225
A. GENERAL INFORMATION
The City of Lathrop (" City") requests proposals from qualified firms ( individually, a Respondent" and collectively, " Respondents") for Bulk Fuel Supply and Delivery Services Project").
Bulk Fuel ( Unleaded gasoline ( 87 Octane), No. 2 clear carb diesel fuel and diesel exhaust fluid DEF)) Supplied and Delivered Services is what the City is requiring for its fueling station, located at 2112 E. Louise Avenue, Lathrop, CA 95330 and its remote pump stations and generators. These services must be available and be provided 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, and 365 days per year.
Respondent' sdelivery vehicles and procedures must meet all applicable federal, state and/ orlocal regulations. Requests for Proposal ( RFP) packets are available on the City of Lathrop website:
https:// www. ci. lathrop. ca. us/ rfps
B. BACKGROUND
The City ofLathrop is located in the Northern San Joaquin Valley, east and west ofthe San Joaquin River. Interstate 5, Interstate 205 and State Route 120 intersect within the City. Lathrop was incorporated in 1989, with its first General Plan adopted in 1991.
Lathrop is centrally located within a 30 -minute commute of Tracy, Manteca, Stockton, Lodi, Modesto, Livermore and Pleasanton. Lathrop' spopulation as of January 1, 2024 reported by the State of California Department of Finance, is 37, 033 which represents a 5.4% growth from 2023.
The City of Lathrop continues to make headlines as one of California' sfastest growing communities.
The City' s fueling station supports an excess of 130 City vehicles and a variety of heavy equipment. ( i.e. tractors, generators, lifts, etc.)
C. ANTICIPATED SCOPE OF SERVICES
Respondent shall submit Material Safety Data Sheets ( MSDS) for all products with proposal.
Markup shall include transportation, overhead, profit, and all other associated costs. Petroleum products shall meet or exceed all State of California requirements.
1. Fuel
Respondent shall provide Bulk Fuel ( Unleaded gasoline ( 87 Octane), No. 2 clear carb diesel fuel and DEF).
2. Delivery
Respondent agrees to supply and deliver bulk fuel and bulk petroleum at all hours of the day and all days of the year, as needed. Respondent' sdelivery vehicles and procedures must meet all applicable federal, state and/ orlocal regulations.
226
Delivery and control of inventory shall be the responsibility ofthe Respondent and is expected to be maintained at all times, without exception at no less than twenty percent ( 20%) of their capacity and with a priced invoice accompanying each shipment. Respondent must have tank monitoring system for the Fuel Station to alert when refueling will be necessary to stay above required minimum level, as required to protect the fuel pump and fuel filter.
In the event of an emergency, Respondent agrees to deliver needed fuel within 4 hours and continue to deliver fuel for the remainder of the emergency, as the City requires. Respondent shall identify a 24 -hour emergency contact and/ or 24 -hour emergency phone number in case of an emergency.
The Corporation Yard Fuel Station (" Fuel Station") located at 2112 E. Louise Avenue houses:
ONE ( 1) 5, 000 -gallon unleaded storage tank, not to exceed 90% capacity ONE ( 1) 3, 000 -gallon # 2 diesel storage tank, not to exceed 90% capacity ONE ( 1) 1, 000 -gallon diesel exhaust fluid storage tank, not to exceed 50% capacity The City is also requesting as part of this RFP for Respondent to supply and deliver bulk fuel to other City Sites as needed, however no less however than on a bi- annual basis ( March & September). Generators shall maintain at no less than seventy- fivepercent ( 75%) at all times, without exception as ordered by City staff. The list ofremote pump station and generator locations is included in Attachment 1.
3. Inspections and Maintenance
Respondent shall perform an annual inspection of the Fuel Station to ensure all dispensing equipment is functioning properly and replace the fuel filters as needed, however, no less than every 6 months.
4. Interruptions in Service
Respondent shall notify the City at least three ( 3) days in advance of any foreseeable potential interruptions in service ( e.g. — work stoppages, facility/ equipment maintenance, etc.) to ensure anticipated down time is managed properly and effectively.
5. Reporting
Respondent must have the ability to provide reports upon request by the City. Information to be provided by Respondent will include but may not be limited to a monthly, year- to- dateand/ orprior year( s) history of fuel type, gallons delivered, and amount purchased by the City.
Respondent shall also provide, upon request ofthe City, printed or electronic copies ofOil Price Information Service ( OPIS) pricing documentation, as needed, in order to validate invoice pricing.
For the purpose of reconciliation, Respondent shall provide hard copy receipts at the time of delivery.
227
6. Fuel Pricing
Provide a Proposed Price Schedule for the Services that is fully inclusive of all costs to provide the Services, including hourly billing rates, all labor, materials, equipment, supplies, the insurance required under the terms of the Agreement, travel fees, etc. Attach a copy of billing rates that
would apply to any authorized additional Services. The price for DEF shall be based on the Respondent' s percent markup per gallon, fully inclusive of all costs to provide the Services. The price for unleaded gasoline and No. 2 clear carb diesel fuel shall be based on the stated differential above (+) or below (-) the Monday morning Oil Price Information Service ( OPIS) average rack reference quoted for the Stockton, California market in the week of purchase. The price will be determined by adding or subtracting the stated differential to or from the published weekly Monday morning OPIS average rack to obtain the invoice price (excluding taxes for each week).
If OPTS does not report a Monday average market area price for a single week, the most recent prior week' s
published Monday market price shall be used in computing the invoice price. If two 2) or more weeks pass without the publishing ofprices, it shall be the Respondent' sresponsibility to notify the City, and the Deputy City Manager, or designee, will then negotiate an interim price to be used until a current OPIS average price is again published for the Stockton market area.
Ifthe marketing publication is substantially modified or discontinued, the City reserves the right to reestablish the price mechanism of the bid, or to cancel all or part of the contract without prejudice against any party to the contract.
7. Freight/ Transportation Costs
All freight and transportation costs shall be included in pricing.
8. Taxes
City shall only pay mandated federal and state taxes and/ orfees, as required. All Respondent transportation, environmental and/ or other additive costs shall be included in the OPIS differential.
9. Compensation
Payment for Fueling and Petroleum Products shall be based on the Pricing Information schedule percent
submitted
markup
with the
per
Respondent' s
gallon, fully
proposal.
inclusive
The
of
price
all costs
for DEF
to provide
shall be
the
based
Services.
on the
The
Respondent' s
price for
unleaded gasoline and No. 2 clear carb diesel fuel shall be based on a stated differential above (+) or below (-) the Monday morning Oil Price Information Service ( OPIS) average rack reference quoted for the Stockton, California market in the week ofpurchase.
Invoices must be mailed to: City of Lathrop, 390 Towne Centre Drive, Lathrop, CA 95330, Attention: Thomas Hedegard, Deputy City Manager.
Payment for services will be made at monthly intervals and will be based upon the fuel provided at the close of the billing period. Respondent can expect payment within 45- 60 days of invoice receipt.
228
D. RFP CONTENT
The proposals shall include, but not be limited to the following information:
Description of the respondents information on similar types of services that the firm performs.
Provide information on the firm' sdelivery services.
Identify any services that are specifically excluded from the Scope of Work that will likely be needed to complete the project of the desired scope of work.
E. EVALUATION CRITERIA
The City will consider the Respondent' sproposals, experience, expertise and level ofprofessional service and advice in the award of the project. The City may also choose to take into account the Respondent' sperformance in past and ongoing projects, ifapplicable.
F. AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES
The City has provided a copy of the Service Contract. Please review this agreement and provide the City with a written statement of your firm' swillingness to accept the terms of the agreement.
Please specifically identify each term of the agreement which your firm is unwilling to accept and the reason therefore ( See Attachment No. 2). Please provide proposed Compensation and Scope of Work Exhibits with your proposal. Furthermore, firms proposing this project shall adhere to, and comply with federal and state regulations.
The top firm shall, within ten calendar days from the date of the Notice of Intent to Award, provide the City with the following documents: insurance and endorsements acceptable to the City of Lathrop, proof of purchase of a City business license, any other documents and certificates required by the RFP, and a signed Service Contract provided by the project manager.
G. REVISION TO THE RFP
The City reserves the right to revise the RFP prior to the date that responses are due. The City reserves the right to extend the date by which the responses are due. Revisions and extensions to the RFP shall be posted on the City' s
website and will be the responsibility of the proposer to check for any and all addendums prior to submittal at: Bids and RFPs City of Lathrop CA The City also reserves the right to reject any or all the responses, and to re -initiate or abandon the RFP process.
H. SELECTION PROCESS
The City shall review the responses for completeness, clarity and content. The City' sreview will be based on firm' s
experience and performance in past and ongoing projects, if applicable. Based on the review, the City may choose to shortlist certain firms for further consideration.
229
The Respondent, by submitting a
response to this RFP, waives all rights to protest or seek any legal remedies whatsoever regarding any aspect of this RFP. This RFP does not commit the City to award a contract, to defray cost incurred in the preparation of a proposal pursuant to this RFP or to procure or contract for work.
When the City has negotiated a
scope of work and cost proposal with a chosen Respondent, it will recommend selection of that Respondent to the City Council. Confirmation and approval of the Respondent recommended by the City is subject to approval by the City Council.
The City reserves the right to reject any and all proposals, or to negotiate separately with any source whatsoever in any manner necessary to serve the best interests ofthe City. Non -acceptance of any proposal does not imply any criticism of the proposal or imply that the proposal was deficient.
The City will follow the selection schedule listed below but reserves the right to modify the schedule in any manner necessary to serve the best interests of the City.
I. PROPOSED SCHEDULE
Release Request for Proposals
RFP Response Deadline
Notice ofIntent to Award
City Council Awards Contract
Commence Services
April 10, 2025
5: 00 PM, May 1, 2025
May 5, 2025
May 12, 2025
June 2025
Costs for responding to this RFP are entirely the responsibility of the Respondent and shall not be chargeable in any way to the City. All material submitted becomes the property of the City and may be returned only at the City' soption.
One ( 1) bound copy and one ( 1) electronic . pdf copy shall be addressed to contact below and emailed to ederas@ci. lathrop. ca. us (no usb' sshall be received). RFP response shall be signed by an authorized representative of the proposing entity, shall be delivered on or before 5: 00 pm, May 1, 2025, to:
Evette Deras, Administrative Assistant
City of Lathrop, Department of Parks and Recreation
390 Towne Centre Drive
Lathrop, CA 95330
Note that proposals received after this time and date may be rejected.
For general questions, only the authorized project representative should contact Evette Deras, Administrative Assistant electronically at ederas@ci. lathrop. ca. us.
Thank you for your interest in serving the people ofthe City ofLathrop.
230
J. ATTACHMENTS
Attachment I — Remote Fuel Locations Listing
Attachment 2 — Sample Professional Services Agreement
231
ATTACHMENT 1 - REMOTE FUEL LOCATIONS LISTING
CITY OF LATHROP
REMOTE FUEL LOCATIONS
The City of Lathrop houses pump stations and generators at various locations throughout the City, which will need to be refilled to full capacity twice annually and within a four (4) hour response time in the event of an emergency, upon request by the City. 105 Travertine Avenue
ONE ( 1) 400 -gallon Genset
11800 S. Harlan Road
ONE ( 1) 190 -gallon Genset
13711 Tracywood Avenue
ONE ( 1) 500 -gallon Genset
ONE ( 1) 72 -gallon Fire Pump
14855 Woodfield Road
ONE ( 1) 142 -gallon Genset
1501 Lathrop Road
ONE ( 1) 350 -gallon Pump Station
15117 Stanford Crossing
ONE ( 1) 650 -gallon Genset
15800 Fifth Street ( Off McKinley Avenue)
ONE ( 1) 250 -gallon Genset
16099 S. McKinley Avenue
ONE ( 1) 215 -gallon Genset
16132 Shelter Cove
ONE ( 1) 400 -gallon Genset
17150 Cobble Creek
ONE (1) 1, 000 -gallon Genset
17287 Golden Valley Parkway
ONE ( 1) 430 -gallon Genset
17356 Callerton Avenue
ONE ( 1) 300 -gallon Pump Station
17400 Shideler Parkway
ONE ( 1) 600 -gallon Genset
17550 Shideler Parkway
ONE ( 1) 500 -gallon Genset
18151 Manthey Road
ONE ( 1) 900 -gallon Genset
18300 Howland Road
ONE ( 1) 250 -gallon Fire Pump
18400 Harlan Road
ONE ( 1) 1, 000 -gallon Pump Station
18421 McKinley Avenue
ONE ( 1) 600 -gallon Genset
1991 Park Street
ONE ( 1) 250 -gallon Genset
2112 E. Louise Avenue
ONE ( 1) 1, 600 -gallon Genset
ONE ( 1) 100 -gallon 80 kW Genset -
Portable
ONE ( 1) 250 -gallon 200 kW Genset -
Portable
ONE ( 1) 482 -gallon 400 kW Genset —
Portable
2444 E. Louise Avenue
ONE ( 1) 1, 000 -gallon Genset
2908 Hemsworth Court
ONE ( 1) 510 -gallon Genset
3540 W. Yosemite Avenue
ONE ( 1) 256 -gallon Genset
390 Towne Centre Drive
ONE ( 1) 550 -gallon Generator
5020 Yosemite Avenue
ONE ( 1) 864 - gallon Generator
593 Inland Passage Way
ONE ( 1) 1, 000 -gallon Genset
232
ATTACHMENT 1 - REMOTE FUEL LOCATIONS LISTING
703 River Islands Parkway
ONE ( 1) 85 -gallon Genset
783-85 Spartan Way
THREE ( 3) Generators which total
2, 000 -gallons
800 J Street
ONE ( 1) 500 -gallon Genset
ONE ( 1) 250 -gallon Fire Pump
832 Towne Centre Drive
ONE ( 1) 300 -gallon Genset
850 Roth Road
ONE ( 1) 350 -gallon Pump Station
940 River Islands Parkway
ONE ( 1) 744 -gallon Generator
952 Stewart Road
ONE ( 1) 1, 697 -gallon Pump Station
ONE ( 1) 749 -gallon Pump Station
ONE ( 1) 51 -gallon Generator
233
Addendum 1
Product MSDS Sheets
234
Safety Data Sheet Chevron
O.
SECTION 1 PRODUCT AND COMPANY IDENTIFICATION
DIESEL FUEL No. 2
Product Use: Fuel [ See Section 16 for Additional Product Numbers] Synonyms: 15 S Diesel Fuel 2; Alternative Low Aromatic Diesel (ALAD); CAL ULS S R6- 20 B0- 5 DF2; CAL ULS S R6- 20 B0- 5DF2DY; Calco LS Diesel 2; CALCO ULS C -BO -B5 DF2; CALCO ULS C -BO -B5 DF2 DYED; CALCO ULS C -B2 DF2; CALCO ULS C -B2 DF2 DYED; CALCO ULS C -B5 DF2; CALCO ULS C -B5 DF2 DYED; Calco ULS DF2; Calco ULS Diesel 2; CALCO ULS S R6- 20 DF2; CALCO ULS S R6- 20 DF2 DYED; CALCO ULS S -BO -B5 DF2 DYED; Calco ULS S -B5 DF2; Calco ULS S -B5 DF2 DYED; CALCO ULS TC- BO-5 DF2; CALCO ULS TC- BO-5 DF2 DYD; CALCO ULS TC- B1 DF2; CALCO ULS TC- B1 DF2 DYED; CALCO ULS TC- B2 DF2; CALCO ULS TC- B2 DF2 DYED; CALCO ULS TC- B3 DF2; CALCO ULS TC- B3 DF2 DYED; CALCO ULS TC- B4 DF2; CALCO ULS TC- B4 DF2 DYED; CALCO ULS TC- B5 DF2; CALCO ULS TC- B5 DF2 DYED; CALCO ULS TX -BO -B5 DF2; CALCO ULS TX -BO -B5 DF2 DYD; CALCO ULS TX -B1 DF2; CALCO ULS TX -B1 DF2 DYED; CALCO ULS TX -B2 DF2; CALCO ULS TX -B2 DF2 DYED; CALCO ULS TX -B3 DF2; CALCO ULS TX -B3 DF2 DYED; CALCO ULS TX -B4 DF2; CALCO ULS TX -B4 DF2 DYED; CALCO ULS TX -B5 DF2; CALCO ULS TX -B5 DF2 DYED; Chevron LS Diesel 2; Chevron ULS Diesel 2; CT ULS C -BO -B5 DF2; CT ULS C -BO -B5 DF2 DYED; CT ULS C -B2 DF2; CT ULS C -B5 DF2; CT ULS S R6- 20 B0- 5 DF2; CT ULS S R6- 20 DF2; CT ULS S R6- 20 DF2 DYED; CT ULS S -BO -B5 DF2 DYED; CT ULS S -B5 DF2; CT ULS S -B5 DF2 DYED; CT ULS S -BO -BS DF2; CT ULS SPECIAL DF2 DYED; CT ULS TC- BO-5 DF2; CT ULS TC- B1 DF2; CT ULS TC- B2 DF2; CT ULS TC- B3 DF2; CT ULS TC- B4 DF2; CT ULS TC- B5 DF2; CT ULS TX -BO -B5 DF2; CT ULS TX -B1 DF2; CT ULS TX -B2 DF2; CT ULS TX -B3 DF2; CT ULS TX -B4 DF2; CT ULS TX -B5 DF2; Diesel Fuel Oil; Diesel Grade No. 2; Diesel No. 2-D S15; Diesel No. 2- D S500; Diesel No. 2- D S5000; Distillates, straight run; Gas Oil; HS Diesel 2; HS Heating Fuel 2; Light Diesel Oil Grade No. 2-D; LS Diesel 2; LS Heating Fuel 2; Marine Diesel; RR Diesel Fuel; Texaco Diesel; Texaco Diesel No. 2; ULS C -BO -B5 DF2; ULS C -BO -B5 DF2 DYED; ULS C -B2 DF2; ULS C -B2 DF2 DYED; ULS C -B5 DF2; ULS C -B5 DF2 DYED; ULS S R6- 20 BO -5 DF2; ULS S R6- 20 B0- 5DF2 DYED; ULS S R6- 20 DF2; ULS S R6- 20 DF2 DF2
DYED; ULS S -BO -B5 DF2 DYED; ULS S -B5 DF2; ULS S -BO -B5 DF2; ULS TC- BO-5 DF2; ULS TC- BO-5 DYED; ULS TC- B1 DF2; ULS TC- Bl DF2 DYED; ULS TC- B2 DF2; ULS TC- B2 DF2 DYED; ULS TC- B3 DF2; ULS TC- B3 DF2 DYED; ULS TC- B4 DF2; ULS TC- B4 DF2 DYED; ULS TC- B5 DF2; ULS TC- B5 DF2 DYED; ULS TX -BO -B5 DF2; ULS TX -BO -B5 DF2 DYED; ULS TX -BI DF2; ULS TX -B1 DF2 DYED; ULS TX - B3 DF2; ULS TX -B3 DF2 DYED; ULS TX -B4 DF2; ULS TX -B4 DF2 DYED; ULS TX -B5 DF2; ULS TX -B5 DF2 DYED; Ultra Low Sulfur Diesel 2 Company Identification
Chevron Products Company
6001 Bollinger Canyon Rd.
San Ramon, CA 94583
United States of America
Transportation Emergency Response
CHEMTREC: (800) 424- 9300 or ( 703) 527- 3887
Health Emergency
Chevron Emergency & Information Center. Located in the USA. International collect calls accepted. (800) 231- 0623 or (510) 231- 0623 Product Information
Revision Number: 29
Revision Date: April 16, 2020 1 of 10 DIESEL FUEL No. 2 SDS : 6894
235
Product Information: ( 800) 582- 3835
SDS Requests: lubemsds@chevron. com
SPECIAL NOTES: This SDS covers all Chevron, Texaco and Calco CARB & non- CARB Diesel No. 2 Fuels.
The sulfur content is less than 0.5% ( mass). Red dye is added to non- taxable fuel. ( SDS 6894) SECTION 2 HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION
CLASSIFICATION: Flammable liquid: Category 3. Aspiration toxicant: Category 1. Carcinogen: Category 1B. Skin irritation: Category 2. Target organ toxicant ( repeated exposure): Category 2. Target organ toxicant central nervous system): Category 3. Acute inhalation toxicant: Category 4. Acute aquatic toxicant Category 2.
Chronic aquatic toxicant: Category 2.
Signal Word: Danger
Physical Hazards: Flammable liquid and vapor.
Health Hazards: May be fatal if swallowed and enters airways. May cause cancer. Causes skin irritation Harmful ifinhaled. May cause drowsiness or dizziness.
Target Organs: May cause damage to organs ( Blood/lood Forming Organs, Liver, Thymus) through prolonged or repeated exposure.
Environmental Hazards: Toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effects.
PRECAUTIONARY STATEMENTS:
General: Keep out ofreach ofchildren. Read label before use.
Prevention: Obtain special instructions before use. Do not handle until all safety precautions have been read and understood. Keep away from heat/ sparks/ openflames/ hot surfaces. — No smoking. Ground/ bond container and receiving equipment. Use only non -sparking tools. Take precautionary measures against static discharge. Keep container tightly closed. Use explosion - proof electrical/ ventilating/ lighting/ equipment. Do not breathe dust/ fme/ gas/ mist/ vapours/ spray. Use only outdoors or in a well -ventilated area. Wear protective gloves/ protective clothing/ eye protection/ face protection. Use personal protective equipment as required. Wash thoroughly after handling. Avoid release to the environment.
Response: IF INHALED: Call a poison center or doctor/ physician if you feel unwell. Remove person to fresh air and keep comfortable for breathing. IF ON SKIN (or hair): Take off immediately all contaminated clothing and wash it before reuse. Rinse skin with water/ shower. If skin irritation occurs: Get medical advice/ attention. IF SWALLOWED: Immediately call a POISON CENTER or doctor/ physician. Do NOT induce vomiting. In case of fire: Use media specified in the SDS to extinguish. Specific treatment ( see Notes to Physician on this label). Collect spillage. IF exposed or concerned: Get medical advice/ attention.
Storage: Store in a well -ventilated place. Keep cool. Keep container tightly closed. Store locked up. Disposal: Dispose ofcontents/ container in accordance with applicable local/ regional/ national/ international regulations.
HAZARDS NOT OTHERWISE CLASSIFIED: Not Applicable
SECTION 3 COMPOSITION/ INFORMATION ON INGREDIENTS
COMPONENTS CAS NUMBER AMOUNT
Total sulfur Mixture 0 - 5000 ppm
Revision Number: 29
Revision Date: April 16, 2020 2 of 10 DIESEL FUEL No. 2 SDS : 6894
236
Diesel Fuel No. 2 68476- 34- 6 95 - 100 % volume
Renewable Diesel Mixture 0 - 20 % volume
Fatty Acid Methyl Esters ( FAME) Mixture 0 - 5 % volume Naphthalene 91- 20- 3 0.2 - < 0. 2 %volume
SECTION 4 FIRST AID MEASURES
Description of first aid measures
Eye: No specific first aid measures are required. As a precaution, remove contact lenses, ifworn, and flush eyes with water.
Skin: Wash skin with water immediately and remove contaminated clothing and shoes. Get medical attention if any symptoms develop. To remove the material from skin, use soap and water. Discard contaminated clothing and shoes or thoroughly clean before reuse.
Ingestion: Ifswallowed, get immediate medical attention. Do not induce vomiting. Never give anything by mouth to an unconscious person.
Inhalation: Move the exposed person to fresh air. Ifnot breathing, give artificial respiration. Ifbreathing is difficult, give oxygen. Get medical attention ifbreathing difficulties continue or if any other symptoms develop.
Most important symptoms and effects, both acute and delayed
IMMEDIATE HEALTH EFFECTS
Eye: Not expected to cause prolonged or significant eye irritation.
Skin: Contact with the skin causes irritation. Symptoms may include pain, itching, discoloration, swelling, and blistering. Contact with the skin is not expected to cause an allergic skin response.
Ingestion: Highly toxic; may be fatal if swallowed. Because of its low viscosity, this material can directly enter the lungs, ifswallowed, or ifsubsequently vomited. Once in the lungs it is very difficult to remove and can cause severe injury or death. May be irritating to mouth, throat, and stomach. Symptoms may include pain, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea.
Inhalation: May be harmful if inhaled. Excessive or prolonged breathing ofthis material may cause central nervous system effects. Central nervous system effects may include headache, dizziness, nausea, vomiting, weakness, loss of coordination, blurred vision, drowsiness, confusion, or disorientation. At extreme exposures, central nervous system effects may include respiratory depression, tremors or convulsions, loss of consciousness, coma or death.
DELAYED OR OTHER HEALTH EIF' rtuCTS:
Cancer: Whole diesel engine exhaust has been classified as a Group 2A carcinogen ( probably carcinogenic to humans) by the International Agency for Research on Cancer ( IARC). Prolonged or repeated exposure to this material may cause cancer. Contains naphthalene, which has been classified as a Group 2B carcinogen ( possibly carcinogenic to humans) by the International Agency for Research on Cancer ( IARC). Target Organs: Contains material that may cause damage to the following organ( s) following repeated inhalation at concentrations above the recommended exposure limit based on animal data: Liver Blood/lood Forming Organs Thymus See Section 11 for additional information. Risk depends on duration and level of exposure.
Indication of any immediate medical attention and special treatment needed Note to Physicians: Ingestion of this product or subsequent vomiting may result in aspiration of light hydrocarbon liquid, which may cause pneumonitis.
SECTION 5 FIRE FIGHTING MEASURES
EXTINGUISHING MEDIA: Use water fog, foam, dry chemical or carbon dioxide (CO2) to extinguish flames. Unusual Fire Hazards: See Section 7 for proper handling and storage.
PROTECTION OF FIRE FIGHTERS:
Fire Fighting Instructions: For fires involving this material, do not enter any enclosed or confined fire space Revision Number: 29
Revision Date: April 16, 2020 3 of 10 DIESEL FUEL No. 2 SDS : 6894
237
without proper protective equipment, including self- contained breathing apparatus. Combustion Products: Highly dependent on combustion conditions. A complex mixture of airborne solids, liquids, and gases including carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and unidentified organic compounds will be evolved when this material undergoes combustion.
SECTION 6 ACCIDENTAL RELEASE MEASURES
Protective Measures: Eliminate all sources of ignition in the vicinity of the spill or released vapor. Ifthis material is released into the work area, evacuate the area immediately. Monitor area with combustible gas indicator.
Spill Management: Stop the source of the release if you can do it without risk. Contain release to prevent further contamination of soil, surface water or groundwater. Clean up spill as soon as possible, observing precautions in Exposure Controls/ Personal Protection. Use appropriate techniques such as applying non- cmbustible absorbent materials or pumping. All equipment used when handling the product must be grounded. A vapor suppressing foam may be used to reduce vapors. Use clean non - Where sparking tools to collect absorbed material. feasible and appropriate, remove contaminated soil. Place contaminated materials in disposable containers and dispose of in a manner consistent with applicable regulations.
Reporting:
8802
Report spills to local authorities and/ or the U. S. Coast Guard' sNational Response Center at (800) 424- as appropriate or required.
SECTION 7 HANDLING AND STORAGE
General Handling Information: Avoid contaminating soil or releasing this material into sewage and systems and bodies of water. drainage Precautionary Measures: Liquid evaporates and forms vapor (fumes) which can catch fire and burn with force. Invisible explosive equipment, and electrical
vapor spreads
motors
easily and can be set on fire by many sources such as pilot lights, welding and switches.
Do not get in eyes, on skin, or on clothing. Do not taste or swallow. Do not breathe breathe mist. Wash vapor or fumes. Do not thoroughly after handling. Keep out ofthe reach ofchildren. accumulate
Unusual Handling
and cause
Hazards:
death.
WARNING!
Slow
Do not use as portable heater or appliance fuel. Toxic fumes may heat generation may occur with oil -soaked rags, spent filter aids and absorbent material and may cause spent spontaneous combustion if stored near combustibles and not handled Store biodiesel soaked properly. rags, filter aids, and spill absorbent material in dispose of approved safety disposal containers and properly. Biodiesel soaked rags may be washed with ventilated area.
soap and water and allowed to dry in well
Static Hazard: Electrostatic charge may accumulate and create a hazardous condition when To minimize this hazard, handling this material. bonding and grounding may be Review all operations which
necessary but may not, by themselves, be sufficient. have the potential of generating and accumulating an electrostatic flammable charge and/ or a atmosphere ( including tank and container filling, splash filling, tank loading, filtering, mixing, cleaning, sampling, gauging, switch agitation, and vacuum truck operations) and use Container Warnings: Container appropriate mitigating procedures. is not designed to contain pressure. Do not use pressure to may rupture with empty container or it explosive force. Empty containers retain product residue ( solid, liquid, and/ or dangerous. Do not vapor) and can be presstuize, cut, weld, braze, solder, drill, grind, or expose such containers to heat, flame, sparks, static electricity, or other sources of ignition. They may explode and cause injury or death. should be completely Empty containers drained, properly closed, and promptly returned to a drum reconditioner or properly. disposed of STORE
General
ONLY
Storage
IN
Information:
WELL VENTILATED
DO NOT USE OR STORE near heat, sparks, flames, or hot surfaces . USE AND AREA. Keep container closed when not in use. l SECTION 8 EXPOSURE CONTROLS/ PERSONAL PROTECTION
GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS:
Consider the potential hazards of this material ( see Section 2), applicable exposure limits, job activities, and other Revision Number: 29
Revision Date: April 16, 2020 4 of 10 DIESEL FUEL No. 2 SDS : 6894
238
substances in the work place when designing engineering controls and selecting personal protective equipment. If engineering controls or work practices are not adequate to prevent exposure to harmful levels ofthis material, the personal protective equipment listed below is recommended. The user should read and understand all instructions and limitations supplied with the equipment since protection is usually provided for a limited time or under certain circumstances.
ENGINEERING CONTROLS:
Use process enclosures, local exhaust ventilation, or other engineering controls to control airborne levels below the recommended exposure limits.
PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT
Eye/ Face Protection: No special eye protection is normally required. Where splashing is possible, wear safety glasses with side shields as a good safety practice.
Skin Protection: Wear protective clothing to prevent skin contact. Selection ofprotective clothing may include gloves, apron, boots, and complete facial protection depending on operations conducted. Suggested materials for protective gloves include: Chlorinated Polyethylene ( or Chlorosulfonated Polyethylene), Nitrile Rubber, Polyurethane, Viton.
Respiratory Protection: Determine ifairborne concentrations are below the recommended occupational exposure limits for jurisdiction of use. If airborne concentrations are above the acceptable limits, wear an approved respirator that provides adequate protection from this material, such as: Air -Purifying Respirator for Organic Vapors.
When used as a
fuel, this material can produce carbon monoxide in the exhaust. Determine if airborne concentrations are below the occupational exposure limit for carbon monoxide. If not, wear an approved positive - pressure air -supplying respirator.
Use a positive pressure air -supplying respirator in circumstances where air -purifying respirators may not provide adequate protection.
Occupational Exposure Limits:
Component
Diesel Fuel No. 2
Diesel Fuel No. 2
Diesel Fuel No. 2
Diesel Fuel No. 2
Naphthalene
Naphthalene
Naphthalene OSHA Z -I
Consult local authorities for appropriate values.
Agency
ACGIH
ACGIH
ACGIH
Form
Inhalable
fraction and
vapor
Vapor
Vapor and
aerosol
TWA
100 mg/3
100 mg/3
100 mg/3
STEL Ceiling
CVX
ACGIH
ACGIH
Vapor and
aerosol
Vapor
100 mg/3
10 ppm
10 ppm
50 mg/3
I SECTION 9 PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES
15 ppm
Notation
Skin total
hydrocarbon
Skin
Skin total
hydrocarbon
Skin total
hydrocarbon
A4 Skin
Skin
Attention: the data below are typical values and do not constitute a specification.
Color: Varies depending on specification
Physical State: Liquid
Odor: Petroleum odor
Odor Threshold: No data available
pH: Not Applicable
Vapor Pressure: 0.4 kPa (Approximate) @ 40 ° C ( 104 °F) Vapor Density ( Air = I): >1 Initial Boiling Point: 175. 6°C (348. 1°F) - 370° C (698° F) Solubility: Soluble in hydrocarbons; insoluble in water Revision Number: 29
Revision Date: April 16, 2020 5 of 10 DIESEL FUEL No. 2 SDS : 6894
239
Freezing Point: Not Applicable
Melting Point: Not Applicable
Specific Gravity: 0. 80 - 0. 88 @ 15. 6°C (60. 1°F) (Typical) Density: No data available
Viscosity: 1. 90 cSt - 4. 10 cSt @ 40° C (104° F)
Coefficient of Therm. Expansion / OF: No data available Evaporation Rate: No data available
Decomposition temperature: No data available
Octanol/ Water Partition Coefficient: No data available FLAMMABLE PROPERTIES:
Flammability ( solid, gas): No Data Available
Flashpoint: ( Pensky- Martens Closed Cup) 52 ° C ( 125 ° F) ( Minimum) Autoignition: 257 ° C (494 ° F)
Flammability ( Explosive) Limits (% by volume in air): Lower: 0. 6 Upper: 4. 7 SECTION 10 STABILITY AND REACTIVITY
Reactivity: May react with strong acids or strong oxidizing agents, such as chlorates, nitrates, peroxides, etc.
Chemical Stability: This material is considered stable under normal ambient and anticipated storage and handling conditions of temperature and pressure.
Conditions to Avoid: Avoid contact with heat, sparks, fire and oxidizing agents Incompatibility With Other Materials: Not applicable
Hazardous Decomposition Products: None known (None expected) Hazardous Polymerization: Hazardous polymerization will not occur.
SECTION 11 TOXICOLOGICAL INFORMATION
Information on toxicological effects
Serious Eye Damage/ Irritation: The eye irritation hazard is based on evaluation of data for similar materials.
Skin Corrosion/ Irritation: The skin irritation hazard is based on evaluation ofdata for similar materials.
Skin Sensitization: The skin sensitization hazard is based on evaluation of data for similar materials.
Acute Dermal Toxicity: The acute dermal toxicity hazard is based on evaluation of data for similar materials.
Acute Oral Toxicity: The acute oral toxicity hazard is based on evaluation of data for similar materials.
Acute Inhalation Toxicity: The acute inhalation
Acute toxicity hazard is based on evaluation of data for similar materials. Toxicity Estimate ( inhalation): 1. 2 mg/ 1 Germ Cell Mutagenicity: The hazard evaluation is based on data for components or a similar material.
Carcinogenicity: The hazard evaluation is based on data for exhaust has been classified as a
components or a similar material. Whole diesel engine Group 2A carcinogen (probably carcinogenic to humans) by the International Agency for Research on Cancer ( IARC). Contains naphthalene, which has been classified as a Group 2B carcinogen (possibly carcinogenic to humans) by the International Agency for Research on Cancer ( IARC).
Reproductive Toxicity: The hazard evaluation is based on data for components or a similar material.
Specific Target Organ Toxicity - Single Exposure: The hazard evaluation is based on data for similar material. components or a Specific Target Organ Toxicity - Repeated Exposure: The hazard evaluation is based on data for similar material. components or a Revision Number: 29
Revision Date: April 16, 2020 6 of 10 DIESEL FUEL No. 2 SDS : 6894
240
ADDITIONAL TOXICOLOGY INFORMATION:
This product contains gas oils.
CONCAWE ( product dossier 95/ 107) has summarized current health, safety and environmental data available for a number of gas oils, typically hydrodesulfurized middle distillates, CAS 64742- 80- 9, straight -run middle distillates, CAS 64741- 44- 2, and/ orlight cat -cracked distillate CAS 64741- 59- 9. CARCINOGENICITY: All materials tested have caused the development of skin tumors in mice, but all featured severe skin irritation and sometimes a long
latency period before tumors developed. Straight -run and cracked gas oil samples were studied to determine the influence of dermal irritation on the carcinogenic activity of middle distillates. At non- irritant doses the straight - run gas oil was not carcinogenic, but at irritant doses, weak activity was demonstrated. Cracked gas oils, when diluted with mineral oil, demonstrated carcinogenic activity irrespective of the occurrence of skin irritation. Gas oils were tested on male mice to study tumor initiating/ promoting activity. The results demonstrated that while a straight -run gas oil sample was neither an initiator or promotor, a blend of straight - run and FCC stock was both a tumor initiator and a promoter.
GENOTOXICITY: Hydrotreated & hydrodesutfurized gas oils range in activity from inactive to weakly positive in in -vitro bacterial mutagenicity assays. Mouse lymphoma assays on straight -run gas oils without subsequent hydrodesulphurization gave positive results in the presence of S9 metabolic activation. In -vivo bone marrow cytogenetics and sister chromatic exchange assay exhibited no activity for straight -run components with or without hydrodesulphurization. Thermally or catalytically cracked gas oils tested with in -vitro bacterial mutagenicity assays in the presence of S9 metabolic activation were shown to be mutagenic. In -vitro sister chromatic exchange assays on cracked gas oil gave equivocal results both with and without S9 metabolic activation. In -vivo bone marrow cytogenetics assay was inactive for two cracked gas oil samples. Three hydrocracked gas oils were tested with in -vitro bacterial mutagenicity assays with S9, and one of the three gave positive results. Twelve distillate fuel samples were tested with in -vitro bacterial mutagenicity assays & with S9 metabolic activation and showed negative to weakly positive results. In one series, activity was shown to be related to the PCA content of samples tested.
Two in -vivo studies were also conducted. A mouse dominant lethal assay was negative for a sample of diesel fuel.
In the other study, 9 samples ofNo 2 heating oil containing 50% cracked stocks caused a slight increase in the number of chromosomal aberrations in bone marrow cytogenetics assays. DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICITY:
Diesel fuel vapor did not cause fetotoxic or teratogenic effects when pregnant rats were exposed on days 6- 15 of pregnancy. Gas oils were applied to the skin ofpregnant rats daily on days 0- 19 of gestation. All but one ( coker light gas oil) caused fetotoxicity ( increased resorption, reduced litter weight, reduced litter size) at dose levels that were also maternally toxic.
The National Institute ofOccupational Safety and Health ( NIOSH) has recommended that whole diesel exhaust be regarded as potentially causing cancer. This recommendation was based on test results showing increased lung cancer in laboratory animals exposed to whole diesel exhaust.
This product contains naphthalene.
GENERAL TOXICITY: Exposure to naphthalene has been reported to cause methemoglobinemia and/ or hemolytic anemia, especially in humans deficient in the enzyme glucose -6 -phosphate dehydrogenase. Laboratory animals given repeated oral doses of naphthalene have developed cataracts. REPRODUCTIVE TOXICITY AND BIRTH DEFECTS: Naphthalene did not cause birth defects when administered orally to rabbits, rats, and mice during pregnancy, but slightly reduced litter size in mice at dose levels that were lethal to the pregnant females.
Naphthalene has been reported to cross the human placenta. GENETIC TOXICITY: Naphthalene caused chromosome aberrations and sister chromatid exchanges in Chinese hamster ovary cells, but was not a mutagen in several other in -vitro tests. CARCINOGENICITY: In a mice
study conducted by the National Toxicology Program ( NTP), exposed to 10 or 30 ppm of naphthalene by inhalation daily for two years had chronic inflammation of the nose and lungs and increased incidences of metaplasia in those tissues. The incidence of benign lung tumors alveolar/ bronchiolar adenomas) was significantly increased in the high -dose female group but not in the male groups. In another two- year inhalation study conducted by NTP, exposure of rats to 10, 30, and 60 caused ppm naphthalene increases in the incidences of a variety of nonneoplastic lesions in the nose. Increases in nasal tumors were seen in both sexes, including olfactory neuroblastomas in females at 60 ppm and adenomas of the respiratory epithelium in males at all exposure levels. The relevance of these effects to humans has not been established. No carcinogenic effect was reported in a 2 -year feeding study in rats receiving naphthalene at 41 mg/ kg/ day.
Revision Number: 29
Revision Date: April 16, 2020 7 of 10 DIESEL FUEL No. 2 SDS : 6894
241
SECTION 12 ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION
ECOTOXICITY
A series of studies on the acute toxicity of 4 diesel fuel samples were conducted by one laboratory using water accommodated fractions. The range of effective ( EC50) or lethal concentrations ( LC50) expressed as loading rates were: This material is expected to be toxic to aquatic organisms and may cause long- term adverse effects in the aquatic environment.
72 hour( s) EC50: 2. 6-5 mg/ 1 (Selenastrum capricornutum) 96 hour( s) LC50: 21-10 mg/ I (Salmo gairdneri)
48 hour( s) EC50: 20-10 mg/ I (Daphnia magna)
MOBILITY
No data available.
PERSISTENCE AND DEGRADABILITY
This material is not expected to be readily biodegradable. On release to the environment the lighter components of diesel fuel will generally evaporate but depending on local environmental conditions ( temperature, wind, mixing or wave action, soil type, etc.) the remainder may become dispersed in the water column or absorbed to soil or sediment. Diesel fuel would not be expected to be readily biodegradable. In a modified Strum test ( OECD method 301B) approximately 40% biodegradation was recorded over 28 days. However, it has been shown that most hydrocarbon components of diesel fuel are degraded in soil in the presence of oxygen. Under anaerobic conditions, such as in anoxic sediments, rates ofbiodegradation are negligible.
The product has not been tested The statement has been derived from products of a similar structure and composition.
POTENTIAL TO BIOACCUMULATE
Bioconcentration Factor: No data available.
Octanol/ Water Partition Coefficient: No data available SECTION 13 DISPOSAL CONSIDERATIONS
Use material for its intended purpose or recycle ifpossible. This material, criteria of a ifit must be discarded, may meet the hazardous waste as defined by international, country, or local laws and regulations.
I SECTION 14 TRANSPORT INFORMATION
The description shown may not apply to all shipping situations. Consult 49CFR, or Regulations, for additional appropriate Dangerous Goods description requirements ( e.g., technical name) and mode - shipping requirements. specific or quantity -specific DOT Shipping Description: For
Closed Cup) >I= 23
packages with an Initial Boiling Point > 35 deg C and a Flash Point ( PM deg C but </= 60 GAS OIL, 3, III, MARINE
deg C: UN1202, GAS OIL, 3, III; OPTIONAL DISCLOSURE: UN1202, PM Closed Cup) >/=
POLLUTANT ( DIESEL FUEL) Optional disclosure per 49 CFR when Flash Point 38 deg C < 93 deg C per 49 173.50 ( III; NON -BULK PACKAGES ARE
f): UN1202, GAS OIL, COMBUSTIBLE LIQUID,
JURISDICTIONS
EXEMPTED FROM THE PROVISIONS OF 49 CFR IN USA
PM Closed Cup) > 60
Optional disclosure as a GHS Environmental Hazard/ Mrine Pollutant when Flash Point N. O. S.( DIESEL FUEL),
deg C: UN3082, ENVIRONMENTALLY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE, LIQUID, 9, III, MARINE POLLUTANT ( DIESEL FUEL) IMO/MDG Shipping Description: For packages with an Initial Boiling Point > 35 PM Closed Cup) >/= deg C and a Flash Point 23 deg C, </= 60
MARINE POLLUTANT ( DIESEL
deg C: UN1202, GAS OIL, 3, III, FLASH POINT SEE SECTION 5 OR 9, DISTILLATES, N. O. S. (
FUEL); OPTIONAL DISCLOSURE: UN1268, PETROLEUM DIESEL FUEL), 3, HI, FLASH POINT SEE SECTION 5 OR 9, MARINE Revision Number: 29
Revision Date: April 16, 2020 8 of 10 DIESEL FUEL No. 2 SDS : 6894
242
POLLUTANT ( DIESEL FUEL) For packages with a Flash Point ( PM Closed Cup) > 60 deg C: UN3082, ENVIRONMENTALLY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE, LIQUID, N. O. S. (DIESEL FUEL), 9, III, MARINE
POLLUTANT ( DIESEL FUEL)
ICAO/ATA Shipping Description: For packages with an Initial Boiling Point > 35 deg C and a Flash Point PM Closed Cup) >/= 23 deg C, 4= 60 deg C: UN1202, GAS OIL, 3, III For packages with a Flash Point (PM Closed Cup) > 60 deg C: UN3082, ENVIRONMENTALLY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE, LIQUID, N. O. S.
DIESEL FUEL), 9, III, MARINE POLLUTANT ( DIESEL FUEL)
Transport in bulk according to Annex II of MARPOL 73/8 and the IBC code:
Not applicable
I SECTION 15 REGULATORY INFORMATION
EPCRA 311/2 CATEGORIES:
Acute toxicity ( any route of exposure)
Aspiration Hazard
Carcinogenicity
Flammable ( gases, aerosols, liquids, or solids)
Skin Corrosion or Irritation
Specific target organ toxicity (single or repeated exposure) REGULATORY LISTS SEARCHED:
01- 1=IARC Group 1 03= EPCRA 313
01- 2A= IARC Group 2A 04-- A Proposition 65
01- 2B= IARC Group 2B 05= MA RTK
02= NTP Carcinogen 06= NJ RTK
07= PARTK
The following components ofthis material are found on the regulatory lists indicated.
Diesel Fuel No. 2
07 Naphthalene 01- 2B, 02, 04, 06
CHEMICAL INVENTORIES:
All components comply with the following chemical inventory requirements: DSL ( Canada), TSCA ( United States).
NEW JERSEY RTK CLASSIFICATION:
Under the New Jersey Right -to -Know Act L. 1983 Chapter 315 N. J.S.A. 34: 5A- 1et. seq., the product is to be identified as follows: DIESEL FUEL I SECTION 16 OTHER INFORMATION
NFPA RATINGS: Health: 1 FlammAbility: 2 Reactivity: 0
HMIS RATINGS: Health: 2* Flammability: 2 Reactivity: 0
0 -Least, 1 - Slight, 2 -Moderate, 3 -High, 4 -Extreme, PPE:- Personal Protection Equipment Index Chronic Effect recommendation, *- Indicator). These values are obtained using the guidelines or published evaluations National Fire prepared by the Protection Association ( NFPA) or the National Paint and Coating Association ( for HMIS ratings). 203447,
Additional Product Number( s): 203408, 203410, 203413, 203417, 203431, 203436, 203437, 203441, 203443, 203449, 203450, 203477990, 203480990, 203481990, 203482990, 203483990, 203484990, 203485990, 203486990, 203487990, 203488990, 203489990, 220122, 225114, 225115, 225150, 266176, 270000, 270005, 270006990, 270007990, 270008990, 270009990, 270010990, 270013990, 270014990, 270015990, 270016990, Revision Number: 29
Revision Date: April 16, 2020 9 of 10 DIESEL FUEL No. 2 SDS : 6894
243
270017990, 270030, 270031, 270032, 270033, 270034, 270040, 270041, 270042, 270043, 270044, 270045, 270046, 270047, 270048, 270049, 270050, 270051, 270052, 270053, 270054, 270058, 270059, 270060, 270062, 270063, 270064, 270065, 270068, 270069, 270070, 270081, 270082, 270083, 270084, 270085, 270086, 270087, 270088, 270107,
270089, 270090, 270091, 270094, 270095, 270096, 270100, 270101, 270102, 270103, 270104, 270105, 270106, 270108, 270109, 270110, 270111, 270112, 270113, 270114, 270115, 270116, 270117, 270118, 270119, 272013,
270120, 270121, 270122, 270123, 270124, 271006, 272006, 272007, 272008, 272009, 272010, 272011, 272012, 272602,
272093, 272102, 272126, 272129, 272130, 272131, 272152, 272185, 272190, 272195, 272593, 272601, 272693, 272793, 273003, 273030, 273053, 275000 REVISION STATEMENT: SECTION 03 - Composition information was modified. SECTION 04 - Immediate Health Effects - Inhalation information was modified. SECTION 07 - Precautionary Measures information was modified.
SECTION 08 - General Considerations information was modified.
SECTION 08 - Occupational Exposure Limit Table information was modified.
SECTION 09 - Physical/ Chemical Properties information was modified.
SECTION 11 - Additional Toxicology Information information was modified. SECTION 12 - Ecological Information information was modified.
SECTION 15 - Chemical Inventories information was modified.
SECTION 15 - New Jersey Right To Know information was modified. SECTION 15 - Regulatory Information information was deleted.
SECTION 15 - SARA 311 EPCRA Score information was modified.
Revision Date: April 16, 2020
ABBREVIATIONS THAT MAY HAVE BEEN USED IN THIS DOCUMENT: TLV - Threshold Limit Value STEL - Short- tem Exposure Limit
GHS - Globally Harmonized System
TWA - Time Weighted Average
PEL - Permissible Exposure Limit
ACGIH American
CAS - Chemical Abstract Service Number
Industrial
Conference of Governmental IMO/ DMIDG Hygienists Goods Code API - American Petroleum Institute SDS HMIS - Hazardous Materials Information System NFPA DOT - Department ofTransportation ( USA) NTP IARC - International Agency for Research on OSHA Cancer NCEL - Administration New Chemical Exposure Limit
SCBA - EPA - Environmental Self -Contained Breathing ApparatusProtection Agency International Maritime Dangerous
Safety Data Sheet
National Fire Protection Association ( USA)
National Toxicology Program ( USA)
Occupational Safety and Health
Prepared according to the 29 CFR 1910.200 (2012) by Chevron Energy Technology Company, 6001 Bollinger Canyon Road, San Ramon, CA 94583. I The above information is based on the data of which we are aware and is believed to be correct as of the date hereof. Since this information may be applied under conditions beyond our control and with which we may be unfamiliar and since data made available information, subsequent to the date hereof may suggest modifications of the we do not assume any responsibility for the results of its use. This information is furnished material for his ' articular ' u ' ose.
upon condition that the person receiving it shall make his own determination of the suitability of the Revision Number: 29
Revision Date: April 16, 2020 1 0 of 10 DIESEL FUEL No. 2 SDS : 6894
244
Safety Data Sheet Chevron
Or
SECTION 1 PRODUCT AND COMPANY IDENTIFICATION
Chevron and Texaco Unleaded Gasolines ( All Grades)
Product Use: Fuel
Synonyms: Automotive; Calco Mid -Grade Unleaded Gasoline; Calco Premium Gasoline; Calco Regular Unleaded Gasoline; CHEVRON and TEXACO MID -GRADE UNLEADED GASOLINES; CHEVRON and TEXACO PREMIUM UNLEADED GASOLINES; CHEVRON and TEXACO REGULAR UNLEADED GASOLINES; Chevron Mid -Grade Unleaded Gasoline; Chevron Plus Unleaded Gasoline; Chevron Premium Unleaded Gasoline; Chevron Regular Unleaded Gasoline; Chevron Supreme Plus Unleaded Gasoline; Chevron Supreme Unleaded Gasoline; Chevron UL/ CQ Gasoline; GASOLINE ( GENERIC); Gasolines; Texaco Power Plus Gasoline; Texaco Power Premium Unleaded Gasoline; Texaco Unleaded Gasoline; UNLEADED GASOLINE FOR EXPORT
Company Identification
Chevron Products Company
6001 Bollinger Canyon Rd.
San Ramon, CA 94583
United States ofAmerica
Transportation Emergency Response
CHEMTREC: (800) 424- 9300 or (703) 527- 3887
Health Emergency
Chevron Emergency & Information Center: Located in the USA. International collect calls accepted. ( 800) 231- 0623 or (510) 231- 0623
Product Information
Product Information: ( 800) 582- 3835
SDS Requests: lubemsds@chevron. com
SECTION 2 HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION
CLASSIFICATION: Flammable liquid: Category 1. Aspiration toxicant: Category 1. Carcinogen: Category 1A. Target organ toxicant (repeated exposure): Category 1. Eye irritation: Category 2A. Germ Ce11 Mutagen:
Category 1B. Skin irritation: Category 2. Reproductive toxicant ( developmental): Category 2. Target organ toxicant (central nervous system): Category 3. Acute aquatic toxicant: Category 2. Chronic aquatic toxicant:
Category 2.
Signal Word: Danger
Physical Hazards: Extremely flammable liquid and vapor.
Revision Number: 0
Revision Date: March 13, 2020
1 of 13 Chevron and Texaco Unleaded Gasolines
All Grades)
SDS : 43251
245
Health Hazards: May be fatal if swallowed and enters airways. May cause genetic defects. May cause cancer.
Causes skin irritation. Causes serious eye irritation. Suspected of damaging the unborn child. May cause drowsiness or dizziness.
Target Organs: Causes damage to organs ( Blood/lood Forming Organs) through prolonged or repeated exposure.
Environmental Hazards: Toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effects.
PRECAUTIONARY STATEMENTS:
General: Keep out of reach of children. Read label before use.
Prevention: Obtain special instructions before use. Do not handle until all safety precautions have been read and understood. Keep away from heat/ sparks/ open flames/ hot surfaces. — No smoking. Ground/ bnd container and receiving equipment. Use only non -sparking tools. Take precautionary measures against static discharge. Keep container tightly closed. Use explosion -proof electrical/ ventilating/ lighting/ equipment. Do not breathe dust/ fme/ gas/ mist/ vapours/ spray. Use only outdoors or in a well -ventilated area. Wear protective gloves/ protective clothing/ eye protection/ faceprotection. Use personal protective equipment as required. Do not eat, drink or smoke when using this product. Wash thoroughly after handling. Avoid release to the environment.
Response: In case offire: Use media specified in the SDS to extinguish. IF exposed or concerned: Get medical advice/ attention. IF INHALED: Call a poison center ordoctor/ physician ifyou feel unwell. Remove person to fresh air and keep comfortable for breathing. IF IN EYES: Rinse cautiously with water for several minutes. Remove contact lenses, ifpresent and easy to do. Continue rinsing. If eye irritation persists: Get medical advice/ attention. IF ON SKIN ( orhair): Take off immediately all contaminated clothing and wash it before reuse. Rinse skin with water/ shower. Ifskin irritation occurs: Get medical advice/ attention. W SWALLOWED: Immediately call a POISON CENTER or doctor/ physician. Do NOT induce vomiting. Specific treatment ( see Notes to Physician on this label). Collect spillage.
Storage: Store in a well -ventilated place. Keep cool. Keep container tightly closed. Store Locked up.
Disposal: Dispose of contents/ container in accordance with applicable local/ regional/ national/ international regulations.
HAZARDS NOT OTHERWISE CLASSIFIED: Not Applicable
I SECTION 3 COMPOSmON/ INFORMATION ON INGREDIENTS
Hazardous Substance( s) or Complex Substance( s) required for disclosure
COMPONENTS
Gasoline
CAS NUMBER AMOUNT
86290-1- 5 100 % volume
Hazardous Constituents r_-.
COMPONENTS CAS NUMBER AMOUNT
Toluene 108- 88- 3 1 - 35 % volume
Xylene 1330- 2- 7 1- 15 % volume
Pentane isomers ( pentanes) MIXTURE 1 - 13 % volume
Butane 106- 97- 8 1 - 12 % volume
Ethanol 64- 17- 5 0 - 10 % volume
Benzene 71- 43- 2 0. 1 - 5 % volume
Hexane 110- 54- 3 1 - 5 % volume
Heptane 142- 82- 5 1 - 4 %volume
Cyclohexane 110- 82- 7 1 - 3 % volume
Ethylbenzene 100- 41- 0. 1 - 3 % volume
Naphthalene 91- 20- 3 0. 1 - 2 % volume
Methylcyclohexane 108- 87- 2 1 - 2 % volume
Motor gasoline is considered a mixture by EPA under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). The refinery Revision Number: 0
Revision Date: Match 13, 2020
2 of 13 Chevron and Texaco Unleaded Gasolines
AD Grades)
SDS : 43251
246
streams used to blend motor gasoline are all on the TSCA Chemical Substances Inventory. The appropriate CAS number for refinery blended motor gasoline is 86290-1- 5. The product specifications of motor gasoline sold in area will your depend on applicable Federal and State regulations.
I SECTION 4 FIRST AID MEASURES
Description of first aid measures
Eye: Flush eyes with water immediately while holding the eyelids open. Remove contact lenses, ifworn, after initial flushing, and continue flushing for at least 15 minutes. Get immediate medical attention. Skin: Wash skin with water immediately and remove contaminated clothing and shoes. Get medical attention if any symptoms develop. To remove the material from skin, use soap and water. Discard contaminated and shoes or clothing thoroughly clean before reuse.
Ingestion: If swallowed, get immediate medical attention. Do not induce mouth to an
vomiting. Never give anything by unconscious person.
Inhalation: Move the exposed person to fresh air. If not breathing, give artificial respiration. If breathing is difficult, give oxygen. Get medical attention ifbreathing difficulties continue or if any other symptoms develop.
Most important symptoms and effects, both acute and delayed
IMMEDIATE HEALTH EF' F'CTS
Eye: Contact with the eyes causes severe irritation. Symptoms may include pain, tearing, reddening, swelling and impaired vision.
Skin: Contact with i
the skin causes irritation. Skin contact may cause drying or defatting ofthe skin. Symptoms may include pain, itching, discoloration, swelling, and blistering. Contact with the skin is not expected to cause an allergic skin response.
Ingestion: Highly toxic; may be fatal if swallowed. Because of its low viscosity, this material can directly enter the lungs, if swallowed, or if subsequently vomited. Once in the lungs it is very difficult to remove and can cause severe injury or death. May be irritating to mouth, throat, and stomach. Symptoms may include pain, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea.
Inhalation: Excessive or prolonged breathing of this material may cause central nervous system effects. Central nervous system effects may include headache, dizziness, nausea, vomiting, weakness, loss of coordination, blurred vision, drowsiness, confusion, or disorientation. At extreme exposures, central nervous system effects may include respiratory depression, tremors or convulsions, loss of consciousness, coma or death.
DELAYED OR OTHER HEALTH EF' FECTS:
Reproduction and Birth Defects: Contains material that may cause harm to the unborn child ifinhaled above the recommended exposure limit.
Cancer: Prolonged or repeated exposure to this material may cause cancer. Gasoline has been classified as a Group 2B carcinogen ( possibly carcinogenic to humans) by the International Agency for Research on Cancer IARC).
Whole gasoline exhaust has been classified as a Group 2B carcinogen ( possibly carcinogenic to humans) by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC).
Contains benzene, which has been classified as a carcinogen by the National Toxicology Program ( NTP) and a Group 1 carcinogen ( carcinogenic to humans) by the International Agency for Research on Cancer ( IARC). Contains the
naphthalene, which has been classified as a Group 2B carcinogen ( possibly carcinogenic to humans) by International Agency for Research on Cancer ( IARC). Contains ethylbenzene which has been classified as a Group 2B carcinogen ( possibly carcinogenic to humans) by the International Agency for Research on Cancer IARC).
Genetic Toxicity: Contains material that may cause heritable genetic damage based on animal data.
Target Organs: Contains material that may cause damage to the following organ( s) following repeated inhalation at concentrations above the recommended exposure limit: BloodBlood Forming Organs See Section 11 for additional information. Risk depends on duration and level of exposure.
Revision Number: 0
Revision Date: March 13, 2020 3 of 13 Chevron and Texaco Unleaded Gasolines All Grades)
SDS : 43251
247
Indication of any immediate medical attention and special treatment needed Note to Physicians: Ingestion ofthis product or subsequent vomiting may result in aspiration of light hydrocarbon liquid, which may cause pneumonitis.
SECTION 5 FIRE FIGHTING MEASURES
Unusual
EXTINGUISHING
Fire
MEDIA: Dry Chemical, CO2, Aqueous Film Forming Foam ( AFFF) or alcohol resistant foam. Hazards: See Section 7 for proper handling and storage.
PROTECTION OF FIRE FIGHTERS:
Fire Fighting Instructions: For fires involving this material, do not enter any enclosed or confined fire without space proper protective equipment, including self- contained breathing apparatus. Combustion Products: Highly dependent on combustion conditions. A complex mixture ofairborne solids, liquids, and gases including carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and unidentified when organic compounds will be evolved this material undergoes combustion.
SECTION 6 ACCIDENTAL RELEASE MEASURES I
Protective Measures: Eliminate all sources of ignition in the vicinity of the spill or released vapor. material If this is released into the work area, evacuate the area indicator. immediately. Monitor area with combustible gas Spill Management: Stop the source of the releace if you can do it without risk. Contain release to further contamination of prevent soil, surface water or groundwater. Clean precautions in up spill as soon as possible, observing Exposure Controls/ Personal Protection. Use appropriate techniques such as absorbent materials or applying non- combustible pumping. All equipment used when handling the product must be grounded A vapor suppressing foam may be used to reduce vapors. Use clean non - Where sparking tools to collect absorbed material. feasible and appropriate, remove contaminated soil. Place contaminated materials in and disposable containers dispose of in a manner consistent with applicable regulations. 8802
Reporting:
as
Report spills to local authorities and/ orthe U. S. Coast Guards National Response Center at (800) 424- appropriate or required.
SECTION 7 HANDLING AND STORAGE
General Handling Information: Avoid contaminating soil or releasing this material into sewage and systems and bodies of water. drainage Precautionary Measures: This product presents an extreme fire hazard. low Liquid very quickly evaporates, even at temperatures, and forms vapor (fumes) which can catch fire and burn with explosive violence. Invisible spreads easily and can be set on vapor and switches. Never
fire by many sources such as pilot lights, welding equipment, and electrical motors siphon gasoline by mouth.
Do not store in
LABEL. Use
open or unlabeled containers. READ AND OBSERVE ALL PRECAUTIONS ON PRODUCT only as a motor fuel. Do not use for not get in cleaning, pressure appliance fuel, or any other such use. Do eyes, on skin, or on clothing. Do not taste or swallow. Do not breathe vapor or fumes. Wash thoroughly after handling. Keep out of the reach of children. Static Hazard: Improper filling of portable gasoline containers creates approved and danger of fire. Only dispense gasoline into properly labeled gasoline containers. Always place portable containers on the pump nozzle is in ground. Be sure contact with the container while filling. Do not use a nozzle' slock - portable containers that are open device. Do not fill inside a vehicle or truck/railer bed.
Electrostatic charge may accumulate and create a hazardous condition when this hazard, handling this material. To minimize bonding and grounding may be operations which necessary but may not, by themselves, be sufficient. Review all have the potential ofgenerating and accumulating an electrostatic atmosphere ( charge and/ or a flammable including tank and container filling, splash filling, tank cleaning, sampling, gauging, switch filtering, mixing, agitation, and loading, vacuum truck operations) and use appropriate mitigating procedures.
Revision Number: 0
Revision Date: March 13, 2020 4 of 13 Chevron and Texaco Unleaded Gasolines Ali Grades)
SDS : 43251
248
Container Warnings: Container is not designed to contain pressure. Do not use pressure to may empty container or it rupture with dangerous. Do not
explosive force. Empty containers retain product residue ( solid, liquid, and/ or vapor) and can be pressurize, cut, weld, braze, solder, drill, grind, or expose such containers to heat, flame, sparks, static electricity, or other sources of ignition. They may explode and cause should be injury completely din or death. Empty containers P Yradrained, properly closed, and promptly returned to a drum reconditioner or properly. disposed of STORE
General
ONLY
Storage
IN
Information:
WELL
DO NOT USE OR STORE near heat, sparks, flames, or hot surfaces . USE AND VENTILATED AREA. Keep container closed when not in use.
I SECTION 8 EXPOSURE CONTROLS/ PERSONAL PROTECTION
GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS:
substances
Consider the
in
potential
the work
hazards of this material ( see Section 2), applicable exposure limits, job activities, and other place when designing engineering controls and selecting personal protective equipment. If engineering controls or work practices are not adequate to prevent exposure to harmful levels ofthis material, personal the protective equipment listed below is recommended. The user should read and understand all and limitations instructions supplied with the equipment since protection is circumstances. usually provided for a limited time or under certain ENGINEERING CONTROLS:
Use process enclosures, local exhaust ventilation, or other engineering controls to control airborne levels below the recommended exposure limits.
PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT
Eye/ Face Protection: Wear protective equipment to
include prevent eye contact. Selection ofprotective equipment may safety glasses, chemical goggles, face shields, or a combination conducted. depending on the work operations
Skin Protection: Wear protective clothing to prevent skin contact. Selection ofprotective clothing may include gloves, apron, boots, and complete facial protection depending on operations conducted. Suggested materials for protective Polyurethane,
gloves
Viton.
include: Chlorinated Polyethylene ( or Chlorosulfonated Polyethylene), Nitrile Rubber, Respiratory Protection: Determine if airborne concentrations are below the recommended limits for occupational exposure jurisdiction of use. If airbome concentrations are above the respirator that acceptable limits, wear an approved
Vapors.
provides adequate protection from this material, such as: Air -Purifying Respirator for Organic When used as a
fuel, this material can produce carbon monoxide in the exhaust. Determine if airborne concentrations are below the occupational exposure limit for carbon monoxide. Ifnot, wear an approved positive - pressure air -supplying respirator.
Use a positive pressure air -supplying respirator in circumstances where air - adequate protection. purifying respirators may not provide Occupational Exposure Limits•
Component Agency Form TWA STEL
Gasoline Ceiling Notation
ACGIH
Gasoline
Vapor 300 ppm 500 ppm A3
ACGIH 300 ppm 500 ppm Toluene ACGIH 20 ppm
Toluene OSHA Z- 2 200 ppm 300 ppm Xylene ACGIH 100 ppm 150 ppm Xylene OSHA Z- 1 435 mg/3 Butane ACGIH Ethanol
1000 ppm
ACGIH 1000 ppm A4 Ethanol OSHA Z- 1 1900 mg/3
nzene ACGIH Vapor 5 ppm 2. 5ppm
Revision Number: 0
Revision Date: March I3, 2020 5 of 13 Chevron and Texaco Unleaded Gasoline• All Grades)
SDS : 43251
249
Benzene
Benzene
ACGIH 5 ppm 2. 5 ppm Skin
CVX Vapor 0. 5 ppm 2. 5 ppm Benzene OSHA SRS 1 ppm 5 ppm Benzene Hexane
OSHA Z- 2 10 ppm 25 ppm
Hexane
ACGIH 50 ppm Skin OSHA Z -I 1800 mg/3 Heptane ACGIH 400 ppm 500 ppm Heptane OSHA Z -I 2000 mg/3 Cyclohexane ACGIH 100 ppm Cyclohexane OSHA Z- 1 1050 mg/3 Ethylbenzene ACGIH Vapor 100 ppm Ethylbenzene ACGIH 20 ppm Ethylbenzene OSHA Z- 1 435 mg/3 Naphthalene ACGIH Vapor 10 ppm 15 ppm A4 Skin Naphthalene ACGIH 10 ppm Skin Naphthalene OSHA Z- 1 50 mg/3 Methylcyclohexane ACGIH 400 ppm
Methylcyclohexane OSHA Z- 1 2000 mg/3 Consult local anthnrit .. f ...,.....,....-.,.....--'---- SECTION 9 PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES
Attention: the data below are typical values and do not constitute a specification.
Color: Colorless to yellow
Physical State: Liquid
Odor: Petroleum odor
Odor Threshold: No data available
pH: Not Applicable
Vapor Pressure: 5 psi - 15. 50 psi (Typical) @ 37. 8 °C ( 100 ° F) Vapor Density ( Air = 1): 3 - 4 ( Typical)
Initial Boiling Point: 27.°C (81° F) - 52. 8°C (127° F) ( Typical) Solubility: Negligible
Freezing Point: Not Applicable
Melting Point: Not Applicable
Specific Gravity: 0. 70 g/ ml - 0. 80 g/ ml @ 15. 6°C (60. 1°F) ( Typical) Viscosity: < 1 SUS @ 37. 8°C (100° F)
Evaporation Rate: No data available
Decomposition temperature: No data available
Octanol/ Water Partition Coefficient: 2 - 7
FLAMMABLE PROPERTIES:
Flammability ( solid, gas): No Data Available
Flashpoint: ( Tagliabue Closed Cup ASTM D56) < -45 ° C (< - 49 ° F) Autoignition: > 280 ° C (> 536 °F)
Flammability (Explosive) Limits (% by volume in air): Lower: 1. 4 Upper: 7. 6 SECTION 10 STABILITY AND REACTIVITY
Reactivity: May react with strong acids or strong oxidizing agents, such as chlorates, nitrates, peroxides, etc. Chemical Stability: This material is considered stable under normal ambient and anticipated storage and handling conditions oftemperature and pressure.
Incompatibility With Other Materials: Not applicable
Revision Number: 0
Revision Date: March 13, 2020 6 of 13 Chevron and Texaco Unleaded Gasolines MI Grades)
SDS : 43251
250
Hazardous Decomposition Products: None known ( None expected) Hazardous Polymerization: Hazardous polymerization will not occur.
I SECTION 11 TOXICOLOGICAL INFORMATION
Information on toxicological effects
Serious Eye Damage/ Irritation: The eye irritation hazard is based on evaluation of data for product components.
Skin Corrosion/ Irritation: For a 4 -hour exposure, the Primary Irritation Index (PII) in rabbits is: 4. 8/.0.
Skin Sensitization: This material did not cause skin sensitization reactions in a Buehler guinea pig test.
Acute Dermal Toxicity: LD50: >3. 75 g/ kg (rabbit).
Acute Oral Toxicity: LD50: >5 ml/ kg (rat).
Acute Inhalation Toxicity: 4 hour( s) LD50: >20000 mg/3 (rat). Acute Toxicity Estimate: Not Determined Germ Cell Mutagenicity: The hazard evaluation is based on data for components or a similar material.
Carcinogenicity: The hazard evaluation is based on data for classified as
components or a similar material. Gasoline has been a Group 2B Cancer (
carcinogen ( possibly carcinogenic to humans) by the International Agency for Research on IARC).
Whole gasoline exhaust has been classified as a Group 2B carcinogen ( possibly carcinogenic to humans) by the International Agency for Research on Cancer ( IARC).
Contains benzene, which has been classified as a carcinogen by the National Toxicology Program ( NTP) and a Group 1 carcinogen ( carcinogenic to humans) by the International Agency for Research on Cancer ( Contains IARC). naphthalene, which has been classified as a Group 2B the International carcinogen ( possibly carcinogenic to humans) by Agency for Research on Cancer ( IARC). Contains ethylbenzene which has been classified as a Group 2B carcinogen ( possibly carcinogenic to humans) by the International Agency for Research on Cancer IARC).
Reproductive Toxicity: The hazard evaluation is based on data for components or a similar material.
Specific Target Organ Toxicity - Single Exposure: The hazard evaluation is based on data for components or a similar material.
Specific Target Organ Toxicity - Repeated Exposure: The hazard evaluation is based on data for components or a similar material.
ADDITIONAL TOXICOLOGY INFORMATION:
Gasolines are highly volatile and can produce significant concentrations of vapor at ambient Gasoline temperatures. vapor is heavier than air and at high concentrations may accumulate in confined spaces to present both safety and health hazards. When vapor exposures are low, or short duration and infrequent, such as during refueling and tanker loading/ unloading, neither total hydrocarbon nor components such as benzene are likely to result in any adverse health effects. In situations such as accidents or spills where exposure to gasoline vapor is potentially high, attention should be paid to potential toxic effects of specific components. Information about specific components in on
gasoline can be found in Sections 2/3, 8 and 15 ofthis MSDS. More detailed information the health hazards of specific gasoline components can be obtained Center ( calling the Chevron Emergency Information
see Section 1 for phone numbers).
Pathological misuse of solvents and gasoline, involving repeated and prolonged exposure to high concentrations of vapor is a significant exposure on which there are many reports in the medical literature. As with other solvents, persistent abuse involving repeated and prolonged exposures to high concentrations of vapor has been reported to Revision Number: 0
Revision Date: March 13, 2020 7 of 13 Chevron and Texaco Unleaded Gasolines All Grades)
SDS : 43251
251
result in central nervous system damage and eventually, death. In a study in which ten human volunteers were exposed for 30 minutes to approximately 200, 500 or 1000 ppm concentrations of gasoline vapor, irritation ofthe eyes was the only significant effect observed, based on both subjective and objective assessments. Lifetime inhalation of wholly vaporized unleaded gasoline at 2056 female mice ppm has caused increased liver tumors in and kidney cancer in male rats. In their 1988 review of carcinogenic risk from gasoline, The International Agency for Research on Cancer ( IARC) noted that, because published epidemiology studies did not include included
any exposure data, only occupations where gasoline exposure may have occurred were reviewed. These gasoline service station attendants and automobile mechanics. IARC also noted that there was no opportunity to separate effects ofcombustion products from those ofgasoline itself. Although IARC allocated gasoline a final overall classification of Group 2B, i.e. evidence in possibly carcinogenic to humans, this was based on limited experimental animals plus supporting evidence including the presence in actual gasoline ofbenzene. The evidence for carcinogenicity in humans was considered inadequate. MUTAGENICITY: Gasoline was not mutagenic, with or without activation, in the Ames assay ( Salmonella typhimurium), Saccharamyces cerevisesae, or mouse lymphoma assays. In addition, point mutations were not induced in human lymphocytes. Gasoline was not mutagenic when tested in the mouse dominant lethal Administration of assay. gasoline to rats did not cause chomosomal aberrations in their bone marrow cells. EPIDEMIOLOGY: To explore the health effects of workers potentially exposed to and distribution sectors ofthe gasoline vapors in the marketing petroleum industry, the American Petroleum Institute study ( Publication sponsored a cohort mortality 4555), a nested case -control study ( Publication 4551), and an exposure assessment Publication study 4552). Histories of employees from four
exposure to gasoline were reconstructed for cohort of more than 18, 000 study indicated that there
companies
was no
for the time period between 1946 and 1985. The results ofthe cohort mortality increased mortality from either kidney cancer or leukemia marine among marketing and distribution employees who were exposed to gasoline in the petroleum industry, when compared pared to the general population. More importantly, based on internal from kidney cancer or leukemia
comparisons, there was no association between mortality and various indices of gasoline exposure. In particular, neither duration of employment, duration ofexposure, age at first exposure, year of first exposure, job category, cumulative exposure, frequency ofpeak exposure, nor average intensity ofexposure had any effect on kidney cancer or leukemia mortality. The results of the nested case -control study confirmed the findings of the original cohort study. That is, exposure to gasoline at the levels experienced by this cohort of distribution workers is not a for significant risk factor leukemia ( all cell types), acute myeloid leukemia, kidney cancer ormultiple myeloma.
This product contains ethylbenzene.
BIRTH DEFECTS AND REPRODUCTION: Ethylbenzene is not expected to cause birth defects or other and
developmental
mice which
effects based on well- conducted studies in rabbits and rats sponsored by NIOSH. Other studies in rats reported urinary tract malformations have many deficiencies and have limited usefulness in evaluating human risk. Reproductive effects are not expected based on a NIOSH study of fertility, effects and lack of observed for sperm counts and motility, estrous cycle and pathology of repeated exposures. HEARING: reproductive organs following Statistically significant losses in outer hair cells (OHCs) were observed in rats exposed to >= 200 ppm ethylbenzene, 6 hours/ day, 6 days/ week for 13 weeks, after an 8 -week Following recovery period. longer exposure, inner hair cells losses were also observed in rats exposed to r— 600 but only ppm ethylbenzene, occasionally in rats exposed to 400 200
ppm. The Lowest Observed Adverse Effect Level in rats ( LOAEL) was ppm for losses of OHCs. Guinea pigs exposed to ethylbenzene at 2, 500 ppm, 6 hours/ day for 5 show days did not auditory deficits or losses in OHCs. The concentration of ethylbenzene used in the JP -8 study was approximately 10 ppm. GENETIC TOXICITY: Ethylbenzene tested Chinese Hamster negative in the bacterial mutation test, Ovary (CHO) cell in vitro assay, sister chromatid exchange assay and an unscheduled DNA synthesis assay. Conflicting results have been reported for the mouse lymphoma cell were assay. Increased micronuclei reported in an in vitro Syrian hamster embryo cell were
assay; however, two in vivo micronuclei studies in mice negative. In Syrian hamster embryo cells in vitro, cell transformation was observed at 7 days of but not at 24 incubation hours. Based on these results, ethylbenzene is not expected to be mutagenic or CARCINOGENICITY: clastogenic. In studies conducted by the National Toxicology Program, rats and mice were exposed to ethylbenzene at 25, 250 and 750 ppm for six hours per day, five days per week for 103 weeks. In rats exposed to 750 ppm, the incidence of kidney tubule hyperplasia and tumors was increased. Testicular tumors develop spontaneously in nearly all rats if allowed to complete their natural life span; in this study, the tumors development of these appeared to be enhanced in male rats exposed to 750 ppm. In mice, the incidences of lung tumors in males Revision Number: 0
Revision Date: March 13, 2020 8 of 13 Chevron and Texaco Unleaded Gasolines Ali Grades)
SDS : 43251
252
and liver tumors in females exposed to 750 ppm were increased as compared to control mice but were within the range of incidences observed historically in control mice. Other liver effects were observed in male mice to 250 and exposed 750 ppm. The incidences of hyperplasia were increased in the pituitary gland in female mice at 250 and 750 ppm and in the thyroid in male and female mice at 750 ppm.
This product contains toluene.
GENERAL TOXICITY: The primary effects of exposure to toluene in animals and humans are on the central nervous system. Solvent abusers, who typically inhale high concentrations ( thousands ofppm) for brief periods of time, in addition to experiencing respiratory tract irritation, often suffer permanent central nervous system effects that include tremors, staggered gait, impaired speech, hearing and vision loss, and changes in brain tissue. Death in some solvent abusers has been attributed to cardiac arrhythmias, which appear to be have been triggered by epinephrine acting on solvent sensitized cardiac tissue. Although liver and kidney effects have been seen in some solvent abusers, results of animal testing with toluene do not support these as HEARING: primary target organs. Humans who were occupationally exposed to concentrations of toluene as low as 100 ppm for long periods of time have experienced hearing deficits. Hearing loss, as demonstrated using behavioral and electrophysiological testing as well as by observation of structural damage to cochlear hair cells, occurred in experimental animals exposed to toluene. It also appears that toluene exposure and noise may interact to produce hearing deficits.
COLOR VISION: In a
single study of workers exposed to toluene at levels under 50 ppm, small decreases in the ability to discriminate colors in the blue -yellow range have been reported for female workers. This effect, which should be investigated further, is very subtle and would not likely have been noticed by the people tested. REPRODUCTIVE/ DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICITY: Toluene may also cause mental and/ or growth retardation in the children of female solvent abusers who directly inhale toluene (usually at thousands of ppm) when they are pregnant. Toluene caused growth retardation in rats and rabbits when administered at doses that were toxic to the mothers. In rats, concentrations of up to 5000 ppm did not cause birth defects. No effects were observed in the offspring at doses that did not intoxicate the pregnant animals. The exposure level at which no effects were seen ( No Observed Effect Level, NOEL) is 750 ppm in the rat and 500 ppm in the rabbit.
This product contains xylene.
ACUTE TOXICITY: The primary effects of exposure to xylene in animals and humans are on the central nervous system. In addition, insome individuals, xylene exposure can sensitize cardiac tissue to epinephrine which may precipitate fatal ventricular fibrillation. DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICITY: Xylene has been reported to cause developmental toxicity in rats and mice exposed by inhalation during pregnancy. The effects noted consisted of delayed development and minor skeletal variations. In addition, when pregnant mice were exposed by ingestion to a level that killed nearly one- third of the test group, lethality ( resorptions) and malformations ( occurred. Since primarily cleft palate) xylene can cross the placenta, it may be appropriate to GENETIC prevent exposure during pregnancy. TOXICITY/ CARCINOGEIHIICITY: Xylene was not genotoxic in several mutagenicity testing assays including the Ames test. In a cancer study sponsored by the National Toxicology Program ( NTP), technical grade xylene gave no evidence of carcinogenicity in rats or mice dosed daily for two have been years. HEARING: Mixed xylenes shown to cause measurable hearing loss in rats exposed to 800 ppm in the air for 14 hours per day for six weeks. Exposure to 1450 ppm xylene for 8 hours caused hearing loss while exposure to 1700 ppm for 4 hours did not. Although no information is available for lower concentrations, other chemicals that cause hearing loss in rats at relatively high concentrations do not cause hearing loss in rats at low concentrations. Worker exposure to at the xylenes permissible exposure limit ( 100 ppm, time -weighted average) is not expected to cause hearing loss.
This product contains naphthalene.
GENERAL TOXICITY: Exposure to naphthalene has been reported to cause methemoglobinemia and/ or hemolytic anemia, especially in humans deficient in the enzyme glucose - 6 - animals phosphate dehydrogenase. Laboratory given repeated oral doses of naphthalene have developed cataracts. REPRODUCTIVE TOXICITY AND BIRTH DEFECTS: Naphthalene did not cause birth defects when administered orally to rabbits, rats, and mice during pregnancy, but slightly reduced litter size in mice at dose levels that were lethal to the pregnant females. Naphthalene has been reported to cross the human placenta. GENETIC TOXICITY: Naphthalene caused chromosome aberrations and sister chromatid exchanges in Chinese hamster ovary cells, but was not a mutagen in several other in -vitro tests. CARCINOGENICITY: In a study conducted by the National Toxicology Program ( NTP), Revision Number: 0
Revision Date: March 13, 2020 9 of 13 Chevron and Texaco Unleaded Gasolines AII Grades)
SDS : 43251
253
mice exposed to 10 or 30 ppm ofnaphthalene by inhalation daily for two years had chronic inflammation ofthe nose and lungs and increased incidences of metaplasia in those tissues. The incidence of benign lung tumors alveolar/ bronchiolar adenomas) was significantly increased in the high -dose female group but not in the male groups. In another two- year inhalation study conducted by NTP, exposure of rats to 10, 30, and 60 caused ppm naphthalene increases in the incidences of a variety ofnonneoplastic lesions in the nose. Increases in nasal tumors were seen in both sexes, including olfactory neuroblastomas in females at 60 ppm and adenomas ofthe respiratory epithelium in males at all No
exposure levels. The relevance of these effects to humans has not been established. carcinogenic effect was reported in a 2 -year feeding study in rats receiving naphthalene at 41 mg/ kg/ day.
This product contains cyclohexane.
Cyclohexane primarily affects the central nervous systems of laboratory animals and humans. Acute or inhalation of prolonged cyclohexane at levels below the recommended exposure limits does not result in toxic effects while acute exposures to levels above these recommended limits can cause reversible central nervous system depression. Prolonged exposures of laboratory animals to high levels ( up to low thousands ofparts per million) have also caused reversible effects which included hyperactivity, diminished response to stimuli, and adaptive liver changes while very high levels (high thousands ofparts per million) were fatal. No developmental effects were seen in rats or rabbits following exposures of up to 7000 postnatal
ppm cyclohexane. No reproductive effects occurred in rats, although pup growth was reduced at 7000 ppm in a similar manner as observed in the parental animals. Cyclohexane has not been shown to be mutagenic in several in vitro and in vivo assays and has not produced tumors in several dermal application long- term bioassays. Based on these results and the lack ofany mutagenic or genotoxic metabolites, cyclohexane is not expected to be mutagenic or genotoxic. Following dermal exposure, cyclohexane is rapidly absorbed, metabolized, anexcreted.
This product contains ethanol (ethyl alcohol).
Chronic ingestion of ethanol can damage the liver, nervous system and heart. Chronic heavy consumption of alcoholic beverages has been associated with an increased risk of cancer. Ingestion ofethanol during pregnancy cause can human birth defects such as fetal alcohol syndrome.
This product contains butane.
An atmospheric concentration of 100, 00 ppm ( 10%) butane is not noticeably irritating to the eyes, nose or respiratory tract, but will produce slight dizziness in a few minutes ofexposure. No chronic been systemic effect has reported from occupational exposure.
This product contains benzene.
GENETIC TOXICITY/ CANCER: Repeated or prolonged breathing of benzene vapor has been associated with the development of chromosomal damage in experimental animals and various blood diseases in humans aplastic anemia to leukemia ( ranging from a form ofcane). All ofthese diseases can be fatal. In some individuals, benzene exposure can sensitize cardiac tissue to
REPRODUCTIVE/
epinephrine which may precipitate fatal ventricular fibrillation. DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICITY: No birth defects have been shown to occur in pregnant laboratory animals exposed to doses not toxic to the mother. However, some evidence of fetal toxicity such as human
delayed physical development has been seen at such levels. The available information on the effects of benzene on pregnancies is OCCUPATIONAL:
inadequate but it has been established that benzene can cross the human placenta The OSHA Benzene Standard ( 29 CFR 1910. 1028) contains detailed requirements for exposure monitoring, training, respiratory protection and medical surveillance triggered by the OSHA Standard exposure level. Refer to the before using this product.
This product contains n -hexane.
TARGET ORGAN TOXICITY: Prolonged or repeated ingestion, skin contact or breathing of has been vapors of n -hexane shown to cause peripheral neuropathy. Recovery ranges from no recovery to upon the severity of the nerve
complete recovery depending damage. Exposure to 1000
to cause
ppm n -hexane for 18 hr/ day for 61 days has been shown testicular damage in rats. However, when rats were exposed to higher concentrations for shorter periods ( 10, 000 daily ppm for 6 h/ day, 5 days/ wkfor 13 weeks), no testicular lesions were seen. CARCINOGENICITY: Chronic exposure to commercial hexane ( 52% n -hexane) at a concentration of was not carcinogenic to rats or to male 9000ppm No
mice, but did result in an increased incidence of liver tumors in female mice. carcinogenic effects were observed in female mice exposed to 900 or 3000 ppm hexane or in male mice. The Revision Number: 0
Revision Date: March 13, 2020 10 of 13 Chevron and Texaco Unleaded Gasolines All Grades)
SDS : 43251
254
relevance for humans of these hexane -induced mouse liver tumors is questionable. GENETIC TOXICITY: n -Hexane caused chromosome aberrations in bone marrow ofrats, but was negative in the AMES and mouse lymphoma tests.
SECTION 12 ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION
ECOTOXICITY
Gasoline studies have been conducted in the laboratory under a variety of test conditions with a
range offish and invertebrate species. An even more extensive database is available on the aquatic toxicity of individual aromatic constituents. The majority of published studies do not identify the type of gasoline evaluated, or even provide distinguishing characteristics such as aromatic content or presence of lead alkyls. As a result, comparison of results among studies using open and closed vessels, different ages and species oftest animals and different gasoline types, is difficult.
The bulk ofthe available literature on gasoline relates to the environmental impact of monoaromatic ( BTEX) and diaromatic ( naphthalene, methylnaphthalenes) constituents. In general, non - oxygenated gasoline exhibits some short- tem toxicity to freshwater and marine organisms, especially under closed vessel or flow -through exposure conditions in the laboratory. The components which are the most prominent in the water soluble fraction and cause aquatic toxicity, are also highly volatile and can be readily biodegraded by microorganisms.
This material is expected to be toxic to aquatic organisms and may cause long- term adverse effects in the aquatic environment. 48 hour( s) LC50: 3. 0 mg/ I (Daphnia magna)
96 hour( s) LC50: 1. 8 mg/ 1 (Mysidopsis bahia)
96 hour( s) LC50: 8. 3 mg/ I (Cyprinodon variegatus)
96 hour( s) LC50: 2. 7 mg/ I (Oncorhynchus mykiss)
MOBILITY
No data available.
PERSISTENCE AND DEGRADABILITY
This material is expected to be readily biodegradable. Following spillage, the more volatile will be components ofgasoline rapidly lost, with concurrent dissolution ofthese and other constituents into the water. Factors such as local environmental conditions ( temperature, wind, mixing or wave action, soil type, etc), photo -oxidation, biodegradation and adsorption onto suspended sediments, can contribute to the weathering of spilled gasoline.
The aqueous solubility of non -oxygenated unleaded gasoline, based on analysis ofbenzene, toluene, ethylbenzene+ xylenes and naphthalene, is reported to be 112 mg/ l. Solubility data on individual gasoline constituents also available.
POTENTIAL TO BIOACCUMULATE
Bioconcentration Factor: No data available.
Octanol/ Water Partition Coefficient: 2 - 7
SECTION 13 DISPOSAL CONSIDERATIONS
Use material for its intended purpose or recycle ifpossible. This material, if it must be discarded, may meet the criteria of a hazardous waste as defined by international, country, or local laws and regulations.
SECTION 14 TRANSPORT INFORMATION
The description shown may not apply to all shipping situations. Consult 49CFR, or appropriate Dangerous Goods Revision Number: 0
Revision Date: March 13, 2020 1 1 of 13 Chevron and Texaco Unleaded Gasolines All Grades)
SDS : 43251
255
Regulations, for additional description requirements ( e.g., technical name) and mode -specific or shipping requirements. quantity -specific DOT Shipping Description: UN1203, GASOLINE, 3, II; OPTIONAL DISCLOSURE: UN1203, GASOLINE, 3, II, MARINE POLLUTANT ( GASOLINE) MARINE
IMO/MDG
POLLUTANT (
Shipping Description: UN1203, GASOLINE, 3, 11, FLASH POINT SEE SECTION 5 OR 9, GASOLINE) ICAO/ATA Shipping Description: UN1203, GASOLINE, 3, II
Transport in bulk
Not
according to Annex II of MARPOL 73/8 and the IBC code: applicable a SECTION 15 REGULATORY INFORMATION
EPCRA 311/12 CATEGORIES:
Aspiration Hazard
Carcinogenicity
Flammable ( gases, aerosols, liquids, or solids) Gann cell mutagenicity Reproductive toxicity
Serious eye damage or eye irritation
Skin Corrosion or Imitation
Specific target organ toxicity ( single or repeated exposure) REGULATORY LISTS SEARCHED:
01- 1=IARC Group 1
01- 2A= lARC Group 2A
01- 2B= IARC Group 2B
02= NTP Carcinogen
03—EPCRA 313
04 --CA Proposition 65
05= MA RTK
06= NJ RTK
07= PA RTK
The following components ofthis material are found on the Gasoline regulatory lists indicated. 01- 2B, 07 Toluene
04, 05, 06, 07 Xylene
Butane 03, 05, 06, 07
05, 06, 07 Ethanol
Hexane 01- 1, 02, 04, 05, 06, 07
04, 05, 06, 07 Benzene
Heptane 01- 1, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07
05, 06, 07 Ethylbenzene
Cyclohexane 01- 2B, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07
05, 06, 07 Methylcyclohexane
05, 06 Naphthalene
01- 2B, 02, 04, 05, 06, 07
CHEMICAL INVENTORIES:
All components comply with the following chemical inventory requirements: AICS ( Australia), DSL ( Canada), EINECS ( European Union), ENCS ( Japan), IECSC ( China), KECI ( Korea), PICCS ( States). Philippines), TSCA ( United I SECTION 16 OTHER INFORMATION
Revision Number: 0
Revision Date: March 13, 2020 12 of 13 Chevron and Texaco Unleaded Gasolines All Grades)
SDS : 43251
1 256
NFPA RATINGS: Health: 1 Flammability: 3 Reactivity: 0
HMIS RATINGS: Health: 2* Flammability: 3
0 - Reactivity: 0 Least, 1 - Slight, 2 -Moderate, 3 -High, 4 -Extreme, PPE:- Personal Protection Equipment Index Chronic Effect recommendation, *- Indicator). These values are obtained using the guidelines or published evaluations National Fire Protection prepared by the Association ( NFPA) or the National Paint and Coating Association ( for HMIS ratings).
REVISION STATEMENT: This is a new Safety Data Sheet. No revision information Revision Date: March 13, 2020
ABBREVIATIONS
my -
THAT MAY HAVE BEEN USED IN THIS DOCUMENT: Threshold Limit Value STEL - Short- tem Exposure Limit
GHS - Globally Harmonized System
ACGIH - American Conference of Govemmental Industrial Hygienists API - American Petroleum Institute
HMIS - Hazardous Materials Information System DOT - Department ofTransportation ( USA) IARC - International Agency for Research on
Cancer
NCEL - New Chemical Exposure Limit
SCBA - Self -Contained Breathing Apparatus
TWA Time Weighted Average
PEL Permissible Exposure Limit
CAS - Chemical Abstract Service Number
IMO/MDG
Goods Code
SDS
NFPA
NTP
International Maritime Dangerous
Safety Data Sheet
OSHA
Administration
National Fire Protection Association ( USA)
National Toxicology Program ( USA)
Occupational Safety and Health
EPA - Environmental Protection Agency
Canyon
Prepared
Road,
according
San Ramon,
to the 29
CA
CFR 1910.200 (2012) by Chevron Energy Technology Company, 6001 Bollinger 94583.
The above
hereof. Since
information
this
is based on the data of which we are aware and is believed to be correct as of the date information may be applied under conditions beyond our control and with which we may be unfamiliar and since data made available subsequent information, we do not to the date hereof may suggest modifications of the assume any upon condition that the
responsibility for the results of its use. This information is furnished person receiving it shall make his own determination of the material for his particular suitability of the purpose.
Revision Number. 0
Revision Date: March 13, 2020 13 of 13 Chevron and Texaco Unleaded Gasolines AU Grades)
SDS : 43251
257
Conforms: GHS ( rev 4) (2011)
This Safety Data Sheet conforms to the requirements of the Hazard Communication Standard ( HCS) 29 CFR 1910. 1200( g)), revised in 2012.) - United States Date of issue/ Date of revision
Date of previous issue
Version
07/ 27/017
11/ 25/014
2. 0
SAFETY DATA SHEET
DEF Ultrapure Urea Sol 32. 5%
Section 1. Identification
Product identifier
Product type
Product code
Uses
Area of application
Supplier
Supplier' s details
Address
Street
Postal code
City
Country
Telephone number
Fax no.
e- mail address of person
responsible for this SDS
Emergency telephone number
with hours of operation)
DEF Ultrapure Urea Sol 32. 5%
Liquid
PA5167
Industrial applications
Yara North America, Inc.
100 North Tampa Street, Suite 3200
33602
TAMPA
United States
1 813 222 5700
1 813 875 5735
yna- hesq@yara. com
US: Chemtrec 24 -hours Emergency Response: 1- 800- 424- 9300
Canada: 24 Hour Emergency Service, ( Canutec 613- 996-
6666)
National advisory body/ Poison Center
Name The National Poisons Emergency number
Telephone number 1 800 222 1222
Section 2. Hazards identification
OSHAIHCS status This material is not considered hazardous by the OSHA Hazard Communication Standard ( 29 CFR 1910. 1200).
Classification and Iabellina have been performed following the guidelines and recommendation of GHS and the intended use.
Classification of the
substance or mixture.
Not classified.
GHS label elements
Signal word No signal word.
258
DEF Ultrapure Urea Sol 32. 5%
Hazard statements
Precautionary statements
General
Hazards not otherwise
classified
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
None.
Section 3. Composition/ information on ingredients
Substance/ mixture Mixture
There are no ingredients present which, within the current knowledge of the supplier and in the concentrations applicable, are classified as hazardous to health or the environment and hence require reporting in this section.
Occupational exposure limits, if available, are listed in Section 8.
Remark Aqueous solution
Section 4. First aid measures
Description of necessary first aid measures
Eye contact
inhalation
Skin contact
Ingestion
Rinse with plenty of running water. Check for and remove any contact lenses. Get medical attention if irritation occurs.
Avoid inhalation of vapor, spray or mist. If inhaled, remove to fresh air. Get medical attention if you feel unwell.
Wash with soap and water. Get medical attention if irritation develops.
Wash out mouth with water. If material has been swallowed and the exposed person is conscious, give small quantities of water to drink. Get medical attention if adverse health effects persist or are severe.
Most important symptoms/ effects. acute and delayed
Potential acute health effects
Eye contact No known significant effects or critical hazards.
Inhalation Exposure to decomposition products may cause a health hazard. Serious effects may be delayed following exposure.
Skin contact No known significant effects or critical hazards.
Ingestion No known significant effects or critical hazards.
Over -exposure signs/ymptoms
Eye contact
Inhalation
Skin contact
Ingestion
No specific data.
No specific data.
No specific data.
No specific data.
Indication of immediate medical attention and special treatment needed. if necessary Notes to physician Treat symptomatically. Contact poison treatment specialist Date of issue : 07/ 27/017 Page: 2/ 13
259
DEF Ultrapure Urea Sol 32. 5%
Specific treatments
immediately if large quantities have been ingested or inhaled.
In case of inhalation of decomposition products in a fire, symptoms may be delayed. The exposed person may need to be kept under medical surveillance for 48 hours.
No specific treatment.
Section 5. Firefighting measures
Extinguishing media
Suitable extinguishing media
Unsuitable extinguishing
media
Specific hazards arising from
the chemical
Hazardous thermal
decomposition products
Special protective actions for
fire- fighters
Special protective equipment
for fire- fighters
Remark
Remark
Use an extinguishing agent suitable for the surrounding fire.
None identified.
In a fire or if heated, a pressure increase will occur and the container may burst.
Decomposition products may include the following materials:
carbon dioxide
carbon monoxide
nitrogen oxides
ammonia
Avoid breathing dusts, vapors or fumes from buming
materials.
In case of inhalation of decomposition products in a fire, symptoms may be delayed.
Promptly isolate the scene by removing all persons from the vicinity of the incident if there is a fire. No action shall be taken involving any personal risk or without suitable training. Fire- fighters should wear appropriate protective equipment and self- contained breathing apparatus ( SCBA) with a full face -piece operated in positive pressure mode.
Non- flammable.
None.
I Section 6. Accidental release measures
Personal precautions. Protective equipment and emergency procedures For non -emergency personnel No action shall be taken involving any personal risk or without suitable training. Evacuate surrounding areas. Keep
unnecessary and unprotected personnel from entering. Donot touch or walk through spilled material. Put on appropriate personal protective equipment.
For emergency responders If specialized clothing is required to deal with the spillage, take note of any information in Section 8 on suitable and unsuitable materials. See also the information in " For non -emergency personnel".
Environmental precautions
I
Date of issue : 07/ 27/017
Page: 3/ 13
Avoid dispersal of spilled material and runoff and contact with soil, waterways, drains and sewers. Inform the relevant authorities if the product has caused environmental pollution sewers, waterways, soil or air).
Methods and material for containment and cleaning up
Small spill . Stop leak if without risk. Move containers from spill area. Dilute 260
DEF Ultrapure Urea Sol 32. 5%
Large spill
with water and mop up if water- soluble. Altematively, or if water -insoluble, absorb with an inert dry material and place in an appropriate waste disposal container. Dispose of via a licensed waste disposal contractor.
Stop leak if without risk. Move containers from spill area.
Prevent entry into sewers, water courses, basements or
confined areas. Wash spillages into an effluent treatment plant or proceed as follows. Contain and collect spillage with noncombustible, absorbent material e.g. sand, earth, vermiculite or diatomaceous earth and place in container for disposal
according to local regulations ( see section 13). Dispose of via a licensed waste disposal contractor. Note: see section 1 for emergency contact information and section 13 for waste
disposal.
Section 7. Handling and storage
Precautions for safe handling
Protective measures
Advice on general
occupational hygiene
Conditions for safe storage,
including any incompatibilities
Put on appropriate personal protective equipment ( see
Section 8).
Eating, drinking and smoking should be prohibited in areas where this material is handled, stored and processed.
Workers should wash hands and face before eating, drinking and smoking. Remove contaminated clothing and protective equipment before entering eating areas. See also Section 8 for additional information on hygiene measures.
Store in accordance with local regulations. Store in original container protected from direct sunlight in a dry, cool and well - ventilated area, away from incompatible materials ( see section 10) and food and drink. Keep container tightly closed and sealed until ready for use. Containers that have been opened must be carefully resealed and kept upright to prevent leakage. Do not store in unlabeled containers.
Use appropriate containment to avoid environmental
contamination. Bund storage facilities to prevent soil and water pollution in the event of spillage.
Section 8. Exposure controls/ personal protection
Control parameters
Occupational exposure limits None.
Appropriate engineering
controls
Environmental exposure
controls
Good general ventilation should be sufficient to control worker exposure to airbome contaminants.
Emissions from ventilation or work process equipment should be checked to ensure they comply with the requirements of environmental protection legislation. In some cases, fume scrubbers, filters or engineering modifications to the process equipment will be necessary to reduce emissions to
acceptable levels.
Date of issue : 07/ 27/017 Page: 4/ 13
261
DEF Ultrapure Urea Sol 32. 5%
Individual protection measures
Hygiene measures
Eye/ face protection
Skin protection
Hand protection
Body protection
Other skin protection
Respiratory protection
Personal protective equipment .
Pictograms)
Wash hands, forearms and face thoroughly after handling chemical products, before eating, smoking and using the lavatory and at the end of the working period. Wash
contaminated clothing before reusing. A washing facility or water for eye and skin cleaning purposes should be present.
Safety eyewear complying with an approved standard should be used when a risk assessment indicates this is necessary to avoid exposure to liquid splashes, mists, gases or dusts.
Chemical - resistant, impervious gloves complying with an approved standard should be worn at all times when handling chemical products if a risk assessment indicates this is necessary.
Personal protective equipment for the body should be selected based on the task being performed and the risks involved.
Appropriate footwear and any additional skin protection measures should be selected based on the task being
performed and the risks involved and should be approved by a specialist before handling this product.
Use a properly fitted, air -purifying or air -fed respirator complying with an approved standard if a risk assessment indicates this is necessary. Respirator selection must be based on known or anticipated exposure levels, the hazards of the product and the safe working limits of the selected respirator.
Section 9. Physical and chemical properties
Appearance
Physical state
Color
Odor
Odor threshold
pH
Boiling/ condensation point
Sublimation temperature
Flash point
Evaporation rate
Flammability ( solid, gas)
Lower and upper explosive
flammable) limits
Liquid
Colorless.
slight, ammoniacal
Not determined.
9- 10
100 ° C
100 ° C)
Not determined.
Not applicable
Not determined.
Non- flammable.
Lower: Not determined.
Upper. Not determined.
Date of issue : 07/ 27/017 Page: 5/ 13
262
DEF Ultrapure Urea Sol 32. 5%
Vapor pressure
Relative density
Solubility
Solubility in water
Partition coefficient: noctanol/ water
Auto -ignition temperature
Decomposition temperature
Viscosity
Explosive properties
Oxidizing properties
Not determined.
Not determined.
Not determined.
100 g/ I
Not determined.
Not determined.
Not determined.
Dynamic: 1. 4 mPa. s © 20 °C (20 °C)
Kinematic: Not determined.
None.
None.
Section 10. Stability and reactivity
Reactivity
Chemical stability
Possibility of hazardous
reactions
Conditions to avoid
Incompatible materials
Remark
Hazardous decomposition
products
No specific test data related to reactivity available for this product or its ingredients.
The product is stable.
Under normal conditions of storage and use, hazardous
reactions will not occur.
Avoid contamination by any source including metals, dust and organic materials.
Urea reacts with calcium hypochlorite or sodium hypochlorite to form the explosive nitrogen trichloride.
Reactive or incompatible with the following materials:
Oxidizing agents
acids
alkalis
Nitrites and nitrates
Under normal conditions of storage and use, hazardous
decomposition products should not be produced.
Section 11. Toxicological information
Information on toxicological effects
Acute toxicity
Conclusion/ Summary
Irritation/ Corrosion
Conclusion/ Summary
Skin
No known significant effects or critical hazards.
No known significant effects or critical hazards.
Date of issue : 07/ 27/017 Page: 6/ 13
263
Conclusion/ Summary
Reproductive toxicity
Conclusion/ Summary
Teratogenicity
DEF Ultrapure Urea Sol 32. 5%
Eyes
Respiratory
Sensitization
Conclusion/ Summary
Skin
Respiratory
Mutagenicity
No known significant effects or critical hazards.
No known significant effects or critical hazards.
No known significant effects or critical hazards.
No known significant effects or critical hazards.
Conclusion/ Summary No known significant effects or critical hazards.
Carcinogenicity
No known significant effects or critical hazards.
No known significant effects or critical hazards.
Conclusion/ Summary No known significant effects or critical hazards.
Specific target organ toxicity ( single exposure)
No known significant effects or critical hazards.
Specific target organ toxicity (repeated exposure)
No known significant effects or critical hazards.
Aspiration hazard
No known significant effects or critical hazards.
Information on likely routes of Not available.
exposure
Potential acute health effects
Eye contact
Inhalation
Skin contact
Ingestion
No known significant effects or critical hazards.
Exposure to decomposition products may cause a health
hazard. Serious effects may be delayed following exposure. No known significant effects or critical hazards.
No known significant effects or critical hazards.
Symptoms related to the physical chemical and toxicological characteristics Eye contact No specific data.
Inhalation No specific data.
Skin contact No specific data.
I
Date of issue : 07/ 27/017
Page:?/ 13 I
264
DEF Ultrapure Urea Sol 32. 5%
Ingestion No specific data.
Delayed and immediate effects as well as chronic effects from short and long- term exposure Short term exposure
Potential immediate effects
Potential delayed effects
Lona term exposure
Potential immediate effects
Potential delayed effects
Potential chronic health effects
Conclusion/ Summary
General
Carcinogenicity
Mutagenicity
Teratogenicity
Developmental effects
Fertility effects
Over -exposure signs/ymptoms
Eye contact
Inhalation
Skin contact
Ingestion
Numerical measures of toxicity
Acute toxicity estimates
Not available.
Not available.
Not available.
Not available.
Not available.
No known significant effects or critical hazards.
No known significant effects or critical hazards.
No known significant effects or critical hazards.
No known significant effects or critical hazards.
No known significant effects or critical hazards.
No known significant effects or critical hazards.
No known significant effects or critical hazards.
No specific data.
No specific data.
No specific data.
No specific data.
Section 12. Ecological information
Toxicity
Conclusion/ Summary
Persistence and degradability
Conclusion/ Summary
Bioaccumulative potential
Conclusion/ Summary
Mobility in soil
Soil/ water partition
coefficient ( KOC)
Mobility
No known significant effects or critical hazards.
No known significant effects or critical hazards.
No known significant effects or critical hazards.
Not available.
This product may move with surface or groundwater flows Date of issue : 07/ 27/017 Page: 8/ 13
265
DEF Ultrapure Urea Sol 32. 5% I
Other adverse effects
because its water solubility is: high
No known significant effects or critical hazards.
I Section 13. Disposal considerations
Product
Methods of disposal The generation of waste should be avoided or minimized wherever possible. Disposal of this product, solutions and any by- products should at all times comply with the
requirements of environmental protection and waste
disposal legislation and any regional local authority requirements. Dispose of surplus and non -recyclable products via a licensed waste disposal contractor. Waste should not be disposed of untreated to the sewer unless fully compliant with the requirements of all authorities with jurisdiction. Waste packaging should be recycled.
Incineration or landfill should only be considered when recycling is not feasible. This material and its container must be disposed of in a safe way. Empty containers or
liners may retain some product residues. Avoid dispersal of spilled material and runoff and contact with soil, waterways, drains and sewers.
Section 14. Transport information
Regulation: UN Class
14. UN number
14. 2 UN proper shipping name
14. 3 Transport hazard class( e)
14. 4Packing group
14. 5 Environmental hazards
Not regulated.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Additional information
Environmental hazards
Not applicable.
No.
No.
Regulation: IMDG
14. UN number
14. 2 UN proper shipping name
14. 3
Transport hazard class( e)
14. 4
Packing group
14. 5 Environmental hazards
Additional information
Marine pollutant
Not regulated.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
No.
Not available.
IRegulation: IATA
14. UN number
IDate of issue : 07/ 27/017
Not regulated. 1
Page: 9/ 13
266
DEF Ultrapure Urea Sol 32. 5%
14. 2 UN proper shipping name Not applicable.
14. 3 Transport hazard class( e) Not applicable.
14. 4 Packing group Not applicable.
14. 5 Environmental hazards No.
Additional information
Marine pollutant : No.
Regulation: DOT Classification
14. UN number Not regulated.
14. 2 UN proper shipping name Not applicable.
14. 3 Transport hazard class( e) Not applicable.
14. 4 Packing group Not applicable.
14. 5 Environmental hazards No.
Additional information
Marine pollutant : Not available.
Regulation: TDG Class
14. UN number Not regulated.
14. 2 UN proper shipping name Not applicable.
14. 3 Transport hazard class( e) Not applicable.
14. 4 Packing group Not applicable.
14. 5 Environmental hazards No.
Additional information
Not applicable.
Environmental hazards : No.
14. 6 Special precautions for Transport within user' s premises: Ensure that persons transporting the product know what to do in the event of an accident or spillage.
user
IMSBC Not applicable.
Transport in bulk according to Annex 11 of MARPOL and the IBC Code Proper shipping name
Ship type
Pollution category
Urea solution
3 Z
Section 15. Regulatory information
United States
U. S. Federal regulations TSCA 8(a) CDR Exempt/ Partial exemption: Not determined
United States - EPA Clean water act (CWA) section
311 - Hazardous substances: Ammonia;
Date of issue : 07/ 27/017 Page: 10/3
267
DEF Ultrapure Urea Sol 32. 5%
Clean Air Act Section 112( b) Not listed
Hazardous Air Pollutants
HAPs)
Clean Air Act Section 602 Not listed
Class I Substances
Clean Air Act Section 602 . Not listed
Class II Substances
DEA List I Chemicals . Not listed
Precursor Chemicals)
DEA List II Chemicals . Not listed
Essential Chemicals)
SARA 302/04
Composition/ information on ingredients
Name EHS SARA 302/04
Ammonia 0 Yes. SARA 302 TPQ: 500 Ib( s)
SARA 304 RQ: 100 Ib( s)
SARA 304 RQ
SARA 311/2
Classification
111111. 1 Ibs
Not applicable.
Composition/ information on ingredients
No products were found.
State regulations
Massachusetts
New York
New Jersey
Pennsylvania
None of
None of
None of
None of
the components are listed.
the components are listed.
the components are listed.
the components are listed.
California Prop. 65
This product contains a chemical ( or chemicals) known to the State of Califomia to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm.
References
Inventory list
EU REACH IUCLID5 CSR.
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, U. S.
Dept. of Health, Education, and Welfare, Reports and
Memoranda Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical
Substances.
Sphera Solutions Inc., 4777 Levy Street, St Laurent,
Quebec HAR 2P9, Canada.
Date of issue : 07/ 27/017 Page: 11/3
268
DEF Ultrapure Urea Sol 32. 5%
New Zealand Inventory of Chemicals ( NZIoC): All components are listed or exempted.
Korea inventory: All components are listed or exempted.
China inventory ( IECSC): All components are listed or exempted.
Australia inventory (AICS): All components are listed or exempted.
Canada inventory ( DSL and NDSL): All components are listed or exempted.
Taiwan Chemical Substances Inventory ( TCSI): All components are listed or exempted.
Taiwan Chemical Substances Inventory ( TCSI): All components are listed or exempted.
United States inventory ( TSCA 8b): All components are listed or exempted.
EC INVENTORY ( EINECS/ ELINCS): All components are listed or exempted.
Canada: All components are listed or exempted.
Section 16. Other information
Hazardous Material Information System ( U. S. A.)
0 0
Caution: HMIS® ratings are based on a 0-4 rating scale, with 0 representing minimal hazards or risks, and 4 representing significant hazards or risks Although HMIS® ratings are not required on MSDSs under 29 CFR 1910.200, the preparer may choose to provide them. HMIS® ratings are to be used with a
fully implemented HMIS® program. HMIS® is a registered mark of the National Paint & Coatings Association ( NPCA). HMIS® materials may be purchased exclusively from J. J. Keller ( 800) 327- 6868.
The customer is responsible for determining the PPE code for this material.
Chronic toxicity:
No data available.
Carcinogen, Target organs, Reproductive effects, Sensitizer to lungs National Fire Protection Association ( U. S. A.)
Flammability
Health (40!>>. Instability/ Reactivity Special
Procedure used to derive the classification
Classification Justification
Not classified. Calculation method
History
Date of printing
Date of issue/ Date of revision
Date of previous issue
Version
Prepared by
Key to abbreviations
08/ 27/018
07/ 27/017
11/ 25/014
2. 0
Yara Chemical Compliance ( YCC).
ATE = Acute Toxicity Estimate
Date of issue : 07/ 27/017 Page: 12/3
269
DEF Ultrapure Urea Sol 32. 5% I
References
t
BCF = Bioconcentration Factor
GHS = Globally Harmonized System of Classification and
Labelling of Chemicals
IATA = International Air Transport Association
IBC = Intermediate Bulk Container
IMDG = International Maritime Dangerous Goods
LogPow = logarithm of the octanol/ water partition coefficient MARPOL = International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution From Ships, 1973 as modified by the Protocol of 1978. (" Marpol" = marine pollution)
UN = United Nations
EU REACH IUCLID5 CSR.
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, U. S.
Dept. of Health, Education, and Welfare, Reports and
Memoranda Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical
Substances.
Sphera Solutions Inc., 4777 Levy Street, St Laurent, Quebec HAR 2P9, Canada.
A la : s+ lY issued version
Notice to reader
To the best of our knowledge, the information contained herein is accurate. However, neither the above -named supplier, nor any of its subsidiaries, assumes any liability whatsoever for the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein. Final determination of suitability of any material is the sole responsibility of the user. All materials may present unknown hazards and should be used with caution. Although certain hazards are described herein, we cannot guarantee that these are the only hazards that exist.
Date of issue : 07/ 27/017
Page: 13/3
270
Addendum 2
Fuel, DEF, Equipment and Contractor Service Prices
Unleaded Gasoline: (. 30 cpg) over Actual Date of Delivery OPIS Average pricing.
No. 2 Clear Carb Diesel: (.30 cpg) over Actual Date of Delivery OPIS Average pricing.
No. 2 Clear Carb Diesel Prices for Generators: (.40 cpg) over Actual Date of Delivery OPIS Average pricing.
Diesel Exhaust Fluid ( DEF): DEF pricing will be (. 65 cpg) over cost.
Fuel Filters: 30 Micron, 1" Fuel Filters for fuel tanks ( No Cost) Fuel Filters: 30 Micron, 1" Fuel Filters for generator sites ($ 14. 95 each) if needed.
Annual Equipment Inspection: Flow Test and Annual Inspection ( No Cost) Annual CARB Testing: This testing is subject to CARB' sContractor pricing. (Unknown) Fuel System Repair Contractor Labor Costs: ($ 150. 00 per hour) 271
Addendum 3
Attachment 2 - Sample Service Contract
Response to Terms of Sample Service Contract.
Scope of Work
Valley Pacific Petroleum Service accepts the terms included in the Scope of Work section of the Sample Agreement.
Scope of Work
Valley Pacific agrees to provide all services described in the scope of work as listed in Section C of the " Request for Bulk Fuel and Supply for the City of Lathrop Fuel Station, Pumps and Generators". Specific details of those services are listed in Valley Pacific' sresponse to the RFP.
Contract Price
Fuel and DEF delivery services are provided based on weekly price changes. Valley Pacific Petroleum Service agrees to provide services based on the details provided in Section C.
Subsection 9 of the original Request for Proposal.
Time For Performance
Valley Pacific proposes the terms of this agreement to be for three ( 3) years from the date th. e agreement is signed.
Permits; Compliance With Law
Valley Pacific agrees to this section of the Sample Service contract.
Inspection By City
Fuel and DEF delivery services do not require Valley Pacific Petroleum Services to establish any specific work spaces; however, Valley Pacific Petroleum Services agrees to the terms of this section of the Sample Service Contract.
Notice
Valley Pacific agrees to the terms of this section of the Sample Service Contract.
Accident Prevention
Valley Pacific agrees to the terms of this section of the Sample Service Contract.
Contractor' sWarranty
Valley Pacific agrees to the terms of this section of the Sample Service Contract. 272
Apprentices
Valley Pacific currently does not use apprentices for any aspect of fuel or DEF delivery services.
If this changes for any reason, Valley Pacific agrees to comply with all requirements listed in California Labor Code Sections 1777. 5, 1777. 6and 1777. 7as listed in Sample Service Contract.
Hours of Work
Since the proposed services provided by Valley Pacific do not include construction, alteration, demolition or installation, or repair of equipment by Valley Pacific, this section of the agreement may not apply. If this changes Valley Pacific agrees to comply with this section of the Sample Service Contract.
Payroll Records
Valley Pacific Petroleum Service does not perform repair and maintenance services, or construction services related to fuel and DEF delivery services, so the terms and conditions of this section of the Sample Service Contract may not apply. If this changes Valley Pacific agrees to comply with those parts of this section of the contract as prescribed under California Labor Code Section 1776.
Prevailing Wage
Valley Pacific agrees to comply with this section of the Sample Service Contract.
Insurance
Valley Pacific Petroleum Service agrees to this section of the Sample Service Contract.
Documentation of any required Proof of Insurance will be made available to the City of Lathrop, upon request.
Indemnification
Valley Pacific agrees to the terms in this section of the Sample Service Contract.
Severability
Valley Pacific agrees to the terms of this portion of the Sample Service Contract.
Complete Agreement
Valley Pacific agrees to the terms of this section of the Sample Service Contract.
Interpretation
Valley Pacific agrees to the terms of this section of the Sample Service Contract.
Applicable Law
Valley Pacific agrees to the terms of this section of the Sample Service Contract.
Signatures
Valley Pacific agrees to the terms of this section of the Sample Service Contract. 273
ATTACHMENT 2 - SAMPLE SERVICE CONTRACT
SERVICE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF LATHROP
AND « CONTRACTOR NAME».
TO PROVIDE « SERVICES»
THIS SERVICE CONTRACT ( hereinafter " Contract") is made on , 20XX, by and between the City of Lathrop, a municipal corporation of the State of California ( hereinafter City") and « CONTRACTOR NAME» (hereinafter " Contractor"), whose Taxpayer Identification Number is -
For and in consideration of the following covenants, terms and conditions, City and Contractor (the parties) agree:
SCOPE OF WORK
Contractor agrees to perform « SERVICES» in accordance with the scope of work and fee proposal provided by the Contractor, attached hereto as Exhibit " A" and incorporated herein by reference. Contractor agrees to diligently perform these services in accordance with the upmost standards of its profession and to City' ssatisfaction.
CONTRACT PRICE
The City agrees to pay and the Contractor agrees to accept, in full payment for the work above agreed to be done based on time and materials basis not to exceed «$ INSERT» set forth in Exhibit "A".
TIME FOR PERFORMANCE
The effective date of this Contract is . 20XX, and it shall terminate no later than 20XX.
PERMITS; COMPLIANCE WITH LAW
The Contractor shall, at its expense, obtain all necessary permits, licenses, easements, etc., for the construction of the project, give necessary notices, pay all fees required by law, and comply with all laws, ordinances, rules and regulations relating to the work and to the preservation of the public health and safety.
INSPECTION BY CITY
The Contractor shall at all times maintain proper facilities and provide safe access for inspection by the City to all parts of the work, and to the shops wherein the work is in preparation.
Where the Specifications require work to be specially tested or approved, it shall not be tested or covered up without timely, written approval by the City. Should any such work be covered up without such notice, approval, or consent, it must, if required by City, be uncovered for examination at the Contractor' sexpense.
NOTICE
Any notice from one party to the other under the Contract shall be in writing and shall be dated and signed by the party giving such notice or by a duly authorized representative of such
274
ATTACHMENT 2 - SAMPLE SERVICE CONTRACT
party. Any such notice shall not be effective for any purpose whatsoever unless served in the following manner.
If the notice is given to the City, by personal delivery thereof to the City' s Director of Public
Works, or by depositing the same in the United States mail, enclosed in a sealed envelope, addressed to the City' s
Director of Public Works, postage prepaid and
certified;
If the notice is given to the Contractor, by personal delivery thereof to said Contractor or to its duly authorized representative at the site of the project, or by depositing the same in the United States mail, enclosed in a sealed envelope, addressed to the Contractor at the address set forth in the Contractor' s Bid postage prepaid and certified; or
If the notice is given to the surety or any other person, by personal delivery to such surety or other person, or by depositing the same in the United States mail, enclosed in a sealed envelope, addressed to such surety or other person, as the case may be, at the address of such surety or person last communicated by it to the party giving the notice, postage prepaid and certified.
ACCIDENT PREVENTION
Precaution shall be exercised at all times for the protection of persons ( including employees) and property.
The safety provisions of applicable laws, building and construction codes shall be observed. Machinery, equipment, and other hazards shall be guarded or eliminated in accordance with the safety provisions of the Construction Safety Orders issued by the Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board of the State of California.
CONTRACTOR' SWARRANTY
The City shall not, in any way or manner, be answerable or suffer loss, damage, expense or liability for any loss or damage that may happen to said building, work, or equipment or any part thereof, or in, on, or about the same during its construction and before acceptance.
Contractor unqualifiedly warrants all work and materials to be free of defects whether performed or installed by it or by any subcontractor or supplier in the project which is the subject of this Contract.
APPRENTICES
The Contractor' s attention is directed to the provisions of Sections 1777. 5, 1777. 6, and 1777. 7of the California Labor Code concerning employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. In addition, Contractor shall obtain a certificate of apprenticeship before employing any apprentice pursuant to Sections 1777. 5, 1777. 6 and 1777. 7of the California Labor Code.
Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of industrial Relations, ex officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, Califomia, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices.
275
ATTACHMENT 2 — SAMPLE SERVICE CONTRACT
Knowing
dollars ($
violations of Section 1777. 5 will result in forfeiture not to exceed one hundred 100) for each calendar 1777. 7.
day of non- compliance pursuant to Section
HOURS OF WORK
Eight ( 8) hours of work in any calendar day shall constitute a Contractor and each legal day' s work. The subcontractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City, twenty- fivedollars ($ 25) each worker for employed in the execution of work on the Project by the Contractor or subcontractor under him for each any to work more than
calendar day during which such worker is required or permitted eight ( 8) hours in any one calendar day and week in violation forty ( 40) hours in any calendar of the provisions of the Labor Code, and in 1815, particular, Section 1810 to Section thereof, subcontractors
inclusive,
in
except that work performed by employees of the Contractor and his excess of rate of
eight hours per day at not less than one and one half times the basic pay, as provided in Labor Code section 1815.
PAYROLL RECORDS
each subcontractor
Pursuant to Labor Code section 1776, as amended from time to time, the Contractor and shall keep records showing the name, address, social classification, security number, work wages paid to
straight
each
time and overtime hours paid each day and week, and the actual per diem joumeyman, apprentice, worker or other in connection with employee employed by him or her the work.
The certified
Enforcement or shall
payroll records shall be on forms provided by the Division of Labor Standards contain the same information as the forms provided by the Division.
The payroll records shall be certified and shall be available for hours at the inspection at all reasonable principal office of the Contractor on the following basis:
A certified copy of the employee' spayroll records shall be made available for or furnished to inspection such employee or his or her authorized representative on request.
A certified copy of all payroll records shall be made available for inspection or upon furnished request, or as of Labor
required by Labor Code section 1771. 7to the City, the Division Standards Enforcement and the Division of the Department Apprenticeship Standards of of Industrial Relations.
A certified
for inspection
copy of all
or
payroll records shall be made available upon request to the public copies thereof made; provided, however, that if request by the public shall be made through either the City, the Division of Standards, or the Division Apprenticeship of Labor Standards Enforcement, if as payroll requested, records have been provided pursuant to paragraph ( b), the shall, prior to requesting party being provided the records, reimburse the cost of preparation by the Contractor, subcontractors and the The entity through which the request was made.
Contractor.
public shall not be given access to such records at the principal office of the The Contractor shall file a certified copy of the payroll records with the entity that requested such records within ten ( 10) calendar days after receipt of a written request.
276
ATTACHMENT 2 — SAMPLE SERVICE CONTRACT
Any copy of records made available for inspection as copies and fumished upon request to the public or the City, the Division of Apprenticeship Standards, or the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement, shall be marked or obliterated in such a manner as to prevent disclosure of an individual' sname, address, and social security number. The name and address of the Contractor or any subcontractor performing work on the Project shall not be marked or obliterated.
The Contractor shall inform the City of the location of the payroll records, including the street address, city and county, and shall, within five ( 5) calendar days, provide a notice of a change of location and address.
In the event of noncompliance with the requirements of this section, the Contractor shall have ten ( 10) calendar days in which to comply subsequent to receipt of written notice specifying in what respects the Contractor must comply with this section. Should noncompliance still be evident after such ten ( 10) calendar day period, the Contractor shall, as a penalty to the City, forfeit twenty- five dollars ($ 25) for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each worker until strict compliance is effectuated.
Upon the request of the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement, such penalties shall be withheld from payments due Contractor.
PREVAILING WAGES
The Contractor is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Sections 1720 et seq. and 1770 et seq., as well as Califomia Code of Regulations, Title 8, section 16000 et seq. (" Prevailing Wage Laws") which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on certain " public works" and " maintenance" projects. Since this Contract involves an applicable " public works" or "maintenance" project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and since the total compensation is $ 1, 000 or more, Contractor agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. The Contractor shall obtain a copy of the
prevailing rates of per diem wages applicable to the work to be performed by subcontractors from the website of the Division of Labor Statistics and Research of the Department of Industrial Relations located at
http:// www. dir. ca.ov/ dlsr/ PWD/ index. htm. In the alternative, the City shall provide Contractor with a copy of the prevailing rates of per diem wages applicable to the work to be performed by subcontractors. Contractor shall make copies of the prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft, classification or type of worker needed to perform work on the Project available to interested parties upon request, and shall post copies at the Contractor' s
principal place of business and at the
Project site.
Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claims, liabilities, costs, penalties or interest arising out of any failure or allege failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws.
The Contractor and each subcontractor shall forfeit as a penalty to the City not more than fifty dollars ($ 50) for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each worker paid less than the stipulated prevailing rate for any work done by him, or by any subcontract under him, in violation of the provisions of the California Labor Code.
The difference between such stipulated prevailing wage rate and the amount paid
277
ATTACHMENT 2 — SAMPLE SERVICE CONTRACT
to each worker for each calendar day or portion thereof for which each worker was paid less than the stipulated prevailing wage rate shall be paid to each worker by the Contractor.
INSURANCE
On or before beginning any of the services or work called for by any term of this Agreement, CONTRACTOR, at its own cost and expense, shall carry, maintain for the duration of the Agreement, and provide proof thereof that is acceptable to the CITY the insurance specified in subsections (a) through ( c) below with insurers and under forms of insurance satisfactory in all respects to the CITY. CONTRACTOR shall not allow any subcontractor to commence work on any subcontract until all insurance required of the CONTRACTOR has also been obtained for the subcontractor. Verification of this insurance shall be submitted and made part of this Agreement prior to execution.
a) Workers' Compensation. CONTRACTOR shall, at CONTRACTOR' Ssole cost and expense, maintain Statutory Workers' Compensation Insurance and Employer' s Liability Insurance for any and all persons employed directly or indirectly by CONTRACTOR. Said Statutory Workers' Compensation Insurance and Employer' s Liability Insurance shall be provided with limits of not less than one million dollars ($ 1, 000,0). In the alternative, CONTRACTOR may rely on a self- insurance program to meet these requirements provided that the program of self- insurance complies fully with the provisions of the California Labor Code. The insurer, if insurance is provided, orthe CONTRACTOR, if a program of self- insurance is provided, shall waive all rights of subrogation against the CITY for loss arising from work performed under this Agreement.
b) Commercial General and Automobile Liability Insurance. CONTRACTOR, at CONTRACTOR' Sown cost and expense, shall maintain commercial general and automobile liability insurance for the period covered by this Agreement in an amount not less than one million dollars per occurrence 1, 000,0), combined single limit coverage for risks associated with the work contemplated by this Agreement. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or an Automobile Liability form or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work to be performed under this Agreement or the general aggregate limit shall be at least twice the required occurrence limit. Such coverage shall include but shall not be limited to, protection against claims arising from bodily and personal injury, including death resulting therefrom, and damage to property resulting from activities contemplated under this Agreement, including the use of owned and non -owned automobiles.
Coverage shall be at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability occurrence form CG 0001 ( ed. 11/ 88) and insurance Services Office Automobile Liability form CA 0001 ( ed. 12/ 90) Code 1 ( any auto).
Each of the following shall be included in the insurance coverage or added as an endorsement to the policy:
278
ATTACHMENT 2 — SAMPLE SERVICE CONTRACT
i) CITY, its officers, employees, and volunteers are to be covered as insured with respect to each of the following: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of CONTRACTOR, products and completed operations of CONTRACTOR; premises owned, occupied or used by CONTRACTOR. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to CITY, its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers.
ii) The insurance shall cover on an occurrence or an accident basis, and not on a claim made basis.
iii) An endorsement must state that coverage is primary insurance and that no other insurance affected by the CITY will be called upon to contribute to a loss under the coverage.
iv) Any failure of CONTRACTOR to comply with reporting provisions of the policy shall not affect coverage provided to CITY and its officers, employees, agents, and volunteers.
v) Insurance is to be placed with Califomia- aditted insurers with a Best' srating of no less than A: VII.
vi) Notice of cancellation or non -renewal must be received by CITY at least thirty days prior to such change.
c) Deductibles and Self -Insured Retentions. CONTRACTOR shall disclose the self -insured retentions and deductibles before beginning any of the services or work called for by any term of this Agreement. During the period covered by this Agreement, upon express written authorization of CITY Manager, CONTRACTOR may increase such deductibles or self - insured retentions with respect to CITY, its officers, employees, agents, and volunteers. The CITY Manager may condition approval of an increase in deductible or self -insured retention levels upon a requirement
that CONTRACTOR procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses that is satisfactory in all respects to each of them.
d) Notice of Reduction in Coverage. In the event that any coverage required under subsections (a), (b), or (c) of this section of the Agreement is reduced, limited, or materially affected in any other manner, earliest
CONTRACTOR
possible
shall
opportunity
provide
and
written
in no
notice
case
to
later
CITY
than
at
five
CONTRACTOR' S
days after
CONTRACTOR is notified of the change in coverage.
e) In addition to any other remedies CITY may have if CONTRACTOR fails to provide or maintain any insurance policies or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, CITY may, at its sole option:
279
ATTACHMENT 2 - SAMPLE SERVICE CONTRACT
i) Obtain such insurance and deduct and retain the amount of the premiums for such insurance from any sums due under the Agreement;
ii) Order CONTRACTOR to stop work under this Agreement or withhold any payment which becomes due to CONTRACTOR
hereunder, or both stop work and withhold any payment, until CONTRACTOR demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof;
iii) Terminate this Agreement.
Exercise of any of the above remedies, however, is an alternative to other remedies CITY may have and is not the exclusive remedy for CONTRACTOR' Sbreach.
INDEMNIFICATION
Contractor agrees to protect, defend, indemnify and hold City, its City Council members, officers, employees, engineer, and consultants harmless from and against any and all claims, demands, liabilities, losses, damages, costs, expenses, liens, penalties, suits, or judgments, arising in whole or in part, directly or indirectly, at any time from any injury to or death of persons or damage to property as a result of the willful or negligent act or omission of Contractor, or which results from Contractor' s
noncompliance with any Law respecting the condition, use, occupation or safety of the Project site, or any part thereof, or which arises from Contractor' sfailure to do anything required under this Contract or for doing anything which Contractor is required not to do under this Contract, or which arises from conduct for which any Law imposes strict liability on Contractor in the performance of or failure to perform the terms and conditions of this Contract, except as may arise from the sole willful or negligent act or omission of City or any of its City Council members, officers, employees.
This indemnification shall extend to any and all claims, demands, or liens made or filed by reason of any construction, renovation, or remodeling work performed by Contractor under this Contract at any time during the term of this Contract, or arising thereafter.
SEVERABILITY
Nothing contained in the Contract shall be construed so as to require the commission of any act contrary to law. Should a conflict arise between any provision contained herein and any present or future statute, law, ordinance or regulation contrary to which the parties have no legal right to contract or act, the latter shall prevail and the provision of this Contract which is affected shall be curtailed and limited but only to the extent necessary to bring it within the requirements of the law. If such curtailment or limitation is not possible, the affected provision shall be of no force and effect. Except as aforesaid, such illegality shall not affect the validity of this Contract.
COMPLETE AGREEMENT
This Contract supersedes any and all agreements, either oral or in writing, between the Parties with respect to the subject matter herein.
280
ATTACHMENT 2 — SAMPLE SERVICE CONTRACT
Each party to this Contract acknowledges that no representation by any party which is not embodied herein or any other agreement, statement, or promise not contained in this Contract shall be valid and binding.
INTERPRETATION
The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that each has been given the opportunity to independently review this Contract with legal counsel, and/ or has the requisite experience and sophistication to understand, interpret and agree to the particular language of the provisions of the Contract.
In the event of a controversy or dispute between the parties concerning the provisions herein, this document shall be interpreted according to the provisions herein and no presumption shall arise concerning the draftsmanship of such provision.
APPLICABLE LAW
The parties hereto understand and agree that the terms of this Contract, and its Exhibits, have been negotiated and executed within the State of Califomia and shall be governed by and construed under the laws of the State of Califomia.
In the event of a dispute conceming the terms of this Contract, the parties hereto expressly agree that the venue for any legal action shall be with the appropriate court in the County of San Joaquin, State of Califomia.
SIGNATURES
The individuals executing this Agreement represent and warrant that they have the right, power, legal capacity, and authority to enter into and to execute this Agreement on behalf of the respective legal entities of the CONTRACTOR and the CITY. This agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns.
281
ATTACHMENT 2 — SAMPLE SERVICE CONTRACT
Approved as to Form:
Recommended for Approval:
Approved by:
Contractor.
City of Lathrop
City Attorney
Salvador Navarrete Date
City of Lathrop
Assistant City Manager
Michael King Date
City of Lathrop
390 Towne Centre Drive
Lathrop, CA 95330
Stephen J. Salvatore Date
City Manager
CONTRACTOR NAME»
STREET ADDRESS.
CITY», CA « ZIPCODE»
Fed ID # XX-XXXXXX
Business License # XXXXX
Signature Date
Print Name and Title
Signature Date
Print Name and Title
282
ITEM 4. 11
CITY MANAGER' SREPORT
MAY 12, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
ITEM:
RECOMMENDATION:
APPROVE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AGREEMENT WITH BARKER RINKER SEACAT
ARCHITECTURE ( BRS) FOR THE CONCEPTUAL
DESIGN OF LATHROP MULTI -PURPOSE
COMMUNITY CENTER COMPLEX, CIP PK 22- 05
Adopt Resolution to Approve a Professional
Services Agreement with Barker Rinker Seacat
Architecture ( BRS) for the Conceptual Design
of Lathrop Multi -Purpose Community Center
Complex, CIP PK 22- 05
SUMMARY:
City Council officially approved the establishment of Capital Improvement Project CIP) PK 22- 05, known as the Lathrop Multi -Purpose Community Center Complex Project), as part of the FY 22/3 Parks and Recreation Department Budget. This project is a significant undertaking that will necessitate extensive planning to progress to the design and construction phase, requiring several years of dedicated effort before we witness a groundbreaking ceremony. Nevertheless, with this approval, we are embarking on the initial phase of what promises to be a transformative and remarkable community endeavor. This CIP is part of the process necessary to establish the site and have a project ready plan in an effort to secure grants to be able to provide a funding source for essential costs associated to moving this project forward.
Professional services are needed for the development of the site plan, conceptual design, programming, and budgeting. On January 22, 2025, the City issued a Request for Proposals ( RFP) for Professional Services and on March 3, 2025, staff received eleven ( 11) proposal packages. Following a thorough review of all the proposals, four 4) firms were selected to present their qualifications. After careful consideration, Barker Rinker Seacat Architecture ( BRS) was selected as the most qualified firm based on their extensive experience, proposed team, references, project approach, and comprehensive understanding of the project requirements.
Staff request the City Council approve a Professional Service Agreement ( PSA) with BRS in the amount of $ 174, 060, for architecture consulting services required for the conceptual design, site preparation, budgeting, and programming of the Lathrop Multi -Purpose Community Center Complex. It is important to note that sufficient funds have already been allocated in the FY 24/5 approved budget for this purpose. 283
CITY MANAGER' SREPORT PAGE 2
MAY 12, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
APPROVE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BARKER RINKER
SEACAT ARCHITECTURE ( BRS) FOR THE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF LATHROP MULTI -PURPOSE COMMUNITY CENTER COMPLEX, CIP PK 22- 05
BACKGROUND:
In recent years, the City of Lathrop has experienced significant growth, leading to an increased demand for community development and activities for its residents.
Responding to the community' srequests, staff are now prepared to initiate action.
This project is a direct response to the identified needs, requests, and vision of the community. The expertise and support of a consultant are essential to kickstart the planning process for this ambitious endeavor. The conceptual design would include a community center, which could include classrooms, a running/ walking track, fitness center, indoor playground, banquet hall, black box theatre, teaching kitchen, pickle ball, and multiple basketball and volleyball courts. The outdoor area could include an amphitheatre, walkway pathways, splash pad, parking, sitting areas, art walls, etc.
The multi - purpose community center complex will become a place of gathering and a community environment.
Through this consultancy award, staff will collaborate on developing a realistic site plan, conceptual designs that align with the city' s vision, and a comprehensive budget. Every aspect of the project, from minute details to overarching goals, will be meticulously programmed to ensure its success. This project represents a significant step towards enhancing the quality of life for Lathrop residents and fostering a vibrant community for years to come.
The programming for the complex involves various aspects such as determining the strategic placement of buildings, required functionality of land use, and recreation programing. Bigger programming encompasses factors like staffing requirements, operational costs, revenue potential, and budget allocation. Budgets and revenue projections play a crucial role in this project, and the City requires assistance in assessing its needs to bring this vision to life. The consultant will aid in developing an optimal site plan, determining the ideal placement of programs, considering environmental constraints, and other important considerations.
The award will mark the initial phase in advancing the project for the City. Following the issuance of an RFP on January 22, 2025, for the conceptual design of the Lathrop Multi - Purpose Community Center Complex, CIP PK 22- 05, staff received a total of eleven ( 11) proposals from qualified consultants on March 3, 2025. After a comprehensive evaluation of the RFP submissions, four ( 4) firms were selected to present to the evaluating group, with BRS ultimately chosen as the most qualified consultant with the most responsive proposal.
REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION:
The proposed services offered by BRS will enable our staff to advance to the conceptual design phase and kickstart the highly anticipated project. Pending approval by City Council, the PSA will authorize the City to enter into a contract with 284
CITY MANAGER' S REPORT PAGE 3
MAY 12, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
APPROVE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BARKER RINKER
SEACAT ARCHITECTURE ( BRS) FOR THE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF LATHROP MULTI -PURPOSE COMMUNITY CENTER COMPLEX, CIP PK 22- 05
BRS for the conceptual design of the Lathrop Multi - Purpose Community Center Complex as envisioned by the City. The conceptual design for the Project will serve as a crucial steppingstone towards the next phase of the Project and provide a project ready site plan for grant opportunities.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Sufficient funds have been allocated in the approved Fiscal Year ( FY) 2024/5budget for professional services for the conceptual design of Lathrop Multi - Purpose Community Center Complex, CIP PK 22- 05, with BRS in the amount of $ 174, 060.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Resolution to Approve a Professional Services Agreement with Barker Rinker Seacat Architecture for the Conceptual Design of Lathrop Multi - Purpose Community Center Complex, CIP PK 22- 05
B. Professional Services Agreement with Barker Rinker Seacat Architecture for the Conceptual Design of Lathrop Multi - Purpose Community Center Complex, CIP PK 22- 05
285
CITY MANAGER' S REPORT PAGE 4
MAY 12, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
APPROVE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BARKER RINKER
SEACAT ARCHITECTURE ( BRS) FOR THE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF LATHROP MULTI -PURPOSE COMMUNITY CENTER COMPLEX, CIP PK 22- 05
APPROVALS:
Todd' Seb
Director of Parks and Recreation
Brad aylor
City Engineer
Cari Ja
Direct • • Finance
24. 2-5
Date
Date
5'/ I/707, s
Date
4/// 2rs
S/ G/ zot
Thomas Hedegard Date
Deputy City Manager
S • z • zoz. s
Michael King Date
Assistant City Manager
z?" -
Salvador Navarrete Date
City Attorney
5. 7 •Z5
Stephen 3. Salvatore Date
City Manager
286
RESOLUTION NO. 25 -
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LATHROP TO
APPROVE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BARKER RINKER
SEACAT ARCHITECTURE ( BRS) FOR THE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF LATHROP MULTI -PURPOSE COMMUNITY CENTER COMPLEX, CIP PK 22- 05
WHEREAS, City Council officially approved the creation of Capital Improvement Project ( CIP) PK 22- 05, Lathrop Multi - Purpose Community Center Complex ( Project) through the FY 22/3 Parks and Recreation Department Budget; and
WHEREAS, professional services are needed for the conceptual design, development of the site plan, programming, and budgeting of the Project; and WHEREAS, on January 22, 2025, the City issued a Request for Proposals ( RFP) for the conceptual design of Lathrop Multi - Purpose Community Center Complex Project and on March 3, 2025, staff received eleven ( 11) proposals from qualified consultants; and
WHEREAS, Barker Rinker Seacat Architecture ( BRS) was selected as the most qualified firm based on their extensive experience, proposed team, references, project approach, and comprehensive understanding of the Project requirements; and
WHEREAS, staff requests the City Council to approve a Professional Service Agreement ( PSA) with Barker Rinker Seacat Architecture ( BRS) in the amount of 174, 060 for architecture consulting services to move forward on the conceptual design of Lathrop Multi -Purpose Community Center Complex; and WHEREAS, sufficient funds have been allocated in the approved FY 24/5 budget.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Lathrop does hereby approve a Professional Services Agreement ( PSA) with Barker Rinker Seacat Architecture ( BRS) in the amount of $ 174, 060 for architecture consulting services of Lathrop Multi - Purpose Community Center Complex, CIP PK 22- 05. 287
The foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 12th day of May, 2025, by the following vote of the City Council, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Paul Akinjo, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Teresa Vargas, City Clerk Salvador Navarrete, City Attorney 288
ATTACHMENT
B»
CITY OF LATHROP
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WITH BARKER RINKER SEACAT
ARCHITECTURE ( BRS)
TO PROVIDE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN
FOR
LATHROP MULTI -PURPOSE COMMUNITY CENTER COMPLEX
CIP PK 22- 05
THIS AGREEMENT, dated for convenience this 12T" day of May, 2025 is by and between Barker Rinker Seacat Architecture ( BRS) ("CONSULTANT") and the City of Lathrop, a California municipal corporation (" CITY");
RECITALS:
WHEREAS, CONSULTANT is specially trained, experienced, and competent to perform design services for Lathrop Multi -Purpose Community Center Complex, which are required by this agreement; and
WHEREAS, CITY selected the CONSULTANT pursuant to said qualifications; and WHEREAS, CONSULTANT is willing to render such Professional Consulting Design Services, as hereinafter defined on the following terms and conditions; NOW, THEREFORE, CONSULTANT and the CITY agree as follows:
AGREEMENT
1) Scope of Service
CONSULTANT agrees to design and prepare plans, specifications and an engineering estimate ( PS& E) and to provide engineering support services during construction of Lathrop Multi -Purpose Community Center Complex in accordance with the scope of work and fee proposal provided by CONSULTANT, attached hereto as Exhibit " A" and incorporated herein by reference. CONSULTANT represents it is prepared to and can diligently perform these services in accordance with the upmost standards of its profession and to CITY' Ssatisfaction. The fee proposal shall include all reimbursable costs required for the performance of the Scope of Services. Payment of additional reimbursable costs considered to be over and above those inherent in the original Scope of Services shall be approved of in advance and in writing, by the CITY.
2) Compensation
CITY hereby agrees to pay CONSULTANT $ 174, 060. for the Professional Services set forth in Exhibit " A". CONSULTANT shall be paid any uncontested sum due and payable within thirty (30) days of receipt of billings containing all information pursuant to Paragraph 5 below. Compensation for any task must be equal to or less than the percentage of task complete. In no event shall CONSULTANT be entitled to compensation for work not included in Exhibit " A", unless a written change order or authorization describing the extra
289
CITY OF LATHROP - BARKER RINKER SEACAT ARCHITECTURE ( BRS)
TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR THE DESIGN OF
LATHROP MULTI -PURPOSE COMMUNITY CENTER COMPLEX, CIP PK 22- 05 work and payment terms has been executed by CITY' sauthorized representative prior to the commencement of the work. Payment is made based on a time and materials basis. 3) Effective Date and Term
The effective date of this Agreement is May 12, 2025, and it shall terminate no later than December 31, 2026.
4) Independent Contractor Status
It is expressly understood and agreed by both parties that CONSULTANT, while engaged in carrying out and complying with any of the terms and conditions of this Agreement, is an independent contractor and not an employee of the CITY. As an independent contractor, CONSULTANT is responsible for controlling the means and methods to complete the scope of work described in Exhibit "A" to City' ssatisfaction. CONSULTANT expressly warrants not to represent, at any time or in any manner, that CONSULTANT is an employee of the CITY.
5) Billings
CONSULTANT shall submit invoices for completed work on a monthly basis, or as otherwise agreed, providing without limitation, details as to amount of hours, individual performing said work, hourly rate, and indicating to what aspect of the Scope of Services said work is attributable. CONSULTANT' Sbills shall include a list of all tasks, a total amount due, the amounts previously billed, and the net amount due on the invoice. Except as specifically authorized by CITY, CONSULTANT shall not bill CITY for duplicate services performed by more than one person. In no event shall CONSULTANT submit any billing for an amount in excess of the rates or the maximum amount of compensation provided in section ( 2) for either task or for the entire Agreement, unless modified by a properly executed change order.
6) Advice and Status Reporting
CONSULTANT shall provide the CITY with timely reports, orally or in writing, of all significant developments arising during performance of its services hereunder, and shall furnish to CITY such information as is necessary to enable CITY to monitor the performance of this Agreement.
CONSULTANT shall submit to CITY such reports, diagrams, drawings and other work products developed pursuant to the Scope of Services.
7) Assignment of Personnel
CONSULTANT acknowledges that the CITY has relied on CONSULTANT' scapabilities and on the qualifications of CONSULTANT' s
principals and staff as identified in its
proposal to CITY. The services shall be performed by, or under the direct supervision, of CONSULTANT' sAuthorized Representative: Benjamin W. Woodside, Principal. CITY shall be notified by CONSULTANT of any change of its Authorized Representative, and CITY is granted the right of approval of all original, additional, and replacement personnel at CITY' ssole discretion, and shall be notified by CONSULTANT of any changes of Page
290
2 of 11
CITY OF LATHROP - BARKER RINKER SEACAT ARCHITECTURE ( BRS)
TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR THE DESIGN OF
LATHROP MULTI - PURPOSE COMMUNITY CENTER COMPLEX, CIP PK 22- 05 CONSULTANT' sproject staff prior to any change.
CONSULTANT shall assign only competent personnel to perform services pursuant to this Agreement. If CITY asks CONSULTANT to remove a person assigned to the work called for under this Agreement, CONSULTANT agrees to do so immediately, without requiring the City to process a reason or explanation for its request. 8) Assignment and Subcontracting
It is recognized by the parties hereto that a substantial inducement to CITY for entering into this Agreement was, and is, the professional reputation and competence of CONSULTANT. Neither this Agreement nor any interest therein may be assigned by CONSULTANT without the prior written approval of CITY' Sauthorized representative.
CONSULTANT shall not subcontract any portion of the performance contemplated and provided for herein, other than the subcontractors noted in the proposal, without prior written approval of the CITY' Sauthorized representative. 9) Insurance
On or before beginning any of the services or work called for by any term of this Agreement, CONSULTANT, at its own cost and expense, shall carry, maintain for the duration of the Agreement, and provide proof thereof that is acceptable to the CITY the insurance specified in subsections (a) through ( c) below with insurers and under forms of insurance satisfactory in all respects to the CITY. CONSULTANT shall not allow any subcontractor to commence work on any subcontract until all insurance required of the CONSULTANT has also been obtained for the subcontractor. Verification of this insurance shall be submitted and made part of this Agreement prior to execution. a) Workers' Compensation. CONSULTANT shall, at CONSULTANT' Ssole cost and expense, maintain Statutory Workers' Compensation Insurance and Employer' s Liability Insurance for any and all persons employed directly or indirectly by CONSULTANT. Said Statutory Workers' Compensation Insurance and Employer' s Liability Insurance shall be provided with limits of not less than one million dollars ($ 1, 000,0). In the alternative, CONSULTANT may rely on a self- insurance program to meet these requirements provided that the program of self- insurance complies fully with the provisions of the California Labor Code. The insurer, if insurance is provided, or the CONSULTANT, if a program of self- insurance is provided, shall waive all rights of subrogation against the CITY for loss arising from work performed under this Agreement.
b) Commercial General and Automobile Liability Insurance. CONSULTANT, at CONSULTANT' Sown cost and expense, shall maintain commercial general and automobile liability insurance for the period covered by this Agreement in an amount not less than one million dollars ($ 1, 000,00) per occurrence, combined single limit coverage for risks associated with the work contemplated by this Agreement. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or an Automobile Liability form or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work to be performed under this Agreement or the general
291
CITY OF LATHROP - BARKER RINKER SEACAT ARCHITECTURE ( BRS)
TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR THE DESIGN OF
LATHROP MULTI -PURPOSE COMMUNITY CENTER COMPLEX, CIP PK 22- 05 aggregate limit shall be at least twice the required occurrence limit. Such coverage shall include but shall not be limited to, protection against claims arising from bodily and personal injury, including death resulting therefrom, and damage to property resulting from activities contemplated under this Agreement, including the use of owned and non -owned automobiles.
Coverage shall be at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability occurrence form CG 0001 ( ed. 11/ 88) and Insurance Services Office Automobile Liability form CA 0001 ( ed. 12/ 90) Code 1 ( any auto).
Each of the following shall be included in the insurance coverage or added as an endorsement to the policy:
i) CITY, its officers, employees, agents, and volunteers are to be covered as insured with respect to each of the following: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of CONSULTANT, including the insider' sgeneral supervision of CONSULTANT; products and completed operations of CONSULTANT; premises owned, occupied or used by CONSULTANT. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to CITY, its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers.
ii) The insurance shall cover on an occurrence or an accident basis, and not on a claim made basis.
iii) An endorsement must state that coverage is primary insurance and that no other insurance affected by the CITY will be called upon to contribute to a loss under the coverage.
iv) Any failure of CONSULTANT to comply with reporting provisions of the policy shall not affect coverage provided to CITY and its officers, employees, agents, and volunteers.
v) Insurance is to be placed with California - admitted insurers with a Best' srating of no less than A: VII.
vi) Notice of cancellation or non -renewal must be received by CITY at least thirty days prior to such change.
c) Professional Liability. CONSULTANT, at CONSULTANT' Sown cost and expense, shall maintain for the period covered by this Agreement professional liability insurance for licensed professionals performing work pursuant to this Agreement in an amount not less than Two Million Dollars ($ 2, 000,00) per claim made and per policy aggregate covering the licensed professionals' errors and omissions, as follows:
i) Any deductible or self -insured retention shall not exceed $ 150, 00 per claim.
ii) Notice of cancellation, material change, or non -renewal must be
292
CITY OF LATHROP - BARKER RINKER SEACAT ARCHITECTURE ( BRS)
TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR THE DESIGN OF
LATHROP MULTI - PURPOSE COMMUNITY CENTER COMPLEX, CIP PK 22- 05 received by the CITY at least thirty days prior to such change shall be included in the coverage or added as an endorsement to the policy.
iii) The policy must contain a cross liability or severability of interest clause.
iv) The following provisions shall apply if the professional liability coverages are written on a claims made form:
1. The retroactive date of the policy must be shown and must be before the date of the Agreement.
2. Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five years after completion of the Agreement or the work, so long as commercially
available at reasonable rates.
3. If coverage is canceled or not renewed and it is not replaced with another claims made policy form with a retroactive date that precedes the date of this Agreement, CONSULTANT
must provide extended reporting coverage for a minimum of five years after completion of the Agreement or the work.
The CITY shall have the right to exercise at the
CONSULTANT' Scost, any extended reporting provisions of the policy should the CONSULTANT cancel or not renew
the coverage.
4. A copy of the claim reporting requirements must be
submitted to the CITY prior to the commencement of any
work under this Agreement.
d) Deductibles and Self -Insured Retentions. CONSULTANT shall disclose the self -insured retentions and deductibles before beginning any of the services or work called for by any term of this Agreement. During the period covered by this Agreement, upon express written authorization of the CITY' s authorized representative, CONSULTANT may increase such deductibles or self -insured retentions with respect to CITY, its officers, employees, agents, and volunteers. The CITY' sauthorized representative may condition approval of an increase in deductible or self -insured retention levels upon a requirement that CONSULTANT procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses that is satisfactory in all respects to each of them.
e) Notice of Reduction in Coverage. In the event that any coverage required under subsections ( a), (b), or (c) of this section of the Agreement is reduced, limited, or materially affected in any other manner, CONSULTANT shall provide written notice to CITY at CONSULTANT' Searliest possible opportunity and in no case later than five days after CONSULTANT is notified of the change in coverage.
f) In addition to any other remedies CITY may have if CONSULTANT fails to provide or
293
CITY OF LATHROP - BARKER RINKER SEACAT ARCHITECTURE ( BRS)
TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR THE DESIGN OF
LATHROP MULTI -PURPOSE COMMUNITY CENTER COMPLEX, CIP PK 22- 05 maintain any insurance policies or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, CITY may, at its sole option:
i) Obtain such insurance and deduct and retain the amount of the premiums for such insurance from any sums due under the Agreement;
ii) Order CONSULTANT to stop work under this Agreement or withhold any payment which becomes due to CONSULTANT
hereunder, or both stop work and withhold any payment, until CONSULTANT demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof;
iii) Terminate this Agreement.
Exercise of any of the above remedies, however, is an alternative to other remedies CITY may have and is not the exclusive remedy for CONSULTANT' Sbreach.
10) Indemnification - CONSULTANT' SResponsibility
As to the CONSULTANT' S work hereunder, it is understood and agreed that ( a) CONSULTANT has the professional skills necessary to perform the work, (b) CITY relies upon the professional skills of CONSULTANT to perform the work in a skillful and professional manner, and ( c) CONSULTANT thus agrees to so perform.
Acceptance by CITY of the work performed under this Agreement does not operate as a release of said CONSULTANT from such professional responsibility for the work performed. It is further understood and agreed that CONSULTANT is apprised of the scope of the work to be performed under this Agreement and CONSULTANT agrees that said work can and shall be performed in a fully competent manner in accordance with the standard of care applicable to CONSULTANT' Sprofession.
CONSULTANT shall indemnify, defend, and hold CITY, its officers, employees, agents, and volunteers harmless from and against any and all liability, claims, suits, actions, damages, and causes of action arising out of any personal injury, bodily injury, loss of life, or damage to property, or any violation of any federal, state, or municipal law or ordinance, to the extent caused by the willful misconduct or negligent acts or omissions of CONSULTANT, its employees, subcontractors, or agents, or on account of the performance or character of this work, except for any such claim arising out of the negligence or willful misconduct of the CITY, its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers.
It is understood that the duty of CONSULTANT to indemnify and hold harmless includes the duty to defend as set forth in Section 2778 of the California Civil Code. Acceptance of insurance certificates and endorsements required under this Agreement does not relieve CONSULTANT from liability under this indemnification and hold harmless clause.
This indemnification and hold harmless clause shall apply whether or not such insurance policies shall have been determined to be applicable to any of such damages or claims for damages.
Page
294
6 of 11
CITY OF LATHROP - BARKER RINKER SEACAT ARCHITECTURE ( BRS)
TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR THE DESIGN OF
LATHROP MULTI -PURPOSE COMMUNITY CENTER COMPLEX, CIP PK 22- 05 11) Licenses
If a license of any kind, which term is intended to include evidence of registration, is required of CONSULTANT, its employees, agents, or subcontractors by federal or state law, CONSULTANT warrants that such license has been obtained, is valid and in good standing, and CONSULTANT shall keep it in effect at all times during the term of this Agreement, and that any applicable bond has been posted in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations.
12) Business Licenses
CONSULTANT shall obtain and maintain a CITY of Lathrop Business License until all Agreement services are rendered and accepted by the CITY. 13) Termination
Either CITY or CONSULTANT may cancel this Agreement upon 30 days written notification to the other party. Upon termination, or completion of services under this Agreement, all information collected, work product and documents shall be delivered by CONSULTANT to CITY within ten ( 10) calendar days.
14) Funding
CONSULTANT agrees and understands that renewal of this agreement in subsequent years is contingent upon action by the City Council consistent with the appropriations limits of Article XIII ( B) of the California Constitution and that the Council may determine not to fund this agreement in subsequent years.
15) Notices
All contracts, appointments, approvals, authorizations, claims, demands, Change Orders, consents, designations, notices, offers, requests and statements given by either party to the other shall be in writing and shall be sufficiently given and served upon the other party if ( 1) personally served, (2) sent by the United States mail, postage prepaid, (3) sent by private express delivery service, or (4) in the case of a facsimile transmission, if sent to the telephone FAX number set forth below during regular business hours of the receiving party and followed with two ( 2) Days by delivery of a hard copy of the material sent by facsimile transmission. Personal service shall include, without limitation, service by delivery and service by facsimile transmission.
295
CITY OF LATHROP - BARKER RINKER SEACAT ARCHITECTURE ( BRS)
TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR THE DESIGN OF
LATHROP MULTI -PURPOSE COMMUNITY CENTER COMPLEX, CIP PK 22- 05 To City:
Copy to:
To Consultant:
16) Miscellaneous
City of Lathrop
City Clerk
390 Towne Centre
Lathrop, CA 95330
City of Lathrop
Parks and Recreation Department
390 Towne Centre
Lathrop, CA 95330
MAIN: ( 209) 941- 7430
EMAIL tsebastian@ci. lathrop. us. ca
Barker Rinker Seacat
Architecture ( BRS)
990 S. Broadway, Suite 222
Denver, CO 80209
Fed ID #
Business License #
a) Consent. Whenever in this Agreement the approval or consent of a party is required, such approval or consent shall be in writing and shall be executed by a person having the express authority to grant such approval or consent. b) Contract Terms Prevail. All exhibits and this Agreement are intended to be construed as a single document. Should any inconsistency occur between the specific terms of this Agreement and attached exhibits, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail.
c) Controlling Law. The parties agree that this Agreement shall be governed and construed by and in accordance with the Laws of the State of California. d) Definitions. The definitions and terms are as defined in these specifications. e) Force Majeure. Neither party shall be deemed to be in default on account of any delay or failure to perform its obligations under this Agreement, which directly results from an Act of God or an act of a superior governmental authority. f) Headings. The paragraph headings are not a part of this Agreement and shall have no effect upon the construction or interpretation of any part of this Agreement. g) Incorporation of Documents. All documents constituting the Agreement documents described in Section 1 hereof and all documents which may, from time to time, be referred to in any duly executed amendment hereto are by such reference incorporated in the Agreement and shall be deemed to be part of this
296
CITY OF LATHROP - BARKER RINKER SEACAT ARCHITECTURE ( BRS)
TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR THE DESIGN OF
LATHROP MULTI -PURPOSE COMMUNITY CENTER COMPLEX, CIP PK 22- 05 Agreement.
h) Integration. This Agreement and any amendments hereto between the parties constitute the entire Agreement between the parties concerning the Project and Work, and there are no other prior oral or written agreements between the parties that are not incorporated in this Agreement.
i)
j)
Modification of Agreement. This Agreement shall not be modified or be binding upon the parties unless such modification is agreed to in writing and signed by the parties.
Ownership of Documents. All documents, photographs, reports, analyses, audits, computer media, or other material documents or data, and working papers, whether or not in final form, which have been obtained or prepared under this Agreement, shall be deemed the property of the CITY. Upon CITY' srequest, CONSULTANT shall allow CITY to inspect all such documents during the CONSULTANT' sregular business hours.
k) Provision. Any agreement, covenant, condition, clause, qualification, restriction, reservation, term or other stipulation in the Agreement shall define or otherwise control, establish or limit the performance required or permitted or to be required of or permitted by either party. All provisions, whether covenants or conditions, shall be deemed to be both covenants and conditions.
I) Severability. The invalidity in whole or part of any provision of this Agreement shall not void or affect the validity of any other provision of this agreement. If a court of competent jurisdiction finds or rules that any provision of this Agreement is void or unenforceable, the provisions of this Agreement not so affected shall remain in full force and effect.
m) Status of CONSULTANT. In the exercise of rights and obligations under this Agreement, CONSULTANT acts as an independent contractor and not as an agent or employee of CITY. CONSULTANT shall not be entitled to any rights and benefits accorded or accruing to the City Council members, officers or employees of CITY, and CONSULTANT expressly waives any and all claims to such right and benefits.
n) Successors and Assigns. The provisions of this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of, and shall apply to and bind, the successors and assigns of the parties. o) Time of the Essence. Time is of the essence of this Agreement and each of its provisions. In the calculation of time hereunder, the time in which an act is to be performed shall be computed by excluding the first Day and including the last. If the time in which an act is to be performed falls on a Saturday, Sunday or any Day observed as a legal holiday by CITY, the time for performance shall be extended to the following Business Day.
p) Venue. In the event that suit is brought by either party hereunder, the parties agree that trial of such action shall be vested exclusively in the state courts of California in the County of San Joaquin or in the United States District Court for the Eastern
297
CITY OF LATHROP - BARKER RINKER SEACAT ARCHITECTURE ( BRS)
TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR THE DESIGN OF
LATHROP MULTI - PURPOSE COMMUNITY CENTER COMPLEX, CIP PK 22- 05 District of California.
q) Recovery of Costs. The prevailing party in any action brought to enforce the terms of this Agreement or arising out of this Agreement may recover its reasonable costs, including reasonable attorney' sfees, incurred or expended in connection with such action against the non -prevailing party.
17) Notice to Proceed
Prior to commencing work under this agreement, CONSULTANT shall receive a written Notice to Proceed" from CITY. A Notice to Proceed shall not be issued until all necessary bonds and insurances have been received. City shall not be obligated to pay CONSULTANT for any services prior to issuance of the Notice to Proceed. 18) Signatures
The individuals executing this Agreement represent and warrant that they have the right, power, legal capacity, and authority to enter into and to execute this Agreement on behalf of the respective legal entities of the CONSULTANT and the CITY. This agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns.
298
CITY OF LATHROP - BARKER RINKER SEACAT ARCHITECTURE ( BRS)
TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR THE DESIGN OF
LATHROP MULTI - PURPOSE COMMUNITY CENTER COMPLEX, CIP PK 22- 05 Approved as to Form:
Recommended for Approval:
Approved by:
Consultant:
City of Lathrop
City Attorney
Salvador Navarrete
City of Lathrop
Parks and Recreation Department
Date
Todd Sebastian Date
Director
City of Lathrop
390 Towne Centre Drive
Lathrop, CA 95330
Stephen J. Salvatore Date
City Manager
Barker Rinker Seacat
Architecture ( BRS)
990 S. Broadway, Suite 222
Denver, CO 80209
Fed ID # 94 -
Business License #
Signature Date
Print Name and Title
Page
299
11 of 11
LATHROP MULTI -PURPOSE
COMMUNITY CENTER COMPLEX
MARCH 3, 2025
PROPOSAL RESPONSE
CIP PK 22- 05
BARKER
RINKER
SEACAT
ARCHITECTURE
300
301
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION A Cover Letter
SECTION B Approach to Project
SECTION C Design Team
SECTION D Additional Services
SECTION E Consultant Fees
SECTION F References and Experience
SECTION G Claims and Suits
SECTION H Exclusions
SECTION I Appendices
BARKER RINKER SEACAT ARCHITECTURE I PAGE 3
302
THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK
303
BARKER
RINKER
SEACAT
ARCHITECTURE
CALIFORNIA ARCHITECTURE
LICENSE: # C- 41165
DENVER
990 S. BROADWAY
SUITE 222
DENVER, CO 80209
AAI. 1 AS
129 S. MAIN ST.
UNIT 250
GRAPEVINE, TX 16051
CONTACT
P 303. 455. 1366
F 303155. 1451
BRSARCH. COM
Dear Ms. Mazariegos and Members of the Selection Committee, We applaud the City of Lathrop' s dedication to creating a dynamic Multi - Purpose Community Center Complex that will serve as a cornerstone for recreation, culture, and community engagement. At Barker Rinker Seacat Architecture ( BRS), we share your passion for designing spaces that foster connection, inclusivity, and lasting impact. With our expertise in innovalive, community -centered design, we are excited about the opportunity to help bring your Big Vision to life — transforming this project into a vibrant and enduring destination for Lathrop' sresidents.
BRS has focused on community center and recreation design since 1983. We have assisted over 350 communities throughout the country in successfully planning and designing a wide range of facilities in terms of scale and environment. Enhancing our team with shared values of creative, community - centered design and realistic planning are MIG ( site planning & landscape design) and Blundall Associates ( cost estimating). Our team has extensive national experience working on community recreation projects, including in California.
Beyond our breadth of experience, project approach, communication process, and creative resources outlined in this proposal, our references offer the most authentic testimony of our work.
We encourage the selection committee to call our clients and tour our facilities. They highlight our commitment to service and design excellence.
Our collective team is committed to providing efficient and creative solutions that will help stretch your project dollars with impactful design. We design facilities with life -cycle costs and long- term value in mind, maximizing flexibility and functionality while creating a fun place where the community comes together and lasting memories are made.
If awarded this project, BRS will enter into a negotiated agreement with the City of Lathrop to provide all the services outlined in our proposal within the required timeline and budget, and comply with the terms of the contract.
Should you have any questions or need additional materials, please do not hesitate to contact us directly. Thank you for your consideration.
Craig Bouck, AIA
Principal -in -Charge
303. 455. 1366
craigbouck@brsarch. com
YKc.(. vrx. 14,0,
Melissa Ford, AIA, LEED AP
Project Manager
720. 370. 6119
melissaford@brsarch. com
BARKER RINKER SEACAT ARCHITECTURE I PAGE 1
304
n
HARKER
RINKER
SEACAT
BARKER RINKER SEACAT ARCHITECTURE
50 years designing
spaces that bring
people together
40 years providing
planning &
analysis studies
PUBLIC RECREATION
is our primary business focus
1 million square feet of
community recreation
facilities benchmarked
FIRM PROFILE
Designing great places for communities has been the driving passion of BRS since its early beginnings five decades ago. With six principals, ten senior associates, a total firm of 40, and offices in Denver and Dallas, our mission and commitment are the same today as they were then. By putting the client' s needs first and remaining true to architectural excellence, we have been at the forefront of innovative design. We have assisted more than 350 organizations across the country in the strategic planning, master planning, programming and design of community facilities.
Community recreation centers, active adult centers, aquatic centers, and athletic complexes are the focus of our practice. The thread that runs through them all is our commitment to an interactive process that includes our clients in the design and development of their project. Decision makers must often navigate through an obstacle course of stakeholder groups and agency review, trying to balance the needs of all. We help facilitate " best -value" decisions unique to each organization. How do we do it? We wear many hats. We' r artists and analysts, mapmakers and MacGyvers, sages and band leaders, shepherds and scouts.
We design buildings and places that bring people together. We' d love to work with you.
DENVER
990 S. Broadway # 222
Denver, CO 80209
DALLAS
129 S. Main ST. #250
Grapevine, TX 76051
PAGE 2 I BARKER RINKER SEACAT ARCHITECTURE
305
ti
i
t4
fir///`
s
6tIl"
1111
7/
1117/ 114/ 14/
Alf
471
306
Stephen G. Terrell Recreati `; enter - Aden, TX
307
APPROACH TO PROJECT
At BRS, we believe in and are guided by a design process focused on making a positive and lasting impact that will improve the quality of life for the communities we serve. From this perspective, we strive to create thoughtful, functional places that enrich the lives of their users. We do not have a one -size -fits -all approach to design; instead, the design emerges from carefully addressing the project -specific requirements and the desires of the greatest number of constituents possible.
To help Lathrop reach its project goals and create an unparalleled user experience for all patrons, we must diligently and continually refine the budget, program, and project schedule. We like to think of this balance as three sides of an equilateral triangle. The entire team must give all three equal attention throughout the project. Surrounding the triangle is operations, which is a key focus in our design thinking for long- term success and sustainability. Our role is to guide the team and provide leadership in keeping the triangle balanced throughout the process with the resources available while simultaneously creating a unique facility that reflects Lathrop' s history, culture, values, aspirations and identity.
PROJECT DELIVERABLES
1) SITE ASSESSMENT
Oce '
OPERATIONS ,
SCHEDULE
Our team will visit the site to review and document existing site conditions. We will conduct a visual assessment of the site, identify views to existing site features such as the river and other visual corridors that could be preserved or enhanced, review access to existing trails, viewpoints and scenic areas nearby from the site, and review pedestrian access points to the site.
2) PROJECT DESIGN PROGRAMMING
BRS brings a deep understanding of design expertise for indoor recreation and community centers to consider programming from an up -front planning and long- term operational perspective. We advocate for balancing your service objectives with revenue considerations. We believe a good community center project offers " something for all" yet should be planned to minimize subsidy requirements. Making patron utilization projections a visible part of the early planning process can help decide which programs and amenities to include in your project. In the process, our team will actively review existing shared facilities and services as well as engage staff regarding their opinions on the needs of the community. Should the City of Lathrop desire to do so, BRS can also assist with community engagement and outreach, stakeholder interviews, and surveys, leveraging our knowledge of national trends.
Based on our findings, BRS will develop a program summary noting the key activities and programs for participants, area requirements, and adjacencies. Instrumental in this process is the understanding of the capital costs of each of the potential spaces of the complex. We will use our expert knowledge of the cost of each space type, size, and features to make sure that the program proposed is in line with the City' s budget. Through a team process based on prioritization and refinement, we will ensure your needs and goals are met. (Please see the Appendix to learn about the proprietary tools and approach we use for program refinement.)
The design team will also develop outdoor programming opportunities for the site. This process starts by analyzing the projected user capacity for the facility and outdoor programs, and a calendar of events for the facility, developed by staff to help determine the requirements for regular and event vehicular access and parking. Our team will develop a site programming diagram/ sketch describing placement of outdoor amenities including multi - use sports fields, splash pad, and concert/ event venue. Placement shall consider recommendations in the site assessment phase, ideal solar orientation, aural and visual qualities, site pedestrian circulation, and access through the site. 3) CONCEPTUAL DESIGN BUILDING RENDERINGS INCLUDING SITE PLANS AND ESTIMATED COSTS As part of the Community Center Complex planning process, BRS will create three unique conceptual designs that will illustrate the potential for the facility that will be a prominent destination, community anchor, and iconic landmark for Lathrop. We will work with the team in developing conceptual representations that are unique to the City and are reflective of the people, place, and pace of life in the community. Concept graphics will highlight the potential for the center in 2D and 3D graphics and visualization. ( See the Appendix for details on our methodology for designing spaces unique to their communities.)
BARKER RINKER SEACAT ARCHITECTURE I PAGE 5
308
APPROACH TO PROJECT
4) PRESENTATION FOR CITY COUNCIL
BRS has over 40 years of experience working closely with municipalities and public entities, specializing in planning and analysis studies for public recreation spaces, including presenting the results to City Councils. We will develop a comprehensive and visually engaging presentation for Lathrop' sCity Council that will encompass our three key concepts along with their corresponding estimates. We excel in navigating the unique challenges of public sector projects, from coordinating with local governments to engaging stakeholders and ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements. Our proven track record reflects our deep understanding of the planning process, budget constraints, and the importance of creating spaces that foster community engagement and long- term value.
PROPOSED SCHEDULE
We anticipate your project to require approximately 20 weeks from Notice to Proceed.
PROJECT SCHEDULE
iv' AY JUNE JUL AUK Sci-' i L
WEEKS
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Pre -Workshop # 1 Meeting with Executive Team
Project Award - Notice to Proceed
Work Period # 1 & Committee Workshop # 1
Site Assessment
Project Design Programming
Work Period # 2 & Committee Workshop # 2
Conceptual Design c. 41111IIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Cost Estimating
Work Period# 3 & Council Presentation IP
Council Presentation Prep
SHAPE KEY
O
WORK PERIOD
BIWEEKLY VIRTUAL CHECK - INS
IN - PERSON WORKSHOP
MILESTONE
Our process schedule is organized around three in -person Workshops. In between Workshops, we will conduct virtual check - in meetings on a bi- weekly basis. In addition, BRS will attend the City Council meeting in -person to help present the final three concepts.
Before our first Workshop, we will start the Multi - Purpose Community Center Complex project with a Kick -Off Meeting with key members from the client side to align aims and goals for the Big Vision, budget and schedule and confirm the overall process and metrics of success. (See more details on our Workshop process in the Appendix.)
REALIZING YOUR VISION
The City of Lathrop envisions a dynamic, multi -generational community hub on a 25 -acre site. This new farmhousethemed complex will celebrate Lathrop' shistory while offering diverse recreational, educational, and social opportunities. The facility will feature flexible indoor and outdoor spaces, including a multi - court gymnasium, a large
banquet hall, a performing arts theater, dedicated centers for seniors and teens, various classrooms and studios, a fitness center, multiple sports fields and a splash pad. The design will prioritize innovative, multi -use spaces to maximize community participation and create a landmark destination for Lathrop.
At BRS, we recognize the importance of creating an exciting and inclusive experience for Lathrop' scitizens. Our passion is creating a vision, a story, and a narrative that captures your goals for the complex with an authentic architectural design rooted in Lathrop' sPeople, Place, and Pace of life. We are eager to learn more and develop a design with you that truly reflects who you want to be as a community.
PAGE 6 I BARKER RINKER SEACAT ARCHITECTURE
309
o` d' 1rn Farmhouse - Inspired Design
335 -Seat Theatre
Berthoud Recreation Center - Berthoud, CO
Thornton Active Adult - Thornton, CO
Northglenn Recreation Center, Senior Center & Parsons Theatre - Northglenn, CO sr•:
YIii"!'
1111aM1
310
Gypsum Recreation Center - Gypsum, CO
BASE Community Center - Big Sky Montana
iii
311
ORGANIZATION CHART
I
CITY OF LATHROP
BARKER
RINKER N
SEACAT BRSDESIGARCHITECTURETEAM LEAD
ARCHITECTURE
CRAIG BOUCK, AAA, LEED AP CHRIS COSENZA
PRINCIPAL -IN -CHARGE DESIGN MANAGER
MELISSA FORD, AAA, LEED AP JENNA KATSAROS
PROJECT MANAGER, PRIMARY CONTACT FACILITY PERFORMANCE ADVISOR
SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLANNING & DESIGN
JOSE DE JESUS LEAL, PLA, ASIA
PRINCIPAL -IN -CHARGE
KARTHIK KUMAR
PROJECT MANAGER
OSCAR JOHNSON, PLA, CPRS
SPORTS FACILITIES SPECIALIST
r
suNTS INC.
COST ESTIMATION
BLUNDALL ASSOCIATES
MARTYN R. BLUNDALL
PRINCIPAL - IN -CHARGE
BARKER RINKER SEACAT ARCHITECTURE I PAGE 9
312
PROJECT TEAM
CONSULTANT TEAM ORGANIZATION
BRS has assembled an exceptionally qualified team to assist the City of Lathrop in the design and construction of your new multi -purpose community center complex. Our team:
has more than 50 years experience in public architecture and designing for communities — places to learn, work and play
is a nationally -recognized leader in design and renovation of community recreation facilities and interactive design
designs contextually — historically, culturally, and with an operational mindset includes consultant team members for landscape, site planning, and cost estimation who have worked together extensively on previous projects
champions sustainable solutions
has current knowledge of local construction cost and approval process, including experience with publicly - funded projects
is committed to client service
is fun to work with and excited about your project!
The consultant team is identified below, along with a
summary of the responsibilities of each team member.
DESIGN ARCHITECT/ PROJECT LEAD - Barker Rinker Seacat Architecture Address:
Contact:
990
Craig
S
Bouck,
Broadway, #
AIA, LEED
222,
AP,
Denver,
Principal- in- Charge/ Partner -
CO 80209
craigbouck@brsarch. com
Web Site: www. brsarch. com Telephone: 303. 455. 1366
Responsibilities: Barker Rinker Seacat Architecture ( BRS) will lead and orchestrate the project and team, provide Owner -Architect contract administration, Architect - Consultant contract administration and coordination of consultant services. BRS will provide design of three alternative design concepts including conceptual images, estimated cost, and conceptual site plans for each, incorporating cost- effective building technology and minimizing operational expenditures. Through collaboration with our consultant team, BRS will review and evaluate existing data, provide program plan, lead the project through conceptual study process, and present the results to City Council.
SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLANNING & DESIGN - MIG ( Berkeley)
Address:
Contact:
800
Karthik
Hearst
Kumar,
Avenue,
PLA, ASLA, Project Manager - kkumar@migcom. com
Berkeley, CA 94710
Website: www. migcom. co Telephone: 510. 845. 7549 x1340 Responsibilities: Site assessment, site planning, and landscape planning services.
COST ESTIMATING - Blundall Associates
Contact: Martyn Blundall, Principal -in -Charge - mblundall@blundall. com Address: 7223 Engle Road, Fort Wayne, IN 46804
Website: www. blundall. com Telephone: 260. 489. 8444
Responsibilities: Cost estimating services.
PAGE 10 I BARKER RINKER SEACAT ARCHITECTURE
313
TIME COMMITMENT
30%
EDUCATION
University of Pennsylvania
Master ofArchitecture
Stanford University
Bachelor of Arts in Urban Studies
University of Colorado Denver
Graduate School of Policy
Denver Community Leadership Forum
SPEAKING ENGAGEMENTS
2024 Texas Recreation and Parks
Society Annual Conference
Galveston, TX " Community Recreation
Center Design Glitches & Building
Blunders"
2023 CAPRD Conference I Yosemite,
CA " The Program Card Game"
2023 Texas Recreation and Parks
Society Annual Conference I Frisco,
TX " A Custodian' sTale"
2022 Florida Recreation & Park
Association Annual Conference
Orlando, FL " Hindsight is 20/0: What
Would You Do Differently?"
PUBLICATIONS
2021 Athletic Business: "Designing
Facilities with Maintenance in Mind"
YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
BRS: 30
Total: 35
craigbouck@brsarch. com
CRAIG BOUCK, AIA, LEED AP
PRINCIPAL - IN - CHARGE
1 WJ
Carla Madison Recreation Center - Denver, Colorado
BARKER
RINKER
SEACAT
ncn rEcrunE
An extremely talented and creative designer, Craig works with recreation professionals on all aspects of the practice from feasibility studies to detailed design to create value -driven projects that solve problems, create opportunities, and build community. Craig is a frequent speaker and author in the recreation, active adult, and aquatic facility design industry.
RECENT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
CORE Recreation Center Elk Grove, California
Grand Junction Recreation Center Grand Junction, Colorado Castle Rock Recreation Center Cast/ e Rock, Colorado
The Center of Recreational Excellence Hobbs, New Mexico Carla Madison Recreation Center Denver, Colorado
Moorhead Recreation Center Aurora, Colorado
The Beacon Multigenerational Recreation Center Arlington, Texas THRIVE Multigenerational Recreation Center Lewisville, Texas Las Cruces Regional Recreation & Aquatic Center Las Cruces, New Mexico Sammamish Community Aquatic Center Sammamish, Washington Larkspur Center Expansion and Renovation Bend, Oregon
Norman Oklahoma Aquatic and Multipurpose Sports Center Norman, Oklahoma Palmdale Regional Recreation Center Study Palmdale, California Palm Springs Community Center Study Palm Springs, California North Long Beach Community Recreation Center Study Long Beach, California North Tahoe Recreation Center Concept Design Study Tahoe, California The Salvation Army Ray & Joan Kroc Corps Community Center Design Charrette San Diego, California
Tehachapi Community Recreation Center Study Tehachapi, California Truckee Community Center Study Truckee, California
Arroyo Grande Regional Recreation Center Arroyo Grande, California BARKER RINKER SEACAT ARCHITECTURE I PAGE 11
314
TIME COMMITMENT
40%
EDUCATION
University of Colorado at Boulder
Bachelor of Environmental Design ( with
honors)
PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES
ARE 5. 0 Project Management Forms
Assembly Committee (2023-025)
ARE 5. 0 Project Management Case
Study Committee ( 2019-022)
American Institute of Architects
Judge: Masonry Institute of
Washington Excellence in Masonry
Design Awards 2014
Denver Architectural Foundation CAL
Project Volunteer
AWARDS
Ron Rinker Prize - 2023
AIA Colorado Fisher Traveling
Scholarship - 2018
YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
BRS: 10
Total: 17
melissaford@brsarch. com
r Berthoud Recreation Center - Berthoud, Colorado
MELISSA FORD, AIA, LEED AP
PROJECT MANAGER
BARKER
RINKER
SEACAT
RIIECIRRE
With over a decade of experience in community -focused design at BRS, Melissa specializes in guiding multi -stakeholder teams through every stage of the design process, ensuring functional, contextual, and budget - conscious solutions tailored to each project' s unique needs. As a collaborative leader, Melissa is adept at efficiently presenting viable options, allowing stakeholders to make informed decisions that align with project goals. If selected, she will serve as the primary point of contact and the design team lead, ensuring seamless communication and project continuity.
RECENT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Castle Rock Sport Center Castle Rock, Colorado
Grand Junction Recreation Center Grand Junction, Colorado South Lake Tahoe Recreation Center South Lake Tahoe, California The Center of Recreational Excellence ( CORE) Hobbs, New Mexico Carla Madison Recreation Center Denver, Co/ orado
The LINC ( Library and Innovation Center) Greeley, Colorado Berthoud Recreation Center at Waggener Farm Park Berthoud, Colorado Windsor Community Recreation Center Expansion Windsor, Colorado Eaton Community Center Eaton, Colorado
Northglenn Recreation Center, Senior Center and Parsons Theatre Northglenn, Colorado
Capital Sports Complex Charleston, West Virginia
Montrose Recreation Center Montrose, Colorado
Idaho Outdoor Fieldhouse Boise, Idaho
Goodson Recreation Center Aquatics Area Renovation Centennial, Colorado The MARQ Southlake Southlake, Texas
Melissa Sports Park Melissa, Texas
Meridian Family YMCA Meridian, Idaho
Northern Regional Recreation Center Cornelius, North Carolina The Salvation Army Ray and Joan Kroc Corps Community Center Renovation Omaha, Nebraska
PAGE 12 I BARKER RINKER SEACAT ARCHITECTURE
315
TIME COMMITMENT
40%
EDUCATION
University of Colorado at Boulder
Bachelor of Environmental Science
YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
BRS: 7
Total: 19
chriscosenza@brsarch. com
CHRIS COSENZA
DESIGN MANAGER
I Al'
lie Bridge Sports Complex - Bridgeport, West Virginia
BARKER
RINKER
SEACAT
mcu, TECIUB,
With an innate passion for the outdoors, Chris settled roots in Colorado as fast as he could at age 18. This love of the outdoors inspires his design aesthetic and he believes that a good building should draw from its surroundings rather than compete with them.
He loves problem -solving and has a natural curiosity about how things work together that he uses to work out all the kinks in design.
RECENT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
CORE Recreation Center Elk Grove, California
Trail Winds Recreation Center Thornton, Colorado
Bridgeport Indoor Sports Complex Design Bridgeport, Connecticut Wheatlands YMCA Aurora, Colorado
Goodyear Park Master Plan Goodyear, Arizona
Staunton State Park Phase III Design Services Pine, Colorado Chatfield Camper Registration Building Chatfield, Colorado Golden Civic Center Master Plan Golden, Colorado
University of Northern Colorado Butler Hancock Renovations & Addition* Gree/ ey, Colorado
Creighton University Rasmussen Fitness & Sports Center* Omaha, Nebraska Williston Area Recreation Center* Williston, North Dakota University of Northern Arizona Aquatics and Tennis Center* Flagstaff, Arizona Western State Colorado University Mountaineer Field House* Gunnison, Colorado
experience while working at other firms
BARKER RINKER SEACAT ARCHITECTURE I PAGE 13
316
EDUCATION
Metropolitan State University of Denver
Bachelor of Arts in Recreation
Management
SPEAKING ENGAGEMENTS
2025 Texas Recreation and Parks
Society Annual Conference I Allen, TX
Cultivating Commitment: Fostering
Retention in Recreation Staff"
2024 National Recreation & Park
Assoc. Conference I Atlanta, GA
Cultivating Commitment: Fostering
Retention in Recreation Staff"
2023 National Recreation & Park
Assoc. Conference I Dallas, TX " Not
in My Lane: Startling Revelations on
Public Recreation' sImpact on Private
Fitness Providers"
AWARDS
2017 City of Aurora Spirit of
Community Service Award - received
for ongoing volunteer work &
advocacy of youth and families
experiencing homelessness
YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
BRS: 5
Total: 21
jennakatsaros@brsarch. com
Northern Regional Recreation Center - Cornelius, North Carolina
JENNA KATSAROS
FACILITY PERFORMANCE ADVISOR
BARKER
RINKER
SEACAT
I ACAIIECTLAF
An accomplished Park and Recreation professional, Jenna joined BRS after working in the City of Aurora, Colorado for over 15 years. Her insight and first- hand experience working with government recreation systems provides each of her projects a unique perspective and an understanding for our clients needs. In her role as Facility Performance Advisor, she takes on the difficult task on finding the balance between community desires and the realities of the project constraints. Her expertise in planning, public engagement, and operational analysis helps clients to optimize facility participation, utilization and cost recovery goals.
RECENT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Grand Junction Community Recreation Center Study Grand Junction, Colorado Lexington Recreation Feasibility Study Lexington, North Caro/ ina Mansfield Recreation Center Study Mansfield, Texas
Sapulpa Recreation Center Feasibility Study Sapulpa, Oklahoma Recreation Center Performance Analysis Laramie, Wyoming Royal Gorge Recreation District Feasibility Study Canon City, Colorado PenMet Community Recreation Center Feasibility Study Gig Harbor, Washington Greater Midland Community Center Study Midland, Michigan Idaho Outdoor Field House Boise, Idaho
The REC of Grapevine Performance Analysis Grapevine, Texas Georgetown Recreation Center Feasibility Study Georgetown, Texas Reecy Davis Sr. Recreation Center Greenville, Texas
Greenville Sports Park Recreation Center Greenville, Texas Aquatic and Community Center at Heather Farm Park Walnut Creek, California Round Rock Recreation Needs Assessment Round Rock, Texas Georgetown Recreation Center Feasibility Study Georgetown, Texas Northwest Oklahoma Natatorium Study Woodward, Oklahoma
Riverdale Regional Park Master Plan Brighton, Colorado
Garland Senior Center Renovation Garland, Texas
PAGE 14 I BARKER RINKER SEACAT ARCHITECTURE
317
ROLE ON THIS PROJECT
Principal - in -Charge
TIME COMMITMENT:
20%
EDUCATION
BS, Landscape Architecture,
University of California, Davis
REGISTRATIONS /
CERTIFICATIONS
Landscape Architect:
CA # 5429
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
American Society of
Landscape Architecture
American Society of
Landscape Architecture
Diversity Summit Community
Member
American Planning
Association Tribal and
Indigenous Planning Division
Latinos and Planning Division
of APA
Indigenous Society of
Architects, Planners, and
Designers
Jose de Jesus Leal, PLA, ASLA
PRINCIPAL/ LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT/ DIRECTOR, NATIVE NATION
BUILDING STUDIO I MIG
Jose Leal is a Principal, Director of the Native Nation Building Studio, and landscape architect with a strong background in project management and design and planning for both public and private projects. Jose is skilled in a broad range of project development tasks, including site analysis, design development, construction documentation and construction observation.
His project experience includes preparation of numerous construction documents sets from start to finish, including cost estimates and technical specifications. Jose brings over 26 years of experience and a strong design sensibility to his project work and emphasizes context sensitive solutions wherever possible.
Jose' sexperience includes both collaborating and leading multi - disciplinary teams on a wide range of projects ranging from Native Nation building to higher education projects. In landscape architecture, he has found a path to continuous discovery and a means for connecting people to people and people to place in an authentic and simplistic fashion. To Jose, every project represents an opportunity to build on the collective knowledge of clients, community members, colleagues, and the place itself. His work ethic and tenacity ensure a steady generation of new ideas and solutions, and his technical expertise enables him to translate visions into physical form. With his respectful nature and integrity, Jose develops long-asting relationships with his clients.
SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Los Altos Community Center, City of Los Altos, CA
Newark Civic Center, City of Newark, CA
Santee Community Center — Phase 1, City of Santee, CA
Contra Costa County Administration Building, Martinez, CA Edenvale Community Center, City of San Jose, CA
University of California, Student Athletic Performance Center, Davis, CA Father Alfred E Boeddeker Park, City of San Francisco, CA Shasta- Takelma Indigenous Learning Garden, Southern Oregon University, Ashland, OR
Yanaguana Garden, HPARC, City of San Antonio, TX
UC Davis C. N. Gorman Museum, Davis, CA
UC Davis Center for Companion Health Memorial Garden, Davis, CA 318
ROLE ON THIS PROJECT
Project Manager
TIME COMMITMENT:
40%
EDUCATION
MLA, College of Design,
University of Minnesota
Post - Baccalaureate Certificate
in Metropolitan Design,
University of Minnesota
BArch, Sushant School of Art
and Architecture, Gurgaon,
India
REGISTRATIONS
Landscape Architect:
CA # 6951
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
American Society of
Landscape Architects
AWARDS
2023 AIA California Design
Award - Climate Action
The Lighthouse, South
San Francisco ( w/ Gensler
Architects)
2020 ASLA Honor Award India
Basin ( w/ Bionic Landscape)
M
Karthik Kumar, PLA, ASLA
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DESIGN/ LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT I MIG For nearly two decades, Karthik has worked to create landscapes that serve as a " canvas for interaction" between place, nature, community, and culture.
Karthik' s
process begins with a deep understanding of the community served by the project, its history and culture. Pairing this understanding with knowledge of the site, its features and constraints, allows him to reveal the essence of the place and explore its potential through design.
As Director of Community Design at MIG' s Berkeley headquarters, Karthik applies his technical design acumen and management skills to lead complex projects and mentor site teams. His creative and technical proficiency is evident in the breadth and diversity of his experience, which include expansive civic, corporate and healthcare campuses with parks, sports facilities, play areas, plazas, gardens, circulation spaces and streetscapes. Karthik has managed many of these projects from concept through construction. He enjoys the cross -disciplinary collaboration and meticulous coordination required to resolve site and programmatic complexity, and deliver projects where building and landscape together create a seamless place and experience.
Visionary while pragmatic, Karthik seeks to deliver innovative and beautiful solutions that are widely accessible and inclusive, while authentically reflecting client and community aspirations.
SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE
West Valley College, Physical Education and Wellness Center, Saratoga, CA Contra Costa County Administration Building, Martinez, CA Heritage Plaza, Park and Streetscapes, Downtown Fort Worth, TX Almaden Lake Park All -Inclusive Playground, San Jose, CA Florida Avenue Park AII- Inclusive Playground, San Bruno, CA Jollyman Park all -Inclusive Playground ( QA, Construction Support), Cupertino, CA
Powell Streetscape Redesign, Emeryville, CA
Eagle Plaza, SoMa, San Francisco CA*
India Basin Mixed Use Development (Community Park and Plaza, Bay Trail and Streetscape), San Francisco CA*
Gateway Campus Center ' The Lighthouse', South San Francisco, CA* Genentech Campus Center and Plaza, South San Francisco, CA* Google Cloud Campus ( Campus Plazas, Sports Courts and Fields, Campus Amenities, Green Infrastructure), Sunnyvale CA*
Campus Identity, Streetscapes & Shuttle Stops ( Multi Year project) Genentech, South San Francisco, CA*
Emery Yards Life Sciences Campus ( QA and Construction Support), Emeryville CA*
Torrey View Life Sciences Campus, Breakthrough Properties, San Diego, CA*
Completed prior to MIG
319
ROLE ON THIS PROJECT
Consulting Principal / Sports
Facilities Specialist
TIME COMMITMENT
10%
EDUCATION
BSLA, California State
Polytechnic University,
Pomona
REGISTRATIONS
Landscape Architect:
CA # 6481
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
California Parks & Recreation
Society ( CPRS)
AWARDS
Los Angeles Business
Council, Award of Excellence,
Wishing Tree Park, 2024
SCC ASLA Quality of Life
Merit Award: Anaheim
Coves, 2014
SCC ASLA Merit Award
in Landscape Art: South
Beach Promenade, 2007
Oscar Johnson, PLA, CPRS
PRINCIPAL / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT I MIG
Oscar Johnson always had a passion for drawing and creating, and he' s been fulfilling it as a landscape architect and project manager for almost three decades. Oscar started as a landscape designer at MIG. His steady rise to firm principal is the result of his meticulous attention to detail and dedication to unwavering quality and customer service.
From multimillion dollar sports facilities to intimate neighborhood parks, Oscar has designed and managed construction for various public and private projects throughout California. He develops cost- effective construction details and design specifications that can be built to last.
He is adept in establishing a camaraderie with clients, colleagues, and contractors to shepherd projects from design to ribbon -cutting. Oscar is proactive in reducing risks and applying new technologies and materials to his designs. He describes himself as " a build - a -better - mousetrap type of person," who takes the Big Picture and fills in the fine lines. While his work has benefited people in many communities, Oscar particularly appreciates providing physical, mental, and emotional stimulation to children with disabilities through his work —facilitating their interaction with nature and with others.
SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Big League Dreams, Las Vegas, NV
Tustin Legacy Veterans Sports Park, Tustin, CA
Anaheim Coves Phases 1 and 2, Anaheim, CA
Arnold Cypress Park, Cypress, CA
MLK Park, Bakersfield, CA
Compton Creek Nature Park, Compton, CA
Dills Park Renovation/ Expansion, Paramount, CA
Huntington Beach Pier Plaza and South Beach Renovation, Huntington Beach, CA
Fullerton Parks Renovation — Adlena, Byerrum, and Valencia, Manteca, CA
Grace Park, Long Beach, CA
Greenleaf Parkway SCE Easement Improvements, Compton, CA Lambert Park, El Monte, CA
Liberty Park Renovation, Cerritos, CA
Mendez Tribute Monument Park, Westminster, CA
Parks & Recreation Facilities Master Plan, Westminster, CA Pico Park Renovation, Pico Rivera, CA
Ponderosa Park, Anaheim, CA
25 Westminster Parks Renovations, Westminster, CA
BARKER RINKER SEACAT ARCHITECTURE I PAGE 17
320
Martyn R. Blundall
Principal -in -Charge - Estimating
Blundall Associates, Inc.
Martyn has experience in the cost estimating field that spans over 50 years and established Blundall Associates in 1980. Among his many duties, Martyn performs the
final quality control check of completed estimates
including confirmation that all major design elements
are within historical cost ranges); consults with senior estimators during the preparation of estimates and
researches project specific local labor and materials
prices and market conditions.
Martyn' sconsiderable skills, experience, and judgment
come into focus when providing conceptual estimates
from limited information on scope and limited detailed
design engineering data.
Education
England: Five years of professional education in
Construction Management, Estimating and Quantity
Surveying, Value Engineering and Life Cycle Costing:
1967- 68 Hall Green Tech. College, 1968- 71
Birmingham Polytechnical College, 1971- 72 Salford
University
Experience
Cost Evaluations of Facility Master Planning Studies
Construction Market Research Studies
Renovation of Existing Facilities
MEP Infrastructure Upgrades
Additions to Existing Facilities
New Construction
Site Development/ Site Infrastructure Upgrades
Affiliations
ASPE
ASPE Chapter 65
BCA of Northeast Indiana
The Consulting Estimators Roundtable
USGBC
Time Commitment for City of Lathrop
Multi - Purpose Community Center Complex
15%
Relevant Project Experience
Abilene Rec Center Feasibility Study, Abilene, TX*
Billings Community Rec Center Study, Billings, MT*
Bridgeport Indoor Sports & Rec Cen., Bridgeport, WV*
Castle Rock Sport Center, Castle Rock, CO*
Chico Area Recreation & Park District Aquatic Facility
Recreation Center, Chico, CA*
Denver Westwood Rec Center, Denver, CO
Garland Sr. Activity Center ( new), Garland, TX*
Grand Junction Comm. Rec Cen., Grand Junction, CO*
Greater Midland Community Center, Midland, MI*
Idaho Adaptive Fieldhouse, Boise, ID*
Morse Recreation Center, Elk Grove, CA*
PenMet Parks Community Rec Cen., Gig Harbor, WA*
Redmond Regional Rec Center, Redmond OR*
Sportspark Recreation Center ( New), Greenville, TX*
Stephen G. Terrell Recreation Center, Allen, TX*
Tumbleweed Rec Center Expansion, Chandler, AZ*
Projects completed alongside Barker Rinker Seacat
Architecture
PAGE 18 I BARKER RINKER SEACAT ARCHITECTURE
321
pess Area
Multi -Use Space: Climbing Wall & Ha
Idaho Outdoor Fieldhouse - Boise, ID
W Y
Moorhead Recreation Center - Aurora, CO
thoud Recreation Center - Berthoud, CO
322
Indoor Soccer Field House
4; 0, 50,
r
Berthoud Recreation Center - Berthoud, CO
Center of Recreational Excellence - Hobbs, NM
323
ADDITIONAL SERVICES
OPERATIONS PROFORMA
We understand the City is seeking cost estimates for
staffing and maintenance as part of the Conceptual
Design deliverable. BRS' in- house Facility Performance Advisor, Jenna Katsaros, will skillfully provide this service.
Additionally, we are able to provide a full Operations
Proforma, which includes the following:
Market Assessment
Analysis of current and projected demographic
trends
Establishment of Primary and Secondary
service areas
Research on existing recreation and fitness
provider services and fees
Proforma Components
Cost recovery philosophy
Affirmation of current approach or
establishment of new objectives
Service Hours
Analysis of existing service hours and
recommendations for adjustments, if necessary
Staff Analysis
Development of facility organizational structure,
or review and recommendation on existing
staffing levels to meet customer service
expectations and cost recovery goals
Operational Expense Budget
Full- time staffing needs
Part- time staffing needs ( Lifeguards,
Custodial, Maintenance, etc.)
Utilities
Contractual service needs ( janitorial,
maintenance, etc.)
Supplies needs ( pool chemicals, custodial,
office, recreation, etc.)
Marketing
Credit card fees
Computer/ Software services
Capital repair and replacement
Insurance
Revenue & Cost Recovery Projections
Attendance estimates
Admission fees and passes
Program registrations
Rentals
Vending
Benchmarking
Comparison of facility spaces, capacities, and prices
of peer facilities
IIMMI Zan
AMARA- WE SER, ICE PRO/ IDEAS
YTEI AIMEFMMM
sarsiA,. uMMM l Mt
MARKET AMAETSK
f
I IIESOMEEMMI
r
r .
MSS 1 MUM
Examples of past pro forma business plan pages
created by BRS as part of a larger study.
BARKER RINKER SEACAT ARCHITECTURE I PAGE 21
324
ADDITIONAL SERVICES
The following service can also be provided by the BRS team at an additional cost:
TOURS OF EXISTING LOCAL OR NON - LOCAL RECREATION CENTERS Touring existing community and recreation centers offers invaluable insight into successful program solutions, design standards, and operational best practices. By visiting a range of facilities, stakeholders can experience firsthand how different spaces function, gain a deeper understanding of industry trends, and learn from facility operators about what works well —and what challenges to anticipate. This benchmarking exercise helps inform feasibility studies and concept design, ensuring that proposed solutions align with community needs, operational efficiency, and long- term sustainability. Ultimately, these tours serve as a critical foundation for making well- informed design and programming decisions.
PAGE 22 I BARKER RINKER SEACAT ARCHITECTURE
325
326
Hilliard Recreation & Wellness Campus - Hilliard, OH
Northern Regional Recreation Center - Cornelius, NC
327
BARKER
RINKER
SEAGAT
ARCHITECTURE
2/7/025
Lathrop Multipurpose Community Center Complex
FEE AND COST SUMMARY
afessional Service Fees
Task Fee
Pre -Workshop # 1 Meeting with Executive Team to establish Steering Committee, etc. 2, 650 Work Period # 1 & Committee Workshop # 1 32, 990
Work Period # 2 & Committee Workshop # 2 27, 870
Work Period # 3 & Committee Workshop # 3 S62, 390
Work Period # 4 & Town Council Presentation 14, 760
Total Base Fees 140, 660
Operations Proforma, shown in Workplan ( Optional)* 16, 985 Total Professional Service Fees 157, 645
Reimbursable Expenses - Not -to -exceed Allowance
Printing, travel, meals, etc. S16, 415
Total Reimbursable Allowance 16, 415
Reimbursab e expenses will be billec at 1. x actual cost Notes
1. All deliverables will be sent electronically in PDF format unless otherwise requested.
2. Proposal excludes photo - realistic renderings and/ or animations, these services can be provided at an additional cost.
3. All applicable California state sales tax is excluded from the cost of the proposal and will be billed in addition to the fee quoted.
4. The project scope and fee are based on the the project schedule as identified in this proposal. Major adjustments to the project schedule not caused by BRS or it' s Sub - Consultants may required additional services.
5. Site is assumed to be free of development or environmental hazards and will not require demolition or clean up. Environmental investigation not included.
6. Site survey and geotechnical report are not included in the base fee.
Please refer to our Workplan in the Appendix for a detailed breakdown of deliverables for each Task.
BARKER RINKER SEACAT ARCHITECTURE I PAGE 25
328
THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK
PAGE 26 I BARKER RINKER SEACAT ARCHITECTURE
329
CORE Recreation Center - Elk Grove, CA
330
Castle Rock Sport Center - Castle Rock, CO
Child Watch/ Classroom
331
BARKER
RINKER
SEACAT
CLIENT
Town of Castle Rock
CASTLE ROCK SPORT CENTER
REFERENCE
Jeff Smullen
Assistant Director of Parks & Recreation
303. 472. 0223
jsmullen@crgov. com
ASSOCIATE FIRMS
The Ballard Group
Blundall Associates
SIZE
145, 000 sf
CONSTRUCTION COST
61 Million ( est.)
COMPLETION
Design: Nov 2024
Construction: 2026 (est.)
Scan the QR code or click the
link below to watch a
fly -through of the final design:
www. youtu. be/ GlibescvnTI
PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Castle Rock, Colorado
The Castle Rock Sport Center is designed as a premier destination for sports performance, recreation, and community engagement, responding to the growing demand for high -quality athletic facilities. Anchored by gymnasium courts, a competition lap pool, and comprehensive fitness areas, the facility supports a broad range of youth and young adult competitive programs while ensuring ample spectator viewing areas.
At the heart of the design is a centralized hub that serves as a launching point for various recreational and competitive activities. With flexible, multi -use spaces, the facility allows for secure tournament configurations, ensuring functionality while maintaining accessibility to fitness and wellness amenities. A defining feature is the north -to -south concourse, which acts as both a primary circulation route and a spectator gathering space on event days.
The architectural design reflects Castle Rock' s industrial brickyard heritage, utilizing exposed materials, structural connections, and durable finishes that balance functionality with aesthetic appeal. The inclusion of multipurpose rooms, adventure track elements, and adaptable fitness spaces ensures the facility meets evolving recreation needs, much Tike Lathrop' svision for an inclusive, interactive, and community - driven complex. By integrating performance -based programming and partnerships, the Castle Rock Sports Center is poised to become a cornerstone of active living and community engagement for years to come.
BARKER RINKER SEACAT ARCHITECTURE I PAGE 29
332
BARKER
RINKER
SEACAT
CLIENT
City of Grand Junction
GRAND JUNCTION COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER
REFERENCE
Ken Sherbenou, MPA, CPRE
Parks and Recreation Director
970. 254. 3881
kensh@gjcity. org
ASSOCIATE FIRMS
Chamberlin Architects
The Ballard Group
Reese Hackman
Blundall Associates
SIZE
107, 000 sf
CONSTRUCTION COST
73 Million ( GMP est.)
COMPLETION
Design: Oct 2024
Construction: Aug 2027 ( est.)
PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Grand Junction, Colorado
The Grand Junction Community Recreation Center is the culmination of over two decades of community planning and support, designed to be a year- round hub for recreation, wellness, and social connection. This highly anticipated facility will offer multi - use, flexible spaces that adapt to the evolving needs of the community while incorporating sustainable design strategies to enhance efficiency and environmental responsibility.
Thoughtful site planning ensures seamless pedestrian circulation and strong connections between the recreation center, outdoor sports fields, an aquatics area, and future expansion opportunities. The building' sdesign is inspired by the natural beauty of the Grand Valley, integrating materials and forms that reflect the surrounding landscape.
With fitness and wellness areas, gathering spaces, classrooms, and an engaging aquatics experience, the center is designed to be more than just a recreational space — it will serve as a true community anchor, fostering engagement, inclusivity, and an active lifestyle for generations to come.
Scan the QR code or click the
link below to watch the final
public meeting presentation:
www. voutu. be/ 2scLiwfV0fM8
PAGE 30 I BARKER RINKER SEACAT ARCHITECTURE
333
334
The MARQ Legends Hall - Southlake, TX
Concert/ Event Venue Amphitheater
Banquet Room with Stage and Dividers
335
CLAIMS & SUITS
Please see below for information pertaining to our current litigation from past projects:
BRS is a third party to a dispute where we served as architect and the contractor is named in the claim.
EXCLUSIONS
Please refer to the notes on our Fee Summary ( page 25) for exclusions and assumptions.
BARKER RINKER SEACAT ARCHITECTURE I PAGE 33
336
THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK
PAGE 34 I BARKER RINKER SEACAT ARCHITECTURE
337
338
Carla Madison Recreation Center in Denver,
CO was designed with East High School
students in mind, ensuring it became an
accessible and inviting space for them.
A
pedestrian study informed the angled street -
level design, which preserves sightlines to the
historic high school while naturally guiding
student foot traffic toward the center. With its
multi -level layout, the building maximizes
space while maintaining
a strong connection
to the urban fabric of Colfax Avenue and
City Park. Features like the rooftop deck
and outdoor climbing wall createa dynamic,
engaging environment, making the recreation
centera natural extension of the student
experience beyond the classroom.
CITY PAR
EASI HICK SCHU0>.
339
APPENDIX A
APPROACH TO PROJECT - PROJECT DESIGN PROGRAMMING ( CONT.)
OPERATIONS ANALYSIS AND COST RECOVERY
Community center facilities are complex and must be well thought out in their programming and make up to serve the needs of the community while meeting realistic expense and revenue goals. We believe a good community recreation project offers " something for all" yet should be planned to minimize subsidy requirements. Making patron utilization projections a visible part of the early planning process can help decide which programs and amenities to include in your project. We can set you up to succeed by developing project goals and outlining expense and revenue projections budgets.
A variety of things can be examined, most often:
Performance goals for the project - Balancing desired activities with program space revenue potential Operating costs - Developing detailed budgets for expense and revenue projections Cost recovery - Establishing a goal based on the City' s philosophy regarding service level, accessibility, affordability, inclusion, and financial sustainability.
Operating logistics - Determining staffing levels, attendance estimates, fee structures and maintenance plans Our Facility Performance Advisor, Jenna Katsaros, will be your guide. As a former Parks and Recreation Superintendent and our Benchmark Network manager, she has the experience and expertise to help the Lathrop Multi -Purpose Community Center Complex establish performance expectations and achieve its operational goals.
THE CARD GAME
Establishing a program focused on common
goals and aims is essential. Early programming
exercises allow the project team and stakeholder
groups to prioritize what can be accomplished
with available funds. Through the programming
exercise, we want to maximize buy -in and support
from all stakeholders, outlining project priorities,
compromises, and goals.
We achieve this through our proprietary activity
called the " Program Card Game." This interactive
group exercise requires participants to help design
a custom facility program focused on space needs,
size, construction cost and relative operational/
cost recovery goals. We break out into groups, each
reviewing the available funds, discussing options,
and coming to a consensus about what they believe
the community wants and needs. We then discuss
each solution and collectively build an inclusive
facility vision. The outcome of the activity is a
healthy discussion about needs vs. wants, resulting
in a prioritized program meeting the budget,
targeting both operational and impact goals.
Craig leads a stakeholder group through the Card Game exercise Samples of the Card Game cards
BARKER RINKER SEACAT ARCHITECTURE I PAGE 37
340
APPENDIX B - SCOPE OF SERVICES & WORK PLAN
Activity/ Timeline Scope Description ( Tasks & Products) Duration Preparation for Pre - Workshop 01 BRS 1 week
Invoicing and Project Budget Management, Meeting Coordination, Travel Coordination, etc.
Prepare Kick- off meeting presentation
Gather project background information and review
Online Meeting ( OM)
Confirm
re -Workshop # 1 Meeting with Executive Team to estab ish Steering Committee, etc. ET, BRS 1 day Team Introduction
Request existing project information: plans, reports, etc., ( all existing data available) Time frame for work plan
Discuss Program Card Game Activity and participants
Dates for Workshops, Meetings and Presentations
Work Period #1 - Data Collection & Works Top Prep BRS 1 week Develop & schedule focus group, individual engagement & partnership outreach Collect and review all existing data available to include: Past planning efforts, surveys, current mission statements, P&R operational data, Lathrop development requirements and codes, budget information and limitations. Plans and detail information for the existing facilities.
Begin analyzing the information and develop initial considerations regarding options Prepare National Slide tour of potential recreation center program components Market, demographic, and alternative provider analysis considerations Prepare preliminary operational strategies and benchmarking data Prepare materials for Workshop 1
1. 2 BRS Trip 1 ( PIC, PM,
Day 1 Morning
Day 1 Afternoon
Day 2 Morning
r;sick
Corisid=
Considt
Consith.
Consith
Considt,
Considt
Consid4
Considt
Consid<.
Considc
Consid'
ConSidc
Considt
Workshop# 1 ET/ SC, BRS 2 Days
Site/ Facility Assessments - begin to identify opportunities and constraints ( Depending on # extra time/ days may be needed)
BRS Team Meeting with Executive Team
The City' s mission, vision, goals and objectives for the project Identify stakeholders, interest groups, etc.
Discuss Operational considerations & Cost Recovery Goals for the facility Market & Demographic Research Findings, National Benchmarks, Comparable Facilities Information Review market segment, demographic, and alternative provider analysis considerations Sustainability concepts and goals
Big Vision" program components
Play programming Card Game; Identify program elements
Discuss Total Project Budget ( Building, Site, Etc.)
Site Opportunities/ Constraints
Discuss financing options and ojectives
Preliminary Partnering Opportunities
Benchmark facility tours ( Optional)
Establish measures of success for the project
Tour Existing Community Facilities in Lathrop
Wor< Period # 2 - Pre iminary Site Assessment & Program Deve opment BRS 2 weeks Create meeting minutes and distribute
Develop draft mission and vision statements
Site conditions and site analysis write- up
Review work to date, surveys, program, plans, estimates and all previous data Develop Conceptual programming based on Workshop # 1 discussion and goals ( Limit 3 Programs)
Create options of proposed program spaces and area ( SF) requirements Create preliminary capital costs for each program
Create conceptual operational expenses and revenues models Craft the preliminary project Design Threads
CONTINUED ON OPPOSITE PAGE
PAGE 38 I BARKER RINKER SEACAT ARCHITECTURE
341
APPENDIX B - SCOPE OF SERVICES & WORK PLAN
Activity/ Timeline Scope Description ( Tasks & Products) Duration
2. 1
OM ( Date TBD)
Develop initial concept options based on feedback and ideal program elements identified in Workshop # 1 Develop initial farmhouse character imagery
Conduct an initial code review to understand constraints re: building code Revise operational expenses and revenues models costs and fee structure for preferred program Create site diagram showing preferred direction from various inputs Create preliminary project budget model spreadsheet and detailed capital cost estimate for construction Discuss Preliminary financing alternatives
Follow -Up with Fxecutive Team ( bi- weekly). ET, BRS
Facilitate an online meeting for preliminary review of above topics and distribute notes.
2. Trip 2 ( Dates TBD)
Day 1
Confirm
Confirm
Confirm
Confirm
Committee Workshop # 2 ET/ SC, BRS 1- 2 days
Present up to three programs based on feedback from online meeting.
Discuss program areas that may be impacted by partner involvement Discuss project budget and construction costs
Present operational expenses and revenues models costs and fee structure for preferred program Preliminary conceptual plan diagrams options & architectural character for preferred site, reflecting farmhouse vernacular. Select 3 preferred options.
Discuss potential funding options and if phasing or alternates might be required.
3. 0 Wor c Period # 3A - Program & Plan RefinementArchitectural Character Studies BRS 4 weeks Create meeting minutes from previous Workshop and distribute Revise program, as needed based on all input from previous Workshop Revise preferred program models & phasing options
Revise preliminary capital costs for each program
Refine the Mission Statement & Goals / Design Threads ( if necessary) Refine preliminary conceptual plan diagrams
Create massing and architectural character studies
Revise operational expenses and revenues models costs and fee structure for preferred program
3. 1
3. 2
OM ( Date TBD)
Work Period #3B - Renderings and Workshop Prep BRS
ET, BRS
4 weeks
Create presentation materials for Workshop 3
Refine preferred alternative site plan & Landscape options Refine 3D Modeling & select 3D views ( interior/ exterior) for each concept option Develop phasing options for sites and buildings ( if necessary) Refinement of Financing Alternatives
Refinement of Capital and Operating Cost Estimate
Refinement of project model spreadsheet and detailed capital cost estimate for construction based on work to date and selected program of amenities
Follow -Up with Executive Team Ibi- weekly)
Facilitate an online meeting for preliminary review of above topics and distribute notes.
3. 4
Trip 3 - Date TBD)
Day 1 Morning
3. 5
Day 1 Afternoon
Commit
Commit
Commit
Confirm
Commit
Committee Workshop # 3 ET/ SC, BRS 1- 2 days
Final project program and concept floor plans ( Limit 3 options) 3D massing models / architectural character options ( some additional refinement expected) Site plan priorities and preferences
Phasing and alternates to meet budget goals ( if needed) Total Project Budget. Optional: Operating Cost Estimate, Operational Cost Recovery Models & Findings, Rate Structure Findings, & Alternatives for Financing Review Project with Public Works and Agencies having Jurisdiction Discuss site / building plan diagrams with Planning, Fire, and Building Departments
4. 0
4. 1
OM ( Date TBD)
Work Period #4 - Pro c uce Final Feasibility & Conceptual Design Report and Graphics BRS
ET, BRS
6 weeks
Create meeting minutes from previous Workshop and distribute Update all work products based on input received in Workshop 3 Follow -Up with Executive Team ( bi- weekly)
Facilitate an online meeting for preliminary review of above topics and distribute notes.
4. 2 De iver Fina ReportLTawriCouncil Presentation ET, BRS 1 day BARKER RINKER SEACAT ARCHITECTURE I PAGE 39
342
APPENDIX C - SCHEDULE APPROACH
OWNERS DECISION MATRIX
We understand client team members and stakeholders
have ongoing work responsibilities and other
commitments. Nonetheless, many decisions must be
made throughout the project, which can add to an already busy workload and present scheduling challenges. In
response, we have developed an approach that eases
the decision - making
process by ensuring you
have the information you
need, when you need it,
to make informed and
educated decisions with
confidence.
BRS has developed a
proprietary tool called
the Owners Decision
Matrix ( ODM), a
scheduling document
customized to your
project. It identifies all critical decisions well in advance, giving your team time to fully understand the issues,
consider alternatives, and confidently make informed
decisions. The ODM is organized into three decision -
making stages, termed the " 3 Cs." The first is the
Consider" stage, during which we introduce and educate
the team on an upcoming decision point and timeframe.
This is an example of an ODM similar to what we will create for the Lathrop Mult- Purpose Community Center Complex.
We will use this document side -by -side with our project work plan and schedule. It provides the agenda for workshops and ensures major decisions are made in a
timely manner.
Confirm
Confirm
Commit
Commit
Commit
Co,,.;!& r
SD estimate and budget alignment
phasing, alternates, and value engineering
sequencing approach with CMAR
indoor play type, budget placeholder
commercial catering or warming kitchen
parking quantities/ layout
climbing wall RFP draft review
BRS HAS THE BEST PLANNING PROCESS. THEY
LET YOU SEE ALL THE OPTIONS AND PROVIDE
AN UNDERSTANDING OF THE COSTS. WITH
THEIR PROCESS, WE WERE ABLE TO MANAGE
EXPECTATIONS IN OUR COMMUNITY."
TERRI STOWERS, FORMER DIVISION DIRECTOR
MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Then, at the next Client Workshop, we will discuss the
issue in depth, having had time to consider the decision and narrow choices. We then " Confirm" the direction in which we are heading. In a subsequent meeting, the team finalizes the choice and will " Commit" to the decision.
Our goal with this tool is to focus project Workshops and decisions on topics relevant to each project stage. We
strive to keep the process
moving forward by minimizing
backtracking due to hasty or
uninformed decisions.
WORKSHOPS
Central to the execution of the
ODM is the proper facilitation of
project Workshops. These are
key in helping us maintain and
manage schedules for complex
projects like yours. Each
Workshop is a well -planned
event that brings together
key participants at strategic milestones throughout the schedule. The meetings follow our Consider, Confirm,
Commit"' project approach. We plan these strategic touch points to allow efficient use of time to review stakeholders' and staff input. They also allow us to provide essential progress updates on key issues related to design,
approvals, and project expectations.
Commit
Commit
Confirm
Consider
Consider
SD estimate and budget alignment
phasing, alternates, and value engineering
sequencing approach with CMAR
indoor play Issue RFP Draft for review
FF& Ebudget detail
link Confirm climbing wall RFP issue
PAGE 40 I BARKER RINKER SEACAT ARCHITECTURE
343
APPENDIX D - CONCEPTUAL DESIGN APPROACH
PEOPLE
Who are the people that live
in Lathrop and who do they
aspire to be?
DESIGN THREADS
PLACE
Where do people live, work and
play? Tell us about landmarks of
interest and places of pride.
We use a people -inspired design process to design
facilities that reflect each unique community. Design
Threads is one of our tools used to identify aesthetic, organizational and conceptual themes unique to a
project and a city. Design Threads are big ideas or
concepts represented by images and words. They are
discovered during our research and design process and
help us understand and describe the unique People,
Place, and Pace — or quality of life — unique to each
community. We use Design Threads as inspiration to
create organizational, aesthetic and experiential building and site designs unique to a community, City and region.
The design team works with the City throughout the
conceptual design process to establish several threads.
These threads build foundational concepts and integrate throughout the project' sdesign phases.
Shown right are 5 questions we ask to help residents
articulate what is unique about their community. The
intent is to better understand the people, the place, and their pace of life.
The residents of Berthoud told us
their view of Longs Peak was a
defining feature.
PACE
How do you want to
experience this place and
what is the pace of life?
5 QUESTIONS
How do you describe where you live
when you are away from home?
What places or events must visitors
experience when they are here?
Why do you live here?
How do you want to be perceived
as a community?
How do you not want to be
perceived as a community?
We pulled inspra1Ion from
William Henry Holmes' painting of
Longs Peak...
rrr
V
to create a one -of -a -kind mosaic
wall in their center.
er
344
APPENDIX D - CONCEPTUAL DESIGN APPROACH
SITE PROGRAM & LANDSCAPE DESIGN
The site program and landscape design present
an opportunity to integrate the Complex with
the city' s growing urban fabric, the surrounding
agrarian context and the San Joaquin riverfront.
The approach and access experience to the
Community Center Complex will be designed
to be welcoming and intuitive to all users.
The focus on clarity in circulation and user
experience will extend to the design of pedestrian
access and spaces. Users will be able to walk
between various community facilities through a
thoughtfully designed landscape that provides
clear wayfinding, seating and shade, and visual
and seasonal interest through an engaging palette
of native and low water -use pollinator plants and
trees. Outdoor sports fields, splash pads and the
amphitheater space shall seamlessly integrate
with the material and visual aesthetic of the
buildings, creating a cohesive and imageable
Lathrop Community Center Complex.
ik
PAGE 42 I BARKER RINKER SEACAT ARCHITECTURE
345
346
APPENDIX E - SUSTAINABLE DESIGN PHILOSOPHY
SUSTAINABLE DESIGN
At BRS, sustainability is at the core of everything we do. With building operations, materials, and construction responsible for nearly 40% of global CO2 emissions, our focus on sustainable and energy -efficient design is fundamental to our practice. Aligned with our firm' score Purpose, "to create places that improve community wellbeing," we integrate sustainability into every facet of our work, aiming to understand and respond to user needs while preserving the environment.
We incorporate energy -responsive measures in every project, balancing upfront costs with long- term operational efficiency. This includes considering building orientation, climate -specific design strategies, and integrating energy - efficient technologies and systems.
We have ingrained sustainable design practices in our philosophy throughout our firm' s history. We prioritize minimizing energy use, maintenance requirements, and environmental impact while maximizing user comfort. With 30+ sustainable certifications, including Cal Green, LEED, and Green Globe, our past projects showcase our commitment to designing high -performing buildings that promote conservation, wellness, and quality of life.
CASE STUDY:
PENMET PARKS COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER
GIG HARBOR, WASHINGTON I Currently under construction; estimated opening spring 2026.
BUILDING ORIENTED SOUTH/
SOUTHEAST TO MAXIMIZE HEAT GAIN SOLAR PANELS LOW ALBEDO ROOF SKYLIGHTS ORIENTED NORTH
MINIMIZED PAVING &
MAXIMIZED PLANTING AREAS
EV CHARGING STATIONS MATERIALS WITH REDUCED
EMBODIED CARBON PRIORITIZED
PAGE 44 I BARKER RINKER SEACAT ARCHITECTURE
347
APPENDIX E - CERTIFIED SUSTAINABLE PROJECTS
Eagle View Adult Center
LEED Gold
Center of Recreational Excellence
LEED Silver
BASE Big Sky Community Center
LEED Gold
We conscientiously design
buildings that are high -
performing and promote
conservation, wellness, and
quality of life.
CERTIFIED SUSTAINABLE
1 LEED Platinum
16 LEED Gold
9 LEED Silver
2 LEED Certified
2 Green Globes Certified
3 CALGreen
UCCS Student Wellness Center
LEED Gold
Et
Durango Public Library
LEED Gold
Yellowstone Canyon Lodging
LEED Gold
C
Carla Madison Recreation Center
LEED Gold
CORE Recreation Center
CALGreen ( pending)
BARKER RINKER SEACAT ARCHITECTURE I PAGE 45
348
Public Works Department 390 Towne Centre Dr. — Lathrop, CA 95330 Phone ( 209) 941- 7430
www. ci. lathrop. ca. us
ADDENDUM NO. 1— February 12, 2025
Request for Proposals
For
Multi -Purpose Community Center Complex
This addendum amends the Request for Proposals ( RFP) for this project as follows:
After careful consideration, the City has decided to modify the scope of work outlined in this Request for Proposals. Given the size of the project and the uncertainties involved, the decision has been made to phase the project. Addendum # 1 is being issued to expedite the process and minimize additional work for consultants, with a more detailed revision to the RFP forthcoming in Addendum
2. The revised Request for Proposal ( RFP) will now concentrate exclusively on the activities leading up to the selection of the Concept, with additional work scope incorporated within the phases. Any inquiries, questions or concerns regarding the new upcoming updated scope can be submitted for clarification in the upcoming revision of the RFP. We value your time and appreciate your expertise, and the questions received thus far and appreciate your assistance as we navigate through this significant project.
End of Addendum # 1
Proposer Acknowledgment of Addendum # 1:
Barker Rinker Seacat Architecture February 19, 2025
Company Name
Craig Bouck, Principal -in -Charge
Date
Consultant Name & Title Consultant' sSignature
PAGE 46 I BARKER RINKER SEACAT ARCHITECTURE
349
City of
Public Works Department 390 Towne Centre Dr. — Lathrop, CA 95330 Phone (209) 941- 7430
www. ci. lathrop. ca. us
ADDENDUM NO. 2 — February 18, 2025
Request for Proposals
For
Multi -Purpose Community Center Complex
This addendum amends the Request for Proposals ( RFP) for this project as follows:
Enclosed is the revised Request for Proposal (RFP). This RFP will now concentrate exclusively on the activities leading up to the selection of the Concept, with additional work scope incorporated within the phases. Any inquiries, questions or concerns regarding the new upcoming updated scope can be submitted for clarification in the upcoming revision of the RFP. We value your time and appreciate your expertise, and the questions received thus far and appreciate your assistance as we navigate through this significant project.
Enclosed:
Addendum # 2 Revised Proposal
End of Addendum # 2
Proposer Acknowledgment of Addendum # 2:
Barker Rinker Seacat Architecture February 19, 2025
Company Name
Craig Bouck, Principal -in -Charge
Date
Consultant Name & Title Consultant' sSignature
Signed Addendum must be submitted along with the proposal BARKER RINKER SEACAT ARCHITECTURE I PAGE 47
350
PS 24- 04 - Addendum No. 3
List of current RFP recipients:
1. Group 4 Architecture, Research + Planning, Inc.
2. DAHLIN ARCHITECTURE I PLANNING IINTERIORS
3. WESTWOOD
4. RIOS
5. NJA Architecture
6. ELS Architecture+ Urban Design
7. FDI Consulting
8. LPA Design Studios
9. Kuth Ranieri Architects
10. SVA Architects
11. BARKER RINKER SEACAT ARCHITECTURE
12. GRIFFIN STRUCTURES
13. NOLL & TAM ARCHITECTS
14. HMC ARCHITECTS
Enclosed:
1) Site plan used for environmental clearance
2) Stanford Crossing Road Plan
End of Addendum # 3
Proposer Acknowledgment of Addendum # 3:
Barker Rinker Seacat Architecture February 19, 2025
Company Name
Craig Bouck, Principal -in -Charge
Date
Consultant Name & Title Consultant' sSignature
Signed Addendum must be submitted along with the proposal PAGE 48 I BARKER RINKER SEACAT ARCHITECTURE
351
352
The expertise and experience
of the BRS staff was invaluable
in providing a national
perspective on current trends
in the design of community
recreation centers."
ROGER L. THOMAS
PROVO CITY DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION
FOLLOW US FOR MORE FUN ON INSTAGRAM @BRSARCHITECTURE
990 South Broadway, Suite 222, Denver, CO 80209
303. 455. 1366 brsarch. com
353
PAGE LEFT
INTENTIONALLY
BLANK
354
ITEM 4. 12
CITY MANAGER' S REPORT
MAY 12, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
ITEM: AUTHORIZE ADJUSTMENT TO THE REPUBLIC
SERVICES SOLID WASTE COLLECTION RATES FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2025-026
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution to Authorize an Increase to Republic Services Collection Rates Based on the
Twelve -Month Average Change in the Consumer
Price Index for All Urban Consumers ( Water, Sewer,
and Trash Collection Service Index) for Fiscal Year
2025-026
SUMMARY:
The City of Lathrop is responsible for the collection and the transport of solid waste within City limits. Since 2003, the City has contracted for these services with Lathrop Sunrise Sanitation, now doing business as Republic Services. The Agreement between the City of Lathrop and Republic Services allows for an annual rate adjustment based on the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers ( Water, Sewer, and Trash).
On April 7, 2025, Republic Services submitted their annual CPI adjustment for commercial and residential rates. For the period of January 1, 2024 through January 1, 2025, the CPI increased by 4. 89%. The annual CPI increase of 4. 89% would apply to all customer classes.
As part of the established consumer rates, Republic Services collects a franchise fee from all customers to cover the cost of state mandated solid waste outreach.
Franchise fees are remitted to the City and staff uses those funds to maintain compliance with state regulations.
If approved, this item will adjust annual rates by 4. 89% for the upcoming fiscal year beginning July 1, 2025, in accordance with the contract terms.
BACKGROUND:
The Lathrop Municipal Code Section 8. 16. 090 gives the City the exclusive right and duty to collect and transport solid waste or provide for the collection and transportation thereof within the City limits under such terms and conditions, as it deems necessary for the public health, safety and well- being, and it may contract for the provision of those services.
On May 13, 2024, City Council approved a five- year amended and restated contract for residential and commercial customers with the contract term ending June 30, 2029.
355
CITY MANAGER' S REPORT
MAY 12, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
REPUBLIC SERVICES ADJUSTMENT FOR FY 2025-026
PAGE 2
Section V of the Agreement provides that collection rates shall be reviewed annually and adjustments to the maximum solid waste collection rates is to be based on the 12 -month average change of the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers Water, Sewer, and Trash Collection Service Index), not to exceed 5%.
On April 7, 2025, staff received a request from Republic Services to adjust their commercial and residential rates. The proposed 4. 89% increase is based on the 12 - month average change of the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers ( Water, Sewer, and Trash Collection Service Index), which does not exceed the maximum threshold established in the contract of 5%.
The increase would apply to all customer classes effective on July 1, 2025.
The rate request is as follows:
STANDARD RESIDENTIAL RATES:
Container Size Current Rate Proposed 4. 89% Difference
Rate Increase
Small - 30 . al 40. 01
43. 10
48. 93
41. 97 1. 96
Medium - 60 ' al 45. 21 2. 11
Larne - 90 al 51. 32 2. 39
SENIOR RESIDENTIAL RATES:
Container Size Current Rate Proposed 4% Difference
Rate Increase
Small - 30 ' al 29. 78
31. 98
36. 09
31. 24
33. 54
37. 85
1. 46
Medium - 60 . al 1. 56
Larne - 90 . al 1. 76
MOBILE HOME/ TRAILER PARK RATES:
Container Size Current Rate Proposed 4.89% Difference
Rate Increase
Small - 30 ' al 33. 45 35. 09 1. 64
Medium - 60 ' al 34. 11 35. 78 1. 67
Lar. e-90' al 39. 25 41. 17 1. 92
SENIOR MOBILE HOME/ TRAILER PARK RATES:
Container Size Current Rate Proposed 4. 89% Difference
Rate Increase
Small — 30 ' al 25. 10 26. 33 1. 23
Medium — 60 a al 25. 55 26. 80 1. 25
Larne — 90 gal 29.4 30. 67 1. 43
356
CITY MANAGER' SREPORT
MAY 12, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
REPUBLIC SERVICES ADJUSTMENT FOR FY 2025-026
VETERAN RATES:
PAGE 3
Container Size Current Rate Proposed 4. 89% Difference
Rate Increase
Small - 30 • al 36. 01 37. 77 1.76
Medium - 60 • al 38. 79
44. 04
40. 69 1. 90
Lar• e - 90 • al 46. 19 2. 15
LOW INCOME RATES:
Container Size Current Rate Proposed 4. 89% Difference
Rate Increase
Small - 30 • al 32. 01 33. 58 1. 57
Medium - 60 • al N/ A
N/ A
N/ A
N/ A
N/ A
Lar• e - 90 • al N/ A
COMMERCIAL TRASH RATES - CURRENT RATES:
Container
Size
1 Cu. Yd
One/ Wk
117.7
Two/ Wk
178. 56
Three/ Wk
239. 90
Four/ Wk
301. 19
Five/ Wk
362. 56
2 Cu. Yd 150. 64 231. 40 317. 82 392. 95 473. 71
3 Cu. Yd 190. 98 305. 18 440. 27 600. 95 761.7
4 Cu. Yd 238. 36 392. 95 606. 82 820.0 1030. 85
5 Cu. Yd 295. 04 566. 84 838. 64 1110. 43 1348. 82
6 Cu. Yd 349. 81 682. 56 1015. 73 1348. 82 1681. 99
Lg. Cart 49. 92 N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A
COMMERCIAL RECYCLING RATES - CURRENT RATES:
Container
Size
1 Cu. Yd
One/ Wk
93. 74
Two/ Wk
178. 56
Three/ Wk
239. 90
Four/ Wk
301. 19
Five/ Wk
362. 56
2 Cu. Yd 120. 51 231. 40 317. 82 392. 95 473. 71
3 Cu. Yd 152. 78 305. 18 440. 27 600. 95 761.7
4 Cu. Yd 190. 69 392. 95 606. 82 820.0 1030. 85
5 Cu. Yd 236. 03 566. 84 838. 64 1110. 43 1348. 82
6 Cu. Yd 279. 85 682. 56 1015. 73 1348. 82 1681. 99
Lg. Cart 49. 92 N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A
COMMERCIAL ORGANIC WASTE RATES - CURRENT RATES:
90 Gallon 49. 92
357
CITY MANAGER' S REPORT
MAY 12, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
REPUBLIC SERVICES ADJUSTMENT FOR FY 2025-026
COMMERCIAL TRASH RATES - PROPOSED RATES:
PAGE 4
Container
Size
1 Cu. Yd
One/ Wk
122. 90
Two/ Wk
187. 29
Three/ Wk
251. 63
Four/ Wk
315. 92
Five/ Wk
380. 29
2 Cu. Yd 158. 01 242. 72 333.6 412. 17 496. 87
3 Cu. Yd 200. 32 320. 10 461. 80 630. 94 799. 02
4 Cu. Yd 250. 02 412. 17 636. 49 860. 94 1081. 26
5 Cu. Yd 309. 47 594.6 879. 65 1164. 73 1414. 78
6 Cu. Yd 366. 92 715. 94 1065. 40 1414. 78 1764. 2
Lg. Cart 52. 36 N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A
COMMERCIAL RECYCLING RATES - PROPOSED RATES:
Container
Size
1 Cu. Yd
One/ Wk
98. 32
Two/ Wk
149. 84
Three/ Wk
201. 30
Four/ Wk
252. 73
Five/ Wk
304. 23
2 Cu. Yd 126. 40 194.7 266. 69 329. 73 397. 50
3 Cu. Yd 160. 25 256. 08 369. 44 504. 27 639. 22
4 Cu. Yd 200. 01 329. 73 509. 20 688. 75 865. 01
5 Cu. Yd 247. 57 475. 73 70372 931. 78 1131. 83
6 Cu. Yd 293. 53 572. 75 852. 32 1131. 83 1411. 39
Lg. Cart 52. 36 N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A
COMMERCIAL ORGANIC WASTE RATES - PROPOSED RATES:
90 Gallon 52. 36
Weights in excess of maximum amounts per bin per pick up will be charged an additional $ 8. 00 per extra 100 pounds.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No fiscal impact to the City at this time. However, pursuant to the Agreement between the City of Lathrop and Lathrop Sunrise Sanitation, now doing business as Republic Services, and Lathrop Municipal Code Section 8. 16.80, Republic Services shall remit to the City of Lathrop a Franchise Fee of seven ( 7%) percent and an AB939 Recycling Fee of three ( 3%) percent of the gross revenue collected within ten ( 10) days following the completion of each calendar month.
ATTACHMENT:
A. Resolution to Authorize an Increase to Republic Services Collection Rates Based on the Twelve - Month Average Change in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers ( Water, Sewer, and Trash Collection Service Index) for Fiscal Year 2025-026
B. Letter from Republic Services dated April 7, 2025
358
CITY MANAGER' S REPORT
MAY 12, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
REPUBLIC SERVICES ADJUSTMENT FOR FY 2025-026
APPROVALS:
PAGE 5
4. 2. 95
Todd S: bastiaPr Date
Director of Parks and Recreation
Cari Jame
Director of -Finance
gladaogs
Date
L// 1, 1016 —
Thomas Hedegard Date
Deputy City Manager
V y•2-4•Z. oZs
Michael King A
Date
Assistant City Manager
Salvador Navarrete Date
City Attorney
S •S • 25
Stephen J. Salvatore Date
City Manager
359
RESOLUTION NO. 25 -
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LATHROP TO
AUTHORIZE AN INCREASE TO REPUBLIC SERVICES COLLECTION RATES
BASED ON THE TWELVE- MONTH AVERAGE CHANGE IN THE CONSUMER
PRICE INDEX FOR ALL URBAN CONSUMERS ( WATER, SEWER, AND TRASH) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-026
WHEREAS, on May 13, 2024, City Council approved a five- year amended and restated contract for residential and commercial customers with the contract term ending June 30, 2029; and
WHEREAS, Section V of the Agreement provides that collection rates shall be reviewed annually and adjustments to the maximum solid waste collection rates is to be based on the 12 -month average change of the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers ( Water, Sewer, and Trash Collection Service Index), not to exceed 5%; and
WHEREAS, on April 7, 2025, staff received a request from Republic Services to adjust their commercial and residential rates pursuant to the Agreement, summarized above; and
WHEREAS, the current 4. 89% increase is on the 12 -month average change of the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers ( Water, Sewer, and Trash Collection Service Index), does not exceed the maximum threshold established in the contract of 5%; and
WHEREAS, the increase would apply to all customer classes effective on July 1, 2025; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Agreement between the City of Lathrop and Republic Services and Lathrop Municipal Code Section 8. 16.80 Republic Services shall remit to the City of Lathrop a Franchise Fee of seven ( 7%) percent and a AB939 Recycling Fee of three ( 3%) percent of the gross revenue collected within ten ( 10) days following the completion of each calendar month.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lathrop hereby authorizes an Increase to Republic Services Collection Rates Based on the Twelve - Month Average Change in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers ( Water, Sewer, and Trash Collection Service Index) for Fiscal Year 2025- 2026, pursuant to Section V of the Agreement, and pursuant to Lathrop Municipal Code Section 8. 16.70, but that the City' sfranchised solid waste hauler shall not be permitted to charge fees any higher than specified for each customer type listed:
360
STANDARD RESIDENTIAL RATES:
Container Size Current Rate Proposed 4. 89% Difference
Rate Increase
Small - 30 • al 40. 01 41. 97 1. 96
Medium - 60 • al 43. 10 45. 21 2. 11
Lars - 90 • al 48. 93 51. 32 2. 39
SENIOR RESIDENTIAL RATES:
Container Size Current Rate Proposed 4% Difference
Rate Increase
Small - 30 • al 29. 78 31. 24 1. 46
Medium - 60 • al 31. 98 33. 54 1. 56
Lars - 90 • al 36. 09 37. 85 1. 76
MOBILE HOME/ TRAILER PARK RATES:
Container Size Current Rate Proposed 4. 89% Difference
Rate Increase
Small - 30 • al 33. 45 35. 09 1. 64
Medium - 60 • al 34. 11 35. 78 1. 67
Lar• e - 90 • al 39. 25 41. 17 1. 92
SENIOR MOBILE HOME/ TRAILER PARK RATES:
Container Size Current Rate Proposed 4. 89% Difference
Rate Increase
Small - 30 • al 25. 10 26. 33 1. 23
Medium - 60 • al 25. 55 26. 80
30. 67
1. 25
Lars - 90 • al 29.4 1. 43
VETERAN RATES:
Container Size Current Rate Proposed 4. 89% Difference
Rate Increase
Small - 30 • al 36. 01 37. 77 1. 76
Medium - 60 • al 38. 79 40. 69 1. 90
Lars - 90 • al 44. 04 46. 19 2. 15
LOW INCOME RATES:
Container Size Current Rate Proposed 4. 89%
Rate Increase
Difference
Small - 30 • al 32. 01 33. 58 1. 57
Medium - 60 • al N/ A N/ A N/ A
Lars - 90 • al N/ A N/ A N/ A
361
MMERCIAL TRASH RATES - PROPOSED RATES:
Container
Size
1 Cu. Yd
One/ Wk
122. 90
Two/ Wk
187. 29
Three/ Wk
251. 63
Four/ Wk
315. 92
Five/ Wk
380. 29
2 Cu. Yd 158. 01 242. 72 333.6 412. 17 496. 87
3 Cu. Yd 200. 32 320. 10 461. 80 630. 94 799. 02
4 Cu. Yd 250. 02 412. 17 636. 49 860. 94 1081. 26
5 Cu. Yd 309. 47 594.6 879. 65 1164. 73 1414. 78
6 Cu. Yd 366. 92 715. 94 1065. 40 1414. 78 1764. 2
Lg. Cart 52. 36 N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A
COMMERCIAL RECYCLING RATES - PROPOSED RATES:
Container
Size
1 Cu. Yd
One/ Wk
98. 32
Two/ Wk
149. 84
Three/ Wk
201. 30
Four/ Wk
252. 73
Five/ Wk
304. 23
2 Cu. Yd 126. 40 194.7 266. 69 329. 73 397. 50
3 Cu. Yd 160. 25 256. 08 369. 44 504. 27 639. 22
4 Cu. Yd 200. 01 329. 73 509. 20 688. 75 865. 01
5 Cu. Yd 247. 57 475. 73 70372 931. 78 1131. 83
6 Cu. Yd 293. 53 572. 75 852. 32 1131. 83 1411. 39
Lg. Cart 52. 36 N/ A N/ A N/ A N/ A
COMMERCIAL ORGANIC WASTE RATES - PROPOSED RATES:
90 Gallon 52. 36
Weights in excess of maximum amounts per bin per pick up will be charged an additional $ 8. 00 per extra 100 pounds.
362
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of May 2025, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Paul Akinjo, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Teresa Vargas, City Clerk Salvador Navarrete, City Attorney 363
40 REPVBLIa
SERVICES
Sustainability in Action
Melissa Stathakopoulos
City of Lathrop
390 Towne Centre Dr.
Lathrop, CA 95330
Subject: Annual CPI -Based Rate Adjustment - Effective July 1, 2025 Dear Ms. Stathakopoulos,
ATTACHMENT' w
April 7, 2025
Pursuant to Section V, Item F of the Agreement Between the City of Lathrop and Lathrop Sunrise Sanitation Corporation, collection rates are subject to annual review during the month of May and may be adjusted effective July lst. Per the terms of the agreement, adjustments are based on the 12 -month average change in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers ( Water, Sewer, and Trash Collection Services Index), as published by the U. S.
Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
For the period of January 1, 2024, through January 1, 2025, the CPI increased by 4. 89%.
Accordingly, we have applied this adjustment to the current rates.
Please find attached the proposed new collection rates, which are scheduled to take effect on July 1, 2025.
We appreciate the City' scontinued partnership and confidence in Republic Services of Lathrop.
As always, we remain committed to delivering reliable and professional solid waste services to the Lathrop community.
Should you have any questions or require additional information, please feel free to contact me at (209) 547- 7531.
Sincerely,
Republic Services o athrop
Z -z> )
Cina Thompson
Municipal Manager
1145 W Charter Way, Stockton, CA 95206 l RepublicServices. com I Environmental Servkes, Recycling & Waste 364
RW REPUBLIC
S
fie NVY E=ti
Lathrop Sunrise Sanitation Trash Rates Effective 7/1/ 24 (Current) 1/ WK 2/ WK 3/ WK 4/ WK 5/ WK
1 YD
2 YD
3 YD
4 YD
5 YD
6 YD
150. 64
238. 36
349. 81
231. 40
392. 95
682. 56
317. 82
606. 82
1, 015. 73
392. 95
820.0
1, 348. 82
473. 71
1, 030. 85
1, 681. 99
LG Cart
Lathrop Sunrise Sanitation Recycling Rates Effective 7/ 1/ 24 (Current) 1/ WK
I
2/ WK 3/ WK 4/ WK
2 YD 120. 51
3 YD
4 YD 190. 69
279. 85
5 YD
6 VD
185.2
314.6
546. 05
254.6
485.6
812. 58
314.6
656.4
1, 079.6
378. 97
824. 68
1, 345. 59
90 Gallon Organic 49. 92
Residential Service Weekly Recycling and Green Waste Effective 7/1/ 24 (Current) Standard Senior MHP/ Trailer MHP Senior Veterans Low Income 30 gallon $' 16 U I $ 20. 73 533. 45 $ 25. 10 $ 36. 01 $ 32 i1 ' 60 gallon
90 gallon
43. 10 31. 98 34. 11 25. 55 38. 79 N/ A
4 .') i 6. 09 539. 25 29.4 5/ 9. 04
Lathrop Sunrise Sanitation Trash Rates Effective 7/ 1/ 2025 1 VI)
1/ WK 2/ WK 3/ WK 4/ WK 5/ WK
5" r' 7C: _ . '.•. 1 . 03 5315. 92
2 VD
3 YD
4 VI)
5 YD
YD
158. 01
250. 02
366. 92
242. 7
412. 17
715. 94
333.6
636. 49
1, 065. 40
412. 17
860. 94
1, 414. 78
496. 87
1, 081. 26
1, 764. 2
LG. CAR I
Lathrop Sunrise Sanitation Recycling Rates Effective 7/1/ 2025 1/ WK
1 YD
2/ WK 3/ WK 4/ WK 5/ WK
2iY 35 d3C4
2 VI)
3 VD
4 VD
S YD
6 V
90 Gallon Organic
126. 40
S" ILA
200. 01
293. 53
52. 36
194.7
329. 73
572. 75
266. 69
509. 20
852. 32
329. 73
688. 75
1,31. 83
397. 50
865. 01
1, 411. 39
Residential Service Weekly Trash Recycling and Green Waste Effective 7/1/ 2025 Standard
30 gallon
60 gallon
90 gallon
Senior MHP/ Trailer MHP Senior Veterans Low Income
337 7
45. 21 33. 54 $ 35. 78 2. 6. 80
30. 67
40. 69 N/ A
N=n
Weights in excess ofthese maximum amounts per bin per pick up will be charged an additional Y8. 00 per extra 100 pounds. 365
PAGE LEFT
INTENTIONALLY
BLANK
366
ITEM 4. 13
CITY MANAGER' S REPORT
MAY 12, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
ITEM: ACCEPT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED BY
BAGLEY ENTERPRISES, INC. FOR THE CORPORATION
YARD FUELING FACILITY, CIP GG 21- 13
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution to Accept Public Improvements Constructed by Bagley Enterprises, Inc. for the
Corporation Yard Fueling Facility, CIP GG 21- 13, and
Authorize the Filing of a Notice of Completion,
Release of Contract Retention and Release of
Performance and Payment Bonds
SUMMARY:
Bagley Enterprises, Inc. ( Bagley Enterprises) has completed construction of Corporation Yard Fueling Facility, Capital Improvement Project ( CIP) GG 21- 13 Project). Staff inspected the improvements, and they have been deemed complete and in accordance with the approved plans and specifications by the City Engineer.
Bagley Enterprises has submitted lien releases confirming all subcontractors and suppliers have been paid in full and provided a one- year warranty bond ( based on 10% of the construction contract) for the improvements to be accepted.
Staff request City Council accept the completed improvements constructed by Bagley Enterprises for the Project. Staff also request City Council authorize the filing of a Notice of Completion with the San Joaquin County Clerk -Recorder, the release of contract retention to Bagley Enterprises of $ 16, 761 within forty-ive (45) days after filing the Notice of Completion and the release of performance and payment bonds.
BACKGROUND:
On January 8, 2024, City Council awarded a construction contract to Bagley Enterprises for the Project in the amount of $ 335, 210, approved a 20% construction contingency of $67, 042, and authorized staff to spend up to this amount as necessary to achieve the goals of the Project.
The Project comprised the construction of a fueling facility. The scope of work included anchoring city -furnished gasoline, diesel and diesel exhaust fluid ( DEF) tanks in capacities of 5, 000, 3, 000 and 1, 000 gallons respectively. All additional components were supplied and installed by Bagley Enterprises, including fuel and DEF dispensers, pumps, hoses, nozzles and piping. Also included in the scope of work was a FuelMaster kiosk with software and connections to allow staff to track fuel usage.
367
CITY MANAGER' S REPORT PAGE 2
MAY 12, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
ACCEPT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED BY BAGLEY ENTERPRISES, INC. FOR THE CORPORATION YARD FUELING FACILITY, CIP GG 21- 13 No contract change orders were issued during the construction of the Project; therefore, the final contract price of the Project is $ 335, 210. Upon acceptance of the improvements, the performance bond ( Bond No. 66926354, $335, 210) and payment bond ( Bond No. 66926354, $ 335, 210) will be released and replaced with a one- year warranty bond ( Bond No. 66926354, $33, 521) upon City Council' sacceptance of the improvements. The one- year warranty bond covers any repairs or replacements that may become necessary during the one- year period beginning with this acceptance due to any defective materials or workmanship in connection with the completed improvements. Bagley Enterprises has also provided the necessary lien releases for the materials supplied and completed work.
Staff request City Council accept the improvements constructed by Bagley Enterprises for Corporation Yard Fueling Facility, CIP GG 21- 13. Staff also request City Council authorize the filing of a Notice of Completion with the San Joaquin County Clerk - Recorder, the release of contract retention to Bagley Enterprises of $ 16, 761 within forty-ive (45) days after the recording of the Notice of Completion and the release of performance and payment bonds.
REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION:
Bagley Enterprises has completed the Project pursuant to the contract documents dated January 8, 2024. Staff inspected the improvements, and they have been deemed complete and in accordance with the approved plans and specifications by the City Engineer.
Bagley Enterprises has submitted a one- year warranty bond for the improvements to be accepted ( based on 10% of the construction contract) and lien releases confirming all sub -contractors and suppliers have been paid in full. The warranty bond covers any repairs or replacements that become necessary during the one- year period, beginning with this acceptance, due to defective materials or workmanship in connection with the completed improvements.
The performance bond and payment bond will be released and replaced with the oneyear warranty bond upon City Council' sacceptance of the improvements.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The final construction contract amount with Bagley Enterprises for the Project is 335, 210. Adequate funds have been allocated in the adopted FY 2024-5 budget to Corporation Yard Fueling Facility, CIP GG 21- 13 to close out the Project. With the completion of the Project, staff request that unused funds be transferred back to the original funding source.
368
CITY MANAGER' S REPORT PAGE 3
MAY 12, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
ACCEPT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED BY BAGLEY ENTERPRISES, INC. FOR THE CORPORATION YARD FUELING FACILITY, CIP GG 21- 13 ATTACHMENTS:
A. Resolution to Accept Public Improvements Constructed by Bagley Enterprises, Inc. for Corporation Yard Fueling Facility, CIP GG 21- 13 and Authorize the Filing of a Notice of Completion, Release of Contract Retention and Release of Performance and Payment Bonds
B. Notice of Completion - Corporation Yard Fueling Facility, CIP GG 21- 13 369
CITY MANAGER' SREPORT PAGE 4
MAY 12, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
ACCEPT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED BY BAGLEY ENTERPRISES, INC. FOR CORPORATION YARD FUELING FACILITY, CIP GG 21- 13 APPROVALS:
4.2/ .Z5
Steven Hollenbeak Date
Assistant Engineer
Brac7Taylor
City Engineer
Cari Ja
Finance Ii ector
Date
Date
Michael King Date
Assistant City Manager
x•23 2azs
4frkt
Salvador Navarrete Date
City Attorney
Stephen J. Salvatore Date
City Manager
5.-15
370
RESOLUTION NO. 25-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LATHROP TO ACCEPT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED BY BAGLEY ENTERPRISES, INC. FOR THE CORPORATION YARD FUELING FACILITY, CIP GG 21- 13, AND
AUTHORIZE THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION, RELEASE OF
CONTRACT RETENTION AND RELEASE OF PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS
WHEREAS, on January 8, 2024, City Council awarded a construction contract to Bagley Enterprises, Inc. (Bagley Enterprises) for Corporation Yard Fueling Facility, CIP GG 21- 13 (Project) in the amount of $335, 210 and approved a 20% construction contingency of $67, 042, and authorized staff to spend up to this amount as necessary to achieve the goals of the Project; and
WHEREAS, the scope of work consisted of providing and installing components for a fueling facility; and
WHEREAS, staff inspected the improvements, and the City Engineer has deemed the improvements complete and in accordance with the approved plans and specifications; and
WHEREAS, no change orders were issued during construction; therefore, the final contract cost is $ 335, 210; and
WHEREAS, Bagley Enterprises has provided the necessary lien releases for the materials supplied and completed work and a one- year warranty bond ( based on 10% of total Project cost) for the improvements being accepted; and WHEREAS, the performance bond ( Bond No. 66926354, $335, 210) and payment bond ( Bond No. 66926354, $ 335, 210) will be released and replaced with a one- year warranty bond ( Bond No. 66926354, $ 33, 521) upon City Council' s acceptance of the improvements; and
WHEREAS, the one- year warranty bond covers any repairs or replacements that may become necessary during the one- year period beginning with this acceptance, due to defective materials or workmanship in connection with the completed improvements; and
WHEREAS, adequate funds have been allocated in the FY 2024-5 budget to Corporation Yard Fueling Facility, CIP GG 21- 13 to close out the Project. With the completion of the Project, staff request that unused funds be transferred back to the source Fund; and
WHEREAS, staff request City Council accept the public improvements constructed by Bagley Enterprises for Corporation Yard Fueling Facility, CIP GG 21- 13; and
371
WHEREAS, staff also request City Council authorize the filing of a Notice of Completion with the San Joaquin County Clerk -Recorder, the release of contract retention to Bagley Enterprises in the amount of $ 16, 761 within forty-ive (45) days after the recording of the Notice of Completion and the release of performance and payment bonds.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lathrop does hereby accept the completed public improvements constructed by Bagley Enterprises for Corporation Yard Fueling Facility, CIP GG 21- 13, pursuant to the contract documents dated January 8, 2024; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lathrop authorizes the filing of the Notice of Completion with the San Joaquin County Clerk - Recorder, the release of the contract retention to Bagley Enterprises in the amount of $ 16, 761 within forty-ive (45) days after the recording of the Notice of Completion, the release of the performance and payment bond; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lathrop approves the transfer of unused funds back to the original funding source. 372
The foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 12th day of May 2025 by the following vote of the City Council, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Paul Akinjo, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Teresa Vargas, City Clerk Salvador Navarrete, City Attorney 373
RECORDING REQUESTED BY, AND
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
CITY OF LATHROP
ATTN: CITY CLERK
390 TOWNE CENTRE DRIVE
LATHROP, CA 95330
Exemptfrom payment ofrecording fees ( GC 11922)
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER' S USE
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN:
1. That the interest or estate stated in paragraph 3 herein in the real property herein described is owned by:
NAME STREET AND NO. CITY STATE
City of Lathrop 390 Towne Centre Drive Lathrop CA 95330 If more than one owner of the interest stated, the name and address of each must be stated)
2. That the full name and address of the owner of said interest or estate, if there is only one owner, and that the full names and addresses of all the co -owners who own said interest or estate as tenants in common, as joint tenants, or otherwise, if there is more than one owner, are set forth in the preceding paragraph.
3. That the nature of the title of stated owner, or if more than one owner, then of the stated owner and co - owners is fee title (e.g. fee title, leasehold, joint tenancy, etc.).
4. That on the 12th day of May 2025 a work of improvement on the real property herein described was completed.
5. That the name of the original contractor, if any, for said work of improvement was: Bagley Enterprises, Inc.
6. That the name and address of the transferor is:
NAME STREET AND NO. CITY STATE
Bagley Enterprises, Inc. 2370 Maggio Circle Lodi, CA 95240
7. That the real property herein referred to is situated in the City of Lathrop County of San Joaquin, State of California, and is described as follows:
CIP GG 21- 13 Corporation Yard Fueling Facility
That the undersigned has knowledge of the contents herein and states under penalty ofperjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
CITY OF LATHROP
By:
Stephen J. Salvatore, City Manager Date
By:
Teresa Vargas, City Clerk Date
374
CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the NOTICE OF COMPLETION dated May 12, 2025 by Bagley Enterprises, Inc. to the City of Lathrop, a political corporation and/ or governmental agency, is hereby accepted by the undersigned officer or agent on behalfofthe City Council pursuant to authority conferred by minute action of the City Council adopted on May 12, 2025, and the grantee consents to recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer.
Dated By
Stephen J. Salvatore, City Manager
375
PAGE LEFT
INTENTIONALLY
BLANK
376
ITEM 4. 14
CITY MANAGER' SREPORT
MAY 12, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
ITEM: ACCEPT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED BY
D. L. FALK CONSTRUCTION, INC. FOR THE POLICE
PROPERTY AND EVIDENCE BUILDING, CIP GG 21- 13
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution to Accept Public Improvements Constructed by D. L. Falk Construction, Inc. for Police Property and Evidence Building, CIP GG 21- 13 and
Authorize the Filing of a Notice of Completion,
Release of Contract Retention and Release of
Performance and Payment Bonds
SUMMARY:
D. L. Falk Construction, Inc. (D. L. Falk Construction) has completed construction of the Police Property and Evidence Building, Capital Improvement Project ( CIP) GG 21- 13 ( Project). Staff inspected the improvements, and they have been deemed complete and in accordance with the approved plans and specifications by the City Engineer.
D. L. Falk Construction has submitted lien releases confirming all subcontractors and suppliers have been paid in full and provided a one- year warranty bond ( based on 10% of the construction contract) for the improvements to be accepted.
Staff request City Council accept the completed improvements constructed by D. L.
Falk Construction for the Project. Staff also request City Council authorize the filing of a Notice of Completion with the San Joaquin County Clerk -Recorder, the release of contract retention to D. L. Falk Construction of $319, 071 within forty-ive (45) days after filing the Notice of Completion and the release of performance and payment bonds.
BACKGROUND:
On June 12, 2023, City Council awarded a construction contract to D. L. Falk Construction for the Project in the amount of $ 5, 494, 000, authorized a 10% construction contingency of $ 549, 400, and authorized staff to spend up to this amount as necessary to achieve the goals of the Project.
The Project scope consisted of constructing a Property & Evidence Building for the Lathrop Police Department. The scope of work also included concrete and asphalt site paving, perimeter and internal fencing, and extensive modifications to increase building and site security.
On August 12, 2024, Council approved the payment of Contract Change Orders ( CCO) 4, 5 and 6 for $ 147, 72. On November 18, 2024, Council approved a budget 377
CITY MANAGER' SREPORT PAGE 2
MAY 12, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
ACCEPT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED BY D. L. FALK
CONSTRUCTION, INC. FOR THE POLICE PROPERTY AND EVIDENCE BUILDING, CIP GG 21- 13
amendment for the Project for $ 340, 00 to provide additional project funding for anticipated costs and approved the $ 222,62 cost of CCO 8. Eight ( 8) CCOs totaling 887, 405 were issued during construction. In summary, the total Project budget authorized by City Council was $ 6, 531, 612and the final contract price is $ 6, 381, 405.
Upon acceptance of the improvements, the performance bond ( Bond No. 57BCSIS2375, $ 5, 494, 000) and payment bond ( Bond No. 57BCSIS2375, 5, 494, 000) will be released and replaced with a one- year warranty bond ( Bond No. 57BCSIS2375- M, $638, 140) upon City Council' s
acceptance of the improvements.
The one- year warranty bond covers any repairs or replacements that may become necessary during the one- year period beginning with this acceptance due to any defective materials or workmanship in connection with the completed improvements.
D. L. Falk Construction has also provided the necessary lien releases for the materials supplied and completed work.
Staff request City Council accept the improvements constructed by D. L. Falk Construction for the Police Property and Evidence Building, CIP GG 21- 13. Staff also request City Council authorize the filing of a Notice of Completion with the San Joaquin County Clerk - Recorder, the release of contract retention to D. L. Falk Construction of $319, 071 within forty-ive (45) days after the recording of the Notice of Completion and the release of performance and payment bonds.
REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION:
D. L. Falk Construction has completed the Project pursuant to the contract documents dated June 12, 2023. Staff inspected the improvements, and they have been deemed complete and in accordance with the approved plans and specifications by the City Engineer.
D. L. Falk Construction has submitted a one- year warranty bond for the improvements to be accepted ( based on 10% of the construction contract) and lien releases confirming all sub -contractors and suppliers have been paid in full. The warranty bond covers any repairs or replacements that become necessary during the one- year period, beginning with this acceptance, due to defective materials or workmanship in connection with the completed improvements.
The performance bond and payment bond will be released and replaced with the oneyear warranty bond upon City Council' sacceptance of the improvements. 378
CITY MANAGER' S REPORT PAGE 3
MAY 12, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
ACCEPT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED BY D. L. FALK
CONSTRUCTION, INC. FOR THE POLICE PROPERTY AND EVIDENCE BUILDING, CIP GG 21- 13
FISCAL IMPACT:
The final construction contract amount with D. L. Falk Construction for the Project is 6, 381, 405. Adequate funds have been allocated in the FY 2024-5 budget to the Police Property and Evidence Building, CIP GG 21- 13 to close out the Project. With the completion of the Project, staff request that unused funds be transferred back to the original funding source.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Resolution to Accept Public Improvements Constructed by D. L. Falk Construction, Inc. for the Police Property and Evidence Building, CIP GG 21- 13 and Authorize the Filing of a Notice of Completion, Release of Contract Retention and Release of Performance and Payment Bonds
B. Notice of Completion - Police Property and Evidence Building, CIP GG 21- 13 379
CITY MANAGER' S REPORT PAGE 4
MAY 12, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
ACCEPT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED BY DL FALK
CONSTRUCTION, INC. FOR POLICE PROPERTY AND EVIDENCE BUILDING, CIP GG 21- 13
APPROVALS:
311&/ 4664 --
Steven Hollenbeak
Assistant Engineer
Brad aylor
City ngineer
Cari Jam
Finance • U ctor
1. z7, 2s
Date
Date
LiAthin. sS4102M5
Date
11 • 30 • 202. 3 -
Michael King Date
Assistant City Manager
Salvador Navarrete Date
City Attorney
3.7.25 Stephen J. Salvatore Date
City Manager
380
RESOLUTION NO. 25-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LATHROP TO ACCEPT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED BY DL FALK CONSTRUCTION, INC.
FOR POLICE PROPERTY AND EVIDENCE BUILDING, CIP GG 21- 13, AND
AUTHORIZE THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION, RELEASE OF
CONTRACT RETENTION AND RELEASE OF PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS
WHEREAS, on June 12, 2023, City Council awarded a construction contract to DL Falk Construction, Inc. (DL Falk Construction) for Police Property and Evidence Building, CIP GG 21- 13 (Project) in the amount of $ 5, 494, 000 with a 10% construction contingency of $ 549, 400, and authorized staff to spend up to this amount as necessary to achieve the goals of the Project; and WHEREAS, the scope of work consisted of constructing a Property and Evidence Building for Lathrop Police Department; and
WHEREAS, staff inspected the improvements, and the City Engineer has deemed the improvements complete and in accordance with the approved plans and specifications; and
WHEREAS, via resolution 24- 5608 on August 12, 2024, City Council approved the payment of Contract Change Orders ( CCO) 4, 5 and 6 for $ 147, 72; and WHEREAS, via resolution 24- 5674 on November 18, 2024, City Council approved a $ 340, 00 budget amendment for the Project and approved CCO 8 for 222,62; and
WHEREAS, during construction, eight ( 8) contract change orders totaling 887, 405 were issued, for a final contract cost of $6, 381, 405; and WHEREAS, DL Falk Construction has provided the necessary lien releases for the materials supplied and completed work and a one- year warranty bond ( based on 10% of total Project cost) for the improvements being accepted; and WHEREAS, the performance bond ( Bond No. 57BCSIS2375, $ 5, 494, 000) and payment bond ( Bond No. 57BCSIS2375, $ 5, 494, 000) will be released and replaced with a one- year warranty bond ( Bond No. 57BCSIS2375- M, $638, 140) upon City Council' sacceptance of the improvements; and
WHEREAS, the one- year warranty bond covers any repairs or replacements that may become necessary during the one- year period beginning with this acceptance, due to defective materials or workmanship in connection with the completed improvements; and
WHEREAS, adequate funds have been allocated in the FY 2024-5 budget to Police Property & Evidence Building, CIP GG 21- 13 to close out the Project. With the 381
completion of the Project, staff request that unused funds be transferred back to the source Fund; and
WHEREAS, staff request City Council accept the public improvements constructed by DL Falk Construction for Police Property and Evidence Building, CIP GG 21- 13; and
WHEREAS, staff also request City Council authorize the filing of a Notice of Completion with the San Joaquin County Clerk -Recorder, the release of contract retention to DL Falk Construction in the amount of $ 319, 071 within forty-ive (45) days after the recording of the Notice of Completion and the release of performance and payment bonds.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lathrop does hereby accept the completed public improvements constructed by DL Falk Construction for Police Property and Evidence Building, CIP GG 21- 13, pursuant to the contract documents dated June 12, 2023; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lathrop authorizes the filing of the Notice of Completion with the San Joaquin County Clerk - Recorder, the release of the contract retention to DL Falk Construction in the amount of $ 319, 071 within forty-ive (45) days after the recording of the Notice of Completion, the release of the performance and payment bond; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lathrop approves the transfer of unused funds back to the original funding source. 382
The foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 12th day of May 2025 by the following vote of the City Council, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Paul Akinjo, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Teresa Vargas, City Clerk Salvador Navarrete, City Attorney 383
ATTACHMENT
Q "
RECORDING REQUESTED BY, AND
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
CITY OF LATHROP
ATTN: CITY CLERK
390 TOWNE CENTRE DRIVE
LATHROP, CA 95330
Exempt from payment of recording fees ( GC 11922)
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER' SUSE
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN:
1. That the interest or estate stated in paragraph 3 herein in the real property herein described is owned by:
NAME STREET AND NO. CITY STATE
City of Lathrop 390 Towne Centre Drive Lathrop CA 95330 If more than one owner of the interest stated, the name and address of each must be stated)
2. That the full name and address of the owner of said interest or estate, if there is only one owner, and that the full names and addresses of all the co -owners who own said interest or estate as tenants in common, as joint tenants, or otherwise, ifthere is more than one owner, are set forth in the preceding paragraph.
3. That the nature of the title of stated owner, or if more than one owner, then of the stated owner and co - owners is fee title ( e.g. fee title, leasehold, joint tenancy, etc.).
4. That on the 12th day of May 2025 a work of improvement on the real property herein described was completed.
5. That the name of the original contractor, if any, for said work of improvement was: DL Falk Construction, Inc.
6. That the name and address of the transferor is:
NAME STREET AND NO. CITY STATE
DL Falk Construction, Inc. 3526 Investment Blvd. Hayward, CA 94545
7. That the real property herein referred to is situated in the City of Lathrop County of San Joaquin, State of California, and is described as follows:
CIP GG 21- 13 Police Property and Evidence Building
That the undersigned has knowledge of the contents herein and states under penalty ofperjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
CITY OF LATHROP
By:
Stephen J. Salvatore, City Manager Date
By:
Teresa Vargas, City Clerk Date
384
CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the NOTICE OF COMPLETION dated May 12, 2025 by DL Falk Construction, Inc. to the City ofLathrop, a political corporation and/ or governmental agency, is hereby accepted by the undersigned officer or agent on behalf of the City Council pursuant to authority conferred by minute action of the City Council adopted on May 12, 2025, and the grantee consents to recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer.
Dated By
Stephen J. Salvatore, City Manager
385
PAGE LEFT
INTENTIONALLY
BLANK
386
ITEM 4. 15
CITY MANAGER' S REPORT
MAY 12, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
ITEM: ACCEPT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED BY
AUTOMATIC DOOR SYSTEMS, INC. FOR LATHROP
POLICE DEPARTMENT ADA IMPROVEMENTS, CIP GG
23- 14
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution to Accept Public Improvements Constructed by Automatic Door Systems ( ADS) Inc.
for The Lathrop Police Department ADA
Improvements, CIP GG 23- 14, Authorize the Filing of
a Notice of Completion, Release of Contract
Retention and Release of Performance and Payment
Bonds
SUMMARY:
Automatic Door Systems, Inc. (ADS) has completed construction of The Lathrop Police Department Americans with Disabilities Act ( ADA) Improvements, Capital Improvement Project ( CIP) GG 23- 14 (Project).
Staff inspected the improvements, and they have been deemed complete and in accordance with the approved plans and specifications by the City Engineer. ADS has submitted lien releases, confirming all sub -contractors and suppliers have been paid in full, and a one- year warranty bond ( based on 10% of the construction contract) for the improvements to be accepted.
Staff request City Council accept the improvements constructed by ADS for the Project. Staff also request City Council authorize the filing of a Notice of Completion with the San Joaquin County Clerk, release of contract retention to ADS in the amount of $2, 028 within forty-ive (45) days after the recording of the Notice of Completion, and the release of performance and payment bonds.
BACKGROUND:
On September 9, 2024, the City Manager approved a construction contract with ADS for Lathrop Police Department ADA Improvements, CIP GG 23- 14 in the amount of 40, 550 and approved a 15% construction contingency of $ 6, 083 and authorized staff to spend up to this amount as necessary to achieve the goals of the Project.
Staff identified the Lathrop Police Department as a facility that would benefit from the installation of automatic doors to make access easier for people with disabilities.
Staff also identified the need to retrofit an existing swing door at the Community Center by installing an automatic door opener equipped with sensors and pushbuttons.
387
CITY MANAGER' S REPORT PAGE 2
MAY 12, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
ACCEPT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED BY AUTOMATIC DOOR SYSTEMS INC. FOR THE LATHROP POLICE DEPARTMENT ADA
IMPROVEMENTS, CIP GG 23- 14
ADS successfully completed the construction of the project. Upon acceptance of the improvements, the performance and payment bonds ( Bond No. NFB7471178, 40, 550) will be released and replaced with a warranty bond ( Bond No.
NFB74711478, $ 4, 055). The warranty bond covers any repairs or replacements that become necessary during the one- year period, beginning with this acceptance, due to defective materials or workmanship in connection with the completed improvements. ADS has also provided the necessary lien releases for the materials supplied and completed work.
Staff request City Council accept the public improvements constructed by ADS for Lathrop Police Department ADA Improvements, CIP GG 23- 14. Staff also request City Council authorize the filing of a Notice of Completion with the San Joaquin County Clerk, the release of contract retention to ADS in the amount of $2, 028 within fortyfive ( 45) days after the recording of the Notice of Completion, and the release of performance and payment bonds.
REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION:
The project was completed by ADS pursuant to the contract documents dated September 9, 2024. Staff inspected the improvements, and the City Engineer deemed the improvements complete and in accordance with the approved plans and specifications.
ADS has submitted a one- year warranty bond for the improvements to be accepted based on 10% of the construction contract) and lien releases confirming all subcontractors and suppliers have been paid in full. The warranty bond covers any repairs or replacements that become necessary during the one- year period, beginning with this acceptance, due to defective materials or workmanship in connection with the completed improvements.
The performance bond and payment bond will be released and replaced with the oneyear warranty bond upon City Council' s acceptance of the improvements.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The final construction contract with ADS for the project is for $ 40, 550. Adequate funds have been allocated in the adopted FY 2024-5 budget to CIP GG 23- 14 to close out the Project. Staff is requesting that any unused funds be returned to its original funding source Measure C fund ( 1060).
388
CITY MANAGER' S REPORT PAGE 3
MAY 12, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
ACCEPT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED BY AUTOMATIC DOOR SYSTEMS INC. FOR THE LATHROP POLICE DEPARTMENT ADA
IMPROVEMENTS, CIP GG 23- 14
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Resolution to Accept Public Improvements Constructed by Automatic Door Systems, Inc. for the Lathrop Police Department ADA Improvements, CIP GG 23- 14, Authorize the Filing of a Notice of Completion, Release of Contract Retention, and Release of Performance and Payment Bonds B. Notice of Completion - Lathrop Police Department ADA Improvements , CIP GG 23- 14
389
CITY MANAGER' S REPORT PAGE 4
MAY 12, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
ACCEPT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED BY AUTOMATIC DOOR SYSTEMS INC. FOR THE LATHROP POLICE DEPARTMENT ADA
IMPROVEMENTS, CIP GG 23- 14
APPROVALS:
AO /- 1.• J- s ---
Carlos Carrillo Date
Management Analyst
Brad aylor
City Engineer
Cari Jaj es
Financ= Director
Date
ii/? 6/ 7O7, s
54/ 023"
Date
S. • Z • Z oZS"
Michael King Date
Assistant City Manager
Salvador Navarrete Date
City Attorney
Stephen J. Salvatore Date
City Manager
390
RESOLUTION NO. 25-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LATHROP TO ACCEPT
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED BY AUTOMATIC DOOR SYSTEMS, INC. FOR THE LATHROP POLICE DEPARTMENT ADA IMPROVEMENTS, CIP GG 23- 14, AND AUTHORIZE THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION, RELEASE
OF CONTRACT RETENTION AND RELEASE OF PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS
WHEREAS, on September 9, 2024, the City Manager executed a construction contract with Automatic Door Systems, Inc. (ADS) for Lathrop Police Department ADA Improvements, CIP GG 23- 14 in the amount of $ 40, 550 and approved a 15% construction contingency of $ 6, 083 and authorized staff to spend up to this amount as necessary to achieve the goals of the Project; and
WHEREAS, the Project scope consisted of installing automatic doors at the Lathrop Police Station and the retrofit of an existing door at the Community Center by installing an automatic door opener equipped with sensors and pushbuttons; and WHEREAS, staff inspected the improvements, and they have been deemed complete and in accordance with the approved plans and specifications by the City Engineer; and
WHEREAS, the final construction contract amount with ADS for the project is 40, 550. Adequate funds have been allocated in the adopted FY 2024-5 budget to CIP GG 23- 14 to close out the Project; and
WHEREAS, staff is requesting that any unused funds be returned to its original funding source Measure C fund ( 1060); and
WHEREAS, ADS has submitted a one- year warranty bond for the improvements to be accepted ( based on 10% of the construction contract) and lien releases confirming all sub - contractors and suppliers have been paid in full; and WHEREAS, the performance and payment bonds ( Bond No. NFB7471178, 40, 550) will be released and replaced with a warranty bond ( Bond No.
NFB74711478, $ 4, 055); and
WHEREAS, the one- year warranty bond covers any repairs or replacements that may become necessary during the one- year period beginning with this acceptance, due to defective materials or workmanship in connection with the completed improvements; and
WHEREAS, staff request City Council accept the public improvements constructed by ADS for CIP GG 23- 14. Staff also request City Council authorize the filing of a Notice of Completion with the San Joaquin County Clerk, the release of contract retention to ADS in the amount of $ 2, 028 within forty-ive (45) days after the recording of the Notice of Completion, and the release of performance and payment bonds; and
391
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lathrop does hereby accept the completed public improvements constructed by Automatic Door Systems Inc. for The Lathrop Police Department ADA Improvements, CIP GG 23- 14, pursuant to the contract documents dated September 9, 2024; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lathrop authorizes the filing of the Notice of Completion with the San Joaquin County Clerk - Recorder, the release of the contract retention to ADS in the amount of $2, 028 within forty-ive (45) days after the recording of the Notice of Completion, the release of the performance and payment bond; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lathrop authorizes any unused funds to be returned to its original funding source, Measure C Fund ( 1060)
392
The foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 12th day of May 2025 by the following vote of the City Council, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Paul Akinjo, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Teresa Vargas, City Clerk Salvador Navarrete, City Attorney 393
ATTACHMENT
RECORDING REQUESTED BY, AND
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
CITY OF LATHROP
ATTN: CITY CLERK
390 TOWNE CENTRE DRIVE
LATHROP, CA 95330
Exemptfrom payment ofrecording fees ( GC 11922)
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER' SUSE
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN:
1. That the interest or estate stated in paragraph 3 herein in the real property herein described is owned by:
NAME STREET AND NO. CITY STATE
City of Lathrop 390 Towne Centre Drive Lathrop CA 95330 If more than one owner of the interest stated, the name and address of each must be stated)
2. That the full name and address of the owner of said interest or estate, ifthere is only one owner, and that the full names and addresses of all the co -owners who own said interest or estate as tenants in common, as joint tenants, or otherwise, if there is more than one owner, are set forth in the preceding paragraph.
3. That the nature of the title of stated owner, or if more than one owner, then of the stated owner and co -owners is fee title (e.g. fee title, leasehold, joint tenancy, etc.).
4. That on the 12th day of May 2025 a work of improvement on the real property herein described was completed.
5. That the name of the original contractor, if any, for said work of improvement was: Automatic Door Systems, Inc.
6. That the name and address of the transferor is:
NAME STREET AND NO. CITY STATE
Automatic Door Systems Inc. 982 Terminal Way San Carlos, CA 94070
7. That the real property herein referred to is situated in the City of Lathrop County of San Joaquin, State of California, and is described as follows:
CIP GG 23- 14 Lathrop Police Department ADA Improvements That the undersigned has knowledge ofthe contents herein and states under penalty ofperjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
CITY OF LATHROP
By:
Stephen J. Salvatore, City Manager Date
By:
Teresa Vargas, City Clerk Date
394
CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the NOTICE OF COMPLETION dated May 12, 2025 by Automatic Door Systems, Inc. to the City of Lathrop, a political corporation and/ or governmental agency, is hereby accepted by the undersigned officer or agent on behalf of the City Council pursuant to authority conferred by minute action of the City Council adopted on May 12, 2025, and the grantee consents to recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer.
Dated By
Stephen J. Salvatore, City Manager
395
PAGE LEFT
INTENTIONALLY
BLANK
396
ITEM 4. 16
CITY MANAGER' S REPORT
MAY 12, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
ITEM: ACCEPT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED BY
ALL STEEL FENCE, INC. FOR CITY FACILITIES
FENCING IMPROVEMENTS, CIP GG 24-5 AND
THOMSEN PARK IMPROVEMENTS, CIP PK 22- 09
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution to Accept Public Improvements Constructed by All Steel Fence, Inc. for City Facilities Fencing Improvements, CIP GG 24-5 and Thomsen
Park Improvements, CIP PK 22- 09, and Authorize
the Filing of a Notice of Completion, Release of
Contract Retention and Release of Performance and
Payment Bonds
SUMMARY:
All Steel Fence, Inc. (AII Steel Fence) has completed construction of City Facilities Fencing Improvements, Capital Improvement Project ( CIP) GG 24-5 and Thomsen Park Improvements, CIP PK 22- 09 (Project). Staff inspected the improvements, and they have been deemed complete and in accordance with the approved plans and specifications by the City Engineer.
AII Steel Fence has submitted lien releases confirming all subcontractors and suppliers have been paid in full and provided a one- year warranty bond ( based on 10% of the construction contract) for the improvements to be accepted.
Staff request City Council accept the completed improvements constructed by AII Steel Fence for the Project. Staff also request City Council authorize the filing of a Notice of Completion with the San Joaquin County Clerk - Recorder, the release of contract retention to AII Steel Fence of $ 8, 406 within forty-ive (45) days after filing the Notice of Completion and the release of performance and payment bonds.
BACKGROUND:
On August 14, 2023, City Council awarded a construction contract to AII Steel Fence for the Project in the amount of $ 164, 254, approved a 15% construction contingency of $24, 638, and authorized staff to spend up to this amount as necessary to achieve the goals of the Project.
The Project scope of CIP GG 24-5 consisted of replacing chain link fencing and gates with tubular steel fencing and gates at the Mossdale wastewater pump station, Harlan Road wastewater pump station and Easy Court stormwater pump station. The Project scope of CIP PK 22- 09 consisted of installing 2 tubular steel pedestrian gates, a short segment of fencing and a concrete slab to construct a sally port into the south side 397
CITY MANAGER' SREPORT PAGE 2
MAY 12, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
ACCEPT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED BY ALL STEEL FENCE, INC.
FOR CITY FACILITIES FENCING IMPROVEMENTS, CIP GG 24-5 AND THOMSEN PARK IMPROVEMENTS, CIP PK 22- 09
of Thomsen Park. The sally port will provide a controlled portal for guests with dogs entering or leaving the park.
One change order for $ 3, 865 was issued during construction; therefore, the final contract cost is $ 168,19. The performance bond ( Bond No. ES00015862, $164, 254) and payment bond ( Bond No. ES00015862, $164, 254) will be released and replaced with a one- year warranty bond ( Bond No. ES00015862, $16, 811) upon City Council' s acceptance of the improvements. The one- year warranty bond covers any repairs or replacements that may become necessary during the one- year period beginning with this acceptance due to any defective materials or workmanship in connection with the completed improvements. All Steel Fence has also provided the necessary lien releases for the materials supplied and completed work.
Staff request City Council accept the improvements constructed by All Steel Fence for City Facilities Fencing Improvements, CIP GG 24-5 and Thomsen Park Improvements, CIP PK 22- 09. Staff also request City Council authorize the filing of a Notice of Completion with the San Joaquin County Clerk -Recorder, the release of contract retention to All Steel Fence of $ 8, 406 within forty-ive (45) days after the recording of the Notice of Completion and the release of performance and payment bonds.
REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION:
All Steel Fence has completed the Project pursuant to the contract documents dated August 14, 2023. Staff has inspected the improvements, and they have been deemed complete and in accordance with the approved plans and specifications by the City Engineer.
All Steel Fence has submitted a one- year warranty bond for the improvements to be accepted ( based on 10°/ 0 of the construction contract) and lien releases confirming all sub -contractors and suppliers have been paid in full. The warranty bond covers any repairs or replacements that become necessary during the one- year period, beginning with this acceptance, due to defective materials or workmanship in connection with the completed improvements.
The performance bond and payment bond will be released and replaced with the oneyear warranty bond upon City Council' s acceptance of the improvements.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The final construction contract amount with All Steel Fence for the Project is 168,19. Adequate funds have been allocated in the adopted FY 2024-5 budget to CIP GG 24-5 and CIP PK 22- 09 to close out the Project. With the completion of the Project, staff request that unused funds be transferred back to the original funding sources.
398
CITY MANAGER' SREPORT PAGE 3
MAY 12, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
ACCEPT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED BY ALL STEEL FENCE, INC.
FOR CITY FACILITIES FENCING IMPROVEMENTS, CIP GG 24-5 AND THOMSEN PARK IMPROVEMENTS, CIP PK 22- 09
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Resolution to Accept Public Improvements Constructed by All Steel Fence, Inc. for City Facilities Fencing Improvements, CIP GG 24-5 and Thomsen Park Improvements, CIP PK 22- 09 and Authorize the Filing of a Notice of Completion, Release of Contract Retention and Release of Performance and Payment Bonds
B. Notice of Completion - City Facilities Fencing Improvements, CIP GG 24-5 and Thomsen Park Improvements, CIP PK 22- 09
399
CITY MANAGER' SREPORT PAGE 4
MAY 12, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
ACCEPT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED BY ALL STEEL FENCE, INC.
FOR CITY FACILITIES FENCING IMPROVEMENTS, CIP GG 24-5 AND THOMSEN PARK IMPROVEMENTS, CIP PK 22- 09
APPROVALS:
5-1, eve, 11 t.24 .26
Steven Hollenbeak Date
Assistant Engineer
Brad aylor
City ngineer
Cari James
Finance Dir& tor
L
Olbots
Date
442S1001S
Date
Li• 2.3• Zo25-
Michael King Date
Assistant City Manager
4 Salvador Navarrete Date
City Attorney
Z., 5": 25
Stephen J. Salvatore Date
City Manager
400
RESOLUTION NO. 25-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LATHROP TO ACCEPT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED BY ALL STEEL FENCE, INC. FOR CITY FACILITIES FENCING IMPROVEMENTS, CIP GG 24-5 AND THOMSEN PARK IMPROVEMENTS, CIP PK 22- 09, AND AUTHORIZE THE FILING OF A NOTICE
OF COMPLETION, RELEASE OF CONTRACT RETENTION AND RELEASE OF
PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS
WHEREAS, on August 14, 2023, City Council awarded a construction contract to All Steel Fence, Inc. ( AII Steel Fence) for 2023 City Facilities Fencing Improvements, CIP GG 24-5 and Thomsen Park Improvements, CIP PK 22- 09 Project) in the amount of $ 164, 254 and approved a 15% construction contingency of $ 24, 638, and authorized staff to spend up to this amount as necessary to achieve the goals of the Project; and
WHEREAS, the scope of work consisted of replacing chain link fencing with tubular steel fencing at three ( 3) utility pump stations and installing tubular steel fencing and gates at Thomsen Park; and
WHEREAS, staff inspected the improvements, and the City Engineer has deemed the improvements complete and in accordance with the approved plans and specifications; and
WHEREAS, one change order for $ 3, 865 was issued during construction; therefore, the final contract cost is $ 168,19; and
WHEREAS, AII Steel Fence has provided the necessary lien releases for the materials supplied and completed work and a one- year warranty bond ( based on 10% of total Project cost) for the improvements being accepted; and WHEREAS, the performance bond ( Bond No. ES00015862, $ 164, 254) and payment bond ( Bond No. ES00015862, $164, 254) will be released and replaced with a one- year warranty bond ( Bond No. ES00015862, $16, 811) upon City Council' s acceptance of the improvements; and
WHEREAS, the one- year warranty bond covers any repairs or replacements that may become necessary during the one- year period beginning with this acceptance, due to defective materials or workmanship in connection with the completed improvements; and
WHEREAS, adequate funds have been allocated in the FY 2024-5 budget to CIP GG 24-5 and CIP PK 22- 09 to close out the Project. With the completion of the Project, staff request that unused funds be transferred back to the source Funds; and WHEREAS, staff request City Council accept the public improvements constructed by AII Steel Fence for City Facilities Fencing Improvements, CIP GG 24- 25 and Thomsen Park Improvements, CIP PK 22- 09; and
401
WHEREAS, staff also request City Council authorize the filing of a Notice of Completion with the San Joaquin County Clerk -Recorder, the release of contract retention to All Steel Fence in the amount of $ 8, 406 within forty-ive (45) days after the recording of the Notice of Completion and the release of performance and payment bonds.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lathrop does hereby accept the completed public improvements constructed by All Steel Fence for City Facilities Fencing Improvements, CIP GG 24-5 and Thomsen Park Improvements, CIP PK 22- 09, pursuant to the contract documents dated August 14, 2023; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lathrop authorizes the filing of the Notice of Completion with the San Joaquin County Clerk - Recorder, the release of the contract retention to All Steel Fence in the amount of 8, 406 within forty-ive (45) days after the recording of the Notice of Completion, the release of the performance and payment bond; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lathrop approves the transfer of unused funds back to the original funding sources. 402
The foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 12th day of May 2025 by the following vote of the City Council, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Paul Akinjo, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Teresa Vargas, City Clerk Salvador Navarrete, City Attorney 403
RECORDING REQUESTED BY, AND
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
CITY OF LATHROP
ATTN: CITY CLERK
390 TOWNE CENTRE DRIVE
LATHROP, CA 95330
Exempt from payment ofrecording fees ( GC 11922)
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER' S USE
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN:
1. That the interest or estate stated in paragraph 3 herein in the real property herein described is owned by:
NAME STREET AND NO. CITY STATE
City of Lathrop 390 Towne Centre Drive Lathrop CA 95330 If more than one owner of the interest stated, the name and address of each must be stated)
2. That the full name and address of the owner of said interest or estate, ifthere is only one owner, and that the full names and addresses of all the co - owners who own said interest or estate as tenants in common, as joint tenants, or otherwise, if there is more than one owner, are set forth in the preceding paragraph.
3. That the nature of the title of stated owner, or if more than one owner, then of the stated owner and co - owners is fee title ( e.g. fee title, leasehold, joint tenancy, etc.).
4. That on the 12th day of May 2025 a work of improvement on the real property herein described was completed.
5. That the name of the original contractor, if any, for said work of improvement was: A11 Steel Fence, Inc.
6. That the name and address of the transferor is:
NAME STREET AND NO. CITY STATE
All Steel Fence, Inc. 146 Klo Road Lathrop, CA 95330
7. That the real property herein referred to is situated in the City of Lathrop County of San Joaquin, State of California, and is described as follows:
City Facility Fencing Improvements, CIP GG 24-5 and Thomsen Park Improvements, CIP PK 22- 09 That the undersigned has knowledge of the contents herein and states under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
CITY OF LATHROP
By:
Stephen J. Salvatore, City Manager Date
By:
Teresa Vargas, City Clerk Date
404
CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the NOTICE OF COMPLETION dated May 12, 2025 by All Steel Fence, Inc. to the City of Lathrop, a political corporation and/ or governmental agency, is hereby accepted by the undersigned officer or agent on behalf of the City Council pursuant to authority conferred by minute action of the City Council adopted on May 12, 2025, and the grantee consents to recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer.
Dated By
Stephen J. Salvatore, City Manager
405
PAGE LEFT
INTENTIONALLY
BLANK
406
ITEM 4. 17
CITY MANAGER' S REPORT
MAY 12, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
ITEM: ACCEPT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED BY
JOHN D. WAIT MASONRY, INC., FOR MOSSDALE
LANDING MONUMENT SIGN, CIP GG 25- 06
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution to Accept Public Improvements Constructed by John D. Wait Masonry Inc., for
Mossdale Landing Monument Sign, CIP GG 25- 06,
Authorize the Filing of a Notice of Completion,
Release of Contract Retention, and Release of
Performance and Payment Bonds
SUMMARY:
John D. Wait Masonry Inc. (Wait Masonry) has completed construction of Mossdale Landing Monument Sign, Capital Improvement Project ( CIP) GG 25- 06 (Project).
Staff inspected the improvements, and they have been deemed complete and in accordance with the approved plans and specifications by the City Engineer.
Wait Masonry has submitted lien releases, confirming all sub -contractors and suppliers have been paid in full, and a one- year warranty bond ( based on 10% of the construction contract) for the improvements to be accepted.
Staff request City Council accept the improvements constructed by Wait Masonry for the Project. Staff also request City Council authorize the filing of a Notice of Completion with the San Joaquin County Clerk, release of contract retention to John Wait in the amount of $ 1, 815 within forty-ive (45) days after the recording of the Notice of Completion, and the release of performance and payment bonds.
BACKGROUND:
On September 9, 2024, City Council approved a construction contract to Wait Masonry for Mossdale Landing Monument Sign, CIP GG 25- 06 in the amount of 36,00 and approved a 10°/ 0 construction contingency of $ 3, 630, and authorized staff to spend up to this amount as necessary to achieve the goals of the project. The Project scope consisted of the design, construction, and installation of a monument sign for the Mossdale Landing area on the southwest corner of River Islands Parkway and Golden Valley Parkway. The construction of the Monument Sign will serve as a prominent landmark, enhancing the identity and visibility of the Mossdale Landing area.
One contract change order in the amount of $ 3, 000 was issued during the construction of the project; therefore, the final cost of the project is $ 39,00, which is within the approved budget of $ 39, 930.
407
CITY MANAGER' S REPORT PAGE 2
MAY 12, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
ACCEPT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED BY JOHN D. WAIT
MASONRY INC. FOR MOSSDALE LANDING MONUMNET SIGN , CIP GG 25- 06 Wait Masonry successfully completed the construction of the project. Upon acceptance of the improvements, the performance and payment bonds ( Bond No.
GRCA67360, $ 36,00) will be released and replaced with a warranty bond ( Bond No. GRCA67360, $3, 630). The warranty bond covers any repairs or replacements that become necessary during the one- year period, beginning with this acceptance, due to defective materials or workmanship in connection with the completed improvements. Wait Masonry has also provided the necessary lien releases for the materials supplied and completed work.
Staff request City Council accept the public improvements constructed by Wait Masonry for Mossdale Landing Monument Sign, CIP GG 25- 06. Staff also request City Council authorize the filing of a Notice of Completion with the San Joaquin County Clerk, the release of contract retention to Wait Masonry in the amount of $ 1, 815 within forty-ive (45) days after the recording of the Notice of Completion, and the release of performance and payment bonds.
REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION:
The project was completed by Wait Masonry pursuant to the contract documents dated September 9, 2025. Staff inspected the improvements, and the City Engineer deemed the improvements complete and in accordance with the approved plans and specifications.
Wait Masonry has submitted a one- year warranty bond for the improvements to be accepted ( based on 10% of the construction contract) and lien releases confirming all sub -contractors and suppliers have been paid in full. The warranty bond covers any repairs or replacements that become necessary during the one- year period, beginning with this acceptance, due to defective materials or workmanship in connection with the completed improvements.
The performance bond and payment bond will be released and replaced with the oneyear warranty bond upon City Council' sacceptance of the improvements.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The final construction contract amount with Wait Masonry for the project is $ 39,00, including a $ 3, 000 change order due to additional work to fix the existing retaining wall to be able to tie in the monument sign.
Adequate funds have been allocated in the adopted FY 2024-5 budget for Mossdale Landing Monument Sign, CIP GG 25- 06 to close out the Project. With the completion of the project, staff request that unused funds be returned to the source fund, Landscape Reserves.
408
CITY MANAGER' SREPORT PAGE 3
MAY 12, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
ACCEPT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED BY JOHN D. WAIT
MASONRY INC. FOR MOSSDALE LANDING MONUMNET SIGN , CIP GG 25- 06 ATTACHMENTS:
A. Resolution to Accept Public Improvements Constructed by John D. Wait Masonry for Mossdale Landing Monument Sign, CIP GG 25- 06, Authorize the Filing of a Notice of Completion, Release of Contract Retention and Release of Performance and Payment Bonds
B. Notice of Completion - Mossdale Landing Monument Sign, CIP GG 25- 06 409
CITY MANAGER' S REPORT PAGE 4
MAY 12, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
ACCEPT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED BY JOHN D. WAIT
MASONRY INC. FOR MOSSDALE LANDING MONUMNET SIGN , CIP GG 25- 06 APPROVALS:
Carlos Carrillo Date
Management Analyst
Brad ij aylor
City Engineer
Cari J
Financ Dir- ctor
Date
j '/z, z J''
s/ i) s
4%As
Date
Z• ZozS
Michael King Date
Assistant City Manager
Salvador Navarrete Date
City Attorney
lo` LvZS
Stephen J. Salvatore Date
City Manager
410
RESOLUTION NO. 25-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LATHROP TO ACCEPT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED BY JOHN D. WAIT MASONRY, INC.
FOR MOSSDALE LANDING MONUMENT SIGN, CIP GG 25- 06, AND AUTHORIZE
THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION, RELEASE OF CONTRACT
RETENTION AND RELEASE OF PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS
WHEREAS, on September 9, 2024, City Council approved a construction contract with Wait Masonry for CIP GG 25- 06 in the amount of $36,00 and approved a 10% construction contingency of $ 3, 630, and authorized staff to spend up to this amount as necessary to achieve the goals of the project; and WHEREAS, project scope consisted of the design, construction, and installation of a monument sign for the Mossdale Landing area on the Southwest corner of River Islands Parkway and Golden Valley Parkway; and WHEREAS, staff inspected the improvements, and the City Engineer has deemed the improvements complete and in accordance with the approved plans and specifications; and
WHEREAS, one contract change order in the amount of $ 3, 000 was issued during the construction of the project; therefore, the final contract price of the project is $ 39,00, which is within the approved budget of $ 39, 930; and WHEREAS, Wait Masonry has provided the necessary lien releases for the materials supplied and completed work and a one- year warranty bond ( based on 10% of total Project cost) for the improvements being accepted; and WHEREAS, upon acceptance of the improvements, the performance and payment bonds ( Bond No. GRCA67360) will be released and replaced with a warranty bond ( Bond No. GRCA67360, $ 3, 630); and
WHEREAS, the one- year warranty bond covers any repairs or replacements that may become necessary during the one- year period beginning with this acceptance, due to defective materials or workmanship in connection with the completed improvements; and
WHEREAS, adequate funds have been allocated in the adopted FY 2024-5 budget to CIP GG 25- 06 to close out the Project. With the completion of the project, staff request that unused funds be returned to the source fund, Landscape Reserves; and WHEREAS, staff request City Council accept the public improvements constructed by Wait Masonry for Mossdale Landing Monument Sign , CIP GG 25- 06; and
WHEREAS, staff also request City Council authorize the filing of a Notice of Completion with the San Joaquin County Clerk - Recorder, the release of contract retention to Wait Masonry in the amount of $ 1, 815 within forty-ive (45) days after 411
the recording of the Notice of Completion and the release of performance and payment bonds.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lathrop does hereby accept the completed public improvements constructed by Wait Masonry for Mossdale Landing Monument Sign, CIP GG 25- 06, pursuant to the contract documents dated September 9, 2024; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lathrop authorizes the filing of the Notice of Completion with the San Joaquin County Clerk - Recorder, the release of the contract retention to Wait Masonry in the amount of 1, 815 within forty-ive (45) days after the recording of the Notice of Completion, the release of the performance and payment bond.
412
The foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 12th day of May 2025 by the following vote of the City Council, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Paul Akinjo, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Teresa Vargas, City Clerk Salvador Navarrete, City Attorney 413
RECORDING REQUESTED BY, AND
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
CITY OF LATHROP
ATTN: CITY CLERK
390 TOWNE CENTRE DRIVE
LATHROP, CA 95330
Exempt from payment ofrecording fees ( GC 11922)
ATTACHMENT
w pw
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER' SUSE
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN:
1. That the interest or estate stated in paragraph 3 herein in the real property herein described is owned by:
NAME STREET AND NO. CITY STATE
City of Lathrop 390 Towne Centre Drive Lathrop CA 95330 If more than one owner of the interest stated, the name and address of each must be stated)
2. That the full name and address of the owner of said interest or estate, ifthere is only one owner, and that the full names and addresses of all the co -owners who own said interest or estate as tenants in common, as joint tenants, or otherwise, ifthere is more than one owner, are set forth in the preceding paragraph.
3. That the nature of the title of stated owner, or if more than one owner, then of the stated owner and co -owners is fee title ( e.g. fee title, leasehold, joint tenancy, etc.).
4. That on the 12th day of May 2025 a work of improvement on the real property herein described was completed.
5. That the name of the original contractor, if any, for said work of improvement was: John D. Wait Masonry, Inc.
6. That the name and address of the transferor is:
NAME STREET AND NO. CITY STATE
John D. Wait Masonry Inc. 310 N. Cluff Ave Lodi, CA 95240
7. That the real property herein referred to is situated in the City of Lathrop County of San Joaquin, State of California, and is described as follows:
CIP GG 25- 06 Mossdale Landing Monument Sign
That the undersigned has knowledge of the contents herein and states under penalty ofperjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
CITY OF LATHROP
By:
By:
Stephen J. Salvatore, City Manager Date
Teresa Vargas, City Clerk Date
414
CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the NOTICE OF COMPLETION dated May 12, 2025 by John D. Wait Masonry Inc. to the City of Lathrop, a political corporation and/ or governmental agency, is hereby accepted by the undersigned officer or agent on behalf of the City Council pursuant to authority conferred by minute action of the City Council adopted on May 12, 2025, and the grantee consents to recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer.
Dated By
Stephen J. Salvatore, City Manager
415
PAGE LEFT
INTENTIONALLY
BLANK
416
ITEM 4. 18
CITY MANAGER' S REPORT
MAY 12, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
ITEM: ACCEPT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED BY
STOCKBRIDGE GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC. FOR
SHILLING AVENUE BASIN PARK, CIP PK 22- 34 AND
APPROVE BUDGET AMENDMENT
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution to Accept Public Improvements Constructed by Stockbridge General Contracting, Inc.
for the Shilling Avenue Basin Park, CIP PK 22- 34,
Approve Budget Amendment, and Authorize the Filing
of a Notice of Completion, Release of Contract
Retention, and Release of Performance and Payment
Bonds
SUMMARY:
On June 12, 2023, City Council awarded a construction contract to Stockbridge General Contracting, Inc. ( Stockbridge) for construction of Capital Improvement Project ( CIP) PK 22- 34 Shilling Avenue Park ( Project). Construction consisted of demolishing and off -hauling existing landscape, grading, installing children' s play structure, water play equipment, picnic tables and park benches. Street frontage improvements included constructing new curb, gutter, sidewalk, pavement grinding and overlaying new asphalt with new signing and striping.
Stockbridge has completed construction of the Project. Staff inspected and the City Engineer deemed the improvements complete and in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. Stockbridge has submitted lien releases, confirming all subcontractors and suppliers have been paid in full, and a one- year warranty bond ( based on 10% of the construction contract) for the improvements to be accepted.
Staff request City Council accept the improvements constructed by Stockbridge for the Project. Staff also request City Council authorize the filing of a Notice of Completion with the San Joaquin County Clerk, release of contract retention to Stockbridge, in the amount of $112, 310 within forty-ive (45) days after the recording of the Notice of Completion, and the release of performance and payment bonds.
The final construction contract cost is $ 2, 456, 134. The total Project budget was 2, 396, 425; therefore, staff request City Council approve a budget amendment transferring $ 59, 709 from the Measure C Fund ( 1060) to the CIP Project Fund ( 3010) to pay for the remaining construction costs and close out the Project, contingent upon approval of the Measure C Committee.
417
CITY MANAGER' S REPORT PAGE 2
MAY 12, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
ACCEPT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED BY STOCKBRIDGE GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC. FOR SHILLING AVENUE BASIN PARK, CIP PK 22- 34 AND
APPROVE BUDGET AMENDMENT
BACKGROUND:
On June 12, 2023, City Council awarded a construction contract to Stockbridge to remove and dispose existing landscape, install children' s play structure, water play equipment, picnic tables, park benches, construct new curb, gutter, sidewalk, pavement overlay, and install new signing and striping.
During construction, contract change orders totaling $ 197, 962 were issued for concrete, irrigation, and trenching improvements not included within the original scope of work. To minimize impacts to the stormwater detention basin, the Project required additional on -site storm drainage improvements, relocated utilities, permitting, engineering and geotechnical services for a total additional miscellaneous cost of $ 235, 194. Therefore, the Project' sfinal construction cost is $ 2, 456, 134.
The construction costs referenced below capture all expenditures.
A. Construction Contract Amount
B. Approved Change Order 1
C. Approved Change Order 2
D. Change Order 3 ( Pending Approval)
E. Miscellaneous
Total Construction Cost
2, 022, 978
57,26
106, 688
33, 748
235, 194
2, 456, 134
Upon acceptance of the improvements, the performance bond ( Bond No. 9406110, 2, 022, 978) and payment bond ( Bond No. 9406110, $2, 022, 978) will be released and replaced with a warranty bond ( Bond No. 9406110, $245, 613). The warranty bond covers any repairs or replacements that become necessary during the one- year period, beginning with this acceptance, due to defective materials or workmanship in connection with the completed improvements.
REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION:
Stockbridge has completed the Project pursuant to the contract documents dated June 12, 2023. Staff inspected the improvements and they were deemed complete and in accordance with the approved plans and specifications by the City Engineer.
Stockbridge has submitted a one- year warranty bond for the improvements to be accepted ( based on 10% of the construction contract) and lien releases confirming all sub - contractors and suppliers have been paid in full. The warranty bond covers any repairs or replacements that become necessary during the one- year period, beginning with this acceptance, due to defective materials or workmanship in connection with the completed improvements.
418
CITY MANAGER' SREPORT PAGE 3
MAY 12, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
ACCEPT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED BY STOCKBRIDGE GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC. FOR SHILLING AVENUE BASIN PARK, CIP PK 22- 34 AND
APPROVE BUDGET AMENDMENT
The performance bond and payment bond will be released and replaced with the oneyear warranty bond upon City Council' sacceptance of the improvements.
FISCAL IMPACT:
CIP PK 22- 34 had a balance of $ 70, 000 before the construction phase. With Stockbridge' scontract for $ 2, 022, 978 and a 15% construction contingency of 303, 447, the total Project budget was $ 2, 396, 425. During construction, contract change orders totaling $ 197, 962 were issued, and miscellaneous expenses totaling 235, 194 were paid resulting in a total construction cost of $ 2, 456, 134.
To pay for the remaining construction costs and close out the Project, staff request Council approve a budget amendment transferring $ 59, 709 from the Measure C Fund ( 1060) to the CIP Project Fund ( 3010) as follows:
Increase Transfer Out
1060- 9900-90- 9010
Increase Transfer In
3010- 9900- 393- 0000
Increase Expenditures
3010- 8000- 420- 12- 00
ATTACHMENTS:
PK 22- 34
PK 22- 34
59, 709
59, 709
59, 709
A. Resolution to Accept Public Improvements Constructed by Stockbridge General Contracting, Inc. for Shilling Avenue Basin Park, CIP PK 22- 34, Approve Budget Amendment, and Authorize the Filing of a Notice of Completion, Release of Contract Retention, and Release of Performance and Payment Bonds B. Notice of Completion - Shilling Avenue Basin Park, CIP PK 22- 34 419
CITY MANAGER' S REPORT PAGE 4
MAY 12, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
ACCEPT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED BY STOCKBRIDGE GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC. FOR SHILLING AVENUE BASIN PARK, CIP PK 22- 34 AND
APPROVE BUDGET AMENDMENT
APPROVALS:
Assistant Engineer
BraJT' aylor
City E1 gineer
Cari James
Director of a nance
Michael King
Assistant y Manager
Salvador Navarrete
City Attorney
04, 1/ 4 /Jotf
Date
y/ 21/o2C
Date
boa5
Date
13 2025'
Date
4IgrU
Date
5.8•z•-
Stephe Salvatore Date
City Manager
420
RESOLUTION NO. 25 -
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LATHROP
ACCEPT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED BY STOCKBRIDGE GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC. FOR SHILLING AVENUE BASIN PARK, CIP PK 22- 34,
APPROVE BUDGET AMENDMENT, AND AUTHORIZE THE FILING OF A NOTICE
OF COMPLETION, RELEASE OF CONTRACT RETENTION, AND RELEASE OF
PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS
WHEREAS, on June 12, 2023, City Council awarded a construction contract to Stockbridge General Contracting, Inc. ( Stockbridge) for construction of Capital Improvement Project ( CIP) PK 22- 34 Shilling Avenue Park ( Project); and WHEREAS, construction consisted of demolishing and off -hauling existing landscape, grading, installing children' splay structure, water play equipment, picnic tables and park benches. Street frontage improvements included constructing new curb, gutter, sidewalk, pavement grinding and overlaying new asphalt with new signing and striping; and
WHEREAS, Stockbridge has completed construction of the Project. Staff inspected and the City Engineer deemed the improvements complete and in accordance with the approved plans and specifications; and WHEREAS, Stockbridge has submitted lien releases, confirming all subcontractors and suppliers have been paid in full, and a one- year warranty bond based on 10% of the construction contract) for the improvements to be accepted; and
WHEREAS, staff request City Council accept the improvements constructed by Stockbridge for CIP PK 22- 34; and
WHEREAS, staff also request City Council authorize the filing of a Notice of Completion with the San Joaquin County Clerk, release of contract retention to Stockbridge in the amount of $ 112, 310, within forty-ive (45) days after the recording of the Notice of Completion, and the release of performance and payment bonds; and
WHEREAS, CIP PK 22- 34 had a balance of $ 70, 000 before the construction phase. With Stockbridge' scontract for $ 2, 022, 978 and a 15% construction contingency of $ 303, 447, the total Project budget was $ 2, 396, 425; and WHEREAS, during construction, contract change orders totaling $ 197, 962 were issued, and miscellaneous expenses totaling $ 235, 194 were paid resulting in a total construction cost of $ 2, 456, 134; and
WHEREAS, to pay for the remaining construction costs and close out the Project, staff request Council approve a budget amendment transferring $ 59, 709 from the Measure C Fund ( 1060) to the CIP Project Fund ( 3010) as follows:
421
Increase Transfer Out
1060- 9900-90- 9010
Increase Transfer In
3010- 9900- 393- 0000
Increase Expenditures
3010- 8000- 420- 12- 00
PK 22- 34
PK 22- 34
59, 709
59, 709
59, 709
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lathrop does hereby accept the public improvements constructed by Stockbridge for construction of the Shilling Avenue Basin Park, CIP PK 22- 34; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lathrop authorizes the filing of the Notice of Completion with the San Joaquin County Clerk and the release of the contract retention to Stockbridge in the amount of $ 112, 310, within forty-ive (45) days after the recording of the Notice of Completion, and authorizes the release of the performance and payment bonds; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lathrop also approves a budget amendment transferring $ 59, 709 from the Measure C Fund ( 1060) to the Project CIP Fund ( 3010) as detailed above.
422
The foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 12th day of May 2025, by the following vote of the City Council, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Paul Akinjo, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Teresa Vargas, City Clerk Salvador Navarrete, City Attorney 423
ATTACHMENT
RECORDING REQUESTED BY, AND
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
CITY OF LATHROP
ATTN: CITY CLERK
390 TOWNE CENTRE DRIVE
LATHROP, CA 95330
Exempt from payment of recording fees ( GC 11922)
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER' SUSE
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN:
1. That the interest or estate stated in paragraph 3 herein in the real property herein described is owned by:
NAME STREET AND NO. CITY STATE
City of Lathrop 390 Towne Centre Drive Lathrop CA 95330 If more than one owner of the interest stated, the name and address of each must be stated)
2. That the full name and address of the owner of said interest or estate, ifthere is only one owner, and that the full names and addresses of all the co - owners who own said interest or estate as tenants in common, as joint tenants, or otherwise, if there is more than one owner, are set forth in the preceding paragraph.
3. That the nature of the title of stated owner, or if more than one owner, then of the stated owner and co -owners is fee title (e.g. fee title, leasehold, joint tenancy, etc.).
4. That on the 12th day of May 2025 a work of improvement on the real property herein described was completed.
5. That the name of the original contractor, if any, for said work of improvement was: Stockbridge General Contracting, Inc.
6. That the name and address of the transferor is:
NAME STREET AND NO.
Stockbridge General 2972 Larkin Ave
Contracting, Inc.
CITY STATE
Clovis CA 93612
7. That the real property herein referred to is situated in the City of Lathrop County of San Joaquin, State of California, and is described as follows:
CIP PK 22- 34 Shilling Avenue Basin Park
That the undersigned has knowledge of the contents herein and states under penalty ofperjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
CITY OF LATHROP
By:
By:
Stephen J. Salvatore, City Manager Date
Teresa Vargas, City Clerk Date
424
CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the NOTICE OF COMPLETION dated May 12, 2025 by Stockbridge General Contracting, Inc. to the City of Lathrop, a political corporation and/ or governmental agency, is hereby accepted by the undersigned officer or agent on behalf of the City Council pursuant to authority conferred by minute action of the City Council adopted on May 12, 2025, and the grantee consents to recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer.
Dated By
Stephen J. Salvatore, City Manager
425
PAGE LEFT
INTENTIONALLY
BLANK
426
ITEM 4. 19
CITY MANAGER' S REPORT
MAY 12, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
ITEM: ACCEPT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED BY
CONSOLIDATED ENGINEERING, INC. FOR
CONSTRUCTION OF MCKINLEY AVENUE PAVEMENT
REHABILITATION, CIP PS 23- 18
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution to Accept Public Improvements Constructed by Consolidated Engineering, Inc. for
Construction of McKinley Avenue Pavement
Rehabilitation, CIP PS 23- 18, and Authorize the
Filing of a Notice of Completion, Release of Contract
Retention, and Release of Performance and Payment
Bonds
SUMMARY:
Consolidated Engineering, Inc. (Consolidated Engineering) completed construction of Capital Improvement Project ( CIP) PS 23- 18 for McKinley Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation ( Project) to repair the deteriorated pavement surface on McKinley Avenue from Louise Avenue to Yosemite Avenue. The scope of work included reconstructing the road' sstructural section, wearing course, and installation of new striping.
Consolidated Engineering completed construction of the Project. Staff inspected and the City Engineer deemed the improvements complete and in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. Consolidated Engineering has submitted lien releases, confirming all sub -contractors and suppliers have been paid in full, and a one- year warranty bond ( based on 10% of the construction contract) for the improvements to be accepted.
Staff request City Council accept the improvements constructed by Consolidated Engineering for the Project. Staff also request City Council authorize the filing of a Notice of Completion with the San Joaquin County Clerk, release of contract retention to Consolidated Engineering, in the amount of $ 60, 939, within forty-ive (45) days after the recording of the Notice of Completion, and the release of performance and payment bonds.
BACKGROUND:
On August 12, 2024, City Council awarded a construction contract to Consolidated Engineering for construction of CIP PS 23- 18 to rehabilitate McKinley Avenue from Louise Avenue to Yosemite Avenue. The Project construction consisted of removing the existing asphalt and replacing 6" of Hot -Mix -Asphalt over 7" of Class 2 Aggregate Base on prepared subgrade, and installing new signing and striping. 427
CITY MANAGER' SREPORT PAGE 2
MAY 12, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
ACCEPT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED BY CONSOLIDATED
ENGINEERING, INC. FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MCKINLEY AVENUE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, CIP PS 23- 18
Consolidated Engineering completed construction of the Project. Staff inspected the improvements and they have been deemed complete and in accordance with the plans and specifications approved by the City Engineer. The awarded contract was in the amount of $ 1, 093, 858 and a 15% construction contingency of $ 164, 080 was authorized for staff to use as necessary to achieve the goals of the project. The total construction budget for the project was $ 1, 257, 938.
During construction, contract change orders totaling $ 124, 919 were issued for a final contract amount of $ 1, 218, 777. The construction costs referenced below capture all expenditures.
Construction costs are as follows:
A. Construction Contract Amount
B. Approved Change Order 1
C. Approved Change Order 2
D. Approved Change Order 3
1, 093, 858
109, 932
3, 727
11, 260
Total Construction Costs $ 1, 218, 777
The Project has been completed in accordance with the plans, specifications, and City of Lathrop standards. Upon acceptance of the improvements, the performance and payment bonds ( Bond No. 7470477) will be released and replaced with a warranty bond ( Bond No. 7470477, $ 121, 878). The warranty bond covers any repairs or replacements that become necessary during the one- year period, beginning with this acceptance, due to defective materials or workmanship in connection with the completed improvements. Consolidated Engineering has also provided the necessary lien releases for the materials supplied and completed work.
Staff request City Council accept the public improvements constructed by Consolidated Engineering for the Project. Staff also request City Council authorize the filing of a Notice of Completion with the San Joaquin County Clerk, the release of contract retention to Consolidated Engineering in the amount of $ 60, 939 within fortyfive ( 45) days after the recording of the Notice of Completion, and the release of performance and payment bonds.
REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION:
The project was completed by Consolidated Engineering pursuant to the contract documents dated August 12, 2024. Staff inspected the improvements and the City Engineer deemed the improvements complete and in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. The performance and payment bonds ( Bond No. 7470477) will be released and replaced with a one- year warranty bond ( Bond No. 7470477, 121, 878) upon City Council' s
acceptance of the improvements.
428
CITY MANAGER' SREPORT PAGE 3
MAY 12, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
ACCEPT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED BY CONSOLIDATED
ENGINEERING, INC. FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MCKINLEY AVENUE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, CIP PS 23- 18
FISCAL IMPACT:
The awarded contract was in the amount of $ 1, 093, 858 with a 15% construction contingency of $ 164, 080 for a total construction budget of $ 1, 257, 938. During construction, contract change orders totaling $ 124, 919 were issued for a final construction cost of $ 1, 218, 777. Adequate funds were allocated within Fiscal Year 24/5 budget to close out CIP PS 23- 18. With the completion of this project, staff request that unused funds be transferred back into the Local Transportation Funds 2140).
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Resolution to Accept Public Improvements Constructed by Consolidated Engineering, Inc. for McKinley Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation, CIP PS 23- 18, and Authorize the Filing of a Notice of Completion, Release of Contract Retention, and Release of Performance and Payment Bonds B. Notice of Completion - McKinley Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation, CIP PS 23- 18 429
CITY MANAGER' S REPORT PAGE 4
MAY 12, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
ACCEPT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED BY CONSOLIDATED
ENGINEERING, INC. FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MCKINLEY AVENUE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, CIP PS 23- 18
APPROVALS:
Angel Abarca Date
Assistant Engineer
City BradJaylor ngineer
Cari Ja
Finance Jrector
7 Michael King
Assistant City Manager
Date
14/ 2AhAtri, s
O'!/ 2/ /YALE
Date
Date
Salvador Navarrete Date
City Attorney
LS.• • Z3 • ZoZS
Stephen J. Salvatore Date
City Manager
430
RESOLUTION NO. 25 -
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LATHROP TO ACCEPT
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED BY CONSOLIDATED ENGINEERING, INC. FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MCKINLEY AVENUE PAVEMENT
REHABILITATION, CIP PS 23- 18, AND AUTHORIZE THE FILING OF A NOTICE
OF COMPLETION, THE RELEASE OF CONTRACT RETENTION, AND THE
RELEASE OF PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS
WHEREAS, on August 12, 2024, City Council awarded a construction contract to Consolidated Engineering, Inc. ( Consolidated Engineering) for construction of Capital Improvement Project ( CIP) PS 23- 18 for McKinley Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation ( Project); and
WHEREAS, the Project construction consisted of removing the existing asphalt and replacing 6" of Hot -Mix -Asphalt over 7" of Class 2 Aggregate Base on prepared subgrade, and installing new signing and striping; and
WHEREAS, Consolidated Engineering completed construction of the Project.
Staff inspected and the City Engineer deemed the improvements complete and in accordance with the approved plans and specifications; and WHEREAS, Consolidated Engineering has submitted lien releases, confirming all sub -contractors and suppliers have been paid in full, and a one- year warranty bond ( based on 10% of the construction contract) for the improvements to be accepted; and
WHEREAS, staff request City Council accept the improvements constructed by Consolidated Engineering for the Project; and
WHEREAS, staff also request City Council authorize the filing of a Notice of Completion with the San Joaquin County Clerk, release of contract retention to Consolidated Engineering, in the amount of $60, 939, within forty-ive (45) days after the recording of the Notice of Completion, and the release of performance and payment bonds; and
WHEREAS, Knife River has submitted a one- year warranty bond ( based on 10% of total project cost) for the improvements being accepted; and WHEREAS, the performance and payment bonds ( Bond No. 7470477) will be released and replaced with a one- year warranty bond ( Bond No. 7470477, $121, 878) upon City Council' s
acceptance of the improvements; and
WHEREAS, the awarded contract was in the amount of $ 1, 093, 858 with a 15% construction contingency of $ 164, 080 for a total construction budget of 1, 257, 938. During construction, contract change orders totaling $ 124, 919 were issued for a final construction cost of $ 1, 218, 777; and 431
WHEREAS, adequate funds were allocated within Fiscal Year 24/5budget to close out CIP PS 23- 18. With the completion of this project, staff request that unused funds be transferred back into the Local Transportation Funds ( 2140).
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lathrop does hereby accept the public improvements constructed by Consolidated Engineering, Inc. for McKinley Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation, CIP PS 23- 18; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lathrop authorizes the filing of the Notice of Completion with the San Joaquin County Clerk and the release of the contract retention to Consolidated Engineering, Inc., in the amount of $ 60, 939, within forty-ive (45) days after the recording of the Notice of Completion, and authorizes the release of the performance and payment bonds; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that City Council also authorizes the transfer of the unused project funds into the Local Transportation Funds ( 2140) as detailed above.
432
The foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 12th day of May 2025, by the following vote of the City Council, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Paul Akinjo, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Teresa Vargas, City Clerk Salvador Navarrete, City Attorney 433
ATTACHMENT
RECORDING REQUESTED BY, AND
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
CITY OF LATHROP
ATTN: CITY CLERK
390 TOWNE CENTRE DRIVE
LATHROP, CA 95330
Exemptfrom payment ofrecording fees ( GC 11922)
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER' SUSE
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN:
1. That the interest or estate stated in paragraph 3 herein in the real property herein described is owned by:
NAME STREET AND NO. CITY STATE
City of Lathrop 390 Towne Centre Drive Lathrop CA 95330 If more than one owner of the interest stated, the name and address of each must be stated)
2. That the full name and address of the owner of said interest or estate, if there is only one owner, and that the full names and addresses of all the co -owners who own said interest or estate as tenants in common, as joint tenants, or otherwise, if there is more than one owner, are set forth in the preceding paragraph.
3. That the nature of the title of stated owner, or if more than one owner, then of the stated owner and co -owners is fee title (e.g. fee title, leasehold, joint tenancy, etc.).
4. That on the 12th day of May 2025 a work of improvement on the real property herein described was completed.
5. That the name ofthe original contractor, if any, for said work of improvement was: Consolidated Engineering, Inc.
6. That the name and address of the transferor is:
NAME STREET AND NO. CITY STATE
Consolidated Engineering, Inc. P. O. Box 701 Valley Springs CA 95252
7. That the real property herein referred to is situated in the State of California, and is described as follows:
CIP PS 23- 18 McKinley Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation
City of Lathrop County of San Joaquin,
That the undersigned has knowledge of the contents herein and states under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
CITY OF LATHROP
By:
By:
Stephen J. Salvatore, City Manager Date
Teresa Vargas, City Clerk Date
434
CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the NOTICE OF COMPLETION dated May 12, 2025 by Consolidated Engineering, Inc. to the City of Lathrop, a political corporation and/ or governmental agency, is hereby accepted by the undersigned officer or agent on behalf of the City Council pursuant to authority conferred by minute action of the City Council adopted on May 12, 2025, and the grantee consents to recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer.
Dated By
Stephen J. Salvatore, City Manager
435
PAGE LEFT
INTENTIONALLY
BLANK
436
ITEM 4. 20
CITY MANAGER' S REPORT
MAY 12, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
ITEM: ACCEPT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED BY
DSS COMPANY DBA KNIFE RIVER CONSTRUCTION
FOR JONQUIL DRIVE AND POPPY COURT PAVEMENT
REHABILITATION, CIP PS 25- 07
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution to Accept Public Improvements Constructed by DSS Company dba Knife River
Construction for Jonquil Drive and Poppy Court
Pavement Rehabilitation CIP PS 25- 07, and
Authorize the Filing of a Notice of Completion,
Release of Contract Retention, and Release of
Performance and Payment Bonds
SUMMARY:
DSS Company dba Knife River Construction ( Knife River) completed construction of the Capital Improvement Project ( CIP) PS 25- 07 Jonquil Drive and Poppy Court Pavement Rehabilitation ( Project). The scope of work consisted of a full reconstruction of the existing pavement along Jonquil Drive and Poppy Court.
Knife River completed construction of the Project. Staff inspected and the City Engineer deemed the improvements complete and in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. Knife River has submitted lien releases, confirming all subcontractors and suppliers have been paid in full, and a one- year warranty bond based on 10% of the construction contract) for the improvements to be accepted.
Staff request City Council accept the improvements constructed by Knife River for the Project. Staff also request City Council authorize the filing of a Notice of Completion with the San Joaquin County Clerk, release of contract retention to Knife River, in the amount of $36, 998 within forty-ive (45) days after the recording of the Notice of Completion, and the release of performance and payment bonds.
BACKGROUND:
On September 9, 2024, City Council created CIP PS 25- 07 and awarded a construction contract to Knife River for construction of the Project to rehabilitate Jonquil Drive and Poppy Court. The Project removed the existing deteriorated pavement and reconstructed 4" of hot mix asphalt over 9" of aggregate base along Jonquil Drive and Poppy Court.
Knife River completed construction of the Project. Staff inspected the improvements and they have been deemed complete and in accordance with the plans and specifications approved by the City Engineer. The awarded contract was in the amount of $ 643, 718and a 15% construction contingency of $96, 558 was authorized 437
CITY MANAGER' S REPORT PAGE 2
MAY 12, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
ACCEPT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED BY DSS COMPANY DBA
KNIFE RIVER CONSTRUCTION FOR JONQUIL DRIVE AND POPPY COURT PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, CIP PS 25- 07
for staff to use as necessary to achieve the goals of the project. The total construction budget for the project was $ 740, 276.
During construction, contract change orders totaling $ 96, 235 were issued for a final contract amount of $ 739, 953. The construction costs referenced below capture all expenditures.
Construction costs are as follows:
A. Construction Contract Amount
B. Approved Change Order 1
C. Approved Change Order 2
D. Approved Change Order 3
Total Construction Costs
643, 718
47, 316
24,33
24, 686
739, 953
The Project has been completed in accordance with the plans, specifications, and City of Lathrop standards. Knife River has also provided the necessary lien releases for the materials supplied and completed work.
Staff request City Council accept the public improvements constructed by Knife River for the Project. Staff also request City Council authorize the filing of a Notice of Completion with the San Joaquin County Clerk, the release of contract retention to Knife River in the amount of $ 36, 998 within forty-ive (45) days after the recording of the Notice of Completion, and the release of performance and payment bonds.
REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION:
The project was completed by Knife River pursuant to the contract documents dated September 9, 2024. Staff inspected the improvements and the City Engineer deemed the improvements complete and in accordance with the approved plans and specifications.
The performance and payment bonds ( Bond No. 190- 056- 260/ 108078550) will be released and replaced with a one- year warranty bond ( Bond No. 108078550, 73, 995) upon City Council' s
acceptance of the improvements. The warranty bond
covers any repairs or replacements that become necessary during the one- year period, beginning with this acceptance, due to defective materials or workmanship in connection with the completed improvements.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The awarded contract was in the amount of $ 643, 718 with a 15% construction contingency of $ 96, 558 for a total construction budget of $ 740, 276. During construction, contract change orders totaling $ 96, 235 were issued for a final 438
CITY MANAGER' S REPORT PAGE 3
MAY 12, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
ACCEPT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED BY DSS COMPANY DBA
KNIFE RIVER CONSTRUCTION FOR JONQUIL DRIVE AND POPPY COURT PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, CIP PS 25- 07
construction cost of $ 739, 953. Adequate funds were allocated within Fiscal Year 24/5 budget to close out CIP PS 25- 07. With the completion of this project, staff request that unused funds be transferred back into General Fund Street Repair Reserves ( 1010).
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Resolution to Accept Public Improvements Constructed by DSS Company dba Knife River Construction for Jonquil Drive and Poppy Court Pavement Rehabilitation CIP PS 25- 07, and Authorize the Filing of a Notice of Completion, Release of Contract Retention, and Release of Performance and Payment Bonds
B. Notice of Completion - Jonquil Drive and Poppy Court Pavement Rehabilitation, CIP PS 25- 07
439
CITY MANAGER' S REPORT PAGE 4
MAY 12, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
ACCEPT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED BY DSS COMPANY DBA
KNIFE RIVER CONSTRUCTION FOR JONQUIL DRIVE AND POPPY COURT PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, CIP PS 25- 07
APPROVALS:
Ds'- o' Sots
Ange1'* 5arca Date
Assistant Engineer
Braci/ Tylor
City Engineer
Cari Jame
Finance Di ctor
Michael King
Assistant City Manager
s// os
Date
Date
S• c Z. e LS
Date
SI
Salvador Navarrete Date
City Attorney
3 • 1.2-S"
Stephen J. Salvatore Date
City Manager
440
RESOLUTION NO. 25 -
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LATHROP TO ACCEPT
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED BY DSS COMPANY DBA KNIFE
RIVER CONSTRUCTION FOR JONQUIL DRIVE AND POPPY COURT PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, CIP PS 25- 07, AND AUTHORIZE THE FILING OF A NOTICE
OF COMPLETION, THE RELEASE OF CONTRACT RETENTION, AND THE
RELEASE OF PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS
WHEREAS, on September 9, 2024, City Council created Capital Improvement Project ( CIP) PS 25- 07 for Jonquil Drive and Poppy Court Pavement Rehabilitation Project); and
WHEREAS, the Project removed the existing deteriorated pavement and reconstructed 4" of hot mix asphalt over 9" of aggregate base along Jonquil Drive and Poppy Court; and
WHEREAS, the awarded contract was in the amount of $ 643, 718 and a 15% construction contingency of $ 96, 558 was authorized for staff to use as necessary to achieve the goals of the project; and
WHEREAS, during construction, contract change orders totaling $ 96, 235 were issued for a final contract amount of $739, 953; and
WHEREAS, Knife River has completed the construction of the project; staff inspected and the City Engineer deemed the improvements complete and in accordance with the approved plans and specifications; and WHEREAS, Knife River has provided the necessary lien releases for the materials supplied and completed work; and
WHEREAS, Knife River has submitted a one- year warranty bond ( based on 10% of total project cost) for the improvements being accepted; and WHEREAS, the performance and payment bonds ( 190- 056- 260/ 108078550) will be released and replaced with a one- year warranty bond ( Bond No. 108078550, 73, 995) upon City Council' s
acceptance of the improvements; and
WHEREAS, adequate funds were allocated in Fiscal Year 24/5budget to close out CIP PS 25- 07. With the completion of this project, staff request that unused funds be transferred back into the General Fund Street Repair Reserves ( 1010); and WHEREAS, staff request City Council accept the public improvements constructed by Knife River for Jonquil Drive and Poppy Court Pavement Rehabilitation, CIP PS 25- 07; and
441
WHEREAS, staff also request City Council authorize the filing of a Notice of Completion with the San Joaquin County Clerk upon acceptance of the improvements and the release of the contract retention to Knife River in the amount of $ 36, 998 within forty-ive (45) days after the recording of the Notice of Completion, and the release of the performance and payment bonds.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lathrop does hereby accept the public improvements constructed by Knife River for Jonquil Drive and Poppy Court Pavement Rehabilitation, CIP PS 25- 07; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lathrop authorizes the filing of the Notice of Completion with the San Joaquin County Clerk and the release of the contract retention to Knife River, in the amount of $ 36, 998 within forty-ive (45) days after the recording of the Notice of Completion, and authorizes the release of the performance and payment bonds; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that City Council also authorizes the transfer of the unused project funds into the General Fund Street Repair Reserves ( 1010) as detailed above.
442
The foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 12th day of May 2025, by the following vote of the City Council, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Paul Akinjo, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Teresa Vargas, City Clerk Salvador Navarrete, City Attorney 443
ATTACHMENT
g"
RECORDING REQUESTED BY, AND
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
CITY OF LATHROP
ATTN: CITY CLERK
390 TOWNE CENTRE DRIVE
LATHROP, CA 95330
Exempt from payment ofrecording fees ( GC 11922)
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER' SUSE
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN:
1. That the interest or estate stated in paragraph 3 herein in the real property herein described is owned by:
NAME STREET AND NO. CITY STATE
City of Lathrop 390 Towne Centre Drive Lathrop CA 95330 If more than one owner of the interest stated, the name and address of each must be stated)
2. That the full name and address of the owner of said interest or estate, if there is only one owner, and that the full names and addresses of all the co - owners who own said interest or estate as tenants in common, as joint tenants, or otherwise, if there is more than one owner, are set forth in the preceding paragraph.
3. That the nature of the title of stated owner, or if more than one owner, then of the stated owner and co - owners is fee title (e.g. fee title, leasehold, joint tenancy, etc.).
4. That on the 12th day of May 2025 a work of improvement on the real property herein described was completed.
5. That the name ofthe original contractor, if any, for said work ofimprovement was: DSS Company dba Knife River Construction
6. That the name and address of the transferor is:
NAME STREET AND NO.
DSS Company dba 655 West Clay Street
Knife River Construction
CITY STATE
Stockton CA 95206
7. That the real property herein referred to is situated in the City of Lathrop County of San Joaquin, State of California, and is described as follows:
CIP PS 25- 07 Jonquil Drive and Poppy Court Pavement Rehabilitation That the undersigned has knowledge of the contents herein and states under penalty ofperjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
CITY OF LATHROP
By:
By:
Stephen J. Salvatore, City Manager Date
Teresa Vargas, City Clerk Date
444
CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the NOTICE OF COMPLETION dated May 12, 2025 by DSS Company dba Knife River Construction to the City of Lathrop, a political corporation and/ or governmental agency, is hereby accepted by the undersigned officer or agent on behalf of the City Council pursuant to authority conferred by minute action of the City Council adopted on May 12, 2025, and the grantee consents to recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer.
Dated By
Stephen J. Salvatore, City Manager
445
PAGE LEFT
INTENTIONALLY
BLANK
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
ITEM 4. 22
CITY MANAGER' SREPORT
MAY 12, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
ITEM:
RECOMMENDATION:
CREATE MOSSDALE COMMUNITY SIDEWALK
REPAIRS, CIP PS 25-5 AND APPROVE BUDGET
AMENDMENT
Adopt Resolution to Approve Creation of
Mossdale Community Sidewalk Repairs, CIP PS
25-5 and Approve Budget Amendment
SUMMARY:
Capital Improvement Project ( CIP) PS 25-5 for Mossdale Community Sidewalk Repairs ( Project) is recommended to remove and replace lifted and broken sidewalk within the Mossdale residential community. The Project scope of work consists of removing damaged sidewalk panels and constructing new 5 feet wide concrete segments. Staff request City Council approve the creation of CIP PS 25-5 for Mossdale Community Sidewalk Repairs to remove tripping hazards and maintain Americans with Disabilities Act ( ADA) compliance.
Through the San Joaquin Council of Governments ( SJCOG), the City of Lathrop received $ 123, 097of Measure K Non -Competitive funds for pedestrian improvements that will be used towards design and construction of the Project. The proposed CIP PS 25-5 will also use the available funding from Local Transportation Funds ( LTF) Fiscal Year ( FY) 2024/5pedestrian improvements and the remaining balance from completed project CIP PS 22- 18. Staff is also requesting the approval of a budget amendment to recognize the Measure K funding and transfer the available LTF funds to the CIP Project Fund ( 3310).
BACKGROUND:
The Mossdale residential area was designed with sidewalks and landscaping to provide connectivity throughout the community. Over time, tree roots have lifted the sidewalk and created tripping hazards at several locations. To help prevent injuries caused by tripping, staff proposes to create CIP PS 25-5 to remove and replace the broken and lifted sidewalk panels within the Mossdale community area.
The Project scope of work will consist of site inspections, assessment, demolition and removal of damaged concrete sections and tree roots, installation of root barriers, and construction of 5 feet wide concrete sidewalk to meet ADA standards and slope requirements.
455
CITY MANAGER' S REPORT PAGE 2
MAY 12, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
CREATE MOSSDALE COMMUNITY SIDEWALK REPAIRS, CIP PS 25-5 AND
APPROVE BUDGET AMENDMENT
REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION:
Creation of CIP PS 25- 15 is recommended to repair broken sidewalk panels to maintain ADA- compliant pedestrian connectivity throughout the Mossdale residential community. Approving a budget amendment will provide funding for design and construction expenses until reimbursement of Measure K funds from SJCOG is received. Staff will return at a later Council meeting to recommend Council approve a contract for construction of the Project.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The City received $ 123, 097 of Measure K Non -Competitive funds from SJCOG for pedestrian improvements that will be used towards design and construction of the Project. Staff is requesting Council approve a budget amendment recognizing the Measure K funds and transferring the available LTF funding from CIP PS 22- 18 to the CIP Project Fund ( 3310) as follows:
Decrease Transfer In
3310- 9900- 393- 0000 PS 22- 18 $ 20, 690
Increase Transfer In
3310- 9900- 393- 0000 PS 25-5 $ 20, 690
Increase Transfer Out
2140- 9900-90- 9010 $ 54,76
Increase Transfer In
3310- 9900- 393- 0000 PS 25-5 $ 54,76
Increase Revenue
2110- 8000- 332- 01-0
Increase Transfer Out
2110- 9900-90- 9010
Increase Transfer In
3310- 9900- 393- 0000
Increase Expenditure
3310- 8000- 420- 10
ATTACHMENTS:
123, 097
123, 097
PS 25-5 $ 123, 097
PS 25-5 $ 198, 363
A. Resolution to Approve Creation of Mossdale Community Sidewalk Repairs, CIP PS 25-5 and Approve Budget Amendment
B. Project Location Map
456
CITY MANAGER' S REPORT PAGE 3
MAY 12, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
CREATE MOSSDALE COMMUNITY SIDEWALK REPAIRS, CIP PS 25-5 AND
APPROVE BUDGET AMENDMENT
APPROVALS:
An 5arca
Assistant Engineer
Bra Taylor
City Engineer
0 - 07 - ZOLc"
Date
5/ 1/ 5
Date
5' • 7. Zozs
Michael King Date
Assistant City Manager
ri J
Financ ctor
Date
Salvador Navarrete Date
City Attorney
s•zV
Stephen J. Salvatore Date
City Manager
457
RESOLUTION NO. 25 -
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LATHROP
TO APPROVE CREATION OF MOSSDALE COMMUNITY SIDEWALK REPAIRS, CIP PS 25-5 AND APPROVE BUDGET AMENDMENT
WHEREAS, Capital Improvement Project ( CIP) PS 25-5 for Mossdale Community Sidewalk Repairs ( Project) is recommended to remove and replace lifted and broken sidewalk within the Mossdale residential community; and WHEREAS, the Project scope of work will consist of site inspections, assessment, demolition and removal of damaged concrete sections and tree roots, installation of root barriers, and construction of 5 feet wide concrete sidewalk to meet Americans with Disabilities Act ( ADA) standards and slope requirements; and WHEREAS, staff request City Council approve the creation of CIP PS 25-5 for Mossdale Community Sidewalk Repairs to remove tripping hazards and maintain ADA compliance; and
WHEREAS, staff will return at a later Council meeting to recommend Council approve a contract for construction of the Project; and WHEREAS, through the San Joaquin Council of Governments ( SJC0G), the City of Lathrop received $ 123, 097 of Measure K Non -Competitive funds for pedestrian improvements that will be used towards design and construction of the Project; and WHEREAS, the proposed CIP PS 25-5 will also use the available funding from Local Transportation Funds ( LTF) Fiscal Year ( FY) 2024/5 pedestrian improvements and the remaining balance from completed project CIP PS 22- 18; and WHEREAS, staff is requesting Council approve a budget amendment recognizing the Measure K funds and transferring the available LTF funding from CIP PS 22- 18 to the CIP Project Fund ( 3310) as follows:
Decrease Transfer In
3310- 9900- 393- 0000 PS 22- 18 $ 20, 690
Increase Transfer In
3310- 9900- 393- 0000 PS 25-5 $ 20, 690
Increase Transfer Out
2140- 9900-90- 9010 $ 54,76
Increase Transfer In
3310- 9900- 393- 0000 PS 25-5 $ 54,76
Increase Revenue
2110- 8000- 332- 01-0
Increase Transfer Out
2110- 9900-90- 9010
123, 097
123, 097
458
Increase Transfer In
3310- 9900- 393- 0000
Increase Expenditure
3310- 8000- 420- 10
PS 25-5
PS 25-5
123, 097
198, 363
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lathrop hereby creates Capital Improvement Project ( CIP) PS 25-5 for Mossdale Community Sidewalk Repairs; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that City Council also approves a budget amendment recognizing $ 123, 097 from Measure K and transferring LTF funds to the CIP Project Fund as detailed above.
459
The foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 12th day of May 2025, by the following vote of the City Council, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Paul Akinjo, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Teresa Vargas, City Clerk Salvador Navarrete, City Attorney 460
N
a
rt
4 ATTAdHMENT
o Ct
c
EGENDI
0 0. 1
R
ac •
A 444
ome$ tead Ave
w Weft A4 o6t4 N se
b \
N
ell of c,
Ne' t Islands Pkwy
Redaa"`
Pl ''•
ss. ssE g1,
l et
aae.... 0ac` eAve
nunnrL
s'
e-c\ Faso` S
Goa
co y
Q•• Z• 4 1
iv
a: , per Soo 3,
C, t
q.
e
The
Gres,,
4*
G! wG P•4°•••
c,,'" 4 q a,
4• d
klo aide
Common
Towne Centre Dr
tbsadao
La ndr rq
mmunir, P. xt.
Pen R, anae Ave
Pasture Ave
8rambtewood Ave
v
sy
n
4frlipond Ave
tl
C
Danbury VI
d
Nut Tree Ct
m
r
r
e
o
r 2
n
T. O
n
ss e rn a -
r:IIer 2 o
c
o
r 24 P„ ' Si ( j - 2
Q
Ssi t' % Cold Springs St o
Y
in 0
4.•.,,,,
GraPevine PI c
q
v
A
LS 4°. 90
Scrub Oak Dr
s
e.
e...**,
LYr d Oak Dr
0. 2
IMiles
r2, Emory Oak PI
90,
ganberry
Way
kfllitt
vm
Prim
me,
Lathrop Towne Centre: Dr
o.
C
Autumn Rain Dr o°`
k 5'
b • o •
C . 7_ • c' .
b
r7 U _ b• p •
4 ` •
F a
Crescent Moon Or •
American Farms q •r •
3 •
n • a
n <
d{-'
Ridge Ave •
03 Btookhurst Blvd
m
ir O
u
S E
m
C
a i.fil.. er .Oak...: reDr
Sources: Esri, 1nHEERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri o
Japan, METI, Esri China ( Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri ( Thailand), NGCC, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
W Louise Ave
Somerville St
b
CC
f1
Project Limits
E Louise A•:
Arc, p4 N, y
Nestle
way
a
3 PROJECT LOCATION MAP
CIP PS 25-5
461
PAGE LEFT
INTENTIONALLY
BLANK
462
ITEM 4. 23
CITY MANAGER' SREPORT
MAY 12, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
ITEM: CREATE CONSOLIDATED TREATMENT FACILITY
PHASE 4 EXPANSION, CIP WW 25-6, APPROVE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH
PACIFIC ADVANCED CIVIL ENGINEERING, INC. FOR
DESIGN SERVICES AND APPROVE BUDGET
AMENDMENT
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution to Create Consolidated Treatment Facility Phase 4 Expansion, CIP WW 25-6, Approve
Professional Services Agreement with Pacific
Advanced Civil Engineering, Inc. for Design Services,
and Approve Budget Amendment
SUMMARY:
On April 14, 2025, City Council approved the creation of Capital Improvement Project CIP) WW 25-3 for the McKinley Avenue Force Main Intertie ( Intertie) and a Professional Services Agreement ( PSA) with Black Water Consulting Engineers to establish a connection between the Manteca Wastewater Quality Control Facility MWQCF) and the Lathrop Consolidated Treatment Facility ( CTF) to allow for the efficient transfer of wastewater based on demand and system resiliency.
The CTF needs to be expanded to process the additional flows that will be diverted with the Intertie. Staff is proposing the Phase 4 Expansion of the CTF to add 2 Million Gallons per Day ( MGD) of treatment capacity. The addition of this capacity will accommodate the build - out flows for the City and will therefore be the final expansion of the CTF. Staff received a proposal from Pacific Advanced Civil Engineering, Inc.
PACE) in the amount of $ 693, 754to complete design of the Phase 4 Expansion.
Staff request City Council approve the creation of a new Capital Improvement Project CIP) WW 25-6, Consolidated Treatment Facility Phase 4 Expansion. Staff also request City Council approve a Professional Services Agreement ( PSA) with PACE in the amount of $693, 754 and a budget amendment transferring $ 750, 00 from Sewer Connection Fee Fund ( 6030) to the CIP Project Fund to fund the design of the Phase 4 Expansion in addition to any related items that may come up during the design phase.
BACKGROUND:
On November 8, 2021, City Council approved a PSA with PACE for design of the CTF Phase 3 Expansion, CIP WW 25-6. City Council approved a contract to GSE Construction, Inc. for the construction of the Phase 3 Expansion on August 12, 2024.
Construction of the Phase 3 Expansion began on September 5, 2024, and is anticipated to be completed in spring of 2026. The Phase 3 Expansion was advanced 463
CITY MANAGER' SREPORT PAGE 2
MAY 12, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
CREATE CONSOLIDATED TREATMENT FACILITY PHASE 4 EXPANSION, CIP WW 25-6, APPROVE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH PACIFIC ADVANCED CIVIL ENGINEERING, INC. FOR DESIGN SERVICES AND APPROVE
BUDGET AMENDMENT
to support new development within the City, primarily River Islands who contributed 80% of the cost. With the completion of the Phase 3 Expansion, the CTF will have the capacity to process 4 MGD of wastewater.
On April 14, 2025, City Council approved the creation of CIP WW 25-3 for the Intertie and a PSA with Black Water Consulting Engineers to establish a connection between the MWQCF and the CTF to allow for the efficient transfer of wastewater based on demand and system resiliency.
The CTF needs to be expanded to process the additional flows that will be diverted with the Intertie. Staff is proposing the Phase 4 Expansion of the CTF to add 2 MGD of treatment capacity. The addition of this capacity will accommodate the build - out flows for the City and will therefore be the final expansion of the CTF. Staff received a proposal from PACE in the amount of $693, 754 to complete design of the Phase 4 Expansion. Phase 4 consists of building two more aeration tanks, headworks and installing other related appurtenances.
REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION:
The CTF needs to be expanded to process the additional flows that will be diverted with the Intertie. Staff is proposing the Phase 4 Expansion of the CTF to add 2 MGD of treatment capacity. The addition of this capacity to the existing 4 MGD capacity will accommodate the build -out flows for the City and will therefore be the final expansion of the CTF.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Staff request a budget amendment transferring $750, 00from the Sewer Connection Fee Fund ( 6030) to the CIP Project Fund is requested as detailed below:
Increase Transfer Out
6030- 9900-90- 9- 1
Increase Transfer In
6090- 900- 393- 00- WW 25-6
Increase Appropriation
6090- 8000- 420- 84- 00 WW 25-6
750, 00
750, 00
750, 00
464
CITY MANAGER' S REPORT PAGE 3
MAY 12, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
CREATE CONSOLIDATED TREATMENT FACILITY PHASE 4 EXPANSION, CIP WW 25-6, APPROVE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH PACIFIC ADVANCED CIVIL ENGINEERING, INC. FOR DESIGN SERVICES AND APPROVE
BUDGET AMENDMENT
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Resolution to Create Consolidated Treatment Facility Phase 4 Expansion, CIP WW 25-6, Approve Professional Services Agreement with Pacific Advanced Civil Engineering, Inc. for Design Services, and Approve Budget Amendment.
B. Professional Services Agreement with Pacific Advanced Civil Engineering, Inc. for Design Services for CTF Phase 4 Expansion - CIP WW 25-6 465
CITY MANAGER' SREPORT PAGE 4
MAY 12, 2025 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
CREATE CONSOLIDATED TREATMENT FACILITY PHASE 4 EXPANSION, CIP WW 25-6, APPROVE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH PACIFIC ADVANCED CIVIL ENGINEERING, INC. FOR DESIGN SERVICES AND APPROVE
BUDGET AMENDMENT
APPROVALS:
BracVl aylor
City Engineer
Cari Ja
Finance ctor
Date
Date
Li/ 745K- c
Michael King Date
Assistant City Manager
5-• 7• Zc7S
Salvador Navarrete Date
City Attorney
5. 25
Stephen J. Salvatore Date
City Manager
466
RESOLUTION NO. 25-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LATHROP TO CREATE CONSOLIDATED TREATMENT FACILITY PHASE 4 EXPANSION, CIP WW 25- 26, APPROVE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH PACIFIC ADVANCED CIVIL ENGINEERING, INC. FOR DESIGN SERVICES, AND
APPROVE BUDGET AMENDMENT
WHEREAS, on November 8, 2021, City Council approved a PSA with PACE for design of the CTF Phase 3 Expansion, CIP WW 25-6. City Council approved a contract to GSE Construction, Inc. for the construction of the Phase 3 Expansion on August 12, 2024. Construction of the Phase 3 Expansion began on September 5, 2024, and is anticipated to be completed in spring of 2026; and WHEREAS, the Phase 3 Expansion was advanced to support new development within the City, primarily River Islands who contributed 80% of the cost. With the completion of the Phase 3 Expansion, the CTF will have the capacity to process 4 Million Gallons per Day ( MGD) of wastewater; and
WHEREAS, on April 14, 2025, City Council approved the creation of Capital Improvement Project ( CIP) WW 25-3 for the McKinley Avenue Force Main Intertie Intertie) and a Professional Services Agreement ( PSA) with Black Water Consulting Engineers to establish a connection between the Manteca Wastewater Quality Control Facility ( MWQCF) and the Lathrop Consolidated Treatment Facility ( CTF) to allow for the efficient transfer of wastewater based on demand and system resiliency; and WHEREAS, the CTF needs to be expanded to process the additional flows that will be diverted with the Intertie. Staff is proposing the Phase 4 Expansion of the CTF to add 2 MGD of treatment capacity. The addition of this capacity will accommodate the build - out flows for the City and will therefore be the final expansion of the CTF; and
WHEREAS, staff received a proposal from Pacific Advanced Civil Engineering, Inc. (PACE) in the amount of $693, 754 to complete design of the Phase 4 Expansion; and
WHEREAS, staff request City Council approve the creation of a new Capital Improvement Project ( CIP) WW 25-6, Consolidated Treatment Facility Phase 4 Expansion. Staff also request City Council approve a Professional Services Agreement ( PSA) with PACE in the amount of $ 693, 754 and a budget amendment transferring $ 750, 00 from Sewer Connection Fee Fund ( 6030) to the CIP Project Fund to fund the design of the Phase 4 Expansion in addition to any related items that may come up during the design phase:
467
Increase Transfer Out
6030- 9900-90- 9- 1
Increase Transfer In
6090- 900- 393- 00- WW 25-6
Increase Appropriation
6090- 8000- 420- 84- 00 WW 25-6
750, 00
750, 00
750, 00
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lathrop does hereby approve the creation of a new Capital Improvement Project CIP) WW 25-6, Consolidated Treatment Facility Phase 4 Expansion; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lathrop does hereby approve a Professional Services Agreement with PACE in the amount of 693, 754 for the design of the Phase 4 Expansion; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lathrop does hereby approve a budget amendment transferring $ 750, 00 from Sewer Connection Fee Fund ( 6030) to the CIP Project Fund as detailed above. 468
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Lathrop this 12th day of May 2025, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Paul Akinjo, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Teresa Vargas, City Clerk Salvador Navarrete, City Attorney 469
ATTACHMENT
I. B.- „
CITY OF LATHROP
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES WITH PACIFIC ADVANCED CIVIL ENGINEERING, INC.
TO PROVIDE ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES FOR THE CONSOLIDATED TREATMENT FACILITY PHASE 4 EXPANSION - CIP WW 25-6
THIS AGREEMENT, dated for convenience this l2t'' of May, 2025 is by and between Pacific Advanced Civil Engineering (" CONSULTANT") and the City of Lathrop, a California municipal corporation (" CITY");
RECITALS:
WHEREAS, CONSULTANT is specially trained, experienced, and competent to perform Professional Services, which are required by this agreement; and WHEREAS, CITY selected the CONSULTANT pursuant to said qualifications; and WHEREAS, CONSULTANT is willing to render such Professional Services, as hereinafter defined, on the following terms and conditions;
NOW, THEREFORE, CONSULTANT and the CITY agree as follows:
AGREEMENT
1) Scope of Service
CONSULTANT agrees to perform Professional Services in accordance with the scope of work and fee proposal provided by CONSULTANT, attached hereto as Exhibit " A" and incorporated herein by reference. CONSULTANT represents it is prepared to and can diligently perform these services in accordance with the upmost standards of its profession and to CITY' Ssatisfaction. The fee proposal shall include all reimbursable costs required for the performance of the Scope of Services. Payment of additional reimbursable costs considered to be over and above those inherent in the original Scope of Services shall be approved of in advance and in writing, by the CITY.
2) Compensation
CITY hereby agrees to pay CONSULTANT a sum not to exceed $ 693, 754, for the Professional Services set forth in Exhibit " A". CONSULTANT shall be paid any uncontested sum due and payable within thirty (30) days of receipt of billings containing all information pursuant to Paragraph 5 below. Compensation for any task must be equal to or less than the percentage of task complete. In no event shall CONSULTANT be entitled to compensation for work not included in Exhibit "A", unless a written change order or authorization describing the extra work and payment terms has been executed by CITY' s authorized representative prior to the commencement of the work. Payment is made based on a time and materials basis.