Statements
TJKM has included our Cost Proposal in a separate sealed file.
TJKM does not have any exceptions to any portion of the Request for Proposal.
TJKM is receipt of Addendum 1 dated November 25, 2025.
Contact and Commitment
As President of the firm, I am authorized to bind TJKM to a contract and you have my personal assurance that all the resources necessary to address the City ’s needs will be made available and ready to perform when the opportunity arises. Y ou can reach me by phone at (408) 410-2977 or via email at [email protected]. During the proposal process, please feel free to contact Mr. Burgett at (925) 264-5021 or [email protected]. Mailed Correspondence can be sent to 4305 Hacienda Drive, Suite 550, Pleasanton, CA 94588.
The TJKM Team is committed to providing professional services to the satisfaction of the City . We look forward to hearing from you regarding further steps in the consultant selection process.
Sincerely,
TJKM Transportation Consultants
Nayan Amin, TE, President
407
UPDATE TO THE BIKEWAYS MASTER PLAN
City of Lincoln
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Consultant Identification .....................................................................................................................................................1 Project Understanding and Work Plan ................................................................................................................................1 Understanding of the Project .......................................................................................................................................1 Approach to Meeting Task Objectives ..........................................................................................................................1 Scope of Work ..............................................................................................................................................................2 Schedule .......................................................................................................................................................................4 Level of Effort ...............................................................................................................................................................4 Related Project/Client Information .....................................................................................................................................5 Individual Staff Experience and Project Organization .........................................................................................................6 TJKM Overview .............................................................................................................................................................6 Project Organization Chart ...........................................................................................................................................7 Key Staff Bios ................................................................................................................................................................7 Subconsultant ...............................................................................................................................................................8 Current Commitments..................................................................................................................................................8 Staff Commitment ........................................................................................................................................................8
Appendices
Appendix A- Key Staff Resumes
Appendix B – Project Descriptions
Appendix C – Forms
.
408
UPDATE TO THE BIKEWAYS MASTER PLAN
City of Lincoln
1 TJKM Transportation Consultants (TJKM) is pleased to submit our Proposal to provide an Update to the Bi keways Master Plan to the City of Lincoln.
CONSULTANT IDENTIFICATION
T J K M is our legal name, doing business as TJKM Transportation Consultants. Our mailing and physical address is 4305 Hacienda Drive, Suite 550, Pleasanton, CA 94588. Nayan Amin is the President of TJKM and can be reached at 408.410.2977 or [email protected]. Colin Burgett is your proposed Project Manager; he can be reached at 415.342.1556 or [email protected].
PROJECT UNDERSTANDING AND WORK PLAN
Understanding of the Project
The Bikeways Master Plan update will build off of the City’s current plan that was last updated in 2018 to reassess community needs and priorities, re-engage the public, and develop recommendations for short-term and long-term projects to enhance bicycle transportation in Lincoln and to improve inter-community travel to and from adjacent jurisdictions. All work must be completed by July 2026.
Approach to Meeting Task Objectives
Based on our extensive experience working on similar projects, the TJKM Team will proceed in updating the Plan taking into consideration the 6 “E’s” – Engineering, Encouragement, Education, Enforcement, Equity, and Evaluation. The involvement of the community in the development of the Plan is critical to its success. Our proposed approach highlights key points for updating the Plan and are summarized briefly below:
• Community Values: We understand from our past experience on similar projects the community’s concerns with quality of life and traffic impacts. We will build on our experience through integration with the community outreach process that will help us identify concerns, build consensus for desired community attributes, and allow our team to incorporate the values of the community into the alternatives.
We will utilize o ur time with community members to discuss their thoughts on what makes this community different from other communities in the region.
Is it the people, the architectural character, the history, or perhaps something else that makes it special? By documenting existing conditions during the data collection and analysis phase (Task 2), we will provide information to communicate with the community and Stakeholders and allow them to respond to what they feel most strongly represents their community. The feedback received will be utilized to develop a responsive Plan that reflects the community’s spirit and develop.
• Innovative Solutions: The Plan will build off the existing 2018 Plan, and balance technical considerations and safety for all modes of transportation with good design and complete streets principles. Our team of innovators works to balance current and local standards with new developing approaches. Our team will draw from our history in bicycle/pedestrian planning, land use and economic analysis, innovation to assist in developing alternatives that are feasible. We will utilize current local and national best practices, treatment selection tools, and other methods to evaluate a range of solutions including standard and innovative solutions. We will identify which solutions are included in state and federal guidelines and identify jurisdictions that have successfully
implemented.
Community Driven Process : We view
community outreach as an integral part of the
process in updating the 2018 plan. Developing
an understanding of the Plan from the end
user’s point of view – whether they are the
general public, business owners, or agency
representatives – is essential to the success of
the Plan. It will be our goal to work closely with
the City staff to maximize the outreach effort,
engage the community, and develop a Plan that
addresses the specific issues that are being
faced under existing conditions. A thought ful
review of past and existing planning work in the
409
UPDATE TO THE BIKEWAYS MASTER PLAN
City of Lincoln
2 area will provide the necessary background and understanding prior to the community meetings . Stakeholder and community meetings and workshops will be utilized to understand challenges and concerns and develop the Plan that address the feedback received.
TJKM will provide a focused update of the Bikeways Master Plan that includes the following:
• A successful plan requires a solid understanding of the existing policy and regulatory framework which impacts active transportation, including General Plans, planning studies, expenditure plans, and guidelines. TJKM will conduct a plan and policy review t o identify regional and local efforts, status , and progress made on previous planning efforts and studies with a goal to ensure that the updated plan complements existing and prior efforts. • Goals, objectives, and performance measures are key in creating and implementing a successful plan. TJKM will consider a range of goals (short, medium, and long), objectives, and performance measures that align with prior plans and goals of the City and region and in accordance with local, state, and federal policies and guidelines. Examples of measuring successful performance indicators include comparing increases in bicycling and walking mode share, growth and investment in active transportation infrastructure, miles of new bike paths, bike lanes, or sidewalks, among others. These will form the baseline indicators for performance measures. Additionally, during project outreach efforts we will introduce goals and objectives to the community to solicit input. This approach wi ll help in developing performance measures that utilize community support as an indicator to help with prioritizing projects into short, medium, and long- term categories.
• TJKM will conduct an Existing Conditions Review that will be muti -faceted including a Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and demographics analysis, Bicycle Level of Traffic Stress analysis, collision data review and safety analysis. • TJKM with assistance from Gates Studio will work closely with City staff to ensure a successful community workshop to receive input on the Draft Plan. Our team members are skilled at preparing effective visuals and maps to display at pop- up events, workshops, and Bicyclist and Pedestrian Advisory Committees ( BPAC) meetings that facilitate input and maximize participation.
• TJKM has specialized expertise from conducting local roadway safety plans for many jurisdictions that will be useful in supporting the City’s goals to implement Vision Zero principles and improve street safety. • TJKM is familiar with the most recent design guidance and provides street design expertise that is unmatched for purposes of identifying effective and feasible complete streets improvements including low -stress bikeways and enhanced pedestrian paths to achieve the City’s goals to maximize the safety and mobility of cyclists and pedestrians.
Scope of Work
Based on the Scope of Work identified in the Request for Proposal, TJKM’s work scope will include the following tasks:
TASK 1 – PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND MEETINGS
• Prepare all necessary meeting agendas and meeting minutes for the successful completion of this project. • Monitor the progress of the project to ensure compliance with City schedule and budget.
Deliverables specified by the Request for Proposal:
Summary of services performed with invoices, meeting agendas and meeting minutes TJKM Approach: Within a week of notice-to-proceed, TJKM will facilitate a Kick-Off Meeting with City staff to:
• Discuss project goals and objectives
• Finalize project schedule and identify key milestones • Discuss and confirm critical data needs and data sharing protocol Throughout the course of the project, TJKM will conduct monthly check-in calls with the City’s project manager and will be available on short notice for additional as-needed meetings. The TJKM Team will prepare meeting materials including agenda, sign-in sheets where applicable, related handouts, and summarize meeting notes and action items.
TASK 2 – DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
• Utilize record drawings and field surveys where necessary • Utilize available GIS based system data
• Utilize General Plan Data
• Utilize Specific Plan Data, where available
410
UPDATE TO THE BIKEWAYS MASTER PLAN
City of Lincoln
3 Deliverables specified by the Request for Proposal:
Updated exhibit showing existing and proposed bicycle and trail facilities with current City Limits and Sphere of Influence in pdf format and as GIS file
TJKM Approach: TJKM will identify and include new data (since the previous plan was adopted in 2018) to evaluate the suitability of pedestrian or bicyclist travel along street segments. This will include a description of bikeway facilities completed since the 2018 plan was prepared. In addition, this shall include an updated bicycle Level of Traffic Stress (LTS) analysis, and an updated collision analysis as described below. In addition, the TJKM Team proposes to augment the data collection by providing a project website that will be created by Gates Studio to advertise the Plan update and solicit initial input for incorporation into the Data Collection and Analysis task. The project website will include an interactive map for members of the public to provide input concerning key improvement needs, as well as a survey to gather related feedback.
Bicycle Level of Traffic Stress (LTS). TJKM will update the LTS analysis for bicycle facilities that was prepared for the 2018 plan, consistent with the criteria developed by the Mineta Transportation Institute. The LTS analysis will be conducted on the City’s arterial and collector streets. LTS analysis uses conditions on a street segment or intersection to predict the comfort experienced by a bicyclist. The goal is to identify where there are high- stress connections or crossings that should be addressed to improve overall connectivity of the low-stress bicycle facility network. TJKM will utilize bicycle network data in GIS format to conduct the analysis and produce the final maps. The maps will identify key barriers to low-stress connectivity, suggesting where bicycle facility improvements should be focused to create comfortable routes to destinations that will be appealing to a greater number of potential bicyclists. The updated LTS analysis will be included in the revised Existing Conditions chapter of the Master Plan document.
Collision Analysis. TJKM will analyze the most recent 10 years of available data from the Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) and prepare maps and other exhibits to illustrate locations or characteristics of collisions in the City for people bicycling. Data will be reviewed to identify both locations with a history of reported collisions (“hot spots”), as well as risk factors for fatal and severe injury locations. TJKM will also review data related to contributing factors, traffic violations , environmental conditions, injury severity, determinations of fault, and movements or behavior of involved parties preceding the reported collisions. This analysis will be documented in narrative form, as well as maps and other exhibits, which will be included in the revised Existing Conditions chapter of the Master Plan document.
TASK 3 – MASTER PLAN DOCUMENT
• Produce Draft Master Plan Document
• Submit draft plan in electronic form for review
• Present draft plan at a community meeting. City staff will provide community invitation and a meeting space • Produce Final Master Plan Document
• Produce a final Bikeways Master Plan document that compiles all the results of the preceding tasks • Submit four hard copies and an electronic copy in both PDF and Microsoft Word Deliverables specified by the Request for Proposal:
Draft and Final Master Plan Reports
Updated GIS file showing existing and proposed bicycle and trail facilities TJKM Approach: Gates Studio will lead preparation for the community meeting as a subconsultant to TJKM. Gates and TJKM will coordinate exhibits/materials and facilitate discussion concerning the Draft Master Plan.
TJKM will provide a concise, user-friendly draft and final master plan document that achieves the following:
• Describes the bikeway projects completed since the 2018 plan was adopted and updates the City’s existing bikeway network map in GIS to include those bikeways.
• Provides updated estimates of bicycle ridership levels in Lincoln as a percent of total trips (not limited to home-to-work trips) utilizing “Big Data” sources.
• Provides updated assessments of bicycle level of traffic stress (LTS) and collisions (as described in Task 2). • Provides updated assessment of network connectivity, barriers, and gaps. • Incorporates community input received during the Bikeway Plan update, as well as any relevant community input from recent years relayed by City staff.
• Provides updated goals, objectives, and policies where relevant based on staff and community input and the review of existing conditions.
• Updates the City’s bicycle facility design guidelines to reflect the latest national/regional guidance. 411
UPDATE TO THE BIKEWAYS MASTER PLAN
City of Lincoln
4 • Assesses the efficacy of the City’s bicycle capital improvement program and revises these recommendations based on input from the public combined with a comprehensive assessment of bicycle connectivity relative to existing and future development patterns.
• Provides recommended updates to ensure provision of a future bicycle network that connects all areas of significance in the city with facilities and routes that are more in line with the majority of potential bicyclist’s comfort levels, including updated bikeway plan maps in GIS.
• Provides updated estimates of bicycle demand, mode shift and planning level cost estimates to inform bicycle capital improvement cost-effectiveness for funding prioritization. • Provides updated recommendations concerning future bikeway facilities, prioritized based on anticipated usage and ability to accomplish the City’s adopted goals and policies relevant to bicycle transportation. • Provides an updated Plan that continues to serve as a one -stop data source to facilitate the development of future state/federal grant funding applications for bicycle improvements by the City of Lincoln.
Schedule
As stated in the Request for Proposal, the duration of services is anticipated to begin in January 2026, and all work must be completed by June 2026. The TJKM Team is committed and qualified to meet the City’s scheduling requirement. TJKM provides an experienced team with specific strengths in each of the areas required to deliver this project on schedule and within budget to the satisfaction of the City of Lincoln. Our proposed team has a proven track record of successful similar projects and is de dicated to providing high-quality products. We have developed an individualized approach for each task that, combined with an active project management and team -oriented approach, will ensure the delivery of timely, high- quality services. Our staff team has the availability to accept and complete this key project on schedule and within budget.
Level of Effort
Below we have included a table showing the estimated hours to complete each task and the level of effort in hours for the key staff.
Nayan
Amin
Colin
Burgett
Ruta
Jariwala
Amit
Kothari
Rutvij
Patel
Erik
Bjorkland
Praveena
Samaleti
Himangi
Mutha
Utsav
Domadia
Grishma
Pandaya
Kavita
Jain
Aaditya
Patel
Chuck
Gardella
Rebecca
Flanegan
PIC
Project
Manager
Task
Lead
Project
Engineer
GIS
Specialist Partner
Outreach
Coordinator
Task 1. Project Management & Meetings 2 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 16 0 4 0 4 20 Task 2A. Data Collection & Analysis 4 32 8 0 0 0 16 16 16 60 24 24 200 0 0 0 0 200 Task 2B. Project Website 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 16 0 8 10 18 34 Task 3A. Draft Master Plan Document 4 52 28 16 16 16 6 24 28 68 30 16 304 4 16 8 28 332 3A.a. Draft Plan 4 44 20 16 16 16 6 16 28 60 30 16 272 0 0 0 0 272 3A.b. Community Meeting 0 8 8 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 0 0 32 4 16 8 28 60 Task 3B: Final Master Plan Document 2 34 16 6 6 6 4 4 8 8 8 8 110 0 0 0 0 110 Total 12 130 54 22 22 22 26 44 52 152 62 48 646 4 28 18 50 696 Total
Hours
by
Task
Production
TJKM Transportation Consultants
Gates
Hours
by Task
Gates Studio
Project Planner
TJKM
Hours
by TaskTask
Plan
Recommendations
412
UPDATE TO THE BIKEWAYS MASTER PLAN
City of Lincoln
5 RELATED PROJECT/CLIENT INFORMATION
Below are samples of our experience in performing work of a similar nature to that described in the Request for Proposal.
ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN, TULARE | 2024-ONGOING | $220K | TJKM Reference: Stev en Sopp, Principal Planner, City of Tulare, 411 E Kern Avenue , Tulare, CA 93274 , (559) 684 -4216, [email protected]
TJKM is developing an ATP that is nearing project completion, with Council approval anticipated in January 2026 (website: tularesafestreets.com). The ATP will guide the City in identifying and prioritizing active transportation improvements; establishing performance- based goals and policies; enhancing safety for people walking, rolling, and bicycling; and promoting multimodal travel for residents of all ages and abilities. The ATP also positions Tulare to be more competitive for future state and federal gr ant funding. Using current plans, policies, programs, and community initiatives, TJKM built upon Tulare’s previous progress by strengthening key pedestrian /bicycle infrastructure and advancing all- ages- and-abilities design standards. TJKM e valuated existing conditions, identified infrastructure gaps/opportunities, and proposed targeted improvements to City roadways along with potential funding sources for implementation. The ATP is guided by data-driven analysis, extensive community engagement, and modern design guidance to ensure recommendations reflect both local priorities and industry best practices. It serves as a foundational document for future updates to the General Plan and Circulation Element.
ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN, PATTERSON | 2020-2022 | $99K | TJKM Reference: Tiffany Rodriquez, Capital Projects Manager., City of Patterson, 1 Plaza Circle, Patterson, CA 95363, (209) 895 - 8075, [email protected]
TJKM prepared an ATP with a citywide process that included development of design concepts, community engagement, and improvement recommendations that responded to input from the community and implementing /overseeing agencies. ATP components included design tools for improvements, a n overall framework plan depicting the City’s future cycling and walking network , identification of pedestrian and bicycle network deficiencies and development of implementable improvement options, conceptual designs for short-term and long-term improvements suitable for future Capital Improvement Program funding programming and grant applications, and a phasing plan and grant-focused funding strategy for prioritized projects, programs, and action steps.
CITYWIDE ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN UPDATE, FRESNO | 2023-ONGOING | $400K | TJKM Reference: Jill Gormley, TE, Traffic Operations and Planning Manager, City of Fresno, 2600 Fresno Street, 4th Floor, Room 4016, Fresno, CA 93721 (559) 621-8728, [email protected] The City updated the 2017 ATP to evaluate current conditions and make strategic improvements that reflect the community’s evolving transportation needs.
Fresno’s policies continue to support opportunities for residents to lead healthier lives through safer, more extensive mul timodal networks. The City’s vision emphasizes a safe and efficient multimodal system that reduces energy dependence, fosters vibrant neighborhoods, and provides seamless regional connections. Building upon the foundation of the 2017 ATP , the 2021 General Plan, the Local Road Safety Plan, and other relevant local policies /programs, TJKM expanded on Fresno’s progress by strengthening pedestrian /bicycle infrastructure to meet all-ages-and-abilities design standards. TJKM developed strategies to enhance safety and connectivity, established a safety education program, prepared a Safe Routes to School toolbox, and created conceptual designs for priority projects. As part of the effort and in support of the Vision Zero Action Plan, TJKM also led a comprehensive public outreach program. This included a Traffic Garden event designed to engage the community particularly school age children by teaching bicycle safety, traffic rules, and the importance of proper riding gear in a fun, interactive environment.
413
UPDATE TO THE BIKEWAYS MASTER PLAN
City of Lincoln
6 UNIVERSITY AVENUE STREETSCAPE, PALO ALTO | 2022-2024 | $47K | GATES Reference: Megha Bansal, Project Manager, City of Palo Alto, 250 Hamilton Avenue, Palo Alto, CA 94301, (650) 329-2295 Gates Studio collaborated with the City of Palo Alto to develop a new streetscape concept for University Avenue that provides venues for people-centric activities and creates a vibrant and inclusive downtown corridor to enhance commercial activity. Project goals included improving pedestrian and bicycle access and traffic flow and developing a business-friendly streetscape design for this transportation corridor. As Outreach Lead and Project Landscape Architect, our team facilitated a transparent engagement process that emphasized clear communication and incorporated feedback from downtown business owners and the broader Palo Alto community into the design recommendations. Gates conducted robust virtual and in-person outreach activities in a variety of accessible formats, including online surveys, project webpage content, and public meetings and presentations. Key streetscape improvements to facilitate a community-focused destination include widened sidewalks with extended curbs at crosswalks; decorative paving on sidewalks and in key gathering spaces; relocation of utilities and stormwater improvements; new landscaping, wayfinding signage, streetlights, and traffic signals; new amenities for bicyclists and pedestrian comfort, and public art.
MEMORIAL PARK SPECIFIC PLAN, CUPERTINO | 2024 | $429K | GATES Reference: S usan Michael , CIP Manager, City of Cupertino , 10300 Torre Ave nue Cupertino, CA 95014 , (408) 777- 1328, [email protected]
Memorial Park is a 22-acre site that hosts numerous community and civic-focused events in the heart of Cupertino. It features open lawn space, an amphitheater, lighted softball field, six lighted tennis courts, three multi -use community centers, and the Cu pertino Veterans Memorial. Preceded by two park renovation projects to remove the ponds and update the amphitheater, Gates led a multidisciplinary team to develop a plan aimed at improving the site while achieving a balance between the built and natural environments.
Two rounds of community outreach were completed which informed the design process of three alternative designs into one preferred design concept that was revised in response to City Council direction and public input. The approved design keeps the above - mentioned amenities and introduces a nature and an all- abilities playground, passive garden walk, basketball and pickleball courts, and improved event spaces. The master plan additionally provided recommendations for circulation, programming, and landscaping, as well as a phasing plan with accompanying cost estimates and funding strategies specific to the City of Cupertino.
INDIVIDUAL STAFF EXPERIENCE AND PROJECT ORGANIZATION
TJKM Overview
TJKM Transportation Consultants (TJKM), founded in 1974, is a transportation planning, traffic engineering, and traffic operations firm that provides professional services locally in California, Texas, and Florida. The TJKM Team is spread out amongst seven offices with selected senior staff members that permanently reside in California. For 50 years, our clients have entrusted TJKM with their critical work.
We serve a full range of clients, including municipalities, congestion management agencies, metropolitan planning organizations , transportation agencies, private developers, other consulting firms, and attorneys. We have “hands -on” experience and understand the latest requirements, technologies, trends, and standards. Our experience with local agency processes keeps projects moving forward, and our expertise from thousands of engagements helps us complete projects within budget. Our motivation comes from satisfying clients’ objectives and improving communities.
Our goal is to provide the most cost -effective implementable solutions that meet the unique needs of each client while keeping within budget and on schedule. We are professionals with a passion for safe and sustainable transportation - fully committed to the highest client satisfaction. 414
UPDATE TO THE BIKEWAYS MASTER PLAN
City of Lincoln
7 TJKM has a strong roster of both public and private sector clients and continually builds upon this base. Our project managers, engineers, and planners have hands -on experience and understand the latest requirements, technologies, trends, and standards.
TJKM is a Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) #40772 and Small Business Enterprise (SBE) #38780.
Project Organization Chart
The proposed key individuals for the
TJKM Team are the most qualified
professionals in their respective areas of
specialization. We can confidently state
that our key staff will be fully available
for this project from beginning to end. In
addition, we hav e a vast base of highly
qualified technical members who will be
made fully available to the project as
required based on the project needs.
Key Staff Bios
Below we have identified our proposed
key team members to be assigned to this
project by listing their role, experience,
registrations, and qualifications. The
staff of TJKM and Gates Studio have the
availability and capabilities to perform
this work within the grant performance
period.
Resumes of Key Staff are provided in the Appendices.
NAYAN AMIN, TE | PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE AND QA/QC
Mr. Amin serving as your Principal-In-Charge has 35 years of both public and private sector experience in the areas of transportation planning, traffic impact studies, transportation management plans, construction scheduling, construction area signs, signing and striping, traffic signal coordination, traffic operations, transit priority, traffic signal systems, freeway and arterial management studies, and intelligent transportation systems planning, design and construction oversight.
Many of his projects seek to implement equity and resiliency by conducting thorough community impact assessments to identify and address disparities in access to transportation services; while also designing infrastructure with a focus on climate resilience, such as integrating green and sustainable features to mitigate the effects of climate change and enhance long -term infrastructure viability. This approach ensures that transportation projects not only serve diverse communities equitably but also withstand environmental challenges for the benefit of all. Integrated throughout the project is an extensive quality control and assurance regimen, led by Mr. Amin. He brings a non- biased oversight of data, assumptions, and deliverables.
COLIN BURGETT | PROJECT MANAGER
Mr. Burgett has over two decades of professional experience with expertise in multimodal transportation and integrated transportation/land use planning. He specializes in bicycle and pedestrian master plans, strategic planning for large-scale projects, including citywide transportation plans, large area plans, campus plans, environmental impact reports transportation studies, bus rapid transit corridor studies, and transit station area plans. He has extensive experience with projects that emphasize corridor revitalization, transit- oriented development, and complete streets planning. Mr. Burgett has managed bicycle and pedestrian plan updates for various local jurisdictions including Belmont, Oakland, Patterson, Pinole, San Leandro, Seaside, and Scotts Valley. Mr. Burgett manages projects that place a strong emphasis on facilitating the interactions between transportation systems, land use patterns and urban design components. 415
UPDATE TO THE BIKEWAYS MASTER PLAN
City of Lincoln
8 RUTA JARIWALA, PE, TE | PROJECT ENGINEER
Ms. Jariwala is a licensed engineer and a TJKM Principal with 25 years of experience in the areas of transportation planning, traffic operations, signal coordination, traffic signal systems, traffic impact studies/environmental impact reports, freeway and arterial management studies, and ITS planning, design, and construction oversight. She has experience in managing and successfully delivering projects to clients.
She has worked on Bicycle and Pedestrian projects in the c ities of Atherton, Belmont, Concord , Dinuba, Redwood City, San Jose, South San Francisco, Sunnyvale, and Walnut Creek. She has also led ATPs for the cities of Fresno, Scotts Valley, and Belmont.
GRISHMA PANDYA | DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS TASK LEAD Ms. Pandya joined TJKM in 2024 as an Assistant Transportation Planner. As an enthusiastic and dedicated Urban and Transportation Planner, she contributes to the development of sustainable and vibrant communities through thoughtful urban planning and effici ent transportation systems. She has a strong educational foundation and four years of experience with a desire to make a positive impact. She assists to translate complex data and concepts into compelling visuals that enhance public understanding and support informed decision-making.
REBECCA FLANEGAN, GATES STUDIO | OUTREACH COORDINATOR
Ms. Flanegan is an Outreach Coordinator with Gates Studio and an experienced public relations, engagement, and events professional focused on creatively connecting to communities. At Gates Studio, Rebecca has coordinated thoughtful and inclusive outreach programs with a variety of methods for building awareness and boosting participation including social media, focus groups, online surveys, and workshops.
Her expertise involves outlining outreach opportunities, guiding the engagement process to meet the needs of the project, and synthesizing input received into comprehensive and actionable results.
Subconsultant
Gates Studio will assist TJKM with community outreach including creation of a project website, and planning and facilitation of the Community Meeting. We anticipate their percentage of the project cost will be 10%. Gates Studio (Gates) is a women-owned, SBE-certified 27-person Landscape Architecture, Urban Design and Land Planning firm, established in 1977. Gates believes that outreach and public engagement are pivotal components of any public project to ensure that the final plan accurately and holistically represents the community and its diverse residents. In the past 44 years, their firm has partnered with numerous municipalities to facilitate public outreach for a variety of projects. They aim to facilitate a flexible and dynamic outreach process that encourages participation and considers input from a wide range of constituents and stakeholders. Their engagement efforts include digital, print, and in- person formats including banners, social media, website content, news articles, email announcements, postcards, online surveys, workshops, and webinars. All outreach conducted aims to build trust in the process, increase participation, identify community needs, and collect input to inform the plan/design.
Current Commitments
The TJKM approach delivers a management plan centered on strategic staffing, early identification of critical tasks, and the application of lessons learned from comparable projects—allowing us to remain proactive rather than reactive. Our current staff availability exceeds immediate needs, and our overall team capacity consistently surpasses monthly workload requirements. As contract demands or workloads shift, TJKM can easily allocate additional resources to address overlapping deadlines or urgent tasks, e nsuring the City’s priorities are always met. The TJKM Team’s current and projected workload confirms that we have the resources necessary to efficiently execute and complete all assignments under this contract.
Staff Commitment
The proposed key individuals for the TJKM Team are the most qualified professionals in their respective areas of specialization. We can confidently state that our key staff will be fully available for this project from beginning to end. T he TJKM Team has been carefully crafted to provide the City of Lincoln with the full range of expertise. We form an integrated team that can enhance the City’s resources, work in close cooperation with your staff, and deliver a successful Update to the Bikeways Master Plan. Our proposed team members will be made available to the City as needed for the duration of the project and will not be substituted without approval from the City. 416
Appendices
IN ASSOCIATION WITH
December 12, 2025
Proposal to Provide an Update to the
Bikeways Master Plan
417
UPDATE TO THE BIKEWAYS MASTER PLAN
City of Lincoln
A- 1
Appendix A
Key Staff Resumes
418
UPDATE TO THE BIKEWAYS MASTER PLAN
City of Lincoln
A- 2
Nayan Amin, TE | Principal-In-Charge and QA/QC
Registration: CA TE 2290
Education: M.S., Civil Engineering, San Jose State University, San Jose, CA | B.S., Civil Engineering, Saurashtra University, Rajkot, Gujarat, India
Mr. Amin has 35 years of both public and private sector experience in the areas of transportation planning, traffic impact studies, transportation management plans, construction scheduling, construction area signs, signing and striping, traffic signal coordination, traff ic operations, transit priority, traffic signal systems, freeway and arterial management studies, and ITS planning, design, and construction oversight. He specializes in macro and microscopic model development and application for analysis of impacts across all modes of transportation. His projects include planning, design, and construction oversight for ITS. Studies also include multimodal operations, light -rail, bus rapid transit, pedestrian, bicyclists and traffic safety and operations.
PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Comprehensive Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan, Belmont, CA: Project Manager that oversaw development of a comprehensive pedestrian and bicycle master plan to encourage people of all ages to bike and/or walk more. The team prepared a thorough review of existing bicycle, pedestrian, and Safe Routes to School planning documents, including the City’s Complete Streets Policy, and conducted peak hour manual counts for pedestrians and bicyclists at key intersections, as well as analyzed pedestrian and bicycle collisions to offer countermeasures. Identified and worked with representatives from community groups, schools, police and fire departments, coalitions, and adjacent agencies to gain support of the plan, and conducted public outreach via public workshops, walking/biking tours, project websites, online surveys, and other strategies.
Recommended capital projects based on existing conditions and input and assessed design policies and guidelines to maintain a natural aesthetic.
Safety Action Plan and Bike Master Plan, Monrovia, CA: Principal-In-Charge. Assisting the City of Monrovia to develop their CSAP and update the current Bicycle Master Plan. Tasks include review of existing plans, policies and programs and perform data collection and analysis for both the CSAP and Bicycle Master Plan update. Deve lop an Outreach Plan and hold Stakeholder and Community meetings, along with development of an interactive project webpages for both the CSAP and Bicycle Master Plan update. Other tasks include an equity analysis, recommendations and priority projects, implementation and programming, and a draft/final Comprehensive Safety Action Plan and updated Bicycle Master Plan.
Active Transportation Plan, Exeter, CA: QA/QC. Developed an Active Transportation Plan for the City. Tasks included: existing conditions review, identifying and updating pedestrian and bicycle projects and costs, Safe Routes to Schools projects, other non-motorized transportation modes, gathering and reviewing public input, and developing a draft and final report. TJKM also prepared a Caltrans ATP Cycle 7 project application.
Citywide Active Transportation Plan, Fresno, CA: Principal-In-Charge and QA/QC. The team is preparing an update to the City Active Transportation Plan. We will build upon the previous success that Fresno has experienced through the enforcement of these plans and policies as well as enhancement to critical pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure to adhere to all Ages and Abilities standards and objectives. The team will also develop strategies and identify opportunities to improve safety and connectivity, deve lop a safety education program, conduct community outreach including two Pop -Up demonstration projects, and develop conceptual plans for potential projects.
Active Transportation Plan, Patterson, CA: Project Manager. The team prepared a citywide bicycle and pedestrian master plan. Core components of the plan included: An overall framework plan depicting the City’s future cycling and walking network; Identification of pedestrian and bicycle network defi ciencies, and development of implementable improvement options; Design tools for improvements; Conceptual designs for short and long- term improvements suitable for future CIP funding programming and grant applications; and A phasing plan and grant-focused funding strategy for prioritized projects, programs and action steps.
Active Transportation Plan, Scotts Valley, CA: Principal-In-Charge. The team assisted Ecology Action and the City of Scotts Valley with strategic tasks focusing on successful completion and implementation of the city's active transportation plan. The plan describes current conditions, list barriers to active transportation, and recommends infrastructure and non - infrastructure solutions which promote statewide goals of reducing greenhouse gas emissions while fostering livable communities, healthy transportation, and public involvement in transportation planning. Public input was gathered through outreach events including a community meeting led by TJKM and online comments. The plan guides future improvements and secure grant funding. The planning team developed a detailed set of projects to enhance citywide mobility.
419
UPDATE TO THE BIKEWAYS MASTER PLAN
City of Lincoln
A- 3
Greater Downtown Active Transportation Plan, Stockton, CA: Principal-In-Charge. The team assisted Ecology Action and the City with strategic tasks focusing on successful completion and implementation of the City's Active Transportation Plan. The plan describes current conditions, list barriers to active transportation, and recommends infrastructure and non - infrastructure solutions which promote statewide goals of reducing greenhouse gas emissions while fostering livable communities, healthy transportation, and public involvement in transportation planning. Public input was gathered through outreach events including a community meeting led by us and online comments. The plan guides future improvements and secure grant funding. The planning team developed a detailed set of projects to enhance citywide mobility.
Pedestrian and Bicyclist Safety and Connectivity Study, Dinuba, CA: Project Manager oversaw the planning services to complete the Dinuba Pedestrian and Bicyclist Safety and Connectivity Study. The team conducted an assessment of existing conditions; reviewed existing multimodal transportation infrastructure and connectivity for gaps and deficiencies, as well as barriers to safe routes to school; and examined crash data available from SWITRS and the Dinuba Police Department and developed countermeasures that enhance safety and mobility for all travel modes. Extensive public participation included a walking/bicycling tour and online survey. The project also involved the development of a neighborhood traffic calming program and a complete streets policy.
Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program and Complete Streets Policy, Dinuba, CA: Project Manager responsible for assisting the City with the development of their first Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program and Complete Streets Policy. The Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program provides a well -defined toolbox to effectively utilize the most appropriate traffic calming solutions with proper community outreach and collaboration. Key tasks of this plan were: Development of a Traffic Calming Toolbox; Policies and guidelines for application of each strategy in the toolbox; Develop necessary forms and educational documents to establish community support; and Traffic calming involves strategies and physical measures to reduce vehicular speeds and cut -through traffic, thus improving safety for all travel modes. In addition, he developed a Complete Streets Policy to assist long- term citywide multimodal planning and decision making. Recommended a joint outreach effort for the Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program and Complete Streets Policy, along with the ongoing Pedestrian and Bicyclist Safety and Connectivity Study.
Eureka North-South Multimodal Corridor Plan, Eureka, CA: Project Manager who assisted the City of Eureka to develop a Multimodal Corridor Plan focusing on the 1.5-mile corridors of H and I Streets. With the growing and higher collision rates on H and I Streets. Located “hot spots” as identifying measures to cal m traffic and reinforce right of way for all modes of transportation. The team partnered with a City -certified local outreach agency to streamline the community engagement process. An informational workshop, a stakeholders meeting, and a walking/biking tour which were held and all well-received.
Residents and other community members were able to review and comment on the proposed concept alternatives before the final plan was completed.
Hudson Bike and Pedestrian Improvements, Redwood City, CA: Principal-In-Charge of project that recommended improvements to the only truly continuous north-south roadway through Redwood City, west of El Camino Real, which was seen as a potentially desirable route for bicyclists and pedestrians even though it attracts relatively high vehicle traffic volumes. The team addressed design constraints by developing improvements, such as traffic circles, curb bulb-outs, raised islands, landscaping, and peak hour bicycle lanes, which provided an optimal balance among roadway width for bicyclists, reduced crossing distance for pedestrians, and allowing safe accommodation of vehicle traffic. Rapid rectangular flashing beacon signs and traffic signal modifications along the corridor, and pedestrian push button and bicycle detection, were also designed as part of the project. The team prepared exhibits and conducted two public workshops to receive input from the surrounding neighborhoods on the concepts developed. The team refined alternatives and prepared detailed design plans of the pedestrian and bicycle improvements.
420
UPDATE TO THE BIKEWAYS MASTER PLAN
City of Lincoln
A- 4
Colin Burgett | Project Manager
Registration: N/A
Education: M.C.R.P, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA | B.S., Political Science, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR
Mr. Burgett has over two decades of professional experience with expertise in multimodal transportation and integrated transportation/land use planning. He specializes in strategic planning for large-scale projects, including citywide transportation plans, large area plans, campus plans, bicycle and pedestrian master plans, EIR transportation studies, bus rapid transit corridor studies, and transit station area plans. He has extensive experience with projects that emphasize corridor revitalization, transit-oriented development, and complete streets planning. Mr. Burgett manages projects that place a strong emphasis on facilitating the interactions between transportation systems, land use patterns and urban design components.
PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Active Transportation Plan, Pinole, CA: Project Manager for a citywide active transportation plan process that included community engagement, development of design concepts and improvement recommendations . Core components of the plan included the Identification of pedestrian and bicycle network deficiencies and implementable improvement options.
Developed conceptual designs for short-term and long-term improvements suitable for future Capital Improvement Program funding programming and grant applications.
Citywide Active Transportation Plan, Patterson, CA: Project Manager for a citywide active transportation plan process that included community engagement, development of design concepts and improvement recommendations. Core components of the plan included the Identification of pedestrian and bicycle network deficiencies and implementable improvement options. Developed conceptual designs for short-term and long-term improvements suitable for future Capital Improvement Program funding programming and grant applications.
Active Transportation Plan, Scotts Valley, CA: Deputy Project Manager and Task Lead, r eviewed existing conditions and developed improvement options and concept designs. Conducted community outreach, facilitated workshop discussions to gather input on key needs, and presented improvement options to community members.
Pedestrian and Bicyclist Safety and Connectivity Study and Complete Streets Policy, Dinuba, CA: Task Lead, provided design input for proposed citywide bicycle and pedestrian network improvements. Developed a complete streets policy document that included recommended changes to the city’s street design guidelines to allow for cost -effective complete street improvements.
Comprehensive Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan, Belmont, CA: Task Lead for a comprehensive pedestrian and bicycle master plan, and the first such plan developed by the City of Belmont. Reviewed existing conditions and collision analysis.
Prepared a comprehensive needs assessment, incorporating public input as well as existing conditions findings, that informed network development and generated additional support for the citywide planning effort. Developed citywide bikeway network and pedestrian priority improvement recommendations. Worked with Team on cost estimates. Worked closely with City staff and technical advisory committee and led walking tour. Prepared a strategic implementation plan and CIP list with recommended phasing.
Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, San Leandro, CA: Project Manager for a comprehensive bicycle and pedestrian master plan. Key tasks included updates to the recommended bikeway network and incorporation of a pedestrian component.
Pedestrian and bicycle improvement options were developed for high-priority and “hot-spot” locations.
Bascom Corridor Complete Streets Study, Santa Clara County, CA: Task Leader that assessed existing multi-modal conditions and safety, developing complete streets design and multimodal operational solutions. VTA bus routes 61 and 62 serve the corridor. The study includes evaluation of transit travel times and transit access.
Safe Routes to Downtown, Los Altos, CA: Principal- in-Charge who oversaw study focused on enhancing connections to Downtown Los Altos for pedestrians and bicyclists across Foothill Expressway. The study investigated potential surface access improvements across Foothill Expressway at its intersections with Main Street and with West Edith Avenue. The Safe Routes to Downtown study developed several conceptual design alternatives to improve pedestrian crossings by redesigning the right-turn slip lanes, while also providing bicycle lanes for cyclists traveling on the expressway. The study also demonstrated that the proposed pedestrian and bicycle enhancements could be introduced without resulting in vehicle queueing or 421
UPDATE TO THE BIKEWAYS MASTER PLAN
City of Lincoln
A- 5
significant delay to motorists. A key secondary benefit of improving pedestrian and bicycle access to and from adjacent neighborhoods was a potential reduction in Downtown parking demand.
Bicycle Master Plan, Oakland, CA: Principal author and Lead Planner of the City of Oakland’s first Bicycle Master Plan. Worked closely with the City’s Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee, developed the plan components including bikeway network map, and led the plan through public review and adoption.
South Richmond Transportation Connectivity Plan, Richmond, CA: Provided transportation engineering input into the development of multimodal improvement options including, street cross -sections incorporating bicycle lanes, pedestrian improvements, and transit-only lanes; and conceptual design options for a proposed bicycle/pedestrian/transit bridge across Interstate 580. The Connectivity Plan contained specific recommendations to improve multimodal connectivity between Richmond’s Southern Shoreline and Central Richmond neighborhoods as well as adjacent communities including El Cerrito, Albany, and Berkeley.
Rohnerville Airport Access Study, Humboldt County, CA: Project Manager for the transportation planning portions of study undertaken by the Humboldt County Association of Governments to assess opportunities to improve access to and from the Rohnerville Airport. Access options were aimed at primarily improving access from US Highway 101 including consideration of route options that would connect US Highway 101 with the airport via Highway 36. Developed eight options for improving access to the airport, including options that would complement other planned improvements in the area.
Central Avenue Complete Streets, Albuquerque, NM: Principal-in-Charge who oversaw the transportation components of a community planning effort that focused on multimodal improvement options to enhance mobility on a two -mile study corridor between Downtown Albuquerque and the Nob Hill district. Key tasks included the development of segment-specific cross-section recommendations to provide lane configuration options, to accommodate bicycle and transit lanes, on-street parking, and widened sidewalks. The proje ct included stakeholder meetings, a community workshop, and a two -day charrette.
Mission Chavez Streetscape Plan, San Francisco, CA: Project Manager for the traffic operational components of a multimodal improvement plan developed as part of an area -wide streetscape plan. The Streetscape Plan identified changes to lane configurations on two key corridors, Folsom Street and South Van Ness Avenue, to accommodate enhanced bicycle circulation. Assessed the potential effect of proposed bicycle improvement options on motor vehicle traffic, which demonstrated that a proposed “four to three” road diet, to allow for the installation of bicycle lanes on Folsom Street, could be accommodated without significantly impacting traffic circulation.
Ocean Beach Master Plan, San Francisco, CA: Transportation Planner for the development of multimodal improvement options on the Great Highway corridor that provides access to San Francisco’s Ocean Beach, including segments of Sloat Boulevard and Skyline Boulevard. The plan was undertaken by SPUR to develop a climate adaption and open space plan to address many key issues at Ocean Beach. A key element of the plan included potential changes to Great Highway given on- going erosion, including reducing the number of travel lanes and closing one segment by rerouting motor vehicle traffic onto Sloat Boulevard and Skyline Boulevard, while maintaining public access to the beach. Given the proposed rerouting, key tasks focused on multimodal improvement options on Sloat Boulevard including, a significant reduction in the curb-to-curb width to provide shorter pedestrian crossings, the provision of parking, and the development of two potential roundabout configurations to maintain efficient travel flow at two key intersections. 422
UPDATE TO THE BIKEWAYS MASTER PLAN
City of Lincoln
A- 6
Ruta Jariwala, PE, TE | Community Meeting Task Lead
Registration: CA CE 73840 | CA TE 2465 | TX CE 135281 | FL CE 100796 Education: M.S., Civil Engineering, San Jose State University, San Jose, CA | B.S., Civil Engineering, Bombay University, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
Ms. Jariwala has 2 5 years of professional experience in the areas of traffic operations, transportation planning, freeway and arterial management studies, signal coordination, traffic signal systems, traffic impact studies/environmental impact reports and ITS planning, design, and construction oversight. She has extensive experience in macro and microscopic model development and application for analysis of traffic operations for express lane studies as well as multimodal operations, pedestrian, bicyclists, and traffic safety studies.
PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Comprehensive Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan, Belmont, CA : Task Leader involved in developing a comprehensive pedestrian and bicycle master plan to encourage people of all ages to bike or walk more. She prepared a thorough review of existing bicycle, pedestrian, and Safe Routes to School planning documents, condu cted peak hour manual counts for pedestrians and bicyclists at key intersections, as well as analyzed pedestrian and bicycle collisions to offer countermeasures.
She also identified and worked with representatives from community groups, schools, police and fire departments, coalitions, and adjacent agencies to gain support of the plan and conducted public outreach.
Safety Action Plan and Bike Master Plan, Monrovia, CA: QA/QC. Assisting the City of Monrovia to develop their CSAP and update the current Bicycle Master Plan. Tasks include review of existing plans, policies and programs and perform data collection and analysis for both the CSAP and Bicycle Master Plan update. Develop an Outreach Plan and hold Stakeholder and Community meetings, along with development of an interactive project webpages for both the CSAP and Bicycle Master Plan update. Other tasks include an equity analysis, recommendations and priority projects, implementation and programming, and a draft/final Comprehensive Safety Action Plan and updated Bicycle Master Plan.
Active Transportation Plan, Exeter, CA: Principal-In-Charge overseeing the team that is assisting the City to develop an Active Transportation Plan for the City of Exeter. Using the existing Complete Streets with ADA Compliance and Active Transportation Safety Enhancement Plan, Tasks include existing conditions review, identifying and updating pedestrian and bicycle projects and costs, Safe Routes to Schools projects, other non-motorized transportation modes, gather and review public input, and develop a draft and final report.
Citywide Active Transportation Plan, Fresno, CA : Project Manager. The team is preparing an update to the City Active Transportation Plan. We will build upon the previous success that Fresno has experienced through the enforcement of these plans and policies as well as enhancement to critical pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure to adhere to all Ages and Abilities standards and objectives. The team will also develop strategies and identify opportunities to improve safety and connectivity, develop a safety e ducation program, conduct community outreach including two Pop -Up demonstration projects, and develop conceptual plans for potential projects.
Active Transportation Plan, Patterson, CA: Principal-In-Charge. The team prepared a citywide bicycle and pedestrian master plan. Core components of the plan included: An overall framework plan depicting the City’s future cycling and walking network; Identification of pedestrian and bicycle network deficiencies, and development of implementable improvement options; Design tools for improvements; Conceptual designs for short and long- term improvements suitable for future CIP funding programming and grant applications; and A phasing plan and grant-focused funding strategy for prioritized projects, programs and action steps.
Active Transportation Plan, Scotts Valley, CA: Project Manager. The team assisted Ecology Action and the City of Scotts Valley with strategic tasks focusing on successful completion and implementation of the City's active transportation plan. The plan describes current conditions, list barriers to acti ve transportation, and recommends infrastructure and non -infrastructure solutions which promote statewide goals of reducing greenhouse gas emissions while fostering livable communities, healthy transportation, and public involvement in transportation planning. Public input was gathered through outreach events including a community meeting led by TJKM and online comments. The plan guides future improvements and secure grant funding. The planning team developed a detailed set of projects to enhance citywide mobility.
Pedestrian and Bicyclist Safety and Connectivity Study, Dinuba, CA: Task Lead. She provided planning services to complete the Dinuba Pedestrian and Bicyclist Safety and Connectivity Study. She conducted an assessment of existing conditions; reviewed existing multimodal transportation infrastructure and connectivity for gaps and deficiencies, as well as barriers to safe routes to school; and examined crash data available from SWITRS and the Dinuba Police Department and developed 423
UPDATE TO THE BIKEWAYS MASTER PLAN
City of Lincoln
A- 7
countermeasures that enhance safety and mobility for all travel modes. Extensive public participation was provided, including a walking/bicycling tour and an online survey. The project also involved the development of a neighborhood traffic calming program and a complete streets policy.
Greater Downtown Active Transportation Plan, Stockton, CA: Task Lead. Retained to perform professional services for Existing Conditions Traffic Analysis for the City of Stockton Greater Downtown Active Transportation Plan. Twelve study intersections were selected for the project within the study area. As part of the project, evaluated under existing conditions 12 study intersections during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak periods. TJKM collected relevant data such as traffic volume and existing travel demand model data, details on newly constructed transportation improvements, and data on proposed development and transportation projects as it relates to this project. Attended monthly PDT meetings with City of Stockton staff members and project stakeholders as well as project workshops.
Castro Street Bike Lane Feasibility Study, Mountain View, CA: Principal- In-Charge. Assisted with the feasibility study in assessing options for improving bicycle accommodations along Castro Street between El Camino Real to California Street within Downtown Mountain View. The Study included review of existing roadway network, multi-modal analysis, including Level of Traffic Stress, parking analysis, community engagement, and development and evaluation of alternatives. Based on the alternative evaluation, TJKM recommended a most feasible alternative for short term as well as for long term which can be implemented along Castro Street study corridor.
Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program (NTCP) and Complete Streets Policy, Dinuba, CA: Task Lead responsible for assisting the City with the development of their first NTCP and Complete Streets Policy. The NTCP provides a well-defined toolbox to effectively utilize the most appropriate traffic calming solutions with proper community outreach and collaboration. Key tasks included: Development of a Traffic Calming Toolbox; Policies and guidelines for application of each strategy in the toolbox; Develop necessary forms and educational documents to establish community support; and Traffic calming involves strategies and physical measures to reduce vehicular speeds and cut-through traffic, thus improving safety for all travel modes. In addition, he developed a Complete Streets Policy to assist long-term citywide multimodal planning and decision making. Recommended a joint outreach effort for the NTCP and Complete Streets Policy, along with the ongoing Pedestrian and Bicyclist Safety and Connectivity Study.
Leigh High School Safety Analysis, San Jose, CA: Project Manager responsible for evaluation of existing conditions, identifying deficiencies, and providing recommendations to enhance operations and safety for vehicular, pedestrian, bicycle, and transit in the immediate vicinity of Leigh High School in the city of San Jose. The school experienced operations and safety issues which posed risks to students and staff. The safety study identified existing volumes and traffic patterns for vehicle, pedestrian and bicycle movements, student pick-up and drop-off areas, bus operations, on-site circulation, and speed data in the vicinity of the school.
Eureka North-South Multimodal Corridor Study, Eureka, CA: Task Lead assisted the City of Eureka to develop a Multimodal Corridor Plan focusing on the 1.5 -mile corridors of H and I Streets. With the growing and higher collision rates on H and I Streets, she identified measures to calm traffic and reinforce right of way for all modes of transportation. The team partnered with a City -certified local outreach agency to streamline the community engagement process. We have completed an informational workshop, a stakeholders meeting, and a walking/biking tour which were all well-received. Residents and other community members were able to review and comment on the proposed concept alternatives before the final plan was complete.
Bascom Corridor Complete Streets Study, Santa Clara County, CA: Project Manager responsible for assisting VTA and its member agencies, including Cities of San Jose and Campbell, and the County of Santa Clara, to transform a portion of Bascom Avenue into high-quality, multimodal street that prioritize bicycle, pedestrian and transit travel while maintaining capacity for motorists. Responsibilities include transportation planning, outreach, and design, to traffic analysis. The team has conducted a planning co ntext review, existing conditions and needs assessment and has also completed preliminary intersection concept drawings to accommodate multimodal facilities and to evaluate vehicular traffic impact attributed to road diet and complete streets strategies. T he team is currently in the process of developing concept alternatives by incorporating public input and traffic analysis of various scenarios to ensure final concepts are determined with thorough considerations. Through a collaboration effort with the gen eral public, local and regional governments, the project is expected to benefit significantly to all travel mode users, and the growing local economic of member jurisdictions.
Bike Safety Study, Atherton, CA: Task Leader on project which evaluated lengths of intermittent bicycle lanes, installation of alternating bicycle lanes to provide a safe space for vehicles to pass cyclists, the need for bike turnout areas and potentia l turn lane restrictions to enhance bicyclist safety.
424
UPDATE TO THE BIKEWAYS MASTER PLAN
City of Lincoln
A- 8
Grishma Pandya | Data Collection and Analysis Task Lead Registration: N/A
Education: B. Architecture, Mumbai University, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India | M.S. Urban & Regional Planning, San Jose State University, CA
Ms. Pandya joined TJKM in 2024 as an Assistant Transportation Planner. As an enthusiastic and dedicated Urban and Transportation Planner, she contributes to the development of sustainable and vibrant communities through thoughtful urban planning and efficient transportation systems.
She has a strong educational foundation and four years of experience with a desire to make a positive impact. She assists to translate complex data and concepts into compelling visuals that enhance public understanding and support informed decision-making.
PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Safety Action Plan and Bike Master Plan, Monrovia, CA: Support Staff. to develop the CSAP and update the current Bicycle Master Plan. Tasks include review of existing plans, policies and programs and perform data collection and analysis for both the CSAP and Bicycle Master Plan update. Other tasks include an equity analysis, recommendations and priority projects, implementation and programming, and a draft/final Comprehensive Safety Action Plan and updated Bicycle Master Plan.
Active Transportation Plan, Fresno, CA: Assistant Transportation Planner. Preparing the Geographic Information System base maps for the City’s Active Transportation Plan.
Update/Expand Local Road Safety Plan, Mendocino County, CA: Assistant Transportation Planner. Assisting with preparing presentation and documents for the Mendocino Council of Governments to check the Safe Streets and Roads for All grant eligibility criteria. Providing Mendocino Council of Governments with all the necessary recommendations for grant writing.
Assisting in preparing the updates to the Local Road Safety Plan.
Safe Routes to School Reports, cities of for Los Osos, Napa, and Santa Cruz, CA: Intern. Performed the Safe Routes to School report writing activities for the Cities of Los Osos, Napa, and Santa Cruz safety projects.
School Site Traffic Circulation Analysis, Castro Valley, CA: Assistant Transportation Planner. Performed Field Observations and report writing for eight schools within Castro Valley School District.
Traffic Calming Guidelines, Westcliff, CA: Intern. Assisted in recommending traffic Calming guidelines to the City of Westcliff.
Preparing presentations and comparing thresholds with various cities to provide appropriate recommendations.
Safe Streets and Roads for All Grant Writing, Los Gatos, CA : Intern. Assisted with grant writing and data collection and preparation of Geographic Information System Maps.
Safe Streets and Roads for All Grant Writing, Implementation Grant , Livermore, CA: Assistant Transportation Planner.
Assisted with preparing a grant writing package on behalf of City of Livermore. Performed data collection, writing narrative, generating maps, figure, and filling out forms.
Strengthening Mobility and Revolutionizing Transportation (SMART) Concord, CA: Assistant Transportation Planner.
Assisting with preparing a grant writing package on behalf of the City of Concord. Data Collection, and Writing Narrative HSIP Grant Writing, G lendale, CA: Assistant Transportation Planner. Assisting with preparing a grant writing package on behalf of the City of Glendale. Data Collection, Writing Narrative, Collision Diagrams and Filling out forms.
HSIP Grant Writing, Pico Rivera, CA: Assistant Transportation Planner. Assisting with preparing a grant writing package on behalf of the City of Pico Rivera. Data Collection, Writing Narrative, Collision Diagrams and Filling out forms.
425
UPDATE TO THE BIKEWAYS MASTER PLAN
City of Lincoln
A- 9
Rebecca Flanegan | Gates Studio Community Meeting Lead
Registration: N/A
Education: B.A., Anthropology/Humanistic Studies John Hopkins University, 1996 Ms. Flanegan is an experienced public relations, engagement, and events professional focused on creatively connecting to communities. At Gates Studio, Rebecca has coordinated thoughtful and inclusive outreach programs with a variety of methods for building awareness and boos ting participation including social media, focus groups, online surveys, and workshops. Her expertise involves outlining outreach opportunities, guiding the engagement process to meet the needs of the project, and synthesizing input received into comprehensive and actionable results.
PROJECT EXPERIENCE
University Avenue Streetscape, Palo Alto, CA : Outreach Coordinator. Gates Studio worked with the City of Palo Alto to develop a conceptual streetscape plan for University Avenue that supports people -focused activity and creates a vibrant, inclusive downtown corridor . Project goals were to improving pedestrian and bicycle access and traffic flow and developing a business-friendly streetscape. Led a transparent engagement process—through online surveys, project webpage content, and virtual and in-person meetings—to gather input from downtown businesses and the broader community. Key proposed improvements include widened sidewalks with curb extensions, decorative paving in key gathering areas, utility relocations and stormwater upgrades, new landscaping, wayfinding signage, streetlights, traffic signals, bicycle amenities, pedestrian- comfort features, and public art.
Memorial Park Specific Plan, Cupertino, CA: Outreach Coordinator. Preceded by two park renovation projects to remove the ponds and update the amphitheater, Gates led a multidisciplinary team to develop a plan for the 22-acre community park, aimed at improving the site while achieving a balance between the built and natural environments. Led two rounds of community outreach which informed the design process of three alternative designs into one preferred design concept that was revised in response to City Council direction and public input. The approved design keeps the above-mentioned amenities and introduces a nature and an all-abilities playground, passive garden walk, basketball and pickleball courts, and improved event spaces. The master plan additionally provided recommendations for circulation, programming, and landscaping, as well as a phasing plan with accompanying cost estimates and funding strategies specific to the City of Cupertino.
Reviving the Heart of Pittsburg Pride (Railroad Ave Beautification), Pittsburg, CA : Outreach Coordinator. As prime consultant, Gates is working with the City of Pittsburg to enhance Railroad Avenue with landscape improvements and pedestrian-friendly spaces across six sites. The project builds on the 2009 Specific Plan and includes median landscaping, signage, a new urban park, and an arching gateway monument. Facilitated community outreach that included an online survey, in-person pop-ups, and print and web materials to gather feedback and raise awareness. Contracted with the City to provide conceptual design, design development, construction documents, permitting support, and construction administration.
Parks Master Plan, San Carlos, CA: Outreach Coordinator. Currently collaborating with the City of San Carlos to develop an updated Parks Master Plan that aims to improve City’s parks, open spaces, and recreation facilities and programs for the next 20 years. It addresses the existing system for the current residents as well as the needs of the growing community in the future. Planned 2 rounds of robust community outreach that reached over 2,000 residents through pop-up events, community workshops, and online surveys the provided feedback on the needs, wants, and preferences of the public.
Pescadero Community Space, Pescadero, CA: Outreach Coordinator. Gates partnered with San Mateo County to transform an undeveloped downtown Pescadero lot into a welcoming community space. The team is leading site analysis, CEQA compliance, community engagement, and schematic design to create a plan that reflects local culture, supports sustainability, and addresses the site’s FEMA floodplain conditions. Planned and facilitated engagement efforts—including pop-up events, surveys, and stakeholder meetings—shaped a pedestrian-friendly, nature-based concept with shaded seating, gathering areas, nature play, restrooms, and walking paths.
426
UPDATE TO THE BIKEWAYS MASTER PLAN
City of Lincoln
B- 1
Appendix B
Project Descriptions
427
UPDATE TO THE BIKEWAYS MASTER PLAN
City of Lincoln
B- 2
Active Transportation Plan, Pinole | 2023-2025
Reference: Kapil Amin, Sustainability Project Manager, City of Pinole, (510) 372-0989, [email protected] The City of Pinole Active Transportation Plan was developed in order to foster a robust and safe active transportation network. The intent is to bolster a healthier community by providing cleaner air and health benefits that come with walking, biking, and scooting.
Colin Burgett (while at another firm) led extensive community engagement as part of this effort. Community engagement included a project website, pop -up events, community engagement committee meetings and a community workshop to shape the Plan, under the campaign Walk and Roll Pinole.
Future improvement concepts that incorporate an active transportation network for different streets in Pinole were made available for the public to review and indicate their preferences.
428
UPDATE TO THE BIKEWAYS MASTER PLAN
City of Lincoln
B- 3
Pedestrian and Bicyclist Safety and Connectivity Study, Dinuba | 2018-2019 Reference: Ismael Hernandez, Public Works Operations Director, City of Madera (Formerly City of Dinuba), (559) 661-5466, [email protected]
The City of Dinuba selected TJKM to provide planning and engineering services to complete the Dinuba Pedestrian and Bicyclist Safety and Connectivity Study. The project objective of the project was to conduct a comprehensive analysis of safety concerns, travel patterns, and infrastructure to improve walking and bicycling for its residents. TJKM conducted an assessment of existing conditions by obtaining and reviewing relevant existing data, studies, and reports related to active transportation policies and guidance; reviewed existing transportation i nfrastructure and connectivity for gaps and deficiencies, as well as barriers to safe routes to school; and examined data available from SWITRS and the Dinuba Police Department.
Extensive public participation was conducted through the hosting of Stakeholder Advisory Group meetings, community meetings, City Council meetings, development of an interactive project website to engage the community to submit ideas, concerns, priorities, and desired facility and streetscape elements. A walking/bicycling tour was conducted as part of public outreach process.
TJKM developed a Needs and Demand Analysis, which assessed needs for enhancement, mobility, and safety for all modes of transportation. The assessment addressed: 1) the physical attributes of existing facilities; 2) the potential for vehicle trip reductions and air quality benefits; 3) potential for increased walking and bicycle usage; and 4) the needs of all users of the corridor. The assessment also identified opportunities for improvement for all modes of transportation, identify gaps and deficiencies within the existing system, and suggested locations where improvements should be prioritized. The project also involved the development of a neighborhood traffic calming program and a complete streets policy.
Based on the work completed for the project, the City of Dinuba applied for funding under the Caltrans HSIP and received $1.6M funds to implement the recommendations. In addition, based on the work completed under this project; and Local Road Safety Plan, Neighborhood Traffic Management Plan and Complete Streets Plan, TJKM assisted the City of apply for ATP grant and was successful to receive $18 M.
429
UPDATE TO THE BIKEWAYS MASTER PLAN
City of Lincoln
B- 4
Active Transportation Plan, Exeter | 2023-2024
Reference: Eddie Wendt, Project Manager, City of Exeter, (559) 804-9988, [email protected]
TJKM assisted City of Exeter to develop an Active Transportation Plan to enhance walking and bicycling within the City of Exeter. As a guiding framework, the Active Transportation Plan aimed to foster safer, more accessible, and enjoyable streets and bikew ays, particularly benefiting those who rely on non-motorized transportation for daily commuting. The Active Transportation Plan outlined key recommendations to bolster and encourage bicycling and walking while improving the infrastructure to support the City’s growing population. The Active Transportation Plan also provided a thorough inventory of existing bike and pedestrian infrastructure, identifying areas for improvement, prioritizing enhancements, and outlines sources to secure funding for implementation using the existing Complete Streets with ADA Compliance and Active Transportation Safety Enhancement Plan. Exeter’s Active Transportation Plan was also guided by an Equity Framework that focuses on addressing the needs of the City’s most vulnerable use r groups, including low -income families, children, elderly residents, people with disabilities, and those without access to cars. The Active Transportation Plan sets forth a vision for a connected and complete pedestrian and bicycle network that provides optimal mobility, safety, and accessibility for all residents, regardless of age or ability. This network is designed to be maintainable, scalable, and seamlessly integrated into the lifestyles of Exeter’s residents.
As part of the project scope, TJKM also prepared a Caltrans Active Transportation Program Cycle 7 project application that was submitted in June 2024 for consideration. The Final Report was reviewed by the Council on August 27, 2024, and was adopted by Exeter City Council in September 2024.
430
UPDATE TO THE BIKEWAYS MASTER PLAN
City of Lincoln
C
Appendix C
Form
431
Levine Act Disclosure Statement
(The completed form submitted to the City of Lincoln is a public record.) California Government Code Section 84308 (the "Levine Act") prohibits any officer of the City of Lincoln (defined as an elected or appointed officer, alternate, and any candidate for elected office) from participating in any consideration or action related to a proceeding if they receive political contribution(s) from a party or its agent(s) totaling more than $250 within t he previous 12 months, while a proceeding is pending, and for 12 months following the date of a final decision in a proceeding concerning a license, permit, other entitlement for use, franchise, or contract (collectively, “proposal or application”).
City officers are listed here:
• Members of the City Council: https://www.lincolnca.gov/CityCouncil • Boards and Commission Members: https://www.lincolnca.gov/BCC
Parties and their agent(s) are responsible for reviewing and disclosing their applicable contributions to City officers on the record of a proceeding.
1. Have you or your entity, or any agent on behalf of you or your entity, made any political contributions totaling more than $250 to any City officer in the 12 months preceding the date of the submission of your proposal or application, or the anticipated date of any action of a n y C i t y C ou n c i l , B oa r d or C om m i s s i on c on s i d e r a ti on or a c ti on r e l a t e d t o t h i s proposal or application?
YES If yes, please identify the City officer(s):
NO
2. Do you or your entity, or any agen t on behalf of you or your company, anticipate or plan to make any political contribution(s) of more than $250 to any City officer in the 12 months following any City Council, Board or Commission consideration or action related to this proposal or application? YES If yes, please identify the City officer(s):
NO
Answering ‘yes’ to either of the two questions above does not preclude the City of Lincoln from considering or taking action on a proposal or application. It does, however, potentially preclude the identified officer(s) from participating in consideration of and taking any action related to the proposal or application.
I declare under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of California the foregoing information is true and correct.
Dated: Name of entity:
By:
(signature)
(print name and title)
You must submit a supplemental form if you make any new reportable contribution(s) while the proposal or application is being considered and is pending. If this form has not been previously submitted in connection with a contracting, licensing, entitlement or permitting process, please provide the completed form to the Office of the City Clerk for appropriate departmental routing at: City Clerk, City Hall, 600 6 th Street, Lincoln, CA 95648, [email protected].
12/8/2025
T J K M
Nayan Amin, President
432
Levine Act Table of Terms and Legal Authority
Term Definition Legal Citation
Covered
“proceedings”
A proceeding to grant, deny, revoke, restrict, or modify a license, permit or other entitlement for use, that does not solely involve purpose ministerial decisions and is:
(1) Applied for by the party;
(2) Formally or informally requested by the party; or
(3) A contract between the agency and the party or a franchise granted by the agency to the party, other than a contract that is competitively bid, a labor contract. or a personal employment contract. (Emphasis added.)
FPPC Reg 18438.2(a)
Party
Any person who files an application for, or is the subject of, a proceeding involving a license, permit, or other entitlement for use.
Gov. Code § 84308(a)(1)
Participant
Any person who is not a party but who actively supports or opposes a particular decision in a proceeding involving a license, permit, or other entitlement for use and who has a financial interest in the decision. A person actively supports or opposes a particular decision in a proceeding if that person lobbies in person the officers or employees of the agency, testifies in person before the agency, or otherwise acts to influence officers of the agency.
Gov. Code § 84308(a)(2)
FPPC Reg. 18438.4
Agent
A person who represents a party or participant for
compensation and appears before or otherwise communicates with the governmental agency for the purposes of influencing the pending proceedings. See FPPC Reg. 18438.3 for exceptions for certain consultants.
FPPC Reg. 18438.3
Competitively Bid
A contract required by law to be awarded to the lowest
responsible bidder with a responsive bid, or, if the successful bidder refuses or fails to execute the contract, to the next lowest bidder with a responsive bid.
FPPC Reg.
18438.2(a)(3)(A)
Labor Contract
A contract or agreement reached through collective bargaining or with a representative group regarding the salary, benefits, or terms and conditions under an employment or retirement
policy for employees or retirees, include a project labor agreement entered under Public Contract Code § 2500.
FPPC Reg.
18438.2(a)(3)(B)
Personal Employment
Contract
A contract for employment, including the terms and conditions of employment, between the agency and an agency employee.
A contract with an independent contractor is NOT a personal employment contract.
FPPC Reg.
18438.2(a)(3)(C)-(D)
A party to a proceeding before an agency involving a license, permit, or other entitlement for use shall disclose on the record of the proceeding any contribution in an amount of more than two hundred fifty dollars ($250) made within the preceding 12 months by the party or the party’s agent.
A party, or agent to a party, to a proceeding involving a license, permit, or other entitlement for use pending before any agency or a participant, or agent to a participant, in the proceeding shall not make a contribution of more than two hundred fifty dollars ($250) to any officer of that agency during the proceeding and for 12 months following the date of a final decision is rendered by the agency in the proceeding. (Gov. Code § 84308, emphasis added.)
433
CALIFORNIA | FLORIDA | TEXAS
Corporate Office 4305 Hacienda Drive, Suite 550, Pleasanton, CA 94588 925.463.0611 | www.TJKM.com
TJKM
434
SUBJECT:
Adopt a Resolution Approving the Recognized Obligation
Payment Schedule (ROPS) Pursuant to Health and Safety
Code Section 34177(I) for the Period of July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2027. (Nita Wracker)
SUBMITTED BY:
Nita Wracker
DEPARTMENT:
Finance
DATE:
January 13, 2026
Item Number 11.H
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the City Council adopt a resolution approving the annual Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS) for the period of July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2027.
BACKGROUND/INTRODUCTION:
As the Successor Agency to the dissolved City of Lincoln Redevelopment Agency, the City is required pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34177(I) to submit an annual Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS) to the Consolidated Oversight Board at the County of Placer for approval, and then to the State of California Department of Finance for final approval.
Once the Successor Agency receives final approval from the oversight board and the State, the RDA Successor Agency will receive funds from the County to pay the existing debts and obligations listed in the ROPS.
FINDINGS/ANALYSIS:
Submission of the annual
Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS) for the period of July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2027 is required by the Department of Finance.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
This Resolution is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), as codified at Public
Resources Code
§§ 21000,
et seq
., and as further governed by 14
California Code of Regulations
§§
15000,
et seq
., because it is not a project as contemplated by 14 C.C.R. § 15378. Even if this Resolution were subject to CEQA, the City Council finds this Resolution exempt from the requirements of CEQA pursuant to 14 C.C.R. § 15061(b)(3), because there is no possibility it will have a significant effect on the environment.
LEVINE ACT COMPLIANCE:
The Levine Act requires a party (or the party’s agent(s)) to a proceeding before the City of Lincoln that
STAFF REPORT
435
The Levine Act requires a party (or the party’s agent(s)) to a proceeding before the City of Lincoln that involves any action or consideration to their contract, license, permit, or other entitlement for use, to disclose any campaign contribution made to City elected or appointed officer totaling more than $500 within the 12 months before the City decision.
This matter does not implicate the disclosure requirements of the Levine Act.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The City of Lincoln Successor Agency is required to prepare and submit to the Placer County Consolidated Oversight Board its Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule for the twelve-month period of July 1, 2026 to June 30, 2027 for approval prior to the required submission to the Department of Finance by February 1
st
of each year.
The request totals $1,211,268 including $741,028 in other funds and $470,240 in RPTTF as follows:
1 .
Bond Payments $756,331- per debt schedule.
2 .
Bond Reserve $125,303- per debt schedule.
3 .
Administrative Allocation $39,000.
4 .
Interfund Loan Payment $290,634- per debt schedule.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment A - ROPS FY2026-27.pdf
Attachment B - Administrative Budget FY2026-27.pdf
ROPS_Resolution.docx
436
Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS 26-27) - Summary Filed for the July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2027 Period Successor Agency: Lincoln
County: Placer
Current Period Requested Funding for Enforceable
Obligations (ROPS Detail)
26-27A Total
(July -
December)
26-27B Total
(January -
June)
ROPS 26-27
Total
A Enforceable Obligations Funded as Follows (B+C+D) $ 741,028 $ - $ 741,028 B Bond Proceeds - - -
C Reserve Balance 741,028 - 741,028
D Other Funds - - -
E Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (RPTTF) (F+G) $ 34,303 $ 435,937 $ 470,240 F RPTTF 15,303 415,937 431,240
G Administrative RPTTF 19,000 20,000 39,000
H Current Period Enforceable Obligations (A+E) $ 775,331 $ 435,937 $ 1,211,268 Certification of Oversight Board Chairman:
Name Title
Pursuant to Section 34177 (o) of the Health and Safety
code, I hereby certify that the above is a true and
accurate Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule for
the above named successor agency. /s/
Signature Date
437
Lincoln
Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS 26-27) - ROPS Detail July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2027
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W
Item
# Project Name Obligation
Type
Agreement
Execution
Date
Agreement
Termination
Date
Payee Description Project
Area
Total
Outstanding
Obligation
Retired
ROPS
26-27
Total
ROPS 26-27A (Jul - Dec)
26-27A
Total
ROPS 26-27B (Jan - Jun)
26-27B
Total
Fund Sources Fund Sources
Bond
Proceeds
Reserve
Balance
Other
Funds RPTTF Admin
RPTTF
Bond
Proceeds
Reserve
Balance
Other
Funds RPTTF Admin
RPTTF
$2,638,779 $1,211,268 $- $741,028 $- $15,303 $19,000 $775,331 $- $- $- $415,937 $20,000 $435,937 4 Lincoln Brand
Feeds
City/County
Loan (Prior
06/28/11),
Cash
exchange
01/10/
2010
09/15/2033 PCWA
WCC
Downtown
Economic
Development
Original 1,619,476 N $290,634 - - - - - $- - - - 290,634 - $290,634 7 Administrative
Costs
Admin
Costs
06/12/
2012
09/15/2033 City of
Lincoln
Costs to
administer
dissolution of
RDA
Original 39,000 N $39,000 - - - - 19,000 $19,000 - - - - 20,000 $20,000 12 2016 Tax
Allocation
Bonds A/B
Bonds
Issued After
12/31/10
12/15/
2016
09/15/2033 US
Bank
Refunding of
2004 A and
B Bonds
Lincoln 855,000 N $756,331 - 741,028 - 15,303 - $756,331 - - - - - $- 13 Bond
Reserve
Reserves 01/01/
2016
09/15/2020 US
Bank
Reserve for
fall 2020
debt service
125,303 N $125,303 - - - - - $- - - - 125,303 - $125,303 438
Lincoln
Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS 26-27) - Report of Cash Balances July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024
(Report Amounts in Whole Dollars)
Pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 34177 (l), Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (RPTTF) may be listed as a source of payment on the ROPS, but only to the extent no other funding source is available or when payment from property tax revenues is required by an enforceable obligation.
A B C D E F G H
ROPS 23-24 Cash Balances
(07/01/23 - 06/30/24)
Fund Sources
Comments
Bond Proceeds Reserve Balance Other Funds RPTTF
Bonds issued
on or before
12/31/10
Bonds issued
on or after
01/01/11
Prior ROPS
RPTTF and
Reserve
Balances retained
for future
period(s)
Rent, grants,
interest, etc.
Non-Admin
and Admin
1 Beginning Available Cash Balance (Actual 07/01/23)
RPTTF amount should exclude "A" period distribution
amount.
17,380 235,250 (287,809)
2 Revenue/Income (Actual 06/30/24)
RPTTF amount should tie to the ROPS 23-24 total
distribution from the County Auditor-Controller
31,152 1,320,346
3 Expenditures for ROPS 23-24 Enforceable Obligations
(Actual 06/30/24)
1,320,346
4 Retention of Available Cash Balance (Actual 06/30/24) RPTTF amount retained should only include the amounts
distributed as reserve for future period(s)
5 ROPS 23-24 RPTTF Prior Period Adjustment
RPTTF amount should tie to the Agency's ROPS 23-24 PPA
form submitted to the CAC
No entry required
6 Ending Actual Available Cash Balance (06/30/24)
C to F = (1 + 2 - 3 - 4), G = (1 + 2 - 3 - 4 - 5)
$- $- $17,380 $266,402 $(287,809)
439
Lincoln
Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS 26-27) - Notes July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2027
Item # Notes/Comments
4 7
12 13
440
Investment Brokerage Fees $1,500
Consultant Expenses $5,500
ROPS, PPA, Advisory
Staff Time- Accounting $26,000
Monthly Loan Billings, C/R, Monthly Reconciliations, Annual Reconciliations Staff Time- ED $6,000
Loans Mgmt.
Total FY 2026-27 Admin Budget $39,000
*Reduced in prior year to meet anticipated approval level. Less than anticipated costs.
Carried this number forward.
Successor Agency to the City of Lincoln Redevelopment Agency ROPS FY2026-27
Administrative Budget
441
Resolution No. 2026-XXX
RESOLUTION 2026-xxx
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINCOLN, LINCOLN
REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY APPROVING THE RECOGNIZED
OBLIGATION PAYMENT SCHEDULE (ROPS) PURSUANT TO HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 34177(I) FOR THE PERIOD OF JULY 1, 2026 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2027
WHEREAS, pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34172, the City of Lincoln is the successor agency to the dissolved Redevelopment Agency (“RDA Successor Agency”); and
WHEREAS, it is the responsibility of the RDA Successor Agency to prepare a Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS) annually, with a prospective listing of all revenues and minimum payment amounts to be received or issued by the RDA; and
WHEREAS, the Successor Agency has prepared the required 2026-2027 ROPS for approval of the Consolidated Oversight Board at the County of Placer; and
WHEREAS, the 2026-2027 ROPS provides for loan and bond payments, as well as administrative costs; and
WHEREAS, once approved by the Consolidated Oversight Board, the ROPS must then be submitted to the County Auditor Controller, State Controller, and the Department of Finance for approval by these agencies, so the RDA Successor Agency may receive funds from the County to pay the existing debts and obligations addressed in the ROPS.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: City Council of the City Of Lincoln, Lincoln Redevelopment Successor Agency approves the ROPS in substantially the form attached to this Resolution as Attachment A, pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34177, and directs staff to submit it to the Consolidated Oversight Board for approval, and to all other agencies required.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of January, 2026 by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers:
NOES: Councilmembers:
ABSENT: Councilmembers:
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:
___________________________
Richard Pearl, Mayor
442
Resolution No. 2026-XXX
ATTEST:
Hope Ithurburn, City Clerk
443
SUBJECT:
Waive Full Reading and Introduce an Ordinance by Title Only, Regulating Electric Mobility Devices and further finding the Ordinance is exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act. (Kristine Mollenkopf) SUBMITTED BY:
Kristi McKenney
DEPARTMENT:
City Attorney's Office
DATE:
January 13, 2026
Item Number 12.A
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the City Council conduct a public hearing and adopt an Ordinance regulating Electric Mobility Devices, and further finding the Ordinance is exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”).
BACKGROUND/INTRODUCTION:
In August 2025, the Lincoln Police Department (LPD) contacted the City Attorney’s Office to report an increase in community complaints related to the operation of electric bicycles and electric scooters on city sidewalks and walking paths. The growing popularity of these devices has led to a significant rise in negative interactions between electric vehicle operators, pedestrians and drivers.
In response, LPD inquired about the possibility of updating the Lincoln Municipal Code (LMC) to prohibit the operation of bicycles and electric vehicles on city sidewalks and walking paths.
Electric Bicycle Classifications
There are three classes of electric bicycles defined under California law:
Class 1:
Pedal-assist only; motor provides assistance up to 20 mph.
Class 2:
Throttle-operated; does not require pedaling and can reach speeds up to 20 mph.
Class 3:
Pedal-assist; provides assistance up to 28 mph.
Electric scooters
(as defined in CVC §312.5) are distinct from e-bikes. While speeds vary, state law limits their maximum speed to 15 mph (CVC §22411). Despite this, many models available for purchase can achieve speeds of 20-30+ mph.
STAFF REPORT
444
Safety Concerns
Electric bicycles and scooters are frequently operated in a manner that endangers the public, particularly on sidewalks designed for pedestrian use.
Hazard to Pedestrians:
Because electric bicycles and scooters are significantly faster and quieter than traditional bicycles, pedestrians (particularly those with visual, hearing, or mobility impairments) may not hear them approaching. This creates a high risk of unexpected collisions in what should be a safe pedestrian space.
High Speeds and Operator Inexperience:
Collisions involving these devices can result
in more severe injuries than traditional bicycles due to their higher speeds and weight.
These risks are compounded when operators are inexperienced.
Use by Minors:
LPD reports that devices are frequently operated by minors under 16.
This is a significant concern as:
E-Scooter Illegality:
State law
(CVC §21235(d)) requires an e-scooter operator
to possess a valid driver's license or instruction permit , making any operation
by an unlicensed minor illegal.
Helmet Non-Compliance:
CVC §21212(a) requires helmets for riders under 18,
but this rule is frequently ignored, elevating the severity of potential injuries.
Misjudgment by Motorists:
In roadway situations, motorists often misjudge the
high approach speed of electric bicycles or scooters, increasing the likelihood of crashes at intersections and driveways.
Current Regulations
The current regulatory framework is a patchwork of state laws and local gaps, making public education and consistent enforcement difficult.
Some associated laws in the California Vehicle Code (CVC):
Class 3 E-bikes
:
CVC §21207.5 Allows local authorities to restrict the use of Class 1 and Class 2 e-bikes on bike paths or trails by ordinance.
Electric Scooters:
CVC §21235
(g)
Prohibits electric scooters from being operated
on sidewalks, except when entering or leaving adjacent property.
Helmet Law:
CVC §21212(a) Requires helmet use for riders under 18 years old on bicycles, scooters, and skateboards.
CVC §21201 and §21200:
Treats bicyclists and e-bike riders similarly to vehicle operators on the roadway.
Class 1&2 E-Bikes
:
The CVC treats Class 1 and Class 2 e-bikes similarly to traditional bicycles. State law does not explicitly prohibit bicycles of Class 1-2 e- bikes from sidewalks, delegating that authority to local jurisdictions.
FINDINGS/ANALYSIS:
Lincoln Municipal Code (LMC):
The LMC currently lacks any ordinance that specifically regulates or prohibits electric bicycle or scooter use on city sidewalks or walking paths. This absence of local regulation means that enforcement is limited to state law provisions, which do not fully address sidewalk or path use within city limits.
445
The Regulatory Gap and Purpose of Ordinance
The current legal framework creates a clear enforcement gap. While state law already bans e- scooters and Class 3 e-bikes from sidewalks, the LMC is silent on Class 1 and Class 2 e- bikes. This loophole allows high-speed devices in pedestrian-only areas.
The proposed ordinance is intended to accomplish two primary goals:
1 .
Close the Gap:
Prohibit Class 1 and Class 2 e-bikes from sidewalks and walking paths, creating a consistent rule with traditional bicycles.
2 .
Consolidate and Clarify:
Adopt the existing CVC prohibitions on e-scooters and Class 3 e-bikes into the LMC. This provides LPD with a clear, single local ordinance to enforce and allows the City to utilize local remedies, such as administrative citations, to gain compliance.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
The proposed Ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), as codified at Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq., and as further governed by 14 California Code of Regulations §§ 15000, et seq., because it is not a project as contemplated by 14 C.C.R. § 15378. Even if this Ordinance were subject to CEQA, this Ordinance is exempt from the requirements of CEQA pursuant to 14 C.C.R. § 15061(b)(3), because there is no possibility it will have a significant effect on the environment.
FISCAL IMPACT:
To the extent this action will result in fiscal impacts, they will be minor and related to any additional fines given to individuals who violate the new ordinance.
ATTACHMENTS:
Ordinance__draft_ (2).docx
446
ORDINANCE NO. XXXX
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINCOLN, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE
LINCOLN MUNICIPAL CODE TO REGULATE THE OPERATION OF MOBILITY DEVICES ON CITY
SIDEWALKS
WHEREAS, the City of Lincoln has experienced a significant increase in the use of motorized devices, including electric bicycles (e-bikes) and electric motorized scooters (e-scooters), on public rights-of- way; and
WHEREAS, e-bikes and e-scooters are capable of traveling at speeds significantly greater than pedestrian walking speeds, creating a dangerous speed differential on sidewalks and increasing the risk of collisions; and
WHEREAS, these devices often operate quietly, making it difficult for pedestrians, particularly seniors, children, and persons with disabilities, to be aware of their approach from behind; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that sidewalks are designed and intended primarily for pedestrian use, and their use by motorized vehicles creates an unsafe environment that discourages walking and impedes safe passage; and
WHEREAS, the City has a compelling interest in ensuring the safety, accessibility, and general welfare of pedestrians on its public sidewalks; and
WHEREAS, the City currently does not have regulations for mobility devices; and WHEREAS, the California Vehicle Code, including but not limited to sections 21206 and 21235, grants the City of Lincoln the authority to regulate the operation of bicycles, electric bicycles, and motorized scooters on public sidewalks to protect public safety.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINCOLN does ordain as follows:
Section 1. Incorporation of Recitals. The City Council hereby incorporates by reference the recitals set forth above.
Section 2. CEQA Analysis. This Ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), as codified at Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq., and as further governed by 14 California Code of Regulations §§ 15000, et seq., because it is not a project as conte mplated by 14 C.C.R. § 15378.
Section 3. Severability. If any section, sub -section, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, s uch decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the Ordinance. City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted the Ordinance and each section, sub-section, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, sub -sections, sentences, clauses, phrases or portions to be declared invalid or unconstitutional.
Section 4. Publication. Within fifteen days of passage of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause the full text of the Ordinance, with the names of those City Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance, to be published in the Lincoln News Messenger. In lieu of publishing the full text of the 447
Ordinance, the City Clerk, if so directed by the City Attorney and within fifteen days, shall cause a summary of the Ordinance, prepared by the City Attorney and with the names of the City Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance, to be published in the Lincoln News Messenger, and shall post in the office of the City Clerk a certified copy of the City Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance. The publication of a summary of the Ordinance in lieu of the full text of the Ordinance is authorized only where the requirements of Government Code § 36933(c)(1) are met.
Section 5. Enactment. Chapter 5.25 of the Lincoln Municipal Code is hereby enacted as follows:
Chapter 12.90 OPERATION OF REGULATED MOBILITY DEVICES
12.90.010 Purpose.
The City hereby adopts the motorized mobility device ordinance to promote the safety of persons using electric bicycles, electric personal assistive mobility devices, electrically motorized boards, motorized scooters, low-speed vehicles, and other similar vehicles, all defined as “motorized mobility devices” herein, while maximizing recreational opportunities and fully exempting disabled persons operating electric mobility devices from these requirements.
12.90.020 Definitions.
“Bicycle” has the same meaning as in California Vehicle Code Section 231, as it may be amended from time to time.
“Electric bicycle” has the same meaning as in California Vehicle Code Section 312.5, as it may be amended from time to time.
“Electric personal assistive mobility device” has the same meaning as in California Vehicle Code Section 313, as it may be amended from time to time.
“Electrically motorized boards” has the same meaning as in California Vehicle Code Section 313.5, as it may be amended from time to time.
“Low speed vehicle” has the same meaning as in California Vehicle Code Section 385.5, as it may be amended from time to time.
“Motorized scooter” has the same meaning as in California Vehicle Code Section 407.5, as it may be amended from time to time.
“E-Conveyance” means any electric bicycle, electric scooter, electric skateboard, or other device that is designed to convey one or more people and is capable of being powered by human propulsion or electric motor propulsion.
“Operator” means a person who owns, operates, and/or controls a regulated mobility device. 448
“Public area” means any outdoor area that is open to the members of the public for public use, whether owned or operated by the city or a private party. “Regulated mobility device” means bicycles, electric bicycles, electric personal assistive mobility devices, electrically motorized boards, low-speed vehicles, motorized scooters, shared mobility devices, or other similar vehicles.
“Rider” means a traveler riding in or on a regulated mobility device who is not operating it. “Shared mobility device” has the same meaning as in California Civil Code Section 2505, as it may be amended from time to time.
“Vehicle” has the same meaning as in California Vehicle Code Section 670, as it may be amended from time to time.
12.90.020 Operation of regulated mobility devices.
No person shall ride a bicycle or e-conveyance in an unsafe manner on a public street, public right-of- way, public place, or place open to the public for vehicle or pedestrian travel.
A. Riding in an unsafe manner means an operation:
1. In a manner that violates an existing traffic safety law; or
2. In a manner that constitutes a danger to the operator, a passenger, other motorists, other riders, pedestrians, or property.
B. Examples of riding in an unsafe manner may include, but are not limited to, the following examples:
1. Riding on a public street or bikeway against the flow of traffic.
2. Not yielding to vehicles or pedestrians when required.
3. Operating an e-conveyance in a manner it was not designed for, including carrying passengers when not designed for carrying passengers.
4. Failing to obey posted traffic or other signs.
5. A person under the age of 18 riding without a properly fitted and fastened helmet.
6. Engaging in racing or speed contests.
7. Carrying any package, bundle, item or article which prohibits the operator from having full control and forward visibility at all times.
8. Operating a bicycle or e-conveyance at a speed greater than is reasonable and prudent under the conditions then existing taking into account the weather, pedestrian and vehicular traffic, and the surface and width of the sidewalk or roadway. 449
9. Performing any acrobatics, tricks, wheelies, or stunts when pedestrians or moving vehicles are close proximity.
C. Any person operating a bicycle or e-conveyance upon a street at a speed less than the normal speed of traffic moving in the same direction at such time shall ride as close as practicable to the right-hand curb or edge of the roadway, except under any of the following situations:
1. When overtaking and passing another bicycle, e-conveyance, or vehicle proceeding in the same direction.
2. When preparing for a left turn at an intersection or into a private road or driveway.
3. When reasonably necessary to avoid conditions (including, but not limited to, fixed or moving objects, vehicles, e-conveyances, bicycles, pedestrians, animals, surface hazards, or narrow width lanes) that make it unsafe to continue along the right-hand curb or edge.
4. When operating as close as practicable to the left-hand curb or edge of the roadway on a one-way street.
D. Persons riding or operating bicycles or electric bicycles shall not ride more than two abreast, except on paths or parts of a roadway set aside for the exclusive use of bicycles.
E. Any person operating a bicycle or e-conveyance who is emerging from an alley, driveway, bicycle path, building or otherwise approaching upon a sidewalk or sidewalk area, shall yield the right-of- way to all pedestrians on such sidewalk or sidewalk area, and upon entering a bicycle lane, highway, or street shall yield the right-of-way to all vehicles, bicycles, or e-conveyances on the roadway.
F. No operating or riding on sidewalks, walking trails, or golf cart trails.
No person shall operate or ride a regulated mobility device upon any sidewalk, walking trail, or golf cart trail within the city limits of Lincoln, California, except:
1. A person may ride a bicycle or electric bicycle on any area designated as a driveway; or
2. Any area designated as a bikeway by the City Council.
12.90.030 Equipment.
A. All persons under the age of 18 operating or riding as a passenger upon a bicycle or e- conveyance on a public street, public right-of-way, public place, or place open to the public for vehicle and pedestrian travel must wear a properly fitted and fastened bicycle helmet.
B. No person shall operate a bicycle or electric bicycle on a roadway unless it is equipped with a brake that will enable the operator to make one braked wheel skid on dry, level, clean pavement.
450
C. All bicycles and electric bicycles shall have reflectors affixed to both the front and back wheels and on the rear of the bicycle or electric bicycle.
D. All bicycles and electric bicycles operated during darkness upon shall be equipped with a lamp emitting a white light that, while the bicycle is in motion, illuminates the ground in front of the bicycle or electric bicycle and is visible from a distance of 300 feet in front and from the sides of the bicycle.
12.90.040 Parking.
No persons shall leave or park a bicycle, motorized bicycle, or e-conveyance in a manner that obstructs the pedestrian travel way of any sidewalk or pedestrian path, or on public property in violation of any official sign prohibiting parking or bicycles at a location.
12.90.050 Enforcement.
Violations of this section are subject to the following standards.
A. Any person violating any provision of this division is guilty of an infraction or misdemeanor, at the discretion of the issuing officer and subject to a fine not to exceed $50.
B. If any person under the age of 18 is cited for violating this section, the City officer issuing the infraction may impound the electric bicycle, motor-driven cycle, pocket bike or any other electric or motorized conveyance to the City of Lincoln Police Department, such that the electric bicycle, motor- driven cycle, pocket bike or any other electric or motorized conveyance shall be released to a responsible adult upon payment of the impound fee established by the City Council.
12.90.060 Exemptions.
A. Public agency personnel.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, or any other section of this code, city and public agency personnel may operate regulated mobility devices or other vehicles at any place in the city in the performance of their official duties.
B. Disability.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this Code, nothing is intended to apply or otherwise restrict electric bicycles, motor-driven cycles, pocket bikes or any other electric or motorized conveyances operated by any officer employed by the City while on duty, or as utilized in a safe manner by physically disabled persons as defined under the Americans with Disabilities Act (42 U.S.C. Section 12101 et seq.)
12.90.070 Severability.
451
If any portion of this chapter, or its application to particular persons or circumstances, is held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a final decision of a court of competent jurisdiction, the decision will not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this chapter or the application of the chapter to persons or circumstances not similarly situated.
INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lincoln held on January 13, 2026.
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
Richard Pearl, Mayor
ATTEST:
Hope Ithurburn, City Clerk
452
SUBJECT:
Waive Full Reading and Introduce an Ordinance by Title Only, Repealing Chapter 5.40 of the Municipal Code, entitled
"Fortune Telling and Occult Arts". (
Kristine Mollenkopf
)
SUBMITTED BY:
Kristi McKenney
DEPARTMENT:
City Attorney's Office
DATE:
January 13, 2026
Item Number 12.B
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council move to repeal Chapter 5.40 of the Lincoln Municipal Code
.
This action ensures that the City’s regulatory framework remains consistent with constitutional protections for free speech and religious expression while removing redundant and overly burdensome licensing requirements
.
BACKGROUND/INTRODUCTION:
In 2004, the City adopted Chapter 5.40 to regulate fortunetelling and occult arts .
The stated
intent was to protect the public interest by establishing minimum qualifications for practitioners and providing a licensing mechanism for those engaging in these practices for profit .
Currently, the code requires an extensive investigation by the Chief of Police and a two-stage approval process involving both a police decision and a Planning Commission Conditional Use Permit
.
Since the adoption of these regulations, items associated with occult arts—such as tarot cards, crystals, and metaphysical products—have become mainstream in both traditional and online retail
.
Furthermore, the City’s general business license and zoning requirements, combined with state consumer protection laws, are now deemed sufficient to address public safety concerns
.
Relevant Legal Considerations
Spiritual Psychic Science Church v. City of Azusa
(1985)
The California Supreme Court held that fortunetelling is a form of expression protected by the First Amendment
.
The court determined that even if fortunetelling is conducted for profit, it involves the communication of spiritual, philosophical, or psychological belief systems and cannot be banned outright
.
Constitutional Overbreadth
STAFF REPORT
453
Licensing schemes that are "highly restrictive" or "overly broad" present significant risks of violating constitutional protections for free speech
.
Regulations that do not add substantive
public protection beyond what is provided by general law are often vulnerable to legal challenge
.
The "Broad Definitions" Problem
Under the doctrine of overbreadth, a law is invalid if its definitions are so wide that they "chill" or prevent legal speech. The current definitions of "Fortuneteller" and "Fortunetelling and occult arts" are so broad, they could technically subject a standard gift shop owner or a meditation instructor to criminal history investigation and Planning Commission hearings since items such as meditation cards and crystals are so ubiquitous in general commerce. Those rigorous requirements create a barrier to entry that is disproportionate to the activity being regulated, making the law "overly broad and unduly restrictive".
Protected Speech vs. Unprotected Conduct
The California Supreme Court in
Spiritual Psychic Science Church v. City of Azusa
established that fortunetelling is not just a business transaction, but a form of "protected expression".
The Protected Element
When a practitioner uses tarot cards or "occult arts" to communicate spiritual, philosophical, or psychological belief systems, they are engaging in speech protected by the First Amendment .
The Unprotected Element
While the City has a legitimate interest in preventing fraud, it cannot do so by creating a "highly restrictive licensing scheme" that treats all such speech as inherently deceptive .
FINDINGS/ANALYSIS:
The recommendation to repeal Chapter 5.40 is based on a critical analysis of the current Municipal Code against established constitutional standards and modern commercial realities.
Staff has identified the following primary areas of concern:
Direct Conflict with the "Speech" Protections of
Spiritual Psychic Science Church
The current Lincoln Municipal Code (LMC) treats "fortunetelling" as a purely commercial activity subject to rigorous police-level vetting. However, the California Supreme Court in Spiritual Psychic Science Church v. City of Azusa
(1985) held that such activities are a form of
"protected expression" because they involve the communication of thoughts, feelings, and beliefs.
Burden on Speech
LMC Chapter 5.40 imposes a "pre-speech" burden—requiring a practitioner to pass a criminal investigation and obtain a Planning Commission permit
before
they can speak.
454
Prior Restraint
Unlike a standard business license, which is a ministerial tax, the current ordinance grants the City "undue discretion" to deny a permit based on a person’s background or a subjective "Conditional Use" hearing. This creates a "prior restraint" on speech, which is constitutionally suspect.
Analytical Failure of "Broad Definitions"
The doctrine of overbreadth prohibits laws that are so broad they "sweep in" protected activity alongside the conduct they intend to regulate.
Broad Definition
LMC 5.40.020 defines occult arts so broadly that it includes anyone "advertising as a psychic, spiritual reader, or spiritual counselor."
Commonplace Items
In 2004, these practices were viewed as niche commercial activities. Today, items such as tarot cards, meditation aids, and crystals are sold ubiquitously in standard gift shops and retail stores.
Logistical Problems
Under the current code, a bookstore owner hosting a "tarot-themed" book signing or a wellness center offering "spiritual counseling" could technically be required to undergo a Chief of Police investigation. This creates a "chilling effect" on legitimate commerce and expressive activity that far exceeds the City’s need to prevent fraud.
The Two-Stage Approval Process as an "Undue Burden"
Currently, an applicant must secure both a favorable police decision and a Planning Commission Conditional Use Permit (CUP). Requiring any business owner selling crystals, tarot cards, or doing tarot readings, etc to apply for a CUP, which is a discretionary land-use
tool used for high-impact activities, is disproportionate. Because there is no evidence that a psychic reader has a greater land-use impact (noise, traffic, parking) than a standard consultant or insurance agent, the specialized CUP requirement is "unduly restrictive." Sufficiency of Existing General Laws
A core principle of municipal law is that specialized regulations should only exist if general laws are insufficient.
Potential harms associated with fortunetelling—namely fraud and larceny —are already criminalized under the California Penal Code (e.g., Section 484 - Theft/Fraud) and protected by the California Consumer Privacy Act.
The City’s general business license requirements (LMC Title 5) and standard zoning laws for "professional services" or "retail" are sufficient to regulate the location and operation of these businesses. Removing the "occult arts" filter allows these businesses to be treated exactly like any other professional service, ensuring equal protection under the law.
Rational for Repeal
455
Staff recommends repeal rather than amendment because the entire premise of Chapter 5.40 —that spiritual communication requires specialized police and commission oversight—is no longer legally or practically defensible. By repealing the chapter in its entirety, the City:
1 .
Removes the risk of a First Amendment lawsuit based on overbreadth or prior restraint.
2 .
Recognizes that spiritual and metaphysical goods/services are now standard components of the retail economy.
3 .
Frees up Police Department and Planning staff resources by removing a redundant, two-stage investigative process for low-impact businesses.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
This Ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because it is not a project as contemplated by 14 C.C.R.
§ 15378
.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The repeal of Chapter 5.40 will eliminate the administrative costs associated with police investigations and Planning Commission hearings for these specific business types .
General
business license fees will still apply to any such businesses operating within the City, ensuring no significant negative impact on the General Fund
.
ATTACHMENTS:
CHAPTER_5.40___FORTUNETELLING_AND_OCCULT_ARTS.docx
Ordinance_to_Repeal_Occult_and_Fortunetelling_ordinance (1).docx 456
Title 5 - BUSINESS TAXES, LICENSES AND REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 5.40 FORTUNETELLING AND OCCULT ARTS
Lincoln, California, Code of Ordinances Created: 2025-07-28 09:21:29 [EST] (Supp. No. 19)
CHAPTER 5.40 FORTUNETELLING AND OCCULT ARTS
Article I. General Provisions
5.40.010 Purpose and intent.
It is the purpose and intent of the city council that the operation of fortunetelling and/or occult arts establishments and persons operating as fortunetellers should be regulated so as to further the public interest, safety and welfare by providing minimum qualifications for such persons. It is the purpose of this chapter to prescribe means of licensing practitioners who engage in fortunetelling for profit so that information about those so engaged is available to the public and the city government. (Ord. 762B §1(part), 2004)
5.40.020 Definitions.
As used in this chapter:
"Fortuneteller" means any person who advertises by sign, circular, h andbill, newspaper, periodical, magazine or other means whatsoever the practice of fortunetelling and/or occult arts, and shall include any person who advertises as a "psychic" or "spiritual reader" or "spiritual counselor" for the purpose of the practice of fortunetelling and/or occult arts.
"Fortunetelling and occult arts" mean engaging for profit, directly or indirectly, in the act of telling of fortune and forecasting of futures by means of an occult, psychic power, faculty, force, clairvoyance, cartom ancy, psychology, psychometry, numerology, hypnosis, phrenology, spirits, tea leaves or other craft, art, science, cards, talisman, charm, potion, magnetism, magnetized article or substance, cunning or foresight, crystal gazing, mysteries or magic of any kind or nature.
(Ord. 762B §1(part), 2004)
5.40.030 Exemptions.
This chapter shall not apply to:
(1) Any person solely by reason of the fact that he or she is engaged in the business of entertaining the public by demonstrations or mind reading, mental telepathy, thought conveyance, or the giving or horoscopic readings, at public places and in the presence of and within the hearing of other persons and at which no questions are answered, as part of such entertainment, except in a manner to permit all persons present at such public place to hear such answers, when not conducted in connection with the business of fortunetelling;
(2) Any person who conducts or participates in any religious ceremony or service when such person holds a certificate of ordination as a minister, missionary, medium, healer or clairvoyant from any bona fide church or religious association maintaining a church and holding regular services, and having a creed or set of religious principles that is recognized by all churches of like faith; provided, further, that the fees, gratuities, emoluments and profits thereof shall be regularly accounted for and paid solely to or for the benefit of the church or religious association;
457
Created: 2025-07-28 09:21:29 [EST]
(Supp. No. 19)
(3) Nothing in this section shall be construed as exempting any person from the payment of any applicable business license fee which may be required to be paid by the licensing provisions of this Code. (Ord. 762B §1(part), 2004)
Article II. Licenses
5.40.040 License required.
(a) No person, association, partnership, or corporation shall conduct, operate or advertise for an establishment in which the practice of fortunetelling and occult arts is carried on for pay, compensation or gratuity without obtaining and maintaining in effect a license as required by this chapter. (b) No licensee hereunder shall employ any person who practices fortunetelling and/or occult arts, and who offers to or solicits to perform fortunetelling and occult arts, or who holds himself/herself out to be a fortuneteller if the person does not hold a current, unrevoked license as required by this chapter. (c) The license issued to a fortuneteller shall be prominently displayed at the licensed premises. (Ord. 762B §1(part), 2004)
5.40.050 License application—Fees.
(a) An application for a license to practice fortunetelling and occults arts shall be made to a duly author ized representative of the chief of police under penalty of perjury on forms provided by the chief of police. The application to practice fortunetelling and occults arts shall be accompanied by an investigation filing fee of $250.00, plus the fee charged by Department of Justice for fingerprint processing. This fee is not refundable in the event such application is denied.
(b) Licenses and fees required under this chapter shall be in addition to any license, permit or fee required under any other chapter of this Code.
(Ord. 762B §1(part), 2004)
5.40.060 Application contents.
Any applicant for a license under this chapter shall submit the following information under penalty of perjury:
(1) The full name and present residence and business address and telephone numbers of the applicant; (2) Any and all maiden, fictitious or other names ever used by the applicant; (3) Prior residence and business addresses used by the applicant during the ten-year period preceding the date of the application;
(4) The birthdate and place of birth of the applicant;
(5) The social security number and a California driver's license or California identification ca rd number or other satisfactory government issued identification number of the applicant; (6) The applicant's height, weight, hair and eye color, and all distinguishing marks, scars or tattoos; 458
Created: 2025-07-28 09:21:29 [EST]
(Supp. No. 19)
(7) Business, occupation or employment history of the applicant for a period of ten years preceding the date of application;
(8) The name or names under which the applicant proposes to conduct the activity or practice and the business address of the premises where such practice is to be carried on and if is it to be in connection with a similar or other kind of business;
(9) The name or names, both true and fictitious, and addresses of any and all persons, associations, partnerships or corporations holding an interest or involvement in the activity; (10) A statement of any and all criminal convictions, except minor traffic offenses not designated as a felony, including the nature thereof, where they occurred and the sentence therefor; (11) A list of fortunetelling or similar licenses currently or previously held by the applicant and whether any such license had been revoked or suspended and the reason therefor; (12) A list of at least three character references unrelated to the applicant by blood or marriage , and known to the applicant for at least five years. The list shall include true and fictitious names and current addresses and telephone numbers of the character references; (13) Such other identification and information as is necessary to discover the validity of the matters hereinabove specified as required to be set forth in the application. (Ord. 762B §1(part), 2004)
5.40.070 Required information and documents.
Before the application is considered to be complete, the applicant must produce, provide and submit to the following:
(1) California driver's license or California identification card, or other valid and satisfactory do cumentary evidence of the age and identity of the applicant. To be "satisfactory," the documentary evidence of age and identity must be of official issue of some governmental agency, be currently valid and furnish a photograph, weight, height, color of eyes and hair, sex, age and/or date of birth and signature of the applicant. Birth certificates are not satisfactory identification as they do not include evidence or identity by description of the person named;
(2) A photograph of the applicant, to be taken by an authorized employee of the chief of police at the time of application;
(3) Fingerprints of the applicant, to be taken by an authorized employee of the chief of police at the time of application;
(4) Consent in writing, on a form determined by the chief of police, for the use of all information available in the investigation provided in this chapter to be made. (Ord. 762B §1(part), 2004)
5.40.080 Investigation.
The chief of police, or his authorized representative, shall conduct and complete an investigation of the moral character and business responsibility of the applicant and either grant or deny the license within a period of 45 days after the submission of the completed applications, except if good cause exists, the chief of police may extend the period of investigation for a period of time not to exceed 30 days, provided that applicant is notified in writing that the investigation has not been completed.
459
Created: 2025-07-28 09:21:29 [EST]
(Supp. No. 19)
(Ord. 762B §1(part), 2004)
5.40.090 Right to refuse license.
(a) If the chief of police finds that either the applicant's character or his or her business responsibility is unsatisfactory, or if the applicant fails to or refuses to furnish the information and documents required by this chapter, or who submits false or misleading information on the application, or that the applicant has been convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude, the chief of police shall refuse to issue the license. The chief of police shall notify the applicant of his or her decision in writing not more than the number of days specified in Section 5.40.070 of this chapter.
(b) If the chief of police finds that both the applicant's character and his or her business responsibility are satisfactory, he or she shall notify the applicant of his or her intent to issue a license upon condition t hat the applicant obtains within 90 days a conditional use permit for a particular location as provided in Section
5.40.120 of this chapter.
(Ord. 762B §1(part), 2004)
5.40.100 Revocation.
(a) The chief of police shall revoke any license upon any grounds for which he may have refused the issuance thereof or upon conviction or upon a plea of guilty or nolo contendere for any violation of this chapter or the operation of the establishment does not comport with the peace, health, safety and general welfare of the public.
(b) To revoke a license, the chief of police, or his authorized representative, shall serve upon the holder thereof, a written notice either by personal service or by deposit in a United States Mail receptacle with appropriate postage affixed, to the address shown on the application or otherwise more recently of record, that the license shall be revoked effective upon personal service or five days after the date of mailing of the no tice. (c) A revoked license shall be immediately surrendered to the chief of police or his authorized representative. (Ord. 762B §1(part), 2004)
5.40.110 Appeal.
(a) A notice of appeal must be deposited with the city clerk within 30 days after denial of the application or revocation of the license has been served. Upon the filing of a notice of appeal, the revocation of a license shall remain in effect until such time a decision has been rendered. (b) Upon the filing of the written notice of appeal, the city clerk shall set the matter for hearing before the city council, which hearing shall be within 30 days after the date of the notice. T he city council shall receive a copy of the denial or revocation notice and shall conduct a hearing to determine whether or not the license should be granted or reinstated. The scope of evidence presented to the city council shall be limited to evidence regarding the reasons for denial or revocation. The burden of proof shall be upon the appellant/applicant.
(c) The decision of the city council shall be final with no right of further appeal. (Ord. 762B §1(part), 2004)
460
Created: 2025-07-28 09:21:29 [EST]
(Supp. No. 19)
5.40.120 Conditional use permit required.
(a) If the chief of police decides that a license may properly be issued, the applicant shall then file an application with the planning commission for a conditional use permit for a particular location. (b) The applicant shall comply with the provisions of law and the ordinances of the city governing the issuance of a conditional use permit, as specified in Chapters 18.54 and 18.56 of this Code. The planning commission may not issue a conditional use permit for the conduct of the business of fortunetelling in any district except the commercial district or the highway commercial district. (c) In the proceedings for a conditional use permit for this purpose, the planning commission has the discretion to:
(1) Fix and prescribe the signs, exterior appearance and exterior elevations of the premises where the business is proposed to be conducted;
(2) Limit number of employees, hours of operation, and other businesses conducted on the premises; and (3) Impose other conditions customarily attached to conditional use permits. (d) The planning commission may not issue a conditional use permit for the operation of the business of fortunetelling from a trailer, vehicle or temporary structure. (e) The planning commission may not consider an application for a conditiona l use permit for the business of fortunetelling until the chief of police notifies the applicant of a favorable decision by the chief of police under Section 5.40.080 of this chapter.
(Ord. 762B §1(part), 2004)
5.40.130 Issuance of license.
If the chief of police acts favorably upon the application as provided in Section 5.40.090 of this chapter and the planning commission approves a conditional use permit as provided in Section 5.40.120 of this chapter then, upon the issuance of a conditional use permit, the chief of police shall issue a license to the applicant. (Ord. 762B §1(part), 2004)
5.40.140 Additional terms and conditions of license.
The chief of police may impose additional terms and conditions upon the issuance of a license if the chief of police finds that it is necessary to do so in order to protect the general public from the threat of fraud or misrepresentation or public nuisance.
(Ord. 762B §1(part), 2004)
5.40.150 License fee.
The fee for the issuance of a license is $250.00 a year. The fee is due when the licen se is issued. The first annual fee shall be prorated from the date of issuance to December 31. (Ord. 762B §1(part), 2004)
461
Created: 2025-07-28 09:21:29 [EST]
(Supp. No. 19)
5.40.160 License not transferable.
A licensee may not assign or transfer a license.
(Ord. 762B §1(part), 2004)
5.40.170 Separate licenses for individuals.
Each and every person engaged in or who proposes to engage in the practice of fortunetelling and occult arts shall file a separate and individual application as set forth in this chapter and shall pay separate and individ ual filing and renewal fees. This shall include persons who engage in the practice under one common establishment. (Ord. 762B §1(part), 2004)
5.40.180 Duration and renewal of license.
The fortunetelling license authorizes the holder to engage in the activity for a period of not more than one year. The licensee and permit holder may renew the privilege of engaging in the activity by filing a n application for a renewal upon a form prescribed by the chief of police and paying the annual license fee. The renewal fee is not prorated and is not refundable.
(Ord. 762B §1(part), 2004)
Article III. Prohibited Acts
5.40.190 Certain activity prohibited.
No person may engage in the activity of fortunetelling:
(1) Without a license to do so;
(2) In violation of this chapter; or
(3) In violation of a term or condition of the license; (4) Upon any premises for which a conditional use permit is not issued; (5) In violation of any condition of a conditional use permit. (Ord. 762B §1(part), 2004)
5.40.200 Penalty for violation.
Any person violating any of the provisions of this chapter, or knowingly or intentionally misrepresenting to any officer or employee of this city, any material fact in procuring the license provided for in this chapter is guilty of a misdemeanor.
(Ord. 762B §1(part), 2004)
462
ORDINANCE NO. XXXX
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINCOLN REPEALING CHAPTER 5.40 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE, ENTITLED "FORTUNETELLING AND OCCULT ARTS" WHEREAS, the City previously adopted Chapter 5.40 in 2004 with the stated purpose of regulating fortunetelling and occult arts to further the public interest, safety, and welfare by providing minimum qualifications for practitioners, and to prescribe licensing means for those engaging in the practice for profit; and
WHEREAS, the use and sale of items associated with occult arts, such as tarot cards, meditation cards, crystals, and general spiritual or metaphysical products, have become ubiquitous in general commerce, being commonly sold both in traditional gift shops and through online retail platforms, demonstrating the mainstream acceptance of these goods and rendering overly restrictive regulation unnecessary; and
WHEREAS, the existing regulations impose specific application requirements, including extensive personal and criminal history information, an investigation process by the Chief of Police, and a two-stage approval process requiring both a favorable police decision and a Planning Commission Conditional Use Permit. These rigorous requirements and the broad definitions of "Fortuneteller" and "Fortunetelling and occult arts" may impose an undue regulatory burden on expressive and communicative activity; and WHEREAS, the practice of fortunetelling, while subject to fraud regulation, constitutes a form of expression protected by the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, as held in the California Supreme Court case, Spiritual Psychic Science Church v. City of Azuza in 1985, particularly when viewed as the communication of spiritual, philosophical, or psychological belief systems. The current, highly restrictive licensing scheme presents a significant risk of violating constitutional protections for free speech and religious expression; and WHEREAS, the City's general business license and zoning requirements, along with existing State and local laws concerning fraud, consumer protection, and general public welfare, are deemed sufficient to address legitimate public safety and criminal concerns related to these businesses without the need for a specialized and potentially constitutionally suspect regulatory action; and
WHEREAS, the City Council determines that Chapter 5.40 is overly broad, unduly restrictive, and redundant with other laws, and that its continued existence is not in the best interest of the City, as it potentially compromises citizens' constitutional rights while failing to add substantive public protection beyond what is provided by general law.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINCOLN does ordain as follows:
463
Section 1. Incorporation of Recitals. The City Council hereby incorporates by reference the recitals set forth above.
Section 2. CEQA Analysis. This Ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), as codified at Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq., and as further governed by 14 California Code of Regulations §§ 15000, et seq., because it is not a project as contemplated by 14 C.C.R. § 15378.
Section 3. Severability. If any section, sub-section, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the Ordinanc e. City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted the Ordinance and each section, sub -section, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, sub - sections, sentences, clauses, phrases or portions to be declared invalid or unconstitutional.
Section 4. Publication. Within fifteen days of passage of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause the full text of the Ordinance, with the names of those City Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance, to be published in the Lincoln News Messenger. In lieu of publishing the full text of the Ordinance, the City Clerk, if so directed by the City Attorney and within fifteen days, shall cause a summary of the Ordinance, prepared by the City Attorney and with the names of the City Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance, to be published in the Lincoln News Messenger, and shall post in the office of the City Clerk a certified copy of the City Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinanc e. The publication of a summary of the Ordinance in lieu of the full text of the Ordinance is authorized only where the requirements of Government Code § 36933(c)(1) are met.
Section 5. Repeal. Chapter 5.40 of the Lincoln Municipal Code is hereby repealed in its entirety.
INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lincoln held on January 13, 2026.
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
Richard Pearl, Mayor
ATTEST:
Hope Ithurburn, City Clerk
464
465