacement as it has been identified by the applicant as structurally unsound and not able to support the load of new beams intended for installation as part of seismic work at the building. As this is the case, to comply more closely with The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards, the applicant has attempted to rebuild the volume consistent with historic features, specifically massing, setback, and exterior wall cladding. An exact reconstruction is not proposed due to a lack of historic documentation. Thus, the new volume would not necessarily impair the integrity of the historic building, would not give a false sense of history, and would be differentiated from the older / original portions of the building.

The proposed project will not affect the surrounding buildings in Downtown La Mesa. The work will be isolated to the existing volume. The neighboring building at 8314 La Mesa Boulevard has not been identified as a potential historic landmark or district contributor by the City of La Mesa and will not be negatively affected by the proposed project. The building at the south side of the rear alley, addressed as 4719 Palm Avenue, has also not been identified as a potential historic landmark or district contributor by the City of La Mesa and will not be negatively affected by the proposed project.

10. New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired.

All new additions and adjacent or related new construction will be undertaken in such a manner that if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would not be impaired. The new doors and windows at the storefronts on the north and west elevations will be constructed within existing openings and will not change the form of the building if removed in the future. At the west elevation, the new entrance and windows are being returned to the original locations and will not affect the form or integrity of the building. The openings are still in place underneath the stucco and the new units will be added to the openings. The new addition at the rear where the porch is located will be tied into the existing structure of the building but will be undertaken in such a manner that if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired.

Page 219 of 615 ends

Historical Resource Review Report | Noyes Block Building 8301-8305 La Mesa Boulevard, La Mesa, CA 91942
Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC | September 2021 | Page 29 VII. REGULATORY CONCLUSIONS
This HRRR was prepared to analyze the historical resource status of the Noyes Block Building. Urbana prepared this study to inform City Staff, the property owner, and project design professionals of whether the building is eligible for inclusion on the Local Register or the CRHR, to determine whether the building meets the definition of an historical resource pursuant to Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines, and whether the proposed renovations will cause a significant impact to a historical resource.

The Noyes Block Building was identified as a potential Local Historic Landmark in the 2017 historical resource survey of the city, updated in June 2021. In this HRRR Urbana opines that the property is individually significant under CRHR Criterion 1 and Local Register Criterion A, Criterion 2 / D, and Criterion 3 / B and E. The building reflects the commercial development of La Mesa in the early part of the Twentieth Century, when the city was established / incorporated with a main street, Lookout Avenue, defined by wood frame structures, and later evolved into a commercial district, La Mesa Boulevard, characterized by One-and-Two-Part Commercial Block buildings. The Noyes Block Building is a good example of Two-Part Commercial Block architecture and is associated with Charles Noyes.

The property was part of the growth of La Mesa, being one of the new Two-Part Commercial buildings constructed during this era. The building has become a visual landmark in Downtown La Mesa and has avoided substantial alterations that have made several similar vintage properties unrecognizable. The Noyes Block Building was a long-standing drug store in La Mesa and has continuously served the commercial / retail needs of the city since 1922.

The Noyes Block Building retains integrity from the identified 1922 to 1949 period of significance, reflecting the original materials, design, and Two-Part Commercial Block style, massing, and division of uses. The building retains the feeling and association of a large Two-Part Commercial Block constructed in the downtown core of La Mesa.

Historical Resource Impacts
The Noyes Block Building meets the definition of an historical resource pursuant to CEQA. The proposed renovations were reviewed for significant impacts and compliance with The Standards for Rehabilitation. The proposed alterations will rehabilitate the building consistent with its 1922-1949 period of significance and will retain / maintain most remaining character defining features from within the 1922-1949 period. Other character-defining features will be replaced with period- appropriate materials that the applicant has attempted to match in-kind. Missing / infilled features will be reconstructed / re-introduced using historic imagery as a guide. Urbana’s research on the property, assessment of the period of significance, and review of the proposed project has resulted in the conclusion that the proposed renovations will not cause a significant impact or cause a substantial adverse change to the historical resource, nor would it impact surrounding resources.

Mitigation Measures
As no impacts to historical resources have been identified, no mitigation measures have been stipulated or required as part of this HRRR.

Page 220 of 615 ends

Historical Resource Review Report | Noyes Block Building 8301-8305 La Mesa Boulevard, La Mesa, CA 91942
Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC | September 2021 | Page 30 VIII. ENDNOTES / WORKS CITED
1 Office of Historic Preservation Department of Parks and Recreation, California Office of Historic Preservation, Technical Assistance Series #6 California Register and National Register: A Comparison (for purposes of determining eligibility for the California Register),
https://ohp.parks.ca.gov/pages/1069/files/technical%20assistance%20bulletin%206%202011%20update.pdf. 2 Historic Resources Inventory and Landmarks Table, Updated June 3, 2021, https://www.cityoflamesa.us/DocumentCenter/View/17482/Inventory-Table-2021-06-03. 3 City of La Mesa 2012 General Plan Update,“Historic Preservation Element”, Adopted July 9, 2013, HP-12-14, https://www.cityoflamesa.us/DocumentCenter/View/6201/07LaMesaGPHistoricPreservation-CD?bidId=. 4 Chester H. Liebs, Main Street to Miracle Mile, (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1985), 41. 5 James D. Newland and La Mesa Historical Society, Images of America – La Mesa (San Francisco, CA: Arcadia Publishing) 8.
6 Ibid, 93.
7 James D. Newland. War Memorial Building Not To Be, But Vietnam Monument Rose From Ashes. La Mesa Patch, May 8, 2011.
8 Ibid. 9 “New Drug Store Building Finished; Opening Saturday”, La Mesa Scout, February 3, 1922. Accessed through the La Mesa Historical Society.
10 San Diego Union and Daily Bee, 1913; “Merchants of La Mesa Backing Mayor Swanson”, San Diego Union, June 17, 1913; “Little Journeys to the Back Country”, San Diego Union, May 26, 1915. 11 “Grable Building is Remodeled as Office Structure”, La Mesa Scout, September 7, 1928. Accessed through the La Mesa Historical Society.
12 “La Mesa Drug Co. Store Purchased by New Residents”, La Mesa Scout, October 14, 1927. Accessed through the La Mesa Historical Society.
13 “Kellock Purchases Partner’s Interest in La Mesa Drug Co.”, La Mesa Scout, August 1, 1933. Accessed through the La Mesa Historical Society.
14 “Grand Opening” La Mesa Drug Co. Ad, La Mesa Scout, October 1, 1956. Accessed through the La Mesa Historical Society.
15 Donna Regan, Patricia Kettler, Dennis Tuttle, and Karna Webster, La Mesa Historical Landmark Nomination Form, La Mesa Drug Store 1921, December 2, 1997, 6. After leaving this location, Earl Logan moved his bakery one block west, where it remained for many years as Logan’s La Mesa Bakery. Logan went on to serve on the La Mesa City Council and was mayor of La Mesa from 1954 to 1956. 16 “Grable Building is Remodeled as Office Structure”, La Mesa Scout, September 7, 1928. Accessed through the La Mesa Historical Society.
17 “Canon Opens New Store in La Mesa”, La Mesa Scout, January 11, 1935. And La Mesa Scout, March 29, 1935.

Accessed through the La Mesa Historical Society.
18 Advertisement for Marker and Russell Contractors, La Mesa Scout, February 3, 1922, 5. 19 Richard Longstreth, The Buildings of Main Street: A Guide to American Commercial Architecture, (Washington D.C.: The National Trust for Historic Preservation, 1987), 24. 20 Ibid, 29-31. 21 Ibid, 31. 22 Ibid. 46. 23 Ibid. 24 Ibid, 49. 25 1911 Sanborn Fire Insurance Map. Accessed through the San Diego Public Library and ProQuest Digital Sanborn Maps.
26 1929 Sanborn Fire Insurance Map. Accessed through the San Diego Public Library and ProQuest Digital Sanborn Maps.

Page 221 of 615 ends

Page 222 of 615 ends

Historical Resource Review Report | Noyes Block Building 8301-8305 La Mesa Boulevard, La Mesa, CA 91942
Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC | September 2021 | Attachment A. Building Records The 8301 La Mesa Boulevard property was included in the 1985 Historical Resource Survey of La Mesa. Source: City of La Mesa.

Page 223 of 615 ends

Page 224 of 615 ends

Page 225 of 615 ends

Historical Resource Review Report | Noyes Block Building 8301-8305 La Mesa Boulevard, La Mesa, CA 91942
Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC | September 2021 | Attachment B. Historic and Current Views 1922 view of the subject of the subject property known as the Noyes Building. The larger retail space housed the Noyes Drug Store while the smaller space featured Updyke Café and Bakery. The photo shows the building with a brick veneer around the ground floor and the transoms still open.

Source: La Mesa Historical Society.

Page 226 of 615 ends

Source: La Mesa Scout, July 14, 1922.

Page 227 of 615 ends

Historical Resource Review Report | Noyes Block Building 8301-8305 La Mesa Boulevard, La Mesa, CA 91942
Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC | September 2021 | Attachment B. Historic and Current Views Ca. 1922 view of the subject property on the left. The photo shows a casement window on the east elevation before it was enclosed.

Source: San Diego History Center.

Page 228 of 615 ends

The subject property is pictured at the center with the “Drugs” sign. 1928.

Source: La Mesa Historical Society.

Page 229 of 615 ends

Page 230 of 615 ends

Historical Resource Review Report | Noyes Block Building 8301-8305 La Mesa Boulevard, La Mesa, CA 91942
Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC | September 2021 | Attachment B. Historic and Current Views 1938 of the subject property known as the La Mesa Drug Store at the time. The building featured black tile at the store front.

Source: La Mesa Historical Society.

Page 231 of 615 ends

Page 232 of 615 ends

Source: La Mesa Historical Society.

Page 233 of 615 ends

Historical Resource Review Report | Noyes Block Building 8301-8305 La Mesa Boulevard, La Mesa, CA 91942
Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC | September 2021 | Attachment B. Historic and Current Views 1960s view of the subject property showing the transoms, west elevation windows, and west elevation entrance enclosed. Within two of the west elevation window openings are smaller storefront windows. The second-floor windows were also replaced with fixed pane units.

Source: La Mesa Historical Society.

Page 234 of 615 ends

Source: La Mesa Historical Socierty.

Page 235 of 615 ends

Source: La Mesa Historical Society.

Page 236 of 615 ends

Source: La Mesa Historical Society.

Page 237 of 615 ends

Source: La Mesa Historical Society.

Page 238 of 615 ends

Source: La Mesa Historical Society.

Page 239 of 615 ends

Source: La Mesa Historical Society.

Page 240 of 615 ends

Photo 2: View south of the north elevation facing La Mesa Blvd.

Page 241 of 615 ends

Photo 4: View southeast of the west elevation.

Page 242 of 615 ends

Photo 6: View east of the west elevation showing the altered entrance and fixed pane window.

Page 243 of 615 ends

Photo 8: View north of the south elevation along the alley showing the stair addition on the right.

Page 244 of 615 ends

Photo 10: Detail of the west elevation windows from 1956 and the enclosed transoms above.

Page 245 of 615 ends

Photo 12: Detail of the west elevation entrance and fixed pane windows.

Page 246 of 615 ends

Page 247 of 615 ends

Page 248 of 615 ends

Page 249 of 615 ends

Page 250 of 615 ends

Page 251 of 615 ends

Page 252 of 615 ends

Page 253 of 615 ends

Page 254 of 615 ends

Historical Resource Review Report | Noyes Block Building 8301-8305 La Mesa Boulevard, La Mesa, CA 91942
Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC | September 2021 | Attachment B. Historic and Current Views Photo 21: Detail of a fixed pane window next to the entrance on the west elevation added between 1938 and the 1950s/1960s.

Page 255 of 615 ends

Page 256 of 615 ends

Photo 24: Detail of the boarded west elevation windows and tile.

Page 257 of 615 ends

Historical Resource Review Report | Noyes Block Building 8301-8305 La Mesa Boulevard, La Mesa, CA 91942
Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC | September 2021 | Attachment C. Occupant Information APPENDIX C. OCCUPANT INFORMATION

Page 258 of 615 ends

8301 La Mesa Boulevard Building Ownership
Date Owner Source
1921-1924 Charles H. Noyes
Gertrude Noyes
La Mesa Scout, 1921
1924-1932 C.M. Grable
Maude C. Grable
La Mesa Scout, 1924
1932-1936 Mathias F. Heller
Lulu A. Heller
1997 Landmark Nomination
1936 William B. Nicholl 1998 Landmark Nomination
1936-1965 Irene M. Nicholl 1999 Landmark Nomination
1965-1974 Gladice L. Knudtson 2000 Landmark Nomination
1974-1976 Lee F. Garich
Geraldine Garich
2001 Landmark Nomination
1976-1977 Monday Enterprises Inc. 2002 Landmark Nomination 1977-1994 M&M Investments San Diego County Assessor
1994-1995 Gary W. Green
Karen L. Green
San Diego County Assessor
1995-2004 Garry L. Rosenberg
Carol A. Rosenberg
San Diego County Assessor
2004-2020 David Bucher
Linda Bucher
Charles E. Weinberger
San Diego County Assessor
2020-Present Antonio Gaetano Gaipa San Diego County Assessor 8301 La Mesa Blvd. Drug Store Retail Space Ownership
Date Owner Source
1923-1926 J.W. Davis La Mesa Scout, 1923
1926-1927 Edward A. Gaut
Roy F. Parker
La Mesa Scout, 1926
1927-1933 A.H. Souders
J. Mason Adams
La Mesa Scout, 1927
1933-1967 A. Murray Kellock La Mesa Scout, 1933
1967-1974 Charles A. Etue La Mesa Scout, 1967

Page 259 of 615 ends

8301 La Mesa Blvd. (101 Lookout Avenue) Occupancy
Date Occupant Source
1922-1925 Noyes Drug Company 1997 Landmark Nomination
Form
1926-2007 La Mesa Drug Company San Diego City Directory La Mesa Scout, 1927
2007-2019 La Mesa Pharmacy Google Street View
2020-Present Vacant Google Street View
8305 La Mesa Blvd. (105 Lookout Avenue) Occupancy
Date Occupant Source
1922-1928 Updyke Bakery San Diego City Directory
1929-1931 Ballard's Café (Viola Ballard) San Diego City Directory 1932 Restaurant - Charles V. Reiffel San Diego City Directory 1933-1937 Earl R. Clayton - Baker San Diego City Directory 1938-1942 Earl Logan - Baker San Diego City Directory
1943-1955 La Mesa Shoe House (Henry Hahn) San Diego City Directory 1956 Two retail spaces merge into 8301 La
Mesa Blvd.

La Mesa Scout, 1956

Page 260 of 615 ends

Historical Resource Review Report | Noyes Block Building 8301-8305 La Mesa Boulevard, La Mesa, CA 91942
Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC | September 2021 | Attachment D. Preparer Qualifications APPENDIX D. PREPARER QUALIFICATIONS

Page 261 of 615 ends

Ashley Losco, MSHP
Historian / Preservation Planner
[email protected]
Historian / Preservation Planner, Ashley Losco, holds a Master of Science in Historic Preservation from the University of Pennsylvania, and a Bachelor of Arts in History from Florida State University.

Ashley meets The Secretary of the Interior's Historic Preservation Professional Qualifications Standards in the disciplines of History and Architectural History. She is experienced in conducting conditions assessments, completing historic sites inventories, writing historic district nominations, and preparing Historic Structure Reports (HSR), including preparation of an HSR for the Garden Room at Taliesin West, Frank Lloyd Wright’s home and school located outside of Scottsdale, Arizona. Prior to joining Urbana, Ashley worked for the City of Philadelphia Planning Commission where she performed contextual and propertyspecific historic research, documented existing conditions of established and potential historic districts, prepared historic site nominations, and performed quality control reviews for local nomination packages. She additionally worked for the Northeast Regional Office of the National Park Service, within the Historic Structures Research and Documentation Unit, where she completed conditions assessments for the Black Stone River Valley National Historical Park, the Gateway National Recreation Area, and the Old Slater Mill National Historic Landmark. Ms. Losco brings field survey and research experience in urban, rural, and open space settings, and in documenting cultural landscapes.

SELECT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
In-progress Southern California Edison Company Transmission Line Rating Remediation Program Historic-Era Built Environment Survey Report – Eldorado-PisgahLugo Transmission Line Project, San Bernardino County, California and Clark County Nevada
In-progress Southern California Edison Company Transmission Line Rating Remediation Program Historic-Era Built Environment Survey Report – Ivanpah-Control Transmission Line Project, Inyo, Kern, and San Bernardino Counties, California
In-progress Southern California Edison Company Transmission Line Rating Remediation Program Historic-Era Built Environment Survey Report – Kern River to Los Angeles Transmission Line Project, Kern and Los Angeles Counties, California In-progress Norco Egg Ranch HABS Documentation, Norco, CA In-progress 3649 Front Street Mills Act Application and Rehabilitation Plan, San Diego, CA
In-progress 7345 Remley Place Mills Act Application and Rehabilitation Plan, San Diego, CA
In-progress 3611 Hyacinth Drive Historic Resource Research Report, San Diego, CA 2020 1135 Devonshire Drive Historic Resource Research Report, San Diego, CA 2020 Determination of Historic Significance, 711 F Avenue, City of Coronado, Coronado, CA
2020 3575 Via Flores Historic Resource Research Report, San Diego, CA 2020 1610 Santa Barbara Street Historic Resource Research Report, San Diego, CA 2020 4630 Date Street Historic Designation & Mills Act Application, La Mesa, CA 2020 Red Fox Room Retroactive Historic Resource Research Report, JCG Development, Inc., San Diego, CA

EDUCATION
Master of Science – Historic
Preservation,
School of Design
University of Pennsylvania
Graduate Thesis:

Historic Structure Report: Taliesin
West Garden Room
—
Bachelor of Arts – History
Florida State University
Museum Studies Minor

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
Historian / Preservation Planner:

Urbana Preservation & Planning,
LLC (San Diego, CA) 2019-present
—
Community Planning Preservation
Intern: Philadelphia City Planning
Commission (Philadelphia, PA)
2018-2019
—
Historic Structures Research and
Documentation Office Intern:

National Park Service Northeast
Regional Office (Lowell, MA) 2018
—
DC Small Parks Cultural Landscape
Intern: University of Pennsylvania
with the National Park Service
(Philadelphia, PA) 2018
—
Research Intern: University of
Pennsylvania (Philadelphia, PA)
2017-2018
__
Easements and Database Intern:

Florida Trust for Historic
Preservation (Tallahassee, FL)
2017

Page 262 of 615 ends

Ashley Losco, MSHP
Historian / Preservation Planner
[email protected]
2020 Determination of Historic Significance, 300 F Avenue, City of Coronado, Coronado, CA
2020 Determination of Historic Significance, 518 Adella Lane, City of Coronado, Coronado, CA
2020 Determination of Historic Significance, 300 G Street, City of Coronado, Coronado, CA
2020 Determination of Historic Significance, 135 B Avenue, City of Coronado, Coronado, CA
2020 Historic Resource Research Report, 1020 Prospect Street – The Muse, La Jolla, CA
2020 Historic Property Survey Report, Rancho Miramonte Project, Chino, CA 2020 Historic Site Designation Report, 4350 Nabal Drive, La Mesa, CA 2020 Historic Resource Research Report, 4630 Date Avenue, La Mesa, CA 2020 Historic Resource Research Report, 2956 Roosevelt Street, Carlsbad, CA 2020 Mills Act Application and Rehab Plan, 552 Rushville Street, La Jolla, CA 2020 Mills Act Application and Rehab Plan, 1025 Devonshire Drive, La Mesa, CA 2020 Historic Resource Research Report, The Prospect Center Building, 1020 Prospect Street, La Jolla, CA
2020 Culverwell and Taggart’s Historic District Nomination Package, City of San Diego, San Diego, CA
2020 Arizona Street Tract Historic District Nomination Package, City of San Diego, San Diego, CA
2020 Limited Conditions Assessment and Historic Resource Research Report, 8445 Avenida de las Ondas, San Diego, CA
2020 Middle Ranch Pipeline Historic Resource Analysis Report, Santa Catalina Island, CA
2020 Determination of Historic Significance, 800 1st Street, City of Coronado, Coronado, CA
2020 Determination of Historic Significance, 610 10th Street, City of Coronado, Coronado, CA
2020 Determination of Historic Significance, 277 B Avenue, City of Coronado, Coronado, CA
2019 Determination of Historic Significance, 365 Glorietta Place, City of Coronado, Coronado, CA
2019 Determination of Historic Significance, 1325 6th Street, City of Coronado, Coronado, CA
2019 Determination of Historic Significance, 400 2nd Street, City of Coronado, Coronado, CA
2019 Historic Resource Research Report, 2561 1st Avenue, San Diego, CA 2019 Determination of Historic Significance, 275 J Avenue, City of Coronado, Coronado, CA
2019 Determination of Historic Significance, 911 F Avenue, City of Coronado, Coronado, CA

Page 263 of 615 ends

Ashley Losco, MSHP
Historian / Preservation Planner
[email protected]
2019 Determination of Historic Significance, 456 Orange Avenue, City of Coronado, Coronado, CA
2019 Determination of Historic Significance, 468 A Avenue, City of Coronado, Coronado, CA
2019 Determination of Historic Significance, 924 D Avenue, City of Coronado, Coronado, CA
2019 Determination of Historic Significance, 790 G Avenue, City of Coronado, Coronado, CA
2019 Determination of Historic Significance, 241-243 F Avenue, City of Coronado, Coronado, CA
2019 Pedley Powerhouse Historical Resource Analysis Report, Norco, CA 2019 Church of God Bulletin 580 Package, 5930 Division Street, San Diego, CA 2019 South Strawberry Mansion Historic District Nomination, Philadelphia, PA 2018 Conditions Assessment for McKerrow School, Detroit, MI 2018 Black Stone River Valley National Historical Park Conditions Assessment, National Park Service Unit (Rhode Island / Massachusetts) 2018 Gateway National Recreation Area Conditions Assessment, National Park Service (New York City / New Jersey)
2018 Slater Historic Textile Mill Window Conditions Assessment, National Park Service (Pawtucket, Rhode Island)
2018 Virginia Avenue Small Parks Documentation, DC Small Parks Cultural Landscape, Virginia Ave, NW, Washington, DC

Page 264 of 615 ends

Wendy L. Tinsley Becker, RPH, AICP, Principal
Architectural Historian + Urban / Preservation Planner
[email protected]
Founding Principal, Wendy L. Tinsley Becker, RPH, AICP, brings an expert background in American history, architecture, and urban planning, with a particular emphasis on issues relating to historic preservation. Her experience includes extensive historical resources survey work, design review under The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties, single-site historic property research and documentation, and practice in municipal regulatory planning and cultural resources compliance issues including code compliance, revision and review, CEQA, NEPA, and Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. As a preservation-planning consultant she participates in the development and administration of local land use regulations, policies, programs and projects; prepares reports involving research and analysis of various planning issues; conducts site-specific project and design review; and facilitates project coordination between contractors, architects, developers, citizens and other stakeholders. Wendy meets the Secretary of the Interior's Historic Preservation Professional Qualifications Standards in the disciplines of History and Architectural History and the draft standards established for Historic Preservation and Land Use/Community Planning. She is included on the California Council for the Promotion of History’s Register of Professional Historians and also maintains professional certification in the American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP).

Wendy is a co-author and editor of the AICP Certified Urban Designer Exam Study Guide (V1.0) released in March 2016. From 2013 forward she has provided professional training to AICP exam applicants as part of the American Planning Association California Chapter – San Diego Section annual exam training program.

Wendy has assisted municipalities, utility providers, and lead agencies in preservation planning program development and implementation efforts. She regularly consults for private and agency applicants on historical resource and historic property analysis for discretionary projects and undertakings pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the California Environmental Quality Act, as well as Federal Rehabilitation Tax Credit proposals at National Register listed or eligible properties, which are subject to review by the State Office of Historic Preservation and the National Park Service. She was the author / facilitator and lead historic preservation consultant for the City of Chula Vista’s award-winning Municipal Preservation Planning Program. She authored the Historic Preservation Element for the City of La Mesa’s award winning 2011 / 2030 General Plan update process. She provides survey, architectural history, context development, programmatic agreement, and historic preservation planning consulting services for the Southern California Edison Company including preparation of a programmatic guide for the treatment of all historic-era properties in the company’s 55,000 square mile service territory. She served as the lead Architectural Historian for the City and County of Honolulu High Capacity Transit Corridor Project’s Kako’o (Section 106 Programmatic Agreement Program manager) consultant team. Wendy’s professional analysis and determinations are reviewed for compliance and concurrence by numerous municipalities, and state and federal agencies including the California State Office of Historic Preservation, the California Public Utilities Commission, the USDA Forest Service, the Bureau of Land Management, and the National Park Service.

Her current interests include facilitating approvals for brick and mortar construction and building rehabilitation projects, and working with community-based organizations that emphasize public participation while striving for the improvement of the built environment through good urban and architectural design and associated social programs.

EDUCATION
Master of City Planning,
Preservation & Urban Design Emphasis
San Diego State University
—
Bachelor of Arts – History
San Diego State University

REGISTRATIONS
American Institute of Certified Planners
(#022838)
Register of Professional Historians
(#612)

EXPERIENCE
2005-present: Founding Principal
Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC
—
2012-present: Faculty Lecturer
San Diego State University
City Planning Graduate Program
—
2006-2017: Faculty Instructor
University of California, San Diego
Urban Planning & Development Program
—
2002-2005: Historian / Planner
Architectural Resources Group
—
2001-2002: Historian / Planner
Historic Research Services
—
2000-2001: Historian
Office of Marie Burke Lia, Esq.
—
1996-1999: Asst. Coordinator +
Researcher:

SHPO/CHRIS
South Coastal Information Center

Page 265 of 615 ends

Wendy L. Tinsley Becker, RPH, AICP, Principal
Architectural Historian + Urban / Preservation Planner
[email protected]
PROJECT EXPERIENCE*
2021 Historic Resource Research Report: 4070-72 Georgia Street, San Diego, CA. 2021 Transmission Line Rating & Remediation Project, Ivanpah Control Line, Archival Research Package, Southern California Edison, Southern California. 2021 4055 Lytle Street – Getchell Ranch / The Stone House Historic American Building Record (HABS) Level II Documentation, Fontana, CA. 2021 Norco Egg Ranch Historic American Building Record (HABS) Level II Documentation, Norco, CA.
2021 East Gilman Channel Historic American Engineering Record (HAER) & Monument Consulting, Banning, CA.
2021 Historic Resource Analysis Report: 3611 Hyacinth Drive Historic Designation Package, San Diego, CA.
2021 Historic Resource Analysis Report: 2675 Clove Street Historic Designation Package, San Diego, CA.
2021 7345 Remley Place Mills Act Application and Rehabilitation Plan, San Diego, CA.
2021 3629 Front St Mills Act Application and Rehabilitation Plan, San Diego, CA. 2021 Southern California Edison Company Transmission Line Rating and Remediation Program Ivanpah-Control Transmission Corridor, Historic-Era Built Environment Survey Report.
2020 Historic Resource Research Report: Historic Designation & Mills Act Package, 1135 Devonshire Drive, San Diego, CA.
2020 Historic Resource Research Report: Historic Designation Package, 3575 Via Flores, San Diego, CA.
2020 Historic Resource Analysis Report and CA DPR Forms, Archibald and Schaefer RV Park, City of Ontario, CA.
2020 Historic Resource Research Report: Historic Designation & Mills Act Package, 2275 Evergreen Street, San Diego, CA.
2020 Historic Resource Research Report: Historic Designation & Mills Act Package, 9434 Sierra Vista Drive, La Mesa, CA.
2020 Historic Resource Analysis Report: CEQA Evaluation and CA DPR Forms, Mira Loma Quartermaster Depot, Rutan & Tucker, LLP, Jurupa Valley, CA. 2020 Historical Resource Evaluation Memorandum & CA DPR Forms, Ontario RV Storage Mitigated Negative Declaration, Ontario, CA.
2020 Historic Resource Research Report: Historic Designation 1610 Santa Barbara Street, San Diego, CA.
2020 Red Fox Room Retroactive Review, JCG Development, San Diego, CA. 2020 Rancho Miramonte Section 106 Evaluation: Historic Property Survey Report, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Chino, CA.
2020 Historic Resource Technical Report: 2956 Roosevelt Street, Sterling Corporation, Carlsbad, CA.
2020 Historic Resource Research Report: Historic Designation & Mills Act Package, 4350 Nabal Drive, La Mesa, CA.
2020 4630 Date Street Historic Landmark Nomination, La Mesa, CA. 2020 Avo Theater Rehabilitation Tax Credit Consulting, JCG Development, Vista, CA.
2020 Southern California Edison Company Transmission Line Rating and Remediation Program Kern River to Los Angeles Transmission Corridor, Historic-Era Built Environment Survey Report.
2020 Historic Resource Research Report: Historic Designation & Mills Act Package, 1025 Devonshire Drive, San Diego, CA.
2020 Historic Resource Research Report: Historic Designation & Mills Act Package, “The Muse” 1020 Prospect Street, La Jolla, CA.

BOARDS + COMMITTEES
Chair / Immediate Past Chair:

American Planning Association
National Urban Design & Preservation
Division, 04/2012-12/2016
—
Founder + Volunteer Executive
Director / Ex –Officio Director: Built
Environment Education Program
(BEEP) San Diego, 2008-2015
—
Education Committee Member:

California Preservation Foundation,
04/2012-04/2014
—
Vice-Chair + Newsletter Editor: APA
National Urban Design & Preservation
Division, 01/2010-03/2012
—
Director & Education Chair: San Diego
Architectural Foundation, 11/2008-
2011
—
Appointed Public Member: City of San
Diego Historical Resources Board
Incentives Subcommittee, 08/2008-
02/2010
—
Advisor/Member – UCSD Extension
Advisory Group Urban Planning &
Development Certificate Program,
2007 forward
—
Founding President – Jack London
District Association, 2005-2006

SELECT AWARDS
2016 - Award of Excellence for
Preservation Advancement - City of San
Diego Historical Resources Board
(recognized for Urbana's preservation
planning study for the San Diego State
Normal School Campus & San Diego
City Schools Historic District).
—
2014 - American Planning Association
(APA) San Diego Chapter – Planning
Agency Award for preparation of La
Mesa 2030 General Plan. *Historic
Preservation Element prepared by
WLTB / Urbana.

Page 266 of 615 ends

Wendy L. Tinsley Becker, RPH, AICP, Principal
Architectural Historian + Urban / Preservation Planner
[email protected]
2020 Historic District Nomination Package: Culverwell and Taggarts, City of San Diego, CA.
2020 Historic District Nomination Package, Arizona Street Tract, Park Villas Subdivision, City of San Diego, CA.
2020 Historical Resource Analysis Report, Moiola School, Fountain Valley, CA. 2020 Historical Resource Survey, Proposed Merrill Commerce Center Specific Plan, Ontario, CA.
2020 Historic Property Survey Report :Evan Hewes Highway and Bridge Evaluation, Imperial County, CA.
2020 Historical Resource Analysis Report: Historic Designation and Mills Act Application 552 Rushville Street, San Diego, CA.
2019 Historic Context and Preservation Element Historical Resource Analysis Report / Historic Property Survey Report for Southern California Edison Company Lindsay Substation and Bliss-Lindsay 66kV Sub-Transmission Line. 2019 To Kalon Vineyard / Robert Mondavi Winery Patent Litigation Expert Witness Consulting, Oakville, CA.
2019 Historical Resource Analysis Report, Vic Braden Tennis College, 23333 Ave La Caza, Coto De Caza, CA.
2019 Church of God in Christ Bulletin 580 Package.
2019 Historical Resource Analysis Report, 7407 Alvarado Road, La Mesa, CA. 2019 City of Laguna Beach Preservation Ordinance and Program Consulting. 2019 Historic Resource Research Report and Conditions Consulting, 8445 Avenida de las Ondas, La Jolla, CA.
2019 Southern California Edison Company Transmission Line Rating and Remediation Program Control-Silver Peak Transmission Corridor, HistoricEra Built Environment Survey Report. 2019 Southern California Edison Catalina Island Historic-Era Water System Management Program, Catalina Island, CA.
2019 Historical Resource Analysis Report / Historic Property Survey Report, Southern California Edison Catalina Island Wrigley Pipeline Project, Catalina Island, CA.
2019 Retroactive Historical Resource Research Report, 31st Street, San Diego, CA. 2019 Historical Resource Analysis Report / Historic Property Survey Report Southern California Edison Pedley Powerhouse Complex, Norco, California. 2019 Historical Resource Analysis Report / Historic Property Survey Report Southern California Edison Company Eastern Sierras Transmission System, Mono County and Inyo County, California.
2019 Historical Resource Research Report, 3629 Front Street, San Diego, CA. 2019 Programmatic Agreement Among the Bureau of Land Management – California, the USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Region, California Utility Providers, and the California Office of Historic Preservation, Regarding the Identification, Evaluation, Management, and Exemption of Historic-Era Electrical Infrastructure Facilities in the State of California. 2019 City of San Diego Clairemont Community Plan Update, Historic Context and Preservation Element.
2019 Historic Site Report, 10446 Russell Road, La Mesa, CA. 2019 City of Coronado, As-Needed Historic Research Consulting, Coronado, CA. 2019 Historical Resource Research Report, 4250-52 Cleveland Ave, San Diego, CA. 2018 Southern California Edison Company Transmission Line Rating and Remediation Program Control-Silver Peak Transmission Corridor, HistoricEra Built Environment Survey Report – Phase 1 Desk Survey. 2018 Southern California Edison Company Transmission Line Rating and Remediation Program Control-Haiwee Transmission Corridor, Historic-Era Built Environment Survey Report – Phase 1 Desk Survey.

SELECT AWARDS (CONT.)
2013 – American Planning Association
National Division Executive Committee
Recipient – Division Achievement
Award (recognized for professional
development webinars on historic
preservation, urban design, and
development topics developed on behalf
of the APA Urban Design & Preservation
Division).
—
2012 - American Association of
Environmental Professionals San Diego
Chapter – Outstanding Planning
Document Award for preparation of the
City of Chula Vista Historic Preservation
Program & Ordinance. *Historic
Preservation Ordinance& Program
prepared by WLTB / Urbana.
—
2012 - American Planning Association
National Division Executive Committee
Recipient – Education Excellence Award
(recognized for education efforts on
behalf of the APA Urban Design &
Preservation Division).
—
2011 - American Planning Association
National Division Executive Committee
Recipient Branding Award (recognized
for visibility, outreach, and education
efforts on behalf of the APA Urban
Design & Preservation Division).
—
2010 - Award of Excellence in Education
- City of San Diego City Planning &
Community Investment Department
Historical Resources Board (recognized
for the Built Environment Education
Program developed for the San Diego
Architectural Foundation / BEEP San
Diego).
—
2009 - San Diego Public Library
Foundation / Friends of the San Diego
Public Library 2008-2009 Chapter
Volunteer Award, University Heights
Branch (recognized for preservation
planning work at the historic San Diego
State Normal College campus).

Page 267 of 615 ends

Wendy L. Tinsley Becker, RPH, AICP, Principal
Architectural Historian + Urban / Preservation Planner
[email protected]
2018 Southern California Edison Company Transmission Line Rating and Remediation Program ICKI Transmission Corridor, Historic-Era Built Environment Survey Report – Phase 1 Desk Survey.
2018 Southern California Edison Company Transmission Line Rating and Remediation Program Eldorado-Lugo-Pisgah Transmission Corridor, HistoricEra Built Environment Survey Report – Phase 1 Desk Survey. 2018 City of San Diego Park Boulevard Residential Historic District Historic Context Statement and Nomination Package.
2018 California Department of General Services, Metropolitan State Hospital Project Historical Resource Analysis Report.
2018 City of San Juan Capistrano, River Street Marketplace Historical Resource Analysis Report.
2018 Southern California Edison Company Transmission Line Rating and Remediation Program Kern River to Los Angeles Transmission Corridor, Historic-Era Built Environment Survey Report – Phase 1 Desk Survey. 2017 Historic Site Designation Package, Wexler House 1088 Sierra Vista Avenue, La Mesa, California.
2017 Nelson-Sloan Otay Rock Plant Property, Chula Vista, California 91910. 2017 Adams Avenue, Murrieta, California, Tract Map Historical, Cultural, and Paleontological Report.
2017 4 Greenwood Common (Berkeley Landmark No. 125) Mills Act Application Package, Berkeley, CA.
2017 Historical Resource Analysis Report, 1201 S. Grand Avenue, Los Angeles, California.
2017 Design Review Analysis and Historical Resource Research Report, 4884 Marlborough Avenue, San Diego, California.
2017 Historical Resource Analysis Report / Historic Property Survey Report, SCE MacNeil Substation, Burbank, California.
2017 Peer Review Statement, 400 S. Alameda Street, Los Angeles, California. 2017 4617-4619 and 4621-4625 Park Boulevard, San Diego, California, Historical Resource Technical Report.
2017 Historical Resource Research Report, 707 17th Street, San Diego, California. 2017 5064 Lotus Street, San Diego, California, Historical Resource Technical Report.
2017 Historical Resource Technical Report, 550 Sicard Street, San Diego, California.
2017 Historic Landmark Designation Package, 9415-9425 Eldorado Lane, La Mesa, California.
2017 6035 University Avenue, San Diego, California, Historical Resource Technical Report.
2016 Expert Witness Consulting, Bernati Ticino Trust v. City of San Diego 2016 4365-4369 Ohio Street, San Diego, California, Historical Resource Technical Report.
2016 4505 Park Boulevard, San Diego California, Historical Resource Technical Report.
2016 Designation and Mills Act Rehabilitation Reporting and Consulting for the Edwin K. Hurlbert House, 2930 Chatsworth Boulevard, San Diego, CA. 2016 NHPA Section 106 Historic Property Analysis and Findings of Effect Statement for the Southern California Yeshiva High School, San Diego, CA. 2016 Peak Valley Solar Farm CEQA Cultural Resources Analysis (Historical Resources, Cultural Resources, and Paleontological Resources), San Bernardino County, CA.

RELATED EXPERIENCE
Member: County of San Diego Valle de
Oro Community Planning Group,
09/2016 forward
—
Director + Civic Improvement Chair,
Grossmont-Mt. Helix Improvement
Association, 08/2016 forward
—
Mentor: San Diego State University
Aztec Mentor Program, Spring 2016
Cohort
—
Co-Author / Editor: AICP Certified Urban
Designer Exam Study Guide, Version 1.0
(released March 2016)
—
AICP Exam Course Speaker: California
Chapter, San Diego Section, (annually)
02/2013-present
—
Retreat Facilitator: Beautiful Pacific
Beach, Annual Board of Directors
Retreat, (annually) 2016-present
—
Invited Panel Speaker: Density and
Design: The Future of Housing in San
Diego, American Planning Association
San Diego Section, San Diego, 09/2017
—
Invited Speaker: Building Community
and Character – Preservation is Place; 1st
Annual Historic Preservation
Conference Nebraska State Office of
Historic Preservation, Omaha (NE),
06/2013
—
Panel Speaker: Preservation Toolkit for
Small Cities, American Planning
Association California Chapter
Conference, 10/2012
—
Invited Speaker: Preliminary Findings –
The Status of Preservation Planning
Regulatory Programs in the San Diego
Region - 2012, Association of
Environmental Professionals San
Diego Chapter September Luncheon,
09/2012

Page 268 of 615 ends

Wendy L. Tinsley Becker, RPH, AICP, Principal
Architectural Historian + Urban / Preservation Planner
[email protected]
September 2016 City of Oceanside / Caltrans, Coast Highway (Hill Street) Bridge over the San Luis Rey River Replacement Project Historical Resources Evaluation Report, Oceanside, CA.

August 2016 Historical Resource Technical Report – 715 Muirlands Vista Way, La Jolla, CA.

June 2016 Class III Cultural Resources Inventory / NRHP Eligibility Determination, SCE Eldorado 500kV Transmission System, California, Arizona, Nevada.

June 2016 Casa de las Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building, Historical Resource Analysis Report, Chula Vista, CA.

May 2016 Historic American Engineering Record (HAER) No. CA-167-O – Southern California Edison Company Big Creek Hydroelectric System Vincent 220kV Transmission Line, Kern, Fresno, and Los Angeles Counties.

May 2016 San Diego Gas & Electric Company Eastern Division Property Eligibility Review Memo, El Cajon, CA.

March 2016 Historical Resource Review - 1347-1349 Locust Street, Walnut Creek, CA.

March 2016 City of La Mesa Collier Park NHPA Section 106 Review, La Mesa, CA.

March 2016 Redwood Solar Farm 4 CEQA Cultural Resources Analysis (Historical Resources, Cultural Resources, and Paleontological Resources), Kern County, CA.

March 2016 City of La Mesa Vista La Mesa Park NHPA Section 106 Review, La Mesa, CA.

February 2016 City of Chula Vista Third Avenue Community Character + Business Improvement Guidelines.

February 2016 City of San Diego HRB No. 461 / Anderson House, San Diego County Historic Site Designation and Mills Act Rehabilitation Consulting, 3841 Sweetwater Road, Bonita, CA.

January 2016 Historic American Landscapes Survey (HALS) No. CA-122 – Collier Park, La Mesa, CA.

December 2015 Historic American Engineering Record (HAER) No. CA-2138 – Southern California Edison Company Substations: Monumental Type, Santa Barbara, Kern, Fresno, and Los Angeles Counties.

December 2015 Pacific Gas & Electric Company South of Palermo Project Historical Resource Analysis Report / Historic Property Survey Report.

November 2015 Historic American Engineering Record (HAER) No. CA-167-N – Amendment to Southern California Edison Company Big Creek Hydroelectric System East & West Transmission Line.

November 2015 Designation and Mills Act Rehabilitation Reporting and Consulting for the Alexander Schreiber Spec House No. 1 / Payne House, 1429 Dale Street, San Diego, CA.

October 2015 Designation and Mills Act Rehabilitation Reporting and Consulting for the Florence Palmer Spec. House II of III, 350 Fern Glen, San Diego, CA.

May 2015 Historic-era Electrical Infrastructure Management Program: A Program for the Identification, Review, Exemption, and Treatment of Generating Facilities, Transmission Lines, Sub-transmission Lines, Distribution Lines, and Substations within the Southern California Edison Company’s Service Territory.

March 2015 Class III Cultural Resources Inventory for Southern California Edison’s Coolwater-Lugo Transmission Project, San Bernardino County, California – Volume 1: Historic-Era Built Environment Survey Report. 2014-2015 Los Angeles Regional Intercommunications System NHPA Section 106 Assessment of 125 sites located throughout Los Angeles County. 2014 Historic Preservation and Urban Planning Expert Witness, Brandon Milan v.

City of San Diego, State of California Superior Court Case No. 37-2013- 00067039-CU-EI-CTL.
2013-2014 Historic Preservation and Urban Planning Expert Witness, Edward Valerio v.

City of San Diego, U.S.D.C. Case No. 12C1200W (WMC)
RELATED EXPERIENCE (CONT.)
Attendee: National Charrette
Institute, Introduction to Dynamic
Planning (Level 1 NCI Charrette
Manager Certification Training), San
Diego (CA) 10/2003
—
Attendee: CA Preservation Foundation,
Incentives for Historic Preservation
Projects, Berkeley (CA) 09/2003
—
Attendee: University of Southern CA,
Preservation Planning & Law, Los
Angeles (CA) 07/2003
—
Attendee: League of CA Cities, Smart
Growth Zoning Codes, Lodi (CA) 12/2002
—
Invited Participant: Second Natures,
Redefining the Los Angeles Riverfront,
Los Angeles (CA) 01/2002 (2-Day
Planning & Design Charrette hosted by
MOCA & The Geffen)
—
Selected Smart Growth Researcher: San
Diego State University Foundation &
City Planning Graduate Program, Dr.

Roger Caves, 01/2001 – 08/2001 (Grant
Topic: Planning for Sprawl in the U.S)
—
Attendee: Section 106 An Introductory
Course, National Preservation Institute,
San Francisco (CA) 04/1999

COURSES CREATED & TAUGHT
BUSA 40687 - Historic Preservation
Planning (UCSD 2006-2012)
—
BUSA 40515 - Fundamentals of City
Planning (UCSD 2007)
—
BUSA 40748 - Foundations of Urban
Planning & The Built Environment
(UCSD 2009-2012)
—
BUSA 40749 - Functions & Processes of
City Planning (UCSD 2011-2012)
—
ART 40436 - American Architectural
History I & II (UCSD 2008-2014)
—
CP 670 - History of Urban Planning
(SDSU 2012)

Page 269 of 615 ends

La Mesa City CouncilJune 14, 2022

La Mesa City Council
June 14, 2022