Cities Index.
Agenda packet, regular meeting

Laguna Hills City Council
July 14, 2026

Document
Agenda packet, regular meeting
Meeting
July 14, 2026
Body
Laguna Hills City Council
Pages
989
Original file
372.6 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on lagunahillsca.api.civicclerk.com. That file is the official record.

Amina Mannan 2
Select Pavement Management Plan (PMP) Projects
City of Newport Beach, Citywide Pavement Management Plan Updates for 2023, 2025:

Managed the on-going, citywide pavement management plan study consisting of 205 centerline miles of streets to comply with OCTA Measure M2 funding requirements.

City of Laguna Niguel, CA, Citywide Pavement Management Plan Updates, 2020 to 2026:

Pavement condition index (PCI) assessment of all city-maintained streets consisting of a total of approximately 141.5 centerline miles of streets and budget scenario analysis to help optimize the City’s pavement maintenance and rehabilitation schedule and budget (approximately $2.1M per year typically).

City of Aliso Viejo CA, Citywide Pavement Management Plan Updates, 2025 to 2028:

Pavement condition index (PCI) assessment of all city-maintained streets consisting of a total of approximately 72.2 centerline miles of streets and budget scenario analysis to help optimize the City’s pavement maintenance and rehabilitation schedule and budget (approximately $1.75M per year typically).

City of San Fernando, 2024 Citywide Pavement Management Plan Update: Managed the City’s pavement management plan study consisting of 50 centerline miles of streets to comply with Los Angeles County Transportation Authority (METRO) pavement management requirements.

City of Hermosa Beach, 2024 Citywide Pavement Management Plan Update: Managed the City’s pavement management plan study consisting of 48 centerline miles of streets to comply with Los Angeles County Transportation Authority (METRO) pavement management requirements.

Groves at Orchard Hills Homeowners Association, Pavement Management Plan Update 2024, Irvine, CA: Updated the pavement management inventory and performed pavement management plan updates in 2024.

Casta Del Sol Community Association, Pavement Management Plan Update 2024, Mission Viejo, CA: Updated the pavement management system for approximately 22 centerline miles of streets managed by the HOA with a yearly street improvement budget of approximately $1.2M to $2.2M per year. Performing periodic reviews and updates to the community’s pavement management plan each year.

Canyon Lake Property Owners Association, Pavement Management Plan Update 2024, Canyon Lake, CA: Updated the pavement management system for approximately 37 centerline miles of streets managed by the HOA with a yearly street improvement budget of approximately $3M per year.

Oasis Palm Desert Homeowners Association Pavement Management Plan, 2023, Palm Desert, CA: Creating the HOA’s street network inventory, performing walking pavement condition assessment of the HOA streets, reviewing previous Maintenance and Rehabilitation (M&R) activities, performing various budget scenarios analysis, and recommending Maintenance and Rehabilitation (M&R) treatments for the next 5 years.

Page 707 of 989 ends

Amina Mannan 3
Select Pavement Evaluation and Design Projects – Local Municipalities and Agencies Western Avenue and Carie Lane Pavement Evaluation Project, City of Stanton, CA, 2025- 2026: Pavement design engineer responsible for pavement condition evaluation, corings, lab testing, and rehabilitation recommendations. Western Avenue (TI up to 10.5) was found to have less than half the required structural capacity due to heavy truck traffic. Two alternatives were developed: (1) edge‑mill and ARHM overlay with fiber‑reinforced AC leveling and localized full‑depth repairs, and (2) full‑depth reclamation with cement treatment (FDR‑C).

San Miguel Drive Pavement Evaluation Project (San Joaquin Hills Road to Ford Road), City of Newport Beach, CA, 2025: Pavement design engineer overseeing evaluation of ~7,750 LF of San Miguel Drive, including review of as‑built plans, pavement condition assessment, FWD testing, corings, lab testing, and identification of localized AC repair areas. Findings showed that reduced AC thickness from prior improvements is contributing to current structural inadequacy, most notably the outside (Lane 2) travel lanes. Recommended rehabilitation consisted of a edge mill‑and‑overlay using ARHM‑GG‑C with localized 6.5‑inch full‑depth AC patches.

Bristol Street North and Spy Glass Hill Road Pavement Evaluation Projects, City of Newport Beach, CA, 2024-2025: Pavement design engineer overseeing evaluation of ~4,000 LF of Bristol Street North and ~6,000 LF of Spy Glass Hill Road, including pavement condition assessment, FWD testing, corings, lab testing, and rehabilitation recommendations.

Recommended mill‑and‑overlay with ARHM‑GG‑C and localized full‑depth AC patches for both segments, with a leveling course specified for Bristol Street North to mitigate delamination risk.

Harbor Boulevard from Lincoln Avenue to North Street, Pavement Evaluation Project, City of Anaheim, CA, July 2024: Pavement design engineer overseeing the evaluation of the segments located in the City of Anaheim, including pavement surface condition assessment, corings, laboratory testing, analysis, and development of pavement rehabilitation recommendations.

Brookhurst Street from Ball Road to La Palma Avenue, Pavement Evaluation Project, City of Anaheim, CA, September 2024: Pavement design engineer overseeing the evaluation of the segments located in the City of Anaheim, including pavement surface condition assessment, corings, laboratory testing, analysis, and development of pavement rehabilitation recommendations.
2020 “Phase II” Citywide Pavement Evaluation Project, City of Aliso Viejo, CA, ongoing:

Pavement design engineer overseeing pavement condition assessments, corings, laboratory testing, analysis, and pavement repair recommendations of arterial and residential street segments.

Aliso Viejo Prakway Pavement Evaluation Project (Enterprise to Aliso Creek), City of Aliso Viejo, CA, 2025: Pavement design engineer overseeing the evaluation of Aliso Viejo Parkway, including pavement condition assessment, FWD testing, corings, laboratory testing, and development of pavement improvement recommendations. The evaluation included identification of structural weaknesses along the corridor. Recommended rehabilitation consisted of a mill‑and‑overlay with localized full‑depth AC repairs.

Annual Residential Resurfacing FY 2024-25 & 2025-26 Project, City of Dana Point, CA, ongoing: Pavement design engineer performing and overseeing the pavement evaluation of various residential streets, including corings, ground-penetrating radar (GPR) testing, Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) testing, laboratory testing, and analysis.

Page 708 of 989 ends

Amina Mannan 4
Crenshaw Boulevard Rehabilitation Project, City of Torrance, CA, April 2019: Performed pavement evaluation to develop pavement rehabilitation repair recommendations.

Crenshaw Boulevard Between 79th Street and I-105 Freeway, City of Inglewood, CA, January 2024: Performing and analyzing ground-penetrating radar (GPR) testing to identify approximate limits of buried underlying PCC.

Seal Beach Boulevard from Westminster Boulevard to N Gate Road, City of Seal Beach, CA, March 2024: Performed pavement evaluation to develop rehabilitation repair recommendations for Seal Beach Boulevard.

Access Trail Evaluation and Pavement Design, City of Anaheim, CA, April 2024: Pavement design engineer overseeing the field exploration, laboratory testing, analysis, and development of pavement design recommendations.

Select Quality Assurance Testing and Observation Projects Glenwood Road Pavement Rehabilitation Project, City of Aliso Viejo, CA, 2025: Quality assurance observation and testing services for the mill-and-overlay rehabilitation of Glenwood Road. GMU provided materials testing of asphalt concrete, concrete, and subgrade compaction, to support the project.
2025 Residential Streets Improvements Project, (CP-1446000) (CP-1303000), City of Garden Grove, CA, 2025: Oversaw quality assurance observation and testing services for this residential streets improvement project. GMU provided materials testing of asphalt concrete, subgrade compaction, slurry, and concrete materials to support the project.

Harbor Blvd and Garden Grove Blvd Intersection Improvement Project (CP-1303000), City of Garden Grove, CA, 2025-2026: Oversaw quality assurance observation and testing services for this intersection improvement project. Improvements consisted of roadway widening, construction of new turn lanes, asphalt concrete and aggregate base paving, concrete curb and gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, catch basins, storm drain piping, and traffic signal installation. GMU provided materials testing of asphalt concrete, aggregate base, subgrade compaction, and concrete materials to support the project.

Annual Residential Roadway Repair, Overlay, and Slurry Seal Projects, City of Mission Viejo, CA, 2024 to Present: Oversight and management of quality assurance observation and testing services for the City's annual residential roadway repair, overlay, and slurry seal projects.

Improvements generally consisted of localized AC patch repairs and AC overlay of arterial and residential streets, and annual slurry seal applications.

Phase 3 Annual Street Resurfacing Project, City of San Fernando, CA, 2024: Construction management (CM) and quality assurance (QA) testing services. 2024 Asphalt Repairs and Asphalt Overlays of Various Streets, City of Mission Viejo, CA, Ongoing: Quality control and asphalt concrete observation and testing.

Cityside Fiber Micro-Trench Asphalt Restoration, City of Mission Viejo, CA, Ongoing:

Quality control, field density testing, and asphalt concrete observation and testing.

Page 709 of 989 ends

Amina Mannan 5
Select Homeowner Association Pavement Projects
Oasis Palm Desert Homeowners Association Pavement Evaluation Project, March-June 2024
Pavement design engineer performing and overseeing the pavement evaluation including corings, Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) testing, laboratory testing, and analysis.

Caritas Corp. Pavement Evaluation Project, May-July 2024 Pavement design engineer performing and overseeing the pavement evaluation of three sites located in Brea and Vista, SC, including pavement condition index (PCI) surveys, corings, laboratory testing, and analysis. Provided 15-year plan of the recommended future pavement maintenance/rehabilitation for each site.

Connemara by the Sea Homeowners Association, San Juan Capistrano, CA, Pavement Evaluation Project, June-August 2024: Performed pavement condition index (PCI) surveys, corings, laboratory testing, and analysis. Provided 5-year plan of the recommended future pavement maintenance/rehabilitation.

Ocean Ranch Homeowners Association 2024 Pavement Improvement, Laguna Niguel, CA:

Providing pavement maintenance/repair budget advisory, maintenance/repair design, and Prepared plan/specs for 2024 pavement project.

Shady Canyon Homeowners Association 2024 Pavement Improvement, Irvine, CA:

Providing pavement maintenance/repair budget advisory, maintenance/repair design, and construction support services for 2024 pavement project.

Casta Del Sol Community Association, 2024 Pavement Improvement, Mission Viejo, CA:

Providing pavement maintenance/repair budget advisory, maintenance/repair design, and Prepared plan/specs for 2024 pavement project.

Lake Forest II Master Homeowners Association, 2024 Pavement Improvement, Lake Forest, CA: Providing pavement maintenance/repair budget advisory, maintenance/repair design, and prepared plan/specs for 2024 pavement project.

Page 710 of 989 ends

30336 Esperanza, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688 | ph: 949.888.6513 | fax: 949.888.1380 | web: www.gmugeo.com BRYAN E. RODRIGUEZ, PG, CEG
Project Engineering Geologist

PROFESSION
Engineering Geologist

REGISTRATIONS
Certified Engineering Geologist,
State of California
Professional Geologist,
State of California

EDUCATION
B.A., Geology
(Minor: Chemistry)
California State Polytechnic
University, Humboldt | 2014

AFFILIATIONS
South Coast Geological Society
Bryan Rodriguez is a Project Engineering Geologist with 8 years of experience in the geotechnical industry. He has developed a broad and versatile background working on
projects across both the private and public sectors in
Southern California. His portfolio spans residential and commercial developments, custom lots, ADUs, HOA
communities, bluff erosion studies, landslide and slope stability investigations, fault studies, major roadway
infrastructure, and utility projects.

In addition to his design and development work, Bryan
has extensive expertise in forensic investigations,
evaluating structural distress in commercial buildings and residential homes. He has contributed to several highprofile landslide projects in Orange, Los Angeles, and San Bernardino Counties, with responsibilities including geologic mapping, downhole and continuous core
logging, and geophysical data interpretation. Bryan also has strong experience in project management, proposal
preparation, report writing, field crew supervision, and maintaining professional relationships with clients and contractors.

Selected project categories representative of Mr.

Rodriguez's experience are described below:
• Landslide / Slope Failure Investigation and Repair
• Fault Studies and Seismic Hazard Investigations
• Public Works and Infrastructure Projects
• Residential and Commercial Development
• HOA Geotechnical and Pavement Consulting
• Forensic / Structural Distress Investigations
• Water Infrastructure and Reservoir Projects
• Construction Management and Oversight
• Environmental Site Assessments
Additional information and representative projects from Bryan's portfolio are summarized on the following pages.

Page 711 of 989 ends

Bryan E. Rodriguez 2

TECHNICAL EXPERTISE
• Geologic Field Mapping
• Downhole and Continuous Core Logging
• Hollow Stem Auger and Mud Rotary Drilling
• Large-Diameter Bucket Auger Borings
• Rock Core Logging
• Test Pit Excavation and Logging
• Well Permeameter / Infiltration Testing
• Nuclear Density Gauge and Sand-Cone
Testing
• Pavement Coring and Condition
Assessment
• Fault Trench Logging and Seismic Hazard
Investigations
• Geotechnical Instrumentation
(Inclinometers)
• Geophysical Data Interpretation
• Aerial Photography Analysis
• Forensic / Structural Distress Evaluations
• Construction Monitoring and Quality
Assurance
• Geotechnical Cross Section Drafting
• Report and Proposal Preparation

REPRESENTATIVE PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Trabuco Canyon Water District — On-Call Project Management | TCWD, Trabuco Canyon, CA (Current)
Project management for various on-call tasks including pavement design, construction observations and testing, and welding inspection for the District's ongoing maintenance program.

Huntington Beach Dog Park — Geotechnical Monitoring | City of Huntington Beach, CA (2026)
Project management for geological monitoring during slope failure remediation. Included observation of keyway excavation, geogrid placement, subdrain installation, and fill placement and compaction.

Forster Ranch HOA — Slope Failure Evaluation and Observation | San Clemente, CA (2026)
Provided remedial recommendations for a community slope failure and managed construction observation and testing during the remediation phase.

Rancho San Joaquin HOA — Pavement Evaluation | Irvine, CA (2026) Managed pavement evaluation and remedial recommendations for failing subgrade. Investigation included asphalt coring, subgrade sampling, and laboratory testing to characterize subsurface conditions.

Lake Mission Viejo Association — Water Improvement Project | Mission Viejo, CA (Current)
Managed geotechnical investigation for a proposed pump station, prepared the geotechnical report and design recommendations, and currently manages the construction phase providing geotechnical observation and testing services.

Santa Lucia HOA — Slope and Retaining Wall Evaluation | Newport Coast, CA (2026) Conducted slope stability and retaining wall evaluation at two areas of reported distress within the community, including site reconnaissance, document review, and written findings.

RMV Planning Area 3.14 — Debris Basin Subsurface Investigation | Rancho Mission Viejo, CA (Current)
Conducted subsurface investigation using an excavator to document the extent of old pond deposits at the site of a future debris basin; findings were used to quantify export quantities during grading.

Page 712 of 989 ends

Bryan E. Rodriguez 3
Prima Deschecha Landfill, Landslide C — Geotechnical Investigation | OC Waste & Recycling, San Juan Capistrano, CA (2025)
Conducted subsurface investigation to determine limits of Landslide C, including coordination and logging of thirteen continuous borings and subsequent downhole geophysical surveys.

Shady View Residential Development — Geological Monitoring | Trumark Homes, Chino Hills, CA (2025)
Assisted in geological monitoring during rough grading of the approximately 72-acre residential development. Work included monitoring of cut slopes and landslide areas, active fault zones, settlement monitor installation, and evaluation of import sites for MSE-wall backfill materials.

East San Fernando Valley Light Rail Transit Project | LA Metro / AECOM, Panorama City, CA (2024)
Provided subsurface investigation drilling along Van Nuys Boulevard for a proposed light rail transit project in support of design-level geotechnical evaluation.

Palm Innovation Academy — Fault Investigation | BUSD, Beaumont, CA (2024) Assisted in fault trench mapping at the school site to support construction of a new building structure. The approximately 150-foot-long, 15-foot-deep trench revealed buried floodplain strata with no evidence of Quaternary faulting.

Chevron Coyote Hills — Geotechnical Investigation | Fullerton, CA Managed field activities for 37 large-diameter bucket auger borings (to 131 ft bgs), 26 hollowstem auger borings, and 19 test pits in support of grading plan review for a proposed development.

Drafted and analyzed geotechnical cross sections and prepared the project report.

In-N-Out Headquarters — Infiltration Testing | In-N-Out, Inc., Baldwin Park, CA (2025) Provided preliminary infiltration testing for a proposed new In-N-Out Burger headquarters development project to support stormwater and foundation design.

Industry Business Center — Geological Monitoring | City of Industry, CA Assisted in geological monitoring during rough grading of the approximately 595-acre Industry Business Center. Work included monitoring of cut slopes and potential landslide areas, subdrain installation, downhole logging, fault trench logging, test pit logging, and inclinometer monitoring.

Distribution Facility — Geotechnical Engineering | Sun Valley, CA Provided observation for 1,544 DeWaal displacement pile installations for two distribution buildings constructed over a reclaimed gravel pit. Monitored daily progress, installation methods, and confirmed depth to alluvial soil for each pile. Coordinated real-time field telemetry for accurate daily reporting.

Suburban Water Systems Plant 408 Reservoir Replacement | La Mirada, CA Provided geotechnical observation and materials testing during construction of two approximately 2-million-gallon capacity potable water steel tanks, including remedial subgrade recompaction and nuclear density testing.

Apple Valley Ranchos Water Company Well 35 | Apple Valley, CA Assisted in subsurface exploration and geotechnical evaluation for a new pump house and generator pad. Field activities included drilling and logging four hollow-stem auger borings and conducting two in-situ ground resistivity geophysical surveys.

Golden State Water Company Happy Trails Reservoir | Apple Valley, CA Assisted in subsurface exploration for a new 0.3-million-gallon water tank reservoir. Field activities included geologic mapping, excavation, logging, and sampling of seven test pits.

Page 713 of 989 ends

Bryan E. Rodriguez 4
Valley County Water District — Geotechnical Investigation | Baldwin Park, CA Assisted in subsurface exploration for a new District headquarters campus. Field activities included excavating and logging seven test pits, conducting infiltration testing, and performing nuclear density testing of in-situ soil conditions.

Forensic Structural Distress Evaluations — Various Homeowners | AAA Insurance, Various Cities, CA (Current)
Provides on-call forensic evaluations for AAA homeowners insurance claims, including retaining wall failures, foundation distress, and flooding assessments.

Page 714 of 989 ends

30336 Esperanza, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688 | ph: 949.888.6513 | fax: 949.888.1380 | web: www.gmugeo.com

JADE SILL
Senior Engineering Technician

PROFESSION
Engineering Technician

EDUCATION
B.A Geography-Environmental
Analysis
California State University of
Fullerton (CSUF)

CERTIFICATIONS
ACI Level 1 Concrete Technician
CPN Certified for Nuclear Gauge
Operation
ICC Registered Special Inspector –
Reinforced Concrete
City of Irvine Deputy Inspector –
Reinforced Concrete & Asphalt
County of Orange Deputy Inspector –
Reinforced Concrete
City of Newport Beach Deputy
Inspector – Reinforced Concrete
Mr. Sill has 24 years of experience providing field
engineering, construction observation, public works
inspection support, and materials testing services for
municipal and infrastructure projects throughout
Southern California. His experience includes
inspection and documentation of public improvements,
grading activities, utility installations, roadway
construction, pavement rehabilitation, and construction materials compliance.

Mr. Sill routinely supports Public Works and Grading
Departments through field coordination, contractor
interface, verification of conformance with approved
plans and specifications, preparation of field
documentation, and observation/testing of earthwork,
asphalt paving, and reinforced concrete construction
activities. He has recent direct experience supporting
municipal inspection assignments for the Cities of Dana Point and Laguna Niguel.

Mr. Sill’s technical strengths include pavement
observation and testing, grading inspection support,
reinforced concrete inspection, construction materials
testing, and coordination between contractors, project
managers, and agency staff during active construction.

Relevant Public Works Inspection Experience
• Public Works Inspection support for municipal
infrastructure improvements, roadway rehabilitation,
utility installations, encroachment permit work, and
capital improvement projects
• Daily field observation and coordination with
contractors, agency staff, and project management
teams
• Verification of contractor conformance with approved
plans, specifications, and applicable standards
• Documentation of field activities, testing results,
corrective actions, and project progress
• Grading inspection and construction observation for
public and private development projects
• Observation and testing of earthwork, aggregate base, asphalt paving, reinforced concrete, trench backfill, and utility improvements

Page 715 of 989 ends

Jade Sill 2

SELECT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Deputy Grading Inspector, City of Laguna Niguel (2023–Present) Provides grading inspection and construction observation services for public and private development projects, including field coordination, earthwork observation, contractor communication, documentation of field conditions, and verification of compliance with approved grading plans and geotechnical recommendations.

Deputy Public Works Inspector, City of Dana Point (2024–Present) Provides public works inspection services supporting municipal capital improvement and maintenance projects, including field observation of construction activities, coordination with contractors and City staff, verification of compliance with approved plans and specifications, documentation of field activities, and observation/testing of pavement, utility, and civil improvements.

Upgrade Coastal Junction (C-10) Valve Replacement Project, SCWD, Irvine, CA: As Senior Engineering Technician for this project, my responsibilities included: Soil backfill observation/testing and special inspection for new flow meters, flow control valves, isolation valves, pipelines, and new reinforced concrete vault and lid.

Joint Transmission Main (JTM) J2R4 Manway Installation and Vault, SCWD, Aliso Viejo, CA (2019): As Senior Engineering Technician for this project, my responsibilities included: Backfill observation/testing and reinforced concrete inspection/testing.

JTM Vaults 1, 2 and 4 Upgrade Project, SCWD, Laguna Woods, CA (2019): As Senior Engineering Technician for this project, my responsibilities included. Soil observation/testing and reinforced concrete inspection/testing.

JRWSS Water Valve Replacement Project, Victoria Blvd., Doheny Park Rd. and Costco Access Rd., SCWD, Capistrano Beach, CA (2016): As Senior Engineering Technician for this project, my responsibilities included: Waterline trench backfill observation and soil/asphalt observation/testing.

Ritz Cove Lift Station No. 6 Reclaimed Waterline Project, SCWD, Monarch Beach, CA (2016): As Senior Engineering Technician for this project, my responsibilities included: Waterline trench backfill observation/testing.

Phases 1 and 2 Dana Point Town Center Infrastructure Improvements, SCWD, Dana Point, CA (2014 - 2015): As Senior Engineering Technician for this project, my responsibilities included: Pipeline installation observation, trench backfill observation/testing for domestic and reclaimed water lines, sewer lines, fire lines, as well as, concrete subgrade, and asphalt subgrade and asphalt paving observation/testing.

Voyager Water and Sewer Line Improvements, MNWD, Laguna Niguel, CA (2022): As Senior Engineering Technician for this project, my responsibilities include: Pipeline installation observation, trench backfill observation, and soil/asphalt observation/testing.

Bradt Reservoir Paving, Phase 2, SCWD, San Clemente, CA: (2019) As Senior Engineering Technician for this project, my responsibilities included: Asphalt dig out repairs and asphalt testing.

Valve replacement at Stonehill/Del Obispo, SCWD, Dana Point, CA: (2022) As Senior Engineering Technician for this project, my responsibilities include: Trench backfill observation and soil and asphalt testing.

Emergency Repair of Los Monteros Recycled Water Line, SCWD, Monarch Beach, CA: (2020). As Senior Engineering Technician for this project, my responsibilities included: Trench backfill observation and soil and asphalt testing.

Page 716 of 989 ends

Appendix B
Required Forms

Page 717 of 989 ends
Page 718 of 989 ends
Page 719 of 989 ends
Page 720 of 989 ends
Page 721 of 989 ends
Page 722 of 989 ends
Page 723 of 989 ends
Page 724 of 989 ends
Page 725 of 989 ends
Page 726 of 989 ends
Page 727 of 989 ends

2026 SCHEDULE OF CHARGES

CITY OF LAGUNA HILLS PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING SERVICES

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Document Preparation and Project Services $ 112.00/hour CAD/GIS Design Engineer $ 135.00/hour
Staff Engineer or Geologist $ 180.00/hour
Senior Staff Engineer or Geologist $ 197.00/hour
Project Engineer or Geologist $ 220.00/hour
Senior Engineer or Geologist $ 260.00/hour
Associate Engineer or Geologist $ 280.00/hour
Principal/Director $ 295.00/hour

FIELD INSPECTION & TESTING SERVICES
Staff Engineering Technician $ 115.00/hour*
• Services provided under direct supervision of a Senior Engineering Technician Senior Engineering Technician $ 132.00/hour*
• Inspections for soils/grading, asphalt, concrete, batch plants, piles/caissons, etc. • Certifications by ACI, ICC, Caltrans, local jurisdictions, etc.

Registered Special Inspector (No 4-hour minimum) $ 132.00/hour* • Certifications by ACI, ICC, Caltrans, local jurisdictions, etc. • Reinforced concrete, Post-Tension, Masonry, Welding, Bolting, Fireproofing Instrumentation Engineer $ 180.00/hour
• Slope inclinometer and Piezometer monitoring
• Manometer for floor-level surveys
• Stormwater turbidity & pH meter
• Groundwater monitoring - pressure transducer, datalogger, water chemistry meter, etc. • Pipeline video camera for drains, wells, etc.

Engineering Seismological Technician (includes 3-channel seismograph) $ 180.00/hour • Blast vibration monitoring
• Construction vibration & noise monitoring (pile driving, drilling, demolition, etc.) *Notes:
(1) Rates include vehicle, nuclear density gauge, and equipment for testing, inspection, and sampling. (2) No 4-hour minimum charges apply, except for night work. (3) Overtime is charged at 1.5 times the base rate. Overtime is defined as time worked on the project in excess of 8 hours per day and all time on Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays. (4) Prevailing Wage projects, additional hourly surcharge for Field Personnel per CA Labor Code §1720, et seq. Add $ 43.00/hour

LABORATORY TESTING SERVICES
Laboratory Testing $ 145.00/hour
(For special materials testing and laboratory costs on a per-test basis, see GMU’s Laboratory Fee Schedule)

OTHER CHARGES
Outside Services Cost + 15%
Reimbursables & Reprographics Cost

Page 728 of 989 ends

05/2026 – Reformatted JJA
13 Exhibit “B” InsuranceSpecifications

Page 729 of 989 ends

05/2026 – Reformatted JJA
14 EXHIBIT “B” INSURANCE SPECIFICATIONS
Without limiting CONSULTANT’s indemnification of CITY, and prior to performing any work under this AGREEMENT or receiving any compensation, CONSULTANT shall obtain, provide and maintain at its own expense during the term of this AGREEMENT, policies of insurance of the type and amounts described below and in a form that is satisfactory to CITY.

General liability insurance. CONSULTANT shall maintain commercial general liability insurance with coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CG 00 01, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate, for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage. The policy must include contractual liability that has not been amended. Any endorsement restricting standard ISO “insured contract” language will not be accepted. The policy shall name the City of Laguna Hills, and its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers as additional insureds.

Umbrella or excess liability insurance. [If required to meet higher limits].

Umbrella liability insurance requirements. CONSULTANT shall obtain and maintain an umbrella liability insurance policy that offers comprehensive coverage. This policy must include coverage for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage, and it should extend to encompass commercial general liability, automobile liability, and employer’s liability. The policy must incorporate the following terms and conditions:
• Drop-down feature. This feature activates if any primary insurance becomes partially or wholly uncollectible for any reason, excluding the bankruptcy or insolvency of the primary insurer.
• Claims handling. Coverage must be administered on a “pay on behalf of” basis, as opposed to reimbursement model, to ensure direct payment of claims by the insurer. • Concurrency of coverage. The policy effective dates must align with those of the underlying primary insurance policies to ensure continuous coverage.

Excess liability insurance requirements. The CONSULTANT shall obtain and maintain an excess liability insurance policy. This policy must be structured to provide additional coverage over the CONSULTANT’s existing commercial general liability, automobile liability, and employer’s liability policies. The requirements for the policy are as follows:
• Follow-form coverage. The policy adheres strictly to the terms and conditions of the underlying policies, ensuring seamless integration of coverage. • Drop-down provision. This provision states that the excess policy will respond as primary coverage in the event that the underlying insurer is unable to pay a claim due to insolvency, unless an insolvency exclusion specifically applies. • Claims handling. Coverage must be administered on a “pay on behalf of” basis, as opposed to a reimbursement model, to ensure direct payment of claims by the insurer.
• Concurrency of coverage. The policy effective dates must align with those of the underlying policies to prevent any gaps in coverage.

Automobile liability insurance. CONSULTANT shall maintain automobile insurance at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CA 00 01 covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of CONSULTANT arising out of or in connection with the work to be performed under this AGREEMENT, including coverage for any owned, hired, non-owned, or rented vehicles, in an amount not less than$1,000,000.00 combined single limit for each accident.

Page 730 of 989 ends

05/2026 – Reformatted JJA
15 Workers’ compensation insurance. CONSULTANT shall maintain Workers’ Compensation Insurance (Statutory Limits) and Employer’s Liability Insurance (with limits of at least $1,000,000 dollars). CONSULTANT shall submit to CITY, along with the certificate of insurance, a Waiver of Subrogation endorsement in favor of CITY, its officers, agents, employees, and volunteers.

Professional liability (errors & omissions) insurance. CONSULTANT shall maintain professional liability insurance that covers the services to be performed in connection with this AGREEMENT, in the minimum amount of $1,000,000 per claim and in the aggregate. Any policy inception date, continuity date, or retroactive date must be before the effective date of this AGREEMENT and CONSULTANT agrees to maintain continuous coverage through a period of no less than three years after completion of the services required by this AGREEMENT.

Other provisions or requirements:

Proof of insurance. CONSULTANT shall provide certificates of insurance and required endorsements to CITY as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein. Insurance certificates and endorsements must be approved by CITY prior to commencement of performance. Current certification of insurance shall be kept on file with CITY for the contract period and any additional length of time required thereafter. CITY reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time.

Duration of coverage. CONSULTANT shall procure and maintain for the contract period and any additional length of time required thereafter, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property, or financial loss, which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by CONSULTANT, their agents, representatives, employees, or subconsultants/ subcontractors. If this AGREEMENT involves construction, CONSULTANT must maintain general liability and umbrella or excess liability insurance for as long as there is a statutory exposure to completed operations claims. CITY and its officers, officials, employees, and agents shall continue as additional insureds under such policies.

Primary/noncontributing. Coverage provided by CONSULTANT shall be primary and any insurance or self-insurance procured or maintained by CITY shall not be required to contribute with it. The limits of insurance required herein may be satisfied by a combination of primary and umbrella or excess insurance. Any umbrella or excess insurance shall contain or be endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and non-contributory basis for the benefit of CITY before the CITY’s own insurance or self-insurance shall be called upon to protect it as a named insured.

CITY’s rights of enforcement. In the event any policy of insurance required under this AGREEMENT does not comply with these specifications or is canceled and not replaced, CITY has the right but not the duty to obtain the insurance it deems necessary and any premium paid by CITY will be promptly reimbursed by CONSULTANT or CITY will withhold amounts sufficient to pay premium from CONSULTANT’s payments. In the alternative, CITY may cancel this AGREEMENT.

Acceptable insurers. All insurance policies shall be issued by an insurance company currently authorized by the Insurance Commissioner to transact business of insurance in the State of California, with an assigned policyholders’ Rating of A- (or higher) and Financial Size Category Class VII (or larger) in accordance with the latest edition of Best’s Key Rating Guide, unless otherwise approved by CITY.

Waiver of subrogation. With the exception of Professional Liability, all insurance coverage maintained or procured pursuant to this AGREEMENT shall be endorsed to waive subrogation

Page 731 of 989 ends

05/2026 – Reformatted JJA
16 against CITY, its elected or appointed officers, agents, officials, employees, and volunteers or shall specifically allow CONSULTANT or others providing insurance evidence in compliance with these specifications to waive their right of recovery prior to a loss. CONSULTANT hereby waives its own right of recovery against CITY and shall require similar written express waivers and insurance clauses from each of its subconsultants/subcontractors.

Enforcement of contract provisions (non estoppel). CONSULTANT acknowledges and agrees that any actual or alleged failure on the part of CITY to inform CONSULTANT of noncompliance with any requirement imposes no additional obligations on the CITY nor does it waive any rights hereunder.

Requirements not limiting. Requirements of specific coverage features or limits contained in this Section are not intended as a limitation on coverage, limits on other requirements, or a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any insurance. Specific reference to a given coverage feature is for purposes of clarification only as it pertains to a given issue and is not intended by any party or insured to be all inclusive, or to the exclusion of other coverage, or a waiver of any type. If the CONSULTANT maintains higher limits than the minimums shown above, the CITY requires and shall be entitled to coverage for the higher limits maintained by the CONSULTANT.

Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the CITY.

Notice of cancellation. CONSULTANT agrees to oblige its insurance agent or broker and insurers to provide to CITY with a thirty (30) day notice of cancellation (except for nonpayment for which a ten (10) day notice is required) or nonrenewal of coverage for each required coverage. If any of the CONSULTANT’s insurers are unwilling to provide such notice, then Consultant shall have the responsibility of notifying the CITY immediately in the event of CONSULTANT’s failure to renew any of the required insurance coverages, or insurer’s cancellation or non-renewal.

Additional insured status. General liability, automobile liability, and umbrella/excess liability insurance policies shall provide or be endorsed to provide that CITY and its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers shall be additional insureds under such policies.

Prohibition of undisclosed coverage limitations. None of the coverages required herein will be in compliance with these requirements if they include any limiting endorsement of any kind that has not been first submitted to CITY and approved of in writing.

Separation of insureds. A severability of interests provision must apply for all additional insureds ensuring that Consultant’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the insurer’s limits of liability. The policy(ies) shall not contain any cross-liability exclusions.

Pass through clause. CONSULTANT agrees to ensure that its subconsultants, subcontractors, and any other party who is brought onto or involved in the project/service by CONSULTANT (hereinafter collectively “subcontractor”), provide the same minimum insurance coverage and endorsements required of CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT agrees to monitor and review all such coverage and assumes all responsibility for ensuring that such coverage is provided in conformity with the requirements of this section. However, in the event CONSULTANT’s subcontractor cannot comply with this requirement, which proof must be submitted to the CITY, CONSULTANT shall be required to ensure that its subcontractor provide and maintain insurance coverage and endorsements sufficient to the specific risk of exposure involved with subcontractor’s scope of work and services, with limits less than required of the CONSULTANT, but in all other terms consistent with the CONSULTANT’s requirements under this agreement. This provision does not relieve the CONSULTANT of its contractual obligations under the agreement and/or limit its

Page 732 of 989 ends

05/2026 – Reformatted JJA
17 liability to the amount of insurance coverage provided by its subcontractors. This provision is intended solely to provide CONSULTANT with the ability to utilize a subcontractor who may be otherwise qualified to perform the work or services but may not carry the same insurance limits as required of the CONSULTANT under this agreement given the limited scope of work or services provided by the subcontractor. CONSULTANT agrees that upon request, all agreements with subcontractors, and others engaged in the project, will be submitted to CITY for review.

City’s right to revise specifications. CITY reserves the right at any time during the term of the AGREEMENT to change the amounts and types of insurance required by giving CONSULTANT ninety (90) days advance written notice of such change. If such change results in substantial additional cost to CONSULTANT, CITY and CONSULTANT may renegotiate CONSULTANT’s compensation.

Self-insured retentions. Any self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by CITY.

CITY reserves the right to require that self-insured retentions be eliminated, lowered, or replaced by a deductible, or require proof of ability to pay losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses within the retention through confirmation from the underwriter. Self-insurance will not be considered to comply with these specifications unless approved by CITY.

Timely notice of claims. CONSULTANT shall give CITY prompt and timely notice of claims made or suits instituted that arise out of or result from CONSULTANT’s performance under this AGREEMENT, and that involve or may involve coverage under any of the required liability policies.

Additional insurance. CONSULTANT shall also procure and maintain, at its own cost and expense, any additional kinds of insurance, which in its own judgment may be necessary for its proper protection and prosecution of the work.

Page 733 of 989 ends

05/2026 – Reformatted JJA
1 AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES
CON –
GMU Geotechnical, Inc. dba GMU Engineers and Geologists On-Call Public Works/Engineering Consulting and Support Services This AGREEMENT is made and effective as of the EFFECTIVE DATE, by and between the City of Laguna Hills, a municipal corporation ("CITY") and GMU Geotechnical, Inc. dba GMU Engineers and Geologists ("CONSULTANT"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:

1. TERM
This AGREEMENT shall commence on July 14, 2026, (“EFFECTIVE DATE”) and remain and continue in effect until all tasks described herein are completed but in no event later than August 31, 2029, unless sooner terminated or extended pursuant to the provisions of this AGREEMENT. Notwithstanding this limit on term, some duties and obligations may survive the termination, lapse, or completion of this AGREEMENT.

2. SERVICES
CONSULTANT shall perform the tasks described and set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. CONSULTANT shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit A.

3. NOTICE TO PROCEED
CONSULTANT shall not perform any work or be entitled to any compensation under this AGREEMENT until a written Notice to Proceed is issued by CITY. The Notice to Proceed shall not issue unless and until CONSULTANT submits proof, satisfactory to CITY, of its procurement of appropriate insurance required by this AGREEMENT. The failure of CONSULTANT to submit proof of appropriate insurance within 10 days of the EFFECTIVE DATE is a material breach and shall constitute cause for immediate termination of this AGREEMENT by CITY.

4. PERFORMANCE
CONSULTANT shall at all times faithfully, competently, and to the best of their ability, experience, and talent perform all tasks described herein. CONSULTANT shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of CONSULTANT hereunder in meeting its obligations under this AGREEMENT.

5. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE
Time is of the essence and in the performance of this AGREEMENT. CONSULTANT shall diligently and continuously perform the work in accordance with the agreed in Exhibit A.

CONSULTANT shall not be liable for delays due to causes beyond its control provided that CONSULTANT gives City written notice within ten (10) days after CONSULTANT becomes aware of the event, and uses reasonable efforts to mitigate any damages.

6. CITY MANAGEMENT
Lisa Bates shall represent CITY in all matters pertaining to the administration of this AGREEMENT, including review and approval of all materials submitted by CONSULTANT, but not including the authority to enlarge the tasks to be performed or change the compensation due to CONSULTANT. The City Manager shall be authorized to act on CITY’S behalf and to execute all necessary documents that enlarge the tasks to be performed or change CONSULTANT's compensation, subject to Section 6 hereof.

Page 734 of 989 ends

05/2026 – Reformatted JJA
2 7. PAYMENT
(a) CITY agrees to pay CONSULTANT in accordance with the payment rates, terms, and schedule of payment set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full. This amount shall not exceed Four Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($450,000.00) (“TOTAL CONTRACT SUM”) for the total term of this AGREEMENT unless additional payment is approved as provided in this AGREEMENT. (b) CONSULTANT shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this AGREEMENT that are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Manager. This written authorization requirement cannot be waived. CONSULTANT shall be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by the City Manager and CONSULTANT at the time CITY’s written authorization is given to CONSULTANT for the performance of said additional services. The City Manager’s authority to approve additional compensation is subject to Laguna Hills Municipal Code section 3.08.150. Approval of additional compensation that exceeds the City Manager’s authority as specified in Laguna Hills Municipal Code section 3.08.150 must be obtained from the City Council.
(c) CONSULTANT shall submit reasonably detailed invoices monthly for actual services performed and, as applicable, equipment and materials acquired. Invoices shall be submitted on or about the first business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to all non-disputed fees. If the CITY disputes ant of CONSULTANT’s fees it shall give written notice to CONSULTANT within 30 days of receipt of an invoice of any disputed fess set forth on the invoice.

8. PUBLIC WORK
Notice is provided pursuant to Labor Code Section 1781 that all or a portion of the work contemplated in this AGREEMENT may constitute a “public work” as defined in Chapter 1, Part 7, and Division 2 of the Labor Code, to which Section 1771 applies. If all or a portion of the work contemplated under this AGREEMENT constitutes “public work,” then CONSULTANT shall pay prevailing wages, unless exempt, on those portions of the work which require payment of prevailing wages under the prevailing wage laws (Labor Code, §§ 1720 et seq.), and shall comply with the following to the extent applicable:
(a) Prevailing Wage Rates. Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1773.2, copies of the prevailing rate of per diem wages can be found at the California Department of Industrial Relations’ official website (www.dir.ca.go), which shall be made available to any interested party upon request. CONSULTANT shall post a copy of the determination of the director of the prevailing rate of per diem wages at each job site. Said per diem wages are deemed to include employer payments for health and welfare, pension, vacation and travel time, and subsistence pay, all in accordance with Section 1773.1 of the Labor Code. (b) Payroll Records. The provisions of Section 1776 of the Labor Code regarding the preparation, maintenance, and filing of payroll records are applicable to this AGREEMENT.

CONSULTANT and each subconsultant shall keep accurate payroll records showing the name, address, social security number, work classification, straight time, and overtime hours worked each day and week, and the actual per diem wages paid to each journeyman, apprentice, worker, or other employee employed by them in connection with the public work. Certified payroll records shall be on forms provided by the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement or

Page 735 of 989 ends

05/2026 – Reformatted JJA
3 contain the same information. CONSULTANT’S AND ANY SUBCONSULTANT’S PAYROLL RECORDS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO CITY ON A WEEKLY BASIS. CONSULTANT SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SUBMITTAL OF SUBCONSULTANT’S PAYROLL RECORDS. Additionally, CONSULTANT or subconsultant has ten (10) days in which to comply subsequent to receipt of a written notice requesting the records enumerated in Section 1776, subdivision (a), of the Labor Code. In the event that CONSULTANT or subconsultant fails to comply within the ten (10) day period, they shall, as a penalty to CITY, forfeit One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each worker, until strict compliance is effectuated. CITY may deduct this penalty from any monies due or that may become due CONSULTANT under this AGREEMENT. (c) Penalty. CONSULTANT and any subconsultant under CONSULTANT shall, as a penalty to CITY, forfeit not more than Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00) for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each worker paid (either by CONSULTANT or any subconsultant under CONSULTANT) less than the prevailing rate set forth herein on the work provided for in this AGREEMENT. CITY may deduct the penalty from any monies due or that may become due CONSULTANT under this AGREEMENT. The difference between the prevailing wage rates and the amount paid to each worker for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for which each worker was paid less than the prevailing wage rate shall also be paid to each worker by CONSULTANT or subconsultant, in accordance with Section 1775 of the Labor Code of the State of California.
(d) Apprentices. If applicable, the provisions of Labor Code Section 1777.5 requiring the use of apprentices in certain ratios to journeymen are hereby imposed upon CONSULTANT and each subconsultant.
(e) Legal Day’s Work. In the performance of this AGREEMENT, not more than eight (8) hours shall constitute a day’s work, and CONSULTANT shall not require more than eight (8) hours of labor in a day from any person employed by them hereunder except as provided in Labor Code Section 1815. CONSULTANT and each subconsultant shall conform to Article 3, Chapter 1, Part 7 (Sections 1810 et seq.), of the Labor Code of the State of California, and it is agreed that CONSULTANT shall forfeit to CITY as a penalty the sum of TwentyFive Dollars ($25.00) for each worker employed in the execution of this AGREEMENT by CONSULTANT or any subconsultant for each calendar day during which any worker is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in any one (1) calendar day and forty (40) hours in any one (1) week in violation of said article. CITY may deduct this penalty from any monies due or that may become due pursuant to this AGREEMENT.

9. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE (a) CITY may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this AGREEMENT, or any portion hereof, by serving upon CONSULTANT, at least thirty (30) days prior written notice. CITY shall not be obligated to explain its reasons for termination. Upon receipt of said notice, CONSULTANT shall immediately cease all work under this AGREEMENT, unless the notice provides otherwise. If CITY suspends or terminates a portion of this AGREEMENT such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this AGREEMENT. (b) In the event this AGREEMENT is suspended or terminated pursuant to this section, CITY shall pay to CONSULTANT the actual value of the work performed up to the time of suspension or termination, provided that the work performed is performed in accordance to this AGREEMENT. Upon suspension or termination of the AGREEMENT pursuant to this section, CONSULTANT will, as a precondition to being compensated, submit

Page 736 of 989 ends

05/2026 – Reformatted JJA
4 an invoice to CITY detailing work performed up to the time of suspension or termination within thirty (30) days of the effective date of suspension or termination.

10. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT
(a) CONSULTANT's failure to comply with the provisions of this AGREEMENT shall constitute a material default. In the event that CONSULTANT is in default for cause under the terms of this AGREEMENT, CITY shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating CONSULTANT for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this AGREEMENT immediately by written notice to CONSULTANT. If such failure by the CONSULTANT to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond CONSULTANT's control, and without fault or negligence of CONSULTANT, it shall not be considered a default.
(b) As an alternative to the procedure for immediate termination for default set forth in subparagraph (a), if CITY determines that CONSULTANT is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this AGREEMENT, CITY may in its discretion cause to be served upon CONSULTANT a written notice of the default and demand to cure.

CONSULTANT shall have ten (10) calendar days after service upon it of said notice to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that CONSULTANT fails to cure its default within such period of time, CITY shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this AGREEMENT, to terminate this AGREEMENT without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity, or under this AGREEMENT.

11. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS
(a) CONSULTANT shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to the plans, specifications, estimates, drawings, design calculations, letters, reports, testing results, and other such information including as-built records as required by CITY that relate to the performance of services under this AGREEMENT. CONSULTANT shall maintain adequate records of services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services.

All such records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identified and readily accessible. CONSULTANT shall provide free access to the representatives of CITY or its designees at reasonable times to such books and records; shall give CITY the right to examine and audit said books and records; shall permit CITY to make copies and transcripts therefrom as necessary; and shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to this AGREEMENT. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years after receipt of final payment. (b) Upon completion of, or in the event of termination, or suspension of this AGREEMENT, all original documents, plans, specifications, engineer’s estimates, electronic files, and other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this AGREEMENT shall become the sole property of CITY and may be used, reused, or otherwise disposed of by CITY without the permission of CONSULTANT. If CITY modifies or otherwise utilizes the CONSULTANT’s documents for any purpose not related to this Agreement, it does so at its sole risk and without any liability on the part of CONSULTANT.

With respect to computer files, CONSULTANT shall make available to CITY, upon reasonable written request by CITY, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring, and printing computer files.

12. PATENT AND COPYRIGHT INFRINGMENT
(a) To the fullest extent permitted by law, and in lieu of any other warranty by CITY or

Page 737 of 989 ends

05/2026 – Reformatted JJA
5 CONSULTANT against patent or copyright infringement, statutory or otherwise, it is agreed that CONSULTANT shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless at its expense any claim or suit against CITY, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers, on account of any allegation that any item furnished under this AGREEMENT, or the normal use or sale thereof arising out of the performance of this AGREEMENT, infringes upon any U.S. or foreign, letters patent or copyright or other intellectual property right, and CONSULTANT shall pay all costs and damages finally awarded in any such suit or claim, provided that CONSULTANT is promptly notified in writing of the suit or claim and given authority, information and assistance at CONSULTANT’S expense for the defense of same, and provided such suit or claim arises out of, pertains to, or is related to the alleged negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct of CONSULTANT. However, CONSULTANT will not indemnify CITY if the suit or claim results from: (1) CITY’s alteration of a deliverable, such that CITY’S alteration of such deliverable created the infringement upon any U.S. or foreign, letters patent or copyright; or (2) the use of a deliverable in combination with other material not provided by CONSULTANT when it is such use in combination which infringes upon an existing U.S. or foreign letters patent or copyright. (b) CONSULTANT shall have control of the defense of any such claim or suit and all negotiations for settlement thereof, CONSULTANT shall not be obligated to indemnify CITY under any settlement made without CONSULTANT’S consent or in the event CITY fails to cooperate in the defense of any suit or claim, provided, however, that such defense shall be at CONSULTANT’S expense. If the use or sale of such item is enjoined as a result of the suit or claim, CONSULTANT, at no expense to CITY, shall obtain for CITY the right to use and sell the item, or shall substitute an equivalent item acceptable to CITY and extend this patent and copyright indemnity thereto.

13. INSURANCE
Prior to performing any work or receiving any compensation under this AGREEMENT, CONSULTANT shall obtain, and thereafter maintain for the duration of this AGREEMENT, insurance coverage as specified in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. This duty or obligation shall survive the lapse, termination, or completion of this AGREEMENT.

14. NON-LIABILITY OF CITY OFFICERS, AGENTS, EMPLOYEES AND VOLUNTEERS No officer, agent, employee and/or volunteer of the CITY shall be personally liable to the CONSULTANT, or any successor-in-interest, in the event of any default or breach by the CITY or for any amount which may become due to the CONSULTANT or to its successor, or for breach of any obligation of the terms of this AGREEMENT.

15. WARRANTY FOR GOODS
(a) If this AGREEMENT includes the purchase of equipment, supplies, or chattel (hereafter “GOODS”), CONSULTANT shall provide the following warranty of said GOODS, or obtain a warranty from the manufacturer and/or retailer with provisions equal to or exceeding those specified in this Section. In the event the manufacturer’s warranty or retailer’s warranty do not equal or exceed the protections specified in this Section, CONSULTANT agrees to provide said warranty protections. The warranty described hereunder extends to the original purchaser of the GOODS warranted under the warranty, and to each transferee owner of the GOODS. The term of this warranty begins on the date the GOODS are delivered to and accepted by CITY, and continues therefrom. CONSULTANT warrants that:
(1) The GOODS will function properly under normal use, will be of good workmanship, free from defect, of merchantable quality, and fit for CITY’s intended use; (2) The GOODS will fully comply with any specifications provided by

Page 738 of 989 ends

05/2026 – Reformatted JJA
6 CITY and any samples or documentation provided by CONSULTANT; (3) The GOODS will be free of any security interests, liens, or encumbrances and CONSULTANT has title to the GOODS;
(4) The GOODS will not violate any intellectual property rights of any third party;
(5) The GOODS will be delivered free of the rightful claim of a third person by way of infringement; and
(6) The GOODS are merchantable in accordance with Commercial Code Section 2314.
(b) The warranty listed above is in addition to any other warranties made by CONSULTANT, the manufacturer, retailer, or imposed by law. All warranties will survive inspection and payment by CITY and are assignable to CITY’s successors and assigns. If any GOODS do not meet the warranty, CITY may, at CITY’s option, and without additional cost to CITY:
(1) Require CONSULTANT to repair or replace the GOODS until the GOODS meet the warranty. If CONSULTANT cannot replace the GOODS and repair either is not commercially practicable or cannot be made within five (5) days of CITY’s written notice, CONSULTANT will refund the purchase price of the GOODS; (2) Return any of the GOODS to CONSULTANT at CONSULTANT’s expense for a full refund;
(3) Correct the nonconformance and charge CONSULTANT for the costs to make the correction; or
(4) Engage a third party to provide substitute GOODS and charge CONSULTANT for the costs of obtaining the substitute GOODS from the third party.

16. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
(a) CONSULTANT is and shall at all times remain as to the CITY a wholly independent contractor having only the contractual duties and obligations agreed upon as memorialized in this AGREEMENT. The personnel performing the services under this AGREEMENT on behalf of CONSULTANT shall at all times be under CONSULTANT's exclusive direction and control.

Neither CITY nor any of its officers, officials, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of CONSULTANT or any of CONSULTANT's officers, employees, or agents, except as set forth in this AGREEMENT. CONSULTANT shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees, or agents are in any manner officers, employees, or agents of the CITY. CONSULTANT shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation, or liability whatsoever against CITY, or bind CITY in any manner, whether in law or equity.
(b) No employee benefits shall be available to CONSULTANT in connection with the performance of this AGREEMENT. Except for the fees paid to CONSULTANT as provided in this AGREEMENT, CITY shall not pay, nor be deemed to have paid or delivered, salaries, wages, or other compensation to CONSULTANT for performing services hereunder for CITY.

CITY shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to CONSULTANT for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. In addition to the indemnification provisions of Section 11, CONSULTANT shall indemnify, defend, and hold CITY harmless from claims or liability arising from CONSULTANT’s employees for CITY benefits including, but not limited to, pension, health benefits, holiday, vacations, etc. (c) If CONSULTANT, or any of its employees, agens, or subconsultants performing work under this AGREEMENT, claims or is determined by the court or the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (PERS) to qualify as a CITY employee for PERS purposes,

Page 739 of 989 ends

05/2026 – Reformatted JJA
7 CONSULTANT shall defend, indemnify and hold the CITY harmless from any related costs.

These costs include all required PERS contributions (both employee and employer shares), as well as associated penalties and interest that would otherwise be the CITY’s responsibility.

17. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES
CONSULTANT shall keep itself informed of State and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect its requirements under this Agreement, and those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service, duties, and obligations pursuant to this AGREEMENT. CONSULTANT shall at all times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. CITY, and its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of CONSULTANT to comply with this Section.

This section shall survive, without limitation, the termination, lapse or completion of this Agreement.

18. COVENANT AGAINST DISCRIMINATION
In connection with its performance under this AGREEMENT, CONSULTANT shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, disability, medical condition, religion, color, sex, sexual orientation, age, marital status, ancestry, or national origin. CONSULTANT shall ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during their employment, without regard to their race, disability, medical condition, religion, color, sex, sexual orientation, age, marital status, ancestry, or national origin. Such actions shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship.

19. POLITICAL REFORM ACT
If the Political Reform Act requires CONSULTANT to file a Form 700, then CONSULTANT must file a Form 700 with full disclosure within thirty 30 days of assuming office and thereafter must file an annual statement for each calendar year of this AGREEMENT.

20. CONFLICT OF INTEREST
No officer, agent or employee of the CITY shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this AGREEMENT nor shall any such officer or employee participate in any decision relating to the AGREEMENT which affects his or her financial interest or the financial interest of any corporation, partnership, or association in which they are, directly or indirectly, interested in violation of any state statute or regulation. CONSULTANT represents and warrants that it has not paid or given and will not pay or give any third party, including any CITY officer, agent, employee any money or other consideration in exchange for obtaining this AGREEMENT.

21. UNDUE INFLUENCE
CONSULTANT declares and warrants that no undue influence or pressure is used against or in concert with any officer or employee of CITY in connection with the award, terms, or implementation of this AGREEMENT, including any method of coercion, confidential financial arrangement, or financial inducement. No officer or employee of the CITY will receive compensation, directly or indirectly, from CONSULTANT, or from any officer, employee, or agent of CONSULTANT, in connection with the award of this AGREEMENT or any work to be conducted as a result of this AGREEMENT. Violation of this section shall be a material breach of this AGREEMENT entitling CITY to any and all remedies at law or in equity.

Page 740 of 989 ends

05/2026 – Reformatted JJA
8 22. NO BENEFIT TO ARISE TO LOCAL EMPLOYEES
No member, officer, or employee of CITY, or their designees or agents, and no public official who exercises authority over or responsibilities with respect to the project during their tenure or for one year thereafter, shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in any agreement or sub-agreement, or the proceeds thereof, for work to be performed in connection with this AGREEMENT.

23. RELEASE OF INFORMATION / CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
(a) All information gained by CONSULTANT in performance of this AGREEMENT shall be considered confidential and shall not be released by CONSULTANT without CITY’s prior written authorization. CONSULTANT, its officers, employees, agents, or subconsultants, shall not without written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the Attorney for the City, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories, or other information concerning the work performed under this AGREEMENT or relating to any project or property located within the CITY. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered “voluntary” provided CONSULTANT gives CITY notice of such court order or subpoena.
(b) CONSULTANT shall promptly notify CITY should CONSULTANT, its officers, employees, agents, or subconsultants be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, requests for admissions, or other discovery request, court order, or subpoena from any person or party regarding this AGREEMENT and the work performed thereunder or with respect to any project or property located within the CITY. CONSULTANT agrees to cooperate fully with CITY and to provide the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by CONSULTANT.

However, CITY's right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by CITY to control, direct, or rewrite said response.

24. SECURITY OF INFORMATION
CONSULTANT shall identify reasonably foreseeable internal and external risks to the privacy and security of personal information acquired during performance of this AGREEMENT that could result in the unauthorized disclosure, misuse, alteration, destruction, or other compromise of the information. CONSULTANT shall regularly assess the sufficiency of any safeguards and information security awareness training in place to control reasonably foreseeable internal and external risks, and evaluate and adjust those safeguards in light of the assessment.

25. NOTICES
Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this AGREEMENT must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, which provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by notice:

CITY CONSULTANT
City of Laguna Hills GMU Geotechnical, Inc.
24035 El Toro Rd 30336 Esperanza
Laguna Hills, CA 92653 Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688

Page 741 of 989 ends

05/2026 – Reformatted JJA
9 Attn: City Clerk Attn: Mike Moscrop, President

26. ASSIGNMENT
CONSULTANT shall not assign the performance of this AGREEMENT, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without the prior written consent of CITY, which the CITY may grant or withhold in its sole and absolute discretion, with no obligation to disclose the basis for its decision to any person, firm, entity, or Party. ☒ [Check if Applicable] CONSULTANT shall provide CITY fourteen (14) days’ notice prior to the departure of any key personnel from CONSULTANT’s employ. Should key personnel leave CONSULTANT’s employ, CITY shall have the option to immediately terminate this AGREEMENT, within three (3) days of the close of said notice period. Upon termination of this AGREEMENT, CONSULTANT’s sole compensation shall be payment for actual services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise agreed to in writing between the City Council and CONSULTANT.
☐ [Check if Applicable] Because of the personal nature of the services to be rendered pursuant to this AGREEMENT, only _______________(“PRINCIPAL”) shall perform the services described in this AGREEMENT. PRINCIPAL may use assistants, under their direct supervision, to perform some of the services under this AGREEMENT. CONSULTANT shall provide CITY fourteen (14) day's notice prior to the departure of PRINCIPAL from CONSULTANT's employ. Should they leave CONSULTANT's employ, CITY shall have the option to immediately terminate this AGREEMENT, within three (3) days of the close of said notice period. Upon termination of this AGREEMENT, CONSULTANT's sole compensation shall be payment for actual services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise agreed to in writing between CITY and CONSULTANT.

27. LICENSES, PERMITS AND FEES
At all times during the term of this AGREEMENT and prior to commencement of any work under this AGREEMENT, CONSULTANT shall have in full force and effect, all licenses and permits required of it by law for the performance of the services described in this AGREEMENT, including, but not limited to, obtaining and maintaining a Laguna Hills business license. This includes payments of all applicable fees and other charges necessary for such compliance and performance.

28. GOVERNING LAW
CITY and CONSULTANT understand and agree that the laws of the State of California, or, as necessary, the laws of the United States Federal government, shall govern the rights, obligations, duties, and liabilities of the parties to this AGREEMENT and also govern the interpretation of this AGREEMENT. Any litigation concerning this AGREEMENT shall take place in Orange County Superior Court or Central District of California Federal District Court.

29. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
This AGREEMENT contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this AGREEMENT. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations, and statements, oral or written, direct or implied, are merged into this AGREEMENT and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this AGREEMENT based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. Each Party has had the opportunity to have this Agreement reviewed by independent legal counsel of its own selection and is not relying on any representations, opinions, or advice of the other Party.

Page 742 of 989 ends

05/2026 – Reformatted JJA
10 30. CONTENTS OF REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL AND PROPOSAL
CONSULTANT is bound by the contents of CITY’s Request for Proposals and the contents of the Proposal submitted by CONSULTANT. In the event of conflict, this AGREEMENT shall take precedence over CITY’s Request for Proposals and CONSULTANT’s Proposal; and CITY’s Request for Proposals shall take precedence over CONSULTANT’s Proposal. No limitation of CONSULTANT’s liability, waiver of rights of CITY, or release of rights or remedies held by CITY, contained in CONSULTANT’s Proposal shall be of any force or effect.

31. INTERPRETATION
In the event of conflict or inconsistency between this AGREEMENT and any other document, including any proposal or Exhibit hereto, this AGREEMENT shall control unless a contrary intent is clearly stated. This AGREEMENT shall be interpreted as though drafted by all parties hereto.

32. MODIFICATION
No modification to this AGREEMENT shall be effective unless it is in writing and signed by authorized representatives of the parties hereto. The written modification requirement cannot be waived.

33. ATTORNEY FEES
In any action or proceeding brought by either party against the other party arising out of or in any way connected to this AGREEMENT, or where any provision hereof is validly asserted as a defense, the parties shall bear their own attorney’s fees, costs, and expenses. Nothing in this provision shall excuse CONSULTANT’s duty to provide CITY with a defense at CONSULTANT’s cost when CITY receives a complaint, petition, or other pleading from a third party requiring CITY to defend itself.

34. SEVERABILITY
If any provision of this AGREEMENT is held to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable by court or jurisdiction, that provision shall be severed from the AGREEMENT, and the remaining provisions shall be in full force and effect.

35. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT
The person or persons executing this AGREEMENT on behalf of CONSULTANT warrants and represents that they have the authority to execute this AGREEMENT on behalf of CONSULTANT and have the authority to bind CONSULTANT to the performance of its obligations hereunder. CONSULTANT agrees that the person executing this AGREEMENT is an authorized agent of the CONSULTANT with the power to bind CONSULTANT to this AGREEMENT.

Page 743 of 989 ends

05/2026 – Reformatted JJA
11 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this AGREEMENT to be executed the day and year first above written.
“CITY”
CITY OF LAGUNA HILLS, a California
Municipal Corporation
“CONSULTANT”
GMU GEOTECHNICAL, INC., a California
Corporation
By:

Bob Wingenroth,
City Manager
By:

Aron Taylor,
Chief Executive Officer
By:

Joshua Stevenson,
City Clerk
By:

Greg Silver,
Senior Prinicipal/Chief Financial Officer
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE
By:

Colin Burns,
Interim City Attorney

Page 744 of 989 ends

05/2026 – Reformatted JJA
12 Exhibit “A” Scope of Services And Payment Terms

Page 745 of 989 ends

Proposal for

ON-CALL BUILDING, PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING

CONSULTING AND SUPPORT SERVICES
RFP Issued: April 6, 2026
Submitted: May 22, 2026
GMU Engineers and Geologists (GMU)
30336 Esperanza
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
949-888-6513
GMU Proposal No. 26.202.00

Page 746 of 989 ends

May 22, 2026
A. COVER LETTER
Ms. Jennifer Lowe
Community Development Director

CITY OF LAGUNA HILLS
24035 El Toro Road
Laguna Hills, CA 92653 GMU Proposal 26.202.00
Subject: Proposal for On-Call Public Works/Engineering Consulting and Support Services, City of Laguna Hills
References: City of Laguna Hills, “Request for Proposals (RFP) On-Call Building, Public Works/Engineering Consulting and Support Services”, issued April 6, 2026
Dear Ms. Lowe:

GMU Engineers and Geologists (GMU) is pleased to submit our proposal to continue to continue providing on-call Public Works and Engineering consulting and support services to the City of Laguna Hills. Established in 1967, GMU is a certified Small Business Enterprise (SBE) with nearly 60 years of experience supporting Southern California public agencies through responsive, practical, and technically sound engineering and construction support services.

GMU understands the City is seeking qualified consultants to supplement Public Works operations through an on-call, task order-based service model that emphasizes responsiveness, technical competence, coordination with City staff, and efficient delivery of municipal projects and services. Since 2023, GMU has proudly supported the City of Laguna Hills through similar on-call services and appreciates the opportunity to continue that relationship.

In response to Section V of the RFP, GMU is proposing to provide the following services:
> Public Works Inspection
> Engineering Plan Check
> Pavement Management Plan Development Services
In addition to the requested services above, GMU can provide the following supplemental services to support City projects and operations:
> Geotechnical Engineering
> Pavement Engineering
> Geotechnical Plan Checking and Report Review
> Geotechnical Observation and Materials Testing
> Pavement Observation and Testing
> Registered Special Inspection
> Grant- and Measure M2-related Pavement Support Services > Other Related Services as Requested by the City

Page 747 of 989 ends
Page 748 of 989 ends

Ms. Jennifer Lowe, CITY OF LAGUNA HILLS
Proposal, On-Call Public Works/Engineering Consulting and Support Services May 22, 2026 3 GMU Proposal 26.202.00

TABLE OF CONTENTS
A. COVER LETTER ................................................................................................................... 1 B. COMPANY DATA.................................................................................................................. 5 B.1 OFFICIAL NAME AND ADDRESS................................................................................... 5 B.2 PRIMARY POINT OF CONTACT..................................................................................... 5 B.3 TYPE OF ENTITY............................................................................................................ 5 B.4 FEDERAL EMPLOYER ID NUMBER............................................................................... 5 B.5 OFFICE LOCATIONS...................................................................................................... 5 B.6 OWNERSHIP................................................................................................................... 5 B.7 BUSINESS NAME ........................................................................................................... 5 B.8 EXPERIENCE.................................................................................................................. 6 B.9 COMPARABLE CONTRACTS......................................................................................... 6 B.10 FAILURES OR REFUSALS TO COMPLETE CONTRACT ............................................ 8 B.11 PRINCIPALS ................................................................................................................. 8 B.12 OTHER FINANCIAL INTERESTS.................................................................................. 8 B.13 LITIGATION/ADVERSE JUDGEMENT HISTORY ......................................................... 8 B.14 TERMINATION OF CONTRACT “FOR CAUSE” HISTORY ........................................... 8 C. RESUMES AND QUALIFICATIONS OF PERSONNEL ......................................................... 9 D. ORGANIZATIONAL CHART.................................................................................................10 E. REFERENCES.....................................................................................................................11 CLIENT REFERENCES........................................................................................................11 F. PROJECT UNDERSTANDING, OVERVIEW AND APPROACH ...........................................12 UNDERSTANDING...............................................................................................................12 APPROACH..........................................................................................................................12 SCOPE OF SERVICES.........................................................................................................13 Public Works Inspection ....................................................................................................13 Engineering Plan Check (Including Geotechnical Review Services)..................................13 Pavement Management Plan Services..............................................................................14 Pavement Engineering ......................................................................................................16 Geotechnical Engineering .................................................................................................18 Construction Materials Testing and Special Inspection......................................................19 PROJECT MANAGEMENT...................................................................................................22 CITY-PROVIDED RESOURCES & ASSISTANCE................................................................22 ADDITIONAL SERVICES......................................................................................................23 Geotechnical Emergency Consulting Services ..................................................................23

Page 749 of 989 ends

Ms. Jennifer Lowe, CITY OF LAGUNA HILLS
Proposal, On-Call Public Works/Engineering Consulting and Support Services May 22, 2026 4 GMU Proposal 26.202.00
Geotechnical Forensic/Expert Witness Consulting Services..............................................24 Geotechnical Monitoring....................................................................................................24 PROJECT CONTROLS.........................................................................................................24 QUALITY CONTROL/QUALITY ASSURANCE (QA/QC).......................................................25 G. SCHEDULE..........................................................................................................................26 H: COMMUNICATION PLAN ....................................................................................................28 I. COMPENSATION/PAYMENT SCHEDULE............................................................................29 J: CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE...........................................................................................29 K: CERTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL........................................................................................29 L: NON-COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT .............................................................................................29 M: ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF ADDENDA.................................................................................29 Appendix A – Key Staff Resumes
Appendix B – Required Forms

Page 750 of 989 ends

Ms. Jennifer Lowe, CITY OF LAGUNA HILLS
Proposal, On-Call Public Works/Engineering Consulting and Support Services May 22, 2026 5 GMU Proposal 26.202.00
B. COMPANY DATA
B.1 OFFICIAL NAME AND ADDRESS
GMU Geotechnical, Inc. is the firm’s legal business name. GMU conducts business under the name GMU Engineers and Geologists (dba) and is located at 30336 Esperanza, Rancho Santa Margarita, California 92688. Office Phone: (949) 888-6513. Fax: (949) 888-1380.

B.2 PRIMARY POINT OF CONTACT
GMU’s primary point of contact for the City of Laguna Hills will be Roger Schlierkamp, MSc, PE, Vice President and Principal Pavement Engineer, and he can be reached at:
30336 Esperanza
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
(949) 888-6513
[email protected].

B.3 TYPE OF ENTITY
GMU Geotechnical is a California S Corporation.

B.4 FEDERAL EMPLOYER ID NUMBER
Federal ID 33-0359134.

B.5 OFFICE LOCATIONS
GMU maintains a single office at the address listed above in Section B.2, where all company operations, project management, engineering services, laboratory testing, and administrative functions are coordinated.

B.6 OWNERSHIP
GMU is not wholly or partially owned by another business organization or individual. The firm is privately owned and operated by four Principals who actively manage the company’s day-to-day operations and remain directly involved in project management, technical oversight, and client service.

B.7 BUSINESS NAME
GMU has continuously operated since 1967. The firm was originally established under the name Evans, Goffman & McCormick. In 1978, the company name was changed to Goffman, McCormick & Urban, Inc. In 2005, the company name was updated to GMU Geotechnical, Inc., under which the firm has operated for the past 21 years. To reflect the firm’s growing range of engineering and consulting services, GMU also registered the dba name GMU Engineers and Geologists.

Page 751 of 989 ends

Ms. Jennifer Lowe, CITY OF LAGUNA HILLS
Proposal, On-Call Public Works/Engineering Consulting and Support Services May 22, 2026 6 GMU Proposal 26.202.00
B.8 EXPERIENCE
GMU has extensive experience providing on-call consulting, engineering, inspection, and testing services to municipalities and public agencies throughout Southern California, including more than 30 years of experience supporting local agency projects and operations similar to those described in the referenced RFP.

B.9 COMPARABLE CONTRACTS
The following list includes representative public agencies for whom GMU has provided on-call services similar to that listed in the RFP within the past 5 years. Given that our comparable contracts are for on-call services and not specific projects, this list below includes descriptions of the work provided and GMU key staff. Additional information for specific example projects for each contract, including the GMU project manager, the cost of construction, and the size of the project, can be provided upon request.

Agency Contract
Term Services Provided Contact Phone GMU Key Staff
City of
Newport
Beach
2009 to
present
On-call geotechnical services, including
pavement engineering, geotechnical
investigation, plan checking, observation
and testing, and materials testing
Andy Tran,
Assistant
City
Engineer
(949)
644-3315
Roger
Schlierkamp
City of
Aliso Viejo
2021 to
present
On-call geotechnical services, including
pavement engineering, geotechnical
investigation, observation and testing, and
materials testing
Shaun
Pelletier,
Director of
Public
Works
(949)
425-2530
Roger
Schlierkamp
City of
Anaheim
2019 to
present
As-needed pavement reports and design
and potholing investigation services;
Geotechnical peer review for Engineering
permits
Carlos
Castellanos,
City
Engineer
(714)
765-6860
Roger
Schlierkamp,
Lisa Bates
City of
Chino Hills
2001 to
present
On-call geotechnical services, including
pavement engineering, geotechnical
investigation, QA/QC geotechnical
monitoring of development projects, plan
checking, observation and testing, and
materials testing
Carl Hassel,
Engineering
Manager
(909)
364-2800
Roger
Schlierkamp,
Lisa Bates
City of
Cypress
2025 to
present
On-call pavement management planning
and pavement design, construction
inspection, geotechnical materials
observation, and program management
Kevin Chin,
Associate
Engineer
(714)
229-6760
Roger
Schlierkamp
City of
Dana
Point
2016 to
present
On-call geotechnical engineering and
inspection services
Matt
Sinacori,
City
Engineer
(949)
248-3554
Roger
Schlierkamp
City of
Garden
Grove
2020 to
present
On-call geotechnical services, including
pavement engineering, geotechnical
investigation, observation and testing, and
materials testing
Mark Uphus,
Senior Civil
Engineer
(714)
741-5192
Roger
Schlierkamp

Page 752 of 989 ends

Ms. Jennifer Lowe, CITY OF LAGUNA HILLS
Proposal, On-Call Public Works/Engineering Consulting and Support Services May 22, 2026 7 GMU Proposal 26.202.00
City of
Huntington
Beach
2021 to
present On-call material testing and engineering
Joe
Fuentes,
Senior Civil
Engineer
(714)
536-5431
Roger
Schlierkamp
City of
Irvine
2016 to
present
On-call geotechnical services, including
pavement engineering, geotechnical
investigation, observation and testing, and
materials testing
Darrell
Hartmen,
Senior Civil
Engineer
(949)
724-7365
Roger
Schlierkamp,
Lisa Bates
City of
Laguna
Hills
2023 to
present
Plan check, geotechnical, and pavement
engineering
Joe Ames,
Assistant
City
Manager
(949)
707-2651
Roger
Schlierkamp,
Lisa Bates
City of
Laguna
Niguel
1998 to
present
On-call geotechnical services, including
pavement engineering, geotechnical
investigation, plan checking, QA/QC
geotechnical monitoring of development
projects, observation and testing, and
materials testing
Kathy
Nguyen,
Engineering
Services
Manager
(949)
362-4337
Roger
Schlierkamp,
Lisa Bates
City of
Lake
Forest
2018 to
present
On-call geotechnical services, including
pavement engineering, geotechnical
investigation, plan checking, QA/QC
geotechnical monitoring of development
projects, observation and testing, and
materials testing
Doug
Erdman,
Assistant
City
Engineer
(949)
461-3480
Roger
Schlierkamp
City of
Mission
Viejo
2018 to
present
On-call geotechnical services, including
pavement engineering, geotechnical
investigation, plan checking, observation
and testing, and materials testing
Rich
Schlesinger,
City
Engineer
(949)
470-3056
Roger
Schlierkamp,
Lisa Bates,
Mike Moscrop
City of
Rancho
Santa
Margarita
2021 to
present
On-call geotechnical services, including
pavement engineering, geotechnical
investigation, plan checking, observation
and testing, and materials testing
Brendan
Dugan,
Public
Works
Director /
City
Engineer
(949)
635-1800
Roger
Schlierkamp,
Lisa Bates
City of
San
Clemente
2020 to
present
On-call geotechnical services for plan
checking
Zak Ponsen,
Senior Civil
Engineer
(949)
361-6119 Lisa Bates
City of
San
Fernando
2021 to
present
Pavement design services, public works
inspection, geotechnical materials
observation and testing, capital
improvement (CIP) program management
Wendell
Johnson,
Director of
Public
Works
(818)
898-1222
Roger
Schlierkamp
City of
San Juan
Capistrano
2020 to
present
On-call geotechnical services, including
pavement engineering, geotechnical
investigation, plan checking, observation
and testing, and materials testing
Jeremy
Hohnbaum,
City
Engineer
(949)
493-5911
Roger
Schlierkamp,
Lisa Bates
City of
Stanton
2023 to
present On-call geotechnical services
Han Sol
Yoo, Civil
Engineer
(714)
379-9222
Roger
Schlierkamp,
Lisa Bates

Page 753 of 989 ends

Ms. Jennifer Lowe, CITY OF LAGUNA HILLS
Proposal, On-Call Public Works/Engineering Consulting and Support Services May 22, 2026 8 GMU Proposal 26.202.00
County of
Orange
2023 to
present
On-call geotechnical services, including
geotechnical investigation, materials
testing, and construction inspection
Krishna
Nadaraja,
Pavement
Maintenanc
e and
Materials
Engineer
(714)
667-8800
Ali Bastani,
Roger
Schlierkamp
Trabuco
Canyon
Water
District
2025 to
present On-call geotechnical services
Lorrie
Lausten,
District
Engineer
(949)
858-0277
Aron Taylor,
Roger
Schlierkamp
Moulton
Niguel
Water
District
2018 to
present On-call geotechnical services
Steve Merk,
Superintend
ent of
Engineering
(949)
831-2500
Aron Taylor,
Roger
Schlierkamp
Santa
Margarita
Water
District
2016 to
present On-call geotechnical services
Dan Ward,
Construction
Engineering
Manager
(949)
459-6420
Aron Taylor,
Roger
Schlierkamp,
Lisa Bates
B.10 FAILURES OR REFUSALS TO COMPLETE CONTRACT
GMU has not failed or refused to complete a contract.

B.11 PRINCIPALS
GMU is privately owned by four Principals:
> Aron Taylor, MSc, PG, CEG, CEO, Senior Principal Engineering Geologist > Mike Moscrop, MSc, PE, GE, President, Senior Principal Geotechnical Engineer > Roger Schlierkamp, MSc, PE, Vice President, Principal Pavement Engineer > Gregory Silver, MSc, PE, GE, Senior Principal / CEO Emeritus GMU is not owned by any other individuals or firms.

B.12 OTHER FINANCIAL INTERESTS
GMU has no financial interests in other lines of business.

B.13 LITIGATION/ADVERSE JUDGEMENT HISTORY
Neither GMU nor any of its officers has any past or ongoing litigation, determinations, or contract terminations of the type described in the RFP. In addition, GMU has not been disciplined by any government agency or professional association.

B.14 TERMINATION OF CONTRACT “FOR CAUSE” HISTORY
GMU has never had a contract terminated “for cause” or which required completion by another party.

Page 754 of 989 ends

Ms. Jennifer Lowe, CITY OF LAGUNA HILLS
Proposal, On-Call Public Works/Engineering Consulting and Support Services May 22, 2026 9 GMU Proposal 26.202.00
C. RESUMES AND QUALIFICATIONS OF PERSONNEL
The personnel listed below will serve as GMU’s primary key staff for the project types identified in this RFP. All key personnel are full-time employees based in GMU’s Rancho Santa Margarita office and have no known conflicts of interest with the City of Laguna Hills. Resumes for the identified key personnel are included in Appendix A.

GMU acknowledges the RFP request for listings of projects and clients associated with key staff.

Given the extensive experience of the proposed team members across numerous public agency assignments, each resume includes representative projects and relevant experience demonstrating the qualifications of the proposed personnel to perform the requested services.

PRIMARY CONTACT
Roger Schlierkamp, MSc,
PE, Vice President /
Principal Pavement
Engineer,
[email protected]
Amina Mannan, PhD,
PE, Senior Engineer,
[email protected]
Mike Moscrop, MSc, PE,
GE, President / Senior
Principal Engineer,
[email protected]
Lisa Bates, PG, CEG,
Associate Geologist /
Director of Municipal
Geotechnical &
Engineering Services
[email protected]
Bryan E. Rodriguez, PG,
CEG, Project Engineering
Geologist,
[email protected]
Jade Sill, ACI, ICC,
Caltrans Certified
Senior Engineering
Technician/Public Works
Inspector,
[email protected]
Note that in the event emergency services are required, any of the personnel listed above may be contacted for geotechnical or pavement engineering support.

Page 755 of 989 ends

Ms. Jennifer Lowe, CITY OF LAGUNA HILLS
Proposal, On-Call Public Works/Engineering Consulting and Support Services May 22, 2026 10 GMU Proposal 26.202.00
D. ORGANIZATIONAL CHART
GMU’s organizational chart is provided. The key personnel listed is not anticipated to change through the life of the agreement. Should an unexpected transition need to occur, a Transition Plan will be implemented. The Transition Plan will be facilitated by our Vice President/Principal Pavement Engineer, Roger Schlierkamp, who is also the primary contact to the City. The plan will include transition of all projects assigned to the outgoing staff to the newly assigned staff with direct oversight by Roger. The transition will be completed such that continuity is maintained, and the City will continue to benefit from timely response, cost effectiveness, and high quality of work.

Page 756 of 989 ends

Ms. Jennifer Lowe, CITY OF LAGUNA HILLS
Proposal, On-Call Public Works/Engineering Consulting and Support Services May 22, 2026 11 GMU Proposal 26.202.00
E. REFERENCES

CLIENT REFERENCES
GMU has provided on-call services to municipalities and governing agencies for over 30 years.

The following references are clients to whom services similar to the referenced RFP have been provided within the past 5 years.
• Shaun Pelletier, Director of Public Works, City of Aliso Viejo 12 Journey, Suite 100, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656, (949) 425-2530 [email protected]
2016-current: On-call geotechnical services including Public Works design and construction, pavement engineering, geotechnical peer review, and emergency geotechnical consulting.
• Matt Sinacori, City Engineer, City of Dana Point
33282 Golden Lantern, Dana Point, CA 92629, (949) 248-3574 [email protected]
2016-current: On-call geotechnical services including Public Works design and construction, pavement engineering, Public Works Inspection, and emergency geotechnical consulting.
• Kathy Kelley, Engineering Services Manager, City of Laguna Niguel 30111 Crown Valley Parkway, Laguna Niguel, CA 92677, (949) 362-4341 [email protected]
1994-current: On-call geotechnical services including Public Works design and construction, pavement engineering, development review/plan checking for Public Works, Planning, Grading, and Building Departments, and emergency geotechnical consulting. • Doug Erdman, Director of Public Works/City Engineer, City of Lake Forest 100 Civic Center Drive, Lake Forest, CA 92630, (949) 282-5233 [email protected]
2018-current: On-call geotechnical services including Public Works design and construction, QA/QC services, and pavement engineering projects. • David A. Webb, Public Works/Director, City of Newport Beach 100 Civic Center, Newport Beach, CA 92660, (949) 644-3328 [email protected]
2009-current: On-call geotechnical services including Public Works design and construction, and pavement engineering projects.

Additional references are available upon request.

Page 757 of 989 ends

Ms. Jennifer Lowe, CITY OF LAGUNA HILLS
Proposal, On-Call Public Works/Engineering Consulting and Support Services May 22, 2026 12 GMU Proposal 26.202.00
F. PROJECT UNDERSTANDING, OVERVIEW AND APPROACH

UNDERSTANDING
Based on our review of the referenced RFP, including the Scope of Services outlined in Section IV and V, and our experience providing on-call services to the City of Laguna Hills since 2023, GMU understands that the City is seeking responsive, technically qualified consultants to support Public Works and Engineering operations through an as-needed task order-based service model.

The requested services generally involve coordination with City staff, timely project delivery, support for capital improvement and maintenance projects, plan review assistance, constructionphase support, and ongoing pavement infrastructure management.

GMU is not proposing to provide Building Division services identified in Section IV of the RFP.

Our proposal is limited to the Public Works/Engineering-related services identified in Section V, specifically:
> Section V. Category A. - Public Works Inspection
> Section V. Category E. - Engineering Plan Check (Geotechnical Plan Checking and Report Review)
> Section V. Category G. - Pavement Management Plan Development Services > Other Related Services:
▪ Pavement Engineering
▪ Geotechnical Engineering
▪ Construction Materials Inspection and Testing, including Geotechnical Observation and Testing, Materials Testing, Pavement Observation and Testing, and Registered Special Inspection
GMU understands the importance of providing responsive communication, experienced personnel, practical technical recommendations, and consistent coordination with City staff to support the City’s ongoing public infrastructure and development-related activities. A more detailed discussion of these services and GMU’s proposed approach to each service category is provided below.

APPROACH
GMU’s approach to on-call municipal support services emphasizes responsiveness, continuity of assigned personnel, practical technical support, and clear communication with City staff. We understand that public works and engineering assignments often require rapid response, flexibility in staffing, and coordination with City personnel, contractors, utility agencies, and design consultants to maintain project schedules and support ongoing City operations.

Upon receipt of a task order or request for services, GMU will acknowledge the request the same business day and, when appropriate, prepare a project-specific scope, schedule, and fee proposal for the City’s review. For urgent or emergency assignments, GMU is available to respond during evenings and weekends with minimal notice. All proposed key staff are based locally within Orange County, allowing rapid mobilization and direct coordination with City personnel.

Page 758 of 989 ends

Ms. Jennifer Lowe, CITY OF LAGUNA HILLS
Proposal, On-Call Public Works/Engineering Consulting and Support Services May 22, 2026 13 GMU Proposal 26.202.00
Following authorization, the assigned GMU Project Manager will develop a project-specific work approach tailored to the City’s objectives, schedule, and budget. Depending on the assignment, services may include field investigations, engineering analysis, plan review, laboratory testing, construction support, and preparation of technical deliverables. Throughout each assignment, GMU management staff monitor technical quality, schedule, budget, and communication to support timely and consistent delivery of services.

GMU staffs each task order with personnel appropriate for the assignment scope and complexity.

Typical task order staffing may include a Project Manager, supporting engineering staff, certified inspectors, and laboratory personnel, as needed. Because all services are coordinated through GMU’s Rancho Santa Margarita office, the City benefits from streamlined communication, efficient internal coordination, and rapid deployment of staff and resources.

Project schedules are established in coordination with City staff at the outset of each assignment.

Following authorization, GMU can typically initiate services within a few business days, depending on project complexity, permit requirements, and site access conditions. Deliverable schedules are tracked throughout the assignment to support timely completion of services and responsiveness to City needs.

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Public Works Inspection
GMU provides Public Works inspection services for encroachment permits, public infrastructure improvements, street rehabilitation projects, utility improvements, grading activities, and related municipal construction projects. Services may include review of approved plans and permits, field observation of construction activities, documentation of contractor compliance with project requirements, coordination with City staff and contractors, and communication of field issues requiring resolution. Inspection personnel are supported by GMU project managers and engineering staff to facilitate timely communication and issue resolution throughout construction.

Engineering Plan Check (Including Geotechnical Review Services) GMU provides engineering plan check and geotechnical review services for public and private development projects. Review services may include grading plans, geotechnical reports, storm water quality plans (including hydrology studies and Water Quality Management Plans (WQMPs)), pavement sections, and related engineering documents. Reviews are performed in accordance with applicable City standards, project requirements, and accepted engineering practices, with an emphasis on practical, concise, and timely review comments.

GMU utilizes an internal review tracking system to document receipt, completion, and transmittal of review comments and responses, allowing efficient management of review turnaround times and coordination with City staff.

Page 759 of 989 ends

Ms. Jennifer Lowe, CITY OF LAGUNA HILLS
Proposal, On-Call Public Works/Engineering Consulting and Support Services May 22, 2026 14 GMU Proposal 26.202.00
Pavement Management Plan Services
GMU provides Pavement Management
Plan (PMP) services for municipal
roadway networks in accordance with
OCTA Measure M2 and ASTM D6433
requirements. GMU currently provides
PMP services for other OC cities that
also have measure M2 pavement
management plan report
requirements, such as cities of
Newport Beach, Laguna Niguel, Aliso
Viejo, and Cypress. Beyond Orange
County, GMU has also provided
pavement management plan services for
the Cities of Hermosa Beach, San
Fernando, and Chino Hills, as well as
other agencies and private communities
throughout Southern California.

Our services include pavement inventory review and updates, field pavement condition surveys, pavement condition index (PCI) evaluations, GIS/GPS-based data collection, maintenance and rehabilitation (M&R) planning, budget forecasting, and preparation of OCTA-compliant PMP reports and supporting documentation.

Pavement Inventory and Database
Review / Update: GMU will review and
update the City’s pavement inventory
database, including verification of
roadway segment limits, pavement
areas, functional classifications, and
related pavement management data.

Our team utilizes established QA/QC
procedures developed through recent
PMP projects for multiple Orange
County agencies to efficiently validate
and maintain pavement management
system (PMS) databases while
minimizing the level of effort required
from City staff. Figure 2: GMU staff performing pavement condition index (PCI) field surveys in accordance with ASTM D6433.

Figure 1: City of Newport Beach pavement condition rating map. GMU has prepared the City’s Pavement Management
Plans since 2021.

Page 760 of 989 ends

Ms. Jennifer Lowe, CITY OF LAGUNA HILLS
Proposal, On-Call Public Works/Engineering Consulting and Support Services May 22, 2026 15 GMU Proposal 26.202.00
Field Pavement Condition
Surveys: Field pavement condition
surveys are performed by GMU’s
OCTA-certified pavement
inspectors in accordance with
ASTM D6433 and applicable OCTA
guidelines. During surveys,
pavement distress data, roadway
characteristics, pavement type, and
other segment information are
verified and updated as needed.

GMU incorporates multiple layers of
quality control during field
evaluations, including calibration
reviews between inspectors,
selective re-inspections, and
comparison of newly collected PCI
data against historical trends to help
ensure consistent and reliable
pavement condition results.

PCI Analysis and Reporting: GMU
processes field survey data using industry-standard pavement management software, including MicroPAVER, to calculate PCI values and support network-level pavement analysis. Deliverables may include updated GIS-based pavement condition maps, PCI summary tables, roadway condition exhibits, and budget scenario evaluations to support City Council presentations, capital improvement planning, and OCTA reporting requirements.

Practical and Effective Network-Level Recommendations: GMU develops maintenance and rehabilitation (M&R) recommendations using a practical, data-driven approach that considers pavement condition, deterioration trends, roadway classification, available funding, and lifecycle cost considerations. Services may include preparation of short- and long-term M&R plans identifying recommended treatments, project timing, estimated construction costs, and funding scenarios to support capital improvement programming and long-term pavement preservation planning.

Figure 3: GMU OCTA-certified Pavement Inspectors.

Page 761 of 989 ends

Ms. Jennifer Lowe, CITY OF LAGUNA HILLS
Proposal, On-Call Public Works/Engineering Consulting and Support Services May 22, 2026 16 GMU Proposal 26.202.00
Pavement Engineering
GMU maintains a dedicated in-house
Pavement Engineering Department
specializing in pavement evaluation,
rehabilitation design, pavement materials
engineering, and construction support
services for municipal roadway systems.

This integrated capability allows GMU to
support both long-term pavement planning
efforts and individual rehabilitation projects
as City needs arise.

Services may include subsurface evaluation
(corings), falling weight deflectometer
(FWD) testing, ground-penetrating radar
(GPR) testing, laboratory testing,
engineering analysis, and preparation of
rehabilitation recommendations. These tools
and services can provide additional
structural and materials-related data to
supplement PCI-based pavement
management evaluations and support
optimization of future rehabilitation
strategies and capital improvement projects.

Figure 4: Illustration demonstrating the effect M&R strategies have on longterm pavement performance.

Figure 5: GMU's in-house falling weight deflectometer
(FWD) and ground-penetrating radar (GPR) testing
equipment located at our Rancho Santa Margarita
office, used for structural pavement evaluation and
layer thickness assessment.

Page 762 of 989 ends

Ms. Jennifer Lowe, CITY OF LAGUNA HILLS
Proposal, On-Call Public Works/Engineering Consulting and Support Services May 22, 2026 17 GMU Proposal 26.202.00
GMU also provides pavement materials laboratory testing through its in-house Caltrans-certified laboratory, including asphalt concrete mix design services and quality assurance/quality control testing during construction. This integrated approach allows GMU to support pavement projects from initial pavement management planning and project prioritization through final design, construction support, and quality assurance.

Figure 6: Asphalt pavement deflection
testing data map prepared by GMU for
the City of Aliso Viejo (2025).

Page 763 of 989 ends

Ms. Jennifer Lowe, CITY OF LAGUNA HILLS
Proposal, On-Call Public Works/Engineering Consulting and Support Services May 22, 2026 18 GMU Proposal 26.202.00
Geotechnical Engineering
GMU has nearly 60 years of experience providing geotechnical investigation and design services for both public and private sector clients. Our team has supported a wide range of municipal and infrastructure projects, including civic centers, city halls, community buildings, parks, bridges, roadways, retaining walls (including segmental systems), utilities, slope grading and repair, and emergency response services such as landslide evaluation, repair design, and construction oversight. This depth of experience and technical capability enables GMU to deliver responsive and cost-effective geotechnical solutions.
• Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology - Four Registered Geotechnical Engineers and five Certified Engineering Geologists with extensive experience spanning master-planned communities, landslides, bridges, public works facilities, roadways, and high-rise structures.
• Structural Engineering and Geo-Structural Design - Design of conventional retaining walls, soil nail walls, soldier pile systems, and mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) walls. • Soils and Materials Laboratory - Certified by Caltrans and AASHTO. • Forensic Engineering and Expert Witness Consultation – Over 35 years of experience providing forensic investigations, litigation support, and expert witness services. • Geotechnical Instrumentation - More than 35 years of experience in the installation and monitoring of hillside and slope movement instrumentation systems.

Figure 7: GMU performing geotechnical subsurface exploration in support the ACI Jet redevelopment at John Wayne Airport.

Page 764 of 989 ends

Ms. Jennifer Lowe, CITY OF LAGUNA HILLS
Proposal, On-Call Public Works/Engineering Consulting and Support Services May 22, 2026 19 GMU Proposal 26.202.00
Construction Materials Testing and Special Inspection
GMU provides construction materials inspection and testing services for soil, aggregate base, asphalt concrete, concrete, reinforcing steel, masonry, structural steel, and related construction materials. Services may include field sampling and testing, compaction testing, batch plant inspection, laboratory testing, and documentation of contractor compliance with project specifications and applicable standards.

GMU utilizes certified engineering technicians and inspectors with certifications from Caltrans, ACI, ICC, and other recognized organizations. Field and laboratory services are supported by GMU’s in-house Caltrans- and AASHTO-certified materials testing laboratory, allowing compliance with requirements for state- and federally funded projects.

Many GMU field personnel are cross-certified in geotechnical observation, pavement inspection, and special inspection services, allowing efficient staffing and reduced field coordination requirements for the City. Laboratory test results are reviewed by GMU engineers and provided to the City with engineering evaluation and support, as needed.

GMU can also perform construction materials submittal reviews and review contractor-provided certificates of compliance for conformance with project specifications and contract documents.

Figure 8: GMU’s Caltrans- and AASHTO certified materials testing laboratory, located in Rancho Santa Margarita, CA.

Page 765 of 989 ends

Ms. Jennifer Lowe, CITY OF LAGUNA HILLS
Proposal, On-Call Public Works/Engineering Consulting and Support Services May 22, 2026 20 GMU Proposal 26.202.00
Construction materials that we routinely test and/or inspect include:

Construction Materials Testing Capabilities
• Soil
• Aggregates
• Concrete
• Masonry
• Asphalt mixtures and asphalt plant
inspection
• Epoxies
• Metal
• Steel reinforcement
• Welds
• Coring of asphalt
Our geotechnical observation and testing capabilities include:

Geotechnical Observation and Testing
• Grading observation
• Compaction testing
• Fill moisture control
• Subdrain installation
• Removal observations
• Roadway subgrade testing
• Trench backfill testing
• Mitigation of unsuitable subgrade soil
Our notable pavement observation and testing capabilities, conducted by Caltrans-certified technicians, include:

Pavement Observation and Testing
• Subgrade aggregate base material
compaction
• Hot-mix asphalt placement and
compaction
• In-place density of hot-mix asphalt,
base, and subgrade using a nuclear
gauge
• Pavement coring and testing
• Verification of Cement/emulsion
content
• Mixing temperatures, time, and
uniformity (segregation) checks
• Mix uniformity and adequate mixing
• Aggregate storage and handling
condition observations
• Pavement coring and testing
• Equipment working order verification
• Joint construction
• Equipment calibrations, including
scales
• Batch and/or drum plant inspection
and testing, including
o Sand equivalent (SE)
o Percentage of crushed particles
o Fine aggregate specific gravity
and absorption (FA SG)
o Coarse aggregate specific gravity
and absorption (CA SG)
o Los Angeles (LA) abrasion testing
o Fine aggregate angularity (FAA)

Page 766 of 989 ends

Ms. Jennifer Lowe, CITY OF LAGUNA HILLS
Proposal, On-Call Public Works/Engineering Consulting and Support Services May 22, 2026 21 GMU Proposal 26.202.00
Figure 9: GMU performing pavement observation and testing services in the City of Newport Beach to support evaluation and mitigation of unstable subgrade conditions.

Our special inspection capabilities, conducted by ICC-certified inspectors, include:

Special Inspection
• Concrete placement
• Reinforcing steel and embedded
items
• Structural steel erection welding
• High-strength bolting
• Post-tensioned concrete
• Masonry
• Drilled-in anchors
• Fireproofing
• Non-shrink grout
Many of GMU’s public works inspectors and engineering technicians are multi-certified as geotechnical engineering technicians, special inspectors, and pavement inspectors. This crosscertification allows GMU to assign a single qualified technician to perform multiple required inspections, where other firms may need two or three individuals to complete the same scope.

The result is greater efficiency, reduced scheduling effort for City staff, and measurable cost savings.

The following table lists GMU’s employees and their certifications relating to inspection and materials testing.

GMU Staff Name Certifications* Expiration Date(s)
Daniel Abeyta ACI
Caltrans
10/11/2029
10/11/2029
Jonathan Basalla ACI
ICC
Caltrans
1/14/2027
10/04/2026
Passed renewal, waiting on
actual certification with
expiration date
Rasheed Bilal Caltrans 2/20/2028
Kevin Buffington ACI
ICC
6/25/2026
9/1/2026

Page 767 of 989 ends

Ms. Jennifer Lowe, CITY OF LAGUNA HILLS
Proposal, On-Call Public Works/Engineering Consulting and Support Services May 22, 2026 22 GMU Proposal 26.202.00
Kevin Criswell Caltrans 7/31/2026
Mehrdad Ganji ACI
Caltrans
2/16/2029
2/16/2029
Royce Gould ACI
ICC
Caltrans
8/04/2028
6/21/2028
2/20/2027
Russell Price ACI
ICC
Caltrans
8/04/2028
4/18/2028
3/13/2027
Jade Sill ACI
ICC
Caltrans
5/05/2028
9/1/2026
3/13/2027
Aaron Yett ACI
Caltrans
1/14/2027
7/10/2026
Laboratory Caltrans 6/26/2026

PROJECT MANAGEMENT
GMU’s assigned Project Manager will provide overall coordination and management for each task order from initiation through completion, including scope coordination, scheduling, technical oversight, invoicing, and communication with City staff, contractors, and the project team.

Depending on the assignment type and complexity, GMU’s Principals and senior technical staff remain actively involved throughout the duration of projects to provide technical guidance, quality control, and responsive decision-making support.

GMU emphasizes proactive communication and responsive project management to help keep assignments on schedule and within budget. Regular coordination with City staff allows project issues, scheduling conflicts, technical concerns, and field-related observations to be identified and addressed promptly to maintain project continuity and minimize delays.

GMU will provide project status updates and coordination at a frequency appropriate to the complexity and duration of each assignment and tailored to the City’s preferences.

For construction-related assignments, GMU personnel promptly communicate observed construction, inspection, or material-related deficiencies to City staff and contractor representatives to support timely corrective action and minimize construction delays.

CITY-PROVIDED RESOURCES & ASSISTANCE
For the effective delivery of GMU’s services, we request the following from the City:
• Project Documents & Background Information – Access to plans, specifications, permits, prior reports, and pavement management plan data files. • Coordination Support – Assistance in communicating with City departments, utility agencies, and stakeholders.
• Inspection Access & Permits – Right-of-entry for inspections and any necessary permits.

Page 768 of 989 ends

Ms. Jennifer Lowe, CITY OF LAGUNA HILLS
Proposal, On-Call Public Works/Engineering Consulting and Support Services May 22, 2026 23 GMU Proposal 26.202.00
• Meeting Space & Scheduling – Support for progress meetings, pre-construction meetings, as needed.

We will work closely with the City to ensure efficient project execution while minimizing resource demands.

ADDITIONAL SERVICES
GMU offers the following optional services to City clients on an as-needed basis.

Geotechnical Emergency Consulting Services
GMU’s professional staff of nine licensed Geotechnical Engineers and Engineering Geologists allows us to respond to emergencies immediately and with both technical expertise and direct experience in the City of Laguna Hills. Our emergency response capabilities include:
• 24/7 response to geotechnical emergencies.
• On-site evaluation and consultation.
• Real-time recommendations addressing public safety concerns (i.e., home or structure tagging, slope stability assessments, etc.)
Figure 10: GMU conducting subsurface drilling for an emergency slope stability evaluation in San Clemente along the bluff above the Metrolink rail corridor.

Page 769 of 989 ends

Ms. Jennifer Lowe, CITY OF LAGUNA HILLS
Proposal, On-Call Public Works/Engineering Consulting and Support Services May 22, 2026 24 GMU Proposal 26.202.00
Geotechnical Forensic/Expert Witness Consulting Services GMU senior staff has consulted on hundreds of forensic and litigation-related cases involving public agencies and private clients. Mike Moscrop and Lisa Bates serve as the primary contacts for these services and have represented numerous cities in litigation and claim resolution matters.

Geotechnical Monitoring
GMU has provided comprehensive geotechnical instrumentation and monitoring services on projects throughout Southern California for over two decades. Our experiences include monitoring major landslides, MSE walls, foundations, deep fills, shoring systems/excavations, and embankments.

GMU designs, installs, and monitors geotechnical instrumentation systems and associated databases. GMU is known for the successful design and implementation of in-field sensors read manually to the monitoring of complex projects in real-time. Our designs have assisted our clients in making informed decisions, reducing costs, and minimizing risks. Types of instrumentation include the following:

Types of Instrumentation
• Deformation Strain
o Inclinometers
o Extensometers
o Settlement Monuments
o Settlement Plates
o Utility Point Markers
o Tiltmeters
o Strain Gauges
o Crack Gauges
• Groundwater
o Monitoring Wells
o Piezometers
• Pressure
o Pressure Cells including:
▪ Vibrating Wire
▪ Pneumatic
▪ Tactile
• Vibration & Sound
o Four-Channel Portable
Seismographs with Sound
Monitoring
• Video
o Pipe Video

PROJECT CONTROLS
GMU utilizes established project controls to manage project scope, budget, schedule, and quality throughout each assignment. Key project control measures include the following:
• A lead Project Manager and Principal oversees each assignment from initiation through completion and serves as the primary point of contact between GMU and the City. • Internal project kickoff meetings are conducted to review project scope, schedule, staffing, technical approach, and budget expectations prior to beginning work. • Regular internal coordination meetings are held to monitor project progress, staffing, schedules, and project costs.
• Subconsultant and outside service costs, if utilized, are reviewed against project budgets prior to authorization and invoice approval.

Page 770 of 989 ends

Ms. Jennifer Lowe, CITY OF LAGUNA HILLS
Proposal, On-Call Public Works/Engineering Consulting and Support Services May 22, 2026 25 GMU Proposal 26.202.00
• Draft and final deliverables are reviewed by senior engineering staff and/or Principals as part of GMU’s QA/QC procedures.
• Ongoing communication between project staff, management, and the City supports timely identification and resolution of project issues.
• GMU emphasizes development of realistic project scopes, schedules, and budgets to support efficient project delivery and high-quality technical services.

QUALITY CONTROL/QUALITY ASSURANCE (QA/QC)
GMU maintains an established QA/QC program to provide technical oversight and quality control throughout each assignment. Project work is routinely reviewed by senior engineering staff and Principals to support technical accuracy, consistency, and compliance with applicable project requirements and industry standards. Regular internal coordination and project status discussions also allow GMU to efficiently address technical issues and develop practical, cost-effective solutions.

Field personnel report daily to project management regarding task progress, scheduling, and any issues encountered during field operations. GMU’s technicians and inspectors maintain certifications from Caltrans, ICC, ACI, and other agencies, while laboratory personnel, procedures, and equipment are certified by Caltrans, AASHTO, AMRL, DSA, and the County of Orange. GMU’s services are performed in accordance with applicable industry standards and current standards of practice.

Page 771 of 989 ends

Ms. Jennifer Lowe, CITY OF LAGUNA HILLS
Proposal, On-Call Public Works/Engineering Consulting and Support Services May 22, 2026 26 GMU Proposal 26.202.00
G. SCHEDULE
Based on our experience as on-call consultants for the City of Laguna Hills as well as other agencies, project schedules are based on the specific scope and site conditions for each project.

As requested in the RFP, we have provided example schedules for different project types. This schedule demonstrates typical durations for critical path items, work activities, deliverables, and review times. It should be noted that GMU has developed a reputation for responsiveness and on-time project completion, and we commit to being ready to begin work on a project immediately upon receiving our notice to proceed.
• Public Works Inspection:
o Monday through Friday, 7:00 am to 11:00 am or as needed • Engineering Plan Check:
o Grading plan check and storm water quality plan review:
▪ Initial review – 10 working days
▪ Subsequent reviews – 5 working days
o Geotechnical review:
▪ Initial review – 10 working days
▪ Subsequent reviews – 5 working days
o Deliverables: Review comments in template form or letter; redlined documents as needed.
• Pavement Management Plan Development Services:
o Project Kick off – 1 to 2 weeks
o Update Maintenance and Rehabilitation Activities – 2 to 3 weeks o Pavement Condition Index Surveys – 8 to 10 weeks
o Pavement Condition Index Analysis – 2 to 3 weeks
o Quality Control Procedures – 2 to 3 weeks
o Budget Analysis and M&R Planning – 2 to 3 weeks
o OCTA Measure M2 Report – 2 to 3 weeks
o Many of these tasks overlap and occur concurrently. Typical PMP project duration from initiation through final report preparation is approximately 4 to 6 months, depending on City review timelines and project coordination requirements. o GMU understands the City of Laguna Hills’ Measure M2 PMP update is submitted during even-numbered years. If selected, GMU recommends initiating the PMP update in Fall of the preceding year to allow adequate time for field evaluations, data analysis, and preparation of a draft PMP report for City review by approximately March, followed by finalization prior to the June OCTA submission deadline.
• Pavement Engineering:
o Document review, pavement surface condition assessment – 1 to 2 weeks o Field exploration – 1 week
o Laboratory testing – 1 to 2 weeks
o Deflection testing and analyses – 1 to 2 weeks

Page 772 of 989 ends

Ms. Jennifer Lowe, CITY OF LAGUNA HILLS
Proposal, On-Call Public Works/Engineering Consulting and Support Services May 22, 2026 27 GMU Proposal 26.202.00
o Ground penetrating radar testing – 1 to 2 weeks (concurrent with deflection testing) o Pavement engineering analyses – 2 to 3 weeks
o Identification of isolated pavement repair locations – 2 to 3 weeks o Pavement report preparation – 2 to 3 weeks
• Geotechnical Engineering:
o Background document review – 1 to 2 weeks
o Field exploration – 1 to 2 weeks
o Laboratory testing – 2 to 3 weeks
o Geotechnical analyses – 2 to 3 weeks
o Report preparation – 2 to 3 weeks
• Construction Observation and Materials Testing:
o Technicians and Inspectors available within 24 hours’ notice. o Deliverables (inspection reports) available within 2 working days or sooner if needed.

Page 773 of 989 ends

Ms. Jennifer Lowe, CITY OF LAGUNA HILLS
Proposal, On-Call Public Works/Engineering Consulting and Support Services May 22, 2026 28 GMU Proposal 26.202.00
H: COMMUNICATION PLAN
GMU recognizes that responsive communication and coordination are critical components of successful on-call municipal support services. Our team is committed to maintaining clear, timely, and proactive communication with City staff throughout each assignment. Communication will typically occur through a combination of email correspondence, phone calls, virtual meetings, and in-person coordination meetings, depending on the City’s preferences and the nature of the assignment.

Unless otherwise requested by the City, GMU typically provides weekly communication updates regarding project status, schedule, outstanding issues, upcoming activities, and deliverables.

However, the frequency of communication can be adjusted based on the City’s preferences and project needs, including more frequent coordination during active construction, schedule-sensitive tasks, or urgent matters, or less frequent updates for routine or lower-intensity assignments.

Given GMU’s local office location in Rancho Santa Margarita and our existing working relationship with the City, GMU personnel are readily available for in-person meetings, site visits, and coordination discussions at City Hall or project sites, as needed.

GMU’s communication approach includes the following:
• Regular coordination between GMU project managers, field personnel, and City staff regarding project status, schedule, and outstanding issues. • Timely responses to City questions, requests for information, and project-related concerns.
• Internal coordination between field and office staff to communicate field conditions, testing results, schedule impacts, and potential project issues. • Prompt communication of critical findings, construction issues, or items requiring City input or direction.
• Periodic progress updates and meetings, as requested by the City, to review project status, budgets, schedules, and deliverables.

Additional coordination and communication will be provided as needed to support project milestones, schedule-sensitive activities, or urgent project matters.

Page 774 of 989 ends

Ms. Jennifer Lowe, CITY OF LAGUNA HILLS
Proposal, On-Call Public Works/Engineering Consulting and Support Services May 22, 2026 29 GMU Proposal 26.202.00
I. COMPENSATION/PAYMENT SCHEDULE
In accordance with Section VI of the RFP and Addendum 1, GMU has submitted its schedule of fixed hourly billing rates under separate cover. As clarified in Addendum 1, GMU’s proposal is limited to Option 1 (Public Works/Engineering Services), and no Building Division services are proposed.

GMU has also completed and included the required Fee Proposal Worksheet. Because portions of the worksheet are not applicable to the Public Works/Engineering service categories proposed herein, GMU has additionally included its Schedule of Charges for Public Works/Engineering Services to provide a more complete representation of the billing classifications and rates applicable to the proposed services.

The submitted Schedule of Charges shall remain valid for the duration of the contract period.

J: CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE
GMU understands and agrees to provide evidence of insurance coverage meeting the requirements outlined in the Sample Professional Services Agreement upon request by the City.

GMU currently maintains an active on-call agreement with the City and has previously provided certificates of insurance in support of those services. The consultant’s acknowledgement of compliance with insurance requirements for agreement for professional services form is attached to this proposal in Appendix B.

K: CERTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL
The certification of proposal form is attached to this proposal in Appendix B.

L: NON-COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT
The non-collusion affidavit form is attached to this proposal in Appendix B.

M: ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF ADDENDA
The acknowledgement of addenda form is attached to this proposal in Appendix B.

Page 775 of 989 ends

Appendix A
Key Staff Resumes

Page 776 of 989 ends

30336 Esperanza, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688 | ph: 949.888.6513 | fax: 949.888.1380 | web: www.gmugeo.com ROGER W. SCHLIERKAMP, MSC, PE
Vice President, Principal Pavement Engineer

PROFESSION
Civil Engineer

REGISTRATION
Registered Civil Engineer C81529
State of California

EDUCATION
M.S. Civil Engineering
(Pavement/Materials Engineering),
University of Nevada, Reno
B.S. Civil Engineering
University of Nevada, Reno

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
GMU Geotechnical, Inc.
(2014 – Present)
Vice President, Principal
Pavement Engineer, Rancho
Santa Margarita, California
Twining, Inc.

Pavement Engineer
Long Beach, California
University of Nevada, Reno
Graduate Researcher,
Pavement / Materials
Reno, Nevada

PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
• California Asphalt
Pavement Association
(CalAPA)
• ASCE Orange County
• Engineers without Borders
• AGC
• American Public Works
Association (APWA)
• Santiago Canyon College
– Part Time Instruction
(Construction Materials)
Roger Schlierkamp leads GMU’s comprehensive range
of pavement engineering services, including pavement
evaluations/designs, PS&E development, construction
management, observation and testing, mix design
development, and pavement management planning. His
full-circle knowledge allows him to develop innovative, practical, and cost-effective solutions for pavement
challenges.

He shares his experience and knowledge in both
workshop and classroom settings, having previously
taught "Construction Materials and Testing" at Santiago Canyon College. His active role in the Greenbook
Committee also underscores his influence in shaping
pavement construction specifications embraced by
numerous agencies and projects across Southern
California.

Roger possesses over 16 years of experience in
pavement engineering and is a California-licensed civil engineer. A summary of his areas of expertise includes:
• Pavement engineering evaluation, structural
analysis, rehabilitation design
• Pavement management planning (PMP)
• Pavement construction management advisory
• Pavement plans, specifications, and estimates
• Non-destructive testing, including falling-weight
deflectometer (FWD) testing & ground-penetrating
radar (GPR) testing
• Pavement smoothness testing
• Pavement mix designs, including hot-mix asphalt
(HMA), rubberized hot-mix asphalt (RHMA), warmmix asphalt (WMA) following Marshall, Hveem, and Superpave design methods, soil-stabilization, and
cold recycled asphalt
• Pavement preservation strategies, including fog
seals, slurry seals, scrub seals, micro-surfacing
seals, and chip seals
• Pavement rehabilitation strategies, such as
rubberized pavement overlays, cold recycling, fulldepth reclamation, cement/lime base, and subgrade stabilization
• In-depth knowledge of various pavement
construction specifications, including Caltrans,
Greenbook, Airport, and Ports.
• Quality control / assurance laboratory testing
expertise, including Hveem Stability, Hamburg
Wheel Track, Moisture Susceptibility, and more.

Page 777 of 989 ends

Roger W. Schlierkamp 2
Select Pavement Management Plan (PMP) Projects
City of Aliso Viejo, Citywide Pavement Management Plan Update, 2026-2028: Completed the 2026 citywide pavement management study covering approximately 72 centerline miles to support compliance with OCTA Measure M2 requirements; the 2028 update is currently under contract. Scope included updating and QA/QC-validated the pavement inventory database, performed ASTM D6433-compliant PCI walking surveys, and integrated results into a GIS-based management system. Conducted multi-scenario budget analyses, including existing funding, maintain-PCI, and PCI increase scenarios, incorporating deterioration modeling and treatment triggers. Developed conclusions and prioritized maintenance and rehabilitation recommendations based on these analyses.

City of Newport Beach, Citywide Pavement Management Plan Updates, 2023-2026:

Completed PMP updates for approximately 205 centerline miles in support of OCTA Measure M2 compliance. Scope included updating and QA/QC validation of the pavement inventory database, conducting ASTM D6433-compliant PCI surveys, and integrating results into a GISbased management system. The updates included extensive PCC alley surveys, with local streets and alleys assessed on a biennial cycle, as well as annual City-specific GIS database updates. Analyses were performed using MicroPAVER and included multi-scenario budget evaluations (existing funding, maintain-PCI, and PCI increase scenarios) to develop and prioritize cost-effective maintenance and rehabilitation strategies based on network condition.

City of Laguna Niguel, CA, Citywide Pavement Management Plan Updates, 2020-2026:

Pavement condition index (PCI) assessment of all city-maintained streets consisting of a total of approximately 141.5 centerline miles of streets and budget scenario analysis to help optimize the City’s pavement maintenance and rehabilitation schedule and budget (approximately $2M per year typically). PAVER pavement management software was utilized to deliver this project.

City of Hermosa Beach, Citywide Pavement Management Plan Update, 2024: Managed a citywide pavement management study covering approximately 48 centerline miles to meet Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LA Metro) requirements. Utilized PAVER to develop condition assessments and maintenance strategies.

City of San Fernando - Citywide Pavement Management Plan Update, 2024: Led the update of the City’s Pavement Management Plan (PMP) for approximately 50 centerline miles in compliance with LA Metro requirements. Scope included updating the PMP in accordance with ASTM D6433, validating pavement condition data, and utilizing PAVER to develop a prioritized multi-year (7-year) rehabilitation program based on PCI and site-specific constraints. Field-verified recommended treatments and performed targeted investigations to confirm the most appropriate maintenance and rehabilitation strategies. Developed annual street rehabilitation lists, supported GIS-based data integration and mapping, and assisted with council presentations. Also supported compliance reporting and implementation planning for the City’s annual pavement rehabilitation program.

City of Chino Hills - Citywide Pavement Management Plan Updates, 2021: Performed a comprehensive pavement condition index (PCI) survey and system update for approximately 193 centerline miles, re-establishing the City’s pavement management program after its last update in 2005. Deliverables developed using PAVER.

Page 778 of 989 ends

Roger W. Schlierkamp 3
Crystal Cove Community Association, 2016 - 2020: Established a pavement management inventory in 2016 and performing yearly pavement management plan updates since to help the community cost-effectively maintain and optimize their roadway network condition.

Groves at Orchard Hills Homeowners Association, 2019 to Present: Established a pavement management inventory in 2019 and performed pavement management plan updates.

Casta Del Sol Community Association, 2017 to Present: Established a pavement management system in 2017 for approximately 22 centerline miles of streets managed by the HOA with a yearly street improvement budget of approximately $800k to $1.2M per year.

Performing periodic reviews and updates to the community’s pavement management plan each year.

Lake Forest II Master HOA, 2020 to Present: Established a pavement management system in 2020 for approximately 12 centerline miles of streets managed by the HOA with a yearly street improvement budget of approximately $1.0M per year. Performing periodic reviews and updates of the community’s pavement management plan each year.

Emerald Bay Community Association, 2019 to Present: Established a pavement management system in 2019 for approximately 6 centerline miles of streets managed by the HOA with a yearly street improvement budget of approximately $300k per year. Performing periodic reviews and updates of the community’s pavement management plan each year.

Ocean Ranch HOA, 2014 to Present: Established a pavement management system in 2014 for approximately 5 centerline miles of streets managed by the HOA with a yearly street improvement budget of approximately $600k per year. Performing periodic reviews and updates of the community’s pavement management plan each year.

Select Quality Assurance Testing and Observation Projects (Construction Materials Testing)
Irvine Center Drive Pavement Rehabilitation Project (CIP 312101), City of Irvine, CA, 2025: Quality assurance observation and testing services for the rehabilitation of Irvine Center Drive from Pacifica to Lake Forest Drive. Improvements consisted of 7-inch localized AC patch repairs and 3.5-inch mill-and-overlay including a 2-inch ARHM cap. Testing included subgrade compaction, asphalt concrete, ARHM, and concrete materials testing.

Jamboree Road Pavement Rehabilitation Project (CIP 311802), City of Irvine, CA, 2024:

Provided geotechnical and materials observation and testing services for the rehabilitation of Jamboree Road from Michelle Drive to the railroad tracks. The heavily traveled corridor had experienced recurring pavement settlement and cracking caused by under-compacted fill over a 67-foot-wide reinforced concrete box culvert located approximately 10 to 12 feet below the surface. The project team implemented an innovative solution using cement-treated subgrade and geogrid reinforcement embedded within aggregate base to bridge over the deficient fill, eliminating the need for deep excavation while reducing construction time, traffic disruption, and cost. GMU's testing services included cement-treated subgrade, aggregate base, and asphalt concrete materials. This project was recognized by ASCE Orange County and ASCE Los Angeles with an Outstanding Roadways and Highways Project award.

Page 779 of 989 ends

Roger W. Schlierkamp 4
Non-Arterial Streets Asphalt Repairs Zone D (24S01A), City of Lake Forest, CA, 2025:

Quality assurance observation and testing services for the rehabilitation of Zone D non-arterial streets. Improvements consisted of 2-inch AC mill-and-overlay, 4-inch AC mill-and-overlay, and 12-inch full-depth AC replacement. Testing included asphalt concrete field density, subgrade compaction, and laboratory testing of AC materials.

Arterial Pavement Rehabilitation Project – Paseo De Valencia and La Paz Road (CIP 104 & 109), City of Laguna Hills, CA, 2024-2025: Quality assurance observation and testing services for the rehabilitation of Paseo De Valencia from Alicia Parkway to Avenida De La Carlota and La Paz Road from the west city limit/SR-73 to Alameda Avenue. Improvements consisted of AC remove-and-replace (4- to 6-inch depth), 2-inch fiber-reinforced AC/ARHM overlay, and PCC curb, gutter, and sidewalk improvements. The project also included curb ramp replacement along Alicia Parkway.

Wagon Wheel Pavement Maintenance Project, Orange County Public Works, CA, 2024- 2025: Provided quality assurance observation and testing services and design-phase pavement engineering services for the asphalt overlay of various residential streets within the unincorporated Wagon Wheel Service Area north of Oso Parkway. Improvements consisted of cold milling, ARHM-GG-B asphalt concrete overlay, utility adjustments, survey monument adjustments, and reestablishment of traffic striping and pavement markings. GMU also assisted the County with compaction dispute testing protocol and resolution.

Glenwood Road Pavement Rehabilitation Project, City of Aliso Viejo, CA, 2025: Quality assurance observation and testing services for the mill-and-overlay rehabilitation of Glenwood Road. Improvements consisted of milling and fiber-reinforced rubberized asphalt concrete overlay. Testing included asphalt concrete field density, laboratory testing of AC materials, and plant inspection during AC production. GMU also assisted the City with resolution of an asphalt quantity discrepancy.

Harbor Blvd and Garden Grove Blvd Intersection Improvement Project (CP-1303000), City of Garden Grove, CA, 2025-2026: Oversaw quality assurance observation and testing services for this intersection improvement project. Improvements consisted of roadway widening, construction of new turn lanes, asphalt concrete and aggregate base paving, concrete curb and gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, catch basins, storm drain piping, and traffic signal installation. GMU provided materials testing of asphalt concrete, aggregate base, subgrade compaction, and concrete materials to support the project. 2025 Residential Streets Improvement Project (CP-1446000), City of Garden Grove, CA, 2025: Oversaw quality assurance observation and testing services for the rehabilitation of various residential streets. Improvements consisted of cold milling, localized AC dig-out repairs, asphalt concrete paving, Type II slurry seal with reinforcing fibers, PCC curb and gutter replacement, cross gutter and curb ramp reconstruction, and adjustment of utility covers to finish grade.

Seal Beach Boulevard and North Gate Road/I-405 Ramps Intersection Improvement Project, City of Seal Beach, CA, 2025: Quality assurance observation and testing services for the mill-and-overlay and full-depth AC replacement at the intersection of Seal Beach Boulevard and North Gate Road/I-405 southbound on- and off-ramps. Milling depths ranged from 0.25 feet to 12 inches with full-depth AC replacement. Testing included subgrade and aggregate base compaction, asphalt concrete field density, and laboratory testing including

Page 780 of 989 ends

Roger W. Schlierkamp 5
Hveem Stability, maximum density, asphalt binder content, and gradation. Plant inspection services were also provided during AC production.

Residential Roadway Rehabilitation Project – Quadrant C3 (Project No. 25001), City of Fountain Valley, CA, 2025: Quality assurance observation and testing services for the rehabilitation of Quadrant C3 residential streets. Improvements consisted of cold milling, AC overlay, Type II polymer-modified slurry seal with 2.5% latex, and PCC sidewalk reconstruction.

Arterial Streets Pavement Rehabilitation Project Phases 1A and 2A (CIP 24108), City of San Juan Capistrano, CA, 2025: Quality assurance observation and testing services for the rehabilitation of San Juan Creek Road and Camino Del Avion. Testing included subgrade compaction, aggregate base, Portland cement concrete, and asphalt concrete materials.

Residential Annual Slurry Program Zones V & VI – Phase 2 (Cash Contract No. 24-07), City of Laguna Niguel, CA, 2025: Quality assurance observation and testing services for approximately 4.2 million square feet of Type II rubberized emulsion aggregate slurry (REAS) seal. Laboratory testing included emulsion content, residual binder content and wet-track abrasion testing. GMU also prepared punch list inspection report of completed work.

City of Mission Viejo Fiber Utility Pavement Restoration Projects, City of Mission Viejo, CA, 2024 to Present: Oversaw quality assurance observation and testing services for the City's annual fiber utility pavement restoration projects. Improvements consisted of verifying milling depth, installation of pavement interlayer, and asphalt concrete overlay to restore pavement surfaces at micro-trench locations associated with fiber internet installation.

Edinger Avenue and Talbert Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation Project (CC No. 1741), City of Huntington Beach, CA, 2024: Quality assurance observation and testing services for the rehabilitation of Edinger Avenue from Countess Drive to Saybrook Lane, Talbert Avenue from Edwards Street to the west city limits, and Indianapolis Alley from Farnsworth Lane to Sandpiper Lane. Testing included cement-treated base, ARHM, conventional asphalt concrete, and concrete materials. Plant inspection services were provided for ARHM production.

Annual Roadway Resurfacing Project (CIP #1352) and Citywide Storm Drain Improvement Project (CIP #1358), City of Dana Point, CA, 2025 to Present: Quality assurance observation and testing services for the rehabilitation of various streets, including Blue Lantern, Valencia Place, Granada Drive, Calle Almanza, Calle Real, and Calle Portola.

Improvements consisted of full-depth reclamation, asphalt base paving, cold milling, fiberreinforced asphalt concrete overlay, subgrade repairs, PCC curb and gutter reconstruction, sidewalk, pedestrian ramps, cross gutters, catch basin and storm drain improvements, and adjustment of utility appurtenances to grade.

Annual Residential Roadway Repair, Overlay, and Slurry Seal Projects, City of Mission Viejo, CA, 2017 to Present: Oversight and management of quality assurance observation and testing services for the City's annual residential roadway repair, overlay, and slurry seal projects. Improvements generally consisted of localized AC patch repairs and ARHM overlay of arterial and residential streets, and annual slurry seal applications.

Antonio Gateway Improvements Project, 2025, City of Rancho Santa Margarita, CA, 2025: New median construction and asphalt concrete paving.

Page 781 of 989 ends

Roger W. Schlierkamp 6
Annual Citywide Street Resurfacing – FY 21-22 & FY 22-23 Projects, City of Stanton, CA, May 2022 to July 2024: Asphalt Rubberized Hot Mix (ARHM), Fiber Reinforced Asphalt Concrete (FRAC), and Slurry Seal observation and testing.

Cerritos Avenue (Knott Avenue to Beach Boulevard) Pavement Resurfacing Project, City of Stanton, CA, December 2023 to March 2024: Asphalt Rubberized Hot Mix (ARHM) and Asphalt Concrete (AC) observation and testing.
2017-2024 Annual Residential Roadway Repair and Overlay Projects: Oversight and management of materials testing services for the City’s annual residential roadway repair and overlay projects. Improvements consisted of 4-inch thick localized AC (patch) repairs followed by 1.5- or 2.0-inch thick AC overlay.
2017-2024 Annual Residential Slurry Seal Projects: Oversight and management of materials testing services for the City’s annual residential slurry seal projects. Improvements consisted of applying Type I rubberized slurry seal, rotating between 7 zones of residential streets each year.

Trampas Dam, Santa Margarita Water District, Rancho Mission Viejo, CA: Roger managed and oversaw the asphalt concrete (AC) materials testing component of the Trampas Dam Project, including pavement laboratory acceptance tests, such as asphalt concrete binder content, gradation, and Hveem Stability value.
2022 Zone F Slurry Seal Project, City of Lake Forest, CA: Managed quality assurance observation and testing services for the 2022 City of Lake Forest Zone F Slurry Seal Project.

Slurry seal laboratory tests included moisture content, emulsion content, residual binder content, gradation, sand equivalent, and wet-track abrasion test.

Select Pavement Evaluation and Design Projects
Local Municipalities and Agencies
Anaheim Shores / W Romneya Drive Pavement Evaluation Project (W La Palma Avenue to Euclid Street), City of Anaheim, CA, 2025-2026: Pavement design engineer overseeing the evaluation of approximately 3,650 centerline feet of Anaheim Shores and W Romneya Drive, including pavement surface condition assessment, falling weight deflectometer (FWD) testing, ground-penetrating radar (GPR) testing, corings, laboratory testing, mapping of localized AC repair areas, and development of pavement improvement recommendations.

GPR testing identified variable aggregate base conditions and confirmed areas lacking aggregate base, minimizing unforeseen conditions during construction. Deflection testing determined both segments to be structurally deficient. Five improvement alternatives were developed ranging from full-depth AC remove-and-replace reconstruction (20-year design life) to various mill-and-overlay strategies using fiber-reinforced ARHM and AC leveling courses with localized repairs (10- to 15-year design lives).

Nohl Ranch Open Space Trail Improvement Project, City of Anaheim, CA, 2025-2026:

Pavement evaluation and geotechnical design services for the Nohl Ranch Trail between Scout Trail and Santa Ana Canyon Road. Scope included pavement surface condition assessment, corings, laboratory testing, pavement engineering analysis, and development of

Page 782 of 989 ends

Roger W. Schlierkamp 7
pavement improvement recommendations, as well as retaining wall geotechnical design parameters. Two pavement improvement alternatives were developed: (1) full-depth AC reconstruction to achieve a 20-year design life, and (2) a 2-inch AC overlay to achieve a 10- year design life where grade increase is acceptable. Geotechnical recommendations included corrective grading, foundation design, lateral earth pressure parameters, and wall backfill and drainage criteria.

North and South Harbor Boulevard Pavement Evaluation Project, City of Anaheim, CA, 2025-2026: Pavement design engineer overseeing the evaluation of North Harbor Boulevard from the north city limits to West North Street and South Harbor Boulevard from Lincoln Avenue to West South Street, including pavement surface condition assessments, falling weight deflectometer (FWD) testing, ground-penetrating radar (GPR) testing, corings, laboratory testing, mapping of localized AC repair areas, and development of pavement improvement recommendations. These heavily traveled arterial segments carry Traffic Index values of 12.0 and 11.0, respectively. Deflection testing determined both segments to be structurally deficient. Two mill-and-overlay rehabilitation alternatives were developed using ARHM-GG-C overlay with localized AC repairs, providing 15- to 20-year design lives.

San Miguel Drive Pavement Evaluation Project (San Joaquin Hills Road to Ford Road), City of Newport Beach, CA, 2025: Pavement design engineer overseeing the evaluation of approximately 7,750 centerline feet of San Miguel Drive, including review of as-built drawings dating to the 1980s, pavement surface condition assessment, falling weight deflectometer (FWD) testing, corings, laboratory testing, identification of localized AC repair areas, and development of pavement improvement recommendations. Review of 2001 as-built records revealed that AC thickness was reduced during previous improvements, contributing to current structural inadequacy. FWD testing identified structurally inadequate conditions in select lanes, particularly in the outside (Lane 2) travel lanes. Mill-and-overlay rehabilitation using ARHM-GG-C with localized 6.5-inch full-depth AC patches was recommended.

Cow Camp Road, Rancho Mission Viejo, CA: Pavement design services to support Project Report and final design PS&E for a 4-mile arterial roadway between Antonio Pkwy and Ortega Hwy on the north side of San Juan Creek.

Bristol Street North and Spy Glass Hill Road Pavement Evaluation Projects, City of Newport Beach, CA, 2024-2025: Pavement design engineer overseeing the evaluation of Bristol Street North from Campus Drive to Jamboree Road (approximately 4,000 centerline feet) and Spy Glass Hill Road from San Miguel Drive to San Joaquin Hills Road (approximately 6,000 centerline feet), including pavement surface condition assessments, falling weight deflectometer (FWD) testing, corings, laboratory testing, and development of pavement improvement recommendations. Bristol Street North carries a Traffic Index of 10.5 and was found to be structurally adequate; Spy Glass Hill Road carries a TI of 8.0 with structural inadequacy identified in the southbound lane. Mill-and-overlay rehabilitation using ARHM-GGC with localized full-depth AC patches was recommended for both segments, with an AC leveling course specified for Bristol Street North to address delamination potential.

South Beach Boulevard Pavement Evaluation Project (Anacapa Way to Ball Road), City of Anaheim, CA, 2025: Pavement design engineer overseeing the evaluation of approximately 7,400 centerline feet of South Beach Boulevard, a major 8-lane arterial, including pavement surface condition assessment, corings, laboratory testing, mapping of localized AC repair areas, and development of pavement improvement recommendations.

Evaluation identified that portions resurfaced circa 2018-2019 with rubberized AC remain in

Page 783 of 989 ends

Roger W. Schlierkamp 8
good condition, while other areas exhibited load-related distress where missing aggregate base layers reduced structural capacity. Two mill-and-overlay rehabilitation alternatives were developed, one using ARHM-GG-C and one using conventional AC, with 12-inch full-depth localized patches and AC leveling course to address delamination potential. Pavement preservation (crack fill and slurry seal) was recommended for segments still in good condition.

North Blue Gum Street Pavement Evaluation Project (La Palma Avenue to Miraloma Avenue), City of Anaheim, CA, 2025: Pavement design engineer overseeing the evaluation of approximately 2,700 centerline feet of North Blue Gum Street, including pavement surface condition assessment, falling weight deflectometer (FWD) testing, corings, laboratory testing, mapping of localized AC repair areas, and development of pavement improvement recommendations. The roadway carries a Traffic Index of 11.4, with heavy trash truck traffic accelerating pavement deterioration. Review of the 2018 pavement improvement project revealed that areas receiving full-depth AC reconstruction or JPCP are performing well, while areas that received only mill-and-overlay have deteriorated. Three improvement alternatives were developed: (1) mill-and-overlay with fiber-reinforced ARHM and localized repairs, (2) mill-and-overlay with conventional AC and localized repairs, and (3) 12-inch jointed plain concrete pavement (JPCP) to achieve a 40-year design life for high-traffic areas.

East La Palma Avenue Pavement Evaluation Project (North Blue Gum Street to North Miller Street), City of Anaheim, CA, 2025: Pavement design engineer overseeing the evaluation of approximately 7,000 centerline feet of East La Palma Avenue, a 6-lane arterial carrying a Traffic Index of 12.9, including pavement surface condition assessments, corings, laboratory testing, and development of pavement improvement recommendations. Conditions varied from "Good" in recently improved areas to "Very Poor" in segments exhibiting severe load-related and aging-related distress. Segment-specific strategies were developed: ARAM and slurry seal preservation for segments in good condition, mill-and-overlay rehabilitation using ARHM or fiber-reinforced AC for 10-year design life, and full-depth reconstruction — either conventional remove-and-replace or full-depth reclamation with cement treatment (FDR-C) — for 20-year design life.

Brookhurst Street Pavement Evaluation Project (Ball Road to La Palma Avenue), City of Anaheim, CA, 2024: Pavement design engineer performing and overseeing the pavement evaluation of approximately 10,700 centerline feet of Brookhurst Street, a 6-lane arterial carrying a Traffic Index of 11.5, including pavement surface condition assessment, groundpenetrating radar (GPR) testing, corings, laboratory testing, and development of pavement improvement recommendations. Conditions ranged from "Fair" to "Poor," with high-severity alligator cracking concentrated within the wheel paths near the northern project limits. Two mill-and-overlay rehabilitation alternatives were developed using fiber-reinforced AC and fiber-reinforced ARHM, with 11-inch full-depth localized AC patches and AC leveling course to address delamination potential.
2026 Residential Streets Pavement Evaluation Projects, City of Garden Grove, CA, 2025-2026: Pavement design engineer overseeing the evaluation of 21 residential street segments across two phases of work, including pavement surface condition assessments, falling weight deflectometer (FWD) testing, corings, laboratory testing, analysis, and development of pavement improvement recommendations. Conditions ranged from "Poor" to "Serious," with distresses driven by a combination of structural deficiencies, aging, shallow groundwater (encountered at approximately 4 feet at many locations), and separated AC lifts from insufficient tack application during prior construction. Two improvement alternatives were developed for each phase: (1) ARAM followed by slurry seal with localized repairs as a nearPage 784 of 989 Roger W. Schlierkamp 9
term strategy, and (2) full-depth reconstruction, including full-depth reclamation with cement treatment (FDR-C) for segments with inadequate subgrade support and full-depth AC reconstruction for segments with suitable subgrade materials to achieve a 20-year design life.

Western Avenue and Carie Lane Pavement Evaluation Project, City of Stanton, CA, 2025-2026: Pavement design engineer overseeing the evaluation of Western Avenue from Chapman Avenue to West Cerritos Avenue and Carie Lane, including pavement surface condition assessments, corings, laboratory testing, analysis, and development of pavement improvement recommendations. Western Avenue carries a Traffic Index of up to 10.5, and the existing pavement was found to provide less than half the structural capacity required for the anticipated traffic loading, with heavy trash truck traffic from nearby recycling facilities contributing to accelerated deterioration. Two improvement alternatives were developed for Western Avenue: (1) edge-mill and ARHM overlay with fiber-reinforced AC leveling course and localized full-depth repairs, and (2) full-depth reclamation with cement treatment (FDRC) reconstruction with up to 15 inches of CSPB and 8 inches of AC to achieve a 20-year design life. Full-depth AC reconstruction was recommended for Carie Lane.

Magnolia Street Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) Subsurface Void Investigation, City of Westminster, CA, 2024: Performed GPR testing and analysis along Magnolia Street between Jennrich Avenue and Grandville Circle to assess potential subsurface voids following a 16-inch water main break that caused a sinkhole approximately 10 by 20 feet in size. Testing utilized both a 2.0 GHz air horn antenna for pavement structure evaluation and a 400 MHz ground-coupled antenna for deeper subsurface scanning to approximately 10 feet. Anomalies were identified and cross-referenced with utility records to support the City's permanent roadway repair.

MacArthur Boulevard and Sand Canyon Avenue Pavement Evaluation Projects, City of Irvine, CA, 2022-2023: Pavement design engineer overseeing the evaluation of MacArthur Boulevard from Campus Drive to Main Street (approximately 1.1 miles) and Sand Canyon Avenue from Quail Hill Parkway to Barranca Parkway (approximately 0.9 miles), including pavement surface condition assessments, 19 pavement corings, falling weight deflectometer (FWD) testing at approximately 400 locations, laboratory testing, analysis, and development of segment-specific pavement rehabilitation recommendations with multiple alternatives per segment. Traffic indices ranged from 10.0 to 10.5. MacArthur Boulevard was structurally adequate with rehabilitation recommended to address aging-related distress and reflective cracking. Sand Canyon Avenue between Quail Hill Parkway and Alton Parkway was structurally deficient, requiring CSPB reconstruction or geotextile-reinforced remove-andreplace alternatives.

Irvine Boulevard, Walnut Avenue, Trabuco Road, and Irvine Center Drive Pavement Evaluation Projects, City of Irvine, CA, 2021-2022: Pavement design engineer overseeing the evaluation of 4 major arterial segments located throughout the City of Irvine, including review of as-built drawings, pavement surface condition assessments, 36 pavement corings, falling weight deflectometer (FWD) testing at approximately 620 locations, laboratory testing, analysis, and development of segment-specific pavement rehabilitation recommendations with multiple alternatives per segment. Traffic indices ranged from 10.0 to 11.0. Deflection testing identified structural deficiencies along Irvine Boulevard, Walnut Avenue, and a portion of Irvine Center Drive, while Trabuco Road was structurally adequate with reflective cracking design governing the overlay recommendations. Walnut Avenue between The Mall and Culver Drive required full reconstruction due to significant structural deficiency and high subgrade

Page 785 of 989 ends

Roger W. Schlierkamp 10
moisture content, with CSPB, conventional remove-and-replace, and geotextile-reinforced alternatives developed. Settlement along portions of Trabuco Road was identified, with further geotechnical investigation recommended.

Annual Street Resurfacing Projects, City of San Fernando, 2020 - Present: Oversaw the pavement evaluation, design, preparation of plans/specifications, and construction-support services for City of San Fernando’s Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3 Street Resurfacing Projects. Each phase reflects a separate annual project and generally involves localized repairs and a combination of surface treatments, including micro-surfacing, chip sealing, and slurry sealing. Upon completing the Phase 3 project, approximately 75 percent of the city’s roadway network was resurfaced.

Main Street from E 228th Street to E Lomita Boulevard, City of Carson, CA, September 2024: Pavement design engineer performing and overseeing the pavement evaluation of Main Street, including corings, laboratory testing, and analysis.

South Serrano Ave from Nohl Ranch Road to South Weir Canyon Road Pavement Evaluation Project, City of Anaheim, CA, May 2023: Pavement design engineer overseeing the evaluation of this roadway segment, including pavement surface condition assessment, corings, falling weight deflectometer testing, laboratory testing, analysis, and development of pavement rehabilitation recommendations.

Harbor Boulevard Pavement Evaluation Project (Lincoln Avenue to North Street), City of Anaheim, CA, 2024: Pavement design engineer performing and overseeing the pavement evaluation of approximately 3,300 centerline feet of Harbor Boulevard, including pavement surface condition assessment, corings, laboratory testing, analysis, and development of pavement improvement recommendations. Coring revealed treated base underlying most of the roadway and top-down alligator cracking penetrating 2 to 4 inches deep within the wheel paths. Two mill-and-overlay rehabilitation alternatives were developed using fiber-reinforced AC and fiber-reinforced ARHM, with 12.5-inch full-depth localized AC patches and AC leveling course to address delamination potential.

Eastern Avenue from Huntington Drive to Valley Boulevard, City of Los Angeles, CA, December 2023: Managed a comprehensive pavement evaluation along a 1.4-mile arterial corridor, integrating ASTM D6433 condition surveys, coring, Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) testing, and ground penetrating radar (GPR) to characterize structural capacity and layer composition. Analyzed variable pavement sections, including asphalt concrete over legacy PCC, and identified key distress mechanisms such as aging, load-related failure, and reflective cracking. Developed segment-specific rehabilitation strategies, including full-depth reconstruction and mill-and-overlay alternatives, supported by Caltrans HDM-based structural design and deflection analysis. Provided construction considerations for subgrade instability and variable underlying conditions to support reliable long-term pavement performance.

Camino Capistrano, City of San Juan Capistrano, CA 2016-2023: Pavement design engineer performing and overseeing the pavement evaluation of various segments of Camino Capistrano, including corings, ground-penetrating radar (GPR) testing to identify approximate limits of buried underlying PCC, laboratory testing, and analysis. Roger also oversaw the project during construction, managing construction materials observation and testing.

Hamilton Ave., Heil Ave., and Bolsa Ave. Pavement Evaluation Projects, City of Huntington Beach, CA, June 2023: Pavement design engineer overseeing the evaluation of

Page 786 of 989 ends

Roger W. Schlierkamp 11
4 major arterial segments located throughout the city of Huntington Beach, including pavement surface condition assessment, corings, falling weight deflectometer testing, laboratory testing, analysis, and development of pavement rehabilitation recommendations.

Crenshaw Boulevard from 79th Street to I-105 Freeway, City of Inglewood, CA, July 2023: Pavement design engineer performing and overseeing the pavement evaluation of Crenshaw Boulevard, including corings, laboratory testing, analysis, localized AC and PCC patch repair mapping, and development of pavement improvement strategy recommendations.

Harbor Blvd., Frontera St., and Nohl Ranch Road Ave. Pavement Evaluation Projects, City of Anaheim, CA, October 2021: Pavement design engineer overseeing the evaluation of 3 arterial segments located throughout the City of Anaheim, including pavement surface condition assessment, corings, falling weight deflectometer testing, laboratory testing, analysis, and development of pavement rehabilitation recommendations.

Los Patrones Parkway, Rancho Mission Viejo, CA: Pavement design engineer for the 5- mile long, new alignment of Los Patrones Parkway between Oso Parkway and Cow Camp Road. Various alternative designs were evaluated and the selected pavement design involved the use of cement-stabilized soil (CSS) to reduce pavement construction costs by approximately 40%. During construction, Roger provided engineering support and reviewed QC/QA test results of CSS, aggregate base, AC, and PCC roadway.

Various Pavement Improvement Projects for OCPW, Orange County, CA, January 2021:

Pavement design engineer overseeing pavement condition assessment, coring, lab testing, analysis, and development of pavement design recommendations for various OCPW projects, including Carbon Canyon Regional Park Pavement Rehabilitation Project and Strands Beach at Salt Creek Parking Lot Pavement Evaluation Project.

Glenn Ranch Road Pavement Evaluation, City of Lake Forest, CA, January 2021:

Pavement evaluation and design, including deflection testing analysis, coring, lab testing of Glenn Ranch Road arterial street.

Los Monteros Homeowners Association Pavement Repair Project, South Coast Water District, Dana Point, CA, July 2020: Unstable subgrade conditions were exposed during waterline repairs. Roger performed and managed pavement surface condition assessments, pavement corings, dynamic cone penetrometer testing, laboratory testing, and the development of cost-effective pavement repair recommendations (geogrid subgrade stabilization and full-depth reclamation with cement treatment recommendation strategies) to address unstable subgrade conditions. During construction, Roger managed quality assurance observation and testing services, including compaction testing. 2020 “Phase 1” Citywide Pavement Evaluation Project, City of Aliso Viejo, CA, December 2020 to January 2021: Pavement design engineer overseeing pavement condition assessments, corings, laboratory testing, analysis, and pavement repair recommendations of arterial and residential street segments. One of the primary objectives was to address concerns regarding the lack of aggregate base beneath most of the city streets and how its absence could impact pavement performance.

East Coast Highway (MacArthur Blvd. to Newport Coast Dr.) Pavement Evaluation Project, City of Newport Beach, CA: Pavement design engineering overseeing the evaluation of the busy arterial roadway East Coast Highway (a.k.a. Pacific Coast Highway),

Page 787 of 989 ends

Roger W. Schlierkamp 12
including falling weight deflectometer (FWD or deflection) testing to evaluate the roadway’s current structural capacity and ground-penetrating radar (GPR) testing to evaluate locations of underlying PCC pavement.

North Hill Avenue, City of Pasadena, CA (2021): Evaluated two AC pavement intersections along North Hill Avenue (East Topeka Street and North Hill Avenue) in the City of Pasadena to support the North Hill Avenue Complete Streets Project.

Market Street (LA River to Cherry Avenue) Pavement Evaluation Project, City of Long Beach, CA (2020): Evaluated PCC and AC pavement, and developed PCC and AC pavement rehabilitation recommendations.

Colima Road Rehabilitation, City of Whittier, CA: Pavement evaluation of Colima Road, from Lambert Road to Mar Vista Street, and developed pavement reconstruction recommendations to achieve a 20-year design life.

City of Torrance, CA, Plaza Del Amo at Western Mobility Enhancement Project, April 2019: Performed pavement evaluation/design of existing roadway as well as widened roadway.

FY 2018-19 Pavement Maintenance/Repair Project, City of Dana Point, CA, Winter 2018- May 2019: Performed pavement surface condition assessments of various streets throughout City of Dana Point, prioritized streets for maintenance/repair, recommended maintenance/repair strategies, reviewed/developed pavement-related specifications, oversaw quality assurance observation/testing services during the construction phase.

Annual Residential Slurry Seal FY 2021-22 Project, City of Dana Point, CA: Oversight and management of rubberized polymer-modified slurry (RPMS) seal observation and testing services.

Bonita Canyon Drive and Ford Road Pavement Evaluation, City of Newport Beach, CA, March 2019–June 2019: Performed pavement evaluation consisting of pavement surface condition assessments, corings, deflection testing, lab testing, analysis, and development of pavement rehabilitation recommendations.

Bison Avenue, San Joaquin Hills Road, San Nicolas Pavement Evaluation, City of Newport Beach, CA, November 2018-May 2019: Performed pavement evaluation consisting of pavement surface condition assessments, corings, deflection testing, lab testing, analysis, and development of pavement rehabilitation recommendations.

Crenshaw Boulevard Rehabilitation Project, City of Torrance, CA, April 2019: Performed pavement evaluation and developed pavement rehabilitation recommendations.

Various Pavement Evaluation Project, City of Lake Forest, CA. Performed pavement evaluation for various pavement CIP projects, including Portola Parkway (2015), Dimension Drive (2015), Civic Center Drive (2016), etc.

Page 788 of 989 ends

30336 Esperanza, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688 | ph: 949.888.6513 | fax: 949.888.1380 | web: www.gmugeo.com MICHAEL B. MOSCROP, M.SC., PE, RGE
President
Senior Principal

PROFESSION
Geotechnical Engineer

REGISTRATIONS
Registered Civil Engineer,
State of California
Registered Geotechnical Engineer,
State of California

EDUCATION
M.S. Civil Engineering, 1999
Geotechnical Engineering,
California State University,
Long Beach.

B.S. Honors, Geography, 1985
Dept. of Geographical Sciences,
Huddersfield University,
England.

Thesis: “Peat Erosion and
Reservoir Sedimentation in the
Southern Pennines, England.”

PROFESSIONAL

EXPERIENCE
GMU Geotechnical Inc.
(2005 – Present)
Vice President, Principal
Geotechnical Engineer
Lejman Geotechnical Group
Incorporated, (1996-2005)
Vice President, Principal
Geotechnical Engineer
Lejman and Lee, Inc. (1986-1996)
Lab/Field Technician to Project
Engineer

PROFESSIONAL

AFFILIATIONS
ACI, ASTM, ASCE – Member,
CalGeo - President

SUMMARY OF EXPERIENCE & QUALIFICATIONS
Mr. Moscrop has 35 years of experience on a wide variety of geotechnical engineering projects. His experience includes working with residential, commercial, and industrial
developers, water districts and public agencies, including performing geotechnical review services for various Cities and the County of Orange. In addition, he has served as an expert witness in regard to a variety of geotechnical issues over the last 15+ years. Mr. Moscrop’s responsibilities also include overseeing GMU’s state-of-the-art in-house
geotechnical laboratory. He has worked successfully on the following types of projects:
• Transportation Projects (Major Roadways and Bridges)
• Commercial, Industrial, and Retail Projects
• Master-Planned Communities
• Residential and Custom Lot Projects
• Landslide/Slope Stability Investigations & Slope Repairs • Dredging Studies
• Harbor and Marine Projects
• Geotechnical Review Services
• Pavement Engineering Projects
• Seismic Hazard Analyses
• Groundwater Studies
• Water Infrastructure Projects
• Miscellaneous Utility Projects
• Moisture Intrusion Evaluations
• Geotechnical Instrumentation
• Public Works Projects
• Various Forensic Evaluations
• Expert Witness Testimony

Page 789 of 989 ends

Michael B. Moscrop 2

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
GMU Geotechnical Inc., Vice President and Principal Geotechnical Engineer (May 2005 – Present)
Lejman Geotechnical Group Incorporated, Vice President and Principal Engineer (November 1996 – April 2005)
Project manager, engineer, and expert witness for forensic evaluations of residential, commercial, and industrial construction, primarily for the legal and insurance professions.

Geotechnical review services for the County of Orange. Responsibilities include expert testimony, attendance and participation in mediation, expert meetings and settlement conferences, preparation of declarations and exhibits/displays for mediation and trial. Project management, maintaining client contact, development and implementation of subsurface investigations, site inspections, document research and review, engineering analysis, formulating repair recommendations, report writing, proposal and estimate preparation.

Manager of Cal-trans certified Geotechnical and Materials Laboratory. Lab performs a full range of soil and rock testing including custom testing for select clients. In addition, the lab performs a full range of pavement testing.

Lejman & Lee, Incorporated, Project Engineer/Project Manager (June 1990 to November 1996)
Project manager and engineer for forensic evaluations of distress to residential, commercial and industrial structures, primarily for the insurance and legal professions. Responsibilities included project management, maintaining client contact, development and implementation of subsurface investigations, sampling and geotechnically logging subsurface exploration, site inspections, geotechnical cross-sections, seismic analysis, document research and review, engineering analysis, formulating repair recommendations, report writing, proposal and estimate preparation.

Extensive experience in the design, installation, operation, monitoring, data reduction and engineering analysis of results of geotechnical field instrumentation. These include slope inclinometers, tiltmeters, tensiometers, manometers, pneumatic and open standpipe piezometers, settlement plates and crack monitors.

Additional projects involved with included: residential and commercial development, large landslide investigations, dredging studies, and numerous infrastructure projects including metering stations, highway bridges, RCB culverts, large diameter pipelines and large highway embankment over soft alluvium.

Responsibilities also entailed supervising, scheduling, training, and hiring laboratory, field, staff engineering and drafting personnel. Supervised laboratory management and testing, with duties including assigning testing programs, scheduling, evaluating data reduction and validity, quality assurance, overseeing testing, equipment procurement and calibration.

Page 790 of 989 ends

Michael B. Moscrop 3
Lejman & Lee, Incorporated, Lab Manager/Staff Engineer
(June 1988 – June 1990)
Laboratory: Responsible for the management of geotechnical testing. This included assigning and overseeing testing, implementing lab programs through completion, and evaluating data validity. Responsible for training lab personnel in all aspects of testing, including triaxial shear strength determinations. Maintained, calibrated, updated and purchased lab equipment.

Designed, built, and implemented an automated triaxial testing system, automated and computercontrolled direct shear testing apparatus.

Field Technician: Responsible for numerous grading projects. Carried projects from initial inspection through to report writing and drafting of appurtenant maps. Duties also included training field personnel. Construction monitoring involved pile driving, caisson installation and repair, stone columns, drilled shafts, RCB culvert, large diameter pipelines and compaction grouting operations.

Staff Engineer: Responsible for the implementation of subsurface investigations, primarily for forensic evaluations and damage investigations of commercial and residential construction.

Duties included document research and review, geological logging of borings and test pits, manometer surveys, distress inventories, evaluation and engineering analysis of results, and report preparation. Responsible for the installation, monitoring, data reduction, and interpretation of geotechnical instrumentation.

Lejman & Lee, Incorporated: Field/Laboratory Technician (October 1986 – June 1988)
Performed all facets of laboratory testing. Assisted on geotechnical investigations for infrastructure projects and distress evaluations. Installed and monitored geotechnical instrumentation, including inclinometers, pneumatic transducers, tiltmeters, crack monitors and settlement plates. Performed a wide range of drafting, data reduction and computer analysis.

Field technician on large and small residential, commercial and infrastructure grading projects.

PAPERS AND SPEAKING ENGAGEMENTS
California Geotechnical Engineers Association Annual Conference, Carmel, California, April 12, 2003.

Subject: Slab Moisture Intrusion.

Oxnard and Ventura School Districts; Workshop for Design, Construction and Management Team, May, 1998.

Subject: West Slabs, A Titanic Issue – or Just a Passing Iceberg? Moscrop, M. B., (1999) “Moisture Transmission Through Concrete Floor Slabs-On-Grade” Unpub. M. Sc. Dissertation, California State University Long Beach

Page 791 of 989 ends

Michael B. Moscrop 4
Moscrop, M. B., (1985) “The influence of Topography on the Spatial Dimensions and Temporal Variations of the Dynamic Hillslope Contributing Area in a Small Sub-Catchment of Low Relief.” Unpub. B. Sc. Dissertation, Dept. of Geographical Sciences, Huddersfield University.

Moscrop, M. B., et al. (1985) “Peat Erosion and Reservoir Sedimentation in the Southern Pennines.” Unpub. B. Sc. Thesis, Dept. of Geographical Sciences, Huddersfield Polytechnic.

SEMINARS AND SHORT COURSES
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS: 28th Spring Seminar; Lateral Spread & Impact Fill Placement, Dr. L. Youd, Dr. T. Stark & Dr. P. Liu, April 2005.

CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION: “In-Situ Density Testing using TDR; Advances in Slope Inclinometer Data Analysis; Grading Code, Guidelines and Standards of Practice”, Gary Durham, Erik Mikkelsen, Dr. Coduto, Kauai, Hawaii, April 6-8, 2005.

AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS: Pavement Design Seminar by Steve Marvin & Mike Costello, Santa Ana, California, September 24, 2004.

SOIL RETENTION SEMINAR: Sponsored by Soil Retention Systems, Lecture by Dov Leshchinsky, Carlsbad, California, February 24, 2004.

STARK CONSULTANTS, INC: “Analysis of Landslides: Shear Strengths, Testing, and Stability Methods”, Short Course by Dr. Timothy D. Stark, P.E., Los Angles, California, March 2003.

SLOPE INDICATOR: Short Course on Data Reduction & Error Correction for Inclinometers by Erik Mikkelsen, Ventura, California, September 17 & 18, 2002.

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EARTHQUAKE CENTRE, “Recommended Procedures for Implementation of DMG Special Publication 117: Guidelines for Analyzing and Mitigating Landslide Hazards in California”, USC, June 20 - 21, 2002.

GREGG IN-SITU, INC.: A Short Course on Cone Penetration Testing, presented by Dr. Peter K.

Robertson, University of Alberta, Canada and David J. Woeller, Conetec Investigation, Ltd., Long Beach, California, May 6, 2002.

AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS: Landslides: Shear Strengths and Stability Analysis, Dr. T. Stark, January 2001.

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY: Evaluation & Mitigation of Seismic Hazards Short Course, Dr. R.B. Seed, Dr. I.M. Idriss, Dr. G.R. Martin, Dr. N.A. Abrahamson, Dr. J.D. Bray, Dr. J.P.

Stewart, August 17 - 19, 2000.

COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY: Building on Expansive and Collapsing Soils, Dr. J. Nelson, April 2000.

Page 792 of 989 ends

Michael B. Moscrop 5
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS: 23rd Spring Seminar, K Ishihara, R. Whitman, J.

Stewart and J. Bartlet, April 2000.

POST-TENSIONING INSTITUTE: Design of Foundations on Expansive Soils, Houston, Texas, November 1999.

SOUTH COAST GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY: Geotechnical Applications of Time Domain Reflectometry (TDR) with Applications to Remote Landslide Monitoring:, W.F. Kane, Ph. D., June 1999.

AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS: 22nd Spring Seminar, R. Peck, R.G. Goodman and J.

Rogers, May 1999.

WEST COAST CASUALTY’S: Annual Construction Defect Seminar, May 1999.

AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS: Geotechnical Engineering Division: Long Term Performance of Compacted Fills and Embankments, Dr. I. Noorany. March 1999.

LA BASIN GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY: Ground Fissures in the Southwestern United States: “An Increasing Geotechnical Challenge”, Dr. R.J. Shlemon, February 1999.

WORLD OF CONCRETE: “Solving Moisture-Related Problems with Slabs-on-Grade”, Peter Craig & Herman Protze III, January 1999, Las Vegas, Nevada.

WORLD OF CONCRETE: “Troubleshooting Concrete Cracks”, A. Gustaferro & C. Turton, January 1999, Las Vegas, Nevada.

AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS: 21st Annual Spring Seminar, “Soil Liquefaction Engineering in a Rapidly Changing World”, Raymond B. Seed, Ph.D., March 1998.

POST-TENSIONING INSTITUTE: Current Practice and Advancements of Post-Tensioned Residential Slabs on Expansive Soil, November 1997.

ACADEMY OF TEXTILES AND FLOORING: Hard Surface Inspectors Course - Inspecting Resilient, Ceramic and Wood Flooring, October 1997.

ACADEMY OF TEXTILES AND FLOORING: Vapor Emission Testing and Moisture Related Flooring Failures on Concrete Foundations, October 20 - 25, 1997.

AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE: Concrete Slabs on Grade, October 1997.

CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION: Design and Construction Guidelines for Downdrag on Uncoated and Bitumen-Coated Piles, Dr. Jean-Louis Briaud, June 1997.

AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS: 2nd Annual Seminar on Issues in Forensic Engineering “The Engineer as an Expert Witness”, UCI, May 1997.

AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS: 20th Annual Spring Seminar: Geosynthetics in New and Emerging Uses, R.M. Koerner, May 1997.

UNIVERSITY CALIFORNIA IRVINE: California Construction Defect Law for Community Associations, April 1997.

Page 793 of 989 ends

Michael B. Moscrop 6
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS: Geotechnical Engineering Group: Seismic Design of Foundations, February 1997.

CHEMICAL LIME COMPANY: Lime Stabilization: A Technical Overview, D.N. Little, Ph.D., P.E., February 1997.

AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS: Geotechnical Engineering Group: Seismic Performance of Hillside Fills, A. Kropp, September 1996.

ASPHALT INSTITUTE: Asphalt Pavements-Principles of Construction of Quality Hot-Mix, May 1996.

ASPHALT INSTITUTE: Asphalt Technology Workshop, Superpave-The Future of Asphalt Mix Design, May 1996.

CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION: Soil Design Parameters for PostTensioned Concrete Slabs, Dr. R. Lytton, May 1996.

AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS: 19th Annual Spring Seminar: Earthquake Induced Liquefaction, I.M. Idriss, April 1996.

AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS: Geotechnical Engineering Group: Seismic Behavior and Stability of Embankment Dams, Dr. F.I. Makdisi, December 1995.

SOUTH COAST GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY: Geotechnical and Practical Considerations for Design of Shallow Foundations Bearing on Expansive Soils, Dr. W.K. Wray, June 1995.

AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS: Geotechnical Engineering Group: Interpretation and Comparison of Collapse Measurement Techniques, Dr. S.L. Houston and Dr. W.N. Houston, September 1994.

AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS: 17th Annual Spring Seminar; Slope Stability Evaluation and Analysis, J. Duncan, Ph.D., April 1994.

BRAINARD-KILMAN: Geotechnical Laboratory Testing Short Course Triaxial and Permeability Testing, W. DeGroff, February 1991.

AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS: 13th Annual Spring Seminar in Soft Ground Engineering by C. Ladd, April 1990.

GONZAGA UNIVERSITY: Soil Compaction Short Course by F.C. Budinger, G.E., October 1989.

UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-ROLLA: 15th Annual Quality Geotechnical Laboratory Testing Short Course, May 1989.

Page 794 of 989 ends

30336 Esperanza, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688 | ph: 949.888.6513 | fax: 949.888.1380 | web: www.gmugeo.com LISA L. BATES, PG, CEG
Associate Geologist
Director of Municipal Geotechnical and Engineering Services

PROFESSION
Engineering Geologist

REGISTRATIONS
Certified Engineering Geologist,
State of California
Professional Geologist,
State of California

CERTIFICATIONS
Qualified SWPPP Practitioner,
State of California
Qualified SWPPP Designer,
State of California

EDUCATION
B.S., Geological Sciences,
University of California, Santa
Barbara
Summer Field Studies, Oregon
State University

AFFILIATIONS
National Association of Women In
Construction, Orange County
Chapter – Past Chapter President
(NAWIC)
South Coast Geological Society
Lisa has over 26 years of experience in various aspects of the geotechnical field. She has worked successfully with
homeowners’ associations, residential and commercial
developers, master community planners, and governmental agencies on both private and public works projects. She has extensive experience in a wide variety of projects including:
residential and commercial development, public works
projects, hillside grading, landslide investigation and mitigation, and forensic investigations. Ms. Bates excels at landslide and slope failure investigations and repairs, and has worked with many homeowners’ associations on slope issues.

In addition, she has served as an expert witness for several legal matters. She is also the Reviewing Geologist for several public agencies. Her goal is to provide an outstanding product to her clients in a timely and cost efficient manner, while upholding the high standards and mission of GMU. Selected project categories representative of Ms. Bates’ experience are
described below:
• Landslide/Slope Failure Investigation and Repair
• Construction Management
• Geotechnical Review/Consulting Services for Multiple
Cities
• Public Works Projects
• Fault Studies
• Legal Consultation
• Residential/Commercial Projects
• Single Family Residential Custom Developments
Additional information and notable projects from Lisa’s portfolio are summarized on the following pages.

Page 795 of 989 ends

Lisa L. Bates 2

LANDSLIDE/SLOPE FAILURE INVESTIGATION AND/OR REPAIR
Ms. Bates’ experience investigating and/or repairing landslides, slope failures, and erosion includes dozens of projects. The list below includes highlights of her project experience, including high-profile or complex landslides.
• Hacienda Road, La Habra Heights - City of La Habra Heights: Project included geotechnical investigation of a portion of roadway with steep natural slopes and existing distress. Investigation included large and small diameter borings, installation and monitoring of a slope inclinometer, geologic analyses, and development of repair options. Project also included development of design repair plans and specifications, as well as coordination with bidders and impacted agencies. • Poppy Trail Landslide, Rolling Hills – California Joint Powers Insurance Authority: Project included geotechnical investigation and design of repair of a large landslide within a hillside residential area.

Challenges included steep terrain, adjacent properties, and complex geology. Duties included geologic investigation and grading observations, project oversight, and construction management advisor services.
• Philemon Landslide, Dana Point – Private Developer: Project included geotechnical investigation and design of repair of a landslide impacting four residential structures. Challenges included existing residences and adjacent properties, adverse geologic structure, and poor shear strengths for onsite soils.

Repair design included innovative slurry backfill of keyway excavation. Duties included geologic investigation, project oversight, and grading observations. Project won 2014 CalGeo Project Award and was presented at 2013 Geo-Congress in San Diego.
• Horseshoe Landslide, Anaheim Hills – Homeowners Association: Project included emergency geotechnical services after re-activation of ancient landslide within developed area. Duties included geotechnical investigation, construction management advisor services, long-term monitoring, groundwater monitoring, development of repair plan, coordination with the Association and their legal counsel, and communication with public agencies. Landslide is underlain by complex geology, and crosses City boundary.
• Portuguese Bend Landslide Complex, Rancho Palos Verdes – Various Clients: Multiple projects within the ancient landslide complex included investigations of:
o Active Portuguese Bend Landslide
o “Parcel 4” Landslide
o Abalone Cove Landslide
Tasks included coordinating complex geologic field investigations with multiple drilling methodologies, analyzing data collected to prepare maps and geologic cross-sections, creation of a structure contour map of the entire landslide complex, and development of mitigation measures to stabilize the landslides.
• South Shores Landslide, Rancho Palos Verdes – Harris & Associates: Project included study of the inactive landslide’s potential impact on a new storm drain system, including large diameter and continuous core drilling, analyses, and development of conceptual designs.

Page 796 of 989 ends

Lisa L. Bates 3

CONSULTANT TO PUBLIC AGENCIES
Lisa has over 26 years’ experience working with various governing agencies, including 20 years providing on-call geotechnical services to a variety of agency clients. A chronological list of Ms. Bates’ experience is described below:
• City of Aliso Viejo (2011 to 2012):
o Construction Observation
o Emergency Services (Slope Failures)
• City of Rancho Santa Margarita (2008 to current):
o Development Reviews
o Geotechnical Investigation and Design
• City of Laguna Niguel (2002 to current):
o Development Reviews (Building, Grading, and Planning/Entitlement) o Geotechnical Investigation and Design
o Construction Observation
o Emergency Services (Landslides, Public Safety, “Red Tagging”, etc.) o Geotechnical Monitoring
• City of Chino Hills (2002 to current):
o Development Reviews (Building, Grading, and Planning/Entitlement) o Geotechnical Investigation and Design
o Construction Observation
o Emergency Services (Landslides, Public Safety, etc.)
o Geotechnical Monitoring
• City of Dana Point (2008 to current):
o Geotechnical Investigation and Design
o Construction Observation
o Emergency Services (Slope Failures, Blufftop Failures, Public Safety, etc.) o Geotechnical Monitoring
• City of Laguna Hills (2010 to 2020):
o Development Reviews (Grading, Planning, and Entitlement) o Geotechnical Investigation and Design
• City of Mission Viejo (2016 to current):
o Development Reviews (Engineering)
o Geotechnical Investigation and Design
o Construction Observation
o Emergency Services (Landslides, Public Safety, etc.)
o Geotechnical Monitoring
• City of Anaheim (2021 to current):
o Development Reviews (Engineering)

Page 797 of 989 ends

Lisa L. Bates 4
• City of Laguna Beach (2022 to present):
o Development Reviews (Hydrology and WQMP)

Page 798 of 989 ends

Lisa L. Bates 5

RESIDENTIAL/COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT
• Cielo Vista Residential Development, County of Orange – Residential development planned on undeveloped land required fault studies, geotechnical investigation, and foundation investigation for entrance bridge. Tasks included developing recommendations for rough grading, retaining wall, bridge, and residential structure design and providing design input during plan preparation. Provided project management for structural design of retaining and MSE walls. Project required approval from MWD for geotechnical impacts to existing Lower Feeder pipeline, involving detailed analyses, multiple meetings with MWD staff, and coordination of responses to MWD requirements and comments.

Project is currently under construction, with GMU providing geotechnical observation and testing, materials testing, and Special Inspection services, as well as vibration monitoring services.

• Talega, San Clemente – Geotechnical investigation and geotechnical design recommendations for master planned community, including landslide and slope stability mitigation for hillside development.

Investigation included drilling and logging numerous bucket auger and hollow stem borings. • Geotechnical Investigation, Grading & Observations, Rancho Mission Viejo/DMB Ladera, LLC, Ladera Ranch – Geotechnical investigation and grading/construction observations of 8000+ unit master planned community. Tasks include drilling numerous bucket auger and hollow stem borings and geologic mapping and observation during mass and rough grading.

PUBLIC WORKS PROJECTS
• Lower Curtis Park Expansion Project, City of Mission Viejo – Geotechnical investigation for proposed park expansion to include 4 new sports fields and associated improvements. Project included study of multiple large landslides and impacts of proposed development on landslide stability. Project is currently under construction, including landslide removal, mass grading, and import of over 1 million cubic yards of fill soil.
• Tier 1, Tier 2, and Tier 3 Improvement Projects, Crown Valley Community Park, City of Laguna Niguel – Three phases of improvements at the City’s largest park included: New tot lot, splashground, amphitheater, parking lots, bridge, and community building, as well as retaining walls, and other nonstructural elements. Scope included geotechnical investigations and design support for these improvements, as well as construction geotechnical observations, testing, special inspection, nondestructive testing, and materials testing. • La Pata Avenue Gap Closure, South, County of Orange – Geotechnical investigation for proposed alignments of widening and extension of La Pata Avenue from Ortega Highway to San Clemente.

Project included study of multiple large landslide complexes, fault alignments, and complex geology. • La Pata Interim Widening for New High School, San Juan Capistrano – Capistrano Unified School District: Project included geotechnical investigation and construction observation during widening and re-paving of existing roadway.
• Reclaimed and Domestic Water Reservoirs, City of Chino Hills – Geotechnical investigation for proposed water reservoirs in semi-developed areas. Project included subsurface investigation for reservoir sites and access roadways as well as review of proposed plans. Scope during construction of reservoirs included geotechnical observation and testing, and special inspection. • Dana Point Harbor, City of Dana Point – Geotechnical investigation for redevelopment of existing

Page 799 of 989 ends

Lisa L. Bates 6
harbor facilities, including new parking structure, retail, restaurants, boat storage and supporting improvements.
• Long Beach Sports Park, Long Beach – Geotechnical investigation for planned recreational sports complex including artificial turf soccer and baseball fields, clubhouse/concessions, office building and skate park to be constructed on property used for oil field operations and debris disposal. Project included complex investigation to evaluate buried alluvial channel and marshland overlain by debris and fill soils, and development of geotechnical recommendations for corrective grading and design of structures.
• Sports Park, Chino Hills, City of Chino Hills – Project included geotechnical investigation, input on design, and construction observations during rough and precise grading, including paving and construction of artificial grass fields.
• City Hall, City of Laguna Niguel – Geotechnical investigation for proposed City Hall site on existing graded area. Project included subsurface investigation, design support, and grading observations. • Portuguese Bend Beach Club, Rancho Palos Verdes – Army Corps of Engineers: Geotechnical investigation for proposed seawall and buttress at toe of active Portuguese Bend landslide.

Investigation included design and analysis of alternative methods to preserve coastal environment. • Government Center, City of Chino Hills – Geotechnical investigation, design recommendations, plan review, and observation of construction of new civic center. Center includes new parking structure, City Hall, fire, and police buildings as well as residential development. • Ortega Highway (State Route 74) Widening between San Juan Creek and Orange/Riverside County Line, Orange County, Private Contractor – Project included providing on-call geotechnical services to general contractor, including evaluation of temporary slope stability in hard rock and rock fill.

FAULT STUDIES
• Cielo Vista Residential Development, County of Orange, North County BRS Project, LLC – Supplemental fault study of site crossed by Whittier Fault. Included excavation and detailed logging of over 500 feet of trench. Fault study analyses methodologies included fracture mechanics, physical characteristics, geomorphology, and datable sediments. Fault study reviewed and approved by County of Orange as part of development approval.

• The Ranch Plan, Orange County – Rancho Mission Viejo: Fault investigation of Mission Viejo fault located within proposed development bubble.
• Seacliff Shopping Center, Huntington Beach - Shea Homes: Fault investigation of branch of Newport-Inglewood fault zone located within Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Studies Zone for proposed shopping center. Investigation included extensive trenching and design review. • Hoag Hospital, Newport Beach - Hoag Hospital: Fault investigation of Newport-Inglewood fault zone and observation during grading of additional parking area and proposed structures. • Foothill Transportation Corridor, CP Alignment, Orange County - Transportation Corridor Agencies: Fault investigation of branch of Cristianitos fault crossing proposed toll road alignment.

Page 800 of 989 ends

Lisa L. Bates 7

LEGAL CONSULTATION
Ms. Bates has provided geotechnical consultation for litigation on a variety of projects for over 17 years in the State of California. She has been deposed, testified at trial, and participated in mitigation for several cases, including the following issues:
• Landslides
• Slope failure
• Construction dispute
• Slope repair
• Concrete type/source
PUBLICATIONS:

Silver, Gregory, Bates, Lisa, 2012, “Landslide Stabilization Using High Strength Aggregate-Cement Slurry”.

Page 801 of 989 ends

30336 Esperanza, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688 | ph: 330.622.0916 | fax: 949.888.1380 | web: www.gmugeo.com Amina Mannan, Ph.D., P.E.

Senior Engineer, Pavement & Geotechnical Engineering

PROFESSION
Civil Engineer

REGISTRATION
Registered Civil Engineer (C98114)
State of California

EDUCATION
Ph.D. Civil Engineering
University of New Mexico,
Albuquerque
M.S. Civil Engineering
University of Akron, Akron, OH
B.S. Civil Engineering
Bangladesh University of Engineering
and Technology, Dhaka Bangladesh

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
GMU Geotechnical, Inc., RSM, CA
(2023 – Present)
Senior Engineer
Arias & Associates, Inc. San Antonio, TX
(2018 – 2023)
Senior Pavement & Geotechnical
Engineer
Applied Research Associates Inc.,
Gainesville, FL
(Feb 2018 – Sept 2018)
Pavement Condition Consultant for
FDOT
University of New Mexico, Albuquerque,
NM
(2012 – 2017)
Graduate Researcher
University of Akron, Akron, OH
(2010 – 2012)
Graduate Researcher

AFFILIATIONS
American Society of Civil Engineer
(ASCE)

PUBLICATIONS
Author of over 40 journal and
conference publications in pavement
materials and engineering
Amina is a highly experienced senior pavement and
geotechnical engineer with 15 years of experience in
pavement engineering and 5 years of experience in
geotechnical engineering projects. Her expertise
includes pavement condition assessment, material
testing, pavement evaluation/design, pavement
condition index, specification development, and mix
design development projects. In addition, she has
experience in geotechnical engineering, such as site
investigation, geotechnical analysis and design,
foundation design, slope stability analysis, construction monitoring, and risk assessment. Amina has had the
privilege of collaborating with state and local agencies, private sector clients, and civil engineering firms, and has previously worked with several state agencies
(e.g., NMDOT, FDOT, and TxDOT) on pavement and
geotechnical projects. Her unique proficiency in both
pavement and geotechnical engineering enables her to
provide her clients with high-quality, cost-effective, and reliable solutions.
• Advanced Non-Destructive Testing: Proficiency in
utilizing non-destructive testing methodologies such
as Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD), Ground
Penetrating Radar (GPR), Laser Crack Measurement
System (LCMS), and Profiler, for comprehensive
pavement condition assessments.
• Pavement Evaluation and Design: Demonstrated
expertise in employing various design methos,
including Caltrans, Greenbook, AASHTO’93, FAA,
AASHTOWare Pavement ME for the evaluation and
design of pavements.
• Pavement Management Plans (PMP): Experience in
formulating PMP using the Pavement Condition Index
(PCI), budget analysis and Maintenance and
Rehabilitation (M&R) planning using PAVER.
• Asphalt Mix Designs: Proficiency in designing
asphalt mixes, encompassing hot-mix asphalt (HMA)
and warm-mix asphalt (WMA) with and without RAP,
in accordance with Superpave mix design method.
• Geotechnical Data and Design
Recommendations: Expertise in providing
geotechnical data and design recommendations for
utilities, retaining walls, and bridges based on the insitu lab testing of soil and rock. • AC Laboratory Testing: Experience in laboratory
testing, including Dynamic Modulus Test, LowTemperature Cracking Test, Beam Fatigue Test, Hamburg Wheel Tracking (HWT) Test, Moisture
Induced Sensitivity Test (MIST), and more.
• Asphalt Binder Testing: Experience in binder
testing, including Dynamic Shear Rheometer (DSR),
Dynamic Mechanical Analyzer (DMA), Bending Beam
Rheometers (BBR), Rotational Viscometer (RV), etc.

Page 802 of 989 ends

Amina Mannan 2
Select Pavement Management Plan (PMP) Projects
City of Newport Beach, Citywide Pavement Management Plan Updates for 2023, 2025:

Managed the on-going, citywide pavement management plan study consisting of 205 centerline miles of streets to comply with OCTA Measure M2 funding requirements.

City of Laguna Niguel, CA, Citywide Pavement Management Plan Updates, 2020 to 2026:

Pavement condition index (PCI) assessment of all city-maintained streets consisting of a total of approximately 141.5 centerline miles of streets and budget scenario analysis to help optimize the City’s pavement maintenance and rehabilitation schedule and budget (approximately $2.1M per year typically).

City of Aliso Viejo CA, Citywide Pavement Management Plan Updates, 2025 to 2028:

Pavement condition index (PCI) assessment of all city-maintained streets consisting of a total of approximately 72.2 centerline miles of streets and budget scenario analysis to help optimize the City’s pavement maintenance and rehabilitation schedule and budget (approximately $1.75M per year typically).

City of San Fernando, 2024 Citywide Pavement Management Plan Update: Managed the City’s pavement management plan study consisting of 50 centerline miles of streets to comply with Los Angeles County Transportation Authority (METRO) pavement management requirements.

City of Hermosa Beach, 2024 Citywide Pavement Management Plan Update: Managed the City’s pavement management plan study consisting of 48 centerline miles of streets to comply with Los Angeles County Transportation Authority (METRO) pavement management requirements.

Groves at Orchard Hills Homeowners Association, Pavement Management Plan Update 2024, Irvine, CA: Updated the pavement management inventory and performed pavement management plan updates in 2024.

Casta Del Sol Community Association, Pavement Management Plan Update 2024, Mission Viejo, CA: Updated the pavement management system for approximately 22 centerline miles of streets managed by the HOA with a yearly street improvement budget of approximately $1.2M to $2.2M per year. Performing periodic reviews and updates to the community’s pavement management plan each year.

Canyon Lake Property Owners Association, Pavement Management Plan Update 2024, Canyon Lake, CA: Updated the pavement management system for approximately 37 centerline miles of streets managed by the HOA with a yearly street improvement budget of approximately $3M per year.

Oasis Palm Desert Homeowners Association Pavement Management Plan, 2023, Palm Desert, CA: Creating the HOA’s street network inventory, performing walking pavement condition assessment of the HOA streets, reviewing previous Maintenance and Rehabilitation (M&R) activities, performing various budget scenarios analysis, and recommending Maintenance and Rehabilitation (M&R) treatments for the next 5 years.

Page 803 of 989 ends

Amina Mannan 3
Select Pavement Evaluation and Design Projects – Local Municipalities and Agencies Western Avenue and Carie Lane Pavement Evaluation Project, City of Stanton, CA, 2025- 2026: Pavement design engineer responsible for pavement condition evaluation, corings, lab testing, and rehabilitation recommendations. Western Avenue (TI up to 10.5) was found to have less than half the required structural capacity due to heavy truck traffic. Two alternatives were developed: (1) edge‑mill and ARHM overlay with fiber‑reinforced AC leveling and localized full‑depth repairs, and (2) full‑depth reclamation with cement treatment (FDR‑C).

San Miguel Drive Pavement Evaluation Project (San Joaquin Hills Road to Ford Road), City of Newport Beach, CA, 2025: Pavement design engineer overseeing evaluation of ~7,750 LF of San Miguel Drive, including review of as‑built plans, pavement condition assessment, FWD testing, corings, lab testing, and identification of localized AC repair areas. Findings showed that reduced AC thickness from prior improvements is contributing to current structural inadequacy, most notably the outside (Lane 2) travel lanes. Recommended rehabilitation consisted of a edge mill‑and‑overlay using ARHM‑GG‑C with localized 6.5‑inch full‑depth AC patches.

Bristol Street North and Spy Glass Hill Road Pavement Evaluation Projects, City of Newport Beach, CA, 2024-2025: Pavement design engineer overseeing evaluation of ~4,000 LF of Bristol Street North and ~6,000 LF of Spy Glass Hill Road, including pavement condition assessment, FWD testing, corings, lab testing, and rehabilitation recommendations.

Recommended mill‑and‑overlay with ARHM‑GG‑C and localized full‑depth AC patches for both segments, with a leveling course specified for Bristol Street North to mitigate delamination risk.

Harbor Boulevard from Lincoln Avenue to North Street, Pavement Evaluation Project, City of Anaheim, CA, July 2024: Pavement design engineer overseeing the evaluation of the segments located in the City of Anaheim, including pavement surface condition assessment, corings, laboratory testing, analysis, and development of pavement rehabilitation recommendations.

Brookhurst Street from Ball Road to La Palma Avenue, Pavement Evaluation Project, City of Anaheim, CA, September 2024: Pavement design engineer overseeing the evaluation of the segments located in the City of Anaheim, including pavement surface condition assessment, corings, laboratory testing, analysis, and development of pavement rehabilitation recommendations.
2020 “Phase II” Citywide Pavement Evaluation Project, City of Aliso Viejo, CA, ongoing:

Pavement design engineer overseeing pavement condition assessments, corings, laboratory testing, analysis, and pavement repair recommendations of arterial and residential street segments.

Aliso Viejo Prakway Pavement Evaluation Project (Enterprise to Aliso Creek), City of Aliso Viejo, CA, 2025: Pavement design engineer overseeing the evaluation of Aliso Viejo Parkway, including pavement condition assessment, FWD testing, corings, laboratory testing, and development of pavement improvement recommendations. The evaluation included identification of structural weaknesses along the corridor. Recommended rehabilitation consisted of a mill‑and‑overlay with localized full‑depth AC repairs.

Annual Residential Resurfacing FY 2024-25 & 2025-26 Project, City of Dana Point, CA, ongoing: Pavement design engineer performing and overseeing the pavement evaluation of various residential streets, including corings, ground-penetrating radar (GPR) testing, Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) testing, laboratory testing, and analysis.

Page 804 of 989 ends

Amina Mannan 4
Crenshaw Boulevard Rehabilitation Project, City of Torrance, CA, April 2019: Performed pavement evaluation to develop pavement rehabilitation repair recommendations.

Crenshaw Boulevard Between 79th Street and I-105 Freeway, City of Inglewood, CA, January 2024: Performing and analyzing ground-penetrating radar (GPR) testing to identify approximate limits of buried underlying PCC.

Seal Beach Boulevard from Westminster Boulevard to N Gate Road, City of Seal Beach, CA, March 2024: Performed pavement evaluation to develop rehabilitation repair recommendations for Seal Beach Boulevard.

Access Trail Evaluation and Pavement Design, City of Anaheim, CA, April 2024: Pavement design engineer overseeing the field exploration, laboratory testing, analysis, and development of pavement design recommendations.

Select Quality Assurance Testing and Observation Projects Glenwood Road Pavement Rehabilitation Project, City of Aliso Viejo, CA, 2025: Quality assurance observation and testing services for the mill-and-overlay rehabilitation of Glenwood Road. GMU provided materials testing of asphalt concrete, concrete, and subgrade compaction, to support the project.
2025 Residential Streets Improvements Project, (CP-1446000) (CP-1303000), City of Garden Grove, CA, 2025: Oversaw quality assurance observation and testing services for this residential streets improvement project. GMU provided materials testing of asphalt concrete, subgrade compaction, slurry, and concrete materials to support the project.

Harbor Blvd and Garden Grove Blvd Intersection Improvement Project (CP-1303000), City of Garden Grove, CA, 2025-2026: Oversaw quality assurance observation and testing services for this intersection improvement project. Improvements consisted of roadway widening, construction of new turn lanes, asphalt concrete and aggregate base paving, concrete curb and gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, catch basins, storm drain piping, and traffic signal installation. GMU provided materials testing of asphalt concrete, aggregate base, subgrade compaction, and concrete materials to support the project.

Annual Residential Roadway Repair, Overlay, and Slurry Seal Projects, City of Mission Viejo, CA, 2024 to Present: Oversight and management of quality assurance observation and testing services for the City's annual residential roadway repair, overlay, and slurry seal projects.

Improvements generally consisted of localized AC patch repairs and AC overlay of arterial and residential streets, and annual slurry seal applications.

Phase 3 Annual Street Resurfacing Project, City of San Fernando, CA, 2024: Construction management (CM) and quality assurance (QA) testing services. 2024 Asphalt Repairs and Asphalt Overlays of Various Streets, City of Mission Viejo, CA, Ongoing: Quality control and asphalt concrete observation and testing.

Cityside Fiber Micro-Trench Asphalt Restoration, City of Mission Viejo, CA, Ongoing:

Quality control, field density testing, and asphalt concrete observation and testing.

Page 805 of 989 ends

Amina Mannan 5
Select Homeowner Association Pavement Projects
Oasis Palm Desert Homeowners Association Pavement Evaluation Project, March-June 2024
Pavement design engineer performing and overseeing the pavement evaluation including corings, Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) testing, laboratory testing, and analysis.

Caritas Corp. Pavement Evaluation Project, May-July 2024 Pavement design engineer performing and overseeing the pavement evaluation of three sites located in Brea and Vista, SC, including pavement condition index (PCI) surveys, corings, laboratory testing, and analysis. Provided 15-year plan of the recommended future pavement maintenance/rehabilitation for each site.

Connemara by the Sea Homeowners Association, San Juan Capistrano, CA, Pavement Evaluation Project, June-August 2024: Performed pavement condition index (PCI) surveys, corings, laboratory testing, and analysis. Provided 5-year plan of the recommended future pavement maintenance/rehabilitation.

Ocean Ranch Homeowners Association 2024 Pavement Improvement, Laguna Niguel, CA:

Providing pavement maintenance/repair budget advisory, maintenance/repair design, and Prepared plan/specs for 2024 pavement project.

Shady Canyon Homeowners Association 2024 Pavement Improvement, Irvine, CA:

Providing pavement maintenance/repair budget advisory, maintenance/repair design, and construction support services for 2024 pavement project.

Casta Del Sol Community Association, 2024 Pavement Improvement, Mission Viejo, CA:

Providing pavement maintenance/repair budget advisory, maintenance/repair design, and Prepared plan/specs for 2024 pavement project.

Lake Forest II Master Homeowners Association, 2024 Pavement Improvement, Lake Forest, CA: Providing pavement maintenance/repair budget advisory, maintenance/repair design, and prepared plan/specs for 2024 pavement project.

Page 806 of 989 ends

30336 Esperanza, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688 | ph: 949.888.6513 | fax: 949.888.1380 | web: www.gmugeo.com BRYAN E. RODRIGUEZ, PG, CEG
Project Engineering Geologist

PROFESSION
Engineering Geologist

REGISTRATIONS
Certified Engineering Geologist,
State of California
Professional Geologist,
State of California

EDUCATION
B.A., Geology
(Minor: Chemistry)
California State Polytechnic
University, Humboldt | 2014

AFFILIATIONS
South Coast Geological Society
Bryan Rodriguez is a Project Engineering Geologist with 8 years of experience in the geotechnical industry. He has developed a broad and versatile background working on
projects across both the private and public sectors in
Southern California. His portfolio spans residential and commercial developments, custom lots, ADUs, HOA
communities, bluff erosion studies, landslide and slope stability investigations, fault studies, major roadway
infrastructure, and utility projects.

In addition to his design and development work, Bryan
has extensive expertise in forensic investigations,
evaluating structural distress in commercial buildings and residential homes. He has contributed to several highprofile landslide projects in Orange, Los Angeles, and San Bernardino Counties, with responsibilities including geologic mapping, downhole and continuous core
logging, and geophysical data interpretation. Bryan also has strong experience in project management, proposal
preparation, report writing, field crew supervision, and maintaining professional relationships with clients and contractors.

Selected project categories representative of Mr.

Rodriguez's experience are described below:
• Landslide / Slope Failure Investigation and Repair
• Fault Studies and Seismic Hazard Investigations
• Public Works and Infrastructure Projects
• Residential and Commercial Development
• HOA Geotechnical and Pavement Consulting
• Forensic / Structural Distress Investigations
• Water Infrastructure and Reservoir Projects
• Construction Management and Oversight
• Environmental Site Assessments
Additional information and representative projects from Bryan's portfolio are summarized on the following pages.

Page 807 of 989 ends

Bryan E. Rodriguez 2

TECHNICAL EXPERTISE
• Geologic Field Mapping
• Downhole and Continuous Core Logging
• Hollow Stem Auger and Mud Rotary Drilling
• Large-Diameter Bucket Auger Borings
• Rock Core Logging
• Test Pit Excavation and Logging
• Well Permeameter / Infiltration Testing
• Nuclear Density Gauge and Sand-Cone
Testing
• Pavement Coring and Condition
Assessment
• Fault Trench Logging and Seismic Hazard
Investigations
• Geotechnical Instrumentation
(Inclinometers)
• Geophysical Data Interpretation
• Aerial Photography Analysis
• Forensic / Structural Distress Evaluations
• Construction Monitoring and Quality
Assurance
• Geotechnical Cross Section Drafting
• Report and Proposal Preparation

REPRESENTATIVE PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Trabuco Canyon Water District — On-Call Project Management | TCWD, Trabuco Canyon, CA (Current)
Project management for various on-call tasks including pavement design, construction observations and testing, and welding inspection for the District's ongoing maintenance program.

Huntington Beach Dog Park — Geotechnical Monitoring | City of Huntington Beach, CA (2026)
Project management for geological monitoring during slope failure remediation. Included observation of keyway excavation, geogrid placement, subdrain installation, and fill placement and compaction.

Forster Ranch HOA — Slope Failure Evaluation and Observation | San Clemente, CA (2026)
Provided remedial recommendations for a community slope failure and managed construction observation and testing during the remediation phase.

Rancho San Joaquin HOA — Pavement Evaluation | Irvine, CA (2026) Managed pavement evaluation and remedial recommendations for failing subgrade. Investigation included asphalt coring, subgrade sampling, and laboratory testing to characterize subsurface conditions.

Lake Mission Viejo Association — Water Improvement Project | Mission Viejo, CA (Current)
Managed geotechnical investigation for a proposed pump station, prepared the geotechnical report and design recommendations, and currently manages the construction phase providing geotechnical observation and testing services.

Santa Lucia HOA — Slope and Retaining Wall Evaluation | Newport Coast, CA (2026) Conducted slope stability and retaining wall evaluation at two areas of reported distress within the community, including site reconnaissance, document review, and written findings.

RMV Planning Area 3.14 — Debris Basin Subsurface Investigation | Rancho Mission Viejo, CA (Current)
Conducted subsurface investigation using an excavator to document the extent of old pond deposits at the site of a future debris basin; findings were used to quantify export quantities during grading.

Page 808 of 989 ends

Bryan E. Rodriguez 3
Prima Deschecha Landfill, Landslide C — Geotechnical Investigation | OC Waste & Recycling, San Juan Capistrano, CA (2025)
Conducted subsurface investigation to determine limits of Landslide C, including coordination and logging of thirteen continuous borings and subsequent downhole geophysical surveys.

Shady View Residential Development — Geological Monitoring | Trumark Homes, Chino Hills, CA (2025)
Assisted in geological monitoring during rough grading of the approximately 72-acre residential development. Work included monitoring of cut slopes and landslide areas, active fault zones, settlement monitor installation, and evaluation of import sites for MSE-wall backfill materials.

East San Fernando Valley Light Rail Transit Project | LA Metro / AECOM, Panorama City, CA (2024)
Provided subsurface investigation drilling along Van Nuys Boulevard for a proposed light rail transit project in support of design-level geotechnical evaluation.

Palm Innovation Academy — Fault Investigation | BUSD, Beaumont, CA (2024) Assisted in fault trench mapping at the school site to support construction of a new building structure. The approximately 150-foot-long, 15-foot-deep trench revealed buried floodplain strata with no evidence of Quaternary faulting.

Chevron Coyote Hills — Geotechnical Investigation | Fullerton, CA Managed field activities for 37 large-diameter bucket auger borings (to 131 ft bgs), 26 hollowstem auger borings, and 19 test pits in support of grading plan review for a proposed development.

Drafted and analyzed geotechnical cross sections and prepared the project report.

In-N-Out Headquarters — Infiltration Testing | In-N-Out, Inc., Baldwin Park, CA (2025) Provided preliminary infiltration testing for a proposed new In-N-Out Burger headquarters development project to support stormwater and foundation design.

Industry Business Center — Geological Monitoring | City of Industry, CA Assisted in geological monitoring during rough grading of the approximately 595-acre Industry Business Center. Work included monitoring of cut slopes and potential landslide areas, subdrain installation, downhole logging, fault trench logging, test pit logging, and inclinometer monitoring.

Distribution Facility — Geotechnical Engineering | Sun Valley, CA Provided observation for 1,544 DeWaal displacement pile installations for two distribution buildings constructed over a reclaimed gravel pit. Monitored daily progress, installation methods, and confirmed depth to alluvial soil for each pile. Coordinated real-time field telemetry for accurate daily reporting.

Suburban Water Systems Plant 408 Reservoir Replacement | La Mirada, CA Provided geotechnical observation and materials testing during construction of two approximately 2-million-gallon capacity potable water steel tanks, including remedial subgrade recompaction and nuclear density testing.

Apple Valley Ranchos Water Company Well 35 | Apple Valley, CA Assisted in subsurface exploration and geotechnical evaluation for a new pump house and generator pad. Field activities included drilling and logging four hollow-stem auger borings and conducting two in-situ ground resistivity geophysical surveys.

Golden State Water Company Happy Trails Reservoir | Apple Valley, CA Assisted in subsurface exploration for a new 0.3-million-gallon water tank reservoir. Field activities included geologic mapping, excavation, logging, and sampling of seven test pits.

Page 809 of 989 ends

Bryan E. Rodriguez 4
Valley County Water District — Geotechnical Investigation | Baldwin Park, CA Assisted in subsurface exploration for a new District headquarters campus. Field activities included excavating and logging seven test pits, conducting infiltration testing, and performing nuclear density testing of in-situ soil conditions.

Forensic Structural Distress Evaluations — Various Homeowners | AAA Insurance, Various Cities, CA (Current)
Provides on-call forensic evaluations for AAA homeowners insurance claims, including retaining wall failures, foundation distress, and flooding assessments.

Page 810 of 989 ends

30336 Esperanza, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688 | ph: 949.888.6513 | fax: 949.888.1380 | web: www.gmugeo.com

JADE SILL
Senior Engineering Technician

PROFESSION
Engineering Technician

EDUCATION
B.A Geography-Environmental
Analysis
California State University of
Fullerton (CSUF)

CERTIFICATIONS
ACI Level 1 Concrete Technician
CPN Certified for Nuclear Gauge
Operation
ICC Registered Special Inspector –
Reinforced Concrete
City of Irvine Deputy Inspector –
Reinforced Concrete & Asphalt
County of Orange Deputy Inspector –
Reinforced Concrete
City of Newport Beach Deputy
Inspector – Reinforced Concrete
Mr. Sill has 24 years of experience providing field
engineering, construction observation, public works
inspection support, and materials testing services for
municipal and infrastructure projects throughout
Southern California. His experience includes
inspection and documentation of public improvements,
grading activities, utility installations, roadway
construction, pavement rehabilitation, and construction materials compliance.

Mr. Sill routinely supports Public Works and Grading
Departments through field coordination, contractor
interface, verification of conformance with approved
plans and specifications, preparation of field
documentation, and observation/testing of earthwork,
asphalt paving, and reinforced concrete construction
activities. He has recent direct experience supporting
municipal inspection assignments for the Cities of Dana Point and Laguna Niguel.

Mr. Sill’s technical strengths include pavement
observation and testing, grading inspection support,
reinforced concrete inspection, construction materials
testing, and coordination between contractors, project
managers, and agency staff during active construction.

Relevant Public Works Inspection Experience
• Public Works Inspection support for municipal
infrastructure improvements, roadway rehabilitation,
utility installations, encroachment permit work, and
capital improvement projects
• Daily field observation and coordination with
contractors, agency staff, and project management
teams
• Verification of contractor conformance with approved
plans, specifications, and applicable standards
• Documentation of field activities, testing results,
corrective actions, and project progress
• Grading inspection and construction observation for
public and private development projects
• Observation and testing of earthwork, aggregate base, asphalt paving, reinforced concrete, trench backfill, and utility improvements

Page 811 of 989 ends

Jade Sill 2

SELECT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Deputy Grading Inspector, City of Laguna Niguel (2023–Present) Provides grading inspection and construction observation services for public and private development projects, including field coordination, earthwork observation, contractor communication, documentation of field conditions, and verification of compliance with approved grading plans and geotechnical recommendations.

Deputy Public Works Inspector, City of Dana Point (2024–Present) Provides public works inspection services supporting municipal capital improvement and maintenance projects, including field observation of construction activities, coordination with contractors and City staff, verification of compliance with approved plans and specifications, documentation of field activities, and observation/testing of pavement, utility, and civil improvements.

Upgrade Coastal Junction (C-10) Valve Replacement Project, SCWD, Irvine, CA: As Senior Engineering Technician for this project, my responsibilities included: Soil backfill observation/testing and special inspection for new flow meters, flow control valves, isolation valves, pipelines, and new reinforced concrete vault and lid.

Joint Transmission Main (JTM) J2R4 Manway Installation and Vault, SCWD, Aliso Viejo, CA (2019): As Senior Engineering Technician for this project, my responsibilities included: Backfill observation/testing and reinforced concrete inspection/testing.

JTM Vaults 1, 2 and 4 Upgrade Project, SCWD, Laguna Woods, CA (2019): As Senior Engineering Technician for this project, my responsibilities included. Soil observation/testing and reinforced concrete inspection/testing.

JRWSS Water Valve Replacement Project, Victoria Blvd., Doheny Park Rd. and Costco Access Rd., SCWD, Capistrano Beach, CA (2016): As Senior Engineering Technician for this project, my responsibilities included: Waterline trench backfill observation and soil/asphalt observation/testing.

Ritz Cove Lift Station No. 6 Reclaimed Waterline Project, SCWD, Monarch Beach, CA (2016): As Senior Engineering Technician for this project, my responsibilities included: Waterline trench backfill observation/testing.

Phases 1 and 2 Dana Point Town Center Infrastructure Improvements, SCWD, Dana Point, CA (2014 - 2015): As Senior Engineering Technician for this project, my responsibilities included: Pipeline installation observation, trench backfill observation/testing for domestic and reclaimed water lines, sewer lines, fire lines, as well as, concrete subgrade, and asphalt subgrade and asphalt paving observation/testing.

Voyager Water and Sewer Line Improvements, MNWD, Laguna Niguel, CA (2022): As Senior Engineering Technician for this project, my responsibilities include: Pipeline installation observation, trench backfill observation, and soil/asphalt observation/testing.

Bradt Reservoir Paving, Phase 2, SCWD, San Clemente, CA: (2019) As Senior Engineering Technician for this project, my responsibilities included: Asphalt dig out repairs and asphalt testing.

Valve replacement at Stonehill/Del Obispo, SCWD, Dana Point, CA: (2022) As Senior Engineering Technician for this project, my responsibilities include: Trench backfill observation and soil and asphalt testing.

Emergency Repair of Los Monteros Recycled Water Line, SCWD, Monarch Beach, CA: (2020). As Senior Engineering Technician for this project, my responsibilities included: Trench backfill observation and soil and asphalt testing.

Page 812 of 989 ends

Appendix B
Required Forms

Page 813 of 989 ends
Page 814 of 989 ends
Page 815 of 989 ends
Page 816 of 989 ends
Page 817 of 989 ends
Page 818 of 989 ends
Page 819 of 989 ends
Page 820 of 989 ends
Page 821 of 989 ends
Page 822 of 989 ends
Page 823 of 989 ends

2026 SCHEDULE OF CHARGES

CITY OF LAGUNA HILLS PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING SERVICES

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Document Preparation and Project Services $ 112.00/hour CAD/GIS Design Engineer $ 135.00/hour
Staff Engineer or Geologist $ 180.00/hour
Senior Staff Engineer or Geologist $ 197.00/hour
Project Engineer or Geologist $ 220.00/hour
Senior Engineer or Geologist $ 260.00/hour
Associate Engineer or Geologist $ 280.00/hour
Principal/Director $ 295.00/hour

FIELD INSPECTION & TESTING SERVICES
Staff Engineering Technician $ 115.00/hour*
• Services provided under direct supervision of a Senior Engineering Technician Senior Engineering Technician $ 132.00/hour*
• Inspections for soils/grading, asphalt, concrete, batch plants, piles/caissons, etc. • Certifications by ACI, ICC, Caltrans, local jurisdictions, etc.

Registered Special Inspector (No 4-hour minimum) $ 132.00/hour* • Certifications by ACI, ICC, Caltrans, local jurisdictions, etc. • Reinforced concrete, Post-Tension, Masonry, Welding, Bolting, Fireproofing Instrumentation Engineer $ 180.00/hour
• Slope inclinometer and Piezometer monitoring
• Manometer for floor-level surveys
• Stormwater turbidity & pH meter
• Groundwater monitoring - pressure transducer, datalogger, water chemistry meter, etc. • Pipeline video camera for drains, wells, etc.

Engineering Seismological Technician (includes 3-channel seismograph) $ 180.00/hour • Blast vibration monitoring
• Construction vibration & noise monitoring (pile driving, drilling, demolition, etc.) *Notes:
(1) Rates include vehicle, nuclear density gauge, and equipment for testing, inspection, and sampling. (2) No 4-hour minimum charges apply, except for night work. (3) Overtime is charged at 1.5 times the base rate. Overtime is defined as time worked on the project in excess of 8 hours per day and all time on Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays. (4) Prevailing Wage projects, additional hourly surcharge for Field Personnel per CA Labor Code §1720, et seq. Add $ 43.00/hour

LABORATORY TESTING SERVICES
Laboratory Testing $ 145.00/hour
(For special materials testing and laboratory costs on a per-test basis, see GMU’s Laboratory Fee Schedule)

OTHER CHARGES
Outside Services Cost + 15%
Reimbursables & Reprographics Cost

Page 824 of 989 ends

05/2026 – Reformatted JJA
13 Exhibit “B” InsuranceSpecifications

Page 825 of 989 ends

05/2026 – Reformatted JJA
14 EXHIBIT “B” INSURANCE SPECIFICATIONS
Without limiting CONSULTANT’s indemnification of CITY, and prior to performing any work under this AGREEMENT or receiving any compensation, CONSULTANT shall obtain, provide and maintain at its own expense during the term of this AGREEMENT, policies of insurance of the type and amounts described below and in a form that is satisfactory to CITY.

General liability insurance. CONSULTANT shall maintain commercial general liability insurance with coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CG 00 01, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate, for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage. The policy must include contractual liability that has not been amended. Any endorsement restricting standard ISO “insured contract” language will not be accepted. The policy shall name the City of Laguna Hills, and its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers as additional insureds.

Umbrella or excess liability insurance. [If required to meet higher limits].

Umbrella liability insurance requirements. CONSULTANT shall obtain and maintain an umbrella liability insurance policy that offers comprehensive coverage. This policy must include coverage for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage, and it should extend to encompass commercial general liability, automobile liability, and employer’s liability. The policy must incorporate the following terms and conditions:
• Drop-down feature. This feature activates if any primary insurance becomes partially or wholly uncollectible for any reason, excluding the bankruptcy or insolvency of the primary insurer.
• Claims handling. Coverage must be administered on a “pay on behalf of” basis, as opposed to reimbursement model, to ensure direct payment of claims by the insurer. • Concurrency of coverage. The policy effective dates must align with those of the underlying primary insurance policies to ensure continuous coverage.

Excess liability insurance requirements. The CONSULTANT shall obtain and maintain an excess liability insurance policy. This policy must be structured to provide additional coverage over the CONSULTANT’s existing commercial general liability, automobile liability, and employer’s liability policies. The requirements for the policy are as follows:
• Follow-form coverage. The policy adheres strictly to the terms and conditions of the underlying policies, ensuring seamless integration of coverage. • Drop-down provision. This provision states that the excess policy will respond as primary coverage in the event that the underlying insurer is unable to pay a claim due to insolvency, unless an insolvency exclusion specifically applies. • Claims handling. Coverage must be administered on a “pay on behalf of” basis, as opposed to a reimbursement model, to ensure direct payment of claims by the insurer.
• Concurrency of coverage. The policy effective dates must align with those of the underlying policies to prevent any gaps in coverage.

Automobile liability insurance. CONSULTANT shall maintain automobile insurance at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CA 00 01 covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of CONSULTANT arising out of or in connection with the work to be performed under this AGREEMENT, including coverage for any owned, hired, non-owned, or rented vehicles, in an amount not less than$1,000,000.00 combined single limit for each accident.

Page 826 of 989 ends

05/2026 – Reformatted JJA
15 Workers’ compensation insurance. CONSULTANT shall maintain Workers’ Compensation Insurance (Statutory Limits) and Employer’s Liability Insurance (with limits of at least $1,000,000 dollars). CONSULTANT shall submit to CITY, along with the certificate of insurance, a Waiver of Subrogation endorsement in favor of CITY, its officers, agents, employees, and volunteers.

Professional liability (errors & omissions) insurance. CONSULTANT shall maintain professional liability insurance that covers the services to be performed in connection with this AGREEMENT, in the minimum amount of $1,000,000 per claim and in the aggregate. Any policy inception date, continuity date, or retroactive date must be before the effective date of this AGREEMENT and CONSULTANT agrees to maintain continuous coverage through a period of no less than three years after completion of the services required by this AGREEMENT.

Other provisions or requirements:

Proof of insurance. CONSULTANT shall provide certificates of insurance and required endorsements to CITY as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein. Insurance certificates and endorsements must be approved by CITY prior to commencement of performance. Current certification of insurance shall be kept on file with CITY for the contract period and any additional length of time required thereafter. CITY reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time.

Duration of coverage. CONSULTANT shall procure and maintain for the contract period and any additional length of time required thereafter, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property, or financial loss, which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by CONSULTANT, their agents, representatives, employees, or subconsultants/ subcontractors. If this AGREEMENT involves construction, CONSULTANT must maintain general liability and umbrella or excess liability insurance for as long as there is a statutory exposure to completed operations claims. CITY and its officers, officials, employees, and agents shall continue as additional insureds under such policies.

Primary/noncontributing. Coverage provided by CONSULTANT shall be primary and any insurance or self-insurance procured or maintained by CITY shall not be required to contribute with it. The limits of insurance required herein may be satisfied by a combination of primary and umbrella or excess insurance. Any umbrella or excess insurance shall contain or be endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and non-contributory basis for the benefit of CITY before the CITY’s own insurance or self-insurance shall be called upon to protect it as a named insured.

CITY’s rights of enforcement. In the event any policy of insurance required under this AGREEMENT does not comply with these specifications or is canceled and not replaced, CITY has the right but not the duty to obtain the insurance it deems necessary and any premium paid by CITY will be promptly reimbursed by CONSULTANT or CITY will withhold amounts sufficient to pay premium from CONSULTANT’s payments. In the alternative, CITY may cancel this AGREEMENT.

Acceptable insurers. All insurance policies shall be issued by an insurance company currently authorized by the Insurance Commissioner to transact business of insurance in the State of California, with an assigned policyholders’ Rating of A- (or higher) and Financial Size Category Class VII (or larger) in accordance with the latest edition of Best’s Key Rating Guide, unless otherwise approved by CITY.

Waiver of subrogation. With the exception of Professional Liability, all insurance coverage maintained or procured pursuant to this AGREEMENT shall be endorsed to waive subrogation

Page 827 of 989 ends

05/2026 – Reformatted JJA
16 against CITY, its elected or appointed officers, agents, officials, employees, and volunteers or shall specifically allow CONSULTANT or others providing insurance evidence in compliance with these specifications to waive their right of recovery prior to a loss. CONSULTANT hereby waives its own right of recovery against CITY and shall require similar written express waivers and insurance clauses from each of its subconsultants/subcontractors.

Enforcement of contract provisions (non estoppel). CONSULTANT acknowledges and agrees that any actual or alleged failure on the part of CITY to inform CONSULTANT of noncompliance with any requirement imposes no additional obligations on the CITY nor does it waive any rights hereunder.

Requirements not limiting. Requirements of specific coverage features or limits contained in this Section are not intended as a limitation on coverage, limits on other requirements, or a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any insurance. Specific reference to a given coverage feature is for purposes of clarification only as it pertains to a given issue and is not intended by any party or insured to be all inclusive, or to the exclusion of other coverage, or a waiver of any type. If the CONSULTANT maintains higher limits than the minimums shown above, the CITY requires and shall be entitled to coverage for the higher limits maintained by the CONSULTANT.

Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the CITY.

Notice of cancellation. CONSULTANT agrees to oblige its insurance agent or broker and insurers to provide to CITY with a thirty (30) day notice of cancellation (except for nonpayment for which a ten (10) day notice is required) or nonrenewal of coverage for each required coverage. If any of the CONSULTANT’s insurers are unwilling to provide such notice, then Consultant shall have the responsibility of notifying the CITY immediately in the event of CONSULTANT’s failure to renew any of the required insurance coverages, or insurer’s cancellation or non-renewal.

Additional insured status. General liability, automobile liability, and umbrella/excess liability insurance policies shall provide or be endorsed to provide that CITY and its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers shall be additional insureds under such policies.

Prohibition of undisclosed coverage limitations. None of the coverages required herein will be in compliance with these requirements if they include any limiting endorsement of any kind that has not been first submitted to CITY and approved of in writing.

Separation of insureds. A severability of interests provision must apply for all additional insureds ensuring that Consultant’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the insurer’s limits of liability. The policy(ies) shall not contain any cross-liability exclusions.

Pass through clause. CONSULTANT agrees to ensure that its subconsultants, subcontractors, and any other party who is brought onto or involved in the project/service by CONSULTANT (hereinafter collectively “subcontractor”), provide the same minimum insurance coverage and endorsements required of CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT agrees to monitor and review all such coverage and assumes all responsibility for ensuring that such coverage is provided in conformity with the requirements of this section. However, in the event CONSULTANT’s subcontractor cannot comply with this requirement, which proof must be submitted to the CITY, CONSULTANT shall be required to ensure that its subcontractor provide and maintain insurance coverage and endorsements sufficient to the specific risk of exposure involved with subcontractor’s scope of work and services, with limits less than required of the CONSULTANT, but in all other terms consistent with the CONSULTANT’s requirements under this agreement. This provision does not relieve the CONSULTANT of its contractual obligations under the agreement and/or limit its

Page 828 of 989 ends

05/2026 – Reformatted JJA
17 liability to the amount of insurance coverage provided by its subcontractors. This provision is intended solely to provide CONSULTANT with the ability to utilize a subcontractor who may be otherwise qualified to perform the work or services but may not carry the same insurance limits as required of the CONSULTANT under this agreement given the limited scope of work or services provided by the subcontractor. CONSULTANT agrees that upon request, all agreements with subcontractors, and others engaged in the project, will be submitted to CITY for review.

City’s right to revise specifications. CITY reserves the right at any time during the term of the AGREEMENT to change the amounts and types of insurance required by giving CONSULTANT ninety (90) days advance written notice of such change. If such change results in substantial additional cost to CONSULTANT, CITY and CONSULTANT may renegotiate CONSULTANT’s compensation.

Self-insured retentions. Any self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by CITY.

CITY reserves the right to require that self-insured retentions be eliminated, lowered, or replaced by a deductible, or require proof of ability to pay losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses within the retention through confirmation from the underwriter. Self-insurance will not be considered to comply with these specifications unless approved by CITY.

Timely notice of claims. CONSULTANT shall give CITY prompt and timely notice of claims made or suits instituted that arise out of or result from CONSULTANT’s performance under this AGREEMENT, and that involve or may involve coverage under any of the required liability policies.

Additional insurance. CONSULTANT shall also procure and maintain, at its own cost and expense, any additional kinds of insurance, which in its own judgment may be necessary for its proper protection and prosecution of the work.

Page 829 of 989 ends

05/2026 – Reformatted JJA
1 AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES
CON –
RKA Consulting Group, Inc.

On-Call Public Works/Engineering Consulting and Support Services This AGREEMENT is made and effective as of the EFFECTIVE DATE, by and between the City of Laguna Hills, a municipal corporation ("CITY") and RKA Consulting Group, Inc. ("CONSULTANT"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:

1. TERM
This AGREEMENT shall commence on July 14, 2026, (“EFFECTIVE DATE”) and remain and continue in effect until all tasks described herein are completed but in no event later than August 31, 2029, unless sooner terminated or extended pursuant to the provisions of this AGREEMENT. Notwithstanding this limit on term, some duties and obligations may survive the termination, lapse, or completion of this AGREEMENT.

2. SERVICES
CONSULTANT shall perform the tasks described and set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. CONSULTANT shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit A.

3. NOTICE TO PROCEED
CONSULTANT shall not perform any work or be entitled to any compensation under this AGREEMENT until a written Notice to Proceed is issued by CITY. The Notice to Proceed shall not issue unless and until CONSULTANT submits proof, satisfactory to CITY, of its procurement of appropriate insurance required by this AGREEMENT. The failure of CONSULTANT to submit proof of appropriate insurance within 10 days of the EFFECTIVE DATE is a material breach and shall constitute cause for immediate termination of this AGREEMENT by CITY.

4. PERFORMANCE
CONSULTANT shall at all times faithfully, competently, and to the best of their ability, experience, and talent perform all tasks described herein. CONSULTANT shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of CONSULTANT hereunder in meeting its obligations under this AGREEMENT.

5. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE
Time is of the essence and in the performance of this AGREEMENT. CONSULTANT shall diligently and continuously perform the work in accordance with the agreed in Exhibit A.

CONSULTANT shall not be liable for delays due to causes beyond its control provided that CONSULTANT gives City written notice within ten (10) days after CONSULTANT becomes aware of the event, and uses reasonable efforts to mitigate any damages.

6. CITY MANAGEMENT
Cesar Ortiz shall represent CITY in all matters pertaining to the administration of this AGREEMENT, including review and approval of all materials submitted by CONSULTANT, but not including the authority to enlarge the tasks to be performed or change the compensation due to CONSULTANT. The City Manager shall be authorized to act on CITY’S behalf and to execute all necessary documents that enlarge the tasks to be performed or change CONSULTANT's compensation, subject to Section 6 hereof.

Page 830 of 989 ends

05/2026 – Reformatted JJA
2 7. PAYMENT
(a) CITY agrees to pay CONSULTANT in accordance with the payment rates, terms, and schedule of payment set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full. This amount shall not exceed Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($250,000.00) (“TOTAL CONTRACT SUM”) for the total term of this AGREEMENT unless additional payment is approved as provided in this AGREEMENT. (b) CONSULTANT shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this AGREEMENT that are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Manager. This written authorization requirement cannot be waived. CONSULTANT shall be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by the City Manager and CONSULTANT at the time CITY’s written authorization is given to CONSULTANT for the performance of said additional services. The City Manager’s authority to approve additional compensation is subject to Laguna Hills Municipal Code section 3.08.150. Approval of additional compensation that exceeds the City Manager’s authority as specified in Laguna Hills Municipal Code section 3.08.150 must be obtained from the City Council.
(c) CONSULTANT shall submit reasonably detailed invoices monthly for actual services performed and, as applicable, equipment and materials acquired. Invoices shall be submitted on or about the first business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to all non-disputed fees. If the CITY disputes ant of CONSULTANT’s fees it shall give written notice to CONSULTANT within 30 days of receipt of an invoice of any disputed fess set forth on the invoice.

8. PUBLIC WORK
Notice is provided pursuant to Labor Code Section 1781 that all or a portion of the work contemplated in this AGREEMENT may constitute a “public work” as defined in Chapter 1, Part 7, and Division 2 of the Labor Code, to which Section 1771 applies. If all or a portion of the work contemplated under this AGREEMENT constitutes “public work,” then CONSULTANT shall pay prevailing wages, unless exempt, on those portions of the work which require payment of prevailing wages under the prevailing wage laws (Labor Code, §§ 1720 et seq.), and shall comply with the following to the extent applicable:
(a) Prevailing Wage Rates. Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1773.2, copies of the prevailing rate of per diem wages can be found at the California Department of Industrial Relations’ official website (www.dir.ca.go), which shall be made available to any interested party upon request. CONSULTANT shall post a copy of the determination of the director of the prevailing rate of per diem wages at each job site. Said per diem wages are deemed to include employer payments for health and welfare, pension, vacation and travel time, and subsistence pay, all in accordance with Section 1773.1 of the Labor Code. (b) Payroll Records. The provisions of Section 1776 of the Labor Code regarding the preparation, maintenance, and filing of payroll records are applicable to this AGREEMENT.

CONSULTANT and each subconsultant shall keep accurate payroll records showing the name, address, social security number, work classification, straight time, and overtime hours worked each day and week, and the actual per diem wages paid to each journeyman, apprentice, worker, or other employee employed by them in connection with the public work. Certified payroll records shall be on forms provided by the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement or

Page 831 of 989 ends

05/2026 – Reformatted JJA
3 contain the same information. CONSULTANT’S AND ANY SUBCONSULTANT’S PAYROLL RECORDS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO CITY ON A WEEKLY BASIS. CONSULTANT SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SUBMITTAL OF SUBCONSULTANT’S PAYROLL RECORDS. Additionally, CONSULTANT or subconsultant has ten (10) days in which to comply subsequent to receipt of a written notice requesting the records enumerated in Section 1776, subdivision (a), of the Labor Code. In the event that CONSULTANT or subconsultant fails to comply within the ten (10) day period, they shall, as a penalty to CITY, forfeit One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each worker, until strict compliance is effectuated. CITY may deduct this penalty from any monies due or that may become due CONSULTANT under this AGREEMENT. (c) Penalty. CONSULTANT and any subconsultant under CONSULTANT shall, as a penalty to CITY, forfeit not more than Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00) for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each worker paid (either by CONSULTANT or any subconsultant under CONSULTANT) less than the prevailing rate set forth herein on the work provided for in this AGREEMENT. CITY may deduct the penalty from any monies due or that may become due CONSULTANT under this AGREEMENT. The difference between the prevailing wage rates and the amount paid to each worker for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for which each worker was paid less than the prevailing wage rate shall also be paid to each worker by CONSULTANT or subconsultant, in accordance with Section 1775 of the Labor Code of the State of California.
(d) Apprentices. If applicable, the provisions of Labor Code Section 1777.5 requiring the use of apprentices in certain ratios to journeymen are hereby imposed upon CONSULTANT and each subconsultant.
(e) Legal Day’s Work. In the performance of this AGREEMENT, not more than eight (8) hours shall constitute a day’s work, and CONSULTANT shall not require more than eight (8) hours of labor in a day from any person employed by them hereunder except as provided in Labor Code Section 1815. CONSULTANT and each subconsultant shall conform to Article 3, Chapter 1, Part 7 (Sections 1810 et seq.), of the Labor Code of the State of California, and it is agreed that CONSULTANT shall forfeit to CITY as a penalty the sum of TwentyFive Dollars ($25.00) for each worker employed in the execution of this AGREEMENT by CONSULTANT or any subconsultant for each calendar day during which any worker is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in any one (1) calendar day and forty (40) hours in any one (1) week in violation of said article. CITY may deduct this penalty from any monies due or that may become due pursuant to this AGREEMENT.

9. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE (a) CITY may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this AGREEMENT, or any portion hereof, by serving upon CONSULTANT, at least thirty (30) days prior written notice. CITY shall not be obligated to explain its reasons for termination. Upon receipt of said notice, CONSULTANT shall immediately cease all work under this AGREEMENT, unless the notice provides otherwise. If CITY suspends or terminates a portion of this AGREEMENT such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this AGREEMENT. (b) In the event this AGREEMENT is suspended or terminated pursuant to this section, CITY shall pay to CONSULTANT the actual value of the work performed up to the time of suspension or termination, provided that the work performed is performed in accordance to this AGREEMENT. Upon suspension or termination of the AGREEMENT pursuant to this section, CONSULTANT will, as a precondition to being compensated, submit

Page 832 of 989 ends

05/2026 – Reformatted JJA
4 an invoice to CITY detailing work performed up to the time of suspension or termination within thirty (30) days of the effective date of suspension or termination.

10. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT
(a) CONSULTANT's failure to comply with the provisions of this AGREEMENT shall constitute a material default. In the event that CONSULTANT is in default for cause under the terms of this AGREEMENT, CITY shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating CONSULTANT for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this AGREEMENT immediately by written notice to CONSULTANT. If such failure by the CONSULTANT to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond CONSULTANT's control, and without fault or negligence of CONSULTANT, it shall not be considered a default.
(b) As an alternative to the procedure for immediate termination for default set forth in subparagraph (a), if CITY determines that CONSULTANT is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this AGREEMENT, CITY may in its discretion cause to be served upon CONSULTANT a written notice of the default and demand to cure.

CONSULTANT shall have ten (10) calendar days after service upon it of said notice to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that CONSULTANT fails to cure its default within such period of time, CITY shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this AGREEMENT, to terminate this AGREEMENT without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity, or under this AGREEMENT.

11. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS
(a) CONSULTANT shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to the plans, specifications, estimates, drawings, design calculations, letters, reports, testing results, and other such information including as-built records as required by CITY that relate to the performance of services under this AGREEMENT. CONSULTANT shall maintain adequate records of services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services.

All such records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identified and readily accessible. CONSULTANT shall provide free access to the representatives of CITY or its designees at reasonable times to such books and records; shall give CITY the right to examine and audit said books and records; shall permit CITY to make copies and transcripts therefrom as necessary; and shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to this AGREEMENT. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years after receipt of final payment. (b) Upon completion of, or in the event of termination, or suspension of this AGREEMENT, all original documents, plans, specifications, engineer’s estimates, electronic files, and other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this AGREEMENT shall become the sole property of CITY and may be used, reused, or otherwise disposed of by CITY without the permission of CONSULTANT. If CITY modifies or otherwise utilizes the CONSULTANT’s documents for any purpose not related to this Agreement, it does so at its sole risk and without any liability on the part of CONSULTANT.

With respect to computer files, CONSULTANT shall make available to CITY, upon reasonable written request by CITY, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring, and printing computer files.

12. PATENT AND COPYRIGHT INFRINGMENT
(a) To the fullest extent permitted by law, and in lieu of any other warranty by CITY or

Page 833 of 989 ends

05/2026 – Reformatted JJA
5 CONSULTANT against patent or copyright infringement, statutory or otherwise, it is agreed that CONSULTANT shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless at its expense any claim or suit against CITY, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers, on account of any allegation that any item furnished under this AGREEMENT, or the normal use or sale thereof arising out of the performance of this AGREEMENT, infringes upon any U.S. or foreign, letters patent or copyright or other intellectual property right, and CONSULTANT shall pay all costs and damages finally awarded in any such suit or claim, provided that CONSULTANT is promptly notified in writing of the suit or claim and given authority, information and assistance at CONSULTANT’S expense for the defense of same, and provided such suit or claim arises out of, pertains to, or is related to the alleged negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct of CONSULTANT. However, CONSULTANT will not indemnify CITY if the suit or claim results from: (1) CITY’s alteration of a deliverable, such that CITY’S alteration of such deliverable created the infringement upon any U.S. or foreign, letters patent or copyright; or (2) the use of a deliverable in combination with other material not provided by CONSULTANT when it is such use in combination which infringes upon an existing U.S. or foreign letters patent or copyright. (b) CONSULTANT shall have control of the defense of any such claim or suit and all negotiations for settlement thereof, CONSULTANT shall not be obligated to indemnify CITY under any settlement made without CONSULTANT’S consent or in the event CITY fails to cooperate in the defense of any suit or claim, provided, however, that such defense shall be at CONSULTANT’S expense. If the use or sale of such item is enjoined as a result of the suit or claim, CONSULTANT, at no expense to CITY, shall obtain for CITY the right to use and sell the item, or shall substitute an equivalent item acceptable to CITY and extend this patent and copyright indemnity thereto.

13. INSURANCE
Prior to performing any work or receiving any compensation under this AGREEMENT, CONSULTANT shall obtain, and thereafter maintain for the duration of this AGREEMENT, insurance coverage as specified in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. This duty or obligation shall survive the lapse, termination, or completion of this AGREEMENT.

14. NON-LIABILITY OF CITY OFFICERS, AGENTS, EMPLOYEES AND VOLUNTEERS No officer, agent, employee and/or volunteer of the CITY shall be personally liable to the CONSULTANT, or any successor-in-interest, in the event of any default or breach by the CITY or for any amount which may become due to the CONSULTANT or to its successor, or for breach of any obligation of the terms of this AGREEMENT.

15. WARRANTY FOR GOODS
(a) If this AGREEMENT includes the purchase of equipment, supplies, or chattel (hereafter “GOODS”), CONSULTANT shall provide the following warranty of said GOODS, or obtain a warranty from the manufacturer and/or retailer with provisions equal to or exceeding those specified in this Section. In the event the manufacturer’s warranty or retailer’s warranty do not equal or exceed the protections specified in this Section, CONSULTANT agrees to provide said warranty protections. The warranty described hereunder extends to the original purchaser of the GOODS warranted under the warranty, and to each transferee owner of the GOODS. The term of this warranty begins on the date the GOODS are delivered to and accepted by CITY, and continues therefrom. CONSULTANT warrants that:
(1) The GOODS will function properly under normal use, will be of good workmanship, free from defect, of merchantable quality, and fit for CITY’s intended use; (2) The GOODS will fully comply with any specifications provided by

Page 834 of 989 ends

05/2026 – Reformatted JJA
6 CITY and any samples or documentation provided by CONSULTANT; (3) The GOODS will be free of any security interests, liens, or encumbrances and CONSULTANT has title to the GOODS;
(4) The GOODS will not violate any intellectual property rights of any third party;
(5) The GOODS will be delivered free of the rightful claim of a third person by way of infringement; and
(6) The GOODS are merchantable in accordance with Commercial Code Section 2314.
(b) The warranty listed above is in addition to any other warranties made by CONSULTANT, the manufacturer, retailer, or imposed by law. All warranties will survive inspection and payment by CITY and are assignable to CITY’s successors and assigns. If any GOODS do not meet the warranty, CITY may, at CITY’s option, and without additional cost to CITY:
(1) Require CONSULTANT to repair or replace the GOODS until the GOODS meet the warranty. If CONSULTANT cannot replace the GOODS and repair either is not commercially practicable or cannot be made within five (5) days of CITY’s written notice, CONSULTANT will refund the purchase price of the GOODS; (2) Return any of the GOODS to CONSULTANT at CONSULTANT’s expense for a full refund;
(3) Correct the nonconformance and charge CONSULTANT for the costs to make the correction; or
(4) Engage a third party to provide substitute GOODS and charge CONSULTANT for the costs of obtaining the substitute GOODS from the third party.

16. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
(a) CONSULTANT is and shall at all times remain as to the CITY a wholly independent contractor having only the contractual duties and obligations agreed upon as memorialized in this AGREEMENT. The personnel performing the services under this AGREEMENT on behalf of CONSULTANT shall at all times be under CONSULTANT's exclusive direction and control.

Neither CITY nor any of its officers, officials, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of CONSULTANT or any of CONSULTANT's officers, employees, or agents, except as set forth in this AGREEMENT. CONSULTANT shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees, or agents are in any manner officers, employees, or agents of the CITY. CONSULTANT shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation, or liability whatsoever against CITY, or bind CITY in any manner, whether in law or equity.
(b) No employee benefits shall be available to CONSULTANT in connection with the performance of this AGREEMENT. Except for the fees paid to CONSULTANT as provided in this AGREEMENT, CITY shall not pay, nor be deemed to have paid or delivered, salaries, wages, or other compensation to CONSULTANT for performing services hereunder for CITY.

CITY shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to CONSULTANT for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. In addition to the indemnification provisions of Section 11, CONSULTANT shall indemnify, defend, and hold CITY harmless from claims or liability arising from CONSULTANT’s employees for CITY benefits including, but not limited to, pension, health benefits, holiday, vacations, etc. (c) If CONSULTANT, or any of its employees, agens, or subconsultants performing work under this AGREEMENT, claims or is determined by the court or the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (PERS) to qualify as a CITY employee for PERS purposes,

Page 835 of 989 ends

05/2026 – Reformatted JJA
7 CONSULTANT shall defend, indemnify and hold the CITY harmless from any related costs.

These costs include all required PERS contributions (both employee and employer shares), as well as associated penalties and interest that would otherwise be the CITY’s responsibility.

17. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES
CONSULTANT shall keep itself informed of State and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect its requirements under this Agreement, and those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service, duties, and obligations pursuant to this AGREEMENT. CONSULTANT shall at all times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. CITY, and its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of CONSULTANT to comply with this Section.

This section shall survive, without limitation, the termination, lapse or completion of this Agreement.

18. COVENANT AGAINST DISCRIMINATION
In connection with its performance under this AGREEMENT, CONSULTANT shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, disability, medical condition, religion, color, sex, sexual orientation, age, marital status, ancestry, or national origin. CONSULTANT shall ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during their employment, without regard to their race, disability, medical condition, religion, color, sex, sexual orientation, age, marital status, ancestry, or national origin. Such actions shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship.

19. POLITICAL REFORM ACT
If the Political Reform Act requires CONSULTANT to file a Form 700, then CONSULTANT must file a Form 700 with full disclosure within thirty 30 days of assuming office and thereafter must file an annual statement for each calendar year of this AGREEMENT.

20. CONFLICT OF INTEREST
No officer, agent or employee of the CITY shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this AGREEMENT nor shall any such officer or employee participate in any decision relating to the AGREEMENT which affects his or her financial interest or the financial interest of any corporation, partnership, or association in which they are, directly or indirectly, interested in violation of any state statute or regulation. CONSULTANT represents and warrants that it has not paid or given and will not pay or give any third party, including any CITY officer, agent, employee any money or other consideration in exchange for obtaining this AGREEMENT.

21. UNDUE INFLUENCE
CONSULTANT declares and warrants that no undue influence or pressure is used against or in concert with any officer or employee of CITY in connection with the award, terms, or implementation of this AGREEMENT, including any method of coercion, confidential financial arrangement, or financial inducement. No officer or employee of the CITY will receive compensation, directly or indirectly, from CONSULTANT, or from any officer, employee, or agent of CONSULTANT, in connection with the award of this AGREEMENT or any work to be conducted as a result of this AGREEMENT. Violation of this section shall be a material breach of this AGREEMENT entitling CITY to any and all remedies at law or in equity.

Page 836 of 989 ends

05/2026 – Reformatted JJA
8 22. NO BENEFIT TO ARISE TO LOCAL EMPLOYEES
No member, officer, or employee of CITY, or their designees or agents, and no public official who exercises authority over or responsibilities with respect to the project during their tenure or for one year thereafter, shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in any agreement or sub-agreement, or the proceeds thereof, for work to be performed in connection with this AGREEMENT.

23. RELEASE OF INFORMATION / CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
(a) All information gained by CONSULTANT in performance of this AGREEMENT shall be considered confidential and shall not be released by CONSULTANT without CITY’s prior written authorization. CONSULTANT, its officers, employees, agents, or subconsultants, shall not without written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the Attorney for the City, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories, or other information concerning the work performed under this AGREEMENT or relating to any project or property located within the CITY. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered “voluntary” provided CONSULTANT gives CITY notice of such court order or subpoena.
(b) CONSULTANT shall promptly notify CITY should CONSULTANT, its officers, employees, agents, or subconsultants be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, requests for admissions, or other discovery request, court order, or subpoena from any person or party regarding this AGREEMENT and the work performed thereunder or with respect to any project or property located within the CITY. CONSULTANT agrees to cooperate fully with CITY and to provide the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by CONSULTANT.

However, CITY's right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by CITY to control, direct, or rewrite said response.

24. SECURITY OF INFORMATION
CONSULTANT shall identify reasonably foreseeable internal and external risks to the privacy and security of personal information acquired during performance of this AGREEMENT that could result in the unauthorized disclosure, misuse, alteration, destruction, or other compromise of the information. CONSULTANT shall regularly assess the sufficiency of any safeguards and information security awareness training in place to control reasonably foreseeable internal and external risks, and evaluate and adjust those safeguards in light of the assessment.

25. NOTICES
Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this AGREEMENT must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, which provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by notice:

CITY CONSULTANT
City of Laguna Hills RKA Consulting Group, Inc.
24035 El Toro Rd 398 Lemon Creek Drive, Suite E
Laguna Hills, CA 92653 Walnut, CA 91789

Page 837 of 989 ends

05/2026 – Reformatted JJA
9 Attn: City Clerk Attn: Cody Howing, Vice President

26. ASSIGNMENT
CONSULTANT shall not assign the performance of this AGREEMENT, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without the prior written consent of CITY, which the CITY may grant or withhold in its sole and absolute discretion, with no obligation to disclose the basis for its decision to any person, firm, entity, or Party. ☒ [Check if Applicable] CONSULTANT shall provide CITY fourteen (14) days’ notice prior to the departure of any key personnel from CONSULTANT’s employ. Should key personnel leave CONSULTANT’s employ, CITY shall have the option to immediately terminate this AGREEMENT, within three (3) days of the close of said notice period. Upon termination of this AGREEMENT, CONSULTANT’s sole compensation shall be payment for actual services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise agreed to in writing between the City Council and CONSULTANT.
☐ [Check if Applicable] Because of the personal nature of the services to be rendered pursuant to this AGREEMENT, only _______________(“PRINCIPAL”) shall perform the services described in this AGREEMENT. PRINCIPAL may use assistants, under their direct supervision, to perform some of the services under this AGREEMENT. CONSULTANT shall provide CITY fourteen (14) day's notice prior to the departure of PRINCIPAL from CONSULTANT's employ. Should they leave CONSULTANT's employ, CITY shall have the option to immediately terminate this AGREEMENT, within three (3) days of the close of said notice period. Upon termination of this AGREEMENT, CONSULTANT's sole compensation shall be payment for actual services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise agreed to in writing between CITY and CONSULTANT.

27. LICENSES, PERMITS AND FEES
At all times during the term of this AGREEMENT and prior to commencement of any work under this AGREEMENT, CONSULTANT shall have in full force and effect, all licenses and permits required of it by law for the performance of the services described in this AGREEMENT, including, but not limited to, obtaining and maintaining a Laguna Hills business license. This includes payments of all applicable fees and other charges necessary for such compliance and performance.

28. GOVERNING LAW
CITY and CONSULTANT understand and agree that the laws of the State of California, or, as necessary, the laws of the United States Federal government, shall govern the rights, obligations, duties, and liabilities of the parties to this AGREEMENT and also govern the interpretation of this AGREEMENT. Any litigation concerning this AGREEMENT shall take place in Orange County Superior Court or Central District of California Federal District Court.

29. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
This AGREEMENT contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this AGREEMENT. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations, and statements, oral or written, direct or implied, are merged into this AGREEMENT and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this AGREEMENT based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. Each Party has had the opportunity to have this Agreement reviewed by independent legal counsel of its own selection and is not relying on any representations, opinions, or advice of the other Party.

Page 838 of 989 ends

05/2026 – Reformatted JJA
10 30. CONTENTS OF REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL AND PROPOSAL
CONSULTANT is bound by the contents of CITY’s Request for Proposals and the contents of the Proposal submitted by CONSULTANT. In the event of conflict, this AGREEMENT shall take precedence over CITY’s Request for Proposals and CONSULTANT’s Proposal; and CITY’s Request for Proposals shall take precedence over CONSULTANT’s Proposal. No limitation of CONSULTANT’s liability, waiver of rights of CITY, or release of rights or remedies held by CITY, contained in CONSULTANT’s Proposal shall be of any force or effect.

31. INTERPRETATION
In the event of conflict or inconsistency between this AGREEMENT and any other document, including any proposal or Exhibit hereto, this AGREEMENT shall control unless a contrary intent is clearly stated. This AGREEMENT shall be interpreted as though drafted by all parties hereto.

32. MODIFICATION
No modification to this AGREEMENT shall be effective unless it is in writing and signed by authorized representatives of the parties hereto. The written modification requirement cannot be waived.

33. ATTORNEY FEES
In any action or proceeding brought by either party against the other party arising out of or in any way connected to this AGREEMENT, or where any provision hereof is validly asserted as a defense, the parties shall bear their own attorney’s fees, costs, and expenses. Nothing in this provision shall excuse CONSULTANT’s duty to provide CITY with a defense at CONSULTANT’s cost when CITY receives a complaint, petition, or other pleading from a third party requiring CITY to defend itself.

34. SEVERABILITY
If any provision of this AGREEMENT is held to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable by court or jurisdiction, that provision shall be severed from the AGREEMENT, and the remaining provisions shall be in full force and effect.

35. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT
The person or persons executing this AGREEMENT on behalf of CONSULTANT warrants and represents that they have the authority to execute this AGREEMENT on behalf of CONSULTANT and have the authority to bind CONSULTANT to the performance of its obligations hereunder. CONSULTANT agrees that the person executing this AGREEMENT is an authorized agent of the CONSULTANT with the power to bind CONSULTANT to this AGREEMENT.

Page 839 of 989 ends

05/2026 – Reformatted JJA
11 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this AGREEMENT to be executed the day and year first above written.
“CITY”
CITY OF LAGUNA HILLS, a California
Municipal Corporation
“CONSULTANT”
RKA CONSULTING GROUP, INC., a
California Corporation
By:

Bob Wingenroth,
City Manager
By:

David Gilbertson,
President
By:

Joshua Stevenson,
City Clerk
By:

Raymond Tao,
Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE
By:

Colin Burns,
Interim City Attorney

Page 840 of 989 ends
← All documents from this meeting