Agenda packet, regular meeting — La Mesa City Council, June 14, 2022 (part 3 of 6)

Wendy L. Tinsley Becker, RPH, AICP, Principal
Architectural Historian + Urban / Preservation Planner
[email protected]
November 2014 Historic-Era Built Environment Survey Report, NRHP / CRHR Eligibility Evaluations, and Concurrence Consulting for proposed Coolwater Lugo Transmission Project (approx. 200 built environment sites over 13 segments in the vicinity of Apple Valley, Barstow, and Hesperia, California).

November 2014 Herald Examiner Building, 1101-1139 S. Broadway, Los Angeles, CA, Historic Preservation Certification Application: Part 1 – Determination of Eligibility – Draft Submittal.

November 2014 Cecil Hotel Building, 640 Main Street, Los Angeles, CA, Historic Preservation Certification Application: Part 1 – Determination of Eligibility – Draft Submittal.

November 2014 Cecil Hotel Building, 640 Main Street, Los Angeles, CA, City of Los Angeles Historic Cultural Monument Application Package – Draft Submittal.

November 2014 Historic-Era Electrical Infrastructure Management Program: A Program for the Identification, Review, Exemption, and Treatment of Generating Facilities, Transmission Lines, Sub-transmission Lines, Distribution Lines, and Substations within the SCE Service Territory.

October 2014 Commercial Exchange Building, 416 W. 8th Street, Los Angeles, CA, Historic Preservation Certification Application: Part 2 – Description of Rehabilitation – Draft Submittal.

October 2014 NRHP / CRHR Eligibility Review, SCE Lighthipe and Laguna Bell Substations, Long Beach and Commerce, California.

October 2014 NRHP / CRHR Eligibility Review, SCE Eagle Rock Substation, Los Angeles, California.

October 2014 NRHP / CRHR Eligibility Review, SCE Colton Substation, Colton, California.

September 2014 City and County of Honolulu Little Makalapa National Register of Historic Places Nomination Peer Review.

September 2014 City and County of Honolulu Big Makalapa National Register of Historic Places Nomination Peer Review.

September 2014 Sudberry Properties Strawberry Fields Historic Cultural Landscape Analysis Report, Chula Vista, CA.

July 2014 Friday Morning Club Building, 938 S. Figueroa, Los Angeles, CA, Historic Preservation Certification Application: Part 2 – Description of Rehabilitation – Draft Submittal.

May 2014 Commercial Club of Southern California Building / Case Hotel Part 2 Determination of Eligibility, Los Angeles, CA.

May 2014 City and County of Fresno Tertiary Treatment and Disinfection Facility – Plant 2 NHPA Section 106 and CEQA Historical Resource Assessment.

April 2014 City and County of Honolulu Aloha Stadium Station Project Treatment Plan Peer Review, Honolulu, CA.

April 2014 Redwood Solar Farm Historic Property Survey / Historical Resource Report, Kern County, CA.

April 2014 4th@ Broadway EIR Mitigated Negative Declaration – Historical Resource Assessment Report, Los Angeles, CA
March 2014 Commercial Club of Southern California Building / Case Hotel Part 1 Determination of Eligibility, Los Angeles, CA.

February 2014 Commercial Club of Southern California Building / Case Hotel Historic Cultural Monument Application, Los Angeles, CA.

January 2014 1560 S. Escondido Boulevard NHPA Section 106 Review and Concurrence Consulting.

November 2013 Consulting for Two Historic House Relocations to the City of San Diego Development Services Department, Public Works Department, and City Attorney’s Office.

Page 270 of 615 ends

Wendy L. Tinsley Becker, RPH, AICP, Principal
Architectural Historian + Urban / Preservation Planner
[email protected]
September 2013 Caltrans Section 106 Historic Property and CEQA Historical Resource Survey – Gilbert Street, Santa Ana, CA.

October 2013 NHPA Section 106 Historic Property and CEQA Historical Resource Survey Report, Proposed Coolwater Lugo Transmission Project.

June 2013 Historic Agricultural Landscapes of Visalia and Tulare County electronic book and exhibit – Tulare County Museum of Farm Labor and Agriculture, Visalia, CA
January 2013 National Park Service Historic American Engineering Record (HAER) Level II Documentation (Large Format Negative Photography & Narrative) – Big Creek Hydroelectric System East & West Transmission Line, Fresno to Los Angeles, CA
January 2013 Historical and Architectural Eligibility Evaluation of Delano Substation Complex.

October 2012 Historical and Architectural Eligibility Evaluations of the Southern California Edison Company Historic-Era Casitas, Santa Barbara, Carpinteria, Santa Clara, and Goleta Substations
October 2012 City and County of San Francisco, 2419-2435 Lombard Street Historical Resource Evaluation Report.
2011-2013 Historic Preservation Expert Witness, Academy of Our Lady of Peace v. City of San Diego, U.S.D.C. Case No. 09CV0962 WQH (MDD)
In-process San Diego Municipal Anglers Building Historical Resource Designation Report, San Diego, CA
July 2012 National Park Service Historic American Engineering Record (HAER) Level II Documentation (Large Format Negative Photography & Narrative) – SCE San Joaquin Cross Valley Loop Project, Visalia, CA
June 2012 Historic Structure Report - Casa Peralta, 384 West Estudillo Avenue, San Leandro, CA
June 2012 County of San Diego Historic Site Designation Report, John N. Mortenson’s Hines Residence, Mt. Helix, CA
April 2012 NHPA Section 106 Review, Lodi Municipal Stadium, Lodi, CA March 2012 Federal Rehabilitation Certification Application – Part 3 Request for Certification of Completed Work – Imig Manor / Lafayette Hotel, 2223 El Cajon Boulevard, San Diego, CA
February 2012 National Register of Historic Places Nomination, Imig Manor / Lafayette Hotel, 2223 El Cajon Boulevard, San Diego, CA
February 2012 Sequoia National Forest Electric Power Conveyance Systems NRHP Eligibility Evaluations, Tulare County, CA
January 2012 NHPA Section 106 Review, La Mesa Youth Center, La Mesa, CA December 2011 City of La Mesa 2012 General Plan Update – 2030 Historic Preservation Element, La Mesa, CA
December 2011 Crown City Medical Center EIR Historical Resource Initial Study, Pasadena, CA
November 2011 NHPA Section 106 Review, 4470 Acacia Avenue, La Mesa, CA September 2011 Big Creek Hydroelectric System Historic District Vincent 220kV Transmission Line NRHP Eligibility Evaluation and Historic Property Treatment Plan.

July 2011 Historic-Era Electric Power Conveyance Systems Programmatic Agreement (SCE, BLM, & CA, NV SHPO) (Context, Typology, Identification, Integrity Qualifications, & Treatment Processes)
June 2011 Aesthetic impact Analysis Report, Hollywoodland Historic Rock Retaining Walls, Los Angeles, CA
April 2011 Kern River – Los Angeles 60 / 66kV Transmission Line NRHP Eligibility Evaluation, Kern & L.A. Counties
December 2010 Historic Structure Report - Linda Vista Federal Defense Housing Project Tenant Activity Building, San Diego, CA

Page 271 of 615 ends

Wendy L. Tinsley Becker, RPH, AICP, Principal
Architectural Historian + Urban / Preservation Planner
[email protected]
October 2010 City of San Diego Redevelopment Agency, Historic Property / Historical Resource Analysis Report of the Linda Vista Federal Defense Housing Project Tenant Activity Building, San Diego, CA
November 2010 Historic Designation Report, Burt F, Raynes Residence, 299 Hilltop Drive, Chula Vista, CA
August 2010 Southern California Edison Company Tehachapi Renewable Transmission Project Antelope-Vincent No. 1 220kV Transmission Line NRHP/CRHR Review
July 2010 Southern California Edison Company Tehachapi Renewable Transmission Project Rosamond Substation NRHP/CRHR Review, Montebello, California July 2010 Southern California Edison Company Tehachapi Renewable Transmission Project Antelope-Mesa 220kV Transmission Line NRHP/CRHR Review June 2010 Southern California Edison Company Tehachapi Renewable Transmission Project Chino-Mesa 220kV Transmission Line NRHP/CRHR Review June 2010 Southern California Edison Company Tehachapi Renewable Transmission Project Chino Substation NRHP/CRHR Review, Chino, California April 2010 Historical Resource Analysis Report, Hollywoodland Historic Rock Retaining Walls, Los Angeles, CA
March 2010 Imig Manor/ Lafayette Hotel Part 2 20% Federal Rehabilitation Tax Credit Application
January 2010 CEQA Historical Resource Analysis Report, 2629 National Avenue, San Diego CA
December 2009 City of Santa Ana Warner Avenue Transportation Study Historical Resource Survey, Santa Ana, CA
December 2009 Proposed Heidi Square Redevelopment Project – Project Management, Preservation Planning & Subdivision Re-Design Consulting, San Lorenzo, CA November 2009 City of San Diego Redevelopment Agency, Historical Resource Review of 4102-4122 University Avenue, San Diego, CA
November 2009 CEQA Historical Resource Analysis Report, 7195 Country Club Drive, La Jolla, CA
November 2009 Imig Manor/ Lafayette Hotel Part 1 20% Federal Rehabilitation Tax Credit Application
August 2009 CEQA Historical Resource Analysis Report, 5511 Calumet Avenue, La Jolla, CA
August 2009 Preservation Planning Study, Site Development, & Rehabilitation Analysis of the Herman Hotel Carriage House, Chula Vista, CA
August 2009 Historical Site Designation, Design Review, & Mills Act Property Tax Consulting for the Dennstedt Building Company’s Calavo Gardens Queen Avenue Dwelling, Mt. Helix, CA
August 2009 CEQA and NHPA Section 106 Review of the Nike Missile Defense System - LA - 14/29 Commemorative Site, unincorporated Los Angeles, CA July 2009 Code Compliance & Resource Review, 2341 Irving Avenue, San Diego, CA July 2009 City of Santa Ana Bristol & 17th Transportation Study Historical Resource Survey, Santa Ana, CA
May 2009 Fresno Unified School District Historical Resource Survey of the Proposed M4 Site, Fresno, CA May 2009 Section 106 Review of Casa Blanca – 716 Santa Clara Avenue, Alameda, CA April 2009 Design Review Analysis for the 2110 Glenneyre Street Property, Laguna Beach, CA
April 2009 Section 106 Review of the Fairfax Theatre, Oakland, CA March 2009 National Register of Historic Places Documentation & Eligibility Evaluation for the Middle Fork American River Hydroelectric Project, Placer County, California

Page 272 of 615 ends

Wendy L. Tinsley Becker, RPH, AICP, Principal
Architectural Historian + Urban / Preservation Planner
[email protected]
February 2009 Historical Resource Analysis Report & Design Review – 337 Hawthorne Road, Laguna Beach, CA
February 2009 San Diego Normal School Campus Phase I Preservation Planning Study & Historical Resource Survey, San Diego, CA
January 2009 Historical Resource Analysis Report, 634 2nd Avenue, Chula Vista, CA October 2008 Pier 29 National Historic Preservation Act Finding of Effects Statement, San Francisco, CA
2007-2008 Lead Consultant – City of Chula Vista Historic Preservation Program Development – City of Chula Vista Historic Preservation Program Binder (ordinance, historic inventory database, historical overview statement, incentives, project review process and related permit application and processing forms
August 2008 Mayor John Gill Residence, Designation, Mills Act & Rehabilitation Consulting, San Leandro, CA
July 2008 California Portland Cement Company P&H Excavators #3 & #4 Historic Context Statement & California Register Eligibility Review, Mojave, CA July 2008 Historic Context Statement – Bean Springs Site, Rosamond, CA June 2008 Cultural Resource Report & Regulatory Review, PL-SCE-Tehachapi-10H, Acton, CA
May 2008 Historical Resource Documentation & Review, San Diego Aqueduct, San Diego, CA
April 2008 Historic Site Designation & Mills Act Historic Property Tax Consulting for the Goldberg Residence, 4654 Iowa Street, San Diego, CA
April 2008 Storefront Improvement / Façade Revitalization Historical Resource Analysis & Design Review Assistance, 3201 Adams Avenue, San Diego, CA March 2008 Lombardi Ranch CEQA Review, San Ardo, California February 2008 Del-Sur Saugus Mining Complex Historical Resource Review, Grass Valley, CA
February 2008 Foothill Ranch Historical Resource Review, Palmdale, CA January 2008 Section 106 Review 1425-1475 South Main Street, Walnut Creek, CA January 2008 Historic Site Designation Report & Mills Act Property Tax Consulting - Ocean Beach Cottage Emerging Historic District Contributor, 4670 Del Monte Ave., San Diego, CA
November 2007 Historic Site Designation & Mills Act Historic Property Tax Consulting for the Olmstead Building Company’s Calavo Gardens Project #531, Mt. Helix, CA October 2007 Southern CA Edison Company’s Del Sur-Saugus Transmission Line Historical Resource Review, Lancaster - Palmdale, CA
October 2007 Southern CA Edison Company’s Antelope Substation Historical Resource Review, Lancaster, CA
September 2007 Historical Resource Review & Data Responses for the Proposed SDG&E Orange Grove Energy Project in Pala, CA
September 2007 SCE Kaiser Pass Cabin Historic Property Assessment, Fresno Co., CA August 2007 USDA Forest Service Meeks Creeks Bridge Assessment, Lake Tahoe, CA July 2007 Historical Resource Analysis Report, 433 W. Meadow Drive, Palo Alto, CA May 2007 Historic Preservation Assessment & New Project Planning and Design Consulting – 3994 Jackdaw Street, San Diego (CA)
February 2007 419 Park Way Historical Resource Analysis Report, Chula Vista, CA January 2007 Upper Triangle Areas Historic Property Survey (Historic Context Statement and Architectural/Historical Documentation of 50 Properties over 15 City Blocks), Fresno, CA
December 2006 Historic Site Designation & Mills Act Historic Property Tax Consulting for the Charles Wakefield Cadman Residence, Mt. Helix, CA.

November 2006 Historical Resource Analysis of the 4303 Narragansett Avenue Property, San Diego, CA

Page 273 of 615 ends

Wendy L. Tinsley Becker, RPH, AICP, Principal
Architectural Historian + Urban / Preservation Planner
[email protected]
September 2006 Section 106 Review of the 1333 Balboa Street Property, San Francisco, CA September 2006 Section 106 Review of the Historic Delta-Mendota Canal, Los Banos, CA August 2006 Historical Evaluation Report – 2959 East Avenue, Hayward, CA June 2006 Historical Resource Analysis Report: 418-450 10th Avenue Properties, San Diego, CA
May 2006 Section 106 Review of the Cocoanut Grove Building – Santa Cruz Beach Boardwalk, Santa Cruz, CA
May 2006 Historical Resource Evaluation Report for the 70 15th Street Warehouse, San Diego, CA
April 2006 Historic Site Designation Report & Mills Act Property Tax Consulting - Ocean Beach Cottage Emerging Historic District Contributor, 4528 Saratoga Avenue, San Diego, CA
March 2006 City of Fresno Arts-Culture District Historic Property Survey (Historic Context Statement and Architectural/Historical Documentation of 90-100 Properties over 18 City Blocks), Fresno, CA
March 2006 South Mossdale Historic-Era House Evaluation, Lathrop, CA February 2006 Westwind Barn Historic Preservation Study, Los Altos Hills, CA January 2006 Section 106 Review of the 2654 Mission Street Property, San Francisco, CA January 2006 Section 106 Review of the 325 Mowry Avenue Property, Fremont, CA 94536 January 2006 Section 106 Review of Ardenwood 34551 Ardenwood Bouevard, Fremont, CA 94555
December 2005 Section 106 Review of the 1230 N Street Property, Sacramento, CA 95814 December 2005 Section 106 Review of the Sacramento City College Water Tower, Sacramento, CA
November 2005 Section 106 Review of Fair Oaks Watts, 525 La Sierra Drive, Sacramento, CA November 2005 Napa Valley College Bus Shelter West Historical Resource Analysis Report, Napa, CA
October 2005 Section 106 Review of the 1025 3rd Street Property, Sacramento, CA 95818 September 2005 City of Davis, Historic Anderson Bank Building Research, Documentation & Design Review Analysis, 203 G Street, Davis, CA
September 2005 Historical Resource Analysis Report, 1212 & 1214 Second Street, San Rafael, CA
August 2005 Historical Resource Analysis Report – Somky Property/Thompson’s Soscol Ranch, Napa, CA 94558
July 2005 Walnut Creek Women’s Club Environmental Impact Report, 1224 Lincoln Avenue, Walnut Creek, CA
June 2005 Tam Property Lot Split Historic Preservation Consulting, Castro Valley, CA May 2005 Historical Resource Analysis Report, 7329-7331 Eads Avenue, San Diego, CA March 2005 Ehlers Estate Historical Resource Analysis, 3222 Ehlers Lane, St. Helena, CA March 2005 University of CA at Santa Cruz Preservation Consulting (Campus Wide Cultural Resources Inventory, Historic Context Statement – Campus Planning History)
February 2005 Hall Winery Historical Resource Analysis, St. Helena, CA January 2005 Historical Resource Evaluation, 700 28th Avenue, San Mateo, CA January 2005 Historical Resource Evaluation, 312 & 318 Highland Avenue, San Mateo, CA December 2004 San Mateo Motel Historical Resource Report – Park Bayshore Townhomes – Environmental Impact Report (Revised February 2005)
November 2004 Historical Evaluation of the San Mateo Motel, 801 South Bayshore Boulevard, San Mateo, CA
October 2004 Stonegate Homes Subdivision Plan, and Single-and-Multi-Family Dwellings Design Review, San Mateo, CA
September 2004 University of CA at Santa Cruz, Getty Campus Heritage Grant Application September 2004 City of Riverside Downtown Fire Station No.1 Cultural Resources Analysis, Riverside, CA

Page 274 of 615 ends

Wendy L. Tinsley Becker, RPH, AICP, Principal
Architectural Historian + Urban / Preservation Planner
[email protected]
August 2004 Residential Remodel Design Review – Glazenwood Historic District Contributor, 929 Laurel Avenue, San Mateo, CA
August 2004 Odd Fellows Hall, Historic Structure Report, 113 South B Street, San Mateo, CA (with Conservator Seth Bergstein)
July 2004 Design Review Analysis – Schneider’s Building, 208 East Third Street, San Mateo, CA 94401
July 2004 Embarcadero Cove Development Project Initial Study – Preliminary Historical Resource Analysis, Oakland, CA 94606
July 2004 Historical Resource Evaluation Report – 4830 Cape May Avenue, San Diego, CA 92107 (Revised January 2005)
June 2004 City of Monterey Alvarado Street Mixed-Use Project - APE Survey, Monterey, CA
June 2004 City and County of San Francisco Historical Resource Evaluation Report – 450 Frederick Street, San Francisco, CA 94117
June 2004 Design Review Analysis – 117 Clark Drive, San Mateo, CA 94402 May 2004 Historical Evaluation of the 426 Clark Drive Residence, San Mateo, CA 94402 April 2004 City and County of San Francisco Historical Resource Evaluation Report – 1272 42nd Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94122
April 2004 City of Fresno Broadway Row Historical Resource Survey, Fresno, CA March 2004 Historical Evaluation of the 117 Clark Drive Residence, San Mateo, CA 94402 March 2004 Historical Evaluation of The Fresno Republican/McMahan’s Building, 2030 Tulare Street, Fresno, CA 93721
February 2004 Crocker Bank Building Preservation Planning Considerations Memorandum January 2004 Historical Evaluation of the 501 Walnut Street Residence, San Carlos, CA 94070
January 2004 Historical Evaluation of the 20 Madison Avenue and 29 Hobart Avenue Properties, San Mateo, CA 94402
January 2004 Historical Evaluation of The Residence Located At 571 Valley Street, San Francisco, CA
January 2004 Historical Evaluation of the 3925 20th Street Residence, San Francisco, CA 94131
November 2003 Historical Evaluation of Commercial Building Located at 1022 El Camino Real, San Carlos, CA
November 2003 Peer Review Statement for the K & T Foods Building, 451 University Avenue, Palo Alto, CA
November 2003 Historical Evaluation of the Greer-O’Brine Property, 51 Encina Avenue, Palo Alto, CA,
November 2003 Embarcadero Hotel Environmental Impact Report, Historical Resources Analysis and Design Review Statement
October 2003 City of San Leandro Historical Resources Survey, Historic Context Statement, Historic Preservation Ordinance, and Draft Historic Preservation Benefits/Incentive Program
August 2003 Palm Theater Environmental Impact Report, Historical Resources Analysis July 2003 Historical Evaluation of The First Christian Church Building, 2701 Flores Street, San Mateo, CA 94403
June 2003 Alameda Naval Air Station Reuse Project Historic Preservation Regulatory and Policy Memorandum (Prepared for Alameda Point Community Partners-Master Developer for NAS Alameda)
May 2003 Historical Evaluation of The Residence Located At 606 Dorchester Road, San Mateo, CA
March 2003 Ames Aeronautical Laboratory 40’ x 80’ Wind Tunnel National Register Nomination (Prepared for NASA Ames Research Center)
March 2003 Ames Aeronautical Laboratory 6’ x 6’ Supersonic Wind Tunnel National Register Nomination (Prepared for NASA Ames Research Center)

Page 275 of 615 ends

Wendy L. Tinsley Becker, RPH, AICP, Principal
Architectural Historian + Urban / Preservation Planner
[email protected]
March 2003 Ames Aeronautical Laboratory Administration Building National Register Nomination (Prepared for NASA Ames Research Center)
March 2003 Historical Evaluation of The Residence Located At 1015 South Grant Street, San Mateo, CA
February 2003 8th & Market, 10 United Nations Plaza, Cell Site Impact Review, San Francisco, CA
February 2003 Existing Conditions and Subdivision Design Alternatives for The Proposed Hayman Homes Tract No. 7267, Proctor Road, Castro Valley, CA February 2003 Historical Evaluation of The Residence Located At 336 West Poplar Avenue, San Mateo, CA
January 2003 Historical Evaluation of The Residence Located At 744 Occidental Avenue, San Mateo, CA
January 2003 Historical Evaluation of the 131 and 141 West Third Avenue Apartment Buildings, San Mateo, CA
December 2002 CA State Capitol Building, Historical Resource Review, Sacramento, CA November 2002 Wireless Antenna Site Review, Medical Arts Building, 2000 Van Ness Avenue, San Francisco, CA
October 2002 Historical Evaluation of The LeDucq Winery Estate, 3222 Ehlers Lane, St.

Helena, CA 94574 (Revised June 2003)
October 2002 Historical Assessment of The St. Patrick’s Parish Community Building Located At 3585 30th Street, San Diego, CA, 92104
September 2002 Historical Assessment of The Building Located At 4257 Third Street, San Diego, CA,
April 2002 Historical Assessment of The Building Located At 3567 Ray Street, San Diego, CA,
October 2001 Historical Assessment of The Gustafson’s Furniture Building Located At 2930 El Cajon Boulevard, San Diego, CA, 92104
September 2001 Historical Review of Lots A, B, K & L, Block 93, Horton’s Addition Lockling, San Diego, CA
August 2011 El Cortez Hotel Part 3 - Request for Certification of Completed Work August 2001 Core Inventory of All Sites Appearing to Be More Than 45 Years of Age Not Previously Documented (Prepared For Centre City Development Corporation)
August 2001 Urbana Project Abstract Bibliography (Prepared for Dr. Roger Caves, San Diego State University and San Diego State University Foundation) July 2001 Historical Assessment of The Kirkland Apartments Building Located At 2309 Fifth Avenue, San Diego, CA, 92103
July 2001 Historical Assessment of The Building Located At 4230 Maryland Street, San Diego, CA, 92103 (With Kathleen A. Crawford)
June 2001 Historical Assessment of the 2525-2529, 2537-2547, 2561 First Avenue Residences, San Diego, CA 92103
May 2001 Update of The November 1988 Historic Site Inventory of Centre City East for Centre City Development Corporation (with Scott Moomjian) April 2001 East Village Inventory of All Sites Appearing to Be More Than 45 Years of Age Not Previously Documented (Prepared for Centre City Development Corporation)
April 2001 Update of The May 1989 Historic Site Inventory of Bayside for Centre City Development Corporation
January 2001 Historic Survey Report of The Former Teledyne-Ryan Aeronautical Complex 2701 North Harbor Drive San Diego, CA 92101(with Scott Moomjian) January 2001 Historical Assessment of The Fletcher-Salmons Building 602-624 Broadway, San Diego, CA 92101
December 2000 Cultural Resource Report for The Winona Avenue Area Elementary School Preferred Site, Alternative 1 Site, and Alternative 2 Site

Page 276 of 615 ends

Wendy L. Tinsley Becker, RPH, AICP, Principal
Architectural Historian + Urban / Preservation Planner
[email protected]
November 2000 Cultural Resource Report for The Edison/Hamilton/Parks Area Elementary School Preferred Site and Alternative Sites
November 2000 Cultural Resource Report for The Adams/Franklin Area Elementary School Preferred Site and Alternative Site
October 2000 The National Register of Historic Places Travel Itinerary; Old Town San Diego August 2000 Cultural Resource Report for The Winona Avenue Area Elementary School Preferred Site and Alternative Sites
July 2000 Cultural Resource Report, 52nd Street Area Elementary School Preferred & Alternative Sites, San Diego, CA
July 2000 Historical Assessment of the 3658 Warner Street Residence, San Diego, CA 92106
July 2000 Historical Assessment of the 367 Catalina Boulevard Residence, San Diego, CA 92106
July 2000 Historical Assessment of the 906 West Lewis Street Residence, San Diego, CA 92103
May 2000 Historical Assessment of the 501-503, 507 and 509 14th Street Residences, San Diego, CA
May 2000 The San Diego Flume Company System Redwood Pipeline, San Diego County, CA
March 2000 Historical Assessment of The Society for Crippled Children’s Hydrotherapy Gymnasium Located at 851 South 35th Street, San Diego, CA 92113 *Visit www.urbanapreservation.com for project profiles and additional information.

Page 277 of 615 ends

Page 278 of 615 ends

UP DATABASE: SHEET NUMBER: SCALE: SHEET TITLE CHECKED BY: PROJECT NO: - L. DALE DATE: DRAWN BY:

Copyright 2020, MPA Architects, Inc.. All rights reserved. c AS NOTED DESCRIPTION REVISIONS NO. DATE PROJECT CLIENT 01-03-22 20268 A PROPOSED EXTERIOR & INTERIOR TENANT IMPROVEMENT AT:
8301 LA MESA BLVD.

LA MESA, CA 91942 20268 CD's TONY GAIPA 8301 LA MESA BLVD. LA MESA, CA 91942 P: 619-922-2740 e-mail: [email protected]

LICENSED
A

RCHITECT
STATE
O
O
F
C
A
LIF
R NIA C-38204 RENEWAL 03-31-2021
LE
NO
AR
D
O
E
D
L A 3578 30th Street V. 619.236.0595 San Diego, CA 92104 www.mpa-architects.com F. 619.236.0557 SITE PLANAS1.0 PROPOSED SITE PLAN 1"=10'-0" B
S

NORTH W
E SITE PLAN KEY NOTES 1. MASONRY TRASH ENCLOSURE w/ DECORATIVE BLOCK, SOLID TRELLIS FEATURE. TRASH ENCLOSURE TO COMPLY w/ ALL NEW STATE OF CALIFORNIA & CITY REQUIREMENTS. 2. (E) CONCRETE CURB, NO CHANGE PROPOSED. 3. PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL (DASHED LINE). 5% MAX. SLOPE IN DIRECTION OF TRAVEL & 2% MAX. CROSS-SLOPE. 4. CONCRETE SIDEWALK. G.C. TO ENSURE 5% MAX. SLOPE & 2% MAX. CROSS-SLOPE. SURFACE WATER MUST DRAIN AWAY FROM BUILDING. THE GRADE SHALL FALL A MINIMUM OF 5% WITHIN THE FIRST 10 FEET (2% FOR IMPERVIOUS SURFACES). 5. PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP, RAMP TO COMPLY WITH STATE AND FEDERAL STANDARDS. 6. PROPOSED ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER LOCATION, TO BE COORDINATED w/ UTILITY COMPANY. INSTALLATION OF CONCRETE PAD FOR TRANSFORMER AND ANCHORAGE OF TRANSFORMER TO PAD UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT. 7. PRE-FABRICATED STAIRS (PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS). REFER TO FLOOR PLAN & EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS. 8. (E) CURB RAMP, NO CHANGE PROPOSED. 9. (E) CONCRETE SIDEWALK, NO CHANGE PROPOSED. 10. PROPOSED SWITCHGEAR LOCATION. REFER TO ELECTRICAL PLAN. 11. 6" CONCRETE CURB. 12. (E) 36" HIGH STATIONARY DECORATIVE BOLLARD, TO REMAIN. 13. (E) PRECAST CONCRETE LIGHT POLE, TO REMAIN. 14. (E) METAL TREE GRATE & TREE, TO REMAIN U.N.O. 15. (E) METAL BENCH, TO REMAIN. 16. (E) FIRE HYDRANT, TO REMAIN. 17. (E) PARKING METER, TO REMAIN. 18. (E) EQUIP., TO REMAIN. 19. (E) BACKFLOW PREVENTER IN PROTECTIVE CAGE. 20. (E) TRASH ENCLOSURE AREA TO BE REMOVED. 21. (E) STAIR STRUCTURE TO BE REMOVED. 22. (E) EXTERIOR DOOR TO BE REMOVED. REFER TO DEMO PLAN & (N) FLOOR PLAN. 23. (E) EXTERIOR CONC. FILLED BOLLARDS TO BE REMOVED. 24. (E) WHEEL STOP TO BE REMOVED. 25. (E) CONC. STEPS TO BE REMOVED. 26. PROPOSED (N) EXT. DOOR. REFER TO FLOOR PLAN. 27. 4 YARD DUMPSTER TO BE USED FOR CONVENTIONAL TRASH ONLY. 28. 96 GAL. TO BE USED FOR ORGANIC RECYCLING ONLY. 29. 96 GAL. TO BE USED FOR TRASH RECYCLING ONLY. # 28
1'-0"
12'-0" 5'-0" 2'-0" 8'-6" 8'-10 1/2" 7'-1 1/2"
21'-1"
2 TYP.
2 TYP.
3 4567
8 9
8 1011
4'-11" 8'-0"
CLR.
2'-0"
CLR. 1'-6" CLR. 6'-6" 1'-6" CLR. A PROPOSED EXTERIOR & INTERIOR TENANT IMPROVEMENT AT: 8301 LA MESA BLVD. LA MESA, CA 91942 VICINITY MAP SITE ANALYSIS SHEET INDEX ARCHITECTURAL SECTION AS1.0 SITE PLAN A1.1 1st FLOOR PLAN A1.2 2nd FLOOR PLAN A2.0 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A3.0 CROSS-SECTIONS NOT TO SCALE LEGAL DESCRIPTION & APN LOT:1,2 BLK:3 CITY:LA MESA SUBD:PARKS ADDITION TO LA MESA SPRINGS TR#:993 TR 993 BLK 3*LOTS 1 & 2* MAP REF:000993 APN: 494-421-01-00 APN: SITE AREA: PROPOSED BUILDING AREA (CONDITIONED AREA): 1ST FLOOR AREA: (E) FLOOR AREA: AREA REMOVED: 2ND FLOOR AREA: (E) FLOOR AREA: PROPOSED ADDITION: PROPOSED NUMBER OF STORIES: PROPOSED TOTAL HEIGHT: COVERAGE: ZONING: LAND USE: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION TYPE: PROPOSED BUILDING USE: PROPOSED OCCUPANCY GROUP: AREA SEPARATION WALLS: FIRE SPRINKLERS: BUILDING SETBACKS: FRONT: 0' INTERIOR SIDE: 0' REAR: 0' 494-421-01-00 ±5,000 S.F. 7,372 S.F. 4,093 S.F. 4,180 S.F. 87 S.F. 3,279 S.F. 3,095 S.F. 184 S.F. 02± 26'-6" ±82 % COMMERCIAL GENERAL COMMERCIAL V-B COMMERCIAL B, M NOTBD AREA OF 2nd FLOOR CONDITIONED SPACE ADDITION 184 SQ.FT. (HATCHED AREA) PROPOSED COMMERCIAL BUILDING 1st FLOOR AREA = 4,093 S.F. 2nd FLOOR AREA = 3,279 S.F. TOTAL BUILDING AREA = 7,372 S.F.

TRANSFORMER CLEARANCE 12 TYP. 13 TYP. 13 TYP. 14 15 TYP. 14 TYP. 15 TYP. 14 TYP. 16 17 17 18 19 18 (E) SITE & DEMO PLAN 1"=10'-0" A
S

NORTH W
E NOTES: 1. ALL KNOWN PROPERTY LINES, EASEMENTS AND BUILDINGS, EXISTING AND PROPOSED, ARE SHOWN ON THIS SITE PLAN. 8'-10 1/2" 7'-1 1/2" 2 TYP.
2 TYP. 21
8 9
8 PROPOSED COMMERCIAL BUILDING 1st FLOOR AREA = 4,093 S.F. 2nd FLOOR AREA = 3,279 S.F. TOTAL BUILDING AREA = 7,372 S.F. 12 TYP. 13 TYP. 13 TYP. 14 15 TYP. 14 TYP. 15 TYP. 14 TYP. 16 17 17 18 19 18 22 20 2223 TYP. 22 2425 DESCRIPTION PLAN SUBMITTAL LOG PLAN DATE 08-18-21 SUBMITTAL TO PLANNING DEPT. - 1st REVIEW 11-16-21 RESUBMITTAL TO PLANNING DEPT. - 2nd REVIEW 22 26 2626 26 SCOPE OF WORK PROJECT DESCRIPTION: THE NOYES BLOCK BUILDING IS INTENDED FOR RENOVATIONS AND UPGRADES TO PROVIDE FOR NEW COMMERCIAL OCCUPANCY AT THE GROUND FLOOR AND NEW OFFICE USES AT THE SECOND FLOOR. THE PROPOSED RENOVATIONS AND UPGRADES ARE GENERALLY REGARDED AS REHABILITATION AND INCLUDE BUT NOT LIMITED THE FOLLOWING TASKS: 1. SITE WORK: a. REMOVE EXISTING TRASH ENCLOSURE AREA AND CONSTRUCT NEW TRASH ENCLOSURE, b. REMOVE THE EXISTING EXTERIOR STAIRS AT THE EAST END OF THE SOUTH ELEVATION AND CONSTRUCT A NEW EXTERIOR STAIRCASE PARALLEL WEST SIDE OF THE SOUTH ELEVATION, c. REMOVE EXISTING PARALLEL PARKING ON THE REAR OF THE BUILDING, ADJACENT TO ALLEY, d. CONSTRUCT NEW ALCOVE FOR INSTALLATION OF NEW EXTERIOR SWITCHGEAR, 2. BUILDING EXTERIOR WORK: a. ADDITION OF 184 S.F. OF CONDITIONED BUILDING AREA, b. REPLACE THE EXISTING PAIR OF NON-ORIGINAL ALUMINUM-FRAME DOUBLE DOORS AT THE NORTH ELEVATION WITH NEW ALUMINUM-FRAME AND GLASS DOORS PARTITIONED FOR SEPARATE STOREFRONT ENTRANCES, c. REPLACE NON-ORIGINAL ALUMINUM FRAME STOREFRONT WINDOWS ON THE NORTH AND WEST ELEVATIONS WITH OPERABLE WOOD FRAME UNITS, d. REVEAL ORIGINAL TRANSOM WINDOW OPENINGS ALONG THE FIRST FLOOR OF THE NORTH AND WEST ELEVATIONS, e. INSTALL NEW PERIOD-APPROPRIATE WOOD-CLAD ALUMINUM CASEMENT WINDOWS ON THE NORTH AND WEST ELEVATIONS OF THE SECOND FLOOR, f. MOVE THE EXISTING WEST ELEVATION ENTRANCE NORTH OF ITS CURRENT LOCATION AND INSTALL NEW PERIOD- APPROPRIATE WINDOWS WHERE UNITS HISTORICALLY EXISTED, g. INSTALL GANGED CASEMENT UNITS AT THE SECOND-FLOOR SOUTH ELEVATION. 3. BUILDING INTERIOR WORK: a. INTERIOR TENANT IMPROVEMENT TO RESTORE THE LARGE INTERIOR SPACE BACK TO TWO SMALLER INTERIOR SPACES, b. REMOVE EXISTING 2ND STORY ACCESS STAIR AND CONSTRUCT NEW INTERIOR STAIRS, NOTE: A REQUEST FOR PARKING MODIFICATION IS BEING REQUESTED AS PART OF THIS SCOPE. PLEASE REFER TO PARKING ANALYSIS BELOW. PARKING ANALYSIS STANDARD PARKING REQUIREMENT (1/300 SF GLA X 7,372 SF): 22 SPACES EXISTING PARKING PROVIDED: 01 SPACE PARKING REQUIRED FOR ADDITION (1/300 SF GLA X 184 SF): 01 SPACE TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED: 02 SPACES PARKING PROPOSED: 00 SPACES 1 2729 01-03-22 RESUBMITTAL TO PLANNING DEPT. - 3rd REVIEW 100' 50'
100'
50'
100'
100'
50'
50'

ATTACHMENT
C

Page 279 of 615 ends

1 2 3 4 5
A
D
B
C
A
D
B
C
1 2 3 4 5 UP UP
UP
A
D
B
C
1 2 3 4 5
A
D
B
C
1 2 3 4 5 DN
1 2 3 DATABASE: SHEET NUMBER: SCALE: SHEET TITLE CHECKED BY: PROJECT NO: - L. DALE DATE: DRAWN BY:

LA MESA, CA 91942 20268 CD's TONY GAIPA 8301 LA MESA BLVD. LA MESA, CA 91942 P: 619-922-2740 e-mail: [email protected]

LICENSED
A

RCHITECT
STATE
O
O
F
C
A
LIF
R NIA C-38204 RENEWAL 03-31-2021
LE
NO
AR
D
O
E
D
L A 3578 30th Street V. 619.236.0595 San Diego, CA 92104 www.mpa-architects.com F. 619.236.0557 DEMO PLAN AD1.0 DEMO PLAN WALL LEGEND # DEMO PLAN KEYNOTES 1st FLOOR DEMO PLAN 1/8"=1'-0"
A
S

NORTH W
E 2nd FLOOR DEMO PLAN 1/8"=1'-0"
B
S

NORTH W
E GENERAL DEMO NOTES 1. REMOVAL OF ALL IMPROVEMENTS BY PREVIOUS TENANTS TO A CLEAN VANILLA SHELL AND BROOM CLEAN CONDITION, FREE OF ALL FLOORING MATERIAL, PAINT, WALLPAPER, MECHANICAL DUCTWORK, SPRINKLERS, INTERIOR PARTITIONS, DOORS, FLOOR SINKS AND DRAINS, AND STOREFRONT SIGNAGE, AWNINGS, AND FINISHES NOT PART OF THE BASE BUILDING DESIGN, U.N.O. 2. THIS PLAN DOES NOT INDICATE ALL ITEMS (I.E. DUCTWORK, FLOOR IRREGULARITIES) THAT MAY REQUIRE DEMOLITION. PERFORM ALL DEMOLITION WORK AS REQUIRED FOR COMPLETION OF THIS PROJECT. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXISTING/FIELD CONDITIONS AND INSPECT SITE CONDITIONS PRIOR TO SUBMIT A BID. NO ADDITIONAL COSTS WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR CONDITIONS THAT HAVE NOT BEEN FIELD VERIFIED PRIOR TO BIDDING. 4. REMOVE EXISTING IRREGULARITIES IN FLOOR (I.E. ANCHOR BOLTS AND CONCRETE POURS). ANY AND ALL UNDER-SLAB LINES (PLUMBING OR ELECTRICAL) BEING ABANDONED ARE TO BE CLEANED AND CAPPED BENEATH THE SURFACE OF THE SLAB AND THE CONCRETE SLAB SHALL BE PATCHED. LEVEL FLOOR AS REQUIRED. 5. NO BURNING OR SELLING OF ANY MATERIALS CREATED AS A RESULT OF DEMOLITION WILL BE PERMITTED. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN CLEANLINESS THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT AND THE FRONT OF THE SPACE FOR PEDESTRIAN SAFETY. 7. DEMOLITION SHALL INCORPORATE THOSE SUBORDINATE ITEMS NOT SHOWN SPECIFICALLY ON THIS PLAN, BUT REQUIRED TO BE REMOVED IN ORDER TO COMPLETE THE PROJECT. 8. MINIMIZE DUST TRANSMISSION VIA DUST BARRIERS OF POLYETHYLENE SHEETING. 9. THE PROCEDURES TO BE USED FOR THE WORK SHALL PROVIDE FOR SAFE CONDUCT OF THE WORK, CAREFUL REMOVAL, AND DISPOSITION OF MATERIALS, PROTECTION OF PROPERTY WHICH IS TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED AND COORDINATE WITH OTHER WORK IN PROGRESS. 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSURE THERE IS NO INTERFERENCE WITH ROADS, STREETS, DRIVEWAYS, LOADING DOCKS, AND ADJACENT FACILITIES. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT BEFORE OBSTRUCTING THE ABOVE. 11. DURING REMOVAL OPERATIONS, ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY SHALL BE PROTECTED. THE WORK SHALL PROCEED IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO MINIMIZE ANY SPREAD OF DUST, DEBRIS, AND FLYING PARTICLES AND SO THAT ANY RELATED EFFECTS OF DEMOLITION OR REMOVAL DO NOT INTERFERE WITH SURROUNDING EQUIPMENT, PERSONNEL, OR BUILDING(S) 12. VERIFY ALL UTILITY, SEWER, OR OTHER SERVICES BEFORE CORE DRILLING, SAW-CUTTING, AND/OR TRENCHING. PROVIDE BACK-FILL COMPACTION INFORMATION TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT AS REQUIRED. 13. CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE ALL DEBRIS FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSE OF OFF PREMISES PER LOCAL REQUIREMENTS. 14. ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIAL (ACM) - CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REMOVAL OF ANY ACM FOUND ON THIS PROJECT. ADVISE OWNER/ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY IF ACM IS FOUND ON THIS SITE. 15. PREPARE FLOOR SURFACE FOR STONE, VINYL, AND TILE. PROVIDE LEVELING CONCRETE AND GRINDING/SMOOTHING OF ANY EXISTING IRREGULARITIES. TO REMAIN, NO CHANGE U.N.O. TO BE DEMOLISHED PER PLAN (E) EXTERIOR / INTERIOR WALLS: (E) EXTERIOR / INTERIOR WALLS: 1 1. (E) WINDOW TO BE REMOVED & REPLACED. REFER TO EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS. 2. (E) ELECTRICAL PANELS TO BE RELOCATED. REFER TO ELECTRICAL PLANS. 3. (E) EXTERIOR DOOR TO REMAIN, NO CHANGE PROPOSED U.N.O. 4. (E) EXTERIOR DOOR TO BE REMOVED. 5. (E) EXTERIOR CONCRETE STEPS TO BE REMOVED. 6. (E) STRUCTURAL COLUMNS, NO CHANGE PROPOSED. 7. (E) EXTERIOR STAIRS AND ADJACENT STRUCTURAL ENCLOSURE TO BE REMOVE TO ITS ENTIRETY. 8. (E) INTERIOR PARTITION TO BE REMOVED TO ITS ENTIRETY. 9. (E) INTERIOR STAIRS TO BE REMOVED TO ITS ENTIRETY. 10. (E) PLUMBING FIXTURE TO BE REMOVED. CAP OFF ALL (E) UTILITY LINES. 11. (E) HATER HEATER ABOVE TO BE REMOVED. TEMPORARILY CAP OFF ALL (E) UTILITY LINES FOR FUTURE RESTROOM CONNECTIONS. 12. (E) CEILING SYSTEM (T-BAR AND/OR GYP. BOARD - NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY PURPOSE) TO BE REMOVED TO ITS ENTIRETY, INCLUDING ALL LIGHTING FIXTURES, SPEAKERS, MECHANICAL DIFFUSERS, REGISTERS, ETC.). G.C. TO VERIFY w/ OWNER PRIOR TO DISCARDING ANY FIXTURES. 13. (E) FENCE TO BE REMOVED. 14. (E) EXTERIOR STRUCTURE TO BE REMOVE TO ITS ENTIRETY. 15. (E) EXTERIOR RAMP TO BE REMOVED TO ITS ENTIRETY. 16. (E) INTERIOR PARTITION TO REMAIN. FIX AND/OR REPAIR FINISH MATERIAL AS REQ'D. 17. (E) RESTROOM(S) TO REMAIN, NO CHANGE PROPOSED, U.N.O. 18. (E) PLUMBING FIXTURES TO REMAIN, NO CHANGE PROPOSED, U.N.O. 19. PERIMETER OF (E) SLAB ON GRADE FOUNDATION TO (E) RAISED FLOOR FOUNDATION SYSTEM. 20. (E) SLAB ON GRADE FOUNDATION TO REMAIN. 21. (E) RAISED FLOOR FOUNDATION (DOTTED PATTERN) TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACE w/ (N) SLAB ON GRADE FOUNDATION SYSTEM. REFER TO STRUCTURAL PLANS. 22. (E) WINDOW TO BE REMOVED. FILL-IN (E) OPENING w/ 2x STUDS AND INTERIOR/EXTERIOR FINISH TO MATCH (E) ADJACENT SURFACES. 23. PROVIDE OPENING ON EXTERIOR WALL FOR (N) DOOR ALCOVE. REFER TO EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND DOOR SCHEDULE FOR (N) DOOR SIZE AND COORDINATE ROUGH OPENING ACCORDINGLY. 24. PROVIDE OPENING ON EXTERIOR WALL FOR (N) UPPER & LOWER WINDOWS. REFER TO EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND WINDOW SCHEDULE. 25. PROVIDE OPENING ON EXTERIOR WALL FOR (N) UPPER WINDOW. REFER TO EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND WINDOW SCHEDULE. 111
2 2
44 4
4 4
5 6 6
6 7
8 8
9 10 11 12 TYP. 12 TYP. 13
7 9 14 16TYP. 16 TYP. 16 TYP. 16 TYP.
6 6 TYP. 17 15 21 TYP. 19 2021 19 21 20
6 22 5'-8" 23 24 24 24 24 24 25252525 25
5'-5 1/2" 5 1/2"
1 TYP.
1 TYP. 1 TYP.
3 4 Page 280 of 615
1 2 3 4 5 ADBC ADBC 1 2 3 4 5
UP
UP DATABASE: SHEET NUMBER: SCALE: SHEET TITLE CHECKED BY: PROJECT NO: - L. DALE DATE: DRAWN BY:

LA MESA, CA 91942 20268 CD's TONY GAIPA 8301 LA MESA BLVD. LA MESA, CA 91942 P: 619-922-2740 e-mail: [email protected] LICENSED ARCHITECTSTATE O O F CA LIF R NIA C-38204 RENEWAL 03-31-2021 LE NO ARDO E D L A 3578 30th Street V. 619.236.0595 San Diego, CA 92104 www.mpa-architects.com F. 619.236.0557 1st FLOOR PLANA1.1 FLOOR PLAN WALL LEGEND EXTERIOR WALL - NON-RATED: 2x6 WOOD STUDS @ 16" O/C, w/ R-19 BATT INSULATION INTERIOR DEMISING WALL - NON-RATED: 2x6 WOOD STUDS @ 16" O/C, w/ R-19 BATT INSULATION (WHERE NOTED) INTERIOR WALL - NON-RATED: 2x4 WOOD STUDS @ 16" O/C FLOOR PLAN KEYNOTES 1. - 2. INTERIOR STAIRS & HANDRAILS. REFER TO STRUCTURAL PLANS. STAIR TREADS SHALL BE OF UNIFORM SIZE AND SHAPE, EXCEPT THE LARGEST TREAD RUN WITHIN ANY FLIGHT OF STAIRS SHALL NOT EXCEED THE SMALLEST BY MORE THAN 3/8 INCH. 3. PERIMETER OF 2ND FLOOR ABOVE (DASHED LINE). 4. APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF RECESSED KNOX BOX (3200 SERIES). VERIFY REQUIREMENTS w/ FIRE DEPT. 5. ELECTRICAL SUB-PANEL LOCATION, COORDINATE FINAL LOCATION w/ OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. REFER TO POWER PLAN & SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM. 6. SWITCHGEAR LOCATION. REFER TO POWER PLAN & SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM. 7. RESTROOM FIXTURES & ACCESSORIES. 8. STRUCTURAL POSTS. REFER TO EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS & STRUCTURAL PLANS. 9. STOREFRONT SYSTEM TO MATCH EXISTING. 10. PRE-FABRICATED METAL STAIRS. G.C. TO PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS FOR ARCHITECT'S APPROVAL PRIOR TO FABRICATION AND/OR INSTALLATION. 11. PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHER. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SUFFICIENT CLASS 2-A10BC FIRE EXTINGUISHERS (1 PER 3,000 SQ. FT. MIN.) OF BUILDING AREA AND SO THAT AN EXTINGUISHER CAN BE REACHED WITHIN 75 FEET OF ANY PORTION OF THE SPACE. FINAL NUMBER AND LOCATION TO BE VERIFIED W/ FIRE MARSHAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 12. PROVIDE THE INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITY NEAR THE STRIKE SIDE OF DOOR. 13. PROVIDE TACTILE "EXIT" SIGN NEAR STRIKE SIDE OF DOOR. 14. (N) UPPER AND/OR LOWER WINDOWS. REFER TO EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND WINDOW SCHEDULE. 15. - 16. (N) DOOR. REFER TO EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND DOOR SCHEDULE. 17. FILL-IN (E) OPENING w/ 2x STUDS AND INTERIOR/EXTERIOR FINISH TO MATCH (E) ADJACENT SURFACES. 18. SLAB IN LOBBY AREA SHALL BE DEPRESSED ±12" TO ALLOW FOR (N) EXTERIOR DOOR TO BE SET AT SAME ELEVATION AS EXTERIOR FINISH FLOOR HEIGHT. REFER TO STRUCTURAL PLANS. 19. REFER TO DOOR CLEARANCE DETAIL FOR CLEAR & LEVEL LANDING AREA REQUIRED. # 2 1st FLOOR PLAN 1/4"=1'-0" A S NORTH W E 101 FUTURE COMMERCIAL 1,388 SQ. FT. (POTENTIAL OCCUP GROUP "B", "M", A2) 103 15'-0" 9'-0"
4'-6" CIL4'-6"
5'-2"
(V.I.F.)
50'-0" 84'-2" 68'-0" 16'-2" FE11 3 3 4 55 6 8 8 8 8 8 10 11 FE 12 13 12 100 ENTRY LOBBY XXX SQ. FT. (ACCESSORY TO OCCUP GROUP "B") FUTURE COMMERCIAL 2,705 SQ. FT. (POTENTIAL OCCUP GROUP "B", "M", A2) 8'-10 1/2" 12'-8"
(VERIFY w/ EQUIP. MANUF.) 4'-6" 4'-0" 4'-0"
4'-0" 14 14 AA3.0 16 1616 17 TO REMAIN, NO CHANGE U.N.O. (E) EXTERIOR / INTERIOR WALLS: 18 14 5'-8" 14'-2 1/2" 5'-0" 2'-1" (24" MIN.)
4'-0" 4'-0" 14 TYP. 14 TYP. TYP. UPPER 14 TYP. TYP. 1616 55'-0" 6'-0"
12"
MIN.
12"
MIN.
60" MIN. 48" MIN. PUSH SIDE 18" 24" PULL SIDE INTERIOR DOOR EXTERIOR DOOR 12" ACCESSIBE DOOR CLEARANCES 1/4"=1'-0" B CLEAR & LEVEL LANDING REQ'D PROVIDE THIS ADDITIONAL SPACE IF THE DOOR HAS BOTH A LATCH AND A CLOSER 19 Page 281 of 615 ADBC 1 2 3 4 5 ADBC 1 2 3 4 5
DN DN 2 3 DATABASE: SHEET NUMBER: SCALE: SHEET TITLE CHECKED BY: PROJECT NO: - L. DALE DATE: DRAWN BY:

LA MESA, CA 91942 20268 CD's TONY GAIPA 8301 LA MESA BLVD. LA MESA, CA 91942 P: 619-922-2740 e-mail: [email protected] LICENSED ARCHITECTSTATE O O F CA LIF R NIA C-38204 RENEWAL 03-31-2021 LE NO ARDO E D L A 3578 30th Street V. 619.236.0595 San Diego, CA 92104 www.mpa-architects.com F. 619.236.0557 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A2.0 AA3.0 NORTHWEST ELEVATION 1/4"=1'-0" A SOUTHEAST ELEVATION 1/8"=1'-0" B SOUTWEST ELEVATION 1/8"=1'-0" C @ LA MESA BLVD. @ ALLEY @ PALM AVE. 68'-0" (EXISTING BUILDING) 16'-2" (NEW ADDITION) EXTERIOR MATERIALS KEYNOTES 1. (E) WINDOW TO BE REPLACED w/ (N) WOOD CLAD ALUMINUM WINDOWS. 2. (E) TILE VENEER TO BE REMOVED & REPLACED w/ PERIOD APPROPRIATE TILE VENEER. 3. (E) STUCCO FINISH, TO BE REFINISHED w/ SMOOTH SAND FINISH. 4. (E) AWNING SYSTEM, NO CHANGE PROPOSED U.N.O. 5. (N) ALUMINUM STOREFRONT/WINDOW SYSTEM w/ CLEAR GLAZING. 6. (N) EXTERIOR STUCCO w/ SMOOTH SAND FINISH. 7. (N) PRE-FABRICATED STAIRS (PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS). 8. (N) HOLLOW METAL DOOR. 9. (E) ENTRY CANVAS CANOPY TO BE RELOCATED. REPLACE CANVAS AS REQ'D. 10. (N) KNOX BOXES WILL BE PROVIDED ADJACENT TO EACH TENANT MAIN ENTRANCE DOOR MOUNTED AT 6 FEET HIGH. (CFC 506.1). COORDINATE REQUIREMENTS & INSTALLATION LOCATION W/ FIRE MARSHALL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 11. (N) TRIM w/ GA. SHEET METAL COPING w/ DRIP EDGE. DESIGN & STYLE TO MATCH EXISTING. 12. (E) WINDOW TO BE REPLACED w/ (N) VERTICAL LIFT WOOD FRAME w/ TEMPERED CLEAR GLASS WINDOWS. PAINT FRAME PER COLOR AS SHOWN. 13. (N) WOOD CLAD ALUMINUM WINDOWS w/ CLEAR GLAZING. PAINT FRAME PER COLOR AS SHOWN. 14. (N) WOOD CLAD ALUMINUM WINDOWS w/ OPACI-COAT 3-0586 MEDIUM GRAY SPANDREL GLAZING. PAINT FRAME PER COLOR AS SHOWN. 15. (N) TRASH ENCLOSURE w/ METAL RIBBED ROOF. REFER TO SITE PLAN. 16. PROPOSED ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER LOCATION. REFER TO SITE PLAN. 17. MODIFY (E) POP-OUT REVEAL SO THE UPPER WINDOW CAN PROPERLY ALIGN w/ LOWER WINDOW. 18. (N) VERTICAL LIFT WOOD FRAME w/ TEMPERED CLEAR GLASS WINDOWS. PAINT FRAME PER COLOR SHOWN. 19. PROPOSED (N) WALL MOUNTED SIGN TO MATCH ORIGINAL HISTORICAL BUILDING SIGN AS MATCH AS POSSIBLE IN SIZE, LOCATION, FONT & DESIGN. PROPOSED SIGN TO BE SUBMITTED TO PLANNING & HISTORICAL DEPT FOR REVIEW & APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 20. (E) DECORATIVE WINDOW WOOD TRIM. 21. (N) DECORATIVE WINDOW TRIM TO MATCH (E). 22. (E) DECORATIVE WOOD CORBELS. 23. (E) DECORATIVE WOOD TRIM. 24. SPILT-FACE CMU BLOCK. 25. (N) WINDOW TO MATCH DESIGN OF ADJACENT (N) VERTICAL LIFT WOOD FRAME GLASS WINDOW. PAINT FRAME PER COLOR AS SHOWN. 26. (N) ALUMINUM STOREFRONT/WINDOW SYSTEM w/ OPACI-COAT 3-0586 MEDIUM GRAY SPANDREL GLAZING. # 2GTYP. 19- 4D 5I 6F EXTERIOR COLORS & FINISHES KEYNOTES A. (E) COLOR & MATERIAL, NO CHANGE PROPOSED U.N.O. B. COLOR TO MATCH: SHERWIN-WILLIAMS, SW7041 "VAN DYKE BROWN" C. COLOR TO MATCH: SHERWIN-WILLIAMS, SW2824 "RENWICK GOLDEN OAK" D. COLOR TO MATCH: SHERWIN-WILLIAMS, SW0041 "DARK HUNTER GREEN" E. - F. COLOR TO MATCH: OMEGA STUCCO, "AUTUMN" G. COLOR TO MATCH: MARAZZI ARTEKO, "GREEN SUBWAY" & GLOSS BLACK" H. COLOR TO MATCH: "TAN" I. COLOR TO MATCH: "DARK BRONZE" J. - K. COLOR TO MATCH ADJACENT SURFACE # 7I 4D 2GTYP. 4D 6F 7I TYP. 50'-0" (EXISTING BUILDING) 50'-0" (NEW ADDITION) ADJACENT BLDG. (NOT A PART) ADJAXXXENT BLDG. (NOT A PART) 6B 9- ± 26'-6" A.F.F.
8'-0"
7'-0"
± 26'-6" A.F.F.
8'-0"
± 15'-4" A.F.F. T.O. PARAPET T.O. PARAPET 2nd FLOOR F.F. ± 26'-6" A.F.F. T.O. PARAPET
15'-4" 2nd FLOOR F.F. 5I 6F 10- AA3.0 5I 13CTYP. 15I 16- 8I 12CTYP. 17- 5I 25C 3'-6" ORIGINAL BLDG SIGN (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) 19- 19- 22C 11K TYP. 1, 13 HTYP. 20DTYP. 23D 3FTYP. 11K 13HTYP. 8I TYP. 21DTYP. 3FTYP. 24H 11K 13H 21D 6FTYP. 1, 13 HTYP. 20DTYP. 26I TYP. 24H 3FTYP. 1, 13 HTYP. 20DTYP. 22CTYP. 23D 1, 14 HTYP. 20DTYP. 13CTYP. 12CTYP. 11K EXTERIOR ELEVATION LEGEND (R) DENOTES EXISTING WINDOW AND/OR DOOR SYSTEM TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED w/ NEW WINDOW AND/OR DOOR SYSTEM INSTALLED WITHIN EXISTING OPENING. (N) DENOTES NEW WINDOW AND/OR DOOR SYSTEM TO BE INSTALLED IN NEW OPENING. 8'-0" Page 283 of 615
1 2
3 4
5 (N) DATABASE: SHEET NUMBER: SCALE: SHEET TITLE CHECKED BY: PROJECT NO: - L. DALE DATE: DRAWN BY:

LA MESA, CA 91942 20268 CD's TONY GAIPA 8301 LA MESA BLVD. LA MESA, CA 91942 P: 619-922-2740 e-mail: [email protected]

LICENSED
A

RCHITECT
STATE
O
O
F
C
A
LIF
R NIA C-38204 RENEWAL 03-31-2021
LE
NO
AR
D
O
E
D
L A 3578 30th Street V. 619.236.0595 San Diego, CA 92104 www.mpa-architects.com F. 619.236.0557 CROSS-SECTIONS A3.0 TYPICAL INSULATION NOTE 1. AT ALL 2x6 STUD EXTERIOR WALLS: INSTALL R-19 BATT INSULATION, U.N.O.; 2. AT ALL 2x4 STUD EXTERIOR WALLS: INSTALL R-15 BATT INSULATION (WHERE OCCURS); 3. AT ALL CEILING/ATTIC AREAS: INSTALL R-38 BATT INSULATION BELOW ROOF DECK & R-13 ABOVE TRUSS BOT. CHORD/CEILING JOIST, U.N.O.; 4. AT ALL FLOOR AREAS: INSTALL R-30 BATT INSULATION, U.N.O.; 5. AT DUCTS LOCATED IN ATTIC SPACE: INSTALL R-8 BATT INSULATION, U.N.O.; CROSS-SECTIONS KEYNOTES 1. ROOF TRUSS PER FRAMING PLAN. 2. INSULATION. REFER TO TYPICAL INSULATION NOTE ON THIS SHEET. 3. FOUNDATION & SLAB SYSTEM PER FOUNDATION PLAN. 4. 2x STUD WALL PER STRUCTURAL PLANS. 5. FLOOR JOIST PER FRAMING PLAN. 6. EXTERIOR FINISH PER STRUCTURAL PLANS. 7. FLOOR TOPPING OVER PLYWOOD SHEATHING PER STRUCTURAL PLANS. PLYWOOD TO BE GLUED & SCREWED TO FLOOR JOIST. 8. FIRE BLK'G AT WALL MID-HEIGHT. 9. CLASS "A ROOFING PER PLANS. 10. INTERIOR NON-BEARING 2x PARTITION PER FLOOR PLAN. 11. INTERIOR STAIRS PER STRUCTURAL PLANS. STAIR TREADS SHALL BE OF UNIFORM SIZE AND SHAPE, EXCEPT THE LARGEST TREAD RUN WITHIN ANY FLIGHT OF STAIRS SHALL NOT EXCEED THE SMALLEST BY MORE THAN 3/8 INCH 12. INTERIOR FINISH PER FINISH SCHEDULE. 13. EXTERIOR PLYWOOD SHEATHING PER STRUCTURAL PLANS. 14. ROOF/FLOOR BEAM PER STRUCTURAL PLANS. 15. 42" HIGH MIN. GUARDRAIL SYSTEM AT BALCONY PER OWNER'S SPECS. GUARDRAIL TO BE DESIGNED TO WITHSTAND A 200-POUND LOAD APPLIED AT ANY POINT, IN ANY DIRECTION AND THAT A 4"Ø SPHERE CANNOT PASS THRU ASSEMBLY AT ANY POINT. 16. PRE-FABRICATED STAIRS (PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS). 17. WINDOW / DOOR SYSTEM PER PLANS & SCHEDULE. 18. (E) 2nd FLOOR (HATCHED PATTERN), NO CHANGE PROPOSED w/ THE EXCEPTION OF INTERIOR STAIR SYSTEM AS SHOWN. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL & STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 19. (E) 1st FLOOR (HATCHED PATTERN), NO CHANGE PROPOSED w/ THE EXCEPTION OF INTERIOR STAIR SYSTEM & FOUNDATION SYSTEM AS SHOWN. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL & STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 20. CANT STRIP. #
12 TYP. 1'-0" 11
6 13 TYP.
3 CROSS-SECTION 1/4"=1'-0"
A 68'-0" (EXISTING BUILDING) 16'-2" (NEW ADDITION) 18 TYP. 5 2 TYP. 7 TYP.
8'-0"
TO MACH (E) TOP PLATE HEIGHT 12 TYP. 2 412 TYP.
2 4
8 3 12
6 3/4" 15 15
26'-6" 16 19 TYP.
14'-0"
TO MACH (E) TOP PLATE HEIGHT 20 TYP.
3'-6"
8'-6" WINDOW HEAD AT EXT. FINISH 3"=1'-0" STUCCO FINISH PER EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS INSULATION PER PLANS 25 GA GI. FLASHING SHIM SPACE ROD & SEALANT STUD WALL PER PLAN GYP. BD. WITH METAL EDGE BEAD PLYWOOD (WHERE OCCURS) DUAL GLAZED WINDOW PER ENERGY ANALYSIS SPECS 24 GA. SHEET METAL DRIP FLASHING w/ HEMMED EDGE, PRE-FINISHED TO MATCH FRAME PAPER BACKED MTL. LATH (WHERE REQ'D AT STUCCO) WOOD TRIM TO MATCH (E) B TYP. WINDOW ELEVATIONS 1/2"=1'-0"
C

HEIGHT PER PLAN WIDTH PER PLAN
1/3 Of
HEIGHT WOOD TRIM TO MATCH (E) DUAL GLAZED WINDOW PER ENERGY ANALYSIS SPECS WOOD CLAD ALUMINUM STILE TO MATCH (E). 1" MUNTINS EQ. EQ.

EQ. EQ.

ICL (E) WINDOW - FOR REFERENCE ONLY (E) WINDOW TO BE REPLACED w/ WOOD CLAD ALUMINUM WINDOWS w/ MUNTINS PER EXT. ELEVATIONS WOOD CLAD ALUMINUM WINDOWS ASSEMBLY PER PLAN Page 284 of 615 Proposal: N/A
Width: N/A
Height: N/A
Sectons: N/A
Design: DOWNTOWN WINDOW- ATTACHMENT DETAIL
Date Approved:

Client Signature:

The specifications presented in this line drawing are
correct and hereby accepted and superseid any
design specifications presented and are final. By
signing this drawing you are authorizing Garage Doors
Unlimited to do the work as specified and agree to the
terms and conditions as presented on this drawing
13200 Kirkham Way, Ste 102
Poway, CA 92064
858-668-0934 fx 858-688-3581

NAME DATE
DRAWN SLP 9.22.20
REP S.ALIX

TYPICAL ELEVATION VIEW

Page 285 of 615 ends

ATTACHMENT
D

Page 286 of 615 ends

REPORT to the MAYOR and MEMBERS of the CITY COUNCIL
From the CITY MANAGER
DATE: June 14, 2022
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A STANDARD

AGREEMENT FOR SPECIALIZED PROFESSIONAL

SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF LA MESA AND
BUREAU VERITAS NORTH AMERICA, INC. FOR

BUILDING DIVISION STAFF AUGMENTATION

SERVICES FOR UP TO A SIX MONTH PERIOD
ISSUING DEPARTMENT: Community Development
SUMMARY:

Issues:

Should the City Council authorize a Standard Agreement for Specialized Professional Services between the City of La Mesa and Bureau Veritas North America, Inc. for Building Division Staff Augmentation Services? Recommendation:

Approve the attached resolution authorizing a Standard Agreement for Specialized Professional Services between the City of La Mesa and Bureau Veritas North America, Inc. for Building Division Staff Augmentation Services.

Fiscal Impact:

The procurement of Building Division staff augmentation services is anticipated in the Building Division budget and funds in the amount of $200,000 are available from account 2301-6430. Expenses incurred are recovered through building permit and inspection fees.

City’s Strategic Goals:
 Continue to improve high quality municipal services

Page 287 of 615 ends

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: June 14, 2022
Page: 2 of 3
BACKGROUND:

The City has seen an upward trend in building permit activity in the past several years, in particular and most recently apartment and accessory dwelling unit (ADU) activity, and expects this trend to continue. Building permit applications require qualified staff to be available to complete plan checks and inspections in a timely manner. Flexible contract building services allow the City the ability to provide a consistent level of service to building permit applicants as building permit activity ebbs and flows.

Bureau Veritas North America, Inc. (Bureau Veritas) has provided staff augmentation services to the Building Division since 2014 when activity exceeds the capacity of City staff. Bureau Veritas provides highly qualified and credentialed professionals with many years of experience in providing technical and professional building staff services.

The City periodically conducts RFQ and Requests for Proposals (RFP) to identify qualified professional service providers to ensure that the City retains the most qualified providers at a reasonable cost. The City conducted a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) process for various professional services in 2018. Bureau Veritas was selected through the RFQ process to provide Building Division staff augmentation services. The current agreement with Bureau Veritas expires June 30, 2022.

DISCUSSION:

Staff initiated an RFP process for Building Division services on June 9, 2022, and anticipates completing the process to present a new agreement to the City Council in late summer to early fall. To ensure uninterrupted service to Building Division customers during the RFP process, staff requests that the City Council authorize a six-month agreement with Bureau Veritas for Building Division services. The agreement would be effective July 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022, or until such time the City enters a new agreement for Building Division services, whichever comes first.

CONCLUSION:

Staff recommends that the Council authorize the Mayor to execute a Standard Agreement for Specialized Professional Services between the City of La Mesa and Bureau Veritas North America, Inc. for Building Division services effective July 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022, or until such time the City enters a new agreement for Building Division services, whichever comes first.

Page 288 of 615 ends

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: June 14, 2022
Page: 3 of 3
Reviewed by: Respectfully submitted by:
____________________ ____________________________
Greg Humora Kerry Kusiak
City Manager Director of Community Development
Attachments: A. Resolution authorizing an agreement with Bureau Veritas B. Standard Agreement for Specialized Professional Services between the City of La Mesa and Bureau Veritas North America, Inc.

Page 289 of 615 ends

Page 290 of 615 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-_____

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA

AUTHORIZING A STANDARD AGREEMENT FOR SPECIALIZED

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF LA MESA AND
BUREAU VERITAS NORTH AMERICA, INC. FOR BUILDING DIVISION STAFF

AUGMENTATION SERVICES FOR UP TO A SIX MONTH PERIOD
________________________________________________________________ WHEREAS, one of the City of La Mesa's strategic goals is to continue providing high quality municipal services;
WHEREAS, the City has a need for professional building division services in keeping with this goal;
WHEREAS, Bureau Veritas North America, Inc. (Bureau Veritas) provides highly qualified and credentialed professionals with many years of experience in providing building division services;
WHEREAS, Bureau Veritas has provided City with technical and professional services in the area of Building Division service staff augmentation since 2014; WHEREAS, Bureau Veritas was selected to provide Building Division services staff augmentation in a formal request for proposals in 2018; WHEREAS, the current agreement with Bureau Veritas expires June 30, 2022; WHEREAS, the City is conducting a Requests for Proposals (RFP) process for a service provider for building division services that will not be completed until fall 2022; and WHEREAS, the City requires professional building division services support to continue uninterrupted while the RFP process is completed.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, that the Mayor is hereby authorized and instructed to execute a Standard Agreement for Specialized Professional Services between the City of La Mesa and Bureau Veritas North America, Inc. for building division services for the period from July 1, 2022, to December 21, 2022, or until such time he City enters a new agreement for building division services, whichever comes first, and for an amount not to exceed $200,000.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 14th day of June, 2022, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

Page 291 of 615 ends

CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2022-____, duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited.

MEGAN WIEGELMAN, City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)

Page 292 of 615 ends

DRAFT
- 1 -

STANDARD AGREEMENT FOR SPECIALIZED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

BETWEEN THE CITY OF LA MESA AND
BUREAU VERITAS NORTH AMERICA, INC.

FOR BUILDING DIVISION STAFF AUGMENTATION SERVICES
This Agreement is entered into by City of La Mesa as of this day of _____________, 2022, by and between the City of La Mesa, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "the City", and Bureau Veritas North America, Inc., hereinafter referred to as "Consultant." WITNESSETH THAT:

WHEREAS, the City has adopted Resolution No. 2022-___;
WHEREAS, the City has need for professional services in the area of building division staff augmentation services and is willing to compensate Consultant for such services; WHEREAS, Consultant provides highly qualified and credentialed professionals with many years of experience in providing building division staff augmentation services; WHEREAS, Consultant has provided City with technical and professional services in the area of building division staff augmentation services since 2014; WHEREAS, Consultant was selected to provide building division staff augmentation services in a formal request for proposals in 2018; and WHEREAS, the City is conducting a Requests for Proposals (RFP) process for a service provider for building division services that will not be completed until fall 2022; and WHEREAS, the City requires professional building division services support to continue uninterrupted while the RFP process is completed.

WHEREAS, the City desires to continue to engage Consultant to render certain technical and professional services in the area of building division staff augmentation services until December 31, 2022, or until such time that the City enters a new agreement for such services based on the outcome of the RFP process.

NOW THEREFORE, the parties do mutually agree as follows:

SECTION 1: ENGAGEMENT OF CONSULTANT
The City hereby agrees to engage Consultant and Consultant hereby agrees to perform the services set forth in this Agreement.

Page 293 of 615 ends

DRAFT
- 2 -
SECTION 2: SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY CONSULTANT
The effective date of this Agreement shall be July 1, 2022. This Agreement shall expire December 31, 2022, or until such time that City enters a new agreement for building division services. The term "Project" as used in this Agreement shall include all of the tasks and items listed and described in Exhibit ‘A,’ attached hereto and incorporated herein as part of this Agreement.

SECTION 3: KEY PROJECT PERSONNEL
Consultant agrees to provide the professional services for the full term of this contract. The City reserves the right to approve Consultant personnel that will provide services to the City.

No substitutions will be made without prior written approval by the City. The City reserves the right to request specific qualifications for personnel substituted under this section.

SECTION 4: CITY REPRESENTATION
The Director of Community Development for the City of La Mesa, or its designated representative, shall represent the City in all matters pertaining to the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement and shall administer said Agreement on behalf of the City. This person shall hereinafter be referred to as the "City's Representative." SECTION 5: COMPENSATION TO CONSULTANT
The City shall compensate the Consultant for professional services rendered pursuant to this Agreement in accordance with the Fee Schedule in Exhibit ‘A.’ The cost of services shall not exceed $200,000.

SECTION 6: METHOD OF COMPENSATION
The City shall compensate Consultant for the services performed hereunder on a monthly basis within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of Consultant's invoice for the services performed. The Consultant shall provide documentation regarding time-and-material charges sufficient to meet normal auditing practice.

The City shall promptly review invoicing and notify Consultant of any objection thereto in writing within fifteen (15) days of receipt of the invoice; absent such objection the invoice shall be deemed proper and acceptable.

In the event that any undisputed invoice is not paid within thirty (30) calendar days after receipt of the invoice by the City, it shall commence bearing interest on the date that the invoice was rendered at the rate of 1% per month and the City agrees to pay all accrued interest, together with the charges for services rendered.

Page 294 of 615 ends

DRAFT
- 3 -
SECTION 7: HOLD HARMLESS
To the furthest extent allowed by law, including California Civil Code section 2782.8, Consultant shall indemnify, hold harmless and defend City and each of its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers from any and all loss, liability, fines, penalties, forfeitures, costs and damages (whether in contract, tort or strict liability, including but not limited to personal injury, death at any time and property damage), and from any and all claims, demands and actions in law or equity (including reasonable attorney's fees and litigation expenses) to the extent that any loss, liability, fines, penalties, forfeitures, costs, damages, claims, demands or actions in law or equity arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct of Consultant, its principals, officers, employees or agents in the performance of this Agreement. However, notwithstanding the previous sentence, in the event one or more defendants is unable to pay its share of defense costs due to bankruptcy or dissolution of the business, the design professional shall meet and confer with other parties regarding unpaid defense costs.

If Consultant should subcontract all or any portion of the services to be performed under this Agreement, Consultant shall require each sub-consultant to indemnify, hold harmless and defend City and each of its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers in accordance with the terms of the preceding paragraph.

This section shall survive termination or expiration of this Agreement.

SECTION 8: INSURANCE
Throughout the life of this Agreement, Consultant shall pay for and maintain in full force and effect all policies of insurance required hereunder with an insurance company(ies) either (i) admitted by the California Insurance Commissioner to do business in the State of California and rated not less than "A- VII" in Best's Insurance Rating Guide, or (ii) authorized by the City Manager or his/her designee at any time and in his/her sole discretion. The following policies of insurance are required:
(i) COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY insurance which shall be at least as broad as the most current version of Insurance Services Office (ISO) Commercial General Liability Coverage Form CG 00 01 and include insurance for “bodily injury,” “property damage” and “personal and advertising injury” with coverage for premises and operations (including the use of owned and non-owned equipment), products and completed operations, and contractual liability (including, without limitation, indemnity obligations under the Contract) with limits of liability of not less than the following:
$1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage $1,000,000 per occurrence for personal and advertising injury $1,000,000 aggregate for products and completed operations $2,000,000 general aggregate

Page 295 of 615 ends

DRAFT
- 4 -
(ii) COMMERCIAL AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY insurance which shall be at least as broad as the most current version of Insurance Service Office (ISO) Business Auto Coverage Form CA 00 01, and include coverage for all owned, hired, and non-owned automobiles or other licensed vehicles (Code 1 - Any Auto) with limits of liability of not less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. (iii) WORKERS' COMPENSATION insurance as required under the California Labor Code.
(iv) EMPLOYERS’ LIABILITY insurance with limits of liability of not less than $1,000,000 each accident, $1,000,000 disease policy limit and $1,000,000 disease each employee.
(v) PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY (ERRORS AND OMISSIONS) insurance appropriate to Consultant’s profession, with limits of liability of not less than $1,000,000 per claim/occurrence and $2,000,000 policy aggregate.

Should Consultant maintain insurance with broader coverage and/or limits of liability greater than those shown above, City requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or the higher limits of liability maintained by Consultant. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to City.

Consultant shall be responsible for payment of any deductibles contained in any insurance policies required hereunder and Consultant shall also be responsible for payment of any selfinsured retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to, and approved by, the City Manager or his/her designee. At the option of the City Manager or his/her designee, either: (i) the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects to City, its elected officials, officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers: or (ii) Consultant shall provide a financial guarantee, satisfactory to City Manager or his/her designee, guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses. At no time shall City be responsible for the payment of any deductibles or self-insured retentions.

All policies of insurance required hereunder shall be endorsed to provide that the coverage shall not be cancelled, non-renewed, reduced in coverage or in limits except after 30 calendar day written notice has been given to City. Upon issuance by the insurer, broker, or agent of a notice of cancellation, non-renewal, or reduction in coverage or in limits, Consultant shall furnish City with a new certificate and applicable endorsements for such policy(ies). In the event any policy is due to expire during the work to be performed for City, Consultant shall provide a new certificate, and applicable endorsements, evidencing renewal of such policy not less than 15 calendar days prior to the expiration date of the expiring policy.

The General Liability and Automobile Liability insurance policies shall be written on an occurrence form and shall name City, its elected officials, officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers as an additional insured. Such policy(ies) of insurance shall be endorsed so Consultant’s insurance shall be primary and no contribution shall be required of City, its elected

Page 296 of 615 ends

DRAFT
- 5 -
officials, officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City, its elected officials, officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers. The Workers’ Compensation insurance policy shall contain a waiver of subrogation as to City, its elected officials, officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers.

If the Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions) insurance policy is written on a claims-made form:

1. The retroactive date must be shown, and must be before the effective date of the Agreement or the commencement of work by Consultant.

2. Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least 3 years after any expiration or termination of the Agreement or, in the alternative, the policy shall be endorsed to provide not less than a 3-year discovery period.

3. If coverage is canceled or non-renewed, and not replaced with another claims-made policy form with a retroactive date prior to the effective date of the Agreement or the commencement of work by Consultant, Consultant must purchase extended reporting coverage for a minimum of 3 years following the expiration or termination of the Agreement.

4. A copy of the claims reporting requirements must be submitted to City for review.

5. These requirements shall survive expiration or termination of the Agreement.

Consultant shall furnish City with all certificate(s) and applicable endorsements effecting coverage required hereunder. All certificates and applicable endorsements are to be received by City and approved by City Manager or his/her designee prior to City’s execution of the Agreement and before work commences. Upon request of City, Consultant shall immediately furnish City with a complete copy of any insurance policy required under this Agreement, including all endorsements, with said copy certified by the underwriter to be a true and correct copy of the original policy. This requirement shall survive expiration or termination of this Agreement.

If at any time during the life of this Agreement or any extension, Consultant or any of its subconsultants fail to maintain any required insurance in full force and effect, all work under this Agreement shall be discontinued immediately, and all payments due or that become due to Consultant shall be withheld until notice is received by City that the required insurance has been restored to full force and effect and that the premiums therefore have been paid for a period satisfactory to City. Any failure to maintain the required insurance shall be sufficient cause for City to terminate this Agreement. No action taken by City hereunder shall in any way relieve Consultant of its responsibilities under this Agreement.

The fact that insurance is obtained by Consultant shall not be deemed to release or diminish the liability of Consultant, including, without limitation, liability under the indemnity provisions of this Agreement. The duty to indemnify City and its elected officials, officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers shall apply to all claims and liability regardless of whether any insurance policies are applicable. The policy limits do not act as a limitation upon the amount of indemnification to be provided by Consultant. Approval or purchase of any insurance contracts

Page 297 of 615 ends

DRAFT
- 6 -
or policies shall in no way relieve from liability nor limit the liability of Consultant, its principals, officers, employees, agents, persons under the supervision of Consultant, vendors, suppliers, invitees, Consultants, sub-consultants, or anyone employed directly or indirectly by any of them.

If Consultant should subcontract all or any portion of the services to be performed under this Agreement, Consultant shall require each sub-consultant to provide insurance protection in favor of City, its elected officials, officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers in accordance with the terms of each of the preceding paragraphs, except that the sub-consultants' certificates and endorsements shall be on file with Consultant and City prior to the commencement of any work by the sub-consultant.

SECTION 9: ASSIGNABILITY
Consultant shall not assign, delegate, or transfer this Agreement or any work hereunder, nor assign any monies due or to become due hereunder, except as expressly stated herein. In no event shall any contractual relation be created between any third party and the City without prior written consent of the City. Consent to one assignment shall not be deemed to be consent to any subsequent assignment.

SECTION 10: INTEGRATION; AMENDMENTS
This Agreement sets forth the entire understanding of the parties with respect to the subject matter herein. There are no other agreements, expressed or implied, oral or written, except as set forth herein. This Agreement may be amended upon written mutual consent of both parties hereto. Amendment requiring changes in compensation shall be subject to the City's change order procedures.

SECTION 11: NOTICES
Notices and requests to the City or Consultant shall be delivered at the following addresses, either served personally on the designated representative or by U.S. Postal Service at the following addresses:

City:

Director of Community Development
City of La Mesa
8130 Allison Avenue
La Mesa, CA 91942
(619) 667-1185
FAX (619) 667-1380/
Consultant:

Mohammad Heivand
Regional Operations Officer
Bureau Veritas North America, Inc.
9988 Hibert Street Suite 100
San Diego, CA 92131
(858) 863-2013
FAX (858) 451-2846

Page 298 of 615 ends

DRAFT
- 7 -
SECTION 12: DISPUTE RESOLUTION
The City shall require that all Consultants agree to submit any unresolved claims, counterclaims, disputes, controversies and other matters between them and the City or the Consultant and/or any sub-consultants of any tier arising out of or relating to their agreement with the City or the breach thereof (“disputes”) first to mediation and then if not resolved, to non-binding arbitration prior to initiating suit or judicial proceeding.

SECTION 13: TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT FOR CAUSE OR CONVENIENCE If, through any cause, the Consultant shall fail to fulfill in timely and proper manner his obligations under this Agreement, or if the Consultant shall violate any of the covenants, agreements, or stipulations of this Agreement, the City shall thereupon have the right to terminate this Agreement immediately by giving written notice to the Consultant of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof. In such event, all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs and reports prepared by the Consultant under this Agreement shall, at the option of the City, become its property and the Consultant shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any work satisfactorily completed hereunder.

In addition to termination for cause, the City may terminate this Agreement for City’s convenience upon not less than fifteen (15) days written notice to Consultant. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement unless said notice provides otherwise. If this Agreement is terminated as provided in this paragraph for City’s convenience, the Consultant shall be required to provide to City all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, services, etc., prepared by the Consultant as may be requested by City and such work shall become City’s property upon payment to Consultant for the value of the work performed, less payments of compensation previously made.

Notwithstanding the above, the Consultant shall not be relieved of liability to the City for damages sustained by the City by virtue of any breach of the Agreement by the Consultant, and the City may withhold any payments to the Consultant for the purpose of set-off until such time as the exact amount of damages due the City from the Consultant is determined.

SECTION 14: BUSINESS LICENSE
The Consultant, including all sub-consultants, shall obtain a business license for work within the City of La Mesa pursuant to La Mesa Municipal Code Sections 6.08.010 through 6.08.240.

No payments shall be made to any Consultant until such business license has been obtained, and all fees paid therefor, by the Consultant and all sub-consultants. Business license applications and information may be obtained from the Finance Department, City Hall, 8130 Allison Avenue, La Mesa, CA 91942-5502, (619) 667-1118 or online at cityoflamesa.us/buslic.

Page 299 of 615 ends

DRAFT
- 8 -
SECTION 15: INTEREST OF MEMBERS OF THE CITY
No member of the governing body of the City and no other officer, employee, or agent of the City who exercises any functions or responsibilities in connection with the planning and carrying out of the program, shall have any personal financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement; and the Consultant shall take appropriate steps to assure compliance.

SECTION 16: INTEREST OF CONSULTANT AND EMPLOYEES; STATEMENT OF

ECONOMIC INTERESTS
The Consultant covenants that he presently has no interest and shall not acquire interest, direct or indirect, in the study area or any parcels therein or any other interest which would conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of his services hereunder. The Consultant further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed. City may require Consultant to complete and submit a Form 700, Statement of Economic Interests, in accordance with applicable law, to City Clerk.

SECTION 17: FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT
Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, furnish all facilities and equipment which may be required for furnishing services pursuant to this Agreement.

SECTION 18: INDEPENDENT CONSULTANT
At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall be an independent Consultant and shall not be an employee of City. City shall have the right to control Consultant only insofar as the results of Consultant's services rendered pursuant to this Agreement; however, City shall not have the right to control the means by which Consultant accomplishes services rendered pursuant to this Agreement.

SECTION 19: PERS ELIGIBILITY INDEMNIFICATION
In the event that Consultant’s employee providing services under this Agreement claims or is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction or the California Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) to be eligible for enrollment in PERS of the City, Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City for the payment of any employer and employee contributions for PERS benefits on behalf of the employee as well as for payment of any penalties and interest on such contributions which would otherwise be the responsibility of the City.

Notwithstanding any other agency, state or federal policy, rule, regulation, law or ordinance to the contrary, Consultant’s employees providing service under this Agreement shall not qualify for or become entitled to, and hereby agree to waive any claims to, any compensation and benefit including but not limited to eligibility to enroll in PERS as an employee of City and entitlement to any contributions to be paid by City for employer contributions and/or employee contributions for PERS benefits.

Page 300 of 615 ends

DRAFT
- 9 -
SECTION 20: TIME
Consultant shall devote such time to the performance of services pursuant to this Agreement as may be reasonably necessary for satisfactory performance of Consultant's obligations pursuant to this Agreement.

SECTION 21: CONSULTANT NOT AGENT
Except as City may specify in writing, Consultant shall have no authority, express or implied, to act on behalf of City in any capacity whatsoever as an agent. Consultant shall have no authority, express or implied, pursuant to this Agreement to bind City to any obligation whatsoever.

SECTION 22: NON-DISCLOSURE
The designs, plans, reports, investigations, materials and documents prepared or acquired by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement (including any duplicate copies kept by the Consultant) shall not be shown to any other public or private person or entity, except as authorized by the City. The Consultant shall not disclose to any other public or private person or entity any information regarding the activities of the City except as authorized by the City.

SECTION 23: SUBCONTRACTING
None of the services covered by the Agreement shall be subcontracted without the prior consent of the City. The Consultant shall be as fully responsible to the City for the acts and omissions of his sub-consultants, and of persons either directly or indirectly employed by them, as he is for the acts and omissions of persons directly employed by him. The Consultant shall insert in each subcontract appropriate provisions requiring compliance with the labor standards provisions of this Agreement.

SECTION 24: CHANGES
The City may, from time to time, request changes in the Scope of Services of the Contract to be performed hereunder. Such changes, including any increase or decrease in the amount of the Consultant's compensation, which are mutually agreed upon by and between the City and the Consultant shall be incorporated to this Contract.

SECTION 25: JOB SITE SAFETY
The general or prime Consultant who is responsible for means, methods and procedures of the project shall be responsible for job site safety.

The prime Consultant and all sub-consultants of all tiers shall:

A. Be responsible for the safety of their respective employees as required by law.

B. Come under the jurisdiction and supervision of the general or prime Consultant’s job site safety program.

Page 301 of 615 ends

DRAFT
- 10 -
C. Exercise reasonable care to avoid risk of injury to others as required by the professional standard of care.

SECTION 26: CONFLICT BETWEEN AGREEMENT AND OTHER DOCUMENTS In the event of a conflict between this Agreement and any documents incorporated by reference in this Agreement, the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall supersede those contained in any such document incorporated by reference.

SECTION 27: DATE OF AGREEMENT
The date of this Agreement shall be the date it shall have been signed by a duly authorized representative of City.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Consultant have executed the Agreement.

Bureau Veritas North America, Inc.

Date: By:

Mohammad Heivand,
Regional Operations Officer

CITY OF LA MESA,
A Municipal Corporation
Date: By:

Mark Arapostathis, Mayor
Date: Attest:

Megan Wiegelman, City Clerk
Date: By:

Greg Humora, City Manager
Date: By:

Kerry Kusiak,
Director of Community Development

APPROVED AS TO FORM
Glenn Sabine CITY ATTORNEY
Attachment: Exhibit A – Fee Schedule

Page 302 of 615 ends

DRAFT
BUREAU VERITAS 9988 Hibert Street, Suite 100, San Diego, CA 92131 P 858.863.2000 | www.bvna.com
1 FEE SCHEDULE
6/3/2022
Kerry Kusiak | Director of Community Development
City of La Mesa | 8130 Allison Avenue | La Mesa, CA 91942 Email: [email protected] | www.cityoflamesa.com
Re: Contracted Building Services for Fiscal Year 2022/2023 Dear Mr. Kusiak,
Bureau Veritas North America, Inc. (BVNA) is pleased to submit our proposal and commitment to provide plan review and inspection services to the City of La Mesa for Fiscal Year 2021/2022. Below we have identified our proposed fees for plan review and inspection. Should you have any questions or would like additional information, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Plan Review Percentage of Fee:

BVNA will collect 65% of the City’s collected building plan review fee as noted in the City of La Mesa Fee Schedule for Fiscal Year 2021/2022.
*Percentage of fee includes the first review plus two (3) rechecks. Third and subsequent rechecks, approved plan revisions, and deferred submittals will be conducted hourly using the rates below.

Schedule of Hourly Rates:

Position Billing Rate Per Hour
Building Safety
Project Manager/Building Official $153
Structural Engineer $135
MEP Engineer $123
Senior Plans Examiner $118
CASp $112
ICC Certified Plans Examiner $102
Combination/Building Inspector $90
Sr. Permit Technician $80
Fire Plan Review and Inspection
Fire Plans Examiner $113
Fire Inspector $102
Public Works and Civil Plan Review
Civil Plan Review Engineer $141
Licensed Land Surveyor (Map Review) $128
Planning
Associate Planner $128
Proposal No. 4231142

EXHIBIT A

Page 303 of 615 ends

DRAFT
BUREAU VERITAS 9988 Hibert Street, Suite 100, San Diego, CA 92131 P 858.863.2000 | www.bvna.com
2 FEE SCHEDULE
• Mileage incurred to be invoiced at IRS rate
• Rate presented are non-union / non-prevailing wage
• On-Site services may require a daily per-diem; per-diem will be calculated using Federal GSA rates for the County of San Diego. Per-Diem will only be invoiced with City approval.

We can provide additional information regarding our qualifications and previous experience should you request. Bureau Veritas North America, Inc. looks forward to continuing its strong and successful partnership with the City of La Mesa.

Sincerely,
Moe Heivand, P.E. Craig Baptista
Regional Operations Manager Vice President - Facilities Division, West Region Bureau Veritas North America, Inc. Bureau Veritas North America, Inc. 9988 Hibert Street, Suite 100 180 Promenade Circle, Suite 150 San Diego, CA 92131 Sacramento, CA 95834
Direct: 858.863.2013 Direct: 916.514.4516
Cell: 858.353.8058 Cell: 916.291.9151
[email protected] [email protected]

Page 304 of 615 ends

REPORT to the MAYOR and MEMBERS of the CITY COUNCIL
From the CITY MANAGER
DATE: June 14, 2022
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION INCREASING THE BUDGET FOR

BUILDING DIVISION PROFESSIONAL AND
SPECIALIZED SERVICES ACCOUNT BY $200,000
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021-2022
ISSUING DEPARTMENT: Community Development
SUMMARY:

Issues:

Should the City of La Mesa increase the budget for Building Division Professional and Specialized Services account by $200,000 for FY 2021-22? Recommendation:

Approve the attached resolution to increase the budget for Building Division Professional and Specialized Services account by $200,000 for FY 2021-22.

Fiscal Impact:

The increase in budgeted funds is requested to be appropriated from General Fund reserves. The increase in expenditures will be directly offset by building permit and plan check revenues.

City’s Strategic Goals:
 Continue to improve high quality municipal services
BACKGROUND:

In November 2014, the City Council entered an agreement with Bureau Veritas North America, Inc. (BV) for building inspection services, including plan check services. The agreement was renewed several times with the current term of agreement expiring June 30, 2022. For Fiscal

Page 305 of 615 ends

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: June 14, 2022
Page: 2 of 2
Year 2021-22, the Building Division Professional and Specialized Services budget included $325,000 for expenditures associated with the agreement.

DISCUSSION:

Plan check, permit, and construction activities have continued at a high level, resulting in revenues and costs in excess of the budgeted amounts for the fiscal year. To maintain the fulltime support needed for the remainder of Fiscal Year 2021-22, staff requests an additional $200,000 be appropriated from the General Fund for the BV agreement, increasing the annual budget amount in the Building Division Professional and Specialized Services account for this purpose from $325,000 to $525,000. The building services provided by BV are directly supported by fees collected for building plan check, permit, and inspection, and the expenditure of the increased budgeted funds will be directly offset by revenue from these fees. As of June 1, 2022, Building Division revenues are approximately 175% of originally projected revenue, which is proportional to the budget increase requested.

CONCLUSION:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution to increase the budget in the Building Division Professional and Specialized Services account (2301-6430) by $200,000 for Fiscal Year 2021-22.

Reviewed by: Respectfully submitted by:
____________________ ____________________________
Greg Humora Kerry Kusiak
City Manager Director of Community Development
Attachments: Resolution

Page 306 of 615 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA TO

INCREASE THE BUDGET FOR BUILDING DIVISION PROFESSIONAL AND SPECIALIZED SERVICES ACCOUNT BY $200,000 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021- 2022
WHEREAS, one of the City of La Mesa’s strategic goals is to continue to provide high quality municipal services;
WHEREAS, the City has a need for professional building services in keeping with this goal;
WHEREAS, the Building Division Professional and Specialized Services account (2301- 6430) budgeted amount of $358,200 includes $325,000 for the purpose of providing professional building division services;
WHEREAS, the City continues to see a high level of private development and building permit applications, with associated revenues and expenditures exceeding anticipated levels; WHEREAS, the City of La Mesa has had agreements since 2014 with Bureau Veritas North America, Inc. (Bureau Veritas) to provide professional building services, including plan check, permit, and inspection services, and has a current agreement for Fiscal Year 2021-22; WHEREAS, the City desires to continue to utilize professional building division services from Bureau Veritas to provide Building Division staff support to ensure that the level of service provided to applicants does not diminish;
WHEREAS, the costs incurred by the City in utilizing Bureau Veritas for professional building division services are directly offset by building permit and plan check revenues; and WHEREAS, the Building Division Professional and Specialized Services account (2301- 6430) needs to be increased by $200,000 to maintain the Building Division support needed for the remainder of Fiscal Year 2021-22, for a total of $558,200 for the Fiscal Year.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, that:

1. $200,000 is appropriated from General Fund reserves to increase the budgeted amount for the Building Division Professional and Specialized Services account (2301-6430) for Fiscal Year 2021-22 to $558,200.

Page 307 of 615 ends

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 14th day of June 2022, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2022- , duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited.

MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL OF C!TY)

Page 308 of 615 ends

REPORT to the MAYOR and MEMBERS of the CITY COUNCIL
From the CITY MANAGER
DATE: June 14, 2022
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF THE FINAL MAP FOR LA MESA
TRACT 16-01 (HIGH ST 34 LC), A ONE-LOT
SUBDIVISION FOR A 32-UNIT CONDOMINIUM

DEVELOPMENT ON THE NORTH SIDE OF HIGH
STREET, A PRIVATE ROAD, APN 499-010-02-00 AND
499-010-03-00 IN THE R1S (SUBURBAN

RESIDENTIAL) ZONE
ISSUING DEPARTMENT: Public Works / Community Development SUMMARY:

Issue:

Is the Final Map consistent with the Tentative Tract Map for TTM 16-01 and the conditions of approval, and does it meet the City’s regulations and requirements? Recommendation:

Adopt a resolution (Attachment A) to approve the Final Map for La Mesa Tract 16-01.

Fiscal Impact:

There would be no impact to the General Fund related to this project. City of La Mesa policy is to recover 100% of the cost of staff time through discretionary application and permit fees. The City would collect increased property tax revenue from the development upon completion.

City’s Strategic Goals:
 Revitalize neighborhoods and corridors
 Ensure safe and affordable homes for La Mesa's current and future residents

Page 309 of 615 ends

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: June 14, 2022
Page: 2 of 4
Environmental Review:

Approval of a Final Map is a ministerial action not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under CEQA Guidelines Section 15268(b)(3).

BACKGROUND:

A tentative tract map was approved in 2017 for a one-lot, 34-unit condominium subdivision on the site of a former rock quarry located on High Street, a private road, approximately one-half mile east of High Street. The 8.5-acre site is comprised of a relatively level quarry basin surrounded in a rough semi-circle by a steep escarpment.

At the top of the escarpment is a moderate to steeply sloped hillside that is generally inaccessible.

The private road on which the project has frontage is improved with sidewalk, curb, gutter, and street lights. Surrounding development includes MTS right-of-way to the south, a Navy housing development to the north and east, single-family residential development at the top of the slope to the northwest, and undeveloped open space to the west. A vicinity map is provided below. The Assessor Parcel Map sheet is provided as Attachment B, and photos of the project site are provided as Attachment C.

A Planned Residential Development
(PRD) was approved concurrently with the
tentative map for a multi-family housing
development within the quarry basin. The
project entitlement included a variance to
reduce a building setback along the west
side property line and a special permit for
terraced walls along the front of the site
supporting fill in excess of prescribed
limits. Planning Commission Resolution
PC 2017-18 approving the tentative tract
map and site development plan is
provided as Attachment D and City
Council Resolution No. 2017-104 ratifying
the Planning Commission’s approval is
provided as Attachment E. The approved
tentative tract map is provided as
Attachment F.

Page 310 of 615 ends

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: June 14, 2022
Page: 3 of 4
In 2019, the applicant requested and received approval to incorporate affordable housing into the project under California Government Code Section 65915 and La Mesa Municipal Code Chapter 24.053. Ten percent of the units were designated as affordable to moderate income households, defined as those earning up to 120 percent of the area median income. The Development Advisory Board Certification of Action from January 14, 2019, approving the modification, is provided as Attachment G.

In 2022, the site development plan was revised for a second time, to a 32-unit detached housing development clustered around a looped drive aisle, all within the same development footprint at the base of the quarry. The quarry escarpment and upslope areas remain undisturbed. Instead of six three-story buildings with garaged parking, the new building type is individual two-story units with detached single-car carports. The project continues to provide four (4) affordable units. Project revisions, including additional project conditions of approval, are memorialized in Notice of Decision 2022- 06 (Attachment H). The approved project plans are provided as Attachment I.

DISCUSSION:

The Final Map (Attachment J) conforms to the requirements of the approved tentative map and all conditions of the tentative tract map have been satisfied to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director and the Director of Public Works/City Engineer.

The subdivision meets the required findings for approval set forth in the Subdivision Ordinance and is consistent with the La Mesa General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. The site’s zoning and planned land use have not changed since the map was approved.

A draft Declaration of Covenants (CC&Rs) prepared by the applicant was reviewed by staff to verify that all City requirements have been incorporated. The CC&Rs will record concurrently with the Final Map to memorialize the obligations of the HOA.

CONCLUSION:

Adopt a resolution (Attachment A) to approve the Final Map for La Mesa Tract 16-01.

Reviewed by: Respectfully submitted by:
____________________ ____________________________
Greg Humora Michael Throne, PE
City Manager Director of Public Works
____________________________
Kerry Kusiak
Director of Community Development

Page 311 of 615 ends

Report to Mayor and Councilmembers
Date: June 14, 2022
Page: 4 of 4
Attachments:

A. Draft City Council Resolution
B. Assessor Parcel Map Sheet
C. Site Photographs
D. Planning Commission Resolution PC-2017-18
E. City Council Resolution No. 2017-104
F. Approved Tentative Tract Map
G. Development Advisory Board Resolution DAB-2019-02
H. Notice of Decision 2022-06
I. Approved Project Plans
J. La Mesa Tract 16-01

Page 312 of 615 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA
APPROVING THE FINAL MAP FOR LA MESA TRACT NO. 16-01 (HIGH STREET 34 LC), A ONE-LOT, 32-UNIT RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM

DEVELOPMENT ON THE NORTH SIDE OF HIGH STREET, A PRIVATE ROAD APN 499-010-02-00 AND 499-010-03-00 IN THE R1S (SUBURBAN

RESIDENTIAL) ZONE
WHEREAS, on September 20, 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of La Mesa did hold a duly noticed public hearing, received and considered a staff report, accepted public testimony, and approved tentative tract map TTM 16-01 and site development plan DAB 16-13 for a one-lot, 34-unit residential condominium development on the north side of High Street, a private road, in the R1S (Suburban Residential) zone;
WHEREAS, on October 24, 2017, the City Council of the City of La Mesa ratified the Planning Commission’s approval of the project;
WHEREAS, a proposed revision to reduce the project to 32 condominium units, Project 2021-35, was approved on May 30, 2022;
WHEREAS, an action to approve a Final Map is a ministerial action not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under CEQA Guidelines Section 15268(b)(3); WHEREAS, a final map for the project has been submitted to the City Council, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and
WHEREAS, the City Council did receive and consider a staff report on the request for approval of a final map.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of La Mesa finds and determines as follows:

1. That the proposed subdivision conforms to the provisions of the City of La Mesa Subdivision Ordinance and the Subdivision Map Act, California Code Section 66410 et seq.

2. That the final map is in substantial compliance with the approved tentative tract map TTM 16-01.

3. That the final map, including its provisions for design and improvement, is consistent with the City of La Mesa General Plan.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Mesa as follows:

1. The foregoing findings of fact and determinations are true and hereby made a part hereof.

2. The City Council approves the final map for La Mesa Tract 16-01 as shown on the final map.

Page 313 of 615 ends

Resolution No. 2022-xx

Page 2 ends

3. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and instructed to execute for and on behalf of the City the final map for La Mesa Tract 16-01.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 14th day of June, 2022, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2022- , duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited.

MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk
(SEAL OF CITY)

Page 314 of 615 ends

Page 315 of 615 ends

Page 316 of 615 ends

Quarry basin looking northeast.

Quarry basin looking northwest.

Project 2021‐35 High Street PRD
Aerial view of quarry basin.

Page 317 of 615 ends

Page 318 of 615 ends

RESOLUTION NO. PC-2017-18
RESOLUTION APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TTM 16-01, SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN DAB 16-13, VARIANCE V 16-03 AND SPECIAL PERMIT SP 16-10 (NTC DEVELOPMENT INC) FOR A 34-UNIT PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ON HIGH STREET IN THE R1S ZONE
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Mesa did hold a duly noticed public hearing on September 20, 2017, and accepted public testimony in considering a proposed Tentative Tract Map, Site Development Plan, Variance, and Special Permit to develop a 34-unit Planned Residential Development on a 8.51-acre site located on High Street, a private road;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did consider a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation, Monitoring and Reporting Program prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, and determined that the environmental assessment was adequate;
WHEREAS, Variance V 16-03 would allow a building setback to be reduced from 20 feet to 13 feet along the west property line;
WHEREAS, Special Permit SP 16-10 would allow for retaining walls with a fill height greater than three (3) feet within a front setback;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did receive and consider a staff report for the proposal;
WHEREAS, parcels in the vicinity of the subject property are developed with singlefamily and multi-family residences; WHEREAS, the project has been reviewed for consistency with the La Mesa General Plan and related zoning ordinances;
WHEREAS, the proposed subdivision will create building sites suitable for construction of residences which will help satisfy demand for needed housing in the City of La Mesa;
WHEREAS, the proposed project will not violate regional water quality requirements for waste discharge because any future development will be required to connect into the public sanitary sewer system, and the future development will be required to observe all City ordinance requirements during project construction; WHEREAS, all public facilities are in place and available to serve the proposed project for the life of the tentative tract map; and

Page 319 of 615 ends

Resolution PC-2017-18

Page 2 ends

WHEREAS, the proposed map does provide for future natural heating and cooling opportunities as required by the Subdivision Map Act, because the lots and the development on them will receive sunlight and natural breezes as configured.

THE PLANNING COMMISSION FINDS AND DETERMINES AS FOLLOWS:

Tentative Tract Map Findings:

1. Is the proposed map consistent with applicable general and specific plans? Yes. The project proposes development at a density of 4 dwelling units per acre, consistent with the Suburban Residential land use classification. General Plan Land Use policy LU-2.1.3 encourages single-family Planned Residential Developments (PRD) at densities similar to those found in single-family neighborhoods that meet the City’s development standards, including the provision of parking and open space amenities.

2. Is the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision consistent with the applicable general and specific plans?
Yes. A 34-unit condominium map complies with the general plan density limitation for the Suburban Residential land use classification. As conditioned, the project will be required to comply with safety requirements, including building and fire codes, accessibility standards, and crime prevention techniques, consistent with Policy LU-1.2.2. The General Plan supports infill development that reinforces neighborhood strengths, benefits neighborhood identity (Policy LU-2.1.2), and fits within the context of the neighborhood (Policy LU-2.2.2). The Design Review Board reviewed the project for consistency with the Urban Design Program, which includes neighborhood compatibility guidelines. The General Plan also cites the importance of providing adequate parking and circulation for new development (Policy LU3.1.4) and the project provides parking in compliance with City requirements.

3. Is the site physically suitable for the type of development? Yes. The site is surrounded by residential development and open space. The developable portion of the site is not steeply sloped and has frontage on a private street with access to the public right-of-way. All public utilities and services are available and sidewalks are in place. There are no physical constraints that would hinder construction of three-story residential condominiums as designed. The required maintenance covenants for on-site landscape, utility, and roadway will ensure that the developed project will be maintained over time.

4. Is the site physically suitable for the proposed density of development? Yes. The proposed density of 4 units per acre can be accommodated on the

Page 320 of 615 ends

Resolution PC-2017-18

Page 3 ends

site to include adequate parking, open space, and fire apparatus access. The site can accommodate these improvements without the need for large retaining walls or significant drainage alterations and has no known constraints that would prohibit the proposed density of development as allowed by the La Mesa General Plan. All utilities are present for connection to new units.

5. Would the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements be likely to cause substantial environmental damage or injure fish or wildlife in their habitat?
No. An Initial Study prepared in accordance with CEQA, supported by multiple biological surveys, concluded that the project would not have the potential to cause a significant environmental impact to fish or wildlife in their habitat. The project includes construction modifications, post-construction surveys, and CC&R provisions to minimize disturbances to bats and bat habitat. Coastal sage scrub on the site will be mitigated through the purchase of off-site conservation credits in accordance with the City’s Multiple Species Conservation Plan (MSCP) Subarea Plan.

6. Would the design of the subdivision or type of improvements be likely to cause serious health problems?
Development on the site would be required to be connected to the public sewer. No health problems are anticipated due to the design of the subdivision.

7. Would the design of the subdivision or type of improvements conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision?
The design of the proposed subdivision and improvements will not conflict with any existing or proposed easements. All appropriate utility providers have been requested to comment, and no conflicts have been identified with the proposed subdivision.

Planned Residential Development Findings:

1. That the height and bulk of the buildings does not detract from the established character of any neighborhood in which the planned residential development is proposed.

With its high cliff walls and isolated location, the quarry site poses a unique site condition. The proposed three-story buildings would only be visible from properties located at a significantly higher elevation to the north and properties located further downhill and across the rail/MTS trolley right-of-way. It is unlikely that either of those vantage points would be affected by the height and bulk of the buildings in the quarry basin. Clustering the development within the quarry basin ensures that the height and bulk of the buildings is situated in the

Page 321 of 615 ends

Resolution PC-2017-18

Page 4 ends

least visually prominent location possible. The DRB evaluated the project and concluded that the design as proposed is compatible with existing neighborhood character.

2. That the appearance of overcrowding is avoided through the careful placement of buildings on the site.

The appearance of overcrowding is avoided by creating driveways and parking areas around the buildings, by terracing the upper and lower three buildings, and by leaving all of the slopes as undeveloped open space.

3. That landscaping will be provided according to an approved landscape plan.

Landscaping will be provided in accordance with the conceptual landscape plan, which has been reviewed by the DRB. The landscape concept provides for common area landscaping. Landscaping and irrigation installation and ongoing maintenance is required as a condition of approval. Street trees will be provided in accordance with City standards.

4. That the proposed development/modification and its architecture meet the design objectives and development standards adopted by the City Council.

The Urban Design Program maintains that a variety of surface planes, forms, and textures be incorporated into each building and between buildings for visual interest. Good design also emphasizes architectural consistency (styles, colors, and materials) as well as neighborhood compatibility. The DRB determined that the proposed architecture, landscaping and common areas fit with the character of the area and are of high quality design.

5. That the proposed development/modification is consistent with the La Mesa General Plan and the development standards of the Zoning Ordinance, and serves to achieve the intended benefits of PRD development.

The La Mesa General Plan land use designation of the subject property is “Suburban Residential.” The land use designation is implemented by the R1S zone, which is designed for those areas affected by moderate to severe hillside conditions and to the fringe of such areas. It is intended that development conditions including structure locations will be variable in order to achieve maximum allowable density without adversely affecting the hillside environment. Minimum grading which leaves natural appearing land forms is required. With a density of 4 dwelling units per acre as assigned by the Suburban Residential land use classification, the project achieves the intent of the R1S zone by leaving the sloped areas undisturbed. Infill developments that are compatible and in context with surrounding land uses, and which improve the community’s character are consistent with the General Plan.

Page 322 of 615 ends

Resolution PC-2017-18

Page 5 ends

The intended benefits of a PRD include the attainment of an economical and efficient use of the land in exchange for a higher level of design. Given the constraints posed by the quarry site, including a sheer rock wall, habitat open space, and circular quarry basin, the project achieves the purpose of the PRD ordinance by preserving the natural features of the site.

6. That the site has not been substantially altered within 24 months prior to submittal of the project application to the planning department and prior to consideration of the project.

The site has not been graded or substantially altered within 24 months prior to the submittal of the project application.

Variance Findings:

1. That the strict application of the development standard(s) for which the variance is requested would deprive the building site of a development privilege enjoyed by other properties in the same zone and vicinity.

Yes, the neighborhood to the north of the subject property is zoned R1S, but was developed under R1 zoning standards that were in effect prior to the 1970s. The R1 setback requirements are less stringent than the R1S setbacks.

2. That there are special circumstances such as size, shape, topography, location or surroundings which affect the building site and cause the deprivation of development privilege.

Yes. The quarry walls and basin are a significant topographical feature that constrains the location of the development. The existing property line runs through the basin. There is no development on the adjacent site to the west, which is owned by Helix Water District, and the applicant is currently acquiring the remainder of the quarry basin from the adjacent owner.

3. That granting the variance would not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the same vicinity and zone.

No. Other setback exceptions granted on nearby sites include a reduced rear setback at 8155 Cinnabar Drive and a reduced side yard setback at 4175 West Arrieta Circle.

Special Permit Findings:

1. Will the location and characteristics of the proposed buildings and/or structures and the allowed use of them impact unfavorably upon adjacent properties?

Page 323 of 615 ends

Resolution PC-2017-18

Page 6 ends

No. The retaining wall is located behind the sidewalk, adjacent to the street and does not impact any nearby properties. There is no other development along High Street within one-quarter mile of the proposed wall. There are no views that would be obstructed by the walls and no conflicts related sight-distance visibility for traffic.

2. Is the project consistent with the design objectives established as policy of the City Council?
Yes. The Design Review Board reviewed the proposal and concluded that the project and related site improvements are consistent with the City’s Urban Design Program.

Mitigated Negative Declaration Finding:

That the project would not have an adverse impact on the environment due to mitigation measures which reduce potential impacts to below a level of significance.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LA MESA AS FOLLOWS:

1. The foregoing findings of fact and determinations are true and hereby made a part hereof.

2. The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the proposed Tentative Tract Map TTM 16-01, Site Development Plan DAB 16-13, Variance V 16- 03, and Special Permit SP 16-10, and adopt of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for a 34-unit planned residential development on High Street, subject to the conditions shown in Exhibit A and as shown in the attached Exhibit B, and subject to the following additional condition:

A. The CC&Rs shall stipulate that the HOA shall be responsible for maintaining and managing the entirety of the property, including the Diegan Coastal Sage Scrub areas and cliff walls above the quarry basin.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 20th day of September 2017, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES: Chair Newland, Commissioners Hottel, Kanavel, Podeswik, Tetlow and Torpey.

NOES: None.

ABSENT: Commissioner Alvey.

Page 324 of 615 ends

Resolution PC-2017-18

Page 7 ends

I, Allyson Kinnard, Deputy Secretary of the City of La Mesa Planning Commission, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and exact copy of Resolution PC-2017-18 duly passed and adopted by the Planning Commission.

Allyson Kinnard, Deputy Secretary
La Mesa Planning Commission
E:\cp2017\Resolutions\PC\pc-2017-18.doc

Page 325 of 615 ends

CERTIFICATION OF

DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY BOARD ACTION
FILE: DAB 16-13 (High Street 34, LP)
MEETING DATE: January 23, 2017
SUBJECT: Consideration of a site development plan for a proposed 34-unit residential condominium development on an 8.5-acre site on the north side of High Street in the R1S (Suburban Residential) zone.

DETERMINATION: After reviewing the various comments from the City departments, the Board duly made a motion to approve DAB 16-13, subject to the following conditions:

The approval process for this project consists of the following actions:

1. Planning Commission review and City Council ratification of:

Tentative Tract Map TTM 16-01, Site Development Plan DAB 16-13, Special Permit SP 16-10, Variance V 16-03, and environmental determination.

2. Design Review Board approval and City Council ratification of design review DRB 16-13. ________________________________________________________________________ A. The following conditions must be satisfied prior to recordation of the Final Map related to TTM 16-01:

1. The applicant shall submit a Final Map prepared by a Licensed Land Surveyor or Registered Civil Engineer authorized to practice land surveying. The Final Map shall be prepared in accordance with the approved Tentative Map, the Subdivision Map Act and La Mesa Development Code titled Major Subdivisions, Chapter 22.02.030, and shall be subject to approval by the Director of Community Development and the City Engineer.

2. The applicant shall get the final map signed by all individuals or parties with record title interest in the property.

3. The applicant shall provide an updated Title report, Subdivision Guarantee and Tax Clearance Certificate from the County of San Diego before the final map is released for recordation.

4. All easements of record shall be plotted on the Final Map. The applicant shall provide plat and legal descriptions to prepare any easement documents and lien agreements. The documents shall be recorded and recording information shall be shown on the Final Map.

5. The applicant shall quitclaim any existing easements in conflict with the proposed development.

EXHIBIT A

Page 326 of 615 ends

DAB 16-13 (High Street 34 LP) 2

6. The applicant shall grant an easement for the fire apparatus access fire lanes on the tentative tract map.

7. The applicant shall provide letters from the utility companies (SDG&E, AT&T, Cox Cable, Helix Water District, EDCO) for the availability of utilities and services for the proposed development and/or that the financial arrangements have been made to extend or install new services for the proposed development.

8. The applicant shall provide a monumentation bond for deferred monumentation. The engineer or land surveyor shall provide a letter stating the cost of monumentation.

9. The applicant shall make a cash deposit of $1,000 to be released after the applicant provides the City with a photo Mylar of the recorded map within thirty (30) days after its recordation. The City reserves the right to use the deposit to purchase a photo Mylar of the recorded map including a $100 administrative fee which will be charged against the deposit.

10. The applicant shall obtain easements as required from Helix Water District for access.

11. The applicant shall submit covenants or CC&R’s for review and approval by the Community Development Department, Engineering Division, and Fire Department. The covenants or CC&R’s shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map, and shall provide for the following:
a) The establishment of a homeowner’s association or similar mechanism for the joint use and maintenance, with equitable share of responsibility by all the property owners, of private common facilities throughout the project for the mutual benefit of the owners, including any common driveways and parking spaces, open space and common recreational facilities, common area lighting and fencing, utilities, on- and off-site drainage facilities, storm water pollution prevention facilities, Best Management Practices (BMPs), on-site sanitary sewer, landscaping & irrigation, fencing and walls, fire hydrants, and monument signage
b) Provision requiring a "Declaration of Covenant and Restrictions for Storm Water Pollution Prevention and Maintenance" for the maintenance of the private drainage system, and any storm water pollution prevention facilities, to include the following:
i. Storm Drain Facilities: The Owner(s) shall be responsible for operation and maintenance of the onsite storm drain, trench drains, inlet boxes, local area drains, drainage swales and water quality basins located on this property to ensure proper function and no adverse conditions are imposed on downstream properties; i.e. increased erosion, flooding, etc. ii. Paved surfaces: Shall be swept at a minimum frequency of once each month. Trash, heavy metals and sediments will be collected and properly disposed of. Inlets and grates shall be cleared of all obstructions to provide unobstructed flows. Silt deposit, rocks and leaves shall be removed.

Discharge of wash water from cleaning or hosing impervious surfaces is prohibited.

Page 327 of 615 ends

DAB 16-13 (High Street 34 LP) 3
iii. Landscaping: Shall be inspected on the first of October and April of every year at a minimum. Healthy growth shall be maintained. Dead plants are to be replaced. Irrigation systems shall operate properly. c) A minimum of 34 open parking spaces shall be reserved for guest parking within the common area.
d) The covered and garaged parking for each dwelling unit shall be maintained for the off-street parking of two vehicles at all times, and shall not be used for storage. e) Fuel modification plan requirements and maintenance, fire lane maintenance and fire protection system maintenance.

B. The following conditions related to Site Development Plan DAB 16-13 must be satisfied prior to the issuance of building and grading permits:

1. The applicant shall complete all conditions of the Tentative Tract Map, and a complete Final Map shall be submitted for review and approval and be recorded prior to issuance of any building or grading permits for new structures. All easements of record shall be plotted on the Final Map. A photo Mylar of the recorded subdivision map shall be provided.

2. The applicant’s engineer shall ensure that the design and construction of all improvements shall be in accordance with standard plans and specifications of the City of La Mesa, and subject to the approval of the City Engineer.

3. The applicant shall submit all plans and supporting documents concurrently for plan check and approval as required for all sewer, water, storm drain, street, and sidewalk improvements. Plans shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer. All street dedications, alignments, widths, and geometrics shall be as approved by the City Engineer.

4. A precise grading, drainage, erosion control and improvement plan shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer in accordance with the City of La Mesa Grading Ordinance Title

14.05 showing all buildings, access roads, parking, driveways, landscaping, and drainage.

The grading and erosion control plans shall be submitted for plan check and approval of the City Engineer and Planning Division prior to approval of the Grading and Building Permits.

5. Where off-site work or improvements are proposed to be constructed (including, but not limited to, slopes, public utility, and drainage facilities); the applicant shall obtain all necessary easements, letters of permission or other interest in real property, at their own expense and shall dedicate the same to the City as may be necessary.

6. Off-site improvements within High Street, beyond the parcel boundary may be required to be installed as determined by the City Engineer to provide proper transition to the street and sidewalk, and to address drainage or traffic and pedestrian safety.

7. Sight distance requirements at all street, common drive, and/or driveway intersections shall conform to the intersectional sight distance criteria provided in the California Department of Transportation (CalTrans) Highway Design Manual and section

24.05.030.N of the City of La Mesa Municipal Code and shall be shown in the plans.

Page 328 of 615 ends

DAB 16-13 (High Street 34 LP) 4

8. Fences, walls or cut banks running parallel with a driveway which exceed a height of thirtysix (36) inches shall not be permitted within a distance of five (5) feet from the property line at the street.

9. The method of disposing of surface water from the site shall be submitted and approved to assure that the site will drain to the street or to a natural watercourse. New drainage facilities, and private maintenance agreements or covenants may be required.

10. A hydrology report prepared by a registered Civil Engineer shall be furnished to establish the adequacy of the drainage system and the base flood elevation of the 100-year storm.

Report must support the design and sizing of any water quality BMPs to treat the 85th percentile storm in perpetuity.
a) Hydrologic and Hydraulic analyses shall be based on the County of San Diego Hydrology and Drainage Design Manuals, most current editions. b) Report must clearly address pre-development and post development offsite discharge, and erosion potential. Any post-development increases in offsite discharge, and erosion potential must be minimized, justified and mitigated to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

11. The applicant shall comply with Storm Water Pollution Control Ordinance (City of La Mesa Municipal Code Chapter 7.18) and the State’s current General NPDES Storm Water Permit. The applicant shall show evidence that a Notice of Intent (NOI) has been applied for and fees paid to the State Water Resources Control board prior to issuance of a grading permit. A Water Quality Technical Report (WQTR) and Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be provided and shall accompany the grading plan submittal.

12. This project shall comply with the City of La Mesa hydromodification management requirements. For more information please refer to the City of La Mesa website at http://www.cityoflamesa.com/stormwater, on the Development Requirements tab.

13. Prior to grading of any part of the project, a comprehensive soils and geologic investigation shall be conducted of the geologic formations, soils, and slopes of the site. A soils investigation report verifying that the site is suitable for the proposed development shall be prepared by a licensed civil or geotechnical engineer. All necessary measures shall be taken and implemented to ensure slope stability, erosion control, and soil integrity.

14. The applicant/developer shall provide adequate erosion control devices at the completion of each phase of grading. This shall include landscaping and temporary irrigation systems on exposed slopes. Such temporary measures shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer.

15. Site operations shall comply with City of La Mesa Municipal Code Chapter 7.18 Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Program. A completed City of La Mesa storm water management permit application shall accompany the grading plan submittal.

16. The development plan(s) shall clearly show compliance with the criteria of the City of La Mesa Storm Water Standards Manual for Priority Development Projects. Each component requiring maintenance shall be perpetually maintained by the property owner and located

Page 329 of 615 ends

DAB 16-13 (High Street 34 LP) 5
on private property. These include the following:
a) A post-construction Water Quality Technical Report and recorded maintenance agreement pursuant to Title 7.18 of the La Mesa Municipal Code shall be required.

Compliance requires post-development BMPs. Each (BMP) component requiring maintenance shall be, perpetually maintained by the property owner and located on the private property.
b) Creation of off-street parking in excess of the minimums set forth in the City Zoning ordinance shall utilize porous pavement alternatives. All parking areas shall drain to a dry well filter which filters runoff through sand and crushed rock or a cyclone type filter before infiltration.
c) Drain impermeable rooftops, sidewalks, walkways, and patios through adjacent landscaping or other pervious surfaces to maximize infiltration and provide vegetative filtration.

17. Post Construction BMPs
a) Tree box/modular wetlands are only allowed if bio-retention style IMPs are proved to be infeasible. Vault/Separator style units are not allowed. b) Each drainage management area that discharges into the public system outlet or street shall have storm water quality controls, and shall be maintained by the property owner and located on the private property.
c) A post-construction Water Quality Management Plan and recorded maintenance agreement pursuant to section 7.18 of the La Mesa Municipal Code shall be required. Perpetual maintenance requirements should be considered when selecting appropriate BMPs.
d) Trash enclosures shall be covered to prevent rainwater intrusion or otherwise designed to prevent offsite migration of contaminants.

18. Water improvements are separately approved by and bonded with the Helix Water District (HWD) prior to approval of the grading plan. Please submit with HWD concurrently to avoid project delays. HWD has provided the following project conditions in a letter dated July 18, 2016:
a) Each existing or new parcel shall have its own separate water service. b) Backflow device(s) are required for all proposed fire and water services and shall be installed per current Water Agencies’ Standards.
c) The new backflow devices shall be tested by a certified backflow tester with a copy of the passing test results forwarded to HWD, attention to Darrin Teisher by email:
[email protected].
d) All water laterals designated for the subject parcels that will not be used shall be abandoned by HWD at the property owner’s expense.

Page 330 of 615 ends

DAB 16-13 (High Street 34 LP) 6
e) This project may require a water main extension onsite from a water distribution system able to serve the property with the required pressures and water flows, and will therefore require improvement plans and appropriate fees, submitted to HWD for review, approval, and signature.
f) The location of the existing water facilities shall be brought up to current HWD standards.
g) Looping of the proposed water main and relocation of any existing facilities may be required, and will be determined upon review of the improvement plans. h) The project is subject to all HWD requirements, policies, practices, and standards at the time of establishing a work order and submittal of improvement plans to the district.
i) Any finished surface improvement, other than asphalt above the pipeline or underground facilities will require an encroachment removal agreement.

Permeable finished service improvements and bio-retention swales or basins are prohibited within the HWD easement or over water facilities. j) If landscaping of the parcels exceeds 5,000 square feet, a dedicated irrigation meter is required and the property entered into the HWD Water Conservation Program. Please contact the Program by email: [email protected]. k) Heartland Fire and Rescue may require additional or upgraded fire protection facilities. All costs for new fire protection facilities shall be paid for by the owner/developer.

19. The onsite sewer system, pump house and force main located in the private street, High Street, shall be privately owned and maintained up to the point where it discharges into the public system at MH# SI042.00. The developer and/or current owner shall enter into a Covenant for future Encroachment Removal and Maintenance with the City of La Mesa in the event that High Street ever becomes a public street. Prior to the City’s acceptance for the responsibility of High Street, the current or future owner shall enter into an Encroachment Removal and Maintenance Agreement to allow for the private facilities within the newly designated public street.

20. The applicant shall show the following information on the site plan and/or add a note to the plans:
a) The sanitary sewer main, sewer service lateral and property line clean out shall be identified. A clean out shall be installed if one does not exist.

21. The applicant shall pay the current Sanitary Sewer Connection Fee as determined by the City’s current fee structure.

22. The applicant shall obtain an Encroachment Permit and Traffic Control Permit prior to beginning any proposed work within the High Street private right of way. Traffic control plans for streets which will be opened to public travel during construction shall be in accordance with construction signing, marking and other protection as required by the State Department of Transportation (CalTrans) Traffic Manual.

Page 331 of 615 ends

DAB 16-13 (High Street 34 LP) 7

23. Prior to obtaining a Building Permit, the applicant shall pay the Regional Transportation Congestion Improvement Program (RTCIP) development impact fee, as determined by the City’s current fee structure, for each newly constructed residential unit.

24. Surety (security) for improvements and/or grading shall be posted with the City of La Mesa prior to improvement and/or grading permit approval to guarantee the construction of all the required street improvements, drainage, grading, erosion control, landscaping, irrigation, sewer and monumentation. The security shall include all onsite and offsite grading and improvements. The amount of security shall be determined by the City Engineer based upon an estimate furnished to the City taken from approved plans submitted by the engineer of work. The engineer’s cost estimate should include an estimate of utility relocation, if applicable.

25. The applicant shall pay “Parkland Dedication In-Lieu Fee”, according to Chapter 9.20, of the La Mesa Municipal Code. This "Parkland Dedication In-Lieu Fee", is in addition to the Park Improvement Impact Fee to be paid with the Building Permit Fees.

26. The applicant shall provide a letter from EDCO showing that trash and recycling service is available to serve each proposed residence. The applicant shall provide an area for the storage of trash receptacles outside the front setback area and outside of parking areas.

All trash shall be stored in weather-protected containers and screened from view. If a dumpster is proposed to serve common areas, it shall be enclosed to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director.

27. The applicant shall provide a letter from the US Postal Service approving the mailbox location. The letter shall state whether or not dedicated parking for mail delivery will be required. Guest parking shall not be reduced to meet a Postal Service parking requirement.

28. The applicant shall submit for review and approval landscape and irrigation plans in conformance with City standards and Municipal Code Chapter 14.29, Water Efficient Landscape Regulations.

29. The applicant shall prepare and submit plans in conformance with the approved exhibits and conditions of approval for DAB 16-13 and DRB 16-13. A note shall be placed on the building plans stating that prior to final inspection sign off and release of electrical service, the site and buildings shall be inspected for substantial conformance to the approved exhibits and conditions. The exact materials and colors of all proposed structures shall be prominently noted on all plans and exhibits.

30. A note shall be placed on the building plans stating that prior to any non-native removals within the Open Space area between 1 February and 31 August, a survey must be performed by a qualified biologist that documents that no actively nesting migratory birds would be affected. If active migratory bird nests are detected, an area 300 ft. from the nest shall be staked and posted to prohibit all clearing, grubbing, and construction work within the perimeter until the qualified biologist determines that the nests are no longer occupied with written notification to the approval of the Community Development Director.

31. Plans must be complete and sealed by a licensed professional before the Building Division will accept them into the plan review and permitting process.

Page 332 of 615 ends

DAB 16-13 (High Street 34 LP) 8

32. Plans shall show compliance with all applicable accessible regulations as contained in Title 24, California Building Code.

33. Building and grading permits for the development of the project shall be issued concurrently.

34. A completed Building Location Verification, prepared by a registered civil engineer or land surveyor, must be submitted to the Building Division prior to the foundation inspection of each building and any site retaining walls.

35. The proposed buildings must comply with Section705.3, 2013 California Building Code “Buildings on the same lot.” The building exterior walls and openings must have the required fire-resistive protection based on imaginary property lines.

36. All applicable school facilities fees, as determined by the school districts, shall be paid prior to permit issuance.

37. The project must comply with City’s Construction and Demolition Ordinance regulating recycling of construction materials.

38. Heartland Fire & Rescue at time of plan submission will charge certain fees for plan review and inspections. Fees will be determined at the time of plan submittal.

39. The project shall comply with the most recently adopted California Building Code, California Residential Code and the California Fire Code as well as other adopted codes and standards applicable to the project.

C. The following conditions must be satisfied prior to start of construction:

1. The fire apparatus access roads shall be a minimum of 26 feet wide unobstructed to a minimum height of 13 feet 6 inches and within 150 feet of all portions of the building. Fire apparatus access roadways must be maintained unobstructed and drivable throughout the construction phase and capable of holding the imposed loads of fire apparatus at 75,000 pounds.

2. Fire apparatus access roadways shall be paved, accessible and fire hydrant(s) shall be capable of flowing the required 1,500 gallons per minute at 20 PSI for two hours.

3. The existing water system capable of providing the required fire flow is deficient. Public water improvement plans shall be submitted and approved by Heartland Fire & rescue prior to construction. Private on-site water mains to serve fire protection system must also be submitted under a separate review and approval from the public improvements.

4. Roadway design features (speed bumps, humps, speed control dips, etc.) which may interfere or delay emergency apparatus response shall not be installed or allowed to remain on or across a fire apparatus access roadway.

5. Any gate or barrier across a fire apparatus access roadway, whether manual or automatic, must meet the requirements of Heartland Fire & Rescue and have specific plans and specifications submitted for review, approval and permits.

Page 333 of 615 ends

DAB 16-13 (High Street 34 LP) 9

6. Prior to combustibles being brought to the site, the developer shall provide written certification from Helix Water District that all public fire hydrants required of the project have been installed, tested, approved and in service by Helix Water District.

7. The requirements of the fuel modification plan submitted and approved by Charles Weber, Fire and Life Safety Consultant, must be in place and maintained prior to construction.

8. The fuel modification plan requirements along the west property line currently on Helix Water District property must be in place if and when the property is acquired by the developer.

D. The following conditions must be satisfied prior to the issuance of the Final occupancy permit for the first dwelling unit to be constructed:

1. The applicant is required to perform CCTV inspection of the sewer between Manholes SI042.00 and SI038.00 (per City Sewer Map Index E-06) and provide a condition and capacity analysis report. The City Engineer will determine if the main has to be replaced or rehabilitated based on the analysis. Manholes shall be upgraded to meet Regional Std.

Dwg. SM-01/02, if it is determined that the existing condition warrants the upgrade.

2. The applicant shall remove and replace existing curb and sidewalk if it is found to be cracked, broken or displaced. The city Inspector will identify the limits of removal and replacement.

3. All street and drainage improvements shall be completed and accepted by the engineering inspector prior to occupancy.

4. The applicant shall construct the project in substantial conformance to the approved exhibits and conditions set forth herein. The project shall utilize the architectural styles and materials as shown in Exhibit A approved by the City for this project.

5. The applicant shall install landscaping and irrigation for each unit as shown on Exhibit A.

6. All required fire lanes, fire lane markings and signage shall be provided, installed and approved by the Fire Code Official.

7. Prior to occupancy an automatic fire sprinkler system complying with NFPA 13R shall be provided. Three sets of plans, specifications and hydraulics shall be submitted for review, approval and permits prior to commencing work.

8. Prior to occupancy an automatic fire alarm system complying with NFPA 72 and the California Fire Code shall be provided. Three sets of plans, specifications and hydraulics shall be submitted for review, approval and permits prior to commencing work.

9. Permanent multi-family three dimensional street numbers, minimum of eight inches in height, installed on contrasting backgrounds, and shall be provided on the address side of each building as directed by the Fire Code Official. Addresses shall be installed on contrasting backgrounds.

10. A lighted directory (site map) meeting Heartland Fire & rescue specifications is required at each entrance to the complex as directed by the Fire Code Official. A directory plan shall

Page 334 of 615 ends

DAB 16-13 (High Street 34 LP) 10
be submitted for review and approval by Heartland Fire & rescue prior to installation.

11. Knox box access is required for each building. Knox boxes shall be ordered and installed at the direction of the Fire Code Official. Premise keys for all buildings and areas shall be marked and placed in the box prior to occupancy. The building owner/occupants shall provide replacement keys whenever locks are changed.

12. Provide the site plan in AutoCAD format acceptable to Heartland Fire rescue for pre-fire planning purposes. The site plan shall be submitted for review and approval with specific pre-fire planning elements as required by the Fire Code Official.

13. Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) emphasizes the proper design and effective use of a created environment to reduce crime and enhance the quality of life.

The applicant shall consider incorporating the following CPTED measures into the development:
a) Use deadbolts with one inch throw on the front door. b) Install secondary locks on sliding glass doors and windows. c) Front doors should have a wide angled peep hole.
d) Allow unit porch lights to be controlled by the property owner. Dawn to Dusk. e) Lighting:
i. The property should be well-lit at night to prevent loitering and eliminate hiding places. Lighting should be consistent to reduce contrast between shadows and illuminated areas. Floodlights installed under eaves can illuminate these areas.
ii. Install wire cages or industrial strength shatter resistant lenses over lights within reach of pedestrians.
iii. Building lighting should:
Illuminate building numbers
Illuminate building accesses
Illuminate front and back areas
Illuminate porch lights under control of building
Illuminate the corners as well as walls.
f) Parking areas should be well lit. Uniformity is highly recommended. g) Trash enclosures and dumpsters.
i. Dumpsters should have locked lids with an open space through which material can be put in but not taken out. This is to prevent scavenging.

E. The following conditions must be satisfied prior to the acceptance of improvements and filing of the Notice of Completion.

1. The applicant shall install street trees according to the approved landscaping plan.

Page 335 of 615 ends

DAB 16-13 (High Street 34 LP) 11

2. Landscaping for trees, shrubs, walls, fences, cut/fill slopes or other structures at or near driveway and street intersections shall conform to the intersectional sight distance criteria as provided by the California Department of Transportation (CalTrans) Highway Design Manual. Any obstructions which exceed a height of thirty-six (36) inches shall not be permitted within a distance of five (5) feet from the property line at the street.

3. Certification of the as-built elevations of the structures shall be furnished to the City Engineer prior to release of bonds.

4. The exact limits of pavement and sidewalks shall be approved by the City Engineer.

Street structural sections shall have a gravel equivalent of a minimum of 4” AC over 8” CL2AB with a T.I. of 6.0. Geotechnical tests of the existing pavement are subject to approval of the City Engineer in the field during project inspection. Existing High Street improvements will be repaired to good condition and proper alignment, as may be required for proper tie-in.

5. The applicant shall complete grading in one operation. All Best Management Practices (BMPs) and improvements shown on grading and site development plans shall be installed.

6. The developer, contractor or landscape architect shall provide a letter to the Community Development Department stating that all landscaping, irrigation, drainage, and hardscape was installed according to City standards. A Certificate of Completion for landscape improvements shall be submitted, along with an irrigation schedule and soils management report as required by Municipal Code Chapter 14.29, Water Efficient Landscape Regulations.

The vote on the motion was as follows:

AYES: Dick, Jacobs, Jensen, Marquardt, Ortega, Sturm.

NOES: None.

ABSENT: None.

ABSTAIN: None.

ATTEST:

Allyson Kinnard
Associate Planner
E:\cp2017\Resolutions\DAB\TTM-16-01 & DAB-16-13.doc

Page 336 of 615 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2017 - 104

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA MESA RATIFYING

THE PLANNING COMMISSION' S APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TTM 16 -01 AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN DAB 16 -13, AND THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD' S APPROVAL OF DESIGN REVIEW DRB 16 -13 ( NTC DEVELOPMENT, INC) FOR A 34 -UNIT PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ON AN 8.5 -ACRE SITE ON THE NORTH SIDE OF HIGH STREET, A PRIVATE ROAD, IN THE R1S ZONE
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a duly noticed public hearing, received and considered a staff report, accepted public testimony, and reviewed Tentative Tract Map TTM 16 -01, Site Development Plan DAB 16 -13, Variance V 16 -03, and Special Permit SP 16 -10, a proposal to develop 34 residential condominiums on an 8. 5 -acre former rock quarry site located on the north side of High Street, a private road;
WHEREAS, the proposed subdivision will create building sites suitable for construction of residences which will help satisfy demand for needed housing in the City of La Mesa; WHEREAS, the proposed project will not violate regional water quality requirements for waste discharge because any future development will be required to connect into the public sanitary sewer system, and the future development will be required to observe all City ordinance requirements during project construction;
WHEREAS, all public facilities are in place and available to serve the proposed project for the life of the tentative tract map;
WHEREAS, the proposed map does provide for future natural heating and cooling opportunities as required by the Subdivision Map Act, because the lots and the development on them will receive sunlight and natural breezes as configured; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission adopted resolution PC 2017 -08 approving the project on September 20, 2017;
WHEREAS, the Design Review Board ( DRB) considered the proposed development for consistency with the Urban Design Program and issued a Certification of Action recommending approval of the project on January 23, 2017;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission and City Council did consider a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA) and determined that the environmental assessment was adequate; and
WHEREAS, the City Council did receive and consider a staff report on the proposal.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of La Mesa finds and determines as follows:

Page 337 of 615 ends

Tentative Tract Map findings:

The proposed map is consistent with the City of La Mesa General Plan. The proposed development density of 4 dwelling units per acre is consistent with the Suburban Residential land use classification. General Plan Land Use policy LU -2. 1. 3 encourages single - family Planned Residential Developments (PRD) at densities similar to those found in single - family neighborhoods that meet the City' s development standards, including the provision of parking and open space amenities.

2. The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the La Mesa General Plan. A 34 -unit condominium map complies with the general plan density limitation for the Suburban Residential land use classification. As conditioned, the project will be required to comply with safety requirements, including building and fire codes, accessibility standards, and crime prevention techniques, consistent with Policy LU- 1. 2. 2. The General Plan supports infill development that reinforces neighborhood strengths, benefits neighborhood identity ( Policy LU- 2. 1. 2), and fits within the context of the neighborhood Policy LU- 2. 2. 2). The DRB reviewed the project for consistency with the Urban Design Program, which includes neighborhood compatibility guidelines. The General Plan also cites the importance of providing adequate parking and circulation for new development ( Policy LU- 3. 1. 4) and the project provides parking in compliance with City requirements.

3. That the site is physically suitable for the type of development because it is surrounded by residential development and open space. The developable portion of the site is not steeply sloped and has frontage on a private street with access to the public right -of -way. All public utilities and services are available and sidewalks are in place. There are no physical constraints that would hinder construction of three -story residential condominiums as designed. The required maintenance covenants for on -site landscape, utility, and roadway will ensure that the developed project will be maintained over time.

4. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development of 4 units per acre, which can be accommodated on the site to include adequate parking, open space, and fire apparatus access. The site can accommodate these improvements without the need for large retaining walls or significant drainage alterations and has no known constraints that would prohibit the proposed density of development as allowed by the La Mesa General Plan. All utilities are present for connection to new units.

5. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or not likely to injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. An Initial Study prepared in accordance with CEQA, supported by multiple biological surveys, concluded that the project would not have the potential to cause a significant environmental impact to fish or wildlife in their habitat. The project includes construction modifications, post - construction surveys, and CC &R provisions to minimize disturbances to bats and bat habitat.

Coastal sage scrub on the site will be mitigated through the purchase of off -site conservation credits in accordance with the City' s Multiple Species Conservation Plan ( MSCP) Subarea Plan.

6. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems. Development on the site will be required to be connected to the public sewer. No health problems are anticipated due to the design of the subdivision.

7. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with

Page 338 of 615 ends

easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. All appropriate utility providers have been requested to comment, and no conflicts have been identified.

Planned Residential Development findings:

1. The height and bulk of the buildings does not detract from the established character of any neighborhood in which the planned residential development is proposed. With its high cliff walls and isolated location, the quarry site poses a unique site condition. The proposed three -story buildings would only be visible from properties located at a significantly higher elevation to the north and properties located further downhill and across the rail /MTS trolley right -of -way. It is unlikely that either of those vantage points would be affected by the height and bulk of the buildings in the quarry basin. Clustering the development within the quarry basin ensures that the height and bulk of the buildings is situated in the least visually prominent location possible. The DRB evaluated the project and concluded that the design as proposed is compatible with existing neighborhood character.

2. The appearance of overcrowding is avoided through the careful placement of buildings on the site. The appearance of overcrowding is avoided by creating driveways and parking areas around the buildings, by terracing the upper and lower three buildings, and by leaving all of the slopes as undeveloped open space.

3. Landscaping will be provided according to an approved landscape plan that has been reviewed by the DRB. The landscape concept provides for common area landscaping.

Landscaping and irrigation installation and ongoing maintenance is required as a condition of approval. Street trees will be provided in accordance with City standards.

4. The proposed development and its architecture meet the design objectives and development standards adopted by the City Council, The Urban Design Program maintains that a variety of surface planes, forms, and textures be incorporated into each building and between buildings for visual interest. Good design also emphasizes architectural consistency ( styles, colors, and materials) as well as neighborhood compatibility. The DRB determined that the proposed architecture, landscaping and common areas fit with the character of the area and are of high quality design.

5. The proposed development is consistent with the La Mesa General Plan and the development standards of the Zoning Ordinance, and serves to achieve the intended benefits of PRD development. The La Mesa General Plan land use designation of the subject property is "Suburban Residential." The land use designation is implemented by the R1 S zone, which is designed for those areas affected by moderate to severe hillside conditions and to the fringe of such areas. It is intended that development conditions including structure locations will be variable in order to achieve maximum allowable density without adversely affecting the hillside environment. Minimum grading which leaves natural appearing land forms is required. With a density of 4 dwelling units per acre as assigned by the Suburban Residential land use classification, the project achieves the intent of the R1 S zone by leaving the sloped areas undisturbed. Infill developments that are compatible and in context with surrounding land uses, and which improve the community's character are consistent with the General Plan. The intended benefits of a PRD include the attainment of an economical and efficient use of the land in exchange for a higher level of design.

Given the constraints posed by the quarry site, including a sheer rock wall, habitat

Page 339 of 615 ends

open space, and circular quarry basin, the project achieves the purpose of the PRD ordinance by preserving the natural features of the site.

6. The site has not been substantially altered within 24 months prior to submittal of the project application to the planning department and prior to consideration of the project.

Urban Design Program finding:

The project is consistent with the goals and policies of the Urban Design Program.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Mesa as follows:

The foregoing findings of fact and determinations are true and hereby made a part hereof.

2. The City Council ratifies Tentative Tract Map TTM - 16 -01 and Site Development Plan DAB - 16- 13; subject to the conditions set forth in Planning Commission Resolution PC 2017 - 18.

3. The City Council ratifies Design Review DRB -16 -13 subject to conditions set forth in the Design Review Board Certification of Action dated January 23, 2017, PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 24th day of October, 2017, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES: Councilmembers Baber, McWhirter, Parent and Mayor Arapostathis NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: Vice Mayor Alessio

CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, MEGAN WIEGELMAN, City Clerk of the City of La Mesa, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and exact copy of Resolution No. 2017 -104, duly passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the date and by the vote therein recited.

MEGAN WIEGELMAN, CMC, City Clerk

SEAL OF CITY)

Page 340 of 615 ends

Figure 3b

Page 341 of 615 ends

Page 342 of 615 ends

RESOLUTION NO. DAB-2019-02

RESOLUTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY BOARD OF THE CITY OF LA MESA APPROVING SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN DAB 18-10 (NTC DEVELOPMENT

INC) - A REQUEST TO INCORPORATE AFFORDABLE HOUSING INTO AN APPROVED 34-UNIT PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ON HIGH STREET IN THE R1S ZONE
_________________________________________________________________ WHEREAS, on September 20, 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of La Mesa did hold a duly noticed public hearing, consider, and adopt Tentative Tract Map TTM 16-01, Site Development Plan DAB 16-13, Variance V 16-03, and Special Permit SP 16-10, a proposal to develop a 34-unit Planned Residential Development on an 8.51-acre site located on High Street, a private road in the R1S (Suburban Residential) zone;
WHEREAS, on October 24, 2017, the City Council of the City of La Mesa ratified the Planning Commission’s approval of the project and adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines;
WHEREAS, the applicant desires to provide affordable housing in accordance with the City’s Affordable Homes Bonus Program and Section 65915 of the California Government Code; WHEREAS, the applicant is seeking to apply parking ratios set forth in Section 65915; WHEREAS, an Addendum to the previously adopted Mitigation Negative Declaration has been prepared for Site Development Plan DAB 18-01; and
WHEREAS, the Development Advisory Board did receive and consider a staff report and public input on the proposal.

THE DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY BOARD FINDS AND DETERMINES AS FOLLOWS:

1. That the project is consistent with Title 24 of the La Mesa Municipal Code and Government Code Section 65915.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY BOARD OF THE CITY OF LA MESA AS FOLLOWS:

1. The foregoing findings of fact and determinations are true and hereby made a part hereof.

2. The foregoing findings of fact and determinations are supported by the staff report, plans, and exhibits, all of which are herein incorporated by reference.

3. The Development Advisory Board considered the Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration and determined that only minor technical changes are necessary and none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent negative declaration have occurred.

Page 343 of 615 ends

Resolution No. DAB-2019-02 January 14, 2019

Page 2 ends

4. The Development Advisory Board approves Site Development Plan DAB 18-10, subject to the conditions in Exhibit A.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Development Advisory Board of the City of La Mesa, California, held the 14th day of January, 2019, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES: Kusiak, Leja, Manns, and Sturm.

NOES: None.

ABSENT: None.

I, Allyson Kinnard, Deputy Secretary of the City of La Mesa Development Advisory Board, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and exact copy of Resolution DAB-2019-02, duly passed and adopted by the Development Advisory Board.
__________________________________
Allyson Kinnard, Deputy Secretary
Development Advisory Board
E:\cp2019\Resolutions\DAB\Reso DAB-2019-02 DAB 18-10.doc

Page 344 of 615 ends

Resolution No. DAB-2019-02 January 14, 2019

Page 3 ends

Exhibit A
DAB Resolution DAB-2019-02
Site Development Plan DAB 18-10
Conditions of Approval
The project is conditionally approved as set forth on the application, Cover sheet TS-001, Site plan, grading plan, floor plans numbered Sheets 30 through 36, and Affordable Homes Bonus Program Report stamped received by the City on December 6, 2018, designated as approved by the Development Advisory Board on January 14, 2019, and shall not be altered without express authorization by the Community Development Department.

These conditions of approval supplement the previously adopted conditions of approval for the Cantera Lofts project set forth in Planning Commission Resolution PC 2017-18, which shall remain in full force and effect except as modified herein.

A. The following conditions shall be satisfied prior to issuance of building permits:

1. In lieu of looping the underground water supply for the fire suppression systems, the applicant shall comply with the following requirements in addition to the conditions previously provided by the Fire Department during review of Tentative Tract Map TTM 16-01:
a. An additional fire hydrant shall be installed on the low pressure water line which currently runs the length of High Street and is a redundant source of water supply (looped system). The hydrant may be installed on either side of the street. b. The underground pipe for the other two proposed fire hydrants (on the high pressure water line) shall be a minimum size of 12 inches.

2. The Owner(s) shall waive any claims of liability against the City and indemnify, hold harmless and defend the City and City's employees regarding any component of the City’s approval, and shall execute an indemnity agreement in substantially the form as provided by the Community Development Department prior to building permit issuance, initiating use in reliance of this permit, and the Community Development Director is hereby authorized to execute the same.

3. The applicant shall enter into an affordable housing agreement with the City to guarantee the affordability of four (4) affordable units to moderate-income tenants for a minimum of 55 years. The affordable housing agreement shall identify the type, size, and location of the affordable units, and shall specify phasing of the affordable units in relation to the market-rate units. The executed affordable housing agreement shall be recorded prior to issuance of building permits.

4. Building permits shall not be issued for more than 50% of the market rate units until permits are issued for the affordable units.

5. Affordable units shall be comparable in exterior appearance and overall quality of construction to market-rate units in the same development. Interior finishes and amenities may differ from those provided in the market rate units, but neither the workmanship nor products may be of substandard or inferior quality as determined by the City.

6. The number of bedrooms of the affordable units shall at least equal the minimum number of bedrooms of the market rate units.

Page 345 of 615 ends

Page 346 of 615 ends

Page 347 of 615 ends

Page 348 of 615 ends

Page 349 of 615 ends

Page 350 of 615 ends

Drawn by
Reviewed by
1 D Project number
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:MEP:STRUCTURAL ENGINEER:Developer:

N.T.C. Development Inc.1380 El Cajon BLVD. Ste. 202El Cajon, CA 92020Phone: 619.593.2600 InDev + Design, INC © 2021 All Rights Reserved
Architect:

InDev+Design, Inc.2120 Columbia St.Suite 17 San Diego, CA 92101Phone: 858.231.9914 PROJECT ADDRESS:
8043 HIGH St.LA MESA, CA 91941

REVISIONS
Submittal DatePlan Date
TBD
DEC 2021
PROJECT STATUS:

CIVIL ENGINEER:VDLA Landscape Architects462 Stevens Ave. Suite 107 Solana Beach CA 92075Phone: 619.294.8484PLSA1911 San Diego Ave. Suite 100San Diego CA 92110Phone: 858.259.8212 CBA
2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
PROJECT NAME:

AJB

ZS / CG

CANTERA-KISHOUSE
PROJECT # B19-319-324
TS-001
5/4/2022 1:59:41 PM COVER SHEET

CANTERA

GENERAL NOTES DRAWING INDEX PROJECT RENDERING

1. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS.2. IT IS THE INTENT OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS THAT ALL WORK COMPLY w/ THE CALIFORNIA STATE BUILDING CODE, THE CALIFORNIA STATE ENERGY CODE & OTHERAPPLICABLE CODES, RULES & REGULATIONS OF JURISDICTIONS HAVING AUTHORITY.

3. ALL PROJECTS MUST COMPLY WITH CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE AMENDMENT SECTION 913 WATER CONSERVATION REQUIREMENTS & CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE REQ. FORBACKFLOW PROTECTION.

4. PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ANY PORTION OF THE WORK, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL

NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPENCIES NOTED AMONG OR BETWEEN THECONTRACT DOCUMENTS, OWNER PROVIDED INFORMATION, SITE CONDITIONS,MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS, OR CODE REGULATIONS, OR RULES OFJURISDICTIONS HAVING AUTHORITY

5. PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ANY PORTION OF THE WORK, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, OWNER PROVIDED INFORMATIONAND SITE CONDITIONS, INCLUDING TAKING FIELD MEASUREMENTS AS NECCESSARY.

6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PAY AND SECURE & ALL GOVERNMENTAL PERMITS, FEES, LICENCES, AND INSPECTION NECCESSARY FOR PROPER EXECUTION AND COMPLETION OFTHE WORK EXCEPT FOR THE GENERAL BUILDING PERMIT.

7. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF STUD, FACE OR MASONRY, FACE OF CONCRETE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. CONTACT ARCHITECT FOR CLARIFICATIONS IF NEEDED.

8. OPENINGS IN WALLS ARE R.O. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED OR DIMENSIONED.9. PROVIDE BLOCKING IN WALLS FOR ALL CASEWORK, FIXTURES AND ACCESSORIES.

10. NOTICE TO THE APPLICANT/ OWNER/ OWNER'S AGENT/ ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER OF RECORD: BY USING THESE PERMITTED CONSTUCTION DRAWINGS FOR CONSTUCTION ORTHE WORK SPECIFIED HEREIN, YOU ACKNOWLEDGE AND ARE AWARE OF THE REQ.CONTAINED IN THE STATEMENT OF SPECIAL INSPECTIONS. YOU AGREE TO COMPLY WITHTHE REQ. OF CITY OF LA MESA FOR SPECIAL INSPECTIONS, STRUCTURAL OBSERVATIONS,CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS TESTING AND OFF-SITE FABRICATION OF BUILDINGCOMPONENTS CONTAINED IN THE STATEMENT OF SPECIAL INSPECTIONS AND AS REQ. BYTHE CALIFORNIA CONSTRUCTION CODES. 11 COMPLETE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ALL FIRE EXTINGUISHING SYSTEMS, INCLUDING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER AND STANDPIPE SYSTEMS AND OTHER SPECIAL FIREEXTINGUISHING SYSTEMS AND RELATED APPURTENANCES SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THECITY OF LA MESA FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 12 COMPLETE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF LA MESA DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIORTO INSTALLATION. CFC 907.1.1 13 PRIOR TO ANY NON-NATIVE REMOVALS WITHIN THE OPEN SPACE AREA BETWEEN FEBRUARY 1ST TO AUGUST 31ST, A SURVEY MUST BE PERFORMED BY A QUALIFIEDBIOLOGIST THAT DOCUMENTS THE NO ACTIVELY NESTING MIGRATORY BIRDS WOULD BEAFFECTED. IF ACTIVE MIGRATORY BIRD NESTS ARE DETECTED, AN AREA OF 300 FEETFROM THE NEST SHALL BE STAKED AND POSTED TO PROHIBIT ALL CLEARING, GRUBBING,AND CONSTRUCTION WORK WITHIN THE PERIMETER UNTIL THE QUALIFIED BIOLOGISTDETERMINES THAT THE NESTS ARE NO LONGER OCCUPIED WITH WRITTEN NOTIFICATIONTO THE APPROVAL OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR 14 THE APPLICANT SHALL PREPARE AND SUBMIT PLANS IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE APPROVED EXHIBITS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR DAB 16-13 AND DRB 16-13.PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION SIGN OFF AND RELEASE OF ELECTRICAL SERVICE, THE SITEAND BUILDINGS SHALL BE INSPECTED FOR SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE TO THEAPPROVED EXHIBITS AND CONDITIONS. THE EXACT MATERIALS AND COLORS OF ALLPROPOSED STRUCTURES SHALL BE PROMINENTLY NOTED ON ALL PLANS AND EXHIBITS. 15 PRIOR TO ANY NON-NATIVE REMOVALS WITHIN THE OPEN SPACE AREA BETWEEN 1 FEBRUARY AND 31 AUGUST, A SURVEY MUST BE PERFORMED BY A QUALIFIED BIOLOGISTTHAT DOCUMENTS THAT NO ACTIVELY NESTING MIGRATORY BIRDS WOULD BE AFFECTED.LF ACTIVE MIGRATORY BIRD NESTS ARE DETECTED, AN AREA 300 FT. FROM THE NESTSHALL BE STAKED AND POSTED TO PROHIBIT ALL CLEARING, GRUBBING, ANDCONSTRUCTION WORK WITHIN THE PERIMETER UNTIL THE QUALIFIED BIOLOGISTDETERMINE THAT THE NESTS ARE NO LONGER OCCUPIED WITH WRITTEN NOTIFICATIONTO THE APPROVAL OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR. 16 CONTRACTORS SHALL COMPLY WITH CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION DEBRIS RECYCLING ORDINANCE NR 2763 PER LA MESA MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 14.27, WHICHREQUIRES 75 PERCENT OF DEBRIS TO BE RECYCLED. LMMC 14.27.060. 17 THIS PROJECT SHALL COMPLY WITH CITY OF LA MESA SECURITY ORDINANCE NR 2145 PER LA MESA MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 14.07.
18 PRIOR TO REQUESTING ANY INSPECTION RELATED TO FOUNDATION PLACEMENT, PROCESSING FOR BUILDING LOCATION VERIFICATION SURVEY FORM MUST BECOMPLETED. THE BUILDING LOCATION VERIFICATION SURVEY FORM IS REQUIRED TO BECOMPLETED, STAMPED AND SIGNED BY CALIFORNIA REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER ORLAND SURVEYOR 19 THE COMPLETED STAMPED AND SIGNED BUILDING LOCATION VERIFICATION SURVEY FORM MUST BE SIGNED BY CITY INSPECTORS AND RETURNED TO BUILDING DIVISIONPRIOR TO REQUESTING A FOUNDATION INSPECTION. 20 EES INSTALLATION CERTIFICATES MUST BE COMPLETED, SIGNED, ASSEMBLED AND POSTED WEATHER-PROTECTED WITHIN BUILDING FOR REVIEW BY INSPECTORS. EES10-103(A)3, 10-103(B)L.A. 21 ALL JOINTS, PENETRATIONS AND OTHER OPENINGS IN EXTERIOR WALLS, FLOOR-CEILINGS AND ROOF/CEILINGS THAT ARE POTENTIAL SOURCES OF AIR LEAKAGE MUST BE CAULKED,GASKETED, WEATHER STRIPPED OR OTHERWISE SEALED. EES 110.7. 22 PROJECT MUST HAVE ADDRESS PLAINLY LEGIBLE AND VISIBLE FROM STREET FRONTING SUBJECT PROPERTY. CBC 501.2.
23 ACOUSTICAL ANALYSIS DOCUMENTING COMPLIANT INTERIOR SOUND LEVELS MUST BE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW BY CITY BUILDING DIVISION PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION. CGBSC5.507.4.2.2.

DEFERRED SUBMITTALS

1. FIRE SPRINKLERS, FIRE ALARM, AND UNDERGROUND FIRE SERVICE SHALL BE A

DEFERRED SUBMITTAL

2. STRUCTURE SHALL HAVE AN AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLERS SYSTEM INSTALLED PER NFPA 13 STANDARDS AND PER THE CITY OF LA MESA STANDARDS

3. FIRE SPRINKLERS PLANS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED BY THE CITY OF LA MESA PRIOR TO FRAMING INSPECTION. THIS SHALL HAPPEN NO LATER THAN 30 DAYSAFTER ISSUANCE.

4. PLANS FOR THE DEFERRED SUBMITTAL ITEMS SHALL BE SUBMITTED IN A TIMELY MANNER THAT ALLOWS A MINIMUM OF 30 WORKING DAYS FOR INITIAL PLAN REVIEW. ALLCOMMENTS RELATED TO THE DEFERRED SUBMITTAL MUST BE ADDRESSED TO THESATISFATION OF THE PLAN CHECK DEVISION PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE SUBMITTALITEMS. 5 IT IS UNDERSTOOD THAT PLANS FOR THE PROJECT HAVE, AT THIS TIME, BEEN REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE STATE AND CITY REGULATION, AND THAT THEPROJECT AS A WHOLE HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE CITY, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THEDEFERRED ITEMS LISTED. 6 I/WE UNDERSTAND THAT I/WE WILL NOT BE AUTHORIZED ANY INSPECTION OF THE DEFERRED ITEMS PROPOSED PRIOR TO THE SUBMITTAL AND APPROVAL OF PLANSAND/OR CALCULATIONS FOR THOSE DEFERRED ITEMS.

PROJECT NAME

CANTERA
8043 HIGH St. LA MESA, CA 91941

CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT SET
SOILS

1. SEE REPORTS AND FAULT INVESTIGATION
REPORT #: CWE 2150445.01 DATE: 10/07/2015SIGNATURE_________________ OWNER

ACCOUNT INFO
PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR N.T.C. DEVELOPMENT INC.

WATER AND SEWER FEES: 1380 EL CAJON BLVD. STE 220
EL CAJON, CA 92202
619.593.2600
PROPERTY OWNER:

HIGH STREET 34 LP1380 EL CAJON BLVD STE 202. EL CAJON, CA 92202PHONE: 619.593.2600 LEGAL DESCRIPTION:

APN #:499-010-02-00 & 449.010.03.00PORTION OF LOT 12 OF EX MISSION RANCHO OF SAN DIEGO. ACCORDING TO THEPARTITION MAP THEREOF MADE IN ACTION ENTITLED "JUAN M LUCO, ET AL VERSUS THE COMMERCIAL BANK OF SAN DIEGO, ET AL". S.C.C. NO 348 ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THECOUNTY CLERK OF SAN DIEGO. AND DEPICTED ON LICENSED SURVEY MAP NO 184 FILEDIN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, IN THE CITY OF LA MESA, COUNTY OFD SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITY, STATE, NATIONAL APPLICABLE CODES:
2019 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE (CBC)2019 CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE (CRC)2019 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE (CPC)2019 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE (CMC)2019 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE (CFC)2019 NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE (NEC)CITY OF LA MESA ZONING ORDINANCE EXISTING APPROVALS:

TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TTM 16-01SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN DAB 16-13SPECIAL PERMIT SP 16-10VARIANCE V 16-03DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DRB 16-13 SCOPE OF WORK:

NEW CONSTRUCTION OF 32 RESIDENTIAL DETACHED CONDOMINIUM UNITS CONSTRUCTION TYPE:

TYPE V-B WITH NFPA AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM THROUGHOUT (GROSS BUILDING AREA INCREASE PER 504.2 & 506.3.2) NUMBER OF STORIES:
2 LEVELS OF 'R-2' WITH ON GRADE PARKING
ZONING:

R1S SUBURBAN RESDIENTIAL
PROPOSED:
32 NEW DETACHED CONDOMINIUM UNITS AND A TOTAL OF 64 PARKING SPACESPROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT FROM 21'PER SLOPE OF GRADE. SEE ELEVATIONS AND SECTIONS.

SITE AREA:
370,695 SF
SET BACKS:

REAR YARD = 20'SIDE YARD = 20'FRONT = 20'PROPOSED HEIGHT = 21' PARKING:

REQUIRED - 1.5 PER 2BR UNIT (32 UNITS) = 48PROVIDED
2 PER UNIT (32 UNITS) - TOTAL OF 6432 SPOTS ARE COMPACT32 SPOTS ARE FULLSIZED AND COVERED28 UNIS HAVE TANDEM PARKING4 UNITS HAVE SIDE BY SIDE PARKING FIRE:

ALL PRIVATE ROADS TO COMPLY WITH FIREACCESS PROVISION
AFFORDABLE UNITS:

AFFORDABLE UNITS PER GOVERMENT CODE SECTION 65915TOTAL OF 4 UNITS:
21A22A23A24A

PROJECT DATA

LOCATION MAP

PROJECT AREAS

1. IN THE EVENT THAT ANY PREHISTORIC OR HISTORIC SUBSURFACE CULTURAL RESOURCES ARE DISCOVERED DURING CONSTRUCTION-PHASE GROUND-DISTURBING ACTIVITIES, ALL WORK IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY SHALL HALT AND THE PROJECT PROPONENT SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY OF LA MESA IMMEDIATELY. A QUALIFIED ARCHAEOLOGIST SHALL BE HIRED TO FIRST DETERMINE WHETHER IT IS A "TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCE" PURSUANT TO SECTION 2107 4 OF THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE, A "UNIQUE ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCE" PURSUANT TO SECTION 21083.2(G) OF THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE, OR A HISTORICAL RESOURCE PURSUANT TO SECTION 15064.S(A) OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) GUIDELINES. IF THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCE IS DETERMINED TO BE A "TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCE", "UNIQUE ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCE", OR A "HISTORICAL RESOURCE", THE ARCHAEOLOGIST SHALL FORMULATE A MITIGATION PLAN IN CONSULTATION WITH THE CITY OF LA MESA AND THE NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION THAT SATISFIES THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ABOVE-REFERENCED SECTIONS AND PROVIDES FOR ONGOING MONITORING.

2. IF HUMAN REMAINS ARE ENCOUNTERED DURING EXCAVATION ACTIVITIES, ALL WORK SHALL HALT IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY AND THE PROJECT PROPONENT SHALL NOTIFY THE COUNTY CORONER. FOR HUMAN REMAINS DETERMINED TO BE OF NATIVE AMERICAN ORIGIN, THE PROCEDURES OUTLINED IN CEQA SECTION 15064.5 (D) AND (E) SHALL BE FOLLOWED. THE PROJECT PROPONENT SHALL ENSURE, TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE CITY AND THE NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE FOUNDATION, IF APPLICABLE, THAT APPROPRIATE MEASURES ARE UNDERTAKEN PRIOR TO RESUMING ANY PROJECT ACTIVITIES THAT MAY AFFECT SUCH RESOURCES.

3. FOR ANY PERIPHERAL EQUIPMENT TO BE USED DURING CONSTRUCTION, SUBMIT SPECIFICATIONS DEMONSTRATING THAT NOISE EMISSIONS WILL NOT EXCEED A FREQUENCY OF 15 KHZ AT A DISTANCE OF 50 FEET (TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH MITIGATION MEASURE BIO-1.2.)

4. PART 2, 2A AND 2B, OF THE CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION RECYCLING REPORT FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED TO THE BUILDING INSPECTOR PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION. LMMC 14.27.040.

CONSTRUCTION NOTES
A) SOILS COMPLIANCE PRIOR TO FOUNDATION INSPECTION, CBC 1705.6, TABLE 1705.6.B) STEEL FABRICATION INVOLVING WELDING, THERMAL CUTTING OR HEATING, NOT WITHIN CBC 1704.2.5.2 PROVISIONS FOR SHOP-FABRICATION. CBC 1705.2 AND EXCEPTION.C) HIGH STRENGTH BOLTING. CBC 1705.2.1, AISC 360 SECTION N6.D) STRUCTURAL CONCRETE WHERE STRUCTURAL DESIGN IS BASED ON SPECIFIED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH GREATER THAN 2500PSI. CBC 1705.3 AND EXCEPTIONS, TABLE 1705.3.E) ENGINEERED MASONRY CONSTRUCTION. CBC 1705.4 AND EXCEPTIONS, 1705.4.2.F) NAILING, BOLTING AND ANCHORING OF WOOD-FRAMED SEISMIC-FORCE-RESISTING COMPONENTS, WHERE SHEAR PANEL SHEATHING FASTENER SPACING IS LESS THAN 4 INCHES ON CENTER. CBC1705.11.2 AND EXCEPTION (SDC 'D'). G) WORK REQUIRED TO BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS NOT CONTAINED IN CODE OR STANDARDS, E.G. SPECIAL INSPECTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH ENGINEER OF RECORD REQUIREMENTS. CBC 1705.1.1.

SPECIAL INSPECTION NOTES
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL IN COMPLIANCE WITH CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE (CGBSC) SECTION 4.410.1 AND ACCEPTABLE TO BUILDING DIVISION INSPECTORS, MUST INCLUDE:

CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS

1. COPIES OF ALL SPECIAL INSPECTION OBSERVATION REPORTS, INCLUDING SOILS COMPLIANCE OBSERVATION REPORTS;

2. COPIES OF ALL CALIFORNIA ENERGY EFFICIENCY STANDARDS COMPLIANCE, INSTALLATION AND ACCEPTANCE FORMS FOR ENVELOPE, MECHANICAL, INDOOR AND OUTDOOR LIGHTING COMPLIANCE;

3. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORCED AIR UNIT, FANCOIL, AIR CONDITIONING CONDENSER, DUCTWORK AND FILTERS;

4. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE INSTRUCTIONS FOR INDOOR AIR QUALITY VENTILATION SYSTEMS;5. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE INSTRUCTIONS FOR WATER HEATING AND WATER CONSERVATION DEVICES;

6. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE INSTRUCTIONS FOR ALL OTHER EQUIPMENT AND APPLIANCES;7. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE INSTRUCTIONS FOR LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION SYSTEM;8. INSTRUCTIONS FOR ROOF GUTTER AND DOWNSPOUT MAINTENANCE AND INFORMATION REGARDING IMPORTANCE OF DIVERTING WATER AWAY FROM FOUNDATION;

9. INFORMATION REGARDING SOLAR ENERGY AND AVAILABLE INCENTIVE PROGRAMS;10. INFORMATION FROM LOCAL UTILITY, WATER AND WASTE RECOVERY PROVIDERS REGARDING RESOURCE CONSUMPTION REDUCTION METHODS AND LOCAL RECYCLING PROGRAMS AND LOCATIONS;

11. INFORMATION REGARDING WATER CONSERVATION METHODS;12. INFORMATION REGARDING ROUTINE BUILDING MAINTENANCE, INCLUDING PAINTING, SEALING AND CAULKING;

13. INFORMATION REGARDING METHODS TO MAINTAIN 30-60% RELATIVE INTERIOR HUMIDITY LEVELS;14. VOC COMPLIANCE INFORMATION FOR PAINTS, SEALANTS, CAULKING AND INTERIOR FINISH MATERIALS USED IN BUILDING;

15. INFORMATION REGARDING LOCAL AREA PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION AND/OR CARPOOL PROGRAMS.MANUAL TO BE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW BY BUILDING INSPECTOR PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION.

A COPY OF MANUAL TO PROVIDED TO PROPERTY OWNER, OCCUPANT AND/OR TENANT AFTER FINAL INSPECTION. CGBSC 4.410.1
REVISION #2

ARCHITECTURAL SET
A-101 UNIT A FLOOR PLANA-102 UNIT B FLOOR PLANA-103 UNIT C FLOOR PLANA-111 RCP TYPE-AA-112 RCP UNIT-BA-113 RCP TYPE-CA-201 UNIT A ELEVATIONSA-202 UNIT B ELEVATIONSA-203 UNIT C ELEVATIONSA-301 BUILDING A SECTIONSA-302 BUILDING B SECTIONSA-303 BUILDING C SECTIONSA-401 DOOR & WINDOW SCHEDULE AD-101 TYPICAL DETAILSAD-102 PENETRATION DETAILSAD-103 ROOF DETAILSAD-104 SPECIFICATIONSAD-105 SPECIFICATIONS

TITLE SHEETS
TS-001 COVER SHEETTS-002 DRAWING SYMBOLS & NOTESTS-101 EXISTING SITE PLANTS-102 IMPROVED SITE PLANTS-103 SITE SECTIONSTS-104 SITE ELEMENTSTS-105 OPEN SPACE PLAN & SITE ELEMENTS

COMMUNITY OUTDOOR SPACE / LANSCAPE AREA
R-004 DESIGN 1R-005 DESIGN 2R-006 DESIGN 3

STRUCTURAL SHEETS
S-1.0 GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTESS-1.1 SHEARWALL SCHEDULE & STANDARD DETAILSS-1.2 TYPICAL STANDARD DETAILSS-1.3 TYPICAL STANDARD DETAILSS-2.0 UNIT A STRUCTURAL PLANSS-2.1 UNIT B STRUCTURAL PLANSS-2.2 UNIT'S B & C ROOF FRAMING PLANSS-2.3 UNIT C STRUCTURAL PLANSS-3.0 FOUNDATION DETAILSS-3.1 TYPICAL STANDARD DETAILSS-3.2 FLOOR FRAMING DETAILSS-3.3 ROOF FRAMING DETAILS

Page 351 of 615 ends

COLUMN GRID LINE

DETAIL BUGBUILDING SECTION/ELEVATIONSPOT ELEVATION/COORDINATES/DATUMREVISION

SEE TITLE BLOCK FOR
REVISION. MOST RECENT

REVISIONS SHOWN

CLOUDED

NORTH ARROWINTERIOR ELEVATION REFERENCEROOM IDENTIFICATIONDOOR TAG

SECTION DESIGNATION

DRAWING NUMBER

DETAIL NUMBER

DRAWING NUMBER

SHEET NUMBER

DRAWING NUMBER

ROOM NAME

WALL/PARTITION TAGWINDOW TAG

PROJECT NORTH

TRUE NORTH

HOSE BIBB HBFLOOR DRAIN FDSTAIR/WALL SECTION

SECTION DESIGNATION

DRAWING NUMBER

PROPERTY LINESCUPPER

ROOM SQUARE FEET
N
1 ROOM NAME

FLOOR/ROOF TAG
S
G
DC
1A
PLCL
?

MATERIAL
0 A101
1 SIM
1 A101
SIM
1 A101
SIM
A101
1 Ref
1 Ref
1 Ref
1 Ref
101

CEILING TAGKEYNOTE TAGROOF DRAINCENTER LINE

EXTERIOR FINISH

INTERIOR FINISH

TOP FINISH

BOTTOM FINISH

MATERIAL

ROOM HEIGHT
Drawn byReviewed by
1 D Project number
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:MEP:STRUCTURAL ENGINEER:Developer:

N.T.C. Development Inc.1380 El Cajon BLVD. Ste. 202El Cajon, CA 92020Phone: 619.593.2600 InDev + Design, INC © 2021 All Rights Reserved
Architect:

InDev+Design, Inc.2120 Columbia St.Suite 17 San Diego, CA 92101Phone: 858.231.9914 PROJECT ADDRESS:
8043 HIGH St.LA MESA, CA 91941

REVISIONS
Submittal DatePlan Date
TBD
DEC 2021
PROJECT STATUS:

AJB

ZS / CG

CANTERA-KISHOUSE
PROJECT # B19-319-324
TS-002
5/4/2022 1:59:50 PM

DRAWINGSYMBOLS &NOTES

CANTERA

ELECTRICAL CODE NOTES

1. ALL ELECTRICAL WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE.2. ALL OUTDOOR LIGHTING SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CITY OF LA MESA OUTSIDE LIGHTING REGULATIONS.

3. ALL INTERIOR LIGHTING SYSTEMS SHALL COMPLY WITH CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION STANDARDS.

4. SMOKE DETECTORS AND CARBON MONOXIDE ALARMS SHALL BE INTERCONNECTED AND SOUND AN ALARM AUDIBLE IN ALL SLEEPING AREAS AND SHALL BE I.C.B.O. APPROVED.

5. KITCHENS AND ROOMS CONTAINING A WATER CLOSET SHALL HAVE AT LEAST ONE LIGHT FIXTURE WITH AN EFFICIENCY OF NOT LESS THAN 40 LUMENS PER WATT (FLUORESCENT).

6. SMOKE DETECTORS AND CARBON MONOXIDE ALARMS SHALL BE CONNECTED TO THE BUILDING WIRING SYSTEM IN NEW CONSTRUCTION AND BE PROVIDED WITH BATTERYBACKUP. WIRING SHALL BE PERMANENT WITHOUT A DISCONNECT SWITCH.

7. NO ALUMINUM CONDUCTORS PERMITTED. (CEC, 310 AND 331 THROUGH 351)8. RECEPTACLE OUTLETS SHALL BE LOCATED 15" OFF THE FINISHED FLOOR, MEASURED TO THE BOTTOM OF THE OUTLET.

9. ANY FIXED APPLIANCE SUCH AS DISPOSAL, DISHWASHER, CLOTHES WASHER, DRYER, BUILT-IN HEATERS, OR ANY OTHER FIXED APPLIANCE WITH 1/4 H.P. MOTOR OR LARGER,SHALL BE ON A SEPARATE #12 AWG WIRE BRANCH CIRCUIT. EACH DWELLING UNIT SHALLHAVE INSTALLED THEREIN AN INDIVIDUAL DISPOSAL CIRCUIT SUPPLIED WITH MINIMUM #12AWG WIRE AND A 15 AMP INDICATING-TYPE SWITCH (NEC 210-23 AND 220).

10. TAMPER RESISTANT RECEPTACLES SHALL BE INSTALLED PER CEC 201611. ALL INCANDESCENT LIGHTING FIXTURES RECESSED INTO INSULATED CEILINGS MUST BE APPROVED OR HAVE ZERO CLEARANCE. INSULATION COVER (I.C.) BY UNDERWRITERSLABORATORY.

12. ALL ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL AND PLUMBING FIXTURES/ EQUIPMENT SHOULD BE LISTED AND LABELED BY AN APPROVED TESTING AGENCY. TESTING BY AN APPROVED TESTINGLABORATORY WILL BE REQUIRED BEFORE FINAL APPROVAL IS GRANTED, OR SPECIALINSPECTION BILL BE REQUIRED TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH NEC, ANSI, AND NEMASTANDARDS. MANUFACTURER'S DATA SHEETS, TEST REPORTS, ECT. SHALL BE PROVIDED TOALLOW FOR EVALUATION.

13. LIGHT FIXTURES TO BE STATE CERTIFIED.14. BATHROOM RECEPTACLES SHALL BE SERVED BY A DEDICATED 20 AMP CIRCUIT CEC SECT. 210-52(d) AND BE GFI CERTIFIED.

15. ALL BRANCH CIRCUITS THAT SUPPLY 125 VOLT, SINGLE PHASE, 15 AND 20 AMP RECEPTACLE OUTLETS THAT ARE NOT GFI SHALL BE PROTECTED BY AN ARC FAULT CIRCUITINTERRUPTER(S) - CEC SECT. 210-12(b).

16. A DEDICATED 20 AMP. CIRCUIT IS REQUIRED TO SERVE THE REQUIRED BATHROOM RECEPTACLES PER CEC ARTICLE 210-10(C) 3.

17. TWO 20-AMP SMALL APPLIANCE BRANCH CIRCUITS SERVING THE KITCHEN COUNTER RECEPTACLES SHALL HAVE NO OTHER OUTLETS PER CEC ARTICLE 210-52(B) AND BE GFICERTIFIED.

18. ELECTRICAL RECEPTACLE OUTLETS ON BRANCH CIRCUITS OF 30 AMPERES OR LESS AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEM RECEPTACLES SHALL BE LOCATED NO MORE THAN 48" FROM THETOP OF THE RECEPTACLE OUTLET BOX OR RECEPTACLE HOUSING NOR LESS THAN 15"MEASURED FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE RECEPTACLE OUTLET BOX OR RECEPTACLEHOUSING TO THE LEVEL OF THE FINISHED FLOOR OR WORKING PLATFORM.

SMOKE/CARBON MONOXIDE NOTES

1. SMOKE DETECTORS/CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTORS SHALL BE PERMANENTLY WIRED AND INTERCONNECTED W/ BATTERY BACK-UPS PER SECTION 420, 2016 CBC.

2. ALL DETECTORS SHALL SOUND AN ALARM AUDIBLE IN ALL SLEEPING AREAS AND SHALL BE I.C.B.O. APPROVED.

3. SMOKE DETECTORS/CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTORS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 420, PER 2016 CBC.

EGRESS AND STAIRWAYS
1009.3 EXCEPTIONS: EXIT ACCESS STAIRWAYS SERVING AND CONTAINED WITHIN A SINGLE RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNIT OR SLEEPING UNIT IN GROUP R-1, R-2, OR R-3OCCUPANCIES ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE ENCLOSED. 1009.9.2 OUTDOOR CONDITIONS: OUTDOOR STAIRWAYS AND OUTDOOR APPROACHES TO STAIRWAYS SHALL BE DESIGNED SO THAT WATER WILL NOT ACCUMULATE ONWALKING SURFACES. 1009.9.4 ENCLOSURES UNDER EXTERIOR STAIRWAYS: THERE SHALL BE NO ENCLOSED USABLE SPACE UNDER EXTERIOR EXIT STAIRWAYS UNLESS THE SPACE IS COMPLETELYENCLOSED IN 1-HOUR FIRE-RESISTANCE-RATED CONSTRUCTION. 1027.1 GENERAL: EXITS SHALL DISCHARGE DIRECTLY TO THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING.

THE EXIT DISCHARGE SHALL BE AT GRADE OR SHALL PROVIDE A DIRECT PATH OFEGRESS TRAVEL TO GRADE. THE EXIT DISCHARGE SHALL NOT REENTER A BUILDING.THE COMBINED USE OF EXCEPTIONS 1 AND 2 SHALL NOT EXCEED 50 PERCENT OF THENUMBER AND CAPACITY OF THE REQUIRED EXITS.

FIRE NOTES

1. BUILDINGS UNDERGOING CONSTRUCTION, ALTERATION OR DEMOLITION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CFC ARTICLE 33

2. ADDRESS SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR ALL NEW AND EXISTING BUILDINGS IN A POSITION AS TO BE PLAINLY VISIBLE AND LEGIBLE FROM THE STREET OR ROAD FRONTING THEPROPERTY (UFC/CFC SEC. 901.4.4, FHPS POLICY P-00-6).

4. AT LEAST ONE FIRE EXTINGUISHER WITH A MINIMUM RATING OF 2A10BC SHALL BE PROVIDED WITHIN 75' MAXIMUM TRAVEL DISTANCE FOR EACH 6000 SQ. FT. OR PORTIONTHEREOF ON EACH FLOOR PER CAL FIRE CODE, SEC. 906 & CAL. CODE REG., TIT. 19, 3.5.

5. COMPLETE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS; FIRE-EXTINGUISHING SYSTEMS, INCLUDING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLERS AND WET & DRY STANDPIPES; HALONSYSTEMS AND OTHER SPECIAL TYPES OF AUTOMATIC FIRE -EXTINGUISHING SYSTEMS;BASEMENT PIPE INLETS; AND OTHER FIRE-PROTECTION SYSTEMS AND APPURTENANCESTHERETO SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO FIRE AND HAZARD PREVENTION SERVICES FOR REVIEWAND APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. (UFC/CFC SEC. 1001.3)

6. FIRE-EXTINGUISHING SYSTEMS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH UBC/CBC SEC. 904 AND COMPLY WITH UBC STANDARDS 9-1 AND 9-2.

7. ALL VALVES CONTROLLING THE WATER SUPPLY FOR AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEMS AND WATER FLOW SWITCHES ON ALL SPRINKLER SYSTEMS SHALL BE ELECTRONICALLYMONITORED WHERE THE NUMBER OF SPRINKLERS IS 20 OR MORE. (UBC/CBC SEC. 1003.3.1)

8. FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH UFC/CFC SEC. 1007.9. AT LEAST ONE FIRE EXTINGUISHER WITH A MINIMUM RATING OF 4-A-20BC SHALL BE PROVIDED OUTSIDE EACH MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, OR BOILER ROOM. (UFC/CFC SEC.1002, UFC STANDARD 10-1, CAL. CODE REGS. TIT 19, SEC. 3.29)

10. FIRE PROTECTION, INCLUDING FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS AND WATER SUPPLIES FOR FIRE PROTECTION, SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MADE SERVICEABLE PRIOR TO ANDDURING TIME OF CONSTRUCTION. (UFC/CFC SEC. 901.3, 8704.2, 8704.3)

11. PROVIDE AN APPROVED ILLUMINATED DIRECTORY CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FHPS POLICY I-00-6. COMPLETE, FULLY DIMENSIONED PLANS SHOWING MATERIALS,METHOD OF CONSTRUCTION AND LOCATION OF INSTALLATION SHALL BE SUBMITTED TOFIRE AND HAZARD PREVENTION SERVICES FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL. (UFC/CFC SEC.901.4.4)

12. THE EGRESS PATH SHALL REMAIN FREE AND CLEAR OF ALL OBSTRUCTIONS AT ALL TIMES.

NO STORAGE IS PERMITTED IN ANY EGRESS PATHS.

13. COMPLETE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ALL FIRE EXTINGUISHING SYSTEMS, INCLUDING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER AND STANDPIPE SYSTEMS AND OTHER SPECIAL FIREEXTINGUISHING SYSTEMS AND RELATED APPURTENANCES SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THECITY OF LA MESA FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.

14. COMPLETE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ALL FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF LA MESA DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FOR REVIEW ANDAPPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. (CFC 907.1.1)

15. LOCATIONS AND CLASSIFICATIONS OF EXTINGUISHERS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CFC 906 AND CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS (CCR) TITLE 19

16. DURING CONSTRUCTION, AT LEAST ONE EXTINGUISHER SHALL BE PROVIDED ON EACH FLOOR LEVEL AT EACH STAIRWAY, IN ALL STORAGE AND CONSTRUCTION SHEDS, INLOCATIONS WHERE FLAMMABLE OR COMBUSTIBLE LIQUIDS ARE STORED OR USED, ANDWHERE OTHER SPECIAL HAZARDS ARE PRESENT PER CFC 1415.1.

17. IN BUILDINGS FOUR OR MORE STORIES IN HEIGHT, STANDPIPES SHALL BE PROVIDED DURING CONSTRUCTION WHEN HEIGHT REACHES 40 FEET ABOVE THE LOWEST LEVEL OFFIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS. A FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION SHALL BE NO MORE THAN100 FEET FROM AVAILABLE FIRE DEPARTMENT VEHICLE ACCESS ROADWAYS. CFC 1410,1413

18. BUILDINGS UNDERGOING CONSTRUCTION, ALTERATION, OR DEMOLITION SHALL CONFORM TO CFC CHAPTER 33. WELDING, CUTTING, AND OTHER HOT WORK SHALL BE INCONFORMANCE WITH CFC CHAPTER 35.

19. ADDRESS IDENTIFICATION SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR ALL NEW AND EXISTING BUILDINGS IN A LOCATION THAT IS PLAINLY VISIBLE AND LEGIBLE FROM THE STREET OR ROAD FRONTINGTHE PROPERTY. WHERE ACCESS IS BY WAY OF A PRIVATE ROAD AND THE BUILDINGADDRESS CANNOT BE VIEWED FROM THE PUBLIC WAY, AN APPROVED SIGN OR MEANSSHALL BE USED TO IDENTIFY THE STRUCTURE.PREMISES IDENTIFICATION SHALL CONFORMTO SECTION 501.2. OF THE CBC

20. WALL, FLOOR AND CEILING FINISHES AND MATERIALS SHALL NOT EXCEED THE INTERIOR FINISH CLASSIFICATION IN CBC TABLE 803.3 AND SHALL MEET THE FLAME PROPAGATIONPERFORMANCE CRITERIA OF THE CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, TITLE 19, DIVISION1. DECORATIVE MATERIALS SHALL BE PROPERLY TREATED BY A PRODUCT OR PROCESSAPPROVED BY THE STATE FIRE MARSHALL WITH APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTATIONPROVIDED TO THE CITY OF LA MESA.

21. KEY BOXES SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR ALL (HIGH-RISE BUILDINGS, POOL ENCLOSURES, GATES IN THE PATH OF FIREFIGHTER TRAVEL TO STRUCTURES, SECURED PARKINGLEVELS, DOORS GIVING ACCESS TO ALARM PANELS AND/OR ANNUNCIATORS, ANDANYOTHER) STRUCTURES OR AREAS WHERE ACCESS TO AN AREA IS RESTRICTED.

22. DUMPSTERS AND TRASH CONTAINERS EXCEEDING 1.5 CUBIC YARDS SHALL NOT BE STORED IN BUILDINGS OR PLACED WITHIN 5 FEET OF COMBUSTIBLE WALLS, OPENINGS ORCOMBUSTIBLE ROOF EAVE LINES UNLESS PROTECTED BY AN APPROVED SPRINKLERSYSTEM OR LOCATED IN A TYPE I OR IIA STRUCTURE SEPARATED BY 10 FEET FROM OTHERSTRUCTURES. CONTAINERS LARGER THAN 1 CUBIC YARD SHALL BE OF NON- ORLIMITED-COMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS OR SIMILARLY PROTECTED OR SEPARATED. CFC 304.3.

23. EXITS, EXIT SIGNS, FIRE ALARM PANELS, HOSE CABINETS, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND STANDPIPE CONNECTIONS SHALL NOT BE CONCEALED BY CURTAINS, MIRRORS, OROTHER DECORATIVE MATERIAL.

24. THE CARBON MONOXIDE ALARMS SHALL BE LISTED AS COMPLYING WITH UL 2034 AND SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA 720 AND THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS.

25. ALL CARBON MONOXIDE ALARMS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH THE CAPABILITY TO SUPPORT VISIBLE ALARM NOTIFICATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA 720 PER SECTION 420.4.1.6.

26. SMOKE ALARMS TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE 2010 CBC SPECIFICALLY AS SHOWN ON SECTION 907.2.11 THROUGH SECTION 907.2.11.4

27. LOCATIONS AND CLASSIFICATIONS OF EXTINGUISHERS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CFC 906 AND CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS (CCR), TITLE 19.

28. DURING CONSTRUCTION, AT LEAST ONE EXTINGUISHER SHALL BE PROVIDED ON EACH FLOOR LEVEL AT EACH STAIRWAY, IN ALL STORAGE AND CONSTRUCTION SHEDS, INLOCATIONS WHERE FLAMMABLE OR COMBUSTIBLE LIQUIDS ARE STORED OR USED, ANDWHERE OTHER SPECIAL HAZARDS ARE PRESENT PER CFC SECTION 3315.1.

29. STANDPIPE SYSTEMS SHALL BE INSTALLED WHERE REQUIRED BY SECTIONS 905.3.1 THROUGH 905.3.11.1. STANDPIPE SYSTEMS ARE ALLOWED TO BE COMBINED WITHAUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEMS.

30. BUILDINGS UNDERGOING CONSTRUCTION, ALTERATION, OR DEMOLITION SHALL CONFORM TO CFC CHAPTER 33. WELDING, CUTTING, AND OTHER HOT WORK SHALL BE INCONFORMANCE WITH CFC CHAPTER 35.

31. WALL, FLOOR AND CEILING FINISHES AND MATERIALS SHALL NOT EXCEED THE INTERIOR FINISH CLASSIFICATIONS IN CBC TABLE 803.9 AND SHALL MEET THE FLAME PROPAGATIONPERFORMANCE CRITERIA OF THE CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, TITLE 19, DIVISION1. DECORATIVE MATERIALS SHALL BE PROPERLY TREATED BY A PRODUCT OR PROCESSAPPROVED BY THE STATE FIRE MARSHAL WITH APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTATION PROVIDEDTO THE CITY OF LA MESA.

32. THE EGRESS PATH SHALL REMAIN FREE AD CLEAR OF ALL OBSTRUCTIONS AT ALL TIMES.

NO STORAGE IS PERMITTED IN ANY EGRESS PATHS.
33 ALL FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADWAYS MUST BE MAINTAINED UNOBSTRUCTED AND DRIVABLE BY FIRE APPARATUS THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS. ACCESSROADWAYS SHALL BE CAPABLE OF HOLDING AN IMPOSED LOAD OF 75,000 POUNDS INBOTH NORMAL AND ADVERSE WEATHER CONDITIONS. PROVIDE A SIGNED STATEMENTFROM AN APPROPRIATELY LICENSED ENGINEER STATING THAT THE PAVERS TO BEINSTALLED AS A PART OF THIS PROJECT SHALL MEET THE AFOREMENTIONED CRITERIA. 34 ANY GATE OR BARRIER ACROSS A FIRE ACCESS ROADWAY, WHETHER MANUAL OR AUTOMATIC, MUST MEET THE HEARTLAND FIRE & RESCUE REQUIREMENTS AND HAVESPECIFIC PLANS AND PERMITS APPROVED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. GATES SERVINGMULTI-FAMILY, ASSEMBLY, EDUCATIONAL, HAZARDOUS, INSTITUTIONAL, OR STORAGE/STRUCTURES MUST BE AUTOMATIC AND MEET UL 325 AND ASTM F 2200 STANDARDS. KNOXBRAND KEY-OPERATED ELECTRIC KEY SWITCH KEYED TO HEARTLAND FIRE & RESCUESPECIFICATION ARE REQUIRED. THE KNOX SWITCH SHALL OVERRIDE ALL GATE FUNCTIONSAND OPEN THE GATE. OTHER ACCESS CONTROL SYSTEMS SUCH AS OPTICOM, SIREN, ETC.SHALL BE PERMITTED WITH THE APPROVAL OF HEARTLAND FIRE & RESCUE. 35 ANY AND ALL COMMUNAL BBQ'S (IF PRESENT) SHALL REQUIRE EMERGENCY SHUTOFF DEVICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA 54.

CAL GREEN NOTES

1. AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEMS CONTROLLERS INSTALLED AT THE TIME OF FINAL INSPECTION SHALL BE WEATHER-BASED. (CGBSC 4.304.1)

2. JOINTS AND OPENINGS, ANNULAR SPACES AROUND PIPES, ELECTRIC CABLES, CONDUITS, OR OTHER OPENINGS IN PLATES AT EXTERIOR WALLS SHALL BE PROTECTED AGAINST THEPASSAGE OF RODENTS BY CLOSING SUCH OPENINGS WITH CEMENT MORTAR, CONCRETEMASONRY OR SIMILAR METHOD ACCEPTABLE TO THE ENFORCING AGENCY. (CGBSC 4.406.1)

3. A MINIMUM OF 50 PERCENT OF THE CONSTRUCTION WASTE GENERATED AT THE SITE IS DIVERTED TO RECYCLE OR SALVAGE PER CGBSC SECTION 4.408.1 AND CITY ORDINANCE.

4. BEFORE FINAL INSPECTION, A COMPLETE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE BUILDING OCCUPANT OR OWNER. CONTRACTOR OR OWNER SHALLSUBMIT AN AFFIDAVIT THAT CONFIRMS THE DELIVERY OF THE MAINTENANCE MANUAL.(CGBSC 4.410.1)

5. DUCT OPENINGS AND OTHER RELATED AIR DISTRIBUTION COMPONENT OPENINGS SHALL BE COVERED DURING CONSTRUCTION. (CGBSC 4.504.1)

6. ADHESIVES, SEALANTS AND CAULKS SHALL BE COMPLIANT WITH VOC AND OTHER TOXIC COMPOUND LIMITS. (CGBSC 4.504.2.1)

7. PAINTS, STAINS AND OTHER COATINGS SHALL BE COMPLIANT WITH VOC LIMITS. (CGBSC

4.504.2.2)

8. AEROSOL PAINTS AND COATINGS SHALL BE COMPLIANT WITH PRODUCT WEIGHTED MIR LIMITS FOR VOC AND OTHER TOXIC COMPOUNDS. (CGBSC 4.504.2.3)

9. DOCUMENTATION SHALL BE PROVIDED TO VERIFY THAT COMPLIANT VOC LIMIT FINISH MATERIALS HAVE BEEN USED. A LETTER FROM THE CONTRACTOR AND OR THE BUILDINGOWNER CERTIFYING WHAT MATERIAL HAS BEEN USED AND ITS COMPLIANCE WITH THECODE MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE BUILDING INSPECTOR. (CGBSC 4.504.2.4)

10. CARPET AND CARPET SYSTEMS SHALL BE COMPLIANT WITH VOC LIMITS. A LETTER FROM THE CONTRACTOR AND OR THE BUILDING OWNER CERTIFYING WHAT MATERIAL HAS BEENUSED AND ITS COMPLIANCE WITH THE CODE MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE BUILDINGINSPECTOR. (CGBSC 4.504.3)

11. FIFTY PERCENT OF FLOOR AREA RECEIVING RESILIENT FLOORING SHALL COMPLY WITH THE VOCEMISSION LIMITS DEFINED IN THE COLLABORATIVE FOR HIGH PERFORMANCE SCHOOLS(CHPS) LOWEMITTING MATERIALS LIST OR BE CERTIFIED UNDER THE RESILIENT FLOORCOVERING INSTITUTE (RCFI) FLOOR SCORE PROGRAM." (CGBSC 4.504.4)

12. PARTICLEBOARD, MEDIUM DENSITY FIBERBOARD (MDF), AND HARDWOOD PLYWOOD COMPOSITE WOOD PRODUCTS USED ON THE INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDINGSHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR FORMALDEHYDE AS SPECIFIED IN TABLE 5.504.4.(CGBSC 5.504.4.5)

13. BUILDING MATERIALS WITH VISIBLE SIGNS OF WATER DAMAGE SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED.

WALLS AND FLOORS FRAMING SHALL NOT BE ENCLOSED WHEN FRAMING MEMBERS EXCEED19% MOISTURE CONTENT.

14. THE MOISTURE CONTENT OF BUILDING MATERIALS USED IN WALL AND FLOOR FRAMING IS CHECKED BEFORE ENCLOSURE. MOISTURE CONTENT SHALL BE VERIFIED BY EITHER APROBE TYPE OR CONTACT TYPE MOISTURE METER. A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCEINDICATING DATE OF TEST, LOCATION AND RESULTS ISSUED BY THE FRAMERSUBCONTRACTOR OR GENERAL CONTRACTOR MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE BUILDINGINSPECTOR. (CGBSC 4.505.3)

15. EXHAUST FANS WHICH TERMINATE OUTSIDE THE BUILDING ARE PROVIDED IN EVERY BATHROOM THAT CONTAINS A SHOWER OR TUB. UNLESS FUNCTIONING AS A COMPONENTOF A WHOLE HOUSE VENTILATION SYSTEM, FANS MUST BE CONTROLLED BY A HUMIDISTATWHICH CAN ADJUST BETWEEN 50 TO 80 PERCENT."

16. 100% OF TREES, STUMPS, ROCKS, AND ASSOCIATED VEGETATION AND SOILS RESULTING FROM LAND CLEARING SHALL BE REUSED OR RECYCLED. A LETTER FROM THECONTRACTOR WITH VERIFICATIONS NEEDS TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE INSPECTOR TO SHOWCOMPLIANCE.

17. PREVENT IRRIGATION SPRAY ON STRUCTURES.18. PROVIDE A LETTER FROM THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR BUILDING OWNER CERTIFYING WHAT PAINT HAS BEEN USED AND ITS COMPLIANCE WITH THE CODE MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THEBUILDING INSPECTOR.

19. SMOKING SHALL BE PROHIBITED WITHIN 25 FEET OF BUILDING ENTRIES, OUTDOOR AIR INTAKES AND OPERABLE WINDOWS WHERE OUTDOOR AREAS ARE PROVIDED FOR SMOKING,AND IN BUILDINGS. NO SMOKING SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED ACCORDINGLY. (CGBSC5.504.7)

20. PER CGBSC 5.504.4.6, RESILIENT FLOORING SYSTEMS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE VOC-EMISSION LIMITS DEFINED IN THE 2009 CHPS CRITERIA AND LISTED ON ITSLOW-EMITTING MATERIALS LIST (OR PRODUCT REGISTRY), OR CERTIFIED UNDER THEFOURSCORE PROGRAM OF THE RESILIENT FLOOR COVERING INSTITUTE.

21. PER 2016 CGBSC 4.506.1 MECHANICAL EXHAUST FANS WHICH EXHAUST DIRECTLY FROM BATHROOMS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING: 1) FANS SHALL BE ENERGY STARCOMPLIANT AND BE DUCTED TO TERMINATE OUTSIDE THE BUILDING. 2) UNLESSFUNCTIONING AS A WHOLE HOME VENTILATION SYSTEM, FANS MUST BE CONTROLLED BY AHUMIDISTAT WHICH SHALL BE READILY ACCESSIBLE. HUMIDISTAT CONTROLS SHALL BECAPABLE OF ADJUSTMENT BETWEEN A RELATIVE HUMIDITY RANGE OF 50 TO 80 PERCENT.

22. PER 2016 CGBSC 4.507.2 - THE ENERGY PRO COMPUTER PROGRAM WAS USED TO SIZE AND SELECT THE HEATING AND AIR CONDITIONING EQUIPMENT. THE INSTALLER MUST PRESENTA SIGNED AFFIDAVIT TO THE BUILDING INSPECTOR STATING THAT THE EQUIPMENT WASINSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THAT METHOD.

23. AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEMS CONTROLLERS INSTALLED AT THE TIME OF FINAL INSPECTION SHALL BE WEATHER-BASED.

24. A PLUMBING FIXTURE CERTIFICATION MUST BE COMPLETED AND SIGNED BY EITHER A LICENSED GENERAL CONTRACTOR, OR A PLUMBING SUBCONTRACTOR, OR THE BUILDINGOWNER CERTIFYING THE FLOW RATE OF THE FIXTURES INSTALLED. A COPY OF THECERTIFICATION CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT.

25. BUILDING MATERIALS WITH VISIBLE SIGNS OF WATER DAMAGE SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED.

WALLS AND FLOORS FRAMING SHALL NOT BE ENCLOSED WHEN FRAMING MEMBERS EXCEED19% MOISTURE CONTENT.

26. EXHAUST FANS WHICH TERMINATE OUTSIDE THE BUILDING ARE PROVIDED IN EVERY BATHROOM THAT CONTAINS A SHOWER OR TUB. UNLESS FUNCTIONING AS A COMPONENTOF A WHOLE HOUSE VENTILATION SYSTEM, FANS MUST BE CONTROLLED BY A HUMIDISTAT WHICH CAN ADJUST BETWEEN 50 TO 80 PERCENT.

BUILDING DEPARTMENT NOTES

1. PER CBC, ALL WEATHER EXPOSED SURFACES SHALL HAVE A WEATHER RESISTIVE BARRIER TO PROTECT THE INTERIOR WALL COVERING AND EXTERIOR OPENINGS SHALLBE FLASHED IN SUCH A MANNER TO MAKE THEM WEATHERPROOF.

2. PROVIDE PERMANENTLY WIRED-IN SMOKE PROTECTORS WITH BATTERY BACK-UP IN EACH SLEEPING ROOM AND IN A CENTRAL LOCATION TO PROTECT SLEEPING AREAS. SEEPLANS.

3. GLAZING ADJACENT TO W/IN 24" OF DOORS OR W/IN 18" OF WALKING SURFACE MUST BE OF SAFETY GLAZING MATERIAL. SEE WINDOW SCHEDULE FOR GLAZING NOTES.

4. GLAZING IN SHOWER AND/OR TUB ENCLOSURE MUST BE OF SAFETY GLAZING MATERIAL.5. PERMANENT VACUUM BREAKERS SHALL BE INCLUDED WITH ALL NEW HOSE BIBS.6. PROVIDE ULTRA LOW FLUSH TOILETS, AND MAXIMUM 2.2 GPM FLOW ON FAUCETS. NEW WATER CLOSETS AND ASSOCIATED FLUSHOMETER VALVES, IF ANY, SHALL USE NO MORETHAN 1.28 GALLONS PER FLUSH AND SHALL MEET PERFORMANCE STANDARDSESTABLISHED BY THE AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARDS INSTITUTE STANDARD A112.19.2H&S CODE, SECTION 17921.3(b).

7. ALL SHOWER HEADS AND FAUCETS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH FLOW RESTRICTORS AS OUTLINED IN THE APPLIANCE EFFICIENCY STANDARDS AND SHALL BE CERTIFIED BY THECALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION.

8. PROVIDE MIXING VALVES AT SHOWERS PER U.P.C. "IN SHOWERS AND TUB-SHOWER COMBINATIONS, CONTROL VALVES MUST BE PRESSURE BALANCED OR THERMOSTATICMIXING VALVES." U.P.C. SECTION 420.0.

9. SHOWER HEADS TO HAVE MAXIMUM 2.5 GPM FLOW.

10. MINIMUM CLEARANCE 30" CLEAR WIDTH FOR WATER CLOSET COMPARTMENTS AND 24" CLEARANCE IN FRONT OF WATER CLOSET.

11. ALL SWINGING DOORS AND WINDOWS LEADING TO UNCONDITIONED AREAS SHALL BE FULLY WEATHER STRIPPED.

12. FULLY SEAL ALL JOINTS AROUND WINDOW FRAMES AND OTHER PENETRATIONS SUCH AS WALL SOLE PLATES AND OPENING FOR UTILITY PIPING AND WIRING.

13. ALL NEW GLAZING WILL BE INSTALLED WITH A CERTIFYING LABEL ATTACHED, SHOWING THE U VALUE.

14. ALL EXHAUST FANS OR OTHER EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH BACK DRAFT DAMPERS OR AUTOMATIC DAMPERS.

15. THERMOSTATS (EXCEPT THOSE CONTROLLING HEAT PUMPS) SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH AN AUTOMATIC SETBACK THAT THE BUILDING OCCUPANTS CAN PROGRAM TOAUTOMATICALLY SETBACK THE THERMOSTAT FOR TWO PERIODS DURING ANY 24-HOURPERIOD.

16. EQUIPMENT THAT REQUIRES PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE TO MAINTAIN EFFICIENT OPERATION SHALL BE FURNISHED WITH COMPLETE NECESSARY MAINTENANCEINFORMATION.

17. ALL GAS-FIRED FAN TYPE CENTRAL FURNACES, GAS-FIRED FAN TYPE WALL FURNACES, AND COOKING APPLIANCES SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH AN INTERMITTENT IGNITIONDEVICE.

18. ALL TRANSVERSE DUCT, PLENUM, AND FITTING JOINTS SHALL BE SEALED WITH PRESSURE SENSITIVE TAPE OR MASTIC TO PREVENT AIR LOSS AND SHALL BE INSULATED TOCONFORM TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE U.M.C.

19. INSULATION SHALL COMPLY WITH CALIFORNIA QUALITY STANDARDS.20. THE INSULATION INSTALLER SHALL POST A SIGNED CERTIFICATE.21. STATE HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 17921.9 BANS THE USE OF CHLORINATED POLYVINYL CHLORIDE, CPVC AND CROSS LINKED POLYETHELYN (PEX) FOR INTERIORWATER SUPPLY PIPING.

22. THERE WILL BE NO DITCHES OVER 5' DEEP, OR BUILDING OVER 3 STORIES OR BUILDINGS OVER 36' HIGH.

23. EXTERIOR GLAZING IN BEDROOMS WILL BE MINIMUM 1/10 OF FLOOR AREA, AND OPEN 1/20 OF FLOOR AREA WITH MAXIMUM 44" SILL HEIGHT.

24. GAS VENTS AND NONCOMBUSTIBLE PIPING IN WALLS, PASSING THROUGH THREE FLOORS OR LESS, SHALL BE EFFECTIVELY DRAFT STOPPED AT EACH FLOOR OR CEILING, PER CBC.

25. PROVIDE PERMANENTLY WIRED IN SMOKE DETECTORS WITH BATTERY BACKUP POWER IN EACH SLEEPING ROOM, IN A CENTRAL LOCATION TO PROTECT SLEEPING AREAS, INCEILINGS WITH A HEIGHT GREATER THAN 24" THAN THE HALLWAY CEILING SLEEPINGAREAS AND ON EACH STORY AND IN BASEMENT (SEC.310.9) INDOOR WATER USE 4.303.1
.1 THE EFFECTIVE FLUSH VOLUME OF ALL WATER CLOSETS SHALL NOT EXCEED 1.28 GALLONS PER FLUSH. TANK-TYPE WATER CLOSETS SHALL BE CERTIFIED TO THEPERFORMANCE CRITERIA OF THE U.S. EPA WATERSENSE SPECIFICATION FOR TANK-TYPETOILETS. .3.1 SHOWERHEADS SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM FLOW RATE OF NOT MORE THAN 1.8 GALLONS PER MINUTE AT 80 PSI. SHOWERHEADS SHALL BE CERTIFIED TO THE PERFORMANCECRITERIA OF THE U.S. EPA WATERSENSE SPECIFICATION FOR SHOWERHEADS. .4.1 THE MAXIMUM FLOW RATE OF RESIDENTIAL LAVATORY FAUCETS SHALL NOT EXCEED 1.2 GALLONS PER MINUTE AT 60 PSI. THE MINIMUM FLOW RATE OF RESIDENTIAL LAVATORYFAUCETS SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 0.8 GALLONS PER MINUTE AT 20 PSI. .4.2 THE MAXIMUM FLOW RATE OF LAVATORY FAUCETS INSTALLED IN COMMON AND PUBLIC USE AREAS (OUTSIDE OF DWELLINGS OR SLEEPING UNITS) IN RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGSSHALL NOT EXCEED 0.5 GALLONS PER MINUTE AT 60 PSI. .4.4 THE MAXIMUM FLOW RATE OF KITCHEN FAUCETS SHALL NOT EXCEED 1.8 GALLONS PER MINUTE AT 60 PSI. KITCHEN FAUCETS MAY TEMPORARILY INCREASE THE FLOW ABOVETHE MAXIMUM RATE, BUT NOT TO EXCEED 2.2 GALLONS PER MINUTE AT 60 PSI, AND MUSTDEFAULT TO A MAXIMUM FLOW RATE OF 1.8 GALLONS PER MINUTE AT 60 PSI. o 4.303.2: PLUMBING FIXTURES AND FITTINGS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE, AND SHALL MEET THE APPLICABLE STANDARDSREFERENCED IN TABLE 1701.1 OF THE CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE.

MECHANICAL NOTES

1. VENTILATION SHALL BE PROVIDED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE (CMC) CHAPTER 4. THE VENTILATION SYSTEM SHALL CONSIST OF AIRCONDITIONING, FURNACE WITH SUMMER SWITCH, OR OTHER INDEPENDENT FAN SYSTEM.OPERATION OF THE VENTILATION SYSTEM SHALL NOT RESULT IN INTERIOR NOISE LEVELSGREATER THAN 45 dB CNEL.

2.VACUUM BREAKERS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL HOSE BIBBS.

2. VACUUM BREAKERS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL HOSE BIBBS.3. FLOOR DRAINS OR SIMILAR TRAPS DIRECTLY CONNECTED TO THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM AND SUBJECT TO INFREQUENT USE SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH AN APPROVED AUTOMATICMEANS OF MAINTAINING THEIR WATER SEALS.

4. INSULATION MATERIAL SHALL MEET THE CALIFORNIA QUALITY STANDARDS PER ENERGY EFFICIENCY STANDARDS SEC. 118.

5. DOORS AND WINDOWS SHALL MEET THE MINIMUM INFILTRATION REQUIREMENTS PER ENERGY EFFICIENCY STANDARDS SEC. 116.

6. ALL PIPING AND DUCTWORK SHALL BE INSULATED CONSISTENT WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY STANDARDS SEC. 118, 123, 124 AND CMC TABLE 6-D ASAPPLICABLE.

7. ALL HVAC SYSTEMS SHALL MEET THE CONTROL REQUIREMENTS OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY STANDARDS SEC. 112, 122 AS APPLICABLE.

8. ALL HVAC EQUIPMENT AND APPLIANCES SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY STANDARDS SEC. 111, 115, 120-129 AS APPLICABLE.

9. SERVICE WATER HEATING SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT SHALL COMPLY WITH ENERGY EFFICIENCY STANDARDS SEC. 113.

10. MECHANICAL VENTILATION, WHEN REQUIRED IN RESIDENTIAL BATHROOMS AND LAUNDRY ROOMS AS APPLICABLE PER CBC SEC. 1203.3, SHALL PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FIVE AIRCHANGES PER HOUR AND BE ROUTED TO THE EXTERIOR.

11. BUILDING DRAIN AND VENT PIPING MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH CPC SEC. 701.0.12. WATER HEATERS SHALL BE ANCHORED OR STRAPPED TO RESIST HORIZONTAL DISPLACEMENTS DUE TO SEISMIC MOTION PER CPC SEC. 510.5.

13. COMPLIANCE WITH THE CITY WATER UTILITIES RETROFIT ORDINANCE:

A.ULTRA LOW FLUSH TOILETS THAT USE 1.28 GPF OR LESS.B.MAXIMUM FAUCET FLOW, 2.2 GALLONS PER MINUTE.C.MAXIMUM SHOWER HEAD FLOW, 2.5 GALLONS PER MINUTE.D.ALL SUPPLY TO BE COPPER U.N.O.

DRAWING SYMBOLS

MECHANICAL NOTE
TANKLESS WATER HEATER SPECS: ONE PER UNIT - ALL UNITS INSTANT GAS 1 GALLON 0.91 "NO PIPE INSULATION" 8GPM @ 43F RISE
HEATING / COOLING SYSTEMSPECS:SYSTEM TYPE MINI-SPLIT MULTI-ZONEHEATING TYPE SPLIT HEAT PUMP 9.10 HSPFCOOLING TYPE SPLIT HEAT PUMP 18.5 SEERHVAC DISTRIBUTION DUCTLESS / WITH FAN

KEYNOTES MASTER

NUMBER KEYNOTE
008 WASHING MACHINE009 DRYER010 REFRIGERATOR011 DISHWASHER012 RANGE WITH MICROWAVE ABOVE013 KITCHEN SINK014 MICROWAVE030 CORTEN STEEL PRIVACY WALL SEE SHEET TS-105031 SOLDIER AND PILE SITE WALL SEE SHEET TS-105037 FIRE HYDRANT038 SEWER LIFT STATION039 STREET LIGHT040 MAILBOX CLUSTER041 TRASH AND RECYCLING ENCLOSURE SEE SHEET TS-004 FOR DETAIL042 WATER METER043 SIDE WALK044 SINGLE CARPORT (ARIZONA WAVE 5000)045 DOUBLE CARPORT (ARIZONA WAVE DOUBLE CARPORT)047 SITE SIGN AND MONUMENT SEE SHEET TS-004 FOR DETAIL048 BMP PER CIVIL049 PLANTINGS AND GROUNDCOVER PER LANDSCAPING202 42" GLASS GUARDRAIL SYSTEM304 HVAC UNIT PER MECHANICAL305 HVAC AIR CONDENSOR PER MECHANICAL307 EXHAUST FAN SQUARE - LOW PROFILE347 TOILET348 TUB & SHOWER COMBO401 ROOF DRAIN803 IKEA GODMORGON / ODENSVIK 40" SINK CABINET WHITE (191.854.66) N10 NEW SITE DRAINAGE PER CIVILN23 NEW GAS METERS PER SDGEN40 NEW ELECTRICAL METER PER SDGE

PLAN NOTES - APPLICABLE TO ALL PLANS

1. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS.2. ALL AREA SEPARATION WALLS SHALL BE 5/8" TYPE 'X' GYP BD FROM FLOOR TO ROOF SHEATHING BOTH SIDES. TWO LAYERS WHERE APP.

3. PROVIDE DRYER VENT TO OUTSIDE AIR.4. ALL EXTERIOR WALLS SHALL HAVE R19 BATT INSULATION & ALL INTERIOR WALLS SHALL HAVE SOUND INSULATION (MIN R11 UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE)

5. INSULATE AROUND ALL PLUMBING PIPES PENETRATING STRUCTURAL MEMBERS, TYP.6. WATER HEATERS SHALL BE 18" MIN ABOVE FLOOR W/ T & P RELIEF VALVE TO OUTSIDE AIR & 'B' VENT THRU ROOF.

7. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ALL WALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF FINISH, ALL WINDOW & DOOR DIMENSIONS ARE TO FINISH SIZE (FRAME NOT INCLUDED)

8. ROUGH CARPENTER TO COORDINATE FRAMING LAYOUT W/ LIGHTING, PLUMBING & MECHANICAL AND INFORM THE OWNER & ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANICES. ALLREQUIRED FURRING, SOFFITS AND CEILING JOISTS SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BID.

9. USE 5/8" GYP BD ON WALLS (TYPICAL IN NON-WET AREAS).

10. USE 5/8" GREEN BOARD ON ALL NON-TILE AREAS IN THE PDWR & LAUNDRY ROOM WALLS.11. ALL WALLBOARD IN BATH ROOMS, TOILETS & SHOWER SHALL BE 1/2" THK 'DENS-SHIELD' MFR BY 'GP'.

12. ALL WALLBOARD BEHIND TILE IN ROOMS NOT LIMITED TO THE KITCHEN, BAR, GREAT ROOM & PWDR ROOM SHALL BE 1/2" THK 'DENS-SHIELD', TYP.

13. WATER CLOSET OR BIDET SHALL NOT BE SET CLOSER THAN FIFTEEN (15) INCHES FROM ITS CENTER TO ANY SIDE WALL OR OBSTRUCTION, NOR CLOSER THAN THIRTY (30) INCHESCENTER TO CENTER TO ANY SIMILAR FIXTURE. THE CLEAR SPACE IN FRONT OF ANYWATER CLOSET OR BIDET SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN TWENTY-FOUR (24) INCHES. [2016CPC, SEC. 407.5]

14. PER SEC 4.506.1 MECHANICAL EXHAUST FANS WHICH EXHAUST DIRECTLY FROM BATHROOMS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING:A) FANS SHALL BE ENERGY STAR COMPLIANT AND BE DUCTED TO TERMINATE OUTSIDETHE BUILDING.B). UNLESS FUNCTIONING AS A COMPONENT OF A WHOLE HOUSE VENTILATION SYSTEM,FANS MUST BE CONTROLLED BY A HUMIDISTAT WHICH IS READILY ACCESSIBLE.HUMIDSTAT CONTROLS SHALL BE CAPABLE OF ADJUSTMENT BETWEEN A RELATIVEHUMIDITY RANGE OF 50 TO 80 PERCENT.

15. EACH PLUMBING FIXTURE AND FITTING SHALL MEET REDUCED FLOW RATES SPECIFIED IN TABLE 4.303.2

16. PLUMBING FIXTURES (WATER CLOSETS AND URINALS) AND FITTINGS (FAUCETS AND SHOWERHEADS) SHALL MEET THE STANDARDS REFERENCED IN TABLE 4.303.3

17. HB = HOSE BIB18. GLAZING WITHIN A 24 INCH ARC OF EITHER SIDE OF DOORS, ADJACENT TO A WALKING SURFACE (GREATER THAN 9 SQUARE FEET. LESS THAN 18 INCHES FROM THE FLOOR ANDGREATER THAN 36 INCHES FROM THE FLOOR), ADJACENT TO A STAIR LANDING, INRAILINGS, ADJACENT TO A TUB OR SHOWER MUST BE OF SAFETY GLAZING MATERIAL.

19. GUARDS SHALL BE LOCATED ALONG OPEN-SIDED WALKING SURFACES, INCLUDING STAIRS, RAMPS AND LANDINGS THAT ARE LOCATED MORE THAN 30 INCHES MEASURED VERTICALLY TO THE FLOOR OR GRADE BELOW ANY POINT WITHIN 36 INCHES HORIZONTALLY TO THEEDGE OF THE OPEN SIDE.

20. PROVIDE AT LEAST ONE LAYER 5/8" GYPSUM BOARD APPLIED TO THE GARAGE CEILING FOR OCCUPANCY SEPARATION, WHERE BENEATH HABITABLE ROOMS SHALL BESEPARATED FROM ALL HABITABLE SPACE ABOVE BY NOT LESS THAN TWO LAYERS 5/8"TYPE X GYPSUM BOARD OR EQUIVALENT.

21. PROVIDE FIRE RESISTIVE CONSTRUCTION THAT EXTENDS TO INCLUDED ALL UNDERFLOOR AREAS TWO LAYERS TYPE X GYP 5/8"

22. ALL PARKING STALLS ARE ASSIGNED. VISITOR PARKING IS NOT PROVIDED.23. 1 ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL REQUIRED, 1 PROVIDED.24. PER SDMC 1109A.1 THROUGH 1109A.8 AND FIGURES 11A-2A, 11A-2B, 11A-2C: REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE SIGNAGE SHALL BE PROVIDED.

25. PER SDMC 1132A.1: THE FORCE FOR PUSHING OR PULLING OPEN A DOOR SHALL BE 5 POUNDS (22.2 N) MAXIMUM FOR SLIDING OR FOLDING DOORS.

26. FOOTINGS ON PROPERTY LINE SHALL NOT ENCROACH ON TO NEIGHBORING PROPERTY.27. WEST COAT AT ALL ROOF DECKS CAN BE SUBSTITUTED FOR CLASS A TORCH DOWN ROOFING WITH 20 YEAR WARRANTY. IF SUBSTITUTION IS MADE, COVER TORCH DOWNROOF WITH 1X6 IPE HARDWOOD DECKING ON TREX SLEEPERS RIPPED TO ROOF SLOPEFOR LEVEL DECKING SURFACE. USE STAINLESS STEEL SCREWS MIN 12" O.C. FORCONNECTION FROM IPE TO TREX. DECKING SYSTEM TO FLOAT OVER ROOFING.

28. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE FOR ALL REQUIRED DROPS IN CEILING TO ACCOMMODATE PLUMBING AND MECHANICAL WHERE APP.

ROOFING/WATERPROOFING NOTES

1. TYPICAL ROOFING SHALL BE JOHNS MANVILLE CLASS A BUILT UP ROOF'G OVER CRICKETS OR EQUAL (UL EXTERNAL FIRE RESISTANCE (UL 790)) (UL RATED ASSEMBLY TGFU.R10167)

2. TYPICAL WATERPROOF DECKING SHALL BE WESTCOAT ALX OR EQUAL. OWNER TO VERIFY FINISH. (UL EXTERNAL FIRE RESISTANCE (UL 790))

MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM
BI0-1.2 FINE GRADING AND TRENCHING OPERATIONSSHALL BE PERMITTED THROUGHOUT THE YEAR, PROVIDED THAT ALL TRACK-MOUNTED HEAVY EQUIPMENT SHALL BE MONITORED TO ENSURE THAT NOISE LEVELS DO NOT EXCEED A FREQUENCY OF 15 kHz. IF OPERATIONAL NOISE LEVELS POTENTIALLY EXCEED 15 kHz, OPERATIONS SHALL IMMEDIATLEY CEASE AND APPROPRIATE ACTION SHALL BE TAKEN (FOR EXAMPLE, SUBSTITUTION BY A SMALLER OR ALTERNATIVE MODEL) TO ENSURE THAT EQUIPMENT NOISE REMAINS BELOW 15 kHz.PERIPHERAL EQUIPMENT SUCH AS POWER GENERATORS SHALL BE MONITORED TO ENSURE THAT NOISE EMISSIONS DO NOT EXCEED A FREQUENCY OF 15 KHZ. IF SUCH EQUIPMENT EXCEEDS THIS LIMIT, THE DEVELOPER SHALL TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION SUCH AS WRAPPING THE EQUIPMENT IN A SOUND BLANKET OR SUBSTITUTING WITH ALTERNATE EQUIPMENT TO ENSURE THAT ULTRASOUND EMISSIONS MEASURED AT 50-FEET (15-METERS) DO NOT EXCEED THE 15 KHZ LIMIT.BI0-1.3 CONSTRUCTION-RELATED ON-SITE EQUIPMENT SERVICE AREAS SHALL BE SITUATED AS FAR AS POSSIBLE FROM THE SOUTH-FACING QUARRY WALL WHERE PFTB ROOST. THE SERVICE AREA SHALL BE SEPARATED BY A TEMPORARY 6-FOOT FENCE ALONG ITS NORTHERN EDGE COVERED WITH SOUND BLANKET MATERIAL. IF EQUIPMENT SERVICING IS REQUIRED AFTER SUNSET, ALL LIGHTING SHALL BE DIRECTED DOWNWARD AND MEASURES SHALL BE TAKEN TO ENSURE NO DIRECT LIGHTING IS AIMED TOWARD PFTB ROOSTING HABITAT, INCLUDING LIGHT FROM VEHICLES MOVED TO THE SERVICE AREA FOR MAINTENANCE. IF NECESSARY, A TEMPORARY COVER SHALL BE ERECTED TO MINIMIZE LIGHT SPILLAGE.BIO-1.4 CONSTRUCTION DURING THE PERIOD FROM APRIL 1 TO AUGUST 31, WHEN PFTB PUPS WOULD MOST LIKELY BE PRESENT AT A MATERNITY ROOST, SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO THE HOURS OF 7:00 AM TO 7:30 P.M. THESE LIMITS PROVIDE A MINIMUM ONE-HOUR BUFFER BETWEEN EXPECTED BAT ACTIVITY AND CONSTRUCTION, BOTH MORNING AND NIGHT. THIS WILL ENSURE THAT CONSTRUCTION DOES NOT BEGIN UNTIL AFTER ADULT BATS HAVE RETURNED TO THEIR ROOSTS FOLLOWING EARLY MORNING FORAGING AND BEFORE BATS DEPART THEIR ROOSTS TO BEGIN THEIR EVENING/NIGHTTIME FORAGING EXPEDITIONS.BIO-1.4 CONSTRUCTION DURING THE PERIOD FROM APRIL 1 TO AUGUST 31, WHEN PFTB PUPS WOULD MOST LIKELY BE PRESENT AT A MATERNITY ROOST, SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO THE HOURS OF 7:00 AM TO 7:30 P.M. THESE LIMITS PROVIDE A MINIMUM ONE-HOUR BUFFER BETWEEN EXPECTED BAT ACTIVITY AND CONSTRUCTION, BOTH MORNING AND NIGHT. THIS WILL ENSURE THAT CONSTRUCTION DOES NOT BEGIN UNTIL AFTER ADULT BATS HAVE RETURNED TO THEIR ROOSTS FOLLOWING EARLY MORNING FORAGING AND BEFORE BATS DEPART THEIR ROOSTS TO BEGIN THEIR EVENING/NIGHTTIME FORAGING EXPEDITIONS.BIO-1.5 EXTERIOR WINDOWS WITHIN ALL INDIVIDUAL UNITS AND HOA COMMUNITY FACILITIES SHALL BE DUALGLAZED, LOW "E" GRADE COATED WITH SUN COAST MAX OR SOLAR BAN. ALTHOUGH THESE COATINGS ARE DESIGNED FOR INTERIOR PROTECTION (I.E. TO LIMIT THE EFFECTS OF SUNLIGHT ENTERING A STRUCTURE), THE COATINGS WILL ALSO SERVE TO LIMIT THE AMOUNT OF LIGHT EMANATING FROM BUILDINGS AT NIGHT THAT COULD POSSIBLY ADVERSELY AFFECT ROOSTING AND EMERGING BATS.BIO-1.6 ALL EXTERIOR MOUNTED LIGHTING - INCLUDING SECURITY LIGHTS NEAR BUILDINGS, PATHWAY LIGHTING, AND LIGHTS ILLUMINATING PARKING AREAS - SHALL BE DOWN LIGHTED OR SHIELDED TO PREVENT ILLUMINATION OF THE SOUTH-FACING QUARRY WALL. IF NECESSARY TO MINIMIZE LIGHT SPILLAGE TOWARDS PTFB ROOST SITES, ESPECIALLY SECURITY LIGHT LOCATED ALONG THE NORTHERN EDGE OF THE PROJECT, LIGHT FIXTURES SHALL BE FIT WITH REFLECTIVE SHIELDS. USE OF LOW U-V LIGHTS IS RECOMMENDED AS THEY ARE LESS LIKELY TO ATTRACT INSECTS AND, CONSEQUENTLY, BATS.BIO-1.9.B A ONE- OR TWO-NIGHT PRESENCE/ABSENCE SURVEY SHALL BE PERFORMED DURING LATE APRIL/EARLY MAY (ONE NIGHT IF THE SPECIES IS DETECTED) DURING CONSTRUCTION IN ORDER TO COMPARE RESULTS WITH THE MOST CURRENT SURVEY (APRIL 28-30, 2017). THE BASELINE SURVEY ESTIMATED THE PRESENCE OF, AT A MINIMUM, BETWEEN 5 AND 10 INDIVIDUALS OF THE SPECIES RESIDING IN THE QUARRY AND FORAGING IN ITS VICINITY.BIO-3 MIGRATORY BIRD TREATY ACT PROVISIONS PRIOR TO ANY NON-NATIVE VEGETATION REMOVALS WITHIN THE OPEN SPACE AREA BETWEEN 1 FEBRUARY AND 31 AUGUST, A SURVEY MUST BE PERFORMED BY A QUALIFIED BIOLOGIST THAT DOCUMENTS THAT NO ACTIVELY NESTING MIGRATORY BIRDS WOULD BE AFFECTED. IF ACTIVE MIGRATORY BIRDS ARE DETECTED, AND AREA 300 FEET FROM THE NEST SHALL BE STAKED AND POSTED TO PROHIBIT ALL CLEARING, GRUBBING, AND CONSTRUCTION WORK WITHIN THE PERIMETER UNTIL THE QUALIFIED BIOLOGIST DETERMINES THAT THE NESTS ARE NO LONGER OCCUPIED WITH WRITTEN NOTIFICATION TO THE APPROVAL OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR.BI0-1.1 ROUGH GRADING OPERATIONS (REMOVAL AND RE-COMPACTION OF QUARRY FLOOR) SHALL ONLY OCCUR BETWEEN SEPTEMBER 1st AND MARCH 31st. THE PURPOSE OF RESTRICTING ROUGH GRADING TO THIS TIME IS TO ENSURE THAT IS A MATERNITY ROOST EXISTS ON THE SITE, THE BIRTHING AND REARING OF YOUNG BATS WILL NOT BE ADVERSLEY IMPACTED

Page 352 of 615 ends

N1
,854
,400
N1
,854
,400
Conc
MH
MH
Sign
Rocks
FH
DI
DI
Sign
Wall
Wall
Wall
MH
AC
Conc
AC
AC
733
.6
738
.3
577
.2
580
.5
652
.3
760
.1
581
.5
580
.7
573
.7
570
.8
568
.8
567
.2
567
.7
567
.6
564
.5
561
.3
574
.1
546
.6 547
.3
549
.3
548
.5
550 54 .7 7
.7
546
.4
546
.1
545
.7
545
.0
544
.9
545
.6
546
.8
546
.9
545
.8
569
.9
559
.7
552
.5
554
.5
570
.9
553
.3
569
.8
571
.3
572
.8
572
.8
610
.8
570
.9
573
.6
545
.8
545
.2
566
.8
569
.4
569
.3
577
.2
580
.5
652
.3
760
.8
761
.4
762
.5
51577
.70
52681
.60
54570
.57
590
600
610
620
630
640
650
660
670
680
580
5 7
0 690
700 710
720 730
740
750
760
660
670
680
690
700
710
720
730
580
590
600
6 1
0 630
640
650
620
560
570
580
590
5 5
0 550
560
570
560
pool
Drawn byReviewed by
1 D Project number
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:MEP:STRUCTURAL ENGINEER:Developer:

N.T.C. Development Inc.1380 El Cajon BLVD. Ste. 202El Cajon, CA 92020Phone: 619.593.2600 InDev + Design, INC © 2021 All Rights Reserved
Architect:

InDev+Design, Inc.2120 Columbia St.Suite 17 San Diego, CA 92101Phone: 858.231.9914 PROJECT ADDRESS:
8043 HIGH St.LA MESA, CA 91941

REVISIONS
Submittal DatePlan Date
TBD
DEC 2021
PROJECT STATUS:

AJB

ZS / CG

CANTERA-KISHOUSE
PROJECT # B19-319-324
TS-101
5/4/2022 1:59:58 PM

EXISTING SITEPLAN

CANTERA

SITE SURVEY BY

SAN-LO AERIAL SURVEYS
4879 VIEWRIDGE AVE. SAN DIEGO, CA 92123-1667
858-565-1024

AREA BREAKDOWN
SITE AREA = 8.51 ACRES (379,695 SQ. FT.)

LEGAL DESCRIPTION
APN: 499-010-02 & 499-010-03

REAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF LA MESA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

PORTION OF LOT 12 OF EX MISSION RANCHO OF SAN DIEGO. ACCORDING TO THE PARTITION MAP THEREOF MADE IN ACTION ENTITLED "JUAN M LUCO, ET AL VERSUS THE COMMERCIAL BANK OF SAN DIEGO, ET AL". S.C.C. NO 348 ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY CLERK OF SAN DIEGO. AND DEPICTED ON LICENSED SURVEY MAP NO 184 FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE

COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, IN THE CITY OF LA MESA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
NTS 2 VICINITY MAP
1" = 40'-0" 1 Existing Site

Page 353 of 615 ends

562' - 0"
570' - 0"
574' - 0"
576' - 0"
560' - 0"
558' - 0"
556' - 0"
554' - 0"
552' - 0"
550' - 0"
548' - 0"
600' - 0"
590' - 0"
580' - 0"
570' - 0"
580' - 0"
590' - 0"
600' - 0"
610' - 0"
580' - 0
5 "
90' - 0"
600' - 0
6 "
10' - 0
6 "
20' - 0
6 "
30' - 0"
640' - 0"
620' - 0"
610' - 0"
6 0
0' - 0"
590' - 0" 580' - 0"
570' - 0"
610' - 0"
590' - 0"
8294 HIGH ST.
#22 - A.1
A/U
8290 HIGH ST.
#1 - Bb.2
8288 HIGH ST.
#2 - Bb.3
8286 HIGH ST.
#3 - A.2
8282 HIGH ST.
#4 - Bb.1
8280 HIGH ST.
#5 - Bb.2
8276 HIGH ST.
#6 - Ba.3
8274 HIGH ST.
#7 - Bb.1
8272 HIGH ST.
#8 - Ba.2
8270 HIGH ST.
#9 - A.3
8268 HIGH ST.
#10 - C.2
8266 HIGH ST.
#11 - C.3
8262 HIGH ST.
#12 - A.1
8258 HIGH ST.
#13 - A.2
8256 HIGH ST.
#14 - C.1
8254 HIGH ST.
#15 - Bb.3
8248 HIGH ST.
#16 - C.2
8246 HIGH ST.
#17 - Bb.1
8242 HIGH ST.
#18 - Ba.2
8240 HIGH ST.
#19 - Ba.1
8238 HIGH ST.
#20 - C.3
8236 HIGH ST.
#21 - A.1
A/U
8234 HIGH ST.
#23 - A.1
A/U
8296 HIGH ST.
#24 - A.2
A/U
8292 HIGH ST.
#25 - C.1
8284 HIGH ST.
#26 - A.3
8278 HIGH ST.
#27 - A.1
8264 HIGH ST.
#28 - A.2
8260 HIGH ST.
#29 - A.3
8252 HIGH ST.
#30 - C.1
8250 HIGH ST.
#31 - C.2
8244 HIGH ST.
#32 - C.3

HIGH STREET
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
NEW 6" WATER MAIN

NEW SEWER MAIN
W
W
W
W
W
S
W
W
W
W
W
W
037
037
039
039
039
039
039
040
040
040
038
1 TS-103
1 TS-103
2 TS-103
2 TS-103
3 TS-103
3 TS-103
4 TS-103
4 TS-103
PL
PL
PL
PL
PL
PL
PL
PL
044
044
044
044
044
044
045
044
044
044
044
044
045
044
045
044
044
044
044
044
044
045
044
044
044
044

TRENCH DRAIN PER CIVIL

TRENCH DRAIN PER CIVIL
048 049
048 049
048 049
4 TS-104
047
305
305
305
305
305
305
305
305
305
305
305
305
305
305
305
305
305
305
305
305
305
305
305
305
305
305
305
N23
N23
N23
N23
N23
N23
N23
N23
N23
N23
N23
N23
N23
N23
N23
N23
N23
N23
N23
N23
N23
N23
N23
N23
N23
N23
N23
N23
N23
N23
N40
N40
N40
N40
N40
N40
N40
N40
N40
N40
N40
N40
N40
N40
N40
N40
N40
N40
N40
N40
N23
N40
N40
N40
N40
N40
N40
N40

ROAD & CURB

PER CIVIL

ROAD & CURB

PER CIVIL

ROAD & CURB

PER CIVIL
TS-105
5 030
031
031
031
031
031
031
031
031
031
030
030
030
030
TS-105
6 LOCATION OF

CONDENSER,

ELECTRICAL

METER AND GAS METER

PER CIVIL

LOCATION OF

CONDENSER,

ELECTRICAL

METER AND GAS METER

PER CIVIL

LOCATION OF

CONDENSER,

ELECTRICAL

METER AND GAS METER

PER CIVIL

ROUGH FACED CMU

10.99 10.88

16.82 15.1

18.72 21.75

18.48 9.68

21.69 9.48

6.52 11.86

10.9 20.88

10.69 10.91

22.69 10.56

10.76 16.61

17.99 11.27

11.73 21.75

10.56 10.48
100.22
245.89'
PL
PL
PL
215.35'

9.72 20.09
305
401
401
401
401
401
401
401
401
401
401
401
401
401
401
401
401
401
401
401
401
401
401
401
401
401
401
401
401
401
401
N40
N40
305
042
042
042
042042
042
042
042
042 042
042
042
042 042
042
042
042
042
042
042
042 042
042
042
042
042
042
042
042 042
042
042
042
042
N10
N10
N40
305
305
305
N40
N23
N40
N10
N10

TRAFFIC DIRECTION
SOLDER PILE WALL -HEIGHT VARIES PER CIVIL (~6'-8' HIGH) 041
SOLDER PILE WALL -HEIGHT VARIES PER CIVIL (~6'-8' HIGH) SOLDER PILE WALL -HEIGHT VARIES PER CIVIL (~6'-8' HIGH) SOLDER PILE WALL -HEIGHT VARIES PER CIVIL (~6'-8' HIGH) 041
041
041
041
041
041
041
041
041
041
041
041
041
041
041
041
041
041
041
041
041
041
041
041
041
041
041
041
041
041
041
041
7 TS-105
Drawn byReviewed by
1 D Project number
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:MEP:STRUCTURAL ENGINEER:Developer:

N.T.C. Development Inc.1380 El Cajon BLVD. Ste. 202El Cajon, CA 92020Phone: 619.593.2600 InDev + Design, INC © 2021 All Rights Reserved
Architect:

InDev+Design, Inc.2120 Columbia St.Suite 17 San Diego, CA 92101Phone: 858.231.9914 PROJECT ADDRESS:
8043 HIGH St.LA MESA, CA 91941

REVISIONS
Submittal DatePlan Date
TBD
DEC 2021
PROJECT STATUS:

AJB

ZS / CG

CANTERA-KISHOUSE
PROJECT # B19-319-324
TS-102
5/4/2022 2:00:33 PM

IMPROVEDSITE PLAN

CANTERA
1" = 20'-0" 1 Site Copy 1

KEYNOTES

NUMBER KEYNOTE
030 CORTEN STEEL PRIVACY WALL SEE SHEET TS-105031 SOLDIER AND PILE SITE WALL SEE SHEET TS-105037 FIRE HYDRANT038 SEWER LIFT STATION039 STREET LIGHT040 MAILBOX CLUSTER041 TRASH AND RECYCLING ENCLOSURE SEE SHEET TS-004 FOR DETAIL042 WATER METER044 SINGLE CARPORT (ARIZONA WAVE 5000)045 DOUBLE CARPORT (ARIZONA WAVE DOUBLE CARPORT) 047 SITE SIGN AND MONUMENT SEE SHEET TS-004 FOR DETAIL048 BMP PER CIVIL049 PLANTINGS AND GROUNDCOVER PER LANDSCAPING305 HVAC AIR CONDENSOR PER MECHANICAL401 ROOF DRAIN N10 NEW SITE DRAINAGE PER CIVILN23 NEW GAS METERS PER SDGEN40 NEW ELECTRICAL METER PER SDGE GENERAL SITE IMPROVEMENT NOTES:

SPECIFIC SITE IMPROVEMENT NOTES
1 ALL SITE WORK SHALL BE CAREFULLY COORDINATED BY CONTRACTOR WITH LOCAL UTILITY COMPANIES AND TELEPHONE COMPANY.2 CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL DIGALERT (800) 227-2600 AT LEAST 2 DAYS BEFORE DIGGING.3 CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE ALL UTILITY LINES AND COORDINATE CONNECTIONS.4 PAD AREA SHOWN IN APPROX. LOCATION, CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXACT LOCATIONS IN FIELD.5 CONTRACTOR SHALL GET OWNER APPROVAL OF BUILDING PAD LOCATION.6 CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE HARDSCAPE, LANDSCAPE & IRRIGATION DRAWINGS BETWEEN ARCHITECTURAL, STRUCTURAL & LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS.
7 ALL DRAINAGE SHALL DRAIN AWAY FROM THE STRUCTURE.8 ALL FINISHES AND FINISH MATERIALS SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE OWNER PRIOR TO ORDERING AND INSTALLATION. ALL FINISH WORK SHALL MEET OR EXCEED INDUSTRY STANDARDS.
9 CONCRETE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL DRAWINGS PERTAINING TO CONCRETE WORK AND NOTIFY THE OWNER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO STARTING WORK.
10 CONCRETE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL EXTERIOR FINISH PATTERNS, UTILITY CONNECTIONS, RECESSED AREAS, EXPANSION AND COLD JOINTS WITH THE ARCHITECTURAL, STRUCTURAL & LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS. 11 THE CONCRETE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE REQUIRED EXPANSION & CONTROL JOINTS FOR ALL FLATWORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH INDUSTRY STANDARDS.
12 NEW SIDEWALK PER CITY OF LA MESA13 SEWER CLEAN OUT REQUIRED14 SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR ALL GROUND COVER15 NEW WATER MAIN WORK TO BE COMPLETED UNDER R.O.W. PERMIT16 SEE CIVIL ENGINEERING DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING PAD ELEVATIONS A NO WORK PROPOSED IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY AS PART OF THIS BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.B NO PART OF STRUCTURES, RETAINING WALLS AND FOOTINGS SHALL ENCROACH INTO ADJACENT PROPERTIES, EASEMENTS OR PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY.

C PROPERTY OWNER SHALL MAINTAIN ALL DRAINAGE FACILITIES LOCATED WITHIN THE PARCEL AND BE RESPONSIBLE TO PREVENT DAMAGE TO DOWNSTREAM PROPERTIES.

D IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE APPLICANT TO LOCATE PROPERTY LINES AND CONFORM TO SET BACK REQUIREMENTS.

E PRIOR TO GARAGE FOUNDATION INSPECTION, DRIVEWAY SLOPES ARE TO BE INSPECTED BY THE ENGINEERING AND PLANNING DIVISIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH CITY OF LA MESA PARKING STANDARDS.

F CONTRACTOR TO HAVE A PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING WITH BUILDING, PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DIVISIONS PRIOR TO GRADING ACTIVITIES. CONTACT ENGINEERING DIVISION TO SETUP MEETING AT 619-667-1166.

G BOND AND FINAL OCCUPANCY PERMIT WILL BE RELEASED AFTER "AS-BUILT" PLANS FOR THE GRADING AND BUILDING SETS ARE PROVIDED.

H ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED ON FIELD SURVEY PERFORMED ON (10.05.2005) BY (SAN LO AERIAL SURVEYS).

I PROPERTY OWNERS TO MAINTAIN THE BACKWATER VALVE PER THE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.

J THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CLEANUP OF ALL SILT AND MUD ON ADJACENT STREETS DUE TO THE CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES OR ANY OTHER CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY, AT THE END OF EACH WORKDAY, OR AFTER A STORM EVENT THAT CAUSES ABREECH IN INSTALLED CONSTRUCTION BMP'S, WHICH MAY COMPROMISE STORM WATER QUALITY WITHIN ANY STREET. A STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT MAY BE REQUIRED TO PREVENT CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES OR EQUIPMENT FROM TRACKING MUD OR SILT INTOTHE STREET.

K ALL STOCKPILES OF SOIL AND OR BUILDING MATERIALS THAT ARE INTENDED TO BE LEFT FOR A PERIOD GREATER THAN SEVEN CALENDAR DAYS ARE TO BE COVERED. ALL REMOVABLE BMP DEVICES SHALL BE IN PLACE AT THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY WHENTHE FIVE-DAY RAIN PROBABILITY FORECAST EXCEEDS 40%.

L A CONCRETE WASHOUT SHALL BE PROVIDED ON ALL PROJECTS, WHICH PROPOSE THE CONSTRUCTION OF ANY CONCRETE IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE TO BE POURED IN PLACE ON SITE.

M THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL EROSION/SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES TO WORKING ORDER AFTER EACH RUN-OFF PRODUCING RAINFALL OR AFTER ANY MATERIAL BREACHES ITS EFFECTIVENESS.

N ALL SLOPES THAT ARE CREATED OR DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY MUST BE PROTECTED AGAINST EROSION AND SEDIMENT

TRANSPORT AT ALL TIMES

O THE STORAGE OF ALL CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL AND EQUIPMENT MUST BE PROTECTED AGAINST ANY POTENTIAL RELEASE OF POLLUTANTS INTO THE ENVIRONMENT.

P ALL EXISTING DRAINAGE INLETS TO BE PROTECTED DURING CONSTRUCTION, AND MEANS OF PROTECTION TO BE VISIBLE DURING INSPECTIONS.

Q PROVIDE SCREENING FOR MECHANIICAL EQUIPMENT AND ATTENUATE NOISE AS REQUIRED UNDER (LMMC 24.05.030.J) A SCREENING

DESIGN IS NOT REQUIRED AT THIS TIME

1. SEE NOTE SHEETS, CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND REQUIREMENTS.2. PRIOR TO POURING CONCRETE FOOTINGS, THE FOOTING AND FOUNDATION EXCAVATION SHALL BE INSPECTED BY THE, BUILDING INSPECTOR AND CONTRACTOR. IF ANY OF THE ABOVE PERSONNEL SUSPECTS FILL, EXPANSIVE SOILS OR ANY GEOLOGIC INSTABILITYBASED UPON OBSERVATION OF THE FOUNDATION EXCAVATION, ADDITIONAL SOILS TESTING AND RECOMMENOATIONS BY THE SOILSENGINEER SHALL BE REQUIRED. NOTIFY THE DESIGNER IN WRITING OF ANY SUSPECTED SOIL PROBLEMS IMMEDIATELY, AND PRIOR TOANY WORK OR ORDERING MATERIALS. COMPLY WITH ALL NOTES ON SHEET A-002 AND STRUCTURAL SET.

3. ALL FLATWORK: DRIVEWAYS, CONCRETE WALKWAYS, AND PATIOS SHALL COMPLY WITH FLATWORK REQUIREMENTS AS INDICATED ON FOUNDATION PLAN AND DRAWING NOTES.

4. FINISH GRADE THE SITE AFTER STRUCTURES AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS ARE INSTALLED, SUCH THAT SURFACE WATERS ARE DIRECTED AWAY FROM BUILDING FOUNDATIONS AND FILL SLOPES, TRENCH, VIA SURFACE SWALES AND OR UNDERGROUND DRAINS,TOWARD AND INTO APPROVED DRAINAGE WAYS. COMPLY WITH FOUNDATION PLAN NOTES AND STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS. THECONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE DESIGNER IN WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO ANY WORK OR ORDERING MATERIALS.

5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD SURVEY AND VERIFY EXACT LOCATIONS OF ALL PROPERTY LINES WITH RESPECT TO THE NEW PROPOSED WORK, TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH ALL REQUIRED SETBACKS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO FIELD SURVEY THEEXISTING GRADES AND TOPOGRAPHY WITH RESPECT TO THE NEW PROPOSED WORK TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH ALL REQUIREDHEIGHT=LIMITS. THIS SURVEY WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED FIRST, AND PRIOR TO ANY OTHER WORK AND PRIOR TO ORDERINGMATERIALS. IF ANY DISCREPANCIES WITH THE APPROVED PLANS ARE DISCOVERED, NOTIFY THE DESIGNER IMMEDIATELY.

6. VERIFY EXACT LOCATIONS OF ALL PROPERTY LINES, EASEMENTS, SETBACKS AND UTILITIES PRIOR TO ANY WORK.7. THE SAFETY OF FIELD PERSONNEL DURING CONSTRUCTION IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER IF HE CONSIDERS ANY OF THE RECOMMENDED ACTIONS CONTAINED HEREIN TO BE UNSAFE.

8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE EXISTENCE AND LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK OR ANY TRENCHING.

NOTICE OF THE PROPOSED WORK SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE APPLICABLE GAS, ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE, SEWER AND WATER AGENCIES.

9. THE PERMITEE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PREVENTION OF DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY. NO PERSON SHALL WORK ON LAND SO CLOSE TO THE PROPERTY LINE AS TO ENDANGER ANY ADJOINING PUBLIC STREET, SIDEWALK, OR ANY OTHER PUBLIC OR PRIVATEPROPERTY WITHOUT SUPPORTING AND PROTECTING SUCH PROPERTY FROM SETTLING, CRACKING, EROSION, SILTING, SCOUR, OROTHER DAMAGE WHICH MIGHT RESULT FROM THE WORK DESCRIBED ON THIS PLAN.

10. COORDINATE ALL SITE WORK, UTILITIES, ROUGH GRADING, FINISH GRADING, AND FLATWORK WITH THE CIVIL ENGINEER'S CONSTRUCTION PLANS UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE DESIGNER IN WRITING OF ANYDISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO ANY WORK OR ORDERING MATERIALS.

11. ALL UTILITY AND IRRIGATION TRENCHES SHALL BE RE-COMPACTED.12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A SEPARATE PERMIT FOR ALL CURB GUTTER AND SIDEWALK ON THE CITY RIGHT OF WAY. COMPLY AND COORDINATE THIS INFORMATION ON THE CIVIL CONSTRUCTION PLAN BY OTHERS.

13. ALL EXTERIOR "AT GRADE" STAIRS, STEPS, LANDINGS AND OTHER WALKING SURFACES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH A "SLIP RESISTANT FINISH, TYPICAL.

14. FOOTING DEPTHS SHALL COMPLY WITH "FOUNDATION PLAN NOTES I SOIL NOTES": FOUNDATIONS AND FOOTINGS FOR THE PROPOSED STRUCTURES THAT ARE LOCATED CLOSER THAN SEVEN (7) FEET TO THE TOP OF SLOPES SHALL BE DEEPENED SUCH THAT THEBOTTOM OF THE FOUNDATIONS ARE AT LEAST SEVEN (7) FEET BACK FROM THE FACE OF THE SLOPE. THIS MINIMUM FOOTING DEPTHREQUIREMENT SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER MINIMUM FOOTING DEPTHS INDICATED ON PLANS AND DETAILS.

15. WATER SERVICES AND SEWER LATERALS IF REQUIRED SHALL BE INSTALLED BY CITY CREWS. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL WORK WITH WORK BY CITY CREWS AND SHALL VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED UTILITY SERVICES.

16. EXISTING SERVICES NOT USED MUST BE KILLED AT THE MAIN.17. SEE CIVIL SHEETS FOR ALL ELEVATIONS, TOPOGRAPHY, AND GRADE SLOPES18. BUILDING PLANS SHALL COMPLY WITH CURRENTLY ADOPTED CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE AND ALL APPROVED CITY ORDINANCES19. ALL FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADWAYS MUST BE MAINTAINED UNOBSTRUCTED AND DRIVABLE BY FIRE APPARATUS THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS. FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS AND WATER SUPPLY SHALL BE INSTALLED AS DIRECTED AND SHALL BEINSPECTED AND APPROVED PRIOR TO DELIVERY OF COMBUSTIBLE MATERIAL TO THE SITE. ACCESS ROADWAYS SHALL BE CAPABLE OFHOLDING AN IMPOSED LOAD OF 75,000 POUNDS, INCLUDING DURING ADVERSE WEATHER CONDITIONS. 20 ADDRESS NUMBERS ARE REQUIRED TO BE INSTALLED OR PAINTED ON THE FRONT OF EACH UNIT, NUMBERS OR LETTERS SHALL BE A

MINIMUM OF FOUR INCHES IN HEIGHT AND PLACED ON A CONTRASTING BACKGROUND *NOTE :VERIFY BUILDING PAD HEIGHTS WITH CIVIL

Page 354 of 615 ends

037
039
043
044
044
045
044 044
044
VERIFY T.O.W. PER CIVIL
VERIFY T.O.W. PER CIVIL
VERIFY T.O.W. PER CIVIL

ELEVATION OF BUILDING PAD PER CIVIL
N23
037
044
045 044
044 044
VERIFY T.O.W. PER CIVIL
VERIFY T.O.W. PER CIVIL

ELEVATION OF BUILDING PAD PER CIVIL
N40 305
N40
305
039

HIGH ST
043
044
044 045
044 044
VERIFY T.O.W. PER CIVIL
VERIFY T.O.W. PER CIVIL
VERIFY T.O.W. PER CIVIL

ELEVATION OF BUILDING PAD PER CIVIL
N23
N40
562' - 6"

HIGH ST
043
037
039
037
039
VERIFY VERIFY T.O.W. PER CIVIL
VERIFY T.O.W. PER CIVIL
VERIFY T.O.W. PER CIVIL
305
305
047

ELEVATION OF BUILDING PAD PER CIVIL
N40
N23
044
044
044
044
564' - 5"
Drawn byReviewed by
1 D Project number
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:MEP:STRUCTURAL ENGINEER:Developer:

InDev+Design, Inc.2120 Columbia St.Suite 17 San Diego, CA 92101Phone: 858.231.9914 PROJECT ADDRESS:
8043 HIGH St.LA MESA, CA 91941

REVISIONS
Submittal DatePlan Date
TBD
DEC 2021
PROJECT STATUS:

AJB

ZS / CG

CANTERA-KISHOUSE
PROJECT # B19-319-324
TS-103
5/4/2022 2:01:09 PM

SITESECTIONS

CANTERA
1/16" = 1'-0" 1 Site Section 11/16" = 1'-0" 2 Site Section 21/16" = 1'-0" 3 Site Section 31/16" = 1'-0" 4 Site Section 4

KEYNOTES

NUMBER KEYNOTE
037 FIRE HYDRANT039 STREET LIGHT043 SIDE WALK044 SINGLE CARPORT (ARIZONA WAVE 5000)045 DOUBLE CARPORT (ARIZONA WAVE DOUBLE CARPORT)047 SITE SIGN AND MONUMENT SEE SHEET TS-004 FOR DETAIL
305 HVAC AIR CONDENSOR PER MECHANICAL
N23 NEW GAS METERS PER SDGEN40 NEW ELECTRICAL METER PER SDGE

Page 355 of 615 ends

4 1/4" 3 1/4" 4 1/4" 3 1/4" 4 1/4" 3 1/4" 4 1/4" 3 1/4" 4 1/4" 3 1/4" 4 1/4" 3 1/4" 4 1/4" 3 1/4" 4 1/4" 3 1/4" 1 1/2" 1 1/2" 1 1/2" 1 1/2" 1 1/2" 1 1/2" 1 1/2" 1 1/2" 1 1/2" 1 1/2" 1 1/2" 1 1/2" 1 1/2" 1 1/2" 1 1/2" 1 1/2" 2'-0" 2'-0"
4'-0"
1'-6"
1'-0"
8" THICK

MONOLITHIC

CONCRETE

CORTEN STEEL CUTOUT
X2 UP LIGHT FOR

MONUMENT
5'-0"
*NOTE:VERIFY SIZE WITH OWNER BEFORE INSTALATION
2 TS-104
3 TS-104 SEE SITE PLAN FOR LOCATION

SWING OUT DOOR

CORTEN STEEL

TRASH RECYCLING
2'-9"
7'-6"
2'-6" 2'-6" 2'-6"

GREEN WASTE
/ ORGANICS
2'-5 1/2"

SWING OUT DOOR

SEE SITE PLAN FOR LOCATION

SWING OUT DOOR

CORTEN STEEL

TRASH RECYCLING
2'-9"
2'-6" 2'-6"
2'-5 1/2"

SEE SITE PLAN FOR LOCATION

SWING OUT DOOR

CORTEN STEEL
2'-9"
2'-6"

GREEN WASTE
/ ORGANICS
2'-5 1/2"
5'-0"
3 TS-104

SWING OUT DOOR SWING OUT DOOR
*NO ROOF

CORTEN STEEL CORTEN STEEL
7'-6"
2'-6" 2'-6" 2'-6"
4'-0" CORTEN STEEL

SWING OUT DOOR SWING OUT DOOR SWING OUT DOOR
*NO ROOF

CORTEN STEEL CORTEN STEEL

SWING OUT DOOR
*NO ROOFCORTEN STEEL
*NO ROOF

CORTEN STEEL
4'-0"

SWING OUT DOOR
2'-5 1/2" 2'-9"
Drawn byReviewed by
1 D Project number
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:MEP:STRUCTURAL ENGINEER:Developer:

InDev+Design, Inc.2120 Columbia St.Suite 17 San Diego, CA 92101Phone: 858.231.9914 PROJECT ADDRESS:
8043 HIGH St.LA MESA, CA 91941

REVISIONS
Submittal DatePlan Date
TBD
DEC 2021
PROJECT STATUS:

AJB

ZS / CG

CANTERA-KISHOUSE
PROJECT # B19-319-324
TS-104
5/4/2022 2:01:16 PM

SITEELEMENTS

CANTERA
1" = 1'-0" 4 SITE MONUMENT
ARIZONA WAVE 5000 - CURVED CARPORT
ARIZONA WAVE 5000 - CURVED DOUBLE CARPORT

PRE-FAB BASEMENT
= SL2
= SL2
3/4" = 1'-0" 1 TRASH ENCLOSURE3/4" = 1'-0" 2 TRASH ENCLOSURE FRONT 3/4" = 1'-0" 3 TRASH ENCLOSURE SIDE VAULT USED IN PROJECT NOT ON LISTVAULT SPECS.INT. SIZEL= 10'W= 8'H= 7'EXT. SIZEL= 11'-4"W= 9'-4"H= 8'-4"

ENCLOSURE FOR

GREEN WASTE / ORGANICS

ENCLOSURE FOR

TRASH & RECYCLING

ENCLOSURE FOR

TRASH, RECYCLING &

GREEN WASTE / ORGANICS

Page 356 of 615 ends

8294 HIGH ST. UNIT #22 TYPE A.1
8290 HIGH ST.

UNIT #1
TYPE Bb.2
8288 HIGH ST.

UNIT #2
TYPE Bb.3
8286 HIGH ST.

UNIT #3
TYPE A.2
8282 HIGH ST.

UNIT #4
TYPE Bb.1
8280 HIGH ST.

UNIT #5
TYPE Bb.2
8276 HIGH ST. UNIT #6
TYPE Ba.3
8274
HIGH
ST.

UNIT
#7
TYPE
Bb.
1 8272
HIGH
ST.

UNIT
#8
TYPE
Ba.
2 8270 HIGH ST. UNIT #9 TYPE A.3
8268 HIGH ST. UNIT #10 TYPE C.2
8266 HIGH ST. UNIT #11 TYPE C.3
8262 HIGH ST. UNIT #12 TYPE A.1
8258 HIGH ST. UNIT #13 TYPE A.2
8256 HIGH ST. UNIT #14
TYPE C.1
8254 HIGH ST. UNIT #15
TYPE Bb.3
8248 HIGH ST. UNIT #16
TYPE C.2
8240 HIGH ST. UNIT #19 TYPE Ba.1
8238
HIGH
ST
.

UNIT
#20
TYPE
C
.3
8236 HIGH ST
.

UNIT #21 TYPE A.1
8234 HIGH ST
.

UNIT #23 TYPE A.1
8296 HIGH ST
.

UNIT #24 TYPE A.2
8292 HIGH ST. UNIT # TYP 25 E C.1
8284 HIGH ST.

UNIT #26
TYPE A.3
8278 HIGH ST.

UNIT #27
TYPE A.1
8252 HIGH ST.

UNIT #30
TYPE C.1
8250 HIGH ST. UNIT #31
TYPE C.2
8244 HIGH ST.

UNIT #32
TYPE C.3
SL1
SL1
SL1
SL1
SL1
SL1
8246 HIGH ST. UNIT #17
TYPE Bb.1
8242 HIGH ST. UNIT #18
TYPE Ba.2
8264 HIGH ST. UNIT #28 TYPE A.2
8260 HIGH ST. UNIT #29 TYPE A.3
SF1
SF1
SF1
SF1
SF1.1
SF1.1
SF1.1
SF2
SF2
SF2 SF2 SF2 SF2
SF2
SF2
SF2
SF2
SF2
SF2
SF2
SF2
SF2
SF2
SF2
SF2
SF2
SF2
SF2
SF2
SF2
SF2
SF2 SF1 = FRONT PRIVACY WALL SF2 = SOLDIER PILE WALL
SL1 = STREET LIGHTSSL2 = ENTRY MONUMENT LIGHT
SL2
*SEE TS-104 PAGE FOR SPECS
NN
1'
-
10 1/4"

INTERIOR AREA PROVIDED
= 9,246 SF

PEREMITER AREA PROVIDED
= 26,326 SF

TOTAL AREA PROVIDED
= 35,572 SF
AREA REQUIRED:
500 SF PER FIRST 10 UNITS = 5,000 SF
400 SF PER SECOND 10 UNITS = 4,000 SF
300 SF PER 21+ UNITS = (12UNITS x 300SF) = 3,600 SF

TOTAL LANDSCAPED AREA AND COMMUNITY
OUTDOOR REQUIRED= 12,600 SF
8294 HIGH ST. UNIT #22 TYPE A.1
8290 HIGH ST.

UNIT #1
TYPE Bb.2
8288 HIGH ST.

UNIT #2
TYPE Bb.3
8286 HIGH ST.

UNIT #3
TYPE A.2
8282 HIGH ST.

UNIT #4
TYPE Bb.1
8280 HIGH ST.

UNIT #5
TYPE Bb.2
8276 HIGH ST. UNIT #6
TYPE Ba.3
8274
HIGH
ST.

UNIT
#7
TYPE
Bb.
1 8272
HIGH
ST.

UNIT
#20
TYPE
C
.3
8236 HIGH ST
.

UNIT #21 TYPE A.1
8234 HIGH ST
.

UNIT #23 TYPE A.1
8296 HIGH ST
.

UNIT #24 TYPE A.2
8292 HIGH ST. UNIT TYP #25 E C.1
8284 HIGH ST.

UNIT #26
TYPE A.3
8278 HIGH ST.

UNIT #27
TYPE A.1
8252 HIGH ST.

UNIT #30
TYPE C.1
8250 HIGH ST. UNIT #31
TYPE C.2
8244 HIGH ST.

UNIT #32
TYPE C.3
8246 HIGH ST. UNIT #17
TYPE Bb.1
8242 HIGH ST. UNIT #18
TYPE Ba.2
8264 HIGH ST. UNIT #28 TYPE A.2
8260 HIGH ST. UNIT #29 TYPE A.3
4'-9" 2'-0"
3"
4'-3"
3"
STEEL 4x4
POST

SPLITFACED CMU WALL

PER CIVIL
CORTEN STEEL PLATES 4'-0"
4'-3"
562' - 3"

SPLITFACED CMU WALL

PER CIVIL AND

LANDSCAPING PLAN
6'-9"
6'-6"
555' - 6"

VERIFY HEIGHTS PER
CIVIL
~
~
~
~
4x12
NOTE: NON STRUCTURAL

PRIVACY SAFTEY FENCE
4x124x124x12

STEEL PILES TREATED WOOD

VERIFY WALL HEIGHT PER CIVIL
4x124x124x12
8' MAX FROM GRADE
31 2
/
"
STEEL 4x4 POST

CORTEN STEEL PLATES
9'-4" 18'-0"
~ 567' - 6"
~ 562' - 9"
~ 560' - 3"
~ 561' - 6"
~ 558' - 0"
~ 565' - 9"
~ 562' - 0"
~ 560' - 0"
~ 560' - 0"
~ 558' - 9"
~ 558' - 0"
~ 556' - 0"
~ 564' - 5" ~ 565' - 4" ~ 568' - 1"

BOTTOM OF WALL INTERIOR GRADE LINE

TOW TOW TOW TOW TOW

INT - BW INT - BW INT - BW INT - BW INT - BW

EXT - BW

EXT - BW EXT - BW

EXT - BW BOTTOM OF WALL EXTERIOR GRADE LINE
4'-0"
3'-0"
3'-0"
4'-0"
*NOTE : VERIFY ALL HEIGHTS WITH CIVIL
Drawn byReviewed by
1 D Project number
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:MEP:STRUCTURAL ENGINEER:Developer:

InDev+Design, Inc.2120 Columbia St.Suite 17 San Diego, CA 92101Phone: 858.231.9914 PROJECT ADDRESS:
8043 HIGH St.LA MESA, CA 91941

REVISIONS
Submittal DatePlan Date
TBD
DEC 2021
PROJECT STATUS:

AJB

ZS / CG

CANTERA-KISHOUSE
PROJECT # B19-319-324
TS-105
5/5/2022 1:58:14 PM

OPEN SPACEPLAN & SITEELEMENTS

CANTERA
1" = 30'-0" 1 SITE WALL & LIGHTING PLAN 1" = 30'-0" 2 OPEN SPACE PLAN 3/8" = 1'-0" 3 FRONT PRIVACY WALL 3/8" = 1'-0" 4 = SF1 SOLDIER PILE WALL = SF2 = SL1
1/16" = 1'-0" 7 FRONT PRIVACY WALL = SF1.1

Page 357 of 615 ends

UP
Stacked
W/D
DN
18' - 11 7/8"
4' - 3 7/8" 10' - 4 1/8" 4' - 3 7/8"
30' - 7 7/8"
4' - 3 7/8" 8' - 4 1/8" 6' - 3 7/8"
2' - 2"
3' - 1" 6' - 8"
1' - 10 1/2"
9' - 9" 20' - 11"
A-1
AA
A-3
AG
A-2

KITCHEN

LIVING / DINING
18' - 11 7/8"
1 A-301
1 A-301
2 A-301
2 A-301
3 A-301
3 A-301
4 A-301
4 A-301
304
NOTE: SEE CIVIL AND SITE PLAN FOR LOCATIONS OF GAS METER, ELECTRICAL METER, AND HVAC CONDENSER 012
010
011
803
347
008009
NOTE:

LOCATION OF
OPTIONAL NONHABITABLE

STORAGE

BASEMENT
ACCESS
202
013
1'-4 1/4" 1'-4 1/4"
SHELF
AE AC
A-9
18' - 11 7/8"
4' - 3 7/8" 8' - 4 1/8" 6' - 3 7/8"
30' - 7 7/8"
2' - 2" 2' - 2" 11' - 5 1/2" 14' - 10 1/2"
7' - 5 1/2" 4' - 0" 1' - 9" 5' - 5 1/2" 7' - 2 1/2"
14' - 2 1/4" 3' - 7 3/4"
9' - 7 1/2" 21' - 0 1/2" A-5 A-7
A-4
A-6
BEDROOM 1
BEDROOM 2
CLST.
4' - 3 7/8" 10' - 4 1/8" 4' - 3 7/8"
18' - 11 7/8"
1 A-301
1 A-301
2 A-301
2 A-301
3 A-301
3 A-301
4 A-301
4 A-301
30' - 7 7/8"
304
304
2'-0"
A-8
348
347
803
AI AK
AO AM
AQ
1/4" SLOPE TO
DRAIN
SLOPE AND DRAIN LOCATION DEPENDENT ON SLOPE OF SITESEE SITE PLAN TS-102 THUNDERBIRD PRODUCTS:MOTTOM OUTLET ROOF DRAIN WITH OVERFLOW Drawn byReviewed by
1 D Project number
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:MEP:STRUCTURAL ENGINEER:Developer:

InDev+Design, Inc.2120 Columbia St.Suite 17 San Diego, CA 92101Phone: 858.231.9914 PROJECT ADDRESS:
8043 HIGH St.LA MESA, CA 91941

REVISIONS
Submittal DatePlan Date
TBD
DEC 2021
PROJECT STATUS:

AJB

ZS / CG

CANTERA-KISHOUSE
PROJECT # B19-319-324
A-101
5/4/2022 1:58:03 PM

UNIT A FLOORPLAN

CANTERA
3/8" = 1'-0" 1 UNIT-A LEVEL 1 - 557.40 sf 3/8" = 1'-0" 2 UNIT-A LEVEL 2 - 455.30 sf.

UNIT A - 1013 SF
1/4" = 1'-0" 3 UNIT-A ROOF

KEYNOTES

NUMBER KEYNOTE
008 WASHING MACHINE009 DRYER010 REFRIGERATOR011 DISHWASHER012 RANGE WITH MICROWAVE ABOVE013 KITCHEN SINK202 42" GLASS GUARDRAIL SYSTEM304 HVAC UNIT PER MECHANICAL347 TOILET348 TUB & SHOWER COMBO803 IKEA GODMORGON / ODENSVIK 40" SINK CABINET WHITE (191.854.66)

DIMENSIONING NOTES
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED - FRAME WALLS• EXTERIOR WALLS = 2x6• INTERIOR WALLS = 2x4• PLUMBING WALLS = 2x6• ALL DIMENSIONS TO FACE OF STUD (FOS)• ALL OUTER/ EXTERIOR GRID LINES TO EDGE OF

STRUCTURE
• ALL OTHER GRID LINES ARE EDGE OF STRUCTURE

GENERAL FLOOR PLAN NOTES

1. SMOKE DETECTORS AND CARBON MONOXIDE ALARMS SHALL BE INTERCONNECTED AND SOUND AN ALARM AUDIBLE IN ALL SLEEPING AREAS AND SHALL BE I.C.B.O. APPROVED. ALL ALARMS TO BE INTERCONNECTED AND BE PROVIDED WITH BATTERY BACK-UP. ALL ALARMS TO BE IN FULL COMPLIANCE WITH SECTIONS 420.5 AND 420.6. SEE ELECTRICAL PLANS FOR LOCATIONS OF DETECTORS AND ALARMS.

2. ENTRANCE DOORS SHALL BE TIGHT FITTING TO THE FRAME AND SILL.3. FIRE AND/OR SMOKE DAMPER ASSEMBLIES, INCLUDING SLEEVES, AND INSTALLATION PROCEDURES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.

4. ACCESS TO FIRE AND SMOKE DAMPERS, LARGE ENOUGH TO PERMIT INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE DAMPER AND ITS OPERATING PARTS, SHALL BE PROVIDED. THE ACCESS SHALL NOT AFFECT THE INTEGRITY, NOR REDUCE THE FIRE-RESISTANCE RATING OF THE FIRE-RESISTANCE-RATED ASSEMBLIES. ACCESS POINTS SHALL BE PERMANENTLY IDENTIFIED ON THE EXTERIOR BY A LABEL HAVING LETTERS NOT LESS THAN 0.5" IN HEIGHT READING: FIRE/SMOKE DAMPER, SMOKE DAMPER OR FIRE DAMPER. ACCESS DOORS IN DUCTS SHALL BE TIGHT FITTING AND SUITABLE FOR THE REQUIRED DUCT CONSTRUCTION. [SEC. 717.4]

5. SLOPE AWAY FROM INTERIOR SURFACE AT EACH ENTRY DOOR6. ALL ROOF DRAINS TO EMPTY INTO PLANTER AND FEED INTO BIO BASIN

Page 358 of 615 ends

UP
DN
Stacked
W/D
B-1
BC
B-3
B-4
41' - 7 7/8"
2' - 2" 13' - 5 1/8" 6' - 9 3/8" 3' - 5" 13' - 8 1/2" 2' - 2" 19' - 11 7/8"
6' - 9 7/8" 10' - 5 1/8" 2' - 8 7/8"
19' - 11 7/8"
2' - 8 7/8" 10' - 5 1/8" 6' - 9 7/8"
18' - 9 7/8"
9' - 7 3/4" 9' - 2 1/8"DINING KITCHEN
ENTRY
LIVING
ROOM
BA
A-102
B
Sim
1 A-302
1 A-302
2 A-302
2 A-302
3 A-302
3 A-302
4 A-302
4 A-302
304 304
NOTE: SEE CIVIL AND SITE PLAN FOR LOCATIONS OF GAS METER, ELECTRICAL METER, AND HVAC CONDENSER 012
013
010
803347
BN
BH
BF BL
BJ
NOTE:

LOCATION OF
OPTIONAL NONHABITABLE

STORAGE

BASEMENT
ACCESS
B-11
B-9
BS
B-8
B-7
B-10
B-6
B-5
BT
41' - 7 7/8"
2' - 2" 2' - 2"
19' - 11 7/8"
19' - 11 7/8"
2' - 8 7/8" 10' - 5 1/8" 6' - 9 7/8"
41' - 7 7/8"
15' - 7" 6' - 9 1/2" 19' - 3 3/8"
8' - 5 1/8" 5' - 0" 7' - 0 7/8" 8' - 1 1/2" 9' - 0"
5' - 7 1/2" 13' - 2 1/2" M. CLST.

MASTER
MASTER BEDROOM 1
BEDROOM 2
1 A-302
1 A-302
2 A-302
2 A-302
3 A-302
3 A-302
4 A-302
4 A-302
304 304
2'-0"
Z-13
PATIO

GLASS GUARDRAIL
17 sf
348 348
347
803 803 347
008
202
009
202
202
SHELF
SHELF
4"
BU
BW
BY
BR
BP
ALT
ENTRY
BJ
B-12
B-13
304
SLOPE AND DRAIN LOCATION DEPENDENT ON SLOPE OF SITESEE SITE PLAN TS-102 1/4" SLOPE TO DRAIN THUNDERBIRD PRODUCTS:MOTTOM OUTLET ROOF DRAIN WITH OVERFLOW Drawn byReviewed by
1 D Project number
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:MEP:STRUCTURAL ENGINEER:Developer:

InDev+Design, Inc.2120 Columbia St.Suite 17 San Diego, CA 92101Phone: 858.231.9914 PROJECT ADDRESS:
8043 HIGH St.LA MESA, CA 91941

REVISIONS
Submittal DatePlan Date
TBD
DEC 2021
PROJECT STATUS:

AJB

ZS / CG

CANTERA-KISHOUSE
PROJECT # B19-319-324
A-102
5/4/2022 1:58:10 PM

UNIT B FLOORPLAN

CANTERA
3/8" = 1'-0" 1 UNIT-B LEVEL 1 - 797.80 sf.3/8" = 1'-0" 2 UNIT-B LEVEL 2 - 669.40 sf. 3/8" = 1'-0" B UNIT-B LEVEL 1 (Alt Option B)
UNIT B - 1467 SF
1/4" = 1'-0" 3 UNIT-B ROOF

KEYNOTES

NUMBER KEYNOTE
008 WASHING MACHINE009 DRYER010 REFRIGERATOR012 RANGE WITH MICROWAVE ABOVE013 KITCHEN SINK202 42" GLASS GUARDRAIL SYSTEM304 HVAC UNIT PER MECHANICAL347 TOILET348 TUB & SHOWER COMBO803 IKEA GODMORGON / ODENSVIK 40" SINK CABINET WHITE (191.854.66)

STRUCTURE
• ALL OTHER GRID LINES ARE EDGE OF STRUCTURE

GENERAL FLOOR PLAN NOTES

5. SLOPE AWAY FROM INTERIOR SURFACE AT EACH ENTRY DOOR6. ALL ROOF DRAINS TO EMPTY INTO PLANTER AND FEED INTO BIO BASIN

Page 359 of 615 ends

Stacked
W/D
UP
DN
22' - 11 7/8"
4' - 7 7/8" 13' - 8 1/8" 4' - 7 7/8"
22' - 11 7/8"
2' - 2"
31' - 11 7/8"
9' - 7 7/8" 7' - 0 1/8" 6' - 3 7/8"
C-4
20' - 8"
2' - 2"
31' - 11 7/8"
8' - 7" 3' - 0 3/8" 18' - 2 3/4" 9' - 6 3/4" 6' - 10 1/4" 5' - 5" C-3 C-1
C-2
CA

KITCHEN

LIVING ROOM
DINING
ENTRY
1 A-303
1 A-303
3 A-303
2 A-303
2 A-303
4 A-303
304
304
NOTE: SEE CIVIL AND SITE PLAN FOR LOCATIONS OF GAS METER, ELECTRICAL METER, AND HVAC CONDENSER 013
010
012
008009
803
347
348

CJ CH CF CD
NOTE: LOCATION OF

OPTIONAL NON-HABITABLE

STORAGE BASEMENT ACCESS
22' - 11 7/8"
4' - 7 7/8" 13' - 8 1/8" 4' - 7 7/8"
2' - 2"
22' - 11 7/8"
9' - 7 7/8" 7' - 0 1/8" 6' - 3 7/8"
2' - 2" 2' - 2"
31' - 11 7/8"
12' - 6" 2' - 4" 12' - 10"
9' - 2" 5' - 6" 2' - 4" 12' - 10" C-9 C-10 C-7 C-8 C-11 C-12 CK CM
BEDROOM 1 BEDROOM 2
BEDROOM 3 /

OFFICE / DEN

ART SHELF
1 A-303
1 A-303
3 A-303
2 A-303
2 A-303
4 A-303
304
304 304
C-13
803
347
348
202

CABINET

SHELF BELOW

CV CT CR CP
SLOPE AND DRAIN LOCATION DEPENDENT ON SLOPE OF SITESEE SITE PLAN TS-102 1/4" SLOPE TO
DRAIN
THUNDERBIRD PRODUCTS:MOTTOM OUTLET ROOF DRAIN WITH OVERFLOW Drawn byReviewed by
1 D Project number
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:MEP:STRUCTURAL ENGINEER:Developer:

InDev+Design, Inc.2120 Columbia St.Suite 17 San Diego, CA 92101Phone: 858.231.9914 PROJECT ADDRESS:
8043 HIGH St.LA MESA, CA 91941

REVISIONS
Submittal DatePlan Date
TBD
DEC 2021
PROJECT STATUS:

AJB

ZS / CG

CANTERA-KISHOUSE
PROJECT # B19-319-324
A-103
5/4/2022 1:58:15 PM

UNIT C FLOORPLAN

CANTERA
3/8" = 1'-0" 1 UNIT-C LEVEL 1 - 701.40 sf. 3/8" = 1'-0" 2 UNIT-C LEVEL 2 - 562.40 sf.

UNIT C - 1263 SF
1/4" = 1'-0" 3 UNIT-C ROOF

KEYNOTES

STRUCTURE
• ALL OTHER GRID LINES ARE EDGE OF STRUCTURE

GENERAL FLOOR PLAN NOTES

5. SLOPE AWAY FROM INTERIOR SURFACE AT EACH ENTRY DOOR6. ALL ROOF DRAINS TO EMPTY INTO PLANTER AND FEED INTO BIO BASIN SHELF

Page 360 of 615 ends

L
L LLL
L
L L
J
L
S/C
L
L
LL
J
J
S
S
S/C
I
J
L
S
C
S/C
AA
A-1
A-2
A-9
A-3
AG 304
307
307
3 UP TO
ABOVE
3 3

DOWN TO
ABOVE
AI
AK
A-4
A-5
A-6
A-7
AQ
AO
AM
A-8
304
304
307
3 DOWN TO
BELOW

INCANDESCENT CAN LIGHTJ BOX RECEPTICLE FOR CEILING FAN & LIGHT LED CAN LIGHTSMOKE ALARMCARBON MONOXIDE ALARMSMOKE & CARBON MONOXIDE ALARM COMBO 3 STRIP LIGHTVANITY LIGHT ABOVE SINK1 GANG SWITCH3 WAY SWITCH2 GANG SWITCH3 GANG SWITCH

EXHAUST FAN OUTDOOR WALL LIGHT
Drawn byReviewed by
1 A Project number
STRUCTURAL ENG:MEP:GENERAL CONTRACTOR:OWNER:

Contour Lofts LLC2605 State St. San Diego, CA 92103Phone: 858.231.9914 InDev + Design, INC © 2017 All Rights Reserved
InDev, Inc.2605 State St. San Diego, CA 92103Phone: 858.231.9914CSLB# 971403 Architect:

InDev+Design, Inc.2605 State St. San Diego, CA 92103Phone: 858.231.9914LIC# C18932 PROJECT ADDRESS:
2120 Columbia Street San Diego, CA 92101
Submittal DatePlan Date
08/29/201708/28/2017
PROJECT STATUS: BUILDING PERMIT SET
T-24 CONSULTANT:ENVISION ENGINEERING7734 Herchel Ave.La Jolla, CA 92037PHONE: 858.246.7745VANDER VEEN ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS42056 DELMONTE ST. TEMECULA, CA 92591PHONE: 951.795.5172VANDER VEEN ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS42056 DELMONTE ST. TEMECULA, CA 92591 B PHONE: 951.795.5172 CD
2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
PROJECT NAME:GEOTECHNICAL:CHRISTIAN WHEELER ENGINEERING3980 HOME AVE.SAN DIEGO, CA 92105PHONE: 619.550.1700 A-111
5/4/2022 1:58:20 PM RCP TYPE-A
Author
Checker

CANTERA

CANTERA
Revision Schedule
Rev. # Revision Date
3/8" = 1'-0" 1 Type-A Level 1 3/8" = 1'-0" 2 Type-A Level 2 3/8" = 1'-0"

RCP LEGEND

FLOOR PLAN NOTES

1. SMOKE DETECTORS AND CARBON MONOXIDE ALARMS SHALL BE INTERCONNECTED AND SOUND AN ALARM AUDIBLE IN ALL SLEEPING AREAS AND SHALL BE I.C.B.O. APPROVED.ALL ALARMS TO BE INTERCONNECTED AND BE PROVIDED WITH BATERY BACK-UP. ALLALARMS TO BE IN FULL COMPLIANCE WITH SECTIONS 420.5 AND 420.6. SEE ELETRICALPLANS FOR LOCATIONS OF DETECTORS AND ALARMS.

2. ENTRANCE DOORS SHALL BE TIGHT FITTING TO THE FRAME AND SILL.3. FIRE AND/OR SMOKE DAMPER ASSEMBLIES, INCLUDING SLEVES, AND INSTALLATION PROCEDURES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR PRIOR TOINTALLATION.

4. ACCESS TO FIRE AND SMOKE DAMPERS, LARGE ENOUGH TO PERMIT INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE DAMPER AND ITS OPERATING PARTS, SHALL BE PROVIDED. THEACCESS SHALL NOT AFFECT THE INTEGRITY, NOR REDUCE THE FIRE-RESITANCE RATINGOF THE FIRE-RESISTANCE-RATED ASSEBLIES. ACCESS POINTS SHALL BE PERMANENTLYIDENTIFIED ON THE EXTERIOR BY A LABEL HAVING LETTERS NOT LESS THAN 0.5" INHEIGHT READING: FIRE/SMOKE DAMPER, SMOKE DAMPER OR FIRE DAMPER. ACCESSDOORS IN DUCTS SHALL BE TIGHT FITTING AND SUITABLE FOR THE REQUIRED DUCTCONSTRUCTION. [SEC. 717.4]

5. WALLS AT STAIRS AND WALKWAYS TO A MIN. OF 10' ABOVE THE HEIGHT OF THE FINISHED

WALKING SURFACE

6. SLOPE AWAY FROM INTERIOR SURFACE AT EACH ENTRY DOOR - 2%7. WASHER AND DRYER TO HAVE FLOOR DRAIN UNDERNEATH W/ OPTIONAL PAN8. DUCTS IN THE GARAGE AND DUCTS PENETRATING THE WALLS OR CEILINGS SEPARATING THE DWELLING FROM THE GARAGE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF MINUM NO. 26 GAUGESHEET STEEL OR OTHER APPROVED MATERIAL AND SHALL HAVE NO OPENINGS INTO THEGARAGE. CRC R302.5.2

9. SHOWER COMPARTMENTS AND BATHTUBS WITH INSTALLED SHOWER HEADS SHALL BE FINISHED WITH A NONABSORBANT SURFACE THAT EXTENDS TO A HEIGHT OF NO LESSTHAN 6 FEET ABOVE THE FLOOR [CRC R307.2]

10. WHOLE HOUSE VACUUM SYSTEM TO BE INSTALLED
12 WESTCOAT DECK WATERPROOFING SYSTEM - ALX STANDARD (ESR-2201) TYP. ALL DECKS

ADDITIONAL NOTES
U.N.O. FRAME WALLS:EXTERIOR = 2X6INTERIOR = 2X4PLUMBING = 2X6ALL DIMENSIONS TO FACE OF STUD OR FACE OF CONCRETEALL CMU @ PROPERTY LINE TO BE SET BACK 1" MIN.PROP D:A PRE-CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION IS REQUIRED DUE TO THE HEIGHT OF THE PROPOSEDSTRUCTURE BEING WITHIN ONE FOOT OF THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT ALLOWED IN THE COASTALHEIGHT LIMIT OVERLAY ZONE (PROPOSITION D), THE PRE CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION MUSTBE SCHEDULED AND CLEARED BY THE FIELD INSPECTOR BEFORE ANY SUBSEQUENTINSPECTIONS CAN BE SCHEDULED.

KEYNOTES

NUMBER KEYNOTE
304 HVAC UNIT PER MECHANICAL307 EXHAUST FAN SQUARE - LOW PROFILE

Page 361 of 615 ends

L L
L L L
J
L L
L
S/C
J
J
L
L
LL
L
L L LL
S/C
S S
I
J
L
S
C
S/C

DOWN TO
BELOW
UP TO
ABOVE
307
304 304
DOWN

TO BELOW
307 307
304 304
307

EXHAUST FAN OUTDOOR WALL LIGHT
Drawn byReviewed by
1 A Project number
STRUCTURAL ENG:MEP:GENERAL CONTRACTOR:OWNER:

CANTERA

CANTERA
Revision Schedule
Rev. # Revision Date
3/8" = 1'-0" 1 Type-B Level 13/8" = 1'-0" 2 Type-B Level 2 3/8" = 1'-0"

RCP LEGEND

FLOOR PLAN NOTES

1. SMOKE DETECTORS AND CARBON MONOXIDE ALARMS SHALL BE INTERCONNECTED AND SOUND AN ALARM AUDIBLE IN ALL SLEEPING AREAS AND SHALL BE I.C.B.O. APPROVED.ALL ALARMS TO BE INTERCONNECTED AND BE PROVIDED WITH BATERY BACK-UP. ALLALARMS TO BE IN FULL COMPLIANCE WITH SECTIONS 420.5 AND 420.6. SEE ELETRICALPLANS FOR LOCATIONS OF DETECTORS AND ALARMS.

4. ACCESS TO FIRE AND SMOKE DAMPERS, LARGE ENOUGH TO PERMIT INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE DAMPER AND ITS OPERATING PARTS, SHALL BE PROVIDED. THEACCESS SHALL NOT AFFECT THE INTEGRITY, NOR REDUCE THE FIRE-RESITANCE RATINGOF THE FIRE-RESISTANCE-RATED ASSEBLIES. ACCESS POINTS SHALL BE PERMANENTLYIDENTIFIED ON THE EXTERIOR BY A LABEL HAVING LETTERS NOT LESS THAN 0.5" INHEIGHT READING: FIRE/SMOKE DAMPER, SMOKE DAMPER OR FIRE DAMPER. ACCESSDOORS IN DUCTS SHALL BE TIGHT FITTING AND SUITABLE FOR THE REQUIRED DUCTCONSTRUCTION. [SEC. 717.4]

5. WALLS AT STAIRS AND WALKWAYS TO A MIN. OF 10' ABOVE THE HEIGHT OF THE FINISHED

WALKING SURFACE

9. SHOWER COMPARTMENTS AND BATHTUBS WITH INSTALLED SHOWER HEADS SHALL BE FINISHED WITH A NONABSORBANT SURFACE THAT EXTENDS TO A HEIGHT OF NO LESSTHAN 6 FEET ABOVE THE FLOOR [CRC R307.2]

10. WHOLE HOUSE VACUUM SYSTEM TO BE INSTALLED
12 WESTCOAT DECK WATERPROOFING SYSTEM - ALX STANDARD (ESR-2201) TYP. ALL DECKS

KEYNOTES

NUMBER KEYNOTE
304 HVAC UNIT PER MECHANICAL307 EXHAUST FAN SQUARE - LOW PROFILE

Page 362 of 615 ends

L
LL L
L
J
LL
S/C
LL
L
L
J
J J
L
S
S/C
S
S
I
J
L
S
C
S/C

DOWN TO
BELOW
UP TO
ABOVE
307
307
304
3 3
3 3

DOWN TO
BELOW
304
307
304 304
1'-6" 1'-6 1/4"

EXHAUST FAN OUTDOOR WALL LIGHT
Drawn byReviewed by
1 A Project number
STRUCTURAL ENG:MEP:GENERAL CONTRACTOR:OWNER:

CANTERA

CANTERA
Revision Schedule
Rev. # Revision Date
3/8" = 1'-0" 1 Type-C Level 1 3/8" = 1'-0" 2 Type-C Level 2 3/8" = 1'-0"

RCP LEGEND

FLOOR PLAN NOTES

1. SMOKE DETECTORS AND CARBON MONOXIDE ALARMS SHALL BE INTERCONNECTED AND SOUND AN ALARM AUDIBLE IN ALL SLEEPING AREAS AND SHALL BE I.C.B.O. APPROVED.ALL ALARMS TO BE INTERCONNECTED AND BE PROVIDED WITH BATERY BACK-UP. ALLALARMS TO BE IN FULL COMPLIANCE WITH SECTIONS 420.5 AND 420.6. SEE ELETRICALPLANS FOR LOCATIONS OF DETECTORS AND ALARMS.

4. ACCESS TO FIRE AND SMOKE DAMPERS, LARGE ENOUGH TO PERMIT INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE DAMPER AND ITS OPERATING PARTS, SHALL BE PROVIDED. THEACCESS SHALL NOT AFFECT THE INTEGRITY, NOR REDUCE THE FIRE-RESITANCE RATINGOF THE FIRE-RESISTANCE-RATED ASSEBLIES. ACCESS POINTS SHALL BE PERMANENTLYIDENTIFIED ON THE EXTERIOR BY A LABEL HAVING LETTERS NOT LESS THAN 0.5" INHEIGHT READING: FIRE/SMOKE DAMPER, SMOKE DAMPER OR FIRE DAMPER. ACCESSDOORS IN DUCTS SHALL BE TIGHT FITTING AND SUITABLE FOR THE REQUIRED DUCTCONSTRUCTION. [SEC. 717.4]

5. WALLS AT STAIRS AND WALKWAYS TO A MIN. OF 10' ABOVE THE HEIGHT OF THE FINISHED

WALKING SURFACE

9. SHOWER COMPARTMENTS AND BATHTUBS WITH INSTALLED SHOWER HEADS SHALL BE FINISHED WITH A NONABSORBANT SURFACE THAT EXTENDS TO A HEIGHT OF NO LESSTHAN 6 FEET ABOVE THE FLOOR [CRC R307.2]

10. WHOLE HOUSE VACUUM SYSTEM TO BE INSTALLED
12 WESTCOAT DECK WATERPROOFING SYSTEM - ALX STANDARD (ESR-2201) TYP. ALL DECKS

KEYNOTES

NUMBER KEYNOTE
304 HVAC UNIT PER MECHANICAL307 EXHAUST FAN SQUARE - LOW PROFILE

Page 363 of 615 ends

Level 1
0' - 0"
Level 2
10' - 0"
Master - Roof
20' - 0"
A-1
AA
1 A-301
2 A-301
1'-0" 20'-0"
21'-0"
10'-0" 10'-0"
1'-0" 9'-0"

ELEVATION OF BUILDING PAD PER CIVIL

BLACK ANODIZED ALUMINUM ROOFING CAP

BLACK ANODIZED ALUMINUM BANDING AND EDGING

BLACK ANODIZED ALUMINUM

SIDING AND EDGING

SIDING PER

DESIGN STYLE

SIDING PER

DESIGN STYLE
4'-0"
5'-0"
AI
AH
AK
AJ
Level 1
0' - 0"
Level 2
10' - 0"
Master - Roof
20' - 0"
1 A-301
2 A-301
21'-0"
20'-0" 1'-0"
10'-0" 10'-0"
9'-0" 1'-0"

ELEVATION OF BUILDING PAD PER CIVIL
NOTE: SEE CIVIL AND SITE PLAN FOR LOCATIONS OF GAS METER, ELECTRICAL METER, AND HVAC CONDENSER *OR EQUIVALENT
*OR EQUIVALENT
*OR EQUIVALENT
AL
AM AO
AN
AC AE
AB AD
Level 1
0' - 0"
Level 2
10' - 0"
Master - Roof
20' - 0"
AG
3 A-301 4
A-301
21'-0"
1'-0" 20'-0"
10'-0" 10'-0"
1'-0" 9'-0"

ELEVATION OF BUILDING PAD PER CIVIL
NOTE: SEE CIVIL AND SITE PLAN FOR LOCATIONS OF GAS METER, ELECTRICAL METER, AND HVAC CONDENSER NOTE: SEE CIVIL AND SITE PLAN FOR LOCATIONS OF GAS METER, ELECTRICAL METER, AND HVAC CONDENSER

BLACK ANODIZED ALUMINUM ROOFING CAP

BLACK ANODIZED ALUMINUM BANDING AND EDGINGBLACK ANODIZED ALUMINUM SIDING AND EDGING

SIDING PER

DESIGN STYLE

SIDING PER

DESIGN STYLE
*OR EQUIVALENT
*OR EQUIVALENT
*OR EQUIVALENT
AF
AP
AQ
Level 1
0' - 0"
Level 2
10' - 0"
Master - Roof
20' - 0"
3 A-301 4
A-301
21'-0"
1'-0" 20'-0"
10'-0" 10'-0"
1'-0" 9'-0"

BLACK ANODIZED ALUMINUM ROOFING CAP

BLACK ANODIZED ALUMINUM BANDING AND EDGING

SIDING PER

DESIGN STYLE

SIDING PER

DESIGN STYLE
*OR EQUIVALENT
*OR EQUIVALENT
Drawn byReviewed by
1 D Project number
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:MEP:STRUCTURAL ENGINEER:Developer:

InDev+Design, Inc.2120 Columbia St.Suite 17 San Diego, CA 92101Phone: 858.231.9914 PROJECT ADDRESS:
8043 HIGH St.LA MESA, CA 91941

REVISIONS
Submittal DatePlan Date
TBD
DEC 2021
PROJECT STATUS:

AJB

ZS / CG

CANTERA-KISHOUSE
PROJECT # B19-319-324
A-201
5/4/2022 1:58:34 PM

UNIT AELEVATIONS

CANTERA
3/8" = 1'-0" 1 UNIT A FRONT
3/8" = 1'-0" 3 UNIT A BACK 3/8" = 1'-0" 4 UNIT A RIGHT
3/8" = 1'-0" 2 UNIT A LEFT

BLACK ANODIZED ALUMINUM ROOFING CAP

BLACK ANODIZED ALUMINUM BANDING AND EDGINGBLACK ANODIZED ALUMINUM SIDING AND EDGING

SIDING PER

DESIGN STYLE

SIDING PER

DESIGN STYLE
*OR EQUIVALENT
*OR EQUIVALENT
*OR EQUIVALENT

Page 364 of 615 ends

Level 1
0' - 0"
Level 2
10' - 0"
Master - Roof
20' - 0"
B-1
B-8
3 A-302
4 A-302
21'-0"
1'-0" 20'-0"
10'-0" 10'-0"
1'-0" 9'-0"

BLACK ANODIZED ALUMINUM ROOFING CAP

BLACK ANODIZED ALUMINUM BANDING AND EDGING

BLACK ANODIZED ALUMINUM SIDING AND EDGING

SIDING PER

DESIGN STYLE

SIDING PER

DESIGN STYLE

SIDING PER

DESIGN STYLE

SIDING PER

DESIGN STYLE

GLASS GUARDRAIL
*OR EQUIVALENT
BBBA
Level 1
0' - 0"
Level 2
10' - 0"
Master - Roof
20' - 0"
BT
3 A-302
4 A-302
21'-0"
20'-0" 1'-0"
10'-0" 10'-0"
9'-0" 1'-0"

BLACK ANODIZED ALUMINUM ROOFING CAP

BLACK ANODIZED ALUMINUM BANDING AND EDGING

BLACK ANODIZED ALUMINUM SIDING AND EDGING

SIDING PER

DESIGN STYLE

SIDING PER

DESIGN STYLE

SIDING PER

DESIGN STYLE

SIDING PER

DESIGN STYLE
*OR EQUIVALENT
*OR EQUIVALENT
*OR EQUIVALENT
Level 1
0' - 0"
Level 2
10' - 0"
Master - Roof
20' - 0"
BE
BS
BC
1 A-302
2 A-302
21'-0"
1'-0" 20'-0"
10'-0" 10'-0"
1'-0" 9'-0"

ELEVATION OF BUILDING PAD PER CIVIL
NOTE: SEE CIVIL AND SITE PLAN FOR LOCATIONS OF GAS METER, ELECTRICAL METER, AND HVAC CONDENSER

BLACK ANODIZED ALUMINUM ROOFING CAP

BLACK ANODIZED ALUMINUM BANDING AND EDGING

BLACK ANODIZED ALUMINUM

SIDING AND EDGING

SIDING PER

DESIGN STYLE

SIDING PER

DESIGN STYLE
*OR EQUIVALENT
*OR EQUIVALENT
*OR EQUIVALENT
3'-10"

BD BF BH
BG
BP
BR
BO BQ
BE
BF
BG
Level 1
0' - 0"
Level 2
10' - 0"
Master - Roof
20' - 0"
BI
1 A-302
2 A-302
21'-0"
1'-0" 20'-0"
10'-0" 10'-0"
1'-0" 9'-0"

ELEVATION OF BUILDING PAD PER CIVIL
NOTE: SEE CIVIL AND SITE PLAN FOR LOCATIONS OF GAS METER, ELECTRICAL METER, AND HVAC CONDENSER

BLACK ANODIZED ALUMINUM ROOFING CAP

BLACK ANODIZED ALUMINUM BANDING AND EDGING

BLACK ANODIZED ALUMINUM

SIDING AND EDGING

SIDING PER

DESIGN STYLE

SIDING PER

DESIGN STYLE
*OR EQUIVALENT
*OR EQUIVALENT
*OR EQUIVALENT
BU
BJ BL
BK
BN
BM
BW BY
BV BX
Drawn byReviewed by
1 D Project number
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:MEP:STRUCTURAL ENGINEER:Developer:

InDev+Design, Inc.2120 Columbia St.Suite 17 San Diego, CA 92101Phone: 858.231.9914 PROJECT ADDRESS:
8043 HIGH St.LA MESA, CA 91941

REVISIONS
Submittal DatePlan Date
TBD
DEC 2021
PROJECT STATUS:

AJB

ZS / CG

CANTERA-KISHOUSE
PROJECT # B19-319-324
A-202
5/4/2022 1:58:38 PM

UNIT BELEVATIONS

CANTERA
3/8" = 1'-0" 1 UNIT Ba FRONT
3/8" = 1'-0" 2 UNIT Ba BACK
3/8" = 1'-0" 3 UNIT Ba LEFT
3/8" = 1'-0" 4 UNIT Ba RIGHT

Page 365 of 615 ends

Level 1
0' - 0"
Level 2
10' - 0"
Master - Roof
20' - 0"
CA
C-1
CK CM
1 A-303
2 A-303

ELEVATION OF BUILDING PAD PER CIVIL
21'-0"
1'-0" 20'-0"
10'-0" 10'-0"
1'-0" 9'-0"

BLACK ANODIZED ALUMINUM ROOFING CAP

BLACK ANODIZED ALUMINUM BANDING AND EDGING

BLACK ANODIZED ALUMINUM

SIDING AND EDGING

SIDING PER

DESIGN STYLE

SIDING PER

DESIGN STYLE

SIDING PER

DESIGN STYLE

SIDING PER

DESIGN STYLE
*OR EQUIVALENT
*OR EQUIVALENT
*OR EQUIVALENT
4 1/2"
CB
CL CN
Level 1
0' - 0"
Level 2
10' - 0"
Master - Roof
20' - 0"
CC CE
1 A-303
2 A-303
21'-0"
20'-0" 1'-0"
10'-0" 10'-0"
9'-0" 1'-0"

BLACK ANODIZED ALUMINUM ROOFING CAP

BLACK ANODIZED ALUMINUM BANDING AND EDGING

BLACK ANODIZED ALUMINUM

SIDING AND EDGING

SIDING PER

DESIGN STYLE

SIDING PER

DESIGN STYLE

SIDING PER

DESIGN STYLE

SIDING PER

DESIGN STYLE
*OR EQUIVALENT
*OR EQUIVALENT
*OR EQUIVALENT

CD CF CH CJ
CG CI
CO
CP
CQ

CR CT CV
CS CU
Level 1
0' - 0"
Level 2
10' - 0"
Master - Roof
20' - 0"
3 A-303
4 A-303
21'-0"
1'-0" 20'-0"
10'-0" 10'-0"
1'-0" 9'-0"

BLACK ANODIZED ALUMINUM ROOFING CAP

BLACK ANODIZED ALUMINUM BANDING AND EDGING

SIDING PER

DESIGN STYLE

SIDING PER

DESIGN STYLE

SIDING PER

DESIGN STYLE

SIDING PER

DESIGN STYLE
*OR EQUIVALENT
*OR EQUIVALENT
Level 1
0' - 0"
Level 2
10' - 0"
Master - Roof
20' - 0"
3 A-303
4 A-303

ELEVATION OF BUILDING PAD PER CIVIL
21'-0"
1'-0" 20'-0"
10'-0" 10'-0"
1'-0" 9'-0"
NOTE: SEE CIVIL AND SITE PLAN FOR LOCATIONS OF GAS METER, ELECTRICAL METER, AND HVAC CONDENSER NOTE: SEE CIVIL AND SITE PLAN FOR LOCATIONS OF GAS METER, ELECTRICAL METER, AND HVAC CONDENSER

BLACK ANODIZED ALUMINUM ROOFING CAP

BLACK ANODIZED ALUMINUM BANDING AND EDGING

SIDING PER

DESIGN STYLE

SIDING PER

DESIGN STYLE

SIDING PER

DESIGN STYLE
*OR EQUIVALENT
*OR EQUIVALENT
Drawn byReviewed by
1 D Project number
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:MEP:STRUCTURAL ENGINEER:Developer:

InDev+Design, Inc.2120 Columbia St.Suite 17 San Diego, CA 92101Phone: 858.231.9914 PROJECT ADDRESS:
8043 HIGH St.LA MESA, CA 91941

REVISIONS
Submittal DatePlan Date
TBD
DEC 2021
PROJECT STATUS:

AJB

ZS / CG

CANTERA-KISHOUSE
PROJECT # B19-319-324
A-203
5/4/2022 1:58:41 PM

UNIT CELEVATIONS

CANTERA
3/8" = 1'-0" 1 UNIT C FRONT
3/8" = 1'-0" 2 UNIT C BACK
3/8" = 1'-0" 3 UNIT C LEFT
3/8" = 1'-0" 4 UNIT C RIGHT

Page 366 of 615 ends

La Mesa City CouncilJune 14, 2022

La Mesa City Council
June 14, 2022